vvEPA
                 United States
                 Environmental Protection
                 ' Agency
                  Off ice of
                  Research and Development
                  Washington, DC 20460.
EPA/600/8-91/0495A
August 1991
External Review Draft
Air Quality
Criteria for
Oxides of
Nitrogen
                                                     Draft

                                                     Do not
                                                     Cite or Quote
                 Volume II of  III
                                 NOTICE               ;;


                  This document is a preliminary draft. It has not been formally
                  released by EPA and should not at this stage be construed to
                  represent Agency policy. It is being circulated for comment on its
                  technical accuracy and policy implications.

-------

-------
(Do not Cite or Quote)
EPA 600/8-91/049bA
August 1991
External Review Draft
                          Air Qualify Criteria for
                            Oxides of Nitrogen

                               Volume II  of III
                                       NOTICE

               This document is a preliminary draft. It has not been formally released by
               EPA and should not at this stage be construed to represent Agency policy.
               It is being circulated for comment on its technical accuracy and policy
               implications.
                      Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
                     Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
                          Office of Research and Development
                         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                          Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                                                          Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

     This document is an external draft for review purposes only and does not constitute
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy.  Mention of trade names or commercial
products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
August 1991
H-ii
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
              Air Quality Criteria for Oxides of Nitrogen
                        TABLE OF CONTENTS

                             Volume I

 1. SUMMARY OF EFFECTS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN AND
   RELATED COMPOUNDS ON HUMAN HEALTH AND
   WELFARE	

 2. INTRODUCTION	

 3. GENERAL CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF NOX
   AND NOT-DERIVED POLLUTANTS  	
          A.

 4. SOURCES OF NITROGEN OXIDES INFLUENCING AMBIENT
   AND INDOOR AIR QUALITY  	

 5. TRANSPORT AND TRANSFORMATION OF NITROGEN
   OXIDES	

 6. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS FOR OXIDES OF NITROGEN
   AND RELATED SPECIES  	

 7. AMBIENT AND INDOOR CONCENTRATIONS OF NITROGEN
   DIOXIDE	

 8. ASSESSING TOTAL HUMAN EXPOSURE TO NITROGEN
   DIOXIDE	


                             Volume n

 9. EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON VEGETATION	

10. THE EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON NATURAL
   ECOSYSTEMS AND THEIR COMPONENTS  	

11. EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON VISIBILITY	

12. EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON MATERIALS	
                       1-1

                       2-1


                       3-1


                       4-1


                       5-1


                       6-1


                       7-1


                       8-1
                      9-1


                      10-1

                      11-1

                      12-1
August 1991
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                  Air Quality Criteria for Oxides of Nitrogen
                      TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)

                              Volume
 13. STUDIES OF THE EFFECTS OF NITROGEN COMPOUNDS
    ON ANIMALS ...................
 14. EPDDEMIOLOGY STUDIES OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN
 15. CONTROLLED HUMAN EXPOSURE STUDIES OF OXIDES
    OF NITROGEN	
 16. HEALTH EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH EXPOSURE TO
    NITROGEN DIOXIDE	
 APPENDK A:  GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS
                              13-1

                              14-1


                              15-1


                              16-1

                              A-l
August 1991
E-iv     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                  CONTENTS
 TABLES	.:........ . .	
 FIGURES	
 AUTHORS	:	
 CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS	

 9.  AFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON VEGETATION	
    9.1   INTRODUCTION  . .... .^ ............	
    9.2   METHODOLOGIES USED IN VEGETATION" ~"
          EFFECTS RESEARCH  ..... _v_	. .........
          9.2.1    Experimental Design and Statistical Analyses .
          9.2.2    Exposure Systems	
                  9.2.2.1 Supply	
                  9.2.2.2 Chambers . .	...!.. .  .
                  9.2.2.3 Monitoring	
          9.2.3    Pollutant Climatology .	
          9.2.4    Pollutant Chemistry	'...'..  . .
          9.2.5    Terminology	
                  9.2.5.1 Plant Response	
                  9.2.5.2 Pollutant Exposure  .  . .	
    9.3   MODE OF ACTION	
          9.3.1    Gas Uptake	
                  9.3.1.1 External NOX Ratios around Leaves . .  .
                  9.3.1.2 Solution Properties of NOX	
                  9.3.1.3 Foliar Uptake of Nitrate	
                  9.3.1.4 Evidence of N Uptake Using
                         15N-labeled  Gases	
                  9.3.1.5 Access of NOX into Leaves	
                  9.3.1.6 Access of the Products of NOX into Cells
                  9.3.1.7 Levels of the Products of NOX in Cells  .
                  9.3.1.8 Cycling, Partitioning, and Ek'mination of
                         NO2-derived N 	
          9.3.2    Chemical and Biochemical Responses  	
                  9.3.2.1 Nitrate Reductase Activities	
                  9.3.2.2 Nitrite Reductase	
                  9.3.2.3 Glutamate Formation and Conversion .  .
                  9.3.2.4 Fluxes of Amino Acids   	
                  9.3.2.5 Effects of Ammonia	
          9.3.3    Physiological Responses 	
                  9.3.3.1 Dark Respiration 	
                  9.3.3.2 Effects on Photosynthesis	
                  9.3.3.3 Root Physiology	
          9.3.4    Tissue and Organ Responses	
                  9.3.4.1 Lipid and Membrane Effects  	
                  9.3.4.2 Changes inside Cells and Tissues	
                                   Il-xvii
                                   II-xxv

                                   9-1
                                   9-1

                                   9-2
                                   9-3
                                   9-5
                                   9-5
                                   9-8
                                   9-9
                                   9-10
                                   9-10
                                   9-11
                                   9-11
                                   9-14
                                   9-16
                                   9-16
                                   9-16
                                   9-18
                                   9-20

                                   9-21
                                   9-22
                                   9-25
                                   9-26

                                   9-29
                                   9-31
                                   9-31
                                   9-34
                                   9-36
                                   9-38
                                   9-39
                                   9-39
                                   9-40
                                   9-40
                                   9-46
                                   9-48
                                   9-48
                                   9-49
August 1'991
H-v
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                               CONTENTS (cont'd)
          9.3.5   Secondary Metabolic Responses	.  . . .
    9.4   EXPOSURE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIPS .........
          9.4.1   Foliar Injury and Loss in Aesthetic Value ......
                  9.4.1.1 Characteristics of Foliar Symptoms
                  9.4.1.2 Exposure-effect Relationships  .... .  . . .
          9.4.2.   Loss in Growth and Yield	.  ; . .
    9.5   FACTORS AFFECTING PLANT RESPONSE TO NOX . .
          9.5.1   Characteristics of the Plant	
                  9.5.1.1 Species of Plant	
                  9.5.1.2 Intraspecific Variation	
                  9.5.1.3 Stage of Development 	
          9.5.2   Environmental Conditions	'..'-..-.
                  9.5.2.1 Climatic Factors	
                  9.5.2.2 Edaphic Factors	'.;..'.
    9.6   EFFECTS OF POLLUTANT MIXTURES	-.'....
          9.6.1  -Mode of Action  . .	
                  9.6.1.1 Mode of Action of Pollutant Mixtures  . . .
          9.6.2   Exposure Response Data for Pollutant Mixtures  ..
                  9.6.2.1 Description of Foliar Injury	
          9.6.3   Losses in Growth and Yield  . . .	•':....
                  9.6.3.1 Laboratory and Greenhouse
                         Studies—Sequential Exposures  	
                  9.6.3.2 Laboratory and Greenhouse
                         Studies—Concurrent Exposure  .	
          9.6.4   Field Chamber and Field Studies	
          9.6.5   Factors Affecting Response	
                  9.6.5.1 Physical Factors	'."....
    9.7   DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY	
          9.7.1   Introduction ...:........•	 . . .  . . .
          9.7.2   Atmospheric Concentrations and Composition   . . .
                  9.7.2.1 Foreign Compounds in Plants  ........
          9.7.3   Entry and Exclusion of Gases . .  . . .  . . . . .
                  9.7.3.1 Internal Concentration of the Gases  .  . . .
                  9.7.3.2 Interfacial Movement of the Gases
                         into the Water Phase . .  . . .  . . ...  . •; .
          9.7.4   Initial Cellular Sites of Biological Interaction and '
                  Pools of Nitrogen Compounds ...'....'.... . .
                  9.7.4.1 Role of Oxides of Nitrogen in Metabolism
                  9.7.4.2 Metabolic Pathways	
                  9.7.4.3 Transport of Nitrogen Species  .......
                  9.7.4.4 Role of Cellular pH  .......:...:..
                  9.7.4.5 Reductases	 .  . '.	 . .
                  9.7.4.6 Amine Metabolism	
                                   9-50
                                   9-51
                                   9-51
                                   9-52
                                   9-54
                                   9-65
                                   9-79
                                   9-79
                                   9-79
                                   9-82
                                   9-89
                                   9-91
                                   9-92
                                   9-98
                                   9-102
                                   9-104
                                   9-104
                                   9-109
                                   9-109
                                   9-114

                                   9-115

                                   9-119
                                   9-124
                                   9-126
                                   9-126
                                   9-127
                                   9-127
                                   9-129
                                   9-131
                                   9-132
                                   9-133

                                   9-136

                                   9-137
                                   9-137
                                   9-138
                                   9-142
                                   9-144
                                   9-145
                                   9-148
August 1991
Il-vi
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                             CONTENTS (cont'd)
    9.8   REGULATORY MAINTENANCE OF REDUCED
         NITROGEN COMPOUNDS (DETOXIFICATION)  ........ . .
         9.8.1    NOX Incorporation with Non-toxic Effects
    9.9   TOXIC REACTIONS IN THE TISSUES ......... . . .
         9.9.1    Concept of Exposure Index  ..... . . ... . ,
   ,-:...•   9.9.2    Inhibited Processes  . . . ...  .............
         9.9.3    Pollutants in Combination	
    REFERENCES	 . . ...
    APPENDIX 9A	 . .  . . . -..,. .
    APPENDIX 9B	.......... ... ..,;.•.'.::

10.  THE EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES.ON NATURAL
    ECOSYSTEMS AND THEIR COMPONENTS  ............
    10.1  INTRODUCTION	
         10.1.2  Ecosystems	-..	 . ....-•. . '..;•• ...-
                 10.1.2.1   Characteristics of Ecosystems  	
                 10.1.2.2   Ecosystem Functions  ...........
  .               10.1.2.3   Ecosystem Response:  Impairment of
                          Functions, Changes in Structure . . . . .
         10.1.3  The Nitrogen Cycle	,.-.. .
                 10.1.3.1   Biological .Nitrogen Fixation .  . . . . . .
                 10.1.3.2   Assimilation		
                 10.1.3.3   Ammonification (Mineralization)  . . . .
                 10.1.3.4   Nitrification	
                 10.1.3.5   Denitrification  .......... ,
    10,2  DRY DEPOSITION RATES OF REACTIVE "N" FORMS
     .    10.2.1  Types of Measurements ........ ... .  . . . .
         10.2.2  Expressions of Deposition  . .  . ... . . ... ... :
         10.2.3  Processes Governing Deposition of Gases and
                 Particles  ............................
         10.2.4  Deposition of "N" Forms to Foliar Surfaces  . . . .
                 10.2.4.1   Nitrogen Dioxide	 . . . . .  . . . .,.• .
                 10.2.4.2   Nitric Oxide ......... .,.  .... . .
                 10l2.4.3   Nitric Acid Vapor  . . . . . ... . . . . .
                 10.2.4.4   Ammonia	
                 10.2.4.5   Particles (Nitrate and Ammonium)  . .. .
         10.2.5  Deposition of "N" Forms to Non-Foliar Surfaces .
   • 10.3  EFFECTS ON VEGETATION AND SOILS  ........ :
         10.3.1  Introduction	
         10.3.2  Pollutant N Inputs and Nitrogen Cycling in Natural
                 Ecosystems: A Brief Review	
         10.3.3  Fate of Nitrogen in Forest Ecosystems: Contrasts
                 Between Fertilizer and Pollutants . ...... ... . ...
                                 9-150
                                 9-152
                                 9-155
                                 9-155
                                 9-159
                                 9-162
                                 9-163
                                 9A-1
                                 9B-1
                                 10-1
                                 10-1
                                 10-2
                                 10-2
                                 10-3

                                 10-4
                                 10-6
                                 10-9
                                 10-9
                                 10-9
                                 10-10
                                 10-11
                                 10-11
                                 10-13
                                 10-15

                                 10-16
                                 10-18
                                 10-23
                                 10-31
                                 10-31
                                 10-33
                                 10-35
                                 10-35
                                 10-37
                                 10-37

                                 10-40

                                 10-47
August 1991
ri-vii
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                              CONTENTS (cont'd)
                 10.3.3.1   Case Studies of Forest Fertilization
                           at Differing Intervals	?  . . .        10-48
                 10.3.3.2   Fate of N from Pulse Fertilization vs.
                        ,   Atmospheric Deposition ............ .  •      10-51
          10.3.4  Effects of Pollutant N Inputs on Soils	'.        10-62
                 10.3.4.1   Soil Biota		 .,.  . . .        10-62
                 10.3.4.2   Soil Chemistry	,.,....        10-63
          10.3.5  Effects on Natural Waters ....................        10-67
          10.3.6  Effects of Pollutant N Deposition upon Vegetation
                 Nutrient Status . .  . .	''. ....        10-69
                 10.3.6.1   Physiological Effects of Excess.
                           N Inputs	        10-69
                 10.3.6.2   Soil-Mediated Effects on Vegetation  ......        10-70
                 10.3.6.3   Ecosystem-Level Responses to
                           N Deposition	   .    10-72
          10.3.7  Critical Loads for Atmospheric N Deposition	        10-73
          10.3.8  An Evaluation of Critical Loads Calculations for
                 N Deposition	.......        10-77
          10.3.9  Conclusions .	    >    10-79
    10.4   TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM EFFECTS—VEGETATION  ...        10-80
          10.4.1  Direct Effects	        10-80
          10.4.2  Indirect Effects	        10-81
          10.4.3  N Saturation, Critical Loads, and Current
                 Deposition	 . .,	        10-84
                 10.4.3.1   Critical N Loads That Have Been             ;
                           Proposed	......    ;    10-85
                 10.4.3.2   Current Rates of Total N Deposition.	        10-87
    10.5   ECOSYSTEM EFFECTS—WETLANDS AND BOGS	   ,..    10-94
          10.5.1  Introduction	        10-94
          10.5.2  Atmospheric Nitrogen Inputs	       . 10-96
          10.5.3  The Wetland Nitrogen Cycle ....:.	        10-99
          10.5,4  Effects of Nitrogen Loading on Wetland Plant       ,
                 Communities	    10-106
                 10.5.4.1   Effects on Primary Production .... . . . . . s      10-106
                 10.5.4.2   The Fate of Added Mineral Nitrogen '. . . .,,'".     10-109
                 10.5.4.3   Effects of Nitrogen Loading on ,
                           Microbial Processes	 .       10-112
                 10.5.4.4   Effects on Biotic Diversity and  ,
                           Ecosystem Structure	;....,-       10-114
                 10.5.4.5   Mechanisms of Nitrogen .Control Over  .      ,
                           Ecosystem Structure .	       10-117
    10.6   AQUATIC EFFECTS OF NITROGEN QXIDES  . . . . , .... ,       10-120
          10.6.1  Introduction	,.,.'..,........,,..'.;. .". .'       10-120
          10.6.2  The Nitrogen Cycle	       10-121
August 1991
II_viii     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                             CONTENTS (cont'd)
                 10.6.2.1   Nitrogen Inputs	
                 10.6.2.2   Transformations	 .  . . . ;. . .
                 10.6.2.3   Nitrogen Saturation  .  . .	
                 10.6.2.4   Processes Within Lakes and Streams
         10.6.3   The Effects of Nitrogen Deposition on Surface
                 Water Acidification ....................
                 10.6.3.1   Chronic Acidification  . .	 . . .
                 10.6.3.2   Episodic Acidification  ............
                 10.6.3.3   Biological Effects  ..............
         10.6.4   The Effects of Nitrogen Deposition on
                 Eutrophication	 . . . .
                 10.6.4,1   Freshwater Eutrophication	••-. . . .
                 10.6.4.2   Estuaries and Coastal Waters .	
                 10.6.4.3   Evidence for Nitrogen  Deposition Effects
                          in Estuarine Systems—Case Studies .'-...
         10.6.5   Direct Toxicity Due to Nitrogen Deposition  	
    10.7  DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY ...........  . .
         10.7.1   Introduction .........................
         10.7.2   The Nitrogen Cycle .	
         10.7.3   Nitrogen Deposition  ,	 .
         10.7.4   Effect of Deposited Nitrogen on Forest Vegetation
                 and Soils	v .........
         10.7.5   Effects of Nitrogen on Terrestrial  Vegetation	
         10.7.6   N Saturation, Critical Loads, and            '•  :
                 Current Deposition  .	.......
         10.7.7   Effects of Nitrogen on Wetlands and Bogs  . . ...  .
         10.7.8   Effects of Nitrogen on Aquatic Systems .	
                 10.7.8:1   Acidification  . . . .	..;...
                 10.7.8.2  Eutrophication 	...........
                 10.7.8.3  Direct Toxicity	
    REFERENCES	 ."..  .''.  .

11.  EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON VISIBILITY . . ,  .... .  .
    11.1  OVERVIEW OF LIGHT SCATTERING AND      : ;
         ABSORPTION   ............. . . .... . . .  . . . , .  .
    11.2  ATMOSPHERIC DISCOLORATION CAUSED BY  '•
         NITROGEN OXIDES  ... .'..".•	
    11.3  VISUAL RANGE REDUCTION CAUSED BY
         NITROGEN OXIDES	..:...
    11.4  NITRATE PHASE CHANGES AND  HYGROSCOPICITY  .
    11.5  ROLE OF NITROGEN OXIDES IN URBAN HAZE
         11.5.1   California Urban Areas ..... ; .	
         11.5.2   Urban Areas in the Western  United States .... .".'.
                                 Page

                                 10-123
                                 10-125
                                 10-130
                                 10-135

                                 10-140
                                 10-141
                                 10-148
                                 10-167

                                 10-167
                                 10-168
                                 10-173

                                 10-189
                                 10-203
                                 10-205
                                 10-205
                                 10-207
                                 10-207

                                 10-210
                                 10-220

                                 10-222
                                 10-225
                                 10-227
                                 10-229
                                 10-235
                                 10-237
                                 10-240

                                 11-1

                                 11-3

                                 11-9

                                 11-14
                                 11-15
                                 11-21
                                 11-25
                                  11-26
August 1991,.
Il-ix
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                              CONTENTS (cont'd)
          11.5.3  Urban Areas in the Eastern United States,
                 Europe, and Mexico .	
          11.5.4  Modeling Urban Haze Effects  . ..	
    11.6  ROLE OF NITROGEN OXIDES IN NONURBAN
          REGIONAL HAZE	,	 ...  ..!....
          11.6.1  Nonurban Areas of the Western United States  ...
          11.6.2  Nonurban Areas of the Eastern United States .  . -.  .
          11.6.3  Modeling Regional Haze Effects .  . . <  ......  .
    11.7  ROLE OF NITROGEN OXIDES IN PLUME VISUAL
          IMPACT	
    11.8  CONTRIBUTIONS OF NITROGEN OXIDES TO THE
          LIGHT EXTINCTION BUDGET	
    11.9  SUMMARY OF EFFECTS ON VISIBILITY	
    11.10  ECONOMIC VALUATION OF EFFECTS ON VISIBILITY
          FROM NITROGEN OXIDES  	
          11.10.1 Basic Concepts of Economic Valuation   	
          11.10.2 Economic Valuation Methods for Visibility	
                 11.10.2.1 Contingent Valuation Method  	
                 11.10.2.2 Hedonic Property Value Method  ....
          11.10.3 Studies of Economic Valuation of Visibility  ....
                 11.10.3.1 Economic Valuation Studies for Air
                          Pollution Plumes	
                 11.10.3.2 Economic Valuation Studies for
                          Urban Haze	
          11.10.4 Conclusions	
    REFERENCES	

12. EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON MATERIALS	
    12.1  INTRODUCTION  . .	
          12.1.1  Environmental Exposures to Materials	
          12.1.2  Mechanisms of Materials Damage  	
          12.1.3  Deposition Processes  	
          12.1.4  Chemical Interactions of Nitrogen Oxide Species  .
          12.1.5  Materials Damage Experimental Techniques  ....
    12.2  EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON DYES
          AND TEXTILES	
          12.2.1  Fading of Dyes by Nitrogen Oxides  	
          12.2.2  Degradation of Textile Fibers by Nitrogen Oxides  .
    12.3  EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON PLASTICS
          AND ELASTOMERS   	
          12.3.1  Chemical Changes Induced by Nitrogen Oxides  ..
    12.4  EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON METALS	
          12.4.1  Role of Nitrogen Oxides in the Corrosion Process  .
                                                                      Page
                                  11-28
                                  11-29

                                  11-29
                                  11-30
                                  11-31
                                  11-31
                                  - i
                                  11-33

                                  11-36
                                 ,11-42

                                  11-43
                                  11-44
                                  11-45
                                  11-45
                                  11-46
                                  11-47

                                  11-47

                                  11-50
                                  11-54
                                  11-56

                                  12-1
                                  12-1
                                  12-2
                                  12-2
                                  12-3
                                  12-8
                                  12-10

                                  12-11
                                  12-11
                                  12-14

                                  12-14
                                  12-14
                                  12-16
                                  12-16
August 1991
II-x
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                           CONTENTS (cont'd)
         12.4.2   Effect of Nitrogen Oxides on Economically
                Important Metals	
         12.4.3   Effects of Nitrogen, Oxides on Electronics .
    12.5  EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON PAINTS .
    12.6  EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON STONE
         AND CONCRETE . .  . . ..............
    12.7  EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON PAPER
         AND ARCHIVAL MATERIALS  .	 . ..
    12.8  COSTS OF MATERIALS DAMAGE FROM    '
         NITROGEN OXIDES	
    12.9  SUMMARY OF THE EFFECTS OF NITROGEN.
         OXIDES ON MATERIALS	 •., .
    REFERENCES		
                                                               Page
                       12-18
                       12-22
                       12-24

                       12-25

                       12-27

                       12-28

                       12-30
                       12-32
August 1991 .
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                     TABLES
 Number
 9-1        Adsorption Capacities of Activated Charcoal at One-fifth       ,             ,,
           of the U.S. OSHA Permissible Exposure Limits (PEL)
           Set for People	        9-7

 9-2        Rates of NO2 Absorbed and Stomatal Conductances in
           8 Herbaceous Species	 .	        9-22

 9-3        Compilation of Occurrence of Foliar Symptoms in Long-term        -       ;
           or Intermittent Exposures to NOX in Experimental
           Investigations	        9-59

 9-4        Some Effects of NOX on the Growth and Yield of Plants
           with Respect  to Concentrations and Exposures Used in
           Experimental Investigations	,.  . .	        9-68  ,

 9-5        Relative Sensitivities of Plants to Nitrogen Dioxide	  .        9-8Q

 9-6        Intraspecific Differences in the Responses of Plants to                        ;
           Nitrogen Oxides	        9-83

 9-7        Visible Injury in Controlled Exposures to NOX Mixtures  .....        9-111

 9-8        Visible Injury in Field Chamber and Field Exposures to                    .
           NOX Mixtures	    9-113

 9-9        Growth/Yield in Controlled Exposures to NOX Mixtures  .....  -,,-    9-116

 9-10       Growth/Yield in Field Chamber and Field Exposures to
           NOX Mixtures	f	        9-125

 9-11       Types of Oxides of Nitrogen in the Gaseous Phase of
           an Atmosphere	 , . . .... .  . .,..:,.    9-130

 9-12       Possible Reactions Between Nitrogen Dioxide and
           Nitric Oxide,  and Water	   •     9-132

 9-13       Enzyme Parameters for Critical Enzymatic Steps in
           Plant Use of Nitrogen Compounds	,...  .        9-14,7

9A        Species of Plants Used in Experimental Studies on       ; .',     ,  •
           the Effects of Oxides  of Nitrogen  	        9A-2

9B        Tabulation of Effects of NOX on Growth, Reproduction,
           and Yield of Plants in Experimental Investigations	        9B-2

August 1991              •            Il-xii       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                 TABLES (cont'd)
Number

10-1      Factors Influencing Dry Deposition of Reactive
          Nitrogen Compounds	

10-2      Conductance (Kj) of NO2 to Leaf Surfaces   	

10-3      Deposition Velocity (Vd) of NO2 to Plant Canopy Surfaces  .

10-4      Conductance (%) of NO to Leaf Surfaces  ...........

10-5      Deposition Velocity (Vd) of NO to Plant Canopy Surfaces   .

10-6      Conductance (Kj) of HNO3 to Leaf Surfaces  	

10-7      Deposition Velocity (Vd) of HNO3 to Canopy Surfaces .  .  .

10-8      Conductance (Kj) of NH3 to Leaf Surfaces	 .  .  .

10-9      Deposition Velocity (Vd) of NH3 to Plant Canopy Surfaces  .

10-10     Measured Deposition Velocities of Nitrate (NO3~) and
          Ammonium (NH4+)	

10-11     Conductance (Kj) of Non-Foliar Surfaces to Reactive
          Nitrogen Gases	  .  .

10-12     Nitrogen Fertilizer Recovery by Vegetation and Soils in
          Various Studies	 .  .  .

10-13     Nitrogen Inputs, Outputs, and Vegetation Increments in
          Various Forest Ecosystems	  .

10-14     Measurements of Various Forms of Annual N Deposition to
          North American and European Ecosystems	

10-15     Mean Annual Wet Nitrate and Ammonium Deposition to
          Various States Located Throughout the United States	

10-16     Nitrogen Input/Output Relationships for Several Ecosystems

10-17     Bulk Deposition of Nitrogen  in North American Wetlands   .

10-18     Nitrogen Budgets of Selected Wetlands	
                          Page


                           10-17

                           10-20

                           10-23

                           10-24

                           10-24

                           10-25

                           10-26

                           10-27

                           10-28


                           10-29


                           10-36


                           10-53


                           10-57


                           10-88


                           10-90

                           10-92

                           10-98

                           10-101
August 1991
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Number

 10-19


 10-20


 10-21



 10-22



 10-23
10-24
10-25
10-26
                                  TABLES (cont'd)
Results of Nitrogen Fertilization Experiments in Wetland
Ecosystems	

Rates of Nitrogen Deposition in Several Areas of
North America	

Concentrations of Nitrate, Sulfate, and Ratios of Nitrate to
the Sum of Nitrate and Sulfate in Runoff Waters in
Acidified Areas of the World .	
Concentrations of Nitrate, Sulfate, and Ratios of Nitrate
to the Sum of Nitrate and Sulfate in Streams of Acid-sensitive
Regions of the United States. Values are Medians for Region  . ,

Estimates of the Number and Proportion of Chronically and
Episodically Acidic Lakes and Stream Reaches in the Eastern
United States. Chronic Conditions Based on Random Sample of
Systems During Index Conditions (Spring Baseflow or Fall
Overturn).  Episodic Conditions Estimated from Two-box
Mixing Model (for Streams), or Empirical Relationships
Between Fall Index Period and Spring Snow Melt
Chemistry (for Lakes)  ....,'.		 .
Page


10-107


10-124



10-143



10-145
                                                                            10-150
Slopes of Nitrate Trends Ofeq-L^-yr"1) in Catskill Streams
Before 1945, Between 1945 and 1970, and After 1970.  Slopes
for Each Period Are Calculated from Best-fit Regression Lines
(Analysis of Covariance on Ranks) Fitted to Data from the
Entire Period of Record.  All Trends Are Significant at
p <0.05	

Trends in Nitrate Concentrations for Adirondack Long-term
Monitoring Lakes.  Slopes are Calculated from Best-fit
Regression Lines (Using Ancova on Ranks; Loftis et al.,
1989) Fitted to Data.  Data are from Driscoll et al.
(in review)	

Estimated Number and Proportion of Nitrogen-Limited Lakes in
Subregions of the United States Sampled by the National
Surface Water Survey.  Estimates are Based on Molar Ratios of
Total Inorganic Nitrogen Concentrations (Nitrate + Ammonium)
to Total Phosphorus Concentrations	
                                                                            10-162
                                                                            10-164
                                                                            10-172
August 1991
                                       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                  TABLES (cont'd)
Number

10-27      Molar Ratios of Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen (DIN) to
           Dissolved Inorganic Phosphorus (DIP) in a Variety
           of Estuaries	,	 •

10-28      Three Nitrogen Budgets for the Chesapeake Bay  . . . .  .

10-29      Watershed Retention of Nitrogen in Watersheds in or Near
           the Chesapeake Bay Basin, from Published Reports.  All
           Nitrogen Loads Have Been Re-estimated Based on Measured
           Wet Deposition, and a 35% Contribution to Total
           Deposition from Dry Deposition	

10-30      Mean Deposition Characteristics of Reactive Nitrogen Gases
           at the Leaf or Canopy Scale of Resolution for Crop or
           Tree Species	  . .  . .

10-31      Mean Annual Wet Nitrate and Ammonium Deposition to
           Various States Located Throughout the United States ......

10-32      Measurements of Various Forms of Annual Nitrogen
           Deposition to North American and European Ecosystems.
           Measurements of Total Deposition Data That Do Not Include
           Both a Wet and Dry Estimate Probably Underestimate Total
           Nitrogen Deposition and Are Enclosed in Parentheses .  ... ,

10-33      Nitrogen Fertilizer Recovery by Vegetation and Soils in
           Various Studies . .	 . . .	. .  . .  .

10-34      Nitrogen Inputs, Outputs, and Vegetation Increments in
           Various Forest Ecosystems	.'..:.

10-35      Three Nitrogen Budgets for, the Chesapeake Bay  .  .'. .  . .  .

11-1       Wavelength Dependence of Light Scattering Coefficient as
           a Function of Particle Size Distribution	

11-2       Nitrogen Dioxide Contributions to Total Light Extinction ..

11-3       Nitrate Contributions to Total Light Extinction  ........

,11-4       Percentage Contribution of Nitrogen Oxides to Total Light
           Extinction	
                                    Page



                                    10-179

                                    10-193
                                     10-198
                                     10-208
                                     10-211
                                     10-212


                                     10-215


                                     10-216

                                     10-238


                                     11-13

                                     11-37

                                     11-39


                                     11-42
August 1991
II-xv
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                 TABLES (cont'd)
 Number


 11-5      Economic Valuation Studies for Air Pollution Plumes

 11-6      Economic Valuation Studies on Urban Haze	
 12-1



 12-2



 12-3
Smog Chamber Reactions of NO2 and C3H3 and Deposition
of Reaction Products on Galvanized Steel  	
Smog Chamber Reactions of NO2, C3H3, and SO2 and
Deposition of Reaction Products on Galvanized Steel . .
Deposition Velocities of NO2 and NO for Interior Materials  . .  .
Page


11-48


11-51



12-5



12-6


12-9
August 1991
                                    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                       FIGURES
. Number

 9-1         Propylene and NO oxidation under artificial illumination  .  ...

.9-2         The cyclic interaction of free radicals, hydrocarbons,,NO,
            NO2 and ultraviolet radiation in photochemical smog  	

 9T3         Phase interaction diagram for pollutant scavenging processes  .

 9-4         Important interconversions of the different forms of NOX after
.  - .         combustion in the atmosphere and, in. aqueous solutions in
            contact with atmospheres containing  NOX	  .

 9-5         Likely access routes for NOX into a plant leaf	

 9-6         Uptake and metabolic pathways involved in the uptake of
            NOX into plant leaf tissue from the atmosphere	

 9-7         The possible interconversions between glutamate,  glutamine
            and a-ketoglutarate which involve the uptake and  release
            of ammonia in plants	

 9-8         Minimum exposures to NO2 required to produce 5% foliar
            injury on sensitive, intermediate,  and tolerant categories of
            plants  	

 9-9         Occurrence or absence of foliar injury from NOX  in long-term
            experimental exposures	

 9-10       Exposures employed in experimental investigations on the
            effect of NOX on growth and yield of plants	

 9-11  •     Experimental exposures to NOX resulting in the occurrence  of
            increased, decreased, or unaffected growth or yield  in tomato

 9-12       Experimental exposures to NOX resulting in increased,
            decreased, or unaffected growth or yield in green bean  ....

 9-13       Relation between uptake of NO2  in the dark and in  the light
            for nine cultivars of Kentucky bluegrass; values are
            A min"1 dm"2 leaf area X 10~2	
                           Page
                           9-12

                           9-13



                           9-17

                           9-24.


                           9-27



                           9-37



                           9-57


                           9-64


                           9-66


                           9-74


                           9-75



                           9-90
 •August 1991}; ,  j,;
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                  FIGURES (cont'd)
Number

9-14       Variations in sensitivity of oat seedlings to foliar injury from
           NO2 with hour of the day in light and darkness (after an Haut
           and Stratmann, 1967)	

9-15       Effects of exposure to 0, 0.02, 0.1, or 0.5 ppm NO? on the dry
           weight of roots and shoots of bean seedlings grown in solutions
           containing 0, 1, 5, 10, or 20 mM nitrate	

9-16       A schematic of the movement of gaseous oxides of nitrogen
           into the mesophyll cells of plant leaves	

9-17       The relationship between applied nitrogen, soil nitrogen,
           and biomass production for a C4 grass	

9-18       Schematic of the distribution of a weak base or acid across
           a biological membrane	

9-19       A generalized pathway of amino acid biosynthesis involving
           the chloroplast within the leaf	

9-20       The relationship between the onset of either foliar lesions
           or metabolic and growth effects and the effective dose of NO2 .

9-21       Diagram of studies of NOX on plant productivity	

10-1       Schematic representation of the nitrogen cycle, emphasizing
           human activities that affect fluxes of nitrogen	

10-2       Predicted deposition velocities (Vd) at 1 meter for a
           friction velocity of 30 cm s"1 and particle densities of
           1,4, and 11.5 g cm"3	

10-3       Schematic representation of the response of natural
           ecosystems to nutrient inputs	

10-4       Schematic representation of the fate of incoming N in
           N-poor, fertilized, and high-N input systems	

10-5       Soil solution nitrate concentrations in untreated control,
           annually fertilized (100 kg urea-N ha"1 yr"1) and
           quarterly-fertilized (25 kg urea-N ha"1 3 mo-1) loblolly
           pine plots	
                                      Page



                                      9-95



                                      9-103


                                      9-128


                                      9-141


                                      9-143


                                      9-149


                                      9-151

                                      9-157


                                      10-7



                                      10-19


                                      10-39


                                      10-42
                                       10-49
August 1991
H-xviii     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                  FIGURES (cont'd)
Number
10-6       Top:  Growth of loblolly pine in untreated, annual
           (100 kg urea-N ha"1 yr"1) and quarterly (Q) (25 kg
           urea-N ha"1 3 mo"1) applications of urea-N	         10-50

10-7       Soil solution nitrate concentrations in untreated, single
           (450 kg N ha"1), and multiple (37.5 kg urea-N ha"1, 3 times)
           applications of urea-N		         10-52

10-8       Ecosystem recovery of fertilizer N as a function of
           fertilizer N input	         10-54

10-9  ,     Tree recovery of fertilizer N as a function of fertilizer
           N input	         10-55

10-10      Soil recovery of fertilizer N as a function of fertilizer
           N input	 .         10-56

10-11      Ecosystem' N retention as a function of atmospheric N input  ....         10-58

10-12      Tree N increment as a function of atmospheric N input	         10-59

10-13      Calculated soil N retention (Input-increment-leaching) as a
           function of atmospheric N input	         10-60

10-14      N leaching as a function of atmospheric N input minus tree
           N increment	 .         10-61

10-15      Schematic diagram of cation exchange for base cations, A13 +
           and H+ in circumneutral (50% base saturation) and acid (10%
           base saturation) soils	  .	         10-64

10-16      Schematic diagram of cation exchange for base cations, A13 +
           and H+ in acid soils with low and high atmospheric deposition
           rates		         10-66

10-17      Map of the United States showing location of the major groups
           of inland freshwater marshes		         10-96

10-18      Distribution of North American peatlands	         10-102

10-19      Conceptual relationships among trends in nitrogen cycling,
           productivity, and species diversity along a gradient from
           oligotrophic (nutrient-poor) to eutrophic  (nutrient-rich)
           habitats	         10-105

August 1991                             H-xix      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                  FIGURES (cont'd)
Number

10-20      Distribution of 2,164 Central European plant species in the
           gradient of nitrogen indicator values		

10-21      Distribution of Central European plant species along a gradient
           of nitrogen indicator values (see Figure 10-20) across
           ecosystem types	

10-22      A simplified watershed nitrogen cycle	

10-23      The effect of nitrogen transformations on the watershed
           hydrogen ion budget	

10-24      Hypothetical time course of forest ecosystem response to
           chronic nitrogen additions	

10-25      Relationship between median wet deposition of nitrogen
           (NO3~  + NH4+) and median surface water nitrogen
           (NO3"  + NH4+) concentrations, for physiographic
           districts within the National Stream Survey that have
           minimal agricultural activity	

10-26      Effect of baseline acid neutralizing capacity (ANC) and
           episodic conditions  in Adirondack lakes .	

10-27      Temporal patterns in the chemical characteristics of
           stream  water at Pancake-Hall Creek in the Adirondacks	

10-28      Temporal patterns in chemical characteristics of stream
           water at Biscuit Brook in the Catskill Mountains  	

10-29      Outflow chemistry from two snowmelt seasons (1986
           and 1987) at Emerald Lake,  a high elevation lake in the
           Sierra Nevada mountains of California	

10-30      Relationship between nitrate concentration and stream discharge
           for four Catskill streams during four most recent decades:
           Schoharie Creek at  Prattsville, Neversink River at Prattsville,
           Rondout Creek at Lowes Corners, and Esopus Creek at
           Coldbrook	 .  .

10-31      Temporal patterns in lake water NO3" concentration for two
           Adirondack lakes, Constable Pond, and Heart Lake  	
                                      10-115



                                      10-116

                                      10-122


                                      1Q-127


                                      10-132
                                      10-147


                                      10-153


                                      10-154


                                      10-155



                                      10-158
                                      10-163


                                      10-165
August 1991
H-xx
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                  FIGURES (cont'd)
Number

10-32      Concentrations of mean algal chlorophyll, and annual
           maximum chlorophyll, in the mid region of various
           estuaries and in the MERL experimental ecosystems
           as a function of the input of dissolved inorganic
           nitrogen	,	,	

10-33      Ecosystem recovery of fertilizer N as a function of
           fertilizer N input	, . . . ......

10-34      Ecosystem N retention as a function of atmospheric N input  .

10-35      Location of acid-sensitive lakes and streams in the
           northeastern United States where the importance of NO3" to
           seasonal water chemistry can be determined	 .

10-36      Location of acid-sensitive lakes and streams in the.
           southeastern United States where the importance of NO3~ to
           seasonal water chemistry can be determined  .	 .

10-37      Location of acid-sensitive lakes and streams in the western
           United States where the importance of NO3~ to seasonal water
           chemistry can be determined	 .	

10-38      Relationship between  median wet deposition of nitrogen
           (NO3~ + NH4+) and median surface water nitrogen
   , ..      (NO3~ + NH4+) concentrations, for physiographic districts
           within the  National Stream Survey that have minimal
           agricultural activity	

11-1       The family of nitrogen oxides and those that impair visibility .

11-2       Schematic  of an elemental volume of haze along a line
           of sight	

11-3       Effect of a. homogeneous atmosphere on light intensity of  .
           bright and dark objects as a  function of distance along
           a line of sight		•,....

11-4       Light extinction efficiency at X = 0.55 /xm as a function of
           particle size for soot and for typical, nonabsorbing
           atmospheric, aerosol	
                                      10-186


                                      10-217

                                      10-218



                                      10-231



                                      10-232



                                      10-233
                                      10-234

                                      11-2


                                      11-4



                                      11-6



                                      11-7
August 1991
H-xxi      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Number
 11-5
 11-6
 11-7


 11-8
11-9
11-11
12-1
                                   FIGURES (cont'd)
           Light absorption efficiency of nitrogen dioxide as a
           function of the wavelength of light in the visible
           spectrum, 0.4 jt*m < A < 0.7 /tm	
                                                                                11-11
           Effect of nitrogen dioxide on horizon sky brightness as
           a function of the wavelength of light; relative horizon
           brightness, bext/(bext + bag) for selected values of the
           product of NO2 concentration and visual range assuming
           that bext = 3/(visual range)  .	
           Effect on visual range of incrementally adding 1 jtig/m3 of
           fine particles having a light extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g

           Light scattering coefficient for 1 pg/m3 of sulfate or
           nitrate aerosol as a function of relative humidity; bscat
           versus relative humidity for ammonium sulfate aerosol
           (having particle size distributions characterized by
           Dg = 0.2 /inland ag = 1.01, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5) ......
                                                                                11-12
                                                                     11-16
                                                                                11-20
           Light scattering coefficient for 1 jttg/m3 of sulfate or
           nitrate aerosol as a function of relative humidity; bscat
           versus relative humidity for ammonium sulfate aerosol
           showing the effect of hysteresis	
                                                                                11-21
11-10      Light scattering coefficient for 1 jwg/m3 of sulfate or
           nitrate aerosol as a function of relative humidity; bscat
           versus relative humidity,for ammonium nitrate aerosol
           (having particle size distributions characterized by
                        and a  = 1.01,  1.5, and 2.0)  ......
Dg = 0.6
                                                                                11-22
           Light scattering coefficient for 1 /*g/m3 of sulfate or
           nitrate aerosol as a function of relative humidity; bscat
           versus relative humidity for externally and internally mixed
           sulfate and nitrate aerosols (S:N = 3:1) for indicated size
           distributions (Dgi) ag)	
                                                                                11-23
11-12      Light scattering coefficient for 1 jtig/m3 of sulfate or nitrate
           aerosol as a function of relative humidity; bscat versus
           relative humidity for externally and internally mixed sulfate
           and nitrate aerosols (S:N =  1:2) for indicated size
           distributions (D_, a )	
                         o   o
           Bar graph of NO2 removal rate for various materials evaluated
           in a 1.64 m3 test chamber at 50% RH  	
                                                                                11-24
                                                                                12-7
August 1991
                                        H-xxii     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR

-------
                                    AUTHORS
                  Chapter 9:  Effects of Nitrogen Oxides on Vegetation
Dr. J.H.B. Garner
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Dr. Beverley A. Hale
Department of Horticultural Science
University of Guelph
Guelph, Ontario, Canada NIG 2W1
                         ,-,'-.

Dr. Robert Heath
Department of Botany and Plant Sciences
University of California
Riverside, CA 92507

Dr. Delbert C. McCune
Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research
  at Cornell University
Tower Road
Ithaca,  NY  14853
         Dr. David C. MacLean
         Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research
          at Cornell University
         Tower Road
         Ithaca,  NY  14853

         Dr. David T. Tingey
         Environmental Research Laboratory
         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
         200 SW 35th Street
         Corvallis, OR 97333

         Dr. A. R. Wellburn
         Department of Biochemistry
         Biological Science Building
         University of'Lancaster, LAI 4YQ
         United Kingdom
                  Chapter 10: Effect of Nitrogen Oxides on Ecosystems
Dr. J.H.B. Garner
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711

Dr. Paul J. Hanson
Environmental Sciences Division
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Automated Sciences Group
Oak Ridge, TN  37831

Dr. Dale W. Johnson
Biological Sciences Division
Desert Research Institute
P.O. Box 60220
Reno, Nevada  89509
         Dr. James T. Morris
         Department of Biology
         University of South Carolina
         Columbia, SC 29208

         Dr. John Stoddard '
         Environmental Research Laboratory
         Watershed Branch
         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
         200 SW 35th Street     '
         Corvallis, OR 97333

         Dr. David T. Tingey
         Environmental Research Laboratory
         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
         200 SW 35th Street
         Corvallis, OR 97333
 August 1991
II-xxiii     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                     .,  ..  ,     AUTHORS, (cont'd)

                  Chapter 11:  Effects of Nitrogen Oxides on .Visibility
Mr. Douglas A. Latimer
Latimer & Associates
2769 Iris Avenue  ,
Suite 117
Boulder, CO  80304

Ms. Lauraine G, Chestnut
R.C.G./Hagler BaHly & Company
1881 Ninth Street
Suite 201
Boulder, CO  80302
         Dr. Robert D. Rowe
         R.C.G./Hagler Bailly & Company
         1881 Ninth Street       *
         Suite 201
         Boulder, CO 80302
                  Chapter 12:  Effects of Nitrogen Oxide on Materials
Mr. Douglas R. Murray
TRC Environmental Consultants
800 Connecticut Boulevard
East Hartford, CT 06108
August 1991
H-xxiv  .   DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                        CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS
                                 Chapters 9 and 10
Dr. Dennis Baldocchi
Atmospheric Turbulence & Diffusion Division
NOAA
P.O. Box 2456                      ,
Oak Ridge, TN 37831

Dr. Michael Berry
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Dr. William B. Bowden
Department of Forest Resources
James Hall
University of New Hampshire
Durham, NH 03824

Prof. Dr. Robert Guderian
Universitat Gesamthochscule Essen
Postfach 103 764- 4300
Essen 1 Germany

Walter W. Heck
USDA/ARS  .
North Carolina State University
1509 Varsity Drive
Raleigh, NC  27606

Dr. George Hendry
Environmental Biotechnology Division
Building 318
Brookhaven National Laboratories
Upton, NY  11973

Dr. Allen  Legge
Alberta Research Council
Environmental Research and Engineering
  Department, 3rd Floor
6815 8th Street N.E.       ,   ,
Calgary, Alberta T2E 7H7
Canada
         Dr. William McFee
         Department of Agronomy
         Lilly Hall
         Purdue University
         West Lafayette, IN 47609

         Dr. David McKee
         Office Air Quality Planning and Standards
         U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
         Research Triangle Park, .NC 27711  ._..

         Dr. Joseph Miller
         AIR Programs
         North Carolina State University
         1509 Varsity Drive        .......
         Raleigh, NC  27606            , /  :  :

         Dr. Eva Pell
         Department of Plant Pathology
         211 Buckhout Laboratory
         Pennsylvania State University
         University Park, PA 16802

         Dr. Richard Reinert
         AIR Programs
         North Carolina State University
         1509 Varsity Drive
         Raleigh, NC  27606

         Dr. Paul Ringold
         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
         401 M Street, SW
         Washington,  DC  20406

         Ms. Rosalina Rodriquez
         Office of Air Quality Planning and
          Standards
         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
         Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
August 1991
II-xxv      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                     CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS (cont'd)
Mr. Kenneth Stolte
National Park Service
Air Quality Division
12795 W. Alameda Parkway
Lakewood, CO 80255

Dr. R.A. Skeffington
National Power Technology and Environmental
  Center
Kelvin Avenue
Leatherhead, Surrey KT22 7SE
United Kingdom

Dr. John Skelly
Department of Plant Pathology
212a Buckhout Laboratory
Pennsylvania State University
University Park, PA  16802
          Dr. Timothy C. Strickland, -.-•'•
          Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
          Watershed Branch                 .    •...'•
          U.S. Environmental.Protection Agency <  '•'  '
          Corvallis, OR 97333   -  ;       ,    >-   ;

          Dr. George E. Taylor, Jr.                 :
          Biological Sciences Center
          Desert Research Institute
          P.O. Box 60220
          Reno, NV  89506-0220      :            , :

          Dr. C. Ray Thompson
          2032 Fairview Avenue
          Riverside, CA 92506

          Dr. Gary Whiting   •     ;           :
          3 Holiday Drive = :    .    ;     '
          Hampton, VA 23669        :.
                                     Chapter 11
Mr. Allen C. Basala
Air Quality Management Division
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Dr. Michael Berry
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Ms. F. Vandiver Bradow            ,     ,
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Ms. Darcy Campbell
Radian Corporation
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
(Formerly with U.S. Environmental Protection
 Agency)
         Dr. LelandB. Deck
         Air Quality Management Division
         Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
         Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

         Dr. Thomas G.  Dzubay           ,
         Atmospheric Research and Exposure
           Assessment Laboratory     •!• •   '  •   •  •
         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency     .
         Research Triangle Park, NC 27711       r

         Dr. Thomas G.  Ellestad
         Atmospheric Research and Exposure
           Assessment Laboratory
         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
         Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
August 1991
Il-xxvi
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                     CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS (cont'd)
Dr. Charles W. Lewis
Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment
  Laboratory
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, 'NC 27711

Mr. Robert K. Stevens  s
Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment
  Laboratory
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
          Ms. Beverly E. Tilton
          Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
          Research Triangle Park, NC  27711
                                     Chapter 12
Dr. Micheal Berry
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Ms. F. Vandiver Bradow
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711   .

Ms. Darcy Campbell
Radian Corporation
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
(Formerly with U.S. Environmental Protection
 Agency)

Dr. Thomas  Graedel                •
AT&T Laboratories
600 Mountain Avenue
Murray Hill, NJ  07974-2070
          Mr. Fred H. Haynie
          Private Consultant
          300 Oakridge Road   ;                •
          Gary, NC 27511

          Dr. Frederick Lipfert
          Private Consultant
          23 Carll Court
          Northport, NY 11768

          Mr. John W.\Spenoe '
          Atmospheric Research and Exposure
           Assessment Laboratory       •
          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
          Research Triangle Park, NC  27711

          Ms. Beverly E. Tilton    •   •  ^     ••'
          Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
          Research Triangle Park, NC  27711
August 1991
II-xxvii    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
           9.   EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES  ON
                                VEGETATION
9.1 INTRODUCTION
     Of the various nitrogen oxides (NOX) in the ambient air (Chapter 7) only nitric oxide
(NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) are considered important phytotoxicants.  The effects of
nitrogen oxides on terrestrial vegetation can range from the molecular to the organismal, and
then to the ecosystem level.  The occurrence and magnitude of the vegetational effects depend
on the concentration of the pollutant,  the duration of the exposure, the length of time between
exposures, and the various environmental and biological factors that influence the response.
Some of the earliest observable physiological effects include changes in carbon dioxide
fixation (photosynthesis), alterations in specific enzymes, changes in metabolite pools, and
alterations in the translocation of photosynthate.  Biochemical changes within the plants are
often expressed as visible foliar injury, premature senescence, increased leaf abscission, and
reduced plant growth and yield.  These changes at the individual plant level lead  to altered
reproduction, changes in competitive ability, or reduction of plant vigor.  They subsequently
are manifested by changes in plant communities and, ultimately, changes in ecosystems.  The
linkages among altered biochemical processes,  foliar injury, and reduced plant yield are not
well understood. Likewise, no clear relationship exists between foliar injury and reduced
plant yield for species in which the foliage is not part of the yield.
     In this chapter,  the general methodologies used in studies  of air pollution effects are
discussed first, to provide a basis for understanding the methods, approaches, and
experimental designs  used in the studies presented later.  In addition, the direct effects of
NOX on vegetation are reviewed with  emphasis on studies relating effects to known exposure
concentrations and durations of NO and NO2.  Factors that influence plant response to
nitrogen oxides are also included.  Since most  available data pertained to NO2, this pollutant
receives the most attention.  Because of the possibility that  the pollutant mixtures may exert
effects at Combinations lower than either gas alone, effects  of NO2 in combination with other
pollutants is evaluated.  Effects of nitrogen deposition, critical loads and effects on  ecosystem
processes are reviewed in Chapter 10.  Nitrogen oxides are intimately involved in the
       August 1991
                                         9-1
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
formation of ozone and other photochemical oxidants. The effects of these chemicals on
plants are reviewed in Air Quality Criteria for Ozone and Other Photochemical Oxidants
(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1986).
     Information from the previous NOX criteria document (U.S Environmental Protection ,
Agency,  1982) considered of fundamental importance is discussed and related to more recent
studies.  All data that relate exposure-response information to yield loss or crop loss were
drawn directly from primary references, regardless of their citation in the previous criteria
document.  Generally, only published materials that have undergone scientific review have
been cited. Data used in the development of this chapter were derived from a range of
diverse studies that were conducted to determine the effects of nitrogen oxides on various
plant species and to characterize plant responses. The studies cited were generally conducted
to test specific biological hypotheses or to produce  specific biological data rather than to
develop air quality criteria.
9.2  IMDETHODOLOGIES USED IN VEGETATION EFFECTS RESEARCH
     In vegetation effects research, the choice of methodologies (study design and data
analysis procedures, chamber type, field vs. laboratory) is crucial to the interpretation and
subsequent applicability of experimental results.  Prior to initiation of a study, the desired
outcome should be carefully evaluated.  Is the goal to develop pollutant exposure-plant
response models which may be applied to vegetation growing outdoors or rather to develop
models describing mechanisms of action at  the cellular level?  Is the study to provide some
information on a large number of species or cultivars or rather a great deal of information on
a few?  Are factors which may modify plant response to pollutant exposure under
investigation?  The answers to these and other questions provide the framework for choosing
chamber type, exposure concentration, duration and frequency, plant species  and
developmental stage,  response variables, replication and blocking plans, as well as statistical ,
treatment of the data.  This section discusses the various methods used to determine plant
response to oxides of nitrogen, including experimental  design and data analyses, exposure
systems, pollutant climatology and chemistry, and terminology.
       August 1991
                                         9-2
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1      9.2.1  Experimental Design and Statistical Analyses
  2           Experimental design refers to the relationship in space and time among replications (or
  3      blocks within replications) and treatment factors. In pollution studies, the toxic and diffusive
  4      nature of the gases means that in the vast majority of experiments, containment chambers
  5      must be used to separate treatments.  Depending on the number of chambers available at any
  6      one time, randomized complete or incomplete block designs (RCBD, RIBD) are most
  7      commonly used, frequently blocked over time.  Completely randomized designs (CRD,  in
  8      which all replications of all treatments are carried out at the same time) are relatively
  9      uncommon due to the high cost of chamber installation.  In experiments where factors in
10      addition to concentration of NO2 are being investigated, the number of treatments increases
11'"'    and study design becomes more complicated.  A multi-factor experiment may be conducted as
12      a full (all combinations of factor levels) or partial (some combinations of factor levels)
13      factorial.  Treatment factors which can easily be confined to a potted plant (such as
14      comparisons of species,  or soil nitrogen or water status) are often included as a split-plot
15      factor in a full factorial  design, thus increasing the efficiency of data collection.  Treatment
16      factors which are not so easily contained, such as other pollutant gases, air temperature  or
17      radiation levels can be investigated in combination with NO2 concentration in partial factorial
18      designs, although this approach seems largely confined to O3/SO2 mixture studies (Ormrod
19      etal.,1984).                                                          ;
20           The simpler experimental plans described above (RCBD, CRD) are easily analyzed by
21      traditional  ANOVA techniques, where the total sum of squares is partitioned among
22      experimental factors, replicates or blocks  (known collectively as sources of variation) and
23      residual or error.  If the ANOVA is generated by a computer statistical package, each of
24      these sources of variation is compared to the error mean 'square by an F test to determine the
25      probability (P value) that there is a difference among treatments.  If the P value for any
26      experimental factor is less than 5% (this threshold can be as1 high as 10% or as low as 1%,
27  •; ''•  depending  on the importance of making Type I or Type II errors), then the treatment means
28      for the factor(s)  may be further analyzed, using suitable techniques. An excellent discussion
29      of treatment means comparison has been prepared by Chappelka and Chevone (1989).  The
30      choice of suitable analysis depends mainly on whether the levels of the factor(s) are
31      quantitative or qualitative. If they are qualitative (for example, comparison of cultivars  in
       August 1991
9-3
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1      their response to NO2) then an unplanned comparison technique such as multiple range
          , -     .     • •                                                 •' 'r',1. ,'•''• ;.K."J1.lr '"'."'', ''./1:
  2      (Duncan new, Sheffe or Student-Newman-Keul) or least significant difference test (Steel and
  3      Torrie,  1960).  Many of these tests have safeguards which reduce the danger of detecting
  4      significant treatment effects when none in fact exist.  These tests are not appropriate for
  5      qualitative treatments (for example, multiple concentrations of NO2  or other environmental
  6      quality parameters such as light level, temperature or humidity),  although they are often
  7      misused in that way.  Much less commonly utilized for qualitative factors are preplanned
  8      comparisons, which may be either orthogonal (independent) or non-orthogonal.  This
  9      approach is suitable when treatments can be grouped in various ways to generate biologically
10      interesting comparisons, and is particularly applicable to studies of pollutant mixtures.
11      A good example of this approach is given by Chappelka and Chevone (1989), where the
12      effects of SO2 and O3 on  tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) were investigated.  The
13      authors developed three orthogonal contrasts, which tested the additivity of O3 in combination
14      with SO2 (contrast 1);  the effect of SO2 + O3 on the plants  (contrast 2); and compared the
15      effects of O3 with those of SO2 (contrast 3):
16           (1) [(O3 - control)  + (SO2 - control)] = [(O3 + SO?)  - control]
17           (2) O3 + SO2 = control
18           (3) 03 = S02
19      Despite the considerable statistical power associated with these contrasts, they are rarely used
20      in air pollution studies.                                ;  •  ;   <. -v   ^
21           For quantitative treatments,  some kind of regression analysis is usually indicated. This
                                                                        '•. A- • ' 
-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
regression equation to illustrate the likely range of values for the response variable.
A nonlinear regression model may also be used to derive exposure-response functions.

9.2.2  Exposure  Systems
9.2.2.1 Supply
     The chambers  in which plants are exposed to pollutant gases are an "open" system—that
is they are continuously supplied with "fresh" air (i.e., air that has not previously been
through the chambers) which is then exhausted from the exposure system. This open system
prevents depletion of carbon dioxide by photosynthesis and also provides the means by which
the pollutant gases are delivered in constant concentration to the plant material.  In artificial
exposure experiments, NO2 is usually supplied to the chambers from pressurized cylinders
equipped with a two stage regulator.  The NO2 cylinder contains the gas in dilute form
(usually less than 5,000 ppm in nitrogen) and must be further diluted by being metered into
an air stream before the gas is introduced into the plant chamber.  This dilution and mixing
of NO2 into the air  supply of the chamber very often occurs in a pre-chamber or mixing
plenum so that the experimental material is exposed to a uniform atmosphere (Marie and
Ormrod, 1984). Cylinders of greater concentration are generally not used (although they
would  last longer, reducing handling  costs) due to the greater danger to  personnel from leaks
or accidental releases.
     Nitrogen dioxide for plant exposure can also be generated in the laboratory by any  one
of several methods.  Some studies have produced NO2 from liquid N2O4, provided that the
container of N2O4 is kept at or above 25 °C, which vaporizes N2O4 to NO2. The NO2  is
then delivered to the air supply to the exposure chambers through flow meters or needle
valves  (Fuhrer and Erismann, 1980;  Maclean et  al.,  1968; Spielings, 1971). Chemical
reactions can produce NO2 in the laboratory for the purposes of plant exposure, but they are
instantaneous reactions, and so are difficult to maintain for the purpose of metering into plant
chambers for a long period of time.  Nitrogen dioxide may be produced by the  following
reactions (Sinn et al.,  1984):
     (i)    heating  lead nitrate
           2Pb(NO3)2 <-» 2PbO + 4NO2 + O2
        August 1991
                                          9-5
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
(ii)   combining nitric acid and copper chips
      Cu + 4HNO3(conc) <-••  Cu(NO3)2 + 2NO2 + 2H2O
(iii) combining nitric acid and sodium nitrate
                      3(dil) ^ NaNO3 + 2NO2 + H2O.
            NaNO  + 2HNO
 Nitrogen dioxide can also be generated by bubbling air through concentrated hot (83 °C)
 HNO3 (Oleksyn, 1984):
2HNO  «-»• 2NO
                         H2O
                                       1/2O.
 The advantage of these methods of NO2 production is that they cost much less than
 pressurized cylinders, so are useful to laboratories which are less well equipped.  There is a
 disadvantage in these methods,  however, in that the production of NO2 is highly variable,
 making good replication of experiments difficult.
      Fumigation studies using NQX usually employ activated charcoal to remove atmospheric
 SO2, NO2, O3 and hydrocarbons from the incoming air before it is directed towards the
 clean-air grown plants  (controls) or prior to the addition of specific amounts of NOX into the
 air stream diverted towards treatment plants. Unfortunately, activated charcoal is a very
 variable commodity. Different efficiencies of various types of activated charcoal may be
 traced to the original source of wood from which it was made. In an attempt to achieve
 uniformity, the source  of the wood used in manufacture is often specified;  the most usual
 being coconut-shells heated to 600 °C for 1 h before packaging. Nevertheless, the efficiency
 with which each batch  of activated charcoal removes atmospheric contaminants varies, not
just with respect to different atmospheric contaminants but also with age, humidity, degree of
 activation and temperature (American Society for Testing and Materials, 1982).
 Furthermore, charcoal  filters can desorb as well as adsorb— a fact often recorded by monitors
 early in the morning as the filter units start to warm up in the  sun.  Normally,  most if not all
NO2 is removed by fresh activated charcoal but such a filter has no capacity to adsorb NO
 (Commission of the European Communities,  1986;  see also Table 9-1). Studies of NOX
effects must therefore employ an additional stage of air purification to avoid this problem.
Purafil™ (Purafil  Inc., Atlanta, GA), which consists of alumina pellets impregnated with
KMnO4, is commonly used in this additional filtration.  This oxidizes any incoming NO to
NO2 which can then be trapped by activated charcoal.
August 1991
                                    9-6
                                       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
            TABLE 9-1. ADSORPTION CAPACITIES OF ACTIVATED CHARCOAL AT
                   ONE-FIFTH OF THE US OSHA PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE
                                LIMITS (PEL)* SET FOR PEOPLE

Ammonia
Carbon monoxide
Hydrogen chloride
Hydrogen fluoride
Hydrogen sulfide
Nitric oxide
Nitrogen dioxide
Nitrous oxide
Sulfur dioxide
PEL
50
50
5
- 3
20
25
5
54
5
Adsorptive Capacity
(Weight %)**
4 x 10'5
1 x 10'8
1 x 10'8
1 x 10'8
2xHT5
1 x KT8
2 x 10'2
4x'10"4
3 x 10'5
       *As defined by the 29CER 1910 OSHA Standard dated April 22, 1986.
       "*Data provided by Westates Carbon Inc., Los Angeles for activated charcoal types G201, G204, G210 and
        G216 made from coconut-shells.
 1          However, there is an additional complication with O3 fumigations of plants because
 2     inadvertent exposures to NOX may also occur. Electrical discharge ozonizers are frequently
 3     used in O3 fumigations of plants but some investigators have not heeded warnings given
 4     several years ago (Harris et al., 1982) that such ozonizers supplied with ultra-pure air will
 5     also form HNO3 and N2O5.  For example, an air-fed ozonizer producing 8,650 ppm O3 also
 6     forms 57 ppm HNO3 and 94 ppm N2O5.  Production of N265 can be prevented by the use of
 7     pure oxygen instead of air but the formation of HNO3 is not entirely prevented. An
 8     alternative, safer procedure is to use an air-fed ozonizer and bubble the O3-enriched air
 9     through ultra-pure water which is changed regularly.  Recently, Brown and Roberts (1988)
10     have drawn renewed attention to errors of interpretation that may occur if plants are supplied
11     with additional N during  experimental fumigations with O3.  Some studies of forest decline
12     have lead to reports that increased nitrate leaching can occur  when O3 is the sole pollutant
13     (Krauseetal.,  1985;  Skeffmgton and Roberts, 1985a,b;  Krause, 1988). In some of these
14     cases, Purafil™ as well as activated charcoal had been used  to clean the air before it was
       August 1991
9-7
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     enriched with O3, and hence no deposition of nitrate from the air would have been expected.
  2     In experiments that are interpreted in this way, it is very important to have an assurance that
  3     the air is purified to remove all NOX, and also that no NOX entered the fumigation chamber
  4     along with the O3.
  5
  6     9.2.2.2 Chambers
  7          Because NO2 is both toxic and diffusive in nature, laboratory studies of its phytotoxicity
  8     must be conducted in chambers with controlled entry and exit of air.  The most common
  9     chamber now in use for gaseous pollutant studies in general is the continuous stirred tank
 10     reactor (CSTR) (Heck et al., 1978). This chamber design is typified by the use of Teflon®
 11     on all surfaces which come in contact with the pollutant gases (thus minimizing gas uptake by
 12     the system) as well as a fan for vigorous mixing of the chamber air, thus minimizing the leaf
 13     boundary layer and maximizing pollutant uptake by the foliage (Rogers et al., 1977).  The
 14     CSTR is particularly well designed for determination of ab- and adsorption of pollutants on a
 15     per unit area of foliage basis, and has been so used in studies of NO2 phytotoxicity (Elkiey
 16     etal., 1982).  Other chamber designs have been used for exposing plants to NO2;  these
 17     generally differ from  CSTR's in that the chamber walls are usually rigid transparent
 18     (non-Teflon®) material and they may or may not Jiave fans (Heck et al., 1968;  Srivastava
 19     and Ormrod, 1984).
20          There are some limitations to the use of laboratory chambers for estimating field plant
21     response to NO2:  temperature  and humidity in the chamber tend to be very stable over time,
22     unlike those conditions experienced  by plants in the field;  light levels are generally lower in
23     chambers than in the field; and boundary layer resistance is generally much lower in the
24     chambers (due to the mixing fan) than in the field.  These differences may modify both the
25     uptake of pollutants by plants and the ability of plants to detoxify or repair damage,
26     potentially altering the amount of injury expressed by the plant.  Field investigations have
27     been conducted using  open-top  chambers which allow plant exposure under atmospheric
28     conditions  more similar to ambient (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1986).  The
29     disadvantage of field exposure systems  are:  loss of tight control of pollutant concentration
30     around the vegetation; climatic differences among growing seasons confounding replication
31      over time;  and climatic conditions specific to any one year may interact and modify plant
       August 1991
9-8
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     response.  While chamberless methods for exposing plants are in use (Zonal Air Pollution
 2     System [ZAPS], for example), most data from this exposure system describe plant response
 3     to SO2 (Lee and Lewis,  1977;  Muller et al., 1979).
 4                          '  .  :    '       •  •  •                         '
 5     9.2.2.3  Monitoring
 6          The amount of NO2/NOX/NO in air is now most commonly detected by
 7     chemiluminescent analyzers,  which are available from manufacturers such as Monitor Labs
 8     and Thermo-Electron. Regardless of the instrument source, the principle of operation is the
 9     same:  when NO and O3 react' in the gaseous phase, NO2 is produced (NO + O3 -»• NO2 +
10     O2 + hi/).  The NO2 molecules generated by this process are electronically excited, and their
11     decay to a lower energy state results in the emission of light.  The intensity of this emission
12     is linearly proportional to the concentration of NO produced in the reaction.  Prior to the
13     reaction with O3, the NO2 in the air sample must be converted to NO, which is usually
14     accomplished using a catalyst, such as molybdenum, and heat:  3NO2 +  Mo •* 3NO +
15     MoO3.  Since most sources of air to be analyzed contain a mixture of NO and NO2, the
16     determination of NO2 concentration is by necessity a two-step process. First the amount of
17     NO in the air is determined by bypassing the NO -* NO2 converter.  Then the air is passed
18     through the converter to determine NOX, which is the original NO2 plus the NO which has
19     been converted to NO2.  The difference between these two readings determines  NO2:  NO2
20      = NOX - NO.  Most NOX analyzers have a mode selection feature that allows any one of
21     these parameters to be displayed and recorded although both NOX and NO are alternately
22     measured.
23          Calibration of the analyzers is a key to gathering high quality pollutant dose-plant
24     response data.  The principle of calibration requires a gas source of known.concentrations of
25     NO, as well as a source of zero air. The source of NO is usually a pressurized cylinder
26     containing  between 50 and 100 ppm NO in nitrogen and should be traceable to a National
27     Bureau  of Standards NO in N2 Reference Material.  Zero air is defined as air which is free of
28     any contaminants which will cause a detectable response in any mode of  the analyzer (NO,
29     NO2 or NOX) or react with NO,  NO2 or O3 in the gas phase (ThermoElectron Corp., n.d.).
30          Concentration of NOX in an air sample can be determined by its colorimetric reactions
31      (Saltzman, 1954) or by its ability to oxidize a chemical mixture.  This latter process is the
        August 1991
9-9
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
27
28
29
30
 basis of the Mast NO2 Meter (Mast Co., OH, USA): ' the air sample is percolated through a
 chemical mixture, the resulting redox potential of which is measured by a potentiometer.
 However, these chemical means are rarely used today for determination of NO2 since the
 chemiluminescent methods are capable of measuring the various oxides of nitrogen, and do so
 with greater accuracy and sensitivity.

 9.2.3  Pollutant Climatology
     As NO2 is a primary, anthropogenic pollutant, its production is not closely linked to
 meteorological conditions. However, the conversion of NO2 to NO and the consequent
 production of O3  is related to sunlight and air temperature, so that the appearance and
 disappearance of NO2, NO and O3 in an artificial environment are closely linked
 (Figure 9-1).

 9.2.4  Pollutant Chemistry
     Oxides of nitrogen are produced from both natural and anthropogenic processes: forest
 fires and electric storms (NO, NO^, soil processes (NO, N2O) and oceans (N2O) are some
 of the natural sources, whereas combustion of oil and coal (NO, NO2, N2O) and gas (NO,
 NO2) are the main anthropogenic sources (Stern,  1986)1 Once emitted into the atmosphere,
 these compounds undergo transformation as part of the photochemical smog cycle
 (Figure 9-2).  The reactive cycle centers around photolysis of NO2 into NO and O.  The
 oxygen radical (O) is then available to combine with O2 to form O3, and NO is available to
 react either with O3 for the production of NO2 and O2, or with HO2 to form NO9 and OH:
                                NO2 + hi/ •+ NO + O
NO + O -* NO
                                                  O
                             H02 + NO  " N°2 + OH.
This cycle describes the primary relationship among NO2, NO and O3 and is known as the
inorganic nitrogen cycle (Stern, 1986).  These pollutants can then be deposited to sinks by
any of a number of processes— wet or dry deposition in either original or modified form.
The individual processes of the deposition/transformation cycle have been  well described
       August 1991
                                       9-10      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                   0
468
 Irradiation Time  (hours)
      Figure 9-1. Propylene and NO oxidation under artificial illumination.  NO is oxidized
                  to NO2 and other oxides of nitrogen.  Ozone concentrations build up after
                  the ratio of NO2 to NO  increases.
      Source: Stern (1986).
1     (Figure 9-3).  Once the pollutants have been deposited to vegetation or soil, they become
2     available to the biosphere as toxins.
3
4     9.2.5  Terminology
5     9.2.5.1 Plant Response
6     Interaction—effect in which plant exposure to a factor modifies plant response to a second
7     factor;  these factors may be pollutants, edaphic and atmospheric conditions (such as RH,
8     temperature, soil moisture), or intra-plant (such as age, cultivar).  Interaction may be
9     synergistic (plant response to two factors is  greater than sum of response to individual
      August 1991
      9-11
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
          QH+C3H6

      Figure 9-2.  The cyclic interaction of free radicals, hydrocarbons, NO, NO2 and
                   ultraviolet radiation hi photochemical smog.  In this example hydroxyl
                   radical reacts with propylene at the left side of the diagram forming RO2.
                   This cycle interacts with NO and molecular O2. The inorganic NOX-O3
                   cycle is shown on the right side of the diagram with photolysis of NO2
                   eventually forming O3.
      Source: Stern (1986).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
factors), antagonistic (plant response is less than sum of response to individual factors), or
additive (equal to the plant response to individual factors); in addition, the term coalitive is
sometimes used to describe plant response to a mixture in the absence of any response to
either of the factors alone—in contrast to synergism, where both factors  must have an effect
on their own.

Damage—plant response to pollutants resulting in loss of intended use or role,  for example,
agricultural yield, landscaping aesthetics, wildlife habitat.
      August 1991
                                        9-12
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                         to)
                         10  ,-
                         S  I
                       -  m  •"
                        II
*•-
f
L
c
_o
S
§.
1


r
Evaporallon, Desorptlon




'1

i
2[ P
Co
I
Cor
/
Pollutant
in
Clear Air
Evaporation
Separation
-^
o
to
c*g
ollutant and
idensed Water
ntermixed in
nmon Airspace
tog
||
U)£3
Attachment
iJ Pollutant Attached
to Condensed-
Water Elements
J
Reaction
-«
Reaction
4J Attached
Pollutant Modified
by Aqueous-Phasa
Physicochemical Reactions
1
c
"m
0
II
.§J Pollutant Deposited
on
Earth's Surface


O
I Wet Oepoa



                                                           ll
Figure 9-3.  Phase interaction diagram for pollutant scavenging processes.  Initially, the
            pollutant may be in the gas phase (Box 1).  The presence of water vapor in
            the atmosphere provides for the intermixing of gaseous pollutants with
            aqueous droplets in the same space (i.e., in a cloud [Box 2]). The pollutant
            gases can become attached to the water droplets (i.e., be absorbed [Box 3]),
            and undergo chemical reaction (Box 4). The gaseous and aqueous
            pollutants return to the earth's surface (Box 5). Some of these processes
            have reversible pathways, and others are unidirectional.

Source:  National Academy of Sciences (1983), in Stern (1986).
August 1991
9-13
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 Injury—measurable change in plant structure or function at either the organ, cellular or
 molecular level, which may or may not lead to damage.

 Exposure-response relationships—the generalization of data describing plant response to
 pollutant exposure by the fitting  of a mathematical model, which is generally used for
 predictive purposes, as it interpolates plant response to pollutant doses for which data have
 not been gathered.

 9.2.5.2 Pollutant Exposure
 Concentration—the amount of pollutant in the air expressed either on a ,v/v (ppm, /iL/L) or
          o
 w/v (Mg/nr) basis;  the v/v basis is usually preferred, as it remains constant over air
 temperature, whereas #g/m3 varies with air temperature.

Duration—the length of time during which the plant is exposed to pollutant treatments; in
 practical terms is usually measured in h/day for episodic exposures or in days/week or
 days/growing season for  chronic exposure.

Dose—the product of concentration and duration, the units of which are ppm/h or ppm/day;
 for a static exposure (constant  concentration for the entire duration) the simple mathematic
product is used,  whereas  for variable or dynamic exposures, the integral of pollutant
 concentration over time is used.

 Co-occurrence—pollutant episode during which plants are exposed to two or more gases at
the same time.

Sequential—pollutant episode during which two or more gases are presented to the plants one
at a time with neither pollutant making  more than one appearance.

 Complex-sequential—episode, during which two or more gases are presented to the plants one
at a time, with one or more of I the pollutants making more than one appearance.
       August 1991
                                         9-14
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 Chronic exposure—descriptive term for pollutant exposure at a lower concentration for a
 longer duration;  exposures of this type are usually sub-injurious excep't in very sensitive
 species or cultivars.

Acute exposure—descriptive term for pollutant exposure at a higher concentration for a
 shorter duration; exposures of this type usually cause visible injury symptoms in species with
 a broad range of sensitivities.
Ambient exposure—descriptive term for pollutant exposure which is similar to that which
plants would experience when growing in their intended setting;  usually implies that
pollutant.concentration is "dynamic", that is, changes during the exposure period occur in a
pattern which simulates the ambient atmosphere.

Episodic exposure—descriptive term  for pollutant exposure during which the peak gas
concentration approximates the maxima seen in intermittent ambient exposures.

Absorption—removal of gaseous pollutant from the air into the interior of the leaf through the
stomates (greatest absorption) or cuticle (least absorption); can be greatly modified by any
environmental parameter which influences stomatal opening.

Adsorption—removal of gaseous pollutant from the air by vegetation which is not attributable
to stomatal or cuticular absorption;  usually  involves attachment to and/or modification  by
such organs as cuticle, trichomes or bark; relatively insensitive to environmental parameters;
tends to be related more to species and plant age.

Flux—removal of gaseous pollutant from the air to surfaces (such as vegetation, chambers or
buildings);  usually described in  terms of weight per area per unit time.

Deposition—synonym for flux;  deposition may be wet (pollutant dissolved in rain or fog) or
dry (in the absence of precipitation).
       August 1991
                                          9-15
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      9.3  MODE OF ACTION
 2      9.3.1  Gas Uptake
 3      9.3.1.1 External NOX Ratios around Leaves
 4           In order to understand the uptake of oxides of nitrogen (NOX) by plants, several
 5      considerations have to be taken into account.  First, the composition of the atmosphere
 6      around leaves with respect to all pollutants (not just NOX) has to be determined regularly (at
 7      least every 5 mm).  Second, all routes of entry of NOX into a plant have to be defined and
 8      assessed.  Even now it is not certain that all possible routes of access are known; especially
 9      those which may involve non-aqueous processes prior to entry into cells (see Section
10      9.4.1.5).  Finally, controlled exposures with NOX should be done in such a way that
11      inadvertent confusions with the effects of other pollutants such as O3 are eliminated, and that
12      the exact form of the N-containing gaseous pollutants (i.e., NO2 or NO,  or the ratio of the
13      two) as well as their concentrations are defined (see Section 9.2.2.2).
14           During combustion, the primary oxide of nitrogen produced is nitrogen  monoxide or
15      nitric oxide (NO, Figure 9-4),  only a little of which conies from N in the fuel. The majority
16      of the NO is generated from the direct combination of atmospheric O and N within flames
17      (Palmer and Seery, 1973).  All ignition reactions  involve or produce free radicals (i.e.,
18      chemicals which are capable of independent existence which  have one or more unpaired
19      electrons in their outer electronic orbitals) such as atomic O and N.  NO is also a free radical
20      (.N=O) which, like others, will react so as to lose or gain an electron.
21           Oxidation of NO by ozone occurs rapidly (k= 1X107 M"1 s"1) even at very low
22      concentrations (Willix, 1976).  Altshuller (1956) has calculated that a 50% conversion of NO
23      by 0.1 ppm O3 would take less than one minute at an NO concentration of 0.1 ppm.
24      Consequently, this reaction is regarded as the most important mechanism forming  NO2 in the
25      atmosphere.  Other pollutants such as hydrocarbons and SO2 can also react with NOX but the
26      importance of these reactions is dependent upon the environmental conditions (Demerjian
27      etal., 1974; Willix, 1976).
28           Concentrations of NO2 in the atmosphere are due to a balance between two sets of
29      reactions—those which form the pollutant (already described) and those which cause its
30      breakdown. Production of NO and atomic oxygen from NO2 is the major reverse reaction
31      (Holmes and Daniels, 1934; Ford and Endow, 1957) which is catalyzed by wavelengths of
       August 1991
9-16
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
       GAS PHASE
         N
               2O'   light
 combustion       ifc    J
.      •». 2ND  "Vy »  2NO
               I     \
              2O     2O
                3       2
                 I
             NOfrHJO)
      AQUEOUS PHASE
            f
           HMO.
  f
HNOL
                                      O'
                               N0
                         NO;
                                                               light
Figure 9-4.  Important interconversions of the different forms of NOX after combustion
           in the atmosphere and in aqueous solutions in contact with atmospheres
           containing NOX.
Source: Rowland et al. (1985).
August 1991
                 9-17     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 light less than 440 nm.  As a consequence of these forward and back reactions, a wide range
 of atmospheric NO-to-NO2 ratios around plants are possible (Fowler and Cape, 1982),
 depending on levels of light and O3.
     Because the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere limits rates of photosynthesis,
 enrichment of atmospheres with CO2 (to 1,000 ppm) is a frequent practice in the greenhouse
 industry (Hand, 1982) but effects of NOX pollution on horticultural crops grown in
 CO2-enriched atmospheres have been observed.  For example, Capron and Mansfield (1975),
 Ashenden et al. (1977), and Law and Mansfield (1982) detected large amounts of NO (up to
 0.45 ppm) in greenhouses equipped with hydrocarbon burners to provide heat and/or CO2 to
 crops.   Although the ratio of NO to NO2 can vary with burner design and method of heating,
 this  ratio is much higher inside (4 parts NO to 1 of NO2) than outside greenhouses.  There
 are two explanations for this observation even though the glass cut-off effect prevents the
 light-induced back conversion of NO2 to NO. First, because the pollutants are monitored
 close to their source, little time is available for oxidation of NO to NO2 and, second, the air
 inside modern greenhouses contains little O3  from outside because the ventilation rates are
 often below one air change per hour (Hurd and Sheard, 1981).

 9.3.1.2  Solution Properties of NOX
     Use of 15NO2 has established that plants can remove NOX from the air (see
 Section 9.3.1.4). However, for a gaseous pollutant to enter an internal mesophyll cell,
 Mansfield and Freer-Smith (1981) point out that the molecules must  pass through  the
 extracellular water covering the plant cell.  Consequently, solubility  of a gas in an aqueous
 medium is an important factor  in determining the rate at which it is taken up.  Both the
 gaseous forms of NO and NO2 are only slightly soluble in pure water but the presence of
 contaminants  such as substituted phenols can alter apparent solubilities (Nash, 1970).
    NO2 differs markedly from NO because it reacts  with water and this feature increases
 significantly the apparent solubility of NO2 relative to NO. Reaction of NO2 with water is
not just a simple hydration producing nitric acid (HNO3). Based on  results from conductivity
experiments, Lee and Schwartz (1981) concluded that NO2 undergoes a comparatively slow
heterogeneous reaction with water to form a dissolved NO2 species which then reacts with
itself to give both HNO3 and nitrous acid (HNO2, see Figure 9-4).  The extent and relative
       August 1991
                                        9-18
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     importance of this dissolution has been questioned (Dasgupta, 1982) but, over pH ranges that
 2     are biologically important., any HNO3 (pKa -1.4) that forms will completely ionize to nitrate.
 3     Similarly, HNO2 will form nitrite but the equilibrium governing this ionization has a pKa of
 4     3.3 which means some undissociated HNO2 will exist below pH 6 especially near cell walls
 5     where pH values as low as pH 4 can occur.
 6          While the solubility of NO in water has been measured (47.1 ml of gas/L of water at
 7     20 °C and 1 atmosphere), the chemical form of the gas in solution is less certain.  Some
 8     studies have suggested that NO reacts with water to form a compound similar to
 9     hydroxylamic  acid (Beattie,  1967) but the gas is now considered to be relatively unreactive
10     with water (Bonner,  1970).  However, isotopic exchange between gaseous 15NO and
11     solutions of N18O2" has been detected (Bonner arid Jordan, 1973; Jordan and' Bonner,  1973).
12     In the case of extracellular water in a plant, this would suggest that NO may form both
13     nitrate and nitrite ions, just like NO2 (see Figure 9-4), but at much slower rates.
14          Solubility of NO in aqueous media varies with temperature and like many other gases is
15     more soluble at lower temperatures than at higher temperatures. Stephen and Stephen (1963)
16     found, for example,  73.8 ml/L of NO was taken up at 0 °C  as compared to 40 ml/L at
17     30 °C. This reduction in solubility of NO as temperature rises has implications for plants
18     growing at low temperatures, especially as rates of conversion of NO to NO2 are reduced at
19     lower temperatures.  As a result, more NO as a proportion of total NOX may persist in colder
20     atmospheres and more NO may dissolve in aqueous layers in contact with this colder air.
21          The chemistry of the two acids produced by NO and NO2 is markedly different.  As
22     already stated, HNO3 is a strong acid while HNO2 is regarded as much weaker (pKa 3.3).
23     Over the probable pH range (5.5-7) of extracellular water (White et al., 1981; Hartung et al.,
24     1988), HNO3  ionizes fully to form both nitrate ions and protons (see Fig. 9-4).  By contrast,
25     HNO2 will be present mainly as nitrite ions and protons  along with very small amounts of
26     undissociated acid.  Consequently, for the plant to metabolize the products of the two gases
27     NO2 and NO it must mainly deal with nitrate,  nitrite, and protons—all of which can pass
28 ;    through cell membranes (Schloemer and Garrett, 1974; Heber and Purczeld, 1978; Gutknecht
29     and Walter, 1981) but only two of which (nitrate and protons) are normally  present in
30     . appreciable quantities inside cells.                                           •
        August 1991
9-19
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
27
28
29
30
31
     Atmospheric NO2 also exists in equilibrium with its dimer N2O4 which could complicate
 the gas-liquid transfers still further.  Fortunately,  at low ambient concentrations, this
 equilibrium is very much in favor of NO2 (Altshuller, 1956; Lee and Schwartz, 1981).
 A similar preference exists for NO and NO2 rather than another higher oxide, N2O5, which
 is produced, for example, by some O3 generators using air (see Section 9.2.2.1).

 9.3.1.3  Foliar Uptake of Nitrate
      Wet and dry deposition of NOX are important processes in the redistribution of nitrogen
 (N) throughout the environment (Varhelyi,  1980) and the processes involved in the deposition
 of various forms of NOX onto plants are covered elsewhere (Section 9.4). However, little
 information exists to confirm or refute the possibility that nitrate (or ammonium) in water
 droplets on the outside cuticles of leaves or needles may gain access to the internal cells
 without falling off, entering the soil and being taken up by the roots. Foliar feeding of
 nodulated legumes with 15NO3" produced a similar distribution of 15N (Oghogharie and Pate,
 1972) to that found in experiments using  15NO2 (see Section 9.3.1.4). but it  required 14 days
 for 60% of the labeled nitrate to be imported into the mesophyll from the leaf surface.
 Afterwards, the majority of 15N was detected in an ethanol-insoluble fraction which indicates
 that the nitrate had been reduced to ammonia, incorporated into amino acids and subsequently
 into proteins.  Unfortunately, the  site of reduction in these studies was not determined.  Later
 experimentation using 15NO3' in different acid rain treatments (pH 4.0, 3.4, 2.7) of
 Phaseolus vulgaris L. (cv. University of Idaho) showed that the amount of N absorbed  by
 foliage decreased as the rainfall pH was reduced (Evans et al.,  1986).  Amounts of N
 accumulated directly from the rain droplets on the leaves into the leaves was found to be only
 a small percentage of that present  in simulated rain and insignificant compared with the
 amounts of N already present in the leaves.  Ammonium and nitrate labeled  with 15N have
 also been used to estimate the amount of foliar uptake of N by red spruce (Picea rubens
 Sarg.) from simulated cloudwater  applied over a period of 50 h (Bowden et al., 19.89).
 Accumulation rates of 15N were found to  be very low. Less than 1.5% of the N required for
 new growth was found to come from ammonium and nitrate in  the cloudwater.  These
 conclusions agree with those obtained by Wolfenden and  Wellburn (1986) using high
performance ion chromatographic  (HPIC) analyses of non-aqueously prepared chloroplasts
       August 1991
                                         9-20      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
from barley given different acid rain treatments (pH 5.6, 4.0, 3.0).  Sulfate in dried-down
rain droplets on leaf surfaces significantly increases the levels of sulfate inside chloroplasts
but nitrate in the same droplets had no corresponding effect.
     Response of plant cells to acidity provided by gaseous pollutants such as NOX has been
described elsewhere (Nieboer et al., 1984) but there is one important effect of nitrate upon
the tonoplast membrane which is relevant to detrimental effects of both wet and dry
N deposition on plants.  Both cell and tonoplast membranes contain energy(ATP)-dependent
H+-pumps, and the tonoplast pump is strongly inhibited by nitrate (Eager and Bilber, 1984).
Consequently, plants that deposit extra protons in their vacuoles when they experience
additional acidity and nitrate at the same time will have extra difficulty in maintaining cellular
control.

9.3.1.4 Evidence of N Uptake Using 15N-labeled Gases
     Fumigation experiments using 15NO2 have demonstrated that plants take up this gas,
that it is converted to nitrite and nitrate,  and that only natural modes of N metabolism are
involved (Rogers et al., 1979; Yoneyama and Sasakawa, 1979; Kaji et al., 1980).  Soon after
fumigation, most of the 15N is in soluble form but as time passes more becomes insoluble
(Yoneyama et al.,  1980a).  Kaji et al. (1980) showed that, after only 20 min exposure,
glutamine and alanine were strongly labeled while Yoneyama and Sasakawa (1979) and
Okano et al. (1984) showed the bulk of the label passed to glutamate and asparagine as well.
About 5 %  of the 15N label that enters a  leaf then moves on to other leaves or to the roots
(Rogers etal., 1979).
    * In the past, 15N2 dilution has been a successful technique to estimate the amount of
N fixation by leguminous crops (Fried and Middelboe, 1977) and the same methodology has
been adapted to measure  the contribution of 15NO2 to total N metabolism within a plant
(Okano et al.,  1986). Testing eight herbaceous plants (sunflower, Helianthus annuus L.;
radish, Raphanus sativus L.; tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill; tobacco,  Nicotiana
tabacum L.; cucumber, Cucumis sativus L.;  kidney bean, Phaseolus vulgaris  L.; maize,  Zea
mays L. and sorghum, Sorghum vulgare L.)  with this method, Okano et al. (1988) showed
that sunflowers exposed to NO2 (0.5 ppm for 14 d) show absorption rates of 0.57 mg
N dm"2 d"1—four times those of Sorghum (0.16 mg N dm"2 d"1). Other species have
        August 1991
                                         9-21
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     intermediate values in the order shown in Table 9-2.  They suggested that the total amount of
 2     NO2-derived N depended primarily upon the unit area presented by different plant species
 3     and that this may explain the larger reductions in growth of sunflower and radish (both
 4     C3 plants) to NO2 and the relative tolerance of sorghum and maize (both C4 plants).  Their
 5     measurements of stomatal conductances also showed high values for sunflower and low rates
 6     for sorghum (see Table 9-2) which would seemingly also account  for these differences.
 7     When regression analysis is applied to the rates of NO2 uptake and stomatal conductances,  a :
 8     linear relationship (r=0.984) is obtained which does not pass through the origin. From this,
 9     Okano et al (1988) concluded that a portion of the NO2 does not enter the leaf through the
10     stomata.
11
         TABLE 9-2. RATES OF NO2 ABSORBED AND STOMATAL CONDUCTANCES
                                  IN 8 HERBACEOUS SPECIES
Species
Sunflower
Radish
Tomato
Tobacco
Cucumber
Kidney bean
Maize
Sorghum
Rate (mg N dm'2 d'1)
0.57
0.44
0.35
0.33
0.27
0.24
0.21
0.16
Conductance (cm s"1)
2.07
1.69
0.91
0.85
0.72
0.58
0.16
0.20
       Source:  Okano et al. (1988).
 1     9.3.1.5  Access of NOX into Leaves
 2          Both deposition velocities of atmospheric N-containing compounds and stomatal
 3     conductances of plants exposed to NOX show large variation (see also Section 9.9) but one
 4     feature of such measurements relating to NO and NO2 is quite clear.  Stomata have to be
 5     open for major uptake of these atmospheric pollutants to occur. Gaseous uptake of NO2 is
       August 1991
9-22
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      much reduced when stomata are closed (Saxe, 1986b; Hanson et al., 1989) or when conifers
 2      are dormant (Skarby etal., 1981; Johansson, 1987).
 3           NOX deposited on leaf and stem surfaces either dissociates and is absorbed in the water
 4      film covering plant cells or it may react with cuticular wax components in a non-aqueous
 5      manner.  In excess, NO2 leads to damaged cuticular surfaces (Fowler et al., 1980).  In these
 6      circumstances, a small amount of NOX enters leaves by penetrating the damaged cuticle.
 7           Until now, the main avenue of entry of NOX has always been thought to be wholly
 8      through the stomata (see Figure 9-5) in a similar manner to that of CO2.  However,  Lendzian
 9      and Kerstiens (1988) suggest that not only is the cuticle a very large reservoir with respect to
10      adsorbed NO2 (to the extent of increasing its own weight by up to 20%), but that the two
11      gases NO and NO2 may cross isolated  cuticles more (two- to six-fold) readily than other air
12      pollutants like SO2 and HF. This is especially the case with cuticles isolated from conifers or
13      citrus trees. They have also shown that specific sites for NO2 exist in plant cuticles and that
14     irreversible binding takes place so that cuticles become completely  "nitrated" during their
15     lifetime.  Only after total  N saturation  has been achieved does the water permanence increase
16     two- to five-fold, although the barrier towards other gases is unaffected. Uptake of NO2 and
                                                                        1 ^         1 ^
17     NO into cuticles has also been demonstrated by labeling studies using i3NO2 and   NO
18     (Kisser-Priesack et al., 1987).  Despite this, it is still difficult to evaluate from these studies
19     using isolated cuticles how much or to what extent NOX can cross undetached cuticles and
20     gain access to epidermal cells.  Calculations, based on results obtained from Abies cuticles
21     exposed to 0.052 ppm NO2, show that the flux through the cuticle would be of the order of
22     2 {j.g h"1 m"2, a rate of deposition one  to two orders of magnitude less than stomatal
23     deposition at similar concentrations of NO2.
24           Stomatal behavior, frequency and distribution are important factors in determining the
25     amount of air pollutants entering a plant (Pande, 1985).  As already mentioned, closed
26      stomata are not a complete barrier to NOX since a proportion penetrates the cuticle.
27      Nevertheless, the consistent trend from all gas exchange studies (Darrall, 1989) is that there
28      is less response of a plant to NOX under conditions which cause stomatal closure. These
29      include stresses such as low light, humidity or N status (Srivastava et al.,  1975a; Law and
 30      Mansfield, 1982; Kaji et  al., 1980; Yoneyama et al., 1980c).  Atmospheric NOX can also
        August 1991
9-23
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
         HNO
NO or NCL    Atmosphere
                                              Boundary layer
          A&KX xgfcj xy w
           ^ F^» -». *. H Mr «V*- — +Z\

            '   -    "   *
                                                  /  Epidermis
                                         Substomafaf space
                                            *3i             tl
                                         Extracellular fluid
                                          ,:#^^.
      MesoprfyTl
              :#r       -^^
          jgejlulose eelllwall



          Plasmavmerribrane
                  x^f
                     i\
          :Chloroplast
Figure 9-5. Likely access routes for NOX into a plant leaf. The layer of still air or

          boundary layer imposes a resistance, Ra, which depend on a number of

          factors including wind speed. Access is then limited by the degree of

          stomatal opening, Rs, or to a much lesser extent by penetration through the

          cuticle of epidermal layers, Rc. The mesophyll resistance, Rm, consists of a

          number of different components before the major sites of reaction are

          encountered.
Source: Wellbum (1988).



August 1991
     9-24
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     cause direct reductions in stomatal conductance (Carlson, 1983) which are then reflected in
 2     decreases in transpiration and photosynthesis (see Section 9.4.3.2).
 3          In conclusion, stomatal aperture plays the major role in determining the extent of the
 4     effects of NOX on plants by limiting access to intercellular air spaces.
 5
 6     9.3.1.6  Access of the Products of NOX into Cells
 7          Zeevaart (1976) was the first to suggest that any NO2 entering a leaf dissolves in the
 8     extracellular water of the sub-stomatal cavity to form both HNO2 and HNO3 which then
 9     dissociate to form nitrate, nitrite, and protons (see Figure 9-4 and Section 9.3.1.2).  Large
10     air spaces exist in a leaf which amount to 50-80% air by volume (Nobel, 1974) and from this
11     it follows that the inner leaf cells provide a large surface area for the absorption of NOX.
12     Solubilities of NO and NO2 in the extracellular water are affected by pH and the presence of
13     other substances which may determine, in part,  the rates of uptake of NOX (Soderlund,
14     1981).  Anderson and Mansfield (1979), for example, found that NO was more soluble in
15     xylem sap than in distilled water presumably because of much higher ionic strengths.  Since
16     xylem sap is continuous  with the extracellular water in a leaf, an enhanced solubility of NO
17     in the latter may be expected over that predicted by  the water solubility figures alone (see
18     Section 9.3.1.2).
19          Mesophyll resistance is a collective term which describes all those parameters involved
20     in gaseous uptake between the stomata and the final site of reaction of an incoming gas.  It
21     includes components such as solubility, dissolution, penetration of the cell wall or
22     membranes, and the intervening cellular metabolism. The ability of this resistance (see
23     Figure 9-5) to regulate pollutant uptake has received little attention partly because the factors
24     involved in mesophyll resistance are difficult to measure (Capron and Mansfield, 1977).  By
25     deduction, Srivastava et  al. (1975a,b)  implicated mesophyll resistance to the flux of NO2 into
26     Phaseolus vulgaris as being responsible for increased leaf tolerance to this pollutant gas with
27     time.  This possibility also  may account for differences in tolerance shown by different sweet
28     pepper and tomato cultivars exposed to NO or NO2 (Murray and Wellburn, 1985; see
29     Sections 9.3.2.1-2).                                             •
30           Cellular biochemical mechanisms are components  of the mesophyll resistance (see
31     Section 9.3.2).  The effectiveness of plant metabolism to assimilate or transform the products
        August 1991
9-25
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 of NOX in aqueous solution (see Section 9.3.3) may alter the uptake of NOX.  Bennett et al.
 (1975), for example, found that NOX was absorbed most efficiently by foliage near the top of
 plant canopies where both light intensities and metabolic rates are highest.

 9.3.1.7  Levels of the Products of NOX in Cells
      Nitrite is a normal intermediate in  the sequential reduction of nitrite to ammonia prior to
 synthesis of amino acids within plants (see Figure 9-6).  Relative contributions of root and
 shoot tissue to the assimilation of nitrate, and its subsequent reduction, differ widely between
 species as well as being dependent upon the nitrate concentration around the roots (Kato
 et al., 1974; Lee and Stewart, 1978).  Even nitrate metabolism by ecotypes and cultivars of
 the same species may vary (Rajagopal et al., 1976;  Harris arid Whittington, 1983).  Use of
 15NO2 has also shown  that, once inside a plant, 15N can be transferred to all parts of the
 plant except mature leaves (Yoneyama et al., 1980a; Okano et al., 1984).  This process is
 extremely rapid. For example, radioactive label from atmospheric 13NO2 (half-life 10 min)
 surrounding single barley-leaves was detected in all the remaining parts of the seedlings,
 including the roots, within minutes (Rowland, 1985) although the vast bulk of the label
 remained in the exposed leaves.                   ,
      In general, when  bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Kinghorn Wax) are exposed to
 ambient levels of NOX  (0.02 ppm NO2 for 5 days), nitrite levels rarely rise (Srivastava and
 Ormrod, 1984, 1986).  However, Zeevaart (1976) did report a large increase of nitrite rather
 than nitrate when peas  were exposed to exceptionally high levels of NO2 (8.4 ppm) for 1-2 h.
 Similarly, when Yu et al. (1988) fumigated both spinach (Spinacia oleracea L. cv. New
 Asia) and kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Shin Endogawa) in the dark,  elevated
levels of nitrite only occurred with high levels of NO2 (3.5 ppm).  Even at levels of 8 ppm
NO2 in the light, only spinach showed accumulations of nitrite but both species had very
large accumulations of  ammonia. At much lower levels of NO2 (0.25 ppm), Spierings
 (1971) detected a slight decrease hi the nitrate content of tomato (cv. Moneymaker) leaves
after exposure to NO2 for four months but could detect no nitrite in the juice from
compressed fresh tissues.  Likewise, Taylor and Eaton (1966) reported a slight decrease
 (1.8 meq N g"1 fresh wt) in nitrate content from leaves of tomato after 19 days of exposure
to NO2 (0.42-0.54 ppm).
       August 1991
                                         9-26
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
       GOGAT
                           CONH2  Glutamine
                                          ADP
                                                 ATP
                                               CH22
                                              HCNH2
                                               COO"
                                         Glutamate
               Kreb's citric acid cycle
Figure 9-6.  Uptake and metabolic pathways involved in the uptake of NOX into plant
         leaf tissue from the atmosphere.  The enzymes involved include nitrate
         reductase (NaR), nitrite reductase (NiR), glutamine synthetase (GS),
         glutamate synthase (GOGAT) and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH).

Source: Wellburn (1988).                                     .    ,    ,
August 1991
9-27
DRAFT-DO NOT; QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1          Recent work has shown that changes in levels of total nitrate in response to NO2 depend
  2     upon the amounts of N supplied as nitrate to the roots of plants at the time of exposure
  3     (Srivastava and Ormrod, 1984, 1986, 1989; Okano and Totsuka,  1986; Rowland et al., 1987;
  4     Rowland and Drew, 1988).  Hydroponically-grown barley (0.1 mM nitrate) accumulate 85%
  5     more nitrate than controls when exposed to 0.3 ppm NO2 for 9 days but similarly polluted
  6     seedlings grown with 10 mM nitrate have even,25% less nitrate than controls (Rowland
  7     et al., 1987).  This difference in nitrate content was not significant in bean (Phaseolus
  8     vtdgaris L. cv. Kinghorn Wax) shoots exposed to 0,5 ppm NO2 for 14 days (6 h/day) when
  9     grown with high levels of nitrate (20 mM) but levels of nitrate in the roots of the same plants
 10     were very different (Srivastava and Ormrod, 1986). Those grown in clean air had only 40%
 11     of the root nitrate found in polluted plants.
 12          By contrast, concentrations of total N (as opposed to nitrate content)  within plant shoots
 13     sometimes decline following exposure to NOX.  EMey and Ormrod (1981d), for example,
 14     found a significant decrease in the total N content of three cultivars of Petunia exposed
 15     intermittently to 0.8 ppm NO2 over four days while similar decreases in shoot total N were
 16     found in Phaseolus vulgaris L.  (cv.  Kinghorn Wax) and spybean (Glydne  max Merr. cv.
 17     Williams) with increasing NO2 concentrations (Srivastava and Ormrod, 1986; Sabaratnam
 18     et al., 1988a). The reasons why shoot N levels may decline after exposure to NOX remain
 19     unclear but translocation of additional N from shoots to roots appears to offer a partial
20     explanation. This reallocation of NO2-derived N to the roots was shown to be highly
21     significant using barley (Hprdeum vulgare L. cv. Patty) grown  hydroponically at both
22     medium (1 mM) and low (0.01 mM) levels of unlabeled nitrate and exposed to 14NO2
23     (0.5 ppm) for 8 days, followed by 15NO2 (0.5 ppm) for 3 h and then back to unlabeled NO2
24     for one more day (Rowland et al., 1987).
25          Levels of total N do not always decline. Sinn and Pell (1984) reported that when potato
26     plants were exposed to 0.2  ppm NO2 for 5 h twice weekly throughout the  life cycle of the
27     plant, total N did increase significantly.  Similarly, Troiano and Leone (1977) reported that
28     when they exposed tomato plants to 0.025 ppm NO2 for 80-164 h the N content went in
29     foliage particularly when plants were grown with optimum levels of N in hydroponic culture.
30          Nitrate and nitrite concentrations in isolated chloroplasts from barley  (cv. Patty)
31      exposed to atmospheric NO2 (0.28 ppm for 1-3 days) have been measured  using high
       August 1991
9-28 ,     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      performance ion chromatpgraphy (Wellburn, 1985).  Concentrations of nitrate decline
 2      significantly to a low point on the second day of fumigation before rising back to control
 3      levels. Levels of nitrite show the converse, rising to a maximum on the second day before
 4      falling back.  These changes may be explained by imbalances in the relative speeds of
 5      induction of the  two enzymes, nitrate and nitrite reductases (see Sections 9.3.2.1, 2).  The
 6      first enzyme is induced faster than the second so initially more nitrate is converted to nitrite
 7      and, when the second catches up, nitrite declines again.
 8                                .•-•-"•••••
 9      9.3.1.8  Cycling, Partitioning amf Elimination of NO2-derived N
10           As Section 9.3.1.4 has already mentioned, uptake studies with 15NO2 have shown
11      incorporation of label in leaves.into glutamine,  asparagine, glutamate and alanine.  While
12     several groups have also demonstrated transfer of this label into roots,  Okano et al. (1984)
13     showed that this relocation was biphasic—an initial afflux of soluble metabolites, from the
14     leaves followed  by  a slower redistribution as label move,d out of the leaf protein fraction.
15     Closer examination of the 15N label in the various components of both roots and shoots of
16     snapbeans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Blue Bush Lake 290) after just 3 h of exposure also
17     reveals differences,(Rogers et al.,  1979).  In the leaves, 63% of the label was found to be
18     associated with the protein/nucleic acid fraction, 33% with the amino acid/amide fraction and
19     very little with nitrate (5%).   In roots, however, the balance between the first two fractions
20     was approximately  equal (47% and 41%,  respectively).  .
21           Using 15NO3", Rowland et al. (1987) have shown that nitrate uptake by roots is
22     unaffected by exposure of barley (cy. Patty) leaves  to atmospheric NO2 (0.3 ppm for 9 days)
23     but such a fumigation does affect the ability of the roots to  resppnd to changes in root nitrate
24      supply.  The allocation of label from 15NO3' remaining in the roots was found to be reduced
25   ,  by fumigation with NO2 especially in those barley seedlings grown at low levels of N supply.
26      A pronounced effect of atmospheric NO2 was also found in the xylem of similar plants
27      growing on low levels of nitrate in the form of raised amounts of serine, asparagine and
28      glutamine. In barley seedings well supplied with nitrate, the main  effect of atmospheric NO2
29      is to increase the amount of reduced N in the roots (Rowland et al., 1987).  This was thought
 30      to be due to a decrease in -the transport of organic N from the roots to  the shoots in the xylem
 31      stream.                              ,
        August 1991
9^29      DRAFT-DQ NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
      Consequently, the responses of plants to atmospheric NO2 are very different if the N
 supply is either limiting or adequate (see also Section 9.3.1.7). If there is sufficient N, there
 is less redistribution of N and less influence upon roots of N derived from NO2 taken in by
 the leaves.
      Law and Mansfield (1982) calculated that the input of N as NO from a 66 kW kerosene
 burner into a greenhouse with a floor area of 0.05 ha may amount to over 100 kg ha"1 in a
 growing season of 100 days. Theoretically, such a burner could fulfil virtually all the N
 requirement of a tomato crop.  In practice,  greenhouse crops seem to have a limited capacity
 to utilize N from NO since a supply of NO cannot compensate for the reduction in yield due
 to a deficiency of soil N (Mansfield and Murray,  1984). This is not true in the case of foliar
 uptake of NO2.  FaUer (1972), for example, fumigated N-deficient sunflowers (Helianthus
 annuiis) with NO2 (0.8-3.1 ppm for 21 days) and found a reduction in the symptoms of N
 deficiency, 6-28% more growth in the primary leaves but not in the roots, and increases of
 between 70-116% leaf N and 19-70% root N.
      Once pollutant-derived N has been reduced,  the form in which it is stored varies (see
 Section 9.3.1.4).  Most, if not all, the common protein amino acids can accumulate 15N
 derived from 15NO2 (Durmishidze and Nutsubidze, 1976; Yoneyama et al. 1980d).
 However, the extent of 15N  accumulation is not only species  but also time dependent.  As
 rates of processes involved in uptake and utilization of N vary over 24 h, it is not surprising
 to find that effects of  NOX also differ over the same period.  In spinach and sunflower,
 exposure to 15NO2 during  the night causes enrichments in 15N of different amino acids
 compared to those labeled  during conventional daytime fumigations (Yoneyama et al.,
 1980d), but the mechanism by which .this occurs is unknown.
     Time-course studies have also shown that the content of glutamine in the first trifoliate
 leaf oiPhaseolus vulgaris increases rapidly after exposure to 4.0 ppm NO2 (Ito et al., 1984b)
but levels reach a plateau after only 4 h of fumigation.  Since the plants received NO2
throughout the whole of this 8 h experiment, this  suggests that the controls upon the rates of
N metabolism in these plants responded to the pollutant by  establishing a new steady-state
level and that N was passed from glutamine to another  compound for storage. Ito et al.
(1986) have suggested asparagine, ureides, or glutathione as such possibilities.
       August 1991
                                         9-30
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1           So far, all the studies discussed above indicate a participation of the normal pathway of
 2      nitrate reduction followed by synthesis of amino acids and proteins as a means by which
 3      plants detoxify NOX (see Figure 9-6 and Sections 9.3.2).  However, it is possible that other
 4      natural  metabolic processes could detoxify the products of atmospheric NOX. One obvious
 5      pathway is polyamine production.  In the case of uptake of NOX, this possibility appears not
 6      to have been investigated although significant effects of other air pollutants such as SO2 on
 7      polyamine production are known (Priebe et al.,  1978).
 8           Other means of detoxification, such as the release of other N-containing gases,  may also
.9      be important.  Natural emissions of N2, NO and NH3 from plant tissue and canopies have
10      been reported (Vanecko and Varner, 1955; Hill, 1971;  Farquhar et al., 1979) but no
11      fumigation studies using NOX have detected emissions of NH3.  Where an association has
12   ,   been detected between NO2 uptake and NO release, the amount of the latter may amount to
13      70% of the NO2 ab(d)sorbed (Nishimura et al., 1986) and emissions of NO are strongly
14      dependent upon humidity.  Release of NO after treatment of • plant tissue with certain
15      herbicides (Klepper, 1979) or during the in vivo assays of nitrate reductase (Harper,  1981)
16    '  activity are both known to be .associated -with accumulations of nitrite ions and both enzymic
17      (Nelson et al., 1983) or non-enzymic (Klepper, 1979; Nishimura et al., 1986) mechanisms of
18      release  have been proposed.
19
20      9.3.2  Chemical and Biochemical Responses
21      9.3.2.1  Nitrate Reductase Activities
22           Reduction of nitrate and incorporation of reduced  N into a wide range of compounds is
23      found in nearly all higher plants (Runge, 1983). Nitrate reductase (NaR or NAD(P)H :
24      nitrate oxidoreductase, EC 1.6.6.2), which catalyses the reduction of nitrate to nitrite (see
25      Figure  9-6), is substrate-induced and hence its levels of activity are determined by the supply
26      of nitrate (Beevers and Hageman,  1969).  Current evidence favors the concept that
27      the  activity of NaR in  higher plants is regulated by changes in turnover of enzyme
28      involving fresh synthesis and breakdown (Remmler and Campbell, 1986) rather than
29    ..  activation-inactivation  of the original protein.- Increases in nitrate supply cause an increase in
30      the  level of NaR mRNA which correlates with the induction of NaR protein (Cheng  et al.,
31      1986; Crawford et al., 1986).
        August 1991
9-31
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
31
      Because NO2 dissolves in aqueous media such as the extracellular fluid and cytoplasm
 to form both nitrate and nitrite (see Section 9.3.1 above), this gas has often been thought of
 as a potential source of substrate for NaR.  Consequently, effects of NOX on the levels of
 activity of NaR have been much studied. Induction of NaR activities by atmospheric NO2
 was first demonstrated by Zeevaart (1974) in peas (Pimm sativum L., cv. Rondo) grown only
 on an ammonium-based medium so that they were initially devoid of NaR activity.  When
 exposed to very high levels of NO2 (12 ppm) for up to  1 h,  rapid induction of NaR activities
 took place and the first signs of enhanced activity were  observed within 10 min from the start
 of fumigation.  In studies of lack of growth of horticultural crops growing in CO2-enriched
 greenhouses, where levels of atmospheric NOX can be very high (see Section 9.3.1.1),
 Murray and Wellburn (1985) could only find a significant increase in shoot NaR activity in
 one cultivar (Ailsa Craig) of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) but not in another
 (Eurocross BB) or in two pepper varieties (Capsicum annum L. cvs. Bell Boy and Rhumba)
 exposed to 1.5 ppm NO2 for 18 h.  In these cultivars, no change in any of the shoot NaR
 levels occurred with 1.5 ppm NO nor any change in the levels of root NaR activities with
 either gas.
     Srivastava and Ormrod (1984) showed that the large increases in shoot NaR activities in
 Phaseolus vulgaris (cv. Kinghorn Wax) were associated  with increases in root nitrate supply.
 These were accentuated by NO2 fumigation (0.5 ppm for 5 days) but only when the supply of
 N to the roots was low (< 1  mM).  At similar levels of  NO2 (0.3 ppm for 9 days), Rowland
 et al. (1987) found that barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv.  Patty), grown hydroponically with
 both low (0.01  mM) and adequate (0.1 mM) levels  of nitrate in the nutrient solution, also
 showed significant increases in levels of shoot but not root NaR activities. Therefore,
 between and within  species differences,  as well as the availability of nutrients and
 developmental age of the tissues involved, determine if NaR levels of activity are
 significantly affected by atmospheric NO2.
     Rates of entry  of NO2 into leaves, however, depend primarily on stomatal aperture
rather man induced changes in the levels of NaR activity. Using the same hydroponic system
as before, Rowland-Bamford et al. (1989) exposed various barley mutants, known to show
deficiencies in their  ability to induce NaR activities, to NO2 (0.3 ppm for 9 days).  Fluxes of
NO2 into leaves, net water vapor loss and stomatal conductances were very similar in both
       August 1991
                                        9-32
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
wild-type controls and the mutants even though the levels of NaR activities in the latter were
much reduced in both shoots and roots relative to those in the wild type (cv. Steptoe).  Levels
of NaR activity in the shoots of this cultivar (Steptoe) behaved differently than those found in
the barley cultivar (Patty) used in previous studies (Rowland et al., 1987).  When grown on
nitrate and exposed to NO2, levels of shoot NaR activities in the cultivar Steptoe were
reduced (Rowland-Bamford et al., 1989) as well as those in the mutants which already had
low levels of NaR activity. Only when grown on ammonium did Steptoe behave like Patty
(i.e., show enhanced levels of NaR in the presence of NO2) but root levels of NaR activity
were much reduced when either Steptoe or the mutant seedling shoots were exposed to
atmospheric NO2, irrespective of the source of N in the hydroponic medium.
      Induction of NaR may be abolished by fumigation of squash cotyledons with high levels
of N02 (Hisamatsu et al., 1988). This effect has been ascribed to an inhibition caused by the
accumulation of large amounts  of ammonium and certain amino acids known to take place in
 squash cotyledons during NO2  fumigation (Takeuchi et al., 1985).
      Alteration of N supply to the roots  of many non-woody plant species is known to
 change shoot NaR activities (Steer, 1982) but the relative importance of root, as opposed to
 shoot reduction of nitrate, in conifers may differ from that in angiosperms.  Amundson and
 McClean  (1982) have suggested that several woody species may be particularly sensitive to
 injury by NO2 because some species  only reduce nitrate in their roots. However, Wingsle
 et al. (1987) using Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings have shown a significant increase
 (15 to 400 Mmol nitrite  formed g^FW h'1) in shoot NaR activities after 7 days of fumigation
 with 85 ppb N02 but were unable to alter and increase such activities in control seedlings by
 increasing the amount of nitrate supplied to the roots.  Similarly,  Norbyet al. (1989) were
 able to detect a three-fold increase in shoot NaR activities in  1-year-old red spruce (Picea
 rubens Sarg.) exposed to either NO2 (75 ppb)  or HNO3 vapor (75 ppb) for just 1 day.
  Elevated levels of NaR  activity persisted for longer after the HNO3 vapor treatment and older
  seedlings were slower to react but spraying the seedlings with acid mist containing nitrate
  (pH 3.5 and pH 5) had no effect on shoot NaR activities.
         August 1991
                                           9-33
                                                            DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     9.3.2.2 Nitrite Reductase
  2          While nitrate reductase (NaR) is located in the cytosol, probably near the cell or plasma
  3     membrane, nitrite reductase (NiR ; E.G. 1.6.6.4) activities in higher plants are confined to
  4     plastids palling et al., 1972;  Wallsgrove et al., 1979) even in root tissues  (Ernes and
  5     Fowler, 1979). Reduction of nitrite by light to form ammonia in chloroplasts (see
  6     Figure 9-6) is dependent upon six electrons arriving via ferredoxin from the photosynthetic
  7     electron transport chain spanning the thylakoids (see Figure 9-6; Losada et al., 1965; Beevers
  8     and Hageman, 1969, 1980). When levels of extractable NiR and NaR in pea seedlings
  9     subjected to different light, shade, drought and nitrate treatments are followed, activities of
 10     both rise in response to increased nitrate supply (Gupta and  Beevers, 1983).   However, when
 11     plants are exposed to drought or are transferred to darkness, NaR activities decline more
 12     rapidly than those of NiR even though the initial induction by nitrate of NiR is 30-40 times
 13     higher than that of NaR (Ingle et al., 1966; Joy, 1969).  Rao et al.  (1981) have suggested
 14     that the light-dependent component of this NaR induction is mediated by phytochrome and
 15     that induction of NiR by nitrate is an independent process from that of NaR.
 16          This double induction of both NaR and NiR is important when alternative sources of
 17     N such as nitrite or NOX pollution are concerned.  Back  conversion of nitrite to nitrate in  *
 18     plant tissues has been demonstrated (Aslam  et al., 1987)  but induction of NaR does not occur
 19     until nitrate can be detected in the leaves.  Only nitrate can  induce NaR but definitive studies
20     to prove that nitrate alone may induce NiR activities have not been done.  NO produces both
21     nitrite and nitrate ions in aqueous fluids (see Section 9.3.1.2) but the initial rate of
22     appearance of nitrate may be quite slow by  comparison to that of nitrite. Thus plants exposed
23     to high proportions of NO could be at risk from elevated nitrite concentrations if additional
24     NiR  is not induced in the chloroplasts fast enough, especially if there are ample supplies of
25     nitrate (the accepted inducer) coming from the roots which preset the level of shoot NiR with
26     respect to nitrate.
27          During CO2-enrichment in greenhouses (see Section 9.3.1.1), fumigations with NO of
28     different cultivars of tomato (0.4 ppm for 3 h) or lettuce (cv. Pascal, 0.3 ppm for 8 days)
29     induce significant additional levels of NiR activity (Wellburn et al., 1980; Besford and Hand,
30     1989). In lettuce, the doubling of NiR activity may be accounted for by a significant
31      increase in amount of a 62 kD protein which reacts with  antibodies to NiR (Besford and
        August 1991
9-34
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      Hand, 1989). Nevertheless, there was a considerable difference in the responses of tomato
 2      (cv. Ailsa Craig) to fumigation with NO (1.5 ppm for 18 h) when the two enzymes NaR and
 3      NiR were compared (Murray and Wellburn, 1985).  No induction of NaR activities occurred
 4      but those of NiR were more than doubled.  This has the implication that additional NiR
 5      activity may be induced by nitrite rather than nitrate in certain circumstances. The pollutant
 6      NO,  however, has no effect on the basal level of NiR activity in another tomato cultivar,
 ,7      Sonato.                                                                   ..
 8           Sweet peppers (Capsicum annum L.) respond to NOX (1.5 ppm of either NO or NO2
 9      for 18 h) quite differently. Levels of activity of NiR in both Bell Boy and Rhumba cultivars
10      of sweet pepper are severely decreased by exposure to either NO or NO2 and, unlike some
11      cultivars of tomato, levels of NaR activities in pepper are unaffected by NOX (Murray and
12   ,:  Wellburn, 1985).  Tomato and pepper also differ in the manner by which their  metabolism of
13      N is regulated (Wallace and Steer, 1983).  Such varietal differences are particularly
14     interesting in view of a growth study .conducted by Anderson and Mansfield (1979) which
15     demonstrated that NO can affect the .growth of different  cultivars of tomato to various       :
16     extents.  The tomato cultivar most affected by NO (Ailsa Craig) in terms of growth was also
17     the one in which the respective activities of NaR and NiR were affected by fumigations with
 18     . either NO2 or NO (Wellburn etal.,  1980).
 19     .      From fumigation studies of spinach and kidney beans with high levels of NO2
20     (3.5-8 ppm), Yu et al. (1988) concluded that the relative tolerance of spinach over kidney
21     beans was not due to enhanced levels of NiR activity but to its enhanced ability to metabolize
22     nitrite using existing levels of NiR. They ascribed the growth reduction that did occur with
 23     spinach when exposed to NO2 in the light as. being mainly due to an accumulation of
 24     ammonia rather than of nitrite.
 25           When Yoneyama et al. (1979a) exposed kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Shin
 26     Edogawa), sunflower (Helianthus annum L. cv. Russian Mammoth) and maize (Zea mays L.
 27     cv. Dento) plants to 4 ppm NO2 either during the day or at night for up to 6 h, levels of NiR
 28     activity were increased in all cases but the rate of stimulation varied between species. While
 29      enzyme activities from sunflower leaves reacted rapidly to the presence of the gas, enzyme
 30      activity in maize increased slowly and to a lesser extent overall.  Darkness accentuated these
 31      differences.  Unfortunately, no allowance was  made for possible, natural diurnal rhythms of
        August 1991
9.35      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
31
 enzymic activity which occur, for example, with levels of NaR activities (Deng et al., 1990).
 This is an important consideration and many studies using NOX fumigation neglect this
 natural phenomenon. It is highly likely that sensitivity of plants to atmospheric pollutants
 like NOX shows a diurnal rhythmicity—a possibility never investigated and often ignored.

 9.3.2.3  Glutamate Formation and Conversion
      In higher plants, ammonia released by NiR is incorporated into glutamate by means of
 the glutamine synthetase (GS ; E.C.6.3.1.2)/ glutamine oxoglutarate aminotransferase or
 glutamate synthase (GOGAT ; E.G. 2.6.1.53) cycle (see Figures 9-6 and 9-7) rather than by
 animation achieved using glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH; E.G.  1.4.1.3; Lea and Miflin,
 1974; Miflin and Lea, 1976).  Activities of both enzymes of the GS/GOGAT cycle have been
 detected in chloroplasts but GS activity also occurs in the cytosol (Ernes and Fowler, 1979).
 That of GDH, by contrast, is confined to mitochondria (Miflin, 1970).
     Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Kinghorn Wax) exposed to 0.02-0.5 ppm NO2 for
 5 days show increased levels of GOGAT activity (Srivastava and Ormrod, 1984) while levels
 of related transaminase activities were raised in a sensitive tomato cultivar (Ailsa Craig) when
 exposed  for 14 days to 0.2-0.5 ppm NO (Wellburn et al., 1980).  Levels of GDH were also
 increased by this treatment but the higher constitutive levels of GS were unaffected. Peas
 (Piswn salivum L. cv. Feltham First), by contrast, showed no changes in levels of GDH
 activities when exposed to  0.1-0.5 ppm NO2 for 6 days although this enzyme is strongly
 affected by similar SO2,  NH3, SO2+ NH3 and SO2+ NO2 fumigations (Wellburn et al.,
 1976).
     It is presumed that  GDH operates in a deaminative mode during periods of excess
 reduced N formation after exposure to atmospheric NOX while the GS/GOGAT cycle
 (Figure 9-7) remains responsible for glutamate formation under these conditions.  One way to
 foUow such changes is to measure the ratios of GDH to GS activities because this removes
 the  base of expression (e.g.,  g"1 dry weight) which may also change in response to NOX
fumigation.  When studying the effects of lower levels of atmospheric NO2 (0.25 ppm for
63 days) on several clones and cultivars of the grass Lolium perenne L. using this method, a
significant increase in GDH activities occurred even though the measured GS activities were
still approximately fifty times those of GDH (Wellburn et al.,1981).  In other words, the
       August 1991
                                       9-36       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  Atmosphere
      Cytoplasm     Chloroplast

                                Glutamate
                                      GS
                                Glutamine
                                       GOGAT
                                Glutamate
                                                -glutarate
 from
Roots ~
     Cell
     wall
                               Mitochondrion
Figure 9-7. The possible interconversions between glutamate, glutamine and
         a-ketoglutarate which involve the uptake and release of ammonia in plants.
         The mitochondrial enzyme, glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) is much more
         likely to catalyze the deamination of glutamate in the light.
Source:  Wellburn (1988).
August 1991
                 9-37
                                        DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
  7
   8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
26
27
28
29
 non-induced conversion of ammonia to glutamate by GS (and GOGAT) in the plastids always
 predominates but a pathway catalyzed by GDH to remove excess glutamate from NO -treated
                                                                               X
 tissues appears in the cytoplasm of exposed cells.
      When crude extracts from spinach (Spinacia oleracea L. cv. New Asia) were treated
 with nitrite (5 mM), either in the light or the dark, levels of GS and GOGAT activities were
 reduced by 26 and  55% respectively (Yu et at., 1988). However, at levels of 25 mM nitrite,
 GS and GOGAT activities were inhibited by 87% in the light and 57% in the dark.   Yu et al.
 (1988) concluded that part of the toxicity ascribed to nitrite in these circumstances could be
 due to a failure of the GS/GOGAT cycle to remove ammonia fast enough.  This then permits
 uncoupling reactions to take place  (see Section 9.3.2.6) which then impairs ATP formation.

 9.3.2.4  Fluxes of  Amino Acids
      A frequent response of plants to NOX is an increase in leaf amino acid content (Prasad
 and Rao, 1980; Ito et al., 1984b, 1986; Takeuchi et al., 1985; Rowland, 1986). Even
 increases in root amino  acid content due to NO2 fumigations  have been detected (Rowland,
 1986).  Nevertheless, increased amino acid content is only a reflection of many interrelated
 processes—protein or amino acid biosynthesis and degradation, enhanced nitrate assimilation
 or reduced elimination of organic N.
      Reports of changes in individual amino acids due to NOX exposure are contradictory.
 Takeuchi et al. (1985), for example, report increases of glutamate in squash while Ito et al.
 (1986), using beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Shin Edogawa), detected the reverse.  Similar
 examples can be quoted for both aspartate and arginine.  In angiosperms, however, there does
 appear to be agreement over increases of asparagine and glutamine in response to NO
 (e.g., Prasad and Rao, 1980; Ito et al., 1984b, 1986).
     Studies on conifers show the reverse.  Levels of glutamine and arginine, an important
nitrogen  storage compound for species like Scots pine,  are much reduced by NO9 fumigation
(85 ppb for 10 days, Wingsle et al., 1987).  These reductions mainly account for the marked
reduction in total amino  acids in these trees—another disparity with the angiosperm literature.
       August 1991
                                         9-38
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
9.3,2.5 Effects of Ammonia
     Localized sources of ammonia, such as animal stockyards and ammonium nitrate
fertilizer plants, may have adverse effects on crops and conifers but other emissions from
livestock,  such as higher amines or H2S, can add to the effect (Van der Eerden, 1982).
Ammonia-affected conifers are usually prone to frost injury (see Section 10.4.2) but
reductions in crop growth are not always accompanied by visible injury.  Symptoms of injury
are necrosis on older leaves or needles and are often specific.  For example, black spots
occur on the backs of cauliflower and Brussel sprout leaves (Van der Eerden, 1982).
     Little research has been done to identify the specific biochemical and physiological
consequences to plants of external sources of ammonia which produce extra ammonium ions
inside a plant.  Inhibitory effects of ammonium ions acting as uncouplers of phosphorylation
in both mitochondria and chloroplasts have long been known.. In chloroplasts, this effect of
ammonia  is highly dependent on both light and pH (Crofts and Walker, 1970),  Losada and
Arnon (1963) used ammonium levels of 1 mM, equivalent to a dry weight content of 150 Mg
g"1, to inhibit photophosphorylation._ Such levels are frequently found  in ammonia-damaged
plant tissues.  Moreover, tomato plants (cv. Moneymaker) exposed to 2.86 ppm ammonia are
only injured in the dark when large amounts of ammonium (200 /ig g^PW) accumulate  in
plants  (Van der Eerden, 1982).  In the light, however, this injury does nojt occur because
ammonia  is immediately converted to glutamine and asparagine, levels of which rise sharply
if temperatures and carbohydrate contents are not limiting.  This could explain the extreme
sensitivity of conifers to ammonia during the winter.

9.3.3  Physiological Responses
     While the sections below concentrate on the effects of NOX alone, a recent review
(Darrall,  1989) has already considered many of the important physiological interactions
between NOX and other common air pollutants (see Section 9.6).  In terms of stomatal
responses and changes to root: shoot ratios, almost all the relevant  studies have been done
with mixtures of NOX, SO2 and/or O3 rather than NOX alone.
        August 1991
                                          9-39
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
31
 9.3.3.1 Dark Respiration
      Srivastava et al. (1975a,b) showed that dark respiration in Phaseolus vulgaris L.
 (cv. Pure Gold Wax) was more depressed by high levels of NO2 (1-7 ppm for 4-8 h) than
 photosynthesis at certain stages of the growth.  Moreover, this apparent inhibition could not
 be reversed quickly by removing NO2 from the fumigation stream which implies product
 build-up.  However, exposure of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) to atmospheric NO2
 (0.5 ppm) for 2 days (Oleksyn, 1984)  or fumigation of various mature ornamental pot plants
 in CO2-enriched atmospheres containing NOX (1 ppm NO or NO2) for 4 days (Saxe,
 1986a,b) failed to show any inhibitory effects on dark respiration.  In the latter studies,
 NO2 fumigations even showed slight stimulatory effects.  Carlson  (1983), however, did find
 an inhibition of dark respiration in soybean (Glycine max. Merr.) but only at the highest
 levels of NO2 employed (0.6 ppm for 2-3 h). By contrast, Sabaratnam et al. (1988b) also
 using soybeans (cv.  Williams) found that treatment with 0.2 ppm NO2 for 7 h day"1 for
 5 days increased dark respiration by 13% immediately and by 46% after the fumigation had
 been stopped.  Similarly, exposure of black turtle beans  (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Domino)
 to 0.1 ppm NO2 (7 h day"1 for 15 days) enhanced dark respiration during fumigation but this
 effect disappeared afterwards (Sandhu and Gupta,  1989).
      On balance, therefore, it must be concluded that it is unlikely that NOX pollution at
 realistic levels has a primary effect on dark respiration.  Nevertheless, secondary effects
 elicited by altered amino acid patterns or changes in levels of ammonium, nitrite, etc., may
 well take place and have an effect on mitochondrial enzymes  and levels of ATP (Matsumoto
 etal., 1971; Matsumoto and Wakiuchi, 1974).

 9.3.3.2 Effects on Photosynthesis
     Two types of experiment have been used to investigate the effects of atmospheric NO
 on photosynthetic reactions; those using techniques capable of monitoring these reactions
 in vivo using intact plants and those performed in vitro with extracts of plant tissue.  The
 latter usually involve isolated chloroplasts or  thylakoid membranes and examine the effects of
 the products of atmospheric NOX,  such  as nitrate and nitrite, on these suspensions.
     A good example of the in vivo approach, and probably the most important and
informative, has been to follow changes in the rates of uptake and release of CO2 using
       August 1991
                                         9-40      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      infrared gas analysis (IRGA) in the light and the dark in order to provide estimates of net
 2      photosynthesis.  Using IRGA, Hill and Bennett (1970) showed that both NO and NO2 (up to
 3      10 ppm for 2 h) inhibited net photosynthesis in intact leaves of oats (Avena sativa  L. cv.
 4      Park) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L. cv. Ranger). During 90 min fumigations, they found
 5      that the minimum concentrations to produce inhibition were 0.6 ppm for each of these two
 6      gases, which are well below those required to produce visible injury in each.  Furthermore,
 7      they found that inhibition was faster  with NO than NO2 and was reversible.  Mixed
 8      fumigations with both NO and NO2 were found to produce the same amount of inhibition as
 9      the sum of that produced by each pollutant alone (Hill and Bennett, 1970) but, in  subsequent
10     studies, the same group (White et al., 1974) failed to observe a depression of net
11      photosynthesis in alfalfa due to mixtures of NOX (0.25-0.4 ppm NO2 and 0.1-0.15 ppm NO
12 ,    for 1-2 h).
13          During their various studies of the rapidity by which various pollutants inhibit
14     photosynthesis, Bennett and Hill (1973) concluded that NO caused the fastest response,
15     followed in turn by NO2, SO2, O3 and HF. However, after 2-h exposure in each case, this
16     order was reversed if the overall  depressions of net photosynthesis were compared.
17          Subsequent reports using IRGA are also contradictory.  Srivastava et al. (1975a,b), for
18     example, concluded that their observed decrease in net photosynthesis was related to NO2
19     concentration and length of exposure even though they used high concentrations of NO2
20     (1-7 ppm for up to 5 h) on beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Pure Gold Wax).  Meanwhile,
21     Bull and Mansfield (1974) had found a similar effect of NO2 on peas (Pisum sativum L.
22     cv. Feltham First) but at much lower concentrations (0.05-0.25 ppm) for longer (28 days).
23     Subsequently, Capron and Mansfield (1976) exposed tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum
24     Mill. cv. Moneymaker) to mixtures of NO and NO2 (0.10-0.50 ppm each for 20  h) and
25     found an additive effect of the two gases on the inhibition of net photosynthesis.  Similarly,
26     Bruggink et al (1988) found a 38%  reduction in net photosynthesis of tomato (cv. Abunda)
27     exposed to 1 ppm NO at 350 ppm CO2 on the third day of exposure but rather less
28      (24%  reduction) at 1,000 ppm CO2. Both these reductions in photosynthesis could not be
 29      explained by increases in stomatal resistance.
 30           By contrast, Carlson (1983) fumigated soybeans (Glycine max Merr.) with NO2
 31      (0.2-0.6 ppm for 2-3 h) and was less convinced that NO2 had a significant effect on net
        August 1991
9-41
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
31
  photosynthesis measured by IRGA although he did find evidence for a reduction in
  photorespiration with increasing NO2 concentrations. Likewise, Oleksyn (1984) did not find
  any effect of NO2 (0.5-1 ppm) on net photosynthesis during a 2 day exposure of Scots pine
  (Finns sylvestris L.) seedlings. Saxe (1986a),  however, showed that reductions in net
  photosynthesis in 8 cultivars of 5 genera (Ficus, Hedera, Hibiscus, Dieffenbachia and
  Nephrolepis) took place at a lower dose of NO (1 ppm for 12 h) than those required to
  reduce transpiration (4 ppm for 5 h).  He also  showed that the toxicity of NO towards net
  photosynthesis was 22 times that of NO2.  Like Hill and Bennett (1970) and Srivastava et al.
  (1975a,b), he concludes that the main effects of NOX are on mesophyll cells rather than guard
  cells. He also maintains that only a proportion of the NO effect could be attributed to the
  stomata and that the mechanism of NO toxicity is different from that of NO0.
                                                                     2i
      It is now evident that different levels of NO2 can bring about both increases and
 decreases of net photosynthesis within the same species.  Sabaratnam et al. (1988a) found that
 low levels of NO2 (0.2 ppm, 7 h day-1 for 5 days) increase net photosynthesis in soybean
 (Glycine max Merr. cv. Williams) at the onset of fumigation and 24 h after fumigation
 ceases.  However, reductions in net photosynthesis are observed at higher levels of NO2
 (0.5 ppm) under the same exposure conditions.  These researchers also used the techniques of
 growth analysis on the same experimental material.  They found that the increase in leaf area
 ratio (LAR) of 42% brought about by 0.5 ppm  NO2 was insufficient to compensate for the
 large decrease (51%) of the net assimilation ratio  (NAR) which caused a decline in relative
 growth rate (RGR). These  observations are similar to those of Okano et al. (1985b) when
 they fumigated sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.  cv. Russian Mammoth) and maize (Zea
 mays L.  cv. Dento) with a range of NO2 concentrations (up to 1 ppm) for 14 days. At levels
 of 0.2 ppm, NAR was significantly raised (10%) but, at 0.5 ppm NO2, was reduced to a
 similar extent.  These changes in NAR could be accounted  for by changes in LAR.  NAR
 and RGR also increased when black turtle beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.  cv. Domino) were
 exposed to 0.1 ppm NO2 (7 h day"1) for  15 days (Sandhu and Gupta, 1989) but the LAR was
 unaffected.
     Assimilation rates of 13CO2 determined by 13C-NMR spectroscopy are not in accord
with the majority of IRGA studies of the effects of NO2 on net photosynthesis.  This is partly
explained by the fact that this technique measures only unidirectional uptake of CO0 while
                                                                      1    £-1
       August 1991
                                        9-42      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     IRGA measures bidirectional flow of CO2.  Exposure of kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.
 2     cv. Shin Edogawa) to 2 ppm NO2 for 4 days enhanced 13CO2 fixation by 18% in the primary
 3     leaves and 39% in the first trifoliate leaves (Okano et al., 1985a).  However, shorter
 4     exposures (10 min) of similar plants to equivalent levels of NO2 had no effect on
 5     13CO2 uptake but there was a significant increase in the pool sizes of sucrose and fructose
 6     (Ito et al., 1985a) which indicates changes in translocation.  Meanwhile, large differences
 7     were noted in the fluxes of label between amino acids such as glycine and serine, which are
 8     key metabolites during photorespiration, demonstrating that recycling of label takes place.
 9           Studies of the effects of NO2 alone on carbon allocation are rare.  Amounts of soluble
10     sugars,  especially glucose, in kidney beans (cv. Shin Edogawa) exposed to high levels of
11     NO2 (2-4 ppm for 7 days) were significantly decreased in the roots by 4 ppm NO2, implying
12     reduced translocation; but soluble sugar content in leaves fluctuated markedly with  no clear
13     trend (Ito et al.,  1985b).  In these studies, reductions in root sugar content correlated with
14     reduced root dry weight.  It might be expected that decreased sugar content might account for
15     reductions in root respiration. Ito et al. (1985b) did  find decreased root respiration but it
16     required the full  7 days of exposure at 2 ppm NO2 for this to occur.
17           Another non-invasive technique which is able to determine rates of photosynthesis
18     exploits relative changes in  chlorophyll fluorescence.  When a dark-adapted plant is
19     illuminated, chlorophyll molecules fluoresce in vivo and the intensity of this prompt
20     fluorescence varies with time in a characteristic manner.  Consequently, effects of
21     environmental stress on photosynthetic reactions have been studied in vivo by monitoring the
22     change in fluorescence with time. Changes in the patterns of in vivo fluorescence  in response
23    ' to chilling injury (Melcarek and Brown,  1977), O3 (Schreiber et al., 1978) and heavy metals
24      (Arndt, ,1974; Homer et al., 1980) have all been reported.
25           Exposure of tomato or sweet pepper to 1.5 ppm NO2 for up to 4 days had virtually no
26      effect on either the pattern of induction or the peak values of emitted fluorescence  (Murray,
27      1984).  However, Shimazaki (1988) has been  able to demonstrate an effect of NO2 on
28      chlorophyll fluorescence induction using radish plants but only using high levels of pollutant
29      (4 ppm) while fumigating in the dark. When  chloroplasts were subsequently isolated from
30      these plants, no  effects on their photochemical activities could be detected.   By contrast,
31    '  exposure to both nitrite and nitrate can affect the fluorescence yield from algal cells (Kessler
        August 1991
9-43
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
31
 and Zumft, 1973; Serrano et al., 1981) but prior treatment of such cells using sonication or
 Triton X is required before any effect may be detected with nitrate (Serrano et al., 1981).
 Nitrite treatments, however, do not need this denaturation before showing such an effect.
 Moreover, the effect of nitrite under these circumstances is concentration-dependent.
      Discrepancies  between individual in vivo studies of NOX effects on net photosynthesis
 and on dark respiration  (Section  9.3.3.1) lead to the general conclusion that, in many
 instances, investigators have been dealing with different exposure conditions and with
 situations where different levels of NO2 can produce opposing effects. It is now clear that
 many studies claiming to have fumigated just with NO2 may have also contained NO but,
 worse than that, many control treatments which have used activated charcoal to clean the air
 may have still contained significant levels of NO (see Section 9.3,2).  In many instances,
 when the levels of NO2  used were relatively  high, little or no comment has been made on the
 parallel levels of NO. Where NO has been specifically identified then the inhibitory effects
 described are more pronounced.  For example, fumigation of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.
 cv.  Ambassador) growing at high CO2 (950 ppm) with 2 ppm NO and 0.5 ppm NO2 reduced
 net photosynthesis by 15-20% within 30 min (Caporn,  1989).
     As discussed elsewhere (Section 9.3.1.2), the major product of NO2 in solution is
 nitrate which  rises quite  markedly within cells with little consequence.  However,  both
 NO and NO2 produce nitrite in solution which may be highly toxic.  Consequently, any
 explanations of in vivo changes, using experimental evidence derived from parallel in vitro
 studies involving separated systems, concentrate on the specific effects of nitrite rather than
 nitrate within chloroplasts especially as the plastids are also the sites of NiR activity
 (see Section 9.3.2.2).
     Nitrite uptake into plastids is profoundly affected  by darkness, temperature and the level
 of nitrate ions (Brunswick and Cresswell, 1988a) as weU as the stromal pH, the rate of nitrite
 reduction, and the internal levels of plastidic nitrite. It now appears that there is a specific
 protein carrier system on the inner chloroplast envelope to allow uptake of nitrite which is
 distinct from that of  the phosphate or sulfate translocators (Brunswick and Cresswell,  1988b).
 Consequently, nitrite can enter chloroplasts and act as an indirect proton pump across the
plastid envelopes (Heber  and  Purczeld, 1978). This inward movement of acidity has an
affect on both stromal pH levels and trans-thylakoid proton gradients.  A reduction in stromal
       August 1991
                                         9-44       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      pH, for example, may affect the reactions of the Calvin cycle because the activity of enzymes
 2      like ribulose-l,5-M5-phosphatecarboxylase/oxygenase(RubisCO) are pH-dependent
 3      (Heldt et al., 1986).  Purczeld et al. (1978) have shown that adding nitrite to a suspension of
 4      spinach chloroplasts causes a reduction of the stromal pH which then inhibits the fixation
 5      ofC02.
 6           Unlike ammonium Ions (see Section 9.3.2.5), nitrite has no inhibitory effect on in vitro
 7      determinations of the rates of phosphorylation (Asada et al., 1968) which implies that both
 8      nitrite and ammonia levels are tightly controlled if the influx of N is slow enough.  However,
 9      a possible site of action for nitrite within thylakoid membranes has been demonstrated.  Using
10     ESR spectroscopy to monitor the release of manganese from the water-splitting complex in a
11      preparation of pepper chloroplast thylakoids before and after the addition of 2.0 mmoles of
12     nitrite (0.02 mM final concentration), Wellburn (1984) found that nitrite enhanced the release
13     of bound manganese from thylakoids and suggested the involvement of free radical events in
14     this response similar to those predicted by Mudd (1982).
15           As mentioned elsewhere (Section 9.3.1.2), acidification processes are also thought to be
16     important in factors in the toxicity of nitrite.  Robinson and Wellburn (1983), using red
17     light-induced quenching of 9-amino-acridine (9-AA) fluorescence,  have shown that high
 18     concentrations of nitrite around 0.5 mM can reduce the pH gradient across the thylakoid
 19     membranes of oats (Avena sativa L. cv. Pinto). The mechanism of this effect is still
20     uncertain but it is probable that a free radical mechanism is involved because there are many
21      similarities  between the effects of O3 alone and the combined effects of nitrite and sulfite
 22      (Robinson and Wellburn, 1983) which could arise from mixed exposures to SO2 and NOX.
 23      (see Section 9.6.4.4).
 24           This similarity in response between O3 alone and mixtures of SO2 and NOX has been
 25      known for some time (Reinert et al., 1975).  Furthermore, mixed fumigations of peas
 26     (cv.  Waverex) with either 03 alone (0.15 ppm) or with  SO2 + NO2 + O3 (0.05 ppm each)
 27     for 21 days enhance the levels of activity of ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione reductase
 28     (Mehlhorn  et al., 1987); both of which are involved in free radical scavenging. Similarly,
 29     when wheat (Triticum aestivum L.  cv. RR21) was grown for 80 days in atmospheres
 30     containing  NO2 (1 ppm, 2 h day"1), significant reductions (17%) in ascorbate levels were
 31     detected (Prasad and Rao, 1980).
         August 1991
9-45
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
31
       Wellburn (1985) fumigated barley (cv. Patty) seedlings for 1-3 days with NO2
  (0.28 ppm) and measured the levels of nitrite and nitrate inside the chloroplasts using HPIC.
  Levels of nitrate actually fell by 45%  inside the plastids to 1.2 mM on the second day before
  rising back to the clean-air control levels while levels of nitrite rose from 0.1 mM to
  0.15 mM before falling back over the same period.  Unfortunately, similar experiments have
  not been carried out using NO as  a fumigant gas.  In response to increases of 0.5 mM nitrite,
  Robinson and Wellburn (1983) detected reductions of mm-thylakoid proton gradients of
  about a whole pH unit using preparations of oat chloroplasts.  This would imply severely
  impaired abilities of the photosynthetic membranes to sustain ATP  formation. Reductions in
  stromal pH and changes in levels of NADPH, ATP, triose phosphates and orthophosphate are
  well known to reduce carbon  fixation (Bassham, 1971;  Foyer, 1986; Heldt et al., 1986).  In
 a wider context, therefore, reduced availability of ATP for synthesis of starch, amino acids
 and protein, etc., will also limit growth, repair and other physiological processes.
      Another implication of elevated nitrite levels  inside chloroplasts is the possibility that
 reduction of nitrite may take preference over the reduction of NADP+ and fixation of CO2
 (Thomas et al,, 1976;  Larsson et al., 1985).  At levels of 0.5 mM  nitrite, CO2 fixation is
 reduced by as much as 50% because NADP+ fails to compete with nitrite for electrons
 coining through the photosynthetic electron transport chain from water (Magalhaes et al.,
 1974). Robinson (1986, 1988), however, claims that CO2 and nitrite do not compete for
 reductant at saturating  light intensities.   In an attempt to resolve these inconsistencies, Peirson
 and Elliott (1988) have examined the effect of bicarbonate  on the nitrite
 utilization/concentration interrelationships at the whole plant level.   They conclude that, while
 there are differences between species, fixation of CO2 and  reduction of nitrite only compete
 at low light levels and  high nitrite concentrations.  But these are the very conditions  that
 prevail in plants exposed to atmospheric NOX in northern latitudes.  Consequently, this
 competition for reductant is likely to be a very important component in any physiological
 explanation of lack of growth caused by NO .

9,3.3.3 Root Physiology
     Conditions around the root may also be involved in determining the response of a plant
to NOX (Anderson and  Mansfield, 1979; Mansfield  and Murray, 1984).  Normally, roots
       August 1991
                                         9-46
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     provide all the N requirements of the shoots and any changes in the metabolism of nitrate by
 2   ,  roots in response to NOX is likely to determine the overall N balance of plants. More than
 3     one possible pathway exists in leaves for the absorption of N from NO2 (see
 4     Section 9.3.1.5).
 5          Amounts entering through the roots by an air-soil-root pathway, although small, are not
 6     insignificant. Tracer experiments using 15N-labeled NO2 have shown uptake by roots after
 7     NO2 has been absorbed into the soil as well as direct incorporation through the leaves
 8     (Yoneyama et al.,  1980a,b; see also Section 9.3.1.4).  Any atmospheric NO2 absorbed by the
 9     soil is  likely to be  converted to nitrate and nitrite by soil microorganisms (see Chapter
10     10.1.3). Yoneyama et al. (1979b) found that although nitrite only accumulates in the upper
11     soil layer, increases in ammonia also occur in soils  exposed to NO2.  It appears that soil
12     water content is  an important factor in determining  the presence of these ions.  Spierings
13     (1971) found increases in soil nitrate concentration which had been fumigated with 0.25 ppm
14     NO2 for 45 days.  Some N derived from NO2 can therefore be taken up by roots and
15     metabolized into plant constituents but this process takes longer.
16          At high concentrations of 15NO2 (4.8 ppm), amounts of 15N taken up by roots via the
17     soil are insignificant when compared to direct incorporation through the leaves over periods
18     of an hour (Yoneyama et al., 1980a,d).  However,  over a week after the 15NO2 fumigation
19     had been terminated, up to 54% of the labeled NO2 eventually entered  through the roots.
20     Therefore, the soil route may only be important under long term exposures.  Similarly,
21     investigations involving  solution culture of plants have shown that an indirect route via the
22     roots under these conditions could involve a very substantial input of N derived from NO2.
23     As might have been expected, there was a dramatic increase in nitrate concentration in a
24     recirculating hydroponic system over 24 h due to exposure of the solutions to 0.3 ppm NO2
25     (Rowland, 1985).  There may be similar implications for irrigated crops.
26          Only one study has been made of the effect of NO2 on the nodulation of legumes.
27     Srivastava and Ormrod (1986) exposed 8-day old Phaseolus vulgaris L. (cv. Kinghorn Wax)
28     seedlings to various levels of NO2 (0.02 to 0.5 ppm,  6 h day"1 for 15 d).  They found
29     exposure to atmospheric NO2 increased the levels of N in the roots but decreased nodule
30     weight and levels of nitrogenase activity.  This is what would have been predicted if more
        August 1991
9-47
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1      N as a proportion of total N is taken up by the leaves as NOX since high root N inhibits
  2      nodulation.
  3
  4      9.3.4  Tissue and Organ Responses
  5      9.3.4.1 Lipid and Membrane Effects
  6           Plants exposed to high concentrations of NO2 usually show a characteristic water-soaked
  7      appearance before necrosis takes place (see van Haut and Stratmanri, 1967).  From similar
  8      observations, Berge (1963) concluded that NO2 causes cellular plasmolysis due to the
  9      breakdown of lipids in membranes. Unsaturated lipids in monolayers readily bind molecules
10      like NO2 (Felmeister et al., 1970) and direct peroxidation of fatty acids as a consequence of
11      this attached NO2 has been studied extensively (Estefan et al., 1970; Roehm et al., 1971a;
12      Rowland and Gause, 1971; Pryor and Lightsey,  1981).  Two types of reactions take place
13      within fatty acids. Attachment of the NO2 to a double bond may cause a cis to trans
14      isomerization or it may cause the removal of hydrogen from methylene groups.  Both
15      processes may initiate lipid peroxidation as well as changes in the surface properties of
16      monolayers.  The question then arises: "Could similar detrimental changes take place in
17      membranes of plants exposed to realistic levels of NO2?".  Mudd et al.  (1984) concluded that
18      the ambient levels of NO2 are much too low to have such effects.
19           Ambient levels of O3,  rather than those of NO2, are far more likely to initiate
20      peroxidation of lipids within membrane systems  (Roehm et al., 1971b) but it is not certain if
21      the proteins or lipids of membranes are oxidized preferentially. Mudd et al. (1984) discussed
22      both possibilities and cited studies involving proteins which favored the idea that attack by
23      O3 occurs more readily on proteins.  Clearly,  this whole field should be reexamined and such
24      studies should include mixed effects of NO2, NO and O3 upon membranes because a
25      photodynamic equilibrium exists naturally in the atmosphere (Section 9.3.1.1) and some
26      previous O3 exposures  may have inadvertently included various mixtures of NO and NO2
27      (Section 9.2.2).
28           There are strong indications that atmospheric NO2 inhibits lipid biosynthesis  rather than
29      causing damage to existing lipids in membranes.  Fumigation of Pinus bariksiana seedlings
30      with 2 ppm for 2 days  inhibited the biosynthesis of phospholipids and galactolipids (Malhotra
31      and  Khan, 1984) while high levels of nitrite (25  mM) exert a similar effect in Chlorella
       August 1991
9-48
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     pyrenoidosa (Yung and Mudd, 1966).  Inhibition of the latter is greater in the dark than the
 2     light possibly because adequate amounts of NADPH are not available at night.
 4     9.3.4.2  Changes inside Cells and Tissues
 5           The amount of damage suffered by a plant varies in its severity according to various
 6     factors such as concentration and length of exposure, plant age, edaphic factors, light,
 7     humidity, etc. Symptoms are often divided into "invisible" (or hidden) injury and obvious
 8     "visible" injury.  In the former there is an overall reduction in growth but no obvious signs
 9     of visible injury.  It is often associated with decreases in transpiration and photosynthesis (see
10     Section 9.3.3.2) but a variety of ultrastructural changes have also been associated with
11     "invisible" air pollution injury (Huttunen and Soikkeli, 1984; Fink, 1988).
12           Ultrastructural examination of bean leaves exposed to NO2 has shown changes in the
13     ultrastructure of both mitochondria and chloroplasts due to this pollutant.  In an early series
14     of experiments studying the effects of exceptionally large quantities of NO2 (1%  or
15     1,000 ppt) on Phaseolus vulgaris, Dolzmann and Ullrich (1966)  observed protrusions from
16     both plastids and mitochondria which appeared to enclose the latter.  In later experiments,
17     using lower amounts of NO2 (0.5-3 ppm for 2-4 h) on broad bean (Viciafaba L.  cv.
18     Windsor Harlington) leaves, the observed swelling of the plastid thylakoids was interpreted at
19     the time as a response to ionic effects such as a build up of osmoticalry active compounds
20     which could then have an effect on photosynthesis (Wellburn etal., 1972). During short
21     exposures of 1 h at 0.5 ppm NO2, this swelling was reduced when the leaves were returned
22     to unpolluted air.  What is not certain, as with all studies  of this nature, is if such ionic
23     changes actually occur at the time of exposure or during the processing for electron
24     microscopy. Huttunen and Soikkeli (1984) in their review of ultrastructural effects of air
25     pollutants argue for the former and suggest that this type of swelling is a general symptom of
26     acute injury found with many different types of air pollutants because it is also shown by
27     many of their samples and those of others taken from polluted locations outdoors where  the
28     pollution climate has not been defined.
29           In the only other specific ultrastructural study of atmospheric NOX on plants, Lopata
30     and Ullrich (1975) found tubular protrusions from the plastid envelope closely associated with
31     mitochondria.  This ultrastructural feature can also be induced by imperfect fixation
        August 1991
9-49
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1      (Wellburn, 1982) so, like many other aspects of these studies of cellular pathology, not a
  2      great deal of useful information on the specific effects of atmospheric NOX, or any other type
  3      of air pollutant, can be gained from the use of the conventional transmission electron
  4      microscope.
  5           Most plants appear able to tolerate an accumulation of nitrate even though this may be
  6      undesirable if they subsequently form apart of the human diet  (Roberts etal., 1983).   An
  7      accumulation of nitrites, however, can have serious toxic effects on plants.  As already
  8      described (Section 9.3.1.7), an accumulation of nitrite is sometimes detected when plants are
  9      exposed to NO2 (Zeevaart, 1976; Yoneyama et al., 1979a) but not always (Spierings, 1971).
10      No direct evidence exists to prove that the nitrite ion itself is toxic to plants (Heber and
11      Purczeld, 1978; Lee, 1978) but a number of investigators have concluded that it is the
12      acidification which accompanies the accumulation of nitrite which accounts for the toxicity
13      (Bingham et al., 1954;  Zeevaart, 1976; Lee, 1978).  Nitrite ions are reduced inside the
14      chloroplast (Section 9.3.2.2) and therefore all  pollutant-derived N is likely to enter the
15      chloroplast eventually.  Although possible reactions between nitrite and cellular constituents
16      during the passage of the ion into the chloroplast must not be overlooked, interest in the toxic
17      reactions of high levels of NOX has concentrated upon the chloroplast and especially on the
18      photosynthetic reactions. Some of these have  been discussed already (Section  9.3.3.2).
19           Zeevaart (1976) concluded that acidification will only damage plants at high
20      concentrations of NO2 since nitrite reductase requires six protons from the stroma for every
21      nitrite ion reduced. The pH will only change  if the number of protons entering the
22      chloroplast exceeds the amount removed by the reduction of nitrite.  However, he  was unable
23      to explain the effects of NO2 (5 ppm for 1 h)  on Nicotiana glutinosa in the light by assuming
24      acidification; although the injury did seem to be linked to condition of the thiol groups.
25      Interestingly, nitrite is known to affect thiol-containing proteins (Hewitt, 1975; see also
26      Section 9.6.4.4) which  are important, for example, in the regulation of
27      fructose-l,6-My-phosphatase activity (Buchanan etal., 1979).
28
29      9.3.5  Secondary Metabolic Responses
30           One of the most obvious effects of NOX on plants in the short term is that frequently
31      they are a deeper green color than those grown in clean air.  This was clearly  evident, for
        August 1991
.9-50
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     example, when Horsman and Wellborn (1975) reported a 10% increase in chlorophyll content
 2     of peas (cv. Feltham First) exposed to 1 ppm NO2 for 6 days. After longer periods, this
 3     effect disappears and thereafter NO2 has an inhibitory effect on pigment biosynthesis
 4     (Zeevaart,  1976).  More recently, Sandhu and Gupta (1989) found large increases in both
 5     chlorophyll a (130%) and chlorophyll b (193%) immediately after exposing black turtle beans
 6     (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Domino) to 0.1 ppm NO2 (7 h d"1) for 15 days but, at maturity,
 7     levels of both had fallen overall by 14%. Similarly, Sabaratnam et al. (1988a) found that
 8     exposure of soybean (cv. Williams) to NO2 (0.2 ppm, 7 h d"1 for 5 d) had a stimulatory
 9     effect on chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll content, while 0.3 ppm had no effect and
10     0.5 ppm reduced all chlorophyll levels by 45%.
11          Unlike O3 (Pell and Pearson, 1984), NO2 does not have an effect on glycoalkaloid
12     content (Sinn and Pell, 1984) and there are no reports of NO2-induced changes in levels of
13     polyamines. However, Mehlhorn and Wellburn (1987) detected threefold increases in
14     emissions of stress ethylene from peas (cv. Feltham First)  exposed to either NO or NO2
15     (0.15 ppm each) even though no visible injury occurred.  When combinations of either NO or
16     NO2 (50-150 ppb each for 7 h) were given along with 50 ppb O3, ethane as well as ethylene
17     was also evolved but, more significantly, extensive visible injury did occur.  Mehlhorn and
18     Wellburn  (1987) concluded from these observations that, while stress ethylene formation
19     determines plant sensitivity to O3, other air pollutants like NO or NO2 may enhance
20     O3-mediated injury by initiating stress ethylene formation.
21
22
23     9.4 EXPOSURE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIPS
24     9.4.1  Foliar Injury and Loss in Aesthetic Value
                          jij
25          Foliar injuries from NO2 are rarely observed at the  ambient concentrations that occur
26     in North America (see Chapter 7), but acute exposures from accidental  spills or releases can
27     induce foliar symptoms in sensitive plant species. A symptom is usually considered to be a
28     change from the normal appearance of some part of the plant, most often  in its' foliage, that is
29       *Injury has been defined as "any change in the appearance and/or function of a plant that is detrimental to
30      the plant."  American Phytopathological Society. 1974.  Glossary of air pollution terms and selected reference
31      list. Phytopathol. News 8: 5-8.
       August 1991
9-51
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     observable by the unaided eye or through a lens of low magnification. Generally, these
  2     changes involve the death, discoloration, distortion, or loss of foliar tissue.
  3          Foliar symptoms have a practical significance in three ways. Firstly, they constitute a
  4     diminution of the aesthetic or economic value of the plant when this depends upon the
  5     appearance of its foliage. Secondly, they offer one diagnostic means for assessing the
  6     occurrence of NO2-induced effects in vicinities of some sources (Taylor and MacLean,  1970;
  7     Donagi and Goren,  1979).  Thirdly, because symptoms are an easily observed manifestation
  8     of a change in the state of the plant, they are a means of determining the nature of the plant's
  9     response to NO2 and the effects of various factors upon it.
 10
 11     9.4.1.1  Characteristics of Foliar Symptoms
 12          There is no single type of symptom that is distinctive for NO2-induced foliar injury
 13     (National Research Council, 1977), and the types induced by NO2 are similar to those
 14     induced by other air pollutants, such as sulfur dioxide (SO2), hydrogen fluoride (HP), or
 15     ozone (O3) (Matsushima, 1977).  The kind of lesion produced and its location on the leaf
 16     depend upon concentration of NO2, morphology of leaf, and species of plant.  Consequently,
 17     diagnoses must evaluate the kind, size, and distribution of lesions on a leaf as well as the
 18     pattern of their occurrence among leaves on the same plant and different species of plants in
 19     the same location.  NO2-induced foliar symptoms have been illustrated in color plates (van
20     Haut and Stratmann, 1967; Lacasse and Treshow, 1976; Malhotra and Blauel,  1980; Taylor
21     and MacLean, 1970) and described  synoptically (Lacasse and Treshow, 1976; National
22     Research Council, 1977) or with reference to individual species of plants (Czech and
23     Nothdurft, 1952; van Haut and Stratmann, 1967).
24          Descriptions of symptoms (and defoliation) resulting from acute exposures to NO2
25     under experimental conditions are summarized  below for several broad groupings of plants
26     (van Haut and Stratmann, 1967; Taylor and MacLean, 1970; Lacasse and Treshow,  1976;
27     MacLean etal., 1968).
28          Broad-leaved (dicotyledonous) plants:  Injury to leaves of broad-leaved plants from an
29     acute exposure to NO2 is usually characterized  by the rapid appearance of irregularly-shaped
30     intercostal lesions.  The earliest indications of injury are gray-green water-soaked areas
31      located on the upper surface of the leaf.  Tissues in these areas collapse, become dry and
       August 1991
9-52
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     bleached, turn white-to-tan, and extend through the leaf to its upper to lower surface.  The
 2     resulting necrotic lesions are usually indistinguishable from those produced by SO2.  On most
 3  •   broad-leaved plants, NO2-induced lesions are distributed between the veins over the entire
 4     leaf surface and eventually may fall from the leaf, leaving irregular holes with darkened
 5     margins.  Occasionally, the lesions may increase in size, coalesce,  and form necrotic strips
 6     between the veins.  In some species of plants, NO2-induced injury tends to Occur more
 7 ''   frequently along the margins of the leaf.  For example, necrosis on maple and oak leaves
 8     often begins at the margins or the tips of the lobes and extends into the mid-portions of
 9     leaves.  In species with finely dissected compound leaves, such as  carrot and parsley,
10     NO2-induced injury is usually confined to the tips and margins of the leaflets.
11           Narrow-leaved faionocotyledonous') plants:  Acute exposures to NO2 of narrow-leaved
12     plants most frequently result in a necrosis that is yellow-to-ivory-to-white and begins at or
13     just below the tips of leaf blades.  Necrotic margins  and striped necrotic lesions between the
14     veins also occur. In most grains and grasses, injury from acute exposure affects the entire
15     width of the leaf blade, and area of the affected portion varies with the magnitude of the
16     exposure.  Grains also develop longitudinal necrotic  strips between the veins, and these can
17     coalesce to form large necrotic areas on  the leaf surface.  The awns (beards) of rye and
18     barley spikes are also  susceptible to injury from NO2; bleached necrosis begins at the tips and
19     progresses towards the base.
20           Coniferous plants:  Injury to leaves of conifers from acute exposures to NO2 usually
21     begins at the tips of the needles and progresses towards the base.   In the initial stages of
22     injury,  the tips of needles  take on a dull, gray-green color which becomes light brown and
23     then  dark brown or red-brown. The boundary between healthy and injured tissues is sharply
24     delineated by a brown or red-brown band.  Young, emerging needles develop NO2-induced
25     injury at their tips, whereas older needles may occasionally develop necrosis in the medial  or
26     basal portions of the needle.
27           Most of the foliar lesions described above are produced by an irreversible necrosis,
28      chlorosis, or bronzing of the affected tissue, but  there are foliar symptoms that can take other
29      forms.   For example, some symptoms are characterized by the appearance of a deeper green
30      coloration of the leaf, which is often accompanied by a distortion  of the leaf.  In addition,  the
31      foliar chlorosis that results from extended  or recurrent exposures to relatively  low
        August 1991
9-53
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 concentrations of NO2 can often be a transitory change, and young leaves recover and
 become green again after exposure has ceased.
      The abscission of the leaf itself can also be symptomatic of exposure to NO2 under two
 general circumstances.  With acute exposures, defoliation of young leaves occurs without the
 concomitant development of foliar lesions in citrus exposed to very high NO2 (150 ppm for
 four hours or 250 ppm for one hour) (MacLean et al.,  1968).  Injured needles of conifers
 may drop prematurely; spruce needles drop shortly after injury develops; injured larch and fir
 needles may not fall for several months; and injured pine needles can remain on the tree for
 more than a year. However, if injury is severe, with necrosis covering more than half of the
 needle surface, defoliation usually occurs within a month.  With chronic exposures,
 defoliation is the sequel to accelerated aging and premature senescence with chlorosis  and
 death (Thompson et al., 1971; Spierings, 1971; Thompson et al., 1970;  Sinn and Pell, 1984).

 9.4.1.2 Exposure-effect Relationships
     Three important characteristics of foliar injury with respect to the structure of its
 relationship to exposure are: (1) there is a zero baseline, that is, lesions produced by other
 agents are absent or clearly distinguishable from those induced by NO2 (at least under
 experimental conditions); (2) a threshold, exposure must be exceeded for  the production of
 injury; (3) measures of its occurrence are monotonic functions of concentration of NO2 or
 duration of exposure. Measures of effect are usually based on the incidence and severity of
 foliar injury. Incidence is usually represented with reference to number of leaves per  plant or
 number of plants per sample with lesions,  and severity with reference to  the area of a  leaf or
 total amount of foliar tissue of a plant that is affected by these lesions.

 Short-term (Acute) Exposures
     Neither incidence nor severity of foliar injury have been expressed as explicit functions
 of the variables of concentration (C) and duration of exposure (T) for exposures to NO2.
Nevertheless, a relationship between the concentration of NO2 (C:) required  to produce a
certain percentage of foliar injury  (I) and the duration of exposure was tested in short-term
 (S8 hours) exposures with eleven species of plants (Heck and Tingey, 1979)  and  is given in
Equation 1.  This represents a development of the O'Gara-Thomas form, which was
       August 1991
                                         9-54
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 2
 3
 4

 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
[1]         q = a0 + a1l + a2T                   .
derived for the effects of SO2 (Thomas and Hill, 1935) and is expressed in Equation 2 with
the substitution of the terms cz,for a0 + a1 I and kj for a2.  The parameter c7
                          '1
[2]        • Cj = Cj + kj T'                or   Cj > c7
expresses an asymptotic value for concentration, that is, one that would produce foliar injury
no greater than I if applied indefinitely.  The two forms are equivalent in expressing the
relationship between concentration and duration for the threshold (I = 0).
     Alternatives to the O'Gara-Thomas equation have been proposed for the threshold for
SO2-induced foliar injury (Guderian et al., 1960; Zahn, 1963; Guderian, 1977), and a simple
approximation to these forms is given by the inclusion of the parameter b in Equation 3.  For
the defoliation of citrus by acute exposures to NO2, it was proposed
[3]         q = c0 + k0 Tb              for   C: > c0 ;  1 > b  > 0
that b was about equal to 1 (MacLean et al., 1968); for the threshold of a particular chlorotic
symptom on leaves of pea (Zeevaart, 1976), b would have a value of about 0.5; and, for the
threshold for foliar injury in alfalfa with duration in the range of 2  to 200 hours and        ;
concentration of NO2 from 1 to 7 ppm (Zahn,  1975) b would have a value of about 0.8.
       Another approach, which was based upon the assumption that the tolerance of
elements of foliar tissue to injury follows a log-normal distribution, was developed and tested
for the effects of SO2 and O3 (Larsen and Heck, 1976).  This is expressed by Equation 4
where:  I is the fraction of foliar area injured;  Cj is the concentration that
[4]        Cl = cmT-bsz           withl  = f(z)
produces this amount of  injury with an exposure of duration equal to T (in hours); cm is the
concentration required to produce injury on 50% of the foliar tissue on a plant of median
tolerance in a one-hour exposure; s is the geometric standard deviation of the tolerance
distribution; z is a standard normal variate (i.e., normally distributed with mean equal to zero
and variance equal to unity); and, § is the integral of the normal distribution function.
Although this has not been tested with NO2, it could be applicable.
      These relationships are consistent with what is known about the mechanisms of action of
NO2 (Section 9.3). For example,  it can be assumed that the rate of uptake of NO2 is to be
        August 1991
                                          9-55
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     proportional to its atmospheric concentration and that injury results when the rate of uptake of
  2     NO2 exceeds a certain Value over a given period of time. This differential in rates would
  3     presumably be expressed by the term C - c0 (Equation 3), which could also be taken to
  4     represent the difference between the rates of influx and metabolic removal of toxic products
  5     within the foliar tissue. Accordingly, a NO2-induced increase in the rate of level of nitrate
  6     and nitrite reductase could increase the threshold (c0), an NO2-induced increase in stomatal
  7     resistance could decrease uptake (C), and a change in the differential between rates of influx
  8     and detoxification during exposure could be represented by the parameter b.
  9          When the concentration of NO2 fluctuates during an exposure, the dynamics  of response
 10     comprise those of the recovery processes, and a continuous exposure can be more  effective
 11     than intermittent exposures of the same cumulative duration.  For example, a continuous
 12     exposure of 60 minutes produced about 50% more injury than did three 20-minute exposures
 13     separated by intervals of 10 minutes (Matsushima,  1971). Similarly, a series of seven
 14     30-minute exposures declined in effectiveness with an increase in the length of the period
 15     between exposures from 10 to 45 minutes (Zahn, 1975).
 16          Based on experimentally derived estimates for the parameters in Equation 1, the
 17     concentrations of NO2 required to produce 5%  foliar injury for different durations of
 18     exposure are given in Figure 9-8 for three categories of plants—sensitive, intermediate, and
 19     tolerant (Heck and Tingey, 1979).  It should be noted that for sensitive plants,  the
20     concentrations range from 6 ppm for 0.5 hours to 2 ppm for 8 hours.  These concentrations
21     are, respectively, from 120- to 40-fold greater than the NAAQS primary standard of
22     0.05 ppm, and it has been observed that the ratio of a one-hour maximum concentration to
23     the annual arithmetic mean concentration rarely exceeds the value of 12 (Chapter 8, U.S.
24     Environmental Protection Agency,  1982).
25
26     Long-term (Chronic) Exposures
27         The derivation of an exposure-effect relationship for foliar injury is inherently more
28     problematic for a long-term (chronic) exposure than for an acute exposure because it involves
29     the aggregation of a series of lower-level episodes.  Ill addition to the problem posed by the
30     dynamics of response and recovery during and following a single exposure, there is the
       August 1991
9-56
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
       a
       a
       u

       c
       0

       f
       a
       L
        c

        8
                                    Hoirs of Exposure
Figure 9-8. Minimum exposures to NO2 required to produce 5% foliar injury on

           sensitive, intermediate, and tolerant categories of plants (after Heck and

           Tingey, 1979).
August 1991
9-57      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  problem of the degree to which the concentration of NOX and duration in one exposure can
  act to sensitize or desensitize the plant to the effect of NOX in an ensuing exposure.
       Experimental investigations have used two kinds of regimes: one has been a uniform
  concentration applied continuously for a period of several days to several weeks; the other
  comprised a series rectangular pulses of uniform concentration and duration applied with
  more or less regular frequency. (Long-term, continuous exposures could also be regarded as
  a series of episodes (day/night) because of the substantial influence of light on the plant's
  uptake and response to NOX [see Section 9.6.2.1].) A compilation of the results of
  experimental, long-term exposures with' respect to the occurrence of foliar symptoms is given
  in Table 9-3.
      These results are also summarized in Figure 9-9 with respect to the duration of exposure
  and the concentration of NOX employed.  That is, duration is expressed as the cumulative
  time during which NOX was present and not the total length of the experimental period;   '
 concentration is expressed  as that of NOX when present and not the arithmetic mean for the
 entire experimental period.  Also present in Figure 9-9 is a series of reference points
 representing 0.05 ppm as an annual mean and other maxima that  could be associated with it
 (cf. Chapter 8, U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency, 1982): 0.10 ppm for 876 h (two-fold
 the annual mean for 10% of the hours); 0.15 ppm for 87 h (three-fold the annual mean for
 1% of the hours); 0.25 ppm for 24 h; and 0.6 ppm (12-fold the annual mean) as a maximum
 one-hour concentration.
      With three exceptions, foliar injury was not produced by exposures in the
 concentration-duration plane area below this reference line.  Two  of these occurred with
 exposures to 0.10 ppm NO2: exposures for 4 hours per day for 35 days (total of 140 hours)
 produced chlorotic lesions on one-third of the clones of eastern white pine (Yang et al.,
 1982,1983a,b); exposures for 6 hours per day for 28 days (total of 168 hours) produced no
 injury to loblolly pine, Virginia pine, white ash, or willow oak but induced a  chlorosis on
 green ash and sweetgum (Kress and Skelly, 1982).  The third occurrence of injury was with
 increased leaf drop in bearing navel orange trees exposed to 0.0625, 0.125, or 0.25 ppm
 NO2 continuously for 8 months (Thompson et al., 1970).  The mass of leaves dropped tended
 to increase with the concentration of NO2 but neither the trend nor the effect of NO, at the
                                                                            £-1
August 1991
9-58      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  TABLE 9-3. COMPILATION OF OCCURRENCE OF FOLIAR SYMPTOMS IN
         LONG-TERM OR INTERMITTENT EXPOSURES TO NOX IN
                 EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS
NOX
ppm
0.02
0.02
0.037
0.05
0.0625
0.075
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.10
0.10
0.10 .
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.11
0.11
0.11
Exposure
Duration
24 h/day, 5 days
6 h/day, 14 days
24 h/day,
260 days
4 h/day, 35 days
24 h/day,
290 days
24 h/day,
260 days
3 h/day, 38 days
3 h/day, 40 days
3 h/day, 56 days
4 h/day, 35 days
6 h/day, 14 days
6 h/day, 28 days
24 h/day, 5 days
24 h/day, 6 days
24 h/day, 15 days
24 h/day, 19 days
24 h/day, 21 days
104 h/wk, 56 wk
3 h/day, 15 days,
1 every 2 days
24 h/day, 7 days
24 h/day, 14 days
104 h/wk, 8 wk
Effect (occurrence of foliar lesions)
No injury to bean (Srivastava and Ormrod, 1984)
No injury to bean (Srivastava and Ormrod, 1986)
Increased loss of foliage in navel orange (Thompson et al., 1971)
No injury to eastern white pine (Yang et al., 1982,1983b)
Increased leaf drop in navel orange (Thompson et al. , 1970)
Increased loss of foliage in navel orange (Thompson et al., 1971)
No injury to wheat (Runeckles and Palmer, 1987)
No injury to radish or bean (Runeckles and Palmer, 1987)
No injury to mint (Runeckles and Palmer, 1987)
Chlorotic lesions on one-third of the clones of eastern white pine (Yang et al.,
1982,1983a,b),
No injury to bean (Srivastava and Ormrod, 1986)
No injury to loblolly pine, Virginia pine, > white ash, willow oak; chlorosis on
green ash and sweetgum (Kress and Skelly, 1982)
No injury to bean (Srivastava and Ormrod, 1984)
No injury to pea (Wellburn et al., 1976)
No injury to potato, corn, pea, or tobacco (Elkiey et al. , 1988)
No injury to tomato (Capron and Mansfield, 1977)
No injury to tomato (Wellburn et al. , 1976) '
No injury to European white birch or downy birch (Wright, 1987)
No injury to soybean (Klarer et al. , 1984)
No injury to potato; intumescences developed on 1 of 4 cultivars (Petitte and
Ormrod, 1986)
No injury to tomato (Marie and Ormrod, 1984); no injury to potato (Petitte and
Ormrod, 1984) but yellowing of lower leaves in 1 of 2 cultivars of potato
(Petitte and Ormrod, 1988)
No injury to orchard grass or Kentucky bluegrass (Ashenden, 1979b)
August 1991
9-59
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
         TABLE 9-3 (cont'd).  COMPILATION OF OCCURRENCE OF FOLIAR
     SYMPTOMS IN LONG-TERM OR INTERMITTENT EXPOSURES TO NOX IN
                            EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS
 ppm
              Exposure
               Duration
 Effect (occurrence of foliar lesions)
 0.11      104 h/wk, 20 wk   No injury to timothy or Italian ryegrass (Ashenden and Williams, 1980); no
                           injury but darker green color on orchard grass and Kentucky bluegrass
                           (Ashenden,  1979b); no lesions on timothy, perennial ryegrass, or orchard grass;
                           frequently greener than controls (Wellburn et al., 1981)
 0.125     24 h/day, 290 days Increased leaf drop in navel orange (Thompson et al., 1970)
 0.15      24 h/day, 10 days  No injury (but darker green foliage) in red top, creeping bentgrass, colonial
                           bentgrass, red fescue, perennial ryegrass; lesions on 2 of 12 cultivars of
                           Kentucky bluegrass (Elkiey and Ormrod, 1980); moderate to no injury to
                           Kentucky bluegrass (Elkiey and Ormrod, 198 la)
 0.20      3 h/day,  15 days,   No injury to soybean (Klarer et al., 1984)
          1 every 2 days
 0.20      5 h/day, 2 days/wk,No lesions but premature senescence and defoliation in potato (Sinn and Pell,
          12 wk            1984)                                                         :
 0.20      5 h/day, 2 days/wk,No lesions but premature senescence and defoliation in potato (Sinn and Pell,
          16 wk            1984)
 0.20      4 h/day, 35 days   Injury to 2 of 3 clones of eastern white pine (Yang et al., 1983a)
 0.20      6 h/day, 10 days   Injury to Murray red gum (Elkiey and Ormrod, 1987)
 0.20      24 h/day, 6 days   No injury to pea (Wellburn et al., 1976)
 0.20      24 h/day, 14 days   No injury to corn or sunflower (Okano and Totsuka,  1985)
 0.20      24 h/day, 77 days   No injury (reduced senescence) on orchard grass and perennial ryegrass (Taylor
                            and Bell, 1988)
 0.21      24 h/day, 20 days   No injury to radish (Godzik et al., 1985)
 0.25      80 h              No injury to tomato (Troiano and Leone, 1977)
 0.25      3 h/day,           No injury to azalea (Sanders and Reinert, 1982a)
          6 days/4 wk
 0.25      9 h/day, 3 days     No injury to petunia (deCormis and Luttringer, 1977)
 0.25     24 h/day, 37 days   Epinasty and chlorosis in older leaves of tomato (Spierings, 1971)
 0.25     24 h/day, 63 days   No lesions on timothy, perennial ryegrass, or orchard grass; frequently greener
                           than controls (Wellburn et al., 1981)
0.25     24 h/day, 128 days  Loss of leaves in lower portion of the canopy of tomato (Spierings, 1971)
0.25     24 h/day, 290 days  Increased leaf drop in navel orange (Thompson et al., 1970)
0.30     3 h/day, 3 days,    No injury to radish (Sanders and Reinert, 1982b)
          1 apart
0.30     3 h/day, 3 days/wk.No injury to radish (Reinert and Sanders, 1982)
         3\vk
August 1991
9-60
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
        TABLE 9-3  (cont'd).  COMPILATION OF OCCURRENCE OF FOLIAR
    SYMPTOMS IN LONG-TERM OR INTERMITTENT EXPOSURES TO NOX IN
                           EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS
NOX
ppm
    Exposure
     Duration
                   Effect (occurrence of foliar lesions)
0,30
9-30

0.30

0.30

0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30

0.30
0.33

0.33

0.39
0.40

0.40
0.40
a0.40
"0.40
0.49
0.50

0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
4 h/day, 35 days   Injury to 2 of 3 clones of eastern white pine (Yang et al., 1983a)
6 h/day, 3 days,   No injury to marigold (Sanders and Reinert, 1982b)
1 apart
6 h/day, 3 days/wk,No injury to marigold (Reinert and Sanders, 1982)
3 wk
10 h/day, 14 days  No injury to sunflower, corn, bean, cucumber, tomato, or Swiss chard
                 (Yoneyamaetal., 1980c)
24 h/day, 7 days   Crinkling and darker green coloration on sunflower (Okano and Totsuka, 1986)
24 h/day, 9 days   Injury to buckwheat (Fujiwara, 1973; Ishikawa, 1976)
24 h/day, 19 days  Injury to tomato (Ishikawa, 1976)
24 h/day, 20 days  No injury to taro; injury to eggplant, (Ishikawa, 1976)
24 h/day, 27 days  No injury to soybean (Ishikawa,  1976)
24 h/day, 30 days  No injury or premature abscission on poplar hybrids, Japanese zelkova, shira
                 oak, sweet viburnum, camphor tree, or oleander (Okano et al., 1989)
24 h/day, 55 days  No injury to grape (Ishikawa,  1976)
5 h/day, 5 days/wk,No injury to creosote bush, desert willow, or brittle bush (Thompson et al.,
16 wk           1980)
5 h/day, 5 days/wk,No injury to creosote bush, saltbush, brittle bush or desert willow (Thompson
32 wk
 164 h
 2.8 h, 10 events
 in 2 mo
 6 h/day, 10 days
 9 h/day, 5 days
et al., 1980)
No injury to tomato (Troiano and Leone, 1977)
No symptoms or senescence on soybean (Irving et al.,  1982)
No injury to geranium (deCormis and Luttringer,  1977)
24 h/day, 21 days  No injury to tomato (Wellburn et al., 1976)
24 h/day, 35 days  Injury to tomato (Anderson and Mansfield, 1979)
9 h/day, 5 days    No injury to petunia, tomato, or geranium (deCormis and Luttringer, 1976)
6 h/day, 14 days   Injury present occasionally on bean, depended upon nitrate level supplied
                  (Srivastava and Ormrod, 1986)
9 h/day, 5 days    No injury to tomato (deCormis and Luttringer, 1977)
24 h/day, 3 days   No injury to Kentucky bluegrass (Elkiey and Ormrod, 198 Ib)
24 h/day, 5 days   Injury to bean (Srivastava and Ormrod, 1984)
24 h/day, 10 days  Epinasty in tomato (Spierings, 1971)
 August 1991
                                     9-61
                               DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
         TABLE 9-3 (cont'd).  COMPILATION OF OCCURRENCE OF FOLIAR
     SYMPTOMS IN LONG-TERM OR INTERMITTENT EXPOSURES TO NO  IN
                            EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS                 *
 NOX
 ppm
     Exposure
      Duration
Effect (occurrence of foliar lesions)
 0.50

 0.50
 0.50
 0.50
 0.50
 0.6
 0.6
 0.6
 *0.7
 *0.7
 "0.85
 «0.85
 •0.85
 e0.85
 C0.85
 «0.85
 "0.85
 "0.85
 1.0
 1.0
 •1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1,0

 1.0
 24 h/day, 13 days  No lesions to timothy, perennial ryegrass, or orchard grass; plants were
                  frequently greener than controls (Wellburn et al., 1981)
 24 h/day, 14 days  No injury to sunflower, radish, tomato, tobacco, cucumber, bean, corn, or
                  sorghum; darker green color in sunflower and radish (Okano et al., 1988); no
                  injury to corn and younger leaves of sunflower were crinkled and darker green
                  (Okano and Totsuka, 1985)
 24 h/day, 19 days  Injury to tomato (Capron and Mansfield, 1977)
 24 h/day, 21 days  No injury to tomato (Wellburn et al., 1976)
 24 h/day, 35 days  Chlorosis and heavy defoliation on citrus (Thompson et al., 1970)
 24 h/day, 35 days  No injury to turnip or lettuce (Ishikawa, 1976)
 24 h/day, 41 days  No injury to pimento or spinach (Ishikawa, 1976)
 24 h/day, 51 days  No injury to rice (Fujiwara, 1973; Ishikawa,  1976)
 24 h/day, 21 days  No injury to 4 cultivars of tomato (Mortensen, 1985b)
 24 h/day, 28 days  Injury to 3 of 4 cultivars of tomato (Mortensen, 1985b)
 24 h/day, 18 days  No injury to cucumber (Mortensen, 1985a)
 24 h/day, 22 days  No injury to tomato (Mortensen, 1985a)
 24 h/day, 35 days  No injury to chrysanthemum (Mortensen, 1985a)
 24 h/day, 43 days  No injury to rose or baby's tears (Mortensen, 1985a)
 24 h/day, 55 days  No injury to English ivy (Mortensen, 1985a)
 24 h/day, 77 days  No injury to English ivy or Boston fern (Mortensen, 1985a)
 24 h/day, 104 days  No injury to African violet (Mortensen, 1985a)
 24 h/day, 121 days  No injury to African violet (Mortensen, 1985a)
 27 h              Injury to endive (Zahn, 1975)
 10 h/day, 28 days  Injury to barley (Zahn, 1975)
 10 h/day, 139 days  No injury to English or Algerian ivy, rubber tree, benjamin tree, hibiscus,
                  Boston fern; scorching on Dieffenbachia (Saxe and Christensen, 1984,1985)
 537 h in 67 days,   No injury to European larch (Zahn, 1975)
 1 event/day
 639 h in 57 days,   Slight chlorosis on bean (Zahn, 1975)
 1 event/day
 1900 h in 161 days, No injury to Norway spruce (Zahn, 1975)
 1 event/day
24 h/day, 2 days    Slight injury to cotton, bean, and endive (Heck,  1964)
August 1991
                                     9-62
          DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
        TABLE 9-3 (cont'd).  COMPILATION OF OCCURRENCE OF FOLIAR
    SYMPTOMS IN LONG-TERM OR INTERMITTENT EXPOSURES TO NOX IN
                           EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS     .
NO*
ppm
       Exposure
        Duration
                   Effect (occurrence of foliar lesions)
1.0

1.0


1.0


1.0

1.0


1.0


1.0


1.0


1.2

"1.5

2.0


2.0

2.1


2.6

3.0

3.1

4.0

7.3

 12

 12

 12

 12
   24 h/day, 5 days   No injury to tomato (Bruggink et al., 1988)

   24 h/day, 6 days   No injury to pea (Wellburn et al., 1976); epinasty and darker green coloration"
                    were present on pea seedlings (Horsman and Wellburn, 1975)

   24 h/day, 14 days  No injury to corn or sunflower (Okano et al.,  1986); younger leaves of sunflower
                    were crinkled and darker green (Okano and Totsuka, 1985)

   24 h/day, 35 days  Chlorosis and heavy defoliation on navel orange (Thompson et al., 1970)

   5 h/day, 5 days/wk,No injury to alfilaria (Thompson et al.,  1980)
   12 wk
   5 h/day, 5 days/wk,No injury to Chaenactis carphoclina, saltbush or burro weed; injury to creosote
   16 wk            bush, desert willow, brittle bush (Thompson et al., 1980)

   5 h/day, 5 days/wk,No injury to scorpion weed (Thompson et al., 1980)
   17 wk
   5 h/day, 5 days/wk,No injury to burro weed; injury to brittle bush, creosote bush, desert willow,
   32 wk            saltbush (Thompson et al.,  1980)

   30 h

   24 h/day, 25 days
   24 h/day, 4 days   No injury to bean (Okano et al., 1984b); but darker green foliage in bean (Okano
                    et al., 1985a; Ito et al., 1984a,1985a)

   24 h/day, 7 days   No injury but darker green color in bean (Ito et al., 1985b)

   357 h in 51 days,  No injury to rose; slight chlorosis on carrot (Zahn, 1975)
   1 event/day
   24 h/day, 4 days

   8 h/day, 8 days

   9 h/day, 3 days

   24 h/day, 2 days

   7 h/day, 3 days

   3 h/day, 2 days

   3 h/day, 5 days

   3 h/day, 6 days

   3 h/day, 7 days
No injury to tobacco (Taylor and Eaton, 1966)

No injury to Japanese zelkova (Matsushima et al., 1977)

No injury to rape (day) (Zahn, 1975)

Injury to bean (Ito et al., 1984a,1985b)

Injury to rape (Zahn, 1975)

Injury to taro (Matsushima, 1977)

No injury to Citrus unshu (Matsushima, 1977)

No injury to ginkgo (Matsushima, 1977)

No injury to common camellia, Japanese aucuba, Japanese black pine, hinoki
cypress, fragrant olive (Matsushima, 1977)                	
 *NO.
 b20%
 C0.15
N02 + 80% NO.
ppm NO2  + 0.70 ppm NO.
                          d50% N02 + 50% NO.
                          °Mean for period.
 August 1991
                                         9-63
                                DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
          10
          1.0 .
a
a
u
c
o
•n
a

c
u

I
         0.1
         0.01-
                                    o     o
                                000
                                       0   0
                                       * 0    *    ^^J 0* *  * 0
                                                      00  0 0 0 0 00
                                                      0 *
                                                          000
                                       o   o* *   • * # *o  *
                                       o  *     o   o   o  *

                                              ft* *   °# 00°  0
                                       o   o o$     o
                                             GD 0
                                         0  0
                            10
                                       100
—I—
 1000
                          Ctmulative Duration of Exposure (fairs]
                                                                             —I
Figure 9-9.  Occurrence (*) or absence (o) of foliar injury from NO in long-term
            experimental exposures.
August 1991
                                  9-64       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      lowest concentration were judged to be statistically significant and a significant effect was
 2      found only when the effects of all three concentrations were pooled.
 3           The degree to which foliar injury can be used as a surrogate measure for other kinds of
 4      effects, such as reduced growth or yield, has been a persistent and still unresolved problem.
 5      The yield of fruit of navel orange (Thompson et al.,  1970,1971) or tomato (Spierings, 1971)
 6      and of tubers in potato (Sinn and Pell, 1984) appeared to be related to the degree of
 7      NO2-induced premature senescence and abscission of foliage.
 8
 9      9.4.2.  Loss in Growth and Yield
10           The effect of NOX on the growth, development, or reproduction of plants has occupied
11      the position of greatest practical and continuing concern in research.  Because these kinds of
12     effects have been studied primarily in the context of agriculture, they can include changes
13     that may occur in the quality and marketability as well as in the quantity of product.
14     Nevertheless, most of the information on productivity of commercial plants could be of
15     substantial relevance to an understanding  of effects in natural systems.
16           A compilation of the effects of exposures to NOX on the growth, development, or
17     reproduction of plants is provided in Appendix 9.B.   These results are organized with
 18     reference to general use and species of plant, concentration of NOX, conditions of exposure,
 19     nature of effect, and experimental methods.  The concentrations and durations of exposure
20     employed to produce these results are also summarized in Figure 9-10 with reference to what
21     could be considered an upper boundary of exposures consistent with some characteristics of
22     ambient exposures in the United States.
23           The latter illustrates a major problem in the evaluation of experimentally produced
 24      effects, namely,  the extent to which the characteristics of experimental exposures are
 25      comparable to those that are operationally significant in ambient situations.  For example,
 26      over the range of concentrations employed, those greater than 0.5 to 0.6 ppm for durations
 27      greater than one hour would not be consistent with one-hour maxima observed in ambient
 28      monitoring or with the ratios of one-hour maxima to annual mean (none greater than 14 and
 29      70% in the range of 5 to 8) in the United States (Chapter 8, U.S. Environmental Protection
 30     Agency,  1982).  Similarly, a mean concentration of greater than 0.2 ppm for a period of
 31      24 hours or more would not be consistent with ambient exposures.  Other order statistics
        August 1991
9_65      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
         100-
?
a
a
u

c
o
     11

     U



     8
           i _
         o.i -
         o.or
                  J  1*  V
                     t     +
                           10
                                     100
                                   Oiration (Hours]
                                                                   4  f
                                                        1000
Figure 9-10. Exposures employed in experimental investigations on the effect of NO

            growth and yield of plants.                                      s
                                                                       on
August 1991
                                 9-66     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     indicate that over the longer term, 90% of the monitored values were no greater than about
:2     twice the median and 99% were no greater than about three times the median concentration.
 3     Accordingly, long-term exposures employing constant concentrations continuously for one
 4     week to several months do not reflect the intermittent exposures expected in the United
•5     States.   Unlike the situation with single acute exposures, no formal expression has been
 6     offered for the relative effectiveness of a given concentration of NOX as a function of
 7     duration and frequency of exposure.
 8          A  summarization of experimental results that fall within or somewhat above the upper
 9     envelope of what would be consistent with ambient exposures in the United States is given  in
10     Table 9-4.  Some of the problems associated with determining the relationship between
11     effects on growth and yield and exposure to NOX can be illustrated with reference to two of
12     the most widely studied crops: tomato (Figure 9-11) and green bean (Figure 9-12).  In both
13     species, there is no clear demarcation between those exposures that result in reduced growth
14     and those that do not.  One reason for this is the intervention of biological factors and
15     environmental conditions (Section 9.5), which can determine whether growth is increased,
16     reduced, or affected at all.  Another reason is.that several measures of growth and yield
17     (depending upon the species of plant) have been used to study the effects of NOX: mass of
18     the plant; number  or mass of leaves, stems, roots, tubers, flowers, fruit, or seeds; foliar area;
19     and, length of stem or foliar elements.  Not all measures are affected equally or indeed in the
20     same way by an exposure to NOX in the same species (i.e., the growth of one organ can be
21     reduced while that of another can be increased).
22          Increased growth has  been noted in other species.  In rooted cuttings of European white
23     birch, NO2 at 0.04 ppm for 9 weeks significantly increased the mass of stem by 54%, mass
24     of leaves by 45%, stem height by 50%, and internode length by 38% (depending upon
25     photoperiod and light intensity) but had no  significant effect at 0.05 ppm for 4 weeks in
26     seedlings (Freer-Smith, 1985). In garden pea, NO2 at 0.039 ppm for 2 hours per day, 1 day
27     per week,  for 3 weeks or (Edelbauer and Maier, 1988)  or at 0.1 ppm for 15 days (EMey et
28     al., 1988)  had no  effect on growth; but at 0.12 ppm (2 h/day, 1 day/wk, 3 weeks) it
29     significantly increased the mass of plant by 20% and leaf area by 31 % after 3 weeks  of
30     exposure but not after 2 weeks (Edelbauer and Maier, 1988).
        August 1991
9-67
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
       TABLE 9-4.  SOME EFFECTS OF NOX ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF
     PLANTS  WITH RESPECT TO CONCENTRATIONS AND EXPOSURES USED IN
                             EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS
  ppm
      Exposure
       Duration
                                       Effect (occurrence of foliar lesions)
  0.018    to 187 days
  0.02
 0.025

 0.028
 0.03


 0.039

 0.04


 0.05

 0.05

 0.05
 5 days
                  No effect on mass of shoots but significantly increased mass of dead leaves and
                  decreased number of flowering shoots in perennial ryegrass; significantly
                  decreased mass of shoots by 131 days, and mass of dead leaves and number of
                  flowering shoots by 183 days in common timothy [NO2 at 0.006 + NO at
                  0.012 ppm] (Lane and Bell, 1984).

                  Increase in plant height and decrease in mass and area of leaf depended upon
                  level of nitrate supplied in 12-day-old green bean seedlings (Srivastava and
                  Ormrod, 1984).

                  Decreases in masses of shoot or root and increases  in number of nodules
                  depended upon level of nitrate in 23-day-old green bean seedlings (Srivastava and
                  Ormrod, 1986).

                  Significantly increased mass of shoots after 156 but not after 207 days of
                  exposure, and decreased number of flowering shoots after 207 days in perennial
                  ryegrass; significantly increased mass of shoot after 97 but not after 215 days of
                  exposure in common timothy; no effect on percent dead leaf mass or mass of
                  shoots after 153 days in orchard grass [control was NO2 at 0.009  ppm,
                  background SO2 at 0.003 ppm] (Lane and Bell, 1984).

7 h/day, 5 days/wk, Significantly increased the mass of seeds in 57-day-old green bean plants (Sandhu
3 wk              and Gupta,  1989).
  0.02     6 h/day, 14 days
 0.024    to 215 days
 to 187 days
 8wk
                 Significantly decreased the mass of shoots and number of flowering shoots but
                 increased the mass of dead leaves in perennial ryegrass; increased mass of shoots
                 by 131 days, decreased mass of dead leaves, but increased the number of
                 flowering shoots after 183 days in common timothy [NO2 at 0.021 + NO at
                 0.007 ppm] (Lane and Bell, 1984).

                 Did not significantly affect mass of plant but advanced bud-break in 6-month-old
                 seedlings of Sitka spruce exposed during dormancy (Freer-Smith and Mansfield
                 1987).
2 h/day, 1 day/wk, No effect on mass of plant or leaf area (added to continuous exposure of
3 wk             0.0094 ppm) of 5-week-old green pea plants (Edelbauer and Maier, 1988).
9 wk
                 Significantly increased mass and height of stem, mass of leaves, and internode
                 length (depending upon photoperiod and light intensity) in rooted cuttings of
                 European white birch (Freer-Smith, 1985).
7 h/day, 5 days/wk, Significantly increased masses of shoot, roots, and seeds in 57-day-old areen bean
3 wk             plants (Sandhu and Gupta, 1989).                                °

4 h/day, 35 days   No significant effect on length of needles in 2-year-old ramets of eastern white
                 pine (Yang et al.,  1983b).
4 wk
                          No significant effect on mass of roots, stem, or leaves in month-old seedlings of
                          European white birch (Freer-Smith, 1985).
August 1991
                                     9-68       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  TABLE 9-4 (cont'd).  SOME EFFECTS OF NOX ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD
 OF PLANTS WITH RESPECT TO CONCENTRATIONS AND EXPOSURES USED IN
                           EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS
NOX
ppm
    Exposure
     Duration
                    Effect (occurrence of foliar lesions)
0,08     3 h/day, 56 days
0.1


0.1


0.1


0.1



0.1
0.1


0.1



0.1

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
3 h every 2 days,
4 wk

7 h/day, 5 days
No effect on mass of plant or roots in rooted cuttings of mint or 38-day-old
wheat plants; increased mass of plant and hypocotyl in 40-day-old radish plants;
.increased mass of 40-day-old green bean plants (Runeckles and Palmer, 1987).

No effect on mass of leaves, stem, roots, or nodules or on number of nodules in
7-week-old soybean plants (Klarer et al., 1984).

No effect on relative growth rate of 5-week-old soybean plants (Sabaratnam and
Gupta, 1988).
7 h/day, 5 days/wk, Significantly increased masses of shoot and roots, numbers of pods and seeds,
3 wk

6 h/day, 14 days



6 h/day, 28 days
4 h/day, 35 days


.5 days



10 days

15 days
 19 days
20 days
 104 h/wk, 8 wk
and mass of seeds in green bean plants (Sandhu and Gupta, 1989).

Significantly decreased mass of shoot and roots but increased number of nodules
depending upon level of nitrate in 23-day-old green bean seedlings (Srivastava
and Ormrod, 1986).

No significant effect on height, mass of shoot, or mass of roots in 6- to
8-week-old  seedlings of pitch pine, Virginia pine, willow oak, or green ash;
decreased root mass in white ash and sweetgum; decreased height (depending on
clone) in loblolly pine (Kress and Skelly,  1982).  No significant effect on height
in 2- to 3-week-old seedlings of American sycamore (Kress et al., 1982).

Significantly reduced length and mass of needles, depending upon the clone, in
2-year-old ramets of eastern white pine (Yang et al.,  1983b).

Significantly increased plant height but decreased mass and area of leaf depending
upon level of nitrate in 12-day-old green bean seedlings (Srivastava and Ormrod,
1984).

No effect on growth in green bean or common sunflower (Totsuka et al., 1978).

No effect on mass of plant in garden pea, green bean, potato, or tobacco but
increased mass of plant and leaf area in maize seedlings (Elkiey et al., 1988);
changes in leaf area and masses of leaves, stem, roots, or of flowers and fruit
were of unstated significance in green bean and common sunflower (Totsuka et
al., 1978).

No effect on leaf area, mass of leaves, shoot, or roots in tomato plants (Capron
and Mansfield, 1977).

No effect on number of tillers or leaves, leaf area, or mass of leaves or roots in
barley seedlings (Pande and Mansfield, 1985).

Significantly reduced mass of plant (but not numbers of leaves or tillers),
depending upon cultivar, in Kentucky bluegrass seedlings (Whitmore and
Mansfield,  1983; Whitmore et al., 1982).  No effect on height of downy birch
(Wright,  1987).
August  1991
                                      9-69
                                DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
    TABLE 9-4 (cont'd).  SOME EFFECTS OF NOX ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD
  OF PLANTS WITH RESPECT TO CONCENTRATIONS AND EXPOSURES USED IN
                            EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS
 NO,
 ppm
     Exposure
     Duration
                    Effect (occurrence of foliar lesions)
 0.1
 0.1
 0.1



 0.1


 0.1
 0.11


 0.11


 0.11


 0.11


 0.11


 0.11
 104 h/wk, 21 wk

 104 h/wk, 22 wk
 104 h/wk, 28 wk



 104 h/wk, 33 wfc


 104 h/wk, 60 wk
7 or 14 days


4 wk


5h/day,
5 days/wk, 12 wk

5 h/day,
5 days/wk, 17 wk

5 h/day, ..
5 days/wk, 16 wk

5 h/day,
5 days/wk, 32 wk
 No effect on mass of Kentucky bluegrass seedlings exposed from emergence
 (Whitmore and Mansfield, 1983; Whitmore et al., 1982).

 No significant effect on stem height, leaf area, or mass of shoot in second-year
 cuttings of black poplar, downy birch, or common apple; increased stem height
 in European white birch and white alder and leaf area and mass of shoot in
 small-leaved European linden (Freer-Smith, 1984; Whitmore and Freer-Smith,
 1982).                                                     ,

 No effect on orchard grass; significantly decreased mass of shoot—depending
 upon cultivar  and stage of development in common timothy, perennial ryegrass
 (Whitmore and Mansfield, 1983) and Kentucky bluegrass (Whitmore and
 Mansfield, 1983; Whitmore et al., 1982).

 Significantly reduced mass of shoot and number of culms in Kentucky bluegrass
 grown as swards (Whitmore and Mansfield, 1983; Whitmore et al., 1982).

 No significant effect on stem height or mass of shoot in second-year,cuttings of
 black poplar, downy birch, common apple, or small-leaved European linden;
 increased mass of shoot in European white birch; increased stem height and mass
 of shoot in white alder (Freer-Smith, 1984; Whitmore and Freer-Smith,  1982).
 No effect on height, stem diameter, and mass of shoot or roots in European
 white birch or downy birch (Wright, 1987).

 No effect on leaf area or mass of leaves, stem, or roots in 20- or 24-day-old
 potato plants from sprouts or rooted cuttings (Petitte and Ormrod,  1984,1988).

 No effect on leaf area or mass of leaves, stem, or roots in tomato plants (Marie
 and Ormrod, 1984). ,

 No effect on height or mass of plant or on number of inflorescences in
 Chaenactis carphodina (Thompson et al., 1980).

 No significant effect on height or mass of plant or on number of inflorescences
 in alfilaria, desert marigold, scorpion weed; or, on mass of plant in Plantago
 insularis (Thompson et al., 1980).

No significant effect on linear growth or mass of shoot in brittle bush, burro
weed, creosote bush, or desert willow; linear growth was not affected but mass
of shoot was increased in four-wing saltbush (Thompson et al., 1980).

No significant effect on linear growth or mass of shoot in brittle bush, burro
weed, creosote bush, desert willow,-or four-wing saltbush; reduced mass of seed
in burro weed  and mumber of inflorescences in brittle bush  (Thompson et al.,
 1980).                                ,
August 1991
                                    9-70
                              DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  TABLE 0-4 (cont'd).  SOME EFFECTS OF NOX ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD
 OF PLANTS WITH RESPECT TO CONCENTRATIONS AND EXPOSURES USED IN
                           EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS
NOX
ppm
    Exposure
     Duration
                     Effect (occurrence of foliar lesions)
0.11     104 h/wk, 4wk
0.11
104h/wk, 8wk'
0.11


0.11
104 h/wk, 10 wk
104,h/wk, 12 wk
0.11
104 h/wk, 16 wk
0.11
104 h/wk, 20 wk
0.11

0,12
104 h/wk, 22 wk
 No effect on mass of green leaves, of dead leaves and stubble, or of roots, leaf
 area, number of leaves or of tillers in common timothy, Italian ryegrass,
 (Ashenden and Williams, 1980; Ashenden and Mansfield, 1978) or in orchard
 grass (Ashenden, 1979b); mass .of roots reduced in, Kentucky bluegrass
 (Ashenden, 1979b),

 No effect on mass of green leaves, of dead leaves and stubble, or of roots, leaf
 area, number of leaves or of tillers hi common timothy, Italian ryegrass
 (Ashenden and Williams, 1980; Ashenden and Mansfield, 1978); decreased mass
 of green leaves and leaf area in orchard grass, and decreased mass of green
 leaves, of dead leaves and stubble, or of roots, leaf area, and number of leaves in
 Kentucky bluegrass (Ashenden, 1979b). No effect on growth in mass of leaves,
 stem, or roots, but significantly decreased number of leaves ;and increased area
 per leaf in one-year black poplar cuttings (Freer-Smith, 1984; Whitmofe et al.,
 1982).

 No effect on mass of leaves, stem; or roots in black poplar during winter
 (Freer-Smith, 1984; Whitmoreet all, 1982).

 Significantly decreased mass of green leaves in orchard grass (Ashenden, 1979),
 mass of dead leaves and stubble and of roots in Italian ryegrass (Ashenden and
 Williams, 1980; Ashenden and Mansfield, 1978), mass of roots in common
 timothy (Ashenden and Williams, 1980; Ashenden and Mansfield, 1978),  and
 mass of green leaves, dead leaves and stubble, 'and roots and of leaf area and
 number of leaves in Kentucky ryegrass (Ashenden,  1979).

 No effect on mass of green leaves, of dead leaves and stubble, or of roots, leaf
 area, and number of leaves or tillers in orchard grass (Ashenden, 1979) or in
 Italian ryegrass (Ashenden and Williams, 1980; Ashenden and Mansfield, 1978);
 significantly decreased mass of .roots in common timothy (Ashenden and
 Williams, 1980; Ashenden and Mansfield, 1978) and mass of green leaves, dead
 leaves and stubble, of roots, and of leaf area in Kentucky bluegrass (Ashenden,
,1979).                      ,      .

 No effect on mass of green leaves, of dead leaves and stubble, or of roots, leaf
 area, number of leaves or of tillers in common timothy or Italian ryegrass
 (Ashenden and Williams, 1980; Ashenden and Mansfield, 1978). Significantly
 decreased mass of dead leaves  and stubble in orchard grass (Ashenden, 1979) also
 mass of green leaves, of dead leaves and stubble, and of roots in Kentucky
 bluegrass (Ashenden, 1979).

 No effect on growth in mass of stem or roots in one-year black poplar cuttings
 (Freer-Smith, 1984; Whitmore et al., 1982).
2 h/day, 1 day/wk,  Significantly increased mass of plant and leaf area after 3 weeks but no effect
3 wk              after 2 weeks in garden pea (added to continuous exposure of 0.029 ppm)
                  (Edelbauer and Maier, 1988).
August
                                     9-71
                                 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  TABLE 9-4 (cont'd).  SOME EFFECTS OF NOX ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD
OF PLANTS WITH RESPECT TO CONCENTRATIONS AND EXPOSURES USED IN
                        EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS
NOX
ppm
Exposure
Duration
Effect (occurrence of foliar lesions)
0.15     10 days
0.16     to 22 days
           No effect on area of 3rd youngest leaf of 48-day-old plants (at start) in redtop,
           creeping bentgrass, colonial bentgrass, red fescue, or perennial ryegrass;
           significant reduction in 1 out of 12 cultivars of Kentucky bluegrass (Elkiey and
           Ormrod, 1980).  No effect on fresh mass but both decreased and increased leaf
           area in Kentucky bluegrass depending upon cultivar and environmental conditions
           (Elkiey and Ormrod, 1981).

           Significantly decreased mass of leaf after 10 days and both mass and area of leaf
           after 22 days in tomato (Taylor and Eaton,  1966).
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.25
0.3
3or6h
7 h/day, 5 days
3 h/day,
once/2 days, 4 wk
14 days
38 days
50 days
60-67 days
11 wk
No effect on mass of leaves or root in radish plants (Reinert and Gray, 1981).
No effect on relative growth rate of 5-week-old soybean plants (Sabaratnam and
Gupta, 1988).
No effect on mass of leaves, stem, roots, or nodules or on number of nodules in
7-week-old soybean plants (Klarer et al., 1984).
Significantly decreased leaf area but did not affect mass of leaves, stem, or roots
in 28-day-old sunflower plants; no effect in maize (Okano et al., 1985a).
No effect on leaf area (+11) in common sunflower (Natori and Totsuka, 1980).
Significantly increased mass of plant and leaf area depending on fertilizer in soil
in tomato [NO] (Anderson and Mansfield, 1979).
No effect on leaf area in tomato or cucumber (Natori and Totsuka, , 1980).
Significantly increased mass of roots and shoots and number of tillers in two
populations of perennial ryegrass (Taylor and Bell, 1988).
5 h/day, 2 days/wk, Significantly decreased number and mass of tubers and accelerated senescence and
12-16 wk abscission of foliage in potato (Sinn and Pell, 1984).
Ih
1 h/day, 15 days
20 days
3 h/day, 6 days in
4 wk
7 h/day, 5 days
No effect on, leaf area, height, or fresh mass of leaves or stems in tomato
(Goodyear and Ormrod, 1988).
No effect on mass of plant in green bean or tobacco (Elkiey et al., 1988).
No effect on mass of leaves or root (0 to +20)in six cultivars of radish (Godzik
et al., 1985).
Significantly decreased masses of stems and leaves and length of shoot in 2 out of
8 cultivars of 1-year-old azalea plants (Sanders and Reinert, 1982b).
No effect on relative growth rate of 5-week-old soybean plants (Sabaratnam and
Gupta, 1988).
August 1991
                             9-72
          DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  TABLE 9-4 (cont'd).  SOME EFFECTS OF NOX ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD
OF PLANTS WITH RESPECT TO CONCENTRATIONS AND EXPOSURES USED IN
                          EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS
NOX
ppm
    Exposure
     Duration
                                    Effect (occurrence of foliar lesions)
0.3
0.3
0.37


0,4


0.4


0.5



0.5


0.5


0.5
3 h/day, 3 days in
1 wk

6 h/day, 3 days in
Iwk      -

3 h/day, 9 days in
4 wk

6 h/day, 9 days in
4 wk
                 No effect in 30-day-old radish plants (Sanders and Reinejrt, 1982a).


                 No effect on masses of shoot or flowers but significantly increased mass of roots
                 in 58-day-old French marigold plants (Sanders and Reinert, 1982a).

                 No effect in 30-day-old radish plants (Reinert and Sanders, 1982).


                 No effect in 58-day-old French marigold plants (Reinert and Sanders, 1982).
10 h/day, 14 days  Significantly decreased leaf area and mass of leaf sheath in maize; had no effect
                 on leaf area or mass of leaf, stem, or roots in tomato or Swiss chard; but,
                 significantly increased the leaf area and mass of leaves, stem, and roots in
                 cucumber, the leaf area and mass of leaves and stem in common sunflower, and
                 the leaf area and masses of stem and roots in green bean (Yoneyama et al.,
                 1980).

                 No effect on yield of soybean plants grown in field plots (Irving et al., 1982).
2.5 h/event,
10 events

3.or6h
2.9 h/event,
10 events

Ih  '
7h
No effect on mass of leaves or root in 25-day-old radish plants (Reinert and
Gray, 1981).


No effect on yield of soybean plants grown in field plots (Irving et al.,  1982).


No effect on height or number of leaves but significantly increased leaf area,
mass of leaves, and mass of stem in rooted cuttings of black poplar; significantly
increased leaf area in Carolina poplar (Eastham and Ormrod, 1986).

Significantly decreased number of pods and seeds and mass of seeds in soybean
(Gupta and Sabaratnam, 1988).
7 h/day, 5 days    Significantly decreased relative growth rate of 5-week-old soybean plants
                 (Sabaratnam and Gupta, 1988).

6 h/day, 14 days   Significantly decreased mass of shoot and roots but increased or decreased
                 number of nodules depending upon level of nitrate in 23-day-old green bean
                 seedlings (Srivastava and Ormrod, 1986).
August 1991  .
                                     9-73      ', DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Ton CPPmD
t-t
i- O
! .... 1
id
i
C
u
0 0.1 .
o.oi -

0
0 + -
o : o±
a
OQO
to
o o Oo o
i
. I 1
10 100 1000




Cumulative Duration of Exposure C-toirs]
Figure 9-11. Experimental exposures to NOX resulting in the occurrence of increased
            (+), decreased (-), or unaffected (o) growth or yigld in tomato.
August 1991
9-74      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
10 -

n 1 .
E
a
a
u
c
0
v.

c
a;
u
c
8 o.i -

o m
\J m \J i •


0 0





i


0




i + + 00
i i



















10 100 ' 'lOOQ
Cumulative Duration of Exposure Choirs)
Figure 9-12. Experimental exposures to NOX resulting in increased (+), decreased (-),
            or unaffected (o) growth or yield in green bean.
August 1991
9-75      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1          In several species, stimulations of growth occurred at lower concentrations of NCL than
                                                                                       A.
  2     did inhibitions. For example, a one-hour exposure to NO2 at 0.5 ppm produced a
  3     significantly increased leaf area, mass of leaves, and mass of stem in rooted cuttings of black
  4     poplar and increased leaf area in Carolina poplar,  whereas NO2 at 1.0 ppm produced a
  5     significantly decreased mass of stem in black poplar and a decreased height in Carolina
  6     poplar (Eastham and Ormrod, 1986). In radish, exposure to NO2 at 0.08 ppm, for 3 hours
  7     per day  for 40 days, produced substantial increases in mass of plant (93%) and  hypocotyl
  8     (215%)  (Runeckles and Palmer, 1987), whereas continuous or intermittent exposures ranging
  9     from several hours to 3 weeks to NO2 in the range in 0.2 to 0.4 ppm had no significant
 10     effect on growth of leaves or root (Reinert and Gray,  1981; Godzik et al., 1985; Sanders and
 11     Reinert, 1982a; Reinert and Sanders, 1982), and reductions in mass of plant (33%) and leaf
 12     area (29%)  occurred with a continuous exposure to NO2 at 0.5 ppm for 14 days (Okano
 13     et al., 1988).  Similarly with cucumber, exposures to NO2 at 0.2 ppm (Natori and Totsuka,
 14     1980) or 0.3 ppm increased leaf area and the masses of leaves, stems, and roots (Yoneyama
 15     et al., 1980), whereas exposure to NO2 at 0.5  ppm for 14 days decreased the mass of plant
 16     and the leaf-weight ratio (Okano et al., 1988).
 17          Because the exposure-effect relationship for growth is not monotonic, it is difficult to
 18     determine whether an exposure that produces no effect is one below the  threshold  for any
 19     effect at all or is in the range of exposures between those that  increase growth and those that
20     decrease it.
21          In  some studies, measures of growth are evaluated once,  at maturity or some other
22     defined time.  In others, changes in these variables over time have been  used to determine the
23     effects of NOX not only on rate of growth but also on certain stages of vegetative or
24     reproductive development.  Consequently, another problem in  the interpretation  of
25     experimentally produced effects is the relationship of changes occurring  in young plants or
26     with short-term exposures to those effects on growth and yield that would eventually be
27     manifest in mature plants or with long-term exposures.
28         When potato plants were subjected to NO2 at 0.2 ppm for 5 hours  per day, 2 days per
29     week, for 12 to 16 weeks in field exposure chambers,  both the number and mass of tubers
30     were reduced (by up to 38% and 51%,  respectively, depending on cultivar),  and reductions in
31      yield were associated with an accelerated  senescence and abscission of foliage (Sinn and Pell,
       August 1991
9-76
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      1984).  Shorter-term (for 7, 14, or 15 days) exposures to lower concentrations (0.10 or
 2      0.11 ppm NO^ had no effect on the growth of younger ( 20-, 24- or 30-day-old) plants
 3      (Petitte and Ormrod, 1984,1988; Elkieyetal., 1988).
 4          There was no significant effect on yield of soybeans grown in field plots and exposed
 5      (by a zonal air pollution system) 10 times during the growing season to concentrations of
 6      NO2 ranging from 0.12 to 0.37 ppm for an average of 2.5 hours per event in one year or
 7      concentrations from 0.07 to 0.4 ppm for an average of 2.9 hours per event in another year
 8      (Irving et al., 1982).  No significant effect on the growth of 7-week-old soybean plants
 9      occurred in exposures of 3 hours per day, once every 2 days, for 15 events to NO2 at 0.1 or
10      0.2 ppm although the number of nodules was decreased by 4% at the lower concentration and
11      by 15% at the higher  (Klarer et al., 1984).  The absence of effects on growth at NO2 at or
12      less than 0.4 ppm is consistent with the lack of an effect on the relative growth rate of
13      5-week-old soybean plants by exposures of 7 hours per day for 5 days at concentrations less
14      than or equal to 0.3 ppm and a reduction when the concentration was 0.5 ppm (Sabaratnam
15      and Gupta, 1988).  However, a single exposure to 0.5 ppm for 7 hours, when plants were
16      one month old, was reported to decrease yield of pods and seeds when plants were harvested
17      80 days later (Gupta and Sabaratnam,  1988).
18          Two series of long-term,  continuous exposures with bearing Navel orange trees utilized
19      the addition of NO2 to charcoal-filtered ambient air.  No significant effects of NO2 with an
20      8-month exposure (May through December) were found with respect to number or mass of
21      fruit per tree when  levels were one- or two-times that of ambient (based upon hourly means
22      of the preceding day)  in the Los Angeles Basin (range of 0 to 0.18 ppm) (Thompson et al.,
23      1971).  With a series  of defined levels (1.0, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, or 0.0625 ppm) for 290 days,
24      the number and mass  of fruit per tree were significantly reduced by more than 70% at the
25      two highest concentrations. Although yield of trees subjected to the lowest concentration of
26      NO2 was not significantly different from those receiving filtered air, pooled values for the
27      three lower concentrations gave a significant reduction in number of fruit of 51 % and mass of
28      fruit of 45% (Thompson etal.,  1970).
29          Five species each of desert annuals and shrubs were subjected to  intermittent exposures
30      (5 hours/day for 5 days/week) to NO2 at 0.11, 0.33, or 1.0 ppm under greenhouse conditions
31      for periods ranging from 9 to 32 weeks (depending upon species).  At the lowest
        August 1991
9-77
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 concentration of NO2, there was no significant effect on height or mass of plant or on
 number of inflorescences in Chaenactis carphodina after 12 weeks, on mass of plant in
 Plantago insularis after 17 weeks, nor on height or mass of plant or number of inflorescences
 in alfilaria, desert marigold, or scorpion weed after 17 weeks.  With exposures of 16 weeks,
 there was no significant effect on linear growth or mass of shoot in brittle bush, burro weed,
 creosote bush, or desert willow, and linear growth was not affected but mass of shoot was
 increased in four-wing saltbush. With exposures of 32 weeks, there was no significant effect
 on linear growth or mass of shoot in brittle bush, burro weed, creosote bush, desert willow,
 or four-wing saltbush, but there was a reduction in the mass of seed in burro weed and the
 number of inflorescences in brittle bush (Thompson et al., 1980).
     A general form for the relationship between exposure to NOX and an effect on growth
 or yield is suggested by common features  of many studies,  and it would have the following
 characteristics: (1) a threshold exposure that must be exceeded for an effect (i.e., a deviation
 from the unexposed state) to occur; (2) an increase in growth or yield at exposures above the
 threshold but below those that produce a decrease; (3) an increasingly greater reduction in
 growth or yield with increasing concentration of NOX or duration or frequency of exposure
 (greater than those that produce an increase in growth)  yielding a nonmonotonic but unimodal
 relationship; (4) within the same species, the exposure-effect relationship can be different for
 reproductive and vegetative development and it can vary among different organs of the same
 plant (e.g.,  an effect on the growth of roots could occur at  a lesser or greater exposure than
 what would produce the same degree of effect in the growth of stems or leaves).
     Experimental investigations have not provided a clear  demarcation between exposures to
 NOX that adversely affect the growth, development, or  reproduction of plants and those that
 do not. Nevertheless, single exposures of 24 hours or less that could produce adverse effects
are at concentrations of NO2 greater than what have been shown to occur in ambient
exposures in the United States.  In periods of two weeks or greater duration with intermittent
exposures of several hours per day, adverse effects on growth or yield start to appear when
the concentration of NOX reaches the range of 0.1 to 0.5 ppm depending upon the species of
plant, nature of effect, and conditions of exposure.
        August 1991
                                         9-78
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     9.5  FACTORS AFFECTING PLANT RESPONSE TO NOX
 2     9,5.1  Characteristics of the Plant
 3          Those characteristics of a plant that are known to affect its response to NOX can be
 4     arranged into three general categories:  (1) genetic, which includes species, race, cultivar, or
 5     clone;  (2) phenologic, such as the stage of development of a plant or temporal changes in the
 6     states of its organs;  (3) phenotypic, which  results from the interaction of the inherent genetic
 7 ,    factors of the plant with the conditions of its environment.  (The last category will be
 8     considered in a discussion of the influence of environmental conditions,  Section 9.5.2.)
 9
10     9.5.1.1.  Species of Plant                                               ,   '    .
11          More than 250 species have been used in investigations of NOX (Appendix 9. A).  The
12     bulk of research has been devoted to  herbaceous species, and most of these represent plants
13     that are grown commercially.  The woody species preponderantly represent trees and shrubs
14     that both are cultivated as ornamentals and occur as components of natural plant communities
15     in temperate climatic zones.  Species of plant determines the exposure-response relationship
16  ,   in several ways.
17          First, species determines sensitivity (or tolerance) to NOX and thereby the magnitude of
18     the effect or risk associated with a given exposure. Variations in sensitivity to NOX occur
19     among the species of plants, and the  results of several comparative studies (Czech and
20     Nothdurft, 1952; Benedict and Breen, 1955; MacLean et al., 1968; van Haut and Stratmann,
21      1967)  have been compiled with species placed in the three general categories of high,
22  .   moderate, or low sensitivity (National Research Council, 1977).  More  recent studies  have
23     provided additional information on certain commercial plants (Taylor et al., 1975;
24     Matsushima, 1977), desert species (Thompson et al., 1980),  and  several species of
25     ornamental, greenhouse crops with reference to their sensitivity to NO2-induced effects on
26     commercial value (Mortensen, 1985a; Saxe, 1986a; Saxe and Christensen, 1985).  The
27     results of several of these studies are summarized in Table 9-5.
28   .  „    Classifications of different species according to their sensitivity have relied on two
29      operationally distinct methods.  One measured relative sensitivity as the magnitude of
30      exposure required to achieve a certain effect (Czech and Nothdurft, 1952; van Haut and
31      Stratmann, 1967).  The other used the degree of effect produced  by a certain exposure
        August 1991
9-79
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   TABLE 9-5.  RELATIVE SENSITIVITIES OF PLANTS TO NITROGEN DIOXIDE51
  Sensitive
 Intermediate
                                                                Tolerant
 European larch
 European white birch
             Conifers
 Colorado blue spruce
 Nikkofir
 White fir
 White spruce
        Trees and shrubs
 Japanese maple
 Japanese zelkova
 Little-leaf linden
 Norway maple
Austrian pine
English yew
Hinoki cypress
Japanese black pine
Loblolly pine
Pitch pine
Virginia pine
Beech
Black locust
Black poplar
Elder
English oak
European hornbeam
Ginkgo (Maidenhair tree)
Green ash
Scotch elm
Sweetgum
White ash
White oak
 Alfalfa (lucerne)
 Barley
 Oats
 Red clover
 Spring clover
 Spring vetch
 Tobacco
      Field crops and grasses
Annual bluegrass
Potato
Rye
Sweet corn
Wheat
Kentucky bluegrass
 Apple (wild)
 Pear (wild)
      Fruit trees and shrubs
Crabapple
Grapefruit
Japanese pear
Orange
Tangelo
                                         Garden crops
Cartotb
Celery11
Leek
Lettuce
Parsley
Pea
Pinto bean
Rhubarb
Bush beanb
Celeryb
Tomato





Asparagus
Bush beanb
Cabbage
Carrotb
Kohlrabi
Onion


August 1991
             9-80       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
           TABLE 9-5 (cont'd).  RELATIVE SENSITIVITIES OF PLANTS TO NITROGEN
                                                DIOXH>Ea
       Sensitive
Intermediate
       Tolerant
       Azalea
       Bougainvillea
       Chinese hibiscus
       Common petunia
       Oleander
       Pyracantha
       Roseb
       Snapdragon
       Sweet pea
       Tuberous begonia
  Ornamental shrubs and flowers
Cape jasmine  .
Catawba rhododendron
Common zinnia
Dahlia
Flossflower
Fuchsia
Gardenia
Ixora
Japanese pittosporum
Ligustrum
Oleander
Paperbark tree
Petunia
       Carissa
       Croton
       Daisy
       Gladiolus
       Japanese morning glory
       Lily-of-the-valley
       Plantain lily
       Roseb
       Shore juniper
       Spring heath
       Common plantain
       Common mugwort
       Horseweed
       Mustard
       Sunflower
            Weeds
Cheeseweed
Chickweed
Common chickweed
Dandelion
       J-^imb's-quarters
       Nettle-leaved goosefoot
       Pigweed
       Red root
       Creosote bush
         Desert species
Brittle bush
Desert willow
       Alfilaria
       Burro weed
       Chaenactis (CN)
       Desert marigold
       Four-wing saltbush
       Scorpion weed
       "Compiled from Benedict and Breen, 1955; Czech and Northdurft, 1952; Kress and Skelly,
        1982; MacLean et al., 1968; Matsusbima, 1977; Taylor and MacLean, 1970; Thompson
        et al., 1980; van Haut and Stratmann,  1967.
       bDifferent investigators reported different susceptibilities.
1      (Benedict and Breen, 1955;  Kress and Skelly,  1982; Mortensen, 1985a).  A combination of
2      both methods was also used (MacLean et al., 1968; Thompson et al., 1980; Taylor et al.,
3      1975; Zahn, 1975; Matsushima,  1977).  All such classifications are subject to the caveat that
4      relative sensitivity depends upon  stage of development, environmental conditions, and kind of
5      effect that is observed (van Haut and Stratmann, 1967).
       August 1991
             9-81
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1          Some interspecific differences in response have been associated with differences in the
  2     uptake of NOX (see Sections 9.3.1 and 9.6) which in turn have been investigated in relation
  3     to other characteristics, such as growth rate, stomatal density, or unit of effective leaf area
  4     (Okano et al., 1988).  Nevertheless, the inherent factors determining response are numerous
  5     and complex, and no single factor or set of them has yet been advanced to provide a
  6     consistent explanation of interspecific differences.
  7          It has been shown that the kind and magnitude of the effect of NOX depends upon the
  8     processes (e.g., growth or reproduction) and organ (e.g., leaves, stems, or roots) considered
  9     (see Section 9.5.2 and Appendix 9-A). Consequently, a second way in which species enters
 10     into the exposure-response relationship is that it determines the function of the plant and
 11     thereby which of the various effects that may be produced by NOX will be of greatest
 12     practical  significance.  For example, the effect of paramount importance would be yield of
 13     seed in cereals, fruit in tomato, tubers in potato,  appearance and rate of development in
 14     floricultural crops, and wood volume in forest trees. It has also been shown that species (as
 15     well as other taxa) can determine the kind of foliar symptom that is produced by exposure to
 16     NOX (Section 9.4.1).
 17          To the extent that species governs the type of life cycle followed by the plant in the
 18     habitat it occupies, species may also determine what temporal characteristics of exposure and
 19     what sets and ranges of environmental conditions should be considered in estimations or
20     predictions of the plant's response to NOX.
21
22     9.5.1.2.  Intraspecific Variation
23          Differences among cultivars, races, families, or clones within several species have
24     demonstrated that intraspecific variation in sensitivity to NOX can occur (Table 9-6).
25     However, no analyses have been made of the genetic factors that may determine it in crops
26     nor of the statistics that could describe its distribution in natural populations.
27          Some intraspecific differences in response have been determined over a range of
28     exposures to NOX,  thereby allowing quantitative estimates to be made as to the influence of
29     this factor on dose-response relationships. In a concentration-duration factorial design,
30     statistics for the dose-response function for foliar  injury yielded about a 48% difference in the
31      threshold dose for one hour between cultivars  of oat and about a 40%  difference between
       August 1991
9-82
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
        TABLE 9-6.  INTRASPECEBTC DIFFERENCES IN THE RESPONSES OF
	    PLANTS TO NITROGEN OXIDES

 Tomato:                            ,

 Exposure to NO at 0.4 ppm increased growth in two cultivars ('Sonato' and 'Eurocross BBf, and to a
      greater degree in the former) and decreased growth in two others ('Extase' and 'Adagio', and to a
      greater degree in the latter) (Anderson & Mansfield, 1979).

 Two cultivars ('Ailsa Craig' and 'Sonato') differed in response to NO-induced increases in the level of
      nitrate reductase in leaves (Wellburn et al., 1980).

 Two cultivars ('Ailsa Craig' and 'Eurocross BB') differed with respect to effects of exposure to NO or
      to NO2 at 1.5 ppm on the levels of nitrate or nitrite reductase in leaves and content of nitrate or
      amines (Murray & Wellburn, 1985).

 Eight cultivars were compared in ah exposure to NOX at 0.7 ppm in enriched (1000 ppm) CO2: foliar
      lesions and the greatest reductions in growth occurred in three cultivars ('Rianto','Dombito', and
      'Virosa'); significant reductions in growth occurred in three other cultivars ('Marathon', 'Abunda',
      and 'Ida'); and, no effects on growth were produced in two cultivars ('Sonatine' and 'Dombello')
      (Mortensen, 1985b).


 Potato:                              ;

 Two cultivars ('Kennebec' and 'Atlantic') were exposed to NO2 at 0.2 ppm but there were no
      differences between them in rate of senescence of leaves or in reductions in number or mass of
      tubers (Sinn & Pell,  1984).

 Four cultivars ('Superior', 'Norchip', 'Kennebec', and 'Russet Burbank') were exposed to NO2 at
      0.11 ppm; stem fresh weight was reduced in 'Kennebec' and it was postulated that varietal
      differences in response may be related to maturity class (Petitte & Ormrod, 1984). When
      'Kennebec' and 'Russet  Burbank' were exposed to NO2 at 0.11 ppm as rooted cuttings, fresh mass
      of roots was decreased in 'Kennebec'  (Petitte & Ormrod, 1988). NO2-induced intumescences of the
      leaf occurred in 'Kennebec' and 'Russet Burbank' but not in the other two cultivars (Petitte &
      Ormrod, 1986).
 Activity of nitrate reductase in leaves of two cultivars ('Bell Boy' and 'Rumba') was not affected by
      exposure to NO2 at 1.5 ppm but activity of nitrite reductase was reduced in 'Bell Boy'; this cultivar
      also had a greater increase in content of amines in foliage (Murray & Wellburn, 1985).


 Radish:

 Six cultivars were exposed to NO2 but no conclusions are possible as to the influence of genetic
      factors because no foliar lesions were produced and there was no effect on dry mass of leaves or
      roots (Godzik et al., 1985).
 Six cultivars were exposed to NO2 but no conclusions are possible as to the influence of genetic
      factors because there was no effect on dry mass of leaves or growth rate (Mortensen, 1985b).
August 1991
9-83
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  TABLE 9-6 (cont'd). INTRASPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN THE RESPONSES OF
 	PLANTS TO NITROGEN OXIDES	

  Barley;

  There was a significant association between increased mass of straw and ambient NO2 in two cultivars
      ('Aramir' and 'Claret') but not in two others ('Dram' and 'Golden Promise'); a significant
      association between increased number of tillers and NO2 occurred with 'Golden Promise' but not
      with the other cultivars (Ashmore et al.,  1988).

  The degree to which exposure to NO2 at 0.3 ppm altered the level of nitrate reductase varied among
      mutants deficient in the enzyme; genotype did not affect uptake of NO2 (Rowland-Bamford et al.,
      1989).
 Three cultivars ('Clintland 64', '329-80', and 'Pendek') were classified as susceptible to NO2-induced
      foliar injury in a concentration-duration factorial design; based on statistics for the dose-response
      function, about a 48% difference in threshold dose for one hour was the range (Heck & Tingey,
      1979).


 Corn:

 Both cultivars ('Pioneer 509-W and 'Golden Cross') were judged tolerant to NO2-induced foliar injury
      (Heck & Tingey, 1979).
 In a concentration times duration factorial design, two cultivars ('Paymaster' and 'Acala 4-42') were
      classed as intermediate in susceptibility to foliar injury, but there appeared to be a difference in
      statistics describing the dose-response function (equivalent to an 40% difference in threshold dose
      for one hour) (Heck & Tingey, 1979).
 In a concentration times duration factorial design, three cultivars ('Bel B', 'Bel W3', and 'White Gold')
      were classed as intermediate in susceptibility to foliar injury and one ('Burley 21') was classed as
      tolerant (Heck & Tingey, 1979).
  irnothv:
 Two cultivars ('Eskimo' and 'S48') differed in growth response to NO2 at 0.062 ppm when exposed at
      later stages of development (Whitmore & Mansfield, 1983).


 Red fescue:

 The growth of two cultivars ('Highlight' and 'Pennlawn') was not affected by NO2 at 0.15 ppm for
      10 days, but foliar injury occurred in 'Pennlawn' (Elkiey & Ormrod, 1980).


 Red clover;

 In three cultivars ('Astra', 'Deben', and 'S123') but not in a fourth ('Altaswede') there was a significant
      association between reduced growth of roots and ambient NO2(Ashmore et al., 1988).
August 1991
9-84
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 TABLE 9-6 (cont'd).  INTRASPECEETC DIFFERENCES IN THE RESPONSES OF
	        PLANTS TO NITROGEN OXIDES       	

 Orchard grass:

 Two populations (Rainham and 'S26') differed in susceptibility to foliar injury from NO2 at 4.8 ppm
       (Taylor & Bell, 1988).


 Perennial rvegrass:

 Two clones (Rainham and 'S23') differed with respect to growth under exposure to NO2 at 0.2 ppm
      and soil-nitrogen (Taylor & Bell, 1988).

 Two cultivars ('S23' and 'S24') differed as to the influence of stage of development on the growth
      reduction produced by NO2 at 0.062 ppm (Whitmore & Mansfield, 1983).

 Effects of NO2 on levels of nitrite reductase and bioenergetic functions varied among different clones
      (Wellburnetal., 1981; Wellburn, 1982).


 Kentucky bluegrass:

 In twelve cultivars,  NO2 at 0.15 ppm for 10 days produced a significant reduction in leaf area in one
      ('Baron') and  foliar injury in two others ('Cheri' and Skofti') (Elkiey & Ormrod, 1980).

 Exposure to NO2 at 0.15 ppm increased the growth of one cultivar ('Merion') but not in two others
      ('Cheri' and Touchdown'), that had foliar injury (Elkiey & Ormrod, 1981a).

 Exposure to NO2 at 0.062 ppm decreased growth in one cultivar ('Monopoly') but not in another
      ('Arima') (Whitmore & Mansfield, 1983).

 Among nine cultivars, rates of uptake of NO2 in light and dark varied over a three- to  two-fold range
      (Elkiey & Ormrod, 1981b).


 Petunia:
 A comparison of 15 cultivars with respect to foliar injury induced by one-hour exposures to NO2 at 8,
      16, or 32 ppm indicated a range of tolerance (EDjo) of about threefold; 'White Cascade' was judged
      the most susceptible (Feder et al., 1969).

 Nitrogen content in leaves of three cultivars ('Capri', 'White Magic',  and 'White Cascade') was
      reduced by  exposure to NO2 at 0.8 ppm (Elkiey & Ormrod, 1981d).  Rate of absorption of NO2 was
      less in 'Capri' than in the other two cultivars (Elkiey & Ormrod 1981c).


 Japanese morning glory:

 Four cultivars ('Heavenly Blue', 'Hamano Yosooi', 'Scarlet O'Hara', and 'Murasaki Jishi') had foliar
      injury ranging from severe to slight after a one-hour exposure to NO2 at 0.12 ppm (Matsushima,
       1977).


 African violet:

 With two cultivars ('Lena' and 'Rosa Roccoco') under CO2 enrichment, NOX at 0.85 ppm reduced
      growth in 'Lena';  a delay in flowering and decrease in number of flowers occurred in both cultivars
      but were greater in 'Lena' (Mortensen, 1985a).
 August 1991
9-85
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  TABLE 9-6 (cont'd).  INTRASPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN THE RESPONSES OF
 ___^^_	PLANTS TO NITROGEN OXIDES        	

  English ivy;

  Two cultivars ('Gloire de Marengo' and 'Harald') were exposed to NOX at 0.85 ppm under CO2
      enrichment; the growth of neither was affected (Mortensen, 1985a).


  Chrysanthemum:

  Two cultivars ('Refbur' and 'Horim') were exposed to NOX at 0.85 ppm under CO2 enrichment; the
      growth of neither was affected (Mortensen, 1985a).


  Hibiscus:                -       	••	•         •• ••     • •••     •       •••  -•••*••

  Two cultivars ('Red' and 'Moesiana') differed in some ways with respect to  the effects of NO or NO2
      on photosynthesis,  respiration or transpiration (Saxe, 1986a).

  Under CO2 enrichment, NO at 1 ppm affected neither cultivar with respect to mass, height, number of
      shoots, or production time (Saxe & Christensen, 1984,1985).

 Azalea;                                                                                   .

 Eight cultivars from five hybrid groupings had no foliar injury from NO2 at  0.25 ppm; however two
      cultivars (one a Kurume, the other an Indian hybrid) had reduced shoot length (Sanders & Reinert,
      1982b).


  Qranae;

 Five varieties of orange showed different sensitivities to defoliation by acute exposures to NO2
      (greater than 25 ppm) (MacLean et al., 1968).


 European white birch:

 Two clones tended to differ with respect to effects of NO2 at 0.062 ppm'oh growth (Wright, 1987).

 The relative standard deviation for growth during exposure to a mixture of SO2 and NO2, each at
      0.05 ppm, was about threefold greater in seedlings than in clonal cuttings (Whitmore &
      Freer-Smith, 1982).


 Poplar;

 Three clones of poplar (two from one, hybrid cross and one from another) differed in the degree to
      which exposure to NO2 at 0.3 ppm increased foliar mass and area (Okano et al.,  1989).


 Sycamore:

 No difference occurred between two half-sib families with respect to increased growth following
      exposure to NO2 at 0.1 ppm (Kress et al., 1982).
August 1991
9-86
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
        TABLE 9-6 (cont'd).  INTRASPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN THE RESPONSES OF
       ^_	   PLANTS TO NITROGEN OXIDES	
        Eastern white pine:
        Eight clones differed with respect to the relationship between concentration of NO2 (0.1 to 0.3 ppm)
            and the induction of symptoms and the decreased growth in mass and length of needles (Yang et al.,
            1982,1983a,b).

        Loblolly pine:
        Two collections [of seed] were exposed to NO2 at 0.1 ppm but no conclusions are possible as to the
            influence of genetic factors because there was no effect of NO2 on height or dry masses of top or
            root of seedlings (Kress & Skelly, 1982).                                          	
 1     cultivars of cotton.  This approach was also used to classify two cultivars of corn and one
 2     cultivar of tobacco as tolerant and three cultivars of tobacco as intermediate in sensitivity to
 3     foliar injury (Heck and Tingey, 1979). The same kind of experiment found different
 4     sensitivities to defoliation by acute exposures to NO2 among five varieties of orange
 5     (MacLean et al., 1968).  A comparison of 15 cultivars of petunia at three concentrations of
 6     NO2 yielded a range of tolerance to foliar injury of about threefold (Feder et al., 1969).
 7          Usually, comparisons have been made with respect to magnitude of effect produced
 8     within the  same exposure, which means that the dose-response relationship must be at hand to
 9     transform differences in response to differences in exposure required to produce equivalent
10     effects. The preponderance of evidence has been obtained from agriculturally important
11     species.  Although many different cultivars of several species of crops have been used, the
12     number of investigations in which two or more were employed under the same regime at the
13     same time is limited.
14          The effects of NOX on growth have been shown to vary with cultivar in barley (mass of
15     straw and number of tillers) (Ashmore et al., 1988),  tomato  (increases as Well as decreases
16     occurred) (Anderson and Mansfield,  1979), timothy at later stages of development (Whitmore
17     and Mansfield, 1983), and in clover  (Ashmore et al., 1988), and with clone as well as
18     cultivar in perennial ryegrass with respect to the influence of soil-nitrogen (Taylor and Bell,
19     1988) or the stage of development (Whitmore and Mansfield, 1983). In Kentucky bluegrass,
        August 1991
9-87
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     the occurrence of foliar injury as well as effects of NO2 on growth varied with cultivar
  2     (ElMey and Ormrod, 1980,1981a; Whitmore and Mansfield, 1983).
  3          Differences occurred among cultivars of potato with respect to NO2-induced effects on
  4     growth of roots or stem, and it was postulated that varietal differences in response might be
  5     related to maturity class (Petitt and Ormrod,  1984,1988). However, there were no
  6     differences between two cultivars of different maturities with respect to effect of NO2 on rate
  7     of senescence of leaves or in reductions in number or mass of tubers (Sinn and Pell,  1984).
  8          When plants were exposed to NO or NO2 under CO2 enrichment, differences occurred ;
  9     among eight cultivars of tomato with respect  to severity of foliar lesions and reductions in  ,
 10     growth (Mortensen, 1985b).  Between-cultivar differences were also found in effects  on
 11     growth of African violet (Mortensen, 1985a)  and in physiological response (Saxe, 1986a) but
 12     not in growth of hibiscus (Saxe and Christensen, 1984,1985), but no differences occurred in
 13     English ivy or Chrysanthemum (Mortensen, 1985a).
 14          Intraspecific differences with respect to  the effects of NO2 on growth also occurred in
 15     woody species (e.g., among eight cultivars of azalea [Sanders and Reinert, 1982a], two
 16     clones of European white birch [Wright,  1987], three clones of poplar [Okano et al., 1989],
 17     and eight clones of eastern white pine [Yang  et al.,  1983a,b]).  On the other hand, no
 18     differences were found between two half-sib families of sycamore (Kress ,et alv 1982) or
 19     between two collections of seed of loblolly pine (Kress  and Skelly,  1982).
20          Intraspecific variation in the metabolic responses of plants to NO or to NO2 (see
21      Section 9.4.2) has been demonstrated among  cultivars of tomato (Murray and Wellburn,
22     1985; Wellburn et al., 1980) and pepper  (Murray and Wellburn, 1985) with respect to the
23      levels of nitrate or nitrite reductase in leaves and foliar  content  of nitrate or amines.  In
24      addition,  the effect of NO2 on nitrite reductase varied among different clones  of perennial
25      ryegrass (Wellburn et al., 1981; Wellburn, 1982), and the effect of NO2 on nitrate reductase
26      varied among barley mutants deficient in  the enzyme (genotype did not affect uptake  of NO2)
27      (Rowland-Bamfordetal., 1989).
28           Cultivar of petunia affected the nitrogen-content of leaves after exposure to NO2 (ElMey
29      and Ormrod, 198 Id) and the rate of uptake of NO2 by the leaves (Elkiey and  Ormrod
30      198 Ic).  Among nine cultivars of Kentucky bluegrass, rates of uptake of NO2 in the dark
31      (adsorption) varied over a two-fold range and rates of uptake in the light above those in the
       August 1991
9-88
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     dark (absorption) varied over a three-fold range (Elkiey and Ormrod, 198 Ib).  The
 2     joint-distribution of estimates for rates of absorption and adsorption among these cultivars
 3     (Figure 9-13) shows that caution must be exercised in the drawing of conclusions as to the
 4     causes of intraspecific variation in response when only two or three cultivars are used.
 5            •
 6     9.5.1.3. Stage of Development
 7          The "critical periods of development" (van Haut and Stratmann, 1967) are one or more
 8     periods in the life of a plant during which an exposure to NO2 could produce the greatest
 9   '  adverse effect on yield.  Which  stages of development correspond to these periods depends
10     upon the species of plant:  for oats, the critical period is during flowering; for radish and
11 <;   mangels, during early tuber formation and at the cotyledonary leaf stages; for bean, during
12     the transition from vegetative to reproductive growth and during fruit development (van Haut
13     and Stratmann, 1967).
14          The inhibitory effect of NO2 at 0.068 ppm on the growth of Kentucky bluegrass
15     appeared to be greater during periods of slower growth in fall and winter than during periods
16     of more rapid growth in spring (Ashenden, 1979b; Whitmore et al., 1982).  With four
17     species of grasses exposed for seven months to NO2 at 0.062 ppm, Kentucky bluegrass and
18     one cultivar of timothy (but not another) showed a greater reduction of growth by NO2 when
19     exposed from emergence than when exposures started 6 weeks later; one cultivar of perennial
20     ryegrass (but not another) showed no effect when exposed from emergence but showed
21     reduced growth when exposures started 6 weeks later; and, there was no effect of stage of
22     development or of NO2 on growth in orchard grass (Whitmore and Mansfield, 1983).
23          In marigold plants at three ages (seven weeks apart), stage of development did not alter
24     the effect of NO2 at 0.3 ppm on growth—an increase in mass of roots (Sanders and Reinert,
25     1982a).  The effect of stage of development was not discernible in radish exposed at three
26     ages to 0.3 ppm (Sanders  and Reinert, 1982b) or in tomato at two ages exposed to 0.2 ppm
27     (Goodyear and Ormrod, 1988) because there were no NO2-induced effects on growth.
28          Each leaf of a plant also passes through progressive changes in sensitivity to NO2
29     during its development, which also depends upon the species of plant. In broadleaved plants,
30     sensitivity is low in young leaves in their early developmental stages, increases with
31     expansion, reaches a maximum with full growth,  and then declines.  Consequently, the
        August 1991
9-89
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
15-

14 -
13-
12-
if
t
ra 11 -
Q
C
10-
5 9-
§•
8-
7 -

6 -

5 -
A -
4


D Nuggat

D Sydsport
D Touchdow







D FyiUing D 3^ofti

D H 1 USn £] (jjgp j Qfj
D Baron
•
D Cherl


B • 8 10 ' 12 • 14 16 18 2G 22 2-






t •
•J












1
Uptake in Light niinus Uptake in Dark
'' •• v
Figure 9-13. Relation between uptake of NO2 in the dark and in the light for nine
            cultivars of Kentucky bluegrass; values are /d mm"1 dm"2 leaf area x 10~2
            (after Elkiey and Ormrod, 1981).
August 1991
9-90      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      location of foliar tissue with greatest sensitivity moves from the outer leaves toward the
 2      center with development of rosette plants, and from the base to the apex of shoot as it
 3      develops in caulescent plants.  In woody plants, a secondary flush of growth during the
 4      summer is less sensitive than the first flush in the spring.  In conifers, the most sensitive
; 5      foliage of spruce and fir is that of the current year when it becomes fully developed in late
 6      spring or early summer; that of larch is the needles of the spur shoots in the first week of
:i 7      emergence; needles of pine are most sensitive when they emerge in the spring (van Haut and
 8      Stratmann, 1967).
 9
 10      9.5.2.  Environmental Conditions
 11     .      Environment at its most inclusive denotes the aggregate of all external conditions and
 12      influences affecting a plant as  well as the medium surrounding it. Clarity is better served by
 13      reserving the term "environment" for the medium and using the term "environmental
 14      conditions" to denote its state variables and other properties that govern the exchange of
 15      mass, energy, heat, or momentum between a plant and its environment. In experimental
 16 '  '  work, environmental conditions have usually been treated as individual factors that are
 17     monitored and controlled at certain levels during experimental periods.
 18          These factors are commonly placed in two general classes:  (1) biotic, such as  pests and
 19     pathogens of the plant; (2) abiotic, such as physical and chemical properties of the air or soil.
 20     Nothing is known of the influence of biotic factors on the plant's sensitivity to NOX.  Because
 21     abiotic  factors can substantially influence the plant's  response to NOX, the association
 22     between temporal and spatial variations in environmental conditions and the occurrence and
 23     dispersion of NOX must enter  into estimations or predictions of possible effects.
 24           Studies of abiotic factors have been almost evenly divided between an interest  in their
 25     effects  on sensitivity to NOX and their use as manipulable variables to explore the
 26     mechanisms  of action of NOX. The results of both kinds of investigations indicate that
 27     environmental conditions exert their influence by altering processes controlling:  (1) entrance
 28     of the pollutant into the leaf;  (2) detoxification of the pollutant within the foliar tissue;
 29      (3) sensitivity, of metabolic systems to the pollutant (see Section 9.4).  There has also been
 30      some distinction as to whether changes in the levels  of one or more environmental factors are
 31      to be evaluated as affecting the system before,  during, or after exposure to NOX.
         August. 1991
9-91
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
31
  Consequently, some results may be interpreted as an environmental condition affecting
  sensitivity of the plant to NOX whereas others may be seen as NOX affecting the plant's
  response to an environmental stress.  These same considerations are also important in
  evaluating other air pollutants as environmental factors with respect to their joint action with
  NOX (see Section 9.7).

 9.5.2.1 Climatic Factors
      Climatic factors act on a plant directly from the atmosphere, and among those known to
 affect the response of a plant to NOX are light intensity, photoperiod (length of the daylight
 period during a 24-h cycle),  temperature, precipitation, relative humidity (RH), and the gases
 carbon dioxide (CO^, ammonia (NH3), sulfur dioxide (SO2), ozone (O3),  and hydrogen
 fluoride (HP).  (The joint-action of SO2, O3, or HP with NOX is assessed with respect to the
 effects of mixtures of pollutants in Section 9.6.)
      Except in greenhouse operations, climatic factors can be considered to be unmanaged
 variables, and they pose a problem  in the assessment of effects because their temporal
 variations may be coherent with changes in the  concentration of NOX at any site; and because
 variation in one factor is usually accompanied by variations in the others.
      The influence of light on the response of plants to NOX may be generally viewed as
 occurring in three domains.  First, there are the changes in intensity of light that may occur
 during exposures in daylight. Second, there is the presence or absence of light that
 differentiates exposures during day from those during the night.  Third,  there are the seasonal
 variations in day-length, which through an extended effect on growth and development
 indirectly affect the response of plants to NOX.
      Generally, susceptibility to foliar injury from NOX is greater in the dark than  in the
 light for most species of plants.  In bean, foliar injury was much more severe in the dark
 than in die light with short-term exposures (ten hours or less) over a wide  range of
 concentrations (e.g., 10,000 ppm [Dolzmann and Ullrich, 1966],  16 ppm [Kato et al., 1974],
 7 ppm [Anderson and Mansfield,  1979], or 3.5 ppm [Yu et al., 1988]).  In pea, spinach,
radish, dock, jimson weed, and two species of tobacco (Anderson and Mansfield, 1979) as
       August 1991
                                         9-92
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     well as with rose and rape (Zahn, 1975), the incidence or severity of foliar injury was greater
 2     with exposures in the dark than with exposures in the light.  Nevertheless, the difference in
 3     sensitivity between light and dark was not so great in barley (Zahn,  1975), and the sensitivity
 4     of wild tobacco was greater in the light than in the dark (Anderson and Mansfield, 1979).  In
 5     sugar beet, the concentration of NO2 required  to induce foliar injury was about tenfold
 6     greater in darkness than in light (Czech and Nothdurft, 1952).  With tomato maintained at
 7     1,000 ppm CO2, foliar injury decreased in severity with an increase in photon flux density
 8     (30, 95,  175,  or 250 /rniol mf2 s"1)  during exposure to 1.5 ppm NOX (20% NO2 + 80% NO)
 9    , for 25 days (Mortensen,  1986).  In  sunflower, nitrogen-deficient plants were more susceptible
10,     in the dark but those supplied with nitrogen as nitrite or ammonium were more susceptible in
11 -;    the light (Yoneyama et al., 1979).
12          Light is  probably the predominate environmental factor known to affect the uptake of
13     NO , and the rate of uptake of NO_ generally follows the same form of light-saturation curve
           X.                            "•
14 .    as do photosynthetic CO2-uptake and transpiration (Rogers et al., 1979b; Hill, 1971).
15     However, the effects of light on foliar sensitivity to injury as well as other lines of evidence
16     indicate that light intensity  can also affect mesophyll resistance to NO2 and that this could be
17     related to the  occurrence of NO2-induced lesions.  One of these is a discrepancy between
18     changes in the rate  of transpiration and uptake of NOX, which could indicate that stomatal
19     resistance increases while mesophyll resistance decreases during exposure.  A stable uptake of
20     NO2 over a 5-h period was accompanied an 11 % decrease in rate of transpiration (Rogers
21     et al., 1979b); in potato, uptake was not entirely explained by a first-order rate constant for
22     NO2 (Sinn, et al,, 1984).  Uptake of NO2 was  related linearly to photosynthetic flux density
23     (PFD) and doubled over the range of 0.2 to 420 fiE  mf2 sec"1 in a tomato mutant (flaccd)
24     that does not  have stomatal closure in the dark (Murray, 1984).
25           The presence  of light can influence not only sensitivity but also the form and
26     development of foliar lesions. In bean, chlorosis occurred only with exposures in the light
27     whereas exposure in the dark produced wilting and the occurrence of water-soaked areas,
28     which then became necrotic but remained green. Transferral to the light after exposure in the
29     dark accelerated the rate of development of lesions and produced bleached necrotic areas
30     (Yu et al., 1988).  In very young leaves of pea, alfalfa, vetch, and clover (but not of other
31     legumes), an  interveinal chlorosis was produced only by exposure in light and not in darkness
        August 1991
9-93
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     or when exposure in the dark was followed by a period of light. Nevertheless, the leaves
  2     became green again in the post-exposure period if subjected to light of sufficiently high
  3     intensity.  Exposures in the dark or of older leaves produced only necrotic lesions (Anderson
  4     and Mansfield, 1979). There was no effect of light intensity after exposure on the
  5     development of NO2-induced symptoms in lettuce (Czech and Nothdurft,  1952).
  6          Besides the intensity or presence of light, periodic variations in sensitivity within the
  7     quotidian cycle may also contribute to differences in response between night and day
  8     exposures.  Alfalfa was more sensitivite to NO2-induced foliar injury in the morning than in
  9     the afternoon (Zahn, 1975).  When subjected to 2-h exposures to NO2 in  controlled-
 10     environment chambers oat seedlings showed a peak in sensitivity about 12 to 16 h after the
 11     beginning of the light period; rye seedlings showed the same behavior in the light and another
 12     peak in sensitivity, higher than that in the light, in the dark about 2 to 4 h after the end of the
 13     light period (Figure 9-14) (van Haut and Stratmann,  1967; van Haut,  1975). There is also
 14     some evidence from exposures of bean and sunflower to NO2 at 4 ppm in light and darkness
 15     that a quotidian cycle could be a component of temporal changes observed in the  foliar levels
 16     of nitrite and nitrite reductase (Yoneyama et al., 1979). The degree to which light entrains
 17     the phase or frequency of these cycles of foliar sensitivity to NOX is unknown.
 18          The evidence is too sparse and contradictory to support any general conclusion as to
 19     whether NOX is more effective in dark or in light with respect to its inhibition or  promotion
20     of growth except that such effects may be determined by species of plant. In tomato grown
21     with CO2 enrichment (at 1,000 ppm), exposure to 1.5 ppm NOX (20% NO2 +  80% NO) for
22     25 days decreased mass of shoots at all photon flux densities (30, 95,  175, or
23     250 /imol m"2 s"1) but decreased number of leaves and length of stem only at the  two lower
24     levels of light intensity (Mortensen, 1986).  Daytime exposures to NO2 at 0.3 ppm, 10 h/day
25     for 2 weeks, had no effect on the growth of corn,  sunflower, or bean seedlings but nighttime
26     exposures produced the following: a decreased growth of leaves but not roots of corn; an
27     increased growth of leaf and stem (but not root) in sunflower; and, an increased growth of
28     stem and root (but not leaf) in bean.  In cucumber under the same regimes,  both daytime and
29     nighttime exposures increased the masses of leaf, stem, and root, but the increases were
30     relatively greater with daytime exposures (Yoneyama et al., 1980c).  Growth of roots,  but
31      not of stem or leaves, appeared to be greater with  a nighttime than  with a daytime exposure
       August 1991
9-94
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                    ea
              >.
              «j
              >
                    30
                    20 -
                    10 *
                         g     11
T^
13
                                              L
                                            I
                                                   T
                                                   19
^-
21
                                                             23
                                       Tlma of Exposu-e Cf<"~ 2 nours)
       Figure 9-14.  Variations in sensitivity of oat seedlings to foliar injury from NO2 with
                    hour of the day in light (L) and darkness (D) (after van Haut and
                    Stratmann, 1967).
 1     during the week following a 1-h exposure to NO2 at 2 ppm in 2-week-old sunflower
 2     seedlings; no effects were apparent in 4-week-old sunflower or in 2- or 4-week-old corn
 3     seedlings (Yoneyama et al., 1980d).
 4          Exposure of European white birch to NO2 at 0.04 ppm for 9 weeks had no effect on
 5     growth under a photo-environment with a photoperiod of 16 h and photon flux density of
 6     280 jLtmol m~2 s"1; however, NO2 increased the masses of stem and leaves as well as leaf
 7     area,  stem height, and length of internodes with a photoperiod of 12 h and a photon flux
 8     density of 100 jJ-mol m"2 s"1, which was close to the photosynthetic compensation point
 9     (Freer-Smith, 1985). The influence of light intensity is not separable from that of
10     photoperiod or temperature on seasonal changes in the effect NO2 on the growth of grasses
       August 1991
             9-95
   DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
31
 (Whitmore,  1985), broadleaved trees (Freer-Smith, 1984), or conifers (Freer-Smith and
 Mansfield, 1987).

 Temperature
      The inhibitory effect of NO2 on photosynthetic CO2 uptake in bean leaves was greatest
 (around 30%) at the optimum temperature for photosynthesis (around 30 °C), and lesser
 degrees of inhibition occurred above (about 22% at 35 °C) or below (about 14%  at 15 °C)
 this point. The inhibitory effect of NO2 on dark respiration increased with an increase in
 temperature  (from 39% at 15 °C to 51% at 35 °C).  Uptake of NO2 at 3 ppm by bean leaves
 increased with increases in temperature over the range of 15 to 35 °C  (about a two-fold
 difference between the lowest and highest temperatures) in the light; however, uptake
 increased about 75% from 15 to 25 °C but not thereabove in the dark.  The inhibition of
 transpiration  in the light by NO2 was 7% at 15 °C and 15% at 35 °C  (Srivastava et al.,
 1975b).
      The effect of temperature was not distinguishable from that of several other  factors that,
 could have affected the development and response of grasses (Whitmore and Mansfield, 1983;
 Lane and Bell, 1984) or trees (Freer-Smith, 1984) to NO2. The imposition of low
 temperatures  (less than 0 °C) during a series of exposures to NO2 could be regarded as a test
 for changes in cold-tolerance rather than an effect of temperature on the plant's response to
 NO2 (Freer-Smith  and Mansfield, 1987).
      With air temperatures in the range of -6 to 3 °C, there was no measurable uptake of
 NO or NO2 by spruce or pine, and the deposition rate was estimated to be less than 4% of
 that during the day with ambient summer temperatures (Granat and Johansson, 1983).

Mist and Relative Humidify
     The misting of plants during exposure was without apparent effect on bean'but tended to
 increase the rate of development of foliar lesions on spinach and young plants of barley and
rye (Czech and Nothdurft, 1952); it also increased the severity of NO2~induced foliar injury
in Kentucky bluegrass (ElMey and Ormrod, 1981). Although NO2 at 0.15 ppm in .continuous
ten-day exposures had no effect on growth (foliar area) of Kentucky bluegrass when mist was
present, NO2  increased  growth in the absence of mist, depending upon  cultivar and whether
       August 1991
                                        9-96       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     plants were grown with adequate or deficient levels of sulfur or nitrogen in the soil (Elkiey
 2     and Ormrod,  1981).  In the earlier study, mist was applied (total deposition of 0.67 mm)
 3     throughout a  1-h exposure (Czech and Nothdurft, 1952).  In the latter investigation, mist was
 4     applied for two 5-min periods, 4 h apart, each day during the photoperiod and increased
 5     stomatal aperture for 2 to 3 h after each  application (Elkiey and Ormrod, 1981).  Mist may
 6     be viewed as  effectively acting as an increase in humidity and thereby increasing or delaying
 7     a decrease in  stomatal conductance.
 8          Uptake  of NO2 at 3 ppm by bean leaves was 47% greater at 80%RH than at 45  or
 9     20%RH after 2 h of exposure and about 19% greater after 5 h of exposure. The inhibition of
10     photosynthesis of bean leaves by NO2 at 3 ppm tended to be greater at 80 and 45%RH
11     (22 and 33%, respectively) than at 20%RH (16%), and inhibition of transpiration by NO2
12     was greater at 45 or 80%RH (7 and 6%, respectively) than at at 20%RH (1%) at 25 °C
13     (Srivastavaetal., 1975b).
14
15     Carbon Dioxide
16          The joint action of carbon dioxide and NOX has received attention for the practical
17     reason that both gases are generated in the combustion of fossil fuels, particularly in the
18     greenhouse culture of plants when burners are used to enrich the atmosphere with carbon
19     dioxide and NOX arise as byproducts.
20          In general, it appears that when NOX inhibited growth at normal levels of CO2,  an
21     increase in the level of CO2 resulted in a net increase in  growth although there was still an
22     inhibitory effect of NOX.  In tomato, exposure to 0.35 ppm NO for 35  days at normal levels
23     of CO2 resulted in decreases in leaf area, mass of plant and shoot, and  relative growth rate;
24     with CO2 at  1,000 ppm,  NO increased leaf area and was without effect on the other variates
25     (Anderson and Mansfield, 1979).
26          The same general pattern also occurred with the effect of NOX on apparent
27  .   photosynthesis  (Uptake of CO2 in the light): an increase in the level of CO2 resulted in a net
28     increase in uptake although there was still an inhibitory effect of NOX.   In bean plants, NO2
29     at 3 ppm decreased apparent photosynthesis by a constant amount at concentrations of CO2
30     from 100 to  600 ppm and at 2,000 ppm. Because apparent photosynthesis increased with an
31     increase in CO2 concentration, the relative effect of NO2 decreased with an increase in CO2
        August 1991
9-97
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
30
31
  (Srivastava et al., 1975b). Photosynthesis was decreased by NO at 1 ppm, but the inhibitory
  effect of NO at 1,000 ppm CO2 was greater than, equal to, or less than that at normal CO2
  levels depending upon the species of plant (Saxe, 1986a).

  Ammonia
       Atmospheric NH3 reduced the severity of foliar symptoms produced by NO2, but this
  effect depended upon light intensity and species of plant.  In the dark, NH3 in: the range of
  2 to 7 ppm reduced foliar injury from a one-hour exposure to NO2 at 6.4 to 9.0 ppm in pea,
  wild tobacco, celery,  and bean (concentrations were different for each species).  In the light,
  the same kind of effect occurred in pea but not in wild tobacco. The action of NH3 was  .;
 attributed to its neutralization of the nitrous or nitric acids produced in the foliar tissue by
 NO2 (Zeevaart,  1976). (cf. Sections 9.3.2.5 and 9.3.4.2)

 9.5.2.2.  Edaphic Factors
      Edaphic factors act on the plant directly from the soil,  and those affecting the plant's
 response to NOX include soil moisture tension (and salinity) and mineral nutrition (level and
 form of sources of nitrogen or sulfur).  These may also be viewed as manipulated variables in
 managed systems through irrigation or fertilization. Although temporal variations may occur
 in edaphic factors, their  rates of change will be less rapid than with the climatic factors or
 concentration of NOX. Nevertheless, their spatial variations may be associated with the
 pattern of dispersion of NOX in a locality.

 Soil Moisture and Salinity
      The sensitivity of plants to NOX decreases as water becomes less available in the soil.
 The severity of NO2-induced foliar lesions in ten species of weeds, exposed to 20 or 50 ppm
 for 4 h, was greater for plants in  soil at about field capacity than for those near incipient
 wilting (Benedict and Breen, 1955).  Although stomatal conductance was not measured, it can
be presumed that this was decreased by water-stress and resulted in a decreased uptake of
N02.
     Increases in the salinity of solution bathing the roots of bean seedlings (by the addition
of sodium chloride to give concentrations of 20  to 80 mM) resulted in decreases in stomatal
       August 1991
                                         9-98       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     conductance, uptake of NO2, and level of nitrite in foliage exposed to NO2 at 0.31 ppm for
 2     2 h (Fuhrer and Erismann, 1980).
 3                                     ...-.-            •':•••
 4     Soil Suljur
 5          A level of sulfur (S) in soil, which was low  enough to produce foliar symptoms of
 6     deficiency, decreased the severity of NO2-induced foliar symptoms in Kentucky bluegrass
 7     (NO2 at 0.15 ppm in 10-day exposures).  Sulfur-deficiency also altered the effect of NO2 on
 8     growth (foliar area), depending upon cultivar: in one cultivar, NO2 increased the growth of
 ,9     plants  given complete nutrient but not that of S-deficient plants; in another, NO2 had no
10     effect on plants given complete nutrient but decreased the growth of S-deficlent plants (EMey
11  ,   andOrmrod, 1981a).
12
13     Soil Nitrogen
14          The availability of inorganic nitrogen (N)  in soil appears to affect the plant's response
15     to NOX in several ways,  such as the marginal value of NOX as an additional  source of
16     nitrogen,  the capacity of the foliar tissue to reduce and assimilate NOX, and other changes in
17     the physiological state of the plant that can influence its response to NOX.  These effects of
18     nitrogen in the soil depend upon concentration of NOX, species of plant, effect measured,
19     .degree of N-deficiency induced, and form of inorganic nitrogen supplied.  The incidence or
20     severity of NOx-induced foliar injury can be affected by the level of nitrogen in the soil or
21     nutrient solution  supplied to the roots, but the evidence is contradictory as to the effect of
22     N-deficiency on the sensitivity of the plant to NOX.
23           Some data show that NOx-induced foliar injury increases with an increase in
24     N-deficiency:  (1) a doubling of the level of nitrogen in soil decreased the severity of foliar
25     injury in  rape and barley exposed to NO2 and further increases in nitrogen (above that
26     adequate  for normal growth) decreased injury in rape but not in barley (Zahn,  1975);
27      (2) foliar injury in sunflower exposed to NO2 at 2 ppm did not occur with nitrate supplied at
28      15 or 5 mM but did when nitrate was absent (Okano and Totsuka, 1986);  (3) 'with exposures
29      to NO2 at 4 ppm for 3 h, injury occurred in sunflower (in the dark) without nitrate but not
30      when nitrate was provided at 10 or 100 ppm and injury occurred in bean (older leaves in the
31      light) provided with nitrate at 10 ppm but not at  100 ppm (Yoneyama el al., 1979);
        August 1991
9-99
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
31
32
33
 (4) severity of NO2-induced foliar injury decreased with increases of nitrate from 0 to 2 and
 5 mM and did not occur at 10, 25 or 50 mM in bean exposed to 3 ppm for 5 h (Srivastava
 et al., 1975c); (5) in short term (3-h) exposures to NO2 at 2 ppm,  injury that developed
 during the post exposure period of 2 days became less severe with  increasing levels of nitrate
 (Srivastava and Ormrod, 1984); (6) foliar injury was more severe in bean grown with
 deficient nitrogen under acute exposure to 17.2 ppm for 1 hour (Kato et al.,  1974).
      Other data show that NOx-induced foliar injury decreases with an increase in         ;
 N-deficiency:  (1) two out of three cultivars of Kentucky bluegrass had less severe foliar   :
 injury when grown under nitrogen deficient conditions and exposed to NO2 at 0.15 ppm   •:
 continuously for 10 days (EMey and Ormrod, 1981a); (2) foliar injury  of bean was more
 apparent when nitrate was supplied at 10 mM during exposure to NO2 at 0.5 ppm for 24 h in
 plants previously grown under deficient conditions (Srivastava and Ormrod, 1989); (3) foliar
 injury of bean occurred when nitrate was supplied at 20 mM but not at  lower concentrations
 during exposure to NO2 at 0.5 ppm for 5 days in plants previously  grown under deficient
 conditions  (Srivastava and Ormrod,  1984); (4) foliar injury occurred infrequently in bean
 exposed  to NO2 for 6 h/day over 14 days, and it tended to be greater in incidence in plants
 grown in 10 or 20 mM nitrate but not in 0, 1, or 5 mM in Hoagland's solution (Srivastava
 and Ormrod, 1986).
     It should be noted that the form of nitrogen can also be important:  (1) in cucumber
 subjected to acute exposure to NO2, injury did not occur with nitrate but did with ammonium
 salts as the source of nitrogen (Kato et al., 1974); (2) injury developed in sunflower supplied
 with ammonium or nitrite but not in deficient plants or those supplied with nitrate (Yoneyama
 etal.,  1979).
     Although NOX can be a supplemental source of nitrogen for plants in N-deficient soils,
 the boundary between inhibition and promotion of growth by NOX is obscured by many
factors but  tends to occur at levels of soil-nitrogen that are substantially  limiting to growth.
The interactive effects on growth of NOX and soil-N on growth have been studied most
extensively in  the following groups of plants.

Grasses:    In Kentucky bluegrass, the effect of N-deficiency on growth (foliar area)
           depended  upon cultivar:  NO2 increased growth in plants grown on complete
           nutrient but had no effect on N-deficient plants in one cultivar whereas NO2
           increased growth in N-deficient plants but had no effect in complete nutrient in
       August 1991
                                        9-100      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16/1
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
 44
 45
 46
           two other cultivars (ElMey and Ormrod,  198la).  With perennial ryegrass, there
           was no significant interaction of NO2 at 0.2 ppm for 11 weeks with level of
           nitrate on growth of shoots and roots although NO2 reduced senescence and mass
           of dead shoots at the higher level of nitrate more effectively in one population
           than in another (Taylor and Bell, 1988).                            ,

Cereals:    With corn, NO2 at 0.3 ppm  for 2 weeks increased the dry mass of roots by 46%
           at a medium level of soil-N and decreased root mass by 29%  at low soil-N with a
           5% or less effect on the mass of shoots (Matsumaru et al.,  1979).  With barley,
           NO2 at 0.3 ppm for 9 days increased root mass with no nitrate and increased
           shoot mass at 10 mM nitrate with no significant effects at higher levels of nitrate
           (Rowland etal., 1987).

Sunflower: The increased growth produced by NO2 in N-deficient plants  occurred
           predominantly in the youngest leaves with about a 180% increase in mass,
           whereas other tissues of the  shoot were increased about 25%  (Faller, 1972). At
           0.3 ppm in 7-day exposures, NO2 partially reversed depressed growth of leaves
           and stems, with  no effect on roots, and symptoms of N-deficiency in sunflower
        :•   grown on artificial soil receiving nutrient solution containing  0, 5, or 15 mM
           potassium nitrate with other nutrients at full strength (Okano  and Totsuka, 1986).
           In exposures for 2 weeks, 0.3 ppm NO2 reduced the masses of leaves,  stem, and
           roots by 11 to 17% at high levels of soil-N; produced a slightly greater inhibition
           of leaves and stem but a 45% reduction in root mass at medium soil-N; and had
           negligible effects on roots or stem but increased shoot mass by  17% at low soil-N
           (Matsumaru etal., 1979).

Tomato:   Exposures to NOX at about 2 ppm (in a carbon dioxide enriched atmosphere) had
           negligible effects (less than 5%) on fruit production (over four months) in plants
           supplied with 33 or 85 ppm N in soil but reduced production by 13% in plants
           supplied with 170  ppm N (Law and Mansfield, 1982).  Exposure to NO2 at 0.25
           or .0.39 ppm did not affect growth (mass of leaves or stem) with a nitrate level of
           28 mg L~* in solution supplied to the roots (which produced  stunted plants), but
           growth was increased by NO2 with a five-fold increase in the level of nitrate
           (Troiano and Leone,  1977). On the other hand, the mass of tomato shoots and
           roots was decreased in soils of high fertility by exposures to  NO at 0.2, 0.4, or
           0.8 ppm but increased and then decreased with increasing concentration of NO in
           soils with medium or low levels of fertility (Anderson and Mansfield, 1979).
           These effects on tomato with NO2 (Troiano and Leone, 1977) or NO (Anderson
           and Mansfield,  1979) could be viewed as changes in size as there were no
           differential effects on growth of leaves,  stem,  or roots.  Nevertheless,  exposure
            to NO2 at 0.3 ppm for two  weeks  at three levels of soil-nitrogen produced: no
            effect on mass of roots but a decreased mass of stem and leaves of about 20% at
            the lowest level; a decreased mass of leaves of 18%, stem of 24%, and roots of
            31% at the medium level; and, a slight effect on leaves but decreased mass of
            stem or roots of 15 to 20%  at the highest level (Matsumaru et al., 1979).
        August 1991
                                         9_101      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
33
34
 Bean:      The complexity of the interaction of concentration of NO2, level of nitrate
            supplied, and nature of effect is illustrated in Figure 9-15 for bean seedlings
            grown at five levels of nitrate (0, 1, 5, 10, or 20 mM) and exposed to four levels
            of NO2 (0, 0.02, 0.1, or 0.5 ppm).  When exposed to NO2 for 6 h/day over a
            period of 14 days, increases in concentration of NO2 produced: decreases in the
            mass of shoot with relatively slight decreases in mass of roots at the three lower
            levels of nitrate; relatively greater decreases in mass of roots and then decreases
            in mass of shoot at the two higher levels of nitrate (Srivastava and Ormrod,
            1986). When exposed to NO2 continuously for 5 days, increases in the
            concentration of NO2 produced: an increase and then decrease in stem length
            with no effect on foliar mass with no added nitrate; decreases in foliar mass with
          •  slight effects on stem length at the three higher levels of nitrate (Srivastava and
            Ormrod, 1984).
 9.6  EFFECTS OF POLLUTANT MIXTURES
      Typically it is assumed that the major effect of NOX at ambient concentrations on plants
 is through its participation in the photochemical formation of oxidants such as O3,
 recognizing that the phytotoxicity of NOX is quite low relative to O3 and SO2.   Given the
 broad variety of pollutant sources in the United States, it is possible that NOX will co-occur
 with other compounds, on either a local or regional scale.  Consequently, in a natural
 environment, plants may be exposed to varying combinations and concentrations of NOX, O3
 and SO2. Oxides of nitrogen in combination with compounds other than these is also
 possible, but will not be considered here due to a lack of studies addressing these
 combinations. To assess the impact of air pollutants on plants in agroecosystems and natural
 communities, it is necessary to consider  the possible impacts from pollutant combinations as
 well as the effects of individual pollutants.
     The publication by Menser and Heggestad (1966) provided the initial impetus for
 extensive research into the effects of pollutant combinations on plants.  They showed that
 tobacco (Bel W3) exposed to low concentrations of either ozone or sulfur dioxide was
 uninjured, but substantial foliar injury occurred when  the plants were exposed to both
pollutants simultaneously.  The authors called this response a synergistic effect.  Subsequent
 studies have confirmed this report and extended the observations to show that pollutant
combinations can influence not only foliar injury responses, but other plant processes as well.
       August 1991
                                        9-102
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------

1.10
1.05

0.95
0.90
0.85
0.80
0.75
0.70
                                      OmM
                                               1.10
                                               1.05

                                               0.95
                                                  0.80
                                                  0.75-
                                                  0.70
                                                                                1mM
          0.60
                       0.80           1.00
                     Shoot Mass {% control)
                                               0.60           0.80           1.00
                                                         Stio«Ma»<% control)
   1.10
   1.05
^ 1.00
   0.95
   0.90
|  0.85
|£  0,80
   0.75
   0.70
                                     5mM

                                           1.10
                                           1.05
                                           1.00
                                                 0.85
                                                 0.80-
                                                 0.75-
                                                 0.70
         0.60
                       0.80           1.00
                    3l»otM8$s(« control)
                                               0.60           0.80          1.00
                                                         Shoot Mass (54 control)
                      1.10
                      UOS
                     I 1X0
                     !, 0-95
                     •*
                     j 085
                     : 
-------
 Plant response to pollutant combinations depends not only on the components of the mixture,
 but also the concentrations of the individual pollutants, their duration, and temporal
 succession. Various external and internal growth factors may modify the plant response.
     The exposure regime is an important consideration in evaluating studies in which plants
 are exposed to mixtures. The evaluation must consider not only the reported biological
 impact but also determine if the pollutant concentrations and their individual and joint
 occurrences were reasonable in relation to concentrations and frequency of occurrence
 monitored in the ambient air. Limited analyses of ambient air monitoring data have studied
 the frequency of pollutant (NO2/SO2 and  NO2/O3) co-occurrence  (Lefohn et al., 1984; Lane
 and Bell, 1984; Jacobson and McManus,  1985; Lefohn et al., 1987). In general the studies
 have concluded that (a) the co-occurrence of two-pollutant mixtures lasted only a few hours
 per episode, (b) the time between episodes is generally large (weeks, sometimes months) and
 (c) the periods of co-occurrence represent a very small portion of  the potential plant growing
 period.
     When studying the potential impact of pollutant combinations on vegetation, the
 important question is: does the presence of a second pollutant cause a greater impact on :
 vegetation than the presence of the individual pollutants?  If a second pollutant increases the
 impact on vegetation, then this fact must be considered in establishing criteria to protect
 plants, in their various functions, from pollutant effects.

 9.6.1  Mode of Action
 9.6.1.1 Mode of Action of Pollutant Mixtures
     Underlying biochemical changes that may explain some of the detrimental effects on
plant growth caused by combinations of SO2 and NO2 (see Section 9.6.1, 3) have been
 studied (see also Roberts et al., 1983).  No changes in the in vitro rates of photosynthetic
 electron flow were detected in chloroplasts isolated from grasses (Lolium,  Dactylis, Phleum
 and Poo) treated with low levels of SO2 or NO2 (0.068 ppm each  for 140 d) singly or in
 combinations of SO2 + NO2 (Wellburn et al., 1981).  By contrast, ratios of
NAD(P)H/NAD(P)+ and rates of ATP formation  were much reduced by SO2 and
SO2 + NO2 fumigations. Furthermore,  levels of certain enzymes such as GDH (but not  GS)
were stimulated in a more than additive manner in SO2-sensitive jLolium perenne L.
August 1991
9-104
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
(cv. Aberystwyth S23) and mutant material, derived from S23 known to be tolerant of SO2
(S23 Bell resistant), when fumigated with SO2 + NO2 . However, no effects were detected
in another Lolium clone (Helmshore) collected from a highly polluted area around
Manchester, UK.
     Ammonia formed by the concerted action of the enzymes NaR and NiR is normally
assimilated into amino acids by the GS/GOGAT pathway within plastids whereas GDH is
probably involved in the breakdown of amino-acids (see Section 9.3.2.3). Why low level
fumigation with either SO2 alone or SO2 + NO2 should significantly enhance GDH activity
but not affect GS activity is not known.  High levels of GDH activities may be indicative of
secondary metabolic events, related to the removal of amino acids such as glutamate, which
occur in plant tissues as a consequence of exposure to mixtures of pollutants.
     Using plastid preparations from fumigated tillers of the SO2-sensitive grass (Lolium
perenne L. cv.  Aberystwyth S23), the possibility of changes in the levels of NiR activity due
to SO2 , NO2 or SO2 + NO2 have also been investigated (Wellburn et al., 1981).  SO2 has
no direct effect upon the levels of NiR activity, even at a relatively high concentration
                                                      i
(1 ppm), but NO2 alone induces a significant increase in NiR after 9 days at 0.25 ppm or
after 7 days at 0.5 ppm.  This feature has also shown by the SO2-resistant Helmshore clone
after 13 days of fumigation.  Most important of all are the combined effects of SO2 + NO2 .
In such circumstances, the presence of SO2 completely prevents the rise in NiR activity
normally induced by NO2 alone.
     Inhibition of a potential means of detoxification of the products of NO2 in plants was
also shown by all clones of Lolium and other grass species (Wellburn et al., 1981). After
           j                                    •         .'.,•,
20 weeks  of fumigation, levels of NiR activity in plants grown in NO2-polluted air
(0.068 ppm) were approximately double those in plants growing in clean air.  By contrast,
the SO2 + NO2 treatment failed to increase the  levels of NiR normally found in treatments
with NO2 in all grasses.  Indeed, with the exception of the S23 Bell S02-resistant Lolium
clone, all levels of NiR activity were significantly depressed below clean-air control levels.
The additional presence of SO2, therefore, prevents the induction  of additional NiR activity
normally associated with NO2 fumigation.  Consequently,  these plants are then open to
damage by the products  of both pollutants (sulfite and nitrite) in a number of ways at  the
same time.
 August 1991
9-105
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
      Until recently, little progress has been made with exposures to mixtures containing
 O3 + NO2 or SO2 + O3 + NO2 at the biochemical level.  In a preliminary experiment,
 which unfortunately did not include simultaneous exposures of 4-year-old Norway spruce
 (Picea abies L.) clones to NO2 alone, Klumpp et al. (1989b) showed that nitrate reductase
 (NaR) activities were enhanced by O3 + NO2 and SO2 + O3 + NO2 treatments in current
 year needles but reduced in 1-year-old needles. However, responses to the fumigation
 mixtures were highly dependent upon the availability of Ca and Mg to.,the seedlings. For
 example, inhibition of NaR activities by mixtures of SO2 + NO2 in current year needles only
 occurred when Ca and Mg levels were very low.  In the same series of experiments,
 treatments with SO2 + NO2 , O3 + NO2 or SO2 + O3 + NO2 increased superoxide
 dismutase activities in younger needles but peroxidase levels only rose in treatments
 containing SO2 (Klumpp et al., 1989a). This time, levels of both enzymes were enhanced by
 deficiencies in the supply of Ca and Mg to the plants which indicates that both pollutant,
 mixtures and mineral deficiencies elicit free radical-induced injury.
     Symptoms of injury caused by mixtures of SO2 and NO2 often resemble those due to
 O3 alone (Reinert et al., 1975).  For this reason, evidence for more fundamental damage
 induced  by free radicals, as well as changes in levels of enzyme activity associated with free
 radical scavenging, has been sought.  Generally,  O3 damage is  characterized by
 membrane-associated injury and, as a consequence, gradients of protons or other ions are not
 maintained (Mudd, 1982).  An effective and sensitive probe of proton gradients across
 membranes is obtained by following changes in the light-dependent  fluorescence quenching of
 an added amine like 9-amino-acridine (9-AA).  This can be applied  to a number of systems
 including the generation of a pH gradient across isolated thylakoid membranes which is
 generated by photosynthetic electron flow and then harnessed by coupling factors to  form
 ATP.                                                                  ,
     Changes in light-induced quenching of 9-AA fluorescence by detached thylakoid
 membranes obtained from lysed oat (Avena sativa L. cv. Pinto) chloroplasts have been
 studied in the presence of various concentrations of O3, sulfite,  sulfate, nitrite and/or nitrate
 (Robinson and Wellburn, 1983).  The ability of the photosynthetic membranes to create and
 maintain effective proton gradients in these different conditions  was  then determined.
 Relatively high concentrations of sulfate, nitrate, sulfite or nitrite were required  to affect the
August 1991
9-106
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
redistribution of the 9-AA probe in the light.  Pulses of O3, by contrast, were highly
effective in creating significant reductions in the light-induced quenching of 9-AA
fluorescence, even at very low levels (5 nmol O3).  This damage by O3 to the effectiveness
of thylakoids to generate proton gradients was aggravated by light.  However, a few seconds
later an additional repair mechanism was also detected but this appeared to  occur only in the
                                             '          • •          . . •    • .      ••'•,'
dark. Similarly, mixtures of sulfite and nitrite were also found to be a highly disruptive-
detrimental effects being detected at concentrations  as low as 0.1 mM of each.  This type of
membrane damage could explain the known sensitivity of plant growth to O3 alone or to SO2
+ NO2 mixed fumigations (see Sections 9.7.1-3).  Moreover, the destructive influence of
combinations of sulfite and nitrite indicate that, under certain conditions, the two together are
capable of initiating free-radical reactions within membranes (similar to those of O3 alone)
which cause a breakdown  in the mechanisms involved in the creation of proton  gradients
across mylakoid membranes. Nash (1979), during  chemical studies of mixtures of SO2 and
NO2, concluded that together these gases in solution produce sulfite radicals (SO3~)  which
exist long enough to seek  out sensitive disulfide bonds in proteins.  Related events may also
occur on other membranes such as the inner envelope membranes of mitochondria or plastids,
or the plasma membrane,  which are all involved in similar proton-dependent activities.
     Many investigations  have shown that mixtures of air pollutants can have a detrimental
effect on growth (Bennett  and Hill, 1975; Mansfield and Freer-Smith,  1981) but riot many
have linked interaction between pollutants to changes in physiological processes.  Bull and
Mansfield (1974)  showed  significant depressions of net photosynthesis in peas (cv. Feltham
First) due to SO2 + NO2  at levels of 0.05 to 0.25  ppm but detected no interaction between
the two gases.  By contrast,  White et  al. (1974) were able to find a more than additive effect
of the two gases on net photosynthesis in alfalfa (cv. Ranger) at concentrations  around
0.15 ppm of each but not  at higher levels.  Later work from the same laboratory  (Hou et al.,
1977) confirmed this result and demonstrated that doubling  the CO2 concentration reduced the
inhibition of net photosynthesis by the mixture. This effect was attributed to stomatal closure
in response to the'high CO2 levels.  Mixtures of NO2 (2.0 ppm) + O3 (0.3 ppm) inhibited
photosynthesis and altered the translocation of assimilates in kidney bean to a greater degree
than expected from responses to NO2 or O3 alone (Okano et al., 1985a).  Root and lower
stem of O3 + NO2 exposed plants received far less ph'otoassimilate relative to control plants.
 August 1991
9-107
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Ozone is well known for reducing photosynthesis; the authors speculate that the reduction of
 nitrite was inhibited by O3 and amplified by the presence of NO2, leading to the
 photosynthesis and translocation effects.
      Mixtures of SO2 and NO2 can also reduce stomatal conductance and transpiration
 (Darrall, 1989). For example, more than additive reductions in stomatal conductance of
 3 soybean varieties (Hark, Beeson and Amsoy)  due to SO2 (2 ppm) + NO2 (0.5 ppm) were
 detected in less than 5 h (Amundson and Weinstein, 1981).  In this case, NO2 alone had no
 effect.  Levels of over 1 ppm NO or 2 ppm NO2 are usually required for this to occur
 (Darrall, 1989; Saxe and Murali, 1989).  Carlson (1983) working in the short term (2-24 h)
 with soybean (Glycine max L.) and up to 0.6 ppm of SO2, NO2 or of both, however, found
 reductions in stomatal conductance for both gases separately and in combination. He also
 observed reductions in net photosynthesis and residual conductance as a result of the SO2 and
 the SO2 + NO2 treatments.
     Rates of inhibition of net photosynthesis in sunflowers (Helianthus annuus  L. cv.
 Russian Mammoth) induced by NO2 + O3 mixtures differ from those of SO2 + NO2 or
 SO2 + NO2 + O3 (Furukawa and Totsuka, 1979).  Mixtures of NO2 (1 ppm) + O3
 (0.2 ppm) decrease rates of net photosynthesis steadily throughout the exposure period' (2 h)
 while mixtures with SO2 induce an abrupt change to lower steady levels within 30 min.  Only
 in the SO2  + NO2 treatment is the extent of the inhibition determined by the levels of NO2.
     Stomatal conductances can also increase at low levels (<0.1 ppm) of SO2  (Darrall,
 1989) and enhance transpiration rates. Levels  of either SO2 or NO2 (both 0.1 ppm),  for
 example, cause short term increases in transpiration by beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.  cv.
 Canadian Wonder) during the first 3 days of exposure (Ashenden, 1979).  By contrast,
 exposures to SO2 + NO2 cause a short-term decrease in transpiration but, over the longer
 term, this effect may be reversed.  Exposure of clonal birch (Betula pendula Roth.) to
 S02, NO2 and SO2 + NO2 (0.02-0.06 ppm each) for 20 to 30 days resulted in significant
 rates of water loss from the leaves (Neighbour et al., 1988) due to all gaseous treatments.
     Rates  of dark respiration and net photorespiration in the experiments ;of Carlson (1983)
 on soybean were also reduced by mixtures of SO2 + NO2 as well as by NO2. Effects of
NOX alone on dark respiration have been discussed elsewhere (Section 9.3.3.1) but various
combinations of SO2  + NO2 + O3 can also stimulate dark respiration of current year needles
August 1991
9-108
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
of Norway spruce (Klumpp and Guderian, 1989). Using 11 different provenances of Norway
spruce, Saxe and Murali (1989) have shown that both night transpiration and dark respiration
are simulated by various mixtures of NO +  NO2 (2.5-9 ppm of each).  However, the most
sensitive population (Westerhof) showed 6.6 times less net photosynthesis and 5.5 times more
transpiration than tolerant 'Rachovo' spruce.  However,  at lower levels of NO2 (1-1.15 ppm)
no effects on  net photosynthesis or transpiration were detected.
     There are no reports of any changes in carbohydrate allocation in response to
fumigations with NO2 alone at concentrations between 0.04 and 0.4 ppm (Darrall, 1989).
Nevertheless, adverse interactions between SO2 and NO2 on root:shoot ratios (81% of
controls)  have been detected in barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Patty) fumigated for 20 days
with 0.1 ppm of each (Pande and Mansfield, 1985),  In  radishes (Raphanus sativus L. cv.
Cherry Belle), however, Reinert and Gray (1981) could  only detect additive effects of SO2,
NO2 or O3 (0.4 ppm each for 7 days).  Darrall (1989) has summarized the details of other
mixed fumigations in the literature which are known to cause changes in root:shoot ratios.
The mechanisms by which mixtures of pollutants bring about fundamental changes in the
apportionment of material between roots and shoots are not known but critical changes in
phloem loading and transport could be responsible.
9.6.2  Exposure Response Data for Pollutant Mixtures
9.6.2.1 Description of Foliar Injury
     Of the three major atmospheric pollutants (O3, NO2 and SO2), NO2 is the least likely to
cause visible injury because of both its relatively low phytotoxicity and low ambient
concentration.  In combination with other pollutants,  however; NO2 has the potential to
modify the injury associated with the other gases. Most of the descriptions of injury arise
from controlled environment studies.  Because of the generally greater sensitivity of plants to
pollutant exposure under controlled environment conditions, it is possible that the exposure
conditions which led  to the injury symptoms in these studies would  not result in similar injury
under field conditions.  Several key early studies clearly described the injury symptoms from
NOX mixtures and established the potential for enhancement of NOX injury by SO2.
A survey of six species' sensitivity to SO2/NO2 mixtures in 4-h exposures found that neither
2.0 ppm NO2 nor 0.5 ppm SO2 alone caused foliar injury (Tingey et al., 1971).  However, a
August 1991
9-109
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
mixture of 0.10 ppm NO2 and 0.10 ppm SO2 administered for 4 hours caused foliar injury to
pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), radish (Raphanus sativus), soybean (Glycine max), tomato
(Lycopersicon esculentwri), oat (Avena sativa) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum).  Exposure to
0.15 ppm NO2 in combination with 0.1 ppm SO2 for 4 hours caused greater foliar injury
than lower concentrations.  Traces of foliar injury were observed at 0.05 ppm NO2 and
0.05 ppm SO2; no single gas exposures were performed.  In these species, upper leaf surface
injury most often occurred as discrete interveinal necrotic flecking, except for pinto bean and
soybean, which developed a dark, reddish-brown pigment in the cells on the upper leaf
surface (Tingey et al., 1971). The authors noted that with those exceptions, upper leaf
surface injury was similar to that caused by ozone in most species. Lower leaf injury in the
two bean species was similar to the upper leaf surface injury, whereas  in radish and tobacco,
lower surface injury was noted as silvering of the interveinal areas (Table 9-7).  Fujiwara et
al. (1973) found greater-than-additive effects when peas (Pisum sativum) were exposed to
0.1 ppm NO2 in combination with 0.1 ppm SO2 .  When NO2 and SO2 (0.2 ppm of each
gas) were used, the effect was only additive (data not in Table 9-7).
     The effect of all three gases (NO2, SO2, O3) on visible injury of shore juniper
(Junipents conferta) was assessed after a single 4-h exposure to O3 (0.3 ppm), SO2
(0.15 ppm) and NO2 (0.15 ppm); the effects on visible injury were additive (Fravel et al.,
1984). The injury resembled small, elongated, tan foliar lesions in response to O3 and NO2,
and was similar in appearance to the injury noted after, ozone alone (Table 9-7).
     Bennett et al. (1975) studied the effects of NO2 and SO2 mixtures on radish (Raphanus
sativus), swiss chard (Beta vulgaris), oat (Avena sativa) and pea (Pisum sativum).  Treatments
consisted of 1 and 3 hour fumigations with the pollutants separately and with SO2 and
NO2 (1:1) mixtures in concentrations ranging from 0.125 to 1.0 ppm SO2 and NO2. No
visible injury occurred on experimental plants treated with NO2 alone or from exposures to
SO2 concentrations of less than or equal to 0.5 ppm. The minimum exposure doses which
caused visible injury to radish leaves were 1-h exposures to a mixture of NO2 and SO2
(0.5 ppm of each gas) or to 0.75 ppm of SO2 alone. The data indicated that SO2 and NO2 in
combination may enhance the phytotoxicity of these pollutants, but relatively high doses were
required to cause injury.  The remaining studies described in Table 9-7 do not detail the
August 1991
9-110
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
             TABLE 9-7. VISIBLE INJURY IN CONTROLLED
                   EXPOSURES TO NOX MIXTURES
Species
Tobacco


Bean


Tomato


Radish


Oat


Soybean


Radish





Marigold





Rhododendron


Potato

Kidney bean
Carolina
poplar
Black poplar
Gas Mixture
NO2 H


N02 -i


N02H


NO2 H


NO2 H


NO2 H


NO2 H
NO2 H
N02 H
NO2 H
NO2 H
NO2 H
NO2 H
N02 H
N02 H
N02 -
N02 -
NO2 -
'N02 -
NO2 -
N02 -
N02 -

N02 -
N02 -


- so2


- SO2


- so2


- SO2


r SO2


r SO2


h S02
h03
h S02 + 03
h SO2
h03
h SO2 + O3
h S02
h03
h SO2 + O3
h S02
h03
h SO2 + O3
h SO2
h03
h SO2 + O3
h S02

h SO2
h SO2


Exposure
Low episode
Medium episode
High episode
Low episode
Medium episode
High episode
Low episode
Medium episode
High episode
Low episode
Medium episode
High episode
Low episode
Medium episode
High episode
Low episode
Medium episode
High episode
Medium episode
Medium episode
Medium episode
Medium seasonal
Medium seasonal .
Medium seasonal
Medium episode
Medium episode
Medium episode
Medium seasonal
Medium seasonal
Medium seasonal
Medium seasonal
Medium seasonal
Medium seasonal
Low seasonal

High espisode
High espisode
Medium episode
High episode
Effect
0
-
'
0
O/-
O/-
0
o/-
0
0
01-
• - •
0
01-
01-
o/-
o/-
o/-
-
' -
-
-
-
-
?
-
-
-
-
-
b
-
-
- -

o/-
-
0
"
Reference
Tingey et al. (1971)


Tingey et al. (1971)


Tingey et al. (1971)


Tingey et al. (1971)


Tingey et al. (1971)


Tingey et al. (1971)


Sanders and Reinert (1982b)


Reinert and Sanders (1982)


Sanders and Reinert (1982b)


Reinert and Sanders (1982)


Sanders and Reinert (1982a)


Petitte and Ormrod
(1984, 1988)
Itoetal. (1984)
Eastham and Ormrod (1986)


August 1991
9-111
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
              TABLE 9-7 (cont'd). VISIBLE INJURY IN CONTROLLED
                         EXPOSURES TO NQX MIXTURES
Species
Oat
Beet
Radish
Pea
Shore
juniper

White pine


European
birch
Downy
birch
Sitka spruce

Radish
Black
poplar
Little-leaf
linden
Apple
European
birch
Speckled
alder
Loblolly
pine
Pitch pine
Scrub pine
Sweet-gum
White ash
Red ash
Willow oak
Loblolly
pine
Kidney
bean
Gas Mixutre
NO2 •



N02-
N02-

NO2-
NO2 -
NO2 -
NO2 -



NO2 -

NO2 H
N02 H








N02 -t







N02-f
N024
N02 -f

4- SO2



f SO2
f SO2 + O3

f SO2
t-03
J- SO2 + O3
f- SO2



h SO2

h SO2
h SO2








-03







•o3
• SO2 + O3
•o3

Exposure Effect
Medium episode 0
0
_
0
Low episode . 0
Medium episode
Medium episode
Low episode
Low episode
Low episode
Low seasonal



Low seasonal

Medium seasonal
Low seasonal O/-
0
0
_
_




Low seasonal
-
„
-
_
_
0

Low seasonal 0
-
High episode

Reference

Bennett et al. (1975)



Fravel et al,


Yang et al.





, (1984)


(1982)


Neighbour et al. (1988)



Freer-Smith
(1987)
Godzik et al
Freer-Smith











and Mansfield

.. (1985)
(1984)








Kress and Skelly (1982)














Kress etal. (1982b)

Okano et al.


(1985a)

+ denotes less effect of mixture than single gases;
0 denotes no different effect of mixture than single gases;
- denotes greater effect of mixture than single gases.
August 1991
9-112     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     appearance of visible injury but rather concentrate on whether or not its occurrence was
 2     enhanced by SO2 and/or O3.  These studies, which mainly focused on NOX/SO2 mixtures,
 3     mostly demonstrated that the likelihood of visible injury response to NOX increases with
 4     concentration of the other gas, and with the addition of O3.
 5          Very few studies have addressed the occurrence of NOX mixture injury in field situated
 6     plants (Table 9-8).  A broad survey of native U.S. species sensitivity to SO2/NO2 indicated
 7     that the addition of NO2 to SO2 (in a 1.0:0.28 proportion) did not cause more injury than did
 8     the SO2 alone (Hill et al.,  1974).  In addition, the injury from the mixtures resembled that
 9     from SO2 alone—varying with species, it appeared as regions of discolored  (tan, grey-brown,
10     yellow-brown, rusty brown) patches of interveinal necrotic tissue.
11
                    TABLE 9-8. VISIBLE INJURY IN FIELD  CHAMBER AND
                             FIELD EXPOSURES TO NOX MIXTURES
Species
Desert
ecosystems
Creosote
bush
Burro weed
Gas Mixture
N02 + S02
, N02 + S02

Exposure
High episode
Medium seasonal
High seasonal
Effect Reference
0** Hill et al. (1971)
Thompson et al. (1980)
-
        + denotes less effect of mixture than single gases;
        0  denotes no different effect of mixture than single gases;
        -  denotes greater effect of mixture than single gases.
 1          The studies described in this section make several points.  The first is that NO2 in
 2      combination with other pollutant gases frequently can result in more injury than is associated
 3      with the individual gases, particularly as exposure concentration increases or ozone is added.
 4      However, the occurrence of injury arises only from mixture concentrations which are much
 5      higher than those observed in the ambient environment.  The second is that the addition of
 6      NO2 to other gases does not result in unique injury symptoms—the combination usually
 7      causes symptoms which resemble those resulting from the other pollutant, or may resemble
 8      those from a pollutant not included in the mix. For example, shore juniper injury to
 9      NO2/O3 resembled O3 injury and desert native species injury to NO2/SO2 resembled SO2
        August 1991
9-113
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     injury, so that if NOX mixture injury did occur in plants, it would be difficult to positively
  2     identify the causal agents.
  3
  4     9.6.3  Losses in Growth and Yield
  5          When evaluating the available literature to determine the risk to vegetation from
  6     pollutant mixtures, it is important to consider the experimental exposure regime used to
  7     induce the response.  For example, were the pollutant concentrations and durations similar to
  8     what would be expected to occur in the ambient environment?  Was the frequency of
  9     exposure similar to what occurs in the field?
 10          An analysis of ambient air quality data from the United States showed that the
 11     frequency of pollutant co-occurrence (at concentrations equal to or greater than  0.05 ppm for
 12     both pollutants) was low, with most sites experiencing fewer than  10 h of pollutant
 13     co-occurrence during the growing season (Lefohn and Tingey,  1984). The report also
 14     indicated that the frequency of pollutant co-occurrence used in  most experimental studies of
 15     vegetation effects was much greater than the frequency of occurrence in the ambient air.
 16     A recent study in an area of the Ohio River Valley (United States), containing several
 17     coal-fired power plants, found that the simultaneous occurrence of nitrogen dioxide and sulfur
 18     dioxide was rare (Jacobson and McManus,  1985).  Using minimum concentrations of
 19     0.03 and 0.05 ppm for nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide, respectively, the authors  showed
20     that these gaseous concentrations co-occurred  for less than 1% of the total hours monitored.
21     Air monitoring data from central London, England, also support the conclusion that the joint
22     occurrence of nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide is small (Lane and Bell, 1984). The
23     authors characterized 3 months (January through March) and found that the joint occurrence
24     of the two gases accounted for less than 1 % of the monitoring time, using minimum
25     concentrations  of 0.05 ppm for each gas.
26         Lefohn et al. (1987a) conducted additional analyses of pollutant co-occurrence.  In the
27     study, co-occurrence was defined as elevated concentrations (using a threshold concentration
28     of J>.0.03 ppm) for at least 1 h anytime during the day (24-h).  The pollutant monitoring
29     (based on 110 site years of data for NO2 and SO2 and 71 site years for NO2 and O3) data
30     were obtained from co-monitoring sites located in both urban and rural areas. The analyses
31      found that the co-occurrences at most rural  sites (5  month summer period) were infrequent,
       August 1991
9-114
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     less than 12% of the days.  The infrequent co-occurrence is not surprising as most sites
 2     experienced only a few h/year when the concentrations of NO2 or SO2 were >0.03 ppm.
 3          To conduct experiments that are relevant to field conditions, it is important that the
 4     pollutant exposure regimes utilize concentration distributions and temporal sequences of
 5     exposure that reflect the area for which inferences are being made.  Unless this is done, it is
 6     difficult to extrapolate to field conditions using data from more intense experimental
 7     exposures.  For example, in a study on the effects of power plant emissions (nitrogen dioxide
 8     and sulfur dioxide) on native desert plants, the authors qualified their results with the
 9     statement that the pollutant concentrations, exposure  duration,  and frequency of exposures
10     were much higher than would be expected to occur around power plants in the area of
11     interest (Thompson et al., 1980),  In a study on the effects of air pollutants, singly and in
12     combination on poplars, Mooi (1984) attempted to simulate the long-term mean
13     concentrations of ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide that occurred in Holland.  Lane
14     and Bell (1984) analyzed 3 months  (January through March) of air quality data from central
15     London to design experimental plant exposures which simulated the distributions of sulfur
16     dioxide and nitrogen dioxide.  Lefohn et al. (1987b) have developed a procedure to construct
17    . exposure regimes that simulate pollutant co-occurrence. Additional studies that simulate
18     ambient air quality, including the joint frequency distributions of the gases, will provide
19     much needed information to properly assess the potential environmental impact from pollutant
20     mixtures on plants and ecosystems.
21
22     9.6.3.1  Laboratory and Greenhouse Studies—Sequential Exposures
23          Several newer studies are important because they assess plant response to NO2 in
24     combination with other pollutants in temporal patterns  of exposure which are more similar to
25     those observed under ambient conditions. Although they may not reproduce actual exposure
26     regimes, they explore modification  of plant  response to NOX by pre or post-exposure to other
27     gases (Table 9-9).  This concept was explored much earlier, by Matsushima (1971), who
28     observed more leaf injury on several plant species from a mixture of NO2 and SO2 than that
29     caused by each pollutant alone.  He also tested different sequences of exposure.  When
30     NO2 exposure preceded SO2, the degree of injury was similar to that resulting from
        August 1991
9-115
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
              TABLE 9-9. GROWTH/YIELD IN CONTROLLED
                   EXPOSURES TO NOX MIXTURES
Species
Radish





Marigold





Rhododendron


Tomato
Potato
Tobacco
Corn
Kidney bean
Pea
Potato
Tobacco
Kidney bean
Tomato
Kidney
bean
Populus
canadensis
Black poplar

White pine


European
birch
Betula
pubescens
European
birch
Gas
NO2
NO2
N02
N02
NO2
N02
N02
N02
NO2
N02
N02
N02
NO2
N02
NO2
NO2
N02
NO2




N02

NO2
NO2

N02



N02
NO2
N02
N02



NO2

Mixture
+ SO2
+ 03
+ SO2 + 03
+ SO2
+ 03
+ SO2 + O3
+ SO2
+ 03
+ S02 + 03
+ SO2
+ 03
+ S02 + O3
+ S02
+ 03
+ S02 + 03
+ SO2
+ SO2
+ SO2




+ SO2

+ 03
+ 03

+ SO2



+ 03
+ SO2
+ SO2 + O3
+ SO2



+ SO2

Exposure
Medium episode
Medium episode
Medium episode
Medium seasonal
Medium seasonal
Medium seasonal
Medium episode
Medium episode
Medium episode
Medium seasonal
Medium seasonal
Medium seasonal
Medium seasonal
Medium seasonal
Medium seasonal
Low seasonal
Low seasonal
Low seasonal




Low episode

Medium episode
High seasonal

Medium episode
High episode
Medium episode
High episode
Low seasonal
Low seasonal
Low seasonal
Low seasonal



Low seasonal

Effect
0
-
-
0
-
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
01-
-
0
.
0
0
-
01-
01-
01-
-

0
0
-
0
-
-
-
-
-


01-

Reference
Sanders and Reinert (1982b)


Reinert and Sanders (1982)


Sanders and Reinert (1982b)


Reinert and Sanders (1982)


Sanders and Reinert (1982a)


Marie and Ormrod (1984)
Petitte and Ormrod (1988)
Elkiey et al. (1988)




Elkiey et al. (1988)

Goodyear and Ormrod (1988)
Ito et al. (1984)

Eastham and Ormrod (1986)



Yang et al. (1982)


Wright (1987)



Freer-Smith (1985)

August 1991
9-116
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
            TABLE 9-9 (cont'd).  GROWTH/YIELD IN CONTROLLED
                        EXPOSURES TO NOX MIXTURES
Species Gas Mixture Exposure
Kentucky NO2 + SO2 Low seasonal
bluegrass
Perennial rye
..grass , . . .
Timothy
Orchard grass
Sitka Spruce NO2 + SO2 Low seasonal
Radish NO2 + SO2 . Medium seasonal
Black NO2 + SO2 Low seasonal
poplar
Little-leaf
linden
Apple
European
birch
Speckled
adler
Loblolly NO2 + O3 Low seasonal
pine
Pitch pine
Scrub pine
Sweetgum
White ash
Red ash
Willow oak
American NO2 + O3 Low seasonal
plane tree
Loblolly
pine
American NO2 + O3 + SO2 Low seasonal
plane tree
Loblolly
pine
Kidney NO2 + O3 High episode
bean
Effect Reference
Whitmore and Mansfield
(1983)
0
0
0
Freer-Smith and Mansfield
(1987)
Godzik et al. (1985)
Freer-Smith (1984)

-
~
0 Kress and Skelly (1982)
0
0
-
0
+ Kress et al. (1982a)
0

Kress et al. (1982a)
+ Kress et al. (1982b)

Okano et al. (1985a)
+ denotes less effect of mixture than single gases;
0 denotes no different effect of mixture than single gases;
- denotes greater effect of mixture than single gases.
August 1991
9-117
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
31
 individual exposures to either gas. But when SO2 exposure was followed by NO2 the degree
 of leaf injury increased as would be typical of simultaneous exposures to both pollutants.
      Spinach was exposed to SO2 and/or NO2 in various concurrent or sequential patterns
 within a 24-h period (Hogsett et al.,  1984).  During the day, plants were exposed to 0.8 ppm
 of each gas simultaneously for 2 hours, or sequentially to SO2 followed by NO2 (each for
 2 h), or NO2 followed by SO2 (each for 2 h): or, during the night, plants were exposed to
 either both gases at 0.8 or  1.5 ppm concurrently for 2 h. Each of the five treatments was
 repeated weekly for 5 weeks; two plants from each treatment-were harvested each week
 during the exposure period. Concurrent exposure during the day resulted in a slightly
 depressed growth rate at the beginning of the exposure period (Days 14-28), but by the end
 of the exposure period, market yield parameters were unchanged from control values.
 Sequential daytime exposures had no  effect on plant growth.  The nighttime concurrent
 exposures did reduce plant  growth, starting with the first exposures. By the end of the
 exposure period, both concurrent exposures had reduced total, leaf and root dry weights in
 comparison to control plants, and  1.5 ppm had reduced leaf area and fresh weight.  A lack of
 physiological or metabolic data make it difficult to speculate on the mechanism by which this
 effect takes place. However, this study suggested that concurrent exposure to SO2 and NO2
 likely has more potential for reduction of plant growth than sequential  exposure, and that
 plants exposed to darkness are less able to detoxify or repair NO2/SO2 stress.
      A similar study of tomato response to NO2 and O3 contrasted daytime sequential versus
 concurrent exposures,  and day/night sequential versus day or night exposures (Goodyear and
 Ormrod, 1988). In the first experiment,  plants at the 4-6 or 9-11 leaf  stage were exposed
 once for  one hour to 0.08 ppm O3 and 0.21 ppm NO2.  Leaf and stem fresh weights of
 4-6 leaf plants were smaller after exposure to the concurrent gases than in control plants.  In
 the second experiment, plants at,the 4-6 leaf stage were exposed once to 0.08 ppm O3 and
 0.21 ppm NO2 either concurrently for one hour or in either sequence, each gas for one hour:
 NO2 then O3, or O3 then NO2.  In contrast to the first experiment, concurrent exposure no
 longer reduced plant growth, but O3 followed by NO2 resulted in plants which were generally
 smaller (suggesting reduction in vigour) than those from  either control, concurrent or NO2
followed  by O3 treatments.  The lack of consistency in the effect of NO2 plus O3  between
experiments was hypothesized to be due to the difference in the time of day at which
       August 1991
                                        9-118
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     exposure to the gases took place;  the suggested mechanism was that stomatal conductance
 2     varies during the day, leading to differences in internal dose of the gases. The exposure of
 3   ?  plants to NO2 at night followed by O3 during the day had no effect on growth.
 4          These two studies (Goodyear and Ormrod,  1988; Hogsett et al., 1984) clearly indicate
 5     that NO2 has little potential for reduction of plant growth when it occurs as a single gas in a
 6     sequential exposure.  Since this type of exposure is more common in the ambient
 7     environment (see introduction), NO2 mixtures with other ambient pollutants such as SO2 or
 8     O3 are likely to cause little plant injury.
 9
10     9.6.3.2  Laboratory and Greenhouse Studies—Concurrent Exposure  •
11          A large number of studies on the interaction between ,NO2 and SO2 have been carried
12     out using plants grown under artificial conditions and exposed to concurrent pollutant regimes
13     which are less likely to occur under most ambient situations, but which may occur in the
14     vicinity of a source, such as SO2/NO2 near a power plant.  These studies may be useful in
15     establishing relative species sensitivities,  or identifying modifying factors of plant/pollutant
16     interaction (Table 9-9).  -.,.•-:'.
17   ,       Ten species native to the Mojave/Eastern Mojave-Colorado desert were exposed to high,
18     medium or low concentrations of SO2 and  NO2 for 25 h/week for a period of 9 to 32 weeks,
19     depending on the species and year of experimentation (Thompson et al., 1980).  In the first
20     year of the study, only the highest concentration mixture (1.0 ppm NO2 plus 2.0 ppm SO2)
21     reduced growth and/or dry weight of some perennial species (Larrea divericata, Chilopsis
22     linearis, Ambrosia dumosa, and Atriplex canescens).  The most extreme response was a
23     60% reduction in growth of L.  divericata.  These results were fairly consistent with the
24     second  year of experimentation, except that the growth of some of the species (L. divericata,
25     A. dumosa) was reduced by medium  (0.33 ppm NO2 and 0.67 ppm  SO2) and low (0.11 ppm
26     NO2 and 0.22 ppm SO2)'concentration gas mixtures.  In contrast, growth of Encelia farinosa
27     was increased by high and medium concentration mixtures (101% and 51%, respectively).
28  '   Of great importance was the observation that seed and flower production of two perennials
29     (A. dumosa and E. farinosa) were severely inhibited by all mixtures of the gases.  Since these
30     two species contrast in their growth response to the gas mixture, reduction of flowering in
31     Ambrosia may have resulted from generally depressed plant vigour,  while flowering in
        August 1991
9-119
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Encelia may have been directly inhibited by the gas mixture, allowing more photoassimilate
to be partitioned to shoot growth—perhaps NO2 was acting as a fertilizing source of N.  This
suggests that the survival of perennials, of either the same plant from season to season or the
germination of new individuals may be threatened by mixtures of SO2 and NO2, but only if
the ambient seasonal exposure increases significantly in comparison to current levels.  Like
the perennials, the growth of several annual species was inhibited by the high or medium
concentration mixtures (Baileya pleniradiata, Phacelia crenulata, Plantago insularis, and
Erodium cicutariunt)  between 40% and 80% compared to control. The flowering success of
several of these species was also reduced by the mixtures of SO2 and NO2.  This study
demonstrated that a high concentration mixture caused visible injury in a significant number
of species. It also demonstrated that response to the mixtures is species specific:  response to
the low concentration mixture stimulated growth in several species. It is likely that this study
optimized plant sensitivity to gases, as soil water was maintained at non-stress levels, and
relative humidity was high, ensuring that the rate of gas exchange was high.  The authors
noted that SO2 did not change plant response to NO2, so that the mixture posed no greater
threat than that from  either of the  single gases.
     The exposure of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) to continuous SO2 and N02 reduces
growth (Marie and Ormrod, 1984).  After  14 days in 0.11 ppm SO2 plus 0.11 ppm NO2 ,
tomato (cv. Fireball)  leaf area and fresh weight were about 50% of control plants. After
28 days, root growth (fresh weight) was reduced by 65%.  An examination of the data
indicates that root size was decreased similarly at seven and fourteen days, but this decrease
                                                      • i       -.      '   •
was not statistically significant (P  >0.05).  The same growth trends were seen in plants
exposed for the same periods  to SO2 and NO2 at 0.05 ppm; however,  these differences were
also not statistically significant (P  >0.05).
     Potato (Solarium tuberosum)  growth is reduced by exposure to concurrent SO2 and NO2
at 0.11 ppm. After 7 days, root fresh weight in Kennebec and shoot and root fresh weights
in Russet Burbank were reduced to about 60% of control values (Petitte and Ormrod,  1988).
After 14 days, the growth reduction included stems.  Although both shoot and root size of
Russet Burbank were reduced by pollutant exposure, roots  were more severely impacted than
stems or leaves, as indicated by the increase in leaf/root dry weight ratio and the decrease in
leaf/stem dry weight ratio at 7 and 14 days. Stems of this cultivar seemed to be the strongest
       August 1991
                                        9-120
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      sink for photoassimilates. A similar study of four potato cultivars exposed to SO2 and NO2
 2      at 0.11 ppm for 7 or 14 days indicated that cultivars with a late maturity classification
 3   .   (Russet Burbank and Kennebec) tended to be more sensitive than those of an earlier maturity
 4      classification (Superior and Norchip) (Petitte and Ormrod, 1984). The growth reduction of
 5      the two cultivars was similar to that reported in Petitte and Ormrod (1988).  These three
 6      studies indicate that plant growth may be inhibited by coAcentrations of NO2 which are
 7      non-injurious by themselves, when combined with SO2.
 8           The exposure of potato (S. tuberosum), corn (Zea mays}, pea (Pisum sativum), tobacco
 9      (Nicotiana tabaccum), and pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) to SO2 (0.15 ppm) and NO2
10     (0.10 ppm) continuously for 15 days resulted in little effect on growth (EMey et al., 1988).
11      Only potato (cv. Kennebec) had smaller shoot fresh and dry  weights in comparison to
12     control.  Tobacco and bean were then exposed to various combinations of the two  gases,
13     every day for  15 days, and the growth responses were mixed. Tobacco leaf area was reduced
14     by 0.11 ppm of both gases when delivered continuously,  or when 0.11 ppm NO2 was
15     combined with 0.34 ppm SO2 for one hour per day. Bean leaf area was also reduced by the
16     continuous regime, as well as by 0.05 ppm SO2 combined with 0.1 ppm NO2 on a
17     continuous basis.  Bean shoot dry weight was reduced by 0.11 ppm NO2 continuously
 18     combined with 0.34 ppm SO2 for one hour.  Kidney bean {Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv.
 19     Shin-edogawa) was exposed to NO2 (2.0 or 4.0 ppm) and O3 (0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 ppm)
20     continuously for 2, 4, or 7 days (Ito et al., 1984),  In general, mixture effects were  similar to
21    ' effects of ozone alone, indicating that NO2 did not increase injury from other pollutants.
 22     After 4 and 7 days, plant,dry weight from the gas mixture was smaller than control, and after
 23     7 days, the root/shoot ratio in plants exposed to the gas mixture  appeared to be smaller.  This
 24   ,   change in relative mass of the roots was likely due to alteration in photoassimilate transport
 25      from the shoot to the root, as the reduction in root mass was accompanied by apparently
 26      lower concentrations of soluble sugars (see 'Modes of Action' 9.6.1.4 for further  discussion).
 27           Exposure of Poa pratensis to SO2 and NO2 ,  both at either 0.4, 0.7, or 1.0  ppm,
 28      continuously for 20, 34, or 38 days resulted in a decrease in growth at 38 days which
 29      appeared to be linearly related to concentration of the pair of gases (Whitmore,  1985).  The
 30     treatments were not replicated, but polynomial regression would have been a valid approach
 31      to analysis, and it seems likely that the linear component would  have been significant.  In a
        August 1991
9_121      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
31
 second, replicated experiment, the dose (ppnrdays) was related to growth as percent of
 control; the dose response relationship indicated growth stimulation at low concentrations,
 followed by growth inhibition which related less to dose as dose increased.  Since single gas
 treatments were not included, it is difficult to comment on the effect of NO2 on the
 phytotoxicity of the other gases.  As well, ppnrday as a unit of dose is not in  widespread
 use, making it difficult to compare this study with others.  The sensitivity of grasses to
 SO2/NO2 mixtures is of particular importance in Great Britain where  these gases may
 co-occur, albeit at relatively low concentrations. A number of studies have examined growth
 responses of various grass  species to long term exposure to SO2/NO2  mixtures (Ashenden and
 Mansfield,  1978; Ashenden 1979; Ashenden and Williams, 1980).  Although each of the
 studies is non-replicated, they are very similar in methodology, and will be considered
 together. Each of these studies exposed various pasture grasses (Poa, Phleum, Dactylis and
 Loliwri) to 0.11 ppm SO2 and/or NO2, 5 days per week for 20 weeks.  All three studies
 reported reduced growth of shoot portions of the plants in response to the gas mixture, and
 the degree of reduction was greater than that expected from the response of the plants to the
 single gases.
     The response of Populus nigra to a single  1-h exposure to 0.5 ppm SO2 was modified
 by the presence of 0.5 ppm NO2 (Eastham and Ormrod, 1986). Leaf and stem mass tended
 to be greater than the control in the presence of NO2, and intermediate in  the presence of
 both gases.  For leaf area,  leaf fresh and dry weights and stem dry weight, the two gases at
 0.5 ppm were antagonistic  in their effect, in that the presence of one gas reduced the effect of
 the other.  However, when the concentration of each gas was increased to 1.0 ppm,  there was
 no main effect of the pollutants on growth, and no interaction between the gases  for either
 P. nigra or Populus canadensis.  However, all of the P. nigra and some of the P. canadensis
plants were visibly injured by the gas mixture. The latter pollutant regime may have been .
too severe for a positive effect on leaf area and stem mass (in contrast to the first regime),
but not severe enough for a negative effect on growth.                                   '
     The interaction of O3, NO2, and SO2 has been investigated less frequently than two-gas
interactions, probably due to the large number of treatments required to expose plants to all
possible combinations of the three gases.  Nitrogen dioxide did not modify plant response to
SO2 and O3 for radish  (Raphanus sativus) and marigold (Tagetes patula) when  exposed to
       August 1991
                                        9-122
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      0.3 ppm of all gases, three times for 3 or 6 h respectively (Sanders and Reinert,  19825).
 2      Nitrogen dioxide also did not modify response to SO2 or O3 except for a reduction in root
 3      and total plant dry weights of marigold exposed to SO2.  A similar study of radish and
 4      marigold exposed to 0.3 ppm for 3 or 6 h (respectively), nine times within three weeks
 5   ,   indicated that visible injury on radish appeared to be less than additive compared to the single
 6      pollutants for NO2/O3, and NO2/O3/SO2; whereas NO2/SO2 appeared to be greater than
 7      additive (Reinert and Sanders, 1982). The effect of NO2/SO2 and NO2/SO2/O3  on marigold
 8      was less than additive, but the effect of NO2/O3 was greater than additive. Marigold root
 9      dry weight in response to NO2/SO2 was smaller than control. ..This study demonstrates that
10     the presence of other gases can increase or reduce the effect of NOX on root growth,
11      depending on the plant species and the identity of the other gas.
12          A similar study exposing 16-day-old radish (Raphanus sativus) to all three gases at
13     0.1, 0.2 or 0.4 ppm once for 3  h resulted in no interaction among the three gases, and an
14     NO2 x O3  interaction only in reduction of root fresh and dry weight (Reinert et al., 1982).
15     Increasing  SO2 concentration to 1.6 ppm in a second experiment resulted in an interaction
16     between NO2 and SO2 in reducing root fresh and dry weights.
17          A study of azalea (Rhododendron spp.) indicated that there was no interaction among
18   ,  the pollutants, although NO2 combined with SO2 caused injury on some of the cultivars
 19     (Sanders and Reinert, 1982a).  The plants were exposed to all, combinations of the three gases
20     at 0.25 ppm six times during a  four week period.
21           Growth studies of yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipiferd) in response to various
22     combinations of O3 (0.07 ppm), SO2 (0.06 ppm) and NO2 (0,01 ppm) for 6 h/day for
 23     35 consecutive days indicated that the treatments differentiate after 2 weeks of exposure
 24      (Mahoney et al., 1984). At this time, the single gas treatments (SO2 and O3) had no effect
 25      in comparison to control,  and the plants grew Caller than those exposed to SO2 + NO2,
 26      SO2 + O3 or O3 + SO2  + NO2; and there was no difference among these mixture
 27      treatments.  Although NO2 alone was not one of the treatments, it is clear that the addition of
 28      NO2 did not further decrease growth in response to  SO2 +  O3 but its addition did decrease
 29      growth in response to SO2 alone.  A pair of studies on the effects of SO2/NO2/O3 mixtures
 30     on a variety of tree species demonstrated that the addition of NO2 to O3 + SO2 could
        August 1991
9_123      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
 suppress growth in sycamore (Kress et al., 1982a), or slightly stimulate growth in loblolly
 pine (Kress et al., 1982b).

 9.6.4 Field Chamber and Field Studies
      Long-term field study of the impact of SO2 on the effect of NO2 on plant productivity
 is a less common approach to gas mixture studies, likely due to the significant effort required
 to carry out such a large study  (Table 9-10).  Soybean (Glycine max L. cv. Northrup King,
 1492) was exposed to NO2 and SO2 in the presence of ambient O3 in a field situation
 equipped with a Zonal Air Pollutant (delivery) System (ZAPS) (Irving et al.,  1982).  In both
 years (replications), the plants received 10 fumigations; the concentrations of the individual
 gases ranged from 0.13 to 0.42 ppm for SO2 and 0.06 to 0.40 ppm for NO2.   Nitrogen
 dioxide exposures had no effect on seed yield in either year, while SO2 had no effect the first
 year and reduced yield by 6% the second.  The combined pollutant exposures reduced yield
 9 to 25%, depending on the specific concentrations of pollutants.  Premature leaf senescence
 was observed  both years in the plots exposed to both pollutants.  The authors concluded that
 soybean exposed to mixtures of SO2 and NO2, at concentrations which do not exceed the
 NAAQS, may display reduced growth and marketable yield.  Although the frequency of
 pollutant exposure (10 events/60 days) was not unusually high, the average concentrations
 and their frequency of occurrence, however, was much higher than typically measured in the
 ambient air at most rural sites.  The reduced yield may have been related to the measured
 decrease in chlorophyll in the concurrent plots (13-44%) versus the control plots. This
 reduction in chlorophyll content can be indicative of a premature senescence of the plants,
 leading to incomplete yield expression.
     The sensitivity of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) to SO2 , O3 and NO2 at either
 0.05 or 0.1 ppm for 4 h/day, for 35 consecutive days was clone specific (Yang et al., 1982).
 Pollutant combinations which included O3 were more injurious than SO2 + NO2 although
 some clones were insensitive (as measured by reduction in needle dry weight) to all
combinations.  The sensitivity of the clones (as measured by reduction in needle length)  was
dependent on the gas combination and the concentration (only one clone was sensitive to
       August 1991
                                        9-124      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
           TABLE 9-10.  GROWTH/YIELD IN FIELD CHAMBER AND
                    FIELD EXPOSURES TO NOy MIXTURES
Species
Creosote bush


Desert willow


Brittle bush


Burro weed


Four-wing saltbush


Baileya pleniradiata


Plantago insularis


Phacelia crenulata


Erodium cicutarum


Chaenactis carphoclinia
t

White pine
Yellow poplar
Italian ryegrass
Orchard grass
Italian ryegrass
Timonthy
Kentucky bluegrass
Orchard grass
Kentucky bluegrass
Soybean
Gas Mixture
NO2 + SO2


NO2 + SO2


NO2 + SO2


NO2 + SO2


NO2 + SO2


NO2 + SO2


NO2 + SO2


N02 + S02


N02 + S02


NO2 + SO2


Arsenal emissions

N02 + S02
N02 + S02



NO2 + SO2

NO2 + SO2
Exposure
High seasonal
Medium seasonal
Low seasonal
High seasonal
Medium seasonal
Low seasonal
High seasonal
Medium seasonal
Low seasonal
High seasonal
Medium seasonal
Low seasonal
High seasonal
Medium seasonal
Low seasonal
High seasonal
Medium seasonal
Low seasonal
High seasonal
Medium seasonal
Low seasonal
High seasonal
Medium seasonal
Low seasonal
High seasonal
Medium seasonal
Low seasonal
High seasonal
Medium seasonal
Low seasonal
Lifetime

Low seasonal
Low seasonal



Low seasonal

Low seasonal
Effect
-
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
+
+
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
0
0
0
-
-
0
-
-
0
-


-

-
-
~
-
o/-
o/-
o/-
-
Reference
Thompson et al. (1980)


Thompson et al. (1980)


Thompson et al. (1980)


Thompson et al. (1980)


Thompson et al. (1980)


Thompson et al. (1980)


Thompson et al. (1980)


Thompson et al. (1980)


Thompson et al. (1980)


Thompson et al. (1980)


Stone and Skelly (1974)

Ashenden and Williams (1980)
Ashenden and Mansfield (1978)



Ashenden (1979b)

Irving et al. (1982)
+ denotes less effect of mixture than single gases;
0 denotes no different effect of mixture than single gases;
- denotes greater effect of mixture than single gases.
August 1991
9-125
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
31
 0.05 ppm).  A comparison of needle dry weight and length response to the pollutants
 indicated that needle dry weight was a more sensitive indicator of pollutant stress in one of
 the clones.

 9.6.5  Factors Affecting Response
      While the modification of plant response to air pollutants by various biological,
 chemical, and physical factors has been quite widely examined for single gas exposures, the
 same modifying factors have not been extensively examined for gas mixtures.  Many of the
 studies which address modification of gas mixture response by external factors have not
 included single gas treatments, making it difficult to conclude whether the NO2 is more
 harmful in combination than alone.

 9.6.5.1  Physical Factors
     Light and temperature are the most common physical factors examined for their role in
 modification of plant response to gas mixtures.  In the fumigation of Betula pendula
 continuously for up to 12 weeks to 0.04.or 0.05 ppm each of NO2 and SO2 in low,and
 medium light intensities, leaf area  from trees exposed to the gas mixture at the higher light
 intensity was similar to that from SO2 alone (Freer-Smith,  1984). At the lower light
 intensity, leaf area response to the  gas mixture was lower than that observed in the SO2
 treatment.
     The response of grass species to SO2/NO2 mixtures as modified by light demonstrates
 that, as in birch, conditions which  are optimal for growth tend to  reduce the effect of the gas
 mixture on plant growth. A 46-day exposure of Poa pratensis to  0.40 ppm SO2 and NO2  •••
under light and temperature regimes which promoted either fast or slow growth indicated that
plant growth was reduced by the pollutant mixture more under slow growth conditions  than
under fast growth conditions (Whitmore, 1985). A 4-week continuous exposure of winter
wheat (Triticum aestivum) to 80-100 ppb SO2 and NO2 at different light intensities suggested
that the mixture caused an increase in the shoot-root  ratio as compared to  the control, and
that lower light intensity further increased the shoot-root ratio (Gould and Mansfield, 1988).
     Although these studies as individuals are poorly replicated, they demonstrate a clear
trend when considered as a group:  lower light intensity enhances  the reduction of growth by
       August 1991
                                        9-126
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28-
29
 30
 31
 32
 33
SO2/NO2 mixtures. The mechanism for this modification may relate to the role of light in
detoxification of either gas, or reduction in vigour (and consequent energy for repair) of the
plants.
9.7 DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY
9.7.1  Introduction
     In this chapter the biochemistry and physiology of individual plants and agricultural
crops have been discussed in relation to the types of injury induced by exposures to oxides of
nitrogen (NOX) and protection of the plant in part, either by exclusion or detoxification of
NCL.
    A
     A model can be constructed that summarizes the material presented.  A portion of that
model is shown in Figure 9-16.  The discussion in this section is organized to follow the
movement of gases from the atmosphere into the sites of action within the leaf. Eight major
processes will be discussed in sequence, leading from entry into the plant of atmospheric
gases to plant injury:

     Process 1.  Gaseous diffusion through the boundary layer, stomate, and substomal
                 cavity.
     Process 2.  Reactions of the gases at the cell's surface upon passing into a water phase
                 within the wall region of the cell.
     Process 3.  Movement of reaction product(s) into the cell.
      Process 4.  Enzymatic or chemical transformations within the cell.
      Process 5.  Disturbance of normal metabolism within the cells.
      Process 6.  Transformation of biochemical and physiological disruption into loss of
                 plant productivity.

      Processes 1 and 2 are, for the most part, dependent upon physical and chemical
 interactions and reactions between gases and surfaces. The concentration and species of gases
 within the atmosphere are critical for these events.  Processes 3 through 4 are normal
 physiological processes and can be investigated by standard biochemical methods.   Much that
 is described here is derived from a fundamental understanding of the biochemistry and
 physiology of normal events within the plant and from basic research.  Processes 5 and 6 are
        August 1991
                                          9-127      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
            Atmosphere
                 Guard
                   Cell
                2NO
                 Guard
                   Cell
                Epidermis
                                               Hydrated Wall
                                               Apoplastic Space
       Figure 9-16. A schematic of the movement of gaseous oxides of nitrogen into the
                   mesophyll cells of plant leaves.  The diagram has been copied from an
                   electron micrograph and gives approximately the correct relationships.
                   The actual dimensions are very  dependent upon the species and growing
                   conditions of the plant. The numbers represent the processes listed in the
                   text.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
pathological processes which disrupt normal cell homeostasis, or metabolic balance.
Homeostasis is largely governed by the genetic makeup of the plant and the environment in
which the plant is located.  Process 6 is the culmination of preceding events, which tend to
lower plant productivity generally by interfering with orderly energy or carbon
transformations or by lowering the efficiency of those transformations.
     Several new findings emerge from the recent data compared with the data summarized
in the last criteria document (U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency, 1982). One is that NO
      August 1991
                                        9-128     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      and N02 interact differently within the plant. Thus, the effects of NOX must be categorized
 2      according to NOX species.  NO2 is water soluble and can be incorporated into normal plant
 3      nitrogen metabolism, up to a certain concentration.  NO is a water insoluble compound and
 4      induces free radical reactions. While the exact sequence of reactions is still unknown, it is
 5      clear that NO behaves differently than NO2.  The third category contains the remainder of
 6      oxides of nitrogen, which are not well defined and whose reactions are poorly understood.
 7      For certain gases some processes function similarly, while for others quite differently.  Some
 8      of these differences will become better defined as the two major components of NOX (NO
 9      and NO2) are discussed.
10          Another new finding is that the cell can incorporate NO2 into normal metabolism, after
11      N02 is hydrated to nitric and nitrous acids that exist in ionic form in the aqueous milieu of
12     the cell.  Despite the fact that NO2" and NO3' are normal anions in the plant, too much
13     nitrogen can be toxic.  The conversion of the biochemical species can overwhelm the stepped
14     metabolic process so that the concentration can rise to detrimental levels.
 15           The rest of this discussion will be organized into five subsections: (1) atmospheric
 16     concentrations and composition of NOX; (2) entry and exclusion of gases; (3) initial cellular
 17     sites of biological interactions and pools of nitrogen compounds; (4) regulatory maintenance
 18     of reduced nitrogen compounds and possible detoxification; and (5) toxic reactions within the
 19     tissues.
 20
 21      9.7 2 Atmospheric Concentrations and Composition
 22           As summarized in Chapter 3, there are many different species of oxides of nitrogen
 23      with different oxidations states (Table 9-11).  While the concentrations and reactions of many
 24      of them have been investigated,  little is known about possible reactions with biological
 25      organisms for many of these compounds.  For plants the two major oxidized species (NO and
 26     N02) with their hydrated acidic species (HONO2 and HONO) have been reasonably well
 27     investigated.  Research on the effects of other species of NOX on plants, including the higher
 28     homologues such as N2O4, is rare.  Yet it is necessary to be aware of these other species and
 29     possible reactions with other oxidizing agents in order to understand the reactions that might
 30     occur within the plant under single or multiple exposures. For example, hydrogen peroxide
 31     is present not only within the atmosphere but also within the cell wall (but outside the
         August 1991
9-129
                                                            DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
34
35
36
37
38
   TABLE 9-11. TYPES OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN IN THE GASEOUS PHASE OF
                                   AN ATMOSPHERE
Formula
N02
NO
HONO2
N205
HONO
N204
NO3-
N203
NO+
Name
Nitrogen dioxide
Nitric oxide
Nitric acid
Dinitrogen pentoxide
Nitrous acid
Dinitrogen tetroxide
Nitrate radical
Dinitrogen trioxide
Nitrosonium ion
Oxidation State
(+4)
(+2)
(+5)
(+5)
(+3)
(+4)
(+5)
(+3)
(+3)
 Species are arranged from the highest to lowest concentrations in general urban atmospheres.  Structures and
 oxidation states are from Pauling (1953).
 membrane) and within the cell itself, even if at low levels.  The possibility exists for many
 further reactions of oxides of nitrogen with this compound in the atmosphere and in the cell.
 Also, compounds such as ozone will give rise to other oxidative compounds, such as O2~ and
 HO», when dissolved in water.  These multiple products and reactions set the stage  for an
 even more complex series of reactions under pollutant exposures involving several types of
 pollutants (e.g., SO2  and O3 with NOX).
     A dynamic equilibrium will be established between O3, NO2, and NO in the presence
 of sunlight (see Chapters 3-5).  Further reactions and transformations will occur in the
 atmosphere that affect NOX.  The amount of each compound in ambient air is not constant
 during the day, but each will be present in varying concentrations and must be individually
 metabolized by the plant.  As the components enter the plant tissue through the stomates,
 they will dissolve within the extracellular water and,  to a rough approximation, their solution
 concentrations will be governed by their solubility, as calculated by Henry's Law.  For
 example, at 0.1 ppm of each gas, the concentrations of NO and NO2 within the cell  will be
 2.0 x 10"10 M and 1.2 x 10"9 M, respectively*. While these concentrations are small by
    ***
     The solubility of NO can be easily measured since it unreactive with water (Schwartz and White, 1981) at
1.93 x 10* M/atm.  The solubility of the other oxides of nitrogen are more difficult to measure as they react with
water. On the basis of equilibrium arguments, Schwarz and White (1981) have given the following solubility
coefficients: NO2", 1.2 x 10'2 M/atm; HNO3, 2.5 x 105 M/atm; HNO2, 1 x 10s M/atm.
        August 1991
                                         9-130
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
metabolic standards, they could be quite phytotoxic at a protein level.  On the other hand,
while the gaseous acids (HNO2 and HNO3) within the atmosphere are low in concentration,
the solubility coefficients of these acids are so high that the corresponding concentrations of
each acid in the cell can become relatively large (e.g., the concentrations of HNO2 and
HNO3 can be as high as 2 to 5 mM).
     For the purposes of this summary it is assumed that NO2 and NO can form nitric acid
and nitrous acids which are able to ionize to form nitrate and nitrite.  A few of the possible
reactions and their kinetic constants are given in Table 9-12 (from Troiano and Leone, 1977;
Schwarz and White,  1981; Section 9.3).   There are many more possible reactions but their
rate constants are unknown, since individual concentrations of all reactants are not known.  It
is also not clear which of these reactions can occur within a leaf; few measurements have
been made under biological conditions.

9.7.2.1  Foreign Compounds in Plants
      Plants can deal with foreign chemicals by several methods  (see Levitt, 1980).  Gaseous
compounds can be excluded from the tissues or cells either because stomatal closure prevents
entry into the leaf or the impermeability of the membrane prevents entry from the cell spaces.
When not excluded, the plant can either tolerate (to a certain level),or detoxify the
compounds. Tolerance can occur by storage in a different tissue or organelle. Detoxification
can occur through chemical modification followed by movement of the newly formed
compound out of the cell, or through conversion into a compound which can enter the normal
 metabolic pathways.  For NOX several of these methods  could operate.

      Exclusion.  A compound such as NO does not easily penetrate the cell since its
 solubility in water is low. Yet its free radical nature seems to be too reactive to exist for a
 long enough time to move through a membrane (however, see later sections).

       Tolerance.  NO2 seems to be hydrated rapidly and its hydrated acid forms  move easily
 through water.  Once in the aqueous phase,  its products can  enter the usual metabolic
 pathways.  A reductive form of NOX, nitrite, however, can build up to higher than normal
 levels within the cell and so ultimately becomes toxic.
        August 1991
                                          9-131
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   S
   9
  10
  11
  12
  13
  14
  15
  16
  17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
     TABLE 9-12. POSSIBLE REACTIONS BETWEEN NITROGEN DIOXIDE AND
                             NITRIC OXIDE, AND WATER
1.  2N02(g) = 2H+(a) + NO2-(a)  + NO3-(a)
2.  N0(g) + N02(g) = 2H+(a) +  2NO2"(a)
3.  3N02(g) = 2H+(a) + 2NOcT(a) + NO(g)
                                                          2.44 X  102
                                                          3.28 x 10"5
                                                          1.81 x 10'9
 The reactions are shown as those which operate in a mixed, aqueous/gaseous phase (Pfafflin and Ziegler 198D
 Eqmhbnum constants at 25 °C taken from Schwartz and White (1981). Units are in M and Atmosphere's for
 the liquid and gaseous species respectively.
      In order to understand the level at which these compounds become toxic, the entrance
 of nitrate and nitrite into the cells and their cellular metabolism must be understood as well as
 the biochemical events that are initiated when concentrations of those compounds become too
 high for the cell to tolerate.  The remainder of this section will be devoted to these processes.

 9.7.3  Entry and Exclusion of Gases
      In order to trace the ultimate fates of gaseous species and to determine the levels that
 can overwhelm the plant's mechanisms for utilizing or detoxifying a gas, it is necessary to
 understand two major physiological processes: the penetration of the gas into the leaf and the
 solubilization of the gas within the leaf.
      The general movement of gases into a leaf is along a well defined path (Farquhar and
 Sharkey, 1981; Ball, 1987),  which gives rise to a linear flux law  of:
    j = g (C0 - Cf)
                                                                            (1)
where the flux (j) into the internal space of a leaf (in units of mole/m2sec) is linearly related
to the gradient of concentrations from the outside (C0) inwards (to q) (in units of mole/m3) •
       August 1991
                                               9-132      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     by a proportionality constant called the conductance (g)*. This conductance is a measure of
 2     what resistances exist to gas flow; g is inversely proportional to that resistance.
 3
 4     9.7.3.1  Internal Concentration of the Gases
 5          As described above for a given external concentration and a fixed conductance, the rate
 6     of movement 'of NOX will be dependent upon the internal concentration. Furthermore, the
 7     internal concentration is critical for reactions which will occur at the cell surfaces, reactions
 8   .  which depend upon the local concentration and the rate at which the gas is delivered to the
 9     site.  Many of the calculations regarding the amount of NOX which enters  the leaf are based
10     upon an internal concentration of NOX of zero, the simplest assumption upon which to base
11     the calculations.  Thus, the flux of nitrogen into the plant from NO2 is given as the stomatal
12     conductance (for water vapor but corrected for the diffusion coefficient of NO2 relative to
13     water) times the external concentration.  For ozone the internal concentration is very close to
14     zero (Laisk et al., 1989), most probably because ozone is so reactive with cellular chemicals.
15     For CO2 the internal concentration is clearly not zero; it is slightly less than ambient
16      (10-20% lower) when  the stomates limit CO2 flow and active photosynthesis is occurring
17      (SharkeyetaL,  1982).
18           While the chemical reactivity of NO2 is not high as O3, it can react  strongly with
19      chemicals contained in certain non-aqueous solvents (Pryor and Lightsey,  1981; Pryor et al.,
20 '     1982; Giamalva et al., 1987).  In water,  however, the real limitation for NO2 entering the
21      cell seems to be the rate of its solubilization in water (see later and Lee and Schwartz, 1981;
22      Lee and Tang, 1988).  While reactivity of NO2 with cell components may reduce its
23      concentration in water, one should not assume that the internal concentration of NO2 is zero.
24      If it is not zero, the use of a zero value for the internal concentration of NO2 will give the
25      maximum rate of flux through the stomates, but not the true rate.
 26        *Yet two points must be noted.  Not all gases follow the same path. Water evaporates on surfaces near the
 27     stomates so that the epidermal and only some mesophyll cells lose water to the transpirational stream. CO2, on the
 28     other hand, moves to where CO2 fixation occurs, generally in the mesophyll cells. In addition, Cowan & Farquhar
 29     (1977) have redefined the parameters of Equation 1 such that g is measured hi mol/m2-sec and C0/C; are measured
 30     as partial pressures of the gas. While this may be useful for water vapor, it does not follow the general definitions
 31     of flux and permeability (Troshin, 1966). Also we can speak of an internal concentration fraction of the external
 32     concentration (f = C; /CJ. Equation 1 then becomes j = g C0 (1-f).
 33
         August 1991
9-133
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1          Obviously, one method for determining the flux would be to measure directly the
  2     accumulation of nitrogen from NO2.  Some measurements have been made, but nitrogen
  3     accumulation from the air can not easily be distinguished from the nitrogen accumulation
  4     derived from soil fertilizers (e.g.,  nitrate).  As an illustration of how experiments can  „
  5     eliminate this ambiguity, Okano et al. (1986, 1988) have used a stable isotope of N to
  6     investigate the interactions of these two sources of nitrogen.  Furthermore, their data (from
  7     sunflowers) allow the calculation of the internal concentration of NO2. Their calculations
  8     show that the internal concentration of NO2 is about 68% and 83% of the external
  9     concentration at 0.3 and 2 ppm NO2 (7 days, 24 h/day), respectively, under all soil nitrate
 10     conditions reported.  The internal NO2 (based upon a percentage) is lower at the lower
 11     concentration of external NO2 than that at the higher concentration, indicating  a rate limiting
 12     reaction at the cell  surface at the higher concentration.  It should be noted that, not
 13     surprisingly, 2 ppm NO2 lowered conductances  and leaves of exposed plants showed some
 14     visible injury (Okano et al., 1988).
 15          The reactions  which are critical for the cell surface are: (1) diffusion and adsorption of
 16     NO2 into the water phase; (2) conversion of NO2 into nitrate and nitrite (see Equation 1 in
 17     Table 9-12); and (3) the diffusion to and reaction with their enzymes to convert them into
 18     needed biochemicals (nitrate-.and nitrite-reductase).  The rates for diffusion and conversion
 19     are important since the ability of the reductases to convert the oxides to reduced ammonia is
20     strictly limited. Unfortunately, no information regarding reductase activities was given in
21      these experiments by Okano et al.  (1986, 1988).
22          In a later paper Okano et al.  (1988) showed clearly that the amount of nitrogen
23      accumulated from atmospheric NO2 was directly proportional to stomatal conductance for
24     several plant species; low conductance led to low accumulation.  The highest conductances
25      led to visible injury in radish and sunflower.  Some NO2 accumulation occured when the
26      conductance was zero, but the authors suggested that this could be due to entry of adsorbed
27      NO2 through the cuticle. Other  data (Wellburn, 1990) indicate that this is not possible (but
28      see Rowland-Bamford and Drew, 1988,  for a  counter-example).  Also NO2 entering the soil
29      might contribute to  the apparent  nitrogen absorption by the roots,  thus yielding a false
30      accumulation.  However, the measurements of Okano et al. (1988) suggested that this
31      particular pathway was very small. Two important points must be made here:  (1) As in the
       August 1991
9-134
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     case of all gaseous pollutants, if the stomates are cldsed, no gas can enter and no reactions
 2     are possible; and (2) depending upon the chemical species involved, penetration of pollutants
 3     through the nearly impermeable cuticle is always possible, but the rate will be small and will
 4     lead to contradictory evidence.
 5          The solubilization of NO2 in water is a critical factor in determining the rate at which
 6     NO2 can enter the cell, but present data on that process are not very useful due to
 7     uncertainties in how additions to the water affect the solubilization.  Lee and Tang (1988)
 8     found that the mixing of gaseous NO2.into an aqueous solution depended upon the average
 9     speed  of the molecules  in the gas phase and an accommodation coefficient, which was the
10     fraction of gas molecules colliding with the water surface that dissolved within the aqueous
11     phase. That accommodation coefficient was dependent upon the chemical additions to water
12     and ranged from 10~7 for pure water to 6.3 x 10~4 for water containing  quinone.  The high
13     value  can be translated into an effective "conductance" at normal temperatures of
14     0.0585 m/sec. Under these somewhat specialized conditions,  the internal concentration of
15     NO2 ([NO2]i) can be then calculated when the flux through the stomates is balanced by
16     the accommodation "flux".*  For a stomatal conductance of 0.4 cm/sec, the internal
17     concentration fraction of the external concentration (f) is only 7%.
18           This value  of internal concentration is similar to values  calculated from the data of
19     Omasa et al.  (1980), showing internal concentrations that were 11 and 16% of external. On
20     the other hand, Saxe (1986b) studied eight different species as to their ability to remove NO2
21      from  an atmosphere with their transpiration rate and calculated that the internal concentration
22      fraction was very near zero.  The uncertainty of how much NO2 was removed from the
23      atmosphere by the soil, pots and foliage (surface reactions only) made it difficulty to be more
24      precise; yet Saxe's data suggest that f was extremely low.             '
25            Rowland-Bamford and Drew (1988) also attempted to determined the internal level of
26      NO2. Their experiments on  Barley at low light levels (20-25% of the level of full sunlight)
27      indicated that the level of internal NO2 was, at best,  only about 5-10% that of the external
•28      level (at 0.3  ppm). That level was lowest in the morning and rose significantly in the
            "This balance "occurs when the accommodation coefficient (RJ times the internal concentration ([NOJ^ times
        the average speed of the molecules (which depends upon the gas temperature) equal the real gas conductance (g)
        times the difference between the external and internal gas concentration.  If the internal concentration is defined as
        f X [NOJ where [NOJ is the external concentration, then f = g
         August 1991
9_135      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
31
  afternoon. Interestingly, at the lowest light intensity, the net flux rate (per unit of light) was
  quite low, while at higher light levels, the flux rate became nearly a thousand-fold higher.
  Incident light can simulate total NO2 incorporation and so reduce the internal level of NOo.
          ,                    •     •        •                           •            • I£*'
  As will be discussed later, this dependence of NO2 incorporation on light is due to nitrite
  reductase activity,  which is dependent upon photosynthetic  electron transport.  Light energy
  builds reducing power, which causes a more  rapid conversion of the acidic forms of hydrated
  NO2intoNH4+.
      The rate of entry of the NO2 into the leaf is only one step in the process of nitrogen
  accumulation. The rate at which its hydrated products can be incorporated into the normal
  metabolism of the leaf also plays an important role in determining possible limitations to the
 use of the nitrogen of NO2 in the cell. These interrelationships can determine how fast NO2
 can enter the plant tissue and increase the total N-load upon the plant.

 9.7.3.2  Interfacial Movement of the Gases into the Water Phase
      The movement of NO into the leaf is  an entirely different question  due principally to
 its chemical structure. While some authors believe that NO can be converted into soluble
 compounds, chemical investigations (Wellburn, 1990; Equation 2 of Table 9-12) suggest that
 NO is relatively insoluble and, by itself, non-reactive with water. Thus only a small amount
 of NO will enter the water phase unless it encounters a reactive aqueous species (usually a
 free radical; WeUburn, 1990). Since unbounded free radicals are relatively rare in biological
 systems, the path of diffusion will be long and the rate of reaction slow.  Therefore, the
 internal concentration of NO should be similar to the external concentration, and the stomates
 will exert only a small effect upon the rate of  NO reactions.
     On the other hand, it is clear from the equilibrium relations that NO and NO2 together
 can be reactive (see Equations 2 and 3 in Table 9-12).  At concentrations of 0.1 ppm, the
 amount of NO2~ which can be formed from  both NO and NO2 would be 2.3 x 10'8/[H+] M,
 where the [H+] is the local concentration.  If the combined reaction between NO and NO2
occurred within the  acidic cell wall ([H+] = ca. 3 x 1Q'4 N), then the concentration of
NO2- formed within the wall could be nearly 100 ^M at equilibrium.  It is doubtful that
under natural conditions NO can occur without some NO2 being present (Lefohn et al.,
1990). Unfortunately, measurements in the  field and in the laboratory have,rarely measured
       August 1991
                                        9-136      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16,
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
each species independently; making it difficult to find which nitrogen species places the plants
at risk.
     The,calculated internal concentrations are slightly different, if one assumes that NO2
occurs,alone and that the level of internal NO2 (equal to f x [NO2]0, where f < 1) is lower
than the external value.  The assumption must be made that these reactions are in equilibrium
with the aqueous environment of the cell wall (at a pH of 4.3). The amounts of nitrate and
nitrite in equilibrium with that internal NO2 level (as ppm), is given as:
[N02~][N03-J = 2.44 x 102 [NO2]2 f2 / [H+]2
For [NO2]  =0.1 ppm, this becomes:
     [N02-][N031  = 2.44 x  10'4 f2
                                                                                  (2)
                                                                             (2)
As will be seen later, a reasonable guess for the cellular concentration of nitrate and nitrite,
based upon enzyme activity, would be 4.5 mM and 100 uM, respectively.  Thus,
[NO2.][NO3.i = 10"4 x 5  X 10"3 = 5 X 10"7 M2.  Thus either f = 2-3% and the level of
internal NO2 is very much reduced,  as suggested earlier, or the level of both nitrite and
nitrate will be much larger than the above reasonable guesses.

9.7.4   Initial Cellular Sites of Biological  Interaction and Pools of Nitrogen
         Compounds
9.7.4*1  Role of Oxides of Nitrogen in Metabolism
     The hydration products as NO2 is converted into NO2~ and NO3" through interaction
with water are normal anions within the plant, and as such Can be incorporated into normal
metabolic pathways, up to certain maximum rates, dependent upon nitrogen supply from the
roots and type of plant.  Where both NO and NO2 are present, NO seems also to  be
converted into nitrite and nitrate. Metabolic incorporation leads to detoxification of most of
the species of NOX, making the potentially toxic compounds not only harmless to  the plant
but important to its normal growth.  Naturally the incorporation alters  the nitrogen level
within the plant and so alters the "normal" state of the plant, where  "normal" is defined as
        August 1991,
                                        . 9-137
                                              DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 that state before its fumigation by NO2.  In addition, under high levels of NO2 flux into the
 plant, incorporation could overwhelm the nitrogen metabolism and cause the plant to deviate
 too far from its normally balanced state,  such that the plant could not restore its previous
 homeostatic state after fumigation.
      In order to discuss these concepts more completely two areas must be well defined:
 (1) what types of metabolic pathways are available to NOx compounds and (2) what is meant
 by the "normal" state and how far can plants deviate from that state without permanent
 damage to the plant.

 9.7.4.2  Metabolic Pathways                          ......
      Plants require reduced nitrogen compounds to form proteins, nucleic acids, and many
 secondary products in order to survive and grow.  Under  most circumstances, nitrogen enters
 the plant through the roots in three modes: (1) absorption of ammonia (and ammonium),
 (2) absorption of nitrate (and  nitrite), and (3) nitrogen fixation by symbiotic organisms. Thus,
 any pollutant that can be converted chemically or biologically  into nitrate, nitrite, or ammonia
 can be used by the plant. NOX which falls upon the soil has the potential of being easily
 converted by microbial or chemical action and so can be readily  adsorbed by the roots.
 Ground deposited NOX can enter the metabolic pathway readily through the soil/root   ,
 interface, although deposition can overload the soil/plant systems (see chapter 10).  Gaseous
 NOX which enters through the leaf can likewise be converted through enzyme systems which
 can handle the derived compounds.
     The chemical species which will be  dealt with are nitrous acid, ammonium ion,  and
 nitric acid.  The first two are  a weak acid and weak base,  respectively (see Equations 3 and 4
below), and, therefore, their actual chemical forms are dependent upon pH.  These forms
govern the manner in which these chemicals can move throughout the plant.  At normal
biological pH, both species  (acid and  salt) of each compound can exist within an organelle or
tissue. On the other hand, nitric acid is such a strong acid that it exists predominantly as a
nitrate ion under all biological conditions.
           HN02 == H+ + N02-  (pK = 3.3)
                                (3)
       August 1991
                                        9-138
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15-
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
           NH4+  == H+ + NH3  (pK = 9.2)
           HN03  == H+ + N03" (pK =-1.3)
(4)

(5)
     While plants can use both ammonium and nitrate, nitrate seems to be safer even in high
concentrations for the plant and, thus, is classed as a "relatively innocuous" compound
(Miflin, 1980). Nitrite seems to be 'a compound whose concentration is highly regulated and
is maintained at low levels within the plant.  Ammonium seems likewise to be highly
regulated and its concentration is also kept at low levels.  The biological protocol to prevent
high ammonia levels is to convert, as rapidly as possible, ammonium to amino groups.
     Nitrate is converted first to nitrite via the enzyme, nitrate reductase, with the resulting
nitrite being converted to ammonia by another enzyme, nitrite reductase.  The full conversion
of nitrate into ammonia requires 8 electrons or the equivalent of 4 molecules of NAD(P)H
per molecule of NO3".  Since each NAD(P)H has  a free energy content of about
28 kcal/mole, one mole of NO3' •* NH4+ requires about 115 kcal/mole of energy or about
the equivalent of 18% of a glucose molecule (see Schubert and Wolk, 1982).  Another
manner in which to express the energy requirement  for nitrogen conversion is  to express it as
carbon lost per nitrogen gain.  Thus, one nitrogen converted as above is equivalent to a
minimum carbon loss of  1.1 (mole/mole). Yet Amthor (1989) states that if growth and
maintenance respiration did not change during measurements, the value of carbon respired to
nitrogen assimilated was  as high as 2 to 3.5.  For the  most part, energy as reducing  -
equivalents come from carbohydrate  or organic acids oxidation (glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid
cycle or photosynthesis).  Thus, ammonia fertilizer is  energetically "cheaper"  for the plant to
use but can be more toxic, if not  well regulated.  Nitrate requires more energy;  thus, it
would appear that there is less for the total plant productivity.  Yet it is hard to  demonstrate
the lowering of plant productivity by concurrent nitrogen reduction (Robinson, 1988).
     More recently detailed flux  and pool balance sheets in nitrogen metabolism have been
prepared.  For example,  Magalhaes et al. (1990) have shown that NH4+ can: move into corn
roots at a rate of 1.75 ^mole N/g FW h"1* and then move into the shoots at a rate of
     g FW is grams of fresh weight of plant material.
        August 1991
                                        . 9-139      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
 1.25 /imole N/g FW If1.  The NH4+ pools were 3.85 and 0.45 jwmole/g FW for the root and
 shoot, respectively (corresponding approximately to 4 and 0.5 mM for a soil NH4+ level of
 50 mM).  On the other hand, cow pea cultured cells will maintain an internal NH4+ level of
 only 0.1 /-unole/g FW with an external NH4+ level of 88 mM (Mayer et al.,  1990).  Rates  of
 nitrate reductase have been measured to be 4-6 and 2-3 jwmole/g FW h"1 for barley and corn
 roots, respectively (Siddiqui et al.,  1990).  WeUburn (1984) measured nitrate- and
 nitrite-reductase activities in tomato (resistant to  NO2 exposures) as 3.6 to 5.4 jwmole/g
 FW h"1, respectively.  Woodin et al.  (1985) measured  nitrate reductase as 0.4 /*mole/g
 FW h"1, yet upon NO3" fertilization that value rose five-fold in less than a day to 2 ^mole/g
 FW h"1.  Thus, it seems that the rate of nitrogen reduction can range from 0.4 to 5 jwmole/g
 FW h"1, depending upon the species and soil fertilizer concentration.
      Although the emphasis of this chapter is on how the movement of gaseous NOX affects
 plant growth, it is important to understand total nitrogen metabolism at the root level.  The
 two nitrogen sources can strongly interact with each other.  First, NOX and dry deposited N
 (acids of nitrogen compounds) can fall upon the ground and be incorporated into the soil
 where they can be absorbed by the roots.  With cultivated crops, this is trivial since much
 more nitrogen is added by the grower as  fertilizer.  In natural regions, for example,
 rangelands and forests, soil nitrogen levels are much lower, generally too low to support
 vigorous growth.  Second,  soil nitrogen can directly alter the amount of nitrogen metabolism
 within the  shoot and leaves.
     The absorption of nitrogen from the soil is not strictly proportional to the amount of
 nitrogen present.  The rate of absorption is hyperbolic with amount (Figure 9-17), also see
 Penning de Vries, 1982).  More nitrogen in the soil is not mirrored directly by more nitrogen
 uptake except at low levels (see also Chapter 10). Transport,  in general, is by carriers or.
 active transport and so its rate can be saturated (see Glass et al., 1990; Siddiqi et al., 1990).
 Although space does not permit a complete discussion, detailed reports are given in  Durzan
and Steward (1983); Hayes (1986); and Goh and Hayes (1986). Many of the past
experiments performed on the competition of soil nitrogen and NOx-derived nitrogen do not
fully appreciate these facts.  The soil level is often much too high and the added NOX causes
       August 1991
                                         9-140
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                       Biomass
                                       (tha")
           300       200
           N in fertilizer
           (kg ha")
                                                                     200
                                                             Absorbed N
                                                                 (kg ha")
                                       300
                                      N in fertilizer
                                      (kgha-i)
2
3
4
5
6
Figure 9-17. The relationship between applied nitrogen, soil nitrogen, and biomass
            production for a C4 grass.  (Taken from Penning de Vries, 1982). Nu is
            the nitrogen absorbed from the unfertilized soil and r is the recovery
            fraction of the fertilizer nitrogen.
      August 1991
                                     9-141
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 only small changes in growth or total nitrogen. For example, few changes are obtained in
 bean growth experiments with soil nitrate levels of 10-20 mM (Srivastava and Ormrod,
 1986).

 9.7.4.3  Transport of Nitrogen Species
     Weak acids move into cells or organelles by anion transporters or by diffusion of the
 uncharged acid form through the membrane.  Weak bases move by the same general
 mechanisms using  cation transporters or diffusion of the uncharged base form (Figure 9-18).
 The carrier/transporters use energy  to move the ions by either using the ionic gradients of the
 same-charge species (counter-transport) or the reverse-charge species (co-transport), or using
           *
 the energy contained in a high-energy phosphate bond (e.g., via H+-specific ATPase,  see
 Briston et al.,  1987).  Uncharged species diffusion is generally less rapid than an
 energy-driven  transport process.  Under certain pH gradients, however, or if the transporter
 is lacking, it can be very effective;  for example, the uncoupling of chloroplast
 photophosphorylation by ammonia (Walker and Crofts, 1970).
     The formulation of how pH will affect the accumulation of the species has been
 previously given (Heath and Leech, 1978), but will be repeated here in abbreviated form.
 For a weak acid [HNO3], the equilibrium condition, Ka  = [H+][NO2~] / [HNO2], exists on
 both sides of the membrane (sides 1 and 2). The concentration of HNO2 is the  same on both
 sides since it is uncharged and can diffuse rapidly through the membrane.  Thus, equilibrium
 means:
                          = [H+]2 [N0212
                                                              (6)
     For the weak base [NH3], the equilibrium condition of Kb = [H+] [NH3] / [NH4+]
likewise holds on both sides of the membrane. Here the concentration of NH3 is the same on
both sides, since it is uncharged and can diffuse rapidly (Crofts, 1967). The equilibrium
condition then gives rise to:
[NH4+]2  =
                                           +
                                         [H]2
(7)
       August 1991
                                        9-142
                               DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
            NH4+ =  H+ +     NHs    ===     NH3    + H+  =   NH4+
            NCV +  H+ =  HNOc
                   side 1
HNO2  -  H+
         side 2
                                                                  NO
 i
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Figure 9-18. Schematic of the distribution of a weak base or acid across a biological
            membrane.  The two sides are indicated across the membrane, represented
            as a vertical line. The concentration of the uncharged species is the same
            on both sides (See Walker and Crofts, 1970).  In other words, the
            diffusion of uncharged species is fast enough to maintain a chemical
            potential equilibrium.
     For example, the plasma membrane separates a wall region, which is estimated to be at
a pH of about 4.3, from the cytoplasm, which is maintained at a pH of about 7.  From the
above formulas, we can estimate that, if the total concentration of (HNO2 + NO2") within
the wall is 1 mM, the concentration of HNO2 is 91 fjiM. In the cytoplasm the concentration
of HNO2 is still only 91 pcM (the same as in the wall region).   However, in the cytoplasm
the concentration of nitrite will be about 46 mM (500 times larger) due to the unequal pH.
The total concentration of total nitrite will thus be high, even in the absence of  a nitrite
carrier.
     The same argument can be used for a weak base; however, between the wall/cytoplasm
membrane there is no accumulation but rather an exclusion of the base. Since the Ka for
ammonia is very basic, little NH3 exists in the wall region (actually about 5 nM). With the
same 1 mM total ammonium species outside in the wall, the value of NH4+ within the
cytoplasm becomes only 5 /xM and  so the total is slightly above 5 /jM (compared with 1 mM
outside). However, as the total ammonium inside rises, the ammonium outside would rise
even more rapidly (for 0.5 mM inside, the outside would be nearly 0.5 M), leading to a path
for rapid loss of ammonium  from the cells.
       August 1991
                                       9-143      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
      There seems to exist in the roots a transporter for ammonia that ensures a steady supply
 of NH4+ internally so that uncharged-species diffusion plays only a small role.  This is not
 the case for chloroplasts where the NH3 can easily be accumulated in the grana space, which
 is quite acidic relative to the stroma space; there the high concentration of NH3 can function
 as an uncoupler (Walker and Crofts,  1970).

 9.7.4.4  Role of Cellular pH
      The above arguments are critical for understanding how nitrogen species can move
 through biological organisms.  Ammonium can accumulate in spaces of low pH, while nitrite
 can accumulate in spaces of high pH  (compared with neighboring spaces).  This is not true
 for strong acids  such as nitric acid, which in biological organisms is completely dissociated to
 nitrate. Both nitrogen compounds are acids, and their formation can distort normal internal
 pH if they are present in high concentrations (see Raven, 1988). The actual change in pH
 depends upon their concentration and the buffering capacity of the organelle or tissue space.
      For example, NOX could form about 0.05 N H+  upon  its conversion to nitrate  and
 nitrite at an atmospheric concentration of 0.1 ppm (see above).  In a wall of about 0.5 jum
 thickness, this would be 2.5 X 10"9 equ/cm2 wall.  Moorvan et al. (1979) measured  only
 about 7.5 X  1010 equ/cm2 wall H+-buffering sites.  These unbuffered, accumulated  acids
 would then lower the pH of the wall region.  This acidification would tend to loosen the wall
 and allow the cell to expand uncontrolled by the cell (Taiz, 1984; Lutten et al., 1990)  Once
 these acids are inside the cell, their metabolism and conversion to ammonium ion seems to be
 a different story.
     A largely unproven hypothesis is that the accumulation  of NO2 from the atmosphere
 with a concurrent conversion into HNO2 and HNO3 would change the acidity of the leaf.
 Raven (1988) has theoretically examined the accumulation of nitrogen from several sources,
 including ammonium and nitrate from the roots, and ammonium nitrate (dry deposition) and
NOX from the atmosphere into the leaves. He concluded that pH balance by the cell  is
 difficult under many conditions, but that NOX accumulation leads to an excess of H+ of only
0.22 mol/mol N. He  argues that uptake of phosphate and sulfur with conversion of
ammonium into amino acids interact to keep this number small. This is not true for ammonia
uptake, which is able to produce a large number of excess H+.
       August 1991
                                        9-144
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1          Okano and Totsuka (1986) have shown that at 2 ppm NO2 the amount of N
 2     accumulated from NO2 in sunflower is roughly 7.2 x  10~10 mol N/g FW sec"1.  Using
 3     Raven's number from above, there is about 2.4 X  10~7 N H+ produced per second due to
 4     the uptake of NO2.  The concentration of organic acids within the vacuole is about 250 mM
 5     (Lin et al., 1977) with a buffer capacity of about 140 (change in salt concentration per
 6     change in pH [Bull,  1970]).  Within the vacuole at pH 4, the rate of H+ produced due to the
 7     above  uptake of NO2 would have to be maintained constantly for over 1.5 h in order to lower
 8     the pH by only 0.3 pH units.  This is such a slight disturbance because the N source is so
 9     weak.  More research needs to be done with nitrogen-deficient soils and plants to measure
10     more precisely these pH effects.  It remains true, however, that any shift in pH in the
11     cytoplasm could alter the rate of formation of several metabolites since many enzymatic
12     reactions are highly sensitive to pH.
13
14     9.7.4.5 Reductases
15          Once formed, nitrate will feed into the general nitrate pool in the leaf, which is derived
16     from the root by transport via the xylem water stream.  This xylem water stream, in turn, is
17     driven largely by transpiration through the stomate and, therefore, the stomatal aperture can
18     partially control the movement of nitrate. Nitrate from the xylem is contained within the
19     wall and must move into the cytoplasm to be converted to NO2" by nitrate reductase.  This
20     enzyme can be rapidly induced to high activity upon exposure to nitrate (Woodin et al.,
21     1985). Typical enzymatic parameters of this reductase are listed in Table 9-13.  NADH from
22     respiration (and glycolysis) drives the reduction of nitrate to nitrite within the cytoplasm.
23     Thus,  rapid nitrate reduction would be expected to induce higher respiration rates, which are
24     measured under some circumstances (Aslam et al., 1987; Bloom et al., 1989).
25          Both atmosphere-derived nitrite and nitrite from the roots add to the cytoplasmic  pool,
26     from which nitrite moves into the chloroplast by a presumed carrier molecule. Nitrite would
27     not be expected to move passively into the chloroplast since the internal pH of the chloroplast
28     stroma is higher than that of the cytoplasm (at about 8 to 8.5 when the leaf is illuminated,  see
29     arguments above).  Normally, nitrite is reduced by a 6-electron process via photosynthesis.
30     Although the evidence is somewhat contradictory (see Robinson, 1988, and Kaiser and
31     Foerster,  1989), the demand for these electrons does not seem to inhibit or  slow CO2 fixation
        August 1991
9-145
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     except at high levels of light or low CO2 levels where the CO2" fixation process is nearly
  2     saturated (Pace et al.,  1990).  Typical enzymatic parameters of this reductase are also listed
  3     in Table 9-13. In darkness nitrite can not be reduced and so its concentration can rise to high
  4     levels if the rate of nitrate reduction is maintained.  Taylor  (1973) suggested that this was the
  5     reason for the production of large amounts of visible injury by NOX in low light or darkness.
  6          Nitrite seems to be regulated to remain at a low level within cells.  At high levels nitrite
  7     is toxic  and could alter the photosynthetic process by altering the pH of the stroma of the
  8     chloroplast and so inhibiting normal CO2 fixation (Brunswick and Cresswell,  1988a, b).
  9     High concentrations of ammonia are also toxic. Ammonia acts as an uncoupler of
 10     photophosphorylation.  Thus, a critical limit in. concentration must exist for both molecules
 11     for normal cells. While Table 9-13 can give an estimate of what that limit may be by using
 12     the Km of each enzyme system, more experimentation on actual concentrations is needed.
 13     For example,  the decline in both growth and photosynthesis (nearly 50%) in radish occurs
 14     when the level of ammonium within the plant rises above a  certain amount upon the use of
 15     ammonia as a fertilizer (2,000 ppm, 0.2% of the dry weight; Goyal et al.,  1982). Nitrate
 16     fertilizer does not cause such a rise  in ammonia (200 ppm) nor a decline in photosynthesis
 17     and growth; metabolites derived from nitrate seem to be well regulated under most
 18     circumstances.
 19         If nitrate is added to the ammonia  fertilizer (at 10%  of ammonium), the level of
20     ammonia within the  plant remains low (200-600 ppm); again nitrate metabolites aid in the
21     regulation of ammonia levels (Goyal et al., 1982).  Under these conditions, the internal
22     concentration of nitrate remains low—at  about 500 ppm—for ammonia fertilizer.  However,
23     the internal concentration rises to  14,500 ppm with nitrate fertilizer alone. These numbers
24     reflect the level of nitrate and ammonium within the radish plants best defined as "normal".
25     The internal nitrate level can rise  without problems if the  ammonium concentration is held
26     low, while a rise of  the ammonium  level induces toxic effects,  such as a decline in
27     photosynthesis.  These interactions may  help to link the apparent toxic effects caused by NOX
28     exposure to excess accumulation of partially reduced forms of NOX (see later sections).
29
       August 1991
9-146
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   TABLE 9-13.  ENZYME PARAMETERS FOR CRITICAL ENZYMATIC STEPS
        _   IN PLANT USE OF NITROGEN COMPOUNDS   _

       and Vmax are the Michaelis-Menten parameters for each enzyme system, even though
some enzyme systems listed here do not strictly behave according to these kinetics.)

A.  Nitrate Transporter in Root Membranes. (Kinetic parameters of the enzyme located
    on the plasma membrane of root cells to transport NO3" inward [Siddiqui et al.,  1990].)
      Vmax:  0.3-3  Mmol/gFWh
         : 60-100
                               -l
B.  Nitrate Reductase, (Molybdenum protein associated with electron transport chain
    [Hageman and Hucklesby, 1971].)
           NAD(P)H = NO2 + H20 + NAD(P)
   vmax'


NO/
NADPH
NADH
             3 - 5 /miol/g FW h
                             '1
                             4,500
                                15
                                 9
C.  Nitrite Reductase. (Enzyme associated with ferredoxin within the photosynthetic
    electron transport chain [Losada and Paneque, 1977; Wellburn, 1990].)
    NO
        (Fd)red  =
(Fd)oxid
      V   •  3 - 5 jwmol/g FW If1
    Ferredoxin (Fd)
    N02-
                            10
                           100
D, Glutamine Synthetase. (Enzyme within plant tissue [Durzan and Steward, 1983].)
    Glutamate + NH3 + ATP = Glutamine + ADP + Pi
      v   •  5.4 - 9.9 ^mol/g FW h
    Glutamate
    NH3
    ATP
                                -l
                        3,000-12,000
                           10-20
                          100-1,000
August 1991
                                  9-147
                    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   TABLE 9-13 (Cont'd). ENZYME PARAMETERS FOR CRITICAL ENZYMATIC
                STEPS IN PLANT USE OF NITROGEN COMPOUNDS	

 E. Glutamate Synthetase. (Mitochondria! enzyme [Durzan and Steward,  1983].)
    Glutamine = Oxoglutaric Acid + NAD(P)H = 2 Glutamate = NAD(P)"
       V™: 1.8 - 3.6 janol/g FW h"1
    Glutamine
    Oxoglutarate
    NAD(P)H
300-1,500
 40-600
  7-30
 F.  Amino Transferase. (Enzyme system occurring in several organelles of the cell.)
    Oxaloacetate + Glutamate = Oxoglutarate = Asparate
    I^ (acids) =  1 -40 mM
 G. Asparagine Synthetase.
    Asparate + Glutamine/NH3 + ATP = Asparagine + Glutamate + ATP + P-P/EUO
    Asparate
    Glutamine
    (NH3)
 0.7-2
 0.1-1
 2.0-9
H. Chloroplast Amino Acid/Organic Acid Transporter.  (Enzyme located on chloroplast
    envelope to exchange amino acids and organic acids [Woo et al., 1987].)
    V   • 80 - 100 /zmole/g FW h
                               -1
9.7.4.6  Amine Metabolism

    The metabolic pathway of nitrogen in the chloroplast is summarized in Figure 9-19.

Three major sections of the metabolism are apparent:  (1) reduction of the oxidized forms of

NOX to ammonium (previously discussed), (2) conversion of free ammonium into an amino

group of an amino acid, and (3) movement of that amino acid into proteins or the nitrogen
groups of other metabolites (such as polyamines).
August 1991
         9-148     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
          TRIOSE ®-«
      Figure 9-19.  A generalized pathway of amino acid biosynthesis involving the chloroplast
                   within the leaf.  Abbreviations are: RuBP, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate;
                   PGA, 3-phosphoglyceric acid; Fd, ferredoxin; a-oxo-glut, a-oxo-glutarate;
                   glut-NH2, glutamine; Ala, alanine; asp, aspartic acid; OAA, oxalacetic
                   acid; PEP, phosphopyruvic acid; Pyr, pyruvic acid; triose-P, triose
                   phosphate (either dihydroxyacetone phosphate or glyceraldehyde
                   3-phosphate).
1

2

3

4

5
     The photosynthetic process generates ammonia which is, as has been noted;'closely

regulated by the cell (Rhodes et al., 1976).  The conversion of ammonium into an amino

group keeps the concentration of ammonia low and is carried out by the glutamate cycle

coupling the equations shown under D and E in Table 9-13:
      August 1991
                                        9-149
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
           NH4+ + glutamate + oxoglutarate + ATP + NADPH =
           2 glutamate + ADP + Pi + NADP+
                              (14)
 The reducing power comes from photosynthetically produced NADPH.  The amine nitrogen
 on glutamate of this system can be coupled to the conversion of pyruvate to alanine and
 glycoxylate to glycine (Chapman and Leech, 1979). These amino acids and organic acids can
 be transported into and out of the chloroplast by specific transporters located on the
 chloroplast envelope (Woo et al.,  1987). The rate of transport seems to be fast enough to
 move the carbon and nitrogen metabolites to and out of the cytoplasm with little problem, but
 is limited in its absolute speed.  Once in the cytoplasm the amino group can be used in many
 ways to form other secondary products and proteins and will not be further discussed (see
 Pate, 1983; Durzan and Steward,  1983).
     For the most part these amine interconversions (Table 9-13) can move the amine group
 rapidly between the metabolites.  There is the possibility, however, of the formation of
 "bottlenecks" in that movement if the system becomes overloaded with nitrogen (Ito et al.,
 1984b). The concentrations of metabolites due to any overload should indicate at what point
 the concentration of external NOX would become toxic to the plant. Under those conditions,
 the excess nitrogen supplied by NOX cannot be incorporated into  metabolism without
 biochemical disruptions.
9.8   REGULATORY MAINTENANCE OF REDUCED NITROGEN
      COMPOUNDS (DETOXIFICATION)
     As summarized above, NOX exposure can overload the nitrogen metabolism pathways,
as seen in Figure 9-16 in which key features in the changes in normal plant growth occurring
upon exposure to NOX are noted.  Unfortunately, most of the studies made on plants exposed
to NOX have not traced the inhibition or stimulation of these pathways, but rather have
looked for visible injury or change in gross productivity (measured by several possible
methods). A summary of such investigations was made in the previous NOX criteria
document (U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency, 1982) and is reproduced in Figure 9-20.
The curves in the figure represent envelopes of the studies where either (A) metabolic and
       August 1991
                                       9-150
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                 0.01
            0.1
 Days
1.0
                   10
                                                               100
       1000^
        100 —
    I
    O
     §
     8
    o
         1.0	
         0.1
                                                                        = 1000
                            Death
                                                        =^100
     \
Metabolicand
      \    growth
                                effects
         Threshold for
         foliar lesions
                                                               E
                                                               "TO
                                       o
                                       I

                                       I
                                   10  i
                                        
-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
31
 growth effects or (B) visible injury patterns (threshold for foliar lesions) were noted for a
 given duration of NO2 exposure (abscissa) at a given concentration (ordinate).  The lowest
 curve on the plot indicates where major alterations in plant metabolism occur (largely
 undefined, but most studies used an inhibition of photosynthesis as the marker).  The region
 of the figure below this curve is where NO2 does not affect plant metabolism.  A second
 region in the figure exists between this curve and the next higher curve in which disturbances
 in metabolism and growth occur (the plant is not normal) but tissue death is not observed.
 Exposures at levels and duration in a third region above this curve ("threshold for foliar
 lesion") results in cell or  tissue death (foliar lesions). At very short durations and very high
 exposure concentration, plant death occurs.  Although not shown on this curve, there is a
 poorly-defined region where growth stimulation can occur with NO2 exposure for some plants
 under some conditions (see next section).  It is important to note that the NO2 concentration -
 necessary to induce any changes is non-linearly dependent upon the duration of exposure.
      Under some stresses, such as radiation, the exposure (concentration multiplied by time)
 defines injury levels.  For a given exposure (high concentration for a short time or a low
 concentration for a long time), the injury is the same.  On Figure 9-20 that curve would be a
 straight line of unity slope on the graph. Clearly this exposure concept is not useful here.
 The boundaries between the regions are curved.  Explanation for these curved boundaries is
 unknown.  Understanding of the metabolic events surrounding NOX conversion into
 metabolically active amines may help in discovering that explanation.

 9.8.1  NOX Incorporation with Non-toxic Effects
     If the flow of nitrate from the roots is limiting initially (and hence the plant's growth
 rate was low), then the nitrate from NOX will be beneficial.  That nitrate-N will stimulate
 both NH4+ and amino acid production (Koch et al., 1988).  Higher levels of amino acids
 will stimulate protein formation and thus growth.  ^However,  if the level of nitrate from the
 roots is adequate at the beginning, the added NOX will shift normal relationships away from
 the optimum. In either case the normal state of the plant will have been disturbed (Van
Keulenetal., 1989).
     It is useful to return  to Figure 9-20 to examine in more detail the relationships between
concentration and duration of exposure  and the formation of toxic effects such as altered
       August 1991
                                         9-152      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
 30
 31
metabolism and foliar injury. The curves can be broken into two sections easily in which the
relation between duration and concentration is nearly linear.  Only the curve which marks the
beginning of threshold foliar injury will be examined.  The first section (Section A) extends
from about 0.13 to 0.78 hours (8 to 47 minutes) and has a very steep slope.  The second
section (Section B) extends from about 3 h to 14 days and has a relatively shallow slope.
     Following the discussion in the main body of the chapter, these two sections can be
separately fitted to a power-law relationship such as:
                        Cn x T = t>r
                              (15)
where C is the external concentration in ppm, T is the time in hours, and D0 and n are
constants.  This  formula is fitted to the curves and the following values for each section for
the constants are found to be:
Section
A
B
Time region
15-50 min
3 h - 14 days
nCpower)
0.30
2.90
Do
1.6
55.4
      Section A represents very high levels of NO2, which occur infrequently in nature.
 While it may be interesting to discuss that section, such an endeavor will not foster an
 understanding of the problems that occur under natural levels of N02-  At very high levels of
 NO2 the rate at which the NO2 can enter  the tissue water and be converted into nitrate/nitrite
 is very limited. In Section A, then, the concentration of internal NOX would be expected to
 be very near that of the outside.  In other words, the stomates are probably not limiting the
 reaction rates unless they are closed.  However, for both sections of the curve  the flux rate
 and the amount of nitrogen which enters the plant could be determined with  proper
 measurements.                             ,
      For the longer time periods at concentrations presently occurring within the environment
 (Section B), the flow of NOX into the cells is high enough to lower the internal NOX
        August 1991
                                          9-153
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
concentrations (relative to the external value).  Under these'conditions the external levels
would not well match the reactions which are observed; the internal levels may be very low
and stomatal aperture would influence reactions greatly.  The ability of the plant to utilize the
nitrite and ammonia formed would be the governing mechanism of detoxification within this
time scale of days to weeks.
     For time periods of an hour or greater, the flow through the stqmate and pools of
metabolites should have stabilized to a nearly steady-state level, and also the activity of
inducible reductase enzymes should have begun to rise.  The major question then becomes
whether the plant can handle the total increased flow of nitrogen.  Calculations of existing
data show that the flow of nitrogen from NOX is near that of the highest flow of nitrogen
which can be used by the plant, especially if it has a source of nitrogen from the roots. One
of the more critical steps is the flow rate of nitrogen into and out of the ammonia pool. If
the flow of nitrogen into that pool exceeds the flow out, many metabolites, including
ammonia, will increase and so force the cell to near its toxic point.
     For much lower exposures and longer  durations, however, the question of limitations
becomes whether the plant can find some method to use the accumulated nitrogen
(now converted to amino acids and proteins).  That problem reduces to how  fast the plant can
grow.  A typical value of nitrogen within a  plant is about 1 % of the dry weight (levels of
2-3%  are at the high end of the scale).  Therefore, injury at low levels of NOX over many
days of exposure would be predicted to be observed only when the plant simply cannot grow
fast enough to use all of the excess accumulated nitrogen (van Keulen et al., 1989).
     The above arguments give a rationale for  the shape of the curve in Figure 9-20.
However, the exact shape will depend greatly upon the species, growing conditions, gas
exchange, and enzymological parameters^ The above hypothesis should aid in understanding
critical sites within the plant for study and for setting standards.  Different parts of the plant's
growth cycle are important through these .different exposure time scales.  The plant should be
able to tolerate different concentrations and  flow rates at different developmental times.
        August 1991
                                        9-154
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      9.9  TOXIC REACTIONS IN THE TISSUES
 2           The most obvious sign that NOX exposure is exceeding the ability of the plant to
 3      assimilate the extra nitrogen is the appearance of visible injury on the leaf surface.
 4      Unfortunately,  each air pollutant does not induce a specific,  characteristic, visible signature.
 5      For the most part, visible injury patterns consist of localized chlorotic spots, which in the
 6      presence of light and with time develop into a necrotic section between the veins. Tip and
 7      margin injury is more  extensive than injury across the leaf.  These injured regions are where
 8      the maximum air flow occurs and the boundary layer resistance to flow is much smaller.
 9      Higher air exchange would increase the pollutant dose.  The tissue next to the larger veins
10     remains, apparently untouched until much of the leaf is destroyed, perhaps due to the plant's
11     -' ability to export the excess nitrogen through the veins to other portions.  Other evidence of
12     injury is early  senescence or leaf drop, as if the aging processes within the leaf have been
13     accelerated.  Little is'known about these processes.  Under conditions where nitrogen is
14     limiting to the plant, the initial coloration pattern may be just the opposite—an increase in
15     greening.  In monocotyledonous plants, the blade possesses  different developmental ages
16     along its length; but the transport vessels extend longitudinally.  Thus, specific regions of
17   ;  injury along the blade would not be uncommon if the export of nitrogen near an individual
18     transport vessel is made critical.   Also, cells which have just completed their development are
 19     most sensitive; again these are the cells in which nitrogen metabolism is most strained.
20      Excess nitrogen could push the cells into nitrogen toxicity through an excess of nitrite or
21      ammonia.                           ~
22                                                    '           '   "   '    ••
 23      9.9.1  Concept of Exposure Index
 24  '         Data presented previously (in Figure 9-20) clearly showed that the concept of dose
 25      (concentration x exposure time) is not valid, as the effects of NO2 are decidedly nonlinear.
 26     Most of the.exposure data presented in Table 9-3 have been discussed in Section 9.4.  It
 27     would be useful to update the data in Figure 9-20 using all of the observations from
 28     Table 9-3.  Yet, there is so much narrative in  the table that to summarize the effects easily is
 29     difficult.  The majority of the observed effects, however, fall into three categories:  (1) no
 30     change or effect; (2)  slight increase in mass of the plant or portions of the plant; and
 31     (3) decrease in mass of the plant or portions of the plant.  Those plants  for which no effects
         August 1991
9-155
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
 are noted must be tolerant of the excess nitrogen from NOX or able to exclude NO .  Those
 plants which increase in mass are often those which are suffering from a nitrogen deficiency
 and so, not surprisingly, they grow better under conditions closer to their nitrogen optimum.
 The more important category is that in which productivity is lowered.  Productivity loss is
 generally due to a loss of carbon fixation if the other nutrients are present in correct
 abundances (Sinn  and PeU, 1984).  There is little evidence that NOX exposure causes nutrient
 shifts for other than nitrogen; however, few investigations have addressed that issue.
 Nitrogen toxicity has been linked to Ca+2 and K+ imbalances (Goh and Hayes, 1986;
 Touraine et al., 1988).  Future research should be focused upon that area.
     A simplistic, but useful, approach to determine what type of exposure index
 (a combination of duration and concentration) could be used is to transform the narrative in
 Table 9-3 (Section 9.4.2) into a gross quantitative measure of (a) no effect,  (b) decrease, or
 (c) increase in some measure of productivity, without regard to the actual type of
 measurement.  Similarly, the duration can be classed as number of  days of exposure,  without
 regard to the fine  details of hours/day or number of days per week.  Naturally, this approach
 loses information but it has the benefit of allowing a tabulation of effects to determine
 whether there are definite levels of exposure which will lead to toxic injury.  It must be noted
 that even if the details are examined in the table, there are too many variables mentioned or
 determined, such as humidity, light intensity, soil water potential, and tissue or soil nitrogen,
 to allow a coherent detailed understanding of the conditions leading to toxicity.  Furthermore,
 an examination of the data  will indicate  that some plants were exposed under higher than
 normal levels of CO2. Again, these parameters will alter the production of toxic  symptoms,
 but the attempt to  obtain a broader picture of exposure eliminates any focus  on the details.
     Diagrams of  such tabulations are presented in Figure 9-21, along the lines of
 Figure 9-20,  as log (concentration) versus log (duration). The data indicating a decline in
 some measures of productivity are shown in Figure 9-21 A, as a "scattergram".  There are
 several points of interest. The data seem to  indicate that as the duration of exposure
lengthens, the concentration required to cause some decrease in productivity  declines.  Hence,
exposure for a day to 1 ppm is somewhat equivalent to 0.1 ppm for a month. The figure
also shows a linear fit to the data with a slope of 1.7 ± 0.2; again indicating a nonlinear
       August 1991
                                         9-156
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
            (A)  .5.0

                -5.5

                -6.0
              ZF

              !"
                -7.0

                -7.5

                -8.0
                           Decline In Productivity
 -1

1hr.
                   0
                  meas.
                  Iday
                                     o nU i
                                              (B)
                                                                   No Change In Productivity
                     OSppni
                                     cate.
                                  2v*» Imo.      lyear

                             0.02 ppm  0.1 ppm  0.02 ppm
                                         •5.4


                                         -5.8


                                       §" -6.2


                                       jf .4.6


                                         -7.0


                                         -7.4


                                         -7.8
-1  -o.e  -02  02  o.«  1   1.4  i.e  22
            Log [days]
        D meas.      	calc.
                                  (C)
                                                 Increase In Productivity
                                       •6.0

                                       •SA

                                       -5.8

                                       -6.2

                                       -6.8

                                       -7.0

                                       -7A

                                       -7.8
                                                0       1       2
                                                     Log [days]
                                                B rneas.      	calc.
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

17

18

19
Figure 9-21. Diagram of studies of NOX on plant productivity. This figure is similar to
             Figure 9-20; however, separate experiments are shown by individual
             symbols as a function of log (concentration of NO2) and log(duration of
             exposure).  The data are from Table 9-3.  All the data in each sub-figure
             were fitted to a linear curve by least squares. Numbers below the curve
             are minimum values of concentrations reported in the indicated time
             interval.  The three separate figures are for:  (A, top) Decline in
             productivity (exponent=2.7±0.2; ^=0.200; n=87); (B, middle) No
             observed effect upon productivity (exponent=1.7±0.2; ^=0.200; n=87);
             (C, bottom) Increase hi productivity (exponent=2.1±0.4; ^=0.200;
             n=87). The measure of productivity ranged from leaf and root growth
             and early senescence to  flower/seed production.
dependence of dose (time X concentration).  Furthermore, the line below the axis label

shows the lowest measured concentration within the varied time intervals for which a decline

in productivity was noted.  For durations of a day or longer a decline is noted for

concentrations of 0.02 to 0.1 ppm.
        August 1991
                                         9-157
                                          DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
     Date for which no observed effect was noted are given in Figure 9-2 IB and show less
dependence upon concentration.  Again the data can be fitted to a line with a slope of
2.7 Jr 0.6.  Here the maximum concentration for which there was no effect is shown below
the x-axis. For durations of exposure above a day, concentrations as high as 2.1 ppni have
been used without an effect being observed.
     Data for which a stimulation of some measure of productivity exist are presented in
Figure 9-21C.  There are fewer examples from the literature, but fitting the data to a line
gives a slope above unity of 2.1.+ 0.4.  The minimum values here indicate that exposures to
0.1 ppm NOX of a day to 2 weeks can cause an increase while for longer exposures (greater
than one month),  increases can be induced by  as low as 0.024 ppm.
     Unfortunately, there are still no clear conclusions available from the data regarding
exposure indices.  There are, however, a few tentative concepts which can be stated from
these data sets.

     (1)    While there are no absolute limits, for the most part a lower concentration will
           cause some shift in productivity (higher or lower) with longer times of exposure.

     (2)    The concept of a strict dose (concentration x time) does not work.  The effects
           are decidedly nonlinear; the slopes of the Figures 9-20 and 9-21 suggest that it
           may be a power of 2 to 3 (see Equation 15).

     (3)    Under varied circumstances within the range of NO2 exposure given in Figure
           9-21,  a given species will be either affected or not affected by NO2.  Not enough
           is known to determine precisely when a plant will be altered by the exposure.

     (4)    The majority of the data in Figure 9-21A and 9-21B suggest that concentrations
           below 0.1 ppm for days to a month have little effect upon productivity.  The data
           are less clear for very long exposures; it may be that very low concentrations   ;
           over a year's exposure may be enough to cause ecological problems.  The lack of
           data make any conclusion premature.
       August 1991
                                        9-158     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      9.9.2  Inhibited Processes
 2       i    As previously stated, excess nitrate causes little injury to the plant; however, excess
 3      nitrite,and ammonia can alter photosynthesis, therefore, one area of toxicity.may be in the
 4      buildup of these compounds and their inhibition of photosynthetic processes. Nitrate is
 5      routinely used to poison the H+-ATPase on the tonoplast but at a level of about 40 mM
 6      (O'Neil et al.,  1983, K£ = 10 mM), while ammonia in a concentration of tens of micromolar
 7      can uncouple photophosphorylation (Walker and Crofts, 1970).  Although nitrate can build to
 8      high levels, this may be an indication of the limitation on nitrate metabolism,
 9           Nitrite also appears to alter the ability for a pH gradient to develop properly within the
10     chloroplast (via light-driven electron transport; Heath and Leech,  1978); and without the pH
11      gradient, the ATP, production as well as normal carbon fixation is severely-limited, thus
12     inhibiting photosynthesis. Under high light or saturating CO2, nitrite can intercept electrons
13     and so inhibit NADPH used for CO2 fixation.  Under most conditions some believe that
14     nitrogen reduction does not directly compete for reducing equivalences and so would not slow
15      CO2 fixation.  One of the best hypotheses for nitrite-induced injury is the alteration of normal
16      pH within varied organelles of the cell; however, this area has not received much study,
17      although the hypothesis seems to be a reasonable one.
18          Excess ammonia is injurious to living cells, and plants attempt to regulate its level
19      metabolically.   When regulation fails, tissue "burn" is common and may also be traced to pH
20      imbalance.  Here again the linkage between tissue ammonia and NOX exposure has not been
21      established by research.
22   -        NO2 appears not to cause injury directly because of its conversion into the salts of
23      oxidized nitrogen. There is little information regarding the actual speed of these reactions in
 24      water solutions and how biochemical ions and compounds  could alter that speed.
 25      Furthermore, these reactions most probably are occurring within the cell wall area and,
 26      therefore, surface effects which are largely unknown at the present time are expected to play
 27      a major role.  Most of the chemical studies which indicate that NO2 can react with double
 28      bonds of fatty acids are done in organic or non-polar solutions.   The majority of these highly
 29      reactive compounds behave differently in polar solvents.
 30          NO is even a more enigmatic species.  Its  solubility  indicates that it does not react
 31      rapidly with water to form nitrite. There is apparently no good measurement of internal NO,
         August 1991
9-159      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     but it is presumed to be nearly that of the external value.  Most of the chemical studies of
  2     NO which indicate that it reacts rapidly with free radicals have been carried out in non-polar
  3     solvents and are, therefore, suspect.  To be sure, there are many biochemical reactions which
  4     occur via free radicals and so NO could easily react with free .radicals and alter normal
  5     metabolism. Yet under most conditions these critical free radical reactions are heavily
  6     protected or tightly bound within enzymes.  It may be that only at high levels is there enough
  7     free NO present to initiate these damaging reactions.  It is hard to calculate what the level of
  8     NO would have to be in the atmosphere to build reactive conditions of NO within the cell
  9     water since there are so many unknowns.
 10          Like nitrite, NO can alter photosynthesis. The inhibition of photosynthesis by NO
 11     seems to require time to build. In one study (Bruggink et al., 1988), no effect of NO on
 12     photosynthesis was observed until after 2 days of exposure for 8 h/day at 1 ppm NO.
 13     Interestingly, the inhibition was only seen in the afternoon at first, when levels of sugars are
 14     high and the level of photosynthesis in the control was declining.  Also of interest is the
 15     apparent increase in stomatal conductance induced initially by NO (1 ppm increases  the
 16     conductance by about 15-30%).  Since the internal NO level is estimated to be high, this
 17     small amount of increase would not greatly change the nitrite within the tissues. However,
 18     the decline in photosynthesis is not linked to lower conductance. A rise in conductance is
 19     sometimes observed with SO2 exposure and has been linked to altered guard cell metabolism,
20     possibly through a reaction with the membranes, which in turn would alter the normal
21     relationship between the guard and epidermal cells (Mansfield and McCune, 1988).  Yet an
22     increase in transpiration is not commonly observed with NOX fumigations.   An increase in
23     transpiration may be only transitory and under most cases NOX alters the ionic relationships
24     between the epidermis and guard cells to the extent that the stomate closes.  Certainly at high
25     levels of NOX exposure transpiration declines.
26         It has been argued that  only low concentrations of NOX  should be used in air quality
27     research.  Unfortunately, under this scenario the mechanisms  of toxicity cannot be well
28     investigated and so exactly what may be happening at other levels of NOX is difficult to
29     understand.  Past studies indicate that the sugar levels within leaf tissues are being altered (Ito
30     et al., 1985). In some cases the levels decline, indicating that photosynthesis  has been
31     inhibited.  In the cases where the sugar levels  rise, translocation to other portions of the plant
       August 1991
9-160
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      may have been inhibited to a greater degree than photosynthesis, leading to a buildup of the
 2      soluble sugar pools.  Once translation into the root is limited, the growth of the root is
 3      inhibited. This uneven allocation of nutrients, in turn, alters root/shoot ratios. It has been
 4      observed that a lowered level of sugar within the root leads to a demise of nitrogen-fixing
 5      nodules (Srivastava and Ormrod, 1986).
 6           Chemical evidence favors lipid damage by NOX. If direct lipid alteration occurred
 7      within the membranes, the membrane function would drastically decline.  Ions and
 8      metabolites would leak out and metabolism would be altered detrimentally. Changes in the
 9      osmotic relation between the varied cell types may be a consequence of these reactions.
10     Little direct evidence has been observed for NOX; however, lipid synthesis has been observed
11      to be inhibited by high levels of NOX (Malhatra and Khan, 1984).  This may be, however,
12     due to lowered metabolism in general.
13          Histologically, cells exposed to large amounts of NOX exhibit disruption of organelles
14     which appears to be ionically or osmotically induced. If the pH of these organelles is greatly
15     altered by NO2" or NH3,  ion pumping will be changed and the balance.of these ions greatly
16     altered. Certainly there is no real evidence that disruption of some ionic concentrations occurs
17     (Wellburn,  1985), but further understanding of the ionic balances is needed.
18           In  general, most of the observations can be explained by a buildup of nitrite or
19     ammonia beyond normal levels.  The weak acid and base could then alter the normal pH
20     within each organelle, leading to an inhibition of the metabolism of that organelle.  Under
21     this concept, photosynthesis  is inhibited by the loss of the pH gradient and the ability to
22     produce ATP. In addition, having the wrong stomatal pH lowers the enzymic rate of carbon
23      and thus inhibits CO2 fixation.  If translation is inhibited to a larger degree by the altered
24      pH, the levels of soluble sugars could decline.  If translation is inhibited more than
25      photosynthesis, the levels of sugars rise since they  cannot be exported.  With a decline in
26      available export carbohydrates,  growth, fruit and seed productivity decline and root
27      metabolism is lowered. If energy becomes a problem within the roots, ion transport is
 28      inhibited and so nutrients could also be ultimately limited (Touraine et al., 1988).
 29                                      '
 30
        August 1991
9-161
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     9.9.3  Pollutants in Combination
  2          The data collected for pollutants in combination do not give a coherent picture. Under
  3     most cases, the experiments have been conducted under a very wide range of conditions,
  4     using relatively high concentrations for the most part.  Mechanistically, it is difficult to
  5     understand what is happening.  There are two major sources of interactions which are poorly
  6     understood: (1) the gaseous phase in which the pollutants can chemically alter one another to
  7     the extent that new combinations are made and (2)  the metabolic pathways in which activity
  8     in one particular pathway can lower the carbon and energy abilities for another.  The
  9     gas-phase chemistry must take into account the humidity both externally and within the leaf,
 10     especially at the wall surface. Little is known of the possible interactions there.
 11          The metabolic pathways can interact in ways that depend upon the nature of the
 12     pollutant and its interaction with the normal physiology.  For example, ozone is known to
 13     alter membrane permeability, which in turn lowers  the net metabolism of the cell (Heath,
 14     1980; 1988).  The loss of ions and energy alters  the ability of the cell to respond to changes
 15     in pH due to nitrogen transformations and  reduced nitrogen forms through NADH/NADPH
 16     processes. Metabolism of sulfur from SO2 requires both energy and carbon skeletons.  The
 17     processing of sulfur into amino acids will link directly to the formation of those compounds
 18     from nitrogen.  One expects interactions but how they will develop  is difficult to predict
 19     presently, since the interrelationships are many and currently difficult to model.
20          In any event, studies of co-occurrence of NO2/SO2 and NO2/O3  (Lefohn et al., 1984;
21      Lane and Bell, 1984; Jacobson and McManus, 1985; Lefohn et al.,  1987) concluded that
22     (a) the co-occurrence of two-pollutant mixtures lasted only a  few hours per  episode, (b) the
23      time between episodes is generally large (weeks,  sometimes months), and (c) the periods of
24     co-occurrence represent a very small portion of the  potential plant growing period.
25                                                                                         f
       August 1991
9-162
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1

 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26.
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
REFERENCES

Altshuller, A. P. (1956) Thermodynamic considerations in the interactions of nitrogen oxides and oxy-acids in
       the atmosphere. J. Air Pollut.  Control Assoc. 6: 97-100.    .:  %


American Phytopathological Society. (1974) Glossary of air pollution terms and selected reference list.
       Phytopathol. News 8: 5-8.

American Society for Testing of Materials. (1982) Sampling atmospheres to collect organic compounds and
       vapors (activated charcoal adsorption method).  ASTM standard number D 3686.


Amthor,  J. S. (1989) Respiration and crop productivity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.


Amundson, R. G.; MacLean, D. C. (1982) Influence of oxides  of nitrogen on crop growth and yield: an
       overview. In: Schneider, T.; Grant, L., eds. Air pollution by nitrogen oxides: proceedings of the
       US-Dutch international symposium; May; Maastricht, The Netherlands. Amsterdam, The Netherlands:
       Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company; pp. 501-510. (Studies in environmental science 21).


Amundson, R. G.; Weinstein, L. H. (1981) Joint action of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide on foliar injury
       and stomatal behavior in soybean. J. Environ.  Qual. 10: 204-206.


Amundson, R. G,; Weinstein, L. H.;  van Leuken, P.;  Colavito, L.  J. (1982) Joint action of HF and NO2 on  .
       growth, fluorine accumulation, and leaf resistance in Marcross sweet corn. Environ. Exp. Bot. 22: 49-55.


Anderson, L. S.; Mansfield, T. A.  (1979) The effects  of nitric  oxide pollution on the growth of tomato. Environ.
       Pollut. 20: 113-121.

Arndt, U. (1974) The Kautsky-effect: a method for the investigation of the actions of air pollutants in
       chloroplasts.  Environ. Pollut. 6: 181-194.

Asada, K.; Deura, R.; Kasai,  Z.  (1968) Effect of sulfate ions on photophosphorylation by spinach chloroplasts.
       Plant Cell Physiol. 9: 143-146.

Ashenden, T. W. (1979a) Effects of SO2 and NO2 pollution on  transpiration onPhaseolus vulgaris 1. Environ.
       Pollut.  18: 45-50.

Ashenden, T. W. (1979b) The effects of long-term exposures to SO2 and NO2 pollution on the growth ofDactylis
       glomerata'L. and Pod pratensis L. Environ. Pollut. 18: 249-258.

Ashenden, T. W.; Mansfield, T. A. (1978) Extreme pollution sensitivity of grasses when SO2 and NO2 are
        present in the atmosphere together. Nature (London) 273: 142-143.     .    .

 Ashenden, T. W.; Williams, I. A. D. (1980) Growth  reductions in Lolium multiflorum Lam.  and Phleum
       pmtense L. as a result of SO2 and NO2 pollution. Environ.  Pollut. Ser. A 21: 131-139.


 Ashenden, T. W.; Mansfield, T. A.;  Harrison, R. M. (1977) Generation of air pollutants from kerosene
        combustion in commercial and domestic  glasshouses. Environ. Pollut. 14: 93-100.

 Ashmore, M.  R.; Bell, J. N.  B.; Mimmack,  A.  (1988) Crop growth along a gradient of ambient air pollution.
        Environ. Pollut. 53: 99-121.

 Aslam, M.; Rosichan, J. L.;  Huffaker, R. C. (1987) Comparative induction of nitrate reductase by nitrate and
        nitrite in barley leaves. Plant Physiol. 83: 579-584.
          August 1991
                                                  9-163
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
 Aurela, A.; Punkkinen, R. (1981) Atmospheric nitrogen dioxide and northern plants. Rep. Kevo Subarctic Res.
        Stat. 17: 1-6.


 Ball, J. T. (1987) Calculations related to gas exchange. In: Zeiger, E.; Farquhar, G. D.; Cowan, I. R., eds.
        Stomatal function. Stanford, CA: Stanford Press; pp. 445-476.


 Bassham, J. A. (1971) The control of photosynthetic carbon metabolism. Science (Washington, DC)
        172: 526-534.


 Beattie, J. R. (1967) Nitric oxide. In: Eldridge, A. A.; Dyson, G.  M.; Welch, A. J.; Pantory, D. A.,  eds.
        Supplement to Mellor's comprehensive treatise on inorganic and theoretical chemistry: 8th supplement,
        part 2. London, United Kingdom: Longmans; pp. 216-240.


 Beevers, L.; Hageman, R. H. (1969) Nitrate reduction in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 20: 495-522.


 Benedict, H. M.; Breen, W. H. (1955) The use of weeds as a means of evaluating vegetation damage caused by
        air pollution. In: Proceedings of the third national air pollution symposium;  pp. 177-190.


 Bennett, J. H.; Hill, A. C. (1973) Inhibition of apparent photosynthesis by air pollutants. J. Environ. Qual.
        2: 526-530.


 Bennett, J. H.; Hill, A. C. (1975) Interactions of air pollutants with canopies of vegetation. In: Mudd, J. B.;
        Kozlowski, T. T., eds. Responses of plants to air pollution. New York, NY: Academic Press;
        pp. 273-306.


 Bennett, J. H.; Hill, A. C.; Soleimani, A.; Edwards, W. H. (1975) Acute effects of combination of sulphur
        dioxide and nitrogen dioxide on plants. Environ.  Pollut. 9: 127-132.


 Bennett, J. H.; Lee, E. H.; Heggestad, H. E. (1990) Inhibition of photosynthesis and leaf conductance
        interactions induced by SO2, NO2 and SO2 + NO2. Atmos.  Environ. 24A: 557-562.


 Berge, H. (1963) Phototoxische Immissionen [Phototoxic emissions]. Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany:
        Parey Verlag.


 Besford, R. T.; Hand, D. W.  (1989) The effects of CO2 enrichment and nitrogen oxides on some Calvin cycle
        enzymes and nitrite reductase in glasshouse lettuce. J. Exp. Bot. 40: 329-336.


 Bingham, F. T.; Chapman, H. D.; Pugh, A. L. (1954) Solution-culture studies of nitrite toxicity to plants. Soil
        Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 18: 305-308.


Bloom, A. J.; Caldwell, R. M.; Finazzo, J.; Warner, R.  L.; Weissbart, J. (1989) Oxygen and carbon dioxide
        fluxes from barley shoots  depend on nitrate assimilation. Plant Physiol. 91: 352-356.


Bonner, F. T. (1970) Oxygen exchange between nitric oxide and water. Inorg. Chem. 9: 190-193.


Bonner, F. T.; Jordan, S. (1973)  Simultaneous nitrogen and oxygen exchange (NO-H2O and NO-NO2")  between
       NO and aqueous solutions of nitrite. Inorg.  Chem. 12: 1363-1369.


Bowden, R. D.; Geballe, G. T.; Bowden, W. B. (1989) Foliar uptake of ISN from simulated cloud water by red
       spruce (Picea rubens) seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 382-386.


Briskin, D. P.; Leonard, R. T.; Hodges, T. K. (1987) Isolation  of plasma membranes: membrane markers and
       general properties. Methods Enzymol. 148: 542-558.
         August 1991
                                                9-164
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Brown, K. A.; Roberts, T. M. (1988) Effects of ozone on foliar leaching in Norway spruce (Picea abies L.
       Karst): confounding factors due to NOX production during ozone generation. Environ. Pollut. 55: 55-73.

Bruggink, G. T.; Wolting, H. G.; Dassen, J. H. A.; Bus, V. G. M. (1988) The effect of nitric oxide fumigation
       at two CO2 concentrations on net photosynthesis and stomatal resistance of tomato (Lycopersicon
       lycopersicum'L. cv. Abunda). New Phytol. 110: 185-191.

Brunswick, P.; Cresswell, C. F. (1988a) Nitrite uptake into intact pea chloroplasts;  I. kinetics and relationship
       with nitrite assimilation. Plant Physiol. 86: 378-383.

Brunswick,.?.; Cresswell, C. F. (1988b) Nitrite uptake into intact pea chloroplasts:  II. influence of electron
       transport regulators, uncouplers, ATPase and anion uptake inhibitors and protein binding reagents. Plant
       Physiol. 86; 384-389.

Buchanan, B. B.; Wolosiuk, R. A.; Schuermann, P. (1979) Thioredoxin and enzyme regulation. Trends
       Biochem. Sci. 4: 93-96.                                           .      •

Bull, H.  B. (1964) An introduction to physical biochemistry.  Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Publishing Co.

Bull, J. N.; Mansfield, T. A. (1974) Photosynthesis in leaves exposed to SO2 and NO2. Nature (London)
       250: 443-444.

Caporn,  S. J. M. (1989) The effects of oxides of nitrogen and carbon dioxide enrichment on photosynthesis and
       growth of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). New Phytol. Ill: 473-481.

Capron,  T. M.; Mansfield,  T.  A. (1975) Generation of nitrogen oxide pollutants during CO2 enrichment of
       glasshouse atmospheres. J. Hort. Sci. 50: 233-238.

Capron,  T. M.; Mansfield,  T.  A. (1976) Inhibition of net photosynthesis in tomato  in air polluted with NO and
       N02. J. Exp. Bot. 27:  1181-1186.

Capron,  T. M.; Mansfield,  T.  A. (1977) Inhibition of growth in tomato by air polluted with nitrogen oxides.
       J. Exp. Bot. 28: 112-116.

Carlson,  R. W. (1983) Interaction between SO2 and NO2 and their effects on photosynthetic properties of soybean
       Glydne max. Environ. Pollut.  Ser. A 32:  11-38.

Chapman, D. J.; Leech, R. M. (1979) Changes in pool sizes of free amino acids and amides in leaves and
       plastids of Zea mays during leaf development. Plant Physiol.  63: 567-572.

Chappelka, A. H.; Chevone, B. I. (1989)  Two methods to determine plant responses to pollutant mixtures.
       Environ. Pollut. 61: 31-45.

Cheng, C.-L.; Dewdney, J.; Kleinhofs, A.;  Goodman, H. M. (1986) Cloning and nitrate induction of nitrate
       reductase mRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83:  6825-6828.

Commission of the European Communities.  (1986) Microclimate and plant growth in open-top chambers.
       Commission of the European Communities; pp. 127 and 185;  air pollution research report number 5
       (EUR 11257).

Cowan,  I. R.; Farquhar, G. D. (1977) Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. Symp.
        Soc. Exp.  Biol. 31: 471-505,
         August 1991
                                                 9-165
DRAFT-DO NOT QJUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
50
51
52
53
54
 Crawford, N. M.; Campbell, W. H.; Davis, R. W. (1986) Nitrate reductase from squash: cDNA cloning and
        nitrate regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.  83: 8073-8076.
                                                                               ',                    *
 Crofts, A. R. (1967) Amine uncoupling of energy transfer in chloroplasts: I. relation to ammonium ion uptake.
        J. Biol.  Cfaem. 242: 3352-3359.


 Czech, M.; Nothdurft, W. (1952) Untersuchungen ueber Schaedigungen landwirtschaftlicher und gaertnerischer
        Kulturpflanzen durch Chlor- Nitrbse- und Schwefeldioxydgase [Examinations of damage to agricultural
        and garden cultivated plants by chlorine,  nitrosulphuric acid and sulphur dioxide gases]. Landwirtsch.
        Forsch.  4: 1-36.


 Balling, M. J.;  Tolbert, N. E.; Hageman, R. H. (1972) Latracellular location of nitrate reductase and nitrite
        reductase: I. spinach and tobacco leaves.  Biochim. Biophys.  Acta 283: 505-512.


 Darrall, N. M. (1989) The effect of air pollutants on physiological processes in plants. Plant Cell Environ.
        12:  1-30.


 Dasgupta, P. K. (1982) The reaction of nitrogen oxides with SO2 in aqueous aerosols. Atmos. Environ. 16: 875.


 de Cormis, L.; Luttringer, M. (1976) Effets sur les vegetaux des polluants de Patmosphere lorsqu'ils agissent
        simultanementou succcessivement. Pollut. Atmos. 18: 119-128.


 de Cormis, L.; Luttringer,  M. (1977) Effets sur les vegetaux de la synergie dioxyde de soufre-oxydes d'azote   ,
        [Effects  of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides synergy on vegetation]. In: Kasuga, S.; Suzuki, N.;
        Yamada, T.; Kimura, G.; Inagaki, K.;  Onoe, K., eds.  Proceedings of the fourth international clean air
        congress; May; Tokyo, Japam Tokyo, Japan: The Japanese Union of Air Pollution Prevention Associa-
        tions; pp. 110-111.


 Demerjian, K. L.; Kerr, J. A.; Calvert, J.  G. (1974) The mechanism of photochemical smog formation. In: Pitts,
        J. N., Jr.; Metcalf, R. L.; Lloyd, A. C., eds. Advances in environmental science and technology,  v. 4.
        New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; pp. 1-262.


 Deng, M.-D.; Moureaux, T.; Leydecker, M.-T.; Caboche,  M. (1990) Nitrate-reductase expression is under the
        control of a circadian rhythm and is light indicible in Nicotiana tabacum leaves. Planta 180: 257-261.


 Dolzmann, P.; Ullrich, H.  (1966) Einige Beobachtungen ueber Beziehungen zwischen Chloroplasten und
        Mitchondrien in Palisadenparenchym von Phaseolus vulgaris [Some observations on relationships between
        chloroplasts and mitochondria in palisade tissue of Phaseolus vulgaris leaves]. Z. Pflanzenphysiol.
        55: 165-180.


 Donagi, A. E.; Goren, A. I. (1979) Use of indicator plants  to evaluate atmospheric levels of nitrogen dioxide in
        the vicinity of a chemical plant.  Environ.  Sci. Technol. 13: 986-989.


 Dueck, Th. A.; Ernst, W. H. O.; Mooi, J.; Pasman, F. J. M.  (1986) Effects of SO2, NOX and O3 in combination
        on the yield and reproduction of Silene  cucubalus populations. J. Plant Physiol.  122: 97-106.


 Durmishidze, S.  V.; Nutsubidze, N. N.  (1976)  Absorption and conversion of nitrogen dioxide by higher plants.
        Dokl. Biochem. 227: 104-107.


Durzan, D.J.; Steward, F. C.  (1983) Nitrogen metabolism. In: Steward, F. C., ed. Plant physiology: a treatise;
        v. 8. New York, NY: Academic Press;  pp. 55-265.


Eastham, A. M.; Ormrod, D.  P. (1986) Visible injury and growth responses of young cuttings of Populus
        canadensis and P. nigra to nitrogen dioxide and sulphur dioxide. Can. J.  For. Res. 16:  1289-1292.
         August 1991
                                                 9-166
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9 •:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
 51
 52
 53
Edelbauer, J.; Maier, R. (1988) Singulaer- und Kombinationswirkung niedriger Dosen von SO2 und NO2 auf das
       Wachstum von Pimm saiivum [Single and combined effects of low doses of SO2 and NO2 on growth of
       Pisum sativum]. Flora 181: 61-69.

Elkiey, T.; Ormrod, D. P. (1980) Response of turfgrass cultivars to ozone, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, or
       their mixture. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 105: 664-668.

EMey, T,; Ormrod, D. P. (1981a) Sulphur and nitrogen nutrition and misting effects on the response of
       bluegrass to ozone, sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide or their mixture. Water Air Soil Pollut.
       16: 177-186.

Elkiey, T.; Ormrod, D. P. (1981b) Sorption of O3, SO2, NO2 or their mixture by nine Poapratensis cultivars of
       differing pollutant sensitivity. Atmos.  Environ. 15: 1739-1743.


Elkiey,; T.; Ormrod, D. P. (1981c) Absorption of ozone, sulphur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide by petunia plants.
       Environ. Exp. Bot. 21: 63-70.

Elkiey, T.; Ormrod, D. P. (1981d) Sulphate,  total sulphur and total nitrogen accumulation by petunia leaves
       exposed to ozone, sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. Environ. Pollut. Ser. A 24: 233-241.


Elkiey, T.; Ormrod, D. P. (1987) Casuarina and Eucalyptus response to single and multiple gaseous air
       pollutants. Water Air Soil Pollut. 36:  365-370.

EMey, T.; Ormrod, D. P.;  Marie, B. (1982) Foliar sorption of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone by
       ornamental woody plants. Hortscience 17: 358-360.            ,

Elkiey, T.; Ormrod, D. P.;  Marie, B. A. (1988) Growth responses of crop plants  in the vegetative stage to sulfur
        dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. Gartenbauwissenschaft 53: 61-64.


Ernes, M. J.; Fowler, M. W.  (1979) The intracellular location of the enzymes of nitrate assimilation in the apices
        of seedling pea roots. Planta 144: 249-253.

 Estefan, R. M.; Gause, E. M.; Rowlands, J.  R. (1970) Electron spin resonance and optical studies of the
'   ,     interaction between  NO2 and unsaturated lipid components. Environ. Res.  3: 62-78.


 Evans, L. S.; Canada, D. C.;  Santucci, K.  A. (1986) Foliar uptake of 15N from rain. Environ. Exp. Bot.
        26: 143-146.

 Faller, N. (1972) Schwefeldioxid, Schwefelwasserstoff, nitrose Gase und Ammoniak als ausscbliessliche S- bzw.
        N-Quellen der hoheren Pflanze. Z.  Pfianzenernaehr. Bodenkd. 131: 120-130.


 Farquhar, G. D.; Sharkey, T. D. (1982) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.
        33: 317-345.

 Farquhar, G. D.; Wetselaar, R.; Firth, P. M. (1979) Ammonia volatilization from senescing leaves of maize.
        Science (Washington,  DC) 203: 1257-1258.

 Feder, W. A.; Fox, F. L.;  Heck, W. W.; Campbell, F. J. (1969) Varietal responses of petunia to several  air
        pollutants. Plant Dis.  Rep. 53: 506-510.

 Felmeister, A.; Amanat, M.;  Weiner, N. D.  (1970) Interactions of gaseous air pollutants with egg lecithin and
        phosphatidyl ethanolamine monomolecular films.  Atmos. Environ. 4: 311-319.
          August 1991
                                                   9-167
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
51
52
53
54
 Fink, S. (1988) Hisfological and cytological changes caused by air pollutants and other abiotic factors. In:
        Schulte-Hostede, S.; Darrall, N. M.; Blank, L. W.; Wellburn, A. R., eds. Air pollution and plant
        metabolism: [proceedings of the 2nd international symposium; April 1987; Munich, Federal Republic of
        Germany]. London, United Kingdom: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Ltd.; pp. 36-54.


 Ford, H. W.; Endow, N. (1957) Rate constants at low concentrations.  HI. Atomic oxygen reactions in the
        photolysis of nitrogen dioxide at 3660 A. J. Chem. Phys. 27: 1156-1160.                  '


 Fowler, D.; Cape, J. N. (1982) Air pollutants in agriculture and horticulture. In: Unsworth, M. H.; Ormrod,
        D. P., eds.  Effects of gaseous air pollution in agriculture and horticulture. London, United Kingdom:
        Butterworth Scientific; pp. 3-26.


 Fowler, D.; Cape, J. N.; Nicholson,1!. A.; Kinnaird, J. W.; Paterson, I. S. (1980) The influence of a polluted
        atmosphere  on cuticle degradation in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). In: Drablos, D.; Tollan, A., eds.
        Ecological impact of acid precipitation: proceedings of an international conference; March; Sandefjord,
        Norway. Oslo-Aas, Norway; Norwegian Interdisciplinary Research Programme; SNSF project, p. 146.


 Fravel, D.  R.; Benson, D. M.; Reinert, R. A. (1984) Response of shore juniper to ozone1 alone and in mixture
        with sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. Hortscience  19: 694-695.


 Freer-Smith, P.  H.  (1984) The responses of six broadleaved trees during Iong4erm exposure to SO2 and NO,.
        New Phytol. 97: 49-61.


 Freer-Smith, P.  H.  (1985) The influence of SO2 and NO2 on the growth, development'and gas exchange of Betula
        pendula Roth. New Phytol. 99: 417-430.


 Freer-Smith, P.  H.; Mansfield, T. A. (1987) The combined effects of low temperature and SO2 + NO2 pollution
        on  the new season's growth and water relations of Picea sitchensis. New Phytol. 106: 237-250.


 Fried, M.;  Middleboe, V. (1977) Measurement of amount of nitrogen fixed by a legume crop. Plant Soil
        47: 713-715.


 Fuhrer, J.;  Erismann, K. H. (1980) Uptake of NO2 by plants grown at different  salinity levels. Experientia
        36: 409-410.


 Fujiwara, T. (1973) [Effects of nitrogen oxides in the atmosphere on vegetation]. Kogai to Taisaku 9: 253-257.


 Furukawa,  A.; Totsuka,  T.  (1979) Effects'of NO2, SO2 and O3 alone and in combinations on net photosynthesis
        in sunflower. Environ. Control Biol. 17: 161-166.


 Giamalva, D. H.; Kenion, G.  *>.; Church, D. F.; Pryor, W. A. (1987) Rates and mechanisms of reaction of
        nitrogen dioxide with alkenes in solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109: 7059-7063.


 Glass, A. D. M.; Siddiqi, M.  Y.; Ruth, T. J.; Rufty, T. W.,  Jr, (1990) Studies of the uptake of nitrate in barley
        H. Energetics. Plant Physiol. 93: 1585-1589.


 Godzik, S.; Ashmore, M. R.;  Bell, J. N. B. (1985) Responses of radish cultivars to long-term and short-term
        exposures to sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and their mixture. New Phytol. 100: 191-197.


 Goh, K. M.; Hayes, R. J. (1986) Nitrogen and agronomic practices. In: Hayes, R. J., ed.  Mineral nitogen—the
       plant soil system. New York, NY: Academic Press; pp. 379-468.


Goodyear, S. N.; Ormrod, D.  P.  (1988) Tomato response to'concurrent and sequential NO2 and O3 exposures. '
       Environ. Pollut.  51: 315-326.                         '     	
         August 1991
                                                 9-168
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2,
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23,
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Gould, R. P.; Mansfield, T. A. (1988) Effects of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide on growth and transloca-
       tion in winter wheat. J. Bxp. Bot. 39: 389-399.


Goyal, S. S.; Huffaker, R. C.; Lorenz, O. A. (1982) Inhibitory effects of ammoniacal nitrogen on growth of
       radish plants: II. investigations on the possible causes'of. ammonium toxicity.to radish plants and its
       reversal by nitrate. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 107: 130-135. '                  '

Granat, L.; Johansson, C. (1983) Dry depo'sition of SO2 and NOX in winter. Atmos. Environ. 17: 191-192.


Guderian, R. (1977) Air pollution:' phytotoxicity of acidic gases and its significance in air pollution control.  New
       York, NY: Springer Verlag.                       "--,_•

Guderian, R.; van Haut, H.; Stratmann, H. (1960) Probleme der Erfassung und Beurteilung von Wirkungen
       gasfoermiger Luftverunreinigungen auf die Vegetation [Problems of measurement and evaluation of the
       effect of gaseous air impurities on vegetation]. Z. Pflanzenkrankh. Pflanzenpathol. Pflanzenschutz 67:
       257-264.                                .                        ,

Gupta, S. C.; Beevers, L. (1983) Environmental influences  on nitrite reductase activity in Pisum sativum L.
       seedlings. J. Exp. Bot. 34: 1455-1462.

Gupta, G.; Sabaratnam, S. (1988) Reduction in soya-bean yield after a brief exposure to nitrogen dioxide.
       J. Agric. Sci. 110: 399-400.

Gutknecht, J.; Walter, A. (1981) Hydrofluoric and nitric acid transport through lipid bilayer membranes.
       Biochim. Biophys. Acta 644:  153-156.                               .

Hageman, R. H.; Hucklesby,  D.  P. (1971) Nitrate reductase from higher plants. Methods Enzymol. 23: 491-503.


Hager, A.; Biber, W. (1984) Functional and regulatory properties of H+ pumps at the tonoplast and plasma
       membranes of Z£a mays coleoptiles. Z.  Naturforsch. C: Biosci. 39c: 927-937.

Hand, D. W. (1982) CO2 enrichment, the benefits and problems. Sci. Hortic. (Canterbury, Engl.) 33: 14-43.


Hanson, P. J.; Rott, K.; Taylor,  G. E., Jr.; Gunderson, C. A.; Lindberg,  S. E.;  Ross-Todd, B. M. (1989) NO2
       deposition to elements representative of a forest landscape. Atmos.  Environ. 23: 1783-1794.


Harper, J. E. (1981) Evolution of nitrogen oxide(s) during  in vivo nitrate reductase assay of soybean  leaves.
       Plant Physiol. 68: 1488-1493.

Harris, P.; Whittington, W. J. (1983) Effects of temperature, levels of nitrate supply and duration of light and
       growth on nitrate reductase activity mAgrostis tentiis and Agrostis  stolonifera.  New Phytol. 93: 193-201.

Harris, G. W.; Carter, W. P. L.; Winer,  A.' M.; Graham, R. A.; Pitts, J,  N., Jr. (1982) Studies of trace
       non-ozone species produced in a corona discharge ozonizer. J.,Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 32: 274-276.

Hartung, W.; Radin, J. W.; Hendrix, D.  L. (1988) Abscisic acid movement into  the apoplastic solution of
       water-stressed cotton leaves: role of apoplastic pH.  Plant Physiol. 86:  908-913.

Hayes, R. J. (1986) Uptake and the uses of nitrogen by plants. In: Hayes;  R. J.,  ed. Mineral nitrogen—the plant
       soil system. New York, NY:  Academic Press; pp. 303-378.

Heath, R. L. (1980) Initial'events in injury to plants by  air pollutants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31: 395-431.
         August11991
                                                  9-169       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Heath, R. L. (1988) Biochemical mechanisms of pollutant stress. In: Heck, W. W.; Taylor, O. C.; Tingey,
       D. T., eds. Assessment of crop loss from air pollutants: proceedings of an international conference;
       October, 1987; Raleigh, NC. London, United Kingdom: Elsevier Applied Science; pp. 259-286.


Heath, R. L.; Leech, R. M. (1978) The stimulation of CO2-supported O2 evolution in intact spinach chloroplasts
       by ammonium ion. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 190: 221-226.


Heber, U.; Purczeld, P. (1978) Substrate and product fluxes across the chloroplast envelope during bicarbonate
       and nitrite reduction. In: Hall,  D. O.; Coombs, J.; Goodwin, T. W., eds. Proceedings of the fourth
       international congress on photosynthesis; September 1977; Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom.
       London, United Kingdom: The Biochemical Society; pp. 107-118.


Heck, W. W. (1964) Plant injury induced by photochemical reaction products of propylene-nitrogen dioxide
       mixtures. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc.  14: 255-261.


Heck, W. W.; Tingey, D. T. (1979) Nitrogen dioxide: time-concentration model to predict acute foliar injury.
       Corvallis, OR: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory;
       EPA report no. EPA-600/3-79-057. Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB-299218.


Heck, W. W.; Dunning, J. A.; Johnson, H. (1968) Design of a simple plant exposure chamber. Cincinnati, OH:
       U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Center for Air Pollution Control;
       publication no. APTD-68-6. Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB-195151. .


Heck, W. W.; Philbeck, R. B.; Dunning, J. A. (1978) A continuous stirred  tank reactor (CSTR) system for
       exposing plants to gaseous air contaminants: principles, specifications, construction and operation. U. S.
       Agric. Res. Ser. S-181.


Heldt, H. W.; Fluegge, U. I.; Stitt, M. (1986) Kohlenhydratstoffwechsel der pflanzlichen Photosynthese. Biol.
       Unserer Zeit 16: 97-105.


Hewitt, E. J. (1975) Assimilatory nitrate-nitrite reduction. Annu. Rev.  Plant Physiol. 26: 73-100.


Hill, A. C. (1971) Vegetation: a sink for atmospheric pollutants. J.  Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 21: 341-346.


Hill, A. C.; Bennett, J. H. (1970) Inhibition of apparent photosynthesis by nitrogen oxides. Atmos.  Environ.
       4: 341-348.


Hill, A. C.; Hill, S.; Lamb, C.; Barrett,  T. W. (1974) Sensitivity of native desert vegetation totSO2 and to SO2
       and NO2 combined. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 24: 153-157.


Hisamatsu, S.; Nihira, J.; Takeuchi, Y.; Satoh, S.; Kondo, N. (1988) NO2 suppression of light-induced nitrate  .
       reductase in squash cotyledons. Plant Cell  Physiol. 29: 395-401.
                                                               i. -             .

Hogsett, W. E.;  Gumpertz, M. L.; Holman, S. R.; Tingey, D. T. (1984) Growth response in spinach to
       sequential and simultaneous exposure to NO2 and SO2. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.  109: 252-256.


Holmes, H. H.; Daniels,  F. (1934) The photolysis of nitrogen oxides: N2OS, N2O4 and NO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
       56: 630-637.


Homer, J. R.; Cotton, R.; Evans,  E. H. (1980) Whole leaf fluorescence as a technique for measurement of     ':
       tolerance of plants to heavy metals.  Oecologia 45: 88-89.


Horsman, D. C.; Wellburn, A. R. (1975) Synergistic effect of SO2 and NO2 polluted air upon enzyme activity in'.
       pea seedlings. Environ. Pollut.  8: 123-133.
         August 1991
                                                 9-170
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38-
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47,
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Hou, L.-Y.; Hill, A. C.; Soleimani, A. (1977) Influence of CO2 on the effects of SO2 and NO2 on alfalfa.
       Environ. Pollut. 12: 7-16.


Kurd, R. G.; Sheard, G. F. (1981) Fuel savings in greenhouses: the biological aspects. London, United
       Kingdom: Grower Books.


Huttunen, S.; Soikkeli, S. (1984) Effects of various gaseous pollutants on plant cell ultrastructure. In: Koziol,
       M. J.; Whatley, F. R., eds. Gaseous air pollutants and plant metabolism: [proceedings of the 1st
       international symposium on air pollution and plant metabolism; August 1982; Oxford, United Kingdom].
       London, United Kingdom: Butterworths; pp. 117-127.


Ingle, J.; Joy, K. W.; Hageman, R. H. (1966) The regulation of activity of the enzymes involved in the
       assimilation of nitrate by higher plants. Biochem.  J. 100: 577-588.


Irving, P. M.; Miller, J. E. (1984) Synergistic effect on field-grown soybeans from combinations of sulfur
       dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. Can. J.  Bot. 62: 840-846.


Irving, P. M.; Miller, J. E.; Xerikos, P. B. (1982) The effect of NO2 and,SO2 alone and in combination on the
       productivity of field-grown soybeans.  In: Schneider, T.;  Grant, L., eds. Air pollution by nitrogen oxides.
       Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company; pp. 521-531.


Ishikawa, H. (1976) Sensitivity of cultivated plants to air  pollutants. Central Research Institute of Electric Power
       Industry, Bio-Environment Laboratory; October.


Ito, O.; Okano, K.; Kuroiwa, M.; Totsuka,,T. (1984a) Effects of NO2 and O3 alone or in combination on kidney
       bean plant: I. growth, partitioning of assimilates and root activities. Res. Rep. Natl1. Inst. Environ. Stud.
       Jpn. 66: 1-13.


Ito, O.; Okano, K.; Totsuka, T. (1984b) Effects of NO2 and O3 alone or in combination on kidney bean plants.
       II. Amino acid pool size and composition. Res. Rep. Natl. Inst.  Environ. Stud.  Jpn. 66: 15-24.

Ito, O.; Mitsumori, F.; Totsuka, T. (1985a) Effects of NO2 and O3 alone and in combination on kidney bean
       plants (Phaseolus vulgaris'L.):  products of 13CO2 assimilation detected by 13C nuclear magnetic resonance.
       J. Exp. Bot. 36: 281-289.

Ito, O.; Okano, K.; Kuroiwa, M.; Totsuka, T. (1985b) Effects of NO2 and O3 alone or  in combination  on kidney
       bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): growth, partitioning of assimilates and root activities. J. Exp. Bot.
       36: 652-662.


Ito, O.; Okano, K.; Totsuka, T. (1986) Effects of NO2 and O3 exposure alone or in combination on kidney bean
       plants: II. amino acid content and composition. Soil StiL Plant Nutr. 32: 351-363.


Jacobson, J. S.; McManus, J. M.  (1985) Pattern of atmospheric sulphur dioxide occurrence: an important
       criterion in vegetation effects assessment. Atmos.  Environ., 19: 501-506.           ,


Johansson, C. (1987) Pine forest: a negligible sink for atmospheric NOX in rural Sweden. Tellus Ser. B
       39: 426-438.                        >


Jordan, S.; Bonner, F. T. (1973) Nitrogen and oxygen exchange between nitric oxide and aqueous solutions of
       nitric acid. Inorg. Chem. 12: 1369-1373.


Joy, K. W.  (1969) Nitrogen metabolism of Lemna minor. II. Enzymes of nitrate assimilation and some aspects of
     .  their regulation. Plant Physiol. 44: 849-853.
         August 1991
                                                 9-171
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
 Kaiser, W. M.; Foerster, J. (1989) Low CO2 prevents nitrate reduction in leaves. Plant Physiol. 91: 970-974.


 Kaji, M.; Yoneyama, T.; Totsuka, T.; Iwaki, H. (1980) Absorption of atmospheric NO2 by plants and soils.
        VI. Transformation of NO2 absorbed in the leaves and transfer of the nitrogen through the plants.
        Kokuritsu Kogai Kenkyusho Kenkyu Hokoku 11: 51-58.


 Kato, T.; Tachibana, S.; Ihden, T. (1974) [Studies on the injury of crops by toxic gases in covering structure:
        (II) mechanisms involved in the sensitivity of plants to NOJ. Seibutsu Kankyo Chosetsu 12: 103-107.


 Kessler, E.; Zumft, W. G. (1973) Effect of nitrite and nitrate on chlorophyll fluorescence in green algae. Planta
        111: 41-46.


 Kisser-Priesack, G. M.; Scheunert, I.; Gnatz, G.; Ziegler, H. (1987) Uptake of 15NO2 and 15NO by plant
        cuticles. Naturwissenschaften 74: 550-551.


 Klarer, C. I.; Reinert, R. A.; Huang, J. S. (1984) Effects of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide on vegetative
        growth of soybeans. Phytopathology 74: 1104-1106.


 Klepper, L. (1979) Nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NOj) emissions from herbicide-treated soybean
        plants. Atmos. Environ. 13: 537-542.


 Klumpp, G.; Guderian, R. (1989) Wirkung verschiedener Kombinationen von O3, SO2 und NO2 auf
        Photosynthese und Atmung:  Wirkungen bei Fichten mit unterschiedlicher Mg-Ca-Versorgung [Effects of
        various combinations of O3,  SO2, and NO2 on photosynthesis and dark respiration of spruce trees with
        different Mg and Ca supply]. Staub Reinhalt. Luft 49: 255-260.


 Klumpp, G.; Guderian, R.; Kueppers, K. (1989a) Peroxidase- und Superoxiddismutase-Aktivitaet sowie
        Prolingehalte von Fichtennadehi nach Belastung mit O3, SO2 und NO2 [Peroxidase activity, superoxide
        dismutase activity and proline contents of spruce needles fumigated with O3, SO2 and NOJ. Eur. J. For.'
        Pathol. 19: 84-97.


 Klumpp, A.; Kueppers, K.; Guderian, R. (1989b) Nitrate reductase activity of needles of Norway spruce
        fumigated with different mixtures of ozone, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. Environ. Pollut.
        58: 261-271.


 Koch, G.  W.;  Schulze, E.-D.; Percival, F.;  Mooney, H. A.; Chu, C. (1988) The nitrogen balance of Raphanus
        sativus x raphanistrum plants II: growth, nitrogen redistribution and photosynthesis under NO3"
        deprivation. Plant Cell Environ. 11:  755-767.


 Krause, G. H. M. (1988) Ozone-induced nitrate formation in needles and leaves of Picea abies, Fagus sylvatica
        and Quercus robur. Environ. Pollut. 52: 117-130.


 Krause, G.; Jung, K. D.;  Prinz, B. (1985) Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Aufkjarung der neuartigen
        Waldschaden in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Experimental investigations  to explain the new types of
        forest damage in the Federal Republic of Germany]. VDI Ber. 560: 627-656.                       •
                                                             •  .                                    ;
 Kress, L.  W.;  Skelly, J. M. (1982) Response of several eastern forest tree species to chronic doses of ozone and
        nitrogen dioxide. Plant Dis.  66: 1149-1152.


Kress, L.  W.;  Skelly, J. M.; Hinkelmann, K. H. (1982a) Growth impact of O3,  NO2 and/or SO2 onPlatanus
        occidentalis. Agric. Environ. 7: 265-274.                                '.-.'.


Kress, L.  W.;  Skelly, J. M.; Hinkelmann, K. H. (1982b) Growth impact of O3, NO2 and/or SO2 on Pinus taeda.
        Environ. Monit. Assess. 1: 229-239.
         August 1991
                                                 9-172
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Lacasse, N. L.; Treshow, M., eds. (1976) Diagnosing vegetation injury caused by air pollution. Research
       Triangle Park, NC: U.  S. Environmental Protection Agency, Air Pollution Training Institute; EPA report
       no. EPA-405/3-78-005.


Laisk, A.; Kull, O.; Moldau, H. (1989) Ozone concentration in leaf intercellular air spaces is close to zero. Plant
       Physiol. 90: 1163-1167.


Lane, P. I.; Bell,  J. N. B. (1984a) The effects of simulated urban air pollution on grass yield: part I - description
       and simulation of ambient pollution. Environ. Pollut. Ser. B 8: 245-263.


Lane, P. I.; Bell,  J. N. B. (1984b) The effects of simulated urban air pollution on grass yield: part 2—
       performance of Lolium perenne, Phleum pratense and Dactylis  glomerata fumigated with SO2, NO2
       and/or NO. Environ. Pollut. Ser. A 35: 97-124.


Larsen, R. I.; Heck, W. W. (1976) An air quality data analysis system for interrelating effects,  standards, and
       needed source reductions: part 3. vegetation injury. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc.  26: 325-333.


Larsson, M.; Olsson, T.; Larsson, C.-M. (1985) Distribution of reducing power between photosynthetic carbon
       and nitrogen assimilation in Scenedesmus. Planta 164: 246-253.


Law, R. M.; Mansfield, T. A. (1982) Oxides of nitrogen and the greenhouse atmosphere. In: Unsworth, M. H.;
       Ormrod, D. P., eds. Effects of gaseous air pollution in agriculture and horticulture. London, United
       Kingdom: Butterworth Scientific; pp. 93-112.


Lea, P. J.; Miflin, B. J. (1974) Alternative route for nitrogen assimilation in higher plants. Nature (London)
       251: 614-616.


Lee, R. B. (1978) Inorganic nitrogen metabolism in barley roots under poorly aerated conditions. J.  Exp. Bot.
       29: 693-708.


Lee, J. J.; Lewis, R. A. (1977) Zonal air pollution sustems. Design and performance. In:  Preston, M.;  Lewis,
       R. A., eds. The bioenvironmental impact of a coal fired power plant; pp. 322-344; EPA interim report
       no. EPA-600/3-78-021.


Lee, Y.-N.; Schwartz, S. E. (1981) Reaction kinetics of nitrogen dioxide with liquid water at low partial
       pressures. J. Phys. Chem. 85: 840-848.

Lee, J. A.; Stewart, G. R. (1978) Ecological aspects of nitrogen assimilation.  Adv. Bot. Res. 6: 1-43.


Lee, J. H.; Tang, I. N. (1988) Accommodation coefficient of gaseous  NO2 on water surfaces. Atmos. Environ.
       22: 1147-1151.


Lee, J. A.; Woodin, S. J. (1988) Vegetative structure and the interception of acidic deposition by ombrotrophic
       mires. In: Verhoeven, J. T. A.; Heil, G.  H.; Weiger, M. J. A., eds. Vegetation structure in relation to
       carbon and nutrient economy. The Hague, The Netherlands: SPB Academy  Publishing; pp. 137-147.


Lefohn, A. S.;  Tingey, D. T. (1984) The co-occurrence of potentially phytotoxic concentrations of various
       gaseous air pollutants. Atmos. Environ. 18: 2521-2526.


Lefohn, A. S.;  Davis, C. E.; Jones, C. K.; Tingey, D.  T.; Hogsett, W. E. (1987a) Co-occurrence patterns of
       gaseous air pollutant pairs at different minimum concentrations in the United States. Atmos.  Environ.
       21: 2435-2444.
         August 1991
                                                  9-173
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Lefohn, A. S.; Hogsett, W. E.; Tingey, D. T. (1987b) The development of sulfur dioxide and ozone"exposure
       profiles that mimic ambient conditions in the rural southeastern United States. Atmos. Environ.
       21: 659-669.


Lefohn, A. S.; Benkeovitz,  C. M.; Tanner, R. L.; Shadwick, D. S.; Smith, L. A. (1990) Air quality
       measurements and characterizations for terrestrial effects research. Washington, DC: National Acid
       Precipitation Assessment Program; state of science and technology report no. 7.


Lendzian, K. J.; Kerstiens, G. (1988) Interactions between plant cuticles and gaseous air pollutants. Aspects
       Appl. Biol.  17: 97-104.


Levitt, J. (1980) Response of plants to environmental stress. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Academic Press.


Lew, R. R.; Spanswick, R.  M. (1985) Characterization of anion effects on the nitrate-sensitive ATP-dependent
       proton pumping activity of soybean (Glycine max L.) seedling root microsomes. Plant Physiol.
       77: 352-357.


Lopata, W.-D.; Ullrich, H.  (1975) Untersuchungen zu stofflichen und strukturellen Veranderungen an Pflanzen
       unter NO2-Einfluss [Investigations of material and structural changes in plants under the influence of
       NOJ. Staub. Reinhalt Luft. 35:  196-200.


Losada, M.; Arnon, D. J. (1963) Selective inhibitors of photosynthesis. In: Hochster, R. M.; Quastel, J. H.,
       eds. Metabolic inhibitors: a comprehensive treatise, v. II.  New York,  NY: Academic Press; pp. 559-593.


Losada, M.; Paneque, A.  (1971) Nitrate reductase. Methods Enzymol. 23: 487-491.


Losada, M.; Ramirez, J. M.; Paneque, A.; Del Campo, F. F. (1965) Light and dark reduction of nitrate in a
       reconstituted chloroplast system. Biochim. Biophys.  Acta 109: 86-96.


Lutten, H.; Bigdon, M.; Bottger, M.  (1990) Reexamination of the acid growth theory of auxin action. Plant
       Physiol.  93: 931-939


MacLean, D. C.; McCune, D.  C.; Weinstein, L. H.; Mandl, R. H.; Woodruff, G. N. (1968) Effects of acute
       hydrogen fluoride and nitrogen dioxide exposures on citrus and ornamental plants of central Florida.
       Environ. Sci. Technol.  2: 444-449.


Magalhaes, A. C.; Neyra, C. A.; Hageman, R. H. (1974) Nitrite assimilation and amino nitrogen synthesis in
       isolated spinach chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 53: 411-415.


Magalhaes, J. R.; Ju, G. C.; Rich, P. J.; Rhodes, D. (1990) Kinetics of I5NH4+ assimilation in Zea mays.  Plant
       Physiol.  94: 647-656.


Mahoney, M. J.; Skelly, J.  M.; Chevone, B. I.; Moore, L.  D. (1984) Response of yellow poplar (Liriodendron
       tttlipifera L.) seedling shoot growth to low concentrations of O3, SO2, and NO2. Can.  J. For. Res.
       14: 150-153.


Malhotra, S. S.; Khan,  A. A. (1984) Biochemical and physiological impact of major pollutants. In:
       Treshow, M., ed. Air pollution and plant life. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley and Sons;
       pp. 113-157.


Mansfield, T. A.; Freer-Smith, P. H. (1981) Effects of urban air pollution on plant growth. Biol. Rev.
       56: 343-368.
         August 1991
                                                 9-174
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
Mansfield, T. A.; McCune, D. C. (1988) Problems of crop loss assessment when there is exposure to two or
       more gaseous pollutants. In: Heck, W. W.; Taylor, O.  C.; Tingey, D. T., eds. Assessment of crop loss
       from air pollutants. London, United Kingdom: Elsevier Applied Science; pp. 317-344.


Mansfield, T. A.; Murray, A. J.,S. (1984) Pollutants generated in greenhouses during  CO2 enrichment. In:
       Symposium on CO2 enrichment; June; Aas, Norway. Acta Hortic.  162: 171-178.


Marie, B. A.; Ormrod,  D. P.  (1984) Tomato plant growth with continuous exposure to sulphur dioxide and
       nitrogen dioxide. Environ. Pollut. Ser. A 33: 257-265.


Matsumaru,  T.; Yoneyama, T.; Totsuka, T.; Shiratori, K.  (1979) Absorption of atmospheric NO2by plants and
       soils: (I) quantitative estimation of absorbed NO2 in plants by I5N method. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.
       25: 255-265.


Matsumoto,  H.; Wakiuchi, N. (1974) Changes in ATP in cucumber leaves during ammonium toxicity.
       Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 73: 82-85.


Matsumoto,  H.; Wakiuchi, N.; Takahashi, E. (1971) Changes of some mitochondrial enzyme activities of
       cucumber leaves during ammonium toxicity. Physiol. Plant. 25: 353-357.


Matsushima, J.  (1971) Shokubutsu ni taisuru aryusan gasu  to okishidanto no fukugogai ni tsuite [On composite
       harm to plants by sulfurous acid gas and oxidant]. Sangyo Kogai 7: 218-224.


Matsushima, J.  (1977) Sensitivities of plants to ethylene and nitrogen dioxide, and the characteristic changes in
       fine  structure of the cell. In: Kasuga, S.; Suzuki, N.; Yamada,  T.; Kimura, G.; Inagaki, K.;  Onoe, K.,
       eds.  Proceedings of the fourth international clean air congress; May; Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan: The
       Japanese Union of Air Pollution Prevention Associations; pp. 112-115.


Mayer, R. R.; Cherry, J.  H.; Rhodes,  D. (1990) Effects of heat shock on amino acid metabolism of cowpea
   j ,   cells. Plant Physiol. 94: 796-810.


Mehlhorn, H.; Wellburn,  A. R. (1987) Stress ethylene formation determines plant sensitivity to ozone. Nature
       .(London) 327: 417-418.


Mehlhorn, H.; Cottam, D. A.; Lucas,  P. W.; Wellburn, A. R.  (1987)  Induction of ascorbate peroxidase and
       glutathione reductase activities  by interactions of mixtures of air pollutants. Free Radic. Res.  Commun.
       3: 193-197.


Melcarek, P. K.; Brown, G. N. (1977) Effects of chill stress on prompt and delayed chlorophyll fluorescence
       from leaves. Plant Physiol. 60: 822-825.


Menser, H. A.; Heggestad, H. E. (1966) Ozone and sulfur dioxide synergism: injury to tobacco plants. Science
       (Washington, DC)  153: 424-425.


Miflin, B. J. (1970) Studies on the sub-cellular location of particulate nitrate and nitrite reductase, glutamate
       dehydrogenase and other enzymes of barley roots. Planta 93: 160-170.


Miflin, B. J. (1980) Amino acid and derivatives. In: The biochemistry of plants: a comprehensive treatise. New
       York, NY: Academic Press; pp. 670. 5v.


Miflin, B. J-; Lea, P. J. (1976) The pathway of nitrogen assimilation in plants. Phytochemistry 15: 873-885.
         August 1991
                                                 9-175
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Mooi, J. (1984) Wirkungen von SO2, NO2, O3 and ihrer Mischungen auf Pappeln and einig andere Pflanzenarten
       [Effects of SO2, NO2, O3 and combinations of them on poplars and some other kinds of plants]. Forst.
       Holzwirt. 39: 438-444.


Mortenscn, L. M. (1985a) Nitrogen oxides produced during CO2 enrichment: I. effects on different greenhouse
       plants. New Phytol. 101: 103-108.


Mortensen, L. M. (1985b) Nitrogen oxides produced during CO2 enrichment: II. effects on different tomato and
       lettuce cultivars. New Phytol. 101: 411-415.


Mortensen, L. M. (1986) Nitrogen oxides produced during CO2 enrichment: III. effects on tomato at different
       photon flux densities. New Phytol. 104: 653-660.


Morvan,  C.; Demarty, M.; Thellier, M. (1979) Titration of isolated cell wall of Lemma minor L. Plant Physiol.
       63: 1117-1122.


Mudd, J. B. (1982) Effects of oxidants on metabolic function. In: Proceedings of the Easter School in
       Agricultural Science, University of Nottingham: v. 32, gaseous air pollution and agricultural horticulture.
       London,  United Kingdom: Butterworths; pp. 189-203.


Mudd, J. B.; Banerjee, S. K.; Dooley, M.  M.; Knight, K. L. (1984) Pollutants and plant cells: effects on
       membranes.  In: Koziol, M. J.; Whatley, F. R., eds. Gaseous air pollutants and plant metabolism:
       [proceedings of the 1st international symposium on air pollution and plant metabolism; August 1982;
       Oxford, United Kingdom]. London, United Kingdom: Butterworths; pp. 105-116.


Muller, R. N.; Miller, J. E.; Sprugel, D.  C. (1979) Photosynthetic response of field grown soybeans to
       fumigation with sulphur dioxide. J. Appl.  Ecol. 16: 567-576.


Murray, A. J. S. (1984a) Light affects the deposition of NO2 to theflacca mutant of tomato without affecting the
       rate of transpiration.  New Phytol.  98: 447-450.


Murray, A. J. S. (1984b) Pollution damage in greenhouses:  a biochemical and physiological investigation of
       plant injury by NOX [Ph.D. thesis]. Lancaster,  United Kingdom: University of Lancaster.


Murray, A. J. S.; Wellburn, A.  R. (1985) Differences in nitrogen metabolism between cultivars of tomato and
       pepper during exposure to  glasshouse atmospheres containing oxides of nitrogen. Environ. Pollut. Ser. A
       39: 303-316.


Nash, T. (1970)  Absorption of nitrogen dioxide by aqueous solutions. J. Chem.  Soc. A (18):  3023-3024.


Nash, T. (1979)  The effect of nitrogen dioxide and of some transition metals on the oxidation of dilute bisulphite
       solutions. Atmos. Environ. 13: 1149-1154.


National Research Council. (1977) Nitrogen oxides. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.


National Research Council. (1983) Acid deposition: atmospheric processes in eastern North America, a review of
       current scientific understanding. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.


Natori, T.; Totsuka, T. (1980) [Effects of short or long term fumigation with NO2 on plant's factors controlling
       NO2 sorption rate]. Taiki Osen Gakkaishi  15: 329-333.


Neighbour, E. A.; Cottam, D. A.; Mansfield,  T. A. (1988) Effects of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide on
       the control of water loss by birch (Betula spp.). New Phytol. 108: 149-157.
         August  1991
                                                 9-176
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Nelson, R. S.; Ryan, S. A.; Harper, J. E. (1983) Soybean mutants lacking constitutive nitrate recfuctase activity:
       I. selection and initial plant characterization. Plant Physiol. 72: 503-509.


Nieboer, E.; MacFarlane, J. D.; Richardson, D. H. S. (1984) Modification of plant cell buffering capacities by
       gaseous air pollutants. In: Koziol, M. J.; Whatley, F. R., eds. Gaseous air pollutants and plant
       metabolism: [proceedings of the 1st international symposium on air pollution and plant metabolism;
       August 1982; Oxford, United Kingdom]. London, United Kingdom: Butterworths; pp. 313-330.


Nishimura, H.; Hayamizu, T.; Yanagisawa, Y. (1986) Reduction of NO2 to NO by rush and other plants.
       Environ. Sci. Technol. 20: 413-416.


Nobel, P. S. (1974) Introduction to biophysical plant physiology. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman and
       Company.


Norby, R. J.; Weerasuriya, Y.; Hanson,  P. J. (1989) Induction of nitrate reductase activity in red spruce needles
       by NO2 and HNO3 vapor. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 889-896.


O'Neill,  S. D.; Bennett, A. B.; Spanswick, R. M. (1983) Characterization of a NO3" sensitive H+  ATPase from
       corn roots. Plant Physiol. 72: 837-846.


Oghoghorie, C. G. O.; Pate, J. S. (1972) Exploration of the nitrogen transport system of a nodulated legume
       using I5N. Planta 104: 35-49.


Okano, K.; Totsuka, T.  (1986) Absorption of nitrogen dioxide by sunflower plants grown at various levels of
       nitrate. New Phytol. 102: 551-562.


Okano, K.; Ito, O.; Takeba, G.; Shimizu, A.; Totsuka, T. (1984a) Effects of NO2 and O3 alone or in
       combination on kidney bean plants: V. 13C-assimilate partitioning as affected by NO2 and/or O3. Res.
       Rep. Natl. Inst.  Environ. Stud. Jpn. 66: 49-58.


Okano, K.; Tatsami, J.; Yoneyama, T.; Kono, Y.; Totsuka,  T. (1984b) Comparison  of the fates of 15NO2 and
       13CO2 absorbed through a leaf of rice plants. Res. Rep. Natl. Inst. Environ. Stud. Jpn. 66: 59-67.


Okano, K.; Ito, O.; Takeba, G.; Shimizu, A.; Totsuka, T. (1985a) Effects of O3 and NO2 alone or in
       combination on the distribution of 13C-assimilate in kidney bean plants. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 54: 152-159.


Okano, K.; Totsuka, T.; Fukuzawa, T.; Tazaki, T. (1985b) Growth responses of plants to various concentrations
       of nitrogen dioxide. Environ. Pollut. Ser. A 38: 361-373.


Okano, K.; Fukuzawa, T.; Tazaki, T.; Totsuka, T. (1986) 15N dilution method for estimating the absorption of
       atmospheric NO2 by plants. New Phytol. 102: 73-84.


Okano, K.; Machida, T.; Totsuka, T. (1988) Absorption of atmospheric NO2 by several herbaceous species:
       estimation by the I5N dilution method. New Phytol. 109:  203-210.


Okano, K.; Machida, T.; Totsuka, T. (1989) Differences in ability of NO2 absorption in various broad-leaved
       tree species. Environ. Pollut. 58: 1-17.


Oleksyn, J. (1984) Effects  of SO2, HF and NO2 on net photosynthetic and dark respiration rates of Scots pine
       needles of various ages. Photosynthetica 18: 259-262.


Ormrod, D. P.; Tingey, D. T.; Gumpertz, M. L.; Olszyk, D. M. (1984) Utilization  of a response surface
       technique in the study of plant responses to ozone and sulfur dioxide mixtures. Plant Physiol. 75:  43-48.
         August  1991
                                                 9-177
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
Pace, G. M.; Volk, R. J.; Jackson, W. A. (1990) Nitrate reduction in response to CO2-4imited photosynthesis:
        relationship to carbohydrate supply and nitrate reductase activity in maize seedlings. Plant Physiol.
        92: 286-292.


Palmer, H. B.; Seery, D. J. (1973) Chemistry of pollutant formation in flames. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.      '.
        24:235-262.


Pande, P. C. (1985) An examination of the sensitivity of five barley cultivars to SO2 pollution. Environ. Pollut.,
        Ser. A 37: 27-41.


Pande, P. C.; Mansfield, T. A. (1985) Responses of spring barley to SO2 and NO2 pollution.  Environ. Pollut.   i
        Ser. A 38: 87-97.


Pate, J. S. (1983) Distribution of metabolites. In: Steward, F. C., ed. Nitrogen metabolism: v. 8, plant
        physiology: a treatise. New York, NY: Academic Press; pp. 335-395.


Pauling, L. (1953) General chemistry. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman and Co.; pp. 372-375.


Peirson, D. R.; Elliott, J. R. (1988) Effect of nitrite and bicarbonate on nitrite utilization in leaf tissue of bush
        bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). J. Plant Physiol. 133: 425-429.


Pell, E. J.; Pearson, N.  S. (1984) Ozone-induced reduction in quantity and quality of two potato cultivars.
        Environ. Pollut. Ser. A 35: 345-352.                                                             ;


Penning de Vries, F. W. T.  (1982) Crop production in relation  to availability of nitrogen. In: Penning de Vries;
        van Laar, H. H., eds. Simulation of plant growth and crop production. Wageningen, The Netherlands:
        Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation; pp. 213-240.                        .


Petitte, J.  M.; Ormrod, D. P. (1984) Effects of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide on four  Solarium tuberosum
        L. cultivars. Am. Potato J. 61: 319-329.


Petitte, J.  M.; Ormrod, D. P. (1986) Factors affecting intumescence development on potato leaves. HortScience
        21: 493-495.                                                                             •      {  ,


Petitte, J.  M.; Ormrod, D. P. (1988) Effects of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide on shoot and root growth
        of Kennebec and Russet Burbank potato plants. Am.  Potato J. 65: 517-527.


Pfafflin, J. P.; Ziegler, E. N. (1981)  Solubility equilibria of nitrogen dioxide and oxyacids in dilute aqueous
        solutions. Ad. Environ. Sci. Eng. 4:  1-45.


Prasad,  B. J.; Rao, D. N. (1980) Alterations in metabolic pools of nitrogen dioxide exposed wheat plants. Indian
       J.  Exp. Biol. 18: ,879-882.


Priebe, A.; Klein, H.; Jaeger, H.-J. (1978) Role of polyamines  in SO2-polluted pea plants. J.  Exp. Bot.
       29: 1045-1050.


Pryor, W. A.; Lightsey, J. W. (1981) Mechanisms of nitrogen dioxide reactions: initiation of lipid peroxidation '
       and the production of nitrous acid. Science (Washington, DC) 214: 435-437.


Pryor, W. A.; Church, D. F.; Govindan, C.  K.; Crank, G. (1982) Oxidation of thiols by nitric oxide and
       nitrogen dioxide: synthetic utility and toxicological implications.  J. Org. Chem.  47: 156-159.
         August 1991
                                                 9-178
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
 Purczeld, P.; Chon, C. J.; Partis, A. R., Jr,; Heldt, H. W.; Heber, U. (1978) The mechanism of the control of
         carbon fixation by the pH in the 'chloroplast stroma: studies with nitrite-mediated proton transfer across
         the envelope. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 501: 488-498.


 Rajagopal, V.; Rao, N. G. P.; Sinha,  S, K. (1976) Nitrate reductase in Sorghum: I. variation in cultivars during
         growth and development. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 36: 156-161.


 Rao, L. V. M.;  Rajasekhar, V. K.;  Sopory, S. K.; Mukherjee, S. G. (1981) Phytochrome regulation of nitrite
         reductase - a chloroplast enzyme - in etiolated maize leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 22: 577-582.


 Raven, J. A. (1988) Acquisition of nitrogen by the shoots of land plants: its occurrence and implications for
         acid-base regulation. New Phytol. 109: 1-20.


 Reinert, R. A.; Gray, T. N. (1981) The response of radish to nitrogen dioxide,  sulfur dioxide, and ozone, alone
         and in combination. J. Environ. Qual. 10: 240-243.


 Reinert, R. A.; Sanders,  J. S. (1982) Growth of radish and marigold following repeated exposure to nitrogen
         dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and ozone. Plant Dis. 66: 122-124.


 Reinert, R. A.; Heagle, A. S.; Heck, W. W.  (1975) Plant responses to pollutant combinations. In: Mudd, J. B.;
         Kozlowski, T.  T., eds. Responses of plants to air pollution. New York, NY: Academic Press;
         pp. 159-177.            .    ' •


 Reinert, R. A.; Shriner, D.  S.; Rawlings, J.  O. (1982) Responses of radish to all combinations of three
         concentrations of nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and ozone. J. Environ. Qual. 11: 52-57.


 Remmler, J. L.; Campbell, W. H. (1986) Regulation of corn leaf nitrate reductase: II. synthesis and turnover of
         the enzyme's activity and protein. Plant Physiol.  80: 442-447.


 Rhodes, D.; Rendon, G. A.; Stewart,  G. R.  (1976) The regulation of anmmonia assimilating enzyme in Lemma
         minor. Planta 129: 203-210.

 Roberts, T. M.; Darrall, N. M.; Lane, P. (1983) Effects of gaseous air pollutants on agriculture and forestry in
         the UK. Adv. Appl. Biol. 9: 1-142.


 Robinson, J. M. (1986) Carbon dioxide and nitrite photoassimilatory processes do not intercompete for reducing
         equivalents in spinach and soybean leaf chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 80: 676-684.


 Robinson, J. M. (1988) Spinach leaf chloroplast CO2 and NO2- photoassimilations do not compete for
         photogenerated reductant: manipulation of reductant levels by quantum flux density titrations. Plant
         Physiol. 88:  1373-1380.


 Robinson, D. C.; Wellburn, A. R.  (1983) Light-induced changes in the quenching of 9-amino-acridine
         fluorescence by photosynthetic membranes due to atmospheric pollutants and their products. Environ.
         Pollut. Ser. A  32: 109-120.


, Roehm, J. N.; Hadley, J. G.; Menzel, D. B.  (1971) Oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids by ozone and nitrogen
         dioxide: a common mechanism of action. Arch. Environ. Health 23: 142-148.


 Rogers, H. H.; Jeffries, H.  E.; Stahel, E. P.; Heck, W.  W.; Ripperton, L. A.; Witherspoon, A.  M. (1977)
         Measuring air pollutant uptake by plants: a direct kinetic technique. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc.
         27:  1192-1197.
         August 1991
                                                   9-179
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Rogers, H. H.; Campbell, J. C.; Volk, R. J. (1979a) Nitrogen-15 dioxide uptake and incorporation by Phaseolus
       vulgaris (L.). Science (Washington, DC) 206: 333-335.


Rogers, H. H.; Jeffries, H.  E.; Witherspoon, A. M. (1979b) Measuring air pollutant uptake by plants: nitrogen
       dioxide. J. Environ. Qual. 8: 551-557.


Rowland, A. J. (1985) Fluxes of nitrogen and carbon in barley exposed to NO2 [Ph.D. thesis]. Lancaster, United
       Kingdom: University of Lancaster.


Rowland, A. J. (1986) Nitrogen uptake, assimilation and transport in barley in the presence of atmospheric
       nitrogen dioxide.  Plant Soil 91: 353-356.


Rowland, A.; Murray, A. J. S.; Wellburn, A. R. (1985) Oxides of nitrogen and their impact upon vegetation.
       Rev. Environ. Health 5: 295-342.


Rowland, A. J.; Drew, M.  C.; Wellburn, A. R. (1987) Foliar entry and incorporation of atmospheric nitrogen
       dioxide into barley plants of different nitrogen status. New Phytol. 107: 357-371.


Rowland-Bamfbrd, A. J.; Drew, M. C. (1988) The influence of plant nitrogen status on NO2 uptake, NO2
       assimilation and on  the gas exchange characteristics of barley plants exposed to atmospheric NO2. J. Exp.
       Bot. 39: 1287-1297.


Rowland-Bamfbrd, A. J.; Lea,  P. J.; Wellburn, A. R. (1989) NO2 flux into leaves of nitrate reductase-deficient
       barley mutants and corresponding changes in nitrate reductase activity. Environ. Exp. Bot.  29: 439-444.


Rowlands, J. R.; Cause, E. M. (1971) Reaction of nitrogen dioxide with blood and lung components: electron
       spin resonance studies.  Arch. Intern. Med. 128: 94-100.


Runeckles, V. C.; Palmer, K. (1987) Pretreatment with nitrogen dioxide modifies plant response to ozone.
       Atmos. Environ. 21: 717-719.


Runge, M. (1983) Physiology and ecology of nitrogen nutrition. In: Lange, O. L.; Nobel,  P. S.; Osmond,
       C. B.; Ziegler, H.,  eds. Physiological plant ecology El: responses to  the  chemical and biological
       environment. Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany: Springer-Verlag;  pp.  163-200.  [Encyclopedia of
       plant psychology; new series: volume 12C].


Sabaratnam, S.; Gupta, G. (1988)  Effects of nitrogen dioxide on biochemical  and physiological characteristics of
       soybean. Environ. Pollut. 55: 149-158.


Sabaratnam, S.; Gupta, G.;  Mulchi, C. (1988a) Effects of nitrogen dioxide on leaf chlorophyll and nitrogen
       content of soybean.  Environ. Pollut. 51: 113-120.


Sabaratnam, S.; Gupta, G.;  Mulchi, C. (1988b) Nitrogen dioxide effects on photosynthesis in soybean.
       J. Environ.  Qual. 17: 143-146.


Saltzman, B. E. (1954) Colorimetric microdetermination of nitrogen dioxide in the atmosphere. Anal. Chem.
       26: 1949-1955.


Sanders, J. S.; Reinert, R. A. (1982a) Screening azalea cultivars for sensitivity to nitrogen dioxide, sulfur
       dioxide, and ozone  alone and in mixtures. J. Am. Soc. Hortic.  Sci.  107:  87-90.


Sanders, J. S.; Reinert, R. A. (1982b) Weight changes of radish and marigold exposed at three ages to NO2,
       SO2, and O3 alone and in mixture. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 107:  726-730.
         August 1991
                                                 9-180
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Sandhu, R.; Gupta, G. (1989) Effects of nitrogen dioxide on growth and yield of black turtle bean (Phaseolus
       vulgaris L.) cv. 'Domino.' Environ. Pollut. 59: 337-344.


Saxe, H. (1986a) Effects of NO, NO2 and CO2 on net photosynthesis, dark respiration and transpiration of pot
       plants. New Phytol. 103: 185-197.


Saxe, H. (1986b) Stomatal-dependent and stomatal-independent uptake of NOX. New Phytol. 103:  199-205.


Saxe, H.; Christensen, O. V. (1984) Effects of carbon dioxide with and without nitric oxide pollution on growth,
       morphogenesis and production time of potted plants. Acta Hortic. 162: 179-185.


Saxe, H.; Christensen, O. V. (1985) Effects of carbon dioxide with and without nitric oxide pollution on growth,
       morphogenesis and production time of pot plants. Environ.  Pollut.  Ser. A 38: 159-169.


Saxe, H.; Murali, N.  S. (1989) Diagnostic parameters for selecting against novel spruce (Picea abies) decline:
       II. response of photosynthesis and transpiration to acute NOX exposures.  Physiol. Plant. 76: 349-355.


Schloemer, R. H.; Garrett, R.  H. (1974) Nitrate transport system in Neurospora crassa. J.  Bacteriol.
        118: 259-269.


Schreiber, U.; Vidaver, W.; Runeckles, V. C.; Rosen, P. (1978) Chlorophyll fluorescence assay for ozone injury
       in intact plants. Plant Physiol. 61: 80-84.


Schubert, K. R.; Wolk, C. P. (1982) The energetics of biological nitrogen fixation; a workshop summary.
       Rockville,  MD: American Society of Plant Physiolologists; pp. 30.


Schwartz, S. E.; White, W. H. (1981) Solubility equilibria of the nitrogen oxides and oxyacids in dilute aqueous
       solution. Adv. Environ. Sci. Eng. 4: 1-45.


Segal, I. H. (1975) Enzyme Kinetics. New York, NY: John Wiley Press.


Serrano, A.; Rivas, J.; Losada, M. (1981) Nitrate and nitrite as 'in vivo' quenchers of chlorophyll fluorescence
        in blue-green  algae. Photosynth. Res.  2: 175-184.


Sharkey, T. D.; Imai, K.; Farquhar, G. D.; Cowan, I. R. (1982) A direct confirmation of the standard method
        of estimating intercerllular partial pressure of CO2.  Plant Physiol. 69: 657-659.


Shimazaki, K.-I. (1988) Thylakoid membrane reactions to air pollutants. In: Schulte-Hostede, S.;  Darrall, N. M.;
        Blank, L. W.; Wellburn, A. R., eds.  Air pollution and plant metabolism: [proceedings of the 2nd
        international symposium]; March 1987; Munich,  Federal Republic of Germany. Barking,  United
        Kingdom:  Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Ltd.; pp. 116-133.


Siddiqi,  M. Y.; Glass, A. D. M.; Ruth, T. J.; Rufty, T. W., Jr. (1990) Studies of the uptake of nitrate in barley.
        I: kinetics of  13NO" influx.  Plant Physiol. 93: 1426-1432.


Sinn, J.  P.; Pell, E. J. (1984)  Impact of repeated nitrogen dioxide  exposures on composition and  yield of potato
        foliage and tubers. J. Am.  Soc. Hortic. Sci. 109: 481-484.


Sinn, J.  P.; Pell, E. J.; Kabel, R. L. (1984) Uptake rate of nitrogen dioxide by potato plants.  J. Air Pollut.
        Control Assoc. 34: 668-669.


Skarby,  L.; Bengtson, C.; Bostrom, C.-A.; Grennfelt, P.; Troeng, E. (1981) Uptake of NOX in Scots pine. Silva
        Fenn. 15:  396-398.
          August 1991
                                                  9-181
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
 Skeffington, R. A.; Roberts, T. M. (1985a) Effects of ozone and acid mist on Scots pine seedlings. Oecologia
        65:201-206.                                       •    -


 Skeffington, R. A.; Roberts, T. M. (1985b) Effects of ozone and acid mist on Scots pine and Norway spruce -
        an experimental study. VDI Ber. 560: 747-760.


 Skelly, J. M.; Moore, L. D.; Stone, L. L. (1972) Symptom expression of eastern white pine located near a
        source of oxides of nitrogen and sulfur dioxide. Plant Dis. Rep. 56: 3-6.


 Soderlund, R. (1981) Dry and wet deposition of nitrogen compounds. In:  Clark, F. E.; Rosswall, T., eds.
        Terrestrial nitrogen cycles. Ecol. Bull. 33: 123-130.


 Spierings, F. H. F. G. (1971) Influence of fumigations with NO2 on growth and yield of tomato plants. Neth. J.
        Plant Pathol. 77: 194-200.                                    •        '


 Srivastava, H. S.;  Ormrod, D. P. (1984) Effects of nitrogen dioxide and nitrate nutrition on growth and nitrate
        assimilation in bean leaves. Plant Physiol. 76: 418-423.


 Srivastava, H. S.;  Ormrod, D. P. (1986) Effects of nitrogen dioxide and nitrate nutrition on nodulation,
        nitrogenase activity,  growth, and nitrogen content of bean plants. Plant Physiol. 81: 737-741.


 Srivastava, H. S.;  Ormrod, D. P. (1989) Nitrogen dioxide and nitrate nutrition effects on nitrate reductase
        activity and nitrate content of bean leaves. Environ. Exp. Bot. 29: 433-438.       '   ;


 Srivastava, H. S.; Jolliffe, P. A.;  Runeckles, V. C. (1975a) Inhibition of gas exchange in bean leaves by NO2.
        Can. J. Bot. 53: 466-474.


 Srivastava, H. S.; Jolliffe, P. A.;  Runeckles, V. C. (1975b) The effects of environmental conditions on the
        inhibition of leaf gas exchange by NO2. Can. J. Bot. 53:  475-482.


 Srivastava, H. S.; Jolliffe, P. A.;  Runeckles, V. C. (1975c) The  influence of nitrogen supply during growth on
        the inhibition of gas exchange and visible damage to leaves by NO2. Environ. Pollut.  9: 35-47.


 Srivastava, H. S.; Ormrod, D. P.; Hale Marie, B. (1990) Photosynthetic photon flux effects on bean response to
        nitrogen dioxide. Environ. Exp. Bot. 30: 463-467.


 Steer, B. T. (1982) Nitrogen and nitrate accumulation in species having different relationships between nitrate
        uptake and reduction. Ann. Bot. 49: 191-198.


 Stephen, H.; Stephen, T. (1963) Solubilities of inorganic and organic compounds: v.  1, part 1. New York, NY:
        Macmillan.


 Stern, A. C. (1986) Air pollution, v. VI, supplement to air pollutants, their transformation, transport, and
        effects. Academic'Press Inc.; pp. 483.                    ;


 Steubing, L.; Fangmeier, A.; Both, R.; Frankenfeld, M. (1989) Effects of SO2, NO2, and O3 on population
        development and morphological and physiological parameters of native herb layer species in a beech
        forest. Environ. Pollut. 58: 281-302.


Stone, L. L.; Skelly, J. M. (1974) The growth of two forest tree  species adjacent to a periodic source of air     '
       pollution. Phytopathology  64: 773-778.


Taiz, L. (1984) Plant cell expansion: regulation of cell wall mechanical properties. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.
       35: 585-651.
         August 1991
                                                 9-182
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34  .
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Takeuchi, Y.; Nihira, J.; Kondq, N.; Te/uka, T. (1985) Change in nitrate-reducing activity in squash seedlings
       with NO2 fumigation. Plant Cell Physiol. 26: 1027-1035.


Taylor, O. C. (1973), Acute responses of plants to aerial pollutants. Adv. Chem. 122: 9-20.


Taylor, H. J.; Bell, J. N. B. (1988) Studies on the tolerance to SO2 of grass populations in polluted areas:
       V. investigations into the development of tolerance to SO2 and NO2 in combination and NO2 alone. New
       Phytol.  110: 327-338.       ;


Taylpr, O. C.; Eaton, F. M. (1966) Suppression of plant growth by nitrogen dioxide. Plant Physiol.
       41: 132-135.                          .


Taylor, O. C.; MacLean, D. C. (1970) Nitrogen oxides and the peroxyacyl nitrates. In: Jacobson, J. S.; Hill,
       A. C., eds. Recognition of air pollution injury to vegetation: a pictorial atlas. Pittsburgh, PA: Air
       Pollution Control Association; pp. E1-E14.


Taylor, O. C.; Thompson, C. R.; Tingey, D. T.; Reinert, R. A. (1975) Oxides of nitrogen. In: Responses of
       plants to air pollution. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.; pp. 121-139.


Thomas, M. D.; Hill, G. R., Jr. (1935) Absorption of sulphur dioxide by alfalfa and its relation to leaf injury.
       Plant Physiol. 10: 291-307.


Thomas, R. J.; Hipkin,  C. R.; Syrett, P. J. (1976) The interaction of nitrogen  assimilation with photosynthesis
       in nitrogen deficient cells of Chlorella. Planta 133:  9-13.


Thompson, C. R.; Hensel, E. G.; Kats, G.; Taylor, O.  C.  (1970) Effects of continuous exposure of navel
       oranges to nitrogen dioxide. Atmos. Environ. 4: 349-355.


Thompson, C. R.; Kats, G.; Hensel, E, G.  (1971) Effects of ambient levels of NO2 on navel oranges. Environ.,
       Sci. Technol. 5: 1017-1019.

Thompson, C. R.; Kats, G.; Lennox, R. W, (1980) Effects of SO2 and/or NO2 on native plants of the Mojave
       desert and eastern Mojave-Colorado desert. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 30: 1304-1309.


Thomson, W. W. (1975) Effects of air pollutants on plant ultrastructure. In:  Mudd, J.  B.; Kozlowski, T. T.,
       eds. Responses of plants to air pollution. New York, NY: Academic Press; pp. 179-194. (Kozlowski,
       T. T., ed. Physiological ecology: a series of monographs, texts, and treatises).
                                                                                I       -  ,
Tingey, D. T. J.; Reinert, R. A.; Dunning, J. A.; Heck, W. W. (1971) Vegetation injury from the interaction of
       nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Phytopathology 61: 1506-1511.


Tolley, G. A.;  Randall, A.; Blomquist, G.; Fabian, R.; Fishelson, G.; Frankel, A.; Hoehn, J.; Krumm, R.;
        Mensah,  E.; Smith,  T. (1986) Establishing and valuing the effects of improved visibility in eastern
        United States. Washington, DC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.


Totsuka,  T.; Sato, S.; Yoneyama, T.; Ushijima, T. (1978) [Response of plants to  atmospheric NO2 fumigation:
        (2) effects of NO2 fumigation on dry matter growth'of sunflower and kidney bean plants]. In: Studies on
        evaluation and amelioration of air pollution by plants: progress report in 1976-1977; NIBS R-2;
        pp. 77-87.


Touraine, B.;  Grignon, N.;  Grignon,  C. (1988) Charge balance in NQ3' fed soybean: estimation of K+ and
        carboxylate recirculation.  Plant Physiol. 88: 605-612.
          August 1991
                                                  9-183       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
46
47
48
49
50
51
 Troiano, J. J.; Leone, I. A. (1977) Changes in growth rate and nitrogen content of tomato plants after exposure
        to NO2. Phytopathology 67: 1130-1133.


 Troshin, A. S. (1966) Problems of cell permeability. Rev. ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Pergamon Press.


 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1982) Air quality criteria for oxides of nitrogen. Research Triangle
        Park, NC: Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Environmental Criteria and Assessment
        Office; EPA report no. EPA-600/8-82-026. Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB83-131011.


 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1986) Air quality criteria for ozone and other photochemical oxidants
        [draft final]. Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of Health and Environmental Assessment,
        Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office; EPA report nos. EPA-600/8-84-020aF-eF. Available
        from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB87-142949.


 Van der Eerden, L. J. M. (1982) Toxicity of ammonia to plants. Agric. Environ. 7: 223-235.


 van Haut, H.  (1975) Kurzzeitversuche zur Ermittlung der relativen Phytotoxizitaet von Stickstoffdioxid
        [Short-term tests to determine the relative phytotoxicity of nitrogen dioxide]. Staub Reinhalt. Luft
        35: 187-193.


 van Haut, H.; Stratmann, H. (1967) Experimentelle Untersuchungen ueber die Wirkung von Stichstoffdioxid auf
        Pflanzen [Experimental investigations of the effect of nitrogen dioxide on plants]. Schriftenr. LIB
        Landesanst. Immissions Bodennutzungsschutz Landes Nordrhe'in Westfalen 7: 50-70.


 Van Keulen, H.; Goudriaan, J.;  Seligman, N. G. (1989) Modelling the effects of nitrogen on canopy
        development and crop growth. In: Russell,  G.; Marshall, B.; Jarvis, P. G. Plant, eds. Canopies: their
        growth, form and function. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; pp. 83-104.


 Vanecko, S.; Varner, J.  E. (1955) Studies on nitrite metabolism in higher plants.  Plant Physiol. 30: 388-390.


 Varhelyi, G. (1980) Dry deposition of atmospheric sulphur and nitrogen oxides. Idojaras 89: 15-20.


 Walker, D. A.; Crofts, A. R. (1970) Photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 39: 389-428.


 Wallace, W.; Steer, B. T. (1983) Isolation of Capsicum annuum leaf nitrate reductase and characterization of the
        effect of adenine nucleotides and NADH on its activity. Plant Cell Environ. 6: 5-11.


 Wallsgrove, R. M.; Lea, P. J.; Miflin, B. J. (1979) Distribution of the enzymes of nitrogen assimilation within
        the pea leaf cell. Plant Physiol. 63:  232-236.


 Wellbum, A. (1988) Air pollution and acid rain: the biological impact. London, United Kingdom: Longman
        Scientific & Technical.


 Wellburn, A. R. (1982a) Bioenergetic and ultrastructural changes associated with chloroplast development. Int.   '
        Rev. Cytol. 80:  133-191.                                       ,


Wellbum, A. R. (1982b) Effects of SO2 and NO2 on metabolic function. In: Unsworth, M. H.; Ormrod, D. P.,
        eds. Effects of gaseous air pollution in agriculture and horticulture. London, United Kingdom:
        Buttenvorth Scientific; pp. 169-187.                      '
         August 1991
                                                9-184
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38'
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Wellburn, A. R. (1984) The influence of atmospheric pollutants and their cellular products upon
       photophosphorylation and related events. In: Koziol, M. J.; Whatley, F. R., eds. Gaseous air pollutants
       and plant metabolism:  proceedings of the 1st international symposium on air pollution and plant
       metabolism; August 1982; Oxford, United Kingdom. London, United Kingdom: Butterworths;
       pp. 203-221.

Wellburn, A- R- (1985) Ion chromatographic determination of levels of anions in plastids from fumigated and
       non-fumigated barley seedlings. New Phytol.  100: 329-339.


Wellburn, A. R. (1990) Why are atmospheric oxides of nitrogen usually phytotoxic and not alternative fertilizers?
       New Phytol. 115: 395-429.                                         '      '


Wellburn, A. R.; Majemik, O.; Wellburn, F. A. M. (1972) Effects of SO2 and NO2 polluted air upon the
       ultrastructure of chloroplasts. Environ. Pollut. 3: 37-49.


Wellburn, A. R.; Capron, T. M.; Chan,  H.-S.; Horsman, D. C. (1976) Biochemical effects of atmospheric
       pollutants on plants. In: Mansfield, T. A.,  ed. Effects of air pollutants on plants. Cambridge,  United
       Kingdom: Cambridge University  Press; pp. 105-114.


Wellburn, A. R.; Wilson, J.; Aldridge, P. H,  (1980) Biochemical responses of plants to nitric oxide polluted
       atmospheres. Environ.  Pollut. Ser. A 22: 219-228.


Wellburn, A. R.; Higginson, C.; Robinson, D,; Walmsley, C. (1981) Biochemical explanations of more than
       additive inhibitory effects of low atmospheric levels of sulphur dioxide plus nitrogen dioxide upon plants.
       New Phytol. 88: 223-237.

White, K. L.; Hill, A. C.; Bennett, J. H, (1974) Synergistic inhibition of apparent photosynthesis rate of alfalfa
       by combinations of sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. Environ. Sci. Technbl. 8t 574-576.


White, M, C.;  Decker, A. M.; Chaney,  R. L. (1981) Metal complexation in xylem fluid: 1. chemical
       composition of tomato and soybean stem exudate. Ann. Phys. 67; 292-300.


Whitmore, M.  E. (1985) Relationship between dose of SO2 and N02 mixtures and growth of Poa pratensis. New
       Phytol. 99: 545-553.

Whitmore, M.  E.; Freer-Smith, P. H. (1982) Growth effects of SO2 and/or NO2 on woody plants and grasses
        during  spring and summer. Nature (London) 300: 55-57.

Whitmore, M.  E.; Mansfield,  T. A. (1983) Effects of long-term exposures to SO2 and NO2 on Poa pratensis and
        other grasses. Environ. Pollut. Ser.  A 31:  217-235.

Whitmore, M.  E.; Freer-Smith, P. H.; Davies, T. (1982) Some effects of low concentrations of SO2 and/or NO2
        on the  growth of grasses and poplar. In: Proceedings of the 32nd conference of the University of
        Nottingham, Easter School of Agricultural Science; pp. 483-485.

 Willix, R. (1976) Appendix I. An introduction to the chemistry of atmospheric pollutants. In: Mansfield, T. A.,
        ed.  Effects of air pollutants on plants. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press;
        pp. 161-184.

 Wingsle, G.; Nasholm, T.; Lundmark, T.; Ericsson, A. (1987) Induction of nitrate reductase in needles of Scots
        pine seedlings by NOX and NO3". Physiol.  Plant. 70: 399-403.
          August 1991
                                                  9-185
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
51
52
53
 Wolfenden, J.; Wellbum, A. R. (1986) Cellular readjustment of barley seedlings to simulated acid rain New
        Phytol.  104: 97-109.                  '    .   .              "


 Woo, K. C.; Flugge, U. I.; Heldt, H.  W. (1987) A two translocator model for the transport of 2-oxoglutarate
        and glutamate in chloroplasts during ammonia assimilation in the light. Plant Physiol. 84: 624-632.


 Woodlin, S.; Press, M. C.; Lee, J. A.  (1985) Nitrate reductase activity in Sphagnum fuscum in relation to wet
        deposition of nitrate from the atmosphere.  New Phytol. 99: 381-388.


 Wright, E. A. (1987) Effects of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide, singly and in mixture, on the macroscopic
        growth of three birch clones. Environ. Pollut. 46: 209-221.


 Yang, Y.-S.; Skelly, J. M.; Chevone, B. I. (1982) Clonal response of eastern white pine to low doses of O3,
        SO2, and NO2, singly and in combination.  Can. J. For. Res. 12: 803-808.


 Yang, Y.-S.; Skelly, J. M.; Chevone, B. I. (1983a) Sensitivity of eastern white pine clones to acute doses of
        ozone, sulfur dioxide, or nitrogen dioxide. Phytopathology 73: 1234-1237.


 Yang, Y. S.; Skelly, J. M.; Chevone, B. I. (1983b) Effects of pollutant combinations at low doses on growth of
        forest trees. Aquilo Ser. Bot. 19: 406-418.


 Yoneyama, T.; Sasakawa, H. (1979) Transformation of atmospheric NO2 absorbed in spinach leaves Plant Cell
        Physiol. 20: 263-266.


 Yoneyama, T.; Sasakawa, H.; Ishizuka, S.; Totsuka, T. (1979a) Absorption of atmospheric NO2 by plants and
        soils: (II) nitrite accumulation, nitrite reductase activity and diurnal change of NO2 absorption in leaves
        Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 25: 267-275.


 Yoneyama, T.; Totsuka, T.; Hashimoto, A.; Yazaki, J.  (1979b) Absorption of atmospheric NO2 by plants and
        soils. HI. Change in the concentration of inorganic nitrogen in the soil fumigated with NO2: the effect of
        water conditions. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 25:  337-347.


 Yoneyama, T.; Arai, K.; Totsuka, T. (1980a) Transfer of nitrogen and carbon from a mature sunflower leaf -
        I5NO2 and 13CO2 feeding studies. Plant Cell Physiol. 21: 1367-1381.


 Yoneyama, T.; Hashimoto, A.; Totsuka, T. (1980b) Absorption of atmospheric NO2 by plants and soils. IV.
        Two routes of nitrogen uptake by plants  from atmospheric NO2: direct incorporation into aerial plant
        parts and uptake by roots after absorption into the soil.  Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 26: 1-7.


 Yoneyama, T.; Totsuka, T.; Hayakawa, N.; Yazaki, J.  (1980c) Absorption of atmospheric NO2 by plants and
        soils. V. Day and night NO2-fumigation effect on the plant growth and estimation of the amount of
        NO2-nitrogen absorbed by plants. Kokuritsu Kogai Kenkyusho Kenkyu Hokoku 11: 31-50.


 Yoneyama, T.; Yasuda,  T.; Yazaki, J.;  Totsuka, T. (1980d) Absorption of atmospheric NO2 by plants and soils.
        VII. NO2 absorption by plants: re-evaluation of the air-soil-root route. Kokuritsu Kogai Kenkyusho
        Kenkyu Hokoku 11: 59-67.


 Yu, S.-w.; Li, L.; Shimazaki, K.-i. (1988) Response of spinach and kidney bean plants to nitrogen dioxide
        Environ.  Pollut. 55: 1-13.


Yung, K.-H.; Mudd, J. B. (1966) Lipid synthesis in the presence of nitrogenous compounds in Chlorella
        pyrenoidosa. Plant Physiol. 41: 506-509.
         August 1991
                                                 9-186
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Zahn, R. (1975) Begasungsversuche mit NO2 in Kleingewaechshaeusern [Gassing tests with NO2 in small
       greenhouses]. Staub Reinhalt. Luft 35: 194-196.


Zeevaart, A. J. (1974) Induction of nitrate reductase by NO2. Acta Bot. Neerl. 23: 345-346.


Zeevaart, A. J. (1976) Some effects of fumigating plants for short periods with NO2. Environ. Pollut.
       11:  97-1-08.                     ;    »         *  ;
        August 1991
                                                9_187       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
APPENDIX 9A
      August 1991
       9A-1    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
O<"4
32
33

TABLE 9A.
STUDIES
Common Name'
Herbaceous Species:
Vegetable Crops:
Onion
Leek
Tampala
Celeriac

Beet
Swiss chard
Kale
Broccoli
Cabbage
Kohlrabi
Turnip
Green pepper
Chickpea
Endive
Taro

Cucumber
Squash.
Carrot
Strawberry
Woodland strawberry
Sweet potato
Garden lettuce
Tomato
Currant tomato
Parsnip
Parsley


August 1991
SPECIES OF PLANTS USED IN EXPERIMENTAL
ON THE EFFECTS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN
Scientific Name


Allium cepa L.
Allium ampeloprasum L.
Amaranthus tricolor L.
Apium graveolens L. var rapaceum (Mill.) Gaud.-
Beaupr.
Beta vulgaris L.
Beta vulgaris L.
Brassica oleraceae L. var acephala DC
Brassica oleraceae L. var botrytis L.
Brassica oleraceae L. var capitata
Brassica oleraceae L. var gongylodes
Brassica rapa L.
Capsicum annuum L. var annuum
Cicer arietinum L.
Cichorium endivia L.
Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott var antiquorum (Schott)
FJ.Hubb and Rend.
Cucumis sativus L.
Cucurbita maxima Duch.
Daucus carota L. var sativus Hoffm.
Fragaria chiloensis (L.) Duchesne.
Fragaria vesca L.
Ipomea batatas (L.) Lam.
Lactuca saliva L.
Lycopersicon lycopersicum (L.) Karst. ex Farw.
Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (Jusl.) Mill.
Pastinaca sativa L.
Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Nyman ex A.W.Hill


9A-2 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CI

-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
TABLE 9A (cont'd).
STUDIES ON
Common Name"
Green bean
Garden pea
Radish
Rhubarb . . ^
Black salsify
Eggplant
Potato
Spinach
Broad bean
Watermelon
Field crops:
Oats
Sugar beet
Rape
Buckwheat
Soybean
Upland cotton
Common sunflower
Barley
Tobacco
Paddy rice
Castor bean
Common rye
Sesame
Sorghum
Common wheat
Durum wheat
Maize
Forage. Pasture. Turf:
Bentgrass
Redtop
SPECIES OF PLANTS USED IN EXPERIMENTAL
THE EFFECTS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN
Scientific Name
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Pisum sativum L.
Raphanus sativus L.
Rheum rhabarbarum L.
Scorzonera hispanica L.
Solatium melongena L.
Solarium tuberosum L.
Spinacia oleracea L.
Viciafaba L.
Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. and Nakai
Avena sativa L.
Beta vulgaris L.
Brassica napus L.
Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.
Glydne max (L.) Merrill
Gossypium hirsutum L.
Helianthus annuus L.
Hordeum vulgare L.
Nicotiana tabacum L.
Oryza sativa L.
Ricinus communis L.
Secale cereale L.
Sesamum indicum L.
Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench
Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum turgidum L.
Zea mays L.
Agrostis capillaris L.
Agrostis gigantea Roth.
August 1991
9A-3
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
        TABLE 9A (cont'd).
               STUDIES ON
 SPECIES OF PLANTS USED IN EXPERIMENTAL
THE EFFECTS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN
 Common Name*
             Scientific Name
 Creeping bentgrass
 Colonial bentgrass
 Smooth brome
 Orchard grass
 Red fescue
 Italian ryegrass
 Perennial ryegrass
 Alfalfa
 Mat-grass
 Common timothy
 Annual bluegrass
 Kentucky bluegrass
 Red clover
 Crimson clover
 Spring vetch
 Hedge vetch

 Florieultural;
 Flossflower
 Common snapdragon
 Sprenger asparagus
 Begonia
 Hollyhock begonia
 Begonia
 King begonia
 China aster
 Oxeye daisy
Florist's chrysanthemum
Painted leaf
Lily-of-the-valley
Dahlia
             Agrostis stolonifera L. var palustris (Huds.) Farw.
             Agrostis tennis Sibth.
             Bromus inermis Leyss.
             Dactylis glomerata L.
             Festuca rubra L.
             Lolium multiflorum Lam.
             Lolium perenne L.
             Medicago sativa L.
             Nardus stricta L.
             Phleum pratense L.
             Poa annua L.
             Poa pratensis L.
             Trifolium pratense L.
             Trifolium incarnatum L.
             Vicia sativa L.
             Vicia septum


            Ageratum houstonianum Mill.
            Antirrhinum majus L.
            Asparagus densiflorus (Knuth) Jessop Cv. Sprengeri
            Begonia sp.
            Begonia gracilis HBK
            Begonia multiflora Benth.
            Begonia rex Putz.
            Callistephus chinensis (L.) Nees
            Chrysanthemum leucanthemum L.
            Chrysanthemum ~Xmorifolium Ramat.
            Coleus shirensis Giirke
            Convalaria majalis L.
            Dahlia pinnata Cav.
        August 1991
                                            9A-4
                         DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
 19
20
21
22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
       TABLE 9A (cont'd).
              STUDIES ON
Common Name"
 SPECIES OF PLANTS USED IN EXPERIMENTAL
THE EFFECTS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN
                  =====
             Scientific Name
Dumb cane
Golden pothos
Spring heather
Summer hyacinth
Garden gladiolus
Plantain lily
Patience plant
Japanese morning-glory
Palm-Beach-bells
Sweet pea
Daffodil
Boston fern
Garden geranium
Geranium
Common garden petunia
Fairy primrose
German primrose
 Common African violet ,
 Common salvia
 Baby'srtears
 French marigold
 Tulip
 Periwinkle
 Common periwinkle
 Common zinnia

 Weeds and Native:
 Bear's garlic
 Redroot
 Adam-and-Eve
 Common mugwort
             Dieffenbachia maculata (Lodd.) G.Don
             Epipremnum aureum (Linden and Andr6) Bunt.
             Erica cornea L.
             Galtonia candicans (Bak.) Decne.
             Gladiolus Xhortulanus L.H.Bailey
             Hosta sp.
             Impatiens wallerana Hook. f.
             Ipomoea nil (L.) Roth.
             Kalanchoe blossfeldiana Poelln.
             Lathyrus odoratus L.
             Narcissus pseudonarcissus L.
             Nephrolepis exaltata (L.) Schott
             Pelargonium Xhortorum L.H.Bailey
             Pelargonium zonale (L.) L'Her. ex Ait.
             Petunia Xhybrida Hort. Vilm.-Andr.
             Primula malacoides Franch.
             Primula obconica Hance
             Saintpaulia ionantha H.Wendl.
             Salvia  officinalis L.
             Soleirolia soleirolii (Req.) Dandy
              Tagetes patula L.
              Tulipa gesnerana L.
              Vinca  sp.
              Vinca  minor L.
              Zinnia elegans Jacq.


              Allium ursinum L.
              Amaranthus retrofl.ex.us L.
              Arum  maculatum L.
              Artemesia vulgaris L.               	
         August 1991
                                             9A_5       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7


8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

26
27
28
29
30
31
32
TABLE 9A (cont'd).
STUDIES ON
Common Name*
Desert marigold
Beggar-tick
White mustard
Crunch-weed


Lamb's-quarters
Goosefoot
Canada thistle
Jimsonweed
Crabgrass
Horseweed
Alfilaria
Japanese clover
Lupine
Mallow
Wood melic
Mint
Millet grass
Sensitive plant
? Tobacco
Wild tobacco
European wood sorrel
Scorpion weed

Common plantain
Dock
Broad-leaved dock
Bladder campion
Common duckweed
Common dandelion
SPECIES OF PLANTS USED IN EXPERIMENTAL
THE EFFECTS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN
Scientific Name
Baileya pleniradiata Harv. and Gray
Bidens frondosa L. .• . . •
Brassica hirta Moench
Brassica kaber (DC) L. C. Wheeler vax pinnatifida
(Stokes) L.C.Wheeler
Chaenactis carphoclinia Gray
Chenopodium album L.
Chenopodium murale L.
Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.
Datura stramonium L.
Digitaria sp.
Erigeron canadensis L.
Erodium cicutarium (L.) L'Her.
Lespedeza striata (Thunb. ex J.Murr.) Hook, and Arn.
Lupinus angustifolius L.
Malva parviflora L.
Melica uniflora Retz.
Mentha piperita L.
Milium effusum L.
Mimosa pudica L.
Nicotiana glutinosa
Nicotiana rustica L.
Oxalis acetosella L.
Phacelia crenulata Torr. ex S.Wats.
Plantago insularis Eastw.
Plantago major L.
Rumex ambiguous
Rumex obtusifolius L.
Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke
Stellaria media (L.) Cyrillo
Taraxicum qfficinale Weber
August 1991
9A-6     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8


9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
TABLES) A (cont
STUDIES
-^g— ^— =:^=:^ss
!— .
Common Name"
Wood dog violet
Devil's tongue

Trees and Shrubs:
Fruits:


Grapefruit
Sweet orange
Japanese persimmon
Common apple
Peach
Wild pear
Currant
Grape (American hybrids)
Fox grape

Ornamentals:
Japanese aucuba
Bougainvillea
Boxwood
Common camellia
Karanda
Croton
Algerian ivy
English ivy
Benjamin tree
Rubber plant
Hybrid fuchsia
Common gardenia
Chinese hibiscus
Hortensia
Q). 8Jr.ljAx.Ui3 *JC JTJJ^VL^J-U \J\JAX*-r Ail *-*— • ~ 	 •--
ON THE EFFECTS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN
Scientific Name
Viola reichenbachiana Jord. ex Boreau




Citrus aurantium L.
Citrus natsudaidai
Citrus Xparadisi Macfady
Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck
Citrus unshu :
Diospyros kaki L.f.
Malus pumila Mill.
Primus persica (L.) Batsch.
Pyrus communis L.
Ribes sp.
Vitis vinifera
Vitis labrusca L.

Aucuba japonica Thunb.
Bougainvillea spectabilis Willd.
Buxus microphylla-Siebold and Zucc.
Camellia japonica L.
Carissa carandas L.
Codiaeum variegatum (L.) Blume
Hedera canariensis Willd.
Hedera helix L.
FZCMS benjamina L.
Ficzw elastica Roxb. ex Hornem.
Fuchsia Xhybrida Hort. ex Vilm.
Gardenia jasminoides Ellis
Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L.
Hydrangea macrophylla (Thunb. )Ser. subsp.
macrophylla
August 1991
9A_7    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
   7
   8
   9
  10
  11
  12
  13
  14
  15
  16
  17
  18
  19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31

 32
33
34
          TABLE 9A (cont'd).  SPECIES OF PLANTS USED IN EXPERIMENTAL
                 STUDIES ON THE EFFECTS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN
  FJame-of-the-woods
  Glossy privet
  Paperbark tree
  Common oleander
  Fragrant olive
  Japanese pittosporum
  Firethorn
  Azalea
  Catawba rhododendron
  Cultivated rose

  Natural:
  Hedge maple
  Box elder
 Japanese maple
 Norway maple
 Red maple
 Black alder
 White alder
 Burro weed
 Four-wing saltbush
 European white birch
 Downy birch
 European hornbeam
 Hornbeam (?)
 Australian pine
 Desert willow
 Camphor tree

Russian olive
Brittle bush
  Ixora cocdnea L.
  Ligustrum lucidum Ait.
  Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T.Blake
  Nerium oleander L.
  Osmanihus fragmns (Thunb.) Lour.
  Pittosporum tobira (Thunb.) Ait.
  Pyracantha cocdnea MJ.Roem.
  Rhododendron canescens
  Rhododendron catawbiense Michx.
  Rosa sp.
 Acer campestre L.
 Acer negundo L.
 Acer palmatum Thunb.
 Acer platanoides L.
 Acer rubrum L.
 Almts glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.
 Almts incana (L.) Moench
 Ambrosia dumosa (Gray) Payne
 Atriplex canescens (Pursh.) Mutt
 Betula pendula Roth.
 Betula pubescens J.F.Ehrh.
 Carpinus betulus L.
 Carpinus caucasica Gros.
 Casuarina cunninghamiana Miq.
 Chilopsis linearis Cav.
 Cinnamomum camphora (L.) J.Presl.
 Corylus betulus
Elaeagnus angustifolia L.
Enceliafarinosa Gray ex Torr.
        August 1991
                                           9A-8       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
1
2
'3
'4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
TABLE 9A (cont'd).
STUDIES ON
Common Name8
Murray red gum
Spindle tree
European beech
White ash
European ash
Green ash
Maidenhair tree
Honeylocust
English walnut
Creosote bush
Sweetgum
Yellow poplar
Toringo crab apple
American sycamore
Carolina poplar
Black poplar
Hybrid poplar
Hybrid poplar
Sargent cherry
Japanese pear
White oak
Oak
Oak
Shira oak
English oak
Pin oak
Willow oak
Black locust
European elderberry
White beam

SPECIES OF PLANTS USED IN EXPERIMENTAL
THE EFFECTS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN
Scientific Name
Eucalyptus camadulensis Dehnh.
Euonymus japonica Thunb.
Fagus silvatica L.
Fraxinus americana L.
Fraxinus excelsior L.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.
Gingko biloba L.
Gleditsia triacanthos L.
Juglans regia L.
Larrea divaricata Cav.
Liquidambar styraciflua L.
Liriodendron tulipifera L.
Malus Sieboldii (Regel) Rehd.
Platanus occidentalis L.
Populus canadensis Moench
Populus nigra L.
Populus nigra x P. maximowiczii


















Populus maximowiczii x P. planteirensis
Prunus sargentii Rehd.
Pyrus pyrifolia (Burm.f.) Nakai
Quercus alba L.
Quercus iberica Stev.
Quercus imeretina Stev.
Quercus myrsinaefolia Blume
Quercus robur L.
Quercus palustris Muenchh.
Quercus phellos L.
Robinia pseudoacacia L.
Sambucus nigra L.
Sorbus aria (L.) Crantz.














August 1991
9A-9
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
      TABLE 9A (cont'd).  SPECIES OF PLANTS USED IN EXPERIMENTAL
           STUDIES ON THE EFFECTS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Q<
Common Name*
Common lilac
Small-leaved European linden
Large-leaved lime
American elm
Scotch elm
Sweet viburnum

Summer grape
Japanese zelkova
Conifers:
Silver fir
White fir
Nikkofir
Caucasian fir
Deodar cedar
Port-Orford-cedar
Hinoki cypress
Japanese cedar
Shore juniper
European larch
Japanese larch
Norway spruce
White spruce
Blue spruce
Red spruce
Sitka spruce
Japanese red pine
Shortleaf pine
Pine
Mountain pine
Austrian pine
Scientific Name
Syringa vulgaris L.
Tilia cordata Mill.
Tilia platyphyllos Scop.
Ulmus americana L.
Ulrnus glahra Huds.
Viburnum odoratissima Ker-Gawl. var. awabuki
(C.Koch) Zab.
Vitis aestivalis Michx.
Zelkova serrata (Thunb.) Mak.
Abies alba Mill. '
Abies concolor (Gord.) Lindl. ex Hildebr.
Abies homolepis Siebold and Zucc.
Abies nordmanniana (Steven) Spach
Cedrus deodara (D.Don) G.Don
Chamaecyparis lawsoniana (A.Murr.) Parl.
Chamaecyparis obtusa (Siebold and Zucc.) Endl.
Cedrus deodara (Roxb.) Loud.
Juniperus conferta Parl.
Larix decidua Mill.
Larix kaempferi (Lamb.) Carriere
Picea abies (L.) Karst.
Picea glauca (Moench) Voss
Picea pungens Engelm.
Picea rubens Sarg.
Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.
Pinus densiflora Sieb. and Zucc.
Pinus echinata Mill.
Pinus elodarica Medw.
Pinus mugo Turra
Pinus nigra Arnold
August 1991
9A-10    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
TABLE 9A (cont'd).
STUDIES ON
Common Name" .
Cluster pine
Pitch pine
Eastern white pine
Scots pine
Loblolly pine
Japanese black pine
Virginia pine
Douglas-fir
English yew
SPECIES OF PLANTS USED IN EXPERIMENTAL
THE EFFECTS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN
" . Scientific Name
Pinus pinaster Ait.
Pinus rigida Mill.
Pinus strobus L.
Pinus sylvestris L.
Pinus taeda L.
Pinus thunbergiana Franco
Pinus virginiana Mill.
Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco
Taxus baccata L.
14
Lichens:
Anaptychia neoleucomelanena
Lecanora chrysoleuca
Parmelia praesignis
Usnea cavernosa
15
16
17
18
19
a  Common and scientific names given below conform with those in Hortus Third and may differ from those
   used in the original publications.
         August 1991
                                            9A-11
              DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------

-------
                   APPENDIX 9B
August 1991
9B-1   DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
g
•«^

I
         >

         *o
         w
       o"!
         o

         8
           •a

           IB
         O

         O\
                  U
63
Ol ^

is



II
'o «
CO S
         w O
         O 
-------
 *\

B
           i
           1
           t
       §•
       o
       33

       '§
              o\
              M
              W
              o
              ON
              M
               W
               o
ON
M
W
o
8
8
            1
            00
8
                                       CN
                                       ii
                                       O
            M
     M

     S   ^

88  8.   I
                                                      s
                                                      oo
                                                      CN
                                                   "jS   "2
                                       oo
                                       ON
                                        &

                                          *  E°,
                                          §1
                                          +  ^
                                       g o
                                       S •"
                                       <4-l O\

                                           « (fl
                                        •a
                                        ID
                                              ON
                                              t>
                                              ON
                                       •3 „ 3
                                       & c< 'S
                                       HI o iC
                                       O -JS 03
                                         *T-< M

                                       S "§ *•§
                                       I -a
                  c-1
                               C3   ,Cj
                               •T3   *O

                               O   O)
                            VO

                            d
                                     «   gL

                                    t t"
                                                  cs
                                                  d

                                                          .S
                                 \o «•< 03 ^
                                 ^ g-pncS
                                 + S Hi *-<
                                   qj O



                                 list
                                 o I ^
                                 eo F"L -S W)
                                 c§   2 -S

                                 ilg,!

                                 i^ll
                                 511-§
                                                      VO
                                                          i—I 60

                                                          £-S
                                                       S ^"'?
                                                       > ^ H5

                                                       •^ ^Sj1®

                                                      '"S 8 I
                                 I
                                 o
                                 oo
                                                          1
W
O

W
O

                                                               OO
                                                               CN
August 1991
                                     9B-3    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
CO
        s
        C
        •2


        1
       w
I °

o "?s
a, g


m O
   6 g*!
   OT
          B8
                                         8
t







          
O
1
'fcl
o
w
1
s
d
Xl
S
^ a
rt C^
3 Pi
0<0
«w 0
o
8
ffi
s
V^J
»-H
ts
1
tl
o
W3
1
I
1)
w
O
•*
T— i
*
a
CTt
•a
J3
CtJ
T3
>A

-------
1,
2


I
 o


HH
         I
         '§
         0


         P
8
K
             1
ss

        §


       "S


       II
        5T ON
       T3 ^H


       ij? S
        1  CO

       si


       SN|





       |l

    Co" -M o
    r-  So
    ON J5 ^4-



    §" ^ "N




    ^  .- is"
        S ^
        _d "O
        If

        0) C>


          2
Relativ
 oo
 CM


 S
                     w
                     o
      1!
      r^ S
                      *%
     . o


      t>
      ^^
      f, , ON

      05 JS


      "I

      ST
      en ••g'

      M co



      *°- °
      C^- cD
      i-H IS!
      1 ^


      veT'-S'^

      ^—s fit ON
         o mi
        *£3 CO

        ••a §

        "3 S
         Cti K^
      •a

      o
                                   CO

                                   S
                                           in
                                           ON
                      co



                     t

                     CN
                     oo

                     d
                                        *  -J
                                         10
11

•a |  a
                                   •a

                                   OS
                                   O\

                                   o
                                         1^§


                                            ' ta
                            w, O
                            o _r
 o *"
 0 ON
 '  -1
 - * 43
                                           0 vi
                                           -
                                         CN








x— s
H-3
§0
S
-1

S
£;
§
*S
&
-*-»
J
&
60
W
f leaves (-4), mass of stem and leaves (-8), number GH,CE Saltzman
ah mass of fruit (+16), some defoliation.1
976)
p « *"
o5 -«f
•g & |
Pf ^" ig
/—% *£j ' '
^ * en
¥1^
i § ^
^ a «?
^•^ ^ rS
i)«:?
flj O Ci*
a



CO

•U
O
en


en
d



f leaves (-4), mass of stem and leaves (-32),
;-50), fresh mass of fruit (+41), some defoliation.1
° -M
 1 'S
iS"**



CO
>-
^
O
en


VO
C)



August 1991
                              9B-5     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 *b
B
W T~t
S3
          %
8
tt<
        W 0
      8

      I
                                 u

               e
                                     e
'ScS'S
  5
             g <0   vo

             ^
            o
                                             .
                                            S4
                                       CO

                                       d   c>
                                         -S
                                                                    *o
                                                                    -*
555

t- CO   VO
   August 1991
      9B-6    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
51
       fc
thout NO,.)
tion from
Effec
      a
    I is
    'I
    C/3

            8

O
8
         &•  88
      S
8
           .
            1!
                *« •

                  •





                     .




             !£    !!.


                                  ca
                                  £p
                                  -§
8
                                                   6
88



                                                     .
                                                !!«


                                                   t
                            
-------
to
                   e
      o «
(El
3
3
3
                      8
2 S   I    S
-a 3   w    'S
1:3   •§    n
13   I    r
               1

               O
                              CM
                              8 2*
                              tM O

                              10 .i
                              O a?
                              s I
                              •*-» ?

                             co
                              i

                                  ;-
                             r   a
                                                                       op

                                                                       6
                                          w
                                          ES
                                          K
                                          O
                                             t-

                                                   *

                                                   >o


                                *
                                                               N
                                                     05  9
                                                     ^M  03


                                                     I  *s
                                                   s^  S   g  £
                                                            >l
                             5  I

                             rEJ  ^

                             CM CO
           01


           o'
                                     S
       •%
       I
                                           -3
                                            ca
                                           IP
                                        CS  CO

                                        o  o
                                                        oo
                                                                       o
                                                                       co
                                          S3
                                          o
                                      ^  S
                                      S  o

                                      s  i

                                      p-

                                      1  K

                                      §  I
                                      HJ

                                      I
                                                     52



                                                    It
                                                    10 O
                                                    CO W>
                                                                    «_,  o
                                                                    o
                                                                    U
   August 1991
                     9B-8    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
I
1
s
       1 §
         '
       s&
    I1
    00

a
o
                                  CO
                                  PQ
                              e
                         a
                         o
                     i   w
                     o   o
                                        o
                                        s
                                        4-1
                                        o
                                    cs
               <4-i •  t4-t  • Cl_l
               ^ a  o a o „
                CO 9  CO S CQ OO

               Ji  54aw
       -a
      \^


      "S
      -a
            vo

            S
1
a
                          2
                         -6
                         JS
                         "
                       \o

                        S
                                    K
                                    P

                                             i

                                             I
                               ffi K
                               O. O
oo oo  W
O O  O
                                             *
                                             C3\
                                    !
                                   I
                                                  f- oo
                                                  
-------
  
£
            :!
            1

            'g

          §.'
       I
W
O
pf
•g o -3  05
                oi
               13
                              cs
                              u-i
               1
               1
               ,g
               B
               "S

                              CO

                              §
                              I
        §3   52
        If!
        I'll
I
                                  <3
                                 •
                                    e
                                    en
                                    &
                     I
                     "8
                                    +
t
                                         g
                                         
                                         +
                          'S
                          VO
                          cn
                          +
                          "8
                                          I
                                          vq
                                          d
                                   O C-     00 GO C-
                                                    5     qqg
                                                  I
                                                  13
                                                  •3
                                                  .a
                                                  (0
I
                                &
                                §
                                        •s

                                            o

                                           1
                                                          1
                                                           a.> oo
                                                             oo
                                           "-> §
                                           ja
                                           I
                                                                       I
                                                        w
                                                        o
                                                                       oo
                                                                       o
                                                             o
                                                             O
                                                                            iC
                                                N
                                                                            .a
                                                             en O
                                                             en ^
                                                                           . o
   August 1991
                        9B-10   DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
         t,
          p
         •£
I

"is
_53
         W
        g-J
I
w
O

$
 M EJ
o  s
fc  &
             W
             O
               '
             •2 c>
             +
              2 & T?  &
      I
                             8      8
                             1
                     ft 33  -H
o
*~s
      Om U ^) .
                                                         W PH W W
                                                         O O K O
                                                             t
                                                      8
                                                      *t-i
                                                      -a
                                                              I
                                                                 w
                                                                 o
                                                                    1  f
                                                                    «  oo
                                                                    £  en
                                                                  oo
                                                                  o
                                             P  OJ

                                            at
                                            en  o
                                            m  "*tf*
August 1991
                              9B-11     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
          1
          •?
          I
          -
          w
       *a
                           CM
w  w  s
CD  O  O
pj  pq  p?
PH  PH  K
                    c
                    IT)
                    o\
088
cn  <-(  cn
n4




S











I
                          I-
                          •o
                                8
      ffi
      O

      8
o
8
                                    e
                                    s
                                     CO

                                     •s
                                                                  &
t
                  CN
                               8,
                              -a
                          t   t
                                                                   v
                                                          \0
                       cn

                       C5
                                                                 \o
                                                                 CN
                                                                          o
                                                                          g
                                                            •8

                                                             1^
                                                             S OO
                                                             " O\

                                                            £~
                                                            •^"S

                                                             p*

                                                            ^ I
                                                            H-. J
                                                             o g
                                                             s ^
                                                             g j2


                                                            ff "ft
                                                            + 2
                                                            "^^ o

                                                            £ &>
                                                            =s >Q
                                                            Is oo
                                                            S CN
                                                           1
August 1991
                        9B-12    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   I
   S
    PH

   00
        s
        1
1
        1
        o
        w
i"l
               o
               S
               en
               en

It
                            8
                    o
                    en
                    VO


                    O
                            in
            8

            @
                                 +
                             £r
                                   -S
        in


         si   jf CJ
        5   5 o5


        *   M §
        t-   en o
      o
      00
                                       W
                                         oo
                                         U
                                        *   a
                                        P<
                    in
                    CN

                    C5
                               1

                               5S





                               I
                               P4


                               |




                               I
                               in

                                                 8
                               -
                               O



                               i
                                                   .  o

                                                   -S 0°
                                                   ^3 o\
                                                     -
                                              ?|  5

                                              a % -^
                                           en

                                           C5
                                    t-
                                    en
                                                             w
                                                     1/3

                                                     O
                                                             cs
                                                             oo
                                                             o\

8
                                                                  O

                                                                00
N
                                                                  •S
                                                                   ft
                                                            &
                                                            £


                                                            i
                                                            •8

                                                            1
                                                            •S
                                                            £
                                                            l-ll
                                                            •iall
                                                                   ci
                                                  g »  g S  m

                                                  -I §  J> §  0,"

                                                  ^ S'  ^ g  I

                                                  ^ o  ^ o  ^
in

o
August 1991
               9B-13    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
JT1
51
             £

             'e
            §
             a

            I
            W
       eo
                  P—« I—i l-^
                  888
                oo
888
                             8
8
8
                     8
w
o
8
                                                          w
                  CO
                                                              p(
                         §
                         •s
*SJ   CO   CO
&   E?   fr
fc  ^  ^
§  2  a
                                             1
                   ctf
                  T3

                        t
8
                                                                 I
                                                                 !
                                r
                                T-i
                                <—I
                                +
                                N^/


                                I

                                1-

                                                                     f
                                                                     'S
                                                                 v^  O

                                                                 I   ®
                                                                 "«3   S

                                                                 a.«.5
o et al.
ts.
                                                                     vo
                                1
                                 &,
                                 13

                               rt"?
                               >
                               J3^
                               ^ 00
                                 f.
                                -a
    I
8
                                    O\
                                    i-H

                                    I
                                    fe

                                    1
                                      1? ^
                                      S I
                                      - £
of p
Height (+6
                                    1
                                                                          00

                                                                          o
   August 1991
      9B-14    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  CO
CO
     1
•
o ,










J
1

,JN
s
.-S
f
0
.5
o
oo
oo
o\
rH
•s
I
.
day-old plants
o
en
_i^
en
T-H
^
. ,
$
"p,
o
CO
CO
1

CO

a
™

in
T— <

0


o-
a
o
E
2
T-l
1
CO
s
I— 1
0
VO
^ j
ass of leaves (
S
. n
c
-------
           |




           fi
          i
i
o
o
•S3
a

I
          W
H  £
3  o
Eo *£f
O  C8
o. *•*
n* £3

W Q
        il
    eo
                 o\
       88
              CM CM
              in >n
              o\ o*>
              P5 pq   o-
                 O
            nQ   HM  PM
            O   O  O

m w  a     www
cj o  o     rr i   TJ.<  rr t
     ^ a   * »   *  *•


     SI   si   i  "i.
     is   s^   *§  ^

 °    o ^  "s 8   o  r3
 60   t> -rt   -C «   CT>  sS'
     a-^fj »-H   >. .
_.      O   o s^.   ~-  "•
•g    c« i   ° '$•
 M ^^ Jw P-*  (-1 W
 53 ^- H. at   o >


^2|^   |1
                                                CM
                                 
-------
S
O-i
S
         I
         4-»
         I
         is

         1
         1
         w
       tl
        •a
               *
                     e
                      ffl
                      o
                                   ffi
                                   5
                                       I

                                       u
ffi
5
ffi
8
W
S
                        £ J  I«
                        -^ S  -^ rM
                        •« §  •=! 8
                        "* S  •* ^
                            r1
                            OO
                   I
                   S
                   a
                                                          §
                                                          'S
K
O

                                                         e

                                                         CO
                                                         «


                                                         I.
                                                             •a
                                                         1
                                                             1
                                                         |a
                                                         g.^
                                                         -2 §
                                                                      M
                                                                     "S
                                                                      f IS;
                                                                  S^J
                                                                  J 2. i
                                                                  s 2 _i
                                                                  S l-i
                                                                    °
                                                                  o ?
                                                                  ^•1
                                                                  en ••"*
                                                                     60
                                                                     (U  rH

                                                                     ?  5
August 1991
                                9B-17    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  •L
  o
  •i
  i
I
g
•a
«
'5
        I
        W
£
    t
    u
   I
   co
      STI
K
O
K
O
w
o
ffi
o
£

I
00
                                     a,
                                     i
      I
      vo
                       £
                       o
                                        5*
                                       •o

                                       So
                               oo

                               o

                               O
                                                 CM

                                                 S
                                                 M
                                            W
                                    t
                                      oo
                                      s
                                         §
                                           O
                                           d
                                                ffl
                                                O
                                                          \o
                                                     i
                                                       8
                                                             o
                                                             OO
                                                             o\
                                                              # II
                                                             O
                                                          rH   ^

                                                             1
                                                              g,
                                                             -a
                                                             en
                                                        !1
                                                        £** d
                                                        ob •#
                                                        Y ^
                                                                 °s
                                                                ot
                                                                en  S




                                                                If
                                                                 o  S
                                                                So ^ m
                                                        . g s
                                                        O\ ~r *Cl
                                                        A - ^
                                                        + O H
                                                        ^* °

                                                        12 3
                                                        S+-5
                                                                •8
at
                                                        11 &
                                                        JB P,
                                    Pi
August 1991
                          9B-18   DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
        i
        'i
        tS
tion
de
Effec
            E
                 0)
                 1
                 W
          j
          o
     K
     O
                                                                  ea
             t
             en
             oo
t
 ^ M  ^j

•11  I
 •* g  •*
 2^2
 T—I t"1*  *—I
                                     8
                                                 pq pq pq pq
                                                 tL, g.j g, fe.

                                                 O O O O
                                                                  ll^^fl


                                                                  PHlt
                                                                  'B, § TJ Ti'eLi'S
                                                                  IM  -C lO <*J KM
                                                      J3
                                                                               en
                                                                               en
August 1991
                   9B-19    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
        1
NO
        I

        I
        CO
        •g
        W
      3 £3
      3 O
      to *•&

      II

      «Q
   s  iK-
   'S
w
o
w
o
w
o
                                 o
                                           a
8
                                                           "*
                                                           o\
                                                           Pd
w
o
                                                                w
August 1991
                    9B-20   DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------



«-,
fc
g
H
y
g
Q
w ^
n ST
OS ^H
~Q
GROWTH
ESTIGATI
* £
o e
*>j
i|
&jj ^£i
cc e
s
^^ b3
pc] p.
to ^s
§ w
S*
Ooc
!^ fe
o§
^2
^ S
B ^
go
•< o

^A p
^$ K^
»\ ^^.
"ti ^^
fl ^^
O i^i
& "*3
P4
o\
H
fe-
s
PH
51


i
i
o
g


s
&
1
PH



^
3
&
1
|
ft
a
§
«§
a
1
1
^
-4-*
1
W








8 PI
§ -j2
pg Q


81
Ul
Xti d(
3
'§
I

CO
cs

<1



w
PH

r.
•a
fruit dropped
(Thompson et
'S «

w> ij
!|
^ i
art
d5
- ^
^3
* <-*
cs •-
«? 5T
v^O
_-!-> tN
tH '^s
°1
CQ p.
f 1
£•«
1 M-H
^^ o
.•a eg
*4— (
0 -
'H * ^^
^ S S1
1 +§;
P N_ X T— t
fc





1
O
c\

CO
1-H
C5

                                  ca
                                  oo
                          W
                          PH
          W
          PH
                   I
                   o
                   o\
t
o
OS
O
0\
CSI
I
                                               oo
                                               I
                          W
                          PH
                                                                     I
                                                          CS 00
                                  t
                                          o
                                          U
August 1991
  9B-21    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   CO
B"
            a
           •a
           <-




           1
      I

w



o S o
                  8
                  3
    O oo
    ,_ o\


   I *"
    a oo
    P 0\
    a T-I
    •«  «

   £S
   OO ca

   + S
   v_^ JS

   •" 'n

   fa


    •i
   IT* «
   ?. «B

   ^ a


   s52"
   § a
   *& a
   tw &.
   O r-,
cula
rt




1  §>

^  T3


   O\
                            W
                            O
                      w
                      o
                                    8
(-

9
                            -


                            0  T-
em.
                              1


                              I
CO OO
I3




i§
g
,£>
><
s
f§
.§
co O
w C5
1^

CO
fr
-o
VO
x-^
1
.in

^J
'C
«
                                           •

                  &r—<
                   f^j






             ^    I
M
O
1,
o
U
f
(-10 or 0); young plants of
1985a)
Mass of plants
(Mortensen,
1
t>
O
O
10


§3
C5

c—
8
«
o"
u
*
1
rt oo
r2
(-17*), length of shoots (-13
Saxe and Christensen, 1984,
U &
^0,0
C5 ^
rt ^ .g
1
^ 1
6> o
^ £
ID §
o y
«-< -S
s =s
ta
oo to
P
o
8s 1
T-! ffl
i
O
Is
cf
o
s

"rt OO
H o\
fl
'"N OO
'-1 ON
+ «-<
•»— ' «
1 S
c3 -a
U §
'o •$
!>"
53 "2
* s
x-^\ <0
+i S
3 <»
•»—- s^x
1 a
£&
0 8
s °-
S~
CO
£
-a
CO
en
T-l
S
T— 4


6
,-;



!
£
«
I
o?
5
-«1
8); young plants; CO2 at
I
'S
%
1

CO
t
S


is
o



1
CO
a
is exaltata
t
•s
^)
&
1
rt
S
»•
8
>0
oo
t
1
8
o^
T-H
ts
ON
U
* *1
!
P<
d°
g,
^
•4-i
%
*s,
•s
CO
1

1
t?


13
o

  August 1991
                         9B-22    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
on
         1
         1
         PH

         ••i
         • tH


         I
         W
        w
     CO
8

             in
             en
 g

 eN
W
O
                  S  T3
                            O
                            t/3

                            O
                             I
                             o
                             a

                             oN
                             o
                             60
                              CO .

                              "
                     ^  s  ^
                     en  o  CJ'

                              3
c\
•4-t
1

{3
O
"C
<
P< O
CO S
a*

t
T-H

^—4
15
o
T— t


O
in
oo
o



S
3
Q
S
oleirolii
&3
«
I
s
I

CO
03
H
CO
">-.
•s
CtJ
pq
6
o
in
oo
o\
T— I
1
i
|
cT
o
1
ft
rt"
|

•s
1




1
9


o
OO
O






^
I
tn
1
so
1
2
"3
60
§
a
M
o
CO
£
r-
8
!
•?
oo
in
in*
cN
+^
1
•8
^
+
•s^X
%
S
o
en
1
*!«
1

.a
CO

o\
!
\o



en
O



o-
8
f
en
*— <
+
N— '
%
S
«g ^
CO *S
1 oo
8 ON
s~^ •+£
sl
Sil
aJl
1 1 !
00 i J
t5 + "§
53 ^^ ,3
1111
S" *S 9
•a.|S

1

jo en
i|
^ vo








CSTR/GH ' ChLum
ind Gray)
), mass of plant (+6), number of inflorescences (+10). (Thompson - CSTR/GH ChLum
)80) " '/•.•.'.-
6), mass of plant (+30), number of inflorescences (+61*). (Thompson
)80)
TO 13- ,'W> l v-*>
ei ^ j- ^T j-
j| -s "^ t>
te ffi . 33
1
53
'I | |
TS, rS ' *

c '?•> *" iS "^ JS
U| || ||
| ^ m £ m £

« .60
US'-! en
^ g r-i en
* « 0 o
S S3
5 §S
0 Q
  August 1991
                           9B-23    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Sr

S
              fc
              a
I
J
              a
             •u
Sfi
w
g|
                 VO
                 1
    f

    1
    "H,
                   oo
      T3

      10 J2
       - *S
      *M ®
      --* ^
                       §
                      e
                      •
                           w
                           o
                           g

             •8
                           o
                          ID
              ?
                          3;
                          >n i-t
                                +
of p
                                  a
                         O

                                      VO
                                      tN
                           «     a     a
                          •a    a     s
                                     "8
                             O
                           -T 00
               S*  I13  'I15  S
                                1
                                •a
                     J2

                              1
                               CO
                               CO
                                                «
6). (Thomps
                                               1

                                    •8
                                                 ?
^ #
                              •g  °
                              S
                                           w
                                           o

                                           o
                                          "§

                                          f

                                          i
                                          •8
    a    * -^
         OO O
    X    tN oo
    <^    + S
                                                       ts

                                       CO
                                       CO
                                                           O
                                             "8

                                             1
                                                          •8
                                             1
         10 J2  ^ JS
          *-  ai   *i (n

         |^5^
         "^ VO  ^ VO
         •O <-H  IO >-l
                     c
                    I
                         w
                         o
                                                                    6"
                                                                    PH


                                                                    1

                                                                    §3

                                                        OO
                                                        05
                                                         1
                                                                   VO
                                                                   10
                                                               •g;  «
                                                                   o
                                                                   o
g
                                                                                   |
W
o
                                                                      §
                                                                      !
                                                                                   tN
                                                                                   +
                                                                     'S







/— N
-S3
1
oo
S
b
£
s
5
K
S
g
«
ttj
§,
T3
55
1
rt
* t— (
&
8
00
« !
S~ '
V— t
^L'
1.
ft
<4-<
O
I ;
1
s?S
+,s
^)^3
^^

n
*^
P
i
10 jg
^ 1?
10 r-l
T— ( .
»— I
O



Cf
f?
+
V—'
i
"ft
«-l
o
1
g
^r &
co^oo
f?

„
T^
p
«
T3
*ll
10 £H
CO
CO
C3



   August 1991
                            9B-24    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
        i
        i
        .s
        1
        w
   1
   u
           w
           o
           1
I
o
S3
           ",
           <4-l
           O
           I15

          -1
                   U  U
K
O
I
I
M
O
                   .9

                   •8
                     O
                   _r oo
a*
4
                a
                o
                           •a
                           •s
a
o
a
o
      o
      oo
      0\
                        1 I
                        •a
                        •8
      e  *
      E  u

              1 II

          oo
          o\
                           en
                           en
                 •8
               I ^
               3  T=!
a
o
                                 ft  V 5^
             a*
                                    W-l

                   oo
                   o\
                   s
                                         cN
                       a
                                            j§
                                   i
                                   i
               11
                                  CO g

                                  is
                                  en •»-*


                                  "** X
                                  rgj


                                  II
                                  1 ID
w
                                                     00

                                s!
                                ^ vo
a
o
                                       1
                                       £
                                       i
                           1

                                                            ««
a
o
                                          •a
                                          •s
                                          §
                                          CO

                                          I
                                          0

                                          CO
                                                     ••a
                                                     "8
                                                                 is o"

                                                                tN
                                                                en
August 1991
              9B-25    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
           s*

          •a
          w

        wQ
    V)
               g
              i
               d
               to
               O.

en


d
s
                    &
                    a
                    •

               O   4-1
                   p

                   oo
H
O
                         oo
      g
      _

      O


      CO
                K
                O
     g

     I
                         i
      -w
      1

                     o
                     oo
                     o\
             o
             oo
W
O
                                        OO
et al.
+18*). (Thomp
of sh
K   a
o   o
                         O
                         oo
                         0\
et a
of shoot (+18
                         o

                         W)
                                          VO
                                       10
                       oo
                       Oi
et al.
+9
of shoo
                                                %
                                                a
                                                R
                       1
                       00
                                                cS
                                                •o
                                            CS  M
                                            en  in
                                                en
                                                en
w   w
o   o
                                                     o\
mpson
+
of sh
                                       s
                                       oo
                                       a!


                                      I
                                                         g
                                                         ON
                                                         g
                             2   1=1   S
                             e   ^   l
                                                         o
                                               L
                                               0\
                                                             •
                                                             1
e
                                    fe  »
                                   I.-5
                                                         rf s
                                 CM  ^
                                 en  to
                             1-H *
                             O oo



                             1 +
                                                                          O
                                                                     ^t" "tt  
8-
                                                            £
                                                            I
                                                      &    is
                                                      §
                                                                               <4-l OO

                                                                                O o\


                                                                    ON
                                                 cS
                                                      2
                                                                                      *
August 1991
                      9B-26     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
H
U


1
&




g
        ^



        I
        PH
3
z
1

deviation
Eff
       0
       O
    00
            W
            pi,
WWW
P-i PM PH
                 8
                 Q
    W
    E
                                                  a
                                                  o
                                  O .t
                                           0\
                                    BH,
                                  00
                               PH
                               l-i


                               1



                               I
                               «
SI
                                                o
                                                CO
                                                +
                                                53
              i?
              £~
a
o
                                                         S
                                                         ON
                                                              -3
                                                              t3

                                                              g
                                                              CO

                                                              I
                                                              o
                        o


                       I
                       <4-4
                        O
             S' gj 0 S 8 en
             ,-( ^N VO »- *   "—I
                                           •Sill
                                       S |  § 3  I §

                                       2^82^2
a    M  a
o    o  o
                               o
                               Q
                                                                   o       ^~,
                                                                   00  ^s   O  /—N
                                                                   ON  O   oo  O
                                                                   rH  OO   ON  OO
                                                                    „  ON   ^^  ON

                                                                   13   r    •    r
                                                                   ^_>  _   si  _,
                                                                     O  _2 r>
                                              Q  *Q {?  ^  'Q &
                                              •S   —       "^
                                              U  m ""* en  in ^
                                                                  en
                                                                  <0
                                        ^
                                                                      O
                                                                               00
                                                                               ON
                                                                               en
                                                                               en
                                                                               -
                                                                               to

                                                                               •s
                                                   I
8
                                                                                      o
                                                   1
                                                   •a
                                                                                      £
                                                                                      2
                                             CN
                                             en
August 1991
        9B-27     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------




ci


|
£4
S 
53 ^
Cu ^-t
«o
. »T fcawtf
HB ~
K 5U
5S
§^
@l
^£| pMH
O R
IS
s PM
5?*"
r/\
^»* ta^
o 5
fcH ^SJ
fcf P£I
is
"*^< C5
C*"^ ^"i
*? * -fc
**-* /^
P3 S
8 5
,«.<






•u
s
g
s
^
a
•S*
1






3*
i
i
«§
I
-X3
5
w





fi fl
s o
Co **3
O |3
w Q
^0-
s il
rtS

I
CO






















1

5r^
2
O
h (Enceliafarinosa
%


t£3
•c
M

Si s
3 3 P
33 3
0 D o


O O O




'o
1
§ o1
5 oo
« ON ^— ^
°g o r ON
^» ID ^3 '—^
* ^ ^ *^
*^j o5 -H w
as-"
I l|
1 |6 I
*-* CO* '-' ^
• -r|- ~4~ **">.
S* is c?
S' ^« ^
*0 0^4-.
o o s • o
5 *S'§ .§
CO t4-t ^ W
t+-4 O CS tM
0 co ^ 0
*•* •* O\ w
s? si P
1 III
O O fa O
w c p. fL
Kb a Jr a
1 I1 1



»M* »M*
^ i
D .S
rf 1 1 rf S
3^1 3 f
ID *"* co ID r"
'-I CO
r-l CO
C3 O




i
3
3
U


a
o


cS
6
(M
O
J
o &
. 00
^s
S r
H
P
?l
^in
•*-» -4-
8^
S
° '8
13
+ &
Linear growth (
produced (+2




!l
'8






g
3
3
U


a
o






S"
oo
ON
•a
ts
rt
I
P

•s-
1
o
i
5
1
i



A?
3 vo
>D *^
O
T—t




a
3
2
D


O




o
K CD*
a °°
So ^
rescences (•
(Thompsor
o ^
S"i
rl
P
o "3
CQ §
S 00
« CN
 c^




CO






g
3
|g
0


8


ON"
oo
ON
T-<
A
•c3
•<-*
O
s
1
1
2
T— t
cn1
N^
g
S3
2
?^
-*->
i
/^ co
<-1
H 0
e i-l
§ «
'& (Euonymus japoni
30 days
(Fraxinus americant
•S co -S
^ 0 ^
!3 CD
•1 i
00 ^

g
3
3
0
a
o
g
00
U




^

CO
1
1
00
2
vo
^p
&
CO
1
•s
s
1— 1
1
^^
u OO
cq O\
li
^s
?1
^ W
^ ® 2*

Q

CO ?^
6 h/da, 28 day
(Fraxinus pennsylva
t— t *OT
0 rf
C3

O

g
P
3
o
a
o
00
O




CO
W)

CO
1
1
s
vo
oo
CO
CO
1
0
s •
1

li
5^
?!
N— ' CO
ft



CO
1 '
VO
T-H
o

























y- 	 •,

U
K
•^
t-i
S
'C
§
^
1
e
"S
o
CO

U

Q g
3 3
jd jd
0 G


§ §






00
ON
r-l
i
*.t
oo
ON /-^'
<— < . >D
~ t-H
*o$ ^-^
15 o
1 1
Qx *4-^
rt O
J i
Fj S
oo~ ID*
i i
O O
el) en
1 1



^
^ w ,
'O & ^
13
xn ^ co
rH
^ — I
o



August 1991
9B-28    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
e
         %•
              PH
3

i
deviation
               O


               W
             O Hi
         s  s
    ffi
    o
                   ON
     60

     =
     o
                       «y
                                     13


                                     O


                                     6
       J
       I
       ^
       o

       I
       n
       S3
                                 .1
                                     csi

                                     3
                                                   en
                                                   +
                                                      a
                                                      CO
                                                   o
                                                   en
                                                   en
                                                   O


H-3
<0
r^
S
 ON
*§ ^
3 ^G^
rj OO
~ § 2
ON -g
+ 4-i t3
I 8 I
_ep re 8
^ S


1
^H




IO
C3


of leaves (-3), leaf area (+7), mass of leaves (-2), mass of CE B952
:tings; harvested 3 weeks later. (Eastam and Ormrod, 1986)
$ %
fl T3
!!
* •-
^ ?
s*^ N^"
'!§> §
aj "S


I
•f— 1




O
T— (




1
t
i
1

s
1
f^.
"*— • •*

T-H
Q
PH
S
C>^
w
I
en^
»— <
*"
*
1
43
o
*\
*
*
*
o
en
N— '
i
3,
1


0
en




en
O


i— t
•a
§.
JS
1
"<3
1
•a












    August 1991
                                  9B-29    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
&

    I

       S


       I


       a

       eg

       ^o
       a
       1
       W
       O
       •S3
         M
                              10


                              PQ
                                  cs
            Jsl
            wco
         t
          'CN
                •  s  a a




                rH°°  ^H«S
i
i
                              C3   ^H
                                     U
                                        o\
                                        oo
                                        0\



                                      1

                                             w
                                             o
                                          1
                                          I
                                          oo
                                          o
                                              o\
                                             -s^  -

                                             ?!  i
                                             j»  i
                                          W

                                   53
                                           «

                                           O)
                                              W
                                                 co
                                                       a


                                                +^+ j

                                                Il

                            -
                   OGO
                     i
                     CO
                                                   4 J3 a



                             !
                             s

August 1991
                          9B-30    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
         1
II
a§
                 W
                 O
w
o
                 
-------
                                                      PQ
                                              VI
                                              1

                                              8
                                              o
                                              VI
                                              s
                                              v
                                              *-H
                                              O
                                              o
                                             #
                                                 s
                                             13   -9 -ii 'a "§ -S
                                             •a   fl & S ^ o
                                             1   § s I ^ a
                            ilgg
August 1991
9B-32   DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
      10.  THE EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON
 NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS AND THEIR COMPONENTS
10.1  INTRODUCTION
     The previous chapter discusses the responses of individual plants exposed to nitrogen
oxides (NO, NO^. This chapter explains the known effects of nitrogen compounds (e.g.,
nitrogen oxides, nitrate, nitric acid) on terrestrial and aquatic communities.  Because the
various ecosystem components are chemically interrelated, stresses placed on the individual
components, such as those caused by nitrogen loading, can produce perturbations that are not
readily reversed and will significantly alter an ecosystem.
     Since the mid-1980s the view has emerged that the atmospheric deposition of inorganic
nitrogen has impacted aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. It is known that in many areas of
the United States the atmospheric input of nitrogen compounds is  significant (U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1982), however, the impacts are generally unknown or
considered benign.  Although, the evidence linking nitrogen deposition with ecological
impacts is tenuous there has been a growing concern (Skeffmgt6n and Wilson, 1988).  This
concern has,been magnified because (1) the atmospheric concentrations  of nitrogen
compounds have increased in North America and most European countries, and
(2) ecosystems formerly limited by nitrogen have .become nitrogen saturated via atmospheric
deposition. These concerns have led to attempts to develop "critical loads" of nitrogen for
various ecosystems.  A "critical load" is defined as, "a  quantitative estimate of an exposure to
one or more pollutants below which significant harmful effects on specified sensitive elements
of the environment do not occur according to present knowledge" (Nilsson and Grennfelt,
1988).
     This chapter is organized into six main sections that are presented in the following
sequence:  (1) overview and description and responses of ecosystems to impairment of
functions; (2) a generalized description of the nitrogen cycle; (3) deposition of nitrogen into
ecosystems;  (4) terrestrial ecosystem effects, specifically the response ,of soil and vegetation
to nitrogen deposition; (5) effects on wetlands and bogs of nitrogen loading; and
(6) discussion of the effects on aquatic ecosystems of nitrogen loading.
       August 1991
                                        10-1
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      10.1.2 Ecosystems
 2           Ecosystems are composed of populations of "self-supporting" and "self maintaining"
 3      living plants, animals and microorganisms interacting among themselves and with the non-
 4      living chemical and physical environment within which they exist (Odum, 1989; Billings,
 5      1978; Smith, 1980).  Ecosystems usually have definable limits and may be large or small
 6      (©•§•> fallen logs, forests, grasslands, cultivated or uncultivated fields, ponds, lakes, rivers,
 7      estuaries, oceans, the earth) (Odum, 1971; Smith, 1980; Barbour et al., 1980).  The
 8      environmental conditions of a particular area or region determine the boundaries of the
 9      ecosystem as well as the organisms  that can live there (Smith, 1980).  Together, the
10      environment, the organisms and the physiological processes resulting from their interactions
11      form the life-support systems that are essential to the existence of any species on earth,
12      including man  (Odum, 1989).
13           Human welfare is dependent on ecological systems and processes.  Natural ecosystems
14      are traditionally spoken of in terms  of their structure and functions. Ecosystem structure
15      includes the species  (richness and abundance), their mass and arrangement in an ecosystem.
16      This is termed  an ecosystem's standing stock—nature's free "goods" (Westman, 1977).
17      Society reaps two kinds of benefits  from the structural aspects of ah ecosystem:  (1) products
18      with market value such as fish, minerals, forest products and Pharmaceuticals, and genetic
19      resources of valuable species (e.g.,  plants for crops and  timber, and animals for
20      domestication), and (2) the use and  appreciation of ecosystems for recreation, esthetic
21      enjoyment, and study (Westman, 1977).
22           More difficult to comprehend, but no less vital, are the functional aspects of an
23      ecosystem.  They are the dynamics  of ecosystems  and impart to society a variety of benefits,
24      nature's free "services."  Ecosystem functions encompass the interactions of its components
25      and their environment and maintain clean air, pure water, a green earth arid a balance of
26      creatures; the functions that enable humans to obtain the food, fiber, energy and other
27      material needs  for survival (Westman, 1977).                ••       •••:•
28
29      10.1.2.1 Characteristics of Ecosystems
30           Ecosystems have both  structure arid function. Structure within ecosystems involves
31      several levels of organization. The most visible are:  (1) the individual and its environment;
        August 1991
10-2
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     (2) the population and its environment; and (3) the biological community and its
 2     environment, the ecosystem (Billings, 1978).  The responses of the constituent organisms to
 3     environmental changes or perturbations determines the response of the ecosystem.
 4     Populations of plants, animals, and microorganisms (producers, consumers, and decomposers)
 5     "within, an ecosystem live together and interact as communities.  Communities, due to the
 6     interaction of their populations and of the individuals that constitute them, respond to
 7     pollutant stresses differently from individuals.  Organisms vary in their ability to withstand
 8     environmental changes.^ The range of variation within which individual organisms can exist
 9     and function determines the ability of a population of organisms to survive.
10          Intense competition among plants for light, water, nutrients, and space, along with
11     recurrent natural climatic (temperature) and biological (herbivory, disease) stresses can alter
12     the species composition of communities by eliminating those individuals sensitive to specific
13     stresses. Those organisms able to cope with the stresses survive  and reproduce. Competition
14     among plants of the same species does not influence species succession (community change
15     over time). Competition among different species, .however, results in succession and
16     ultimately produces ecosystems composed of plant species that have a capacity to tolerate the
17     competitional stresses (Kozlowlski, 1980).  Pollutant stresses are superimposed upon the
18     naturally occurring competitional stresses mentioned above.  Air  pollutants are known to alter
19     the diversity and structure.of plant communities (Guderian et-al.,  1985).  The primary effect
20     of air pollutants is on the more susceptible members of the  plant community in that they can
21     no longer compete effectively for essential nutrients, water, light, space etc. As a
22     consequence of altered competitive conditions in the community, there is a decline in the
23     sensitive species permitting  the enhanced growth of more tolerant species.  The extent of
24     change that may occur in a  community depends on the condition and type of community as
25     well as the pollutant exposure.                       s      '
26                                   .-....;..
27     10.1.2.2  Ecosystem Functions
28          Ecosystem function refers to the suite of processes and interactions among its
29     components and their environment that involve movement of nutrients and energy through a
30     community as organic matter.  The more nutrients available the more energy flows.
31     Hydrological, gaseous and sedimentary cycles are involved. -Water is the medium by which
        August 1991
10-3
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     nutrients make their never-ending odyssey through an ecosystem (Smith,  1980).  In gaseous
  2     cycles which include carbon, oxygen and nitrogen, the atmosphere is the primary reservoir
  3     and in sedimentary cycles, phosphorus, sulfur, calcium, magnesium, and potassium move
  4     from the land to the sea and back.
  5          Vegetation, through the process of photosynthesis plays a very important role in energy
  6     and nutrient transfer.  Plants accumulate, use and store carbon, the basic building blocks of
  7     large organic molecules, to maintain physiological processes and to  form their structure.
  8     During photosynthesis, plants utilize energy from sunlight to convert carbon dioxide (CO2)
  9     from the atmosphere and water from the soil into carbohydrates.  Carbohydrates serve as the
 10     raw material for further biochemical synthesis (Waring and Schlesinger, 1985).
 11          The energy accumulated and stored by vegetation also is available to other organisms
 12     such as herbivores, carnivores and decomposers.  Energy and nutrients move from  organism
 13     to organism in food chains or food webs that become more complex as ecosystem diversity
 14     increases (Odum, 1989).  Its flow through the biological food chains is unidirectional.
 15     Ultimately, it is dissipated into the atmosphere as heat and must be replaced (Barbour et al.,
 16     1980;  Billings, 1978; Odum, 1989).  Nutrients and water can be recycled, fed back into the
 17     system, and used over and over again (Barbour et al., 1980; Odum, 1989).  The plant
 18     processes of photosynthesis, nutrient uptake, respiration, translocation,  carbon allocation, and
 19     biosynthesis are directly related to the ecosystem functions of energy flow and nutrient
20     cycling.   Reduction  in diversity and structure in ecosystems shortens the food chains, reduces
21     the total nutrient inventory and returns the ecosystem to a simpler successional stage
22     (Woodwell,  1970).
23
24     10.1.2.3  Ecosystem Response:  Impairment of Functions, Changes in Structure
25         Ecosystems respond to stresses through their constituent organisms.  In plant
26     communities, individual species differ appreciably in their sensitivity to stresses; the changes
27     that occur within plant communities reflect such differences.  The response of plant
28     populations or species to environmental perturbation depends upon their genetic constitution
29     (genotype), life cycles,  and the .microhabitats in which the plants are growing.  Stresses such
30     as changes in the physical or chemical environment of plant populations apply new selection
31      pressures on individual  organisms (Treshow, 1980).   A common response in a community
       August 1991
10-4
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     under stress is the elimination of the more sensitive populations and an increase in abundance
 2     of species that tolerate or are favored by the stress (Woodwell,  1970; Guderian et al.,. 1985).
 3          Factors that influence the rate or amount of energy flow or of nutrient cycling alter the
 4     relationships that exist between organisms and their non-living environment.  Air pollutants,
 5     for example, that limit carbon fixation will shift allocation to new leaves, while factors that
 6     limit the availability of nitrogen  or water will shift allocation to the roots (Winner and
 7     Atkinson, 1986).  Such subtle and indirect effects of pollutant exposures, by inhibiting or
 8     altering plant physiological processes, decrease the ability of organisms to compete.
 9     Increasing pollutant stresses provide selective forces that favor some genotypes, suppress
10     others, and eliminate those species that lack sufficient genetic diversity to survive.  Removal
11     of these organisms from an ecosystem can impair ecosystem functions and set the stage for
12     changes in community structure  that possibly may have irreversible consequences (Guderian
13     and Kueppers,  1988).
14          Abundant evidence exists to show  that plant communities undergo structural changes
15     that reduce biological variation when resistant species become dominant (Miller,  1973, Smith,
16     1980; Treshow, 1980; Woodwell, 1970).  In forest communities the selective removal of the
17     larger overstory plants in favor of plants of small stature results in a shift from a complex
18     forest community to the less complex hardy shrub and herb communities (Woodwell, 1970;
19     Miller,  1973).  Thus, there is a  change  in the occurrence,  size, and distribution of plants, in
20     species interactions, and in community composition and the processes of energy flow and
21     nutrient cycling are altered.  Ultimately, the basic structure of the ecosystem is also changed.
22          Predicting the effects of nitrogen compounds from anthropogenic sources on natural
23     ecosystems involves uncertainties because:  (1) it is difficult to determine accurately the
24     atmospheric nitrogen deposition; (2) less is known concerning the response of nonagricultural
25     plant communities to increased supplies of fixed nitrogen than  for agricultural crops; and
26     finally, (3) the effects of nitrogen saturation have been studied for only a short time.
27          The next section outlines the nitrogen cycle and mentions changes in the cycle that may
28     result from the increasing additions of nitrogen. The subsequent sections discuss the observed
29     effects of increased nitrogen deposition  on terrestrial, wetland and  aquatic ecosystems and the
30     possible changes in the nitrogen cycle that may result.
31
        August 1991
10-5
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  J     10.1.3  The Nitrogen Cycle
  2          Nitrogen, one of the main constituents of the protein molecules essential to all life, is
  3     recycled within ecosystems. Most organisms  cannot use the molecular nitrogen found in the
  4     earth's atmosphere.  It must be transformed by terrestrial and aquatic microorganisms into a
  5     form usable by other organisms.  The transformations of nitrogen as it moves through an
  6     ecosystem is referred to as the "nitrogen cycle" (National Research Council, 1978). Mature
  7     natural ecosystems are essentially self-sufficient and independent of external additions.
  8     Modern technology by either adding or removing nitrogen from an ecosystems may be
  9     upsetting the relationships that exist among the various components and thus changing its
 10     structure and functioning.
 11          Nitrogen usually enters plants through the roots  by:  (1) absorption of ammonia and
 12     ammonium, (2) absorption of nitrate (and nitrite),  and (3) nitrogen fixation by symbiotic
 13     organisms.   Therefore, a pollutant that can be converted chemically or biologically into
 14     ammonia, nitrate, or nitrite can be used by plants.  Nitrogen oxides which fall upon soil have
 15     the potential for conversion and adsorption by microbial or chemical action and  can enter
 16     plants easily through the soil/root interface. Soil-deposited nitrogen, however, can overload
 17     the soil/plant system (see below).  Gaseous NOX which  enters through the leaves can also be
 18     converted for plant use since most leaves have enzyme systems  which can handle the
 19     compounds derived from NOX (see Chapter 9).
20          The term "nitrogen cycle" (Figure 10-1)  is used to refer to the transformations of
21      nitrogen as  it moves through the environment.  In general outline, the nitrogen cycle is
22     identical in  terrestrial, fresh water and oceanic habitats;  only the microorganisms which
23      mediate the various transformations are different (Alexander, 1977).  In terrestrial and aquatic
24      ecosystems, the major nonbiological processes of the nitrogen cycle involve phase
25      transformations rather than chemical reactions. These transformations include
26      (1) volatilization of gaseous nitrogen forms (e.g., ammonia); (2) sedimentation of particulate
27      forms of inorganic nitrogen; and (3) sorption (e.g., of ammonium ions by clays) (National
28      Research Council, 1978).  In general, the steps in the nitrogen cycle are as  follows:
29      (1) Nitrogen Fixation, (2) Assimilation, (3)  Ammonification, (4) Nitrification,
       August 1991
10-6
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                                                      00
                                                                      t>
                                                                      o\
August 1991
10-7
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     (5) Denitrification.  These biological transformations involved in the nitrogen cycle will be
  2     discussed below.
  3          Under natural conditions, nitrogen is added to ecosystems by fixation of atmospheric
  4     nitrogen, deposition in rain, from windblown aerosols containing both organic and inorganic
  5     nitrogen, and from the absorption of atmospheric ammonia by plants and soil (Smith, 1980).
  6     Nitrogen fixation, the conversion of molecular nitrogen into a biologically available form, is
  7     mediated almost entirely by microorganisms in both terrestrial and aquatic habitats
  8     (Alexander, 1977).
  9          Plants can utilize nitrogen in the form of ammonium or nitrate with equal efficiency and
10     either form can be converted by plants into amino acids, protein and nucleic acids.  The
11     organic nitrogen in plants is transferred to herbivores when they eat plants.  Herbivores may
12     in turn be eaten and the nitrogen utilized by their predators.  The urea and excreta of animals
13     and the organic remains of dead plants and animals are eventually decomposed by
14     microorganisms and transformed into ammonia. Ammonia gas may be (1) volatilized into the
15     atmosphere, (2) converted into nitrates by bacteria, (3) absorbed by plants, or (4) leached into
16     streams, lakes or eventually the ocean where it available for use in aquatic ecosystems.
17          Modern technology is perturbing the cycle by altering the amounts and fluxes of
18     nitrogen in  the various portions of the cycle.  For example, increased nitrogen oxide
19     emissions from transportation and stationary fossil fuel burning sources over the past 50 years
20     have increased the wet and dry deposition of nitrates and the amount of nitrogen moving
21     through terrestrial and aquatic nitrogen cycles. Crops can utilize only a proportion of the
22     nitrogen fertilizers (containing nitrates, ammonium salts, anhydrous or liquid ammonia, or
23     urea) added to the agricultural soils; leaching and runoff results (Sprent, 1987).  Also,
24     ammonia emissions  from livestock feedlots have increased the nitrogen moving through the
25     nitrogen cycle.  Harvesting of crops,  on the other hand, removes nitrogen from
26     agroecosystems and makes them dependent on the  addition of inorganic nitrogen fertilizers
27     (Bolin and Arrhenius, 1977).  Timber harvesting also removes nitrogen and disrupts the soil-
28     plant-microorganism relationships.  Forest clear-cutting increases the loss of nitrates in soil
29     water (Bowden and Bormann, 1986).  Burning of the residues left after timber removal may
30     lead to further nitrogen loss (Vitousek, 1981).
31
        August 1991
10-8
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
10.1.3.1 Biological Nitrogen Fixation
     Nitrogen fixation, the conversion of molecular nitrogen gas (N^ to ammonium
(NH4+), is accomplished by a limited number of free-living and symbiotic (living in the
roots of leguminous plants) bacteria.  The ammonia (NH3) formed is available to plants and
other microorganisms.  Nitrogen fixation is essential in the maintenance of soil fertility in
terrestrial, aquatic and agricultural ecosystems.
                      »
10.1.3.2 Assimilation
     Plants assimilate inorganic nitrogen from the soil and convert it into organic nitrogen.
All plants, except certain bog and wetland species,  are able to assimilate inorganic nitrogen as
either ammonium or nitrate and to convert them into organic molecules  such as amino acids,
proteins, and nucleic acids.  Bacteria are also important assimilators of inorganic nitrogen in
the soil while algae are the predominant assimilators of inorganic nitrogen in aquatic habitats.
Most plants utilize ammonium more readily than nitrate; however, if no other factors limit
microbial growth, microorganisms will scavenge the available ammonium making it
unavailable.  Under these circumstances, nitrate becomes the most important source of
nitrogen for plants (Rosswall, 1981).

10.1.3.3 Ammonification (Mineralization)
     Bacteria and fungi form ammonium during the decomposition of dead plants and
animals. Proteins in dead plants and animals, as well as the excretion products of animals,
are decomposed to amino acids.  The nitrogen in amino acids in turn are converted into
ammonium.  The ammonium may be (1) assimilated by terrestrial or aquatic plants and
microorganism, (2) bound by clay particles in the soil,  or (3) converted into nitrates  by
microorganisms during nitrification.  Ammonification is important in renewing the limited
supply of inorganic nitrogen utilizable by plants.
     During ammonification, gaseous ammonia (NH3)  may escape into  the atmosphere
during the process.  Its volatilization is a purely physical process whereby ammonia, in
equilibrium with ammonium (NH4+) in solution, is lost as a gas.  Gaseous losses are
significant if pH is below 7.5 (Reddy and Patrick,  1984).  Ammonia volatilization can be
mediated by biological activity to the extent that organisms can alter the pH of their
        August 1991
                                          10-9
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     environment.  Ammonia losses from wetlands are normally significant because submerged
  2     and wetland soils generally have pH values between 5.0 and 7.2 (Ponnanperuma, 1972).
  3
  4     10.1.3.4 Nitrification
  5          Nitrification is the two-step process during which microorganisms first convert
  6     ammonium (NH4+) to nitrite (NO2") and then to nitrate (NO3~). In the first step, several
  7     genera of bacteria including the genus, Nitrosomonas) reduce ammonium to nitrite. The
  8     second step is accomplished by several genera of bacteria including Nitrobacter that reduced
  9     nitrite to nitrate (Reddy and Patrick, 1984; Atlas and Bartha, 1981).  Nitrification is strictly
 10     an aerobic process and only oxygen can serve as the electron acceptor.  Nitrification can
 11     occur in manure piles, during sewage processing, in soil and in marine environments in the
 12     oxygenated water column above the anaerobic sediments or within the surface of oxidized
 13     layers of sediments. Recent studies suggest that nitrous oxide (N2O) is produced during
 14     nitrification.  Bowden (1986) points out, however, that in the field nitrous oxide production
 15     via nitrification is controlled by the oxidation status of the soil.
 16          Other than atmospheric transformations of NOX to nitrates, nitrification is the sole
 17     natural source of nitrate in the biosphere (National Research Council, 1978).   Nitrate is the
 18     predominant nitrogenous ion in precipitation (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1982).
 19     It is at this stage that the nitrogen cycle has been most influenced through agricultural
20     practices (Delwiche, 1977; Bolin and Arrhenius, 1977). Natural processes are unable to
21     produce sufficient nitrogen to grow the crops needed to feed humanity. This has led to the
22     development and increasing use of industrially made fertilizers. • In 1970, Delwiche (1970)
23     estimated that the amount of nitrogen fixed annually since  1950 for the production of
24     fertilizer equaled the amount that was fixed by all terrestrial ecosystems before the advent of
25     modern agriculture.
26          Nitrates, whether added to the soil (1) as fertilizers, (2) by nitrification,  or (3) from
27     atmospheric deposition, may:
28            •  be utilized by microorganisms,
29            •  be taken up by plants,
30            •  be lost through surface runoff into streams, rivers, lakes, wetlands or
31               oceans,
32            •  percolate into the ground water, or
33            •  escape as gas to the atmosphere (Buckman and Brady, 1969).
       August 1991
10-10
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     10.1.3.5 Denitrification
 2          Denitrification is an anaerobic bacterial process during which nitrates are converted into
 3     atmospheric nitrogen gas.  Nitrates (NO3~), are converted into nitrites (NO2~)> then gaseous
 4     nitrous oxide (N2O) and finally into nitrogen gas (N^, which escapes into the atmosphere.
 5     Under acidic conditions in the soil, nitrites rarely accumulate but are spontaneously
 6     decomposed into nitric oxide (NO).  Under alkaline conditions, they are biologically
 7     converted into nitrous oxide and molecular nitrogen (Alexander, 1977).
 8          Through denitrification, nitrogen becomes unavailable to most plants and
 9     microorganisms because it enters the large atmospheric reservoir where its residence time
10     may be as long as  107 years (Delwiche, 1977). Nitrous oxide has a much shorter residence
11     time. The  photochemical decomposition of nitrous oxides is the main stratospheric source of
12     nitrogen oxides (Delwiche, 1977). Nitrous oxide has been implicated in global warming
13     (BoUe.-et.al., 1986).        ;.
14          Nitrogen resides in five major reservoirs: (1) primary rocks, (2) sedimentary rocks,
15     (3) deep-sea sediment,  (4) the atmosphere, and (5) the soil-water pool.  The web of pathways
16     and fluxes by which oxides of nitrogen are produced, transformed, transported and stored in
17     the principal nitrogen reservoirs are commonly referred to as the nitrogen cycle are  outlined
18     above.  An understanding  of the nitrogen cycle is important in placing in  perspective human
19     intervention as discussed in other sections of this chapter.
20
21
22     10.2  DRY DEPOSITION RATES OF REACTIVE "N" FORMS
23          Deposition processes result in the removal of reactive nitrogen compounds from the
24     atmosphere, and their subsequent deposition onto landscape surfaces (e.g., foliage, bark,
25     soil). The fate of dry deposited compounds can be either  adsorption to surfaces or absorption
26     (i.e., uptake or incorporation) by surfaces.  By quantifying the link between atmospheric
27     processes and deposition of pollutants to plants, deposition measurements  provide valuable
28     input data for models of atmospheric chemistry, biogeochemical cycling,  and may help
29     explain how pollutants affect plants (Baldocchi et al., 1987,  1988; Hosker and Lindberg,
30     1982; Taylor etal., 1988).
        August 1991
10-11
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
     Dry deposition characteristics of nitrogen dioxide (NO^, nitric oxide (NO), nitric acid
vapor (HNO3), ammonia (NH3), and particle forms (NO3~ and NH4+) have been reported in
the literature and are discussed in the following sections.  Ammonia is not an oxide of
nitrogen, but when present at high concentrations in the atmosphere, it contributes to the total
amount of N deposited on landscape surfaces, and by dissolving in aerosols NH3 may
enhance HNO3 removal in wet precipitation (Erisman et al., 1988). Therefore,  ammonia
deposition data is included here. Deposition data is unavailable for other potentially
important reactive forms of N: nitrous acid (HNO2), dinitrogen pentoxide (N2O5), and the
gaseous nitrate radical (NO3).  Pernitrate species, such as peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN), will
not be discussed because they are described in another Air Quality Criteria Document (U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1986).  Nitrous oxide (N2O), the most abundant nitrogen
oxide,  will not be discussed because it is virtually inert in the troposphere and shows no
tendency for deposition (Singh, 1987).
     Garner et al. (1989) summarized available information on ambient air concentrations for
nitrogen oxides and made the following conclusions:

       1.  Nitrogen oxides are rarely if ever found in concentrations sufficient to
          cause visible injury to vegetation.
       2.  In high elevation forests typically away from urban  sources of pollution,
          concentrations of nitrogen oxides are usually below  or at the detection
          limits of available monitoring equipment (concentrations range from
          <0.003 to occasional peaks of 0.05 ppm).
       3.  In near-urban or rural forests, concentrations seldom exceed 0.010 ppm
          (overall range from <0.005 to 0.3 ppm).
       4.  In urban areas of eastern North America annual average nitrogen oxide
          concentrations are around 0.07 ppm with values ranging from < 0.005
          to 0.4 ppm.

A number of recent studies in remote areas have shown  that air concentrations of NO, NO2,
and HNO3 are commonly less than 0.005 ppm with HNO3 concentrations typically being
lower (Cadle et al.,  1982; Fahey et al., 1986; Kelly et al., 1984; Lefohn and Tingey, 1984).
In rural areas closer to sources of urban pollution, NO2  and HNO3 concentrations have been
measured in the 0.010-0.030 ppm and 0.001-0.003 ppm ranges, respectively (Bytnerowicz
       August 1991
                                        10-12
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     et al., 1987; Kelly et'al., 1989; Lefohn and Tingey, 1984). A detailed summary of current
 2     information on the air chemistry and concentrations of reactive nitrogen compounds can be
 3     found in Chapters 5 and 7 of this document.
 4           There are several general review articles for additional information ori the deposition of
 5     N forms to vegetation and other landscape surfaces.  Hosker and Lindberg (1982) discuss
 6     factors controlling pollutant deposition and capabilities for predicting interactions between
 7     atmospheric substances and vegetation.  McMahon and Denison (1979) provide a more
 8     extensive summary of particle deposition.  Sehmel (1980) summarizes particle and  gas dry
 9     deposition for a wide range of depositing materials.  Taylor-et'al. (1988) review pollutant
10     deposition to individual leaves and plant canopies with particular emphasis on physiological
11     sites of regulation.  World Health Organization (1987) also provides an extended discussion
12     of deposition of N forms important to the establishment of air quality guidelines.
13
14     10.2.1  Types  of Measurements
15           Dry deposition measurements have been conducted in the field at the forest canopy level
16     or in chambers using individual plant leaves (van Aalst and Diederen, 1985).  Canopy level
17     measurements are based on the assumption that deposition is a vertical  flux from the
18     atmosphere to a defined landscape area restricted by a series of pathway resistances.  Leaf-
19     level measurements in chambers, which ignore the atmospheric transport process by inducing
20     turbulent mixing  above the surface of leaves, also assume a series of resistances to pollutant
21     gas deposition. Leaf-level and canopy  measurements are normalized to leaf and ground
22     areas, respectively.  Although not yet applied to  pollutant gas deposition,  Matson and Harriss
23     (1988) have suggested the use of aircraft-based measurements to study  gas exchange over
24     wide landscape areas.
25           Canopy measurements typically employ either the eddy correlation or the flux gradient
26     micrometeorological techniques. Both  techniques require that measurements be conducted
27     under ideal conditions (e.g., flat, homogeneous,  and extensive landscape area), but some
28     progress in applying these techniques to more complex terrain has been made (McMillen,
29     1988; Hicks et al.,  1984).  The eddy correlation technique measures vertical, turbulent flux
30     directly from calculations of the mean covariance between wind velocity and pollutant
31     concentration (Wesely et al.,  1982).  The flux gradient or "profile" technique estimates
        August 1991
10-13
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  S
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 vertical flux from a concentration profile and eddy exchange coefficients (Erisman et al.,
 1988; Huebert et al., 1988).  One of the most difficult problems with dry  deposition
 estimates of N species, based on micrometeorological methods, stems from the inability to
 measure the appropriate atmospheric concentrations. Homogeneous gas phase reactions and
 gas/particle interactions of HNO3 and NH3 (Appel and ToMwa, 1981), and interferences of
 HNO3 with some NOX sensors (van Aalst and Diederen, 1985) are two examples of the      ;
 problems often encountered.  Many N species are so reactive in the canopy air space that
 their concentrations change significantly during the course of micrometeorological
 measurements, resulting in misleading flux data (Hicks et al.,  1989).  Businger (1986) and
 Baldocchi (1988) provide more extensive discussion of the benefits and/or  pitfalls of the
 canopy measurement techniques.
      Comparisons between throughfall or precipitation nitrate  and ammonium ion
 concentrations have also been used to calculate particulate N deposition to  forest canopies
 (Gravenhorst et al., 1983; Lovett and Lindberg, 1984).  However, the reactivity of trace N
 gases, their absorption by foliar surfaces (Norby et al., 1989; Garten and Hanson, 1990),  and
 the technique's inability to distinguish gaseous from particle forms (e.g., NO3" vs. HNO3)
 may lead to large errors.
      Three techniques have been used for leaf-level measurements.  The most common
 approach is based on mass-balance principles in which the leaf surface is enclosed in an
 environmentally controlled chamber and pollutant concentrations are compared at the inlet
 and outlet (Jarvis et al., 1971).  The mass-balance technique can be applied to individual
 leaves and branches (Rogers et al., 1977; Rowland-Bamford and Drew, 1988) or to enclosed
 crop canopies (Bennett and Hill,  1973; Hill, 1971). Less commonly, isotopic labeling of the
 exposure gas with 15N has been used to evaluate rates of deposition (Okano et al., 1988;
 Vose and Swank, 1990).  Leaf washing techniques compare extracts from leaves exposed to
pollutants and appropriate controls.  The difference in ion concentrations between treated and
control wash solutions is used to calculate rates of deposition (John et al., 1985;  Dasch,
 1987). Leaf-wash techniques may underestimate deposition because absorption or
translocation processes remove pollutants from the leaf surface (Taylor et al., 1988; Garten
and Hanson, 1990).  Further,  the leaf-wash method can not distinguish various sources of
nitrate deposited as HNO3, NO3, or particulate  NO3" (Dasch, 1987).
       August 1991
                                        10-14      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
 30
 31
10.2.2 Expressions of Deposition
     Rates of pollutant deposition determined from canopy or leaf level measurements can be
expressed  with similar equations.  The rate of deposition of pollutant gases to a canopy
surface has been defined as:
                                          * (Gz - C0>
                               (1)
where Fc is flux to the canopy in nmol nf2 s"1, Cz is the concentration at the height of the
                                                                                   o
measurement (nmol m"3), C0 is the concentration at receptor sites in the canopy (nmol m" ),
and Vd is the overall deposition velocity in units of m s-1.  The Vd is the reciprocal of the
total canopy resistance to flux.  An analogous equation can be derived for leaf-level, chamber
measurements:                   .                           '   -  -'  •>
                                             (Ca --
                               (2)
where Fl is flux to leaves, Ca is the concentration of pollutant in the air around the leaf, C{
is the concentration of pollutant in or on the leaf (often equal to 0), and Kt is the
conductance of the leaf to pollutant gas transfer.
     Both Vd and Kx represent concentration corrected deposition rates, and they are the     :
standard variables used to compare deposition, characteristics of pollutant gases and receptor
surfaces.  Although Vd and Kt have the same units, they are based on different receptor areas
and characterize processes at different scales of resolution.  Therefore, the following
conversion has been suggested as a first approximation for scaling between canopy and leaf
measurements of pollutant deposition so that data obtained with either technique can be
compared:                  .
                                  ...,yd =,K! *LAI       .-.  .•                        (3)

 where LAI is the leaf area index of the canopy appropriate to the Vd variable (Dasch, 1987;
 Dolske, 1988; Hanson etal., 1989; Hicks etal., 1987; Jarvis, 1971; O'Dell et al., 1977).
 For a given plant material and defined exposure, Vd should always be larger than Kx when
 canopy leaf area index is greater than one. This first-order conversion is admittedly crude
        August 1991
                                          10-15
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
 but useful.  Complex models are required to rigorously scale measured Kj data to application
 at the canopy level of resolution (Baldocchi, 1988; Baldocchi et al., 1987; Hicks et al., 1987;
 Kramm, 1989) because nonlinear processes are involved and driving variables change with
 depth in the canopy.

 10.2.3  Processes Governing Deposition of Gases and Particles
      Dry deposition of gases and particles to foliar and non-foliar surfaces refers to the
 transfer of N species between the free atmosphere and landscape surfaces.  Dry deposition
                                                                                     i
 processes need to be understood because they represent the first step in the transfer of
 pollutants to physiological sites of action in the leaf interior (Taylor et al., 1988) that are
 responsible for most deleterious effects on plants.  Detailed discussions of the factors
 influencing dry deposition of gases and particles have been published (Hosker and Lindberg,
 1982; Sehmel, 1980; Taylor et al.> 1988).  The reader is also directed to Section 10.2.4 for
 additional discussion of reactive nitrogen gas deposition to leaves and leaf interior spaces.
      Pollutant gas deposition to plant surfaces is controlled  by atmospheric turbulence,
 physical and/or chemical properties of gases, the presence of a chemical potential gradient
 between the atmosphere and receptor sites, and the nature and activity of plant surfaces
 (Table 10-1).  Hosker and Lindberg (1982) divided gaseous pollutant compounds into three
 groups based on the processes governing their deposition and assigned reactive nitrogen
 compounds  to each group as shown below.

       (1)  compounds able to adsorb readily to all surfaces [HNO3, NH3].
       (2)  compounds that interact with leaves primarily after diffusion through
           stomata into interior leaf air spaces [NO2 and to some extent NH3].
       (3)  compounds that exchange slowly with plants independent of the pathway
           for deposition [NO, N2O].
Recent data (Kisser-Priesack et al., 1987) suggest that NO2 and NO are also deposited onto
and through the cuticle; a feature appropriate to Hosker and Lindberg's Category #1
                                             i
compounds.
       August 1991
                                         10-16      DRAPT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                  TABLE 10-1. FACTORS INFLUENCING DRY DEPOSITION
                           OF REACTWE NITROGEN COMPOUNDS
                                   (Modified after Sehmel, 1980)
Chemical Properties of Depositing Material
Micrometeorological Variables
Aerodynamic resistance:
-mass transfer
-heat
-momentum
-I/deposition velocity


I
Diffusion effect of:
-canopy structure
-extent of fetch


Particles
Particle size:
-diameter
^density
-agglomeration




Diffusion:
-Brownian
-eddy
-eddy
Impaction
•• Qases
Partial Pressure
-solubility •
-concentration

Chemical activity/
reactions
, ' ,

Diffusion:
,•
-molecular



Receptor
Surface Variables
Abiotic features

Accommodation:
-dew
-exudates
-wax
-pubescence

Reactive sites:
-area
-prior loading
-adsorption
-absorption
       Friction velocity
       Surface roughness length
       Zero plane displacement
       Wind velocity
       Turbulence

       Temperature
       Relative humidity
       Precipitation

       Solar radiation
                              Gravitational settling

                              Electrostatic effects
                                                                     Biotic features

                                                                     Stomatal
                                                                       -conductance
                                                                       -diurnal pattern

                                                                     Plant metabolic rate
                                                                       -assimilation
                                                                       -cell pH
1

2

3

4

5
     The theory of particle deposition has been described and discussed in depth in several
recent papers (Davidson and Wu, 1990; McMahon and Denison, 1979; -Nicholson,  1988;
Sehmel, 1980).  These authors propose three characteristic features of dry particle deposition:
       August 1991
                                         10-17      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
32
33
34
35
        (1)  Particles greater than 10 jttm exhibit a variable deposition velocity (Vd)
            between 5 and 110 mm s"1 dependent on frictional velocities, while a
            minimum particle deposition velocity has been shown for particles in the
            size range 0.1-1 #m (Figure 10-2).
       (2) Deposition velocity of particles (Vd) is approximately a linear function of
           friction velocity.
       (3) Deposition of particles between the atmosphere and a forest canopy is
           from 2 to 16 times greater than deposition in adjacent open terrain (i.e,
           grasslands or other vegetation of low stature).
      Theoretically based models for predicting particle deposition velocities have recently
been published by Bache (1979a,  1979b), Davidson and Wu (1990), and Noll and Fang
(1989).  Dolske (1988) claims that dry deposition, whether in the form of gases or particles,
has from 3 to 20 times the potential of wet deposition to modify the chemical
microenvironment of foliar surfaces.  This claim was made based on the "cyclic reactivation"
of dry deposition by dew and rain which appears to, dissolve and  mobilize, but not necessarily
remove the pollutants from the foliar surface.
      Independent of the site of deposition of gases or particles (internal vs. cuticular) the
concentration of the pollutant in ambient air is representative of the driving force responsible
for direct and indirect effects on plant physiological processes. However, because the
chemical nature of all pollutants are not the same a single "time-averaged"  concentration
(e.g., 24 h vs. daylight means) might not be appropriate in all cases. For example, a 24 h
mean concentration is appropriate for the largely cuticular deposition observed for aerosol
particles and HNO3, but a daylight mean would be better for those pollutant gases whose
deposition is tightly controlled by stomatal aperture limitations to diffusion (e.g., NO, NO2).

10.2.4  Deposition of "N" Forms to  Foliar Surfaces
     Reported deposition velocities or conductances for NO2, NO, HNO3, NH3, and
particulate nitrogen forms are presented in Tables  10-2 through 10-10.  Each table is
organized by plant species or deposition surface and, unless noted otherwise,  the listed
deposition velocities correspond to daytime conditions.  Actual Vd values are highly variable
reaching maximum and minimum  values during midday and night periods, respectively.  Two
types of tables are used to present the  data for each of the four gases:  tables covering
       August 1991
                                         10-18
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                No resistance below and
                                atmospheric diffusion from
                                1 cm to 1 m
                      brownlan below and
                      pherio diffusion above
                       Indicated height
                                        10'1              1

                                           Particle Diameter, urn
Figure 10-2.  Predicted deposition velocities (Vd) at 1 meter for a friction velocity of
               30 cm s"1 and particle densities of 1,4, and 11.5 g cm"3 (Sehmel, 1980).
August 1991
10-19
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
       TABLE 10-2. CONDUCTANCE (K^ OF NO2 TO LEAF SURFACES
Species
Austrian pine (Pinus nigra)
Barley (Hordeum vitlgare)
Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)
g, = 0.26
g. = 0.05
Chinese hibiscus
(Hibiscus rosa-sinensis)
Cucumber (Cucmnis salivas')
Diffenbachia maculata
Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga
mensiesif)
[Mirb.] Franco
English ivy (Hedera helix)
European White Birch
(Belula pendula)
Ficus benjamina
Hedera canariensis
Honey locust
(Gleditsia triancanthos')
Indian rubber
(Ficus elastica)
Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda)
Concentration
ppmv (/ig/m"3)a
0.400
0.3
0.3
0.04
0.16
0.5
1
3
7
1.0
1.0
4.0
4.0
0.500
1.0
4.0
0.400
1.0
4.0
<0.06
0.400
0.400
1.0
4.0
1.0
4.0
0.400
1.0
4.0
0.020
rv *ibc
L-^-i J
rirm s"1
0.3d
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.1
1.0
0.8
0.85
0.63
0.69
0.79
0.54
0.65
1.1
0.49
0.31
0.2d
0.56
0.29
3.2
0.2
0.1
0.47
0.19
0.62
0.35
0.2
0.86
0.69
0.6
Method Reference
Chamber Elkiey et al. (1982)
Chamber Rowland-Bamford and Drew (1988)
15N Rowland-Bamford and Drew (1988)
Chamber Fuhrer and Erismann (1980)
Chamber Fuhrer and Erismann (1980)
15N Okano et al. (1988)
Chamber Srivastava et al. (1975)
Chamber Srivastava et al. (1975)
Chamber Srivastava et al. (1975)
Chamber Saxe (1986)
Chamber Saxe (1986)
Chamber Saxe (1986)
Chamber Saxe (1986)
15N Okano et al. (1988)
Chamber Saxe (1986)
Chamber Saxe (1986)
Chamber Elkiey et al. (1982)
Chamber Saxe (1986)
Chamber Saxe (1986)
NAe Freer-Smith (1983)
Chamber Elkiey et al. (1982)
Chamber Elkiey et al. (1982)
Chamber Saxe (1986)
Chamber Saxe (1986)
Chamber Saxe (1986)
Chamber Saxe (1986)
Chamber Elkiey et al. (1982)
Chamber Saxe (1986)
Chamber Saxe (1986)
Chamber Hanson et al. (1989)
August 1991
10-20
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   TABLE 10-2 (cont'd). CONDUCTANCE (K^ OF NO2 TO LEAF SURFACES
Species
Lombardy poplar
(Populus nigra)
Maize (Zea mays)



Mountain ash (Sorbus aria)
Nephrolepsis exaltala

Norway spruce (Picea abies)
Petunia (Petunia hybrida)
Prunus sargentii
Radish (Raphanus sativus)
Red maple (Acer rubrum)
Red spruce (Picea rubens)
Spruce (Picea sp.)
dormant
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)
current shoot
day
night
1-year shoot
day
night
2-year shoot
day
night
branches
branches
branches
dormant
dormant (field)
dormant (field)
dormant (field)
dormant (lab)
dormant (lab)
dormant (lab)
Concentration
ppmv Oig/m~3)a
<0.06

0.2
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.400
1.0
4.0
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.500
0.020
0.020
0.006-0.03



NA
NA

NA
NA

0.093 (175)
0.093 (175)
0.001
0.005-0.01
0.02-0.03
0.106 (200)
0.026 (50)
0.066 (125)
0.119 (225)
0.053 (100)
0.159 (300)
0.265 (500)
mm s"1
2.9

0.6
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.2
0.48
0.22
0.2d
0.6
0.1
1.9
1.8
0.4
«0.3



2.2-7.9
0.6-6.0

10
3.8

10.6
5.8
-l.l-2.1f
0.9-1.7
1.2-3.5
<1.0
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.2
Method
NA

15N
15N
15N
15N
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
15N
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber



Chamber
Chamber

Chamber
Chamber

Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Reference
Freer-Smith (1983)

Okano et al. (1986)
Okano et al. (1986)
Okano et al. (1986)
Okano et al. (1986)
Elkiey et al. (1982)
Saxe (1986)
Saxe (1986)
Elkiey et al. (1982)
Elkiey and Ormrod (1981)
Elkiey et al. (1982)
Okano et al. (1988)
Hanson et al. (1989)
Hanson et al. (1989)
Granat and Johansson (1983)



Grennfelt et al. (1983)
Grennfelt et al. (1983)

Grennfelt et al. (1983)
Grennfelt et al. (1983)

Grennfelt et al. (1983)
Grennfelt et al. (1983)
Johansson (1987)
Johansson (1987)
Johansson (1987)
Grennfelt et al. (1983)
Skarby et al. (1981)
Skarby et al. (1981)
Skarby et al. (1981)
Skarby et al. (1981)
Skarby et al. (1981)
Skarby et al. (1981)
August 1991
10-21    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
            TABLE 10-2 (cont'd).  CONDUCTANCE (Kj)' OF NO2 TO LEAF SURFACES
Concentration [Kj]130
Species ppmv (/ig/m"3)a mm s"1
Sunflower
(Helianthus annus)




Sweet pepper
(Capsicum annum)
Sycamore maple
(A. platanoides)
Sycamore
(Platantis occidentalis)
Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare)
Tobacco (Nicotiana
tabacum)
Tomato
(Lycopersicon esculentum)
light
dark
White ash
(Fraxinus americand)
White oak (Quercus alba)
White fir (Abies concolor)
White pine (Pinus strobus)
Yellow-Poplar
(Liriodendron tulipiferd)
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.5
1.0
2,0
1.5
NA
0.400

0.020

0.500
0.500


0.500
1.5
1.5
0.020

0.020
0,400
0.020
0.020

1.1
3.0
2.3
2.2
2.1
3.4
0.02-1.6
1.3
0.1

4.1

0.6
1.3


1.5
2.0-2.8
1.1-1.6
0.7

1.3
0.3d
0.4
1.5

Method
1 I5N
15N
15N
I5N
15N
15N
Chamber
NA
Chamber

Chamber

15N
15N


15N
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber

Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber

Reference
Okano et al. (1986)
Okano and Totsuka (1986)
Okano et al. (1986)
Okano et al. (1986)
Okano et al. (1986)
Okano and Totsuka (1986)
Rowland et al. (1985)
Law and Mansfield (1982)
Elkiey et al. (1982)

Hanson et al. (1989)

Okano et al. (1988)
Okano et al. (1988)


Okano et al. (1988)
Murray (1984)
Murray (1984)
Hanson et al. (1989)

Hanson et al. (1989)
Elkiey et al. (1982)
Hanson et al. (1989)
Hanson et al. (1989)

       Tor NO2 at 25 °C [1 /tg/m3 = 0.000531 ppmv].
       "Data are presented as a range or the mean of reported values.
       °Data for broadleaved plants and conifers are presented on a one-sided and total leaf area basis, respectively.
       dBased on a one-sided leaf area.
       *NA = not available.
       'Negative values represent evolution of NO2 from leaves.
1      leaf-level or canopy-level measurements.  If a cited paper lumped data for NO and NO2
2      together as NOX, that data is presented in Table 10-2 along with the information on NO2, but
3      it is indicated as being for NOX.  If the original authors did not calculate Kt or Vd,
      August 1991
10-22
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                     TABLE 10-3.  DEPOSITION VELOCITY (Vd) OF NO2
                               TO PLANT CANOPY SURFACES
Concentration •
Species ppmv (/ig/ni3)a
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)
day
night
Grass
lawn(NOx)
pasture (NOJ
Oats (Avena sativa)
day
night
Soybean (Gfycine max [L.J Merr.)
day
night
Spruce (Picea sp.) (NOJ

0.05
0.1
0.24
0.16

0.017 (32.4)
NAd

0.08
0.08
0.08
0.008-0.12
0.008-0.12
0.018
0.029
mm s"1

19
20
10.4
4.1

1.0-3.0
-26-15

12.5
12.5
4.2
3.6
0.7
28
20
Method

Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber

Flux grad.
Flux grad.

Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Eddy Corr.
Eddy Corr.
Gradient.
Gradient
Reference

Hill (1971)
Bennett and Hill (1973)
Tingey (1968)
Tingey (1968)





Delany and Davies (1983)
Duyzer et al. (1983)

Hill (1971)
Tingey (1968)
Tingey (1968)
Wesely et al. (1982)
Wesely et al. (1982)
Enders and Teichmann
Enders and Teichmann



(1986)
(1986)
      Tor NO2 at 25 °C [1 /*g/m3 = 0.000531 ppmv].
      bData are presented as a range or the mean of reported values.
      cData are based on ground area under the canopy.
      dNA = not available.
1     concentration and flux data from the original papers were used in Equations 1 or 2 to
2     generate the values reported in the following tables.
3
4     10.2.4.1 Nitrogen Dioxide
5          Direct measurements of NO2 deposition to crop species are widely reported (e.g.,
6     Bennett and Hill, 1973; Okano and Totsuka, 1986; Rogers et al., 1979b; Sinn et al., 1984;
7     Wesely et al., 1982), but fewer observations are available for woody plant species (Elkiey
8     et al.,  1982; Grennfelt et al., 1983; Rogers et al.,  1979) and fewer still for woody plants
9     using near-ambient concentrations of NO2 (Hanson et al., 1989; Johansson, 1987; Skarby
       August 1991
10-23      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
          TABLE 10-4. CONDUCTANCE (K^ OF NO TO LEAF SURFACES
Species
Chinese hibiscus
(Hibiscus rosa-sinensis)
Diffenbachia maculata
English ivy (Hedera helix)
Ficus benjamina
Hedera canariensis
Indian rubber
(Ficus elasticd)
Nephrolepsis exaltala
Pine/spruce dormant
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)
dormant (field)
dormant (lab)
Concentration
ppmv (/*g/m~3)a
4.0
4.0
4.0
1 4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
0.0005-0.002
variable
0.122 (150)
0.244 (300)
0.407 (500)
[KJta
tmn s"1
0.22
0.34
0.10
0.10
0.13
0.34
0.22
«0.3
«0.1
0.04
0.04
0.05
Method
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber1
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Reference
Saxe (1986)
Saxe (1986)
Saxe (1986)
Saxe (1986)
Saxe (1986)
Saxe (1986)
Saxe (1986)
Granat and Johansson (1983)
Johansson (1987)
Skarby et al. (1981)
Skarby et al. (1981)
Skarby et al. (1981)
'For NO at 25 °C 1 /tg/rnT3 = 0.000814 ppmv.
'Data are presented as a mean or range of reported values.
"Data for broadleaved plants and conifers are presented on a one-sided and total leaf area basis, respectively.
               TABLE 10-5. DEPOSITION VELOCITY (Vd) OF NO
                         TO PLANT CANOPY SURFACES
Species
Alfalfa
(Medicago sativa)
Concentration
ppmv (Atg/m"3)a
0.100
0.050
[Vd]bc
mm s"1
1.7
1.0
Method
Chamber
Chamber
Reference
Bennett and Hill (1973)
Hill (1971)
•For NO at 25 °C 1 /ig/m'3 = 0.000814 ppmv.
bData are the mean or a range of reported values.
TData are based on ground area under the canopy.
August 1991
10-24
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                                              TO LEAF SURFACES
                                                                               Reference

Species
American elm (Ulmus americand)
Austrian pine (Pinus nigra)
Pin oak (Quercus palustris)
Red maple (Acer rubrum)
Red spruce (Picea rubens)
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
White oak (Quercus alba)
White pine (Pinus strobus)
Concentration
ppmv (jug/m~3)a
1.2 - 0.012
0.012-1.2
0.012-1.2
0.02-0.03
0.058-0.067
0.02-0.07
0.04-0.07 ,
37-500 (95-1,288)
[Kj] :n
mm s"1
12
2.0
4.4
3.3°
2.6
1.1
2.2
0.4-0.8

Method
Chamber Das
Chamber Das
Chamber Das
Chamber Hai
Chamber Hai
Chamber Haj
Chamber Ha
Chamber M£
("1C
                                                                         Hanson et al. (1991)
                                                                         Hanson et al. (1991)
                                                                         Hanson et al. (1991)
                                                                         Hanson et al. (1991)
                                                                         Marshall and Cadle
                                                                         (1989)
      Tor HN03 at 25 °C 1 /*g/rn3 = 0.000388 ppmv.
      "Data for broadleaved plants and conifers are presented on a one-sided and total leaf area basis, respectively.
      The data from Hanson et al. (1991) represent cuticular deposition only.
1      et al., 1981). Tables 10-2 and 10-3 provide a comprehensive listing, by plant species, of
2      current data on the deposition of NO2 to leaf and canopy surfaces, respectively.  Data are
3      also available for potato plants (Sinn et al., 1984),  but conversion of that data to standard
4      units was not possible from the information supplied.
5           Nitrogen dioxide is deposited to plants over a range of concentrations from as little as
6      0.005 ppmv (Johansson,  1987) to those as great as 4 to 7 ppmv (Saxe, 1986; Srivastava
7      et al.,  1975).  The rate of deposition increases in proportion to rising ambient NO2
 8      concentrations (Sinn et al., 1984; Srivastava et al., 1975; Skarby et al., 1981).  At low
 9      concentrations of NO2 (0.0013 ppmv [2.4 gg nf3]), Johansson (1987) observed no deposition
10     in Scots pine.  Johansson suggested that his data indicated a "compensation point" at which
11     rates of NO2 deposition and evolution balance out. The compensation point was reported in
12     the 0.001 to 0.003 ppmv range.  If this compensation point is a general phenomenon it would
13     indicate little potential for NO2 deposition at concentrations common across many non-urban
14   , areas of the United States (i.e., areas of NO2 concentration <0.005 ppmv).  However, more
15     recent observations have shown that sunflower (Helianthus annuus) does not exhibit an NO2
16     compensation point  (Foerstel et al.,  1989).  Additional discussion of the deposition of  NO2
17     into leaves can be found in Section 9.4.1.
        August 1991
10-25      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
          TABLE 10-7.  DEPOSITION VELOCITY (Vd) OF HNO3 TO CANOPY SURFACES
Species
Barley (Hordeuni)
Beets (Beta)
Crop canopies
wind = 1ms'1
wind = 4 m s"1
Forest

wind = 1ms"1
wind = 4 m s"1
Grass (pasture)




wind = 1ms"1
wind = 4 m s"1

Pine (Pinus)
Potato (Solatium)
Spruce (Picea)
Wheat (Triticum)
lj=- 	 »— — — iuijii ijij.il. I-
Concentration
ppmv Og/m"3)"
NA
NAd
0.0001-OJ0005
NA'
NA
0.001-0.002
NA
NA,
NA:
NA
< 0.001 1 (2)
< 0.002 (2.6-4.3)
< 0.002 (3.2)
< 0.003
NA
NA:
NA
NA

0.001
NA
NA ,
NA
======
CKJ"
mm s"1
77
14
5-20
14
50
22-50
20-50
20-60
40
100
40
17-49
25
6
3-18
7-37
5
23

20-70
4
60-120
50-260
=====
Method
Flux grad.
Flux grad.
Model
NA
NA
Flux grad.
Model
Model
NA
NA
Flux grad.
Flux grad.
Flux grad.
Eddy flux.
Flux grad.
Flux grad.
NA
NA

Leaf Wash
Flux grad.
Model
Flux grad.
-
Reference
Harrison et al. (1989)
Harrison et al. (1989)
Meyers and Hicks (1988)
Fowler et al. (1989)
Fowler et al. (1989)
Meyers et al. (1989)
Hicks et al. (1985)
Hicks and Meyers (1988)
Fowler et al. (1989)
Fowler et al. (1989)
Erisman et al. (1988)
Huebert (1983)
Huebert and Robert (1985)
Huebert et al. (1988)
van Aalst & Diederen
(1985)
Harrison et al. (1989)
Fowler et al. (1989)
Fowler et al. (1989)
Dasch (1987)
Harrison et al. (1989)
Hicks et al. (1985)
Dollard et al. (1987)
       •For HN03 at 25 °C 1 ^g/m"3 = 0.000388 ppmv.
       bData are means or a range of the reported values.
       "Data are based on ground area under the canopy.
       dNA = not available.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
     Numerous studies have confirmed the control of stomatal aperture on NO2 deposition
using a variety of techniques (Hanson et al.,  1989; Rogers et al., 1977; Rogers et al.,
1979a,b; Saxe, 1986; Wesely et. ial., 1982; see also Section 9.4.1).  In addition, Murray
(1984), using a tomato mutant whose stomata did not close in the dark, claimed to have
found a direct relationship between light and NO2 deposition.
     Until recently it was assumed that cuticular deposition of NO2 was negligible.  Recent
studies by Lendzian and Kerstiens (1988) and Kisser-Priesack et al.  (1987) clearly
      August 1991
                                       10-26      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
       TABLE 10-8.  CONDUCTANCE (KT) OF NH3 TO LEAF SURFACES
.
Species
Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)
26.6 °C
33.4 °C

Cotton
(Gossypium hlrsutum)
Fescue
Heather/purple moor grass
(Calluna/Molina)
Italian rygrass
(Lolium multiflorum)
Maize (Zea mays)
Oats (Avena )
Orchard grass
Populus euramericana
Soybean (Glycine max)
Sunflower
(Helianthus annuus)
Tomato
(Lycopersicon esculentum)
Tobacco
(Nicotiana tabacum)
Wheat (Triticum)
Concentration
ppmv (jug/m"3)"

0.002
0.0035
0.005
0.005
0.008
0.14
0.071 (50)
0.144(100)
0.288 (200)
0.502 (350)
0.063 (44)
0.331
0.341
NAd
. 22.6 (16)
735 (520)
0.034 (24)
0.320
0.200
0.283
0.072
0.143
0.037 (26)
0.170
0.045 (31)

0.148

0.173

0.277
mm s"1

0
2
3-11
0
6-32
13
2-5
2-6
2.5-6
2-6
2
7
15
4
3
28
6.5
4
13
10
0.5-5
0.5-9
4
11
4

10

6

15
	 •— = —
Method

Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Estimated
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber

Chamber

Chamber

Chamber
.
Reference

Farquhar et al. (1980)
Farquhar et al. (1980)
Farquhar et al. (1980)
Farquhar et al. (1980)
Farquhar et al. (1980)
Rogers and Aneja (1980)
van Hove et al. (1987)
van Hove et al. (1987)
van Hove et al. (1987)
van Hove et al. (1987)
Hutchinson et al. (1972)
Rogers and Aneja (1980)
Rogers and Aneja (1980)
Duyzer et al. (1987)
Lockyer and Whitehead
(1986)
Lockyer and Whitehead
(1986)
Hutchinson et al. (1.972)
Rogers and Aneja (1980)
Rogers and Aneja (1980)
Rogers and Aneja (1980)
van Hove et al. (1989)
van Hove et al. (1989)
Hutchinson et al. (1972)
Rogers and Aneja (1980)
Hutchinson et al. (1972)

Rogers and Aneja (1980)

Rogers and Aneja (1980)

Rogers and Aneja (1980)
Tor NH3 at 25 °C 1 Mg/rn3 = 0.00143 ppmv.
bData are the mean or a range of reported values.
°K! is based on a one-sided leaf area.
dNA = not available.
August 1991
10-27
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                         TABLE 10-9.  DEPOSITION VELOCITY (Vd) OF NH3
                                   TO PLANT CANOPY SURFACES
            (Data showing net efflux of ammonia from fertilized crop landscapes are not included in this table.)
Species
Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)
Fescue
(Festtica arundinaced)
Heather/purple moor grass
(Calluna/Molina)
Maize (Zea mays)
Oats (Avena sativd)
Orchard grass
(Dactylis ghmerata)
Pine (Pimis sp.)
Soybean
(Glyclne max [L.] Merr.)
Concentration
ppmv (/ig/m-3)a
0.100
, 0.603
NAd
0.250
0.200
'0.576
NA
0.075
[VJ"0
mm s"1
4
12
19
3
10
10
18-26
6
Method
Chamber
Chamber
Flux grad.
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Flux grad.
Chamber
Reference
Aneja et al. (1986)
Aneja et al. (1986)
Duyzer et al. (1987)
Aneja et al. (1986)
Aneja et al. (1986)
Aneja et al. (1986)
Duyzer et al. (1987)
Aneja et al. (1986)
        'For NH3 at 25 °C 1 jig/m'3 = 0.00143 ppmv.
        bData are means or a range of reported values.
        "Data are based on ground area under the canopy.
        dNA = not available.
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
 demonstrate cuticular deposition rates (see the discussion in Section 9.4.1). However,
 cuticular deposition rates are 1 to 2 orders of magnitude less than representative stomatal
 uptake rates for tree foliage.  Because cuticle deposition is low it should be considered of
 minor importance, but not ignored when calculations of total N deposition to landscapes are
 attempted.
      Whole-canopy measurements of NO2 deposition conducted  in laboratory or field
 situations (Table 10-3) yield daytime overall deposition velocities (Vd) between 1 and
 28 mm s'1.  Duyzer et al. (1983) and van Aalst and Diederen (1985) cautioned that field
 measurements of NO2 deposition: may have been in error because NO2 analyzers are also
 sensitive to HNO3 vapor.  Nitric acid vapor has a higher deposition velocity than NO2
 (Section  10.2.4.3) and if monitored simultaneously with NO2 could have resulted in an
overestimate of deposition (e.g.,  tffill, 1971). Chemical reactions resulting from
photochemical reactions between NO, NO2, and 03 can also lead to errors in whole-canopy
       August 1991
                                        10-28      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                       TABLE 10-10.  MEASURED DEPOSITION
            VELOCITIES OF NITRATE (NO3') AND AMMONIUM (NH4+)
Deposition Velocity
Species
American elm
N03"
11
NH4+
NA
Method
Leaf wash
Reference
Dasch (1987)
(Ulmus americana)

Austrian pine
(Pinus nigra)

Beech (Fagus silvatica)
 winter

Ceanothus crassifolius
5-13


 13
7-17
6-16

4.T
0.1-0.6       Leaf wash     Dasch (1987)


  10         Throughfall    Hoefken and Gravenhorst (1982)
 6-13        Throughfall    Gravenhorst et al. (1983)
  2-8         Throughfall    Gravenhorst et al. (1983)

  4.4          Leaf wash     Bytnerowicz et al. (1987)
Chestnut oak (Quercus prinus)
  dormant

Heather/moor grass
(Calluna/Molina)

Laurel
(Kalmia latifolia)

Norway spruce
(Picea abies)
 5.5
 7.1

NAb


 NA
  NA        Throughfall    Lovett and Lindberg (1984)
  NA        Throughfall    Lovett and Lindberg (1984)

  1.8         Flux grad.     Duyzer et al. (1987)
0.3-1.4        Leaf wash     Tjepkema et al. (1981)
winter
Pasture land
Pin oak
(Quercus palustris)
Privet
(Ligustrum japonicwri)
(Ligustrum ovalifolium)
Soybean (Glycine max)
White pine
(Pinus strobus)
11-37
13-32
7-8
7-11


2.2-5.4
1-2.1
2.4
NA
7-21
6-16
NA
NA


NA
NA
NA
0.3-1.4
Throughfall
Throughfall
Gradient
Leaf wash


Leaf wash
Leaf wash
Leaf wash
Leaf wash
Gravenhorst et al. (1983)
Gravenhorst et al. (1983)
Huebertetal. (1988)
Dasch (1987)


John et al. (1985)
John etal. Q985)
Dolske (1988)
Tjepkema et al. (1981)
 "Particle NO3" deposition data typically includes some NO3" from HNO3 vapor.
 bNA = not available.
 August 1991
                  10-29
                 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
 Vd measurements based on micrometeorological techniques (Hicks et al., 1989).  Delany
 et al. (1986) reported that eddy correlation measurements conducted over a grassland were
 not appropriate for measurements of the fluxes of nitrogen oxides.  Their data showed that
 deposition of NOX predominated in the morning hours while emissions of NOX were observed
 in the afternoon.  However, their results which include both NO and NO2 were confounded
 by photochemical reactions with ozone, resulting in the bimodal pattern of diurnal deposition.
 Hicks and Matt (1988) also measured apparent bidirectional fluxes of NO2 from forest
 canopies, but they could not conclude that such fluxes were a consequence of natural NO2
 emissions (i.e., anthropogenic sources of NO2 and/or in-canopy transformations of NO2 to  •
 NO could have been responsible for the observed data).  Fitzjarrald and Lenschow (1983)
 conclude that the deposition velocity  (Vd) concept is invalid for circumstances when chemical
 reaction time is less than or comparable to the time required for turbulent diffusion.  It
 appears that this may often be the case for micormeteorologically  based measurements of
 canopy NO2 deposition.
      The leaf-level measurements of NO2 deposition presented in Table 10-2 encompass a
 large number and type of plant species. A simple average of the species specific data in
 Table 10-2 for  non-dormant plants indicates the following trend for deposition of NO2:
 broadleaf trees  = crop plants >  conifer trees = house plants.  Mean leaf conductance to
 NO2  (Kj) for broadleaf tree and crop plants was approximately  1.3 mm s"1, and for conifers
 and house plants between 0.5 and 1.0 mm s"1.  Hanson et al. (1989) documented a similar
 pattern.  ElMey et al. (1982) reported data on the foliar sorption of NO2 to ten ornamental
 woody plants using an NO2 concentration of 400 nl I"1. Based on one-sided leaf areas for
 conifers, they observed higher NO2 deposition to conifers than to hardwoods.  Had they used
 total area to normalize their conifer data it would have shown the opposite pattern. Okano
 et al.  (1988) reported a positive correlation between NO2 deposition and stomatal conductance
for eight different crops  which followed a trend associated with stomatal densities of the
foliage.  Grennfelt et al. (1983) also found a strong relationship  between NO2 deposition and
stomatal conductance for Scots pine.
       August 1991,
                                        10-30
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      10.2.4^2 Nitric Oxide
 2   •        A comparison of tree and crop data between Tables 10-2 and 10-4, or Tables 10-3 and
 3      10-5 shows that the Kx and Vd of NO are considerably less than for NO2. Lower
 4  -    conductance and deposition velocities indicate a reduced potential for the deposition of NO by
 5   !   leaves than for NO2.  The lower rate of deposition for NO is expected because of NO's
 6   -  lower aqueous solubility. Deposition data for several species of "house plants" reported by
 7     Saxe (1986) indicated the same trend.  The deposition of NO to foliar surfaces increased in a
 8     linear manner with respect to ambient concentrations (Skarby et al., 1981), and stomatal
 9     control over NO deposition has been documented by Saxe (1986). Kisser-Priesack et al.
10     (1987) also documented the capacity of Norway spruce and tomato cuticles to absorb gaseous
11     ' NO labeled with 15N, and concluded that a cuticular pathway for foliar deposition should not
12     be ignored.
13          , As for NO2, a compensation point for NO deposition to leaves has been indicated.
14     Nitric oxide concentrations greater than 0.05 ppmv routinely lead to deposition onto plant
15     canopies (Tables  10-4 and 10-5), but NO has also been observed to be evolved from foliage
16     (Farquhar et al.,  1983).  Klepper (1979) measured NO evolution from soybean plants stressed
17     with herbicides, and an enzyme  system responsible for the conversion of nitrite to nitrogen
18     oxides has been described by Dean and Harper (1988). Nitric oxide emissions from plants
19- ••.   'are not widespread;  and have only been documented completely for a specific set of plants in
20     the bean family (Leguminosae) (Dean and Harper,  1986).
21           Although more research is needed, two alfalfa studies suggest low deposition velocities
22      for NO to plant canopies (Table 10-5).  Given NO's potentially greater phytotoxicity (see
23  -    Section 9.4.3) deposition data from a broader array of plant species is needed.
24 •:..•-•
 25     10.2.4.3 Nitric Acid Vapor <
 26          The dry deposition characteristics of HNO3 vapor suggest substantially higher deposition
 27     for HNO3 than for other nitrogen oxides. Micrometeorological measurement of the overall
 28     deposition velocity of HNO3 to pasture grass  (see papers by various authors in Table 10-7),
 29     showed an average Vd for HNO3 of 29 mm s"1.  Other studies on crop canopies showed Vd
 30     values for HNO3 over a range from 4-260 mm s'1.  Using throughfall nitrate and ambient
 31     HNO3 concentrations, Dasch (1987) calculated the Vd for an Austrian pine (Pinus nigra)
         August 1991
10-31      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 stand to be 67 mm s"1 at the stand perimeter and 17 mm s"1 at interior stand locations.
 Dollard et al. (1987) reported Vd values as high as 260 mm s"1 for wheat canopies, but
 recent modeling efforts (Bennett,  1988; Meyers and Hicks, 1988; Meyers et al., 1989)
 indicate that such high Vd levels may not be possible.  Fowler et al. (1989a) assumed HNO,
                                                                                   •?
 and HC1 deposition to vegetation landscapes to be similar and concluded that Vd values for
 low stature vegetation and crops would range from 5 to 50 mm s"1 depending on wind speeds
 (Table 10-7). Forest landscapes also showed a range of Vd from 40 to 100 mm s"1 for low
 and high wind speeds, respectively.
      A computer model and ambient HNO3 concentrations were employed by Hicks et al.
 (1985) to predict the Vd of HNO3 to broadleaf and high elevation red spruce forests.  Their
 analysis  predicted a Vd between 20 and 50 mm s"1 for the low elevation broadleaf forests,
 and a Vd between 60-120 mm s"1  for red spruce forests at high elevations.  However, a more
 recent simulation for crop canopies (Meyers and Hicks,  1988) projected that HNO3
 deposition rates are mainly  limited by the atmosphere-canopy turbulent exchange mechanisms
 (wind), and predicted Vd values between 5 and 20 mm s"1 for slow and fast wind speeds,
 respectively. Fowler (1984) calculated that the atmospheric resistance to deposition of
 pollutants would increase from 2 to 4 fold depending on the nature of the landscape
 vegetation with a change in windspeed from 1 to 4 m s"1.  Flux gradient simulations based on
 weekly mean filter pack HNO3 concentration measurements for'a deciduous forest canopy
 (Meyers  et al., 1989) showed 35 mm s"1 to be an appropriate mean Vd with a range between
 20 and 60 mm s"1.
     Only a few studies have attempted to measure HNO3 deposition to individual leaves.
 Dasch (1989) used a mass balance approach to measure HNO3 deposition to tree foliage
 (Table 10-6) and found a mean ;KX for two hardwoods to be 8.2 mm s"1 and a Kt  for
 Pinus nigra to be 2 mm s"1. Marshall and Cadle (1989) also used a mass balance approach
 to measure HNO3 dry deposition to dormant pine shoots and found much lower Kx values
 ranging from 0.4 to 0.8 mm s'1.  Hanson et al. (1991) measured HNO3 conductances to
 foliage of four tree species under low humidity conditions and found a Kj ranging from
 1 to 3.3 mm s"1. Because low humidity caused stomatal closure, their measurements did not
include deposition to leaf internal spaces.  Vose and Swank (1990) used a 15N labeling
technique to assess HNO3 deposition to white pine foliage and found rates of
       August 1991
                                        10-32      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     "non-extractable" HNO3 absorption between 5 and 53 limol g"1 s"1.  These data were not
 2     included in Table 10-6 because the surface adsorbed HNO3 was removed in a water rinse
 3     prior to assaying nonextractable 15N-labeled HNO3.  Taylor et al. (1988) compared foliar
 4     deposition characteristics of HNO3 vapor to that of other pollutant gases and suggested that
 5     HNO3 deposition might be predominantly to the cuticle.  This contrasts with patterns for NO
 6     and NO2 which show most deposition to leaf interiors. Hanson and Taylor (1990) modeled
 7     dry deposition of four pollutant gases to a hypothetical leaf surface, and predicted that HNO3
 8     vapor deposition through plant cuticles would be greater than cuticular deposition of NO, O3,
 9     and SO2.  Vbse and Swank (1990) conducted a study of HNO3 deposition to foliar surfaces
10     using 15N labeled HNO3 has confirmed the cuticular pathway for HNO3 deposition.
11
12     10.2.4*4 Ammonia
13          Ammonia deposition data is limited primarily to crop plants.  The average deposition
14     variables for all crop species included in Tables 10-8 and 10-9 are a Kj for leaves of
15     5.6 mm s"1 and a Vd for canopies of 7.4 mm s"1.  Rates of NH3 deposition at concentrations
16     above 0.01 ppmv are linearly related to ambient concentration levels (van Hove et al., 1987;
17     Porter et al., 1972). However, Farquhar et al.  (1980) observed a temperature dependent
18     evolution of NH3 from bean plants resulting in no net exchange of NH3 at  ambient
19     concentrations between 0.003 and 0.005 ppmv.  For ambient concentrations below that
20      "compensation point" NH3 evolution was observed,  and  above that concentration NH3 was
21     deposited in proportion to ambient NH3 concentrations.  Lemon and van Houtte (1980) used
22      micrometerological techniques to reach similar conclusions (i.e., net NH3 deposition is
     * "
23      concentration dependent).
24           Limited data for forest species  show a similar range of Kx and Vd values.  Duyzer et al.
25      (1987) has reported Vd for ammonia to heather-purple moor grass (Calluna, Molinia sp.)
 26      canopies to be 19 mm s"1,  and Vd to Corsican pine  (Pinus nigra var. maritime) canopies
 27      ranged between 18 and 26  mm s"1.  These values are somewhat greater than those predicted
 28      for crop plants. Van Hove et al. (1989a) found that NH3 deposition to Phaseolus vulgaris
 29      and Populus euramericana cuticles decreased with decreasing relative humidity. Furthermore,
 30      the cuticle deposition sites  exhibited saturation given sufficient exposure time; little  of the
 31      adsorbed NH3 appeared to pass through the cuticle.  However,  cuticular deposition  of NH3
       . August 1991
10-33
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
 30
31
 represents only about 3% of the amount taken up via the stomata (van Hove et al., 1989a).
 Van Hove et al. (1989b) reported additional Kj data for internal and external surfaces of
 P. euramericana leaves ranging from 0.5 to 9 mm s"1 depending on stomatal conductance.
 Van Hove et al. (1990) concluded that calculation of NH3 deposition to leaves using only
 stomatal conductance data could result in a serious underestimation of the flux for conditions
 of low temperature and high relative humidity.
      Diurnal patterns of NH3 deposition follow similar patterns as for plant CO2 uptake
 (Hutchinson et al., 1972).  Other studies have related NH3 deposition to diurnal patterns of
 stomatal opening (Aneja et al.,; 1986; Rogers and Aneja, 1980).  A net deposition of 21 and
 86 #mol g fresh weight"1 h"1 at 30 and 300 ppmv, respectively, was measured in sunflower
 leaves using high concentrations of 15N labeled NH3 (Berger et 4.,, 1986).,:  15N labeled NH3
 was incorporated into corn seedlings (Porter et al., 1972).  Numerous other papers
 encompassing a range of plant species indicate that NH3 exchange between crop canopies and
 the atmosphere is a dynamic process, and concentration gradients between the atmosphere and
 the landscape determine whether net  influx or efflux of NH3 will take place (alfalfa—Dabney
 and Bouldin, 1985; grazed pasture—Denmead et al., 1974; maize—Farquhar et al.-, 1979;
 wheat—Harper et al., 1983, 1987;  Parton et al.,  1988).  All of these studies involved ,some
 type of fertilization regime,  and it remains unclear to what extent "nutrient poor" .natural
 ecosystems might exhibit NH3 efflux.
     Modeling simulations have come to similar conclusions..  A modeled "canopy-level" Vd
 for ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) was reported to be 3 to 14 mm s"1 (Cowling and Lockyer,
 1981). Sinclair and van Houtte (1982) simulated the deposition of NH3  to a soybean canopy
 and  determined that significant foliar deposition would occur at ambient  concentrations as low
          o
 as 1 #g m  . However, net deposition of NH3 by the combined soil-vegetation landscape was
predicted to occur routinely only at NH3 concentrations in the range from 40-70 fig m"3.
     Denmead et al. (1976) found  that ungrazed pasture was capable of  absorbing most NH3
released from the ground while :grazed pasture lost NH3 to the atmosphere.  Their
observations, while not quantitative, suggest that foliage of an ungrazed grass-clover pasture
is an effective sink for soil generated NH3.  Denmead et al. (1978) demonstrated that a corn
field (Zea mays) exhibited net absorption of NH3  only when soil surfaces were dry.
        August 1991
                                         10-34
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     10.2.4.5 Particles (Nitrate and Ammonium)
 2          Direct measurements of aerosol-associated N deposition to foliar and inert surfaces have
 3     been based on surface extractions, and extrapolations of throughfall information.
 4     Unfortunately, these types of observations are of limited value due to the inability to separate
 5     aerosol NO3" and NH4+ deposition from deposition due to HNO3, NO2, and NH3 that
 6     display the same ionic forms once deposited to landscape 'surfaces (Bytnerowicsz et al., 1987;
 7     Dasch, 1987; Lindberg and Lovett, 1985; van Aalst and Diederen, 1985). The average Vd
 8     for nitrate and ammonium (Table 10-10) was greater if determined from throughfall  '
 9     measurements (12 and 10 mm s"1) than if determined from individual leaf washing
10     experiments (6 and 2 mm s"1).  However, these differences in Vd between measurement
11     techniques are primarily a function of scale.  The leaf wash  measurements extract adsorbed
12     ions from a defined leaf area, but throughfall measurements  extract ions from all layers of the
13     canopy (an undefined area) and relate it only to the ground area of the stand (see also
14     discussion in Section 10.2).  Lindberg and Lovett (1985) estimated dry deposition of nitrate
15     to deciduous forest leaves to be 5.7 /xg ni"2 h"1, but declined to calculate a deposition velocity
16     because of difficulties in (1) obtaining accurate particulate NO3~ air concentrations (Appel and
17     Tokiwa, 1981) and (2) the contribution of HNO3 dry deposition to NO3" on the foliage
18     surface could not be separated from that of aerosol NO3". Dolske (1988) reported Vd values
19     for NO3" deposition to soybean to range from 30.8 down to 0.4 with a mean of 2.4  mm s" .
20     However, because Dolske's leaf wash measurements included  a component of HNO3 vapor
21    "'• the Vd values may represent more than deposition due to' aerosol nitrate alone.  •
22           Only one published paper has used micrometeorological  methods to determine the
23     aerosol nitrate and ammonium deposition to landscape surfaces.  The Vd information from
24     Duyzer et al. (1987) for aerosol NH4+ deposition to heathlands (1.8 mm s"1, Table 10-10)
25     was determined  using flux gradient analysis' of NH4+ particles trapped in filtered air leaving
26     denuder tubes.
27                                                        •         '
28      10.2.5  Deposition of "N" Forms to Non-Foliar Surfaces
29           In addition to foliage, deposition of particles and gases has also been  measured to bark,
30      soil, and snow covered surfaces (Table 10-11).   Measured  NO2 deposition of NO2  to normal
31      or wetted bark of three broadleaf and one conifer tree species was similar among species
        August 1991
10-35
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                    SURFACES TO REACTIVE NITROGEN GASES
Species
Nitrogen dioxide
Forest floor
Hardwood
Conifer
Bark
dry
wet
Forest litter
Hardwood
Conifer
Soil
Waltham, MA
sandy loam
adobe clay
Oak Ridge,TN
forest
Snow
Nitric Oxide
Soil
sandy loam
adobe clay
forest soil
Snow
Nitric Acid Vapor
Bark
Snow
-18 °C
-8
-5
-4
-3
-2
Concentration
ppmv Gitg/m"3)


0.044
0.043

0.066
0.058

0.076
0.074

3-100
13-53
13-53
0.050
NA
0.006-0.03


11-4
1-4
NA
0.0005-0.002

0.06-0.07

0.014 (36)a
0.014 (36)
0.014 (36)
0.014 (36)
0.014 (36)
0.014 (36)
[Ki]ab
mm s


4.7
4.8

0.47
0.93

0.06
-0.05

0.2
6
7.7
' 4.2
3.0
«0.3


1.9
1.3
<0.01
«0.3

7.4

<0.2
0.4
0.4
1.2
1.0
5.7
Method


Chamber
Chamber

Chamber
Chamber

Chamber
Chamber

Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
NA
Chamber


Chamber
Chamber
NA
Chamber

Chamber

Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Chamber
Reference


Hanson et al. (1989)
Hanson et al. (1989)

Hanson et al. (1989)
Hanson et al. (1989)

Hanson et al. (1989)
Hanson et al. (1989)

Abeles et al. (1971)
Judeikis and Wren (1978)
Judeikis and Wren (1978)
Hanson et al. (1989)
van. Aalst (1982)
Granat and Johansson (1983)


Judeikis and Wren (1978)
Judeikis and Wren (1978)
van Aalst (1982)
Granat and Johansson (1983)

Hanson et al. (1991)

Johansson and Granat (1986)
Johansson and Granat (1986)
Johansson and Granat (1986)
Johansson and Granat (1986)
Johansson and Granat (1986)
Johansson and Granat (1986)
'Data are presented as a range or the mean of reported values.
bData are based on total area for bark and litter, and ground area for snow, forest floor, and soil.
August 1991
10-36
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     (Hanson et al., 1989).  The conductance of NO2 to wet bark was almost double that to dry
 2     bark (Table 10-11). The conductances (Kt) ranged from 0.44 to 0.84 mm s"1 and were
 3     within a factor of 2 of Kj values for plant leaf surfaces. HNO3 conductance to bark was
 4     nearly an order of magnitude greater than for NO2 (Hanson et al., 1991; Table 10-11).  No
 5     data are available for the deposition of other forms of dry deposited nitrogen to bark.
 6          The deposition velocity of NO2 to soil exceeds that for NO (Table  10-11;'JudeiMs and
 7     Wren, 1978).  When compared to foliage or bark surfaces, deposition to the forest floor and
 8     soil surfaces show a disproportionately high rate (compare data from Tables 10-2 and 10-11).
 9     A comparison of deposition to  the soil and  forest showed that soil was the primary receptor
10     site of NO2 (Hanson et al., 1989).  Abeles et al. (1971) measured NO2 deposition to fresh
11     and autoclaved soil and determined that a biological sink was responsible for approximately
12     12% of the soil NO2 deposition. However, Ghiorse and Alexander (1976) found no
13     difference in soil deposition after autoclaving or T-irradiation and concluded that
14     microorganisms were responsible, not so much  for absorption of NO2, but its conversion into
15     nitrate. Mortland  (1965) and Sundaresan et al.  (1967) documented mechanisms for NO
16     deposition by soil based on adsorption or interaction with soil minerals.  Prather et al. (1973)
17     and Prather and Miyamoto (1974) provided data on the deposition of NO2 and NO to
18     calcareous  soils, but these data are not included in Table 10-11 because of the extremely high
19     air concentrations used (0.1 to  1.5% by volume).
20          Nitric acid vapor is the only oxide of nitrogen to exhibit significant deposition to snow,
21     but it does so only when temperatures  exceed -5 °C (Table 10-11; Granat and Johansson,
22     1983;  Johansson and Granat, 1986). Bennett (1988) modeled the deposition of reactive
23     gases, such as HNO3, to urban environments (i.e., city scapes) and calculated that Vd would
24     be limited to 2-5 mm  s"1 by  aerodynamic resistances.
25
26
27     10.3  EFFECTS ON VEGETATION AND SOILS
28     10.3.1  Introduction
29 .         The effects of any nutrient upon biological systems must be viewed from the perspective
30     of the amount of that  nutrient in the system, the biological demand for that nutrient, and the
31     amount of input.  Thus, if a nutrient is deposited on an ecosystem deficient in that nutrient, a
        August 1991
10-37
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 growth increase will occur, and this will be generally (but not always) be regarded as a
 positive effect (the deficiency condition in Figure 10-3).  If a nutrient is deposited on an
 ecosystem with adequate supplies of that nutrient, there may be no effect for a period of time
 or over a range of input values (the sufficiency condition in Figure 10-3).  Inputs of any
 nutrient greatly in excess of an ecosystem's biological demand will result in negative growth
 responses, or toxic effects of some sort, as shown in the last segment of the curve in
 Figure 10-3.
     Nitrogen (N) is unique among nutrients in that its retention and loss is regulated almost
 exclusively by biological processes. Whereas other major nutrients (P, S, K,  Ca, Mg, Mn)
 originate primarily from soil minerals and often accumulate in adsorbed/exchangeable pools
 in the soil, nitrogen originates from the atmosphere and rarely accumulates for long in
 exchangeable/adsorbed pools.  (Ammonium may accumulate by fixation in the interlayers of
 2:1 clays  or by chemical reactions with humus, but these pools are largely unavailable to
 either plants or microbes.)   In theory, large soil pools of NH4+ could occur, because NH4+
 strongly adsorbs to cation exchange sites (negatively-charged sites on clays and organic matter
 in soils).  Large soil NH4+ pools seldom occur, however, because of the action of nitrifiers
 (soil organisms that convert NH4+ to  NO3", a process referred to as nitrification), and, in
 alkaline soils, purely chemical conversion to NH3 gas followed by volatilization.  In those
 rare soils  where nitrification is inhibited and acidity is too great for volatilization, soil NH4+
pools can build up to fairly  high levels (e.g., Roelofs et al., 1987; Vitousek et al.,  1979), but
 these cases seem to be the exception rather than the rule.   Since NO3" is poorly adsorbed  to
 oils (in contrast to SO42" and ortho-phosphate; Kingston et al., 1967), nitrification in excess
 of plant and microbial demand for N almost always leads to increased NO3" leaching (e.g.,
van Breemen et al., 1982; Van Miegroet and Cole,  1984; Johnson and Todd,  1988; Foster
and Nicolson, 1988).  High rates of NO3" leaching can be deleterious for two major reasons:
 (1) the potential acidification of soils and waters and/or mobilization of A13+ (as is the case
                               i
with SO42"; Reuss and Johnson,  1986) and  (2) the potential contamination of drinking water
 (the EPA  standard for NO3" -N being  10 mg N/L).
     Soils are by far the largest N pool in forest ecosystems, usually exceeding 85% of total *
ecosystem capital (Cole  and Rapp, 1981). Yet most soil N is inert and unavailable for either ;
uptake or  leaching, with only a rather loosely-defined "mineralizeable" pool being
        August 1991
                                         10-38
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
            o
            DC
            Q.
                         DEFICIENCY
    SUFFICIENCY
                  TOXIC
                 NUTRIENT SUPPLY
       Figure 10-3. Schematic representation of the response of natural ecosystems to nutrient
                    inputs.
 1     biologically active (Aber et al.,  1989).  This "mineralizeable pool", the size of which is
 2  -., typically defined either by in situ incubation of soils or litter, is that portion of soil N that
 3     heterotrophs (decomposers), autrotrophs (plants), and nitrifying bacteria compete for.  The
 4     processes involved in this competition have been described and modeled, often with a special
 5     emphasis on nitrification and nitrate leaching (e.g., Vitousek et al., 1979; Riha et al., 1986).
 6 ,    However ^ a generally applicable and potentially predictive model analogous to, for example,
 7     cation exchange and leaching (e.g., Reuss, 1983; Gherini et al., 1985; Cosby et al.,  1985)
 8     remains elusive.  For example, the cessation of nitrate leaching following harvesting  in
 9     N-rich red alder (Alnus rubrd) forests in Washington (apparently a result of cessation of
10     N-fixation; Biggar and Cole, 1983; Van Miegroet et al., 1989) does not support earlier
11     predictions that nitrate leaching  following disturbance is usually greatest in sites with
12     inherently better N status (e.g.,  Vitousek et al., 1979). Also, the recent discovery of several
13     sites where nitrate leaching is high under undisturbed conditions (Van Miegroet and Cole,
14     1984; Foster, 1985; Joslin et al., 1987; Johnson et al., in press) does not support the long-
15     held notionfthat nitrogen is tightly cycled and conserved in forest ecosystems (e.g., Gessel
16     et al.,  1973; Cole and Rapp, 1981; Aber et al., 1989).
       August 1991
10-39
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
      The following discussion will focus upon forest ecosystems, because of their sensitivity
 to both the positive and negative effects of N deposition discussed above. Arid and semi-arid
 ecosystems are not as susceptible to the soil acidification and groundwater NO3~ pollution as
 are forest and agricultural systems in more humid areas because of a lack of water for NO3"
 leaching and because soils are more alkaline.  There are some important implications  of
 N deposition on arid and semi-arid ecosystems, however, that deserve consideration; namely,
 vegetation growth increases and increased denitrification. Therefore, due consideration of
 nitrogen cycling in and nitrogen deposition effects on arid ecosystems is given where
 information is available.
      Agricultural lands are excluded from this discussion because crops are routinely
 fertilized with amounts of N (100-300 kg/ha) that far exceed pollutant inputs even in the most
 heavily polluted areas. These high rates of fertilization can lead  to groundwater
 contamination problems and may contribute to the atmospheric N2O loading as well (e.g.,
 Hutchinson and Mosier, 1979), but a discussion of the  environmental effects of fertilization
 are beyond the scope of this Section.

 10.3.2  Pollutant N Inputs and Nitrogen Cycling  in  Natural Ecosystems:
         A Brief Review
      An evaluation of the effects of pollutant N deposition on terrestrial vegetation and soils
 must begin with considerations of how these pollutant inputs affect terrestrial N cycles.  The
 general subject of terrestrial N cycling was reviewed in section 10.1.3;  only a few of the
 more germane details are repeated here. Not all potential effects of pollutant N inputs can be
 described from the perspective of a generic N  cycle, however:  there are secondary effects
 such as effects of excessive vegetation uptake upon susceptibility  to attack by pests and
pathogens and to climatic damage, for example, that cannot be described from the N cycle
alone.
     Nitrogen, unlike Ca, K, Mg, P, or S, seldom forms large soil inorganic pools which
can buffer excessive inputs and provide a readily-available source of nutrient for plants.   In
theory, large soil pools of NH4+ could occur, because  NH4+ strongly adsorbs to cation
exchange sites. Large soil NH4+ pools seldom occur,  however,  because of the action of
nitrifiers, and, in alkaline soils, purely chemical conversion to NH3  gas followed by
       August 1991
                                         10-40
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     volatilization. In those rare soils where nitrification is inhibited and pH is too low for
 2     volatilization, soil NH4+ pools could, in theory, build up to fairly high levels (e.g., Roelofs
 3     et al., 1987; Vitousek et al., 1979), but these cases seem to be the exception rather than the
 4     rule.  The potential for the accumulation of large NH4+ pools can also be reduced by purely
 5     chemical reactions between ammonium and soil humus (e.g.,  Foster et al., 1985). Since
 6     NO3" is poorly adsorbed to soils, nitrification in excess of plant and microbial demand for N
 7     almost always leads to increased NO3" leaching (e.g., van Breemen et al., 1982; van
 8     Miegroet and Cole, 1984; Johnson and Todd, 1988; Foster and Nicolson,  1988).
 9           Nitrogen can enter forest ecosystems in many forms:  (1) wet deposition of NH4+,
10     NO3", and organic N; (2) dry deposition of these forms plus nitric acid vapor (Lindberg
11     et al., 1986), and (3) biological fixation of N2.  Inputs via  wet and dry deposition first
12     encounter the forest canopy where they may be taken up either by trees or by organisms
13     living within the canopy, or the phyllosphere (leaf surface). Deposited N not taken up  within
14     the phyllosphere falls primarily as wet deposition to the forest floor, where plants,
15     decomposers (heterotrophs, which consist of fungi  and bacteria), and nitrifiying bacteria
16     compete for it (Figure 10-4, top). This competition for N among heterotrophs, plants,  and
17     nitrifiying bacteria plays a major role in determining the degree to which a vegetation growth
18     increase will occur and the degree to which incoming N is retained within the ecosystem. It
19     has been assumed that nitrifiers are poor competitors for N compared to heterotrophs and
20     plants (Vitousek et al., 1982; Riha et al., 1986; see also review by Davidson et al.,  1991).
21     This assumption has recently been challenged by Davidson  et al. (1991).  Using 15N
22     techniques, these authors found significant nitrification and microbial NO3" uptake (12 to
23     46%  of N mineralization rates) in grassland soils even when soil NO3" pools and NO3"
24     leaching rates were very low. They concluded that the small soil NO3" pool in this site
25     turned over very rapidly due to nitrification and microbial uptake NO3" and that nitrifiers
26     were quite able competitors for N.  They also point out that NO3" production during
27     incubation actually represents a net effect of nitrification and  microbial NO3" uptake,  and
28     define this as "net nitrification".  The extent to which these results might apply to forest
29     ecosystems is unknown; however, if this pattern proves to be true in general, it will require a
30     substantial redesign of the conceptual model currently used to explain and predict nitrification
31     and NO3" leaching.
        August 1991
10-41
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                             LOW N DEPOSITION
                                                          VOLATILIZATION
                                  [toy Plant*)
                            yl^j— I   ";
                            I MlfUFCATIOM* ------
                                 itrih«>)      -r    \
                                         ^^JT ^^.
                                         "^    IMMCMILIZ*
                                               IMMOBILIZATION
                                               (by H»t»«oaofih[
                                               uptoh* «nd chvfni
                                               NH4 fxction with
                            FERTILIZATION
                              HIGH N DEPOSITION
Figure 10-4. Schematic representation of the fate of incoming N in N-poor (top),
             fertilized (center), and high-N input systems.
August 1991
10-42      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1          Heterotroph demand for N (both NH4+ and NO3") depends upon the supply of labile
 2     organic C substrates (as well as temperature and moisture conditions).  Thus, adding labile
 3     organic C to a soil should reduce plant uptake and net nitrification by increasing heterotrophic
 4     competition for NH4+ and increasing microbial NO3" uptake.  Adding labile organic C to a
 5     soil may also cause increased activity of denitrifying organisms,  which also require organic
 6     substrates, resulting in reduced nitrate leaching. Turner (1977) demonstrated that addition of
 7     carbohydrates to a forest soil in Washington caused increased N  deficiency in Douglas fir
 8     (Pseudotsuga menziesit) trees, presumably by stimulating heterotrophic competition for N.
 9     Johnson and Edwards (1979) found that addition of carbohydrate substrate to a forest soil
10     caused an immediate reduction in nitrate leaching and net nitrification production during
11     laboratory incubation of a yellow-poplar forest soil in Tennessee.
12          According to the conceptual model described above, nitrification and NO3" leaching will
13     become significant only after heterotroph and plant demand for N are substantially satisfied, a
14     condition that has been referred to as "nitrogen-saturated". There are various definitions for
15     "nitrogen-saturation", many of which are reviewed by Skeffington and Wilson (1988).  One
16     definition is "ecosystems where the primary production  will not  be further increased by an
17     increased in the supply of N".  There are clearly problems with  this definition in that
18     ecosystems that are low in N but limited by another nutrient (such as  P) may not experience
19     an increase in primary production in response to N input unless  P is added first (e.g.,
20     Pritchett and Comerford,  1982).  Other definitions for nitrogen saturation reviewed by
21     Skeffington and Wilson (1988) include:  "when external N input and N mineralization from
22     the soil exceed the capacity of the ecosystem organisms to absorb more N",  or "an ecosystem
23     which cannot accumulate more N".  Aber et al. (1989)  define nitrogen saturation "as the
24     availability of ammonium and nitrate in excess of total combined plant and microbial
25     nutritional demand" (p. 379).  This definition conveys the same  idea as those reviewed by
26     Skeffington and Wilson (1988), but, in its strictest sense,  it also is flawed.   All ecosystems,
27     even extremely N-deficient ones, have some small pool of ammonium and nitrate within the
28     soil and litter components.  Using the definition of Aber et al. (1989) in its  strictest sense,
29     then, all ecosystems are nitrogen saturated to one degree or another.   Aber et al. (1989) also
30     state that nitrogen saturation implies limitation on biotic function by some other resource
31     (e.g., phosphorus or water for plants or carbon for microbes).  But if this is so,  naturally
        August 1991
10-43
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      phosphorus (P)-deficient ecosystems (such as those in the southeastern coastal plain) might be
 2      considered nitrogen saturated, whereas in reality these ecosystems are often very low in N
 3      and release virtually no nitrate.  Furthermore, as noted above, P-deficient ecosystems will
 4      frequently accumulate substantially more N once P limitations are satisfied.
 5           While the precise definition of nitrogen saturation seems elusive because of various
 6      caveats that must be taken into account, the general idea seems to be encompassed in the last
 7      and most brief definition reviewed by Skeffington and Wilson (1988):  "an ecosystem which
 8      cannot accumulate more N".  This definition implies that further N accumulation cannot
 9      occur, even though other nutrient  limitations  are satisfied.  This definition will be used in the
10      following discussion.
11           It is important to note is that additional N inputs to an N-saturated ecosystem  will cause
12      equivalent leaching losses of NO3" regardless of the chemical form of the N entering the
13      system (NH4+, NO3", or organic) to the extent that (1) N inputs are in biologically available
14      forms, (2) nitrification proceeds uninhibited,  and (3) denitrification does not occur (Reuss and
15      Johnson,  1986).  There has been an unfortunate tendency among atmospheric deposition
16      researchers to ignore the effects of NH4+ and (especially) organic N on ecosystem
17      acidification and nitrate leaching, an omission which substantially underestimates the
18      acidification potential of atmospheric N deposition.
19           The rather simple model depicted in Figure 10-4 does not account for the possibility of
20      nitrification inhibitors.  Autotrophic nitrifiers are known to be inhibited by low pH high soil
21      solution Cl" concentrations, and certain organic chemicals,  both naturally- and synthetically-
22      produced (Alexander, 1963; Roseberg et al.,  1986).  The occurrence and importance of
23      naturally-produced nitrification inhibitors has received considerable attention in the  ecological
24      literature.  An early study by Rice and Pancholy (1972) indicated that nitrification rates
25      decrease during forest succession due to the presence of chemical nitrification inhibitors
26      (soluble alleopathic compounds produced by plant litter). This somewhat controversial
27      finding stimulated several follow-up investigations in various  ecosystems.  Some of these
28      investigations supported the contention that nitrification inhibitors were a factor in controlling
29      NO3" losses from  forest ecosystems (Lodhi,  1978; Olson and Reiners, 1983),  but several
30      others found no evidence of them, and concluded that either competition for NH4+ or other
        August 1991
10-44
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     nutrient limitations controlled nitrification rates (Purchase, 1974; Robertson and Vitousek,
 2     1981; Lamb, 1980; Cooper,  1986).
 3          There is no reason to doubt that inhibitors play a role in some forests, but the extent to
 4     which inhibitors occur and the factors leading to their production are unknown. Nor is it
 5     known how inhibitors might  function under conditions of very high, chronic NH4+ inputs.
 6     Roelofs et al. (1987) report little nitrification in Dutch forests subject to very high inputs of
 7     NH4+ from nearby agricultural activities, but they attribute the lack of nitrification in these
 8     forests to low pH.  The situation reported by Roelofs et al. (1987) is unusual, however; there
 9     are few cases where these conditions do not lead to high rates of nitrification and NO3"
10     leaching.   Others have reported high rates of nitrification under very acid soil conditions
11     (Klein etal., 1983; van Breemen et al., 1982, 1987).
12          Denitrification, (i.e., the microbially-mediated conversion of NO3"  to NOX and N2
13     gases) is thought to be of importance only in forest soils which (1) have  elevated  NO3"
14     inputs, and (2) experience anaerobic conditions (e.g., flooded conditions) (Davidson and
15     Swank, 1987).  Goodroad and Keeney (1984) provide estimates of denitrification losses from
16     relatively N-rich forest ecosystems in Wisconsin of 0.2 to 2.1 kg ha"1 yr"1, values that are
17     worthy of including in N budgets but do not compare to NO3" leaching rates  that have been
18     shown to occur in some forests (see below).  Similarly, Woodmansee (1978)  discounts the
19     importance of denitrification in grassland soils, showing  that  NH3 volatilization from animal
20     wastes is  the major N loss mechanism.  Curiously,  however, Westerman and Tucker (1978)
21     and Klubek et al.  (1978) found that denitrification rather than NH3 volatilization is the major
22     N loss mechanism from desert soils in the Sonoran and Great Basin desert ecosystems.  They
23     speculate that microsites with saturated water conditions  occur during precipitation events that
24     produce the anaerobic  conditions necessary for denitrification to occur.  Peterjohn and
25     Schlesinger (1990) calculated that 77% of atmospheric N inputs  to desert ecosystems in the
26     southwestern U.S. have been lost to the atmosphere since the last glaciation.  They stop short
27     of giving values for NOX and N2 (denitrification) vs.  NH3 (volatilization) losses,  but point
28     out that the importance of learning more about the nature of  gaseous N losses from these
29     systems,  especially in the case of N2O given its importance to the  ozone layer and as a
30     greenhouse gas.
        August 1991
10-45
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1           Vegetation demand for N depends upon a number of growth-influencing factors
  2      including temperature, moisture, and the availability of other nutrients. Limitation of
  3      moisture in arid ecosystems clearly does not" preclude growth responses to N input, however.
  4      Several studies have shown that demonstrated net N inputs to desert ecosystems produced
  5      growth increases despite supposed  water limitation? (Fisher et al., 1988c; see review by
  6      Moorhead et al., 1986).  Nitrogen is considered such an important factor in the productivity
  7      and function of desert ecosystems that an entire volume has been devoted to the subject (West
  8      andSkujins, 1978).
  9           In Forest ecosystems, stand age is an important factor determining N uptake rates.
10      Uptake rates decline as forests mature, especially after the cessation of the buildup of
11      nutrient-rich foliar biomass following crown closure (Switzer and Nelson, 1972; Miller,
12      1981; Turner,  1981).  Thus, one would expect NO3~ leaching rates to be greater in older
13      forests than in younger forests due to greater NH4+ supplies to nitrifiers as well as to lower
14      NO3" uptake in older forests.  The results of Vitousek and Reiners  (1975) support this
15      hypothesis in that they found higher NO3" concentrations in streams draining mature spruce-
16      fir forests than in streams draining immature spruce-fir forests  in New England.
17           Processes that cause net N export from ecosystems such as fire and harvesting will
18      naturally push ecosystems toward a state of greater N demand or even N deficiency.
19      Frequent fire is normally thought of as an especially effective way of maintaining  low
20      ecosystem N status. However, studies on the effects of fire upon soil N have produced
21      conflicting results.  Some authors have reported total N contents that were not significantly
22      changed within 1-2 years of burning whereas others have reported significant losses.
23      Jurgensen et al.  (1981) found that broadcast burning caused a minor net loss  of
24      N (approximately 100 kg/ha) from a clearcut site in Montana, and concluded that plant
25      re-establishment benefitted from  the increased N availability following this prescribed burn.
26      Wells (1971) noted that while the periodic prescribed burns has caused significant  losses of
27      forest floor material immediately after the burn, there seemed to be a tendency for the system
28      to regain this organic matter over time and approach the control condition. He also found
29      that organic matter and nitrogen were redistributed from the forest floor to the surface
30      mineral soil as a result of burning, the net effect being a redistribution of the organic matter
31      in the profile rather than a reduction.  Furthermore, one treatment (annually-burned plots)
        August 1991
10-46
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
\
 1      showed significant increases in soil N (550-990 kg/ha), which were attributed to increased
 2      activity of nitrogen-fixers.  In contrast, Grier (1975) noted significant nitrogen losses
 3      (855 kg/ha) from an intense fire on the eastern slope of the Cascade Mountains of
 4      Washington.  It seems that the net effect of fire on ecosystem N status has a great deal to do
 5      with fire intensity.
 6
 7      10.3.3  Fate of Nitrogen in Forest Ecosystems:  Contrasts Between Fertilizer
 8              and Pollutants
 9          The prospects for forests becoming "nitrogen saturated" from atmospheric N inputs have
10      been explored in recent workshops and reviews (Nilsson and  Grennfelt, 1988; Schulze et al.,
11      1989;  Aber et al., 1989).  Critical loads analyses for N saturation typically consider
12      vegetation uptake and increment as the primary factors controlling forest ecosystem N
13      retention, and attribute little potential for soil N accumulation, despite the fact that soils
14      comprise the  largest ecosystem N pool in virtually all forest ecosystems (Nilsson and
15      Grennfelt, 1988; Schulze et al.,  1989).  In contrast, numerous forest fertilization studies have
16      shown that litter and soils are major  sinks for N (e.g., Heilman and Gessel, 1963; Mead and
17      Pritchett, 1975; Miller et al., 1976; Melin et al., 1983; Raison et al., 1990). As noted by
18      Aber et al. (1989), it is not surprising that forest ecosystems  respond differently to pulse
19      inputs of N via fertilization vs.  slow, steady inputs via atmospheric deposition.
20           Fertilization studies differ from pollutant N deposition in two important respects.
21      Pollutant N deposition enters the ecosystem at the canopy level whereas fertilizer is typically
22      (but not always) applied to the soil.  Another important difference (as noted by Aber et al.,
23      1989) is that  pollutant N deposition enters the ecosystem as a slow, steady input in rather low
24      concentrations,  whereas the fertilizer is typically applied in 1-5 large doses.  Nitrate
25      applications or urea applications to N-rich sites can  result in substantial nitrate leaching losses
26      of fertilizer N (e.g., Overrein, 1969; Matzner et al., 1983; Tschaplinski et al., in press).
27      However, most studies show minimal loss of fertilizer N via  leaching following single, large
28      applications of ammonium or urea to N-poor sites (Cole and  Gessel, 1965; Overrein,  1969;
29      Cole et al., 1975; Worsnop and Will, 1980).  As will be shown later, there are some
30      important differences in the way the  nitrogen cycle in soils responds to large, single
31      applications vs. slow, steady applications of N, whether as fertilizer or as atmospheric input.
         August 1991
                                                  10-47
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1      There have been cases where fertilizer has been applied in small, frequent doses, and it is
  2      useful to briefly review some of those studies here before comparing fertilization with
  3      atmospheric N deposition.
  4                                             ,
  5      10.3.3.1  Case Studies of Forest Fertilization at Differing Intervals
  6           Ingestad (1980) has demonstrated in greenhouse experiments that optimum nitrogen
  7      uptake and growth by plants can be achieved by adjusting N inputs to the rate of plant
  8      growth.  In these experiments the rate of N supply (i.e., flux density, or N input per unit
  9      area per unit time) was proven to be the critical variable, not necessarily the concentration of
 10      N in  the uptake solution.  Field experiments comparing standard fertilization with
 11      simultaneous irrigation and fertilization (IF) have  also demonstrated the superior growth
 12      response and fertilizer N recovery by adjusting the flux density of N input (through the IF
 13      treatments) as compared to adding either  one or a few large doses of N as in conventional
 14      fertilization (Aronsson and Elowson, 1980; Ingestad, 1980; Landsberg,  1986).
 15           These authors (Aronsson and Elowson, 1980; Ingestad  1980; Landsberg, 1986) do not
 16      report the effects of slow, steady inputs of N on nitrification and NO3" leaching.  However,
 17      multiple or continuous inputs of fertilizer may stimulate a buildup in populations of nitrifying
 18      bacteria.  A fertilizer experiment involving urea-N applications of 100 kg/ha/yr for 3 years in
. 19      quarterly (25 kg N/ha/3 mo) and annual (100 kg N/ha, in March) to young loblolly pine
 20      (Pinus taedd) and  yellow-poplar (Lirioderidron tulipiferd) plantations in very nitrogen-poor
 21      sites in the Tennessee Valley (Johnson and Todd,  1988) found a buildup in nitrifying
 22      bacteria. In all cases, the quarterly applications resulted in earlier and more pronounced
 23      increases in soil solution nitrate than annual applications.  Figure 10-5 illustrates this pattern
 24      for the loblolly pine site.  Furthermore, only the annual applications resulted in increased
 25      growth (Figure 10-6, top).  The authors concluded that more frequent fertilization in those
 26      particular ecosystems benefitted nitrifiers  more than trees.
 27           In a later study, in a more N-rich site nearby,  exactly the opposite results were obtained
 28      in a study comparing a single urea-N applications  of 50,  150, and 450 kg N/ha with multiple
 29      (three times at 37.5 kg N/ha) applications to a young sycamore (Platanus  occidentalis)
 30      plantation (Tschaplinski et al., in press).  In this case, the authors found much higher soil
 31      solution NO3" concentrations in general (including in the control plots),  no delay in the onset
        August 1991
10-48
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                                        QRNL-DWG 87-1479
     20
     15  —
     10
    T—r—m—rn—i    i    i    t   i
        LOBLOLLY PINE
     NON-MYCORRHIZAL
            CONTROL
        —*.•_*_* I

     20
     15
   ca
   I 10
   in
   o
   Z  5
     20
     15
     10
                     1     E    I
         I     I    I    t    I

           ANNUALLY
                    «*•
    *
...•.**,
                                  i    i    i
                                    QUARTERLY
                         _1_
        JAN APR AUG NOV  FEE  MAY SEP DEC MAR  JUL  OCT JAN APR AUG NOV FE8
             1982       |       1983      |    1984     |      1985       J1986
Figure 10-5. SoU solution nitrate concentrations in untreated control (top), annually
            fertilized (100 kg urea-N ha"1 yr'1, center) and quarterly-fertilized (25 kg
            urea-N ha"1 3 mo"1, bottom) loblolly pine plots. (After Johnson and Todd,
            1988.)                                     •"•«•-•
August 1991
             10-49     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                      Stem  Weight in  Loblolly Fertilizer Study
                      •(000
                      3000-
                      2000-
                      1DOO-
                                                               Column 20
                     Stem  Weight  in  Sycamore Fertilizer study
                      120
Figure 10-6. Top: Growth of loblolly pine in untreated (C), annual (A) (100 kg urea-N
             ha"1 yr"1, center) and quarterly (Q) (25 kg urea-N ha"1 3 mo"1, center)
             applications of urea-N. (After Johnson and Todd, 1988.) Bottom: Growth
             of American sycamore in untreated (C), multiple (37.5 kg urea-N ha"1,
             3 times) and single (450 kg N ha"1) applications of urea-N. (After
             Tschaplinski et al., in press.)
August 1991
10-50
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     of nitrate leaching, and the greatest rates of nitrate leaching in the single 450 kg/ha
 2     application (Figure 10-7). Tree growth response was also greatest in the 450 kg/ha
 3     treatment, but growth responses were also significant in the multiple fertilization treatment
 4     (Figure 10-6, bottom). Thus, in this N-rich site, single fertilization produced the greatest
 5     growth response, but at a higher cost in* terms of nitrate leaching.
 6           The key to differences in nitrate leeching response observed in these two studies was the
 7     initial relative abundance of nitrifiers.  Aerobic incubations in the laboratory showed that the
 8     delay period to  the onset of nitrate production was 25-30 days in the N-poor site and 0-4 days
 9     in the N-rich site (Johnson and Todd, 1988; Tschaplinski et al., in press).  According to
10     Sabey et al.  (1959) delay period for the onset nitrate production is closely related to the initial
11     population of nitrifying bacteria.  These results imply that slow, steady inputs of N
12     characteristic of pollutant inputs may cause more rapid N-saturation in low-N ecosystems than
13     conventional, single-shot fertilization would,  but the opposite would be true in high-N
14     ecosystems.  If the initial population of nitrifiers is low,  the 'slow, steady inputs will favor a
15     buildup of their populations more rapidly than single large inputs will and thus cause a
16     relatively early  increase in nitrate leaching.  If the initial population of nitrifiers is high, the
17     rate of nitrate leaching is more likely to be proportional to the input of N in excess  of plant
18     demand regardless of timing and without delays caused by heterotrophic uptake.
19
20     10.3.3.2  Fate  of N from Pulse Fertilization vs. Atmospheric Deposition
21           Forest fertilization has proven quite/successful in producing growth increases in
22     N-deficient forests, even though trees typically recover only 5-50% of fertilizer N in
23     aboveground biomass (the very high tree recovery found by Bockheim et al., 1986,  being
24     exceptional; Table 10-12). Increased N in the soil is not mirrored directly by more N  uptake
25     except at low levels (see Chapter 9). Fertilizer  N retention in the litter and soil is usually
26      substantial (Table 10-12  and Figure 10-4, center).  There are two possible mechanisms for
27      this high litter/soil N retention:  (1) N uptake by soil heterotrophic organisms, and (2)  non-
28     biological, chemical reactions between ammonia and soil organic matter (Foster et al.,
29      1985a).  The overall result is that the retention of N on an ecosystem level is usually quite
30      high (averaging 60%  of  applied N; Table 10-12).  Furthermore, fertilizer recovery  in trees,
        August 1991
10-51
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                         75
                                             Control
                                 Single  (450 kg N/ha)  Fertilization
                            APHJS   JUt.ZJ'   OCT2B    FEBI

                                1987
              APH4    MAV2
               1SBS
                               Multiple (37.5 x 3 kg K/ha) FertHtzation
                            APR28   JUUS7   OCTSB    FS1
                                                         AW *    MAY 2
                                                         1 9BB
Figure 10-7.  Soil solution nitrate concentrations in untreated (top), single (450 kg N
              ha"1,  center), and multiple (37.5 kg urea-N ha"1, 3 tunes, bottom)
              applications of urea-N. (After Tschaplinski et al., in press.)
August 1991
10-52      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                                                     p
August 1991
10-53
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      soil, and the total ecosystem increase with the rate of fertilization and show no sign of
 2      levelling off even at rates of fertilizer N input of up to 1,500 kg/ha (Figures 10-8 to 10-10).
             to
             JC
             c
             Ci
             *•»
             c
             o
             a>
             CC
                         Ecosystem  N  Retention  vs   Fertilizer  N  Input
                      2000
                      1000-
                                              y « 58.682 + 0.51747x   R*2 = 0.592
                               s . •
                                                       I  "  "	——	—'	
                                                     1000                         2000
                                           Fertilizer   Input   (kg/ha)
      Figure 10-8.  Ecosystem recovery of fertilizer N as a function of fertilizer N input.
1
2
3
4
     Table 10-13 gives a summary of N budgets from the nutrient cycling literature and from
the recently completed Integrated Forest Study (IPS; Johnson and Lindberg, in press).  In this
summary, atmospheric inputs are compared with outputs via soil solution or streamwater
(primarily as NO3") and vegetation increment, or the N necessary to build perennial tissues in
      August 1991
                                        10-54      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                               Tree  N  Retention  vs  Fertilizer  Input
                a
                "S
                tc
                u
                £
                                        y = - 0.44527 +• 0.26974X  R*2 = 0.605
                                                      1000
                                            Fertilizer  Input  (kg/ha)
                                                                                 2000
      Figure 10-9.  Tree recovery of fertilizer N as a function of fertilizer N input.
1     biomass (bole, branches).  It should be noted that the studies prior to IPS measured N
2     deposition principally by bulk precipitation, which substantially underestimates N deposition
3     in many polluted sites (e.g., Lindberg et al., 1986). Most of the IPS data include estimates
4     of both wet and dry deposition, and therefore N deposition values reported there are often
5     much greater than those that would have been reported using bulk collectors. For that
6     reason, the IPS data is shown separately from previous data in Figures 10-11 to 10-13.  It
7     should also be noted that vegetation N uptake values in each of these systems are much
       August 1991
10-55      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                              Soil  N  Retention  vs  Fertilizer  Input
                       800 T
                       600-
             m
             O9
             C
             Cl
                       400-
             o
            to
                       200-
y = 66.634 + 0.23665X  R*2 = 0.241
                                                      1000
                                . 2000
                                           Fertilizer  Input  (kg/ha)
      Figure 10-10.  Soil recovery of fertilizer N as a function of fertilizer N input.
1     higher than vegetation increment, since uptake includes N taken up and returned annually via
2     litterfall and foliar leaching. Vegetation increment was chosen for this analysis because it
3     represents the net N demand of growing vegetation which must be satisfied from sources
4     external to the N cycle (atmospheric deposition or soil "mining").
5          The data in Table 10-13 and Figures 10-11 to 10-13 reveal some interesting contrasts
6     between ecosystem retention of fertilizer vs atmospherically-deposited N.  First, total
7     ecosystem retention of atmospherically-deposited N ranges from over 99% to -266%, with no
      August 1991                             10-56      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  &Q
  t/5

«w
      )
     60
         j?

                                           °°
                         00 £
                        -
              :a « 8   B
                   -
1
a,
1
                                  S  S  S
           I
August 1991
IQ-57     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
       >.
       "5
       en

       e
       "c
       tr
                       Ecosystem  N  Retention  vs  Atmospheric  N  Input
                        30
                        20-
                        10-
                        0-
                       -10-
                       -20-
                       -30'
                           *•
                              •O
                                       20
                                              —1—
                                               40
—I—
 SO
                                                                                80
                                      Atmospheric  N  Input (kg/ha/yr)
      Figure 10-11. Ecosystem N retention as a function of atmospheric N input.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
apparent relationship to atmospheric input (Figure 10-10).  Secondly, vegetation N increment
accounts for nearly all ecosystem N retention in most (19 of 24) cases, and calculated soil N
retention is low and frequently negative (14 of 23 cases) (Table 10-13; Figures 10-12 and
10-13).  There is no relationship between atmospheric N deposition and either tree increment
or calculated soil retention (Figures 10-12 and 10-13).
     The pattern of calculated soil N vs deposition in Figure 10-13 suggests that heterotrophs
are very poor competitors for N, even at very low N input levels. Indeed, it appears as if the
August 1991                            10-58      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                         Tree  N  Increment  vs  Atmospheric  N  Input
                       80
                       BO-
             C8
             c
             ffl
             E
             o
             k.
             o
             c
                       40-
                       20
        *  BULK
        O  IPS
                               £2-
                                   10
                                           —1—
                                            20
      —T—
       30
40
         SO
                  60
                                       Atmospheric  Input  (kg/ha/yr)

      Figure 10-12.  Tree N increment as a function of atmospheric N input.
                                               ••=„".'       -      .-        !     - -   '

1     soil is being "mined" for the N necessary to supply vegetation increment systems with very
2     low atmospheric N inputs.  This is readily apparent when N output is plotted as a function of
3     input minus vegetation increment (Figure 10-14).  Input minus increment can be thought of
4     as N that is available for either (1) soil heterotroph uptake or (2) nitrate leaching.  , A negative
5     value for input-increment implies that either the soil is being "mined" for N to supply tree
6     needs or that there is an unmeasured N input contributing to tree N needs. In either case the
7     data suggest that,  contrary  to views expressed in the literature (see review above), trees are,
8     in the end, more effective  competitors for N than  soil heterotrophs.  Similarly, the nearly 1:1
       August 1991
10-59      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
             (3
             s
       c
       o
       <*•*
       DC
       Z
             O
             03
             T3
             ffl
             £
             o
             §
                             Calculated Soil  N  Retention  vs  N  input
                        20
                        -20-
                 -40-
                        -60
                              O
                              6
                               .Q-
                                 •O
                                    10
                                       20
                                                       30
T~
 40
—i—
 50
                                                                                    60
                                             N  Deposition  (kg/ha)
       Figure 10-13. Calculated soil N retention (Input-increment-leaching) as a function of
                     atmospheric N input.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
relationship between N output and input-increment after the latter exceeds 0 (r2 = 0.84)
indicates that N deposited in excess of vegetation needs is not taken up by heterotrophs but
rather is subject to nitrification and nitrate leaching, perhaps because heterotrophs in these
systems are limited by organic substrates or other nutrients.
     There are several possible explanations for the rather striking differences in soil
N retention and loss patterns between fertilizer and nutrient cycling/air pollution studies.
Firstly,  heterotrophic demand for N in fertilized sites is likely to be greater than in sites
August 1991                             10.60      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                    Nitrogen   Leaching  vs  Inputs-Vegetation  Increment
                  -60
                            Input  Minus  Vegetation  Increment  (kg/ha/yr)
      Figure 10-14. N leaching as a function of atmospheric N input minus tree N increment.
                    Points above the 1:1 line imply net soil loss, and points below the line
                    imply net soil retention.
1     subjected to chronically elevated atmospheric N inputs. Fertilizer N is typically applied to
2     N-deficient ecosystems where N demand by soil heterotrophs is likely to be high, whereas
3     heterotrophic demand for N may have been substantially satisfied in sites with chronically
4     high atmospheric N inputs.  Heterotrophic activity in fertilized sites is also likely to be
5     stimulated by mobilization of soil organic C which typically occurs after fertilization
6     (especially with urea; Ogner,  1972; Foster  et.al.,  1985a).  Secondly, as noted above, the
7     slow, steady inputs of N via air pollution, like slow, steady inputs of fertilizer N probably
       August 1991
10-61
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
,   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 favor nitrification. Thirdly, non-biological retention of N is likely to be greater with
 fertilization than atmospheric deposition.  Ammonium (NH^."1") and ammonia (NH3) fixation
 in 2:1 clays is likely to be substantially increased under conditions of high concentrations of
 one or both following fertilization.  It has also been shown that NH3 can react chemically
 with soil organic matter to form very stable, non-labile compounds (Foster et al., 1985b).
 Conditions following urea fertilization are especially conducive to these reactions in that pH
 is increased and NH3 concentrations are high.  These conditions would not normally occur in
 sites subject to chronically high atmospheric N inputs.

 10.3.4  Effects of Pollutant N Inputs on Soils
 10.3.4.1  Soil Biota
      The most obvious and immediate effects of pollutant N inputs on soils are those on the
 microbial community. An increased activity of heterotrophs  and nitrifiers associated with
 increased decomposition and nitrification rates would seem a likely result of increased
 N inputs.  Studies of microbial responses  to N fertilization have produced mixed results,
 however.  Kelly and Henderson (1978) found increased bacterial activity but reduced
 invertebrate populations one year after fairly high levels of urea fertilization (550 and
 1,100 kg N/ha).  This change was important because invertebrates play a major role in the
 initial breakdown of Utter. However, the authors found little effect of fertilization on the
 decomposition of white oak leaf litter.  Kowalenko et al.  (1978) found that fertilization with
 ammonium nitrate and potassium chloride caused a reduction in soil microbial activity (as
 measured by carbon dioxide evolution) for at least three years.  This may have been due to
 toxic or shock effects due to very large increases in both  nitrogen and other ions over a very
 short time. Weetman and Hill (1973) reviewed the effects of fertilization on soil flora and
fauna and concluded that fertilization had a lasting, stimulating effect despite short-term toxic
effects of fertilizer components (especially ammonium). Again, we must consider the effects
of single,  large inputs of N typical of fertilization studies as opposed to the slow, steady
inputs of N at lower concentration typical  of pollutant inputs. Aside from the limited
information on effects on nitrifiers, virtually nothing is known as to as  to the effects of slow,
steady inputs of N on soil microbial communities.
        August 1991  '
                                         10-62      DRAFT-DO NOT QTJOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      10.3.4.2 Soil Chemistry
 2           The foremost concern about long-term, capacity-controlled effects of excessive
                                                                                r> _|_
 3      N deposition and NO3" leaching is soil acidification and the mobilization of Al   into soil
 4      solution and surface waters. As a prelude to assessing the effects of excessive N deposition
 5      on soil acidification and A13+  mobilization,  a brief review of the components of soil acidity
 6      and cation exchange processes is presented.            ,            ;
 7           Soil acidity can be measured in a number of ways, but for the purposes of this
 8      discussion, we will refer to base saturation as the primary measure or indicator of soil
 9      acidity.  Base saturation refers to the degree to which soil cation exchange sites, negatively-
10     charged sites to  which positively-charged cations are adsorbed, are occupied with base cations
11      (Ca2+, Mg2+, and K+) as opposed to A13+ and H+. Base saturation is a measure of soil
12     acidification, with lower values being more acid.  Figure 10-15 shows a soil with 50% base
13     saturation on the left, and a soil with  10% base saturation on the right.
14          Ulrich (1983) describes the various buffering ranges soils go  through as they acidify:
15     first is the base  cation buffering range, where incoming acid and base cations are exchanged
16     primarily for base cations with very little H+  and A13+ increase (Figure 10-15, left).  As
17     soils acidify, exchangeable, base cations are replaced by exchangeable A13 + and H+,  and
18     soils are said to be in the aluminum buffering range (Figure 10-15, right).  Incoming cations
19     (acid and base)  are exchanged primarily for H+ and A13+ in soils that are in the aluminum
20     buffering range (Figure 10-15, right).                                      . . .       •
21           With the use of a simulation model, Reuss (1983) showed that the transition from the
22     base cation to the aluminum buffering range is very abrupt.  His results showed that soil
23     acidification has little effect upon the concentration of A13+ in soil solution over a large
24     range of base saturation values above 20%.  However, he noted that fairly minor changes in
25     base saturation  within the 10 to 20%  range can cause quite large increases in soil solution
26      A13+ concentration.  This implies that soils with base saturations of  10-20% are extremely
27      sensitive to change (although this does not necessarily imply that vegetation will respond to
28      soil change). A series of simple laboratory column studies could tell us  much about how far
29      some of our forest soils are from the aluminum buffering range and how much additional acid
 30      input might be  required to put them into this range.              .
        August 1991
10-63
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                  Input
                                                               Input
                 Mineral
                 Weathering
                                             Mineral
                                             Weathering
                              Leachfng
                                                                                10%
                                                                                Base
                                                                                Sat.
                                                                  Leaching
       Figure 10-15.  Schematic diagram of cation exchange for base cations, A13+ and H+ in
                      circumneutral (50% base saturation, left) and acid (10% base saturation,
                      right) soils.
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
 1
2
3
4
      Once soils are in the aluminum buffering range, the rate of base cation leaching will
 obviously decrease because A13+ is now a dominant cation in soil solutions.  In a soil free of
 vegetation, continued inputs from the atmospheric deposition (which contains base cations as
 well as H+) will eventually acidify the soil to the point where base cation outputs equal base
 cation inputs.  With forest or other vegetation growing on  the soil, however, continued base
 cation uptake could reduce the base saturation of the soil to the point where export of base
 cations is less than input by  deposition (Figure 10-15, right). Thus,  vegetation  uptake can,
 by depleting soil exchangeable base cations, cause the soil  to begin accumulating base cations
 even when the soil is  subject to high leaching rates.  Of course, this  accumulation of base
 cations is accompanied by substantially increased leaching of A13+, and the potentially
 detrimental effects of  the latter must be considered.
     The same cation exchange principles that will eventually cause a soil to begin
accumulating incoming base cations when soils acidify into the aluminum buffering range  can
August 1991                              10_64     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     also cause an ecosystem to begin accumulating an individual cation (Ca2+, Mg2+, or K+) if
 2     tree uptake depletes soils of an individual cation (Johnson and Todd,  1987).  In this case, the
 3     conservation of the individual cation in question need not be accompanied by significant
 4     overall soil acidification and increased leaching of A13+; leaching of the other base cations
 5     may be increased instead. We noted such a situation with respect to  Ca2+ in an oak-hickory
 6     forest on Walker Branch watershed, Tennessee (Johnson et al.,  1985).  In this ecosystem,
 7     tree Ca2+ is very high, soils are very low in exchangeable Ca2+, and consequently Ca2+
 8     leaching is low. Thus, the ecosystem shows a net Ga2+ gain from atmospheric inputs
 9     (accompanied by net losses  of Mg2+, K+, and Na+).
10          The greatest uncertainty in assessing and projecting rates of exchangeable base cation
11     depletion and/or soil acidification is the estimation of primary mineral weathering rates. The
12     weathering of primary soil minerals (e.g., hornblende, feldspar, plagioclase) represents an
13     input to the exchangeable base cation pool (Figure 10-16).  Calculations of the potential rate
14     of soil change from exchangeable pools and input-output budgets (e.g., Tomlinson, 1983)
15     represent the worst-case  scenario; -that is,  they assume that, weathering is zero.  A high rate of
16     soil leaching offset by a  high rate of weathering results in a high rate of turnover but not a
17     net depletion of exchangeable cations.
18           Equations and simple  models of soil weathering are available for primary to secondary
19     mineral transformations  (e.g., Lindsay, 1979).  However, these equations are of little value
20     for soils with sizeable nonexchangeable base cation reserves contained in ill-defined minerals
21     (such as amorphous Fe and Al oxides; Johnson et al., 1985).  A further complication arises
22     when mineral weathering is enhanced by organic acids formed in forest litter or exuded by
23     tree roots (Boyle and Voigt, 1973).  Thus, at present, there are only empirical approaches to
24     assessing weathering  such as mass balance calculations. One mass balance approach involves
25      measuring fluxes and changes in exchangeable cation pools over time and calculating
26      weathering by difference (Matzner, 1983).  A  simpler mass balance  approach is to estimate
27      the total weathering' loss from a soil by the difference in soil element content at present and
28      that of an equivalent amount of primary minerals (i.e.,  element content at the time the soil
29      began to  form) and divide by the amount of time the soil has been exposed to weathering
 30      (e.g., since the last glaciation) (Mazzarino et al., 1983).  The latter  gives an average
 31      weathering rate over geologic time, but it does not represent current weathering rates in the
        August 1991
10-65
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                            Low fnput
                                                                  High Input
                         Leaching
                                               Mineral
                                               Weathering
                                                        Leaching
                                                                               10%
                                                                               Base
                                                                               Sat.
        Figure 10-16.  Schematic diagram of cation exchange for base cations, A13+  and H+ in
                       acid soils with low (right) and high (left) atmospheric deposition rates.
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
soil.  The former method gives a better estimate of current weathering rates in the soil, but it
is subject to large uncertainties due to errors in each of the estimates used to calculate it.
Nonetheless, the plot-scale mass balance method, while imprecise, seems the best for
obtaining realistic estimates of current soil weathering rates, especially in systems where
leaching has been increased by artificial acid irrigation (e.g., Stuanes,  1980).
     Because forest soils acidify naturally, it must be true that weathering rates do not keep
pace with base cation denudation rates, even under pristine conditions. The relative
contribution of acid deposition to the rate of acidification can be assessed by measuring
element fluxes (e.g., Ulrich, 1980; Matzner, 1983; Johnson et al., 1985), and the actual
magnitude of the acidification rate (which equals base cation export minus weathering input)
can be estimated by measuring changes in exchangeable base cations and acidity through time
(taking into account seasonal variations in surface soils; see Haines and Cleveland, 1981).
The effects of excess N and S deposition on the  rate of soil acidification cannot be evaluated
       August 1991
                                          10-66
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     by simply measuring changes in soils through time, however, because the natural rate of soil
 2     acidification (via natural leaching and vegetation uptake) cannot be accounted for by simply
 3     measuring changes in soils. If soils do not change during the measurement period,  it can be
 4     stated that neither  acid deposition nor natural processes have caused soil acidification.
 5     However, if soils have acidified, measurements of fluxes are necessary to determine the
 6     extent to which acid deposition has contributed to the observed rate of ^acidification.
 7          There are very few proven, documented cases in which excessive atmospheric
 8     N deposition has caused soil acidification, but there is no  doubt that the" potential exists,
 9     given high enough inputs for a sufficiently long time.  Van Breemen et al.  (1982, 1987)
10     report high acidification pressure on forests of The Netherlands subject to very high inputs of
11     N from nearby agricultural activities (often  considerably in excess of 50 kg 1ST' ha"Lyr" ;
12     van Breemen et al., 1982, 1987; Nilsson and Grennfelt, 1988).  The hydrogen ion  budgets
13     for these sites indicate the clear possibility (if not probability)  that soils have been acidified,
14     but actual changes in soil acidity over time  have not been measured.
15           Soil acidification is usually thought of as an undesirable effect, but in some cases, the
16     benefits of alleviating N deficiency may outweigh the detriments of soil acidification. For
17     instance, Van Miegroet and Cole (1984) found that excessive N2 fixation by red alder (Alms
18     rubrd) caused large increases in NO3" leaching and a significant amount of soil acidification
19     relative to adjacent Douglas-fir (Psmdotusga menziesii) stands, yet Douglas-fir growth is
20     invariably superior on sites formerly occupied by red alder due to the differences in N .status
21      (Tarrant and Miller,  1963; Binkley, 1983; Van Miegroet  et al.,  1991).
22        .-,-..        .  .         ,                .        —
23      10.3.5 Effects on Natural Waters
24           A major recent concern over the effects of soil acidification due to atmospheric
25      deposition of both N and S is the mobilization of A13+, which can be toxic to some
26      terrestrial  vegetation and might be carried to surface waters where it is toxic to fish. As in
27      the case of soil acidification, a brief review of processes  leading to soil solution and surface
28      water acidification will be presented.as a prelude to discussions as to the effects of
29      atmospheric N deposition on these processes.                   .•
 30           Increased concentrations of NO3" or any other mineral acid anion (e.g., SO4  ", or Cl")
 31      in soil solution lead to increases in the concentrations of  all cations in order to maintain
     -n< August 1991
10-67
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 charge balance. Figure 10-16 shows the effects of low (left) and high (right) inputs of
 cations (which are also accompanied by low and high inputs of anions, respectively) to'the
 fictitious soil with 10% base saturation shown on the right of Figure 10-15.  As can readily
 be seen, the concentrations of H+ and A13+ in soil solution are determined not only by base
 saturation, but also by total cation (and anion) input rates.  Extremely acid soils are a
 necessary but not sufficient condition for the mobilization of A13+; elevated inputs of cations
 and anions, whether by atmospheric deposition,  fertilization,  or natural processes must also
 occur.
     The composition of the cations in a solution in equilibrium with soil can be described
 fairly accurately by well-known selectivity equations developed more than 50 years ago
 (Reuss, 1983). In essence, these equations predict that the concentration of a given cation in
 soil solution is governed by the proportion of this cation on the soil exchange complex and
 the total ionic concentration in soil solution.
     Reuss (1983) points out one very interesting aspect of these equations with respect to
 the question of A13+ mobilization:  as total ionic concentration increases, the concentration of
 A13+ increases to the 3/2 power of the increase in the concentrations of ratio Ca2+ and
 Mg2+ and to the third power of K+, Na+, and  H+. In other words, as total cation and
 anion concentrations increase, individual cation concentrations increase as follows:
A13+ > Ca2+, Mg2+ > K+, Na+, H+. Thus, soil solution A13+ concentrations increase
not only as the soil acidifies (i.e., as the proportion of A13+ on the exchange complex
increases) but also as the total ionic concentration of soil solution increases.  (These equations
also imply that K+, Na+, and H+ will be the least affected by increased NO3" leaching.)
     There are several studies in which A13+ concentrations in both soil solution and
streamwaters have been shown to be positively correlated with NO3~ concentrations. The
NO3" - A13+ pulses in soil solution have implications for forest nutrition and are invoked in
some hypotheses of forest decline discussed in the next section. Researchers on aquatic
effects of acid deposition have long noted springtime pulses of NO3", A13 + , and H+ in acid-
affected surface waters of the Northeastern U.S. (Galloway et al., 1980; Driscoll et al.,
1989).  In less acid systems, NO3" pulses may be associated with base cations rather than
A13+, and H+:  Foster et al. (1989) note pulses of NO3" and base cations in soil solutions
and streams at the Turkey Lakes site in Ontario. Driscoll et al. (1989) reviewed the North
       August 1991
                                        10-68
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     American data relevant to the role of nitrogen in the acidification of surface waters and
 2     explored relationships between atmospheric N deposition, soil C/N ratio and streamwater
 3     nitrate concentrations.  They found no consistent relationships between these factors, and
 4     suggested that vegetation uptake, as hypothesizedjby Vitousek and Reiners (1975) may be one
 5     of the most important factors in determining streamwater nitrate concentrations.
 6
 7     10.3.6  Effects of Pollutant N Deposition upon Vegetation Nutrient Status
 8           Because N is the most commonly limiting nutrient for growth in forest ecosystems in
 9     North America (Cole and Rapp, 1981),  deposition of N in any biologically available form to
10     most forest ecosystems is likely to produce increased vegetation growth to some extent.  The
11     degree of response will depend upon the amount of N deposited, the N demand  for
12     vegetation, and the competition from soil heterotrophic organisms for this N, as described
13     above. In addition to changes in growth, increased N deposition can cause significant
14     changes in tree physiological function, susceptibility to insect and disease attack, and even
15     plant community structure.  In this section, we will briefly review plant physiological
16     responses related to increased N nutrition (see Section 11.4 for more in depth coverage), and
17     give a more  in-depth review of soil-mediated effects of N deposition on vegetation and an
18     update on plant community/successional changes that seem to be occurring in high-deposition
                                          \                  f
19     areas of Europe.                                       v
20                  ,                                          !
21      10.3.6.1 Physiological Effects of Excess N Inputs       |
22           Nitrogen addition can have several impacts upon trees in addition to improvement of
23      growth, including susceptibility to other pollutants. Nitrogen fertilization has been noted to
24      increase the  resistance of eastern white  pine (Pinus strobus) to SO2  injury (Cotrufo and
25      Berry, 1970).  Nitrogen fertilization usually depressed mycorrhizal development (Weetman
26      and Hill, 1973; Menge et al., 1977). Because the mycorrhizal association is thought to be an
27      adaption to nutrient deficient conditions, suppression of mycorrhizae by N inputs might be
28      expected.
29            Several hypotheses posed to explain current forest declines in  eastern North America
30      invoke the effects of excess N deposition upon physiological processes. These physiological
 31      responses generally invoke altered carbohydrate allocation causing increased sensitivity to
        August 1991
10-69
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 drought, frost, or insect attack. Friedland, et al. (1984) posed the hypothesis that excessive
 N deposition induced growth later into autumn which caused  susceptibility to frost in red
 spruce in the Northeastern United States, Evans (1986) followed up on this, observing that
 winter injury apparently occurred to first-year twigs and adding the alternative hypothesis that
 excessive N deposition could have caused reduced bark formation as well as or instead of late
 growth into the autumn in first-year twigs.  Waring (1987) poses an hypothesis in which
 boreal coniferous species are unable, to store nitrate taken up from soil solutions, necessitating
 the formation of amino acids in green leaves, causing reduced allocation of carbohydrate to
 roots and increased susceptibility to drought and pathogens.
       More recent studies on red spruce response to nitrogen  lend no support to the various
 hypotheses for N-induced physiological damage and decline described above.  Sheppard et al.
 (1989) found the evidence for pollutant-induced susceptibility  to freezing injury in red spruce
 to be weak, based upon laboratory studies with detached shoots.  DeHayes et al.  (1989)
 found that treatment of red spruce seedlings with ammonium nitrate increased rather than
 decreased cold tolerance.  Thus, the hypothesis that nitrogen causes direct damage to red
 spruce is not supported by laboratory studies.  Climate  is thought to play a major role in the
 severe red spruce decline in the northeastern U.S., perhaps with some additional  exacerbation
 due to the direct effects of acid mist on foliage (Lucier  et al.,  1990). There is some evidence
 to suggest that indirect effects of nitrogen saturation,  namely nitrate and aluminum leaching,
 may be contributing factors to red spruce decline in the southern Appalachians, and this
 literature is reviewed below.

 10.3.6.2  Soil-Mediated Effects on Vegetation
     N inputs in excess of tree and heterotrophic N demand may cause immobilization of
 some nutrients (especially P and S) and losses of other cation nutrients due to increased
 nitrate leaching, as  discussed above. In some cases, the benefits of enhanced N status will
 greatiy outweigh the detrimental effects of decreased availability of other nutrients.  For
 instance, the benefits of N fixation during a red alder (Alnus rubra) stage to subsequent
 Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) forests in the Pacific Northwest are well-documented
despite the fact that excessive N fixation during the red  alder stage causes considerable
P immobilization and soil acidification (Van Miegroet and Cole, 1984).  In other cases,
        August 1991
                                         10-70
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     effects of excessive N deposition may be clearly deleterious to plant nutrition.  Boxmann
 2     et al. (1988) report that excessive NH4+ deposition to soils in which nitrification is inhibited
 3     causes serious nutritional imbalances and even toxic effects to some forests in The
 4     Netherlands. According to Boxmann et al. physiological mechanisms for these effects might
 5     include inhibition of photosynthetic phosphorylation, starch synthesis, protein synthesis
 6     (causing a buildup of amino acids), chlorophyll synthesis, and saturation of membrane lipids
 7     with NH4+, reducing their ion selectivity and making them more permeable.  Increased
                                                                                  7(2 J_
 8     membrane permeability may allow potentially toxic ions to be taken up (e.g., AF"1") and
 9     allow nutrient ions to be released (e.g.,  Ca2+).  Deleterious effects of excess N deposition
10     can occur via soil interactions as described above, or via aboveground processes.  For
11     instance, Roelofs et al.  (1987) report that K and Mg deficiencies in declining Dutch forests
12     are caused by excessive foliar leaching due to high inputs of NH4+.
13          Ulrich (1983) hypothesized that these nitrate-induced Al3"1" pulses during warm dry
14     years caused root damage and were a major contributor to forest decline observed in
15     Germany during the mid 1980s. This hypothesis is disputed by other German forest scientists
16   "  who point out that forest decline occurred on base-rich as well as base-poor soils (the base
17     -rich soils not being subject to A13+ pulses) (e.g., Rehfuess,  1987). Mulder et al. (1987)
18     document NO3" - A13 + pulses in soil solutions from forest sites in  the Netherlands.
19     Aluminum toxicity is one of several nitrogen-related hypotheses posed to explain forest
20     decline in that country.  (Other hypotheses are discussed in the following section.) Johnson
21     et al. (in press) found pulses of NO3" and total Al in soil solutions during late autumn from
22     red spruce forests in the Great Smoky Mountains of North Carolina. The pulses were
23     attributed to a combination of high rates of nitrogen mineralization and low uptake in these
24     over mature forests. The soils at these  sites were very rich in N, (up to 10,000 kg N/ha) arid
25     atmospheric N deposition was also quite high (26 kg N ha'1 yr"1),  both of which contribute to
26     the high rates of NO3~ leaching at these sites. The peak total Al concentrations (70 ^cM/L)
27     associated with these NO3~ pulses were  below the threshold for monomeric Al where visible
28     injury to red spruce seedlings occurs in laboratory studies (200 jwM/L; Joslin  and Wolfe,
29      1988),  and  there was no visible evidence of red  spruce decline at these sites.  However, the
30     possibility of Al inhibition of Ca and Mg uptake cannot be excluded; spot checks revealed
31     that 80-90% of total Al in these soil solutions was in monomeric form, and inhibition of Ca
        August 1991
10-71
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
31
 and Mg uptake at monomeric Al levels of well below 200 /*M/L has been noted (Thornton
 et al., 1987).  In this vein, it is noteworthy that Bondietti et al. (1989) found an inverse
 correlation between Al and Ca concentrations in tree rings of red spruce in the southern
 Appalachians.
      Shortle and Smith (1988) present an hypothesis for the decline of red spruce in which
 Al inhibits Ca  uptake, Ca deficiency reduces cambial growth (since the demand for Ca per
 unit of cambium surface is constant), reduced cambial growth causes a reduction in
 functioning sapwood, and reduced sapwood causes a reduction in leaf area. However, A.H.
 Johnson (1983) finds no support for the Al hypothesis in the seriously declining forests of
 Camel's Hump, Vermont.  He found that while the degree of decline increases with
 elevation, both Al concentration and Al:Ca ratios in fine roots decrease with elevation while
 the degree of dieback and decline increases with elevation.  He further points out that high
 elevation soils where much of the decline occurs are histosols (organic soils) where Al
 toxicity is unlikely due to the mitigating effects of organics on soil solution Al activity,
      Thus, the situation with respect to the Al hypothesis and red spruce decline remains
 very unclear.  There is little support for the Al  hypothesis in the northeast, where decline is
 very severe.  Cook and Johnson (1989) conclude from extensive tree ring and climatic
 analyses that red spruce has been out of equilibrium with its climate for the last 150 years,
 making it susceptible to damage from a variety  of causes, both naturally- and
 anthropogenically-induced. Given the soil solution Al levels found in southern Appalachian
 red spruce forests, the possibility of some Al effect cannot be excluded, yet decline in this
 region is much more subtle (being evidenced primarily by somewhat controversial tree ring
 analyses) and no unexpected levels of mortality  have yet occurred.

 10.3.6.3 Ecosystem-Level Responses to N Deposition
     Growth responses to increased N inputs may not always be regarded as desirable,
 especially if they result in changes in species composition. For instance, improved growth
 and vitality due to  increased N deposition may not be deemed desirable in wilderness areas.
 Different genera and species respond differentially to increased N availability; for instance,
deciduous species (aniosperms) generally have a greater demand for N per  unit biomass
produced than do coniferous species (gymnosperms) (Cole and Rapp,  1981).  Tilman (1987)
        August 1991
                                         10-72
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      found marked changes in species composition as a result of experimental N additions to
 2      abandoned old fields in Minnesota.  Thus, there is a real possibility for changes in ecosystem
 3      composition with increased N loading.  Changes from heathland to grassland in Holland have
 4      been attributed to high rates of N deposition (Roelofs et al., 1987).  Ellenberg (1987) points
 5      to further species changes in Central European ecosystems as a likely consequence of elevated
 6      N.  He states that "more than 50% of the plant species in Central Europe can only compete
 7      on stands that are deficient in nitrogen supply".
 8           There may be significant ecosystem-level effects of N via host-pathogen interactions.
 9      Increased N inputs can affect tree resistance to insect and disease either positively or
10      negatively.   Nitrogenous fertilizers are known to reduce the production of phenols in plant
11      tissues, thereby reducing resistance to infection by pathogenic fungi (Shigo, 1973).   Hollis
12      et al. (1975) noted that additions of P and N to sites deficient in these elements increased the
13      incidence of fusiform rust in slash pine.  On the other hand, increased N input will increase
14      resistance to bark beetle and other insect attacks if it improves tree nutrient status (Weetman
15      and Hill, 1973). In addition to  changes in tree physiology, increased N inputs produces
16      changes in stand structure which produce changes in understory composition and microclimate
17      that could either increase or decrease the likelihood of insect or disease attack.  Brunsting and
18      Heil (1985), addressing  the recent changes from heather (Calluna) to grasses in The
19      Netherlands, note that N fertilization leads to increased growth of grasses only when Calluna
20      stands are opened up by beetle attacks.  By increasing the N concentration of heather foliage,
21      high N input stimulates larval growth and increases body weight of beetles.
22           The effects of increased N inputs on host-pathogen interactions remain largely
23      speculative;  insufficient  research on this subject has been done to make many definitive
24      statements.   Nonetheless, these  interactions are potentially very important, given the
25      devastation that pathogens can produce, and further attention should be given  to the  issue of
26      effects of increased N deposition, both positive and negative, on host-pathogen interactions.
27
28      10.3.7 Critical Loads for  Atmospheric N Deposition
29           Recently,  there have been  efforts to set critical loads for N deposition for natural
30      ecosystems (Nilsson and Grennfelt,  1988; Fox et al., 1989; Schulze et al., 1989). In that the
        August 1991
10-73
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
values for these critical loads may take on considerable political importance, it is appropriate
to examine the assumptions that have been made in defining them.
     The Workshop held at Skokloster, Sweden in March 1988 (Nilsson and Grennfelt,
1988) adopted the following definition for a critical load:  "A quantitative estimate of an
exposure to one or more pollutants below which significant harmful effects on specified
sensitive elements of the environment do not occur according to present knowledge".  In this
document (Nilsson and Grennfelt,  1988) and the subsequent publication synthesizing much of
it (Shulze et al., 1989), nitrogen critical loads were aimed "to protect soils from long-term
chemical changes with respect to base saturation"  (p. 17, Nilsson and Grennfelt, 1988;
p. 451, Schulze et al., 1989).  The critical loads for N are estimated from two equations.
The first equation is posed as a one that must be satisfied in order to maintain a constant
exchangeable base cation pool in the soil:                                           ,
               BC leaching < BC weathering + BC deposition - BC growth
where BC=base cations. Equation (1) is perhaps best understood by rearranging:
               BC leaching + BC growth < BC weathering + BC deposition
                                (1)
                                (2)
     Equation (2) is simply a statement of mass balance for the soil cation exchange complex
and states that removal rates via leaching (BC leaching) and plant uptake (BC growth) must
be equalled or exceeded by inputs via deposition and weathering (the release of base cations
from unavailable, mineral forms to ionic  states available for plant uptake, leaching, or
replenishing cation exchange sites) in order to keep soils from acidifying (keep base
saturation constant).  This is followed by another equation describing the roles of NQ3" and
SO42" in causing soil leaching:
                    Nitrate leaching + Sulfate leaching < BC leaching
                                (3)
     The authors state that equation (3) assumes that all base cation leaching is caused by
nitrate and sulfate, ignoring the potentially substantial cation leaching by naturally-produced
        August 1991
                                         10-74
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
carbonic and organic acids (e.g., Johnson et al., 1977). However, the use of the "less than"
(<) as well as the "equal to" (=)  sign in Equation (3) does, in fact, allow for leaching by
naturally-produced carbonic and organic acids i  Base cation leaching will be less than nitrate
plus sulfate leaching if aluminum and hydrogen ions are present to significant extent in soil
solutions.
Combining (1) and  (3), the authors obtain:
              Acceptable Nitrate Leaching <, BC weathering + BC deposition
                            - BC growth -  Sulfate leaching
                                (4)
     In obtaining Equation (4), the authors assumed (without stating so) that only the "equal
to" (=) and not the "less than" sign in Equation (3) applied; in short, they assumed that all
base cation leaching was due to nitrate +  sulfate leaching, and that no H+ and A13+ leaching
occurred.
     To estimate nitrate leaching, the authors use the nitrogen balance equation:
               N input < N growth + N immobilization — N mineralization
                      + N denitrification — N fixation + N leaching
Again, this equation is best understood by rearranging:

                 N leaching > (N input + N fixation + N mineralization)
                   — (N growth  + N immobilization + N denitrification)
                                 (5)
                                (6)
     Equation (6) can be thought of as a mass balance equation for the soil inorganic N pool
with the first three terms being inputs to that pool and the second three terms being outputs
from that pool other than leaching.  The inputs consist of atmospheric deposition (N input),
fixation (N fixation), and release from soil organic matter during decomposition
(N mineralization).  The non-leaching outputs include plant uptake (N growth), heterotrophic
uptake (N immobilization), and denitrification (N denitrification).  The remainder must be
leaching (N leaching). It is assumed in their analysis that N denitrification and N fixation are
negligible in forest ecosystems and that N immobilization — N mineralization, which  is the
        August 1991
                                          10-75
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 net annual N accumulation in the soil, equals only 1-3 kg ISP ha"1 • yr"1. The latter numbers,
 are based upon an estimate of the net N accumulation in soils of Sweden since the last
 glaciation (obtained by dividing nominal soil N content values by the number of years since
 glaciation).  Soil N accumulation rates can be much higher:  Jenkinson (1970) documents net
 annual soil N accumulations of over 50 kg • ha"1 • yr"1 over an 81-year period (from 1883 to
 1964) after a former agricultural site (Broadbalk) was allowed to revert to forest at the
 Rothamsted Experiment Station in England.  This high rate of soil N accumulation was
 greater than thought possible from atmospheric deposition alone and may have been in part
 due to the action of free-living N-fixers in the soil.  Liming may have played some role in
 stimulating these high accumulation rates;  a nearby site (Geescroft) that had not been limed
 showed N accumulations of only 23  kg • ha"1 • yr"1 over the same period (Jenkinson, 1970).
      Given these equations and estimates of the various parameters within them, the authors
 calculate critical loads  for various forest ecosystems.  These values range from a low of
 3-5 kg N • ha"1 • yr"1 for raised bogs to a  high of 5-20 kg N • ha"1  • yr"1 for deciduous
 forests.  A critical concentration for  nitrate in groundwater (10 mg  N/L) is then calculated
 based upon an assumption of precipitation  surplus (precipitation minus evapotranspiration) of
 100 to 400 mm yr"1, giving values of 10 to 40 kg N  • ha"1 • yr"1.
      In contrast to the rather quantitative approach taken at the Skokloster Workshop, a far
 more subjective approach is taken in determining critical N loads for wilderness areas in the
 U.S.  Forest Service-sponsored workshop held at Gary Arboretum, Millbrook, New York in
 May, 1988.  In this case, rather than attempting to come up with specific critical loads, the
 workshop participants were asked to  establish "green" and "red" lines, the former being
 values below which deleterious effects are  very unlikely to occur, and the latter being values
 above which deleterious effects will very likely occur. The "Rationale used in selecting
 nitrogen values"  for terrestrial ecosystem critical loads consists of a brief overview of the
 nitrogen cycle and some educated guesswork, in view of the fact that "data on N cycling in
 wilderness areas  is quite scarce at best, and in many areas completely lacking" (p.  12).
 Despite the lack  of N cycling data, the authors provide guesses at "green" and "red" line
values for specific wilderness areas ranging from 3-10 kg N kg • ha"1 • yr"1 for "green"
values and 10-15 kg • ha"1 • yr"1 for  "red"  values. These values quantitatively similar to
       August 1991
                                         10-76
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     those obtained in the Skokloster workshop, and actually show very little spread between
 2     "green" and "red" lines.
 3    :
 4     10.3.8  An Evaluation of Critical Loads Calculations for N Deposition
 5           There are a number of points that need to be emphasized before the Skokloster critical
 6     load values are used for assessment or policy-making. First, the assumption that soils can
 7     accumulate only 1-3 kg N • ha"1 •  yr"1 is certainly not valid over the short term in most forest
 8     ecosystems, as shown amply by a  number of forest fertilization studies described in
 9     Section 10.3.3.  Having stated that, however, it should also be noted that both heterotroph
10     and ecosystem-level recovery of atmospherically-deposited N seems to be lower than  that of
11     fertilizer N, as also noted also in Section 10.3.3.  The authors of the critical load document
12     (Nilsson and Grennfelt, 1988) recognize that N retention in the soil can be quite high on a
13     temporary basis, but they assume that only net increment in trees is significant over the
14     longer-term (i.e., harvest rotation  lengths of 50-100 years).  Nonetheless, even "temporary"
15     retention of atmospherically-deposited N could be significant:  if N-deficient systems  can
16     retain as much as 600 kg N • ha"1  in the soil by heterotrophs (see Table 10-13), an
17     atmospheric N input of 25 kg '• ha"1 '  yr"1 could be retained for 24 years. Recall that
18     Jenkinson  (1970) found an average annual N accumulation of about 25 kg • ha"1 • yr"1 in soils
19     at the Rothamsted Experiment Station in England over an 80-year period (1888-1962).  This
20     accumulation, which was calculated by differences in measured soil N content over time, is
21     of special  interest in that it actually exceeded estimated atmospheric N deposition over that
22     period. It seems clear that estimates of atmospheric N inputs to these sites are low, due
23     either to underestimates of dry deposition or N-fixation
24           A critical unknown in  soil heterotrophic N retention is the change (if any)  in the relative
25     competitiveness of trees, heterotrophs, and nitrifiers, as noted  earlier.  There is  some
26     evidence to suggest  that nitrifiers become more competitive with slow, steady inputs (Johnson
27     and Todd, 1988). Also, it is clear that tree N from the irrigation and fertilizer experiments
28     noted above (Aronsson and Elowson, 1980; Ingestad, 1980; Landsberg,  1986) can increase
29     substantially with increasing N deposition rate,  bringing into question calculations of  N
30     sequestering by trees from areas that  are not N-saturated.
        August 1991
10-77
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1          Also inherent in at least the final calculations is the assumption that no natural leaching
  2     processes are currently contributing to soil acidification.  That is, all base cation leaching is
  3     attributed to sulfate and nitrate.  This assumption is clearly false; carbonic and organic acids
  4     are present in all soil systems and contribute to leaching and acidifying processes to varying
  5     degrees (Johnson et al., 1977; Richter et al.,  1983;  Uirich, 1980). The net result of this
  6     assumption, ironically enough, is to underestimate soil acidification (i.e., the acidification by '
  7     carbonic and organic acids do not enter into the calculations) and therefore set critical loads
  8     (as defined in these calculations) too low.                    -
  9          The weakest link in this chain of calculations is, as always, BC weathering. While the
 10     chemical transformations of many weathering reactions are well-known (Lindsay, 1979),     :
 11     quantification of weathering rates under field  conditions has remained elusive.  The
 12     weathering numbers  used in calculating these  critical loads are crude  mass balance estimates
 13     based amounts of minerals and cation nutrients left in soils 8,000-12,000 years after the  last
 14     glaciation (when fresh minerals were first exposed). These calculations do not account for
 15     changes in weathering rates with time (rates were likely much  faster initially with fresh
 16     minerals than later during the course of weathering) nor do they  account for  the possibility of
 17     increased weathering rates with increased acidification pressure or with vegetation rooting
 18     (e.g., Boyle and Voigt, 1973).
 19          The entire critical loads concept which formed the basis of  the Skokloster document is
20     based upon preventing  soil acidification.  Implicit in this goal is the assumption that soils
21     reach and remain in some kind of steady-state, non-acid condition in  nature,  an assumption
22     that is probably fallacious given the presence of extremely acid soils in pristine, unmanaged
23     forests (e.g., Johnson et al., 1977). Furthermore, it is  not at all  clear that soil acidification .is
24     always harmful.  As  shown in the red alder/Douglas fir succession example above,  the
25     benefits of N deposition may well outweigh the detriments of soil acidification.  It should be
26     kept in mind tihat forests of the northern hemisphere have historically been nitrogen deficient,
27     and that growth increases brought about by  fertilization (often at  levels far in excess of
28     critical loads) have been regarded as beneficial, at least in commercial forest  lands.   Value
29     judgements inevitably come into play in setting critical loads for pollutant deposition of
30     nutrients, especially in the case of N.
        August 1991
10-78
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
     The "green" and "red" lines for N deposition established for wilderness areas in the
Gary Arboretum workshop (Fox et al.,  1989) were almost totally subjective guesses and are
therefore open to many criticisms and argument.  Given the fact that wilderness areas,
especially those in the western U.S., are very likely  nitrogen-limited, even the "green"  lines
are not a guarantee of having  no effect, as is acknowledged by the authors.  They state,
however, that "in our judgement, the Green Line levels are sufficiently low that perceptible
deleterious effects upon plant  health, changes in species composition, or degradation of water
quality are unlikely".  In view of the very low  N deposition rates in some parts of the
western U.S., (1-2  kg • ha"1 •  yr"1;,Table 10-13), it seems likely that increases of up to
10 kg  • ha"1 •  yr"1 will result in some increases in plant growth, plant health, and, quite
possibly, changes in species composition.  The judgement that deleterious effects on plant
health  and  water quality are unlikely to occur at these levels seems to be a reasonable one for
the short term (i.e., until biological N demand  is satisfied in these slow-growing ecosystems),
but remain open to  serious question over:the long term.

10.3,9  Conclusions
     There is little  doubt that N deposition has a pronounced  effect on many, if not most
terrestrial ecosystems.  Because most forest ecosystems in North America are'N deficient,
one of the  most noticeable initial  changes in response to increased N deposition is likely to be
a, growth increase.  Whether this  growth increase is deemed desirable or undesirable in  a
particular ecosystem is entirely a  matter of management objectives (timber production or
species preservation), and, ultimately, value judgements by society.
     All current information indicates that such "N-saturated" forests are relatively rare and
limited in extent (e.g., Cole and Rapp,  1981), especially in managed forests.  Forest
management practices, especially with respect to harvesting and fire, will have a major  effect
upon the degree to  which forests become N saturated.  The critical load values given in the
Skolster document (Nilsson and Grennfelt, 1988) are unlikely  to produce N-saturation in
highly-productive, intensively-managed  forests of the timberbelts in the southeastern and
northwestern U.S. that are frequently harvested and/or subjected to control burning. Indeed,
there is considerable concern that intensive management practices in  these forests are causing
N depletion (Boyle  and Ek, 1972).
        August 1991
                                          10-79
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
      Given the great variation in both natural forest N uptake rates and management
 intensity, it is not reasonable to assign one critical load for all forest ecosystems. Intensively
 managed, short-rotation forests might beneficially utilize up to 100 kg N ha"1 yr"1, whereas a
 value as low as 10 kg N ha"1 yr"1 may be produce undesired growth increases in very slow-
 growing virgin forests in wilderness areas.  Given some knowledge about forest uptake rates
 and current N status, critical loads might be calculated on a site-by-site basis, but regional
 values will invariably prove invalid for many (if not most) forests within the region to which
 they are applied.                                         '  !
 10.4  TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM EFFECTS-VEGETATION
     Subsequent to the dry or wet deposition of N forms from the atmosphere (Section 10.2)
 nitrogen containing compounds can impact the terrestrial ecosystem through direct effects on
 plant metabolic processes, or indirectly by modifying the nitrogen cycle and associated soil
 chemical properties. However, interpretation of the effects of N deposition at the level of the
 ecosystem becomes difficult because of the complex interactions which exist between
 biological, physicochemical, and climatic factors (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
 1982).

 10.4.1  Direct Effects
     Direct effects of reactive nitrogen compounds on terrestrial ecosystems are  defined as
 those effects that impact individual plants by disturbing "normal" physiological processes.
 Because information on the direct effects of NO and NO2 alone and in combination with
 other pollutants have been described in detail in Sections 9.3 through 9.6, they will not be
 discussed here.              :
     Very little information is available on the direct effects of nitric acid vapor on
vegetation and essentially no information on its effects on ecosystems.  Norby et al.  (1989)
reported that nitric acid vapor (0.075 ppmv) induced  nitrate reductase activity (NRA) in red
 Spruce foliage.  Because the induction of NRA is a step in the process leading to the
formation of organic nitrogen compounds (amino acids), the nitrate from nitric acid could
function as an alternative source of nitrogen for plant growth. However, in plants under
       August 1991
                                        10-80
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     stress the reduction of nitrate to amino acids consumes energy needed for alternative
 2     metabolic processes; a potentially slight negative impact.
 3          The effects of ammonia, a reduced nitrogen gas, have been summarized by Van Der
 4     Eerden (1982), however, ammonia concentrations seldom reach phytotoxic levels in the
 5     'United States, consequently it will not be extensively discussed here (U,S. Environmental
 6     Protection Agency, 1982).  In contrast, high ammonia concentrations in Europe have been
 7     observed (van Dijk and Roelofs, 1988). Van Der Eerden (1982) summarized available
 8     information on the response of crop and tree species to ammonia fumigation and concluded
 9     that the following concentrations produced no adverse effects:
10          0.107 ppmv (75/zg m~3), yearly average
11          0.858 ppmv (600/ig m"3), daily average
12           14.3 ppmv (10,000 /ig m"3) hourly average.
13
14          Submicron, ammonium sulfate aerosols have been shown to affect foliage of Phaseolus
15     vulgaris L. (Gmur et al., 1983). At a concentration of 26 mg m"3 (37 ppmv),  three weeks of
16     exposures produced leaf chlorosis, necrosis and loss of turgor.  Gmur et al. (1983) reported
17     that these foliar  symptoms were not correlated with changes in shoot or root dry mass, and,
18     suggested that no relationship to plant growth was expected. However, the 3-week
19     experiment was  not long enough for significant changes in dry matter to be observed.  The
20     level of ammonia producing'the leaf effects (37 ppmv) exceeds normal ambient levels for the
21     U.S., but it is representative of reported high concentration episodes in Europe (Gmur et al,,
22     1983).  Cowling and Lockyer (1981) reported beneficial effects of ammonia on the growth of
23     Lolium perenne  L. due to sorption of NH3 .nitrogen through leaves. Van Hove et al. (1989b)
24     studied the effects of 50 and 100 /ig m"3 NH3 on Populus euramericana L. over a 6 to
25     8-week period and found increases in photosynthesis at 100 /ig m"3, but no 'changes in
26     stomatal characteristics up to  that  level of NH3.
27                 .                         ,                      ......
28     10.4.2  Indirect Effects
29           Indirect effects of dry nitrogen  deposition to terrestrial ecosystems result from the
30     addition of mtrogen to ecosystems at a rate above that experienced during normal successional
31     processes leading to ecosystem eutrophication.  Positive responses to added nitrogen would be
32     anticipated in many cases because many natural systems are nitrogen limited (Krause,  1988;
        August 1991
10-81      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 National Research Council, 1979; see also Sections 10.3 and 10.5).  However, if atmospheric
 additions of nitrogen exceed the "buffering" capacity of an ecosystem, alterations in soil
 chemistry are expected to take place (see Section 10.3).  Inputs of nitrogen to natural systems
 are hypothesized to alleviate deficiencies and allow increased growth of some plants, but in
 doing so may also impact interplant competitive relationships which would result in altered
 species composition and diversity 'in sensitive ecosystems (U.S. Environmental Protection
 Agency, 1982; Ellenberg,  1987).  Schulze (1989) has also proposed that excessive additions
 of nitrogen lead to nutrient deficiencies of other,elements,(Ca, Mg).  Aber et al. (1989)
 outlined a hypothetical progression of the effects of excessive nitrogen additions for northern
 forest ecosystems, and concluded that these systems have a limited capacity to accumulate
 nitrogen.
      In addition to the potential for increasing plant productivity through fertilization, the
 deposition of nitrogen from the atmosphere to ecosystems has been hypothesized to disrupt
 normal nutrient cycles and physiological processes, resulting in increased susceptibility of
 forests to other environmental stresses (Lindberg et al.,  1987; Nihlgard,  1985; McLaughlin,
 1985; Schulze, 1989). Physiological  imbalances resulting from excessive nitrogen additions
 are also hypothesized to disrupt the winter hardening process (Nihlg&rd, 1985; Friedland   ,
 etal., 1984; Waring, 1987), produce nutrient imbalances (Nihlgard,  1985; Waring, 1987;
 Schulze, 1989), and altered carbon allocation patterns within plants (Nihlgard, 1985;
 McLaughlin, 1985).   Altered shoot:root ratios resulting from different patterns of carbon
 allocation can lead to increased susceptibility to drought because shoots grow^at the expense
 of roots under high nitrogen availability (Freer-Smith, 1988; Norby et al., 1989;
McLaughlin, 1985; Waring, 1987). Changes in carbon:nitrogen ratios of tissues resulting
from  an excessive supply of nitrogen can also result in altered host-pathogen, mycorrhizal,
and pest-plant interactions (Grennfelt and Hultberg,  1986; Nihlgard, 1985).  In addition to
these  indirect soil-mediated effects on individual plants, Ellenberg (1987) has suggested that
current balances of interspecific competition in some sensitive ecosystems might be altered by
additional sources  of nitrogen and result in the displacement of existing species by plants that
can utilize the excess nitrogen more efficiently.  For example, Roelofs et al.  (1987) proposed
that ammonia/ammonium deposition leads to heathland changes  via two modes
(1) acidification of the soil and associated  loss of cations such as K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+
        August 1991
                                         10-82
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      (2) nitrogen enrichment leading to "abnormal" plant growth rates and altered competitive
 2      relationships.
3           Although much has been hypothesized about the impact of excessive inputs of nitrogen
 4      into forest ecosystems, direct experimental information to prove or disprove these hypotheses
 5      is not widely available.  Margolis and Waring (1986) showed that fertilization of Douglas fir
 6      with nitrogen could lengthen the growing season to the point where frost damage became a
 7     .problem.  However, Klein and Perkins (1987) presented other evidence which showed no
 8      additional winter injury of high elevation conifer forests when fertilized with 40 kg total
 9      nitrogen ha'1 yr"1.  Van Dijk et al.  (1990) conducted a greenhouse study to determine the
10     impact of ammonium in rainwater on three coniferous trees (Douglas fir,  Gorsican pine, and
11      Scots pine)  and found no sign of deterioration in seedlings receiving nitrogen at the rate of
12     48 kg ha"1 yr'1. At the very high rates of'application of 480, kg N ha'1 yr"1 increases in
13     shoot/root ratio, and reductions in fine root and mycorrhizal biomass were observed.
14     However, this level of nitrogen addition (i.e., simulated deposition) is approximately one
15     order of magnitude greater than most rates of deposition in North America or Europe.  Kenk
16     and Fischer (1988) summarized fertilization experiments on German forests and found little
17     evidence for negative effects, but some indication of increased growth since 1960 that could
18     be the result of atmospheric N deposition was indicated for Norway spruce.  Miller and
 19     Miller (1988) concluded that fertilizer trials are not be appropriate for extrapolation as
20     indicators of forest response to N deposition (i.e., the timing of applications is typically quite
21     different), but nevertheless  they also suggested that results of such trials ought to be
 22     reconcilable with the "natural" phenomenon.
 23           De Temmerman et al. (1-988) provided data showing increased fungal outbreaks and
 24      frost damage on several pines species exposed  to very high ammonia deposition rates
 25      (> 350 kg  ha"1  yr"1). Numbers of species and fruiting bodies 'of fungi have also increased
 26     concomitantly with nitrogen deposition in Dutch forests (van Breemen and van Dijk, 1988).
 27     An increase in total amino  acid concentrations  in needles known to take place in response to
 28     dry deposition of NOX (Section 10.2), has also been suggested to favor outbreaks of insect
 29     pests (Waring and Pitman,  1985; White,  1984).  Schulze (1989) presents a clear progression
 30     of evidence which indicates that canopy uptake of nitrogen together with root uptake has
 31     caused a nitrogen imbalance in Norway spruce leading to forest decline.
         August 1991
10-83
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1          Excessive nitrogen inputs to terrestrial ecosystems can cause differential competitive
  2     advantage among plants within a heathland (Heil and Bruggink, 1987; Heil et al., 1988).
  3     The authors established that the changing nature of unmanaged heathlands in the Netherlands,
  4     where Calluna vulagris is being replaced by grass species, is a result of the eutrophic effect
  5     of acidic rainfall and large nitrogen inputs arising from intensive farming practices in the
  6     region.  Both Calluna vulagris and Molinia caerulea are stress tolerant species (Grime, 197
-------
 1      in response to added N or (3) added N leads to increased losses of nitrate in streamwater, and
 2      concluded that the third was most reasonable (see also Section 10.3).  Brown et al. (1988)
 3      reported that a recent workshop concluded that N saturation could be best defined as
 4      occurring when N outputs from ecosystems exceeded inputs.  This conclusion was based on a
 5      model of plant/soil N saturation put forth by Agren and Bosatta (1988).  Aber et al. (1989)
 6      similarly define nitrogen  saturation as the availability of ammonium and nitrate in excess of
 7      total combined plant and microbial nutritional  demands.  The concept of N saturation leads to
 8      the possibility of defining a critical N load (deposition rate) at which no change or deleterious
 9      impacts will occur to an  ecosystem (Nilsson, 1986). It is important to recognize that the
10     magnitude of such a "critical load" will be site and species specific being highly dependent on
11      initial soil chemistries and biological growth potentials (i.e., nitrogen demands).
12
13     10.4.3.1  Critical N Loads That Have Been  Proposed
14           Skeffmgton and Wilson (1988) summarized and discussed the following possible criteria
15     as potentially useful for defining appropriate critical N loads  on ecosystems:
16           •      Prevent nitrate levels in drinking or surface waters from rising above
17                 standard levels
18           •      Ensure proton production less than weathering rate
19           •      Maintenance of a fixed ammonia-base cation balance
20           •      Maintenance N inputs below N outputs (the  N saturation approach)
21           •      Minimize accelerations in the rates of ecological  succession (vegetation changes
22                 due to altered interspecific competition).
23
24           De Vries (1988) has also defined criteria for a combined critical load for nitrogen and
25      sulfur for Dutch forest ecosystems based on the following: N contents  of foliage, nitrate
26      concentrations in groundwater, NH4/K ratios, Ca/Al ratios, and Al concentrations in soil
27      solution.  Based on these criteria, De Vries concluded that current rates of N and
 28      S deposition in  the Netherlands exceed acceptable levels.
 29           Schulze et al.  (1989) have also  proposed critical loads for N deposition based on an
 30      ecosystem total anion and cation balance.  This approach makes the assumption that processes
 31      determining ecosystem stability are related to soil acidification and nitrate leaching (see also
 32      Section 10.3.6).  They concluded that in order to limit the mobilization of aluminum and
 33      other heavy metals  resulting from acidification and nitrate leaching (a negative result), critical
 34     nitrogen deposition rates could not exceed 3-14 kg N ha'1 yr'1 for silicate soils or 3 to 48 kg
        August 1991                             10-85      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
 N ha"1 yr"1 for calcareous based soils.  Other critical loads have been proposed at rates of
 nitrogen deposition ranging from as little as 1 to levels near 100 Kg N ha"1 yr"1 depending on
 the impacts considered acceptable and the criteria used to define the critical load.
      Critical loads less than 30 kg  ha"1 yr"1 have been proposed based on criteria to minimize
 species changes (van Breeman and van Dijk, 1988; Liljelund and Torstensson, 1988).  Using
 the criteria that ecosystem nitrogen inputs should not exceed outputs, critical loads have been'"'
 proposed as low as 1-5 kg N ha"1 yr"1 for poorly productive sites with low productivity or in
 the range from 5-30 kg N ha"1 yr"1 for  sites having medium quality soils and for common
 forested systems (Boxman et al.,  1988;  Rosen,  1988; Skeffington and Wilson, 1988; World
 Health Organization, 1987).
      In their summary of a recent conference on critical nitrogen loading, after discussing
 various options for setting a critical N load Skeffington and Wilson (1988) concluded that
 "we do not understand ecosystems well  enough  to set a critical load for N deposition in a
 completely objective fashion".  Brown et al. (1988) further concluded that there was probably
 no universal  critical load definition  that  could be applied to all ecosystems, and a combination
 of scientific,  political,  and economic considerations would be required for the application of
 the critical load concept.
      The following terrestrial ecosystems have been suggested as being at risk'from the
 deposition of nitrogen-based compounds:
      •    heathlands with a high proportion of lichen cover,
      •    low meadow vegetation types used for extensive grazing and  ..
           haymaking, and
      •    coniferous forests, especially those at high altitudes (World Health
           Organization, 1987).
      These oligotrophic ecosystems are  considered at risk from atmospheric nitrogen inputs
because plant species normally restricted by low nutrient concentrations could gain a
competitive advantage, and their growth at the expense of existing species would change the
 "normal" species composition and displace some species entirely (Ellenberg, 1987; Waring,
 1987). Sensitive natural ecosystems, unlike highly manipulated agricultural systems, may be
prone to damage from exposure to dry deposited nitrogen compounds because processes of
natural selection whereby tolerant individuals survive may not be keeping pace with the
current levels of atmospheric N deposition (World Health Organization, 1987).
       August 1991
                                         10-86
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     10.4.3.2 Current Rates of Total N Deposition
 2          Application of the concept of critical N loading has not yet been widely adopted in
 3     North America (based on amount of published data), but a comparison of total N deposition
 4     data for North America and proposed critical loads just discussed should provide a reasonable
 5     comparison of the status of terrestrial systems with respect to changes expected from elevated
 6  ..... levels of nitrogen deposition. Tables 10-14, 10-15,  and 10-16 summarize information
 7 =    regarding the total deposition of nitrogen to a variety of ecosystems/forest types in North
 8     America.  Table 10-14 summarizes information regarding the total deposition of nitrogen to a
 9     variety of ecosystems/forest types or regional areas in North America and Europe.
10          Nitrogen deposition can be divided into the four categories depending on its  origin:
11    -. cloudwater, precipitation, dry particles, and gaseous forms. Table 10-15 summarizes wet
12     deposited nitrate and ammonium deposition data for various states that were part of the
13     National Acid Deposition Program.   Table 10-16 specifically addresses the  issue of
14     relationships between ecosystems nitrogen inputs and outputs.  Data in these tables indicates
15     that total deposition of nitrogen in North America is typically less than rates found for many
16     areas in Europe.  North American sites would appear to have total N deposition rates less
17     than 25 kg N ha"1 yr"1. It is also obvious from these summary tables that much of our
18     information on nitrogen deposition is limited to information on nitrate and ammonium
19     deposition  in rainfall.  Lindberg et al. (1987) concluded that the lack of data on multiple
20     forms of nitrogen deposition limits our ability to accurately determine current levels of
21     nitrogen loading.
22           Olsen (1989) summarized nitrate and ammonium concentration and wet deposition data
23     for the United States and southern Canada for the period from  1979  through 1986.  For
24      1986, the greatest annual rates of ammonium and nitrate deposition were localized in the
25     northeastern United Sates and southern Canada (Olsen, 1989).  Peak values were  5 and
26     25 kg ha"1 yr"1 for ammonium and nitrate, respectively.  Similar wet deposition data for 1987
27      showed peak deposition rates of 3.5  and-16 kg ha"1 yr"1 for ammonium and nitrate,
28      respectively (National Atmospheric Deposition Program, 1988).  Zemba et al. (1988)
29      summarized wet nitrate deposition data from 77 stations located in Eastern  North  America
30     and found that peak nitrate deposition (>20 kg ha"1 yr"1) occurred between lakes Michigan
31      and Ontario.  They also found the temporal pattern of nitrate deposition was quite even
        August 1991
10-87
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
         TABLE 10-14. MEASUREMENTS OF VARIOUS FORMS OF
           ANNUAL N DEPOSITION TO NORTH AMERICAN AND
                     EUROPEAN ECOSYSTEMS
Forms of N deposition (Kg ha'1)
Site Location/
Vegetation
United States
CA, Chaparral
CA, Sierra Nevada
GA, Loblolly pine
NC, Loblolly pine
NC, Hardwoods
NC, White pine
NC, Red spruce
NH, Deciduous
NH, Deciduous
NY, Red spruce
NY, Mixed deciduous
TN, Mixed deciduous
TN, Oak forest #1
TN, Oak forest #2
TN, Oak forest #1
TN, Oak forest #2
TN, Oak forest
TN, Loblolly pine
WA, Douglas fir
WA, Douglas fir
U.S. Regions
Adirondacks
Midwest
Northeast
Northwest
Southeast
S.E. Appalachians
Canada
Alberta (southern)
British Columbia
Ontario
Ontario (southern)
Wet
Cloud Rain

8.2
._
3.7
8.7
4.8
3.7
8.7 6.2
7
9.3
7.3 6.1
4.8
2.9
3.2
2.9
' - 6.9
6.0
4.5
4.3
2.9
j

6.3
- : 4.2
- 21.7
~ 16.6
- 20.6
- : 4.2

7.3
5.5
3.7
2.3
Dry
Particles

—
—
1.0
2.2
0.5
0.9
3.6
—
—
0.2
0.8
4.1
4.4
4.4
1.3
1.2
1.8
0.6
1.3
—

4.7
2.9
—
—
—
3.1

12.2C
—
—
1.4
Gases

—
—
4.2
4.1
—
2.7
8.6
—
—
2.3
2.5
6.1
4.0
4.0
—
—
3.8
1.4
0.6
—

—
—
—
—
—
—

—
—
—
—
Total

23b
(2)°
9
15
5.3
7
27
(7)
(9)
16
8
13
12
11
8
7
10
9
5
(1)

11
7.r-
22
17
21
7.3

19.5
(5)
(4)
3.7
Reference

Riggan et al. (1985)
Williams and Melack (in press)
Lovett (1991)
Lovett (1991)
Swank and Waide (1988)
Lovett (1991)
Lovett (1991)
Likens et al. (1970)
Likens (1985)
Lovett (1991)
Lovett (1991)
Kelly and Meagher (1986)
Kelly and Meagher (1986)
Kelly and Meagher (1986)
Kelly (1988)
Kelly (1988)
Lindberg et al. (1986)
Lovett (1991)
Lovett (1991)
Henderson and Harris (1975)

Driscoll et al. (1989a)
Driscoll et al. (1989a)
Munger and Eisenreich (1983)
Munger and Eisenreich (1983)
Munger and Eisenreich (1983)
Driscoll et al. (1989a)

Peake and Davidson (1990)
Feller (1987)
Linsey et al. (1987)
Ro et al. (1988)
August 1991
10-88
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
              TABLE 10-14 (cont'd). MEASUREMENTS OF VARIOUS FORMS OF
                     ANNUAL N DEPOSITION TO NORTH AMERICAN AND
                                    EUROPEAN ECOSYSTEMS
                             Forms of N deposition (Kg ha"1)
      Site Location/
      Vegetation
   Wet
            Dry
Cloud  Rain    Particles Gases  Total  Reference
      Fed. Rep. Germany
        Spruce (SE slope)
        Spruce (SW slope)

      Netherlands
        Oak-birch

        Deciduous/spruce

        Scots pine

        Douglas fir

        Douglas fir

      Norway  - ,-
        Spruce

      United Kingdom
        Spruce Forest
        Cotton grass moor
       16.5
       24.3
  1.9
  0.4
       19.3
       10.3
8.0
8.0
         95.7=
          0.7
na
na
         0.2
13.5
 4.0
                       16.5  Hantschel et al. (1990)
                       24.3  Hantschel et al. (1990)
             24-56b van Breemen and van Dijk
                    (1988)
             21-42b van Breemen and van Dijk
                    (1988)
             17-64b van Breemen and van Dijk
                    (1988)
             l7-64b van Breemen and van Dijk
                    (1988)
               115   Draaijers et al. (1989)
11.2  Lovett(1991)
3-19b  Royal Society (1983)

23.4  Fowler et al. (1989)
12.4  Fowler et al. (1989)
      *— Symbolizes data not available or in the case of cloud deposition not present.
      "Total nitrogen deposition was based on bulk deposition and throughfall measurements and does include
       components of wet and dry deposition.
      "Measurements of total deposition data that do not include both a wet and dry estimate probably,underestimate
       total nitrogen deposition and are enclosed in parentheses.
      dlncludes deposition from gaseous forms.
1      throughout the year (Schwartz, 1989).  Wet deposition of ammonium (NH4+) in Europe
2      ranges between 3.5 and 17.3 kg NH4+ ha"1 yr"1 (Buijsman and Erisman, 1987; Heil et al.,
3      1987).  Boring et al. (1988) have also published an extensive review of the sources, fates and
4      impacts of nitrogen inputs to terrestrial ecosystems.
5           For an oak-hickory  forest in eastern Tennessee, dry deposition made up greater than
6      80% of the total atmospheric deposition of nitrogen ions (Lindberg et al.,  1986).  Barrie and
       August 1991
                   10-89
                      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
       TABLE 10-15. MEAN ANNUAL WET NITRATE AND AMMONIUM
        DEPOSITION TO VARIOUS STATES LOCATED THROUGHOUT
                       THE UNITED STATES*
Forms of N deposition (Kg ha"1)
Location
Pennsylvania
New York
Ohio
Georgia
Tennessee
Illinois
N. Carolina
Arkansas
Virginia
Florida
Oklahoma
Colorado
Alabama
New Mexico
S. Dakota
Texas
No. of Sites Nitrate
3 10.9
5 9.7
2 7.6
1 6.9
1 6.9
4 6.2
4 6.2
1 5.0
1 5.3
2 4.9
3 4.1
4 4.3
1 3.7
4 3.6
1 2.7
3 3.1
Ammonium Total*
1.3 12.2
1.4 11.1
1.7 9.3
1.1 8.0
0.8 7.7
1.3 7.5
1.1 7.3
1.3 6.3
0.5 5,8
0.6 5.5
1.3 5.4
0.6 4.9
0.6 4.3 ,
0.5 ,4.1
1.3 4.0
0.6 3.7
Reference11
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
(1988)
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
(1988)
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
(1988)
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
(1988)
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
(1988)
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
(1988)
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
(1988)
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
(1988)
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
(1988)
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
(1988)
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
(1988)
Bohm (1991)
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
(1988)
Bohm (1991)
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
(1988)
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
(1988)
August 1991
10-90    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
         TABLE 10-15 (cont'd). MEAN ANNUAL WET NITRATE AND AMMONIUM
               DEPOSITION TO VARIOUS STATES LOCATED THROUGHOUT
                                    THE UNITED STATES*
Location
California
Washington
Wyoming
Arizona
Utah
Idaho
Oregon
Montana
Arizona
Hawaii
Forms
No. of Sites
5
3
3
1
1
1
4
4
1
1
of N deposition (Kg ha'1)
Nitrate
2.9
2.7
2.5
2.6
2.5
2.3
2.1
1.9
1.0
0.08
Ammonium
0.6
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.01
i
Total2
3.5
3.0
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.3
1.2
0.1
Reference15
Bohm (1991)
Bohm (1991)
Bohm (1991)
Bohm (1991)
Bohm (1991)
Bohm (1991)
Bohm (1991)
Bohm (1991)
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
(1988)
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
(1988)
      The states are presented in order of the greatest annual N deposition.
      Total deposition data is for wet deposited forms only and as such represents an underestimate of the total
       nitrogen loading received by these geographic areas.
      bData from National Atmospheric Deposition Program (1988) are for a single year, and data summarized by
       Bohm (1991) are for the period from 1985 through 1988.
1     Sirois (1986) estimated that dry deposition contributed 21 to 30% of total NO3" deposition in
2     eastern Canada. Lovett and Lindberg (1986) also concluded that dry deposition of nitrate is
3     the largest form of inorganic nitrogen deposited to oak-hickory forests in eastern Tennessee.
4     Significant nitrogen inputs from the deposition of nitrogen dioxide have been predicted
5     (Hanson et al., 1989; Hill, 1971; Kelly and Meagher, 1986).  Duyzer et al. (1987) has also
6     predicted that dry  deposition of ammonia can reach levels as high as 54 kg ha"1 yr"1 in areas
7     of high ambient concentration (0.017 ppmv).  Typical values of ammonia deposition in
       August 1991
10-91
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
         TABLE 10-16.
NITROGEN INPUT/OUTPUT RELATIONSHIPS
 FOR SEVERAL ECOSYSTEMS
Site/Vegetation
United States
FL, slash pine
GA, Loblolly pine
ME, spruce
NC, Loblolly pine
NC, Oak-Hickory
NC, Red spruce
NC, White pine
NC, White pine
NH, N. Hardwood
NH, N. Hardwood
NY, Deciduous
NY, Red spruce
OR, Douglas fir
TN, Loblolly pine
TN, Hardwood
TN, Hardwood
TN, Hardwood
TN, Oak forest
TN, Oak forest
TN, Shortleaf/pine
TN, Yellow/poplar
WA, Douglas fir
WA, Douglas fir
WA, Red alder
WA, Silver fir
WI, N.hardwoods
Canada
Ontario (maple)
Fed. Rep. Germany
Norway spruce
Beech
Netherlands
Oak
Oak-Birch
Oak
Mixed deciduous
Inputs

5.9b
9b
7.5b
15b
8.2°
27. lb
8.8C
7.4"
6.5
23.6
8b
15.9b
2.0
8.7b
13. 2b
13.0
8.7
7-8d
11. 5b
8.7
7.7
1.7
4.7b
70b
1.3
5.6

7.8

21.8
21.8

45.
54
56
63
Efflux"

0
0
0
0
3.2
11-20
0.2
0
4.0
17.4
1
3
1.5
0-2
4.4
3.1
1.8
1.25
3.2
1.8
3.5
0.6
0
71
2.7
0.05

18.2

14.9
4.4

22
78 ,
28
68
Reference

Van Miegroet et al. (1991)
Van Miegroet et al. (1991)
Van Miegroet et al. (1991)
Van Miegroet et al. (1991)
Cole and Rapp (1981)
Van Miegroet et al. (1991)
Cole and Rapp (1981)
Van Miegroet et al. (1991)
Bormann et al. (1977)
Likens et al. (1977)
Van Miegroet et al. (1991)
Van Miegroet et al. (1991)
Sollins et al. (1980)
Van Miegroet et al. (1991)
Kelly and Meagher (1986)
Henderson and Harris (1975)
Cole and Rapp (1981)
Kelly (1988)
Kelly and Meagher (1986)
Cole and Rapp (1981)
Cole and Rapp (1981)
Cole and Rapp (1981)
Van Miegroet et al. (1991)
Van Miegroet and Cole (1984)
Turner and Singer (1976)
Pastor and Bockheim (1984)

Foster and Nicolson (1988)

Cole and Rapp (1981)
Cole and Rapp (1981)

van Breemen et al. (1987)
van Breemen et al. (1987)
van Breemen et al. (1987)
van Breemen et al. (1987)
August 1991
          10-92
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
              TABLE 10-16 (cont'd).  NITROGEN INPUT/OUTPUT RELATIONSHIPS
                                   FOR SEVERAL ECOSYSTEMS
Site/Vegetation
Norway
Spruce
Sweden
Coniferous
United Kingdom
Mixed hardwood
U.S.S.R.
Norway spruce
Inputs

11.2b

2.1

5.8

1.1
Efflux"

0

0.6-1

12.6

0.9
Reference

. . , , ...

Van Miegroet et al. (1991)

Rosen (1982)

Cole and Rapp

Cole and Rapp



(1981)

(1981)
       "An estimate based on nitrogen losses from the soil profile or from streamflow out of a watershed.
       blncludes precipitation, cloud (where appropriate), participate and gaseous forms of nitrogen deposition.
       "Includes nitrogen inputs from precipitation and particulate forms of deposition.
       dMean of two oak forests in east Tennessee.
 1     central Europe and Scandinavia range between 20 and 40 kg ha"1 yr"1 (Grennfelt and
 2     Hultberg, 1986).
 3           Based on the current rates of N deposition (loading) occuring in North America
 4     (Tables 10-14 through 10-16) and the proposed critical N outlined in previous sections
 5     (Sections 10.3.6 and 10.4.3.1) one might conclude that current rates of N deposition in North
 6     America are sufficient to induce minor changes in some ecosystems (i.e.,' rates of deposition
 7     in N. America exceed some of the proposed critical load levels).  However, because
 8     ecosystems have a variable capacity to buffer changes caused by elevated inputs of nitrogen,
 9     it is difficult to make general conclusions about the type and extent of change currently
10     resulting from N deposition in North America.  Furthermore, current estimates of total '
11     nitrogen deposition to ecosystems and regions of the United States  (Tables 10-14 through
12      10-16) usually do not account for gaseous nitrogen losses from ecosystems (e.g., N2O and
13     NH3), therefore the estimates of total nitrogen deposition may be overestimated (Wetselaar
14     and Farquhar,, 1980; Bowden, 1986; Anderson and Levine, 1987; Schimel et al., 1988).
15     Melillo et al. (1989) indicate that losses of nitrogen from ecosystems in the form of N2O are
16     likely to be in the range of 2-4  kg N ha"1 yr"1. Higher levels of atmospheric nitrogen
17     deposition are also expected to lead to increased rates of N2O emissions.
18
        August 1991
10-93
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
10.5  ECOSYSTEM EFFECTS-WETLANDS AND BOGS
10.5.1  Introduction
     The diverse ecosystems that make up the biosphere interact through the cycling of
essential elements and compounds.  The availability of these essential elements determines the
rates of biological processes within a given ecosystem.  For example, the availability of
nitrogen in the form of NO3" (nitrate) or NH4+ (ammonium), which cycles through an
enormous atmospheric pool of N2, is an important determinant of the productivity of
ecosystems. Ecosystems interact and function in different ways with complex feedback
mechanisms; they influence the cycles of essential elements and, to some extent, even the
earth's climate.
     Wetlands fulfill an important role in  these global cycles as net sources and sinks for
biogenic gases.  They transfer to the atmosphere globally significant quantities of CH4
(methane) (Harriss et al., 1982,  1985) and reduced sulfur gases (Steudler and Peterson,
1984).  Elkins et al. (1978) discuss the possibility that coastal marshes may function as net
sinks for N2O (nitrous oxide). Because of the anaerobic nature of their waterlogged soils,
decomposition of organic matter in wetland soils is incomplete. Consequently, wetlands
function as sinks and long-term storage reservoirs for organic carbon. It has been estimated
that wetlands once sequestered a net of 57 to 83  X 106  metric tons of carbon per year
worldwide, although recent widespread drainage of wetland soils has shifted the carbon
balance (Armentano and Menges, 1986).  Although this rate of carbon uptake is small in
comparison to other global carbon fluxes,  such as the annual release of carbon from
combustion of fossil fuel (5-6 x 109 metric tons/y, Rotty, 1983) or the net uptake of CO2-C
by the ocean (1.6 X 109 metric tons/y, Tans et al.,  1990), it is important when the net
balance between large fluxes is considered and it is certainly important over geologic time
scales (Armentano and Menges,  1986).
     These gases (CH4, N2O and reduced sulfur compounds) modify atmospheric chemistry
and global climate. The destruction of ozone in the upper atmosphere by its reaction with
N2O is one example.  Combustion sources are currently raising the atmospheric concentration
of N2O (Hao et al., 1987).  The rise in anthropogenic releases of nitrogen oxides to the
atmosphere also increases the deposition of biologically available forms of nitrogen onto the ,
       August 1991
                                        10-94
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     landscape with potential effects on productivity (or other aspects of function) and community
 2     structure.
 3           Locally, wetlands function as:
 4        „    habitats for wildlife,
 5             flood control systems,
 6             stabilizers and sinks for sediments,
 7             storage reservoirs for water, and
 8             biological filters that maintain water quality.
 9     Studies of riparian forests, for example, generally indicate that they exert a positive influence
10     on the water quality of receiving streams by intercepting and removing nutrients from runoff
11     (Yates and Sheridan, 1983; Brinson et al., 1984; Peterjohn and Correll, 1984; Quails, 1984).
12     And as sediment traps, salt marshes like those on the Louisiana coast can accumulate annually
13     an impressive 0.76 cm of sediment (DeLaune et al., 1983).  These functions are a great
14     monetary value to society (Westman,  1977).
15           Wetlands also harbor a disproportionate (relative to habitat area) share of flora that are
16     threatened by extinction.  Of the 130 plant species from the conterminous United States that
17     are formally listed as endangered or threatened (Code of Federal Regulations, 1987),
18      18 species (14%) occur principally in wetland habitats.  On the national list of plant species
19     that are identified as endangered (Status LE or PE), threatened (Status LT or PT),  or
20     potentially threatened (Status 1 or 2),  1776 species are listed for the conterminous United
21     States (Federal Register,  1985), and 302 of these (17%) occur principally in wetland habitats.
22     The national list of plant  species that occur in wetlands includes 6,728 entries (Reed, 1988),
23     and since this list includes plant species found primarily in upland habitats as well as plants
24     from the entire United States and its territories, we can estimate conservatively  that the
25     endangered, or potentially threatened wetland plant species represent an alarming 4.5%
26      (302/6,728) of this total.
27           Wetland  plants are undoubtedly threatened because of loss of habitat,  which in the
28      United States has been largely a consequence of agricultural development involving drainage
29      (Tiner, 1984).  Total wetland area including intertidal and palustrine areas in the
30      conterminous United States (Figure 10-17) totaled 437,609 km2 during the mid-1950s and
31      decreased to 400,567 km2, or 5.1% of total land area, by the mid-1970s (Prayer et al.,
                                      „                   ..                  i •
32      1983). The net loss of wetland habitats during these two decades is equivalent  to an annual
33      rate of loss of 1,852 km2/yr (=715 sq. miles per year).  However, it can  also be concluded
        August 1991
10-95
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
that current rates of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in parts of Europe, elevated by
anthropogenic emissions, alter the competitive relationships among plants and threaten
wetland species adapted to infertile habitats.  Those data are reviewed here, and on this basis
we can anticipate similar effects of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in the United States.
      Figure 10-17.  Map of the United States showing location of the major groups of inland
                     freshwater marshes (from Hofstetter, 1983, p. 213).  Contours delineate
                     physiographic regions.
1     10.5.2  Atmospheric Nitrogen Inputs
2          Atmospheric nitrogen inputs occur as both wet and dry deposition. Most studies of
3     atmospheric nitrogen inputs into wetlands focus only on wet deposition or bulk deposition.
4     Accurate measurements of wet deposition are carried out by analyzing nitrogen in
5     precipitation immediately following a precipitation event.  Frequently, however, rainfall is
6     accumulated over some period of time before it is analyzed, and the resulting measurement of
7     deposition rate is usually referred to as bulk deposition. Bulk deposition rates combine wet
8     deposition with some component of dry deposition.   Where dry deposition has been carefully
      August 1991
                                        10-96
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
measured, it has been concluded that (1) the relative importance of wet and dry deposition
varies geographically, (2) that dry deposition can exceed wet deposition (Boring et al., 1988),
and (3) that bulk precipitation samplers underestimate the combined dry plus wet deposition
rate (Dillon et al., 1988).  The available wet surface area of vegetation, onto which nitrogen
gases will diffuse, significantly affects the dry deposition rate (Heil et al.,  1987).  Levy and
Moxim (1987) modelled the fate of nitrogen oxide emissions to the atmosphere and concluded
that dry deposition accounts for greater than one-half of the total nitrogen oxide deposition  in
North America.
     The rate of bulk NO3" deposition has been shown to be positively correlated with the
concentration of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in air.  Press et al. (1986) measured atmospheric
concentrations of NQ2 and bulk deposition of NO3" at several sites in northern Britain for
18 months.  NO2 concentrations (2 week averages) ranged from near zero  to 25 Mg/m3 and
were correlated significantly (p< 0.001) with concentrations of NO3", collected in bulk
'samplers, that varied from near zero  to about 3 mg N/litre.-
     A third, and :rarely measured, mechanism of deposition that is locally important is the
interception or capture of fog or cloud droplets by vegetation.  Lovett et al. (1982) estimated
that the cloud deposition of NO3" in an alpine habitat in New  Hampshire was  101.5 kg
N ha"1 yr"1 compared to a bulk deposition rate of 23.4  kg N ha"1 yr"1.  The same
phenomenon was observed by Woodin, and Lee (1987) who collected 1.45x as much water  as
"throughflow" (collected beneath vegetation) passing through experimental Sphagnum mats  in
the field  as from adjacent bulk deposition gauges. Their data also suggests that the deposition
of solutes by this mechanism is important, and that bulk precipitation samplers underestimate
total deposition.
     Table 10-17 summarizes several studies that report wet or bulk deposition rates of
nitrogen  in North American wetlands, '' From- the data presented it may be concluded that bulk
deposition rates of NH4+, NO3", and organic nitrogen vary geographically and their relative
importance varies.  In general, however, inputs of NO3", NH4+, and organic nitrogen are  all
of the same order of magnitude, and their combined rate of deposition varies from 5.5 to
12.1 kg N ha"1 yr"1.  Other studies, however, indicate that wet NO3" deposition alone
exceeds 15 kg N ha"1 yr"1 over most of the midwest, and 20 kg N ha"1 yr"1 in portions of the
northeast United States (Zemba et al., 1988).
        August 1991
                                         10-97
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
            TABLE 10-17. BULK DEPOSITION OF NITROGEN IN NORTH AMERICAN
                                    WETLANDS  (kg N ha"1 yr'1)
Site
Chesapeake Bay, riverine tidal
emergent marsh
Massachusetts, salt marsh
Massachusetts, basin bog
Minnesota, spruce bog
Minnesota, spruce bog
Iowa, prairie marsh
Florida, everglades
Manitoba, emergent marsh
Ontario, poor fen
NH4+
2.7

1.4
2.5
1.7
3.0
4.0
3.0
NR
NR
NO3-
4.3

2.3
5.0
1.7,
2.0
4.0
9.6
NR
3.1
Org-N
4.7

3.9
NR
3.8
0.5
NR
NR
NR
NR
Tot-N
11.7

7.6

7.3
5.5


6.6-12.08

Reference
Jordan et al. (1983)

Valiela and Teal (1979)
Hemond(1983)
Verry and Timmpns (1982)
Urban and Eisenreich (1988)
Davis et al. (1983)
Flora and Rosendahl (1982)
Kadlec (1986)
Bayley et al. (1987)
        NR — not reported.
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
     Rates of nitrogen deposition, and NH4+ deposition in particular, in areas of Western
Europe are greater than in North America. In areas of Britain, bulk deposition rates of
43 and 46 kg ha"1 yr"1 have been reported (Press and Lee, 1982; Ferguson et al., 1984).
The combination of NO3" and NH4+ deposition down-wind of Manchester and Liverpool is
reported to be 32 kg N ha"1 yr'1  (Lee et al., 1986). Nitrogen deposition in fens  near Utrecht
was 21 kg N ha"1 yr"1 of inorganic nitrogen and 3 to 5 kg N ha"1 yr"1 of organic nitrogen in
bulk precipitation and 18 kg N ha"1 yr"1 of inorganic nitrogen in dry deposition (Koerselman
et al., 1990). Roelofs (1983) reported that wet deposition alone of nitrogen in the
Netherlands averages 15 kg N ha"1 yr"1 and is as great as 20-60 kg N ha"1 yr"1 in areas of
intensive stockbreeding, 75-90%  of this being deposited as NH4+. In Europe, 81 % of total
NH3 emissions are from livestock wastes, with the greatest emission  densities concentrated in
The Netherlands and Belgium (Buijsman,  1987). Annual NH3 emissions from animal excreta
in The Netherlands are reported to be 230 kt yr"1 (Van der Molen et al., 1989) or about
60 kg ha"1 yr"1 country-wide.                                                   '
     The chemistry of surface runoff from watersheds is probably of greater significance to
most wetlands than the chemistry of direct deposition, but the nitrogen load of surface runoff
probably increases with nitrogen deposition and with the size of the catchment area.
Atmospheric deposition accounts  for a large fraction of the total nitrogen entering watersheds
(Robertson and Rosswall, 1986).  Atmospheric deposition apparently has become a major
       August 1991
                                        •10-98
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      source of NO3" to surface waters in North America, especially in the east and upper midwest
 2      (Smith et al., 1987a), and increases in total nitrogen concentration at stream monitoring
           I                   - '                             •.
 3      stations are strongly associated with high levels of atmospheric nitrate deposition (Smith
 4      et al., 1987b). However, the direct contribution made by atmospheric deposition to the
 5      nitrogen load in surface water is unknown. Measurements by Buell and Peters (1988) of
 6      -stream chemistry in Georgia indicated that 93 % of the precipitation inputs of NH4+ and
 7      NO3" were retained by the watershed.  A study by Correll (1981) of mass nutrient balances
 8      of a small watershed of the Rhode River estuary on the Chesapeake Bay showed that total wet
 9      nitrogen deposition to 88 ha of tidal marshes and mudflats was 740 kg N (8.4 kg/ha) in
10      13 months compared to total nitrogen in runoff from 2,050 ha of watershed of 10,000 kg N.
11      Only about 7% (740 kg/10,740 kg) of the nitrogen entering the wetland was from direct
12      deposition. However, in as much  as nitrogen deposition onto the watershed (8.4 kg/ha x
13      2,050 ha = 17,220 kg) exceeded, total runoff from the watershed to the wetland (10,000 kg),
       . - -f       • -                 '-•-'-            •- •
14      deposition could have contributed indirectly through runoff the majority of nitrogen entering
15      the wetland.  But the contributions of other nitrogen sources to runoff,  such as fixation,
16      fertilizer, and animal waste, were  not given.    .       ,
17                     '             t    ,    .           ,        ;
18      10.5.3  The Wetland Nitrogen Cycle
19           The feature of wetlands that  sets them apart from terrestrial ecosystems is the anaerobic
20      (oxygen-free) nature of their waterlogged soils which alters the relative importance of various
21      microbial transformations of inorganic and organic nitrogen compounds.  Generally, the
22   ;   absence of O2 retards the decomposition of organic matter (Tate, 1979; DeLaune et al.,
23      1981; van der Valk and Attiwill, 1983;  Godshalk and Wetzel,  1978; Clark and Gilmour,
24      1983).  Complex aromatic ring structures are more resistant to microbial attack under anoxic
25      conditions (Tate, 1979), leading to the formation and buildup of peat in wetland
26      environments. Anoxic soils also favor the rapid conversion of N03~ to N2Q (nitrous oxide)
27      or N2 (nitrogen gas).  This process is accomplished by bacteria and is referred to as
28   -   denitrification or dissimilatory nitrate reduction, and it results in quantitatively important
29      losses of nitrogen from wetland  ecosystems. Finally, the hydrology of wetlands favors
30   •   diffusive exchanges of nitrogen compounds to and from sediments and advective transport
31      (carried by water) of nitrogen compounds between ecosystems.   This often results in
        August 1991
10-99
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
movements of NH4+ from anoxic sediments to the oxidized surface sediment or water
column, where nitrification (the oxidation of NH4+ to NO3" by bacteria) can occur, and the
return movement of NO3" to the anoxic sediment layers where denitrification can occur. The
nitrogen cycle in wetlands has been reviewed recently by Reddy and Patrick (1984), Savant
and De Datta (1982), and Bowden (1987). Important steps in the nitrogen cycle are
summarized in Section  10.1.3.
     Table 10-18 the nitrogen budgets are presented of wetlands that exhibit a wide range of
nitrogen inputs.  The two bog sites (Table 10-18) are representative of wetlands that contain
plant species that are adapted to low levels of nitrogen.  They are examples of ombrotrophic
bogs, meaning that they receive nutrients exclusively from precipitation.  They  develop where
precipitation exceeds evapotranspiration and where there is some impediment to drainage of
the surplus water (Mitsch and Gosselink, 1986). Bogs are dominated by Sphagnum spp. and
may be sparsely  forested.  The Sphagnum builds a dense layer of peat, creating a surface that
contains no mineral sediment.  The peat in ombrotrophic bogs is raised above the elevation of
the surrounding land so that they receive neither runoff from uplands nor inputs from ground
water.  Peat forming bog ecosystems are widely distributed throughout the northern
hemisphere, but  they are most common in formerly glaciated  regions.  The distribution of
peafland area in  North America is shown in Figure 10-18.  The bog ecosystems represented
in Table 10-18 are located in Minnesota (Urban and Eisenreich, 1988) and Massachusetts
(Hemond, 1983).
     In bog ecosystems, the most important nitrogen inputs are from wet and dry deposition
(see  the line labelled precipitation in Table 10-18).  The total  input of nitrogen  in these
examples is about 10 kg N ha"1 yr"1, and atmospheric deposition accounts for most of this
(Urban and Eisenreich, 1988; Hemond, 1983).  Also note that the total nitrogen outputs from
the system are approximately 4 kg N ha"1 yr"1.  The outputs are accounted for by
denitrification (1 to 1.8 kg N ha"1 yr"1) and by export in runoff of dissolved inorganic
nitrogen (as NH4+) and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON). No export of particulate organic
nitrogen was reported; nitrogen accumulated in plant tissues is largely recycled  within the
bog.
     Bog  wetlands are  representative of one end of a continuum, but there are  also other
wetlands where atmospheric nitrogen deposition represents a significant fraction of the totaf
        August 1991
                                        10-100
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                 TABLE 10-18  NITROGEN BUDGETS OF SELECTED WETLANDS
                                             (kg N ha'1 yr'1)
Location and Wetland Type:
INPUTS:
Precipitation
Fixation
Surf. , ground or tidal water
Total
INTERNAL CYCLE:
Plant assimilation
Mineralization
OUTPUTS:
Denitrification
Ammonia volatilization
Surf, or subsurface DIN export
Surf, or subsurface ON export
Total
UK
Salt
Marsh1

NR
3.36
43.4*


225.4
194.9

3.78
NR
2.4®
43.0®

MA
Salt
Marsh2

7.9
68.0
668.0
743.9

214.0s
193. 0$

143.0
0.35
102.0
552.0
797.4
Dutch
Rech.
Fen3

43. 71
2.1
7.3
53.1

274.0f
244.0*

1.4
NR
2.1
45. 8§
49.3
Dutch
Disc.
Fen3

42.01
12.7
20.9
75.6

90.0t
79.0*

1.1
NR
6.7
80.4§
88.2
French
Heath4

8.1
1.3
0
9.4

82.0
74.0

NR
NR
3.0
3.0

MA
Bog5

7.5
3.36
0
1.09

38.0
26.0

1.0
Trace
2.0
1.0
4.0
MN
Bog6

8.6
0.5
0
0.91

66.0
50.0

1.8
NR
0
2.0
3.8
       DIN = Dissolved inorganic nitrogen.
       ON = Dissolved and particulate organic nitrogen.
       NR = Not Reported.
       'Abd. Aziz and Nedwell (1986a,b):  salt marsh dominated by Puccinellia maritima (a grass).
       2Valiela and Teal (1979): salt marsh dominated by Spartina alterniflora.
       3Koerselman et al. (1990): Dutch eutrophic recharge and mesotrophic discharge fens, respectively.
       4Roze (1988):  mesophilous heathland (shrub bog) dominated by Erica ciliaris (heath) and Ulex minor.
       5Urban and Eisenreich (1988):  ombrotrophic Sphagnum bog forested with black spruce (Picea mariand) and
        with an understory of shrubs and sedges.
       6Hemond (1983): ombrotrophic bog dominated by Sphagnum.
       Calculated from Morris et al. (1984) and Valiela et al. (1984).
       ^Represents the net exchange of NO3- (the major component) and small particulate organic nitrogen rather than
        an absolute rate.
       ®Represents the net exchange of DON (the  major component), NH4+, and large particulate organic nitrogen
        rather than an absolute rate.
       ^Includes bulk plus dry deposition of inorganic and organic nitrogen.
       tFrom Verhoeven et al. (1988), assuming a root:shoot quotient of 1.0.
       *From Verhoeven et al. (1988).
       §Includes primarily hay harvested by mowing.
1      input of inorganic nitrogen.  For example, wetfall contributed more than 95% of the NH4+
2      and NO3" entering the 1,000 km2 Shark River Slough, the major fresh water drainage of
3      Everglades National Park (Flora and Rosendahl, 1982). However, the importance of organic
4      nitrogen in the surface inflow  may be considerable, depending on how easily or rapidly it is
       August 1991
10-101
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                            O.S - 10%
                            P««tJ*nd Area
                                   PtttUnd
        Figure 10-18.  Distribution of North American peatlands (from Mitsch and Gosselink.
                       1986, p. 288).
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
 mineralized by the microbial community.  In this ecosystem, rainfall is about 84% of total
 water input, and one can generalize that the significance of atmospheric nitrogen deposition
 increases in wetlands as rainfall increases as a fraction of the total water budget.
      The French heathland or shrub bog (Table 10-18) is another example of a wetland with
 low nitrogen inputs and outputs, but with an intermediate rate of internal cycling. The
 moderate size of the internal nitrogen cycle depends on the accumulation of a large quantity
 of organic nitrogen in the soil humus (Roze, 1988). A fraction of this organic pool
 mineralizes each year and is assimilated by the plant community. Organic and inorganic
 nitrogen in the soil is about 91% of total nitrogen in this heathland ecosystem, with the
 remaining 9% being  contained within the plant biomass. A moderate rate of nitrogen
 mineralization in the soil is balanced by assimilation by the plant community,  and nitrogen is
 largely conserved within the ecosystem.
     In the Dutch fens (Table 10-18), the inputs and outputs of nitrogen are intermediate
between those of the bogs and salt marshes.  Both fens are influenced by their close
proximity to heavily  fertilized pastures, by atmospheric nitrogen deposition, and by annual
mowing and harvest of aboveground vegetation.  The fen that occupies a site of ground water
       August 1991
                                        10-102      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
recharge is influenced by water that is diverted from the highly polluted river Vecht during
periods of high evapotranspiration, and the discharge fen is influenced by nutrients in ground
water (Verhoeven et al.,  1988).  However, atmospheric nitrogen deposition in these fens
supplies more nitrogen than all other inputs combined (Table 10-18).
     The coastal salt marsh ecosystems in Table 10-18 are characteristic of wetlands that are
adapted to large nitrogen inputs. Coastal salt marshes have a temperate, worldwide
distribution.  They exist within the intertidal zone and are alternately flooded and drained
daily by the action of the tides. The example from Massachusetts is a salt marsh dominated
by the grass Spartina alterniflora (Valiela and Teal,  1979).  The salt marsh example from the
United Kingdom in Essex is dominated by the grass Puccinellia  maritima (Abd. Aziz and
Nedwell, 1986b).
     In salt marsh ecosystems, the most important nitrogen inputs are  from those brought
into the marsh in tidal water and, in some case's, ground water.  Input of pafticulate organic
nitrogen from sedimentation and/or NO3" is apparently the dominant mechanism by which
these ecosystems remove nitrogen from surface water, since the  diffusion gradients for NH4+
and DON normally favor diffusion out of the sediment.  These surface and ground water
sources of nitrogen are one to two  orders of magnitude greater than inputs from precipitation
(Table 10-18).  In the Massachusetts salt marsh, ground  water inputs of NO3" and DON are
important and account for 60 and 56 kg N ha"1 yr"1, respectively,  of the total inputs  (Valiela
and Teal, 1979). In contrast,  the Essex (UK) marsh is not influenced by ground water (Abd.
Aziz and Nedwell,  1986b).  Both salt marshes have large nitrogen inputs from tidal water,
and in the Massachusetts marsh these are largely as NH4+  (54 kg  N ha"1 yr"1), DON
(337 kg N ha"1 yr"1), and particulate organic nitrogen (139 kg N ha"1 yr"1) (Valiela and Teal,
1979). There are additional inputs and outputs, such as deposition of bird faeces and
shellfish harvest, but these are insignificant in comparison to other rates (Valiela and Teal,
1979).
     The large inputs of nitrogen in salt marshes are balanced by equally large outputs
(Table 10-18), but there are important transformations that take  place within the marsh.
Denitrification accounts for 17.9%  of the total nitrogen loss from the Massachusetts marsh.
Because the denitrification rate is greater than the combined inputs of NO3"' this implies that
rates of nitrification are large. In both marshes,  the greatest nitrogen losses occur in tidal
        August 1991
                                        10-103
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  S
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
water exchange, and in the Massachusetts marsh there is a net loss of all forms of dissolved
nitrogen in tidal water.  The Massachusetts marsh exports large amounts of NH4+ (73 kg
N ha"1 yr"1), NO3" (25 kg N ha"1 yr'1), DON (380 kg N ha"1 yr"1), and particulate organic
nitrogen (17 kg N ha"1 yr"1) (Valiela and Teal, 1979).
     Nitrogen inputs and outputs in tidal water were given as net exchanges of different
nitrogen components in the Essex (UK) study (Abd. Aziz and Nedwell, 1986b) rather than
absolute rates.  This is the reason for the discrepancy in the rates of tidal water imports and
exports of nitrogen in the Essex and Massachusetts marshes (Table 10-18). However, valid
comparisons can be made of the net exchanges.  There is a large net export of DON
(43 kg N ha"1 yr"1) from the Essex marsh (Abd. Aziz and Nedwell, 1986b), and this is
consistent with the net DON loss in tidal water of 45 kg N ha"1 yr"1 from the Massachusetts
marsh (Valiela and Teal, 1979). The marshes differ in the net tidal water exchanges of other
forms of nitrogen.
     The  rate of internal nitrogen cycling (assimilation and mineralization) within  ecosystems
is directly proportional to the rate of primary production (e.g., Verhoeven and Arts, 1987),
although high rates of productivity can be supported by high external nutrient inputs when
conditions are unfavorable for high mineralization rates (Verhoeven et al.,  1988).
Mineralization rates differ greatly between the wetland types represented in Table  10-18.
Nitrogen assimilation by  the plant communities varies from 38 to 66 kg N ha"1 yr"1 in the
bog ecosystems compared to 225 to 274 kg N ha"1 yr"1 in the salt marsh and fen ecosystems,
respectively.  The nitrogen cycle in the bog and heathland ecosystems is largely closed
(Figure 10-19).  In contrast, the nitrogen cycle in salt marshes and fens is open, and there is
a great exchange of nitrogen with adjacent systems (Figure 10-19).  In all these ecosystems,
the rate of nitrogen mineralization almost balances plant assimilation in the manner of a
closed cycle (Table 10-18).  However,  it is unlikely that the  salt marsh could function as a
closed system and maintain its productivity or community structure.  Likewise, it is unlikely
that the bog ecosystem could maintain its community structure if the nitrogen inputs were
greatly increased by some means.  In general, as the input rate of nitrogen increases there are
concomitant increases in the output rate and magnitude of the internal cycle (Table 10-18).
        August 1991
                                         10-104
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                           Low N-inputs
                                                             Low N-outputs
                     Oligolrophic habitats
                    eg. ombrotrophic bogs
                      Eutrophic habitats
                       eg. salt marshes
                                                     Assimilation    Mineralization
                                                                '                Low
                                                               '             Productivity
                                                                           Internal Cycling
                                                                             Moderate
                                                                          Species Diversity
                                           Low N-inputs
                                                 Assimilation
                                           High N-inputs
                                                             Low N-outputs
                                                                 •K
                                                                                    Moderate
                                                                                   Productivity
                                                                                 Internal Cycling
                                                                                      High
                                                                    Mineralization   Species Diversity
                                                             High N-outputs
                                                                                      Low
                                                                                Species Diversity
                                                                               High
                                                                         Species Diversity
                                                                          Internal Cycling
                                                 Assimilation
                                                             Mineralization
       Figure 10-19.  Conceptual relationships among trends in nitrogen cycling, productivity,
                       and species diversity along a gradient from oligotrophic (nutrient-poor) to
                       eutrophic (nutrient-rich) habitats.
1

2

3

4

5

6
In ecosystems with closed nutrient cycles and small rates of internal cycling, like bogs, if

nitrogen loadings increase significantly, then we can predict that productivity will increase,

but as will be discussed later,  the increased productivity will be accompanied by changes in

species composition to those adapted to an elevated nutrient regime (Figure 10-19).
       August 1991
                                            10-105
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 10.5.4  Effects of Nitrogen Loading on Wetland Plant Communities
 10.5.4.1  Effects on Primary Production
      Numerous field experiments involving nitrogen fertilization have documented that
 primary production in wetland ecosystems is commonly limited by the availability of
 nitrogen.  Results of this type of experiment are presented in Table 10-19. In all of the
 fertilization experiments included in the table, only sewage sludge, urea, or mineral nitrogen
 in the form of NH4+ or NO3~ were applied. Except in the case of sewage sludge
 applications, where the numerous elements contained in sludge preclude attributing the results
 to any specific element, the stimulation of growth that was observed can be attributed solely
 to application of nitrogen. Rates of application ranged from 7 to 3,120 kg N ha"1 yr"1
 (Table 10-19), and in most studies these have been 1 to 2 orders of magnitude greater than
 rates of atmospheric deposition (Table 10-17). These applications stimulated increases in
 standing biomass by 6 to 413% (Table 10-19).
     Several studies have investigated the effects of different nitrogen sources.  Cargill and
 Jefferies (1984) found that applications of NH4+ increased production of Puccinellia
phiyganodes (a grass) in a sub-arctic salt marsh by 175%,  while equivalent applications of
 NO3" increased production by only 73%.  Applications of NO3" were perhaps less effective
 than NH4+ because of denitrification of NO3" by bacteria in the anaerobic marsh sediments.
 This demonstrates the importance of competition between plants and microbes for specific
 inorganic nitrogen compounds, with plants being the best competitors for NH4+.
     The greatest stimulation of growth is often achieved when nitrogen applications are
 combined  with applications of other nutrients.  In the study of Cargill and Jefferies (1984)
 applications of Pf (inorganic phosphate) combined with NH4+ stimulated production to a
 greater extent than NH4+ alone.  Sanville (1988) observed that combinations of nitrogen, in
 the form of urea,  and Pj stimulated production in a Sphagnum bog to a greater extent than
 nitrogen applications alone, and that singular additions of PJJ had no significant effect on
 growth. These results demonstrate that other nutrients, PA in these examples, become
 secondarily limiting after nitrogen applications reach a threshold.
     In one study of a wet heathland in the central Netherlands, total aboveground biomass
failed to respond on experimental sites fertilized for 3 yr at a rate of 200 kg N ha"1 yr"1, but
 sites fertilized with 40 kg P ha"1 yr"1 did show a significant increase in biomass (Aerts and
       August 1991
                                        10-106
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
TABLE 10-19.
Salt Marsh Ecosystems
Spartina
Spartina
Spartina
Spartina
Spartina
Spartina
Spartina
Pucdnellia
Puccinellia
Car ex.
Panicum hemitomon
Panicum hemitomon
Typha glauca
Sparganium eurycarpum
bog
bog
fen .,
wet grassland
RESULTS OF NITROGEN FERTILIZATION EXPERIMENTS
IN WETLAND ECOSYSTEMS
Rate of N
Application
(kg ha'1 yr4)
200
200
220 ...
650
670
1,040
3,120
320
320
320
30
100
1,350
1,350
300
7
450
450
Length of
Study (yr)
1
1
3
3
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
Control1
Biomass
(g/m2)
1,660
816
320
320
250
450
235
64
64
65
1,320
1,320
1,726
637
180
'200
350
400
Percent?
Increase
16
25
131
269
120
100
413
175
73
146
6
42
36
86
25
10
57
68
N-form
Applied
NH4+
NH4N03
Sludge
Urea
Sludge
NH4+
NH4+
NH/'
N03-
NH4+
NH4+
NH4+
NH4NO3
NH4N03
Urea
' Sludge
Mineral-N
Mineral-N
Reference
Patrick and Delaune (1976)
Gallagher (1975)
Valiela et al. (1975)
Valiela et al. (1975)
Valiela and Teal (1974)
Haines (1979)
Morris (1988)
Cargill and Jefferies (1984)
Cargill and Jefferies (1984)
Cargill and Jefferies (1984)
DeLaune et al. (1986)
DeLaune et al. (1986)
Neely and Davis (1985a)
Neely and Davis (1985a)
Sanville (1988)
Sanville (1988)
Vermeer (1986)
Vermeer (1986)
       'Control biomass is the .maximum, nonfertilized aboveground standing crop
       2Percent increase indicates the response of control biomass during the year of fertilization at the indicated rate of
        application, computed as lOOx(Experimental-Control)/Control
 1     Berendse,  1988).  Thus, wetlands are not universally limited by nitrogen. However, as
                             i                     •           ,             '
 2     discussed above (Atmospheric Nitrogen Inputs - Section 10.5.2) The Netherlands is an area
 3     of extreme high nitrogen deposition, and the threshold for nitrogen limitation is perhaps
 4     exceeded by anthropogenic inputs in this area.
 5           Fertilization experiments of salt marshes in Massachusetts by Valiela and Teal (1974)
 6     and in Louisiana by Patrick and Delaune (1976) involving singular applications of either
 7     nitrogen or Pj demonstrated that primary production was stimulated by nitrogen and not by
 8     phosphorus.  Vermeer (1986) obtained the same result in freshwater fen and wet grassland
 9     communities in The Netherlands.  However, fertilization with nitrogen increased the biomass
10     and dominance of grasses at the expense of other  species in fen and wet grassland
11     communities.  Some Equisetum spp. (horesetail) had a smaller biomass contribution upon
        August 1991
10-107
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     fertilization.  This tendency toward a change in species composition or dominance has been
  2     observed in other fertilization experiments also. Jefferies and Perkins (1977) found species-
  3     specific changes in stem density at a Norfolk, England salt marsh after fertilizing monthly
  4     with 610 kg NO3"-N ha"1 yr"1 or 680 kg NH4+-N ha"1 yr"1 over a period of 3-4 years.
  5          A final conclusion of the data in Table 10-19 is that the stimulation of primary
  6     production by nitrogen applications is not a linear function  of the rate of nitrogen application.
  7     This can be seen by comparing the results of fertilization studies of Spartina (Table 10-19).
  8     The greatest increase in standing biomass, both in terms of absolute amount and in terms of
  9     the percent increase,  was obtained in studies where the control biomass was low.  This
 10     implies that the in situ nitrogen supply in some wetlands already is near  a threshold where
 11     other factors become limiting.  Ultimately, available light energy, water, and temperature are
 12     the limiting factors.
 13          The data included in Table 10-19 pertain to growth  of aboveground biomass only.  In
 14     several of these studies, measurements of belowground biomass were also made (Valiela and
 15     Teal, 1974; Haines, 1979; Valiela et al.,  1976; Gallagher,  1975).  Results were variable with
 16     some studies showing a small decrease in living belowground biomass (Valiela et al.,  1976)
 17     and others showing small increases in belowground macroorganic matter (Gallagher, 1975),
 18     or no change (Valiela and Teal, 1974).  The normal  technique of coring sediments to  measure.
 19     belowground production is subject to great error (Singh et al., 1984).  However, the evidence
20     from controlled growth experiments (Morris, 1982; Steen, 1984) is clear that the response of
21      leaf growth to increased nitrogen supply is much greater than the response of roots.
22          It should be emphasized that all of the fertilization studies summarized in Table  10-19
23      are short term results in which nitrogen was applied for 3 years or less.  We cannot assume
24      that long-term nitrogen applications will yield the same results.  Studies of several wetland
25      ecosystems that have  been fertilized for long periods  by increased atmospheric inputs indicate
26      that changes in species composition and succession accompany the increases in nitrogen
27      loadings and primary production.  These studies are summarized below.
28           One implication of a long-term increase in leaf  growth is that the demand for mineral
29      elements and water from the soil will increase.  Howes et al.  (1986) observed that the rate  of
30      evapotranspiration increased from a salt marsh dominated by Spartina alterniflora in sites
31      where aboveground biomass was increased by nitrogen fertilization.  Increased
       August 1991
10-108
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      evapotranspiration can influence the direction of succession of some wetlands by altering the
 2      water balance of the soil. The feasibility of this mechanism to alter bog succession was
 3      demonstrated in a model by Logofet and Alexandrov (1984).  Their model suggests that
 4      nitrogen inputs greater than a threshold of 7 kg N ha'1 yr"1 can change the direction of
 5      succession from that of an open oligotrophic bog to a mesotrophic bog dominated by trees.
 6     Furthermore, in flowing water systems, like salt marshes,  an increase in aboveground
 7     production should lead to an increased export from the system of'nutrients that are
 8     incorporated in or leached from aboveground biomass. Therefore, the long-term ecosystem
 9     and community responses to increased inputs of nitrogen can not be predicted from results of
10     short term field experiments like those summarized in Table 10-19.
11
12     10.5.4.2 The Fate of Added Mineral Nitrogen
13           Experiments in the field and laboratory have followed the fate of applied nitrogen by
14     using 15N as a tracer.  15N is a stable isotope comprising  0.37% of naturally occurring
15     nitrogen.  It can be quantified together with the more common isotope of nitrogen, 14N,  with
16     a mass spectrometer and is  used experimentally much like radioactive isotopes except that
17     15N is normally used in greater than trace amounts due to the lower sensitivity of the
18     instrumentation used to detect it.
19           Experiments in which different mineral forms of 15N were added to sediments in the
20     absence of plants demonstrate that mineral nitrogen is rapidly  used by the microbial
21     community.  Smith and Delaune (1985) added the equivalent of 100 kg N ha"1 in one
22     application as 15NH4+ to sediments of a shallow saline lake.  They found 15 days after the
23     addition, 20% had been converted to organic nitrogen in the sediment, and the fraction in
24     organic matter remained constant at this level for the remaining 337 days of the experiment.
25     The amount of 15NH4+ in the sediment decreased exponentially to a nondetectable level by
26      Day 200.  Diffusion of NH4+ into the water column and denitrification accounted for a loss
 27      of 80% of the 15NH4+ from the sediment.
 28           Lindau et al. (1988) made single additions of either 15NO3" or 15NH4+, equivalent to
 29       100 kg N ha"1,  to the floodwater within chambers containing  swamp sediment. By Day 27,
 30      only 39.6% and 6.2% of the 15N from NH4+ and NO3", respectively, remained in the
 31      sediment and overlying water column. The remaining fractions had been lost from the
        August 1991
10-109     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
31
 chambers by denitrification.  The loss of 60% of the applied 15NH4+ within 27 days
 demonstrates that NH4+ can be rapidly converted to NO3" by nitrifying bacteria in aerobic
 parts of the system, and that NO3" diffuses into the anaerobic sediments where denitrification
 occurs.  Nitrification was apparently the rate limiting step since the loss of 15N by
 denitrification was  more rapid when it was applied as NO3".
      DeBusk and Reddy (1987) made single additions of 15NH4+ to the floodwater above
 cores of sediments  taken from swamps that had been receiving primary wastewater effluent
 for 2 and 50 years  prior to the experiment. The rate of application was equivalent to 15 kg
 N ha"2.  After 21 days, 0.5 to 2.3% of the added nitrogen was recovered in the flood water,
 largely as NO3",  and 13.6 to 17.8% in the sediment, largely as organic matter.  The
 remaining 80% was apparently lost by denitrification, indicating that conversion of NH4+ to
 NO3" and diffusion of NO3" to anaerobic sites of denitrification is rapid.  This result is
 consistent with that of Lindau et al.  (1988).  Furthermore,  there was no difference in the
 response of the two sediment types,  which demonstrates that the nitrification-denitrificatibn
 potential of sediments is unchanged in sediment receiving sewage  effluent for 50 years.
 However, the bacteria in the sediments must have a continuous supply of suitable carbon
 substrates as  well as nitrogen to sustain continuous nitrification-denitrification reactions.
     Short term measurements of slurrys of marl and peat sediments from the Florida
 Everglades (Gordon et al.,  1986) demonstrated that 10-34% of NO3" added at levels of
 10 and 100 #M (1 iM. = 14 #g N/litre) was rapidly  denitrified within 24 h.  Denitrification
 rates decreased  following this initial burst of activity as the balance of the added NO3" was
 converted to NH4+. This experiment suggests' that the process of dissimilatory nitrate
 reduction to ammonium (reammonification) competes successfully  with the denitrification
process.  However,  this experiment was conducted on sediment slurrys that were incubated
under a nitrogen atmosphere which prevented nitrification reactions from occurring.  Under
an oxygen atmosphere, nitrification would have generated a continuous supply of NO3" and
denitrification would then have consumed a greater fraction of the NO3" over time.
     The behavior of mineral nitrogen applied to vegetated wetland sediments is quite
different from the results described above and indicates that plants successfully compete with
microbes for mineral nitrogen. Delaune et al. (1983) followed the fate of 15NH4+ placed
below the soil surface in a Louisiana salt marsh dominated by Spartina alterniflora. The
       August 1991
                                        10-110     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      singular application of 15NH4+ was equivalent to 72 kg N ha"1. At the end of .the first
 2      growing season, 93% of the added nitrogen was recovered in aboveground biomass, roots,
 3      and soil. An average of 28% was in aboveground biomass and 65% was in soil and
 4      belowground biomass.  The high rate of recovery of 15N in vegetation and soil is consistent
 5      with results of Buresh et al. (1981) and Patrick and  Delaune (1976).  In the study of Delaune
 6      et al. (1983), 15N recovered in soil and belowground biomass declined to 50%  by the end of
 7      the second growing season and to 43% by the end of the third growing season. Nitrogen in
 8      aboveground biomass decreased to 1.2% of original 15N by the end of the third growing
 9      season.  The annual declines were postulated to have occurred due to the loss of nitrogen
10     from the leaves, either by physical transport of aboveground plant material off the site or by
11      decomposition of leaf material at the sediment surface followed by nitrification-denitrification
12     reactions. Similar results were obtained in a freshwater marsh dominated by Panicum
13     hemitomon (maiden cane).  Delaune et al. (1986) added 30 kg ha'1 of 15NH4+-N to
14     sediments and recovered a mean of 80% in the combined aboveground (18%)  and
15     belowground biomass and soil (62%) at the end of the first growing season.            ,
16           Dean and Biesboer (1985) applied 15NH4+  to the flood  water in cylinders containing
17     sediment only and in cylinders containing Typha latifolia (broadleaved cattail). Additions
18     were made biweekly during  a single growing season for a total application equivalent to
19     82 kg N ha"1 season"1., At the end of the growing season, 3 weeks after the last addition^
20     75.3% of added 15N was recovered in the plant-soil system.  A total of 53.6% was contained
21     in the plants, including both above and belowground biomass, while 21.7%( was contained in
22     the soil. In the sediment-only system, only 34.6%  of the added 15N was recovered; most of
23     this, 33% of the added 15N, was in the sediment. The remaining 65.4% was thought to have
24     been lost through nitrification-denitrification reactions.
25           The experiments discussed above indicate that plant biomass is the major sink for free
26     NH4+, and that in the absence of plants, the major fate is nitrification-denitrification. It
27      should be emphasized that the nitrification-denitrification process can dominate only in   .
28      environments, like wetlands, that  have separate and distinct aerobic and anoxic zones of
29      microbial activity where solutes freely, diffuse between them.
 30
 31                            .-.'..-
        August 1991
,10-111      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
31
 10.5.4.3 Effects of Nitrogen Loading on Microbial Processes
      Changes in deposition rate and the chemical form of nitrogen in deposition can
 potentially influence microbial processes and details of the internal nitrogen cycle of
 wetlands.  For instance, decomposition rate is sensitive to the nitrogen concentration of
 decomposing tissues and of the surrounding environment.  Tissues with elevated nitrogen
 concentrations normally are observed to decompose at a faster rate than tissues containing low
 nitrogen concentrations (Marinucci et al.,  1983; Neely and Davis, 1985b). The difference in
 decomposition rates can be impressive.  For example, litter fr6m N-fertilized Spartina
 alterniflom decomposed 50% faster than control litter (Marinucci et al., 1983).
      The dynamics of nitrogen within decomposing litter is also sensitive to the litter's
 nitrogen status. That is, litter of low original nitrogen content often acts as a net nitrogen
 sink during the first months of decomposition, whereas nitrogen-rich litter is likely to be a
 nutrient exporter rather than an accumulator during decomposition (Neely and Davis, 1985b).
                  ;   E '                               *' ' .
 There is some controversy about the mechanism of nitrogen immobilization (Bosatta and
 Staaf, 1982; Aber and Melillo, 1982;  Bosatta and Berendse, 1984), but its importance to the
 wetland nitrogen cycle is recognized (Brinson, 1977;  Morris and Lajtha, 1986; Damman,
 1988).
      Microbial nitrogen transformations are also affected by the nitrogen status of the
 environment.  It is well known that NH4+ inhibits the activity of nitrogen fixing bacteria
 (diazotrophs) (Buresh et al., 1980). It is thought that NH4+ represses synthesis by bacteria
 of the nitrogenase  enzyme (the enzyme in bacteria that accomplishes the transformation).
 There may be direct inhibition by NH4+ of enzyme activity as suggested by Yoch and
 Whiting (1986). Kolb and Martin  (1988) observed a  decrease in nitrogenase activity as well
 as the proportion of diazotrophs among the heterotrophic bacteria in soil after application of
 NH4NO3. They suggested that the decrease in proportion of diazotrophs represents a
 competitive suppression by non-diazotrophs in the presence of combined nitrogen (NH4+ or
 NO3~).  bicker and Smith (1980) observed a similar repression of nitrogen fixation in salt
 marsh sediments amended with either NH4+  or NO3".
     Acidification, which may'be caused by deposition of NOX or NH4+,  can impact the
nitrogen cycle.  Decomposition rate is decreased by acidification  (Leuven and Wolfs,  1988;
Hendrickson, 1985), but the degree of inhibition is dependent upon the buffering capacity of
       August 1991
                                        10-112     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     the litter (Gallagher etal., 1987).  Nitrification is also affected by acidification.  Nitrification
 2     was inhibited at pH 4-5 in cypress swamps (Dierberg and Brezonik, 1982), and at pH 5.4 to
 3     5.7 in lakes (Rudd et al., 1988).  Acidification blocks the nitrogen cycle by inhibiting
 4     nitrification and leads to an accumulation of NH4+ (Roelofs, 1986; Schuurkes et al., 1986,
 5     1987; Rudd et al., 1988).  Also, the ratio of N2O:N2 produced by denitrifying bacteria is
 6     apparently pH sensitive with little N2O being produced under anoxic conditions at pH 7 and
 7     almost 100%  at pH 5 (Focht,  1974).  This is significant, because a shift to N2O production
 8     upon acidification of the environment could have a deleterious effect on stratospheric ozone.
 9          Finally, NO3" and NH4+ have been shown to influence the relative and absolute  ,
10     production of endproducts of dissimilatory nitrate reduction (Blackmer and Bremner, 1978;
11     Knowles,  1982; Prakasam and Krup, 1982).  King and Nedwell (1985)  observed
12     approximately equal reduction to either NH4+ or N2O (in the presence of acetylene the gas
13     added to assay the rate of production of N2O) in sediment slurrys  incubated anaerobically
14     with 250 /iM NO3~. As the nitrate concentration was increased, up to 2 mM (1 mM =
15     14 mg N/litre), the proportion of the nitrate which was denitrified to N2O increased up to
16     83%.  High nitrate concentrations have also been shown to  favor N2O production and inhibit
17     N2 production, perhaps due to the competitive role that exists between NO3~ and N2O
18     terminal electron acceptors during anaerobic respiration (Cho and Sakdinan, 1978; Blackmer
19     and Bremner, 1978).  Seitzinger et al. (1983  and 1984) observed higher ratios of N2O:N2
20     production and higher absolute rates of N2O production from eutrophic  sediments than from
21     unpolluted sediments of Narragansett Bay, RI. Smith and Delaune (1983) reported that N2O
22     production from salt marsh and brackish marsh soils  increased from 0.22 and 0.04 mg
23     N2O-N m"2 day"1, respectively, to 1.5 and 2.9 mg N2O-N m"2 day"1  after amending the
24     sediments with 1.2-1.5 g NH4+-N m"2.  Others  (Betlach and Tiedje,  1981), however, failed
25     to observe an inhibition of N2O reduction in  the presence of NO3". Little is known about  the
                                               '                   '   4    |         t          '*
26     significance of this process in general or the potential for NO3~ or NH4  in deposition to
27     alter natural rates of N2O production.  Only a small  fraction of depositional nitrogen inputs
28     are likely to be evolved as N2O.  For example, Pedrazzini and Moore (1983)  recovered only
29     0.39% of fertilizer-N as N2O from submerged soils amended with 34 g NO3"-N m"2 and 12 g
30     NH4+-N m"2 in the laboratory. However, on a global basis, even small changes in the
        August 1991
10-113
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      production of N2O are potentially significant considering the role of N2O in the destruction
 2      of stratospheric O3 (Crutzen, 1970; Hahn and Crutzen, 1982).
 3
 4      10.5.4.4  Effects on Biotic Diversity and Ecosystem Structure
 5           In the introduction it was pointed out that wetlands harbor about 17% of the total
 6      number of plant species formally listed as endangered in the United States.  While it is
 7      beyond the scope of this review to survey the physiological ecology of these wetland plants,
 8      several species on this list are widely recognized to be adapted  to nitrogen-poor or infertile
 9      environments. These include the isoetids (Boston, 1986) and the insectivorous plants (Keddy
10      and Wisheu, 1989; Moore et al., 1989; Wisheu and Keddy, 1989), like the endangered green
11      pitcher plant, Sarracenis oreophila. In eastern Canadian wetlands, nationally rare species are
12      found principally on infertile sites (Moore et al., 1989, Wisheu and Keddy,  1989).
13      Therefore, management practices should recognize that alterations in competitive relationships
14      between species  occur when the fertility of the environment changes.
15           These assertions are  supported by research on floristic changes related to nitrogen
16      deposition in central Europe.  Ellenberg (1988) surveyed the nitrogen requirements of
17      1,805 plant species from West Germany and concluded that 50% can compete successfully
18      only in habitats that are deficient in nitrogen supply.  Furthermore, of the threatened plants,
19      75 to 80% are indicator species for habitats of poor nitrogen supply.  When stratified by
20      ecosystem type,  it is also clear that the trend of rare species occurring with greater frequency
21      in nitrogen-poor habitats is a common phenomenon across  many ecosystem types
22      (Figure 10-20, 10-21).
23           There is a history in western  Europe of changes in wetland community composition that
24      are thought to result from deposition of atmospheric pollutants.  Sphagnum species are largely
25      absent from ombrotrophic peat bogs in areas of Britain where they were once common
26      (Tallis, 1964; Ferguson and Lee, 1980; Ferguson et al., 1984;  Lee et al., 1986).
27      Ombrotrophic wetlands downwind  of the Manchester and Liverpool conurbations have been
28      extensively modified by atmospheric pollution for greater than 200 yr, with the virtual
29      elimination of the dominant peat-forming Sphagnum mosses from more than 60,000 ha of bog
30      (Lee et al., 1986).  This has led to a loss of water retention and widespread erosion.
31      Nitrogen pollutants from atmospheric deposition have been implicated in this process,
       August 1991
10-114     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                          TOO
                          500
                          300
                          too
                        number
                        of
                        species
                                      n=1805
                  ? X   1    3   5   7  9
                       poor           rich
!4 of species
 SO
threatened
non threat.
                                                  13579
                                                 poor           rich
                                              % fraction of
                                                  species   c)
                                              50
                                              30
                                              10
                                                                (x=0.20l
                                                                17=0.35)
                                                        13579
                                                        poor          rich
       Figure 10-20.  Distribution of 2,164 Central European plant species in the gradient of
                      nitrogen indicator values (from Ellenberg,  1988, p. 379).

         (a) "?" not known; "x" indifferent
            " 1" most pronounced nitrogen deficiency
            "3" poor in nitrogen
            "5" just sufficient in nitrogen
            "7" more often found at places rich in N
            "8" nitrogen indicator                            -
            "9" surplus nitrogen to polluted with N
            "2",  "4", "6" intermediate                            :     .      •   .
         (b) most of the threatened species can only compete on nitrogen-deficient stands (57  "potentially threatened"
            species not regarded).
         (c) the fraction of threatened  species within the total of species in a given class of nitrogen indicator value is
            deminishing with better nitrogen supply.  It remains constant from value "5" upwards (see above).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
although studies of this particular area should be interpreted cautiously because of its long
history of exposure to multiple pollutants. The combination of NO3" and NH4+ deposition,
about 32 kg N ha"1 yr"1, is more than double the deposition rates in the Berwyn Mountains in
North  Wales, which still support healthy  Sphagnum communities, and contributes
significantly to a supraoptimal nitrogen supply (Lee et'al., 1986).  In The Netherlands there
has been a great decline during the past 3 decades in communities dominated by iosetids in
soft water areas and their conversion to later successional stages dominated by grasslands or
August 1991                               10-115      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                        WETLAND and MOORLAND
OFTEN MECHANICALLY
DISTURBED PLACES
                                 1	T	1
                             threatened n=t17~—
                         nan threatened n=119
                       1
                      P°cr                 rich   poor               rich
                      HE ATHLAND and GRASSLAND   WOODLAND and BUSH
      Figure 10-21. Distribution of Central European plant species along a gradient of
                   nitrogen indicator values (see Figure 10-20) across ecosystem types (from
                   Ellenberg, 1988, p. 380).
1     by Juncus bulbosus (rush) and Sphagnum spp. (Roelofs, 1983, 1986; Roelofs et al., 1984;
2     Schuurkesetal., 1986).

3          Vermeer and Berendse (1983) correlated biomass with species numbers and soil

4     chemical characteristics in several fen and grassland communities in The Netherlands.  In

5     fens they found a negative correlation between biomass and NH4+ concentration and a

      August 1991                           10-116     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      positive correlation between biomass and pH.  There was also a positive correlation between
 2      biomass and number of species.  In wet grasslands a positive correlation was found between
 3      biomass and NO3", Pi? and K+.  In all wetland types investigated, they report that species
 4      number was greatest when the standing biomass of the site was in the range of 400-500 g/m"
 5      2. They concluded that domination by a few species is associated with eutrophic conditions
 6      at the high end of the biomass scale as well as with conditions unfavorable for growth at the
 7      low end of the scale. Similarly, in wetlands of eastern Ontario and western Quebec,  the
 8      greatest diversity of  species (3-24 per 0.25 m2) occurs at intermediate standing crops (60-500
 9      g/m"2) and the lowest density of species (2-5 per 0.25 m2) at standing crops greater than
10     1,500 g/m2 (Moore  and Keddy,  1989; Wisheu and Keddy,  1989).  In Great Britain species
11      density in fens was greatest (about 12 per 0.25 m2) at standing crops less than 1,000 g m"2
12     and lowest (3 per 0.25 m2)  when standing crop was 4,000 g m"2 or greater (Wheeler and
13     Giller, 1982).  Exceptions to this trend are found where annual mowing and harvest of
14     wetland vegetation minimize the accumulation of surface litter (Verhoeven et al.,  1988), and
15     possibly where intense pressure from grazing animals favors domination by specific plant
16     species (Jensen, 1985; Berendse, 1985).
17
18     10.5.4.5  Mechanisms of Nitrogen Control Over Ecosystem Structure
19           Nitrogen supplied in excess of a plant's nutritional requirements has a direct toxic effect
20     on some species.  The concentrations of six elements in the tissues of five Sphagnum species
21     have been investigated in relationship to atmospheric deposition in Europe (Ferguson et al.,
22      1984).  When Sphagnum species were transplanted from a relatively  clean-air site to a
23     polluted site, the concentrations of N, S, Pb, Fe, and P increased significantly, but the
24      concentration of K did not.  The greatest change observed was for nitrogen which increased
25      by absolute amounts that varied from 17.7 mg per gram of tissue in Sphagnum recurvum to
26      5.3 mg/g in Sphagnum capillifolium above control levels of about 10 mg/g (1% of dry
27      weight).  Since the  nitrogen supply originating from the soil probably did not differ, as
28      indicated by the similarity in total nitrogen concentration of the peat from the polluted and
29      clean sites, it is possible that nitrogen deposition had a direct effect on nitrogen uptake in
 30      these species.  The  authors concluded that the element supply from deposition at the polluted
 31      site, where N deposition is 43 kg N ha"1 yr"1, is supra-optimal for growth of ombrotrophic
        August 1991
10-117      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
27
28
29
30
31
 Sphagnum species.  They noted the existence of a "good" Sphagnum cover at one site where
 a nitrogen deposition rate of 20 kg N ha"1 yr"1 was measured. Similarly, Press et al. (1986)
 observed tissue nitrogen concentrations as high as 2.5% of dry weight in Sphagnum
 cuspidatwn transplanted to a site of high N deposition in northern Britain and found that this
 level of nitrogen was associated with decreased growth.
      Competitive relationships among species change with the nitrogen status of the
 environment. In weakly buffered  ecosystems, a  high deposition of NH4+  leads to
 acidification and nitrogen enrichment of soil.  Consequently, plant species  characteristic of
 poorly buffered environments disappear.  Among the acid tolerant species there will be
 competition between slow growing and fast growing nitrophilous grasses or grass-like species.
 This process contributes to the observed change from heathlands into grasslands.  Molinia
 caemlea and/or Deschampsiaflexuosa (grasses) expand at the expense of Erica tetralix or
 Calluna vulgaris (shrubs) and other heathland species (Berendse and Aerts, 1984; Roelofs
 et al., 1987; Aerts and Berendse, 1988, 1989). In over 70 heathlands investigated, the shrub
 bogs dominated by Erica tetralix or Calluna had  dissolved NH4+ levels in  the, soil water of
 55 and 84 /iM, while those dominated by the grasses Deschampsia and Molinia had average
 NH4+ concentrations of 248 and 429 /tM (Roelofs et al., 1987).
     Several controlled growth studies also have been carried out to identify the mechanisms
 of nitrogen control over species composition. This is a non-trivial task since there are a great
 number of interactions among biochemical and geochemical processes. There are direct and
 indirect effects of nitrogen deposition, and cause  and effect can be difficult to  ascertain.
 Roelofs (1986), for example, states that acidification, which can result from deposition of
 either NOX, SO42", or NH4+, can  decrease the availability of dissolved CO2 in water  which
 leads to the complete elimination of submerged plant species.  Deposition of NH4+ and its
 subsequent nitrification or absorption by plants generates acidity.  Biochemical conversions of
 SO4 " and NO3" generate alkalinity.  These processes are mediated by bacteria, macrophytes,
 and algae (Kelly et al., 1982; Raven, 1985). Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen can
 significantly affect the nitrogen budget of some wetland ecosystems, their acidity,  and  their
carbon budgets (Roelofs, 1986).
     Schuurkes et al. (1986) studied effects of acidification and nitrogen  supply on growth of
several common wetland plants under controlled laboratory conditions. All species utilized
       August 1991
                                        10-118      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      NH4+ and NO3~ as a nitrogen source except Sphagnum flexuosum, which did not assimilate
 2      NO3".  When NH4rf and NO3" were offered simultaneously in equal amounts, NO3" uptake
 3      was the dominant form of nutrition (63-73%) in plants that are characteristic of soft waters
 4      (low Ca2+ and Mg2+), while NH4+  strongly dominated the nutrition (85-90%) in species
 5      from acid waters.  Differences in the site of uptake, either leaves or roots, among species
                                                                 i         O
 6      were also found.  They concluded that high deposition of NH4  and SO4 ", the most
 7      important sources of acidification in The Netherlands, is leading to an expansion of acid-
 8      tolerant nitrophilous plants.
 9           The nutrition of Sphagnum is apparently species specific. Although S. flexuosum did
10      not assimilate NO3" (Schuurkes et al., 1986), the activity of nitrate reductase in S.
11      cuspidatum (Press and Lee, 1982) and mS.juscum (Woodin et al.,  1985) clearly shows that
12     NO3~ can be utilized by these species. S.  magellanicum was shown to grow best when given
13      the equivalent of 4.1 kg NO3"-N ha"1 yr"1 plus  19  kg NH4+-N ha"1 yr"1 in simulated rain;
14     when given  0.25X that amount of NO3" and 1.5X  (and 4X) as much NH4+ growth decreased
15     (Rudolph and Voigt, 1986).  Bayley et al.  (1987) reported that the dominant Sphagnum spp.
16     in a poor fen in  Ontario, S. juscum and S.  magellanicum, were able to assimilate a NO3"
17     input of  4.71 kg N ha"1 yr"1, including 1.6 kg  N ha"1 yr"1 applied in simulated acid rain, and
18     growth increased at least during the first year after the additional nitrogen was applied.
19     Roelofs et al. (1984) observed that growth of S. cuspidatum was greatest in a medium
20     containing 500 0M NH4+, and less at 1,000 or 100 /tM NH4+, while Press et al. (1986)
21     observed that the best growth of this same species occurred in N-free solutions,  and that even
22     small additions (10 fJ-M) of either NH4+ or NO3" reduced growth.   It is doubtless  that some
23     variations in results of nutritional studies are influenced by other variables, like pH.
24           The genus Sphagnum is an important group in bogs everywhere, and it is important to
25     understand its nutritional physiology  and ecology.   However, it should be emphasized that the
26     consequences of nitrogen fertilization in a  natural environment, with fluctuating climate and
27     competition among numerous species, can be quite different from what may be predicted
28     from studies of  a single species in laboratory culture. For example, Aerts et al. (1989) assert
 29      that competition for light dictates the outcome  of competition between species that differ in
 30      growth rate potential and nutrient requirement.
        August 1991
10-119     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
      In a two-year greenhouse experiment designed to differentiate between acid and nitrogen
 effects, Schuurkes et al. (1987) exposed mixtures of different wetland plant species to
 simulated rain containing various combinations of SO42", NH4+, and NO3". Marked changes
 were observed in systems receiving rain with 510 and 1,585 #M NH4+; plants typical of
 nutrient-poor soft waters, like the isoetids Littoretta uniflora (shoreweed), Luronium natans
 (water plantain) and Pilularia globulifem, were adversely affected at this level of nitrogen
 input, while other species (Juncus bulbosus,  Sphagnum cuspidatum, and the grass Agrostis
 canind) expanded. Acidification  with none or only a small NH4+  addition had no clear
 effects, although biomass of Sphagnum was slightly higher.  Within H2SO4 treatments, only
 pH 3.5 rain markedly acidified the water. Based on these experiments, Schuurkes et al.
 (1987) recommended that to preserve the remaining oligotrophic wetlands, acid inputs should
 not exceed 250 mol ha"1 yr"1, and that the annual nitrogen deposition should not be greater
 than 1,380 mol ha"1 yr"1 or 19.4  kg N ha"1 yr"1 (NO3" + NH4+),  except that the potential
 acidifying influence of this nitrogen input, if in the form of NH4+, exceeds the allowable
 acid input. This limit is supported by Liljelund and Torstensson (1988) -who concluded from
 their review that the limit for many species may be well below 20 kg N ha"1 yr"1 and for
 oligotrophic (nutrient-poor) bogs is probably about 10 kg N ha"1 yr"1. These limits are
 exceeded currently in the United States where wet nitrate deposition alone exceeds 15 kg
 N ha"1 yr"1 over most of the midwest, New York, and New England (Zemba et al.,  1988).
 10.6  AQUATIC EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES
.10.6.1  Introduction
     For a variety of reasons, nitrogen deposition has not historically been considered a
 serious threat to the integrity of aquatic systems.  Most terrestrial systems have been assumed
 to retain nitrogen strongly, leading to a small probability that deposited nitrogen will ever
 make its way to the surface waters that drain these terrestrial systems.  Nitrogen within
 aquatic ecosystems can arise from a variety of sources, including point-source and
 non-point-source pollution and biological fixation of gaseous nitrogen,  in addition to the
 deposition of nitrogen oxides.  In cases where nitrogen is known to be affecting aquatic
 systems, it has been assumed that some source other than deposition is responsible.  The
       August 1991
                                        10-120
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
1      amounts of nitrogen provided to aquatic systems by these other sources often outweigh by a
2      large margin the amount of nitrogen potentially provided by atmospheric deposition.  In the
3,     past decade, however, our understanding of the transformations that nitrogen undergoes
4      .within watersheds has increased greatly, and in areas of the country where non-atmospheric
5   ,   sources of nitrogen are small, we can begin to infer cases where nitrogen deposition is having
6      an impact on aquatic systems.
7           Estimating the effects of nitrogen oxide emissions and nitrogen deposition on aquatic
8    ,  systems is made difficult by the large variety of nitrogen compounds found in air, deposition,
9      watersheds and surface waters, as well as the myriad of pathways through which nitrogen can
10    • be cycled in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. These complexities have the effect of
11      de-coupling nitrogen deposition from nitrogen effects,  and  reduce our ability to attribute
12     known aquatic effects to known rates of nitrogen deposition.  The organization of this section
13     reflects this complexity. Because an understanding of the ways that nitrogen is cycled
14     through watersheds is critical to our understanding of nitrogen effects, the section begins with
15     a brief description of the nitrogen cycle, and of the transformations 'of nitrogen that may
16     occur in watersheds.  Each of the known possible effects of nitrogen deposition (acidification,
17     eutrophication and direct toxicity) is  discussed separately.  Within these discussions, evidence
18      for the importance of nitrogen in causing observed effects  is discussed separately from
19      evidence that deposition is the source of the nitrogen observed in affected systems.
20
21      10.6.2  The Nitrogen Cycle
22           Atmospheric nitrogen can enter aquatic systems  either as direct deposition to water
23      surfaces, or as  nitrogen deposition to the terrestrial portions  of a watershed (Figure  10-22).
24     Nitrogen deposited to the watershed is then routed (e.g., through plant biomass and soil
25     microorganisms)  and transformed (e.g., into other inorganic or organic nitrogen  species) by
26     watershed processes, and may eventually run off into aquatic systems in forms that are only
27     indirectly related to the original deposition.  Much of the  challenge of determining when
 28     nitrogen deposition is having  an effect on aquatic systems depends on our ability to track
 29     nitrogen -on its path through watersheds.  In most cases, this tracking cannot be accomplished
 30      outside of a carefully controlled research program, and we are forced to make educated
 31      guesses  about the likelihood that the nitrogen observed in aquatic systems was originally of
         August 1991
10-121      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                         DEPOSITION
WET
NOJ NH4*
DRY
NOX'NHX
..h.
                                                assimilation N.
                                nitrification
                                    { assimilation
                                                 mineralization,
                                                        DEAD
                                                        ORGANIC
                                                        MATTER
                                                             7
                                                  M1CR08IAL
                                                   BIOMASS
                                                                nitrogen
                                                         fixation
                                                             denitrification
                                          LEACHING
                                          WATER
       Figure 10-22. A simplified watershed nitrogen cycle.  Only the major pathways are
                     shown.  The boxes represent major pools of nitrogen in terrestrial
                     ecosystems, and the lines represent the major pathways and processes
                     affecting nitrogen transformations. The wavy line represents the soil
                     surface. Modified from Skeffington and Wilson (1988).
1
2
3
4
5
6
atmospheric origin. The strength of these educated guesses will depend, to a large degree, on
our ability to identity which nitrogen transformations are occurring and which are not. By
eliminating other possible sources or sinks of nitrogen, we are in a stronger position  to
determine in which cases observed nitrogen effects are caused indirectly by atmospheric
deposition. Our understanding of the nitrogen cycle in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems
therefore plays a central role in controlling our understanding of deposition effects. The key
      August 1991
                                        10-122     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 29
 30
 31
elements of the nitrogen cycle, particularly those that are thought to be important in
determining whether atmospherically-derived nitrogen will have an effect on aquatic systems,
are discussed briefly in this section.

10.6.2.1 Nitrogen Inputs
     Watersheds are generally several orders of magnitude larger than the surface waters that
drain them, and so the majority of the atmospheric deposition that may potentially enter
aquatic systems falls first on some portion of the watershed. Nitrogen may be deposited to
the watershed,  or directly to water surfaces, in a variety of forms, including nitrate (NO3"),
ammonium (NH4+), and organic nitrogen in wet and dry deposition.  In addition, plants may
absorb gaseous nitrogen  (as NOX; Rowland et al., 1985) or nitric acid vapor (Vose et al.,
1989), and nitrogen thus absorbed may  subsequently enter the watershed nitrogen budget as
litter fall, or through the death of plant  biomass (Parker, 1983; Olson et al., 1985).  These
nitrogen constituents are the same as those comprising direct deposition  to terrestrial
ecosystems recently described by Lindberg et al. (1986) also Section 10.4.
      Concentrations of NO3" and NH4+ in precipitation vary widely throughout North
America, depending largely on the proximity of sampling sites to sources of emissions.
Galloway et  al. (1982) report mean concentrations of NO3~ and NH4+ of 2.4 /zeq • L"1 and
2.8 #eq • L"1,  respectively, for a site in central Alaska.  In the Sierra Nevada Mountains of
California, mean concentrations of NO3" and NH4+ for the period  1985-1987 were 5.0 and
5.4 /ieq • L"1,  respectively (Williams and Melack, in press a).  In a comparison of nitrogen
deposition at lake and watershed monitoring sites in the northern United States and southern
Canada, Linsey et al. (1987), found NO3" concentrations ranging from  15 to  40 #eq • L"1 and
NH4+ concentrations from 10 to 50 /*eq . L"1 in areas considered remote but influenced by
prairie dust and long range acidic deposition; neither ion dominated over the  other.  In some
 areas closer  to anthropogenic nitrogen sources (e.g., in northeastern United States and
 southeastern Canada) volume-weighted  mean NO3" concentrations range from 30 #eq • L"1
 (e.g., in the Adirondack and CatsMll mountains of New York) to 50 jLteq • L"1 (e.g., in the
 eastern Great Lakes region), while mean NH4+ concentrations range from 10 to 20 #eq • L"1
 in the same  areas (Stensland et al., 1986).  Ammonium concentrations are highest
 (ca. 40 #eq  • L"1) in the agricultural areas of the mid-western United States.
        August 1991
                                          10-123     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
 9
      Deposition of nitrogen will depend on the concentration in precipitation, the volume of
 water falling as precipitation, and the amount of nitrogen in dry deposition (see
 Section 10.4 of this report; see also Sisterson et al., in press).  The last of these values (dry
 deposition) is difficult to measure, and is often estimated as a fraction (e.g., 30-40%) of wet
 deposition (Baker, 1991). Given the range of concentrations mentioned in  the previous
 paragraph, and the volumes of precipitation falling in different regions of North America,
 estimates of nitrogen deposition rates range from less than 12 eq • ha"1 •  yr"1 in Alaska to
 near 800 eq • ha"1 • yr'1 in the northeastern United  States (Table 10-20).                   !
                                                                                        f".
          TABLE 10-20.  RATES OF NITROGEN DEPOSITION IN SEVERAL
                            AREAS OF NORTH AMERICA
Area
Alaskaa
(Poker Flat)
Sierra Nevada, CAb
(Emerald Lake)
Ontario, Canada0
(Experimental Lakes Area)
British Columbia, Canada0
Upper Midwestd
Southeastern U.S.e
(Walker Branch, TN)
New Hampshire0
Catskillsa
Adirondacksd
eq
NO3"
6.9

79

125

260
300
540

464
580
590
• ha"1 • yr"1
NH4+
4.8

85

140

130
210
180

200
292
190
Total
11.7

164

265

390
510
720

664
874
780
Source
Galloway et al. (1982)

Williams and Melack (in press, a)
N JT 7 /
Linsey et al. (1987)

Feller (1987)
Driscoll et al. (1989a)
Lindberg et al. (1986)

Likens (1985)
Stoddard and Murdoch (1991)
V S
Driscoll et al. (1989a)
       "Dry deposition estimated as 35% of total deposition.
       bDry deposition sampled as part of sno'yvpack; no correction for dry deposition made.
       "Bulk precipitation measurements; no correction for dry deposition made.
       dValues corrected for dry deposition based on ratios in Hicks (1989).
       "Includes estimates for dry deposition and gaseous uptake of nitrogen areas, DON can occur in greater
       concentrations than the inorganic species (Moore and Nuckols, 1984).
1
2
     Generally NO3" dominates over NH4+ at sites close to emission sources (Linsey et al.,
1987; Altwicker et al., 1986).  Dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) concentrations are highly
      August 1991
                                         10-124     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     variable in precipitation but often amount to 25% to 50% of inorganic nitrogen deposition
 2     values (Linsey et al., 1987; Manny and Owens, 1983; Feller, 1987).
 3                      ..          .
 4     10.6.2.2  Transformations
 5           Because the majority of nitrogen deposition falls first on some portion of the watershed,
 6     the transformations that nitrogen undergoes within the watershed (e.g., in soils, by microbial
 7   .  action, and in plants) will play a major role in determining what forms and amounts of
 8     nitrogen eventually, reach surface waters.  Much of the following discussion is therefore
 9     focused on terrestrial processes that alter the forms and rates of nitrogen  supply.  It is these
10     processes that, to a large degree, determine whether nitrogen deposition will ever reach lakes,
11     streams and estuaries, and therefore they are very important in controlling the effects of
12     nitrogen deposition.  Many of these same processes occur also within surface waters, and a
13     specific discussion of these processes, and their importance,  follows the discussion of
14     nitrogen transformations.
15            ,
16     Nitrogen Assimilation
17           Nitrogen assimilation is the uptake and metabolic use of nitrogen by plants
18      (Figure 10-22).  Assimilation by both terrestrial and  aquatic plants will play a role in
19     determining whether nitrogen deposition affects aquatic systems.  Assimilation by the
20     terrestrial ecosystem controls the form of nitrogen eventually released into surface waters, as
21      well as affecting the acid/base status of soil and surface waters.  Terrestrial assimilation is a
22      major form of nitrogen removal in watersheds, and may in fact be sufficient to prevent all
23      atmospherically-derived nitrogen from reaching surface waters (Vitousek and Reiners,  1975).
24           Nitrogen is the most commonly limiting nutrient in forest ecosystems in North America
25      (Cole and Rapp, 1981).  Because the primary use of nitrogen in plant biomass is the
26      formation of amino acids, and reduced nitrogen is the most energetically favorable form  of
27      nitrogen for incorporation into amino acids, uptake of NH4+ is  generally favored over uptake
28      of NO3" by terrestrial plant species.  This demand for NH4+ over NO3" contributes to the
29      common pattern of low NH4+ concentrations in waters draining forested watersheds in the
30      United States.  The form of nitrogen used  by terrestrial ecosystems effects strongly the
31      acidifying potential of nitrogen deposition  (Figure 10-23).  Ammonium uptake is an
        August 1991
10-125      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
31
 acidifying process (i.e., uptake of NH4+ releases one mole of hydrogen per mole of nitrogen
 assimilated):

                       NH4+ + R • OH = R • NH2 + H2O + H+           (Eq.  10.6-1)
 The biological uptake of NO3~, on the other hand, is an alkalinizing process (i.e., uptake of
 NO3" consumes one mole of hydrogen per mole of nitrogen assimilated):
                       R • OH  + N03- + H+  = R • NH2 + 2O2
                         (Eq. 10.6-2)
 Nitrification
      Nitrification is the oxidation of ammonium (NH4+) to nitrate (NO3\), and is mediated
 by bacteria and fungi in both the terrestrial and aquatic portions of watersheds.  It is an
 important process in controlling the form of nitrogen released to surface waters by
 watersheds, as well as in controlling the acid/base status  of surface waters (Figure 10-22).
 Nitrification is a strongly acidifying process, producing two moles of hydrogen for each mole
 of nitrogen (NH4+) nitrified (Figure 10-23):
NH+
2Q  =
2H
                                                    +
                                                         H2O
(Eq. 10.6-3).
     Because nitrification in forest soils commonly transforms NH4+ into NO3", the
acidifying potential of deposition (attributable to nitrogen) is often defined as the sum of
NH4+ and NO3", assuming that all nitrogen will leave the watershed as NO3" (e.g., Hauhs
etal.,  1989).
     In most soUs, nitrification is limited by the supply of NH4+ (Likens et al.,  1970;
Vitousek et al., 1979),  creating a high demand for NH4+ on the part of nitrifying soil
microbes.  This microbial demand for NH4+, coupled with the demand for NH4+ on the part
of terrestrial plants (discussed above) leads to surface water concentrations of NH4+ which
are almost always unmeasurable.  Nitrification rates may also be limited by inadequate
microbial populations, lack of water, allelopathic effects (toxic effects produced by inhibitors
manufactured by vegetation), or by low soil pH. Of these other potential  limiting factors,
soil pH plays an obviously vital role in any discussion of the acidification  of surface waters
       August 1991
                                        10-126     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
            IN       IN
           wor    NH4*
                  -1
                                            IN
                                                    IN
                   ORGANIC
                   MATTER
                                     J3  -1
                        -1
                                                               DEPOSITION, FERTILISERS
                                       PLANTS

                                                             PENITRIFIERS
                              ./DECOMPOSITION •
                                                        FIGURES REPRESENT H
                                                        TRANSFERS TO THE
                                                        SOIL OR WATER
                   OUT     OUT
       Figure 10-23.  The effect of nitrogen transformations on the watershed hydrogen ion
                     budget.  One hydrogen ion is transferred to the soil solution or surface
                     water (+1) or from the soil solution or surface water (-1) for every
                     molecule of NO3" or NH4+ which crosses a compartment boundary.  For
                     example, nitrification follows the pathway for NH4+ uptake into organic
                     matter (+1), and is leached out as NO3" (+1), for a total hydrogen ion
                     production of +2 for every molecule of NO3" produced. Modified from
                     Skeffington and Wilson (1988).
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
by nitrogen deposition. Nitrification has traditionally been thought of as an acid-sensitive
process (Driscoll and Schaefer, 1989; Aber et al.,  1989), but high rates of nitrification have
been reported from very acid soils (i.e., pH <4.0) in the northeastern United States
(Vitousek et al., 1979; Novick et al., 1984; Rascher et al., 1987) and in Europe (van
Breemen et al., 1982). In the southeastern United States, Montagnini et al. (1989) were
unable to find any effect of pH on nitrification, or to stimulate nitrification by buffering acid
soils.  In a survey of sites across the northeastern United States,  McNulty et al.  (1990) found
no correlation between nitrification rates and soilpH, but a strong association (r2 = 0.77)
with rates of nitrogen deposition.  The weight of evidence suggests that nitrification will
proceed at low  soil pH values as long as the supply of NH^4" is  sufficient.
       August 1991
                                        10-127      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     Denitrification
  2          Denitrification is the biological reduction of NO3" to produce gaseous'forms of reduced
  3     nitrogen (N2, NO, or N2O) (Payne,  1981).  Denitrification is an anaerobic process (i.e., it
  4     proceeds only in environments where oxygen is absent) whose end product is lost to the
  5     atmosphere (Figure 10-22).  In terrestrial ecosystems, denitrification occurs in anaerobic
  6     soils, especially boggy, poorly drained soils, and has traditionally been considered a relatively
  7     unimportant process outside of wetlands (Post et al., 1985).  It has been suggested, however,
  8     that denitrification could be an episodic process, occurring after such events as spring snow
  9     melt and heavy rain storms, when soil oxygen tension is reduced (Melillo et al.,  1983).  No
 10     single equation can describe the denitrification reaction, because several end-products are
 11     possible.  However, denitrification is always an alkalinizing process, consuming one mole of
 12     hydrogen for every mole of nitrogen denitrified (Figure 10-23).  Denitrification can be
 13     involved in the production or consumption of N2O, a product which may have considerable
 14     significance as a greenhouse gas (Matson and Vitousek, 1990; Halm and Crutzen, 1982).  In
 15     a review of the effects of acidic deposition on denitrification  in forest soils, Klemedtsson and
 16     Svensson (1988)  conclude that denitrification rates are often limited by the availability of
 17     oxygen, and may therefore be relatively insensitive to increases in nitrogen deposition.  It has
 18     been suggested that the production of N2O may increase in acidified soils (Knowles, 1982),
 19     but few field data are available  to test this idea. Rates of N2O production in soil waters have
20     been shown to increase markedly after forest clear-cutting (Bowden and Bormann, 1986;
21      Melillo et al., 1983), and in areas of both high nitrogen deposition, and intensive forest
22     management, N2O production may be of concern.  Nitrous oxide production is strongly
23      influenced by soil temperature,  soil NO3" concentration, and  soil moisture; Davidson and
24     Swank (1990) suggest that one or more of these factors may commonly limit N2O production
25      in natural systems.
26
27     Nitrogen Fixation
28          Gaseous atmospheric nitrogen (N^ can be fixed to produce NH4+ by a wide range of
29      single-celled organisms including blue-green algae (cyanobacteria), and various aerobic and
30      anaerobic bacteria. Symbiotic nitrogen-fixing nodules are present on the roots of some early
31      successional forest species (Boring et al., 1988).  In headwater streams, nodules on rooting
       August 1991
10-128
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
•2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
structures of riparian vegetation (e.g., Alnus sp.) can also be important nitrogen fixers
(Binkley, 1986).  Ordinarily, nitrogen fixation has no direct effect on the acid/base status of
soil or surface waters:
                      N2 + H2O •¥ 2R • OH = 2R • NH2 +' 3/iO2
                       (Eq. 10.6-4)
Nitrogen fixation in excess of biological demand, however, can lead to nitrification or
mineralization of organic nitrogen, and ultimately lead to acidification of soil or surface
waters (Franklin et al.,  1968; Van Miegroet and Cole, 1985).

Mineralization
     Mineralization is the bacterial decomposition of organic matter,  releasing NH4+ that
can subsequently be nitrified to NO3~.  Mineralization is an important process in watersheds,
as it recycles nitrogen that would otherwise be lost from the system through death of plants,
'or as leaf litter (Figure  10-22).  In a comparative study of mineralization in soils,
Nadelhoffer et al. (1985) found nitrogen mineralization rates ranging from 3,600 to
7,600 eq  • ha^-yr'1 under deciduous tree species, and from  2,300 to 4,700 eq • ha"1 • yr"1
under coniferous species.  These rates should be compared to nitrogen deposition rates of
400-800 eq • ha"1 • yr"1 for high deposition areas of the Northeast.  Nadelhoffer et al. (1985)
also report estimated rates of nitrogen uptake that were 20 'to 80%  higher than rates of
mineralization, suggesting that mineralization can supply the majority, but not all, of the
nitrogen needed for plant growth in these forests.
     The effect of mineralization on the acid/base status of draining waters will depend on
the form of nitrogen produced.  The conversion of organic nitrogen (e.g., from leaf litter) to
NH4+ consumes one mole of hydrogen per mole of nitrogen produced (Figure 10-23),  and
can be thought of as the reverse of the reaction in Equation  10.6-1.  Organic nitrogen which
is mineralized and subsequently  oxidized (nitrified)  to NO3" (Equation 10.6-3) produces a  net
of one mole of hydrogen per mole of NO3" produced.  Because the production of organic
nitrogen (i.e., assimilation) can  either produce or consume hydrogen (depending on whether
NO3" or NH4+  is assimilated), the net (ecosystem)  effect of mineralization depends both on
the species entering the watershed, and on the species'leaving the watershed (Figure 10-23).
        August 1991
                                         10-129
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
      In ecosystems where plant growth is limited by the availability of nitrogen, „
 mineralization is also limited by nitrogen, in the sense that additions of nitrogen to the leaf
 litter will speed decay, and increase the rate at which nitrogen is immobilized by
 decomposers (Melfflo et al., 1984; Taylor et al., 1989). Nitrogen limitation of
 decomposition is in part due to the low nitrogen content typical of litter,  resulting from the
 retranslocation of nitrogen out of leaves during senescence.

 10.6.2.3 Nitrogen Saturation
      Much of the debate over  whether aquatic systems  are being affected by nitrogen
 deposition centers on the concept of nitrogen saturation of forested watersheds. .Nitrogen
 saturation can be defined as a situation where the supply pf nitrogenous compounds, from the
 atmosphere exceeds the demand for these compounds on the part of watershed plants and
 microbes (Skeffington and Wilson, 1988;  Aber et al., 1989).  Under conditions of nitrogen
 saturation, forested watersheds that previously retained nearly all of nitrogen inputs, due to a
 high demand for nitrogen by plants and microbes, begin to supply more nitrogen to  the
 surface waters  that drain them.
     The major aspects pf the nitrogen saturation concept can be described by a simple
 analogy. In this analogy, forested watersheds are likened to, a dry sponge.  When a sponge is
 dry, it has  a high capacity to absorb water deposited on its  surface, just as a
 nitrogen-deficient forest has a high capacity to accumulate nitrogen from deposition.  The
 capacities of both the forest and the sponge are related to the rate of supply of nitrogen or
 water, respectively, at least in the early stages of nitrogen or water addition. .That is, if we
pour water slowly onto the sponge it will  retain nearly all of it, but if the water is poured
quickly the sponge will retain most of the water, while some leaks out. This same
characteristic in forests results in the common  seasonal pattern for streams that drain forested
watersheds.  During seasons of low nitrogen deposition  (e.g., during dry  seasons) nearly all
of the deposited nitrogen is retained in soils and  forest biomass, and stream water
concentrations of nitrogen are low or undetectable.  When nitrogen deposition is at a high
rate, however, it may exceed (temporarily) the capacity  of the system to absorb nitrogen, and ,
some will leak into the streams that drain  the watersheds. This simplified pattern of low
       August 1991
                                         10-130     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     nitrogen concentrations in streams during dry seasons, and high concentrations during wet
 2     seasons, is a very common one.
 3          Returning to the sponge analogy, we know that if we add water to the sponge at a
 4     constant rate Over some period of time, eventually the sponge will become saturated; its
 5     capacity to absorb water will be very low, and the rate of water leakage from the sponge will
 6     depend on the rate of water addition. In a similar manner, the capacity of forested
 7     ecosystems to retain nitrogen may be exceeded by long-term high rates of nitrogen
 8     deposition.  At some critical point in this process, forested watersheds will begin chronically
 9     "leaking" nitrogen to the streams that drain them.  This'is the phenomenon commonly
10     thought of as nitrogen  saturation. The major difference between this simple sponge analogy
11     and the cycling of nitrogen in nitrogen-deficient forests is that the forests have
12     nitrogen-retaining capacities (i.e., biological demands for nitrogen) which vary with season,
13     depending on whether  forest growth is occurring or not (i.e., nitrogen retention is higher
14     during  the growing season).  One major effect of this complexity is to amplify the seasonal
15     differences in nitrogen leakage. This amplification results when the  growing season
16     coincides, as it does in most forested areas, with a period of lower deposition (late spring and
17     summer); many forests are dormant during the seasons of highest atmospheric deposition
18     (winter and early spring) and so both supply and demand favor the leakage of some nitrogen
19     from the system.
20           Aber et al.  (1989)  have proposed a hypothetical time course for a watershed response to
21     'chronic nitrogen  additions (Figure 10-24), describing both the changes in nitrogen cycling
22     that are proposed to occur, as well  as the plant responses to changing levels of nitrogen
23     availability.  The four stages (Figure 10-24), correspond to those described by Smith (1974)
24     and Bormann (1982) for ecosystem response to pollution loading.  Stage 0 is the
25     pre-treatment condition.  In Stage 1, increased deposition is occurring, but effects on the
26     ecosystem are not evident.  Many forested watersheds in the United  States would be
27     considered to exist at this stage.  For a limiting nutrient such as nitrogen, a fertilization effect
28     might result in increased ecosystem production and tree vigor at Stage 1.  Retention of
29     nitrogen is very efficient, and little or no nitrogen would be lost to surface waters that drain
30     Stage 1 watersheds.
        August 1991
10-131
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                  c


                  •I
                         N Mineralization
                    Nitrification


                N Inputs
                                                        NO 3
                                                      Leaching
                                                             N2O
                                                           Emission
           Additions
             Begin

Stage     0          1
                                                l          I
                                             Saturation    Decline


                       NPP
                       Foliar Biomass
                       Foliar N Concentration
                       Fine Root  Mass

                       Nitrate Assimilation
                 Stage
              i
           Additions
             Begin

           0
                                                l          l
                                             Saturation    Decline
1
Figure 10-24. Hypothetical time course of forest ecosystem response to chronic nitrogen
              additions.  Top: relative changes in rates of nitrogen cycling and nitrogen
              loss.  Bottom: relative changes in plant condition (e.g.,  foliar biomass and
              nitrogen content, fine root biomass) and function (e.g, net primary
              productivity (NPP) and nitrate assimilation) in response to changing levels
              of nitrogen availability. From Aber et al. (1989).
August 1991
                      10-132
          DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1           In Stage 2 of the Aber et al. (1989) hypothetical time course, negative effects occur, but
 2      they are subtle, nonvisual, and/or require long time scales to detect.  Stage 2 could be
 3      considered to correspond to the "damp" stage of the sponge analogy,  where rapid rates of
 4      water addition  will cause leakage; if nitrogen is added over short time scales (e.g.,  in storms)
 5      to Stage 2 watersheds, leakage of NO3" would result.  Only in Stage 3 do visible effects on
 6      the forests occur, resulting in major environmental impacts.  Aber et  al.  (1989) emphasize
 7      that different species and environmental conditions could alter the timing of effects  illustrated
 8      in Figure 10-24).
 9           The high capacity of forested watersheds to retain nitrogen is  responsible for the concept
10      that nitrogen deposition does not affect aquatic ecosystems. However, as nitrogen saturation
11      proceeds, the ability of watersheds to retain nitrogen decreases, and the potential for nitrogen
12      effects  in aquatic systems grow.  One of the major tasks in assessing  nitrogen  effects on
13      surface waters  is the recognition of the early stages of nitrogen saturation.  It has been
14      suggested (Grennfelt and Hultberg, 1986; Driscoll and Schaefer,  1989; Stoddard and
15      Murdoch,  1991) that chronic nitrogen leakage from forested watersheds (Stage 3 in
16      Figure  10-24) will  be preceded by an amplification of the seasonal  pattern in surface water
17      nitrogen. The rationale behind this suggestion stems from the idea that biological activity is
18      probably not limited be a single nutrient or physical factor year-round.  Forest growth,  for
19      example, is probably limited by temperature during the winter months (Likens et al.,  1977;
20      Vitousek, 1977), and passes through a phase in the spring when growth is limited either by
21      temperature or by nitrogen, depending on whether nitrogen deficiency or cold is more severe
22      at any given point in time.  As forests become more nitrogen sufficient (i.e., as nitrogen
23      saturation proceeds), the period of temperature limitation is likely to be extended further and
24      further into the spring season,  or to be replaced by a period of limitation by some other
25      nutrient or physical factor.  This longer period of low nitrogen demand (on the part of
26      forests) is likely to produce larger or longer periods of elevated nitrogen concentrations  in
27      lakes and streams during spring snow melt.  This  extended period of low demand for nitrogen
28      need not extend very far into the spring snowmelt season in order to cause nitrogen episodes,
29      as soil  water charged with nitrogen may be quickly transported to soils zones below the
30      rooting zone (i.e.,  below the soil level where biological uptake can affect the nitrogen
31      concentration)  by the movement of water during snow melt (Murdoch and Stoddard, in
        August 1991
10-133
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      review).  A number of other mechanisms can produce similar results, but there are few data

 2      to support their existence.  These mechanisms include:
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33

34
35
36
37

38
39
40
     •  An increase in the length or severity of the winter.  By delaying the onset of snow
        melt, longer winters would allow a larger accumulation of nitrogen in the snow pack,
        and could prolong the period of temperature limitation in forests, lowering the
        demand for nitrogen as the dormant period is ending.  Limited available evidence,
        however, suggests that winters have become shorter rather than longer, and that snow
        melt is occurring earlier in the year now than it did 20 years ago (Schindler  et al.,
        1990).

     •  Prolonged defoliation of forest trees (e.g., by insect outbreaks) could lower the forest
        demand for nitrogen and potentially increase NO3" concentrations in runoff water
        during  the growing season. Defoliation should have little effect  on snowmelt NO3"
        concentrations, however, because these episodes occur largely in deciduous forest
        that are devoid of leaves during the dormant (winter)  season.
     •  Increases in nitrogen deposition.  These could result in more severe N03" episodes,
        independent of any change in nitrogen saturation, by producing a larger accumulation
        of nitrogen in winter snow packs. Because most snow melts while the forest is still
        largely dormant, an increase in nitrogen storage in the snowpack could lead to an
        increase in the severity of snowmelt NO3" episodes, without any long-term  change in.
        nitrogen retention occurring. There is no evidence, however, that nitrogen
        deposition is increasing anywhere in North America (Simpson and Olsen, 1990;
        Bowersox et al., 1990). Estimates of nitrogen deposition calculated from. NOX
        emissions in the Northeast suggest that nitrogen deposition increased more-or-less
        linearly from the turn of the century until 1970, but has remained relatively constant
        in the past 20 years (Husar,  1986).  The longest available records of nitrogen
        deposition for a site in  the Northeast (Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest) suggest
        that rates of nitrogen deposition peaked in the early 1970s and have either decreased
        (NH4+) or remained constant (NO3~) since then (Likens et al.,  1984; Hedin et al.,
        1987).
     A change in the ability of forests to retain nitrogen remains, therefore, the most likely

mechanism producing increases in snowmelt NO3" episodes.  According to this scenario, the,

earliest symptoms of nitrogen saturation of soils may be most visible as increases in the

severity of nitrogen episodes in the surface waters.
        August 1991
                                         10-134
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     10.6.2.4  Processes Within Lakes and Streams
 2           All of the transformations and processes discussed above (primarily in the context of
 3     terrestrial ecosystems) also take place in lakes, streams and estuaries.  The emphasis on the
 4     transformations that occur in the watershed, before nitrogen reaches surface waters, results
 5     from the necessity to establish a linkage between nitrogen deposition and nitrogen effects in
 6     aquatic systems, but should not be taken to suggest that nitrogen transformations  within
 7     aquatic systems are of minor importance in the nitrogen cycle.  In a very real sense, nitrogen
 8     cycling within the terrestrial ecosystems controls whether nitrogen deposition will reach
 9     aquatic systems (and in what concentrations), while nitrogen cycling within lakes, streams
10     , and estuaries controls whether the nitrogen will have any measurable effect.
11           Assimilation by aquatic plants is a key process in the potential eutrophication of surface
12     waters by nitrogen, and may also play a role in their acid/base status.  The following
13     discussion of nitrogen assimilation in aquatic systems will deal mainly with the algal and
14     microbial community in phytoplankton (microscopic algal and bacterial species suspended in
15     the water column) and periphyton (algal species growing attached to surfaces). Although
16     macrophytes (macroscopic algal species) are also important in the assimilation of nitrogen,
17     the biomass of phytoplankton and smaller  microbes is potentially most reactive to changes in
18     nitrogen supply.  Algal uptake is a major component of the eutrophication process, and forms
19     the basis of trophic production in streams and lakes.  It can also play a large role in the
20     , acid/base status of lakes.  Uptake of NC)3" in lakes is an alkalinizing process,  consuming one
21     mole of hydrogen per mole of nitrogen assimilated (Kelly etal., 1990).
22     .      Like terrestrial plants, aquatic plants favor the uptake of NH4+ over the uptake of
23     NO3"; NH4+ uptake is energetically favorable because NO3"  must first be reduced before it is
24     physiologically available to algae (Reynolds, 1984).  In some circumstances organic forms of
25     nitrogen are also available for uptake by aquatic plants (reviewed by Healey, 1973).  The
26     preferences by algae for the different forms of nitrogen can be related to the history of
27     availability of nitrogen species.  In some algal species, the synthesis of the enzyme (nitrate
28     reductase) required to utilize a NO3" pool  can be induced by high concentrations of NO3" in
29     the absence of NH4+  (Healey, 1973).  The production of nitrate reductase appears to be
30     repressed by the presence of NH4+ (Eppley et al., 1979).
        August 1991
10-135
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1          The potential uptake rate of inorganic nitrogen is related to ambient inorganic nitrogen
  2     concentrations (e.g., Syrett, 1953), that is, cells transferred from nitrogen-deficient media to
  3     nitrogen-sufficient media show higher rates of uptake than cells that are grown and remain in
  4     nitrogen-sufficient media. McCarthy (1981) summarized several studies which consistently
  5     showed that potential (saturated) NH4+ uptake rates were greatly enhanced in
  6     nitrogen-deficient cells. This relationship is now used along with various other indices as a
  7     basis to identify the degree of nitrogen limitation in phytoplankton (Vincent,  1981; Suttle and
  8     Harrison, 1988). Under nitrogen-replete conditions, saturated uptake rates are low but
  9     increase with increasing nitrogen deficiency.
 10          A crucial difference between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems with respect to nitrogen
 11     is that nitrogen additions do not  commonly stimulate growth in aquatic systems, as seems to
 12     be the case in terrestrial systems, and nitrogen limitation may in fact be the exception in
 13     aquatic systems rather than the rule.  Determining whether nitrogen limitation is a common
 14     occurrence in surface waters will play a large role in determining whether nitrogen deposition
 15     affects the trophic state of aquatic ecosystems.
 16          The effects of nitrogen supply on uptake and growth rates in phytoplankton and
 17     periphyton is the subject of volumes of literature, a  summary of which is beyond the scope of
 18     this section. However, certain aspects of the limitation of algal growth by the supply of
 19     nitrogen and other nutrients will  be discussed later as it relates to enrichment effects from
20     nitrogen deposition.  For other details on algal nutrition, the reader is  referred to reviews by
21     Goldman and Glibert (1982), Button (1985), Kilham and Hecky (1988), and Hecky and
22     Kilham  (1988).
23          Denitrification plays a much larger role in nitrogen dynamics in aquatic ecosystems than
24     it does in terrestrial ones.  In streams, rivers and lakes, bottom sediments are the main sites
25     for denitrification (see Seitzinger, 1988a) although open-water denitrification has also been
26     reported (Keeney et al., 1971).  In lake and stream sediments the main source of NO3",
27     although potentially available from the water column, is NO3" produced when organic matter
28     is broken down within the sediments, and the resulting NH4+ is subsequently  oxidized
29     (Seitzinger, 1988a). Denitrification is an especially  important process  in large rivers and
30     estuaries, and will play a large role in discussions of nitrogen loading to estuaries and near
31      coastal systems (see Section 10.6.4.2).  In a recent review of denitrification in freshwater and
        August 1991
10-136      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
estuarine systems, Seitzinger (1988a) reported denitrification rates that were 7 to 35% of
nitrogen inputs in large rivers, and 20 to 50% ^of inputs in estuaries.  Denitrification in
aquatic ecosystems is an alkalinizing process, consuming one mole of hydrogen for every
mole of NO3" denitrified.
     Estimates of denitrification rates range from 54 to 345 fimol • m"2 h"1 in streams with
high rates of organic matter deposition,  12 to 56 /xmol • m"2 h"1 in (nutrient-poor)
oligotrophic lakes, 42 to 171 /imol fimol • m"2 h"1 in eutrophic lakes and 77 to 232 fimol •
m"2 h"1 in estuaries (see Seitzinger, 1988a).  These values are in the range where
denitrification can deplete NO3" pools.  Rudd et al. (1990) have reported an increase in the
rate of denitrification from less than 0.1 /imol  • m"2 h"1 to over 20 fimol • m"2 h"1 in an
oligotrophic lake when nitric acid was added in a whole-lake experimental acidification,
suggesting that freshwater denitrification may limited by NO3" availability.  Denitrification
can account for 76 to  100% of nitrogen flux at sediment-water interfaces in  rivers, lakes and
estuaries (Seitzinger, 1988a).   In the Potomac and Delaware rivers, where organic sediment
deposition is extreme due  to sewage inputs, the loss represents  35 and 20%, respectively, of
external nitrogen inputs.  In estuaries, it can represent a 50% loss. In deep  mud  of slow
flowing streams, the process can effectively  reduce NO3"  concentrations in the water column
by as much as 200 #eq • L"1 over a 2 km length of stream (Kaushik et al., 1975; Chatarpaul
and Robinson, 1979). This depletion  amounts to 75% of the daily input of NO3" during a
growing season and it has been sufficient to  consider denitrification as a method for NO3"
removal in the management of some slow-moving streams having a deep organic  substrate
(Robinson etal., 1979).
     Nitrogen fixation counteracts denitrification losses of nitrogen from surface  waters and
is fundamental to replenishing fixed forms of nitrogen in  all aquatic ecosystems.  It is thought
to be the main process responsible for maintaining surplus inorganic nitrogen in lakes and
streams and is fundamental to  the fact that primary production in most lakes and  streams is
limited by phosphorus (Schindler,  1977). In estuaries, however, there is a higher loss of
nitrogen relative to that fixed or imported.  The loss may be due to high rates of
denitrification (Seitzinger, 1988a), which creates relative  nitrogen deficiencies.
     Rates of nitrogen fixation are generally related to trophic status in freshwater.  Howarth
et al.  (1988a) show that fixation in low-, medium-, and high-nutrient lakes is generally
        August 1991
                                         10-137     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
27
28
29
30
31
  <0.02, 0.9 to 6.7, and 14.3 to 656.9 mmol • N : m"2 • yr"1 respectively.  Fixation is also
 closely correlated with the abundance of blue-green algae (Wetzel,  1983), which suggests that
 the algae, rather than bacteria, dominate nitrogen fixation in lakes.  Although nitrogen
 fixation does occur in sediments, that source is of minor importance compared to that in the
 water column.  Only in very nutrient-poor lakes, where nitrogen loading from all other
 sources is small, can nitrogen fixation in sediments gain some significance (e.g., 32% and
 6% of total inputs in Lake Tahoe, California, and Mirror Lake, New Hampshire,
 respectively; Howarth et al., 1988a).
      Unlike the nitrogen fixation community in lakes, nitrogen fixers in estuaries are
 dominated by bacteria,  producing rates of 0.1 to 111 mmol • N • m"2 •  yr"1  (Howarth et al.,
 1988a).  Highest rates occur in deep organic sediments, but even these are a relatively small
 percentage of total nitrogen inputs to estuaries (reviewed by Howarth et al.,  1988a).
      As in terrestrial watersheds, rates of nitrification in lakes and  streams are often limited
 by low concentrations of NH4+.  Supply rates of NH4+ from watersheds are often low
 (except in cases of point-source pollution), and nitrifying organisms have little substrate with
 which to work.  Two exceptions to this generality are cases where NH4+ deposition is
 extremely high, such as near agricultural areas, and cases where NH4+  is produced  within
 the aquatic system. Experiments on whole lakes and in mesocosms in Canada have
 confirmed the acidifying potential of ammonium additions from deposition to surface waters
 (Schindler et al., 1985; Schiff and Anderson, 1987).  Ammonium deposition is especially
 deceptive,  because in the atmosphere it can combine as a neutral salt with SO42', resulting in
 precipitation with near-neutral pH values, as  seen in The Netherlands  (van Breemen  and van
 Dijk, 1988).  Once deposited, however, the ammonium can be assimilated, leaving an
 equivalent amount of hydrogen, or nitrified, leaving  twice the amount of hydrogen.  There is
 some evidence from Canadian whole-lake experiments that nitrification in lakes is an acid
 sensitive process; Rudd et al. (1988) presented data indicating that nitrification was blocked  at
pH values less than 5.4 in an experimentally-acidified lake, leading  to a  progressive
accumulation of NH4+ in the water column.
     High NH4+ concentrations may also  result in lakes whose deeper waters become anoxic
during periods of stratification (usually late winter or late summer).  Production of NH4+ (by
decomposition) can be substantial under anaerobic conditions, and NH4+ may accumulate in
       August 1991
                                        10-138     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     the anoxic water.  Nitrification of this NH4+ occurs when lakes mix during spring or fall,
 2     supplying the oxygen necessary for nitrifying organisms to survive (Wetzel, 1983).  In
 3     estuaries, the processes of nitrification (aerobic) and denitrification (anaerobic) may be
 4     closely coupled at the sediment surface, with mineralization  in the anaerobic sediments
 5     supplying NH4+ to nitrifiers at the sediment/water interface (Jenkins and Kemp, 1984).
 6     Except in cases where the overlying water becomes anoxic (as may be common in the
 7     summer months), the nitrifying organisms supply NO3" back to the sediments for subsequent
 8     denitrification. In both cases described above (the annual cycle in lakes, and the
 9     sediment/water interface cycle in estuaries), the main influence of nitrification is to  recycle
10     nitrogen within the system, and to supply NO3" to either denitrifiers Or to nitrogen-deficient
11     algae.
12           In lakes, streams, and estuaries, water is in constant movement, and to a large extent
13     the effects of nitrogen cycling on biota are regulated by the  local hydrology.  In lakes,
14     oxidation and reduction reactions are perceived to occur as cycles in the sense that water has
15     a residence time lasting from a few weeks in small ponds to many years in large lakes.
16     Nitrogen species are assimilated, contribute to biological productivity, the organic forms are
17     subsequently mineralized, and the resulting inorganic forms  enter various oxidizing  and
18     reducing pathways mediated  by a microbial community within a single body of water.  One
19     or more complete cycles can be followed within a single lake before export downstream.
20           In streams, and to some extent in estuaries, nitrogen dynamics are more closely
21     dependent on the physical movements  of water. As nitrogen compounds are cycled among
22     the biotic and abiotic components of the stream ecosystem, they are subject to downstream
23     transport.  Among stream ecologists, this coupling between  nutrient cycles and water
24     movement is  termed "nutrient spiralling"  (e.g., Elwood et al., 1980; Newbold et al.,  1983).
25     According to this concept, nitrogen cycling occurs in most streams, but little or no recycling
26     occurs in any one place.  Nitrogen is instead regenerated or transformed at one point in the
27     stream and transported downstream before subsequent reutilization or retransformation
28     (Stream Solute Workshop, 1990). The movement of water can increase nutrient uptake rates
29     and growth rates in freshwater algae (Whitford and Schumacher, 1961,  1964) by continually
30     resupplying nutrients at cell walls. This constant replenishment  prevents steep concentration
31     gradients from becoming established, as can happen in less active lake water (Gavis, 1976).
        August 1991
10-139
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
31
 It also maintains high rates of production and nutrient assimilation.  Biomass eventually
 sloughs from substrata, and drifts as fine particulate organic matter (Meyer and Likens, 1979)
 for settlement, decomposition and mineralization downstream. Very high flows associated
 with intense precipitation events are physically disruptive and can increase the concentration
 of particulates transported downstream (Bilby and Likens, 1979; Holmes et al., 1980).
 Efficiencies of nutrient uptake also decrease with increasing flows because of reduced contact
 time that a given ion has with the reactive substrate (Meyer, 1979).
      One important consequence of nutrient spiralling in streams is that any block in the
 nitrogen cycle upstream can have potential effects on nitrogen conditions downstream.
 Mulholland et al. (1987), for example, have presented experimental evidence that leaf
 decomposition (mineralization) in streams is inhibited at low pH values.  Because
 mineralization of organic matter is an important process in resupplying nitrogen to organisms
 downstream, the existence of acidic headwaters could influence biotic conditions in
 downstream portions of streams where acidification is not important.

 10.6.3  The Effects of Nitrogen Deposition on Surface Water Acidification
      The acidification processes of lakes and streams are conventionally separated into
 chronic (long-term) and episodic (event-based) effects.  A great deal of emphasis in the past
 decade has been placed on chronic acidification in general, and on chronic acidification by
 sulfate in particular (e.g., Galloway et al., 1983; Sullivan et al., 1988; Brakke et al., 1989).
 This emphasis on sulfate (SO42~) has resulted largely because sulfur deposition rates are often
 higher than those for nitrogen  (S deposition rates are approximately twice the rates of
 N deposition in the Northeast; Stensland et al., 1986), and because NO3" appears to be of
 negligible importance in surface waters sampled during summer and fall index periods
 (Linthurst et al., 1986).  As mentioned previously, summer and fall are seasons when
 watershed demand for nitrogen is very high, while supply rates (from deposition) are low,
 creating a low probability that nitrogen, in any form, will be leached  into soil and surface
 waters unless the watersheds have achieved nitrogen saturation.  Under conditions of low
nitrogen deposition (or high nitrogen demand), nitrogen leaking from terrestrial ecosystems,
as described earlier, is more likely to be a transient (or seasonal)  phenomenon than a chronic
one.  As a result, the primary impact of nitrogen in surface water acidification will be
       August 1991
                                        10-140      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     observed during high-flow seasons, and particularly during snow melt.  It has been estimated
 2     that 40% to 640% more streams in the eastern U.S. are acidic during spring episodes than are
 3     acidic during spring base flow, while the number of acidic Adirondack lakes is estimated to
 4     be three times higher during the spring than during the fall (Eshleman,  1988).
 5          Surface waters are conventionally considered acidic if their acid neutralizing capacity
 6     (ANC) is less than zero.  The ANC of a lake or stream is a measure of the water's capacity!
 7     to buffer acidic inputs, and results from the presence of carbonate and/or bicarbonate (or
 8     alkalinity), aluminum and organic acids in the water (Sullivan et al., 1989).  The main
 9     purposes of this section are to evaluate the evidence for chronic acidification by nitrogen
10     deposition in North America, and to determine what role nitrogen deposition plays in episodic
11     acidification.
12
13     10.6.3.1  Chronic Acidification
14          In the United States, the most comprehensive assessment of chronic acidification of
15     lakes and streams comes from the National Surface Water Survey (NSWS) conducted as part
16     of the National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (NAPAP).  The NSWS surveyed the
17     acid/base chemistry of both lakes and streams using an "index period" concept.  The goal of
18     the index period concept was to identify a single season of the year that exhibited low
19     temporal and spatial variability  and that, when sampled, would allow the general condition of
20     surface waters to be assessed (Linthurst et al.,  1986).  In the case of lakes, the index period
21     selected was autumn overturn (the period when most lakes are mixed uniformly from top to
22     bottom), while in streams the chosen index period was spring base flow (the period  after
23     spring snow melt and before leaf-out) (Messer et al.,  1988). Because of the strong
24     seasonality of the nitrogen  cycle in  forested watersheds (described earlier) the choice of index
25     period plays a very large role in the assessment of whether nitrogen is an important
26     component of acidification.
27          The results  of the Eastern Lake Survey (Linthurst et al,  1986), based on a.probability
28     sampling of lakes during fall overturn, suggest that nitrogen compounds make only  a small
29     contribution to chronic acidification in North America.  Henriksen (1988) has proposed that
30     the ratio of NO3~:NO3~+SO42~ in surface waters be used as an index of the influence of
31     NO3" on chronic acidification status.  This index assesses the importance of nitrogen relative
        August 1991
10-141
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
to the importance of SO42~, which is usually considered more important in chronic
acidification (see above). A value greater than 0.5 indicates that NO3" has a greater influence
on the chronic acid/base status of surface waters than does SO42~. Henriksen (1988)
summarized the ratios for acid-sensitive sites worldwide; .these results are repeated in
Table 10-21. In general, Henriksen's results show that NO3" can be as important as SO42" in
some parts of Europe, but that ratios are low in the United States, except for selected
Adirondack systems (see also Henriksen and Brakke, 1988).
     One problem with Henriksen's approach, however, is that he compares data collected
intensively (i.e., through multiple samples per year) with survey  data collected during a
single index period. The data presented for Adirondack lakes in  Table 10-21, for example,
were collected monthly over a two year period  (Driscoll and Newton, 1985), and the
apparent difference between the Adirondacks and the rest of central New England (from the
regional survey data) could well result from comparing fall values to annual mean values,
Annual mean values include high spring NO3" concentrations and will be therefore be higher
than concentrations measured only in the autumn. As a result, the high ratio values reported
in Table 10-21 for the Adirondacks are a good indication that NO3" may be important in
chronic acidification (i.e., NO3" makes up about 15% of acid anions), but the low ratios
reported for the Eastern Lake Survey are not informative.  Unfortunately, no regional lake
survey with representative annual, or spring, values exists for the United States,  and
questions concerning the role of NO3" in chronic lake acidification remain unanswered for
areas outside of the Adirondacks.
     Values of NO3~:NO3~+SO42" ratios are also available for streams from the National
Stream Survey (NSS; Kaufmann et al., 1988), as well as from other regional stream surveys
(e.g., Stoddard and Murdoch, 1991).  Median values for each of the regions covered in these
surveys are given in Table 10-22.  The NSS data have the advantage of having been collected
during a spring baseflow index period.  This period is been shown to be a good index of
mean annual condition for streams (Messer et al., 1988; Kaufmann et al., 1988), but is not
an estimate of worst case condition,  as concentrations taken during spring snow melt would
be.  The Catskill regional data included in Table 10-22 are from  a stream survey which
included multiple samplings per year (Stoddard and  Murdoch, 1991).  Several stream  regions
exhibit ratios as high as those reported for the Adirondacks by Henriksen (1988). Several
       August 1991
                                        10-142
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   TABLE 10-21. CONCENTRATIONS OF NITRATE, SULFATE, AND RATIOS
 OF NITRATE TO THE SUM OF NITRATE AND SULFATE IN RUNOFF WATERS
      IN ACIDIFIED AREAS OF THE WORLD (FROM HENREKSEN, 1988)
Location
West Germany
Lange Bramke
Lange Bramke
Baverischer Wald
Rachelsee
Gr. Arbersee
Kl. Arbersee
Poland
'The Giant Mts.
Maly Staw
Wielki Staw
Czechoslovakia
Tatra Mts.
Av 53 lakes
Jameke
Popradake
:Vyshe Wahlenbugoro
Vyshe Furkotake
Bohemia
Carne
Certovo
Prasilske
Plesne
Laka (man-made)
Zdarske (man-made)
Krusne hory Mts.
Sumava Mts.
Liz
Albrechtec
Norway
Birkenes
Storgama
Sweden
Stromyra
Scotland
Av 22 lakes in
the Galloway area
Year

1977
1984

1985
• 1985
1985


1986
1986


1984
1980-82
1980-82
1980-82
1980-82

1986
1986
1986
19.86
1986
1986
1986

Apr 86
Apr 86

1973-86
1973-86

1984-85


1979 '
PH

5.8
. 6.2

4.5
4.7
4.5


5.5
4.7


6.1
4.4
6.6
5.6 „
6.3

4.5
4.2
4.5
4.7
5.5
6.5
5.2

5.89
6.22

4.52
4.56

6,54


4.97
A*eq
N03-

16
49

77
9.8
93


13
40


37
2
40
44
42

93 .
85
40
41
45
0
118

136
36

9
12

17


21
•L-1
so/-

233
230

135
118
108


92
140'


97
171
111
74
110

152
182
120
203
61
156
1216

390
358

140
77

- 180


103
NO3-:N03- + SO/'

0.06
,0.18

0.36
0.45
0.46


0.12
0.22


0.27
0.01
0.26
0.37 ,
0.28

0.38
0.32 ,
0.25
0.17
0.42
0.00
0.09

0.26 ,
0.09

0.06
0.13
•

0.09


0.17
Sampling
Methoda

Intensive
Intensive

Unknown
Unknown
Unknown


Unknown
Unknown


Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
•Unknown
Unknown

Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown

. Unknown
Unknown

Intensive
Intensive

Intensive
E '. - " -

Unknown
August 1991
10-143    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
     TABLE 10-21 (eont'd).  CONCENTRATIONS OF NITRATE, SULFATE, AND
   RATIOS OF NITRATE TO THE SUM OF NITRATE AND SULFATE IN RUNOFF
    WATERS IN ACIDIFIED AREAS OF THE WORLD (FROM HENREKSEN, 1988)
 Location
Year
pH
       SO/
                                                           NO3-:NO3-
                           Sampling
                           Method3
 United States
 Adirondacks
 Big Moose Lake
 Cascade Lake
 Darts Lake
 Merriam Lake
 Lake Rondaxe
 Squash Pond
 Townsend Pond
 Windfall Pond
 Bubb Lake
 Constable Pond
 Moss Lake
 Black Pond
 Clear Pond
 Heart Lake
 Otter Lake
 West Pond
 Woodruff Pond
 Eastern Lake Survey**
 Southern Blue Ridge
 Florida
 Upper Midwest
 Upper Great Lakes
 Wisconsin
 Peninsula, Michigan
 NE Minnesota
 Maine
 S New England
 C New England
 Canada
1980s
1985
5.1
6.5
5.2
6.4
5.9
4.6
5.2
5.9
6.1
5.2
6.4
6.8
7.0
6.4
5.5
5.2
6.9
24
29
24
26
23
24
27
26
16
17
26
 4
 1
 5
 9
10
 2
         3
         1
         0.7
         0.6
         1.0
         0.6
         0.9
         0.2
         0.8
         0.3
140
139
139
141
134
131
154
141
131
149
141
130
139
106
138
111
147
        32
        94
        57
        50
        57
        78
        62
        75
       141
       101
0.15
0.17
0.15
0.16
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.16
0.11
0.10
0.16
0.03
0.00
0.05
0.06
0.08
0.01
              0.09
              0.01
              0.01
              0.01
              0.02
              0.01
              0.01
              0.00
              0.01
              0.00
 Monthly
 Monthly
 Monthly
 Monthly
 Monthly
 Monthly
 Monthly
 Monthly
 Monthly
 Monthly
. Monthly
 Monthly
 Monthly
 Monthly
 Monthly
 Monthly
 Monthly


Fall index
Fall index
Fall index
Fall index
Fall index
Fall index
Fall index
Fall index
Fall index
Fall index
Experimental Lakes
Area, Ontario
Sudbury, Ontario
Kekimkujik,
Nova Scotia

1980s
1980s
1980s


1
2
2
3

78
252
252
78

0.01
0.01
0.01
0.04

Intensive
Intensive
Intensive

"Sampling methods are listed as either monthly, intensive (more frequent than monthly) or based on a single fall
 index sample.
"Median value for regional population of lakes.
August 1991
              10-144     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
         TABLE 10-22. CONCENTRATIONS OF NITRATE, SULFATE, AND RATIOS
         OF NITRATE TO THE SUM OF NITRATE AND SULFATE IN STREAMS OF
            ACID-SENSITIVE REGIONS OF THE UNITED STATES. VALUES ARE
        MEDIANS FOR REGION (FIRST AND THIRD QUARTBLES IN PARENTHESES)
Location
Poconos/Catskills
Northern Appalachians
Valley and Ridge
Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plainb
Southern Blue Ridge
Piedmont
Southern Appalachians
Ozarks/Ouachitas
Florida
Catskill Regional Survey0
Median value for 51 streams
Year pH
National Stream Survey*
1986 6.96
6.60
7.05
5-98
6.99
6.80
7.33
6.62
5.48

1984-86 6.60
/*e;
N03-
6
(2-18)
30
(12-4
1)'
10
(3-31)
-
8
(2-16)
2
(0-5)
16
(3-32)
1
(1-4)
5
(1-10)

29
(14-4
7)
g-L'1
SO/
169
(154-184)
171
(135-347)
154
(84-294)
-
17
(10-27)
48 ,
(19-63)
58
(30-104)
59
(48-83)
22
(9-30)

138
(125-151)
N03':N03- + SO/
0.03
(0.01-0.10)
0.14 •
(0.02-0.19)
0.09
(0.01-0.22)
-
0.28
(0.08-0.44)
0.03
(0-0.20)
0.32
, ' . (0.04-0.40)
0.02 •
(0-0.06)
-'.".. . •
0,19
. (0.10-0.25)

0.17 ;
•. ; (0.09-0.26)
      "Values for pH are for entire region (Kaufmann et al., 1988); medians for NO3", SO/ and the
      NO3':NO3" + SO/ ratio exclude sites with potential agricultural or other land use impacts (Baker et al.,
      in press).
      bThe influence of agricultural and land use practices could not be ruled out for any of the sites in the
      Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain (Baker etal., in press).                      ,
      Trom Stoddard and Murdoch (1991).
1

2

3
regions in the southeastern United States exhibit high ratios in part because their current
SO42" concentrations are relatively low., The Southern Blue Ridge, in particular, has the
lowest NO3" concentrations found in the NSS, and the relatively high NO3":NO3"+SO42"
      August 1991
                                     10-145  '   DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
31
 ratios in this region could be considered misleading.  The stream data do suggest that the
 Catsldlls, Northern Appalachians, Valley and Ridge Province, and Southern Appalachians all
 show some potential for chronic acidification due to NO3".  In all of the stream regions in
 Table 10-22, as well as the lake regions in Table 10-21, however, chronic acidification is
 more closely tied to SO42" than to NO3".
      The data presented thus far in this  section establish which regions of the country show
 potential problems with chronic acidification by NO3", but do not indicate whether the source
 of the NO3" is atmospheric deposition.  As described  earlier, several watershed processes
 (e.g., mineralization, nitrification, and nitrogen fixation) may combine to produce NO3", and
 may be responsible, at least in  part, for high NO3" concentrations observed  in surface waters.
 On a regional scale, it is not possible to  attribute surface water NO3" to any single source,
 but two efforts have been made to relate rates of nitrogen  deposition to rates of nitrogen loss
 from watersheds.  Data from the NSS (Kaufmamret al., 1991) suggest a strong correlation
 between concentrations  of streamwater nitrogen (NO3~ + NH4+) at spring base flow and
 levels of wet nitrogen deposition (NO3~ + NH4+) in each of the NSS regions
 (Figure 10-25a).  The only exception  to this relationship is the Pocono/Catskill region, where
 nitrogen deposition is highest (450 eq • ha"1 • yr"1), but where stream water nitrogen
 concentrations fall below what is expected, based on results from the other regions.  The
 median streamwater NO3" value for the Catskills alone (from Stoddard and Murdoch, 1991;
 Table 10-22) is 29 /ieq-L"1, and fits the relationship much  more closely, suggesting that
 watersheds in the southern portion of this region (the Poconos) are retaining nitrogen more
 strongly than the northern portion. Driscoll et al. (1989) collected input/output budget data
 for a large number of watersheds in the United States  and  Canada, and  summarized the
 relationship  between nitrogen export and  nitrogen deposition  at all of the sites
 (Figure 10-25b).  The authors stress that the data illustrated intFigure 10-25b were collected
 using widely differing methods  and over  various time scales (from one year  to several
 decades).  Given the numerous possible sources of NO3~, and the, watershed pathways
 through which nitrogen may be cycled, the relationships illustrated in Figure 10-25 should not
be over-interpreted, nor should  they be construed as an illustration of cause  and effect.
However, the relationships do show that watersheds  in mariy regions of North America are
retaining less than 75% of the nitrogen that enters them, and that the amount of nitrogen
       August 1991
                                        10-146  .    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                50 +
                     (a)    NSS-1 Subregions
                            100      200      300     400      500
                            Wet NO" + NH4+Deposition (eq/ha/yr)
              o>
              at
              DC
              •e
               O)
               O
4UU -r
350 -
300-
250-

200-

150-
100 _

50 _

0

(b) o

0 0
O o
-.:••- 0 • °
o
o
o •
o
0 0 0
8 ° • °
o: o
<-» O O O
-> o o Q.—SQ 	 ,— — n i ° °i 	 Q 	 1 	
                            100   200    300   400     500    600
                            Rate of Nitrogen Wet Deposition (eq/ha" 1/yr"1)


Figure 10-25.  (a) Relationship between median wet deposition of nitrogen (NO3" +
              NH4+) and median surface water nitrogen (NO3~ + NH4  )
              concentrations, for physiographic districts within the National Stream
              Survey that have minimal agricultural activity.  [Subregions are:
              Poconos/Catskills (ID), Southern Blue Ridge Province  (2As), Valley and
              Ridge Province (2Bn), Northern Appalachians (2Cn), Ozarks/Ouachitas
              (2D), Southern Appalachians (2X), Piedmont (3A), Mid-Atlantic Coastal
              Plain (3B), and Florida (3C)].  From Baker et al.  (in press),  (b)
              Relationship between wet deposition of nitrogen (NO3~ +  NH4 ) and rate
              of nitrogen export for watershed studies throughout North America.
              Sites with significant internal sources of nitrogen (e.g., from alder trees)
              have been excluded.  Data from Driscoll and Schaefer (1989).
 August 1991
10-147     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
31
 being leaked from these watersheds is higher in areas where nitrogen deposition is highest.
 This pattern is consistent with what we would expect if large areas of the eastern United
 States were experiencing the early stages of nitrogen saturation.  Furthermore, both analyses
 suggest a threshold value of nitrogen deposition (between 200 and 300 eq • ha"1 • yr"1) above
 which substantial watershed losses of nitrogen might begin to occur.
      Chronic acidification due to nitrogen deposition is much more common in Europe than
 in North America (Hauhs et al., 1989). Many sites show chronic increases in nitrogen export
 from their watersheds (e.g., Henriksen and Brakke, 1988; Hauhs, 1989), and at sites with the
 highest stream water NO3" concentrations (i.e., Lange Bramke and Dicke Bramke in West
 Germany)  NO3" concentrations no longer show the seasonally  which is expected from normal
 watershed  processes (Hauhs et al., 1989).  Henriksen and Brakke (1988) have reported
 regional chronic increases in surface water NO3" in Scandinavia in the past decade.  These
 increases in NO3"concentration are associated with increasing concentrations of aluminum,
 which is toxic to many fish species (Henriksen et al,  1988; Brown, 1988). There is some
 evidence that NO3" has a greater ability to mobilize toxic aluminum from soils than does
 SO4 " (James and Riha, 1989). Chronic acidification attributable to ammonium deposition
 has also been demonstrated in The Netherlands (van Breemen and van Dijk, 1988;  Schuurkes,
 1986,  1987).  As described earlier, ammonium in deposition can be nitrified to produce both
 NO3" and hydrogen ions, which are subsequently leaked into surface waters.  Rates of NO3"
 and NH4+ deposition are much higher in Europe (in  some places deposition is > 2>000 eq •
 ha"1 • yr"1; Rosen, 1988) than in the United  States (Table 10-20), and it has been suggested
 that chronic nitrogen acidification is more evident in Europe than in North America because
 nitrogen saturation (see discussion above) is further progressed  in Europe.

 10.6.3.2 Episodic Acidification
     In a recent comprehensive examination, Wigington et al. (1989) reported that acidic
episodes have now been observed in a wide range of geographic locations in Scandinavia
(Norway, Sweden, Finland), Europe (United Kingdom, Scotland, Federal Republic of
Germany, Czechoslovakia), and Canada (Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia), as well as the
United States.  In the United States, they noted that episodes have been registered in surface
waters in the Northeast,  Mid-Atlantic,  Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain, Southeast, Upper
       August 1991
                                        10-148     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     Midwest, and West regions.  In the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain and Southeast regions, all of
 2     the episodes cataloged to date have been associated with rainfall.  In contrast, most of the
 3     episodes in the other regions are related to snow melt, although rain-driven episodes
 4     apparently can occur in all regions of the country.
 5          The regional importance and severity of episodic acidification have not been quantified;
 6:    that is,  the regional information on chronic acidification that was gained from the NSWS has
 7     no parallel in episodic acidification.  As a result, all of the information we currently have
• 8     about the importance of episodes, and the influence of nitrogen deposition on episodes, comes
 9     from site-specific studies.  It is important to stress that even within a given area, such as the
10     Northeast, major differences can be evident in the occurrence, nature,  location (lakes or
11     streams), and timing of episodes at different sites.
12           Eshleman (1988) has used a simple stream mixing model (Johnson et al., 1969) to
13     predict the number of streams in the NSS that would be acidic during spring  episodes,  based
14     on their spring baseflow chemistry.  In addition, Eshleman used an empirical model  relating
15     fall index period lake chemistry to spring episodic chemistry, using data from EPA's
16     Long-Term Monitoring (LTM) project (Newell et al., 1987), to predict the number of
17     Adirondack lakes that undergo episodic acidification.  His results are repeated in Table 10-23.
18     Eshleman's approach has been criticized (see discussion below), largely because it assumes
19     that all lakes, regardless of their baseline ANC, undergo the same relative depression in ANC
20     during  episodes (i.e., that the relationship between fall and  spring ANC is linear). This
21     assumption ignores any effect of increased NO3" during episodes, which may be greater in
22     low ANC lakes (Schaefer et al., 1990;  Schaefer and Driscoll, in press). Given this  criticism,
23     Eshleman's estimates of the number of episodically  acidified systems should probably be
24     considered conservative.
25           A number of processes contribute to the timing and severity of acidic episodes (Driscoll
26      and Schaefer, 1989).  The most important of these processes are:
27           •  dilution of base cations (Galloway et al., 1980) by high discharge;
 28
 29           •  increases in  organic acid concentrations (Sullivan et al., 1986) during periods  of high
 30              discharge;
 31
 32           •  increases in  SO42" concentrations (Johannessen et al., 1980) during periods  of high
 33              discharge; and
        August 1991
10-149      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
            TABLE 10-23.  ESTIMATES OF THE NUMBER AND PROPORTION OF
       CHRONICALLY AND EPISODICALLY ACIDIC LAKES AND STREAM REACHES
          IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES. CHRONIC CONDITIONS BASED ON
          RANDOM SAMPLE OF SYSTEMS DURING INDEX CONDITIONS (SPRING
         BASEFLOW OR FALL OVERTURN). EPISODIC CONDITIONS ESTIMATED
            FROM TWO-BOX MIXING MODEL (FOR STREAMS), OR EMPIRICAL
       RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN FALL INDEX PERIOD AND SPRING SNOW MELT
                   CHEMISTRY (FOR LAKES) (FROM ESHLEMAN, 1988)
Index Conditions (ANC <0),
Subregion*
Stream subregions
Poconos/Catskills
Southern Blue Ridge
Valley and Ridge
Northern Appalachian Plateau
Ozarks/Ouachitas
Southern Appalachians
Piedmont
Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain
Florida
Lake subregions
Adirondacks
Number

209
0
636
499
0
121
0
1,334
678

138
Proportion (%)

6.4
0
4.9
5.8
0
2.5
0
11.8
39.2

10.7
Episodic Conditions (ANC <0)
Number

746
39
1,126
3,224
75
364
0
3,132
963

459
Proportion (%)

23.0
2.2
8.6
37.2
1.8
7.4
0
27.8
55.7

35.6
      'For streams, all data are from the upper end of sampled stream reaches (Kaufmann et al., 1988), except for the
      Southern Blue Ridge, where data from lower ends of stream reaches were used.
1
2
3
4

5
6
7

8
9
     •  increases in NO3" concentrations (Galloway et al., 1980; Driscoll and Schafran,
       1984; Schofield et al., 1985) during periods of high discharge.

In addition to these factors, which produce the chemical conditions characteristic of episodic
events, the likelihood of an acidic episode is also influenced by the chemical conditions
before the episode begins. Episodes are more likely to be acidic, for example, if the
baseflow ANC of the stream or lake is low.  In this way, acid anions, especially SO42", can
contribute to the severity of an acidic episode, even though they do not increase during the
event, by lowering the baseflow ANC of the stream or lake (Stoddard and Murdoch, 1991).
     August 1991
                                   10-150     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1          In many cases, all of these processes will contribute to episodes in a single aquatic
 2     system. Dilution, for example, probably plays a role in all episodic decreases in ANC and
 3     pH in all regions of the United States (Wigington et al., 1989). Dilution results from the
 4     increased rate of runoff, and channeling of runoff through shallower soil layers, that occurs
 5     during storms or snow melt; the shorter contact time produces runoff with a chemical
 6     composition closer to that of atmospheric deposition than is typical of baseflow conditions
 7     (e.g., Driscoll and Newton, 1985; Peters and Murdoch, 1985; Stoddard, 1987a). Because
 8     precipitation is usually more dilute than stream or lake water, storm runoff produces surface
 9     waters that are more dilute than during non-runoff periods. In a sense, dilution sets the
10     baseline condition to which is added the effects of organic acids and atmospherically derived
11     SO42'and NO3'.
12          Little information exists about the effects of changes in organic acids during episodes.
13     Driscoll et al. (1987a) and Eshleman and Hemond (1985) concluded that organic acids did
14     not contribute to snowmelt episodes  in the Adirondacks or in  Massachusetts,  respectively. At
15     Harp Lake in Canada, organic acidity  is believed to remain constant (Servos  and Mackie,
16     1986) or decrease (LaZerte and Dillon, 1984) during snowmelt episodes. Haines (1987) and
17     McAvoy (1989) have  documented increases in organic acidity during rain-caused episodes in
18     coastal Maine and in Massachusetts.
19          Storage of SO42~ in watersheds,  and subsequent release  of SO42" during episodic events,
20     is well documented in many parts of Europe (Wigington et al., 1989), but has not been
21     commonly found in the United States. Sulfate episodes have been described for the Leading
22     Ridge area of Pennsylvania (Lynch et  al., 1986) and at Filsen Creek in Minnesota (Schnoor
23     et al., 1984), but are not widespread.  Sulfate does contribute to episodic acidity, however, in
24     the sense that concentrations may remain high during events,  and contribute to a lower
25     baseline ANC;  the effects of other factors, such as increased  NO3", will be in addition to any
26     constant effect of SO42~ in lowering the baseline ANC (Stoddard and Murdoch, 1991). ,
27           The main goal of this section is  to determine when increases in NO3" concentrations
28     play a significant role in episodic acidification.  In the Adirondacks, for example, strong
29     NO3" pulses in both lakes (Galloway et al., 1980; Driscoll and Schafran, 1984) and streams
30     (Driscoll et al.,  1987b) are apparently the primary factor contributing to depressed ANC and
31     pH during snow melt. Schaefer et al. (1990) examined the same empirical relationships used
        August 1991
10-151     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 for the Adirondack lakes by Eshleman (1988; Table 10-23), and conclude that the magnitude
 of the episodes experienced by lakes depends strongly on their base cation concentration.
 They conclude that lakes with high base cation concentrations (and therefore high ANC
 values) undergo episodes that are largely the result of dilution by snow melt.  Low ANC
 lakes, on the other hand, undergo episodes that result largely from increases in NO3"
 concentrations.  At intermediate ANC levels, lakes are affected by both base cation dilution,
 and NO3" increases, and therefore these lakes may undergo the greatest increases in acidity
 during snowmelt episodes (Figure 10-26).  The relationship between spring and fall lake
 chemistry is therefore not linear, as assumed by Eshleman (1988), and the number of lakes
 that become acidic during spring episodes is probably larger than predicted in Table 10-23.
     Driscoll et al. (1989a, 1989b) report on a detailed study of nitrogen dynamics in
 Pancake-Hall Creek in the Adirondack Mountains.  This stream is highly acidic, with low
 and invariant concentrations of base cations, and high and invariant concentrations of SO42"
 (Figure 10-27).  Nitrate concentrations were lower than SO42", and exhibited a distinct
 seasonal pattern; peak concentrations approached 100 /zeq • L"1.  Short-term changes in NO3"
 were highly correlated, and chemically consistent, with changes in the concentrations of
 acidic cations (hydrogen and aluminum) (Driscoll et al.,  1989a).  As mentioned earlier, while
 dilution of base cations and increases in NO3" appear to be the primary causes of episodic
 acidification in Pancake-Hall Creek, these episodes are excursions from an already low
 baseline ANC, which can be largely attributed to high SO42' concentrations.
     Stoddard and Murdoch (1991) have  concluded that increases in NO3", base cation
 dilution, and high baseline SO42" concentrations all contribute to acidic episodes in Catskill
 Mountain  streams (Figure 10-28).  In Biscuit Brook, an intensively-studied stream in the
 CatsktUs,  concentrations of NO3" approach those of SO42" during episodes (Murdoch and
 Stoddard,  in review).  Values for the ratio of NO3" to NO3" + SO42", as presented in
 Tables 10-21 and 10-22, illustrate both the general importance of NO3" to the acid/base
 dynamics  of this stream, and the increase  in importance of NO3" during high-flow events
 (Figure 10-28).
     Researchers at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest in New Hampshire have been
studying the links between atmospheric deposition, watershed  processes, and stream water
chemistry  since 1963 (Likens et al., 1977).  In reference Watershed #6, stream water NO3"
       August 1991
                                        10-152     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
v 120l
*J
If 100-
1 80-
«p 60-
J>
cL 20'
§2 °
•s -<

•
•
• 1

i






W ' o 40 80 120 160 200 240
                                  Baseline ANC; (jieqL" )
             g ^

             ^ £.'  1
            ^>
             
-------
                                             ,  VCSQ^T,      ,^T

                                             1	J~	1	1—•—
                                            M    S     J
                                               1985
                                         THWE(monlhs)
                        1996
Figure 10-27.  Temporal patterns in the chemical characteristics of stream water at
              Pancake-Hall Creek in the Adirondacks.  Sulfate and base cation
              concentrations are relatively invariant, while NO3" concentrations
              undergo strong seasonally driven by snow melt. Increases in inorganic
              monomeric aluminum result when ANC values fall below zero.  From
              Driscoll et al. (1989a).
August 1991
10-154     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                   100
^  o
1   -5
 *  £
"£  I
*=•  s
                    0.0
                     9
                     6
                     7
                     6
                     S
                     4
                     3
                     2
                     I
                     0
           I  l  t I  •! I  I  .I—It  II I ' I  I
                                            •+—t-
                       J  FUAUJJA.SONOJ FMAUJJASONO

                                1988                   1989
Figure 10-28.  Temporal patterns in chemical characteristics of stream water at Biscuit
              Brook in the CatskiU Mountains.  AU chemical variables undergo strong
              seasonally, with strong dependence on stream discharge. Values for the
              ratio of NO3" to NO3" + SO42" approach 0.5 during episodes, and
              indicate  that NO3" is nearly as important an acidifying influence as SO4 "
              during high flow events. Data from Murdoch and Stoddard (in review).
August 1991
                         10-155      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
31
  concentrations undergo strong seasonal cycles, with peak concentrations as high as
  85 /zeq • L" .  Both NO3" and hydrogen ion concentrations increase during snow melt at
  Hubbard Brook, while SO42' concentrations decrease slightly (Johnson et al., 1981; Likens,
  1985).                                              -..-.'',
       The highest recorded NO3" concentrations in streams draining undisturbed watersheds in
  the United States come from the Great Smoky Mountains in Tennessee and North Carolina.
  Nitrate concentrations in Raven Fork (Jones et al.,  1983), Clingman's Creek, and Cosby
  Creek (Elwood et al., 1991) range from 50 to 100 /ieq • I/1, and in all cases are comparable
  to, or higher than, SO42" concentrations.  In a survey of stream chemistry at a large number
  of sites in the Smokies, Silsbee and Larson (1982) reported NO3" concentrations ranging from
  0.2 to 90 #eq . L'1; NO3~ concentrations were highest at higher elevations, and in areas of
 old-growth spruce-fir forest that have never been logged.  In many cases, NO3"
 concentrations in streams of the Smoky Mountains are higher than nitrogen concentrations  in
 deposition, suggesting both that rates of biological nitrogen uptake are low, and that
 mineralization rates are high (Joslin et al.,  1987).  Unfortunately, few data are available to
 suggest the original source of nitrogen now being mineralized in this region. Unless nitrogen
 fixation rates have been historically quite high, at least some of the NO3~ now being leaked
 from watersheds in the Smokies must have originated as atmospheric deposition.  The data of
 Silsbee and Larson (1982) suggest strongly that forest maturation is linked  to the process of
 NO3' leakage from Great Smoky Mountain watersheds; mineralization of soil nitrogen
 appears to be high only in old-growth forests (Elwood et al.,  1991).
     In Canada, the influence of NO3~ on episodic acidification is less universal. Molot
 et al. (1989) and DriscoU et al. (1989a) report on numerous episodic events in 15 streams in
 the Harp, Dickie and Plastic lake watersheds.  Most of these events were driven by base
 cation  dilution; only one event was dominated  by increases in NO3" concentration.  The
 authors conclude that NO3- plays at least a small role in most episodes, and that NO3"
 increases play a greater role in acidic systems than in non-acidic ones.
     Small increases in NO3~ concentrations during hydrologic events have been recorded at
 sites in a few remaining areas of North America, including northeastern Georgia (Buell and
Peters, 1988), where maximum concentrations  were ca. 12 /jeq • L"1.  Several studies have
reported the existence of NO3" episodes in the western United States, including the North
       August 1991
                                        10-156      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     Cascades (Loranger and Brakke, 1988), and Sierra Nevada Mountains (Melack and Stoddard,
 2     1991). In general, the maximum concentrations of NO3" observed in the West are less than
 3     15 Meq • L"1, substantially lower than in most of the eastern United States. Lakes in the
 4     mountainous West, however, tend to be much more dilute, and therefore more sensitive to
 5;  ,:.  acidic deposition than in the East.  Thirty-nine percent of lakes in the Sierra Nevada, for
 6     .example, have ANG values less than 50 jaeq • L"1, as  do 26% of the lakes in the Oregon
 7     Cascades, and 17% of the lakes in the North Cascades (Landers et al., 1987). Combined
 8    , with base cation dilution and small concentrations of SO42", the NO3" increases observed
 9     during episodes at Emerald Lake,  in the Sierra Nevada,  have been sufficient to drive ANC to
10  .   zero on two occasions in the past 4 years (Williams and Melack, in press  b).  Data from the
11     outflow at Emerald Lake in 1986 and 1987 (Figure 10-29) indicate that minimum ANC
12     values are coincident with maximum concentrations of NO3" and diluted base cation
13   ,  concentrations. It should be noted, however, that at no  time has the pH of Emerald Lake
14     fallen below 5.5,  a level commonly considered the threshold for injury to fish populations,
15     and that ANC values of zero can be caused by base cation dilution alone (a natural process).
16     The state of episodic acidification in the Sierra (and the rest of the West)  remains therefore
17     uncertain, because few data exist and the data that are available indicate ANC depressions to
18   ,  a value of 0-#eq • L"1, but not below.
19           Finally, there are some areas of North America  where no  significant affect of NO3~ on
20     episodic acidification has been observed.  Morgan and Good (1988) report data on 10 streams
21     in the New Jersey Pine Barrens, and found mean annual NO3~ greater than 1 /aeq • L"  only
22     in disturbed streams  (in residential and agricultural watersheds).  Swistock et al. (1989) and
23     Sharpe et al. (1984,  1987, 1989) reported data on episodic acidification of several streams in
24     the Laurel Hill area of southwestern Pennsylvania and found that NO3" played only a minor
25     role in stream acidification and fish kills.  Baird et al. (1987) examined episodic acidification
26     during snow melt at Cone Pond, New Hampshire, and were unable to detect any NO3~ in
27     inlet water.  Cosby et al. (1991) have examined 7 years of data from two streams in Virginia,
28     and found no evidence of NO3" episodes; NO3" concentrations are always less than 15 /zeq  •
29     L"1 in these streams.  Swank and Waide (1988) reported data from 7 undisturbed watersheds
30   ,  . at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory in North Carolina, where ,the volume-weighted mean
31
concentrations of NO3" were less than 1.5 jueq • L
                                              -1
        August 1991
                                        10-157     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                             Emerald Lake, Sierra Nevada, California
            cr
            CD
           a   e-
           ^   6-
            c
            £D
            O
            cr
            o
           O
9

6<

3-

0-
                   i  i  i  i  t  I
                     cr
                      1986
                hw'A'M'j
                   1987
                              2-

                             1.5-


                             0.5-
                             •
                              0
                                (   I  (IT  I
                                            60-

                                            45-

                                            30-
'F'M'A'M'J
    1986
                                                                 i  i   r
                                                               1987
Figure 10-29.  Outflow chemistry from two snowmelt seasons (1986 and 1987) at
              Emerald Lake, a high elevation lake in the Sierra Nevada mountains of
              California. Nitrate episodes are smaller in magnitude than at sites in the
              eastern United States, but western lakes may be more susceptible to
              episodic acidification because of their lower baseline acid neutralizing
              capacity than most eastern lakes.
August 1991
                      10-158     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1          Some broad geographic patterns in the frequency of episodes in the United States are
 2     now evident.  Acidic episodes driven by NO3~ are apparently common in the Adirondack and
 3     Catskill Mountains of New York, especially during snow melt, and also occur in at least
 4     some streams in other portions of the Northeast (e.g., at Hubbard Brook).  Nitrate contributes
 5     on a smaller scale to episodes  in Ontario, and may play some role in episodic acidification in
 6     the western United States.  There is little current evidence that NO3" episodes are important
 7     in the acid-sensitive portions of the southeastern United States outside of the Great Smoky
 8     Mountains., We have no information on the importance of NO3~ in driving episodes in many
 9     of the subregions covered by the NSS, including those that exhibited elevated NO3"
10     concentrations at spring baseflow (e.g., the Valley and Ridge Province and Mid-Atlantic
11     Coastal Plain), because temporally-intensive studies have not been published for these areas.
12           As was the case with chronic acidification discussed earlier, the mere presence of NO3~
13     in acidic episodes should not be construed as proof that nitrogen deposition is having an
14     acidifying effect on surface waters; many other sources of nitrogen exist in watersheds.
15     There is currently little direct evidence linking nitrogen deposition with those acidic episodes
16     that are driven by increases in NO3"  concentrations, at least  partially because the type of data
17     necessary to link deposition to stream water pulses of NO3~  are extremely  difficult to collect.
18     High concentrations of NO3~ during  snow melt may simply result when NO3" stored in the
19     snow pack during the winter months is released while the forest is still dormant.  The reduced
20     biological activity typical of the winter months creates less demand for nitrogen, and
21     snowpack NO3" may simply runoff without entering the nitrogen, cycle of the forest or
22     watershed.  Several mechanisms, however, will amplify the signal produced by atmospheric
23     deposition of nitrogen to snow packs.  In areas with large snow packs (e.g., much of the
24     Northeast and all of the mountainous West) ions have been shown to drain from the pack in
25     the early stages of snow melt, leading to concentrations that are much higher than the average
26     concentration of the snowpack itself (e.g.,  Jeffries, 1990).  This differential elution of acid
27     anions (like NO3") during the'initial  stages of snow melt has been shown to be responsible for
28      the elevated NO3" concentrations observed in parts of Scandinavia (Johannessen and
29      Henriksen, 1978), Canada (Jeffries^  1990), the Adirondacks (Mollitor and Raynal, 1982),  the
30      Midwest (Cadle  et al., 1984), and in the Sierra Nevada (Williams and Melack, in press  b).
31      Ammonium deposited to the snowpack as either wet or dry  deposition can be subsequently
       • August 1991
10-159      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     nitrified to NO3" in soils, or while still in the snowpack, and produce NO3" concentrations
  2     elevated over those calculated from NO3" deposition alone (Galloway et a!.,  1980; Schofield
  3     et al., 1985; Cadle et al., 1987; Schaefer and Driscoll, in press).  Rates of dry deposition of
  4     nitrogen compounds to the snowpack are difficult to measure, but potentially important,
  5     controls on NO3" concentrations in snowmelt water (Galloway et al.,  1980; Cadle et al.,
  6     1987). Jeffries (1990) presents a recent review of snowpack storage and release of pollutants
  7     during snow melt.
  8          Some evidence does exist that mechanisms other than atmospheric deposition contribute
  9     to NO3" episodes, at least on a small scale.  Rascher et al.  (1987), for example, have shown
 10     that mineralization of organic matter in the soil during the winter months,  and  subsequent
 11   • nitrification, contribute substantially to snowmelt NO3" concentrations at one site in the
 12     Adirondacks. Schaefer and Driscoll (in press) have suggested that a similar phenomenon
 13     contributes to NO3" pulses during snow melt at 11 Adirondack lakes, and that the
 14     contribution from mineralization is greater in low ANC and acidic lakes.  Stottlemyer and
 15     ToczydlowsM (1990) also report that mineralization contributes to snowmelt NO3" at a site on
 16     the upper peninsula of Michigan. It is not currently known how widespread  this phenomenon
 17     is. Murdoch and Stoddard (in review) conclude that mineralization probably does not
 18     contribute substantially to NO3" episodes in the Catskill Mountains, because maximum NO3"
 19     concentrations are very similar among a large number of streams; mineralization rates are
20     expected to differ among watersheds, and would produce variability in concentrations of
21      NO3" among streams. There also remains some question of whether NO3" produced from
22     mineralization none-the-less  results from atmospheric deposition because mineralization
23      recycles nitrogen from leaf litter.  Mineralization during the winter may simply recycle
24      nitrogen from the leaf fall of the previous autumn; some portion of the nitrogen incorporated
25      into leaves in the summer undoubtedly  originates as atmospheric deposition.  In addition,
26      chronic nitrogen deposition has probably contributed to forest growth in the past (through
27      fertilization), and nitrogen now being mineralized may be the result of such "excess" storage
28      of nitrogen in forest biomass.
29          Earlier in this document (see Section 10.6.2.3) it was suggested that the severity and
30      duration of NO3" episodes can be expected to increase as forests become more nitrogen
31      sufficient (see also Driscoll and Schaefer, 1989; Stoddard and Murdoch, 1991). Some of the
       August 1991
10-160     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      best information on whether atmospheric deposition is contributing to NO3" episodes may
 2      therefore come from an examination of long-term trends in surface water NO3"
 3      concentrations.
 4           There is some evidence that the occurrence and severity of NO3" episodes are
 5      increasing.  Smith et al. (1987a) examined trends in NO3" at 383 stream locations in the
 6      United States between 1974 and  1981, and reported increases at 167 sites,  especially east of
 7      the 100th meridian. Many of the increasing trends could be attributed to increased use of
 8      fertilizers in agricultural areas, particularly in the Midwest.  In addition to agricultural
 9      runoff, Smith et al. (1987a) identify atmospheric deposition as a major source of NO3" in
10      surface waters, particularly in forested basins of the East (e.g., New England and the Mid-
11      Atlantic) and Upper Midwest.  Despite widespread use of fertilizers in most of the regions
12      covered by the Smith et' al. study, they found a high degree of correlation  between stream
13      basin yield of NO3" and rates of nitrogen deposition.
14           Historical  data are available from 19 large streams in the Catskill Mountains, some of
15      which have been monitored since early in this century (Stoddard and Murdoch, 1991;
16      Stoddard, in review).  Trend analyses indicate that NO3" concentrations have increased in all
17      of the streams (Table 10-24), with the majority of the increase occurring in the past two
18      decades (Murdoch and  Stoddard, in review;  Stoddard, in review). These increases are not
19      attributable to other anthropogenic sources of nitrogen, and are similar to trends observed in
20      8 headwaters streams monitored in the 1980s (Murdoch and Stoddard, in press; Murdoch and
21      Stoddard, in review).  At four historical Catskill sites where stream discharge data are
22      available,' the relationships between NO3" concentration and discharge have changed over the
23      course of the past 4 decades (Figure 10-30).  In all cases, the relationships are steeper in the
24      1980s than in the past,  indicating that most of the increase in NO3" has occurred at high
25      flows (i.e., episodic NO3" concentrations have increased more than baseflow NO3"
26      concentrations).
27           Trends in  lake'water NO3" concentrations that are similar to the Catskill stream trends
28      have been reported for Adirondack lakes (Table 10-25; Driscoll et al., in review).  Nine out
29      of seventeen Adirondack lakes exhibited significant increases in NO3~ concentrations, while
30      only one exhibited a significant decrease (Table 10-25).  It is not statistically possible to
31      determine whether episodic NO3" concentrations are mostly responsible for the trends in
        August 1991
10-161
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
     TABLE 10-24. SLOPES OF NITRATE TRENDS (/Lteq-JL^-yr^) IN CATSKILL
  STREAMS BEFORE 1945, BETWEEN 1945 AND 1970, AND AFTER 1970. SLOPES
  FOR EACH PERIOD ARE CALCULATED FROM BEST-FIT REGRESSION LINES
 (ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE ON RANKS, SEE TEXT FOR DETAILS) FITTED TO
      DATA FROM THE ENTIRE PERIOD OF RECORD.  ALL TRENDS ARE
  SIGNIFICANT AT P <0.05.  MEDIAN VALUES AND SAMPLE SIZES FOR EACH
    PERIOD ARE GIVEN IN PARENTHESES.  [-- = DATA INSUFFICIENT FOR
         ANALYSIS.] FROM MURDOCH AND STODDARD (IN REVIEW)
Site
Batavia Kill

Bear Kill above Grand Gorgeb

Bear Kill above Hardenbergh Falls

Beaver Kill"

Birch Creek above Pine Hill

Birch Creek at Pine Hill

Bush Kill •_

Eushncllville Creek8

Esopus Creek above Big Indian

Esopus Creek below Big Indian

Esopus Creek at Coldbrook
- ,
Little Beaver Kill8
,
Manor Kill

Nevcrsink River

Rondout Creek

Schohario Creek at Praltsville

Stony Clove Creek"

West Kill

Woodland Creek8


Before 1945
+0.24
(11, n=235)
_

+0.34
(18, n=253)
+0.05
(4, n=270)
—

-0.01
(11, n=287)
+0.11
(4, n=235)
+0.04
(4, n=267)
+0.08
(4, n=246)
-0.16
;(7, n=59)
+0.24
(7, n=352)
+0.00
(4, n=268)
-0.12
(11, n=251)
_

—

+0.64
(7,n=238)
-0.00
(4, n=272)
+0.19
(7, n=227)
+0.02
(4, n=272)
Change in Nitrate Concentration
-'• '1945-1970' , "
' +0.21

_
(27, n=9)
_

+0.10

+0.60
:>, , (4, n=12)
+0.68
(6, n=ll)
' +0.00
•(7, n=248)
+0.25

	

-0.01
(7, n=64)
-0.08
(11, n=784)
+0.01 • -

'' - -0.55
(14, n=306)
+0.33
(7, n=185)
+0.00
(7,n=12)
-0.13 ,'-.-,
(14, n=712)
+0.08

•

+0.08


After 1970
+0.28
(21, n=70)
+0.70
(38,n=92)
_

+ 1.76
(14, n=10)
+2.68
(16, n=75)
+0.73
(19 n=63)
+2.28
(19, n=94)
+ 1.57
(17, n=10) ,
_

+1:98
(21, n=93)
+2.00
(19, n=886)
+0.85
(5, n=10)
+0.97
(17, n=96)
+ 1.28
(14, n=104)
+ 1.79
(8, n=43)
, + 1,93
(21, n=805)
+3.77 "
(24, n=10)


. +3.95
(25, n=10)
*0aia for these sites are available only for periods before 1945 and from 1977-79. Trends reported for the periods of missing data are
based on regression lines for the entire data set; median values cannot be listed.
Data available, for fewer than 2 years in one or more time periods at this site. Trends were not calculated during these time periods at this
site, but median values and sample sizes are listed.                                         .
August 1991
10-162     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                   Schoharie Creek at Prattsville
                                                               Neversink River at Claryvllle
      1      10     100
Stream Discharge  (m sec )
                                                                                 100
                                                              Stream Discharge  (m  sec  )
                    Esopus Creek at Coldbrook
                     11 ml	1—i i 11 nil—^—i i i mil
                                           Rondout Cr«ek at Lowes Cornere
                                                                                     19SO-S9
                  Stream Discharge
                                           Stream Discharge  (rn sec  )
      Figure 10-30.  Relationship between nitrate concentration and stream discharge for four
                     Catskill streams during four most recent decades: (a) Schoharie Creek at
                     Prattsville, (b) Neversink River at Prattsville, (c) Rondout Creek at
                     Lowes Corners, and (d) Esopus Creek at Coldbrook.  Regression lines for
                     each decade  are from least-squares regression of concentration on the log
                     of stream discharge, and all regressions are significant (p < 0.05).  All
                     sites indicate that NO3" concentrations at high discharges are higher in
                     the 1970s and 1980s than in previous decades.  From Murdoch and
                     Stoddard (in review).
1     Adirondack lakes, because the data record is short (1982-89).  Plots of temporal NO3"
2     patterns, however, suggest that baseflow values are relatively unchanged, while spring values
3     are increasing (Figure 10-31).
4           A cautionary note in the interpretation of long-term nitrogen trends is introduced by
5     examination of long-term data from streams at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest
6     (HBEF).  Data from control Watershed #6 through 1977 suggested  a strongly increasing trend
      August 1991
                             10-163
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   TABLE 10-25.  TRENDS IN NITRATE CONCENTRATIONS FOR ADIRONDACK
    LONG-TERM MONITORING LAKES. SLOPES ARE CALCULATED FROM
 BEST-FIT REGRESSION LINES (USING ANCOVA ON RANKS; LOFTIS et aL, 1989)
      FITTED TO DATA. DATA ARE FROM DRISCOLL et al. (IN REVIEW)
Lake Name
Arbutus Lake
Barnes Lake
Big Moose Lake
Black Lake
Bubb Lake
Cascade Lake
Clear Pond
Constable Pond
Dart Lake
Heart Lake
Lake Rondaxe
Little Echo Pond
Moss Lake
Otter Pond
Squash Pond
West Pond
Windfall Lake
na
96
51
105
104
88
105
104
106
88
103
88
84
105
93
100
106
88
Change in NO3-b
Ofeq-L^-yr'1)
+ 1.05
+0.03
+0.16
+0.04
-0.11
-0.50
+0.51
+ 1.26
+0.34
+0.88
+0.18 " ;
+0.01
0.00
+ 1.50
' +1.14
+0.09
-0.14
Pc
< 0.0001
0.69
0.36
0.79
0.53
0.04
< 0.0001
0.0003
, 0.07
< 0.0001
0.04
0.12
0.94 -
< 0.0001
0.08
0.56
0.82
"Number of individual observations; the period of record for most sites is from June, 1982, to August, 1989.
bSlope of ANCOVA model. Positive slope indicates an increase in NO3", negative number indicates decrease.
"Significance of regression coefficient for date in ANCOVA model.
August 1991
10-164     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
           cr
           v
           a.
           n
           o
                       -  -  TREND IN ALL DMA
                             TREND IN SPWNG DATA
          L
           cr
          1
-  -   TREND W ALL DATA
      TREND IN SPRING DATA
                    1982  1983  1984  1985   1986   1987  1988  1989
      Figure 10-31. Temporal patterns in lake water NO3" concentration for two Adirondack
                   lakes, (a) Constable Pond, and (b) Heart Lake.  Both sites exhibit
                   increasing trends in NO3" (Table 10-25). The strongly seasonal behavior
                   of NO3" hi these lakes suggests that most of the increase has occurred in
                   spring episodic NO3" concentrations.
1     in NO3" (Schindler, 1987), and have been used to suggest that the HBEF watersheds are
2     undergoing nitrogen saturation (Agren and Bosatta, 1988).  Examination of the entire 23-year
3     record (1965-1983) from Watershed #6, however, shows no long-term trend (Likens, 1985;
4     Driscoll et al.,  1989a), and emphasizes the importance of examining nitrogen processes in a
      August 1991
                      10-165     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1      truly long-term context.  Pools of nitrogen associated with soils and forests at HBEF, and
  2      elsewhere, are very large (ca.  340,000 moles/ha at HBEF, up to 520,000 moles/ha at other
  3      sites in the eastern United States; Federer et al., 1989) and long-lived (the turnover rate for
  4      nitrogen at HBEF is estimated at 80 years); small changes in the long-term cycling of
  5      nitrogen within this system will have profound effects on stream water chemistry (Driscoll
  6      et al., 1989a).  While the data reported here for the Catskills can be considered truly
  7      long-term (up to 65 years of record), data for the Adirondacks (Driscoll et al., in review) and
  8      other areas of the United States (Smith et al., 1987a) span only one to two decades,  and
  9      should be interpreted with caution.
10           Many of the data discussed above suggest that NO3" episodes are more severe now than
11      they were in the past.  These surface water nitrogen increases have occurred at a time when
12      nitrogen deposition has been relatively unchanged in the northeastern United States (Husar,
13      1986; Simpson  and Olsen, 1990; Bowersox et al., 1990).  If we accept the idea that an
14      increase in the occurrence of NO3" episodes is  evidence that nitrogen saturation of watersheds
15      is progressing, then current data suggest that current levels of nitrogen deposition
16      (350-700 eq • ha"1 • yr"1) are too high the for the long-term health of aquatic systems in the
17      Adirondacks, the Catskills, and possibly elsewhere in the Northeast.  It is important to note
18      that this supposition is dependent on our acceptance of NO3" episodes as evidence of nitrogen
19      saturation.  At this point no measurements of changes in nitrogen cycling  have been  made to
20      support this.
21           Similar logic would suggest that levels of nitrogen deposition in the  Sierra Nevada
22      (ca. 150 eq •  ha"1 •  yr"1) may be at the upper limit of the levels that would be protective of
23      the long-term health of sensitive aquatic systems in the West.  The discrepancy between the
24      levels of nitrogen deposition that produce signs of nitrogen saturation in the Northeast and the
25      West is a good  illustration of the need to set deposition levels in terms of a "critical  load" to
26      specific systems.  The deposition levels measured in the eastern and western United States are
27      within the range of nitrogen critical loads (210 to 1,000 eq • ha"1 • yr"1) suggested by
28      European work in regions of silicate soils of varying sensitivity (Schulze et al., 1989).  The
29      Northeast, because of deeper soils and aggrading forests, may be able to absorb higher rates
30      of deposition  without serious damage than areas of the mountainous West, where soils are
31      thin and forests are often absent. The abilities of these regions to absorb  nitrogen is a
        August 1991
10-166
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     function of the capacities of their watersheds to retain nitrogen. Because these capacities
 2     differ from one region to another, the critical loads of nitrogen that will produce signs of
 3     degradation also vary from region to region.  These differences are at the heart of the critical
 4     loads concept of setting deposition limits.
 5        ,         .         ....
 6     10.6.3.3  Biological Effects
 7  .  ..       In addition to affecting acid/base chemistry, there is considerable evidence that episodic
 8     events affect biological systems.  J.  Baker et al.  (1989) have reviewed the scientific evidence
 9     of biological effects attributable to surface water acidification, and have documented evidence
10     of:  (1) fish kills during spring episodes in Norwegian rivers; (2)  loss of stocked trout from
11     re-apidifying Adirondack lakes after liming; (3) decreased density of acid-sensitive benthic
12     invertebrates in whole stream experiments simulating episodic acidification; and (4)  loss of
13     acid-sensitive mayfly and stonefly species  from two Ontario stream sites experiencing acidic
14  . • • .episodes..       ,                                  .           ,
15           Although biological responses  to acidification are complex,, research over the past
16     , decade has provided us with a strong understanding of the relationship between changes in
17     surface water chemistry associated with acidification and responses in biological communities.
18     In short, shifts in water chemistry during acidification can affept biological communities and
19     .processes both directly (e.g., physiological stress, toxicity)  and indirectly (e.g., changes in
20     food availability, predation).  From a biological perspective,  changes in several ions (e.g.,
21     hydrogen, aluminum, and calcium), not just pH, are important. The scientific literature
22     contains a number of comprehensive reviews  of acidification  effects on aquatic biota (cf.,
23     National Research Council Canada,  1981; Altshuller and Linthurst, 1984; Baker and
24  ..;•• Christensen, 1991; J. Baker et al., 1989); interested readers are referred to these documents
25     for detailed description of the state-of-science.
26  ;                ,  .                             .                            •
27     10.6.4 The Effects of Nitrogen Deposition on Eutrophication
28           The term  "eutrophy" generally refers to a state of nutrient enrichment (Wetzel, 1983),
29     but is commonly used to refer to conditions of increased algal biomass and productivity,
30     presence of nuisance algal populations, and a decrease in oxygen availability for heterotrophic
31     organisms.  "Eutrophication" is the process whereby lakes, estuaries and marine systems
        August 1991
10-167
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     progress toward a state of eutrophy. In lakes, eutrophication is often considered to be a
  2     natural process, progressing gradually over the long-term evolution of lakes.  The process can
  3     be significantly accelerated by the additional input of nutrients from anthropogenic sources.
  4     The subject of eutrophication has been extensively reviewed by Hutchinson (1973), the
  5     National Research Council (1969), and Likens (1972).
  6          Establishing a link between nitrogen deposition and the eutrophication of aquatic
  7     systems depends on a determination of two key conditions.  The first condition is that the
  8     productivity of the system is limited by nitrogen availability. Our current concept of nutrient
  9     limitation stems from Liebig's Law of the Minimum (von Liebig, 1840), which can be
 10     paraphrased to suggest that, at any single point in time, ecosystem productivity will be
 11     limited by whatever necessary environmental element is in shortest supply.  When that
 12     necessary environmental element is nitrogen, then the system can be  said to be nitrogen
 13     limited.  The second condition is that nitrogen deposition be a major source of nitrogen to the
 14     system.  In many cases, the supply of nitrogen from deposition is minor when compared to
 15     other anthropogenic sources, such as pollution from either point or non-point  sources.
 16
 17     10.6.4.1  Freshwater Eutrophication
 18          It is generally accepted that the productivity of fresh waters is limited by the availability
 19     of phosphorus, rather than the availability of nitrogen (reviewed by Hecky and Kilham,
20     1988).  While conditions of nitrogen limitation do occur in freshwater systems (discussed
21     below), they are often either transitory, or the result of high inputs of phosphorus from
22     anthropogenic sources. At high rates of phosphorus input, phosphorus will cease to be in
23     short supply, and whatever nutrient is then least abundant (often nitrogen) will become
24     limiting.   While additions of nitrogen from deposition will lead to increased productivity in
25     these situations, the primary dysfunction is an excess supply of phosphorus, and these
26     situations will not be discussed further.  Often when  nitrogen limitation does occur it is a
27     short-lived phenomenon, because nitrogen-deficient conditions favor the growth of blue-green
28     algae (e.g., Smith, 1982), many of which are capable of nitrogen fixation.  Because
29     nitrogen-fixing species are not limited by the availability of fixed nitrogen (e.g.,  NH4+,
30     NO3~), they may thrive under conditions where other species are nitrogen limited, and
31      effectively increase rates of nitrogen input to the system by fixation of gaseous nitrogen.
        August 1991
10-168      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      High rates of nitrogen fixation may lead to situations where nitrogen can no longer be said to
 2      be limiting,  and the system often returns to a state of phosphorus limitation; In lakes,
 3      nitrogen fixation may be considered a natural mechanism which compensates for deficiencies
 4      in nitrogen,  and contributes to the long-term evolution and ubiquity of phosphorus limitation
 5      (Schindler,  1977).
 6           Nitrogen limitation can occur naturally (i.e., in the absence of anthropogenic
 7      phosphorus  inputs) in lakes with very low concentrations of both nitrogen  and phosphorus, as
 8      are common in the western United States, and in the Northeast (Suttle and Harrison, 1988).
 9      Suttle and Harrison (1988) and Stockner and Shortreed (1988) have suggested that phosphorus
10     concentrations are too low in these systems to allow blue-green algae to thrive, because they
11      are poor competitors  for phosphorus at very low concentrations (e.g., Schindler et al., 1980;
12     Smith and Kalff, 1982). Thus, diatom communities dominate phytoplankton and periphyton
13     communities in these extremely nutrient-poor (ultraoligotrophic) systems,  and rates of
14     nitrogen fixation do not increase because blue-green algae do not become  established,
15     regardless of relative nitrogen or phosphorus deficiency.  In these  systems, the two nutrients
16     are often closely coupled and constant shifts between nitrogen and phosphorus deficiency may
17     occur without obvious changes in community structure.  In these situations, additional loading
18     of nitrogen from anthropogenic deposition is likely to have only a small effect on primary
19     productivity because  the system quickly becomes phosphorus limited.  In  a literature survey
20     of 62 separate nutrient limitation studies in lakes, Elser et al.  (1990) found that simultaneous
21     additions of nitrogen and phosphorus produced the largest growth  response in 82%  of the
22      experiments.  These  results underline the likelihood that a lake limited by one nutrient may
23      quickly become limited by another if the lake becomes enriched with the  original limiting
24      nutrient.
25           Estimations of nutrient limitation in lake ecosystems follow three major lines of
26      reasoning:  (1) evidence from ambient nutrient  concentrations and the nutritional needs of
27      algae;  (2) evidence from bioassay experiments at various scales; and (3) evidence from
 28      nutrient dynamics and  input/output studies (Hecky and Kilham, 1988; Howarth,  1988).
 29           Much of the acceptance of the idea that freshwater lakes are primarily phosphorus
 30      limited stems from the close correlations between phosphorus concentrations and lake
 31      productivity or algal biomass (usually measured as chlorophyll concentration) that have been
        August 1991
10-169      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      observed in a large number of lake studies (e.g., Dillon and Rigler,  1974; Schindler, 1977,
 2      1978; reviewed by Reynolds, 1984; Peters, 1986).  More recently, researchers have begun to
 3      question the ubiquity of the phosphonisxhlorophyll relationship, and to identify some of the
 4      factors that lead to the large variability observed in this relationship in nature (e.g., Smith
 5      and Shapiro, 1981; Smith, 1982; Pace, 1984; Hoyer and Jones, 1983; Prairie et al., 1989).
 6      Notably, researchers have found that the relationship is not linear, as previously supposed,
 7      but sigmoidal (McCauley et al., 1989), and that the slope of the relationship is significantly
 8      affected by nitrogen concentrations, particularly at high concentrations of phosphorus
 9      (> 10 /ieq • L"1) that are likely to be caused by anthropogenic inputs.  McCauley et al.
10      (1989) found that nitrogen had little effect on the phosphorus:chlorophyll relationship at low
11      concentrations of phosphorus.  This effect is expected in nutrient-poor lakes where the
12      primary effect of nitrogen additions would be to push lakes into a phosphorus-deficient
13      condition.
14           Arguments based on ambient nutrient concentrations stem from the early work of
15      Redfield (1934), who examined the concentrations of nutrients within the cells of nutrient-
16      sufficient algae from marine systems worldwide, and found surprisingly consistent results for
17      the ratio of carbon to nitrogen to phosphorus concentrations (106:16:1); deviations from these
18      ratios are taken to be evidence that one nutrient or another is limiting to algal growth (e.g.,
19      N:P ratio values below 16:1 suggest nitrogen limitation; values above  16:1 suggest
20      phosphorus limitation). Because the relative supply rates of phosphorus and nitrogen will
21      determine whether one or the other nutrient is in short supply, it has been suggested that the
22      ratio of the two nutrients  (i.e., total nitrogen:total phosphorus)  can be used as an index of
23      nutrient limitation (Chiandani and Vighi,  1974; Rhee,  1978; Schindler, 1976, 1977, 1978).
24      Various researchers  have extended interpretation of the Redfield ratio to include ambient
25      nutrient concentrations in water (Redfield's original work was with intracellular
26      concentrations), and applied the nutrient ratio criteria to waters supplying lakes to determine
27      the likely limiting conditions that these waters will produce (e.g.,  Schindler,  1977;  Smith and
28      Shapiro, 1981; Prairie et al., 1989). This method has the potential to illustrate regional
29      patterns and has gained some support from the results of bioassay experiments (see below).
30      This idea has been refined recently to exclude from the ratio those forms of nitrogen and
31      phosphorus that are  not biologically available (e.g., especially organic forms of nitrogen),
        August 1991
10-170      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     with the result that good predictions of nutrient limitation can now be made from ratios of
 2     total inorganic nitrogen (DIN) to total phosphorus (TP) (Morris and Lewis,  1988).
 3          Morris and Lewis (1988) conducted nutrient addition bioassays on natural assemblages
 4     of phytoplankton from many lakes, and compared their results to DIN:TP values measured in
 5     the lakes at the same time as the experiments were conducted.  They found that lakes with
 6     DINrTP values less than 9 (using molar concentrations) could be limited by either nitrogen or
 7     phosphorus (often additions of both nutrients were required to stimulate growth), while lakes
 8     with DIN:TP values less than 2 were always limited by nitrogen.  The discrepancy between
 9     the 16:1 Redfield ratio, and the 2:1 ratio suggested  by Morris and Lewis (1988), may result
10     from measuring ambient, rather and cellular, nutrient  concentrations, and from the variety of
11     critical N:P ratios exhibited by different species in nature (Suttle and Harrison, 1988).
12          If a critical DIN:TP value less than 2 is applied  to lakes from the Eastern Lake Survey
13     (Linthurst et al., 1986) and Western Lake Survey (Landers et al., 1987), it is possible  to
14     estimate the number of nitrogen limited lakes in some regions of the United States
15     (Table 10-26).  Lakes with total phosphorus concentrations greater than 2.0 /zeq • L"1 have
16     been excluded from this analysis because many of them may have experienced anthropogenic
17     inputs of phosphorus (Vollenweider, 1968; Wetzel,  1983).  This test is therefore a
18     conservative one for nitrogen limitation, both because the DINrTP value chosen (< 2) is a
19     conservative measure of nitrogen limitation (Morris and Lewis, 1988), and because some
20     lakes with  naturally high concentrations of phosphorus may be excluded; these lakes are more
21     likely to be nitrogen-limited than lakes with low phosphorus concentrations.  The proportions
22     Of lakes that can be considered nitrogen-limited vary widely from region to  region,  with the
23     greatest number being found, as expected, in the West.  The highest proportion was found in
24     the Pacific Northwest (27.7% of lakes exhibited low DINrTP ratios), but all sub-regions of
25     the West contained substantial numbers of nitrogen-limited lakes.  The smallest proportions
26     were found in the Southeast (2.5% of the lakes in the entire region exhibited low DIN:TP
27     ratios) and the Northeast (5%). One surprise in this analysis is the number of lakes in the
28     Upper Midwest that appear to be nitrogen-limited; taken as a whole, this region had 19%  of
29     its lakes with DIN: TP ratios less than one.
30          A more direct indication of nutrient limitation than is available from nutrient ratios can
31     be gained from bioassay experiments, where a small volume of natural lake water is
        August 1991
10-171
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
    TABLE 10-26. ESTIMATED NUMBER AND PROPORTION OF NITROGEN-
 LIMITED LAKES IN SUBREGIONS OF THE UNITED STATES SAMPLED BY THE
 NATIONAL SURFACE WATER SURVEY.  ESTIMATES ARE BASED ON MOLAR
 RATIOS OF TOTAL INORGANIC NITROGEN CONCENTRATIONS (NITRATE +
         AMMONIUM) TO TOTAL PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATIONS
Sub-Region
Eastern Lake Surveya
Adirondacks (1A)
Poconos/CatsMUs (IB)
Central New England (1C)
Southern New England (ID)
Northern New England (IE)
Northeastern Minnesota (2A)
Upper Peninsula, Michigan (2B)
Northcentral Wisconsin (2C)
Upper Great Lakes Area (2D)
Southern Blue Ridge (3A)
Florida (3B)
Western Lake Surveyb
California (4A)
Pacific Northwest (4B)
Northern Rockies (4C)
Central Rockies (4D)
Southern Rockies (4E)
Number of
Lakes in
Sub-Region

1,684
1,986
2,003
2,667
2,388
2,132
1,698
1,707
6,147
538
8,053

2,806
2,200
3,335
2,970
2,195
Estimated Number
of Nitrogen
Limited Lakes

16.4
228.5
54.9
144.7
91.3
316.2
305.8
248.2
1345.4
11.5
2.5

535.8
609.1
739.9
788.7
455.2
Proportion
of Population
N-Limited (%)

1.0
11.5
2.7
5.4
3.8
14.8
18.0
14.5
21.9
2.1
0.0

19.1
27.7
22.2
26.6
20.7
"Data from Kanciruk et al. (1986); excluding lakes with total phosphorus > 2 //mol • L'.
"Data from Eilers et al. (1987); excluding lakes with total phosphorus > 2 jumol • L"1.
August 1991
10-172    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     enclosed, and various known concentrations of potentially limiting nutrients are added (e.g.,
 2     Melack etal.,  1982; Setaro and Melack, 1984; Stoddard, 1987b).  A growth response
 3     (usually measured as an increase in biomass) in treatments containing an added nutrient
 4     constitutes evidence of limitation by that nutrient.  The results of such experiments are
 5     available for only a.few selected nutrient-poor lakes, however, and indicate a variety of
 6     responses including strong phosphorus limitation (Melack et al., 1987), limitation by
 7     phosphorus and iron (Stoddard, 1987b), simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus limitation
 8     (i.e., the two nutrients are so closely balanced that addition of one alone simply leads to
 9     limitation by the other, Gerhart and Likens, 1975; Suttle and Harrison, 1988; Dodds and
10     Priscu, 1990), and limitation primarily by nitrogen (Morris  and Lewis, 1988; Goldman,
11     1988). No clear pattern of nitrogen or phosphorus limitation develops from an examination
12     of these few studies.                                                  .
13           The potential for nitrogen deposition to contribute to the eutrophication of freshwater
14     lakes is probably quite limited. Eutrophication by nitrogen  inputs will only  be a concern in
15     lakes that are chronically nitrogen-limited.   This condition occurs in some lakes that receive
16     substantial inputs of anthropogenic phosphorus, and in many lakes where both phosphorus
17     and nitrogen are found in low concentrations (e.g., Table 10-26).  In the former case, the
18     primary dysfunction of the lakes is an excess supply of phosphorus,  and controlling nitrogen
19     deposition would be an ineffective method of water quality improvement. In the latter case,
20     the potential for eutrophication by nitrogen  addition (e.g., from deposition)  is  limited by low
21     phosphorus concentrations; additions of nitrogen to these systems would soon lead to
22     nitrogen-sufficient, and phosphorus-deficient, conditions. Increases  in nitrogen deposition to
23     some of the regions in Table 10-25 would probably lead to  measurable increases in algal
24     biomass  in those lakes with low DIN:TP ratios and substantial total  phosphorus
25     concentrations, but the number of lakes that meet these criteria is  likely to be  quite small.
26
27     10.6.4.2  Estuaries and Coastal Waters
28           Estuarine and coastal water ecosystems exist at the transition between freshwater
29     systems and the open ocean.  These transition zones share some characteristics with
30     freshwater and marine systems, but they also have some unique properties that lead to
31     different responses to nitrogen oxide deposition and a correspondingly different set of
        August 1991
10-173     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     concerns.  They are at the end of a long series of nitrogen transport and transformation
  2     processes involving interactions with vegetation, soils, groundwater, small streams, lakes, and
  3     rivers.  At each step in this series the processes vary temporally and spatially and may be
  4     subject to a variety of human influences. This transition zone integrates complex and
  5     fluctuating processes which are distributed over what are sometimes very large watersheds.
  6          The transition zones between fresh and salt water systems are subject to natural
  7     processes which are not observed elsewhere in aquatic systems, such as tidal flows and
  8     salinity changes.  They are also subject to substantial human influence. Estuaries provided
  9     natural ports and are among the most productive ecosystems on the planet (Begon et al.,
 10     1986). Thus they became an obvious location for cities, with accompanying demands for
 11     waste water disposal.  The history of human use of estuaries and lands around estuaries make
 12     it more difficult to isolate the effects of a particular anthropogenic contaminant on ecosystem
 13     characteristics.  The conservative approach used above to assess the impact of nitrogen
 14     deposition on freshwater eutrophication (excluding all systems with anthropogenic impacts
 15     other than atmospheric deposition) is not possible for estuaries and coastal waters; all
 16     estuarine systems, and most coastal  waters, have been subjected to human impacts, often for
 17     several centuries.
 18          Estuaries are bodies of water,  more or less isolated from the rest of the ocean, where
 19     fresh water and salt water mix.  This generally produces a salinity gradient* and often leads
20     to stratification of water with the heavier salt water below a layer of fresh water. Estuaries
21      are also subject to tidal effects and may be strongly influenced by river flows.  In
22     combination these forces tend to produce quite complex water circulation patterns with
23      significant biological consequences.  For example, water currents within  Chesapeake Bay
24     concentrate and circulate the dinoflagellate, Gyrodinium uncatenum, responsible for red  tides
25      in that estuary (Tyler etal., 1982).  Circulation patterns within estuaries  may also influence
26     patterns of habitat use by fish (e.g., Pietrafesa et al.,  1986).
27           Boynton et al. (1982) described a classification of estuaries into four categories that
28      were designed to reflect the primary factors influencing algal production, and the variability
29      which exists among estuaries:
30           • Fjords have deep basin waters and shallow underwater sills connecting them with the
31             sea, providing slow exchange with adjacent sea waters;
32
        August 1991
5  10-174     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10

11

12

13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
      • Lagoons are shallow, well-mixed, slowly flushed, and only slightly influenced by
        riverine inputs;

      • Embayments are deeper than lagoons, often stratified, only slightly influenced by
        freshwater inputs, and have good exchange with the ocean; and

      • River-Dominated Estuaries are a more diverse group of systems, all of which exhibit
        seasonally depressed salinities due to riverine inputs and variable degrees of
        stratification!               '

      The physical and chemical structure of estuaries will strongly shape the movement and

 transformation of nitrogen compounds»  Aston (1980) has provided a,list of features of

. estuaries which have a controlling influence on the geochemistry of contaminants and

 nutrients:                     ,     ,:     .    :      •-...•        ,;
 (a)   The tidal mixing of fresh and sea waters on a semi-diurnal or diurnal time scale, with
      corresponding changes in the volume of water in an estuary, produces temporal changes
      in the contributions of nutrients 'and dissolved gases from marine and fresh water
      sources.  For example, estuaries are generally enriched in nutrients relative to ocean
      waters due to the local influences of land drainage and often pollution.

 (b)   The circulation, and especially the stratification, of some estuaries can create vertical
      and horizontal variations of the concentrations of nutrients and dissolved gases within an
      estuary.

 (c)   Estuarine topography may give rise to particularly restricted circulations (e.g., in fjords,
      where the mixing of external sea water with the estuarine waters is greatly reduced) and
      the restricted mixing leads to unusual chemical environments,  for example
      oxygen-deficient waters.                             ,

 (d)   The circulation patterns in coastal waters and estuaries lead to the deposition of various  .
      types of sedimentary material. The deposition and resuspension of sediments may
      influence the budgets of dissolved constituents, including nutrients' and gases, in
      estuarine waters.

 (e)   Chemical reactions occurring during the mixing of river water with sea water may  lead
      to the removal or addition of the dissolved nutrients.  Also, the changes in temperature
      and salinity during estuarine mixing influence the  solubility of dissolved gases and  thus
      influence their removal or addition in an estuary.

 (f)   Biological production and metabolism have significant influences  on  the occurrence and
      distribution of nutrients and some gases (e.g., carbon dioxide and oxygen) in estuarine
      waters.   The biological communities in estuaries tend to be species-poor, because few
      species  are able to tolerate the extremes in environment to, which  they .are exposed.
      What species do thrive, however, are often productive.
        August 1991
                                          10-175     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  S
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
      In fact, estuaries may be extremely productive.  Fisheries yields in estuaries are higher
 per unit area than in lakes (Nixon, 1988).  This appears not to be related to primary
 production, but rather to the efficiency of utilization of the primary production.  The input of
 nutrients from outside the ecosystem may be a major determinant of overall fisheries
 production levels (Day et al., 1982).  The economic importance of estuaries may be simply
 indicated by McHugh's (1976) estimate that in 1970, 69% (by weight) of fish landings in the
 United States were estuary-dependent.
      Estuaries and coastal waters receive substantial amounts of weathered material (and
 anthropogenic inputs) from terrestrial ecosystems and from exchange with sea water.  As a
                                                         ' ;'.',••          . ^;
 result, they tend to be very well buffered; acidification is not a concern in any of these areas.
 The same load of weathered material and anthropogenic inputs that makes estuaries and
 coastal areas insensitive to acidification, however, makes them very prone to the effects of
 eutrophication.  Eutrophication of these areas has some very specific and damaging
 consequences) especially the creation of anoxic bottom waters, blooms of nuisance algae, and
 replacement of economically-important species by less-desirable ones (e.g., Mearns et al.,
 1982; Jaworski, 1981). Eutrophication, for example, has been suggested as the causal factor
                                                      i
 in the disappearance of the striped bass (Morone saxatilis) fishery in Chesapeake Bay (Price
 et al., 1985);  the increasing spatial extent of anoxic bottom waters during the summer season
 is the proposed mechanism (e.g., Officer et al.,  1984). Anoxia is also thought to have had
 disastrous effects on surf clams (Spisula solidissima) in the New York  Bight (Swanson and
 Parker, 1988) and the blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) habitat in Chesapeake Bay (Officer
 et al., 1984).  In 1971 blooms of the red tide dinoflagellate Ptychodiscus brevis in the Gulf of
 Mexico were responsible for the deaths of approximately 100 tons of fish daily; the high
 nutrient concentrations typical of eutrophic conditions have been linked to many blooms  of
 nuisance algae (Paerl, 1988).
     Establishing a link between nitrogen deposition and the eutrophication of estuaries and
 coastal waters depends on a determination (as it does in freshwater—see above) of two key
conditions. The first condition  is that the productivity of these systems is limited by nitrogen
availability.  The second condition is that nitrogen deposition be a major source of nitrogen to
the system.  In many cases,  the supply of nitrogen from deposition is minor when compared
to other anthropogenic sources,  such as pollution from either point or non-point sources.
       August 1991
                                        10-176      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1          Few topics in Aquatic biology have received as much attention in the past decade as the
 2     debate over whether estuarine and coastal ecosystems are limited by nitrogen, phosphorus, or
 3     some other factor (reviewed by Hecky and Kilham, 1988).  In a seminal paper published in
 4     1971, Ryther and Dunstan (1971) used evidence of ambient nutrient concentrations, and the
 5     results of bioassay experiments, to conclude that nitrogen limited the productivity of waters
 6     along the south shore of Long Island and in the New York Bight.  They noted that, during
 7     blooms of algae in these areas, inorganic nitrogen concentrations often decreased to levels
 8     below detection, while inorganic concentrations of phosphorus remained high.  From this
 9     evidence they deduced that phosphorus could not be a limiting factor, but that nitrogen could
10     be.  They conducted bioassay experiments, suspending in small bottles single-species cultures
11     of either Nannochloris atomus or Skelatonema costatum, the two algal species that were
12     dominant in the blooms in each location, in filtered sea water with additions of either
13     ammonium or phosphorus.  Ryther and Dunstan (1971) found that both species increased
14     dramatically in  ammonium-enriched bottles, but that phosphorus-enriched bottles were no
15     different than controls, and that this response was consistent at a large number of sites
16     throughout the  south shore of Long Island and in the New York Bight.  They concluded that
17     "nitrogen is the critical limiting factor to algal growth and eutrophication in coastal marine
18     waters" (Ryther and Dustan, 1971, p.  1008).
19           Since the  publication of this influential paper, many researchers have accepted the
20     notion that coastal waters and estuaries are limited primarily by nitrogen (e.g., Boynton
21     et al., 1982;  Nixon and Pilson, 1983), to the point where nitrogen-limitation in marine
22     waters, and phosphorus-limita.tion in freshwaters, has become near dogma (Hecky and
23     Kilham,  1988).  More recently, some  oceanographers have begun to question the ubiquity of
24     nitrogen-limitation in estuarine and coastal marine waters (e.g., Smith,  1984; Howarth,
25     1988), and it seems clear that evidence for nutrient limitation in these systems must be
26     analyzed on a case-by-case basis. Experiments to confirm widespread nitrogen limitation in
27     estuaries have not been conducted, and nitrogen limitation can not be assumed to be the rule
28     (Hecky and Kilham, 1988).
29           Estimations of nutrient limitation in estuaries and coastal marine ecosystems follow the
30     same three major lines of reasoning as arguments about freshwater nutrient limitation (see
31     Section 10.6.4.1):  (1) evidence from  ambient nutrient concentrations and the nutritional
        August 1991
10-177     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1      needs of algae; (2) evidence from bioassay experiments at various scales; and (3) evidence
                                            '   •    ,   ' '    p  •     •  f
 2      from nutrient dynamics and input/output studies (Hecky and Kilham, 1988; Howarth,  1988).
 3           As explained earlier, arguments based on ambient nutrient concentrations stem from the
 4      early work of Redfield (1934), who examined the concentrations of nutrients within the cells
 5      of nutrient-sufficient algae from marine systems worldwide, and found surprisingly consistent
 6      results for the ratio of carbon to nitrogen to phosphorus concentrations (106:16:1, using
 7      molar concentrations); deviations from these ratios are taken to be evidence that one nutrient
 8      or another is limiting to algal growth (e.g., molar N:P ratio values below 16:1  suggest
 9      nitrogen-limitation; values above 16:1 suggest phosphorus-limitation).  Various researchers
10      have extended interpretation of the Redfield ratio to include ambient nutrient concentrations in
11      water (Redfield's original work was with intracellular concentrations), and applied the
12      nutrient ratio criteria to waters  supplying estuaries and coastal systems to determine the likely
13      limiting conditions that these waters will produce (e.g., Ryther and Dunstan, 1971; Jaworski,
14      1981). The biotic response (i.e., biostimulation) is not measured using this approach, but is
15      instead inferred from geochemical principles; in this sense, the nutrient ratio approach
16      measures potential nutrient limitation rather than actual limitation. Boynton et al. (1982)
17      summarized nutrient ratio information for a number of estuarine systems; these results are
18      repeated in Table 10-27. At the time of maximum primary productivity, a majority of the
19      estuaries they surveyed (22 out of 27) had N:P ratios well below the Redfield ratio and may
20      have been  nitrogen-limited.
21           The data in Table 10-27, as well as from many  other studies, suggest that N:P ratios
22      vary widely within a single system from season to season. D'Elia et al. (1986), for example,
23      report ratios for the Patuxent River estuary that vary  from over 20:1 during the winter, to
24      less than 1:1 during the summer.  This variability suggests that estuarine algae may be
25      limited by different nutrients at different seasons.
26           The ambient nutrient ratio approach has been criticized widely because it ignores several
27      factors known to be important to algal growth.  The use of only inorganic nutrient species in
28      the ratios,  for example, has been criticized because many  algal species are known to utilize
29      organic forms, especially of phosphorus (Howarth, 1988); the nutrient ratios listed for
30      freshwaters systems (see freshwater eutrophication section, above) were based on
31      concentrations of total inorganic nitrogen and total phosphorus because these are thought to
       August 1991
10-178     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
TABLE 10-27. MOLAR RATIOS OF DISSOLVED INORGANIC NITROGEN (DIN)
    TO DISSOLVED INORGANIC PHOSPHORUS (DIP) IN A VARIETY OF
              ESTUARIES. FROM BOYNTON et al. (1982)
Estuary
Pamlico River, NC
Roskeeda Bay, Ireland
Narragansett Bay, RI
Bedford Basin, Nova Scotia
Beaufort Sound, NC
Chincoteague Bay, MD . • •
Western Wadden Sea, Netherlands
Eastern Wadden Sea, Netherlands
Peconic Bay, NY
Mid-Patuxent River, MD
S.E. Kaneohe Bay, HI
St. Margarets Bay, Nova Scotia
Central Kaneohe Bay, HI
Long Island Sound, NY
Lower San Francisco Bay, CA
Upper San Francisco Bay, CA
Barataria Bay, LA
Victoria Harbor, B.C.
Mid-Chesapeake Bay, MD
Duwamish River, WA
Upper Patuxent River, MD
Baltic Sea

Loch Etive, Scotland
Hudson River, NY
Vostock Bay, USSR
Apalachicola Bay, FL
High Venice Lagoon, Italy
DIN:DIP Ratio at
Time of Maximum
Productivity
0.2
' 0.3
0.5
0.8
1.0
. , . .1-2 - .
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.8
2^0
0.2
2.8
3.9
6.0
6.0
6.2
6.2
7.6
8.5
9.2
15
Redfield Ratio N:P = 16:1
18
20
20
20
48 • ' . .
Annual Range
in DIN:DIP Ratio
0-3
0-1
0.5-14
0.5-8
0.5-16
1-10
1.3-120
1.5-56
1-4
1.8-53
Not reported
1-7
Not reported
1-6
4.5-8.5
0.5-16
6-16
6-15
7-225
8-16
9-61
Not reported

12-125
16-30
5-22
5-22
48-190
August 1991
10-179    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     be better estimators of the nutrient species actually available to algae (Morris and Lewis,
  2     1988).  Algal growth may also be more dependent on the supply rates of nutrients than on
  3     their ambient concentrations (Goldman and Gilbert, 1982; Healey, 1973);  many species  of
  4     algae may therefore not be limited by nutrients whose ambient concentrations are so low as to
  5     be undetectable. Broecker and Peng (1982) have echoed the earlier conclusions of Redfield
  6     himself (1958) in pointing out that biologically-mediated nitrogen fixation, and loss rates of
  7     nitrogen from the surface waters of marine ecosystems, interact with terrestrial nutrient inputs
  8     and tend to push the N:P ratio in the particulate (i.e., living) fraction of water toward a
  9     "geochemicaUy balanced" ratio (i.e., the Redfield  ratio of 16:1).  Thus ratios within the
 10     biologically-active portion of the ecosystem (particularly the algae) may approach 16:1...
 11     despite much lower ratios in the abiotic portion of the ecosystem.  Taken as a whole, the
 12     evidence for nitrogen limitation from ambient nutrient concentrations in estuaries and coastal
 13     waters must be considered equivocal.
 14          A  second, and more direct, line of evidence for nutrient  limitation in estuaries and
 15     coastal waters comes from bioassay experiments.  These experiments have been conducted in
 16     both freshwater and marine systems at a number of scales from small single-species cultures
 17     (Level I experiments), to small enclosures of natural algal assemblages  (Level II), to
 18     intermediate-sized enclosures (mesocosms)  of natural assemblages Level III),, to whole-system
 19     (so far largely limited to whole lakes) treatments (Level IV; levels as defined by Hecky and
20     Kilham, 1988).  These experiments therefore progress along a gradient  of  "naturalness" from
21      studies substantially different from the real world (Level I), to those that simulate natural
22     conditions very closely (Levels III and IV). Interpretation of the results of these  experiments
23      therefore follows the same gradient, with more confidence being placed in the results of
24      studies at the upper (i.e., more natural) end of the gradient (Hecky and Kilham, 1988;
25      Howarth, 1988). The results of Level I experiments on single-species cultures of algae,  like
26      the original experiments of Ryther and Dunstan (1971),  are especially difficult to interpret
27      because  threshold N:P ratios for individual species are known to vary substantially. Suttle
28      and Harrison (1988) report limitation at ratios from 7:1  to 45:1 for single species.  At all
29      scales, the experimental procedure used for experimental nutrient additions is fairly similar,
30      with various nutrients being added either alone or in combination, and the  growth in treated
31      enclosures being compared to growth in control enclosures.
       August 1991
10-180
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1          Level I and Level II experiments have been conducted in a wide variety of estuaries and
 2     coastal waters (e.g., Thomas, 1970; Ryther and Dunstan, 1971; Vince and Valiela,  1973;
 3     Smayda, 1974; Goldman, 1976; Graneli, 1978) and often suggest nitrogen limitation.  Two
 4     studies have suggested seasonal changes from nitrogen limitation  to phosphorus limitation
 5     (D'Elia et al.,  1986; McComb et al., 1981); in both cases nitrogen deficient conditions were
 6     found during the peak of annual productivity in the summer.  The results of experiments at
 7     Levels I and II suggest that nitrogen limitation is at least a common, if not ubiquitous,
 8     phenomenon in coastal and estuarine waters.  This interpretation  has been challenged by
 9     Smith (1984) and Hecky and Kilham (1988) because the experiments were conducted at such
10     an unrealistic spatial scale.  In particular, Level I and II experiments measure only the
11     short-term response of algae present at the time the experiments are run; they do not allow
12     natural  mechanisms such as species replacement and nitrogen fixation to take place.
13          Only a few examples  of Level in bioassays exist for estuarine and coastal ecosystems.
14     The best known of these have been conducted at the Marine Ecosystem Research Laboratory
15     (MERL) at the University of Rhode Island. The MERL tanks are large (13 m3), relatively
16     deep (5 m) cylinders, with natural  sediments and filtered seawater inputs.  They are designed
17     to mimic the environment of the Narragansett Bay, including the mixing, flushing,
18     temperature, and light regimes (Nixon et al., 1984). In the original experiments conducted in
19     the MERL tanks, nutrients were added with ratios that matched those of sewage entering
20     Narragansett Bay,  but at concentrations that ranged from IX to 32X those in the bay itself;
21     the experiments were run for 28 mo.  Algal abundance, primarily diatoms, increased  with the
22     level of nutrient enrichment, but not on a 1:1  basis. Productivity increased only by a factor
23     of 3.5 in the 32X  treatment, suggesting that something other than nutrients was limiting for at
24     least a portion of the experiment (Oviatt et al., 1986). Oviatt et al. (1989) have suggested
25     that, in treatments with high levels of nutrient enrichment, grazing by zooplankton controlled
26     algal abundances to low levels, and that the upper limit to productivity was set by
27     self-shading in the algal community.  Further experiments conducted with varying nutrient
28     ratios suggested that diatoms in the low-nutrient (IX) treatments were limited by silica, and
29     not by  either nitrogen or phosphorus (Doering et al.,  1989).  Sewage inputs to many
30     estuaries, including  Narragansett Bay, are deficient in silica (Officer and Ryther,  1980), and
31      silica concentrations often fall to very low levels during winter diatom blooms  in this area
        August 1991
10-181     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  S
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 (Pratt, 1965).  Taken as a whole, the results of the MERL experiments suggest a complex
 picture for Narragansett Bay, where no nutrient is strongly limiting to algal biomass through
 much of the year, and where algal abundances during winter blooms are controlled ultimately
 by the concentrations of silica.
      In another Level HI bioassay experiment, D'Elia et al. (1986) simulated the
 environment of the Patuxent River estuary, a tributary to Chesapeake Bay, in 0.5 m3
 enclosures. Their results had a strong seasonal component. Supplements of nitrogen, either
 as NO3" or as NH4+, stimulated  growth during the low-flow, late-summer season. This
 corresponds to the time period when N:P ratios in the estuary are low (1:1 or lower).
 Phosphorus additions stimulated  growth during the late-winter, high-flow season, when N:P
 ratios typically exceed 20:1.  Peaks in algal abundance occurred in the summer, when anoxic
 conditions in bottom waters in Chesapeake Bay are common, and when algae appear to be
 nitrogen-deficient.
      Thus far only one Level IV  experiment has been conducted in estuarine waters, and
 only preliminary results are available.  Sewage treatments supplying nutrients to the
 Himmerfjard basin, a brackish fjord in the Stockholm archipelago on the eastern coast of
 Sweden, have been deliberately altered to produce varying  levels of phosphorus and nitrogen
 loads since 1983 (Graneli et al., 1990).  Between  1983 and 1985, phosphorus removal at the
 plant was deliberately reduced to produce a 10-fold increase in orthophosphate, and additional
 sewage inputs were routed into the basin to increase total nitrogen inputs by 30-40%.   At the
 same time as nutrient manipulations  were being carried out, measurements were made of
 nitrogen  cycling in the basin, and  algal bioassays were conducted to determine nutrient
 limitation.  Preliminary results suggest that nitrogen is limiting at low nutrient concentrations
 (i.e.,  typical of near-coastal regions  unaffected by anthropogenic inputs), and that limiting
 nutrients in areas affected by anthropogenic inputs are determined by the supply ratios of
 nitrogen and phosphorus (Graneli  et  al., 1990).  Because small changes in the supply of
 either phosphorus or nitrogen in the  Himmerfjard basin have caused changes in the identity of
 the limiting nutrient (i.e.,  increases in phosphorus quickly lead to nitrogen limitation, and
 vice versa), the authors suggest that management of both nitrogen and phosphorus is
necessary to reduce eutrophication in the basin.
       August 1991
                                        10-182     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1           The remaining line of evidence used to infer nutrient limitation in estuarine and coastal
 2      marine ecosystems comes from studies of nutrient dynamics, and especially of input/output
 3      budgets. In many ways, the results of these studies help to integrate the sometimes
 4      contradictory results gleaned from studies of nutrient ratios and bioassay experiments at
 5      different levels of complexity.  Smith (1984) summarized the studies conducted on four
 6      sub-tropical bays and concluded that phosphorus is more likely to be limiting in these systems
 7      than nitrogen, and that physical factors are often  more important than either nutrient.  Smith
 8      noted that in the systems that had high through-puts of water (i.e., "embayments" according
 9      to Boynton et al.'s [1982]  criteria, see earlier description), incoming ratios of nutrients were
10     matched very closely by the ratios in the outgoing water. This suggests that algal growth is
11      having little effect on nutrient levels, and that nutrients do not limit productivity. In systems
12     that flush more slowly (i.e., "lagoons" or "fjords" in Boynton et al.'s  [1982] classification),
13     any deficiencies in nitrogen in the incoming water can be made up by  nitrogen fixation on the
14     ocean bottom, and phosphorus is therefore more  likely to be limiting.
15           The question of why nitrogen deficiencies in marine systems are  hot simply made up by
16     nitrogen fixation, as  suggested by Smith (1984),  is central to the issue of whether estuaries
17     and coastal waters are primarily limited by nitrogen or not.  In lakes (see description in
18     freshwater eutrophication section), conditions of nitrogen deficiency often produce blooms of
19     planktonic blue-green algae, which fix atmospheric nitrogen and act to return the algal
20      community to a condition of nitrogen sufficiency (Schindler,  1977; Flett et al., 1980).  Only
21      when N:P ratios are extremely low, and blue-green algae are unable to fix enough nitrogen to
22      bring the ratio up to the Redfield proportions do lakes remain nitrogen limited (Howarth
23      et al.,  1988a).  Why then doesn't the same phenomenon' (nitrogen fixation by blue-greens)
24      occur in nitrogen deficient marine systems?  A major difference in the biogeochemistry of
 25      lakes and estuaries is that nitrogen fixation by free-living algae (phytoplankton) rarely occurs
 26      in estuaries, even when the N:P ratios of incoming water suggest severe nitrogen limitation.
 27      Howarth et al. (1988b), for example, surveyed  a large number of estuaries along the Atlantic
 28      coast of the United States, and found no instances in which nitrogen-fixing blue-green algae
 29     made up more than  1 % of the algal biomass.  A number of explanations for this lack of
 30     nitrogen fixation in estuaries have been proposed, including shorter water residence times
 31     (faster flushing rates) than lakes, greater turbulence than in lakes, and lower  concentrations of
         August 1991
10-183      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 micronutrients (especially iron and molybdenum) needed for the biochemically pathways in
 nitrogen fixation (Howarth, 1988; Howarth et al., 1988b). Of these, only the last argument
 really holds true in a comparison of lakes and estuaries.  Howarth and Cole (1985) and Cole
 et al.  (1986) have determined that the high concentrations of sulfate in marine systems
 interfere with the assimilation of molybdenum by marine algae, and propose that low rates of
 molybdenum availability are in turn limiting to rates of nitrogen fixation in many systems.
 Molybdenum limitation, however, has not been experimentally demonstrated in many marine
 environments.  In fact, many nutrient addition bioassays conducted in benthic environments
 have shown that the availability of organic matter and of oxygen-depleted microenvironments
 tightly control marine microbial nitrogen fixation potentials (Paerl et al., 1987;  Paerl and
 Prufert, 1987).  Because the enzymes needed for nitrogen fixation are readily inactivated by
 oxygen, rates of fixation may be limited by energy availability (i.e., the supply of carbon
 reductant) and ambient oxygenation.  By and large, nitrogen deficient marine waters are
 depleted in  readily oxidizable organic matter and are well oxygenated. When high rates of
 nitrogen fixation do occur in marine systems, they are usually associated with
 bottom-dwelling (benthic) algae (Howarth,  1988); these habitats are relatively enriched with
 organic matter and support localized oxygen-depleted microenvironments (Paerl et al., 1987).
 Iron is also  required for nitrogen fixation, and may limit rates of nitrogen fixation in some
 freshwater lakes (Wurtsbaugh and Home, 1983); concentrations of iron in seawater are often
 much lower than in freshwater, and while little direct evidence of limitation of nitrogen
 fixation by low iron concentrations exists, it is certainly a likely condition (Howarth et al.,
 1988b). It is difficult at this point in the debate  over marine nitrogen fixation to state
 anything definitively beyond the fact that nitrogen fixation is not common in marine waters
 (Carpenter and Capone, 1983; Howarth  et al., 1988a).  One possible conclusion from the
 debate among researchers in this field (e.g., Howarth et al., 1988b; Paerl et al., 1987) is that
 planktonic nitrogen fixers may be limited by micronutrient availability, while benthic nitrogen
 fixers are limited by availability of organic  carbon and high ambient oxygen levels, but both
 factors, as well as others, probably operate in both environments. Light, for example,
 appears to play a role in clear, tropical lagoons (Potts and Whitton, 1977; Wiebe et al.,
 1975), because benthic nitrogen-fixing algae in these environments require light for
photosynthesis.   The presence of benthic nitrogen fixation in Smith's (1984) sub-tropical
       August 1991
                                        10-184      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      lagoons may help explain the apparent contradiction between his predictions of phosphorus
 2      limitation, and experimental results suggesting nitrogen limitation, in slowly-flushed systems.
 3           Nixon and Pilson (1983) have summarized the results of numerous input/output studies
 4      in estuaries and coastal waters, and related the inputs of various nutrients to algal biomass.
 5      Their results for nitrogen are repeated in Figure 10-32, and are supported by a similar
 6      analysis conducted by Boynton et al. (1982) for algal productivity.  The relationship between
 7      nitrogen inputs and mean algal biomass in marine systems is certainly much weaker than the
 8      relationship between phosphorus and biomass in lakes (e.g., Schindler, 1978),  but is
 9      none-the-less suggestive of a general pattern of nitrogen-limitation in these systems
10     (Figure 10-32a).  Seasonal effects on nutrient ratios, grazing by zooplankton, and physical
11      factors such as light, circulation patterns and turbidity, all lend uncertainty to the relationship.
12     Perhaps the most important aspect of the relationship is the apparent strong dependence of
13     annual maximum chlorophyll concentrations (Figure 10-32b) on nitrogen inputs (r2  = 0.57,
14     p <0.0001).  Many of the most severe impacts of eutrophication are experienced during
15     summer algal blooms; these seem to be more strongly  dependent  on nitrogen than biomass in
16     other seasons (e.g., D'Elia et al., 1986).
 17           In summary,  there does seem to be confirmatory evidence of nitrogen limitation in
 18     many estuarine and coastal marine ecosystems. This conclusion is a general rule, rather than
 19     an absolute one, and other limiting factors certainly occur in some locations, and during some
20      seasons.  In general, ratios of nitrogen to phosphorus in inputs to estuaries and coastal waters
 21      are much lower than in lakes (Hecky and Kilham, 1988; Howarth,  1988), and this probably
 22      contributes strongly to the apparent difference between lakes and marine systems in their
 23      nutrient limitation.  These low ratios,  however, result largely from sewage inputs (Ryther and
 24      Dunstan, 1971; Jaworski, 1981; Howarth, 1988), and whether atmospheric deposition of
 25      nitrogen contributes to eutrophication in these systems will depend  strongly on the relative
 26     inputs of nitrogen  from these two sources.  As stated in the introduction to this section, any
 27    ' question of negative impacts on estuaries and coastal waters from nilrogen deposition depends
 28     both on a determination of nitrogen limitation, and on a determination that atmospheric
 29     deposition is a major  contributor of nitrogen to these ecosystems.
 30           Anthropogenic sources of nitrogen to estuaries and coastal waters include point sources
 31      (such as sewage plant outfalls), fertilizer and animal wastes in runoff, and atmospheric
         August 1991
10-185      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                  50-
              =   40-
              c.
o
x
o
C
              C
              £
              "E
                                   -H-H-
                      (o) Summer Means
                                                                 '6*
                  30
                  20
                  10-
                   10
                                   6«
                                                4*
                                    0.
                       3*
                                   100
                                    -*-H	
                                     100D
             0>
             x
             c
             o
                175-
                     (b) Annual Maxima
                15C
                125-1-
             §•  100-.
             S   75
                 50 J-
             o.
             £   25--
                                                                 Q •
                   10
                                         E*

                                    D*    I*
                                         12
                         15.

                         14*
                                   100             1000

                               Nitrogen Input (/u.oiol L~' yr~1)
Figure 10-32.  Concentrations of (a) mean algal chlorophyll, and (b) annual maximum
              chlorophyll, in the mid region of various estuaries (1-15) and in the
              MERL experimental ecosystems (A-G) as a function of the input of
              dissolved inorganic nitrogen. 1 - Providence River estuary, Rhode Island;
              2 - Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island; 3 - Long Island Sound; 4 - lower
              New York Bay; 5 - Delaware Bay; 6 - Patuxent River estuary, Maryland;
              7 - Potomac River estuary, Maryland; 8 - Chesapeake Bay; 9 Pamlico
              River estuary, North Carolina; 10 - Apalachicola Bay, Florida; 11 -
              Mobile Bay, Alabama; 12 - Barataria Bay, Louisiana; 13 - N. San
              Francisco Bay, California; 15 - Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii. Doted lines are
              from least squares regression, and are included to show strength of
              relationships; they do not imply causation. Note change in scale on
              vertical axis. Figure redrawn from Nixon and Pilson (1983).
August 1991
                        10-186     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      deposition (predominantly due to nitrogen oxides from combustion and ammonium from
 2      agricultural activity). Atmospheric deposition may be supplied directly to the surfaces of
 3      estuaries or coastal waters, or supplied indirectly to the watershed and subsequently
 4      transported to the coast by river flow.  As discussed earlier, nitrogen can be deposited in a
 5      variety of forms; two of the contentious issues in determining the impact of nitrogen oxides
 6      on estuarine ecosystems are estimating the total deposition, and the uncertainty in the relative
 7      proportion contributed by the different forms, especially between dry and wet deposition
 8      (e.g., Fisher etal., 1988a).
 9           Runoff inputs to estuaries may be the most variable of the nitrogen inputs.  They vary
10      with watershed area, precipitation rates, land use patterns (especially the use of fertilizer),
11      and rates of atmospheric deposition.  Spring runoff represents a  major input of nutrients to
12     estuarine and coastal systems.  Runoff inputs vary seasonally (e.g.,  JaworsM, 1981) and from
13     year to year (e.g., Boynton et al.,  1982; JaworsM, 1981).  Nitrate inputs to estuaries increase
14     markedly during flooding conditions (Biggs and Cronin,  1981),  and are at least partially
15     responsible for the finding that nitrogen is less likely to be limiting  in the winter and spring
16     than in the summer (above).
 17           Point sources of nutrients  may be particularly important near urbanized areas.  Sewage
 18     inputs contribute more than half of the inorganic nitrogen content to a number of major
 19     estuaries in the United States:  Long Island Sound (67%), New  York Bay (82%), Raritan Bay
20     (86%), San Francisco.Bay (73%), and Delaware Bay (50%) (Nixon and Pilson,  1983).
 21           Natural and anthropogenic sources of nitrogen to coastal waters may result in the same
 22      form of nitrogen (e.g., NO3") being transported by  the same route  (e.g., river input).  Their
 23   •   effects will therefore be indistinguishable, and it becomes impossible to assign
 24      "responsibility" for a problem to  a particular source. This has obvious consequences for
 25      policy decisions, since, for example, there are many possible regulatory actions which could
 26      all result in the reduction of nitrate input to a particular estuary. It may be more cost
 27      effective, for example, to increase the efficiency of nitrogen removal in sewage treatment,
 28      than to reduce NOX emissions, even if NO3" inputs from atmospheric deposition are
 29     increasing.
 30           The first published attempt  to determine the relative importances of nitrogen from
 31     deposition, and nitrogen from runoff, was that of Correll and Ford (1982) for the Rhode
         August 1991
10-187     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 River estuary, a tributary to the Chesapeake Bay.  Correll and Ford assumed in their analysis
 that all atmospheric nitrogen deposited on the watershed was retained, and that the only
 atmospheric inputs of nitrogen to the estuary were those that fell directly on the water
 surface.  This estimate should therefore be considered a lower limit to the importance of
 atmospheric deposition, since some terrestrial watersheds do show retention capacities lower
 than  100%  (see discussion of nitrogen saturation, above).  Correll and Ford (1982) conclude
 that,  on an  annual basis, atmospheric and watershed sources of nitrogen to the Rhode River
 are approximately equal.  During the summer and fall, a period when the Chesapeake Bay
 undergoes substantial anoxia, precipitation inputs of nitrogen may slightly exceed those from
 watershed runoff.  It is important to note that the watershed of the Rhode River estuary is
 small relative to the estuary itself (the watershed is less than six times the size of the estuary).
 These results should be extrapolated with caution to situations where watershed sizes may be
 orders of magnitude larger than those of the waters that drain them.  The entire Chesapeake
 Bay,  for example, is approximately one-fifteenth the size of its watershed, and the relative
 importance  of nitrogen falling directly on the water surface would therefore be smaller
 relative to terrestrial inputs.
      Paerl (1985) has determined that NO3" enriched rain, falling on  the waters of Bogue
 Sound (an embayment), the Continental Slope, and the Gulf Stream (all off the east coast of
 North Carolina), increased algal biomass as much as four-fold, and that rain falling directly
 on the ocean surface accounted for as much as 10-20% of the volume of water supplied to
 these near-coastal areas.  More recent work (Paerl et al., 1990) indicates that rainfall
 additions as low as 0.5% by volume stimulated algal primary production and biomass in these
 nitrogen-limited waters. Paerl (1985) and Paerl et al.  (1990) did not estimate the proportion
 of the total nitrogen inputs to these areas that entered as precipitation, but they do suggest
 that algal blooms initiated by direct inputs of nitrogen from large rain storms could be
 sustained by NO3" enriched runoff from nearby land masses. Terrestrial inputs  of nitrogen
 (from runoff) usually lag rainfall by 4-5 days in this region.  These studies appear to be
unique in showing a direct link between nitrogen deposition and algal  productivity, but do not
provide enough information to estimate the overall importance of deposition to the
maintenance of high algal biomass in these waters.
       August 1991
                                        10-188      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      10.6.4.3  Evidence for Nitrogen Deposition Effects in Estuarine Systems—Case Studies
 2           Complete nitrogen budgets, as well as information on nutrient limitation and seasonal
 3      nutrient dynamics, have been compiled for two large estuaries, the Baltic Sea and the
 4      Chesapeake Bay, and for the Mediterranean Sea.  In the case of the Mediterranean, Loye-
 5      Pilot et al. (1990) suggest that 50% of the nitrogen load originates as deposition falling
 6      directly on the water surface.  In the case of the Baltic and Chesapeake, deposition of
 7      atmospheric nitrogen has been suggested as a major contributor to the eutrophication of the
 8      estuaries (see below).  Data for  other coastal and estuarine systems are less complete, but
 9      similarities between these two systems and other estuarine systems suggest that their results
10     may be more widely applicable.  The discussion in this document is limited to these two
11      "case studies," with some speculation about how other estuaries may be related.
12                                                                     ...
13     The Baltic Sea
14          The Baltic Sea is perhaps the best-documented available case study of the effects of
15     nitrogen additions in causing estuarine eutrophication.  Like many other coastal waters, the
16     Baltic Sea has  experienced a rapidly increasing anthropogenic nutrient load; it has been
17     estimated that the supply of nitrogen has increased by a factor of 4,  and phosphorus by a
18     factor of 8, since the beginning of the century (Larsson et al., 1985).  The first observable
19     changes attributable to  eutrophication of the Baltic were declines  in the concentration of
20     dissolved oxygen in the 1960s (Rosenberg et al., 1990).  Decreased dissolved oxygen
21     concentrations result when decomposition in deeper waters is enhanced by the increased
22     supply of sedimenting algal cells from the surface water layers to the sediments.  In the case
23     of the Baltic, the spring algal blooms that now result from nutrient enrichment consist of
24     large, rapidly sedimenting algal cells, which supply large amounts of organic matter to the
25      sediments for decomposition (Enoksson et al., 1990).  Since the  1960s, researchers in the
26      Baltic have documented increases in algal productivity, increased incidence of nuisance algal
27      blooms, and periodic failures and unpredictability in fish and Norway Lobster catches
28      (Fleischer and Stibe, 1989; Rosenberg etal., 1990).
29           It has now been shown by a number of methods that algal productivity in nearly all
 30      areas of the Baltic Sea is limited by nitrogen.  Nitrogen to phosphorus ratios range from
 31      6:1 to 60:1  (Rosenberg et al., 1990), but the higher values are only found in the remote, and
        August 1991
10-189      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
27
28
29
30
31
 relatively unimpacted, area of the Bothnian Bay (between Sweden1 and Finland).  Productivity
 in the spring (the season of highest algal biomass) is fueled by nutrients supplied from deeper
 waters during spring overturn (Graneli et al., 1990); deep waters are low in nitrogen and
 high in phosphorus, resulting in N:P ratios near 5 (Rosenberg et al., 1990), suggesting
 potential nitrogen limitation when deep waters are mixed with surface waters.  Low nitrogen
 to phosphorus ratios in deep water result from denitrification in the deep sediments (Shaffer
 and Ronner, 1984). Primary productivity measurements in the Kattegat (the portion of the
 Baltic between Denmark and  Sweden) correlate closely with uptake of NO3", but not of PO43"
 (Rydberg et al.,  1990).  Level n and IE nutrient enrichment experiments conducted in near-
 shore areas of the Baltic, as well as in the Kattegat, indicate nitrogen limitation at most
 seasons of the year (Graneli et al.,  1990).  Growth stimulation of algae has also been
 produced by addition of rain water to experimental enclosures, in amounts as small as 10% of
 the total volume (Graneli et al., 1990); rain water in the Baltic is enriched in nitrogen, but
 phosphorus-poor. In portions of the Baltic where freshwater inputs keep the salinity low,
 blooms of the nitrogen fixing blue green alga Aphanizomenon flos-aquae are common
 (Graneli et al., 1990); blue green algal blooms are common features of nitrogen-limited
 freshwater lakes  (see Section  10.6.4.1), but are usually absent from marine waters.
      Nitrogen budget estimates indicate that the Baltic Sea as a whole receives 7.3 X
 1010 eq • yr'1 of nitrogen, of which 2.8 X 1010 eq • yr'1 (37%) comes directly from
 atmospheric deposition (Rosenberg  et al., 1990).  Fleischer and Stibe (1989) report that the
 nitrogen flux from agricultural watersheds feeding the Baltic have been decreasing since
 ca. 1980, but that the nitrogen contribution from forested watersheds is increasing; they cite
 both increases in nitrogen deposition,  and the spread of modern forestry practices, as causes
 for the increase.  It should be noted, however,  that the Baltic also experiences a substantial
phosphorus load from agricultural and urban lands,  and that phosphorus inputs may help to
 maintain nitrogen-limited conditions (Graneli et al., 1990).  If the Baltic had received
consistent nitrogen additions (e.g., from the atmosphere or from agricultural runoff)  in the
absence of phosphorus additions, it  might well have evolved into a phosphorus-limited system
some time ago.
     The physical structure of the Baltic Sea, with a shallow sill limiting exchange of water
with the North Sea (see the definition of a fjord, above) contributes to the eutrophication of
        August 1991
                                         10-190     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
11     the basin, by trapping nutrients in the basin once they reach the1 deeper waters.  Because the
 2     larger algal cells that result from nutrient enrichment in the basin provide more nutrients to
 3     the deep water through sedimentation, and because only shallow  Waters have the ability to
 4     exchange with the North Sea, it is estimated that less than 10% of nutrients added to the
 5     Baltic are exported over the sill to the North Sea (Wulff et al., 1990). Throughout much of
 6     the year (i.e., especially during the dry months) productivity in the Baltic is maintained by
 7     nutrients recycled within the water column (Enbksson et al., 1990).  The trapping of nutrients
 8     within' the basin,  and recycling of nutrients from deeper waters by circulation patterns,
 9   '-  suggest :that eutrophication of the Baltic is a self-accelerating process (Enoksson et al., 1990),
10     with a long time  lag between reductions of inputs and improvements in water quality.
n      •      -.- --  . :.    .    -     .•-•-...-:• '    --  .•'-,..•-•.•, '.  -•
12     The Chesapeake Bay
13           The most complete attempts to estimate the relative importance of atmospheric
14     deposition to  the overall nitrogen budget of an estuary or coastal ecosystem in the United
15     States were completed for the Chesapeake Bay by the mvironmental Defense Fund (EDF;
16     Fisher et al.,  1988a), and by Versar, Inc. (Tyler,-1988) in 1988. Neither of these reports has
17     been published in a peer-reviewed arena, but the issue of atmospheric contributions to the
18     eutrophication of the Chesapeake has been widely discussed (and criticized) particularly after
19      the publication of the EDF report, and bears close examination for these reasons.
20           Both reports conclude that atmospheric deposition makes a substantial contribution
21      (25-40% of total inputs) to the nitrogen budget of the Chesapeake Bay.  In both cases,
22      nitrogen budgets for the Bay were constructed via a number of steps, each of which involved
23      simplifying assumptions which bear further examination.  Both reports calculate inputs from
24      atmospheric deposition to the Bay itself (Step #1), -atmospheric deposition to the watershed
25      (#2), fertilizer application in the watershed (#3), generation of animal wastes in the watershed
26      (#4), inputs from urban land use (#5),  and point source inputs (#6).  Once the total inputs to
27      the watershed and Bay were estimated, both reports calculated the proportion of the inputs
28      that were retained by the watershed (Step #7), and the proportion that were retained within
 29      the rivers and tributaries feeding the Bay (#8).
 30          The two reports had different goals, which make their results difficult to compare. The
 31      EDF report (Fisher et al.,  1988a) estimated the proportions of both NO3~ and NH4+
         August 1991
10-191      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     deposition to the total nitrogen budget of the Chesapeake (including all forms of nitrogen, and
 2     both baseflow and storm flows).  The Versar report (Tyler, 1988), on the other hand,
 3     estimated only contributions of NO3", because NH4+ does not result from the burning of
 4     fossil fuels, and excluded baseflow contributions.  In addition, the Versar report used a range
 5     of values both for the watershed contributions made by each nitrogen source (deposition,
 6     fertilizers, etc.)  and for the fraction of the inputs retained by the watershed (transfer
 7     coefficients).  This results in a wide range of budget values for each of the sources, and for
 8     the relative importance of NO3", deposition to the budget, which complicates any comparison
 9     of the results of the two studies.  None-the-less, the two reports used similar methods in
10     developing their budgets, and a combined discussion of the uncertainties involved in each of
11     the steps listed above is warranted.
12          The results for the two budgets are presented in Table 10-28.  Since the publication of
13     these budgets, additional information on such issues as dry deposition,  and retention of
14     nitrogen by forested watersheds, has become available. This new information has been
15     compiled to produce a third "refined" budget, which is also presented in Table 10-28. The
16     assumptions that were used to construct the refined budget are outlined in each of the
17     discussions of individual budgeting steps below.                                  .
18          The major uncertainty involved in calculating direct inputs to the Chesapeake from
19     atmospheric deposition (Step #1, above) is estimation of the contribution of dry deposition
20     (see also Section 10.2).  Both reports use actual deposition monitoring data (i.e.,  from
21     NADP/NTN) to estimate the nitrogen load from wet deposition, and then assume that the rate
22     of dry deposition of nitrogen in, the watershed is equal to the rate of wet deposition.  As
23     discussed earlier (see section on nitrogen inputs), the measurement of dry deposition  is a
24     much vexed issue, and most researchers make educated guesses of rates of dry deposition by
25     assuming that they are some fraction of wet deposition rates. The assumption that dry
26     deposition is equal to wet deposition is probably reasonable for areas directly adjacent to
27     emissions sources (Summers et al.,  1986),but the ratio of dry deposition to the sum of wet
28     and dry deposition may fall as low as 0.2 in locations remote from sources.  For  example,
29     Barrie and Sirois (1986) estimated that dry deposition contributed 21 to 30% of total NO3"
        August 1991
10-192     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
    TABLE 10-28.  THREE NITROGEN BUDGETS FOR THE CHESAPEAKE BAY
Source of Nitrogen.
    EDF Budget    Versar Budget
   (eq X 109 • yr-1) (eq X  109 • yf})
        Refined Budget
        (eq  X 109 • yr-1)
Direct Deposition
  N03-                                               0.6
  NH4+                                              0.3
  N Load to Bay (from direct deposition)13               0.9
Forests                       ...
  NO3' Deposition                                    6.4
  NH4+Deposition                                   3.5     80%
  Watershed Retention  .                              0.6     50%
  In-stream Retention                                 1-0
  Atmospheric NO3' Load to Bay (from forests)
  N Load to Bay (from forests)13
Pasture Land
  NO3'Deposition                         ,           .1.7
  NH4+ Deposition                                   0.9
  , Animal Wastes                •                     13.9
  Watershed Retention                                0.5
  In-stream Retention                                 1.1
  Atmospheric NO3" Load to Bay (from pastures)
  N Load to Bay (from pastures)6
Cropland               ,                                          ,
  NO3" Deposition                                    1-8     }7Q%
  NH4+Deposition                                 .1.0..
  Fertilizers                                         11-3
  Watershed Retention                                0.6
  In-stream Retention      .                           4.2
  Atmospheric NO3" Load to Bay (from cropland)
  N Load to Bay (from cropland)13.         •               '
Residential/Urban
                     0.5
                      _a
                     0.5

                     6.0
                      _a
                    0.15
                    0.15
95%
50%
0.4
0.2
0.6

4.6
2.5
0.5
0.7
                    .1.2          ,  . 0.9
             95%°    -a    94-99%  ' 0.5
             50%c   8.4    50%     13.9
                  0.01-0.04          0.09
                ,   0.05-0.3   •        0.6
                     2.0              1.5
                      -*•    76-99%    0.8
                   5.9-19.3  50%     11.3
                   0.010.2   •        0.05
                   0.04r2.6         .   0.4
84.6%
 35%
                  95 %d
                  35%
                  95%
                  35%
NO3' Deposition
NH4+ Deposition
Watershed Retention
In-stream Retention „ . •
Atmospheric NO3" Load to Bay (from urban areas)
N Load to Bay (from urban areas)13
Point Sources
NO3- LOAD TO BAY (FROM DEPOSITION)
TOTAL NITROGEN LOAD TO BAYb,
% of N from NO3" deposition
0.3
, 0.2
0.2
0.3


2.4
2.50
9.95
25%
0.5
35% -* .62-96%
0% 0.01-0.1 20%
, ; 0.01-0.1 ,


1.4-2,3
0.67-1.06
2.16-5.90
18-31%e
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.2


2.4
1.09
4.87
22.5%

50%
35%







,aThe Versar Budget (Tyler,  1988) does not calculate loads of NH4+.                           .
bFor the EDF Budget (Fisher et al., 1988a) and refined budget total nitrogen load to the Bay includes both NO3"
 and NH4+. The Versar Budget (Tyler, 1988) includes only NO3'.                     .
•Watershed and In-stream retention values for pastureland in the EDF Budget apply only to animal wastes.  For
 atmospheric deposition, the cropland retention value (70%) was used.
d95% retention was used for animal wastes; 85% retention was used for deposition (see text).
The range of contributions  of NO3" deposition to the total budget were calculated by comparing maximum to
 maximum estimates, and minimum to minimum estimates.  These combinations are more likely to occur during
 extreme (e.g., very wet or  very dry) years.
 August 1991
10-193      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 deposition in eastern Canada.  Baker (1991) concludes that dry deposition of NO3" is ca. 40%
 of wet, while dry deposition of NH4+ is approximately 34% of wet (resulting in ratios of dry
 to wet plus dry deposition of 0.29 and 0.25, respectively), for areas remote from emissions.
 Li the most complete analysis of dry and wet deposition of NO3" to date, Sisterson et al. (in
 press) report ratios of dry to wet plus dry deposition of 0.35 for two locations inside or near
 the borders of the Chesapeake Bay watershed (State College, Pennsylvania, and West Point,
 New York). Based on the results of these studies,  it seems that the assumption made in the
 two Chesapeake Bay nitrogen budgets (i.e., that dry deposition is equal to, wet) probably
 overestimates the importance of dry deposition. The 0.35 ratio is used in constructing the
 refined budget in Table 10-28.
      The two reports (Fisher et al., 1988a; Tyler,  1988) also present different values for the
 direct contribution of wet deposition to the Bay, because they use different methods to
 estimate the spatial pattern of deposition in the Bay and its watershed.  The EDF report uses
 wet deposition values from the nearest NADP collector; the Versar report extrapolates
 deposition values from isopleth maps of NO3" deposition. In addition,  the Versar report
 includes  direct atmospheric inputs to,the tributaries of the Bay, as well  as to the Bay itself
 (Table 10-28).  Aside from .problems with estimating dry deposition, it seems likely, that the
 approach used in the Versar  report for estimating deposition is more precise than that used in
 the EDF report.  The Versar values for wet deposition were therefore used in the,refined
 budget, after adjusting them  to reflect a 35% contribution from dry deposition.  Ammonium
 deposition was calculated for the refined budget by applying the ratio of NH4+ to NO3"
 deposition reported in the EDF report to the estimated NO3" deposition values from the
 Versar report (i.e.,  these values assume that the spatial,pattern in NH4+ deposition is the
 same as the spatial pattern for NO3" deposition).
     The uncertainties involved in estimating nitrogen deposition to the Chesapeake Bay
watershed (Step #2) are similar to those for estimating direct deposition.  It seems likely that,
by assuming dry deposition is equal to wet, both reports overestimate the dryfall contribution
to deposition.  Differences between the estimates of wet deposition presented in the two
reports result from the same  methodological differences used in estimating direct inputs (i.e.,
use of the nearest NADP collector, vs. extrapolated values from isopleth maps), and slight  ,
differences in the estimates of the coverage of each land use type. The Versar method
       August 1991
                                        10-194     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     produces slightly lower estimates of atmospheric nitrogen inputs to the basin (Table 10-28)
 2     and, as in the case with estimates of direct deposition to the Bay, the Versar method probably
 3     produces better estimates of basin-wide deposition loads than the EDF approach.  The refined
 4     budget uses the Versar values for wet NO3" deposition (adjusted to reflect a 0.35 ratio for dry
 5     deposition, as above), and estimates of NH4+ deposition based on the Versar spatial
 6     deposition pattern, and the EDF estimate of NH4+deposition, as above.
 7          The EDF report (Fisher et'al., 1988a) uses county agricultural reports and U.S. Census
 8     Bureau data to calculate the application rates of fertilizers to the counties (and portions
 9     thereof) in the Chesapeake Bay watershed (Step #3, above):  The Versar report (Tyler, 1988)
10     calculates the total fertilizer load (from NO3") to the watershed by applying a correction
11     factor to the level of fertilizer application recommended by the U.S. Department of
12     Agriculture; the correction factor was based on local officials' best guesses of actual fertilizer
13     application rates (e.g., 30 to 60%  of the recommended rates).  Because it deals only with
14     NO3" loading, the Versar approach also necessitates making an assumption about the
15     proportion of nitrogen fertilizers that are applied as NO3", as opposed to NH4+ or urea; the
16     report assumes that 60% of the nitrogen added is in the form  of NO3", but presents no data to
17 '    support this assumption.  Because it is more direct in nature, the EDF approach to estimating
18     fertilizer inputs seems to be more  defensible than the Versar approach, and the EDF estimate
19     is therefore used in the refined budget.  The EDF estimate of 11.3 X 109 eq •  yr'1 is near
20     the bottom range of fertilizer loads estimated by the Versar report (Table 10-28).
21          The EDF (Fisher et al., 1988a)  and Versar (Tyler,  1988) reports use the same estimate
22     (from the EDF report) for the contribution by animal wastes (Step #4, above) to the nitrogen
23     budget.  The EDF report used county agricultural statistics to calculate the total number of
24     farm animals of different types in the Chesapeake Bay  watershed. These population numbers
25     were then multiplied by published estimates of the amount of nitrogenous wastes excreted by
26     each type of animal annually, to produce an estimate' of 13.9  x 109 eq • yr"1.  As in the
27     estimates of fertilizer NO3" inputs, the Versar report assumed that 60% of animal nitrogenous
28     wastes were in the form of NO3"; this estimate seem especially  difficult  to justify when it is
29     used both for animal wastes and for fertilizers, as there is no reason to expect both nitrogen
30      sources to have the same composition.  The EDF estimate of 13.9  X 109 eq • yr"1  is used for
31      the refined budget.
        August 1991
10-195     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
      In both reports, atmospheric deposition is considered to be the only source of nitrogen
 to urban areas (Step #5, above).  As pointed out in the Versar report (Tyler, 1988), this is
 likely to be an underestimate because it ignores fertilizer applications to lawns and gardens.
 Because fertilizers applications are seasonal, and the area of urban land in the basin is small
 (about 3% of the total), this underestimate is considered  unimportant.  As mentioned earlier,
 the EDF (Fisher et al., 1988a) and Versar reports use slightly different methods to calculate
 wet deposition. The primary difference between the two estimates of nitrogen loading to
 urban areas (Table 10-28), however, is in their estimate of the proportion of the basin in
 residential and urban land use (5 x  105 ha in the EDF report vs. 8 x  105 ha in the Versar
 report).  In neither case does the nitrogen contribution from urban lands (<2% of the total
 loading to the watershed) play a significant role in the budgets.  The Versar estimate of
 deposition to urban areas is used in the refined budget, with the same adjustments applied  as
 for the deposition to the watershed/and directly to the Bay (above).
      Both reports used the same EPA estimates of point  source inputs to the Chesapeake Bay
 watershed  (Step #6, above); the lower value presented in the Versar report (Tyler,  1988) is
 the estimated proportion of point source inputs that are in the form of NO3", again assuming
 that NO3" is 60% of total inorganic nitrogen.  The upper limit to the range of point source
 inputs presented by the Versar report is a more recent (1988) estimate from the Chesapeake
 Bay Program.  There seems to be little reason not to use the original EDF value (Fisher
 et al., 1988a)  of 2.35 X 109 eq • yr'1 (Table 10-28),  and this value is used in the refined
 budget.
      Perhaps the greatest source of uncertainty in both nitrogen budgets is created when the
 proportions of nitrogen inputs that are retained within the watershed are estimated (Step #7,
 above).  Both  reports use a variety of methods to calculate separate transfer coefficients for
 each land use type,  and in some cases,  for  different sources of nitrogen within a single land
 use type. In particular, the Versar report (Tyler, 1988) compares calculated loads (as
 described in the preceding paragraphs) to calculated runoff from each land use type (from
Smullen  et al., 1982) and estimates a range of transfer coefficients from these calculated
values. Because the error inherent in the calculated values is amplified when they are
compared,  this method seems especially problematic.  Often the calculated transfer
coefficients differ greatly from coefficients  measured for single basins within the Chesapeake
        August 1991
                                         10-196     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     Bay watershed.  The transfer coefficients for each land use type are discussed in detail below.
 2     It should be emphasized that all of the nitrogen budgets discussed below deal only with
 3     inorganic forms of nitrogen (i.e., NO3" and NH4+).  Outputs of organic nitrogen from
 4     watershed can be substantial (e.g., Correll and Ford, 1982), and organic forms can result
 5     from atmospheric deposition sources when watershed processes route nitrogen through the
 6     biotic portion of the ecosystem. Given this possible source of error, the nitrogen retention
 7     values presented below should probably be considered maximum estimates.
 8           Estimating watershed retention of nitrogen in forested watersheds is difficult, primarily
 9     because so few  data are available, and the applicability of single watershed values to wide
10     areas of the Chesapeake Bay watershed is untested.  The Versar (Tyler, 1988) report
11     compares calculated deposition loads (Table 10-28) to estimates of runoff from forests (from
12     Smullen et al.,  1982) to yield a transfer coefficient of 4.8%.  As discussed above, this
13     estimate must be considered very uncertain, because of the combined errors introduced by
14     comparing two calculated values.  The EDF report (Fisher et  al., 1988a) found literature
15     values that ranged from 50% (in the Mid-Appalachians) to 97% (in the Coastal Plain), and
16     used 80% as a "reasonable mid-range estimate."  Given the range of possible retention
17     values, it seems unlikely that any single number would be a reasonable estimate for the entire
18     Chesapeake Bay watershed.  Some additional nitrogen retention values are given in
19     Table 10-29, based on published nitrogen budgets for watersheds in or near the Chesapeake
20     Bay basin.  These are arranged  according to physiographic regions, in order to illustrate the
21     spatial variability in watershed nitrogen retention. Of the values in Table 10-29, only those
22     of Kaufmann et al. (1991) are applicable to broad spatial areas, because they are based on a
23     probability  sampling of streams in each region.  These values assume that NO3"
24     concentrations at spring baseflow are representative of annual mean concentrations (Kaufmann
25     et al., 1988; Messer et al.,  1988).  If the retention coefficients for each physiographic region
26     are weighted by the proportion of the Chesapeake Bay watershed in each physiographic
27     region (from Smullen et al., 1982), an area-weighted retention coefficient of 84.6% results;
28     this figure was used for the refined budget (Table 10-28).  The 84.6% figure agrees
29     remarkably well with the data presented in Figure 10-16b (Driscoll et al., 1989a), which
30      suggest an interpolated coefficient of 84.7% at the levels of deposition calculated for the
        August 1991
10-197
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
           TABLE 10-29.  WATERSHED RETENTION OF NITROGEN IN WATERSHEDS
          IN OR NEAR THE CHESAPEAKE BAY BASIN, FROM PUBLISHED REPORTS.
          ALL NITROGEN LOADS HAVE BEEN RE-ESTIMATED BASED ON MEASURED
            WET DEPOSITION, AND A 35% CONTRIBUTION TO TOTAL DEPOSITION
                                    FROM DRY DEPOSITION
Physiographic Region
Poconos/Catskills"
Biscuit Brook, NY
Northern Appalachiansb
Southwestern Pennsylvania
Southwestern Pennsylvania1"
Fernow, WV
Eastern Tennessee
Valley and Ridgeb
Catoctin Mountains, MD
Shenandoah National Park, VA
Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plainb
Chesapeake Bay, MD
Piedmont*
Northern Georgia
Southern Blue Ridgeb
eq X
N Load'
-
878
-
1,192
-
1,506
707
-
593
557
-
1,000
-
486
'
106 • yr'1
NO3" Export
-
214
-
264
-
607
36
-
250
3
-
10
. -
11
-
% Retention
88.3%
75.7%
72.7%
78.0%
94.5%
59.5%
94.6%
78.5%
57.5%
99.5%
90.9%.
99.0%
90.2%
97.7%
88.3%
Source
Kaufmann et al. (1991)
Stoddard and Murdoch (1991)
Kaufmann et al. (1991)
Barker and Witt (1990)
Sharpe et al. (1984)
Helvey and Kunkle (1986)
Kelly (1988)
Kaufmann et al. (1991)
Katz et al. (1985)
Shaffer and Galloway (1982)
Kaufmann et al. (1991)
Weller et al. (1986)
Kaufmann et al. (1991)
Buell and Peters (1988)
Kaufmann et al. (1991)
       •Nitrogen loads are calculated from published wet deposition estimates, extrapolated to total deposition
        according to a 0.35 dry:wet plus dry ratio (see text)
       ^Retention estimates are calculated by comparing mean concentrations of precipitation to mean concentrations i
        stream water.  Estimates from Kaufmann et al. (1991) are from the National Stream Survey (Kaufmann
        et al., 1988) and are for the population of streams within each physiographic province.
                                                                                in
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
Chesapeake Bay watershed (636 eq • ha"1 total deposition, or 413 eq • ha"1 of wet
deposition).
     Nitrogen retention by pasturelands is generally thought to be very high.  Both the EDF
(Fisher et al., 1988a) and Versar (Tyler, 1988) reports estimate retention coefficients in the
94-99% range. As with forest nitrogen retention, the EDF estimate is based on published
values from watershed studies, while the Versar estimate is based on comparisons of
calculated loads and calculated runoff.  The EDF estimate (95%) is based primarily on a
study by Kuenzler and Craig (1986; as reported in Fisher et al., 1988a) on pastureland in the
Chowan River watershed. Similar results (94.4% retention) have been reported for
unfertilized pasture lands in Ohio by Owens et al. (1989),  where NO3" losses  were lower
       August 1991
                                      10-198     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1  ,    from pastureland than from nearby undisturbed forests (86% retention).  Nitrogen retention
 2      coefficients reported here were recalculated to include dry deposition (at 35% of total
 3      deposition), as was the case for forest nitrogen budgets reported above.  The EDF report
 4      applies the 95% retention rate only to animal wastes,  and uses a 70%  retention coefficient for
 5      atmospheric deposition.  Because they are primarily in the form of particulate organic matter,
 6      it seems reasonable to assume that animal wastes will be more strongly retained than
 7      deposition.  The refined budget therefore applies the 95 % retention figure for animal wastes,
 8      and an 85% retention coefficient (as for forests, above) for nitrogen from deposition
 9      (Table 10-28).
10           The ability of croplands to retain nitrogen is generally high, because most of the
11      nitrogen applied to crops as fertilizer is removed as biomass during harvest (Lowrance et al.,
12      1985; Groffman et al.,  1986).  Both the  EDF (Fisher et al., 1988a) and Versar (Tyler, 1988)
13      budgets compare estimates of fertilizer and deposition loads to estimates of runoff from
14      croplands to calculate nitrogen  transfer coefficients.  Use of loads estimates from a number of
15      sources creates a range of retention coefficients from 70% (Fisher et al.,  1988a) to 99%
16      (Tyler, 1988).  Published values from studies of cropland watersheds are all toward the
17      higher end of this range.  Peterjohn and  Correll (1984) measured a retention coefficient of
18      '93.2% for a fertilized corn field in Maryland.  Groffman et al. (1986) report 100%  retention
19      of fertilizer nitrogen in a sorghum field in the Georgia piedmont; lower retention coefficients
20      (76.1 %) were measured  during the winter, but the planting of crimson clover (a nitrogen-
21      fixing legume) as a winter cover crop complicates the interpretation of these figures.
22      Lowrance et al. (1985) report nitrogen budgets for four cropland watersheds with a variety of
23      crops  in the Georgia Coastal Plain, with  retention coefficients ranging from 97.8 to  100%.
24      Nitrogen retention coefficients reported here were recalculated to include dry deposition (at
25      35% of total deposition), as was the case for forest and pastureland nitrogen budgets reported
26      above. A retention coefficient of 95 %, as used for the refined budget (Table 10-28) is near
27      the middle of the range of published values.  Fertilizer inputs are generally in the same
28      inorganic forms as atmospheric deposition, and there seems no  reason to apply different
29      retention values to fertilizer and deposition sources of nitrogen.
30           Published reports of nitrogen retention in urban lands are apparently unavailable.  The
31      EDF report (Fisher et al.,  1988a) simply chose a retention coefficient midway between their
        August 1991
10-199
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      cropland value (70%) and complete runoff from impervious surfaces (100%).  The Versar
 2      report (Tyler, 1988) calculates transfer coefficients from estimated loads (from deposition)
 3      and estimated runoff, and gives a range of 62% to 96% (Table 10-28).  There is little
 4      justification for choosing any particular value.  The 50% value used for the refined budget
 5      (Table 10-28) is chosen only to provide a "ball-park" value; slightly higher or lower values,
 6      when applied to the relatively small atmospheric loads falling on urban areas, will not
 7      substantially change the conclusions presented here.
 8          The final assumption that affects the nitrogen budgets concerns the proportion of
 9      watershed runoff that is lost during transport through rivers to the Bay (step #8, above).
10      Denitrification in slow moving lotic waters can  significantly reduce the load of nitrogen
11      delivered to estuarine waters (see Section 10.6.2.4).  In the absence of any measured loss
12      rates, both the EDF (Fisher et al., 1988a) and Versar (Tyler, 1988) reports adopt the 50%
13      loss value suggested by the Chesapeake Bay Program (Smullen et al., 1982).  More recently,
14      denitrification values have been published for two rivers, the Potomac, which  supplies water
15      directly to the Chesapeake Bay, and the Delaware, which is adjacent to the Chesapeake Bay
16      watershed (summarized in Seitzinger,  1988a).  Seitzinger (1987) estimated that 35% of the
17      dissolved inorganic nitrogen (NO3~ + NH4+) load to the Potomac River was lost through
18      denitrification. Seitzinger (1988b) measured denitrification rates at six locations in the tidal
19      portion of the Delaware River, and estimated that 20% of the dissolved inorganic nitrogen
20      load was lost through denitrification.  Both of these studies were conducted in the relatively
21      flat, slow-moving and tidal portions of rivers, where  denitrification rates are likely to be
22      maximal, due to the existence of anoxic sediments. Data from smaller streams suggest that
23      lower rates of nitrogen retention (10-15%) are more likely to occur in headwater streams
24      (Triska et al., 1990; Duff and Triska, 1990).  In light of these lower measured rates of
25      nitrogen loss, the 50% figure used in the EDF and Versar budgets seems insupportable for
26      riverine losses; loss rates as high as 50% have been measured only  in estuarine waters (e.g.,
27      Narragansett Bay, Seitzinger et al., 1984; Baltic Sea, Larsson et al., 1985).  The refined
28      budget uses a figure of 35%, reflecting the only known value for a river feeding the
29      Chesapeake itself (Seitzinger, 1987), and may still overestimate in-stream retention in small
30      streams.
       August 1991
10-200
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1           When the three budgets are compared, they suggest a wide range in estimated
  2      contributions from individual sources of nitrogen (e.g., estimates of cropland inputs vary
  3      from 0.04 X 109 eq • yr"1 for the "best case" Versar budget, to 4.2  X 109 eq • yr"1 for the
  4      EDF budget), but a surprisingly consistent percentage contribution from atmospheric NO3"
  5      deposition (18 - 31%) to the total budget (Table 10-28).  All three budgets suggest that a
  6      large amount of nitrogen enters the Bay from deposition; the 1.1 x 109 eq • yr"1  estimate
  7      from the refined budget corresponds to a nitrogen load of 19 tons per day entering the
  8      Chesapeake Bay from deposition directly to the Bay and the watershed.  The caveat presented
 •9      earlier concerning organic forms of nitrogen should probably be repeated here; the estimates
 10      of atmospheric NO3" contributions to the Bay ignore all but the inorganic nitrogen fractions.
 11      Organic nitrogen can be a substantial contributor to the nitrogen in runoff,  and could
' 12      potentially have a large atmospheric deposition component.  Many of-the estimates that went
 13      into these budgets are relatively certain.  For example, we have good data  on wet deposition,
 14      and can extrapolate to total  deposition with reasonable certainty  given recent estimates of dry
 15      deposition within the watershed (e.g., Sisterson et al., in press).  The biggest uncertainty in
 16      estimating atmospheric NO3" loading to the Bay comes results from the figure for retention of
 17      nitrogen by forested watersheds. This influence results from the fact that most of the
 18      watershed (ca. 80%) is forested; small changes in the retention coefficients can have a large
 19      effect on the estimated load to the Bay from these watersheds.  The retention coefficient
 20     calculated for the refined budget (84.6%) is our current best estimate, based on regional
 21      estimates of retention within each of the physiographic regions in the Chesapeake Bay basin,
 22     however it still contains considerable uncertainty.  The retention coefficients listed in
 23     Table  10-29 suggest that retention can vary from less than 60% to more than 99% in
 24     individual watersheds.  Many more values from individual watersheds are needed before we
 25     can be certain how representative the values for each physiographic region are.
 26          Taken as a whole, the budgets suggest that deposition is approximately equal in •
 27     importance to point source  supplies of nitrogen, and is possibly more important than
 28     agricultural sources of nitrogen (Table 10-28).  The fact that three different approaches (i.e.,
 29     the three budgets in Table 10-28) yield similar results lends weight to the suggestion that
 30     atmospheric nitrogen contributes substantially to the eutrophication of the Chesapeake Bay.
 31     These results are surprising, given the emphasis usually placed on reducing point source
         August 1991
10-201
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     inputs to the Bay in order to improve water quality (e.g., Chinchilli, 1989; Caton,  1989).
  2     Based on the results of nutrient limitation work discussed earlier, it seems  clear that the
  3     control of nitrogen inputs is important to the control of eutrophication in the Chesapeake Bay.
  4     The results of the budget exercises discussed here suggest that any  program for nitrogen
  5     control should include the control of nitrogen deposition, as well as point and non-point
  6     sources.
  7          Finally, atmospheric NO3" inputs to the Chesapeake should be put into the context of
  8     seasonal nitrogen limitation of algal productivity in the Bay.  As was discussed earlier, the
  9     Bay may undergo seasonal shifts hi nutrient limitation, from phosphorus limitation in late
 10     winter and early spring, to nitrogen limitation during summer and fall (e.g., D'Elia et al.,
 11     1982; D'Elia et al., 1986). If atmospheric NO3" is to have a significant effect on algal
 12     biomass, it would need to be present during the late summer,  low flow, high biomass period.
 13     However,  much of the NO3" load occurs during the spring, when river flows and NO3"
 14     leakage from watersheds are high (e.g., Lowrance and Leonard,  1988). In the case of the
 15     Baltic Sea, discussed earlier, nutrients were largely trapped within the estuary by
 16     sedimentation processes, and minimal water exchange with the North Sea.  Does the
 17     Chesapeake Bay act in a similar manner to trap nutrients, providing a mechanism for
 18     springtime loads of NO3" to influence summertime productivity?  Unfortunately, few
 19     measurements of the nutrient retention capacities of the Chesapeake are available, but some
20     estimates have been made.  Smullen et al. (1982) estimated, based on some measurements of
21      current and nutrient concentrations at the mouth of the Bay, and a simple box model, that
22     virtually all of the nitrogen entering the Bay was retained.  Nixon (1987) and Nixon et al.
23      (1986) question this conclusion,  and point out the such high nutrient retention rates  should
24      result in very high nutrient concentrations in the sediments,  which have not been found.
25      Based on estimates of sediment nutrient concentrations, Nixon et al. (1986) calculate that only
26      ca. 5% of nitrogen entering the Bay is retained.  The argument of Nixon et al. (1986),
27      however,  seems to ignore the potential effect of denitrification in maintaining low sediment
28      nitrogen concentrations, despite high rates of retention by the  Bay.  Fisher et al. (1988b)  use
29      longitudinal profiles of nutrient concentrations through the Bay to estimate that 33 to 71% of
30      nitrogen entering the bay is retained.  These lower  estimates of nitrogen retention suggest that
31      nitrogen entering the Bay during spring runoff does have the potential to affect productivity
       August 1991
10-202     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     in the Bay during the critical summer months.  They also suggest, however, that the
 2     Chesapeake could return to background nitrogen concentrations within several flushing times
 3     of the Bay, or within several years (Fisher et al., 1988b), if nutrient control strategies were
 4     put in place.
 5          It is impossible to determine at this point whether the Chesapeake Bay example is an
 6     unusual one in terms of the relative importance of atmospheric nitrogen inputs.  Jaworski
 7     (1981) gives crude nitrogen budgets for four estuaries and embayments in the United States;
 8     his results suggest that the Chesapeake Bay receives an unusually large proportion of nitrogen
 9     (68%) from land runoff (which includes agricultural and deposition  sources).  Jaworski's
10     (1981) budgets indicate that wastewater discharges are more important in the Hudson  River
11     (New York) and San Joaquin River (California) estuaries (63% and  47% of inputs,
12     respectively, but these estimates do not include deposition), while the Potomac River estuary
13     has equal inputs from wastewater and land runoff.  Of Jaworski's four systems, the
14     Chesapeake Bay is the least influenced by point source pollution, but it also receives larger
15     inputs  from point sources than many estuaries in the United States (e.g., the Apalachicola
16     Bay, Nixon and Pilson, 1983).  If  one views all estuarine and coastal waters as lying  along a
17     gradient from high- to low-influence by point source pollution, then the relative importance
18     of deposition to the nitrogen budget will change as one moves along the gradient.  The
19     general applicability of the nitrogen budget results from the Chesapeake Bay will depend on
20     where the Bay falls along this gradient.
21
22     10.6.5  Direct Toxicity Due to Nitrogen Deposition
23          In addition to the effects of acidification and eutrophication, nitrogen deposition could
24     potentially contribute to directly toxic effects in surface waters. Toxic effects on freshwater
25     biota result from un-ionized ammonia (NH3) that occurs in equilibrium with ionized
26     ammonium (NH4+) and OH".   High NH3  concentrations are associated with lesions in gill
27     tissue, reduced growth rates of trout fry, reduced fecundity (number of eggs), increased egg
28     mortality, and increased susceptibility of fish to other diseases as well as a variety of
29     pathological effects in  invertebrates and aquatic plants (reviewed in  U.S. Environmental
30     Protection Agency, 1985).  Most analytical methods for ammonium actually measure the sum
31     of ammonia (NH3) and ammonium (NH4+), which is commonly referred to as NH4+; for
        August 1991
10-203
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  S
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 clarity, the sum of ammonium and ammonia will be referred to here as total ammonia
 CT-NH3). No single toxic concentration for T-NH3 can be established, because the relative
 contribution of NH3 to T-NH3, and the toxicity of NH3, vary with the pH and temperature
 (Emerson et aL, 1975), and the ionic strength (Messer et al., 1984) of the water.  The
 proportion of NH3 increases at higher temperatures and increasing pH. Because of the
 variability in NH3 toxicity, hew criteria have recently been developed which calculate the ..
 toxicity as a function of pH, temperature and ionic strength (U.S. Environmental Protection
 Agency, 1985).  The new regulations require the calculation of a "final chronic value" (FCV)
 and "final acute value" (FAV); 4-day average concentrations of NH3 cannot exceed the FCV
 more often on average than once every three years, nor can 1-h average concentrations
 exceed one-half of the FAV more  often on average than once every three years.
     Critical concentrations of NH3 that cause the  various effects are wide ranging and are
 related to site specific temperature and pH values.  For example, 48-h LC50 values (the
 concentration at which 50% of the test organisms die within 48 h)  for Daphnia magna, a
 common invertebrate found in lake zooplankton, range from 38 to 350 jumol • L"1 T-NH3
 over a temperature range  from 19.6 °C  to 25 °C and pH range of 7.4 to 8.6 (U.S.
 Environmental Protection Agency, 1985).  However,  results of toxicity tests on stream insects
 showed that 96-h LC50 values ranged from 128 to 421 /zmol • L"1 T-NH3 at relatively
 constant chemical conditions.  The 96-h LC50 values  for rainbow trout range from 11.4 to
 78.5 #mol • L"1 T-NH3.  Fingerlings  tend to be less sensitive than older life stages and lower
 oxygen concentrations increased sensitivity to NH3. Variation in temperature, pH,
 acclimation time, and  CO2 concentrations also appeared to explain some variation in
 responses.  Effler et al. (1990) calculate FCV and FAV values for Onondaga Lake, an urban
 lake in Syracuse, New York, that is heavily polluted with municipal sewage. For both
 salmonid and non-salmonid fishes, the FCV values varied (with time of year) from  1.4 to
2.9 /Jmol • L"1. One-half FAV values for non-salmonids varied from 3.6 to 28.6 /Jmol • L"1
 (acute  toxicity information for salmonids is not given).  At typical pH (pH = 8) and
temperature (temperature  = 20 °C) values for Onondaga Lake, the minimum FCV value of
 1.4 jamol • L"1 corresponds to a T-NH3 concentration of 36 /zmol • L"1; this concentration is
always exceeded in the lake (Effler et al., 1990).
       August 1991
                                       10-204
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1          Onondaga Lake is unusual in being very productive, and so tends to be warmer and
 2     have a higher pH than many lakes.  At lower pH values (pH =  7) and lower temperatures
 3     (15 °C) the percentage of T-NH3 that is free NH3 drops dramatically (Emerson et al., 1975),
 4     so that the FCV values reported for Onondaga Lake would not be exceeded until a T-NH3
 5     concentration of 785 #mol • L"1 was reached.  Currently no areas of North America are
 6    ~ known to experience rates of NH4+ deposition that are sufficient to produce such high
 7     concentrations in surface waters.  Given current maximal concentrations of NH4+ in
 8     deposition (40 /zmol L"1, Stensland et al.,  1986) and reasonable  maximum rates of  dry
 9     deposition and evapotranspiration (dry equal to 100% of wet deposition, and
10     evapotranspiration equal to 50% of deposition), maximum NH4+ concentrations in surface
11     waters will be less than 160 /rniol • L"1.  If all nitrogen in deposition (NO3~ + NH4+) were
12     ammonified, maximum potential NH4+ concentrations attributable to deposition would be
13     approximately 280 #mol • L"1, and unlikely to be toxic except in unusual circumstances.
14     Since NH4+ is rapidly oxidized to NO3" in watershed soils, and under well oxygenated
15     conditions in lakes and streams, the likelihood of reaching toxic concentrations are extremely
16     limited.  Toxic levels would be more likely in systems that have oxygen deficits, high organic
17     matter loading (which would increase oxygen demand and contribute ammonium through
18     mineralization processes), and direct inputs of ammonia (i.e., near feed lot operations).  In
19     such cases it would probably be more effective to remove the local causes of oxygen
20     depletion, and organic matter loading, than to reduce atmospheric inputs of nitrogen.  It
21     appears from the information above that the potential for directly toxic effects attributable to
22     nitrogen deposition in the United States is very limited.
23                            .
24
25     10.7  DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY
26     10.7.1  Introduction
27           Since the mid-1980s the view has emerged that the atmospheric deposition of inorganic
28     nitrogen has impacted aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. In many areas of the United States
29     it is known that the atmospheric input of nitrogen compounds has been significant  (U.S.
30     Environmental Protection Agency, 1982, Section 10.7.2), however, the impacts have
31     generally been unknown or considered benign. Although, the evidence linking nitrogen
        August 1991
10-205
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     deposition with ecological impacts has been tenuous, there has been a growing concern
  2     (Skeffington and Wilson, 1988).  This concern has been magnified because (1) the
  3     atmospheric concentrations of nitrogen compounds have increased in North America and most
  4     European countries and (2) ecosystems formerly limited by nitrogen have become nitrogen
  5     saturated via atmospheric deposition.  These concerns have led to the efforts to develop
  6     "critical loads" of nitrogen for various ecosystems.  A "critical load" is defined as,
  7     "a quantitative estimate of an exposure to one or more pollutants below which significant
  8     harmful effects on specified sensitive elements of the environment do not occur according to
  9     present knowledge"  (Nilsson and Grennfelt, 1988).
 10          Human welfare is dependent on ecological systems and processes.  Natural ecosystems
 11     are traditionally spoken of in terms of their structure and functions.  Ecosystem structure
 12     includes the species  (richness and abundance), their mass and arrangement in an ecosystem.
 13     This is an ecosystem's standing stock—nature's free "goods" (Westman,  1977).  Society reaps
 14     two kinds of benefits from the structural aspects of an ecosystem: (1) products with market
 15     value such as fish, minerals,  forest and pharmaceutical products, and genetic resources of
 16     valuable species (e.g., plants for crops, timber, and animals for domestication) and (2) the
 17     use and appreciation of ecosystems for recreation, aesthetic, enjoyment and study (Westman,
 18     1977).                                 «
 19          Ecosystems have both structure and function.  The most visible levels of organization
20     are:  (1) the individual and its environment; (2) the population and its environment; and
21      (3) the biological communty and its environment, the ecosystem (Billings,  1978).
22     Ecosystems function as energy and nutrient transfer systems.  Vegetation through the process
23      of photosynthesis accumulates, uses, and stores carbon compounds (energy), to maintain their
24     physiological processes amd to build plant structure.  Carbohydrates and other compounds
25      accumluated and stored by plants are the basic source of food (energy and nutrients) for the
26     majority of animals and microorganisms.  Energy moves unidirectionally and ultimately
27      dissipates into the environment.  Nutrients are .recycled into the system.  Because the various
28      ecosystem components are chemically interrelated,  stresses placed on individual components,
29      such  as those caused by nitrogen deposition and loading, can produce perturbations that are
30      not readily reversed and will  significantly alter the ecosystem.
31
       August 1991
10-206     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      10.7.2 The Nitrogen Cycle
 2           Nitrogen, one of the main constituents of the protein molecules essential to all life, is
 3    ,  recycled within ecosystems.  Most organisms cannot use the molecular nitrogen found in the
 4      earth's atmosphere. It must transformed by terrestrial and aquatic microorganisms into a
 5      form other organisms can use.  The. transformations of nitrogen as it moves through the
 6      ecosystem is referred to as the ."nitrogen cycle."  Mature natural-ecosystems are essentially
 7      self-sufficient and independent of external additions.  Modern technology by either adding
 8      nitrogen or removing nitrogen from ecosystems may be upsetting the relationships that exist
 9      among the various components and thus changing its  structure and functioning.
10
11      10.7.3  Nitrogen Deposition
12          The removal (dry deposition) of reactive nitrogen gases from the atmosphere occurs
13     along several pathways leading, to foliage, bark, or soil with pathways to foliage being
14     predominant during the growing season.  The prevalence of any particular type of deposition
15     is a function of (1) the physicochemical properties  of nitrogen compounds, (2) their ambient
16     concentration, and (3) the presence of suitable receptor sites in the landscape (e.g., leaves
 17     with open stomata). Average canopy-level measurements (Table 10-30) exhibit the following
 18     pattern or tendency towards dry deposition HNO3  > NH3  = NO2 > NO.  Although the
 19     leaf-level data for crops is incomplete (NO and HNO3  data are not available), the leaf
 20      conductance (Kx)  data for trees shows a similar pattern. These patterns are consistent with
 21      observations of Bennett and Hill  (1973), and can be  partially explained by gas solubility
 22      characteristics (Taylor et al.,  1988).  Particle deposition data averaged across species and
 23      experimental techniques shows approximately three times greater nitrate aerosol deposition
 24      (7.8 mm s'1) than for ammonium (2 mm s'1).  However, the high average depositon velocity
 25      (Vd) for NO3' is probably excessively high due to the  unavoidable inclusion of nitrate from
 26     HNO3 in measurements of nitrate deposition.
 27          With the possible exception, of nitric acid vapor,  deposition characteristics of reactive
 28     nitrogen compounds are highly variable and dramatically influenced by environmental
 29     conditions that effect .stomatal conductance.  The tight relationship between stomatal
 30     conductance and the deposition of NO and NO2 implies that gaseous deposition of reactive
 31     nitrogen oxides is greatly reduced in the dark when stomata close (Hanson et al., 1989; Saxe,
         August 1991
10-207     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
             TABLE 10-30. MEAN DEPOSITION CHARACTERISTICS OF REACTIVE
                    NITROGEN GASES AT THE LEAF OR CANOPY SCALE OF
                           RESOLUTION FOR CROP OR TREE SPECIES
Compound
Summary for Crop Species
NO
N02
HN03
NH3
Summary for Tree Species
NO
NQ2
HNO3
NH3
Leaf Level Measures
Kj (mm s'1)3

• NDb ,
1.2
ND
.4.5

<0.3 '
1.1
2.1- •
1.8
Canopy Level Measures
Vd (mm s"1)a

1.3 ;
7.7
19.8
6.6

ND
24
41
22
       'Means are the average for all species studied.  However, measurements on dormant plant materials, foliage
        with low stomatal conductance, and data recorded in the dark were excluded.  The values listed as K, and Vd
        for particles represent the leaf wash and throughfall measurement techniques, respectively.
       bND; No data for crop plants were available.
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
1986; Hutchinson et al.,  1972). Deposition of gaseous N forms is usually proportional to
ambient concentrations, but "compensation concentrations" at which no uptake occurs (i.e.,
<0.003-0.005 ppmv) have been reported for NO2 and NH3.  Data for NO, NO2, and HNO3
(Grennfelt et al., 1983; Johansson, 1987; Marshall and Cadle 1989; Skarby et al., 1981),
from the vegetation dormant period, show a reduced potential for deposition. Conversely,
participate nitrate and ammonium deposition do not appear to be affected by the season of the
year (Gravenhorst et al.,  1983; Lovett and Lindberg 1984).
     The preceding information on gases and particles indicates that methods for measuring
gas or particulate deposition may produce dramatically different, results. Leaf-level measures
of deposition (Kj) for NO, NO2, and HNO3 were 4 to 10 times lower than estimates obtained
       August 1991
                                      10-208     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      using micrometeorological canopy-level measurements (Vd). This discrepancy can largely be
 2      explained once canopy area instead of ground area is factored into the canopy based
 3      measurements.                       ..•'.••
 4           The canopy-level deposition velocity measurement (Vd) has been criticized because it
 5      attempts to pool environmental, physiological, and morphological characteristics into a single
 6      descriptive measurement (i.e.,  it attempts to dp too much; Taylor et al., 1988).  The result of
 7      this over simplification is that Vd for even a  single trace gas varies substantially in  space and
 8      time. However, average KL and Vd values for NH3 on crop species were comparable,
 9      perhaps because crop canopies are more uniform and closer to the ground.  Particle
10     deposition is governed by a different set of principles (see section 10.2.3) and the same
11      relationships between leaf and  canopy level measurements may not be applicable.
12           Daytime rates of nitrogen oxide or ammonia deposition can also be approximated from
13     ambient concentrations of the gases (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1982; Hicks
14     et al., 1985), and deposition constants such as those presented in Table 10-30.  Hanson et al.
15     (1989) used such information with conservative estimates of concentration to approximate
16     total N deposition from nitrogen dioxide to various forest stands. They predicted NO2-N
17     inputs between 0.04 and  1.9 kg N ha"1 yr"1 for natural forests and inputs up to 12  kg N ha"1
18     yr"1 for forests in urban environments.   For  a forested watershed, Grennfelt and Hultberg
19     (1986)  calculated the annual deposition of NO2 plus HNO3 to be in the range from 3.6 to
20     5.1  kg  N ha"1 yr"1. Hill (1971) estimated the removal of NO2 from the atmosphere in
21     Southern California to be approximately 109 kg N ha"1 yr"1.
22           Preliminary particle deposition measurements and calculated dry deposition estimates of
23     reactive nitrogen gases, indicate significant nitrogen inputs to terrestrial systems. Barrie and
24     Sirois (1986) estimated that dry deposition contributed 21 to 30% of total NO3" deposition in
25     eastern Canada. Lovett and Lindberg (1986) concluded that dry deposition of nitrate is the
26     largest form of inorganic nitrogen deposited to oak-hickory forests in eastern Tennessee.
27     Annual estimates of NH3 deposition have been reported (Cowling and Lockyer 1981; Sinclair
28      and van Houtte, 1982), but numerous reports of NH3 evolution from foliage under conditions
29      of high soil N  confound simple estimates of annual NH3-N deposition.  Lovett (1991)
30      summarized research data for a number of forested sites in North America and Norway  and
        August 1991
10-209  '   DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     ' concluded that dry deposition of nitrogen typically occurs at annual rates approximately equal
  2      to nitrogen deposited in precipitation.
  3           Because gaseous deposition is difficult to measure accurately or continuously at the
  4      landscape level of resolution, estimates of dry nitrogen deposition must rely on models.
  5      Rigorous models of pollutant deposition have been developed  (Hicks et al.,  1985; Baldocchi,
  6      1988; Baldocchi et al., 1987), and will be needed in the future for accurate determination of
  7      reactive nitrogen gas and particle deposition to forest stands and ecosystems. Although
  8      progress has been made in understanding the modeling process that control the dry deposition
  9      of nitrogen containing compounds, additional research will be required to minimize errors in
10      predictions of total dry nitrogen deposition to specific regions and under a range of
11      environmental conditions.
12           Increased efforts have been made to establish both wet and dry deposition rates of
13      nitrogen to various types of ecosystems.  These current deposition data are important as they
14      provide a basis to evaluate potential effects against "suggested critical levels". Although  the
15      concept of critical nitrogen loading has not yet been widely adopted in North America  (based
16      on amount of published data), a comparison of total nitrogen deposition data for North
17      America and proposed critical loads provide a reasonable comparison of the status of
18      terrestrial systems with respect to changes expected from elevated levels of nitrogen
19      deposition.  Table 10-31 summarizes wet deposition data for nitrate and ammonium in  the
20      United States.  Since the data are for wet deposited forms of nitrogen, they represent an
21      underestimate of the total nitrogen deposition to the ecoystems.  Table 10-32 summarizes
22      information regarding the total (wet and dry) deposition of nitrogen to a variety of
23      ecosystems/forest types or regional areas in North America and Europe.
24
25      10.7.4 Effect of Deposited Nitrogen on Forest Vegetation and Soils
26           The effects of N deposition upon biological systems must be viewed from the
27      perspective of the amount of N in the system, the biological demand for N, and the amount
28      of deposition.  If N is deposited on an N-deficient ecosystem, a growth increase will likely
29      occur.  If N is deposited on an ecosystem with adequate supplies of N, nitrate leaching will
30      eventually occur.  Nitrate leaching is usually deemed undesireable in that it can contaminate
31      groundwater and lead to soil acidification.
        August 1991
10-210
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 TABLE 10-31.  MEAN ANNUAL WET NITRATE AND AMMONIUM DEPOSITION
   TO VARIOUS STATES LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES.
        THE STATES ARE PRESENTED IN ORDER OF THE GREATEST
                         ANNUAL N DEPOSITION
Location
Pennsylvania
New York
Ohio
Georgia
Tennessee
Illinois
N. Carolina
Arkansas
Virginia
Florida
Oklahoma
Colorado
Alabama
New Mexico
S. Dakota
Texas
California
Washington
Wyoming
Arizona
Utah
Idaho
Oregon
Montana
Arizona
Hawaii
No. of Sites
3
5
2
1
1
4
4
1
1
2
3
4
1
4
1
3
.5
3
3
1
1
1 '
4
4
1
1
Forms
Nitrate
10.9
9.7
7.6
.6.9
6.9
6.2
6.2
5.0
5.3
4.9
4.1
4.3
3.7
3.6
2.7
3.1
2.9
2.7
2.5
2.6
2.5 '
2.3
2.1
1.9
1.0
0.08
of N Deposition
Ammonium
1.3
'"' 1.4 " '
'1.7
1.1
0.8
1.3
1.1
1.3
0.5
0.6
1.3
0.6
0.6
0.5
1.3
0.6
0.6
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
,0.4
0.2
0.01
(Kg ha'1 yr'1)
Totala
12.2
11.1
9.3
8.0
7.7
7.5
7.3
6.3
5.8
5.5
5.4
4.9
4.3
4.1
4.0
3.7
3.5
3.0
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.3
1.2
0.1
Total deposition data is for wet deposited forms only and as such represents an underestimate of the total
 nitrogen loading received by these geographic areas.
August 1991
10-211     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 TABLE 10-32.  MEASUREMENTS OF VARIOUS FORMS OF ANNUAL NITROGEN
     DEPOSITION TO NORTH AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN ECOSYSTEMS.
   MEASUREMENTS OF TOTAL DEPOSITION DATA THAT DO NOT INCLUDE
   BOTH A WET AND DRY ESTIMATE PROBABLY UNDERESTIMATE TOTAL
       NITROGEN DEPOSITION AND ARE ENCLOSED IN PARENTHESES
 Site
 Location/Vegetation
  Forms of N Deposition (Kg ha"1 yr"1)
    Wet  .  . .           Dry
Cloud   Rain
Particles  Gases
Total
United States
CA, Chaparral
CA, Sierra Nevada
GA, Loblolly pine
NC, Hardwoods
NC, White pine
NY, Red spruce
TN, Oak forest #2
WA, Douglas fir
U.S. Regions
Adirondacks
Canada
Alberta (southern)
British Columbia
Ontario
Ontario (southern)
Fed. Rep. Germany
Spruce (SE slope)
Netherlands
Oak-birch
Douglas fir
Douglas fir
Norway
Spruce

8.2
—
3.7
4.8
3.7
7.3 6.1
6.0
1

6.3

7.3
5.5 '
3.7
2.3

16.5

_.
._
19.3

10.3

-
__
1.0 4.2
0.5
0.9 2.7
0.2 2.3
1.2
—

4.7

12.2C
—
-
1.4

__

_.
—
95.7°

0.7 0.2

23b
•(2)
9
5.3
7
16
7
(1)
'
11

19.5
(5)
(4)
3.7

16.5

24-56b
17-64b
115

11.2
'—Symbolizes data not available or in the case of cloud deposition not present.
'Total nitrogen deposition was based on bulk deposition and througbfall measurements and does include
 components of wet and dry deposition.
Includes deposition from gaseous forms.
August 1991
 10-212    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1           This analysis focuses upon forest ecosystems, because they are sensitive to both the
 2      positive and negative effects of N deposition.  Agricultural lands are excluded from this
 3      discussion because crops are routinely fertilized with amounts of N (100-300 kg/ha) that far
 4      exceed pollutant inputs even in the most heavily polluted areas.  Pollutant N inputs to
 5      grasslands and arid soils can be expected to produce increased growth in some instances,
 6   .   despite water limitations (e.g., Fisher et al., 1988).  However, these systems are obviously
 7      not subject to the soil acidification and groundwater NO3" pollution problems that might
 8      occur in more humid areas. Excess N deposited on these ecosystems leaves via either
 9      denitrification or NH4+  volatilization (see review by Woodmansee,  1978).
10          The biological competition for atmospherically-deposited N among heterotrophs
11      (decomposing microorganisms), plants, and nitrifying bacteria combined with the chemical
12     reactions between NH4+ and  humus in the soil determine the degree to which vegetation
13     growth increase will occur and the degree to which incoming N is retained  within the
14     ecosystem.  Until recently, nitrifying bacteria were thought to be poor competitors for N,
15     with heterotrophs the most effective competitors and plants intermediate. Recent studies of
16      soil N dynamics using 15N (Davidson et al., 1990) and a through analyses of forest N
 17     budgets suggest that these assumptions and perhaps our conceptual model of soil N Cycling
 18      need modification.  Specifically, nitrification may be proceeding at a significant level without
 19      the appearance of NO3~ in soils or soil solution if NO3" is rapidly taken up by heterotrophs.
20      It is also clear that trees can be very effective competitors for atmospherically-deposited N in
21      N-deficient ecosystems.  Finally, the role of chemical reactions between NH4+ and humus
 22      need to be investigated; such reactions have been shown to be very important in fertilization
 23      studies, and they may also play a major role in unfertilized ecosystems.  If this is the case,
 24      the fundamental assumption that N retention is controlled  primarily by biological processes
 25      may be erroneous.
 26          Nitrification and NO3" leaching become significant only after heterotroph and plant
 27     demand for N are substantially satisfied, a condition that has been referred to as "nitrogen-
 28     saturated" or "N-saturated".  Additions of N in any biologically-available form (NH4  ,
 29     NO3", or organic) to an N-saturated system will cause equivalent leaching  of NO3", except in
 30     those very rare systems where nitrification is inhibited by factors other than competition from
 31     heterotrophs and plants. Considering the effects of NO3' only will result in a substantial
         August 1991
10-213      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
30
31
  underestimation of the acidification potential of atmospheric deposition in N-saturated
  ecosystems.
       Vegetation demand for N depends upon a number of growth-influencing factors
  including temperature, moisture, availibility of other nutrients, and stand age.  Uptake rates
  decline as forests mature, especially after the cessation of the buildup of nutrient-rich foliar
  biomass following crown closure.  Thus,  N-saturation tends to be more common in older
  forests than in younger forests.  Processes that cause net N export from ecosystems such as
  fire and harvesting will naturally push ecosystems toward a state of lower N-saturation or
  even N deficiency. Intense fire causes a large loss of ecosystem N capital, but frequent, low
  intensity fires may have little effect.
      A review of the literature on forest fertilization and N cycling studies under various
 levels of pollutant N input reveals some interesting contrasts that pertain to the the relative
 roles of heterotrophs, plants, and nitrifiers discussed above. Forest fertilization has proven
 quite successful in producing growth increases in N-deficient forests, even though trees
 typically recover only 5-50% of fertilizer N (Table 10-33).  On an ecosystem level, however,
 retention of N is usually quite high (often 70-90% of applied N; Table 10-33), primarily due
 to fertilizer N retention in the litter and soil, including non-biological reactions between
 NH4* and humus.  Fertilization studies differ from pollutant N deposition in several
 important respects:  (1) pollutant N deposition enters the ecosystem at the canopy level
 whereas fertilizer is typically (but not always) applied to the soil, (2) fertilization leads to
 high concentrations of NH4+ and, in the case of urea, high pH, both of which are conducive
 to non-biological reactions between soil humus and NH4+,  and (3) pollutant N deposition
 enters the ecosystem as a slow,  steady input in rather low concentrations, whereas the
 fertilizer is typically applied in 1-5 large doses.  Both plants and nitrifying bacteria are
 favored by slow, steady inputs of N, possibly giving them a competative advantage over
 heterotrophs  for pollutant N inputs.  A  review of the literature on N cycling in unfertilized
 forests with differing levels of pollutant N input supports this hypothesis.  Ecosystem-level
recovery of atmospherically-deposited N (typically less than 50% and often 0%; Table 10-34
and Figure 10-33) is lower than of fertilizer N (typically 70-90% of applied N; Table 10-33
and Figure 10-34).  It also appears as if vegetation retention of incoming N in unfertilized
forests is somewhat higher than in fertilized forests whereas soil (heterotroph) retention of
        August 1991
                                         10-214     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
I
 PQ
 O
 o
CO

c
r-t


S
w
    i  ^'1'
    3  
  #   °

   S  «

jd  g J'
S3  g  6b s
   /»>  K> M«
     CO
                                                         oo oo oo oo  oo  oo
                                                         ON ON ON ON  ON  ON
                                                                            oo  ON
                                                                             en en en en en
                                                                             VO vo vo vo vo
                                                                             ~  -  ON ON ON
                                                                S3  S3  S3  S- v-' 73  T5  T5
                                                               T™^  *""!  ^3  r^!i  *rt  W3  K3  W
                                                                            •g  s  s  8
                                                                            fS  O  O  O
                                                                      T3.  ^  irH  ta  "3  "S
                                                                                  §  §
                                                                                       8  g
                                                                                       U2  W
                                                                                       33  03
                                                                                      O  O
                                                                                      •rt  -rt
                                  \T>.
                                                 O  >O  vo  ON  ON  t>
                                                                                  \o •* t> t>
                                                                                  O oo oo en
                                                                                  eN (N \o en

                                                                             O en en O CM
                      vo
                                    rf  O
CN •*
m O
CM v>
                                                 00 O)
                                                 O i-<
                                                 o »/•>
000
IT) O O
^ en vo
O
v>
                                                                        80
•* •*
CM CM
ca cs
                                                                                     O  O  O
                                                  O O O
                                                  en CN f»
                                                               O O
                                                               eSl CN
                                                                       O  O
                                                                       cS  o  en  en  en  en
                                                                                      &^  c^
                                                                                      
-------
August 1991
10-216    DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                       Ecosystem  N  Retention  vs  Fertilizer  N  Input
                     2000
            to
            c
            O
                     1000 -
                                             y = 58.682 + 0.51747x  R*2 - 0.592
                                                     1000
                                   2000
                                          Fertilizer  Input  (kg/ha)

      Figure 10-33. Ecosystem recovery of fertilizer N as a function of fertilizer N input.


1     atmospherically-deposited N is much lower. In forests with very low atmospheric N inputs,
2     it appears as if the soil is being "mined"  for the N necessary to supply vegetation, an
3     indication that plants are actually out-competing heterotrophs for N.  In forests with high
4     atmospheric N inputs, heterotrophic N uptake appears to be minimal,  perhaps because of
5     limitations by organic substrates or other nutrients.
      August 1991
10-217     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
             IX
             "m
             ^
             a
             jo
             c
             o
             o
             tr
                       Ecosystem  N  Retention  vs Atmospheric  N  Input
                        30
                        20-
                        10-
                 •10-
                       -20-
                       -30'
                              •O
                                       —T—
                                       20
                                              —r-
                                               40
                                                                                 80
                                      Atmospheric  N  Input  (kg/ha/yr)
      Figure 10-34.  Ecosystem N retention as a function of atmospheric N input.
1
2
3
4
5
6
     Since nitrification results in the creation of nitric acid within the soil, there are concerns
that elevated N inputs to N-saturated systems will result in soil acidification and aluminum
mobilization.  There are very few proven, documented cases in which excessive atmospheric
N deposition has caused  soil acidification (e.g., in forests in The Netherlands subject to very
high N deposition levels), but there is no doubt that the potential exists for many mature
forests with low uptake rates, given high enough inputs for a sufficiently long time. The
      August 1991
                                       10-218
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      greatest uncertainty in assessing and projecting rates of soil acidification is the estimation of
 2      weathering rates (i.e., the release of base cations from primary minerals).
 3           Soil acidification is usually thought of as an undesireable effect, but in some cases, the
 4      benefits of alleviating N deficiency clearly outweigh the detriments of soil acidification
 5      (e.g., the benefits of N-fixation by red alder always outweigh the detriments of soil
 6      acidification to succeeding Douglas  fir stands in the Pacific Northwest).
 7           Increased concentrations of NO3" or any other mineral acid anion (e.g., SO42", or Cl")
 8      in soil solution lead to increases in the concentrations of all cations in order to maintain
 9      charge balance in solution.  Equations describing cation exchange in soils dictate that as the
10     total anion (and cation) concentrations increase, individual cation concentrations increase as
11      follows: A13+  >  Ca2+, Mg2+  > K+, Na+, H+.  Thus, soil solution A13+  concentrations
12     increase not only as the soil acidifies  (i.e., as the proportion of A13+ on the exchange
13     complex increases) but also as the total ionic concentration of soil solution increases.
14          There are several cases in which A13+ concentrations in natural waters have been shown
                                                                                      "2 _i_
15     to be positively correlated with NO3" concentrations.  Ulrich (1983) noted NO3" - Al
16     pulses in soil solutions from the Soiling site in Germany during warm dry years.  He
17     hypothesized that these nitrate-induced A13+  pulses caused root damage and and were a major
18     contributor to forest decline observed in Germany during the mid 1980's.  This hypothesis is
19     disputed by other German forest scientists who point out that forest decline occurred on base-
20     rich as well  as base-poor soils (the base rich soils not being subject to A13+ pulses) (e.g.,
21     Rehfuess,  1987).  Van Breemen et al. (1982, 1987)  and Johnson et al. (in press) note NO3" -
22     A13+ pulses in soil solutions from forest sites in The Netherlands and in the Smoky
23     Mountains of North Carolina.  Aluminum toxicity is one of several nitrogen-related
24      hypotheses posed to explain forest decline in both countries.  Other hypotheses include
25      weather extremes  and climate change, Mg and K deficiencies which occur in sites naturally
26      low in these nutrients, and  foliar damage due to  acid mist.  Researchers on aquatic effects of
 27    •  acid deposition have long noted springtime pulses of NO3', A13 + , and H+ in  acid-affected
 28      surface waters of the Northeastern U.S. (Galloway et al.,  1980; Driscoll et al.,  1989).
 29           Increased N deposition can cause significant changes in tree physiological function,
 30      susceptibility to insect and  disease attack, and  even plant community structure.  Several
 31      hypotheses posed to explain current forest declines in eastern North America invoke the
        August 1991
10-219      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1      effects of excess N deposition upon physiological processes.  These physiological responses
  2      generally invoke altered carbohydrate allocation causing increased sensitivity to drought,
  3      frost, or insect attack.  To date, however, experimental evidence has not supported these
  4      hypotheses.
  5           Excessive NH4+ deposition to soils in which nitrification is inhibited causes serious
  6      nutrional imbalances and even toxic effects to some forests in The Netherlands (Boxman
  7      et al.,  1988).  Deleterious effects of excess N deposition can occur via aboveground
  8      processes as well:  K and Mg deficiencies in declining Dutch forests are thought to be caused
  9      by excessive foliar leaching due to high inputs of NH4+ (Roelofs et al., 1985).
10           Growth responses to increased N inputs may result in changes in species composition.
11      Species respond differentially to increased N availability, creating the potential for changes in
12      ecosystem composition with increased N loading. Changes from heathland to grassland in
13      Holland have been attributed to current rates of N deposition (Roelofs et al., 1987).
14      Ellenberg (1987) points to further species changes in Central European ecosystems as a likely
15      consequence of elevated N.  He states that "More than 50% of the  plant species in Central
16      Europe can only compete on stands that are deficient in nitrogen supply".
17           Increased N inputs can affect tree resistance to insect and desease either positively or
18      negatively.  Alleviating N deficiency may increase plant resistance  to pathogen attack, but it
19      may also reduce the production of phenols in plant tissues, thereby reducing resistance to
20      pathogen attack. To date, there is  little research to show how increased N inputs affect
21      susceptibility to pathogen attack,  but the potential for either positive or negative effects is
22      significant.
23
24      10.7.5 Effects of Nitrogen on Terrestrial Vegetation
25           Interpretation of the effects of wet and dry deposited nitrogen compounds at the
26      ecosystem level is difficult because of the interconversion of  nitrogen compounds and the
2,7      complex interactions which exist between biological, physicochemical, and climatic factors.
28      Nevertheless, reactive nitrogen compounds have been hypothesized to impact ecosystems
29      directly through modifications of individual plant physiological processes,  or indirectly
30      through alterations in the nitrogen status of the ecosystem.
        August 1991
10-220
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1           Very little information is available on the direct effects of nitric acid vapor on
 2      vegetation and essentially no information on its effects on ecosystems.  Norby et al. (1989)
 3      reported that nitric acid vapor (0.075 ppmv) induced nitrate reductase activity (NRA) in red
 4      spruce foliage.  The effects of ammonia, a reduced nitrogen gas, have been summarized by
 5      Van der Eerden (1982), however, ammonia concentrations seldom reach phytotoxic levels in
 6      the United States  (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1982).  In contrast, high ammonia
 7      concentrations in  Europe have been observed (van Dijk and Roelofs, 1988).  Van der Eerden
 8      (1982) summarized available information on the direct response of crop and tree species to
 9      ammonia fumigation and concluded that the following concentrations produced no adverse
10     effects:
11           0.107 ppmv (75/ig m'3), yearly average
12          0.858 ppmv (600 Mg m~3), daily average
13          14.3 ppmv  (10,000 ng m'3) hourly average.
14
15     Submicron,  ammonium sulfate aerosols have been shown to affect foliage of Phaseolus
                                                                                       •3
16     vulgaris L. (Gmur et al., 1983).  Three-week exposure to a concentration of 26 mg m"
17     (37 ppmv) produced leaf chlorosis, necrosis and loss of turgor.
18          Because current ambient concentrations of NO, NO2 and NH3 are low across much of
19     the United States except in certain highly populated urban areas, significant direct effects of
20     these nitrogen compounds on ecosystems seems unlikely at the current time.  Concentration
21     and effects data are unavailable for making similar conclusions regarding other reactive
22     nitrogen compounds like nitric acid vapor or the gaseous nitrate radical.
23           Serious consideration is currently being given to hypotheses that excess total nitrogen
24     deposition may impact plant productivity directly or through changes in soil chemical
25     properties.  Furthermore it has been proposed that excess nitrogen deposition to ecosystems
26      may be modifying  interplant competitive balances leading to changes in species composition
27      and/or diversity.
28           De Temmerman et al. (1988) found increased fungal outbreaks  and frost damage on
 29      several pines species exposed to very high ammonia deposition rates  (>350 kg ha"  yr" ).
 30      Numbers of species and fruiting bodies of fungi have also increased concomitantly with
 31      nitrogen deposition in Dutch forests (van  Breemen and van Dijk,  1988).  Schulze (1989)
 32      presents a clear progression of evidence which indicates that canopy uptake of nitrogen
        August 1991
10-221
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
together with root uptake has caused a nitrogen imbalance in Norway spruce leading to forest
decline.
     Excessive nitrogen inputs to terrestrial ecosystems can cause differential competitive
advantage among plants within a heathland (Heil and Bruggink,  1987; Heil et al., 1988). In
unmanaged heathlands in The Netherlands, Calluna vulagris is being replaced by grass
species, as a consequnce of the eutrophic effect of acidic rainfall and large nitrogen inputs
arising from intensive farming practices in the region. Calluna is an evergreen with a long
growing season which normally permits it to compensate for its  slow growth rate, so that it
competes successfully with the faster growing Molinia (grass)  under normal  nutrient-limiting
conditions.  However, a large increase in the nitrogen supply improves the competitive
advantage of Molinia, increasing its growth rate so that it becomes the dominant species in
the heathland. Roelofs et al. (1987) observed that nitrophilous grasses (Molinia and
Deschampsid) are displacing slower growing plants (Erica and Calluna)  on heathlands in The
Netherlands, and suggested that a correlation existed between this change and nitrogen
loading.  Van Breemen and van Dijk (1988)  found a substantial  displacement of heathland ,
plants by grasses from 1980 to 1986 and also observed increases in nitrophilous plants in
forest herb layers.  Ellenberg (1988) suggested that ionic inputs  (NO3~ and NH4+) influence
competition between organisms long before toxic effects appear on individual plants.  These
changes in The Netherlands have occurred under nitrogen loadings of between 20 and 60 kg
N ha"1 yr"1.  Liljelund and Torstensson (1988) have shown clear signs of vegetation changes
in response to nitrogen deposition rates of 20 kg ha"1  yr"1.

10.7.6 N Saturation, Critical Loads, and Current  Deposition
     Ecosystem  nitrogen saturation and the definition of the critical N deposition levels have
been the subject  of recent conferences (Nilsson and Grennfelt,. 1988;  Brown  et al.,  1988;
Skeffington and Wilson, 1988). Miller and Miller (1988) proposed three definitions for
N saturated ecosystems:
     1.    No response to additional N,
     2.    Growth reductions in response to added N or,
     3.    Added N leads to'increased losses of nitrate in streamwater.
       August 1991
                                        10-222      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7 '<
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22.
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 32
 33
 34
     They concluded that third was most reasonable'.  Brown et al. (1988), however, reported
that a recent workshop, based on a model of plant/soil N saturation put forth by Agren and
Bosatta (1988), concluded that N saturation could best be defined as occurring when N losses
from ecosystems exceeded inputs.  Aber et al. (1989) similarly define nitrogen saturation as
the availability of ammonium and nitrate in excess of total combined- plant and microbial
nutritional demands.  The concept of nitrogen saturation makes it possible to define a critical
N load (deposition rate) at which no change or deleterious impacts will occur to an ecosystem
(Nilsson, 1986).  It is important to recognize that the magnitude of such  a "critical load" will
be site and species specific because it is highly dependent on initial soil chemistries and
biological growth potentials (i.e., nitrogen demands). Skeffington and Wilson (1988) point
out that intrinsic in all definitions of a "critical load"  is the notion that there is a load at
which no long-term effects occur.  The complexity of the N cycle and ecosystem diversity
make defining a critical load for N very difficult.  The following possible criteria  may be
useful for defining appropriate critical N loads on ecosystems: .
      1.  '  Prevent nitrate levels in drinking or surface waters from rising above
            standard  levels
            Ensure proton production less than weathering rate
            Maintenance of a fixed ammonia-base cation balance
            Maintenance N inputs below N outputs (the N saturation approach)
            Minimize accelerations in the rates of ecological succession (vegetation changes
            due to altered interspecific competition).    '  !
2.
3.
4.
5.
      De Vries (1988) defined criteria for a combined critical load for nitrogen and sulfur for
 Dutch forest ecosystems using the following:   N contents of foliage, nitrate concentrations in
 groundwater, NH4/K ratios, Ca/Al ratios, and Al concentrations in soil solution.  Based on
 these criteria, De Vries concluded that current rates of N and S deposition in The Netherlands
 exceed acceptable levels.
      Schulze et al.  (1989) proposed critical loads for N deposition based on an ecosystem
 total anion and cation balance. This approach makes the assumption that processes
 determining ecosystem stability are related to soil acidification and nitrate leaching (see
 Section 10.3.6).  They concluded that in order to limit the mobilization of aluminum and
 other heavy metals  resulting from acidification and nitrate leaching (a negative result),  critical
 nitrogen deposition rates could not exceed 3-14 Kg N ha"1 yr"1 for silicate soils or 3 to
 48 kg N ha"1 yr"1 for calcareous  based soils.  Other critical loads have been proposed at rates
        August 1991
                                           10-223     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
 of nitrogen deposition ranging from as little as 1 to levels near 100 Kg N ha'1 yr"1 depending
 on the impacts considered acceptable and the criteria used to define the critical load.
      Using criteria to minimize species change, critical loads less than 30 kg ha"1 yr"1 have
 been proposed (van Breeman and van Dijk,  1988; Liljelund and Torstensson, 1988).  When
 using the criteria that ecosystem nitrogen inputs should not exceed outputs, critical loads have
 been proposed as low as 1-5 kg N ha"1 yr"1  for poor productive sites with low productivity or
 in the range from 5-30 kg N ha"1 yr"1 for sites having medium quality soils and for common
 forested systems (Boxman et al.,  1988; Rosen, 1988; Skeffington and Wilson, 1988; World
 Health Organization, 1987).
      In  summarizing the results of a recent conference on critical nitrogen loading,  after
 discussing various options for  setting a critical N load,  Skeffington and Wilson (1988)
 concluded that "we do not understand ecosystems well enough to set a critical load for
 N deposition in a completely objective fashion." Brown et al. (1988) further concluded that
 there was probably no  universal critical load definition that could be applied to all
 ecosystems, and a combination of scientific,  political, and economic considerations would be
 required for the application of the critical load concept.
      The following terrestrial  ecosystems have been suggested as being at risk from the
 deposition of nitrogen-based compounds:
      •    heathlands  with a high proportion of lichen cover,
      •    low meadow vegetation types used for extensive grazing and
           haymaking, and
      •    coniferous  forests, especially those at high altitudes (World Health
           Organization,  1987).
The above oligotrophic ecosystems are considered at risk from atmospheric nitrogen
deposition because plant species normally restricted by low nutrient concentrations could gain
a competitive advantage, and their growth at the expense of existing species would change the
 "normal" species composition and displace some species entirely (Ellenberg, 1987; Waring,
 1987). Sensitive natural ecosystems, unlike highly manipulated agricultural systems, may be
prone to  change from exposure to dry deposited nitrogen compounds because processes of
natural selection whereby tolerant individuals survive may not  be keeping pace with the
current levels of atmospheric N deposition (World Health  Organization, 1987).
       August 1991
                                        10-224     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1           There is little doubt that N deposition has a prounced effect on many if not most
 2      terrestrial ecosystems.  Since most forest ecosystems in North America are N deficient, one
 3      of the most noticeable initial changes in response to increased N deposition is likely to be a
 4      growth increase.  Whether this growth increase is deemed desireable or undesireable in a
 5      particular ecosystem is entirely a matter of management objectives (timber production or
 6      wilderness preservation), and, ultimately, value judgements by, society,  For instance,
 7      improved growth and vitality due to increased N deposition may not be deemed desireable in
 8      wilderness areas.  A blanket statement as to the benefit or damage due to N deposition cannot
 9      be made, but it is logical to assume that increased N deposition would be considered
10      beneficial, on balance,  to most North  American forests.  Exceptions to this will certainly
11      occur, and have already been noted in specific situations such as high-elevation forests with
12      low vegetation demand and high atmospheric N input.
13           However, because ecosystems have a variable capacity to buffer changes caused by
14      elevated inputs of nitrogen, it is  difficult to make general conclusions about the type and
15      extent of change (if any) currently,resulting from nitrogen deposition in North America.
16      More research needs to be conducted in this area to determine if the hypothesized effects of
17      excess nitrogen deposition are taking place and to determine the sensitivity of a wide range of
18      natural ecosystems to nitrogen loading.
19
20      10.7.7  Effects of Nitrogen on Wetlands and Bogs
21           The anaerobic (oxygen-free) nature of their waterlogged soils is the feature that sets
22      wetlands apart.  Anaerobic wetland soils favor the accumulation of organic matter and losses
23      of mineral nitrogen to the atmosphere through denitrification  reactions (the conversion of
24      nitrate to gaseous nitrogen by microbes).  Nitrogen deposition can  impact plant and microbial
25      processes either directly or indirectly by acidifying the environment. An increase in nitrogen
26      supply through atmospheric deposition or other means alters the competitive relationships
27      among plant species such that fast growing nitrophilous species (species that have a high
28      nitrogen requirement) are favored. Microbial rates of decomposition, nitrogen fixation (the
29      conversion of gaseous nitrogen to ammonium), nitrification (the conversion of ammonium to
30      nitrate), and dissimilatory nitrate reduction (conversion to gaseous nitrogen or ammonium)
31      are all affected.  Acidification below pH 4 to 5.7 blocks the nitrogen cycle by inhibiting
        August 1991
10-225
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
nitrification, and the accumulation of NH4+ (ammonium) in the environment represses
nitrogen fixation (Roelofs,  1986; Schuurkes et al., 1986, 1987; Rudd et al., 1988).  The
proportion of N2O (nitrous oxide) produced by denitrification reactions increases with
decreasing pH below 7, and the absolute rate of production of N2O increases with increasing
eutrophication (nutrient enrichment of the environment) (Focht, 1974).  This is potentially
important on a global scale because of chemical reactions with N2O in the atmosphere that
result in a loss of ozone.                •    , .
     The importance of atmospheric nitrogen deposition to the community structure (species
composition and interrelationships) of wetlands increases as rainfall increases as a fraction of
the total water budget. Primary production (plant growth) in wetlands is commonly limited
by nitrogen availability.  Primary production is proportional to the rate of internal nitrogen
cycling, which is influenced by the quantity of mineralizable soil nitrogen as well as the
supply of nitrogen to the ecosystem from the atmosphere or surface flow. Total nitrogen
inputs range from about 10 kg N ha"1 yr"1 in ombrotrophic bogs (rain-fed bogs), which
receive water only through precipitation, to 750 kg N ha"1 yr"1 or more in intertidal wetlands
with large ground and surface hydrologic inputs.
     From studies of nine North American wetlands, bulk nitrogen deposition ranges from
5.5 to  12 kg N ha"1 yr"1 and occurs in the form of NO3" (nitrate), NH4+ (ammonium), and
dissolved organic nitrogen in roughly equal proportions. More recent studies, however,
suggest that these rates are too low and that the wet deposition of NQ3" alone is greater than
15 kg N ha"1 yr"1 over much of eastern North America (Zemba et al.,  1988),  Dry
deposition, which probably accounts for greater than 50% of total deposition, adds to the
total. Leaf-capture of nitrogen  in fog droplets is a third form of deposition that is locally
important. Applications of nitrogen fertilizer in the field, ranging from 7 to
3,120 kg N ha"1 yr"1, have increased standing biomass by 6 to 413%. Other nutrients, like
phosphorus, become secondarily limiting to primary production after nitrogen inputs reach a
threshold.  Fertilization and increased atmospheric deposition have increased the dominance
of grass species over other plant species in bogs,, and extreme eutrophication is associated
with a decrease in plant species diversity.
     Single additions to vegetated wetland soils of 15N-labelled mineral nitrogen at rates of
about 100 kg N ha"1 yr"1 indicate that up to 93% of applied NH4+ is rapidly assimilated into
        August 1991
                                        10-226
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     organic matter within a single growing season.  The majority of the labelled nitrogen is lost
 2     from the system after 3 years by the combined processes of advective transport in water
 3     (carried in moving water) of paniculate organic matter, advective and' diffusive transport of
 4     dissolved nitrogen, and denitrification.  In the absence of plants, the major fate of inorganic
 5     nitrogen applied to wetland soils is loss to the atmosphere by denitrification.
 6           Peat-forming Sphagnum spp. are largely absent from bogs in western Europe where
 7     bulk deposition rates are about 20-40 kg N ha"1 yr"1, and soft water communities once
 8     dominated by isoetids in The Netherlands have been converted to later successional stages
 9     dominated by Juncus spp.  (rush) and Sphagnum spp. or to grasslands.  Heathlands dominated
10     by shrubs have also  converted to grasslands.  Experimental studies indicate mat ombrotrophic
11     bogs can be maintained if nitrogen inputs are less than 20 kg N ha"4 yr"1.  Increased
12     productivity associated with eutrophication is accompanied by increased rates of transpiration
13     (evaporation of water from leaf surfaces) which can alter wetland hydrology and influence the
14     direction of wetland succession. By this mechanism, one modelling study suggests that a
15     succession (change)  from open ombrotrophic bog to forested wetland occurs when a threshold
16     of 7 kg N ha"1 yr"1 is exceeded. These estimates are consistent with conclusions from studies
17     of species  distributions that place the limit for many species from 10 to 20 kg N ha"1 yr"1
18     (Liljelund  and Torstensson, 1988).
19        .   Fourteen percent (18 species) of the plant species from the conterminous United States
20 '    that are formally listed as endangered, and an additional 284 species listed as potentially
21     threatened (Code of Federal Regulations, 1987), are found principally in wetland habitats.
22     Some of the endangered plants, like the green pitcher plant, are known  to be adapted to
23     infertile habitats and are threatened by current levels of nitrogen deposition in parts of North
24     America.  Plant species that are threatened by high nitrogen deposition are not confined to
25     wetland habitats, however, but are common across many ecosystem types (Ellenberg,  1988).
26          '  '• -                '           '
27     10.7.8  Effects of Nitrogen on Aquatic Systems
28;          Nitrogen deposition has not historically been considered a serious  threat to the integrity
29     of aquatic ecosystems.
30           Assessment of the aquatic effects of nitrogen oxides depends on a close examination of
31    'the processes by which nitrogen may enter streams, lakes and estuaries.  Sources of nitrogen
        August 1991
10-227
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
31
 may include:  (1) atmospheric deposition directly to the water surface; (2) deposition to the
 watershed that is subsequently routed to the drainage waters; (3) gaseous uptake by plants that
 is subsequently routed, by way of litter fall and decomposition,  to drainage waters; and
 (4) nitrogen fixation, either in the water itself, or in watershed soils.  In addition, numerous
 processes act to  transform nitrogen species into forms that are only indirectly related to the
 original deposition or fixation.  These transformations include:  (1) nitrogen assimilation (the
 biological uptake of inorganic nitrogen species); (2) nitrification (the oxidation of ammonium
 to nitrate); (3) denitrification (the biological reduction of nitrate to form gaseous  forms of
 nitrogen, N2, NO, or N2O); and (4) mineralization (the decomposition of organic forms of
 nitrogen to form ammonium). The multiple sources of nitrogen to aquatic systems, and the
 complexities of nitrogen transformations in water and watersheds, have the effect of
 de-coupling nitrogen deposition from nitrogen effects, and reduce our ability to attribute
 known aquatic effects to known rates of nitrogen deposition.  While it is not currently
 possible to trace the pathway of nitrogen from deposition through any given watershed and
 into drainage waters, we can, in areas of the United States where non-atmospheric sources of
 nitrogen are small, begin to  infer cases where nitrogen deposition is having an impact on
 aquatic ecosystems.
      Any discussion of the aquatic effects of nitrogen oxides must focus on the concept of
 nitrogen saturation.  Nitrogen saturation can be defined  as a situation where the supply of
 nitrogenous compounds from the atmosphere exceeds  the demand for these compounds on the
 part of watershed plants and microbes (Skeffmgton and Wilson,  1988; Aber et al., 1989).
 Under conditions of nitrogen saturation, forested watersheds that previously retained nearly
 all of nitrogen inputs, due to a high demand for nitrogen by plants and microbes,  begin to
 supply more nitrogen to the  surface waters that drain them.  Our conceptual understanding of
 nitrogen saturation suggests that, in aquatic systems, the earliest  stages of nitrogen saturation
will be observable as increases ;in the severity and duration of springtime pulses of nitrate.
      The aquatic effects of nitrogen oxides can be divided into three general categories:
(1) acidification,  both chronic and episodic; (2) eutrophication of both freshwaters and
estuaries; and (3) directly toxic effects.
        August 1991
                                         10-228      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     10.7.8.1  Acidification
 2           Acidification effects are traditionally divided into chronic (long-term) and episodic
 3     (short-term effects usually observable only during seasons of high runoff)  effects.  Nitrate,
 4     the dominant form of inorganic nitrogen in almost all aquatic systems, is commonly present
 5     in measurable concentrations only during winter and early spring, when terrestrial demand for
 6     nitrogen is low because plants in the watershed are dormant. Nitrogen will therefore only be
 7     a problem in chronic acidification in rare cases where the process of nitrogen saturation is
 8     very  much progressed.  Chronic acidification by nitrogen can be conclusively demonstrated
 9     only  in parts of Europe (e.g., Hauhs, 1989; Hauhs et al., 1989; van Breemen and van Dijk,
10     1988).
11   .        Episodic acidification by nitrate is far more common than chronic acidification, and  is
12     well-documented for streams (Driscoll et al., 1987b) and lakes (Galloway et al., 1980;
13     Driscoll et al., 1991; Schaefer et al., 1990) in the Adirondack Mountains, for streams  in the
14     Catskill Mountains (Stoddard and Murdoch, 1991; Murdoch and Stoddard, in review), and in
15     a small proportion of lakes in Vermont (Stoddard and Kellogg, in press),  as well as in many
16     parts of Canada (Jeffries, 1990) and Europe (e.g., Hauhs et al., 1989).
17           Based on intensive monitoring data, it is possible to divide lakes and streams into three
18     groups, based on their seasonal NO3" behavior.  In many parts of the country, nitrogen
19     demand on the part of the terrestrial ecosystem is sufficiently high that no leakage of NO3"
20   '  from watersheds occurs, even when nitrogen deposition rates are relatively high, and cold
21     temperatures should limit the biological demand for nitrogen.  Lakes and  streams in these
22     areas show no evidence that nitrogen deposition is producing adverse aquatic effects.
23           In a second group of lakes and streams, NO3~ concentrations show strong seasonally,
24     with  peak concentrations during snow melt, or following large rain events.  In many cases,
25     these episodic increases in NO3~, along with already low baseline acid neutralizing capacity
26     (ANC), are sufficient to cause short-term acidification and potential adverse biological
27     effects.  It is important to note that seasonal increases in NO3~ concentrations can be
28     produced by normal watershed processes; lowered terrestrial demand  for nitrogen during the
29     dormant season, for example, creates a strong likelihood that springtime drainage waters will
30     show NO3" concentrations that are elevated over summer and fall concentrations.
31     Mineralization of organic matter during the cold  months of winter,  coupled with low
        August 1991
10-229
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     biological demand for nitrogen, can produce high winter concentrations of NO3" in soil water
  2     that is subsequently flushed into drainage waters during spring snow melt or during large rain
  3     storms.  While the seasonal pattern of elevated NO3" concentrations in this group of lakes and
  4     streams can be considered normal, the severity of the NO3" episodes that these systems
  5     experience can be strongly influenced by the amount of nitrogen stored in the snow pack over
  6     the course of the winter.  If biological demand for nitrogen is still low at the onset of snow
  7     melt,  the entire store of snowpack NO3" can be flushed into drainage waters in the very early
  8     stages of snow melt (e.g., Johannessen and Henriksen, 1978; Jeffries,  1990).
  9          The third group of lakes and streams exhibits both the strong seasonally in NO3"
 10     concentration described in the previous paragraph, and increasing trends in NO3"
 11     concentrations. Because the early stages of nitrogen saturation are expected to produce
 12     increases in NO3" concentrations,  especially during episodes, long-term increases in NO3"
 13     may represent the strongest evidence that nitrogen deposition is responsible for aquatic
 14     effects.  In all cases where increasing trends in NO3" have been documented in the
 15     United States (Smith et al., 1987; Stoddard and Murdoch,  1991; Murdoch and Stoddard, in
 16     review;  Driscoll et al., in review) they have occurred at a time when nitrogen deposition is
 17     relatively constant (e.g., Simpson and Olsen, 1990).  Increased leakage of NO3~ from
 18     watersheds in these areas therefore represents a long-term decrease in the ability of
 19     watersheds to retain nitrogen.  A likely cause of such long-term changes is a lowering in the
20     demand for nitrogen as a nutrient on the part of the terrestrial ecosystem,  which may result
21     from long-term high rates of nitrogen deposition to affected watersheds (e.g., Aber et al.,
22     1989), forest maturation (Elwood et al., 1991), or, more likely, a combination of both
23     factors.
24          The locations of lake and streams sites in each  of the three NO3" groups are shown on
25     maps of the Northeast (Figure 10-35) the Southeast (Figure 10-36) and the West
26     (Figure  10-37).  In order to assess which lake and stream sites fall into each group, it was
27     necessary to have data collected over several years (at least 3 years), and on a relatively
28     intensive sampling schedule (at least 4 times per year, to illustrate seasonal patterns).  These *
29     criteria exclude many sources of data, most notable those from the National Surface Water
30     Survey (Linthurst et al., 1986; Landers et al., 1987; Kaufmann et al.,  1988), and limit the
31      conclusions that can be drawn concerning the spatial extent of aquatic effects attributable to
        August 1991
10-230
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                    o  Data indicate no influence of NOj

                    •  Data indicate strong influence of N

                    *  Data indicate strong influence of NO"
                          and increasing trend in NO"
                             Pennsylvania

                            cP
      Figure 10-35. Location of acid-sensitive lakes and streams in the northeastern United
                    States where the importance of NO3" to seasonal water chemistry can be
                    determined.  Data from: Kahl et al. (1991); Wigington et al. (1989);
                    Driscoll et al. (1987a); DriscoU et al. (in review); Kramer et al. (1986);
                    Murdoch and Stoddard (in review); Eshleman and Hemond (1985);
                    Morgan and Good (1988); Baird et al. (1987); Likens (1985); Sharpe
                    et al. (1984); Stoddard and Kellogg (in press); DeWalle et al. (1988);
                    Barker and Witt (1990); Schofield et al. (1985); Phillips and Stewart
                    (1990).
1     nitrogen deposition.  None-the-less, the maps illustrate the existence of severe problems in

2     the Northeast (especially the Adirondack and Catskill,Mountains), and the Southeast (in the

3     Mid-Appalachians and Great Smoky Mountains), and the potential for future problems in the

4     West.
      August 1991
10-231     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                   O  Data Indicate no Influence of NOJ

                   •  Data Indicate strong influence of NO'

                   *  Data Indicate strong influence of NO 3
                         and Increasing trend in NO'
                                                                            N
      Figure 10-36.  Location of acid-sensitive lakes and streams in the southeastern United
                     States where the importance of NO3" to seasonal water chemistry can be
                     determined.  Data from:  Elwood et al. (1991); Cosby et al. (1991);
                     Elwood and Turner (1989); Buell and Peters (1988); Swank and Waide
                     (1988); Jones et al. (1983); Silsbee and Larson (1982); Katz et al. (1985);
                     Weller et al. (1986); Wigington et al. (1989); Kramer et al. (1986);
                     Edwards and Helvey (1991).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
     It is also possible to draw correlations between rates of nitrogen deposition, and rates of
                                                                                     »
nitrogen loss from watersheds; while these analyses cannot indicate causal relationships, they

can suggest patterns that merit further attention. Two independent attempts have been made

to relate deposition and watershed nitrogen export in the United States, and both suggest

similar conclusions.  Kaufmann et al. (1991) used data from the National Stream Survey

(NSS; Kaufmann et al., 1988) and interpolated wet deposition values (of N03" + NH4+) to

correlate deposition and surface water dissolved inorganic nitrogen concentrations
      August 1991
                                        10-232      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                                 o  Data indicate no influence of NOj
                                                 •  Data indicate strong influence of
                                                 *  Data indicate strong influence of
                                                        and increasing trend in NOj
                                                                       N
      Figure 10-37.  Location of acid-sensitive lakes and streams in the western United States
                     where the importance of NO3" to seasonal water chemistry can be
                     determined.  Data from:  Melack and Stoddard (1991); Stoddard (1987a);
                     Loranger et al. (1986); Wigmgton et al. (1989); Kramer et al. (1986);
                     Welch et al. (1986); Eilers et al. (1990); Gilbert et al. (1989).
1
2
3
4
5
(NO3~ + NH4+) in large physiographic regions of the eastern United States (Figure 10-38a).
The NSS was a probability-based sample of streams, sampled at spring base flow in 1987;
because it is probability-based, the results from the relatively small number of streams
sampled in the NSS can be extrapolated to the population of streams within each of the
9 regions sampled.  The results of the correlation suggest a strong correspondence between
       August 1991
                                        10-233
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                      te
                      I

                          0-
                                  100    200    300    400

                                  Wet NCT + NH4* Deposition (eq/ha/yr)
                      500
f

tr
„
1
oc


if
i
I


350-
300-
250-
200-


150-
100-
50.
0-

o

0 0
°0
o
o

0
8 ° o
O o
O ° n ^ ° O
^-0 	 000? 	 , 	 °? ' ° °. 
-------
 1     median wet deposition of nitrogen in a region, and the median spring base-flow concentration
 2     of nitrogen in a region.  In addition, the results suggest a threshold rate of wet nitrogen
 3     deposition of approximately 2.8 kg N ha"1 yr'1 above which significant losses of nitrogen
 4     from watersheds can begin to occur.
 5          Driscoll et al. (1989a) collected input/output budget data for a large number of
 6     undisturbed forested watersheds in the United States and Canada, and summarized the
 7     relationship between nitrogen export (of NO3") and wet nitrogen deposition (of
 8     NO3" +  NH4+).  These data are supplemented in Figure 10-38b with some published
 9     input/output data that were not included in the original figure.  Driscoll et al. (1989a) stress
10     that the data were collected using widely differing methods and over various time scales
11     (from one year to several decades).  Like the data of Kaufmann et al. (1991, Figure 10-38a),
12     these budget data suggest a threshold rate of wet nitrogen deposition of ca. 2.8 kg N ha'1 yr"1
13     above which significant export of NO3" from watersheds may occur.
14
15     10.7.8.2 Eutrophication
16           Assigning responsibility for  the eutrophication of lakes and estuaries to nitrogen oxides
17     requires a determination of two key conditions.  The first is that the productivity of the
18     aquatic system be limited by the availability of nitrogen, rather than by some other nutrient or
19     physical factor.  The second is that nitrogen deposition be a significant source of nitrogen to
20     the system.  In many cases of eutrophication, the supply of nitrogen  from deposition is minor
21      when compared to other anthropogenic sources,  such as pollution from either point or non-
22      point sources.
23          ; It is generally accepted that the productivity of fresh waters is limited by the availability
24      of phosphorus, rather than the availability of nitrogen (reviewed by Hecky and Kilham,
25      1988).  Conditions of nitrogen limitation do occur in lakes, but are often either transitory, or
26      the result of high inputs of .phosphorus from anthropogenic sources.  Often when nitrogen
 27  -    limitation does occur it is a short-term phenomenon, because nitrogen-deficient conditions
 28      favor the growth of nitrogen-fixing blue green algae (e.g., Smith, 1982). Because nitrogen-
 29      fixing species are not limited by the availability of fixed nitrogen (e.g., NH4+ or NO3") they
 30     may thrive under conditions where other species are nitrogen limited, and effectively increase
 31      rates of nitrogen input to the system (by fixation of gaseous nitrogen) beyond the levels
         August 1991
10-235      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1     where system productivity can be said to be nitrogen limited.  It appears that nitrogen
  2     limitation may occur naturally (i.e., in the absence of anthropogenic phosphorus inputs) in
  3     lakes with very low concentrations of both nitrogen and phosphorus, as are common in the
  4     western United States, and in the Northeast.  Suttle and Harrison (1988) and Stockner and
  5     Shortreed (1988) suggest that phosphorus concentrations are too low in these systems to allow
  6     blue green algae to thrive, because they are poor competitors for phosphorus at very low
  7     concentrations.  Results of the National Surface Water Survey (NSWS; Kanciruk et al., 1986;
  8     Eilers et al.,  1987) suggest that the largest number of potentially nitrogen limited lakes in the
  9     United States occur in the West (20-30% of the population of lakes sampled by NSWS),  and
 10     particularly in the Pacific Northwest, although significant numbers may also occur in the
 11     Upper Midwest (15-25% of population).  In all cases, because the concentrations of both
 12     nitrogen and phosphorus are low, additional inputs of nitrogen may have a limited potential to
 13     cause eutrophication, because their input will quickly lead to a switch in the limiting nutrient;
 14     additions of nitrogen to these systems would soon lead to nitrogen-sufficient and
 15     phosphorus-deficient conditions.  Increases in nitrogen deposition to some regions would
 16     probably lead to measurable increases in algal biomass in lakes with both low concentrations
 17     of dissolved nitrogen and substantial concentrations of phosphorus, but the number of lakes
 18     that meet these criteria naturally (i.e., that do not have large anthropogenic inputs of
 19     phosphorus) is likely to be quite small.
20          Few topics in aquatic biology have received as much attention in the past decade as the
21     debate over whether estuarine and coastal ecosystems are limited by nitrogen, phosphorus, or
22     some other factor (reviewed by Hecky and Kilham, 1988).  Numerous geochemical and
23     experimental studies have suggested that nitrogen limitation is much more common in
24     estuarine and  coastal  waters than in freshwater systems. Experiments to confirm widespread
25     nitrogen limitation in estuaries have not been conducted, however, and nitrogen limitation
26     cannot be assumed to be the rule. Taken as a whole, the productivity of estuarine waters of
27     the United States correlates more closely with supply rates of nitrogen than of other nutrients
28     (Nixon and Pilson,  1983). Specific instances of phosphorus limitation (Smith,  1984) and of
29     seasonal switching between nitrogen and phosphorus limitation (D'Elia et al., 1986; McComb
30     et al., 1981) have been observed and stand as exceptions to the general rule of  nitrogen
31      limitation in marine ecosystems.  Nitrogen-fixing  blue green algae are rarely abundant in
        August 1991
10-236
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     estuarine waters (Howarth et al.,  1988a), and so nitrogen-deficient conditions may continue
 2     indefinitely in these systems, unless nitrogen supply exceeds the biological demand for
 3     nitrogen.
 4    '      Estimation of the contribution of nitrogen deposition to the eutrophication of estuarine
 5     and coastal waters is made difficult by the multiple direct anthropogenic sources (e.g., from
 6     agriculture and sewage) of nitrogen against which the importance of atmospheric sources must
 7     be weighed.  Estuaries and coastal areas are natural locations for cities and ports, and most of
 8     the watersheds of major estuaries in the United States have been substantially developed.  The
 9     crux of any assessment of the importance of nitrogen deposition to estuarine eutrophication is
10"''   establishing the relative importance of direct anthropogenic effects (e.g., sewage and
11   '  agricultural runoff) and indirect effects (e.g., atmospheric deposition). In the United States,
12     a large effort has been made to establish the relative importance of sources of nitrogen to the
13     Chesapeake Bay (e.g., D'Elia et al.,  1982; Smullen  et al., 1982; Fisher et al., 1988; Tyler,
14     1988).  Estimates of the contribution  of nitrogen to the Chesapeake Bay from each individual
15     source are very uncertain;  estimating  the proportion  of nitrogen deposition exported from
16     forested watersheds is especially problematic but critical to the analysis, because ca.  80% of
17     the Chesapeake Bay basin is forested. Nonetheless,  three attempts at determining  the
18     proportion of the total NO3" load to the Bay attributable to nitrogen deposition all  produce
19     estimates in the range of 18 to 31% (Table  10-35).  Supplies of nitrogen from deposition
20     exceed supplies from all other non-point sources to the Bay (e.g., agricultural runoff,
21     pastureland runoff, urban runoff), and only point source inputs represent a greater input than
22     deposition.
23
24      10.7.8.3  Direct Toxicity
25           Toxic effects of nitrogen on aquatic biota result from un-ionized ammonia (NH3), which
26      occurs in equilibrium with ionized ammonium (NH4+) and OH".  Ammonia concentrations
27      approach toxic concentrations most commonly at high pH and temperature values, which are
28      most typical of heavily polluted lakes and streams (e.g., Effler et al., 1990).  In the well-
29      oxygenated conditions typical of unpolluted lakes and streams (as well as in most  watersheds)
30     NH4+ is rapidly oxidized to NO3~, which does not have toxic effects on aquatic organisms.
31      Within the typical range of pH and temperature that unpolluted lakes and streams  experience,
        August 1991
10-237      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   TABLE 10-35.  THREE NITROGEN BUDGETS FOR THE CHESAPEAKE BAY
Source of
Nitrogen
Direct Deposition
NO/
NH4
N Load to Bay (from direct
deposition)11
Forests
NO3" Deposition
NH4+ Deposition
Watershed Rentention
In-stream Retention
Atmospheric NO3' Load to
Bay (from forests)
N Load to Bay (from
forests)b
Pastureland
NO3" Deposition
NHL,* Deposition
Animal Wastes
Watershed Retention
In-stream Retention
Atmospheric NO3" Load to
Bay (from pastures)
N Load to Bay (from
pastures)1"
Cropland
NO3" Deposition
NIL,* Deposition
Fertilizers
Watershed Retention
In-stream Retention
Atmospheric NO3" Load to
Bay (from cropland)
N Load to Bay (from
cropland)11
Residential/Urban
NO3" Deposition
NIL,* Deposition
Watershed Retention
In-stream Retention
Atmospheric NO3' Load to
Bay (from urban areas)
N Load to Bay (from urban
areas)b
EDF
Budget
(eq X 109 • yf1

0.6
0.3
0.9


6.4
3.5
80%
50%
0.6
1.0



1.7
0.9
13.9
95 %c
50%°
0.5

1.1


1.8
., 1.0
11.3
70%
70%
0.6

i 4.2


0.3
0.2
35%
0%
0.2

0.3

Versar
Budget
(eq X 109 • yr-1

0.5
_a
0.5


6.0 ;
_a
95%
• 50%-..
0.15
0.15



1.2
'_« • • • '• •
8.4
94-99%
50%
0.01-0.04

0.05-0.3


2.0
a
5.9-19.3
76-99%
50%
0.0-0.2

0.04-2.6


0.5
-a
62-96%
20%
0.01-0.1

0.01-0.1

Refined
Budget
(eq X ,109 • yr-1

0.4
0.2
> 0.6


4-6
2.5
84.6%
0.5 35%
0.7




0.9
0.5
13.9
95 %d
35%
0.09

0.6


1.5
0.8
11.3
95%
35%
0.05

0.4


0.4
0.2
50%
35%
0.1
0.2


August 1991
10-238
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                 TABLE 10-35 (cont'd).  THREE NITROGEN BUDGETS FOR THE
                                         CHESAPEAKE BAY

Source of
Nitrogen
Point Sources
NO3- LOAD TO BAY
(FROM DEPOSITION
TOTAL NITROGEN LOAD
TO BAY"
% of N from NO3" depostion
EDF
Budget
(eq X 109 • yr-1
2.4
2.50

9.95


Versar
Budget
(eq X 109 • yfj
1.4-2.3
0.67-1.06

2.16-5.90

25%
Refined
Budget
(eq X 109 • yr'1
2.4 :
1.09

4.87

18-31%








22.5%
      "The Versar Budget (Tyler, 1988) does not calculate loads of NH4+.                ;
      bFor the EDF Budget (Fisher et al., 1988a) and refined budget total nitrogen load to the Bay includes both NO3'
       andNH4+. The Versar Budget (Tyler, 1988) includes only NO3".
      "Watershed and In-stream retention values for pastureland in the EDF Budget apply only to animal wastes.  For
       atmospheric deposition, the cropland retention value (70%) was used.             •
      d95% retention was used for animal wastes; 85% retention was used for deposition (see text).   .,
      The range of contributions of NO3" deposition to the total budget were calculated by comparing maximum to
       maximum estimates, and minimum to minimum estimates.  These combinations are more likely to occur during
       extreme (e.g., very wet or very dry) years.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7
toxic concentrations of NH3 .resulting from nitrogen deposition would be extremely unusual.
At a pH of 7, and a temperature of 15 °C, for example, concentrations of total NH4+ would
have to reach over 750 /imol • L"1 before chronically toxic concentrations of free NH3 would
develop.  Currently no areas of North America are known to experience rates of nitrogen
deposition that are sufficient to produce such high concentrations of total NH4+ in surface

waters.
       August 1991
                                           10-239
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 REFERENCES

 Abd. Aziz, S. A.; Nedwell, D. B.  (1986a) The nitrogen cycle of an east coast, U.K., saltmarsh: I. nitrogen
         assimilation during primary production; detrital mineralization. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 22: 559-575.

 Abd. Aziz, S. A.; NedweU, D. B.  (1986b) The nitrogen cycle of an east coast, U.K. saltmarsh: II. nitrogen
         fixation, nitrification, denitrification, tidal exchange. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 22: 689-704.

 Abeles, F. B.; Craker, L.  E.; Forrence, L. E.; Leather, G. R. (1971) Fate of air pollutants: removal of ethylene,
         sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide by soil. Science (Washington, DC) 173: 914-916.

 Aber, J. D.; Melillo, J. M. (1982)  Nitrogen immobilization in decaying hardwood leaf litter as a function of
         initial nitrogen and lignin content. Can. J. Bot. 60: .2263-2269.'

 Aber, J. D.; Nadelhoffer, K. J.; Steudler, P.; Melillo, J. M. (1989) Nitrogen saturation in northern forest
         ecosystems: excess nitrogen from fossil fuel combustion may stress the biosphere. Bioscience 39-
         378-386.

 Aerts, R.; Berendse, F. (1988) The effect of increased nutrient availability on vegetation dynamics in wet
        heathlands. Vegetatio 76: 63-69.

 Aerts, R.; Berendse, F. (1989) An analysis of competition in heathland ecosystems. L Competition for nutrients.
        In: Aerts, R. Plant strategies and nutrient cycling in heathland ecosystems [Ph.D dissertation]. Utrecht,
        The Netherlands: University of Utrecht; pp. 147-161.

 Aerts, R.; de Caluwe,  H.;  Schmitz, M. (1989) An analysis of competition in heathland ecosystems. II.
        Competition for light. la: Aerts, R. Plant strategies and nutrient cycling in heathland ecosystems [Ph.D
        dissertation]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: University of Utrecht; pp. 165-180.                !

 Agren, G. I.; Bosatta,  E. (1988) Nitrogen saturation of terrestrial ecosystems. Environ. Pollut. 54: 185-197.
                       i             ,             '  •
 Alexander, M. (1963) Soil  microbiology. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.

 Alexander, M. (1977) Introduction to soil microbiology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons-
        pp. 225-230; 239-246; 272-286; 355-356.

 Altshuller, A. P.; Linthurst, R. A.,  eds. (1984) Acidic deposition phenomenon and its effects: critical assessment
        review papers;  volume I, atmospheric sciences; volume II, effects sciences. Washington, DC: U. S.
        Environmental  Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development; EPA report nos.
        EPA/600/8-83/016aF-bF. Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB85-100030 and PB85-100048.

 Altwicker, E. R.; Shanaghan, P. E.; Johannes, A. H. (1986) Atmospheric deposition to remote receptors:
        HI. statistical analysis of precipitation data from the ILWAS-network. Water Air Soil Pollut. 28: 71-88.

 Anderson,  I.  C.; Levine, J. S. (1987) Simultaneous field measurements of biogenic emissions of nitric oxide and
        nitrous oxide. J. Geophys. Res. [Atmos.]  92: 965-976.          ,   .

Aneja, V. P.; Rogers, H. H.; Stahel, E. P. (1986) Dry deposition of ammonia at environmental concentrations
        on selected plant species. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 36: 1338-1341.

Appel, B. R.; Tokiwa,  Y. (1981) Atmospheric particulate nitrate sampling errors due to reactions with particulate
        and gaseous strong acids. Atmos. Environ. 15: 1087-1089.                   •
 August 1991
10-240  ,     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Armentano, T. V.; Menges, E. S. (1986) Patterns of change in the carbon balance of organic soil-wetlands of the
       temperate zone. J. Ecol. 74: ,755-774.  •                                       •.  :

Aronsson, A.; Elowson, S. (1980) Effects of irrigation and fertilization on mineral nutrients in Scots pine
       needles. In: Persson, T., ed. Structure and function of northern coniferous forests - an ecosystem study.
       Ecol. Bull. 32: 219-228.                                                           .

Aston, S. R.  (1980) Nutrients, dissolved gases, and general  biochemistry in estuaries. In: Olausson, E.; Cato, I.,
       eds. Chemistry and biogeochemistry  of estuaries. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley and Sons;
       pp. 233-262.                   •                                         '

Atlas, R. M.; Bartha, R. (1981) Microbial ecology:  fundamentals and applications. Reading, MA:
       Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Bache, D. H. (1979a) Particle transport within plant canopies - I. a framework for analysis. Atmos. Environ.
        13: 1257-1262.

Bache, D. H. (1979b) Particulate transport within plant canopies - II. prediction of deposition velocities. Atmos.
       Environ.  13: 1681-1687.

Baird, S. F.; Buso, D. C.; Hornbeck, J. W. (1987)  Acid pulses from snowmelt  at acidic Cone Pond, New
       Hampshire. Water Air Soil Pollut. 34: 325-338.

Baker, L. A. (1991) Regional estimates of atmospheric dry deposition. In: Charles, D. F.,  ed. Acidic deposition
        and aquatic ecosystems: regional case 'studies.  New York,  NY: Springer-Verlag; Appendix C: hi press.

Baker, J. P.; Christensen, S. W.  (1991) Effects of acidification on biological communities in aquatic ecosystems.
        In: Charles, D. F., ed. Acidic deposition and  aquatic ecosystems: regional case studies. New York, NY:
        Springer-Verlag.                                                               •'.'•/.

Baker, L. A.; Kaufmann, P. R.; Herlihy, A. T.;  Eilers, J. M. (n.d.) Current status of surface water acid-base
        chemistry. National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program; state of the science/technology report 9: in
        press.             •                                                        •

Baker, J. B.; Switzer, G. L.; Nelson, L. E. (1974) Biomass production and nitrogen recovery after fertilization
        of young loblolly pines. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 38: 958-961.

Baker, T. G.; Oliver, G. R.; Hodgkiss, P. D. (1986)  Distribution and cycling of nutrients in Pinus radiata  as
        affected by past lupin growth and fertiliser.  For. Ecol. Manage.  17:  169-187.

 Baker, J. P.; Freda, J.; Christensen, S. W.; Sale, M-, J- (1989) Biological effects of changes in surface water
        .acid-base chemistry. Washington, DC: National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program;
        state-of-science/technology report 13.

 Baldocchi, D. (1988) A multi-layer model for estimating sulfur dioxide deposition to a deciduous oak forest
        canopy. Atmos.  Environ. 22: 869-884.

 Baldocchi, D. D.; Hicks, B. ,B.; Camara, P. (1987) A canopy stomatal resistance model for gaseous deposition to
        vegetated surfaces. Atmos. Environ. 21: 91-101.

 Baldocchi, D. D.; Hicks, B. B.; Meyers, T..P. (1988) Measuring biosphere-atmosphere exchanges of biologically
        related gases with micrometeorological methods. Ecology 69:  1331-1340.
   August 1991
10-241
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Barbour, M. G.; Burk, J. H.; Pitts, W. D. (1980) Terrestrial plant ecology. 'Menlo Park, CA: The
        Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, lac.; pp. 10-11,267-270:     '

 Barker, J. L.;'Witt, E. C. (1990) Effects of acidic precipitation on the water quality of streams in the Laurel Hill
        area, Somerset County, Pennsylvania, 1983-1986. Harrisburg,  PA: U. S.  Geological Survey, Water
        Resources Investigations; report 89-4113.

 Barrie, L. A.; Sirois, A. (1986) Wet and dry deposition of sulphates and nitrates in eastern Canada: 1979-1982.
        Water Air Soil. Pollut. 30: 303-310.

 Bayley, S. E.; Vitt, D. H.; Newbury, R. W.; Beaty, K. G.; Behr, R.; Miller, C. (1987) Experimental
        acidification of a Sphagnum-dominated peatland: first year results. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44(suppl.  1):
        194-205.                              ._..,-...-

 Begon, M.; Harper, J. L.; Townsend, C. R. (1986) Ecology: individuals; populations,  and communities.
        Sunderland, MA: Sinauef Associates, Inc.

 Bennett, M. (1988) A simple physical model of dry deposition to a rough surface. Atmos. Environ.
       22: 2701-2705.

 Bennett, J. H.; Hill, A. C. (1973) Absorption of gaseous air pollutants by a standardized plant canopy. J. Air
       Pollut. Control Assoc. 23: 203-206.

 Berendse, F. (1985) The effect of grazing on the outcome of competition between plant species with different
       nutrient  requirements. Oikos 44: 35-39.

 Berendse, F.;  Aerts, R. (1984) Competition between Erica tetralix L. and Molinia caerulea (L.) Moench as
       affected  by the availability of nutrients. Acta Oebol.  O'ecol. Plant. 5: 3-14.

 Berger, M. G.; Klaus, R. E.; Fock, H. P. (1986) Assimilation of gaseous ammonia by  sunflower leaves during
       photosynthesis. Aust. J. Plant Physiol.  13: 211-219.

 Betlach, M. R.;  Tiedje, J. M. (1981) Kinetic explanation for accumulation of nitrite, nitric oxide, and nitrous
       oxide during bacterial denitrification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 42: 1074-1084.

 Biggar, C. M.; Cole, D. W. (1983) Effects of harvesting intensity on nutrient losses and future productivity in
       high and low productivity red alder and Douglas-fir  stands. In:  Ballard, R.; Gessel, S. P., eds.
       I.U.F.R.O. symposium on forest site and continuous productivity. Portland, OR: U. S.  Forest Station,
       Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station; U. S.  Forest Service general technical report no.
       PNW-163.

 Biggs, R. B.;  Cronin, L. E. (1981) Special characteristics of estuaries.  In: Neilson, B. J.; Cronin, L. E., eds.
       Estuaries and nutrients. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press;  pp. 3-23.

 Bilby, R. E.; Likens, G. E. (1979) Effect of hydrologic fluctuations on the transport of fine particulate organic
       carbon in a small stream. Limnol. Oceanogr. 24: 69-75.

 Billings, W. D. (1978) Plants and the ecosystem. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc.;
       pp. 1-62, 83-108.

Binkley, D. (1986) Forest nutrition management. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Blackmer, A. M.; Bremner, J. M. (1978) Inhibitory effect of nitrate on reduction of N2O to N2 by soil
       microorganisms. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10:  187-191.
 August 1991
10-242       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Bockheim, J. G.; Leide, J.tE,; Tavella, D. S. (1986) Distribution and cycling of macronutrients in aPinus
       resinosa plantation fertilized with nitrogen and.potassium. Can. J. For. Res, 16: 778-785.

Bolin, B.; Arrhenius, E., eds.  (1977) Nitrogen - an essential life factor and a growing environmental hazard:
       report from Nobel symposium no. 38. Ambio 6: 96-105.

Bolle, H.-J.; Seiler, W.; Bolin, B. (1986) Other greenhouse gases and aerosols: assessing their role for
       atmospheric radiative transfer. In: Bolin, B.; Doos, B. R.; Jager, J.; Warrick, R. A., eds. The
       greenhouse effect, climatic change, and ecosystems. SCOPE 29. Chichester, United Kingdom: John
       Wiley and Sons; pp. 157-203.

Bondietti, E. A.; Baes, C. F., Ill; McLaughlin, S. B. (1989) Radial trends in cation ratios in tree rings as
       indicators of the impact of atmospheric deposition on forests. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 586-594.

Boring, L. R.; Swank, W. T.; Waide, J. B.; Henderson, G, S. (1988) Sources, fates, and impacts of nitrogen
       inputs to terrestrial ecosystems: review and synthesis. Biogeochemistry 6:  119-159.

Bormann, F. H. (1982) The effects of air pollution on the New England landscape.  Ambio 11:  338-346.

Bormann, F. H.; Likens, G. E.; Melillo, J. M. (1977) Nitrogen budget for an aggrading northern hardwood
        forest ecosystem. Science (Washington, DC) 196: 981-983.

Bosatta,  E.; Berendse, F. (1984) Energy or nutrient regulation of decomposition: implications for the
        mineralization-immobilization response to perturbations. Soil Biol. Biochem. 16: 63-6?.

 Bosatta, E.; Staaf, H. (1982) The control of nitrogen turn-over in forest litter. Oikos 39: 143-151.

 Boston,  H. L. (1986) A discussion of the adaptations for carbon acquisition in relation to the growth strategy of
       ' aquatic isoetids. Aquat. Bot. 26: 259-270.

 Bowden, W. B. (1986) Gaseous nitrogen emissions  from undisturbed terrestrial ecosystems: an assessment of
        their impacts on local and global nitrogen budgets. Biogeochemistry 2: 249-279.

 Bowden, W. B. (1987) The biogeochemistry of nitrogen in freshwater wetlands. Biogeochemistry 4: 313-348.

 Bowden, W. B.; Bormann, F. H. (1986) Transport and loss of nitrous oxide in soil water after forest
         clear-cutting. Science (Washington, DC) 233: 867-869.

 Bowersox, V. C.; Sisterson, D. L.; Olsen, A. R. (1990) Acid rain, a world-wide phenomenon: a perspective
         from the United States. Int.  J. Environ. Stud. 36:  83-101.

 Boxman, D.; van Dijk, H.; Houdijk, A.; Roelofs, J. (1988> Critical loads for nitrogen with special emphasis on
         ammonium.  In: Nilsson, J.; Grennfelt, P., eds. Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen: report from a
         workshop; March; Skokloster, Sweden. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers;
         pp. 295-322.

 Boyle, J. R.; Ek, A. R. (1972) An evaluation of some effects of bole and branch pulpwood harvesting on site
         macronutrients.  Can.  J. For. Res. 2: 407-412.

 Boyle, J. R.; Voigt, G. K. (1973) Biological weathering of silicate minerals:  implications for tree nutrition and
         soil genesis. Plant Soil 38:. 191-201.
   August 1991
10-243       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  Boynton, W. R.; Kemp, W. M.; Keefe, C. W. (1982) A comparative analysis of nutrients and other factors
         influencing estuarine phytoplankton production. In: Estuarine comparisons. New York, NY: Academic
         Press, Inc.; pp. 69-90.

  Brakke, D. F.; Henriksen, A.; Norton, S. A. (1989) Estimated background concentrations of sulfate in dilute
         lakes. Water Resour. Bull. 25: 247-253.

  Brinson, M. M.  (1977) Decomposition and nutrient exchange of litter in an alluvial swamp forest  Ecology
         58: 601-609.

  Brinson, M. M.; Bradshaw, H. D.; Kane, E. S. (1984) Nutrient assimilative capacity of an alluvial floodplain
        swamp. J. Appl. Ecol. 21: 1041-1057.

 Broecker, W. S.; Peng, T.-H. (1982) Tracers in the sea. Eldigio.

 Brown, D. J. A.  (1988) Effect of atmospheric N deposition on surface water chemistry and the implications for
        fisheries. Environ. Pollut. 54: 275-284.

 Brown, K. A.; Freer-Smith, P. H.; Howells, G. D.; Skeffington, R. A.; Wilson, R. B. (1988) Rapporteurs'
        report on discussions at the workshop on excess nitrogen deposition, Leatherhead, September 1987. In:
        Dempster, J. P.; Manning, W. J.; Skeffington, R. A., eds. Excess nitrogen deposition: [papers from the
        workshop]; September 1987; Leatherhead, Surrey, United Kingdom. Environ. Pollut. 54: 285-295.

 Brunsting, A. M. H.; Heil, G. W. (1985) The role of nutrients in the interactions between a herbivorous beetle
        and some competing plant species in heathlands. Oikos 44: 23-26.

 Buckman, H.  O.; Brady, N. C. (1969) The nature and property of soils. 7th. ed. New York,  NY: The
        Macmillan Company; pp. 437-462.

 Buell, G. R.;  Peters, N. E. (1988) Atmospheric deposition effects on the chemistry of a stream in northeastern
        Georgia. Water Air Soil Pollut. 39: 275-291.

 Buijsman, E. (1987) Ammonia emission calculation: fiction and reality. In: Asman, W. A. H.; Diederen,
        H. S.  M.  A., eds. Ammonia and acidification: proceedings [of a] symposium of the European
        Association for the Science of Air Pollution (EURASAP); April; Bilthoven, The Netherlands. European
        Association for the Science of Air Pollution; pp. 13-27.

 Buijsman, E.; Erisman, J.-W. (1987) Wet deposition of ammonium in Europe. In: Asman, W. A. H.; Diederen,
        H. S.  M.  A., eds. Ammonia and acidification: proceedings of a symposium of the European Association
        for the Science of Air Pollution (EURASAP); April; Bilthoven, The Netherlands. European Association
        for the Science of Air Pollution; pp. 202-210.

 Buresh, R. J.; Casselman, M. E.; Patrick, W. H., Jr. (1980) Nitrogen fixation in flooded soil systems, a review
       Adv. Agron. 33:  149-192.

 Buresh, R. J.; DeLaune, R. D.; Patrick, W. H., Jr. (1981) Influence of Spartina aherniflora on nitrogen loss
       from marsh soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45: 660-661.

Businger, J. A. (1986) Evaluation of the accuracy with which dry deposition can be measured with current
       micrometeorological techniques. J. dim. Appl.  Meteorol. 25:  1100-1124.

Button, D. K.  (1985) Kinetics of nutrient-limited transport and microbial growth. Microbiol. Rev. 49: 270-297.
 August 1991
10-244      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Bytnerowicz, A.; Miller, P. R.; Olszyk, D. M. (1987) Dry deposition of nitrate, ammonium and sulfate to a
       Ceanothus crassifolius canopy and surrogate surfaces. Atmos. Environ. 21:  1749-1757.

Bytnerowicz, A.; Miller, P. R.; Olszyk, D. M.; Dawson, P. L; Fox, C. A. (1987) Gaseous and particulate air
       pollution in the San Gabriel Mountains of southern California. Atmos. Environ. 21:  1805-1814.

Cadle, S. H.; Countess, R. J.;  Kelly, N. A. (1982) Nitric acid and ammonia in urban and rural locations.
       Atmos. Environ. 16: 2501-2506.

Cadle, S. H.; Dasch, J. M.;  Grossnickle, N. E.  (1984) Retention and release of chemical species by a northern
       Michigan snowpack. Water Air Soil Pollut. 22: 303-319.

Cadle, S. H.; Dasch, J. M.; Vande Kopple, R. (1987) Composition of snowmelt and runoff in northern
       Michigan. Environ. Sci. Technol. 21: 295-299.

Cargill, S.  M.; Jefferies, R.  L. (1984) Nutrient limitation of primary production in a sub-arctic salt marsh.
       J. Appl. Ecol. 21: 657-668.

Carpenter,  E. J.; Capone,  D. G.,  eds. (1983) Nitrogen in the marine environment.  New York, NY: Academic
       Press.

Caton, B. J. (1989) Nutrient reduction to the Bay: what's equitable, feasible, likely. In: Water-policy issues
       related to the Chesapeake Bay. Virginia Water Resources Research Center;  pp. 14-15.

Chatarpaul, L.; Robinson, J. B. (1979) Nitrogen transformations in stream sediments:  15N studies. In: Litchfield,
        C. D.; Seyfried, P. L., eds. Methodology for biomass determinations and microbial activities in
        sediments: a symposium sponsored by ASTM Committee D19 on Water; Ft. Lauderdale, FL; Jan. 1978.
        Philadelphia, PA:  American Society for Testing and Materials; pp. 119-125. (ASTM special technical
        publication 673).

 Chiandani, G.; Vighi,  M. (1974) The N:P ratio and tests with Selanastrum to predict eiitrophication in lakes.
        Water  Res. 8:  1063-1069.

 Chinchilli, J. E. (1989) Development and  a clean bay: is coexistence possible? In:  Water-policy issues related to
        the Chesapeake Bay. Virginia Water Resources Research Center; pp. 6-9.

 Cho,  C. M.; Sakdinan, L. (1978) Mass spectrometric investigation on denitrification.  Can. J. Soil Sci.
        58: 443-457.

 Clark, M. D.; Gilmour, J. T. (1983) The effect of temperature on decomposition at optimum and saturated soil
        water'contents. Soil Sci.  Soc. Am. J. 47: 927-929.

 Code of Federal Regulations.  (1987) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants. C. F. R. 50: 17.11 & 17.12.

 Cole, D. W.;  Gessel,  S. P. (1965) Movement of elements through a forest soil as  influenced by tree removal and
        fertilizer additions.  In: Youngberg, C. T., ed. Forest-soil relationships in North America: papers
        presented at the second North American forest soils conference; August 1963; Corvallis, OR: Oregon
        State University Press; pp. 95-104.

 Cole, D. W.;  Rapp, M. (1981) Elemental cycling in forest ecosystems. In: Reichle, D. E., ed.  Dynamic
        properties of forest ecosystems. Cambridge,  United Kingdom: Cambridge  University Press;  pp. 341-409.
        (International  biological programme 23).
   August 1991
10-245       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Cole, D. W.; Crane, W. J. B.; Grier, C. C. (1975) The effect of forest management practices on water chemistry
         in a second-growth Douglas fir ecosystem. In: Bernier, B.; Winget, C. H., eds. Forest soils and forest
         land management.  Quebec, Canada: Laval University Press; pp. 195-207.

 Cole, J. J.; Howarth, R. W.; Nolan,  S. S.; Marino, R. (1986) Sulfate inhibition of molybdate assimilation by
        planktonic algae and bacteria: some implications for the aquatic nitrogen cycle. Biogeochemistry
        2: 179-196.

 Cook, E. R.; Johnson, A.  H. (1989) Climate change and forest decline: a review of the red spruce case. Water
        Air Soil Pollut. 48: 127-140.

 Cooper, A. B. (1986) Supression of nitrate formation within an exotic conifer plantation. Plant Soil 93: 383-394.

 Correll, D. L. (1981) Nutrient mass balances for the watershed, headwaters intertidal zone, and basin of the   •
        Rhode River estuary. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26: 1142-1149.

 Correll, D. L.; Ford, D. (1982) Comparison of precipitation and  land runoff as sources of estuarine nitrogen. '
        Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 15: 45-56.

 Cosby, B. J.; Hornberger,  G. M.; Galloway,  J. N.; Wright, R. F. (1985) Modeling the effects of acid     •
        deposition: assessment of a lumped parameter model of soil water and streamwater chemistry. Water
        Resour. Res. 21: 51-63.

 Cosby, B. J.; Ryan, P. F.; Webb, R.; Hornberger, G. M.; Galloway, J. N. (1991) Mountains of West Virginia.
        In: Charles,  D. F., ed. Acidic deposition and aquatic ecosystems: regional case studies. New York, NY:
        Springer-Verlag.

 Cotrufo, C.; Berry, C. R. (1970) Some effects of a soluble NPK fertilizer on sensitivity of eastern white pine to
        injury from SO2 air pollution.  For. Sci. 16: 72-73.

 Cowling, D. W.; Lockyer,  D. R. (1981) Increased growth of ryegrass exposed to ammonia. Nature (London)
        292: 337-338.                                                                          •

 Crutzen, P. J. (1970) The influence of nitrogen oxides  on the atmospheric ozone content. Q. J. R Meteorol
        Soc. 96: 320-325.

 D'EHa, C. F. (1987) Too much of a good thing: nutrient enrichment of the Chesapeake Bay. Environment
        29(2): 6-11,  30-33.

 D'Elia, C. F.; Taft, J.; Smullen, J. T.; Macknis, J. (1982) Nutrient enrichment. In: Chesapeake Bay Program
        technical studies: a  synthesis. Annapolis, MD: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency; pp. 36-102.
        Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB84-111202.

 D'Elia, C. F.; Sanders, J. G.; Boynton, W. R. (1986) Nutrient enrichment studies in a coastal plain estuary:
       phytoplankton growth in large-scale, continuous cultures. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43: 397-406.

Dabney, S. M.; Bouldin, D. R.  (1985) Fluxes of ammonia over an alfalfa field. Agron. J. 77: 572-578.

Darnman, A. W. H. (1988) Regulation of nitrogen removal and retention in Sphagnum bogs and other peatlands.
       Oikos 51: 291-305.

Dasch, J. M. (1987) Measurement of dry deposition to  surfaces  in deciduous and pine canopies. Environ. Pollut
       44:261-277.
 August 1991
10-246       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Dasch, J. M. (1989) Dry deposition of sulfur dioxide or nitric acid to oak, elm and pine leaves. Environ. Pollut.
      ' 59: 1-16.

Davidson, E. A.; Swank, W. T. (1987) Factors limiting denitrification in soils from mature and disturbed
       southeastern hardwood forests. For. Sci. 33: 135-144.

Davidson, E. A.; Swank, W. T. (1990) Nitrous oxide dissolved in soil solution: an insignificant pathway of
       nitrogen loss from a southeastern hardwood forest. Water Resour. Res. 26: 1687-1690.

Davidson, C. I.; Wu, Y. -L. (1990) Dry deposition of particles and vapors. In: Lindberg, S. E.; Page, A. L.;
       Norton, S. A.,  eds. Acidic precipitation: v. 3, sources, deposition, and canopy interactions: -New York,
,...;    NY: Springer-Verlag; pp.  103-216.  -           .

Davidson, E. A.;  Stark, J. M.; Firestone, M. K. (1990) Microbial production and consumption of nitrate in an
       annual grassland. Ecology 71: 1968-1975.

Davis, C. B.; van der Valk, A. G.; Baker, J. L. (1983) The role of four macrophyte species in the removal of
       nitrogen and phosphorus from nutrient-rich water in a prairie marsh, Iowa. Madrono 30: 133-142.

Day, J. W., Jr.; Hopkinson, C. S.; Conner, W. H. (1982) An analysis of environmental factors regulating
       community metabolism and fisheries production in a Louisiana estuary. In: Kennedy, V. S., ed. Estuarine
       comparisons. New York, NY: Academic Press; pp. 121-136.

De,Temmerman, L.; Ronse, A.; van  den Cruys, K.;  Meeus-Verdinne, K. (1988) Ammonia and pine tree dieback
       in Belgium. In: Mathy, P., ed. Air pollution and ecosystems: proceedings of an international symposium;
       May 1987; Grenoble, France. Boston, MA: D. Reidel Publishing Company; pp. 774-779.

de Vries,- W. (1988) Critical deposition levels for nitrogen and sulphur on Dutch forest ecosystems. Water Air
        Soil Pollut. 42: 221-239.

Dean, J. V.; Biesboer, D. D. (1985)  Loss and uptake of 15N-ammonium in submerged soils of a cattail marsh.
        Am. J. Bot.  72: 1197-1203.

 Dean, J. V.; Harper, J. E. (1986) Nitric oxide and nitrous oxide production by soybean and winged bean during
        the in vivo nitrate reductase assay. Plant Physiol.  82: 718-723.

 Dean, J. V.; Harper, J. E. (1988) The conversion of nitrite to nitrogen oxide(s) by the constitutive
        NAD(P)H-nitrate reductase enzyme from soybean. Plant Physiol. 88: 389-395.

 DeBusk, W. F.; Reddy, K. R. (1987) Removal of flopdwater nitrogen in a cypress swamp receiving primary
        wastewater effluent. Hydrobiologia 153: 79-86.

 DeHayes,  D. H.; Ingle, M. A.; Waite, C. E. (1989) Nitrogen, fertilization enhances cold tolerance of red spruce
        seedlings. Can.,J. For. Res.  19: 1037-1043.

 Delany, A. C.; Davies, T. D. (1983) Dry deposition of NOX to grass in rural East Anglia. Atmos. Environ.
        17: 1391-1394.

 Delany, A. C.; Fitzjarrald, D. R.; Lenschow, D. H.; Pearson, R., Jr.; Wendel,  G. J.; Woodruff, B. (1986)
        Direct measurements of nitrogen oxides and ozone fluxes over grassland. J. Atmos.  Chem. 4: 429-444.

 DeLaune, R. D.; Reddy, C.  N.;  Patrick, W. H.,  Jr. (1981) .Organic matter decomposition in soil as influenced
        by pH and redox conditions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 13: 533-534.
  . August 1991
10_247      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 DeLaune, R. D.; Smith, C. J.; Patrick, W. H., Jr. (1983) Nitrogen losses from a Louisiana Gulf Coast salt
        marsh. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 17: 133-141.

 DeLaune, R. D.; Smith, C. J.; Sarafyan, M. N. (1986) Nitrogen cycling in a freshwater marsh of Panicum
        hemitomon on the deltaic plain of the Mississippi River. J. Ecol.  74: 249-256.

 Delwiche, C. C. (1970) The nitrogen cycle. Sci. Am. 223: 137-147.

 Delwiche, C. C. (1977) Energy relations in the global nitrogen cycle. Ambio 6: 106-111.

 Denmead, O. T.; Simpson, J. R.; Freney, J. R. (1974) Ammonia flux into the atmosphere from a grazed pasture.
        Science (Washington, DC) 185: 609-610.

 Denmead, O. T.; Freney, J. R.; Simpson, J. R. (1976) A closed ammonia cycle within a plant canopy. Soil Biol
        Biochem. 8: 161-164.

 Denmead, O. T.; Nulsen, R.; Thurtell, G. W.  (1978) Ammonia exchange over a corn crop. Soil Sci. Soc
        Am. J. 42: 840-842.

 DeWalle, D. R.; Sharpe, W. E.; Edwards, P. J. (1988) Biogeochemistry  of two Appalachian deciduous forest
        sites in relation to episodic stream acidification. Water Air Soil Pollut. 40: 143-156.

 Dicker, H. J.; Smith, D. W.  (1980) Physiological ecology of acetylene reduction (nitrogen fixation) in a
        Delaware salt marsh.  Microb. Ecol. 6:  161-171.

 Dierberg, F. E.; Brezonik, P. L. (1982) Nitrifying population densities and inhibition of ammonium oxidation in
        natural  and sewage-enriched cypress swamps. Water Res. 16: 123-126.

 Dillon, P. J.; Rigler, F. H. (1974) The phosphorus-chlorophyll relationship in lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr.
        19: 767-773.

 Dillon, P. J.; Lusis, M.; Reid, R.; Yap, D. (1988) Ten-year trends in sulphate, nitrate and hydrogen deposition
        in central Ontario. Atmos. Environ. 22: 901-905.

 Dodds, W. K.;  Priscu, J. C. (1990) A comparison of methods for assessment of nutrient deficiency of
        phytoplankton in a large oligotrophic lake. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47: 2328-2338.

 Doering, P. H.; Oviatt, C. A.; Beatty, L. L.; Banzon, V. F.; Rice, R.; Kelly, S. P.; Sullivan, B. K.; Frithsen,
        J. B. (1989) Structure and function in a model coastal ecosystem:  silicon,  the benthos and eutrophication.
        Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 52: 287-299.

 Dollard, G. J.;  Atkins, D. H. F.; Davies, T. J.; Healy,  C.  (1987) Concentrations and dry deposition velocities
        of nitric acid. Nature (London) 326: 481-483.

 Dolske, D. A. (1988) Dry deposition of airborne sulfate and nitrate to soybeans. Environ.  Pollut. 53: 1-12.

 Draaijers, G. P. J.;  Ivens, W. P. M. F.; Bos, M. M.; Bleuten, W. (1989) The contribution of ammonia
        emissions from agriculture to the deposition of acidifying and eutrophying compounds onto forests.
       Environ. Pollut. 60: 55-66.

Driscoll, C. T.; Newton, R. M. (1985)  Chemical characteristics of Adirondack lakes. Environ. Sci. Technol
        19: 1018-1024.
 August 1991
10-248      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Driscoll  C. T.; Schaefer, D. A. (1989) Background on nitrogen processes. In: Malanchuk, J, L.; Nilsson, J.,
       eds. The role of nitrogen in the acidification of soils and surface waters. Miljorapport, Sweden: Nordic
       Council of Ministers; pp. 4-1 - 4-12.

Driscoll, C. T.; Schafran, G. C. (1984) Short-term changes in the base neutralizing capacity of an acid
       Adirondack lake, New York. Nature (London) 310: 308-310.

Driscoll, C. T. et al. (n.d.) Processes regulating seasonal variations in the water chemistry of Adirondack lakes.
       Water Air  Soil Pollut.: in review.
Driscoll C. T.; Wyskowski, B. J.; Cosentini, C. G.; Smith, M. E. (1987a) Processes regulating temporal
        longitudinal variations in the chemistry of a low-order woodland stream in the Adirondack region of New
        York. Biogeochemistry 3: 225-241.

Driscoll, C. T.; Yatsko, C. P.; Unangst, F. J. (1987b) Longitudinal and temporal trends in the water chemistry
        of the north branch of the Moose River. Biogeochemistry 3: 37-61.

Driscoll C. T.; Schaefer, D. A.; Molot, L. A.; Dillon, P. J. (1989a) Summary of North American data. In:
        Malanchuk, J. L.; Nilsson, J., eds. The role of nitrogen in the acidification of soils and surface waters.
        Gotab, Sweden: Nordic Council of Ministers; pp.  6-1 - 6-45.

 Driscoll C T ; Wyskowski, B. J.; DeStaffan, P. (1989b) Chemistry and transfer of aluminum in a forested
        watershed in the Adirondack region of New York, USA. In: Lewis, T.,  ed. The environmental chemistry
        of aluminum. Chelsea, MA: Lewis Publishers; pp. 1-26.

 Driscoll, C. T.; Newton,  R. M.; Gubala,  C. P.; Baker, J. P.; Christensen, S. W. (1991) Adirondack mountains.
        In: Charles, D. F., ed. Acidic deposition and aquatic ecosystems: regional case  studies.  New York, NY:
        Springer-Verlag; pp. 133-202.

 Duff, J. H.; Triska, F. J. (1990) Denitrification in sediments from the hyporheic zone adjacent  to a small
        forested stream. Can. J.  Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47: 1140-1147.

 Duyzer, J. H.; Meyer, G. M.; van Aalst,  R.  M. (1983) Measurement of dry deposition velocities of NO, NO2
        'and O3 and the influence of chemical  reactions. Atmos. Environ. 17: 2117-2120.

 Duyzer, J. H.; Bouman, A. M.  M.; van Aalst, R.  M.; Diederen, H.  S. M. A.  (1987) Assessment of dry
         deposition fluxes of NH3 and NH4+ over natural terrains. In: Asman, W. A. H.; Diederen, H. S. M. A.,
         eds Ammonia and acidification: proceedings of a symposium of the European Association for the Science
         of Air Pollution (EURASAP); April; Bilthoven, The Netherlands. European Association for the Science
         of Air Pollution; pp. 97-106.                                                   '

  Edwards, P.  J.; Helvey, J. D. (1991) Long-term ionic increases from a central  Appalachian forested watershed.
         J. Environ. Qual. 20: 250-255.

  Effler, S. W.; Brooks, C. M.; Auer, M.  T.; Doerr, S. M.  (1990) Free ammonia and toxicity criteria in a
         polluted urban lake. Res. J. Water Pollut.  Control Fed. 62: 771-779.

  Eilers, J. M.; Kanciruk, P.; McCord, R.  A.; Overton, W.  S.; Hook, L.; Blick, D. J.;  Brakke, D.  F.; Kellar,
         P  E.; DeHaan, M. S.; Silverstein, M. E.; Landers, D. H. (1987) Western lake survey phase I:
         characteristics of lakes in the western United States, volume II: data compendium for selected physical
         and chemical variables. Washington, DC:  U. S. Environmental Protection  Agency, Office of Acid
         Deposition,  Environmental Monitoring and Quality Assurance;  EPA report no. EPA/600/3-86/054B.
         Available from: NTIS,  Springfield, VA; PB88-146832/REB.
    August 1991
10-249      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Eilers, J. M.; Sullivan, T. J.; Hurley, K. C. (1990) The most dilute lake in the world? Hydrobiologia 199:  1-6.

 Elkiey, T.; Ormrod, D. P. (1981) Absorption of ozone, sulphur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide by petunia plants.
        Environ. Exp. Bot. 21: 63-70.

 Elkiey, T.; Ormrod, D. P.; Marie, B. (1982) Foliar sorption of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone by
        ornamental woody plants. Hortscience 17: 358-360.

 Elkins, J. W.; Wofsy, S.  C.; McElroy, M. B.; Kolb, C. E.; Kaplan, W. A. (1978) Aquatic sources and sinks
        for nitrous oxide. Nature (London) 275: 602-606.

 Ellenberg, H. (1987) Floristic changes due to eutrophication. In: Asman, W. A. H.; Diederen, S. M. A., eds.
        Ammonia and acidification: proceedings of a symposium of the European Association for the Science of
        Air Pollution (EURASAP); April; Bilthoven, The Netherlands. European Association for the Science of
        Air Pollution; pp. 301-308.

 Ellenberg, H. (1988) Floristic changes due to nitrogen deposition in central Europe, m: Nilsson, J.;
        Grennfelt, P., eds. Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen: report from a workshop; March; Skokloster,
        Sweden. Copenhagen,  Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers; pp. 375-383.

 Elser, J. J.; Marzolf, E. R.; Goldman, C. R. (1990) Phosphorus and nitrogen limitation of phytoplankton growth
        in the freshwaters of North America: a review and critique of experimental enrichments. Can. J. Fish
        Aquat. Sci. 47: 1468-1477.

 Elwood, J. W.; Turner, R. R.  (1989)  Streams: water chemistry and ecology. In: Johnson, D. W.; Van Hook,
        R. I., eds. Analysis of biogeochemical cycling processes  in Walker Branch Watershed. New York, NY:
        Springer-Verlag; pp. 301-350.

 Elwood, J. W.; Newbold, J. D.; O'Neill, R. V. (1980)  Phosphorus spiralling in a woodland stream ecosystem:
        seasonal changes and the role of the microbial community. Int. Assoc. Theor. Appl. Limnol. (Tokyo).

 Elwood, J. W.; Sale, M. J.; Kaufmann, P. R.; Cada, G. F. (1991) The Southern Blue Ridge province. In:
        Charles, D. F., ed. Acidic deposition and aquatic ecosystems: regional case studies. New York, NY:
        Springer-Verlag.

 Emerson, K.; Russo, R. C.; Lund, R. W.; Thurston, R. V. (1975)  Aqueous ammonia equilibrium calculations:
        effect of pH and temperature. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 32:  2379-2383.

 Enders, G.; Teichmann, U. (1986) GASDEP - gaseous deposition measurements of SO2, NOX, and O3 to a spruce
        stand: conception,  instrumentation, and first results of an experimental project. In: Georgii, H.-W., ed.
        Atmospheric pollutants in forest areas: their deposition and interception. Boston, MA: D. Reidel
        Publishing Company; pp. 13-24.

 Enoksson, V.; Sorensson, F.; Graneli, W. (1990) Nitrogen transformations in the Kattegat. Ambio 19: 159-166.

 Eppley, R. W.; Renger, E. H.; Harrison, W. G.; Cullen, J. J. (1979) Ammonium distribution in southern
        California coastal waters and its role in the growth of phytoplankton. Lirnnol. Oceanogr, 24:  495-509.

Erisman, J.-W.; Vermetten, A. W. M.; Asman, W. A. H.; Waijers-Upelaan, A.; Slanina, J.  (1988) Vertical
        distribution of gases and aerosols: the behaviour of ammonia and  related components in the lower
        atmosphere. Atmos. Environ. 22: 1153-1160.

Eshleman, K. N. (1988) Predicting regional episodic acidification of surface waters using empirical models.
       Water Resour. Res. 24: 1118-1126.
 August 1991
10-250      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Eshleman, K. N.; Hemond, H. F. (1985) The role of organic acids in the acid-base status of surface waters at
       Bickford Watershed, Massachusetts. Water Resour. Res. 21: 1503-1510.

Evans, L. S. (1986) Proposed mechanisms of initial injury-causing apical dieback in red spruce at high elevation
       in eastern North America. Can. J. For. Res.  16: 1113-1116.

Fahey, D. W.; Hubler, G.; Parrish, D. D.; Williams, E. J.; Norton, R. B.; Ridley, B. A.; Singh, H. B.; Liu,
       S. C.; Fehsenfeld, F.  C.  (1986) Reactive nitrogen species in the troposphere: measurements of NO, NO2,
       HNO3, particulate nitrate, peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN), O3, and total reactive odd nitrogen (NOy) at Niwot
       Ridge, Colorado. J. Geophys.  Res. [Atmos.] 91: 9781-9793.

Farquhar, G. D.; Wetselaar, R.;  Firth, P. M. (1979) Ammonia volatilization from senescing leaves of maize.
       Science (Washington,  DC) 203: 1257-1258.

Farquhar, G. P.; Firth, P. M.; Wetselaar, R.; Weir, B. (1980) On the gaseous exchange of ammonia between
       leaves and the environment: determination of the ammonia compensation point. Plant Physiol.
       66:710-714.                                                     ,

Farquhar, G. D.; Wetselaar, R.;  Weir, B. (1983) Gaseous nitrogen losses from plants. In: Freney, J. R.;
       Simpson, J. R., eds. Gaseous loss of nitrogen from plant-soil systems. The Hague, The Netherlands:
       Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W.  Junk Publishers; pp. 159-180.

Federal Register. (1985) Endangered and threatened  wildlife and plants; review of plant taxa for listing as
       endangered or threatened species.  F.  R.  (September 27) 50: 39526-39584.

Federer, C. A.; Hombeck, J. W.; Tritton, L. M.; Martin, C, W.; Pierce, R.  S. (1989) Long-term depletion of
       calcium and other nutrients in eastern US forests Environ. Manage. 13: 593-601.

Feller, M. C. (1987) The influence of acid precipitation on stream chemistry in a small forested basin in
        southwestern British Columbia. In: Swanson, R. H.; Bernier, P. Y.; Woodward, P. D., eds. Forest
       hydrology and watershed management: proceedings of the Vancouver symposium; August. IAHS-AISH
       publication no.  167.                                                               ,

 Ferguson, P.; Lee, J. A. (1980)  Some effects of bisulphite and sulphate on the growth of Sphagnum species in
        the field. Environ.  Pollut. Ser. A 21: 59-71.

 Ferguson, P.; Robinson, R. N.;  Press, M. C.; Lee, J. A. (1984) Element concentrations in five Sphagnum
        species in relation to  atmospheric pollution.  J. Bryol. 13: 107-114.

 Fisher, D.; Ceraso, J.; Mathew, T.;  Oppenheimer, M. (1988a) Polluted coastal waters: the role of acid rain.
        New York, NY: Environmental Defense Fund.                                  ,

 Fisher, T. R.;  Harding, L. W.,  Jr.; Stanley, D. W.; Ward, L. G. (1988b) Phytoplankton, nutrients, and
        turbidity in the Chesapeake, Delaware, and Hudson estuaries.  Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 27: 61-93.

 Fisher, F. M.; Zak, J. C.; Cunningham, G. L.; Whitford, W.  G. (1988c) Water and nitrogen effects on growth
        and allocation patterns of creosotebush in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. J. Range Manage.
        41: 387-391.

 Fitzjarrald, D. R.; Lenschow, D. H.  (1983) Mean concentration and flux profiles for chemically reactive species
        in the atmospheric surface layer.  Atmos. Environ. 17: 2505-2512.

 Fleischer, S.; Stibe, L. (1989) Agriculture kills marine fish in the 1980s. Who is responsible for fish kills in the
        year 2000? Ambio 18: 347-350.
   August 1991
10-251       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  Flett, R. J.; Schindler, D. W.; Hamilton, R. D.; Campbell, N. E. R. (1980) Nitrogen fixation in Canadian
         Precambrian Shield lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 494-505.

  Flora, M. D.; Rosendahl, P. C.  (1982) The impact of atmospheric deposition on the water quality of Everglades
         National Park. In: International symposium on hydrometeorology; June. American Water Resources
         Association; pp. 55-61.

 Focht, D. D. (1974) The effect of temperature, pH, and aeration on the production of nitrous oxide and gaseous
         nitrogen - zero-order kinetic model. Soil Sci.  118: 173-179.

 Foerstel, H.; Latus, C.; Neubert, A.  (1989) Einbau von Stickstoff aus gasformigem 15NO2 in die oberirdische
         Biomasse von Pflanzen. In: Volume of poster abstracts: international congress on forest decline research -
         state of knowledge and perspectives. Friedrichschafen, Federal Republic of Germany; pp. 353-354.

 Foster, N. W. (1985) Acid precipitation and soil solution chemistry within a maple-birch forest in Canada. For.
        Ecol. Manage. 12: 215-231.

 Foster, N. W.; Nicolson, J. A. (1988) Acid deposition and nutrient leaching from deciduous vegetation and
        podzolic soils at the Turkey Lakes Watershed. Can. J.  Fish. Aquat.  Sci. 45(suppl. 1): 96-100.

 Foster, N. W.; Beauchamp, E. G.; Corke,  C. T. (1985a) Reactions of 15N-labelled urea with jack pine
        forest-floor materials. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17: 699-703.

 Foster, N. W.; Beauchamp, E. G.; Corke,  C. T. (1985b) Immobilization of nitrogen-15-labelled urea in a jack
        pine forest floor. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49: 448-452.

 Foster, N. W.; Nicolson, J. A.; Hazlett, P. W. (1989) Temporal variation in nitrate and nutrient cations in
        drainage waters from a deciduous forest. J. Environ. Qual. 18: 238-244.

 Fowler, D. (1984) Transfer to terrestrial surfaces. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 305: 281-297.

 Fowler, D.; Cape, J. N.; Unsworth, M, H.  (1989a) Deposition of atmospheric pollutants on forests. Philos.
        Trans. R. Soc. London B 324: 247-265.

 Fowler, D.; Cape, J. N.; Deans, J. D.; Leath, I. D.; Murray, M. B.; Smith, R. I.; Sheppard, L. J.; Unsworth,
        M. H. (1989b) Effects of acid mist  on the frost hardiness of red spruce seedlings. New Phytol
        106: 225-227.

 Fox, D. G.; Barthuska, A. M.; Byrne, J. G.; Cowling, E.; Fisher, R.; Likens, G. E.; Lindberg, S. E.;
        Linthurst, R.  A.; Messer, J.; Nichols, D. S. (1989) A screening procedure to evaluate air pollution
        effects on Class I wilderness areas. Ft. Collins, CO: U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service,
        Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station; general technical report RM-168.

 Franklin, J. F.; Dyrness, C. T.; Moore, D. G.; Tarrant, R. F. (1968) Chemical  soil properties under coastal
        Oregon stands of alder and conifers. In:  Trappe, J. M.; Franklin, J.  F.; Tarrant, R. F.; Hansen,  G. M.,
        eds. Biology of alder: proceedings of a symposium; April 1967; Pullman, WA. Portland, OR: U. S.
        Forest Service, Pacific Northwest and Range Experiment Station; pp. 157-172.

Prayer, W. E.; Monahan, T. J.; Dowden, D. C.; Graybill, F. A. (1983) Status and trends  of wetlands and
        deepwater habitats in the conterminous United States, 1950s to 1970s. Ft. Collins,  CO:  Colorado State
        University, Department of Forest and Wood Sciences.

Freer-Smith, P. H. (1983) Chronic pollution injury to some tree species in response to SO2 and NO2 mixtures
        [Thesis]. Lancaster, United Kingdom: University of Lancaster.
 August 1991
10-252       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Freer-Smith, P. H. (1988) Direct effects 'of dry and wet deposition on forest ecosystems - in particular canopy
        interactions. In: Mathy, P., eds. Air pollution and ecosystems. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel
        Publishing Company; pp. 217-274.

 Friedland, A. J.; Gregory, R. A.; Karenlampi, L.; Johnson, A. H. (1984) Winter damage to foliage as a factor
        in red spruce decline. Can. J. For. Res. 14: 963-965.

 Fuhrer, J.; Erismann, K. H. (1980) Uptake of NO2 by plants grown at different salinity levels. Experientia
        36: 409-410.                                       .

 Gallagher, J. L. (1975) Effect of an ammonium nitrate pulse on the growth and elemental composition of natural
        stands of Spartina alterniflofa and Juncus roemerianus. Am. J. Bot. 62: 644-648.

 Gallagher, J. L.; Donovan, L. A.; Grant, D. M.; Decker, D.  M.  (1987) Interspecific differences in dead plant
        buffering capacity alter the impact of acid rain on decomposition rates in tidal marshes. Water Air Soil
        Pollut. 34: 339-346.

 Galloway, J. N.; Schofield, C. L.; Hendrey, G. R.; Peters, N. E.; Johannes, A. H. (1980) Sources of acidity in
        three lakes acidified during snowmelt. In: Drablos, D.; Tollan, A., eds. Ecological effects of acid
        precipitation: proceedings of an international conference. Mysen, Norway: Johs. Grefslie Trykkeri A/S;
        pp. 264-265.

 Galloway, J. N.; Likens, G. E.; Keene, W.  C.; Miller, J. M. (1982) The composition of precipitation in remote
        areas of the world. J. Geophys. Res.  C: Oceans Atmos. 87:  8771-8786.

 Galloway, J. N.; Norton, S. A.;  Church, M. R.  (1983) Freshwater acidification from atmospheric deposition of
        sulfuric acid: a conceptual model. Environ. Sci. Technol.  17: 541A-545A.

 Garner, J. H. B.;  Pagano, T'.; Cowling, E. B. (1989) An evaluation of the role of ozone, acid deposition, and
        other airborne pollutants hi the forests of eastern North America. Asheville, NC: U. S. Department of
        Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station; general technical report SE-59.

 Garten, C. T., Jr.; Hanson, P. J. (1990) Foliar retention of 15N-nitrate and 15N-ammonium by red maple (Acer
        rubruni) and white oak (Quercus alba) leaves from simulated rain. Environ. Exp. Bot. 30: 333-342.

 Ga'vis, J. (1976) Munk and Riley revisited: nutrient diffusion transport and rates of phytoplankton growth.
        J. Mar. Res.  34: 161-179.                                               ,

 Gerhart, D. Z.; Likens, G. E. (1975) Enrichment experiments for determining nutrient limitation: four methods
        compared. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20: 649-653.

• Gessel, S. P.; Cole, D. W.; Steinbrenner, E. C.  (1973) Nitrogen balances in forest ecosystems of the Pacific
        Northwest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 5: 19-34.

 Gherini, S. A.; Mok, L.; Hudson, R. J. M.; Davis, G. F.; Chen, C. W.; Goldstein, R. A.  (1985) The ILWAS
        model: formulation and application.  Water Air Soil Pollut. 26: 425-459.

 Ghiorse,  W. C.; Alexander, M.  (1976) Effect of microorganisms on the sorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen
        dioxide in soil. J. Environ. Qual. 5: 227-230.

 Gilbert, D. A.; Sagraves, T. H.; Lang, M. M.; Mimson, R. K.; Gherini, S.  A. (1989) R&D Lake Acidification
        Assessment Project: Blue Lake acidification study. San Ramon, CA: Pacific Gas and Electric; report
        009.5-89.2.
  August 1991
10-253
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Gmur, N. F.; Evans, L. S.; Cunningham, E. A. (1983) Effects of ammonium sulfate aerosols on vegetation—
        II. mode of entry and responses of vegetation. Atmos. Environ. 17: 715-721.

 Godshalk, G. L.; Wetzel, R. G. (1978) Decomposition of aquatic angiosperms. .II. Particulate components.
        Aquat. Bot. 5:  301-327.

 Goldman, J. C. (1976) Identification of nitrogen as a growth-limiting nutrient in wastewaters and coastal marine
        waters through continuous culture algal assays. Water Res. 10: 97-104.

 Goldman, C. R. (1988) Primary productivity, nutrients, and transparency during the early onset of eutrophication
        in ultra-oligotrophic Lake Tahoe, California-Nevada. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33: 1321-1333.

 Goldman, J. C.; Gilbert, P. M. (1982) Comparative rapid ammonium uptake by four species of marine
        phytoplankton.  Limnol. Oceanogr. 27: 814-827.

 Goodroad, L. L.; Keeney, D. R. (1984) Nitrous oxide emission from forest, marsh, and prairie ecosystems.
        J. Environ. Qual. 13: 448-452.

 Gordon, A. S.; Cooper, W. J.; Scheidt, D. J. (1986) Denitrification in marl and peat sediments in the Florida
        Everglades. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52: 987-991.

 Granat, L.; Johansson,  C. (1983) Dry  deposition of SO2 and NOX in winter. Atmos. Environ.  17: 191-192.

 Graneli, E. (1978) Algal assay of limiting nutrients for phytoplankton production in the Oresund. Vatten
        2: 117-128.

 Graneli, E.; Wallstrom, K.; Larsson, U.; Graneli,  W.; Elmgren, R. (1990) Nutrient limitation of primary
        production in the Baltic Sea area. Ambio 19:  142-151.

 Gravenhorst, G.; Hoefken,  K. D.; Georgii, H. W. (1983) Acidic input to a beech and spruce forest.  In:
        Beilke, S.; Elshout, A. J., eds, Acid deposition: proceedings of the CEC workshop organized as part of
        the concerted action "Physico-chemical behaviour of atmospheric  pollutants"; September 1982; Berlin,
        Federal Republic of Germany.  Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company;
       pp. 155-171.

Grennfelt, P.; Hultberg, H. (1986) Effects of nitrogen deposition on the acidification of terrestrial and aquatic
       ecosystems. Water Air Soil Pollut. 30: 945-963.

Grennfelt, P.; Bengtson, C.; Skarby, L. (1983) Dry deposition of nitrogen  dioxide to Scots pine needles. In:
       Pruppacher, H. R.;  Semonin, R. G.; Slinn, W. G. N.j  eds. Precipitation scavenging, dry deposition, and
        resuspension. Volume 2. Dry deposition and resuspension: proceedings of the fourth international
        conference; November-December 1982;  Santa Monica, CA. New  York, NY: Elsevier; pp. 753-762.

Grier, C. C. (1975) Wildfire effects on nutrient distribution and leaching  in a coniferous ecosystem. Can. J.  For.
       Res. 5: 599-607.

Grime, J. P. (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Groffman, P. M.; House, G. J.; Hendrix, P.  F.; Scott, D. E.;  Crossley,  D. A., Jr. (1986) Nitrogen cycling as
       affected by interactions of components in a Georgia piedmont agroecosystem. Ecology 67: 80-87.
 August 1991
10-254      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Guderian, R.; Kueppera, K. (1980) Response of plant communities to air pollution. In: Miller, P. R., ed.
       Proceedings of the symposium on effects of 'air pollutants on Mediterranean and temperate forest
       ecosystems; June; Riverside, CA. Berkeley, CA: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest
       Forest and Range Experiment Station; pp. 187-199; Forest Service general technical report no. PSW-43.
       Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB81-133720.

Guderian, R.; Tingey, D. T.; Rabe, R.  (1985) Effects of photochemical oxidants on plants. In: Guderian,  R., ed.
       Air pollution by photochemical oxidants. Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany:. Springer-Verlag;
       pp. 127-333.

Hahn, J.; Crutzen, P. J. (1982) The role of fixed nitrogen in atmospheric photochemistry. Philos. Trans. R. Soc.
       London B 296: 521-541.

Haines, E. B. (1979) Growth dynamics  of cordgrass, Spartina alterniflora Loisel., on control and sewage  sludge
       fertilized plots in a Georgia salt marsh. Estuaries 2: 50-53.

Haines, T. A. (1987) Atlantic salmon resources in the northeastern United States and the potential  effects of
       acidification from atmospheric deposition. Water Air Soil Pollut. 35: 37-48.

Haines, S. G.; Cleveland, G. (1981) Seasonal variation in properties of five forest soils hi southwest Georgia.
       Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45:  139-143.
                    '-                   '     -    •    M                     t
Hanson,  P. J.; Taylor, G. E., Jr.  (1990) Modeling pollutant gas uptake by leaves: an approach based on
       physicochemical properties. In:  Dixon, R.  K.; Meldahl, R.;  Ruark,  G.; lessen, N., eds. Forest growth:
       process modeling of responses to environmental stress. Portland, OR: Timber Press; pp. 351-356.

Hanson, P. J.; Rott, K.; Taylor, G. E., Jr.; Gunderson, C. A.;. Lindberg, S. E.;  Ross-Todd, B. M. (1989) NO2
        deposition to elements representative  of a forest landscape. Atmos. Environ. 23: 1783-1794.

Hanson, P. J.; Taylor, G. E., Jr.; Vose, J. (1991) Measurements of reactive nitrogen gas deposition to  forest
        landscape surfaces: biological and environmental controls. In: Johnson, D. W.; Lindberg,  S. E., eds.
        Atmospheric deposition and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; in
        press.        •       .   •  ..   .

Hantschel, R.; Kaupenjohann, M.; Horn, R.; Zech, W. (1990) Water, nutrient and pollutant budgets in damaged
        Norway spruce stands in NE-Bavaria (F.R.G.) and their changes after different fertilization treatments.
        Water Air Soil Pollut. 49: 273-297.                  ,   •  .           '

Hao, W. M.; Wofsy, .S. C.;  McElroy,  M. B.;  Beer, J.  M.; Toqan,,M. A. (1987) Sources of atmospheric nitrous
       . oxide from combustion. J. Geophys.  Res.  [Atmos.] 92: 3098-3104.

Harper,  L. A.; Catchpoole,  V. R.; Davis, R.; Weir, K. L. (1983) Ammonia volatilization: soil, plant, and
        microclimate effects on diurnal and seasonal fluctuations. Agron. J. 75: 212-218.

 Harper,  L. A.; Sharpe, R. R.; Langdale, G.  W.; Giddens, J. E. (1987) Nitrogen cycling in a wheat crop: soil,
        plant, and aerial nitrogen transport. Agron. J. 79: 965-973.

 Harrison, R. M.; Rapsomanikis,  S.; Turnbull, A. (1989) Land-surface exchange  in a chemically-reactive system;
      .  surface fluxes of HNO3, HC1, and NH3. Atmos. Environ. 23: 1795-1800.

 Harriss, R. C.;  Sebacher, D. L; Day, F. P., Jr. (1982) Methane flux in the Great Dismal Swamp. Nature
         (London) 297: 673-674.
  August 1991
10-255      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Harriss, R. C.; Gotham, E.; Sebacher, D. I.; Bartlett, K. B.; Flebbe, P. A. (1985) Methane flux from northern
       peatlands. Nature (London) 315: 652-653.

Hauhs, M. (1989) Lange Bramke: an;ecosystem study of a forested watershed. In: Adriano, D. C.; Salmons, W.,
       eds. Acidic precipitation. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; pp. 275-305.

Hauhs, M.; Rost-Siebert, K.; Raben, G.; Paces, T.; Vigerust, B. (1989) Summary of European data. In:
       Malanchuk, J. L.; Nilsson, L, eds. The role of nitrogen in the acidification of soils and surface waters.
       Nordic Council of Ministers, Miljorapport 1989:10; pp. 5-1 - 5-37.

Healey, F. P.  (1973) Inorganic nutrient uptake and deficiency in algae. Crit. Rev. Microbiol.: 69-113.

Hecky, R. E.; Kilham, P. (1988) Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in freshwater and marine environments:
       a review of recent evidence on trie effects of enrichment. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33: 796-822.

Hedin, L. O.; Likens, G. E.; Bormann, F. H. (1987) Decrease in precipitation acidity resulting from decreased
       SO,,2" concentration. Nature (London) 325: 244-246.

Heil, G. W.; Bruggink, M. (1987) Competition for nutrients between Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull  and Molinia
       caerulea (L.) Moench.  Oecologia 73: 105-108.

Heil, G. W.; van Dam, D.; Heijne, B. (1987) Catch of atmospheric deposition in relation to vegetation structures
       of heathland. In: Asman, W. A. H.; Diederen, H. S. M. A.,  eds.  Ammonia and acidification:
       proceedings of a symposium bf the European Association for the Science of Air Pollution (EURASAP);
       April; Bilthoven, The Netherlands. European Association for the Science of Air Pollution; pp. 107-123.

Heil, G. W.; Werger, M. J. A.; de Mol, W.; van Dam, D.; Heijne, B. (1988) Capture of atmospheric
       ammonium by grassland canopies. Science (Washington, DC)  239: 764-765.

Heilman, P. E,;  Gessel, S. P. (1963) Nitrogen requirements and the biological cycling  of nitrogen in Douglas-fir
       stands in relationship to the effects of nitrogen fertilization. Plant Soil 18: 386-402.

Helvey, J. D.; Kunkle, S. H. (1986):Input-output budgets of selected nutrients on an experimental watershed near
        Parsons, West Virginia. Broomall,  PA: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Northeastern Forest Experiment
        Station; USDA-Forest Service research paper NE-584.

Hemond, H. F. (1983) The nitrogen budget of Thoreau's Bog. Ecology 64: 99-109.

Henderson, G. S.; Harris, W. F. (1975) An ecosystem approach to characterization of the nitrogen cycle in a
        deciduous forest watershed. In: Bernier, B.; Winget, C. H., eds. Forest soils and forest land
        management: proceedings of the fourth North American forest soils conference; August 1973; Quebec,
        PQ, Canada. Quebec, PQ, Canada: Les Presses de L'Universite Laval; pp. 179-183.

Hendrickson,  O. Q. (1985) Variation in the C:N ratio of substrate mineralized during forest humus
        decomposition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17: 435-440.

Henriksen, A. (1988) Critical loads of nitrogen to surface waters.  In:  Nilsson, J.; Grennfelt, P., eds. Critical
        loads  for sulphur and nitrogen: report from a workshop; March; Skokloster, Sweden.  Copenhagen,
        Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers; pp. 385-412.

Henriksen, A.; Brakke, D.  F. (1988) Increasing contributions of nitrogen  to the  acidity of surface waters in
        Norway. Water Air Soil Pollut. 42: 183-201.
  August  1991
10-256      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   Henriksen, A.; Lien, L.; Traaen, T. S.; Sevaldrad, I.'S.; Brakke, D. F. (1988) Lake acidification in Norway -
          present and predicted .chemical status. Ambio 17: 259-266.

   Hicks, B. B. (1989) Overview of deposition processes. In: Malanchuk, J. L.; Nilsson, J., eds. The role of
          nitrogen in the acidification of soils and surface waters. Nordic Council of Ministers, Miljorapport
          1989:10; pp. 3-1 - 3-21.

   Hicks, B. B.; Matt, D.  R.  (1988) Combining biology, chemistry, and meteorology in modeling and measuring
          dry deposition.  J. Atmos. Chem. 6:  117-131.

   Hicks, B. B.; Meyers, T. P. (1988) Measuring and modelling dry deposition in mountainous areas. In:
          Unsworth, M. H.;  Fowler, D., eds. Acid deposition at high elevation sites. Boston, MA: Kluwer
          Academic Publishers; pp. 541-552.

   Hicks, B. B.; Matt, D.  R.; McMillen, R. T.; Womack, J. D.; Shelter, R. E. (1984) Eddy fluxes of nitrogen
          oxides to a deciduous forest in complex terrain. In: Samson, P. J., ed. Transactions: the meteorology of
          acid deposition, an APCA specialty conference; October 1983;  Hartford, CT. Pittsburgh, PA: Air
          Pollution Control Association; pp. 189-201.

   Hicks, B. B.; Baldocchi, D. D.; Hosker, R. P., Jr.; Hutchison, B.  A.; Matt, D. R.; McMillen, R. T.;  .
          Satterfield, L. C. (1985) On the use of monitored air concentrations  to infer dry deposition (1985). Silver
          Spring, MD: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Air Resources Laboratory; NOAA
          technical memorandum no. ERL-ARL-141. Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB86-158409.

A  Hi6ks,,B. B.; Baldocchi, D. D.; Meyers, T. P.; Hosker, R..P., Jr.; Matt, D. R. (1987) A preliminary multiple
          resistance routine for deriving dry deposition velocities from measured quantities. Water Air Soil Pollut.
          36: 311-330.

   Hicks, B. B.; Matt, D.  R.; McMillen, R. T. (1989) A micrometeorological  investigation of surface exchange of
          O3, SO2 and NO2: a case study. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 47: 321-336.

   Hill, A. C. (1971) Vegetation:  a sink for atmospheric pollutants. J. Air Pollut.  Control Assoc. 21: 341-346.

   Kingston, F. J.; Atkinson, R. J.; Posner, A- M.; Quirk, J. P. (1967) Specific adsorption of anions. Nature
          (London) 215: 1459-1461.

   Hoefken, ,K. D.; Gravenhorst, G. (1982) Deposition of atmospheric aerosol  particles to beech- and spruce forest.
          In: Georgii, H.-W.; Pankrath, J., eds. Deposition of atmospheric pollutants: proceedings of a
          colloquium; November 1981; Oberursel/Taunus, Federal Republic of Germany. Dordrecht, The
          Netherlands: D. ReideJ Publishing Company; pp. 191-194.

   Hofstetter, R. H. (1983) Wetlands in the United States. In: Gore, Ai J. P., ed. Mires: swamp, bog, fen and
          moor - regional studies. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company;
          pp. 201-244. (Ecosystems of the world 4B).

   Hollis, C: A.; Smith, W. H.; Schmidt, R. A.; Pritchett, W. L. (1975) Soil  and tissue nutrients, soil drainage,
          fertilization and tree growth as related to fusiform rust incidence in slash pine. For. Sci. 21:  141-148.
                                                          •             .              .
   Holmes, A. N.; Williams, W. D.; Wood, G. (1980) Relationships between  forms of nitrogen and hydrological
          characteristics in a small stream near Adelaide, South Australia. Aust. J; Mar. Freshwater Res.
          31: 297-317.

   Hosker, R. P., Jr.; Lindberg, S. E.  (1982) Review: atmospheric deposition  and plant assimilation of gases and
          particles. Atmos. Environ. 16: 889-910.
    August 1991
10-257      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Howarth, R. W. (1988) Nutrient limitation of net primary production in marine ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol.
        19: 89-110.                                                                      ,

Howarth, R. W.; Cole, J. J. (1985) Molybdenum availability, nitrogen limitation, and phytoplankton growth in
        natural waters. Science (Washington, DC) 229: 653-655.

Howarth, R. W.; Marino, R.; Lane, J.; Cole, J. J. (1988a) Nitrogen fixation in freshwater, estuarine, and
        marine ecosystems.  1. Rates and importance. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33: 669-687.

Howarth, R. W.; Marino, R.; Cole, J. J.  (1988b) Nitrogen fixation in freshwater, estuarine, and marine
        ecosystems. 2. Biogeochemical controls. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33: 688-701.

Howes, B. L.; Dacey, J.  W. H.; Goehringer, D. D.  (1986) Factors controlling the growth form of Spartina
        alterniflora: feedbacks between above-ground production, sediment oxidation, nitrogen and salinity.
        J. Bool. 74: 881-898.

Hoyer, M. V.; Jones, J. R. (1983) Factors affecting  the relation between phosphorus and chlorophyll a in
        midwestem reservoirs. Can. J. Fish.  Aquat. Sci. 40: 192-199.

Huebert, B. J. (1983) Measurements of the dry-deposition flux of nitric acid vapor to grasslands and forest. In:
        Pruppacher, H. R.;  Semonin, R.iG.; Slinn, W. G. N., eds. Precipitation scavenging, dry deposition, and
        resuspension: volume 2, dry deposition and resuspension; proceedings of the fourth international,
        conference; November-December 1982; Santa Monica, CA. New York, NY: Elsevier; pp. 785-794.

Huebert, B. J.; Robert, C. H. (1985) The dry deposition of nitric acid to grass. J. Geophys. Res. [Atmos.]
        90: 2085-2090.

Huebert, B. J.; Luke, W. T.; Delany, A,  C.; Brost,  R. A. (1988) Measurements of concentrations and dry
        surface fluxes of atmospheric  nitrates in the presence of ammonia. J. Geophys. Res. [Atmos.]
        93: 7127-7136.             ,                                                .   .    ,

Husar, R. B.  (1986) Emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides and trends for Eastern North America.  In:
        Acid deposition: long-term trends. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; pp. 48-92.

Hutchinson, G. E. (1973) Eutrophication: the scientific background of a contemporary practical problem. Am.
        Sci. 61: 269-279.

Hutchinson, G. L.; Mosier, A. R. (1979) Nitrous oxide emissions from an irrigated,cornfield. Science  ,
        (Washington, DC) 205:  1125-1127.

Hutchinson, G. L.; Millington, R. J.; Peters, D. B. (1972) Atmospheric ammonia: absorption by plant leaves.
        Science (Washington, DC) 175: 771-772.

Ingestad, T. (1980) Nutrition and growth of birch and gray alder seedlings in low conductivity solutions and at
        varied relative rates of nutrient addition. Physiol. Plant. 52: 454-466.

James, B. R.; Riha, S. J. (1989) Aluminum leaching by mineral acids in forest soils: I. nitric-sulfuric acid
        differences. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.  53: 259-264.

Jarvis, P. G. (1971) The estimation of resistances to  carbon dioxide transfer. In: Sestak, Z.; Catsky,  J.; Jarvis,
        P. G., eds. Plant  photosynthetic production: manual of methods. The Hague, The Netherlands:
        Dr W. Junk N.V. Publishers; pp.  566,  608-609.                     -
 August 1991
10-258
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Jarvis, P. G.; Catsky, J.; Eckardt, F. E.; Koch, W.; Koller, D. (1971) General principles of gasometric methods
       and the main aspects of installation design. In: Sestak, Z.; Catsky, J.; Jarvis, P. G., eds. Plant
       photosynthetic production: manual of methods. The Hague, The Netherlands: Dr W. Junk N. V.
      • Publishers; pp. 49-110.

Jaworski, N. A. (1981) Sources of nutrients and the scale of eutrophication problems in estuaries. In: Neilson,
       B. J.; Cronin, L. E., eds. Estuaries and nutrients. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press; pp. 83-110.

Jefferies, R. L.; Perkins, N. (1977) The effects on the vegetation of the additions of inorganic nutrients to salt
       marsh soils at Stiffkey, Norfolk. J. Ecol. 65:^867-882.

Jeffries, D. S. (1990) Snowpack storage of pollutants, release during melting, and impact on receiving  waters. In:
       Norton, S. A.; Lindberg, S. E;; Page, A. L., eds. Acidic precipitation: v. 4, soils, aquatic processes,
       and lake acidification. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; pp.  107-132.

Jenkins, M. C.; Kemp, W. M. (1984) The coupling of nitrification and denitrification in two estuarine
       sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 29: 609-619.             "
                                                              '                 '       • '.;•'.
Jenkinson, D. S. (1970) The accumulation of organic matter in soil left uncultivated. Comm. Bur. Soil Sci.
       Rothamstad Exp. Sta. Rep. for 1970.

Jensen,' A. (1985) The effect of cattle and sheep grazing on salt-marsh vegetation at  Skallingen, Denmark.
       Vegetatio60: 37-48.  .'••-'.

Johannessen, M.; Henriksen, A. (1978) Chemistry of snow meltwater: changes in concentration during melting.
       Water Resour. Res. 14: 615-619.

Johannessen, M.; Skartveit, A.;  Wright, R. F. (1980) Streamwater chemistry before, during and after snowmelt.
       In: Drablos, D.; Tollan, A., eds. Ecological impact of acid precipitation: proceedings of an international
       conference; March; Sandefjord, Norway. Oslo, Norway: SNSF project; pp.  224-225.

Johansson, C. (1987) Pine forest: a negligible sink for atmospheric NOX in rural Sweden. Tellus Ser. B
        39: 426-438.                                 ,                '

Johansson; C.; Granat, L.  (1986) An experimental study of the dry deposition Of gaseous nitric acid to snow..
        Atmos. Environ. 20: 1165-1170.

John, W.; Wall, S. M.;  Ondo, J. L. (1985) Dry acid deposition on materials and vegetation: concentrations in
        ambient air. Berkeley, CA:  California Department of Health Services, Air and Industrial Hygiene
        Laboratory;  report no. CA/DOH/AIHL/SP-34.

Johnson, A. H. (1983) Red spruce decline in the northeastern U.S.: hypotheses regarding the role of acid ram.
        J.  Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 33: 1049-1054.

Johnson, D. W.; Edwards, N. T. (1979) The effects  of stem girdling on biogeochemical cycles within a mixed
        deciduous forest in eastern Tennessee: II. soil nitrogen mineralization and nitrification rates. Oecologia
        40: 259-271.                                                             :                   '

Johnson,  D.  W.; Lindberg, S. E., eds. (n.d.) Atmospheric deposition and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems.
        New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; in  press.       •                 *

 Johnson,  D. W.; Todd,  D. E. (1987) Nutrient export by leaching and whole-tree harvesting in a loblolly pine
        and mixed oak forest. Plant Soil 102: 99-109.
  August 1991
10-259       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Johnson, D. W.; Todd, D. E. (1988) Nitrogen fertilization of young yellow poplar and loblolly pine plantations
       at differing frequencies. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52: 1468-1477.

Johnson, D. W.; van Miegroet, H.; Lindberg, S. E.; Harrison, R. B.; Todd, D. E. (n.d.) Nutrient cycling in red
       spruce forests of the Great Smoky Mountains. Can. J. For. Res.: in press.

Johnson, N. M.; Likens, G. E.; Bormann, F. H.; Fisher, D. W.; Pierce, R.  S. (1969) A working model for the
       variation in stream water chemistry at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. Water
       Resour. Res. 5: 1353-1363.

Johnson, D. W.; Cole, D. W.; Gessel, S. P.; Singer, M. J.; Minden, R. V. (1977) Carbonic acid leaching in a
       tropical, temperate, subalpine and northern forest soil. Arct. Alp.  Res. 9: 329-343.

Johnson, N. M.; Driscoll, C. T.; Eaton, J. S.; Likens, G. E.; McDowell, W. H. (1981) "Acid rain", dissolved
       aluminum and chemical weathering at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire.
       Geochim. Cosmochim.  Acta 45: 1421-1437.

Johnson, D. W.; Richter, D. D.; Lovett, G. M.; Lindberg,  S. E. (1985) The effects of atmospheric deposition
       on potassium, calcium,  and magnesium cycling in two deciduous forests. Can. J. For. Res. 15: 773-782.

Jones, H. C.; Noggle, J. C.; Young, R. C.; Kelly, J. M.; Olem, H.; Ruane, R. J.; Pasch, R. W.; Hyfantis,
       G. J.; Parkhurst, W. J. (1983) Investigations of the cause of fishkills in fish-rearing facilities in Raven
       Fork watershed. Chattanooga, TN: Tennessee Valley Authority, Office of Natural Resources; report no.
       TVA/ONR/WR-83-9.

Jordan, T. E.; Correll, D. L.; Whigham, D. F.  (1983) Nutrient flux in the Rhode River: tidal exchange of
       nutrients by brackish marshes. Estuarine Coastal  Shelf Sci. 17: 651-667.

Joslin, J. D.; Wolfe, M. H. (1988) Responses of red spruce seedlings to changes to soil aluminum in six
       amended forest soil horizons. Can. J. For. Res. 18:  1614-1623.

Joslin, J. D.; Mays, P. A.; Wolfe, M.iH.; Kelly,  J. M.; Garber, R. W.;  Brewer, P. F.  (1987)  Chemistry of
       tension lysimeter water and lateral flow in spruce and hardwood stands. J. Environ. Qual. 16: 152-160.

Judeikis, H. S.; Wren, A. G. (1978) Laboratory measurements of NO and NO2 depositions onto soil and cement
       surfaces. Atmos. Environ.  12: 2315-2319.

Jurgensen, M. F.; Harvey, A. E.; Larsen, M. J. (1981) Effects of prescribed fire on soil nitrogen levels in a
       cutover Douglas-fir/western larch forest. Ogden,  UT: U. S.  Department of Agriculture Forest Service,
       Intermt. Forest and Range Experiment Station; research paper INT-275.

Kadlec, J. A. (1986) Input-output nutrient budgets for small diked marshes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.
       43: 2009-2016.

Kahl, J. S.; Norton, S. A.; Cronan, C. A.; Fernandez, I. J.; Bacon, L. C.; Haines, T. A. (1991) Maine. In:
       Charles, D. F., ed. Acidic deposition and aquatic ecosystems: regional case studies. New York, NY:
       Springer Verlag.

Kanciruk, P.; Eilers, J. M.; McCord, R. A.; Landers, D. H.; Brakke, D. F.; Linthurst, R. A. (1986)
       Characteristics of lakes  in the eastern United States. Volume III: data compendium of site characteristics
       and chemical variables.  Washington,  DC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Acid
       Deposition, Environmental Monitoring, and Quality  Assurance; EPA report no. EPA-600/4-86-007c.
       Available from: NTIS,  Springfield, VA; PB87-110409/REB.
 August 1991
10-260
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Katz, B. G.; Bricker, O. P.; Kennedy, M. M. (1985) Geochemical mass-balance relationships for selected ions in
       precipitation and stream water, Catoctin Mountains, Maryland. Am. J. Sci. 285: 931-962.

Kaufmann, P. R.; Herlihy, A. T.; Elwood, J. W.; Mitch, M. E.; Overton, W. S.; Sale, M. J.; Messer, J. J.;
       Cougan, K. A.; Peck, D. V.; Reckhow, K. H.; Kinney, A. J.;  Christie, S. J.; Brown, D. D.; Hagley,
       C. A.; Jager, H. I. (1988) Chemical characteristics of streams in the mid-Atlantic and southeastern
       United States (national stream survey - phase I). Volume I: Population descriptions and physico-chemical
       relationships. Washington, DC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Acid Deposition,
       Environmental Monitoring and Quality Assurance; EPA report no. EPA-600/3-88-021a.

Kaufmann, P. R.; Herlihy, A. T.; Mitch, M. E.; Messer, J. J.; Overton, W. S. (1991) Stream chemistry in the
       eastern United States: 1. synoptic survey design, acid-base status, and regional patterns. Water Resour.
       Res. 27: 611-627.

Kaushik, N. K.; Robinson, J. B.; Sain, P.; Whitely, H. R.;  Stammers,  W. N. (1975) A quantitative study of
       nitrogen loss from water of a small spring-fed stream. Water Pollut. Res. J. Can. 10: 110-117.

Keddy, P. A.; Wisheu, I. C. (1989) Ecology, biogeography, and conservation of coastal plain plants: some
       general principles from the study of Nova Scotian wetlands. Rhodora 91: 72-94.

Keeney, D. R.; Chen, R. L.; Graetz, D. A. (1971) Importance of denitrification and nitrate reduction in
       sediments to the nitrogen budgets of lakes. Nature (London) 233: 66-67.

Kelly, J. M. (1988) Annual elemental input/output estimates for two forested watersheds in eastern Tennessee.
       J. Environ.  Qual. 17: 463-468.

Kelly, J. M.; Henderson, G. S.  (1978) Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus additions on deciduous litter
       decomposition. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42: 972-976.

Kelly, J. M.; Meagher, J. F. (1986) Nitrogen input/output relationships for three forested watersheds in eastern
       Tennessee. In: Correll, D. L., ed. Watershed research perspectives. Washington, DC: Smithsonian
       Institution Press; pp. 360-391.

Kelly, C. A.; Rudd, J. W. M.; Cook, R. B.; Schindler, D. W. (1982) The potential importance of bacterial
       processes in regulating rate of lake acidification. Limnol. Oceanogr. 27: 868-882.

Kelly, T. J.; Tanner, R. L.;  Newman,  L.; Galvin, P. J.; Kadlecek, J. A. (1984) Trace gas and aerosol
       measurements at a remote site in the northeast U.S. Atmos. Environ.  18: 2565-2576.

Kelly, T. J.; McLaren, S. E.; Kadlecek, J. A. (1989) Seasonal variations in atmospheric SOX and NOy species in
       the Adirondacks. Atmos. Environ. 23: 1315-1332.

Kelly, C. A.; Rudd, J. W. M.; Schindler, D. W. (1990) Acidification by nitric acid - future considerations.
       Water Air Soil Pollut. 50: 49-61.

Kenk, G.; Fischer, H. (1988) Evidence from nitrogen fertilisation in the forests of Germany. Environ. Pollut.
       54: 199-218.

Kilham, P.; Hecky, R. E. (1988) Comparative ecology of marine and freshwater phytoplankton. Limnol.
       Oceanogr. 33: 776-795.

King, D.; Nedwell, D. B. (1985) The influence of nitrate concentration upon the end-products of nitrate
       dissimilation by bacteria in anaerobic salt marsh sediment. FEMS Microbiol.  Ecol.  31: 23-28.
 August 1991
10-261
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Kisser-Priesack, G. M.; Scheunert, I.; Gnatz, G.; Ziegler, H. (1987) Uptake of 1SNO2 and 1SNO by plant
       cuticles. Naturwissenschaften 74: 550-551.

Klein, R. M.; Perkins, T. D. (1987)  Cascades of causes and effects of forest decline. Ambio 16: 86-93.

Klein, T. M.; Kreitinger, J. P.; Alexander, M. (1983) Nitrate formation in acid forest soils from the
       Adirondacks. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47: 506-508.

Klemedtsson, L.; Svensson, B. H. (1988) Effects of acid deposition on denitrification and N2O-emission from
       forest soils. In: Nilsson, J.; Grennfelt, P.,  eds. Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen: report from a
       workshop; March; Skokloster, Sweden. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers;
       pp. 343-362.

Klepper, L. (1979) Nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NOj) emissions from herbicide-treated soybean
       plants. Atmos. Environ. 13: 537-542.

Klubek, B.; Eberhardt, P. J.; Skujins, J. (1978) Ammonia volatilization from Great Basin desert soils. In: West,
       N. E.j Skujins, J., eds. Nitrogen in desert ecosystems. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross,
       Inc.; pp. 107-131. (US/IBP synthetic series 9).

Knowles, R. (1982) Denitrification. Microbiol. Rev. 46: 43-70.

Koerselman, W.; Bakker, S. A.; Blom; M. (1990) Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium budgets for  two small
       fens surrounded by heavily fertilized pastures. J. Ecol. 78: 428-442.

Kolb, W.; Martin, P. (1988) Influence of nitrogen on the number of N2-fixing and total bacteria in the
       rhizosphere. Soil Biol. Biochem. 20: 221-225.

Kowalenko, C. G.; Ivarson, K. C.; Cameron, D. R. (1978) Effect of moisture content,  temperature  and nitrogen
       fertilization on carbon dioxide evolution from field soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10: 417-423.

Kozlowski, T. T.  (1980) Impacts of air pollution on forest ecosystems. Bioscience 30: 88-93.

Kramer, J. R.; Andren, A. W.; Smith, R.  A.; Johnson, A. H.; Alexander, R. B.;  Oehlert,  G. (1986) Streams
       and lakes. In: Acid deposition: long-term trends. Washington, DC: National Academy Press;
       pp. 231-299.

Kramm, G. (1989) A numerical method for determining the dry deposition of atmospheric trace gases. Boundary
       Layer Meteorol. 48: 157-175.

Krause, G. H. M. (1988) Impact of air pollutants on above-ground plant parts of forest trees. In: Mathy, P., ed.
       Air pollution and ecosystems: proceedings  of an international symposium; May  1987; Grenoble, France.
       Boston, MA: D. Reidel Publishing Company; pp.  168-197.

Kuenzler, E.  J.; Craig, N. J.  (1986) Land use and nutrient yields of the Chowan River watershed. In: Correll,
       D. L., ed. Watershed research perspectives. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press; pp. 77-107.

Lamb, D. (1980) Soil nitrogen mineralisation in a  secondary rainforest succession. Oecologia 47: 257-263.
 August 1991
10-262
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Landers, D. H.; Eilers, J. M.; Brakke, D. F.; Overton, W. S.; Kellar, P. E.; Silverstein, M. E.; Schbnbrod,
       R. D.; Crowe, R. E.; Linthurst, R. A.; Omernik, J. M.; Teague, S. A.; Meier, E. P. (1987) Western
       lake survey phase I: characteristics of lakes in the western United States, volume I: population
       descriptions and physico-chemical relationships. Washington, DC: U. S. Environmental Protection
       Agency, Office of Acid Deposition, Environmental Monitoring and Quality Assurance; EPA report no.
       EPA/600/3-86-054A. Available from: NTIS,  Springfield, VA; PB88-146824/REB.

Landsberg, J. J. (1986) Experimental approaches to the study of the effects of nutrients and water on carbon
       assimilation by trees. Tree Physiol. 2: 427-444.

Larsson, U.; Elmgren, R.; Wulff, F. (1985) Eutrophication and the Baltic Sea: causes and consequences. Ambio
        14: 9-14.

Law, R. M.; Mansfield, T. A. (1982) Oxides of nitrogen and the greenhouse atmosphere. In: Unsworth, M. H.;
       Ormrod, D. P., eds. Effects of gaseous air pollution in agriculture and horticulture. London, United
       Kingdom: Butterworth Scientific; pp. 93-112.

LaZerte, B. D.; Dillon, P. J. (1984) Relative importance of anthropogenic versus natural sources of acidity in
       lakes and streams of central Ontario. Can. J.  Fish.  Aquat. Sci. 41: 1664-1677.

Lee, J. A.; Press, M. C.; Woodin, S. J. (1986) Effects of NO2 on aquatic ecosystems. In: Environment and
       quality of life: study on the need for an NO2  long-term limit value for the protection  of terrestrial and
     '  aquatic ecosystems. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities; pp. 99-119.

Lefohn, A. S.; Tingey, D. T. (1984) The co-occurrence of potentially phytotoxic concentrations of various
       gaseous air pollutants. Atmos. Environ. 1.8: 2521-2526.

Lemon, E.; van Houtte, R. (1980) Ammonia exchange at the land surface. Agron. J. 72: 876-883.

Lendzian,  K. J.; Kerstiens,  G. (1988) Interactions between plant cuticles and gaseous air pollutants. Aspects
       Appl. Biol. 17: 97-104.

Leuven, R. S. E. W.; Wolfs, W. J. (1988) Effects of water acidification  on the decomposition ofJuncus
       bulbosus L. Aquat. Bot... 31: 57-81.

Levy, H., II; Moxim, W. J. (1987) Fate of US and Canadian combustion nitrogen emissions. Nature (London)
        328: 414-416.

Likens, G. E., ed. (1972) Nutrients and eutrophication: the limiting-nutrient controversy:  proceedings of the
        symposium; Feb. 1971; East Lansing, MI. Lawrence, KS: American Society of Limnology and
        Oceanography, Inc. (Special symposia volume I).

Likens, G. E., ed. (1985) An ecosystem approach to  aquatic ecology: Mirror Lake and its environment. New
        York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

Likens, G. E.; Bormann, F. H.; Johnson, N. M.; Fisher, D. W.; Pierce,  R. S. (1970) Effects of forest cutting
        and herbicide treatment on nutrient budgets in the Hubbard Brook watershed-ecosystem.  Ecol. Monogr.
        40:23-47.

Likens, G. E.; Bormann, F. H.; Pierce, R. S.;  Eaton, J. S.; Johnson, N.  M. (1977) Biogeochemistry of a
        forested ecosystem. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, Inc.

Likens, G. E.; Bormann, F. H.; Pierce, R. S.;  Eaton, J. S.; Munn, R. E. (1984) Long-term trends in
        precipitation chemistry at Hubbard Brook, New Hampshire. Atmos. Environ. 18:  2641-2647.
  August 1991
10-263
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Liljelund, L.-E.; Torstensson, P. (1988) Critical load of nitrogen with regards to effects on plant composition.
       In: Nilsson, J.; Grennfelt, P., eds. Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen: report from a workshop;
       March; Skokloster, Sweden. Copenhagen,  Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers; pp. 363-373.

Lindau, C. W.; De Laune, R. D.; Jones, G. L. (1988) Fate of added nitrate and ammonium-nitrogen entering a
       Louisiana gulf coast swamp forest. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 60: 386-390.

Lindberg, S. E.; Lovett, G. M.  (1985) Field measurements of particle dry deposition rates to foliage and inert
       surfaces in a forest canopy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19: 238-244.

Lindberg, S. E.; Lovett, G. M.; Richter, D. D.; Johnson, D.  W. (1986) Atmospheric deposition and canopy
       interactions of major ions in a forest. Science (Washington, DC) 231:  141-145.

Lindberg, S. E.; Lovett, G. M.; Meiwes, K.-J. (1987) Deposition and forest canopy interactions of airborne
       nitrate. In: Hutchinson, T. C.; Meema, K. M.,  eds. Effects of atmospheric pollutants on forests,
       wetlands and agricultural ecosystems. Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany: Springer-Verlag;
       pp. 117-130. (NATO as 1 series: v.  G16).

Lindsay, W. L. (1979) Chemical equilibria in soils. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Linsey, G. A.; Schindler, D. W.; Stainton, M. P. (1987) Atmospheric deposition of nutrients and major ions at
       the Experimental Lakes Area in northwestern Ontario,  1970 to 1982. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44
       (suppl. 1): 206-214.

Linthurst, R. A.; Landers, D. H.; Eilers, J.  M.; Brakke, D. F.; Overton,  W. S.; Meier, E. P.; Crowe, R. E.
       (1986) Characteristics of lakes in the eastern United States. Volume I. Population descriptions and
       physico-chemical relationships. Washington, DC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,  Office of Acid
       Deposition, Environmental Monitoring, and Quality Assurance; EPA report no. EPA-600/4-86-007a.
       Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB87-110383.

Lockyer, D. R.; Whitehead,  D.  C. (1986) The uptake of gaseous ammonia by the leaves of Italian  ryegrass.
       J. Exp. Bot. 37: 919-927.

Lodhi, M. A. K. (1978) Comparative inhibition of nitrifiers and nitrification in  a forest community as a result of
        the allelopathic nature of various tree species. Am. J. Bot. 65: 1135-1137.

Loftis, J. S.; Ward, R. C.; Phillips, R. D.;  Taylor, C.  H.  (1989) An evaluation of trend detection techniques for
       use in water quality monitoring programs. Research Triangle Park, NC:  U. S. Environmental Protection
        Agency; EPA  report no. EPA-600/3-89-037.

Logofet, D.  O.; Alexandrov, G. A. (1984) Modelling of matter cycle in a mesotrophic bog ecosystem:
        n. dynamic model and ecological succession. Ecol. Modell. 21: 259-276.

Loranger, T. J.; Brakke, D.  F. (1988) The extent of snowpack influence on water chemistry in a North Cascades
        lake. Water Resour. Res. 24: 723-726.

Loranger, T. J.; Brakke, D.  F.; Bonoff, M. B.; Gall, B. F. (1986) Temporal variability of lake waters in the
        North Cascades Mountains (Washington, U.S.A.). Water Air Soil Pollut. 31: 123-129.

Lovett, G. (1991) Atmospheric deposition and canopy interactions of nitrogen. In: Johnson, D. W.; Lindberg,
        S. E., eds. Atmospheric deposition and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems. New York, NY:
        Springer-Verlag; in press.
  August 1991
10-264       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Lovett, G. M.; Lindberg, S. E. (1984) Dry deposition and canopy exchange in a mixed oak forest as determined
       by analysis of throughfall. J. Appl. Ecol. 21:  1013-1027.

Lovett, G. M.; Lindberg, S. E. (1986) Dry deposition of nitrate to a deciduous forest.  Biogeochemistry
       2: 137-148.

Lovett, G. M.; Reiners, W. A.; Olson, R. K. (1982)  Cloud droplet deposition in subalpine balsam fir forests:
       hydrological and chemical inputs. Science (Washington, DC) 218: 1303-1304.

Lbwranee, R. R.; Leonard, R. A. (1988) Streamflow nutrient dynamics on coastal plain watersheds. J. Environ.
       Qual. 17: 734-740.

Lowrance, R. R.; Leonard, R. A.; Asmussen, L. E.;  Todd, R.  L. (1985) Nutrient budgets for agricultural
       watersheds in the southeastern coastal plain. Ecology 66: 287-296.

Loye-Pilot, M. D.; Martin, J. M.; Morelli, J. (1990)  Atmospheric input of inorganic nitrogen to the Western
       Mediterranean. Biogeochemistry 9: 117-134.

Lynch, J. A.; Hanna,  C. M.; Corbett, E. S.  (1986) Predicting pH, alkalinity, and total acidity in stream water
       during episodic events. Water Resour. Res. 22: 905-912.

Manny, B. A.; Owens, R. W. (1983) Additions of nutrients and major ions by the atmosphere and tributaries to
       nearshore waters of northwestern Lake Huron. J. Great Lakes Res. 9: 403-420.

Margolis, H. A.; Waring, R. H. (1986) Carbon and nitrogen allocation patterns of Douglas-fir seedlings
       fertilized with nitrogen in autumn. II. Field performance. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 903-909.

Marinucci, A. C.; Hobbie, J. E.; Helfrich, J. V. K. (1983) Effect of litter nitrogen on decomposition and
       microbial biomass in Spartina alterniflora. Microb. Ecol. 9: 27-40.

Marshall, J. D.; Cadle,  S. H. (1989) Evidence for trans-cuticular uptake of HNO3 vapor by foliage of eastern
       white pine (Pinus strobus L.). Environ.  Pollut. 60: 15-28.

Matson,  P. A.; Harriss, R. C. (1988) Prospects for aircraft-based gas exchange measurements in ecosystem
       studies. Ecology 69: 1318-1325.

Matson,  P. A.; Vitousek, P. M. (1990) Ecosystem approach to a global nitrous oxide budget. Bioscience
       40: 667-672.

Matzner, E. (1983) Balances of element fluxes within different  ecosystems impacted by acid rain. In: Ulrich, B.;
       Pankrath, J., eds. Effects of accumulation  of air pollutants  in forest ecosystems: proceedings of a
       workshop; May 1982; Goettingen, Federal Republic of Germany. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel
       Publishing Company; pp. 147-155.

Matzner, E.; Khanna, P. K.; Meiwes, K. J.; Ulrich, B. (1983) Effects of fertilization on the  fluxes of chemical
       elements through different forest ecosystems.  Plant Soil 74: 343-358.

Mazzarino, M. J.; Heinrichs, H.; Foelster, H. (1983) Holocene versus accelerated actual proton consumption in
       German forest soils. In: Ulrich, B.; Pankrath, J., eds. Effects of accumulation of air pollutants in forest
        ecosystems: proceedings of a workshop; May 1982; Goettingen, Federal Republic of  Germany.
        Dordrecht, The Netherlands:  D. Reidel Publishing  Company; pp. 113-123.

McAvoy, D. C. (1989) Episodic response of aluminum chemistry in an acid-sensitive Massachusetts catchment.
        Water Resour. Res, 25: 233-240.
  August 1991
10-265
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
McCarthy, J. J. (1981) The kinetics of nutrient utilization. Can., Bull. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 210: 211-233..

McCauley, E.; Downing, J. A.; Watson, S. (1989) Sigmoid relationships between nutrients and chlorophyll
       among lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46: 1171-1175.

McComb, A. J.; Atkins, R. P.; Birch, P. B.; Gordon, D. M.; Lukatelich, R. J. (1981) Eutrophication in the
       Peel-Harvey estuarine system, Western Australia. In:  Neilson, B. J.; Cronin, L. E.,  eds. Estuaries and
       nutrients. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press; pp. 323-342.

McHugh, J. L. (1976) Estuarine fisheries: are they doomed? In: Wiley, M. L., ed. Estuarine processes: v. 1.
       New York, NY: Academic Press; pp. 15-27.

McLaughlin, S. B. (1985) Effects of air pollution on forests:  a critical review. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc.
       35: 512-534.

McMahon, T. A.; Denison, P.  J. (1979) Empirical atmospheric deposition parameters—a survey. Atmos.
       Environ. 13: 571-585.

McMillen,  R. T. (1988) An eddy correlation technique with extended applicability to non-simple terrain.
       Boundary Layer Meteorol. 43: 231-245.

McNulty, S. G.; Aber, J. D.; McLellan, T. M.;  Katt, S. M.  (1990) Nitrogen cycling in high elevation forests of
       the northeastern US in relation to nitrogen deposition. Ambio 19: 38-40.

Mead, D. J.; Pritchett, W. L. (1975) Fertilizer movement in  a slash pine ecosystem: II. N distribution after two
       growing seasons. Plant  Soil 43: 467-478.

Meams, A. J.; Haines, E.; Kleppel, G. S.; McGrath, R. A.;  McLaughlin, J. J. A.; Segar, D.  A.; Sharp, J. H.;
       Walsh, J. J.; Word, J. Q.; Young, D. K.; Young, M. W. (1982) Effects of nutrients and carbon loadings
       on  communities and ecosystems. In: Mayer, G. F., ed. Ecological stress and the New York Bight:
       science and management: proceedings of a symposium on the ecological effects of environmental, stress;
       June 1979; New York,  NY. Columbia, SC: Estuarine Research Federation; pp. 53-65.

Melack, J.  M.; Stoddard, J. L.  (1991) Sierra Nevada. In: Charles, D. F., ed. Acidic deposition and aquatic
       ecosystems:  regional case studies. New York, NY: Springer Verlag; In press.

Melack, J.  M.; Kilham, P.; Fisher, T. R. (1982) Responses of phytoplankton to experimental fertilization with
       ammonium and phosphate in an African soda lake.  Oecologia 52: 321-326.

Melack, J.  M.; Cooper, S. D.;  Holmes, R. W.; Sickman, J. O.; Kratz, K.; Hopkins, P.; Hardenbergh, H.;
       Thime, M.;  Meeker, L. (1987) Chemical and biological survey of lakes and streams  located in the
       Emerals Lake watershed, Sequoia National Park.  Sacramento, CA: California Air Resources Board;
       report no. A3-096-32.

Melillo, J.  M.; Aber, J. D.; Steudler, P. A.; Schimel, J. P. (1983) Denitrification potentials in a successional
       sequence of northern hardwood forest stands. In:  Hallberg, R., ed. Environmental biogeochemistry:
       proceedings of the 5th international symposium on environmental biogeochemistry; June 1981;
       Stockholm, Sweden. Ecol. Bull. 35: 217-228.

Melillo, J.  M.; Naiman, R. J.;  Aber, J. D.; Linkins,  A.  E. (1984) Factors controlling mass  loss and nitrogen
       dynamics of plant litter decaying in northern streams. Bull. Mar. Sci.  35: 341-356.
 August 1991
10-266
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Melillo, J. M.; Steudler, P. A.!; Aber, J. D.; Bowden, R. D. (1989) Atmospheric deposition and nutrient
       cycling. In: Andreae, M. O.; Schimel, D. S., eds. Exchange of trace gases between terrestrial ecosystems
       and the atmosphere: report of the Dahlem workshop; February; Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany.
       New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; pp. 263-280.

Melin, J.; Nommik, H.; Lohm, U.; Flower-Ellis, J.  (1983) Fertilizer nitrogen budget in a Scots pine ecosystem
       attained by using root-isolated plots and 15N tracer technique. Plant Soil 74: 249-263.

Menge, J. A.; Grand, L., F.; Haines, L. W. (1977) The effect of fertilization on growth and mycorrhizae
       numbers in 11-year-old loblolly pine plantations. For. Sci. 23: 37-44.

Messer, J. J.;  Ho, J.; Grenney, W. J. (1984) Ionic strength correction for extent of ammonia ionization in
       freshwater. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41:  811-815.

Messer, J. J.;  Ariss, C. W.; Baker, J. R.;  Drouse, S. K.;  Eshleman, K. N.; Kinney, A. J.; Overton, W. S.;
       Sale, M. J.; Schonbrod, R. D. (1988) Stream chemistry in the southern Blue Ridge: feasibility of a
       regional synoptic sampling approach. Water Resour. Bull. 24:  821-829.

Meyer, J. L. (1979) The role of sediments and bryophytes in phosphorus dynamics in a headwater stream
       ecosystem. Limnol. Oceanogr. 24: 365-375.

Meyer, J. L.;  Likens, G. E. (1979) Transport and transformation of phosphorus in a forest stream ecosystem.
       Ecology 60: 1255-1269.

Meyers,  T. P.; Hicks, B.  B. (1988) Dry deposition of O3, SO2, and HNO3 to different vegetation in the same
       exposure environment. Environ. Pollut. 53:  13-25.

Meyers,  T. P.; Huebert, B. J.; Hicks, B. B. (1989)  HNO3 deposition  to a deciduous forest. Boundary Layer
        Meteorol. 49: 395-410.

Miller, P. L.  (1973) Oxidant-induced community change in a mixed conifer forest. In: Naegele, J. A., ed. Air
        pollution damage to vegetation. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; pp. 101-117.  (Advances
        in chemistry series: no. 122).

 Miller, H. G. (1981) Forest fertilization: some guiding concepts. Forestry 54: 157-167.

 Miller, H. G.; Miller, J. D. (1988) Response to heavy  nitrogen applications in fertilizer experiments in British
        forests. Environ. Pollut. 54: 219-231.

 Miller, H. G.; Miller, J. D.; Pauline, O. J. L. (1976) Effect of nitrogen supply on nutrient uptake in Corsican
        pine.  J. Appl. Ecol. 13: 955-966.

 Mitsch,  W. J.; Gosselink, J. G. (1986) Wetlands. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

 Mollitor, A. V.; Raynal,  D.  J. (1982) Atmospheric deposition and ionic input in Adirondack forests. J. Air
        Pollut. Control Assoc. 33:  1032-1036.

 Molot, L. A.; Dillon, P.  J.;  LaZerte, B. D. (1989) Factors affecting  alkalinity concentrations of streamwater
        during snowmelt in central Ontario. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46: 1658-1666.

 Montagnini, F.; Haines, B. L.; Swank, W. T.; Waide, J. B. (1989) Nitrification in undisturbed mixed
        hardwoods and manipulated forests in  the southern Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina,  USA. Can.
        J. For. Res.  19: 1226-1234.
   August 1991
10-267      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Moore, B., HI; Bolin, B. (1986) The oceans, carbon dioxide, and global climate change. Oceanus 29(4): 9-15.

 Moore, D. R. J.; Keddy, P. A. (1989) The relationship between species richness and standing crop in wetlands:
        the importance of scale. Vegetatio 79: 99-106.

 Moore, I. D.; Nuckols, J. R. (1984) Relationship between atmospheric nitrogen deposition and the stream
        nitrogen profile. J. Hydrol. 74: 81-103.

 Moore, D. R. J.; Keddy, P. A.; Gaudet, C.  L.; Wisheu, I. C. (1989) Conservation of wetlands: do infertile
        wetlands deserve a higher priority? Biol.  Conserv.  47: 203-217.

 Moorhead, D. L.; Reynolds, J. F.; Whitford, W. G. (1986) A conceptual model for primary productivity,
        decomposition and nitrogen cycling in the Chihuahuan creosotebush desert. Tree Physiol. 2: 215-222.

 Morgan, M. D.; Good, R. E. (1988) Stream chemistry in the New Jersey Pinelands: the influence of
        precipitation and watershed disturbance. Water Resour. Res. 24: 1091-1100.

 Morris, J. T. (1982) A model of growth responses by Spartina alterniflora to nitrogen limitation. J. Ecol.
        70: 25-42.

 Morris, J. T. (1988) Pathways and controls of the carbon cycle in salt marshes. In: Hook, D. D. et al., eds. The
        ecology and management of wetlands. London, United Kingdom: Groom Helm; pp. 497-510.

 Morris, J. T.; Lajtha, K. (1986) Decomposition and nutrient dynamics of litter from four species of freshwater
        emergent macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 131: 215-223.

 Morris, D. P.; Lewis, W. M., Jr. (1988) Phytoplankton nutrient limitation in Colorado mountain lakes.
       Freshwater Biol. 20: 315-327.

 Morris, J. T.; Houghton, R. A.; Botkin, D. B. (1984) Theoretical limits of belowground production by Spartina
       alterniflora: an analysis through modelling. Ecol. Modell. 26: 155-175.

 Morrison, I. K.; Foster, N. W.  (1977) Fate of urea fertilizer added to a boreal forest Pinus bariksiana Lamb.
       stand.  Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41: 441-448.

 Mortland, M. M. (1965) Nitric oxide adsorption by clay minerals. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 29: 514-519.

 Mulder, J.; van Grinsven, J. J. M.; van Breemen, N. (1987) Impacts of acid atmospheric deposition on
       woodland soils in the Netherlands: HI. aluminum chemistry. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51: 1640-1646.

 Mulholland, P. J.; Palumbo, A. V.; Elwood, J. W.; Rosemond, A. D. (1987) Effects of acidification on leaf
       decomposition in streams. J. N. Am.  Benthol. Soc. 6: 147-158.

 Munger, J. W.; Eisenreich, S. J. (1983) Continental-scale variations in precipitation chemistry. Environ. Sci.
       Technol. 17:  32A-42A.

Murdoch, P. S.;  Stoddard, J. L. (n.d.) The importance of nitrate in the acidification of Catskill Mountain
       streams. Water Resour. Res.: Submitted.

Murray, A. J.  S. (1984) Light affects the deposition of NO2 to theflacca mutant of tomato without affecting the
       rate of transpiration. New Phytol. 98: 447-450.

Nadelhoffer, K. J.; Aber, J. D.; Melillo, J. M. (1985)  Fine roots, net primary production, and soil nitrogen
       availability: a new hypothesis. Ecology 66: 1377-1390.
 August 1991
10-268      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
National Atmospheric Deposition Program. (1988) NADP/NTN annual data summary. Fort Collins, CO:
       National Atmospheric Deposition Program/National Trends Network Coordination Office.

National Research Council. (1969) Eutrophication: causes, consequences, correctives. Washington, DC:  National
       Academy of Sciences.

National Research Council. (1978) Nitrates: an environmental assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy
     ,  of Sciences.

National Research Council. (1979) Ammonia. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press; p. 291.

National Research Council Canada. (1981) Acidification in the Canadian aquatic environment: scientific criteria
       for assessing the effects of acidic deposition on aquatic ecosystems.  Ottawa, ON,  Canada: Environmental
       Secretariat; report no. NRCC 18475.

Neely, R. K.; Davis, C. B. (1985a) Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization of Sparganium eurycarpum Engelm.
       and Typha glauca Godr. stands. I. Emergent plant production. Aquat.  Bot. 22: 347-361.

Neely, R. K.; Davis, C. B. (1985b) Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization of Sparganium eurycarpum Engelm.
       and Typha glauca Godr. stands. II. Emergent plant decomposition. Aquat. Bot. 22: 363-375.

Newbold, J. D.; Elwood, J.  W.; O'Neill, R. V.; Sheldon, A.  L. (1983) Phosphorus dynamics in a woodland
       stream ecosystem: a study  of nutrient spiralling. Ecology 64: 1249-1265.

Newell, A. D.; Powers, C. F.; Christie, S. J. (1987) Analysis of data from long-terra monitoring of lakes. U. S.
       Environmental Protection Agency; EPA report no. EPA-600/4-87-014.

Nicholson, K. W. (1988) The dry deposition of small particles: a review of experimental measurements. Atmos.
       Environ. 22: 2653-2666.

Nihlgard, B.  (1985) The ammonium hypothesis - an additional explanation to  the forest dieback in Europe.
       Ambio 14: 2-8.

Nilsson,  J., ed. (1986) Critical loads for nitrogen and sulfur. Copenhagen,  Denmark: Nordic Council of
       Ministers.

Nilsson, J.; Grennfelt, P., eds. (1988) Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen: report from a workshop; March;
        Skokloster, Sweden. Copenhagen, Denmark:  Nordic Council of Ministers.

Nixon, S. W. (1987) Chesapeake Bay nutrient budgets - a reassessment. Biogeochemistry 4: 77-90.

Nixon, S. W. (1988) Physical energy inputs and the comparative ecology of lake and marine ecosystems.  Limnol.
        Oceanogr. 33: 1005-1025.

Nixon, S. W.; Pilson, M. E. Q. (1983) Nitrogen in estuarine and coastal marine ecosystems, hi: Carpenter,
        E. J.; Capone, D. G., eds. Nitrogen in the marine environment. New York, NY: Academic Press;
        pp. 565-648.

 Nixon, S.  W.; Pilson, M. E. Q.;  Oviatt, C.  A.; Donaghay, P.; Sullivan, B.; Seitzinger, S.;  Rudnick, D.;
        Frithsen, J. (1984) Eutrophication of a coastal marine ecosystem - an experimental study using the MERL
        microcosms. In: Fasham,  M. J. R., ed. Flows of energy and materials in marine ecosystems: theory and
        practice. New York, NY: Plenum Press; pp. 105-135.  (NATO conference series. IV. Marine sciences,
        v. 13).
   August 1991
10-269
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Nixon, S. W.; Hunt, C. D.; Nowicki, B. L. (1986) The retention of nutrients (C, N, P), heavy metals (Mn, Cd,
        Pb, Cu), and petroleum hydrocarbons in Narragansett Bay! In: Lasserre, P.; Martin, J. M., eds.
        Biogeochemical processes at the land-sea boundary. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science
        Publishers; pp. 99-122.

 Noll, K. E.; Fang, K. Y. P. (1989) Development of a dry deposition model for atmospheric coarse particles.
        Atmos. Environ. 23: 585-594.

 Nommik, H.;  Moller, G. (1981) Nitrogen recovery in soil and needle biomass after fertilization of a Scots pine
        stand,  and growth response obtained. Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences;
        Studia Fores. Sue. Nr 159.

 Norby, R. J.;  Weerasuriya, Y.; Hanson, P.  J. (1989) Induction of nitrate reductase activity  in red spruce needles
        by NO2 and HNO3 vapor. Can. J. For. Res. 19:  889-896.

 Novick, N. J.; Klein, T. M.; Alexander, M. (1984) Effect of simulated acid precipitation on nitrogen
        mineralization and nitrification in forest soils.  Water Air Soil Pollut. 23: 317-330.

 O'Dell, R.  A.; Taheri, M.; Kabel, R. L.  (1977) A model for uptake of pollutants by vegetation. J.  Air Pollut.
        Control Assoc. 27:  1104-1109.

 Odum, E. P. (1971) Fundamentals of ecology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders Company; pp. 1-38,
        106-136.

 Odum, E. P. (1989) Ecology and our endangered life-support systems. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates,
        Inc.; pp. 58-66, 108-118.

 Officer, C.  B.; Ryther, J. H. (1980) The possible importance of silicon in marine eutrophication. Mar. Ecol.
        Prog. Ser. 3: 83-91.

 Officer, C.  B.; Biggs, R. B.; Taft, J. L.;  Cronin, L. E.; Tyler, M. A.; Boynton, W. R. (1984) Chesapeake Bay
        anoxia: origin, development, and significance.  Science (Washington, DC) 223: 22-27.

 Ogner, O. (1972) The composition of a forest raw humus after fertilization with urea. Soil Sci.  113: 440-447.

 Okano,  K.; Totsuka, T. (1986) Absorption of nitrogen dioxide by sunflower plants grown at various levels of
       nitrate. New Phytol. 102: 551-562.

 Okano,  K.; Fukuzawa, T.; Tazaki, T.; Totsuka, T. (1986)  15N dilution method for estimating the absorption of
       atmospheric NO2 by plants. New Phytol. 102:  73-84.         '

 Okano,  K.; Machida, T.; Totsuka, T. (1988) Absorption of atmospheric NO2 by several herbaceous  species:
       estimation by the 1SN dilution method. New Phytol. 109: 203-210.

 Olsen, A. R. (1989) 1986 Wet deposition temporal and spatial patterns in North America. Richland, WA: U. S.
       Department of Energy, Pacific Northwest Laboratory; report no. PNL-6933. Available from: NTIS,
       Springfield, VA; DE89-014372.

Olson, R. K.; Reiners, W. A. (1983) Nitrification in subalpine balsam fir soils: tests for inhibitory factors. Soil
       Biol. Biochem.  15: 413-418.

Olson, R. K.; Reiners, W. A.; Lovett, G. M. (1985) Trajectory analysis of forest canopy effects on chemical
       flux in throughfall. Biogeochemistry  1: 361-373.
 August 1991
10-270      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Overrent, L. ,N. (1969) Lysimeter studies on tracer nitrogen in forest soil: 2. comparative losses of nitrogen
       through leaching and volatilization after the addition of urea-, ammonium- and nitrate-N15. Soil Sci.
       107: 149-159.                                                                   ;

Oviatt, C. A.; Keller, A. A.; Sampou, P. A.; Beatty, L. L. (1986) Patterns of productivity during
       eutrophication: a mesocosm experiment.,Mar, Ecol. Prog. Ser. 28: 69-80.                        ,

Oviatt, C.; Lane,  P.; French, F., Ill; Donaghay, P. (1989) Phytoplankton species and abundance in response to
       eutrophication in coastal marine mesocosms. J. Plankton Res. 11: 1223-1244.            ,         •

Owens, L.  B.; Edwards, W. M.; Van Keuren, R. W. (1989) Sediment and nutrient losses from an unimproved,
       all-year grazed watershed. J. Environ. Qual.  18: 232-238.

Pace, M. L. (1984) Zooplankton community structure, but not biomass,  influences the phosphorus-chlorophyll a
       relationship. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41: 1089-1096.

Paerl, H. W. (1985) Enhancement of marine primary production by nitrogen-enriched acid rain. Nature (London)
       315: 747-749.

Paerl, H. W. (1988) Nuisance phytoplankton blooms in coastal, estuarine, and inland waters. Limnol. Oceanogr.
       33: 823-847.

Paerl, H. W.; Prufert, L. E. (1987) Oxygen-poor microzones as potential sites of microbial N2 fixation in
       nitrogen-depleted aerobic marine waters. Appl. Environ.  Microbiol. 53:  1078-1087.

Paerl, H. W.; Crocker, K.  M.; Prufert, L. E. (1987)' Limitation of N2 fixation in coastal marine waters: relative
       importance of molybdenum, iron, phosphorus, and organic matter availability. Limnol. Oceanogr.
       32:, 525-536.                . ;

Paerl, H. W.; Rudek, J.; Mallin, M. A. (1990) Stimulation of phytoplankton production in coastal waters by
       natural rainfall inputs: nutritional and trophic implications. Mar. Biol. 107: 247-254.

Parker, G. G. (1983) Throughfall and stemflow in the forest nutrient cycle. In: Macfadyen, A.; Ford, E. D.,
       eds. Advances in ecological research, v. 13; pp. 57-120.                 ,

Parton, W. J.; Morgan, J.  A.; Altenhofen, J. M.; Harper, L.  A. (1988} Ammonia volatilization from spring
       wheat plants.  Agron. J. 80: 419-425.

Pastor, J.; Bockheim, J. G. (1984) Distribution and cycling of nutrients in an aspen-mixed-hardwood-Spodosol
        ecosystem in northern Wisconsin. Ecology 65: 339-353.                .            •  . .   .

Patrick, W. H., Jr.; Delaune, R. D. (.1976) Nitrogen and phosphorus utilization  by Spartina alterniflora in a salt
        marsh in Barataria  Bay, Louisiana. Estuarine Coastal Mar. Sci. 4: 59-64.    .

 Payne, W.J. (1981) Denitrification. New York, NY: Wiley Interscience.        .   •  ..                .

 Peake, E.; Davidson, C. I. (1990) Wet and dry deposition of air pollutants in Alberta. In: Legge, A. H.; Krupa,
        S. V., eds. Acidic  deposition: sulphur and nitrogen oxides. Boca Raton,  FL: Lewis Publishers,  Inc.;
        pp. 381-412.                     .-  .  : .

 Pedrazzini, F. R.;  Moore,  P. A. (1983) N2O emission and changings of redox potential and pH in submerged
        soil samples. Z. Pflanzenernaehr. Bodenkd.  146:  660-665.
  August 1991
. 10-271
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Petenohn, W. T.; Correll, D- L. (1984) Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observations on the role
        of a riparian forest. Ecology 65: 1466-1475.

 Peterjohn, W. T.; Schlesinger, W. H. (1990) Nitrogen loss from deserts in the sourthwestern United States.
        Biogeochemistry 10: 67-79.

 Peters, R. H. (1986) The role of prediction in limnology. Limnol. Oceatoogr. 31: 1143-1159.

 Peters, N. E.; Murdoch, P. S.  (1985) Hydrogeologic comparison of an acidic-lake basin with a neutral-lake basin
        in the west-central Adirondack fountains, New York. Water Air Soil Pollut. 26: 387-402.

 Phillips, R. A.; Stewart, K. M. (1990) Longitudinal and seasonal water chemistry variations in a northern
        Appalachian stream. Water Resour. Bull. 26: 489-498.

 Pietrafesa, L. J.; Janowitz, G. S.; Miller, J. M.; Noble, E. B.; Ross, S. W.; Epperly, S. P. (1986) Abiotic
        factors influencing the spatial and temporal variability of juvenile fish in  Pamlico Sound, North Carolina.
        In: Wolfe, D. A., ed. Estuarine variability: proceedings of the eighth biennial international estuarine
        research conference; July-August 1985; Durham, NH. Orlando, PL:  Academic Press, Inc.; pp. 341-353.

 Ponnamperuma, F. N. (1972) The chemistry of submerged soils. Adv.  Agron. 24: 29-96.

 Porter, L. K.; Viets, F. G., Jr.; Hutchinson, G. L. (1972) Air containing nitrOgen-15 ammonia: foliar absorption
        by corn seedlings. Science (Washington, DC) 175: 759-761.

 Post, W.  M.; Pastor, J.; Zinke, P. J.; Stangenberger, A. G. (1985) Global patterns of soil nitrogen storage.
        Nature (London) 317: 613-616.

 Potts, M.; Whitton,  B. A. (1977) Nitrogen fixation by blue-green algal 'communities in the intertidal zone of the
        lagoon of Aldabra Atoll. Oecologia 27: 275-283.

 Prairie, Y. T.; Duarte, C. M.; Kalff, J.  (1989) Unifying nutrient-chlorophyll relationships in lakes. Can.  J. Fish.
        Aquat. Sci. 46:  1176-1182.
                                                                   t      * *
 Prakasam, T. B. S.;  Krup, M. (1982) Denitrification. J. Water Pollut.  Control Fed. 54: 623-631.

 Prather, R. J.; Miyamoto, S. (1974) Nitric oxide sorption by calcareous soils: UJ. effects of temperature and lack
        of oxygen on capacity and rate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 38: 582-585.

 Prather, R. J.; Miyamoto, S.; Bohn, H.  L. (1973) Sorption of nitrogen dioxide by calcareous soils. Soil.  Sci.
        Soc. Am. Proc.  37; 860-863.

 Pratt, D. M. (1965) The winter-spring diatom flowering in Narragansett Bay. Limnol. Oceanogr.  10: 173-184.

 Press, M. C.; Lee, J. A. (1982) Nitrate reductase activity of Sphagnum species in the South Pennines.  New
        Phytol. 92: 487-494.               ,                                  .

Press, M. C.; Woodin, S. J.; Lee, J.  A.  (1986) The potential importance of an increased atmospheric nitrogen
        supply to  the growth of ombrotrophic Sphagnum species. New Phytol. ,103: 45-55.

Price, K. S.; Flemer, D. A.; Taft, J.  L.; Mackiernan, G. B.; Nehlsen,  W.; Biggs, R. B.; Burger, N. H.;
        Blaylock,  D.  A. (1985)  Nutrient  enrichment of Chesapeake Bay and its impact on the habitat of striped
        bass: a speculative hypothesis. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 114:  97-106.      .
 August 1991
10-272       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Pritchett, W. L.; Comerford, N. B. (1982) Long-tenn response to phosphorus fertilization on selected
       southeastern coastal plain soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46: 640-644.

Purchase, B. S. (1974) Evaluation of the claim that grass root exudates inhibit nitrification.. Plant .Spil'4'1:
       527-539.

Quails, R. G. (1984) The role of leaf litter nitrogen immobilization in the nitrogen budget of a swamp stream.
       J. Environ. Qual. 13: 640-644.

Raison, R. J.; Khanna, P. K.; Connell, M. J.; Falkiner, R. A.  (1990) Effects of water availability and
       fertilization on nitrogen cycling in a stand of Pinus radiata. For.' Ecol. Manage. 30:  31-43.

Rascher, C.  M.; Driscoll, C. T.; Peters, N. E. (1987) Concentration and flux of solutes from snow and forest
       floor during snowmelt in the most central  Adirondack region of New York. Biogeochemistry.3: 209-224.

Raven, J. A. (1985) Regulation of pH and generation of osmolarity in vascular plants: a cost-benefit analysis in
       relation to efficiency of use of energy, nitrogen and water. New Phytol, 101: 25-77.;  .

Reddy, K. R.; Patrick, W. H. (1984) Nitrogen transformations and loss in flooded soils and sediments. Crit.
       Rev. Environ. Control 13: 273-309.

Redfield, A. C. (1934) On the proportions of organic derivatives in sea Water and their relation to the
       composition of plankton. In: James Johnstone memorial volume. Liverpool, United Kingdom: Liverpool
       University Press; pp. 176-192.

Redfield, A. C. (1958) The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. Am. Sci. 46: 205-221.

Reed, P. B., Jr. (1988) National list of plant species that  occur in wetlands: 1988 North Carolina. St. Petersburg,
       FL: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory; report no. NERC-88/18:33.

Rehfuess, K. E. (1987) Perceptions on forest diseases in central Europe. Forestry 60: 1-11.

Reuss, J. O. (1983) Implications of the calcium-aluminum exchange system for -the effect of  acid precipitation on
        soils. J. Environ. Qual.  12: 591-595,

Reuss, J. O.; Johnson, D. W. (1986) Acid deposition and the acidification of soils and waters. New York, NY:
        Springer-Verlag. (Billings, W. D.; Golley, F.; Lange,  O. L.; Olson, J. S.; Remmert, H., eds. Ecological
        studies: analysis  and synthesis: v. 59). '

Reynolds, C. S. (1984) The ecology of freshwater phytoplankton. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge
        University Press.          .                  '

Rhee, G.-Y. (1978) Effects of N:P atomic ratios and nitrate limitation on algal growth, cell  composition, and
        nitrate uptake. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23: 10-25.

Rice, E. L.; Pancholy, S. K. (1972) Inhibition of nitrification by climax ecosystems. Am. J. Bot. 59: 1033-1040.

Richter, D. D.; Johnson, D. W.; Todd, D. E. (1983) Atmospheric sulfur deposition, neutralization, and ion
        leaching in two deciduous forest ecosystems. J. Environ. Qual.  12: 263-270.

Riggan, P.  J.; Lockwood,  R.  N.; Lopez, E. N. (1985) Deposition  and processing of airborne nitrogen pollutants
        in Mediterranean-type ecosystems of southern California. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19: 781-789.
  August 1991
10-273
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Riha, S. ,T.; Campbell, G. S.; Wolfe, J. (1986) A model of competition for ammonium among heterotrophs,
        nitrifiers, and roots. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:  1463-1466.          •  • •   .

 Ro, C.  U.; Tang, A. J. S.; Chan, W. H.j Kirk, R. W.; Reid, N. W.; Lusis, M. A. (1988) Wet and dry
        deposition of sulfur and nitrogen compounds in Ontario.  Atmos.  Environ. 22: 2763-2772.         ;•

 Robertson, G. P.; Rosswall, T. (1986) Nitrogen in West Africa:  the regional cycle. Ecol. Monogr. 56: 43-72.

 Robertson, G. P.; Vitousek, P. M. (1981) Nitrification potentials in primary1 and secondary succession. Ecology
        62: 376-386.

 Robinson, J. B.; Whiteley, H. R.; Stammers, W.; Kaushik, N. K.; Sain, P. (1979) The fate of nitrate in small
        streams and its management implications. In: Loehr, R. C.; Haith,  D. A.; Walter, M. F.; Martin, C. S.,
        eds. Best management practices for agriculture  and silviculture: proceedings of the 1978 Cornell
        agricultural waste management conference. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc.;
        pp. 247-259.

 Roelofs, J. G. M. (1983) Impact of acidification and eutrophication on macrophyte communities in soft waters in
        The Netherlands: I. field observations. Aquat. Bot.  17: 139-155.

 Roelofs, J. G. M. (1986) The effect of airborne sulphur and nitrogen deposition on aquatic and terrestrial
        heathland vegetation. Experientia 42: 372-377.

 Roelofs, J. G. M.; Schuurkes, J. A. A. R.;  Smits, A. J. M. (1984) Impact of acidification and eutrophication on
        macrophyte communities in soft waters. II. Experimental  studies. Aquat. Bot.  18: 389-411.

 Roelofs, J. G. M.; Kempers, A. J.; Houdijk, A. L. F.  M.; Jansen, J. (1985) The effect of air-borne ammonium
        sulphate on Pinus nigra var. maritima in the Netherlands. Plant Soil 84: 45-56.

 Roelofs, J. G. M.; Boxman, A. W.; van Dijk, H. F. G. (1987) Effects of airborne ammonium on natural
        vegetation and forests. In: Asman, W. A. H.; Diederen, H. S. M. A., eds. Ammonia and acidification:
        proceedings [of a] symposium of the European  Association for the Science of Air Pollution (EURASAP);
        April;  Bilthoven, The Netherlands. European Association for the Science of Air Pollution; pp. 266-276.

 Rogers, H. H.; Aneja,  V. P. (1980) Uptake of atmospheric ammonia by  selected plant species. Environ. Exp.
        Bot. 20: 251-257.                                                              ,

 Rogers, H. H.; Jeffries, H. E.; Stahel, E. P.; Heck, W. W.; Ripperton,  L. A.; Witherspoon, A.  M. (1977)
        Measuring air pollutant uptake by plants: a direct kinetic  technique. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc.
        27: 1192-1197.

 Rogers, H. H.; Campbell, J. C.; Volk, R. J. (1979a) Nitrogen-15 dioxide uptake and  incorporation by Phaseolus
        vulgaris (L.). Science (Washington,  DC) 206: 333-335.

Rogers, H. H.; Jeffries, H. E.; Witherspoon, A. M. (1979b) Measuring air pollutant uptake by plants: nitrogen
        dioxide. J.  Environ. Qual. 8: 551-557.

Roseberg, R. J.; Christensen, N. W.; Jackson^ T. L. (1986) Chloride, soil solution osmotic potential, and soil
       pH effects on nitrification. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am.  J. 50:  941-945.

Rosen, K. (1982) Supply, loss and distribution of nutrients in three coniferous forest watersheds in central
       Sweden. Umea, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural  Sciences, Department of Forest Soils; report
       no. 41.
 August 1991
10-274      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Rosen, K. (1988) Effects of biomass accumulation and forestry on nitrogen in forest ecosystems. In: Nilsson, J.;
       ' Grennfelt, P., eds. Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen: report from a workshop; March; Skokloster,
        Sweden. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers; pp. 269-293.

 Rosenberg, R.; Elmgren, R.; Fleischer, S.; Jonsson, P.; Persson, G.; Dahlin, H. (1990) Marine eutrophication
        case studies in Sweden. Ambio 19:  102-108.

 Rosswall, T. (1981) The biogeochemical nitrogen cycle. In:  Likens, G. E., ed. Some perspectives of the major
,,,,,/  .. .biogeochemical cycles. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; pp. 25-49.     ,

 Rotty, R. M. (1983) Distribution of and changes in industrial carbon dioxide production. J. Geophys. Res.
  •;.   ' C: Oceans  Atmos. 88: 1301-1308.                                <

 Rowland, A.;  Murray,  A.  J.  S.;.Wellborn, A. R. (1985) Oxides of nitrogen and their impact upon vegetation.
        Rev. Environ. Health 5: 295-342.                           !

 Rowland-Bamford, A. J.; Drew, M. C. (1988) The influence of plant nitrogen status on NO2 uptake, NO2
        .assimilation and on the gas exchange characteristics  of barley plants exposed to atmospheric NO2.  J. Exp.
        Bot. 39: 1287-1297.

 Royal Society., (1983) The nitrogen cycle of the United Kingdom, London, United Kingdom: The Royal Society;
        pp. 45-46.

 Roze, F. (1988) Nitrogen cycle in Brittany heathland. Acta  Oecol. Oecol. Plant. 9: 371-379.

 Rudd, J. W. M.; Kelly, C. A.; Schindler, D.  W.; Turner, M. A. (1988) Disruption of the nitrogen cycle in
         acidified lakes. Science (Washington, DC) 240: 1515-1517.

  Rudd, J. W. M.; Kelly, C. A.; Schindler, D.  W.; Turner, M. A. (1990) A comparison of the acidification
         efficiencies of nitric  and sulfuric acids by two whole-lake addition experiments. Limnol.  Oceanogr.
         35: 663-679.

  Rudolph, H.;  Voigt, J. U. (1986) Effects of NH4+-N and NO3'-N on growth and metabolism of Sphagnum
         magellanicum. Physiol. Plant. 66: 339-343.

  Rydberg, L.;  Edler, L.; Floderus,  S.; Graneli, W. (1990) Interaction between supply of nutrients, primary
          production, sedimentation and oxygen consumption in SE Kattegat. Ambio 19: 134-141.

  Ryther,  J. H.; Dunstan, W.  M. (1971) Nitrogen, phosphorus, and eutrophication in the coastal marine
          environment. Science (Washington, DC) 171: 1008-1013.

  Sabey, B. R.;, Frederick,  L. R.; Bartholomew,, W. V. (1959) The formation of nitrate from ammonium nitrogen
          in soils: III. influence of temperature and initial population of nitrifying organisms on the maximum rate
          and delay period. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.  23: 462-465.

  Sanville, W.  (1988) Response of an Alaskan wetland to nutrient enrichment. Aquat. Bot. 30: 231-243.

  Savant, N, K.; De Datta, S. K. (1982) Nitrogen transformations in wetland rice soils. Adv. Agron. 35: 241-302.

  Saxe, H. (1986) Stomatal-dependent and stomatal-independent uptake of NOX. New Phytol. 103:  199-205.

  Schaefer, D.  A.;  Driscoll, C. T. (n.d.) Identifying sources of snowmelt acidification with a watershed mixing
          model. Water Air Soil Pollut: in press.
    August  1991
10-275      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Schaefer, D. A.; Driscoll, C. T., Jr.; Van Dreason, R.; Yatsko, C. P. (1990) The episodic acidification of
         Adirondack lakes during snowmelt. Water Resour. Res. 26: 1639-1647.

 Schiff, S. L.; Anderson, R. F. (1987) Limnocorral studies of chemical and biological acid neutralization in two
         freshwater lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44(suppl. 1): 173-187.

 Schimel, D. S.; Simkins, S.; Rosswall,  T.; Mosier, A. R.; Parton, W. J. (1988) Scale and the measurement of
         nitrogen-gas fluxes from terrestrial ecosystems. In: Rosswall, T.; Woodmansee, R. G.; Risser, .P.. G.,
         eds. Scales and global change. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; pp. 179-193.           "'"

 Schindler, D. W.  (1976) Biogeochemical evolution of phosphorus limitation in nutrient-enriched lakes of the
         Precambrian Shield. In:  Nriagu, J. O., ed. Environmental biogeochemistry: v. 2, metals transfer and
         ecological mass balances. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc.; pp. 647-664.

 Schindler, D. W.  (1977) Evolution of phosphorus limitation in lakes. Science (Washington, DC) 195: 260-262.

 Schindler, D. W.  (1978) Factors regulating phytoplankton production and standing crop in the world's
        freshwaters. Limnol. Oceanogr.  23: 478-486.

 Schindler, D. W.  (1987) Detecting ecosystem responses to anthropogenic stress. Can. J. Fish. Aquat  Sci
        44(suppl.  1): 6-25.

 Schindler, D. W.; Paerl, H. W.; Keller.sP. E.; Lean, D.  R. S. (1980) Environmental contraints onAnabaena N2
        and CO2 fixation: effects of hyperoxia and phosphate depletion on blooms and chemostat cultures. In:
        Hypereutrophic ecosystems: v. 2. The Hague: Junk; pp. 221-229.

 Schindler, D. W.; Turner,  M. A.; Hesslein, R. H. (1985) Acidification and alkalization of lakes by experimental
        addition of nitrogen compounds. Biogeochemistry 1: 117-133.

 Schindler, D. W.; Beaty, K. G.; Fee, E. J.; Cruikshank, D. R.; DeBruyn, E. R.; Findlay, D. L.; Linsey,
        G. A.; Shearer, J. A.; Stainton,  M. P.; Turner, M. A. (1990) Effects of climatic  warming on lakes of
        the central boreal forest.  Science (Washington, DC) 250: 967-970.

 Schnoor, J.  L.; Palmer, W. D., Jr.; Glass, G. E.  (1984) Modeling impacts of acid precipitation for northeastern
        Minnesota. In: Schnoor,  J. L., ed. Modeling of total acid precipitation impacts. Boston, MA:
        Butterworth Publishers; pp.  155-173. (Teasley, J.  L, ed. Acid precipitation series: v.  9).

 Schofield, C. L.; Galloway, J. N.; Hendry, G. R. (1985)  Surface water chemistry in the ILWAS basins. Water
        Air Soil Pollut. 26: 403-423.

 Schulze, E.-D. (1989) Air pollution and  forest decline in a spruce (ficea abies) forest. Science (Washington,
        DC) 244: 776-783.

 Schulze, E.-D.; de Vries, W.; Hauhs, M.; Rosen, K.; Rasmussen, L.; Tamm, C.-O.; Nilsson, J. (1989) Critical
        loads for nitrogen deposition on forest ecosystems. Water Air Soil Pollut. 48:  451-456.

 Schuurkes, J. A. A. R. (1986) Atmospheric ammonium sulphate deposition and its role in the acidification and
       nitrogen enrichment of poorly buffered aquatic systems. Experientia 42: 351-357.

Schuurkes, J. A. A. R. (1987) Acidification of surface waters by atmospheric deposition [Ph.D. thesis],
       Nijmegen,  The Netherlands: Catholic University.

Schuurkes, J. A. A. R.; Kok, C.  J.; den Hartog, C. (1986) Ammonium and nitrate uptake by aquatic plants from
       poorly buffered and acidified waters. Aquat. Bot. 24: 131-146.
 August 1991
10-276       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Schuurkes, J. A. A. R.; Elbers, M. A.; Gudden, J. J. F.; Roelofs, J. G. M. (1987) Effects of simulated
       ammonium sulphate and sulphuric acid rain on acidification, water quality and flora of small-scale soft
       water systems. Aquat. Bot. 28: 199-226.

Schwartz, S. E. (1989) Acid deposition: unraveling a regional phenomenon. Science (Washington, DC)
       243: 753-763.

Sehmel, G. A. (1980) Particle and gas dry deposition: a review. Atmos. Environ. 14: 983-1011.

Seitzinger, S. P. (1987) Nitrogen biogeochemistry in an unpolluted estuary: the importance of benthis
       denitrification. Mar. Ecol.: Prog. Ser. 37: 65-73.

Seitzinger, S. P. (1988a) Denitrification in freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems: ecological and geochemical
       significance. Limnol. Oceanogr.  33: 702-724.

Seitzinger, S. P. (1988b) Benthic nutrient cycling and oxygen consumption in the Delaware estuary. In:
       Majumdar, S. K.; Miller, E. W.; Sage, L. E., eds. Ecology and restoration of the Delaware River Basin.
       Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania Academy of Science; pp. 132-147.

Seitzinger, S. P.; Pilson, M. E. Q.; Nixon, S. W. (1983) Nitrous oxide production in nearshore marine
       sediments. Science (Washington, DC) 222: 1244-1246.

Seitzinger, S. P.; Nixon, S. W.; Pilson, M. E. Q. (1984) Denitrification and nitrous oxide production in a
       coastal marine ecosystem.  Limnol. Oceanogr. 29: 73-83.

Servos, M.  R.; Mackie, G. L. (1986) The effect of short-term acidification during spring snowmelt on selected
       Mollusca in south-central Ontario. Can.  J.  Zool.  64: 1690-1695.

Setaro, F. V.; Melack, J. M. (1984) Responses  of phytoplankton to experimental nutrient enrichment in an
        Amazon floodplain lake. Limnol. Oceanogr.  29: 972-984.

 Shaffer,  P.  W.; Galloway,  J. N.  (1982) Acid precipitation: the impact on two headwater streams in Shenandoah
       'National Park, Virginia. In: Herrmann,  R.; Jounson,  A. L,  eds. International symposium on
        hydrometeorology. Denver, CO: American Water Resources Association; pp. 473-483.

 Shaffer,  G.; Ronner, U. (1984) Denitrification in the Baltic proper deep water. Deep Sea Res. 31: 197-220,

 Sharpe,  W. E.; DeWalle, D. R.; Leibfried, R. T.; Dinicola,  R. S.; Kimmel, W. G.; Sherwin, L. S. (1984)
         Causes of acidification of four streams on Laurel Hill in southwestern Pennsylvania. J. Environ. Qual.
         13: 619-631.

 Sharpe,  W. E.; Leibfried, V. G.; Kimmel, W. G.; DeWalle, D. R. (1987) The relationship of water quality and
         fish occurrence to soils and geology in an area of high hydrogen and sulfate ion deposition. Water
         Resour. Bull. 23:  37-46.

 Sharpe,  W. E.; DeWalle,  D. R.;  Swistock, B. R.  (1989) On defining acidification status of unglaciated
         headwater Appalachian streams. In: Headwaters hydrology.  Denver, CO: American Water Resources
         Association; pp. 517-525.

 Sheppard, L. J.; Smith, R. I.; Cannell, M. G. R. (1989) Frost hardiness of Picea rubens growing in spruce
         decline regions of the Appalachians. Tree Physiol. 5: 25-37.
   August  1991
10-277      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Shigo, A. L. (1973) Insect and disease control: forest fertilization relations. In: Leaf, A. L.; Leonard, R. E.,
        eds. Forest fertilization: symposium proceedings; August 1972; Warrensburg, NY. Upper Darby, PA:
        U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service; pp. 117-121; USDA Forest Service general technical
        report NE-3. Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA;  PB-271094.

 Shortle, W. C.; Smith, K. T. (1988) Aluminum-induced calcium deficiency syndrome in declining red spruce.
        Science (Washington, DC) 240: 1017-1018.

 Silsbee, D. G.;  Larson, G. L. (1982) Water quality of streams in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.
        Hydrobiologia 89: 97-115.


 Simpson, J. C.; Olsen, A. R. (1990) Wet deposition temporal  and spatial patterns in North America,  1987.
        Research Triangle Park, NC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Atmospheric Research and
        Exposure Assessment Laboratory; EPA report no. EPA-600/4-90-019. Available from NTIS, Springfield
        VA; PB90-251836.


 Sinclair, T. R.;  van Houtte, R. F.  (1982) Simulative analysis of ammonia exchange between the atmosphere and
        plant communities. Agric. Environ. 7:  237-242.

 Singh, H. B. (1987) Reactive nitrogen in the troposphere: chemistry and transport of NO and PAN. Environ
        Sci. Technol. 21: 320-327.


 Singh, J. S.; Lauenroth, W.  K.; Hunt, H. W.;  Swift, D. M. (1984) Bias and random errors in estimators of net
        root production: a simulation approach. Ecology 65: 1760-1764.

 Sinn, J. P.; Pell, E. J.; Kabel, R. L. (1984) Uptake rate of nitrogen dioxide by potato plants. J. Air Pollut.
        Control Assoc. 34: 668-669.


 Sisterson, D. L.; Bowersox,  V. C.; Olsen, A. R.; Meyers, T.  P.; Vong, R. L.  (n.d.) Deposition monitoring:
        methods and results.  National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program; State of Science/Technology report
        no.  6; in press.


 Skarby, L.; Bengtson, C.; Bostrom, C.-A.;  Grennfelt, P.; Troeng, E. (1981) Uptake of NOX in Scots pine. Silva
        Perm. 15: 396-398.


 Skeffington, R. A.; Wilson,  E. J. (1988) Excess nitrogen deposition: issues for consideration. Environ Pollut
       54:  159-184.

 Smayda, T.  J. (1974) Bioassay of the growth potential of the surface water of lower Narragansett Bay over an
       annual cycle using the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana (oceanic clone,  13-1). Limnol Oceanogr
        19: 889-901.


 Smith, W. H. (1974) Air pollution-effects on the structure and function of the temperate forest ecosystem
       Environ. Pollut. 6: 111-129.


 Smith, R. L. (1980) Ecology and field biology.  3rd ed. New York,  NY: Harper & Row, Publishers; pp. 11-199.

Smith, V. H. (1982) The nitrogen and phosphorus dependence of algal biomass in lakes: an empirical and
       theoretical analysis. Limnol. Oceanogr.  27: 1101-1112.

Smith, S. V. (1984) Phosphorus versus nitrogen limitation in the marine environment. Limnol. Oceanogr
       29: 1149-1160.
 August 1991
10-278      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Smith, C. J.; DeLaune, R. D. (1983) Gaseous nitrogen losses from Gulf Coast marshes. Northeast Gulf Sci.
        6: 1-8.

Smith, C. J.; DeLaune, R. D. (1985) Recovery of added 15N-labelled ammonium-N from Louisiana Gulf Coast
        estuarine sediment. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 21: 225-233.

Smith, R. E. H.; Kalff, J. (1982) Size-dependent phosphorus uptake kinetics and cell quota in phytoplankton.
        J. Phycol. 18: 275-284.

Smith, V. H.; Shapiro, J. (1981) Chlorophyll-phosphorus relations in individual lakes. Their importance to lake
        restoration strategies. Environ.  Sci. Technol. 15: 444-451.

Smith, R. A.; Alexander, R. B.; Wolman, M. G. (1987a) Water-quality trends in the nation's.rivers. Science
      '  (Washington, DC) 235: 1607-1615.

 Smith,  R. A.; Alexander, R. B.; Wolman, M. G. (1987b) Analysis and interpretation of water quality trends in
      '  major U.S. rivers, 1974-1981.  U. S. Geol. Surv; Water-Supply Pap. 2307.

 Smullen, J. T.; Taft, J. L.;  Macknis, J. (1982) Nutrient and sediment loads to the tidal Chesapeake Bay system.
        In:  Chesapeake Bay Program technical studies: a synthesis. Annapolis, MD: U. S. Environmental
        Protection Agency;  pp. 150-251. Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB84-111202.

• Sollins, P.; Grier, C. C.; McCorison,  F. M.; Cromack, K., Jr.; Fogel, R.; Fredriksen, R. L. (1980) The
        internal element  cycles of an old-growth Douglas-fir ecosystem in western Oregon. Ecol. Monogr.
        50: 261-285.

 Sprent, J. I. (1987) The ecology of the nitrogen cycle. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University
        Press.

 Srivastava, H. S:; Jolliffe, P. A.; Runeckles, V. C. (1975) Inhibition of gas exchanged bean leaves by NO2.
         Can. J. Bot. 53: 466-474.

 Steen, E. (1984) Root and shoot growth of Atriplex litoralis in relation to nitrogen supply.  Oikos 42: 74-81.

 Stensland,  G. J.; Whelpdale, D. M.; Oehlert, G. (1986) Precipitation chemistry. In:  Acid deposition: long-term
         trends. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; pp. 128-199.

  Steudler, P. A.; Peterson, B. J. (1984) Contribution of gaseous sulphur from salt marshes to the global sulphur
         cycle. Nature (London) 311: 455-457.

  Stockner, J.  G.; Shortreed, K. S. (1988) Response ofAnabaena  and Synechococcus to manipulation of
         riitrogen:phosphorus ratios in  a lake fertilization experiment. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33: 1348-1361.

  Stoddard, J. L. (0000) Trends in Catskill stream water quality: evidence from historical data. Science
         (Washington, DC): Submitted.

  Stoddard,  J. L. (1987a) Alkalinity dynamics in an unacidified alpine lake, Sierra Nevada, California. Limnol.
         Oceanogr.  32: 825-839.               '

  Stoddard,  J. L. (1987b) Micronutrient and phosphorus limitation of phytoplankton abundance in Gem Lake,
         Sierra Nevada,  California. Hydrobiologia 154:  103-111.

  Stoddard, J. L.; Kellogg, J. H. (n.d.) Trends and patterns in lake acidification in the state of Vermont: evidence
          from the Long-Term Monitoring Project. Water Air Soil Pollut.: in  press.
    August  1991
10-279      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Stoddard, J. L.; Murdoch, P. S. (1991) Catskill Mountains: an overview of chronic and episodic acidity in dilute
        Catskill Mountain streams. In: Charles, D. F., ed. Acid deposition and aquatic ecosystems: regional case
        studies of acid deposition. Springer-Verlag.

 Stottlemyer, R.; Toczydlowski, D. (1990) Pattern of solute movement from snow into an upper Michigan stream.
        Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47:  290-300.

 Stream Solute Workshop. (1990) Concepts and methods for assessing solute dynamics in stream ecosystems.
        J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 9:  95-119.

 Stuanes, A. O. (1980) Effects of acid precipitation on soil and forest: 5. release and loss of nutrients from a
        Norwegian forest soil due to artificial rain of varying acidity. In: Drablos, D.; Tollan, A., eds.
        Ecological impact of acid precipitation: proceedings of an international conference; March; Sandefjord,
        Norway. Oslo, Norway: SNSF project; pp. 198-199.

 Sullivan, T. J.; Christophersen, N.; Muniz, I. P.; Seip, H. M.;  Sullivan, P. D. (1986) Aqueous aluminium
        chemistry response to episodic increases in discharge. Nature (London) 323: 324-327.

 Sullivan, T. J.; Eilers, J. M.; Church, M. R.; Blick, D. J.; Eshleman, K. N.; Landers, D. H.; DeHaan,  M. S.
        (1988) Atmospheric wet sulphate deposition and lakewater chemistry.  Nature (London) 331: 607-609.

 Sullivan, T. J.; Driscoll, C. T.; Gherini, S. A.; Munson, R. K.; Cook, R. B.; Charles, D. F.; Yatsko, C.  P.
        (1989) Influence of aqueous aluminium and organic acids on measurement of acid neutralizing capacity in
        surface waters. Nature (London) 338: 408-410.

 Summers, P. W.; Bowersox, V. C.; Stensland, G. J. (1986) The geographical distribution and temporal
       variations of acidic deposition in eastern North America. Water Air Soil Pollut. 31: 523-535.

 Sundaresan, B. B.; Harding,  C. I.; May, F. P.; Hendrickson, E. R. (1967) Adsorption of nitrogen oxides from
       waste gas.  Environ. Sci. Technol. 1: 151-156.

 Suttle, C. A.; Harrison, P.  J. (1988) Ammonium and phosphate  uptake rates,  N:P supply ratios,  and evidence for
       N and P limitation in some oligotrophic lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr.  33: 186-202.

 Swank, W. T.; Waide, J. B. (1988)  Characterization of baseline  precipitation and stream chemistry and nutrient
       budgets for control  watersheds. In: Swank, W. T.;  Crossley, D. A., Jr., eds. Forest hydrology and
       ecology at  Coweeta. New York, NY:  Springer-Verlag; pp. 57-79.  (Billings, W. D.; Golley, F.; Lange,
       O. L.; Olson, J. S.; Remmert, H., eds. Ecological studies: analysis and synthesis, v. 66).

 Swanson, R. L.; Parker, C. A. (1988) Physical environmental factors contributing to recurring hypoxia in the
       New York Bight. Trans. Am.  Fish. Soc. 117: 37-47.

 Swistock, B. R.; DeWalle,  D. R.; Sharpe, W. E. (1989) Sources of acidic storm flow in an Appalachian
       headwater stream. Water Resour. Res. 25: 2139-2147.

 Switzer, G. L.; Nelson, L.  E. (1972) Nutrient accumulation and  cycling in loblolly  pine (Pinus taeda L.)
       plantation ecosystems: the first twenty years. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36: 143-147.

Syrett, P. J. (1953) The assimilation of ammonia by nitrogen-starved cells  of Chlorella vulgaris: part I. the
       correlation of assimilation with respiration. Ann. Bot. 17: 1-19.

Tallis, J. H. (1964) Studies on southern Pennine peats: III.  the behaviour of Sphagnum. J. Ecol. 52: 345-353.
 August 1991
10-280       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Tans, P. P.; Fung, I. Y.; Takahashi, T. (1990) Observational constraints on the global atmospheric CO2 budget.
        Science (Washington, DC) 247: 1431-1438.                                           •

Tarrant, R. F.; Miller, R. E. (1963) Accumulation of organic matter and soil nitrogen beneath a plantation of red
        alder and Douglas-fir. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 27: 231-234.

Tate, R. L., III. (1979) Effect of flooding on microbial activities in organic soils: carbon metabolism. Soil Sci.
        128:267-273.

Taylor, G. E., Jr.; Hanson,  P. J.; Baldocchi, D. D. (1988) Pollutant deposition to individual leaves and plant
  •     "canopies: sites of regulation and relationship to injury. In:  Heck, W. W.; Taylor, O. C.; Tingey,  D. T.,
        eds. Assessment of crop loss from air pollutants. New York, NY: Elsevier Applied Science; pp. 227-257.

Taylor, B. R.; Parkinson, D.; Parsons, W. F. J. (1989) Nitrogen and lignin content as predictors of litter decay
        rates: a microcosm test. Ecology 70: 97-104.

Thomas, W. H. (1970) Effect of ammonium and nitrate concentration on chlorophyll increases in natural tropical
        Pacific phytoplankton populations. Limnol. Oceanogr. 15: 386-394.

Thornton, F.  C.; Schaedle, M.; Raynal, D. J. (1987) Effects of aluminum on red spruce seedlings in solution
        culture. Environ. Exp. Bot. 27: 489-498.

Tilman, D. (1987) Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen
        gradients. Ecol. Monogr. 57: 189-214.

Tiner, R. W., Jr. (1984) Wetlands of the United States: current status and recent trends. Washington, DG: U. S.
        Department of the Interior,  National Wetlands Inventory, Fish and Wildlife Service.

Tingey, D.-T. (1968)  Foliar absorption of nitrogen dioxide [Master's thesis]. Salt Lake  City, UT: University of
        Utah, Department of Botany.

 Tjepkema, J. D.; Cartica, R. J.; Hemond, H. F. (1981) Atmospheric concentration of ammonia  in Massachusetts
        and deposition on vegetation. Nature (London) 294:  445-446.

 Tomlinson, G. H., II. (1983) Air pollutants and forest decline.  Environ. Sci. Technol.  17: 246A-256A.

 Treshow, M. (1980) Pollution effects on plant distribution. Environ.  Conserv. 7: 279-286.

 Triska, F. J.; Kennedy, V.  C.; Avanzino, R. J.; Zellweger, G. W.; Bencala, K. E. (1990) In situ
        retention-transport response to nitrate loading and storm discharge in a third-order stream. J. N. Am.
        Benthol. Soc. 9: 229-239.

 Tschaplinski, T. J.; Johnson, D. W.; Norby, R. J.; Todd, D. E.  (n.d.) Optimum nitrogen in short rotation
        sycamore plantations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.: in press.

 Turner, J.  (1977) Effect of nitrogen availability on nitrogen cycling in  a Douglas-fir stand. For. Sci.
        23: 307-316.

 Turner, J.  (1981) Nutrient  cycling  in an age sequence of western Washington Douglas-fir stands. Ann. Bot.
        '48: 159-169.

 Turner, J.; Singer, M. J. (1976) Nutrient distribution and cycling in a  sub-alpine coniferous forest ecosystem.
        J. Appl. Ecol. 13:  295-301.
   August 1991
10-281       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Tyler, M. (1988) Contribution of atmospheric nitrate deposition to nitrate loading in the Chesapeake Bay.
        Annapolis, MD: Department of Natural Resources, Chesapeake Bay Research & Monitoring Division;
        report no. AD-88-7.

 Tyler, M. A.; Coats, D. W.; Anderson, D. M. (1982) Encystment in a dynamic environment: deposition of
        dinoflagellate cysts by a frontal convergence. Mar. Ecol. Prog.  Ser. 7: 163-178.

 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1982) Air quality criteria for oxides of nitrogen. Research Triangle
        Park, NC: Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Environmental Criteria and Assessment
        Office; EPA report no. EPA-600/8-82-026. Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB83-131011.

 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1985) Ambient water quality criteria for ammonia - 1984. Washington,
        DC: Criteria and Standards Division; EPA report no. EPA-440/5-85-001. Available from: NTIS,
        Springfield,  VA; PB85-227114.

 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1986) Air quality criteria for ozone and other photochemical oxidants
        [draft final]. Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of Health and  Environmental Assessment,
        Environmental Criteria  and Assessment Office; EPA report nos. EPA-600/8-84-020aF-ef. Available from-
        NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB87-142949.

 Ulrich, B. (1980) Production and consumption of hydrogen ions in the ecosphere. In: Hutchinson, T.  C.; Havas,
        M., eds.  Effects of acid precipitation on terrestrial ecosystems: proceedings of the NATO conference on
        effects of acid precipitation on vegetation and soils; May 1978; Toronto, ON, Canada. New York, NY:
        Plenum Press; pp. 255-282.

 Ulrich, B. (1983) Soil acidity and its relations to acid deposition. In: Ulrich, B.; Pankrath, J., eds. Effects of
        accumulation of air pollutants in forest ecosystems: proceedings of a workshop; May 1982; Goettingen,
        Federal Republic of Germany. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel  Publishing Company;
        pp. 127-146.

 Urban, N. R.; Eisenreich, S. J. (1988)  Nitrogen cycling in a forested Minnesota bog. Can. J. Bot. 66: 435-449.

 Valiela, I.; Teal,  J. M. (1974) Nutrient limitation in salt marsh vegetation. In:  Ecology of halophytes. New
        York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.; pp. 547-563.

 Valiela, L; Teal,  J. M. (1979) The nitrogen budget of a salt marsh ecosystem.  Nature (London) 280: 652-656.

 Valiela, L; Teal,  J. M.; Sass, W.  J. (1975) Production and dynamics of salt marsh vegetation and the  effects of
        experimental treatment with sewage sludge: biomass, production and species composition. J. Appl. Ecol
        12: 973-981.

 Valiela, I.; Teal,  J. M.; Persson, N. Y. (1976) Production and dynamics of experimentally enriched salt marsh
        vegetation: belowground biomass. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21: 245-252.

 Valiela, I.; Wilson, J.; Buchsbaum, R.; Rietsma,  C.; Bryant, D.; Foreman, K.; Teal, J. (1984) Importance of
        chemical composition of salt marsh litter on decay rates and feeding by detritivores. Bull. Mar. Sci
        35: 261-269.

van Aalst, R. M.  (1982) Dry deposition of NOX. In: Schneider, T.; Grant, L., eds. Air pollution by nitrogen
        oxides. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company; pp. 263-270.

van Aalst, R. M.; Diederen, H.  S. M. A. (1985) Removal and transformation processes in the atmosphere with
        respect to SO2 and NOX.  In: Zwerver, S.; van Ham, J., eds. Interregional air pollution modelling: the
        state of the art. New York, NY: Plenum Press; pp. 83-103.
 August 1991
10-282      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
van Breemen N.; van Dijk, H. F. G. (1988) Ecosystem effects of atmospheric deposition of nitrogen in The
       Netherlands. In: Dempster, J. P.; Manning, W. J.; Skeffington, R. A., eds. Excess nitrogen deposition:
       [papers from the workshop];  September 1987; Leatherhead, Surrey, United Kingdom. Environ.  Pollut.
       54: 249-274.

van Breemen, N.; Burrough, P.  A.; Velthorst, E. J.; van Dobben, H. F.; de Wit, T.; Ridder, T. B.; Reijnders,
       H. F. R. (1982) Soil acidification from atmospheric ammonium sulphate in forest canopy throughtall.
   .  .. Nature (London) 299: 548-550.                                             ,

van Breemen, N.; Mulder, J.; van Grinsven, J. J. M. (1987) Impacts of acid atmospheric deposition on
       woodland soils in the Netherlands:  H. nitrogen transformations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51: 1634-1640.

Van der Eerden, L. J. M. (1982) Toxicity  of ammonia to plants.  Agric. Environ.  7: 223-235.

Van der Molen, J.; Bussink, D. W.; Vertregt, N.; van Faassen, H. G.; den Boer, D. J.  (1989) Ammonia
       volatilization from arable and grassland soils. In: Hansen, J. Aa.; Henriksen, K., eds. Nitrogen in
       organic wastes applied to soils. New York, NY: Academic Press; pp. 185-201.

van der Valk, A. G.;  Attiwill, P.  M. (1983) Above- and below-ground litter decomposition in an Australian salt
        marsh. Aust. J. Ecol. 8: 441-447.

van Dijk, H. F. G.; Roelofs, J. G. M. (1988) Effects of excessive ammonium deposition on the nutritional status
        and condition of pine needles. Physiol. Plant. 73: 494-501.

 van Dijk, H. F. G.; de Louw, M. H. J.; Roelofs, J. G. M.; Verburgh, J. J. (1990) Impact of artificial,
        ammonium-enriched rainwater on soils and young coniferous trees in a greenhouse. Part II - Effects on
 .    -   the trees. Environ. Pollut. 63: 41-59.

 van Hove, L. W.  A.; Koops, A. J.; Adema, E. H.; Vredenberg, W. J.; Pieters, G. A. (1987). Analysis of the
        uptake of atmospheric ammonia by leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Atmos. Environ. 21: 1759-1763.

 van Hove, L. W. A.; Adema, E. H.; Vredenberg, W.  J.; Pieters, G. A. (1989a) A study of the adsorption of
        NH3 and SO2 on leaf surfaces.  Atmos. Environ. 23: 1479-1486.

 van Hove, L. W. A.; van Kooten, O.; Adema, E. H.; Vredenberg, W. J.; Pieters, G. A. (1989b) Physiological
        effects of long-term exposure to low and moderate  concentrations of atmospheric NH3 on poplar leaves.
        Plant Cell Environ. 12: 899-908.

 van Hove, L. W. A.; Vredenberg, W. J.; Adema, E. H. (1990) The effect of wind velocity, air temperature and
        humidity on NH3 and SO2 transfer into bean leaves (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Atmos. Environ. Part A
        24: 1263-1270.
                   *
  Van Miegroet, H.; Cole, D. W.  (1984) The impact of nitrification on soil acidification and cation leaching in red
         alder ecosystem. J. Environ. Qual. 13: 586-590.

  Van Miegroet, H.; Cole, D. W.  (1985) Acidification sources in red alder and Douglas  fir soils - importance of
         nitrification. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49: 1274-1279.

  Van Miegroet, H.; Cole, D. W.; Homann, P. S. (1989) The effects of alder forest cover and alder forest
         conversion on site fertility  and productivity. In: Gessel, S.  P.; Lacate, D. S.; Weetman, G. F.; Powers,
         R. F., eds. Sustained productivity of forest soils: proceedings of the 7th North American forest soils
         conference; July 1988; Vancouver, BC, Canada. Vancouver, BC, Canada: University of British
          Columbia; pp. 333-354.
    August 1991
10-283      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 van Miegroet, H.; Cole, D. W.; Foster, N. W. (1991) Nitrogen distribution and cycling. In: Johnson, D. W.;
        Lindberg, S. E., eds. Atmospheric deposition and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems. New York, NY:
        Springer-Verlag; in press.

 Verhoeven, J. T. A.; Arts, H. H. M. (1987) Nutrient dynamics in small mesotrophic fens surrounded by
        cultivated land: II. N and P accumulation in plant biomass in relation to the release of inorganic N and P
        in the peat soil. Oecologia 72: 557-561.

 Verhoeven, J. T. A.; Koerselman, W.; Beltman, B. (1988) The vegetation of fens in relation to their hydrology
        and nutrient dynamics: a case study. In: Symoens, J. J., ed.  Vegetation of inland waters. Dordrecht, The
        Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; pp. 249-282.  (Lieth, H., ed. Handbook of vegetation science-
        v. 15/1).

 Vermeer, J. G. (1986) The effect of nutrients on shoot biomass and species composition of wetland and hayfield
        communities. Acta Oecol. Oecol. Plant. 7: 31-41.

 Vermeer, J. G.; Berendse,  F. (1983) The relationship between nutrient availability, shoot biomass and species
        richness in grassland and wetland communities. Vegetatio 53: 121-126.

 Verry, E. S.; Timmons, D. R. (1982) Waterborne nutrient flow through an upland-peatland watershed in
        Minnesota. Ecology 63: 1456-1467.

 Vince, S.; Valiela,  I. (1973) The effects of ammonium and phosphate enrichments on chlorophyll a, pigment
        ratio and species composition of phytoplankton of Vineyard Sound. Mar. Biol. 19:  69-73.

 Vincent, W. F. (1981) Rapid physiological assays for nutrient demand by the plankton.  I. Nitrogen. J. Plankton
        Res. 3: 685-697.

 Vitousek, P.  M. (1977) The regulation of element concentrations in mountain streams in the northeastern United
        States. Ecol. Monogr. 47: 65-87.                                                  -

 Vitousek, P. M. (1981) Clear-cutting and the nitrogen  cycle. In: Clark, F. E.; Rosswall, T., eds. Terrestrial
        nitrogen cycles - processes, ecosystem strategies and management impacts: proceedings of an international
        workshop; September 1979; Osterfarnebo, Sweden. Ecol. Bull. 33: 631-642.

 Vitousek, P. M.; Reiners, W. A. (1975) Ecosystem succession and nutrient retention: a  hypothesis.  Bioscience
        25: 376-381.

 Vitousek, P. M.; Gosz, J. R.; Grier, C. C.; Melillo, J. M.; Reiners, W. A.; Todd, R. L. (1979) Nitrate losses
        from disturbed ecosystems. Science (Washington, DC) 204: 469-474.

 Vitousek, P. M.; Gosz, J. R.; Grier, C.  C.; Mellilo, J. M.; Reiners, W. R. (1982) A comparative analysis of
       nitrification and nitrate mobility in forest ecosystems. Ecol. Monogr. 52: 155-177.

 Vollenweider, R. A. (1968) Water management research. Paris, France: OECD;  report DAS/CSI/68.27.

von Liebig, J. (1840) Chemistry and its application to agriculture and physiology. London,  United Kingdom:
       Taylor and Walton.

Vose, J. M.; Swank, W. T. (1990) Preliminary estimates of foliar absorption of  ISN labeled nitric acid vapor
                  mature eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.).  Can. J. For. Res.:  In press.
 August 1991
10-284       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 Vose, J. M.; Swank, W. T.; Taylor, R. W.; Dashek, W. V.; Williams, A. L. (1989) Foliar absorption of I5N
        labeled nitric acid vapor (HNO3) in mature eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.). In: Atmospheric
        deposition: proceedings of a symposium; May; Baltimore, MD. IAHS publication no. 179; pp. 4-12.

 Waring, R. H. (1987)  Nitrate pollution: a particular danger to boreal and subalpine coniferous forests. In:
        Fujimori,  T.; Kimura, M., eds. Human impacts and management of mountain forests: [proceedings of a
   '     symposium]. Ibaraki, Japan: Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute; pp. 93-105.

 Waring, R. H.; Pitman, G. B. (1985) Modifying lodgepole pine stands to change susceptibility,to mountain pine
        beetle attack. Ecology 66: 889-897.

 Waring, R. H.; Schlesiriger, W. H. (1985) Forest ecosystems: concepts and management. Orlando, FL:
        Academic Press, Inc.

 Weetman, G. F.;  Hill, S. B. (1973) General environmental and biological concerns in relation to forest
        fertilization. In: Leaf, A. L.; Leonard, R. E., eds. Forest fertilization: symposium proceedings; August
        1972; Warrensburg, NY. Upper Darby, PA: U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service; pp. 19-35;
        USD A Forest  Service general technical report NE-3. Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA;
        PB-271094.

 Welch, E. B.; Spyridakis, D. E.; Smayda, T. (1986) Temporal chemical variability in acid sensitive high
        elevation lakes. Water Air Soil Pollut. 31: 35-44.

 Weller, D. E.; Peterjohn, W. T.; Goff, N. M.; Correll, D. L. (1986) Ion and acid budgets for a forested
        Atlantic Coastal Plain watershed and their implications for the impacts of acid deposition.  In: Correll,
        D. L., ed. Watershed research perspectives. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press;
        pp. 392-421.

 Wells,  C. G. (1971) Effects of prescribed burning on soil chemical properties and nutrient availability. In:
    ;    Prescribed burning symposium: proceedings; April; Charleston, SC. Asheville, NC: U. S. Department  of
        Agriculture Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station; pp.  86-99.

 Wesely, M. L.; Eastman, J. A.; Stedman, D. H.;  Yalvac, E. D. (1982) An eddy-correlation measurement of
        NO2 flux  to vegetation and comparison to O3 flux. Atmos. Environ. 16:  815-820.

 West, N.  E.; Skujins, J., eds. (1978) Nitrogen in desert ecosystems. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson &
        Ross, Inc. (US/IBP synthetic series 9).

 Westerman, R. L.; Tucker, T. C. (1978)  Denitrification in desert soils. In: West, N. E.; Skujins, J., eds.
'        Nitrogen  in desert ecosystems. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc.; pp. 75-106.
         (US/IBP synthesis series 9).                                                   '

 Westman, W. E.  (1977) How much are nature's services worth? Science (Washington, DC) 197: 960-964.

 Wetselaar, R.; Farquhar, G. D. (1980) Nitrogen losses from tops of plants. Adv.  Agron. 33: 263-302.

 Wetzel, R. G. (1983) Limnology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: W. B.  Sanders.

 Wheeler,  B. D.; Giller, K. E.  (1982) Species richness of herbaceous fen vegetation in Broadland, Norfolk in
         relation to the quantity of above-ground plant material. J. Ecol. 70: 179-200.

 White, T. C. R.  (1984) The abundance of invertebrate herbivores in relation to  the availability of nitrogen in
         stressed food  plants. Oecologia 63: 90-105.
   August 1991
10-285
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Whitford, L. A.; Schumacher, G. J. (1961) Effect of current on mineral uptake and respiration by a fresh-water
       alga. Limnol. Oceanogr. 6: 423-425. .                         •

Whitford, L. A.; Schumacher, G. J. (1964) Effect of a current on respiration and mineral uptake in Spirogyra
       and Oedogonium. Ecology 45: 168-170.

Wiebe, W. J.; Johannes, R. E.; Webb, K. L. (1975) Nitrogen fixation in a coral reef community. Science
       (Washington, DC) 188: 257-259.

Wigington, P. J.; Davies, T. D.; Tranter, M.; Eshleman, K. (1989) Episodic acidification of surface waters due
       to acidic deposition. Washington, DC: National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program; State-of-science
       technology report 12.

Williams, M. W.; Melack, J. M. (n.d.a) Precipitation chemistry and ionic loading to an alpine basin, Sierra
       Nevada. Water Resour. Res.: In press.

Williams, M. W.; Melack, J. M. (n.d.b) Solute chemistry of snowmelt and runoff in an alpine basin, Sierra,
       Nevada. Water Resour. Res.: in press.

Winner, W. E.; Atkinson, C. J. (1986) Absorption of air pollution by plants, and consequences for growth.
       TREE 1:  15-18.

Wisheu, I. C.; Keddy, P. A. (1989) The conservation and management of a threatened coastal plain plant
       community in eastern North America (Nova Scotia, Canada). Biol. Conserv.  48: 229-238.

Woodin, S. J.; Lee, J. A. (1987) The fate of some components of acidic deposition in ombrotrophic mires.
       Environ. Pollut. 45: 61-72.

Woodin, S.; Press, M. C.; Lee, J. A. (1985) Nitrate reductase activity in Sphagnum fuscum in relation to wet
       deposition of nitrate from the atmosphere.  New Phytol. 99: 381-388.

Woodmansee, R. G.  (1978) Additions and losses of nitrogen in grassland ecosystems. Bioscience 28:  448-453.

Woodwell, G. M. (1970) Effects of pollution on the structure and physiology of ecosystems: changes in natural
       ecosystems caused by many different types of disturbances are similar and predictable. Science
       (Washington, DC) 168: 429-433.

World Health Organization. (1987) The effects of nitrogen on vegetation. In: Air quality guidelines for Europe.
       Copenhagen, Denmark: Regional Office for Europe; pp. 373-385. (WHO regional publications, European
       series no. 23).

Worsnop, G.; Will, G. M. (1980) Fate of 15N urea fertiliser applied to a recently thinned radiata pine stand on a
       pumice soil.  N. Z. J. For. Sci. 10: 381-394.

Wulff, F.; Stigebrandt, A.; Rahm, L. (1990) Nutrient dynamics of the Baltic Sea. Ambio 19: 126-133.

Wurtsbaugh, W. A.; Home, A. J. (1983) Iron in eutrophic Clear Lake, California: its importance for algal
       nitrogen fixation and growth. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 40: 1419-1429.

Yates, P.; Sheridan,  J. M. (1983) Estimating the effectiveness of vegetated floodplains/wetlands as nitrate-nitrite
       and orthophosphorus filters. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 9: 303-314.
 August 1991
10-286
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
Yoch, D. C.; Whiting, G. J. (1986) Evidence for NH4+ switch-off regulation of nitrogenase activity by bacteria
       in salt marsh sediments and roots of the grass Spartina alterniflora. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
       51:  143-149.

Zemba, S. G.; Golomb, D.; Fay, J. A. (1988) Wet sulfate and nitrate deposition patterns in eastern North
       America. Atmos. Environ. 22: 2751-2761.
 •August 1991
10-287
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------

-------
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
            11.  EFFECTS OF  NITROGEN OXIDES
                              ON VISIBILITY          *
     Clear days are an important aesthetic resource for us all.  They also carry
     commercial value for tourism and real estate.  Thus, the appearance of layers of
     smoggy haze over cities and across rural vistas is one of the most widely noticed
     effects  of air pollution (Sloane and White, 1986).
     Emissions of nitrogen Oxides (NOX) can contribute significantly to visibility impairment,
or the "layers of smoggy haze" noted by Sloane and White.  They Can have aesthetic impact
because they can cause a yellow-brown discoloration of the atmosphere when present in
plumes or in urban, regional, and layered haze.  They can also reduce visual  range, thereby
diminishing the contrast of distant objects viewed through an atmosphere containing nitrogen
oxides.
     Only some of the species in the NOX family, however, are optically active and thus able
to affect atmospheric visibility. Figure 11-1 illustrates the major categories (including
atmospheric oxidation products) of NOX species and the two species that have an effect on
visibility:  nitrogen dioxide (NO^, a gas that absorbs light, chiefly at the blue end of the
visible spectrum; and nitrate aerosols (NOg), particles that scatter light.  The other forms of
NOX that occur in ambient air,  nitric oxide (NO), nitrous acid (HNO2), and nitric acid
(HNO3), are optically inactive gases and therefore do not contribute to visibility impairment.
(Nitrous acid, however, interferes with chemiluminescence NO2 measurements and therefore
would indirectly affect the estimation of the effects of NO2 on visibility.).  Thus, depending
on the form in which NOX exists  in the atmosphere, NOX may or may not play a significant
role overall in visibility.  For example, nitrate aerosol may never form from  nitric acid in
warm climates; in areas with low ambient atmospheric concentrations of ammonia (NH3); or
in areas with high ambient concentrations of sulfate (SOJ), since sulfate preferentially reacts
with available atmospheric ammonia.
     Nitrogen oxides have been found to play a significant role in the aesthetic impact caused
by combustion emission sources such as power plants. This impact is dominated by the
yellow-brown coloration caused by NO2 relatively near the source (within 100 km).  Nitrate
aerosols have been found to play a significant role in the haze observed in urban areas;
        August 1991
                                         11-1
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
    &<+>+v
    a*i:|:|:;:;:;

I
•ST.

                       .

                     ili
                      LLI
                      O
                      g
                      o
                                         •
                                        (0
                                      o-

                                     il*
                                      o~
              I
                                                       4)



                                                       I

                                                       T3
                                 8


                                 1



                                 I
                                                       •s
                                 (U
                                 I
                                 TH

                                 rH

                                 
-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
particularly during winter and near significant ammonia sources (such as cattle grazing fields
and feedlots).  Nitrate aerosols, along with sulfate, may also play a significant role in the
formation of wintertime layered haze that has been observed in the vicinity of large,  isolated
power plants.
     Although NOX has a clearly defined effect on visibility (aesthetic impacts and visual
range reduction), in most areas of the country visibility impairment is usually dominated by
other species, such as sulfate and elemental and organic carbon particles.  Also,  it should be
noted that brownish atmospheric discoloration may be caused by non-nitrogenous particles
such as sulfate and not solely by NO2 and nitrate.
11.1  OVERVIEW OF LIGHT SCATTERING AND ABSORPTION
     The visibility effects of the optically active forms of NOX, nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and
nitrate aerosols (NO^), can best be illustrated by reviewing some of the fundamentals of
atmospheric optics.  The deterioration of visibility is the result of the absorption and
scattering of light by gaseous molecules and suspended solid or liquid particles (Middleton,
1952).  Absorbed light is transformed into other forms of energy, such as heat, while
scattered light is re-radiated in all directions.
     The effect of the intervening atmosphere on the visibility and coloration of a viewed
object, such as the horizon sky, a distant mountain-, or a cloud, can be calculated by solving
the radiation transfer equation along the line of sight (see schematic in Figure 11-2).  This
equation can be solved if the light extinction properties of the intervening atmosphere are
known.
     The change in the light intensity of a specific wavelength, or spectral radiance I(A), as a
function of distance along the line of sight can be calculated as follows (Chandrasekhar,
1960; Larimer and Samuelsen, 1975, 1978; Latimer et al.,  1978; White et al., 1986):
                                   ;= -bext(A)I(A)
                                                    4?r
                                                                               (11-1)
28
        August 1991
                                         11-3
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
SUN
                        ELEMENTAL VOLUME







<
1 Figure ]
2
3 Source: I
4
5
6
7 where
8
9 I(A)
10
11 r
12
13
14 p(A,9)
15
16 FS(A)
17
18 D
19
20
21
22 bscat(A)
23
24 bext(A)
August 1
\ (CONTAINING AIR,
\ / PARTICLES, AND NO2)
SCATTERING /*\ /
ANGLE, 6 / \ 	 t. LINE OF SIGHT
/ / x
	 *..„..> _ 	 fc . . / iV
y ^r^ *• 	 — ••••.• l>
/ V j , jj
i 	 	 — t a
OBJECT OBSERVER
11-2. Schematic of an elemental volume of haze along a line of sight.

.atimer and Ireson (1980).





= the spectral light intensity of wavelength A,

= the distance along the line of sight from the object to the observer (see
Figure 11-2 for definitions),

= the scattering distribution or phase function for the scattering angle 6,

= the solar flux (watt/m2/jiim) incident on the line of sight,

= the diffuse light source term. (Diffuse light emanates from directions other tl
that of the sun. This light results from light scattered from other portions of
atmosphere and light reflected from the surface of the Earth and from clouds.

= the light scattering coefficient, and

= the light extinction coefficient, the sum of scattering and absorption.
991 n_4 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR C
.•>
























lan
the
)




ITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
     An examination of Equation 11-1 indicates that light can be both removed and added to
the line of sight.  The first term on the right side of this equation represents the rate at which
light is removed from the line of sight, while the second term is the rate at which it is added.
If the first term is larger than the second, the net effect is a decrease in light intensity
(darkening) of an observed object as one moves along the line of sight (see upper curve in
Figure 11-3).  If the second term is larger than the first, the net effect is an increase in light
intensity (brightening) of an observed  object.  The darkening effect, the first term, is
dependent on total light extinction (bext), which is the sum of light  scattering and absorption.
The brightening effect, the second term, is dependent only on light scattering (bscat).  Thus,
light absorption can only darken objects viewed through the atmosphere, while light scattering
can either brighten or darken viewed objects.   Since NO2 is a gas that preferentially absorbs
blue light, it always tends to darken and discolor the sky and objects viewed through the
atmosphere.  Since nitrate aerosol scatters  light, it can  either brighten or darken the sky and
objects.  In Equation 11-1, the light extinction coefficient is the sum of its light scattering and
light extinction components:
                        = bscat(X) + babs(X) = (bsg + bsp)  + (bag + bap).
                              (11-2)
     The first term, b  ,  is the scattering coefficient attributable to gases and is the result
primarily of Rayleigh scattering caused by gases in the atmosphere (chiefly N2 and O^). The
second term, b  , is the scattering coefficient from particles suspended in the atmosphere
(aerosols).  Nitrate aerosol contributes to this term, along with other aerosols, including
sulfates, organic and elemental carbon, and other particulate matter, both fine (<  2.5 ^m in
diameter) and coarse (>  2.5 ^m in diameter).  The third term, bag, is the absorption
coefficient resulting from gases.  Nitrogen dioxide is the only significant contributor to this
term in the visible spectrum.  The fourth and last term, bap, is the absorption coefficient
resulting from particles.  This  term  is dominated by the effect of elemental carbon (soot), a
combustion product found, for example, in diesel engine exhaust.
     All of these components  of total light extinction,  as well as total extinction itself,  are
functions of the wavelength of light. As discussed in more detail later, the atmospheric
        August 1991
                                           11-5
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                   6-1
                                   BRIGHT OBJECT
                      UQHT INTENSITY OF HORIZON
                                   BLACK OBJECT
                                   OBJECT-OBSERVER DISTANCE, re
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Figure 11-3.  Effect of a homogeneous atmosphere on light intensity of bright and dark
             objects as a function of distance along a line of sight.
Source:  Latimer and Ireson (1980).
discoloration caused by NOX (both NO2 and nitrate aerosol) can be explained by the
wavelength-dependent nature of NO2 light absorption and nitrate light scattering effects.
Both scattering and absorption from these NOX species are stronger at the blue end of the
visible spectrum (wavelength A = 0.4 /tin) than at the red end (X = 0.7 /*m).
     The light extinction (bext) coefficient is the optical equivalent of ambient pollutant
concentration.  This parameter (as well as its scattering and absorption components) has units
of inverse distance (e.g., m"1, km"1, Mm"1). These coefficients can be considered to be the
equivalent light extinction, scattering, or absorption cross-sectional area (m2) per unit volume
of ambient air (m3). The scattering or absorption coefficient can be determined from the
product of the concentration of an optically active species and its light scattering or specific
       August 1991
                                        11-6
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
absorption efficiency (/8).  This efficiency is commonly stated in units of m2/g.  When the
ambient concentration Gig/m3) of a given species is multiplied by its extinction efficiency
(m2/g), the extinction coefficient of that species, in units of inverse megameters (Mm"1), is
obtained.
     The light extinction efficiency for particles (absorption, bap, and especially scattering,
bsp) is a strong function of particle size (see Figure 11-4). Fine particles, those with
diameters less than 2.5 /mi, are much more effective per unit mass in scattering light than are
coarse particles, those with diameters > 2.5 jum.   Particle scattering efficiency is a maximum
             0.
                            TYPICAL
                            NONABSORB1NG
                            AEROSOL
                                                                                       10.0
                                        PARTICLE DIAMETER,
11
12
13
14
 Figure 11-4.  Light extinction efficiency at A = 0.55 /tin as a function of particle size for
              soot and for typical, nonabsorbing atmospheric aerosol.
 Source:  Latimer (1988a) after Bergstrom (1973).                       "
        August 1991
                                          11-7
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
for particles having a diameter of approximately 0.5 jwm.  Coarse particles have scattering
efficiencies that are approximately an order of magnitude smaller (see Figure 11-4).
     Nitrate particles can be either coarse or fine.  Milford and Davidson (1987) reviewed
the sizes of particulate sulfate and nitrate in the atmosphere; nitrate mass median diameters
ranged from 0.23 to 4.2 /*m in 16 different measurement sets.  Wolff (1984) noted that in
continental environments nitrate can exist as either coarse or fine; however, in a number of
summertime studies in the eastern U.S., nitrate concentrations were quite low and nitrate
occurred primarily in the coarse mode (Wolff, 1984; Mamane and Dzubay, 1986). Wolff
explained this qualitatively by the reaction of alkaline soil dust with HNO3; nitrate aerosol  is
not formed in the submicron mode if temperatures are high or ammonia is not available or is
tied up with sulfate.  It should be noted, however, that the data of Wolff (1984) were
collected using  methods later found to have significant artifact problems. In coastal
environments, nitrate may also be primarily in the coarse mode because of reaction with sea
salt (Yoshizumi, 1986; Wall et al., 1988; Orel and Seinfeld,  1977; Mamane and Mehler,
1987). Richards (1983) suggested that coarse particle nitrate may form from nighttime
oxidation involving N2O5-H2O reactions on the surfaces of particles.  Nitrate is in the
submicron fine  mode when it reacts directly with ammonia to form ammonium nitrate
(Orel and Seinfeld, 1977; Wolff, 1984).  The submicron nitrate forms when conditions are
favorable (abundant ambient ammonia and moderate temperatures).
     Nitrate aerosol  in the size range of 0.1 to 2.5  pm is most effective per unit mass in
scattering light.  For particles having a typical density (/>) of 2 g/cm3 and a diameter  of
0.5 jtm, Figure 11-4 shows that the scattering efficiency at the middle of the visible spectrum
(X = 0.55 urn)  is approximately 5 m2/g.  By contrast, the average NO2 absorption efficiency
over the wavelengths 0.45 to 0.65 /^m, centered on 0.55 jt*m, is 0.144 m2/g (Latimer and
Ireson, 1988, based on Dixon, 1940).  Thus, the extinction efficiency of nitrate aerosol can
be more than an order of magnitude greater than that for NO2.  As discussed in the next
section, the extinction efficiencies of both nitrate aerosol and NO2 gas are strong functions  of
the wavelength, being larger at the blue end (X = 0.4 /*m) of the visible spectrum.
       August 1991
                                         11-8
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     11.2 ATMOSPHERIC DISCOLORATION CAUSED BY NITROGEN
 2           OXIDES
 3          As Finlan (1981) so aptly stated:  "Many of the most beautiful sights in nature are
 4     caused by wavelength-dependent light scattering.  It can be truly exhilarating to see the
 5     beauty of the blue sky or to witness a rainbow, a sunset or a sunrise. Unfortunately, the
 6     physical processes responsible for these beautiful sights also cause much of the color that we
 7     often see in smogs and hazes over cities."
 8          The undesirable yellow or whisky-brown color of hazes has been an ongoing topic of
 9     discussion in the literature for more than 20 years.  Hodkinson (1966) described the effects
10     that NO2 could produce on the color of the atmosphere.  Charlson and Ahlquist (1969),
11     however, argued that wavelength-dependent scattering was the primary cause of atmospheric
12     discoloration in most situations.  Horvath (1971) countered with the argument that any color
13     caused by wavelength-dependent light scattering that removed light from the line of sight
14     would be offset by the additional light scattered into the line of sight by the same wavelength-
15     dependent scattering. Thus, he thought that any color would be the result of the absorption
16     of blue light by NO2.  He did conclude, however, that if extremely bright objects were
17     viewed through an aerosol, a discoloration could result.  Charlson et al. (1972) measured
18     NO2 concentrations and the wavelength dependence of the light scattering  coefficient in
19     Pasadena, California, during August and September  1970 and concluded that NO2 had a
20     significant effect on  atmospheric color 20 percent of the time. Sloane (1987) applied Mie
21     theory to calculate the effects of urban haze mixtures of NO2 and elemental carbon (soot).
22     She found that soot can offset the coloration caused by NO2, even though both species absorb
23     preferentially at the blue end of the spectrum.  Husar and White (1976)  performed careful
24     atmospheric optics calculations using Mie scattering  theory (Kerker,  1969) to assess the
25     relative roles of wavelength-dependent light scattering by particles and wavelength-dependent
26     light absorption caused by NO2.  They found that particles typical of Los Angeles haze could
27     cause yellow-brown  discoloration when the sun was  behind the observer (scattering angle
28     8 >  90°), and typical NO2 concentrations could perceptibly add to this color. More detailed
29     analysis by Finlan (1981) confirmed the importance of scattering angle and the size
30     distribution and refractive index of the aerosol in determining atmospheric color.
        August 1991
11-9
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
      Atmospheric color can be studied theoretically by solving Equation 11-1 for the spectral
 radiance or light intensity of an object observed at distance r as follows (Middleton, 1952;
 Latimer and Samuelsen, 1975, 1978; Latimer et al., 1978; Husar and White, 1976; White
 etal., 1986):
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
                  Ir(A) = I0(A) exp(-r)  + J [1 - exp(-r)],
(11-3)
 where
 Ir, I0  =  spectral light intensities at distance r from an object and at the object itself,
 r     =  optical depth between the object and the observer (= J bext dr),
 J     =  the source function (the second term in Equation 11-1, divided by bext).


     Equation 11-3 can be used to evaluate the effect of a uniform concentration of NO2 on
 atmospheric coloration. The ratio of the intensity of the horizon sky (h) with and without a
 given concentration of NO2 can be calculated from Equation 11-3 as follows (Hodkinson,
 1966; Robinson, 1968; White,  1982):
                                               = (1 + b V
                                                                               (11-4)
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
     The light absorption coefficient for NO2, bag, is a stiong function of wavelength.
Figure 11-5 shows the wavelength dependence of the NO2 light absorption coefficient over
the visible spectrum (Dixon, 1940; Latimer and Ireson,  1980);  The value at the blue end of
the visible spectrum, X = 0.4 jitm, is 1.71  km"1 ppm"1,  more than five .times larger than the
value at the center of the visible spectrum at a green wavelength A = 0.55 jttm (0.33 km"1
ppm"1), and approximately  100  times larger than at the red end of the spectrum at a
wavelength of 0.7 /*m (0.017 km"1 ppm"1). When Equation 11-4 is evaluated as a function
of wavelength (A), the curves shown in Figure 11-6 are  obtained for the horizon sky light
intensity ratio (Hodkinson,  1966; White, 1982).  Nitrogen dioxide causes  a darkening effect,
especially at the blue end of the visible spectrum.  For example, with an NO2-visual range
August 1991                             H_10       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
                       §
                       E
                        >   0.05
                        J  0.04
                            0.01
                               0.4
                                         0.5            0.6
                                      WAVELENGTH (A), nm
Figure 11-5. Light absorption efficiency of nitrogen dioxide as a function of the
             wavelength of light hi the visible spectrum, 0.4 jon <  A <  0.7 jon.
Source: Latimer and Ireson (1980) after Dixon (1940).
product of 0.3 ppm-km, the horizon sky light intensity at A = 0.4 /Ltm is about 14 percent
less than it would be without NO2 and would thus be quite noticeably discolored (yellow or
                                                                                  ^
brown).  This concentration-visual range product could be caused by 0.03 pp'm (60 /*g/m )
NO2 associated with a visual range of 10 km (typical of urban haze) and by 0.0015 ppm
(3 jug/m3) NO2 associated with a visual range of 200 km  (typical of much of the nonurban
western U.S.).
     Atmospheric aerosols, including particulate nitrates, can also cause atmospheric
discoloration (Ahlquist and Charlson, 1969;  Husar and White, 1976). The scattering
        Month 1991
                                         11-11
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
                                   0.4
                                    BLUE
                                            0.5          0.6
                                         WAVELENGTH, urn
O.7
RED
 Figure 11-6.  Effect of nitrogen dioxide on horizon sky brightness as a function of the
              wavelength of light; relative horizon brightness, bext/(bext + b  ) for
              selected values of the product of NO2 concentration and visual range
              assuming that b&it = 3/(visual range).
 Source:  White (1982) adapted from Hodkinson (1966).
coefficient of particles smaller .than 1.5 /tm in diameter can be strongly dependent on the
wavelength of light as shown in Table 11-1 (Latimer and Ireson,  1980).  For example, an
aerosol with a mass median diameter of 0.5 ^m has a light scattering coefficient b   f which
                                                                           SCcil
is inversely proportional to wavelength X.  Thus, light scattering at the blue end
(A = 0.4 ^m) of the visible spectrum would be 75 percent greater (7/4  = 1,75) than at the
red end (A  = 0.7 jim).  Since the light scattering coefficient caused by aerosols and the light
absorption coefficient caused by NO2 are both wavelength dependent, both can cause
atmospheric discoloration.
       August 1991
                                         11-12      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
      TABLE 11-1.  WAVELENGTH DEPENDENCE OF LIGHT SCATTERING
       COEFFICIENT AS A FUNCTION OF PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Mass Median
Diameter
0
0
0
0
0
0
(DG),a/im
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
0.8
1
.0
>5
cP
2.8
2.1
1.6
,.-1.2
1.0
0.7
0.5
0.2
0
"Geometric standard deviation crg = 2.
ba is defined as follows:




[A
b nfLA-i) = 0 JXj) —
bL-dU *• JL' ovdV- £j \
A

i
± -a
2
(appropriate for 0.4 < A < 0.7
Source:  Latimer and Ireson (1980).

     Husar arid White (1976)" formulated the problem of atmospheric coloration rigorously in
terms of radiation  transfer theory.  A solution was derived from theory and from aerosol size
distributions measured in Los Angeles.  They found that aerosol (without NO^ could cause
yellow-brown discoloration, and that this discoloration would increase as NO2 concentrations
increase and as the scattering angle 9 increases.  Noticeable discoloration from NO2 was
found to occur at concentrations as low as 0.05 ppm.  The discoloration effect caused by
particles, unlike that caused by NO2, is dependent on the scattering angle, B, with most
intense effects occurring in situations in which the sun is behind the observer (8 > 90°).  In
addition, when the,viewed object has a light intensity greater than the horizon sky light
intensity (the Ih asymptote in Figure 11-3),  light, scattered by fine particles would cause a
darkening and discoloring effect because of the wavelength-dependent light scatter.
     Waggoner et al.  (1983) used teleradiometer measurements to determine the color of the
winter haze in Denver that is commonly known as the "brown cloud." Although this haze
appeared to be brown in contrast to the blue sky above, they found that its spectral  .
light-intensity distribution was gray and was caused primarily by aerosol .rather than NO2.
        August 1991
                                        11-13
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
31
32
33
 These findings were consistent with the conclusions of Horvath (1971) and Husar and White
 (1976) that yellow haze could appear brown if it were darker than the viewing background.
 The chromatic adaptation of the human eye-brain system (Cornsweet, 1970) also explains
 why a gray haze may appear yellow or brown.  An observer that has adapted to the color of
 the blue sky will visually perceive a gray haze as the complementary color to that adaptation
 (i.e., yellow or brown).
 11.3  VISUAL RANGE REDUCTION CAUSED BY NITROGEN OXIDES
     At some distance from a black object, an observer can no longer distinguish between the
 intensity of it and the sky.  This limit of perceptibility is defined by a threshold (liminal)
 contrast which is just noticeable to a human observer. The distance at which the contrast of a
 black object against the horizon sky equals this threshold is called  the visual range, or
 commonly, visibility.  Although a range of values for the threshold contrast from about 1 to
 5 percent is supported by the literature (Middleton, 1952; U. S. Environmental Protection
 Agency, 1979; Latimer, 1988b), the threshold human visual perception threshold is
 commonly assumed to be a contrast of 2 percent.                       «
     Koschmieder (1924) developed a formula for visual range, which is based on the
 assumptions that the threshold contrast is 2 percent, that the atmosphere is uniform and cloud-
 free, and that the curvature of the Earth can be ignored when evaluating horizon light
 intensity.  The Koschmieder equation is simply:
             rv  =  - ln(Cmin)/b(
                                                  (H-5)
where
                  ext
the visual range,
the contrast perceptibility threshold, and
the light extinction coefficient, as
defined previously.
If the commonly accepted threshold of 2 percent is used above, the Koschmieder equation
becomes
                 rv = 3.9/bext,
                                                                                   (11-6)
       August 1991
                                       11-14      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
the most common form of. the equation. If the perceptibility threshold is assumed to be
5 percent, which appears to correlate best with common airport visibility measurements
(Johnson,  1981; Latimer, 1988b), the equation becomes:
                 rv = 3/bexf
                          (11-7)
     Note that as the light extinction coefficient increases, visual range decreases. This
inverse relationship suggests that increases in atmospheric concentrations of light scattering
and absorbing species will cause a decrease in visibility. Figure 11-7 illustrates this
                                                                      /^
relationship for fine particles assumed to have a scattering  efficiency of 4 m /g (U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1979).  Since both of the optically active NOX species,
NO2 and nitrate aerosol, contribute to the absorption and scattering components of light
extinction (bext), they both tend to reduce visual range.                -,.,....
     If it is not uniformly distributed in the atmosphere, NO2 may not contribute to a
reduction in the contrast of a distant object and hence to visual range reduction. This can
happen when NO2 is located relatively close to the observer (e.g.,,in a plume or haze layer).
In such a situation, the light absorbed by NO2 reduces the light intensity of both the sky and.
the dark object equally, so that the sky and object are darkened but their contrast remains
unaffected.  Latimer and Samuelsen (1975, 1978) developed a formula to account for this
effect  for atmospheres containing NO2 plumes.
 11.4  NITRATE PHASE CHANGES AND HYGROSCOPICITY
      The role played by nitrate particles in urban, regional, and layered haze and in plumes
 is currently uncertain because of the volatile nature of this species.  Unlike sulfate, which is
 always in the particulate phase, nitrate often remains in the gas phase as nitric acid. In order
 for condensation of particulate nitrate (ammonium nitrate, NH4NO3) to occur, there must be
 sufficient atmospheric ammonia to react with nitric acid. Furthermore, the vapor pressure of
 ammonium nitrate is strongly temperature-dependent, so that even if ammonia is present in
 the atmosphere nitrate particles may not condense because of moderate or high temperatures.
        August 1991
                                          11-15
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
'9
10
11
12

13

14

15

16
                                         ^ADDITION OF 1/
-------
 1           The issue of changes in phase between gas and aerosol is a key uncertainty in
 2      understanding, measuring, and mathematically modeling the impacts of nitrate aerosol (Sloane
 3      and White, 1986):
 4           Just as a cloud produces a dramatic visual effect when only a small fraction of the water
 5           vapor changes phase, a substantial naze results if only a fraction of the gaseous pollutant
 6           mass enters a condensed phase.  In this regard, visibility is unique among air pollution
 7           effects; it depends not only on the amount of air pollution but in addition on its phase.
 8           This peculiarity greatly complicates the prediction of visibility impairment and aerosol
 9,         measurement procedures because the equilibrium between the condensed and gaseous
10          phases can be fragile.
12          Ammonium nitrate particles will form only if (1) sufficient ambient ammonia is present
13     to neutralize gas phase nitric acid (HNO3) and (2) temperatures and relative humidities are
14     such that the thermodynamic equilibrium favors the formation of nitrate aerosol (Stelson
15     et al., 1979; Stelson and Seinfeld, 1982; Saxena et al.,  1986; Sloane and White, 1986).
16     Ammonia reacts preferentially with acidic sulfate compounds until it is fully neutralized as
17     ammonium sulfate (Saxena et al.,  1986).  If sufficient gas  phase ammonia is left after sulfate
18     neutralization and temperatures are low enough, ammonium nitrate aerosol will condense.  At
19     relative humidities above 62 percent, the deliquescent point for ammonium nitrate, water
20    vapor is taken up in the nitrate particle (droplet), forming  a water solution (Saxena et al.,
21      1986).  At these higher relative humidities, a new equilibrium is established favoring more
22     nitrate in the particulate phase (Sloane and White,  1986).
23          The net result of all of the nitrate phase interactions is that particulate ammonium nitrate
 24     "can build up only in locations where sufficient ammonia is present to neutralize the sulfuric
 25     acid.  This occurs, for example, in Los Angeles  and Denver, where sulfate concentrations are
 26     relatively low compared to concentrations of ammonia"  (Milford and Davidson, 1987).
 27     White and Macias (1987) attribute the extremely low nitrate aerosol concentrations observed
 28     in the intermountain West to very low ambient nitric acid  and ammonia concentrations and to
 29     the warm temperatures  during the non-winter months.  Thus, the conditions can be
 30     summarized under which fine nitrate particles are most likely to form:  high ambient
 31     concentrations of ammonia and nitric acid (e.g., Los Angeles, Denver), low ambient
 32     concentrations of sulfate (e.g.,  mo'st of the western U.S.), low temperatures (e.g., winter),
 33     and high humidities  (e.g.,  winter, coastal sites).  Conversely, fine nitrate particles are least
 34     likely to form under the following conditions: low ambient concentrations of ammonia and
         August 1991
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
 nitric acid (e.g., intermountain West), high ambient concentrations of sulfate
 (e.g., the eastern U.S.), high temperatures (e.g., summer), and low relative humidities (e.g.,
 the Southwest).  Furthermore, if sufficient coarse particles exist that can react with nitric acid
 (e.g., sea salt, alkaline soil dust), coarse nitrate particle formation is favored.  As subsequent
 discussion bears out, these generalizations based on thermodynamic equilibrium explain much
 of observed nitrate aerosol behavior.             ••••.,.                   ,   ,        ;-,
      The extreme volatility of particulate nitrate makes its measurement extremely difficult
 and uncertain (Sloane and White, 1986). Significant positive and negative artifacts can occur
 with different measurement techniques using different filter media.  Glass fiber filters have a
 significant positive nitrate particle artifact because they tend to sorb nitric acid vapor (Appel
 et al., 1985).  Significant particle nitrate loss from quartz filters in storage was noted by
 Dunwoody  (1986). Teflon filters may have a significant negative artifact because nitrate is
 volatilized during or after the sampling, resulting in a potential underestimation of nitrate
 particle mass.  Volatilization  losses of fine particle nitrate are likely to be even greater for a
 Teflon filter loaded with acid sulfate than from a clean filter.  As reported by a number of
 researchers,  actual particle nitrate concentrations tend to be about 20 to 50 percent higher
 than Teflon-based measurements, on an annual average basis (Appel et al., 1981; Stevens,
 1987; John,  1986;  Cadle, 1985).  However, others (White and Macias,  1987; Malm and
 Gebhard, 1988) suggest that at least during winter conditions nitrate particle measurements
 might be low by factors of three to five. The denuder/nylon-filter method may be the most
 accurate measurement technique (Malm  et al., 1989; Allegrini and De Santis, 1989; Stevens
 et al., 1988; Mulawa and Cadle,  1985); however, only limited data are available that were
 obtained with this technique.  Thus, in evaluating empirical studies of the importance of
 nitrate to total light extinction, it is important to consider the complications caused by
 uncertainty in nitrate particle measurements.
      Further complicating the definition of the role of nitrate is the fact  that nitrate particles
will absorb water vapor, becoming water solutions, at high humidities (above 62 percent).
The water associated with the nitrate  results in scattering efficiencies per unit mass of nitrate
that are much larger than dry  particle efficiencies. The effect on light scattering efficiencies
of liquid water associated with aerosols has  been known for a long time, but the specific
        August 1991
                                          11-18
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      effect of associated water is difficult to quantify. Empirical studies have used a nonlinear
 2      relative humidity term to attempt to account for this effect.
 3    .       Tang et al.  (1981) developed a computer model for calculating the optical properties of
 4,     nitrate particles, both alone and in combination with sulfate, as a function of particle size and
 5 •.,   relative humidity.  This model was based on multicomponent aerosol thermodynamic theory
 6      as a function of particle  chemical composition and relative humidity. Light scattering
 7  ,.   efficiencies were calculated from resulting particle sizes using Mie scattering theory.
 8      Figure 11^8 through 11-12 summarize the light extinction coefficients for 1 /zg/m3 of sulfate
 9      or nitrate aerosol, or both, as a function of humidity.  Figure 11-8 shows that pure
10     ammonium sulfate exhibits  a deliquescent point at 80 percent relative humidity.  At
11      humidities above 80 percent, water vapor condenses, thereby increasing the aerosol particle
12     size, volume, and light scattering.  At humidities below 80 percent, the extinction efficiencies
13     ,range from 1 to  4 m2/g  of sulfate; while above 80 percent humidity, extinction efficiencies
14  ..   can increase considerably above 10 m2/g. Figure 11-9 illustrates the hysteresis effect, that is,
15     , the ability of the particle to hold on to liquid water, that can result when relative humidity is
16      slowly decreased.  Figure 1140 shows the increase in light extinction of pure ammonium
17      nitrate aerosol as a function of relative humidity. At and above the deliquescent point at
 18      62 percent humidity, the scattering efficiency increases by a factor of two or more because of
 19      the condensed water vapor associated with the nitrate particle.  Figures 11-11 and 11-12 show
20      the effects of humidity on the light extinction efficiencies of different mixtures of sulfate and
 21   .   nitrate aerosols.  Externally mixed aerosols,  those in  which the sulfate and nitrate exist on
 22      different particles, exhibit the separate deliquescent points for ammonium sulfate (80 percent
 23      RH) and ammonium nitrate (62 percent RH).  Internally mixed aerosols, in which the sulfate
 24     and nitrate occur mixed within the same particle,  do not exhibit distinct deliquescent points
 25     and have less water associated with them at a given humidity; and hence have lower light
 26     extinction efficiencies.  The sulfate and nitrate aerosol mixtures may also exhibit hysteresis
 27     effects in situations where humidity is reduced, thereby causing a.haze to linger.
 28                  ,,      ,          .  .    ,  -
         August 1991
                                                              DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                 fc;   10'
                 UJ
                 o
                 El
                 u.
                 LU
                 8

                 O
                     10
                       ,-2
                     10
                        -3
                                      1.5
                                      2.0
                                      2.5
                                       1.01
                                 50      60      70      80     90

                                          RELATIVE HUMIDITY, %
                                                                  100
1
2
3
4
5
6
Figure 11-8. Light scattering coefficient for 1 /tg/m3 of sulfate or nitrate aerosol as a
             function of relative humidity; bscat versus relative humidity for ammonium
             sulfate aerosol (having particle size distributions characterized by D  =
             0.2 fim and ag  = 1.01, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5).                        g

Source:  Tang et al. (1981).                                  .,
      August 1991
                                       11-20     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
              2.4
              2.2  -
            0 20
          1
          ul
          i  1.8
    o
    a  i-e
    CO
    y
    g  1-4
    Su
       1.0
                          THEORETICAL
                          EXPERIMENTAL
                                             O
            20      30     40       50      60     70
                                 RELATIVE HUMIDITY, %
                                                                80
                90     100
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Figure 11-9.  Light scattering coefficient for 1 ftg/m3 of sulfate or nitrate aerosol as a
             function of relative humidity; bscat versus relative humidity for ammonium
             sulfate aerosol showing the effect of hysteresis.
Source:  Tang et al. (1981).
11.5 ROLE OF NITROGEN OXIDES IN URBAN HAZE
     The most significant effects of nitrogen dioxide and especially nitrate aerosols have been
observed in urban hazes, especially in western urban areas such as those in California; and in
wintertime urban hazes, Such as those in Phoenix and Denver.  The importance of nitrate has
been studied empirically by many researchers, but the caveats noted above regarding
measurement uncertainties should be kept in mind when interpreting these studies. In
addition, research has been  carried out in recent years on theoretical approaches for analyzing
urban haze chemical reactions and aerosol coagulation.
       August 1991
                                       11-21
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                      -1
                   10
               h-"
               UJ
               o
               E
               in
               o
               o

               §  io-2
                  10
                     -3
                             1.01
                             1.5
                             2.0
                               50      60     70     80     90
                                       RELATIVE HUMIDITY, %
                                                               100
1
2
3
4
5
6
Figure 11-10. Light scattering coefficient for 1 jtg/m3 of sulfate or nitrate aerosol as a
             function of relative humidity; bscat versus relative humidity for
             ammonium nitrate aerosol (having particle size distributions characterized
by Dg = 0.6
                            and ot  = 1.01, 1.5, and 2.0).
Source: Tang et al. (1981).
      August 1991
                                     11-22     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
           10
              -1
        yj
        O
        LJL
        LL
        111
        O
        O
            10'
                             CASS(1979)
                            EXTERNAL
                              MIXTURE-*
                    WHITE & ROBERTS (1977)
                                  (0.4,1.
                                 (0.29,1.5)
                             0.
                             (0
                                                        INTERNAL
                                                        MIXTURE
                                    .6,1.5)    >
                                    i.2,1.5)	^
                        50   60     70    80     90   100

                           RELATIVE HUMIDITY, %
Figure 11-11; Light scattering coefficient for 1 jig/m3 of sulfate or nitrate aerosol as a
            function of relative humidity; bscat versus relative humidity for externally
            and internally mixed sulfate and nitrate aerosols (S:N = 3:1) for
            indicated size distributions (Dg, «g).

Source: Tang et al. (1981).
      August 1991
                                   11_23      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                        10-1
                  LLJ
                  g
                  LL
                  LL.
                  LU
                  O
                  o
                 10-2
                      10-3
                                  EXTERNAL
                                   MIXTURE
                                  INTERNAL
                                  MIXTURE
                                      (0.4,1.5)
                                      (0.29,1.5) 11
                                      (Q.W.S)//
                                      (0.2,1.5)
                                     50     60      70      80     90
                                             RELATIVE HUMIDITY, %
                                                                      100
1
2
3
4
5
6
Figure 11-12.  Light scattering coefficient for 1 /tg/m3 of sulfate or nitrate aerosol as a
              function of relative humidity; bscat versus relative humidity for externally
              and internally mixed sulfate and nitrate aerosols (S:N = 1:2) for
              indicated size distributions (D , a ).
                                         <5  O

Source:  Tang et al. (1981).
      August 1991
                                       11-24      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      11.5.1  California Urban Areas
 2           The most work has been done and the most significant effects 'of NOX have been
 3      observed in California,  especially in the Los Angeles area.  White and Roberts (1977) studied,
 4      the statistical relationships between light scattering coefficient and the aerosol constituents of
 5      Los Angeles area smog measured during the summer and early fall of 1973 as part of the
 6      Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACHEX).  Using linear regression techniques,  they
 7      estimated that nitrate aerosols contributed, on average, about 27 percent of the total light
 8      scattering coefficient. Nitrates were found to have a light scattering efficiency, having units
 9      of m2/g of nitrate anion (multiply anion mass by 1.3 to obtain total ammonium nitrate mass),
10     of 1.7  ± 3.9 ju2, where \i is the relative humidity (in percent divided by 100).  Thus, at a
11      humidity of 50 percent, the light scattering coefficient of nitrates was estimated to be
12     2.7 m2/g. Appel et al. (1985) have commented that White and Roberts (1977) may have
13     seriously underestimated nitrate scattering efficiencies because the glass fiber filters used to
14     collect aerosol samples had a strong positive artifact (i.e., gaseous HNO3 was  deposited on
15     the filter,  thereby inflating the nitrate aerosol measurement).
16           Cass (1979) used linear regression to study the relationships between sulfate and nitrate
17     concentrations and visibility in Los Angeles over the decade, 1965 through 1974.  Sulfates
18  •    and nitrates were found to be significant contributors to total light extinction.  The best  fits to
19      measured visibility  were obtained with regression coefficients of the form, ft I (I - ^), where /*
20      is the relative humidity as defined previously:  This is indicative of hygroscopic or
21      deliquescent properties of sulfate and nitrate.  The values for ft for sulfate and nitrate were
22      4.1 and 2.5 m2/g, respectively.   For a relative humidity of 50 percent, this would yield
23      overall respective light extinction efficiencies for sulfate and nitrate and associated water of
24      8.2 and 5 m2/g.
 25           Trijonis et al.  (1982) investigated the visibility-aerosol relationship in California using
 26      data from 34 locations.  They found that NO2 contributed a rather uniform 7 to 11 percent of
 27      total light extinction (bext) throughout California. Although they were not of  adequate quality
 28      to make definitive statements, the data suggest that nitrates are more important contributors to
 29      bext in northern California, where they may contribute 10 to 40 percent of bext.
 30           In probably the most accurate assessment of the role of nitrate, Appel et al. (1985)
 31      studied the relationship between light extinction and aerosol composition using empirical data
         August 1991
11-25
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
31
 from three California cities: San Jose, Riverside, and Los Angeles.  Multiple linear
 regression was used to relate aerosol concentrations to measured light extinction.  Emphasis
 was placed in the study on minimizing the sampling artifacts that may have caused substantial
 errors in previous studies.  A linear regression equation that related concentrations of aerosol
 species and NO2 to measured bext provided a very good fit (r = 0.96), with average
 agreement within 6 percent. The regression coefficient for fine particle nitrate was found to
 be higher than in other studies.  The coefficient, interpreted as the light extinction efficiency
 of nitrate and associated water, was 6.3(1 + /*) m2/g, where /* is the relative humidity as
 defined previously.  Using the average humidity of 46 percent measured during the sampling
 yields a nitrate light extinction efficiency of 9.4 m2/g. The average sulfate extinction
 efficiency was comparable:  8.6 m2/g for the average humidity of the sampling period.
 Nitrate aerosol, on average, contributed 36 percent of total light extinction in these three
 cities; NO2 contributed 8 percent.                                            -
      The contributions of various aerosol constituents to total light extinction at two locations
 in the Los Angeles area in 1980 were estimated by Pratsinis et al. (1984).  Particulate nitrate
 aerosol contributed 4  and 1 percent and NO2 contributed 7 and 6 percent of the light
 extinction in Lennox and Duarte, respectively.  The contributions of the NOX species were
 considerably less than those from sulfate (31 to 53 percent), organics (13 to 23 percent), and
 elemental carbon (14  to 21 percent).  Gray et al. (1984) determined that nitrate aerosol
 contributed 13 percent of the light extinction in downtown Los Angeles in 1982.

 11.5.2  Urban Areas in the Western United States
     Outside of California, the most significant urban hazes that have been shown to be
 associated with NOX occurred in the winter in Denver and  Phoenix.  Nitrogen oxides, both
 NO2 and nitrate aerosol, were found to be significant contributors to the winter haze in
 Denver (Groblicki et al., 1981; Lewis et al., 1986). Multivariate statistical analysis
 (regression) was used  to analyze the relationships between light scattering and absorption and
 concentrations of particles and gases measured on 41 consecutive  days in November and
December 1978.  Most of the light extinction was found to be caused by particles < 2.5
in diameter.  Elemental carbon (soot) was found to be the most significant contributor,
accounting for 37 percent of light extinction above natural Rayleigh background.  Sulfate
       August 1991
                                         11-26
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     (and associated water) was found to contribute 20 percent, nitrate (and associated water)
 2     17 percent, and organic carbon 13 percent; the remaining fine particle matter contributed
 3     7 percent, and NO2 contributed 6 percent. All measurements were based on a wavelength of
 4     light of 0.475 jwm (Hasan and Dzubay, 1983). The contribution of NO2 would have been
 5     larger at the blue end of the visible spectrum.  If the contribution of nitrate and NO2 are
 6     combined, the total NCL contribution to Denver winter haze is 23 percent, second only to the
                             •"•-•',              "                     L
 7     contribution of elemental carbon.  Wolff et al. (1981) determined the emission source
 8     contributions to the Denver winter haze.  Of the total NOX contribution to the winter haze of
 9     23 percent, combustion of natural gas, oil, and coal (in power plants and boilers) accounted
10     for more than half (14  percent), while automotive contributions were the largest part of the
11     remainder (9 percent).   Hasan and Dzubay (1983) developed estimates of light extinction
12     efficiency of various aerosol components of the 1978 Denver winter haze using both
13     regression analysis and Mie scattering theory  based on measured particle size distributions.
                                                                                      r\
14     For ammonium nitrate aerosol, regression gave a scattering efficiency of 2.4 to 2.5 m /g,
                                                                            r\
15     while theoretical calculations yielded a scattering efficiency of 3.7 to 3.8 m  /g.
16          Solomon and Moyers (1984) studied the contributors to light extinction in Phoenix,
17     Arizona,.during January 1983, when winter hazes were observed.  Elemental carbon was by
18     far,the largest contributor to light extinction,  at 41 percent of bext, on the average.
19     Approximately equal contributions resulted from nitrate (15 percent), organic carbon
20     (15 percent), and sulfate (13 percent).  The contribution from NO2 averaged 3.2 percent.
21     Solomon and Moyers (1986) reported that the fine nitrate aerosol measured  in Phoenix in
22     January 1983 was 13.4 percent of the total fine particle mass, comparable to the 12.2 percent
23     contribution of nitrate  found in Denver during November and December 1978 and much
24     higher than the contribution reported in other major metropolitan and rural areas.  They
25     concluded that motor vehicle emissions  accounted for most of the nitrate and other fine
26     particle mass that caused the observed haze.
27           Dzubay et al. (1982)  studied the relationships between visibility and aerosol composition
28     during  summer in Houston, Texas.  Nitrate was found mainly on coarse particles and was
29     determined to be an insignificant (0.5 percent) contributor to the total light  extinction.  It was
30      conjectured that fine nitrate aerosol did not condense because the sulfate was not fully
31      neutralized (i.e., there was  insufficient ammonia to react with HNO3);  and  that HNO3
        August 1991
11-27
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
   7
   8
   9
  10
  11
  12
  13
  14
  15
  16
  17
  18
  19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
31
   condensed on the alkaline coarse particles, which were a significant sink for nitrate. Nitrate
   particle measurement artifacts may also have been a major factor in this study. Nitrogen
   dioxide contributed 4.7 percent of bext.
       Stevens et al.  (1988) reported measurements made during the winter of 1986-1987 in
  Boise, Idaho.  There nitrate aerosol was a significant component of total light extinction,
  contributing 13 percent of the fine particle mass.  Less than 10 percent of the total nitrate was
  left in the vapor phase as nitric acid.   This study represents one of the few good sources of
  fine particle nitrate data; measurements in this study were made using an annular denuder
  followed by Teflon® and nylon filters.

  11.5.3  Urban Areas in the Eastern United States, Europe, and Mexico
       Few studies of the role of nitrate aerosol in visibility impairment have been conducted
  outside of the western United States.  Furthermore, because of the significant problems
  inherent in measuring particulate nitrate (discussed in preceding sections), the studies
  described here may not have accurately measured particulate nitrate concentrations. This
 problem should be kept in mind.  Nitrate aerosol contributions appear to be lower in the
 eastern United States than in California and other western U.S. cities, perhaps because of
 higher sulfate concentrations competing for the available atmospheric ammonia.  Using,
 multiple linear regression techniques, Trijonis and Yuan (1978a) found that nitrate did not
 account for any of the observed light extinction in most of the cities in the northeastern and
 north central United States.  Nitrates accounted for 8 percent of total light extinction in
 Columbus, Ohio. There the light extinction efficiency of nitrate was estimated from
 regression analysis to be in the range of 6 to 9 m2/g.
      Wolff et al. (1982) found that nitrate contributed minimally to light extinction in Detroit
 during July 1981. Fine particle nitrate averaged 0.2 ^g/m3; coarse particle nitrate was
 higher, at 1 /*g/m3.  This was consistent with other measurements made in the eastern United
 States (Ferman et al., 1981), where little nitrate was found in the fine fraction.  Nitrogen
 dioxide contributed 4 percent of bext in the Wolff et al. study (1982).
      Colbeck and Harrison (1984) found significant quantities of nitrate aerosol in northwest
England.  Visibility there was strongly  correlated  with both nitrate and sulfate concentrations.
Diederen et al. (1985) investigated the nature of the haze in western Netherlands during the
       August 1991
                                                 11-28      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
 19
20
21
22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
period 1979 to 1981.  Ammonium nitrate aerosol was found to contribute 35-percent of total
bext, and NO2 to contribute 2 percent.
     Bravo et al.  (1988) found high concentrations of nitrate aerosol and NO2 in Mexico
City (6.4 jug/m3 and 0.07 ppm); however, the contributions of these species to the total light
extinction budget  were relatively small (5 and 2.5 percent) because of the much higher
concentrations of  other aerosol species. Total light extinction was dominated by soot
(31 percent), sulfate (30 percent),  organics (15 percent), and other species (16 percent).

'11.5.4  Modeling Urban Haze Effects
      Russell and  Cass (1986) developed a Lagrangian trajectory model that incorporates
gaseous and aerosol chemistry and aerosol equilibrium.  This model was applied to  a smog
episode in southern California.  Predictions from the model compared well with
measurements of O3,  NO2, HNO3, NH3, PAN, and particulate nitrate.  When the model was
used to investigate alternative control techniques for nitrate aerosol, NOX emission control
was found to produce a nearly proportional (linear) reduction in total nitrate (HNO3 vapor
plus particulate nitrate) and slightly greater than proportional reductions  in particulate nitrate.
 Particulate nitrate concentrations were found to be most effectively reduced by reducing
 ammonia (NH3) emissions, especially from farm-related activities.
      Russell et al.  (1988) developed a grid-based Eulerian airshed model that incorporates a
 chemical reaction mechanism for  gaseous and aerosol species. The model was compared with
 measurements and the model calculations of aerosol nitrate concentrations were found to be in
 good agreement with measurements.
 11.6  ROLE OF NITROGEN OXIDES IN NONURBAN REGIONAL HAZE
      The effects of NOo and nitrate on regional haze outside of urban areas appear to be less
             . • '  -  , /    £•*
 significant than their effects on urban hazes.  Nitrogen oxides may not be significant in these,
 nonurban regional hazes because of low concentrations of nitric acid (HNO3) and ammonia
 (NH3), high ambient temperatures, and low humidities in the West; and because of high
 sulfate concentrations in the East that compete for available,ammonia.
        August 1991
                                          11_29      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
31
 11.6.1  Nonurban Areas of the Western United States
      As noted previously (Section 11.5.3), few studies of the role of nitrate aerosol in
 visibility impairment have been conducted outside of the western United States, r
 Furthermore, because of the significant problems inherent in measuring particulate nitrate
 (discussed in preceding sections), the studies described below may not have accurately
 measured particulate nitrate.             ,                             <
      Macias et al. (1981) found that nitrate made small or negligible contributions to  regional
 haze at one site in Arizona on several monitoring days in the summer and winter of 1979,
 although on one day ammonium nitrate was about 8 percent of the fine particle mass.
      White and Macias (1987) found very low concentrations of nitrate aerosol in the
 nonurban, intermountain West. Measurements of nitrate aerosol concentrations averaged
 0.09 ng/m3. Nitrate was very episodic, however, with major contributions to this average
 arising from a small number of episodes. Higher concentrations were observed in the North
 and at all sites during the winter,  White and Macias (1987) commented that during the   :
 winter the measurements may have underestimated nitrate aerosol concentrations by  as much
 as a factor of three because  of nitrate volatilization from the filters.
      Trijonis et al. (1988) analyzed data collected in the Mohave Desert of California over a
 2-year period, 1983  to 1985, to determine the species contributing to light extinction.  They
 found that for both average and worst-case conditions the  sum of particulate nitrate and NO2
 contributed 13 + 5 percent of bext.                                  .
      Malm et al. (1989) evaluated the contribution of nitrate aerosol,  along with larger
 contributions from sulfate and carbonaceous aerosols, to wintertime visibility impairment in
 the scenic Southwest near Grand Canyon and Canyonlands national parks. Nitrate
 concentrations during January and February 1987 at Grand Canyon averaged 0.1 to
 0.3 jig/m3.  Multiple linear regression analysis suggested that nitrate particles had an average
 scattering efficiency of 4.7 m2/g and contributed 6 to 14 percent of the fine particle  light
extinction during the wintertime study.  Nitrate was generally a much  smaller contributor,
however, to light extinction than sulfates, which contributed 62  to 72 percent of fine particle
extinction,  and organics, which contributed 15 to 16 percent.
       August 1991
                                         11-30      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     11.6.2  Nonurban Areas of the Eastern United States
 2          Mathai and Tombach (1987), in their review of visibility and aerosol measurements in
                                                                                     »•>
 3     the eastern United States, concluded that fine nitrate concentrations averaged 1 jtig/m .  In the
 4     studies they summarized, fine-particle nitrate had been measured for very short (week and
                                                                     ^t
 5     month) periods and concentrations had ranged from 0.-2 to 0.9 jitg/m  .
 6          Wolff and Korsog (1989) found that NO2 (averaging 4 ppb) accounted for less than
 •7 ,•-   1 percent of total light extinction in the Berkshire Mountains of Massachusetts in the summer
 8     of 1984. Sulfate and associated  water caused most (77 percent) of the light extinction.
 9     Nitrate aerosol was not found. The measurements of Vossler et al. (1989)  at Deep Creek
10     Lake in Maryland and of Pierson et al. (1987) in the Allegheny Mountains  were consistent
11   . •  with the Berkshire Mountains study;  NO2 averaged 4 ppb, 'and nitrate aerosol concentrations
12     were very small relative to sulfate.  The latter two studies, unlike the Berkshire study, used
13     the more accurate denuder-nylon filter samples.
14          Dzubay and Clubb (1981) found that for summer conditions in Research Triangle Park,
15     North Carolina (nonurban but near urban areas), NO2 light absorption accounted for only
16     2 percent of total light extinction.  Particle scattering caused most of the light extinction
17     (75 percent), followed by Rayleigh scattering from air (7 percent) and particle light
1,8'     absorption (7 percent).
19 -      ,-  -  .-      -           •       '           •••   '-    • '           •''   -
20     11.6.3  Modeling Regional Haze Effects
21          Latimer et al. (1985a) used a Lagrangian regional visibility model and emission
22:  :   inventories for the southwestern United States to estimate the effects of manmade emission
23     sources on regional visibility in  1980 and  1995.  In this assessment, nitrate aerosol was found
24     to be a potentially significant contributor to the manmade portion of nonurban regional haze.
25     While manmade sulfate sources  were found to be the largest contributors to haze, contributing
26     over half (50 to 60 percent) of the manmade fraction, nitrate was  estimated to be the next
27  "•' largest contributor (10 to 20 percent).  Although manmade organic and elemental carbon
28     contributions to regional haze were found to be small (less than 10 percent of the manmade
29      fraction), biogenic organic aerosol was estimated to be a large contributor  to total light
30      extinction (the sum of natural and manmade fractions).
       . August 1991
11-31
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
      In this modeling study, it was cautioned that the estimates of the contribution of nitrate
 to the manmade total were uncertain because of uncertainties in the relative distribution of the
 nitrate anion (NO^) between the optically inactive nitric acid (HNO3) and the light-scattering
 ammonium nitrate aerosol (NH4NO3).  This uncertainty resulted largely from the uncertainty
 regarding background concentrations of ammonia (NH3), which is essential to the formation
 of ammonium nitrate aerosol.  On the basis of thermodynamic equilibrium considerations, the
 study showed that nitrate aerosol would be most likely to condense in winter and least likely
 in summer. Nitrate aerosol was found to be a significant portion of increases in regional
 haze projected for the period 1980 to 1995. Latimer et al. (1985b, 1986) evaluated the
 performance of this regional visibility model by comparing model calculations with
 particulate, visibility, and wet deposition measurements performed by the U.S. Environmental
 Protection Agency, the National Park Service, and the Electric Power Research Institute.
 This comparison showed that model predictions of sulfate and nitrate concentrations and light
 extinction were relatively unbiased and were highly correlated with actual measurements.
 The average nitrate aerosol concentration predicted by the model was 0.22 /*g/m3,
 approximately 2.4 times the average measured during the Western Regional Air Quality Study
 in 1981 of < 0.1 /ig/m3 that was reported in Tombach et al. (1987) and the'value of
 0.09 Atg/m3 reported by White and Macias (1987).
                           «             '          r
     Latimer et al. (1986) and Latimer (1988c) applied this regional visibility model to  the
 case of winter layered haze observed near the national parks in Utah and Arizona.  An
 average nitrate aerosol concentration of 0.35 /wg/rn3 was predicted.  This value compares
 reasonably well with the average of 0.16 jug/m3 measured  during  a special study in 1986
 (Latimer, i988c) and  the average of 0.38 ^g/m3 measured during the WHITEX experiment
 in 1987 (Malm and Iyer, 1988).  However,  the model underpredicted the observed sulfate
 concentrations by a factor of two to four.  Although considerable  uncertainty exists over the
 accuracy of nitrate measurements (Malm and Gebhard, 1988), nitrate may be a significant
 contributor to winter layered haze (approximately 15 to 25 percent of extinction from
 manmade sources (Malm et al., 1989), even though sulfate appears to be the dominant
contributor,
     Latimer (1988a)  developed a spreadsheet template for calculating the effect of changes
in aerosol species concentration on total light extinction and visibility.  As part of that efforfj
       August 1991
                                        11-32
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
available measurements of particle chemical composition and concentration and visibility or
light extinction were compiled.  Using an assumed nitrate light-scattering efficiency of
8 m2/g, Latimer (1988a) estimated the relative contribution of nitrate to total light extinction
in numerous locations where both aerosol and visibility data were available.  Nitrate generally
contributed less than 10 percent to total extinction, except in Portland, Oregon, where it was
11 to 14 percent; Denver, Colorado, 16 percent; Los Angeles, California, 20 percent; and
Riverside, California, 40 percent. Latimer (1988a) found that measured visual ranges agreed
well with visual  ranges derived from the measured aerosol constituents and their respective
light extinction efficiencies.
11.7  ROLE OF NITROGEN OXIDES IN PLUME VISUAL IMPACT
     Much of the regulatory attention that has been given to visibility during the past decade
has focused on the issue of the visibility impacts of plumes from individual emission sources.
This plume visual impact is commonly called "plume blight" (U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1979). Particularly in areas of pristine background visibility, such as the
intermountain West, the visual impact of plumes such as those from power,plants can be
quite significant as far as 100 km from sources (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
1979;  Latimer, 1979, 1980).  Considerable work has been carried out during the past decade
to develop and evaluate plume visual impact computer models and to develop technical
guidance for plume visual impact evaluation as part of the implementation of U.S. EPA's
visibility regulations under the visibility protection  provisions of the Clean Air Act.   Nitrogen
dioxide has been found to be a significant contributor to plume visual impact from modern,
well-controlled power plants.
      The contrast of  a plume against an optically thick horizon sky background can be
calculated by solving Equation  11-1 .(Latimer et al., 1978;'White et al., 1986):
                                   - exP(-Tplume)] [exp(-bext rp)],
                           (11-8)
        August 1991
                                          11-33
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
31
32
33
34
35
 where
 cplume = contrast of the plume against the horizon sky
 J      = source function defined previouly;
 rplume  = optical thickness of the plume (Jbextdr);                              '
 ^ext    = extinction coefficient of the intervening background atmosphere between the
           plume and the observer; and
 rp      = distance between the plume and the observer.                 ?

      For a pure NO2 plume, the first term (in the first pair of square brackets) equals -1, and
 therefore Cplume is always negative, signifying a dark plume. If one also assumes either that
 the plume is very close to the observer (rp « 0) or that the intervening atmosphere is optically
 thin (bext« 0), then the last term in this equation equals 1,  and  the following equation for an
 NO2 plume is obtained:
Cplume  =  -[
= ~tt ~ exPCf
                                             plume bag
(11-9)
     If one assumes that Cplume must equal at least -0.02 for a plume to be visible, then the
plume optical thickness (rplume) must be at least 0.02.  For a plume that is 1  km wide, this
optical depth can be caused by 0.065 ppm (122 /*g/m3) of NO2 at A = 0.55 ^m or by
0.012 ppm (22 jig/m3) at A = 0.4 pm.  For a plume 10 km wide, the same effect could be
caused by NO2 concentrations one-tenth as large.  Melo and Stevens (1981) found that under
typical conditions a plume NO2 optical thickness corresponding to 90 ppm-km (or 0.090 ppm
in a 1  km wide plume) was required to make a plume just visible against a blue horizon sky
background. Using a predecessor of the PLUVUE models (Johnson et al., 1980;  Seigneur
et al.,  1984),  Latimer (1980) investigated the relationship between NOX emission rates from
power plants and plume contrast and other optical parameters.  He found that the yellow-
brown coloration of the power plant plume was dominated by NO2 for the modeled cases.
Melo and Stevens (1981) confirmed the dominant importance of NO2 to coloration in an
actual power plant plume.  Latimer (1979, 1980) modeled the visual impacts of power plants
of various sizes and NOX emission rates and concluded that yellow-browa plumes could be
observed as far as 100 to 150 km away from a power plant, but only on a few days per year.
     White and Patterson (1981) developed nomographs that allow one to determine the
optical properties and relative importance of emitted particles and NO2 as  a function of the
August 1991                            H_34      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     scattering angle and the particle size distribution. Vanderpol and Humbert (1981) identified
 2     NO2 as the primary plume colorant when particle size was greater than 0.5 jim.  Haas and
 3     Fabrick (1981) performed a sensitivity analysis to investigate the effects of NO2 and particles
 4     in plumes on various indicators of color and contrast.
 5          In studies of a power plant plume in the southwestern United States as part of the
 6     VISTTA project, Richards et al. (1981)  never found paniculate nitrate even though nitric acid
 7     vapor was formed at rates 3 to 10 times the rate at which sulfate aerosol was formed.  They
 8     concluded that nitrate aerosol did not condense because of inadequate background
 9     concentrations of ammonium ion.  Hegg and Hobbs  (1983) measured the constituents of
10     another power-plant plume in the Southwest and found rapid formation of both nitric acid and
11     nitrate aerosol.  Nitrate aerosol constituted 15 to 75 percent of the nitrate in the plume.
12     Measured plume aerosol size was primarily in the 0.25 ^m range.  Approximately equal
13     contributions to plume light extinction were made by particles and NO2. The reason the
14     Hegg and Hobbs (1983) findings were quite different from those of Richards et al.  (1981) is
15     not clear, but the findings may have differed because background ammonia concentrations
16     differed at the respective sites.
17          Also as part of the VISTTA study, Blumenthal et al. (1981) measured the dispersion,
18     chemistry, and optical properties of a coal-fired power plant plume in the Southwest.  On the
19     basis of this measurement program, they concluded that NO2 was the primary plume
20     colorant, that secondary aerosol formation could be neglected within  100 km of the source,
21     and that the PLUVUE model adequately characterized observed effects.  Bergstrom et al.
22     (1981) evaluated the PLUVUE model using VISTTA data and found that the model
23     performed reasonably well, but that it slightly overpredicted observed plume visual impacts.
24     Sensitivity analyses performed indicated that NO2 was the principal plume colorant.
25       =  The most detailed evaluation of plume visibility models was carried out as part of the
26     VISTTA study  (White et al.,  1985, 1986). Four plume visibility models,  including the two
27     versions of PLUVUE (Latimer and Samuelsen, 1975,  1978; Latimer et al., 1978; Johnson
28     et al., 1980; Seigneur et al., 1984), the ERT visibility model (Drivas et al., 1980),
29     PHOENIX (Eltgroth,  1982), and the Los Alamos visibility model (Williams et al. 1980;
30      1981), were evaluated by comparison with field measurements  of plume concentrations,
31     optical parameters, and observed plume color and contrast made at a large power plant in the
        August 1991
11-35
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
27
28
29
30
31
 Southwest, well-controlled for paniculate, and at less well-controlled power plants in the
 Midwest and an uncontrolled smelter in the'Southwest.  Of the four, the first two, the
 PLUVUE and ERT models, were found to be most accurate in predicting the plume visual
 impacts observed in the field measurement programs. The plume contrast for the power plant
 with modern particulate controls could be adequately explained accounting just for the plume
 NO2 concentrations; participates did not play a significant role.  In the study of strong
 particulate emission sources (White et al., 1986), the performance of PLUVUE II and the,
 ERT models was less satisfactory than for the NO2-dominated plumes. However, the
 relatively poor performance of these two models may have resulted in large part from the
 imprecise specification of model inputs (particle size and background sky radiance). Model
 performance was found to depend strongly on model input specification.
11.8  CONTRIBUTIONS OF NITROGEN OXIDES TO THE LIGHT
       EXTINCTION BUDGET
     Trijonis (1987) evaluated the relative contributions of NO2 and nitrate aerosol to
visibility by comparing the light extinction caused by these NOX species to total light
extinction for field studies in which the total light extinction and the chemical composition of
the haze were measured simultaneously.  Tables 11-2 and 11-3 summarize the results for  ,
NO2 and nitrate aerosol,  respectively. The contribution of NO2 to light absorption was
obtained by multiplying the NO2 concentration by its light absorption efficiency at 0.55 jum
(0.33 Mm"1 ppb"1). The relative contribution of NO2 ranged from  < 1 percent of total light
extinction in the rural East to as high as 9 percent in urban areas. Nitrate aerosols generally
contributed less than 10 percent, except in California urban areas and in Denver during the
winter, where the fraction of total light extinction attributable to nitrate was as high as
34 percent.  It should be noted, however, that these estimates may be lower bounds because
of nitrate measurement problems resulting frpm the volatility of sampled nitrates.
     Trijonis (1987) summarized his assessment of the contribution  of the two NOX species
as shown in Table 11-4.
     These estimates may be somewhat high for the rural situations  if nitrate aerosol
concentrations are limited because of low nitric acid and ammonia concentrations,
       August 1991
                                       11-36
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
[
F3
I
O
Q
£
      .lo
ge N02

tration,
Av

Con
               s
               pq
                     00
                     oo
                           co
                              O  O  O
                              cs  o\  cs
                           ON   O\  >/2   O\
                           1-1   cs  •*   cs
                           00
                                          PQ
 August 1991
                                          11-37
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                      •<*  in
                      CO   CO
                      CN   o
                      a   a
                      co  co
                         en
                         en
                      CO  CO
                      CO
                      00
                      o\
                         00
                     .g

                      g
                      w  *i
                      «-«  *c?
                     1

1
                         £

                         8
                         o\
       8
       SJ
SAROADDa

See footnote <
August 1991
              11-38     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------





z
0
g
Ej
n
H
§
H
o
H
^^
rp
H
g
g

p^^
t^
1
S
u
TABLE 11-3. NITRA



a
o «
311-3
£| a s
w 8 <;
&- 1,
§ o "IJ Jj
**d t*^

1 1
LJ_j +•* en
|0"|-|
^ £H
^i O
< o













1
p
i



T^-U^I— i en >— I*— i i— i •<* l> o\
en eN A en <-i <-i ^ ,-( «
A

oo oo oooo [& ^ •-..'•
ooo in o o oo o o
o\ oo 1-1 o\ o --i in . o\ *-< o
fsl ^H (N^ -^H ^H ^H T*H i~H T~1

oo oo oo oo ^: ^ ' .
^^ in oo
S °°- « * * ^ S ^ ^ M A ^ «>
S^A en-HA5 2 cs o
°1'S ^^ '• ' o -2
1 8- If 1 ? '^ ; 8 w ' § | .
i M x • <3 2 wod ^ ^
M^'3 oo S S oi ON S ^-S-
.a . o\ a B*4-5 oo'-i 4s s ' -3 •
to CJ '•^ 'E3 S«N O\ 4-1 -"^ ^2
»rt . i w 4-i w ^   ^« i-y-w
^^r§ S O^*4"1 !> ',g 0 Ctf" § ^
• "!• ' J * J g |l 1 • -a 13 j g f
t 5 1* -9^1^ -g : g -8,1 ^ |
S * ® o" g -°* fe 00 S3. 6 „ 0 fl, «
- 5- f £i g .5 .f &a IP -fS § &
<3j5 ^ Hopsi.d "S, 4-.°^ QIS ,-.SH
1 -3" • 1 111- 1 — 2 1 s s- § -g,,
i^i - 4^ § ***• <3 2 ^ §a>Op3^ g >a3-
- « rf S SP ^(B-S^ !=* ^-S^^'Si
ca 43 >.O8 43 ,PW^S oooo ^jlh-54? O49 QX co «fc! p W'fc
0 : < . '-.. .' Q- ... 0 . Q .
I_)^H c-) enooi-i cN en PI-I eN PM - ^H pqrn

-------






D

2i
H
L(

73
^%
3
3
H
O
H
B
CD
§
13
P

1
u


S
PJ
o
CO
•A
•j<
3
H




o c5*
*— 3 tO >y
gig*
w|


'~i-i ^ «-•
^t K
fji

C5 o
J5 *.g
4) M i-O
CO •§ O«
-1 °











1
Q

i
.2
S








o\





o



o\
d








.S
f --,j »•-*
§ i
^ u2
' 0
1 i
•fi
||
""I* fl
TO o
^J **H
W > 3
O _j °*
S w1^
@ w i
PH 3 "
^ 11
g is
C^ r4
<

o\



CO

o
t— (

co

"1
OJ


CO



.s
"S
1
J
>— 4
ti_J
^
•4-t
a
u
1
.g
to
i

1
c<-i o
w -a
t|
I 1
PH «S
^ 8
 co
CO
°* ~;
»-t CO
*-^ oo
. 0\
^3 S3
o s
>-, 5
CN


ID



CO

o\

CO

°5
o


CO



S
i-<
i
1


!
a
J
M
j
61)
.a
"On

1
1-<
n
t
|
to
£d
S "°
d- S
•3 |
-1
J «
O *"
1^ CO
CO

•* cs
A A





o vi


CO i-l
d d
A A





t
o\
&
T-H


*
1 ^
'^ *a
o S
•S 'a
b 1-1
S ^
o\ la
ta J3 t..
cs
^ A



CO •

0 0
CJ\ O\
t— < t— <


•*
^ d
^ A


to




CO
pi j 8
' "1 CO
55 °
•^ $ d
H S oo
3 o o\
Pn o ^
i i 1
W CD1
^ I S" s i! 1
S3 Si " 5
^ 1 ° 1 § ^
§ ^ !^ 3 1
£ ft "«• 63 J
[T"1 (4-1 CO
F— 1 O ^
S m «S O1
j^i i-Lj

§ ^
?N 05 *5 r- 1 H (D
§ & 5 ii j§ 1
E | §^ i 1 «

A



oo

o
•a

CO
cs
d
A


CO





^
^
1

P
ta
-1
1








t


















FLON FILTERS
m
P
S
1
j<
CO
A





o
: »— i


^
d
A






' 1
'is
J
1
*§

1
.Ox
,"«
-4~*

S
-§
|

° ^
S3 ®
^^
||
§ 2 ^1 J .a 15- <§ 5 2 ^
Q O to f^ ^5
CD ^ -^

O
S $
§ 
-------
O f
H -Z
      00

       
                * &-a ^,
                W £ I co
                                                •S
  August 1991
        11-41
         DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
                 TABLE 11-4. PERCENTAGE CONTRIBUTION OF
               NITROGEN OXIDES TO TOTAL LIGHT EXTINCTION
Location

Metropolitan West
Rural West
Metropolitan East
Rural East
Contribution to Extinction, %
NO2
8 ± 1.5
4 ±2
5 + 1.5
2 + 1.5
Nitrate
15 ± 4
6 ±2 .
5 ± 2
5 ±2 .
Total NOX
> A.
23 ± 4.5 , .
10 + 3 ,
10 ± 2.5
, 7 + 2.5
competition from sulfate for ammonia, and temperatures and humidities that favor the
retention of nitrate in the gas phase.

11.9  SUMMARY OF EFFECTS ON VISIBILITY
     Emissions of NOX can contribute significantly to visibility impairment in the form of
plumes and hazes.  Nitrogen dioxide (NO^ and. ammonium nitrate aerosol (NH4NO3) are the
optically active species of NOX.  Other species, including nitric oxide (NO) and nitric acid
(HNO3), are gases with insignificant optical effects.  Nitrogen dioxide is a gas that
preferentially absorbs blue light, thus tending to cause yellow-brown atmospheric
discoloration.  There is agreement among many studies that NO2 is a strong and consistent
colorant. Aerosols,  however, including nitrate, can cause atmospheric discoloration,
particularly when bright objects are observed or the sun is behind the observer.
     Nitrogen  dioxide has been shown to be the most significant plume colorant for the
yellow-brown power plant plumes that have been observed, primarily in the western United
States, and  that are of current regulatory concern to EPA and the States.
     Nitrogen  dioxide and nitrate aerosol are significant contributors to urban haze,
especially in California and the western United States. Their combined share of total
extinction can be 20  to 40 percent of total light extinction in such urban areas.  In nonurban
areas, NOX  appears to be a relatively small contributor to light extinction because  NO2,
nitrate aerosol,  and ammonia concentrations tend to be lower or because moderate or high
temperatures tend to  prevent nitrate aerosol from condensing. Nitrate aerosol does not appear
       August 1991
                                       11-42
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     in areas of high concentrations of sirlfate, such as the eastern United States, mainly because
 2     acidic sulfate compounds consume the available atmospheric ammonia that is needed to
 3     condense nitrate aerosol from nitric acid vapor.
 .4         ,  Theoretical models have been developed for describing the chemical reactions that result
 5     in the formation of optically active NOX species, aerosol dynamics of nitrate aerosol,
 6     chemical equilibrium of nitrate-water aerosols, the light scattering and absorption properties
 7     as a function of the wavelength of light, and effects on visual range, haze contrasts, and
 8     atmospheric color.  The available comparison of plume visibility models suggests that the
 9     effects of plume NO2 can be accurately predicted but that model predictions of the effects of
10     particles are less adequate. Limited work has been done to develop and test models for
11     urban, layered, and regional haze; but much more work is clearly needed.
12           Measurement of nitrate aerosol is complicated by its volatility.   However, newer
13     measurement techniques based on the use of denuders have provided reliable measurements.
14     Because older techniques (such as Teflon  filters) can seriously underestimate nitrate aerosol
15     concentrations, care must be taken when interpreting data.
16        :   Work is needed to understand the apparently nonlinear effects of NOX emission controls
17     on nitrate aerosol concentrations and resulting visibility effects.  Also, work is needed to
18     understand the effects of SO2 emission controls on nitrate aerosol production, because the
19     large-scale reduction of sulfate, which competes with nitrate for available ammonia, may
20     result in increases in nitrate aerosol.
21
22
23     11.10 ECONOMIC VALUATION OF EFFECTS  ON VISIBILITY FROM
24             NITROGEN OXIDES
25           The primary effects  of NOX on visibility were described in previous sections of this
26     chapter and are believed to be:  (1) discoloration, producing a brownish color seen in plumes,
27     layered hazes, and uniform hazes, and (2) reductions in visual range (increases in light
28     extinction), especially in urban areas in the western United States.  This section discusses the
29     available economic evidence concerning the value of preventing or reducing these types of
30     effects on visibility.  Economic studies have not focused specifically on NOX associated
31     changes in visibility for the most part,  but some studies have  considered the types of visibility
        August 1991
11-43
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1      effects that are associated with NOX.  The following summary of economic estimation
  2      methods and available results is brief.  For more detail see Chestnut and Rowe (1989),
  3      Mitchell and Carson (1989), Hschhoff and Furby (1988), Cummings et al. (1986), and Rowe
  4      and Chestnut (1982).
  5
  6      11.10.1 Basic Concepts of Economic Valuation
  7          Visibility has value to individual economic agents primarily through its impact upon
  8      activities of consumers and producers.  Studies of the economic impact of visibility
  9      degradation by air pollution have focused on consumer activities.  Some commercial
 10      activities, such as airport operations, may be affected by visibility degradation by air
 11      pollution, but available evidence suggests that the economic magnitude of NOX effects on
 12      commercial operations probably is very small.  In a 1985 report, the U.S. Environmental
 13      Protection Agency concluded that only a small percentage of the visibility impairment
 14      incidents sufficient to affect air traffic activity can be attributed primarily to manmade air
 15     pollutants (2% to 12% in summer in the eastern United States);  and according to the
 16     information presented previously in this chapter, NOX would not be expected to be a
 17     significant contributor to these incidents.  Most economic studies of the effects of air
 18     pollution on visibility have, therefore, focused on the aesthetic effects to the individual.
 19          It is well established that people notice those changes in visibility conditions that are
20     significant enough to be perceptible to the human observer, and  that visibility conditions
21      affect the well-being of individuals.  This has been verified in scenic and visual air quality
22     rating studies (Middleton et al., 1983; Latimer et al., 1981; Daniel and Hill, 1987), through
23      the observation that  individuals spend less time at scenic vistas on days with lower visibility
24      (MacFarland et al.,  1983), and through use of attitudinal surveys (Ross et al.,  1987).  The
25      intent of visibility-related economic studies has been to put a dollar value on changes  in well-
26      being associated with visibility degradation.
27          Welfare economics defines a dollar measure of the change in individual well-being
28      (referred to as utility) that results from a change in  the quality of any public good, such as
29      visibility, as the change in income that would cause the same change in well-being as that •
30      caused by the change in the quality of the public good.  One  way of defining this measure of
31      value is to determine the maximum amount the individual would be willing to pay to  obtain
        August 1991
11-44
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     improvements or prevent degradation in the public good (see Freeman, 1979, for more
 2     detail).  For most goods and services traded in markets, this measure can be derived from
 3     analysis of market transactions. For non-market goods, such as visibility, this economic
 4     measure of value must be derived some other way.
 5          For purposes of this discussion, consumer values for changes in visibility can be divided
 6     into use and non-use values (there are slight variations in the way these are defined by
 7     different economists).  Use values are related to the direct influence of visibility on the
 8     current and expected future activities of an individual at a site.  Non-use values are the values
 9     an individual places on protecting visibility  for use  by others (bequest value) and on knowing
10     that it is being protected regardless of current or future use (existence value). Total value,
11     combining use and non-use, is sometimes called preservation value.
12           .                                                              '        "
13     11.10.2  Economic Valuation  Methods for Visibility
14          Two main economic valuation methods have been used to estimate dollar values for
15     changes in visibility conditions in various settings:  (1) the contingent valuation method,  and
16     (2) the hedonic property value method. Both methods have important limitations, and
17     uncertainties  surround the accuracy of available results for visibility.  Ongoing research
18     continues  to address important methodological issues, but at this time some fundamental
19     questions remain unresolved (Chestnut and Rowe, 1989;  Mitchell and Carson, 1989;
20     Fischhoff and Furby, 1988; Cummings et al., 1986).  Recognizing these uncertainties is
21     important; but the body of evidence as a whole suggests that economic values for changes in
22     visibility conditions are probably substantial in many cases and that a  sense of the likely
23     magnitude of these values can be derived in some instances from the available results
24     (Chestnut and Rowe,  1989).
25
26     11.10.2.1  Contingent Valuation Method
27           The contingent valuation method (CVM) involves the use of surveys to elicit values that
28     respondents place on  changes in visibility conditions (see Rowe and Chestnut, 1982; Mitchell
29     and Carson,  1989; Cummings et al., 1986;  for more details on this method). The most
30     common variation of the CVM relies on questions that directly ask respondents to estimate
31     their maximum  willingness to pay (WTP) to obtain or prevent various changes in visibility
        August 1991
11-45
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
31
 conditions.  The potential changes in visibility conditions are usually presented to the
 respondents by means of photographs and verbal descriptions; and some hypothetical payment
 mechanism, such as a general price increase or a utility bill increase, is posed.
      The CVM offers economists the greatest flexibility and potential for estimating use and
 non-use values for visibility.  There are many types of changes in visibility for which total
 values cannot be derived from market data.  As a result, most recent visibility value
 applications use the CVM. This approach continues to be controversial, however, and there
 are those who  question whether the results are useful for policy analysis (Fischhoff and
 Furby, 1988).   Cummings et al. (1986) and Mitchell and Carson (1989) have conducted the
 most comprehensive reviews of the CVM approach to date and have concluded that there is
 sufficient evidence to support the careful use of results from well-designed CVM studies in
 certain applications.
      Among the fundamental issues concerning the application of CVM for estimating
 visibility values are the ability of researchers to present visibility  conditions in a manner
 relevant to respondents and to design instruments that can elicit unbiased values; and the
 ability of respondents to formulate and report values with acceptable accuracy.  As with any
 survey instrument, it is important that the presentation be credible, realistic, and as  simple as
 possible.  The  optimal level of detail and the most critical pieces  of information necessary in
 the presentation to respondents to obtain useful CVM responses continues to be a topic of
 research and discussion. Another important issue in CVM visibility research  concerns the
 ability of respondents to isolate values related to visibility aesthetics from other potential
 benefits of air pollution control such as protection of human health.   Preliminary results
 (Irwin et al., 1990; Carson et al., 1990) suggest that simply telling respondents before asking
 the WTP questions to include only visibility is not adequate and may cause some upward bias
 in the responses.

 11.10.2.2 Hedonic Property Value Method
     The hedonic property value method uses relationships between property values and air
quality conditions  to infer values for differences in air quality (see Rowe and Chestnut, 1982;
and Trijonis et  al., 1984; for more detail on this method).  The approach is used to  determine
the implicit, or "hedonic," price for air quality in a residential housing market based on the
        August 1991
                                         11-46
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     theoretical expectation that differences in property values that are associated with differences
 2     in air quality will reveal how much households are willing to pay for different levels of air
 3     quality in the areas where they live.  The major strength of this approach is that it is that it
 4     uses real market data that reflect what people actually pay to obtain, improvements in air
 5     quality in association with the purchase of their homes.  The method can provide estimates of
 6     use value, but non-use values cannot be estimated with this method..
 7    .      There are  many theoretical and empirical difficulties in applying the hedonic  property
 8     value method for estimating values for changes in visibility, but the most important limitation
 9     is the difficulty  in isolating  values for visibility from other effects of air pollution at the
10     residence. Hedonic property value studies to date provide estimates of total value  for all
11     perceived impacts resulting  from air pollution at the residence, including health, visibility,
12     soiling, and  damage to materials and vegetation. The potential for estimating separate values
13     for visibility with this method is limited for two reasons.  First, the actual effects of air
14     pollution often are highly correlated, making it. difficult to separate them statistically using
15     objective measures.  Second, individuals are likely to perceive a correlation between these
16     effects and to act accordingly in their housing decisions, even if the effects are actually
17     separable using  objective measures.                    ,
18                                               .                            '    ,   '
19     11.10.3  Studies of Economic Valuation of Visibility
20           Economic studies have estimated values for two types of visibility effects  potentially
21     related to NOX:  (1) use and non-use'values for preventing the types of plumes caused by
22     power  plant emissions, visible from recreation areas in the southwestern' United States; and
23      (2) use values of local residents for reducing or preventing increases in urban hazes in several
24     different locations.
25
26      11.10.3.1 Economic Valuation Studies for Air Pollution Plumes
27           Three CVM studies have estimated on-site use values for preventing an air pollution
28   , .. plume  visible from recreation areas in the southwestern United States (Table 11-5).  One of
29,     these studies (Schulze et al.,  1983) also estimated total preservation (use and non-use) values
30      held by visitors and non-visitors for preventing a plume at the Grand Canyon.  A  fourth study
        August 1991
11-47
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
    •w-

Valuatio

method
of value
     o 5

Study Subject
      CO
          «
          &
          •a
            §
Jl'
Sei
          '

          S 3

O
CO
o\
          1 .1
          8 S
          •0 >
      a
      §


         en
         CO
         o\
         73
         •s
         i
                   a
                      8
                     "
                   rt 2
                   m
            B
            p<
|I I
•J3  o! Oj
a  P K

o
GO
0\
                         i

g
-0

'S S3  . - i*
                             S
                   |fi|l|ll
                   o.g ^D^-?-?
                °^ -a
                N S
                •to- a.
                                  •

                                  I
                           §
-«
Is
•5 '-S ,
fl ^
                                      -
                         'S ft'S o
                         o ts •? e
§
ON
ark visitors
                         PH
                         0)



                         •g




                         LLJ en

                         IS
                                           ' c  Q r

                                               l
                         'ca H
                         Q ts
                                            t>
                                            OS
                                            •
                                            I-

                         73
                         •4->

                         
-------
 1      concerning a plume at Mesa Verde National Park (Rae, 1983) was not included because of
                                              i                                 ...
 2      methodological problems with the contingent ranking approach used (Ruud, 1987).  The
 3      plumes in all three studies were illustrated with actual or simulated photographs showing a
 4      dark, thin plume across the sky above scenic landscape features, but specific measures such
 5      as contrast and thickness of the plume were not reported.  Respondents were told that the
 6      source of the plume was a power plant or an unspecified air pollution source. In one study
 7      (Brookshire et al., 1976), a power plant was visible in the photographs.
 8           The estimated on-site use values for the prevention or elimination of the plume ranged
 9      from about $3 to $6 (1989 dollars) per day per visitor-party at the park.  These value
10     estimates are comparable to  values obtained in these and other studies for preventing fairly
11      significant reductions in visual range caused by haze at parks and recreation areas in the
12     Southwest.  A potential problem common to all of these studies is the use of daily entrance
13     fees as a payment vehicle.  Respondents  may, have anchored on the then-typical $2 per day
14     fee and stated an acceptable proportional increase in entrance fees rather than reporting a
15     maximum WTP.  This may have caused  some downward bias in the responses, but empirical
16     exploration of this question  is needed.  An alternative payment vehicle to consider might be
17     total expenditures for the trip to the park.
18           The results of the Schulze et al. (1983) study  suggest that on-site use values may be
19     easily dwarfed by total preservation values held by  the entire population.  For example, with
20     average annual visitation at the Grand Canyon of about 1.3 million visitor-parties (about
21     3 people per party), annual on-site use values for preventing a visible plume every day would
22     be about $8 million based on the Schulze et al. results, while the implied preservation value
23      for preventing a visible plume  most days' (the exact frequency was not specified) at the Grand
24      Canyon would be about $5.7 billion each year when applied to the total United States
25      population.  There is, however, considerable uncertainty in the preservation value estimates
26      from this study.  Chestnut and Rowe (1990)  found that the Schulze et  al. (1983) estimates for
27      haze at national parks in the Southwest are probably overstated by a factor of two or three
 28      and the same probably applies to the plume estimates.
 29
 30                                     •.;'-                        '.
        August 1991'
11-49
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
26
27
28
29
30
  11.10.3.2  Economic Valuation Studies for Urban Haze
      Six economic studies concerning urban haze caused by air pollution are summarized in
  Table 11-6.  Five of these are CVM studies and one is a hedonic property value study.
  Although many other hedonic property value studies concerning air quality have been
  conducted (see Trijonis et al., 1984; and Rowe and Chestnut, 1982; for reviews), this
  California study (Trijonis et al., 1984) is the only one that has used visibility as the measure
  of air quality.
      The magnitudes of the changes in visual range considered in each study vary, making  .
 direct comparisons of the results difficult.  In Table 11-6 implicit values obtained for a
  10 percent change in visual range are reported to allow a comparison of results across the
 studies.  These estimates  are based on an assumption that economic values are proportional to
 the percentage change in  visual range.  All of these studies relied on not. exactly random, but
 more or less representative samples of residents in each of the selected urban areas.  A range
 of socioeconomic characteristics and of neighborhood pollution levels was included in each
 sample.
      The first five studies in Table 11-6 all focused on changes in urban hazes with fairly
 uniform features that can  be described as changes in visual range. The sixth study (Irwin
 et al., 1990) focused on visual air quality in Denver, where a distinct edge to the haze is
 often noticeable,  making visual range a less useful descriptive measure because it would vary
 depending on the viewpoint of the individual and whether the target was in or above the haze
 layer. The studies conducted in Denver and in the California cities are the most relevant  '
 because hazes in these cities are likely to have a higher NOX  component than in the eastern.
 cities; but none of these studies focused specifically on NOX.
      The California studies in Los Angeles and San Francisco provide some interesting
 comparisons because two different estimation techniques were applied for the same locations.
 Property value results for  both cities were found to be higher than comparable values
 obtained in the CVM studies, although Graves et al.  (1988) have reported that subsequent
analysis of the property value data revealed that the WTP estimates are more variable than
the original results suggest.  The higher property value results are expected because those
results are likely to reflect concern about health as well as aesthetic effects of air pollution.
       August 1991
                                         11-50      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                 O
                 o
                 oo

B
                  00
                           o5
                           60
ON



OO
                                   00
             g
             I

1
CO
1
1

CM
CM
T-H
•6O-
Light extinction based
on airport .visibility
data



1
&
_y
O D

ffl ^
ON
OO
S
w
•i
60
! "





*' 3 ' ' '
1
1
1
T— 1
«*
3
OO

CO
&!!
•§ £^-!3
.•I|l! -
&|S1*
• -d 3 rt — S :
M '« 5 is a
G.'P £ £ &
1
"j*j CO 5? Ctf
^ S S te
.j^ t|"^ .juj p^
J J
1 s
1 ^
1 §fl »
ll
OH
U "Q
CM
oo

Q *^H
o - •> - ^ S
1 w> ^ a ,2 -9 „ 'd" g
.| J | ^ 1 U J J
T-H
1 ^
U ' -w
o
s >^»
 § 0 0
ca .s eo «j
•S'^H
a) .-is s?l S ^
w>r3 O -1 -&
g WD rt CO ^
_S 'w *^ t-i
O 'P '^ <8 a*
1
8ti
^S s S
1 .a, § 1
fl ^ *-« oo
O VH S^ O
P^ >l*^ ,Q ^^
o o
'is '«
•1 §
g CT1
*i ^
8 E
60 &
9 '
'^ "S
rt o
O H
' U -3
CM
oo
ON
i— (
^
ri
1
oo
ON
1— 1

(U
August 1991
11-51
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
August 1991
                                 11-52     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      Both of the CVM studies in California asked respondents to consider health and visual effects
 2      but used different techniques to have respondents partition the total values.  They found that,
 3      on average,  respondents attributed about one-third to one-half of their total values to aesthetic
 4      visual effects. In spite of many similarities in the approaches used, the CVM results for San
 5      Francisco are notably higher than for Los Angeles when adjusted to a comparable percentage
 6      change in visual range.  One potentially important difference in the presentations was that
 7      Loehman et al. (1981) defined the change in visibility as a change in a frequency, distribution
 8      rather than simply a change in average conditions.  This type of presentation is more realistic
 9      but more complex; and it is unclear how it may affect responses relative to presentation of a
10     change in the average.  It is possible that the distribution presentation might elicit higher
11      WTP responses because it may focus respondents' attention on the reduction in the number of
12     relatively bad days (and on the increase in the number of relatively good days) while the
13     associated change in the average may not appear as significant.  The implied change in
14     average conditions in the Loehman et al.  (1981)  San  Francisco study turned out to be
15     considerably smaller than that presented in the Brookshire  et al. (1982) Los Angeles study,
16     which may  have also resulted in a higher value when adjusted to a comparable size change in
17     average visual range because  of diminishing marginal utility  (i.e., the first incremental
18     improvement is expected to be worth more than  the second).
 19           The results for the uniform urban haze studies in  cities in the eastern United States fall
20     between the respective CVM results  for the California  cities. The changes in visual range
21     presented in these studies were similar to those presented in  the Los Angeles study.  In all of
22      the eastern studies respondents  were simply asked to consider only the visual effects  when
23      answering the WTP questions.  This approach is now considered to be inadequate (Irwin
 24      etal.,  1990; Carson etal., 1990).
 25           Irwin et at.  (1990) have reported preliminary results for the Denver study (Part H,
 26      Table 11-6). The data obtained in this study are being analyzed further and a final report on
 27      the project is expected to be  available in 1991.  Comparison of the results of this study with
 28      those from other studies  is difficult because the  photographs used to illustrate different levels
 29      of air quality were not tied to visual range levels.  Instead, they were rated  on a seven-point
 30     air quality scale by the respondents, who were then  asked their maximum WTP for a one-step
 31     improvement in the scale. This study reports some  important methodological findings.  One
         August 1991
11_53      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
31
 of these is confirmation that simply asking respondents to think only about visibility results in
 higher WTP responses than when respondents are asked to give WTP for the change in air
 quality and then say what portion of that total is attributable to visibility only.  Values for
 health and visibility combined exceeded those for visibility alone (when respondents were
 simply told to think only about visibility).  This may result simply from the effect of budget
 constraints on marginal values (the respondent has less to spend on visibility when he also is
 buyingihealth); however, the authors express the concern that some, but not all, of the value
 for health may be included in the response for visibility.   They recommend that respondents
 be asked  to give total values for changes in urban air quality  and then be asked to say what
 portion is for visibility.

 11.10.4  Conclusions
      The current reliance on and continuing methodological uncertainties in the contingent
 valuation method for obtaining economic estimates related to  changes in visibility means
 future methodological research related to CVM may provide important information relevant
 to interpreting previous and designing  new visibility value studies using CVM.  Some
 evidence is beginning to emerge as to those factors in CVM applications that appear to have  ,
 the most effect on visibility value estimates and  that, therefore, need to receive more
 attention.  Among these factors are:
      1.  The treatment of related air pollution effects such as health;
      2.  The geographic location of the impact;
      3.  Whether values are obtained in  a single or multiple good context, and are
         appropriately adjusted for non-visibility components;
      4. Whether a frequency distribution presentation of visibility is used;
      5. Various features of the hypothetical context of the WTP questions; and
      6. Survey implementation and data handling procedures.
      Available estimates of economic values for plumes are directly applicable for only a
thin,  dark plume present on most days in the sky at Grand Canyon National Park, and
possibly at a few other national parks in the Southwest.  There is little empirical evidence
(from economics studies to date) about how the values would  vary with the  frequency,
location, or visual characteristics of a plume.  Available results do suggest the potential
        August 1991
                                         11-54
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      importance of considering total preservation values, rather than only on-site use values, in
 2      any assessment of the economic impact of NOX plumes visible from major recreation areas.
 3           The best economic information available for visibility effects associated with NOX is for
 4      on-site use values related to changes in visual range in urban areas caused by uniform haze.
 5      These values fall roughly between $10 and $100 per year per local household for a 10 percent
 6      change in visual range in major urban areas in California and throughout the eastern
 7      United States. Reasonable extrapolations of on-site use values (with an order-of-magnitude
 8      range of uncertainty)  could be made from these studies for estimates of changes in visual
 9      range that are attributable to changes in NOX levels in these and other major urban areas,
10     where NO  contributes to uniform haze that can be characterized by changes in visual range.
                 X
11      Extrapolations to less urbanized areas and/or to other visibility changes would require
12     additional assumptions and might introduce additional uncertainty.  Because each of the
13     studies completed to date has some important weaknesses and limitations, it would be
14     desirable to. continue  to enhance the geographic extent and the technical breadth of issues
15     addressed in these studies to arrive at a broader and more defensible set of estimates.
16     Available results with regard to visual range in urban areas, however, appear to be sufficient
17     to determine the importance of visibility values (on-site use) related to NOx-caused uniform
18     haze in urban areas relative to other potential benefits of NOX controls and to provide order-
 19     of-magnitude estimates of such visibility values.  To do so would require estimates of the
20     changes in visual range that might be expected as a result of NOX controls.
21           Very little work has been done  regarding layered hazes in recreation or residential
22      settings.  The work conducted in Denver (Irwin et al., 1990) is the only study in this
 23      category.  More information is needed about what visual characteristics of such hazes are
 24      most important to viewers, as well as on the value people may place on reducing or
 25      preventing them. A related question that is relevant for NOX, but that has not been addressed
 26      in economic studies to date, is the effect of variations in air pollution color (in plumes or
 27      hazes) on visibility values. In order  to apply available economic values for changes in
 28      layered hazes to changes in NOX levels, a link would need to be made between NOX levels
 29      (and changes that might result from control efforts) and visual characteristics of layered hazes
 30     that can be tied to the economic values.
         August 1991
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1     REFERENCES
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
  10
  11
  12
  13
  14
  15
  16
  17
  18
  19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
51
52
53
  Ahlquist, N. C.; Charlson, R. J. (1969) Measurement of the wavelength dependence of atmospheric extinction
         due to scatter. Atmos. Environ. 3: 551-564.


  Allegrini, I.; De Santis, F. (1989) Measurement of atmospheric pollutants relevant to dry acid deposition  Crit
         Rev. Anal. Chem. 21: 237-255.


  Appel, B. R.; Tokiwa, Y.; Haik, M. (1981) Sampling of nitrates in ambient air. Atmos. Environ. 15: 283-289.


  Appel, B. R.; Tokiwa, Y.; Hsu, J.; Kothny, E. L.; Hahn, E.; Wesolowski, J. J.  (1983) Visibility reduction as
         related to aerosol constituents. Sacramento, CA:  State of California, Air Resources Board; report no
         CA/DOH/AIHL/SP-29. Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB84-243617.


 Appel, B. R.; Tokiwa, Y.; Hsu, J.; Kothny, E. L.; Hahn, E. (1985) Visibility as related to atmospheric aerosol
        constituents. Atmos. Environ.  19: 1525-1534.


 Bergstrom,  R. W. (1973) Extinktions- und Absorptionskoeffizienten des atmosphaerischen Aerosols als Funktion
        der Teilchengroesse [Extinction and absorption coefficients of the atmospheric aerosol as a function of
        particle size]. Beitr. Phys. Atmos. 46: 223-234.


 Bergstrom,  R. W.; Seigneur, C.; Babson, B. L.; Holman, H.-Y.; Wojcik, M. A.  (1981) Comparison of the
        observed and predicted visual effects caused by power plant plumes. Atmos. Environ.  15: 2135-2150.


 Blumenthal, D. L.; Richards, L. W.; Macias, E. S.; Bergstrom, R. W.; Wilson, W. E.; Bhardwaja, P. S.  (1981)
        Effects of a coal-fired power plant and other sources on southwestern visibility (interim summary of
        EPA's project VISTTA). In: White, W.  H.; Moore, D. J.; Lodge, J. P., Jr., eds. Plumes and visibility:
        measurements and model components, proceedings of the symposium; November 1980; Grand  Canyon
        National Park,  AZ. Atmos.  Environ. 15: 1955-1969.


 Bravo, A. H.; Saavedra, R. M. I.; Torres, J. R.; Lomas, A. G.; Nava, T. D.; Tirade, S. D. (1988) Particulate
        carbon, a significant contributor to the visibility reduction of Mexico City. Geofis. Int. 27: 241-261.


 Brookshire,  D. S.; Ives, B. C.; Schulze, W. D. (1976) The valuation of aesthetic preference.  J. Environ  Econ
        Manage. 3: 325-346.


 Brookshire,  D. S.; Thayer, M. A.; Schulze, W.  D.; d'Arge, R. C. (1982) Valuing public goods: a comparison
        of survey and hedonic approaches. Am. Econ. Rev. 72: 65-83.


 Cadle, S. H. (1985) Seasonal variations in nitric acid, nitrate, strong aerosol acidity, and ammonia in an urban
        area. Atmos.  Environ. 19: 181-188.


 Cadle, S. H.; Dasch,  J. M.; Mulawa, P. A. (1985) Atmospheric concentrations and the deposition velocity  to
       snow of nitric acid, sulfur dioxide and various particulate species. Atmos. Environ.  19: 1819-1827.


 Carson, R. T.; Mitchell, R. C.; Ruud,  P. A. (1990) Valuing air quality improvements: simulating a hedonic
       equation in the context of a contingent valuation scenario. In: Mathai, C. V., ed. Visibility and fine
       particles: an AWMA/EPA international specialty conference; October 1989; Estes Park, CO. Pittsburgh,
       PA:  Air and Waste Management Association; pp.  639-646. (AWMA transactions series no. TR-17).


Cass, G. R.  (1979) On the relationship between sulfate air quality and visibility with examples in Los Angeles
       Atmos. Environ. 13: 1069-1084.


Chandrasekhar, S. (1960) Radiative transfer. Dover, NY:
         August 1991
                                                11-56       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18-
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
 51
 52
 53
 54
Charlson, R. J.; Ahlquist, N. C. (1969) Brown haze: NO2 or aerosol? Atmos. Environ. 3: 653-656.


Charlson, R. J.; Covert, D. S.; Tokiwa, Y.; Mueller, P. K. (1972) Multiwavelength nephelometer measurements
       in Los Angeles smog aerosol: III. comparison to light extinction by NO2. In: Hidy, G. M., ed. Aerosols
       and atmospheric chemistry: the Kendall award symposium at the proceedings of the American Chemical
       Society; March-April 1971; Los Angeles, CA. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.; pp. 333-338.


Chestnut, L. G.; Rowe, R. D. (1989) Economic valuation of changes in visibility: a state of the science
       assessment for NAPAP. In: National acid precipitation assessment program: methods for valuing acidic
       deposition and air pollution effects. Washington, DC: National  Acid  Precipitation Assessment Program;

       SOS/T report no. 27.

Chestnut, L. G.; Rowe, R. D. (1990) Preservation values for visibility in the national parks. Washington, DC:
       U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Colbeck, I.; Harrison, R. M. (1984) Ozone-secondary aerosol-visibility relationships in north-west England. Sci.

       Total Environ. 34: 87-100.

Cornsweet, T. N. (1970) Factors other than wavelength that influence hue. In: Visual perception. New York,
       NY: Academic Press, Inc.; pp. 236-240.

Cummings, R. G.; Brookshire, D. S.; Schulze, W. D., eds.  (1986) Valuing  environmental goods: an assessment
       of the contingent valuation method. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and  Allanheld.

Daniel, T. C.; Hill, A. C. (1987) Measuring visibility values: comparison of perceptual assessment methods. In:
       ' Bhardwaja, P.  S.,  ed. Visibility protection: research  and policy aspects. Pittsburgh, PA:  Air Pollution

        Control Association.

Diederen, H. S. M. A.; Guicherit, R.; Hollander, J. C. T. (1985) Visibility reduction by air pollution in The
        Netherlands. Atmos. Environ. 19: 377-383.

 Dixon, J. K. (1940) The absorption coefficient of nitrogen dioxide in the visible spectrum. J. Chem. Phys. 8:
        157-160.

 Drivas, P. J.; Machiraju, S.; Heinold, D. W. (1980) ERT visibility model:  version 3, technical description and
        user's guide.  Concord, MA: Environmental Research & Technology.

 Dunwoody, C. L. (1986) Rapid nitrate loss from PM10 filters. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 36: 817-818.


 Dzubay, T. G.; Clubb, K. W. (1981) Comparison of telephotometer measurements of extinction coefficients with
        scattering and absorption coefficients. In: White, W. H.; Moore, D. J.; Lodge, J. P., Jr., eds. Plumes
        and visibility: measurements and model components, proceedings of the symposium; November 1980;
        Grand Canyon National Park, AZ. Atmos. Environ. 15: 2617-2624.


 Dzubay, T. G.; Stevens, R. K.;  Lewis, C. W.; Hern,  D.  H.; Courtney, W. J.; Tesch, J. W.; Mason, M. A.
        (1982) Visibility and aerosol composition in Houston, Texas. Environ. Sci. Technol.  16: 514-525.


 Eltgroth, M. W. (1982) A comparison of measured absolute plume intensities versus predictions by the
        PHOENIX and PLUVUE models. Austin, TX: Radian Corporation; Radian document no.
         141-485-2-047.

 Ferman, M. A.; Wolff, G. T.; Kelly, N, A. (1981) The nature and sources of haze in the Shenandoah
         Valley/Blue Ridge Mountains area. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 31: 1074-1082.
          August 1991
                                                   11-57
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
48
49
50
 Finlan, J. M. (1981) Scattering of light and the color of atmospheric hazes. In: White, W. H.; Moore, D. J.;
        Lodge, J. P., Jr., eds. Plumes and visibility: measurements and model components, proceedings of the
        symposium; November 1980; Grand Canyon National Park, AZ. Atmos. Environ. 15: 2599-2616.


 Fischhoff, B.; Furby, L. (1988) Measuring values: a conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with
        special reference to contingent valuation of visibility. J. Risk Uncertainty 1: 147-184.


 Freeman, A. M., HI. (1979) The benefits of environmental improvement: theory and practice. Baltimore, MD:
        The Johns Hopkins University Press.


 Graves, P.; Murdoch, J. C.; Thayer, M. A.; Waldman, D. (1988) The robustness of hedonic price estimation:
        urban air quality. Land Econ. 64: 220-233.


 Gray, H. A.;  Cass, G. R.; Huntzicker, J. J.; Heyerdahl, E. K.; Rau, J. A.  (1984) Elemental and organic carbon
        particle concentrations: a long-term perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 36:  17-25.


 Groblicki, P. J.; Wolff, G. T.; Countess, R. J. (1981) Visibility-reducing species in the Denver "brown cloud"—
        L relationships between extinction and chemical composition. In: White, W. H.; Moore, D. J.; Lodge,
        J. P.,  Jr., eds. Plumes and visibility: measurements and model components, proceedings of the
        symposium; November 1980; Grand Canyon National Park, AZ. Atmos. Environ. 15: 2473-2484.


 Haas, P. J.; Fabrick, A. J. (1981) The effects of NO2-aerosol interaction on indices of perceived visibility
        impairment. Atmos. Environ. 15: 2171-2177.


 Hasan, H.; Dzubay, T. G. (1983)  Apportioning light extinction coefficients to chemical species in atmospheric
        aerosol. Atmos. Environ. 17: 1573-1581.


 Hegg, D. A.;  Hobbs, P. V. (1983) Particles and trace gases in the plume from a modern coal-fired  power plant
        in the  western United States and their effects on light extinction. Atmos.  Environ. 17: 357-368.


 Hodkinson, J.  R. (1966) Calculations of colour and visibility in urban atmospheres polluted by gaseous NO2. Int
       J. Air  Water Pollut. 10: 137-144.


 Horvath, H. (1971)  On the brown  colour of atmospheric haze.  Atmos. Environ. 5: 333-344.


 Husar, R. B.;  White, W. H. (1976) On the color of the Los Angeles smog. Atmos. Environ. 10:  199-204.


 Invin, J.; Schenk, D.; McClelland, G. H.;  Schulze, W. D.; Stewart, T.; Thayer, M. (1990) Urban  visibility:
       some experiments on the contingent valuation method. In: Mathai, C. V., ed. Visibility and fine
       particles: an AWMA/EPA  international specialty conference; October 1989; Estes Park, CO. Pittsburgh,
       PA: Air and Waste Management Association;  pp. 647-658. (AWMA transactions series no. TR-17).


John, W. (1986) A new method for nitric acid and nitrate aerosol measurement using the dichotomous sampler.
       Sacramento,  CA: California Air Resources Board; GARB document n'o. CA/DOH/AIHL/R-304.


John, W.; Wall, S. M.; Ondo, J. L. (1985) Dry acid deposition on materials and vegetation: concentrations in
       ambient air.  Berkeley,  CA: California Department of Health Services, Air and  Industrial Hygiene
       Laboratory; report no. CA/DOH/AIHL/SP-34.
         August 1991
                                                11-58
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
 51
 52
 53
 54
Johnson  R. W. (1981) Daytime visibility and nephelometer measurements related to its determination. In: White,
       W H • Moore D  J.; Lodge, J. P., Jr., eds. Plumes and visibility: measurements and model
       components, proceedings of the symposium; November 1980; Grand Canyon National Park, AZ. Atmos.

       Environ. 15: 1835-1845.

Johnson, C. D.; Latimer, D. A.; Bergstrom, R. W.; Hogo, H. (1980) User's manual for the plume visibility
       model (PLUVUE). Research Triangle Park, NC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air
       Quality Planning and Standards; EPA report no. EPA-450/4-80-032. Available from: NTIS, Springfield,

       VA; PB81-163297.

Kerker, M. (1969) The scattering of light and other electromagnetic radiation. New York, NY: Academic Press,
       ' Inc.  (Loebl, E. M., ed. Physical chemistry: a series of monographs, no.  16).

Koschmieder, H.  (1924) Theorie der horizontalen Sichtweite II: Kontrast und Sichtweite [Theory of horizontal
       visibility]. Beitr. Phys. Atmos.  12: 171-181.

Latimer, D. A. (1979) Power plant,impacts on air quality and visibility: siting and emission control implications.
        Washington, DC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Planning and Evaluation; EPA
        publication no. EPA-230/11-79-001. Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB80-123516.


Latimer, D. A. (1980) Power plant impacts on visibility in the West: siting and  emissions control implications.
        J. Air Pollut.  Control Assoc. 30: 142-146.

 Latimer, D. A. (1988a) Assessing the effects of changes in aerosol concentrations on seasonal and annual visual
        range. San Rafael, .CA: Gaia Associates.

 Latimer D A (1988b) Plume perceptibility thresholds. Presented at: 81st annual meeting of the Air Pollution
        Control Association; June; Dallas, TX. Pittsburgh, PA: Air Pollution Control Association; paper no.

        88-56.6.

 Latimer, D. A. (1988c) Application of disperion models for layered haze source apportionment. Presented at:
         81st annual meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association; June; Dallas, TX. Pittsburgh, PA: Air
        Pollution Control Association; paper no. 88-52.6.

 Latimer, D. A.;  Ireson, R. G. (1980)  Workbook for estimating visibility impairment. Research Triangle Park,
         NC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; EPA
         publication no.  EPA-450/4-80-031. Available from: NTIS, Springfield,  VA; PB81-157885.


 Latimer  D. A.;  Ireson, R. G. (1988) Workbook for plume visual impact screening and analysis. Research
        /Triangle Park, NC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and
         Standards; EPA report no. EPA-450/4-88-015.                                  •>

 Latimer, D. A.; Samuelsen, G. S. (1975) Visual impact of plumes from power  plants. Irvine, CA: University of
         California, School of Engineering, Air Quality Laboratory; publication  no. UCI-ARTR-75-3.

  Latimer, D. A.; Samuelsen, G. S. (1978) Visual impact of plumes from power  plants: a theoretical model.
         Atmos. Environ. 12:  1455-1465.

  Latimer, D. A.; Bergstrom, R. W.; Hayes,  S. R.; Liu, M.-K.; Seinfeld, J. H.; Whiten, G. Z.; Wojcik, M.  A.;
         Hillyer  M. J.  (1978) The development of mathematical models for the prediction of anthropogenic
         visibility impairment: volumes I-III. Research Triangle Park, NC: U. S. Environmental Protection
         Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; EPA report no. EPA-450/3-78-1 lOa-c. Available
         from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB-293118-SET.
          August 1991
                                                   11_59       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
  10
  11
  12
  13
  14
  15
  16
  17
  18
  19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
51
52
53
  Latimer, D. A.; Hogo, H.; Daniel, T. C. (1981) The effects of atmospheric optical conditions on perceived
         scenic beauty. Atmos. Environ. 15:  1865-1874.


  Latimer, D. A.; Hogo, H.; Chinkin, L. R.; Dudik, M. C.; Ireson, R. G.; Irpan, P.; Jacobson, H.; Killus, J. P.;
         Lundberg, G. W.; Saxena, P.; Whitten, G. Z.; Yocke, M. A. (1985a) Modeling regional haze in the
         Southwest: a preliminary assessment of source contributions,  volume 1 [revised draft report]. San Rafael,
         CA: Systems Applications, Inc.; chps. 4 and 5; SAI report no. SYSAPP/85-038.


  Latimer, D. A.; Chinkin, L. R.; Dudik, M. C.; Hogo, H.; Ireson, R. G. (1985b) Uncertainties associated with
         modeling regional haze in the Southwest. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute, Health and
         Environmental Sciences Department, API publication no. 4403.


  Latimer, D. A.; Gery, M. W.; Hogo, H. (1986) A theoretical evaluation of the role of nighttime nitrate
         formation in the formation of layered haze. San Rafael, CA: Systems Applications, Inc.; SAI document
         no. SYSAPP-86-167.


 Lewis, C. W.; Baumgardner, R. E.; Stevens, R.  K.; Russwurm, G. M. (1986) Receptor modeling study  of
         Denver winter haze. Environ.  Sci. Technol. 20: 1126-1136.


 Loehman, E.; Boldt, D.; Chaikin, K. (1981) Measuring the benefits of air quality improvements in the San
        Francisco Bay area. Washington, DC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.


 MacFarland, K. K.; Malm, W.; Molenar, J.  (1983) An examination of methodologies and social indicators for
        assessing the value of visibility. la: Rowe, R. D.; Chestnut, L. G., eds. Managing air quality and scenic
        resources at national parks and wilderness areas. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.


 Macias, E. S.; Zwicker, J. O.; Ouimette, J. R.; Hering, S. V.; Friedlander, S. K.; Cahill, T. A.; Kuhlmey,
        G. A.; Richards, L. W. (1981) Regional haze case studies in the southwestern U.S.— I. aerosol chemical
        composition. In: White, W. H.; Moore, D. J.; Lodge, J. P., Jr., eds. Plumes and visibility:
        measurements and model components, proceedings of the symposium; November 1980; Grand Canyon
        National Park, AZ. Atmos. Environ. 15:  1971-1986.


 Malm, W. C.; Gebhard, K. A. (1988) Optical characteristics of aerosols at three national parks. Presented at:
        81st annual meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association;  June; Dallas, TX. Pittsburgh, PA: Air
        Pollution Control Association; paper no. 88-52.2.


 Malm, W. C.; Iyer, H. K. (1988) Examination of the relationship between Navajo Generating Station emissions
        and aerosol concentrations at Page, Arizona. Presented at: 81st annual meeting of the Air Pollution
        Control Association; June; Dallas, TX.  Pittsburgh, PA: Air Pollution Control Association; paper no
        88-52.4.


 Malm, W.; Gebhard, K.; Cahill, T.; Eldred, R.; Pielke, R.; Watson, J.; Latimer, D. (1989) Winter haze
        intensive experiment: draft final report.  Fort Collins, CO: National Park Service.


 Mamane, Y.; Dzubay, T. G. (1986) Characteristics of individual particles at a rural site in the eastern United
        States. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 36: 906-911.


Mamane, Y.; Mehler,  M. (1987)  On the nature of nitrate particles in a coastal urban area. Atmos. Environ 21-
        1989-1994.                                                                               '   '


Mathai, C. V.; Tombach, I. H. (1987) A critical assessment of atmospheric visibility and aerosol measurements
       in the eastern United States. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 37: 700-707.
         August 1991
                                                 11-60      DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24  .
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Melo, O. T.; Stevens, R. D. S. (1981) The occurrence and nature of brown plumes in Ontario. Atmos. Environ.

       15: 2521-2529.

Middleton, W. E. K. (1952) Vision through the atmosphere. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.


Middleton, P.; Stewart, T. R.; Dennis, R. L. (1983) Modeling human judgments of'urban visual air quality.
       Atmos. Environ. 17: 1015-1021.


Milford, J. B.; Davidson, C. I. (1987) The sizes of participate sulfate and nitrate in the atmosphere—a review.
        J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 37: 125-134.


Mitchell, R. C.;  Carson, R. T. (1989) Using surveys to value public goods:  the contingent valuation method.
       Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.


Mulawa, P. A.; Cadle, S. H. (1985) A comparison of nitric acid and particulate nitrate measurements  by the
       penetration and demider difference methods. Atmos. Environ. 19:  1317-1324.


Orel, A. E.; Seinfeld, J. H. (1977) Nitrate formation in atmospheric aerosols. Environ. Sci Technol'.  11:
       1000-1007.


Pierson, W. R.;  Brachaczek, W. W.; Gorse, R. A., Jr.; Japar, S. M.; Norbeck, J. M.; Keeler, G. J.  (1987)
       Acid rain and atmospheric chemistry at Allegheny Mountain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 21: 679-691.


Pratsinis,  S.; Ellis, E. C.; Novakov, T.; Friedlander, S. K. (1984) The carbon containing component  of the Los
       Angeles aerosol: source apportionment and contributions to the visibility budget. J. Air Pollut. Control

       Assoc. 34: 643-650.


Rae, D; A. (1983) The value to visitors of improving visibility at Mesa Verde and Great Smoky National Parks.
       In: Rowe, R.  D.; Chestnut, L. G., eds. Managing air quality and scenic resources at national  parks and
       wilderness areas. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Rae, D. A. (1984) Benefits of visual air quality in Cincinnati - results of a contingent ranking survey, final
       report. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute; report no.  RP-1742.


Richards, L. W. (1983)  Comments on the oxidation of NO2 to nitrate—day and night. Atmos. Environ. 17:
        397-402.


Richards, L. W.; Anderson, J. A.; Blumenthal, D. L.; Brandt,  A. A.; McDonald, J. A.; Waters, N.; Macias,
        E. S.;'Bhardwaja, P. S. (1981) The chemistry, aerosol physics, and optical properties of a western
        coal-fired power plant plume. Atmos. Environ. 15: 2111-2134.


Robinson, E. (1968) Effect on the physical properties of the atmosphere. In: Stern, A. C., ed. Air pollution:
        v. 1, air pollution and its  effects. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.; pp. 349-400.


Ross, D.  M.; Malm,  W. C.; Loomis, R. J. (1987) An examination of the relative importance of park attributes
        at several national parks. In: Bhardwaja, P. S., ed. Visibility protection: research and policy aspects.
        Pittsburgh, PA:  Air Pollution Control Association.


 Rowe, R. D.; Chestnut, L. G. (1982) The value of visibility: economic theory and applications for air pollution
        control. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.


 Russell, A. G.;  Cass, G. R. (1986) Verification of a mathematical model for aerosol nitrate and nitric acid
        formation and its use for control measure evaluation.  Atmos. Environ. 20: 2011-2025.
          August 1991
                                                  11-61
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
51
52
53
54
 Russell, A. G.; McCue, K. F.; Cass,.G. R. (1988) Mathematical modeling of the formation of
        nitrogen-containing air pollutants. 1, Evaluation of an Eulerian photochemical model. Environ. Sci.
        Technol. 22: 263-271.


 Ruud, P. A. (1987) Contingent ranking surveys: their application and design in estimating the value of visibility.
        In: Bhardwaja, P. S., ed. Visibility protection: research and policy aspects. Pittsburgh, PA: Air Pollution
        Control Association.


 SAROAD Data, Storage and Retrieval of Aerometric Data [data base], (n.d.) [Data files for nitrogen dioxide,
        1980 through 1987; and for coarse and fine (inhalable) particulate (IP),  1979 through 1983. Data bases
     ,   were converted in 1987 to AIRS, Aerometric Information Retrieval System]. Research Triangle Park,
        NC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Disk-
        ASCH.         ,                             •    ,-   ..


 Saxena, P.; Hudischewskyj, A. B.; Seigneur, C.; Seinfeld, J. H. (1986) A comparative study of equilibrium
        approaches to the chemical characterization of secondary aerosols.  Atmos. Environ. 20: 1471-1483.


 Schulze, W. D.; Brookshire, D. S.;  Walther, E.; MacFarland,  K. K.; Thayer, M. A.; Whitworth,  R. L.;
        Ben-David, S.; Malm, W.; Molenar, J. (1983) The benefits of preserving visibility in the national
        parklands of the southwest. Nat. Resour. J. 23: 149-173.


 Seigneur, C.; Johnson, C. D.; Latimer, D. A,; Bergstrom, R. W.; Hogo,  H. (1984) User's manual for the plume
       visibility model (PLUVUE H). Research Triangle Park, NC: U.  S. Environmental Protection Agency,
       Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory; EPA report no. EPA-600/8-84-005. Available from- NTIS
       Springfield, VA;  PB84-158302.


 Shah, J. J.; Watson, J. G., Jr.; Cooper, J. A.; Huntzicker, J. J. (1984) Aerosol chemical composition and light
       scattering in Portland, Oregon: the role of carbon. Atmos. Environ. 18:  235-240.


 Sloane, C. S. (1987) The contribution of NO2 and soot to the discoloration of urban skies. In: Bhardwaja, P. S.,
       ed. Visibility protection: research and policy aspects, an APCA specialty conference;  September 1986;
       Grand Teton National Park, WY; Pittsburgh, PA: Air Pollution Control Association; pp. 434-452.
       (APCA transactions no, TR-10). .,


 Sloane, C. S.; White, W. H. (1986)  Visibility: an evolving issue. Environ. Sci.  Technol. 20: 760-766.


 Solomon, P. A.; Movers, J. L. (1984) Use of a high volume dichotomous virtual impactor to estimate light
       extinction due to carbon and  related species in the Phoenix haze.  Sci. Total Environ. 36: 169-175.


 Solomon, P. A.; Moyers, J. L. (1986) A chemical characterization of wintertime haze in Phoenix, Arizona.
       Atmos.  Environ. 20: 207-213.


 Stelson, A. W.  ; Seinfeld, J. H. (1982) Relative humidity and temperature dependence of the ammonium nitrate
       dissociation constant. Atmos. Environ. 16: 983-992.


 Stelson, A. W.; Friedlander, S. K.; Seinfeld, J. H. (1979) A note on the equilibrium relationship between
       ammonia and nitric acid and particulate ammonium nitrate. Atmos. Environ. 13: 369-371.


Stevens, R. K. (1987) [Personal communication to J. C. Trijonis]. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.  S.
       Environmental Protection Agency, Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory [as cited •
       in Trijonis (1987)].                                                                              .


Stevens, R. K.;  Dzubay, T. G.; Shaw,  R. W., Jr.; McClenny, W. A.; Lewis, C. W.; Wilson, W. E. (1980)
       Characterization of the aerosol in the Great Smoky Mountains. Environ. Sci. Technol.  14: 1491-1498.
         August 1991
                                                 11-62       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22;
23
24  .
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Stevens, R. K.; King, F.; Bell, J.; Whitfield, J. (1988) Measurement of the chemical species that contribute to
       urban haze. Presented at:  81st annual meeting .of the Air Pollution Control Association; June; Dallas,
       TX. Pittsburgh, PA: Air Pollution Control Association; paper no. 88-57.3.


Tang, I. N.; Wong, W. T.; Munkelwitz, H. R. (1981) The relative importance of atmospheric sulfates and
       nitrates in visibility reduction. Atmos. Environ. 15: 2463-2471.


Tolley, G. A.; Randall, A.; Blomquist,  G.; Fabian,  R.; Fishelson, G.; Frankel, A.; Hoehn, J.; Krumm, R.;
       Mensah, E.; Smith, T.  (1986) Establishing and valuing the effects of improved visibility in eastern
       United States. Washington, DC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.


Tombach, I. H.; Allard, D. W.; Drake, R; L.; Lewis, R. C. (1987) Western regional air quality studies,
       visibility and air quality measurements:  1981 and  1982, interim report. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power
       Research Institute; report no. EA-4903, research project 1630-11.


Trijonis, J. (1982a) Existing and  natural background levels of visibility and fine particles in the rural East.
       Atmos. Environ.  16: 2431-2445.

Trijonis, J. (1982b) Visibility in  California. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 32: 165-169.


Trijonis, J. (1987) National relationship between visibility and NOX emissions. Bloomington, MN: Santa Fe
       Research Corporation; EPA contract no, 6W-3191-NASX.


Trijonis, J.; Davis, M. (1981) Development and application of methods for estimating inhalable  and fine particle
       concentrations from routine hi-vol data. Sacramento,  CA: State of California, Air Resources Board;
       GARB report no. ARB/R-81/171. Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB83-117572.


Trijonis, J.; Yuan, K. (1978a)  Visibility in the Northeast: long-term visibility trends and visibility/pollutant
       relationships. Research Triangle Park, NC: U. S.  Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental
"  ,     Sciences Research Laboratory; EPA report no. EPA-600/3-78-075. Available from: NTIS, Springfield,
       .VA; PB-286921.                                      •

Trijonis, J.; Yuan, K. (1978b) Visibility in the southwest: an exploration of the historical data base. Research
       Triangle Park, NC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Sciences Research
        Laboratory; EPA report no. EPA-600/3-78-039. Available from:  NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB-282942.


Trijonis, J.; Cass, G.; McRae, G.; Horie, Y.; Lim, W.-Y.;  Chang, N.;-Cahill, T. (1982) Analysis of
        visibility/aerosol relationships and visibility modeling/monitoring alternatives for California. Sacramento,
        CA: State of California,  Air Resources Board; report no. ARB-R-83-197. Available from: NTIS;
        Springfield, VA; PB83-245563.

Trijonis, J.; Thayer, M.; Murdoch, J.;  Hageman, R. (1984) Air quality benefits analysis for Los Angeles and
        San Francisco based on housing values and visibility. Sacramento, CA: California Air Resources Board.


Trijonis, J. C.; Pitchford, M.; McGown, M. (1987) Preliminary extinction budget results from  the RESOLVE
        program. In: Bhardwaja, P. S., ed. Visibility protection: research and policy aspects, an APCA specialty
        conference; September 1986;  Grand Teton National Park, WY. Pittsburgh, PA:  Air Pollution Control
        Association; pp.  872-883.  (APCA transactions no. TR-10).

 Trijonis, J.; McGown, M.; Pitchford, M.; Blumenthal, D.;  Roberts, P.; White,  W.; Macias,  E.; Weiss, R.;
        Waggoner, A.; Watson,  J.; Chow, J.; Flocchini,  R. (1988) Visibility conditions and causes of visibility
        degradation in the Mojave Desert of California: executive summary, RESOLVE project  final report.
        China Lake, CA: Department of the Navy,  Naval Weapons Center; document no. NWC TP 6869.
        Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; AD-A206 322.
          August 1991
                                                  11-63
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
49
50
51
52
53
54
 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1979) Protecting visibility; an EPA report to Congress. Research
        Triangle Park, NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; EPA report no. EPA-450/5-79-008.
        Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA;  PB80-220320.


 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1985) Developing long-term strategies for regional haze: findings and
        recommendations of the visibility task force. Research Triangle Park, NC.


 Vanderpol, A. H.; Humbert, M. E. (1981) Coloration of power plant plumes—NO2 or aerosols? Atmos, Environ.
        15: 2105-2110.


 Vossler, T. L.; Lewis, C. W.; Stevens, R. K.; Dzubay, T. G.; Gordon, G. E.; Tuncel, S. G.; Russwurm,
        G. M.; Keeler, G. J. (1989) Composition and origin of summertime air pollutants at Deep Creek Lake,
        Maryland. Atmos. Environ. 23: 1535-1547.


 Waggoner, A. P.; Weiss, R. E.; Ahlquist, N. C. (1983) The color of Denver haze. Atmos. Environ.  17:
        2081-2086.


 Wall, S. M.; John, W.; Ondo, J. L. (1988) Measurement of aerosol size distributions for nitrate and major ionic
        species. Atmos. Environ. 22:  1649-1656.


 White, W. H. (1981) The role of participate sulfates and nitrates in reducing visibility. Presented at: 74th annual
        meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association; June; Philadelphia, PA. Pittsburgh, PA: Air Pollution
        Control Association; paper no. 81-54.1.


 White, W. H. (1982) Effects of nitrogen oxides on visibility. In: Air quality criteria for oxides of nitrogen.
        Research Triangle Park, NC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Health and
        Environmental Assessment, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office; EPA report no.
        EPA-600/8-82-026. Available from: NTIS,  Springfield, VA; PB83-131011.


 White, W. H.; Macias, E. S. (1987) Particulate nitrate measurements in rural areas of the western United States.
        Atmos. Environ. 21: 2563-2571.


 White, W. H.; Patterson, D. E. (1981) On the relative contributions of NO2 and particles to the color of smoke
        plumes. Atmos. Environ. 15: 2097-2104.


 White, W. H.; Roberts, P. T. (1977) On the nature and origins of visibility-reducing aerosols in the Los Angeles
        air basin. Atmos. Environ. 11: 803-812.


 White, W. H.; Seigneur, C.; Heinold, D. W.; Eltgroth, M. W.; Richards, L.  W.; Roberts, P. T.; Bhardwaja,
        P. S.; Conner, W. D.;  Wilson, W.  E., Jr. (1985) Predicting the visibility of chimney plumes: an
        intercomparison of four models with observations at a well-controlled power plant. Atmos. Environ.  19:
        515-528.


 White, W. H.; Seigneur, C.; Heinold, D. W.; Richards, L. W.; Wilson, W. E.; Roberts, P. T. (1986) Radiative
        transfer budgets for scattering and absorbing plumes: measurements and model predictions. Atmos.
        Environ. 20: 2243-2257.


Williams, M. D.; Treiman, E.; Wecksung, M. (1980) Plume blight visibility modeling with a simulated
       photograph technique. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 30: 131-134.


Williams, M.; Chan, L. Y.; Lewis, R. (1981) Validation and sensitivity of a simulated-photograph technique for
       visibility modeling. Atmos. Environ. 15:  2151-2170.


Wolff, G. T.  (1984) On the nature of nitrate in coarse continental aerosols. Atmps. Environ.  18: 977-981.
         August 1991
                                                 11-64       DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2.
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Wolff, G. T.; Korsog, P. E. (1989) Atmospheric concentrations and regional source apportionments of sulfate,
1       nitrate and sulfur dioxide in the Berkshire Mountains in western Massachusetts. Atmos. Environ. 23:
       55-65.                                                            '

Wolff, G. T.; Countess, R. J.; Groblicki, P. J.; Ferman, M. A.; Cadle, S. H.; Muhlbaier, J. L. (1981)
       Visibility-reducing species in the Denver "brown cloud"— II. sources and temporal patterns. Atmos.
       Environ. 15: 2485-2502.

Wolff, G. T.; Ferman, M. A.; Kelly, N. A.; Stroup, D. P.; Ruthkosky, M. S. (1982) The relationships between
       the chemical composition of fine particles and visibility in the Detroit metropolitan area. J. Air Pollut.
       Control Assoc. 32:  1216-1220,

Yoshizumi, K. (1986) Regional size distributions of sulfate and nitrate in the Tokyo metropolitan area in
       summer. Atmos. Environ. 20: 763-766.

Zak, B. D.; Einfeld, W.; Church, H. W.; Gay, G. T.; Jensen, A. Lf; Trijonis, J.; Ivey, M. D.; Homann, P. S.;
       Tipton, C. (1984) The Albuquerque winter visibility study. Volume 1: overview and data analysis.
       Albuquerque, NM:  U. S. Department of Energy, Sandia National Laboratories;  Sandia document no.
       SAN84-0173/1. Available from:  NTIS, Springfield, VA; DE84014356.
         August 1991
                                                  H-65  '     DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
             12.   EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES
                             ON MATERIALS

12.1  INTRODUCTION
     Materials exposed to the atmosphere in both indoor and outdoor environments may
suffer undesirable physical and chemical changes.  Although many of these changes occur
whether or not pollutants are present, the rate at which these changes occur can be influenced
by pollutant concentrations.  Nitrogen oxides (NOX), including nitric oxide (NO), nitrogen
dioxide (NO2), and nitric acid (HNO3), are known to affect the fading of dyes; the strength
of fabrics, plastics,  and rubber products;  the corrosion of metals; and the use-life of
electronic components, paints, and masonry. While the materials damage potential of sulfur
oxides (SOX) has been extensively studied, much less research has been reported for NOX.
Graedel and McGill (1986) have pointed  out, however, that sulfur dioxide (SO2)
concentrations are generally decreasing across the country and NOX levels are increasing.
The relative proportion of materials damage attributable to NOX can therefore be expected to
increase. This section discusses the impact of NOX on a number of categories of materials.
Emphasis is placed  on those experiments  and materials in which degradation was observed.
     To understand the results of materials exposure to NOX,  it is important to appreciate the
influence of several factors on the materials damage process:

      1.    The environment in which materials are exposed;
     2.    The mechanisms that cause damage in different exposures;
     3.    The wet and dry deposition processes that influence damage rates; and
     4.    The chemical interactions of NOX species with  materials and with other
           components of the environment; for example, other airborne pollutants and
           moisture.
 It is also necessary to understand the experimental techniques used to study damage processes
 and the limitations of these study techniques, as well as the results of the studies.  Finally, if
 estimates of the costs of materials damage are desired, a qualitative understanding of the
        August 1991
                                        12-1   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
31
 economic estimation procedures is needed.  A useful survey of the topic of air pollution
 damage to materials is contained in Joerg et al.  (1987).

 12.1.1  Environmental Exposures to Materials
      The materials affected by NOX occur in both indoor and outdoor environments.
 Outdoor materials will be exposed to NOX concentrations such as those discussed in Chapter
 7 plus stresses caused by a wide range of temperatures and humidities,  sunlight, and
 precipitation.  Identical materials exposed in nearby locations may be damaged at very
 different rates depending on their microenvironments (e.g., building stone sheltered by an
 overhang will be damaged at a different rate than stone openly exposed on the face of the
 same structure).  Most materials exposed for extended periods to the outdoor environment are
 selected or designed to withstand these exposures and, therefore, they degrade at a slow rate.
 Materials that may be subject to NOX damage and that are widely used  outdoors include
 paints; cement and concrete; stone; architectural and statuary metals; plastics; and elastomers.
     Indoor concentrations of NOX are discussed in Chapter 7.  Although indoor
 environments are free of many of the extreme environmental stresses present outdoors, NOX
 concentrations may be significantly higher in some indoor environments (e.g., where
 unvented gas appliances are in use) and the materials exposed indoors may be more sensitive.
 Virtually all the materials found outside are also found indoors to some extent; however,
 additional materials such as paper, fine textiles, and electronic components are more common
 in indoor than outdoor environments.  In addition, paint formulations intended for indoor
 applications are different from  those formulations intended for outdoor use.

 12.1.2  Mechanisms of Materials  Damage
      Damage to  exposed materials results from attack through both physical and chemical
processes, and damage is induced both by pollution and other agents.  Physical processes
include erosion by windborne particles, differential heating, and frost attack.  Chemical
processes include  corrosion, biological attack (e.g., mildew), direct attack by acid mists, and
gaseous and particle deposition and subsequent reactions (Tombach, 1982; Yocom and Baer,
 1983).  It is difficult to distinguish a single causative agent for observed damage to exposed
materials because  many agents, together with a number of environmental stresses, act on a
       August 1991
                                         12-2    DRAFT  - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     surface throughout its life. Even extensively studied systems (such as the effect of SO2
 2     pollution on metals) are not thoroughly understood, and there is extensive work still needed
 3     to understand the interaction of NOX with the variety of materials in use today.
 4                                                                                .
 5     12.1.3  Deposition Processes
 6           For them to cause damage to a material, atmospheric NOX must come in contact with  ,
 7     the material.  They are deposited on material surfaces through both wet and dry deposition
 8     processes (Tombach,  1982).  Dry deposition processes for gaseous NOX include Brownian or
 9     molecular diffusion to the surface, Stefan flow toward surfaces where moisture is condensingj
10     thermophoresis toward cold surfaces, and diffusiophoresis toward evaporating surfaces.  In
11     addition, particles containing NOX can be transported  to a material surface through
12     gravitational settling or inertia! impaction of the particles on the surface.  Wet deposition
13     (e.g., acid rain) processes include the scavenging of gaseous NOX or particles containing
14     absorbed NOX into precipitation or fog droplets that impact the surface. The rate at which
15     deposition processes transport NOX to the surface is dependent on the NOX concentrations in
16     the environment, the chemistry and geometry of the surface, the concentrations of other
17     atmospheric constituents, and  the turbulent transfer properties of the air (Lipfert, 1989).
18           The transfer of pollutants from the atmosphere to a surface is often visualized in terms
19     of the "multiple resistance analogy" (Sherwood et al., 1990).  In this analogy, the rate of
20     mass transfer of pollutants is modeled as being determined by a series of resistances to the
21     mass transfer.  The total resistance, RT, is made up of the sum of "free air" turbulent transfer
22     resistance, Ra; the near-surface, quasi-laminar boundary layer resistance, Rb; and the surface
23     uptake resistance,  Rc.  Thus,
24                                      RT = Ra + Rb + Rc.                            (12-1)
25
26           The aerodynamic resistance, Ra, is  dominated by atmospheric turbulence.  The
27     boundary layer resistance, Rb, depends on the aerodynamics of flow immediately adjacent to
28     the surface and the molecular diffusivity  of the pollutant.  The surface resistance, Rc,  depends
29     on the physical and chemical interactions  of the surface and the pollutant.  Depending on the
30     aerodynamic conditions, and the physical and chemical state of the surface, any of these
31     terms can be the rate-limiting step for the transfer.
        August 1991
12-3    DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
31
      The inverse of the total resistance is the deposition velocity, Vd, which has units of
 cm/s. The deposition velocity is the ratio of flux of mass to the surface (g/cm2 s) to the free
 air concentration of the pollutant (g/cm3).
      In  a laboratory study, Edney et al. (1986) measured the deposition of NO2 and various
 other compounds to both wet and dry galvanized steel.  A large "smog chamber" (an
 environmental chamber designed to simulate photochemical processes) was used for the study
 and NO2, propylene (C3H3), and SO2 were introduced in various combinations to study
 deposition processes.  Galvanized steel was exposed both dry and wet with artificial dew
 cycles caused by cooling the samples.  An experiment with a dry  surface and NO2 alone
 yielded a velocity for the deposition of NO2 to galvanized steel of 0.05 cm/s.  A similar test
 with SO2 yielded an SO2-to-galvanized steel deposition velocity of 0.8 cm/s, or deposition
 about sixteen times greater for S02 than for NO2.  Clearly, dry deposition of NO2 on
 galvanized steel is significantly slower than the dry deposition of SO2.  These researchers
 suggest that, for the purposes of developing a damage function, NO2 dry deposition oh
 galvanized steel can be ignored.
      In a test with an NO2 and propylene mixture, Edney et al. (1986) simulated smog
 conditions that might be similar to Southern California conditions  (i.e., smog with very low
 SO2 concentrations).  This experiment was allowed to proceed in the smog chamber for
 336  hours (2 weeks) with a total time  of induced dew of 196  hours in 7-h periods. At the
 end of the experiment, concentrations  in the gas phase and in dew on the surface of the
 galvanized steel were measured.  Results are shown in Table 12-1. Fairly small amounts of
 nitrite ions (NO2~) and nitrate ions (NO3~) were found on the surface and relatively little zinc
 was  freed (corroded).  Clearly, however,  the NO2 and other reactants had reacted to form a
 number of species.                                               >
      A test with NO2, C3H3, and SO2 was also run for comparison.  After 25 h, with a total
 time of wetness of 14  h for the galvanized steel, the gas and surface-dew concentrations
 shown in Table 12-2 were measured.   The gaseous species concentrations were similar to
 those found in the previous test, except for SO2.  Again, little nitrate or nitrite was  found in
the dew on the surface of the galvanized steel, especially when compared to the SO
                                                                           X.
deposition. Furthermore, far more zinc was found in solution (i.e., corroded) when SO2 was
added to  the NO2-C3H3 mixture.
       August 1991
                                         12-4   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                TABLE 12-1.  SMOG CHAMBER REACTIONS OF NO2 AND C3H3
                         AND DEPOSITION OF REACTION PRODUCTS
                                   ON GALVANIZED STEEL
Chemical
Species
03
CH3CHO
HCHO
PAN
NOY-PAN
A
HNO3
N02-
N03-
S04=
Zn
Gas-Phase
Concentration, ppb
134
254
621
57
359
7
—
—
.
—
Surface-dew
Concentration,
nmol/cm2
—
—
133
—
—
—
11
77
133
77,
       Source:  Edney et al. (1986).


 1          The above laboratory studies illustrate both the complex nature of the NOX chemistry
 2     and the relatively low deposition rate of NOX on galvanized steel.  In a subsequent field
 3     experiment, Edney et al.  (1987) measured the ion concentrations for dry deposition and in
 4     rainwater runoff from galvanized steel samples exposed outdoors in Research Triangle Park,
 5     NC. The dry deposition  ratio of SO4= to NO3" was 3.4, again illustrating the relatively low
 6     deposition velocity of NOX compared to SOX for galvanized steel, this time under outdoor
 7     exposure conditions.  These researchers speculated that the NO3~ resulted from dry deposition
 8     of HNO3 and particulate  nitrate. The  ratio of dry to total nitrate deposition was 0.46,
 9     suggesting that wet and dry deposition appeared to play abput equal roles in nitrate
10     deposition.  Regression analysis of the ion concentration showed that the NO3" did not
11     significantly relate to the zinc in solution concentrations; however, SO4=  concentrations were
12 ,,    in a one-to-one relationship with dissolved zinc.  Edney et al. (1987) concluded that NOX is
       August 1991
12-5   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                  TABLE 12-2.  SMOG CHAMBER REACTIONS OF NO2, C3H3,
                    AND SO2 AND DEPOSITION OF REACTION PRODUCTS
                                   ON GALVANIZED STEEL
Chemical
Species
03
HCHO
PAN
NOX-PAN
HNO3
S02
N02-
S03=
NO3-
S04°
Zn
Gas-Phase
Concentration, ppb
240
1,150
114
159
9
1,190
—
—
—
—
—
Surface-dew ;
Concentration,
nmol/cm2
.
560
—
—
, •
—
4
595
19
91
441
       Source:  Edney et al. (1986).
 1     not effectively deposited on galvanized steel surfaces and that sulfates dominate galvanized
 2     steel corrosion.
 3          While NOX deposition to galvanized steel may be insignificant, Spicer et al. (1987)
 4     found that there is a significant range of removal rates of NO2 by common indoor materials.
 5     Samples of 35 materials (surface area 3.3 m2) were exposed in chambers to 282 /*g/m3
 6     (0.15 parts per million [ppm]) NO2 (initial condition) at 50% relative humidity (RH) for 12 h
 7     and the rate of NO2 removal was measured.  The results of these experiments are shown in
 8     Figure 12-1. Galvanized metal ducts, probably of material similar to the metal used by
 9     Edney et al. (1987), were near the low end of removal rates measured in the Spicer et al.
10     (1987) experiments. Many common indoor materials (wallboard, wool carpet) were found to
11     have very high removal rates.  Nitric oxide gaseous concentrations were also monitored
12     during these experiments and were often found to increase as NO2 levels decreased. The
       August 1991
12-6   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
                                        01234567
                             WALLBOARD
                           CEMENT BLOCK
                            WOOLCARPET
                             BRICK (USED)
                               MASONITE
             COTTON/POLYESTER BEDSPREAD
            PAINTED (FLAT LATEX) WALLBOARD
                               PLYWOOD
                     ACRYLIC FIBER CARPET
                           NYLON CARPET
        VINYL WALL COVERING (PAPERBACKED)
                             CEILING TILE
                       POLYESTER CARPET
                          ACRYLIC CARPET
                    FURNACE FILTERS (NEW)
                            DEHUMIDIFIER
                            OAK PANELING
                  VINYL-COATED WALLPAPER
                          PARTICLE BOARD
                    FURNACE FILTERS (USED)
                            CERAMIC TILE
          WOOL(80%) POLYESTER(20%) FABRIC
                      COTTON TERRYCLOTH
          SPIDER PLANTS (WITH SOIL COVERED)
                       WALLTEX COVERING
                     WAXED ASPHALT TILES
                           WINDOW GLASS
            USED FURNACE HEAT EXCHANGER
                     FORMICA COUNTER TOP
                      POLYETHYLENE SHEET
                      ASPHALT FLOOR TILES
                         VINYL FLOOR TILE
                    GALVANIZED METAL DUCT
                   PLASTIC STORM WINDOWS
                                        01234567    8     9

                                          RATE CONSTANT FOR N02 REMOVAL, 1/hr
Figure 12-1. Bar graph of NO2 removal rate for various materials evaluated in a
              1.64 m3 test chamber at 50% RH.

Source:  Spicer et al. (1987).
August 1991
12-7    DRAFT  -DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
  7
   8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
 30
31
 author suggested that judicious selection of indoor materials might be considered as a means
 of indoor NO2 control.  However, it was not possible from these experiments to determine
 the amount of NOX accumulating on the surfaces of these materials, nor could conclusions be
 drawn on any damage to indoor materials that might result from exposure to NO2.
      MiyazaM (1984) conducted a similar experiment exposing common interior materials in
 a chamber to initial concentrations of 1,645 mg/m3 (875 ppm) NO2 and 1,124 mg/m3
 (914 ppm) NO. A summary of these results is shown in Table 12-3.  The trend in these data
 is similar to that reported by Spicer et al. (1987), with carpeting and cement showing
 relatively high deposition velocities for NO2.  Vinyl floor tile, glass, and metals showed
 relatively low deposition velocities for NO2.  Insulation board and an ester/acrylic carpet,
 materials not tested by Spicer et al. (1987), had the highest deposition velocities. MiyazaM
 (1984) also found that NO2 deposition rates increased if turbulence, humidity, and
 temperature were each increased in the chamber.  Increased turbulence escalates the rate of
 delivery of NO2 to  the surface.  Increased humidity probably results in dissolution of NO2.
 Increased temperature causes faster reaction rates.
      The deposition rates reported by Miyazaki appear to be low compared to the rates
 reported by Edney et al.  (1986); The reason for the discrepancy is not apparent; however,
 the differences may have been caused by different levels of turbulence in the two
 experimental chambers.  Caution should be used in applying data from Miyazaki (1984) for
 more than comparative purposes.

 12.1.4  Chemical Interactions of Nitrogen Oxide Species
     Not only is there wide variation in the deposition of NOY to different surfaces but NO
                                                        &•                          X
 species themselves are reactive and their interactions  with other atmospheric constituents are
 complex.  Bassett and Seinfeld (1983) proposed a chemical equilibrium model for the
 behavior of NOX, SOX, ammonium (NH3), and water in the atmosphere that is instructive for
 understanding the role of NOX in materials damage.  Nitrogen species (NO, NO2, HNO3,
 etc.) are present as gases  and in particulates  (liquid and solid) and.are deposited on material
 surfaces.  Nitric acid is potentially the NOX species most directly damaging to materials and
is formed by photochemical reactions  involving NOX  in the atmosphere.  Under dry
conditions, HNO3 can deposit on a surface and can cause direct damage.  If liquid water is
       August 1991
                                         12-8    DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
            TABLE 12-3.  DEPOSITION VELOCITIES OF NO2 AND NO
                          FOR INTERIOR MATERIALS
                                                  ~~~~    Deposition Velocity,
                                                                cm/s
Interior Material
Flooring materials
Carpet 1 (Acrylic Fiber)
Carpet 2 (Acrylic Fiber)
Carpet 3 (Acrylic Fiber)
Carpet 4 (Wool)
Carpet 5 (30% Ester, 70% Acrylic Fiber)
Tatami facing
Needle punch
Bath mat (100% Cotton)
Floor sheet 1 (Vinyl chloride)
Floor sheet 2 (Vinyl chloride)
Floor sheet 3 (Vinyl chloride)
Plastic tile
Ceramic tile •
N02

0.03
0.02
0.02
0.06
0.10'
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.001
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.004
NO

0.0003
—
—

—
0.003
0.0008
—
0.00
—
—
'• ___
—
Wall materials
   Wallpaper 1
   Wallpaper 2.
   Printed plywood

Ceiling materials
   Insulation board
   Painted insulation board
   Plaster board
   Wooden cement board
   Asbestos cement board

Fittings
   Glass
  , Painted stainless steel
   Painted wood
   Curtain
   Fusuma paper
   Shoji paper
                0.002
                0.002
                0.001
                 0.11
                 0.06
                 0.02
                 0.03
                 0.04
                 0.00
                 0.0008
                 0.003
                 0.0008
                 0.003
                 0.0003
0.00
0.00
0.001
0.003
0.003
0.0008
0.001
0.0003
0.0003
0.002
0.0003
These values were averaged from the results of the experiments at 20-26 °C, 40-60% RH.

Source:  Modified from Miyazaki (1984).
August 1991
12-9   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
31
 present, HNO3 exists in equilibrium between the liquid phase in water solution and the
 gaseous phase in the atmosphere. However, Bassett and Seinfeld  (1983) showed that in the
 presence of NH3 and sulfuric acid (H.2SO£, constituents found in the atmosphere,  the HNO3
 gas-phase versus liquid-phase equilibrium is shifted toward the gas phase.  Thus, as nitrates
 accumulate on the surface of a material much of the accumulated nitrate mass can be
 evaporated into the atmosphere as HNO3.  Baedecker et al. (1990) believe that this
 mechanism explains why most post-facto microanalytical investigations of damaged surfaces
 reveal very small amounts of nitrogen species, whereas SO4= are frequently present. Thus,
 in polluted atmospheres containing SO2 .and condensing moisture,  it is possible that NOX
 currently plays a relatively small role compared  to SO2 in causing the observed damage  to
 most materials.

 12.1.5  Materials Damage Experimental Techniques
      Because of the number of possible damaging agents and the complexity  of synergistic
 interactions, deposition processes, and exposure  scenarios, researchers have typically relied
 on controlled environmental chambers to quantify the damage rates attributable to specific
 agents such as NOX. Often materials exposure chamber studies are conducted at high
 concentrations or at elevated temperatures and humidities in order  to see damage within a
 reasonable exposure period.  In addition, some chamber studies are conducted at low flow
 rates that poorly simulate mass transfer properties in the natural environment  and lead to
 underestimation of real-world deposition rates. Also, the sequence with which materials are
 exposed to different pollutants can affect the formation of protective corrosion films, and this
 process is sometimes poorly simulated in chambers.  While such studies are useful, care
 should be exercised in the extrapolation of data and conclusions based on chamber studies to
 ambient exposures.
     The alternative to chamber studies has  been ambient exposure studies. In these
 exposure studies, the materials of interest are usually exposed to ambient conditions at several
 locations representing a spectrum of environmental variables (e.g., temperature, sunshine,
humidity, pollutant concentrations).  Statistical and chemical analyses are then used to assess
 the contribution of the measured environmental variables to the materials damage. Again, the
number of possible agents and the complexity of synergistic interactions  makes it difficult to
       August 1991
                                        12-10   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      apportion observed damage among all the possible causes.  Franey and Graedel (1985)
 2      reviewed the pollutant species that induce damage under actual ambient exposure conditions,
 3      and have suggested that for any chamber study to be realistic, moisture, radiation, carbon
 4      dioxide (CO^, reduced sulfur, a chlorine-containing gas, and a nitrogen-containing gas must
 5      be included. Because of the difficulties involved in apportioning the causes of damages,
 6      reliable appraisals of the damage induced by NOX exposure alone are not yet available.
 7           Both chamber studies and ambient exposure studies have come to rely on sophisticated
 8   '   surfa'ce chemistry analytical techniques, as well as traditional bulk chemistry analyses and
 9      measurements of physical properties. Additionally, moisture collected from the samples (run-
10'    off) has been analyzed for its chemical constituents.  The objectives of these efforts are to
11      understand the chemical reactions occurring on the sample surfaces.
12          Generally, little evidence of NOX species has been found in these analyses.  As noted in
13     the previous section, much of the NOX will be converted into HNO3 and subsequently will be
14     evaporated back into the atmosphere. Thus, if HNO3 is leading to damage, it may not be
15     adequately accounted for in either surface chemical or runoff chemical analyses; and its role
16     in the damage process could be underestimated. Better experimental techniques are needed
17     both for investigating materials damage on the whole, and for determining the role played by
18     NOX.
 19
20
21     12.2  EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON DYES AND TEXTILES
22    12.2.1  Fading of Dyes by Nitrogen Oxides
 23         Textile and dye manufacturers have recognized the problem of dye fading induced by
 24    NO for some time. Rowe and Chamberlain (1937) reported that dyes fade because of the
           A
 25    presence of NOX in combustion effluents. Carpets, upholstery,  and drapes, subjected to
 26     elevated NC-  levels in buildings using unvented gas heat, have been observed to fade within
                   X.                                      -
 27     a year when dyes not resistant to NOX fading have been used.  Fading is exacerbated when
 28     susceptible fabrics are dried in gas-fired clothes dryers, in which the concentrations of NO2
 29     can reach 3,760 ^tg/rn3 (2.0 ppm) (McLendon and Richardson,  1965). Moreover, dryer
 30     exhaust is sometimes vented to the indoor environment to conserve heat and humidity, thus
 31     increasing indoor concentrations of NOX. Textile and dye manufacturers have responded to
        August 1991
12-11   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
 NOx-induced deterioration by seeking out and using NOx-resistant dyes or inhibitors that
 forestall fading. Fading from NOX has been observed on acetate, cotton, nylon, rayon, wool,
 and polyester.
      Nitrogen oxide-induced ("gas-fume") fading received serious attention when blue
 disperse dyes were found to deteriorate significantly on cellulose acetate.  Salvin and
 coworkers (1952) pointed out that NO2 is soluble in cellulose acetate, and that during
 laboratory tests significant fading of dyes on the material can be observed within an hour.
 Hemphill et al.  (1976) tested a spectrum of dyes on various fabrics and found that NO2
 caused significant fading on the cellulose acetate samples.  Salvin and Walker (1959) and
 Salvin (1964) showed that alternative dyeing processes are available to minimize the impact
 of NOx-induced fading on cellulose acetate, but that in many cases these substitute processes
 and dyes are more expensive to  use than the processes and dyes they replaced.
      Beloin (1973) exposed a variety of fabrics and dyes to 120 )Wg/m3 (0.1 ppm) and
 1,230 /ig/m3 (1 ppm) of NO, and 90 jitg/m3 (0.05 ppm) and 940 ^g/m3 (0.5 ppm) of NO2
 for 12 weeks in an environmental exposure chamber.  He found that  "appreciable" to "very
 much" (the most severe category) fading occurred at both concentrations of NO for cottons
 with direct, reactive, and vat blue dyes, cellulose acetate with disperse blue dyes, and nylon
 with a blue dye. The cellulose acetate samples exposed to NO2 had generally greater
 amounts of color change than the samples exposed to NO.  In addition, NO2 affected cotton
 with direct and reactive red dyes, cotton with reactive blue dye, and rayon with direct red
 dye.  Beloin (1972) conducted tests on 67 dye-fabric combinations at 11 urban and rural sites
 nationwide for 3-month exposures.  The tests were conducted outdoors using  chambers
 designed to let the ambient air circulate around the samples but to exclude sunlight.  Using
 multiple regression analysis, he sought to determine which pollutants played a significant role
 in the observed change of colors on the fabrics.  He found that SO2 concentrations were
 significant for 23 fabrics, ozone  (O3) was significant for 8 fabrics, and NO2 was significant
 for 7 fabrics.  Fabric-dye combinations affected by NO2 included cellulose acetate with red
and blue disperse dyes, cotton muslin with reactive red and blue dyes, wool flannel with acid
blue dye, and the NOX gas-fading control ribbon recommended  by the American Association
of Textile Chemists and Colorists for testing NOX  fading.
       August 1991
                                         12-12    DRAFT -  DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1          Cotton is the most widely used natural textile fiber and, again, significant gas-fume
 2     fading has been noted.  Haynie et al. (1976) exposed plum-colored cotton drapery fabric to
 3     NO2 in a chamber for 1,000 h and found that serious fading occurred.  Based on
                                                                               o
 4     extrapolation they predicted that the use-life of draperies exposed to 100 jKg/nr (0.053 ppm)
 5     NO2 would decrease 19%.  In Beloin's chamber study  described above, dyes on cotton were
 6     found to experience "noticeable"  to "much" fading when exposed to NO and "noticeable" to
 7     "very much" fading when exposed to NO2. McLendon and Richardson (1965) found that
 8     blue-dyed cotton fabric became green after repeated NOX exposures in gas-fired dryers and
 9     that the NOX exposure caused white fabric to "yellow". Salvin (1969) reported the results of
10    „ sheltered, outdoor exposures of dyed cottons for 90 days in Los Angeles.  Thirty-one colors
11     of direct, vat, reactive, and sulfur dyes were tested and fifteen faded substantially.  The
12     author concluded that NOX and. O3 were primarily responsible.  Hemphill et al. (1976) also
13     demonstrated NOx-induced fading of vat, direct, and reactive dyes on cotton at concentrations
14     of 940 Aig/m3 (0.5 ppm)  in a chamber for a 5-h exposure.            -
15          Imperial Chemical Industries Limited, (1973), a supplier of dyes for synthetics, issued  a
16     technical bulletin on the gas-fume fastness of dyes used for nylon (polyamide).  Nylons have
17     high resistance to wear and thus  are often used as carpeting.  In this  application nylons are
18     exposed to indoor atmospheres for long periods.  Imperial  Chemical  Industry's bulletin
19   ,  showed that several of the commercially available dyes faded noticeably on nylon when
20     exposed to NOX fumes and advised that these dyes not be used.  The susceptible dyes fade,
21     become duller in appearance, or acquire a redder or yellower cast. Hemphill et al. (1976)
22     demonstrated that certain blue and red dyes on nylon fade  substantially when  exposed to
23     940 jug/m3 (0.5 ppm) NO2.   Beloin's (1973) chamber  study found that "appreciable" to very
24     much" fading occurred on nylon fabrics exposed to NO or N02.  In outdoor exposures in Los
25     Angeles, Salvin (1964) found that nylon faded only slightly to very slightly.
26           Other fabrics have  been tested for dye gas-fading resistance as .well.  Hemphill et al.
27     (1976) investigated dye fading of rayon.  They found that  two of the dyes tested^ Direct Blue
28  .•  86 and Direct Red 79, showed '.'noticeable" to "significant" fading.  Beloin (1973) found that
29     rayon withstood NO exposure with only a trace of fading,  but exhibited "very much" fading
30     when exposed to NO2.   In checking orlon, Hemphill et al. (1976) found minimal dye fading.
31     Salvin (1964) found that wool did not fade significantly in Los Angeles ambient exposures,
        August 1991
12-13   DRAFT  - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
28
29
30
31
 but Hemphill et al. (1976) showed moderate fading of red dye on wool in chamber
 exposures.  Polyester exhibited very good dye-fading resistance in Salvin's Los Angeles study
 (1964).
      Hie American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorist encourages textile
 manufacturers and suppliers to test dye and fabric combinations for NOX fading.  These tests
 are routinely performed and NOx-susceptible dye and fabric combinations rarely are produced
 in large quantities for the open market.

 12.2.2  Degradation of Textile Fibers by Nitrogen Oxides
      Nitrogen oxides not only affect fabric color, but can also alter the physical
 characteristics of the fiber themselves.  Jellinek (1970) and Jellinek et al. (1969) reported
 significant chain scissioning of nylon after NO2 exposure.  Chain scissioning is the breaking
 of the molecular structure that makes up a polymer and it results in a loss of strength.
 Vijayakumar et al.  (1989) found statistically significant amounts of damage to nylon textiles
 exposed for 28 days to 0.1 ppm  and 0.5 ppm concentrations of HNO3.  Zeronian et  al.
 (1971) investigated the impact of NO2 on acrylic, modacrylic, nylon, and polyester yarn.
 The yarns were continuously exposed in chambers for 1  week to simulated sunlight and
 3,760 /ig/m  (0.2 ppm) NO2.  The yarn strength and rupture energies were reduced  for all
 materials. The most seriously affected was nylon yarn, which lost approximately 30% of its
 strength and 33% of its rupture energy as compared to control samples exposed without NO2.
 The least affected was polyester, with about a 13% decrease in strength.  The loss of strength
 of the acrylics was  intermediate between the other two yarns.
12.3 EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON PLASTICS AND
      ELASTOMERS
12.3.1  Chemical Changes Induced by Nitrogen Oxides
     Plastics are highly polymerized materials, mostly synthetics, combined with other
constituents such as hardeners, fillers, and reinforcing agents (Hawley, 1981). Plastics
include fluorocarbon resins, phenolics, polyimides, polyethylene, acrylic polymers,
polystyrene, polyurethane, and numerous other synthetic compounds. Major uses of plastics
       August 1991
                                       12-14   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      include automobile bodies and components, boat hulls, building and construction materials
 2      (pipe, siding, flooring), packaging (bottles, vapor barriers, drum linings), textiles (carpets,
 3      cordage, hosiery), organic coatings such as paint and varnish vehicles, adhesives, electrical
 4      components, and numerous other applications.  Use of plastics in the United States in 1980
 5      was estimated at approximately 60 billion pounds per year, or double the 1970 consumption.
 6      Further development of arid reliance on plastics are expected to increase the demand for them
 7      in the future.  Elastomers are synthetic polymers with the ability to stretch to at least twice
 8      their normal length and retract rapidly to near their normal length when released. Examples
 9      of elastomers include butyl, nitrile, and polysulfide rubber, and neoprene.  Elastomers are
10     used for vibration dampers, wire coatings, fabrics, automobile tires, bumpers and windshield
11      wipers, and other applications.
12          Plastics and elastomers are subject to deterioration on exposure to ultraviolet radiation
13     (UV), O3, SO2,  and NOX.  Jellinek et ai. (1969) and Jellinek (1970) reported a  series of
14     experiments in which a variety of polymers and elastomers were exposed to radiation and
15     pollutants in chamber experiments.  Jellinek et al. (1969) reported the following results for
16    , high concentration  (nearly pure) NO2 exposures.
17
                   Polyethylene: minimal effect except for an increase in viscosity.
                   Polypropylene:  some cross-linking (forming of additional chemical bonds) of the
                   polymer, although not as much as when exposed to SO2.
                   Polystyrene: some chain-scissioning (breaking of chemical bonds).
                   Polymethyl methacrylate:  some chain-scissioning (breaking of chemical bonds).
                   Polyvinyl chloride:  loss of chlorine due to reaction with NO2. <
                   Polyacrylonitrile:  no significant change.
                   Nylon:  chain-scissioning occurs.                     ,
                    Butyl  rubber:  chain-scissioning.                              ,
                    Polyisoprene:  appreciable chain-scissioning.
                    Polybutadiene:  cross-linking'occurs.  ,
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 '•
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
1.

2.


3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

         August 1991
12-15   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 They concluded that damage to elastomers was generally greater than damage to plastics, but
 that O3-induced damage was probably more important than NO2-induced degradation.
     Jellinek (1970) reported findings for the same series of plastics and elastomers at NO2
 concentrations of 1,880 jttg/m3 and 9,400 /ig/m3 (1 and 5 ppm) for 1 h exposures. At these
 levels polymethyl methacrylate, nylon, and butyl rubber were found to suffer chain-
 scissioning.  Polyethylene, polypropylene, polyisoprene, and polybutadiene exhibited cross-
 linking.                                    ,
     Krause et al. (1989) exposed polyvinyl chloride, polyurethane, glass-fiber-reinforced
 polyester, and alkyd resin for 5 years in glass chambers to either 5,000 jttg/m3 NOX,
 5,000 ng/m3 SO2, 2,500 jttg/m3 O3, or a mixture of the pollutants.  The exposure cells were
 kept at a humidity of 50 to 60%.  Half of each chamber was exposed to sunlight through
 UV-transmitting glass.  The other half was kept dark.  The investigators found that most of
 the degradation was caused by sunlight, with significantly less degradation  occurring from
 dark exposures to pollutants.
     Haynie et al. (1976) exposed tire rubber and vinyl house siding to NO2, SO2, O3,
 radiation, and humidity in a chamber. Two  NO2 concentrations, 94 and 940 jiig/m3
 (0.05 and 0.5 ppm),  Were used with exposure times of 250,  500, and 1,000 h.  Various
 combinations of exposures with the other pollutants, radiation, and humidity conditions were
 used. The primary cause of damage to rubber was O3 exposure and NO2 actually seemed to
 inhibit the rate of O3-induced  damage. No appreciable damage to vinyl siding was observed.
 The National Research Council (1977) notes  that discoloration and deterioration of strength of
 foam rubber occurs from NO2 exposure.
12.4 EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON METALS
12.4.1  Role of Nitrogen Oxides in the Corrosion Process
     Atmospheric corrosion of metals is a serious problem  and air pollution is known to
accelerate corrosion processes.  Sulfur oxides and chlorides are the atmospheric contaminants
most frequently implicated in the corrosion of metals. Nitrogen oxides are also involved but
have received less attention.  Moisture enables these contaminants to form aggressive acids
that attack the metal surface and promote electrochemical reactions.  For this reason, both
       August 1991
                                        12-16    DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
1      pollutant concentrations and the "time of wetness" (i.e., the duration for which the material
2      surface has liquid water present) for exposed surfaces are important in determining the
3      amount of damage that will occur.
4           For most metals, NQX alone as an attacking agent is much less aggressive than sulfur or
5      chlorine compounds.  Svedung et al. (1983), Kucera (1986), and Johansson (1986), however,
6   .   have pointed out the synergistic impact of NOX or/atmospheric corrosion mechanisms.  Using
7      an exposure chamber, Kucera (1986) showed that carbon steel corrodes rapidly when exposed
8      to:3,421 )ug/m3 SO2 and 90% RH, but very slowly when exposed to SO2 at the same
9      concentration and 50% RH.  At 50% RH humidity, steel corrodes about three times more
10     quickly when exposed to NO2 (5,640 jug/m3).  However, when both NO2 and SO2 at the
11      same concentrations are present at 50% RH, the .corrosion rate is approximately 30 times the
12     rate seen with SO2 alone.  Kucera noted  that the presence of NO2 increases the rate of
13     deposition of SO2 on the metal surface.   Johansson (1986),. also using an exposure chamber,
14     showed that NO2 deposition leads to the  formation of hygroscopic nitrate-containing corrosion
15     products on the surface of the metal. These corrosion products, in turn, absorb moisture onto
16     the surface,  making the moisture available to mobilize other ions (such as sulfates and
17     chlorides) and thus leading to active corrosion at much lower relative humidities than if NO2
18     were, not present. Effectively,  NO2 acts to increase the time of wetness for the surfaces.
19     Svedung et al. (1983) showed similar results for gold-coated brass (a common electrical
20     contact),  with NO2-containing  atmospheres accelerating degradation at all humidity levels
21     between 40 and 80%.
22           In the outdoor environment, the deposition of NO2 is limited, for most materials, by the
23      surface uptake resistance;  and NO2 is more slowly adsorbed than SO2.  In the experiments
24      conducted by Svedung et al. (1983), Kucera (1986), and Johansson (1986), low flow rates
25      were used in the exposure chambers. During low flow conditions, the deposition rate
26     becomes limited by the surface boundary layer resistance and the effective deposition rates of
27     NO2 and SO2 may become nearly  equal. Thus, the conclusion that NOX is synergistic with
 28     SO2 may not be applicable in  outdoor environments.  In indoor exposures of materials,
 29     however, the conclusions of Svedung et al., Kucera, and Johansson may be applicable.
 30
 31                                     ...          .-,,..
         August 1991
12-17   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
31
  12.4.2  Effect of Nitrogen Oxides on Economically Important Metals
  Steel
      Steel is the most widely used structural metal and is available in a wide variety pf types
  with varying percentages of alloying elements. Basically, steel consists of iron containing
  0.02 to 1.5% carbon. The corrosion behavior of common construction steels (carbon steels,
  containing about 0.2% carbon) is similar, and rusting of exposed surfaces proceeds rapidly.
  Low alloy steels, containing chromium, nickel, copper, molybdenum, phosphorus, and
 vanadium in the range of a few percent or less for the total inclusion, are substantially
 stronger and offer improved resistance to atmospheric corrosion.  Specialty steels, such as
 stainless steels containing over 10% chromium, are designed to be highly corrosion-resistant,
 but are also much more costly.  Bare steel is not  usually exposed to the environment, but
 rather is painted to prevent rust and premature failure. Nevertheless, except where
 specifically noted, the following discussion concerns common construction steel that is boldly
 exposed with no coatings.
      Samples of enameling steel were exposed at 57 of the National Air Site Network
 locations (Haynie and Upham, 1974), for 1- and 2-year exposure cycles.  Sulfur dioxide and
 particulate matter concentrations,  relative humidity, and paniculate chemistry were monitored
 at the sites.  Corrosion rates for the steel samples were determined from weight loss
 measurements, and these data were correlated against the pollution measurements.  Haynie
 and Upham (1974) concluded that either SO2 or particulate sulfate, or both, were significant
 in causing steel corrosion.  Particulate nitrate (PN) was not statistically  significantly related to
 the observed corrosion; however, measurement techniques for PN were unreliable.
 Measurements of gaseous NOX species were not made.
     Johansson (1986) showed in a low flow chamber study that gaseous NO2 adsorbs on
 steel surfaces and reacts with water to form HNO3 and nitrous acid (HNO2). Construction
 Steel was exposed continuously for 6 weeks to 376 ^cg/m3 or 5,640 /-tg/m3 (0.2 or 3.0 ppm)
 NO2 and different levels of moisture and SO2. He determined that the deposition rate of
 NO2 was much lower than  the deposition rate for  SO2 and that, if no other pollutants were
 available, steel exposed to NO2 alone will slowly acquire a thin oxide layer (rust) that
protects the underlying steel from further damage.  Unfortunately, the nitrates formed during
 the corrosion process are hygroscopic and act to adsorb further moisture from the atmosphere
       August 1991
                                         12-18   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      at relative humidities around 50% and above.  If it is also present, SO2, which does not form
 2      hygroscopic corrosion products but does have a higher deposition rate than NO2 (Johansson,
 3      1986), reacts with this moisture to form strong acids that corrode the surface very rapidly.  In
 4      addition to its hygroscopic effect, Johansson suggested that NO2 might increase the oxidation
 5      rate of SO2 to SO4=,  and thus enhance corrosion.  At relative humidities in  excess of 90%,
 6      the synergistic effect of NO2 is lost because at these high humidity levels moisture forms on
 7      the surface whether or not NO2 is present.  In fact, Henriksen and Rode (1986) have
 8      suggested that NO2 may actually inhibit SO2-induced steel corrosion at relative humidities of
 9      95%.
10          Haynie (1986) analyzed data from 30 months of exposures of weathering steels at nine
11      sites around St. Louis, MO, as part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's)
12     Regional Air Pollution Study (RAPS). Weathering steels are architectural steels specifically
13     formulated to rapidly develop a surface corrosion  layer that protects the underlying substrate
14     steel.  The exposure samples were collated with air quality monitoring stations.  Haynie
15     (1986) statistically analyzed the observed corrosion versus meteorological and air quality
16     variables.  He found  that the sample weight change was positively correlated with the SO2
17     levels, but negatively correlated with NO2.  He concluded that NO2 decreases the solubility
18     of the corrosion layer.
 19           Haynie et al.  (1976) studied weathering steel in an exposure chamber.  While they
20      concluded that NO2 did not have as  significant an impact as SO2 on the indicated corrosion, a
21      review of the data  showed that at low relative humidities the samples showed somewhat more
22      damage at high NO2 concentrations  (940 jtig/m3,  0.5 ppm) than at low concentrations
23      (94 jtig/m3, 0.05 ppm).
 24
 25      Galvanized Steel and Zinc
 26           Because most carbon steels rust readily when exposed  to moist air, a layer of zinc is
 27      frequently coated or  galvanized onto the surface.  The zinc acts to protect the substrate steel
 28      electrochemically by preferentially corroding away, leaving the steel rust-free. Zinc
 29      galvanized steel  is used  for many outdoor purposes including chain-link fences,  highway
 30     guard rails and sign posts, roofing,  and automobile body panels.
         August 1991
12-19   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
       Whitbeck and Jones (1987) studied the accumulation of nitrates on galvanized steel in an
  exposure chamber. They exposed the galvanized steel to 18,800 /*g/m3 (10 ppm) of NO2 and
  measured the nitrate formation as a function of time on the sample surface. They found that
  the formation of nitrates was linear with time.  Haynie et al.  (1976) included galvanized steel
  in their chamber study discussed above and concluded that the effects of SO2 are much more
  significant than those of NO2.
      These results are further supported by the field investigations reported by Cramer et al.
  (1988).  They found that SO2 is more readily absorbed on galvanized surfaces than  NO  and
 NO2 and that SO2-induced corrosion probably dominates corrosion by NOX in most
 environments.  In relatively dry environments, Cramer et al. (citing Johansson, 1986) pointed
 out that NO2 can participate in a reaction to oxidize SO2 and  form sulfuric acid (H2SO4),
 which is very aggressive to galvanized surfaces.  Edney et al. (1987) statistically analyzed the
 results of exposures of galvanized steel and chemical analyses of the runoff rainwater from
 the samples.  They found that me amount of deposited SO4= dominated the amount  of
 deposited NO3-, and that SO4= and NO3~ deposition rates were strongly correlated at the field
 exposure site. The regression analysis, therefore, found that SO4= dominated the corrosion
 of galvanized steel and  that NO3' was not a significant contributor to corrosion at this
 location.  Subsequent analysis of data from the same site by Spence etal. (1988), using a
 more complete regression model,  found no statistically significant effects of pollution on
 either galvanized steel or weathering steel exposed for 3 years. The site used for this
 experiment, Research Triangle Park, NC, is relatively rural and SO2 and NO2 concentrations
 are fairly low. The analysis of Spence et al. suggests that natural weathering processes
 dominate over corrosion at this site.
     Although rarely used alone as a construction material, zinc is used for galvanizing and
 as an alloying metal and its corrosion behavior has been investigated. Johansson (1986)
 exposed zinc to NO2 and SO2 in a low-flow exposure chamber. He showed that NO2 alone
 had little impact, but was strongly synergistic when combined with SO0.   As the NOo
                                                                •^            i
 concentration in the mixture was increased from 376 ,«g/m3 to  5,640 j«g/m3 (0.2 ppm to
3.0 ppm), and the SO2 concentrations were held constant; there was little change in the rate
of corrosion.
       August 1991
                                        12-20   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1           Kucera (1986) has noted that, in the open air, zinc tends to form a layer of sulfates and
 2      carbonates on the surface that acts to passivate the metal.  This layer is basic; and if rain with.
 3      a pH value of 4 or less washes the surface, the layer is removed, exposing the substrate
 4      metal.  In this way zinc is sensitive to acid deposition, so that any pollutant, including NOX,
 5      that adds to the acidity of the environment is damaging to zinc.
 6           Hermance (1966) and Hermance et al. (1971) reported the impact of nitrates on zinc-
 7  *.   containing nickel-brass wire springs used in telephone relays.  They pointed out that
 8      hygroscopic nitrate salts collected on the springs and moisture formed on the surface at any
 9      relative humidity exceeding 50%.  The nitrate deposition resulted in attack on  the zinc in the
10     springs and premature failure of the relays. In addition, Graedel and McGill (1986) have
11      .pointed out that NO2 is known to be moderately aggressive towards nickel.  Ultimately, the
12     telephone companies were forced to replace zinc-containing nickel-brass springs in areas with
13     high NOX levels, such as Los Angeles.  Henrikson and Rode (1986) showed that at 95%  RH
14     the synergistic effects of NO2 and SO2 were not detectable for zinc corrosion.  At high
15     humidities SO2 appears to dominate zinc corrosion.
16
 17     Aluminum
 18    '       Aluminum is widely used because of its corrosion resistance and is second only to steel
 19      in the amount of metal in use.  Aluminum is often exposed without coatings,  such as paint,
20      and is used for architectural trim, aircraft, small buildings, cooking utensils, etc.  Kucera
 21      (1986) noted that the time of wetness of aluminum surfaces correlates with NOX
 22      concentrations, but could not conclude that NOX was of any practical importance in the
 23      aluminum corrosion process.  Johansson (1986) demonstrated in a chamber study that NO2
 24      did not significantly  adsorb on aluminum but that at 90% RH NO2 was synergistic with  SO2
 25      and caused nearly three  times the corrosion caused by either pollutant alone.  Henriksen and
 26     Rode (1986) showed that NO2 inhibits SO2-aluminum corrosion at 95% RH.  In a chamber
 27     study, Loskutov et al. (1982) demonstrated that the interaction of NO2 and water on an
 28     aluminum surface was a complex process. They concluded  that adsorbed  water acted to
 29     displace NOX on the surface; and that metal  corrosion occurred simultaneously with the
 30     adsorption/displacement process but slowed substantially as water displaced NOX.
         August 1991
12-21   DRAFT  - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
     1
     2
     3
     4
     5
     6
     7
     8
     9
   10
   11
   12
   13
   14
   15
   16
   17
   18
   19
I'  20
   21
   22
   23
   24
   25
   26
   27
   28
   29
   30
   31
      Vijayakumar et al. (1989) exposed aluminum to 940 and 1,880 jwg/m3 (0.5 and 1 ppm)
 NO2 in a chamber for 28 days.  They found no statistically significant impact of NO2 on
 aluminum.  They also exposed aluminum to 252 and 1,260 jug/m3 (0.1 and 0.5 ppm) HNO3
 and determined that there was statistically significant damage and that the rate of the
 damaging reaction was relatively rapid.

 Copper
      Copper is used for architectural trim, electrical components, and heat transfer coils in
 air conditioners. Chamber studies (Schubert, 1978; Rice et al., 1981)  have shown that NO2
 has little impact on copper at concentrations up to 2,444 /*g/m3 (1.3 ppm). Rice et  al.
 (1980a) concluded from a multiple-city exposure study that hydrogen sulfide (H2S),  SO2, and
 O3 all had more impact than NOX on copper.  Kucera (1986), Johansson (1986), and
 Henriksen and Rode (1986), using chamber studies, found that the NO2 and SO2 combined
 was synergistic and increased the observed corrosion rate of copper by ten to twenty times the
 rate observed with single gas exposures under low-flow-rate conditions.

 Nickel
     Nickel is used as a coating material to protect other metals from corrosion and  is
 particularly resistant to environments that aggressively attack steels, aluminums, and a variety
 of other metals (e.g.,  marine environments).  Rice et al. (1980a) investigated the indoor
 corrosion of nickel in several urban areas and found that SO2, NO2,  and chlorides played a
 significant role in accelerating nickel corrosion.  In a chamber study, Rice et al. (1980b)
 found that NO2 attacked nickel but that SO2 and chlorine (C12) were more aggressive than
 NO2.  Graedel and McGill (1986) have listed NO2 as being moderately aggressive toward
 nickel.

 12.4.3  Effects of Nitrogen Oxides on Electronics
     While the impact of air pollution on architectural and structural metals in  the outdoor
environment has been recognized for some time,  the attack of NOX on electronic components,
generally used in indoor environments, is a more recently recognized problem.  Telephone
companies first reported the problem with failures of wire-spring relays in telephone
          August 1991
                                        12-22   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      switching offices located in regions with high NOX levels (Hermance, 1966; McKinney and
 2      Hermance,  1967; Hermance et al.,  1971).  Nitrogen oxides were depositing on the springs
 3      and eventually leading to stress corrosion failures.  Here, the cost of the failed part, the,
 4      spring, was a minor consideration compared to the loss of service. Eventually, technology
 5      made the wire-spring relays obsolete, but meanwhile inconveniences and costs were incurred
 6      as the result of these failures.
 7           Most of the gold used for industrial purposes is used to inhibit corrosion in electrical
 8      contacts. Svedung et al. (1983) tested the corrosion resistance of gold-plated brass, one of
 9    .  the most common contact materials, in an atmosphere containing 940 ^g/m3 (0.5 ppm) NO2.
10     They found that NO2-containing environments were more aggressive than SO2 environments
11      at all relative humidities from 40 to 80%.  As found with common metals, an environment
12     containing a mixture of NO2 and SO2 was even more damaging.  Samples of gold contacts
13     exposed to mixed gas atmospheres  became partly covered by visible corrosion after 2 to 3 h.
14     Kucera (1986) reported similar findings for electrolytic copper contacts. Buildup of corrosion
15     layers  on electrical contacts causes loss of conductivity and possible failure of the contact.
16          Voytko and Guilinger (1988) exposed gold, nickel, and palladium samples electroplated
17     on copper substrates to an atmosphere containing 100 ppb NO2, 100 ppb H2S, and 10 ppb
 18     Clo at 60% RH for 332 h. These  samples were designed to simulate typical electrical contact
          £
 19,    materials.  They found that all coatings developed "pores" which allowed the substrate copper
20     to corrode and that the "solderability" of the specimens generally decreased after exposure.
21      Graedel and McGill (1986) reviewed the impact of pollutants on a variety of materials, and
 22      listed  NO2 as being moderately aggressive to solder.
 23           Abbott (1987) exposed electrical contacts made of cobalt-hardened gold over sulfamate-
 24      nickel to different pollutant mixtures in a laboratory test environment.   He found that H2S
 25      and SO2, both singly and in combination, were fairly benign to the contact surfaces, even as
 26      concentrations approached 1 ppm, producing only mild pore corrosion. The reaction became
 27      more  severe when NO2 was added to the mixture.  A mixture of 0.1 ppm H2S plus 0.1 ppm
 28      SO2 plus 0.1 ppm NO2 was more aggressive than 0.5 ppm H2S plus 1.0 ppm SO2.  Abbott
 29    . also estimated that approximately  30% of indoor electrical and electronic equipment
 30     environments are corrosive enough to result in  pore corrosion and film creep that could lead
 31     to component failure.
         August 1991
12-23   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
30
31
       Freitag et al. (1980) investigated the corrosion of magnetic recording heads of the types
  used in computers.  They found that exposure to 0.3 ppm of NO2 and SO2 led to the
  formation of corrosion products on the heads.  This corrosion would lead to a degradation of
  the magnetic properties of the recording head.
  12.5  EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON PAINTS
      Paints are by far the dominant class of manmade materials exposed to the atmosphere in
  both indoor and outdoor environments.  Paint systems are used to protect substrate materials
  such as wood, steel, and stucco from damaging environmental agents, including moisture,    ;
  sunlight, and pollutants. Paints are also applied for aesthetic reasons.  Paints are broadly
  classified as architectural coatings (e.g., house paints, stains, varnishes), product coatings
  (e.g., furniture finishes, automotive paints, appliance coatings), and special-purpose coatings
  (e.g., bridge paints, swimming pool coatings, highway marking paint).
      While paints are designed to erode uniformly and repainting is expected, any damaging
 process that exposes the substrate material or discolors the finish more rapidly than natural
 weathering results in premature failure of the paint system and leads to the need for
 maintenance and thus to increased costs. Major paint manufacturers routinely conduct
 proprietary tests of their coatings, and some information is available in  the open literature
 about the effects of NOX on selected paint systems.  Because paint formulations vary widely,
 however, results obtained for one paint may not be directly applicable to other paints.
     Spence et al. (1975) investigated the effects of various  pollutants on oil-based house
 paint, vinyl coil coating, and acrylic coil coating.  A chamber study approach was used with
 1,000 h of exposure to 94 and 940 /*g/m3 (0.05 and  0.5 ppm) NO2 in combination with
 various levels of SO2, O3, and humidity.  The coil coatings  were very resistant to all
 pollutants and showed little change over the course of the experiment.  The oiR>ased house
 paint was found to be most sensitive to SO2 and humidity, but increased concentrations of
 NO2 led to increased sample weights.  This  implies that the NO2 was reacting with the paint
 in some way, although whether this reaction was significant was not discussed.
     Haynie and Spence (1984) reported results of exposures of latex  and oil  exterior house
paints for 30 months at nine sites around St. Louis, MO.  They reported that NO became
                                                                          X
       August 1991
                                        12-24   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1     .incorporated into the latex paint film and suggested that it reacted with the polymers that
 2      make up the paint.  Similar results were reported for oil-based paint and brown staining.
 3           Vijayakumar et al. (1989) exposed samples of high- and low-carbonate paints to NO2
 4      and HNO3 for 28 days in an exposure chamber.  They found statistically significant damage
 5      to low-carbonate paints at 940 /xg/m3 (0.5 ppm) NO2, but not at 1,880 /*g/m3 (1 ppm) NO2.
 6      The amount of damage was slight.  At 1,260 jug/m3 (0.5 ppm) HNO3, however, both
 7      carbonate and non-carbonate paints were damaged.
 8                  •              •            •      •                '
 9        ; ...      .       •       .                   ••.•••      •  • •  "'
10      12.6  EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON STONE AND CONCRETE
11           Air pollution has been known to damage both building and statuary stone.  Many
12      famous edifices, such as the Taj Mahal and the Parthenon in Athens, have been the subject of
13,     studies of air pollution-induced damage to building stone. Calcareous stone, such as
14     limestone, marble,  and carbonate cemented sandstone, is subject to air pollution attack.
15     Silicate stone,  such as granite, slate, and non-carbonate sandstone, is much less susceptible.
16     The effects of SO2 deposition on calcareous stone are well-documented because calcium
17     sulfate (gypsum) has limited solubility and remains on protected stone surfaces as a dark
18     gypsum coating. Calcium nitrate resulting from direct NOX attack is both very soluble and
19     hygroscopic and thus washes off the stone surface almost as soon as it is exposed to rain.
20     Livingston and Baer (1983) suggest that the solubility of calcium nitrate has caused many
21     researchers to overlook NOX deposition to stone.  Thus, while few data are available, NOX
22    , may have a significant effect on certain types of stone.
23          The interaction of NCL with building stone is complex.  Not only will 'nitrogen
                                A.
24     compounds interact directly with the stone, but various endolithic bacteria present in the stone
25     result in biochemical interactions (Baumgaertner et al., 1990).  Nitrosomonas spp. oxidize
26     ammonium to nitrous  acid and Nitrobacter spp. oxidize HNO2 to HNO3. Production of these
27     acids results in direct  chemical attack to calcareous stone and concrete.  Baumgartner et al.
28     have also reported that the surface of construction stone is a significant source of NO,
29     apparently, biologically produced.  On the other hand, NO2 and NH3 are absorbed by the
 30      stone.
        August 1991
12-25   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
30
31
       Baedecker et al. (1990) summarized the work of several researchers for the National
  Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (NAPAP).  They noted that by far the greatest
  chemical erosion of calcareous stone results from the natural constituents of clean rain.
  Carbon dioxide dissolved in rain forms carbonic acid that reacts with the calcium of the
  stone. Baedecker et al. estimated that wet-deposited hydrogen ions from all acid species
  account for about 20% of the chemical weathering of the NAPAP limestone and marble
  samples. Dry deposition of SO2 was responsible for approximately 6 to 10% of the chemical
  weathering; and dry deposition of HNO3 (believed to be the major form of NOX attack)
  accounted for 2 to 6% of chemical erosion.  They noted that an adequate model for
  predicting dry deposition of HNO3 to stone is not available, and suggested that this topic
  needs further research.
      Mansfeld  (1980) performed a statistical analysis of damage incurred on marble samples
 exposed for 30  months at nine air quality monitoring sites around St. Louis, MO.  He
 concluded that NO3 and total suspended particulate (TSP) levels best correlated with observed
 stone degradation; however, the analytical techniques used may be questionable and could
 have resulted  in inappropriate conclusions.  Livingston (1985) reviewed current studies
 regarding the  impact of NOX on calcareous stone.  He concluded that sulfates dominate the
 damage to stone, but that NOX can play a role.  Livingston also showed that the reaction of
 stone with SO2 is thermodynamically favored over the reaction with NO2, and that if both
 pollutants are  present more calcium sulfate than calcium nitrate will be formed.  Amoroso
 and Fassina (1983) have suggested that the primary impact of NOX on stone may be its role
 in oxidizing SO2 to form sulfate and eventually H2S04.  Although this is not a direct NO
                                                                                  X
 attack, it does lead to the degradation of stone.
      Johansson et al. (1988) exposed limestone, marble,  and travertine to SOo and NO  for
                                                                       £       X
 6 weeks at various concentration combinations in the ppm and  sub-ppm range.  The exposure
 chamber flow  rates were low, with a net "wind speed" over the samples of only 0.004 m/s.
 The investigators found that  significantly more gypsum formation occurred with  the
 combinations of pollutants than with either pollutant alone.  The low flow rates in the
 chamber, however, make these data questionable for direct application to outdoor exposures.  '
     Concrete is a widely used construction material and  dominates infrastructure
construction (bridges, highways, water and sewer systems). Webster and  Kukacka (1985)
       August 1991
                                        12-26   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1      surveyed the construction industry and the technical literature for information regarding the
 2      impact of pollutants on concrete and cement.  They speculate that HNO2 and HNO3 are more
 3      damaging than H2SO4 to concrete on brief exposures because they convert the Ca(OH)2 to
 4      very soluble calcium nitrate.  They also believe that even highly diluted HNO3 solutions can
 5      bring about extensive destruction to concrete.
 6
 7     .            ;.  •  .          •         .                                     ."
 8      12.7 EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON PAPER AND ARCHIVAL
 9            MATERIALS
10          Paper is the primary storage medium for permanent records ranging from personal
11      photographs to the Constitution of the United States. The National Research Council (1986)
12     noted that NO2 and other "acid gases"  are expected to promote the failure of the cellulose
13     fibers that make up paper. They recommended that the storage condition standards suggested
14     by the National Institute of Standards and Technology be followed and that NOX levels in
            *                        '                   ^l
15     archives, libraries, and museums not exceed 5 jug/m .
16          Baer and Banks (1985) have pointed out a particular problem with NOX pollution that
17     libraries, museums, and archives face.  In the nineteenth century, cellulose nitrate was
18     produced in large quantities as the first plastic and was used in a wide variety of products.
19     The common uses included photographic film, "acetate" recording disks, pre-vinyl imitation
20     leather, adhesives, and finishes. As cellulose nitrate ages it continuously emits NOX.  If large
21     quantities of books with artificial leather bindings (or  rebinding using pyroxylin-impregnated
22     cloth) or of early photographic film are stored, NOX indoor emissions, which can be
23      significant, may cause elevated concentrations unless the storage  area is adequately vented.
 24      In extreme cases of nitrate film storage in sealed vaults with no ventilation, the resulting gas
 25      pressure "may be enough to force out  masonry walls". If cellulose nitrate film is stored in
 26      sealed containers,  NOX concentrations can buildup to  the point of causing an autocatalytic
 27      reaction that can end in spontaneous combustion.  Several collections of historic motion
 28      picture films have been destroyed in fires resulting from this process.
 29           Salmon et al. (1990) measured nitrogen species  deposition during two seasons in five
 30     museums in Los Angeles and measured outdoor concentrations of NOX species, as well.
 31      They noted that previous studies that attributed the damage to NO2 may have actually been
        August 1991
12-27   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
27
28
29
 seeing damage induced by "co-pollutant" species, such as HNO3.  Concentrations of HNO3
 within the museums were in the range of 1 to 40% of the outdoor concentrations.  They
 measured apparent HNO3 deposition velocities to vertical surfaces inside the museums, and
 found values of approximately 0.18 to 2.37 cm/s.  They suggested that the deposition of total
 inorganic nitrate (gas-phase plus aerosol-phase) onto vertical surfaces is dominated by gas-
 phase species (probably HNO3 vapor).  A further study of HNO3 removal by air-handling
 systems was conducted at one museum, and Salmon et al. (1990) found that approximately
 40% of the HNO3 was removed by deposition within the ventilation system.  It was
 suggested that very low measured values of HNO3 within galleries may be misleading.
 Deposition of HNO3 on surfaces within the museums, probably including the collection, was
 rapid and potentially induced damage.
 12.8  COSTS OF MATERIALS DAMAGE FROM NITROGEN OXIDES
     Cost estimates for materials damage have been based on two distinct approaches.  The
 first technique, the "top-down approach," involves determining the dollar value of a material
 produced each year and then estimating the percentage of that value that is lost each year
 from pollutant-induced damage.  The advantage of this approach is its ease of application.
 However, it is not rigorous and is likely to  contain significant errors.  For example, using the
 top-down approach it is not possible to determine the pollutant exposure levels of the
 materials since mere is no way to determine the locations in which the materials are
 deployed.  All that can be done is to use gross averages for exposures with this technique.
     The second technique is the "bottom-up approach," in which as much detail as possible
 is gathered regarding the geographic distribution of materials, the spatially resolved pollutant
 concentrations and other variables, and the costs of repairs and replacement.  The bottom-up
 approach is more rigorous and demanding in terms of data requirements, and may yield a
 closer estimate of actual costs than the production approach.  The accuracy of either approach
is unknown.  The methodology of cost estimation for materials damage needs  further research
and development.
       August 1991
                                       12-28   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1           The costs of some types of NOx-induced damage to textiles were estimated by the

 2      National Research Council (1977).  The following estimates, in 1977 dollars and based on

 3      1977 production rates, were made.
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20..
21
22

23
24

25"
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
 33
 34
 35
 36
     1.   .  $53 million incurred from dye fading on acetate fibers. This
           includes costs for more expensive, fade-resistant dyes; inhibitors;
           research; quality control; fade losses at the manufacturing and retail
           level; and reduced product life at the consumer level as the result of
           fading.   ^                         ,         •..   ,

     2.     $22 million incurred from dye fading on cotton fibers.  This includes
           estimates of cotton fabrics exposed in polluted areas, percentages of
           dyes known to be susceptible to NOX fading,  and yearly loss in use-
           life.

     3.     $22 million incurred from dye fading on viscose rayon and rayon
           blends with nylon, polyester, or acetate.  This includes reduced wear-
           life for sensitive dye shades.                 -...•-.
     Estimates of the costs of other types of losses caused by adverse NOX impacts on

textiles and fibers are not available.  Loss of strength and shortened use-life may be a
significant cost for fibers used for industrial purposes.  According to the National Research
Council (1977), 18 to 20% of all fibers produced are used by industry for items such as
tarpaulins, cords, and rope.  Loss of strength for fibers used for these'purposes shortens use-

life and may present a safety hazard.
     Estimates of the costs of NOx-induced damage to plastics and elastomers are not
reported in the literature.  The damages suffered through cross-linking and chain-scissioning

are loss of strength,  increased cracking, and discoloration.  As the use'of these compounds
for construction and automotive applications increases, the amount of exposure to NOX will

increase and the disbenefit costs of this exposure are expected to increase.
     No overall  estimates of the costs of NOx-mduced damage to metals and electronics are

available.  For metallic corrosion in general, the" costs are large.  The paint and coatings
industry, for example, produces a spectrum of products designed to prevent rust on steel and

these coatings would not be needed if corrosion were not a problem.
        .August 1991
                                          12-29   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
29
30
31
       Damage to paints, concrete, and stone produces potentially one of the largest economic
  disbenefits of NOx-induced materials damage because the use of these materials is
  widespread.  In 1987, sales by the paints and coatings industry alone approached $10 billion.
  The costs of infrastructure replacement because of concrete degradation can be seen as part of
  the annual highway budgets. Damage to historic stone structures and statues is mostly a
  cultural cost and is not readily calculated. Jirillo et al. (1987), however,  have reported the
  costs of preservation of Italian artistic properties as 69,697 thousand million lira,  with a
  sizable fraction of the damage attributed by the authors to acid deposition.
 12.9 SUMMARY OF THE EFFECTS OF NITROGEN OXIDES ON
       MATERIALS
      Nitrogen oxides have been shown to cause or accelerate damage to manmade materials
 exposed to the atmosphere.  Strong evidence exists for the negative impact of NO  on dyes
 and fabrics.  Many varieties of dyes are known to fade, become duller, or acquire a different
 cast, and white fabrics may "yellow" from exposure to NOX.  Fade-resistant dyes and
 inhibitors have been developed, but are generally  more costly to employ.  Nitrogen oxides
 also attack textile fibers and result in a loss of strength.  Plastics and elastomers are subject to
 NOX reactions that cause discoloration and  changes in physical properties, including loss of
 strength.  The rate of NOx-induced deterioration to plastics and elastomers is  generally
 overshadowed, however, by O3-induced damage.  Although NOX attacks metals,  attack by
 SO2 is more aggressive.  Damage to metals from  NOX can generally be discounted, except
 perhaps in indoor exposures, where NOX may react synergistically with SO2.  Also largely
 indoors,  NOX is deposited on electronic components and magnetic recording equipment and
 may lead to failures in these systems.  The  influence of NOX on paints  and stone has not been
 clearly demonstrated.  Many authors indicate that  NOX plays a role in damaging these
 materials, but most concede that SO2 and O3  are more directly damaging. Nitrogen oxides,
along with other "acid pollutants," attack the  cellulose fibers in paper, leading to
discoloration and weakened structure.
     The presence of NOX will shorten the  use-life of susceptible, materials and generally the
rate of damage is proportional to the pollutant concentration.  Adequate NOX damage
       August 1991
                                        12-30  ; DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
• 1,     functions for a wide variety of materials are not available.  Consequently, cost/benefit
 2     analyses of permissible NOX levels vis-a-vis shortened use-life estimates could be misleading.
 3     Cost estimates for NOx-specific damage at existing concentrations are available only for dye
 4     fading ($97 million annually in 1977 dollars), and these estimates are very out of date.
 5          The highest NOX levels are to be found indoors where unvented combustion systems
 6     (e.g., gas stoves) are used and the widest variety of  materials are routinely exposed.
 7     Therefore, the principal effects of NOx-induced damage to materials are probably seen in the
 8     indoor environment, but few data are available regarding materials deterioration indoors.
 9     This is an area of needed research.
10                                                                   .     . .                 .
        August 1991
12-31   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
        REFERENCES
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
 Abbott, W. H. (1987) Corrosion of porous gold plating in field and laboratory environments. Plat. Surf. Finish.
        74:72-75.


 Amoroso, G. G.; Fassina, V. (1983) Stone decay and conservation: atmospheric pollution, cleaning,
        consolidation and protection. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (Materials
        science monographs 11).


 Baedecker, P. A.; Edney, E. O.; Morgan, P. J.; Simpson, T..C.; Williams, R. S.; Hosker, R. P.;
        Longmuir, D.; Mossotti, V. G.; McGee, E. S.; Reddy, M. M.; Spiker, E. C.; Weseley, M. J.;
        Kishiyama, G.; Pavich, M. V.; Raimann, K. J.; Schmiermund, R. L.; Sciammarella, C. A.;
        Youngdahl, C. A.  (1990) Effects of acidic deposition on materials. Washington, DC: National.Acid
        Precipitation Assessment Program; State of science and technology report no. 19.


 Baer, N. S.; Banks, P. N.  (1985) Indoor air pollution: effects on cultural and historic materials. Int. J. Museum,
        Manage. Curatorship 4: 9-20.


 Bassett, M.; Seinfeld,  J. H. (1983) Atmospheric equilibrium model of sulfate and nitrate aerosols. Atmos.
        Environ. 17: 2237-2252.


 Baumgaertaer, M.; Remde, A.; Bock, E.; Conrad, R. (1990) Release of nitric oxide from building stones into
        the atmosphere. Atmos. Environ. Part B 24: 87-92.


 Beloin, N. J. (1972) Fading of dyed fabrics by air pollution. Text. Chem. Color. 4: 77-82.


 Beloin, N. J. (1973) Fading of dyed fabrics exposed to air pollutants. Text. Chem.  Color. 5: 128-133.


 Cramer, S.;  Carter, J.  P.; Linstrom, P. J.; Flinn, D. R. (1988) Environmental effects in the atmospheric
       corrosion of zinc. la: Dean, S. W.; Lee, T. S., eds.  Degradation of metals  in the atmosphere:
       proceedings of a symposium on corrosion of metals; May 1986; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia, PA:
       American Society for Testing and Materials; pp. 229-247. (ASTM special technical publication 965).


 Edney, E. O.; Stiles, D. C.; Spence, J. W.; Haynie, F. H.; Wilson, W. E. (1986)  A laboratory study to evaluate
       the impact of NOX, SOX, and oxidants on atmospheric corrosion of galvanized steel. In: Baboian, R., ed.
       Materials degradation caused by acid rain: developed from the 20th state-of-the-art symposium of the
       American Chemical Society; June 1985; Arlington, VA. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; ."
       pp. 172-193. (ACS symposium series 318).                             .    .
                                                                                      j
 Edney, E. O.; Stiles, D. C.; Corse, E. W.; Wheeler, M. L.;  Spence, J. W.; Haynie, F. H.; Wilson, W. E., Jr..
       (1987) Field study to determine the impact of air pollutants on the corrosion of galvanized steel.,
       Presented at: Corrosion/87; San Francisco, CA. NACE; paper no. 410.


 Franey, J. P.; Graedel, T. E. (1985) Corrosive effects of mixtures of pollutants. J.  Air Pollut. Control Assoc.
       35: 644-648.


 Freitag, W.  O.; Mee, P.; Petersen, R. (1980) Glass/ferrite interactions and corrosion of gap glasses in recording.
       heads.  IEEE Trans. Magn.  16: 876-878.


 Graedel, T. E.; McGill, R. (1986)  Degradation of materials in the atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol.
       20: 1093-1100.


Hawley, G.  G. (1981)  The condensed chemical dictionary. 10th ed. New York, NY:' Van Nostrand Reinhold
       Company.
         August 1991
                                                12-32    DRAFT  - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
 51
 52
 53
Haynie, F. H. (1986) Environmental factors affecting corrosion of weathering steel. In: Baboian, R., ed.
       'Materials degradation caused by acid rain: developed from the 20th state-of-the-art symposium of the
       American Chemical Society; June 1985; Arlington, VA.  Washington, DC: American Chemical Society;
       pp. 163-171. (ACS symposium series 318).

Haynie, F. H.; Spence, J. W. (1984) Air pollution damage to exterior household paints. J.  Air Pollut. Control
       Assoc. 34: 941-944.

Haynie, F. H.; Upham, J. B. (1974) Correlation between corrosion behavior of steel and atmospheric pollution '
       'data. In: Corrosion in natural environments. Philadelphia, PA:  American Society for Testing and
       Materials; pp.  33-51. (ASTM special technical publication 558).


'Haynie, F. H.; Spence, J. W'.; Upham, J. B. (1976) Effects of gaseous pollutants on materials--a chamber study,
       Research Triangle Park, NC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Sciences Research
       Laboratory; EPA report no. EPA-600/3-76/015. Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB-251580.


Hempbill, J. E.; Norton, J. E.; Ofjord, O. A.; Stone, R. L. (1976) Colorfastness to light and atmospheric
       contaminants.  Text. Chem. Color. 8: 60-62.

Henriksen, J. F.; Rode, A.  (1986) Corrosion rates of various metals in SO2/NO2 polluted atmospheres. In:
        Proceedings of the 10th Scandinavian corrosion congress; June; Stockholm, Sweden. Stockholm, Sweden:
        Swedish Corrosion Institute; pp. 39-42.

Hermance, H. W. (1966) Combatting the effects of smog on wire-spring relays. Bell Lab. Rec. (February):

        48-52.                                             '

Hermance, H. W.; Russell, C. A.; Bauer, E.' J.; Egan, T. F.; Wadlow, H. V. (1971) Relation of airborne nitrate
        to telephone equipment damage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 5: 781-785.


Imperial Chemical Industries Limited. (1973) Nylomine dyes: effect of burnt gas fumes. Manchester, United
        Kingdom: Imperial Chemical Industries Limited, Organics Division; publication no. D  1322, synthetic

        fibre dyeing.

Jellinek, H. H. G. (1970) Chain scission of polymers by small concentrations (1 to 5 ppm) of sulfur dioxide and
        nitrogen dioxide, respectively, in presence of air and near ultraviolet radiation.  J. Air Pollut. Control
        Assoc. 20: 672-674.

 Jellinek, H. H. G.; Flajsman, F.; Kryman, F. J. (1969) Reaction of SO2 and NO2 with polymers. J. Appl.
        Polym. Sci. 13: 107-116.

 Jirillo, R.; Fonseca, G.; Ruggeri, P.  (1987) Effects of acid rain on the environment. Some technical and
        economic aspects of the Italian situation. In: Perry, R., ed. Aci'd rain. London, United Kingdom: Selper
        Publishers; pp. 801-807.

 Joerg, F.; Schmitt, D.; Ziegahn, K.-F.  (1987) Materialschaden durch Lufrverunreinigungen. Sohderdr.
        Landsburg/Lech: Economed.

 Johansson, L.-G. (1986) A laboratory study of the influence of NO2 and SO2 on the atmospheric corrosion of
        steel, copper, zinc  and aluminium. Proc. Electrochem. Soc. 86-6:  267-279.

 Johansson, L.-G.; Lindqvist, O.; Mangio, R. E. (1988) Corrosion of calcareous stones in humid air containing
        SO2 and NO2. Durability Build.  Mater. 5: 439-449.
          August 1991
                                                  12-33    DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
   9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
 51
 52
53
54
 Krause, H. H.j Bohn, M. A.; Pfeil, A.; Schmitt, D.; Ziegahn, K.-F. (1989) Polymer failures induced by air
        pollutants. In: Brasser, L. J.; Mulder, W. C., eds. Man and his ecosystem: proceedings of the 8th world
        clean air congress, v. 2; September; The Hague, The Netherlands. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier
        Science Publishers B.V.; pp. 337-342.


 Kucera, V. (1986) Influence of acid deposition on atmospheric corrosion of metals: a review. In: Baboian, R.,
        ed. Materials degradation caused by acid rain: developed from the 20th state-of-the-art symposium of the
        American Chemical Society; June 1985; Arlington, VA. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society;
        pp. 104-118. (ACS symposium series 318).                                                     :


 Lipfert, F. W. (1989) Dry deposition velocity as an indicator for SO2 damage to materials.  JAPCA 39: 446-452.


 Livingston, R. A. (1985) The role of nitrogen oxides in the deterioration of carbonate stone. In: Felix, G., ed.
        Proceedings of the 5th international congress on deterioration and conservation of stone; Lausanne,
        Switzerland. Lausanne, Switzerland: Presses Polytechniques Romandes; v. 1; pp. 509-516.:


 Livingston, R. A.; Baer, N. S. (1983) Mechanisms of air pollution-induced damage to stone. In: Proceedings of
        the Vlth world congress on air quality, v. 3, atmospheric pollution and materials; May; Paris, France.
        Paris, France: International Union of Air Pollution Prevention Associations; pp. 33-40.


 Loskutov, A. L; Enikeev, E. Kh.; Rozenfel'd, I. L.; Alekseev, V. N. (1982) Interaction of a nitrogen
        dioxide-oxygen-water vapor mixture with oxidized surfaces of aluminum and iron. Prot. Met  (Engl
        Transl.) 18: 183-186.


 Mansfeld, F. (1980) Regional air pollution study: effects of airborne sulfur pollutants on materials. Research  •
        Triangle Park, NC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Sciences Research
        Laboratory; EPA report no. EPA-600/4-80-007. Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB81-126351.


 McKinney, N.; Hermance,  H. W. (1967) Stress corrosion cracking rates of a nickel-brass alloy under applied
        potential. In: Stress corrosion testing: a symposium presented at the sixty-ninth annual meeting of the
        American Society for Testing and Materials; June-July 1966; Atlantic City, NJ. Philadelphia, PA:
        American Society for Testing and Materials; pp. 274-291. (ASTM special technical publication no.  425).


 McLendon, V.; Richardson, F.  (1965) Oxides of nitrogen as a factor in color changes of used and  laundered
        cotton articles. Am. Dyest. Rep. 54: 15-21.             ,      -


 Miyazaki, T. (1984) Adsorption characteristics of NOx by several kinds of interior materials. In: Berglund, B.;
        Lindvall, T.; Sundell, J., eds. Indoor air: proceedings of the 3rd international conference on indoor air
        quality and climate, v. 4, chemical characterization and personal exposure; August; Stockholm, Sweden.
        Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Council for Building Research; pp. 103-110. Available from: NTIS
        Springfield, VA; PB85-104214.


National Research Council.  (1977) Nitrogen oxides. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.


National Research Council.  (1986) Preservation of historical records. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.


Rice, D. W.; Cappell, R. J.; Kinsolving, W.; Laskowski, J. J. (1980a) Indoor corrosion of metals.          £'
       J.  Electrochem. Soc. 127: 891-901.                                                            ,«


Rice, D. W.; Phipps, P. B. P.; Tremoureux, R. (1980b) Atmospheric corrosion of nickel. J. Electrochem.  Soc :
        127: 563-568.
Rice, D. W.; Peterson, P.; Rigby, E. B.; Phipps, P. B. P.;  Cappell, R. J.; Tremoureux, R.  (1981) Atmospheric
       corrosion of copper and  silver. J. Electrochem. Soc. 128: 275-284.
         August  1991
                                                 12-34    DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
 1
 2  ,
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Rowe, F. M.; Chamberlain, K. A. J. (1937) The "fading" of dyeings on cellulose acetate rayon: the action of
       "burnt gas fumes" (oxides of nitrogen, etc.  in the atmosphere) on cellulose acetate rayon dyes. J. Soc.
       Dyers Colour. 53: 268-278.


Salmon, L. G.;  Nazaroff, W. W.; Ligocki, M. P.;  Jones, M. C.; Cass, G. R. (1990) Nitric acid concentrations
       in southern California museums. Environ. Sci. Technol. 24: 1004-1013.


Salvin, V. S. (1964) Relation of atmospheric contaminants and ozone to lightfastaess. Am. Dyest. Rep.
       53: 33-41.


Salvin, V. S. (1969) Testing atmospheric fading of dyed cotton and rayon. Am. Dyest. Rep. 58: 28-29.


Salvin, V. S.; Walker, R. A. (1959) Relation of dye structure to properties of disperse dyes:
       part I—anthraquinone blues. Am. Dyest. Rep.  48: 35-43.
                     •N

Salvin, V. S.; Paist, W. D\; Myles, W. J. (1952) Advances in theoretical and practical studies of gas fading.
       Am. Dyest. Rep. 14: 297-304.


Schubert, R. (1978) Interaction of NOX and Cu at various relative humidities. J. Electrochem. Soc.
       125: 1114-1116.


Sherwood, S.; Davidson, C.; Dolske, D.; Gatz, D.; Hicks, B.; Hosker, R.;  Langmuir, D.; Linzey, R.;
       Lipfert, F.; Mossotti, V. G.; Schmiermund, R. L.; Spiker, E. C. (1990) Processes of deposition to
       structures.  Washington, DC: National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program; State of science and
       technology report no. 20.


Spence, J. W.;  Haynie, F.; Upham,  J. B. (1975) Effects of gaseous pollutants on paints: a chamber study.
       J. Paint Technol. 47: 57-63.


Spence, J. W.;  Haynie, F. H.; Stiles, D. C.; Edney, E. O. (1988)  A study of the effects of dry and wet
       deposition on galvanized steel and weathering  steel: a three-year field exposure. In: Dean, S. W.;
       Lee, T. S., eds. Degradation of metals in the atmosphere: proceedings of the symposium on corrosion of
       metals; May 1986; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia,  PA: American Society for Testing and Materials;
       pp.  339-353.  (ASTM special technical publication 965).


Spicer, C. W.; Coutant, R. W.; Ward, G. F.; Joseph, D. W.;  Gaynor, A. J.; Billick, I. H. (1987) Rates and
        mechanisms of NO2 removal from indoor air by residential  materials. In: Seifert, B.; Esdorn, H.;
        Fischer, M.; Rueden, H.; Wegner, J., eds. Indoor air '87:  proceedings of the 4th international
        conference on indoor air quality and climate, v. 1, volatile  organic compounds, combustion gases,
        particles and fibres, microbiological agents; August; Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany. Berlin,
        Federal Republic of Germany: Institute for Water, Soil and Air Hygiene; pp. 371-375.


Svedung, O. A.; Johansson, L.-G.; Vannerberg, N.-G.  (1983) Corrosion of gold-coated contact materials
        exposed .to humid atmospheres containing low concentrations  of SO2 and NO2. IEEE Trans. Compon.
        Hybrids Manuf. Technol. CHMT-6: 349-355.


 Tombach, I. (1982) Measurement of local climatological and air pollution factors affecting stone decay.  In:
        Conservation of historic stone buildings and monuments: report of the Committee on Conservation of
        Historic Stone Buildings and Monuments.  Washington, DC: National Academy Press; pp. 197-210.


 Vijayakumar, R.; Mansfeld, F.; Henry, R.  (1989) Investigation of the effects of acid deposition on materials
        [final report]. Camarillo, CA: Combustion Engineering, Environmental Monitoring 'and Services, Inc.;
        contract nos.  A4-110-32 and A5-137-32 for California Air  Resources Board, Sacramento, CA.
          August 1991
                                                  12-35    DRAFT  - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Voytko, J. E.; Guilinger, T. R. (1988) Effectiveness of electrodeposited coatings in reducing atmospheric
       corrosion of copper substrates. Proc. AESF Annu. Tech. Conf. 75: C-3,  llpp.


Webster, R. P.; Kukacka, L. E. (1985) Effects of acid deposition on the properties of Portland cement concrete
       state-of-knowledge. Research Triangle Park, NC:  U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Atmospheric
       Sciences Research Laboratory; EPA report no. EPA-600/3-85/011. Available from: NTIS, Springfield,
       VA; PB85-171452.


Whitbeck, M. R.; Jones, D. A. (1987) Effects of temperature, humidity, nitrogen dioxide and nitric acid gases
       on carbon-steel, galvanized, and painted steel. Reno, NV: University of Nevada, Water Resource Center;
       report no. ARB-R-87/310.  Available from: NTIS; Springfield, VA; PB88-130661.


Yocom, J. E.; Baer, N. S. (1983) Effects on materials: the acid deposition phenomenon and its effects.
       Washington, DC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development; EPA
       report no. EPA-600/8-83-016B.


Zeronian, S. H.; Alger, K. W.; Omaye, S. T. (1971) Reaction of fabrics made from synthetic fibers to air
       contaminated with nitrogen dioxide, ozone, or sulfur dioxide. In: Englund, H. M.; Beery, W. T., eds.
       Proceedings of the second international clean air congress; December 1970; Washington, DC.
       New York, NY: Academic Press;  pp. 468-476.
                                                                    *U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1W2-64S-003>40671
        August 1991
                                                12-36   DRAFT - DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

-------

-------

-------

-------
m
"U
    Q) O
       CD
O  •<
p  _
So  o 5
«b  " '-
    ;:• n>

    I a
    to
»
> m i
(Q D
(I) <

II
   3
   CD
   T)

   s

   (D
   O

   o'
   3
                  Q. =•
                       .
                  c±. o

                  0 =

-------