US Army Corps
       of Engineers
       Construction Engineering
       Research Laboratory
                      Sponsored By
                     University of Pittsburgh
                    In Cooperation With
U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency
 U.S. National
Science Foundation
Proceedings:
••••••I
FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
ON FIXED-FILM  BIOLOGICAL  PROCESSES
April 20-23,1982
Kings Island, Ohio
Edited by Y.C. Wu, Ed D. Smith,
     R.D. Miller, and E.J. Opatken
                       VOl.   II

-------

-------
            UPGRADING ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS WITH
                ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTORS
     Roger C.  Ward.  Project Manager, Howard'Needles Tammen
     and Bergendoff,  Indianapolis,  Indiana.

     James F.  Goble.   Superintendent, Crawfordsville Waste-
     water Treatment  Plant,  Crawfordsville, Indiana.
INTRODUCTION                                 '

     The City of Crawfordsville, Indiana, is a community of
approximately 13,000 residents and has a diverse industrial
base.  The major industrial wastewater sources are metal
plating, printing, and wire fabrication operations.  Waste-
water flow from industry constitutes approximately 25% of the
total plant flow.
     The original wastewater treatment plant, constructed in
1940, was a 1.0 million gallon per day (MGD) primary and con-
ventional activated sludge facility.  Expansion projects
through 1970 increased plant treatment capacity to 1.8 MGD by
expansion of the primary and secondary tankage and aeration
blower system capacity.
     In 1977, with Federal and State financial assistance, the
design of yet another improvement project commenced.  Facility
planning recommended the expansion of the average daily treat-
ment capacity of the plant to 3.4 MGD and the incorporation of
advanced wastewater treatment facilities (i.e., tertiary fil-
tration).  The most cost-effective approach  for upgrading the
existing activated sludge process to accommodate the increased
                           617

-------
design organic loading was determined to be the installation
of a fixed-film biological "roughing" (pretreatment) process
so as to reduce the organic loading imposed on the existing
activated sludge aeration tankage.  On the basis of, costs and
operational flexibility, mechanically driven rotating biologi-
cal contactors (RBC's), rather than trickling filters, were
selected as the biological roughing process.  Other additions
and modifications to the facility included:  expansion of the
primary and secondary tankage, raw sewage pumping and aeration
blower system capacity, addition of dual media filtration,
dissolved air flotation thickening of waste activated sludge,
and belt filter press dewatering of the anaerobically digested
sludge.  A schematic of the overall treatment process is pre-
sented on Figure 1 and related design data is summarized in
Table I.  RBC tank layout, is shown on Figure 2.
     This paper presents:
     1. The design methodology used for the sizing and layout
        of the RBC units;

     2. A comparison of the full-scale operational data
        collected since November, 1979 to the performance
        predicted by the design methodology;

     3. The operational factors which affected the performance
        of the RBC units; and

     4. The enhancements to the overall plant performance
        (e.g., nitrification and secondary clarification)
        which are attributed to the RBC process.

RBC DESIGN METHODOLOGY

     The surface area requirement of the RBC's was generally
based upon achieving a 50% reduction of the soluble five-day
biochemical oxygen demand (SBOD,-) of the wastewater ahead of
the activated sludge process.  Design methods (published in
RBC manufacturer catalogs prior to 1977) for determining the
required surface area typically did not address the biological
roughing application and did not consider applications for
which the effluent SBOD,- would intentionally exceed 25 mg/1.
However, Antonie(l) proposed a design method and model equa-
tion for multiple stage RBC's that did address the cases for
which the effluent SBOD^ would be in excess of 25 mg/1.  Fig-
ure 3 illustrates that design method, gives the model equation
for the original sizing of the RBC's, and shows an example of
predicting full-scale performance.
                            618

-------
fe
o
                                                               o
                                                               I
                                                               UJ
                                                               en '
                                                              t£
                                                              S"-|
                     619

-------
                           TABLE  I

                      PLANT DESIGN DATA
Raw Wastewater Strength




Raw Wastewater Flow



Flow Equalization Basin

Raw Sewage Pumping


Primary Settling Tanks

Rotating Biological Contactors

Aeration Tanks

Air Blowers

Secondary Settling Tanks

Filter Feed Pumps

Dual Media Gravity Filters

Anaerobic Digesters

Dissolved Air Flotation Unit

Sludge Dewatering Belt Presses
180 mg/1 BOD5 (five-day
 biochemical oxygen demand)
190 mg/1 TSS (total suspended
 solids)

Average, 3.4 MGD (million
 gallons per day)
650,000 gallon capacity

6 - 1400 GPM (gallons per
 minute) pumps

8-10 Ft.  x 35 Ft. units

4 - 96,000 Sq. Ft. units

4 - 112,000 gallon tanks

2250 CFM capacity

4-20 Ft.  x 122 Ft. units

2 - 2850 GPM pumps

6 - 11.5 Ft. x 11.5 Ft. filters

2 - 35,000 Cu. Ft. units

1 - 35 Ft.  diameter unit

2-2 meter units
                           620

-------
                                                                      o


                                                                   CM  <
                                                                   a  <
                                                                      o
                                                                      m
                                                                      o:

«
r •
, — i —
t. .

f
it
T
1

• .
»
if
n


t
it

1
i
v 	 -.^* — ^ — ». 	 ^

i
i


. -. t »
\- j

iit
O.U1
2
                       621

-------
                                        U
                                        O
                                        o
'did oooi-AOT/sai)
  SQOS anamos
622

-------
     The actual design technique involved several trial and
error solutions.  Four standard size 25 ft. x 12 ft. diameter
(100,000 sq.ft. of media per unit) RBC units were determined
to be necessary to meet the process requirements for 50% SBOD,.
reduction, if the RBC units were operated as a two-stage pro-
cess.  System flexibility was maximized by configuring the
four units side-by-side and fabricating each unit with two
distinct media sections.  See Figure 2.  This configuration
permits the isolation of any one RBC unit (for maintenance)
and either a single or two-stage process.  Approximately 4%
of the media is removed to affect the division of the RBC
media into two distinct media sections.  As a result, the
actual surface area of the media of each RBC unit was 96,000
rather than 100,000 sq.ft.  The actual total design surface
area of media was 384,000 sq.ft.
     The single stage design example is presented on Figure 3.
The single stage, rather than the two-stage design example is
presented because the RBC units were started up as a single
stage process and have remained as a single stage process.
The performance of the RBC units has not yet required a change
to the two-stage process.
     The final design effluent SBODc for a single stage
process was determined on Figure 3 as follows:

     1.  Calculate the design hydraulic loading.

         Design Flow =3.4 MGD plus 10% for recycle streams-=
                       3.7 MGD

         Design Media Surface Area =384,000 sq.ft.

         Design Single Stage Hydraulic Loading =3,700,000
                       gallons per day (gpd) ? 384,000 sq.ft.
                       = 9.6 gpd/sq.ft.

     2.  Find  the slope of  the hydraulic loading  line on
         Figure 3, at the design hydraulic loading of 9.6
         gpd/sq.ft.

         The dimensions [gpd/sq.ft.] are equivalent  to:
               [Ibs. SBODr removed/(day - 1000 sq.ft.)]
                        Img/1 SBOD5 removed]

             •x 1,000/8.34  Ibs./gal.
                            623

-------
         Therefore,  to express the design hydraulic loading
         of 9.6 gpd/sq.ft.  in terms of the slope dimensions
         on Figure 3,  the hydraulic loading is multiplied by
         8.34 Ibs. per gal./I,000.

                      0 ,   ,,   .      8.34 Ibs./gal.
                      9.6 gpd/sq.ft. x  	17000   	  =

                0.08 Ibs. SBOD5 Removed/(Day-1,000 sq.ft)
                          mg/1 SBOD5 Removed

         A simple graphical display of the calculated slope
         is determined by arbitrarily selecting the Y-co-
         ordinate as 3.0 and computing the X-coordinate:
         X-coordinate
                        Y-coordinate
                           slope
                        3.0
                        0.08
- 37
         Therefore, the slope of the design hydraulic
         loading line is arbitrarily shown on Figure 3 as
         intersecting the Y-axis at 3.0 and X-axis at 37.

     3.  Find the single stage design effluent SBOD5, given
         the designed hydraulic loading rate of 9.6 gpd/
         sq.ft. and the design influent SBOD,- as 79 mg/1.

              Shift the hydraulic loading line so that it
              intersects the X-axis at 79 mg/1.  The X-coor-
              dinate of the point of intersection of the
              shifted hydraulic loading line with the design
              curve is the design effluent SHOD,- which is
              shown as 49 mg/1.

     Although a single stage configuration did not predict a
50% reduction in SBOD,- at the design single stage hydraulic
and organic loading, the two-stage configuration did predict a
conformance with the basic design requirement.

EVALUATION OF DESIGN METHODOLOGY

     Table II lists the monthly operating data of the RBC
units, and contains two columns which readily indicate the
                             624

-------
                11
               CQ Cfl
               W XI
                ~^
             U  CO O
             •O  O CM
             >> i-J O
O   O  O  . O  CO
                             m   m   cn
                                -3-

                                -3-
                                                                                                  in   cn  m   CM
                                                                                                                               in   r^

                                                                                                                               CM   CM
                         m


                         1
                         CM

                         1
                                                         in   vo  in
co

 I
co

 I
in

 I
                                                                                                               O
                                                                                                               rH

                                                                                                                1
                cn   cn   m
                                                rH
                                                
                          o
                          2:
                                                   •u   >
                                                   rj   o
                                                   O   K
                                      I
 3
^
                                                                                                                          ex  4J
                                                                                                                          01   U
                                                                                                                         ov  O
                                                              >   o
                                                              O   01
                                                             z  o
                                                                                                                                             G
                                                                                                                                             00
                                                                                                                                             •H
                                                                                                                                             01
                                                                                                                                             01 ,
                                                                                                                                             a
                                                                                                                                                                  a.  ra
                                                                                                                                                                  g  "
                                                                                                                                                                  to
                                                                                                                                        a) r-i
                                                                                                                                        u nj  a)
                                                                                                                                        •H g  4-J
                                                                                                                                        EO ^ *H
                                                                                                                                        O O  0}
                                                                                                                                        D. C  O
                                                                                                                                                         6
                                                                                                                                                         O  01
                                                                                                                                                         O  >-i
                                                                                                                                                            01

                                                                                                                                                         3  3
                                                                                                                                                         O  CO
                                                                                                                                                                  CM  E
                                                                                                                                                                     to  co
                                                                                                                                                                  G  M  rH
                                                                                                                                                                  o
                                                                                                                                                                  C. 01  14-4
                                                                                                                                                                  3  4J   o
                                            •a  to
                                            mo
                                            to
                                            to
                                                                                                  B
                                                                                                  o
                                                                                               a. g
                                                                                               E
                                                                                                                                        -.  C  G
                                                                                                                                           CJ -H
                                                                                                                                         01     E
                                                                                                                                         ,4

                                                                                                                                            to

                                                                                                                                         C  3  O
                                                                                                                                         MOO.



                                                                                                                                       •  O  V4 *O
                                                                                                                                        •rt  3  0)
                                                                                                                                         4J  O  M
                                                                                                                                         CO 4H  tO
                                                                                                                                         M    XI
                                                                                                                                         01  >-,
                                                                                                                                         P-  V4  0)
                                                                                                                                         O  01  01
                                                                                                                                            >  00
                                                                                                                                         CO  01  to
                                                                                                                                         00     14
                                                                                                                                         to  c  oi
                                                                                                                                         4-J  01  >
                                                                                                                                         to ^  to
                                                                                                                                            trj
                                                                                                                                         01  4-1  >,
                                                                                                                                                                  •H i-l  G
                                                                                                                                                                  « 0.0

                                                                                                                                                                  00 to
                                                                                                                                                                  c to  ai
                                                                                            3  10
                                                                                           •O  l-i  01
                                                                                               00 >
                                                                                           T3     O
                                                                                           .01 rH XI
                                                                                            4J  tO  CO
                                                                                            •J  G
                                                                                            01  O T3
                                                                                           rH 'H  01
                                                                                           rH 4J  4J
                                                                                            O  U  tO
                                                                                            O  O -H
                                                                                               CXrH
                                                                                            O)  O
                                                                                            J-l  M  tO
                                                                                            0)  CX 4-1
                                                                                            3     tfl
                                                                                               3 Q
                                                                                            0)  O
                                                                                            ^ iH
                                                                                            O U-l   •

                                                                                            CO  X  cfl
                                                                                              •H -a
                                                                                           •a  to  to
                                                                                            01     VJ
                                                                                            4-1 14-1  3
                                                                                            cox:
                                                                                            01    H
                                                                                            to  oo
                                                                                            01  c x:
                                                                                            J-l -H  00
                                                                                            O. 4J  3
                                                                                               to  o
                                                                                            tO 'H  ^4   •
                                                                                            4-1- to x:  x:
                                                                                            CO  G  4J  4J
                                                                                                                                                                      o
                                                                                                                                                                        to  S
                                                                                                                                                                  Q x: is
                                                                                                                                                                  O O G  U
                                                                                                                                                                  pa to 3  01
                                                                                                                                                                  to o) c/3  a.
                                                                              625

-------
validity of the design technique:  predicted effluent SBOD,-
and actual minus predicted effluent SBOD,-.  An example of  now
the predicted effluent SBOD,- values were obtained is illus-
trated on Figure 3 for the September, 1981 data set.  The
slope of the hydraulic loading line was graphically depicted
as follows:

     1. Express the monthly average hydraulic loading of 4.8
        gpd/sq.ft. in terms of the slope dimensions on Figure
        3.

        /  o   j/   t:      8.34 Ibs./gal.
        4.8 gpd/sq.ft. x  	1>OQO  *	  -

              0.04 Ibs. SBODr Removed/(Day - 1,000 sq.ft)
                          mg/1 SBOD,- Removed

     2. Arbitrarily select the Y-coordinate as 3.0 and compute
        the X-coordinate.
        X-coordinate
3.0
0.04
= 75
     3. Draw a line with a slope equal  to  the hydraulic
        loading as intersecting the Y-axis at 3.0 and the X-
        axis at 75.

             The predicted effluent SBOD5  value  of 27 mg/1 was
             found by shifting the hydraulic loading line so
             that it intersects the X-axis at the monthly
             average influent SBOD,- value  of 59  mg/1.  The X-
             coordinate of the point of intersection of  the
             shifted hydraulic loading  line with the design
             curve is the predicted effluent SBOD,- value,
             which is shown as 27 mg/1.

     In general, the actual performance of the RBC units has
been reasonably close to performance predicted by the design
methodology.  The predicted effluent SBODr values of the 1981
data set averaged approximately 90% of  the actual effluent
SBODc values.  December, 1979 to February, 1980, data are not
considered representative of normal performance  because  the
plant received industrial cyanide spills during  December, 1979
and January, 1980.
                           626

-------
RBC PERFORMANCE AND OPERATION

     Figure 4 illustrates that the RBC units consistently
removed 40 to 50% of the influent SBOD5.  The removal rates
did not appear to be significantly affected by hydraulic or
organic loading rates.  For example:  The average hydraulic
loading rate in May, 1981, was 8.5 gpd/sq.ft. and the percent
SBODn removal for that month was 41%; whereas, the average hy-
draulic loading rate in November, 1981, was 4.3  gpd/sq.ft. and
the percent SBOD^ removal for that month was 43%.
     Figure 5 is a plot of the effluent SBOD5 versus SBODc
removal rate and the original design curve.  Most of the 1981
data points are in close agreement with the original design
curve.  Better control of the sludge handling/treatment sludge
recycle streams occurred in 1981 and is considered partly re-
sponsible for the improved performance of the RBC units.  Al-
so, the industrial source of cyanide was  controlled.
     In general, the performance during the summer months was
better than during the winter months.  Performance factors
other than wastewater temperature probably account for  dif-
ference in performance.  The wastewater temperature  does not
fluctuate significantly  (12.0 to 22.0°C).  Furthermore, the
coldest monthly average wastewater  temperature  (12°C) was  re-
corded in February,  1981, but the performance during that
month was a similar  to  the performance  during August,  1981,
when the highest monthly average wastewater temperature (22°C)
was recorded.  Plant operating  personnel  attribute  the  sea-
sonal performance differences to an  increase of  sludge  hand-
ling/treatment recycle  streams  (e.g., anaerobic  digester
supernate) during the winter months  due to periodic  interrup-
tions of  the  disposal  operations of  liquid digested  sludge  and
lower primary digester  temperature.
     The  daily average  SBOD,-  loading exceeded  a RBC  manu-
facturer's (2) recommended  limit  of  4.0  Ibs. SBOD5/(day-1000
sq.ft.) for  10 out  of the  26  months  of  operation listed.
Plant operating  personnel  daily  have checked  the bio-film  of
the RBC units  for  patches  of  white  growth (which is  a  visual
indication of undesireable  forms of  microbial  life,  presumed
to be beggiatoa),  and have seldom  noted patches of white
growth.
    ; Routinely,  the  plant operating personnel exercise buried
drain valves  in  order to assure valve operability.   Signifi-
cant  amounts  of  sludge had been noted to  be  withdrawn during
                              627

-------
to
          q
          CM'

0001 -AVQ/SQ1)
                                                               CO
                                                               LU
                                                               cr
                                                            o  .
                                                            il£
                                                               z
                                                               Q
                                                                
                              Q08 3190105
                        628

-------
                                              o
                                              z
                                              Ul
                                              o
                                              UJ
                                        < oo
                                        (T-
                                        UJ O
                                        Q.UJ
                                        OQ
                                                      < f-
                                                      IT- .
                                                      UJ O
                                                      Q- UJ
                                                      OQ
                                                                            85s
                                                                         10
                                                      ui
                                                      cc
         0
                                                                     O
                                                                     CO
                                                                                     20

                                                                                     8i
                                                                                     oc
                                                                                     5
                                                                                     O
                                                                                     o
                                                                     •8
                                                                   ..o
                                                                     o
                                                                     OJ
ID
rr>
O
to
                   CJ
Q
CJ
                                                          in
       '(zidOOOi-AW/sai)
                                           saoa  3iamos
                                        629

-------
the routine exercise of the RBC tank drain valves.  Impressed
by the amount of sludge withdrawn, the operating personnel de-
cided to withdraw sludge from the RBC tanks on a regular
basis.  Coincidental with the decision to periodically with-
draw sludge from the RBC tanks, the plant operating personnel
also noticed that the white patchy growth on  the bio-film
appeared less frequently.  Sludge is withdrawn routinely 2 to
3 times per week and more often if white patchy growth
develops.
      An attempt was made to correlate SBOD^  removal
efficiency with the practice of routine sludge withdrawal from
the RBC tanks.  Sludge was withdrawn from only two of the four
RBC tanks during the period of November, 1981 through
February, 1982.  The daily average effluent SBOD5 of the
drained and undrained tanks was nearly identical during the
trial period.   Even though the data generated during the
trial period did not support the assumption that periodic
sludge withdrawal has a beneficial impact upon SBOD,- removal,
the plant operating personnel have maintained their periodic
sludge withdrawal operation and have seldom observed white
patchy growth.

AFFECT OF THE RBC PROCESS ON OVERALL PLANT PERFORMANCE

     Table III lists the 1981 monthly operational data of the
RBC and activated sludge processes.  The secondary effluent
typically was nitrified and had a total suspended solids con-
centration less than 20 mg/1.  The biological roughing of the
RBC process not only reduced the SBOD,- load to the activated
sludge process, but was also likely responsible for the excel-
lent quality of the secondary effluent.  Both the nitrifica-
tion and the excellent secondary clarification that occurred
would not have been anticipated for an activated sludge pro-
cess which operated at an F/M ratio greater than 0.20/days,
mean cell residence time less than 4.5 days,  and a hydraulic
detention time less than 4 hours.
     In addition to SBODc removal, the RBC process converted
the form of the suspended solids entering the RBC's from a
very non-descriptive particle type to noticeably long, dark,
stringy biological solids.  This formulation  of biological
solids ahead of aeration may be one of the enhancement factors
that an RBC process lends to the activated sludge process.
                          630

-------
                  C  -J  en ot
                  0 uj as  8
                  cj r; z ^
                                                V
                                                                    V    V    V    V    V
sa
CJ)

S
cu  <
CJ  H

gg


oil
Ed  H

.
01 cl CO
cj oi o
T3 -^
a -H
CO CO 01
oi 0) 6

H
cil o »

" co cJ ^
ill I
Q CO
O C CO
-H O3 rJ
JJ S
CO £>l
os a co
. ••• co
iJ 01
*~* cu
c->
fc
O
C 000
o m c o

LJ rr\ a m
CO -3" CM rH . rH rH




m eg



's »
0 c







CO O
o m
_J rvl
                                                                                                                                              ra
                                                                                                                                             •a
                                                                                                                                              c
                                                                                                                                              o
                                                                                                                                              o
                                                                                                                                              ai
                                                                                                                                              CO

                                                                                                                                             •a  .
                                                                                                                                              C!
                                                                                                                                              ra

                                                                                                                                              0)
                                                                                                                                              oo
                                                                                                                                             13
                                                                                                                                              3
                                                                                                                                      01
                                                                                                                                      "O
                                                                                                                                      c
                                                                                                                                      01
                                                                                                                                      D.
                                                                                                                                      CO
                                                                                                                                      3
                                                                                                                                      •a
                                                                                                                                      ai
                                                                                                                                           •   M
                                                                                                                                      u-i  in  co
                                                                                                                                      O  C'--^
                                                                                                                                          O
                                                                                                                                      B^3  rO  *O
                                                                                                                                      O      (U
                                                                                                                                      1^  rH   4-»
                                                                                                                                          CTJ   W
                                                                                                                                      [>i  *J   TO
                                                                                                                                      rH  O   3
                                                                                                                                      0)  H
                                                                                                                                      W      CO
                                                                                                                                      co  *J  *a
                           o
                         ooo
                      me o
                     a «H IH
                     o "a  i
                     M  CO  >>
                     C/3  O  CO
                        t-J a
                     o    /—*
                     •H  OttM
                     rH  C  "
                     3 -H fc
                     CO 73 "-^
                     U  CO O
                     •O  O OH
                     >v t-J O
                                                       -3-

                                                       -3-
0
rH
in

en
CM
o

in r~*
CM -T
CM CM
O O

OO
CM
CO
O
vo
rH
CM
O
O
O
o
CM
O

00
rH
O

in
00
tH
o

-3-
rH
O
ON
in
rH
O

rH
OO
rH
O

O
en
in

                                                                                                                                      X  3, O
                                                                                                                                      O rH  c/3
                                                                                                                                      ^ U-l
                                                                                                                                      O. «-l   CO
                                                                                                                                      D. U  J3
                                                                                                                                      CO     rJ
                                                                                                                                         u
                                                                                                                                      CO CO   ?-,
                                                                                                                                      CO K  .0
                                                                                                                                          CD  t-J
                                                                                                                                      T3  4-1
                                                                                                                                      01  CO   CO
                                                                                                                                      T3  B  rH
                                                                                                                                      C -H   CO
                                                                                                                                      01  X   3
                                                                                                                                      o.  o   cr
                                                                                                                                      CO  ^   01
                                                                                                                                      3  O.
                                                                                                                                      CO  D.  01
                                                                                                                                          CO   €
                                                                                                                                      a)     -H
                                                                                                                                      rH  CO' H
                                                                                                                                      •H -H
                                                                                                                                      U      01
                                                                                                                                      co  in  o
                                                                                                                                      r-< a   a
                                                                                                                                      O O   01
                                                                                                                                      > pa  -a
                                                                                                                                         en  -H
                                                                                                                                       -      co
                                                                                                                                      h u  ai
                                                                                                                                      o  G  os
                                                                                                                                      3  0)
                                                                                                                                      cr  3  rH
                                                                                                                                      •H rH  rH
                                                                                                                                      rJ «-l  01
                                                                                                                                         u-<  O
                                                                                                                                      •o in
                                                                                                                                      01     B
                                                cd
                                                2
                                                                                   CO
                                                                                   3
                                                                                                             co


                                                                                                              o
                                                                                   631

-------
CONCLUSIONS

     The design method for RBC sizing proposed by Antonie(l)
and as presented on Figure 3 is a valid design method for
sizing a RBC process as a biological roughing process ahead of
an activated sludge process.
     Using a RBC process as a biological roughing process
ahead of an activated sludge process is a workable and cost-
effective method for upgrading an existing activated sludge
process.
     Periodic sludge withdrawal from RBC tanks may help
prevent white patchy growth on the RBC bio-film.
      Sludge handling/treatment recycle streams adversely
affect RBC performance.
     The RBC biological roughing process enhances overall
plant performance by producing biological solids which en-
courage nitrification within the activated sludge process and
aid in secondary effluent clarification.

REFERENCES

1.   Antonie, R. L., "Rotating Biological Contactor for
     Secondary Wastewater Treatment," presented at the Gulp/
     Wesner/Culp WWT Seminar on October 27-28, 1976, held at
     South Lake Tahoe, Stateline, Nevada.

2.   Autotrol Wastewater Treatment Systems Design Manual,
     dated 1979, by Autotrol Corporation Bio-systems Division,
     Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
                           632

-------
       USE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AERATION AND PH ADJUSTMENT
                  TO IMPROVE NITRIFICATION
    IN A FULL SCALE ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR SYSTEM
     James L.  Albert. U.S. Army Environmental Hygiene Agency,
     Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.
INTRODUCTION

     Nitrification was substantially improved following the
installation of supplemental.aeration in a full scale rotating
biological contactor (RBC) system designed to treat domestic
wastewater to an effluent level of 10 mg/L of 5-day total
biochemical oxygen demand (BOD^) and 2 mg/L ammonia-nitrogen
(NH^-N). A slight improvement in nitrification was also
observed when the pH of the wastewater was adjusted from 6.6 to
3.4 with soda ash for an extended period. This RBC system is
the biological treatment portion of a 6 MGD wastewater treatment
plant (WWTP) serving a major U.S Army installation with an
effective population of 40,000. The RBC units are arranged in
6 treatment banks of 6 stages each with the first.3 stages in
each bank intended for BOD, removal and the last 3 stages for
NH -N removal. Performance3of the RBC system was evaluated
during  summer conditions (wastewater temperature of 26° C and
system  flow of 4.5 MGD) before  and after the addition of 8 cfm
of supplemental aeration per lineal foot of RBC shaft in the
first 2 stages of each bank. The effect of pH adjustment was
evaluated by comparing a control bank to a parallel bank in
which up to 1200 pounds per  day of soda ash was added to the
third stage for 7 weeks.
     " The  opinions  or  assertions  contained  herein  are  the
 private views  of  the author  and are  not  to  be  construed  as
 official or  as reflecting  the  views  of the  Department  of the
 Army or the  Department of  Defense."
                             633

-------
      Prior  to  the  aeration  of  the wastewater,  dissolved
oxygen  (DO)  limiting  conditions  (1.0 mg/L  or  less)  existed
in  the  first 4 stages,  the  white sulfur  bacteria, Beggiatoa,
predominated on the media,  75% of the  BOD^-S  (soluble) re-
moval occurred in  the first 3  stages,  and  59%  of  the  applied
NH,-N was oxidized.   With the  supplemental aeration,  DO was
never less  than 1.5 mg/L, Beggiatoa was  sparsely  present on
only  the first stage  media,  96%  of the BOD..-S  removal
occurred in the first 3  stages,  and 86%  of the NH3~N  was
oxidized yielding  an  effluent  concentration of 2.1 mg/L.
The design  nitrification rate  of 0.3 pounds of NHo-N  removed
per 1000 ft^ per day  existed only when the DO  level was above
2.5 mg/L.   Although adjustment of pH produced  questionable
results, an 11% improvement in NF^-N removal was  briefly
observed as  compared   to the control bank  with just supple-
mental  aeration.

     Conclusions are  that NH3-N  removal  is  dependent  on
prior 6005-3 removal  so  that there is  not  competition be-
tween 3005  and NH3~N  removal organisms for  space  in the
latter  stages.  Low DO spread BOD--S removal into  stages where
nitrification  was  to  occur.  More importantly, the nitrifi-
cation  rate was  limited  by  low DO levels.   The need to pro-
vide at least  2.5 mg/L of DO in  the stages  where maximum
nitrification  is expected was  clearly  shown.   Some benefit
may be  gained  through operation  in higher  pH ranges;  however,
the design nitrification rate  was achieved  in  the 6.6 pH
range.

BACKGROUND

     Treatment  Plant

     The WWTP  was upgraded  in  1977 from  a  trickling filter
system  to a RBC system in order  to provide  both secondary
treatment and  nitrification.   The upgraded  plant was
designed to meet the  National  Pollutant  Discharge Elimina-
tion System (NPDES) permit  limitations shown in Table 1.   A
schematic diagram of  the unit  processes  is  shown in Figure
1.  Design capacity of the WWTP  is 6 MGD, while maximum
hydraulic capacity is 18 MGD.

     The RBC system,   shown  in  Figure 2,  consists of 36
mechanically driven RBC units  arranged in a matrix of -6
treatment banks, each with  6 stages.   The first 3 stages
                           634

-------
   TABLE 1.  NPDES Permit Parameters and Limitations
Parameter

pH

Chlorine Residual


Fecal Coliform (FC)

Suspend Solids (SS)

Five-day Biochemical
  Oxygen Demand (BOD-)

Ammonia Nitrogen (NH_-N)

Dissolved Oxygen (DO)
  Monthly Average, Summer
(May 1 through October 31)

6.0 - 9.0

Min cone to comply with
  FC limit

200/100 mL

30 mg/L

10 mg/L


2.0 mg/L

>6.0 mg/L
                          635

-------
636

-------
                                   2 u
                                   a  CL
                                   •n o
637

-------
in each bank have regular density media (100,000 ft ) for BOD-
removal; the last 3 have high density   (150,000 ft2) for
NH3~N removal.  The RBC shaft with media measures 25 ft long
and 12 ft in diameter.  Each RBC is positioned in a concrete
tank with an approximate volume of 16,500 gal.  The stages
are separated by underflow baffles which provide plug flow
through the bank.  Based on a dye study (1), the hydraulic
detention time across 6 stages is 2 hours and 30 minutes at
a flow rate of 5.5 MGD.

     The BOD5 removal part of the RBC system was designed
based on hydraulic loading (gpd/ft2) versus BOD^ removal
(per cent) curves using an influent BOD5 concentration of
140 mg/L.  The overall hydraulic loading is 1.33 gpd/ft2 at
the 6 MGD design flow.  Specific removal rates were used to
size the NH3-N removal part of the RBC system.  The design
was based on an influent NH3-N concentration to stage 4 of
15.8 mg/L.  A removal rate of 0.28 pounds NH3~N removed per
1000 ft2 of media surface per day was used for NHg-N removal
down to 5 mg/L.  Removal from 5 to 2 mg/L is to be done at
0.20 pounds NH3~N removed per 1000 ft2 per day(l).

     Previous Studies

     Summer and winter studies (August 1978 and January 1979)
were conducted by Hitdlebaugh and Miller (1, 2, 3) to evaluate
the performance of the upgraded WWTP,  They found that the
RBC system performed at less than design expectations for
BODc and NH3~N removal.  This was attributed both to DO
limiting conditions (less than 1 mg/L) in several RBC stages
and to relatively low pH (less than 7.0) in the latter RBC
stages.  During the winter study when DO limiting conditions
did not exist, the RBC system actually removed more NH^-N than
during the summer study in spite of the winter wastewater
temperature of 13 C.  Analyses of samples for BODj-S and
nitrification-suppressed BOD5 was found to be essential for
the evaluation of WWTP's designed for nitrification.  Recom-
mendations for future RBC system designs called for the use
of supplemental aeration to overcome limiting DO levels and
chemical feed to maintain optimum pH levels.
                            638

-------
     Supplemental Aeration


     A supplemental aeration  system was  installed  in February
1981 to improve BOD  and NH_-N removal in  the RBC  system. An
equally important benefit was expected to  be the physical
stripping of excess attached  biological  growth, thereby reducing
the possibility of further RBC shaft failures. Between May  1980
and August 1981, 4 stages had become non-operational due to
shaft failure. Diffusers were installed  in the first 2 working
stages of each bank as shown  in Figure 2.  The circular coarse
bubble diffusers (4 per shaft) are offset  from the shaft center
plumb line by about 2 ft. Clearance between the RBC media and
tank bottom ranges from 6 in. at stage 1 to 15 in. at stage 6.
Air is provided by 2 blowers, each with  1200 cfm capacity.
Shaft weight measurement devices called  "load cells" were also
installed at this time on bank 4. Using  these load cells, the
operators can make adjustments to the air  flow rate to insure
that the maximum shaft weight specified  by the manufacturer is
not exceeded.


METHODOLOGY

     Objectives and Materials


     The objectives of this study were to  evaluate the effect
of the supplemental aeration on the RBC  system performance and
to assess the potential benefit from pH  adjustment by chemical
addition to levels considered optimum for  nitrification. Since
the NH_-N discharge limit had always been  exceeded in the month
of August (highest wastewater temperature  and lowest DO) and
since the August 1978 study by Hitdlebaugh  and Miller provided
an excellent baseline for conditions existing prior to the use
of supplemental aeration, August 19-25,  1981 was selected for
the study period. RBC bank 4  (see Figure 2) had suffered no
structural damage and continued, as in the  previous study, to
be used as the primary bank to evaluate  the internal performance
of the RBC system. Because bank 3most resembles  bank 4, it was
used as the experimental pH adjustment bank. The decision to
add soda ash at the end of stage 3 (see Figure 2) was based
primarily on pilot scale RBC studies done  by Stratta and Long(4).
Their studies indicated that pH adjustment with soda ash yielded
NH^-N removal as good as   with lime and did not cause solids
precipitation problems. Their studies also  showed that the
nitrifying organisms need 5 weeks to acclimate to a higher pH.
                               639

-------
     A chemical feed system consisting of a 500 gal. tank with
flash mixer and a 30 gpm capacity centrifugal pump was operated
for 7 weeks before the August sampling period. Soda ash solu-
tions were made 4 times per day using either 300 Ibs. (7.2 %
solution) or 400 Ibs. (9.6 % solution) of dry soda ash. The
solution was pumped at a constant 1 gpm rate to 2 points
ahead of the effluent baffle in stage 3. The higher concentra-
tion solution was used during the times of the day when peak
wastewater flows occurred. An automatic pH control system,
later seen to be essential, was outside the scope of this
study. Despite equipment problems and washout by rain induced
high flows, the pH in stage 3 was maintained between 8.1 and
9.3 for 4 of the 7 weeks.


     Sampling and Analyses

     The sampling and analytical program from the 1973 study
was duplicated as closely as possible to permit accurate
comparison of results from both studies. Twenty-four hour
flow proportioned composite samples were collected for 7 days
at the RBC system influent and effluent, and at the WWTP
effluent. Grab samples of the RBC bank  influent and waste-
water in each of the 6 stages of banks  3 and 4 were collected
at 5 times during the study to determine changes  in waste-
water characteristics through the RBC system. Sampling times
were selected to correspond to those used  in the  previous
study. Grab samples of the wastewater in stage 6  of the other
4 banks were also collected. Temperature,  DO, and pH  data were
taken during each sample period using portable instruments.
Sample point locations are shown on Figures  1, 2, and 2a.

     All sample analyses were conducted onsite by the Environ-
mental Chemistry Division of the U.S. Army Environmental
Hygiene Agency. A mobile laboratory was set  up at the WWTP  for
both studies. Nitrification was suppressed using  the  ammonium
chloride method (5)  in order to determine  the relative BOD.
exerted by carbonaceous and nitrogenous substances. Tests tor
soluble BOD_ and TOC were conducted on  the filtrate  passing
through a  0?45 micron filter. All  sampling and analyses were
conducted  in accordance with "Standard  Methods for  the Exam-
ination of Water and Wastewater"  (6) or "Methods  for  Chemical
Analysis of Water and Wastes"  (7).
                               640

-------
vO
 (U
 oo
 CD
•60'
 cfl
 fl)
 00
 to
 ao
 to
 CO
 a)
 oo
 to
  so
 .u
 02
-o
 c
 to

m

 to

• c
 CO
 -I
 CO
 C
                                                                                            to
                                                                                            O
                                                                                            O
                                                                                            t,

                                                                                            tO
                                                                                            CO
                                                                                             60
                                                                                             C
                                                                                             CO
                                                                                            CNJ
       C
       C
      • r-l
       j_)
       to
       O
       o
CJ
to
4J
E
Q
u
I — 1
tO
o
60
C
i-H
c
• r-*
O
e.

0)
! 	 1
O.
co
CO

to
^
OS

' CO
        o
        c
        OJ
       -a
                                           641

-------
FINDINGS
     The sulfur oxidizing bacteria, Beggiatoa, which had been
abundant during low DO conditions, was sparsely present on only
the first stage media under the new   aerated conditions. The
biomass growth was much thinner and more uniform  in the aerated
stages, possibly due to physical stripping action of the air.

     Hydraulic and organic loading rates are shown in Table 2.-
Wastewater characteristics (from composite samples), in and out
of the RBC system, and at the WWTP effluent are shown in Tables
3 and 4. The performance (from grab samples) of individual
banks  is shown in Table 5. Changes in wastewater characteristics
(from grab samples) as it passes through each RBC stage are
shown in Tables 6-8 and Figures 3 and 4. BOD.-S and NH -N
removal rates in each stage are shown in Figures  5 and 6.

     Loading and operating conditions were essentially the same
for both studies (Tables 2 and 3). The RBC system effluent
NH--N concentrations were improved from 6.2 mg/L  in 1978 to 2.1
mg/L in 1981 because DO limiting conditions were  eliminated by
the supplemental aeration (Tables 3 and 6, Figure 3). Had all
36 RBC stages been operational, RBC system effluent NH..-N
concentrations would have been in the 1.3 to 1.8  mg/L range
achieved by indivdual banks 1 and 4 (Table 5). As predicted by
Hitdlebaugh and Miller (2,3), the impact of the aeration on
BOD--S removal was not to increase the amount removed (Table 3),
but to concentrate removal in the first 2 stages  (Table 6,
Figure 3) at a higher rate (Figure 5). Because BOD_-S removal
was occurring more efficiently, more space for nitrifying
organisms was available in the early stages and nitrification
actually began in stage 1 (Table 6, Figure 3) with the peak
nitrification rate occurring in stage 3 (Figure 5). Although
BOD- and NH~-N removal organisms do compete for space, the
major factor limiting nitrification was the low wastewater DO
levels (Figure 6). A minimum DO level of 2.0 mg/L available at
the location where nitrification is expected to occur has been
suggested by others (8).  The design nitrification rate (1,9)
was observed at the 2.5 mg/L DO level (Figures 5  and 6). The
largest DO drop across any of the stages was across the stage
with the maximum nitrification rate (Figure 6). This is expected
since NH.,-N removal requires 4.6 times as much DO as BOD--S
removal 18).  Mechanical reaeration from turning RBC media does
not bring the DO level back up to 2.0 mg/L until  2 stages later
(Figure 6);  therefore,  supplemental aeration provided to stage 3
would improve nitrification rates and overall NH  -N removal.
                                642

-------
     The improved NH--N removal by the RBC system can be seen
in the components of total BOD,, in the WWTP effluent (Table 4).
Before aeration, the nitrification process was continuing out
the end of the plant indicated by a total BOD- of 11 mg/L and
nitrogenous BOD,, of 7 mg/L (total minus carbonaceous). With
aeration, nitrification shifted back up into the RBC system
indicated by a total BOD,, of 5 mg/L and nitrogenous BOD, of .
2 mg/L.

     The effects of pH adjustment were disappointing because
it is well documented that higher pH levels (.8.0 to 8.5) are
optimum for nitrification (4), A side by side comparison of
banks 3 and 4, showed no improvement in total NH--N removed
(Table 7), although a different removal rate pattern was
observed. The set of grab samples on August 19 did show an 11%
improvement (Table 8); however, this was questionable because
N07/NO_-N levels did not support the NH -N levels. The major
reason for the poor performance was probably the wide pH fluct-
uations (8.1 to 9.3) inherent in the chemical feed system
which did not let the nitrifying organisms acclimate to a.
constant pH.

     Amazingly, the maximum design nitrification rate of 0.3
Ibs NH_-N removed per 1000 ft  per day was observed at a PH of
6.6 (Figures 4 and 5). The overall NH.,-N removal of 86% was the
same as that found by Stratta and Long (4), but the maximum
removal rate was less than half of their observed value. Under
design load conditions (6 MGD), pH adjustment may be needed to
achieve the desired NH -N removal  with existing media area.

SUMMARY

     The supplemental aeration of the RBC  system eliminated
nuisance organisms, enhanced BOD5~S and NH--N removal, and
provided the operational flexibility to control the thickness
of biomass growth on the media. Placement  of air diffusers in
not only BOD..-S removal stages, but also in NH.,-N removal
stages should be considered. DO levels should Be maintained at
2.5 mg/L in stages where maximum nitrification rates are
expected.
                             643

-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

                                          s
     The author would like to thank Mr. John A. Hitdlebaugh
and Major Roy D. Miller for their helpful advice in the design
of this study. A special thanks is extended to Mr. Charles I.
Noss, Mr. Kenneth A. Bartgis, and Captain Edmund Kobylinski
from the US Army Medical Bioengineering Research and Develop-
ment Laboratory for their efforts in support of the study.
     The data shown in the following Tables and Figures
     from the August 15-21, 1978 study (without supple-
     mental aeration) was extracted from the paper
     entitled "Full-Scale Rotating Biological Contactor
     for Secondary Treatment," fay John A. Hitdlebaugh
     and Roy D. Miller, presented at the first National
     Symposium/Workshop on Rotating Biological Contactor
     Technology, Champion, PA (1980).
                           644

-------
            TABLE 2.   RBC System Loading Rates*
 Location
   August
15-21,  1978
   August
19-25,  1981
Design**
                Hydraulic  Loading (gpd/ft )
 Six  Stages
 First  Stage
     1.0
     7.5
    0.93
    7.0
  1.33
          Organic  Loading  (Ibs  BODs/lOOO ft^/day)
 Six  Stages
 First  Stage
     0.60
     4.5
    0.68
    5.08
  1.56
 11.7
        Organic  Loading  (Ibs'BOD5-S/1000 ft~/day)
Six  Stages
First  Stage
     0.18
     1.31
    0.15
    1.11
  4.0
      *•**
*Based on data  in Table  3.
'""'"Based on design flow of 6.0 MGD,  RBC  influent  concentra-
tion of 140 mg/L BOD5, and RBC  stage  4  influent  concentra-
tion of 15.8 mg/L NH3-N.
-f-^U^j,
   This level recommended to prevent DO limiting conditions
in the first stage (9).
                           645

-------
 TABLE 3.   RBC System Influent and Effluent Characteristics

                       August 15-21,  19782 August 19-25,  19813
                       Avg Flow = 4.5 MGD4 Avg Flow = 4.2    ""
                           Temp = 26°C	Temp
25°C
D
Parameter
Conductivity (umho/cm)
Total Alkalinity
SS
BOD.
BOD^-soluble
TOC3
TOC-soluble
TKN
NH -N
NO /NO -N
Influent
960
158
69
72
21
42
23
21
16.0
0.05
Effluent
930
90
63
61
4
24
11
8.9
6.2
8.9
Influent
890
154
55
87
19
• 55
21
22
16.0
< .01
Effluent
855
84
41
34
4
27
11
6.8
2.1
13
^Values shown are average of 7 - 24 hr composite samples.
^Without supplemental aeration.
.With supplemental aeration.
 Sum of STP influent flow (3.7 MGD) and recirculated flow
.(.8 MGD).
 Sum of STP influent flow (3.9 MGD) and recirculated flow
 (.25 MGD).
 All units are mg/L unless otherwise noted.
                          646

-------
TABLE 4. Wastewater
               2
      Parameter
Treatment Plant Effluent Values

August 15-21, 19783  August 19-25, 19814
pH (Standard units)
BOD - total
BOD_ - soluble
BOD- - carbonaceous
NH3- N
SS
Flow (MGD)
6.7
11
2
4
6.2
9
3.7
6
5
2
3
2
6
3
.9



.6
.4
.9
  ^Values shown are average of 7 - 24 hr composite samples.
  -All units are mg/L unless otherwise noted.
  ,Without supplemental aeration.
  -With supplemental aeration.
   Average of  7 daily measurements made at various times
   with a portable instrument.
                            647

-------
      co
                     CM
                                                 co
                                                                      CO
                                                                                  14-1
          8
       ±J S
       CO
       3 CM
                            CM
                            CM
                                          CM
                                                 CM
                                                        CO
                                                        CO

                                                        in
       a  
-------

















4
CU

CO
4-1
en

^t
f\

01
o
fi
2

j_j
o

s_4
_!)


^-«

"c
CO


O
05



•
^O

•Vj
1 1
pa
 rJ
X) eu

ON CO
r-l 3

« 4-1
r-4 W3
CM 'CO
1 3
in
"""^
4-1 .
3
00
3














Z
|
CO
O
'Z*
CM
O
z:



z\
1
,co

Z






25
^J
£H





CO
i
ir
Q
O
M






O
O





p^«
r—i


•
H





IE




















LO i^*\ ^^ -XJ* CNJ ..^ o^ ' N!)
._( .-^ ,—» r-^ -H r— i "iJ
U™\ W5
.CN ci3
i ^
0*1
rH
;.n m iJ
co co co r^ -o .u^ m co

• rJ
. <



. 4-J
S
3
i — i
M-l r^ CM CO <}• oo i^* in T^ en
CM CM r-l r-l CU CU
4J
o -o
CU r4
r-4 CO
•—4 "^3
0 C
O c3
4J
ON CM r^*» in in vO* ~sj* w M
CM rH !
•1) "3
rJ 3
p . m «
0) O
3 ' rr
. r-4 CU CJ
m i— i o-j co <)• m o soco
C 3 Ci)
1— 1 CU rJ
60 - (1) r4
'O CO > O
PS 4-1 <; u-i
ei en H
649

-------










-4
(0

r-l
O.
S

CO
J.J
rt

O

in

U-4
O

01
co
o
r4
0)
^.
^

1

JJ
c
•u
S

to
•'-i
"O


*— *
a,

U-4
Q

to

O
O
W-l
1- [
—3

^
r-

—2
-5
23

c_4











rjy;
1
CO
O
^
CN
O
Q Z
O
S

0

z
1
II co
1 ffi
"2

p2

i^
0)
c. >•> z
r-l W
S C E-
O O
r— 1
f-( £J
O

O 4-J CO
O (3 1
in 'H m
CM 0) Q
 ,M

3 ~" <

•* 3 •
i— 1 <3 H
CO 03

,— (

n
m _^
^l ~5-
ON
r-4

i j
vs
-J
ap

<^











i-H r-l , •— 1 CM
O O CM r* m O O ,r-4
O O •— I  r^* in vO r-l f^* 'O '^ CO •
1 iQ vp v^Q yr\ v^n v,^ vf^ [— 1 . • i{— > ^^ vO
04
3
CO

• M
4J . CO iJ
a c
0) ^ - D
3 C 3
r-4 fl r-4
«-l •— 1 CM CO <(• m vO pi 14-4 i— 1 CM
3. C
—IS) t— 1 0;
CO M
CJ> S3 CJ nj
=3 ij ;= u
±i CO Ci V2




CO P^
^ r— t— i co
r-H r-l








r-l

o m co CM
r_^





CM ON
• #
m o r- m
r-l r-4







vO ,~O CO CO








~d* \o o i— i
i— 1 i— 1 CM CO







S0 r— i O '"*">
30 r--. m <•
r-4 r-4 r-4 r-4






vD CO O O
r*"^ f^ r^* r^










co -^- m O






CO
OJ
2
• r-4
•^
U-4
0

U
01
to

J)
g
C3
CO

Je
u

4J
C3

-a
0)
^j
a
(D
i—1
r-4
O
o

V} •
CJ sn
i-l 4J
Cu *r^
2 C
« 3
CO
a:
j^i c^
C3
M T3
JO
'4-1 "3
0 C
C3
V] 4J
CU 10
3
O rJ
UJ O
CO "4-

m —
C-
3 O
0 0
r4 r"x
U-l 0)
to — H
•U — ,
r-4 00
3 S
Cfl
D a)
)-l rJ
c3
'4-4
o w
^J
D -H
CO S
nj 3
U
I) r-4
> r-4
*3^ 
-------









.)
w
o
r— I

g
(3
OO

i-Q
ctj
J-4
u

in

u-i
O

4J
to
] j
o

to
4-1
CJ

U-I
(4-1
a


CO

Cd

S3

^_(









2
I
o1
^
OJ
O

Q
O

"**
CO p^
r^ 1
• m

ii gy
•
»M
c
(0
03

r-i >1 2!
 "a
i

4J
to
3
S?

*c








i-l \O
Or— IvOO^O OOCOC7\O
O O r— 1 CO C?l CO  in i— 1 CO in C COCNOO O ( — • m,
CN CN r-4 i— i i— 1 -r-l C-J CN CN r-l r-H

4-1
G
	 g. . ., . .,

4J
to
-^•co^-ooin-^cN 3 COCN if — vovomi~»i~—
CN CN -^ — 1 r-4 i-l CN CMCNCNrUr-lr-(CN
C
o
• ,-4
•u
CO
j^
CU
r^> -^O -^* ^O *xT co o '--O 'vO i ^o ^«o v^c i*^ j"v, \o r*** r*** *co GO r^*- r^*
~*-.
cn

.«
CO - • -(,
4J 4-1 '
<"• ' ^ * C
3 • "a • . a) . -
3 ' co 3
r-H 23 1— 1
i4_ir— icNco in  co
651

-------
        4.0  -r
        3.0  _.
        2.0  -•
    DO
   (ng/D
        1.0
                                    O - Without  supplemental  aeration.

                                    A- With supplemental  aeration.
                 (Supolemental
                    Aeration)
Pounds
:!H3-N

Removed
Per
1000 £t"
Per Dav
             SBC    End of
             Inr    Stage L
           .30 -.
.20 ..
           .10
           Across
           Stages: 1
          Effects of Dissolved Oxygen Concentration on the
          "H,-N  Removal Race (Data from Table i).
             ••                                  f
                                   652

-------
Pounds
BOD -S

Removed
Per
1000 ft"
Per Day
                                  O — Without supplemental aeration,
                                      Bank 4, Aug 1978.
                                  A- With supplemental aeration,
                                      Bank 4, Aug 1981.
                                  Q- With supplemental aeration and
                                      pH adjustment  (soda ash),
                                      Bank 3, Aug 1981.
                (Supplemental
                 Aeration)
Pounds
SH.-N

Remov.ed
Per    „
1000 ft
Per 'Day
       Across
       Stages:  1        2        3         45        6

Figure 5.  Comparison of Removal Rates With and Without Supplemental
           Aeration and pH Adjustment (Based on data in Tables } & 7).
                             653

-------
  pH
 6.8
 6.7
 6.6
 6.5
 6.4
 6.3

160
150


125 .
Total
Alkalinity
        100
 Cmg/L)
  TKN

   6
        75'
         50
         23
         20  • •
 15  ••
         10
 Cmg/L)
         O - Without
             Supplemental
             Aeration
         A - With Supplemental
             Aeration
                (Supplemental Aeration)
                    L\
                                                      TKN
                                                      NO,/NO--N
 Figure
   Comparison of pH, Total  Alkalinity,  TKN, NO,/NO,-N Levels
   Through RBC Bank 4 With  and Without  Supplemental Aeration
   (Data from Table £).
                               654

-------
        4.0 -•
        3.0 ••
   DO
 (mg/L)
300 -S
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
                                  O -Without  supplemental  aeration
                                  A -With  supplemental  aeration.
                        (Supplemental Aeration)
  Figure  3.   Comparison  of  DO,  300,-S,  and NH--N  Levels Through RBC Bank <*

             With  and  Without  Supplemental Aeration  (Data  from Table f).


                                                                    Iff
                              655

-------
ABBREVIATIONS

BODc         5-day total biochemical oxygen demand
BOD--S       Soluble BOD5
CaCO»        Calcium carbonate
cfm          Cubic feet per minute
DO           Dissolved oxygen
Eff          Effluent
FC           Fecal coliform
  2
ft           Square feet
gal          Gallon
      2
gpd/ft       Gallons per day per square foot
gpm          Gallons per minute
in           Inch
Inf          Influent
Ibs          Pounds
mg/L         Milligram per liter
MGD          Million gallons per day
ml           Milliliter
u.mho/cm      Micromhos per centimeter
N            Nitrogen
NH,—N        Ammonia expressed as nitrogen
N00/NO_-N    Nitrite plus nitrate expressed as nitrogen
pEi           Negative logarithm of hydrogen ion concentration
SS           Suspended solids
T Alk        Total alkalinity
Temp  °C     Temperature in degrees centigrade
TKN          Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
TOC          Total organic carbon
TOC-S        Soluble TOC
                             656

-------
REFERENCES


1. Hitdlebaugh, J.A., "Phase I, Water Quality Engineering
   Special Study No. 32-24-0116-79, Sewage Treatment Plant
   Evaluation, Summer Conditions, 14-24 August and 25-29
   September, 1978", U.S. Army Environmental Hygiene Agency
   (1979).
2. Hitdlebaugh, J.A. and Miller, R.D., "Full-Scale Rotating
   Biological Contactor for Secondary Treatment and Nitrifi-
   cation", Proceedings: First National Symposium/Workshop on
   Rotating Biological Contactor Technology, -.Champion, PAC1980).
3. Hitdlebaugh, J.A, and Miller, R.D., "Operating Problems
   with Rotating Biological Contactors", Jour. Water Poll.
   Control Fed., 53, 1283 (1981).
4. Stratta, J.M. and Long, D.A., "Nitrification Enhancement
   Through pH Control with Rotating Biological Contactors",
   Final Report, Institute for Research on Land and Water
   Resources, The Pennsylvania State University (1981).
5. Siddigi, R.H., et al,, "Elimination of Nitrification in the
   BOD Determination with 0.1 M Ammonia Nitrogen", Jour. Water.
   Poll. Control Fed., 39. 579 (1967),                '
6. "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste-
   water", 15th Edition, American Public Health Association,
   Washington, D.C.  (1980).
7. "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", U.S.
   Environ. Protection Agency, EPA-625-16-74-003 (1974).
8. "Process Design Manual for Nitrogen Control", U.S. Environ.
   Protection Agency Tech. Transfer  (1975).
9. Autotrol Corporation, "Wastewater Treatment System Design
   Manual", Milwaukee, WI (1979).
                              657

-------
     APPLICATION OF ROTARY SCREENS,  BIOLOGICAL
     CONTACTORS, AND GRAVITY PLATE SETTLERS TO
      TREAT WASTEWATERS IN HOBOKEN AND NORTH
                BERGEN, NEW JERSEY
     Joseph M. Lynch, P.E.
     President
     Mayo, Lynch and Associates,  Inc.  Hoboken,  N.J.
     U.S.A.

     Jiunn Min Huang, P.E.
     Project Manager
     Mayo, Lynch and Associates,  Inc.  Hoboken,  N.J.
     U.S.A.

     C. H. Joseph Yang, Ph.D.
     Senior Environmental Engineer
     Mayo, Lynch and Associates,  Inc.  Hoboken,  N.J.
     U.S.A.
INTRODUCTION
     A  flow-through  compact   system   composed   of
rotary screens,  biological  contactors, and  gravity
plate settlers was  tested  by Mayo, Lynch  and  Asso-
ciates at a  full-scale  pilot plant in  Hoboken,  New
Jersey for  wastewater  treatment.   The results  of
the pilot plant  study was applied  to  the North Ber-
gen Central Sewerage Treatment  Plant,  North  Bergen,
New Jersey  which was also  designed by Mayo,  Lynch
and   Associates.      The    Utilization   of   this
flow-through   system   for   municipal  wastewater
treatment has been  demonstrated  successfully at  the
North  Bergn SPT.    This   is  the  first full-scale
plant, adopting  the  concept  of  flow-through  compact
system in the world.
                         658

-------
     Tne   flow-through  system   is   composed  of
rotoscreen, biological contactocs and  gravity  plate
settlers.  When  wastewater  flows into this  system,
particles  greater  than  0.02  inch  are  removed by
rotoscreen first.   The  rotoscreen,  which  replaces
of  grit  chamber  and  primary  settling   tank  in
conventional  treatment  system,  has  the function, of
primary -treatment.    The effluent  from  the  roto-
screen then flows.through the biological  contactors
which   could    be   either   rotating    biological
contactors   (RBC)   or  trickling   filters.     The
evaluation of  treatment  levels  at various  rates of
hydraulic  loadings  and biological contactor  stages
was also conducted during the course  of  this study.
The  results   of  the tests  were used  to  establish
guidelines  for  the  design  of  the   North  Bergen
Central Sewage Treatment Plant.
     Some  advantages   of   a  flow-through   system
consisting of  rotoscreens,  biological  contactor  and
gravity  plate   settlers  to  wastewater   treatment
include:      reduced   land   requirements,   reduced
capital  costs as well  as  a reduction in  operation
and   maintenance   costs   when   compared   to   a
conventional  activated  sludge  process  facilities;
ability  to meet  secondary  treatment  requirements-;
ability  to withstand hydraulic  and organic surges;
compatibility in good  settling characteristics  of
sloughed  sludge  with  the  gravity  plate  settlers;
ease  of  operation  and  elimination  of  wind  and
thermal    disturbances.       These    and    other
characteristics  of the  systm were examined during
our   evaluation   of   pilot   the  plant  study,  the
operation  of  the  full scale  North Bergen  Central
Sewage  Treatment Plant demonstrated it.
                            659

-------
     The  object  of  this paper  is  to  present  the
results  o£  an  investigation into  the  feasibility
study  of  a  flow-through   system   for  wastewater
treatment  as  shown  by  results  from  the  Hoboken
Pilot  Plant.   The operation data  of  North Bergen
Central Sewage Treatment Plant, which was  designed
and  incorporates  the results of  the Hoboken  Pilot
Plant  study, were  collected  to  support  the concept
of   the   flow-through   system.     Reluctant  data
concerning  both,    the   pilot   plant   study   and
full-scale treatment plant operation,  are presented
in this paper.
                           660

-------
PLANT OPERATION
     Hoboken Pilot Plant

     The  pilot  plant, was  established  within  the
site of  the Hoboken Treatment  Plant, Hoboken,  New
Jersey.  There were  two flow-through  treatment con-
figurations in the pilot plant  tested in  full scale
operations  to  establish  treatability.   The  first
configuration  consisted of  a rotoscreen,  two-stage
trickling filter  and a  gravity  plate  settler.   The
second  configuration   was   essentially   the   same
except  that  the  two-stage  trickling  filter  was
replaced by a  rotating biological  contactor.   The
raw  wastewater,  which  flowed   to  the   full-scale
pilot plants by  a splitter  box  shown  in Fig  1,  was
pumped  from the  head end  of  the  treatment  plant
just ahead  of grit chambers.  In  this way  no  solids
would  be  'removed prior  to  the  rotoscreen.    The
rotoscreen  is  a  stainless  steel  drum of  which  the
periphery  is  covered with  a stainless  steel  mesh
with 0.02  inch  openings.    The  unit   is so  designed
that the  sewage passes through  the   screen and  the
solid  particles  larger"  than  0.02   inches  become
impinged upon  the screen.   As the drum rotates  the
solids are  scraped off  the  screen thereby  cleaning
the screen.  The  cleaned  portion of   screen is  then
rotated until  it  again  comes  into contact  with  the
raw sewage.                        *
     The
divided
rotating
ter was
tions.
with B.F.
disperse
trickling
installed.
 sewage passing through  the  rotoscreen was
 between   the   trickling   filters  and  the
 biological contactor.   The  trickling fil-
constructed of  steel containing  four sec-
Each  section  has  eight  foot  depth  packed
.  Goodrich vinyl  core  media.   In  order  to
 tne sewage evenly across  the top  of. the
  filter,  16   evenly  spaced  nozzles  were
    The gravity of  flow  of  sewage  ovr the
media  forms  a biological slime  which provides  the
medium for the  biological  treatment.  The  biologi-
cally  treated  sewage then flowed  into the  LAMELLA
gravity  settler manufactured  by  the  Parkson  Cor-
poration.    This  unit  separates   the  biological
solids and other solids  from the sewage by  means  of
sedimentation  between  inclined  plates  within  the
unit.
                         661

-------
z
Hit
^
J
u.
u.





UJ
^



•-*
, w ®
~ *• ® z
0 > 5 ~
E « m 0>
_ . o
ai •• ,- ~
_l O "> O
1








•o
— **" "S
CO
UJ
^f«
• Vi»
i <
UJ

o
c
3 ® w
*•• •
^ = o
t. U. Z

I
»--








S >> L. c
— •; o —

 Z —
S 2 • I
_i a co o
i








to

<£
cc



•o
••«
—— ^^*- ™~
GO

. 1
>

J—
UJ
II
u.
UJ





1
o
w
*j

2

/



^
1 3>
O C

O *
CO
k
\
o
c ,_
M 0) v~
o tZ °
~ u. z

i—










w*^ -
——•^B*»^



f
^ »
TO>









T3
O
I
T
1
























A
T
h
UJ
iju
u.
in








•o

0
CO
j k


, L. |~
~ ** • —
~ -> Z *"
E 
-------
     The  second   means   of  biological   treatment
tes.ted  was  the  rotating biological  contactor  (or
bio-disc).    The  bio-disc  consists   of   circular
plastic sheets  revolving within a  hemi-cylindrical
tank, through the  sewage  flows.  The plastic  sheets
or  disks  rotate   through  the  sewage  growing  the
biological slime  for  treatment.   The disk  used  for
this  pilot  plant  was  11'-8"  long,  12'-10"   wide.
The  unit  was divided  into  five equal  stages  each
containing  8,190  ft2   of   media   surface.     The
circular  media  sheets  were  1'-9"  in diameter.   The
rotating  bio-disc unit  was manufactured  by  EPCO-
Horrnel Co.  During the  study various stages  -  two,
three,  four  and   five   -  RBC' s  were   utilized.

     The  effluent  from  the  rotating bio-disc  then
flowed  by gravity to the  microstrainer or LAMELLA
gravity settler.   The microstrainer  was  tested  to
see  if  the biological  solids produced  by  the rota-
ting  oio-disc could  be" removed or  not.  The  mirco-
strainer  has a  drum  covered  with a  fine mesh  having
an  opening  of  35  microns.   The  microstrainer  was
manufactured by ZORN.

     The  rotating  bio-disc,  microstrainer  and elec-
trical  controls were contained within  a 24"  by  16"
by  16'  wood  building to protect them from  the  ele-
ments .                     • -   -

      24  hour composite  samples were   analyzed  for
BOD5,  dissolved oxygen,  settlable  solids  and  sus-
pended  solids.  Temperature, and. pH  were taken  from
plant  records  and grab  samples.    Those  analyses
were  petforrned  in accordance  with  Standard Methods
(2).    -.'•',.
North Bergen Central  Sewage  Treatment  Plant

     The  Central  Sewage  Treatment  Plant-  in  North
Bergen,  New  Jersey  is  an  application  of  rotary
screens,  biological  contactors,  and  gravity  plate
settlers  as a  process for  treatment  of wastewater.
                           663

-------
     The treatment  plant  consists of the  following
major treatment units:   bar screens, lift  station,
self cleaning  fine  rotary  screen  for primary  grit
and  suspended  solids  reduction;  rotating  bio-disc
system  for  biological  treatment;   gravity  plate
settlers   for   separation   of   the   biomass   and
suspended  solids  from  the  rotating bio-disc  system
effluent;  post   aeration   to  increase   dissolved
oxygen   concentration   in    the    stream;     and
chlorination   system   for    the    final    effluent
disinfection.  This  whole process is shown in  Fig.
2.

     The plant  uses a  rotary self-cleaning  screen
in  place  of  the  conventional  grit  chamber   and
primary    clarifiers.         The     Hydrocyclonics
Corporation's  Model RSA-36120 with  0.02" opening
was  selected  for  design because  it  will   pass  more
flow  and   give  an  effluent with  almost   identical
levels of  suspended  solids.

     The rotating bio-disc  system  was  designed  to
lower  the  soluble  BOD to  10  mg/1.    A   hydraulic
application  rate  of  2.4 gpd/ft^.  is  expected  to
accomplish this,  using a two  stage   arrangement  to
assure  that  the  system be  kept  aerobic.   At   the
design flow rate, a minimum of 4.16  million  square
feet of  media  surface  area  is expected to provide
this degree  of  treatment.   This  amount of surface
area can be provided by using 32  units arranged  as
16 flow streams of  two stages in  which the area  of
the  first  stage  is  104,000 ft2 per  shaft and  the
area  of   the  second   stage   is   156,000   ft2   per
shaft.  Each shaft of  discs is installed  in a steel
tank  with  each  such  unit  serving  as  a  stage  of
treatment.   The  shafts will  be rotated at a speed
of 1.6 rpm.

     The   rotating   bio-disc   system  installed   in
the  North  Bergen  Central   Treatment  Plant  can  be
summarized as follows:
                          664

-------
                                         1-
                                         z
                                         Z
                                         111
                                         UJ
                                         cc
                                         H

                                         Ul
                                         CD
                                         UJ
                                         CO
                                         cc
                                         K
                                         Z
                                         UJ
                                         o

                                         z
                                         111
                                         cp
                                         QC
                                         Ul
                                         00
                                         CC
                                         O
                                         Z

                                         o

                                         t-
                                         <
                                         2
                                         ui
                                         i
                                         o
                                         CO

                                         CM
                                           *
                                         0>
665

-------
Type:Autotrol Model 601-251
 and 6b1-251 Total Number of Unit32 Surface
area/each Unit:
              1st Stage 104,000 sq ft. and
              2nd Stage 156,000 sq. ft.
Drive Speed:            1.b rpm
Diameter of Disc.       3.6 meter bio-surf HD shaft
Hydraulic loading:      rate 2.4 gpd/ft2
     The Claripak  gravity  plate settlers installed
in  the  North  Bergen Central  Treatment  plant  are
summarized as below:
Type
Total Number of Unit
Dimensions of
  FRP Sheets
Inclination
Projected Settling
 area/each Unit
Hydraulic Loading
Peabody Welles Series 3000A
7
24" wide x 120" long

55°

2,500 ft2 ea.
571 gpd/ft2
     The  gravity  plate  settler  is   suitable  for
final solids separation following either a rotating
bio-disc or trickling filter system which is demon-
strated by the pilot plant study  in this paper.

     The operation  of North Bergen  Central  Sewage
Treatment  Plant  was  described  according   to  the
parameters  of  6005,  suspended  solids,  volatile
suspended   solids,   ammonia   nitrogen,   dissolved
oxygen,    chlorine    residual,    fecal   coliform,
temperature,  and  pH  which  was :analyzed   in  the
treatment plant by plant personnel.
                          666

-------
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS '

Hoooken Pilot Plant Study

     The  pilot  plant  established  in  the  Hoboken
Treatment  plant   was   operated  in  a   full-scale
facility.  The  wastewater  flows to the pilot  plant
varied  between  13.7  and  56.8 gpm  over  the  test
period.    Sut  the  hydraulic  loading  rate  on  the
trickling  filters  or RBC were  controlled  at  desired
values  by pumping.    The  wastewater  temperatures
•ranged  from ." 1 1 ° to  26°C.    The pH levels  remained
fairly  constant  at 6.5 +0.5.
     The  BOD  concentration  of  the  wastewater  in
Hoboken,  New  Jersey  plant   varied  throughout  the
experimentation   period.      Figure   3  shows   the
influent BOD concentration  of. the  raw  wastewater on
the  in.dicatd months.   Most  of  the  raw wastewater
BOD  concentration  ranged  from 75 to 175 mg/1.   The
total  suspended  solids  (TSS) concentration of  the
raw  wastewater is  shown  in  Figure  4.   TSS  varied
from 14 mg/1 to 175  mg/1  averaging 58  mg/1  over the
test period.   But  most  of them  were  still  in  the
range  of 20  to 80  mg/1.

     The  performance  of  each  unit  in  the  pilot
plant  study  is described  below.
                          667

-------
      225-
      200-
      175-
      150-
      125-
       n-
     g50
     5
     e   i
     Z   I
     d

     0'
          DAH.Y EIO-DISC B.O.Q CONCENTRATION
                            influent
                                  effluent
            	^	^,	+.	^	^,	^-	


             AUG.     SEPT.     OCT.      NOV.      DEC.      APR.      JUL.
             19 77
                                                           1978
Fig. 3  INFLUENT  AND  EFFLUENT  BOD  CONCENTRATIONS


                       BIO-DISC  CONFIGURATION
                                   668

-------
      DAILY BIO-DISC T.S.S. CONCENTRATION
i



O "
I—
<
cc
>—

UJ


Z

O 20-
         AUG.

        1977
                  Jl
                           influent
                                          effluent
                        "•*•«
                 SEPT.     OCT.
NOV.      DEC.
                   APR.

                   1978
                                                                       V
                             JUL.
Fig.4 INFLUENT  AND  EFFLUENT  TSS CONCENTRATIONS


                        BIO-DISC  CONFIGURATION
                                     669

-------
Rotoscreen (Rotostrainer)

     The  openings  in  the  rotoscreen  were  0.02
inches  against  a  flow ranging  from  13.7  to 56.8
gpm.  All  solids  larger than  0.02  inches  were  re-
moved.  The influent suspended solids  concentration
ranged  from 12 to  162  mg/1,  averaging 75 mg/1 over
the  testing  period in  April,  1978.   The  effluent
readings  from  the rotoscreen  for  suspended  solids
ranged  from  5  to 149  mg/1,   averaging  65.6 mg/1.
The average percentage  removal for  suspended  solids
is 7.7%.   The  actual  levels  for  the  influent sus-
pended  solids  should  be  somewhat  higher  than  the
values  indicated   in  the  report.    This condition
stems from the fact  that  the  sampling devices used
to  record  the  data  were  not  capable  of accepting
gross vegetable  and  fecal matter  found  in  the  raw
sewage  influent  samples.   This  restriction  in  the
size  of particles  accepted  by  the  sampler would
produce lower  than actual results  in the  influent
but  would  have little  effect  on  the  effluent  re-
sults.   Actual suspended  solids  removal of  15   to
20%  have   been  documented  elsewhere  (3).    It   is
anticipated  that   the  actual   removals were   higher
than  the   pilot  plant  test  data  indicated.    The
North Bergen  treatment plant  design  was  based   on
20%  suspended  solids   removal  by  the  rotoscreen.
The  actual operations  of  rotoscreen  in the North
Bergen Central Sewage Treatment Plant  from October,
1981 to January 1982  are  shown in Table 9  in which
it  snows  average  suspended  solids  removal   was
28.9%.

     Compared to the primary settling  tank,  the  ro-
toscreen  can  remove  less  suspended  solids.   How-
ever,   it  does   not  significantly   affect   the
performance   of    trickling   filter   or  rotating
bio-disc.   The  BOD  load  applied  to  a trickling
filter  or rotating  bio-disc  does  not include  the
fraction which is  included in a settleable  solids.
Therefore,  the rotoscreen removes  less suspended
solids  than does a primary settling  tank, this will
not  signficantly  increase  the BOD  loading  to  the
                           670

-------
trickling filter or rotating bio-disc  process.   All
influent  settleable  BOD is not  required to be  re-
moved in  tne  primary treatment  unit  as long as  it
is not  solids  which  can plug  the  media and  inter-
fere with the  biological  activity.  The settleable
solids  which are  not  removed  by rotoscreen  will  be
settled in the secondary clarifier.
                                            used  in
                                                 was
                                                 re-
                                           in  Tables
Trickling Filter

     A plastic  media trickling  filter  was use<
this study.   The effluent  from the rotoscreen
fed to  the  trickling filter.   The  BOD  and SS  „_
movals by the  trickling  filter are  shown  in Tables
3 and 4.  The  trickling  filter effluent  sample  was
treated  to  simulate a  final  clarifier.   The  corn-
posit sample of  the  trickling  filter was  settled in
a one-liter graduated cylinder for  60 or  30 minutes
depending on BOD or  SS analyses,   It was  found  dur-
ing SS   testing  with  the  LAMELLA  gravity settler
that the 30 minute  settling  test  more closely  simu-
lated  the  LAMELLA  gravity  settler,  then  the  60
          • • - •         used   to  .simulate  the   final
                           minute settling  was  used
                           n-ir»nf-ciC!  aohf-linrT Fi"^y"  SOD
lated
minute  settling  was
clarifier.   Therefore/  30
for  SS  analyses,  and  60
analyses.
minutes  settling  for
     As  shown  in Table 1 ,  at the  hydraulic  loading
rate of  1.4 gpm/ft2  the  overall BOD  removals  were
more than  8b%.   It  can be  concluded that the trick-
ling  filter provides  excellent removals  under  the
application of  rotoscreen for  the primary  treat-
ment.  The various  BOD concentration  of  8.8,  10.0,
18.9,  and  16.2  mg/1  from  the  tower 2 shown in Table
1  exhibits the  lower  limit  with  biological  treat-
ment.   The pilot plant  test  result has  shown  that
the  biological  reaction in the  trickling  filter is
similar  to the  first order kenietic reaction.   This
implied  that  the rate of  SOD removal  will increase
as  the influent BOD concentration  increases.   This
phenomenon has  been  demonstrated on  wastewater at
specific hydraulic  loadings  for a  BOD5  concentra-
                          671

-------
lr*j  jj 'o
    o  *
 •o  w  s
 c  j-i  &-<
                                  'O 01
                                  C 4-1
                                  (0   -
                                                 Qj I
                                                 0? (
                                                •o :
:     0) S-)
i CN JJ <0
I' fO  C rH
                                                    0) O fXJ     >.i  O Jl' Q (0
                                                 D U-i T3 -C -H     C'  U T) .£ •*-»

                                                 3 vo AJ ->-i <2     6 vO aJ -^ 3J
                                                 " — fij 3 ^.     EH *- ,-B 3 e
1
.s
*U_I
U
ra
e
c
4J

"i
n
a*
jj
c
t-i
fc
(u
jj
2

IT
S

u
1

s
ud
U)
u
u
It
u
•».;
U



2
OJ
i!
£u

E*
"«-H

O
U
Ss
y
•H
iJ
8'
(-H
a.

°
1

9
^

1
s

™
I
u







.-(
2
o
S

i—

§
Q






i
g


^~
Vi

S
01
jj
•M
!t
V

•* f.
" «
H) W
JJ
g
m tu

m a
C 4J
•rf m m u
*D C1 iJ «
§ as. gl
d Sslg:
0 < r- S S.
'^ !
1 >
                                                                  O  

±1

                     672

-------
tions ranging from  80  to  600  mg/1  (4).  So the BOD
removals were  more than  85%  in the  Hoboken pilot
plant study  by using  the rotoscreen  as  a primary
treatment.

     Due to  river inflow and  infiltration,  a  high
chloride concentration, 50  to  770  mg/1 is found  in
the influent to tne Hoboken Treatment Plant.   How-
ever,  no  deleterious  effect  on  the  process  was
observed during the pilot test period.

     The effect of NaCl on  biological  film has  been
reported by  Lawton  (5).   He found  that a step in-
crease  in  salt  concentration  to 20,000 mg/1  had  a
deleterious  effects on  the  film  growth,  but  the
film growth  recovered  in  one day.

     As  shown in  Table 1,  the effluent BOD concen-
tration  from Tower  2  was lower  than  from Tower  1,
but with two towers,   the trickling  filter did not
significantly further  reduce the BOD  concentration.
This was because  some  of  influent  BOD  concentration
were  lower and the effluent  BOD  from Tower  1  had
reached  the  equilibrium  BOD.   Therefore,  the  BOD
removal  efficiency  was   improved   a  little   by
increasing   the   number   of  towers,   under  this,
wastewater  characteristics  and hydraulic loading
rate.  The provision of the additional  tower  to the
treatment  can  secure  the quality of  the effluent
BOD  concentration.    In   case  the   influent  BOD
concentration is  higher,  the  effluent of  the first
tower can  be treated by the second tower.

     The overall  suspended  solids  removals in  this
study ranged from 61   to  82%.  as shown in Table  2.
The  effluent suspended  solids  concentration  from
two-stage  trickling filter was  less  than  20  mg/1
after 30 minute settling.
                          673

-------
                           CUV
                                          04 OJ
                                      -U  CO 4-> "r-t

               — JJ  O    r- jj
                                          0)  JJ          ni . i
S  O  SI   -
                       674

-------
Rotating-Biolog ical -Contactor-;  ,  ,     -   -,

     In this  study,  another configuration was  made
by  using   a  rotating   biological   contactor   (RBC)
in  place  .of   the   trickling  filter   to   treat
wastewater  which  was   primarily   screened  by   a
rotoscreen.   The  treated  effluent from  the  RBC,
then,  was settled by LAMELLA^gravity settler.   RBCs
like trickling  filters  are a fixed-film  biological
treatment  process.    The  settleable  solids   which
passed through the rotoscreen  would hot  effect  the
RBC.  The  reasons  are  explained  in the  section  on
trickling filters.  The  incoming settleable solids,
which will not plug  the media,  may be removed  in  a
final clarifier  or  LAMELLA gravity settler.    The
low  BOD and  SS  effluent  concentration  shown  in
Tables  3,   4  and   5  implied   the   feasibility  of
flow-througn  system, by   using  a  , rotoscreen   for
primary  .treatment   and   an   RBC   for   secondary
treatment.  Therefore,  using  an RBC or a  trickling
filter in the flow-through  system .resulted  the  same
efficiency on both BOD  and  S3 removal.
     The  rotating bio-disc  (or  RBC)  was  arranged
for two-stage operation  at a hydraulic  loading  rate
2.5 gpd/r"t2  initially.   The  bio-disc was
during  two  periods.    One   was  from
12/8/77.   The  other was  from  ,4/6/78
The result of the two periods  are shown
                  operated
                8/12/77  to
               to 4/30/78.
                in Tables  3
and  4.   The  wastewater
period  ranged from' 1.2°
The  major  difference in
wastewater  temperature
temperatures  in  the  first
to 26°C  averaging  19.6°C.
the  second  period was  the
ranged  from  12°   to   15°C
averaging 14 C.  The  results  from  these  two  testing
periods  indicates  that  at  a  hydraulic  loading  of
2.5  gpd/ft2 with  a  rotation  rate of  1.6  rpm  the
two-stage  bio-disc would  obtain  84%  8005  removal
and  an  expected   6005  effluent  of   1-7.5   mg/1.
Suspended   solids   levels   in  the  effluent   are
expected to be  18 mg/1.
                           675

-------
                             TABLE 3
         BOD5 and Suspended Solids Removal by Rotating
          Biological Contactor during 8/12/77 to  12/8/79
Parameter

BOD5*
Suspended Solids*
0005 Removal
SS Removal
Effluent Range

4 co 48 mg/1
1 to 44 mg/1
61  to 100%
18 mg/1
16 mg/1
80%
60%
                              TABLS  4
         6005  and Suspended  Solids  Removal  by Rotating
           Biological  Contactors  During  4/6/78 to 4/30/78
 Parameter
 Suspended  Solids*
 8005  Removal
 SS  Removal
Effluent Range

6 to 23 mg/1
1 to 57 mg/1
75 to 95.7%
Average

15 mg/1
22 mg/1
87. 8%
66%
    After  60  minute  laboratory settling  for BOD analysis
    After  30  minute  laboratory settling  for SS  analysis
                               676

-------
 .C




* 3 M
      US\




        ,-i

        5



      •§ §
o s — '
So <#• CF\
iK — | CO
1
-.1
'— !

AJ

JJ r-1
^ £j
c -
•g as
U-l
§\ o
at AJ

^,
OT \
-S

5sg

O
in to
 n't
M < T-




- oo
VD i •
«— ft ^d1


• in
en  ' — ^?



|5 ^!

p o
T- GJ
m i- <: is ^


O 0
4J » r* , 4-)
r- TO > •-* r-
^D a*1.  - 4J
o gj aj




• m
o •





• CM



-r~
33 % •"
O> rf, CO

O CD en
co > rvj
   ;-;   s^


   1   &
   3 w SI  cr.
   - o w\  —
 > £1)
      sa
                            -co      05   co
            \. o \     \ ON-..
                                    cr»   co     
-------
     In stage analysis,  the  RBCs were arranged  for
a  two,  three,  four  and five  stage  operation  at
hydraulic  loading  rates  2.0 and  2.5  gpd/ft2.   The
RBCs were  rotating  at  1 .7 ' rpm  for  the  period  of
test.  At  two stage  operation,  the BOD removal  was
89% as shown  in Table 5.  As  the stages  increased
from 3  stages  to  5  stages,  the  BOD  removals  were
changed  from   38%  to  83%.     The   BOD   removal
efficiency  versus  stages  is  plotted  in  Figure  5.
Prom the results,  it  was found  the BOD removal  was
higher  at   two  stages  than  any  other   additional
stages.    The  performance  of  the  RBC  system  was
related to the  characteristics  of the wastewater,
as it left  the  rotoscreen.  The  higher influent  BOD
in two and three stages  might  result  in  higher  BOD
removal efficiency.   Although,  on  the average  the
five stages did not  remove  any farther BOD, .it  did
remove additional  ammonia nitrogen.   The  four stage
system on  the average lowered  the ammonia  nitrogen
concentration from 10.4  mg/1 to  5.2 mg/1,  which  is
a  50%  reduction.    An additional  1.8 mg/1  ammonia
nitrogen was removed  by  the fifth  stage  for a total
ammonia nitrogen   reduction  in  the five  stages  of
67.3%.     Apparently, BOD  reduction in  terms  of
soluble BOD was nearly complete  at  a  loading of  2.5
gpd/ft2.

     In  terms  of  net solids  production,  the  two
stage  system  loaded  at 2.5  gpd/ft2  gave  a  net
solids  production  of  -17  mg/1;  but  to  three  and
four stages gave -6 mg/1 and 7  mg/1  at  2.5  gpd/2,
to  five  stages gave 9  mg/1   at  2.0  gpd/ft2  as
shown  in  Table  5.   The net  solids  production  was
calculated  by  substracting  the  suspended  solids
concentration  in   the rotoscreen effluent  from  the
mixed-liquor  suspended  solids  concentration  in  the
RBC.    This  difference   represents  the   suspended
solids concentration  changes  through  the RBC.   The
sludge  production per  BOD  removals  for  various
stages are  shown in  the  last column of Table 5,  and
also plotted  in Figure  6.   Sludge  production  was
calculated  by  substracting  the  suspended  solids
concentration in the final clarifier  effluent  from
                          678

-------
 o
.2
 UI-
 oc
 Q
 O
    90
£  85
O
•2.
yj

g
u_
u.
yj
    8 0
    75
   70
      O
    2       3


STAGES OF RBC
        Fig.5 EFFECT OF  STAGES OF RBC ON


               BOD REMOVAL  EFFICIENCY
                       679

-------
 .Q
 «•».
 JQ
Q
LU

O
2
ill
cc

Q
O
CO
CO
    LOO
    0.75
   0.50
Q
111
O


§  Q£5
DC
Q.

LU
O
Q
                        JL
       0
                        2       3


                    STAGES OF RBC
  Fig.6 EFFECT OF STAGES OF RBC ON  SLUDGE

         PRODUCTION PER UNIT BOD  REMOVAL
                        680

-------
the mixed  liquor  suspended solids concentration  in
RBC.     Dividing  this  sludge  production   by   the
decrease in BOD concentration through  the  test  unit
yields  sludge  production  as  sludge  produced   per
unit BOD removed.   At  the same hydraulic  loading,
the smaller  number of' stages  produced  low  sludge
production per  BOD  removal.   This  is exactly  what
would be expected from considerations of  F/M where
F is food and M is biomass.  In the RBC  system,  the
F/M ratio  is  directly  to  the F/A ratio, where  A is
the area of active surface area in the  system.   The
more area in  the first  stage of the RBC  system,  the
lower is its  F/A  ratio and by comparison  with  F/M,
the  lower  should  be  the  net   sludge  production.
When the hydraulic  loading rate increased  from  2.5
gpd/ft2  to 5.0  gpd/ft2  in  a  two-stage  RBC,   the
net sludge production  per  BOD removal  would be  more
as expected F/M ratio  increase.  As shown  in Table
6,  at  the   two  stages   of  RBC  the   net  solids
production and sludge  production per  BOD removal at
5.0   gpd/ft2    are   larger   than   that   at   2.5
gpd/ft2.                             .

    .This  observation  of  the  performance  of   two
RBCs versus a larger  number  in  a staged RBC  system
gives one  the feeling  that future designs  would be
optimized  by  spreading the  surface  area  over  a
smaller number of stages.  For  carbonaceous organic
removal, this would  lead  to  a  lower  sludge produc-
tion, a more  stable biomass, and a  lower BOD in the
final  effluent caused not  by  better  soluble  BOD
removal,  but  more  by . the lower  BOD of   the  more
stable  biomass that  might escape  settling in  the
final  clarifier.    The  optimum  number  of  stages
would appear  to be  two stages,  for BOD  removal  and
for a given amount  of  tital  supplied  surface  area.
When comparing  with  single state system,  two  stage
would  reduce  the  impace   of  short  circuit,  toxic,
and shock  loading due  to low F/M.
                           681

-------
LAMELLA Gravity Settler

     The LAMELLA gravity settler was  used  for  final
clarification  in  the two  treatment  configurations
of  pilot  plant  study.    The  testing  results are
shown in Tables 7 and 8.

     The hydraulic variation imposed  on the LAMELLA
gravity settlers  included  loadings of 360, 720 and
1008 gpd/ft2  in the rotating  bio-disc  study.   The
results  are  shown   in  Table  7.    During  the 360
gpd/£t2   loading   priod   the  effluent   quality
averaged   14   rag/1;   the   corresponding   removal
averaged 30.5%.   This  removal efficiency  reflects
the excellent  floe  development in  the RBC  process.
However, the  360  gpd/ft2 loading  provided no  real
challenge   for   the   LAMELLA  gravity    settler.
Correspondingly,  the hydraulic  loading  rates  were
increased.    At  the 720  and  1008  gpd/ft2 loading
the effluent  S3 was  23 and  14  mg/1 respectively.
Even  the  effluent   SS  were   lower  than  30   mg/1,
however,  the  removal  efficiency   were  not   shown
as  good.   This  was due  to the lower  solids  flux
through  the  rotating   biodisc process  during the
study.

     In a  two-day investigation,  it  was   found the
effluent SS  was 12  mg/1 at  the  1530 gpd/ft2  load-
ing.  The results indicate  the LAMELLA gravity set-
tler can treat  rotating bio-disc effluent  at higher
surface  loading rate.   The   intent  of  this  quick
study  was  to  examine draraat ically higher  loadings
while  the  plant  was relatively stable.    Althouth
the  LAMELLA  gravity settler  displayed  good   sus-
pended  solids  removals at  the  1580  gpd/ft2  load
                          682

-------
ing,  this  test
full  scale design.
720 or 1008 gpd/ft
was  too  short to  be  utilized  for
     However,  higher  design loading
    are probable.
     The performance of LAMELLA  gravity  settler  foe
the effluent  of  the trickling filter process  which
was operated  in  the 1.4 gpm/ft2 is shown  in  Table-
8.-  The average  effluent suspended  solids  was  8  and
11 mg/1 while the  loading  rate on  the LAMELLA gra-
vity 'settler  was  360  and  1008  gpd/ft2 respetive-
ly.   These  results exhibited  that  even  when  the
loading  rate  was  up  to 1008  gpd/ft2 the  effluent
suspended  solids was 11 mg/1  and  removal  effiency
;was 75%,

     Therefore,  the  investigation  indicates  that
the LAMELLA  gravity settler  is  suitable  for  final
solids   separation  following  either   a   rotating
bio-disc or  trickling filter  system.    The  loading
rates on  the  LAMELLA gravity  settler can  be  up  to
1008  gpd/ft2.   The  investigation  also found  the
effect  of  biological Solids  on  the  intervals of  the
LAMELLA  gravity settler  was  minor.   Some growth
occurred on the  wetted  surfaces which only  appeard
as  a  film and  never affected  the  workings of  the
LAMELLA  gravity  settler.     The   LAMELLA  gravity
settler  was  cleaned twice  in  the  six  months   of.
pilot   operation   and   only   then   because   of
changeovers  in  operations.   Clogging problems  are
existant  in  waste treatment  application(2).   .But
the  application  of  LAMELLA  gravity   settler   on
rotating   bio-disc  and  trickling   filter  solids
exhibited  a  good  solids  separation.  The  effluent
solids  of  the  rotating   bib-disc  and  trickling
filter   are   unlike those   produced by  activated
sludge.   The  good  settling  characteristics of  the
solids  found  in  the rotating bio-disc or  trickling,
filter  effluent  is due  to  the low  mixed liquor
suspended   solids    concentration   and   result   in
discrete  settling  which greatly enhance the solids
settling  velocity.  Zone, hindered or  compression,
                          683

-------
                             Table 6
               The Effect of Hydraulic  Loading  Rate
                 on wet Solids Production  and BOD
                     Removal at Two-Stage  RBC
Period
                        HLR
          Temperature   (gpd/
                Net  Solids
                Production
                (mg/1)
               BOD
               Removal
      Sludye
      Production
      per  BOD
      Removal
      (Ib/lb)
7/19/78
 o
 /28/78
             24
5.0
                  21
               82.2
      0.81
4/b/78
to
4/30/78
             24
2.5
                  1 .7
               85.0
      0.50
                               Taoie 7
         The  Performance  of  Lamella Gravity Settler for the
                    Effluent of Bio-Disc Process
Overflow  Rate
   (gjjd/ft2)

      360
      720
    1008
Parameter

   BOD5
   SS

   BOD5
   SS

   30 D 5
Effluent (mg/1)

      14
       9
      28
      23

      21
      14
   Overall
Removal (%)

   80.5
   82.4

   75.0
   60.0

   «4. 5
   67.5
                                 684

-------
       and  is  a  function
        plate settler  the
       distributed.    The
        by outside  forces
         sudden  hydraulic
settling does not  occur  in the secondary clarifier
following  the  biological  contactor  system.   The
removal  of discrete  particles  is  independent  of
tank  depth and  detention  time
only  of  the overflow  rate.    In
flow  is  laminar  and  uniformly
suspended  solids are  not  upset
such  as  convection  currents  or
change.

Microstrainer

     A 35 micron microstrainer was directly  applied
to  the  effluent   from   the  two-stage  RBC  with
hydraulic  loading  rate of  2.5 gpm/ft^.   The test
results  of BOD  and SS  removal  of  two-stage RBC
system,  which   received   wastewater   from   a  roto
screen,  by microstrainer  and  simulated clarifier
are shown  in  Table 9.   The  simulated clarifier  is
mentioned  before when settling  RBC  effluent  in  a
one-liter  graduated  cylinder for 60 and 30  minutes
for BOD and S3 tests respectively.

     The   results   in  Table  9  indicate   that   a
microstrainer  achieved better SS  removal  than the
simulated  clarifier,  while  the effluent  8005 was
ony 6  mg/1.   However,"  after August 31, 1977 it was
found  that  the microscreen  failed  due  to  heavy
slime  growths.   Microorgamisms  grew  up quickly  on
the  screen's  surface   which  caused  clogging and
biofloc  in the  effluent.    The  use  of  chlorinated
water  for  cleaning gave only temporary improvement.
Those  operation  difficulties made it  impossible  to
apply  a  microstrainer  for the removal  of  SS from
RBC effluent.
685

-------
                                      Table 8
     The Performance of  Lamella  Gravity  Settler  for  the  Effluent
                       of the Trickling  Filter Process
Overflow Rate
  (ypd/ft2)

      360
     1008
       Parameter

           BOD 5
           SS

           BOD 5
           SS
         Effluent  (mg/1)

                12
                 8

                22
                11
                                           Overall
                                         Removal  (%)

                                             90
                                             81

                                           '  86
                                             75
                                        Table 9

                            BOD and SS Jteinovals of Two-Stage RtC System
                             by Micrcscriner and Simulated Clarit'iec
      Kiram&ter
No at
bampK-s

 12

 12
. fluent

(n.j/1)
                        IGo

                        44
               %MK)val                 se
, Microstrainer (rtg/1) 'Miccostrainer  Clarlfier '(rag/I)  Clarifier
                                                  81.9
                             11

                             10
                                                bO.6

                                                77.3
      IVSt
               From a/ 1-3/77 to 8/31/77
                                        686

-------
North Bergen Treatment Plant

     The  concept  of  design  for  the  North" Bergen
Central  Sewage  Treatment  Plant  was  based  on  the
results  of Hoboken  pilot  plant,  study  which  was
proven  to  be  a reliable  technology.    This  10  MGD
treatment plant was finished  in-1981.  According  to
the  operation  report  of  North  Bergen  Treatment
Plant/ the average  data  for  the first  4 months,
October, Nqvember, and December of 1981 and January
of  1982 are  summarized  in Tables  10, 11  and  12.
The  numbers shown on Tables  10,  11 and  12 are  the
averages  of data, based  on daily sampling.    Table
10 shows  the  flow rates  and characteristics of  raw
wastewater.   The  actual  average flow was  from 0.85
to 1.5  MGD  which  is  much  less than the design flow
rate  10 MGD.   This  is because -all  areas have  not
been hooked up the sewer  line yet. - Therefore, part
of  the facilities  at North  Bergen  Central Sludge'
Treatment Plant are  not in  operation.

     The  application of  rotoscreens,  in  the  North
Bergen  Central  Sewage  Treatment  Plant,  was  for
primary treatment.   The  results  of  the  operation
are  shown  in  Table  11.    The   suspended  solids
removals  were from  24.9  to  33.6%  averaging  28.9%
during   the   first  four   month  operation.     The
manufacturer's  information showed  about  15 to  20%
SS removal  when applying  rotoscreening to municipal
sewage.   Therefore,  20%  SS  removal  by  applying/
rotoscreens   for   preliminary  treatment  can   be
expected.   Two advantages  of rotoscreens are high
dry  weight   of  solids  produced  and  small  floor
requirements, associated  with  low  operation  and
capital  costs.    The maintenance  costs  are  also
lower  due to  fewer moving parts  when  compared with
primary clarifiers.

      Two-stage  rotating  biological contactors were
applied to remove BOD in the North  Bergen  Central
Sewage Treatment  Plant.   The  BOD  removal  efficiency
ranged from  H4.1  to  89.7%  averaging  86.8%  during
the  first four months.   Compared with the  data in
                           687

-------
                                                      00

                                                      CO
                                                       in

                                                       in
0)
    C
    (0
 03  r-(
 O  0<
•i-l
4J  | '
 U)  C
•H  CO
 t I  C
 0)  4->
4J  (0
 O  CO
 (0  M

 (0
.G  CO
U  0i

-O  I
 C  CU
      CN
                              O  g     «-
                              CQ -^
                                  EC
                               0)
                                               r--
                                               cn
                                               LD
o
m
                                               00
                                                      en
                                                      m
in
en
                                                             n
              ex
              o
                                                             in
m
oo
                                                       <=*

                                                       r-
Temper at u
(°C)







JC
4J
G
O
IS

• s
CO O
> 1-1

O
2;
^o
o^
^*
oo
•
0

CO
Q
g
cu
o
CO
Q
±
OO
o\
•
o

>1
J»4
(0
d
c
(0
1-3
                                                          688

-------
                                      0\P
                                   CO  >
                                       O

                                       cy
                                                    on
                                                    ro
                                                           CTi
                                                           CM
                                                              r-
                                                              Is
 0)
r-i
JD
 (0
EH
        O
       53  4->
           C
        CD  rt5
       &  r-H
        C  4->
       •H  C
           0)
        C  S
        0)  -U
        0)  <0
        y>  1;
        O  H
        03  &H
        O
       4J  D
        O  en
       Pi,  03
to
        (0  rtf
        >  S-l
        O  4J
        e  c
        iD  0)
       «  O
       CO
                         4J T-
                         c \
                          CO     CM
                             C  13  OO
                             O T-  C  ov
                                   0)

                                   "o
                                   4J
                                   o
                                       «-     o
 CU

 O
^
                                                            0)
CJ
fl>
Q
Jj
m
a
c
CO
Jen
 lea
 la;
  •>
                                          689

-------
    M  r-  r—
" S *   °
— "o—   o
                  r—  I  r_
                     !  ^
    690

-------
Hoboken pilot plant study, the average  influent BOD
concentration  was  109.1  mg/1 which  is  about the
same  influent  BOD  concentration  at   the  Hoboken
Pilot  Plant  study.    The"  average  effluent  BOD
concentration was  14.5 mg/1  which is  close to or  a
little lower  than  that in the  Hoboken  pilot  plant
study.  However, nitrification was  already ocurring
in the North  Bergen  treatment  plant.   In Table 12,
it shows the .averaging ammonia nitrogen removal was
57.1%.  The  average  ammonia nitrogen concentration
was reduced from 16.3 mg/1 to 6.9 mg/1.         . '•

     Suspended  solids  removal ranged  from 77.1 to
88.9%  averaging   82.5%.     The   average  effluent,
suspended  solids   concentration  of 18.7  mg/1  from
LAMELLA   gravity   clarifier   implied    that  the
settlability  of biological  slime sloughed from RBC
was   good.     After  four   months  operation  the
biological solids  did  not grow  on the  surfaces of
LAMELLA gravity  plate  which also  implied that the
characteristics of biological solids  from RBC was
suitable to the use  of  LAMELLA gravity settler for,
the final liquid solids separation.

     Some  advantages of  LAMELLA  gravity settlers
includes  low  space  requirements,  low   installed
costs, low  maintenance,  due to  fewer  moving  parts
to wear,  replace  and adjust,  and high efficiency.
In  a  well  designed  and properly sized  LAMELLA
gravity • settler,   the  flow  is  laminar,  therefore,
the  suspended  solids  are  not   upset  by  outside
forces  such   as   convention  currents   or   sudden
hydraulic change.                               '

     The successful  operations in the North  Bergen
Central Sewage Treatment  Plant duri.ng the last four
months implied that  the application of  flow-through
system to municipal  sewage  is  feasible. • The short
                           691

-------
detention time of  rotoscreening  in the system  pro-
vides the great  advantage  to the biological  treat-
ment system.   Usually, the"hydraulic detention  in
tne primary clarifier  is two hours.   But  the  deten-
tion  in  the  rotoscreen is  only  2   to  3 minutes.
Therefore, tne difference between  the influent  tem-
perature  and  the  effluent  temperature  is  not  too
much.  This is very  important  for biological  acti-
vity during the winter  time.  The  higher  water  tem-
perature makes the biological activity  in the  reac-
tor  higher.   The  comparison of  rotoscreen  versus
primary  settling  tank  and  LAMELLA gravity settler
versus secondary  settling   tank  to their detention
times and land requirements  are  listed  in Table  13.
The  detention  time in  the  entire system including
rotoscreen, RBC,  and  LAMELLA gravity settler  takes
less than an hour, compared  with  the  detention  time
of 6 hours in conventional  activated sludge.    This
compact  system  also provides  another benefit,  due
to  its   compactness,  the treatment   system  in  the
North Bergen  treatment  plant is  housed in a  build-
ing which protects the  rotoscreen, RBC,  and LAMELLA
gravity  settler equipment from extreme  temperature,
viariation, neavy rain  and high  wind.   The  con-
struction cost  of RBC  using shallow  tanks   (6  ft.
above ground) versus  activated  sludge tank with  15
foot depth  underground is  relatively lower  as  the
water in the activated  sludge tank exerts consider-
able pressure on  the soil,  thereby requiring  costly
pile foundation  and  dewatering,  especially,  if  the
soil conditions  on site  are bad.   Tne total  con-
struction cost of the  North  Bergen  Central  Sewage
Treatment Plant  in  1980  was 9.5  million dollars.
An equivalent secondary treatment plant would  have
cost at  least 22 million dollars,  (figures obtained
by  using  data  on  the  Constructions   Costs   for
Municipal  Wastewater  Treatment  Plants  (1978)   (6)
updated  to  1980  dollars).   The  low  operation  and
maintenance  costs, minimum land  requirements  and
reduced  capital  cost  inherent  in this  flow-through
system show  great  potential  in the  treatment  of
municipal    sewage,    in     the    near    future.
                          692

-------




















ro
'—
'CD
r-i
o
to
EH





















cn
4-J
G .
CD
e
CD T3
SJ C
•H fO
.3
CJ1 0)
CD Cn
D 4-1
T3 rH G
C CO "3 ,
rd rH
i r*1 rrj C\ j
CD
t3 4-) 4-J
G fCS G
•H e
cn 4-J 4->
CD O (0
•H ' SJ
EH rH EH
fO
C G G
O O CD
•H -.H cn
4-> 4-1 ^J
G C CD
. CD CD 00
4J >
OJ G ^
Q 0 4J
CJ M
4H O
o c z
CD
C CD
O S
CO 4-1
•H CD
M CO
rd
•a,
e
o
CJ
CN
HH
• —
no
c
4-J fd
C 1-3
m
i-H
•
4-> C
C "rH
0) S
5 • —
4->
03
CD EH
M *
EH Q
C
0)
cn
M
CD
PQ

jG CO
-1— 1 -I-*
Sn -H
O C

 EH
-H •
•P Q
O
rH
rd
C
O
-H
4-J
C
CD W
> 4->
C -H
O C
£
, o
4J

o
1-H
V( i — I
tO 4-> ^
S 4-J C
•H i SH
•H - rH 4-1 '4J
4-1 CJ ' E CCS 4-J
O P3 (0 J-l CD
oc; aj J o co



0 0
O O
Q 0
V - , -^
•sO -r>
CN ' r-'




• " ' . o
in
O
4J
o
VO O
ro CTs

rH •••
fl5 'TD SH
C CD CD
O 4-> - >i-H
•H tO CD V4 MH
4-i > cn rd -H
G ' -H T3 t3 Vi
CD 4-1 D C (0
> O i-H O rH
C 
-------
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

     The  Hoboken  pilot  plant  was  operated  on  a
full-scale   facility   by   using   rotoscreens  for
primary treatment.   Rotating biological contactors
or  trickling  filter for  carbonaceous  removal, and
LAMELLA gravity settler  for biological  solid and
liquid  separation.     The   results  showed   this
flowthrough system can successfully  treat  sewage  at
the   effluent  concentration   of   both   BOD  and
suspended  solids  less than  20  mg/1.   The  biomass
sloughed  from  the  media  of  rotating  biological
contactor or  trickling filter into the mixed  liquor
were  easily  settled  down  on the  LAMELLA  gravity
settler without causing any  problem  on the  settler,
such  as  biological  growth  on  the  plater  of the
settler.

     In stage analysis, the  operation of the  rotat-
ing  biological  contactor  at two stages  showd the
best results, either  in  the BOD removal efficiency
or sludge production, while comparing  with 3,  4  or
5 stages.

     Therefore, the  concept of  flow-through  system
and  two-stage  rotating   biological  contactor was
adopted in  the  design of  the North Bergen  Central
Sewage Treatment Plant.

     Prom  the  operation   data  at  the   first  four
months,  it   showed  the   flow-through  system was
successfully  applied  to  the North  Bergen  Central
sewage Treatment Plant.  The  rotoscreen removed the
suspended solids from 24.9  to 33.6%  averaging  28.9%
which  is  less  than that  of the  primary  settling
tank.   However,,  the  effluent  of   the  rotoscreen
would  not  effect the whole process.   The  average
BOD  and  SS  concentration   form  LAMELLA   gravity
settler runs  14.5  mg/1  and 18.9 mg/1 respectively.
Due  to the  short hydraulic detentioin  time of  2  to
3 minutes at  the rotoscreen  the temperature  between
influent   and   effluent    would   not   make   much
difference.   This short detention time provides a
                           694

-------
great  advantage  in biological  treatment,  in  which
the  biological activity  is  temperature  relative/.
during  the  winter  weather.   The ' low  construction
cost  of  11  million  dollars  versus   22  million
dollars  for  the  'equivalent   secondary  treatment
plant, low operation and maintenance  cost, low land
requirements   and   low  energy  cost   implied   the
flow-through   system   a   great  potential  to   the
treatment of  municipal sewage  in  the near future.
When   the   physical   conditions   are   limited   by
available land size, poor soil  conditions, and high
g^roundwater levels,  the  authors recommend that  you
should   consider    the    application    of    this
flow-through   system '  for    municipal   wastewater
treatment.          '
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     We  wish to  extend  special  thanks  to  Seamus
Cunningham,  Vice  President  of  Mayo,   Lynch   and
Associates.  His administrative assistance  has  been
instrumental in the  conduct of this  work.   We would
also like  to  thank Robert Androsiglio, Peter Lynch
and  Anna  Lynch,  Engineers  of  Mayo,   Lynch   and
Associates for  their technical and  laboratory  help
for the duration of  the  project.
                              695

-------
REFERENCE:

1.  Germain, J.E. "Economical Treatment of Domestic Waste by
    Plastic - Medium Trickling Filters "JWFGF Vol. 38, No. 2,
    February, 1966, PP. 192-203.

2.  "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
    Wastewater."  14th Ed., Amer. Pub. Health Assn., New York,
    N.Y., 1975.

3.  "Rotoscreen" oy Hycor Corporation, Bulletin No. 1101 1077,
    1977.

4.  Autotrol Corp., "Application of Rotating Disc Process to
    Municipal Wastewater Treatment, U.S. Environmental Protection
    Agency Water Pollution Control Research Series, Project No.
    17050 Dam, Nov. 1971 .                   ' "  '

5.  Lawton, G.W. and Eggert, C.V., "Effect of High Sodium Filter
    Slimes."  Sew.  and Ind. Wastes, 29, 1226 (1956).

6.  U.S. EPA Technical Report "Construction Costs for Municipal
    Wastewater Treatment Plants: 1973-1977" EPA 430/9-77-013,
    January, 1978.
                                 696

-------
          AN IN DEPTH COMPLIANCE  AND  PERFORMANCE
         ANALYSIS  OF  THE RBC  PROCESS  AT MUNICIPAL
       SEWAGE TREATMENT  PLANTS  IN THE UNITED  STATES
       Robert J.  Hynek.  Manager of Process Verification,
       Autotrol Corporation,  Milwaukee,  Wisconsin

       Richard A. Sullivan. Manager of Process Engineering,
       Autotrol Corporation,  Milwaukee,  Wisconsin
INTRODUCTION
A number of recent governmental reports, most notably the
Government Accounting Office (G.A.O.) report entitled, "Costly
Wastewater Treatment Plants Fail To Perform As Expected", have
severely criticized the performance efficiency of existing
wastewater treatment plants.  The plants evaluated by the
G.A.O. were reported to employ either activated sludge, trick-
ling filter or lagoon unit operations for biological waste-
water treatment.  Autotrol Corporation, as part of.a routine
customer service, regularly checks the  operational performance
efficiency of Rotating Biological Contactor  (RBC) plants where
it has supplied  equipment.  This paper  statistically compares
the performance  efficiency of those  treatment plants evalu-
ated by the G.A.O. with RBC plants supplied  by Autotrol Corpor
ation.  This report was originally written early  in 1981 and
further modified after evaluating an additional 22 P^nts
early in  1982.   It  should be noted that the  data  from  1980 and
1981 was  statistically similar  and 1981 data verified  original
conclusions presented in  the initial report.

In general, while the G.A.O. report  stated  that  "E.P.A statis-
 tical report  on plant performance show that  between.50 and  75/o
                               697

-------
of the treatment plants in operation are violating their per-
mits in any given time", Autotrol's study on performance of
existing RBC plants revealed that these RBC plants were meet-
ing their discharge requirements for BOD removal 89% of the
time and were meeting their discharge requirements for suspend
ed solids 92.5% of the time.  The data further suggests that^
long term process failures  (violations occurring more than six
months per year) is 500% more likely in alternative technology
evaluated by G.A.O. as compared to RBC plants evaluated by
Autotrol.

When discharge violations did exist in RBC facilities, the
vast majority of the violations were minor excursions from
standards.  Where major violations occurred, the prime cause
was equipment deficiency, not treatment reliability.
DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY
 In November of 1980,  the General Accounting Office reported
 back to  the Congress  the results of its, investigation into the
 operation of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) that were
 designed, built, and  funded under the authority of the grants
 program.  The report  stated that at any given time 50% to 75%
 of the plants are in  violation of their National Pollutant
 Discharge Elimination System  (NPDES) permits.  The report con-
 tinues that a random  sample of 242 plants in 10 states found
 87%  of the plants in  violation of their permits at least one
 month per year with 27% in "serious" violation.

 Autotrol Corporation  decided  to statistically analyze and com-
 pare the results of its RBC facilities to those analyzed by th
 G.A.O.   Important to  the confidence of the reader is the know!
 edge that all the data displayed and the only data we would us
 is that  gathered by the municipality and reported to its appro
 priate state agency.

 Although every attempt was made to make the comparison as simi
 lar  as possible, i.e.,

   Autotrol and G.A.O. evaluated plants classified by
   E.P.A. as capable  of providing secondary or better
   levels of treatment.

   Autotrol and the G.A.O. evaluated plants based on
   the  issued NPDES permit.
                               698

-------
Some differences that did exist are as follows:

  G.A.O. evaluated 242 plants from the universe of
  676 plants available for evaluation (36%).  Autotrol
  evaluated 46 plants out of a possible 160 plants  (29%).

  The G.A.O. plants were "randomly selected".  Autotrol
  plants are those for which sufficient data was avail-
  able  to make a meaningful analysis and comparison.

  The G.A.O. report selected plants of flow ranges between
  1.0 mgd to 50.0 mgd.  Autotrol plants had a flow range
  of between 0.2 to 8.0 mgd.    •;                    ,

  G.A.O. evaluated data for a one year period between
  1978-1979.  Autotrol evaluated annual .data for 1980
  and for 1981.                  --  '  -

  The G.A.O. report evaluated data for BOD5, TSS and
  fecal colifbrm.  Because of the limited, amount of
  data  on fecal coliform, Autotrol's  evaluations were
  based on  BOD5 and TSS only.

 RESULTS.
 The summary of  plants  evaluated,  the  violations  observed,  and
 the number of monthly  sample periods  are described in Table I
 for the 1980 data  base and in Table II  for  the 1981 data base.
 The following charts show the compilation of both 1980 and
 1981 data for all  monthly data reviewed and the resultant
 successful compliance ratio.

         PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF  RBC  PLANTS
                 SAMPLE PERIOD 1980-1981
                Number of       Number of-..
                 Monthly         Monthly
                 Samples        Violations
                —.        BOD5
                            % Successful
                             Operation
   All
   Plants
   Surveyed,.
598
66
                               88.96%
                          TSS
   All
   Plants
   Surveyed
598
                 45
                               92.47%
                                699

-------
The results indicate that regardless of load and flow condi-
tions, plant operation, or potential lab analysis error, the
RBC plants evaluated were meeting discharge requirements 89%
of the time for BOD removal and 92.5% of the time for TSS re-
moval.  This high degree of compliance is considered very good
particularly in light of the G.A.O. report statement,"E.P.A.'s
statistical reports on plant performance show that between 50
and 75 percent of the treatment plants in operation are viola-
ting  their permit at any given time".

In an attempt to directly correlate the G.A.O. report on the
number of plants with discharge violations with the Autotrol
report on RBC facilities, Tables III, IV and V were developed.
Table III reports the number of plants evaluated in various
regions by the G.A.O., the total number of plants in violation
and the number of these violations per year of operation.
Autotrol developed similar comparisons for the 1980 sample
period (Table IV) and  for the 1981 sample period (Table V).
In addition, because certain plants  (#3, 18, 33, 44,  45) had
data  for both 1980 and 1981, worst year data for duplicate
plants were used to develop a composite summary of RBC  facili-
ties. The composite RBC plant performance is shown  in  Table
VI.

The following conclusions can be drawn  from a comparison of
Tables III, IV, V and  VI:
   1.
    The plants evaluated by G.A.O.  demonstrated  that  49.2%
    of the plants violated discharge permits  for more
    than 6 months out of the year.  Less  than  11% of
    Autotrol RBC plants had these extended violations of
    more than 6 months per year.   (Table III  versus Table
    VI) •

2.  While 25.6% of the plants evaluated  by G.A.O failed
    to achieve successful operation for  more  than 3 months
    per year, only 4% of the RBC plants  surveyed performed
    this poorly.  (Table III versus VI).

3   While in excess of 87% of the G.A.O. plants experienced
    at least minor violations, only 37% of the RBC plants
    experienced similar difficulties.  That is, 63% of^all
    RBC plants continually met discharge limits month in
    and month out.   (Table III versus VI).
                              700

-------
 4.  While only  34.7% of  the G.A.O. plants  surveyed performed
     satisfactorily  for more than  9 months  per year,  the
     RBC data  showed that 82.6%  of the plants performed
     satisfactorily  for periods  in excess of 9 months per
     year.       .      .         " -                      ,

 5.  The data  developed for RBC  plants were conducted over
     a 2-year  period.  The comparison between 1980  and 1981
     data basis  was  statistically  similar and repetitive.

 6.  The chances of  having no  violation  in  any year is 4
      times  greater using  RBC plants  evaluated by Autotrol
     as compared to  employing  those  plants  evaluated  by
     G.A.O.

  7   The  chances of  long  term  process failure  (i.e. greater
      than 6 months)  is  5  times as  likely in those plants
      evaluated by G.A.O.  as  compared to  Autotrol RBC facil-
      ities.

DISCUSSION OF VIOLATIONS OF REG FACILITIES
(COMPOSITE 1980-1981 DATA

Of the forty-six (46) RBC plants evaluated,  seventeen  (17)
plants experienced violation of wastewater NPDES permits.
Twelve  (12) can be classified as non-serious violations wnile
five (5) can be termed serious violations.  The definition
of serious violation is as defined in the G.A.O. report,  when
one or more of the three  parameters was violated for  more than
four (4) consecutive months during the review period  and aver-
aged more than 50% above  the permit limit during the  period
of non-compliance".  The  definition of serious violation is
similar in Autotrol's evaluation with the exception being that
fecal  coliform data  was insufficient  as  a parameter to be
evaluated.   The  following discussions will  classify the extent
of non-serious and serious violations encountered during our
survey.

   NON-SERIOUS  VIOLATIONS

   Of  the twelve  (12) plants  experiencing non-serious  vio-
   lations,  nine  (9)  of  those facilities  had yearly  average
   discharge BOD5 and TSS  values lower than  their monthly
   permit allowance.   (In general,  the yearly average BOD5
   discharge .value was 75% of the monthly discharge require-
   ment) .   Of those plants that exceeded  the discharge re-
   quirement on a yearly average basis,  a highest yearly
                               701

-------
 average value  of  37  ppm 6005  and  a highest yearly average
 TSS value  of 32 ppm  was recorded.  In  general,  a review of
 those plants experiencing  non-serious  violations indicate
 that violations are  minor,  of very short  term,  and  appear
 to have been corrected in  the most recent operations.

 SERIOUS VIOLATIONS

 Five  (5) plants in our survey experienced serious viola-
 tion  (10.9%).  This  compares  to the  G.A.O. survey where
 sixty-six  (66) plants  (27.3%) had serious violations.  Two
 (2) of the five  (5)  RBC plants experienced mechanical  prob-
 lems which resulted  in poor performance.  One  of the five
 facilities experienced industrial waste  loads  with  inadequate
 pretreatment which resulted in inferior  performance.   It is
 not known  whether the mechanical  problems were caused  by
 design or  equipment  deficiencies.  The following chart
 describes  the  plant, reason for non-compliance, average
 effluent BOD5  values and  average  effluent yearly TSS yearly
 values for the survey year.
  Plant

  #11 WI
  #24 OH
  #41 IA
  #34 WA
  #22 WI
                            Avg,Yearly  Avg.Yearly
     Manor Category         Eff. BOD5   Eff.   TSS

Industrial Waste Overload     61 ppm      40 ppm
Equipment Deficiency          15 ppm       3 ppm
Equipment Deficiency          41 ppm      42 ppm
O&M Deficiency                42 ppm      19 ppm
O&M Deficiency                 8 ppm      26 ppm
It should be noted that even though these plants experienced
serious violations, two of the five facilities still provided
effluent quality classified as better then secondary treatment
by the E.P.A.

CONCLUSIONS

The above comparative analysis indicates that RBC facilities
performed significantly better than facilities evaluated by
the G.A.O. Conformance was better in terms of both non-serious
and serious violation categories.
                                 702

-------



Plant
No.
3
4
5
6
8
10
11
13
16
17
18
19
21
23
24
26
27
28
30
31
32
33
38
39
41
44
45
46
48
TOTALS

MONTHLY


Mo
State No.
PA
OH
IN
MI
IA
MN
WI
WI
KY
MI
CO
OR
MI
CO
OH
MI
WI
NY
WI
WI
KY
WI
WI
KS
IA
NE
OR
WA
WA

Compliance Ratio
TABLE I
NPDES VIOLATIONS
TBODC
_/
. Violation Per ,
of Mo. Surveyed
1/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
1/12
12/12
0/11
0/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
7/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
1/12
0/11
3/12
2/12
0/12
8/12
1/12
1/12
0/10
0/11
37/343
89.2%

DURING 1980
TSS

Mo. Violation Per
No. of Mo. Surveyed
0/12
0/12
'0/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
12/12
0/11
0/12
0/12
1/12
0/12
0/12
1/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
0/11
0/12
2/12
0/12
9/12
2/12
0/12
0/10
0/11
27/343
92.1%
703

-------



Plant
No.
3
5
9
12
14
16
17
18
21
22
25
26
33
34
35
36
40
44
45
46
47
50
TOTALS

MONTHLY

Mo.
State No.
PA
IN
WI
WA
IL
KY
MI
CO
MI
WI
MI
MI
WI
WA
SD
IL
MI
NE
OR
WA
OR
WA
•
Compliance Ratio
TABLE II
NPDES VIOLATIONS
TBOD
Violation Per
of Mo. Surveyed
1/11
0/12
6/11
0/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
1/12
0/12
0/12
0/11
0/12
2/12
11/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
4/10
0/12
0/12
0/10
4/10
29/255
88.7%

DURING 1981
TSS
Mo. Violation Per
No. of Mo. Surveyed
0/11
0/12
0/11
0/12
3/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
7/12
0/11
0/12
1/12
1/12
0/12
0/12
0/12
3/10
1/12
0/12
0/10
2/10
18/255
92.9%
704

-------







d
o
•H
4-1
cd
>
r^
o
•H


d
CO -H
!3
o co
H 0)
EH -H
jj -H
O rH
M -H
> 0
 CO I — - .

1

• k • •
C3 LO 
o> r^ ^cf i — 1 co
CM


PM
H •
o- • -
PM CD M
W rH 0)
Pi CM ,0
6 e
" Ctf 0
o co ia


O CM O CM O
o 
-------
1







B
O
•rl
4-1
cd
rH
CO O

0 >
M

<3 *rl
h4
O CO
M 0)
> -H
4_)
PH -H

33 -rl
H 0
K cd
O F*i
H
P> i-3
M PU

W O
•J pa
S
H nJ





CO
,0
4-1
C
O
S

m
o

j_i
CU
Q
B
3










CN
! — |
1
o
1-1

in 
o m H
vD
1
H G
O O rH O  -H
4-1
>H -rl
1-4 rH
o o -a- tn -H
CO
1
rH
EH CJ
CTi rH rH rH |Z! Cd
CO CO  p ]
-3-
W O

rH -* OT Pi
EH . ^





CO

4-J
G
O
S

MH
O

^
0)
o
B
3










CN
rH
1
O
rH

^Q LO *>^
. * * *
i— i - CTi i — |
CTi
1

• * *
rH <
f£) [V|
CO CO
O rH
oo ?-.
OH M
rH Cd
g
g
3
CO

4J
!H G
O o
P4 -H
QJ 60
Pi CD
Pi
i — 1
O
f-l
4-J
O
4-1
^J
<£j
0) OO >,
r> CT» J-l
•H rH Cd
4—1 S
cd g
CO rH 3
B^S 3 CO
P 6
(1) 3 4J
CO > CJ }H G
CO -H O O
O 4-10) p, iH
M cd CO 0) M
O rH M Pi 0)
 rH
CO 3 G 0
3 6-S CJ M t-i
0 4-1
•H 0
rl 4J
cd 3
J>  CJ
CO -H
O 4-10)
!H cd CO
O rH SH
< 30)
s >
CO 3 B
3 &-S CJ H
O
•H
^
cd

"
706

-------































H
£>

w
1-1
PQ
in













































X— N
rH
00
O>
rH

c£J

O
00
o**
rH

1

S_|
w
§
CO

£5
H

CO
E-i
<1
p-l
O
pq


pn,
o

H
CO
0
O
O


























C
O
•H
4J
cd
i-H
O
•H
£>

Pi
•H

CO
cu
•H
4J
-H
1 — 1
•H
CJ
cd
PT,













cn
4-1
S
o
^r|

m
o

r(
cu
to
6

j2j









CN
i-H
O
rH

on o co
^ ^ ^ ^
CO

m r^ oo
CT*
1

• * *
CO ^> CNJ O
CO i— 1





j/^l
LO i — 1 <1" \&
\o
1

• * * .
CO ^-D VQ 1^*- CM
CN rH 00
v_x




**O vD O
CO
I
i—l
• • •
o^ o^ o~* r^-
i-H rH CO



4-1
cn ^d
cd 4-)
a) pi
J£
4-J
•>
cd
e
3
CO

4-1
M C
O 0

cu M
pi cu
Pi
rH
O

4-1
O
4-1
3
a)
•rl
1 1
cd '
CO rH
B^ 3 -
t= s
0) 3
cn > cj
cn -H
O 4-1 CU
M cd cn
a rH M
< 3 cu
e >
CO 3 fl
3 fr-S O M
O
•H
$-!
cd
707

-------
         THE USE OF PLASTIC MEDIA TRICKLING FILTERS
                     TWO CASE HISTORIES
     Felix F. Sampayo, Jones & Henry Engineers, Limited
     Toledo, Ohio
INTRODUCTION
     Over the last ten years, Jones & Henry Engineers has
investigated the use of fixed film biological processes at
a number of locations in the Great Lakes area.
Approximately half of these studies have been directed
toward the treatment of high strength waste and half
toward the production of nitrified effluents.  In some
cases, the investigations have included rotating
biological contactors and trickling filters.
                            708

-------
     This paper discusses  two  case  histories  on the  use  of
plastic media trickling filters.  One  of  the  case
histories deals with the treatment  of  high  strength  wastes
at Kalamazoo, Michigan and the other with nitrification  of
the Lima, Ohio secondary effluent.
THE KALAMAZOO CASE HISTORY
     The City of Kalamazoo, Michigan conditions  sludge by
wet air oxidation.^  The conditioned sludge is thickened
in decant tanks, dewatered by vacuum filters, and
incinerated.  The residue ash is landfilled.  The decant
tank supernatant and the vacuum filter filtrate  are
recycled to the head of the plant.  Although the recycle
streams represent less than 1 percent of the plant flow,
they constitute 24 percent of the total organic  load.
     An alternative to direct recycling is treating the
supernatant separately.  Jones & Henry Engineers tested
several processes for possible separate treatment of the
wet air oxidation recycle streams as part of the design
for advanced wastewater treatment.  The practicality of
various separate treatment processes was ascertained
through desk top, bench scale, and pilot studies.  Process
effectiveness was judged on BOD reductions.  Process
viability was determined using additional paramaters
including color removal, odor control, process
reliability, operational simplicity, space requirements,
and economics.  Bench scale studies of activated sludge
and physical-chemical methods showed these processes to be
ineffective.  Pilot plant investigations demonstrated that
attached growth reactors would best be used for
pretreatment of the recycle streams.  Design information
was developed during the tests that substantiated and
expanded previous research.
                            709

-------
CHARACTERISTICS OP RECYCLE STREAMS
     The supernatant and filtrate have essentially the
same physical and chemical properties.  The coffee-colored
liquors have an average temperature of 120°F  (49°C), a
noticeable odor, and strong frothing tendencies.
     Standard chemical analysis of wet air oxidation
by-product samples showed the liquor is acidic and
extremely rich in nitrogen, with substantial amounts of
chloride and sulfate and low levels of phosphorus and
suspended solids.  The waste has high BOD, COD, and TOC.
Specific chemical characteristics are detailed in Table I.
THE STUDY

     A plastic media trickling filter was pilot tested on
the supernatant of the wet air oxidation decant tank.  The
unit was operated for nearly six months  (December 17, 1974
to June 2, 1975).  The temperature and oxygen demand of
the supernatant were controlled by dilution with ground
water.  This was necessary as the temperature of the
recycle stream was too high for biological treatment.
     The test parameters for the pilot program were total
and soluble BOD and COD, and total and volatile suspended
solids.  Color and odor were noted but not measured.  The
parameters were monitored on the influent and effluent to
determine process efficiency at various organic and
hydraulic loadings, and dilution ratios.  Samples were
collected seven days per week; one sample every two
hours.  Analyses were performed on daily composites of
grab samples.
     Figure 1 is a diagram of the pilot facility.  The
supernatant was diluted with ground water at the top of
the tower.  This mixture flowed through a funnel to a
rotary distributor that controlled the hydraulic loading
to the filter.  The effluent was collected in the
recycling reservoir at the bottom of the filter, and a
portion of it was returned to a tank at the top of the
tower.  The constant level feed and recycle tanks were
equipped with outlets to ensure constant discharge.  The
feed, recycle rates, and dilution ratio were varied to
study the filter's efficiency under different conditions.
                          710

-------
       H
       fa

       O
       o
       o
                              co
                                    o     in
                                    o   ,  oo
                                    oo     r~
                                                        10-
                                                                      VO
                                                                      vo
                    o
                    00
oo
0>J
                                                                                   VD
      o
      M
                        u

                      'JS
 m

P4


4J
 W
H
                                                                                ~~* M — CJ  ^^
       1-1
       O
                              in
                                    o
                                    o
                          o
                          oo
                          in

                          H
r-
m
vo
in
in
                       4J
                       CO
                                                                         CO
                                                                            M
                                                        TO
                                                               Q     M  3
                                                           -^ M  ^ J  C
                                                           y  *  u O -H
                                              JL> p  coQ oo  TO co
                                            -O  EH  O M o
                                                     O .4 H-C
          in EH  5  S o)   ^ 78  b
                    M    tHOTOQts>a—EH^-'TO'-'TO^'EH^—9^-'S~-'
                                       711

-------
                       oo
                             CM
            (-1
            0)
   •o
H Q)
a
                       CM
                       i-H
                       in
                                  oo
            10
                 §
                 §
           !3  CO

           §  &

3    $    HT
g    3    O m

EH    o    j 

 - ^-%    "SO Q
H iH  - O W O
	 w
                 Q CM Q O  g


                 CM .-I « rM  rtj i-H
                 W
                    cn
                          O>
                                Oil
                                     m
                                     i1
                             en — m —
                                     712

-------
                           Heat Treated
                              Liquor
                                           J
                                   Feed  Tank
                                Dilution
                                Water
                                               Raw  Waste  Recycle
                                                 Pump      Pump














p-
5
o
t
CD
0

CD
O
0
0>
tr


















t
±
nip »













"A
^N















f^


o

cu

o
CD
t/>
CO
§

^
O3
oc
Effluent ^













r ^-
t •'.
Sampling Point
L
                                                                       Plastic  Media  "
                                                                       Trickling Filter
                                                         FIGURE 1

                                                DIAGRAM OF PILOT  FACILITY
_
                                                               713

-------
     The pilot equipment included:
     Pilot Tower Steel shell - 3 feet in diameter
                             - 30 feet high
     Media                   - 21.5 feet high Surfpac
                                 Media
       Surface area          - 7.07 sf
       Volume                - 153 cf
     2 - 0.5 HP pumps for influent and recycle
     1 - 1.5 HP pump for dilution
RESULTS
     The filter removed less than 60 percent of the BOD
under all test conditions (Table II).  The highest removal
of soluble BOD was 59 percent, achieved with low organic
and hydraulic loadings (85 lbs/1,000 cf/day and 407
gpd/sf) with a recycle ratio of 2.5.  BOD removals in
excess of 45 percent were attained at the same hydraulic
load, but with higher organic loadings  (282 and 469
lbs/1,000 cf/day) and a recycle ratio of 5.25.  In
general, BOD removal percentages were reduced as the load
increased.
     The highest BOD removals per unit volume of media
occurred at low levels of dilution with recycle ratios in
excess of 5.0.  The low dilution levels had a higher
temperature which improved treatment efficiency and
minimized freezing problems; however, high recycle ratios
lowered the temperature.  Therefore, if the process were
to be used, it would be necessary to achieve a balance
between recycling and dilution.
     The performance of the pilot plant was characterized
by a mathematical expression similar to one proposed by
the National Research Council.4  The expression may be
used to predict the effectiveness of the unit under a wide
range of operating conditions or applied to full-scale
systems with varied loads and recycle rates.  The formula
was not verified for high levels of treatment as removals
of BOD in excess of 60 percent were not attained.
                              714

-------
                   ra
                  rH
                   (0
               §  §
   o  m
\ o T3
M O V.

H rH  O
                                  oo in co  tx r~ oo in
                                  OOrHrHOOOr-rH
                                  inm'*ooincr»c>joj
                                                     rH CN
         I
         EH
                      4J

                      §§
                      dg
                      t-l
JJ

0> Q H
D O \
H ffl  O
OH 03  ~~
                                                     CP>  00
S §5    g     Q-H\O(0      	


 8"e    M     WOrH-«IH        rHrHCNrHCNCM1*
   3    fa        J    rH  O

         a

         H    .        -<  & o       i   !••••••
         H         •   fl)  EH              ininin^vor*




Ul    -
US    Q        r-l  V
rj!s    g         O.H           ovocooooinin

                    OflJ     \     	
         O         0)  pj     K     ca rH oj o csi c

                          P  '-P     S rH S i-H ^               3

                                                                O
                                                                X

                                                               «
                          0)  W
                       _4J\    OrHrHCNOppp
                       r^  id  n3     ^j* vo vo ^*
                       fe  («  ftl            rH
                                     715

-------
     The performance of the unit at 20°C may be
described as follows:
     E
      SBOD
-0.249 + 0.0423  ^W/FB
     where
        ESBOD

        W

        V

        F

        R
   =  fractional efficiency of soluble
      BOD removal
   =  soluble BOD loading to filter
      (Ibs/day)
   =  volume of filter media (acre-ft)
                              1 + R
   = recirculation factor =
   =  recirculation ratio
(l+R/10)
     BOD removals during the investigation showed that the
process could be used as a roughing device prior to
recycling.  The major difficulty encountered during this
study was the control of foam and odor.  Extensive
facilities for foam and odor control would be required to
develop a viable process.
DISCUSSION
     Treatment of wet air oxidation recycle streams using
plastic media trickling filters was not deemed to be
viable at Kalamazoo.  The requirements for dilution water,
foam control, and odor control would have resulted in a
rather complex treatment scheme with a high potential for
creating nuisance conditions.  The need to lower the
temperature would require either well water or high
volumes of primary effluent.  The use of clean well water
would have increased substantially the flow through
subsequent treatment processes.  The use of the warm
primary effluent would increase pumping requirements to
the towers.
     The process selected for Kalamazoo was to continue to
return the wet air oxidation decant and filtrate directly
back to the wet stream treatment train.
                             716

-------
CONCLUSIONS

The following conclusions may be derived from the study.

1.  Plastic media filters can be used to remove a
    substantial portion of the soluble BOD in wet air
    oxidation recycle streams.
2.  The process could be used for pretreatment of wastes
    before they are returned to the wet stream treatment
    process.
3.  The effluent from the process has high BOD and color
    and is not suitable for direct discharge.
4.  The use of plastic media trickling filters would
    require a significant investment in temperature, foam,
    and odor control facilities.
5.  Treatment of waste oxidation recycle streams using
    plastic media filters was found to be undesirable due
    to the high potential for odor, extreme foaming
    characteristics, and added complexity to the overall
   , waste treatment scheme.
THE LIMA CASE HISTORY
    The second case history  deals  with  the  use  of  plastic
media trickling filters  for  nitrification at the City of
Lima, Ohio Wastewater Treatment Plant.   The pilot  studies
leading to the design of these facilities have  been
reported  elsewhere^*3.   iphe  description of  the  plant and
early operating experience also have  been reported
previously4.  This paper summarizes the plant design
criteria  and  discusses operating experience for the five
years the complete plant has been  in  operation.
 THE  PLANT
     The  improvements  to the  wet stream facilities were
 essentially completed in the fall of 1976.   Upgrading of
 the  sludge  treatment/disposal facilities was completed in
 mid-1979.
                            717

-------
     The plant is designed for an average dry weather flow
 of  18.5 mgd and a peak of 53 mgd.   The original design
 concept called for the secondary and advanced treatment
 portions of the plant to operate at a peak rate of 33 mgd
 with the remaining flow receiving primary settling and
 chlorination.
     The upgraded plant includes screening, grit removal,
 primary settling,  aeration,  final  settling,  nitrification
 towers,  chlorination,  and phosphorus removal.   Ferric
 chloride and anionic  polymer are used for phosphorus
 removal.  Sludge treatment and disposal includes gravity
 thickening,  anaerobic digestion,  vacuum filtration,  sludge
 cake storage,  and  land spreading,.   Normal sludge
 treatment/disposal uses  thickening,  digestion,  and land
 spreading of liquid sludge.   Vacuum filtration  and sludge
 storage  followed by landfilling is  used as backup to land
 spreading.   The  design also  includes a centralized
 computer control system.   The plant discharges  to the
Auglaize River.
     The  design of  the  two  106  ft., diameter nitrification
 towers was based on the  results of  pilot studies.  The
media for the full-scale facility was  supplied  by
Goodrich.  The basis of  design, description of  the
individual treatment units,  and projected  plant effluent
are shown in Table  III.
                          718

-------
TABLE III
y OF LIMA, OHIO ••..-.
LTER TREATMENT PLANT
A AND DESCRIPTION OF PLANT .;

OH EH
W M
< &
13 0
rn
(H
CO
H
Q













cy Facilities: 33 mgd
53 mgd
Capacity and/or
ze Operating Conditions
(0 -H
•H W
4J «
VI -P
0) C
EH Ot
13 -B
•a
g1
o
ro
in
%%
-H -H
^ v
in vo
rH rH
C (0
•o 10 at
U.
in (0 >i
• "O vi
oo C n>
rH 0 S
0 -H
0) vi
•• ca ft
O _£ .C
rH en o>
O O ' " C^l
>1 VI VI *"
rH X! X!
•H H EH a
0 B o £
 a> at ro
•6
e
0
vo
rH
O
x -a
o S
OJ
rH
o; •
ro
rH (>)





^~*
Ci

ca
c
•H
ca -
(0 ^
ffl CN

S CN
01
•P rH
•H
a
co ca co
•O "O "O
p. p. p.
Cn en Cn
o o o
o o in
^^ ^1 VD
•^ •*
H rH
"O "O "O
i^i"
o o in
ro ro oo
in ro rH
co
vo
O)
•»
CN
-
^•^

ca
G
EH
O^
C 'I i 'i ii *i-i
•H ca ca ca
Z» o ro o
4J 0 0 0
at 10 oo o>
ca «. «. «.
^i
a ^
g CN CN H
•rH
VI
*O 'O
(^ ^^
in o
oo ro
H ro
to ca
VI VI
rH O
rH
B
IH
O
o
in
0)
o
ro








^^
i°-
ca
1
EH
C
O
•H
4J
(0
VI
J!
T3
at
•H
1
(0
§
XJ
rH
VI
•rH
0
o
VO
H
' O
0
ro
ON
ro







^•>
2- S
CO O
vi CQ
a>
S o
O o
rH rH
m -
0
O
-H 
-------
u
J
O '-P
\ -rH
•§"§
m o

t>i
4-> &>
••H C
m'-P
Pi (0

CJ OJ
o
<4H MH
ra ra
•O 13
CF* D^

«tf in


•O T3
CTI Ol
o in
CO 00
CO rH
ra
UH M
ra EH
S ra
pi JQ
CO CO
r- i-H
0 0

Cg; OJ

•a TJ
01 Dl
g g
in in
CO 00
rH rH
<4H
to
n EH
e ra
&X!
O^ rH
0 CM
CO CO
rH O

<2» <3f

T3 'O
tJi CJ*
e g
0 O
CO CO
CO CO
inutes contact
e
<*
CM


PM
rH
i1
in
CM







rH
s
CM

o
o>
f
rH
ra
•H
M
a

MH
ra
\
ra
X)
't
rH
CM
0)
If
3 rH
H m
ra
m m
0 -O
•g§
Q) U
r; d)
o ra

*W 'II
CO CQ
'^s^ 'v.
W CO
j3 ^Q
H H
^* CT^
CM ro

§
-H
4J
O
,|,J
V
"O
to
m
•o
rH
CM
rH
m
c>
4J

UH
O
o
o
o
CO
o
i-H
TABLE III
(Continued)
1
ra
••*
rH
X
a) m
N -rH
•H -O
Oi
o>
«
in
rH
CM
m
•rH
•O
CO
     in


rH
JS
o
4J

14-1
O

o

fc
1^.
CO



A
O
m
o>

X!

CT>
0
rH
CM



A
U
m


A
a

0
rH
CM
rQ
fi.
rH


X

•
m
•rH
•o
w
in

t3
§
CM
CM

X

•
n}
•rH
•O
m
in
00
•O
>
ra
CM
CM

^

•
m
•H
•o
^
in
00
T3
S
ra
CM
CO

X

•
m
•H
•O
«.
O
r»
             CM
                           CM
                           u
                                                                   CM

-P
•H
c
P





U
1
•H
53
4J
0>


r- )

jj
•H

tion Towers
m
u
-rH
IW
-rH

[ 1
•rH

Contact Tan!

(U
c
•H
H
o
rH

O
s Removal
3
1-1
O

Oj
ra
O

Fu
ra -N
& 2.
§ c7
oi
rH CO 6
m rH J>|
o o H
•rH Q) O
g fe CM
0)
ja
0
ickeners (2
X!
EH

0)
tJ>
•0
3
rH
U)
Digesters
0
•rH
XI
o

o>
m
c

rH
??
^i m
H *O
m c
s o
•rH O
I-i 0)
CM tA



ra
1
EH
C
•H
•O
H
O
Hi

0)

•o1
3
rH
W
                            720

-------
 M!
 O 4J
\ -i-l
;|O *O

 * o
   o

4J cn
•H G
 O -H
 (0 -P
 Q< (0
 (0 M
JS
B
o
CO
O

O
o
o
                                    0)
                 1
                 CO
                            II
         10
         •H
         •o
                 CO


                 X
        •H
        •o
                 in
                           •o -o
                            I   I
                           o o
                           ro ro
                      •O
                               cn  cn
                               B  S —
                         Cn
                         e

                      in  in
                       •   •
                      00  CO
                      rH  rH
                         (!)
                         Cn

                         (0
                         M


                         §

                         (0
                                       ki  (0
                                       C O
                                 e; — ~--
         ro
         CO
         fa
         O
         .
-------
THE NPDES PERMIT
    The plant operates under a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit issued on
January 21, 1981 that expires on January 20, 1985.  The
Permit establishes limitations for three different flow
conditions.  The pertinent limits of the Permit may be
summarized as follows:
               At 18.5 mgd
                          At 33.0 mgd
                               At 53.0 mgd
              30 Day  7 Day   30 Day  7 day   30 Day  7 Day
Parameter
Suspended
          Avg.     Avg.
Solids
BOD=
  (mg/1)
(mg/1)
14
20
13
20
14
                       Avg.
30
19
                               Avg.
30
20
         1,000    2,000    1,000   2,000
Fecal
Coli-*
form/
100 ml

NH3-N
(Summer)

NH3-N
(Winter)

P  (mg/1)

*Summer
 Only
     The Permit also requires that the D.O. of the
effluent be not less than 5 mg/1.
     The winter NE^-N limitation in the Permit is more
restrictive than the plant was designed for.
                   1.5
                              722

-------
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS,
OPERATION PROBLEMS, AND CORRECTIVE MEASURES
     The nitrification facilities were put on line in late
summer of 1976.  Operation was interrupted shortly
afterwards to repair damage to the plastic media in one of
the towers.  Damage resulted from mechanical failure of
one of the distributor arms.
The facility began nitrifying in about eight weeks and was
producing the expected effluent values by early November.
The time required for the start of nitrification was about
the same as in the pilot studies.
     Operation of the nitrification facilities has been
remarkably free of problems.  Early on, the towers
operated at almost 100 percent recirculation with no
attempts to optimize recirculation rates.  For the last
couple of years, recirculation has been set at about 11
mgd with the rate varying inversely to flow.
     The operational simplicity of the system is greatly
appreciated by the plant personnel.  The operator simply
reviews the computer printouts in the morning and makes
any necessary adjustments.  The plant personnel claim that
operation of the towers and recirculation system "take
about a minute a day".
     The towers sloughed off solids late in the summer of
1979 for a period of approximately two hours.  No decrease
in process efficiency was reported following slough-off.
No noticeable sloughing of solids has occurred since.
     The towers have experienced no significant operating
problems during about 5.5 years of operation other than
icing two or three times during the winters of 1977 and
1978, two of the coldest winters on record for the area.
During these occurrences, ice built up along the filter
walls and stopped the distributor arms.  The operators
broke the ice and the towers were put back into operation.
     At the beginning of the winter of 1979, operating
personnel capped the end nozzle in each of the distributor
arms, eliminating ice formation from splashes on the
walls.  No icing problems have been experienced since then.
     In late October 1981, the bearings in the
distributing mechanism in one of the towers failed.
                              723

-------
RESULTS
     The results for BOD, suspended solids, ammonia, and
dissolved oxygen during the first three full years of
treatment facilities operation have been reported
previously and are summarized in Table IV.  The results
for 1980 and 1981 are presented in Tables V and VI.  Raw
wastewater and air temperatures for the same period are
shown in Table VII.
     The tables show that the quality of the effluent is
consistent and generally better than required by the NPDES
Permit.  The one instance of high NH3-N in February 1980
has been attributed to analytical error.  At the time the
plant was experimenting with different analytical
methods.  The high suspended solids during January,
February, March, and April of 1980 were due to the plant's
inability to dispose of sludge with the consequent high
sludge inventory in the aeration system.
     The flows shown in Table V are total flows to the
plant and include a small portion of the flow that
received primary treatment only during January, February,
March, and April of 1980.  The actual average flow through
secondary treatment and nitrification for these months are:
     January
     February
     March
     April
13.14 mgd
10.64 mgd
22.98 mgd
18.80 mgd
     Beginning with May of 1980, the computer program
governing storage in the sewage system began operating
properly.  Storage in the system has reduced peak flows to
the plant and practically eliminated the need to bypass
partially treated wastes.
     From 1979 through early 1981, plant personnel took
approximately four measurements per month of TK-N in the
nitrification towers influent and effluent.  The average
for these values is shown in Table VIII.  Also shown in
the table are the loading to the tower  (Ibs TK-N/sf/day)
and the resulting effluent NH3~N concentration for the
years 1979, 1980, and part of 1981.
                              724

-------
                            s
                                           en
                                            •

                                           en
                         ro
                          •

                         i-l
                         C  !3  rH
      O
      M


      g
               en
               r^
               en
               rH

               r~
               r»-
               en
               8
               H
               tl
               03
               M
 3
H

 m s
                        rH

                        fa
                                    en    in
                  o
                  ro
                                    in
                                    en
~ tJ Q|   oo    in


i1^
                              Q
                                    5
                                    m
                                    rH
                                          oo
                  o
                  vo
                                          00
                                                 rH

                                                 in
                     AO

                     rH
               in    «>

               01    r~-
               o    in
               rH    rH
                                                10
                                                00
                                                o
                                                  • ,
                                                vo
                               VI
                               0}

                               0)
                                    en
                  00

                  en
                     en
                     r-
                     cn
                                     725

-------
          o
          CO
                 4J    -^
                 C J3 r-1
                 0) T \
                 3  ro O>

                 
                 CC    :
                 U CO '  .
                 -i Q  —
                 0) O  Oi
                 > «  e
                 ril     **•*
                                  tncovowvocnovovocococv)
                                  r-l  r-( CT> ' O CN  CM CO
                                  i-liH        rH     rH  •   H i-t  rrl H
                 o>
                     o> >J
                    •H  (01
                    w  Q|
                                  oooooivoncot^oinroroo
                                  caconocancqvooorHirii-i

                                  rHoooincoinvorHcrioocTico
                        S
                        i
                                   «   •   •  •     Q)  ^  • 4-J   •   •  •
                                  c.QMM>ie.-ioo
                                    726

-------
                              Q  g     i-HrHi-ii-Hi-ir-Hi-Hr-li-Hi-Hi-Hi-l

                           C 3  H     CT»co«4'-if)ir)r»ifN)csr>jvoinro
                           DCOOIOOOOOOOOOOOO
                           MH J3  »-•
                           rH     H     •*'*«*inmo,ror-ooo\r-co
                 £j        -H     g     OOOOOOOOOOOO
                 g       .fe     —
                 d.     -   «    •      •   •
                           S1
                 S        ss
                 g        s
          EH     M
          !Z     K
          SI               H
       O  to     O           §
       H         ftf           prt
       }^rj  P^     p^           *^
H •     •• s     o
H     H  H     S        jj
g .    ^  g     |;  !  '   « p,  rt

-------
                   TABLE VII
              CITY OF LIMA, OHIO

          WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
RAW WASTEWATER AND AIR TEMPERATURE  (1980-1981)
       Avg. Raw Wastewater
           Temp.  (°F)
January 1980
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
January 1981
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
47
45
42
49
58
64
70
73
71
63
54
52
48
48
50
56
59
66
72
74
66
60
56
50.9
    Air Temp. (°P)
Avg. Max.    Avg. Min.
31
31
44
60
75
79
86
85
79
63
46
33
31
43
48
64
64
78
80
77
68
57
45
30.5
21
17
29
39
51
58
67
68
58
41
32
23
17
24
30
44
48
59
64
58
54
40
33
21.9
                       728

-------
                                     en
                                                -P
                                                  H
                                                  \
                                                             HrOi-HOHi-HHOOOrHp
                                     oo
                                     o
                                     CO
                  sf
                  If
                        a
                        §
                             O ft
                             M
                             SI
H  fa
t-3  «

Em

°  w
H  rf
H  3:
O  Kl
*O y£5
W I  KM
o «  m
**;0

vi to >w
0) XI  W
£ H '
OHi-IOrHOOOOOOO

oooooooooooo
                                               ,
                                                c
                                            •8 SB
                                              S H
                                              O M-i  !S
                                             EH C  I
                                                M  M
                                       in
                                          CM
                                                             a  a s: r-t
                                                             D  VI O -H    

0) (U !i 3 -P O 0) <1> cn a-u > o 3 0) U O 0) «C CO O 53 Q 729 _


-------
                                                   H
                                                                   OinPOOi-Hi-HrHOOOOO
                                                                                                                        o en
                                                                                                                         «  •
                                                                                                                        r-l O
                                                      H

                                                       01

                                                    SB
                                                                                                                        in 10
                                                                                                                         •  •

                                                                                                                        CM CO
                                      w •""•    'ri
                                      a?
5  i
o s*s
i4 E-i TO

M W  . -
a xi  w
                                         o     o
                                         ^**    r i
OOr-IOOOOOOOOO


OOOOC3OOOOOOO
                                                                                                                        rf oo
                                                                                                                        o o
                                                                                                                                     4-4
                                                    a  o>
                                                                   coir>oi«ijj
                                                                                                                        CM CNJ
                                                                                                                         •  •

                                                                                                                        CT> H
                                                                                                                                     m
                                                                                                                                     u>
                                                                                                                                     10
                                                                                                                                     M
                                                                                                                                     0)
                                                                                                                                     IM
                                                                                                                                     i
                                                             OO
       o -H

       .<3 Q)
                                                                                    0)
                                                                                           to
                                                                                           0> &
                                                                                              js
                                                 0)



                                                 4J
                                                                                                     0)  (U
                                                                                                                 00
                                                                                                                        M n)
                                                                                                                        (0 3
                                                                                                     >  O
                                                                                    3  3  3  0) O  O  (1)
§
                                                                                     •d
                                                                                     -p
                                                                                                                           0)
                                                                                    730

-------
SLUDGE PRODUCTION
     The nitrification towers are not followed by  settling
tanks, therefore no sludge is collected.  The pilot
studies leading to the design showed a sludge collection
system would not be required.  The findings of the pilot
studies have been largely confirmed during operation.  The
towers have sloughed off solids noticably only once for a
period of about two hours during about five and one-half
years of operation.
IMPACT ON RIVER WATER QUALITY
     Table IX shows the BOD and D.O. concentrations
measured upstream and downstream from the plant in 1980
and 1981.  Downstream measurements are taken approximately
400 yards below the plant discharge.  It is evident from
the table that the plant effluent has essentially no
impact on the Auglaize River water quality.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COST
     Operation and maintenance costs averaged $142.55 per
million gallons in 1978, $138.93 per million gallons in
1979, $178.50 in 1980, and $244.82 in 1981.  Itemized
operation and maintenance costs for the last two years are
shown in Table X.
     The plant operator reports that practically no
manpower is required to operate the nitrification towers
and appurtenant pumping-station.  For all practical
purposes power and maintenance are the only operating
expenses associated with the towers.
                             731

-------
    H
EH  Pi
               O  el    r-HHr-IHr-lr-(rHr-)rH
                                                                    i-li-(H. HHH
            0)
    ,-,      M
    H      C
    00      5
     I       O
    O     Q
    CO
               Q

               8
               Q   SI     rH  r-l rH
                                                             i-Hr-lHi-Hr-HrHi-Hr-)
            0)
            U
            (0
                           o
                           00
                           en
3 X!
i-l  O
                                               fl)
    w  a) ja  e
 >1 3 4J  Q  g

*33(UOO
h)    >i

e "B  a

-------
   a  e
             CO CO ON
             o CM en  o co co
             rH rH     rH i-H i-H
0)
CQ
Q
    inrH
    Q
                 CN in  co in «>

                 in ^i*  in in in
                                      

                                      I
 &
  O
D a a) u o 
fe
J-.
4J
»

cr>
C
•H
•H

0)


CO
0)
rH
a.

CQ


                                 733

-------
                           TABLE X

                      CITY OF LIMA,  OHIO
                  WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

        OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COST (1980 AND 1981)

 Item                          1980                  1981
 Payroll
 Power
 Chlorine
 Chemicals**
 Miscellaneous
$460,590.42
 196,546.12*
   5,208.38
 102,870.05
 162,265.17

$927,480.14
$  510,036.08
   191,114.18
     3,771.59
   179,192.08
   172,260.34

$1,056,374.20
*  The  cost for power  averaged  0.022/KWH.
** Ferric chloride  and polymer.
DISCUSSION
   Figures 2 and 3 show  the data derived  from  the pilot
studies and the operating  results for 1979, 1980, and part
of 1981; the only years  that  the plant has collected data
regularly on the TK-N concentration  in the activated
sludge effluent.  The results predicted by the pilot
studies have been confirmed under actual  operation.  This
strongly supports the concept of designing nitrification
towers on the basis of TK-N loads.
   The nitrification efficiency of the total system meets
design expectations.  For  part of the year, the secondary
plant nitrifies well, as evidenced by the low  TK-N in the
secondary effluent.  During that time, the towers function
as polishing facilities.   The towers always oxidize
substantial amounts of TK-N.  The additional TK-N
oxidation in the towers results in a very stable effluent
with very low TK-N values.  For the twelve-month period of
March 80 through February  81, the TK-N in the  effluent
averaged only 2.65 mg/1.   The organic Nitrogen in the
effluent averaged 1.47 mg/1.
                           734

-------
                                                                  DC
                                                                  01
                                                                  5
                                                                  ro
                                                                     D
                                                                     CO
                                                                  O
                                                                  1
                                                                  Q
o
(O
       CJ
       in
(l/Bua)
                  JBMOJ. u| |\|-£HN
                           735

-------
   O  —
  =  3
  CL  U.
  0<
          00
          at
          o
          CO
          o>
          Q
                                                   O)
                                                   C
                                                 CO

                                                 111
                                                 oc
                                                 D
cc
LLI


N
Z  Q

=?£
 col-
X  Z
2
C)

CO
   q
   CO
q
in
                            o     o      o     o      o
(I/Bui)
                             49MOj_  U| |\i-£|-|l\l
                                 736

-------
     The  tower  effluent  is  always  better  than  the
influent.  Even though substantial nitrification occurs  in
secondary treatment, the  towers  are  needed  to  consistently
meet NH3-N effluent requirements.
     The  towers are not generally  loaded  to their  design
capacity.  Plots of TK-N  applied (Ibs/sf/day)  vs.  TK-N
oxidized  (Ibs/sf/day) show  a  straight  line  relationship
indicating that loadings  have not  been the  limiting  factor
in TK-N oxidation.
     During the summer months, the NH3~N  concentration
in the plant effluent is  about the same as  for loadings
ranging from 0.01 to 0.15 Ibs TK-N/sf/day.   During the
winter months,  and over the same loading  range, the
effluent NH3-N  concentration  increases substantially as
the TK-N  load increases.
     The plant  has produced the  desired results while
treating  the highly .variable  wastewaters  generated by a
partially combined sewerage system.  In any single month,
the flow can range from one third  to almost three  times
the design average.  The monthly average  for BOD in  the
raw sewage has  ranged from  53 mg/1 to  246 mg/1.  The
monthly average for suspended solids in the raw sewage has
ranged from 83  mg/1 to 210 mg/1.   It is unlikely that
single or two-stage activated sludge systems could provide
as reliable a treatment level under such  adverse
conditions.
     Stable performance is achieved with  a  minimum of
operational adjustment to the nitrification facility.
During 1981, the operators simply  kept the  recycle flow  at
11 mgd.
CONCLUSIONS
     The following conclusions may be derived from the
first five years of operation of the activated
sludge/nitrification tower process used at Lima:

1.  Nitrification towers following activated sludge
    consistently produce a high quality effluent with low
    BOD, suspended solids, TK-N, and NH3-N, and very
    high dissolved oxygen concentration.
                            737

-------
2.   The treatment process is extremely reliable and able
     to withstand shocks.
3.   The plant effluent is normally saturated or super
     saturated with oxygen.  The combination of high D.O.
     and BOD results in an effluent that exerts little or
     no oxygen demand on the receiving stream.
4.   The towers are easy to operate.
5.   The performance of the full-scale facility has
     confirmed the design criteria derived from pilot
     studies.  Very low ammonia concentrations can be
     obtained even during the cold winters experienced in
     midwestern United States.
6.   Final settling following the towers has not been
     necessary as the effluent contains very low suspended
     solids.
                             738

-------
                         REFERENCES
1 Sampayo, Felix F., Hollopeter, Dail C., "Treatment of
Wet Air Oxidation Recycle Streams", Proceedings 7th Annual
WWEMA Industrial Pollution Conference, June 1979.

2 Sampayo, Felix F., "Nitrification Studies at Lima,
Ohio", 47th Annual Meeting of the Ohio Water Pollution
Control Conference, Columbus, Ohio, June 1973 (Conference
Reprint).

3 Sampayo, Felix F., "The Use of Nitrification Towers at
Lima, Ohio", Second Annual Conference, Water Management
Association of Ohio, Columbus, Ohio, November 1973
(Conference Reprint).

4 Sampayo, Felix F.,  "Nitrification at Lima, Ohio",
Proceedings International Seminar on Control of Nutrients
in Wastewater Effluents, September 1980.
                             739

-------
        PART VII:   NITRIFICATION AND DENITRIFICATION
        NITRIFICATION OF A MUNICIPAL TRICKLING FILTER
        EFFLUENT USING ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTORS
     Frederic C. Blanc.  Professor, Department of Civil
     Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Mass.


     James C. O'Shaughnessy.  Associate Professor, Depart-
     ment of Civil Engineering, Northeastern University,
     Boston, Massachusetts.

     Charles H. Miller.  President, Haley and Ward, Inc.,
     Waltham, Massachusetts

     John E. O'Connell.  Project Manager, Haley and Ward,Inc
     Waltham, Massachusetts.


INTRODUCTION

     This paper presents the results of a pilot plant inves-
tigation and design for achieving seasonal nitrification  of
a secondary trickling filter effluent.  The municipal treat-
ment plant in Milford, Massachusetts discharges into the
headwaters of the Charles River, a Class B stream.  Conse-
quently, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has required a
nitrified effluent, phosphorus removal, and effluent filtra-
tion.  Table 1 lists the present and proposed discharge
limitations formulated by the U.S.E.P.A. and the Massachu-
setts Division of Water Pollution Control.
                               740

-------
           Table 1.  Present Discharge Limitations
  Effluent Characteristic
  Monthly
  Average
  Maximum
    Day
Flow  (MGD)
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
  5-day 20° C
Total suspended solids
Settleable .Solids
Fecal Coliform Bacteria
Total Coliform Bacteria
PH
   4.0

  30 mg/1
  30 mg/1

 200/100 ml
1000/100 ml
  50 mg/1
  50 mg/1
  0.3 ml/1
 400/100 ml
2000/100 ml
Shall remain between 6.0 and 9.0
                Proposed Discharge Limitations
Effluent Characteristic
  Monthly
  Average
  Maximum
    Day
Flow
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
  5-day 20° C
Total suspended solids
Settleable Solids
Total Ammonia Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Dissolved Oxygen
Fecal Coliform Bacteria
PH
   4.3

  7 mg/1         11 mg/1
  7 mg/1         11 mg/1
  0.1 ml/1       0.3 ml/1
  1.0.mg/1       1.5 mg/1
  1.0 mg/1       1.5 mg/1
           Not less than 6 mg/1
  200/100 ml     400/100 ml
  Shall remain between 6.0 and 9.0
     After preliminary evaluation of alternate methods of
achieving nitrification, rotating biological contactors were
selected.  A pilot plant study was conducted during the late
summer and fall of 1977 to determine both the performance of
such a system in nitrifying a trickling filter effluent and
the design and operating parameters.  Specifically the ob-
jectives of the pilot plant operation were to determine
various design and operational parameters of the RBC process
                            741

-------
with regard to nitrification, including loading rates,
removal rates, removal efficiencies, solids production, and
solids settling characteristics.

Existing Wastewater Treatment Plant
     The existing sewage treatment plant consists of primary
sedimentation, raw sludge dewatering, secondary treatment by
high rate trickling filters with a varying degree of recir-
culation, final clarification, and chlorination of the efflu-
ent before discharge to the Charles River.  Flow enters the
plant through two pipe lilies, each equipped with a Parshall
flume and its attendent flow recording equipment.  One line
receives the discharge from the Charles Street pumping sta-
tion through .variable speed pumping equipment, and that dis-
charge is therefore responsive to inflow variations.  The
other line is the main gravity flow outfall from that portion
of the -collection system not draining to the Charles Street
pumping station, and is equipped with a comminutor in addi-
tion to the flow meter.
     Grit removal is accomplished in the primary settling
tanks along with scum and settled sludge removal.  The com-
bined grit and raw sludge are then dewatered by vacuum fil-
tration, \\fith the aid of lime and ferric chloride as sludge
conditioners.  Dried sludge, with a pH of 11 to 12, is dis-
posed of as land fill in the discontinued sand filter beds.
The effluent from the primary settling tanks flows through a
flow control chamber to 3 trickling filter rotary distribu-
tors which uniformly disperse the wastewater onto stone
media filters.
     Trickling filter effluent is pumped to the final clari-
fier and a proportionate amount of this effluent is.recircu-
lated to the trickling filter inflow, in order to provide
the hydraulic quantity necessary for proper operation of the
filter distributors during periods of low flow.  Effluent
from the final clarifier is subsequently chlorinated in a
chlorine contact chamber before discharge.
     The wastewater flow at Milford is predominately domestic
in character, and presently contains very little so-called
"industrial" wastewater.  Analyses of the raw wastewater
reinforce this conviction.  It is anticipated that this
situation will not substantially change in the future. Fur-
thermore, any future industrial wastes, which might affect
proper treatment plant operation will be required to receive
adequate pretreatment at the point of origin prior to their
acceptance by the municipal treatment facility.	
                              742

-------
     Plant records evaluated over the past five years in-
dicate the average daily flow to the treatment facility is
2.4 M.G.D. and the average influent BOD-5 is 140 mg/1.
Effluent BOD-5 averages 25 mg/1., which corresponds to a
BOD-5 removal rate on the order of 82%.  The facility serves
a population of approximately 22,500.

Pilot Plant Description

     During the late summer and fall of 1977 a pilot plant
was operated: on the Milford Wastewater Treatment Plant site.
Figure' 1, illustrates the flow scheme used for this pilot
plant operation.
     As shown in Figure 1, the clarified trickling filter
effluent 'was pumped from the effluent trough of the clarifier
to the two RBC units by individual submersible pumps.  The
rate of flow to each RBC unit was controlled by a valve
following each pump.
     The RBC unit consisted of a semi-cylindrical tank 4.23
feet long and 4.0 feet in diameter which was divided into
four equal-volume compartments by means of 1/4-inch steel
partitions.  Twelve 47-inch diameter rotating polystyrene
discs per compartment were mounted on a center drive shaft
so that approximately 29% of the .disc surface area was sub-
merged in the tank contents.  Each unit contained a total of
1570 square feet of surface area and a net tank volume of
120 gallons with the discs in the tank.
     Connections between the compartments or stages permittee
four-stage series operation.  These connections were made by
means of external pipes which by-passed the compartment par-
titions on the outside of the tank.  The wastewater therefore
flowed through the unit perpendicular to the center shaft.
     Alkalinity additions were, made by means of peristaltic
pumps from two 55-gallon tanks to the first stage of each
RBC unit.  The chemical solution was kept mixed by means of
a submersible pump in the bottom of the tank.
     The effluent from the RBC unit then flowed by gravity
to a settling tank, where solids were permitted to settle
out and' the overflow was discharged to the control chamber
adjacent to the existing secondary clarifier.

Pilot Plant Operation
     After a two week startup period in the beginning of
August 1977, the pilot plant acquired a reasonably full
growth of biomass.  From that time until December 1977
                             743

-------
1-
5
o
m
o:
*
I
»
I
N
i
w
I
t
                                         UJ
                                       UJ
                                      <
S  g
i  i
                                      o
                                      'O
                                      u.
                                      cc
o
      UJ
     744

-------
performance data was measured.            .
     It has been stated in the literature concerning nitri-
fication that any biological process for the conversion of
ammonia to nitrate will require a source of alkalinity in
the amount of 7.14 mg/1 of CaCO  for each 1.0 mg/1 of
NH -N oxidized.  (I, 2, 3).  The RBC process is no exception
and since the influent to the RBC's contained an average of
only 51 mg/1 as GaCO-, an external source of alkalinity was
necessary to insure complete nitrification of the ammonia
present.
     Alkalinity was supplied to the units in the form of
either bicarbonate of soda, soda ash or lime.  Efforts were
made during the pilot plant study to maintain a pH of 7.0
to 8.5 ^nd an alkalinity of greater than 200 mg/1.
     Sampling was arranged so that observations could be -
made under various conditions and at different times during
the day.  A 24-hour sampler was utilized a number of times
to monitor the characteristics of the influent to the RBC
units during the course of a day.  In addition, the regular
sampling procedure for monitoring the performance of the
units was arranged to provide data of both morning and after
noon operation, because the lowest influent concentrations
of NH--N were .observed between 5 A.M. and 10 A.M. and the
highest between 3 P.M. and midnight.

Operational Results

     Table 2 illustrates the typical unchlorinated trickling
filter effluent for summer operation which served'as the
influent to the RBC pilot plant.

          Table 2.  Typical Unchlorinated Trickling
                       Filter Effluent
      Parameter
Typical Value
TKN, mg/1

NH3-N, mg/1

NO  -N, mg/1
  •D
     , mg/1
Suspended Solids, mg/1
Volatile Suspended Solids, mg/1
    10

     6

     9

    25

    47

    38
                             745

-------
          Parameter
pH  *
Alkalinity (as CaCO ) , mg/1
                           Typical Value

                            6.0 to 7.0
                               51
* Values are before adjustment by chemical addition for
pilot plant operation.
     Due to variations in the strength of the raw wastewater
entering the plant there was variability in the trickling
filter effluent quality.  Table 3 depicts the variation in
ammonia nitrogen concentration with time for three twenty-
four hour periods.

       Table, 3.  RBC Influent Concentration Variation
                    Over a 24 hour Period
Aug. 11-12
Time   ' NH  mg/1
                   Aug. 14-15
                   Time    NH  mg/1
                             o
                               Aug.  16-17
                               Time     NH,  mg/1
11:30 AM
12:30 PM
  30
  30
3:30
  30
  30
6:30
7:30
8:30
9:30
10:30
11:30 PM
12:30 AM
  30
  30
  30
4:30
5:30
6:30
7:30
8:30
9:30
 8.4

 9.8

11.0
 8.8
 8.4
 7.8
 7.7
11.3
 9.5
12.0
10.0
 9.4
 9.4
 9.2
 8.0
 6.5
 6.6
 7.0
10.2
                   4:30 P
                   5:30
                   6:30
                   7:30
                   8:30
                   9:30
                  10:30
                  11:30 PM
                  12:30 AM
                     :30
                     :30
                     :30
                     :30
                   5:30
                   6:30
                   7:30
                   8:30
                   9:30
                  10:30
                  11:30 AM
                  12:30 PM
       M..
1:
2:
3:
4:
 8.8
12.0
 9.4
11.3

 7.7
10.0
 8.3
 8.9
 8.9
 7.4
 9.8
 8.2
 7.4
 7.0
 6.9
 6.8
 6.3
 6.6

11.0
 7:30 AM
 8:30
 9:30
10:30
11:30 AM
12:30 PM
  :30
  :30
  :30
                      1:
                      2;
                      3:
 4:30
 5:
 6:
 7;
  :30
  :30
  :30
 8:30
 9:30
10:30
11:30 PM
12:30 AM
  :30
  :30
  :30
  :30
                      1:
                      2:
                      3:
                      4:
                                         5:30
 4.7

 5.8

 8.4

11.5

12.9

11.2

10.0

11.2

 7.4

 7.0

10.0

 6.0
Note:  For most loadings NH_ Ammonia Range 5 to 13 mg/1
                               746

-------
     Analysis of the performance of the pilot plant was
begun after an adequate bibmass had been established on the
surface of the media.  From this point and throughout the
course of the study it was apparent that the RBC units could
consistently produce an effluent with less than 0.5 mg/1 of
ammonia, providing that sufficient alkalinity was available.
     The establishment of loading criteria therefore remainec
as the primary concern of the study.  Figure 2 illustrates
the results of the analyses performed from mid-August througl
November, 1977, and indicates a linear relationship between
pounds of ammonia applied to the RBC units and pounds of
ammonia removed, for the range 0.04 to 0.4 pounds NH -N/1000
ft^-day.  This linear relationship between pounds applied
and. pounds removed has been established in other studies.
(3) (4).  ~  '                   '                      ;    '
     Figures 3 and 4 present the efficiency of the RBC units
with respect to ammonia removal.  Figure 3 represents all
the data points while Figure 4 contains only those points.
for which the influent ammonia concentration to the RBC units
was greater than or equal to 6.0 mg/1.  It is evident from
these efficiency plots that the removal of ammonia was
greater than 95 percent for loadings up to 0.2 pounds NHg-
applied per 1000 square feet of surface area-day.
     In addition, for loadings up to 0.4 pounds NHL-N appliec
1000 s.f.-day, the removal rate was generally greater than
90 percent.                                           r
     During the course of the pilot study the temperature
ranged from 9° C to  19.5° C with the typical value being
16° to  17° C.
     In this range, the temperature did not appear to have
a  significant affect on the efficiency of ammonia removal in
the RBC units.
     During the course of the study a number of  sequential
sampling  runs were conducted following an immediate  increase
in the hydraulic load to simulate a peak flow.  The  sequen-
tial sampling was done in an attempt to trace a plug of
wastewater flow through the unit.
     Figures  5 through 7 show the ammonia nitrogen concen-
tration  levels through the pilot units for both pre-peak
equilibrium  loading  rates and peak  loading rates.  Table 4
indicates the  ammonia  loading rates for the  same peaking
experiments.
     At  application  rates  lower than  0.2  Ib NH3-N/day-1000'
s.f. the  amount of ammonia removed  virtually  doubled as  the
application  rate doubled.  As  indicated in Figures 5 thru  7
                             747

-------
   O.4
   0.3
o
 I
o
o
o
tn
m
o
UJ
Q.
Q.
3-10 0.2

z
   O.I
                ©  UNIT  I DATA



                H  UNIT 2 DATA
0 Q
                                                      ©/©
                    O.I
                                  O.2
                                                O.3
                                                               0.4
                     NH, REMOVED,  LB&/ IOOO FT. — DAY
                       O
         FIGURE  2.   NH3-N  APPLIED  VS  NH3~N  REMOVAL
                              748

-------
                                                   00

                                                  -Q
*  2






0  Q

                                                        Q
                                                        UJ


                                                        Q.
                                                        0.
             a
         0
         ©
                 /
                /   Q
              0
     R
         H/ Q  0


         '
H/ Q


  B0    ©       Q
   E3       13©
   ©   _


         8
                    S
                                            Q   E
S
           Q3AOH3H  VINOMWV  !N33U3d
                                                                 O
                                                                 CO
                                                                 f
                                                                 UJ
                                                      a.
                                                      a.
                                                       »
                                                         10

                                                         UJ
                                                         a:

                                                         o
                                                   q
                                                  "o"
                                   749

-------
     2  2

     —  CM
     1-  H

     i  §

     0  Q
                          o/
             B
         ©            0
         O   © E
     O  /

       B/




      /B
                                                  CO

                                                  o
                                                      X
                                                      UJ
                                                             o
                                                             UJ
                                           o
                                           o
                                           o
                                        •si
                                           a
                                           UJ
                                           a.
                                           a.



                                           xw
                                                                UJ
                                                                UJ
                                                                cc
                                                                o
                                                             UJ

                                                             K
                                        CM

                                        '6
                                                                
-------
   10-
              FIGURE  5 «    TOR  9/27/77
               lAK  LOAD - 0.26 #/DAY-lOOOFT?
                    PEAK  LOAD = 0.32 «/DAY — lOOOFT.
                       - AVE. LOAD * 0.13 «/D»— lOOOFT?
              -Q	©	
                         2 STAGE  3
m   5-
              FIGURE  6'    FOR 8/18/77
PEAK LOAD * 0.2»/DAY— lOOOFT.
      AVE. LOAD * O.I «/DAY— IOOO FT?
                         2 STAGE  3
              FIGURE  7 »     FOR  9/21/77
                   PEAK LOAD = 0.42 «/DAY — IOOO FT?
                        ME. LOAD« 0.21 «/OAY —IOOOFT*
       PEAK  LOADING  TEST  RESULTS
                     751

-------
the effluent concentrations of ammonia were slightly higher
under peak conditions.  With the exception of the run when
the peak loading factor was increased from 0.2 to 0.4 Ib-
NH,-N per day per 1000 ft.2 shown in Figure 7, the effect
of 4 stage operation attenuated decreases in removal effi-
ciency due to peaking.   This was the only case where the
effluent ammonia concentration exceeded 1 mg/1.

     Table 4.  Effects of Peak Loading on NH,-N Removal
  Q       Detention    NH -N          Removed
(gpm)     time (hrs)   Applied     „ #/day-
                     #/day-1000 ft.   1000 ft.
                                          %
                                       Removal
0.8'
1.6 *
1.1
2.2 *

1.3
2.6 *
1.3
1.85 *
1.3
2.25 *
0.8
1.6 *
0.9
1.85 *
1.0
1.9 *
2.5
1.25

1.82
0.91

1.54
0.77
  54
  08
1.54
0.88
2.5
1.25
2.22
1.08
2.0
1.05
0.1
0.22

0.16
0.33

0.13
0.25

0.1
0.26

0.13
•0.32

0.1
0.22
0.2
0.42

0.11
0.21
0.098
0.20

0.155
0.306

0.125
0.23

0.95
0.239

0.126
0.286

0.98
0.187
0.187
0.320

0.108
0.192
91


93


92


92


89


85


76

92
* Flow values from an instant flow peak and represent the
loading which gave the least efficient treatment.
     Table 4, which summarizes the significant parameters
observed during the peak loading studies, indicates that
good removal efficiencies were maintained even when substrate
loading rates were doubled and hydraulic retention time
halved.
     The results of the pilot study indicated that the eff-
luent BOD,, from the RBC units averaged approximately 8 mg/1.
                            752

-------
These samples were either collected from the 55 gal. drum
clarifiers, or samples collected from stage 4 .of the RBC's
and allowed to settle, for 30 minutes.  The soluble portion
of the effluent was approximately 56% and averaged 4 to 5
mg/1 of BOD,..  The addition of alum to the last stage of
the pilot RBC units further reduced the effluent five day
BOD to an average value .of less than 2 mg/1.
     The average suspended solids content of the influent
was 47 mg/1, the fourth stage of the RBC contained about
53 mg/1, whereas- the effluent from the units averaged 32
mg/1.., of which approximately 80 percent were, volatile.
     For hydraulic loadings up to 1.80 gpm/s.f. (2.0 gpm)
there appeared to be little to no net solids production. The
settled effluent averaged 16 mg/1 of suspended solids and it
would appear that the suspended solids in the effluent from
a clarifier following the RBC can be maintained at under 20
to 30 mg/1 for low hydraulic loading rates.  The solids
determinations during the pilot studies included suspended
solids from the existing tr.ickling filters which contributed
a relatively high percentage of colloidal matter.

Processes Selection and Design of the Wastewater Treatment
Facility

     Four processes for the removal or conversion of ammonia
were investigated to determine their cost-effectiveness, in
accordance with EPA criteria.  The four processes were as
follows:   (a) nitrification using Rotating Biological Con-
tactors (RBC); (b) nitrification by aeration in a plug flow
reactor;  (c) ammonia removal by breakpoint chlorination; and
(d) ammonia removal by selective ion-exchange.
     Nitrification using RBC was selected as the lowest
total life-cycle cost process, although its capital costs
are somewhat higher than the other processes.  In addition,
the overall advantages of process stability and flexibility
as well as substantially lower .operation and maintenance
other than occasional lubrication of the drives and it
requires significantly less attention during operation than
does the aeration system.
     In order to utilize the existing facilities to the most
economical degree, and to keep the operation and maintenance
costs as low as practical, the present method of treatment
by primary sedimentation followed by trickling filters will
be retained.  As shown previously, the performance of the
plant as of late has been of the highest quality to be	
                             753

-------
expected of that ,type of process.  In addition, the plant
personnel is thoroughly familiar with the.operation of the
existing treatment facility and could therefore maintain
the present standards of quality with little difficulty.
     The proposed additions to the plant will provide ter-
tiary treatment to reduce the levels of phosphorus and
ammonia-nitrogen in the effluent.  This secondary stage in
the treatment process ideally complements the trickling fil-
ter operation because trickling filters will produce an
effluent with sufficient BOD to maintain the nitrifying or-
ganisms (See Figure 8).
     The pilot plant study established that the RBC process
is capable of achieving greater than 95 percent removal of
ammonia, up t,o an ammonia loading rate of 0."2 pounds NH,-N
per 1000 square feet of surface area per day, provided that
sufficient alkalinity is available in the wastewater.  At
the projected ammonia load for the year 2000, some 3,200,000
square feet of surface area- would be required for this load-
ing rate.  In order to provide this amount of surface area,
it was decided that four (4) trains consisting of six (6)
shafts, each 25 feet long, would be utilized.  It was felt
that the four separate trains would provide the desired deg-
ree of flexibility in the system and six shafts per train
would insure that sufficient surface area was provided to
prevent ammonia breakthrough due to peak flow loadings.
The first two (2) shafts of media in each train will be fab-
ricated of so-called "standard density" media, that is,
approximately 100,000 s.f. per shaft.  The remaining four  (4)
shafts in each train will be fabricated of "high density"
media or about 150,000 s.f. per shaft.  In this manner,
problems associated with "bridging" of the media due to over-
loading in the first and second stages can be avoided.  In
addition, the six stages of media provide sufficient surface
area for carbonaceous BOD removal in the first two stages
of each unit.
     Flexibility in each train will be provided through the
utilization of removable wooden baffles between shafts.  The
amount .of surface area per stage and the number of stages
per train can then be varied to suit operating conditions.
Alkalinity will be provided immediately before the RBC
process in the form of hydrated lime.  Hydrated lime was
chosen as the source of alkalinity due to its lower cost and
local availability.  It is anticipated that the alkalinity
will be a minimum of 200 mg/1 in the influent to the RBC.
                            754

-------
          AERATED SEPTAGE
            SLUDGE
            THICKENING
         SLUDGE
         DEWATERING
         L.
 GRIT  REMOVAL


 COMMINUTION


 FLOW METERING




 PRIMARY CLARIFICATION





 FLOW  CONTROL



 TRICKLING  FILTER




 MAIN PUMPING STATION

-ALUM  ADDITION

 INTERMEDIATE CLARIFICATION

-LIME ADDITION


 ROTATING  BIOLOGICAL
      CONTACTORS





 ALUM  ADDITION




 FINAL CLARIFICATION





 FINAL  FILTRATION



 ULTRA-VIOLET DISINFECTION
SCHEMATIC     FLOW

         DIAGRAM
 .CASCADE  AERATOR
                                                       FIGURE  8.
                             755

-------
     Flexibility was also designed into the phosphorus
removal system, in that two different chemicals for the
removal of phosphorus can be stored and fed at one time, and
chemicals can be added and mixed with the wastewater at three
separate locations.  Laboratory treatability studies estab-
lished that alum would provide sufficient removal of phos-
phorus to meet the discharge limitation of 1.0 mg/1 consis-
tently.  In addition, the study established that the addition
of alum immediately following the trickling filters would be
the least costly method.  This is due to the low pH (5.8 to
6.2) of the trickling filter effluent.  Removal of phosphorus
with alum after the RBC process would require substantially
more chemical due to the elevated pH of the wastewater at
this point.  However, chemical addition and mixing facilities
will be provided after the RBC process for removal of phos-
phorus in the final clarifiers.  In addition, chemical
additions can be made to the headworks at the aerated grit
chamber for phosphorus removal in the primary clarifiers.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

     1.  A linear relationship between pounds of ammonia
applied versus pounds of ammonia removed existed for ammonia
loadings ranging from 0.04 to 0.4 pounds NH -N per 1000 s.f-
day.
     2.  That the removal of ammonia was greater than 95
percent for loadings up to 0.2 pounds NH_-N applied/1000 s.f.
day, and generally above 90 percent removal for loadings up
to 0.4 pounds NH3~N applied/1000 s.f.-day.
     3.  That the RBC units were able to respond well to
peak hydraulic loading.
     4.  That there is little to no net production of solids
within the RBC units.  The solids which were produced did
not exhibit good settling characteristics.
                               756

-------
References

1.  "Process Design Manual for Nitrogen Control",   U.S.
    Environmental Protection Agency - Technology Transfer.
2.  Saunders, F.C. and Pope, R.L., "Nitrification with
    Rotating Biological Contactor Systems", Env. Resources
    Center Technical Report (ERG 06-78), Georgia Institute
    of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, October 1978.
3.  O'Shaughnessy,J.C., Blanc, F.C., Brooks, P.,
    Silbovitz, A. and Stanton, R. "Nitrification of
    Municipal Wastewater Using Rotating Biological
    Contactors", Proceedings First National Symposium/
    Workshop on Rotating Biological Contactor Technology,
    University of Pittsburg, Vol. II, pp. 1193-1219,
    June 1980.
4.  Odegaard, H. and Rusten, B., "Nitrogen Removal in
    Rotating Biological Contactors Without the Use of
    External- Carbon Source", Proc. First National Symposium
    on RBC Technology, University of Pittsburg, Vol. II,
    pp. 1301-1317, June 1980.
                          ,757

-------
     IMPROVEMENT OF NITRIFICATION IN ROTATING BIOLOGICAL
      CONTACTORS BY MEANS OF ALKALINE CHEMICAL ADDITION
     James M. Stratta, U. S. Army Environmental Hygiene
     Agency, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.

     David A. Long, Department of Civil Engineering, The
     Pennsylvania State University, University Park,
     Pennsylvania

     Michael C. Doherty, U. S. Army Environmental Hygiene
     Agency, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.

INTRODUCTION

     The need to achieve compliance with ammonia-nitrogen
discharge limitations and the current emphasis on energy
conservation have resulted in the utilization of RBC tech-
nology for the nitrification of secondary wastewater
effluents.  By the end of the 1970s, four pilot scale
efforts, independent of the RBC industry, had been completed
which demonstrated that the RBC could nitrify successfully
secondary wastewater effluent (1, 2, 3, 4).  In 1979,
approximately 70 percent of the RBC systems in the United
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private
views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflect-
ing the views of the Department of the Army or the Depart-
ment of Defense.
                            758

-------
States were .designed to remove carbonaceous biochemical
oxygen demand (CBOD).  Another,25 percent of the RBC systems
were designed to remove CBOD and for nitrification in the
same RBC units.  The remaining 5 percent were constructed
to nitrify secondary wastewater effluents in order to
achieve ammonia-nitrogen effluent discharge limitations  (5)
Initial evaluations of full .scale nitrifying RBC facilities
reveal that they have not been completely satisfactory  (6,7)
Hitdlebaugh (7) reported that an RBC facility, built for
CBOD removal and nitrification, failed to meet design
specifications during both winter and summer operations.
The inability to meet CBOD and ammonia-nitrogen limitations
during the summer was attributed to relatively low dissolved
oxygen (DO) concentrations  (less than 1 mg/1). in the initial
nitrifying stages and a low pH  (less than ph 7.0) in the
latter nitrifying stages.  The DO level increased during
winter operations and CBOD was removed sufficiently to
achieve design expectations.  Ammonia-nitrogen removal  also
improved during the winter but not sufficiently to achieve
design projections or effluent  limitations.  Recommendations
from this study included the use of alkaline chemical feed
systems to maintain  optimum pH  levels in order to improve
nitrification.
     Nitrification within the RBC biofilm is essentially
a  two-step microbiological process .which utilizes two groups
of autotrophic bacteria of  the  family Nitrobacteraceae.  The
first group of bacteria oxidizes ammonia to, nitrite and the
second group  of bacteria oxidizes nitrite to nitrate.   The
Nitrosomonas  and Nitrobacter  genera are considered  to be the
predominant nitrifying bacteria inhabiting  the wastewater
environment.   Heterotrophic nitrification also occurs when
nitrite or  nitrate  is produced  from organic or inorganic
compounds by  heterotrophic  organisms.  Over 100 heterotrophic
species  (including  fungi) have  been identified which are
capable of  heterotrophic nitrification.  However, the  overall
contribution  to  the  oxidized  nitrogen  forms by heterotrophic
nitrification is considered to  be relatively  small  (8).
      The  growth  rates  of nitrifying bacteria  are much  slower
than the  growth  rates  o'f heterotrophic bacteria.  This
important  distinction  accounts  for  the inability  of nitri-
 fication  to proceed simultaneously with  CBOD  removal when
high concentrations  of  organic  material  (greater  than  30 mg/1
 of BOD)  are present in the  wastewater.   Minimum  doubling
 times reported for  the  ammonia-oxidizing bacteria are  from
 8 to 17 hours (9).   Because the growth rates  for  nitrite-
                            759

-------
oxidizers are greater than the growth rates for ammonia-
oxidizers (9,10), elevated nitrite concentrations normally
do not persist and the ammonia-oxidation step controls
the total amount of ammonia which is oxidized to nitrate
within the wastewater environment.  Carbon dioxide  (C02) is
the carbon source for these autotrophic nitrifying bacteria
(11).  Although some nitrifying bacteria have been observed
to use organic compounds, they were not observed to utilize
these organic compounds as the sole carbon source for growth
(12).  The generation of bacterial biomass per unit of
ammonia oxidized (cell yield) is quite small.  The total
yield for both Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter has been observed
to be from 0.06 to 0.20 gram of cells per gram of ammonia
oxidized (9).  The nitrification of 20 mg/1 of ammonia-
nitrogen generates approximately 2 mg/1 of solids (10).
Therefore, the net amount of inorganic carbon required for
this amount  of nitrification is quite low.  McGhee(13)
reported that the inorganic carbon requirements for the
nitrite oxidation step could be met without inorganic
carbon being present in the bulk solution.  The utilizable
source of inorganic carbon was the C0« generated from
endogenous respiration within the biorilm.
     The simplified oxidative reactions below describe the
salient aspects of the microbial oxidation of ammonia.
The microorganisms derive energy from these reactions;
this energy  is used for C09 fixation.
Ammonia Oxidation:
NH,
               2HC0
                                             (1)
Nitrite Oxidation:
       0.50
                         -"•"NO,
                                             (2)
Overall Reaction:
NH,
20
             2 HC0
(3)
As can be seen  from Equation  1,  the nitrification process
results in  the  production  of  acid which neutralizes  the
alkalinity  in the wastewater.  Theoretically,  7.1 mg/1 of
alkalinity  is destroyed  for each 1 mg/1 of  ammonia oxidized.
The destruction of alkalinity results  in pH depression.
                              760

-------
The actual pH depression is mitigated somewhat by the
removal of carbonic acid through the stripping of CO  'from
the wastewater surface (10).  However, under low alkalinity
conditions, pH depression is enhanced due to the reduced
buffer capacity of the wastewater.  The level of alkalinity
within wastewaters varies widely.  The major factor influenc-
ing the amount of alkalinity present is the source of the
carriage water, or the drinking water supply.  High
alkalinities normally are associated with ground water
supplies and much lower alkalinities are associated with
surface supplies.  Domestic wastewater contributes from
50 to 200 mg CaCO /I to the natural alkalinity of the
carriage water (15).  Therefore, the amount of alkalinity
in a domestic wastewater may range from less than 100 mg
CaCO /I to several hundred mg CaCO /I.  The net.effect of
such variations in alkalinity is to provide a different
buffering capacity for each wastewater treatment system.
Domestic wastewaters normally contain from 12 to 25 mg/1 of
ammonia-nitrogen.  The range of alkalinity destroyed during
the nitrification of these concentrations of ammonia is
85 mg CaCO,./! to 178 mg CaCO,./!.  Obviously, the pR depress-
ion resulting from nitrification can be slight for low
ammonia-high alkalinity wastewaters or significant for
high ammonia-low alkalinity wastewaters.  Wastewater pH
levels are typically around pH 7.5.  However, pH depression
to below pH 7.0 is common for low alkalinity wastewaters.
     The level,of pH has an important effect on the nitri-
fication process.  There have been a number of researchers
since the turn of the century who have addressed the
subject of the effect of pH on nitrification.  Those
researchers who have made contributions pertinent to
this study are listed in reverse chronological order in
Table 1.  It is interesting to note the large variation in
the effect of pH on biological nitrification that is
reported in the literature.  The variation in the effect
of pH on nitrification is due in large measure to the
nature of the experiments undertaken, i.e., the homogeniety
of culture involved (pure versus mixed culture); scale of
the experiment (laboratory to full scale); nature of the
biofilm (suspended versus fixed film) and a variety of
(and frequently unspecified) acclimation times utilized in
the experiments.
     Several investigators  (1, 3, 15, 16) within recent years
have attempted to provide more information on nitrification
within a fixed film mode.  Haug and McCarty (15) utilized
                             761

-------
Table 1.  Literature Review of Optimum pH
          Values for Nitrification,.
Ref.
3
1
13
17
18
16
15
19
20
21
22
23,24
25
26
27
28
29
Author
Miller, et al.
Borchardt, et al.
McGhee
Srna & Baggaley
Button & LaRocca
Huang & Hop son
Haug & McCarty
Mulbarger
Wild, et al.
Loveless & Painter
Downing & Knowles
Andersen
Boon & Landelot
Engel & Alexander
Bushwell & Shiota
Hoffman & Lees
Meyer ho ff
Year
1979
1978
1975
1975
1975
1974
1972
1972
1971
1968
1967
1964
1962
1958
1954
1952
1917
Optimum pH
8.0-8.5
7.1-8.6
8.0-9.0
7.45
8.4-8.6
8.4-9.0
7.8-8.3
8.4
8.4
7.5-8.0
7.2-8.0
8.4-8.5
7.0-8.6
7.0-9.0
8.0-8.5
8.0-9.0
8.5-8.8
8.5-9.0
Organism or
System Studied
RBC (Pilot)
RBC (Pilot)
A.S. (Lab)
Sub. Filt. (Lab)
A.S.
Bio film (Lab)
Sub. Filt. (Lab)
A.S.
A.S.
Nitrosomonas
—
Nitrosomonas
Nitrobacter
Nitrosomonas
Nitrosomonas
Nitrosomonas
Nitrosomonas
Nitrobacter
                      762

-------
a laboratory scale fixed film submerged reactor and a
synthetic wastewater and performed a short term pH-
nitrification study (18 hours at each pH value) using a
biofilm developed at neutral pH .and observed essentially
the same rate of nitrification at pH 6.5 as at pH 9.0.
At pH 6.0, the observed rate of.nitrification was reduced
to approximately 42 percent of the maximum rate and nitri-
fication essentially stopped at pH 5.5.  However, after
only 10 days of operation at pH 6.0, the submerged filter
was reported to have acclimated sufficiently to perform
at the maximum rate of nitrification.  This finding
demonstrates the ability of nitrifying organisms to acclimate
to low pH condition.  The reason for this unique finding
may be due in part to non-equilibrium conditions existing
within the submerged filter after the startup period.  Huang
and Hopson (16) utilized a laboratory scale inclined fixed
film surface and a synthetic wastewater to evaluate the
effect of pH on nitrification.  Their experiment examined
the short term (less than 10 hours) effect of pH on the
nitrification process and produced a maximum rate of nitri-
fication at pH 8.4 to pH 9.0 with approximately 25 percent
of the maximum rate occurring at pH 6.0.  After three weeks
of acclimation at pH 6.6, the rate of nitrification was
approximately 85 percent of the maximum rate observed.
     Borchardt (1) performed a short term pH-nitrifleation
study utilizing a 0.6 meter pilot RBC treating domestic
wastewater effluent from a trickling filter in a laboratory
where ammonia, alkalinity and pH were controlled.  The
rate of nitrification was examined at eleven different
levels of alkalinity after a short but undefined acclimation
period.  The results of this short term study revealed a
nearly constant rate of nitrification between pH 7.1 and
8.6.  Approximately 25 percent of the maximum rate of
nitrification was observed at pH 6.5 and zero nitrification
was indicated at pH 6.0.  Borchardt was careful to point
out the limitations of attempting to extrapolate his
short term data into the long term.
     Miller  (3) most recently reported on a pilot scale
0.5 meter RBC treating domestic wastewater effluent from
a pilot trickling filter wherein significantly greater
rates of nitrification were observed at elevated pH levels
(pH 8.0 to pH 8.5) than at neutral pH  (approximately
pH 7.1).  This nitrification study is unique in that lime
addition for phosphorus removal preceded the nitrification
process and the nitrifying RBC stages had acclimated at
                            763

-------
the elevated pH levels.  A  transition in biofilm performance
was observed when the elevated pH of the wastewater was
reduced to the neutral pH range.  Nitrification performance
initially remained unchanged.  After approximately four
days, the performance level started to deteriorate.  In "
nine days, the performance  had reverted to a lower nitri-
fication level.  This latter finding was not discussed
fully by Miller; however, it is important because it
helps to establish potential physical differences between
the biofilms developed at neutral and elevated pH levels.
This situation was not observed by the other investigators
using fixed films mentioned above because none ever
attempted to acclimate biofilms at the elevated pH levels.
Such differences cannot be  assumed to be purely indicative
of only the pH dependent rates of microbial nitrification.
These differences also are  reflective of the entire hetero-
genous population developed within each biofilm which
dictate film development, cohesion, and retention
characteristics (sludge age). There is essentially no
information within these wastewater nitrification studies
which addresses changes in  biofilm and microbial popula-
tions under various pH conditions.  In general, this
important consideration has been ignored in such waste-
water research studies.  However, current research efforts
such as those by Olem (30), LaMotta (31) and Characklis (32)
are starting to examine more closely the mechanics of
biofilm development and the characterization of microbial
populations.
     The addition of alkaline chemicals to wastewater
treatment systems to increase pH and provide added buffer
capacity has been attempted with varying degrees of success.
Heidman (33) conducted a pilot study at the Blue Plains
WWTP using an activated sludge system which incorporated
pH controlled nitrification.  This study was inconclusive
because it failed to demonstrate the relative nitrification
without chemical addition.  Hutton (18) demonstrated
the feasibility of optimizing the nitrification of high
ammonia strength industrial wastewaters with alkaline
chemical addition.  Lue-Ling (34) reported success in
using alkaline chemical addition to nitrify high ammonia
strength lagoon supernatant with EJBCs.   Hitdlebaugh (35)
attempted to enhance the nitrification of domestic waste-
water with RBCs through alkaline chemical addition; however,
the results were inconclusive.   The literature fails to
address the efficacy of optimizing domestic wastewater
                             764

-------
nitrification within the RBC system through pH control as
well as the use of alternative pH control'schemes.

OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE

     The objectives of this research were to:

     1.  Establish the relative rates of nitrification
         for domestic wastewater treatment within an
         acclimated RBC fixed film system as a function
         of pH.
     2.  Observe and characterize the relative changes in
         the RBC biofilm as a function of" pH.
     3.  Evaluate the efficacy of chemical addition to
         improve nitrification within an RBC fixed film
         system through the maintenance of an optimum pH.
     4.  Evaluate alternative alkaline chemicals for pH
         controlled nitrification for the RBC.
     5.  Develop design criteria, as appropriate, for pH'
         controlled nitrification for the RBC.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES     . '    .. '

     Pilot scale 0.5 meter diameter RBC systems were used
in this research to nitrify high rate trickling filter
effluent from the Pennsylvania- State University (PSU)
wastewater treatment plant  (WWTP).  The effect of pH
on nitrification within an RBC was evaluated using four
single stage RBCs operating in parallel (Figure 1).  The
pH of the RBC systems treating the PSU WWTP trickling
filter effluent was varied first from pH  6,. 3 to pH 7.5
and then from pH 7.6 to pH 8.8 and the relative levels of
nitrification at the various pH's then were observed.
High pH and low pH environments were created by adding
sodium hydroxide and sulfuric acid, respectively, to the
wastewater streams after clarification  (Figure. 1).  Each
observation period was started with no biofilm on the
RBC discs and lasted approximately ten weeks.
     The effect of alkaline chemical addition was evaluated
utilizing five 2-stage RBCs operating in  parallel (Figure
2).  The level of nitrification of a low  pH 2-stage
control RBC system  (control) was compared against the
nitrification level of four other 2-stage RBC systems
receiving four different alkaline chemicals.  The four
alkaline chemicals used were calcium hydroxide, sodium
carbonate, sodium hydroxide, and sodium bicarbonate.
                             765

-------
 FLOW DIVIDER
RBC UNITS*-
                          CLARIFIER -
                          TEMPERATURE
                          CONTROLLER
                                                 PUMP
                                ®H2S04or NaOH
                                J\\
                            ../    \   X
\   X
        pH CONTROLLER
 Figure  1.   Schematic Diagram of the Pilot RBC Units for
             the Low pH-  and High pH-Nitrification Study
                        766

-------
          RECYCLE
        V  PUMP  J
                        CLARI FIER -
                        TEMPERATURE
                        CONTROLLER
                        FLOW Dl V IDER
        NaOH
     r
               NaHCOa
          1-1
pH CONTROLLER
2-1
          1-2
             Ca(OH)2
3-1
2-2
4-1
3-2
4-2
                                          PUMP
5-1
                                             \
                                               RBC - STAGE
5-2
      Figure 2.  Schematic  Diagram of the 2-Stage RBC
                Systems of the Alkaline Chemical Addition
                Study.
                         767

-------
The alkaline chemicals were added to the first stage only.
The first stages of the calcium hydroxide, sodium carbonate,
and sodium hydroxide RBC systems were maintained at the
optimum pH level for nitrification (approximately pH 8.5).
The first stages of the sodium bicarbonate and the control
RBC systems were maintained at pH 7.5 and pH 7.0, respectively.
The low pH wastewater was created by adding sulfuric acid
prior to clarification and the alkaline chemicals then were
added directly to the first stage of each RBC.  Ammonium
chloride was added to the wastewater during PSU break
periods to augment the low influent ammonia-nitrogen...  There
was no biomass on the discs at the start of the test.  The
observation period for this part of the study lasted
approximately 11 weeks.
     Wastewater sampling was accomplished by compositing
grab samples on influents and effluents.  Biofilm sampling
and analyses were performed in accordance with modifications
of the procedures reported by Olem (30).  The most
probable numbers (MPN) of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria were
determined using a modification of the Nitrosomonas MPN
technique of Alexander and Clark (36) which was reported
by LaBeda and Alexander (37) as well as Rowe (38).  The
nitrite-oxidizing bacteria MPN values were determined
using a modification of the Nitrobacter MPN technique of .
Alexander and Clark (36) which was reported by LaBeda and
Alexander (37) and Ghiorse and Alexander (39).  The
enumeration of heterotrophic bacteria was accomplished by
spread plating serial dilutions of Modified Taylor's Media
(40).  Detailed descriptions of all sampling and analytical
procedures are found in Stratta (41).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Low pH-Nitrification Study

     This research phase was devoted to the evaluation
of the relative rates of nitrification in single stage
RBC systems operated at pH 7.5, 7.1, 6.5 and 6.3.  The
pH 7.5 RBC treated the unaltered wastewater and served
as the control.  Data showing the operational characteristics
of the four RBC systems are presented in Table 2.  The rates
of nitrification which initially developed for the
pH 7.5 and the pH 7.1 RBC systems were greater than
the nitrification rates of the two lower pH RBC systems.
Nitrification was not established in the pH 6.3 RBC system
                           768

-------
         Table 2.   Pilot Single-Stage Nitrifying
                   RBC Operating Characteristics
Secondary Clarifier

     Surface Settling Rate (@6.8 m3/d) -  5.9 m3/d-m2

     Detention Time (@6.8 m3/d)        -  2.1 hr
RBC
     Number of RBCs

     Stages per RBC

     Discs per Stage

     Disc Diameter

     Disc Area - Total

     Rotational Speed

     Peripheral Speed

     Hydraulic Loading0
-  4

-  1

-  9

-  0.5 m

-  5.3 m2

-  13 rpm

-  0.34 m/sec

-  81 l/m2-d
aThe hydraulic loading  for all  four RBC units was nominally
 81 l/m2-d  (2 gal/d'ft2).  The  hydraulic  loading calculation
 is based upon the assumption that each RBC  is  the  first
 stage of a 4-stage RBC.
                             769

-------
during the first 25 days of operation.  Two short-term
pH excursions may have had an adverse impact on nitrification
development on the pH 6.3 RBC.  On Day 27, the pH of the
pH 6.3 unit was adjusted upward to pH 6.7 in an attempt
to obtain additional information regarding the nitrification
rate between pH 6.5 and pH 7.1; this RBC is referred to
hereafter as the 6.3/6.7 RBC.  Based upon nitrification
performance, a period of relative equilibrium was established
by about Day 37 for the pH 7.5, 7.1, and 6.5 RBC units.
Data on the relative amounts of ammonia-nitrogen removed
by the RBCs are presented in Table 3.  The rate of nitri-
fication of the pH 7.1 RBC system was 96 percent of that
observed at pH 7.5 and the rate for the pH 6.5 RBC was 80
percent of the rate for the pH 7.5 RBC.  Because of the
long period of time required for nitrification to become
established in the pH 6.3/6.7 RBC, data for this unit are
not included in Table 3.  Nitrogen balances for each
         Table 3.  Relative Rates of Nitrification for
                   RBC Systems Operating Under Low
        	pH Conditionsa	
RBC pH
Ammonia-N Removed
  g NH3-N/m2-d
Percent of
 Maximum
7.5
7.1
6.5
2.5
2.4
2.0
100
96
80
 Based upon data from Day 37 to Day 69
of the RBC systems are presented in Table 4.  The slightly
lower nitrogen recoveries for the two higher pH systems
might reflect small nitrogen losses associated with
denitrification within the heavier biofilms as well as minor
losses due to ammonia stripping.
                            770

-------
         Table  4.   RBC  Nitrogen Balances  for  the
                   Low  pH-Nitrification Study
RBC
1
2
3
4
pH
7.5 .
7.1
6.5
6.3/6.7
Total Nitrogen ...
Influent
19.5(23)°
19.. 6 (23)
19, 7 (24)
19.6(23)
- mg/1
Effluent ;
19.3(23)
19.7(23)
20.3(24)
20.2(23)'
Percent
Recovery
99
100
103
103
aBased upon data from Day 37 to Day 69

 Total nitrogen is total oxidized nitrogen plus total
 Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN)

CNumber in parenthesis is the number of samples utilized
 in the total nitrogen determinations.
     The four RBCs developed biofilms which could be
sensed by touch within 48 hours.  .A noticeable bronze color
developed after five days of operation.  By the tenth
day, all RBC systems had developed thin and highly uniformly
textured coatings which possessed a visually apparent
gradation.  The heaviest biofilm appeared in the pH 7.5 RBC
and the lightest growth of biofilm was in the pH 6.3/6.7 RBC.
All four RBC units showed some degree of sloughing by
Day 19 with the greatest sloughing occurring in the
pH 6.3/6.7 RBC.  The, biofilm color changed from bronze
to brown with increasing age and increased biomass.  After
the loss of the-initial biofilm uniformity, the biofilm
became increasingly  patchy with time and decreasing pH.  At
the conclusion of this phase of the study, the non-         :
uniformity of the biofilm was quite evident visually and
seemed to be related directly to the relative nitrification
rates recorded over  the duration of the study.  The  .
                            771

-------
patchy appearance was attributed mainly to biofilm loss
resulting from hydraulic shear.  However, biofilm sloughing
from the disc surface did occur.
     The RBC disc biofilm development data for all four
RBC systems during the low pH-nitrification study are
presented in Figure 3.  The RBC systems at pH 7.5 and
7.1 showed the best performance and had the most disc
biofilm.  The pH 6.5 RBC showed a lower level of performance
and less biofilm.  The RBC which was operated initially
at pH 6.3 and later adjusted to pH 6.7 had the lowest
performance level throughout most of the 69-day study
and also developed the least amount of biofilm.  The
maximum ammonia-oxidation levels for the pH 7.5, 7.1, and
6.5 RBC's were achieved when the biofilm masses were
approximately 2.0, 2.2, and 1.5 mg/cm2 respectively.  In-
creases in disc biomass did not enhance the nitrification
rates for any of these RBC systems.  The pH 6.3/6.7 RBC
added biofilm during the first three weeks of operation
at a rate comparable to that of the pH 7.5 RBC yet
showed no nitrification capacity.  This result indicates
that, at least initially, organisms other than nitrifying
bacteria were inhabiting the RBC discs.
     The relative geometric mean data for the nitrifying
bacterial populations per unit disc area and per unit
volatile weight for each RBC system after the initial
month of startup are presented in Figure 4.  These graphs
demonstrate clearly that the total number of viable
nitrifying bacteria on each RBC was related directly to
overall RBC nitrification performance.  The higher pH
systems had larger populations of both ammonia-oxidizing
and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria.  The sustained depressed
nitrification performance and the relatively low nitrifying
bacteria populations of the 6.3/6.7 RBC indicated that a
significant period of time was required for complete
autotrophic adjustment in response to system changes under
relatively low pH conditions.  The ratios of ammonia-
oxidizing bacteria to nitrite-oxidizing bacteria for
the pH 7.5, 7.1, 6.5 and 6.3/6.7 RBC units were 16:1, 14:1,
9.4:1 and 3.3:1, respectively.  This observation indicates
that the lower pH systems favor nitrite-oxidizing bacteria
relative to ammonia-oxidizing bacteria.  This conclusion
is shown graphically in Figure 4 which shows that the
number of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria per dvg (dry volatile
gram) decreased with decreasing pH, while the number of
nitrite-oxidizing bacteria per dvg increased for the two
                            772

-------
    0    10    20   30   40   50   60    70
              DAYS OF OPERATION
LEGEND: RBC
1-PH7.5   -

3-pH6.5   -
	2  pH7.1

-•-4-pH 6.3/6.7
  Figure 3.   RBC Disc Biofilm Development for the
            Low pH-Nitrification Study
               773

-------






















'




























	 	 1
1™
T"
OA














	 L.
















|

a/v

































i

































U3JI

































'xwa
.%Jw Q

































e
j
3











...


_L
1

















3
cn





































































































a
















h.

a
N
C
X
o
1
<
^ I
« i
n 1

                                                                                                    CO  >-l
                                                                                                    a  o
                                                                                                    o
                                                                                                   •rl  4-1
                                                                                                   4J  -H
                                                                                                    CC)  0
                                                                                                   §"§
                                                                                                   0  cd
                                                                                                   cd  cu
                                                                                                   O  4J  T3
                                                                                                   •H  -H   3
                                                                                                   ^04-1
                                                                                                   4J  (b  CO
                                                                                                   0)


                                                                                                   O      O

                                                                                                   O  O  4-1
                                                                                                           cd
                                                                                                   a)  cd   o
                                                                                                   i>  -H  -H
                                                                                                   •H  te  <4-l
                                                                                                       CU  -rl
                                                                                                   Cd 4J
                                                                                                  iH  O  4J
                                                                                                   cu  cd  -H
                                                                                                   0)


                                                                                                   S
                                                                                                   bO
                                            774

-------
lower pH RBC units.  The volatile contents for these biofilms
were 82, 83, 84, and 81 percent for the pH 7.5, 7.1, 6.5, and
6.3/6.7 RBCs, respectively.

High pH-Nitrification Study

     This research phase was devoted to the evaluation of the
relative rates of nitrification in single stage RBC systems
operated at pH 7.6, 8.0, 8.5, and 8.8.  The pH 7.6 RBC
treated the unaltered wastewater and served as the control.
The operational characteristics of the four RBC systems were
the same as reported previously in Table 2.  On Day 36, a
pH excursion to approximately pH 11.0 for an estimated
two hours occurred within  the pH 8.8 RBC with rather
dramatic results.  This short-term transient condition
appeared to have  little effect on the ammonia-oxidation
process.  However, the RBC experienced an immediate loss
of nitrite-oxidation capability and a very slow nitrite-
oxidation recovery.  Based upon ammonia removal,  and not
complete oxidation, a period of relative equilibrium was
established after approximately five weeks of operation.
Data on the relative amounts of ammonia-nitrogen  removed
by the RBCs are presented  in Table 5.  The pH 8.8 RBC
     Table 5.   Relative Rates  of Nitrification for RBC
               Systems Operating Under High pH Conditions'1

RBC pH
7.6
8.0
8.5
8.8
Ammonia-N Removed
(g NH3-N/m2-d)
2.0
2.6
3.1
2.9
Percent of
Maximum
65
84
100
94
 aBased upon data from Day 38 to Day 71
                             775

-------
and the pH 8.0 RBC removed 94 and 84 percent as much
ammonia as did the pH 8.5 system, respectively; whereas
the control RBC removed only 65 percent as much ammonia.
Data on the nitrogen balances for the four RBC systems
for this time period are presented in Table 6.  As noted
earlier, the slightly lower nitrogen recoveries at the
higher pH conditions may be due to small nitrogen losses
resulting from ammonia stripping and denitrification within
the heavier biofilms.  These nitrogen recovery results
indicate that ammonia stripping was not a major factor
affecting the change in ammonia levels between pH 7.6 and
pH 8.8.
         Table 6.  RBC Nitrogen Balances for the
                   High pH Nitrification Study
RBC
1
2
3
4
pH
7.6
8.0
8.5
8.8
Total Nitrogen
Influent
21.7(21)°
21.5(21)
21.7(21)
21.8(21)
- mg/1
Effluent
21.1(21)
20.2(21)
20.6(21)
20.8(21)
Percent
Recovery
97
94
95
95
Nitrogen balances are based upon data from Day 38 to Day 71.

 Total nitrogen is total oxidized nitrogen plus total
 Kjeldahl nitrogen  (TKN).

CNumber in parenthesis is  the number of samples utilized in
 the total nitrogen evaluations.
     The  four RBCs developed biofilms which could be sensed
by touch  within  48 hours.  A noticeable reddish-brown bio-
film was  evident on  all  the discs by the third day  of
                             776

-------
operation.  By the eighth day, the four RBCs had developed
thin and highly uniformly textured biofilms which possessed
a visually apparent gradation.  The pH 8.5 and pH 8.8 RBC
biofilms initially developed more rapidly than did the pH
7.6 and pH 8.0 RBC biofilms.  This initial biofilm
gradation was not related to ammonia removal efficiency.
The 'biofilm color had changed from reddish-brown to tan
or bronze on all discs by the 10th day.  By the 13th day
of operation, the two lower pH RBCs had the most uniformly
textured biofilms while the pH 8.5 and pH 8.8 RBCs were
developing a "dimpled" appearance associated with the
heavier biofilms.  The pH 8.8 RBC developed a patchy
appearance and also had started to slough significantly
after only two weeks.  As time progressed, the RBC systems
added biofilm, but their texture became less uniform.
The heavier biofilms appeared to be associated with the
pH 8.0 and pH 8.5 systems.  The pH 8.8 RBC experienced
the greatest biofilm sloughing.  Figure 5 presents the
RBC disc biofilm development data for all four RBG systems
during the high pH-nitrification study.  After the initial
month of operation, the levels of disc biofilm for the
pH 7.6, 8.0, and 8.5 RBCs were related directly to their
relative level of performance.  The pH 8.8 RBC experienced
an initially high rate of biofilm development; however,
it reached a peak mass per unit area concentration on Day 31
and then experienced a continuous biofilm loss.  All four
RBC systems experienced a marked decline in disc biofilm
after the end of the PSU spring term on Day 52 when the
influent CBOD concentration decreased.  The four RBC
systems appeared to achieve an initial maximum level of
nitrification performance in about three weeks.  These
performance levels cooresponded to disc biofilm concentra-
tions of approximately 0.8, 1.0, 1.2 and 1.4 mg/cm2 for the
pH7.6, 8.0, 8.5, and 8.8 RBCs, respectively.  As demonstrated
previously, the increase in disc biomass did not improve the
rate of nitrification for any of the systems.
     The data on the relative geometric mean bacteria
populations per unit of disc area and per unit weight of dry
volatile biofilm for each RBC system after the initial 30
days of operation are presented graphically in Figure 6.
The total numbers of ammonia-oxidizing and heterotrophic
bacteria increased with increasing pH up to pH 8.5 and then
experienced a drop at pH 8.8.  The total number of nitrite-
oxidizing bacteria was greatest at pH 8.0 and decreased at
pH 8.5 and pH 8.8.  The number of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria
relative to the total biofilm population was similar for
                            777

-------

-------
                           a

                           O
                           m
                           cc
                                   o
                                   K
                                   UJ
                                   a

                                   ui
                                   o
                                   ui
ocn
                                                    cd
                                                   •H

                                                    cu  PLI
                                                    4J  ^j
                                                    O
                                                    cd  cu
                                                   ,J3  (-1

                                                   *  *
                                                    CJ  CO
                                                    cd  a
                                                    cu  o
 co  a   •

 o  d  4J
•H  cu  d
•u      P
 cd  oo  o
 s-i  C  o
 CU -H
 e  t=~.  cu
 p m  4-)
 S -rt  Cd
 CU  M i-l
    W  ft
                                                   H-l  ,.;
                                                    o  &
 CO
 4J
 CU
 CO
                                                            CO
                                                            0
                                                            o
                                                        :>> -H
                                                   •H  cd
                                                    OT fi  ni

                                                    S  O  CU
                                                    o u  g
                                                    ft      9
                                                    S O  C
                                                       CO  CU
                                                   T3
                                                    0)  !>.  O
                                                    CO  cd vH
                                                    CU  O  S-J
                                                    !-4  M  4-J
                                                    cd m  o

                                                    CO  CO  CU
                                                    fj  fj  4J
                                                    cd  o  cu
                                                    cu -H ,d
 a   a  d
•H  -H  cd
 !-i  IH
4-J  -H  CO
 CU   CO  CU
 S   co  P
 O   cd i-t
 CU  ^1  cti
o   o  >
                                                   w
                                                   H
                  VD

                   CU

                   E
                  •rl
           779

-------
the pH 7.6, 8.0, and 8.5 systems but greatest at pH 8.8.
Similarly, the heterotrophic population increased with
pH.  However, the nitrite-oxidizing bacteria populations
were nearly identical at pH 7.6 and pH 8.0 but lower at
pH 8.5 and pH 8.8.  The ratios of heterotrophic to ammonia-
oxidizing to nitrite-oxidizing bacteria based on the data
presented in Figure 6 for the pH 7.6, 8.0, 8.5, and 8.8 RBC
units were 12:15:1, 16:16:1, 37:24:1, and 43:48:1, res-
pectively.  In general, these population figures indicate
that the heterotrophic bacteria and the ammonia-oxidizing
bacteria are favored over the nitrite-oxidizing bacteria
with respect to increasing pH.  During this period, the
mean biofilm concentrations were 1.80, 2.26, 2.99, and
1.23 mg/cm2 for the pH 7.6, 8.0, 8.5, and 8.8 RBC units,
respectively.  The volatile content was 86, 86, 83, and 75
percent for the pH 7.6, 8.0, 8.5, and 8.8 RBC units,
respectively.  This lower volatile content of the pH 8.8
RBC was attributed to low level precipitation of calcium
carbonate and entrainment of the precipitate within the
disc biofilm.
     At the conclusion of the 10-week high pH-nitrification
study, the two RBC systems which had been operating at
pH 7.6 and pH 8.5 were utilized in a short-term pH-nitrifi-
cation study wherein the two RBC systems experienced
simultaneous short term changes in pH, i.e. 2 hours
of operation at each pH level.  The pH level started at
pH 9.0 and was decreased progressively downward to
pH 6.0 without interruption.  Alkalinity and pH levels
were maintained in each RBC by direct feed of sodium
hydroxide and sulfuric acid solutions.  This test was
run twice  (Day 73 and Day 79) with similar results.  The
average values of nitrogen removal data obtained from
these two runs are shown in Figure 7.
     The  shapes of the performance curves for the two RBCs
are similar yet the level of nitrification for the two
RBCs are markedly different.  Clearly, the RBC which had
acclimated at pH  8.5, and had a history of elevated
performance, retained its higher performance level in the
short-term and continued to perform  significantly better
than the  biofilm acclimated at pH 7.6.  The RBC response
to short-term changes in pH is relatively constant between
pH 7.9 and pH 9.0 but highly dependent upon the previous
acclimated level  of nitrification for the given RBC biofilm.
Data on  the  alkalinity  levels also have been included in
Figure 7.  The  amount of alkalinity  present at the low
                            780

-------
      12
     0


    1
     S
     ui
     cc
     I  4
     Iw
PH7.6
        5.5    6.0    6.5    7.0    7.5    8.0     8.5    9.0    9.5


                                  pH
     300
     250
     »150
      50
                 pH 7.6
                           pH 8.5
        5.5    6.0     6.5    7.0     7.5    8.0    8.5    9.0   9.5


                                  pH
Figure  7.   The Relative Rates of  Nitrification of RBC Systems

            Acclimated at pH 8.5 and pH 7.6  and Subjected  to

            Short Term pH Changes  and Related  Alkalinity

            Levels
                       781

-------
pH levels demonstrates that even at 20 mg/1 of
significant amounts of nitrification were achieved.  The
response of the lower pH system closely resembles the
data of Borchardt (1) and similarly reveals good nitrifica-
tion at very low alkalinity levels.  This result tends to
reinforce the observation that the pH level is much more
important than the alkalinity level per se in terms of
effect on nitrification.  The amount of time required for
an RBC system to adjust to an altered pH condition is
discussed further in Stratta (41).

Alkaline Chemical Addition Study

     This phase of the research was devoted to the evaluation
of the rates of nitrification of 2-stage RBC systems main-
tained at elevated pH levels through alkaline chemical
addition.  The pH and alkalinity levels within the first
stages of four RBC systems were adjusted upward and
maintained artificially with four  different alkaline
chemicals.  Calcium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, and
sodium hydroxide were used to maintain approximately
pH 8.5, the optimum pH, in the first stage of three
different RBCs.  Sodium bicarbonate was used to maintain
pH 7.5 in the first stage of the fourth RBC.  A fifth
RBC which treated low pH-low alkalinity wastewater
was used as a control.  Data on the operational character-
istics of the five RBC systems are presented in Table 7.
     The overall nitrification capacity of the 2-stage
RBC control system developed more  slowly than did  that
of the higher pH systems.  However, the control RBC and
the alkaline chemical feed RBC systems were operating at
approximately the same level of nitrification performance
after a little more than three weeks of operation.  The
levels of performance for all five systems were very
similar for about the next ten days.  The overall  per-
formance of the control system, operating at the lower
pH level, started to deteriorate after approximately  35
days of operation.
     Based upon the overall nitrification performance
of the five 2-stage RBC systems, a period of relative
equilibrium was established by about Day 38.  The  data
on the relative amounts of total ammonia-nitrogen  removed
by the five RBCs  from Day  38 to Day 75 are presented  in
Table 8.  These data show  that the overall ammonia-nitrogen
removals  for  the  sodium hydroxide, sodium carbonate,  and
                            782

-------
         Table 7.  Pilot 2-Stage Nitrifying RBC
                   Systems' Operating Characteristics
Secondary Clarifier

  Surface Settling Rate (@ 8.6 m3/d) -

  Detention Time (@ 8.6 m3/d)

RBC

  Number of RBCs

  Stages per RBC

  Discs per Stage                    -

  Disc Diameter                      -

  Disc Area - Total

  Rotational Speed

  Peripheral Speed
                   o
  Hydraulic Loading
7.4 m3/d-m2

1.7 hr



5

2

9

0.5m

10.6 m2

13 rpm

0.34 m/sec

81 l/m2-d
SThe hydraulic loading for all five RBC units was nominally
 81 l/m2-d  (2 gal/d-ft2).  The hydraulic loading calculation
 is based upon the assumption that each 2-stage RBC system
 contained  the first two stages of a 4-stage RBC.
                            783

-------
      Table 8.  Relative Rates of Nitrification for
                the RBC Systems of the Alkaline Chemical
                Addition Study

      Alkaline    Ammonia-N Removed    Percent    Percent of
RBC   Chemical     (g NH3-N/m2'd)      Removed     Maximum
1
2
3

4
5
NaOH
NaHCO
Na0CO,
2 3
Ca(OH)2
Control
2.52
2.40
2.54

2.55
2.14
86
82
87

87
73
99
94
100

100
84
aBased upon data from Day 38 to Day 75
calcium hydroxide RBC systems were nearly the same.  The per-
formance level of the sodium bicarbonate RBC system was about
6 percent less than that of the other three high pH systems.
The control RBC, which was operated at the lowest pH con-
ditions, removed about 16 percent less ammonia-nitrogen
than did the three high pH alkaline chemical feed systems.
Table 9 presents the ammonia removal data for each
respective RBC stage.  The data on the amounts of ammonia-
nitrogen removed clearly demonstrate that the greatest
removal occurs at the elevated pH conditions.  The amount
of ammonia removed by the first and second stages of the
three high pH alkaline chemical feed RBC systems was
essentially the same.  The sodium bicarbonate RBC system
had lower pH levels and lower performance in both stages.
The control had the lowest stage pH levels and the poorest
performance for both stages.  Nitrogen balances during
this period for the stages of the five RBC systems are
presented in Table 10.  These nitrogen balances follow the
same pattern previously reported.  The percent recovery
decreased slightly as pH increased.  Again, this lower
                             784

-------
   Table  9.  Relative Rates  of  Nitrification for the
             Stages  of  the RBC  Systems  of  the
             Alkaline Chemical  Addition Study
RBC-Stage
1-1
2-1
3-1
4-1
5-1
1-2
2-2
3-2
4-2
5-2
Alkaline
Chemical pH
NaOH 8.5
NaHC03 7 . 5
Na?CO- 8.4
Ca(OH)2 8.5
Control 7.0
7.9
7.7
8.0
7.9
6.9
Ammonia-N
Removed
(g NH3-N/m2-d)
2.53
2.33
2.55
2.57
2.14
2.50
2.46
2.52
2.54
2.14
Percent
Removed
43
40
44
44
37
77
72
78
78
59
Percent
of
Maximum
98
91
99
. 100
83
98
97
99
100
84
 •Based upon data from Day 38 to Day 75

 Based upon ammonia-nitrogen influent to each RBC stage.,

°Based upon maximum ammonia-nitrogen "removed by calcium.
 hydroxide RBC stages.
                            785

-------
    Table 10.   RBC Nitrogen Balances for the Alkaline
               Chemical Addition Study
RBC-Stage
INFLUENT
1-1
2-1
3-1
4-1
5-1
1-2
2-2
3-2
4-2
5-2
Alkaline Total Nitrogen
Chemical pH mg/1
6.5
NaOH 8.5
NaHC03 7.5
Na2C03 8.4
Ca(OH)2 8.5
Control 7 . 0
7.9
7.7
8.0
7.9
6.9
24.8(24)°
24.4(26)
24.0(24)
23.5(25)
23.7(25)
24.4(25)
22.8(24)
23.0(25)
22.3(25)
22.3(25)
23.8(25)
Percent
Recovery
Stage
-
98
97
95
96
98
93
96
95
94
98
RBC
-
-
-
-
-
-
92
93
90
90
96
SBased upon data from Day 38 to Day 75.

 Total nitrogen is total oxidized nitrogen plus total
 Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN).

CNumber in parenthesis is the number of samples utilized in
 the total nitrogen determinations.

 Nitrogen balances for the stages are based upon stage
 influent nitrogen.
                             786

-------
recovery is attributed to small ammonia losses due to
ammonia stripping and denitrification within the thicker
biofilms associated with the higher pH levels.
     Biofilm which could be sensed by touch had developed
on the discs of all stages within 36 hours.  Within
72 hours from startup, all first stage discs had developed
biofilms which were noticeably heavier than the second
stage biofilms.  The characteristic tan  color associated
with nitrifying biofilms had developed by Day 4 and
was more apparent in the first stage biofilms.  All of the
biofilms were very uniform in texture.  This initial
biofilm growth appeared to be heavier than the biofilms
developed during the previous research phases.. By Day 6,
the trough walls also had developed noticeable amounts of
biofilm.  Although both stage biofilms got heavier and
darker with time, the heavier and darker biofilms were on
the first stage discs.  The first stage biofilms became
brown while those on the second stage discs remained tan
to bronze in color.  By Day 16, discs in all the first
stages had experienced some sloughing while those in the
second stages retained their uniformity.  The loss of
uniformity in the second stages commenced about Day 21.  As
time progressed, the loss of biofilm uniformity was greatest
for the control and the sodium bicarbonate RBC systems.  The
first stages of the calcium hydroxide, sodium carbonate,'
and the sodium hydroxide RBC systems had the heaviest and
most uniform biofilm coatings.  The biofilm uniformity
related directly to the ammonia removal performance levels
of the RBC systems.  The loss of biofilm during the 75-day
period was attributed mainly to hydraulic shear starting
on the surface of the biofilm and progressing inward.
Biofilm sloughing from the bare disc outward did not occur
continuously.  The former method of sloughing appeared to
be associated with relatively low and steady CBOD" loadings,
while the latter form of sloughing appeared to be associated
with relatively high and fluctuating CBOD  loadings.
     The data  for the RBC biofilm concentrations, percent
volatile matter, and percent nitrogen are presented in Table
11.  These data show that the highest biofilm concentrations
were associated with the higher pH levels. Only the
addition of calcium hydroxide resulted in an  increase in
inert matter entrained within both the first  and second
stage biofilms and a significant increase  in  effluent sus-
pended  solids.  Sodium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, and
sodium  bicarbonate additions did not affect the biofilm ,
                             787

-------
Table 11.  Mean Biofilm Concentrations, Percent Volatile
           Matter, and Percent Nitrogen in the RBC Disc
           Biofilm of the Alkaline Chemical Addition Study'
RBC- Alkaline
Stage Chemical
1-1 NaOH
2-1 NaHC03
3-1 Na2C03
4-1 Ca(OH)2
5-1 Control
1-2
2-2
3-2
4-2
5-2
Stage
pH
8.5
7.5
8.4
8.5
7.0
7.9
7.7
8.0
7.9
6.9
Biofilm Volatile Biofilm Nitrogen
mg/cm2 % %
2.45
2.08
2.51
3.03
1.57
0.97
0.84
0.96
1.88
0.87
86
86
87
66
87
89
90
89
70
90
5.7
5.7
7.5
7.0
7.6
5.4
7.6
6.4
6.0
6.8
 Samples taken at weekly intervals from Day 36 to Day 75

DNitrogen percentages are based upon weekly samples from
 Day 23 to Day 75.
volatile content; however, a slight increase in volatile
content in all the second stage biofilms was noted.  The
addition of sodium hydroxide, sodium bicarbonate, and sodium
carbonate caused only a slight increase of from 1 to 3 mg/1
in the suspended solids in the RBC effluents; whereas the
use of calcium hydroxide increased the effluent suspended
                            788

-------
solids by approximately 20 mg/1.  The observed increase in
the calcium hydroxide RBC biofilm inert content as well
as the increase in suspended solids is attributed to the
reaction between the calcium hydroxide and the carbonic acid
or carbon dioxide in the wastewater to form calcium carbonate.
     The populations of ammonia-oxidizing, nitrite-oxidizing,
and heterotrophic bacteria were monitored for both stages
of each RBC system.  Figures 8 and 9 present graphically
the data on the relative geometric mean bacteria populations ,
per unit of disc area and per unit weight of dry volatile
biofilm for the stages of each RBC system from Day 36 to
Day 74.  This time period corresponds to the same period
over which the relative nitrification rates are compared in
Tables 8 and 9.  The populations of all three groups of
bacteria per unit area were greater for the first stages
of the three high pH, high performance systems than for
the first stages of sodium bicarbonate and control RBC
systems.  The first stages of the former were maintained
at pH 8.4 to pH 8.5 while the latter were maintained at
pH 7.5 and 7.0 for the sodium bicarbonate and control RBC
systems, respectively.  In the second stages, where there
was less CBOD, less disc biofilm, and no pH control, the
population differences were not as dramatic.  The ratios
of the populations for the three groups of bacteria for
both stages of each RBC system are presented in Table 12.
     Results of this research effort had indicated through-
out the various phases that heterotrophic activity and
biofilm development were enhanced under elevated pH
conditions.  In order to provide additional information
regarding this observation, approximately 400 cm2 of new
disc material was added to the first stage discs of the
control (pH 7.0), the sodium bicarbonate (pH 7.5), and
the sodium hydroxide (pH 8.5) RBC systems on Day 62.  The
development of biofilm and the establishment of heterotrophic
populations on these discs were monitored through Day 77.
The resulting data are presented in Figures 10 and 11.  The
data demonstrated that both the biofilm and the hetero-
trophic activity developed more rapidly as pH increased from
pH 7.0 to pH 8.5.  During this 15-day test period, the
influent CBOD  (soluble and inhibited) concentration was,
approximately 8 mg/1.  However, significantly greater
amounts of CBOD, if present, may overshadow the more
subtle influence of pH.
                             789

-------
                                  \
                                       O
                                       ow
                                       o
                                       a
                                       Z
                                            o
                                            m
                                            cc
                                       8
                                        M
                                       (0






C5
Z
N
0
X
o
Ul
cc
Z
1
1







o
N
o
X
o
1
<




<
1


<

cc
UJ
1-
o
<
ffl
Q
Z
rrj
CU
CO
cO
rd

0)
CO
CO
d
cO
0)
B
O
•rl
M
4-1
0)
B
0
CU
w
EH
O

O
£
o
K
h-
0
CC
Ul
Ul
I
1
\\,











1
CO >i
}-i cO
cu n

3 0
d 4J
CU
VD
4-1 CO
0
CD CO
4-> PI
CU
CO B
O
>  CO  T3
                                                                                  •H  CO  
 O  rd
P-i  P.  O
    O  pq
 d  n  Pi

 0)  O  CU
S  M  rd
    CU  4J
 O  4-J
•H  CU  4-1
 r-l  W  O
4-1
 cu  id  co
 B  d  cu
 O  cfl  60
 CU      cO
O   "4-1
    60  CO

 i>  TI  a)
•rl  N  ,d
4J  -rl  4-1  >-,
 CD  *xJ     *°d
i-l  -rl  rl  3
 01  X  O 4-1
pi  o  M-I co
                                                                                 oo
                                                                                  cu
                                                                                  CU
zwo/viuaiova  301
                                                     Ul
                                      790

-------
              V)
              U
              CO
              oc





o
N
Q
X
O
1
UJ
E
Z
1







i
N
Q
X
O
1
o



0) '
O
CU
O r

O
S3.

U
X
Q.
O
oc
oc
UJ
1-
Ul
X
1
^









ro
1W
o >>
cO
CO P
4-J

-------
  Table 12.   Ratio of Heterotrophic:Ammonia-Oxidizing:
              Nitrite-Oxidizing Bacteria for the RBC Stages
              of the Alkaline Chemical Addition Study3


               Heterotrophs:Ammonia-Oxidizers:Nitrite-Oxidizers
  RBC                 Stage 1                    Stage 2
NaOH
Na-CO-
2 3
Ca(OH)2
NaHCO
Control
14 :
14 :

12 :
13 :
11 :
16
8.6

7.8
7.5
9.4
: 1
: 1

: 1
: 1
: 1
7.1 :
5.5 :

' 11. :
8.1 :
7.3 :
8.0
4.7

7.9
4.0
6.1
: 1
: 1

: 1
: 1
: 1
 Ratios are based upon the geometric mean of 6 sets of samples
 taken at weekly intervals from Day 36 to Day 74.
     A summary of the alkalinity destruction rates based upon
data obtained from both continuous and batch operations is
presented in Table 13.  Except for the rate observed in the
first stage of the calcium hydroxide RBC, all the alkalinity
destruction rates were in the range of commonly accepted
values.  The unusually low alkalinity destruction rate
observed in the bulk solution of the first stage of the
calcium hydroxide RBC is attributed to the buildup of
calcium carbonate within the biofilm which effectively
neutralized some of the acid generated by the nitrifying
bacteria within the biofilm.  The net result was to reduce
the overall amount of alkalinity destroyed in the bulk
solution during the nitrification, process.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

     This research examined the short and long-term effect
of pH upon the nitrification of wastewater within RBC fixed
film systems.  In the long-term, the rate of nitrification
                           792

-------
                                    /  /'pH7.0
                                                15
Figure 10.  Relative RBC Biofilm Development under pH
            Conditions from pH 7.0 to pH 8.5
                 793

-------
    9-
CM

I
 Ul
 o
 o
  -  a
 O  8
 cc
 fe
 £
 UJ
 X
 o
 Q
    7  -.
                                            pH 7.0
                     6            9
                         DAYS
12
 Figure 11.   Relative RBC Heterotrophic Bacteria Growth
             Under pH Conditions from pH 7.0 to pH 8.5
                  794

-------
Table 13.  RBC Nitrification and Alkalinity Destruction
           During the Alkaline Chemical Addition Study '
RBC -
Stage
1-1
2-1
3-1
4-1
5-1
Alkaline
Chemical
TStaOH
NaHC03
Na2C°3
Ca(OH)2
Control
Alkalinity Destruction
(mg CaC03/mg NH^N)
Continuous Operation3 Batch Operation
6.2
— 6.8
7.4
3.8
7.4 6.6
1-2

2-2

3-2

4-2

5-2
6.1

7.7

7.9

7.0

7.2
aBased upon data for the continuous operation from,Day 38
 to Day 75.
within an RBC fixed film system was dependent upon pH.  The
rate of nitrification increased with increasing pH up to a
maximum at pH 8.5.  Approximately five weeks of operation
were required to clearly observe these differences.  The
response of  a nitrifying RBC system to short-term changes
in pH was relatively constant  from pH 7.0 to pH 8.5.  Below
pH 7.0, the  adverse effect  of  pH becomes more pronounced.
                            795

-------
However, the absolute level of nitrification was dictated
by the biofilm's previous history of nitrification
performance.  RBO systems continued to nitrify at a
relatively high rate after the pH had been reduced suddenly.
The nitrogen balances for the various research phases re-
vealed that the relative amount pf nitrogen recovered for
each RBC system generally was slightly less for the higher ,
pH systems.  This result was attributed to low level ammonia
stripping as well as the loss of nitrate due to denitrifica-
tion within the biofilm.
     There was no significant difference in the performance
of the 2-stage nitrifying RBC systems which received calcium
hydroxide, sodium carbonate and sodium hydroxide.  The
performance levels of the sodium bicarbonate and the control
RBC systems were 6 and 16 percent less, respectively, than
those of the other three systems.  The use of alkaline
chemicals to maintain approximately pH 8.5 in the first
stage of a 2-stage nitrifying RBC resulted in the removal
of approximately 19 percent more ammonia than in the control
RBC system.  Except for the first stage of the RBC receiving
calcium hydroxide for pH adjustment, the range of alkalinity
destruction for all RBC systems in the alkaline chemical
addition study was from 6.2 to 7.9 mg CaCO /mg NBL-N.  This
result was attributed to a neutralization capacity which
developed within the RBC biofilm due to the entrainment of
CaCO,.  The production of significant amounts of inert
material and suspended solids when calcium hydroxide is used,
favors the use of sodium carbonate and sodium hydroxide when
the nitrification is not followed by secondary clarification.
     Higher levels of nitrification for the RBC systems were
associated with greater disc biofilm uniformity.  In all
cases, except for the pH 8.8 RBC of the high pH study,
the higher pH RBC systems maintained greater concentrations
of volatile biofilm per unit of RBC disc area.  The loss
of biofilm from the RBC disc surface did not follow the
traditionally accepted sloughing pattern.  Biofilm did not
slough from the disc surface outward.  The dominant
pattern of biofilm loss was from the biofilm surface inward.
This loss was due to hydraulic shear at the biofilm surface.
The RBC disc biofilm characteristics changed with time.  The
initial biofilm was uniform in texture and tan to bronze in
color.  The biofilm went through an aging process wherein
the biofilm became darker and the texture became less
uniform; the lower the pH, the less uniform the biofilm.
The disc biofilm was affected greatly by low level changes
                           796

-------
in CBOD.  The maximum rates of nitrification for individual
RBC stages were not associated with the maximum biofilm
concentrations on the discs.  Disc biofilm continued to
develop after the individual RBC stages achieved their
maximum rate of nitrification.  The elevated pH RBC biofilms,
which had enhanced nitrification capacities, had higher
nitrifying bacterial populations than the lower pH RBC
biofilms.  The ammonia-oxidizing bacteria generally were
favored over the nitrite-oxidizing bacteria with respect to
increasing pH.  Greater heterotrophic growth and more
rapid biofilm development was observed to occur at elevated
pH levels.        •  '             :
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

     This research was supported by the U. S. Army Medical
Research and Development Command under Contract No. DAMD17-
79-C-9110.                          .      .       '
                           797

-------
10.
11.
               LITERATURE CITED

Borchardt, J. A., et al., Nitrification^of Secondary
Municipal Waste Effluents by Rotating Bio-Discs, USEPA
Grant No. R803407, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1978.
Hewitt, T., Nitrification of a, Secondary Municipal
Effluent Using a Rotating Biological Contactor, Research
Publication No. 71, Ontario Ministry of the Environment,
1978.
Miller, Roy D., et al, Rotating Biological Contactor
Process for Secondary Treatment and Nitrification
Following a Trickling Filter, Technical Report 7805,
U.S. Army Medical Bioengineering Research and Develop-
ment Laboratory, 1979.
O'Shaughnessy, James C. and Blanc, Frederic C., Bio-
logical Nitrification and Denitrification Using Rotating
Biological Contactors, Publication No.  97, Water Resources
Research Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst,
1978.
Hynek, Robert J. and lemura, Hiroshi, "Nitrogen and
Phosphorus Removal with Rotating Biological Contactors,"
Proceedings;  First National  Symposium/Workshop on
Rotating Biological Contactor Technology, Champion,
PA,  1980, pp. 295-324.               ~~
Crawford, Paul M.,'  "Use of Rotating Biological  Contactors
for  Nitrification at the  City of Guelph Water Pollution
Control Plant, Guelph,  Ontario, Canada,"  Proceedings:
First  National Symposium/Workshop  on  Rotating  Biological
Contactor Technology.  Champion, PA, 1980, pp.  1247-1274.
Hitdlebaugh, J.  A.  and  Miller, R.  D.,  "Full-Scale  Rotat-
ing  Biological Contactor  for  Secondary  Treatment and
Nitrification,"  Proceedings;  First National  Symposium/
Workshop  in  Rotating Biological Contactor Technology,
Champion, PA,  1980.
Painter,  H.  A.,  "Microbial Transformations  of  Inorganic
Nitrogen," Proceedings;   Conference  on Nitrogen as a
Wastewater Pollutant,  Copenhagen,  Denmark,  August,  1975.
Painter,  H.  A.,  "A Review of  Literature on  Inorganic
Nitrogen Metabolism,"  Water Research, 4,  1970,  pp.  393-
 450.
USEPA, Process Design Manual  for  Nitrogen Control, 1975.
Watson,  Stanley R., "Part 12  - Gram-Negative Chemo-
 lithotrophic Bacteria," Bergy's Manual of Determinative
 Bacteriology,  8th Edition, 1974,  pp.  450-456.
                           798

-------
12.  Delwiche, C. C. and Finstein, M. S. , "Carbon and
     Energy Sources for the Nitrifying Autotrophic Nitrobacter,'
     Jour. Bact., 90, 1965, pp. 102-107.
13.  McGhee, Mary Frances,'Fundamental Studies of the Nitri-
     fication Process, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Eng-
     ineering, University of Kansas, 1975.
14.  Metcalf and Eddy Inc., Wastewater Engineering:  Treatment,
     Disposal, Reuse, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979.
15.  Haug, Robert T. and McCarty, Perry L.:, "Nitrification
     with Submerged Filters," Jour.' Water Poll. Control Fed.,
     _44, 1972, p. 2086.                           ,   .
16.  Huang, C. S. and Hopson, N. E., "Temperature and pH
     Effect on the Biological Nitrification Process," Paper
     Presented at N. Y. Water Poll. Control Ass'n Winter
     Meeting, N.Y. City, 1974.
17.  Srna, Richard F. 'and Bagley, Anne, "Kinetic Response
     of Perturbed Marine Nitrification Systems," Jour. Water
     Poll. Control Fed. 47, 1975, p. 473.
18.  Hutton, W. C. and LaRocca, S. A., "Biological Treatment
     of Concentrated Ammonia Wastewaters," Jour. Water Poll.
     Control Fed., 47, 1975, p. 989.
19.  Mulbarger, M. C., The Three Sludge System for Nitrogen
     and Phosphate Removal, Advanced Waste Treatment Research
     Laboratory, Office of Research and Monitoring, Environ-
     mental Protection Agency, 1972.
20.  Wild, Harry E., et al., "Factors Affecting Nitrification
     Kinetics," Jour. Water Poll. Control. Fed. 43, 1971,
     p. 1845.
21.  Loveless, J. E. and Painter, H. A., "The Influence of
     Metal Ion Concentrations and pH Value on the Growth of
     a Nitrosomonas  Strain  Isolated from Activated Sludge,"
     Jour. Gen. Microb. , 52, 1968, pp.' 1-14.
22.  Downing, A. L.  and Khowles, G., "Population Dynamics in
     Biological Treatment Plants," Advances in Water Pollu-
     tion Research;  Proceedings of 3rd International Con-
     .ference  in Munich. Germany, Vol. 2., 1966.
23.  Anderson, J. H.,  "Oxidation of. Ammonia by Nitrosomonas,"
     Biochemical Jour., 95,  1965, pp. 688-698.
24.  Anderson, J. H.,  "The Metabolism of Hydroxylamine to
     Nitrite  by Nitrosomonas," Biochemical Jour.,  91, 1964,
     pp.  8-17.
25.  Boon, B. and Laudelot, H., "Kinetics of Nitrite Oxida-
     tion by  Nitrobacter Winogradski," J. Blochem., 85, 1962,
     pp.  440-447.
                           799

-------
26.


27.



28.



29.


30.



31.




32.



 33.


 34.


 35.




 36.


 37.


 38.
Engel, M. S. and Alexander, M. , "Growth and Autotrophic
Metabolism of Nitrosomonas Europaea," Jour. Bact.,76,
1958, pp. 217-222.
Buswell, A. M. , et al., "Laboratory Studies on the
Kinetics of the Growth of Nitrosomonas with Relation to
the Nitrification Phase of the BOD Test, Appl. Microb..
2, 1954, pp. 21-25.
Hoffman, T. and Lee, H., "The  Biochemistry of the
Nitrifying Organisms, Part 4.  The Respiration and
Intermediary Metabolism of Nitrosomonas," Jour, of  Bio-
chem., 54, 1953, pp. 579-583.
MeyerhofT 0., "Untersuchungen  uber den Atmungsvorgany
Nitrifizierenden Bakterien," Pflugers Archges Physiol.,
166,  1917, pp.  240-280.                       _
Olem, Harvey, Rotating-Disc Biological Oxidation ot
Ferrous  Iron in Acid Mine Drainage Treatment, Ph.D.
Thesis,  Department  of  Civil Engineering,  The  Pennsylvania
State University,  1978.
LaMotta, E. J.  and  Hickey, R.  F.,  "Factors  Affecting
Attachment  and  Development of Biological  Films  on  Solid
Media,"  Proceedings:   First National  Symposium/Workshop
on Rotating Biological Contactor  Technology,  Champion,
PA,  1980,  PP.  803-828.
Characklis, W.  G.  and Trulear, M.  G., "Dynamics of
Microbial  Film Processes." Proceedings;   First National
Svr
     I U J_CL-L i. JL -l.lt! J- .i.w*^-'-*'-**—" 3   _    	— cj
_ymposium/Workshop on Rotating Biological Contactor
Technology, Champion, PA, 1980, pp. 365-408.
Heidman, James A., et al., Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phos-
phorus Removal in Staged Nitrification - Denitrification
Treatment, USEPA 670/2-75-052, 1975.
Lue-Ling, Cecil, et al., "Biological Nitrification of
Sludge Supernatant by Rotating Discs," Jour. Water Poll.
Control Fed.,48, 1976, pp. 25-39.
Hitdlebaugh, John A., Phase I. Water Quality Engineering
- .ecial Study No. 32-24-0116-79,  Sewage Treatment Plant
 S£
                                                        24
Evaluation, Summer Conditions, Fort Knox. Kentucky,  14
August and 25-29  September,  1978, U.S. Army  Envir.
Hygiene Agency, 1979.
Alexander, Martin and  Clark  Francis E. ,  Nitrifying
Bacteria," Methods of  Soil Analysis -  Part 2,  C.  A.  Clark
 (ed.), Am. Soc. Agron. , Madison, WI, 1965.
LaBeda, David  P.  and Alexander, Martin,  "Effects  of
            on Nitrification in Soil," Jour.  Environ.
                     523-526.
Rowe, R. , et al. , "Microtechnique  for  Most-Probable-
Number Analysis," Appl. and  Environ. Microb.,  33, 1978,
 SO, and N0?
 Qual.. 7,  1978, pp
                           800

-------
     pp.  625-680.
39.   Ghiorse, William C.  and Alexander, Martin, "Nitrifying
     Populations and the Destruction of Nitrogen Dioxide
     in Soil," Microb. Ecol., 4, 1978, pp. 233-240.
40.   Taylor, C. B., "The Nutritional Requirements of the
     Predominate Bacterial Flora of Soil," Proc. Soc. Appl.
     Bact., 14, 1951, pp. 101-111.
41.   Stratta, James M. and Long, David A., "Nitrification
     Enhancement Through pH Control with Rotating Biological
     Contactors," Final Report, Institute for Research on
     Land and Water Resources, The Pennsylvania State
     University, 1981.
                          801

-------
     SIMULTANEOUS NITRIFICATION AND DENITRIFICATION
           IN A ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR
     Sumio MASUDA, Yoshimasa WATANABE and Masayoshi ISHIGURO

     Department of Civil Engineering, Miyazaki University,
     Miyazaki 880, Japan
INTRODUCTION

     In a Rotating Biological Contactor (RBC) process using a
fixed biological film, oxygen gas seldom penetrates into the
deepest part of the biofilm.  Therefore, denitrifying bacteria
usually exist in the anaerobic and inner portions within the
biofilm of the RBC process.  Denitrifying bacteria existing
in the inner anaerobic portion within the biofilm utilize
organic matter in the waste water as a source of organic .car-
bon.  Nitrite or nitrate nitrogen produced within the aerobic
biofilm is partially converted to gaseous nitrogen (ft2 or N20)
by the denitrifying bacteria.
     This phenomenon of simultaneous nitrification and denit-
rification (referred to as SND) sometimes undoubtedly occurs
in the RBC nitrification process.  The authors have already
observed and reported this phenomenon in RBC pilot plants as
well as in a proto-type RBC system(l,2,3).   However, it has
not yet been verified whether or not gaseous nitrogen is pro-
duced in the biofilm.  Therefore, the authors have carried out
a series of experiments using a completely closed RBC unit to
investigate SND.  The experimental variables were ammonia
loading, organic loading, ammonia concentration and mean resi-
                              802

-------
dence time.  In this paper, the experimental results concern-
ing SND in an RBC are presented and discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

     The experimental apparatus consisted of closed-type reac-
tor and disks made of waterproof veneer boards.  Fig.l shows
the single-stage RBC unit used in this experiment.  The resi-
dence time distribution of water in the reactor without a bio-
film perfectly coincided with that of a single completely mix-
ed-flow reactor.  In order to develope nitrifying bacteria on
the disk surface, artificial waste water (Table.l) containing
ammonia and inorganic carbon was fed into the RBC unit.  Water
temperature and pH were fixed at 30°C and 8.0, respectively.
When the nitrifying biofilm developed, the artificial waste
water containing methanol as a carbon source for the denitri-
fying bacteria was added.  After a week, the outer layer of
the biofilm consisted of heterotrophic bacteria, and a bio-
film consisting of the heterotrophic bacteria layer, a nitri-
fying bacteria layer, and a denitrifying bacteria layer was
formed.
     At this point, an experiment was started to measure the
concentration of inorganic nitrogen (N0.3-K, TTO2-N and NH3-N)
in the effluent and the composition of the gas in the air
phase.  After one Run was completed, the heterotrophic bacte-
ria layer was washed out by water jet.   Then the same proce-^
dure was repeated by adding the artificial waste  water,
depending on the experimental conditions shown in Table.2.
The nitrogen removal rate due to simaltaneous nitrification
and denitrification includes nitrogen utilized for the cell
synthesis of all bacteria concerned in the reaction.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Conposition of the Gas in the Air Phase
     Fig. 2(a), (b), (c) show the relationship between the
amount of gas in the air phase and the elapsed time after, the
vent holes were closed.  Fig. 2(a) shows the relationship bet-
ween the reduction rate of oxygen gas in the air phase and the
concentration of ammonia in the bulk water.  The reduction
rate of oxygen gas was influenced by organic loading.
     In Run 3-1, when the amount of oxygen in the air phase
decreased to 500cc, ammonia appeared in the effulent water.
In this case, it is believed that the oxygen gas was not suf-
ficiently supplied to the nitrifying bacterial film, because
                              803

-------
     Table.  1 composition of
           artificial substrates
Conposition
NH3C1
NaHCO 3
NaCl
MgSOit 7H2O
KHaPOit
Cone, (mg/1)
382
1200
146
123
68
     (When ammonia Cone, is 100 mg/1)
Table. 2  Experimental conditions
Run No
1-1
1-2
1-3
2-1
2-2
2-3
3-1
3-2
3-3
4-1
4-2
4-3
5-1
5-2
6-1
6-2
Flow rate
(cc/min)
5
5
5
12
12
12
24
24
24
48
48
48
10
10
20
20
NH3-N
loading
(g/m2d)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
4
4
Organic
loading
(g/m2d)
3.5
7.0
9.0
4.9
7.3
14.7
6.0
8.0
14.0
5.0
8.3
11.3
8.3
14.0
14.6
26.0
NH3-N Cone.
(mg/1)
100
100
100
50
50
50
25
25
25
12.5
12.5
12.5
100
100
100
100
M R T
(hr)
13.0
13.0
13.0
5.5
5.5
5.5
2.8
2.8
2.8
1.4
1.4
1.4
6.7
6.7
3.3
3.3
                   804

-------
O
ff


1
ft
H-
O
H
(D
cn
(D

r • >
Disk number : 20
Disk diameter : 16 cm
Disk thickness : 0.5 cm.
Disk space : 1.0 cm
Disk area . : 0.82 m2
to
^J
o.
(Thermostat, Heater I











































o
3
CD
hi
<
(D
3
ci-
ts1
O
I-1
, fl>
ft
H-
O
3

O
Hi
13
(D
l-i
H-
3
CD

rt
P>
 d
 3
 H-
 ft
1-3  ffi >-3  HH >
3"  CD  J31  H- H-
tD  ft)  CD iQ  HI
    rt K  C
M
Hi
Mi
                              805

-------
                    Oxygen gas  (  cc  )
  H
  CD
  M
  P>
  rt
  H-
  O
  3
  W
  CC
tr
CD

IT
CD
CD
3
  CD
  P)
  01
   CD
PJ  Oi
Hi  £
ft"  O
(D  ft-
H  H-
   O
rt-  3

CD  l-i
   p)
<  rt
CD  CD
ft
   p)
CD  CC
0)  CD

S3  CD
   en
   CD
 en
 CD
                 -N  (mg/1)  N2 gas  (  cc  )
            Unknown  gas  (cc)
          H
          I-1 1
      ^-, cn N
        CD
      O pi co


      ~lp
        CD 01
                         00
                                      \  ^
                   806

-------
of the reduction in the partial pressure of oxygen.   As the
organic loading increased in Runs 3-2 and.3-3,  the oxygen fed.
to nitrification was not: considered to "be enough even when the
vent holes were opened. . Fig. 2(b) shows the relationship bet-
ween the cumulative amount of nitrogen gas.and elapsed time.
     Fig. 2(c) shows the:relationship between elapsed time and
the cumulative amount of unknown gas, which could be nitrous
oxide (N20).  The cumulative amounts of the total gas (sum of
nitrogen and unknown gas)  were almost equal, but the composi-
tion of the gas was different in each Run.  R.W.Dawson and
K.L.Marphy (U) argued that elemental nitrogen was the end
product of denitrification above .a pH of 7-3, while below a
pH of 7-3 nitrous oxide production increases.  As pH was less
than 7-0 in Run 3-1, it seems that the predominant gas was
nitrous oxide.

Changes in the Water Quality    .;,.,.,
     Fig. 3(a), (b), (c) show the relationship between inorga-
nic nitrogens and elapsed time.  Fig 3(a) shows the changes
in the water quality at an ammonia loadings of 1 g/m^d and an
organic loading of 3-5 g/m^d.  The concentration of nitrate
decreased with the elapsed time. .On the other hand, the rate
of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification increased
with the elapsed time.   It seems oxygen fed into the biofilm
for nitrification became insufficient to accomplish complete
nitrification.  The relationship between the partial pressure
of oxygen in the air phase and the nitrogen removal rate due
to SWD under the same conditions is shown in Fig. U(a).
     Fig. 3(b) shows the relationship at an ammonia loading of
2 g/m^d and an organic loading of 8.3 g/m^d.  The concent-
ration of ammonia in the bulk water increased linearly with
the elapsed time.   Before the experiment began (i.e., during
the time the vent holes were open),  The partial pressure of
oxygen in the gas phase was 21%.  Enough oxygen gas was supp-
lied to the biofilm to accomplish complete nitrification.  As
time elapsed, the nitrogen removal rate decreased, because
there was a shortage of oxygen in the biofilm for nitrifi-
cation.
     Fig. 3(c) shows the same relationship at an ammonia load-
ing of H.O g/m d and an organic loading of lU.6 g/m^d.  The
bulk ammonia concentration increased with the elapsed time,
because the biofilm for organic oxidation became thicker com-
pered with that shown in Fig. 3(b).  When the MRT was long
enough (i.e.   13 hr) and the concentrations of ammonia and
organic matter were low, the nitrogen removal due to SND in-
                                807

-------
H-


U)


(-3




O
                 Cone,   (mg/1),  S  N D  (%)
                 t->
                 o
        ra
       •a
       w to
      •&,.,
        H-
          UI
       D-
       M
                    to   oo
                    O   O
tt^  LTl O^  ~*J  00  ^O  ^^
o  o o  o  o  o  o
(D
tn

P-
3
ft
(D
                Cone,  (mg/1) ,  S N  D  (%)
                        oo
                                  oo
     cr i
       3
       (D
       i-!  cri
                                       o
                                       /
                                       /
                                       o
                                       i
                                       i
                                       o
                                       I
                                       I
                                       o
                                       I
                                         w
                                           CO
       w
       tn
       (D
     O rt
                 O
                    3

                    Ln

                     I
\ ° PH °
Cone, (mg/1) , S N D (%)
I-1 to OJ *^
o o o o o
I—1
Ul CT> ~-J 00 VC -O
o o o o o o
                             808

-------
creased with the elapsed time.  On the other hand, when the
concentrations of ammonia and organic matter were high and
the MRT was rather short, no change could be seen in the nit-
rogen removal rate due to SKD.  The removal rate of nitrogen
due to SKD depended upon ammonia loading, organic loading,
MRT, and the pressure of oxygen in the gas phase.

The Relationship Between a Partial Pressure of .Oxygen and SED
     Fig. if. shows the relationship "between a partial pressure
of oxygen in the gas phase and the nitrgen removal rate due
to SND.  The experimental results shown in Fig. U can be
qualitatively explained by the biofilm models shown in Fig. 5.
The biofilm consists of a heterotrophic bacteria film for
organic oxidation, an autotrophic bacteria film for nitrifi-
cation, and an anaerobic bacteria film for denitrification.
An aerobic biofilm can be considered-to be much thicker than
the biofilm for nitrification or organic oxidation.
     In the case of the attached biofilm shown in Fig. 5(b),
the biofilm for organic oxidation was so thick that both the
organic matter and DO were mostly consumed within it.   Then
the,biofilm dominant for nitrification became very thin.  On
the other hand, in Fig. 5(c), the biofilm for organic oxida-
tion was not so thick, therfore, DO penetrated more deeply
into the biofilm for nitrification.  Therefore, the biofilm
for nitrification became thicker than that, in 5(b).
     Fig. 5(c) shows the case in which the biofilm for organic
oxidation slightly covered the biofilm for nitrification.  In
this case, DO completely penetrated into the biofilm for nit-:
rification.  Fig. Ma) shows the case in which bacteria for
organic oxidation slightly covered the biofilm for nitrifica-
tion at an ammonia loading of 1 g/m^d and an organic loading
of 3-5 g/m^d.  The nitrification rate was sharply reduced at
these loadings of ammonia and organics, when the partial
pressure of oxygen in the. air phase reached less than 10%.
On the other hand, when the partial pressure of oxygen increa-
sed to more than 10%, the nitrification rate became indepen- •
dent of the partial pressure.. However, the nitrogen removal
rate due to SND  .increased with the decrease in the partial
pressure of oxygen in the air phase.  This can be qualitai-
tively explained by the biofilm, model shown in Fig. 5(c).  As
the partial pressure of oxygen in the air phase decreased, a
part of nitrification biofilm, became anaerobic.
     In the case of Fig. U(b)f at an ammonia loading of 2 g/m^
d and an organic loading of 8.3 g/m^d, the biofilm for nitri-
fication became thicker than that in Ma).  At these loadings
                           809

-------
                 The nitrogen  removal rate  due to
                 SND, Nitrification  (»)
    at  _°  H
    rt         o
    p-  PJ  ^-~

    §   -««=  M
    W          "-"
    tr
    CD
    CD
    CD
    3
    P>
    H
    ft
 fu  P-
 3  pj
 O-  M

 rt *0
 5*  H
 (D  CD
    CO
 3  cn
 H-  C
 ft  H
 K  CD
 O
vQ  O
 CD  Hi

    O
 H  X
 CD ^<
 S iQ
 O  CD
 <  3
 P)
 l_i  p.
    3
 K
 P)  ft
 rt  cr
 CD  CD

 DJ iQ
 C  P)
 CD  0)

 ft >O
 o  er
    0)
 cn  c/i
 a  CD
               to
               o
                         to
                         o
                                  03
                                  O
                      O
                      O
    (Jl
    to
    o
13
O
                                                 \
                                                  Q
                    The nitrogen removal rate due to

                    SND, Nitrification  (»)
                         to
                         O
                                       a
                                      —r~
                                  oo
                                  o
                                 —I-
                       o
                       o
                      —r
\
                                             Ul

                                              i
       The  nitrogen removal rate due  to
       SND,  Nitrification (%)
O

to
o
1
l<^
o
1
CTv
O
1
CD
O

c
c

    to
    O
                               •  0
                               •2
                               a
                rt

                p-
                           c
                           3
                                   ft
                                   p-
                                   O
                    810

-------
hfj

H-
W
P-
O
Mi
H-
(0
DO Cone.
\\\\\\m\

V Auto-
\Heterc
X
Bulk
\\vv\\\-\

V
\Heter
\
Bulk
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ %

\
\
\
Bulk :
OC Cone.
>\\u\\\\ \
v
NH3-N
Disk
\\\\\ \\ >

L^A \\V\\\\\\\
Anaerobic biofilm
^trophic \ bacterial film
V \
troXphic \ bacterial film
\ \
\
\Diffusion layer
a o
O 0
liquid
\ V\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ v \ \ t
V—

Biofilm

2
ffi
GO
1
2
\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Disk
Anaerobic biofilm
\ 	 '• 	 :
\ \ Autoterophic
\ \ bacterial film
3tro\phic \bacterial.film
\
\ •
\Diffusion layer
0 0
o n .
liquid
\\\\\\\ \\\\\ \\\ \\

Biofilm

§ . - -
CO
1
^ . .
1A^\\ \\\\\ \\V
Disk
Anaerobic biofilm
\ Autoterophic
\ \ bacterial film
\ \
\^eterbtr\opic bacterial film
V
N^iffusion layer
D O
O O
Liquid
2
ffi
U)
& . '•
Biofilm . ; '
i _
                    811

-------
of ammonia and organic, the nitrification rate became 100%,
when the pressure of oxygen in the air phase equaled 21%.
The nitrification rate decreased sharply because the penetra-
tion depth of oxygen became shallower as the partial pressure
of  oxygen in the air phased decreased.  This is explained by
the biofilm model shown in 5(b).  The biofilm for organic ox-
idation became thicker and the biofilm for nitrification be-
came thinner compared with the biofilm shown in Fig. 5(a), so
that the penetration depth of oxygen became shallower than
that in 5(a).  The partial pressure of oxygen in the air phase
decreased, DO did not penetrate deeply into the biofilm for
nitrification; and, therefore sufficient nitrification did not
occur.
     Fig. U(c) is the case at an ammonia loading of ^.3 g/m^d
and an organic loading of lh.6 g/m^d.  The biofilm attached to
the disks for organic oxidation became considerably, thicker in
comparison with 5(b) or (c), while the biofilm for nitrifica-
tion became very thin.  As a result, the nitrification rate .
equaled HO%, which was an extremly low value.  This experimen-
tal result can be explained by the biofilm model shown in Fig.
5(a).  Both organic carbon and DO were mostly consumed within
the biofilm for organic oxidation, because the high concent-
ration of organic carbon the biofilm for organic oxidation be-
came quite thick.  Therefore, the nitrogen removal rate due to
SND also decreased, because of the amount of nitrate or nit-
rite diffusing to the anaerobic biofilm decreased.
     Fig. 6 shows one of the experimental results obtained in
the batch experiment using heterotrophic bacteria scraped from
the outer biofilm layer.  This  shows that the amount of the
nitrifying bacteria contained in the scraped biofilm can be
neglected,i.e.  only organic oxidation will occuer in the
outer biofilm.
     Fig. 7(Runs 1,2,3) shows the cases in which MRT and orga-
nic loading were changed at a fixed ammonia loading of 1 g/m2d.
Fig. 7(Run l) shows the case in which two organic loadings of
3-5 and 7-0 g/m^d were used in the experiment with a fixed in-
fluent ammonia concentrationof 100 mg/1 and MRT of,13 hrs.
The nitrogen removal due to SND became 100%, when the vent
holes were opened.  It decreased with the elapsed time after
the vent holes were closed.  The nitrogen removal rate due to
SND was sharply reduced, when the partial pressure of oxygen
in the gas phase decreased to less than 10%.   On the other
hand, in the condition in which the partial pressure of oxygen
increased to more than 10%, the nitrogen removal rate due to
SND became independent of the partial pressure of oxygen.
                                   812

-------
CH3OH  ,  NH3-N  ( mg/1
H-
o
i {a u>
2 O o
3 rt
H. p.
0) g
3 H- 0
DJ 3
S _,
fD g
< pj -—
CD 3
H O
Ml-1 (-"
C NJ
CO O °
0
if 3
fD O
OJ fD
S3- g
H- H! °
O 2J
3 rt ,_,
H- I"1
£§ §
H' p
3 co
(D
K)
O

M to
O O UJ ..
po oo g g
i i /rn i i
• o
/
- / ••'
/ /
/ / 0 ^
/ 0 / 0 S
/ a / s t-i
• "• o
/ 0 ^ W
a / £ w
/ 0
- • f'a
1 '
^ o
* t
\ /
/ / .. ..
/ /
/ f oo tn
* ° -o
/ ' Ln o
/ t
/ ; 1
1 sT^
A ' X.
' °«* H

•»
** •> ^
" •» ^
** o
I 1 I i i
O M to U) *» Ol
en — i oo
000
— i 	 1 	 r
o


S!
OJ
rt
fD -,
Hi J
rt
i
"g °?
\-<
S '
C *
t—t
!T> O
(D


U)
0 O
o
O

O




o


    D O  ( mg/1 )
      813

-------
(D  O
& O
C  Hi
(D
   O
rt X
O  ><
   iQ
cn o
Z 3
D
0>  rt
H-
   (1)
   K
 pj  pj
 3  en
 D.  rc

 o  <
 H  (D

 P>  K
 3  C
 H-  IT.
 a
    ft

 o  e

 D.  3?
 H-  H-
 3  rt
IQ  h!
    O

    n>
              The

              SND
     nitrogen removal rate due  to

    ,  Nitrification (*)
                                                      The nitrogen removal  rate due
                                                      SND, Nitrification  (%)
The nitrogen  removal rate due to

SND, Nitrification (%)
                                                       The nitrogen removal rate  due to
                                                       SND,  Nitrification  (%)
         O  ^
                                                          I
                       N>
                                 cn
                    CH3OH  ( mg/1  )


                          •F     01
                   ro
                                           CHsOH ( mg/1


                                               to     jr
         O  ~
         to  o
                                    Hi
                                 £d    tn
                                 C
                                 3 V
                                 •  O -
                                    ro  o
                                 co
                                                                                       CO


                                                                                        I


                                                                                       NJ
                                 814

-------
     In Runs 1-1 and 1-2, it seems that partial oxygen press-
ure of 10$ was enough to acomplish 100$ removal.   The maximum
nitrification rate and SND were obtained,  when the partial
pressure of oxygen became. 3%.   Nitrification was rate-limiting
when the pressure of oxygen became less than 5$-   Where the
partial pressure of oxygen increased to more than 10%, the
diffusion of organic matter to the anaerobic biofilm was rate-
limiting (organic matter limitation).  On the other hand,
when the pressure of oxygen in the air phase decreased to less
than 5$, the diffusion of oxygen to the nitrifying bacterial
film was rate-limiting (nitrification limitation).  The patt-
ern shown in Fig. 7(a), (b), (c) will be referred to as Patt-
ern A in this paper.
     Fig. 7(Run 2) shows the case in which two organic load-
ings of 7.0 and 10 g/m2d were used with fixed conditions of
an ammonia concentration of 50 mg/1 and a MRT of 5-5 hrs.
Run 2-1 also adhered to Pattern A.  When the pressure of oxy-
gen in the gas phase became 10$, organic matter appeared in
the effluent water.  In Run 3-3, organic matter in the efflu-
ent water did not appear until the pressure of oxygen reached
12$, but the nitrogen removal rate due to SND  increased
sharply below a pressure 8$.  SND changed from organic matter
limitation to nitrification limitation at a partial oxygen
pressure of 10$.  Nitrification and SND showed the same de-
creasing pattern, when the partial pressure of, oxygen in the
air phase became less than 10$.  The pattern shows in Fig 7-
(d), (e) will be referred to as pattern B.
     Fig. 7(Run 3) shows the case in which two organic load-
ings of 8.0 and 10 g/m2d were used with a fixed condition of
an ammonia concentration of 25 mg/1 and a MRT of 2.8 hrs.  In
Run 3-1, on condition that the pressure of oxygen in the air
phase reached 20$, SND became organic matter limitation.  On
the other hand, when the partial pressure of oxygen in the
air phase decreased to less than 20$, it became nitrification
limitation.  In Run 3-2, nitrification and SND show the same
decreasing pattern.  The pattern shown in Fig. 7(f) will be
referred to as Pattern C.  As explained above, the patterns
of SND can be classified into three types depending on the
experimental conditions.

The Relationship between the Concentration Ratio of Methanol
to Ammonia and SND
     The relationship between the concentration ratio of meth-
anol to ammonia  (i.e., the C/N ratio) and the nitrogen removal
rate due to SND is shown in Fig 8.  In this experiment, orga-
                              815

-------
100

90
1 *80
O C!
^•Svo
 -a 40
o G
S id
$ 30
C
I 20
S-l
i)
•H 10
C
^ o,
[_ • o
•» W L-**«^B1Bii^^ Q "" 	
^^•^^ (2) o
- O:NH3-N loading 1 g/m2d ^'X^^ ^ ^\
. • :NH3-N loading 2 g/m2d /C NO
/ ^).
O :NH3-N loading 4 g/m2d / x
	 : Nitrification fS
' 	 : SND /

/
	 	 O
/ C)v.
/ *l-*— ,**•» ^Ss^.
S ^ ^x.
/ ^ ^s
"/ ^ \
\ x
3 \
0 n
^ *•" \
	 -•— ""' 	 1 	 1 	 -i 	 i— .. i i i , ,
    5   6
C/N ratio
                               8
                                           10  11
Fig.
8  The nitrogen removal rate due to SND

                       versus C/N ratio
                    816

-------
nic loading ranged from 3-5 to 36 g/m2d.  Organic loadings of
3-5, 7, 9, and 10 g/m2d were used in the experiment with an
ammonia loading of 1 g/m2d.  At these loading rates of ammonia
and organic matter, a nitrification rate equal to 100$ was ob-
tained, even when the C/N ratio was changed from h to 7-  How-
eyer, when the C/N ratio became more -than 7, the nitrification
rate became lower.  At the same loading rate, the nitrogen re-
moval rate due to SND increased significantly with an increase
in the C/N ratio.  The maximum nitrogen removal rate due to
SND was ofbtained at a C/N ratio equal to about 9-  Organic
loadings of 8.3, lU and l8g/m2d were used in the experiment at
an ammonia loading of 2 g/m2d.  The, nitrification rate sharply
decreased.  The nitrogen removal rate due to SND increased
significantly with the increase in the organic loading and the
maximum nitrogen removal rate due .to SND was obtained at C/N
ratio of around 8..  Organic'loadings of iV. 6, 28 and 36 g/m2d
were used in the experiment with a fixed ammonia loading of
k.3 g/m2d.  The nitrification rate decreased with the increase
of C/N ratio. The' nitrogen removal rate due to SND became very
high as the C/N ratio increased and the maximum nitrogen remo-
val rate due to SND was obtained-at a, C/N ratio of 7-
     Fig. 9 and 10 show the relationship between the C/N ratio
and-SND, when sodium formic acid and ethylene glycol were
added as" organic carbons.  A nirtogen removal rate of 20% due
to SND was obtained even at a C/N ratio of zero, because a
landfill leachate  (Haginodai) was used for the raw waste water.
When sodium formic acid was-added as an organic carbon, the.
nitrogen removal rate of 80% due to SND was obtained at a high
C/N ratio of 35-
     These results demonstrate it was difficult for the hete-
rotrophic and anaerobic bacteria to use the 'sodium formic
acid.  On the other hand',  in the case where ethylene glycol
was added   as organic carbon, a nitrogen removal rate o.f 90%
due to SND was obtained at the low C/N  ratio of h.  Based on
the experimental data, the authors belive the effectiveness of
the organic carbon as the  carbon source of SND depends on the
diffusivity and biodegradibility of the organics which  influ-
ence the distributions of  heterotrophic, nitrifying, and de-
nitrifying bacteria concentrations in the biofilm.

Simultaneous Nitrification and Deriitrification in a Proto-type
RBC Plant
     Since Novenber 1976,  a Rotating Biological Contactor has
been treating leachate from the Miyazaki Citiy Haginodai Land-
fill  (5).  The  concentration  of total nitrogen in the effluent
                             817

-------
s
   100
    80
(0
4J

0)
>
o
6
3
  C
  O
  -H
  4J
  60
C
0)
Cn
o
V4
•y
•H
c
•H 40


"M
4J

a 20
-Q	O —




     O: Nitrification

     • : SND

   Ammonia loading   :

   Hydraulic  loading  :

   Water temperature  :
       0
                   10      15
               C/N ratio
                             20
25
30
35
  Fig. 9 The nitrogen  removal  rate due to SND versus the

         elapsed time  (  Sodium formic acid as organic carbon)
o •LUU
4J
0)
3
•o ^80
Q) d?
-P •—
a
"260
r-i -r-{
n3 -P
> (0
O O
a) in 40
i-l -H
C J->
Q) -H
tr> a 20
•P Q
•|H ^4
cw n
"" " O 	 /-\
° ^ -^- 	 	 ~n
S^ ' ^
•
/
/
/ 2
/ Ammonia loading : 1 g/m d
1 Hydraulic loading : 27.5 l/m2d
I Water temperature : 30°C
I
-
/
/
1
K*


i " 1
                   C/N  ratio
                                    10
                                                 15
   Fig. 10  The  nitrogen removal rate due to SND the elapsed

            time (  Ethylene glycol as organic carbon )
                        818

-------
   H-
   ua
H
(D
g
o
cn  t-i
rt  0)
Oi  rt
vQ  fD
fD  cn

H- O
3  Mi

01  W
fD  3

O
tr  MI
H-  O
O  H

>->  H-
fD  3
pj  fi
O  H-
rt  <
O  H-
l-j  Qj
   d
          The nitrogen  removal  rate due to
          SND (  % )
          o
     cn
     rt
     Oi
     cn
     rt
     cn  tr
     rt  <
     Oi  Ui
     cn
     rt
 M
 O
~r
                      NJ
                      o
 Ul
 o
T~
                                  o
                                 ~r
                                           Ul
                                           o
CJl
o
~-J
o
                        fD
                        H
                        PI
                        rt
                     Oi
                     3
                     to
                     Ui
                     OJ
                     to
                    O
                                              oo
                  819

-------
                The  nitrogen removal rate  due

                            to  SND  (  % )
                     to
                                             CTl
o
CD
rt
CD
    to
    CD
    0)
    rt
    CD
    CD
    (D
o  <
(!)  CD
P,  hi
H-  cn
C3  0
iQ  cn

PJ  cn
w  a
    pj
             CTl
             00
     DJ
     rt
     CD
         CD  *»
             (Ti
d    CD
I-!
CD    —
     n
         to
         to
             to
             to
                                  V*,
                        \
                                820

-------
water has constantly been less than 10 mg/1.  In this experi-
ment, the nitrogen removal rate due to SND was obtained from
aerobic RBC.
     Fig. 11 shows the cumulative nitrogen removal rate due to
SND.  The nitrogen removal, rate due to SND increased at higher
temperatures.  SND occurred significantly in the first two
stages but hardly occurred at all in the latter stages.
     Fig. 12 shows the relationship between SND and water temp-
erature, with hydraulic loading as a parameter.  SND became
significant at higher temperatures, and lower hydraulic load-
ings.  Hydraulic loadings of less than 60 to TO 1/m^d should
be used in this plant to obtain a. nitrgen removal rate due to
SND greater than hd% at 20 °C.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
     The phenomenon of SND in a RBC process was confirmed by
measuring nitrogen gas production.  The SND in a RBC was ex-
perimentally studied in terms of. mean residence time, organic
loading, water temperature, and the partial pressure of oxygen
in the air phase.  Most of the conventional biological proce-
sses for nitrogen removal consist of a series of unit pro-^
cesses which perform organic oxidation, nitrification, and de-
nitrification separately.  On the other hand, in the case of
nitrogen removal using the RBC nitrification process, all the
organic oxidation, nitrification, and denitrification could be
accomplished in the same reactor. The obtained results are
summarized as follows:
      1.  In a closed RBC for nitrification, nitrogen gas in-
          creased in the air phase, while oxygen gas decreased.
      2.  The nitrogen removal rate due to SND depended upon
          the MRT, C/N ratio, water temperature, partial pre-
          ssure of oxygen, and ammonia concentration.  When
          the other parameters were fixed, the optimum C/N
          r at io; existed for the maximum nitrogen removal rate
          due to SND.
      3.  The SND patterns were classified into three types
          depending on the experimental conditions.
References
          ISHIGURO, M., WATANABE, Y.  and MASUDA, S. "Advanced
          Wastewater Treatment by Rotating Biological Disk
          Unit (ll)" Journal of Japan Sewage Works Association,
          Vol.lU,No.l52,pp.32-Ul,Jan.(l977)
                            821

-------
MASUDA, S., ISHIGURO, M.  and WATA1ABE, Y., "Nitro-
gen Removal in a Rotating Biological Contactor (l)"
Journal of Japan Sewage Works Association,Vol.l6,
No.l87,pp2U-32,Dec.(1979)
ISHIGURO, M., WATANABE, Y.  and MASUDA, S. , "An
Basic Investigation of Aerobic Denitrification by
Rotating Biological Disk Unit" Presented at the 33rd
Anual Conference of JSCE.,pp213-2lU,Oct.(1978)
Dawson R. N.  and Murphy K. L., "The Temperature
Dependency of Biological Denitrification" Water
Research Pergrame Press.,Vol.6,pp.71-83 (1972)
ISHIGURO, M., WATANABE, Y.  and MASUDA, S., "Treat-
ment of Leachate from Sanitary Landfill by Rotating
Biological Contactor", Environmental Conservation
Engineering,Vol.7,No.6,PP.513-521, June.(1978)
                     822

-------
      DEVITRIFICATION IN A SUBMERGED BIO-DISC SYSTEM
             WITH RAW SEWAGE AS CARBON SOURCE
            Rusten.  Division of Hydraulic & Sanitary
      Engineering, The University of Trondheim, Norway.

      Hall yard 0degaard. Division of Hydraulic & Sanitary
      Engineering, The University of Trondheim, Norway.
INTRODUCTION

        An investigation of denitrification by biofilms has
been performed in two submerged bio-disc units with municipal
sewage as carbon source.  The project is based upon the pro-
cess that the authors presented in the Proceedings of The
First National Symposium on Rotating Biological Contactor
Technology (1).  The flow sheet of the process is shown in
Figure 1.  Nitrate-rich effluent is recycled to the inlet of
an anoxic tank where denitrification takes place with raw
municipal sewage as carbon source.
      In this paper results are presented from a later more
thorough study of the denitrification part, in order to esta-
blish the basic design-criteria for the process.  The goal
was to find the denitrification rate, - temperature dependency,
- pH dependency, - energy consumption and - alkalinity pro-
 duction.

EXPERIMENTAL ARRANGEMENT

     The experiments were carried out in two plexi-glass bio-
disc  units arranged in parallel .  The units called RBC  A
                            823

-------
                   r = rQ  CNr
Figure 1. Proposed process for nitrogen removal in biodisc
          plants.


and RBC  B were identical, each containing one 300 mm diameter
disc with a total biofilm area of 0-15 m2.  The discs were
rotated at 1.7.'5 rev./min., which equals a peripheral  velocity
of 27.5 cm/sec.  The tank volumes were 10.5 litres.  The units
were equipped with double walls.  About 24 hours prior to samp-
ling, the inner walls were removed, scraped, washed and rein-
stalled.  This was done to avoid the wall-growth effects,
that otherwise can be significant in pilot-scale plants.
     Ahead  of each RBC unit a tank for pH and temperature
control was  installed.
     The pH was adjusted by means of an automatic dosing equip-
ment, adding sulfuric acid or sodium hydroxide according to
signals given by pH-electrodes.  The temperature was adjusted
with water from water-baths circulating in copper tubing.  In
addition the RBC units and the tanks for pH and temperature
control were heavily insulated.  The flow sheet of the experi-
mental set-up is shown in Figure 2.
     The raw sewage was presettled before entering the raw
water tanks.  Samples were analysed for influent and effluent
NO  -N, N02-N, alkalinity and.SBOD5.  In addition SCOD
ana DOC were measured during the temperature and pH runs.
Flow rates, temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen concentrati-
ons were observed for each run.  SBOD5 was chosen as the main
parameter for measuring the organic content, since it was be-
lieved to be the parameter that best describes the organic part
available for the denitrifying organisms.
                           824

-------
                        Nitrifier
Nitrified
   water
Raw-
water-
tank
                                       acid    base
                                       acid   base
                                       pH- and  temp.control
                        Deni trif ier
           Figure 2.  Experimental  set-up.
                           825

-------
      Initially both RBC units were run at 15 C and pH 7.  In
the temperature- and pH dependency experiments, temperature and
pH in RBC  A  were varied.  RBC  B  acted as a reference unit at
constant temperature and pH.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Denitrification rates

     Several factors are influencing the denitrification rate,
such as oxygen concentration, pH, temperature, carbon source,
nitrate loading and organic loading.
      Denitrification has to be carried out at anoxic conditions.
It seems as if true anaerobic conditions in the liquid is not
necessary, and that 1-2 mg 02/£ does not influence denitrifica-
tion in biofilms (2,3).  In this experiment the oxygen concen-
trations were usually below 0.4 mg 02/&, and never exceeded
1.0 mg 02/£ .  Thus oxygen is not considered to be a limiting
factor for the denitrification rates found in this study.
      Temperature and pH were held constant.  (15°C and pH 7).
Various proportions and amounts of raw water and nitrified
water were fed to the denitrifiers, in order to cover a broad
range of hydraulic, organic and nitrate loadings.
      When modelling a denitrification system many researchers
use a Monod relation, applying excess methanol and taking nit-
rate as the limiting substrate.  Our experiments showed that
the denitrification rates were very dependent upon the SBOD5
concentration.  Supposing that the RBC units are complete-mix
reactors, the denitrification rates should be a function of
effluent NO -N and SBOD5 concentrations.  Adding a "Monod"
term to the  steady-state removal equation given by Kornegay
and Andrews (4) gives:
                            826

-------
              ,0,-,
                            (sw*-» + si «o«V \KS
                                                         SBOD5
                                                       SBOD5
                                                               i no*-*
                                                                       (1)
where  Q =  hydraulic flow rate (L3/T)
        0 HO--*  '
        1 SBOOe
               = influent and effluent concentration of  NOX-N ,
           "°«""   respectively (M/L1)

      •effluent  concentration of  SBOD,   (M/L3)
      fl= maximum specific growth rate (T  )

       y = yield

       A = area of biological film  (L2)

       X = concentration  of organisms  in the biological film (M/L3)

       d = thickness of the active  biological  layer (L)

                       = saturation coefficients for NOX-N and SBOD

                         respect i ve 1 y (M/LS )
S HOu-N • K S SBOD
                                                      5»
Assuming  that  y, Y,  X and  d are  constants, which  is  only
partly true/   Equation 1 can be  rewritten  to give the deni-
trification rate:
           'S NO.-II  Sl NOv-»
                                       1 SBOD,;
                                    KS S80D5 + Sl SB005
                                                        (2)
       where  R^ ^    = deni trification rate (M/L2T)

              C =  constant  (M/L2T)
      Least square regression  was  used to  find  the equation
that best  described our results  (5).  A lot of functions,
including  the one described  by Equation 2, were tested.
The  results for  the model with best fit and for the  Monod-
type model  are listed  in Table I,
                             827

-------
         Table  I.   Denitrification  rate at  pH 7  and  15°C.
Rate expression , mg/m2h
/ NO,-N \
nNOx-H 1-7<- ^ 335.3 + L^_J 50 SB005
and RHOX-H ^ LKOX-N

Degr. of
freedom
96
94
Resi-
dual
mean
square
4486
13950
r for RKOX-H
obs. versus
RNOx-N pred.
0.9166
0.7216
                                                                       (3)
                                                                       (2)
where  L




       S




       S



       S
NOX-N
        NOX-N load ,  mg/m2h
0 SBOD,
       = influent SBODs concentration  ,  mg/l




       = effluent SBODg concentration  ,  mg/l



H0 _„    = effluent NOX-N concentration  ,  mg/l
                                   828

-------
     Denitrification rates are plotted in Figure 3.  Also
shown are the rates predicted by Equation 3.  Figure 4 and
Figure 5 show  observed and predicted denitrification rates
using "the best fit model" and the Monod-type model, respecti-
vely.
     Using municipal sewage with variations in both composition
and strength, it is not possible to attain steady-state condi-
tions.  Influent SBOD5 concentrations covered a range from 9
to 80 mg/£ and influent NO -N concentrations varied from 5.35
to  20.80 rog/£.  In addition  we used theoretical hydraulic
residence times varying from 0.93 to 3.98 hours, with 1.15
hours as a typical value.  As shown in Figure 4, equation 3
describes reasonably well the observed denitrification rates.
This means that in our RBC reactors the denitrification was
influenced mainly by the influent organic strength (SBOD5)
and the nitrate load.
     The Monod-type model shows considerably more spread in
the denitrification rates (Figure 5).One of the reasons may be
that our system was not steady-state.  Equation 2 gives us the
saturation coefficients, l
-------
                                                           O
                                                      CO
                                                      CO
                                                      -t-J
                                                      c:
                                                      Ci)
                                                      •r-   O
                                                           (1)
                                                      (D
                                                      O
                                                           oo
                                                      Q.
                                                      Q-
                                                      (O
                                                           CD
                                                      -M
                                                      O   CD
                                                               oo
                                                      ra  -Q.   O

                                                        -O   4J
                                                      fO   <1)   tO

                                                      co   n3   cr
                                                      >
                                                                (D

                                                                o
                                                      03  T-  -I-
                                                               T3
                                                           rcf   
                                                                CO
830

-------
Z  800  -
T 600 —
                                     600          800
                                       RKU _, obs. mg NOx-N/m'h
Figure  4.   Observed  versus predicted  denitrification
            rates for the  model with best fit (Equation  3)
                            831

-------
                 200
                                        600          800
                                         R    obs.  mg NO -N/m2h
Figure 5.   Observed versus predicted  denitrification
            rates for the Monod-type model  (Equation 2)
                             832

-------
      The relative denitrification rates in RBC  A  were deter-
 mined according to Equation 4:
                         RD  -  "Rate RBC A"
                        '   -  ~.  "Rate RBC B"

      The Arrhenius relationship is often used to describe
 temperature effects:
                                        (4)
                         RT  =-•  A-e   —       :            (5)

 Equation  5  was  rewritten  to  give  an  Arrhenius  plot:
                         RD=k.e-E/RT
In (RD) = -E-
                                     + In k
(6)
Using least square regression  (Figure 6) we found an energy of
activation   of 39 670 J/mole.  Figure 7 shows the Arrhenius
equation and the observed values for the relative denitrifica-
tion rates.
     Temperature dependencies can also be expressed by:
                                T+10
                                                          (7)
or:
                                  -0
                         'T2 ~ 'T1


Results from this study are listed in Table II.
                                       (8)
                            833

-------
                                                                         o
                                                                         -*'
(aa)
                                                                                             CO
                                                                                             o
                                                                                            4-
                                                                                            •r—
                                                                                             s_
                                                                                             CU
                                                                                            -o


                                                                                             o

                                                                                             CD
                                                                                             s_

                                                                                            4J
                                                                                             fO

                                                                                             
                                                                                            S_
U)

zs
01
                                         834

-------
  o


  ffl
  y


  T  1.80
    1.40
    1.20
    1 .00
    0.80
    0.60
    0.40
    0.20
                                 4771
                             10
                                       15
                                                 J_
                                                            _L
                                                 20         25




                                                     Temperature °C
Figure 7.   The effect of  temperature  on the  rate of

             denitrification.
                            835

-------
              Table  II. Temperature dependency.
  Temp, range °C
                               '10
0
15 - 25
10 - 20
5-15
1.74
1.78
1 .82
1 -057
1 .059
1 .062
      Murphy et.al  (7) reports an activation energy of 69 300
 d/mole_for a submerged RBC, using methanol as carbon source
 Inis gives a greater temperature dependency than we found in
 our study.  Davies and Pretorius (8) observed a great drop in
 ?n lC]B1Sr e^W ]n C' reP°rt1n9 a Qio-value of 1..38 between
 10 and 30°C and a  Q10-value of 13.06 between 5 and 10°C
      Our experiments show  that denitrification with municipal
 sewage as carbon source can be achieved down to 5°C   For de-
 sign,  a  temperature coefficient (e) of 1.06 should be appro-
 priate.                                                  ^K
 pH  dependency
                               •k

     RBC B was kept constant at pH 7, and the relative denitri-
 fication rate at this pH  is put equal to 1.00.   In RBC A the pH
 was increased in increments of 0.5 pH-units up to pH  10.  Then
 the unit was acclimatized at pH 6.5 before a gradual  decrease
 to pH 5.
     Visual observations  showed that the disc started to loose
 excessive amounts of sludge above pH 9 and below pH 6.  When
 the inner walls were taken out for wash, they showed no siqn
 nL9r-Vith/VHu12 and pH 5'  The ^nitrifying organisms were
 not killed at pH 5.  pH 4.9 gave a relative denitrification
 rate of 0.11 (Figure 8).  The following day we observed a
 relative rate of 0.30 at pH 5.2, which is a pretty good reco-
 Vt- 1 y •
     This study demonstrates that the optimum pH for denitri-
fication lies between 7 and 8-5, which is in agreement with
the results reported by Davies and Pretorius (8)
                            836

-------
     1.2
     1.0
 5   0.8
 OJ
 cc
        f
     0.6
     0.4
     0.2
                                              I   	L
                                                     10
                                                      pH
Figure 8.   The effect of pH  on  the rate of denitrification.
                             837

-------
Energy consumption

     The energy needed for denitrification can be expressed
by the substrate consumption ratio, defined as mg organic
matter consumed/mg NO -N removed (9).  Figure 9 shows a plot
of NO -N removed versus  SBOD5 consumed, giving a substrate
consumption ratio of 2.4 mg SBOD5  consumed/mg NO -N removed.
Using the regression equations in TableIII,the  substrate
consumption ratio in our study can also be expressed as 4,6
mg SCOD/mg NO -N or 1.6 mg DOC/mg NO -N.
             X                      A


Table III.Correlation between different organic parameters.
Regression equation
SBOD5
SBODS
» 0,523 SCOD-11.4
= K524 DOC-12.9
Number of
observations
138
133
Corr.
coeff .
0.9611
0-9370
     Narkis, Rebhun and Sheindorf (10) have published results
from suspended culture experiments where different carbon
sources (methanol, sodium acetate and chemically treated raw
sewage) were used.  They concluded that by expressing the or-
ganic matter as SBOD5, a critical value of 2.3 mg SBOD5/mg
NO -N existed when 100% denitrification was to be reached
regardless of what carbon source was used.
     Monteith et.al (9) have investigated different carbon
sources.  They found substrate consumption ratios between 0.7
and 2.6 mg DOC/mg NO -N removed.  Methanol had average values
of 5.41 mg SCOD/mg NOX-N and 1 .17 mg DOC/mg NO -N,  The sub-
strate consumption ratios are influenced by the presence of
dissolved oxygen and the carbon requirements for cell synthesis,
A carbon source with high substrate consumption ratio, would
tend to generate larger volumes of sludge, which is undesir-
able.
     The municipal sewage used in this study has a substrate
consumption ratio well inside the range found for other car-
bon sources (9,10).  When a resirculation system (Figure 1)
is used, influent dissolved oxygen concentration may increase,
giving a slightly higher substrate consumption ratio.  Using
a ratio of 2.4 mg SBOD5/mg NO -N removed will therefore be a
                             X'
                             838

-------
I  40
8  35
m
   25 -
   20 -
   15 _
   10 -
                                                       Y = 2.4058X
                                                       N = 115
                                                      , r = 0.9097
                                                           _L
                                       10      12
                                                    14     16
                                                  mg NOX-N/1 removed
  Figure  9.   Energy consumption for  denitrification,
                                 839

-------
safe assumption when calculating the organic load on the
nitrifier.
                                                 • A •

Alkalinity production

     Denitrification produces alkalinity.  Theoretically 1
mole NOJ-N removed gives 1 mole OH~.  This corresponds to an
increase of 0.0714  meq/mg NOa-N  removed.
     Figure 10 shows the alkalinity production.  It is found
to be 0.0713 ..meq/mg NO -N removed, which is very close to the
theoretical value,  Usifig  a RBC pilot-plant with methanol as
carbon source, Smith and Khettry (11) observed a gain in al-
kalinity of 0.074  meq/mg N03-N  removed (3.7 mg CaC03/mg
NOa-N).


SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
     Denitrification studies have been performed in two sub-
merged bio-disc units, using presettled sewage as carbon
source.
     The conclusions are as follows:

1.  The denitrification rate at 15°C and pH 7 could be de-
    scribed by the equation:
                    ''U
           = 12.72
                      NO -
                    335.:3+L
                           NO _
                             X
                                SQ SBQD , adding the limit
 NO -N
   A

where
              NO -N
                X
            =  denitrification rate, mg/m2-h
     NO -
       A
        =  NOX~
                      load'
            =  influent SBOD5  concentration, mg/SL

2.  For the system shown in Figure 1, denitrification can be
    regarded a 0. order reaction with respect to NO -N concen-
    tration, and a 1. order reaction with respect to"  SBOD5
    concentration.
                             840

-------
                                                                                    4J
                                                                                    o
                                                                                    Z3
                                                                                    -a
                                                                                    o

                                                                                    Q.
                                                                                    fd


                                                                                    S:
                                                                                    cu
uoijDnpojd Ajtuij
                                   841

-------
3.  Temperature dependency  was modelled using an Arrhenius
    equation.  This gave an activation energy of 39670 J/mole,
    corresponding to a temperature coefficient (0) of about 1.06.

4.  Optimum pH lies between 7 and 8-5.

5.  The energy consumption for denitrification has been found
    to be 2-4 mg SBOD5/mg NO -N removed.
                            P\
6.  The alkalinity production has been found to be 0.0713 meq/
    mg NO -N.
         X

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

     The authors wish to thank The Royal Norwegian Council for
Scientific and Industrial Research for financial support.
Also we want to thank G0ril Thorvaldsen for assisting  in  some
of the analytical work.
                             842

-------
LIST OF SYMBOLS
0  =
ys,
Vf  =
d .=
k  =
r  =
A  =
A  =
C  =
DOC
E  =

KS =
 temperature coefficient
 maximum specific growth rate
 thickness of the active biological layer
 constant
 correlation coefficient
 area of biological film
 frequency factor in the Arrhenius equation
 constant      :                    ,
=  dissolved organic carbon
 activation energy
 saturation coefficient
    -N  -  NO -N load
             /\
NOg-N
NO -N
  A
Q  =
R  =

RNO -
 RD  =
 S1  -
 SBOD5
 SCOD
 T   =
 X   =
 Y   =
   =  nitrite nitrogen
   =  nitrate nitrogen
   - Z N02-N + N03-N   •-

 hydraulic  flow  rate
 gas  constant  (8.314 J/mole-°K)
 ft   =  denitrification  rate                   >

 denitrification rate  at temperature T
 relative denitrification rate
 influent substrate  concentration
 effluent substrate  concentration
  =   soluble 5-day biochemical oxygen demand
  =   soluble chemical  oxygen demand (Cr)
 absolute temperature
 concentration of organisms in the biological film
 yield
                               843

-------
  REFERENCES
  1
 8,
10,
11
.  0degaard,  H.,and Rusten, B.,  "Nitrogen Removal  in Rotating
  Biological  Contactors Without the Use of External  Carbon
  Source",  Proceedings of the First National  Symposium on
  Rotating  Biological  Contactor Technology,  Champion,
  Pennsylvania,  Feb.  4-6, 1980, pp.  1301-1317.
.  Christensen, M.H.,  and Harremoes,  P., "Biological  Denitri-
  fication  of Sewage:  A Literature  Review",  Progress of  Water
  Technology, Vol.  8,  No. 4/5,  pp.  509-555,  1977.
.  Cheung, P.S./'Biological  Denitrification  in the Rotatinq-
  Disc  System",  Water  Pollution Control,  Vol.79, No.3
  pp. 395-408,1979.
,  Kornegay,  B.H.,  and  Andrews,  J,F.,  "Kinetics of Fixed-Film
  Biological  Reactors",  Journal  of Water  Pollution Control
  Federation, Vol.40,  No.  11, Part 2, pp. .R 460-R 468,1968.
  Dixon, W.J., and  Brown,  M.B.,  "Biomedical Computer Programs,
  P-SeriesJ977",  Health  Sciences Computing Facility, Depart-
  ment  of Biomathematics,  School of Medicine, University of
  California, Los Angeles,  1977.
  Requa, D.A., and Schroeder, E.D., "Kinetics of Packed-Bed
  Denitrification", Journal of  Water Pollution Control  Feder-
  ation, Vol. 45, No. 8,  pp. 1696-1707, 1973.
  Murphy, K.L., et.al., "Nitrogen Control: Design Consider-
  ations For  Supported Growth Systems", Journal' of Water Pol-
  lution Control  Federation, Vol. 49, pp. 549-557,  1977.
  Davies, T.R., and Pretorius,  W.A., "Denitrification With a
 Bacterial  Disc Unit", Water Research, Vol.9, pp.459-463,
  I Z7 / D •
 Monteith,  H.D., Bridle, T.R.,  and Sutton, P.M.,  "Industrial
 Waste  Carbon Sources For Biological  Denitrification",
 Progress of Water Technology,Vol.12, Toronto,pp.127-141,
 1980.
 Narkis,N., Rebhun,M.,and Sheindorf,Ch.,  "Denitrification
 at Various Carbon to Nitrogen  Ratios", Water Research,
 Vol.13, No.1,  pp.93-98, 1979.
 Smith,A.G., and Khettry,R.K.,  "Nitrification/Denitrifica-
 tion Studies With Rotating Biological  Contactors",Proceed-
 ings of the First National  Symposium on  Rotating Biological
 Contactor  Technology,Champion,Pennsylvania,Feb.4-6,1980,
 pp.1319-1341.
                            844

-------
     OPERATION OF A RETAINED BIOMASS NITRIFICATION SYSTEM FOR
             TREATING AQUACULTURE WATER FOR REUSE
     D._ E. Brune — Department of Agricultural Engineering,
     The Pennsylvania State University, University Park,
     Pennsylvania.

     R.  Piedrahita - Department of Agricultural Engineering,
     University of Calilfornia, Davis, California.      , •;
ABSTRACT
     A series of experimental trials were conducted in which
a variety of polyurethane materials of differing pore size
were evaluated.as a media for nitrifying .filters used in
treating water in a trout hatchery.  These filters were found
to be capable of ammonia oxidation rates ranging from 80-180
mg—N/day/liter of filter volumes.  These rates represent an
order of magnitude increase over removal rates in conventional
rock filters operating at influent ammonia levels at or below
0.5 mg/liter.  These rates were, however, 50 to 100% lower
than the rates observed for a similar filter design operating
under laboratory conditions.  The difference was attributed
to increased heterotropic fouling experienced during the
field operations.  The optimum design for the field unit was
found to be an initial stage of open pore media to accept the
heterotropic loading followed by a second stage of fine pore
material to allow for complete nitrification.  Such filters
may be operated at detention times less than four minutes
achieving well over 90% ammonia removal.
                               845

-------
INTRODUCTION

     In the majority of cases in which low levels of ammonia
or nitrite must be removed from water supply systems, one of
two techniques have been utilized, either biological nitrifi-
cation or breakpoint chlorination.  Gauntlet (1)  compared
biological nitrification to breakpoint chlorination as a means
of treating water for potable supply.  He suggests that the
disadvantages of relatively long contact time required for
chlorination, compounded by interferences from organic compounds
and potential production of dichloramines, trihalomethanes•and
other organochlorine compounds, makes nitrification a more
desirable means of low level ammonia removal from potable water
supply.  Short (2) suggests that the fluidized bed nitrifi-
cation process is cheaper than breakpoint chlorination when the
ammonia levels to be removed exceed 0.2 mg/1.

     Brune and Gunther (3) suggest that biological nitrifi-
cation could, in fact, be used to economically remove low
levels of ammonia from recirculating aquatic animal culture
facilities.  Studies conducted by Gunther et. al (4) indicate
that ammonia levels ranging from 0.05 to 0.50 mg/1 could be
expected in such systems.  The lower limit on these concen-
trations appear to favor breakpoint chlorination.
Unfortunately, however, the dangers of chronic toxicity to
fish from dichloramines or the possibility of acute toxicity
from accidental chlorine overdose makes this an undesirable
system for treating aquaculture reuse water.

     In spite of the reduced rate of biological nitrification
at these low ammonia levels, these sytems can be made to
operate at high efficiency if the lower bacterial growth rate
can be compensated for by carrying much higher levels of total
biomass within the filter units, and at the same time, using
a filter media which permits high water passage rates.  Brune
and Gunther (3) proposed the use  of  a "Retained Biomass Filter"
for such systems.  These filters  consist of submerged, downflow
columns of polyurethane cubes or sheets contained within ridge
cells  of plastic netting.  When tested under laboratory
conditions, such  filters were capable of oxidizing  ammonia  at
rates  of 100-400 mg-N/day/liter of filter volume as  compared
to 10-30 mg-N/day/liter for  conventional aquaculture  filter
des igns.
                             846

-------
     The purpose of this study was to further examine the
behavior of these retained biomass filters.  In particular,
this study was directed at examining the success of three
such filter units under actual field conditions and to select
the appropriate media pore size yielding optimum performance.
METHODS AND MATERIALS                            ,        :

     This  study consisted of  three separate trial runs with a
bank of filter units installed at the University of California
- Davis trout hatchery  previously described (4).  Figure 1
illustrates  the three filter  units and the,containment building.
Figure 2 shows the placement  of the filter units in relation to
the trout  culture and water storage tanks and rapid sand
filters.

     Each  of  the filter units consisted of a plexiglass tube 2
, ft. deep by  1 ft. in diameter, sealed at each end with a
removable  plywood section.  During the runs, the tubes were
filled with  varying types and configurations of polyurethane
material.

     Water exiting from the trout culture tanks would first
pass  through the solids settling tank (with approximately 2
minute detention time)  and then be distributed to each of
the three  filter units. Flow rates to the individual filter
units were controlled by 1/2  inch plastic valves and ranged
from  3-7 liters/minutes giving filter detention times averag-
ing 3-4 minutes.  Each  of the filters units was equipped with
7  sample ports at 2 inch intervals for sampling purposes.
Total pressure drop across the filters was limited to 4 inches.

      In the  first experimental trial, each of the 3 units was
filled with  a different media type consisting of:  1) 1/2 inch
square cubes cut from a dense polyurethane material with pore
size  of 0.1  mm.  The cubes were loosely packed in six two inch
deep  ridge cells fabricated from "conwed" plastic netting
material,  2) 1/2 inch square  cubes in a similar arrangement but
cut from a lighter polyurethane material of approximately 0.15
mm pore size, 3) a similar arrangement except the light poly-
urethane material (0.15 mm) was arranged as uncut circular
sheets 1 inch thick stacked 24 deep.  These filter units were
operated for approximately three months.  Inlet ammonia levels
ranged from  0.25 to 0.40 mg/1 depending on fish loading and
water flow rates.
                              847

-------
      In the second experimental run,  three different  pore  sizes
 were evaluated.   These were a 2.0 ram, 1.3  ram,  and  0.5 mm pore
 size in an open mesh polyurethane material ("Scott" brand
 industrial foam obtained from Wilshire Foam Products, Inc.,
 Carson, California).  In all cases,  the material was  distri-
 buted in the columns as 12 inch uncut circular disks  1 inch
 thick with 2 disks per ridge cell with a total of  24  disks.
 The ridge plastic screen was designed to prevent compaction
 of the filter media during operation.  These filters  were  also
 operated for a period of 3 months with inlet ammonia  levels
 ranging from 0.25 to 0.50 mg/1.

      In the last experimental run, the three filter units were
 operated with a  mixture of pore sizes:   1)  arrangement  A
 consisted of 100% 2 mm pore size,  2)  arrangement B consisted
 of one half 2 mm pore size with one half of  the 0.5 mm pore
 size,  3)  arrangement C consisted of one third  2 mm, one third
 1.3 ram,  and one  third 0.5  mm pore  sizes.   In all cases,  the
 filter media were arranged with largest pore sizes toward the
 top of the column.   This last run  lasted 2 months and ammonia
 concentrated ranged from 0.10 to 0.35 mg/1.

     During each run,  water samples were routinely taken from
 inlet,  outlet, and  across  the columns.  Samples were  taken
 every  3  to 7  days depending on operating conditions.  Filter
 performance was  evaluated  by monitoring ammonia  removal rates
 across  the columns.   Ammonia concentrations were determined by
 the phenolhypochlorite method  of Solorzano (5) with modifi-
 cation of  Liddicoat  et.  al  (6).  Reagent grade hypochlorite
 solution was  used to  make up  the oxidizating solution as out-
 lined  by Solorzano.  Liddicoat  et. al (6) suggested that more
 consistent  reagent  blanks  could be obtained by substituting
 potassium  ferrocyanide as  the  catalyst  in place of  sodium
 nitroprusside.   This modification of  the phenolhypochlorite
 method was used  in  the present  study.

     Water samples were  assayed within one hour of  sampling.
 Preliminary tests showed that  they lose about 1% of their
 ammonia per hour when stored at 18°C.,  No correction factor
was used, however, in the calculation of ammonia concentration.
 Samples were simply assayed as soon as possible. A calibration
 curve was made for determining the ammonia concentration.
The standard deviation of a 25 x 10~6 molar (0.35 mg  NH3-N/1)
ammonia sample was +_ 9% using one centimeter round  curvettes
and a B & L Spec 20 spectrophotometer.  Nitrite was measured
colorimetrically by the method of Strickland and Parsons (7).
                              848

-------
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

     Figure 3 and Table 1 give data previously presented by
Brune and Gunther (3) obtained from a laboratory nitrifying
filter.  Figure 3 shows that these units using a 6 inch down-
flow filter with a 0.15 mm pore size media were capable of
ammonia oxidation rates as high as 250 mg-N/day/liter, and that
these removal rates could be correlated reasonably well to the
influent average ammonia concentration, if separated into
detention time groups.  In contrast, typical field filters used
in aquaculture operation (Kramer, Chin, & Mayo; Table 1)
operated at rates an order of magnitude lower.  In fact, the
previous laboratory results represented removal rates more
closely approaching rates observed by Haug & McCarty (9) in
filters operating at high ammonia input levels.

     In comparison, the removal rates observed f.or the first
series of field units (Figure 4) in this study averaged only
around 40 mg-N/day/liter with total ammonia removal of 60-70%
across the entire length of the column.  The reason for this
lower removal was obvious from visual inspection of the
filters.  The retained bimass filter operates on the princi-
ple that essentially 100% of the accumulated bacterial biomass
is retained within the filter media.  When these bacterial
levels become restrictive to the water flow rate, the filter
bed is washed, thus the biomass levels in the filter are
externally controlled, rather than depending on sloughing
rate, as in the case of conventional rock filters.  Although
the low pore size material permitted high nitrification
rates and high flow rates in the laboratory, this was not
the case in the field operation.  The smaller pore operating
under field conditions rapidly became clogged from hetero-
trophic growth as a result of the low levels of dissolved
organics (~ 10 mg/1) and finely divided particulates present
in the trout water.  As a result, frequent washing of the
filter media was required, drastically reducing the total
nitrifying biomass.  The 0.5-1.3 mm pore was judged in-
appropriate for field use and the run was abandoned after
3 months operation.  However, the data (Figure 3) does give
a good indication of the length of time required for filter
start-up.  As can be seen, approximately two months were
needed to establish a completely nitrifying filter.  The
filters would typically rise to a high rate of nitrifi-.
                               849

-------
cation as the bioraass levels increased, thus requiring washing
of the media and afterward weekly washing of the media with
removal rates stabilizing around 30-50 mg-W/day/liter.

     Figure 5 illustrates the performance of the 3 larger pore
size polyurethane media (see Figure 6 for a media comparison).
These three filters were seen to come up to full performance a
month earlier than the previous run, most likely, a result of
high level of bacteria in the system tanks and piping.  Also,
these filters because of their more open nature, were able to
perform at a higher biomass level giving removal rates around
150 mg-N/day/liter and total ammonia reducations of 70-99%
across the filter depth.  The finer pore filter media showed
greater fluctuations in removal rates since it tended to
develop higher biomass levels followed by a need for more
thorough cleaning.  Figure 7 shows that removal rates could
again be correlated reasonably well with influent ammonia
levels.

     When fully loaded at influent ammonia levels of 0.40 to
0.50 mg/1, these filter media were able to perform at 140-180
rag—N/day/liter.  This rate is again roughly an order of
magnitude higher than previous fixed bed nitrifying filters
used at these low levels.  However, these rates are only 1/2
of the rates observed in the laboratory.  The primary differ-
ence between the laboratory and field performance is again the
fouling of the filter due to the added heterotrophic bacterial
loading.

     In comparing the 3 pore sizes, one can see (Figure 8) that
the 0.5 mm media was much more effective in removing ammonia
requiring only 1/5 of the filter depth to oxidize the majority
of the inlet ammonia, while the 2 mm media required the full
depth to achieve significant removal.  Perhaps, just as import-
ant is the lower level of nitrite reduction in the 2 mm media
(Figure 9).  Although the output level of nitrite from the 2 mm
media was low in relation to the total ammonia and nitrite
oxidized (Figure 10), these levels are still reason for concern
since low levels of nitrite also present a chronic toxicity
problem to fish.
                               850

-------
     Finally, Figures 11, 12, and 13 show data taken from run
three in which the media types were mixed.  Filters B and C
represent the most successful modification.  As seen in
Figure 11, removals ranged from 80 to 120 rag-N/day/liter.
This removal efficiency is at the same level as the previous
runs when consideration is given to the reduced influent
ammonia levels experienced during these trials as a result of ;
lower fish loading during this period (Figure 14).  Figure 12
shows the same correlation between filter performance and
average influent ammonia levels as previously demonstrated.

     The important advantage of the combination of pore sizes
in the filter were:  1) the filter could be maintained at
high flow rates with only a weekly or biweekly washing of the
filter media since the heterotrophic biomass was carried in
the upper, more open pored layers and 2) a high level of nitri-
fication including more complete nitrite removal could be
maintained in the lower, smaller pored media.
                              851

-------
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

     As a result of a series of pilot tests conducted in a
typical trout culturing facility, a more optimum design of
a biological nitrifying filter for treatment of low level
ammonia laden water has been achieved.  The data obtained
in this study indicates that a reasonably high rate of
ammonia and nitrite oxidation (140-180 mg-N/day/liter) can
be achieved with an approximately 3-4 minute detention time
when using a filter design consisting of 6-10 inches of 2
mm open polyurethane followed by 6—10 inches of 0.5 mm
polyurethane filter media.  These filters act as complete
biomass capture systems and require weekly to biweekly solids
removal for optimum performance.

     The initial larger pore section of this filter acts as a
partial nitrifying and complete organic reduction unit, while
the second smaller pore section allows for more complete
nitrification.  The two stage design allows for a sustained
high water passage rate requiring a minimum of filter washing.

     Additional work should be conducted to develop a low cost,
automatic design for controlling the biomass washing of these
filter media in large scale units.  Secondly, a filter media
material is needed that is more resistant to degradation.
After one year of operation all polyurethane media used in
this study had undergone severe degradation, so much so, that
they would have needed replacement had the experiments con-
tinued for a longer period of time.,
                               852

-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     This research was made possible by funds provided by the
University of California - Davis Aquaculture Program.  At the
time of this study D. E. Brune was Assistant Professor of
Agricultural Engineering at TJCD.  R. Piedrahita was a Research
Assistant in Agricultural Engineering at UCD.
                             853

-------
REFERENCES
    Gauntlett, R. B., "Removal of  Ammonia and Nitrate in the
    Treatment of Potable Water," In Biological. Fluidized Bed
    Treatment of Water and Wastewater,  Edited by P. F. Cooper
    and B. Atkinson, Ellis Horwood Limited,  1981.
    Short, C. S., "Removal of Ammonia from River Water,"
    Technical Report, Medmenham, Water  Research Centre, 1975,
    52 pages.
    Brune, D. E., and Gunther, D.  C., "The Design  of a New High
    Rate Nitrification Filter for  Aquaculture Water Reuse,"
    Journal of the World Mariculture Society, In press, 1981
    Edition.
    Gunther, D. C., Brune, D. E.,  and Gall,  G. A.  E., "Ammonia
    Production and Removal in a Trout Rearing Facility,"
    Transactions of the American Society of  Agricultural
    Engineers, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 1376-1380, 1981.
    Solorzano, L., "Determination  of Ammonia in Natural Waters
    by the Phenol Hypochlorite Method," Limmol. Oceanogr.,
    14:799-801, 1969.
    Liddicoat, M. I., Tibbitts, S., and Butler, E. I., "The
    Determination of Ammonia in Sea Water,"  Limmol. Oceanogr.,
    20:131-132, 1975.
    Strickland, J. D. II., and Parsons,  T. R., "A Practical
    Handbook of Sea Water Analysis," Fisheries Research Board
    of Canada, Ottawa., 310 pp., 1972.
    Kramer, C. and Mayo, R. D., "A Study for Developing of
    Fish Hatchery Water Treatment  Systems,"  A report prepared
    for the Walla Walla District Corps  of Engineers, 1972.
    Haug, R. T. and McCarty, P. L., "Nitrification with
    Submerged Filter," Journal WPCF, 44(11):2086-2103, 1972.
                               854

-------
                                                                      10
Inlet
Ammonia
Levels
(Mg/1)
Kramer,
BTF
UF
AUF
DDF
SPDF
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
, 0.45
0.84
0.80
1.7,7
0 .82
Haug &
8.0
8.0
7.7
Forster
1.0
1.0
1.0
Brune &
0.5
0.5
0.5
Loading
Rate
Mg-N/D/L
Chin, & Mayo
37
85
73
90 .
46
McCarty (9)
1536 .
768
370
50
100
200
Gun the r
100
240
500
Removal
Rate
Mg-N/D/L
(8)
-' 11
17
- 25
30
10
1045
595
350
49
92,
170
99
220
450
                                       Detention
                                       Time
                                       (Min.)
                                         7.5
                                        15.0
                                        30.0
                                        28.8
                                        14.0
                                         7.2
                                        11.9
                                         5.1
                                         3.0
 Temp,
  °C
11
17
25
30
10
17.6
14.2
15.9
28.2
25 .8
Variable
Variable
Variable
Variable
Variable
   25°
   25°
   25°
   26
   26
   26
Variable
Variable
Variable
Table 1:  Comparison of Various Filter Performances Under
          Differing Operating Conditions.  (From (3)).
                          855

-------
                                                                                    11
Plywood
housing
Sampling
  ports
 Ridge
 plastic
 netting cell
                                                            Inlet from
                                                            settling tank
- Water level
   2" Plexiglass
  filter unit
                                                             o overflow
                                                              outlet
         Figure 1.   Experimental  filter units.
                                   856

-------
                                                           12
o
              857

-------
AMMONIA  REMOVAL , mg/day/1
       858

-------
              AMMONIA  REMOVAL , mg-N/day/1
t
CD
4>-
O
0.
H-
O
<3
P
l-h
O
i-i
(D

l-h
H-
8
CO
                                               co
                                               §'
       8
                         859

-------
                                  Pore Size
                                  ••••••2.0mm
                                  "™~* 1.3mm
                                  —-0.5mm
  10  20  30  40  50  60  70
           TIME ,  Days

Figure 5.  Ammonia removal in large pore filters,
                860

-------
                                                     » *"    J Aw •"* f *^ ^-V #   ^
                                                     ^^, A >M  W,  «. «i*r ^  •**• t

                                                     *"***&*&*'.
    t-!
    CD
 Ml <
 H- P
 H- H
 rt H-

•8 §
 (t>  13
 PL o
 H- M
 p>  <<
 •  rt
    g"
 X
    0)
 (a
 o  g
 rt  P
 C  rt
 P  CD
 K  P
 P- I-1
 N  CD
 (D
 ^ C
 •   cn
    8.

    Hi
    O
                                                861

-------
                 AMMONIA  REMOVAL, mg/day/1


                      g    8   8   $   $   ?   §
n>
^
Q
       P-

                                            bl O* 
-------
                           2.0mm
       FILTER DEPTH, Inches

Figure 8.   Drop in ammonia concentration
          across three different pore
          size filters.
            863

-------
o>
| .05-
2 .04-
W x-v-,
o .03-
o
0 .02-
LU
h*
S
2 .01-
t
2 i



2.0mm
.•**^^^ ^^w.
.^ X
// 1.3mm >.
•*» A


__
^^s*~ ^***+^^ 0.5mm


5 10 15
     FILTER  DEPTH , Inches

Figure 9.  Levels of nitrite across
          three different pore size
          filters.
             864

-------
0.50-n
                           PORE  SIZE
.......
                                  2.0 mm
                                — 1.3mm
                                — 0.5mm
          T	—T	1	T—	F*	T
          10   20  30  40  50  60  70
                    TIME  , Days
          Figure 10.  Levels of outlet nitrite
                    from large pore filters.
                  865

-------
                 AMMONIA REMOVAL, mg/doy/1
           §   8   o
C
n
(D
O
0
§
(U
0
8-
   f5S
S.  o
3  °
a  w  £
tf-     O
Ml

H-
rt
n>
     8-
      0>
      o
                                 8   $
                        866

-------
200-i

180-

160-

140-
100-
 80-
60-

40-

20-
           Mixed Medio
           ®  Unit A
           ®  Unit B
           ®  Unit C

           Average detention time
                3.6  minutes
                          0.2         0.3
          AVERAGE  INLET  NH3-N ,  mg/1
                                                 0.4
        Figure 12.   Relationship between ammonia removal
                   and  inlet levels  in mixed media  filters.
                        867

-------
              NITRITE  CONCENTRATION, mg/1

              P   2   P   P    O    O
                   P   Q   O    Li    L.

                   I   9   I    8    8
t
ro
u>
P
rt
(0
3
H-
rt
H
H-
rt
H-
0)

O
O
3
O
(D
3
rt

fu
rt

s-
3
§
8,
I?
H-
H
rt

8
en
•) (5)

:  I
                                  c c c


                                  O CD J>
                                           X
                                           CD
                                           Q.
                                           Q.
                                           o*
                       868

-------
                INLET
          AMMONIA CONCENTRATION , mg/1
OQ
d

to

M
.£>



H


(D
rt

£B


O

M
cn

P4




OQ

rt

(D

rt
fD
n>
rt
i-i
t-i

§
CO
                 869

-------
                Nitrified Secondary Treatment
          Effluent by Plastic-Media Trickling Filter
                Jiumrn Min Huang and Yeun C. Wu
               Department of Civil Engineering
               Polytechnic Institute of New York
                   & University of Pittsburgh
                        Alan Molof
               Department of Civil Engineering
              Polytechnic Institute of New York
INTRODUCTION
     Ammonia nitrogen plays a vital role in the synthesis of
microorganisms in the secondary treatment of wastewater.
Generally, there is abundant ammonia nitrogen present in muni-
cipal effluent streams.  Through the process of nitrification,
this excess nitrogen in the wastewater treatment plant effluent
consumes the dissolved oxygen in the receiving water.  This,
along with the ammonia toxicity, creates unhealthy conditions
for aquatic life.
     Nitrification is a two-step biological process in which
ammonia nitrogen is oxidized to nitrite and further to nitrate
as shown below:
         NH,
Step one
Nitrosomonas
NO,
 Step two   ..
~ }           -
Nitrobacter
Nitrosomonas and nitrobacter are commonly the most responsible
for either of the two oxidation steps.  These organisms are
classified as autotrophic or chemolithotrophic because they
                                870

-------
obtain carbon source from dissolved carbonate and use oxidiza-
ble substrate as their source of energy for growth and metabol-
ism. The two steps for the nitrification transformation can be
written as follows:
      NHJ-+ 1.5 02 + 2 HC03
                              Step one
 2 N02  +2
            N0~ + 0.5 02   Step two  -> 2 N03
                                                  (1)'
                                                  •(2)
In addition, the overall reaction is
          NHj + 2 02 + 2 HC03
N03 + 2 H2C03
     Biological nitrification of a secondary effluent can be
accomplished by both suspended- and fixed-growth processes
(1-3).  However, due to many advantages associated with the
latter process, more studies have been made recently in the
fixed-growth systems (4-7). Also, the use of light weight
synthetic media allows the fixed-film biological filter
to be constructed much deep thus minimizing space requirement
and maximizing loading capacities.  The synthetic media
has an increased specific surface area for greater biomass
attachement that results in a lower solids production in
the plant effluent.
     The main objective of this study is to investigate the
feasibility of using plastic-media trickling filter for the
removal of nitrogen from the effluent of activated sludge
wastewater treatment plant.  The efficiency of the trickling
filter plant was evaluated under different nitrogen loading
rates.  And the relationship between alkalinity destruction
and nitrogen removal was also studied.  The settling charact-
                               871

-------
eristics of the nitrified sludge was determined by sludge
volume index (SVI).

EXPERTEMNTAL PROCEDURE
    Two laboratory-scale trickling filter towers were construct-
ed in the Environmental Engineering Research Center at the Univ-
ersity of Pittsburgh.  The filters were 6" squares and 8' long.
A synthetic plastic media manufactured by Munters was employed
for the study.   The media model is Munters Biodek 19060, which
has a surface area 140 m2/m3 or 44 ft2/ft3 and a void ratio of
greater than 95%.  Plant specifications and media structure
are shown in Table 1.
     The influent for twin towers, connected in series, was
stored in a 250 gallons tank.  The influent feed solution was
taken from the effluent of an existing activated sludge pilot plant
located in the same laboratory.  The desired amounts of ammonia
nitrogen (NH.C1)  and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCOg) were added
to the solution and mixed in the feed tank.
     The wastewater was pumped to the plastic-media trickling
filters by two variable speed pumps.  The wastewater was first
fed to the top of filter No.l and the effluent was discharged to
clarifier No. 1.  And then a second pump taken the feed from
the above mentioned clarifier, continuously pumped the waste-
water up to the top of filter No. 2 where it traveled down
and into clarifier No. 2.
     Effluent samples were collected twice each week.  Sampling
ports were located 2 ft, 4 ft, 5.5 ft, and 7 ft from the top
of filter media in each tower.  Controlling parameters included
NHo-N, N09, NOV alkalinity, pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), suspend-
ed solidsf BOD; and SVI.  NH3-N, N02, and NOs were measured by an
Orion Digital lonalyzer.  Other parameters such as TSS and VSS,
alkalinity, BOD were performed in accordance with "Standard
Method" (8).  The pH and DO were measured by Orion pH meter and
YSI DO meter.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

     1.  Influent Wastewater Characteristics.  Table 2 is a list
of influent feed conditions proceeding into first filter.  The
range of flow rates tested varied from 45 to 115 gallons per day.
The highest NHs-N concentration was 109.4 mg/1 while the lowest
concentration was 43,6 mg/1.  The influent nitrite and nitrate
concentration ranged from 3.2 to 12.4 mg/1 and the alkalinity
fluctutated between 315,7 mg/1 and 750 mg/1 as CaCOs.  The pH
range was small and it varied between 7,7 and 8.3.  The dissolved
                               872

-------
      Table 1. Trickling Filter Plant Specifications
Parameters
                                 Filters  #1  and #2
 (A).  Reactor Dimension:
      Size
      Height
      Vol ume
       Gross
       Media
 (B).  Filter Media:
      Type
      Surface Area
      Void  Ratio
 (C).  Media  Configuration:
6" x 6"
   7'

 2.0 ft3
 1.75 ft3
Hunters Biodek 19060
44 ft2/ft3 (140. m2/m3)
> 9555
                         873

-------
                     Flow /"
                 Distribution
                    Plate
Effluen
sA
                         Figure 1.  Trickling  Filter Pilot Plant
                                   For Nitrification Study
                                              874

-------
           Table 2.  Influent  Feed Conditions
Flow Rate Influent Concentration, ma/1 .-•'••
Gal. /Day
78.6
49.3
102.8
49.4
98.5
78.8
99.6
78.8
45.0
49.9
98.0
115.0
57.5
57.7
: r::-:3-N NC2+N03 DO
74.18
109.40 •
.50.1
79.3
. 39.3
45.5
26.0
28.4
54.1
43.4
19.5
15.2
13.6
12.6
6.6
6.1
7.3
12.4
9,6 '
6.4
9.1
8.1
11.0
6.6
9.2
5.1
7.2
3.2
"4.8
4.7
6.1
5.0
8.8
4.5
7.7
5.3
5.4
4.8
8.9
• 4.8
4.9
5.2
Alkalinity pH Temperature, °C
as CaCOa
431.0
750.0 ,
368.0
650.5
315.7
460.0
323.2
373,6
536.9
457.0
311.2
366.4
425.4
366.4
8.2
8.0
7.8
7.9
7.7
8.0
7.7
, 8.1
7.9
8.2
7.7
8.3
7.9
8.2
24.0
: 20..0
24.0
21.5
22.0
23.0
22.0
23.1 '
20.6
22.0
22.0
24.4
23.5
2.6.0 -
* BOD <  25 mg/1
                                  875

-------
oxygen content of the feed was within the level of 4.7 to 8.9 mg/1
The pilot plant was operated at room temperature, 20.6 to 26.0°C.
      2.  System Start-Up.  At the beginning of the study,
the trickling filters were operated separately at the flow
rate of 42.6 gallons per day and 56.4 gallons per day.  Figure
2 shows the NHo-N and N02+ N03 concentrations at different
filter depth with respect to days of operation for each filter.
     From the figure it can be seen that it required 60 days
for one filter and 67 days for the other filter to remove
the NHo-N down to approximately 1.6 mg/1 at a filter depth of
6 feet?  Also, from the same figure, it is apparent that the
NHo-N concentration decreases as the filter depth and start-
up days increase.  In addition, Figure 2 further shows that
nitrification increases with filter depth and start-up time
because there is an increase in N02 + N03 concentration.
     As already pointed out, the start-up time for obtaining  a
steady-state operational condition in trickling filter nitri-
fication process was long with no seed organisms used.   In order
to shorten the start-up time, flow recirculation through the
filter with seed organisms should be employed.

     3. Trickling Filter Plant Performance.  The ammonia nitrogen
conversion to nitrite and nitrate as a function of filter depth
under different nitrogen loading conditions are shown in Figures
3, 4, and 5.  It is apparent from these figures that as the
filter depth increases, the NHs-N concentration decreases with
increasing the production of N02 and NO, in filter 1.  The same
relationship continuously existed in fitter 2 until the net
accumulation of nttrite became decreased.  As a result, the
rate of nitrate arose sharply but the removal of NH3-N became
insignificant.
     The nitrogen loadings presently empolyed for the operation
of both filters 1 and 2 are shown in tables 3 and 4.  The
nitrogen loading was calculated based on the  kg NH3-N used per
tower surface area In m2 per day (kg NH,-N/mz-day).  According-
to tables 3 and 4, the nitrogen loading varied from 0.120 kg/m
-day to 0.959 kq/m2-day in filter 1 operation and varied from
0.016 kg/m2-day to 0.530 kg/m2-day in filter  2 operation.  Since
filter 2 treated the effluent of filter 1, the nitrogen loadings
were lower.
     The reduction of ammonia nitrogen in the plastic-media
trickling filter system is certainly dependent upon the rate of
nitrogen loading.  Trickling filter  1 showed  NH,-N removal up
to 86.4% for a nitrogen loading of 0.120 kg/m2-8ay.  As the
loading was increased to 0.959 kg/m2-day, the %  NH3-N was red-
                              876

-------
Flou •= 56.4  gallons/dav
                   5   60
                  Height, ft
       Figure 2.  Trickling Filter Start-up
156
                             877

-------
                                                   100
                       Filter *2

                               fV- Cumulative
         4560         2

               Height,  ft
5 .  6
Figure 3.    Ammonia  Conversion as a Function
            of Nitrogen  Loading at 0.281 and
            0.395  ko/m2-day,  respectively.
                    878

-------
                560
                  Height, ft
                                         45   6
Figure 4.   Nitrogen Conversion as a Function
           of Nitrogen Loading at 0.421 and
        .  '0.632  kg/m2-day, respectively.
                  879

-------
Figure 5.   Anmonia  Conversion as a Function
           of Nitrogen  Loading at 0.631 and
           0.875 kg/m2-day, respectively.
                     880

-------
Table 3.   Trickling Filter 1 Effluent
          Characteristics
Nitrogen
Loading
Kg/m2-day
0.959
0.875
0.837
0.630
0.632
0.578
0.421
0.361
0.395
0.349
0.311
0.280
0.129
0.120
Effluent
,NH3-N
rag/1
41.4
62.0
24.7
29.3
15.0
15.0
7.0
5.8
14.0
7.7
3.3
2.5
1.8
1.7
Removal
44.2
43.3
50.6
63.0
62.0
67.0
73.1
79.3
74.1
82.2
82.9
83. 1
86.7
86.4
+ N03
41.75
58.18
32.93
63.12
25.43
31.02
20.65
32,23
55.18
27.55
16.23
16.37
15.6
13.02
PH
8.0
7.8
7.5
7.8
7.7
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.7
8.0
7.7
8.2
7.7
8.1
DO
mg/1
4.1
3.1
6.2
4.6
7.2
4.0
7.3
4.7
•4.3
4.2
7.2
4.6
4.5
4.6
TSS
7
10
9
6.6
11,3
3.6
5.3
4.6
13.7
3.0
20.0
2.7
3.3
6.2
VSS
mg/1
4
9
7
4.9
8.6
2.3
3.0
2.7
7.0
2.5
11.0
2.2
2.6
2.5
              881

-------
Table 4.   Trickling Filter 2 Effluent
          Characteristics
Nitrogen
Loading
kg/m -day
0.530
0.495
0.413
0.240
0.232
0.191
0.113
0.074
0.102
0.060
0.053
0.047
0.017
0.016
Effluent
NH3-N
mg/1
16.9
21.5
8.43
2.72
3.45
2.00
0.33
0.45
1.48
0.36
0.12
0.02
0.02
0.02
% NH3-N
Re"oval
59.1
65.3
65.9
82.0
83.2
86.6
95.2
92.3.
89.4
95.3
96.2
98.8
98.8
98.8
N02
+ NO,
mg/r
59.2
84.9
36.4
86.0
33.0
37.5
25.9
35.5
57.1
38.6
23.7
24.5
17.8
15.5
pH
8.0
7.7
7.6
7.6
7.7
8.0
7.7
8.2
7.8
8.2
7.7
8.5
8.1
8.2
DO
mg/1
4.4
3.3
6.8
5.3
7.5
4.3
7.7
4.9
4.9
4.4
7.4
4.9
4,8
4.6
TSS VSS
ing/1
4.0
11.0
8.0
14.3
21.3
3.8
9.0
1.6
7.3
2.5
6.0
2.0
2.0
4.0
3.0
10.0
6.5
8.3
13.3
2.3
4.6
1.0
6.7
2.0
3.0
2.0
1.8
1.5
                882

-------
uced to 44.2.  Trickling filter 2 achieved a higher nitrogen
removal efficiency, ranging from 59.1% to 98.8%, due to a lower
loading condition.  According to the present study, two 6-foot
filters connected in series are capable of obtaining an effluent
NH3-N Concentration less,than 1.0 mg/1 at a loading of 0.42 kg/
m2-day for first filter and of 0.113 kg/m2-day for second filter.
It is clear that the effluent NHs-N remaining depends not only
the nitrogen loading but also the initial concentration of NH3~
N in the wastewater.  It is expected that the effluent NH3-N
concentration will be higher if the influent concentration of
NH3-N and the rate of nitrogen loading are higher.
     Table 5 summarizes the nitrification data obtained from
the present study and the other investigations using rotating
biological contactors.  The nitrogen loading used in this case
was calculated based on pounds of NHo-N applied per plastic media
surface area in ft2 per day (Ib NH^-N applied/1000 ft2-day).
Table 5 shows that the nitrification of secondary treatment
effluent by trickling filter is comparable to or even better
than that achieved by rotating biological contactors.
     By comparing  the pH and DO of  the influent and  effluent
of  filter 1, it  is observed that  both of  these  parameters  fell
slightly as  the wastewater traveled through  the filter.  These
results are  normal  because of  nitrogen oxidation  and destruct-
ion of bicarbonate alkalinity.  The effect  of nitrogen  loading
on  alkalinity destruction will  be discussed  later in detail.
Recovery of  pH  and DO was obatined  after  the wastewater pass-
ing through  filter 2.   The pH  increase was  very slight  while
the DO increase  was more substantial.   It seems obvious that
the amount  of oxygen  dissolved in the wastewater  is  greater
than  the quanity required  for  biological  nitrification  in  fil-
er 2.  No oxygen deficiency  was found during the  entire period
of this  study.   Both  effluents of filters 1 and 2 contained
small  concentrations  of total  and volatile suspended solids in
accordance  with tables  3 and 4.
      The effect of filter  height  on the  plant performance  under
various  nitrogen loading conditions is  shown in Figure  6.   It
can be seen  in  Figure  6 that for all  loading conditions present-
ly investigated the percentage of NhU-N  removal increases  as
the filter  depth also  increases.   But such increase was reduced
markedly when  the nitrogen  loading  exceeded 0.8 kg/nr-day  in
trickling  filter 1.   The results  for  trickling  filter 2 are
opposite.   At  the low nitrogen loading  condition, the % removal
of NH,-N from  the filter 1 effluent was  only slightly affected
 by the filter  depth measured at 2,  4, 5, and 6  feet below the
 top of plastic media.  The  influence of filter depth on trickling
 filter 2 performance becomes profoundly after the nitrogen load
 exceeding  0.5  kg/m2-day.
                                  883

-------
Table 5.  Nitrification of Secondary Effluent
          By Trickling Filter and Rotating
          Biological Contactors
Nitrogen
Ib NH3-N

o
1000 ft*
Loading Rate
Applied


- day
Trickling Rotating
Filter Biological
/ *-* \
(a)
0.067
0.072
0.176
0.185
0.198
0.206
0.225
0.241
0.332
0.362
0.364
0.482
0.504






(br

0.20



0.40
0.50
0.60
0.61
0.76
0.78

1.10
1.29




Contactor
( ^(10)

0.08
0.13
0.18
0.21
0.22


0.42
0.48



0.83



Ammonia Nitrogen


Reduction
(*)


Trie! king Rotating
Filter Biological Contactor
(a)
99.9
99.8
99.3
98.9
98.9
97.2
98.4
98.7
95.6
83.2
93.1
80.3
77.1







(b)

95.0



90.0
80.0
90.0
65.0
13.0
73.0

25.0
35.0
(c)

94.4
70.3
83.1
88.3
91.7


76.8 :
83.1



70.3


                        884

-------
                            Removal of  Influent  NH--N
   .—'
rf   &

ST8*:?.
    T3

  fD CD
  3 fD
  O r+
  < X
  a> n
  —• m


  rt z

  O r*

  ^3
  -*iiQ


  ss
                     % Removal of  NH,-N  Remaining  in
                     the Effluent  of  Filter  #1
                                   885

-------
     4. Alkalinity Requirement.  The pound of alkalinity
destoryed per pound of ammonia nitrogen oxidized to nitrate
normally equals to 7.2 (11).  A plot of pound of alkalinity
consumed per pound of NH3-N removed is shown in Figure 7.
It is clearly shown in Figure 7 that the alkalinity require-
ment for trickling filters 1 and 2 is different.  And the
normal ratio of 7.2 was not observed.
    Trickling filter 1 shows a ratio of approximately 6.7
up to a nitrogen loading of 0.50 kg/m2-day.  As the loading
exceeded the above mentioned value, the pound of alkalinity
utilized per pound of ammonia nitrogen oxidized became smaller.
For instance, at the nitrogen loading of 0.959 kg/m2-day,
the ratio is 4.6  Trickling filter 2 shows the same resulting
curve as filter 1.  According to Figure 7, the ratio varied
from 7.8 to 4.25 as the nitrogen loading increased from 0.016
kg/nr-day to 0.53 kg/m2-day.  The ratio decrease became so
apparent when the nitrogen loading exceeding 0.25 kg/m2-day.
     It also appeared that the effect of nitrogen loading on
alkalinity demand for nitrification in the trickling filter
system was significant, in particular, when the nitrogen Ipad
exceeding 0,5 and 0.25 kg/m^-day in the first and second filter,
respectively.  Although the organic content in the wastewater
was low (<25 mg/1 as BOD), ammonia nitrogen was utilized by both
nitrifying bacteria and heterotrophic organisms due to the fast
feed rate.  This is the reason to explain why the alkalinity
demand per unit amount of nitrogen consumed was low at high nitro^
gen loading condition.
   5. Sludge Settling Characteristics.  Nitrifying organisms
produced from the-fixed-film trickling filter system have an
excellent property in settling.1  Although the SVI was high
between 199 and 319 during the strat-up period, its value
varied only slightly around 110 at all times after the system
reached the steady-state condition.  Normal sludge floe  is
shown in Figure 8.  The size of the floe was large and it
can be separated from liquid phase quickly.  However, regular
microscopic examination of filter sludge occasionally found
that long-length filamentous microorganisms existed.  It  is
believed that these filaments are transferred from the effluent
of the activated sludge plant instead of being  developed  from
the trickling filters.  The morphological structure of the
long-length filaments is shown in Figure 9.
                              886

-------
              Filter
            -  9
•8
    S.

    i
                    •«	
-------
Figure 8.  Normal Trickling Filter Sludge
           (200 X)
                    888

-------
Figure 9.  Filamentous Growth in Trickling
           Filter Sludge (200 X)
                         889

-------
CONCLUSIONS

     Biological nitrification of secondary effluent by a
two-stage trickling filter was throughly investigated under
the optimum pH and temperature conditions.  It was found
that the efficiency of the trickling filter plant was a
function of influent nitrogen concentration, nitrogen loading,
and filter depth.  The quantity of ammonia nitrogen removed
was higher tn filter 1 than filter 2.  The continuously
oxidized ammonia nitrogen resulted in the accumulation of
nitrite and nitrate in the system, however, the production
of nitrite started to decrease with increasing the nitrate
when ammonia nitrogen remaining in the wastewater approached
to its lowest level.  More than 93% of ammonia nitrogen can be
removed by passing it through two six-foot plastic media trickl-
filters, operated at the nitrogen loading equal to 0.63 kg/m2
-day in the first filter and 0.24 kg/m2-day in the second
filter.
     Both pH and DO decreased and increased after the waste-
water traveled through filter 1 and filter 2, respectively.
Dissolved oxygen never became the growth-!imitina factor because
its concentration was over 3.0 mg/1.   The effluent total  and
suspended solids were extremely low and the sludge settle-
ablity was very high with an averaged SVI = 110.  Fila-
mentous microorgansims was seldom found in the sludge and they
were probably transferred to the filter from the effluent of
the activated sludge plant.  That is why the outgrowth of fila-
mentous microorganisms never occurred.
     The alkalinity requirement for fixed-film biological
nitrification is somewhat different from that observed from
suspended growth systems.  The quantity of alkalinity destory-
ed per unit of ammonia nitrogen removed is always below normal
value of 7.2 in both, filters presently investigated if the
nitrogen loading was kept to exceed 0.25 kg/m2-day.   Both
nitrifiers and heterotrophic microrganisms play an important
role in nitrogen assimilation when the feed rate and the
nitrogen load are high.   This explains why the alkalinity
demand for biological nitrification is lower under the above
mentioned condition.

REFERENCE

1. Poduska, R.  A., and Andrews, J.  F.,  "Dynamics of Nitrifi-
   cation in the Activated Sludge Process," Jour,  of Water
   Poll. Control Federation, Vol.  47.  pp.2599, 1975
                                690

-------
 2.   Downing.,  A.  L.,  et  al.,  "Nitrification  in
the Activated
Vol. 2, pp.130,
10.
11.
     Rotating Bioloc
     February 2-4,
     O'Shaughnessy,
Sludge Process," Jour. Inst. Sew. Purif.
1964.          "
Lijklema, L., "Model for Nitrification in Activated Sludge
Process," Environ. Sci. & Techno!., Vol. 7, pp, 428, 1973.
Stenquist, R, J,, Parker, D. S., and Dosh, T. J., "Carbon
Oxidation-Nitrification In Synthetic Media Trickling Filter,"
Jour, of Water Poll. Control Federation, Vol. 46, pp. 2327,
1974.
Ito, K., and Matsuo, T., "The Effect of Organic Loading on
Nitrification  In RBC Wastewater Treatment Processes,"
Proceedings of the First National Symposium/Workshop on
               n'cal Contactor Technology, Vol. 2, pp. 1165,
               I960.
               J. C., et al., "Nitrification of Municipal
Wastewater Using Rotating Biological Contactors," Proceed-
ings of the first National Symposium/Workshop on Rotating
Biological Contactor Technology, Vol. 2, pp. 1193, February
2-4, 1980.
Zenz, D. R., et al., "Pilot Scale Studies On the Nitrification
of Primary and Secondary Effluents Using Rotating Biological
Discs at the Metropolitan Sanitary  District Of Greater
Chicago," Proceedings of the First National Syposiurn/Workshop
on Rotating Biological Contactor Technology, Vol. 2 pp. 1221,
February 2-4,  1980.
Standard Method for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,
14 th Edition, APHA-AWWA-WPCF,  1975 _   .
Zenz, .D. R., et al., "Pilot'.Scale Studies On the Nitrification
of Primary and Secondary Effluents Using Rotating Biological
Discs at Metropolitan Sanitary  District of Greater Chicago,"
Proceedings of the First National Symposium/Workshop on
Rotating Biological Contactor Technology, Volume II, pp. 1221,
Champion, Pennsylvania, 1980
O'Shaughnessy, J. C., et al., "Nitrification of Municipal
Wastewater Using Rotating Biological Contactors," Proceedings
of the First National Symposium/Workshop on Rotating Biological
Contactor Technology, Volume II, pp.1193, Champion, Pennsylvania,
1980.  ,
Clark, J. W., et al., "Hater Supply and Pollution Control, pp,
743, Harper & Row Publishers, New York, 1977,
                               891

-------
       PART VIII:   INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
     UPGRADING  SLAUGHTERHOUSE  EFFLUENT  WITH  ROTATING
                  BIOLOGICAL CONTACTORS
     Torleiv Bilstad,  Department of Environmental
     Engineering,  University of Rogaland,
     N-4001  Stavanger, Norway
INTRODUCTION

     The purpose of this work was to extend the potentially
attractive rotating biological contactor (RBC) process to
upgrade treated slaughterhouse wastewater effluent from a
biological tower.  The research was primarily concerned with
demonstrating  the RBC potential for removing biochemical
oxygen demand (BOD) from 1ow-temperature wastewater.
Attention was concentrated on the time to reach process
stability and treatment performance with low-temperature
wastewater.
     The RBC-pilot plant, described more completely below,
receives a constant wastewater flow of 1.6 1/min. of settled
effluent from a tower trickling filter (bio-tower).  The
organic loading to the pilot plant varies over time; from a
soluble BOD/of 50 mg/1 to as high as 700 mg/1.  The higher
organic loading does not negatively affect RBC-treatment
performance.  In fact, percent removal of BOD increases
with increasing organic loading.
     Process stability measured as percent BOD removed in
10°C wastewater, was reached  in approximately three weeks
after  start-up.  The bio-tower preceeding the RBC  is
                             892

-------
considered a "roughing" process as it reduces the organic
loading on the RBC to a level that allows "optimal" removal.
This combination, bio-tower and RBC, therefore, enables the
treatment plant to meet new secondary treatment requirements
and other possibly more stringent requirements adoptable in
the future.
     According to the literature, the number of treatment
flowsheets that can be derived by combining various biologi-
cal treatment processes is nearly endless.  Combinations of
trick!ing-filter and activated-sludge processes are the more
common flowsheets.  These processes have be used successfully
for a number of years for the treatment of all types of
wastewater, especially combined domestic and industrial
wastewater  (1).
     The process microbiology for combined biological treat-
ment processes is essentially the same as for the  individual
processes.  The biological activity in the bio-tower, the
"roughing"  filter in this research, will be somewhat diffe-
rent from  the RBC because of the higher shearing action
resulting  from the hydraulic flowrates applied to  the tower.
The bio-tower moreover acts  to reduce the organic  loading on
the RBC, making nitrification a possibility, expecially
during periods with higher wastewater temperatures,  i.e.;
above  10 C.
     The bio-tower effluent  is piped to an adjoining fjord
with the outfall-pipe  extending to  a depth of 43 m.  The
fjord  is showing  signs of deterioration with algae growth
and anoxic zones  due to the  total communal load of domestic
and industrial wastewater.   It is therefore encouraging that
the RBC-pilot  plant performs well as this process  may
be the future  mode of  "polishing" the existing bio-tower
effluent.
 INSTALLATION AND START-UP

      Figure 1  shows  the location of the  plant.   The  present
 effluent is piped through two 0.16 m diameter pipes, a
 length of 240 m along the side-slope of  the fjord, to a
 depth of 43 m.  A schematic of the treatment plant is
 shown in Figure 2.
                                893

-------
                                                    HORGE.FJORW
                           SAHDKES
Figure 1.  The fjord-system surrounding the cities of
           Sandnes and Stavanger in the south-west of  Norway.
           The slaughterhouse is situated at AGRO, in  the
           lower portion of the figure.
                               894

-------
                                        EQUILIZATION
— =>


WELL


WET
WELL



SCREENS

-


REMOVAL


440 m3 TOWER
TRICKLING FILTER




BASIN 650 m3



SEDIMENTATION
BASIN 85 m3
—

      ROTATING BIOLOGICAL
      CONTACTOR 47 m2
      CHEMICAL SLUDGE
      CONDITIONING
FILTER
PRESS
Figure 2.  Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment flow-diagram


The slaughterhouse operates on one eight-hour work shift per
day, beginning at 7:00 a.m.  Treated effluent from the
440 m3, 7.8 m high plastic packed bio-tower is recycled at a
rate of 50% during slaughterhouse production hours, and 100%
when there is no flow from the equilization basin.  The
recycling of treated effluent is performed in order to
dilute the raw wastewater from the slaughterhouse before it
reaches the bio-mass in the tower, and to ascertain fluid
to the bio-mass at any one time, especially during off-
production hours at the slaughterhouse, to prevent dry-out
of the microorganisms.
     The pilot plant module is a 0.92 m diameter four-stage
RBC unit mounted in a fiberglas tank; S5 Rotordisk, manu-
factured by CMS Equipment Limited, Mississauga, Ontario,
Canada.  Each stage is 0.3 m long and the total contact
surface area for the entire unit is 47 m2 (500 ft2).
The four-stage rotorzone volume is 0.41 m3 (14.5 ft3) and
gives a theoretical detention time of 4.3 hours at a manu-
facturer recommended wastewater:flow of 2.3 m3/d, equivalent
to a hydraulic loading of 0.05 m3/m2-d.
     Approximately 40% of the RBC surface area is submerged
in wastewater and the rotational speed is three revolutions
each minute giving a peripheral speed of 0.14 m/s.  The
S5 Rotordisk  is a package wastewater treatment plant and
                             895

-------
contains in addition to the four rotorzones, a 1.4 m3 primary
clarifyer and a 0.6 m3 final clarifyer.  The whole unit is
enclosed.  Figure 3 gives the plan view and a sectional side
view of the RBC-pilot plant.
     After start-up, time was allowed for a biological slime
layer to develop on the rotating media.  The average waste-
water temperature during the start-up period was approximate-
ly 10 C throughout the RBC.  The hydraulic loading was con-
stant at 0.05 m3/m2-d, whereas the organic loading varied
substantially over time with an average total BOD7 of
645 mg/1, equivalent to an organic loading of 32 g total
BOD7/m2-d.
     Table I and Figure 4 indicate that process stability
was reached in approximately three weeks.  In fact total BOD
removal was 71% and total chemical oxygen demand removal (COD)
was 61% after 16 days.  Obviously, this period was too short
for nitrification to develop and hence, removal of ammonia
nitrogen (NH3) was not evident.  The 10 C wastewater tempera-
ture and high organic loading did not exactly provide optimal
conditions for the nitrifying organisms.  The pH was approxi-
mately 7.5 and the alkalinity was 50 mg/1 as CaC03 or higher,
over the same period.
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

     Several series of experiments  have been conducted during
the weeks after  start-up.  The wastewater  temperature through
the RBC has been relatively cold; approximately  10  C.  Grab
samples of influent to the bio-tower,  of influent to the  RBC,
of wastewater  from the four RBC-stages, and from the RBC-
effluent were  collected  at various  times in order to deter-
mine changes in  wastewater characteristics through  the
treatment system.  Grab  samples  were  periodically coupled
with flow-proportioned composite samples collected  either
manually or by an ISCO Model!  2100  automatic wastewater
sampler.  Wastewater  flow, temperature, pH and dissolved
oxygen (DO) were measured at  the plant during sampling.   The
choice of laboratory  parameters  varied and included alka-
linity, nitrogen, phosphorous,  BOD', COD and total organic
carbon (TOC).  Unless otherwise  stated, analyses were con-
ducted on filtrate passing a  1 ym. poresize glasfibre filter.
     The TOC analyses were conducted on a  Beckman,  Model!
915-B  Total Organic  Carbon Analyzer.   Continuous BOD versus
                             896

-------
                      1.80 M
 (N

 (N
                SNITT  A-A
           SLUDGE
           STOR
SLUDGE STORAGE
I
Figure 3.   Plan  and  sectional side view of the RBC,
           S5  Rotordisk.
                            897

-------
PERCENT
REMOVAL+
40 -•


30- •

20 --


10 •-
         0
                                             	BOD
                                             	COD
                                    4-
            3        6         9

            DAYS  AFTER START-UP
                                             12
15
 Figure 4.   Total  BOD7 and COD removal during start-up of
            the  RBC.
                         Table I

      RBC Treatment  Characterises with 10°C Wastewater.
Days
after
start-up
3
7
9
16

Inf.
295
525
780
630
TBOD7 (mg/1)
Eff. %R
263 11
385 27
382 , 51
,185 71

.Inf.
568
785
900
971
.TCOD.(mg/l)
Eff.
550
690
640
384

%R
3
12
29
61
                                898

-------
time curves were developed on an automatic instrument by use
of electrolytic respirotnetry; Voith Sapromat, Model  C 12,
J.M. Voith GmbH; 7920 Heidenheim, West Germany.   A schematic
diagram of a measuring unit is shown in Figure 5.  Each
measuring unit comprises one reaction vessel, one oxygen
generator and one pressure indicator which are interconnected
by plastic hoses.  The sealed measuring system is not affect-
ed by barometric air pressure fluctuations.
     The required oxygen for the microorganisms is at any
time available in the electrolytic cell and is always
supplied in sufficient quantity to the sample of wastewater
to be analyzed.  The BOD value which can be measured is
limited as the maximum oxygen demand of the sample may not
exceed 90 trig/1-h.  If BOD5 values higher than 3000 mg'/l are
encountered, it is good practice ta dilute the sample.
Therefore, in contrast to the conventional BOD dilution
method, a genuine respiratory process takes place in the
Sapromat.
                                           7B9 limn
                                                O O O Q O
 Figure 5.  Schematic diagram of a Sapromat measuring  unit
            where A.= Reaction vessel, B = Oxygen  generator,
            C = Pressure indicator, T = Magnetic stirrer,
            2 = Sample, 3 = C02 absorber, 4 = Pressure indica-
            tor, 5 -= Electrolyte, 6 - Electrodes,  7 =  Measur-
            ing and control unit with digital printer
                                  899

-------
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

     A typical treatment performance of the bio-tower and RBC
system, four and five weeks after start-up, is summarized in
Tables II  and III respectively.   The RBC pilot plant  reaches
equilibrium with respect to organic removal approximately
three weeks after start-up.  However, as would be expected for
the 10 C wastewater, nitrification was not apparent until the
fifth week of operation.  Impending nitrification is illu-
strated by a small production of nitrites (N02) and nitrates
(N03) as in Figure 6.  The RBC pilot plant has not experienced
problems with low concentrations of dissolved oxygen (DO).
Figure 7 is typical in this respect, indicating adequate
oxygen mass transfer in all four RBC-stages.

Four Ueeks After Start-up

     The soluble (filtered) long-term BOD concentrations ob-
tained from the bio-tower and RBC pilot plant during a typical
slaughterhouse production day are illustrated in Figure 8.
The analyses were performed on composite afternoon samples,
each comprised of five half-hourly  grab samples.  These long-
term BOD curves are especially illustrative in the case of
the RBC-effluent where the effect of nitrification showed up
very clearly for the non-inhibited  nitrogenous BOD.  The
Sapromat oxygen uptake reaction was performed on non-diluted
wastewater which, no doubt, was of  great importance for the
slow-growing nitrifiers.  The standard  dilution BOD-method
often retards nitrification because of  a population decrease
of the nitrifying bacteria (2).
     The rate of nitrification, and therefore the rate of
growth and length of generation times of the nitrifying
organisms, is affected by several environmental factors
including temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen.  Borchardt
(3) estimated the rate of nitrification at 9 C to be about
50% of the rate  at  20 C.  The RBC did not  provide a long
enough sludge-age after four weeks  of operation to provide
nitrification at  9  C.  The 20 C water-bath in the Sapromat
coupled with  six  days of incubation provided such a sludge-
age for the  RBC-effluent sample  (Figure 8).  The pH of the
wastewater was normally above 7.0.
     Successful  removal of carbonaceous material expressed as
BOD, COD  or  TOC  is  apparent from  Figure 9  and Table II.   The
hydraulic loading was constant at 0.05  m3  /m2-d which yielded
                                900

-------

























1— i
1— 1

cu
1 '
_Q

1—







































S-
•p
rd
CU
-P
_cp

.
Q.

S-
03
OO

^
-P r—

CI co •
•r- 0
i — O
fO CO
r~~ CW
=a: E



. c
cu o

£="£
tO -P
OO 00




cu

•1™ _^
t— 0
o
CD i —
i — O
0.-
E^
OO


*— CD CM CM
CD t — CD CD



CO CM •* t—
CTl Cn CD t—
CM OO i£)



=a- CM CD CM
un oo vo r~^





CM to LO co
•=— CO CM CM
'*-' "~ *~






t IT) CM CD
<^J* •<: — *c—







Ln un CD i-n
CM oo en vo
^— CM CM






i— i Ll_
i 2: u-
S_ i— i V— UJ
CU 1 1 1
3 CJ) C_3 C_5
O CO CQ CQ
H~* £t: c^ o:






CD
OO
» « — ~ ~
p^
CD




i — CM CM "=i- .
CD CD CD CD



r~ co oo <=d-
•* CD OO !*>•
. CO r^ ^t- «=l-



CD un r~~ T—
CTi *r— <^- <^t~
CM •rr-




CM CD Cn -^1-
oo 10 CD r-^
CD LO T-






CD CD CM •=}•
CD CT> UD OO
r- oo






ID CD LO 1-n
CO CM CM CD
CM CM CM





	
l—i li
i z: u_
S_ 1— 1 -r- LU
CD 1 1 1
3 o c_j o
O CQ CQ CQ
H~ 01 o: o:






CD
oo
• • ~ — ™
cj-
« —




CD i — i — CM
CD CD CD CD



CD OO l~>. UD
OO CD •«— tO
"^t* r*^ ^i" LO



«^- ' r-» r-. i^
to" CD co to
^ — V*"




to CD CM r~.
tO VD LT) <—
UO OO •<— r—






1 1^0
tn «d-







CD CD un ID
CD 
-------
                 I—
01
      to
      0)
      cu
      o>
      O)
u_

 0)
 o
 c
 (t)
      q_

       ai
      a.
       CU
                    O
                 o  en
                 CJ  E
            I  >>  m

            CO -»-» O

           -i<£ -r- O

           r— C (T3

           «=C T- CJ
                     O.
                     o
                    ID O
                    E to
                    to -(->
                   OO 00
                  O)
                      CU  O
                  oo
                                   CD co cn oo
                                                         CM
                                                                oo oo co to r-.
                               CD CD oo CM
                                                                co c\j
                                                                         LO
                                   01 CD LO oo uo oo    co cr> CM CM oo r~~ oo
                               CM ID CM LO UO CO CO    •*-"
                               10
                                                co oo
                                         co co cri co
                                                         oo to
                                                                          CD co
                                                                          oo oo
                                                                oo oo •=— •=—
                                  I oo 10
                                                                      tn
                                                                cri en co vo 10
                                      un LO LO un tn
                                                                                     CD
                                                                                     C7>
                                                                                     re
                                                                                X
                                                                                CU
                                                                                      cu
                                                                                      o
                                                                                      O)
                          CD co CD oo
                          «^- CM CD CD
                                          CTl CO
                                                          un 01 CD cr> LO CM oo
   OO CD CO I"-- CO CTl
                                un CD CD in CD un
                                 co 10 uo m «d-
                                      en CD
                             UO CM CD CD UO
                               •  •   •   •   •

                             CD ID I— |-~- l~-
                                                          LO
CD CD LO LO LO f>. CD

^J- I— VD l~~ LT) •* UO
                                                           I   I
                                                            I   I
                                   oo •
                                       CO LO
                                         •   •

                                      • CD CD
                                 S- I— 1
                                I—
                                oo
                              m
                                              Lu.

                                              Lu
                                              UJ
                                 o <_> o c_> o
                                              ro
                                 CU  I   I   I
                                 •
                                          CM OO •
 S_ l-H *— CM OO •* LLJ

 cu  i   i   i   i   i   i
 3 O C_3 O C_5 CJ O
 O CO CO CO CO CO CO
                                                          CTl
                                               90'2

-------
T3
 OJ
 13
 O
 O
 O)
r—
_d
          oo
          O
          CM
          O
            J-
          o
          O-
                 CD
                 Q.
                 cn
               IN
          o o
          O cn
          O E
                 O

                :  co

                  cn
            CD --^
            O Cn
             O) O
             (0 -(->
             (>1 CO
 CD     O
r—  

                         CD CM OO OO LO LO LO
                                       OO •*- UO «— OO CM •=—

                                       CD •<— OO «* UO VO UO
                            •=— co uo •«— cn to

                            UO CM tO OO OO CD
                                                   r> oo CD r~» CM co cn
                                                   cn uo oo LO LO -^- CM
                                                   CM cn LO <3- -=± •* "3-
                                                                                cn
                                                                                co
                                                                                Q.
                                                                     X
                                                                     CD
                                                                     c
                    un CM CM cvj «—
                   i LO un un Ln LO
CD OO CM -—  up un un «d~ <^f
                            cn •«— co i-» to to
                            r~^ to un un un un
              un —
un un CD CD un uo un
r^ un cn co to un un
*— CM
                                                    i   il
                                                    i   i  i  i   i   i   i
                                                    i   ii   i   i
                                                                    -t->
                                                                     E
                                                                     O
                                                                     P
 o>
r—

 CO
 i. l—l •«— CM OO •=*• UJ
 Q)  I   I   I   I   I    I
 3OOOOOO
 O CO CO CQ CO CO CQ
i— c£. ex. c£. o: o; c£
CD
OO
                                                   oo
                                              903

-------
         CM
          O E
          (O
             -I- C_>
             E rtS
             -r- O
             I— CD
               CD
CU
O
cu
            CU O
            (13 4->
            00 CO
           cu
                 o
t—  CO  O

 t£o
 03 I	
oo     o
                                 Ln CO OO OO    CM OO CO OO OO CM O1
                       CD CD
                       r — ID
                                 CO
                                       IO
                                                CD CD CD CM -
                                                               Ln
                                 to co •
                                                co i
                                                      •=!• oo
                                                                 • cr>
                       oo co CM to in 10 «3-
                       IQ CD to LO in -=d- •=*•
                       CD  CD CTl OO CM CM
                                                   cr> in
                                                CD ou
                                                    - oo
                                               10 to to
                                                                  
                                       CM en
                                                OO
                                                      CM |-~- OO t— CD
                                                                             cu
             en LO •
                              CM cr> co
                              •«— oo r>-
                              OO CM •«— •
                               , -T—    ooooLnoomooco
                                OO    CO CM CT> Ln CD "T- CO
                        CD LO CD LO ID un CD
                        Ln 01 Ln CD co r-« UD
                                      Ln CD CD CD un CD
                                      «^ oo r^ •* ^— CD
                                      «— co •«—•«—•«—'—
                              oo oo
                                       oo
                           CM oo -^r Ln T—
                             •   •   •  *   •
                           CM oo Ln to r^
                              in CD Ln Ln
                                •   •  •  •
                              CD CD CT> C7l
                                           U_    1—1
                         S- 1-1
                         0)
CM OO
 I
                                         I   I
   OOOOOO
 O CQ CQ CD CQ CQ CO
H- o; o; o: o; o: o;
                                       S- H-l
                                       CU
                                                        I
                                  CM OO -
                                      I
                                                  SOOOCJOCJ)
                                                  O CO CO CO CO CO O3
                                          ce:
                                                a: o;
                                                         o;
                                         904

-------
           oo
           o
           •
           CM
           O
            J-
           o
           O-
                  CT>
                 Cu
                  CT>
           QO
           O  CD
           CJ>  E
              4-> O
              -i- o
               c: to
              -t- c_>
              i— 01
             O
                CO
-o
 O)
c
o
o
              CJ>
             O
    c
 o>  o
"a.4J
 E  eo
 to 4->
co co
            O)     O
           i—   ID <=}- CM
                         tn ^— r-^ liD to i_n in
                         IO
                «* LO

                uo un
                          CM •«— UD CM cr> en un

                          CD o> r-^. r~« to to i£>
CO CD LO CO CO CD
p^ CD CM CD r~. tn
CM IO CM CM «— •<—
CD CD in CD CD CD CD
CT> <£> cn cri r-^ un •<—
   CO ^~" ^~ ^~ ^^ ^~
                                to 10 r~. i—  i
   LO r>- CD CD to  i
     •   *  •  •   •
   CD CO Ln to U3
   CD LO CD CD CO  I
     •   •  •  »   •
   *a- ^- T— .*- CD
 S- l—• *— CM CO <* LU
 O)  I   I   I   I   I   I
 S o c_> o o c_) c_)
 O CQ CQ CQ D3 CQ CQ
CD
CO
O-i
                                           905

-------
    NO 2

    NO 3

     mg
      I
         3 --
         2  -•
        TOWER-IN RBC-IN
—I	1	1	-t-
 STAGE-1  STAGE-2   STAGE-3   STAGE-4

    SAMPLING   STATIONS
Figure 6.   Impending  nitrification depicted by a small
           production of nitrite and nitrate five weeks
           after start-up.
     RBCHN  STAGE-1   STAGE-2  STAGE-3  STAGE-4


Figure 7.  Dissolved  oxygen  through the RBC system.
                             906

-------
 200 ••
 100 ••
              2        U         68

              INCUBATION   TIME  (DAYS)
Figure 8.  Long-term soluble BOD analyzed on the Sapromat.
           Nitrification is evident in the one RBC-effluent
           sample where nitrification is not inhibited.
                               907

-------
an organic loading of 17.8 g BOD5/m2-d and 19.5 g BOD7/m2-d.
Maximum recommended loading values in Norway are 15 g
BOD7/m2-d at 10 C for 85% BOD7-removal, and a maximum of 7.5  g
BOC7/m2-d if nitrification is intended (4).
     The removal of soluble BOD was more than 90% in the RBC
pilot plant.  The effluent BOD5 and BOD7 were approximately
25 mg/1 and 35 mg/1 respectively, four weeks after start-up.
To give an indication of the solid separation efficiency in
the  RBC-final clarifier, the total (unfiltered) BODg and
BOD7 were 38 mg/1 and 46 mg/1 respectively for the situation
  mg
  I
  800  -
 600
  400  - -
  200  •-
    	COD
	BO D
         TOC
     TOWER-IN     RBC-IN      STAGE-1       RBC-EFF

                       SAMPLING  STATIONS


 Figure 9.  Removal of substrate in the tower trickling
            filter and rotating biological contactor four
            weeks after start-up.
                               908

-------
depicted in Figures 8 and 9.  The evidence furthermore indi-
cated that the soluble BOD removal percentage in the RBC pilot
plant increased with increasing BOD concentration in the
influent.

Five Weeks After Start-up

     The data presented in Table III and Figure 6 suggest
impending nitrification.  The increasing concentration of N02+
N03 through the RBC pilot plant was consistent during the
24-hour period making up the data.  This was not unwarranted
as Figure 8 revealed the presence of nitrifiers in the RBC-
effluent four weeks after start-up.  The BOD-test was per-
formed on fiberglass-filtered, undiluted and nonseeded waste-
water and, as mentioned earlier, the impending nitrification
would probably not have been detected by a standard BOD-
dilution test.  In addition to dilution of the sample, the
standard BOD test also incorporates seeding with raw waste-
water containing heterotrophic bacteria thereby possibly nega-
ting nitrification.
     The principle of biologically induced nitrogen removal
in wastewater treatment ficilities is based on the activity of
populations of autotrophic nitrifying bacteria and their
capability to oxidize ammonia (NH3-N) to N02 and N03.  In
addition to nitrification, microorganisms other than the
nitrifiers require nitrogen for growth.  The amount of nitro-
gen assimilated during oxidation of carbonaceous material has
been placed at 5% of the oxygen demand (C : N : P = TOO : 5 :
1).  That means removal of NH3-N during biological treatment
of wastewater may be because of assimilation, not necessarily
nitrification.  A production of N02 + N03 as in Figure 6,
however, indicates nitrification.
     As mentioned earlier, nitrification is affected primari-
ly by pH, DO and temperature.  Also, at neutral pH levels
there is usually insignificant nitrification until soluble
BOD has been oxidized (5).  Hence, to  evaluate the RBC per-
formance for NH3 removal, progression of treatment within the
RBC stages must be assesed.  Oxidation of carbonaceous
substrate, expressed as soluble COD is presented in Figure 10
and Table III.  The observed COD decrease coupled with the
N02 + N03 increase shown in Figure 6, clearly indicate that
the conditions were amenable for nitrification.  The impend-
ing nitrification was also suggested by the decrease in alka-
linity and soluble Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) in Table III.
                               909

-------
COD
 200-
 100
                   TIME  OF DAY (O'CLOCK)
  Figure  10.   Reduction  of  COD  through the RBC for a typical
              slaughterhouse  production  day.
                                910

-------
     There is no doubt that the BOD removed by the bio-tower
was the more readily biodegradable fraction of the wastewater.
The soluble COD in the RBC-effluent was approximately 100 mg/1
and probably would not decrease much more if further biologi-
cal treatment was provided.  This study supports the evidence
that when wastewater is sent through a series of trickling
filters, or recycled several times through the same filter,
the removability of wastewater organics decreases as the
number of passe£ increases  (6).


CONCLUSIONS

     The application and start-up performance of a RBC pilot
plant unit for upgrading clarified trickling filter effluent
has been described.  Although the operational experience has
been very short, the following remarks can be made from
treatment of a 10 C slaughterhouse wastewater:
1.   RBC process stability  with respect to BOD removal was
     reached in approximately three weeks after start-up.
     The RBC-biofilm became mature relatively fast due to
     seeding of microorganisms from the bio-tower.
2.   The hydraulic loading  to the RBC was constant at
     0.05 mVm2- d whereas the organic loading varied from
     approximately 2 g soluble BOD7/m2-d to 35 g soluble
     BOD7/m2-d.  A typical  slaughterhouse production day
     organic loading is approximately 20 g soluble
     BOD7/m2-d, resulting  in a soluble carbonaceous BOD7
     effluent concentration of approximately 35 mg/1.
3.   The Sapromat analysis  for soluble BOD did not require
     seeding or dilution of the wastewater to be tested.
     The nitrifiers present will therefore perform immediate-
     ly  if other environmental conditions are satisfactory.
4.   The effect of low temperature wastewater on NH3-removal
     could not be verified  in  the short time after start-up.
     This will be a question to answer after prolonged RBC
     operation.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     This study was supported  by funds provided by the
Norwegian Environmental  Protection Agency  (SFT),  The author
wish to  thank  Damann Anderson, Pa-tti  Hantz, Arild Lohne,
01av Nordgulen and Sissel  R0ine for assistance.
                             911

-------
REFERENCES

1.   Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., "Wastewater Engineering:  Treatment,
     Disposal, Reuse", McGraw-Hill, Chapter 9, 1979.
2.   Dague, R.E., "Inhibition of Nitrogenous BOD and Treat-
     ment Plant Performance Evaluation", Journal  of the Water
     Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 53, No. 12,  December
     1981, pp 1738-1741.
3.   Borchardt, J.A., "Nitrification in the Activated Sludge
     Process", Division of Sanitary and Water Resources
     Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1966.
4.   Statens Forurensingstilsyn, "Retningslinjer for Dimen-
     sjonering av Avlapsrenseanlegg", p 42, Oslo, 1978.
5.   Miller, R.D., et al., "Rotating Biological Contactor
     Process for Secondary Treatment and Nitrification
     Following a Trickling Filter",, Techn. Report 7905,
     U.S. Army Med. Bioeng. R & D Lab., June 1979.
6.   Poon, P.C., et al.,  "Upgrading with Rotating Biological
     Contactors for BOD Removal", Journal of the Water
     Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 53, No. 4, April 1981,
     pp 474-481.
                               912

-------
       EVALUATION OF AN ANAEROBIC ROTATING BIOLOGICAL
        CONTACTOR SYSTEM FOR TREATMENT OF A MUNITION
             WASTEWATER CONTAINING ORGANIC AND
                     INORGANIC NITRATES
       Leonard L. Smith, Hercules Aerospace Division,
       Hercules Incorporated, Radford Army Ammunition
       Plant, Radford, Virginia.
INTRODUCTION

     Radford Army Ammunition Plant (RAAP),  like most of the
Army propellant and explosive manufacturing plants, was built
in the early 1940s to supply munitions for World War II.  In
1970, the Army initiated modernization programs at its ammu-
nition plants to replace obsolete facilities and improve the
safety of operations.  As part of this modernization program
a continuous automated multi-base line (CAMBL) manufacturing
facility was planned for construction at RAAP to augment the
present labor intensive batch-process.  This paper describes
the studies that were conducted to develop design criteria
for a facility to treat the wastewaters that will be gener-
ated in the CAMBL.

WASTEWATER CHARACTERIZATION

     A wastewater characterization study was conducted for
the CAMBL manufacturing facilities.  Samples of the waste-
waters were collected and analyzed during the evaluation of a
prototype CAMBL manufacturing line.  These data were compiled,
and the expected characterization of the full-scale facili-
ties were determined.  The quantity of water requiring	
                          913

-------
treatment from the CAMBL- facility" was determined to be •approx-
imately 50,000 gallons per day.  This wastewater"Will contain
acetone, ethanol, nitroglycerin (NG), nitroguanidine (NGu),
other propellant ingredients, and inorganic nitrates.

LABORATORY TREATMENT STUDIES.

     Laboratory-scale treatment studies were conducted to
determine the feasibility of selected treatment methods and to
define the design parameters for pilot plant studies.
     Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the bio-
degradability of NGu using a biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)
test kit.  The tests were set up to determine the oxygen
uptake rate of the readily biodegradable organic solvents
alone, and then with various quantities of NGu added.  This
testing showed that NGu is not biodegradable by itself, but
when combined with a readily biodegradable carbon source NGu
is biodegradable.
     Studies conducted by Wendt (1) showed that NG is biode-
gradable, but it does exert .a.'toxic effect on the biological
metabolism.
     The biodegradability of NG and NGu was. further studied
using a laboratory-scale rotating biological contactor (bio
disc) unit.  The wastewater utilized for this study was a
mixture of wastewater from the manufacture of other propel-
lants, waste process water from the manufacture of NG, and
the CAMBL pilot line effluent.  During the study, the bio disc
influent contained a chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentra-
tion ranging from 500 to 1000 mg/1, a NGu concentration
varying from 30 to 70 mg/1, and a NG concentration of approxi-
mately 5 mg/1.  During this period, the COD removal was
approximately 90 percent; the NGu removal ranged between 50
and 90 percent while achieving 100 percent NG removal.
     Based upon the wastewater characterization and laboratory
studies, two design concepts were considered for this proposed
xjastewater treatment facility: (a) design a ^completely new
chemical-physical treatment facility for the treatment of this
wastewater alone, or (b) expand on the aerobic rotating bio-
logical contactor (RBC) treatment plant under construction at
RAAP for the treatment of the wastewater from the existing
manufacturing facilities.
     Alternative (b) was selected for the pilot plant
evaluation, based on the estimated savings of over $800,000
in capital costs and an annual savings of about $160,000 in
operating costs.  The characterization of the wastewaters
from the existing manufacturing facilities, the proposed
                             914

-------
CAMBL facility, and the combined facilities are shown in
Table I.
        Table I.  Characterization of Waste Waters of
                  Existing and Proposed Facilities
Parameter
                                  Increase Due
Existing  Continuous  Combined    to Continuous
Facility  Facility    Facilities  Facility
Flow (mgd)     1.245      0.058       1.303

COD (Ib/day)   7818       1886        6604
    (mg/1)    .                        607

BOD (Ib/day)   1887       754         2641
   .(mg/1)                            243

N03 (Ib/day)   3024       144         3168
    (mg/1)                            304

NG (Ib/day)     —        14.3        14,3
   (mg/1)                             1.50

NGu (Ib/day)    —        57.4        57.4
    (mg/1)                            5.28
                                      4.6%

                                      40%


                                      40%


                                      4.7%
     The permit issued by the EPA and Commonwealth of Virginia
for the wastewater discharge from the aerobic KBC treatment
plant was based upon this facility treating the wastewater
from the present manufacturing facilities only.  This requirec
that any new manufacturing facility to be constructed at RAAP
must also provide facilities for treatment of the wastewater
generated by that facility to ensure the effluent quality is
not degraded.
     The aerobic RBC plant hydraulic capacity, as designed,
will be adequate for the additional wastewater flow, but
additional facilities will be required for the removal of the
additional organics, NG, NGu, and inorganic nitrates.  The
laboratory studies showed that an aerobic biological treat-
ment system appeared to be a suitable method for the removal
of the organics, NG and NGu.  However, an alternate treatment
                           915

-------
method will be required for' the. "removal of the inorganic'
nitrates.  This can best be accomplished by a biolo'gical de-
nitrification system.  Since additional RBC units will be
required for the organic removal, the decision was made to
evaluate on a pilot plant scale the use of submerged RBC units
for the biodenitrification process.

PILOT PLANT EVALUATION

     For the evaluation studies to develop the design criteria
for the treatment of the combined RAAP wastewaters, a one-half
meter bio surf pilot plant, capable of independent operation
of each stage as aerobic or anaerobic, was purchased from
Autotrol Inc.  This bio surf pilot plant consisted of a series
of 36 corrugated polyethylene discs containing a total of 250
ft2 of surface area.  The discs and tank were divided into
four stages, separated by removable bulkheads.  Each bulkhead
consisted of a top and bottom section, whereby, each stage
could be operated either completely or 40 percent submerged.
     The first phase of the pilot plant evaluation was con-
ducted with all four stages completely submerged to determine
the feasibility of the decomposition of. the organic solvents,
NG and NGu, under anaerobic conditions and to determine the
rate of nitrate reduction in a biological denitrification
system.  An airtight cover was installed on the pilot plant to
prevent the diffusion of oxygen into the wastewater from the
atmosphere.  The system was operated during this period at a
hydraulic loading of 1.6 gpd/ft2 of surface area', and average
organic loadings of 6.0 pounds COD and 2.4 pounds BOD per day
per 1000 ft2 of surface area.   The NG and NGu concentrations
were both maintained between 1 and 5 mg/1.  During this phase
of the evaluation, the unit averaged 84 percent COD, 90 per-
cent BOD, 94 percent NGu, and 100 percent NG removal.  The
nitrate removal rate was calculated as a ratio of the-BOD
removal.  The BOD/NOs removal ratio during this phase of the
evaluation was 0.39.  This evaluation demonstrated the feasi-
aility of treating this wastewater by a biological denitrifi-
cation process to achieve the proposed discharge limitations.
     During the second phase of the evaluation, the third and
fourth stages of the pilot plant were converted to aerobic
stages.  This study was conducted to determine the effects of
anaerobic RBC units operating in series with the aerobic RBC
inits.   This change had little or no effect on the organics,
   and NGu, removal rates of the pilot plant.   Figure 1 shows
the COD influent and effluent concentration for this phase of
:he study.
                            916

-------
                         OQ

-------
     The"laboratory and preliminary pilot plant data indicated
that a biological denitrification KBC system followed by
aerobic KBC units is a feasible treatment method for the re-
moval of the organics, NG, NGu, and inorganic nitrates from
the CAMBL manufacturing facility.  A preliminary design of a
system for the treatment of the combined wastewaters consisted
of four additional completely submerged EEC shafts preceeding
the eight aerobic RBC shafts under construction.  To evaluate
the efficiency of this proposed system, the pilot plant bio
surf unit was converted to a four-stage system, the first stage
anerobic followed by three aerobic stages.  The sample collec-
tion points for the evaluation were selected at the first stage
influent and effluent, and the third stage effluent; therefore,
simulating the results from the proposed full-scale facility.
     During the first two weeks of this evaluation the COD
influent concentration was maintained between 400 and 600 mg/1,
the NG concentration approximately 1 to 5 mg/1, and the NGu
concentration between 10 and 20 mg/1.  Figure 2 shows the BOD
and COD influent and third stage effluent concentration during
this period.  The desired influent COD during this period was
450 mg/1.   However, due to the constant mixing of wastewaters
and the volatility of the organic solvents, wide day-to-day
fluctuations occurred.  It can be seen from Figure 2 that even
 ith these influent fluctuations, the effluent remained quite
 .onstant.
     Studies were conducted during the last month of the
avaluation to determine if this RBC system could^, operate
effectively under the worst conditions expected in a full-
scale facility and still produce arr-^ffluent meeting the
required discharge standards.  The system was operated at an
average organic loading of 1.3 times the design loading, NG
Loading of 3.5 times the design loading, and an NGu loading of
twice the design loading.  The system was operated at a low
temperature of from 6 to 12°C during this period.  See Figure
3 for the results of this evaluation.  Figure 4 shows the
average BOD and COD remaining and the cumulative BOD and COD
removal efficiency after each stage of treatment for this
 tudy.  During this phase, the allowable daily average COD of
L90 mg/1 was exceeded on only two days; however, the maximum
laily COD effluent concentration of 290 mg/1 was never
sxceeded.   These adverse operating conditions reduced the
iverage COD removal from 85 percent to 74 percent during this
>eriod.  The NG and NGu removals during this period were near
LOO percent most of the time.
     Thje data from the pilot plant bio surf evaluation were
malyzed to determine the ratio of organic removal rates to
                            918

-------
                                     o
                                     o



                                  3*3

                                  ^: so
                                 co
                                                  CJ1

           00
                 m   o
                *   g
           CO
                           t
                            I
                            1
                            f
                             t
                            col

                            -\
                              919

-------
                             IS
                             — 05
              _»  IO
                        4k  CJ1  O5
«S'


i

CO
 I

                                 o  o
:  f    i
            :   &..
           00
           CO
           o
                  1   1   1
                i

                i
             --•1
             - s,
              e»

              v>
                    ^
           I
        I S

        ';
       f  S
                      920

-------
                                        S3  "•
O  oo
-   «
              0
              00
s
b,
              s
              00
O
                                                                          00
                                                                          o
                                                                          
-------
bhe" inorganic nitrates removal rates under various operating
conditions.  As stated above, during the first pha~s~e of the
evaluation the pilot plant cover was installed to provide a
completely anaerobic system.  This evaluation showed the BOD/
N03 removal ratio to be 0.39, which would calculate to provide
an average nitrate removal rate of 13.6 lb/day/1000 ft2 for
the full-scale system.  During the later evaluations, the bio
surf cover was removed and the wastewater in the anaerobic
stage was exposed to the atmosphere, allowing oxygen to dif-
fuse into the wastewater, greatly reducing the nitrate removal
rate (see Figure 5).  Based on the results of this phase, the
nitrate removal rate was calculated to be 3.4 Ib N03/day/1000
ft2 for the full-scale system.  The great differences in the
nitrate removal rate between a covered and uncovered system
can provide a method to control the nitrate utilization of the
submerged RBC stage in the full-scale facility.  The system
can be designed with removable cover section to provide a
flexibility to compensate for low or high nitrate concentra-
tions in the facilities influent.
     The results from these evaluations were analyzed to pro-
vide the data necessary for the preparation of the design
criteria for the proposed facility.  The organic load applied
was plotted versus the organic load removed for the pilot
plant anaerobic system (see Figure 6).  A similar graph was
also prepared for the first two aerobic stages (Figure 7).
These graphs can be used to predict the efficiencies of the
full-scale facility at various organic and hydraulic loading.
The design of the expanded system at RAAP was analyzed, using
these graphs.
     Based upon the data from this evaluation, the design
criteria for an addition to the RAAP RBC treatment facility
were prepared.  Figure 8 shows the flow diagram of the pro-
posed RAAP facility for the treatment of combined wastewater.
These design criteria were submitted to the Corps of Engineers
for the design of the addition to the facility.  The final
design was completed and construction of the facility at RAAP
nas been initiated.

REFERENCES

1.  Wendt, T. M., Cornell, J. H., and Kaplan, A.  M.,
    "Microbial Degradation of Glycerol Nitrates," Applied and
    Environmental Microbiology, Nov. 1978, pp 693-699.
                             922

-------
                  — *   ro
                                    un  o>
00   CO  O
o
90
                                923

-------
            as e»
        IS3  <
       •*•«»  m
       o  a
924

-------
925

-------
926

-------
     APPLICATION OF ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR (RBC)
       PROCESS FOR TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER CONTAINING
                 A FIREFIGHTING AGENT (AFFF)
     Susan Landon-Arnold, MS, R.M., Visiting Scientist,
     University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

     Deh Bin Chan, PhD., P.E., Research Civil Engineer,
     Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory, Port Hueneme, CA
INTRODUCTION

     A firefighting agent, Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF),
has been used for fuel/oil fire extinguishment at airports
and on shipboard since 1970's. AFFF has been found to be the
most effective fuel/oil firefighting agent ever to be
formulated.  In accordance with firefighting performance
specifications used by the manufacturers, a 28-square foot
fuel fire can be extinguished within 45 seconds with a 6%
AFFF solution (by volume).
     AFFF consists of fluorochemical surfactants, hydro-
carbon surfactants, ethylene glycol and its derivatives, and
about 70% water (by weight).  In a firefighting operation,
the AFFF concentrate is diluted to a 3-6% solution (by
volume), and sprayed under pressure onto the fire.  The foam
created during the spray covers and extinguishes the fire.
AFFF concentrate (FC-780) contains an organic load of
approximately 380,000 mg/L COD, or 110,000 mg/L TOG or
325,000 mg/L BOD (Ref 1).  A toxicity test with fathead
minnows indicated that the 48-hour TLm (LCsn) concentration
was about 1800 ppm (FC-206, by volume) (Ref 2).  A maximum
                              927

-------
loading rate to an activated sludge treatment process (with
acclimation) was found to be 250 ppm (FC-206 by volume)
without the addition of an antifoam agent (Ref 2).
     The Rotating Biological Contactor (RBC) is considered
to be a most cost-effective wastewater treatment process due
to it being simple in operation, low in capital investment
and low in energy requirements.  The RBC will fit well with
trickling filter systems, which constitute approximately 95%
of the sewage treatment systems on military bases,  and will
upgrade the effluent water quality to meet the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit
standards.
     Increased popularity in the use of the RBC on military
bases is anticipated. This, in part, is due to the successes
experienced by other researchers for using the RBC to treat
various organic compounds, such as formaldehyde and formic
acid as well as the explosives RDX, HMX and TNT  (Ref 3).
Such research prompted the following experimentation for
determining the RBC's feasibility  (technically and economi-
cally) for treating AFFF containing wastewater.  The re-
search effort initially began with a chemostat study of the
parameters and microorganisms that were amenable to AFFF
bioconversion.  This was followed by experimentation with a
four-stage bench top RBC system.  The percent  (%) conversion
in COD, BOD and TOG was monitored as a means of determining
removal of AFFF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

     Two types of experimental systems were used in this
study.  One was an aerobic chemostat used as an approach to
determine initial feasibility, the other was a bench top
model of an RBC.

Chemostat

     Physical Set-Up;  A diagram of the chemostat physical
set-up is given in Figure  1.  Influent was  sterilized in a
two-liter reservoir and put on line aseptically.  The flow
rate of sterile medium into the reaction vessel was 1
ml/min.  The reaction vessel was a 4-liter  aspirator bottle
(Kimax), which was continuously agitated via a stir bar/stir
motor arrangement  (Corning Hot Plate Stirrer,  PC-351).
Aeration was accomplished via filtered air  (Acropore 0.45-ym
filter) bubbled into the bottom of the reaction vessel.  A
                              928

-------
£
o
z
o
                                                       o
                                                                                  00
                                                                                  •H
                                                               O

                                                               DC
                                                               UJ
                                                               W
                                                               in
                                                               CC   0.
                                                               =:   Q.
                                                               Q   O
                                                               UJ   W
                                                               2
                                                               HI
                                                                 -   •  •  —   m

                                                                             co
                                                               H   UJ  UJ   <
                                                               00

                                                                    <
                                                                I
                                                                    Q.  DC

                                                                    CO  O
CC
o  _
CL  Z
uj  O
J  H
CO  <
 I    I
UJ  U.
                                            929

-------
constant volume of 2 liters was maintained within the reac-
tion vessel by a siphon overflow tube into a waste recept-
acle which was replaced and autoclaved when full. Samples
were taken by suction-draw from the sampling port.

    Inoculum;  The inoculum or seed for the start up of the
chemostat was 0.05 gm each of the following:  dried bacteria
culture (Horizon Ecology Company) for degrading fats, oils
and greases (#245-40), for hydrocarbon degradation in fresh
water (#245-60), and 5 ml of activated sludge from the Buena
Ventura County Water Treatment Plant.

     Media;  Bushnell Haas Broth (Difco) was used as a
minimal salts medium to which specific amounts of known
carbon could be added.  The carbon used in this experiment
were D-Glucose (Difco) and/or the aqueous film forming foam
designated FC-780 (3M) .  This then comprised the sterile
influent.

     Growth conditions:  The chemostat experiment was
conducted at ambient temperature, under mild aeration and
agitation.  pH was monitored but no attempt at adjustment
was made.

     Procedure;  The system start-up was as follows.  The
reaction vessel containing two liters of sterile Bushnell
Haas Broth (BHB), 0.05% Glucose and 0.5% FC-780 was seeded
with the inoculum and allowed to grow as a batch system.
After 48 hours and an increase to 0.60 optical density,
sterile influent containing 0.05% Glucose and 0.5% FC-780
was put on line.  On day 8, the influent was changed to
contain 0.5% FC-780 (approximately 2000 ppm COD) as the only
carbon source.  Samples from influent & effluent concur-
rently, were taken three (3) times per week and analyzed as
follows:

     A.  Turbidity.  Utilizing the sterile influent as a
         standard or blank, turbidity of the effluent was
         determined at 460 nm, utilizing a Beckman Spec-
         tronic 88.

     B.  pH.  The pH of the influent and the effluent were
         determined immediately after sample withdrawal,
         using an Orion Research Model 701A/Digital
         lonalyzer.
                               930

-------
     C.   Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD).   The 5 day BOD
         determination was used as outlined in Section 507
         in Standard Methods (Ref 4),  utilizing an Orion
         Research Model 701A/Digital  ionalyzer and Mode
         97-08-00 02 electrode.

     D.   Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD).   COD was performed
         according to the method outlined  in Section 508 of
         Standard Methods (Ref 4) and modified by Technicon
         (Ref 5).

     E.   Total Organic Carbon (TOG).    A variation on the
         procedure given in Section 505 of Standard Methods
         (Ref 4) was used.  The variation, the acid sparge
         technique, was performed with the Beckman 915B TOC
         analyzer, and is outlined in the  operation manual
         (Ref 6).  All samples used for TOG, COD and/or BOD
         determination were filtered  prior to analysis
         through a series of graded membrane filters, i.e. 5
         ym, 1.2 ym, 0.8 ym and 0.45  pm (Gelman).  Each
         filter was washed prior to use with 30 ml of double
         deionized water to remove any organic wetting agent
         on the filter.

     F.   Microorganism Identification.   Bacterial and fungal
         populations were identified  and enumerated utiliz-
         ing Nalgene Nutrient Pad Kits, of the following
         media:  Standard TTC - for total  counts, Azide -
         for enterococci and fecal streptococcus, Wort - for
         fungi, filamentous and non-filamentous, Weman - for
         slime forming mesophilic bacteria (e.g. Leuconostoc
         mesenteroides).

Rotating Biological Contactor (RBC)

     Physical Set-Up;  A diagram of. the RBC physical set-up
is given in Figure 2. Influent was sterilized and asepti-
cally added to a 20-liter reservoir (5 gal. bottle, Kimax).
The reservoir was then put on line aseptically.  The flow
rate of sterile influent into the aerobic  RBC was 3.5
ml/min,  and was controlled by a peristaltic pump (Cole
Farmer).  The RBC was on loan from the U.S. Army Mobility
Equipment Research and Development Command (USAMERDC), Ft.
Belvoir, VA., and has been described  in detail by them (Ref
3).  Basically, it was a five chambered unit constructed of
Plexiglass.  Each of the first four chambers contained six
                             931

-------
O
O
O
5
CD
CD
                                                                     CO
                                                                  UJ
                                                                  U.  UJ
                                                                          (D
                                                              O  CC
DC  O
                                                                      H-  0-
                                                                          CO
                                                                       I    I
                                                              O  Q  UJ
                                      932

-------
1/4-inch (0..6 cm) thick plexiglass discs, 9-1/2 inches (24
cm) in diameter mounted on a shaft 1/2 inch (1.27 cm) in
diameter.  One hundred and twelve (112) holes, 1/4 inch (0.6
cm) in diameter, were bored into each disc to aid in microb-
ial attachment.  The total disc area was 23.55 ft2 (2.188
m2).  The last chamber was void of discs, acting as a 1-
liter capacity reservoir-clarifier.  The total liquid
capacity of the unit was 14.5 liters.  The discs were
rotated at 17.5 rpm, thus being equivalent to an edge
velocity of 0.73 ft/s (0.22 m/s).  An additional clarifier
was added in the form of a modified Imhoff cone, which was
used to visually measure the amount of sedimentation pro-
duced in a 24 hour period.  Samples were taken from within
all four stages and from the influent.

     Inoculum;  The seed for the start-up of the RBC was one
liter of activated sludge obtained from the Buena Ventura
County Water Treatment Plant, and was inoculated within one
hour of acquisition.

     Media;  BHB was used.  Varying concentrations of
FC-780, D-glucose, and Nutrient Broth (Difco) were added as
outlined in the procedure.

   Growth Conditions;  The RBC experiment was conducted at
ambient temperature. Aeration was accomplished by the
revolution of the discs through the wastewater. pH was
monitored and adjustments were made, using IN NaOH or IN
HCL, when necessary.

     Procedure:  The system start-up was as follows.   The
RBC was filled with 14.5 liters of BHB plus 0.1% glucose,
inoculated with activated sludge and allowed to run as a
static system for 24 hours.  Sterile influent containing
0.1% glucose was fed into the unit at a rate of 3.5 ml/min.
After 2 days it was determined that this mode of addition of
the carbon source was inadequate to maximize colonization of
the discs and so glucose and/or nutrient broth was added to
each stage once daily to a total concentration of 0.1%
carbon.  On day 29, FC-780 was added to the influent at a
concentration of 100 ppm in terms of COD.  The concentration
of FC-780 was gradually increased until a level of 1000 ppm
COD was achieved.  Samples were taken three times per week.
BOD, COD, TOC and pH analysis were performed as described
under the chemostat procedure.  Other parameters measured
were:
                           933

-------
     A.  Temperature.  Readings were taken three times per
         week, utilizing a Wahl digital heat-prober ther-
         mometer.  The thermometer was placed directly into
         each of the four stages of the RBC.

     B.  Microorganism Identification.  Bacterial and fungal
         populations were identified and enumerated utiliz-
         ing:  Nalgene Nutrient Pad Kits — TTC and Wort,
         Bio Stix and Myco Stix test strips (Ames Company)
         and/or Total Count Water Tester (Millipore Corp).
         Microscopic qualitative observations were done
         every 14 days to visually monitor changes in
         predominant populations, i.e. protozoal, fungal,
         and nematodal.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Chemostat

     After 7 days of continuous operation, an apparent
steady state condition was achieved within the chemostat in
terms of COD, TOC and BOD conversion or percent (%) removal
from the supernate.  Approximately 70% COD conversion, 80%
BOD conversion and 60% TOC conversion were consistently
observed from day 11 onward to day 43 (Figure 3).  From day
40 until shut down of the chemostat on day 63, the percent
(%) conversion dropped to approximately 45% COD, 50% BOD and
40% TOC.  This was in part correlated with a rise in the pH
of the reaction vessel to a pH of 7.1 or greater.  The
microbial populations observed in the chemostat changed
drastically with the increase in pH.  That is, a greater
number of yeast and slime-forming bacteria were noted.  No
effort was made to readjust the pH of the chemostat and so
the percent conversion in all three dropped to a level of
40-50% conversion.  It was decided for future experimenta-
tion to adjust the pH of the RBC to 7.00.
     As seen in Figure 3, the percent (%) conversion.values
exhibited some variance.  This is partially due to technical
errors and machine failure.  That is dilution and sampling
errors were committed during a turnover of technical assis-
tance. Equipment failure would occur and no new influent
would enter the reactor vessel for a 12 to 16 hour period.
This would result in microbial back contamination from the
reactor vessel into the influent reservoir, which would
result in an increase in the pH and a decrease in available
                             934

-------
                                                                          CO
                                                                          CO
O
M
O
O
§
co
c

u.
                                                                          
-------
 carbon in the  influent  and  thus  a  lower  TOC,  COD  and BOD
 conversion measurement.   It should also  be mentioned that
 plate  counts were  performed infrequently and  were more for
 qualitative determination of different microbial  popula-
 tions.
     From the  chemostat  data,  it was decided  that enrichment
 for mixed microbial populations, that were able to utilize
 FC-780  as their  sole  source of supplemented carbon, was
 possible.   The data from the chemostat also indicated that
 it was  possible  to change an influent containing  1200 to
 1500 ppm  COD of  FC-780  into an effluent  containing 100-200 '
 ppm COD.

 Rotating  Biological Contactor

     At initial  start-up, 0.2% glucose was added  via the
 influent  to stage  1 of the  RBC at  a flow rate of  4 ml/min.
 This proved to be  too high  of  a  concentration of  glucose in
 that the  pH of the RBC rapidly became acidic  and  was thought
 to endanger the  not yet  well established microbial popula-
 tion. Therefore, the  concentration of added carbon, in the
 form of glucose, was  dropped to  0.1%.  However, the majority
 of this carbon (97%) was used  in stages  1 and 2,  and stages
 3 and 4 failed to  exhibit growth on the  discs.  To achieve
 colonization of  all the  RBC discs, 0.1%  carbon-source, in
 the form  of a  10X  concentrate, was added  to each  stage
 daily.  This also  stopped the  recurring back contamination
 into the  sterile influent reservoir, which now contained BHB
 only.
     It was noted  that the  pH  of the effluents daily dropped
 into the  acidic  range (6.0  - 6.9)  and had to be chemically
 adjusted.  After 3 days, nutrient broth was added in the
 form of a  10X concentrate,  along with the 10X glucose, to
 result  in  a final  concentration  of 0.1%  carbon.   It was
 thought that whereas glucose was metabolized aerobically
 into acids, the  nutrient broth would be metabolized with the
 resulting  release  of amino  groups.   This would help to raise
 the pH, and the  protein  itself would also act as an addi-
 tional  buffer.  This provided adequate pH regulation unless a
malfunction in the equipment or a laboratory error occurred
which resulted in  a decrease in the pH of one or glucose was
metabolized aerobically  into acids, the nutrient broth would
be metabolized with the  resulting release of amino groups.
This would help  to raise the pH,  and the protein itself
would also act as  an additional buffer.  This provided
                               936

-------
adequate pH regulation unless a malfunction in the equipment
or a laboratory error occurred which resulted in a decrease
in the pH of one or more of the stages.
     The resulting reduction in COD, BOD, and TOC are
presented in Figures 4, 5, and 6, respectively.  In these
figures, percent removal is shown with respect to time given
in days.  After 30 days of continuous operation, an apparent
steady state condition was achieved within the RBC, in terms
of COD, TOC and BOD removal.  Approximately 97% removal was
achieved in all three parameters measured.  As seen in
Figure 7, exposure of the RBC to FC-780 began on day 35 with
the addition of 0.025% FC-780, or 100 ppm in terms of COD."
By day 60, 1000 ppm COD of FC-780 was being fed.  Simul-
taneously, the amount of nutrient broth, which was the only
other carbon source after day 52, was lowered to a level of
approximately 500 ppm COD.  This level of carbon was main-
tained until day 80.  The conversion rate at that time was
98% COD, 96% BOD, and 94% TOC.  A one way completely ran-
domized analysis of variance was conducted on each stage
with respect to COD, BOD or TOC.  These results are given in
Table I.

     Table I.  RBC, One-Way Completely .Randomized
               Analysis of Variance Versus Bartlett's  ,
               Variance

Analytical
Form
COD
BOD
TOC
One-Way

F
441.846
175.475
53.871
Analysis

Significance
0.000
0.000
0 . 000
Bartlett

F
34.543
17.659
91.259
1 s Variance

Significance
0.000 .
0.000 •"
0.000
The calculated F
                         ,
                          '
                              value for this test , would-be
3.47.  The values shown in'Table I, being larger than the   .
calculated F, are indicative of a significant variation
between treatment and non-treatment with the RBC. The
Bartlett's test of homogeneous variance indicates no viola-
tion of the homogeneity assumptions of ANOVA.  The signifi-
cance levels show low probability of error within the tests.
                             937

-------
                                          si-


                                           0)
                                           6D

                                          •H
                                     CD
                                     Ifl
                                     *
                                      09
                                      CO
  1-
1-
       o
       \f>
  
-------
                                m
                                00
                               i
                               UJ
939

-------
                                                    G»
                                                    
                                                          CO
                                                    
-------
                                    CO
                                    CM
                                         0)
                                         M
                                         a
                                         W)
                                         CO
                                         i
                                        UJ
                                        z:
                                        1-1
CCOO  Udd
           941

-------
It can be seen from these results that the use of the RBC
was very significant in treating wastewater containing up to
1000 ppm COD of FC-780. .
     Microbial populations observed are given in Table II.
A strong, heterogeneous population was observed throughout
the experiment.  Although some changes in densities
occurred, the organisms listed in Table II were seen
throughout the experiment.

CONCLUSION

     The purpose of this research was to determine the
feasibility of treating wastewater containing aqueous film
forming foam (FC-780) by an aerobic RBC. The preliminary
data presented here demonstrates that FC-780 is conducive to
aerobic bioconversion and removal with a properly adapted
RBC unit.  A significant reduction in COD, BOD and'TOC has
been achieved in synthetic wastewater containing up to 1000
ppm COD of FC-780.  It is possible that FC-780 loading may
be increased further and that higher reduction of the
parameters may be obtained by changes in flow rates and
contact times.  These possibilities are being actively
addressed in preparation of scale up for pilot plant
operation.

     Table II.  Microbial Groupings as Observed on
                Suspended Microscope Slides in the
                Aerobic Rotating Biological Contactor
Nematodes
Fungi
     Filamentous
          Ex: Aspergillus
              Pennicillium
     Non-filamentous
Protozoa
     Sarcodina
     Ciliata
          Ex: Suctoria
              Zoothamnia
              Voticella
              Paramecium
Bacteria
     Gram Positive
          Staphylococci
          Streptococci
          Bacillae
     Gram Negative
          Bacillae
         :Filamentous
            bacillae
Algae
     Phaeophyta
                               942

-------
REFERENCES

1.  Chian, E.S.K., Wu, T.P., and Rowland, R.W.; "Membrane
Treatment of Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) Wastes for
Recovery of AFFF Active Ingredients", Final Report, Georgia
Institute of Technology, October 1980.

2.  LeFebvre, E. E.-, and INMAN, R.  C., "Biodegradability and
Toxicity of Lightwater FC-206 Aqueous Film Foaming Foam",
Report No. EHL (K) 74-26, USAF Environmental Health
Laboratory, Kelly Air Force Base, Texas, November 1974.

3.  Chesler, G. , and Eskelund, G.R., "Rotating Biological
Contactors for Munitions Wastewater Treatment", Report 2319,
U.S. Army Mobility Equipment Research and DeVelpment
Command, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, February 1981.

4.  American Public Health Association, "Standard Methods
for the Examination of, Water and Wastewater", 14th edition,
APHA, Washington, D.C.

5.  Technicon Industrial Systems.  1976.  "TIS Education
Department.  Customer Training Manual."  Technicon
Instruments Corporation, Tarrytown, N.Y.

6.  Beckman.  1979.  "Model 915B Total Organic Carbon
Analyzer."  Beckman Instruments, Inc., Fullerton, CA.
                            943

-------
          OPERATION OF A RBC FACILITY FOR THE TREATMENT
           OF MUNITION MANUFACTURING PLANT WASTEWATER
        Leonard L.  Smith, Senior Technical Engineer,  and
        Wayne C. Greene, Water and Wastewater Engineer,
        Hercules Aerospace Division, Hercules Incorporated,
        Radford Army Ammunition Plant, Radford,  Virginia
INTRODUCTION

     In 1970, the Army initiated an extensive pollution abate-
ment program at all of its ammunition plants.  The treatment
of waste process waters from these plants required development
of new or modifications of existing technology because of the
unique nature of the pollutants in the wastewater. This waste-
water contains ether, alcohol, acetone, inorganic nitrates,
traces of nitroglycerin (NG), and other propellant ingredients,
     The initial wastewater treatment studies(1) were conduc-
ted using an activated sludge process. This study demonstrated
that the activated sludge process was not a feasible treatment
method for the RAAP wastewater due to the high variability in
flow and organic concentrations.   A successful rotating bio-
logical contactor (RBC) pilot plant evaluation(!) was
conducted to define the design parameters and develop the
design criteria for a full-scale facility.

FREATMENT PLANT DESIGN

     A RBC wastewater treatment facility was constructed at
RAAP for the treatment of the process wastewater based upon
                                944

-------
the design criteria developed from the pilot plant evaluation.
This facility consists of a 5110 m3 (1,350,000 gal) equaliza-
tion basin and eight RBC shafts containing a total surface
area of 56,782 m2 (612,000 ft2).  Since the equalization basir
would probably develop a dispersed biological growth, even
without the addition of -nutrients, four 15-hp floating aera-
tors were provided to mix the basin and prevent sedimentation
of suspended solids, and to provide adequate aeration to
satisfy the oxygen uptake rate of the dispersed growth.
     The RBC system (figure 1) was constructed to provide two
separate parallel RBC systems, each 'system consisting of three
stages.  Stage one of each system contains two RBC shafts
while the other stages contain one shaft in each stage.  The
design parameters for the RBC facility are shown in table I.
                Table I.  RBC Design Parameters
                         Flow
                                       Chemical
                                       Oxygen
                                       Demand
                                       (COD)
Biochemical
Oxygen
Demand
(BOD)
                         4716
                         (1,250,000)
Avg Flow Rate - m-Vday
                (gpd)

Design Load - kg/day .
            - (Ib/day)
         «   - mg/1

Avg Hydraulic Loading
           -. - m3/m2.d
   -;        - (gpd/ft2)

Avg Organic Loading
      - kg/1000 m2.d
      - (lb/day/1000 ft2)
Discharge Limitations, maximum
      - Average daily (mg/1)
      - Maximum daily (mg/1)
                                       2140
                                       (4718)
                                       452
856
(1888)
181
                         0.08
                         (2)
                                       37.7
                                       (7.7)
                                       195
                                       290
15.1
(3.1)
60
120
                                945

-------
OQ



CD
CO
o
                                     946

-------
FACILITY  START-UP                                    fl?

     The  facility was placed into operation -during December
1980.  The RBC basins were filled with process wastewater  from
the equalization basin,  3.8'm3  (1000  gallons) of waste  sludge
from a local municipal activated sludge wastewater treatment
plant, and one liter of  phosphoric acid.  The RBC- system was
operated  in a batch mode for eight days to allow a biomass
growth to develop on the. RBC media.   During this time ethyl
alcohol, potassium nitrate, and phosphoric acid were added
each day as nutrients.   Soda ash was  added as required  to con-
trol the wastewater pH.  The initial  wastewater parameters
following start-up were:  pH 8,1, temperature 8 °C (47°F),
dissolved oxygen (DO) 10.8 mg/1, nitrates (N) 14 mg/1,  and
phosphates (P) 4 mg/1.   The biomass growth on the RBC media
developed very > s lowly due to the low  temperature.  Sufficient
alcohol, nutrients, and  soda ash were added each shift  to
maintain the chemical oxygen demand (COD) between 100 . to 200
mg/1, nitrates (N)  5 to  30 mg/1, phosphates (P) 1 to 5 mg/1,
and the pH between 6.5 and 7.8.  On the fourth day of operation
the wastewater temperature increased  to 12 °C (53°F) and a very
noticeable acceleration of biomass growth was observed.
     The RBC operation continued in the batch mode :until the
eighth day, at which time an influent flow of 1.14 m3/min (300
gpm) was started.   The flow rate to. the RBC units was steadily
increased over the next few days \m to 3 m3/min (800 gpm).

pH FLUCTUATIONS                        '

     Shortly after start-up the facility encountered a .period
of pH fluctuations.   During this period,  the influent pH
varied from 5.3 to 10.7  (figure 2).   The variations in the
influent pH were the. result of a new pretreatment facility
being unable to accurately control the acid feed rate for the
pH control system.   Until this problem was corrected, an
attempt was made to adjust the pH in the equalization basin by
the addition of soda ash; however,  due to the. absence of rapid
nix equipment,  this method was not completely successful.
     As a result of. these pH excursions,  most of the biomass
   the RBCs sloughed, off.  However,  the biomass  recovered
without reseeding.

[NITIAL OPERATION     .
     During the next month of .operation,  despite the cold
                   additional PH excursions,  and a highly
                                 947

-------
(O
e
•^
(D

N9
 •H    3
        en
 CD

 OO
                              948

-------
variable organic load, the biomass growth continued to improve.!
The hydraulic loading to the RBC units was maintained constant:
except for adjustments necessary to maintain the equalization :
basin between the 60 to 90 percent level.  However, wide      '•
variations in the organic concentration,of the wastewater     i
caused the COD removal efficiency to consistently fluctuate
between 40 and 80 percent.  Grab samples of the influent and
effluent were collected each .morning, five days a week.
Figure 3 shows the COD of 'these samples collected during the
second month of operation.  The low influent CODs on Monday of
each week were due to no manufacturing operations on weekends.

FULL FACILITY OPERATION                                       !

     In an effort to provide better control of the organic
loading to the RBCs, an on-line total organic carbon (TOG)
analyzer was installed to monitor the RBC influent.  The on-
line TOG analyzer-verified that, even with a one-day retention
time in the equalization basin, sharp fluctuations in the
organic concentrations of the RBC influent were occurring. A
typical shock load caused an increase in TOC of,; 330 percent in
less than three hours (figure 4);  The results of the TOG
analyses over a 23-day period are shown in figure 5.  It was
obvious from these data that a method of controlling the
organic loading to the RBC was needed.  The equalization basin
was designed to be operated at between 60 and 90 percent
Capacity.  Therefore, by maintaining the level of the basin at
the low level when high organic loadings were expected and at
the high level when low organic loadings were expected, the
influent flow rate could be varied to minimize these fluctua-
tions.  A chart was prepared for use by the plant operators
to control the organic loading to the RBC, based upon the
influent flow rate and TOC value (figure 6).  The instructions
provided with the chart were as follows:
     1.  Keep the loading to the RBCs in the same loading zone
whenever possible.  Change the flow rate in small steps when-
ever it is necessary to change zones.
     2.  Decreas.e the basin level during periods of low
organic loadings.  Decrease the level to 60 percent on'Sunday
of each week.
     3.  Increase the basin level during periods of high
organic loadings.  Increase the level to 90 percent on Friday
of each week.
     4.  The operators should maintain a record of the
influent loadings by plotting the changes on the chart, using
a new chart each day, and recording the time of changes.
                                 949

-------
CO
O
TO
TO
O

CO
                           950

-------
                                                          o
                                                          r»


                                                          T
                                                          (O
O
=  3
^  m

£  i
                            951

-------
                             TOC  (mg/l)
                                                        CO
(TO

—I
CD

CJI




5O

CD

O

O
3*
                                   952

-------
1800 -
 1600 -
 1400-
 1200 -
 1000
                                    UNDESIRABLE
                                      LOADING
       UNDESIRABLE
         LOADING
                                            FLOW RATE
                                              (m '/min)
                                                I
FLOW RATE
  (gpm)
 450
   33      50
   100    150
                   100          200     300  TOC
                   300          600     900  COD
               CONCENTRATION (mg/l)
Figure 6   RBC INFLUENT ORGANIC LOADING CHART
                           953

-------
     The use of this chart and the TOG monitor helped control
the organic loadings to the RBCs, but did not eliminate  .
periodic shock loadings.  Figure 7 shows the influent loading
and effluent discharge for a two-month period.  During this
time, both of the RBC systems (eight shafts) were being used
equally.  The data for this chart were from analyses of grab
samples collected at the start of. day shift, five days a week.
Twenty-four hour composite samples are collected once a week
to verify compliance with the discharge permit.  The results
from these analyses show that the facility is meeting the dis-
charge limitations.
     The data from this same period were plotted as COD
applied versus COD removed (figure 8) to determine the COD
removal at various influent loadings.  As can be seen from
this graph, the data appear to be very scattered.  A straight
line represented by the equation y = 0.83 x -0.6 was drawn on
the graph to represent the normal operation of the RBC system.
This corresponds closely to the equation developed during the
pilot plant evaluation^1) of (y = 0.83 x -1.2).  This pilot
plant equation was developed at steady state loadings which
were varied over a period of time from 60 to 90 kg/1000 m2-d
(12 to 18 lb/day/1000 ft2).  The data points on figure 8 fall-
ing considerably below this normal operation line .are indica-
tions of stresses on the system due  to shock loads.

PARTIAL FACILITY OPERATION

     During the period of time the above data were collected,
it can be seen from figures 7 and 8  that the RBC COD loadings
werebelow the average design.loadings of 37 kg/1000 m2-d  (7.7
lb/day/1000 ft2) most of the time.   In order to evaluate  the
facility at design loadings, one RBC system (four shafts) was
shut down in October 1981.  The biomass growth on the RBC's
media became heavier within the first few days of operation of
only one system.  The COD data from  the grab samples, collect-
ed while only one system was operating, are shown in figures 9
and  10.  The COD loadings during  this period fluctuated as
greatly as  in the previous study; however,  it  can be noted
from figure 10 that fewer data points fell  considerably below
the normal  operating line.  It appears  that by increasing the
organic loadings,  thereby causing a  heavier biomass, the
system was more  tolerant  to shock -loads.  A detailed study has
not  been conducted  to determine  the  effects of temperature on
the  organic removal efficiency.   However, during  the last 30
days of this study, the wastewater  temperature varied  from 5°
to 10°C (42° to  50°F).   It was noted by visual inspection
                                954

-------
                    COD  (lb/day/1000  ft )
GO
O
       ISA
5       CO 	
       CD
O .-.
o  a
a  >


55

O
ra
o
CO
CO

o
                                           CJ1
                    COD (kg/1000 m2d)
                      955

-------
                                                Q.
CD
O


i  s
o  o

50  >
    -
    cr
CO  ^x
o  a-
                                                   m.
                                                ^ 5

                                                2 °
                                                o <
                                                o ^

                                                7 °
                                                 N)
m  .«
                            956

-------
                  COD (lb/day/1000

-------
                                „_ n
                                O. 73
                                Q m
                                  2    —
o
m
    >  __k
    m
    Q.  —4
                                 (O
m

00

CO
—4
m
                       o o
11

s\
X   >
       CJ1
                         958

-------
that the colder wastewater 'caused the biomass growth to
increass to compensate for the decreased activity of the
biomass.

CONCLUSIONS

     Based upon the one-year operation of the RBC facility on
the wastewaters from this manufacturing facility, the follow-
ing preliminary conclusions are drawn:
     1.  The biomass on RBC units .can stand extreme stresses
from pH, temperature, and shock organic loads without the
system failing to a degree that it does not recover when the
stress is removed.
     2.  A sudden-increase in organic loading will not immedi-
ately increase the organic removal rate.  However, the biomass
growth will increase rapidly to increase the removal rate. The
biomass growth rate will be directly related to the wastewater
temperature because of the slower growth at lower temperatures.
     3.  Low wastewater temperature does not significantly
decrease the organic removal efficiency at normal operating
levels.  However, at higher organic loadings, the RBC may not
have .the capacity for the additional biomass growth.

REFERENCES

1.  Smith, L. L., and Zeigler, E., Jr., "Biological Treatment
    of a Munitions Manufacturing Facility Wastewater,"
    Proceedings of the 33rd Industrial Waste Conference,
    Purdue University, May 1978, pp. 432-439.
                               959

-------
           TREATMENT  OF  STARCH  INDUSTRIAL WASTE
                         BY  RBCs
        Chun Teh Li  and Huoo Tein  Chen,  Department Of
        Environmental  Engineering, National  Chung Kung
        University,  Tainan,  Taiwan, R.O.C.
        Yeun C.  Wu, Department of Civil  Engineering,_
        University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh,  Pa.

INTRODUCTION

     Although successful  treatment of industrial  wastewaters
by rotating biological contactors (RBC)  has been  earlier re-
ported by many researchers, one important factor  limiting the
plant performance is the availability of oxygen in the system,
in particular, when treating a high-strength organic waste
(1-7).  Oxygen transfer can become more  effective by increasing
the disc rotational speed but this application, however, is
not practical because of: (a) high power consumption, and (b)
high biomass slough-off induced by a high hydraulic shearing
force on the surface of biodisc that reduces the  overall treat-
ment efficiency.
     One alternative that may be able to treat high-strength
organic wastes successfully under the normal operating cond-
itions, is to replace the source of conventional  air by pure
oxygen.  Bintaja et al. first employed oxygen rn  RBC system
for treatment of Cheese waste (8).  Later, Huang  successfully
treated synthetic milk waste by oxygen-enriched RBC system.
                             960

-------
They concluded that use of pure oxygen in sufficient amount
not only was able to improve COD removal satisfactorily but
also increased sludge settleability (9).
     The present study was aimed to investigate the feasibility
of using pure oxygen and conventional air RBC systems for the
treatment of starch processing wastewater and also to study the
effects of wastewater property, organic loading, pH, and dis-
solved oxygen concentration on ,RBC plant performance.  The final
goal of this research was to determine the kinetic data for
future design of both RBC systems.
     Starch Industry Wastewater.  Starch consumption in the
Republic of China (Taiwan) now reaches one hundred thousand
tons annually, of which one half of this demand is supplied by
local manufacturers and the other half is imported from the
outside producers.   As a result, Taiwan government has decided
to assist private daily food industry in expanding the existing
starch processing plants prior to 1984, so that the future
domestic starch demand can be met.
     The raw materials used presently for starch production in
Taiwan are sweet potato and corn.  Approximately 70% of the
total starch is made of sweet potato because it is available
locally.  However, corn starch is more perferably used by
consumers even the cost is higher.  It is predicted that the
use of corn for starch-manufacturing will increase consider-
ably due to the current market demand.
     An expansion of the existing starch processsing facilities
is greatly concerned by environmental scientists and engineers
in Taiwan.  Because  normally each ton of corn used for strach-
making could produce 13.5 - 15.1 kg BOD and, more importantly,
most of the starch manufacturing plants located in Tainan and
Chiayi directly discharged their effluents into the small
receiving streams.  Purification of the pi ant-effluent waste-
waters is essentially necessary.  The present study was initiated
to investigate the treatment of corn strach manufacturer plant
effluent by RBC systems.  The flow diagram as presented later
explains the process employed for corn starch manufacturing.
     It can be seen in the flow diagram that although a closed-
loop system is designed for the purpose of eliminating the dis-
charge of process water, a considerable amount of wastewater
is preduced due to leakage, overflowing, and accidential spill.
Normally, a 0.4 - 3.0 m3 wastewater generated per ton of corn
used was. found in a corn-starch manufacturing plant.
                             961

-------
CORN
  I                  Vapor


-1— stee          r
        SteeBatgr | Evaporated
Dewatering



Drying



Protein


Dewatering
1 Moist
I Stare
Drying
1
Starch
  Flow Diagram of Corn Starch Plant
                962

-------
Biokinetics
     The model employed for this study has been earlier pro-
posed by Monod and Clark et al.(lO,ll).  The basic equations
are given as follows:
V(ds/dt) = Q S0 - Q Se- (ua/Y)
                                             - (US/YS)
                                                      -(1)
in which
                             3
        V = reactor volume, m

    ds/dt = rate of substrate removal, mg/1-sec
                         3
        Q = waste flow, m /day

       S  = influent substrate concentration, mg/1

       S  = effluent substrate concentration, mg/1

       u  = specific growth rate of attached biomass, day
        a                                                 _i
       u  = specific growth rate of suspended biomass, day

       X  = weight of attached biomass per unit disc
        a   surface area, g/m2

       X  = concentration of suspended solids, mg/1
        s                        2
       A  = total disc surface, m
        w
       Y  = yield coefficient of attached biomass
            (mass of biomass produced in kg/ mass of
            substrate removal in kg)

       Y  = yield coefficient of suspended biomass
        s   (mass of biomass produced in kg/ mass of
            substrate removal in kg)

      In the fixed-film RBC  system, substrate removal  by
attached biomass is much greater than suspended biomass.  So,
it  is reasonable to assume  that the term  (US/YS)  xs v in
Eq.  1 can  be  eliminated. And then Eq, 1 becomes
  v(ds/dt)  =  Q  SQ  -  Q
                                 -  (ua/Y)
•(2)
                              963

-------
     According to Monod, the change in biomass under sub-
strate limiting condition can be expressed as
                      = um { S/ (Ks + S)}
  (3)
in which
                                                     -1
               u  = maximum specific growth rate, day

               KS = half saturation constant, mg/1

               S  = limiting substrate concentration,
                    mg/1

     Eqs 2 and 3 can be combined under a steady-state
condition (ds/dt)= 0 and expressed in linear form as shown
below.
                  1A = (K/e) (1/S ) + 1/e
•(4)
in which

               X = (Q/AW)(S0 - S*)» mg/m2-day

               e = (u /Y) X*  mg/1-day
                *          a
               S = effluent substrate concentration
                *  at steady-state condition, mg/1
               X = attached biomass concentration at
                   steady-state condition, mg/1

     The values of K  and e can be calculated by plotting
1/x versus 1/S .  The ordinate intercept and slope of
the line are equal to 1/e and KS/B, respectively.
Materials and Methods
     The chemical composition of the starch processing waste-
water employed for this study is shown in Table  1.  Apparently,
organic carbon concentration as BOD or COD and solids content
were high and the wastewater pH was in the acidic condition.
     Throughout the entire study, the BOD, COD,  pH, DO were
monitored in each stage of the RBC system.  The  laboratory
procedures used to determine the above mentioned parameters are
specified*in "Standard Methods" (12). The % oxygen content in
feed gas was measured in each stage of the pure  oxygen RBC
                            964

-------
system by Beckman Oxygen Analyzer.
                Table 1.  General Property of the Wastewater
          Parameter
Concentration, mg/1
          BOD

          COD

          Organic-N

          Total Solids

          Total Volatile Solids

          PH
          BOD/N ratio

          N/P ratio
 2,700-3,900

 5,200-7,100

   300-400

 3,300-5,400

 2,900-4,700

 4.05-4.55

 10:  1

 5:   1
     Two RBC pilot plants were constructed identically in size.
The main difference between them was that the biodiscs in one
system were exposed to air and in other system they were
constantly contacted with pure oxygen.  The physical structure
of these pilot plants is described in Table 2.
     A total of 47% disc area was submerged and all discs were
supported by a common shaft in each stage.  Three shafts in
each system were driven by the same motor so that they were
rotated at the same velocity.  However, this motor enabled to
rotate at the speed varying from 0 to 200 rpm.
     To produce an airtight condition for pure oxygen RBC
system, a plexiglass cover was bolted down at the top of each
biological reactor.  The shaft was made of a V steel rod that
was connected to motor drive system through the shaft holes
at where h" 0-rings were poisitioned.  Replacement of 0-rings
was necessary when they were worm down from friction.  The re-
                              965

-------
         Table 2. Pilot Plant Specifications
(1)







Biodiscs

Diameter, cm
Thickness, cm
•Spacing, cm
Number
2
Effective area, m
% Submerged area

1st
26
0.2
4
18
1,894
47
Stage Number
2nd
26
0.2
2.8
25
2,630
47

3rd
26
0.2
2.2
31
3,261
47
(2) Reactor
      Material
      Cress Sectional  Area.
      Length, cm
      Volume, liters
        Gross
        Net
(3) Enclosure
      Material
      Size, cm
      Volume, liters
                               Plexiglass Piste
                                  260 x 405
                            760       760
                            25.27
                            24.40
25.27
24.00
760

25.27
23.70
                                plexiglass cover
                                750 x 250 x 150
                             39       38.6      38.2
* in the pure oxygen system only.
                      966

-------
     actor structure is presented  in  Figure  1  in  detail.   All  experi-
     ments, were performed at a room temperature - 28 ± 2°C.
                      50
160
 cm
50
cm
     Pure 0?
     In
Wastewater
   In
            30  30
260
 cm
                                                      Effluent
                                                      to  next
                                                      stage
                                                                 O E
                                                                 LT) O
                                                                 LO E
                                                                 tn o
                                                                 O E
                                                                 01 o
     30   30
              Figure  1.  Structure  of Pure Oxygen RBC
                                967

-------
Results and Discussion
     To study the feasibility of using the RBC systems for
the treatment of starch manufacturing wastewater, the effects
of influent substrate concentration, organic loading, DO,
pH, disc rotational speed (RS), and hydraulic retention time
(RT)on substrate removal efficiency were investigated.
    (1). Disc Rotational Speed. Antonie earlier suggested
that the rotational speed of biodiscs should be controlled
to exceed one foot per second (18.3 m/min.) so that oxygen
limitation could be avoided (8).  The effect of disc rotation-
al speed on treatment efficiency was tested under the influent
substrate concentration ranged from 370 mg/1 to 1,300 mg/1
as BOD and from 860 mg/1 to 2,900 mg/1 as COD.  The rotation-
al speed was controlled at 15, 20, and 25 rpm, respectively.
     Table 3 summarized the results of this study conducted in
the pure oxygen RBC system.   It was found that for all substrate
conditions presently investigated, neither BOD nor COD
removal was significantly increased due to the increase in
disc rotational speed.  In other words, there is no need to
maintain the rotational speed over 15 rpm (12.3 m/min.),
according to the present study.
                Table 3. Effects of Influent Substrate
                         Concentration and Disc Rotational
                         Speed on % COD and BOD Removal
Influent
LUU tone.
(mg/1)
860
1,580
1,900
2,300
2,900

% Reduction
Rotational Speed,
15
91.9
94.6
93.0
88.3
87.2
20
91.4
94.3.
93.6
90.7
87.8

rpm
25
91.6
94.0
93.0
91.0
88.3
                               968

-------
                     Table  3.  Continued
Influent
BOD Cone.
(mg/1 )
370
650
900
1,000
1,300

'% Reduction

Rotational Speed, rpm
15
99.1
98.9
98.0
97.1
96.2
20
99.2
98.7
98.2
98.0
96.5
25
99.0
98.5
98.4
98.0
96.8
     (2).  pH Level.  To obtain an optimum treatment efficiency,
the acidic starch wastewater was first neutralized by NaOH and
then mixed with KH2P04 solution to increase buffering capacity.
The pH level after adjustment was controlled to be within the
range of 8.1 to 8.9.  Because of the chemical nature of the
wastewater, the pH was reduced approximately one unit during
12 hours storage.  Normally, the higher the organic content in
the wastewater the faster the pH drop.  For this reason, the
pH of the feed solution was adjsuted in accordance with COD
concentration.  Table 4 shows the results of pH changes in the
feed as well as in each stage of the RBC systems.
     The data as seen in Table 4 indicated that in most cases
the reduction of pH occurred in the first stage of the system
and an increase was found in the subsequent stages.  The pH
drop was probably due to the accumulation of organic acids
resulted from active decomposition of organic substances where-
as the pH increase was induced by CO? production, a metabolic
by-product in this case.  Additionally, the present study shows
that the influence of substarte concentration, rotational speed,
and retention time on pH was not significant.
                                969

-------
It Is eyident fro.m this study that the buffer solution added
to the wastewater is adequate to maintain a proper pH between
7,0 and 7,6.  However, it i$ important to investigate whether
the chemical addition of phosphate buffer can be reduced, and to
determine its minimum requirement.  Further study is essentially
needed for the future operation of the RBC system.
          Table 4.  Effect of Influent COD, Disc
                    Rotational Speed, and Hydraulic
                    Retention Time on pH
RBC
System
Operating Condition




COD Rotational Retention
mg/1 Speed, rpm Time,
Oxygen 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
12
12
12
12
12
6
6
6
6
6
4
4
4
4
hrs
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
PH Val
ue


Stage Number
Feed*
3/6.
5/6.
8/6.
8/8.
9/7.
2/7.
3/7.
5/7.
7/7.
9/7.
1/7.
4/7.
6/7.
8/8.
5
7
7
3
8
1
6
6
3
9
4
3
5
0
1st
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
6.
6.
6.
6.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
1
3
2
0
1
9
9
9
7
0
6
1
1
0
2nd
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
6.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
2
4
3
1
5
9
1
1
1
1
6
2
3
1
3rd
7.4
7.5
7.5
7.2
7.6
7.0
7.3
7.2
7.4
7.4
7.6
7.3
7.6
7.3
                               970

-------
                     Table 4. Continued
DDP
KbL
System
Oxygen



Operating Condition



' ' c
COD Rotational Retention
mg/1 Speed, rpm Time, hrs Feed*
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
20
20
25
25
12
12
12
12
8.4/6.4
8.9/6.8
8.9/7.2
8.9/8.4
pH Value
tage
1st
7.4
7.3
7.5
7.1
Number
2nd
7.3
7.4
7.6
7.2
3rd
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.2
* (initial pH/pH after 12 hrs storage)

     (3).  Oxygen Consumption and DO Level,  the effect of
organic loading on oxygen consumption and DO level under dif-
ferent disc rotational speeds (15, 20, and 25 rpm) was studied
for both air and pure oxygen RBC systems.  The results are
shown in Table 5.
     A. In Pure Oxygen RBC System.  The feed gas contained 99.5%
oxygen and the feed rate was constantly controlled at 1,000 cc/
min..  Table 5 clearly shows that the % 02 gas remaining and the
% 0? utilization decreases as the number of RBC stages increases.
But the influence of organic loading on oxygen utilization is
different, that is the % Consumption increases or the %' 02
remaining decreases when tne organic loading increases.  These
results are expected because: (a) the removal of organic substrate
takes place rapidly in the first stage of the RBC system that
consumes more oxygen, and (b) in addition to the oxygen uptake
in each stage, the accumulation of C02 reduces the % 02 remain-
ing in the feed gas.
     The DO level in the oxygen RBC system was highly affected
by the influent substrate condition.  In two cases presently
investigated, the DO level reached zero in the first stage as
the influent COD and organic loading exceeded 5,000 mg/1 and
95 g. COD/m2-day, respectively, in accordance with Table 6, Add-
itionally, it was also found that the DO level increased as the
number of RBC stages increased.
                              971

-------
    Q)
    S-
4J
 re  c
 s-  o
.»-> -r-
 C +J
 cu  re
 o  N
 cu =3 .;-

 re  c E
 &-  cu cu
4->  C7>4->
 to  >> w
J3  X >,
 =J O CO
to
    c o
M- O CO
 o    cc
    cn
•<-><= c
 O -r- CU
 cu TD cn
<4-  re >>
«t-  O X
UJ _J O
LO

 CD
r—

 re
C
o
'•£ "O
re s- s-
N CU CO
.— .0

43 Z E
13 CM
CU
O. cr
o re 4->
^S 4-» CO
CO i—l

CT S- T3
E CU S-
•i- £) CO

CU CU CM
rv ri"
ojre
O 4-> CO
&S CO i-H

cn re
E -o
•i- i
o -ooj
o re S
—l cn


E
CU r—
3 0 ^
i— O cn
«r- 0 E
E
re
O T3
•r- CU E
4-5 CU Q.
re o. s.
4-> CO
c?


[^
•
o

^.
*
T-H


i— 1
•
f-
CO
*
o
CTI
o
i-H
^J.
•
OJ
CTi



CTi
T-i




o
o
o

I— 1



LO
I-H




o

r— <

^
•
t-H


f*^
•
LO
CO

o
CO
l-H
CT>
CO

OJ
CTI



CTi
t— 1




§
o

t— 1



o
CM




ID

0

O

OJ


CTI

o
CM
•
CO
CO
CO
LO
•
CO
CO



CO
CO




o
0
o

OJ



LO
i-H




1^,
•
o

^
•
r-i


f^Hfc
•
cn
«^.
•
s.
CO
i-H
CO
CO
CO
*
CTi
CO



CO
CO




o
o
o
ft
OJ



o
OJ




LO
•
o

LO
•
OJ


LO
•
OJ
^
•
IO
CO
i-H
CO
LO

cn
CO



CO
CO




o
o
o
rt
CM



LO
OJ




CTi
•
o

CT)
•
1— I


LO
*
CO
CM
•
co
CO
i-H
CO
o
•
LO
CO



p*^
LO




o
CD
o
*t
CO



LO
I-H




t-H
•
t-H

CO
•
i-H


^^
•
CM
CTI
•
CO
CO
o
LO
CO
CO

ID
CO



p^
LO




o
0
o
ft
co



o
OJ




r^
•
o

CO
•
OJ


CTI
•
CM
LO
•
co
CO
co
CO
LO
•
LO
CO



l"x.
LO




o
0
o
rt
co



LO
OJ




CM
•
t-H

p^
•
r- 1


1—*
•
s
LO
•
CM
CO
r--
co
CO
«3"
•
LO
CO



LO
r^




o
o
o
*t
"^



LO
t-H




LO
•
t-H

LO
•
OJ


LO
•
LO
o
•
cn
•*
i-H
CO
0

^.
CO



LO
CTi




o
o
o
rt
LO



LO
l-H










. 1
CO

•H
I, 1
cu
JS
JJ

o
4J
C
•H
18
"u
fl)

"3
w
s

CO

fcC
13
GJ
o
m
£
fl)
00
>>

tn

o*\
o\

<
                                                                                                     W)
                                                                                                     n)
                                             972

-------
          Table 6.  Effects of Substrate Concentration
                    and Loading on DO Level in Oxygen
                    and Air RBC Systems
Influent
COD
mg/1
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
7,000
COD
Loading
2
g/m -day
19
38
57
76
95
133
1
Oxygen RBC
stage number
1st 2nd 3rd
8.5 19.3 21.6
6.0 20.3 18.0
4.2 13.0 16.0
1.5 9.8 12.0
0 6.0 9.0
0 0.2 0.5
2
Air RBC
stage number
1st
4.6
1.6
0
0
0
0
2nd
8.0
4.0
1.5
0
0
0
3rd
8.6
7.5
5.0
0
0
0
 1. Disc rotational speed= 15 rpm
 2. Disc rotational speed= 20 rpm


     B. In Air RBC System.  The effect of substrate concent-
ration and loading on DO level in the conventional air system
is similar to the pure oxygen system.  However, the DO levels
for all three stages in the air RBC system were considerably
lower.  An anaerobic condition was found in the first stage
of the system when the organic loading was equal to 57 g. COD/
m2-day and in all stages when the organic loading exceeded
76 g. COD/m2-day.
     Biological response to oxygen deficiency in RBC systems
shows no significant difference from the other types of waste-
water treatment processes.  Two interesting evidences have
been observed, one is the conversion of sulfate compounds
                            973

-------
     CO
•—»  o
a*  o

DO  i—
O  o
O  P*
     CL
    CQ

     o
     o
O  0»
o  o.
o  -.

70 CQ
P>
ro
vo
o
o
en
i-*
VO
en
en
en
t-»
eo
00
»-J
en
co
o
VJ
t-t
00
00
1—"
ID
CO
ro
i— '
00
en
•
t—>
t-»
ro
en
en
ro
en
t-*
00
ro
co
en
0
*>
CO
o
o
-e»
-p.
-vj
CO
I—"
VJ
Cn
CO
co
en
ro
i— >
-e»
i—"
•-J
CO
ro
t— >
00
i-t
en
•£*
I—"
00
00
Cn
en
00
en
ro
t-*
t— •
00
§
CO
ro
CO
o
CO
-P»
ro
en
ro
CO
CT>
*>
-P»
^
ro
VO
vo
ro
ro
>-j
CO
H-*
CD
1— »
CTi
O
t— «
«-J
en
CO
CO
1— '
vj
CO
en
t— '
-P»
>-j
o
ro
CTi
.£»
O
ro
~-j
<
en
o
ro
Cn
en
en
en
en
o
o
ro
CO
ro
ro
-P»
o
4=«
-P»
I—"
O
•>J
00
V£>
^
CO
-&
00
1— >
co
co
en
ro
CO
CO
0
ro
en
^
*»
en
ro
en
en
•^i
00
en
ro
en
ro
^i
ID
ro
en
i— >
en
t— «
en
-P>
l£>
t— '
O
00
en
t— *
i—"
i— '
ro
CD
ro
0
t— >
0
ro
i— >
^
CO
CO
ro
en
2
CO
en
h->
ro
en
•£>
i-j
^j
-£>
ro
i-*
o>
•^j
VO
CO
co
CO
en
CO
i— *
O
vo
o
i— >
I
ro
o
•>j
CO
CT>
i— '
en
CO
en
••j
CT>
CO
t-»
en
o
i— >
en
en
ro
*e
en
CO
<£>
f*
0
CO
en
en

-e»
00
o
00
en
en
vo
i— •
i— *
en
-t>
en
VO
o
^j
CO
ro
-d
cf>
ro
CO
H-»
i— '
vo
i— '
•*j
£
CO
00
•^1
CO

4*
en
CD
CO
ro
CD
CO
^
l~>
en
«k
cr»
VO
i— •
en
CO
ro
vo
•»j
o
ro
vo
CD
CO
•— «
o^
£
vo
CO
•~J
*>

co
-P»
o
^J
en
o
en
en
i— «
-e»
-P>
en
CO
CO
CO
CO
ro
•c»
-»j
^
CO
t-»
I—1
en
CO
O
vo
•vj
ji
CO
VO
0

03 C
o :
o e
o ec
o *•
o -
<£)
•^ r
ro o
1 C
CL -
,EU =
*< 1C
3- -
3 1

>—>


O
3


5 3
'?
fD
! S
•Sfc
_f
O
".g
» Cu
i. 3
J* ~J»
5 O
5 *
Retentior
T-I mrt




6*1
§
5
sf
sfr




                                                                               CO
                                                                               o
                                                                               n>
       cr

       ro
 3  ft)  -h
vo  3  -h
 to  o  co
    <  o
 O)  fit  r+
                                                                                        n>  CL 73
                                                                                        rt- CD  CO
                                                                                        ro  -s  o

                                                                                        rf < CO
                                                                                        _>. oj  c+
                                                                                        O  -5  SU
                                                                                        3  — ••<£)
                                                                                           o  ro
                                                                                        ro
                                                                                           o
                                                                                           •s  co
                                                                                          eo  c
                                                                                           o>  cr
                                                                                           3  CO

                                                                                           o'-s
                                                                                              D>
                                                                                           P" r+
                                                                                           o  ro

                                                                                           Q.
                                                974

-------
t— " 1— "
VO Cn
O VO
O O
co (o
en I—.
O O
o 5
•vl Cn
ro -p»
ro ro
i—1 •-•
CO 1—
CO >4
0 00
Cn Cn
CO CO
!-• 10
cn cr>
•**. ^»
ro co
en 5.
*-• fo
*» co
cn co
CD CO
co ro
>-> ro
CJ !-•
co en
Cn «vl
ro *>
^o *»
£ 0
•vj CO
>>l CD
Cn VG
CO OC
cn a*
*» vo
\O 4k
(-•
O
vj
0
1— >
00
8
-C*
o
««J
•>4
H- »
oo
Cn
ro
t— >
cn
§
O\
cn
0
o
00
•»J
CO
ro
*»
i
 •-•
^1 4k
§ s
co co
CO I—*
Co ro
s s
o o>
Cft Cfi
ro tn
ro en
i—i t— '
ro tn
en ro
«-• >4
>~j >j
co ro
ro ro
ro S
O 00
cr> en
O o
0 0
^ CO
0) 4k
^J t—
V£) \o
co co
CO O
§|£
^^
00 CO

cn
en
o
I
ro
O
vo
(«)
>j
ro
o>
en
en
en
cn
t-f
O
VJ
t— '
-t»
i
00
en
C3
o
ro
CO
co
VD
co
en
i
CO
ro ro
en ro
0 0
0 0
-p» *»
en i-«
•C» co
0 0
t—i i—*
*» ro
ro en
en *.
ro ro
cn co
CD cn
CO •£>
4* *»
>-> t— •
ro en
o vo
»-•
VO H->
^J O^
t— • i— •
en co
en cn
^—'
ro vo
ro O"!
ro ro
-P» cn
«vi vo
ro ro
ro -P»
ro ro
-P* 4»
-fa. CTl
O CO
CO CO
co vo
co cn
i— •
vo
co
O
CO
en
cn
0
i— '
i— '
0
5
ro
o
ro
vo
-P»
i— •
CO
•^J
I—"
-ti
1— •
t— '
en
co
i— '
en
•^j
co
o
o
ro
-P»
O
en
t— '
CO
5
vo
t— 1
-e>
to
en
ro
•vi
CO
o
CD
en
ro
i-»
en
CO
cn
-c»
ro
VO
^
ro
CT»
co
ro
en
vj
ro
ro
-p»
ro
vo
en
"v.
ro
^»
en
Oi
co
ro
en
&>
00
i-» i— '
ro i-«
^j cn
0 0
ro ro
CO O
•^J CO
o o
-•j en
ro cn
•o i—
i— ' i—"
CO t->
cn co
t-> cn
-p> «>
ro co
vo ro
H- 00
ro ro
ro >-j
CO VO
ro ro
CO CO
co ro
-v» -v.
ro ro
en ro
-J ^j
en en
ro i-»
VO CO
CO CO
en i->
CO O
*vi ^j
*» cn
£ ^
cn cn
ro >-•
vo cn

cn
en
o
t— •
t— •
VO
o
CO
»>J
I— »
cn
«>i
CO
-e>
*>
«vl
*>l
CO
-p»
en
ro
CO
en
ro
no
ro
cn
t— '
tn
co
•vi
tn
CO
^
cn
^4
o
cn

ro
cn
en
-P»
CO
O
i— '
en
i— •
ro
V4
•P*
-e»
-P»
tn
co
co
cn
ro
*>j
cn
co
i— •
o
ro
CO
cn
cn
ro
tn
vo
ro
en
2
.p.

CO O
O S
0 0
•
O 3
O VQ
0 *•>
VQ
^^ r~
3 0
ro a>
I O
Q. -•
Q> 3
<< VQ

3- 3
CO CD

I— •
(/)
rt-


ro 3
3 cr
Q. n>
-«j
o
-t>
co
ft-
o>
IO.
eo n>
2.

o
CD
2


> i— i
3
-h
_J
fD
r+
j
o
" vQ
DJ
3
. -"•
• n
)f

Retention




a*
;o
ro
o
<
ta
*





                             ro
                             o

                             3
                             (0
                             fD
                             3
                             CO

                             O
                             fD
                                    cr

                                    n
                                    o
                                    o
                                    fD

                                    Q.
975

-------
co   ro

vo   vo
                                                  co  ro   ro  ro
 8
          _   vo  o
          oo   ro  ro
     oooooocncnoo
 •"«J  en   co  co
                                    ro   vo
                                    o   o

                                    en   *fc
 8
                  co   10
                                en  vo
                                oo  en
 s
                                             00   I—'
                                                               8


                                                               CO
                                                               •
                                                               00
     en   co  co  »-»
                                                  en  o   O
 co  O  en
 4a»  ro  vo
                  co  cr>
                       CO  CO  CO  I-"
                                o  oo
                                                           en  vo
          ro  •—«  »-«   t-f
          en  'io  oo   .r*
          vo  »-•  ci   «sj


          OD  40  CO   O
rocouiuivovovovovovovot—>t—>roro
                            >
en  co  co  o

•P*  i-«  en  ro
                                    .
cnvororocooooooooiNJOo-tj
cncncnroroco
                                rorocoro.c»i\jroro
                                                 rvs
                                                          ro
     CO  CO  I—>   !-<
CD   o  oo  -vj  oo  i-»

O   o  o  .j-*  o  en

«-•       en  INJ  ro  co
^J   7^  en  o  en  ro

^   vo  4*  lo  co  o
OooooovovDvovDvovDvovocncno^*^!
inpovoo>Nivoi->co

ovovot-'rococovoocorovDvocooo
"J   -vj  Co
Oo   vo  en

co   en  en
                 oo   vo  vo   vo  vo   vo  vo
co   ro  co

co   co  o   en
                  ro  ro
    2  es  g   2
                                        •*»   vo
                                                              Cn

                                                              CO
                                                          en  Co
                                                                                     ro
                              00—-
                                                                      o  3
                                                                      O  U3 Ct
                                                                                    vo
                                                                                    (D
                                                                     300«
                                                                       ro n» 3
                                                                     i   a.--.
                                                                         -•• o
                                                                                           n
                                                                     ro
                                                                     co
                                                                         n>
                                                                        oo
                                                                        Pi-
                                                                        o>
                                                                       CQ
                                                                        ro
                                                  976

-------
  to an offensive Hj>S gas and the other is the overgrowth of
  filamentous microorganisms, that reduces the sludge settle-
  ability.   Unfortunately, no identification of thread-like
  organisms was obtained from the present study.
       (4)  COD and BOD Removal  As a Function of Substrate and
  Loading Conditions.   The effect of influent substrate  con-
  centration and organic loading on R3C plant performance was
  investigated at the disc rotational  speed equal  to 15  and 20
  rpm,  respectively,  for the conventional  air and  pure oxygen
  system.   The results of the study were summarized  in Table
  7.
      It is apparent  from Table 7 that the % COD or  BOD  removal
  is  highly dependent upon the  system  operating conditions.
  In  general,  the lower the influent COD or BOD concentration
  and organic  loading  the higher the % substrate removal.   The
  permissible  organic  loading and retention  time for 90%  BOD and
  80% COD removal  are  estimated for both  RBC systems  as follows-
System

Oxygen


Air
% Removal
BOD
90
90
90
90
COD
80
80
80
80
Retention Organic Loading
Time, hrs g./m2-day

4
6
12
6
BOD
19.0
31.0
38.0
28.0
COD
49.0
70.0
110.0
62.3
     To meet the above requirements, the oxygen RBC system
was perferably operated under a retention time between 6
and 12 hours.  At the retention time of 6 hours, the oxygen
RBC system can be loaded at approximately 9.6% on COD basis
and 11% on BOD basis higher than the conventional air system.
Additionally, it was also found that in the oxygen system, the
organic loading rate at 6 hours retention time was 30% and
38% higher than at 4 hours, respectively, for 80% COD and 90%
BOD removals.
     The net % reduction of COD and BOD from each stage of
the RBC systems were also reported in table 7.  It was •
observed that when the organic laoding was low (i e   BOD
load < 19.6 g./m2-day and COD load<43.9 g./m2_day), effective
                               977

-------
removal of BOD and COD was obtianed in the first stage of RBC.
The subsequent stages become important as a result of increasing
the organic loading or shortening the hydraulic retention
time.  The overall treatment efficiency as a function of BOD
or COD loading is illustrated in Figures 2 and 3.
     The relationship between organic loading and substrate
removal per unit surface area per time is shown in Figures 4
and 5.  A linear relationship was found for the conventional
air system when the organic loading was below 60 g. BOD or
COD/ m2-day, and for the pure oxygen system as the loading was
not in excess of 70 g. BOD or COD/m2-day.  The equations used
to describe the above mentioned  relationship are given as
        Air RBC System:
              $ = 0.8 + 0.82 to, if to < 60 g/m -day

        Oxygen RBC System:

              $ = 2.8 + 0.79 03  if co < 70 g/m -day
•(5)
•(6)
 in which

              $ = Organic  Removal  in g COD or BOD removed/
                  m2-day
                                                    2
              to = Organic  Loading  in o COD or BOD/m -day

      Figures 4 and 5 also show that the predicted organic
 removal efficiency $ calculated from Eqs. 5 and 6 exceeds the
 observed values when the organic  laoding w was greater than
 the limits already mentioned.
      (5) Foamino and Brdiging.  Throughout the entire stuay,
 foaming never occurred in the pure oxygen RBC system but it
 was a serious problem in the conventional air RBC system
 (see Figures 6 and 7).  It was found that the first stage
 of the conventional air system was covered by foam at the
 organic loading equal to  38 gCOD/m2-day.  When the loading
 was increased to exceed 50.2 g. COD/mz-day, the operation
 of both first and second  stages of the RBC system was inter-
 ferenced.  The low efficiency of  the conventional  air RBC
 system could be partially caused  due to the foaming that
 resulted  in a low oxygen  transfer to attached biomass.
      The  maximum thickness of the biofilm was approximately
 equal to  2.5 cm on the first-stage  biodiscs of the pure oxygen
                              978

-------
                            5
                            s
                            o
  I
 g

 aoo
979

-------
                        §
         s
ooa
980

-------
120
100
O BOD data
9 COO data
  RS= 20 rpm
 «r
 60
 40
 20
            20
                     40
                               60
                                        80
                                                 100
                                                           120
                                                                    140
                                                                             160
                               a, g COD or BOD/m -day
                   Figure 4.  Realtionship Between Organic  Loading
                              and Substrate Removal  Efficiency  In
                              Air RBC System
                                     981

-------
120
100
 80
 60
 40
 20
          O BCD data
          9 CCD data
           RS= 15 rpm
                               60
                          Figure 5.
                                        80
                                                 100
                                                           120
                                                                    140
                                                                             160
                                     u, g COD or BOD/m -day
Relationship Between Organic  Loading
and Substrate Removal  Efficiency In
Oxygen RBC System
                                     982

-------
Figure 6. Foaming Problem in Air RBC System
Figure  7.  Disappearance of Foaming Problem In
           Pure Oxygen  RBC System
                  983

-------
  RBC system.  No  biomas,s  bridging was  found.   This  result  means
  that 4" disc spacing  presently  provided  for  the  first  RBC stage
  can be reduced to  increase the  disc number as well  as  the disc
  surface area.  By  doing  s-o,  the organic  loading  can also  be
  reduced to increase the  treatment efficiency.
       Determination of 3  and  K .  Eq.  4 was used  to  calculate
  the values of 3  and K by plotting (1/x) against (1/S*) (see
  Ffgures 7 and 8).  The 3 and K  values obtained  from the  above
  calculations were  summarized in Table 8  as follows:

                Table  8.   3  and  K  Values
Parameter
Ks, mg/1
3, mg/l-day
Air RBC System
BOD Basis
151.4
58.8
COD Basis
890.4
153.8
Oxygen RBC System
BOD Basis
10.9
31.7
COD Basis
432.0
117.6
     By substituting 3 and K  values into Eq. 4, four RBC kinetic
models are formed
        Air RBC System:
             —  = 2.574 (1/S ) + 0.017  on BOD basis
        Q(so-s )
                                                        •(7)
           Aw                 *
                  = 5.783 (1/S ) + 0.0065 on COD basis
        Q(so-s )
                                                        •(8)
                                  984

-------
      1,600
      1,400   -
      1,200   -
S    1,000   -
        aoo  -
                                                               •  Pure Oxygen  RBC System

                                                               O  Air RBC  System
        600  -
                                                                                            4000
                                              1/S , 1/mg x 10
                                     Figure 7. Determination of B and K  On
                                               BOD Data Basis          s
                                              985

-------
    700.
    600
    500
I"  400
1

«  300
••*.



    200




    100
.0065
  = 0.0085
  J	I
                                              O  Air  RBC System

                                              •  Pure Oxygen RBC System
                                                                         I
                                                                                  I
                20
                         40
                                   60
                                            80
                                                     100
                                                              120
                                        1/S   1/mg x 10'
                                                       ,-4
                            Figure 8. Determination of e and K  on
                                      COD Data Basis
                                                                        140
                                                                                 160
                                                                                          180
                                             986

-------
         Oxygen RBC System:
              V                *      •     •
               W     = 0.344 (1/S ) + 0.0315 on BOD basis
          Q(so- s
                                                       •(9)
              A.           ••*"'••
                     = 3.673 (1/S ) + 0.0085 on COD basis
          Q(so- s
                                                       •(10)
Conclusions
     The following conclusions were formulated as a result of
this study:                                     .
     1. Proper pH control is essentially required for the
treatment of this acidic wastewater.  By adjusting the waste-
water pH to nearly 9.0, the final effluent pH after passing
through three RBC stages would be within the range of 7.0-
7.6.  The pH control was made by the addition of NaOH along
with phosphate buffer.
     2. In the pure oxygen RBC system, the disc rotational
speed did not significantly affect the results of % COD or
BOD removal, oxygen consumption, pH and DO level in each
RBC stage.  At the constant rotational speed of 15 rpm (12.3
m/min.), the RBC plant performance was closely related to
the influent substrate concentration and organic loading as
well,
     3.  Both air and pure oxygen RBC systems are capable of
removing COD and BOD sufficiently.   The COD and BOD removals
were more than 90% when the organic loading in the conventional
air system was below 28 g. BOD/m2-day and 62.3 g.  COD/m2-day
or it was less than 38 g. BOD/mz-day and 110 g. COD/m2-day in
the pure oxygen system.  From the present study, it was found
that the latter system was possible to be operated at the
organic loading 1.7 times higher than the former system if
the efficiency of the RBC plant in terms of BOD removal equaled
80%.  In general, the reduction of organic substrate was
high in the first RBC stage when the organic loading was below
19.4 g. BOD/m -day in both systems.  However, the subsequent
                           987

-------
stages become important after the organic loading condition       :
exceeding the above value.
      4.  The values of g and K  in Eq. 4 are obatinable.  It
is apparent from the present stady that the pure oxygen RBC
system has lower e and K  as compared to the conventional air
RBC system on both BOD and COD data basis.
      5. Two serious problems which may occur during the operation;
of RBC systems are: (a) foaming and (b)septic environment.  The
foaming problem started at the organic loading = 38 g. COD/m2-day
and the anaerobic suitation was developed at the loading equal or
greater than 57 g. COD/m2-day in the conventional air RBC system.
Although no foaming problem was found in the pure oxygen RBC
system, the septic condition occurred in the first stage at the
organic loading = 95 g. COD/m2-day.  Poor sludge settling charact-
eristics was resulted from the overgrowth of thread-like organisms
under anaerobic condition.
References

1.  Birks, C. W., and Hynek, R. J., " Treatment of Cheese Processing
    Wastes- by the Bio-disc Process", in Proceedings of 26th Purdue
    Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University, pp. 89, 1971.

2.  MaAliley, J. E., "A Pilot Plant Study of a Rotating Biological
    Contactor for Secondary Treatment of Unbleached Kraft Mill
    Waste", Tappi, vol. 57, No. 9, 1974.

3.  Labella, S. A., Thaker, I. H., and Tahan, J. H.."Treatment of
    of Winey Wastes by Aerated Lagoon, Activated Sludge, and Rotating
    Biological Contactors", In Proceedings of 27th Purdue Industrial
    Waste Conference, Purdue University, pp. 803, 1972.

4.  Watt, J. C., and Cahill, C. J., "Wasteater Treatability Studies
    for a Grassroots Chemical Complex Using Bench Scale Rotating
    Biological Contactors", In Proceedings of the First National
    Symposium/Workshop on Rotating Biological Contactor Technology,
    Vol. 1, pp. 661, 1980.

5.  Chesler, 6. P., and Eskeland, G. R., "RBC for Munitions Waste-
    water Treatment", in  Proceedings of the First National Symposium/
    Workshop on Rotating  Biological Contactor Technology, Vol. 1,
    pp. 711, 1980.
                         988

-------
 6.  Tanacredt, J.  T,,  "Removal  of  Waste  Petroleujn Derived
     Polynuclear Arjnattc  Hydrocarbons  by  Rotating  Biological
     Contactors11,  In  Proceedings  of the first  National  Sympo-
     sium/Workshop  on Rotating Biological  Contactor Technology,
     Vol. 1, pp.725,  1980.                              .    ™*

 7.  Bracewell, L.  W.,  and Jenkins,  D., "Treatment of Phenol
     -Formaldehyde  Resin  Wastewater Using  Rotating Biological
     Contactors1',  in  Proceedings  of the First  National  Symposium/
     Workshop on Rotating Biological Contactor Technology, Vol.
     1, PP. 733, 1980.

 8.  Bintaja, H. H., et a!., "The Use  of Oxygen  In  A Rotating
     Disc Process", Water Research,  Vol. 10, pp. 561, 1976.

 9.  Huang, J. C.,  "Operational Experience of  Oxygen-Enriched
     Rotating Biological  Contactors",  in Proceedings of the
     First National Symposium/Workshop on  Rotating  Biological
     Contactors, Vol. 1,  pp. 637, 1980.

10.  Monod, J., "Recherches sur la croissance  des cutlures
     bacterbacteriennes", Hermann &  Cie. Paris, pp.211, 1942.

11.  Clark, J.  H., et a!., "Performance of a Rotating Biological
     Contactor Under Varying Wastewater Flow", Jour. Water Poll.
     Control Federation,  Vol. 50, pp.891,   1978.

12.  Standard Methods for the; Examination  of Water and Waste-
     water, 14th Edition, APHA-AWWA-WPCF,  1975.
                          989

-------
            INHIBITION OF NITRIFICATION BY CHROMIUM
                      IN A BIODISC SYSTM
     Shin Joh Rang, McNamee, Porter and Seeley
     Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104

     Jack A. BQjjehardt, Department of Civil Engineering
     The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
INTRODUCTION
     A series of investigations was undertaken to determine
the acceptability of certain .industrial wastes containing
hexavalent chromium by a biodisc system providing both secon-
dary treatment and biological nitrification.
     The initial objectives of the study were: to determine
the extent to which a biodisc system can tolerate chromium
(VI) without losing efficiency in either BOD removal or in
nitrification; to establish mechanisms of chromium removal
and the benefits of staging, and to understand differences
in short and long-term effects and steady state or shock load
conditions.
     These objectives were established to serve a/number of
purposes.  The data gathered will assist municipalities in
determining the quantity and characteristics of chromium
containing waste that may be accepted without causing inter-
ference in operation.  The data gathered will also assist
design engineers in understanding and better defining the
process reliability between an activated sludge and a bio-
disc system and finally the benefits of staging in an RBC-
                          990

-------
     Numerous  studies on the effect of metals on biological
nitrification have been reported in the literature in recent
years, all of which have been confined to activated sludge(l)
(2)(3).  For this reason, this study on the effects of hexa-
valent chromium on the biodisc system was undertaken.  In
order to minimize differences due to other effects, a pilot
plant was used.
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS AND APPARATUS
     The shape and dimensions of the pilot system used are
shown in Figure 1.  Each biodisc tank was equipped with two
sets (4 each) 2 ft. dia. disc media, a partition   that
separated the two adjoining stages, a drive with chain and
speed controller.  Two parallel systems were built for this
experiment, each containing three, two stage units.  Light
weight concrete fillets, 3" x 3", coated with paraffin were
placed at the bottom corners to prevent sludge accumulation
and to improve the mixing pattern in the tank.
     The standard substrate or feed solution was prepared
such that the characteristics would closely simulate those
of a typical municipal wastewater; 6005 at 200 mg/1, COD at
300 mg/1, total nitrogen at 20 mg/1.  Dextrine was selected
to be the major carbon source due: to its slow biodegradation
rate.
     A stock solution of hexavalent chromium was prepared
from K/jiC^Oy and fed at a predetermined concentration either
at the first stage or the fifth stage depending upon the
purpose of the particular experiment.  Typically, the slug
loads of chromium were fed at the fifth stage to test short-
term effect on nitrifying cultures.  Long-term effects on
the other hand, were studied by introducing chromium at the
first stage.
     A stock solution containing glucose was prepared and
fed to test the effect of high organic loads on nitrifiers.

            Table 1. Standard Feed Solution
Dextrin
Urea
Na2HP04
CaCl2
KC1
NaCl
MgS04
150 mg/1
42 mg/1
15.9 mg/1
5.6 mg/1
5.6 mg/1
12.1 mg/1
4.0 mg/1
Ivory Soap 6.3 mg/1
Consume Soup 2.1 ml/1
Ann Arbor tap water




                           991

-------
        LU
        CO
        o
        CO
        Q_
        LU
        CC
        Z)
        o
992

-------
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
A.  Long Term Effect of Chromium
     Three basis problems were present in this investigation:
(1) the concentration at which the effects of a given metal
ion are felt when fed continuously; (.2) the concentration
necessary to have a definite effect on a plant and the time
required; (3) the fate of chromium in the system.
     In all cases the two parallel biodisc systems were oper-
ating satisfactorily in both COD removal and nitrification
before chromium was introduced.  From earlier experiments
it had been determined that the hydraulic loading rate of
0.65 gpd/S.F. was appropriate for full nitrification(4).
     The effects of 3 concentrations (1, 3, and 10 mg/1) of
chromium fed at the first stage were studied in a preliminary
manner at a hydraulic loading rate of 0.65 gpd/S.F.  The
chromium was fed at 1.0 mg/1 approximately for two weeks,
while at other concentrations less than a week.
     The efficiency of nitrification was represented by its
end product, nitrate, N03, since the intermediate product
nitrite, NO-, was negligible throughout the experiment.  The
nitrification at 1 mg/1 of chromium in Run 2 was slightly
hampered at the second, third and fourth stages.and yet
nearly completed at the fifth stage.  The sixth 'stage picked
up the difference and completed nitrification, see Figure 2.
     Effects of chromium at 3 and 10 mg/1 on nitrification
were immediate and definitely inhibitory.  The nitrate con-
centrations were reduced by 65 and 75 percent at each dosage
in Runs  3 and 4, respectively.
     On  the basis of these preliminary findings, a long-
term investigation of the chromium effect on nitrification
began.   The chromium concentrations chosen were 1 mg/1 in
Run 5 and 2 mg/1 in Run 6.  In addition, the hydraulic
loading  rate was doubled to 1.3 gpd/S.F. to expand the
breadth  of the investigation.
     As  shown in Figure 3, for a system receiving 1 mg/1
of chromium, the concentration of ammonia N continued to
change for approximately a month before a relatively stable
performance level was reached for  the  system.
     Concentrations of other parameters such as COD, N02-N,
and N03-N at this steady state are shown in Figure 4.  The
following observations were made:
                           993

-------
z
<
u
g
   14 -t
   12 -
   10 -
c   8 -
111
   6 -
   4 -
   2 -
LOADING RATE = 0.65 GPD/S.F.
DETENTION TIME = 70 MIN./STAGE
DISC DIAMETER = 2 FT.
ROTATING SPEED' - 10 RPM
    'FEED1
             1
        FIGURE 2.  EFFECT OF CONTINUOUS CHROMIUM
                   FEED ON NITRIFICATION
                            994

-------
 16
 14
  12
<
_!
(3
S
<
ir
z
o
o
            RUN 5
Chromium = 1 mg/l     .
Load Rate = 1.3 gpd/ft2  »
Dia.of Disc =2-ft.
                                         N03-N
                                         at 34 Day
                                    NO2-N  .	
                                  — "at 34 Qay
     34 DAY
                                                               19 DAY
                                                            \ 10 DAY
      5 DAY
S-sa NOCr
  FEED        1         2         34         5
                              STAGES

              FIGURE 3.  LONG TERM EFFECT OF CHROMIUM
                         ON NITRIFICATION AT 1  MG/L
                                 995

-------
18
         CHROMIUM = 2mg/l
         LOAD RATE = 1.3gpd/ft2
         DIA. OF DISC = 2-ft.
 01—
FEED
           12345
                              STAGES

      FIGURE 4.  LONG TERM EFFECT OF CHROMIUM ON
                NITRIFICATION AT 2 MG/L
                                                          3 DAY
                                                         NOCr
                            996

-------
     - Most of the COD was removed in the first two stages.
     - Ammonification of organic nitrogen became complete
       at the third stage, compared to the first stage in
       Run 1.
     - Nitrification of ammonia began at the third stage and
       continued in the subsequent stages
     - Ho accumulation of nitrite was observed, indicating
       that the Nitrobacter group of organisms were not
       inhibited.  Only Nitrosomonas was inhibited by
       chromium.
     - Chromium concentrations in the liquid decreased
       rapidly in the first two stages (1.1 to 0.6 mg/1)
       and slowly in the subsequent stages (to 0.4 mg/1).
     - The major mechanism of chromium removal from the
       liquid appeared to be adsorption to the biomass.  The
       chromium content in the biomass layer closely approxi-
       mated the COD profile throughout the treatment system.
       In the first stage for example, the chromium consti-
       tuted approximately 2 per cent of biomass on a dry
       weight basis.  In the following stages, the chromium
       content ranged between 0.6 and 1.0 percent.
     - Staging definitely worked in favor of organisms in
       the later stages.  While organisms initial stages were
       exposed to chromium, those in the later stages were
       not.
     For the parallel system receiving 2 mg/1 of chromium,
Run 6, similar observations were made, see Figures 4 and 5.
The time required to reach a steady state operating condition
however, appeared shortened; 21 days.  The following observa-
tions were made:          "
     - COD was being removed substantially in the initial
       two stages but slowly,in the middle two stages.Overall
       removal was satisfactory.
     - Ammonification of organic nitrogen also took three
       stages to complete.
     - Nitrification began at the third stage and continued
       in the subsequent stages.            .  •  •• :
     - Chromium concentration in the liquid decreased rapidly
      , from 1.9 to 1.2 mg/1 in the first stage and remained
       between 1.2 and 1.1 mg/1 in the subsequent stages.
                          997

-------
1"
                                                          o
                           998

-------
             10   12   14  16  18
              NUMBER OF DAYS ELAPSED
                                   20   22
                                            24
                                                26  28
FIGURES. SHOCK RESPONSES ON NITRIFYING CULTURES
                   999

-------
     - The major mechanism of chromium removal is by
       adsorption to the biomass.   The chromium content in
       the biomass was approximately 2 per cent in the first
       stage and 0.8 per cent on a dry weight basis .in the
       last stage.
       Since the organic strength of the feed solution was
       the same between these two systems, the resultant
       biomass characteristics and quantity should be similar.
       It was then not surprising to observe that the
       adsorption of chromium by the biomass at steady state
       exhibited a similar mass relationship.  Due to a higher
       concentration gradient in the more highly loaded system
       however, steady state appeared to have been reached
       sooner in the latter system (Run 6) than in the former
       where 1 mg/1 of chromium (Run 5) was used.
     - Among the organisms involved, it may be concluded
       again that the more sensitive of the two groups of
       nitrifiers is Nitrosomonas.  Nitrobacter appeared to
       be less sensitive to chromium and thus to oxidize
       nitrite without much accumulation of nitrite.
     - Benefits of staging were again observed in that inhi-
       bition took effect by stage.  When a load came, the
       late stages would not be affected, even if the initial
       stages were adversely affected.
     From the data presented in the section, one could
summarize that:
     Hexavalent chromium could be adsorbed to the biomass
upon contact up to its adsorptive capacity (2 per cent for
heterotrophic organisms and less for a mixture of heterotro-
phic and autotrophic organisms)..  This is a higher level than
0.8 percent as reported on activated sludge(3).  Since the
biomass density of biofilm is higher than activated sludge
floe, it appears that the adsorptive capacity improves in a
biodisc system.
     Inhibition was controlled more by what was in the bio-
mass layer than in the bulk liquid.  Even though the bulk
liquid carried chromium at or above 0.6 mg/1, the effect was
not immediate.
     Staging helped the process as a. whole. Benefits could
be achieved in two ways:  While an upstream stage received
and removed chromium, the downstream stages were spared from
the inhibitory impact or received a minimal quantity, all
of which increased the overall process reliability.
                          1000

-------
     Since the chromium  concentration in  the initial  stages
would be higher than the  case where staging was not practiced,
the rate of adsorption to the biofilm would be faster.  Under
a slug load, the chromium would concentrate in one stage
and upon sloughing, could be removed from the system  in an
efficient manner.
     Nitrosomonas showed  a  greater degree of inhibition by
chromium than Nitrobacter,  which was consistent with  observa-
tions elsewhere(2).
B.  Short Term Effect of  Chromium         .         ,   •
     The problems generated in this phase of the  study were
to investigate: (1) that  concentration which would produce
definite inhibition -and  the resulting reaction time.
(2) the rate  of recovery,  if' any, once the slug  is passed.
(3) acclimation  effect  under repeated slug doses.
•(4) the impacts of heterotrophic organisms on nitrifiers.
     In this study concerned with the effect of slug  doses
of hexavalent chromium on the nitrification process,  concen-
trations of chromium at  5 mg/1 for 2 days (Run 7), 10 mg/1
for: 2 hours (Run 8) and  50  mg/1 for 2 hours  (Run  9) were
used in succession.  Approximately a week of recovery was
allowed between runs.  These concentrations were  fed .at the
fifth stage since at this point the system was supporting
full nitrification.  The  efficiency as measured by the reac-
tion product, or nitrate, NOo, dropped immediately as shown
in Figure 6.  As soon as  the chromium feed was removed from
the system however, the  nitrification was shown to resume
.and within approximately a  week had returned to its original
level.  The degree of inhibition appeared to be inversely
proportional to the mass  loading.  It was postulated  that
this rapid resumption of nitrification was made possible by
three contributing factors:  (1) the adsorption of chromium
to  the biomass layer which  appeared to have caused an
immediate inhibition of  the existing culture and  yet  remained
within the biomass layer, where its presence caused no fur-
ther inhibition of new growth.  The de.sorption of chromium
did not appear to be significant;  (2) continuous  seeding
from the  fourth stage which contained nitrifying  cultures;
 (3) acclimation  of cultures to chromium  was a definite con-
dition which minimized the  degree of inhibition in Run.8
 (with 50 mg/1  chromium).  In this case inhibition was not
as  severe as in Run 7 where 10 mg/1 chromium was  fed.
                          1001

-------
C.  Impact of Presence of Heterotrophs on Nitrification
     In an effort to investigate nitrifying organisms compe-
tetiveness in the presence of heterotrophic organisms,
50 rag/1 of glucose was fed to the fifth stage for three days
in a similar manner as chromium had been previously intro-
duced .
     Results are shown in Figure 7 that indicate with the
growth of heterotrophs on the surface, nitrification
efficiency starts to decline.  Once the glucose feed was
removed, there is no immediate increase in nitrification
activity.
     It appears that nitrifying cultures are outgrown by
heterotrophs on the same surface, thereby they become buried
among the heterotrophs.  With the increased oxygen demand
exerted by heterotrophs, the dissolved oxygen concentration
in the bulk liquid decreased to 1.0 mg/1 and as a result
was limited for nitrifiers.  This data confirms a theory that
under a d.o. suppressed environment, nitrifiers cannot func-
tion properly and therefore a nitrogenous oxygen demand can-
not exist.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS


     Chromium may enter municipal waste  treatment plants
in many different ways.  Perhaps most frequently it  occurs
in plating waste, although it may have its  source in tanning
operations,  in waters  given corrosion inhibition treatment
with  chromate, or in  aluminum-anodizing  wastes.
     Concentrations of hexavalent chromium  up  to 10  mg/1
were  fed  up  to four months on a  continuous  basis to  two six-
stage biodisc systems  treating  synthetic sewage, with con-
centrations  of 300 mg/1  of COD  and  20 mg/1  of  nitrogen.
Initial  stages of the discs were supporting heterotrophic
organisms, while the  biological  nitrification  was achieved
by  autotrophs in the  later stages.
      Concentrations of hexavalent chromium  up  to 50  mg/1
were  also fed as slugs to  the biodisc  system to  test the
 effects  of such  doses.
      In  addition,  the effects  of the  presence  of heterotro-
 phic organisms  on nitrifiers was examined by feeding glucose
 directly into  a nitrifying stage.
                         1002

-------
36 _
          01     2     3     4     5     6
            NO. OF DAYS AFTER GLUCOSE ADDITION
              I

 FIGURE?.  EFFECT OF GLUCOSE ADDITION ON NITRIFICATION
                          1003

-------
     From the observations made in this investigation, the
following conclusions may be drawn.
     On a continuous basis, 1 mg/1 of hexavalent chromium
     exhibited a consistently inhibitory effect on
     nitrifying cultures.
     The major mechanism of hexavalent chromium inhi-
     bition to microorganisms appeared to be by adsorp-
     tion.  When chromium is adsorbed to a discrete
     active microorganism, the inhibitory effect sets
     in quickly.  Chromium also may be adsorbed to non-
     active biological film or floes, thereby becoming
     immobilized.  The degree of adsorption or affinity
     however, depends on the characteristics of the film
     or floes in the system.  For example, heterotrophic
     cultures established in the initial stages, oxidizing
     primarily carbonaceous materials exhibited chromium
     retention of approximately 2 per cent, while the
     mixture of nitrifying cultures containing a limited
     quantity of heterotrophic organisms established in
     the later stages, exhibited a concentration of approxi-
     mately 0.8 per cent on a dry weight basis.
     As previously indicated data gathered in this inves-
     tigation   showed  that the rates of adsorption and
     the resulting inhibition to microorganism  were
     fast.
     In a matter of hours the inhibition at a stage was
     well defined.   When the adsorptive capacity of the
     entire biomass film in a stage was reached, the
     impact was shown by reduced COD removal for heterotrophs
     and reduced nitrate generation by nitrifiers.
     Data also indicated that between two major groups
     of nitrifiers, Nitrosomonas was more sensitive to
     chromium and thus ammonia oxidation was decreased,
     while the nitrite oxidation to nitrate remained
     unchanged.
     Data further indicated that staging offered advan-
     tages in process reliability and also in isolation
     and efficient removal of affected sludge from the
     system.
                         1004

-------
The impact of slug loads of chromium on nitrifica-
tion was tested at concentrations up to 50 mg/1. *
Since the biofilm at the fifth stage composed
mostly of nitrifying cultures, the chromium addi-
tion at that stage resulted in immediate reduction
in nitrification, even at 5 mg/1.  The complete
recovery of the system however was rapid, taking place
within approximately a week, indicating that the
chromium retained in the film and floes did not
adversely affect the newly developing cells being
established.  Desorption of these chromium compounds
appeared not to have generated a problem.  The
RBC system also showed a benefit due to continuous
seeding from the upstream stage.        '
An advantage due to previous exposure to chromium
was also shown.  Acclimation was evidenced from the
studies of slug doses.
The fact was likewise confirmed that when hetero-
trophs start to grow on the same support surface,
nitrifiers cannot compete for either surface or
oxygen and thus become overgrown.
                    1005

-------
REFERENCES
   Tornlinson, T., Boon, A., and Trotman, C. , "Inhibition
   of Nitrification in the Activated Sludge Process of
   Sewage Disposal," J. Applied Bacteriology, 29, (2),
   1966, pp. 266-291.
   Painter, H., "Review of Literature on Inorganic Nitrogen
   Metabolism in Microorganisms," Water Research, Vol. 4,
   1970, PP. 393-450.
   Anon, Interaction of Heavy Metals and Biological Sewage
   Treatment Processes, U.S. Public Health Service Publi-
   cation No. 999-wp-22, Environmental Health series,
   May, 1965.
   Borchardt, J. , Kang, S., and Chung T., Nitrification
   of Secondary Municipal Waste Effluents by Rotating
   Bio-discs, U.S. EPA 600/2-78-061, June, 1978.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
     The support of Capital Consultants of Lansing, Michigan
in this research is acknowledged.
     This research was  conducted at  the Sanitary Engineering
Laboratory,  the University of Michigan.  At the time,
S. J. Kang was a graduate student in the Department of Civil
Engineering.
                         100F

-------
         PART IX:  INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
        SCALE-UP AND PROCESS ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR
            PLASTIC MEDIA TRICKLING FILTRATION
        Thomas P. Quirk, P.E.  Department of Civil and
        Environmental Engineering, Vanderbilt University,
        Nashville, Tennessee.

        W. Wesley Eckenfelder, Jr.  Department of Civil
        and Environmental Engineering, Vanderbilt Univer-
        sity, Nashville, Tennessee.
ABSTRACT

     Reaction models for bio-oxidation using a sheet flow re-
actor with a fixed biological film similar to that used in
plastic media trickling filtration are developed.  The models
utilize plug flow hydraulics and accept various descriptions
of BOD removal kinetics including:  zero order, first order,
retardant and concentration dependent mechanisms.  Hydraulics,
kinetics and film geometry are individually incorporated.
      System model equations are arranged into linear expres-
sions which allow graphical determination of model applicabil-
ity and rate constants from plots of experimental data.
     The design and operating characteristics of laboratory
simulation equipment are presented.  Simulation equipment con-
sists of continuously fed inclined planes with effluent sedi-
mentation and recirculation.   Effluents can be fed from and
returned to cold room storage.  Heating tapes control tempera-
ture above ambient levels.  System location in a cold-room
provides temperature control at below ambient levels.
     Applicability of the models is verified using operating
data from laboratory and full scale studies of a number of
effluents including:  municipal sewage, whey wastewater, kraft
                              1007

-------
mill effluent, sulfite mill discharges, hard-board mill_ef-
fluent, yeast fermentation effluents, pharmaceutical dischar-
ges and meat processing wastes.  Additional verification is
presented from literature data utilizing a glucose substrate.
Scale-up calculations are developed to utilize laboratory
data to determine full scale performance for various packing
geometries.  Design calculations are also presented including
determination of the influence of recirculation.

INTRODUCTION

     The trickling filter is comprised of a bed of media on
which biological film growths develop.  Removal of BOD is ob-
tained by aerobic processes at the film surface and by anaer-
obic processes within the film interior.  Modifications to
the classic rock trickling filter introduced plastic geometric
media to obtain increased surface area and porosity.  Current
practice generally employs a lattice type structure of verti-
cally oriented media which induces a sheet flow regimen.
     Reactor operation is such that laboratory scale simula-
tion can be used for rate .constant determination and in para-
llel operation with pilot plant equipment to reduce data
collection requirements and extend interpretation of pilot
scale results.  Simulation equipment utilizes an inclined
plane of up to 18' in length operating with thermal regulators
and evaporator control systems.
     The theory of BOD removal by trickling filter  slime over
a  reaction surface similar to  that of  an inclined plane has
not been formulated in the existing engineering literature.
Full scale design  equations   in current use have  been fre-
quently developed by emperical methods or by analogy  to for-
mulations used to describe BOD exertion in general.   The work
presented herein describes development and verification of
reaction models suitable both  for laboratory studies  and for
scale-up to prototype conditions.
     Consideration is given  to the analysis of  laboratory
scale  data, the interpretation of pilot and full  scale  results
and  the design of prototype  systems  for each reaction model.
The  theoretical development  is presented in the following  se-
quence:
              °  General  reaction model for inclined planes

              o' Specific models  for  alternative bio-kinetic
                rate processes
              o  Influence  of recirculation and  temperature
                          1008

-------
              0   Scale-up techniques for full scale
                  conditions

              o   Design Procedures

General Reaction  Model

     A general model  for BOD removal on an inclined plane
surface is obtained by  the solution of a material balance
statement in which the  hydraulics of liquid flow and the kin-
etics of biological reaction have been separately included.
A schematic of an inclined plane system is shown in Figure  1.
              Figure 1  Schemotlc Representation, BOD Removal
                     Over Slimed Surface
          The material  balance statement is written thus:

                 INPUT - OUPUT - REMOVAL = ACCUMULATION

INPUT and OUTPUT terms  are self explanatory.  The REMOVAL term
is defined by the geometry of the reactor and the kinetics of
the biological reaction.   The ACCUMULATION terms accounts for
                            mop

-------
the change in the quantity of BOD stored in the reactor vol-
ume.  For both inclined plane surfaces and trickling filters
this storage is negligible.  The terms of the material balance
statement are mathematically defined as follows:
                              =  (Q+R)Sa

                              =  (Q+R)Se
                                KrVr
where:
                 INPUT

                 OUTPUT

                 REMOVAL

                 ACCUMULATION = 0

                 Q = Untreated flow (gal min"1)

                 R = Recirculation flow (gal min~ )

                 Sa= BOD concentration as applied to
                     reactor (mg/1)

                 Se= BOD effluent concentration-mg/1

                 Vr=Volume of reactor (gal)

                 Kr= A generalized BOD removal rate constant
                     for the reactor volume  (mg/1 min~l)

     The reactor is examined over a differential element of
plane height (dH) to define reactor volume:
                  dVr = (d)  (W)  (dH)
                                            (1)
      The material balance for BOD input and removal is then
 stated  as follows:
                  (dS)  (Q+R)  = (Kr) (d)  (W)  (dH)

 which when rearranged  into a differential statement becomes:

                  d§. _  Kr(d)  (W)
                  dH
                        (Q +
                                            (2)
 The term,  (Q + R)/W is conveniently grouped as a hydraulic
 loading per unit of plane width (U) as follows:
                _dS = (Kr) (d)
                  dH     (TT)
                                            (3)
                           1010

-------
 Equation (3)  then is the general statement for BOD removal
 over a slimed surface.

 First Order  React_imi_JCine_ti_cs

      At this  juncture biological reaction kinetics may be in-
 troduced to  develop  a specific reaction model, e.g.,  first
 order,  retardant  etc.   A first order reaction model has been
 found in practice to apply  most frequently to trickling fil-
 ter  performance.
      The generalized rate constant  (Kr)  for a first order re-
 action is expressed  as  the  product  of a specific  velocity
 constant and  the  amount of  substrate present.   The relation-
 ship  in generalized  terms is:.
              Kr =  (k)  (S)
                           (4)
The units used  for k  and  S  are  dependent  on  the way  in which
the reaction is described e.g.  in  activated  sludge work  S  has
the units of concentration  and  k is  expressed  as  a substrate
concentration change, per  unit of substrate and organisms pre-
sent, per unit  of time.   Kr then has  the  net units of time"1.
     In fixed film reactors the specific  velocity constant is
expressed in terms of the unit  weight of  substrate removed per
unit weight of  film present, per unit of  time.
              k =
where:
                  dt Mf
              dMs = substrate weight change
              dt  = time change
              Mf  = film weight present

By expressing substrate weight in terms of concentration, i.e. dM =V dS, k
then becomes:                                      -     •         s
                  VrdS  =  /dS\  1
                  dtMf     (dt) /fj
                          (5)
Mf/Vr can then be termed the equivalent concentration of or-
ganisms in the elemental reactor volume being analyzed.  For
the inclined plane:
v
                          /gf\
                          \ V
                           ion

-------
where:
  df = depth of fixed film
  d  = depth of flow q
  g  = specific gravity of film
     These definitions  then provide the expression for
the generalized  reaction rate as follows:
wherein
  Kr = (k') fS)


  k'  = (k) (df) (gf)
                                           (6)
     The effective  slime  concentration provides for an active
weight of organisms per unit of area and thereby implies that
a thickness of  film is  operating to effect BOD metabolism.
This is indeed  the  case and has been experimentally verified
by Hoehn and Roy  (1).   Figure 2 presents their data for COD
removal vs. film  thickness.
            o
            E C
            ££

            §§
            o o
            «- en
            o E
            o
            cc
                 450
300
150
           200      400

        Mean film thickness (urn)
                                              6OO
            Figure 2
      Rate of COD Removal as a Function
      or  Film Thickness (I)
                           1012

-------
     The description of a first order reaction may then be
completed as follows:
                     dS
                     dH
k'S
 U
(7)
     It is worthwhile to note that the derivation of Kr pro-
ceded  in such a way as to eliminate flow depth (d) from the
final expression.  This in turn results in an exponent of 1.0
for the flow term (U).   If depth remained in the final equa-
tion then the fact that depth over an unslimed plane varies
with (U)~l/3 would result in an exponent of 2/3 for the flow
term U.  The elimination of depth also tacity implies that
the reaction at the slime/water interface controls rather
than the transport of substrate through the liquid depth to
reach the interface.  Equation (7) thus describes a reaction
controlled model.  The description of the active organism con-
centration(Mf/Vr)interms of a ratio of slime specific weight
divided by liquid depth also results in an averaging process
for the amount of biomass effectively operating to remove and
metabolize BOD.  The definition of the amount of biomass rep-
resente.dthe first half of'the analysis. The balance of the
(Kr) breakdown used kinetic expressions which are independent
of organism concentration i.e. Kr~ k'S.  The effect of this
two part definition is to effectively insert a linear aver-
aging technique into the overall rate constant Kr.
Thus, any other BOD removal and metabolism mechanism which
can be reasonably described by a linear average of a combina-
tion of liquid depth and bio-mass amount will be approximated
by equation  (7).  This may help to explain why the first or-
der formulation has been found to apply to performance data
over a wide range of process conditions.  Integration of ex-
pression  (7) provides the basic analytical relationship for
BOD removal over an inclined surface:
                         =  e-k'H/U
                    (8)
      In  the application  of  equation  (8)  to  laboratory  analysis
an  incline of up  to  45°  from  the  horizontal may be  used with-
out concern for the  non-formulated depth effects  caused by
angle of inclination.

Incorporation of  Recirculation  and Temperature
               g                      ,
      The ratio -5^ describes the change  in BOD as  applied  to
                           1013

-------
the film and, therefore, implicitly includes the effects of
recirculation.  For design purposes BOD changes relative to
the undiluted wastewater are required.  The change in reactor
BOD's is related to the undiluted wastewater by a material
balance around the plane as follows:
                   *a _
                           r  1-
                                   = f
where:
     (1+r) (1-E)

r = recirculation ratio R/Q
                           (9)
                  E = BOD removal,efficiency based on
                      raw wastewater

The factor (f) is introduced for  topographical simplicity.
     The effect of temperature on reaction rate is introduced
using the Arrhenius relationship.
where:
      k'   AT
        200
                                              (10)
                  k' = reaction constant at temperature t

                  k*2Q = reaction constant at standard  .
                         temperature, 20°C

                  At = reaction temperature differential
                       °C-20

                  6 = constant, usually taken as 1.035

ANALYSIS OF LABORATORY PLANE PERFORMANCE

     The analysis equation  for first order performance is
completed as follows:
                              it H/U
                   f = e
      . ,
      k
                                              (11)
A graphical solution  to equation  (11)  is obtained by  taking
double logarithms as  follows:
              log
                   H
                    2.Slog  (f)
                log U + log(l/k'7n)   (12)
A plot  of  data  on  log  paper will  provide  a  linear  correlation
with  slope equal to  1.0  and an  intercept  of log  (l/k^o0)  at
                             1014

-------
U = 1.0.
     It is important to note that the variable H, height of
plane, is portrayed as having a linear effect on plane per-
formance.  This is so in that laboratory planes are short and
receive a controlled, uniform discharge.  Both of these char-
acteristics support a linear relationship between height,
flow pathway, film presence and thickness etc.  This condition
does not necessarily apply to full scale towers.
     An application of first order kinetics to inclined plane
treatment of whey plus sewage, Quirk  (2), is shown on Figure 3.
Test results were obtained using plane lengths of 9 and 18 ft.
operated at hydraulic loadings from 0.02 to 0.15 gpm/f t.  Re-
cycle ratios ranged from 0. to 6.0.  Film areas of 0.375 and
0.750 SF provided the data shown   operating  -over a range of
organic loadings of 0.08 to 0.95 Ibs BOD/day/SF Slime. An hy-
draulic coefficient of n =: 1.0 and k2Qo = 1-8 x 10~3 gpm/SF
were determined.  Shultze (3) also experimented with a mixture
of whey plus sewage using vertical meshed screens 3' x 6' in
dimension as a fixed film reactor.  His data correlated using
a first order reaction as shown in Figure 4.  Hydraulic ef-
fects produced an n =: 1.0-with a reaction rate constant of
k
   ° = 2.5 x 10~3 gpm/SF.  Hydraulic loadings ranged from
   8  to 0.45  gpm/SF and were about three times the hydraulic
loadings used by Quirk (2) .
 "2
0.
Additional Kinetic Models

     Kinetic models  other  than  a  first  order  reaction have
been employed  to  describe  biological  oxidation.  While  less
popular  than the  first  order  assumption,  these  additional mo-
dels have been found to correlate bio-oxidation data in a
successful manner.   Because of  a  cumbersome mathematical
structure when used  for fixed film reactors,these  models have
been applied primarily  to  fluid bed reactors  such  as activated
sludge,  aerated stabilization basins, etc.
     The relationships  for laboratory planes  have  been  extend-
ed  to  include:

                  1.  Linear and exponentially retardant  reactions

                  2.   Concentration dependent  reaction

                  3.   Zero  order or constant rate reaction
                          1015

-------
"   '00
           I 20-3I°C
           BOD 270-b'O mg/1
               = l.S x 10-3 gpm/SF
           n * 1.0
       Figure  3   wney ond Sewage Performonce on Inclined  Plane  (2)
S
",
Z  ,00
           Schultze i3)

           Sewage Plus wney
           vertical Screen Filter
           T - 11 to 220C
           n » 1.0       ,
           k20 - 2.5 x IO-3gpm/SF
       Figure
                  wney and Sewage Performance on Vertical  Screen
                              1016

-------
Retardant Reaction Models

     In a simple retardant reaction the rate of BOD removal
per unit weight of organism  is proportional not only to the
BOD concentration remaining but also to the fraction of BOD
remaining.  Rates of removal decrease, or retard,rapidly as
high efficiencies of removal are approached and the relatively
assimilable organics havebeen metabolized. The kinetic state-
ment is written as :

                   Kr =  (k)(Mf/Vr)(S)  (S/Sa)     (13)

After integration  the completed equation for slimed plane
analysis  is written as:
                            (k)'   •  (H)
                   f = 1 +
                               U
(14)
An exponantially retardant reaction can be described by  the
relationship:            r      i -il/N
                    (f) =  1 + ~it                 (15)

Concentration Dependent Model

     A  concentration  dependent  reaction assumes  a linear reac-
tion of  all  substrate elements  with the percent  remaining as
the expression  of  retardancy.   Unlike  the retardant reaction,
the concentration  dependent  formulation does  not relate  remo-
val rate to  concentration remaining but rather to a maximum
rate which would occur at zero  removal.  The  equation  for a
slimed  plane operating with  concentration dependency becomes:

                        k'H/USa
                    f = e
(16)
      The combined parameters of H,  U,  and Sa represent the or-
 ganic loading or F/M ratio per unit area of film.   Thus:
                          YF/M
 (17)
 a linear plot is obtained by relating log(f) to k/(F/M).
     Inclined  plane studies using  glucose  were found to be
 correlated by a concentration dependent reaction.  The Maier(A)
 data is correlated by a concentration dependent model as shown
 on Figure (5).  The separation of the 37.3°C data is apparent
 while the balance of the results fit a single model.  The re-
 action rate for these glucose experiments was found from the
                          1017

-------
correlation slope at k*2Q = °-5'0 x 10~3 lbs/SF/Day.  The exis-
tence of a vertical intercept a 1/(F/M) = 0 is not predicted
by theory and appears to represent the effects of reduced hy-
draulic rates and increased glucose concentrations used to at-
tain high F/M values.
     A similar effect is evidenced by the data of Oleszkiewicz
and Eckenfelder (5).  This inclined plane data correlated us-
ing a concentration dependent reaction as shown in Figure (6).
The wide variation in feed BOD concentration and recycle ra-
tios used in these studies were all encompased by a single
model.  The phenomenon of a vertical intercept is again evi-
denced.

Zero Order Reaction

     In a zero order reaction the rate of BOD removal per unit
weight of orgamism is constant and is not effected by sub-
strate concentration, degree of removal etc.  The relationship
is:
                              (F/M)
                                             (18)
Figure (7) illustrates the zero order reaction obtained on ef-
fluents from an Insulation Board mill operating on a wood and
mineral raw material, Quirk  (6).  Inclined planes of 8 and 10
feet were used and operated  over a range of 23 to 30°C.  Raw
wastewater BOD ranged from 1000 to 6500mg/l.  Recycle ratios
of up to 20/1 were used.  A  ^Q value of 5 x 10~3 Ibs/SF/day
was obtained for the highly  spread data.  A second illustra-
tion of the zero order reaction was obtained in a study of
yeast fermentation effluents, Quirk (7),as shown in Figure 8.
A reaction rate coefficient  of 9.0 x 10~3 Ib/SF/day at 20°C
was obtained.  A comparison  between this data and subsequent
pilot plant operation will be presented below.

SCALE-UP RELATIONSHIPS

     Conversions to full scale tower conditions is made by ad-
justing plane performance for the following:

     1.  Hydraulic loading at full tower height.

     2.  Film thickness anticipated.
                          1018

-------
      Holer  (t) blucose

      26.7 mg/l a 2H.K°C
      «6.0 mg/
      50.0 UK)/
      300  mg/
      27.5 mg/
      65.5 mq/1
      127.0 mg/!
      _. . .• rag/I
      65.5 rag/1
      127.5 mo/1

      k20  -.5  x
   2H.i|°C
 a 24.n°c
 a 2n.i"c
 a lo.6°c
 a io,6°c
 a lo.6°c
 a 37.32C
 a 37.3°C
 a 37.3°C

10"5 Ibs/SF/Doy
                                              10.«°C 4 24.4 °C
     .1   .2   .3  .4   .6   .«   .7  .>  .8  1.0 1.1  1.2  1.3 1.4 1.6  1.« 1.7
           Figure  5
                         fl AT / (F/u) - 3F/om/D«V

                      Glucose Removal  on on Inclined Plane C4>
       Sq - 215 to 5018 mg/l
       e diluted feed
       • reclrculated feed
       • reclrculated feed
                   1000  to  5000  mg/l
                   1800  to  3<400  ma/1
                   0.2 to 2.0
                   250 to 700 mg/l
                              r - 2.75 to 8.50
       Concentration'Dependant Kinetics
                 10-3
       kt - 2.05 Ibs/day/SF
        SO        1OO        18O        ZOO        28O        MO


                      1OS /(F/U) - SF/ Day /«>.

Figure 6   Pharmaceutical Waste Removal on an  Inclined Plane (5)
                               imp

-------
     e

     §.
                    -i	1	1	r


                     HordBoorg Hostexoters (6)

                     Ternc 23.7° to 30°C
                     BOD  1000 to 6500 mg/I
                     Zero Order Reaction
                     k20 - 5 x 10-" IDS/SF/Doy
                     n - 1.0
                     • Mineral Board Hastewater
                     • wpoa Bogrd wgstewqter
                             minprnl/wnnn
4.0



3.1



J.O
              Figure 7   Hordboard Wastewaters  Treated on an
                         Inclined Plane (6)
1.0
0.01	
  1.0
Yeast Fermentation Wostewoter (?)

BOO = 1500 to 8000 mg/1
Zero Order Kinetics
                                                   * 9 x  10'3  Ibs/SF/day
           Figure 8   Yeast Fermentation Wostewater Treated on  an
                      Incline Plane (7)
                                    1020

-------
     3.  Surface are? characteristics of packing media.

     4.  Hydraulic characteristics of packing media.

Hydraulic loading on a full scale tower is related to plane
hydraulics by geometry as follows:
where:
                  q  =  (U)   (A"v)

                  q  =  application rate to tower in gal min~l
                        ft ~2 of tower area

                  U  =  application rate to plane in gal min~l
                        ft    of film width

                  A"v=  slimed area of tower packing media
                        supporting a film growth - ft^ft^S

Slime thickness reduces exposed surface area below that avail-
able from bare media.  A knowledge of media configuration and
slime thickness can be employed to determine the correction
required as follows:
                  A"v = (A'v) (ft)
where:
                  A'v = wetted area of tower packing media
                        supporting a film growth - ft^ft~3

                  ffc  = a factor for the reduction of slime
                        area below that of bare media due to
                        thickness of slime growth

Laboratory observations of film thickness indicate an ft range
of 0.80 to 0.90.  Hydraulic  characteristics of packing media
are introduced by relating the wetted surface area A1  and
detention time to hydraulic  loading.  Adjustments of this type
are required primarily for media shape and an "aspacked" geo-
metry other than that obtained with a vertically oriented
media.  The adjustments account for the change in wetted area
which occurs as liquid impinges upon randomly packed media and
is splashed or otherwise diverted into contact with additional
media surface which would otherwise remain unslimed.  Adjust-
ment can also be made for the change in reaction rate as a
result of a change in the rate of transport of BOD from the
flowing liquid to the slime surface.  This can also include
the effects of removal of suspended BOD by agglomeration
                           1021

-------
processes.  These additions considerably complicate the math-
ematical descriptions of the process while many times failing
to increase the accuracy of design calculations.
     For randomly packed media,adjustments for hydraulic ef-
fects can be made using a mathematical form prevalent in chem-
ical engineering when packed towers are analyzed, i.e.
                           (q)'
and
                  ii)
                  (k)
         (q)
                              n
Substitution of the above scale-up relationships into the
equation for plane performance under first order kinetics
yields the equation for full scale performance as  follows
f =
where:
                                     t H/(q)n  (19)
                  C =  a  combined  constant  for  all
                       hydraulic effects .
The value of  the  exponent  (n) will vary  from an  expected min-
imum of 0.50  for  randomly  packed media to  1.0 for  packing  sim-
ilar to stacked vertical   sheets.  For vertical  media  a sheet
 flow regimen  dynamically similar to  that of  plane  hydraulics
tends  to be maintained.  However, an adjustment  is required
for use of less than total media area resulting  from distribu-
tion hydraulics through the tower.   A constant adjustment  of
90 percent media  utilization is employed as  follows:

                   A v - r  =  QO
                     _ __ ~~ «TJ    m J \J
                   AV
where:                                          2  _•}
                   A'  s wetted  surface  area  (ft  ft J)        ;

                   A   = manufacturer's  rating for dry
                    v   media (ft2ft-3)

                   C   =  a  coefficient for  wetting efficiency
                    w

 for vertically oriented  media the  value of the hydraulic co-
 efficient (C) in equation (19)  equals Cw and the design re-
 lationship is stated as  follows:
                            1022

-------
 where:
f =, e


k20 =
                                                 (20)
                                       ' ft ' Cw
 The above scale-up procedure assumes that the adjustment for
 non-uniform slime growth can be made by using a single linear
 correction factor (Cw).  This is equivalent to assuming that
 areas of non-slime growth occur with equal size and frequency
 throughout the tower depth.  This assumption may or may not
 apply to all tower designs.  The alternative approach is to
 assume that the uniformity of hydraulic distribution will vary
 in a non-linear fashion with tower height (H).  In this cir-
 cumstance the effective wetted surface area will be related to
 height as follows:
                        Av
                            =  C
                           (21)
 where:
                       C = a correlation constant
                       (1-m) = a measure of the non-linear
                               distribution of film area.

 As the value of m increases, the non-uniformity of film growth
 with height also increases.  At m = 0 slime growth is uniform
 throughout the tower at m = 1 there is no slime growth in the
 tower.  The full scale relationships when m > 0 is:
                       f =
 Full scale design equations for the balance of the kinetic
 models are summarized on Table 1.
 Scale-up Calculations
                                                 2^-3
"Whey and Sewage - using a packing with Av = 27 ft ft

                         o0c plane = 0.0018 gpm/ft2 = k'p

                          = Cw x f t x AV

                          = 0.9 x 0.9 x 27 = 22 ft2ft~3
    (TOWER)
                                        Av
                              1023

-------
Y«_-asc Wastewater -
               = 0.0018 gpm/f 2  • 22  ft2
                                      ft?
               = 0.04 gpm/f t3

  01. served k20o= °-03 gpm/ft3

using a packing with    = 27 ft2 ft~3
                        plane = 0.009 lbs/day/ft

                           \ = 27 ft2/ft3

                           A^ = 22 ft2/ft3
                   k20° TOWER = °-009 x 22 = 0.198 lbs/day/ft3

                   Observed kO = 0.180 lbs/day/ft3
                         1024

-------
                  CO

                  CM
                          CM
                                    m
                                    CM
                                             CN
                                      cr





cc
t-i
0)
4-1
i— 1
•iH
ft,

60
C



CX
•H
4=
CO
C
o
•H
4—1
CO
t-l
CU

C
f-l ^
I cr


R
e

<^>
V
c


CO
V-i '
•H
fn
.. ;




cu
tH
&

•H
CO


4-1
rj
«'.

J-(
CO
4J
a;

r-(
cd
•H

C
CU
C
O
ex
X
w


4-1
p*
CO
-a
}-i
cO
4-1
CU
Pi
;H
4-1
CO

4-1
C
cu
a
• pi
0



4-1

CU

C
cu,
ex

o
                             1025

-------
Full Scale Performance

     For a given type of packing,tower volume can vary with
the following design parameters:

               1.  Liquid application rate

               2.  Recycle ratio

               3.  Tower height

               4.  Efficiency of BOD removal

The effects of variations in the first three parameters are
dependent on (1) the necessity to maintain a minimum wetting
rate and (2) the numerical value of the exponent (n).  In all
cases, an increase in efficiency of removal requires an in-
crease in tower volume.  In general, the effects of design
parameters can be described as follows:
Design Variables
Change in Variable
Change in tower
        volume
H
r
q
E
Increase
Increase
Increase
Increase
Decrease or no ch
Increase or no ch
Increase or no ch
Increase
Structural requirements and hydraulic distribution problems
limit maximum tower heights.  Heights of 20 ft are common with
maximums to 45 ft.
     Commercial packing of the lattice structure type appears
to require minimum application velocities of + 0.5 min ft~2.
Operation below the minimum velocity can result in progress-
ively less utilization of tower packing.
     In order to maintain commonly used heights and provide a
minimum application velocity, effluent recycle is usually re-
quired.  The added tower volume required to accommodate  the
recycle varies with both the efficiency of removal sought and
the  recycle ratio finally  employed.   Because of the
                             1026

-------
non-uniform influence of process  variables,  design calcula-

tions  can involve  relatively  complex manipulations.

     Process design data from pilot plant  operation are  ob-

tained using relationships  (23)  to (27) together with  graph-

ical correlation techniques.   The type of  correlations used

while  mathematically identical can non-the-less effect the

value  of the process constants obtained and,  therefore,  the

design of the full scale unit.   Techniques which utilize, sep-

arate  rearrangements of Equations (23) to  (27) to calculate

m & n  independently can have  this tendency.   A single  correla-

tion equation can  be obtained by taking logarithum's twice

and rearranging the result  to provide a linear relationship.

When m = o the full scale first order equation is expressed
as:
             log
                    H6
                      AT
                   •2-3 log  (f)
= n log(q)  + log 1/k
                      20
(28)
The  slope of the  correlation  is (n) and  the intercept  at q =

1.0  is  log (l/k20).

      In order to  provide for  the possibility that m>0 a two

part technique is used and  is illustrated  Figure 9.
                                      1.  Let n - U-ro'.-C
                                      2.  Rearrange eajct;on UK)
                                      3.  Obtain .slope =• 1-m
                                      1.  Obtain intercept
                                         values at Q/H =1.0
                                      3.
                                         Plot Intercept values
                                         from Step 1 vs.
                                         hydraulic rote (Q)
                                         Obtain Slope •= C
                                         Intercept - logn/j...'
                                                  l/K20j
                                         Compute n value
                                      1.  Substitute IT. value
                                         from Step 1 into
                                         general eauotion
                                      2.  Rearrange eauailor. n»)
                                      3.  Obtain slope = n.
                                      4.  Obtain Intercept
                                         « log f '  "
               Figure 9
                           LOO (a)

                      Graotilcal Analysis for m greater than o
                              1027

-------
     A correlation is first obtained for variable tower height
at constant hydraulic rate (q).  Double logarithums of equa-
tion (24) are used together with a mathematical substitution
designed to eliminate the effects of the hydraulic coefficient
(n) from the correlation.  With the influence of (n) thus
eliminated, the value of m may be determined.  The elimina-
tion of  (n) is obtained by making the following substitution,
                      n = (1-m) + C
                    (29)
where C = a constant whose value,determined from test data,
will be such as to make the above statement valid.
Using this substitution with equation (24) the following lin-
ear equation is obtained after logarithums are taken twice:
                  AT
        log
                e
             2.3 log (f)J
= (1-m) log (q/H) + log (CONSTANT)
                           (30)
where:
        Constant = (q) /k
                         20
Using variable height data with constant hydraulic rate a plot
of equation  (30) will yield  (1-m) as a slope.  At this junc-
ture, no use of the correlation intercept is made as the pur-
pose of the substitution was to remove (n) from the slope and
relocate it in a constant value intercept as part of C.  The
intercept value has no other use in this part of the correla-
tion.
     If data are taken over  a range of hydraulic rates then a
plot may be made separately for each (q) value.  This will pro-
vide a number of intercept values.  These intercept values
may then be related to hydraulic rate in such a way as to
yield the numerical value of C.
        log
   C log(q) + log l/k2Q   (31)
Log  (q)°/k20 is obtained  as  the  intercept value  from prior
use  of equation (30).  Tower performance on  the  treatment of
black liquor from Eckenfelder  (8)  is  shown in Figure 10.  Data
for  an integrated kraft mill effluent, Quirk (9),  is shown on
Figure 11.  Again n  =  1.0 and  a  k£Q = 0.056  gpm/CF is deter-
mined.
     Experience of the authors has shown that unless tower
operation  is below a minimum wetting  rate or there is a
                            1028

-------
          Pol van a (I)

          H  3.3  to  18.V
          q  .75  to  3.0 gom/SF
          m  = o
          n  = 1
          kin =  .056 gpm/CF <2<(0C>
                037 gom/CF (390O
    Figure 10   Treatment  of Black Llauor on a Polygrld Tower  (3)
 t;

1
 x
                                                  I   I  i  i i  i
            Integrated Kraft  19)

            H - 21'
            a « 1  to 3.25 gom/SF
            T -
                26 to
            n « 1.0
            k2Q - .019 9Dm/CF
             -i	1—>—i  i  i  i i i	1	1—i  i  i  i  i i
                                «-0                         10
      Figure  II   Treatment of Integrated Kraft  Effluent on
                  Q SurfDac Toxer (5)
                         1029

-------
                  -1—I—I  I I  I I
         Scnultze HO)

         Sewage » wtiey
         6' Filter
         3/1"-1 1/2" Stone
         Temperature Unknown
         n * 0.51
         kt « .056 gom/CF
                             .10

                              u
   Figure 12   Hhey and Sewage'Treated on a Gravel Packed
              Filter  (10)
sooo
1000
        Heat Processing wastewaters (11)
        Unsteady State .Operation
        Influent BOD changes every 30 mm.
        Unsettled Influent •
        Settled  Influent —
        Settled  influent —
        Settled  influent —
• kt
-kt
                        .027 gom/CF
                        .017 gpffl/CF
                        -"22 9OT/CF
                        .020 qpni/CF_
                                           "•  n - 1.0
                                              H - 20.0'
                                              q - 0.85 9Pfn
                              -»oo-

                                I
                              3OOO
                               10OO
                8* ng/l
                              10.000

                               1000
                                                       10.000
     Figure 13
unsteady Stdte Treatment  of  Meat Processing
Hastewaters on a 20 ft.  Tower  (11)
                         1030

-------
malfunction in the hydraulic distribution, the value of m will
equal 0 and n = 1.0 when dealing with vertical sheet flow
packing.
     When working with random packing, values of n<1.0 will
be obtained.  The data of Schultze (10) treating sewage plus
whey on a 6'deep gravel packed filter are shown on Figure 12.
The 3/4 to. 1 1/2" stone media provided a specific surface
area computed at 36 SF/GF.  Filter operation covered a range
in hydraulic loading of from 0.0375 to .375 gpm/SF.  An (n)
value less than 1.0 is evident.  A reaction rate of.056 gpm/
CF was determined.
     The doctoral thesis data of Hoodie (11) allows an exam-
ination of the correlation technique when applied to unsteady
state performance.  Using a 3 sq/ft tower, 20' high, Hoodie
experimented with meat processing wastewaters with a COD of
up to 5000 mg/1.  Hydraulic rates varied from 0.56 to 1.27
gpm/SF and an intermediate effluent sampling point at 12' was
used.  Every 30 minutes the COD o,f the influent was changed
while the hydraulic rate remained constant.  The response of
the tower to these variations in loading is shown in Figure
13.  Effluent concentration (S$) is related to influent concen-
tration (Sa) using a First Order Reaction and equation (24).
Even though there is considerable scatter in some of the data,
the general applicability of the correlation is evident.
     A comparison of unsteady state reaction rates with hy-
draulic loading and influent concentration variations is pro-
ivded in Table 2 and demonstrates 'that with careful sampling
technique, stable performance data can be obtained from
unsteady-state operation.  Where such control can not be ob-
tained, as  in a field installation which is not used for a
Ph.D. thesis, much more variation in unsteady-state perfor-
mance can be expected.  This is illustrated in Figure 14 for
yeast fermentation effluent treated in a  21 pilot tower re-
ceiving continuously variable flows and influent concentra-
tions, Quirk (7).  The inclined plane data previously refer-
enced on Figure 8 were superimposed on the pilot plant data.
The scale-up calculations described above were used.  The lab-
oratory k'of 9 x 10~3 scaled-up to 0.180 Ibs/CF/day.  Figure
14 illustrates that on the average the unsteady-state field
data group  around the scale-up line from the laboratory plane.
     An additional aspect of hydraulic loading is illustrated
in studies  of Eckenfelder (15).  Eckenfelder utilized a pilot
plant equipped with a vertically oriented asbestos packing,
operating over 7 to 1 height change, and 3 to 1 variation in
hydraulic loading.  His data are presented in Figure 15.
                             1031

-------
BO



40



30



20
           Yeast Fermentation Hostewaters 
-------
                         Table.2          •

        , :  Applications of First Order Reaction
      Correlation to Unsteady-State Operation after
                       Hoodie (11)
   Hydraulic
   Rate
Tower
Height
COD
Range
Reaction
Rate
   0.56 gpm/SF      20.0'
   0.85 gpm/SF      20.0'
   1.27 gpm/SF      20.0'
            1750-4800 mg/1 0.017 gpm/CF
            1400-4000 mg/1 0.022 gpm/CF
            1750-3000 mg/1 0.020 gpm/CF
     It is seen'that a volumetric loading rate of between 0.15
and 0.20 gpm/CF on abrupt change occurs in the value of the
hydraulic coefficient (n).   Above this threshold value and (n)
of 1.0 fit the data quite well.  Below it the n decreased to
.50.  This indicates that at some limiting value of hydraulic
loading n will decrease below 1.0 in response to poor wetting
efficiency and flow channeling which prevents uniform slime
growth throughout the tower.

Process Design

     The previous illustrations of correlation approaches and
data fitting procedures underscore the fact that determina-
tion of the proper model is of paramount importance.  In a
similar manner, it is necessary that laboratory and/or pilot
scale studies incorporate the full range of design variables.
Extraplotation beyond the confines of measured data can be
risky at best.
     The effect of recirculation on design capability is a
topic of particular concern in process design.  Conflicting
data and opinions populate the literature.  Recirculation de-
creases the detention time while increasing the velocity of
flow &turbulent transport of BOD to the slime/liquid interface
which are opposing effects.  A minimum hydraulic loading is
necessary for through wetting and this can be provided by re-
cycle.  In order to approach the recycle question properly it
is necessary that recirculation over a wide range be utilized
in treatability studies so that data exist for recycle ratios
in excess of those ultimately selected for final design.  With
these data in hand, process models may be employed to determine
                           1033

-------
 Che  net  effect  of recirculation.
      Using the  first order model  as an illustration,  the pro-
 cess design calculation re-express the recycle/efficiency
 function (f)  as follows:
          f  =
               "
     1 +
                     (1-E)   =  EC + r
      (1+r)  (1-E)
                                 1+r
                                         (32)
Where Ec  relates to BOD removal efficiency i.e.,

          Ec  =  (1/1-E)

 and  allows topography  to be  simplified as the design analysis
 precedes.  The concept of a  unit  volume of tower per unit 'of
 raw  wastewater flow is then  introduced.  Equation (33)  is em-
 ployed to obtain a ratio of  these unit volumes with and with-
 out  recirculation.   The final relationship between unit vol-
 umes is  shown  below:
where:
^   = (1 + r)  (C   )                     (33)
* o               **

V = the unit volume when recirculation
    is practiced

VQ= the unit volume without recirculation

C   = a sensitivity constant for a given
  '   efficiency and recycle ratio
     When the constant (CE?r)  equals its  maximum value of 1.0,
 the unit  volume required with  recirculation varies  directly
 in proportion with the arithmetic effect  of recycle i.e.-^^=
 (1 + r).   At  constant  values less than 1.0 the increase in
 tower volume  is reduced below  that dictated by hydraulic
 through-put ratio.   This metigation effect is  formulated for
 a first order reaction as follows:
                       (Ec+r
                   log   1 + r
                  [log    (Ec)  J
                        1/n
                                        (34)
Using  a vertically oriented  media and  an  n value of 1.0,  the
value  of  (Cg  r) will vary with design  efficiency as illustrat-
ed  on  Figure  16.   While the  impact of  recirculation is  reduc-
ed  on  Figure  16 as recycle ratio  increases, total tower volume
                            1034

-------
 UJ
o
    1.0
   0.9
   0.8
    0.7
   0.6
   O.5
   0.4
    0.3
   0.2
Recirculotlon Effects
         on
Trickling Filter Volume
First Order Reaction
n = 1.0
      0123466

                           <1 -f r)


      Figure  16    Recirculation Effects on Trickling Filter
                   Volumes
                         1035

-------
experiences a net increase.  Unit volume ratios are compared
with design efficiency requirements and recycle ratios in a
general manner on Table 3.  The analysis shows that recircu-
lation effects are moderate only for low removal efficiency
or tower performance as a pretreatment or roughing unit.
     At (n) values less than 1.0 the effects of recycle are
much reduced over these shown on Table 5 .  For example, at
n = 0.50 the unit volume ratio approaches 1.0 even though ef-
ficiency is 90% and a recycle ratio of 2.0 is used.  This may
be compared with a volume ratio of 1.7 under comparable con-
ditions when n = 1.0.  However, this can be only an apparant
volume reduction in that at n values less than 1.0 tower
media is not being used effectively and the value of k2Q will
be reduced.  This can offset the reduced effects of recycle
usage.
     A similar process design approach is used for the alter-
native reaction models.  Unit volume relationships for these
models are shown on Table A.
     A summary of reaction rates and reaction models for in-
dustrial effluents is presented on Table 5.  In each case
sited, tower media was of-the vertically oriented type.
                            1036

-------
                      Table 3



               Effect of Recirculation

                         on

                Tower Unit Volume

              First Order Reaction

                      n = 1.0
Efficiency
   90
   90
   90
   90

   50
   50
   50
   50
Recycle
Ratio(r)

   1
   2
   3
   4

   1
   2
   3
   4
Unit Volume
Ratio (V/VQ)

  1.48
  1.80
  2.04
  2.25

  1.18
  1.23
  1.29
  1.30
                       1037

-------
                           Table 4
                 Effect  of  Recirculation
                            on
Reaction Models  n = 1
1. Zero Order     1.0         1.0
2. First Order   (1+r)       (1+r)

3. Simple Retardant 1.0       1.0
4. Concentration (1+r)       (1+r)
   Dependent
   Tower Unit Volumes
Basic Multiplier  Efficiency Recycle Constant
           n = n     n=l        n = n
                      1.0
log (EC)
. i.o
   '/E^+r
   i.o
"    ,Ec-frv
log (- --[+r )
                                          1/n
                                log  (Ec)
                              1/n
                                       log (Ec)
   1.0
   E +r
   E (I+r)
                                           1/n
                           1038

-------
 c
 0)
 D
w
         o
         C--J
 cx~
 60

rH  CN  r-^  -cr  OO  
 CO
 C
 O
o
 CO
Pi
 C
 O
 CO
 CO
 I-
 o
 l-l
 a>
-a
                        4-1
                        CO
                                                       o
                                                       t-l
 l-l
 cu
"0
 S-i
o
                                CO
                                l-l
                                •H
                                                                               o
                         CU

                         o
                        E-i
                                0)

                                g
 M
 cu
TJ
            4-1
            CO
            l-l
            •H
            PL.
                                            t-l
                                            cu



4-1
C
CU
^
r-H
T3
4J
>-l
60
0!
4-1
c
hi
i-H
f__{
•H
^
4-1
14-1
CO
l-l


< « O O Pd PM t

rH
iH
e
rH   C
•H   CU

    rH
 00 4-1
 Cfl  14-1
on  w
                                            J-l  CO
                                            cfl  cO
                                            O &
                                                                    O -H
                                                                                t-l
                                                                               o
                                                                                cu
                                                                               Nl
            l-l
            0)
            "O

            o

            o

            01
            Nl
                                    cu
                                    C
                                    co
C
o
•H
4-1
Cfl
±J
C
cu
e

01
p£t

4-1
CO
CO
cu
>"







^|
cu
4-1
Cfl -
^
CU
4-1
CO
cfl

c
o
•H
4J
CO
C
0)
£
£4
0)
PL,

4-1
CO
Cfl
CU-








l-l
CU
4-1
CO
S
cu
4-J
CO
cfl
S
        W
                                1039

-------
u
           o
           00
                      o
                             tx.
                             o
                         p-
                         o
                                     oo
                                00 ,

                                oo
                                                   00
                                                          fn
                                                          c/1
                                                                    13

                                                                    En
 (U
                                                           C 13
                                                           Qj  C
                                                           O  0)
                                                           C  D.
                                                           O •
                                                          O O
                                                                     N)
 0)
                                                          P.,
 u>

•H
 (A
 U  CO
 O  -P
 M  C
 PH  0)
 cd
 a)
•P  ^
-------
                          References
1.   Hoehn, R.C.  and Roy, A.O.   "Effect of thickness of Bacter-
    ial Film" Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federa-
    tion, 45, 1973.

2.   Quirk, T.P.  "Whey Effluent-Packed Tower Trickling Filtra-
    tion" EPA Water Pollution Control Research Series No.
    12130 DUJ, 1971.

3.   .Shulze, V.L.  "Experimental Vertical Screen Trickling Fil-
    ter" Sewage and Industrial Wastes, 29.. 1957.

4.   Maieir, W.J., "Mass Transfer and Growth Kinetics on a Slime
    Layer, A Simulation of the Trickling Filter" Ph.D. Thesis,
    Cornell University, N.Y., 1966.

5.   Oleszkiewicz, J.A. , and Eckenfelder, W.W. , "The Mechanism
    of Substrate Removal in High Rate Platic Media Trickling
    Filters" Technical Report No. 33, Dept. of Environmental
    and Water Resources Engineering, Vanderbilt University.

6.  Quirk, Lawler  and Matusky Engineers Technical Report, 1970.

7.  Quirk, Lawler  and Matusky Engineers Technical Report, 1970.

8.  Eckenfelder, W.W. ,  and Barnhart E.L. "Performance of High
    Rate  Trickling Filter using Selected Media" Journal of
    Water Pollution Control Federation, December,  1965.

9.  Technical Association of  the  Pulp and  Paper Industry-Pilot
    Plant Studies,  1967.

10. Shulze,  K.L. "Coal and  Efficiency of Trickling Filters"
    Journal  of  the Water Pollution  Control Federation,  32,
                        ~      '
 11.  Moodie,  S.P.,  "The Design of  High Rate Trickling  Filters"
     Ph.D.  Thesis,  University of Queensland,  Australia,  1981.
                             1041

-------
              TREATMENT OF COKE PLANT WASTEWATERS

                      IN PACKED BED REACTORS



            MEINT OLTHOF. INDUSTRIAL WASTE SECTION
              DUNCAN, LAGNESE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

           JAN OLESZKIEWICZ. INDUSTRIAL WASTE SECTION
              DUNCAN, LAGNESE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

           WILLIAM R. O'DONNELL. LEOPOLD COMPANY
     The  treatment of  wastewaters originating  from  coke
oven  operations  has  been  studied  in  a  wide  variety  of
biological  treatment  operations.   Most of  these  studies
have  shown  that  this  wastewater is  biodegradable to  a
large  extent  and  that  given  enough  acclimation,   the
bacteria can develop to fully treat compounds like phenol,
cyanides'  and   thiocyanates.    The   work  that  will  be
presented  ,in  this  paper  describes  the  results  of  a
treatability  study  of  wastewaters  originating  from  a
benzol plant in an upflow biotower (UBT).  The wastewater
constituents are  the  same as  for coke  oven wastewater,
except that  most  of the constituents are present in some-
what  lower  concentrations.   The biotower  used  in  this
study  is  a biological  treatment  process  developed by the
Leopold Company  and operates more or less like a reversed
flow  trickling  filter.   The  tower is  packed, with random
plastic  medium,   the  influent  flows  upward  and  air  is
supplied  by  aeration through a  filter underdrain system.
This paper will present the results of the treatability of
benzol plant wastewater in this  reactor.    The main  pur-
pose  of this study was  to determine'the  loading at which
the  phenol  was  virtually  completely removed from  the
influent.  The data obtained in this study will be
                        1042

-------
compared with studies  performed  by other researchers with
similar  wastewater  in activated  sludge  and with  other
types  of  fixed  film  reactors.   In this  way, it will  be
possible  to .compare  the  performance  of  the  different
biological treatment reactors available.

EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP

     The work  conducted  in  this project was  done  with a
pilot  unit  of the  upflow biotower (UBT).  Figure  lisa
schematic diagram  of  the  pilot  plant  set-up.   The tower
had dimensions of  2 x 3 x 10 ft. high and was filled with
39 ft.   of  random,, plastic medium with a specific surface
area  of 30  ft /ft  .   The  air  was distributed  through a
filter  underdrain  at a rate  of  2-5 scfm/ft .   The  waste-
water  was  fed at  varying flow  rates  (0.5-2  gpm) through
the  tower.  ~The. waste  characteristics  of  the influent to
the UBT  are  shown  in Table I.   It shows  that the•average
soluble  organic  carbon (SOC) concentration  is  435 mg/1.
The  COD is  about 1500 mg/1.  'This strength is about half
of  waste  ammonia   liquor.    The  average  phenol  concen-
tration was  only 36 mg/1, which  is significantly less than
in waste  ammonia  liquor.   The fact that the ratio between
COD  and phenol in  this waste  is  so  much  higher than in
normal  waste ammonium liquor,   indicates  that  the waste
from  the  benzol   plant  contains  many  more   organics  in
addition  to  phenol,  while  waste ammonia•liquor, primarily
contains, phenols as the organic material.  Other specific
organics analyzed to be present  in this waste are benzene,
toluene  and  napthalene.     The  concentrations  from grab
samples  for  these  specific organics during this study are
also  shown in Table I.  The pilot plant was started up  by
feeding  activated  sludge   from an  existing  wastewater
treatment plant'treating  coke oven wastewater.  The phenol
removal  was virtually complete  a few days  after  adding
seed  to the tower.   During the pilot  study, the reactor
was fed hydraulically  with 0.5,  1 and 2 gpm of wastewater.
The  influent values  fluctuated  throughout this period so
that  the organic  load also  fluctuated from  day  to day.

RESULTS OF THIS STUDY

      The  results  of  this study showed  that  the organics
present in this wastewater  are very well biodegradable and
that  it is  possible to treat this wastewater biologically
                         1043

-------
                               NUTRIENT
                              FEED TANK
                              ( PHOSPHORIC
                                 ACID)
        RAW
     WASTE WATER
        55 GAL.
         DRUM
55 GAL.
 DRUM
 PRIMARY
CLARIFIER
                      EFFLUENT
                  VENT
 FINAL
EFFLUENT
1 l_S_._r_^-
• —

r
L^^TP
_T^ -^

FINAL
CLARIFIER
'I
BIO-
TOWER
39 ft'3
(6.5 ft H
PACKING)
6ft2
AREA
^
-co
-co
-co
t ^
AIP
                            2-5 SCFM/ffs
                       FIGURE I

            LAYOUT OF THE PILOT PLANT
                      1044

-------
                         TABLfi  I
INFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
Parameter
Suspended Solids
Oil and Grease
Phenol
SOC (Soluble Organic Carbon)
SCN
CN - Free
CN - Total
BOD5
COD
NH4-N
Sulfides
Grab Sample
OF WASTEWATER
50 % Value*
50
32
36
435
63
11.3
21.8
700
1500
42
40 -

TO UBT
90% Value*
N/A
200
67
630
102
18
33.4
995
2300
85
64

Benzene

Toluene

Naphtalene
208

 30
*  50% Value:   Mean concentration from a probability plot.

   90% Value:   Indicates the concentration that is not
                exceeded in 90% of the samples analyzed.
                         1045

-------
to  a  very  high  extent.   The  probability curve  for the
percentage  SOC  removal  is  shown  in Figure 2.   Typical
removal percentages  for  the various  parameters  are shown
                The  hydraulic  load  was   1 gpm/39 ft   or
                       The corresponding   average  organic
load   was   120 Ib  SOC/1000 ftj   day   or  400 Ib   COD/
in  Tableau.
37 gpd/ft   reactor.
       was
1000 ft -day.
                          TABLE II
        PILOT BIOTOWER LOADINGS AND OBTAINED REMOVALS
                   DURING RUN III - 1 GPM
  Parameter

SOC

CODf


BOD5,f
CN-Free-Filtered

CN-Total-Filtered

Phenols-Filtered

SCN-Filtered

NH4+

Sulfides
                          Mean Loading
                         lbs/1000 ft -d

                                135

                                462

                                216

                                3.5

                                6.7

                               11.1

                               19.5

                                 13

                                4.2
   Mean
Removal (%)

      57

      ,63

     •5.1

      71

     75.2

     99.91

      61

       0

      73
     In  Figure 3 the  percentage  SOC  removal  is  plotted
versus the effluent phenol concentration.  This shows that
as  long  as  at  least  40-50% of  the  SOC is  removed,  the
effluent phenol  concentration is  very  low.    The  removal
of free cyanides was not complete at the loadings at which
the  plant  was  operated.   Based  on performance of  other
systems,  however, it  is  felt that free cyanide is  totally
                         1046

-------
LL)
£E
   IOO-
   90 -
   80 .-
   70 -
   60-
O
8. 50'
   40 -
   30-
    20+	l-l-l—I—I—I	1	1	1	1— I—I—I—I	1	1—I
     O.OI O.O5 O.2 O.5 I  2   5   IO  2O 30 4O 5O 60 70 80  90 95
                         FIGURE 2
             CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
               OF PERCENTAGE SOC REMOVAL
                       DURING RUN HI
                     1047

-------
0 +
  0
10   20   30   40   50  60  70   80   90
        % SOC REMOVAL
                 FIGURE 3
       EFFLUENT PHENOL  CONCENTRATION
               AS A FUNCTION OF
           PERCENTAGE SOC REMOVAL
               1048

-------
biodegradable,  provided the  loading is  low enough-.  The
same  is  true  for;thiocyanates.    (See Discussion section.)
  :.  The  only  nutrient required for this waste stream was
phosphorus.   This  was added  at such a concentration that
the  effluent  phosphorus  concentration was  maintained at
;,1 - 2 mg/1.   This   required  on  the average  only 5 mg/1.
     The  amount  of sludge :generated in this  system ;repre-
sente,d, a  yield factor based  on *a BOD  basis 'of'about 50%.
This, "-is   comparable to  conventional nigh-rate biological
systems.   The  loading -,at which  this-  sludge  yield  was
obtained  was quite .high  (216  Ib BOD /1000 ft-/day).
     The  air requirements  for this  unit were  comparable to
activated sludge.   ^The  DO concentration in the  effluent
was normally high  (6X7,, mg/1)  and  therefore in the  scale-up
of  the  system, it  is  possible  to reduce the  amount  of air
required  under normal  .operating conditions.
     Throughout  the  course 'of  this six-month _. study, it
never proved  to be necessary to  backflush the tower.  The
excess  sludge sloughed off at  a  sufficient-rate  to main-
tain a good flow and  aeration throughout the  system.   The
upflow flowrate  through the tower  was about  0.16  gpm/ft  .
     Throughout  this  project,  the  unit  suffered several
shock loads as result  of  leaks  or spills in  the'plant  from
where  the waste  originated. .:•..The  unit  showed  remarkable
potential for  quick, recovery.  Figure 4 shows a few cases
where  the SOC jumped up  from  one  day  to another and the
effluent   SOC   value  also "jumped  up.   However,  .after
stabilizing  the, influent  condition, the effluent of the
biotower   recovered  rapidly.  Throughout  this  study,  the
phenol  concentration  in  the  effluent  was  * only in two
effluent  samples above  1  mg/1.   In each case, the  phenol
concentration  was below"1  mg/1  the  following day.
     The  kinetics  of  this system can  be expressed by the
equation

                     S  /S   = EXP(-K/L)
                      e  o

where S   is the  effluent  concentration, S  is the  influent
       e                                  o
concentration, K is a  constant, L ,is loading.  By  plotting
log S /S   versus 1/L,  it is possible to obtain the value
of  the  removal coefficient.   This  is done in Figure 5 and
it  shows  a  removal coefficient  of K = 0.18 Ib/cu. ft/day.
                          104?

-------
                    4
   I—I —I—I—I—I—I—l-*f ~
     ro
EWOOOI/sqi 9NIQVO1 DOS
^—i_l_i_4co —*•
Q  o o  o o
*  S £  Q 8

  iNarruda oos
                                                        LJ
                                                        a:

                                                     Ld
                                                     CC


                                                           CO
                                                        o
                                                        en
                               1050

-------
   IOOO--
    9OO -f
    800 7
    7OOT
    600 j

    500y

    4OO-r
O
8
2
UJ
'
 .
 U.
 LL)

 O)
 cn
    200-
)OO
90
80
70
60

5O
    REMOVAL
    COEFFICIENT
    K = O.I83lbs./ft3-d
                                                   (25,96)
FLOW RAW/RECYCLE

•  1.0:0 RUN HE

   I.O:I.O RUN H
                                        12
                                              14
                                              16    18
                         I/L (d-ft3/lbs)
                       : LOAD lb/ft3DAY
                              FIGURE 5

                      KINETICS OF SOC REMOVAL

                    IN THE PACKED  BED  REACTOR
                        1051

-------
DISCUSSION

     It  is  possible  to  compare  the performance  of this
upflow  biotower with  results  reported by  other investi-
gators  of  other  biological  systems.   Since  the  main
objective  of  various  biological  systems  is to  have  the
highest  organic loading  and the  smallest  possible volume
and  still  provide a stable operation,  the  results of all
data that will be discussed in this paper are expressed in
terms  of  performance  versus  volumetric  organic  load.
Activated sludge data can be converted to this by assuming
that the activated sludge concentration is 3 g/1 of active
biomass.    The  results  for  COD  removal  are plotted  in
Figure 6' and  it shows  that the performance  of  the UBT is
quite  favorable.   The  performance  of activated  sludge is
very  close to  the  packed  bed  reactor,  but  one  of  the
disadvantages   of   activated   sludge,   i.e.  the  sludge
settling,  has been avoided.  Also, for an industrial type
of  operation,  it is felt that a  fixed film bioreactor is
more suitable to handle shock loads.
     The  removal of CN and SCN  was  only partial  at the
organic loadings the plant was operated.  Generally, these
components are biodegradable at lower loadings.  Figures 7
and  8  show the percentages removal  and the effluent con-
centrations for  these parameters  as a function of loadings
for  several  types  of  systems.   These data  show  quite a
fluctuation   between  the  various   reported  data.   In
general,  the  breakdown of  CN and  SCN are  thought to be
totally-  degradable  at  lower   loadings   (<200 Ib  COD/
1000 ft /day).   The CN  removal  data  are  more scattered
than the SCN  data because of inconsistency in reporting CN
as  total  or free.  Only  the free cyanide is biodegradable
and  therefore  in cases  with  a  large fraction of fixed
cyanide,  the  percentage removal  will be low.  Why  in some
cases  SCN  is  not  totally removed  at  low  loadings  is
uncertain.  Some research conducted  in this area  seems to
direct  the  focus to certain environmental conditions (pH,
phenol, ammonia  concentration) but no  total picture is yet
available on  SCN oxidation  (refence  17).
     The  effluent  phenol concentration is  of  importance
since BAT guidelines require very low limits  (0.025 mg/1).
This is not easily  met  with a biological system.  Figure  9
shows the effluent  phenol concentration for various
                          1052

-------
LJ
OC.

Q
O
O
100-


90T
so

70-
6Oj

50 y

40--
REFERENCES
PBR-A-7HIS STUDY
A.S. - 1,2,35,6,7,9,II,I2S,13
RBC-3,12
TF-  5
                            •I-
            IOO
                    2OO
                                 •I-
                            3OO
                                   4OO
                     COD  LOADING
                   Ib / IOOO ft3/ DAY
                                           5OO     6OO
                             FIGURE 6
                        COD REMOVAL VERSUS
                     ORGANIC  LOAD  FOR VARIOUS
                        BIOLOGICAL  REACTORS
                     .  1053

-------




^
o
5
UJ
o:
"Z.
o



_,
X
o
!E
*^
u
,
2
UJ
_|
U.
u.
LU


IOO -
9O -

8O -
70 -

60 -

50 •
4O •
30 •
10 -
6 -
5 -

4 -

3 -

Z -
«c
1 -
O.8 •
O.6 •
O.4
0.2-
-
(2)®^ REFERENCES
Q PBR - A-THIS STUDY
Q® ff. AS - 1, 2, 3S, 7,9,11,125,15
• ©^D ^© RBC-3,12
® © © ®




©
.©©©©© © .
i 1.1 i
L ©
- (J)
CUD


®(A)
^^ISS^-N (Ss)
V->(9) V_x

i (D (TTiCD
0 ^^
CD
- © © ^-\
w
- dXD®, ©
D IOO 2OO 3OO 40O 5


























DO
 COD LOADING
Ib/ IOOO ft3/DAY

          FIGURE 7
     CN REMOVAL VERSUS
 ORGANIC LOAD FOR VARIOUS
    BIOLOGICAL REACTORS
   1054

-------





_J
^
O
5E
tr.
z

a*



_J
O
s
2
&
i—
LU
Z>
_l
tj
UJ



7~T9J — x^v^vC\§/T9Tx§? 	 x — v.

90 -@ k^S'Sg) A3*
I/[7\(^) ^^
vJy^-^ fin
80 -
70 •


6O •
5O •

40 •

3O •
20 •
640-
32O-
160-
80 -
40-
20 -

IO-

5 -
O -
\^s


s~\ ' ' f(b
(D

REFERENCES
PBR- A- THIS STUDY
AS - 3S,4, 6,7, 8, 9, II1, 125,14,15
V$ RBC- 3,12 . ,
1 i i i
r 1 1 1 |

®
' ® ©
•(D
©
(D

• © ® .-^
s~\ (5s) /~\ —
@®® ®
®cl)®(6) (D ,

0 IOO 2OO 3OO 4OO 5C
  COD LOADING
 Ib/ 1000 ftVDAY

       FIGURE 8
  SCN REMOVAL VERSUS
ORGANIC LOAD FOR VARIOUS
  BIOLOGICAL REACTORS
    1055

-------
too
            REFERENCES      :
            PBR - A-THIS STUDY
            AS - 1,2,35,4,7,8,9,10,11,125,14
            RBC-3,12
               © (5s)
               •I-
200
               30O
               4OO
        COD  LOADING
      Ib / IOOO ft3 /DAY
500
                                     600
                FIGURE 9

         PHENOL REMOVAL VERSUS
       ORGANIC  LOAD FOR VARIOUS
          BIOLOGICAL REACTORS
           1056

-------
studies.   The figure  shows  only 3  effluent values below
0.05 mg/1.    It  is  difficult  to  predict  what will  be
required  to,  get  these  very low effluent  phenol concen-
trations.    Low  loadings  is  obviously a prerequisite but
this seems to be no guarantee for low phenol effluent con-
centration.   The .analytical  techniques used for analyzing
phenol  could  have  a  large. ,: implication  at  these  low
residual values.                       /     ,
     One factor that requires some additional study is the
anticipated  improvement  in overall  performance by staging
UBT  reactors.   As with plug  flow versus completely mixed
i't  is  felt  that  by operating 2 reactors  in  series,  the
effluent  quality  will be, better  than  with 1 reactor with
the  same  volume as  the  2 reactors  combined.   With fixed
film reactors, there is more, of an opportunity, for special
groups  of  bacteria to be growing  in  certain sections of
the   reactors.    In  batch   tests,  it  has  been  shown
(reference 16) that the   sequence of bio-oxidation of the
pollutants  in  coke  oven wastewater   is.  phenol-cyanide-
thiocyanate.   By  staging  reactors,  it  is  possible  to
simulate this type of ;0peration.
     Another  factor that  shows  promise for optimizing the
performance  of the  UBT is by reducing the energy require-
ment per pound  of COD removed by increasing the height of
the tower.  By increasing the height, the air has a longer
detention  time  and the  packing  should  ensure  a tortuous
path  of the  air.   Both  factors seem to work  toward an
energy  efficient  reactor.  No data are yet available on
this but intuitively this approach should be advantageous.

CONCLUSIONS        '        '  . '   . ':
     The  UBT  proved  to  be  an  efficient  reactor  for
     biological degradation of benzol wastewater.  Organic
     loadings as  high  as .300 Ib COD/1000 ft /day resulted
     in 70% or higher COD removal.

     The percentage removal of CN and SCN was about 60-70%
     at the  loadings at  which the  reactor  was operated.

     Phenol  is  virtually  completely oxidized as  long as
     the  percentage COD- or  SOC  removal  was  above  50%.
     This  does  not  necess.arily  mean  that the  phenol is
     completely oxidized  but at.  least  the  ring is broken
     and the resulting organic does not register as phenol.
                      1057

-------
REFERENCES
 10.
 11.
 12.
Adams,  C.A.,    R.M.   Stein,    W.   W.   Eckenfelder.
Treatment  of  two  coke   plant   wastewaters  to  meet
guideline    criteria.     Proceedings    29th   Purdue
Industrial Waste Conference, 1974, 864.
Adams, C.A.   Treatment of high strength phenolic and
ammonia   wastestream   by   single  and   multi-stage
activated  sludge processes.   Proceedings  29th Purdue
Industrial Waste Conference, 1974, 617.
Bauer,  G.E.     Biophysical  treatment  of -coke  plant
wastewaters.    Zimpro,   Technical   Bulletin  3250-T.
Bridle,  T.R.,   W.K.  Bedford and  B.E.   Jank.    Bio-
logical  treatment  of  coke  plant  wastewaters   for
control of nitrogen and  trace organics.  53rd Annual
Water  Pollution Control Federation,  September  1980.
British  Coke Research Association.   The biological
treatment  of  coke oven effluent.   Laboratory  and
pilot   plant  studies  using   packed  towers,   Coke
Research Report 52, May 1969.
Cooper, R.L.  and J. R. Catchpole.   Biological treat-
ment  of phenolic  wastes.   Iron and  Steel  Institute
Publication  No. 128, 1970.
Cousins, W.G.,  A.B. Windier.    Tertiary treatment of
weak ammonia liquor.  Journal Water Pollution Control
Federation,  Vol.  44,  No.  4,   April  1972,  p. 607.
Ganczarczyk,   J. ,    D.  Elion.    Extended  aeration of
coke  plant  effluents.  33rd  Purdue Industrial Waste
Conference,  1978,  p. 895.
Jones, L.    Experimental investigations on biological
treatment  of coke  plant ammonia  still effluent.  M.S.
Thesis, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1978.
Kostenbader,  P.D.,   J.W.  Flecksteiner.   Biological
oxidation  of coke  plant weak  ammonia  liquor.  Journal
Water  Pollution Control  Federation,  Vol. 41, No. 2,
February  1969,  p.  199.
Luthy,  R.G.  and J.T.  Tallon.    Experimental analysis
of biological  oxidation characteristics of hygas coal
gasification  wastewater.    Department  of  Energy,
FE-2496-27.
Medwith,  B.W.,  J.F.   Lefelhocz.   Single stage bio-
logical  treatment  of  coke  plant wastewaters  with a
hybrid suspended  growth fixed film  reactor.   36th
Purdue Industrial  Waste Conference, 1981.
                        1058

-------
13.   Olthof,  M. ,   E.  Pearson,  N. Mancuso,   I.  Wittmann.
     Biological   treatment   of   coke   oven   wastewater
     including  provisions  . for  nitrification.   Iron  and
     Steel Engineer, June 1980.
14,   Osantowski, R.,  et.al.   Two stage biological treat-
     ment  of  coke, plant  wastewater.   EPA 600/2-81-052,
     April -1981.   '   '   .-.""   .-'V'     . , .'  :
15.   Wong-Chong,  G.,    S.  :Caruso.    Advanced .biological
     oxidation  of, coke  plant wastewaters  for  the  removal
     of,  nitrogen  compounds.   Carnegie-Mellon  Institute,
     April 1977.         .  ••'  •  •
16.   Wong Chong,  G.    Design and operation of biological
     treatment  for  coke  plant  wastewaters.    Carnegie-
     Mellon Institute, 1978.
17.  'Neufeld,  R.D.    Thiocyanate bio-oxidation kinetics.
     ASCE,  Journal  Environmental  Engineering.  Division,
     Vol. 107, No. 5, October 1981,   p. 1035.  '
                         1059

-------
      TRICKLING FILTER EXPANSION OF POTW BY
             SNACK. FOOD MANUFACTURER
        Michael   R.   Morlinc^,
        Manager,      Wastewater
        Frito-Lay,  Inc.
P.E.,    Group
  Development,
        Samuel   M.   Frenkil,    P.E.    Technical
        Manager,       Environmental       Systems,
        Frito-Lay, Inc.

        Paul  Trahan,   Superintendent,  Killingly
        Water Pollution Control Plant.
INTRODUCTION

    One of Frito-Lay,  Inc.'s  largest  corn and  potato  snack
food   manufacturing   plants   was   recently   opened  in
Killingly,  Connecticut,   about  halfway  between  Hartford,
Connecticut and Providence, Rhode Island.  The decision to
locate  this   plant  in Killingly  required the company to
install on-site primary  treatment as  well as  an  expansion
of  the  publicly owned treatment work's  (POTW's)  secondary
treatment    system.     This    expansion   consisted   of
constructing  a  $1.6 million  trickling filter and  pumping
station.   This  paper  describes  the  joint  effort  between
the  town  of  Killingly  and  Frito-Lay  to   design  these
facilities and  obtain State  approval  to  construct  them,
and reports on system performance to date.

    The  construction  of  a   trickling  filter  or  a  POTW
expansion  is not  unusual.   The  uniqueness   of  this  plan
stems  from  the  fact  that   this  project was  the  first
industrially  designed  and constructed expansion of  a POTW
in  the  State  of Connecticut,  and would  essentially  double
the   capacity   of   the   secondary   system   without   a
comprehensive plant expansion.
                         1060

-------
     There was initial doubt on,the.part of the regulatory
 agencies  concerning  the  success of  this  project ^ since a
 vlnture  of  this kind had  not previously  occurred  in  the
-'Hate  of .Connecticut.   .AEter   careful analysis  of   the
 pfoiect,  all  agencies  and parties approved  this  plan  and
 Se facilities  were  constructed.   This  paper will discuss
 some of  the unique  features  of this cooperative project
 First,  'these   facilities   were   generally   designed  to
 industrial  standards.  Second,  the contractor was  selected
 as  a result of a public bid.   Third,  all  the  Processing
 equipment   was   purchased  ;by   Frito-Lay.   Fourth,  _ the.
 facilities  were  designed, "constructed; and  placed  into
 operation  under  the  supervision of Frito-Lay.  Fifth, _no
 federal  funds  were  involved.,   Sixth,  the  POTW  expansion
 was financed be industrial revenue bonds.

 project  Scoping & Negotiations

      The   town  of KillingLy,  Connecticut   is  located  in
 Windham  County  in the northeast corner of  the  state.   In
  spring  1978, Frito-Lay  selected Killmgly  as  the  site of
  one of   its, new .plants,  .Killingly   offered  convenient
  access  to  the  major   Connecticut,  Massachusetts,  Rhode
  island  and  New  York   markets/  a   solid  work  force,,
  acceptable environmental costs, and strong  interest by the
  town leadership in the  project.

    •  One  of  the .more   complex "issues  to  resolve  was
  treatment  of   Frito-Lay's  1  million  gallon per  day  high
  strength  wasteloads.    A  number  of options  were  studied
  separately  by  Frito-Lay,  and  jointly  with the Killmgly
  Sewer  Authority.   Ultimately,   a decision was  made  for
  Frito-Lay  to  construct a   full  primary  treatment  plant
  on-site,  discharge  the effluent  to  the  sewer system,  and
  build an  expansion  to  the, POTW.   The  back-up  alternative
  was for Frito-Lay to build on-site  secondary treatment and
  discharge  to  the sewer.  This  would  be done if  Frito-Lay
  and  Killingly  could  not  reach   agreement,   unexpected
  technical    problems   arose,,  or    if    costs    became
  uncontrollable.
                           1061

-------
    The  Killingly Sewer  Authority  operates  an 8 million
gallon per  day secondary  treatment plant.   The  POTW was
completed in  1976 with  the  intent of  providing  substantial
reserve capacity in order to provide for  future population
growth  and  to  attract  industry.   This  plant  has  a raw
sewage   lift   station,    primary   settling   tanks,   a
conventional  activated  sludge  system,  secondary  settling
tanks,  and   chlorine   contact  tanks.     Solids   handling
consists  of  thickening both  primary  and  secondary  solids
prior to  dewatering  on rotary  vacuum  filters.   Sludge is
lime   treated,    then   landfilled.    An   on-site .sludge
incinerator will be used  as back-up,  or  when incineration
of  large sludge  volumes  becomes economical.   Frito-Lay's
discharge to  the  POTW would  consist  primarily  of soluble
BOD,  and some  solids.    However,  even with  full primary
treatment of  Frito-Lay's wastewater,  the  POTW  could not
handle the wasteload.   Secondary BOD was  the problem.  An
expansion  to  the  BOD  capacity might  provide   adequate
capacity.  A  study was  initiated  to  investigate  such an
expansion.

    If  a  full  secondary  treatment   system were  to  be
installed on-site by  Frito-Lay, not only might  it cost
more  than an  expansion  of the POTW but it would result in
the  duplication  of  equipment   already  installed  at the
POTW.   In addition,  Frito-Lay  would  have to  cope with
secondary  sludge  disposal.   Costs  were  believed  to  be
compatable  or  significantly   lower,   if  the  POTW was
expanded.   Therefore,  Frito-Lay  agreed   to  design and
construct  a  secondary  pump  station,   a  biofilter  tower,
instruments and controls, sludge piping and related  pumps,
valves,  necessary  appurtenances,  and  modifications  to
appropriate existing components at the POTW.

    The proposal to take an essentially  new and  under-
utilized POTW,  expand  it,  and change  the  process  concepts
was  received  with some  skepticism by  both the Killingly
Sewer   Authority   and    Frito-Lay's   management.     Major
negotiating   and  paperwork  nightmares  were   envisioned.
Project delays would impact Frito-Lay's  start-up.
                           1062

-------
Regulatory  authorities  were  expected   to   question .the
project, even  though no  change  in the NPDES  permit  limits
or requests for federal funds were involved.

POTW Inprovements

    Parallel  to  examining  these procedural  questions,  the
Killingly  Sewer   Authority,   the  town's  consultants,   and
Frito-Lay's  engineers  began  unit-by-unit  analyses of  the
POTW.   Numerous   meetings  and  iterations  were  involved.
The  final result  was  a  decision  to expand  the POTW  by
adding  a pump  station,  a  packed  media  trickling  filter
tower,  and assorted  controls.  The  POTW  would be converted
from  activated  sludge  to   a   trickling  filter/roughing
filter   process.    The  BOD  capacity  would   be  almost
doubled.  All  other  systems  were analyzed to  be adequate.
Long  term marginal  capacity in  clarifiers  and flotation
units might  be a  problem  if the  city and  Frito-Lay  both
reached  ultimate capacity.   However,  since  this  event  is
anticipated to be at least 10 years  in the  future, work on
these systems was deferred.

    The  selected  option called  for  converting  the  POTW
from   a  conventional   activated  sludge   system  to   a
biofliter/activated  sludge  system.    These  improvements  to
the  Killingly  POTW almost  doubled the BOD capacity  of the
secondary  system  (from  8,000  to   15,700  Ib/day)   and
retained  its current  peak hydraulic  capacity of  24  mgd.
These  benefits  were  achieved  by  constructing  a  minimum
number  of units.   However,  because the original plant was
not  designed with this type  of expansion in mind, many of
the  connections   and  modifications   were   difficult   and
expensive.

    The  pump   station   utilizes  five  constant  speed,
submersible  pumps  to lift  the primary effluent  to the top
of the  biofilter  tower.    Capacity  of  the  pump station
varies  4,700  gpm with  one   pump  running,   to  17,000  gpm
under  peak flow conditions.   This allows hydraulic wetting
rate  to be varied from  1.2  to  4.2 gpm/sf  of surface  area
                           1063

-------
of  the   biofilter.    The   puinp   station  utilizes   simple
controls  consisting of  On/Off  switches coupled  to low-
level and high-level  sensors.   One of the  five  pumps will
be connected to  the treatment plant's standby generator  so
that process integrity is maintained  in  the event of power
outage.   The  number  of  pumps  in  operation   will vary
according  to  flow conditions,  but under peak design flows
only four  pumps  will  operate with the remaining pump held
in reserve to comply with State regulations.

    The discharge  manifold, gate  valves  and check  valves
are  contained  in  a vault  adjacent  to  the pump  statioti.
Access  to this  vault  is via  two large  doors.   The pump
station was  constructed of reinforced  concrete.  The wet
well and  effluent channel  are  open but  are protected  by
handrails.   An  overhead electric  hoist was  provided   to
facilitate pump  maintenance.  All the  pump starters and
controls  are  located  in   a  NEMA  14  enclosure,  installed
between the pump station and the biotower.

    The   biofilter  tower   is   approximately 70  feet   in
diameter  and  28  feet  tall.  The  biological growth  media
consists   of  horizontal  redwood   slats.    The  media,  is
supported  by  pressure  treated  fir  stringers   which are
supported  by a  concrete  underdirain system.   Media depth  is
21.5 feet  resulting in a net media volume  of 80,000 cubic
feet.   The   tower  walls  were   constructed  of   precast
concrete  panels  trimmed with   face  brick  to   match the
existing  plant  structures.   The  design   loading  is 200
pounds BOD per  1000 cubic  feet and 65%  removal  efficiency
is projected.  In  sizing the tower, it was  assumed  that  no
additional BOD  from Frito^Lay  would  be  removed  across the
existing POTW primary treatment system.

    Wastewater is  uniformly distributed  over the media  by
a   four-arm   rotating   distributor.   As   the   wastewater
splashes  through the  biofilter,  bio-solids (microbes and
bacteria)  form  on  the  media  and reduce   the BOD   of the
primary effluent.   Bio-tower effluent is returned via the
                          10P4

-------
underdrain  system to  the pump -station.   A  broad-crested
weir  divides  this   flow  with  a  portion  being  recycled
through  the  tower   to  "seed"  the  process   at  a  typical
internal  recycle rate  of  3:1  to  5:1.   This  serves  to
increase  removal efficiency and  dampen shock loads.   The
remainder  of the bio-tower  effluent flows  by gravity  to
the aeration basin (existing) for further treatment.

    In  order  to  convert   the   Killingly   POTW   from  an
activated  sludge to  a  biofilter/activated  sludge  system,
substantial  improvements,  additions, and renovations  were
made  to existing components.  More  than half, the cost  of
the expansion project involved such "remodeling"  items  as:

    0   Removal   and   relocation  of  major   slide  gates,
        valves, and piping connections (30 and 36-inch).

    0   Removal   of   existing  primary  to  aeration  basin
        piping,  and   routing  a 24"  pipe  to  the  new  pump
        station.   Several  other  pipes  were  rerouted  to
        achieve this.

    0   Core  bore gallery walls  to  allow  for 36"  piping
        extensions  to   the   new   pump  station,   and  then
        reconstruct the walls.

    0   Route  36"   return   pipe   from   biofilter  through
        existing   pipe  gallery   to  two   aeration   basin
        division   boxes,   including   36"  valves  and  other
        miscellaneous connections.    Stainless  steel  pipe
        .was used  to  facilitate installation  in  very tight
        quarters   where   future   maintenance   would   be
        difficult.

    0   Extend and reroute various sludge piping systems to
        the new  pump station.   Stainless  steel  pipe  was
        also used here.

    0   Repair all  damaged  or modified  basin and  tunnel
        walls to  be fully  watertight.
                          1065

-------
    0  Upgrade electrical  system  to handle  the increased
       motor load and install such conduit runs, starters,
       controls,  etc. as  were required  for  the new systems.

    0  Remove and  extend  existing  flood  plain retaining
       wall, drainage system, paving,  fencing, and rip-rap
       to  provide  space  to  install  biofilter and  pump
       s tation.

    0  Place  5,000  cubic yards of  select structural fill
       on  which  the  biotower   and  pump  station  were
       constructed.

CONSTRUCTION OF THE  EXPANSION

    Since  construction required  difficult tie-ins  and  the
POTW had to  continue  in  operation,  contractor selection
was  critical.   During  the design period,  approximately 75
contractors  were  interviewed,.   From these, 25  contractors
prequalified  and  were   invited  to   bid.   Many  of   the
contractors  were concerned  about  the  risks of working  for
a  private company  (Frito-Lay)  to construct facilities on
public  (Authority)  property.  Two  actions were  taken to
address   these   risks.    First,   the  specifications  _were
written   in  the   Construction  Specification  Institute
format.   They explicitly set-forth  the  General  Conditions
which  related to this project,  especially as  to  how  the
contractor  was  to  interface with Authority personnel  and
Frito-Lay.   In  addition,  the specifications contained  the
contract to be executed  between  the  successful contractor
and  Frito-Lay.   These details allowed  many questions  to be
answered about  the contract before bids were received.

     Secondly,   a    comprehensive   pre-bid   meeting   was
conducted on-site.    The  plans,  specifications,  and  site
were thoroughly reviewed.   All  present  reached agreement
on'the best way to handle specification addenda.   Finally,
it was announced that  the contract  would be  awarded  to  the
qualifying low bidder at  the bid opening  if  all  paperwork
was  in order and the bids  contained no  exceptions.   There
                          1066

-------
would  be  no  lengthy  delays,   "backroom  negotiations"  or
pressure   to    lower   bids.    We   hoped   to   eliminate
contingencies, padding of the bids,  and project delays.

    These  actions  resulted  in  the  receipt  of  12  lump-sum
bids.   Four  of  them  were under  the  engineer's  estimate.
One contractor  was disqualified for  failure  to  provide  a
bid bond.  Within  30 minutes -after'the last bid was  opened
and qualified,  the contract was awarded to the  low bidder,
R.H. White Construction Company of Auburn, Massachusetts.

    Frito-Lay and  Killingly were committed to making  these
facilities  work   as   designed  and   on .schedule.    This.
required the  pre-selection and  pre-purchase,  and expedited
delivery of all the  process  equipment. Frito-Lay directly
purchased   the  .biotower .  media,    rotary    distributor,
submersible pumps  and  controls, all valves over 12 inches,
and  the  flow  meter  and  instrumentation.    The  detailed
design  and   specifications  were   completed   after   these
purchases  were made so that more exact details  were  worked
into  the  plans.   There  would  be  no  "or  equals"   or
substitutions  that might  cost more  to  install,  lead  to
contractor  bid  contingencies,  or   not  meet  the  process
requirements.    As a  result  the  contractor  knew  before
submitting  a  bid  exactly  what   equipment  had  to   be
installed  and when it  would  arrive on-site.   Finally,  all
construction   was  supervised  under   the   direction   of
Frito-Lay,  utilizing   the  field  engineer on-site  at  the
production plant  (4 miles  away)  and  a  representative  of
the consulting engineer.

    These  actions  resulted  in  a high  quality  project  that
was completed on  time  and within budget.  Killingly  Sewer
Authority  personnel  participated   in  every  phase of  the
process design, equipment specification and selection,  and
in  construction coordination.   Their  involvement from  an
operating  standpoint  was  vital.    Although   designed  to
industrial    standards,   the   facilities    augment    the
architecture   of  the   POTW    and   they   are   completely
acceptable to the Authority.
                         1067

-------
 PROJECT FINANCING

     The  final  unusual  feature   of  this  project  is  the
 method  of  financing   the  improvements.   Due  to  funding
 priorities and  the  industrial nature of the POTW capacity
 expansion, federal  funds were not  available.   A  decision
 was  made  to  obtain pollution  control  industrial  revenue
 bonds   (iRB's)   through   the   Connecticut    Development
 Authority.  In total,   $6 million  in bonds were  obtained  to
 pay for various pollution expenditures associated with  the
 new  plant  project.   The $2 million  allocated  to the POTW
 expansion   could  only  be  approved  if  Frito-Lay,  Inc.
 continued  to own the improvements for the twenty-five year
 life of the bonds.   After considerable  negotiations and
 legal  opinions,   a  contract   was executed  that  allowed
 Frito-Lay  to own the facilities and  depreciate  them.  The
 Killingly   Sewer  Authority   is   totally  responsible  for
 Deration  maintenance   and  repair.   By  utilizing  IRB's,
 Frito-Lay  reduced the  annual  interest  rate to  6.3%  from
 the 10-11% rate prevailing at the time of  the  closing  on
 the  bonds.    Abailability  of  IRB  financing  encouraged
 Frito-Lay   to   proceed   forward  with  the  POTW  expansion
 program in Killingly.

 SYSTEM  PERFORMANCE

     The trickling filter was  placed  in operation  during
 April,  1981.  The  biotower  acclimated  quickly, even though
 it  ^was  started  in  the roughing filter  mode with  no  seed
 addition.   In  mid-August, the  decision  to  convert  to  the
 ABF1  mode  was  made   in  order   to  obtain  warm  weather
 operating  data  before  the onset of  winter.   A  license  to
 operate  the Activated  Bio-Filter  (ABF) process  was  issued
 by  Neptune - Microfloc,  Inc.  when the  redwood  media was
 puchased.  Table 1 summarizes system performance  to date.

    The  roughing  filter  performed as expected.    However,
 the  biotower was  designed  to operate  in  the  ABF mode.
Starting in August,  the  removal   efficiencies   increased
dramatically from  65 percent  to a high of  75 percent  in
January, 1982.   Also in January,  the  removal rate reached
52.8  pounds  BOD per 1000 cubic feet.  Average  wastewater
                          1068

-------
  temperature
  January.
declined  from  21.0°C in  August to  11.5°c
                                            in
            Table  1. Summary of System Performance

Month (Ib
June , 19 81
July
August
September
October
November
December
January, 1982 .
Loading
Rate
BOD/1000 CF)
47.6
48.7
46.8
50.4
72.1
42.5
59.1
70.3
Remova 1
Rate
(Ib BOD/1000 CF)
24.9
22.8
30.9
33.7
47.1
27.1
41.3
52.8
Remova 1
Efficiency
(Percent)
52.4
46.8
65.9
66.9
65.4
63.8
69.8
75.2
     During the  period  August  through  November,  biotower
 internal  recycle  was  kept  to  a  minimum and  the  return
 activated sludge  rate applied to  the  tower was  100% of
 plant influent flow.

     Shortly  after start-up, there was a marked improvement
 in  the effluent suspended  solids discharged  by  the POTW.
 In  addition,   solids  thickening operations improved.  Most
.importantly,  sludge dewatering costs  decreased from a high
 of  $57.33 per ton to  a low of  $19.30  per  ton.   Table 2
 summarizes  vacuum filtration chemical  conditioning costs
 during  the study period.

.	Table 2. Vacuum Filtration Chemical Costs
            PERIOD

January through April, 1981

May through August, 1981

September through January, 1982
                  DRY TONS
                  DEWATERED

                     329

                     385

                     471
AVERAGE
COST/TON

•* 43.15

  27.06

  28.97
                           10F9

-------
     During  this  time, there  was  a 15 percent  increase  in
 the  quantity of  dry  solids  dewatered  but a  33  percent
 decrease  in the chemical  conditioning  costs  per  ton of  dry
 solids.   These  cost  savings  amount  to  $15,500  annually.
 Less  time is required to process  these  solids.   Labor  and
 power savings are  also substantial.

 Conclusion

     Based on  operation  to date, the biotower is  achieving
 the   design  removal  efficiency.    Overall,    the  POTW
 operation  has improved.   Average  effluent TSS and  BOD
 values  are  lower  now   than  before  Frito-Lay  started
 production.   There have been  few  permit  violations, these
 being  minor suspended solids excursions  above  the 30 mg/1
 level.   Settling  characteristics  of the  secondary  solids
 have  improved.  m fact,  it  costs  substantially  less  now
 to  dewater sludge  than two years ago in spite of inflation
 and   even   though   sludge   quantities   have   increased
 substantially.

    The   Authority  is  sufficiently   pleased   with   the
biotower   facility   that   Frito-Lay,  Inc.   was   able   to
negotiate  an  expansion  of  production.    in  fact    this
expansion   is   currently   underway  and  will   make  the
Killmgly plant Frito-Lay's largest.
                          1070

-------
      THE EVALUATION OF A BIOLOGICAL TOWER FOR TREATING
              AQUACULTURE WASTEWATER FOR REUSE
     Gary L. Rogers.  Department of Civil Engineering
     Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah

     Stanley L. Klemetson.  Department of Civil Engineering
     'BrTghattTYoung University, Provo, Utah
INTRODUCTION
     During the 1950's, Dr. Shao-wen Ling was sent to
Southeast Asia by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
as a fisheries specialist.  He became interested in a large
Malaysian prawn which he first observed in the marketplace.
Since that time there have been many species of freshwater
prawns identified that are distributed over the tropical and
semi-tropical waters of the world.  Most are limited to
waters that maintain annual temperatures of 22 to 30 C.  The
most popular species for culture is Macrobrachium rosenbergii
(1).
     Adult prawns are capable of living in freshwater and may
be either intensively cultured in tanks or raceways at high
stocking density or extensively cultured in earthen ponds at
a lower density.  Marketable size prawns may be harvested in
five to six months under optimal conditions.  Glude (2)
presented an overview of freshwater prawn culture that
describes rearing requirements and technques.  Figure 1
illustrates the adult prawn showing characteristic parts.
                            1071

-------
     The development of prawn larvae to metamorphasis
requires temperatures of between. 24 and 32 C with preferred
temperatures around 28 C.  These temperatures also apply for
commercial growth of adults in ponds.
     Adults and broodstock may be maintained easily in either
freshwater or brackish water.  The larvae require brackish
water of between 8 and 17 ppt salinity.  Juveniles require
salinities of about 5 to 8 ppt decreasing to freshwater as
they grow to adults.
     The toxicity of ammonia to aquatic life has been fairly
well documented.  The EPA criterion of unionized ammonia for
fish and aquatic life is less than 0.02 mg/1 (3).  The 144
hour LC 50 for Macrobrachiuni rosenbergii  was determined by
Armstrong (4), to be 0.80 mg/1 ammonia at a pH of 7.6.
Additional work is necessary to verify and establish these
toxic limits of unionized ammonia for the Malaysian prawn.
     Nitrite has also been shown to be toxic to freshwater
prawns (5).  LC 50 values ranged from 500 mg/1 for the first
12-hour exposure to 5 mg/1 during a 168-hour exposure.  The
maximum level of nitrite tested with no deaths, ranged from
9.7 mg/1 for 24 hours to 1.8 mg/1 at 168 hours.
     There is a paucity of data concerning the concentration
and nature of wastes produced in intensively cultured
systems. Little has been presented about water quality of
effluents from culture systems.  The problem is coraplexed by
the fact that organics and nitrogen in the water may be due
to metabolic products of: prawns and other secondary feeders
in the culture ponds as well as unused feed added daily to
the water.  A summary of the reported water quality values
and the proposed levels for design of new production
facilities is shown in Table 1.
     Several investigators have described water recirculating
systems using biofilters for intensive cultivation of salmon
smolts (6,7,8), catfish (9), trout (10,11,12,13),  shrimp
(14,15,16), tilapia (17,18), polyculture (19), carp (20),
and the combination of fish culture with hydroponics in a
single recirculation system (21).  Few of the authors,
however, discuss the basis for their choice of biofilter
design parameters.  There is little indication that the
designs conform either to economic or to resource minima for
their declared purposes.  Spotte recommends that surface area
of the filter be made at least equal to the surface area of
the culture.'  This rule of thumb may favor successful
recirculation water quality but says little about keeping the
investment minimal (22).
                           1072

-------
     Removal of the toxic hazard from nitrogenous waste is
the most important task of the biofliter.  The predominant
form of waste nitrogen from aquatic animals is ammonia,
excreted mostly from the gills or in the urine, or produced
by mineralization of organic nitrogenous substances by
bacteria.  Invertebrates also excrete nitrogen in the form of
ammonia.  Bacteria of the Nitrosomonas group oxidize ammonia
to nitrate;
    NH  + OH 4- 1.5 0
      2 H  + NO + H 0
               2   2
the reaction is rate limiting in the overall process of
nitrogen control.  For this reason, nitrites seldom
accumulate in biofiltered recirculation water.  Nitrite is
readily oxidized to nitrate by Nitrobacter ssp.;
     NO  + 1/2 0
       2        2
=  NO
     3
and the nitrate is then available either for assimilation by
green plants or bacteria, or for reduction to nitrous oxide
and free nitrogen, usually by anaerobic denitrifying
bacteria.
     The microbial population activity in the filter is
essentially ubiquitous in distribution, spontaneously
coloniing new filters, although inoculation can be expedited
by addition of gravel from preexisting filters (8).  The
bacterial species which predominate at various depths of the
filter are presumably self-selecting, in response to
environmental factors, such as the nutrient content,
hydraulic flow, and aeration of the filter bed, although
their respective numbers are known to fluctuate until an
equilibrium is established (Kawai, et al., 1964).
     Few approaches to analysis of design standards for
biofilters in aquacultural applications are given in the
literature.  Hirayama reported on filter carrying capacity
for a 300 liter marine aquarium containing one or two sea
breams, Chrysophrys major (23).  Spotte cautions that
Himayama's results need verification before accepting their
validity in freshwater, but there is reason to exercise a
certain amount of skepticism in generalizing them even for
marine aquaria (22).  One should keep in mind the small
numbers of fish on which they are based.
                            1073

-------
     Harris considered use of biological filters in hatchery
water reuse systems.  Submerged filters (Flexring and Flocor)
were tested and found satisfactory in control of fish wastes.
The basis for design of the biofilters used was Speece's
method for finding substrate volume based on ammonia
production rate divided by the nitrification rate (10).
     A. major limiting factor in intensification of
aquaculture is water quality.  Biofilters need to be included
in aquaculture systems to insure pollution removal and good
quality water for use and reuse.  Work is being done on
optimizing treatment systems for aquatic animals and
developing accurate design specifications for treatment.
More research is needed in this area.
     Management of the filter is an important consideration
in obtaining nitrification and BOD removal from either fresh
or saline aquaculture wastewater.  Removal rates may be
enhanced by increased temperature, recirculating effluent
back over the filter media, dosing the filter, ventilating
the filter, adding additional media and surface area, and
maintaining environmental requirements by careful monitoring.
     Wheaton (24) describes in depth design criteria for
submerged filters with varied filter media.  The equations
presented for design are restricted to cold-water
applications and care is advised in extending to treatment
systems for treating wastewater produced in warmwater fish
culture facilities.
     The types of media that have been applied to aquaculture
include oyster shell, rock and gravel, plastic rings, poly
beads, sand, and styrofoam.  A new possibility is the Tri-
Pack  spherical media available from Jaeger Tri-Packs in
Costa Mesa, Calif (technical bulletin, 1981).
     Trickling filters and upflow submerged filters may be
designed according to a simplified procedure presented by
Soderberg and Quigley (25).  Their data is for perch culture
and probably should not be generalized for culture of all
warmwater species of fish and invertebrates.
     This study is a joint effort between  Dr. Stanley L.
Klemetson currently at Brigham Young University and Dr. Dan
Cohen of the Hebrew University. The U.S. portion of the study
deals mostly with engineering problems while the Israel
portion deals with production of  the animals. It has been
important to coordinate efforts and share information to
improve each study.
                           1074

-------
METHODOLOGY
     The filters used in this study were laboratory-scale
units having a capacity of 1.4 cu. ft. each.  Each filters
was filled with 1 to 1.5 inch slag with a total surface area
of 82.0 sq.ft., and a specific surface area of 60.0
sq.ft./cu.ft.
     Figure 2 presents a schematic of the two filters used in
this study.  The facilities at Brigham Young University were
used to construct the colunms.  Both filters were fabricated
from a section of 10 inch PVC pipe.  The end discs were cut
from plexiglass.
     The two filters were fed a uniform flow from a 4.5 cu.
ft. plexiglass constant head tank with overflow weir  (Figure
3).  Two 4.0 ft  (0.11 m ) storage tanks filled with
synthetic wastewater was used to feed the constant head tank.
     The two storage tanks were used to hold the synthetic
wastewater to be treated by the system.  The synthetic
wastewater was compounded as needed from a  balanced minimal
media which approximates actual wastewater  produced by
prawns.  Table 2 presents the composition of the synthetic
feedstock solution.  Diffused air was introduced to insure
adequate mixing within  the storage tanks.   Tap water  was  used
to fill the tank to Its desired level.
     The studies done at the Hebrew University in Israel
utilized 900-liter aquaria and submerged filters.  The
submerged filters were  filled with 20-30 cm gravel in a 700 1
tank.  The flowrate was controlled at 0.5 cu. m./ hr.
Salinity of  the  rearing tank was maintained at 1.2% sea water
for  growth of  freshwater prawn larvae.
     Water quality sampling was done  prior  to feeding and
drainage of sediments  for the Israel  study. Standard Methods
(26) were used  to determine dissolved oxygen, biochemical
oxygen demand,  pH, alkalinity, salinity, ammonia, nitrate,and
nitrite both  at  the Hebrew University and at Brigham  Young
University.  Water samples were taken at both the influent
and  effluent  of  the  biofliters.
 RESULTS
      The results of work done at Brigham Young University are
 presented in Table 3.  After acclimation of the biofilters,
 data was collected to evaluate their performance.  Profiles
 of the parameters monitored are presented in Figures 4
                           1075

-------
through 7 for the Submerged and Trickling filters.  Figure 4
presents a profile of ammonia levels.  The average value of
ammonia removal for the trickling filter was 78%.  In the
case of the submerged anaerobic filter, there was an average
increase of ammonia by 8% through the filter.
     Figure 5 presents the nitrate profile for the two
filters. The nitrate concentrations decreased  by 97% in  the
submerged filter while there was an increase observed in the
trickling filter.  The length of time required for start-up
of the filters was 3-4 weeks.  At three weeks, the trickling
filter was effectively nitrifying the synthetic wastewater.
The submerged filter was anaerobic and functioning as a
denitrifying filter in about the same length of time.  Other
parameter profiles are presented in Figures 6 and 7.
     Data describing the results of the Israel study are
presented in Table 4 and 5.  The data indicates that the
nitrification efficiency of freshwater prawn wastewater was
59% ammonia removal and 55% nitrite removal.  Figure 8
presents the nitrogen profiles for a tank and biofilter
system in Israel.  The filters were capable of maintaining a
stable environment, though further study is necessary to
determine sizing criteria for filter design.
     The results of these studies are being reviewed as part
of an ongoing study to develop design criteria for
application to treatment of warmwater aquaculture wastewater.
The data obtained in this portion of the study suggests that
nitrifiction efficiency can approach 80% when the synthetic
wastewater is lightly loaded.  The optimum hydraulic loading
has not been determined.  The efficiency of ammonia removal
in brackish water is about 60%.
     An important consideration in maintenance of the
biofilter is aeration.  If aquaculturists are interested only
in nitrification, careful monitoring and addition of
dissolved oxygen is important.  Denitrification is an
anaerobic process that requires little maintenance.
Aquaculturists should consider the coupling of the two
processes, especially where the recontioned water is returned
to the culture vessel.
DISCUSSION
     The design and sizing of biofilters for application to
aquaculture is more of an art than a science.  If facilities
are  to be developed for intensification of fish culture, a
great deal of research needs to be done.  Design criteria are
                          1076

-------
available for facilities that rear cold-water fish and
invertebrates but is limited to water temperatures up to L5
C.  Since operating temperatures are high (27 to 30 C),
organic loadings are small, and flowrates are high, standard
design tables are not adequate.  To complicate matters more,
the actual waste production rates for the live aquaculture
systenus are variable and ill-defined.  Optimization of design
will require the continued evaluation of equipment and
processes under a variety of conditions.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

     The authors wish to express their thanks to the B.t-
National Agricultural Research and Development Fund Grant No.
US-60-80, for providing a research grant, for support of this
project, and to Aquaculture Production Technology (Israel),
Ltd.
REFERENCES
    Hanson, J.A., Goodwin, H.L., Shrimp and Prawn Farming In
    The Western Hemisphere, Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross,
    Inc., Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, p.198 (1977).
    Glude, J.B., The Freshwater Prawn Macrobrachium
    rosenbergii, consulting report, Jan 1978.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency, Quality
    Criteria for Water, USEPA, Washington, D.C.,July (1976).
    Armstrong, D.A., Chippendale, D.v Knight, A.W., and Colt,
    J.E., Interaction of Ionized  and Unionized Ammonia on
    Short-term Survival and Growth of Prawn Larvae,
    Macrobrachium rosenbergii, The Biological Bulletin, Vol
    154, p. ffrn7~YeVT9T8T~
    Kawaratani, R.K., State of the Art: Waste Heat
    Utilization for Agriculture and Aquaculture, Tennessee
    Valley Authority, August  (1978).
    Burrows, R.E., Controlled Environments for Salmon
    Propagation, Prog. Fish Culture, 30(3):123-136, 1964.
    Meade,T.L. The Technology of Closed System Culture of
    Salmonids, Animal Science/NOAA Sea Grant University of
    Rhode Island, Mar. Technol. Rep. 30.
    Risa, S. and H. Skjervold, Water Reuse System for Smolt
    Production, Aquaculture,  6:191-19.5, 1975.
                            1077

-------
9.  Broussard, M.C. and B.A. Sumco,  High Density Culture of
    Channel Catfish in a Recirculating System,  Prog.  Fish
    Cult., 38:138-141,1976.
10. Harris, L.E.,  Nitrifying Requirements of Water Reuse
    Systems for Rainbow Trout,  Colorado Division of Wildlife
    Special Report, No. 41, Feb 1977.
11. Fyock,O.L., Nitrifiction Requirements of Water Reuse
    Systems for Rainbow Trout,  Colorado Division of Wildlife
    Special Report, No.41, Feb  1971.
12. Mayo, R.D.,A Technical and  Economic Review of the Use of
    Reconditioned Water in Aquaculture, Aquaculture,  pp.508-
    520,1976.
13. Speece,R.E., Trout Metabolism Characteristics and the
    Rational Design of Nitrifiction Facilities  for Water
    Reuse in Hatcheries,Trans.  Amer. Fish. Soc.,102(2):323-
    334,1973.
14. McSweeny,D.S., Intensive Culture Systems, Edited by J.A.
    Hansen and H.L. Goodwin, In Shrimp and Prawn Farming in
    the Western Hemisphere, Dowden,  Hutchinson, and Ross,
    Inc. Stroudsburg, Penn. pp.255-272,1977.
15. Mock,C.R., Ross, L.R., and  Salser,B.R.,Design and
    Evaluation of Waste Removal Systems for Shrimp Culture in
    Closed Raceways,World Mariculture Society 6th Ann.
    Workshop, Jan 1975.
16. Siddal,J.,Studies of Closed Marine Culture Systems, Prog.
    Fish. Cult.,36(1):8-15,1974.
17. Otte,G. and Rosenthal,H., Management of a Closed Brackish
    Water System for High Density Fish Culture  by Biological
    and Chemical Water Treatment,Aquaculture,18:169-181,1979.
18. Allison,R., Rakocy, J.E.,and Moss,D.D.,A Comparison of
    Two Closed Systems for the Culture of Tilapia,Presented
    at the International Symposium for Advance in Food
    Producing Systems for Arid and Semi-arid Lands, Kuwait
    City, Kuwait,April 1980.
19. VanGorder,S., Small Scale Fish Culture Systems, Rodale
    Press Research Report 80-12, May 1980.
20. Meske,C.H., Fish Culture in a Recirculating System with
    Water Treatment by Activated Sludge, Aquaculture,pp.527-
    532,1976.
21. Lewis, W.H.,Yopp,J.H., Schramm,  and Brandenberg,A.M., Use
    of Hydroponics to Maintain Quality of Rec.irculated Water
    in a Fish Culture System, Trans. Am. Fish.  Soc., 107:92-
    99,1978.
22. Spotte,S.H., Fish and Invertebrate Culture, Water
    Management in Closed Systems,Wiley, London, 145 pg, 1970.
                           1078

-------
23. Hirayama,K., Studies on Water Control by Filtration
    Through Sand Bed in a Marine Aquarium with Closed
    Circulating System,IV. Rate of Pollution of Water  by Fish
    and the Possible Number and Weight of Fish Kept  in an
    Aquarium,Bui. Japan Soc.Sci. Fish., 32:27-30,1966.
24. Wheaton, F.W., Agricultural Engineering,  Wiley
    Interscience, New York, 1977.
25. Soderburg,  R.W. and Quigley, J.T., The Technology  of
    Perch Aquaculture, University of Wisconsin Sea Grant
    Program, WIS-SG-77-416, 1977.
26. APHA,AWWA,WPCF,Standard Methods for the Examination of
    Water and Wastewater, 14th edition, Washington,  D.C.,
    1976.
                           1079

-------
Figure 1.   Freshwater Prawns (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) and
      Artificial Habitats in Fish Culture Tank.
                           1080

-------
                                 8 in. PVC
    1-T/2 in.
      slag
                                sampling  ports
Figure 2.  Schematic Diagram of Biological Tower and

              Submerged Filter (BYU-Study).
                         1081

-------
Figure 3.  Constant Head Tank Used to Dose Biological
        Tower and Submerged Filter (BYU Study).
                        1082

-------
    10

     10
     5 I
                                     A
                             Vlnf 1 uent
                              Effluent
                     Day
                                     B
                        Effluent
                               Inf1uent
                     Day
Figure 4.  Ammonia Removals in Biological Tower (A)  and
               Submerged Biofilter (B).
                        1083

-------
  10
        Effluent
 en
§
   10
                    Day
                     Day
                                     'B
 Figure  5.  Nitrate Removals in Biological Tower  (A) and
                Submerged Biofilter (B) .
                        1084

-------
    
-------
   4-1

   •rl
             Submerged  Fi1ter
   •5200

-------
(1/6UJ)   ir-.-T  £QN
        --— \\'
                   •—
                                                        cd
                                                        M
                                                        CD
                                                        cu
                                                        g
                                                        60
                                                        •u
                                                        Ctf
                                                        rH

                                                        O

                                                        •H
                                                        a
                                                        0)
                                                        rH
                                                        •H
P-i

g
00
O
4-1
•H
                                                        OO

                                                        CU


                                                        60
               1087

-------






af
•o
§
C-,
o
jl
3
CJ
3
cr
*3
&.
o


^»
1
o-

.3
a
5-
U*
O
w
o

•a
o
t*
o
*
1









•3
0
•o
o
CO
1
CO

a
a
a
O
o
o
"3
to

.c


Z



•o
£2
c
P"-t
»rf«


O
j3
t.
u
•8



C-,
w
CO
p






t=.
o
•*-*
u
E
Cj
L*
RJ
a



co • t_ S
r_j Q} ' C"S CD CD ^Q

V V AVVVVV/vvVV V V V V V'VVV'V


o
CQ -<3< ^ CO | CD CO
T-HOOJ C3 C3CDCOOrH 'IOO CD UO^
C3 O O O O^OOO CD^ CQ CQ^


C) ^
, •
CO ^^ 5>P
in CQ | 01 o^
CQrHCD 10 CD "^g^ ' « CD S O ^
O O O C3 C3CDCOC3 CO lOi-H COCD






CD o
C-3 CO C3 C*3 C^ vO
O pq CD CD CD O "^ ^*l" ^ CD T— 4 CD CD ^
CD 1/3 CM CD m »— I CDCOCD CJ T— 1 ^ CO CD



CD IO
CQ CO C^3 pP
C*3 | IT3 T-* CO in | CD ^
CD *^J* ^3 CD CD CD i — 1 IO CD ^^
CDCD CD CD CDCD CDCOCD i-HCO



CQ ^
*-4 O5 C-3
C^ 1 I CD 0
^ °J '-J -^r m S S CD "^ S o in
O *— t CD i-H t— t-H i— 1 t-H «D O CJC^




"•8
• 1 3 S 1
c -2 ° w
0 w ^ ^T? TJ Ti'~s
*O &9 x-^-u-— CJ^-a*-3
*X x *3 c:ojc^^cf~1
c — ^ p ±i £GJ c O^S'010 ^^^
^C *^ U O CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ C-5 i^ D^ , 1 »^i «n rC p^ ^ pir y^ y^ [/3 ^M f-i £— i f-i £— i f-i ^




































'§
?g
c >>
4-)
w U3
0.0-
a)
K «
03

"ho
e-"|
c °> ,2
•^ rH Q
rn -C
IfS
o £ j=
i ^ ^
g^^
£< »"
o CM t
CJ W 0
J2
S CO O
•< D es
CS -O CJ "






























Cn
t-
"3
CJ

o
o
CJ
CO
w
E
o
£_.

"3
CJ
o
•c
o
o
o
"3
o
o
5"















CO
t"-



c
Cw
;t
o
CJ

c
G
c
1-1
0
^
(t
cl
o
c
bi
ei
Q
"3
_CJ
'5
o
"o
S
o

•J^
5
E
a
o
CJ
CJ
p
aT
1
bp
£
1) <.
































CT)
in
rM
_
"o
o
XI
o
CJ
6
CO
>
"3
Gf
^
2J
^j
oT
•a
o
3
O
4~>
ronmen
>
c
i)

1088

-------
Table 2.  Synthetic Wastewater Solution (BYU study),
DEXTROSE
YEAST EXTRACT
UREA
NA2HPOi}
NAHC03
                                  100 M6/L
                                   10 MG/L
                                    5 MG/L
                                   40 MG/L
                                  125 MG/L
                                    2 MG/L
                                 AS REQUIRED
                   1089

-------













/**\
3
4J
CO
1
*s^

4J
ft)
o

^
4J

3
o-
.^
0)
4J

££


!E



a)

£5
I
CO
0
S3



CO

j-—
1
CM
O
53





rt
CO
§












,
CO
CO
CM
|

VO
VO
r-(
CM
*
vO
i
o
t— i
CM

OO
in
•
^



CTv
,— 1
,
m
0





j>^
in
•
CO

o




a\
CO


4-1
a
a)
3
i-l

H




s~\
VO

•
[^
o
CM
\^r
x-s.
oo
oo
,
CO
v-x



oo
OO

v-'


y™\
00
CXJ

1—1
V_^




y~ X

oo
»
o
\**s





s~^
r-t
VO
v«^











O
•
o
I— 1
CM
I
CM
VO
t— 1
CO
•
VO
1

CO
I— 1
•
00
-sf
•
l-s.
CO
in

i— )
i — i
1

•
.— i



00

,
CM
1
m
•
o




m
I
CM
m
•
o

60
•rl OJ
iH 4J

0 -rl
•rl P4
!-l
H




s~*
in
r--
•
oo
P*"»
T— t
V.^
^"N
O
CO
•
in
^s


/-^
i-H
CO
r~
>s-/



PS,
 — /





X— s
VD
r-H
' — ^


4J
a)

,_ ]
14-1
m
w




oo
•
VO
CO
CM
1
vO
OO
i— 1
«sT
•
.—1
1
CM
0
i— 1

00
00
r~
vO
CT»
•
o
i
i— i
0
0


oo
CM

0
1
1 — 1
o
o
•




o
.-H
1
oo
m

13
a) ^
ta 
-------
 cO
 4J
 ni
 P

 >>
 4-1
 •H
 rH
 nj

 o*

 f-l
 Q)
 4J
 ni
 13
 id
 ^
 PM
 "4-1
 O
 to

 §

 £
 *O'

•s
 CD
 0)
 00
 -*

  OJ
 •s




^f
1
CO
o






^*«
1
CM
CD







•^r
I
CO
' .





—f"
CD-






CD

o


2:
i — i
s:
1
^
s
Lf>
O —
• co
CD LO

CD "^
• — -
0
( — 1
LO

CD LO
• i — i
O r~^
1 O
O •
r^ o
- LO 	 -
•
O


OQ
CO - — ^
o cn
. .— i
O CM
i
f~- o
°'~



CM- — •
• CM
co co
1 O

• CO

LO ,
CM-— ~
• LO
cn =»-
• • 	 '
cn

CM
0
CD

CD cn
1 0
CO CD
CD -
• O
0- —

LO
0
CD- —
. CO
o cn
1 CD
CO •
CM O
CD


O
LO. — *

CO 1^-.
1 CM
LO •
CO CO
^

LO - — -
CM CO
• LO
CO >— 1

LO r~-
CO
LO
.—1
CO
CM
CM
CO


LO *-"^
O LO
• 0
0 •=*•
1 ~— •*
o
»— f
LO
0
o
•
0 —
1 CM
LO O
r--
0 0
, • 	 '
CD
LO
CO
0
• ,-— *.
CD cn
i cn
LO CD
CO
CM O
d^


o
CO- — -
• CO
CO LO
1 *~^
CO •
cn co
^

-• — *
O CO
. CO
cn «— i

co r-I
LO
cn •-
CM
o
CO
LO
CO
LO-
O"ID
. CO
0 OO
1
CO -cf
« - — -
cn
LO
o
0
• — " "^
o r^
I CM
LO O
OO .
O CD
• ' — ••
o
LO
CM
O
• .. — -.
CD t^-
1 CO
CD CD
cn •
,-H O
O
O
CO
co
• -— *w
CO CO
1 CD
LO t— i
r^ •
o oo
od"


LO
• -— *-,
co cn
i •
O CO
LO
CO
CM
cn
CM
CO
CO
uo-
oco
• co
o »—<
i
LO *3"
• 	 •
CD
LO
O
0
• f^^^i
O CM
1 CO
0 0
LO •
i— i O
• *- — -
CD
LO
CO
O
• - — *
CD ^J~
i cn
0 0
CO
CM O
°
O

CO
• ^— •.
CO CD
1 CO
LO <— 1
r**^ •
cn co
^
LO
CM - — ^
• CD
OO CO
1 <-<
CM •
LO r~~
LO

CM
cn
CM
I-H
co

- — !•
LO r~-
CD ^t*
• •
CD -<^-
1 •*• — -*
0
,— 1
LO
O
o
9 **~~*
O LO
1 CM
O O
cn •
O O
• •- — -
O
CD '."
CM ,
O
• * — ^
CD cn
i co
0 0
LO •
1-1 O
0

LO
CM
CO
• . — *
co r^-
i i~" ^
LO, •
•d- co
co*^"

o
t— * -~x
• oo
00 CO
i •
o co
LO
0
CM
oo"
CM
CM
CO
                                     1091

-------
4J
rt
H
m
 (0
 
                        OJ
                         Lf)

                         OD

                          +1

                         CO
                         CM
                                                    uo
                                                          oo
                                                                CT>
                                                                      CM
                                                                      ID
                                                                             OO
                                                                              +1
                                        (£3
                                        OO
CM
LO
CO
LO
                                                                oo
                                ID

                                00
co

co'
LT)
                                        oo
                                                                      CM
                                                                              IX
                                       1092

-------
              BIOFILTRATION OF TANNERY WASTEWATER
              Ahmed A„  Hamz a,
              Fahmy M.  El-Sharkawi,
              Mohamed A0  Younis,
              Department  of Environmental Health,
              High Institute of Public Health,
              Alexandria  University, Egypt
INTRODUCTION
     Industrial pollution on an unprecedented scale: has emerged
as one of the most pressing problems throughout the world.
While governments have been grappling with a pernicious combi-
nation of economic, social and political problems, they have
not paid equal attention to issues related to environmental
protection,,  Improving the quality of the environment is no ...
longer a luxury measure;  it is one which, in the long run,
will generate immeasurable benefits in terms of protecting
public health and natural resources, and indirectly contribut-
ing to economic growtho
     Alexandria is the principal port of Egypt, the country's
largest industrial center and its prime resort„  The ever-
increasing discharge of heavily polluted industrial effluents
from tanneries of the Mex Industrial Complex (MIC)into the Me-
diterranean has had an adverse effect on public health, fish
production, navigation and the environmental quality of the
area0  The combined effluent of MIC averages 2 million cubic
meters annually,with an estimated population equivalent of   '.
400,0000
                              1093

-------
     Biofiltration has been widely recognized as a reliable
treatment process, which suits the needs of small to medium-
size industries, due to its versatility, ability to take shock
loads and relative ease of operation.  Decreased popularity of
biofiltration in comparison to other treatment processes has
been attributed to inability of existing installations to meet
emission limitations and the ineffectiveness of biofilters for
treatment of concentrated industrial effluents,,
     Renewed interest in biofiltration in Egypt is due to rela-
tively low power requirements,'system flexibility, and the
need for considerably less technical know-how for effective
operation compared to other treatment technologies,,
     High-rate biofiltration was shown by Smith and Kates(*)
to be cost-effective and capable of reducing organic loadingp
Several plastic media were tested in the high-rate biofilter
units and each medium supported an adequate level of microbial
organismso
     Problems with odor were encountered because of the sludge
production of the high organic strength wastewaters0
     Hosono and Kubota(2)  reported that the BOD removal rate
per unit of power consumption was shown to decrease with in-
creasing BOD loadingso  High-rate filters gave higher power
economy values at higher BOD loadings, whereas standard-rate
trickling filters were limited to low BOD loadings„
     Bailey et al'3^ have shown that high rate biofiltration
can relieve overloaded conventional filters by removing about
40% of BOD from leather processing wastewater,,  Plastic media
were used in the roughing filters which were dosed with tannery
effluents containing vegetable tanneries at rates of 3.3 to
6o9 Ib BOD/yd3/d0
     Pierce'^) reported that removal of BOD at two-stage filter
plants is significantly higher than at single-stage plants„
Chemical treatment with metal salts and polymers upgraded
single-stage filter effluents from an average of 36 mg/1 BOD
to 21 mg/lo  Similarly, effluent suspended solids were reduced
from 32 mg/1 to 19 mg/1.  The cost of chemicals is not prohi-
bitively expensive„
     Previous research has indicated the need to assess high-
rate biofiltration at various loadings and flow patterns for
treatment of specific industrial wastes, in order to accurately
evaluate system performance.   It is particularly important to
compare the performance of biofilters with other competing bio-
logical processes for treatment of tannery wastes and evaluation
of cost-effective modifications to improve effluent quality,,
Recognition of these needs prompted the undertaking of this
study„
                              1094

-------
BACKGROUND
     The MIC tanneries are located east and west of the muni-
cipal slaughterhouse, as shown in Figure 1.  At present, the
slaughterhouse and tannery wastes (including organic particles
and toxic chemicals) are collected in public sewers and dis-
charged directly into the western harbour through three sepa-
rate outfalls, without pre-treatmento  Sewer clogging is fre-
quently experienced due to large residues discharged with tan-
nery effluentSo                              V
     The General Organization for Industrialization (GOFI) is
placing MIC tanneries on the top priority list of the most pol-
luting industries which require Government technical and finan-
cial support for installation of waste treatment facilities.
The available options being studied are: (a) primary treatment
of combined effluent before discharge into public sewers for
further treatment with domestic wastes or (b) biological treat-
ment to meet Egyptian effluent limitations for direct disposal
into water bodies„
     According to prevalent practices in MIC tanneries, about
28-36 cubic meters of wastewater are generated per ton of hide
processed^) 0
     Studies performed on the six major tanneries during 1980-
1981 indicated that clean water pools of the beam house contri-
bute 24o8% of the total effluent and only 0^.28% of the BOD load,
while vegetable tannery generates 104% of the liquid wastes
and 43o3% of the BOD load (Table I)0    This suggests that ju-
dicious segregation of relatively clean process waters may ap-
preciably reduce the size and costs of treatment facilities0
The pollutional loads of tannery processes shown in Table II
indicate that both beam house and tan-yard generate higher
loadings than those originated from retin, color and fat liquor
processeso
     Chrometan mixed wastes comply with EPA guidelines^ ' while
BOD, COD and Oil and Grease  (0 & G) loadings of the vegetable
tan mixed wastes were higher than those suggested in the guide-
lines o  A summary of the physico-chemical characteristics and
trace metal constituents of various process effluents are shown
in Tables III and IV respectively,,
MATERIALS AND METHODS
     The experimental system consists, of two biofilters, recy-
cling pumps and clarifiers, as shown in Figure 20  Each filter
                              1095

-------
«  os coin
              0} OJ  
-------
     Table 1.   Distribution of  Volume and BOD load foi the Processing
               Operations of The MIC Tanneries.
Process Waste Volume % of Total BOD % of Total BOD
Volume Load '
A. Beam-House Wastes
Soaking & Washing
Lime & Unhairing
Delime 4 Baiting
Clean Wash Water Pools
B. Tan - Yard Wastes
Pickling '
Chrome Tanning
Pre - Tanning
Vegetable Tanning
C. Retan - Color & Fatliquor
Neutralization
Bleaching
Color S, Fatliquor
Total
Table II. Pollutional Loads of
Pollutional
Ei fluent Stream . BOD TOC
A. Beam-House Wastes
Soaking {. Washing 11.8 5.4
Lime & Unhairing 26.6 15.5
Delime & Baiting 16.5 8.2
Clean Wash Water Pools 0.4
B. Tan - Yard Wastes
Pickling 4.5 2.3
Chrome Tanning 7.3 3.7
Pre - Tanning 21.2 10.6
Vegetable Tanning 92.8
C. Retan - Color & Fatliquor
Neutralization 3.0 2.0
Bleaching 18.7 15.1
Color & Fatliquor 11.8 7.3
Chrome-Tan Mixed Waste 92.6
Vegetable-Tan Mixed Waste 150.8
EPA ( Ref.6) 95
8-3 5.4
24-3 12.4 .
20.0 7.7 .
24.8 o.2
77.2 25.7
5-5 2.1
5.5 3.4
2.0 9.9
1-4 43.3
14.4 58.7
2.8 1.4
218 8.7
2.8 5.5
8-4 15.6
100 . 100
the MIC Tanning Processes.
Load Kg/ K Kg * of hides
TKN SR 0 & G T Cr
0.74 5.9 2.5
1.64 51.8 2.2
5.3. 27.7 0.4
1.6
0.7 9.1 0.1
0.75 9.5 0.6
0.6 116' 0.4
0.9 8.5 0.05
0.5 51.2 0.3
1.2 6.8 60.5
:109.2 8.6 3.5
72.1 9.4 0.0
140 19 4.3
Mean of 12 observations.
                                                  * K/KKg •= Kg/1000 Kg.
                                   1097

-------
x:
a
 a
5
•5
o
1 -**

r> s
rH
)

r oo
c- B
rH
CO *^.
CMCO
X S
1 rH

O CO
W E


r-4

H CO
O 5



F-t
5 "M
-< E

S ^


5= B
^
o -•*
O 00
-. E



ca **^
o oo
0 E


rH
Q ^
O 60
pa B




OS ^
iJ *^.
Q) rH
CO E


r-H

Si 60



,Q

3 H
H SS


X O3
O. ^^






to
(0
0)
O
o
V-)
PU
CM m ON m
ON r- o co
vO CO vD rH

rH vo m ON
rH O CM rH
^
CO • VO CO
- CM O OO
r^> rH CO *O
co m o vo
o CM co m
ON ON -0- CM
rH rH CO rH

0 rH 0 CO
vO OO vD O
•fc± 



O rH
yz o PS
S li
8 3g
CO
0 CO
rH VD

CO
^

ON m
CO CO

ON in

vo m
CM CM

O CO
O r-
03 vD
0 rH
rH



VO
vo r-*


CO rH



vo m
VO rH
CM -a-
CM rH


i-H CO
 35
PH OH
CO -J i— 1 rH
mm o CM
rH rH

TO CM CO CO
O O CO rH
CO
0 .H

O O
r- r-
vO CO
CM rH
CO rH

co in co co
co co co -a-
vo r- CM co
-a- co oo
rH




r- ON m oo


O CO ON O
ON ON r*- CM
rH

O O CM
m vo O O
ON CO ON rH
CM vO OO CO
CM CO
t~~ "a1 r-» m
•a- vO VO rH
r^. co CM i —
CM -3- CM O
CM CM CM CO
rH


r~~ CM r-- in
vO ON vO CO

in *a~ »n rH
CO CM




P-. rH r- OO
mm CM vo
CM . CM i-H


O vD CM CO
ON vO r-» rH
in m CM *a-
CO CM



m ON
CM -a-
CM

1 1
rH ON CM vO
-a* m m
ix; Q ix Q



2i [X]
H ,-J
% §g
H UJ S
(X, > H

rH •








r-. m
o m
rH CM
CM CM

r* oo
vo o
m CM
CO





oo m


r* m
r- co
rH

r- in
vo ro
m CM


ON in
r^ -a-
vO vO
rH



r- r-
CM m
OO CM






CO rH
rH CM
rH


m m
vo oo
co m




O CO
O rH
tH

1
CO vO
vo r^
IX 0
en



tH
§§
O r-<
w
K \
m vo
CO OO
VD m
rH rH

rH CO
O




CO vD
CO CO
ON VO
CM

m CM

VD r-
CO rH





vo r^


CM vO
CO ON
rH

rH CO
rH ON
O vO
CM i-H

CO CM


m - f-v,













*
o
-H
4-1

•H

a)
-o
•o
J-l
rt
td
en
0













CO
e
0
iH
LJ
ca


a)
CO
ji
o
3
O
UH
MH
o

c

S
R
IX











-------
 TablelV :Trace Metal Analyses of Wastewator from Processing Operations at MIC
        Tanneries.
Process
Liming &
Unhair


Pickling



Chrome-.
Tanning


Final
•Waste



R

X
SD'
R

X
SD
R

X
SD
R

X
SD
Total
Chromium
mg/1








560-
1400
919
372
50-
141
97
37.4
TRACE METALS (ug/1)
Pb
80-
116
99
18




98-
175
128
41.4
98-
120
110
11
Cu
118-
205
148
50
15-
90
52.5
5.3
14-
30
197
896
25-
70
53.7
• 25
Fe
1130-
2100
1680
500
1300-
1310
1300
70
950-
1820
1357
4,40
.8-
1.3
1010
200
Ni
" 140-
480
357,
188
380-
380
380
0.0
. 240-
510
350
114
100-
300
206
98.8
Cd
20-
50
37
15
32-
62
47
21
26-
51
78
82 :
24-
35
29.8
4.5
Zn


>250
0.0
80-
206
143
89
46-
200
• 128
109
68-
100
58
32
      X Mean of four observations
                            R- Range
                                      SD= Standard Deviation
is 180 cm tall with  a  cross-sectional area of 400 cm2,,  The.
filters are provided with a perforated tray at the top to per-
mit even flow distribution.,  The plastic media used in the study
are made of polypropylene (filter pack, Mass Transfer, Kendal,
England)„   The physical characteristics of the media are:
specific surface  area  118 m /m2, volume void ratio 0093 and
minimum irrigation rate 503 m3/m2d0   The media are packed
randomly in the filters.  The activated sludge unit used in  the
study is described elsewhere^-' ' „
     A schematic  of  the experimental phases of the study is  il-
lustrated in Figure  3,  Preliminary screening involved removal
of particulate matter, using a 165 mm mesh screen*  Following
plain sedimentation  for 12 hours, the supernatant was  used  in
a series of jar tests  to determine the optimum dose of coagu-
lants and pH  level.    The supernatant from the coagulation/
sedimentation unit was fed continuously to both the biofilters
and the activated sludge unit.  The effluents of  the  biological
treatment units were further treated in a double-stage filtra-
tion  system0    The filters comprise plexiglass columns  12  cm
in diameter  and 185  cm  in Iength0  The first  filter  contains
sand  with  Oo2. mm effective size and 605 uniformity coefficient.
                                 1099

-------
          •IOFILTER
FEED
               PLASTC
               WEDIA
                                             ft, lot RECYCLE
                                                  RECYCLE

                                                  RECYCLE
                          SINGLE STAGE PLANT
                            CLARIFIES
 FEED
                PLASTIC
                 KEDIA
                        TWO STAGE PLANT
                                           «••
-------
          z
          c>

          S
          te
          H
           CO
           g
3

1
           o
           o
           o
           m
            tc


            1
                 0
                 o
      Q.

      Ul
O
F
tc
r
                       M
                       a
                       z
            tt
            I-

            C
                 5
                 tc
                 CO
                 Ul

                 ai
                             z
                             o
                             I

                             3
                  UJ

                  s
                  I
                   5    S
                   8    3E    "
                   s    y    P
                   5    H
                              z
                              o


                        11
       o
                  o
                  UJ
                  CO
                  o
                  I
                  o
                  §
                  o
             2
             <     cs
             z     z
                              Ul
                              _J
                              CD
              <.
              cc
              t-
        LJ    _J
        Gj    r-     ^*
        or    5     H
        o    Q     «f
        CO    CD     3
M
0)
4-)
CC
&
QJ
4-1
O)
CO
£2

>>
!-i
QJ
P

CO
H
               .P
               Q)

               4-1
                           cn
                           P
                           •H
                           cO
                TO
                cn
                4)
                o
                o
                t-l
               PM
                o
                -H
                4-1
                CO

                .c
                O
                txi
                 QJ
                 M

                 OO
                         X   O
1101

-------
  too

  00

  eo

  70

J? CO
o

S
                A.) TURBIDITY
  20

  10
          4.6
                 S      SB

                 PH  VALUE
                                     e.B
   »o
 o 70
                B) COLOR
                                                       ALUM DOSE
                                       so
                                      100
                                      ISO
                                      200
                                      2SO
                            a	g   300
           4.3
 6      9.S

PM VALUE
  Figure A. Effect of  pH and  Alum Dose on  the Removal
             of  Turbidity and  Color  of Tannery Wastes.
                    1102

-------
 The  second  filter is  packed with  the  same sand mixed  with  1%
 w/w  powdered  activated carbon.
     The physico-chemical  characteristics and  trace metal  ana-
 lyses of the  raw and  treated wastewaters  were  determined accord-
 ing  to the  procedures  described in  the  Standard Methods
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Treatability of Tannery Wastewater

     An initial survey indicated that iron salts are not suit-
able coagulants, due to formation of intense black color.   It
is presumed that iron salts react with gallic acid in the tan-
nery_wastes to form this persistent color0  Formation of a
turbid, muddy-looking solution and non-settleable sludge pre-
cluded the use of lime for pre-coagulation of tannery waste-
waters.  As shown in Figure 4, appreciable removals of color
and turbidity were achieved by alum (Al2(SOA)o, 18 HoO)in the
range of 200-300 mg/1 .at a PH range of 6-6.5.  Alum coagulation
was also effective for removal of organic constituents and trace
metals (Table V)„
     Recycling of heavily tannery wastewater during biofiltra-
tion is indispensable as it appreciably improves the treatment
performance.  Figure 5 illustrates BOD removal, where recycling
              20O
400
                                 •00
                   800
                                M_ RECYCLE RATIO (%)
   Figure 5.  Effect of Recycle Ratio on Apparent and  True
             BOD Removal by Biofiltration.
                          1103

-------
                                          c-4 co  o\
                                          CM co  CT\
                                           CO f-(  CM
H B
                                           CM Ot  CM
         r-i     CN
8
                                         1104

-------
increases both true removal (So-Se) and apparent removal (So—Se),
where So, Se and Sa are the influent, effluent and applied BOD
after mixing with recycled flow, respectively.  An optimum re-
cycling ratio of 600% was selected for the biofiltration study.
Recycling of the precoagulated tannery wastewaters in the single-
stage biofilter produced moderate recovery of BOD, TOC,tannin,
phenol and trace metals (Table VI).  However, the recovery of
TKN was comparatively low.  The effluent of the single-stage
biofilter constitutes high levels of organics and chromium
which exceed the emission limitations for discharge into public
sewers and the sea.  Improved recoveries of various pollutants
were achieved in the double-stage system as shown in Table VI
and Figure 6«   The low recovery of TKN during biofiltration
is attributed to the presence of a high concentration of nitri-
fying NHg-N in the influent (100-136 mg/1) which is toxic to
bacteria and hence retards the nitrification process,,  The
average hydraulic rate in the biofilters was 0.02 l/m2 which
is much lower than the adequate rate for wetting  (0.062 1/m^  0S)
as recommended by the manufacturer 0  The high organic loading
and the low hydraulic rate contributed to the observed low
recoveries of the biofilters even when using the double-stage
system.   Application of a higher hydraulic rate in larger ins-
tallations is expected to enhance wetting and consequently im-
prove the overall treatment efficiency.)
     To compare the performance of biofiltration with other
treatment processes, a concurrent study using the Complete-Mix
Activated Sludge (CMAS) system was performed,, Table VII shows
the results of treatment of tannery effluent by the CMAS system
using 24 and 48 hours detention periods„  The CMAS operated at
BOD loadings of 205-409 kg/m30d, while maintaining an average
Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids  (MLSS) of 2300 mg/1 and Sludge
Volume Index (SVI) of. 67 mg/l0
     Aeration for 24 hours resulted  in moderate recovery of
BOD and TOC;  high recovery of  tannin, chromium and l^S;  while
the TKN removal was Iow0  Extended aeration  for 48 hours pro-
duced a slight improvement in  removal of most pollutants,,
Doubling the aeration time will result in significant increases
in capital and operating  costs  which are not justified by the
minor improvement in treatment  efficiency,,   Figure 7 illustra-
tes the comparative effects of  the biofiltration  and the CMAS
processeso  With the exception of  COD,both processes produced
more or  less similar recoveries of pollutants associated with
tannery wastewater0
     An  approach to the evaluation of removal of  soluble orga-
nics from industrial effluents  based on molecular size
                           . 1105

-------
 100
oo 50
•jj 40
  20
  10
          Double-Stage
          Single-Stage

             BOD
                              COD
                          TOC
     0  15 30 45 60
                         0   15  30  45   60
                 0  15 30 45 60
  100
   80
   60
oo
rt
0)
   40
   30

   20


   10
    8
    6

    4
       O&G
      0  15 30 45 60
TANNIN
                          0 15 30 45 60
                              Days
SR
                 0   15 30 45 60
     Figure 6.  Choronological Effect of Single-Stage and Double-
               Stage Biofiltration on Removal of Pollutants From
               Tannery Wastewater.
                              1106

-------
                100

                 70
                 50
                 40
                 30

                 20
                  10

                 ^ 7
                 W)

                 I
                 | 3

                 £2
	 CMAS
	 Biofiltration
                      O&G
                    BOD
                         II III IV V
                    I' II III IV V
                                              TO C
                         I II III IV V
                       I II III IV V
                                                                  COD
                                                                 I  II III IV V
                                               SR
                                                                    I II III IV V
                      I.  Plain Sed. ,  II. Precoagulation III. Biological Treatment
                      IV. Sand Filtration, V. Multi-media Filtration

                     Figure 7. Effect of CMAS and Biofiltration on Removal of
                               Pollutants of Tannery VJastewater.
_
                                              1107

-------
Table VII :  Effect of CMAS Detention Time on Removal of  Pollutents  from
            Tannery Wastewater
Parameter -
BOD
COD
TOC
SR
NH3-N
TKN
H2S
Tannin
Phenol
O&C
T-Cr.
Pb
Cu
Fe
Hi
Cd
Zn
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
Influent
24
hr.
2970
3166
383
407
132
137
98
243 ,
0.65
65
3.25
46
24.3
340
98
10
48
hr.
2050
4028
758
1276
152
163
5.0
213
0.33
60
2.0
103
29
270
173.3
20
74.3
24
(A)
70.5
50.0
63.4
45.5
24.2
11.7
99.7
75.3
96.9
80.8
88.9
16.3
17.7
24.3
15.3
0.0
Recovery
hr.
(B)
83.0
82.5
76.0
93.0
34.3
40.0
99.95
86.0
98.5
97.6
99.0
40.3
72.5
75.0
25.6
31.0
61.3
%

48 hr.
(A)
89.7
50.9
79.2
80.9
57.2
27.6
100
80.3
97.6
83.3
90.0
29.6
62.1
52.8
37.4
48.5
26.0
(B)
92.0
75.3
90.7
95.5
60.0
55.0
100'
89.0
99.0
98.4
99.6
69.7
87.0
77.3
59.0
66.0
73.6
 (A)  Recovery of the CMAS Process only.
 (B)  Overall Treatment Recovery.
 Table VIII :ESTIMATED TREATMENT COSTS OF TANNING WASTEWATER (Costs in US dollars)
 PARAMET
 1.  Capital Costs
     a. Primary (Screening, Sed. and Precoagul-
        ation)•
     b. Secondary  (biological).
     c. Tertiary(mixed media filtration ).
     d. Non-Component cost (piping, Instruments).

       Amortizations of Capital Costs ( 20 years)
                                                 ACTIVATED SLUDGE   BIOFJLTRATION
285,000          285,000
345,000          265,000
205,000          205,000
ISA.OOP          120,000
989,000          875,000
         98,900           87,500
  2.   Operating Costs
      a.  Chemicals
      b.  Power
      c.  Labor
      d.  Maintenance
120,000
 22,500
 15,000
 18,000
120,000
  2,500
  6,000
  5,400
      Percentage costs compared to  activated  sludge.
                                                             175,600
                                                             274,500
                                                                100
                         133,900
                         221,400
                            80.7
                                      1108

-------
distribution using Gel Chromatographic (GC) technique has been
detailed by Hamza and Tambo(9)o   xhe  organic constituents
which are easily eluted by water (Group I) are amenable to bio-
logical .treatment, while organics with high affinity with the
gel (Group II) require elution by NH^OH. This portion can be
effectively removed by tertiary treatment.  Schematic GC pat-
terns of raw wastewater and the effluent of the CMAS and bio-
filtration are illustrated in Figure 8,,  The GC patterns indi-
cate the presence of relatively high Group II constituents which
require further treatment for complete treatment.  Mixed media
filtration removed 80-85% of the residual Group II constituents.

Treatment Costs

     The cost estimates given in Table VIII reflect costs appli-
cable to centralized treatment of tannery effluent to produce  '
water suitable to discharge into the sea0   The estimates are
based on the projected discharge of 205 million cubic meters
annually after implementation of the renovation and expansion
plan of GOFIo  Cost estimates assume 20 years' service life and
5% low interest rate provided by the Egyptian Govovernment for
public secto.r industries.  Operating costs were based on prices
of 1982, and cost analyses were performed according to EPA
Guidelines v-^w 0   As shown in Table 9 the estimated cost of
biofiltration is less than that of the CMAS process„   Further
savings are expected if the clean water pool can be segregated
and discharged without treatment„.
     In case of lack of sufficient financial support, it is pro-
posed to install pre-treatment and biofilters first, while ad-
ding the post-filters at later stage0

Toxicity of Raw and Treated^Tannery Effluents

     The effect of raw wastewater on the survival of Cyprimus
carpio and Mugil cap;.to has been investigated as a complementary
part of the study^^) „   The mean survival time was 5 minutes
for hatched embryo, 1.4 hour for larval stage and 17„2 hours
for-juvenile stage of Cyprimus carpio and 1604 hours for juve-
nile stage of Mugil capitOo   The high toxicity is attributed
to the presence of high concentrations of trace metals, orga-
nic constituents, l^S salts and ammonia„   The 96 hours LC5Q
of the hatched embryo and larval and juvenile stages of Cyprimus
carpio exposed to the biofiltration effluent was achieved in
treated effluent diluted with water to 301%, 502% and 803%, res-
pectively.,  Although the treated waste was less toxic than the
raw waste, it is estimated that treated tannery waste must.be
                              1109

-------
                             Raw Wastewater
Figure
Biologically
          Treated Tannery Effluents,
                   1110

-------
diluted 40 times to reduce the fish toxicity to an acceptable
level.  The toxicity of the treated effluent is attributed to
the high concentration of NH3  (77 mg/1) which causes severe
histopathological changes in gill structure„  Ammonia stripping
is being investigated as an option to reduce fish toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS
     A centralized treatment system is proposed for the MIC
tannerieso  The treatment train encompasses precoagulations, bio-
filtration and post-filtration0  Among the treatment alternatives,
biofiltration is the most adequate due to lower operating costs,
suitability for intermittent flow, versatility and relative ease
of operation,,   The proposed treatment train complies with the
limitations for emission into the sea (except for NH3).  Reduc-
tion of the toxicity of the treated effluent can be achieved
by ammonia stripping or by dilution when mixed with sea water,,
Segregation of non-polluted effluents, originated in clean water
pools, from polluted wastes is expected to reduce treatment
costSo   Government subsidization of the centralized treatment
facility is necessary to encourage MIC tanneries to institute
the proposed treatment system,,
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
     This study was partially sponsored by the USEPA under Grant
No. PL-3-542-4o  The authors wish to express appreciation to the
staff of the IWRC at the High Institute of Public Health,
Alexandria, Egypt, for their valuable help0
                           nn

-------
REFERENCES

1. Smith, P., and Yates,  D.,  "Experience of High Rate Biological Filtration
   at Derby Sewage Treatment  Workers."   Water Poll.  Control (C.b)  79,198o,87.

2. Hosono, Y., and Kubota, H.,  "Characteristic Evolution of Trickling Filter
   Process." Water Res.  (G.B.)  14,1980,581.

3. Bailey, D., Robinson,  K.,  Collins,  S. and Clarke, J., " The Treatment of
   Effluents From a Chrome  Side Leather Tannery on a Conventional Biological
   FilLer ", J. Water Poll.  Control  Fed., 71, 1972,202.

4. Pierce, D., " Upgrading  Trickling Filters." Environmental Protection
   Agency, EPA 4309-78-004,1978.

5. Younis, M., " Study of Methods of Industrial Waste Treatment of Tannery.
   Wastes." MPI1 Thesis,  Alexandria University, 1982.

6. EPA, " Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines and New Sources
   Performance Standard  for Leather Tanning and Finishing Point Source
   Category." EPA, 440/1-74  - 016 a, 1974.

7. Hamza A., and Hamouda, F.  " Multi-process Treatment of Textile Wastewater"
    Proceedings of the 35th Annual Purdue Industrial Waste Conference,
   Ann Arbor Science' Publishing, 198o-152.

8. "Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater". Amer Pub.
   Health Assn., Washington,  D.C., 15th ed., 1890.

9. Hamza, A. and Tambo,  N.,  " Evluation of Dairy Waste Treatability by Gel
   Chronotography". Memories of the Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido Univ.,
   Japan, Vol XIV,4, 1977,44.

10. EPA  Guideling " Inovative and Alternative Technology Guidelines" EPA
    930/9-78.009,1980.

11. Zaki, M. and Saad, S., " Toxicity Assessment of Raw and Treated Tannery
    Hastes  Using Fish Bioassy." Symposium  on Acute Aquatic Ecotoxicological
    Tests Methodology, Standardization  and  Significance CERTIA, France,
    Nov.  1981.
                               1112

-------
               PART X:  INNOVATIVE RESEARCH
              Effect  of  Periodic  Flow Reversal
                   Upon RBC  Performance
     John T.  Bandy.   U.S.  Army Construction Engineering
     Research Laboratory,  Champaign,  Illinois.

     Manette  C.  Messenger.  U.S.  Army Construction Engineer-
     ing Research Laboratory,  Champaign,  Illinois.
Introduction

     Rotating Biological Contactors are traditionally
operated as a series of units through which water always
flows the same direction.  After the microbial film is
established on the RBC's, a characteristic pattern of growth
is seen across the stages:  growth is heaviest on the first
stages and diminishes with each sucessive stage once the
organic concentration falls to the level below which removal
is a function of .organic concentration.  The biological com-
munities on each stage change in response to their differing
environments.  The total growth on a stage is roughly pro-
portional to the organic concentrations which normally  occur
within it.

     When shock loadings occur across multistage RBC units,
downstream stages receive higher organic loadings than
usual. Studies of RBC response to shock loadings have
revealed that downstream stages have only a limited capacity
to treat these short duration excess loadings.  Much of a
shock load passes through an RBC untreated.
                           1113

-------
     The purpose of this research was to explore the feasi-
bility of increasing an RBC's capacity to treat shock loads
by periodically reversing the direction of flow across two
or more successive stages of an RBC installation.   This con-
cept was first suggested by Borchardt, et al.,  in June of
1978 as a result of their studies of RBC nitrification.*
RBC biofilms have been observed to grow more rapidly in
response to an incremental organic concentration than they
decay in response ,to an equal decrement.  This  characteris-
tic of biofilms suggests the possibility of increasing the
total inventory of film within several stages of an RBC by
periodically reversing the direction of flow across those
stages.  The period of reversal would be sufficiently long
to permit the concentration gradient across the stages to
re-establish itself in each direction but not so long that
the biofilm could adjust fully through growth and decay to
the new distribution of nutrients.  Under average flow con-
ditions, the RBC's performance shouldn't be significantly
affected.  The former earliest stage would see  a lower aver-
age concentration than under conventional flow  and would
presumably perform less removal.  However, the  former latter
stages would see higher average concentrations  and due to
the advantage of growth over decay they would develop
heavier growth which would remove those organics now passed
by the first stage.  Far more reserve capacity  would exist
to treat shock loads due to the greater inventory and more
even distribution of biofilm created by periodic reversal.

     An analogous mode of operation was explored for trick-
ling filters in England forty years ago.2  Flow was reversed
periodically across two filters in series in order to
prevent ponding on the more heavily loaded filter.  The
alternate heavy feeding and comparative starvation experi-
enced by the slime encouraged first growth and  then
endogenous respiration and sloughing.  Under the "alternat-
ing double filtration" mode of operation, much  less buildup
of slime and consequent ponding was observed.  When slowly
rotating distributer arms came into vogue, alternate feeding
and starvation became feasible within one filter.  Ponding
was seldom a problem and the alternating double filtration
mode of operation died out.  Its implications for treatment
efficiency and effluent variability were never  explored.
                            1114

-------
     This research will evaluate the flow reversal concept
in RBC's.  Today we will report our preliminary results.
More elaborate follow-up experimentation is now underway.
Materials and Methods

     A Clow pilot scale RBC was used in this research.   The
13 foot (4 m) diameter disks had a total area of 11000  sq.
ft. (1022 m2).  The media was set in a 2000 gallon (7.6 m3)
tank divided into four equal compartments to allow staging.
The media rotated at about 1.6 rpm.

     For purposes of this experiment, the plant was config-
ured as two 2-stage RBC's in parallel.  Only one pair was
actually sampled.

     We assumed that for flow reversal to have a significant
effect, organic concentrations in the reversed stages would
have to be low enough so that removals achieved depend  on
their fluctuations.  In some plants, the first stage or two
is saturated with respect to organics.  Higher organic  con-
centrations do not produce appreciably,higher removals  on a
mass basis.  Percent removals fall.  At these high organic
concentrations, the mass transport of oxygen into or waste
products out of the film is controlling.  The source of
wastewater for this experimentation was chosen to be the
partially treated effluent of an Imhoff tank.  This moderate
strength wastewater (8005 of approximately 100 nig/1) never
saturated the first stage of the Clow Corporation pilot
scale RBC plant used for the reversal experiments.

     Wastewater was pumped through the pilot RBC at flow
rates between 28,800 and 72,000 gpd (272 m3/ day).  The flow
was measured with an in-pipe flow sensor.  Hydraulic load-
ings varied from 2.6 to 6.5 gpd/ft 2 (.107 to .267
m3/in2/day).  The corresponding organic loadings were 1.67 to
4.17 Ib SCOD/1000 ft2/day.  The soluble ultimate BOD to
soluble COD ratio was variable but averaged .6.

     The influent and effluent wastestreams were sampled
every hour with ISCO automatic samplers.  Two ml of sulfuric
acid were added to each sample bottle before sample collec-
tion to stabilize the .sample.  No sample was more than 26
hours old when it was analyzed.
                            1115

-------
     The Hach Reactor Digestion COD method was used to
assess the RBC's performance.  This is an EPA approved
method which is convenient for the rapid analysis of large
numbers of samples.  All samples were filtered through What-
man No. 5 before analysis.  ThepH and temperature were meas-
ured daily while experimentation was underway.  Dissolved
oxygen rose from about 4 mg/1 in the influent to near
saturation in the effluent at the lowest organic loadings.
The dissolved oxygen profile across the system was essen-
tially flat at the highest loadings.

     Experimentation was performed in three phases.  First
the RBC was operated in the conventional manner for a period
of almost two months.  The flow rate during this period of
film establishment and maturation and base-line data collec-
tion was 28,800 gpd (109 m3/day).  Good removals (about 60
percent of the influent COD) were obtained by three weeks
after startup.  A severe thunderstorm then scoured off much
of the growth requiring us to install a cover and allow some
regrowth prior to experimental data collection.

     The second phase of the experiment involved daily flow
reversal.  During this phase, valves were opened and closed
immediately after the noon sampling to make the first stage
the second, and the second, the first.  Flow rates of 28,800
gpd (109 m^/day), 57600 gpd (218 m3/day) and 72,000 gpd (273
m^/day) were employed during this phase to allow the iden-
tification of any interactions between hydraulic loading and
flow reversal.  Reversal experiments continued for seven
weeks.

     The final phase of experimentation involved a return to
conventional one way flow.  During this phase, the higher
flow rates used for reversed flow studies were also applied
with conventional flow.
Results and Discussion

     The results of the experiments performed are presented
in Figure 1 and summarized in Table 1.  Flow reversal was
initiated after almost 2 months of consistent COD removals
with conventional flow.  Percent removals rose steadily dur-
ing the first 5 weeks of reversal despite greatly increased
hydraulic loadings.  This was a striking result since
                            1116

-------
hydraulic loading and percent, removal are normally either
constant or inversely related in a moderately loaded RBC.
When the hydraulic loading was reduced to the pre-reversal
level for the purpose of obtaining reversed flow performance
data directly comparable to the conventional flow baseline,
sloughing increased markedly.  Percent removals fell shar-
ply.  The earlier higher flow rate was restored and conven-
tional flow operation was resumed when this trend became
apparent so that the expected gradual return of the system
to baseline performance might be observed.  Performance was
falling at approximately the same rate as it had earlier
increased when a violent thunderstorm blew the unit's canvas
cover into the tank and broke the coupling between the
driven gear and the RBC shaft.  Before repairs could be made
and a suitable replacement cover procured, the unit froze up
for the winter, prematurely terminating experimentation.
                          Table 1

                 Results of Experimentation
                                             Fraction Removed
          •Type Data
       one way,
       reversal,
       reversal,
       reversal,
       reversal,
       reversal
       one way,
       one way,
20 gpm
 20 gpm
 40 gpm
 50 gpm
 40 gpm
 20 gpm
40 gpm .
50 gpm
// Observations

      64
      55
      40
      71
      54
      42
      36
      72
.473
.575
.625
.636
.722
.488
.641
.574
sd.

.132
.149
.086
.045
.053
.095
.082
.073
     During these preliminary experiments,  an average of 55
percent of the applied COD was removed under conventional
flow operation and 62 percent was removed with reversal.
The difference in the means was significant at the 1 percent
level based on 436 influent/effluent sample pairs.  Influent
concentrations showed no correlation with percent removals.

     The reversed flow effluents were less variable than
were the conventional flow effluents, especially when the
                            1117

-------
initial conventional flow baseline data were compared to the
reversed flow data.  However, the experiments were ter-
minated before the higher flow rate conventional flow
effluents reached a steady state.  Therefore, these data do
not establish a difference in effluent variability.

     Experiments are underway now in which two compartments
of the Clow pilot plant are operated as a conventional two-
stage RBC and the remaining two are reversed daily.  The
conventional flow control and the reversal experiment will
receive an identical influent and will operate under identi-
cal climatic conditions for several months.  An unequivocal
comparison of the two modes of operation will then be possi-
ble.  If the benefits of flow reversal suggested by the
early research are confirmed by this follow-up work, optimal
reversal periods can be identified and economic feasibility
analyses can be performed.
                         References
1.  Borchardt, J. A., Kang, S. J., and T. H. Chung, Nitrifi-
    cation of Secondary Municipal Waste Effluents by Rotat-
    ing Bio-Discs, EPA-600/2-78-061, June 1978.

2.  Hawkes, H. A., The Ecology of Wastewater Treatment, Per-
    gamon Press, Inc., New York, 1963.

3.  Banerji, S. K., ASCE Water Pollution Management Task
    Committee Report on "Rotation Biological Contactor for
    Secondary Treatment," Proceedings:  First National
    Symposium/Workshop on Rotating Biological Contactor
    Technology held at Champion, PA, Feb 4-6, 1980.
                            1118

-------
                       %  COD  REMOVAL
                _row-£oio>->joo*oo
            ooooooooooo
H-
era
c
l-t
(0
w
X
X)
fD
t-1
H-
3
rt
03
ro
en
c
en

"a
K>
OQ
n>
CD
o
ro
O
GJ
O
O
01
o
o
8
1 !• 1 1 III 1 1
o •* . ro
3 ' . • 0
I * * . 1
»< • 3
e
.1
-
a
i^
*
*
* . °
*
3
< • m
5 0
- (A •
2. *
-
1

*
• J^
•" °
*
8
I •
? 01
I - 0
' I
ill I i 1*1 i i I
                             nig

-------
1120

-------
                                       AN  ASSESSMENT OF
                    DISSOLVED  OXYGEN  LIMITATIONS  AND INTERSTAGE DESIGN
                         ROTATING  BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR (RBC). SYSTEMS
IN
                  Warren  H.  Chesner,  Engineering Consultants £ Associates,
                  Commack,  New York

                  John J.  lannone,  Roy F.  Weston, Roslyn, New York

                  Jeremiah  J.  McCarthy,  U.S.  Army 10th  Medical  Laboratory,
                  West Germany
               INTRODUCTION

                    Over 260 RBC systems are presently in operation in this
               country, with flowrates ranging from less than 0.1 to S^MGD (l).
               RBC systems have received much attention in recent years, in-
               cluding investigations by EPA of process, power, and equipment
               performance (2), and a National RBC Symposium in 1980 (3).
                    Numerous reports in the 1iterature and RBC facility surveys
               (1 , 4, 5, 6, 7, 8)  have reported difficulties with the initial
               stages of RBC systems reflected by heavy biofilm growth, the
               presence of nuisance organisms (beggiotoa), and a reduction
               in organic removal  rates.  These problems have been attributed
               to excessive organic loadings which result in dissolved oxygen
               deficiencies in the biofilm.  Recent unpublished surveys have
               reported results (9) which  indicate that nuisance organism
               growth may be precipitated exclusively by high sulfide concen-
               trations.
                     Empirical design approaches proposed by RBC vendors are
               presently used almost exclusively by engineers for RBC municipal
               wastewater treatment design.  Only one vendor design presently
               makes  reference to the aforementioned organic; overload condition
                (10).  A loading limitation  is recommended and defined  in terms
                                             1121
_

-------
of a limiting organic loading (e.g.  for a mechanical drive RBC
system, 4.0 lbs/day/1000 sf of soluble BOD loading on the first
                                                            by
            literature (11, 12)  have stressed the need for de-
sign techniques based upon fundamental  principles of substrate
and oxygen, transport and utilization to help define oxygen
limitations and stagewise kinetic parameters.  The development
of a mechanistically sound kinetic model for RBC's or any fixed-
film biological process, however, is extremely difficult due to
the complex relationships among transport and other kinetic
phenomenon which must account for both substrate and oxygen
transport and utilization.  The use of these complex models
design engineers is not practical.
     The empirical vendor approaches are simple  to use,  re-
quiring the input of flowrate and organic concentration  to
establish  a given design  surface area,  They are  limited  how-
ever   in that  they have no fundamental  basis to  account  for
organic removal, oxygen  limitations, staging requirements, step
feeding or recycle,  and do not  address  interstage  removal.
           On  the basis  of a  review  of  available  design  method-
ologies,  it  is  apparent  that  a  simplified approach  is desireable
to define  RBC performance on  the basis  of  rational  kinetics.
The approach  described  by Clarke et. al,  (11)  is a  reasonable
method which  defines interstage removal  on  the basis  of Monod
 growth functions,  and a mass  balance with  respect to  substrate
 across a  completely  mixed reactor.   No simple  model,  however,
 can account for the interaction between oxygen requirements  and
 substrate utilization.   The  design  of  RBC  systems at  the present
 time  then, is best undertaken in a simplified two-step approach
      Step  1,
       Step  2,
               Define limiting design conditions to pre-
               vent organic overloading and dissolved
               oxygen limitation.

               Utilization of a  rational design method
               to define the substrate  removal capacity
               of the RBC surface area  under conditions
               which are not oxygen  limiting.
       Under an ongoing contract with the Municipal  Environmental
  Research Laboratory of the U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency,
  data which define organic overload (oxygen limiting)  conditions
  were sought and an interstage model calibrated from field data
  collected from several operating facilities.
                              1122

-------
ORGANIC OVERLOAD  CONDITIONS
     Optimum  RBC  process  design  requires  that  the  microbial  sub-
strate utilization  rate  represent  the  rate  limiting  condition.
Under this condition,  the process  achieves  maximum use  of  sur-
face area because substrate  removal  is  limited  by  the ability of
the biomass to assimilate the waste  and no  extraneous factors
(e.g. lack of dissolved  oxygen)  limit  the rate  of  substrate  re-
,mova1.
     Except for the aforementioned vendor recommendations  con-
cerning organic loading  1imitat ions,  little data  is  available to
define the conditions  which  induce dissolved oxygen  limitations.
Williamson and McCarty (12), utilizing  their fixed film model,
predicted that dissolved  oxygen  limitations wpuld  occur at
soluble BOD (SBOD)  concentrations  of  kO mg/1, adjacent  to  the
biofilm.  This would correspond  to a  mixed  liquor  RBC reactor
concentration somewhat greater  than  ^0  mg/1  SBOD.   Field obser-
vations, 1iterature reviews, and telephone  interviews were made
to determine  influent  conditions which  result  in organic over-
loads.   Overloaded  conditions on an  RBC were identified by the
characteristic colonization  of  the media  by nuisance organisms
which gain a  competitive  advantage over other organisms under
oxygen deficient  conditions.  For  each of the facilities sur-
veyed, information  concerning nuisance ,organisms,  influent
organic concentrations,  and  hydraulic  loading were recorded  to
determine wastewater characteristics which  could be  associated
with these conditions.   The  survey included a total  of  twenty-
three facilities.   Results are  tabulated  in Table  I.
     A graphic presentation  of  these  results is presented
Figure 1, which depicts  a  plot of  total influent BOD on the
ordinate and  first-stage  hydraulic loading  on the  abscissa.
The graph presents a demarcation line that  separates facilities
which experienced first-stage overloading problems from those
which did not (i.e.  by the presence or absence of  nuisance or-
gan i sm) .
     The relationship  is  depicted  as a hyperbolic  function,
where the product of the  variables is a constant:

     (BOD)(Hydraulic Loading) =  Constant  Organic Loading

From the graoh, it can be  seen  that the organic loading  that;
separates plants with overloaded conditions   from plants  without
such prcble-s  is  6.^ pounds BOD/day/1000 sf.
i n
 Organic overload and oxygen  limitations are used interchangeably,
                               1123

-------
  TABLE I.   Organic Overloading Conditions Related to Influent
            Organic Concentration and Hydraulic Loading
Plant1
ID No.
1
2
A
5
8
10
12
13
14
15
16
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
3
6
9
11
36
Average
RBC Influent
BOD
Concentration
(mg/1)
125
48
50
182
47
169
85
55
96
98
72
93
175
145
505
350
336
180
118
152
144
96
213
Average
1st Stage
Hydraul ic
Loadi ng
(gpd/sf)
7.4
3.6
4.0
10.1
15.5
4.7
12.5
9.1
5.0
9.6
6.6
18.5
7-2
6.2
1.9
3.9
5.9
6.8
5.1
3.9
7.9
9.0
6.5
Cal culated
Average
1st Stage
Organic Loading
(Ibs/day/lOOOsf)
7,4
1.4
1.7
15-3
6.1
6.6
8.9
4,2
4.0
7.8
4.0
14.3
10.5
7.5
8.0
11.4
16.7
10.2
5.0
4.9
9.5
7.2
2
DO-Li mi 1 1 ng
Condi t ion
P
A
A
P
A
P
P
P
A
P
A
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
A
A
P
p
11.5 : P
i
  :   Except for air driven plant no,  16, all  are mechanical
     dr-fve facilities with no supplemental  air.
2
 A:   Plants experiencing no nuisance organism growth (absence)
     In the First Stage,
2
 P:   Plants experiencing problems with nuisance organism growths
     in the First Stage,
                            1124

-------
                             LEGEND
SOO
.. «.
E
z
2 3OO
K.
1-
z
u
0
z
o
o
o 2OO
O
ID
1-
X
1U
_j
z 100

o
ID
tc
C
| A PLANTS REPORTING PROBLEM
! . , NUISANCE ORGANISM GROWT
1 ADJACENT I.D. NUMBERS IDE
SURVEY PLANTS
\ 	 REPRESENTS AN ORGANIC L
1 BREAKPOINT OF 6.4 LBS 30
; 1000 SF
1
l _j4
. \
\
\
.35 5
6* \ *31 *9
\ f
3® •>s^
VN^. A12
1 1 I 1 l II t | i
> 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 2
FIRST STAGE HYDRAULIC LOADING ( GPD / SF )
                                              LOADING
FIGURE  } :  D.O. LIMITING CONDITIONS RELATED TO
            INFLUENT ORGANIC CONCENTRATION AND
            HYDRAULIC LOADING
                     1125

-------
INTERSTAGE MODEL CALIBRATION

     The Clarke model previously mentioned is based upon a mass
balance with respect to substrate across an assumed completely
mixed RBC stage at steady-state which can be written as follows:
    '  =  FSo  -  FS]  -  ^X A


     reactor liquid  volume (volume)
                                                    (Equation 1)
whe re,
     V

     -j— = change of substrate concentration with time
          (mass/volume  • time)

     F  = wastewater flow rate  (volume/time)

     S  = influent organic concentration  (mass/volume)

     S. = effluent organic concentration  (mass/volume)

     y  = specific growth rate of attached RBC microorganisms

          (Vtime)

     Y  = apparent yield of attached RBC  microorganisms
          / mass biomass produced %
           mass substrate consumed

     X  = mass of attached microorganisms per unit area
          (mass/area)
     A  = RBC surface area (area)

This equation assumes that the  intensity  of mixing in each stage
is sufficient for complete mixing, and that organisms decay  is
small compared to the growth  rate, and that all substrate re-
moval  Is due to attached biomass.

     Using the Monod growth function:

                 S,
V = V
                   1
          max
-)    and,
                                                     (Equation 2)
                           max
                           Y
                         A X
                               (Equation 3)
                            1126

-------
defi ni ng ,
       _
       -
and,
          max
              v      ,
              *> as tne area capacity constant
                 (i.e. maximum substrate which
                 could be  removed per unit area
                 per unit  time)
then,
                                            (Equation k)
                       ' as t'ie remova' coeffiecient  (Equation 5)
                        (actual substrate  removed
                        per unit area per  unit  time)
     at steady-state  V Pp) = 0

and,       PS,
     ,R =
             1
                 , or
                                            (Equation 6)
Kc
P~
                                                     (Equation 7)
     A major feature of the Clarke model  is  its use of a rational
approach for defining substrate removal converting the terminol-
ogy into design parameters which are readily used in the field
today:  R, the removal coefficient which  reflects the organic
removal rate, can be defined in terms of  pounds/day/1000 sf, and
P, the area capacity constant, which represents the maximum re-
moval  rate possible, can also be described in terms of pounds/
day/1000 sf.
     To calibrate the Clarke model,  interstage soluble BOD1 data
was collected from eleven RBC facilities  selected with three to
six RBC stages where organic overload  (i.e. greater than
6.4 lbs/day/1000 sf BOD organic loading)  did not exist.  Organi-
cally overloaded faci1ities were screened for two reasons:
     1.  the organic removal rate of these facilities are
         highly variable as a result of nuisance organism
         interference and the influence of DO deficiencies
         on substrate removal rate; and,
     2,  the intent of the designer as presented is to avoid
         this condition (i.e. insure that design is not or-
         ganically overloaded by keeping  the loading level
         below the DO-1imi ting level).
 Interstage data available at the eleven facilities was soluble
 BOD (SBOD).
                              1127

-------
                                           area,  R,  and  the
                                           the  model was  cali-
The eleven facilities provided influent values of soluble BOD
from 10 - 95 mg/1, with a 55 mg/1 average value.  Hydraulic
loadings ranged from 0.4 - 1.5 gpd/sf with a 1.3 gpd/sf average
value.
     Using both the organic removal per unit
soluble BOD concentration in the reactor, S,
brated as follows:

     Values of ( /R) vs  ( /S) for each stage of all eleven
     plants were plotted to yield a straight  line with a

     slope of K /P and a y-intercept of  /P, per Equation ?•

     The maximum removal rate, P, and the half velocity co-
     efficient, K  , were computed from this graph.

This graphical analysis for the four consecutive stages is pre-
sented  in Figures  2 and 3, respectively.2  The  results of the
four consecutive stages are presented in Table 2.
  TABLE 2.  Calibrated Maximum  Removal  Rate, P, and
            Half Velocity  Coefficients,  K   (Soluble  BOD)
Stage No.
1
2
. *
Maximum Removal Rate, P
(GPD/SF • mg/1)
1000
667
400
100
(Lb/Day/1000 SF)
8.34
5.56
3-34
0.33
Half Velocity
Coefficient, K
(mg/1)
161
139
82
25
Straight lines were drawn through the data, visually
weighting the distribution of data points and screening
data which were judged as outliers.
                           1128

-------
8
\ . . 1
\

\ .
- \ *
\ :
. \. ...
\
*^»
•^^ *
••^v
1 , ! 1 1 1 1 1 . I \
d
0
CM
0
—. e w
Z, ui
- <
d OT i—
^ CO
IO
o
d
f-»
o> ea . N- <' -
_J
z
<
1—

0
^

Ul
tr
C9
u_






     )  a/i
1129

-------
\
\ . •
V
\
\
\
» \ "
\ -
\
• :•• \- <
V '."
%
• \
o
o
o

0 „
o e
^^
o
3§

g
d

<-s
3 10 O « **
3 -. . - o
a 0 0 X





UI
Cf>
H
co







     ( BUI/I - Qd9/JS )  U/l
                                               CO
                                               o:
                                               CO
                                               CO




*




1 I
en CO
0 0
d o
• \ l
\
•» » —
\ '
. \
•\
".\
\- -
\
i i i i i i i \
•?
CM
d
o

o
d g 10
O ^ UJ
d ^j
CO |—
0 ~
d

r\
^ (D 
111
o:
CO
u.







( &UJ/I • QdO/dS)  H/l
             1130

-------
     Values of effluent concentration in each stage can be ex-
pressed as a function of flowrate, influent concentration and
surface area by setting Equation 5 equal to Equation 6 and
solving for the effluent concentration, S.,  as follows:
    F.
K — ~i  *» o  ~
    A.   o
                         P-.S.
                        r\   r* «
                        KS+.S.
                                                (Equation 8)
The effluent concentration for any stage can be expressed as:
S. =
CCHL.(SO- K.)>,P.
                              - K.)- p.
                                                           . x SQ)
                             2CHL.)
                                                      (Equation 9)
where,
      S  =  influent SBOD concentration  (mg/l)
       o
     HL. =  hydraulic  loading  (gpd/sf)

      S. =  effluent SBOD concentration  (mg/l)
       T         ..                  .
      P. =  area  capacity constant  (I/day)

      K. =  half  velocity coefficient  (mg/l)

      F. =  wastewater flowrate (gpd)

      A. =  area  (square feet)

        i =  denotes  RBC stage  under analysis

 To determine the hydraulic loading given the influent concentration
 and the  required effluent  concentration, Equation 8 can be re-
 arranged  as follows:
               (P.)CS.)
      Hi   -
      HLi ~ CK.
             S.)(S  - S.)
         110    i
                                                (Equation 10)
                            1131

-------
     To assess the accuracy of the calibrated interstage (4 stage)
model, a comparison between the observed field performance of six-
teen RBC facilities and the model  was  undertaken.1
      The sixteen  facilities were divided  into  influent  concen-
 tration ranges of 52,  97,  1^8  and  2\k mg/1,2   In order  to  compare
 the  model, which  expresses  BOD in terms of  soluble  BOD  (SBQD) ,  an
 SBOD:BOD ratio of 0.5  was  assumed
      The model  is compared  to  regression  lines of field perform-
 ance in Figure 4.   The top  graphic of Figure  4 presents the  data
 as organic removal  in  lbs/day/1000 sf vs  hydraulic  loading in
 gpd/sf; the  bottom graphic  as  organic removal  vs organic loading,
 both in lbs/day/1000 sf.   The  regression  line extends across  the
 range of loading  conditions  (hydraulic  and  organic)  observed  in
 the  field.   From  Figure 4,  it  can be seen that the  model  is  more
 accurate  (i.e. with respect  to the regression line)  for the  lower
 concentration ranges,  the  lower hydraulic loading  ranges and  the
 lower organic loading  ranges.
      The lack of  correlation  at higher  concentrations and  load-
 ings can be  attributed to  the  fact that:

 a.    the model  uses the Monod growth function to account for
      both  substrate utilization and mass  transfer.   In  fixed
      film  systems mass transfer, however, is dependent  upon
      reactor concentration (i.e. actually the concentration
      adjacent to the film).   Higher influent concentrations
      would exhibit greater mass transfer  driving forces
      which would
      a substrate
increase values of P and
deficient system.
K  ca1i brated i n
      the model was not designed to predict removal in
      organic overloaded environments and at the higher
      loadings where the model does not correlate well,
      first stage loadings may exceed design levels
      (e.g. greater than 6.4  lbs/day/1000 sf).
 'Primary clarifier BOD removal was assumed to be 30% for each
  facility with primary clarifiers,
 "Detailed data concerning these sixteen facilities are presented
  elsewhere  (2),
                               1132

-------
t:
CO

8
o
o
o
03

CO
CD 3
>2
O '
s
UJ
K.


O «
o
K.
O
        	 ACTUAL

        	PREDICTED

        * CONCENTRATIONS REPRESENT
          INFLUENT CONDITIONS
                _L
                             JL
                                          _L
                                                      _L
                 I             2            34

                HYDRAULIC   LOADING   (GPD/SF)

          ORGANIC REMOVAL VS.  HYDRAULIC  LOADING
o
§
0
o
m

23
|2

tu
K.
O
o:
o
                              ,
 	—APPROXIMATION OF DESIGN

    PREDICTIONS FROM DATA POINTS

       « 52 mg/1 BOD INFLUENT

       A 97 mg/1 BOD INFLUENT

       « KB mg/1 BOD INFLUENT

       B 214 mg/1 BOD INFLUENT

 	LINEAR REGRESSION, ACTUAL

J	l__
                                                 ,
                                                       ,
          1      2345678

             ORGANIC  LOADING   { LBS BOD/D/IOOO SF )

            ORGANIC  REMOVAL VS. ORGANIC  LOADING


      FIGURE  4=  COMPARISON OF ACTUAL PERFORMANCE

                  TO  DESIGN  PREDICTIONS
                            1133

-------
MODEL ANALYSIS

     The major advantage of a model such as the one described and
calibrated here is its ability to predict the effect of changes
in system characteristics, such as staging and step feeding, upon
RBC performance.  In performing these .analyses, it must be re-
called that the model was intentionally calibrated under condi-
tions which were organically underloaded.   As a result, advan-
tages or disadvantages  of various process variations apply only
to those conditions.
Staging

     Assuming an influent BOD = 100 mg/1  (
and a flowrate of  1.0 million gallons per
model was used to  predict the benefits of
the amount of surface area required to ach
50, 60, 75, 85, and 95 percent.  The resu-1
Figure 5  indicate  that multistage systems
area than single stage systems to achieve
removal,  up to a point.  For the influent
optimum staging would be as follows:
  i.e.  SBOD = 50 mg/1),
  day,  the interstage
  staging by assessing
  ieve  efficiencies of
  ts illustrated i n
  require less surface
  a given percentage
  condition indicated,
      Desired  Percent  Removal

                50
                60
                75
                85
                95
Number of Stages

        1
        2
        3
        3
 Caution,  however,  must  be used  when  increasing  the  number   of
 stages  to insure that an  organic overloading  condition  is  not
 created (i.e.   loading  per stage exceeds  6,4  lbs/day/1000  sf),
 Step Feeding

      At the same influent condition,  an analysis  of the advan-
 tages of step feeding was undertaken.   The analysis was under-
 taken by assigning P and K  values to each stage  to account for
 the relative quantities of influent flow which are being diverted
 to downstream stages, but which exhibit kinetics  associated with
 the initial stages of the system.  For example, if 75 percent of
 the flow entered the first stage and 25 percent the second stage
                              1134

-------
  vf
  e s
  o 9
  00
  CD _l
  OT U.
  Ul


  U.
  z
                                               j-
                                                 O)
                                                 tlj
                                                 o
                                                 <

                                                 CO
                                                      ll.
                                                      o
                                                      cc
                                                      111
                                                      CO
                                                            CO

                                                            z
                                                            UJ
                                                       DC

                                                       13
                                                       O
                                                       UJ
                                                       CC
                                                       U
                                                       or
                                              hJ
                                              o
                                              <
                                              U.
                                              DC
                                              r>
                                              CO

                                              2:
                                              o
                                                            o
                                                            <

                                                            to

                                                            u_
                                                            o
                                                            o
                                                            UJ
                                                            u_
                                                            U.
                                                            UJ
o
o
in
to
  O
  o
  o
  10
o
o
to
CJ
o
o
o
CM
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
(coi
                vaav Hovjans aaamoaa
                                IU
                                cc
                                13
                            1135

-------
of a k stage system, then 75 percent of the flow would experience
removal  on the basis of running the model  consecutively through
four stages, with values of PjKj, P2K2' P3K3 and P4K*t for the
four stages.  Twenty-five percent of the flow would experience
the removal associated with a three stage system with values of
P K., P_K2 and P K  for the three stages.   The final effluent was

calculated as a material balance of the two flows.  A schematic
representation of this analyses is presented in Figure 6.  Vari-
ous combinations of step feeding were examined, with no advantage
indicated under any conditions and decreasing efficiencies noted
if too great a percentage of flow was diverted to the latter
stages.
CONCLUSIONS
     1.  A limiting organic  loading to the first stage of
         6.k  lbs/day/1000 sf of BOD (total BOD) was found
         to be the organic loading beyond which nuisance
         organism growth and corresponding process per-
         formance problems occur,

     2.  An interstage model was calibrated at organic
         concentration in a  range of 50 -  100 mg/1 BOD
         for  systems which were not overloaded.  The
         model  illustrates the advantages of staging
         when high efficiencies are desired.  The model
         did  not  Indicate any advantage to step feeding
          in systems  that are organically  underloaded,

     3.  The  design  of RBC systems  is best undertaken
         with two  independent criteria.   The first to
         establish the desired surface area and staging
         arrangements, and the second to  ensure that no
          stage  is organically overloaded.  The organic
          loading  limitation  presented here  is considered
          a good  design criteria  to  prevent oxygen  limi-
          tations.  Additional data,  is required to
          establish an  accurate  rational  interstage model
          to predict  RBC  performance.
                              1136

-------
                                  o
                                  UJ
                                  UJ
                                  u.


                                  0.
                                  UJ
                                  I-
                                  (O
                                  vD


                                  UJ
                                  cc
1137

-------
REFERENCES:

(1)   Chesner, W.H., and lannone, J.J., "Current Status of
      Municipal Wastewater Treatment with RBC Technology  in
      the US," presented at the Feb. 4-6, 1980,  First National
      Symposium on RBC Technology, held at  Champion, PA.
(2)   Chesner, W.H., and lannone, J,J,, "Review of RBC Design
      Procedures and Process, O&M, Equipment and Power Perform-
      ance," Municipal  Environmental Research Laboratory, U.S.
      Environmental Protection Agency, unpublished,
(3)   Smith, E.D., Miller, R.D., and Wu, Y.C,, Editors, "Pro-
      ceedings of the First National Workshop on Rotating Bio-
      logical Contactor Technology," held at Champion, PA,
      February 4-6, 1980.
(4)   Lagnese, J.F., "Use of Supplemental Air to Correct an
      Oxygen Limitation Condition of an Operating RBC System,"
      presented at the February 4-6, 1980,  First National
      Symposium on RBC Technology, held at  Champion, PA.
(5)   Selden Sanitary Corporation, "Report  on Nitrification,"
      prepared by Henderson and Bowdwell, Plainview, NY,
      December 1977.
(6)   Hitdlebaugh, J.A,, and Miller, R.D,,  "Full Scale RBC for
      Secondary Treatment and Nitrification," presented at the
      February 4-6, 1980, First National Symposium on RBC
      Technology, held at Champion, PA,
(7)   Wood, Paul K., "Report:  Survey of Sewage Treatment Plant,
      Winchester, KY," State Compliance Report, Kentucky Bureau
      of Environmental  Protection, August 3-4, 1976,
(8)   Dobrowolski, F.J., Brown, J.M., and Bradley, F.M., "Testing
      Rotating Biological Contactors for Secondary Treatment in a
      Converted Primary Tank," presented at the Water Pollution
      Control Association of Pennsylvania,  August 8, 1974.
(9)   Personal communication, Richard Phillips, State of Vermont,
      Environmental Conservation Agency.
(10)  Auto&Lol VUJJQYI Manual, 1979.
(11)  Clark, J.H., Moseng, E.M., and Asano, T,, "Performance of
      a Rotating Biological Contactor under Varying Wastewater
      Flow," JounnaJL WPCF 50, (5), 896, 1978.
(12)  Williamson, K. and McCarty, P.L., "Verification Studies
      of the Biofilm Model for Bacterial Substrate Utilization,"
      louJinaJt WPCF, 48,  (2), 281, 1976.
                               1138

-------
     COMBINED BIOLOGICAL/CHEMICAL  TREATMENT IN  RBC-PLANTS.
     Hall yard 0degaard,   Division of Hydraulic & Sanitary
     Engineering, University of Trondheim,  NTH, Norway.
INTRODUCTION

     Over the last 5 years, there has been an increased use of
rotating biological contactors (RBC's) in Norway.  Out of a
total of about 500 sewage treatment plants in the country, 52
(~ 10%) are RBC-plants.              '
     Since eutrophication is a major pollution problem in the
Norwegian waterways, chemical  treatment to remove phosphorous
is extensively used.  Of the 52 RBC-pTants, 48 of them are com-
bined biological/chemical plants.
     The main objective for establishing chemical treatment in
combination with biological treatment in RBC's is of course
to remove phosphorous.  In addition  it is experienced,however,
that the addition of a chemical precipitant (normally alum  or
ferric iron) will improve the effluent quality by coagulation
of the fine fraction of biofilm that often is difficult to
settle.  Therefore the chemical treatment serves a dual pur-
pose.                                       •
     Chemical treatment may be achieved in combination with
RBC's by principally three process designs (fig.1), hereafter
named:
     - Simultaneous precipitation
     - Combined precipitation
     - Post precipitation
                               1139

-------
         r
            Precip it ant add! tion

>^»
— »-
ill.
ill
» * i i 1 *
HlHt
1!
1!!
Mi

1
I'rlt
i
I 	 L
H
!


R8C

-*•
/ Final settlinc
         SIMULTANEOUS  PREC 1PI TAT 1 ON
                    i . i j i « ; ,' ,
                    iiiill
                                         Precipitant addition
          R8C               Flocc. .

         COMBINED PRECIPITATION
Final settling

—
t
i
<>i
ill
i!
• |
•ii
' J 1. 1 i :
i i ' 1 ' ' 1 '
1 , I'!! ':,',.
Iliiijii.
RBC
-:- - J<
^ • 4f
1
1
4-
f
*
fi
*l
3
j1
	 / Settling Floccul.
— Precipitant addition
— 1»- .
	 f Final settl ing
        POST PRECIPITATION
Fig.  1. Different  combined biological/chemical  treatment
         processes.
                              1140

-------
In simultaneous precipitation the precipitant is added to the
RBC tank, the precipitation occurs here and the precipitated
matter is removed together with the biofilm suspended matter
in the following separation unit, normally a sedimentation
tank.  Since flocculation occurs in the RBC-tank,a floccula-
tion tank between the RBC and the settling unit is normally
not included.
    Post-precipitation plants consist of biological and chemi-
cal treatment completely separated from each other.  The RBC
has its own settlingtank followed by the chemical step5consis-
ting of chemical mixing^flocculation and separation of floes.
    As will be shown later, the major part of the combined
biological/chemical RBC-plants in Norway are designed for
combined precipitation.  Compared to the traditional post-
precipitation plant, the settling unit for the RBC-sludge is
here omitted.  The precipitant is added to the RBC effluent
and the whole suspension (biological and chemical sludge) is
then flocculated before combined sludge removal in settling
units.
    In this paper, an overview over the Norwegian experiences
with combined biological/chemical treatment in RBC plants will
be given first, and thereafter a special project concerning
the comparison of simultaneous precipitation and combined pre-
cipitation will be reported.

     THE USE OF RBS PLANTS  IN NORWAY - AN OVERVIEW.

    The general picture of  sewage treatment in Norway in
Norway is as follows:
    - Most of the plants are small.  About 50% of the total
      number of plants  (about 500 plants) has a connection of
      less than 500  personequivalents, and about 93% of the
      plants are for.less than 10.000 person equivalents.
    - Chemical precipitation is  extensively used either alone
      of in combination with biological processes.
    - All  the plants are built-in, either in houses  (most of
      the  plants) or in halls blasted into the rocky mountains
      (the bigger plants).   This  is so because of the strict
      labour environment rules and the cold climate  during
      winter.
    Based  on a questionnaire to  the environmental protection
authorities  in all the  counties,  information about  the RBC
plants was gathered.
                            1141.

-------
In table 1  the total  number of RBS plants are grouped accord-
ing to their size and process design.
Table 1.  RBS-plants in Norway grouped according to size and
          process design.
Process
design
Without
precipitation
Simultaneous
•precipitation
Combined
precipitation
Post
precipitation
Total
Size in personequivalents
> 500
2
2
18
1
23
> 500-1000

'
8
1
9
>1000-2000
1

11
,1
1-3
> 2000
1
"'!, 	
5
1
7
Total
4
2
42
4
52
 It  is  demonstrated  that  combined  biological/chemical  treatment
 is  the normal  (48  out of 52 plants)  and  that  combined precipi-
 tation is  the  biological/chemical  process  design  mostly  used
 (42 out of 48  plants).
       The  principal  reason  for  the popularity of  this process

       - The pollution authorities has  accepted this  design  to
         give an effluent quality  comparable to what  is expec-
         ted from post-precipitation plants.
       - While  post-precipitation  with  RBC  has not been invest-
         ment economically competitive  with post-precipitation
         based  on activated sludge, combined precipitation has,
         because of the savings  by omitting the RBC settling
         unit.
       There has also been questions whether not simultaneous
 precipitation  also could give results  comparable  to  combined
 precipitation.-  If so, the flocculation  tanks could  also be
 omitted.  Since all the plants  are built in,  it is obvious
 that savings in the area of the plants will give  considerable
 savings in the total investment cost.   The main objective of
 the project reported later in this paper was to investigate
                           1142

-------
this matter.

Effluent quality
~The information about effluent quality where not complete
for all the 52 plants, partly because many of the plants are
so new that the pollution authorities have not started their
control program yet and partly because information from the
county  authorities was incomplete.  In table 2 is summarized
results of 24 plants where effluent quality has been analyzed
on flow proportional samples repeatedly taken over one year.
The plants have been divided into two groups (^ 1000 person-
equivalents) .
All the plants included in table 2 are combined precipitations
plants.


Table  2.  Mean effluent quality from Norwegian biological/
          chemical  RBC-plants  (combined precipitation)
Size group j Tot P
Person equiv. ppm
< 1000 pe
>_ 1000 pe
1,27
0,39
Number
Samples
42
70
of
Plants
12
12
BOD 7
ppm
24-
15
Number
Samples
35
70
of
Plants
12
12
 It can be seen that the smaller plants have problems with mee-
 ting the effluent standard of phosphorous for this group
 (< 0,8 mg P/&).  This  is mainly because of operational diffi-
 culties with the chemical equipment.   In the bigger plants how-
 ever, which are well operated, the average effluent quality  is
 below the effluent quality standard for bigger post-precipita-
 tion plants in Norway(<_ 0,5 mg P/£, _<  20 mg  BOD7/£).

 Operational experiences
      There are presently 10 different RBC-products represented
 among the Norwegian RBC-plants.  The smaller plants (< 500 pe)
 are dominated by local products.   In the larger plants, three
 products dominates completely:
      - Bio-surf (Aerosurf)
      - Enviro.disc
      - Nova
      It is not possible from the  data collected  to state as to
 whether any of there products give better effluent quality than
 the other.  In the bigger, well operated plants they all give
                             1143

-------
effluents quality results that is expected from post-precipi-
tation plants « 0,5 mg PA, < 20 mg BOF7/A).
     We have in Norway, as in most countries, I guess, exper-
ienced mechanical failures with the RBC plants, and because of
this,I can say that the popularity of the RBC's has faded some-
what lately.

     Another problem that is experienced,is that nitrification
in the RBC reduces the alkalinity so much that it is difficult
to maintain sufficiently high pH for chemical precipitation.
Alum is normally used as precipitant and pH is then normally
5,0-6,5  in the  precipitation step.
RESULT FROM A RBC-PLANT WITH COMBINED PRECIPITATION
     For a period  of over two years the influent and effluent
quality en flow proportional samples have been monitored at
Vinstra RBC sewage treatment plant which is operating accord-
ing to the combined precipitation mode.
     The plant is designed for 5100 personequivalents with a
design flow of 140 m3/d.  The flow diagram for the plant is
shown in fig.2.
     The plant receives municipal and dairy wastewater and in
addition,external septic sludge is dewatered at the plant.
Reject water from this  septic handling contributes signifi-
cantly to the composition of the raw water.  The precipita-
tion chemical is aluminium-sulphate of the AVR-quality
(a Swedish product consisting of a combination of alum- and
ferricwsulphate).  The  dosage of 130-140 mg AVR/£ (about
n-lzW) Al/O is fed flow  proportional  to the water down-
stream the biodisc units.
     As will be shown later, the average BOD7 - concentration
in the raw water is about 320 g 0/m3 and the average daily
flow 1200 m3/d.   Presupposed that a BOD-reduction of 30% will
occur in the presetting units, the organic area loading is
19 g BOD7/m2.d, which is about the Norwegian design criteria
for combined biological/chemical RBC plants.  (< 20 g BOD7/m2-
     The average treatment  results from  this plant over the
last two years is shown in  table 2.
     The data in table  2 clearly demonstrate  that a well oper-
ated combined precipitation RBC-plant can give an effluent qual-
ity of at least the same quality as traditional post precipi-
tation plants based on  activated sludge  can.
d)
                            1144

-------
                                     O
                                     CO
                                     pi

                                      c:
                                      o
                                     . Q-
                                     '•i—
                                      O
                                     .

                                      CL'
                                     -a
                                      CD
                                      o
                                      o
                                      (O
                                     "o

                                     1Z

                                       •
                                     CM


                                      CD
1145

-------
 Table 2.  Average 2-year result from the Vinstra
           combined precipitation RBC plant.
 Parameter     in,g/m-
out, g/m;
COD
BOD7
Total P
SS
578 ±240
322 ±155
8,49±4,2
267 ±148
30 ±15
10 ± 4
0,18+0,13
7 ± 4
94,8
96,9
97,9
97,4
24
23
23
24
AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON BETWEEN COMBINED AND
SIMULTANEOUS PRECIPITATION.

     An experimental investigation was carried out during fall
1981, with the objective of studying combined precipitation at
extreme loading and of comparing combined precipitation and
simultaneous precipitation.  Since the before mentioned Vinstra
plant, has two paralell treatment lines, this plant was chosen
as experimental site.  Two different investigation periods were
carried out.  In the first period,all of the water was led
through only one of the treatment lines after the RBC tanks.
In the other investigation period, the flocculation tanks in
one  of the treatment lines were  short - circuited, so that com-
bined and simultaneous precipitation could be investigated in
paralell with each  other on the  same settled raw water.
     The two treatment lines are shown in fig.3 where the samp-
ling points are marked.  The samples were taken as flow-propor-
tional samples and  were analyzed for total and soluble COD,
total and soluble PO^-P, and suspended solids.  In addition
the  secci-depth at the  end  of the secondary settling tanks were
monitored.  Since we here  are  mainly interested in the funct-
ioning of the  biological/chemical treatment  system, the  raw
water composition described later is that obtained from  the
outlet of the  primary  settlers.
     The first investigation period  lasted for one week  and
the  second  for three weeks.  The samples were  taken daily and
analyzed  immediately at  the plant.
      In  the second  period  the  point  of  precipitant addition
was  changed during  the period  in order  to see  if this influ-
enced  the results.
                              1146

-------
ro
T3
c
o
                                TJ
                                41
t-
a
•o
c
o

-------
     In the first period we wanted to investigate how high
hydraulic loading influenced the, treatment result.  As can be
seen from table 3 the average daily  overflow rate on the final
settling unit was 20 m3/m2-d, corresponding to an average max-
imum overflow rate of 1,6 m3/m2-h.  The Norwegian design cri-
teria for this kind of process is 1,3 m3/m2-h.
     If so happened that the settled influent in the first
period was also very concentrated, partly due to a significant
contribution of septic sludge dewatering reject in this period.
Table 3. Organic and hydraulic loadings (^ Calc. values)



Ave.org. area/load
gCODTot/m2-d
gCODsol/m2-d
gBODs /m2-d1'
Tot ,
gBOD5 -/m2-du
sol
Ave . mi n . deten ti on
time in floccula-
tors
min.
Ave. max overflow
rate in final
settlers
m3/m2'h
Norw.
design
criteria



18






20



1,3
Period 1 ! Period 2
Comb.prec. I Comb. Simult.


57
26
29

14




20



1,6


36 36
10 10
19 19

5 5




50 0



0,6 0,6
 This led to a very high average organic area  loading,
 57gCOD/m2-d  based on total  COD and 26 g  CODSQl/m2-d  based
 on soluble COD.  We have a pretty good knowledge about the
 correlations between BOD5  and COD on this water and based  on
 the monitored COD-values5 we  can calculate the BOD-loadings
 to have been 29 g BOD5/m2-d  based on total BOD5 and 14 g
 BOD,
     ;sol
/m2-d based on soluble BOD5.
                              1148

-------
     This means that the plant was both hydraulically and orga-
nically overloaded.  The organic load was actually consider-
ably over what we had anticipated it to.be, namely about the
maximum load adviced in the Norwegian design criteria (see
table 3).  •        .
     In the second period the hydraulic loadings were lower
partly because the amount of raw water was lower in this per-
iod, but mainly because the incoming flow was divided into the
two lines.  The organic area load was however approximately
what was expected, very near the Norwegian .design criteria.
     In both periods the precipitant dosage was kept at its
normal value, 135 g alum/m3 added flow proportional to the in-
coming water.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In table 4 are summarized the average treatment result from
the two periods.

Table 4.  Treatment results.
Parameter
CODTot in
out
CODsol.in
out
P0*-ptot.in
out
P0lt-Psol in
out
Period 1
Combined
561 ±220
31+ 10
287+137
21+ 9
6,5+2,4
0,34±0,18
5,6+3,4
0,02+0,01
SS out 13+1
Secci depth
(cm) -
163+33
Period
Combined
409+104
!57+ 30
110+ 35
34± 19
6,7+1,6
0,39+0,21
2,0±0,56
0,04+0,03
27±9
85+39
2
Simultaneous
409+104
72+ 29
110± 35
34+ 22
6,7+1,6
0,59+0,13
2,0+0,50
0,05+0,02
. 37+12
50+18
                              1149

-------
In spite of the extremely high "loading in the combined preci-
pitation line in investigation period 1,the plant gave still
very good effluent, quality similar to what normally was achi-
vied at hydraulically only half the load previously.  The COD-
values in the effluent corresponds to BOD5-values of less than
5 g BOD5sol/m3 and less than 10 g BOD5tot/m3.
     The phosphate precipitation was also good,precipitation
was complete (P0<*-psoi = 0,02 ppm) and even with an average
maximum overflow rate as high as 1,6 m/h, the separation of
floes was good, leaving total POit-P = 0,34 ppm and suspended
solids = 13ppm in the effluent.  The effluent was very clear
with secci-depth  of 163 cm.
     As may be seen from table 4 the effluent guality in per-
iod 2 was not so good as in period 1 in either of the treat-
ment lines.Why the concentration of both total and soluble
organic matter went up also in the combined precipitation
line, we don't know.  It is probably however that the extreme
organic loading in period 1 had some impact on the biofilm in
such a way that the high loading resulted in a thick biofilm
that stripped of to a greater extent in period 2 resulting
in a decrease in total active biomass.
     However, since the main objective in period 2 was to com-
pare the two different processes the absolute treatment result
is not so important.
     The effluent quality in the combined precipitation line
was not bad, however, with average COD-values in the effluent
corresponding to BOD5-values of less than 10 BOD5  ,/m3 and
less than 20 g BOD5   /m3.                       S01
     It was obvious,   however, that separation of floes was
worse than in period 1,leaving 27 ppm of suspended solids in
the effluent and the secci-depth had fallen to 85 cm.  Phos-
phate removal was still good.
     When we compare the results from the two treatment lines,
two things are clear:
     - The removal of soluble organic matter was equally good
       in the two lines.
     - Separation of floes was better in the combined precipi-
       tation line.
     The difference between the two processes lies in the floe
separation aspect,as one might expect.  This demonstrates the
usefulness of the flocculation tanks.
     It must be said, however, that the results in the simul-
taneous precipitation line may have been influenced by:
                            1150

-------
     - the fact that the precipitant addition point was chan-
       ged over the period.
     - the fact that the precipitant dosing equipment for this
       line was a provisorium which may have given a dosing
       rate not as reliable as in the other line.
     An other investigation period was actually also performed
in which all water was led through the simultaneous precipita-
tion line giving a relatively high hydraulic load (ave. max
overflow rate 1,2 m/h).  The organic loading in this period
was relatively low and therefore the results are not included
in detail.  The results where very similar to the ones obtai-
ned in period 2.  Towards the end of the hydraulically high
loaded simultaneous precipitation period the sludge separation
was, however, very good (SS < 10 ppm, P(\ - Ptot < 0,3 ppm and

BOD5 tot < 20 ppm).  This proved to us that good treatment may
also be obtained by the simultaneous precipitation process.
     Based on the results  we  would, however, advocate that
flocculation tanks are used with a detention time of 15-20 min.
It is very important that these are constructed so that biofilm
settling is avoided.
     With regard to precipitation addition point it cannot be
stated from this investigation whether this should be done be-
fore or after the RBC-tank with combined precipitation.  Since
only the normal point of addition, after the RBC's was tested
here.  It may be argued however that precipitant addition be-
fore or into the RBC-tank would precipitate some of the solu-
ble organic matter and thus actually reducing the organic load
on the RBC.  The comparison between simultaneous and combined
precipitation did not, however, confirm this, since soluble
COD in the effluent was the same in the two lines.
     It may also be argued that precipitant addition before
the RBC would give less precipitant consumption because the
suspended solids concentration are lower here and consequent-
ly less precipitant would be consumed in coagulating suspended
matter.
     In simultaneous precipitation we feel  therefore that the
most correct precipitant adding point is before the RBC, main-
ly because this is the point where thorough mixing is easiest
to obtain.  In the investigation, we did not see much differ-
ence in the results, for the different dosing points.  But
then we kept the dosage constant.
                          1151.

-------
CONCLUSIONS

1. Combined biological/chemical treatment can be obtained in
   RBC plants by adding precipitant before or into the RBC-
   tank (simultaneous precipitation), after the RBC-tank and
   before a flocculation/sedimentation system (combined preci-
   pitation) or with separate chemical step downstream the RBC-
   settling tank (post-precipitation).
2. The experiences from Norwegian combined precipitation plants
   and from the project reported in this paper,is that excellent
   treatment results may be obtained by combined precipitation.
   Since this process has one sludge separation unit less than
   post-precipitation, combined precipitation is economically
   favourable compared to post-precipitation.
3..Simultaneous precipitation may also give acceptable effluent
   quality» but it  seems that  separation of floes is better in
   a combined precipitation system as a result of better floc-
   culation.
4. Adding precipitant (alum) directly to the RBC-tank in simul-
   taneous precipitation does not give any adverse effect on
   the capability of the biofilm to remove organic matter when
   pH is kept above  pH. = 6,0.
5. Good removal  of both organic matter and phosphate was ob-
   tained with combined precipitation at high organic and hyd-
   raulic loadings.   A design criteria of average organic loa-
   ding < 20 g BOD7  tot/m2  d> average max overflow rate  in
   final  settler < 1,3 m3/m2-h  and 20 min detention time in
   flocculators   seem to be acceptable.   This is a consider-
   ably higher organic loading than can  be accepted when chem-
   ical treatment is not included.
                             1152

-------
   TREATMENT OF DOMESTIC SEWAGE BY AQUATIC RIBBON SYSTEM
     Chun-Teh' Li.   Department of Environmental
     Engineering,  National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan,
     Taiwan

     James S.  Whang. AEPCO, Inc., Rockville, Maryland

     T.N.  Chiang.  Department of Environmental Engineering,
     National  Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
INTRODUCTION
     Fixed-film biological processes have become popular
for treating organic wastewaters during the past decade
because of their low energy, and possibly low manpower
requirements.  There are many types of fixed-film biological
treatment processes including trickling filters; bio-towers,
which are basically trickling filters that use light-weight
plastic media instead of gravel as a substrate; rotating
biological contactors (RBCs); packed-bed reactors (PBRs);
and fluidized-bed reactors (FBRs).  The latter three  types
of fixed-film processes have been successfully implemented
for: (1) removal of soluble BOD  from wastewaters;  (2)
nitrification, and (3) denitrification of various
wastewaters.  These processes generally consist of  a
fixed-film reactor followed by a liquid-solids separation
unit such as a clarifier, a filter, or other  special
liquid-solids separation unit.

     The fixed-film biological processing system reported
in this  study represents a new concept which  combines the
fixed-film reactor and  the liquid-solids  separatdr  into
one physical unit.  In  this new  fixed-film  system  (Aquatic
Bio-Ribbon Treatment  System), specially designed synthetic
ribbons  are  used as a substrate  for microorganisms  in a
                              1153

-------
 reactor  system to achieve removal of 5-day soluble BOD,
 nitrification,  and denitrification.
 SYSTEM  DESCRIPTION AND THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS
     The  aquatic  ribbon reactor  system (Figure 1)  consists
of  a secondary  treatment chamber,  a nitrification  chamber,
and a denitrification  chamber

in  series.   In  the  secondary treatment chamber,  zones  for
distinctly  different unit  processes are maintained.   The
upper zone  is aerated  minimally  just to meet  all oxygen
transfer  requirements.   The  lower  zone, which is designed
to  facilitate sedimentation of sludge particles, is  not
aerated.  Similar to other fixed-film systems,  there is
no  sludge return.   The  dissolved oxygen (D.O.)  level in
the secondary treatment chamber  is  kept above 2.8  mg/1  at
all times by artificial aeration.   Heterotrophic
microorganisms  are  grown on the  ribbon surface.  The
heterotrophs metabolize the organic matter  present in  the
sewage and  available oxygen to achieve the  conversion  of
soluble BOD  to  suspended BOD.  Exess biomass  growth  on  the
ribbon surface  eventually  sloughs  off and  settles  into  the
lower zone of the secondary chamber where  it  is  periodically
removed.

     The  second and the third chambers have an  arrangement
similar to the  first chamber.  Both chambers  are divided
into two  zones: the upper  zone provides the actual
biological treatment process; the lower zone  facilitates
sludge removal.

     The upper  zone of  the second chamber  is  aerated to
encourage growth of autotrophic nitrifying  bacteria
(Nitrosomonas and Nitrobactor) on the  ribbon  surface,
but activated nitrifying sludge is  not  recirculated.
Ammonia-nitrogen present in the wastewater  becomes the
electron donor  in the bio-nitrification process  and  is
oxidized  to nitrite and  eventually  nitrate.   The D.O. level
in the nitrification chamber is maintained  at, or  above,
1.35 mg/1 to promote the necessary  nitrification process.

     The  third  chamber  is  isolated  from the outside
atmosphere to promote anoxic conditions.  This facilitates
                            1154

-------
                                         0)
                                         4-1
                                         CO
                                         O
                                         4-1
                                         O
                                         TO
                                         c
                                         o
                                        .0
                                        f>
                                        •H
                                        PS

                                         O
                                        •H
                                        •U
                                         TO
                                         3
                                         cr
                                         to
                                         CO
                                         Q)
                                         O
                                         O
                                         1-1
                                         60
1155

-------
growth of denitrifying bacteria on  the ribbon  surface  and
thus biological denitrification processes.  Denitrifying
bacteria which include the genera Pseudomonas, Bacillus,
and Achromobactor are responsible for the denitrification
process.  Nitrate- and nitrite- nitrogen under anoxic
conditions become the electron acceptors in the
bio-denitrification process.

     In the denitrification process, the denitrifiers  need
soluble carbon to meet the metabolic requirements.  As  the
denitrification process occurs, the carbon source  in the
wastewater is depleted and becomes a limiting  factor.
Supplemental carbon is always necessary to enable  the
denitrification process to continue.  In this experiment,
carbon was supplemented by adding methanol to  the  inlet
of the denitrification chamber so that the
carbon-to-nitrogen ratio was maintained at, or slightly
above, 1.10.  The empirical methanol feed concentration
or requirement can be computed by the following equation:
  [CH3OH]

    where,
      and
   2.47x[N03-N]
[CH,OH]
[NQ,-N]
[Nof-Nj
[D.6.]
            1.53x[NO -N]
+  0.87x[D.O.]
= methanol cone, in wastewater (mg/1)
= nitrate nitrogen cone, (mg N03-N/1)
- nitrite nitrogen cone, (mg N02~N/1)
= dissolved oxygen cone, (mg/1)
In this study, methanol was manually fed to the third
chamber to satisfy the carbori requirement of the
denitrification process.  A reactor system, which uses part
of the influent-soluble BOD as a carbon source for the third
chamber, is being studied.

     The removal and conversion mechanisms involved in BOD
removal, nitrification, and denitrification in an aquatic
ribbon system are depicted in Figure 2.

     The-sewage used in testing the reactor system was
primarily of domestic origin.  Table 1 summarizes the
composition of the wastewater used in this study.  The
aquatic ribbon system is currently being studied for its
capability to treat tannery wastewater.
                              1156

-------
                                  09
                                  c
                                  o
                                 .o
                                  o
                                 • rJ
                                  JJ
                                  3
                                  o-
                                  c
                                  o

                                  00

                                  O
                                 •H
g
!E


a
                   I
                                  03
                                  O
                                 •H
                                  ao
                                  o
                                 i— i
                                  o
                                 •H
                                 PQ
                                  §
              T3
               
-------
     Table  I.   Characteristics  of Wastewater
   Parameter
                                   Concentration
Temperature
BOD
COD
BOD/COD Ratio
TSS
VSS
Total Nitrogen
Ammonia Nitrogen
Nitrate Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Alkalinity
(as Calcium Carbonate)
7.50
26^ ± ;
100
252
0.37
150
112
29.5
20.0
0.01 -
8.0
174
7. '60
I °c
248 mg/1
560 mg/1
0.45
186 mg/1
140 mg/1
34.0 mg/1
24.0 mg/1
0.05 mg/1
12.0 mg/1
210 mg/1
     The hydraulic detention times in each reactor chamber
were varied by changing influent rate.  The influent rates
tested varied from 7.2 I/day (1.903 gpd) to 21.8 I/day
(5.762 gpd).  These influent rates result in  hydraulic
detention times from 8 to 24 hours in the secondary
treatment process (First Chamber), from 4 to 12 hours in
the nitrification process (Second Chamber), and from 2 to
4 hours in the denitrification process (Third Chamber).
Tables II to IV summarize pertinent experimental conditions,
  Table II.  Experimental Conditions for BOD Removal
Influent   Hydraulic
  Rate     Detention
(I/day)   Time (Hours)
  7.2
 10.8
 14.4
 21.6
24
16
12
8
          	BOD Loading Rate
            SurfaceVolumeD.O.
          (gm/M^day)  (gm/M3-day)  (mg/1)
14.17
13.20
27.43
41.14
248
231
480
720
 2.85
 2.80
"3.20
 3.50
                              1158

-------
  Table III. Experimental Conditions for Nitrification
Influent
Rate (I/day)

     7.2
    10.8
   . 14.4
    21.6
   Hydraulic
 Detention Time
    (Hours)

      12
       8
       6
       4
 Surface Loading     D.O.
  of Ammonia-N      (mg/1)
  (gm/M 2-day)

       1.03    .       1.35
       1.61           1.35
       1.80           1.60
       3.00           1.80
  Table IV. Experimental Conditions for Denitrification
  Influent
    Rate
  (I/day)

    7.2
   10.8
   14.4
   21.6
  Hydraulic
Detention Time
   (Hours)

      6
      4
      3
      2
Surface Loading     D.O.
 of Nitrate-N      (mg/1)
 (mg/M-day)      _____

     1.11           0.15
     1.80           0.15
     1.94           0.10
     2.57           0.40
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
     Experimental results  for  the aquatic ribbon treatment
system  are  summarized  in Table V.  As  shown,  soluble  5-day
BOD removal was 93.5%  at a hydraulic detention time of  24
hours.  The soluble  5-day  BOD  removal  efficiency decreased
with decreasing hydraulic  detention time as evidenced by
only an 85.4% BOD removal-  efficiency when the hydraulic
detention time was reduced to  8 hours.

     As shown in Table V,  nitrification efficiency was  97.6%
at a hydraulic detention time  of  12 hours.  Like BOD  removal
efficiency, nitrification  efficiency also decreased with
decreasing  hydraulic detention time as evidenced by an  86.5%
                             1159

-------
Table V. Results of Treatability Study of Domestic Sewage
Influent
Rate
(I/day)
7.2
10.8
14.4
21.6
BOD
Removal
Nitrification
(%) Rate t d (%)
93
91
88
85
.5
.2
.3
.4
14
13
27
41
.17
.20
.43
.14
24
16
12
8
97.6
94.0
86.0
86.5
Rate
1.00
1.52
1.70
2.58
td
12
8
6
4
Denitrification
(%)
89.7
88.6
87.1
87.3
Rate
1.00
1.59
1.69
2.25
td
6
4
3
2
   Note: Removal rate is expressed in mg/tr -day
         t^ is the hydraulic detention time (hours).
nitrification efficiency when the hydraulic detention time
was reduced to 4 hours.  Nitrification efficiency was
essentially unaffected by the hydraulic detention time,
once the hydraulic detention time exceeded 8 hours.

     As shown in Table V, denitrification efficiency was
89.7% at a hydraulic detention time of 6 hours.
Denitrification efficiency decreased with decreasing
hydraulic detention time as shown by an 87.3%
denitrification efficiency when the hydraulic detention
time was reduced to 2 hours.  It should be noted that
denitrification efficiency is essentially unaffected by
the hydraulic detention time, once the hydraulic detention
time exceeded 2 hours.

     Figure 3 presents the relationship between soluble
BOD removal efficiency and BOD surface loading rate for
a given influent BOD concentration.  Figure 4 presents the
relationship between soluble BOD removal efficiency and
BOD volumetric loading rate for a given influent BOD
concentration.  From these graphs, the following are
concluded:

     •  Soluble BOD removal efficiency increases with
        decreasing BOD surface loading rate or volumetric
        loading rate

     •  Soluble BOD removal efficiency increases with
                              1160

-------
               100  -
                  0246   8   10  12  14

                   »OD SUBFACE LORDING KftTE 
-------
         increasing  influent BOD  concentration  at  a  given
         surface, or volumetric loading  rate, especially
         when  the loading  rates are  relatively  high.

     •   The aquatic ribbon treatment  system  is more
         efficient at higher influent  BOD  concentrations,
         with  an upper  limit not  yet defined.

     The overall system BOD removal efficiency, expressed
as a function of hydraulic detention  time, is  presented
in Figure 5.

     The experimental  results related to  the nitrification
chamber  are presented  in  Figure  6.  Nitification  process
efficiency increases with a decreasing  surface loading  rate
of ammonia-nitrogen.   However, the  actual nitrification
rate (unit mass of ammonia-nitrogen removed  per unit  surface
area and unit time) increases with  an increasing
ammonia-nitrogen loading  rate, and  seemingly reaches  an
assymptotic level.  This  assymptotic  value can not be
clearly  defined, because  it exists beyond the  range of  the
experimental  conditions.

     The experimental  results related to  the denitrification
chamber  are presented  in  Figure  7.  Similar  to the
nitrification process, the denitrification efficiency is
shown to increase with a  decreasing surface  loading rate
of nitrate-nitrogen.   The actual denitrification  rate (unit
mass of  nitrate-nitrogen  removed per  unit surface area  and
unit time) increases with increasing  surface loading  rates
of nitrate-nitrogen.   It  is believed  that there is an
assymptotic value, which  again,  can not be determined
because  it lies beyond the range of the experimental
conditions.

     The nitrification and denitrification efficiencies
as a function of hydraulic detention  time are  presented
in Figures 8  and 9, respectively.  Figures 8 and  9 also
show the actual nitrification and denitrification rates
as a function of hydraulic detention  time.  In brief, the
actual nitrification and  denitrification rates increase
with decreasing hydraulic detention time.  The reaction
efficiency (whether nitrification or  denitrification)
increases with decreasing hydraulic detention  time.
However, the  nitrification efficiency drops sharply when
the hydraulic detention time is  shorter than 4 hours.
                            1162

-------
            100


             95

             90

             65

             80

             75

             70
               0   0.5 1.0  1.5  2.0 2.5 3.0  3.5

               SURFACE LOADING RME (gm HH3-B/M2-day)
Figure 5.  Level of Nitrification Vs.  Surface
            Loading Rate  of Ammonia-Nitrogen
   100
*"
B  95

s  90
S  85
g
S  80

   75

   70
                         -|	r
                                T	T
                I
                0  0.5 1.0 1.5  2.0 2.5 3.0  3.5

                 SUWAO5 LOADIHG SMS
                                             I
                                             s
                                             8.
 Figure 6.   Level  of Denitrification Vs. Surface
             Loading  Rate of  Nitrate-Nitrogen
                        1163

-------
    0  100

    I
    fa
    w   95

    |

    i   90


    o   85
        80

                                      J
          0    7   14   21  28   35   42



          HYDRAULIC DETENTION TIME (Hours)
Figure 7.  Overall BOD Removal Vs.  Detention Time
                      1164

-------
„ 100





B 95




C 90
M



E 85





  80




  75
               g
                 70
                  i



                                           A
                   0   24   6   8  10  12



                   HYDRAULIC CCTEHTIOK TIME (Roues)
Figure 8.  Level of  Nitrification Vs  Detention Time
             g

             8
             a
  85




  80




  75




  70
                  i
                             1   t
  f
  CN



7 f






•f





5I


4 §



3 §

  £

2 $
                  0   1   234   56



                   HYDRAULIC DETISTIOH TUB (Sae»)
 Figure  9.   Level  of Denitrification Vs.  Detention Time
                             1165

-------
      The amount of alkalinity expressed as calcium carbonate
 consumed per mg/1 of ammonia-nitrogen nitrified is presented
 in Figure 10.   The amount of alkalinity generated per mg/1
 of nitrate-nitrogen denitrified is presented in Figure 11.
 The net effect on the system chemistry is that every mg/1
 of nitrogen removed from the wastewater results in an
 approximately 4.2 mg/1 reduction of alkalinity.  For
 domestic sewage, which normally contains 150 to 220 mg/1
'of alkalinity and 15 to 25 mg/1 of ammonia-nitrogen,
 nitrification and denitrification are not limited by
 alkalinity availability.  If alkalinity availability is
 anticipated to be a problem, manual addition of alkalinity
 using lime or calcium carbonate should be considered.

      With regard to supplementary carbon for the
 denitrification process, it was demonstrated that a methanol
 concentration of approximately 46 mg/1 in the wastewater
 before the denitrification chamber was sufficient for
 denitrification to take place at 90% efficiency.

      It is possible to increase the total surface area of
 the aquatic ribbons within each chamber of the reactor
 system to increase the reaction rate, and thus somehow
 proportionally reduce the hydraulic detention time
 required.  The specific surface area values (i.e., ratio
 of total surface area and effective liquid volume for each
 chamber) for the pilot system used in this study are
 summarized in Table VI along with specific surface areas
 reported by other researchers (Ref. 1,2,3) using RBC systems
 for treating domestic or municipal wastewater.  It can be
 seen that the specific surface area used in this study is
 approximately 5 to 15 times less than those reported by
 others.  Therefore, it appears that the total ribbon surface
 area could be increased to considerably increase the system
 capacity and/or reduce the hydraulic detention time
 required.
 COMPARISON WITH OTHER STUDIES
      Because an aquatic ribbon fixed-film treatment process
 is a new concept, no comparable data are available for a
 comparison study.  One can only attemp to make a generic
 comparison study using the data obtained from RBC systems.

      A number of researchers (Ref. 2,4,5,6) have tried to
                             1166

-------
                8
                a
                  140


                  130


                  120


                  110

                  100

                   90
                        7.08 ag/1 Alkalinity Consumed Per
                        ng/1 of NH3-N Nitrified
                     LJ^I	I	I	1	I	I	I	I
                    0   15  16   17   18  19   20   21

                     coHoncnuwiotj OP wi3-n REMOVED (ng/i>
Figure  10.   Consumption of Alkalinity  as a Function of
               NH3-N Nitrified
               _  60

               f
                  50
                  40
                    r*Xn
                        2.9 ag/1 Alkalinity Increase Per
                        •g/1 of NO3-N Denitrified
                    LJSr*	'	>	'	1	1	1	1
                   O   10   12  14   16  18  .30 22

                               OP BOj-B MMOVBD (Kg/1)
Figure  11.   Increase  of Alkalinity  as a  Function  of
               N03-N Denitrified
                                   1167

-------
 Table VI. Comparison of Specific Surface Area of Aquatic
           Ribbon System and Rotating Biological Contactor
           (RBC) Systems
 Reference
This Study
Marsh, et al
Poon, et al
Huang, et al
Secondary
Treatment
 Chamber

 18 1/M
200 1/M
620 1/M
180 1/M
Nitrification
   Chamber

    40 1/M
   200 1/M
   620 1/M
Denitrification
    Chamber

    70 1/M
establish the relationship between soluble 5-day BOD removal
and loading rates.  The most commonly used method  is to
correlate the BOD removal rates with surface loading rates.
These relationships by Poon, et al (Curve A, Ref.  2),
Lagnese (Curve B, Ref. 4), and Reh (Curve C, Ref.  5), along
with the data obtained from this study, are presented in
Figure 12.  It can be seen in Figure 12 that the soluble
5-day BOD removal rates achieved by the aquatic ribbons
system are comparable with RBC systems.

     In a nitrification study using a 4-stage RBC  system,
Marsh et al (Ref. 1) suggested an empirical equation to
describe effuent ammonia-nitrogen concentration as a
function of influent flow rate, influent ammonia-nitrogen
concentration, influent total 5-day BOD concentration, total
media surface area available, and wastewater temperature.
The equation is:
                K
                          [ AxT ]
    where, No - Influent ammonia-nitrogen cone,  (mg NH3~N/1)
           Ne - Effluent ammonia-nitrogen cone,  (mg NH3~N/1)
           Q  = Volumetric flow rate, (cubic meter/sec)
           S0 = Influent total 5-day BOD cone, (mg/1)
           A  = Total media surface area, (square meter)
           T  = Wastewater temperature, (degree  Centigrade)
      and  K  =  empirical constant
                             1168

-------
                                           C8
                                           PS

                                           M
                                           C
                                           •r-l
                                           "O
                                           tfl
                                           o
                                           •J

                                           01
                                           o
                                           CO
                    ol
                    -  3.
                                           S
                                           CO
                                           0)
 O

 I
ffi

 u-i
O
O
cc
                                           o
                                           03
                                           C
                                           0)
                                           4-)
                                           V
                                           .£>

                                           CX
                                           •H
                                           J=
                                           to
                                           C
                                           o
                                           •H
                                           4J
                                           CO

                                           "oi
                                           cr!
                                           0)
                                           M
1169

-------
     According to the above empirical equation, the data
obtained from this study and data obtained by Marsh, et
al (Ref. 1) were plotted and are presented in Figure 13.
Figure 13 indicates that the aquatic ribbon systems provide
a level of performance similar to RBC systems with
approximately the same slope of K = 15,280.

     Poon, et al (Ref. 7), in a nitrification study using
a 4-stage RBG system, suggested that the unit
ammonia-nitrogen removal rates and surface loading rates
are best-fit by a logistic-S curve, expressed by the
following equation:
          R
where,
  and
                       R
                        max
                     1 + m-e
                            b-L
             Rmax = Maximum unit surface nitrification rate
             R    = Unit nitrification rate
             m    = Coefficient
             b    = Coefficient
             L    = Surface loading rate of ammonia-nitrogen
 Table VII.  Comparison of Rmax, b, and m Values for
             the Nitrification Process with Other Study
   Parameter

  Temperature
      Rmax
       m
       b

      Note:
           This Study
            at 26°C

              26°C
              3.08
              7.80
             -1.23
This Study
 Adjusted
 to 11°C
   1.37
   7.80
  -2.76
Poon, et al ,
  at 11°C
    1.54
   10.28
   -2.87
        Rmax  is  expressed  in  gm/M^-day.
        m is  a dimensionless  constant.
        b is  expressed  in  M^-day/gm.
     Using this logistic-S curve fitting technique, the
Rmax» ™» an<* b values for wastewater temperature at
approximately 26 degree centigrade and temperature-adjusted
                              1170

-------
                                      O
                                      4-1
                                      O
                                      tB
£2
I I
O s
                   -00
                                      60
                                      e
                                      •H
                                      T3
                                      cd
                                      o
                                       3
                                       co
                                       C
                                       O
                                      4-1
                                       C
                                       
-------
      m, and b values from the data obtained  from this  study
are presented in Table VII.  Values reported  by Poon, et
al are also listed in Table VII.  From Table  VII, it can
be seen that the aquatic ribbon fixed-film treatment process
is similar to RBC systems in level of treatment performance,
and can be predicted fairly accurately by the logistic-S
curve as suggested for RBC systems.
CONCLUSIONS
     The aquatic-ribbon fixed-film biological treatment
process discussed in this paper is a newly developed
treatment technology, which is capable of achieving removal
of soluble BOD, nitrification, and denitrification from
domestic or municpal wastewaters at a level  similar to
conventional rotating biological contactors  (RBCs).  Under
the experimental conditions in this study, the pilot aquatic
ribbon treatment system was capable of removing more than
91% of the total 5-day BOD at a hydraulic detention of 16
hours; providing 94% nitrification at a hydraulic detention
time of 8 hours; and achieving 87% denitrification at a
hydraulic detention time of 2 hours.

     The combination of the liquid-solids separation process
with the aquatic ribbon reactor into one physical unit is
a unique feature of the aquatic ribbon fixed-film biological
treatment system.  This feature effectively  eliminates the
need for a separate clarifier and thus should result in
a cost-savings for aquatic-ribbon systems compared to
conventional RBC systems.  Because the liquid-solids
separation zones in the secondary treatment  and
nitrification chambers are connected to the  upper reaction
zones, aerobic conditions can be maintained  at all times.
This reduces the potential of rising sludge  and bulking
problems which are commonly encountered, when septic
conditions occur in the bottom sludge of a conventional
clarifier.
     There are areas for further improvements to the aquatic
ribbon treatment  system.  The pilot  system used in  this
study has an effecive specific surface area of approximately
5 to 15 times less than typical values for conventional
RBC systems.  Consequently, there appears to te a great
potential for aquatic ribbon systems  to achieve a level
                             1172

-------
of performance equal to or better than conventional RBC
systems cost-effectively.

     Aquatic ribbon biological treatment systems are a
low-technology, low-energy alternative to other conventional
treatment technologies.  Aquatic-ribbon systems can be
easily incorporated into existing lagoons and activated
sludge treatment plants without significant process
modifications to improve levels of treatment and reduce
energy consumption.
                               1173

-------
REFERENCES
1. Marsh, D. , et al., "Coupled Trickling Filter - Rotating
   Biological Contactor Nitrification Process", Jour, of
   Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 53, No. 10,
   pp. 1469-1480, October, 1981

2. Poon, C.P.C,, H.K. Chin, E.D. Smith, and W.J. Mikucki,
   "Upgrading with Rotating Biological Contactors for BOD
   Removal", Jour, of Water Pollution Control Federation,
   Vol. 53, No. 4, pp.474-481, April, 1981

3. Huang, J.C., and V.T. Bates, "Comparative Performance
   of Rotating Biological Contactors Using Air and Pure
   Oxygen", Jour, of Water Pollution Control Federation,
   Vol. 52, No. 11, pp. 2686-2703, November, 1980

4. Lagnese, J.F., "Evaluation of RBC Used to Upgrade
   Municipal Plant to Secondary Standards", Paper presented
   at the Technical Conference, Water Pollution Control
   Association of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
   April, 1978

5. Reh, C.W., et al., "An Approach to Design of RBCs for
   Treatment of Municipal Wastewater", Paper presented at
   the ASCE National Environmental Engineering Conference,
   Nashville, Tenn., July, 1977

6. Hao, 0., and G.F. Hendricks, "Rotating Biological
   Reactors Remove Nitrients", Water & Sewage Works, 121,
   Parts I and II, 44, November-December, 1974

7. Poon, C.P.C., H.K. Chin, E.D. Smith, and W.J. Mikucki,
   "Upgrading with Rotating Biological Contactors for
   Ammonia Nitrogen Removal", Jour.of Water Pollution
   Control Federation, Vol. 53, No.  7, pp. 1158-1165,
   July, 1981
                             -1174

-------
              ACTIVATED FIXED FILM BIOSYSTEMS
                 IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT
     John W. Smith.  Professor.  Memphis State University,
     Memphis, Tennessee.

     Hraj A. Khararjian.  Professor.  University of
     Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia,
I.  OVERVIEW
                              i
     Historically, waste containing organic materials have
been subjected to biological treatment processes to reduce
the impact of the waste on receiving environment.  The most ...
widely used concept in urban areas has been the activated
sludge process, a fluid bed system.  With waste of increasing.
complexity from municipalities due to industrial influxes
and changing life styles, the basic.biological waste treat- .
ment process has been severely stressed in many locations to
perform satisfactorily.  The activated sludge system was
encouraged in the 1970s due to its efficiency of BOD removal
as compared to the fixed film biological reactors, i.e.,
trickling filters.  The future of new construction of
activated sludge systems or wastewater treatment in general
is clouded due to the de-emphasis by the present administra-
tion in Washington.  While the need for environmental
improvement and management remains, federal funds for the
construction have been severely eliminated.  New systems will
have to be justified on .the basis of savings or on the basis
of least cost to the municipality. -With the emphasis on
local financing of wastewater systems, and the need for
stable operation due to shock loading and variable levels of
                              1175

-------
of toxic materials, the fixed film biological system again
appears to have certain advantages over the activated sludge
process.
     The traditional fixed film reactor has been the
"trickling filter" with either a stone or plastic media.
These units were originally installed due to their simplicity
of operation and, their low energy requirements.  Their
limited removal efficiency and susceptibility to shock load-
ing were accepted as trade-offs for their advantages.  The
introduction of the synthetic or plastic medium greatly
improved the efficiency of operation of the trickling
filter but at the sacrifice of more sophisticated operation
and more energy input.  Directionally, advances xrere made in
fixed film reactors with the development of rotating
biological contactors to provide a low energy input system
but also a system which has improved operational
characteristics.  As indicated by Benjes (1), the
manufacturers of rotating biological disks claim that the
system offers the following advantages as compared to
conventional fluid bed systems.
     1.  Simpler operations
     2.  Capability of meeting a 10/10 effluent standard
         without subsequent treatment
     3.  Final clarifier under flow concentration from
         2 to 3 percent
     4.  Lower energy requirements per pound BOD removed
The standard rotating disk operation is a once through flow
process with no recycling involved.  Obviously, this
presents a significant operational advantage ov-»r other
processes.  The capability of the biological 5;;. 3tem to meet
oxygen demand requirements in the first stages of the
process has been questioned.  Zero dissolved oxygen will
probably occur and potential odors will result.  The claim
of achieving medium and low effluent standards without
additional treatment is probably true only of lightly loaded
systems.  Excellent quality has been shown to be achievable
of operating plants; however, the ability of the system to
reach extremely low levels of effluent BOD and suspended
solids is questionable.  The final underflow concentration
does reach the 2 to 3 percent level which offers an
advantage in the sludge handling facilities.  The primary
advantage claimed for the system is the lower power require-
ment.  Although this is probably true, based upon pilot
plant and operating studies, for reasonable effluent
criteria (30/30), this does not appear to be a valid claim
                              1176

-------
as  the  effluent  concentrations become lower.  The power
requirements appear  to approach those for activated sludge
systems as  these lower effluent concentrations are required.
     A  second  type of fixed film  system has also been
advocated" by certain manufacturers and engineers as a
competitor  for the conventional activated sludge system.  As
described by Richter (2),  the activated bio filter (ABF)
system  is actually a combination  of a. fixed film reactor and
a fluid bed system.  Biological solids which have been
clarified from the fluid bed system, are recycled back tp the
top of  a  fixed film  reactor and allowed to floxtf through the
reactor into the fluid bed unit.  This combination of
reactors  has been utilized in potato processing,waste in
Idaho with  very  satisfactory results.  The combination of
the two processes is reported to  provide a very stable system
when receiving highly variable influent loads and to
provide a very rapidly settling biological floe.  Benjes (1)
also evaluated the ABF system as  a competitor to the
traditional activated sludge unit.  Although this analysis
(1)  was not based upon any one location or operation, the
same general advantages were discussed, i.e., for reliable
operation under  varying  loads, lower capital and operating .
costs,  and  simpler operation.  It was suggested that each of
the claims  had to be evaluated on a site specific basis
and should  not be accepted as generalizations.
     Research  performed  at Memphis State University over the
past several years has advanced the information available
for both  rotating biological contactors and the ABF process
with not  only  city of Memphis municipal wastewater but also
synthetic wastewater utilizing glucose substrate.  The
results of  the MSU investigations will be presented in the
following paragraphs for both pilot plant field studies and
laboratory  studies.  Under a research grant from the city of
Memphis,  Division Public Works, pilot plant studies were
Conducted over a one-year  period  at the T.E. Maxson waste-
water facility in Memphis. Comparable results were obtained
on  an ABF system, a  trickling filter utilizing plastic media,
'and a conventional contact stabilization activated sludge
systems.  A cost effective analysis of the proposed
expansion of the T.E. Maxson facility prepared by Black and
Vetch engineering consultants in  Kansas City, Missouri,
indicated that not only would the ABF system present a lower
capital cost alternative but would also be less energy
intensive and  actually reduce the energy consumption of the
existing  plant.   The laboratory studies utilizing rotating.
                               1177

-------
contactors constructed of wood followed by a fluid bed
aeration system have indicated that the process can be
operated at high F/M ratios with reasonably consistent
performance.  The activated RBC system has also been shown
to be resistant to toxic loads through the development of a
balanced eco system to degrade resistant pesticides.

II.  ABF PILOT STUDIES

     The ABF pilot plant, as shown in Figure 1, received
wastewater from the aerated grit chamber of the T.E. Maxson
wastewater treatment plant.  The degrited wastewater passed
through a circular primary clarification basin then into a
mixing sump where the clarified effluent was mixed with
return sludge from the secondary clarifier and bottoms from
the biotower and pumped to the top of the biotower itself.
From the biotower, a portion of the flow which was not
recirculated was transferred to a short term complete mixed
aeration basin and then through a secondary clarifer where
the biomass was separated and either recycled or wasted to
an aerobic digestor.  A similar unit was operated at the
city of Memphis North Wastewater Treatment Plant.  The
biofilter was obtained from the Neptune Microfloc Company on
a loan basis for the pilot plant evaluation.  The filter, a
24-foot high, 4-foot square unit, contained 21 feet of
horizontal wood medium consisting of wooden slats on one-
inch horizontal spacing with flights arranged every six inches.
The operation in the biotower was controlled by the organic
loading (pounds of BOD per cubic foot of medium) as well as
hydraulic loading (gallons per square foot of medium).  The
effluent from the biotower contained high concentrations of
biological solids, both those entering the tower and those
which had fallen from the horizontal wooden medium.  The
aeration basin was also provided by Neptune Microfloc and
was considered as an integral part of the fixed film treatment
concept.  The flow from the biotower was subjected to an
aeration period of approximately two to four hours in order
to stablize the biological solids and allow for any
additional removal of soluble BOD.  Air was supplied to the
system from the main air supply of the treatment plant
through diffusers (coarse bubble) located in the bottom of
the aeration basin.  The effluent from the aeration basin was
clarified in a seven-foot diameter secondary clarifer.  This
unit was not adequate for the flows placed through the
system as indicated by the surface over flow rate exceeding
                               1178

-------
             DEGRITTED
             INFLUENT
                           PRIMARY
                           SLUDGE
WASTE
PUMP
                        PRIMARY
                        CLARI-
                        FIER
                             AEROBIC
                             DIGESTOR
MOYNO
PUMP
          o^
         £=1
                                               AIR
                        Figure 1


                 ABF PILOT PLANT LAYOUT
                       1179

-------
1700 gallons per day per square foot at times.   The higher
than reasonable overflow rates caused the lower quality
effluent than would have been realized through  an adequately
designed and sized clarifier.
     The operational theory of the ABF system is relatively
simple but yet not normally experienced in waste treatment
systems.  By recycling the underflow from the secondary
clarifier to the top of the biotower, a high microbial
solids level is achieved within the tower itself.  The ABF
system utilizes a wooden horizontal medium as opposed to a
plastic medium.  The horizontal medium not only allows the
microbial solids growing on the media to remain active
longer because of the moisture content of the wood medium,
but also provides finer droplet formation within the tower
due to the flow pattern around the horizontal wooden boards.
The flow rate through the system was initially  set at 1.5
gallons per minute per square foot wetting rate on the
tower.  This proved to be an unstable operation condition due
to uneven sloughing of solids from the tower.  The unit was
operated slightly over three weeks in this mode and then
the wetting rate increased to 2 gallons per minute per
square foot at which point a uniform, constant  sloughing
rate was achieved.  At this wetting rate the raw wastewater
flow into the tower was  16 gallons per minute with a recycle
of return activated sludge of 7 gallons per minute and a
recycle from the tower of 9  gallons per minute providing the
2 gallon per minute per  square foot wetting rate.  Hourly
grab samples and 24 hour 'composite samples were utilized to
evaluate the performance of  the system.  The evaluation
parameter in the biotower was the  loading  in terms of pounds
of BOD per  1000 cubic  feet.  It is believed that the fixed
film reactor  (ABF  tower) operated  as both  an absorption
medium  for  collodial  solids  and colloidal  BOD  and as a
biological  oxidation  region  due to the high surface area  to
which the wastewater  is  exposed.   The  aeration basin is
utilized to allow  time for microbial stabilization of the
remaining BOD  coming  from  the bottom of  the biotower.  The
dissolved oxygen  level and  detention time  in the aeration
basin were  varied  in  this  study to evaluate the  minimum and
maximum values which  could  be  utilized.  Also,  the  loading
rate across the system in  terms of a system food to micro-
 organism ratio was observed and correlated with percent
 removal as  will be discussed in later  paragraphs.  The
 concept of  a system F/M ratio  is  a valid one for this  type
 of a biological system.
                               1180

-------
                   Although the influent was highly variable in BOD and
              suspended solids, an equalization basin was not provided
              ahead of the ABF tower.  The reason for this exclusion'was to
              provide a severe evaluation or test of the ABF unit by'itself
              to equalize load fluctuations or conversely to absorb shock
              loads.  The assumption was that if the system performed
              adequately without an equalization basin, it would present
              many advantages to the city of Memphis or others who were
              investigating this type of unit as a retro-fit to an
              existing plant.
                   Beginning in March and April, a B.F. Goodrich plastic
              media filter was replaced with the ABF tower supplied by the
              Neptune Microfloc Corporation of Coirvallis, Oregon,
              containing horizontal wood media.  The operational mode was
              changed because of the nature of the ABF system.  Because the
              biotower was operated at a relatively constant hydraulic
              loading, wide fluctuations in the organic loading in terms of
              pounds per thousand cubic -. foot per day of BOD were
              experienced.  The biotower, because it contained a high
              population of biological solids on horizontal medium, was
              also monitored for parameters related to a normal aeration
              system, i.e., oxygen uptake rates and sludge volume indices.
              The biotower performed extremely well and much better than
              was originally anticipated when it was installed.  As shown
              in Figure 2, the organic loading varied from a high of
              452 pounds per day per thousand cubic feet to a low of less
              than 110 pounds per day per thousand cubic feet.  Even with
              this wide fluctuation in loading, the biotower removed a  ,
              consistent level of soluble BOD.  The biotower functions very
              similarly to the high rate plastic media filter in the sense
              that a significant soluble BOD removal is anticipated.  The
              effluent from the biotower contains high levels of active
              biological solids which render a total BOD analysis not
              applicable.  The oxygen uptake rates at the bottom of the
              biotower were relatively high when compared to the pilot plant
              complete mix aeration basin following the biotower (see
              Figure 3).  The solids settled reasonably well as indicated
              by the sludge volume index values.  Several studies were
              performed by taking hourly samples of the influent and
              effluent from the biotower to evaluate the ability of the
              biotower to absorb shock organic loadings.  These studies are
              summarized in Table 1.  As can be seen by analysis of the
              data in this table, the soluble removal across the tower was
              generally greater than 80% and often times reached as high
              as 97%.
_
                                            1181

-------
:XA! -"•
'QLZ
'
-------

'09S

i i
'OZ£ "082

'OTiZ '002
W3/3W) .3103 3>IOidT

'091
! N33AX0 3

"021
IJI33dS

i i i
*08 "OTi
1183

-------
                                TABLE  1

                         Bio-tower Evaluation

                          Soluble BOD Removal
                              Soluble BOD
Sample #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Influent
270
294
274
276
270
279
363
330
310
315
282
Bio-Tower Eff.
68
42
59
90
45
42
50
51
40
9
24
% Rem.
75
86
79
69
83
85
86
85
87
V /
97
J 1
92
Note:
Flow conditions were 14 gpm primary effluent, 10 gpm bio-tower
recycle, and 7 gpm return sludge.
                               TABLE 2

                       Effect  of Aeration Time
                       on Soluble BOD Removal
     Elapsed
       Time
    (hours)

       0
       1
       2
       3
       4
       5
       6
       7
       8
                       10-17-79
                     Soluble BOD
                      Remaining
                          98
                          24
                          16
                           8
                           9
                           5
                          13
  10-2-79
Soluble BOD
 Remaining
     11
      1
      6
      1
      1
      3
      5
      5
      5
                             1184

-------
     The amount of aeration which was required to stabilize
the underflow from the biotower was an unknown entity.  A
laboratory study was performed with the flow from the tower
bottom to determine the optimum aeration time.  This study
was performed by pulling samples of the biotower bottom flow,
aerating it for a prolonged period of time while pulling
samples :of the mixed liquor at various time increments.
Analyses of laboratory and field studies indicated that an
aeration time of less than four hours and probably less than
three hours would be adequate to remove most of the
carbonaceous BOD (see Table 2).  As shown by an analysis of
the data in Figure 4, the aeration basin was operated at
varying mixed liquor suspended solids levels with the mean
cell residence time at or about 4% to 5 days.  The mean cell
residence time was calculated based on the amount of mixed
liquor solids in the aeration basin.  An alternate procedure
using total solids inventory in the system was not utilized.
The F/M level was an arbitrary point as far as the study
was concerned but it tended to provide an indication of the
stability of the system.  The oxygen uptake rate in the
aeration basin was relatively low (around 40 mg/1 per hour)
and stable even with a highly variable uptake ratio in the
tower bottom (see Figure 3).  The low oxygen uptake rate was
an indication of the low level of soluble BOD entering the
system.  With the ABF process, it is almost inappropriate to
speak of the biotower without speaking of the activated
sludge portion.  Using a systems analysis approach where the
system considers the total load of the biotower as the food
and the microorganisms in the aeration basin ,as the amount
of microbes, a range of system F/M between  .3 to greater than
2 was observed.  The total system performance was found to
be less influenced by the loading on the biotower in terms of
pounds per day per thousand cubic feet than on the detention
time in the aeration basin.
     Based on an assumed 80% removal of soluble BOD across
the biotower, the soluble loading onto the aeration basin in
terms of pounds per thousand foot of aeration volume per day
became relat ;.vely low.  The aeration time proved to be a
critical factor in the level of BOD in the effluent.  It
is normally recognized that the operation of a system is
satisfactory when the soluble BOD level is consistently less
than 10 mg/1 in the effluent.  The total BOD in the effluent
of the aeration basin was at or above 30 mg/1 for most of the
test, period.  It was determined toward the end of the test
program that nitrification was occurring in the effluent
                             1185

-------
*os
:,n
                           *se
                           *oe
                           -52
                           '02
                                                       -51
                                                                       -or
'OS!
'SEI
'021
'SOI
                             '06
                                               -   --


                                              Si      "09

                                                  N39JLXO
                                                    'OS
                                                                              •st
OOOn
'009E    '0025
                "0082
                'OOTiZ    '0002    "0091
                X H/3H) SS1M NOIJ.b»a3b
                                 '0021
                                                                              •QOh
 •oi
           'L
          '9
                                      i         i
                                      'S        '
                                      DH  3-oanis
                                          1186

-------
samples and steps were taken to alter laboratory procedures
to compensate for the nitrogenous BOD.  When this
compensation was made, the pilot plant unit achieved the
desired effluent quality of less than 30 mg/1 BOD and
suspended solids.

III.  LABORATORY ARBC STUDIES

     To advance further the observations made with the ABF
system, a laboratory fixed film unit was developed as shown
in Figure 5.  Using wooden dowels for the support media, the
.rotating contactors were exposed to a mixture of wastewater
and underflow solids from the secondary clarifier.  Normal
treatment parameters (BOD, COD, SS) were measured on the
influent and effluent of the system.  Mixed liquor suspended
solids x\rere also determined for each wheel and the aeration
basin.  Influent to the North Treatment Plant as well as a
synthetic wastewater using glucose as a carbon source were
used in the laboratory studies.  Shock load conditions
(organic and pesticides) were evaluated as well as normal
operating conditions.  The pesticide shock load condition was
evaluated since the North Treatment Plant frequently receives
variable amounts of pesticide type compounds from one
industry.
     The results obtained to this point are preliminary in
nature; however, they do tend to confirm several aspects of
the field studies.  Detail comparisons are difficult to make
at this time due to the different waste materials and
difference in size of units.  Directionally, the laboratory
studies tend to confirm the following observations made in the
field studies.
     1.  Oxygen uptake rate.  The oxygen uptake rate in the
         aeration basin in both studies was below 50 mg/l/hr.
         Analysis of data from respirometor studies
         performed with biofilm removed from the aeration
         basin and the wheels indicated a stabilization
         phenomenon as opposed to a rapid growth condition of
         a fluid bed system.  This substantially lower uptake
         rate represents a significant savings in operational
         costs over a fluid bed system.  Supplemental
         aeration in the first contactor was necessary in the
         laboratory unit to prevent anaerobic conditions
         from developing on the first contactor.  The
         recycling of high concentrations of settled MLSS
         resulted in a  high uptake in the first contactor.
                               1187

-------
                           Figure 5



                      ACTIVATED ROTATING

                 BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR SCHEMATIC
                     RECYCLED SLUDGE
(INFLUENT
^
ft*


CON-
TACT
WHEEL
NO 1
CON-
TACT
WHEEL
NO 2
CON-
TACT
WHEEL
NO 3


— ^

                                                             EFFLUEN1
              \
         10°


     /   "X^

    9     /\ l/4" DOWLS ON 1/2" CENTERS



   '    P'
  Q   '
  l   P

//
/  /
                       1188

-------
     2.  Stability Under Variable Loads.  Using the synthetic
         feed, the organic load on the system was varied to
         produce a F/M ratio of 0.2 up to 5.0 based on COD
         into the system and MLSS in the aeration basin.  The
         system consistantly achieved better than a 90%
         organic removal with F/M ratios greater than 0.8
         while at lower ratios, the effluent deteriorated
         markedly as shown in Figure 6.
     3.  Resistance to toxic loads.  During the field studies,
         the Maxson plant and the ABF pilot plant both
         received a shock load of a phosphate based
         pesticide.  The, fluid bed system exhibited a decrease
         in performance efficiency as was expected; however,
         the performance of the pilot plant was not affected.
 -:        To evaluate further this phenomena under controlled
         conditions, a series of shock load studies using
         chloro-carbon intermediates from the manufacture of
         endrin was performed with the laboratory (3).  Not
         only were the pesticide-type compounds absorbed onto
         the biofilm and thus removed from the liquid phase
         but biodegradation took place due to the hetrogenous
         growth in the biofilm.  Two destinctly different
         gram negative bacilli and various yeasts were
         identified through enrichment culture studies using
         the chloro-carbon compounds as the sole carbon
         source.  Neither pure cultures isolated from the
         primary enrichment media nor various reconstituted
         mixed cultures would use the chlorinated carbon
         compounds as a carbon source.  However, four      :
         successive transfers of mixed cultures from the
         primary enrichment media resulted in heavy growth
         and chlorinated compound breakdown.

IV.  SUMMARY

     The results to date, both laboratory and field pilot
plant, indicate that the activated biological contactor (ABC)
concept offers several advantages over fluid bed systems in
wastewater treatment.  Considerable energy savings appear
possible due to the lower oxygen uptake rate of the biomass.
Although the oxygen uptake rate of the ABF tower bottoms was
relatively high (^200 mg/l/hr.), the rate in the aeration
basin following the tower was less than 50 mgl/hr.  All of
the reactors (contactors and aeration basin) in the
laboratory study exhibit uptake rates less than 50 mg/l/hr.
                              1189

-------
                                                    - O
                                                          Q
                                                          O
                                                          CJ
                                                          0)
C/2
VD
 60
                                                            CO
00
                                  VD
         %  •JBAOUI3H  QOD
     1190

-------
The hetrogenous biomass developed in the ABC system provides
significant operational stability to shock loads of organic or
toxic orgin.  Several chlorinated compounds normally considered
nonbiogradable and somexvhat toxic xvere assimilated by the
biofilm in the laboratory unit.  Similar results were observed
with a phosphate based pesticide shock load on the pilot plant
system.
     Work is presently continuing of Memphis State University
to define further the mechanisms involved in the ABC.
Additional data will be developed to explore the application
of a mass transfer model to the system similar to that
evaluated by Famularo (4).

REFERENCES

1.  Benjes, EL, "Evaluation of Biological Wastewater Treat-
    ment Process," Waste Water Treatment and Reuse Seminar,
    South Lake Tahoe, California, 1976.

2.  Richter, G. A. and Guthrie, M. D., "ADF/Activated Sludge
    Process Control," 42nd Pacific Northwest Pollution
    Control Federation,  1975.

3.  Redfield, J.; Smith, J. W.; Khararjian, H.; and Peterson,
    G., "Pesticide Addition to Wastewaters Treated in Pilot
    Activated Sludge, Activated Carbon, and Wood Rotating
    Biological Contactor  (RBC) Systems," Submitted to
    Developments  in Industrial Microbiology, 1981.

4.  Famuloro, J.; Mueller, J. A.; and Mulligan, T.: "Appli-
    cation  of Mass Transfer to Rotating Biological Contactors,"
    JWPCF 50, 653, 1978.
                               1191

-------
           COMPARISON OF FIXED-FILM REACTORS WITH A
               MODIFIED SLUDGE BLANKET REACTOR
     Andre* Bachmann, Virginia L. Beard, and Perry L. McCarty,
     Department  of  Civil  Engineering, Stanford  University,
     Stanford, California 94305
INTRODUCTION

     Over the last one hundred years, the anaerobic treatment
process has been  developed beginning with "Moura's Automatic
Scavenger" and progressing to the conventional complete mixed
and  fixed-film anaerobic  reactors  (1).   The  conventional
process is generally  used  for treatment of municipal sludges
and other concentrated wastes.  The advantage of this process
is its simplicity in  design and operation.  The disadvantages
are  that  a  long  hydraulic  detention  time  is  required  for
process efficiency and  that  reduced effluent quality results
from  a high  concentration of  suspended solids unless  some
means of effluent  solids separation is provided.
     To avoid some of these potential problems, the anaerobic
contact  process  has  been   developed  (2)   where  effluent
suspended  solids   are  settled  and  recycled  back  into  the
reactor.   This leads to  a longer  solids  retention  time  and
therefore permits a  significant volume reduction for a given
treatment efficiency.
     To be  able to  treat  relatively  dilute  organic wastes,
care must be  taken to obtain a sufficiently long microorgan-
ism retention  time  within the  system.   Several alternatives
have been  proposed,  such as  the  "anaerobic  filter"  by Young
and McCarty  (3),  the "anaerobic  attached-film expanded bed"
                                1192

-------
reactor by  Switzenbaum  and Jewell (4), the "upflow anaerobic
sludge blanket"  reactor by Lettinga  (5),  and the "anaerobic
rotating biological disc" reactor.
     Excellent results have been achieved with the "anaerobic
filter" in  laboratory  investigations  (3,6-7).  The advantage
of  the  system  is,  its  high  reliability  combined with  high
loading  capacity  and  efficiency. '   However,  the  reactor
requires filling  material which  influences  the  economics of
the process.   Furthermore, clogging  problems may arise with
the filter  which  can  influence  its reliability if run over a
long period of time.                                      >
     The "anaerobic  attached-film expanded  bed"  reactor has
the advantage  of being  relatively free of  clogging,  as the
waste passes in an upward  direction through a bed of suspend-
ed  media   to  which  the  bacteria  attach.    However,  the
disadvantage is  the rate  of  recycling generally  required to
keep the media in suspension.
     The  "upflow  anaerobic  sludge   blanket" reactor   is  a
modified version  of the  contact  process  and is  based  on an
upward  movement   of  the  waste   through  a  dense  blanket  of
anaerobic  sludge.   This  provides  a  greater surface  area
between  the gas  and  the  liquid which  is  advantageous  in
keeping  the   floating  solids    from   clogging   gas   ports.
Nevertheless,  a   large  risk  with   this   reactor   is  the
possibility of  further bed  expansion and excessive  loss of
microorganisms to  the  effluent.   The  sludge blanket  process
also requires special  granular  sludge, which is difficult to
develop.
     The  "anaerobic  rotating  disc"  reactor  has also  been
proposed for anaerobic  treatment of  wastewater (8).   In this
study, it proved  to be a reliable and  stable operating react-
or with  little potential  for clogging while providing a high
void volume.  Its major disadvantage is high  capital cost due
to its relatively complicated construction.
     Perhaps the  major  obstacles to  wider application of the
anaerobic  process  for  industrial  waste  treatment  are the
relative difficulty in  .operation and  the  absence  of a simple
and cost-effective design.
     The objective  of  this paper is  to present a  new process
termed  the  "anaerobic  baffled  reactor"  which is  simple in
form and may offer an economical  solution -to  the treatment of
intermediate   and   low   strength   industrial   wastewater.
Furthermore, a unified model  for  the mathematical description
of  fixed-film  reactors and  sludge blanket  reactors  will be
presented.
                              1193

-------
BAFFLED REACTOR CONCEPT

     The  baffled  reactor   (BR)  for  anaerobic treatment  is
essentially a  series  of upflow  sludge  blanket reactors,  but
because of its unique characteristics, it requires no .special
granular  growth  of  bacteria which  is  difficult  to  obtain.
The baffled reactor's  construction allows a high void volume
and,  therefore,   clogging  problems  are  essentially  elimi-
nated.  A schematic diagram of  an anaerobic baffled reactor
is  shown  in  Figure 1.   This  process  evolved  from  initial
studies with an  "anaerobic  rotating biological disc" reactor
from  which  it was  found that no  rotation of  the discs  was
necessary to obtain reliable reactor performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reactors.    A  comparison was made  between the performance of
three  laboratory-scale  anaerobic  reactors:    the anaerobic
filter, the rotating  biological contactor,  and  the  baffled
reactor.  All  reactors were constructed from plexiglas.  The
anaerobic baffled  reactor  (Figure  1) was  19.3  cm in length
and had a total volume of 1040 cm  and an effective volume of
680 cm^.   The liquid  passed horizontally and around baffles
which  served  to maintain  micoorganisms  within  the reactor.
Sample  ports   were  placed  at   2.5  cm  intervals  along  the
reactor with  an  additional tap  near  the  effluent  port.   The
baffled  reactor  effluent  was  passed   through  an  inverted
siphon  to separate  the  gas from  the  liquid.   A low speed
peristaltic  pump  fed  the  reactor.   After  the   comparitive
reactor evaluation,  the  anaerobic  baffled reactor  was scaled-
up  to  a  6.3  liter  liquid  volume  (Figure  2).    Several
modifications  were  made.       The   downflow chambers  were
narrowed, thus widening  the  upflow chambers where  most of the
cell  mass had  been found to collect.  The lower edges of the
baffles were  slanted to route the  flow  to  the center of the
upflow  chamber   to  achieve  greater  mixing  of  feed  and
solids.   The  number  of ports  was  increased  to  facilitate
sampling and wasting of  solids should clogging occur.
      The  anaerobic filter  (Figure 3) consisted of  a  bed of
stones  with  average  diameter  of  12 mm through  which  the
liquor  was  passed continuously  in an upward direction.  The
filter  had  a  porosity  of 0.42  and  a  liquid void volume of 400
ml.
      The  anaerobic rotating biological  contactor  (Figure 4)
consisted of  circular plates  connected  to  a slowly rotating
horizontal  shaft.   Organisms attached to the surfaces of the
                               1194

-------
                                      a;
                                      t-i
                                      en
                                      >•
                                      co

                                      i-i
                                      o
                                      •u
                                      o
                                      «fl
                                      a)
                                      OS
                                      PO
                                      o
                                     •1-1
                                      0)
                                      cd
                                      CB
                                      !J

                                      bC

                                      «
                                     •H
                                      03


                                      0)


                                      O
                                      CO
                                      s
                                      • H
1195

-------
                          CO
                          60
                          • H
                          ft,
1196

-------
            FEED
            BOTTLE
      PERISTALTIC
        PUMP
                                       INVERTED,
                                       SIPHON"""
                  i-GAS ,
                WET-TEST
                GAS  METER
                                           EFFLUENT

                                          .SAMPLE
                                           TAPS
                               FILTER
                                                 EFFLUENT
                                                 COLLECTION
                                                 BOTTLE
Figure 3.   Schematic Illustration of Anaerobic Filter
             System.
        FEED
        BOTTLE
     PERISTALTIC
      PUMP   V
BAFFLES
                     ROTATING
                      / DISCS
                    C
                 ORGANISMS
                                                       GAS
                                                  INVERTED
                                                  SIPHON      c=a=>
                                                   EFFLUENT
                                                   COLLECTION
                                                   BOTTLE
Figure 4.  Schematic  Illustration of Anaerobic Rotating
            Biological Contactor System.
                                 1197

-------
plates.  The  liquor  passed through in a horizontal direction
and  contacted   the   microorganisms   on  the  plates.    The
reactor's liquid  volume  was 700 ml.   The gas  outlet was on
top of  the  reactor;  the liquid outlet was on  the side.  The
outlet level was controlled by an inverted siphon.

Experimental  Procedures.    A  complex  protein-carbohydrate
mixture  was  selected   as  the  substrate  for  the  study.
Nutrient broth, an almost  pure protein mixture, and glucose,
a pure  carbohydrate,  were combine'd in  equal chemical oxygen
demand  (COD)  quantities to  make  up the  feed  with tapwater.
Sufficient  nitrogen  and  phosphorous  were  available  in  the
nutrient broth  for anaerobic  growth.   A  sodium bicarbonate
buffer  solution  was  sterilized separately and  then added to
the feed solution to maintain the pH between 6.7 and 7.4.
     The reactors  were  seeded  with  anaerobic  sludge  from a
municipal treatment  plant,  and were  operated  at  a constant
temperature of  35°C  ± 0.5°C in a walk-in controlled-tempera-
ture chamber.   At  the same hour each  day, gas production was
recorded  at  atmospheric  pressure  with  a  wet-test  meter
(Precision Scientific Co., Model 63115).
     Twice a week, routine laboratory measurements of samples
withdrawn from  the various  levels of  the  reactors included
COD, pH and total volatile acids.  Gas composition was deter-
mined weekly  by gas  chromatography.   Effluent alkalinity was
occasionally  monitored.   Standard analyses  were carried out
according to Standard Methods (9).
     Detailed  results are  presented   first  for  the  baffled
reactor, and  then its  performance is compared,  with  that of
the other reactors.

RESULTS FOR BAFFLED REACTOR

Start-up and  Loading.   Initially,  the organic loading of the
baffled  reactor  was kept  at  2   kg  COD/m  d  and  then  was
increased  gradually  up  to  a  loading  of  20   kg  COD/m "d.
Reactor  performance  was  constantly monitored.   Thereafter,
the  organic  loading  was  stepwise  reduced back   to  5  kg
COD/m3'd.    In  a  third phase,  the   hydraulic  loading  was
varied, while maintaining the organic  loading  at a constant
level  of  5 kg  COD/m  d.  The  loading  scheme,  together with
the influent  COD concentrations are shown in Figure 5.

Treatment Efficiencies.   While increasing  loading between 3
and  7  kg COD/m3'd,  the  COD removal  was essentially  constant
at  about 78%,  and decreased  to  55%  at  a loading  of  20 kg
                               1198

-------
          10
    u_
    2


    Q

    S
      0



      4
      10
    tr
    Q
    £    o


         20
    q E '

       Q
       o
^Q fO
    O
                    1        1
                    \

           0       50      100     150      200


                DAYS   OF   OPERATION
Figure 5.  Loading Schedule for Anaerobic Baffled Reactor.
                           1199

-------
COD/m *d  (Figure  6).   The COD  removal  was linear  up  to an
organic  loading  of  12  kg COD/m  d.   The maximum attainable
COD removal  rate  with this small reactor was  10 kg COD/m3*d
for organic loadings above 16 kg COD/m  d.
     The decreasing  loading range showed  a significant devia-
tion from the increasing  loading range operation.  It appear-
ed that  this was caused by the formation  of gelatinous growth
of  bacteria at  the  head end  of  the  reactor  which  caused
short-circuiting of  substrate  through  channels in the sludge
blanket.

Gas Production  Rates and Methane Content  of  Gas.   The  gas
production  rate  (Figure  7)  increased linearly  with organic
loading up  to 10 kg  COD/m3'd.  Above that, there was a slight
downward deviation  from the  linear  increase.   The percentage
of  methane   in  the  gas  was  70% up  to  a loading  of 7  kg
COD/m  d  and methane  content  then decreased to  50% at  a
loading  of,  20  kg   COD/m3"d.    The performance   during  the
decreasing  loading  range  showed only  a  small  deviation from
the increasing  loading  range  for  the gas production  rate,
whereas  this  difference   is  more  evident for   the  methane
percentage.   Overall, the gas production  rate and  the methane
content  of  gas coincide  well  with  the COD removal  rate  and
the treatment efficiency.

Modified Baffled  Reactor.   In order  to  improve  the perfor-
mance of  the baffled reactor, a  reduction in  the gelatinous
growth  of  bacteria  that  occurred  in  the head  end of  the
reactor was  needed.   Also, high volatile acid concentrations
occurring  with  high  substrate  concentrations  had  to  be
controlled  to  minimize buffer  additions.  , Recirculation of
effluent to  dilute  the  influent waste  concentration to about
             o
5  to  10 kg/m  significantly reduced both of  these problems.
This is  shown by the intitial results with the  enlarged and
modified  baffled    reactor   (Table   I).      The  treatment
efficiencies and  gas production  rates  are higher than with
the smaller  baffled reactor without  recycle.    Still  higher
loadings should be possible.

COMPARITIVE EVALUATION OF REACTOR PERFORMANCE

     The three different  types of laboratory-scale, high-rate
reactors were investigated and  their  performance is compared
in Table  II.   All  data  were taken at steady  state,  and the
loadings and rates  are  based on  void volume.    Two  of  the
reactors,  the  anaerobic  filter  (AF)  and  the   anaerobic
                                1200

-------
            ORGANIC    LOAD  kg COD / m-d
Figure 6.  Baffled Reactor COD Removal Rate and Treatment
          Efficiency, Increasing Loading Range " (Circles),
          Decrerasing Loading Range  (Triangles),  and
          Influent Substrate Concentration was 8.6 kg
          COD/m3.
                           1201

-------
      "O
     to-
         10 -
      O
      h-
      o
      0  5
      O
      £
      V)
        100
      o^

      QJ
      LU
         50
          0
                           10
20
               ORGANIC  LOAD  kgCOD/m3.d
Figure 7.   Baffled Reactor Gas Production Rate and Methane
           Percentage of Gas.  Increasing Loading Range
           (Circles), Decreasing Loading Range (Triangles),
           and Influent Substrate Concentration was 8.6 kg
           COD/m3.
                             1202

-------
   Table I.  Initial Results With Modified Baffled Reactor
Data Set
o
Influent COD Concentration, kg/m
O O .
Hydraulic Loading, m /m day
Recycle Ratio: Or/0, m /m
v o
Organic Loading, kg COD/m day
COD Removal Efficiency, %
O Q '
Gas Production Rate, m /m day
Percent Methane, %
Effluent Volatile Acids, kg/m3
7.3
0.5
0.0
3.5
90
2.3
70
0.34
7.6
1.1.
0.4
8.3
82
4.5
56
0.80
8.1
1.1
2.3
9.0 .
78
4.3
56
0.70
8.3
1.3
2.0
10.6
91
6.9
53
0.40
         Table  II.   Comparison  of Reactor Performance
Reactor type
BR
Mod BR   AF
ARBC
Influent COD Concentration, kg/m
Organic Loading, kg COD/m day
O O
Hydraulic Loading, m /m day
Percent Efficiency, %
0 O
Methane Production Rate, m /m day
Percent Methane, %
Effluent Volatile Acids, kg/m3
7.1
7.1
1.0
79
2.0
70
0.8
7.6
8.3
1.1
82
2.5
56
0.8
8.0
8.0
1.0
92
2.6
80
0.4
8.0
8.0
1.0
90
2.7
78
0.5
rotating  biological  contactor  (ARBC)  are  considered to  be
fixed-film  type  reactors.     The   third  type,  the  baffled
reactor  (BR)  and the  modified baffled reactor  (mod  BR),  as
already described, may be considered as complete mixed sludge
blanket reactors  (10).  However, as shown in Table II, their
treatment behavior under  identical  conditions appeared to  be
similar.  For organic loadings between 7 and 8 kg COD/m  d,
the treatment  efficiencies  varied between 80 and 90%  and the
                                                      o  o
methane production rates  ranged between 2.0 and 2.7 m /m  d.
                               1203

-------
     This finding was  confirmed  in a study by Frostell (ID,
who  compared an  AF system  with  a sludge  blanket  reactor.
Over an organic loading range of  2 to  11.5 kg COD/nr "d and a
hydraulic loading  range  of 0.3 to  1.2  m3/m3'd,  the  behavior
of  the  two   reactors  proved  to  be essentially  identical,
providing  a  good  solids  retention  was  achieved.    This
similarity in behavior led to an attempt to model two reactor
types on a unified basis.

MODELING OF BAFFLED REACTOR PERFORMANCE

     A  fixed-film  model  was used  to evaluate the hypothesis
that  the baffled  reactor performance  can  be  modeled as  a
fixed-film reactor.  This evaluation is based upon the fixed-
film  model   of   Williamson   and  McCarty  (12)   as   further
evaluated by  Rittmann  and McCarty  (13).  The model provides a
closely  approximate,   explicit  solution  for the  flux of  a
limiting  substrate  into  a "deep"  fixed bacterial  film.   The
model  incorporates  concepts of  liquid-layer mass transport,
Monod   kinetics,   and  molecular  diffusion.    The  derived
equation  provides  an  explicit  solution for  the  flux into a
bacterial  film.   The  model has  been applied with reasonable
success  to  the AF  (12).   The reason  this model was thought
reasonable   for   the   baffled  reactor   is  that  the  sludge
particles  within  the  sludge  blanket  may be  considered as
fluidized  spheres  with surface area through which the solute
must  diffuse for  bacteria  conaumption.   The reactor may be
considered as a  sequence of five  separate  chambers  connected
in a series as illustrated in Figure 8.
s° s01
0°


o°+on


S1

V,
S2

^
S3

V3
-~ s*

v*
55

V5
ss^


RECYCLE R. S5, 0R
Q°


   Figure 8.   Flow Diagram of a Model of a  Baffled Reactor.
                                 1204

-------
     For  a  complete-mix  reactor  with  specific  flow,  rate
Q(T  )  and  specific  surface  area  a  (surface  area  per  unit
reactor volume, L  ), a mass balance on substrate gives
   = -aCS
dt
                            03   - OS
                            '
where S is the bulk-liquid  substrate  concentration  (ML."),-  S°
the  influent  concentration,  C  the  variable-order reaction
coefficient and q  the variable-order.reaction order.  For  the
steady-state case, Eq. ] can be solved algebraically for S:

                  S = S°  - (|)CSq                         (?.)

The model was  applied by  estimating  the  specific  surface area
a for each of  the five  chambers from profile-data  of profile
1  and  applying  these  values  of  a  to  predict  the reactor
behavior  for  other  loadings  (Profiles   2-4).   This approach
assumes a  constant specific  surface  area  a for  each reactor
chamber over  the  course  of the study,  which  may  not  neces-
sarily  have   been  true.    Equation   (2)  must   be   solved
iteratively for S  for each  compartment of  the reactor and  due
to  the  recycling,  another  iteration cycle  needs  to be done
over  the   overall  reactor,   assuming  ~a  certain  recycle
substrate  concentration.   A mass  balance of  influent  and
recycle streams  was used  to  determine  the concentration  in
the stream entering  the  first reactor.
     Figure 9  presents experimental  results  and model predic-
tions  for  the kinetic  coefficients  and model  parameters  of
Table III.   The  kinetic coefficients are based on  the  values
of  Lawrence  and  McCarty (15),  and  the model  parameters  on
values  from  Williamson  (16)  and Williamson  and  Chung  (17).
Overall,  the  predictions  were good,  although the model  as
applied,  resulted  in a  lower rate of removal for Profiles  2,
3 and 4 than actually found.  This  probably was partly  due  to
use  of  a  constant diffusion  layer  depth  CL)  for  all  cases.
This  depth would,  however,  decrease  with increased  gas  mixing
at  higher  loadings,  leading  to  higher   removal   rates   as
noted.    Also,  the  increased  mixing  at  high  loading  rates
would probably increase  the  area exposed  to  the  substrate.
Both  of these  corrections would lead to a  better fit between
predicted and measured performance.
     A  similar evaluation was  performed assuming a series  of
completely-mixed  dispersed growth  reactors and  using  Monod
kinetics.  Values  for active  microorganism  concentration were
                                1205-

-------
                                PROFILE !
                                        R = 0
                                        0 = 2.4 day'
                                        S°= 7.3 kg/m3
                                PROFILE 2
                                        R=0.37
                                        0= 7.7 day'1
                                        S°= 7.6 kg/m3
                                       -t-
                                PROFILE 3
                                        R=2.3
                                        0= 18.2 day-'
                                        S°= 8.1 kg/m3
                                        R=2.0
                                        0=19.2 day'
                                        S°= 3.3 kg/m3
                          SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Figure  9.   Comparison Between  Steady-State Predictions Using
            Fixed-Film Model for  Baffled Reactor and Experi-
            mental  Data.   T = 35°C,  Kinetic Coefficients Used
            are Shown in Table  III.   Refer to  Figure 8 for
            Flow Diagram of Baffled Reactor Model.
                                  1206

-------
    Table III.  Kinetic Coefficients and Model Parameters
Process
      Methanogenesis
Limiting Substrate
Temperature, °C
k, mg COD/mg VSS-da.y
Kg, mg/cm
         3
(acetate + proprionate)  - COD
             35
              8
            -0.2
Xf, mg VSS/cm5 for
chamber 1 to 5
L , cm
DW, cm "/day
D£, cm /day
10, 8, 8, 8, 5
0.01.
0.8
0.64
determined   in each chamber  for  one  loading case, and these
values  were  used to  predict  substrate  profiles  for other
loadings.   .The  results   as  summarized  in  Figure  10  were
poor.   Such a  model  does  not give realistic  interpretations
of  the  data as  diffusional  limitation in bringing substrate
to bacteria is  not considered.
 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS              .

     An anaerobic  sludge blanket process, termed the baffled
 reactor, has  been  developed  which  shows  excellent promise  for
 industrial wastewater treatment.  It combines . the advantages
                               1207

-------
          01
          e o
          Q o
          O 8
          O
                               	1	
                                PROFILE 1
        1	1—

        R = 0
        0 = 2.4 day-'
        S°=7.3 kg/m3
                                PROFILE 2
                                        R = 0.37
                                        Q= 7.7 day"'
                                        S° = 7.6 kg/m3
PROFILE 3
        R=2.3
        0=18.2 day'1
        S°=8.1 kg/m3
                                               O
                                              —I-
^-^^ 0=19.2
— S°=8.3
day-'
kg/m3
-
i i i i 	 1 	 5
                     -01    S1      S2     S3

                           SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Figure  10.  Comparison Between  Steady-State  Predictions Using
            Dispersed Growth Model for Baffled Reactor and
            Experimental Data.   Refer to Figure 8 for Flow
            Diagram of Baffled  Reactor Model.
                                  1208

-------
of  the  anaerobic filter (3), which has  a high stability and
reliability  due  to attachment of  the  biological solids onto
and between  the  filt.er media,, and, the upflow a,naerqbic sludge
process  (5)  in which the microbial mass itself functions as
the support medium for organism .attachment, leading to a high
void volume.
     The  baffled  reactor's  construction,  however,  avoids
certain  significant  limitations  of   these other  reactors.
Specifically, the risk of clogg'ing and the  risk of sludge bed
expansion  with  resulting  high  microbial  losses have  been
minimized.   The  baffled reactor maintains a high ;void volume
without   the  need  of  expensive and   operationally  work
intensive   gas.  collection  systems   or  sludge .separation
systems.   The over  and under  liquid  flow reduces bacterial
washout  considerably,  and  does  not require unusual settling
properties for the microbial culture.
     Although scale  up  factors  are difficult to predict, the
influence  of gas  stirring  will  be  more  important  in  large
reactors  due  to  the  fact that gas is  produced throughout the
whole  column height  in the  reactor.    This should  .lead to
greater  evolution  of gas per unit horizontal cross-sectional
area, leading  to more complete mixing  in the upper portioii' of
the chamber.  It should  also result in greater turbulence and
resulting  increase  in  mass  transfer  rates.    These aspects
should  lead  to better efficiencies in large scale reactors..
However,  other  scale factors may  decrease these advantages.
Thus,  large  scale  experiments  are  now  needed  for  better
evaluation of the baffled reactor  patented.
     The  biofilm model  appears  to be  generally applicable to
sludge blanket reactors.  This  suggest a  unified approach can
be  used  in  modeling   several  of  the  high  rate  anaerobic
reactors.   This  aspect  is  of importance  as the model is able
to  predict  the  performance  from fundamentals  of  bacterial
kinetics  and mass  transport.  Although  this preliminary work
seems promising, future research  is  needed to confirm  these
observations  and to better  include effects, of .turbulence on
mass transfer rates  to biofilms.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS        '                    .    ,

     This  research was  supported by  Research Sub-Grant No.
XR-9-8174-1   from  the  Solar  Energy   Research  Institute,   a
division of Midwest Research Institute.
                               1209

-------
SYMBOLS
The following symbols are used in this paper:
    a =
    C =
   Df
   k =
    L
    Q
    q
    R
    S
    o
    t
   V.
   specific surface area per unit reactor volume (L
   variable-order reaction coefficient (-);
                                          2,p-l i.
                                                          1
                                                           );
=  molecular diffusivity in bulk liquid (L T
=  molecular diffusivity in biofilm (L T  );
                                      L~ );
   maximum specific rate of substrate
   utilization (MgM^V"1) ;
   half-velocity coefficient (Mg
   length of effective diffusion layer (L);
   specific flow rate, (T  "> >
   variable-order reaction order, (-);
   recycle ratio, (-);
   bulk-liquid substrate concentration, (ML"-');
   influent substrate concentration, (ML  );
   time, (T);
   biofilm density, (ML~3);
   volume of individual reactor chamber, (L )
REFERENCES
                                                of  Anaerobic
                                                International
                                                 Travemuende,
McCarty,  P.   L.,   "One  Hundred  Years
Treatment,"   Presented  at  the  Second
Conference    on   Anaerobic    Digestion,
Germany, September 7,  1981.
Schroepfer,   G.  J.,  et  al.,   "The Anaerobic  Contact
Process as Applied  to  Packinghouse  Wastes,"  Sewage and
Industrial Wastes, Vol  27, 1955, p  460.
Young, J.  C.  and McCarty, P. L., "The Anaerobic Filter
for  Waste  Treatment,"  Journal Water Pollution Control
Federation, Vol  41,  1969, R  160.
Switzenbaum,   M.S.   and   Jewell,   W.   J.,  "Anaerobic
Attached-Film Expanded-Bed Reactor Treatment," Journal
Water  Pollution  Control Federation,  Vol 52,  1980,  p
1953.
Lettinga,  G.,   et.  al.,  "Use  of  the  Upflow Sludge
Blanket  (USB) Reactor  Concept  for  Biological Wastewater
Treatment,    Especially   for    Anaerobic  Treatment,"
Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol  22,  1980, p 699.
                                 1210

-------
 6.   Jennet,  J.  C.,  and  Dennis,  N.  D.,  Jr.,   "Anaerobic
      Filter   Treatment   of  Pharmaceutical   Waste,"  Journal
      Water  Pollution  Control Federation,  Vol 47,  1975,  p
      104.
 7.   Baugh,  K.   D.,  et. al.,  "Characterization and Methane
      Fermentation    of   Soluble   Products    from    Staged
      Autohydrolysis   of Wood,"   Proceedings  of   the  Third
      Symposium  on  Biotechnology  in  Energy  Production  and
      Conservation, Tennessee,  1981.
 8.   Tait,  S. J., and  Friedman,  A. A.,  "Anaerobic Rotating
      Biological   Contactor  for   Carbonaceous   Wastewaters,"
      Journal  Water  Pollution Control  Federation,  Vol   52,
      1980,  pp.  2257.
 9.   Standard Methods   for  the  Examination  of  Water   and
      Wastewater.      14th   ed. ,     American   Public   Health
      Association,  New York, NY  1975.
10.   Hearties,. P. M. and  Van Der Meer, R. R. , "Dynamics  of
      Liquid Flow  in  an Up-flow  Reactor  Used  for Anaerobic
      Treatment     of    Wastewater,"     Biotechnology     and
      Bioengineering,  Vol 20,  1978,  pp  1577-1594.
11.   Frostell,   B.,   "Anaerobic  treatment  in   a  sludge  bed
      system  compared  with a  filter  system,"  Journal Water
      Pollution  Control Federation,  Vol  53,  1981,  p 216.
12.   Williamson,   K.  and  McCarty,  P.  L.,   "A Model   of
      Substrate   Utilization  by   Bacterial  Films,"  Journal
      Water  Pollution Control Federation,  Vol 48,  1976, p  9.
13.   Rittmann,  B.  E.,   and McCarty,  P.  L.,  "Variable-Order
      Model   of   Bacterial-Film  Kinetics,"  Journal  of   the
      Environmental Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol  104,  No.
      EE5, Proc.  Paper 14067,  1978,  pp  889-900.
14.   Rittmann,  B. E,.  and  McCarty, P.  L.,  "Design of  Fixed-
      Film Process with Steady-State-Bio.f ilm Model,"  Progress
      in Water Technology,  Vol 12, 1980,  pp 271-281.
15.   Lawrence,   L.   A.   and  McCarty,  P.  L.,  "Kinetics   of
      Methane Fermentation  in Anaerobic  Treatment," Journal
      Water  Pollution Control Federation,  Vol 41,  1969, Rl.
16.   Williamson,  K.    J.,   "The  Kinetics   of   Substrate
      Utilization by Bacterial Films,"  Ph.D. thesis presented
      to Stanford University, Stanford,  California, 1973.
17.   Williamson, K.  J.,  and Chung, T. M.,  "Dual Limitation
      of  Substrate  Utilization  Kinetics  Within  Bacterial
      Films," presented at March  19,   1975,   49th  National
      Meeting   of    the   American  Institute   of   Chemical
      Engineers, Houston, Texas.
                               1211

-------
   PART XI:  AEROBIC AND ANAEROBIC TREATMENT-SUBMERGED MEDIA
             REACTORS
    TREATMENT OF HIGH-STRENGTH ORGANIC WASTES BY SUBMERGED
                  MEDIA ANAEROBIC REACTORS
                  STATE-OF-THE-ART REVIEW
    Yeun C. Wu, Department of Civil Engineering, University
                of Pittsburgh, Penna
    John C. Kennedy, Department of Civil Engineering, University
                of Pittsburgh, Penna
    A. F. Gaudy, Jr., Department of Civil Engineering,
                University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware
    Ed. D. Smith, Environmental Division, U. S. Army
                Construction Engineering Research Lab
INTRODUCTION

     The anaerobic filter is basically an oxygen-free, media-
filled bed reactor.  Anaerobes grow not only in the void
spaces between the media but also on the entire surface of
the media.  The wastewater can be distributed from the top
(stationary type reactor) or it can be fed, across the bottom
of the filter (suspended type reactor).  The latter type, the
upflow reactor, is more popular than the downflow reactor.
However, both reactors have completely submerged filter media
that is arranged in either a packed bed or fluidized bed
(Figure 1).

     If anaerobic filters are classified on the basis of
flow pattern, there are two main types: plug flow and com-
plete mix.  When the wastewater passes through an anaerobic
plug-flow filter reactor, the pH decreases initially as a
result of acid fermentation, and then increases in the
direction of the process flow, due to the biological removal
of the generated fatty acids, formation of ammonia and
reduction of sulfates.  Since the acidic pH in the bottom
                                1212

-------
   Recycle Line
Out
Out
IN


Figure 1.
                          IN
                      Plastic
                       Media
                      (A)
                       (C)
       IN
     Stones,
Rings, or
Granular
Media
    (B)
     (D)
                        Out
                           Out
                                                                        IN
                   Schematic  of Anaerobic  Filters-  (A)  and (B)
                   Downflow Reactors;  (C)  and  (D) Upflow Reactors
                                   1213

-------
 section of  the  filter  can potentially  inhibit the methane-
 forming bacteria, substantial amounts  of buffer solutions
 are added to the influent waste stream to prevent such pH
 decreases.

     A completely mixed anaerobic filter would not experience
 the pH decrease observed in plug-flow  units, since the
 mixing maintains a  fairly uniform pH throughout the depth of
 the filter.  The mixing of the filter  is achieved by recir-
 culating the effluent into the filter at a large recycle: feed
 ratio.  This in turn would eliminate the need for adding
 costly buffer solutions.  If the effluent has a sufficient
 bicarbonate buffer  capacity, it is even able to neutralize
 feed solutions  with an acidic pH.

     The decomposition of waste water by the anaerobic
 filter has traditionally been considered to involve two
 stages.  In the first  stage, complex materials such as fats,
 proteins, and carbohydrates (COD)  are hydrolyzed, fermented,
 and converted to simple organic acids and alcohols by
 facultative and anaerobic acid-forming bacteria.  There is no
waste stabilization during the first step because there is no
methane production.  Waste stabilization occurs in the second
 stage when the  volatile organic acids are converted to carbon
 dioxide and methane by a special group of bacteria termed the
methane formers.  The raethanogens are the most important group
of bacteria because they carry out the final step in the
overall process.  They have slow growth rates and their
metabolism is usually considered rate-limiting in the
anaerobic stabilization of waste.   However, the success of
the process is  dependent on the presence of both acid-
producing and methane-producing bacteria,  with the gas produc-
tion stage responsible for   stabilization of the organic
materials.

     Figure 2 represents the overall process of anaerobic
digestion according to the traditional concept.   While the
distribution of carbon through the various types of inter-
mediates may be correct, it is now recognized that the
methane-forming bacteria do not utilize a variety of organic
acids as substrate.   Methane is formed from acetic acid,  formic
acid, CO 2 and H2.  Thus, the methane fermentation occurs  only
                              1214

-------
               COMPU*
                WASJS
                                  OTHER
                              INTERMEDIATES
Figure 2. Metabolic Pathway IP. Methane Fermentation
        of Complex Organic Hastes [ taken from
        McCarty ( 1 )]
          1215

-------
in the lower part of the figure and other organisms are
responsible for the center portion, i.e., the conversion of
various low-molecular weight acids and alcohols to the sub-
strates useable by the methane-formers.

     A major advantage of the anaerobic filter is its ability
to produce methane gas.  In general, the percentage of methane
in the gas evolved from.the filter is between 70 and 80%.
Theoretically this gas could be used to heat the incoming
wastewater or the reactor, thus increasing the efficiency of
the filter and decreasing power requirements.  The ability
to use the methane gas in this way will depend on the quantity
of gas produced.  The volume of methane gas produced is
approximately 4.3 to 8.0 ft3 per Ib COD stabilized.

     The major factors influencing anaerobic filter performance
include organic loading, hydraulic detention time, temperature,
pH, alkalinity, wastewater characteristics, flow pattern, and
type of filter media.  These physical and chemical controlling
factors generally have the same effects on the anaerobic
filter as on the conventional suspended-growth anaerobic
digestion system, except that the fixed-film anaerobic filter
can be operated with higher organic loading, COD:N:P ratio,
and metal concentrations.

     Start-up of an anaerobic filter probably is the most
difficult period of operation.  Start-up times in experimental
full-scale units have ranged from 10 to 180 days, with the
shorter times corresponding to the use 'of large amounts of
active seed while the longer times were associated with the
use of light seeding.

     Analysis of the action of the process during start-up
has indicated three factors of importance.  First, the slow
growth of anaerobic micro-organisms, especially at low
waste concentrations and at temperatures below 30°C, does
not permit rapid build-up of biological solids.  Consequently,
a large seed mass is needed for rapid start-up.  Secondly,
decreases in the buffering capacity of the waste, so that the
pH drops below about 6.5 at any point within the filter for
even short periods of time, increases the starting time
significantly.  A third factor affecting start-up time is
related to the physical characteristics of the biological
                               1216

-------
suspended solids within the filter.  During the early stages
of operation a significant fraction of the biological solids
remain finely dispersed throughout the liquid phase _and a
significant proportion washes out with the filter effluent.
At some time after initial seeding , flocculation of the
biological solids occurs in the filter and the solids washout
rate decreases, thereby increasing b9th the rate of active
biological solids accumulation and the rate of waste treatment.

     The optimum method of seeding a filter is not known.
Large seed volumes help to start the filter more rapidly by
providing a large viable microbial population, and the large
amounts of suspended solids help to promote the surface
adhesion and flocculation which seem to be essential to good
operation.  However, using large seed volumes may also con-
tribute significant amounts of volatile and non-volatile
solids which tend to plug the filter and reduce its effective-
ness for treating wastes.

CASE HISTORIES

     Upflow anaerobic filters have been built in England
since 1876 to purify sewage but the organic removal was mainly
thought to be due to adsorption (2).  Coulter, et al. (3) and
Witherow, et al. (4) .employed an anaerobic rock filter
following an anaerobic sludge contactor.  The combined processes
produced a 65% reduction of BOD with most of it occurring
in the first unit.  Winneberger et al. (5) employed an
anaerobic filter following a septic tank and noted a 65%
BOD removal and a 70% suspended solids removal at a 5-day
detention time.  Research on anaerobic filters was published
in 1968 by Young and McCarty (6).  Loadings ranging from
26.5 Ib COD/day/1000 cubic feet (0.424 kg/day/m3* to
212 Ib COD/day/1000 cubic feet  (3.392 kg/day/m3) were tested
with theoretical detention times from 5.4 to 72 hours.  COD
removals ranged from 68% to 98%.  Young and McCarty found that,
at the same organic loading, the percentage•of COD removal
increased when the concentration of the influent COD increased.
*Kg COD/day/m3 = 0.016 Ib COD/day/1000 ft3
                              1217

-------
      Ham and Boyle  (7)  found that anaerobic treatment  could
 effectively stabilize a raw leachate of approximately  10,000
 mg/1 COD with  a detention time of 10 days  and loading  less
 than 32 Ib COD/day/1000 cubic feet (0.512  kg/day/m3).   This
 system reduced COD  by about 90%.   A system with a  12.5-day
 detention time and  loading of 13.0 Ib COD/day/1000 cubic  feet
 (0.208 kg/day/m3) increased the COD removal efficiency to
 93%.   Poree and Reid (8)  obtained a COD reduction  of 96%  for
 leachate with  a COD of 12,900 mg/1.   They  obtained a higher
 degree of treatment at a loading  of 80.2 Ib COD/day/1000  cubic
 feet (1.283 kg/day/m3).   Chian and DeWalle (9) concluded  that
 a high strength wastewater with an acidic  pH can be  success-
 fully treated  using a completely  mixed anaerobic filter.  Table
 1 summarizes results of studies done with  anaerobic  filters.

      Anaerobic treatment processes are very effective  in
 removing heavy metals from waste  streams by adsorption and
 precipitation.  Digester studies  have shown that heavy metals
 are  present primarily in the solid phase as opposed  to the
 aqueous phase.  High metal removals result from the  separation
 of the solids.  A municipal digester study by Rudgal (32)
 found the influent  copper concentration at 226 mg/1  while the
 concentration  in the effluent supernatant  was 11 mg/1.  The
 concentration  in the sludge was as high as 500 mg/1.   Chian
 et al.  (33)  investigated the anaerobic filter and  obtained up
 to 95.5% metal removal.   When these removals were  calculated
 with respect to soluble concentrations,  the percentage increased
 to 97.1%.   This indicates that significant quantities  of  heavy
 metals are associated with the suspended solids leaving the
 filter.   They  concluded that their completely mixed  anaerobic
 filter was effective in removing  heavy metals.  And  as the
 metal concentrations increased in the effluent, the  effective-
 ness of the filter  increased.   The metals  are removed  from
 the  filter as  a slurry in the bottom of the filter as  they
 precipitate.   They  also indicated that with decreasing hydraulic
 detention time the  metal removal  percentage decreased  while
 the  metal content in the bottom slurry increased.

SOLIDS PRODUCTION AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS

    ^A remarkable advantage of the anaerobic filter is its
ability to retain active biological solids  for long periods
of time.  There is a continual build-up of  solids  in  the
                             1218

-------
T3
CD
 O
 O
 CD
_a
 ro
4-> t—
E ^
CD CD
3 E

t| — •
CH- CO
LU •
to

ro
t * >
&s o o
C-J E
CD




E
o
•i- CD •
4-> E to
E -r- J-
O) 1 — -E

CD
00
<+-

o
COO
E CD
a T- i— i
o -a --^
CJ) ro >
O ro
i— "t!
r-H



CO
CJ
•1 —
4-5
to
CD •!-
4_> £_
1 CO CD
rc 4-J
3: o
ro

ro
JE
r "i







S~
O
ro
CO
., —
[ S
to
CD

E
t — i



O
LO
O-i
1
o
OJ 1

CO LO
co cr>

i i

LO O
LO r--








co co
•^i- <-H



LO
r--

i
i--.
LO OJ
OJ •*
en


O
+J O
E O r—

O") ^^ d")
S_ 'E
CD 1
4-5 O
CD CD CD
C3 CD CD
Or
O " 1—1—1
•i— OJ ro t-H
E O
O II CD II
•i- 5-
E O 4-5 O
O CD CD O
^: <-) s: c_>

, — . , — ,
co to r^
r — i — i i — '
cn ^ — - o3 ^ — ^
CD TD
•— -r- 0
r— C|_ o
CD ro CO
. _a JE -a
O. CO O
E 10
ro i—i—
CJ) LU 03


0
CD

1

O
i— 1

co


i

<^j-
cn



CO
<=*•

i

OJ
r-l

0
OJ
OJ

1


«^f-


1 —
-^^
cn
E

0
CD
r— CD
ro CD
O * — '
•r- 1
4—*- CD
3 LO
CD OJ
O r-l
rO
E CD II
S- 4->
ro co CD
JE ro CD
a. 3: c_>
4->
CD. 	 	
E CO
E r-l
CD^ 	
l""3
o3

CO
•r—
E
E
CD
Q








1
fe« ro
CO >
LO O
E
1 CD
o^
r-.
OJ Q
o
CQ

LO
CT>

1

cn
CO

LO
1--.
co

1

LO
OJ
t-H

-^
CD CO

*[—
M- CD
i— CD
rs co
C/O LO

CD 1
CO O
ro O
3: co
r-H
CD S-
4-J O II
13 E> LO
r— 0-0
•r- -I- CD
o _i ca
E
rO * — ^

E * — '
jr-- 	

oS

E
O
to
r—
• I —
S








1

CO
r*«.

r

«^j-
CD



CD
<^f

1

r^-«
t-H


o
CO
t — i

i

LO
CO
O co *^ i
O "TD" r™ "^^-^
i — -i- O CD CO

•r- -0. CD
E CO OJ
ro CD "
cn-o i— i
t- >, 0
CD JE O O
CD >->O
O -O r— CD
•i — i — CD **
-l-> eC OJ
CD •>
-E " CD II
4-5 CO E
Ei — -r- CD
>i 0 E O
CO -E 
0
rn
                                   1219

-------



































T3
CU
3
C

-P
E
o
0

1— 1

cu

o
rd
t-H
1 ' ^^
E cn
cu E
3
51 (/)
LU tO
rO
Q >
SSO S
cu
C£

E
O
•r—
4J CU
E E to
0> -r- $-
+J 1— -E
QJ
QC
CO
M-
cro
E O
Q -r- O
^3 ' U *~~^
CO rd ^
0 2?
i — rd
•O


to
O
4J
to
CU T-
rd 4->
3 O
rd
rd
_E
0



s-
a

rd
en
•r-
| ^
to
CU

E
1 — 1
O
o
LO

1
0
[
.— 1
^
01
,

0
CO
o
CO
CO

1
LO
t— 1


o
o

i
o
LO
i- o -^
o o cn
3 0 E
cr •>
Jj CM
in i
to
cu o
s- o
o CD
S-
cu u
CU Q
S- 0
03 O


»— 1
• CM
r— ^ — ^


-{-}
CU

CU
cu
S-
o
u_






1
^
cn
i

CO
""•

co
«xi"

i
CM
t— 1


O
LO
<^j-
1
CM
<£)
0 r-
i— CD ~-^
i — o3 t-H Cn
SO tD
CU 'r- r— 1
to S- 4-> «
O CU CU ~O 1
O Q- O T—
3 rd >=C O C3
•— D. , rd •!- CM
E S- <^ i —
O O) CU O II
«4-> S T3 C->
Q. O) E >>O
CU S_ O i— O
D. 03 C_> CD (—


CM
CM
•• — ^




E
rd
E
•o
^






1 I




r^ LO
cn cn




CO
CO O
<^t- o
to * — '
i
rd II
3 O
O T-
S— -P
•P- rd * — ^
o s- o
CU OJ
0 $_ E ••
r -^i 	 o «— i
•p—
E
rd
O CU
•i— en to 4-5
13 E T3 rd
CU 1 	 •!-•!- T- S-
4-> ~-^ CJ E O "O
rd Cn ^
^r E rd -E
O JE 4-5 O) O
rd O 4-> E i — -Q
CU O cn O -i- S-
_J O E CJ 4-5 rd
«> CU rd O
r— CD i- CU i—
, — OO 4-* •*-* O X
•t- t/1 rd > CU
^- ll ^: •—
-o ^: o cu Q-
E C2 cn rd O) E
rd CD -r- CU S- O
	 i 
CU O)

• — co i — cn
rd CM rd •> — '
s ** — ^ s
cu cu
Q Q

o25 o3

E E
rd rd
•r- *t—
JZ J^
0 CJ






























cn
to
0 0
••- 0
E cn
rd "
cnCM
S- t-H
O
It
cu
•r- O
r— CJ














1220

-------
















CD
E
03
E

O
q-
S-
CD
Q.
CD
• 1 —
U-

O
•i —
.a
o
i-
cu
03
E
CD
1 ^

q-
o

CO
E
O

4_5
03
cn
•r—
[ ^
CO
CD
>
E
l — i

I-H
cv
f'*m


&SO O
o E
CD
a;



E
O

4-> CD CO
E E S-
 j. —
cu
CO
q-

cno
E 0
Q -i- O
o -a i— i
O 03 --^
0 >,
i — 03
-a
••^,
i— i



co
CJ

^o
CO
CD -r-
4-* £—
CO CD
03 4->
2 CJ
03

03
f*
CJ







5-
0

03
en
• ! —
4_5
CO
CU
>
r*
l — i

O
LO
CM

1


CO

CO
cn

i

CO
LO


CM
[•^

I

LO
,
"*
CM
f-H
CM

1

LO
•
CO
CM


1
O
s_
O-
r— 1
•a cu -^.
E •»-> en
03 03 E

-a -o CD
•r— >^j CD
O c~ O
•=C O CM
-Q i— 1
CD S- 1
i — O3 LO
•r- cj r--
-t-> CM
03 E II
r— -i- Q
O CD CD
> -l-> CJ


1 ^
€. ^ — «
03 VO
CJ 	
O
^~

o?S

cn
E

O

o
LO
CO
I— 1
1
o
LO
•*

CO CO CD
00 CO .1—
<*"1
1 1 3
r—
O LO O
CO LO CO



CO
CO

1

CO
I— 1

CD
<^-
co

1

CD
0
t— 1


1
o

S-
03
CJ
r—
cn ~-^
E cn
•r- E
co
CO O
CD O
O LO
O *•
S- CD CO
Q- -M
03 II
"0 S-
o -a a
o >>o
U- .E CJ
03
E
•i — * 	
.— CD
03 r-H
^" *• — '

oQ

s-
cu
E
E

, —
QL.






1


O
CO

1

0
CO








CM
I— i







CD
1^
CO








^~
"- — _
en
E

"O O
••- 0
CJ «^f
•^C **
CO
CJ
•r- II
•4-3
CD Q
O O

0 0
0 0
S- 0
Q- *•
CO
o
4-> OJ II
03 -i->
4-1 CO ' '
O 03 O
0- 12 CJ
.
r—
O3 * 	 *
CM
•<-> i—i
CD — '
f\
CL. '
c^
O

-1 ^
^~-
•r—
03
Q-
o
CO
CO --—.
CO CD
• 1 CO
O CO
a i-\
CM 	
Q
1 CD
r- CJ
0
CO CD
i —
^^ ^
LO CO 3
CO 1 — •








CM
CM







r*^
CO
CM


, 	 ,
**^^
cn
E
OJ
-M 0
CO CD
03 O
~^Z r*
CO
C~ |
0 O
S- 0
03 O

00 CM

4-> 11
03
OJ O
.E CD
3 CJ


^~
03

^_>
CU

rt r—
S_ 1—
CD S- 03
•4-5 O -M
-Ei — CO
CJ >> S-
•r- 03 O
a; i— Q








t__
03
>
O
E
CD
t_















































.^ — %
LO
i-H

1

CO
1— 1
•» — ^





1221

-------
            CU  CH
            =3  E
           LU
               03
               O)
              D:
to
01
                                   CO
                                                                          CO
                                                                                    CO
        -t-> a)
         c E
         (U-
         OJ
                                   CO
                                                    oo
                                                                          CM
              oo
            cno
        a ••-
            to  >>
            o  to
                        CO
                                  CM
                                  CM
                                                                          CM
                                                                                    00
                                                                                    OO
                                                                                    CM
CO
            (LI 10
           -(-> -I-
            tO S-
            03 (!)
           3 -M
               o
               (O

               ro
                         CD
 O O
 to O
 cu cr>
  • CM
                        -o
                         c a
                         ro o
                        _l C_3
                                      •o
                                                           i—      i—      i-
                                                                                     o
                                                                                           O  CD
                                                                                           O  E
 O)  3
i—  CT
-Q-i-
 fO_l
 O)
i—  O
+J-1-
+->-!->
 ai  a»
C/7-
                                             r—     -a
                                             CD
                                                    cu
                                                           en
                                          CO ||
           o  >>
                                             o
 O    CD       CO
•=C    i-H
    CO          II
 co en ii
+•> "o       >>Q
 to 13 O    O> O
 tO i— O    <~ c ~>
3 OO CJ   3 —-
                      'QJ -~^    E     <£)
                      T3  CJ)    S- i—  t—I
                       s  e     oo
                                 u_  c:   i
                                     03
                                 t3 4-5  O
                                 •r-  13  CD
                                 O CQ  CD
D_ CD
                                                  CO   «
                                                  co
                                                  co a
                                                             CJ CM
                                                             CU -r- CD
                                                             o  o o
Q)
ta
               CO
               O)
                        o;
                         O)
                         O)
                            eo
                                                                                        00
                                  oo
                                                                                    •4-J
                                                    CD
                                                                (O
                                                               ^x:
                                                                to
                                                                          .CO
                                                                          N
                                         1222

-------
CD
O
CJ
 CD
JD
rO
-p I—
E ^>,
CD CD
3 E
<4- in
LU .
CO

ro
&s o o
CJ E
CD
a;

o
•i — •
4-> CD CO
E E i-
-M P "^
CD
Cd
CO
Cf-

o
o
o>o
E i-H
o -5 >,
CJ ro ro
0 T3
_Q
i —






C/)
CJ
•i —
4-)
CD CO
00 £
ro CD
-rg _^_)
O
to
&.
ra
e~
CJ
i-
o
CD
4J
CO
CD
E
I — i






1
^. •
cn
i

CO
00





^-f.
CXI



0
o
LO

1
CD
oo
oo

1 1
CD CD i—

ra  >-, CD
CD E » — i
U •!-
=C >• 1
"CJ . — O
•r- 0 0
O CJ CD
•,
r— F*"-.
O CD
•r- II
4-> CD CD
cu -o 4-> a
O >-, to CD
 0
co"
CXI



^
4J
•i —






1
CXI
CTl
1

CXI
r~-





^-J-
CXI



o
I — 1
CTl

1
CD
CTi
CO

-a
•1 — 1^
O CD O-^
=3; TD ocn
>> CDE
0 JE «
•r- CD "=3-
4-5 "O CXI
CD i —
O ra 1
«C E
S- O
•a o o
•r- u_ o
CJ
^^ r~~ r**1^
O i-H
O E
•i— ra II
E -E
S- 4-> Q
O CD CD
U_ 2! CJ














1
r--
cn
j

^j-
^
S-
CJ
^
^
0















o
cn
*— — ^ i

"=3" O
cn oo





5-j. ^-j.
CXI CXI



0
LO


1
o o
CXI LO
LO «d-

-a
O-^ CJ CD O^
t__j(_» c^ ~^^ f~~^rn
OE XOE
(_) _E «
LO -i— CD <=J- i —
co 4-> -a cxi ^.
CD i — CD
i cj ra i E
 CD
f O *• IT) **
CTl j II
CD E -E C
4-> Q S- 4-> Q -r- Q
co CD O CD O ro O
LU cj u_ 2: cj a cj














1
CD
oo
1

o
LO
CO
cn
1

•=3-
,_j!
t-H


o
LO
CXI
i-H

1
CO
LO
t— 1


c
o
zs
cr

	 1 -^
CD
4-> E
E
CD 0
E ^1"
4-> LO
ro "
CD r—l
^- r-4
I—
II

ro Q
CD CD
HZ CJ
cn
CXI

to

O
C
E
O
                               1223

-------
            cu  cr
            =3  E
               CO
               cu
                        CT>
                                       in
                                       CO
+J  CU

CU T- S-
        cu
        o;
             CO
                                       oo
                                       co
                                       co
                                       co
                                       CM
           CD t—1

        Q T-  >,
       CJ CO •
           O '
           i— JQ
                                       co
                               en
                                        O)
                               o
                               10
                                        0)  S- r-
    O)  to
           CO  O)
           3 -)->
               O
               CO
                         cu
                                       4->
                                       •M
                                        CU
                                   CD -
                                   -M
                                   (O
                                                .
                                              CT)
                           -(-> o
                         fO  O)
                        •t->  Z!
                         > to un
                         CU
                                           O
                           LU
01
               CO
                        r— O
                         (O CO
                         cu
                                            CO
                                      O  3
ai
CO
                                     i—  O)
               CU
                                      CU
                                         rsl
                                     1224

-------
filter due to biological synthesis and no appreciable loss
occurs until the filter becomes filled with highly concentrated
biological solids.  The filter can be operated for long periods
of time before sludge wasting is needed because a low percentage
of the COD removed is synthesized into biological solids.  A
material balance done by Chian and DeWalle  (9) indicated that
93% of the COD removed could be accounted for by the methane
gas formed.

     Observation of the physical characteristics of the sludge
within the filter indicates that the solids lie loosely in
the interstitial spaces rather than becoming attached to, the
surface of the media.  Plummer et al. (10) noted that solids
in their filter units were not attached strongly to the
media or to the sides of the unit.

     It has been recognized that several factors determine the
amount of solids leaving the anaerobic filter.  -Dennis and
Jennett (18) observed that the solids concentration was mainly
determined by the hydraulic detention time.  Young and McCarty
(6) observed a gradual accumulation of solids in the anaerobic
filter, during which time the effluent suspended solids remained
low.  Only after the filter reached its maximum storage capacity
would the effluent solids show an increase.  When the influent
waste contains solids, no net removal may be observed.  In
addition, it is noted that the porosity of the filter may have
a large effect on the solids concentration which is to be expected
since a lower void ratio will increase the collision frequency
between the solids and the filter media.

     The effluent characteristics cannot be categorized 'for
all anaerobic filters.  The properties of the effluent will be
dependent on on-site conditions such as influent concentrations
and loading rate.  Most effluents contain a rather low concentra-
tion of suspended solids,  a portion of which is readily settle-
able. •  All filters will have an effluent with a very low
dissolved oxygen content 1   This is a disadvantage of the filter
because the effluent cannot be discharged to the environment
until the D.O. is raised to minimum requirements.  The pH of
most reactor effluents should'range between 7.0 and 9.0.
                                 1225

-------
BEHAVIOR UNDER ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

     Anaerobic filters are much more resistant to variations
in waste load and environmental factors such as pH and tempera-
ture than originally thought.  Laboratory scale filters have
shown rapid adjustment to four-fold surges in influent load.

     There are four major types of transient loading or opera-
ting conditions that can affect filter performance:  (a)variations
in loading as a result of changes in flow rate or waste strength,
(b) intermittent operation,  (c) changes in pH, temperature, and
waste composition, and (d) influx of organic toxins or heavy
metals.

     (a)  Variations in Loading

     Tests by a number of investigators (6,14,18) have shown
that anaerobic filters can readily accept variations in load
caused by changing either or both the flow rate or the waste
strength, without being upset permanently.  The following equa-
tion proposed by Young (34)  suggests that changing the flow
rate and waste strength simultaneously so that the organic load
remains constant will not cause the effluent BOD to change.
               S  =
                e
                      PV
(1)
where
S  = effluent BOD concentration
S  = influent BOD concentration
K- = proportionality constant
K_ = proportionality constant
Q  = flow rate
P  = porosity of filter media
V  = volume of reactor tank
L  ~ organic loading to the filter

     The equation also indicates that if the flow rate is held
constant the "steady state" effluent BOD concentration will
vary directly with changes in influent BOD.  Data from El-
Shafie and Bloodgood (17)  and Dennis and Jennett (18)  support
this conclusion.
                                 1226

-------
     Short-term loading increases having a1 duration of one or
two hydraulic detention times can be expected to produce only
slight, short-term changes in effluent quality or gas pro-
duction.  Long-term changes, however,' will cause the COD and
volatile acid profiles, and the population dynamics and solids
concentrations, to shift until a new "steady state" level of
performance is reached.  Four-fold instantaneous increases in
loading have caused no permanent adverse effects on filter
performance.

     Chian and DeWalle (9) tested their complete mix anaero-
bic filter for its ability to withstand shock loads.  .When the
detention time, based on feed stream flow alone, was reduced
from 42 to 7 days for a ,1-day period, only a small change in
the pH was observed.  The pH decreased from 7.2 to 6.9 when
the detention time was reduced to 4.25 days for a 1-day period.
The gas production did not show a corresponding increase, as
high concentrations of organics were present in the effluent
of the unit, which reduced the organic removal efficiency
to 54%.  Solids in the filter were resuspended at the higher
flow rates which was indicated by the large differences in
the values for the filtered and unfiltered COD and the increase
in suspended solids.  When the detention time was restored
to 42 days, after the shock load, the effluent COD and suspended
solids concentrations returned to values only slightly higher
than those observed before the shock load.  Based on these
tests, it was concluded that the buffer capacity of the unit  .
is sufficient to prevent large pH depressions at relatively
short detention times.  However, at detention times as short
as three days, a large portion of the organics leave the unit
in the effluent stream and-the suspended solids experience an
increase.

      (b)  Intermittent Operation .

     The second major type of operating condition that can
affect filter performance is intermittent operation.  The
possibility has been tested by investigators (6,18) by
stopping all flow and load to filters for several days, as
might be used in practice for weekend operation, and there
was' essentially no loss in COD removal capacity or gas
production efficiency upon restarting at full load.  After
                                1227

-------
 fourteen  days of down-time without  feed,  the COD removal
 efficiency  decreased to  a greater extent, but  full COD
 removal capacity and gas production were  achieved after
 only three  to four days  of operation.  Longer  periods without
 feed might  be expected to produce a low quality effluent
 for quite a long period  of time after restoring waste load.

     (c)  Changes in pHr Temperature, and Waste Composition

     Anaerobic filters,  once  "steady state" operation is
 achieved, become quite resistant to pH changes.  Rapid
 recovery  has been observed in filters exposed  for a twelve
 hour period to pH levels as low as  5.4.  Exposure to pH levels
 of 9.3 for  as long as four days has caused only temporary
 loss of treatment efficiency.  While gas production and COD
 removal were impaired'at these extreme pH values, the filters
 recovered completely within one to  two days after restoring
 pH to normal levels.

     In general, anaerobic filters  are expected to perform
best at temperatures greater than 25° C.  Filters have been
 used successfully to treat potato processing wastes at
 temperatures as'low as 19° C, but too little information is
 available from which to draw significant conclusions about
 the effect  of lower temperatures on filter performances.

     Variations in waste composition are expected to produce
 little adverse response in anaerobic filters unless there is
 an associated influx of toxic materials.  However,  the
 composition of the waste significantly affects the solids
produced  in the system.  Biological solids will accumulate
much faster when treating a carbohydrate waste because synthe-
 sis of biological solids is greatest with carbohydrates, and
at high loadings problems such as plugging or solids washout
might be encountered.   However,  in studies to date,  no filter
has been reported to have become plugged beyond use.

     (d)   Organic Toxins or Heavy Metals

     It has been generally assumed that anaerobic processes
are unable to cope with waste streams containing toxicants and
therefore are unsuitable for treatment of many wastewaters.
                                1228

-------
Toxicants do alter the kinetic parameters of methanogens and
thus increase their generation time and decrease pollutant
removal efficiency.  However, these adverse effects can be off-
set by proper attention to solids retention time.  Proper
acclimation procedures can also increase the threshold concen-
tration of toxicants which cause inhibition.  The magnitude of
the toxic effect generated by a substance can be reduced sig-  \
nificantly if the concentration is increased slowly.  This
involves a process of acclimation which represents the adjust-
ment of the biological- population to the adverse effect of the
toxin.  The acclimation process in a mixed microbial popula-
tion may involve any or all of three mechanisms:  (1) mutation
of one or more species in the population; (2) selection of the
least sensitive species in the population; (3)  alteration of
the metabolism of one Or more species to overcome the metabolic
block produced by the toxic material.  All these mechanisms
may interact.  In any case, resistance to a toxic substance
often involves an increase in the concentration of the substance
which can be tolerated rather than acquisition of total
resistance to the substance at any level.  When the concentra-
tion of a toxic substance is increased slowly,  the microbial
population can acquire increased resistance through all of the
mechanisms available to it.  However, if a large concentration
of toxic material is introduced suddenly, the effects are quite
different than when the same concentration is reached after
an adequate series of acclimations because no time is allowed
for any of the available mechanisms to operate, and most of the
population will be destroyed.  In evaluating data from toxicity
studies for design purposes, the engineer should consider the
test conditions used and whether toxic materials may be intro-
duced into the waste stream to be treated as a slug dose of
high concentration or as a constant component to which a
population may become acclimated.  Speece, et al. (35) showed
that methanogenic bacteria could acclimate to toxicant con-
centrations that were 100 times greater than the concentra-
tions which caused inhibition of unacclimated cultures.  They
found that continuous, increments of nickel chloride could be
added to the feed of a filter with no adverse effect on gas
production.             An increase from 200 to 400 mg/1
decreased gas production but it resumed when nickel additions
were stopped.  They were able to acclimate the  filter to a
sulfide concentration of 1000 mg/1.  Long term acclimation of
                                122P

-------
 a filter to increasing levels  of continuous  sodium additions
 showed no adverse effect up to additions  of  7500  mg/1  as Na+.
 Formaldehyde added to the feed of the  anaerobic filter caused
 no inhibition of gas  production up to  400 mg/1.   Additionally
 they were able to acclimate the filter to 600 mg/1 of  acrylic
 acid and to acrolein  at a concentration of 100 mg/1.

      Parkin,  et al.  (36)  found that cyanide  and ammonia
 toxicity were fairly  reversible while  chloroform,  formalde-
 hyde and sulfide exhibited some irreversible toxicity.  Nickel
 showed signs of irreversible toxicity  depending on the concen-
 tration.           •

      The early warning of possible metal  toxicity is given by
 a gradual decrease in gas production and  an  increase of the
 effluent COD.   This can be anticipated if strict  attention is
 given to the influent wastewater so that  the operator  will
 know if inhibitory concentrations  of metal ions are entering
 the filter.

 KINETIC ASPECTS

      Because  of high  cell mass  concentration and  immobilization
 of cells  within the attached film,  the  substrate  utilization
 rates per unit volume of the biological reactor are high;
 displacement  of the culture  composing  the  film by  inactive cells
 in the influent to the  reactor  is  less  likely than  displacement
 of a  culture  in dispersed/suspended  growth,  and a  fixed-film
 reactor is  less susceptible  to  upset by shock loadings of sub-
 strate and/or toxic metals.

      As  a result  of these  advantages inherent in the attached-
 growth wastewater treatment  systems, many researchers have
 attempted to model growth  and substrate removal by biofilms.
 Earlier studies described  the removal kinetics in terms of sub-
 strate  concentration  existing in the bulk liquid phase.  Recent
 investigations  have generally described substrate removal
kinetics  in terms of  simulated  substrate concentrations in each
 layer of  the biofilm.  The response of the entire film is pre-
dicted by the  sum of  layers.  The most complete biofilm models
were developed by Williamson and McCarty  (37) and Dewalle and
Chian  (38) on  the basis of two competing mechanisms, diffusion
                                1230

-------
    (O
    5-
    13
    OO
                              Biofilm
                                   Interface
                            c  • •  • -   - - -    ., ,
                             -,  Unit  Surf ace'.;r
                            >V\ -Ar_.e-a,-.A   . '•;'.;
 Diffusion
 Limited

   Surface
   F1ux   '
                          |*- :;i."- >>/-.;;
                ...   .,       Ina'cf'ive
Substrate In   lActive Mass     Magg .
Bulk Solution  r[a^ Li   ^
               u_       Biofilm
                                  Lc
Figure 3.  Substrate  Concentration Profile  Within
           A Biofilm [ taken from Williamson  &
           McCarty  (37)]
                       1231

-------
 and metabolism.  Basically, all models considered mass trans-
 port from the bulk liquid to the biolayer by diffusion
 through a boundary layer of stagnant liquid covering the bio-
 layer.   (See Figure 3.)   Williamson and Mccarty's model is
 represented by a second-order,  non-linear ordinary differential
 equation.
       d2S
       dz
                   dS
             = - (-
                          X
                   dt
                                                          (2)
      The  equation states  that the  second derivative  of substrate
 concentration with respect to biofilm depth  z  is  directly re-
 lated to  the  utilization  rate of the  rate-limiting substrate
 (~  <3Sc/dt)  and biomass  concentration  (X) , but  is  inversely
 related to  the diffusion  'coefficient  (Dc) within  a biofilm.
 Additionally,  in  Eq.  2  it is  also  assumed that the rate of
 utilization of substrate  at any  depth  within the  biofilm  follows
the Monod relationship; that  is  -(dSc/dt) =  (qS  )/(K.
which q  is the maximum utilization rate of the rate-limiting
                                              Sc),
in
substrate
Sc and KS is the Monod half-velocity coefficient.
     This equation does not possess an explicit solution.
However, it^can be solved for the two limiting cases of the
Monod equation.  When the substrate concentration S  (at z = 0)
is much greater than the half-velocity concentration, K , Eq. 2
becomes a zero order kinetic equation:                 S
                    d2S
                    dz
                                                         (3)
                             D
and the biofilm substrate concentration (S )  can be computed by
using the equation given below:           c
                                     i
                          jX
     But, when S  is much less than K
order kinetic equation:              s
                            qxs.
                             >                  (4)

                             Eq.  2 becomes  a  first



                                               (5)
                                  1232

-------
     Under the above condition, the relationship between the
biofilm substrate concentration, S  , and the other controlling
parameters such as q, X, K  , L  , and z is defined as:
                          S   C
                 s  = s
                  ,c    s
         Cosh [(qX/D K )  (L -z)]
                    c s  •  c

         Cosh  (qX/D K )T L
                    OS    C
                           (6)
     Obviously, the problem  in using this biofilm model  is  the
need to determine the thickness of  the diffusional boundary
layer  (L ) and the values of maximum substrate  utilization
rate (q) and diffusion coefficient  (D ).  These are  difficult
to measure in a fixed-film biological system.

     Because of .these reasons, model modifications were  sug-
gested by DeWalle and Chian  (38) .   According to Pick's law
of molecular diffusion, the  mass transfer irate  (3M/3t)
through a surface area A is  proportional to  the concentration
gradient of the substrate at the interface:
                       3.M
                       3t
          = -AD
  as
  	c_
c 3.z
(7)
By substituting  the  term 3S  /3z  in Eq.  7  into the integrated
                           C
form of Eqs.  3 and 5 for a unit  cross-sectional area and at
z = L  , DeWalle  and  Chian were able to  define the. .rates of
•mass   transfer as follows:
and
     dM
     dt

      r~
             dM
             dt
= S
   b/
                               c
                                    if S »  K
                                       s      s
 if S  « K
     s     s
                           (8)
(9)
where  S,_ 'is' the  substrate  concentration in the bulk liquid.
L   in  Eq.  8 can  be  approximated using the equation proposed
by  Pirt  (39)  and Saunders  and Bazin (40)  :
                                1233

-------
                      L  =
                       C  v
                             2r> -
                               c
                               qX
                                         (10)
     Eq. 8 indicates that the rate of mass transfer is indepen-
dent of substrate concentration, but directly proportional to
the thickness of the biolayer (L ) and the concentration of
attached biomass (X).  If cell attachment is uniformly
distributed, the rate of substrate removal is also proportional
to the specific surface area of solid medium because Eq. 8 is
derived from a unit cross-sectional area.  More importantly,
Eq. 8 further indicates that at very high substrate concentra-
tion the rate of substrate removal is highly dependent upon
the specific surface area of solid medium within the system
due to the zero order kinetics of the reaction.  This is true
in particular when submerged filters are employed for the
treatment of high-strength organic wastes.

     Eq. 9 states that the rate of mass transfer is independent
of biofilm thickness, but directly proportional to the bulk
substrate concentration (S,) and the square root of the bio-
mass concentration (X).  Since for a given substrate, q, D ,
X, and K  are not expected to vary greatly, Eqs. 7 and 8 can
be reduced to :
                1  dM
V  dt
                              Sb
and
                1  dM      A
                V  dt   K2 v   b
                                         (11)
                                         (12)
where V is the reactor volume and A/V  is the specific surface
area in the reactor.  K^ and K_ are coefficients based on
zero and first order kinetics, respectively.

     The effects of effluent characteristics, specific surface
area and flow velocity on the substrate removal rate were dis-
cussed by the same investigators.  They concluded that : (a)  At
low substrate concentrations the removal rate as predicted by
Eq. 11 increased linearly with effluent concentration.  The
effluent concentrations have a finite value when the removal
                             1234

-------
 rate  approaches  zero.   On the  contrary,  at high  substrate  con-
 centrations  a satisfactory linear relationship was  not  obtained
 from  Eq.  11  when the  reciprocal  substrate  removal was plotted .
 versus  that  of the substrate concentration,  (b)  An  increase  in
 Kp  was  always observed as a result of increasing specific  sur-
 face  area although no definitive correlation between the rate
 of  substrate removal  and the value of the  increasing specific
 surface area could be established,  (c) The calculated K2  (V/A)
 values  appeared  to have a straight relation  with flow velocity
 when  plotted on  log-log paper. .This  means that  the rate of
 substrate removal can be improved by  minimizing  the diameter
 of  the  submerged filter column or maximizing the height of the
 column  in order,to obtain highar velocities.  Practically
 speaking, a  tall column has one  obvious  disadvantage, i.e.,
 a relatively larger volume in  the last portion of the.column
 is  in contact with a  low substrate concentration, which in
 turn  tends to reduce  the substrate removal rate.

      Kinetic models are presently not supported,  by  sufficient
 analytical data  and it is necessary that more  research  be
 done  in this area.                           ...

 SUMMARY                     -..-••

      The advantages inherent ,in  the anaerobic  filtration pro-
 cess  suggest that it  is worthy of consideration  as  a basis for
 full  scale waste treatment facilities.   The  fixed film
 anaerobic process is  well suited .to handling large  organic
 loads.   High COD removals can  be .achieved, particularly with
 high  strength wastes,  without  the high operating costs  that
 are associated with other treatment operations which use aera-
 tion  or physical-chemical methods.  Anaerobic  digesters also
 product a useable methane gas  which could.be used to heat  the
 reactors. The methane production is  almost  certain to  be  well
 in  excess of the necessary requirements  for  heating purposes
 and could possibly be used for additional  heating of the treat-
 ment  facility.  Research has shown that-the  filter .can  success-
 fully treat  many types of waste  efficiently.  More  quantitative
•data  from field  installations  and laboratory pilot  plants  are
 heeded  to establish design criteria for  this treatment  process.
                              1235

-------
REFERENCES
    McCa^ty, P.L.? "Anaerobic Treatment pf. Soluble Wastes,"
    Advances in Water Quality Improvement, The University of
    Texas Press, Austin, Texas, p. 336, 1968.
    Truesdale, G.A. et. al., "Journal Institute Public Health
    Engrs.," Vol. 60, p. 273, 1961.
    Coulter, J.B., Soneda, S., and Ettinger, M.B,,  "Anaerobic
    Contact Process for Sewage Disposal," Sewage Industrial
    Wastes, Vol. 29, p. 468, 1957.
    Witherow, J.L., Coulter, J.B., and Ettinger, M.D., "An-
    aerobic Contact Process for Treatment of Suburban Sew-
    age," Journal Sanitary Engineering Division ASCE, Vol. 84,
    1958.
    Winneberger, J.H., Menar, A.B., and McGauhey, P.H.,
    "A Study of Methods of Preventing Failure of Septic Tank
    Percolation Fields," Second Annual Report.  Sanitary
    Engineering Research Laboratory, University of California
    Berkeley, 1961.
    Young, J.C., and McCarty, P.L., "The Anaerobic Filter for
    Waste Treatment,"  Journal Water Pollution Control Federa-
    tion, Vol.  41,  R160, 1968.
    Ham,  R.K.,  and Boyle,  W.C.,  "The Treatability of  Leachate
    from Sanitary Landfills," Progress Report to the  Environ-
    mental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste Management
    Washington,  D.C.,  University of Wisconsin,  1971.
    Foree, E.G., and Reid,  V.M., "Anaerobic  Biological Stabili-
    zation of Sanitary Landfill Leachate," University of
    Kentucky,  Technical Report,  UKY TR 65-73-CE 17, 1973.
    Chian, E.S.K.,  and DeWalle,  F.B.,  "Treatment of High
    Strength Acidic Wastewater with a Completely Mixed Anaero-
    bic Filter," Water Research, Vol.  11,  p.  295, 1977.
    Plummer, A.  H.,  Malina, J.F., and Eckenfelder,  W.W.,  "Sta-
    bilization of a Low Solids Carbohydrate  Waste by  an Anaer-
    obic Filter," Proceedings 23rd Purdue  Industrial  Waste
    Conf., Purdue Univ., P. 467, 1968.
    Clark, R.H., and Speece,  R.E., "The pH Tolerance  of Anaer-
    obic Digestion," 5th International Water Pollution Research
    Conference,  1970.
    Pailthorp,  R.E., Richter, G.A., and Filbert, J.W., "Anaer-
    obic Secondary Treatment of Potato Process Wastewater,"
    presented at 44th WPCF Convention, San Francisco,  Oct., 197L
    Richter, G.A.,  and Mackie, J.A., "Low  Cost Treatment for
    High Strength Waste," Cornell, Rowland,  Hayes,  Merryfield,
    and Hill,  Consulting Engineers, Oct.  1971.
10.
11.
12.
13,
                              1236

-------
14.  Taylor, D.W.,  "Full Scale Anaerobic Trickling Filter
     Evaluation," Proceedings 3rd National Symposium of Food
     Processing Wastes, EPA Report R 2-72-018, Nov. 1972.
15.  Dorstall, K.A.,  "Centennial Mills Starch-Gluten Plant,
     Spokane Washington," unpublished report, EPA, Pacific
     Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory, Oct. 1974.
16.  Campbell, G.R. ^  Hydroscience, Inc., communication with
     John L. Mancini, 1973.
17.  El Shafie, A.T., and Bloodgood, D.E., "Anaerobic
     Treatment in a Multiple Upflow System," Journal Water
     Pollution Control Federation, Vol 45, p. 2345, 1973.
18.  Dennis, N.D.,  and Jennett, C.S., "Pharmaceutical Waste
     Treatment with an Anaerobic Filter," Proceedings 29th
     Purdue Industrial Waste Conf., Purdue Univ., 1974.
19.  Wilson, A.W.,  and Timpany, P.L., "Anaerobic Contact
     Filter for Treatment of Waste Sulphite Liquor,"
     presented at the 59th Annual Meeting of the Canadian
     Pulp and Paper Association, Montreal, Quebec, Jan. 1973.
20.  Hovius, J.C.,  Fisher, J.A., and Conway, K.A., "Anaerobic
     Treatment of Synthetic Organic Wastes," EPA Report, Pro-
     ject 12020 Dis., Jan. 1972.
21.  Foree, E.G.,  and Horsley, E.E., "Advanced Studies of
     the Submerged Anaerobic Filter for Brewery Press Liquor
     Stabilization," Technical Report UKY 48-72-CE-14,
     University of Kentucky, 1972.
22.  Tadman, J.M.,  Dow Chemical, personal communication with
     James Mueller, 1973.
23.  Chian, E.S.K., and DeWalle, F.B., "Evaluation of Leach-
     ate Treatment; Vol. 1:  Characterization of Leachate,"
     Environmental Protection Technology Series, EPA-600/
     2-77-186a, Sept. 1977.
24.  Khan, A.N., and Siddiqi, R.H,, "Wastewater Treatment by
     Anaerobic Contact Filter," Journal Environmental Engi-
     neering Division, ASCE, EE2, p. 102, 1976.
25.  Haug, R.T., "Anaerobic Filter Treats Waste," Water and
     Sewage Works, Feb. 1977.
26.  Hakannson, H. et. al., "Anaerobic Treatment of"Whey;and
     Whey Permeate in Submerged Filters," Inst. Vatten^-
     Luftuardsforsl, Pub. B, 4Q6,:.1977.
27.  Switzenbaum, M.S., "Anaerobic Expanded  Bed Treatment of
     Wastewater,"  Proceedings of  the Seminar/Workshop on
     Anaerobic Filters.  Howey-In
-------
     rial Waste  Conf.,  1979.
 29.  Donovan,  E.J.,  "Treatment  of High  Strength Wastes by an
     Anaerobic Filter," Proceedings of  the  Seminar/Workshop
     on Anaerobic Filters. Howey-In-Hills,  Florida, 1980.
 30.  Arora, H.C., Chattopadhya,  S.N., and Routh, T.,  "Treat-
     ment of Vegetable  Tanning  Effluent by  the Anaerobic
     Contact Filter  Process," Journal Water Pollution Control
     Federation, p.  584, 1975.  (G.B.)
 31.  Jewell, W.J., Switzenbaum,  M.S., and Morris, J.W.,
     "Municipal Wastewater Treatment with the Anaerobic At-
     tached Microbial Film Expanded Bed Process," Journal
     Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 53, p.  482,
     1981.
 32.  Rudgal, H.T., "Effect of Copper Bearing Wastes on Sludge
     Digestion," Sewage Works Journal, Vol. 18, p. 1130,
     1946.
 33.  Chian, E.S.K.,  DeWalle, F.B., and Brush, J., "Heavy
     Metal Removal with Completely Mixed Anaerobic Filter,"
     Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 51,
     p. 22, 1979.
 34.  Young, J.C., "Performance of Anaerobic Filters Under
     Transient Loading  and Operating Conditions," Proceedings
     of the Seminar/Workshop on Anaerobic Filters. Howey-In-
     The-Hills, Florida, 1980.
 35.  Speece, R.E. et. al., "Metane Fermentation Toxicity
     Response," Proceedings of the Seminar/Workshop pn Anaer-
     obic Filters, Howey-In-The-Hills, Florida, 1980.
 36.  Parkin, G.F., Speece, R.E., and Yang, C.H., "A Comparison
     of the Response of Methanogens to Toxicants:  Anaerobic
     Filter vs Suspended Growth Systems," Proceedings of the
     Seminar/Workshop.  Howey-In-The-Hills, Florida,  1980.  .
 37.  Williamson,  K., and McCarty, P.L.,  "A Model of Substrate
     Utilization by Bacterial Films," Journal of Water Pollu-
     tion Control Federation, Vol.  48, p.  9, 1976.
 38.  DeWalle,  F.B.,  and Chian, E.S.K., "Kinetics of Substrate
     Removal in a Completely Mixed Anaerobic Filter," Bio-
     technology and Bioengineering,  Vol. 18, p. 1275,  1976.
39.  Pirt,  S.J.,  J.  Appl.  Chem.  Biotechnol., Vol. 23,  p,  389,
     1973.
40,  Saunders,  P.T., and Bazin,  M,J.,  J. Appl.  Chem,  Bio-
     technol.,  Vol.  23,  p.  847,  1973.
                            1238

-------

-------

-------

-------

-------