United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
                       540R04505
The Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation
Program

Annual Report to Congress
FY 2002
        SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE
        TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION

-------

-------
                                               EPA/540/R-04/505
                                                   August 2004
The Superfund Innovative Technology
           Evaluation Program
        Annual Report to Congress
                   FY2002
            Office of Research and Development
           U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                Washington, DC 20460
                                        Recycled/Recyclable
                                        Printed with vegetable-based ink on
                                        paper that contains a minimum of
                                        50% post-consumer fiber content
                                        processed chlorine free.

-------
                                       Notice

       The U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency, through its  Office  of Research  and
Development, partially funded and collaborated in the research described here under our contract
No. 68-C-OO-186 to Environmental Quality Management, Inc. It has been subjected to the Agency's
peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document.
Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation
for use.

-------
                                      Foreword
       The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is charged by Congress with protecting
the Nation's land, air, and water resources. Under a mandate of national environmental laws, the
Agency strives to formulate and implement actions leading to a compatible balance between human
activities and the ability of natural systems to support and nurture life. To meet this mandate, EPA's
research program is providing data and technical support for solving environmental problems today
and building a science knowledge base necessary to manage our ecological resources wisely,
understand how pollutants affect our health, and prevent or reduce environmental risks in the future.

       The National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL) is the Agency's center for
investigation of technological and management approaches for preventing and reducing risks from
pollution that threaten human health and the environment. The focus of the Laboratory's research
program is on methods and their cost-effectiveness for prevention and control of pollution to air,
land, water, and  subsurface resources; protection of water quality  in public water systems;
remediation of contaminated sites, sediments and ground water; prevention and control of indoor
air pollution; and restoration of ecosystems. NRMRL collaborates with both public and private
sector partners to foster technologies that reduce the cost of compliance and to anticipate emerging
problems.  NRMRL's research provides solutions to environmental problems by: developing and
promoting technologies that protect and improve the environment; advancing scientific and
engineering information to support regulatory and policy decisions; and providing the technical
support and information transfer to ensure implementation of environmental regulations and
strategies at the national, state, and community levels.

       This publication has been produced as part of the Laboratory's strategic long-term research
plan. It is published and made available by EPA's Office of Research and Development to assist the
user community and to link researchers with their clients.
                                        Lawrence W. Reiter, Acting Director
                                        National Risk Management Research Laboratory
                                          in

-------

-------
                                     Contents

Section                                                                          Page

Notice	 ii
Foreword  	iii
Figures and Tables	vi
Acronyms	  vii
Executive Summary	viii

SITE Program Description	1
      Introduction  	1
      Program Principles	2
      Program Planning	2
      Program Implementation	2
      Matching Priority Sites with Innovative Cleanup Solutions	2
      Technology Field Demonstrations	4
      Information Dissemination  	4

FY 02 SITE Program Cost Savings and Vendor Benefits	5
      Promotion of Innovative Technologies 	5
      Cumulative Program Cost Savings, Incremental Program Cost Savings,
      and Vendor Contracting	6
      SITE Program Accomplishments - Federal Cost Savings from RODs Analysis  	6
      Incremental Cost Savings  	8
      Historical Vendor Benefits  	10
      Innovative Technology Highlights - - SITE Program Case Studies 	13

FY 02 Progress and Accomplishments  	16
      Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Program 	16
      Ongoing Demonstrations	17

Future Direction	21
      Introduction  	21
      Technology Areas of Primary Interest	22
      MMT Program Areas of Interest	24
      Partnerships for Success 	24
      Information Transfer 	26
      Conclusions  	26

Appendices

A - SITE Projects (Alphabetically by Developer State)
B - SITE Technology Demonstration Sites (Alphabetically by Demonstration Site State)
C - Electronic Technical Information Resources
D - Glossary of Remediation Technologies

-------
                                      Figures

Number                                                                         Page

1      SITE Program Funding History	3

2      Superfund remedial actions: in situ technologies for source control	7

3      Cost savings estimated from RODs analysis by technology type	9

4      Categorization of contracts awarded to SITE vendors following program participation  11

5      Total number of contracts awarded to SITE vendors after program participation  	12

6      Share of 3,507 total contracts awarded to SITE demonstration vendors by
       technology type  	12

7      History of Ex situ vs In situ Distribution of SITE Demonstration Projects  	18
                                       Tables

Number                                                                         Page

1      SITE Demonstration Projects Completed FY 02	18

2      SITE Ongoing Projects in FY 02	19

3      Future Contaminant Emphasis Areas 2003-2007  	23

4      SITE Program Projects FY 03	23
                                          VI

-------
                                   Acronyms

ANSI/ASQC        American National Standard Institute, Assistance for Environmental Data
                   Collection and Environmental Technology Programs
DNAPL            Dense non-aqueous phase liquids
DOD               Department of Defense
DOE               Department of Energy
ECOS              Environmental Council of States
EPA               Environmental Protection Agency
ESTCP             Environmental Security and Technology Certification Program
ETV               Environmental Technologies Verification
FY                Fiscal year
GPR               Ground penetrating radar
IDC               Interagency DNAPL Consortium
ITRC               Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council
MHI               Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
MMT              Monitoring and Measurement Technologies
NELP              Navy Environmental Leadership Program
NPL               National Priorities List
NRC               National Research Council
ORD               Office of Research and Development
PAHs              Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
PCBs               Polychlorinated biphenyls
REACHIT          Remediation Characterization Innovative Technologies
RCI               White House Rapid Commercialization Initiative
SITE               Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
TIP                Technology Innovation Program
TPH               Total petroleum hydrocarbon
VOC               Volatile Organic Compound
                                        vn

-------
                                Executive Summary
       The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program has successfully
promoted the development, commercialization and implementation of innovative hazardous waste
treatment technologies for 16 years.  SITE offers a mechanism for conducting joint  technology
demonstration and evaluation projects at hazardous waste sites involving the private sector, EPA,
and other federal and state agencies. The program provides environmental decision-makers  with
relevant data on new, viable remediation technologies that may have performance or cost advantages
compared to conventional treatment technologies. Since the initiation of the SITE Program in 1986,
cleanup of contaminated sites through the use of innovative technologies has resulted in a potential
total inflated cost savings of over $2.7 billion.

       The SITE Program focuses on the remediation needs of the hazardous waste remediation
community through program planning; matching priority sites with innovative cleanup solutions;
technology field demonstrations; and information dissemination. The SITE Program's vision is to
remain the  premier organization in enhancing the credibility and implementation of effective
innovative remediation options.

       The SITE Program continues to earn recognition as a leader in advancing innovative
technology development and commercialization. The program is participating with 149 remediation
technology vendors.   Through FY 02, the SITE  Program has  successfully demonstrated 143
technologies,  6 of which were demonstrated during FY 02.  Field monitoring and measurement
technologies for mercury and dioxin in soil and sediment demonstrations were initiated in 2002 as
part of the SITE Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Program. Emphasis formerly placed
on technologies requiring the removal of soil or groundwater  (ex situ) has gravitated nearly
exclusively to in situ technologies that treat contamination in place.

       Information obtained annually from SITE Program vendors demonstrates the increased
acceptance  of innovative technologies. These vendors have received an increased share of their
specific technology markets as a direct result of their involvement in the SITE Program.
Cumulatively, through 2002, contracts for over 2,100 cleanups, nearly 1,400 treatability studies,
and 4,200 measurement/monitoring units have been received by these vendors following
demonstrations.

       To ensure that the program continues to meet the needs of the remediation community, the
SITE Program established a remediation stakeholder group. This group, which is composed of such
agencies as EPA, the Department of Defense,  and the Department of Energy, reviews innovative
technology applications and develops an environmental emphasis area list, which ensures that the
most pressing issues are prioritized and addressed.
                                          vin

-------
                              SITE Program Description
Introduction

       The  SITE Program is composed of a
Demonstration  Program,  a  Monitoring  and
Measurement Technology (MMT) Program, and
information transfer.  SITE offers a mechanism
for conducting joint  technology demonstration
and evaluation projects at hazardous waste sites
through the involvement of the  private sector,
EPA, and other federal and state agencies.   A
description of each program is listed below.
  S Demonstration Program
  Evaluates and verifies performance and reports
  cost of promising innovative technologies at
  selected hazardous waste sites to provide reliable
  performance, cost, and applicability information
  for site cleanup decision-making

  S Monitoring and Measurement
    Technologies Program
  Evaluates technologies that detect, monitor, and
  measure hazardous and toxic substances to
  provide more cost-effective and accurate methods
  for producing real-time data during site
  characterization and remediation

  S Information Transfer Activities
  Disseminates technical information, including
  engineering, performance, and cost data, to assist
  in removing barriers for use of innovative and
  alternative technologies
       The  Demonstration  Program  is  the
flagship of the SITE Program. Its objective is to
conduct field demonstrations and high-quality
performance verifications of viable remediation
technologies at sites that pose  high risks  to
human  health and/or  the  environment,  are
common throughout a region or the nation, or
where  existing   remediation  methods   are
inadequate, unsafe, or too costly.  The SITE
Program solicits applications annually from
those responsible for cleanup operations at
hazardous  waste sites.  A panel of SITE
Program scientists, engineers, and associated
environmental  experts   reviews   the
applications to identify those technologies
that best represent solutions  for the most
pressing environmental problems.   The
resulting data and reports  are intended for
use   by   decision-makers  in  selecting
remediation  options  and  for  increasing
credibility  in innovative applications.

       The Demonstration  Program  has
participated with a total of 149 remediation
technology vendors.  Four applications for
participation in the Demonstration Program
were received in  response  to  the 2002
solicitation. The program typically receives
10 to 20 applications annually.

       The SITE Program has successfully
demonstrated 143 technologies, including 6
during FY 02.  Recognizing the need for a
shift from  ex situ remediation, eight of the
Program's  eleven ongoing demonstrations
are in-situ technologies. SITE'S Monitoring
and  Measuring  Technologies   (MMT)
Program has completed 45 projects to date,
with 2 more ongoing.
   The foundation of the SITE Program is
   providing credible cost and performance
   data.
                                             1

-------
Program Principles

       The SITE Program is defined by the
following four operating principles: (1) program
planning,  (2) matching priority  sites  with
innovative  cleanup  solutions, (3)  technology
field  demonstrations,  and  (4)  information
dissemination.

Program Planning

       SITE Program direction and strategies are
evaluated each year based on input from the user
community and other private- and public-sector
stakeholders to ensure that the program continues
to focus on validating the most  sought-after
remediation technologies. As part of the overall
program planning process, the SITE Program has
developed  and  is  implementing  a  quality
management plan based on American National
Standard Institute, Specifications and Guidelines
for Quality Assistance for Environmental Data
Collection  and  Environmental  Technology
Programs (ANSI/ASQC E4). The Site Quality
Management Plan will document the EPA SITE
Program quality system and will encompass the
management and technical activities necessary to
plan,  implement,  and  assess    the  quality
assurance and quality control operations applied
to all SITE Projects. The Quality management
plan will document the requirement for Quality
Assurance Project Plans for all SITE Evaluation
Projects. SITE Quality Assurance Project Plans
are currently developed at a level that supports
the development of environmental  regulations
and standards (Category II). It is important that
the SITE Program quality requirements are met
during planning, implementation and reporting of
SITE demonstrations, and evaluations.

Program Implementation

       The SITE Program was established under
section  209(b) of the Superfund Amendments
and  Reauthorization  Act  (SARA)  (Section
311(b) of CERCLA, as amended)  to evaluate
technologies  for the treatment of hazardous
waste.  Support for the SITE program is part of
the Agency's base  Superfund  Research
Program budget. Resources to support SITE
are provided by Congress via the Agency's
Superfund appropriation. Figure 1 shows the
SITE Program annual budget since 1997.

       The SITE Program is a partnership
between the  public  and  private sectors,
where  the  costs and responsibilities are
shared by EPA, hazardous waste site owners,
and technology developers. EPA enters into
cooperative arrangements with site owners
and technology developers, under  which
innovative technologies are demonstrated at
selected  hazardous  waste  sites.    EPA
evaluates the new technologies based on the
demonstration results,  and compiles and
publishes rigorous engineering, performance,
and cost data intended to aid in decisions
regarding the use of the technologies at other
hazardous  waste   sites.    The program
generates credible and unbiased technology
cost  and performance  data needed by
remedial project managers., consultants, and
other environmental decision makers. EPA
promotes easy and rapid  access to this
information, allowing project managers to
make timely decisions in selecting cleanup
remedies.

Matching Priority Sites with Innovative
Cleanup Solutions

       The  SITE  Program  solicits and
prioritizes hazardous waste sites, and then
seeks   appropriate   technologies  for
demonstration at these sites. Priority sites
are selected based on feedback from the user
community, including  federal  and state
agencies. Matching a site with a technology
is a flexible process, and a site owner has the
option  of evaluating multiple technologies.
If no  specific  technology  or  vendor is
identified by a site, technologies and vendors
are matched by the SITE Program and other
interested parties, which may include state
and federal regulators  and other  public
representatives.

-------
$0.0
          FY97
                        FY98
                                                                  FY01
                                                           Fiscal Year




                                         Figure 1. SITE Program Funding History
                                                                                FY02
                                                                                              FY03
                                                                                                            FY04

-------
The selection of sites for the program is
based on the research needs of EPA, as
well as federal and state agencies.
       An important aspect of technology
selection is that more than one technology
may  be   introduced   for  review  and
demonstration.   This   aspect  allows  for
matching the most appropriate and feasible
technology to  a  particular  site.   General
technology needs of the user community are
identified by soliciting  input from working
groups, forums,  personal communication,
and hazardous waste publications. With this
continuous input, the SITE Program will
continue to  focus on  the  needs of the
remediation  community  and  the  more
pressing problems at contaminated sites.

Technology Field Demonstrations

       SITE    Program    technology
demonstrations are increasingly conducted in
partnership with  other  EPA offices,  other
federal agencies, states, private industry, and
universities. These partnerships reduce the
overall  costs of demonstrations to  EPA,
accelerate remediation of some of the most
problematic  sites at  federal  and   state
facilities,  and  significantly subsidize  the
technology vendors via site/logistical costs.
One example of interagency partnerships is
with DOD, Navy at Pearl  Harbor.   This
group   is  currently   working  on  a
demonstration  evaluating technologies  to
remediate DNAPL at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.

       Innovative  remediation   and
monitoring/measurement  technology
demonstration  projects  are presented by
developer state and by  demonstration site
state in Appendices A and B, respectively.

Information Dissemination

       Electronic documents are accessible
through the Internet at the SITE Program
web page (http://www.epa.gov/ORD/SlTE),
Environmental  Technologies  Verification
(ETV) web site (http://www.epa.gov/etv/),
and a site supported by the EPA Office of
Solid  Waste  and  Emergency  Response
Technology  Innovation   Program   (TIP)
(http://clu-in.org).     Several  technology
databases  and  publications  summarize
information  about  innovative  treatment
technologies and associated vendors, and are
useful  tools   in   identifying  potential
technology  demonstration candidates  or
serve as directories for technology vendors.
SITE   Program   and   other   federal
demonstrations are also  documented  in
Innovative Remediation Technologies: Field
Scale  Demonstration   Projects  in  North
America,    2nd    Edition
(http://cluin. or/products/nairt). Descriptions
of  selected  databases  and  publication
ordering  information  are  provided  in
Appendix C.

       The following mechanisms are  used
by  the  SITE  Program  to  disseminate
information and increase interaction with the
user community:

   Program-specific brochures and exhibits

   Conferences, workshops, and technical
   working groups

   Publications and videotapes (accessible
   on the Internet: http://www.epa.gov/
   ORD/SITE/document.html)

   Hard copies available from EPA's
   National Center for Environmental
   Publications, 513-569-8190 or 1-800-
   490-9192

   Electronic media, including the Internet

   Technical assistance to regions, states,
   and remediation contractors

   Technology seminars

-------
            FY 02 SITE Program Cost Savings and Vendor Benefits
Promotion of Innovative Technologies

       SITE is recognized by EPA as one of
its principal programs to advance innovative
site monitoring, characterization, and cleanup
technologies  with  the  potential  to  treat
hazardous  wastes  more  efficiently,   less
expensively, and more safely than existing
methods. S ITE's mission i s to promote the
development  and  application  of innovative
technologies that reduce or eliminate risks to
human health and the  environment due to
contamination. The goal of the program is to
interact with the technology user community,
understand its needs, integrate those needs
with   EPA's  research  mission,   and
expeditiously  address  those   needs.
Identifying and responding to the technology
needs o f the remediation c ommunity i s the
driving force behind today's SITE Program.
 Responding to technology needs is the
 driving force behind the SITE Program.

       The need for credible and reliable data
for innovative  technologies  is significant.
Often, Records of Decision (RODs—official
records documenting selection of Superfund
site cleanup methods) indicate that innovative
technologies were not chosen due to a lack of
verified performance and implementability.
The SITE Program serves to fill this need for
credible e valuations sot hat m ore effective,
cost-efficient methods  can  be  used on
remediation problems.

       The types and numbers of innovative
technologies  selected  for  remediation at
Superfund sites increased significantly after the
passage of  the Superfund  Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA).   Since then, the
number has continued to rise, indicating increased
credibility  and  confidence  in  a  number  of
innovative treatment technologies.

       During the first 12 years of the SITE
Program, an emphasis was placed on innovative
technologies for permanent treatment that usually
required  the  removal  (ex  situ)  of  soil  or
groundwater. Most field demonstrations during
this period in the program's history involved ex
situ physical/chemical and thermal technologies
that could be field tested in a matter of days or
weeks. In the last several years, the very nature of
ex situ technologies, which typically involve the
excavation of contaminated soil or removal b y
pumping  of  groundwater,  and  subsequent
treatment and/or transport/disposal have become
increasingly limited in their applicability. These
cost/technical/political related limitations include:

•  Complex  contamination   and  subsurface
   matrices which are not amenable to removal

•  Mega sites whose shear expanse and volume
   of  contaminated  media preclude  ex situ
   technologies from consideration

   Lack of approved landfills in close proximity
   for excavation/transportation/disposal to  be
   cost-effective

       As a result,  in situ  technologies  are
increasingly the only alternative.  The need for
innovative, in situ technologies that are more cost-
effective, result in less secondary waste, and are
less intrusive will continue to increase. The SITE
Program has  recognized  this  need  and has

-------
emphasized  the  development  of in  situ
technologies.
SITE Program Accomplishments - Federal Cost
Savings from RODs Analysis
       Figure 2 presents the number of in situ
technologies as a percentage of all treatment
technologies for source control by fiscal year.
Over time, use of in situ technologies has
been increasing, as the trendline in Figure 1
shows.  A five-year moving average of the
percentage of in situ treatment technologies
shows  a generally steady increase from  28
percent  (FY1985-1988)  to  50  percent
(FY1999-2002). Several factors may play a
role in this upward trend in the use of in situ
treatment  technologies.   Because in situ
technologies require no excavation, risk from
exposure to contaminated media is reduced,
compared with levels of risk associated with
technologies that do require excavation. Also,
in situ technologies typically are much less
harsh on the natural habitat/environment than
ex situ technologies.  Further, for large sites
where excavation  and materials handling  for
ex situ technologies can be expensive, in situ
technologies are often more cost-effective.

Cumulative  Program  Cost   Savings,
Incremental Program Cost Savings, and
Vendor Contracting

       Since its establishment in  1986, the
SITE Program has assisted in the development
and use of innovative technologies, resulting
in substantial  cost savings for cleaning  up
contaminated sites. The cost savings realized
at Superfund  sites has been estimated  by
analysis of RODs from  1993  -  2000; this
estimating technique and analytical results  are
described   below.     The  SITE
Program  has  also  assisted  vendors  in
advancing innovative technologies from  the
development phase to full-scale application,
and has promoted greater acceptance of these
technologies.  The following  subsections
provide examples of the financial success of
the SITE Program in terms of cumulative and
incremental  federal cost savings and vendor
successes.
       Since   1993,  the  use  of  innovative
technologies has substantially increased, resulting
in dramatic cost savings.  During  1996,  1999,
2000,  2001,   and 2002,  the SITE  Program
collected information from signed RODs in all 10
EPA  Regions that  selected  an  innovative
technology as the  remedy. Up until 2001, these
technologies  included  soil  vapor  extraction,
thermal   desorption,   bioremediation,
phytoremediation, surfactant flooding, and many
other technologies that have passed through the
Program.   The  data  compiled  by  the  SITE
Program allowed environmental  managers  to
compare innovative technologies to conventional
technologies, particularly  the data from the total
of  204  RODs   that   selected   innovative
technologies for part or all of the remediation.

       Many  of  the  innovative  technologies
which  performed successfully  in their  SITE
Program demonstration(s) also enjoyed success in
their full-scale applications  at  Superfund and
other contaminated sites throughout the U.S. and
abroad. The use of soil vapor extraction (SVE),
for example, which is often employed in tandem
with air sparging to remediate the unsaturated
zone of contaminated soil, has increased steadily
from the late 1980's, particularly after multiple
successful SITE Program  demonstrations.

       The  process  for  selecting  innovative
technologies  for  demonstration in  the  SITE
Program and for deciding when these innovative
technologies  have  become  conventional
technologies consists of the following:

•      Consultation and review with:
       -EPA Regions
       —EPA Program Offices
       —State Regulatory Agencies
       [including the Interstate Technology and
       Regulatory Council (ITRC)]
•      Volume of use ($ and total units) as it
       relates to consulting firms utilizing these
       technologies

-------
IS
o
01
o
O
o
3
O
V)
3
V)
JC
"o

-------
   traditional  technologies  (e.g.,  in situ
   bioremediation  over  ex  situ  thermal
   desorption)
•  Assessment of the adequacy of the cost
   information in the identified RODs for
   both the innovative technology  selected
   and  the  traditional  technology(ies)
   considered but rejected
•  Calculating the estimated cost difference
   (+  or -) between  the  innovative and
   traditional alternative technology(ies)
•  Annualizing  resulting  estimated  cost
   savings to present day value
•  Subtracting  out  cost of SITE Program
   (does not include cost to site owners or
   vendors)

       Potential cost savings from the use of
innovative  technologies for the 105 RODs
was estimated at $2.7 billion in 2002 dollars,
with a potential average percent savings per
site of 71 percent. Only 14 of the 105 RODs
reported that the innovative technology was
more  expensive  than  or  equal  to  the
established technology.

       To   estimate  SITE   Program  net
benefits,  the FY 93-00 RODs and the SITE
Program budget were adjusted for inflation to
end of 2002 dollars using Consumer Price
Index  (CPI) inflation  figures.   The  total
inflation-adjusted potential c ost s avings for
RODs dated 1993-2000 was $2.7 billion, and
the total inflated SITE Program budget from
1986-2000  was   $181  million.     This
comparison represents an estimated inflated
potential cost savings of over $2.5 billion for
various site cleanups.

       Figure  3  shows  a breakdown  of
savings by technology type.   Soil  vapor
extraction (SVE), which was not considered
an  innovative  technology  by  the  SITE
Program for the first time in 2002, showed the
highest potential savings of over $1.25 billion,
followed by $585 million for bioremediation.
SVE was  one of  the initial technologies
accepted into the SITE Program (in the late
1980s), and large savings would therefore be
expected from this  technology.   Solvent
extraction,   thermal   desorption,   and
vitrification each accounted for  over $100
million in potential savings. Phytoremediation
and permeable reactive barriers  are  newer
technologies that are beginning to be chosen
in RODs, with  six and four sites having
specified their use,  respectively,  with an
associated potential  cost savings of $79
million   as   compared  to  conventional
technologies.    The  number of  sites and
associated  potential   costs  savings  for
phytoremediation and treatment barrier sites
are expected to increase rapidly  in coming
years.

Incremental Cost Savings

       To assess the current impact  of the
SITE program, EPA is developing a method
to estimate incremental cost  savings.  The
method  will be applied on a bi-annual basis
for even years (2000, 2002,  2004, etc.) to
coincide with the availability of RODs data.
Using a preliminary approach, RODs data
from FY2000 were evaluated. Twelve ROD
sites    selected   innovative  remedial
technologies   including   enhanced
flushing/chemical   oxidation,
phytoremediation, and LNAPL recovery by
dual-phase extraction.

       Excluded from consideration were the
innovative technologies discussed earlier in
this  section  which  are  now  considered
conventional (air sparging, SVE, etc.).  Seven
of these sites had sufficient cost data for both
innovative and conventional technologies to
make cost  comparisons.   Potential  cost
savings  from  the   use  of   innovative
technologies for these seven RODs (Figure 3)
were estimated at $95  million (inflated to
2000 dollars) with a potential average per site
savings of 47.5%. Only one of the 7  RODs
reported that the innovative technology was
more   expensive than   or  equal  to  the
established technology.  The SITE Program
budget  for  FY2000  was   $6.2  million,
indicating an estimated inflation-adjusted

-------
        Ex Situ Thermal
         Desorption
        15 sites ($160)
     Solvent Extraction
       2 sites ($127)
      Air Sparging
      8 sites ($75)
 Treatment Barrier
    4 sites ($59)
Phytoremediation
  5 sites ($22)
 Vitrification
2 sites ($164)-]
                                          Bio remediation
                                          29 sites ($585)
                                                                                           Bioremediation
                                                                                            2 sites ($66)
                        Soil Vapor Extraction
                          36 sites ($1,265)
                             Cumulative Cost Savings
        Savings estimates based on comparison of innovative and conventional technologies for
             FY 93-00 RODs. Savings shared equally among technologies when multiple
              technologies were used and technology-specific costs were not available.
                                                                                 Physical-Chemical
                                                                                    3 sites ($27)
                                                                                   Incremental  Cost Savings
         Other
       1 site ($2.5)
Phytoremediation
   1 site ($4.6)
                                                                          Savings estimates based on comparison of innovative and
                                                                                conventional technologies for FY-00 RODs.
                                      Figure 3. Cost savings estimated from RODs analysis by technology type
                                                               (millions of 2002 dollars)

-------
potential cost savings of $88 million for the
seven RODs sites remediated by innovative
technologies in 2000.

Historical Vendor Benefits

       Technology vendors are a central part
of the SITE Program, providing remediation
services for sites requiring cleanup solutions.
As part of the SITE Program, vendors provide
historical  information  on jobs  they  have
performed  for the technologies they  have
demonstrated.  Vendors experience various
benefits by participating in the SITE Program,
namely  increased  exposure,  market  share,
technical   acceptance,  and  recognition.
Increased   acceptance  of  innovative
technologies is demonstrated by the level of
commercial activity  experienced by  SITE
Program vendors.  For example, cumulative
information reported in 2002 indicates that
since  completing  SITE  demonstration
projects, vendors have received contracts for
2,119 cleanups and 1,388 treatability studies
(Figure 4).

       As part of an  ongoing  SITE Program
evaluation initiated in 1989, 87 vendors have
provided information regarding sales of their
technologies.  Following participation in the
SITE Program, 63 percent of the responding
vendors were awarded remediation  contracts
using technologies demonstrated in  the SITE
Program. Thirty-four percent of the reporting
vendors  have been  awarded ten  or  more
contracts each. Over 35 percent reported one
or more international contracts, identifying 40
countries where jobs were contracted. Figure
5 provides a historical perspective of growth
in the number of contracts awarded to SITE
vendors from 1990 to 2002.

       The 2002  Demonstration  Program
vendor information has been broken down by
technology   type   to   ascertain  which
technologies  demonstrated  the  greatest
commercial success.   Figure 6 shows the
share  by  technology  type  of the   3,507
remediation and treatability contracts awarded
to vendors. It is clear from this chart that soil
vapor   extraction  and  bioremediation
technologies have had the most commercial
success; in particular, soil vapor extraction can
no  longer  be  considered   an   innovative
technology, as discussed earlier in this section.

       This trend from the vendor information
is consistent with the RODs analysis results
which were shown in Figure 2, providing two
sources of data  to  confirm  the outstanding
commercial success of the technologies.
       In addition to the 87 Demonstration
 "Our involvement with the SITE Program has
 been very successful. We appreciate
 everyone's efforts and the program's agenda."

          Scott Larsen, STC Remediation, Inc.
             (Chemical Fixation/Solidification
                              Technologies)
Program vendors, information was  obtained
from   1999-2002  from   18  vendors  that
participated in the MMT Program.   This
information clearly demonstrated the benefits
that vendors  receive  from  the  program,
indicating that 73 percent of the vendors sold
more than 25 units since their  demonstration
in the SITE Program.  Over 60 percent of the
vendors indicated that their technologies were
used on international remediation projects. In
total, the MMT vendors reported selling over
4,200  units  on 1,043  jobs,  including  56
international jobs.

       Overall, vendor information shows that
SITE   technology   developers  in  the
Demonstration  and  MMT  Programs are
achieving  commercial   success  for
demonstrated technologies. The impact of the
SITE Program continues to be significant, as
illustrated by the volume of vendor  contracts
over the last decade (Figure 5).
                                           10

-------
     3500
     3000
     2500
     2000
     1500
     1000
      500
                    1210
             Treatabilityaudies
                                        1729
                                                           250
Remediation Jobs       International Contracts
                                                                              3189
TotaUobs
                                                                                        • Superfund
                                                                                        B Corrrrercial
Figure 4. Categorization of contracts awarded to SITE vendors following program participation.
                                 (Source: 2002 vendor information)
                                                  11

-------
 4000
                                                                            3507

3000
•3 ^
S 2500 ,
4 '
| 2000 -1
o i
U
« 1500 -:
[S :
1000 -
500 H
150 225
1990 1991







410
I
1992







533
n
1
1994



1895

-"„ '"*


'•*"''
1996











2874

,

.,:.;,'.



1998










3229
''••/•
.<


V;
it


2000












f. - '

- ":»
j
> \,
',?-!
• s*
2002










Figure 5. Total Number of contracts award to SITE vendors after program participation
                       (Source:  1990-2002 vendor information)
             Stabilization/
             Solidification-
                 18%
             Solvent Extraction
                   2%
                                    Soil Washing   Other
                                        2%        1%
Vitrification
   2%
            Oxidation
              2%
            Electro-chemical
                  1%
                         Phytoextraction
                             1%
           Hydraulic/
           Pneumatic
           Fracturing
              8%
                               Thermal
                              Desorption
                                 3%
Chemical
Treatment
   8%
                                        Soil Vapor
                                         Extraction
                                           25%
                                       Bioremediation
                                           21%
   Figure 6.  Share of 3,507 total contracts awarded to SITE Demonstration vendors by
                                    technology type
                        (Source: 1990-2002 vendor information)
                                          12

-------
Innovative Technology Highlights - - SITE
Program Case Studies

       This section presents case studies of
innovative  remediation  technologies  for
vendors that have  participated in  the SITE
Program.   The case studies provide  brief
descriptions  on  the   use  and  status  of
representative  technologies   and,  where
available, general information on the cost of
applying each technology. It is typical of the
SITE Program and  represents  the SITE
Program's approach to promoting innovative
technologies by identifying user needs.  In
response to user needs, the SITE Program
assessed the performance of a glass furnace
technology for dredged sediments, a hydrogen
release technology  for organic contaminants,
and steam enhanced remediation.
  "The U.S. Navy has been using the in-
  field total hydrocarbon petroleum
  analyzer of one of the vendors who
  participated in SITE'S Measurement
  and Monitoring Program. We were
  first contracted in 2002 solely because
  of our participation and performance in
  the SITE Program. The DOD is now
  one of our biggest customers., .and as a
  result, we have piggy backed sales to
  contractors and/or foreign governments
  (particularly in the Persian Gulf)."

      Steve Greason, Sitelab Corporation
Case Study 1: Glass Furnace Technology for
Dredged Sediments

       The Glass Furnace Technology (GFT)
was developed by the Minergy Corporation as
a means to beneficially reuse contaminated
sediment through vitrification.  The target
waste for  the technology is sediments that
have PCB and  metals  contamination.   The
GFT was  designed specifically for melting
materials that have no fuel value. Silica is one
of the primary  constituents  of sediments,
making it  a perfectly suited material  for
processing. The Glass Furnace Technology is
an adaptation of systems that have been used
for decades in glass manufacturing.  Because
a glass furnace has temperatures high enough
to melt materials into glass, corollary benefits
include destruction of organic contaminants
such as PCBs and permanent stabilization of
trace metals in the  resultant  glass product.
The glass aggregate is an inert product that is
sold to construction companies.

Technology Description

       A glass furnace is a refractory-lined,
rectangular melter.   Refractory is  brick or
concrete, which has been specifically treated
to resist chemical and physical abrasion, has
a high melting point, and  provides a high
degree of insulating value to the process.

Current glass furnaces use oxy-fuel burners,
combining natural gas and oxygen for a bright
flame above the glass. These burners raise the
internal temperature  of the melter  to 2,900
degrees Fahrenheit.   At these temperatures,
PCB contaminants  are destroyed, and the
sediment  melts  and  flows  out  of the
processing  system as molten glass.  The
molten glass is water quenched to produce an
inert   aggregate  that   is   marketed  to
construction companies.

Status

       In   2001,   the   Glass   Furnace
Technology was demonstrated in Minergy's
pilot glass  furnace located in Winneconne,
Wisconsin.   The pilot demonstration was
performed  using  contaminated  sediment
dredged from the lower Fox River, Wisconsin.
During the demonstration, the glass furnace
processed a total of 25,800 pounds of dried
sediment and produced approximately 16,200
pounds of glass aggregate product. PCB and
mercury concentrations of sediment fed into
the system during the evaluation averaged
28.1  ppm and 0.72 ppm, respectively.  PCB
                                          13

-------
and  mercury  concentrations  in the glass
aggregate product were  below  laboratory
method detection limits.

Case Study  2:  Time  Release  Electron
Acceptors  and  Donors for  Accelerated
Natural Attenuation

       The  U.S.   EPA  and   Regenesis
Bioremediation Products, Inc. demonstrated
the Hydrogen Release  Compound  (HRC)
technology at  the Fisherville  Mill site and
Rocky Mountain  Arsenal site.   The HRC
technology was designed  to enhance natural
degradation of  organic  contaminants  in
groundwater aquifers.

Technology Description

       The specific products involved in the
process  include:  1)   Oxygen  Release
Compound (ORC®),  which  provides  the
electron  acceptor oxygen to enhance  the
aerobic bioremediation of compounds such as
petroleum  hydrocarbons  and  2) Hydrogen
Release Compound (HRC®), which provides
the electron donor hydrogen to enhance the
anaerobic bioremediation of compounds such
as chlorinated solvents.   The ORC® is  a
proprietary  formulation  of   magnesium
peroxide that  only  releases oxygen when
hydrated and can provide a continuous source
of oxygen  (electron receptor) for up to  12
months. The HRC® is a polyactate ester and
also requires hydration before it releases lactic
acid, a fermentable substrate, which generates
hydrogen  (electron donor) for  up  to  18
months. The treatment is typically in situ and
both products are applied to the subsurface via
direct-push injection  or  borehole delivery
methods.

       The bioremediation component  of
natural attenuation describes  a process by
which  contaminants   are  reduced   in
concentration over time by biological action.
The process is facilitated by microbes that can
be aerobic  or anaerobic, requiring either
oxygen or hydrogen, respectively, to help
carry  out  the  degradation  of   target
contaminants. At most sites the subsurface is
lacking  these key substrates, or  they are
present  in  insufficient   amounts,   which
prevents  the  natural microbial population
from facilitating bioremediation. The use of
time-released s ubstrates s uch a s O RC® a nd
HRC® typically accelerates natural attenuation
of 10 to 100 times  faster than unassisted
natural attenuation.

Status

      Regenesis   demonstrated   the
technology at two sites in 2000-2001: Rocky
Mountain Arsenal and Fisherville Mill. The
Rocky  Mountain  Arsenal  demonstration
located in Denver, Colorado was designed to
treat a  plume contaminated  with organic
compounds.  Based on a 60-day bench-scale
study in March 2000, the HRC® was shown to
be very effective in dramatically reducing the
entire range of contaminants.  Following the
bench-scale  success, a  demonstration was
conducted at the site from February 2001 to
May 2002. Time plots of chlorinated organic
concentrations during the demonstration also
provided   evidence    for   reductive
dechlorinatoin. The results of the Fisherville
Mill  demonstration  are  currently  being
evaluated.

Case Study 3: Steam Enhanced Remediation

      SteamTech Environmental  Services,
Inc., U.S. EPA,  and the Air Force Base
Conversion Agency  conducted a research
project  on Steam Enhanced  Remediation
(SER) for the recovery of dense nonaqueous
phase  liquids  (DNAPL)  from  fractured
limestone at the former Loring Air Force Base
Quarry site. The former quarry had been used
for the disposal of more than 400 drums of
spent solvents.
                                          14

-------
Technology Description

       Steam  Enhanced  Remediation is a
combination of technologies previously used
separately, adapted to the hydrogeology of
typical contaminated sites. Steam is injected
at the periphery of the contaminated area to
heat permeable subsurface areas, vaporize
volatile compounds bound to the soil, and
drive contaminants to centrally located vapor
and liquid extraction wells. Electrical heating
is used for  less-permeable clays  and fine-
grained sediments to vaporize contaminants
and drive them into the vapor.

       SER    is  capable  of  extracting,
separating and  treating  effluent vapors,
nonaqueous phase liquids (NAPL), and water
on site for complete contaminant destruction
or off-site disposal. SER is highly effective
for removal of both volatile and  semivolatile
compounds.    SER  works both above and
below  the  groundwater  table, and  both
LNAPL and DNAPL contaminants can be
removed. The dominant removal mechanisms
for  volatile  contaminants  are the  increased
volatization  and steam stripping  when the
mixture of  water  and NAPL  reaches the
boiling  point.   Another major  removal
mechanism  of contaminants  is  the  fast
removal of liquid contaminants  by physical
transport to centrally located extraction wells.
NAPL is removed from the extraction.  In situ
destruction  of contaminants  by  thermally
accelerated  oxidation  processes  converts
harmful chemicals into carbon  dioxide and
water.

Status

       Excellent cleanup results have been
achieved in the laboratory, simulating cleanup
using steam injection and Joule heating  for
gasoline,  oils, creosote,  and  chlorinated
solvent  DNAPL.    The  research  project
conducted at  the  Loring Air  Force  Base
Quarry  site suggested  that  SER can  be
effective for increasing the mass removal rate
compared to more traditional methods such as
 "On behalf of the environmental
 community of the State of Maine, I want
 to commend the SITE Program staff for
 their contribution to the research
 program at Loring AFB. Environmental
 experts and scientists from all over the
 country closely monitored your progress.
 This project is an important step for the
 remediation  of bedrock contamination
 throughout the country."

                     Angus S. King, Jr.
                    Governor of Maine
                        December 2001
pump and treat or  soil vapor  extraction.
Aqueous and vapor phase concentrations of
contaminants  increased  throughout   the
demonstration.
                                           15

-------
                      FY 02 Progress and Accomplishments
       Over the past 17 years, SITE has earned
increased recognition as a leader in advancing
innovative  technology  development  and
commercialization   and  has  participated
cooperatively with more than 149 technology
developers. Through FY 02, the SITE Program
has successfully demonstrated 143 technologies,
6 of which were demonstrated during FY 02.
These   demonstrations   have  provided   a
tremendous  amount  of information  on  the
performance,  costs,  and   applicability   of
innovative cleanup technologies, which greatly
assists managers of environmental remediation
projects in developing appropriate and effective
cleanup solutions. SITE has been responsive to
the user community during this time,  and has
recently  focused  on  the  need  for  in situ
remediation  technologies   to  more  cost-
effectively remediate sites. As shown in Figure
6,77 completed SITE projects have been ex situ
and  66 in situ, with a marked increase  in
ongoing in situ technology demonstrations as
compared with ex situ since 1997. Eight of the
eleven ongoing demonstrations are in situ.

       Field demonstration and evaluation of in
situ technologies may require several months or
years of data collection.  This is in contrast to
field demonstrations of ex  situ technologies
where field work can be completed in 1 to 3
weeks; thus, in situ techniques have higher
budget requirements.   Based  on the SITE
Program's increased emphasis on in situ
technologies,  the   number  of  ongoing
demonstrations will likely increase, with fewer
moving from ongoing to completed status each
year than in the past.

       During FY  02, 6  new innovative
technologies  were  evaluated  in the field.
Completed  demonstration  projects  are
presented in Table 1, and ongoing projects are
provided in Table  2.   All completed  and
ongoing projects are listed  in Appendices A
and B. Figure 7 presents a  history of ex situ
versus  in  situ   distribution  for  SITE
demonstration projects.

Monitoring and Measurement Technologies
Program

       The MMT Program  has leveraged its
resources  with   EPA's   Environmental
Technology Verification Program. These two
programs,   known   collectively   as  the
Consortium  for   Site  Characterization
Technologies, have developed a partnership
I npio\ on, Hiuh-potcntKii
Technology


sin:
PROGRAM
DEMONSTRATION
• ( >btcYli\ H\
- Piou-n Icdmii.
- OA I.K
- SeienlilicalK l>
I vaiualinn
,„,,,,,
                                                  RKSILTS
                                                   SolllH'oM \IUli.VM-.
                                                  - ( ivdihle I'crlontiancc
                                                  KedcsitiiK'd'Coiitijiured
                                                  Tcdmo]oi>\  Additional
                                                  I-valuation or Abandonment
                                          16

-------

O
fi
0
£
'-4-
O
^
1)
,0
a


a In-Situ
H Ex-Situ
DU-
7n
fin
en
3U
d.n

J?O
in
i n












C










f\










C



















1
H
/A










C



















FL
I
rf^V










C


















&z


f










A










C



















n
1
r\










C









Ffc
rf-\
O=ongoing
C= complete   ^7
                                    98
          Figure 7.  History of Ex Situ vs. In Situ Distribution of SITE Demo Projects
with the DOE.   Resources  from the SITE
Program are used solely for those technologies
addressing hazardous waste.  This partnership
will help to address the demands on the MMT
Program and reduce the backlog of applications
submitted  by   developers   of  innovative
technologies.

       To further advance the MMT Program,
a stakeholder group was formed to assist in
outreach activities and in the selection  of
technologies. An advocates program involving
the EPA Regional offices was also established
to assist in the MMT demonstration process and
to  ensure   that  the   products  of   the
demonstrations address issues relevant to EPA.
                                Ongoing Demonstrations

                                       The MMT Program has two ongoing
                                demonstrations.  Approximately five vendors
                                are participating in a mercury in soils and
                                sediments demonstration at the Oak Ridge
                                National  Laboratory.  In  addition, a  dioxin
                                detection technology  demonstration  is  also
                                ongoing.
                                          17

-------
Table 1.  SITE Demonstration Projects Completed in FY 02
 Developer
  Location
 Developer
                        Technology
   Site Location
CA
Geokineties
International,
Inc.
Geokineties has constructed a closed loop lead recovery process to
treat contaminated soil from a battery shop. Soil is excavated and
stored in storage containers on-site. An electrolyte solution
(EDTA) is passed through the soil. The lead/EDTA solution will
then be processed using the electrochemical lead recovery system,
where the lead will be recovered as lead plate and ftie EDTA
Pearl Harbor, HI
CA
Integrated
Water
Resources,
Inc.
IWR has designed a steam heating with co-air injection system for
the stripping and recovery of TCE and DNAPL.  The system will
inject steam and air to strip the TCE. The TCE will not condense
at the steam front as the plot is heated. The steaming will strip the
TCE and the Vapor Recovery wells will collect the steam and TCE
for separation and off-site disposal.
                                                                                            Cape Canaveral, FL
TX
CA
Micro-Bac
International,
Inc.

X-19
Biological
Products, Inc.
This project involves two processes (Micro-Bac and X-19) for the
biological treatment of PCB's.  Products are mixed with the
contaminated soil to promote a reduction in PCB concentrations.
Goldwaithe, TX
CA
Regenesis
In Situ anaerobic-aerobic bioremediation of chlorinated solvents,
pesticides, and other contaminants.  Hydrogen Release Compound
(HRC) diffuses into groundwater passing through passive treatment
wall.  This acts as a base and cometabolite for bioremediation.
Rocky Mountain
Arsenal, CO
MA
Terra Therm
LLC
This in situ technology utilizes conductive heating from heater
wells to volatilize organic contaminants in the soil. The
contaminants are then removed with heater/vacuum wells.  	
Rocky Mountain
Arsenal, CO
                                                     18

-------
Table 2. SITE Ongoing Projects in FY 02
Developer
Location
CA
1L
MI, MS
ON, Canada
MA
CA
CA
CA
CT
NV
CA
Developer
ARCO
Argonne National
Laboratory East
Army Corps of
Engineers
Geosyntec
Harding-Lawson
Engineers
State of California
Steam Tech
Environmental
Services
Steam Tech
Environmental
Services
University of
Connecticut
University of
Nevada, Reno
Weiss Associates
Treatment Technology
This project involves evaluation of an innovative acid mine
drainage (AMD) treatment technology. Lime lagoons are used to
provide reaction time and sludge settling while pH of the AMD is
increased to around 8.5.
This project involves the phytoremediation of radionuclides and
solvents. Specifically, trees were utilized to degrade organic
contaminants or to draw tritium out of the groundwater flow.
The purpose of the demonstration is to develop and refine a
protocol for beneficial reuse of dredged sediment. The process
consists of characterization of the site to determine the
contaminant concentration spatially and at depth, identifying
possible end users of dredged materials, and working with the
material until it achieves the appropriate quality for the intended
use.
This project involves DNAPL remediation using emulsified zero-
valent iron. Site characterization and injection of the emulsified
iron was completed.
In Situ anerobic-aerobic bioremediation of chlorinated solvents.
Hydrogen Release Compound (HRC) diffuses into groundwater
passing through passive treatment wall. This acts as a base and
cometabolite for bioremediation.
This project involves evaluation of an innovative acid mine
drainage (AMD) treatment technology. Biphasis treatment uses
lime or other aklali to raise pH and precipitate metals in two
stages.
This project utilizes steam-enhanced remediation, which is an in
situ thermal treatment soil cleanup technology. The technology
involves installation of a steam injection system and an aggressive
vapor and liquid extraction system for the reduction of organic
contaminants.
This project will extend the highly successful steam injection
remediation technology to fractured rock media. The
demonstration is aimed at the recovery of chlorinated solvents and
to provide additional information regarding remediating other
fractured rock aquifers.
This project involves the evaluation of the DUOX (Dual
Oxidation) technology for remediating chlorinated organics. The
DUOX technology utilizes two different chemical oxidants
(potassium permanganate and sodium persulfate) injected into the
subsurface for the oxidation of the chlorinated solvent
contaminants.
This project involves evaluation of an innovative acid mine
drainage (AMD) treatment technology. Sulfate reducing bacteria
in bioreactors generate H2S gas which reacts with the water
column to precipitate metals and raise the pH of the AMD.
The Electrochemical Geoxidation (ECGO) process employs
electrode pairs inserted into contaminated soils and/or sediments.
A low voltage, low amperage coupled AC/DC current is applied
to create an induced polarization field. Redox reactions mineralize
organic contaminants and metals are deposited at the electrodes.
Site Location
Leviathan Mine Site,
CA
ANL-E Argonne
National Lab-East
Milwaukee, WI
Cape Canaveral, FL
Grafton, MA
Leviathan Mine Site,
CA
Ridgefield, WA
Caribou, ME
Vernon, CT
Leviathan Mine Site,
CA
Bellingham, WA
19

-------
Table 2 (continued)
Developer
Location
Developer

CT
NC
NJ
OH
MA
Milestone
MTI Inc.
Metorex
Ohio Lumex
NITON Corp.

DE
NY
NC
ME
NC
Strategic
Diagnostics
Paracelsian
Xenobiotics
Cape
Technologies
Hybrizyme
Monitoring and Measurement Technology
Mercury Testing in Soils and Sediments
Thermal decomposition, atomic absorption
Anodic Stripping Voltammetry
XRF
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
XRF
Dioxin Testing in Soils and Sediments
Immunoassay and Colorimetry
Cellular Receptor Immunoassay
Cell Based Immunoassay
DPI Immunoassay
Llmmunoassay and Colorimetry
Site Location

Oak Ridge National
Laboratory
Oak Ridge National
Laboratory
Oak Ridge National
Laboratory
Oak Ridge National
Laboratory
Oak Ridge National
Laboratory

To be determined
To be determined
To be determined
To be determined
To be determined
                                       20

-------
                                   Future Direction
 Introduction

       The science of site  investigation has
 advanced  dramatically in the past 20  years.
 Advancements in field detection equipment and
 laboratory   analyses   have   revealed  new
 information about the problems at waste sites.

       In addition, years  of experience  in the
 cleanup of hazardous waste sites have shown that
 quick, inexpensive solutions are usually elusive.
 As a  remediation  proceeds,  the task of site
 cleanup is often found to be much greater and
 much more complex than was originally expected.
 Thus the improvements in site investigation and
 the lessons learned from  both successful and
 unsuccessful site remediation have demonstrated
 a   great   demand   for   effective   innovative
 technologies.

       A number of promising technologies based
 on sound  scientific  principles,  but  lacking
 engineering and performance documentation, are
 appearing  on  the  horizon.  Some of these,
 described below, are being studied  under the
 SITE Program, and by the U.S. Department of
 Energy, U.S. Department of Defense, and others.
 It  is likely that field demonstrations may occur
 within the next few years for these technologies or
 for second-generation  improvements  of these
 techniques.

       The SITE Program continues to emphasize
the importance  of  first  selecting a  site and,
secondly,  evaluating one  or more  appropriate
innovative  technologies. The selection of these
sites and technologies is important in meeting the
needs of  those  responsible for  selecting and
Site Program Partners
• DOD Environmental Security and Technology
  Certification Program (ESTCP)
• DOE Office of Science and Technology
• EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
• EPA Regional Offices
• Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council
  (ITRC)
 implementing hazardous waste cleanup. Over
 the past several years the SITE program has
 been focusing on in situ techniques.  A wide
 range of representation  from relevant federal
 and state agencies helps ensure that the most
 pressing issues are prioritized and addressed.

       In response to Agency  priorities  and
 stakeholder  input,   the  MMT program is
 working  to  verify the  performance   of
 innovative field technologies which can be
 used to measure mercury and dioxin in soil and
 sediment.   The mercury verification  study
 includes five developers who are using a
 variety  of scientific techniques to measure
 mercury under field locations. The dioxin field
 study consists  of five technologies  using a
 variation of an  immunoassay technique.  The
 technologies offer the promise of ultra  low
 detection levels and a cost significantly below
 that of conventional high-resolution GC/MS.

       The  next phase  of the  program will
include  an updated demonstration of X-Ray
Fluorescence (XRF) technologies.  The XRF
industry  has changed significantly since  the
first demonstration of this  technology was
conducted nearly 7 years ago.  This will be the
first demonstration of this type and represents
                                           21

-------
an  evolution of the program.   Other planned
verification studies included the measurement of
phenol and its halogenated analogs as well as the
detection of certain pesticides which are no longer
in use but represent a significant health hazard.

Technology Areas of Primary Interest

       One of the critical needs for remediation
technology is for methods to  accelerate aquifer
cleanup. Groundwater contamination may consist
of dissolved-phase contaminant plumes, light non-
aqueous phase liquids (LNAPLS), and dense non-
aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLS), all of which
can potentially move in different directions. As
the  complexity  of  the  geological  formation
increases  so  does  the  need  for  innovative
technologies to treat or detect non-aqueous phase
contamination in groundwater. New technologies
are  needed  to  control  and  remediate this
widespread problem.

       In addition to groundwater contamination,
The SITE Program continues to place priority on
evaluating technologies for treatment of metals
and/or recalcitrant organic compounds in soil. In
situ technologies for either soil or groundwater
continue  to   remain a  priority  for  the SITE
Program.

       Because of technical difficulties related to
sediment remediation, this is another area where
the  remediation community would benefit from
new processes,  approaches  or  less-expensive
methods  for  treatment.   In  situ  treatment,
sampling and containment are technology areas of
interest that will be addressed  in the future.

       More  recently there have been significant
technology breakthroughs in chemical conversion
methodologies.   Technologies  that   rely  on
chemical conversion of the contaminant species
rather than destruction or stabilization will end the
remediation process at treatment. Metal enhanced
dechlorination or treatment barriers fall into this
category.  This  technology  is a groundwater
treatment  technique  that  degrades  chlorinated
volatile  organics  (VOCs)   using  an
electrochemical process that oxidizes granular
iron while reducing and dechlorinating VOCs.
Two  methods  of in situ metal  enhanced
dechlorination have been developed: in situ
permeable treatment trenches (including funnel
and gate configurations) and reactor vessels
containing granular iron and located in  the
subsurface.    In   the  future,   material
effectiveness on VOCs and other groundwater
contaminants may be evaluated.

       The SITE Program emphasizes the need
for technologies capable  of in situ remediation
of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs)
in  difficult geological   formations.   This
continues  to  be  a theme  through  the
remediation community as  a whole.   The
program continues to evaluate in situ thermal
and  chemical oxidation type  technologies
under a broad array of geological conditions. In
addition, effective remediation technologies for
metals  in  soils,  treatment  of  recalcitrant
compounds, and the  general need for in situ
treatment remain high on the priority list.

       The SITE Program will also continue to
emphasize the need for technologies that focus
more on types of contaminated sites rather than
single  contaminants  (i.e., wood preserving
sites, manufactured gas plant sites). Most sites
are  not   contaminated  with  a  single
contaminant, but with mixtures including by-
products formed  from  normal degradation.
Recent  applications  have lead the  SITE
Program to move  in this direction.  Based on
input  from the multi-agency review board, a
list of new priority areas  are:

•   Sediments
•  Mining Issues\Acid Mine Drainage
•  Manufactured  Gas Plants
•  Wood TreatingYPreserving
•  Pesticide ManufacturersYFormulators

Table 3  outlines  the contaminant areas of
interest,  and  Table   4   describes  the
demonstrations that are planned for FY02.
                                           22

-------
Table 3. Future Contaminant Emphasis Areas 2003 - 2007
Groundwater/Surface Water
DNAPLA Chlorinated Solvents
Arsenic, Mercury or other Heavy Metals
PCBs

Sediments
PCBs
Arsenic, Mercury, or other Heavy Metals
PAHs
Pesticides
Soils
DNAPL
Arsenic, Mercury
Chlorinated Solvents
PCBs
Table 4. SITE Program Projects FY 03
Site Name/
Location
Former
Manufactured Gas
Plant Site
Millville,NJ
Summitville, CO
Port of Ridgefield
Ridgefield, WA
Cape Canaveral
Cocoa Beach, FL
Cape Canaveral
Cocoa Beach, FL
Pearl Harbor Naval
Base
Technology
Ex situ Biotreatment reactor
technique
Multiple innovative passive
drainage techniques
In situ steam heating
In situ reactive iron slurry
In situ biological treatment
In situ capping techniques
Project Description
Comingled groundwater
plume contaminated
with PAHs, MTBE and
BTEX
Treatment of acid mine
drainage
Groundwater and soils
contaminated with
DNAPL
Groundwater and soils
contaminated with TCE
Groundwater and soils
contaminated with TCE
Evaluate biological and
stabilization\detoxificati
on techniques
Proposed Schedule
Demonstration FY03
Demonstration FY03
Demonstration FY03-04
Technology
demonstration FY02-03
Technology
demonstration FY02-03
Demonstration planning to
begin summer FY 03-04
23

-------
MMT Program Areas of Interest

       The   Monitoring   and  Measurement
Technologies Program will continue to test and
evaluate in situ and  ex situ field  analytical
technologies, sampling techniques, and methods
for  the  determination  of the  chemical  and
physical properties of hazardous waste sites. The
schedule of field demonstrations have kept pace
with the emergence of new technologies. Input
from clients and developers shows an ongoing
need to explore new applications which support
the goals of the SITE Program. In particular, there
remain  many  monitoring  and measurement
technology needs  including the  detection  and
measurement  of organic  compounds in   the
subsurface (particularly LNAPLs and DNAPLs).

       Technologies are emerging  that show
promise for DNAPL detection, but they may not
be ready for testing until 2003 or 2004. There is a
demand for non-invasive technologies that can be
used to detect the presence of contaminants in the
subsurface as well as to image the hydrogeologic
properties   of  sites.   The  detection  and
measurement of mercury in soil  has  also been
identified as a technology area of considerable
interest. The MMTP will be testing as many as
nine technologies which address this need during
FY02. The measurement of dioxin has typically
required that  samples  be analyzed  in fixed
laboratories  using  prescribed,  labor-intensive
analytical methods.  During FY02, a survey was
conducted to  identify  a number of emerging
technologies that may be  used  to detect  and
possibly quantify the concentration of dioxin in
soil.   Some  of these  technologies  will  be
considered for a field demonstration in FY03.

       The use of biological test kits which can
determine the  toxicity of environmental media
will  also  be  considered  for  demonstration.
Biosensor and microelectronic devices represent
areas of intense research  interest.   The  first
candidates from this class of technologies will be
ready for testing  in FY04.
                                          24
       Since the program has matured, a
 number of developers in the area of X-ray
 fluorescence and gas chromatography /mass
 spectrometry  have  made   significant
 improvements in their technology and will be
 candidates for  abbreviated  demonstrations
 which will evaluate the improvements. These
 demonstrations  will be conducted in FY 03
 and FY04.

 Partnerships for Success

 Federal to Federal Interface

       The  SITE Program will continue to
 recognize the  importance of  cooperation
 between  federal agencies  to  find common
 areas of  need and interest. Interfacing with
 other federal agencies is an important aspect
 of  enhancing  the benefits  of technology
 demonstrations.   It  allows  for leveraging
 resources, expedited performance and cost
 information  exchange and  cross fertilization
 of technical  expertise between agencies.  In
 addition, this type of collaboration encourages
 the implementation of innovative approaches
 by  federal end users in a more expedited
 manner and,  in many cases, implementation at
 other non-federal site locations.

       One  example of shared interest is in
 DNAPL contamination in the subsurface. It
 is an environmental problem shared by many
 of  the  member agencies  of the  Federal
 Remediation  Technologies   Roundtable
 (FRTR).   These  agencies have a  mutual
 interest in finding cost-effective solutions to
 the characterization, treatment and monitoring
 of their DNAPL sites.

       In 1997, NASA, DOE, EPA and DoD
joined forces in  forming the  Interagency
 DNAPL   Consortium (IDC)  in  order  to
 evaluate  a  variety  of DNAPL treatment
 technologies at  a site on  Cape Canaveral,
 Florida.  These agencies, under the auspices
 of the FRTR, believe that they should expand
 on the concept of the IDC by formation of the
 Federal  DNAPL  Technologies  Initiative

-------
 Program (FeDTIP).  Our vision is for FeDTIP to
 be a cooperative program with objectives broadly
 focused on finding cost-effective technologies for
 treating DNAPL contamination across a spectrum
 of site conditions.

 The primary objectives of the FeDTIP are to:

 •  Develop linkages among the many federal
   DNAPL science and technology activities
   currently   ongoing;   the  goal   is  to  be
   complementary rather than duplicative of these
   activities.

 •  Sponsor  and   participate  in   technology
   demonstrations  and  deployments at federal
   DNAPL sites representing a variety of  site
   conditions to gain cost and performance data.

 •  Identify the key science and technology issues
   resulting   from  demonstrations   and
   deployments that must be resolved in order to
   reduce  costs and improve  performance of
   DNAPL site cleanup.

 •  Develop or participate in  development of
   technical  practices  and  design  guidance
   manuals for key technologies that will become
   the  standard  for application   at  DNAPL
   contaminated sites.

 •  Develop an effective  technology transfer
   process  for the benefit of the  broader DNAPL
   remediation and regulatory community.

       To  date, three technologies have  been
 demonstrated  at Cape  Canaveral  Air  Station
 Launch Complex 34. New project selections and
 starts are scheduled for FY 03.

Federal to  State Interface

       Where there are  common environmental
areas  of interest, it is equally important to have
federal to state interactions as it is to  have federal
to  federal  cooperation.  Cooperation    with
organizations such  as the Environmental Council
of States  (ECOS)  and  Interstate   Technology
Regulatory   Council   (ITRC)   promotes
partnerships and builds  confidence within the

                                           25
 environmental  community  that    proven
 innovative  technology can  provide  more-
 effective  and less-expensive environmental
 protection.

       The ITRC provides a mechanism to
 interact   with  multiple   state  regulatory
 agencies  and  state  specific  verification
 programs. The ITRC  is a state-led national
 coalition   dedicated   to  achieving  better
 environmental protection through the  use of
 innovative technologies.
 "The SITE Program has been tremendously valuable to
 the State of Maine's environmental program. The
 success of the work done by the SITE Program will
 enable us to resolve various environmental issues
 throughout the State of Maine."

                Naji Akladiss, P.E.,Project Manager
            Maine Dept. of Environmental Protection
       The  ITRC  currently  has  several
workgroups that crosscut the SITE Program's
environmental priority areas of interest.  The
various groups are  as  follows:  1) Passive
Barrier Workgroup, 2) DNAPL Workgroup,
3)  Phytoremediation Workgroup, and 4)
Sediment Workgroup. These groups are and
will continue to be invited to participate in
SITE  Program   demonstration  projects.
Groups  choose to  participate  at a  level
required by the objectives of the workgroup.
 Involvement of the workgroups allows for
better planning and  exchange of  technical
requirements early in the planning of SITE
projects.   For instance, ITRC's DNAPL
workgroup   is  focused  on   developing
innovative techniques to remedy the DNAPL
challenge.    The  workgroup  consists  of
members from states, federal partners such as
DOE and EPA, and industry members.

       Direct interaction with multiple state
agencies  provides  many benefits.   State
regulatory agencies are  also faced with the
difficult problems associated with hazardous
waste  clean-up,   and   the  variation  of
regulations between states. Interaction among
multiple states on SITE projects can result in

-------
multiple technical issues being addressed in one
field demonstration. This reduces duplication of
field demonstrations to answer one or more state
specific regulatory questions.
       An   example  of  the  federal-to-state
interface is demonstrated at the Loring Air Force
Base SITE Demonstration. On September 10 and
11, a 2-day technical seminar was held at Loring
AFB to present all the details about the Quarry
site  characterization  and  monitoring,  steam
remediation process, and site tour. The following
day, September  12, dignitaries  from  the state,
federal  EPA,   DOD,   Loring  Development
Authority, and Senator Collins office attended a
visitors day designed to showcase the SteamTech
SITE  Demonstration.  Brief presentations were
made on site history, test design, and technology
followed by a field visit to the demonstration
location. The Loring AFB, Site Demonstration is
the first field DNAPL recovery research project of
this scale in fractured rock.   Results  from  this
demonstration will have significant impact in the
scientific community.

Information Transfer

       Information  transfer  is  accomplished
through a number of mechanisms.  While  the
internet information distribution is an effective
mechanism, published documentation, meetings,
and conferences  remain an  essential  part of
technical information dissemination.

       Coordination  with existing remediation
workgroups and programs is also essential.  The
SITE  Program continues to work cooperatively
with numerous programs, such as DOD's ESTCP
Program, the Environmental Council of States
(ECOS) sponsored ITRC, and the DOE's Science
and Technology Program.

       ITRC Team meetings and special  site
tours have been  conducted near SITE Program
field demonstrations  in  order to  capitalize on
multiple State participation.

       The program will continue pursuing
and supporting the development of document
summaries in areas where data exists on a
variety of technologies or applications. The
information is useful in providing  the user
community  with  comparative  technical
information and  costs  within an  area.
Documentation  will continue for some time
since many of the technologies are in situ and
highly  complex.    In   situ  technology
evaluations are tested over varying lengths of
time,  with a minimum time period of 3-6
months. Most are evaluated for one year. In
the case  of biological  treatment or in situ
capping techniques demonstrations may span
2-3 years. The summaries will need updating
as the technologies mature and  information
becomes available.

Conclusions

       The SITE program is a key element in
EPA's efforts to increase the availability and
use of innovative technologies for remediation
of the nation's  hazardous waste sites.  The
SITE  Program  technology evaluations are
used by the remediation community to choose
cleanup technology options, and that data is
credible  because of the  rigorous  quality
assurance  and   careful  planning  of  the
demonstrations.  Some   technologies  once
considered innovative have been accepted as
standard  in  part  because  of this program.
Superfund site managers, who in 1986 had the
choice of incineration or landfill, can now find
many other tools in the "remediation toolbox."
SITE  continues to  look  to the future for
innovative  solutions  to solve  the  cleanup
challenges of the past.

   http ://www.epa.gov/ORD/SITE
                                          26

-------
          Appendix A
       SITE PROJECTS
(Alphabetically by Developer State)
             A-l

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
California
Developer
CMS Research
Corporation
Birmingham, AL
Arctic Foundations
Anchorage, AK
Brice
Environmental
Service Corp.
(BESCORP)
Fairbanks, AK
Arizona State
University
Tempe, AZ
STC Omega
(formerly Silicate
Technology
Corporation)
Scottsdale, AZ
Analytical and
Remedial
Technology, Inc.,
Milpitas, CA
ARCO
CA
Berkeley
Environmental
Restoration Center
(formerly Udell
Technologies, Inc.)
Emeryville, CA
Binax Corp., Antox
Division
Sunnyville, CA
COGN1S, Inc.
Santa Rosa, CA
Eco Mat, Inc.
Hayward, CA
Energy and
Environmental
Research
Corporation
Irvine, CA
Technology
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Freeze Barrier
Soil Washing Plant
Photocatalytic
Oxidation and Air
Stripping
Solidification and
Stabilization
Treatment
Automated
Sampling and
Analytical Platform
Lime Lagoons
In situ Enhanced
Extraction
Imunoassay for
PCB in Soil
Biological/
Chemical
Treatment
Biological
Denitrification
Hybrid Fluidized
Bed System
Contact
H. Ashley Page
205-773-6911
Ed Yarmak
907-562-2741
Craig Jones
907-452-2512
Gregory Raupp
606-965-2828
Elliot Berman
352-867-1320
Stephen Pelger
Scott Larsen
602-948-7100
Gary Hopkins
408-263-8931
Baffy Duff
406-563-5211
Kent Udell
510-642-2928
Steve Collins
510-643-1300
Richard
Lankow
408-752-1353
Steve Rock
U.S. EPA
513-569-7149
Kim Halley
510-783-5885
Richard
Koppang
714-859-8851
Program
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Status
Completed 1992
Completed 1998
Completed 1 992
Completed 1999
Completed 1990
Completed 1991
Ongoing
Completed 1993
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
Completed 2000
Completed 1 992
                A-2

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
California
(continued)
Developer
Energy and
Environmental
Research
Corporation
Irvine, CA
Environmental
Biotechnologies
Montara, CA
EPOC Water, Inc.
Fresno, CA
General Atomics
(formerly Ogden
Environmental
Services)
San Diego, CA
Geokinetics
Berkeley, CA
Geokinetics
Berkeley, CA
Geokinetics &
Duke Engineering
GIS\Solutions, Inc.
Concord, CA
Groundwater
Technology
Government
Services, Inc.
Concord, CA
Hughes
Environmental
Systems, Inc.
Manhattan Beach,
CA
Integrated Water
Resources, Inc.
Lockheed Martin
Missiles & Space
Co., Inc.
Palo Alto, CA
Technology
Reactor Filter
System
Microbiai
Composting
Precipitation,
Microfiltration,
Sludge Dewatering
Circulating Bed
Combuster
Acoustic Barrier
Separator
Electrokinetics
Closed Loop Lead
Recovery
Electrokinetic
Heating &
Surfactant Flushing
GIS\Key
Environmental Data
Management
Software
Biological
Composting
Steam Enhanced
Recovery Process
Stripping of TCE
Electrokinetic
Remediation
Contact
Neil Widmer
714-X59-8851
Douglas
Munnecke
415-596-1020
Scott Jackson
209-291-8144
Robert Goforth
619-455-2499
Anthony
Gattuso
619-455-2910
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Garry Reid
510-827-5400
Ronald Hicks
510-671-2387
Paul De Percin
U.S. EPA
513-569-7797
805-565-0996
Steven H.
Schwartzkopf
415-424-3176
Program
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed 1995
Completed 1999
Completed
Completed 1993
Completed 1989
Completed 1995
Completed 2000
Completed 2002
Completed 1999
Completed 1993
Completed 1995
Completed 1993
Completed 2002
Completed
               A-3

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
California
(continued)
Developer
Magnum Water
Technology
El Segundo, CA
Membrane
Technology and
Research, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA
North American
Technologies
Aprotek
San Ramon, CA
NOVATERRA,
Inc. (formerly
Toxic Treatments
USA, Inc.)
Los Angeles, CA
Praxis
Environmental
Services
Burlingame, CA
Pulse Sciences,
San Leandro. CA
Radian Corporation
(formerly AWD
Technologies, Inc.)
Walnut Creek, CA
Regenesis
Retech, Inc.
Ukiah, CA
Rochem Separation
Systems, Inc.
Torrance, CA
Roy F. Weston
Sherman Oaks, CA
Simulprobe
Technologies, Inc.
Technology
CAV-OX Process
VaporSep
Membrane Process
Oleofilter
In-situ and Air
Stripping
In-situ Steam
Enhanced
Extraction
X-Ray Treatment
(Aqueous)
X-Ray Treatment
(Soils)
Integrated Vapor
Extraction and
Steam Vacuum
Stripping
Biological
Treatment, HRCof
Organics
Plasma Arc
Vitrification
Rochem Disc Tube
Module System
In well Air
Stripping
Core Barrel Soil
Sampler
Contact
Dale Cox
310-322-4143
Jack Simser
310-640-7000
Marc Jacobs
Doug
Gottschlich
415-328-2228
Cathryn
Wimberly
916-366-6185
Philip LaMori
310-328-9433
Lloyd Stewart
415-641-9044
Vernon Bailey
510-632-5100
ext. 227
Vernon Bailey
510-632-5100
ext. 227
David Bluestein
415-227-0822
Dr. Stephen
Koeningberg
949-366-8000
Ronald
Womack Leroy
B. Leland 707-
462-6522
David
LaMonica
310-370-3160
Jeff Bannon
818-971-4900
Eric Klingel
704-660-1673
Richard Laton
415-883-8787
Program
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Status
Completed 1993
Completed 1991
Completed
Completed 1989
Completed 1997
Completed 1 994
Completed
Completed 1990
Completed 2002
Completed 1991
Completed 1994
Completed 1994
Completed
               A-4

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
California
(continued)
Colorado
Developer
SIVE Services
Dixon, CA
SRI Instruments
Torrance, CA
State of California
Steam Tech
Environmental
Services
Bakersfield, CA
Steam Tech
Environmental
Services
Bakersfield, CA
Terra-Kleen
Response Group,
Inc.
Del Mar, CA
Texaco, Inc.
S. El Monte, CA
Thermatrix, Inc.
(Formerly Purus,
Inc.)
San Jose, CA
U.S. EPA Region
IX
San Francisco, CA
U.S. Filter
(formerly Ultrox)
Santa Ana, CA
Weiss Associates
Emeryville, CA
Xon Tech, Inc.
Van Nuys, CA
X-19 Biological
Products, Inc.
CF Systems
Corporation
Arvada, CO

Technology
Steam Injection and
Vacuum Extraction
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Biphasic Lime
Treatment
Steam Enhanced
Remediation
In-situ Thermal
(Steam Injection)
Solvent Extraction
Entrained-Bed
Gasification
Photolytic
Oxidation
Excavation and
Foam Suppression
of Volatiles
Ultraviolet
Radiation and
Oxidation
Electrochemcial
Geoxidation
Xon Tech Sector
Sampler
Microbial
Degradation of
PCBs
Solvent Extraction
Batch Organics
Extraction Unit
Contact
Douglas Dieter
916-678-8358
Douglas
Gavilanes
310-214-5092
Chris Stetler
530-542-5461
Hank Sowers
661-322-6478
Hank Sowers
661-322-6478
Alan Cash
619-558-8762
John Wintor
310-908-7387
Steve McAdams
408-453-0490
John Blevins
415-744-2400
John Lowry
412-722-1247
Joe Lovenitti
510-450-6141
Matt Young
818-787-7380
Paul E. Gill
408-970-9485
L.V.
Benningfield
303-420-1550
L.V.
Benningfield
303-420-1550
Program
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Exited
Completed 1992
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed 1994
Completed 1997
Completed 1994
Completed 1992
Completed 1990
Completed 1989
Ongoing
Completed 1991
Completed 2002
Completed 1988
Completed
               A-5

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Colorado
(continued)
Connecticut
Developer
Colorado Dept. of
Health
Denver, CO
Colorado School of
Mines, Golden, CO
and Colorado
Department of
Health
Denver, CO
General
Environmental
Corporation
Englewood, CO
Pintail Systems,
Inc.
Aurora, CO
Region 8 and State
of Colorado
Rocky Mountain
Remediation
Services
Golden, CO
Smith
Environmental
Technologies
Corporation
(formerly Canonie
Environmental
Services Corp.)
Englewood, CO
Dexsil Corporation
Hamden, CT
4 demonstrations
Technology
Wetland-Based
Treatment for
Mineral Mine
Drainage
Wetlands-Based
Treatment
Electrocoagulation
Biodegradation of
Cyanide
Biostabilization of
Lead
Biostabilization of
Mercury Mining
Wastes
Biological
Stabilization of
Arsenic in Soils
Multiple Innovative
Passive mine
Drainage
Technologies
Environmental Soil
Amendment
(Stabilization)
Low Temperature
Thermal Aeration
Anaerobic Thermal
Processor
Environmental Test
Kits (PCB) Chlor-
N-Soil
L2000
PCB/Chloride
Analyzer
Contact
Jim Lewis
303-692-3390
Thomas
Wildeman
303-273-3642
Carl Dalrymple
303-761-6960
Caren Caldwell
303-367-8443
Leslie
Thompson
303-367-8443
Leslie
Thompson
303-367-8443
Leslie
Thompson
303-367-8443
Victor
Kettellapper
303-312-6578
Jim Barthel
303-215-6620
Joseph Mutton
303-790-1747
Joseph Hutton
303-790-1747
Jack Mahon
203-288-3509
Program
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Status
Completed 1999
Completed
Completed 1995
Completed 1998
Completed 2000
Completed
Completed 2000
Completed 2001
Completed
Completed 1992
Completed 1991
Completed 1993
               A-6

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Connecticut
(continued)
Delaware
Florida
Georgia

Developer
University of
Connecticut
E.I. DuPont de
Nemours and Co.
and Oberlin Filter
Co.
Newark, DE and
Waukesha, WI
Hewlett-Packard
(formerly MTI
Analytical
Instruments)
Wilmington, DE
Strategic
Diagnostics Inc.
(formerly Ensys,
Inc.)
Newark, DE
Funderburk and
Associates
Apollo Beach, FL
High Voltage
Environmental
Applications,
Inc./Florida
International
University and
University of
Miami
Miami, FL
High Voltage
Environmental
Applications, Inc.
Miami, FL
PCP, Inc.
West Palm Beach,
FL
American
Combustion, Inc.
Norcross, GA
ETC., Inc.
Norcross, GA
Sonotech, Inc.
Atlanta, GA
Technology
Permanganate/
Persulfate
Oxidation
Treatment for PCE
Membrane
Microfiltration
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Immunoassay for
PCP
Dechlorination and
Immobilization
High-Energy
Electron Irradiation
(Aqueous)
High Energy
Electronic Beam
(Solids)
Ion Mobility
Spectrometry
PYRETRON
Thermal
Destruction
Long-Path Fourier
Transform Infrared
Spectrometer
Frequency Tunable
Pulse Combustion
System
Contact
George Hoag
860-486-2781
Ernest Mayer
302-774-2277
Hewlett-
Packard
800-227-9770
Bob Belair
302-633-8487
Tim Lawruk
800-544-8881
302-456-6782
Ray Funderburk
800-723-8847
William Cooper
910-962-3450
William Cooper
305-593-5330
Martin Cohen
407-683-0507
Gregory Oilman
404-564-4180
Orman Simpson
404-242-0977
Ben Zinn
404-894-3033
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Status
Ongoing
Completed 1990
Completed 1992
Completed 1993
Completed 1 997
Completed 1 993
Completed 1994
Completed
Completed 1991
Completed 1988
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
               A-7

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Georgia
(continued)
Idaho
Illinois
Developer
Williams
Environmental
Services, Inc.
(Formerly Harmon
Environmental
Services, Inc.)
Stone Mountain,
GA
Aquatic Research
Instruments
Aquatic Research
Instruments
Argonne National
Laboratory West
Idaho Fall, ID
Art's
Manufacturing and
Supply

J.R. Simplot Co.
Pocatello, ID

Morrison Knudsen
Corp./STG
Technologies
Boise, ID
Process
Technologies, Inc.
Boise, ID
U.S. DOE/ Duke
Engineering
Lockheed, ID
Allied Signal
Corporation
Des Plains, IL
Argonne National
Laboratory East
Institute of Gas
Technology
Technology
Soil Washing
Sediment Core
Sampler
Russian Peat Borer
Phytoremediation
of Radionuclides
AMS™ Dual-Tube
Liner Soil Sampler
AMS™ Split Core
Sampler
Anaerobic
Biological Process
Anaerobic
Biological Process
Grouting Technique
Photolytic
Destruction of SVE
off-gases
Surfactant
Enhanced Acquifer
Remediation
Submerged Aerobic
Fixed Film Reactor
Phyroremediation
of Radionuclides
Chemical and
Biological
Treatment
Contact
S. Jackson
Hubbard
(U.S. EPA)
513-569-7507
Will Young
208-768-2222
Will Young
208-768-2222
Scott Lee
208-533-7829
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
Russell Kaake
208-235-5620
Tom Yergovich
209-858-2511
Kathryn Levilm
Rick Raymondi
208-386-6115
Michael Swan
208-385-0900
Michael Shook
208-526-6945
Steve Lupton
708-391-3500
Christina Negri
Robert Kelley
847-768-0722
Program
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Status
Exited 1992
Completed
Completed
Ongoing
Completed
Completed 1 999
Completed 1 993
Completed 1994
Completed
Exited
Completed 1999
Completed
Ongoing
Completed 1993
               A-8

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Illinois
(continued)
Indiana
Iowa
Developer

Institute of Gas
Technology
OHM
Environmental
(formerly RUST
Remedial Services,
Inc.)
Lombard, 1L
Recycling Sciences,
Jnc.
Chicago, 1L
Wheelabrator Clean
Air Systems
(formerly Chemical
Waste
Management)
Schaumburg, 1L
Bio-Rem, Inc.
Butler, IN
Geoprobe
Salina, KS
Sevenson
Environmental
Services, Inc.
Munster, IN
Sevenson
Environmental
Services, Inc.
Munster, IN
Soil Tech, ATP
Systems Inc
Porter, IN
Clements
Associates, Inc.
Technology
Fluid Extraction-
Biological
Degradation
Process
Fluidized-Bed
Cyclonic
Agglomerating
Incinerator
Superficial
Extraction/Liquid
Phase Oxidation of
Waste
X-TRAX Thermal
Desorption
Desorption and
Vapor Extraction
System
Evaporation and
Chemical Oxidation
Augmented In-situ
Subsurface
Bioremediation
Process
Soil, Water, Vapor
Sampling Cone
Penetrometer
Chemical
Stabilization of
Mercury Mining
Wastes
MAECTITE®
Treatment Process
Thermal Desorption
JMC
Environmentalist's
Subsoil Probe
Contact
Albert Paterek
847-768-0720
Mike Mensinger
847-768-0602
Amir Rehtnat
847-768-0588
Mike Mensinger
847-768-0602
Dick Ayen
803-646-2413
William
Meenan
312-663-4269
Bob Hernquist
708-706-6900
David Mann
219-868-5823
800-428-4626
Wes McCall
Tom Omli
800-436-7762
Steve Chisick
219-836-0116
Chuck
McPheeters
219-836-0116
Joe Mutton
219-926-8651
Jim Clements
515-792-8285
Program
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measuring
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurements
Technologies
Status
Completed 1992
Completed
Completed
Completed 1992
Completed
Completed
Completed 1993
Completed 1 995
Exited
Completed 2000
Completed 1992
Completed
               A-9

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maryland
Massachusetts
Developer
Geoprobe Systems
Salina, KS
Microsensor
System, Inc.
Bowling Green, KY
Advanced
Remediation
Mixing, Inc.
(Formerly Chemfix
Technologies, Inc.)
Kenner, LA
Electrokinetics, Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
SBP Technologies,
Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
Quadrel Services,
Inc.
W. L. Gore and
Associates, Inc.
ABB
Environmental
Services, Inc.
Wakefield, MA
Harding Lawson
Associates
(formally ABB
Environmental
Services, Inc.)
Wakefield, MA
Harding-Lawson
Engineers
Wakefield, MA
Bruker Instruments
Billerica, MA
HNU Systems, Inc.
Newtown, MA
Technology
Large Bore Soil
Sampler
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Solidification and
Stabilization
Electrokinetic
Remediation
Electro-Klean
Electrokinetic
Soil Remediation
Membrane
Separation and
Bioremediation
Emflux® Soil-Gas
Survey System
Gore-Scrubber®
Passive Soil Gas
Sampler
Anaerobic/
Aerobic Sequential
Bioremediation
Two-Zone Plume
Interception In-situ
Treatment Strategy
In-situ Anerobic-
aerotic
Bioremediation
Bruker Mobile
Environmental
Monitor
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Contact
Wesley McCall
Tom Omli
800-436-7762
Norman Davis
502-752-1353
Sam Pizzitola
504-461-0466
Elif Acar
504-388-3992
Elif Acar
504-753-8004
Clayton Page
504-755-7711
Bruce Tucker
Paul Henning
301-874-5510
Ray
Fenstermacher
410-392-7600
Willard Murray
617-245-6606
Jaret Johnson
Willard Murray
617-245-6606
William Murray
617-245-6606
Dr. Brian
Abraham
508-667-9580
Jack Driscoll
800-724-6690
617-964-6690
Program
Monitoring and
Measurements
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Status
Completed
Completed 1995
Completed 1989
Completed 1989
Exited
Exited
Completed
1995
Completed
Completed
Completed 1998
Completed
Ongoing
Completed
Completed 1992
               A-10

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Massachusetts
(continued)
Michigan (and
Mississippi)
Minnesota


Developer
HNU Systems, Inc.
Newtown, MA
KSE, Inc.
Amherst, MA
Maxymillian
Technologies, Inc.
(formerly Clean
Berkshires)
Lanesboro, MA
Millipore
Corporation
Bedford, MA
Niton Corporation
Bedford, MA
Ohmicron
Corporation
Newton, MA
PS1 Technology Co.
Andover, MA
Terra-Therm LLC
Fitchburg, MA
UV Technologies,
Inc.
(formerly Energy
and Environmental
Engineering, Inc.)
East Cambridge,
MA
Army Corps of
Engineers
BioTrol Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
Technology
Portable X-Ray
Fluorescence
Spectrometer
Air II
Photocatalytic
Technology for Air
Streams
High Temperature
Thermal Process
EnviroGard PCB
Immunoassay Tost
Kit
Immunoassay for
PCP (Soil, Water)
Portable X-Ray
Fluorescence
Spectrometer
Immunoassay for
PCP in Soil
Immobilize and
Decontaminate
Metals in
Aggregate Solids
In-Situ Thermal
Laser-Induced
Photochemical
Oxidative
Destruction
Phytoremediation
Biotreatment of
Groundwater
Methanotropic
Bioreactor System
Biological Aqueous
Treatment System
Contact
Jack Driscoll
800-724-6690
617-964-6690
James Kittrell
413-549-5506
Jim
Maxymillian
413-499-3050
Alan Weiss
617-275-9200
Alan Weiss
617-275-9200
Don Sackett
781-275-9275
Mary Hayes
215-860-51 15
Joseph Morency
508-689-0003
Ralph Baker
978-343-0300
John Roll
James Porter
617-666-5500
Detroit, MI and
Vicksburg, MS
Dennis Chilcote
612-942-8032
Durell Dobbins
612-942-8032
Durell Dobbins
612-942-8032
Program
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Status
Completed 1 995
Completed 1999
Completed 1993
Completed 1992
Completed 1993
Completed 1995
Completed 1993
Completed 1993
Completed 2002
Completed 1993
Ongoing
Completed 1989
Completed 1992
Completed 1989
               A-ll

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Minnesota
(continued)
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Jersey
Developer
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
Membrane
Corporation
Minneapolis, MN
COGNIS
TERRAMET
Gross, MO
Montana College of
Mineral Science
and Technology
Butte, MT
University of
Nebraska
Lincoln, NE
U.S. EPA
Las Vegas, NV
University of
Nevada, Reno
Reno, NV
Accutech Inc
Keyport, NJ and
New Jersey
Institute of
Technology
Newark, NJ
ART International,
Inc.
(formerly Enviro
Sciences, Inc.)
Denville, NJ
Dehydro-Tech.
Corporation
Somerville, NJ
Geotech
Development
Corporation
Newark, NJ
Envirogen, Inc.
Lawrenceville, NJ
Technology
Soil Washing
System
Membrane Gas
Transfer in Waste
Remediation
Removal of Lead
from Soils
Air-Sparged -
Hydrocyclone
Campbell
Centrifugal Jig
Spray Irrigation
Field Analytical
Screening Program
(FASP)
Passive Constructed
Wetlands
Pneumatic
Fracturing
Extraction and Hot
Gas Injection
Low-Energy
Solvent Extraction
Process
Carver-Greenfield
Process for
Extraction of Oily
Waste
Cold Top
Vitrification
Microbial
Degradation/
Solvent Extraction
Contact
Dennis Chilcote
612-942-8032
Charles Gantzer
612-378-2160
Lou Magdits
573-626-3476
Theodore
Jordan
406-496-4112
406-496-4193
Gordon Ziesing
406-496-1573
406-496-4193
Ray Spalding
402-483-3931
Howard Fribush
703-603-8831
Larry Jack
702-798-2373
Tim Tsukamoto
775-784-4413
John Liskowitz
908-739-6444
Werner Steiner
201-627-7601
Theodore
Trowbridge
908-904-1606
William
Librizzi
201-596-5846
Thomas Tate
610-337-8515
Ronald
Unterman
(609) 936-9300
Program
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed 1989
Discontinued
Completed 1994
Completed 1994
Ongoing
Completed 1996
Completed 1996
Ongoing
Completed 1992
Completed 1994
Completed 1991
Exited
Completed 2000
               A-12

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
New Jersey
(continued)
New Mexico

Developer
M.L. ENERGIA,
Inc.
Princeton, NJ
M.L. ENERO1A,
Fnc.
Princeton, NJ
New Jersey
Institute of
Technology,
Hazardous
Substance
Management
Research Center
Newark, NJ
New Jersey
Institute of
Technology
Newark, NJ and
GeoTech
Development
Corporation
King of Prussia, PA
New Jersey
Institute of
Technology
Newark, NJ
Phytotech, Inc.
Monmouth, NJ
Sentex Sensing
Technology, Inc.
Ridgefield, NJ
Sohicorp
Saddle Back, NJ
Billings and
Associates, Inc.
Albuquerque. NM
Commodore
Advanced Sciences,
Inc.
Albuquerque, NM
Resource
Management and
Recovery (formerly
Bio-Recovery
Systems, Inc.)
Las Graces, NM
Sandia National
Laboratories
Albuquerque, NM
Technology
Reductive Photo-
Dechlorination
Treatment
Reductive
Photo-Thermal
Oxidation Processes
for Chlorocarbons
Pneumatic
Fracturing/
Bioremediation
Cold Top
Vitrification
GHEA Associates
Process
Phytoextraction of
metal from soil
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Molecular Bonding
System
Subsurface
Volatilization and
Ventilation System
Set Process for
PCBs in soil
AlgaSorb
Biological Sorption
Electrokinetic
Extraction in
Unsaturated Soils
Contact
Moshe Lavid
609-799-7970
Moshe Lavid
609-799-7970
John Schuring
201-596-5849
David Kosson
908-445-4346
William
Librizzi
201-596-5846
Thomas Tate
610-337-8515
Itzhak Gottlieb
201-226-4642
Burt Ensley
908-438-0900
Amos
Linenberg
201-945-3694
Robert Kuhn
914-623-2333
Gale Billings
505-345-1116
Don Brenneman
713-676-5324
Mark Jones
505-872-6803
Mike Hosea
505-382-9228
Eric Lindgren
505-844-3820
Earl Mattson
505-856-3311
Program
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Status
Completed 1995
Completed
Completed 1992
Exited
Completed 1992
Completed 1998
Completed 1992
Completed
Completed 1994
Completed 2000
Completed 1990
Completed 1999
               A-13

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
New Mexico
(continued)
New York
Ohio
Developer
Thermo Nutech
(formerly TMA
Eberline)
Albuquerque, NM
Photovac
International, Inc.
Deer Park, NY
SBP Technologies,
Inc.
White Plains, NY
RECRA
Environmental, Inc.
(formerly Electro-
Pure Systems, Inc.)
Amherst, NY
State University of
New York at
Oswego
Oswego, NY
Texaco Syngas, Inc.
White Plains, NY
Xerox Corporation
Webster, NY
ASC/EMR
Wright Patterson
AFB
Dayton, OH
Babock and Wilcox
Alliance Research
Center
Alliance, OH
Battelle Memorial
Institute
Columbus, OH
Commodore
Environmental
Columbus, Ohio
Technology
Segmented Gate
System for
Radioactive
Materials
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Bioventing, Air
Sparging,
Biological
Treatment for
Ground Water
(multi-developer
project with State of
New York)
Alternating Current
Electrocoagula-tion
Technology
Photocatalytic
Treatment for
Sediments
Gasification
Process
Ground Water
Extraction
Phytoremediation of
TCEin
Groundwater
Cyclone
Vitrification
In-situ
Electroacoustic Soil
Decontamination
Solvated Electron
Treatment of
Chlorinated
Organics
Contact
Jeff Brown
423-481-0683
Mark Collins
516-254-4199
Richard
Desrosiers
914-694-2280
Nick Kolak
518-457-3372
Kenneth
Kinecki
800-527-3272
Ronald
Scrudato
Jeffrey
Shiarenzelli
315-341-3639
John Winter
316-251-4000
ext. 536
Ron Hess
716-422-3694
Phil Mook
916-643-5443
Greg Harvey
513-255-7716
Lawrence King
216-829-7576
Satya Chauhan
614-424-4812
Neil Dronby
614-297-0365
Program
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Status
Completed
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
Completed 1994
Completed 1995
Completed 1998
Completed 1991
Completed
Completed 1996
              A-14

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State v
Ohio
(continued)

Developer
Ferro Corporation
Independence, OH
IT Corporation
Cincinnati, OH
IT Corporation
(formerly OHM
Remediation
Services Corp.)
Findlay, OH
Monsanto/ Dupont •
Cincinnati, OH
University of
Dayton Research
Institute
Dayton, OH
US EPA Mobile
Volume Reduction
Unit
Cincinnati, Ohio
U.S. EPANRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
U.S. EPANRMRL
and ETG
Environmental
Cincinnati, OH
U.S. EPA Risk
Reduction
Engineering
Laboratory and IT
Corporation
Cincinnati, OH
U.S. EPA Risk
Reduction
Engineering
Laboratory and
FRX, Inc.
Cincinnati, OH
U.S. EPA
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
Technology
Waste Vitrification
Through Electric
Melting
Chelation/
Electro-deposition
of Toxic Metals
from Soil
Oxygen
Microbubblc
In-situ
Bioremediation
In-situ
Electroosmosis of
TCE in soil/
Oroundwaters
"Lasagna Process"
Photothermal
Detoxification Unit
(PDU)
Soil Washing
Bioventing
Base-Catalyzed
Dechlorination
Process
Debris Washing
System
Hydraulic
Fracturing
Alternate Cover
Assessment
Program (ACAP)
Contact
S.K. Muralidhar
216-641-8580
Radha Krishnan
513-782-4700
Douglas Jerger
423-690-32 11
Thomas
Holdsworth
513-569-7675
Berry Dellinger
John Graham
513-229-2846
Richard Griffith
908-321-6629
Paul McCauley
513-569-7444
George
Huffman
513-569-7341
Yei-Shong
Shieh
215-832-0700
Michael Taylor
513-782-4700
William Slack
513-469-6040
Steve Rock
513-569-7149
Program
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
Completed
Completed 1998
Completed 1998
Completed 1994
Completed 1992
Completed 1997
Completed 1993
Completed 1990
Completed 1992
Completed 2001
               A-15

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Developer
Geo-Microbial
Technologies,
Ochelata, OK
Metorex, Inc.
Bend, OR
Aluminum
Company of
America (formerly
Alcoa Separations
Technology, Inc.)
Pittsburgh, PA
Calgon Carbon
Oxidation
Technologies
(formerly
Peroxidation
Systems, Inc.)
Pittsburgh, PA
Center for
Hazardous
Materials Research
Pittsburgh, PA
Center for
Hazardous
Materials Research
Pittsburgh, PA
Concurrent
Technologies
(formerly Center
for Hazardous
Materials Research)
Pittsburgh, PA
MacTec-SPB
Technologies
Company
Pittsburgh, PA
Geo-Con, Inc.
Monroeville, PA
2 Demonstrations
Horsehead
Resource
Development Co.
Inc.
Monaca, PA
Technology
Technology for
Metals Release and
Removal from
Wastes
Field Portable X-
Ray Fluorescence
(FPXRF)
Bioscrubber
Perox-Pur Chemical
Oxidation
Acid Extraction
Treatment System
Organics
Destruction and
Metals Stabilization
Lead Smelting
In Well Vapor
Stripping of Ground
Water
In-situ
Solidification/
Stabilization
Flame Reactor
Contact
Donald Hitzman
918-535-2281
Jim Pasmore
800-229-9209
541-385-6748
Paul Liu
412-826-3711
Bertrand
Dussert
412-787-6681
Stephe Paff
412-826-5321
B Stephe Paff
412-826-5321
Brian
Bosilovich
412-826-5321
Brian
Bosilovich
412-826-5321
Mark
McGlathery
800-444-6221
Linda Ward
Robert Hayden
412-856-7700
Regis Zagrocki
610-826-8810
Program
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measuring
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed 2001
Completed 1995
Completed 1993
Completed 1995
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
Completed 1993
Completed 1999
Completed 1988
Completed
               A-16

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Pennsylvania
(continued)
South Carolina
Tennessee

Developer
Lewis
Environmental
Services, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Strategic
Diagnostics, Inc.
Newtown, PA
Remediation
Technologies, Inc.
Pitsburgh, PA
R.E. Wright
Middletown, PA
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
West Chester, PA
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
West Chester, PA
Vortec Corp
Collegeville, PA
E&C Williams
Summerville, SC
University of South
Carolina
Columbia, SC
Bergmann USA
Gallatin, TN
Brown and Root
Environmental/
Illinois Institute of
Technology
Oak Ridge, TN
Technology
Soil Leaching
Process
Immunoassay for
PCP
Slurry
Biodegradation
Bioventing, Air
Sparging,
Biological
Treatment for
Ground Water
(multi-developer
project with state of
New York)
Thermal Desorption
Steam Regeneration
Adsorption System
(Ambersorb)
Oxidation and
Vitrification
Process
Chemical
Stabilization of
Mercury Mining
Wastes
In-situ Mitigation
of Acid Water
Soil and Sediment
Washing
Technology
Radio Frequency
Heating
Contact
Tom Lewis 111
412-322-8100
Craig
Kostyshyn
215-860-5115
ext. 634
David Nakles
412-826-3340
Richard Cronce
717-944-5501
Mike Cosmos
215-430-7423
John
Thoroughgood
610-701-3728
Deborah Plantz
215-537-4061
James Hnat
610-489-2255
Charlie
Williams 843-
821-4200
Frank Caruccio
803-777-4512
George Jones
615-230-2217
Clifton
Blanchard
423-483-9900
Program
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Exited
Completed 1993
Completed 1991
Completed 1992
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
Completed 1993
Exited
Completed 2001
Completed 1995
Completed 1992
Completed 1994
               A-17

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Tennessee
(continued)
Texas
Developer
IT Corporation
Knoxville, TN
IT Corporation
Knoxville, TN
WASTECH, Inc.
Oak Ridge, TN
Geokinetics and
Duke Engineering
EET, Inc.
Bellaire, TX
ENSR Consulting
Engineering and
Larson Engineering
Houston, TX
Filter Flow
Technology, Inc.
League City, TX
Fugro Geosciences,
Inc.
Houston, TX
Hanby
Environmental
Laboratory
Wimberly, TX
Hrubetz
Environmental
Services, Inc.
Dallas, TX
Technology
Batch Steam
Distillation and
Metal Extraction
Eimco Biolift
Slurry Reactor as
developed by
Tekno Associates
Mixed Waste
Treatment Process
Photocalytic and
Biological Soil
Detoxificaiton
Solidification/
Stabilization
Electrokinetic
Flushing &
Surfactant Flushing
PCB/Metals
Extraction from
Porous Surfaces
Bioventing, Air
Sparging,
Biological
Treatment for
Ground Water
(multi-developer
project with the
State of New York)
Colloid Polishing
Method
Laser Fluorescence
PAH, BTEX
Screening Cone
Penetrometer
PCP Test Kit
HRUBOUT Process
Contact
Stuart Shealy
423-690-3211
Kandi Brown
423-690-321 )
Ed Alperin
615-690-3211
Duane Graves
423-690-3211
Terrence Lyons
U.S. EPA
513-569-7859
Harry
Linnemeyer
512-425-2000
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Tim Tarrillion
713-662-0727
David Ramsden
(ENSR)
713-520-6802
N. Sathi-
yakumar
716-272-7310
Todd Johnson
713-334-6080
Andrew Taer
713-778-5580
John Hanby
512-847-1212
Barbara Hrubetz
Michael
Hrubetz
214-363-7833
Program
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measuring
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Status
Completed 1992
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
Completed 1993
Completed 1991
Completed 1999
Completed 1997
Completed 1995
Completed 1992
Completed 1996
Completed 1993
Completed 1993
               A-18

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Texas (continued)
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington

Developer
Solidtech, Inc.
Houston, TX
Star Organics
Dallas, TX
TN Spectrace
Round Rock, TX
Micro-Bac
International, Inc.
University of
Houston
Houston, TX
Western Product
Recovery Group,
Inc.
Houston, TX
Phytokinetics, Inc.
North Logan, UT
Green Mountain
Laboratories
BioGenesis
Enterprises, Inc.
Fairfax Station, VA
BWX Tech., Inc.
(Affiliate of
Babcock and
WilcoxCo.
Lynchburg, VA
Dynaphore, Inc.
Richmond, VA
ITT Industries
Roanoke, VA
ECOVA
Corporation
Redmond, WA
Geosafe
Corporation
Richland, WA
Technology
Solidification and
Stabilization
Injection Soil
Amendment
(Stabilization)
Portable X-Ray
Fluorescence
Spectrometer
Microbial
Degradation of
PCBs
Concentrated Salt
Extraction of Lead
CCBA Physical and
Chemical
Treatment
Phytoremediation of
Soils
Biodegradation of
PCBs in Soils
Soil Washing/
Biological
Treatment
Cyclone Furnace
Removal of
Dissolved Heavy
Metals via
FORAGER Sponge
Enhanced In-Situ
Bioremediation of
Chlorinated
Compounds
Bioslurry Reactor
In-situ Vitrification
Contact
Bill Stallworth
713-497-8558
Phil Clarke
214-522-0742
Peter Barry
512-388-9100
Todd Kenney
512-310-9000
Dennis Clifford
713-743-4266
Donald Kelly
713-493-9321
Bert Elkins
619-749-8856
Ari Ferro
801-750-0985
Adam Longee
802-223-1468
Charles Wilde
703-250-3442
Evan Reynolds
804-522-6000
Norman Rainer
804-288-7109
Rosann
Kryczkowski
540-362-7356
Alan Jones
206-883-1900
James Hansen
Matthew Haass
509-375-0710
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measuring
Technologies
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed 1988
Completed 1999
Completed 1995
Completed 2002
Completed 1999
Completed J994
Completed 1999
Completed 1999
Completed 2000
Completed 1992
Completed 1992
Completed 1991
Completed 1994
Completed 1999
Completed 1991
Completed 1994
              A-19

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Washington
(continued)
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Canada
Developer
Ionics/ Resources
Conservation Co.
Bellevue, WA
Keeco
Remediation
Technologies, Inc.
(ReTec) Seattle,
WA
Remediation
Technologies, Inc.
(ReTec) Seattle,
WA
Scitec Corporation
Richland, WA
University of
Washington
Seattle, WA
Wilder
Construction
Minergy
Svedala Industries
(formerly Allis
Mineral Systems)
Oak Creek, WI
US EPA/ NRMRL
US-DA Forest
Products Lab
Madison
University of
Wisconsin,
Madison, WI
Western Research
Institute
Laramie, WY
Atomic Energy of
Canada, Limited
Chalk River,
Ontario
Technology
BEST Solvent
Extraction
Chemical
Stabilization of
Mercury Mining
Wastes
Methanotrophic
Biofilm Reactor
Liquid and Soils
Biological
Treatment
Field Portable X-
Ray Fluorescence
Asdorptive
Filtration
Matcon Modified
Asphalt Cap
Thermal Sediment
Reuse Technology
Pyrokiln Thermal
Encapsulation
Process
Fungus Treatment
Technology
Photoelectro-
catalytic Treatment
of Metals and
Organics in Water
Contained
Recovery of Oily
Wastes (CROW)
Ultrasonic -Acid
Leachate
Treatment for
Mixed Wastes
Contact
William Mines
206-828-2400
Amy Anderson
888-977-9156
Hans Stroo
206-624-9349
Merv Cooper
206-624-9349
Steve Santy
800-466-5323
509-783-9850
Mark Benjamin
206-543-7645
W. Randall
Garrett
800-484-9404
Terry Carroll
920-727-1411
Jim Kidd
414-798-6341
Glenn Heian
414-762-1 190
Richard Lamar
608-231-9469
Marc Anderson
608-262-2674
Charles Hill, Jr.
608-263-4593
James Speight
307-721-2011
Shiv Vijayan
613-583-3311
ext. 3220/6057
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Status
Completed 1992
Completed 2001
Completed 1995
Completed 1 994
Completed 1995
Completed 1992
Completed 2001
Completed 2001
Completed 1993
Completed 1991
Completed
Completed 1991
Completed 1997
Completed
               A-20

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Canada
(continued)
Developer
Atomic Energy of
Canada, Limited
Chalk River,
Ontario
Cone Tech
Investigations
Vancouver, British
Colombia
ELI Ecologic
International, Inc.
Rockwood, Ontario
EnviroMetal
Technologies, Inc.
EnviroMetal
Technologies, Inc.
Guelph, Ontario
2 Demonstrations
Geosyntec
Guelph, Ontario
Grace Dearborn,
Inc.
Mississauga,
Ontario
Matrix
Photocatalytic
Limited (formerly
Nutech
Environmental)
London, Ontario,
Canada
Matrix
Photocatalytic
Limited
Toronto Harbour
Comission
Toronto, Ontario
Wastewater
Technology Centre
Burlington, Ontario
Zenon
Environmental
Systems, Inc.
Burlington, Ontario
Technology
Chemical
Treatment and
Ultrafiltration
Resistivity, pH,
Seismic,
Temperature, Cone
Penetrometer
Thermal Gas Phase
Reduction Process
and Thermal
Desorption
In Situ Reactive
Barrier
Metal Enhanced
Abiotic
Degradation
Emulsified Zero-
valent Iron for
DNAPL
Remediation
Daramend Process
TiO2 Photocatalytic
Treatment of
Aqueous Waste
Streams
TiO2 Photocatalytic
Air Treatment
Soil Recycling
Cross-Flow
Pervaporation
System
Bioreactor
Integrated with an
Ultrafiltration
Membrane System
Contact
Leo Buckley
613-584-3311
Ward Phillips
604-327-4311
Jim Nash
519-856-9591
John Vogan
519-824-0432
William
Matulewicz
609-722-6700
Suzanne O'Hara
519-822-2230
Alan Seech
Paul Bucen
905-272-7480
Bob Henderson
519-660-8669
Bob Henderson
519-660-8669
Dennis Lang
416-863-2047
Chris Lipski
905-639-6320
Lisa Ashton
905-639-6320
ext. 244
Program
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measuring
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Ex-situ
In-siru
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Status
Completed 1993
Completed 1992
Completed 1992
Completed 2000
Completed 1995
Completed
Ongoing
Completed 1994
Completed 1994
Completed 1995
Completed 1992
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
               A-21

-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Canada
(continued)
England/United
Kingdom
Italy
Puerto Rico
Developer
Zenon
Environmental
Systems, Inc.
Burlington, Ontario
Zenon
Environmental
Systems, Inc.
Burlington, Ontario
AEA Technology
(formerly Warren
Spring Laboratory)
Oxfordshire,
England
Graseby Ionics,
Limited
Waterford Herts,
England
Gruppo
Italimpresse
(developed by
Shirco Infrared
Systems, Inc.)
(formerly ECOVA)
Rome, Italy
2 Demonstrations
Terra Vac, Inc.
San Juan, PR
Technology
Cross- Flow
Pervaporation
System
ZenoGem Process
Physical and
Chemical
Treatment
Ion Mobility
Spectrometry
Infrared Thermal
Destruction
In-situ Vacuum
Extraction
Contact
Phil Canning
Tony Tonelli
905-639-6320
Chris Lipski
905-639-6320
Steve Barber
011-44-1235-
463062
John
Brokenshire
011-44-1923-
816166
Martin Cohen
561-683-0507
John Cioffi
206-883-1900
James Malot
787-725-8750
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Measuring and
Monitoring
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed 1995
Completed 1995
Completed 1994
Completed 1 990
Completed 1987
Completed
               A-22

-------
                 Appendix B
SITE TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES
   (Alphabetically by Demonstration Site State)
                    B-l

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
State
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Demonstration
Location
Fairbanks, AK,
ABE
Superfund Site
(Region 10)
Phoenix, AZ
Pesticide Site
(Region 9)
Phoenix, AZ
Pesticide Site
(Region 9)
Phoenix, AZ
Williams AFB
(Region 9)
Jefferson, AR
Incineration Research
Facility (IRF)
(Region 6)
Burbank, CA
Lockheed Site
(Region 9)
Clear Lake, CA
Technology
Soil Washing
Low
Temperature
Thermal Aeration
Anaerobic
Thermal
Processor
In-situ
Subsurface
Bioremediation
Tunable-Pulse
Combustion
Pyreton Burner
(Thermal
Destruction)
Integrated In-situ
Vapor Extraction
and Steam
Vacuum
Stripping Process
Biostabilization
of Mercury
Mining Wastes
Contact
Brice
Environmental
Services
Corporation
(BESCORP)
Fairbanks, AK
Craig Jones
907-452-2515
Smith
Environmental
Services (formerly
Canonie)
Englewood, CO
Joe Mutton
219-926-8651
Smith
Environmental
Services (formerly
Canonie)
Englewood, CO
Joe Mutton
219-926-8651
Bio-Rem
Butler, IN
David O. Mann
219-868-5823
Sonotech, Inc.
Atlanta, GA
Ben Zinn
404-894-3033
American
Combustion
Technologies
Norcross, GA
Gregory Gitman
404-564-4180
Radian
Corporation
(formerly AWD
Technologies,
Inc.)
Walnut Creek, CA
David Bluestein
415-227-0822
Pintail Systems,
Inc.
Aurora, CO
Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
Completed
Completed
1993
Completed
1995
Completed
1988
Completed
1990
Completed
                       B-2

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
California
(continued)

Demonstration
Location
Clear Lake, CA
Clear Lake, CA
Edwards AFB, CA
(Region 9)
Fresno, CA
Selma Site
(Region 9)
Fresno, CA
Selma Site
(Region 9)
Fullerton, CA
McColl Superfund
Site
(Region 9)
Huntington Beach,
CA
Rainbow Disposal
(Region 9)
Jackson, CA
Pintail Systems, Inc.
(Region 9)
Leviathan Mine Site
(Region 9)
Technology
Chemical
Stabilization of
Mercury Mining
Wastes
Chemical
Stabilization of
Mercury Mining
Wastes
CAV-OX
Oxidation
Process
Entrained-Bed
Gasfication
Silicate
Compounds by
Solidification/
Stabilizatioin
Excavation and
Foam
Suppression of
Volatiles
Steam Injection/
Vacuum
Extraction
(SIVE)
Biological
Stabilization of
Arsenic in Soils
Biphasic Lime
Treatment
Contact
Sevenson, W.C.
Munster, IN
Steve Chisick
219-836-0116
E&C Williams
Summerville, SC
Charlie Williams
84-821-4200
Magnum Water
Technology
El Segundo, CA
Dale Cox
310-640-7000
Texaco, Inc.
S. El Monte, CA
John Winter
310-908-7387
STC Omega
(formerly Silicate
Technology
Corporation)
Scottsdale, AZ
Steve Pegler
602-948-7100
U.S. EPA
Region 9
San Francisco, CA
Jon Blevins
415-744-2400
Hughes
Environmental
Manhattan Beach,
CA
(No longer a
vendor for SIVE)
Paul De Percin
U.S. EPA
513-569-7797
Pintail Systems,
Inc.
Aurora, CO
Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443
State of CA
Chris Stetier
530-542-5461
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Exited
Completed
2001
Completed
1993
Completed
1994
Completed
1990
Completed
1990
Completed
1993
Completed
2000
Ongoing
                             B-3

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
California
(continued)













Demonstration
Location
Leviathan Mine Site
(Region 9)

Leviathan Mine Site
(Region 9)
Livermore, CA
Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory
(LLNL)
(Region 9)

Livermore, CA
LLNL
(Region 9)


March AFB, CA
(Region 9)


Port Hueneme, CA
Naval Facilities
Engineering Service
Center
(Region 9)
Redding, CA
Iron Mountain
Superfund Site
Sacramento, CA
McClellan AFB
(Region 9)

Sacramento, CA
McClellan AFB
(Region 9)

Technology
Passive
Constructed
Wetlands

Lime Lagoons
Chemical
Oxidation
Perox-Pure

In-situ Enhanced
Extraction



In well Air
Stripping


Solvated Electron
Treatment of
Chlorinated
Organics
Precipitation,
Microfiltration,
Sludge
Dewatering
Photolytic
Destruction for
SVE Off-gases

Ground water
Extraction


Contact
University of NV,
Reno
Tim Tsukamoto
775-784-4413
ARCO
Barry Duff
406-563-5211
Calgon Carbon
Oxidation
Technologies
(formerly
Peroxidation
Systems, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Bertrand Dussert
412-787-6681
Berkley
Environmental
Restoration
(formerly Udell
Technologies,
Inc.)
Emeryville, CA
Kent Udell
510-653-9477
Roy Weston
Woodland Hills,
CA
Jeff Bannon
818-971-4900
Commodore
Environmental
Columbus, OH
Neil Dronby
614-297-0365
EPOC Water, Inc.
Fresno, CA
Scott Jackson
209-291-8144
Process
Technologies, Inc.
Boise, ID
Michael Swan
208-385-0900
Xerox Two Phase
Extraction
Webster, NY
Ron Hess
716-422-3694
Program
Demonstration

Demonstration
Demonstration


Demonstration



Demonstration


Demonstration

Demonstration

Demonstration

Demonstration


Status
Ongoing

Ongoing
Completed
1995


Completed
1993



Completed
1994


Completed
1996

Completed
1993

Exited

Completed
1995


                           B-4

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State

California
(continued)













































Demonstration
Location
San Diego, CA






San Diego, CA
Naval Air Station
North Island (NASNI)
(Region 9)


San Diego, CA
NASNI Site 9
(Region 9)




San Francisco, CA
Westin Hotel
(Region 9)


San Jose, CA
Lorentz Barrel and
Drum Site
(Region 9)


San Pedro, CA
Annex Terminal
(Region 9)



Santa Barbara, CA
Santa Marie Health
Care Services (UST
Site)
(Region 9)





Technology

Circulating Bed
Cumbuster





In Well Vapor
Stripping of
Ground Water



Cross-flow
Pervaporation
System for
Removal of
VOCs from
Oroundwater

CIS/KEY
Software for HW
Site
Data
Management
Ultraviolet
Ozone Treatment
for Liquids



In-situ Steam/
Air Stripping




Soil Washing/
Geological
Treatment







Contact

General Atomics
(formerlt Ogden
Environmental
Services)
San Diego, CA
Robert Goforth
619-455-2499
MACTEC
Environmental,
Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Mark McGlathery
800-444-6221
Zenon
Environmental,
Inc.
Burlington,
Ontario, Canada
Phil Canning
905-639-6320
GIS Solutions,
Inc.
Concord, CA
Garry Reid
510-827-5400
US Filter
(formerly Ultrox
International, Inc)
Santa Ana, CA
John Lowry
412-772-1247
Novaterra, Inc.
(formerly Toxic
Treatment, Inc.)
Torrance, CA
Phil La Mori
310-328-9433
BioGenesis
Enterprises
(formerly
BioVersal USA)
Fairfax Station,
VA
Charles Wilde
703-250-3442
Mohsen Amiran
708-827-0024
Program

Demonstration






Demonstration





Demonstration






Demonstration




Demonstration





Demonstration





Demonstration









Status

Completed
1989





Completed
1999




Completed
1995





Completed
1993



Completed





Completed
1989




Completed
1992








                             B-5

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
California
(continued)
Colorado
Demonstration
Location
South El Monte, CA
(Region 9)
Clear Creek, CO
Burleigh Tunnel
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
Rocky Flats
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
DOE Rocky Flats
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Technology
Gasification
Process
Wetland-Based
Treatment for
Mineral Mine
Drainage
Colloid Polishing
Method
Core Barrel Soil
Sampler
Dual Tube Liner
Soil Sampler
Electrocoa-
gulation
EMFLUX Soil
Gas Survey
System
Gore-Scrubber
Passive Soil Gas
Sampler
Contact
Texaco Syngas,
Inc.
White Plains. NY
John Winter
316-251-4000
ext. 536
Colorado
Department of
Health
Denver, CO
Jim Lewis
303-692-3390
Filter Flow
Technology
League City, TX
Tod Johnson
713-334-6080
Simulprobe
Technologies, Inc.
CA
Richard Laton
415-883-8787
Art's
Manufacturing and
Supply
American Falls,
ID
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
General
Environmental
Inc. (formerly
Hydrologies, Inc.)
Englewood, CO
Carl Dalrymple
303-761-6960
Quadrel Services,
Inc.
MD
Bruce Tucker
Paul Henning
301-874-5510
W. L. Gore and
Associates, Inc.
Elkton, MD
Ray
Fenstermacher
410-392-7600
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Status
Completed
1994
Completed
1999
Completed
1992
Completed
Completed
Completed
1995
Completed
Completed
                              B-6

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Colorado
(continued)
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Demonstration
Location
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Rocky Flats, CO
(Region 8)
Rocky Mountain
Arsenal, CO
(Region 8)
Rocky Mountain
Arsenal, CO
(Region 8)
Summitville, CO
(Region 8)
Roosevelt Mills
Vernon, CT
Dover, DE
(Region 3) &
Elgin, IL
(Region 5)
Brandon, FL
Peak Oil Superfund
Site
(Region 4)
Cape Canaveral, FL
(Region 4)
Technology
JMC
Environmentalist's
Subsoil Probe
Large Bore Soil
Sampler
In-situ Reactive
Barrier
Biological
Treatment, HRC
ofOrganics
In-Situ Thermal
Multiple
Innovative
Passive mine
Drainage
Technologies
Permanganate/
Persulfate
Oxidation
Treatment for
PCE
Matcon Modified
Asphalt Cap
Infrared
Incinerator
Dynamic
Underground
Stripping of TCE
Contact
Clements
Associates, Inc.
IA
Jim Clements
515-792-8285
Oeoprobe Systems
Salina, KS
Wesley McCall
TomOmli
800-436-7762
EnviroMetal
Technologies, Inc.
Guelph, Ontario
John Vogan
519-824-0432
Regenesis CA
Stephen
Koenigsberg
949-366-8000
Terra-Therm LLC
Ralph Baker
978-343-0300
Region 8 and Sate
of Colorado
Victor
Kettellapper
303-312-6578
Univ. of
Connecticut
George Hoag
860-486-2781
Wilder
Construction
Co., WA
W. Randall Garrett
800-484-9404
Grupo Italimprese
(Ecova Europa)
(formerly
ECOVA)
Rome, Italy
John Cioffi
206-883-1900
Integrated Water
Resources, Inc.
805-565-0996
Program
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
Completed
Completed
2000
Completed
2002
Completed
2002
Completed
2001
Ongoing
Completed
2001
Completed
1987
Completed
2002
                             B-7

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Florida
(continued)
Georgia
Hawaii
Demonstration
Location
Cape Canaveral, FL
(Region 4)
Hialeah, FL
General Electric
Service Shop
Pensacola, FL
American Creosote
Works
(Region 4)
Pensacola, FL
Escanbia Wood
Preserving Site
(Region 4)
Petroleum Products
Corporation
Miami, FL
Chickamuga, GA and
Hopkinsville, GA
(Region 4)
Warner Robins, GA
Robins AFB
(Region 4)
Pearl Harbor, HI
(Region 9)
Pearl Harbor, HI
Naval Facility
(Region 9)
Technology
Emulsified Zero-
valent Iron for
DNAPL
Remediation
In-situ
Solidification/
Stabilization
Filtration
Soil Washing
Oleofilter
Debris Washing
System
Stabilization of
Organics
PCB/Metals
Extraction from
Porous Surfaces
Electrokinetics
Contact
Geosyntec
Guelph, Ontario
Suzanne O'Hara
519-822-2230
Geo-Con, Inc.
Monroville, PA
Linda Ward
Robert Hayden
412-856-7700
SBP
Technologies, Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
Clayton Page
504-755-7711
U.S. EPA Mobile
Volume Reduction
Unit
Cincinnati, OH
Richard Griffith
908-321-6629
North American
Technologies
Aprotek
San Ramon, CA
Cathryn Wmberly
916-366-6185
U.S. EPA
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
Mike Taylor
512-782-4700
WASTECH, Inc.
Oak Ridge, TN
Benjamin Peacock
615-483-6515
EET Inc.
Bellaire, TX
Tim Tarrillion
713-662-0727
Geokinetics
CA
Steven
Clark
510-704-2940
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Ongoing
Completed
1988
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
Completed
Completed
1990
Completed
1991
Completed
1997
Completed
2000
                           B-8

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State

Hawaii
(continued)














Idaho









Illinois














Indiana




Demonstration
Location
Pearl Harbor, HI
Naval Facility
(Region 9)




Pearl Harbor, HI
Naval Facility
(Region 9



Pearl Harbor, HI
Naval Facility
(Region 9
Aberjona River



WEEL Lab





Chicago, IL
(Region 4)



Elgin, IL
(Region 5) &
Dover, DE
(Region 3)

Waukegan Harbor, IL
(Region 5)



Gary, IN
Indiana Harbour
(Region 5)


Technology

Electrokinetic
Flushing &
Surfactant
Flushing



Set Process for
PCBs in Soil




Closed Loop
Lead Recovery

Sediment Core
Sampler


Phytoremediation





Hydraulic
Fracturing



Matcon Modified
Asphalt Cap



Thermal
Desorption



Solvent
Extraction



Contact

Geokinetics and
Duke Engineering
TX
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Harry Linnemeyer
512-425-2000
Commodore
Advanced
Sciences, Inc.
Albuquerque, NM
Mark Jones
505-872-6803
Geokinetics CA
Stephen Clark
510-704-2940
Aquatic Research
ID
Will Young
(208) 768-2222
Argonne National
Laboratory
West Idaho Fall,
ID
Scott Lee
(208) 533-7829
U.S. EPA/
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
William Slack
513-469-6040
Wilder
Construction
Co., WA
W. Randall Garrett
800-484-9404
SoilTech, ATP
Systems Inc.
Porter, IN
Joe Hutton
219-926-8651
Ionics/Resources
Conservation, Co.
Bellevue, WA
Bill Hines
206-828-2400
Program

Demonstration






Demonstration





Demonstration


Monitoring and
Measurements


Demonstration





Demonstration




Demonstration




Demonstration




Demonstration




Status

Completed
1999





Completed
2000




Completed
2002

Completed



Ongoing





Completed
1992



Completed
2001



Completed
1992



Completed
1992



                             B-9

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Demonstration
Location
Albert City, [A
(Region 7)
Albert City, 1A
(Region 7)
Albert City, IA
(Region 7)
Albert City, IA
(Region 7)
Albert City, IA
(Region 7)
Albert City, 1A
(Region 7)
Bendena, KS
(Region 7)
Paducah, KY
Gaseous Diffustion
Plant
(Region 4)
DOE- Paducah, KY
Technology
Core Barrel Soil
Sampler
Dual Tube Liner
Soil Sampler
EMFLUX Soil
Gas Survey
System
Gore-Scrubber
Passive Soil Gas
Sampler
JMC
Environmentalist's
Subsoil Probe
Large Bore Soil
Sampler
Biological
Denitrification
In-situ
Electroosmosis
of TCE in Soil/
Groundwaters
"Lasagna"
Process
Oxidation and
Vitrification
Process
Contact
Simulprobe
Technologies, Inc.
CA
Richard Laton
415-883-8787
Art's
Manufacturing and
Supply
American Falls,
ID
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
Quadrel Services,
Inc.
MD
Bruce Tucker
Paul Henning
301-874-5510
W. L. Gore and
Associates, Inc.
Elkton, MD
Ray
Fenstermacher
410-392-7600
Clements
Associates, Inc. .
IA
Jim Clements
515-792-8285
Geoprobe Systems
Salina, KS
Wesley McCall
Tom Omli
800-436-7762
Eco Mat, Inc.
Hayward, CA
Kim Halley
510-783-5885
Monsanto/Dupont
OH
Thomas
Holdsworth
513-569-7675
Vortec
Corporation
Collegeville, PA
James Hnat
610-489-2255
Program
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Status
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
2000
Completed
1998
Completed
1993
                           B-10

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Louisiana
Maine
Massachusetts
Demonstration
Location
Fort Polk, LA
(Region 6)
Lake Charles, LA
Loring AFB
Caribou, ME
(Region I)
Boston, MA
(Region 1)
Boston, MA
(Region 1)
Grafton, MA
(Region 1)
Groveland, MA
Groveland Wells
Superfiind Site
New Bedford, MA
(Region 1)
New Bedford, MA
(Region I)
Technology
Electrokinetic
Extraction
Evaporation and
Chemical
Oxidation
In-situ Thermal
(Steam Injection)
AMS Split Core
Sampler
Russian Peat
Borer
Anerobic-aerotic
Biorcmcdiation
In-situ Vacuum
Extraction
Batch Organics
Extraction Unit
Solvent
Extraction
Contact
Electrokinetics,
Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
Elif Acar
504-388-3992
Wheelbrator Clean
Air Systems
(formerly
Chemical Waste
Management)
Schaumburg, IL
Bob Hernquist
708-706-6900
Steam Tech
Environmental
Services
Bakersfield, CA
Hank Sowers
661-322-6478
Art's
Manufacturing and
Supply
ID
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
Aquatic Research
Instruments
ID
Will Young
208-768-2222
Harding-Lawson
Enginners, MA
Willard Murray
781-245-6606
Terra Vac, Inc.
San Juan, PR
James Malot
787-725-8750
CF Systems
Corporation
Arvada, CO
L.V. Benningfield
303-420-1550
CF Systems
Corporation
Arvada, CO
L.V. Benningfield
303-420-1550
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Exited
Completed
Ongoing
Completed
1999
Completed
Ongoing
Completed
Completed
Completed
1988
                            B-ll

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Massachusetts
(continued)
Michigan
Demonstration
Location
North Dartsmouth,
MA
Resolve Superfund
Site
(Region 1)
Adrian, MI
Anderson
Development
(Region 5)
Bay City, Ml
Bay City Municipal
Landfill
(Region 5)
Buchanan, MI
Electro- Voice
(Region 5)
Detroit, Ml
(Region 5)
Essexville, Ml
Saginaw Bay
Confined Disposal
Facility
(Region 5)
Grand Ledge, MI
Parsons Chemical Site
(Region 5)
Rose Township, MI
(Region 5)
Technology
Thermal
Desorption
Thermal
Desorption
(physical)
Thermal Gas
Phase Reduction
Process and
Thermal
Desorption
Subsurface
Volatilization
and Ventilation
System (SVVS)
Debris Washing
System
Sediment Soil
Washing
In-situ
Vitrification
Infrared
Incinerator
Contact
OHM
Environmental
(formerly
Chemical Waste
Management Inc.)
Lombarda, FL
Dick Ayen
803-846-2413
Roy F. Weston,
Inc.
West Chester, PA
Michael Cosmos
215-430-7423
ELI Eco Logic
International, Inc.
Rockwood,
Ontario,
Canada
Jim Nash
519-856-9591
Billings &
Associates, Inc.
Albuquerque, NM
Gale Billings
505-345-1116
U.S. EPA/
NRMRL
Cincinnati, Ohio
Donald Sanning
513-569-7444
Bergmann, USA
Gallatin, TN
George Jones
615-230-2217
Geosafe
Corporation
Richland, WA
James Hansen
509-375-0710
Grupo Italimprese
(Ecova Europa)
(formerly
ECOVA)
Jon Cioffi
206-883-1900
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
Completed
1994
Completed
1990
Completed
1992
Completed
1994
Completed
1987
                             B-12

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State

Michigan
(continued)



Minnesota

































Mississippi






Demonstration
Location
St. Joseph, MI




McGillis & Gibbs
Superfund Site
New Bridge, MN
(Region 5)

McGillis & Gibbs
Superfund Site
New Bridge, MN
(Region 5)
McGillis & Gibbs
Superfund Site
New Bridge, MN
(Region 5)

Minneapolis, MN
Private Oil Refining
Company
(Region 5)






New Brighton, MN
Twin Cities Army
Ammunition Plant
(TCAAP)
(Region 5)
St. Louis Park, MN
(Region 5)



Brookhaven, MS
Brookhaven Wood
Preserving
(Region 4)



Technology

Submerged
Aerobic Fixed
Film Reactor


Biotreatment of
Groundwater



Soil Washing



Biological
Aqueous
Treatment
System

Soil Washing/
Biological
Treatment







Removal of Lead
from Soils



Bioventing
(air-injection)



Fungus
Treatment
Technology




Contact

Allied Signal
Corporation
Des Plains, IL
Steve Lupton
708-391-3500
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie,
MN
Dennis Chilcote
612-942-8032
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
Dennis Chilcote
612-942-8032
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie,
MN
Dennis Chilcote
612-942-8032
BioGenesis
Enterprises, Inc.
(formerly
BioVersal USA)
Fairfax Station,
VA
Charles Wilde
703-250-3442
Mohsen Amiran
708-827-0024
COGNIS
TARRAMET
Goss, MO
Lou Magdits
573-626-3476
U.S.
EPA/NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
Paul McCauley
513-569-7444
U.S.
EPA/NRMRL
USDA-Forest
Products Lab
Madison, Wl
Richard Lamar
608-231-9469
Program

Demonstration




Demonstration





Demonstration


Demonstration




Demonstration









Demonstration




Demonstration




Demonstration






Status

Completed




Completed
1989



Completed
1989


Completed
1989



Completed
1992








Completed
1994



Completed
1997



Completed
1991





                           B-13

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Demonstration
Location
Butte, MT
Butte-Silverbow Site
(Region 8)
Butte, MT
(Region 8)
Mike Horse Mine, MT
(Region 8)
St. Louis, MT
Welldon Spring
(Region 7)
Hastings, NE
(Region 7)
Battle Mountain, NV
(Region 9)
Milford, NH
Savage Superfund Site
(Region 1)
Plaistow, NH
(Region 1)
Edison, NJ
EPA
(Region 2)
Technology
Plasma Heat
Chemical
Stabilization of
Mercury Mining
Waste
Grouting
Technique
Anaerobic
Biological
Destruction of
TNT in Soil
Spray Irrigation
Biodegradation
of Cyanide
Surfactant
Enanced Aquifer
Remediation
Biodegradation
ofPCB'sinSoils
Solvent
Extraction
Carver-
Greenfield
Process
Contact
Retech, Inc.
Ukiah, CA
R.C. Eschenback
707-462-6522
E&C Williams,
SC
Charlie Williams
843-821-4200 and
Keeco, WA
Amy Anderson
888-977-9156
Morrison Knudsen
Corporation
Boise, ID
Kathryn Levihn
Rick Raymond!
208-386-6115
J.R. Simplot
Company
Pocatelto, ID
Tom Yergovich
209-858-2511
University of
Nebraska-
Lincoln Hasting,
NE
Ray Spalding
402-783-3931
Pintail Systems,
Inc.
Aurora, CO
Caren Caldwell
303-367-8443
U.S. DOE. Duke
Engineering
G. Michael Shook
208-526-6945
Green Mountain
Laboratories
Montpelier, VT
Adam Longee
802-223-1468
Dehydro Tech
Corporation
East Hanover, NJ
Theodore
Trowbridge
908-904-1606
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1991
Completed
2001
Completed
1996
Completed
1994
Completed
1996
Completed
1998
Completed
1999
Completed
2000
Completed
1991
                             B-14

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State

New Jersey
(continued)








































New Mexico




Demonstration
Location
Hillsborough, N.I
(Region 2)






Millville, NJ
Nascoilte Site
(Region 2)





Millville, NJ
Nascoilte Site
(Region 2)




Morganville, NJ
Imperial Oil Co., Inc.
Site
(Region 3)
Pedricktown, NJ
National Lead
Industries
(Region 2)

Trenton, NJ
(Region 2)


Wayne, NJ
(Region 2)




Albuquerque, NM
(Region 6)



Technology

Pneumatic
Fracturing,
Extraction and
Hot Gas Injection




Bioreactor
Integrated with
an Ultrafiltration
Membrane
System



ZenoGem
Process





Solidification



Removal of
Dissolved Metals



Phytoextraction
of Metal from
Soil

Ex-situ Metal-
enhanced Abiotic
Degradation



Electrokenitic
Extraction in
Unsaturated Soils


Contact

Accutech, Inc.
Keyport NJ &
New Jersey
Institute of
Technology,
Newark, NJ
John Liskowitz
908-739-6444
Zenon
Environmental,
Inc.
Burlington,
Ontario, Canada
Lisa Ashton
905-639-6320
ext. 244
Zenon
Environmental,
Inc.
Burlington,
Ontario, Canada
Chris Lipski
905-639-6320
Solidtech, Inc.
Houston, TX
Bill Stallworth
713-497-8558
Dynaphore/
Forager Sponge
Richmond, VA
Norman Rainer
804-288-7109
Phytotech, Inc.
Monmouth, NJ
Burt Ensley
908-438-0900
EnviroMetal
Technologies, Inc.
Guelph, Ontario
William
Matulewicz
609-722-6700
Sandia National
Laboratories,
Albuquerque, NM
Eric Lindgren
505-844-3820
Program

Demonstration







Demonstration







Demonstration






Demonstration



Demonstration




Demonstration



Demonstration





Demonstration




Status

Completed
1992 .






Completed
1995






Completed






Completed
1988


Completed
1994



Completed
1998


Completed
1995




Completed
1999



                            B-15

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State

New York













































Demonstration
Location
Brant, NY
Wide Beach
(Region 2)


Broekport, NY
Sweden-3 Chapman
Site
(Region 2)





Niagara Falls, NY
(Region 2)











Upstate NY
(Region 2)



Utica, NY
(Region 2)





Utica, NY
Town Gas Site
(Region 2)




Technology

Thermal
Desorptkm
Dechlori nation


Biovault,
Bioventing
and Groundwater
Circulation
Biological
Treatment
Process
(multi-developer
project)
Cold Top
Vitrification











In-situ Metal-
enhanced Abiotic
Degredation


High
Temperature
Thermal
Processor



Slurry
Biodegradation





Contact

SoilTech, ATP
Systems, Inc.
Porter, IN
Joe Mutton
219-926-8651
NY State
Bioremediation
and SBP
Technologies, Inc.
White Plains, NY
Clayton Page
504-755-771 1


New Jersey
Institute of
Technology
(NJIT)
Newark, NJ and
Geo Tech
Development
Corporation, King
of Prussia, PA
William Librizzi
201-596-5846
Thomas Tate
610-337-8515
EnviroMetal
Technologies, Inc.
Guelph, Ontario
John Vogan
519-824-0432
Maxymillian
Technologies, Inc.
(Formerly Clean
Berkshires)
Lanesboro, MA
Jim Maxymillian
413-499-3050
Remediation
Technologies Inc.
(ReTec) (formerly
Mo Tec Inc.)
Pitsburgh, PA
David Nakles
412-826-3340
Program

Demonstration




Demonstration








Demonstration












Demonstration




Demonstration






Demonstration






Status

Completed
1992



Completed
1995







Exited












Completed




Completed
1993





Completed
1991





                            B-16

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
North Carolina
Ohio

Demonstration
Location
Morrisville, NC
Koppers Site
(Region 4)
Aliance,OH
Babcock & Wilcox
Alliance Research
Center
(Region 5)
Cincinnati, OH
EPA T&E Facility
(Region 5)
Crooksville, OH
Pintail Systems, Inc.
(Region 5)
Dayton, OH
(Region 5)
DOE Femald Facility,
OH
(Region 5)
Roseville/
Crooksville, OH
Roseville/
Crooksville, OH
Technology
Base-Cataly/ed
Destruction
(Dehalogenation)
Cyclone
Vitrification
Bioslurry Reactor
Biostabilization
of Lead
Hydraulic
Fracturing
Solvent
Extraction
Envirobond Soil
Amendment
(Stabilization)
Injection Soil
Amendment
(Stabilization)
Contact
U.S. EPA/
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
George Huffman
513-569-7341
Environmental
Inc.
Blue Bell, PA
Yei-Shong Shieh
215-832-0700
Babeock &
Wilcox Alliance
Research Center
Alliance, OH
Lawrence King
216-829-7576
ECOVA
Corporation
Redmond, WA
Alan Jones
206-883-1900
Pintail Systems,
Inc.
Aurora, CO
Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443
U.S. EPA/
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
William Slack
513-469-6040
Terra Kleen
Corporation (name
changed back
from Sevenson
Extraction
Technology, Inc.)
Del Mar, CA
Alan Cash
619-558-8762
Rocky Mountain
Remedation
Services
Jim Barthel
303-215-6620
Star Organics
Phil Clarke
214-522-0742
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1993
Completed
1991
Completed
1991
Completed
2000
Completed
1992
Completed
1997
Completed
Completed
                          B-17

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
Demonstration
Location
Clackamas, OR
Portable Equipment
Co. Site
(Region 10)
Douglassville, PA
(Region 3)
Monaca, PA
Palmerton, PA
Palmerton Zinc Pile
(Region 3)
Stroudsburg, PA
(Region 3)
Central Landfill,
Rl
(Region 1 )
N. Smithfield, RI
(Region 1)
Technology
Chemical
Fixation/
Stabilization
Solidification/
Stabilization
Flame Reactor
Membrane
Microfiltration
Contained
Recovery of Oil
Wastes
Reverse
Osmosis: Disc-
Tube Module
Technology
AIR 11
Photocatalytic
Technology for
Air Streams
Contact
Advanced
Remediation
Mixing, Inc.
(formerly Chemfix
Technologies,
Inc.)
Metarie, LA
Sam Pizzitola
504-461-0466
Hazcon and
Funderburk &
Associates)
Apollo Beach, FL
Ray Funderburk
813-645-9620
Horsehead
Resource
Development Co.,
Inc.
Regis Zagrocki
610-826-8810
E.I. DuPont
DeNemours &
Company
Newark, DE
Oberlin Filter
Company
Waukesha, Wl
Ernest Mayer
302-774-2277
Western Research
Institute
Laramie, WY
James Speight
307-721-2011
ROCHEM
Separations, Inc.
Torrence, CA
David LaMonica
310-370-3160
KSE, Inc.
Amhurst, MA
James Kittrell
413-549-5506
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1989
Completed
1987
Completed
Completed
1990
Completed
1997
Completed
1994
Completed
1999
                           B-18

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State

South Carolina








Tennessee









Texas






















Demonstration
Location
Savannah River Site,
SC
(Region 4)






Oak Ridge, TN
(Region 4)



Oak Ridge, TN
DOE Oak Ridge
Facility
(Region 4)

Fort Worth, TX
Carswell AFB
(Region 6)



Goldthwaite, TX
Lower Colorado River
Authority Electrical
Substation
Goldthwaite, TX
(Region 6)




San Antonio, TX
Kelly AFB
(Region 6)




Technology

High Energy
Irradiation for
Destruction of
Organics in
Aqueous
Solutions and
Sludge


Photocatalytic
Aqueous Phase
Organics
Destruction
Matrix
Freeze Barrier




Phytoremediation
of TCE in
Groundwater



Microbial
Degradation/
Solvant
Extraction
Microbial
Degradation of
PCBs



Hot Air Injection






Contact

High Voltage
Environmental
Application, Inc.
Florida
and International
University Miami,
FL
William Cooper
910-962-3450
Matrix, Inc.
London, ON
Robert Henderson
519-660-8669

Arctic
Foundations
Anchorage, AK
Ed Yarmak
907-562-2741
ASC/EMR
Wright Patterson
AFB
Dayton, Ohio
Greg Harvey
513-255-7716
Envirogen, Inc.
Lawrenceville, NJ
Ronald Unterman
609-936-9300
Micro-BAC Int.,
TX
512-310-9000
X- 19 Biological
Products, CA
408-970-9485
Hrubetz
Evironmental
Services, Inc.
Dallas, TX
Michael or
Barbara Hrubetz
214-363-7833
Program

Demonstration








Demonstration




Demonstration




Demonstration





Demonstration



Demonstration





Demonstration






Status

Completed
1994







Completed
1995



Completed
1998



Completed
1998




Completed
2000


Completed
2002




Completed
1993





                            B-19

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Texas
(continued)
Utah
Virginia
Washington
Demonstration
Location
San Antonio, TX
Kelly AFB
(Region 6)
San Antonio, TX
Kelly AFB
(Region 6)
Hill AFB, UT
(Region 8)
Midvale Slag, UT
Ogden, UT
Chevron Transfer
Facility
(Region 8)
Roanoke, VA
ITT Night Vision
Facility
(Region 3)
Ellensburg, WA
(Region 10)
Whatcom Waterway
Bellingham, WA
Ridgefield, WA
(Region 10)
Technology
Radio-
frequency
Heating
Radio-
frequency
Heating
Steam Injection/
Vacuum
Extraction
Molecular
Bonding System
Phytoremediation
of Petroleum in
Soil and
Groimdwater
Enhanced In-situ
Bioremediation
of Chlorinated
Compounds
Anaerobic
Biological
Destruction of
Dinoseb in Soil
Electrochemical
Geooxidation
Steam Enhanced
Remediation
Contact
11TRI/NUS
IITRI-Chicago, IL
and Haliburton/
NUS
Oak Ridge, TN
Clifford Blanchard
615-483-9900
KAI/HNUS
Oak Ridge, TN
Cliff Blanchard
615-483-9900
Praxis
Environmental
Services
San Francisco, CA
Dr. Lloyd Steward
415-641-9044
Solucorp
Saddleback, NJ
Robert Kuhn
914-623-2333
Phytokinetics, Inc.
Logan, UT
Ari Ferro
801-750-0985
ITT Industries
Roanoke, VA
Rosann
Kryczkowski
540-362-7356
J. R. Simplot
Company
Pocatello, ID
Tom Yergovich
209-858-2511
Weiss Associates
Joe Lovenitti
Steam Tech
Environmental
Services
Bakersfield, CA
Hank Sowers
661-322-6478
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1994
Completed
1994
Completed
1997
Completed
Completed
1999
Completed
1999
Completed
July
1993
Ongoing
Ongoing
                           B-20

-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State

Wisconsin























Various locations
in U.S.

Canada











Demonstration
Location
Fox River, WI
(Region 5)

Green Bay, WI
(Region 5)




Green Bay, WI
(Region 5)



Sparta, WI
U.S. DOD
Fort McCoy
(Region 5)


Jones Island CDF
Milwaukee, WI
(Region 5)

10 sites around the
nation

Toronto, Canada
Toronto Port
Industrial Division


Trenton, Ontario
Domtar Wood
Preserving Site




Technology

Thermal
Sediment Reuse
Technology
AMS Split Core
Sampler




Russian Peat
Borer



MAECTITE*
Treatment
Process



Phytoremediation



Alternate Cover
Assessment
Program (ACAP)
Treatment Train
for Contaminated
Soils


Bioremediation






Contact

Minergy, WI
Terry Carroll
920-727-141 1
Art's
Manufacturing and
Supply
ID
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
Aquatic Research
Instruments
ID
Will Young
208-768-2222
Sevenson
Environmental
Services, Inc.
Munster, IN
Chuck McPheeters
219-836-0116
Army Corps of
Engineers
(Vicksburg, MS
and Detroit MI)
U.S. EPA
NRMRL

Toronto Harbor
Commissioners
Toronto, Canada
Dennis Lang
416-863-2047
GRACE
Bioremediation
Technologies
Mississauga,
Ontario, Canada
Alan Seech
905-272-7480
Program

Demonstration


Monitoring and
Measurement




Monitoring and
Measurement



Demonstration





Demonstration



Demonstration


Demonstration




Demonstration






Status

Completed
2001

Completed
1999




Completed




Completed
2000




Ongoing



Completed
2001

Completed
1992



Completed
1994





                             B-21

-------

-------
                  Appendix C






ELECTRONIC TECHNICAL INFORMATION RESOURCES
                     C-l

-------
                                                CONTENTS

Section                                                                                                 Page

REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES	C-3

        Electronic information Sources  	C-3

               Innovative Remediation Technologies: Field-Sectors Demonstration Projects in North America, Second
                       Edition and Database	 C-3
               Hazardous Waste Clean-Up Information (CLU-IN) Home Page	C-3
               Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report (Tenth Edition) EPA 542/R-01-004     . . . C-3
               EPA Technologies (EPA REACH IT)	C-3
               Site Remediation Technology Infobase	C-3
               Cost and Performance Catalog of Case Studies	C-4
               Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide, Version 3.0	C-4
               TechDirect	C-4

        Programs, Partnerships, And Organizations	C-4

               EPA Library Network Program	C-4
               Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR)	C-4
               Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center (GWRTAC)	C-4
               Office of Research and Development (ORD)  	C-4
               Remediation Technologies Development Forum (RTDF)	C-5
               Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Demonstration Program  	C-5
               Interstate Technology Regulatory Cooperative (1TRC)
               Technology Innovation Program (TIP)  	C-5

SITE CHARACTERIZATION TECHNOLOGIES	C-5

        Electronic Sources of Information	C-5

               EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory - Hazardous Waste
               Site Characterization (on CD-ROM) (EPA 600-C-96-001)	C-5
               Field Sampling and Analysis Technologies Matrix	C-6
               TechDirect	C-6

        Programs, Partnerships, and Organizations	C-6

               Consortium for Site Characterization and Technology (CSCT)  	C-6
               Environmental Technology Verification Program	C-6
               EPA Library Network Program	C-6
               Office of Research and Development (ORD)  	C-6
               Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Demonstration Program	C-6
               Technology Innovation Program (TIP)  	C-7
                                                    C-2

-------
                                          EPA Sources of Information on
                          Innovative Remediation and Site Characterization Technologies
        Listed below are U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sources of information on Innovative Remediation
and Site Characterization Technologies. Sources of information include:  electronic information sources in the form of
databases or Internet sites, as well as programs, partnerships and organizations accessible on the Internet.
         REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES

Electronic Information Sources

Innovative Remediation Technoliges: Field-Scale
Demonstration Projects in North America, Second
Edition and Database.  The searchable database contains
information about 600 completed innovative technology
field demonstration projects in North America. The
purpose of the database is to consolidate key information
from innovative demonstration projects into a  single source
and present that information in a format that enables the
user to easily identify innovative technologies that may be
appropriate to the user's particular site remediation needs.
The database, which is limited to completed demonstration
projects and a small number of full-scale cleanup efforts,
does not include emerging technologies or laboratory-scale
projects. A summary report, EPA 542-BOO/004 of the
same name is available from EPA's National Service
Center for Environmental Publications or accessed free of
charge from  the CLU-IN Internet site at .

Hazardous Waste Clean-Up Information (CLU-IN)
Home Page.  CLU-IN is a streamlined source  of
information about innovative remediation and  site
characterization technologies for hazardous waste cleanup
professionals.  It provides access to information about
programs, organizations, publications, and other tools for
EPA and other Federal and State personnel, consulting
engineers, technology developers and venders, remediation
contractors, researchers, community groups, and individual
citizens.  Access to various pools of information is
presented in the form of downloadable publications and
databases. Sources of additional information on  the
Internet also are presented through a series of links. CLU-
IN is sponsored by EPA's Technology Innovation Office
(TIO). For additional information about the CLU-IN home
page, call (301) 589-5318. CLU-IN can be accessed
through the Internet at .

Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status
Report (ASR) Eleventh Edition EPA/542/R-03/009 and
ASR Search System. This report contains information
about remedies selected at contaminated waste sites. The
sites include  Superfund remedial and removal sites and
some non-Superfund sites being remediated by the  U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE), the U.S. Department of
Defense (DoD), or under the RCRA corrective action
 program.  The ASR online site cleanup information system
 includes Superfund site-specific data such as remedy
 selected, contaminants and media treated, project status, and
 site contact. The online database  is available at
 http://cfpub.epa.gov/asr.  If you have questions or comments
 about the system, please call EPA's TIP at (703) 603-9904.
 The report can be ordered or downloaded free of charge from
 the CLU-IN Internet site at . To order
 a copy of the report by phone, call EPA's National Service
 Center for Environmental Publications  at (800) 490-9198 or
 (513)489-8190.

 EPA Remediation and Characterization Innovative
 Technologies (EPA REACH IT). EPA REACH IT,
 sponsored by EPA's Technology Innovation Program (TIP),
 is a system that lets environmental professionals use the
 power of the Internet to search,  view, download, and print
 information about innovative remediation and
 characterization technologies. EPA REACH IT provides
 information about more than 750 service providers that offer
 almost 1,300 remediation technologies and more than 150
 characterization technologies. EPA REACH IT combines
 information from three established EPA databases, the
 Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment
 Technologies (VISITT), the Vendor Field Analytical and
 Characterization Technologies System (Vendor FACTS), and
 the Innovative Treatment Technologies (ITT), to give users
 access to comprehensive information about treatment and
 characterization technologies and their applications. It
 combines information submitted by technology service
 providers about remediation and characterization
 technologies with information from EPA, the U.S.
 Department of Defense (DoD), the U.S. Department of
 Energy (DOE), and state project managers about sites at
 which innovative technologies are being deployed. EPA
 REACH IT can be accessed through the Internet at
 . It is best viewed using
 Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Internet Explorer, version
 4.0 or higher.

 Site Remediation Technology Infobase.  The Site
 Remediation Technology Infobase was founded by EPA and
 prepared for the federal agencies participating in the Federal
 Remediation Technologies Roundtable. It provides
 information on federal cleanup programs; federal site
remediation technology development assistance programs,
and databases; federal electronic resources for site
remediation; other electronic resources for site remediation
technology information; a bibliography of selected federal
                                                      C-3

-------
publications on alternative and innovative site remediation
technologies; technology survey reports; and technology
program contacts for DOD, DOE, and EPA.  It can be
accessed through the Internet at:
.

Cost and Performance Catalog of Case Studies. The
Cost and Performance Catalog of Case Studies is a joint
effort of Federal Remediation  Technologies Roundtable
members to publish case study reports on full- and
demonstration-scale remediation projects. As of May
2001, member agencies of the Roundtable have completed
274  cost and performance case study reports. The reports
(March 1995-May 2001) can be accessed by the Cost and
Performance Case Studies Search:
.

Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and
Reference  Guide, Version 3.0.  The Remediation
Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide,
Version 3.0, prepared for federal agencies participating on
the Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable (FRTR),
provides a "yellow pages" of remediation technologies
information. The guide is intended to assist remedial
project managers (RPM) to screen and evaluate candidate
cleanup technologies and select the best remedial
alternative(s) for contaminated installations, facilities, or
waste sites. The guide also assists environmental
professionals in gathering essential descriptive information
on the respective technologies. The guide incorporates
cost  and performance data to the maximum extent available
and focuses primarily on demonstrated technologies.
However, information on emerging technologies also is
included in the guide.  The guide can be accessed through
the Internet at .

TechDirect. TechDirect, hosted by EPA's TIP,  is an
information service that highlights new publications and
events of interest to environmental professionals.
Information about site characterization and remediation
technologies is available through this Internet subscription
service. Once a month, the service distributes by electronic
mail a message describing the  availability of publications
and announcements of events.  For publications, the
message explains how to obtain a hard copy or how to
download an electronic version from the Internet. For
additional information about TechDirect, contact Jeff
Heimerman at (703) 603-7191  or by E-mail at
heimerman.jeff@epamail.epa.gov.  TechDirect can be
accessed through the Internet at .
Programs, Partnerships, And Organizations

EPA Library Network Program. The EPA National
Library Network Program is a repository of information
from EPA's Headquarters, Regional and Field Offices,
Research Centers, and specialized laboratories throughout
the country. The Library Network provides access to its
collection through the On-line Library System (OLS), a
menu-driven database of the library's holdings.  The OLS
provides users with the ability to perform online searches by
author, title, or keyword. The EPA National Library
Network Program can be accessed through the Internet at
.

Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR).
FRTR is an interagency working group that provides a forum
for the exchange of information regarding the development
and demonstration of innovative technologies for the
remediation of hazardous waste sites. The forum also
synthesizes the technical knowledge that Federal Agencies
have compiled and provides a more comprehensive record of
performance and cost of the technologies.  Participating
agencies include DoD, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Air Force, DOE, the U.S. Department
of the Interior, and EPA. FRTR can be accessed through the
Internet at .

Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis
Center (GWRTAC). GWRTAC was established through a
cooperative agreement between the National Environmental
Technology Applications Center (NETAC) of the Center for
Hazardous Materials Research (CHMR) and EPA. The goal
of GWRTAC is to compile, analyze,  and disseminate
information about innovative ground-water remediation
technologies to industry, the research community,
contractors, government, investors, and the public. The
center currently is compiling information to be included in
databases of interactive case studies and vendor information
that will be available on the GWRTAC Internet site.
GWRTAC can be accessed through the Internet at
.

Office of Research and  Development (ORD).  ORD, under
the Assistant Administrator, Paul Oilman, Ph. D., is the
scientific and technological arm of EPA. Comprised of three
headquarters offices, three national research laboratories and
two national centers, ORD is organized around a basic
strategy of risk assessment and risk assessment management
to remediate environmental and human health problems.
ORD focuses on the advancement of basic peer-reviewed
scientific research and the implementation of cost-effective,
common sense technology. Fundamental to ORD's mission
is a partnership with the academic scientific community
through extramural research grants and fellowships to help
develop the sound environmental research necessary to
ensure effective policy and regulatory decisions.  ORD also
implements such programs as the Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) program which focuses on
treatment technologies and EPA's Environmental Technology
Verification Program (ETV) which focuses on site
characterization technologies.  ORD can be accessed through
the Internet at .
                                                      C-4

-------
 Remediation Technologies Development Forum
 (RTDF).  RTDF was established by EPA to foster public-
 private partnerships that would conduct laboratory and
 applied research to develop, test, and evaluate innovative
 remediation technologies.  RTDF's home page provides
 access to information about various remediation
 technologies currently being designed, developed and
 evaluated through seven action teams of RTDF including:
 the Bioremcdiation of Chlorinated Solvents Consortium,
 the LASAGNA™ Partnership, the Permeable Reactive
 Barriers Action Team, the Sediments Remediation Action
 Team, the In-Place Inactivation and Natural Ecological
 Restoration Technologies (IINERT) Soil-Metals Action
 Team, the Phytoremediation of Organics Action Team, and
 the In Situ Flushing Action Team.  RTDF can be accessed
 through the Internet at .

 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
 Demonstration Program. The SITE Demonstration
 program was established by EPA's Office of Solid Waste
 and Emergency Response and the Office of Research and
 Development to encourage the development and
 implementation of innovative treatment technologies for
 the remediation of hazardous waste sites, and monitoring
 and measurement. Through the program, technologies are
 field-tested on hazardous waste materials and engineering
 and cost data are gathered on the innovative technology so
 that potential users can assess the technology's applicability
 to a particular site. Data collected during the field
 demonstrations are used to assess the performance of the
 technology, the potential need for pre- and post-processing
 of the waste, applicable types of wastes and waste
 matrices, potential operating problems, and approximate
 capital and operating costs.  The collected information is
 then provided in a Innovative Technology Evaluation
 Report, Technology Capsule, and Demonstration Bulletin.
 These reports evaluate all available information on the
 technology and analyze its overall applicability to other site
 characteristics, waste types, and waste matrices. Testing
 procedures, performance and cost data, and quality
 assurance and quality standards also are presented. The
 SITE Demonstration program can be accessed through the
 Internet at .

 Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (1TRC).
 ITRC is a state-led coalition working together with
 industry an stakeholders to achieve regulatory acceptance
 of environmental technologies.  ITRC consists fo more
 than 35 states, the District of Columbia, multiple federal
 partners, industry participants, and other stakeholders,
 cooperation to break down barriers and reduce compliance
costs, making it easier to use new technologies and helping
 states maximize resources.  Originating in 1995 from a
previous initiative by the Western Governors Association
(WGA). 1TRC brings together a diverse mix of
environmental experts and stakeholders from both the
public and private sectors to broaden and deepen technical
knowledge and streamline the regulation of new
 environmental technologies.  ITRC accomplishes its mission
 in two ways: it develops guidance documents and training
 courses to meet the needs of both regulators and
 environmental consultants, and it works with state
 representatives to ensure that ITRC products and services
 have maximum impact among state environmental agencies
 and technology users. ITRC technical work teams develop
 guidance documents and both classroom and Internet-based
 training courses to meet the information needs of regulatory
 staff, technology vendors, and environmental consultants.
 These products help state environmental agencies gain
 valuable technical knowledge and develop consistent
 regulatory approaches for reviewing and approving specific
 technologies.  State regulators lead ITRC technical teams,
 which rely on broad-based participation from federal
 agencies, industry, academia, and other stakeholders in
 building collective knowledge and collaborative products.
 ITRC can be accessed through the Internet at .

 Technology Innovation Program (TIP). The U.S.
 Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) TIP was created
 in 1990 to act as an advocate for new technologies.  TIP's
 mission is to increase the application of innovative treatment
 technologies to contaminated waste sites, soils, and
 groundwater.  To meet that mission, TIP has expanded its
 focus from treatment technologies to  include site
 characterization technologies in order to improve the
 remediation  process.  TIP has encouraged and relied on
 cooperative ventures with other partners to accomplish many
 of its goals.  This effort to effectively use resources has led to
 numerous joint efforts that have enhanced the state of both
 remediation  and site characterization. For additional
 information about TIP, contact Jeff Heimerman of EPA's TIP
 at (703) 603-719!. TIP can be accessed through the Internet
 at
 .

    SITE CHARACTERIZATION  TECHNOLOGIES

 Electronic Sources of Information

 EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory -
 Hazardous Waste Site Characterization (on CD-ROM)
 (EPA 600-C-96-001). The Hazardous Waste Site
 Characterization CD-ROM, developed by NERL's ESD-LV,
 compiles guidance documents and related software to aid
 environmental professionals in the complex,
 multidisciplinary, characterizing of hazardous waste sites.
 The CD-ROM is a compilation of computer programs related
to EPA's RCRA and Superfund programs that can be printed,
as well as searched by key words. Using the CD-ROM
requires a personal computer with DOS Version 3.0 or
higher, 640K of Ram, and 3 MB of hard disk space. A math
co-processor is recommended but not required.  The CD-
 ROM can be ordered on-line through the NTIS Internet site at
.
                                                      C-5

-------
Field Sampling and Analysis Technologies Matrix. The
Matrix, developed by participating agencies of the Federal
Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR), is a matrix
and reference guide that is intended to provide users with
an understanding of the site characterization technologies
available to them and the applicability of various
technologies to their particular problem(s). The Matrix
provides a general understanding of state-of-the-art
technologies for site characterization.  The Matrix and
reference guide also enhances technology information
transfer and provides much needed comparison among
competing technologies. The Matrix can be accessed
through the Internet at .

TechDirect. TechDirect, hosted by EPA's TIP, is an
information service that highlights new publications and
events of interest to environmental professionals.
Information about site characterization and remediation
technologies are available through this Internet
subscription service. Approximately once a month, the
service distributes by electronic mail a message describing
the availability of publications and announcements of
events. For publications, the message  explains how to
obtain a hard copy or how to download an electronic
version from the Internet.  For additional information about
TechDirect, contact Jeff Heimermann  at (703) 603-7191 or
by E-mail •sAheimerman.jeff@epamail.epa.gov.
TechDirect can be accessed through the Internet at
.

Programs, Partnerships, and Organizations

Consortium for Site Characterization and Technology
(CSCT). CSCT was established as one of 12 pilot projects
currently implemented by EPA's Environmental
Technology Verification (ETV) Program. The CSCT is a
partnership program among the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Defense
(DoD), and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) that  is
responsible for evaluating and verifying the performance of
innovative site characterization technologies. The CSCT
provides support to technology developers, evaluates and
verifies data generated during demonstrations, and
develops and disseminates information about the
performance of site characterization technologies.  CSCT
can be accessed through the Internet at .

Environmental Technology Verification Program. The
ETV program seeks to provide credible performance data
on environmental technologies from independent third
parties under the auspices of EPA. It verifies the
performance of innovative technical solutions to problems
that threaten human health or the environment.  Managed
by EPA's ORD, ETV was created to substantially
accelerate the entrance of new environmental technologies
into domestic and international marketplaces. It supplies
buyers of technologies, developers of those technologies,
consulting engineers, states, and EPA regions with high-
quality data on the performance of new technologies.  ETV
expands on past verification efforts, such as those conducted
under the SITE program for remediation technologies.  ETV
currently implements 10 pilot projects, including the
Consortium for Site Characterization Technology (CSCT).
The ETV program can be accessed through the Internet at
.

EPA Library Network Program. The EPA National
Library Network Program is a repository of information from
EPA's Headquarters, Regional and Field Offices, Research
Centers, and specialized laboratories throughout the country.
The Library Network provides access to its collection
through the On-line Library System (OLS), a menu-driven
database of the library's holdings. The OLS provides users
with the ability to perform online searches by author, title, or
keyword. The material on OLS is updated every two weeks.
The EPA National Library Network Program can be accessed
through the Internet at .

Office of Research and Development (ORD).  ORD,  under
the Assistant Administrator, Paul Oilman, Ph. D., is the
scientific and technological arm of EPA. Comprised of three
headquarters offices, three national research laboratories and
two national centers, ORD is organized around a basic
strategy of risk assessment and risk assessment management
to remediate environmental and human health problems.
ORD focuses on the advancement of basic peer-reviewed
scientific research and the implementation of cost-effective,
common sense technology.  Fundamental to ORD's mission
is a partnership with the academic scientific community
through extramural research grants and  fellowships to help
develop the sound environmental research necessary to
ensure effective policy and regulatory decisions. ORD also
implements such  programs as the Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) program which focuses  on
treatment technologies and EPA's Environmental Technology
Verification»Program (ETV) which focuses on site
characterization technologies. ORD can be accessed through
the Internet at .

Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Demonstratio'n Program.  The SITE Demonstration
program was established by EPA's Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response and the Office of Research and
Development to encourage the development and
implementation of innovative treatment technologies for the
remediation of hazardous waste sites, and monitoring and
measurement. Through the program, technologies are field-
tested on hazardous waste materials and engineering and cost
data are gathered on the innovative technology so that
potential users can assess the technology's applicability to a
particular site.  Data collected during the field demonstrations
are used to assess the performance of the technology, the
potential need for pre- and post-processing of the waste,
applicable types of wastes and waste matrices, potential
operating problems, and approximate capital and operating
                                                      C-6

-------
costs. The collected information is then provided in a
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report, Technology
Capsule, and Demonstration Bulletin. These reports
evaluate all available information on the technology and
analyze its overall applicability to other site characteristics,
waste types, and waste matrices. Testing procedures,
performance and cost data, and quality assurance and
quality standards also are presented. The SITE
Demonstration program can be accessed through the
Internet at .

Technology Innovation Program (TIP). The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) TIP was created
in 1990 to act as an advocate for new technologies. TIP's
mission is to increase the application of innovative
treatment technologies to contaminated waste sites, soils,
and groundwater. To Meet that mission, TIP has expanded
its focus from treatment technologies to include site
characterization technologies in order to improve the
remediation process. TIP has encouraged and relied on
cooperative ventures with other partners to accomplish
many of its goals. This effort to effectively use resources
has led to numerous joint efforts that have enhanced the
state of both remediation and site characterization.  For
additional information about TIP, contact Jeff Heimerman
of EPA's TIP at (703) 603-7191.  TIP can be accessed
through the Internet at
.
                                                      C-7

-------

-------
                Appendix D







GLOSSARY OF REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES
                   D-l

-------
       This Appendix presents definitions and brief discussions of the innovative remediation
technologies mentioned in the text of this Annual SITE Report.  Established/conventional
technologies (including pump and treat, stabilization, vitrification, incineration, and
excavation/disposal) are being replaced by these state-of-the-art, typically more cost-effective
technologies are also presented.
Innovative Remediation Technologies
       BIOREMEDIATION uses microorganisms to degrade organic contaminants in either
excavated or in situ soil, sludge, and solids. The microorganisms break down contaminants by
using them as a food source or cometabolizing them with a food source. Land farming, biopiles,
composting, and slurry-phase bioremediation are examples of ex situ applications.  Bioventing is
a common form of in situ bioremediation which uses extraction wells to circulate air through the
ground, sometimes also  pumping air into the ground.
       CHEMICAL TREATMENT, also known as chemical reduction/oxidation, typically
converts hazardous contaminants to nonhazardous or less toxic compounds that are more stable,
less mobile, or inert.  The oxidizing agents most commonly used for treatment of hazardous
contaminants in soil are ozone, hydrogen peroxide, hypochlorites, chlorine, chlorine dioxide,
potassium permanganate, and Fentons reagent (hydrogen peroxide and iron).  Cyanide oxidation
and dechlorination are examples of chemical treatment.  This method may be applied in situ or
ex situ, to soils, sludges, sediments, and other  solids, and may also be applied for the in situ
treatment of groundwater.
       IN SITU SOIL FLUSHING: large volumes of water, at times supplemented with
surfactants, cosolvents, or treatment compounds, are applied to the soil or injected into the
groundwater to raise the water table into the contaminated soil zone. Injected water and
treatment agents are isolated within the underlying aquifer and recovered together with flushed
contaminants.
       PHYTOREMEDIATION is a process that uses plants (roots, shoots, tissues, and leaves)
to remove, transfer, stabilize, or destroy contaminants in soil, sediment, and groundwater.
Phytoremediation applies to all biological, chemical, and physical processes that are influenced
by plants and that aid in cleanup of the contaminated substances. Plants can be used in site
remediation, both through the mineralization of toxic organic compounds and through the
                                          D-2

-------
accumulation and concentration of heavy metals and other inorganic compounds from soil into
aboveground shoots. Phytoremediation may be applied in situ or ex situ, to soils, sludges,
sediments, other solids, or groundwater.
       DUAL-PHASE EXTRACTION, also known as multi-phase extraction, uses a vacuum
system to remove various combinations of contaminated groundwater, separate-phase petroleum
product, and vapors from the subsurface.  The system lowers the water table around the well,
exposing more of the formation. Contaminants in the newly exposed unsaturated zone are then
accessible to soil vapor extraction. Once above ground, the extracted vapors or liquid-phase
organics and ground water are separated and treated.
       SOLIDIFICATION/STABILIZATION (S/S) reduces the mobility of hazardous
substances and contaminants in the environment through both physical and chemical means.
The S/S process  physically binds or encloses contaminants within a stabilized mass. S/S is
performed both ex situ and in situ. Ex situ S/S requires excavation of the material to be treated,
and the resultant material must be disposed. In situ S/S uses auger/caisson systems and injector
head systems to add binders to the contaminated soil or waste without excavation, and the
resultant material is left in place.
       SOLVENT EXTRACTION uses an organic solvent as an extractant to separate organic
and metal contaminants from soil. The organic solvent is mixed with contaminated soil in an
extraction unit. The extracted solution is then passed through a separator, where the
contaminants and extractant are separated from the soil.  Organically bound metals may be
extracted along with the target organic contaminants.
       IN SITU  THERMAL DESORPTION: wastes are heated so that organic contaminants
and water volatilize. Typically, a carrier gas or vacuum system transports the volatilized water
and organics to a gas treatment system.
       THERMALLY ENHANCED RECOVERY uses heat to increase the volatilization rate of
organics and facilitate extraction.  Volatilized contaminants are typically removed from the
vadose zone using soil vapor extraction. Specific types of these thermally enhanced recovery
techniques include Contained Recovery of Oily Waste (CROW™), radio frequency heating,
conductive heating, steam heating, in situ steam stripping, hot air injection, dynamic
underground stripping, in situ thermal desorption, and electrical resistance heating. Thermally
enhanced recovery is usually applied to contaminated soil, but may also be applied to
                                          D-3

-------
 groundwater.
       VITRIFICATION uses an electric current to melt contaminated soil at elevated
temperatures (1,600 to 2,000°C or 2,900 to 3,650°F). Upon cooling, the vitrification product is a
chemically stable, leach-resistant, glass and crystalline material similar to obsidian or basalt
rock.  The high temperature component of the process destroys or removes organic materials.
Radionuclides and heavy metals are retained within the vitrified product.  Vitrification may be
conducted in situ or ex situ.
       TREATMENT BARRIERS, also known as permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) or passive
treatment walls, are installed across the flow path of a contaminated groundwater plume,
allowing the water portion of the plume to flow through the wall.  These barriers allow the
passage of water while prohibiting the movement of contaminants by employing agents within
the wall such as zero-valent metals, chelators, sorbents, and microbes. The contaminants are
either degraded or retained in a concentrated form by the barrier material, which may need to be
replaced periodically.

Conventional Remediation Technologies
       AIR SPARGING involves the injection of air or oxygen through a contaminated aquifer.
Injected air traverses horizontally and vertically in channels through the soil column, creating an
underground stripper that removes volatile and semivolatile organic contaminants by
volatilization. Soil Vapor Extraction is usually  implemented in conjunction with air sparging to
remove the generated vapor-phase contamination from the unsaturated zone.  Oxygen added to
the contaminated groundwater and vadose-zone soils also can enhance biodegradation of
contaminants below and above the water table.
       EX SITU THERMAL DESORPTION: wastes are heated so that organic contaminants
and water volatilize. Typically, a carrier gas or vacuum system transports the volatilized water
and organics to a gas treatment system.
       SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION (SVE) is used to remediate the zone of soil which is
unsaturated with contaminated groundwater. A vacuum is applied to the soil to control the flow
of air and remove volatile and  some semivolatile organic contaminants from the soil.
       For SOIL WASHING,  contaminants are absorbed onto fine soil particle surfaces are
separated from bulk soil in a water-based system on the basis of particle size. The wash water
may be augmented with a basic leaching agent, surfactant, or chelating agent or by adjustment of
                                          D-4

-------
pH to help remove organics and heavy metals. Soils and wash water are mixed ex situ in a tank
or other treatment unit.  The wash water and various soil fractions are usually separated using
gravity settling.
       VERTICAL ENGINEERED BARRIERS (VEBs) are subsurface barriers made of an
impermeable material designed to contain or divert groundwater.  VEBs can be used to contain
contaminated groundwater, divert uncontaminated groundwater from a contaminated area, or
divert contaminated groundwater from a drinking water intake or other protected resource.
       INCINERATION involves the ex situ destruction of contaminated soil, sludge, and
sediment in high temperature (1,800 - 2,200°F) combustion devices.  A typical hazardous waste
incinerator, diagrammed below, consists of a rotary kiln (primary combustion chamber), an
afterburner (secondary combustion chamber), connected to an air pollution control system, all of
which are controlled and monitored.
       PUMP-AND-TREAT involves removal of contaminated groundwater is from the
subsurface treatment, and discharge or reinjection, is one of the most widely used ground-water
remediation technologies. The pump and treat remediation approach is used at about three-
quarters of the Superfund sites where ground water is contaminated and at most sites where
cleanup is required by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and state laws. It is often
associated with treatment technologies such as Air Stripping and Liquid -phase Granular
Activated Charcoal.  Although the effectiveness of pump and treat systems has been called into
question after two decades of use, this approach remains a necessary component of most ground-
water remediation efforts and can be appropriate for both restoration and plume containment.
                                         D-5

-------

-------

-------
&EPA
      United States
      Environmental Protection
      Agency


      Office of Research and Development
      National Risk Management
        Research Laboratory
      Cincinnati, OH 45268

      Official Business
      Penalty for Private Use
      $300

      EPA/540/R-04/505
      August 2004
      www.epa.gov
PRESORTED STANDARD
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
       EPA
   PERMIT No. G-35
                                        Recycled/Recyclable
                                        Printed with vegetable-based ink on
                                        paper that contains a minimum of
                                        50% post-consumer fiber content
                                        processed chlorine free

-------