United States
                        Environmental Protection
                        Agency
                       Office of Wate
                       (WH-585)
                                                                   823N92001
          Number 5
          April 1992
v°/EPA    Contaminated
                        Sediments News
        Sediment Strategy Forums Scheduled

EPA's Office of Water, Risk Assessment and Management Branch, is sponsor-
ing three forums this spring/summer focusing on issues important to the Agency
in developing a strategy for contaminated sediments.  Each forum will include
panel presentations by invited experts and discussion periods, as well as
periods of time set aside for comments from the audience. Speakers will
include representatives from EPA EMAP, NOAA NS&T, USGS, ACOE, MA
Division of Food and Drugs, and others. A document summarizing the three
forums will be produced and available in July 1992. The topics for these forums
are as follows:

•  Forum #1 - Extent and Severity of Sediment Contamination
   Chicago, IL, April 21-22,1992

•  Forum #2 - Contaminated Sediments: Building Alliances Among Federal
   Agencies, Washington, DC, May 27-28, 1992

•  Forum #3 - Contaminated Sediments: Outreach and Public Awareness
   Washington, DC, June 16,1992

For more information contact Tim Kastin, EPA-OST, at (202)260-5994.
   Sediment Activities
   Around the Country

 EPA Headquarters	

 Tiered Testing Workgroup
 Developing Standard Methods

 On March 5, 1992, a detailed outline
 of EPA's sediment management
 strategy was distributed for public
 review and comment. Under the
 strategy, EPA will develop and use a
 consistent, minimum set of chemical
   CS Afews is produced by EPA-OST to
   exchange retevant information on con-
   taminated sedimants and to increase
   communication among interested par-
   ttes. To abtda copies rto
   eontrtoute information, contact Beveriy
   Baker, EPA HO, at (202)260-7037,
and biological methods across Agency
programs to determine whether sedi-
ments are contaminated. These
methods will be incorporated into
various programs for the prevention,
remediation, and management of
dredged material disposal. Once a
standard set of tests is established,
the"y may be supplemented with EPA
program-specific assessment meth-
ods. Individual programs may also
develop their own guidance detailing
the regulatory actions to be taken
based on the assessment methods
used.

An Agency wide "tiered testing
workgroup" is currently working to
identify the suite of tests that can be
used by all EPA programs to consis-
tently assess environmental problems
caused by contaminated sediment.
The workgroup met on March 31 to
complete a review of EPA regulatory
continued on p. 2
                                 Contaminated Sediment
                                   Activities Timeline
April 21-22,1992. EPA Sediment
Strategy Forum #1 - Extent and Severity
of Sediment Contamination. Chicago,
L. Contact Deborah Kanter at (617)
641-5317.

April 28-30,1992. 2d ASTM Sympo-
sium on Environmental Toxicology and
Risk Assessment. Pittsburgh, PA.
 lontact Chris Ingersoll at (314)875-
5399.

May 14-15,1992. National Conference
on Bioavailability of Dioxin, PCBs, and
Metals in Aquatic Ecosystems. Wash-
ington, DC. Contact Nora Claudias at
(301)596-3855.

May 24-30,1992. Water Quality Inter-
national '92: 16th Biennial Conference
and Exposition. Washington, DC.

May 27-28,1992. EPA Sediment
Strategy Forum #2 - Contaminated
Sediments: Building Alliances Among
Federal Agencies. Washington, DC.
Contact Deborah Kanter at (617)641-
5317.

June 16,1992. EPA Sediment Strategy
Forum #3 - Contaminated Sediments:
Outreach and Public Awareness.
Washington, DC. Contact Deborah
Kanter at (617)641-5317.

June 21-24,1992. Subsurface Restora
tion Conference. Dallas, TX. Contact
Kathy Balshaw-Biddle at (713)527-4951

September 1-3,1992. 3rd National
 Meeting: Water Quality Standards for
the 21st Century. Las Vegas, NV.
 Contact Patti Morris at (202)260-2806.
           Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
 program sediment testing needs and
 requirements and the testing guidance
 that is now available. The workgroup
 also consulted with EPA's Office of
 Research and Development to design
 a program of research that will gener-
 ate a set of standard sediment testing
 protocols.  The research program,
 funded by the Office of Water, will be
 undertaken by EPA's Environmental
 Research Laboratories in Duluth, MN,
 and Narragansett, Rl. Initial research
 will focus on  the completion of acute
 sediment toxicity test protocols for
 appropriately sensitive marine and
 freshwater species, as well as bioac-
 cumulation test protocols.  Work is
 also planned to develop chronic
 sediment testing protocols. Quality
 assurance requirements and guide-
 lines will be developed by the
 workgroup jointly with EPA's Environ-
 mental Research Laboratories and
 Environmental Monitoring and Sys-
 tems Laboratories.

 In addition to completing work on the
 test protocols, the workgroup is
 planning a national workshop on
 sediment toxicity testing. The work-
 shop will bring scientists and regula-
 tors together  to discuss a tiered
 sediment testing framework.  For more
 information contact Tom Armrtage,
 EPA-OST, at (202)260-5388.

 Fish Consumption Advisory
 Special Interest Group Added
 to BBS

 The Risk Assessment and  Manage-
 ment Branch  has established a Fish
 Consumption Advisory Special Interest
 Group (SIG) on the Nonpoint Source
 Bulletin Board System (BBS). The
 SIG functions as a discrete, fully
 functioning  BBS. The purpose of the
 Fish Advisory SIG is to promote the
 exchange of fish advisory information
 among Federal agencies, State health
 departments,  State fish and game
 services, State water pollution control
 agencies and  the public.

 The Fish Consumption SIG offers
 several features. The primary feature
 is a database  that contains a bibliogra-
 phy of fish advisory-related reports, a
table of existing fish advisories/bans
 for each State, and the names and
 phone numbers of contacts who can
 provide additional information. The
 table of existing fish advisories con-
 tains the following information: the
 chemical of concern, the nature of the
 advisory (for the
 general public, a
 subpopulation, or
 commercial), the
 name of the water
 body,  and the
 geographical extent.
 The database of fish
 advisories and bans
 can be searched for
 specific information.
 One possible way to
 search the database
 is to request the
 number, location
 and type of fish
 advisories in a par-
 ticular state.  A second possibility
 includes the number and location of all
 the fish advisories that have been
 issued in the United States for a
 specific contaminant such as chlor-
 dane.  The bibliography can also be
 searched by title, author, and/or key
 words.

 A second feature includes the posting
 of bulletins/news articles.  This feature
 allows users to share fish advisory-
 related information and publicize fish
 advisory-related activities undertaken
 by the  Federal government and the
 States. Other features enable  users to
 leave messages requesting informa-
 tion from other users, to conduct
 discussions directly with colleagues,
 and to  exchange computer files,
 including databases, electronic
 spreadsheets, word-processing files,
 and software.

 The phone number of the BBS  is
 (301 )589-0205. To access the NPS
 BBS, you will need a personal com-
 puter, telecommunications software
 (such as Crosstalk or ProComm), a
 modem (1200 or 2400 baud) and a
 phone  line that will handle modem
 communications. First-time users will
 be asked to fill out a short registration
form and create a password. The Fish
Consumption SIG can be accessed by
typing J 2 at the main board command
prompt. EPA invites everyone to take
a look at the database and welcomes
 any suggestions on how to improve its
 use.

 The draft of EPA's Contaminated
 Sediment Management Strategy is
 now available in the Fish Consumption
                    SIG. The Office
                    of Water is
                    soliciting input on
                    the draft proposal
                    which has been
                    distributed to
                    over 900 people.
                    The schedule
                    and information
                    on the three
                    public forums are
                   also included in
                   the file.

                   A copy of the
                   User's Manual
                   can be down-
 loaded if you are familiar with the
 operation of the NPS BBS, or it can be
 mailed to you.  If you would like a copy
 or have any information to contribute
 to the  Fish Advisory SIG, contact
 Alison Greene at (202)260-7052.

 EPA Science Advisory Board
 Reviews Green Book

 The EPA Science Advisory Board
 (SAB)  provided a number of recom-
 mendations for improving the Green
 Book (see Contaminated Sediments
 News, Issue No. 4, p. 1) in its January
 1992 report, EPA-SAB-EPEC-92-014,
 Review of a  Testing Manual for
 Evaluation of Dredged Material
 Proposed for Ocean Disposal. As-
 pects of the manual addressed by the
 SAB include quality assurance/quality
 control, use of sediment quality
 criteria, selection of appropriately
 sensitive organisms for toxicity tests,
 use of  application factors, interpreta-
 tion of  bioaccumulation test results,
 reference site selection, and interpre-
 tative guidance for decision-making.
 Many of the SAB recommendations
 will be  incorporated into future revi-
 sions of the Green Book and into the
 Inland Testing Manual (under develop-
 ment) for evaluation of dredged mate-
 rial proposed for discharge in inland
 and near coastal waters (Clean Water
Act waters).  For more information
contact Mike Kravitz, EPA-OST, at
 (202)260-8085.

-------
Office of Radiation Programs

On October 8,1991, ORP conducted
a sediment workshop for Dr. Viktor N.
Egorov, Deputy Director, Institute of
Biology of the Southern Seas, in
Washington, DC. Members of the
EPA Sediment Oversight Technical
Committee presented papers showing
current U.S. status  in sediment
cleanup endeavors. Chris Zarba
discussed "National Sediment Criter-
ia," Mike Kravitz presented "Sediment
Quality Assessment Methods," and
Janet Burris discussed "Ecological
Risk Assessment and Remedial De-
sign at Superfund Sites." Jim Nei-
heisel and Bill Curtis discussed the
results of the EPA study of the Black
Sea investigation conducted in June
1990 for evidence of Chernobyl fallout
in the Black Sea sediment  and water
column, as well as current  studies of
radioactivity in sediment of the Kieve
Reservoir.

 ORP has also developed a soil
characterization protocol for radioac-
tively contaminated soils at Superfund
 sites that is also applicable for charac-
 terization of radioactive sediments and
 remedial considerations. The protocol
 was developed by ORP from hands-on
 studies at radium-contaminated sites
 at Montclair and Glen Ridge, New
 Jersey, and from thorium-contami-
 nated sites at Wayne and  May wood,
 New Jersey. The  protocol is in press
 as an OSWER Technical Bulletin.
 ORD ACTIVITIES
  ERL-Newport

  Sediment contaminants may pose a
  human health risk if they are bioaccu-
  mulated by clams and other edible
  sediment-dwelling organisms. A key
  question is whether ecologically-
  derived sediment quality criteria are
  sufficiently stringent to protect human
  health so that health risks do not have
  to be explicitly considered.  Henry Lee
  (EPA), Martha Winsor (AScI), and
  Robert Randall (EPA) of the ERL-N
  Newport laboratory are addressing this
  question by modeling the tissue
  residues in shellfish at sediment
quality "guideline" values and then
predicting the associated health
effects.

Cancer risk is estimated by EPA's
linearized multistage cancer model,
whereas noncarcinoginic effects are
predicted from the hazard quotient.
The health risks associated with 12
carcinogens and 8 noncarcinogenic
metals are calculated for shellfish
consumption rates ranging from one
meal  per day to one meal per lifetime.
Bioaccumulation of neutral organics is
predicted from the equilibrium parti-
tioning bioaccumulation model and
metals from bioaccumulation factors
(BAFs). The five ecologically-derived
sediment "guidelines" are  as follows:

•  the interim equilibrium partitioning
   (EqP) values,
•  the median and sensitive apparent
   effect thresholds (AET) from Region
   10, and
 •  the median and low effects range
   (ER-M and ER-L) developed by
   NOAA.

 With the exception of the  EqP values,
 the sediment guidelines are not
 sediment quality "criteria" per se, but
 they should bracket the range of any
 ecologically-derived criteria.

 For the carcinogens, the lifetime
 excess cancer risks of  1O'6 and 10"4
 were used as cut-offs for unacceptable
 risks. At one meal per day, the 10-6
 risk was exceeded for at least one of
 the ecologically-derived guidelines for
 all 12 compounds, with the EqP values
 exceeding the  106 risk for 8 to 12 of
 the carcinogens. The number of
 sediment guidelines resulting in risks
 exceeding 10'6 declined with reduced
 consumption rates, but at one meal
 per year one or more of the sediment
 guidelines resulted in risks exceeding
  10'6 with 7 of the 12 compounds.
  Even at the lowest possible consump-
 tion rate, one meal in a lifetime, the
  106 risk was exceeded by the AET-M
  and EqP values for benzo (a) pyrene
  and by the AET-M for PCBs. The
  analysis using 10"4 risk showed a
  similar pattern although none of the
  compounds exceeded 10"* risk with
  one meal per lifetime.
For the noncarcinogens, only four
sediment guidelines are used as EqP
does not apply to metals. At a con-
sumption rate of one meal per day,
seven of the eight metals have hazard
quotients exceeding 1.0 for one or
more of the sediment guidelines.  The
hazard quotient is a threshold value,
with a value greater than 1.0 indicating
that sensitive individuals would be
adversely affected. At one meal per
month, only cadmium has a hazard
quotient exceeding 1.0 for one of the
sediment guidelines, and there are no
violations with one  meal per year or
lifetime.

The main conclusion to draw from this
analysis is that ecologically-derived
sediment quality criteria do not protect
human health for a variety of carcino-
ginic and noncarcinogenic pollutants.
Therefore, human  health risks should
be considered in the development of
sediment quality criteria and the
 management of contaminated sedi-
 ment. For more information contact
 Henry Lee, ERL-Newport, at (503)867-
 4042.
 GREAT IAKES NATIONAL
 PROGRAM OFRCE	


 The ARCS program has initiated
 several pilot-scale demonstration
 projects to employ innovative tech-
 nologies in the treatment of contami-
 nated sediments.  Three additional
 projects will be completed this sum-
 mer. All of the pilot projects are being
 managed by the local Corps of Engi-
 neers office.

 Buffalo River, Buffalo, NY
 The Buffalo River demonstration was
 completed in November 1991 at a
 confined disposal facility (CDF)
  managed by the U.S. Army Corps of
  Engineers. Twelve cubic yards (yd3)
  of contaminated sediments from the
  Buffalo River were processed in a low-
  temperature thermal desorption unit
  provided by Remediation Technolo-
  gies, Inc. This unit volatilizes the
  organics of concern (PAHs, oil and
  grease)  and recondenses them in an
  oil mixture. The remaining solid
  continued on p. 6

-------
                                            Focus:
                                           New  England
                                    polluted that the use of divers to
                                    collect intact sediment cores for
                                    subsequent research studies could
                                    represent a serious health threat to the
                                    investigators. This corer eliminates
                                    such risks to human health.  For more
                                    information contact Kenneth Perez,
                                    ERL-Narragansett, at (401)782-3052.
                                    Summary of Recent
                                    Capping Investigations
                                    with Dredged Sediments
                                    in New England
  ERL-Narragansett
  Develops "Soft Bottom"
  Sediment Corer

  After a long series of tests and modifi-
  cations, a sediment corer developed at
  ERL-Narragansett has been shown to
  be capable of collecting intact and
  undisturbed sediment cores from "soft
  bottom" locales in Narragansett Bay,
  Rl.  Present cores are 6 inches in
  diameter and up to 24 inches in
  length. The collection method uses a
  water vacuum, created at the sedi-
  ment-water interface, that is capable
 of removing the core from the sedi-
 ment bottom.  The core is then trans-
 ferred to the water surface and subse-
 quently placed on the deck of the ship,
 where a removable nose cone con-
 taining the core is put into a life sup-
 port system for transport to laboratory
 microcosms. Future efforts will be
 directed toward increasing the diame-
 ter of the sediment core from 6 inches
 to 12 inches. In addition, the degree
 of "soft bottom" hardness will be
 quantified (via grain-size analysis)
 throughout the Bay so that the range
 of sediments in which the corer can
 function successfully will be rigorously
 defined for future users.

 This corer is valuable because many
aquatic environments are so highly
  Casco Bay Critical
  Habitat Pilot Study

  The Casco Bay National Estuary
  Program has developed a menu-
  driven GIS application to support the
  National Estuary Program's need for
  multimedia information for watershed
  characterization and protection of
  shellfish resources in Casco Bay.
  Data were digitized and integrated for
 shoreline areas, shellfish beds,
 biological areas, critical resource
 areas, hydrography and drainage
 areas, and NPDES locations.  Future
 efforts will include the addition  of soils,
 contours, land use/land cover,
 landfills, and an agricultural inventory
 to assess impacts of nonpoint source
 pollution on critical habitats and shell-
 fish. In addition to creating the GIS
 layers, an interface for EPA's PCS
 data base will be created to allow easy
 downloading of monitoring data for
 input into the GIS application. Once
 the system is fully implemented, users
 will be able to evaluate potential
 causes of degradation, assess the po-
tential impact of point and nonpoint
source pollution, and target high-risk
dischargers for further controls.  For
more information contact Ray Hall,
EPA-OCPD, at (202)260-1998.
  Capping of contaminated dredged
  sediments in mounds at shallow (20-
  60 m) offshore disposal sites with less
  contaminated sediments has been
  used as a management practice in
  New England since the early 1970s.
  Evaluation of the success of this
  technique and extension of its use to
  deep-water sites (60-100 m) has been
  the focus of a number of studies over
  the last several years.  These studies
  have included assessment of physical
  mound stability, the long-term isolation
  of contaminants within the mounds,
  and surveys to determine the feasibil-
  ity of creating sediment mounds at
  sites in the 100-m depth range.  The
  passage of Hurricane Gloria in 1985
  was found to have limited erosion
  effects on capped disposal mounds at
 the central Long Island Sound dis-
 posal site at the 15 to 20-m depth.
 This observation has also  been
 supported by observations of mound
 stability at several sites for up to15
 years. Chemical profiles measured in
 cores taken in mounds in 1990, more
 than 10 years after contaminated
 sediment and cap sediment place-
 ment, showed no detectable contami-
 nant migration. More recently, studies
 of mound formation with disposed
 sediments at the Massachusetts Bay
 disposal site, at a 90-m depth, have
 begun to support the feasibility of
 capping sediments at this and other
 sites with similar depths. For more
 information contact Tom Fredette, US-
ACE, at (617)647-8291.

-------
       Sediment Database  Compiled
The U.S. Geological Survey Office of
Energy and Marine Geology has main-
tained a scientific East Coast (off-
shore) sediment database since the
1970s. In an effort to extend coverage
to inshore coastal areas and compile a
contaminated sediment database that
would attempt to include as compre-
hensive as possible an inventory of
chemical, geological/physical, and en-
vironmental parameters from all
sources (published and  unpublished),
USGS initiated a pilot program using
Boston Harbor-Massachusetts Bay.

In the past, many scientists have
regarded working with heterogeneous
older data as difficult and have often
simply launched new field studies.
Working with the Massachusetts
Water Resources Authority (MWRA)
and  EPA Region I, USGS sifted
through quantities of older data and
documents to demonstrate that special
approaches permit large-scale pro-
cessing (computer entry, validation,
and  integration) of data from hetero-
geneous sources. For example, re-
covery of data from some 1300
samples from the area to date re-
vealed a more detailed breakdown of
sediments in terms of their toxicity
potential for  mercury and 7 other
metals, when the effects-based
sediment toxicity criteria of Long and
Morgan (1990) were applied. Different
toxicity criteria will after toxicrty ratings,
but the new data input transforms the
scope of knowledge of environmental
parameters used to make manage-
ment decisions.

Besides continuing data compilation
and disseminating the data to users,
current and future efforts focus on
linking pollutant  distribution with
bottom sediment maps and creating
maps of pollutant concentrations at
different time intervals. These may
help to evaluate and predict changes
caused by major events such as
storms or dredging. For more informa-
tion contact Frank Manheim, USGS, at
(508)457-2235.
                           Mercury in Sediments
     100
      80
      60
      40
      20 !-
        No. of Samples
                    Hg (ppm)
                  0     0.5     10
            Below
          acute toxicity—^.
            levels  [f~~
      0.001     0.01      0.1       1        10       100
                 CONCENTRATION OF MERCURY (ppm)
                                                                         ENVIRONMENT CANADA
The Environmental Quality GukJe-
 ines Division of Environment
 lanada has the responsibility for
developing national sediment quality
guidelines.  These guidelines are
defined as numerical concentrations
or narrative statements recom-
mended to support and enhance
designated uses of the aquatic
environment.  These activities are
carried out under the auspices of the
Canadian Council of Ministers of the
 Environment (CCME), and all
guidelines are reviewed and ap-
 proved by the provincial and territo-
 rial members.

 Currently, the protocol for the deriva-
 tion and use of sediment quality
 guidelines (for the protection of
 freshwater and marine aquatic life
 and their uses) is being finalized.
 Once the protocol is approved by
 the CCME, guidelines wil be devel-
 oped for priority substances identi-
 fied by such clients as provincial and
 territorial agencies, the National
 Contaminated Sites Remediation
 Program, and the Canadian Environ-
 mental Protection Act (which in-
 cludes ocean dumping activities).

 Sediment quality guidelines are
 intended to provide scientifically-
 based "yardsticks" or reference
 points for addressing sediment
 quality issues and concerns.  These
 guidelines will contribute to the
 consistent development of site-
 specific objectives" which account
 for local environmental  conditions,
 as well as socio-economic factors),
 remediation objectives, and the
 regulatory requirements of various
 Canadian programs.

 For more information on the devel-
 opment of sediment quality guide-
 lines in Canada, contact Sherri
 Smith at (819)953-3082 or Amanda
 Brady at (819)953-3206.

-------
 material was either combined with
 Portland cement to determine the
 effectiveness of restricting the leach-
 ing of heavy metals or disposed of at
 an appropriate facility.

 Saginaw River and Bay, Ml
 Using particle size separation tech-
 nologies, Bergmann,  USA initiated a
 demonstration project in Saginaw Bay,
 Ml, in the fall of 1991. The project will
 be completed this summer.  This dem-
 onstration project combines soil wash-
 ing and particle separation technolo-
 gies to treat PCB-contaminated sedi-
 ment.  Using a barge-mounted  unit
 located at a COE-operated CDF in
 Saginaw Bay, a total of 300 to 400 yd3
 of sediment will be processed through
 the apparatus to separate the sands
 from the silts and clays.  In a full-scale
 project, PCBs will bind to the smaller
 grained silts and clays so that the
 sand mixture, which is roughly 80 per-
 cent of the total volume, will hopefully
 be clean enough to be used for some
 beneficial purpose (beach nourish-
 ment or construction fill). The remain-
 ing 20 percent will be disposed of in a
 CDF or destroyed using other treat-
 ment technologies. A portion of the
 contaminated silt will be sent to the
 Risk Reduction Engineering Labora-
 tory in Cincinnati, OH, to be treated
 using biodegradation techniques.

 Grand Calumet River, IN
 This demonstration project will take
 place in May 1992 at the U.S. Steel
 Gary plant, adjacent to the Grand
 Calumet River, IN.  The Basic Extrac-
 tion Sludge Technology (BEST), a
 solvent extraction process, will be
 used to extract PCBs, PAHs, and  oil
 and grease from 140 gallons of
 contaminated sediment. The solvent,
triethylamine, was developed by the
 Resource Conservation Company.

 Ashtabula, OH
A low thermal desorption technology
 will be used this summer to treat 15 to
20 yd3 of sediment contaminated with
 PCBs and other chlorinated hydrocar-
bons from the Astabula River in Ash-
tabula, OH.

 Sheboygan, Wl
 Bioremediation technologies will be
 used to treat 3300 yd3 of contaminated
sediments from the Tecumseh Motors
 Superfund site. These sediments are
 currently stored in a confined treat-
 ment facility on Tecumseh property.
 Sediments will be cycled from oxic to
 anoxic conditions, and/or nutrients will
 be added to achieve complete PCB
 degradation.  The firm Blasland and
 Bouck will be working with ERL-
 Athens to complete this demonstration
 project.

 For more information on these demon-
 stration projects, contact Steve
 Garbaciak, GLNPO, at (312)353-0117.


 NOAA
As part of the assessments of the
biological effects of toxicants in the
marine environment, NOAA's National
Status and Trends Program has
conducted a series of surveys of
sediment toxicrty in selected regions.
The first of these surveys was con-
ducted in the San Francisco Bay
estuary.  The survey was intended to
determine the spatial extent, spatial
pattern, and
severity of toxicity
throughout the
estuary.  Toxicity
data both from
historical surveys
and from the
testing of sedi-
ments from 45
sites were evalu-
ated.
              Crassostrea gigas) normal morpho-
              logical development tests during the
              period of 1985-1990. Based upon the
              cumulative record from these surveys,
              most of the estuary has been tested
              for toxicity with one or both of these
              tests. Out of a total of 111 samples
              tested with R. abronius, 56 (50.4
              percent) were significantly toxic. Of
              202 samples tested with bivalve
              larvae, 116 (57.4 percent) were signifi-
              cantly toxic. In some areas tested in
              the historical surveys, toxicity was very
              patchy and inconsistent among tests
              and surveys; in other areas, toxicity
              was relatively consistent. Highest
              toxicity was observed mainly in
              peripheral harbors such as Mare
              Island Strait near Vallejo, Richmond
              Harbor, Oakland Harbor, along the
              San Francisco waterfront, Redwood
              Creek, and Guadalupe Slough at the
              extreme southern  end of the  estuary.
              The Alcatraz dredged material dis-
              posal site was relatively toxic, and
              some of the sediments from the basins
              of San Pablo Bay, Central Bay, and
              South Bay were very toxic. Toxicity
              continued on p. 7
Numerous sites
have been
sampled for sedi-
ment toxicity in
historical surveys
performed by
several laborato-
ries and spon-
sored by numer-
ous agencies.
Sediments from
these sites were
tested for toxicity
with amphipod
(Rhepoxynius
abronius) survival
tests and/or
bivalve larvae
(Mytilus edulis or
        San Pablo Bay

               *
                           Non-toxic sites

                           Toxic sites
                           Palo Alto   ^Vr~'"C;=\  £
Locations of 45 sampling sites including 9 that were
             toxic to bivalve larvae

-------
was relatively highly correlated with
the concentrations of aromatic hydro-
carbons and, to a lesser extent,
certain trace metals and pesticides.

In 1990 NOAA sponsored a synoptic
survey of sediment toxicrty, performed
by ToxScan, Inc. Surficial sediments
were collected at 45 sites within the
estuary, mainly in the Central and
South Bay basins and adjacent
peripheral areas. Toxicity was deter-
mined with a battery of tests, one of
which was the bivalve larvae (M.
edulis) test of survival and normal
development.  Sediments from 9 of the
45 (20 percent) sampling sites were
significantly toxic to either survival or
normal development of the bivalve
larvae.  The toxic sites were located in
San Pablo Bay, South Bay, and
Oakland Harbor/San  Leandro Bay.
Tests of cytogenetic/cytologic end-
points in both mussel larvae and sea
urchin larvae indicated significant
effects in most or all of the 15 samples
tested.

The results of both the historical
 surveys performed in 1985-1990 and
the survey performed for NOAA in
 1990 indicated that toxic conditions
 are widespread throughout the estu-
 ary. Toxicity was more frequent and
 often most severe in peripheral
 harbors and waterways, but as
 expected, some basin areas also were
 toxic in some tests. The results of this
 work in San Francisco Bay are ex-
 pected to be published as a NOAA
 technical memorandum this spring.
 For more information contact Ed Long,
 NOAA, at (206)526-6338.
                       Relevant Literature

Curtis, W.R., and J. Broadway. In press.  Preliminary cesium data from a
cooperative US/USSR monitoring survey for Chernobyl radioactivity in the
Black Sea.  Journal of Chemistry and Ecology.    ^K '-«»•!•""

Diamond, J.M., E.L. Winchester, D.G. Mackler, and D. Gruber. 1992. Use
of the mayfly Stenonema modestum (Heptageniida) in subacute toxicrty
assessments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 11:415-425.

Durant, J.L, H.F. Hemond,  and W.G. Thilly. 1992. Determination of mut-
agenicity in sediments of the Aberjona watershed using human lymphoblast
and Salmonella typhimurium mutation assays.  Environmental Science and
Technology 26:599-608.

Fredette, T.J., J.D. Germano, D.A. Carey,  J. Charles, and P.G. Kullberg. In
press. Physical and chemical stability of capped dredged material disposal
mounds in Long Island Sound, USA. JC&E.

Fredette, T.J. In press. A summary of recent capping  investigations with
dredged sediments in New England, USA.  Proceedings of the 15th United
States/Japan experts meeting on Management ol Bottom Sediments Con-
taining Toxic Substances.

Fuhrmann, M,, R. Peitrzak, J. Neiheisel, and R. Dyer.  In press. Partitioning
of Cs 137 between sediment and water from the Black Sea.  JC&E.

Goodman,  L.R., M.L. Hemmer, D.P. Middaugh, and J.C. Moore. 1992.
 Effects of fenvalerate on the early life stages of Topsmert (Atherinops
affinis). ET&C 11:409-;415.

 Kwan, K.K., and B.J. Dutka. 1992. A novel bioassay approach: Direct ap-
 plication of the toxi-chromotest and the SOS chromotest to sediments.
 Environmental  Toxicology and Water Quality 7:49-60.

 Luoma, S.N., C. Johns,  N.S. Fisher,  N.A. Steinberg, R.S. Oremland, and
 J.R.  Reinfelder. 1992. Determination of selenium bioavailability to a benthic
 bivalve from particulate and solute pathways.  ES&T26: 485-491.

 Lydy, M.J., J.T. Oris,  P.C. Bauman, and S.W. Fisher.   1992. Effects of
 sediment organic carbon content on the elimination rates of neutral lipophilic
 compounds in the midge (Chironomus riparius).  ET&C 11:347-356.

 Nebeker, A.V., ST. Onjukka, D.G. Stevens, G.A. Chapman, and S.E. Dom-
 inguez.  1992.  Effects of low dissolved oxygen on survival,  growth and re-
 production of daphinia, hyalella and gammarus.  ET&C 11:373-379.

 Neiheisel,  J., W. McDaniel, and G. Panteleyev. In press. Sediment para-
 meters of northwest Black Sea shelf and slope:  Implications for transport of
 heavy metals and radionuclides.  JC&E.

 Pereira, W.E.,  F.D. Hostettler, and J.B. Rapp. 1992.  Bioaccumulation of
 hydrocarbons derived from terrestrial and anthropogenic sources in the
 Asian clam, Potamocorbula amurensis, in San Francisco Bay Estuary.
  Marine Pollution Bulletin 24(2):103-109.

  Squillace, P.J., and E.M. Thurman. 1992. Herbicide transport in rivers:
  Importance of hydrology and geochemistry in nonpoint source contamina-
 tion. 1992. £55726:538-545.

  Suter, G.W. II, and J.M. Loar. 1992. Weighing the ecological risk of hazard-
  ous waste sites:The Oak Ridge case. ES& 726:432-438.

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency (WH-585)
Washington, DC 20460

Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
FIRST CLASS MAIL
Postage and Fees Paid
EPA
G-35

-------