D
^
5~~*
r~
^c
o
v>
ON
ON
fl
O>
o S
O>
W
O
UC3
O Q>
•« S
a
o
-------
o
• T— <
"o
DC
-S
•!—I
6
S
o
O
o
o
op
d
PH
C3
C
O
U
OX)
O
O
oo
C3
c3
•g g
I
_0
00
a
w
cxo
o
O (N
OJ
o g
0
a o
H
m 5P
O
U
JM
O
8
W
« .SP
o
G
ea
< .
?Ti oo
i-H ^H
-G W
00 .-,
a o
H >
o
I
o
CN
CS
PH
-------
C
o
• PH
-^^
CJ
0
T3
O
^1
CD
bfi
nvo
^- o ^ o o >% a-
w)^ ^ ^ -2 ^ g
•§ 5 § S. 113
^ < g ?;^ g <
co co S* O CD _g
c CD O ^4 CX'-O ^
*-j r/3 CD •—' ""•
•^ co $j 03 a fe bfi
^ CD .1=5 r. -S -> JH
O O g §3 a 03 §
gi-llef i
"< M o # cs a s
- >^.2 « .2 S
&^ g S S > S-
•§ ^l^l-s 1
^S"SS|.g8
rt
o
in
4->
-a
CD
N
.1—1
a
60
o
0
H
.1—1
CO
.1— «
O
CD
-o
13
5-1.
CD
-o
CD
CO
£
CD
>.
•s
CD
0
S
CD
a
o
o
CD
S
J3
-M
O
o
o
&
o
CO
.1—1
1
-' *
involvement
a1
.1—1
3
• i— t
^
^D
^i
cS
«— *
g
F
n
§ C
O .1—1
"o ^2
A
at
g 8 1 § §
0 *? 13
s
IIIII-a II
<
o
ce
m
f
n
prog
hold
s EP
d cust
n
o
s
C
has
n a
ry
A
tio
d
ke
s
n
e
o
P
a
n
ak
ao
r, a
sinc
dvis
E
ip
s a
f acr
ders,
cy si
A
a
n staf
hold
gen
eder
ent
exp
enta
sto
agers and
ers, stake
by the Ag
r the Fede
lvement pr
iting exe
nm
e cu
e
ol
ic
erse
p
use
und
inv
soli
env
div
CO
*N
<
AH
W
ts
43
-*->
13
o
.1—1
•+- >
. ?— t
S-i
0
CO
CO
-(— >
• i— t-
CD
a
CO
0
^ _C!
S "3)
P •*
>*-"'—
w ^ ^
IS ° S
*73 •+-> ^
a s a
s
^
• 1—4
• i-H
4^ -
a
• !— I
CD
+J • CO 43
" 1-H
«"s
r\
CO
CO
JH
CO
-t— >
CO
o
0
*T3
§
5-^
S
CD
r£>
CO
r!*4
T3
o
>
^*
•s
^
•g
CD
1
*\
>^
g
• CD
tJ)
<
CD
<5
CO
/i S
CD
o
Cj
c3
•§
CD
T3
^~{
T3
CD
bfl
03
I
>— H
CD
£
^ 52
CD •-«
> CO
O co
M g
^ 8
03 OH
5-H >~i^
CD ^
co O
"3 ro
^ •>
c 3
HH CO
-i— >
C
o
s
^3
-t— >
CD
*-i
S
^s
s
• 1— i
a
s
a
• !-*
03
bfl
->->
CO
2
a
<
PH
w
CO
CD
• T-H
5
s— >
tM
O
13
. i-H
4—)
^
^'
O
OH
E
CD
!
CD
0
g
CD
vC
-!-»
C
O
CD
N
**""!
cti
-i— >
• I-H
&
O
-a
§
«\
CO
CD
CD
£J
CO
o -
s
a,
&
o
CO
'>
•3
CD
rS
erf
• i— H
>
T3
CD
W)
S
C3
43
O
X
8
•T3 .
a
c3
*T3
CD
ts
^H-
CD
.a
CD
tiD
^•J-J
immendations
o
o
/11
.-tt 'S • «
o 1 -2
•i— i G C
0 ° ^
^ 0 co
"O >. c3
C C" CD
cx3 O T3
_H CO •'-'
C •*-< K^
o > ^
.,-H ^J .-*5
^ «J 13
•^ co ^S
S .-tt cr
attention to
£
» 1—4
|.
0''
'to '
&
Q« c
•~t5
1
'I
VD
<
Wf-H
1
>»
f~\
03
s
1
'«+-<
O
CD
fi
O
CO
. 1— (
-£
o
&
s
04
CO
3
•a
•(-»
00
CO
• — <
XJ
H
4- 1
S
4-»
O
• 1— 1
—4
's-i
^ 1
IS
^ '
1
Q_}
^*^
• T-H
o >
>— M
^
C^
G^
ii
visory commi
•a
management of its
c
r-4
CO
CD
0^
J__l
ommiti
o
o
^H
>
"2
IN
bfi
^^
^^.
CLx
o
1 >
CO
&
CO
03
'T3
§
<
^
w
ta
CO
CD
advisory committe
-------
-------
..
o
U
a
GO
I
5-H
GO
"&
2
CO
^
(D
X>
CD
S
1
CO
a
CO
o
"el
o
§
CO
CD
CO
CO
XI
CO
O
O
0
o
CO
a
o
•i»i
+->
o
CO
• i— i
T3
G
CD
CO
-i— j
3
CO
— i
(D
I
5JD
-------
-------
=
WD
•^
^
a
CJ
ss
-------
c«
o
%
OQ
.2
•*— •
<+H
_g
'co
iinfectants/Di
s£
&, Pi
£°
t^4
^-<
£
1
3
O
O
"^
|
>-.
g
6
o
••^
&
0
O3
-o
-c3
o
&G
'- '
S
n
i
^<
8£'
S'S
i«
iS
o g
& S
o o
>J cS >•
I P
S g "S
§ So
5J
§
I
3
^
i
s
a
s
.«
&
o
en
-O
<
I
O
If "3
-------
FACA Reporting Tiers at EPA
•*->
5-H
ct^
^CJ CO
£ ••
3 O
>> fi
O
C bD
§" S
£ ^ 0 * -
r's principal Federal advisory "committees." These groi
ly to EPA, and MUST adhere to all advisory committee
ory Committee Management. Examples of Tier One gr
sory Council on Environmental Policy and Technology,
EPA had 25 Tier One groups.
?^ *-> OT ••••< <-».
0 0 ..-. > ON
g (U > -rt O\
' ^ •- 3 < >
bo-a < ^ G_
^ r2
^ 0) ~- j erf r-!
5
^ > 0 0
•*- -0 T3 « aj
2 * £ £ £
a aj i— i ^ -i_>
M js .-i --j
Illll
O s-i "i O O
& ^ CQ CJ
g •§ < b b
J5 & r>n O O
O -> S3
"2 ^ O "fi q^ ON
W U r>~\
(S3 ^>-. 'i-t !-< L_J
-(-> i*1^ Q rrt ^~1
WO en « H-> H- 1
bordinate to Tier One "parent" groups. Tier Two group
formally established with Agency approval. They cann
y cannot provide advice directly to EPA). Tier 2 group
ts of FACA and the GSA Rule, except the requirement
re the Environmental Health Committee (of SAB), Sani
and the Small Community Advisory Subcommittee of (
3 a, £ § £
2 "°^ ^ 3 ob ^
13 <-§• 2 |^
g U o M c? D
s< febl t d
^ss-i|e
11 glsj
ol-^l
.*iiifl
^3 S ^ •£ | J
1— J3 {4-l *O ^ 3
H o o KS W oo
5«
&
s
2
&x
o
H
L.
o
H
00
ro
» o o
S13-8
t §^ '§
-------
-------
CO
O
ON
co
CD CO
CD 50
j&
3
CD
O
CO
a
c
o
CD'
,— i
co
J
N « w • ^-
.2 &o a
o ^3 S. c
c^ « § -a
CD 03 d CD
00 *-£3 ,®( •> "3 ^
g «D
O^_J f™^ ^^ • i*^ ^J
r-l 4-» ^
CD
5— c
0 -
T^ >^"i (11
C 2.9 co
"-1 i-C C3 rrt
-O CD O §
^ 3 &1 § 1?
^ to & ^ H*
r-3 W^ pj .,_, CQ
g ^ 11 -3
g •§ S -S -g
I atS 8 §
CD
.a
CD
CO
18 of the 25 Tier 1 committees were establi
^-* N—^ ^-i ^^ ^ ^
1-C — ». ^ ^^^| C fl-\ *
"^ ^ cj 3 ^ rt ^
B CD 0 g ^^ b
0 g "42 g «g CD o
3 £ 8 ^ 'g £ PQ
>^^ ^ • i" ' \ U_/ ^\ _
The sharp increase beginning in FY91 was
focused on short duration issues, including
(in such areas as: acid rain, underground in
EPA, lead acid battery recycling, mining, r«
and accreditation of environmental laboratc
(Clean Air Act Advisory Committee due to
and the Environmental Financial Advisory
^5 a w -H :;
OT -5 . a £ J2
CD
-------
-------
0
-------
•u
CD
0)
CD
o
CO
CO
._ 2
0) ^
CD 75
o
(A
O
0
-Q
E
CD
o
o
CM
o
in
o
o
o
CO
cv
(£>
o>
CO
o
CM
o
o>
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
o
10
-------
5-1
CD
00
• T-H
(30
s
P4
5-H
CD
-d
CD
PH
CD
-a
CD
o
G
o
G
CD
CO
o O
O "O PH
03 £H gl j
71 co o
CO
CD
s
CD
oo
CD
2
13
00
O
,—I r*—i
S B,S
CD
CD
CD
co" •*-> ^
5—( G ^r>
CD CD ^
£ & s
s 8'
<3 o
CD ^
CO
rS ^
C^
C^_j ^^"^
o ^
c3
c o
1 .
•s^
CD 42
43 G
^ OH
G (u
QrS
oo +-1
(30 O
G ^
"•« c
CD CD
2 Cin
Fl O
00
OH
CD ~» 5—( fT^
§ "§ §
S SH
O
-------
(f)
(0
0)
o
X
o
O)
c*
CO
CO
CO
o
o
W
iZ
MS
CO
Q.
O
O
CM
L.
-------
o 23. W> o
3 S fe J3
CO 43 O ?3
CD
CD
O
CO
5-H
CD
CD
.K
CD
CD
CO
.
b H
§-9
•-H (U
-s 1
03 O-.
• r-H
f, ( »-M
O so
CD
P^» ^
"CD "o
-tj
03 CD
'CO
2
CO
'co
CO
03
o
t
CO
O
O
CO
OH
3
O
co • O
I *
CD CD
• 1—<
O- H
^ \-,
-------
-------
.
O
H
-------
-------
Ittees are considering include:
5
S
o
o
o
co
• i-H
'1
CO
w
CO
CD
CO
CO
.1— 1
o
CD
OJJ
CD
'i
EPA laboratories and research policy and planning
enting regulations
a
Costs and benefits of the Clean Air Act and its imple
OS
-------
-------
O
U
-------
CM
31
-8
CO 0
si"
-
ill CD
o _
> £5
o
o o *-
C W =5
£°
o
o s
o
id
o
•
o
p
id
o
•
o
ui
-------
»— <
03
>ntroversi
involved in complex and cc
j£»
toO
-1—H
03
CD
^H
O
CD
e
o
o
CD
03
03
PH
P-l
03
O
CD
toO
_G
/-s
CD
a
i environ
owerment, community-base<
.nagement, requiring greater
Q- S
issues (e.g., regulatory reinvention, local em
protection, and cooperative environmental rr
CD
£ G
[7— 1 .r- 1 -
. ft
^ ?
G G
O S
•j3 5^
- ^
o ^S
s on recommendations and s
,nd meetings has influenced
3 ro
public/stakeholder involvement and consens
resulting increases in committees, members,
expenditures for advisory committees.
03 .-H
03 g
CD O
0 G°
ft'o^
^1
o ro
03 ^
'S- M
K* ••— 1
"C3 ^
03 <
CD PH
^ w
s "
> CD
2 %
^ -s
S?
"-1 G
0 CD
-t-> OH
w ^
CD
improving the efficiency of operations (e.g.,
automating committee management informa
CD 1-T-s
OT 'G
"o
toO ..$
JJ\ * -4™J
o< o
>•> toO
tooH
f paper, teleconferences insi
*-< u
exploring more cost-effective techniques for
electronic means of communication in place
fr
of adviso
ions.
); and enhancing the quality
w up on those recommendat
03 0
and new technologies to reduce support cost
committee recommendations and EPA's foil
1
5-1
0
s
03
O
toO
B
i
CD
OK
o3
The increased attention to cost effectiveness
03
P
O
•1— (
>
CD
!-i
O<
CD
.T5
-i— >
S
T3
CD
8
t
• O
0
§
1
ON
ON
>-
PH
G
• *-H
O3
$3.6M reduction in advisory committee cost
T3
i
«N .
03 ?_,
W «
H >,
^ 0?
•N ^-4
03 P
in the number of committee
ained the same as the previo
03 G .
year. This reduction reflects FY99 decrease
members - while the number of meetings rei
-------
-------
o
s
o
o
-------
sses of its advisory
f the Federal
successful. FACA
e, recommendation's,
; advisory committees
CD o
0 CD
<^ CO
P O
CO Q^
*V g
*U o .
£^ pniBii^
~
£ ja
cfr.2
•j-j co
"S cd
§ -°
nd to
o 1
o jg
$*
.1— ( CO
£** CD
CO •£<
o o
S °o
§*g
81
, y^
cd (i,
§|
co rt
£ -2
-g CO
• T— H ^-4
S'§
a. a
O O-i
o o
>» CD
^< co
0 fe
a .§ ^
Q > •'-;
^13
^"^1
O jzj
co s-3 «
• <— I CO
>
T3
% CD
CO .-H
1
O
CD
O
to
O
"reports" containing
took a variety of
mendations and
i — i
T— 1
1 1
^
-t->
»!— (
^
>%
O
s
v*^
^
CD
£
-o
CD
S
CD
CO
CD
?-<
^
CO
CD
I
a
a
o
o
o
CO
1
ON
PH
HH
Those reports
aries of recom
d opinions.
§
r\
c^
CD
rs
c\
ry^
mendation:
ice, recomi
^
^
oj
a
a
^
CO
*N
CO
W)
C5
• f— 4
?_,
^^
CD
1
ttO
1
<4-H
O co'
CO "tn
J=5 O
G O i
co CD
2 i
C\ *~ ' ?
00 cS
il
< — i 03
S-8"
*-H *>
O 'O
>^>
O
a
CD
txO
.a
CD
oJj
O
a
• 1»H
CO
CD
a
CD
O
CD
.Sn
CO
)mmendati
"^
o
CD
;~i
CD
CD
4=J
• i— <
a
a
o
0
fr
o
CO
«T— 1
^
^
"^
• •
a
• T-H
1
X
CD
O
'3
0
• T—^
o
"~j
o
C^H
ir Excellence Awards
<
§
-------
ex
_o
13
d>
T3
ons for modifying NPDES policies which assisted EPA as it
ed to sanitary sewer overflows due to storm water
"H^
Q "S
13
r~| o3
G • £
i-C ^
"0 o>
0 |
O 4-1
|l
C^_( ^C t/D
-OT bbiti
o1
&* 4J
c3 a
S C
bb ^
o
^ ^
o> "§
"o3 °
ption of an environmental justice council model by several si
isiana), and a model Plan for Public Participation by various
-§ ^
< j
jrnal combustion
4~i
.a «
Ǥ '^
co ^<
$-1 !-<
9*2
*-4 H— *
ex o
£P S
ice and recommendations resulting in EPA establishing testil
nes and boilers leading to emission standards for those sourc
*5 'bfl
< §
- Q^
§ §
co r")
C ^^
8 •*-•
1 1
bo a
CD .CS
^o
T3 *•<
p. oj
>"'"( ^*^
ice and recommendations that assisted the Agency as it deve
ted to drinking water, including the first published Drinking '
-a *
.'< ^
-o
§
•4— >
I
bO
a
a .
G
O
'S
.
in
£
.a
sport used by EPA as the basis for reorganizing the Agency's
rmation resources projects, programs, and offices
& i2
< .a
Dr assessing
f j"~
13
o
S-
5-1 -
"5S
cj
o3
"o
ex
o
dee and recommendations used by the Agency when it devel<
atile Organic Compound risks from waste management units
F'C3 O
< >
-------
(D
' Response plan
>^%
G
r and Emer
,OJ
4—»
CO
03
CO
Q
o
0,
CO
CO
CD
o
o
03
0
'G
o
*-j
o
13
cies instant
response agen
CD
i — t
'55
o
o-
CO
s
JO
~03
gulations to
CD
^
3
CO
CD
00
O
C5
00
.S
$— i
CO
o
commendati
£
c
03
CD
.<->
">
Ui
_CD
"o
CD
CD
JO
0
CO
CO
03
00
per year of
CO
G
O
O
0
0^
cT
0
CN
13
1
o
&,
"03
<$
O
CO
co"
CD
JO
CD
0
O
o
I
13
o
-i_>
CO
"o
CO
CO
CD
O
CD
5-1
1
"cti
CO
O
d,
CO
^3
5-c
O
•*— > °
• f«4
G
0
S
a
^
t
o
o
T3
G
levision a
(D
•*-»
^-j— -(
0
CO
-1— >
CO
0
O
•3
CO
CD
f\
way that reduc
generation
VH
<2
1
• i— t
G
O
'•S
03
s— »
G
CD
S
g the implej
.S
13
-a
"
G
CD
00
<
CD
-a
£
T3
CD
CO
^
CO
g
O
commendati
-o
G
03
CD
_O
03
G
O
'So
CD
-t— >
<§
CO
-o
55
• i— t
^
a
"G
CD
3
6
"cd
C
O
'-§
^
s
«
g
CD
J33
3
'•4—1
03
a,
G
03
revised ozone
haze program
-------
I
©
=
-------
"S
[anagement Improveme
o
CO
• 1-H
1
CO
O
CO
0
I
O
CD
tnge of activities to improv
V.VJ
^
CD
*o
• r—l
^
ffj
s»
• I— (
2
23
2
OH
CO
•T— <
i
ts
-o
o
'£
o
is
o
_0
"a?
C
"X3
C
o3
^
CD
J3
«'
bO
3
3
CO
2
trative burdens
CO
and processes by removing admin
ning requirements
Streamlii
•
ary committee members and Agency
CO
leful, and relevant guidance to adv:
VJ
2
c\
^2
J2*
*0
J5
4)
!-,
0
s
to
Providin
•
?«
03
to1
w
-a
a
03
o
2
a
-i-j
CO
(D
CO
3
"O
(U
T3
C
(D
CO
C/3
p
^
Q
03
>>
.tJ
O
c3
CX
>
«««<
X!
•y
C
O
S
cd
rs
^T
s-^
O
£
4->
Z
O
fe
p
\*
o
•4-J
4w
O
c
o
'•s
2
O
s
o
1
c§
.S
-4— >
fi
P
t3
3
o
"S
«
CO
2
o<
-------
C '
•*••<
O
o
Future Directions For the Advis
*cL
&••
• i-H
CO
OH
"o
CD
*O
Committee Policy and Oversight Staff has
CD
£— <
T3
-t->
CO
CD
60
PH CD
2 c*
kplan focused on further improvements in 1
imittees. Areas addressed in the workplan
5-1 H
> §
!> 0
on Advisory Committee Management
-------
------- |