US - MEXICO
    Border XXI Program
 1996 Implementation Plans
        October 1996
           EPA16O-R-96-OO4
Environment • Natural Resources • Environmental Health

-------

-------
   US-MEXICO
   Border XXI Program
1996 Implementation Plans
      October 1996

-------

-------
                    Table of Contents
Introduction



Natural Resources



Water



Environmental Health



Air



Hazardous & Solid Waste



Contingency Planning & Emergency Response



Environmental Information Resources



Pollution Prevention



Cooperative Enforcement and Compliance



Glossary
Page




   1




   3




  20



  40



  60




  70



  78




  83




  87



  96



 103
October 1996

-------

-------
              1996 BORDER XXI ANNUAL WORKGROUP

                         IMPLEMENTATION PLANS


What are the objectives of Border XXI?

The Border XXI Program (Border XXI or Program) is an innovative binational effort which brings
together the diverse U.S. and Mexican federal entities responsible for the shared border environment
to work cooperatively toward sustainable development through protection of human health and the
environment as well as proper management of natural resources in each country. The Border XXI
Framework Document (Framework Document) is a product of extensive public input which defines
five-year objectives for the border environment and describes mechanisms for fulfilling those
objectives by facilitating federal and state involvement.

Nine binational Border XXI Workgroups will implement the Program by integrating the efforts of
participating entities and defining specific projects to meet Border XXI objectives. Each Workgroup
is lead by a U.S. and Mexican Cochairperson.  The Workgroups will ensure effective coordination
of bilateral efforts by bringing together federal agencies from both countries with a wide array of
environmental interests and perspectives.  All of the Workgroups are committed to  actively
encouraging state participation in their endeavors. The Workgroups are in the process of exploring
the development of subgroups  and  other mechanisms  to assure the participation  of border
communities in their implementation of the Program.

The Border XXI Workgroups are (1) water, (2) air, (3) hazardous and solid waste, (4) pollution
prevention, (5) contingency planning and emergency response, (6) cooperative enforcement and
compliance, (7) environmental information resources, (8) natural resources, and (9) environmental
health. These nine Workgroups will meet individually as necessary and will convene as a whole at
least once a year.

What are the Border XXI  Annual Implementation Plans?

Each year, the nine Workgroups  will develop Border XXI Annual Implementation Plans. These
Annual Implementation Plans will identify federal funding  levels for a given year and, based upon
available funds, describe specific projects that will advance the long-term objectives outlined in the
Framework Document. The Annual Implementation Plans  ensure correlation of short-term budget
realities with the long-term objectives identified in the Framework Document.

The  1996 Implementation Plans are enclosed in this document.  The 1996 Implementation Plans
provide basic information on those projects which will be initiated and/or implemented by the
Workgroups based on 1996 budget allocations.

Beginning in 1997, the Workgroups will develop and release their Annual Implementation Plans early
in the calendar year.  From 1997 forward, in addition  to information  contained  in the 1996
implementation plans (federal funding levels for the year and specific projects based on those funding
levels), the Annual Implementation Plans will include an assessment of progress in implementing
specific projects.
October 1996

-------
How can the public participate in the Border XXI Program?

The Border XXI Framework Document outlines the Program in detail and describes mechanisms for
public  participation which  include biennial public forums,  ongoing  communication with  the
Workgroup Cochairpersons, binational subgroups and other mechanisms to channel local perspectives
into the Border XXI Workgroups, public advisory boards, mechanisms for increasing public access
to information, support for academic research  on the border environment, and grant programs to
support community involvement.

The EPA San Diego and El Paso Border Liaison Offices can provide you with  a copy of the
Framework Document and answer your questions about Border XXI. These offices can be reached
by calling 800-334-0741.
                                                                           October 1996

-------
                  NATURAL RESOURCES WORKGROUP
                       1996 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
CONTACTS:
                 '   U.S.
 Cochair:
   Nick Palacios
   Department of the Interior
   Bureau of Reclamation
   300 E. 8th Street, Room 801
   Austin, TX 78701
   phone:     (512) 916-5641
 Contact:
   Susan Lieberman
   Department of the Interior
   MIB4429
   1849C Street, NW
   Washington, DC 20240
   phone:     (202)208-5160
                 Mexico
Cochair:      .-.-'',
  Javier de la Masa
  Coordinador de Areas Naturales Protegidas
  INE-SEMARNAP
  Ave. Revoluci6nl425
  Col. Tlacapac-San Angel
  Delegaci6n Alvaro Obregon
  Mexico, DF  CP01040
  phone:    (525) 624-3334

Contact:
  Celia Pigueron and/or Pia Gallina
  INE-SEMRNAP
  phone:    (525) 624-3338
  Ave. Revoluci6nl425
  Col. Tlacapac-San Angel
  Delegacion Alvaro Obregon
  Mexico, DF  CP01040
  phone:    (525) 624-3336
           (525) 624-3338
PROJECTS:

Project:  Training Course on Management Planning of Protected Areas in Mexico

Purpose: To provide participants with a general introduction and field experience on management
and strategic planning of protected natural areas.

Funding: To be determined.

Partners: National Park Service, Institute Nacional de Ecologia, ProFauna, Nature Conservancy.

Description: This is a course on "Introduction to Park Management" for Mexico protected areas
managers. It includes formal classroom sessions and field trips to protected areas in Mexico and the
United States. End product is a strategic plan for a protected area.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•      Develop and implement management plans for all federal protected areas in the border zone
       and exchange relevant experiences.
•      Design and conduct training courses and workshops regarding protected area management,
       protected area planning, environmental education, legislation, and new conservation methods
       along the border.

Contact: Howard Ness, NPS, (505)646-7880; fax (505)646-8083.
October 1996

-------
Natural Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Project: Exchange of Biological Data and Information Networks with CONABIO     :

Purpose:  To identify joint areas of interest and link the efforts of the Biological Resources Division
(BRD) of USGS on the National Biological Information Infrastructure (NBII) with development of
the CONABIO biodiversity information system.

Funding: To be determined.

Partners:   BRD, Information and Technology Services Office; Mexican Commission on the
Understanding and Use of Biodiversity (CONABIO).

Description: BRD and CONABIO will pursue cooperative activities to establish meta-data standards
for biological data and  information.   They will develop directories of taxonomic expertise and
taxonomic collections in the U.S. and Mexico.  They will pilot a project to electronically catalog
selected specimens of plants and animals collected in Mexico that reside in the Smithsonian National
Museum of Natural History. Other activities will also be initiated and information summarizing
activities are already available at the Internet address: http://www. nbs.gov/nbii/.

Relevant Border XXI Objective:
•      Cooperate in the development of mutually accessible information systems, identifying status,
       trends, and research priorities of shared biological resources.

Contact:  Larry Ludke, BRD, (314)876-1808; fax (314)876-1855
          Hesiquio Benites, CONABIO, (5) 554-43-32; fax (5) 554-74-72.
Project: Lower Rio Grande Ecosystem Initiative

Purpose:  To improve multisector user access to biological data and information about the ecosystem
and to assess the status, trends and threats to biological diversity and ecosystem integrity.

Funding: $175,000 U.S.

Partners: Midwest Science Center, BRD; National Park Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service;
USGS; Biological Evaluation of Status and Trends (BEST), BRD; CONABIO.

Description:  To  ensure better management arid  conservation of biological resources while
supporting sustained development, it will be necessary to understand all of the interdependent facets
that interact on the landscape. This activity is intended to facilitate data gathering and access to
information that will promote enlightened management decisions that are based on sound science.

Initial efforts will focus on developing an extensive bibliography of existing information related to
biological diversity and sources of threats to biodiversity in the lower Rio Grande Valley. Emphasis
at first  will highlight species  and activities in protected areas.  Results are intended to assist
conservation managers and developers in promoting good conservation and sustained development.
                                                                               October 1996

-------
                                                Natural Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Relevant Border XXI Objectives;
•      Cooperate in the development of mutually accessible information systems, identifying status,
       trends, and research priorities of shared biological resources.
•      Design and conduct training courses and workshops regarding protected area management,
       protected area planning, exchange of relevant experiences  among personnel from both
       countries, environmental education, legislation, and new conservation methods along the
       border.

Contact: Larry Ludke,BRD, (314)876-1808; fax (314)876-1855
         Hesiquio Benites, CONABIO, (5) 554-43-32; fax (5) 554-74-72.  .
Project; Binational Fire Management Agreement

Purpose:  To develop and implement a binational agreement for international fire management. The
objective is to establish a mechanism for the U.S. Department of the Interior and SEMARNAP to (1)
provide cooperative fire management along the international border, (2) address needs for technical
assistance, and (3) cooperate in the use of fire as a natural resource management tool.

Funding: This is primarily a cooperative effort with in-kind services contributed by each partner.

Partners:  U.S. Department of the Interior and Secretaria del Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales
yPesca.

Description:  The significant natural and cultural resources shared by Mexico and the United States
can quickly be consumed by human-caused or natural fires. A mechanism is needed to efficiently
manage fires which threaten a neighboring country's resources. Opportunities for technical assistance
also need to be identified and addressed in the agreement.  This will strengthen and build capacity to
manage fires quickly and with the least loss of natural and cultural resources.  The use of fire also can
be an excellent management tool for manipulating vegetation communities.  Cooperative efforts will
improve shared ecosystems and reduce the spread of undesirable plant communities.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•      Refine mechanisms for preparing, preventing, and responding to wildfires through expansion
       of regional collaboration and improved fire management activities.
•      Continue to build and expand links between research and management of forests, rangeland
       and soils.  Fundamental to this is promoting a consistent and compatible classification and
       inventory system for soils and ecosystems to better coordinate binational research activities
       and resource management planning, especially with regard to soils and the evaluation of
       desertification processes.

Contact:  Beau McClure, BLM, (602)650-1207; fax (602)650-0398.
October 1996

-------
Natural Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Project: Upper San Pedro River Basin Binational Education/Training Project

Purpose: To share knowledge and scientific and cultural information with concerned parties to
enhance protection and the long-term sustainability of the Upper San Pedro River Basin. The long-
term objective is binational sustainable resource management of the Upper San Pedro River Basin.

Funding: A cooperative effort primarily with in-kind services contributed by each partner.

Partners: U.S. Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, University of Arizona, U.S.
Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service, Sonora Department of Ecology, Centra
Ecologico de Sonora, University of Sonora, and AGFD.

Description:  The Upper San Pedro River Basin is a shared resource, with human and wildlife
communities depending on the limited water and interconnected resources which are dependent on
the river. The Basin and its associated resources are a common concern to the United States and
Mexico. A collaborative Ecosystem Program Team has been organized to define issues and to
develop an environmental  education/training package for the Upper San Pedro River Basin.
Resource managers, technicians, scientists, and academia are part  of the team that will exchange
information between Mexico and the U.S. A workshop for 20 participants (10 from Mexico and 10
from the U.S.) is scheduled on the Upper San Pedro River Basin in  September 1996.  Issues are to
be identified and an action plan for further education/training efforts in subsequent years is to be
developed at that workshop.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•      Promote the protection, conservation, and utilization of a biodiversity program in the border
       region, and  the  establishment of controlled production units as strategies for restoring
       threatened and endangered flora and fauna.
•      Establish and implement conservation plans for species of special interest.
•      Support the adoption of ecosystem management  principles that  further sustainable
       development in local communities.                    .
•      Design and conduct training courses and workshops regarding protected area management,
       protected area planning,  exchange of relevant  experiences among personnel from  both
       countries, environmental  education, legislation,  and new conservation methods along the
       border.
•      Promote sustainable management  of natural resources in the entire border zone through
       productive projects to improve the .quality of life for local communities.

Contact: Beau McClure, BLM, (602)650-1207; fax (602)650-0398.
Project: The Restoration of Desert Riparian Vegetation in the Santa Cruz River

Purpose: To protect and restore ecosystem values for riparian habitats along the U.S.-Mexico
border.

Funding: To be determined.
                                                                              October 1996

-------
                                               Natural Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Partners: USFWS, NRCS, AGFD, Nature Conservancy, Institute Ecologico de Sonora.

Description:  The Santa Cruz River is considered one of the most important riparian corridors in
southern Arizona and Sonora, Mexico.  This area is of extreme importance to neotropical migratory
birds, Such as cuckoos, orioles sulphur-bellied flycatcher and the willow flycatcher.  The narrow
riparian zone provides migratory stopovers, resting and nesting habitat for neotropical wildlife.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•      Promote the protection* conservation, and utilization of a biodiversity program in the border
       region, and the establishment of controlled production units as strategies for restoring
       threatened and endangered flora and fauna.
•      Improve and expand the protection of species and habitats in the border zone.

Contact: Sam Spiller, FWS, (602)640-2720; fax (602)640-2730.
Project: National Aerial Photography Program

Purpose: To coordinate the collection of aerial photography every five years to include border states
of Mexico.

Funding: To be determined.

Partners: USFS, USGS, other federal agencies.

Description: The original objective of this project was to update aerial photography maps of the 48
contiguous states every five years.  In order to improve resource management programs and update
inventories of natural resources oh an ecosystem scale, it is being proposed to expand this aerial
photography mapping effort to include the northern states of Mexico.  In that way, research and
resource projects along the border could be monitored, interpreted and analyzed more effectively.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•      Cooperate in the development of mutually accessible information systems, identifying status,
       trends, and research priorities of shared biological resources.
•      Continue to build and expand links between research and management of forests, rangeland
       and soils. Fundamental to this is promoting a consistent and compatible classification and
       inventory system for soils and ecosystems to better coordinate binational research activities
       and resource management planning.

Contact:  Ken Osborne, USGS, (303)202-4138.
Project: Arizona Fire Ecology Program and Border Area Fire Suppression

Purpose:  To improve research, management and local community understanding of the important
role of fire in maintaining certain ecosystems; continue to jointly suppress fires along the Coronado
October 1996

-------
Natural Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

National Forest and states of Sonora-Chihuahua border; and continue to provide fire suppression
training to those located along the border.

Funding: To be determined.

Partners: USD A Forest Service Coronado National Forest, Sequoia National Forest, Lincoln
National Forest, Prescott National Forest, Rocky Mountain Research Station, University of Arizona,
University of Sonora, and SEMARNAP-Sonora-Chihuahua.

Description:  Historically, the naturally induced fires in the remote forest areas have not been put
out while fires in forests near the more populated areas have been suppressed. Little was understood
about the relationship between the vegetation and fire.  The role that fire plays in the maintenance of
ecosystems along the Arizona-Sonora-Chihuahua border is now better understood.  Many species
within these ecosystems are dependent on fire to regenerate. We now have a unique opportunity to
set up research plots in areas where fire has been suppressed as well as where it has been left to burn
within the same ecosystem. Much can be learned by comparing the vegetation within these areas to
determine the role that fire has played to maintain this vegetation type. For those species that we now
know are dependent on fire for survival, like apache and ponderosa pine, use of prescribed burning
to maintain these  species should be implemented.  This program also  proposes to develop an
education effort to assist local communities to identify a process for deciding whether to extinguish
existing fires or let them continue to burn.

A binational crew exists to respond to fires along the Coronado National Forest-states of Sonora-
Chihuahua border.  However, at this time there are four trained crews to respond to protect nine
million hectares (22,500,000 acres) of land. It is proposed that three additional crews be assembled,
and that these crews be based outside the communities (located closer to likely occurrence of fire
breakouts) on the Mexico side of the border.  Through the North American Forestry Commission Fire
Management Study Group, helitack and basic fire training could be given to these  crews as well as
instruction on the use of prescribed burning to reduce fire danger.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•      Refine mechanisms for preparing, preventing, and responding to wildfires through expansion
       of regional collaboration and improved fire management activities.
•      Implement programs to restore and enhance soil and forest resources to improve nursery
       management, silvicultureal practices, and soil protection with emphasis on  native species.
•      Encourage the conservation and sustainable use  of forest,  rangeland, soil, and wildlife
       resources as a fundamental part of ecosystem management through collaboration with local
       communities and public participation.
• ,     Continue to build and expand links between research and management of forests, rangeland
       and soils.  Fundamental to this is promoting a consistent and compatible classification and
       inventory system for soils and ecosystems to better coordinate binational research activities
       and resource management planning.

Contact:  John Edwards, USFS, (505)842-3424; fax (505)842-3801.
                                                                               October 1996

-------
                                                Natural Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan
Project: Reintroduction of Gould's Turkey
Purpose:  Continue the transfer of Gould's turkey, an extirpated species in the U.S., from Sonora to
Arizona while assuring the maintenance of a healthy population in Sonora.

Funding:  To be determined.

Partners: USFS-Coronado National Forest, Arizona State Fish & Game, FWS, SEMARNAP-
Sonora.

Description:  Gould's turkey is a species that used to be found in Arizona in the Coronado National
Forest. It disappeared from the area but is still prevalent in the state of Sonora, Mexico, For the last
two years, 10 to 20 turkeys a year have been brought into Arizona from Sonora. It is proposed that
this transfer of turkeys from Mexico continue. In addition, it is important that an inventory of the
turkey population in Sonora is completed this year to ensure that the Mexico population Continues
to grow.

Relevant Border XXI Objective:
•      Promote the protection, conservation, and utilization of a biodiversity program in the border
       region and the establishment  of controlled production units as  strategies for  restoring
       threatened and endangered flora and fauna.

Contact:  Vicky Estrada-Bustillo, USFS, (505)842-3424; fax (505)842-3801.
Project: Assessment, Inspection and Training for Reduction of Forest Pests and Disease at the
         Border

Purpose:  Assess the potential risks that insects and diseases transported across the border may have
on forests on either side of the border.  Increase inspection efforts to minimize these risks and
implement training efforts for foresters on either side of the border on the recognition of cross-border
forest insects and diseases.

Funding: To be determined.

Partners: USFS, APHIS, SEMARNAP, PROFEPA, U.S. Customs Service.

Description:  Due to the increased transfer of logs between the U.S. and Mexico, the number of
forest insects and diseases crossing the border has also increased. In some areas like Oregon and
Washington, diseases and insect problems are on the increase. A risk assessment is already underway
to determine the potential effects on forests.  What is also needed is an increase in the number of
inspectors and additional training of these inspectors to help them more effectively identify disease
or pest-infected logs.  In addition, foresters along either side of the border need additional training
to accurately recognize the insects and diseases as well as the visible early signs and symptoms on the
trees.
October 1996

-------
Natural Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•      Improve forest health through strengthened monitoring and enforcement with respect to
       forestry and wildlife uses, and land use modifications. Promote verification of phytosanitary
       conditions of forest species, products and by-products during transportation, storage, and
       trade, with a focus on ports and border crossings.
•      Continue to build and expand links between research and management of forests, rangeland
       and soils. Fundamental to this is promoting a consistent and compatible classification and
       inventory system for soils and ecosystems to better coordinate binational research activities
       and resource management planning, especially with regard to soils and the evaluation of
       desertification processes.

Contact: Larry Allen, NRCS, (505)842-3424.


Project: Assessment of Forest Air Pollution Impact in Western  and Eastern United States and
         Central Mexico

Purpose: Improve the genetic quality of local species in Southern California as a result of monitoring
of ozone injury to native trees species and climatic variables at forest sites.

Funding: To be determined.

Partners:  USFS-Pacific Southwest Experimental Station, SEMARNAP, INIFAP, Pennsylvania
State University.

Description:  Climatic conditions have a decisive influence on forest response to ozone injury and
the cumulative effects of nitrogen and sulfur compounds.  The study will standardize procedures and
methods, and begin simultaneous measurements of climate, pollution exposure and tree response at
sites with distinctly different climates in California, Pennsylvania, and Central Mexico.  Results will
aid assessment of global climate changes influences on forest ecosystem response to photochemical
oxidant pollution.

Relevant Border XXI Objective:
•      Improve and expand the protection  of species and habitats in the border zone.
•      Reduce the effects of global climate change through improvement of local air quality by
       promoting forestation and reforestation within the border area.

Contact: Paul Miller, USFS, (505)842-3424.
Project: Practices for the Sustainable Use of Forests

Purpose: Develop "Best Management Practices" manual and provide training seminars on the
implementation of "Best Management Practices" in both the U.S. and Mexico.

Funding: To be determined.
10
                                                                               October 1996

-------
                                               Natural Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Partners: USFS-Region 3, SEMAKNAP, Ejido Basaseachi.

Description:  This project will support the implementation of sustainable forestry practices through
the development of a forest management plan that addresses environmental impacts of management
actions, forest road planning and the application and evaluation of silvicultural practices. Best
practices will be demonstrated at a site in Ejido Basaseachi.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•      Encourage the conservation and sustainable use of forest,  rangeland, soil, and wildlife
       resources as a fundamental part of ecosystem management through collaboration with local
       communities and public participation.
•      Implement programs to restore and enhance soil and forest activities, including nursery
       management, silvicultural methods, and soil protection, with an emphasis on native species.
•      Continue to build and expand links between research and management of forests, rangeland
       and soils. Fundamental to this is promoting a consistent and compatible classification and
       inventory system for soils and ecosystems to better coordinate binational research activities
       and resource management planning, with particular consideration given to land use-soil
       changes that lead to desertification.

Contact:  Doug Shaw, USFS, (505)842-3424.
Project: Coronado National Forest-State of Sonora Sister Forest Program

Purpose: Through long-term interdisciplinary sharing of managers and resources, current as well
as newly arising issues and problems can be jointly solved.  Another of the objectives will be to
improve management and conservation capabilities within the Sierra de Los Ajos, Buenos Aires, and
La Purica Natural Protected Areas while continuing to harvest commodities.

Funding: To be determined.

Partners: USFS-Coronado National Forest, SEMARNAP-Sonora, Centre Ecologico.

Description: Various issues have been identified for implementation in FY 96. They include the
training and use of GIS and GPS equipment to improve mapping information in Sonora, assist in the
detection and treatment of insects, training in fire suppression, prescribed burning for fuels reduction
and fire ecology research development.  In order to assist NPA managers in maintaining a balance
between harvesting commodities and preserving the resources, SEMARNAP state representatives
and  an interdisciplinary team  from the Coronado National Forest  will  develop an ecosystem
management plan for Sierra de Los Ajos with an emphasis on fire management. The plan will also
focus on the improvement of the transportation system, improve watershed management and continue
management of the Gould's turkey.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•      Encourage the conservation and sustainable use of forest, rangeland, soil, and wildlife
       resources as a fundamental part of ecosystem management through collaboration with local
       communities and public participation.
October 1996
11

-------
Natural Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

•      Refine mechanisms for preparing, preventing, and responding to wildfires through expansion
       of regional collaboration and improved fire management activities.
•      Improve forest health through strengthened monitoring and enforcement with respect to
       forestry and wildlife uses, and land use modifications. Promote verification of phytosanitary
       conditions of forest species, products and by-products during transportation, storage, and
       trade, with a focus on ports and border crossings.
•      Continue to build and expand links between research and management of forests, rangeland
       and soils. Fundamental to this is promoting a consistent and compatible classification and
       inventory system for soils and ecosystems to better coordinate binational research activities
       and resource management planning, especially with regard to soils and the evaluation of
       desertification processes.

Contact: Mr. Larry Allen, NRCS, (505)842-3424.
Project: Implementation of the Management Program for the Alto Golfo de California v Delta del
         Rio Colorado Biosphere Reserve

Purpose: Develop activities aimed at protecting and preserving the enforcement of environmental
policies, lines of authority, and standards established by the Reserve, through the cooperation of
federal, state, and municipal governments, local communities, academia, and other entities.

Funding: $1,770,157 pesos from INE.

Partners: INE's Center for Scientific and Technological Investigations at the University of Sonora.

Description:  The protection and preservation projects for implementation of the Management
Program will be developed during the first year, and will be carried out by Reserve personnel.  The
program consists of supervision, protection, and conservation of the natural resources in the area;
zoning and dissemination; analysis of the current situation of fisheries; and a specific program for
ecotourism management.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•      Promote sustainable management of natural resources in the entire border zone through
       productive projects to improve the quality of life for local communities.
•      Support  the adoption of ecosystem  management  principles  that  further sustainable
       development in local communities.
•      Manage natural protected areas to guarantee the conservation of ecosystems and biodiversity.
•      Develop and implement management plans for all federal protected areas in the border zone
       and exchange relevant experiences.
•      Establish and implement conservation plans for species of special interest.
•      Facilitate participation from state and municipal authorities, Indian nations, nongovernmental
       organizations,  and local communities in all aspects of conservation activities.
•      Initiate training, educational programs, and outreach activities that support marine and aquatic
       resources through cooperative investigations, exchange of technology and improved user
       access to data.
12
                                                                                October 1996

-------
                                               Natural Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Contact:  Gelia Pigueron, UCANP-INE, (5)624-36-06; fax (5)624-35-89.


Project: Implementation of the Management Program for El Pinacate y Gran Desierto de Altar
        Biosphere Reserve

Purpose:  Develop activities aimed at protecting and preserving the enforcement of environmental
policies, lines of authority; and standards established by the Management Program.

Funding: $1,331,007 pesos from INE.

Partners: INE, academic and research institutions, as well as local organizations.

Description:   During the first year,  the  following Management Program  projects will  be
implemented:

a) Protection and preservation will be carried out by Reserve personnel and consist of supervision,
monitoring, protection, and preservation of the natural resources of the Reserve.

b) Zoning and dissemination will be carried out by the Sonoran Ecological Center and consist in
defining priority areas to place the signs and create brochures and placards for the Reserve.

c) Study of nonmetallic mineral extraction activities, to determine those sites where the extraction of
morusa can take place with minimal impact.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•      Promote sustainable management of natural resources in the entire border zone through
       productive projects to improve the quality of life for local communities, such as supporting
       the adoption of ecosystem management principles that further sustainable development in
       local communities.
•      Establish an organizational structure and joint inspection committees for protected areas.
•      Design and conduct training courses and workshops regarding protected area management,
       protected area planning, environmental education, legislation, and new conservation methods
        along the border.
•      Manage natural protected areas to guarantee the conservation of ecosystems and biodiversity.
•      Develop and implement management plans for all federal protected areas in the border zone
        and exchange relevant experiences.
•      Establish and implement conservation plans for species of special  interest.

Contact: Celia Pigueron, UCANP-INE, (5)624-36-06; fax (5)624-35-89.
 Project: Emerging Program for Area de Proteccion de Flora y Fauna Maderas del Carmen. Coahuila

 Purpose:  Develop a program from which human,  material, and  financial resources allow the
 establishment of basic administration, protection and dissemination actions for the Area de Proteccion
 de Flora y Fauna Maderas del Carmen.
 October 1996
                                                                                        13

-------
 Natural Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

 Funding: $ 1,174,142 pesos from INE.      •                                          .

 Partners: INE.

 Description:  The Emerging Program consists of the following activities:

 a) Resource protection that includes traversing the area, forest fire prevention and control, and
 community participation in the protection of resources and species.

 b) Basic administration and operation: contracting personnel to administer financial, human, and
 material resources; and operation and enforcement indicators of the Emerging Program.

 c) Zoning and dissemination, consisting in the location, manufacturing, and placement of placards and
 signs in the Reserve, design, publication, and circulation of a brochure with basic information for the
 protected area.                                     ,                        ,

 Relevant Border XXI Objectives:                                   .   ..-
 •      Promote research and  investigations of habitats and species of flora and fauna, to initiate
       management and protection programs that concentrate on biodiversity and the sustainable
       use of resources.                                     .         ,
 •      Promote  sustainable management of natural resources in the entire border zone through
       productive projects to improve the quality of life for local communities.
 •      Support the adoption  of ecosystem  management  principles  that further  sustainable
       development.                                          .
 •      Develop and implement management plans for all federal protected areas in the border zone
       and exchange relevant experiences.
 •      Establish an organizational structure and joint inspection committees for protected areas.
 •      Manage natural protected areas to guarantee conservation of ecosystems and biodiversity.
 •      Facilitate participation from state and municipal authorities,  Indian nations, nongovernmental
       organizations, universities, and local communities in all aspects of conservation activities.

 Contact:  Celia Pigueron, UCANP-INE, (5)624-36-06; fax (5)624-35-89.
Project: Emerging Program of Areas de Proteccion de Flora y Fauna Canon de Santa Elena,
         Chihuahua

Purpose:  Develop a program from which human, material,  and financial resources permit the
establishment  of basic  administration, protection, and dissemination actions for the Area  de
Proteccion de Flora y Fauna Canon de Santa Elena de Chihuahua.

Funding:  $1,033,806 pesos from INE.

Partners:  INE.

Description: The Emerging Program consists of the following activities:
14
October 1996

-------
                                                Natural Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

a) Protection of resources that includes traversing the area, prevention and control of forest fires, and
community participation in the protection of species and resources.

b) Basic administration and operation: contracting personnel for the administration of financial,
human, and material resources; operation; and enforcement indicators for the Emerging Program.

c) Zoning and dissemination consists in the location, manufacturing, and placement of placards and
signs in the Reserve; design and circulate a brochure with basic information of the protected area.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•      Design and conduct training courses and workshops regarding protected area management,
       protected area planning, environmental education, legislation, and new conservation methods
       along the border.
•      Establish an organizational structure and joint inspection committees for protected areas.
•      Encourage the conservation and sustainable use of forest, rangeland,  soil and wildlife
       resources as a fundamental part of ecosystem management through collaboration with local
       communities and public participation.
•      Continue  to build and expand  links  between investigation and management of forest,
       rangeland and soils. Encourage training, education and research to identify and address forest
       and soil resource problems. Identify and solve resource and soil problems, support capacity
       building, education and research.
•      Promote sustainable management of natural resources in the entire border  zone through
       productive projects to improve the quality of life for local communities.
•      Support  the adoption of ecosystem management principles that further  sustainable
       development in local communities.
•      Manage natural protected areas to guarantee the conservation of ecosystems and biodiversity.
•      Facilitate participation from state and municipal authorities, Indian nations, nongovernmental
       organizations, universities and local communities in all aspects of conservation activities.

Contact: Celia Pigueron, UCANP-INE, (5)624-36-06; fax (5)624-35-89.
Project: Base Study for the Establishment of a Natural Protected Area in Laguna Madre. Tamaulipas

Purpose: Analyze the physical, biological, and social setting for the Laguna Madre, Tamaulipas
region to determine if it would support a designation of a natural protected area. Determine the area
and category of protection.

Funding: $ 116,000 pesos from INE.

Partners: INE-DUMAC.

Description: Integrate in one document the basic information with the zone characterization and the
analysis of the physical, biological, and socioeconomic aspects of the area of study.  Define the area
proposed for protection and the values and overriding issues of the zone that justify designation.
October 1996
                                                                                        15

-------
 Natural Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

 Relevant Border XXI Objective:
 •      Improve and expand the protection of species and habitats in the border zone.
 •      Promote the protection, conservation, and utilization of a biodiversity program in the border
        region, and the establishment of controlled production  units as  strategies for  restoring
        threatened and endangered flora and fauna.
 •      Promote research and investigations of habitats and species of flora and fauna, to initiate
        management and protection programs that concentrate on biodiversity and the sustainable use
        of resources.

 Contact: Celia Pigueron, UCANP-INE, (5)624-36-06; fax (5)624-35-89.
 Project: Implementation of Capacity Courses and Meetings on Experiences in the Administration
         and Operation of Natural Protected Areas in the Northern Border

 Purpose: Create capacity courses and public participation workshops that allow the personnel of the
 natural protected areas and the communities an adequate management and use of natural resources,
 in order to attain sustainable development.

 Funding:  $520,000 pesos from INE.

 Partners:  INE and other yet to be identified institutions.

 Description:   Implementation of public participation  workshops, as well as courses on the
 management and operation, in the Natural Protected Areas of the Northern Border.

 Relevant Border XXI Obj ective:
 •      Design and conduct training courses and workshops regarding protected area management,
       protected area planning, exchange of relevant experiences among  personnel from both
       countries, environmental education,  legislation, and new conservation methods along the
       border.

 Contact: Celia Pigueron, UCANP-INE, (5)624-36-06; fax (5)624-35-89.
Project: Flora and Fauna Inventory for Laguna Madre. Tamaulipas

Purpose:  Create an inventory of the flora and fauna species of the northern estuary system of
Laguna Madre.

Funding:  $64,800 pesos from INE.

Partners:  INE-Ocean Sciences Institute of UNAM.

Description: Review recent bibliographical information and scientific literature, in addition, field
trips will be integrated in the inventory for Laguna Madre.
                                                                              October 1996

-------
                                               Natural Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Relevant Border XXI Objective:
•      Promote research and investigations of habitats and species of. flora and fauna, to initiate
       management and protection programs that concentrate on biodiversity and the sustainable use
       of resources.

Contact: Celia Pigueron, UCANP-INE, (5)624-36-06; fax (5)624-35-89.
Project: Biologic Diversity of the Meadows of the Northeast of Mexico

Purpose:  Create a biologic inventory of the terrestrial vertebrates and flora of the meadows of the
northeast of Mexico, in the state of Chihuahua.

Funding: $67,056 pesos from INE.

Partners: INE-Ecology Center.

Description:  Compile bibliographical information in scientific literature of vertebrates and flora of
the region, in addition, conduct field trips to confirm the collected information.

Relevant Border XXI Objective:
•      Cooperate in the development of mutually accessible information systems, identifying status,
       trends, and research priorities of shared biological resources.
•      Promote research and investigations of habitats and species of flora and fauna, to initiate
       management and protection programs that concentrate on biodiversity and the sustainable use
       of resources.

Contact:  Celia Pigueron, UCANP-INE, (5)624-36-06; fax (5)624-35-89.
Project: Mammals of Baja California

Purpose: Create an inventory on the terrestrial mammals of Baja California.                 :

Funding: $32,580 pesos from INE.

Partners: INE, Biological Institute, UNAM.

Description:  Integrate the inventory of terrestrial mammals of Baja California through bibliographic
research and review of scientific literature.

Relevant Border XXI Objective:
•      Promote research and investigations of habitats and species of flora and fauna, to initiate
       management and protection programs that concentrate on biodiversity and the sustainable use
       of resources.

Contact: Celia Pigueron, UCANP-INE, (5)624-3 6-06; fax (5)624-3 5-89.
October 1996
                                                                                       17

-------
Natural Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan


Project: Review of the Current Situation of Floral Estuary Habitats in the Border Zone of the State
         ofSonora

Purpose: Obtain current information on the floral estuary habitats in the border zone of the state of
Sonora.

Funding:  $54,096 pesos from INE.

Partners:  INE, Scientific Research and Technology Center of the University of Sonora.

Description:  Review of the bibliography and plant collections.

Relevant Border XXI Objective:
•      Promote research and investigations of habitats and species of flora and fauna, to initiate
       management and protection programs that concentrate on biodiversity and the sustainable use
       of resources.

Contact: CeliaPigueron, UCANP-INE, (5)624-36-06; fax (5)624-35-89.


Project: Species with Special Protected Status

Purpose: Implement various studies of species with protected status in the northern border, with the
objective of integrating a current database of the ecological conditions for aquatic and terrestrial flora
and fauna.

Funding:  $982,000 pesos from INE.

Partners:  INE and different academic institutions and/or NGOs.

Description:  Integrate a database with the information of each of the contracted studies.

Relevant Border XXI Objective:
•      Cooperate in the development of mutually accessible information systems, identifying status,
       trends, and research priorities of shared biological resources.
•      Promote research and investigations of habitats and species of flora and fauna, to initiate
       management and protection programs that concentrate on biodiversity and the sustainable use
       of resources.

Contact: Celia Pigueron, UCANP-INE, (5)624-36-06; fax (5)624-35-89.
Project: Rehabilitation of Saline Soils

Purpose: Restore the productive properties of land that has been affected by poor management
practices.
18
October 1996

-------
                                                Natural Resources Workgroup 1996'Implementation Plan

Funding: To be determined.

Partners: SEMARNAP de Sonora and United States Forest Service (USFS).

Description:  The conversion of lands presently being used for livestock grazing by establishing
better range conditions through native revegetation in the brushy areas and foothills.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•      By using native species, encourage the conservation and sustainable use of forest, rangeland,
       soil,  and wildlife resources as  a fundamental part of ecosystem management  through
       collaboration with local communities and public participation.
•      Implement programs to restore and enhance soil and forest resources through projects to
       improve nursery management, silvicultural practices, and soil protection with emphasis  on
       native species.
•      Promote voluntary soil conservation programs and practices.

Contact: Diana Ponce, SRN-SEMARNAP, (5) 628-08-75; fax (5) 628-06-54.


Project: Rehabilitation ofJRefgrested and

Purpose: Reinitiate the operation of nurseries for reforesting in cities located in the border zone for
improving air quality.

Funding: To be determined.

Partners: SEMARNAP in Coahuila and the USFS.

Description: Produce 200,000 forest seedlings to plant 200 hectares of trees in urban and suburban
areas in borderland cities with emphasis in industrial areas.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•      Implement  programs to restore and enhance soil and forest resources through projects to
       improve nursery management, silvicultural practices, and soil protection with emphasis on
       native species.                      ,
•      Promote reforestation in urban areas with low water-consumptive plants as a method for
       improving air quality.           ,

Contact: Diana Ponce, SRN-SEMARNAP, (5) 628-08-75; fax (5) 628-06-54,
October 1996
19

-------
                            WATER WORKGROUP
                       1996 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
CONTACTS:
                    U.S.
 Cochair:
   William Hathaway
   Director, Water Quality Protection Division
   U.S. EPA - Region 6 (mail code 6WQ)
   First Interstate Bank Tower at Fountain Place
   1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200
   Dallas, TX 75202-2733
 Contacts:
   Oscar Cabra
   U.S. EPA - Region 6 (mail code 6WQ)
   First Interstate Bank Tower at Fountain Place
   1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200
   Dallas, TX 75202-2733
   phone:       (214)665-2718

   Doug Eberhardt (EPA Region 9)
   phone:       (415)744-1280
   e-mail:       eberhardt.doug@epamail.epa.gov
                  Mexico
Cochair:
  Ing. Pr6spero Ortega
  Subdirector General de Construcci6n
  CNA
  Insurgentes Sur No. 2140,1 er piso
  Colonia Ermita, San Angel
  Mexico City, DF CP01070
  phone:      (525) 661 -6060 & 237-4074
  fax:         (525)237-4132

Contact:
  Ing. Jaime Tinoco Rubi
  Coordinador de Asuntos Fronterizos
  CNA
  Insurgentes Sur 1806
  Mezzanine
  Col. Florida
  Mexico, DF CP  01030
  phone:      (525) 229-8650, -8651, or -8652
  fax:         (525) 229-8353
OVERVIEW:

The Water Workgroup has two primary objectives:

•      Develop  relationships and  establish  mechanisms which encourage ongoing binational
       communication and information exchange to increase effectiveness of project planning and
       implementation; and

•      Act on the binational priorities for environmental infrastructure development, pollution
       prevention and watershed planning, water quality monitoring, environmental training, and
       public education and involvement.

Environmental Infrastructure Development

•      Rio Grande Cities Facilities Planning - The U.S. has made available financial support (US
       $10 million) to Mexico, through the IBWC, to develop plans, studies and projects for
       wastewater treatment facilities in communities along the Rio Grande. EPA will continue to
       work with the IBWC to facilitate the development of these projects.

       The U.S. and Mexico, recognizing the importance of the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo to sustainable
       development, will work together  on a watershed-based analysis of drinking water and
       wastewater infrastructure needs for the cities, towns and communities near the river.
20
                                                                              October 1996

-------
Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

•      EPA-IBWC Sanitation and Water Quality Projects in Mexicali and Nogales -- The U. S.
       has offered financial support ($36 million) to Mexico and the city of Nogales, Arizona and
       will work toward developing sustainable projects.  Some projects are underway to address
       problems with existing local systems and longer term facilities plans are also being developed.

•      Existing Projects at Tijuana -- The U.S. will work with Mexico to develop an operation
       and maintenance plan for the international wastewater treatment plant and a plan for disposal
       of the international plant sludge.

       The  U.S. will work with Mexico to select the most appropriate alternative for handling
       wastewaters pending the construction of the ocean outfall.

       The U.S. will complete construction of the advanced primary treatment facilities.

       In addition to activities being performed by the Mexican border states and municipalities,
       CNA will assign resources to  partially finance work for 37.3 million dollars in 1996,
       according to the following (amounts in millions):
              Baja California (Tijuana, Mexicali, Tecate, and Ensenada)
              Sonora (Nogales)
              Tamaulipas (Nuevo Laredo, Reynosa, and Valle Hermoso)
                                                       TOTAL
20.0
 3.4
13.9
37.3
Pollution Prevention
•      Municipal Wastewater Monitoring at Nogales-Nogales, San Diego-Tijuana — The U.S.
       will  continue  to  work  with Mexico regarding  the  monitoring  program for municipal
       wastewaters in Nogales-Nogales and San Diego-Tijuana.

       In Mexico, CNA will provide guidance to the wastewater operating entities in the wastewater
       pretreatment program implementation. State authorities will be in charge of following up the
       pretreatment program.

Watershed Planning and Management

•      Rio  Grande  Alliance  ~ The U.S.  and the Texas Natural Resources  Conservation
       Commission will continue to share information with Mexico  regarding the creation of the Rio
       Grande Alliance and related projects. Similar collaboration will be encouraged along the rest
       of the border.

•      Colorado and Rio Grande Estuaries — The U.S. will continue to talk to Mexico regarding
       studies for the Colorado River and Rio Grande estuaries.  The U.S. proposes a basin-wide
       approach for the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo.

•      Ecosystems Issues ~ The U.S. and Mexico will continue to be engaged by different state and
       federal agencies regarding their ecosystem and watershed activities.
October 1996
                                                                                       21

-------
Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

•      Data Management — The U.S. will continue to work with Mexico in sharing various
       information and database systems.

       The U.S. will continue with actions leading to resolutions for sediment and salinity problems
       in the Colorado River.

Water Quality Monitoring

•      El Paso- Cd. Juarez Groundwater - The U.S.-Mexico technical subgroup will continue the
       process of data exchange and the development of regional hydrogeological studies.

•      Ambos Nogales Groundwater -- The U.S. will continue working with Mexico in the
       installation and sampling of groundwater monitoring wells in this area and in the development
       of regional hydrogeological studies.

•      Rio Grande-Colorado-New River Toxicity Studies ~ The second phase of the binational
       Rio Grande and the initial binational Colorado-New River surveys began in 1995. In 1996,
       the U.S. will continue to work with Mexico to complete the studies and begin analyzing the
       data and preparing the reports.

Training

In Mexico, CNA will continue with the training programs for the certification of wastewater plant
operators as well as for the operation and maintenance of drinking water and sewerage systems.

In addition, the U.S. will develop a training course concerning surface and groundwater sampling to
standardize the respective sampling methodologies.

Promoting Water Conservation - Development of a Water Culture

Mexico will continue to promote public outreach on the efficient and rational use of water.

Public Participation

Mexico will increase the creation of public forum committees at state and local levels to involve the
public on the decision-making process in hydraulic infrastructure projects.
PROJECTS:

Project: Nogales Potable Water and Wastewater

Purpose:  The project consists of a potable water component and a wastewater component. The
purpose of the Integral Project for the Use of Potable Water, Treatment, and Recharge in Nogales,
Sonora, (first stage) is to improve the services and infrastructure of the city to optimize the use of
water, the objective is the sustainable development of the Nogales, Sonora, water supply to make the
most efficient use of water in accordance with all of the services that COAPAES provides. The
 22
                                                                              October 1996

-------
 Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

 purpose of the wastewater component is to provide adequate wastewater treatment for the ambos
 Nogales area to protect public health and the environment.  Objectives include providing more
 treatment capacity for Nogales, Sonora, and implementing an effective pretreatment program.

 Funding: For the potable water project, the funding is to be determined using a combination of
 funds from COAPAES-Nogales, state of Sonora and NADBank loans. The government of Mexico
 is analyzing the possibility of assisting with federal resources. For the wastewater component, EPA
 has $36,058,414 available for this and other border wastewater projects in Arizona and California.
 For this project, EPA has provided funds to (a) IBWC (U.S. and Mexican Sections) for contractor
 support and project  coordination; (b) Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to
 provide technical assistance on the project; and (c) city of Nogales for an infiltration/inflow study and
 improvements. Additional U.S. funding for this project could come from EPA or BECC/NADBank
 funds in future years.  In addition, EPA has provided IBWC U.S. Section $200,000 for development
 of a pretreatment program.

 Partners: For the potable water project, the partners are CNA, COAPAES-Nogales, and the state
 of Sonora.  For the wastewater component, the primary U.S. partners are EPA, IBWC U.S. Section,
 ADEQ, Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR), Santa Cruz County and city of Nogales,
 Arizona; the primary Mexican partners are IBWC Mexican Section,  CNA, SIUE, and city of Nogales,
 Sonora.

 Description: The potable water project has been conditionally certified by BECC. Thus, CNA will
 support COAPAES with a comprehensive study that will allow the project to satisfy the remaining
 requirements for complete certification, such as analyzing the priority elements to be realized.  In this
 first stage, only drinking water elements have been included. In future stages, wastewater elements
 will be added, based on a facility planning effort.

 Regarding wastewater, the ambos Nogales area is currently served by the Nogales International
 Wastewater Treatment Plant (IWTP).  However, deficiencies in the system result in raw sewage
 flowing across the border in the Nogales Wash and in adjacent washes. Also, Nogales, Sonora, is
 utilizing its full capacity at the IWTP and additional capacity is needed.  The project involves
 planning, design, and construction of wastewater collection,  conveyance, and treatment facilities.
 This year we will continue or initiate the following activities.

 Wastewater Facility Planning: U.S. and Mexico have agreed to jointly study the wastewater needs
 and issues of ambos Nogales and identify possible solutions to provide additional treatment capacity.
 The  facility study  will analyze the  environmental, technical, and  financial aspects of different
 wastewater alternatives, closely coordinated with planning aspects  of the potable water project.
 Architectural and engineering consultants have been hired to prepare the study and facilitate public
information activities. The study will begin this winter and will conclude with a facility plan and
 design for a proposed project that may be presented for BECC certification.

 Wastewater Immediate-need Projects: Reduction of extraneous flows in the wastewater collection
 systems of Nogales, Arizona and Nogales, Sonora is urgently needed. In Arizona, an intensive study
to identify sources of infiltration and inflow (I/I) and limited rehabilitation of the collection system
has been completed. Similarly, an I/I study for Sonora may be conducted this year. The  findings of
October 1996
                                                                                      23

-------
Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

the studies will become the basis for a program of I/I improvements for each collection and
conveyance system.
                      b

WastewaterPretreatmentProgram: IBWC U.S. Section has procured a consultant to calculate the
maximum levels of toxic pollutants that can safely be treated at the IWTP (headworks analysis).
IBWC will then allocate the allowable amounts to the two countries, which will regulate users of the
system to ensure compliance.  The  headworks analysis will take approximately  10 months to
complete, starting in 1996.
Relevant Border  XXI Objectives:
participation.
Develop  infrastructure,  pollution prevention,  public
Contacts: Evelyn Wachtel, EPA Region 9, (415) 744-1167
          Armando Roam, USIBWC, (915) 534-6605
          Mario Castaneda, ADEQ, (602) 207-4409
          HughHolub, City ofNogales, Arizona, (602) 287-6571
          Miguel Angel Jurado, CNA, 62 13 03 47
          Silverio Luis Aguilar, COAAPAES Nogales, 63 12 31 02
Project: Nogales Groundwater Monitoring

Purpose: The purpose is to determine the extent and possible origin of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) in the transboundary aquifer under Nogales Wash in ambos Nogales, which could pose a
public health threat. Objectives include the construction of monitoring wells and implementation of
a quarterly monitoring program to quantify levels of VOCs and inorganics, assist in groundwater
contaminant source identification and control, and establish a baseline for VOCs and inorganics in
the transboundary aquifer.

Funding: EPA has provided $200,000 to IBWC U.S. Section and $65,000 to Arizona Department
of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to implement this project.  EPA is also funding two positions at
ADEQ in part to provide technical support on this project.

Partners: ADEQ will be the lead for the U.S. and IBWC U.S. Section will also be a primary partner.
Mexican partners include IBWC Mexican Section, CNA and  state of Sonora.

Description: Past studies of groundwater quality in the Nogales, Arizona, area have indicated the
presence of VOCs and trihalomethanes in the transboundary aquifer under the Nogales Wash.  The
problem seems to be on both sides of the border, but the problem has not been satisfactorily studied
on a binational level.

The project consists of the construction  and monitoring of wells on each side of the border.  The
wells on the U.S. side have been drilled and  developed. Well construction equipment has been
purchased and transferred to Mexico for their use.  Drilling of wells in Mexico still needs to be
scheduled.  After all the wells are constructed, samples will be taken by a binational team and
analyzed on a quarterly basis for a period of one year. Sampling in the U.S. was initiated in July
1996. All samples will be split for separate analysis by the U.S.  and Mexico.  IBWC arranged OSHA
24
                                                                              October 1996

-------
 Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

 training in April 1996 for the Mexican members of the sampling team; the training was necessary for
 their participation in the sampling activities in the U.S.

 Relevant Border XXI Objective: Water quality monitoring.

 Contacts: Evelyn Wachtel, EPA Region 9, (415) 744-1167
           Sylvia Waggoner, USfflWC, (915) 534-6704
           Mario Castaneda, ADEQ, (602) 207-4409
           Miguel Angel Jurado, CNA, 62  13 03 47
           Silverio Luis Aguilar, COAAPAES Nqgales, 63 12 31 02
 Project: Nogales Wellhead Projection

 Purpose: The purpose is to employ wellhead protection strategies in a proactive effort to protect
 the quality of the groundwater in the transboundary aquifer under the ambos Nogales-Santa Cruz
 River area.  Objectives include enhancement of local voluntary involvement in the management of
 groundwater quality, education of the public on groundwater quality, and measurement of direct
 environmental and human health benefits for wellhead protection.

 Funding:  EPA is  providing $195,078 to the Southeastern Arizona Governments Organization
 (SEAGO) to implement the project,  including funding an EPA staff person on loan to SEAGO. EPA
 is also funding a position at ADEQ in part to provide technical support on this project.

 Partners:  Primary  U.S. partners include SEAGO, ADEQ, Santa Cruz County, ADWR, ADHS,
 IBWC private industry, community groups, and city of Nogales, Arizona. Discussions on extending
 the effort into Mexico would involve the IB WC.

 Description:  This  project is intended to protect the region's groundwater before it becomes
 contaminated.  The project focuses on the apparent, but often ignored, link between activities that
 take place on the land near aquifer recharge areas around groundwater wells and the quality of
 ground water supplied by those wells. General elements of the project include defining the land area
 to be protected, identifying and locating potential sources of contamination, managing the protection
 area, and planning accordingly.

 Three wellhead protection areas have been identified: Potrero Creek, Santa Cruz, and Valle Verde.
Potential sources of contamination have been mapped in each area.  Resolution of how to deal with
 one known contaminant plume is  nearing completion.  Existing protection measures have been
 evaluated, and an implementation plan for additional protection measures is being developed. A safe
 drinking water bilingual curriculum for use in kindergarten through twelfth grade is nearing
completion, and three bilingual public information pamphlets are being developed. EPA is planning
to award a grant for $40,000 to Nogales, Arizona, for implementation of the management strategies.
October 1996
                                                                                     25

-------
Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Relevant Border XXI Objective: Pollution prevention.

Contacts: Evelyn Wachtel, EPA Region 9, (415) 744-1167
          Mario Castafieda, ADEQ, (602) 207-4409
          Michele Kimpel, SEAGO, (602) 432-5301.


Project: Lower Colorado-New River Toxics Survey

Purpose: The purpose is to determine the levels of toxic pollutants in the lower Colorado River and
in the New River. Mexico has requested monitoring of the lower Colorado River due to concern
about the quality of the water supply for Mexicali and Tijuana. Interest in New River monitoring was
elevated when Imperial County and a coalition of environmental justice groups filed petitions under
the Toxic Substances Control Act.

Funding:  EPA has provided a total of $361,000 for this project:  $240,000 to the United States
Geological Survey (USGS) to monitor for toxic pollutants in water and sediments; $72,000 to the
University of California at Davis (UCD) to measure aquatic toxicity and assist in data compilation;
and $49,000 to California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) for analysis of bioaccumulation in
fish tissue.

Partners:  Primary U.S. partners include EPA, USGS, UCD, DFG, state of Arizona, and ffiWC
U.S. Section. Mexican partners include IBWC Mexican Section and CNA.

Description:  Abinational program for monitoring toxic pollutants in the Colorado and New Rivers
has been developed. Three sites on each river were monitored during the first round. Five sites were
monitored on the Colorado River during the second round.  The second round of sampling on the
New River has also been completed. Now, work is beginning  on the preparation of a binational
report describing the results of both rounds of sampling.

Relevant Border XXI Objective: Water quality monitoring.

Contacts: Ed Liu, EPA Region 9, (415) 744-1934
          Roy Schroeder, USGS, (619) 637-6824
          Dr. Francisco Oyarbazal, CNA, 65 52 86 82
           Carlos Pena, IBWC (915) 534-6704
 Project: Lower Colorado-New River Data Synthesis

 Purpose: The purpose is to develop a better understanding of the water quality of the Colorado and
 New Rivers by compiling and synthesizing existing data.

 Funding:  EPA has provided $182,000 to the University of California at Davis (UCD) for this
 project.

 Partners:  UCD.

                                                                             October 1996

-------
 Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

 Description: UCD is compiling existing data on the lower Colorado River and on the New River
 and performing a series of reviews to synthesize the data and make it more understandable to the
 public.  UCD will prepare copies of their reviews in both English and Spanish. UCD is also preparing
 a database of the existing data.  The database will also be used for the data collected as part of the
 Binational Colorado River-New River Toxics Survey project.

 UCD is gathering the data and preparing the reviews and the database.

 Relevant Border XXI Objectives:  Water quality monitoring, public participation.

 Contacts: Ed Liu, EPA Region 9, (415) 744-1934
           Jim Quinn, UCD, (916) 752-8027.                           .
 Project: New River Toxics Model

 Purpose: The purpose is to understand the fate of toxic organic pollutants in the New River.

 Funding: EPA has provided $70,000 to the University of California at Davis (UCD) for this project.

 Partners: EPA and UCD.

 Description: UCD has collected samples along the length of the New River and is using the results
 to develop a model which will predict the behavior of toxic organic pollutants in river sediments and
 water.

 Relevant Border XXI Objective: Water quality monitoring.

 Contacts: Ed Liu, EPA Region 9, (415) 744-1934.


 Project: Mexicali Wastewater

 Purpose: The purpose is to provide adequate wastewater treatment for the city of Mexicali, Baja
 California, and thereby improve the quality of the New River. Objectives include improvement of the
 existing wastewater treatment system (Mexicali I), development of a second system (Mexicali II), and
 implementation of an effective pretreatment program. Control of industrial and domestic wastewater
 will result in considerable  improvement in the quality of the New River where  it  crosses the
 international boundary, reducing a serious existing public health threat.

 Funding: EPA has $36,058,414 available for this and pther border wastewater projects in Arizona
 and California.  For this project, EPA has provided funds to (a) IBWC (U.S. and Mexican^Sections)
 for contractor support and project coordination; and  (b) the state of California (State Water
Resources Control Board [SWRCB] and Regional Water Quality Control Board, Colorado River
Basin Region [RWQCB 7]) for technical assistance and water quality monitoring.  Additional U.S.
funding for this project could come from EPA or BECC/NADBank in future years. Mexico is
October 1996
                                                                                      27

-------
Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

currently studying the possibility of providing resources for improvements to the various components
of sanitation in Mexicali.

Partners: Primary U.S. partners are EPA, IBWC U.S. Section, SWRCB, RWQCB 7, and Imperial
Irrigation District. Primary Mexican partners are IBWC Mexican Section, CNA, and state of Baja
California Norte.

Description:  Deficiencies in the existing Mexicali wastewater system result in the discharge of
considerable amounts of untreated or partially treated domestic and industrial wastewater to the New
River, and the Alamo River is also threatened.  In November 1995, a binational agreement was signed
committing both governments to the preparation of a binational facility plan which will analyze the
technical, financial, and environmental aspects of the project alternatives available. The facility plan
will examine options for the long-term  solution to the wastewater problem.   Eleven short-term
projects, which are relatively inexpensive and certain to be part of the overall solution (quick fixes),
were also identified and construction of those projects has begun. IBWC has awarded a contract for
engineering services to assist in development of the facility plan and implementation of the quick
fixes. RWQCB 7 is monitoring the New River for conventional pollutants and  metals to document
improvements in water quality associated with the project.  Monitoring of the New River will help
document progress resulting from implementation of the Mexicali wastewater project.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives: Develop infrastructure, water quality monitoring, pollution
prevention.

Contacts: Doug Eberhardt, EPA Region 9, (415) 744-1280
           Glenn Hansel, USIBWC, (915) 534-6605
           Bart Christensen, SWRCB, (916) 227-4426
           Ron Rodriguez, RWQCB 7, (619) 776-8944
           Dr. Francisco Oyarbazal, CNA, 65 52 86 82
           Gaston Loustanau, CESPM,  65 57 15 50
 Project:  Tijuana Wastewater

 Purpose: The purpose is to provide adequate wastewater treatment for the Tijuana, Baja California,
 area, to reduce a serious existing threat to public health and the environment.  Objectives include
 construction of the South Bay International Wastewater Treatment Plant (IWTP), land outfall, and
 ocean outfall and implementation of an effective pretreatment program.

 Funding: EPAhas received $239,400,000 for planning, design, and construction of the IWTP and
 outfall facilities.  The city of San Diego will pay a pro rata share (40% for the ocean outfall) for its
 use of the outfall facilities. The state of California has contributed $5,300,000 for the outfall facilities.
 Mexico will contribute funds to the IWTP in the amount it would have spent to construct its own
 plant  in Mexico.  Current  estimates indicate that sufficient funds  are available to  construct the
 advanced primary treatment plant, ocean outfall, and canyon collectors, but funding is not sufficient
 for construction  of the secondary treatment facilities as currently designed.
 28
                                                                                October 1996

-------
 Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

 Partners: Primary U.S. partners include IBWC, state of California (SWRCB), and city of San
 Diego. Mexico is participating through IBWC.

 Description:  Raw sewage from Tijuana contaminates the Tijuana River and results in adverse
 impacts to the Tijuana River National Estuarine Research Reserve and quarantine of U.S. beaches.
 IBWC Minute No. 283 calls for the construction of the IWTP and outfall facilities to supplement
 Tijuana's existing treatment plant.  This construction, in conjunction with improvements in Tijuana's
 collection system, will eliminate the dry-weather contamination of the river. Three types of structures
 will be constructed: canyon collectors (to convey renegade sewage flows from canyons which drain
 to the U.S. to the IWTP), the IWTP, and the outfall pipelines. Minute No. 283 also calls for Mexico
 to  develop and implement an effective pretreatment program.   The city of San Diego has been
 working with the city of Tijuana on program development.

 The primary treatment phase of the IWTP is under construction. The secondary treatment facilities
 (activated sludge) and canyon collectors have been designed. The South Bay Land Outfall has been
 constructed and construction of the ocean outfall has begun.   Wastewater samples have been
 collected at three locations in the Tijuana collection system. Supplemental environmental reviews are
 underway to (1) examine options for operating the advanced primary IWTP pending completion of
 the ocean outfall and secondary treatment facilities and  (2) examine potentially less expensive
 alternatives to activated sludge for providing secondary treatment.

 Construction of the advanced primary treatment plant and ocean outfall will be completed in February
 1997 and May 1988, respectively.  Design of the activated sludge secondary treatment facilities and
 canyon collectors was completed in  March  1996.  A draft supplemental environmental review
 regarding interim treatment options was released in the summer of 1996, and a draft of the analysis
 of alternative secondary treatment technologies will be released in 1997.
Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
prevention, water quality monitoring.
Develop  infrastructure,  public  participation,  pollution
Contacts: Nancy Woo, EPA Region 9, (415) 744-1164
          Bill Ruth, USIBWC, (915) 534-6676
          Bart Christensen, SWRCB, (916) 227-4426
          Ann Sasaki, City of San Diego, (619) 533-4211
          Dr. Francisco Oyarbazal, CNA, 65 52 86 82
          Ismael Geijalba,'CESPT, 65 52 86 82 or 66 22 40 62
Project: Texas Colonias Plumbing Loan Program

Purpose: To improve public health for the colonia residents by providing safe and sanitary drinking
water and wastewater service.

Funding:  On September 27,  1991, EPA awarded a $15,000,000 grant to the Texas Water
Development Board (TWDB).

Partners: EPA Region 6 and the TWDB.
October 1996
                                                                                      29

-------
Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Description: Loans are made between the TWDB and a local government. Loans to low income
residents are made available and administered at the local level for residential plumbing improvements
to improve public health for the colonia residents in designated border counties. Loans have been
made to the cities of Pharr and Edinburg and El Paso County.

Relevant Border XXI Objective: Develop infrastructure.

Contacts: Federal: Oscar Cabra Jr., EPA, (214) 665-2718
           State: Fernando Escarcega, TWDB, (512) 475-2068.
Project: New Mexico Colonias Wastewater Construction Grants Program CCWCGP)

Purpose: To provide financial assistance for the purpose of planning, designing and constructing
adequate wastewater systems to serve unincorporated colonias as expeditiously as possible, consistent
with implementation of the Integrated Border Environmental Plan (IBEP) for the U.S.-Mexico border
in New Mexico; to improve public health for the colonia residents. To maintain the fiscal integrity
oftheCWCGP.

Funding:  In accordance with the 1993 and 1995 Fiscal Year Appropriation Acts, $20 million of
federal funds were awarded for the CWCGP ($10 million for each appropriation year).

Partners:  The region's primary contact is the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED)
Construction Programs Bureau.

Description:  The FY93 and FY95 Appropriations Act for the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) programs authorized funds for grants to New Mexico for the purpose of providing wastewater
treatment facilities to colonias.

Provide funds to the NMED for the establishment of a CWCGP.  Federal dollars from the CWCGP
fund shall be used solely to make grants to construct eligible wastewater treatment improvements
which address the existing wastewater needs of the unincorporated colonias in existence before
November 28, 1990.

To date, the colonias program has funded 13 facility plans for 18 communities.  Of the 13 facility
plans, four have been finalized and received a finding of no significant impact (FONSI).  Three of the
four, Mesquite, Hatch, and Anthony, are under construction; the fourth, Dona Ana Village,  is under
design. Of the remaining nine colonias, five are fundable for construction and four are not.  San
Miguel-La Mesa, Vado-Del Cerro, Berino, Rincon and North Hurley are fundable for construction
once outstanding issues are resolved. Chamberino, La Union, Salem-Ogaz and San Pablo cannot be
funded for construction because they do not currently have a community water system, which is a
requirement for EPA's federal construction funding.

Relevant Border XXI Objective: Develop infrastructure.

Contacts: Oscar Cabra Jr., EPA, (214) 665-2718
          Pat Olaechea, NMED, (505) 827-2812.
so
                                                                              October 1996

-------
Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan
Project: Constructed Wetlands Wastewater Treatment Model Project to Address Wastewater
        Treatment in the Colonias

Purpose:  This project will demonstrate the constructed wetlands type of wastewater treatment
technology in a colonia as provided for in the FY93 Appropriations Act.

Funding:  On December 22,1992, a $650,000 grant was awarded to the New Mexico Environment
Department (NMED).

Partners:  Mesquite Mutual Domestic Water Consumers and Mutual Sewerage Works Association,
New Mexico Environment Department, EPA.                                  ;

Description:  The NMED administers the planning, design and construction of this project. EPA
provides the performance standards to be achieved by the treatment facility, technical consultation
during design, and assists NMED in oversight during construction. EPA also provides technical
consultation to NMED during the design of the monitoring program and oversight during monitoring.
Construction is underway.

Relevant Border XXI Objective:  Develop infrastructure.

Contacts: Federal: Oscar Cabra, Jr., EPA, (214) 665-2718
          State: Patrick Oleachea, NMED,  (505) 827-2812.
Project: Environmental Partnership Effort along the U.S.-Mexico Border: Ciudad luajrezjBl Paso
        Wellhead Protection-Groundwater Pilot Project

Purpose: The purpose of this project is to implement the state of Texas' Wellhead Protection (WHP)
Program in all communities along the U.S. border with Mexico.  The project will also provide
technical assistance to Ciudad Juarez's Junta Municipal de Agua y Saneamiento as they develop a
WHP program for the 200+ water wells in Ciudad Juarez.  The project will result in an added level
of protection for the drinking water supply wells along the U.S. side of the border and will set a
standard which future Mexican groundwater protection efforts may use as a model.

Funding:  In September 1993, EPA awarded assistance funds to the Texas Natural Resource and
Conservation Commission (TNRCC) in the amount of $150,000.

Partners:   Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission,  Junta Municipal de Agua y
Saneamiento de Ciudad Juarez, Comision. Nacional del Agua, Comision Internacional de Limites y
Aguas, EPA Region 6, U.S. Section, International Boundary and Water Commission, the University
of Texas at El Paso, and the Retired and Senior Volunteer Program.

Description:  The TNRCC is responsible for implementing the state's approved WHP program. This
project funded the implementation of the state's program in all U.S. communities along the Texas-
October 1996
31

-------
Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Mexico border that rely on groundwater as a source of drinking water; The Commission was also
funded to provide technical assistance and programmatic guidance to Ciudad Juarez to aid in the
development of a groundwater protection program for that city's 200+ public water supply wells. The
TNRCC also assists in providing technical assistance to 20 university students and 10 senior citizen
mentors in the EPA AmeriCorps groundwater protection project.

The project has been completed with 12 communities along the Texas-Mexico border currently
participating in the state's WHP program. On February 3,1995, Ciudad Juarez held an official launch
of its WHP program and the inventory efforts are underway. Mexico's inventory of potential sources
of contamination is being placed into an international database.

Relevant Border XXI Objective:  Pollution prevention.

Contacts: Federal: Ken Williams, EPA, (214) 665-7129
          State: Brad Cross, TNRCC,  (512) 239-4753
          Manuel Jesus Diaz, CNA, 14 13 98 94
          Jose Mateos, JMAS, Ciudad Juarez, 16 11 54 22                    :
Project: Texas Colonia Wastewater Treatment Assistance Program

Purpose: To expedite the construction of eligible wastewater treatment improvements which
address  the existing  wastewater needs of  the  unincorporated colonias in existence as  of
November 9, 1989.

Funding:  On December 22, 1992, EPA awarded a $50,000,000 grant to the Texas Water
Development Board (TWDB).  On January 22, 1995, EPA awarded a second grant in the amount
of $ 100,000,000.  During FY 1996, EPA anticipates an award of $50,000,000.

Partners:  The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) provides a 100% match to the FY
1993/96 EPA funds and a 20% match to the FY 1995 funds. Various local water and wastewater
service providers participate in the colonia projects.

Description:  The TWDB administers this program and provides grants to local governments and
nonprofit water supply corporations for design and construction of wastewater collection and
treatment facilities in the colonias. The TWDB  has set aside $2 million for regional facility
planning studies to  address areas where a regional solution is possible. The TWDB has set aside
$2 million for rural planning to provide direct technical support and financial assistance for facility
planning in areas not well suited to a regional or subregional solution.

TWDB has awarded grants totaling over $90 million  for design/construction and rural/urban
planning. Three projects have completed construction, four projects are under construction, and
13 projects are in the design phase. The TWDB has regional facility planning studies underway
in Cameron  County and in Hidalgo County. The TWDB has rural facility planning studies
underway in Cameron, Hidalgo, Webb and El Paso Counties.
Relevant Border XXI Objective: Develop infrastructure.
32
                                                                             October 1996

-------
Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Contacts: Federal-Oscar Cabra Jr., EPA, (214) 665-2718
          State:"Fernando Escarcega, TWDB, (512) 475-2068.
Project: Characterization of Transboundary Aquifers in the ElPaso-Ciudad Juarez-Las Cruces
         Region of the U.S.-Mexico Border

Purpose: This study is a joint effort by the governments of the U.S. and Mexico and the states
of Texas and New Mexico. It is designed to identify the border region's transboundary aquifers,
quantify the natural and induced chemical quality of each aquifer, characterize and quantify the
available supply of each aquifer, determine the direction of groundwater flow and its relationship
to the flow of the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo, and develop Geographic Information System (GIS)
coverages of the region.  The New Mexico portion of the study will also include a Sunland Park,
New Mexico public water system investigation to determine the cause of and recommend solutions
to nematodes and other invasive organisms in the distribution system.

The study initially focused on  the El Paso-Juarez-Las Cruces area and in FY97 the project was
expanded to include the transboundary aquifers located in the Del Rio-Eagle Pass area of the U.S.-
Mexico border.

In response to recommendations by the Texas Water Development Board, FY97 funds will be used
to address two specific deficiencies in the Del Rio-Eagle Pass area: lack of water quality data
necessary to properly evaluate human health risks  and insufficient water  level information to
determine groundwater flow paths.

Funding: Funds in the amount of $200,000 are being used for water quality monitoring and the
gathering of additional water level data.   Region  6 is providing the additional funds  to the
cooperative agreement  with the  Texas Water Development Board for  use on this project
enhancement.

Partners:  EPA Region 6, Texas Water Development Board, New Mexico State University -
Water Resources Research Institute (New Mexico  area only),  and  Comisidn Internacional de
Limites y Aguas (CILA).

Description: The Texas Water  Development Board, in cooperation with the partners, will sample
selected water wells in the study area in order to evaluate two groups of analyses: toxic trace
metals that represent a human health hazard and tritium activity, carbon-14, and stable isotopes
of hydrogen, oxygen,  and inorganic carbon. These data will assist in tracing groundwater flow
paths and  determine  groundwater residence times.  This information is vital in evaluating
contaminant plume configuration, aquifer interaction with the Rio Grande-Rio  Bravo, and other
similar flow direction  characterizations.

Compilation and verification of well data have been  completed.  A hydrochemical-stiff diagram
map of the study region and development of broad categories of GIS coverages are near
completion.
October 1996
33

-------
Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

The El Paso-Juarez-Las Cruces portion of the project has been completed with a final draft report
to be released in August 1996. The Del Rio-Eagle Pass segment of the study will be completed
in March 1998.

Relevant Border XXI Objective:  Water quality monitoring.

Contacts: Ken Williams, EPA, (214) 665-7166
          John Ashworth, TWDB, (512) 936-0872
          Bobby Creel, NMSU-WRRI, (505) 646-4337
          Ruben Chavez, CNA, 56 63 22 17
Project:  Binational Wastewater Operators Training

Purpose:  To have the Water Environment Association of Texas (WEAT), formerly the Water
Environment Federation, conduct training for wastewater treatment plant operators along the
border in a binational forum and to provide Spanish translation of related EPA manuals.

Funding:  EPA initially provided $100,000 to WEAT to conduct the designated training in June
1995.  An additional $50,000 was provided in September 1995 for Spanish translation of EPA
manuals.

Partners: The partners in the project are EPA Region 6 and the WEAT.

Description: Wastewater plant operators will be trained in the importance of source protection
(surface and groundwater supplies), treatment techniques, and the importance of testing and
quality control, as well as methods to maintain the treatment plant and the collection system.
Additional tasks include Spanish translation of three EPA manuals.

The first 20-hour training course was held in Piedras Negra, Mexico in February 1996, with
attendance of over 70 professionals from both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border. The second
course is scheduled to be held in Monterrey, Mexico in October 1996.

The training portion of the grant will cover a five-year period for  a minimum of two training
sessions per year. The Spanish translation is scheduled for completion in September 1996.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:  Training and development.

U.S. Contacts: Federal: Terri Kelley, EPA, (214) 665-6797
               State: Rhonda Harris, WEAT, (214) 985-7147.
Project:  Binational Water Supply Operators Training

Purpose: To conduct training for water supply operators along the border to provide information
on the requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) in a binational forum.
34
                                                                            October 1996

-------
Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Funding: EPA awarded $100,000 to the American Water Works Association (AWWA) in July
1995.  An additional $100,000 is currently targeted to expand the scope of this project.

Partners: The partners in the project are EPA Region 6 and the.AWWA.

Description:  Drinking water operators will be trained in the importance of source protection
(sanitary survey for surface supplies or wellhead protection for groundwater supplies), treatment
techniques and the importance of testing and quality control, and methods to maintain the quality
of the finished water within the distribution system.

Initial training has been completed and plans are underway for the next session.  The intent is to
conduct a minimum of two training programs each year.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives: Training and development.

Contacts: Federal: Terri Kelley, EPA, (214) 665-6797
          State: Larry Webb, AWWA, (713) 338-4848.
Project: Circuit Rider Technical Assistance for Public Water Systems along the Texas-Mexico
         Border

Purpose: Funds from the Office of International Activities (OIA) were allocated to the Region 6
Office of the EPA to support U.S.-Mexico border initiatives. Funds were approved for a project
which would supplement the current "Circuit Rider" contract which exists between the Texas
Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) and the Texas Rural Water Association
(TRWA).  The fundamental objective was to improve the quality of water and wastewater utility
service to consumers throughout Texas, especially in rural areas.

Funding: The total cost of the two-year (FY95 - FY96) Circuit Rider Program for the Texas-
Mexico border region is $147,368.  Of this amount, $140,000 are  federal funds and $7,368 are
state funds.

Partners: The Utility Assistance Team of TNRCC's Water Utilities Division will administer this
contract with the TRWA. EPA's contacts will be with both the TNRCC and the TRWA.

Description: The "Circuit Rider Technical Assistance for Public Water Systems Along the Texas-
Mexico Border" provides for concentrated management and technical assistance to water utilities
in the region for two years.  This project calls for the contractor, the TRWA, to provide the
hands-on assistance with an experienced "circuit rider." Two objectives of the TNRCC are, by
1988: to  decrease  by  50%  the  number of public drinking water systems in  substantial
noncompliance with public drinking water systems standards; and to ensure that 100% of regulated
water and wastewater utilities provide reliable and adequate customer service in a cost-effective
manner.
October 1996
35

-------
Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Work began September 1, 1994, and is continuing. The program will be conducted over a two-
year period, ending August 31, 1996.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:  Training and development.

Contacts:   Federal: Joan E. Brown, EPA, (214) 665-7130
            State: George Freitag, TRWA, (512) 239-6103.
Project:  Toxics Studies of the Rio Grande

Purpose: The purpose of these studies is to screen the Rio Grande for the prevalence, magnitude,
and impact of toxic chemicals.

Funding:   EPA has provided  $1,106,000 to the Texas  Natural  Resource Conservation
Commission (TNRCC) to coordinate water quality studies with Mexico on the Rio Grande. In
FY92 the Office of Water and the Region provided $280,000. In FY93 the Office of International
Activities and the Region provided $201,000.  In FY94, FY95 and FY96, Regional Geographic
Initiative funds of $325,000, $200,000 and $100,000, respectively, were provided.

Partners: U.S.  and Texas agencies involved are EPA, TNRCC, the Texas Department of Health
and the International Boundary and Water Commission, U.S. Section.  Mexican agencies involved
are the National Water Commission of Mexico and the International Boundary and Water
Commission, Mexican Section.  These agencies were involved in work plan development,  data
collection, and data evaluation.

Description: The studies include'determinations of toxic pollutant concentrations in water,
sediment, and fish tissue; toxicity testing  of water and sediment using minnows and waterfleas;
and biological assessments of fish and macroinvertebrate communities that live in the river.  The
study area is from El Paso-Juarez to Brownsville-Matamoros. The Phase I binational report, which
has been  issued, has helped identify areas where water pollution control is needed.

Binational toxics sampling began in November 1992. A binational report was issued in September
1994.  In evaluating the Rio Grande, the U.S. and Mexico found that the river is not heavily
impacted by toxics.  Follow-up toxics sampling began in May  1995, with a second binational
report to be released in March 1997. There has been excellent cooperation among the Mexican
and U.S. scientists involved.

Relevant Border XXI Objective: Water quality monitoring.

Contacts:   Federal:  Forrest John, EPA, (214) 665-8368
            State:  Patrick Roques, TNRCC, (512) 239-4604
            Mexico:  Ignacio Castillo, CNA, 55 95 29 88
                                                                            October 1996

-------
Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Project: Rio Grande Alliance

Purpose: To establish community partnerships which will address identified environmental needs
in the Rio Grande Basin. The partnerships will create a community-based Rio Grande Alliance
(R.A.) for the protection and restoration of the river's watershed.

Funding:  In FY94 and FY95, EPA Region 6 provided a total of $525,000 to the Texas Natural
Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) for the project.

Partners:   Federal, tribal,  state and local governments and nongovernmental  organizations
(NGOs) active within the Rio Grande Basin.  TNRCC has completed an extensive outreach effort
to involve Mexican government officials at the federal and state level and representatives from
Colorado and New Mexico to ensure that the R.A. includes all Basin stakeholders.

Description: The R.A. has been formed to accomplish three primary goals:

•      Through the Alliance, agencies and decision-makers  in the Basin will have a forum in
       which they can coordinate their programs, thus eliminating redundant activities. This will
       promote efficient use of limited resources and assist  the agencies involved in targeting
       funds where they  are most needed.   This will be accomplished by a series of R.A.
       meetings that will be held in  the Basin,  and also through continuing communication
       mechanisms including a newsletter and Web site.

•      The  Alliance will  increase communication between  people  and entities  that may  not
       otherwise interact.  This will  expand the awareness of problems,  issues and possible
       solutions throughout the Basin.  To fulfill this task, TNRCC will maintain a stakeholder
       database, identify ongoing environmental programs, projects and studies in the Basin, and
       develop an information center to house information on Basin activities.

•      The  Alliance will focus on implementation and corrective activities.  The R.A. is  not
       another research project or another layer of government. The R.A. will help communities
       find  solutions to their environmental problems  by  acting as matchmaker  for Basin
       residents;  TNRCC will consolidate information on available resources and provide  the
       information to the communities faced with environmental problems.

TNRCC laid the groundwork for the R.A.  by meeting with over 40 different federal, state and
local agencies and NGOs in Mexico, Colorado, New Mexico and Texas. The first R.A. meeting
was held in El Paso,  Texas, July 15-16,  1996. The R.A. mission  statement, which was developed
at the kickoff meeting,  is as follows:

       The Rio Grande Alliance provides an international forum  to bring together diverse
       groups committed to the management, protection and conservation of natural
       resources and human health in the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo Basin.
October 1996
37

-------
Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

TNRCC is currently working with R.A. members to establish a steering committee for the R.A.,
and to develop three initial projects for the Alliance:  a transboundary Basin-wide evaluation, a
Basin-wide project inventory, and a riparian restoration project.

The Basin stakeholder database has been developed-and will be updated throughout the project.
The World Wide Web site detailing current events in the Basin, environmental infrastructure
projects, identified needs, and resources available will be completed in September, 1996.  A draft
matrix of funding solutions for identified needs will be completed by November, 1997.  The
information center, which will house information on Basin activities, and the final report for R. A.
activities will be completed by  September, 1998.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives: Watershed planning and management.

Contacts: Karen Young, EPA  Region 6, (214) 665-6679
          Susan Branning, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-8022
          Terri Buchanan, TNRCC, (512) 239-4620                    ,
          Sam Archer, TNRCC, (512)  239-6132
          Jose Luis Moltalvo,  CNA, 17 17 42 28
Project: Rio Grande Cities Facilities Planning

Purpose: Planning and design of wastewater facilities to control wastewater discharges from
Mexico into the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo.

Funding:  In accordance with the Appropriations Act of 1995, EPA awarded $10 million in
January 1995 to the International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC).

Partners: EPA's primary contact will be the U.S. Section of the IBWC; however, the Mexican
Section of the IBWC will participate as will the National Water Commission (CNA) in Mexico.

Description:  Monies from this I.G. are to be used to fund facilities'  planning of wastewater
treatment and collection facilities in Mexico and in border areas.  The plans will meet the criteria
developed by the Border Environmental Cooperation Commission.  Projects are currently being
funded for the communities of Reynosa, Acuna, Piedras Negras and Ojinaga.

The initial task will be the development of project proposals and work plans.  The A-E firms have
been selected for each project; the contracts have been awarded; the first task orders have been
approved for each of the  four projects; and the notices to proceed have been issued to the A-E
firms.

Relevant Border XXI Objective:  Develop infrastructure.

Contacts: Oscar Cabra, Jr., EPA Region 6, (214) 665-2718
          Terry Turner, EPA Region, (214) 665- 7182
          Armando Roam, IBWC, (915) 534-6700
38
                                                                            October 1996

-------
Water Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

          Jose Luis Moltalvo, CNA, 17 17 42 28
Project: Characterization of Transboundary Aquifers in the Del Rio to Eagle Pass Segment of the
         Rib Grande Region

Purpose:  This study is a continuation study of the transbdundary aquifers along the Texas-Mexico
border with particular emphasis to be placed on the "twin cities" of  Del Rio-Ciudad Acuna, Eagle
Pass-Piedras Negras, and Laredo-Nuevo Laredo. It will be a joint effort by the governments of
the United  States and  Mexico and the state  of Texas, designed to identify the region's
transboundary aquifers, quantify the natural and induced chemical quality of each aquifer,
characterize and quantify the available  supply of each  aquifer,  determine  the direction  of
groundwater flow and its relationship to the flow of the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo, and develop
Geographic Information System (GIS) coverages of the region.

Rinding: EPA proposes to award $200,000 to the Texas Water Development Board for the study
by September, 1996.

Partners: EPA Region 6, the Texas Water Development Board, and the Comiskm Internacional
de Limites y Aguas (CILA).

Description: The project will review existing literature and water quality information to identify
gaps where additional information is needed to characterize the  area's shared groundwater
resources.  The study will be "blind"  to political boundaries and will focus on the chemical and
physical characteristics of the aquifers.

The application and work plan are being reviewed.  The study is scheduled to be completed by
August 31, 1999.

Relevant Border XXI Objective: Water quality monitoring.

Contacts: Ken Williams, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-7166
          John Ashworth, TWDB, (512) 936-0872
          Ruben Chavez, CNA, 56 63 22 17
October 1996
                                                                                     39

-------
Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan
                ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH WORKGROUP
                        1996 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
CONTACTS:
                     U.S.
 Cochairs:
    Hal Zenick
    U.S. EPA (87)
    National Health and Environmental Effects
    Research Laboratory
    Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
    phone:      (919)541-2283
    fax:        (919) 541-4201

    Richard Walling
    Director, Office of the Americas and the Middle East
    Office of International and Refugee Health
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
    Room 18-75, Parklawn Building
    Rockville,MD 20857
    phone:      (301)443-4010
    fax:        (301) 443-6288
    e-mail:      rwalling@osophs.ssw.dhhs.gov

 Contact:
    Yolanda Banks Anderson, Ph.D.
    lexicologist, GS-0415-12/05
    National Health and Environmental Effects
        Research Laboratory
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (MD-87)
    Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
    phone:      (919) 541-0479
    fax:        (919)541-0317
    e-mail:      anderson@herl45.herl.epa.gov
                  Mexico
Cochairs:
   Dr. Gustavo Olaiz Fernandez
   Director General de Salud Ambiental
   Secretaria de Salud
   San Luis Potosi No. 192, Piso 4
   ColoniaRoma CP 06700
   phone:      (525) 584-6529 or 584-6745
   fax:        (525)584-5260

   Adrian Fernandez Bremauntz
   Director General de Gestion e Informaci6n
       Ambiental
   INE-SEMARNAP
   Ave. Revoluci6n. 1425
   Col. Tlacapac-San Angel
   Delegaci6n Alvaro Obreg6n
   Mexico, DFCP 01040
   phone:      (525) 624-3456
   fax:        (525) 624-3584

Contact:
   Dra. Rosalba Rojas
   Secretaria de Salud
   San Luis Potosi No. 192, Piso 4
   Colonia Roma, Mexico, CP 06700
   phone:             (525) 584-6160
OVERVIEW:

In the accompanying text and tables, descriptions are provided of environmental health projects
involving ICC partnerships that are ongoing (Table 1), identified as binational initiatives to be started
in 1997 (Table 2) or will undergo further discussion/consideration (Table 3).  Contacts for the
ongoing projects are provided.  Similar individuals will be identified as the initiatives are further
developed.  The specific objectives listed in the Border XXI Framework Document (Chapter 3) that
are supported by each of these undertakings is also indicated in each table. Those objectives are as
follows:

1. Improve the capacity of state, tribal and local health and environmental agencies to assess the
   relationship between human health and environmental exposures by conducting surveillance,
   monitoring and research.
                                                                                October 1996

-------
                                                  Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Operating Plan

2. Improve the capacity of state, tribal and local health and  environmental agencies to deliver
   environmental health intervention, prevention and educational services.

3. Increase the  opportunities for stakeholders on the border  (e.g., individuals, communities,
   institutions/organizations, and occupational groups)  to participate  in  environmental health
   initiatives.

4. Improve training opportunities for environmental and health personnel.

5. Improve public awareness and understanding of environmental exposure conditions and health
   problems by providing information and educational opportunities.

It is anticipated that the results of the projects will have binational, borderwide benefit. In several
instances, foil project implementation will be preceded by pilot (feasibility) activities to aid subsequent
project design. Stakeholder input will be sought during the planning and implementation of these
initiatives.
October 1996
41

-------
Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan





  Table 1: Border XXI Ongoing Environmental Health Projects Involving ICC Partnerships
Activity
Lower Rio
Grande Valley
Transboundary
Air Pollution
Project
National Human
Exposure
Assessment
Survey
(NHEXAS)
Border Project
Environmental
Health Survey of
the Texas-Mexico
Border
Environmental
Epidemiologic
Survey of Lead
Exposure of
Children in
Tijuana, Baja
California,
Mexico
Evaluation of the
Hispanic HANES
Database
FDA Market
Basket Survey
Partners
TNRCC,EPA
University of
Arizona, EPA
TDK, CDC,
ORD/EPA
Univ. of Calif, at
Irvine, ORD/
EPA; ElColegio
de la Frontera
Norte, A.C.
(COLEF),
Secretaria de
Salud
EPA
FDA; EPA
Purpose
Ascertain the contribution of transboundary air
pollution to air quality in the Lower Rio Grande
Valley.
Establish the distribution of exposure to key
environmental pollutants in communities along
the Arizona-Mexico border.
Assess environmental health conditions at
distinct areas along the Texas-Mexico border.
Determine the extent and distribution of lead
exposure among children in Tijuana, Baja
California, Mexico. Enhance public health
programs and technical infrastructure for
monitoring and prevention of childhood lead
poisoning in Tijuana, Baja California.
Evaluate database for usefulness as reference
(comparison) database for current and future
environmental health studies involving
Hispanic populations.
Provide database on levels of nutrients,
pesticides, and metals in diet including
sampling of community-specific items in three
border cities.
Environmental
Health Objective
Addressed1
1
*'2
1,2,3
1,2,4,5
1
1,2
42
                                                                                October 1996

-------
                                                      Environmental Health. Workgroup 1996 Operating Plan


   Table 1: Border XXI Ongoing Environmental Health Projects Involving ICC Partnerships
Activity
Community-
based
Epidemiology
Projects
Neural Tube
Defect (NTD)
Project
Support of
Workshops and
Conferences
Partners
AZ Dept. of
Health, National
Board of Lupus
Foundation; NM
Border Health
Office;
Physicians for
Social
Responsibility,
Univ. of Texas-
Houston/School
of Public Health
at El Paso; CDC;
ORD/EPA
TDK, CDC,
ORD/EPA
TDH, CDC,
ORD/EPA
Purpose
Epidemiologic investigation of community
identified health concerns. Specific objectives
are to (a) determine if lupus in Nogales,
Arizona is associated with exposure to
environmental contaminants; (b) characterize
well water quality in Dona Ana County, New
Mexico and identify possible health effects
related to exposure to environmental
contaminants in well water; and (c) study the
association between acute respiratory morbidity
in children and air quality in El Paso, Texas
and Sunland Park, New Mexico.
Implement a case-control study on risk factors
for neural tube defect (NTD) occurrence.
Examine feasibility of carrying out
environmental epidemiologic studies of NTD in
Mexico border communities.
Provide support for binational environmental
health meetings and workshops.
Environmental
Health Objective
Addressed1
1,2,3,5
"..
3,4,5
 1 Objective Addressed refers to the environmental health objectives described in the Border XXIFrameworkDocument. See cover
 page of this section. •
October 1996
43

-------
Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

PROJECTS:

Project: Lower Rio Grande Valley Transboundary Air Pollution Project

Purpose:  Ascertain the contribution of transboundary air pollution to air quality in the Lower Rio
Grande Valley.

Partners: Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission (TNRCC), ORD/U.S. EPA.

Description: This study will obtain air quality data and meteorological data to assess the extent of
transboundary transport of air pollutants. This will be accomplished by the strategic placement of the
monitoring stations and  application of back-trajectory models utilizing the data gathered. Data
gathered will be used as input into the models for tracking the movement of air masses as well as
evaluating associations between pollutant concentrations and wind directions and speeds.  A long-
term goal of the study will be to provide the state of Texas with background data against which future
changes in air pollutant levels in the community can be assessed. In addition, the study will provide
a cost-effective monitoring and modeling approach for use by Texas and others to address airborne
pollutant transport in other border communities. This data will provide a baseline for identification
of air pollutants that may pose a potential health risk.
Contacts:    Federal:

             TNRCC:
Stephen Hern, EPA, (702) 798-2594
ShaibalMukerjee, EPA, (919) 541-1865
Tony Franco, (210) 425-6098
Maria Aponte-Pons, (512) 239-1822.
Project: National Human Exposure Assessment Survey (NHEXAS^t Border Project

Purpose: Establish the distribution of exposure to key environmental pollutants in communities
along the Arizona-Mexico border.

Partners: University of Arizona, EPA.

Description:  The proposed project will build upon  the existing National Human Exposure
Assessment  Survey (NHEXAS) Project awarded to the state of Arizona to characterize actual
environmental exposures experienced by Arizona residents.  It takes advantage of resources and
groundwork already expended as part of the NHEXAS program. Additional sampling of Arizona
border communities will be added to the Arizona NHEXAS Project. The project will over-sample
to provide a basis for comparing exposure between communities along the border and the state's
general population. This project will establish vital reference data for ongoing and future border
studies.

Contacts:   Federal: Gary Robertson, EPA, (702) 798-2215
            University of Arizona:  Mike Liebowitz, (520) 626-6379
                                 Mary Kay O'Rourke, (520) 626-6835.
44
                                                                             October 1996

-------
                                             Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Project: Environmental Health Survey of the Texas-Mexico Border

Purpose:  Assess environmental health conditions at distinct areas along the Texas-Mexico border.

Partners: Texas Department of Health (TDH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
ORD/U.S.EPA.

Description: The Environmental Health Survey of the Texas-Mexico border is designed to assess
the relationship of environmental exposure to various risks/diseases including pesticide poisoning,
lead poisoning,  asthma, cancer, gastrointestinal diseases, and hepatitis.  About 2,100 household
surveys will be conducted to collect data on household structure, general sanitation, health conditions,
and potential sources of exposure to environmental contaminants (e.g., source of drinking water,
waste disposal practices, fish consumption, sources of lead exposure, and use of pesticides).  The
survey will be used to develop a baseline from which to reduce the incidence of environmentally-
related disease along the border through environmental health education and other public health
interventions.

Contacts:   Federal: Rossanne Philen, CDC, (770)488-7350
                     Yolanda Banks Anderson, EPA, (919) 541 -0479
            TDH:    R.J. Dutton,  (512) 458-7541.
Project: Environmental Epidemiologic Survey  of Lead Exposure  of Children in Tijuana, Baja
         California, Mexico

Purpose: Determine the extent and distribution of lead exposure among children in Tijuana, Baja
California, Mexico. Enhance public health programs and technical infrastructure for monitoring and
prevention of childhood lead poisoning in Tijuana, Baja California.

Partners: University of California at Irvine (UCI), U.S. EPA; El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, A.C.
(COLEF), Secretaria de Salud.

Description:  A geographical age-stratified epidemiological study of blood lead concentration, lead
use, and socioeconomic and demographic factors will be conducted for 1,600 Tijuana children, ages
1 to 6 years old.  The study will evaluate associations between blood lead concentration in children
and potential sources of lead exposure at the neighborhood, household, and individual level. As part
of this project, a CDC-certified blood lead testing laboratory will be established in Tijuana. The
findings of this study will expand current knowledge of lead exposure during childhood development
by studying a population with high and varied potential exposure sources. Information derived from
this study will be used to  establish public health priorities and plan public health programs for lead
surveillance and control in Tijuana.

Contacts:   Federal:  Yolanda Banks Anderson, EPA, (919) 541-0479
            UCI:     Jonathon Ericson,  (714) 824-7261.
October 1996
45

-------
Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Project: Evaluation of the Hispanic HANES Database

Purpose: Evaluate database for usefulness as reference (comparison) database for current and future
environmental health studies involving Hispanic populations.

Partners:  ORD/EPA.

Description:  As part of the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) series,
Hispanic HANES sampled 12,000 Hispanics (including 7,500 in the_southwesternU.S.) from 1982-
1984. In addition to extensive health questionnaires and physical examinations, biological fluids were
collected and analyzed for various markers including some pesticides and metals.  This database is
being resurrected and undergoing documentation to determine the extent to which the environmental
markers data can serve as a point of reference (comparison) for measurements in border populations
being studied or that may be studied.

Contacts:  Denise Lewis, EPA, (919) 966-6385
           Rebecca Calderon, EPA,  (919) 966-0617.
Project: FDA Market Basket Survey

Purpose:  Provide database on levels of nutrients, pesticides, and metals in diet including sampling
of community-specific items in three border cities.

Partners: Food and Drug Administration (FDA); U.S. EPA.

Description:  As part of their continuing national survey of food contamination in the U.S., FDA
dedicated a Total Diet Study to the border region.  Food was collected  in three communities
(Brownsville,  TX; Nogales, AZ; and San Diego, CA).  The 261-item  food market basket was
supplemented by the collection  of 30 to 40 additional food items that are typically consumed by
border residents.  These samples were analyzed for pesticides and metals.

Contact:  EPA: Maurice Berry, (513) 569-7284.
Project: Community-based Epidemiology Projects

Purpose: Epidemiologic investigation of community identified health concerns. Specific objectives
are to (a) determine if lupus in Nogales, Arizona is associated with exposure to environmental
contaminants; (b) characterize well water quality in Dona Ana County, New Mexico and identify
possible health effects related to exposure to environmental contaminants in well water; and (c) study
the association between acute respiratory morbidity in children and air quality in El Paso, Texas and
Sunland Park, New Mexico.

Partners: Arizona Department of Health, National Board of the Lupus Foundation; New Mexico
Border Health Office (NM BHO); Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR), University of Texas-
46
                                                                              October 1996

-------
                                            Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Houston/School of Public Health at El Paso (UTH/SPH-E1 Paso); Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC); ORD/U.S. EPA.

Description:  The study of lupus in Nogales will be a case-control study.  Environmental sampling
data will be reviewed to determine/select contaminants of concern.  Identification of cases will be
verified by physician diagnosis and laboratory tests. The protocol is not finalized.

The study of well water in Dona Ana County involves testing water from  120 private wells for
contaminants (heavy metals, coliphages, fecal coliforms, volatile organic compounds,  pesticides
(organophosphates and acid herbicides), nutrients, anions,  and cations).  A  health survey will be
conducted in households with elevated levels of contaminants  in wells.  Survey results will be
communicated to health-care providers (physicians, clinicians, and promotoras), farm workers, and
community residents.

The El Paso/Sunland Park respiratoiy morbidity study is a retrospective time  series examination of
the association between air quality and acute respiratory health problems in children ages 1 to 18
years old for  a two-year period.  Study subjects will be identified from hospital emergency room
records.  Air quality data (CO, NO2, O3, particulate matter, and SO2) have been collected on both
sides of the U.S.-Mexico border as part of an air monitoring project.

Contacts:   Federal: LinaBalluz, CDC, (770) 488-7350
                    Rebecca Hart, CDC,  (770) 488-7350
                    Rossanne Philen, CDC, (770) 488-7350
            NM BHO: Kitty Richards, (505) 646-7966
            PSR: Beatriz Vera, (915) 543-3223
            UTH/SPH - El Paso: James Vanderslice, (915) 747-8514.
Project: Neural Tube Defect (NTD} Project

Purpose: Implement a case-control study on risk factors for neural tube defect (NTD) occurrence.
Examine feasibility of carrying out environmental epidemiology studies of NTD in Mexico border
communities.

Partners: Texas Department of Health (TDK), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
ORD/U.S. EPA.

Description:  The Texas Department of Health initiated a three-year case-control study of risk
factors for neural tube defects in 14 counties along the Texas-Mexico border: Cameron, Hidalgo,
Starr, Webb, Zapata, Maverick, Kinney, Val Verde, Terrell, Brewster, Presidio, Jeff Davis, Hudspeth,
and El Paso. Case mothers are identified through surveillance in the 14-county study area. The case-
control protocol includes a general questionnaire, laboratory tests of biological samples, and a food
frequency questionnaire. This study is being supported by CDC and EPA and is the third component
of a project that includes neural tube defect surveillance and a vitamin supplement program that was
initiated earlier.
October 1996
47

-------
 Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

 A second component of this project is funding, through the Pan American Health Organization
 (PAHO), of small pilot projects in environmental epidemiology of NTDs. This activity is a follow-
 up to a recently completed binational workshop, during which high priority areas for PAHO's
 environmental epidemiology grants program were identified.

 Contacts:   Federal:  Sherry Selevan, EPA, (202) 260-2604
                     Joseph Mulinaire, CDC, (770) 488-7190
            TDK:    Kate Hendrix, (512) 458-7328.
Project: Support of Workshops and Conferences

Purpose: Provide support for binational environmental health meetings and workshops.

Partners:  ORD/U.S. EPA, CDC.

Description:  Support is provided for major meetings and workshops that convene environmental
health and public health specialists to exchange information, set priorities, and plan collaborative
activities, for example, the U.S.-Mexico Border Health Conference.

Contact: EPA: Hal Zenick, (919) 541-2283.
48
October 1996

-------
                                              Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan





     Table 2: Border XXI Environmental Health Initiatives Involving ICC Partnerships

Activity

The International
Toxicology and
Poison Center
Development
Program

Pesticide
Exposure and
Adverse Health
Effects in Young
Children Along
the U.S.-Mexico
Border
Advanced
Training in
Environmental
Health:
Developing
Human Resources
to Support Border
21

U.S.-Mexico
Border 21
Initiative for
Pediatric Lead
Exposure
Identification and
Risk Reduction












Partners

Secretariat of
Health, Mexico;
ECO/PAHO/WH
O; CSPI-West
Texas Regional
Poison Center
EPA/ORD, PHS,
TDK, (SALUD,
SEMARNAP)




SALUD, CDC,
SEMARNAP,
EPA, West Texas
Poison Control
Center, Univ.
Texas in El Paso,
Fogarty Center
Environment
Health Awardees
Texas Dept. of
Health, New
Mexico Dept. of
Health, Arizona
Dept. of Health,
California Dept.
of Health, EPA,
CDC, PAHO,
Mexico Border
States (Baja
California,
Sonora, Nuevo
Leon,
Tamaulipas,
Coahuila,
Chihuahua),
Mexican Federal
Agencies

Objective/Purpose

Develop Toxicology Centers in the main border
cities that will provide information on
emergency services and orientation to the
community and conduct monitoring and health
surveillance of poisonings.

Develop and implement an approach to
examine the cumulative risks in children from
persistent exposure to pesticides via multiple
sources and pathways.



Strengthen professionals and institutions in the
areas of environmental and clinical toxicology,
occupational health, epidemiology, toxic
substances and risk assessment.





Document and reduce the prevalence of
childhood lead poisoning in the border region
through better source characterization, risk
communication, and reduction of exposure and
integrated risk assessment/risk management.








„




Environmental
Health
Objective
Addressed1
2,3,4,5





1,2,3,4,5






2,4,5








1,2,4,5

















October 1996
49

-------
Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan


      Table 2: Border XXI Environmental Health Initiatives Involving ICC Partnerships
Activity
Border Health
Alert and Disease
Outbreak
Information
Exchange Using a
Guide to
Environmental
and Health
Organizations
and Internet
Bulletin Board





Partners
New Mexico
Dept. of Health;
New Mexico
Environment
Dept.; California
Dept. of Health
Services; Arizona
Dept. of Health;
Texas Dept. of
Health; Centers
for Disease
Control; PAHO;
El Paso Field
Office, EPA;
FDA; Secretaria
de Salud
Objective/Purpose
1. Establish/maintain a directory of border
environmental and health organizations.
2. Enhance exchange of information among
environmental and health agencies regarding
health alerts or disease outbreaks.
3. Improve capabilities for electronic
communication between U.S. and Mexican
health and environmental agencies.








Environmental
Health
Objective
Addressed1
2,3,4,5















 1 Objective Addressed refers to the environmental health objectives described in the Border XXIFrameworkDocument, See cover
 page of this section.
50
                                                                                        October 1996

-------
                                             Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Project: The International Toxicology and Poison Center Development Program

Purpose:  This proposal aims to develop and strengthen toxicology centers in the main border cities
to provide information on emergency services,  an orientation to the community, and conduct
monitoring and health surveillance of poisonings.

Partners:    Secretariat  of Health, Mexico;  ECO/PAHO/WHO;  CSPI-West Texas Regional
Poison Center.

Description: The specific elements of the project include:
•      Advanced  training for senior Mexican clinical toxicologists in short stays in centers  of
       excellence in the U.S. or Canada;
•      Identifying or developing, and  providing basic> low-cost bibliographic resources for the
       multiple Mexican institutions involved in poison control and disaster response;
•      Providing advice on strengthening programs for community and physician information
       services and 24-hour response capabilities;
•      Assisting Mexican institutions in the development of a basic package of low-cost antidotes
       for emergency treatment, including a distribution mechanism. This model could subsequently
       be exported to other parts of Latin America and the Caribbean;
•      Promoting the use of poison control data collection in a standardized format and using these
       data for surveillance of chemical hazards.
Project: Pesticide Exposure and Adverse Health Effects in Young Children Along the U.S.-Mexico
         Border

Purpose:  To develop and implement an approach to examine the cumulative risks in children from
persistent exposure to pesticides via multiple sources and pathways.

Partners: ORD/U.S. EPA, PHS, TDK, (SALUD, SEMARNAP).

Description:  For many border communities, a major concern is the risks from persistent, often year-
round, exposure to pesticides.  This issue is complicated  by the fact that these exposures are to
multiple pesticides from a variety of sources (land use, residential practices, etc.) via many pathways
(food, water, dust, etc.) so that the cumulative impact is unknown. Of special concern are children
since their behaviors (pica, playing in the dirt, etc.) and developmental vulnerability may substantially
increase the risk. No standardized protocol exists to study this issue.

This project will be conducted in three phases. The first phase will include a review of existing data
and methods. All  U.S. states along the U.S.-Mexico border will be included in this review. The
second phase includes initial screening of the pediatric population for evidence of pesticide exposure.
The  third phase will include  more detailed follow-up of  "high exposure" individuals  and  an
epidemiologic study, the design of which will be determined by the results of phases one and two and
specific disease outcomes  (prevalence rates)  and  their  hypothesized  temporal relationship  to
exposures.
October 1996
51

-------
Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Contact: Dr. Yolanda Banks-Anderson
          U.S. EPA
          (919)541-0479.
Project:  Advanced Training in Environmental Health: Developing Human Resources to Support
          Border XXI

Purpose: To strengthen environmental health capabilities of professionals and institutions in the
areas  of environmental and  clinical toxicology,  epidemiology,  occupational health and risk
assessment.  Approaches include training graduate students  and promoting  binational  faculty
exchanges and border sabbaticals.

Partners:  SALUD (General Directorate of Environmental Health, National Institute of Public
Health, International Affairs), CDC, SEMARNAP, U.S. EPA, West Texas Poison Control Center,
University of Texas in El Paso, Fogarty Center Environmental Health Awardees (University of Texas,
Mount Sinai School of Medicine).

Description:  This project will provide  scholarships for students at border institutions to receive
graduate training at academic institutions in either the U.S. or Mexico. The project will also support
binational faculty exchanges and provide  funding for border sabbaticals for faculty at U.S. and
Mexican institutions to engage in environmental health projects along the U.S.-Mexico border.  The
unique feature of this initiative will be linking universities with the priority monitoring and surveillance
projects of the Interagency Coordinating Committee.
Project:  U.S.-Mexico Border XXI Initiative for Pediatric Lead Exposure Identification and Risk
          Reduction

Purpose:  To document and reduce the prevalence of childhood lead poisoning in the border region
through better source characterization, risk communication, and reduction of exposure and integrated
risk assessment/risk management.

Partners:  Texas Department of Health, New Mexico Department of Health, Arizona Department
of Health, California Department of Health, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Centers for
Disease Control, Pan American Health Organization, Mexican states along  the border (Baja
California, Sonora, Nuevo Leon, Tamaulipas, Coahuila, Chihuahua), and Mexican Federal Agencies.

Description:
•      Historical Data and Information Inventory: During the first phases of this initiative,  the
       partners will identify childhood lead surveillance activities and studies that have  occurred
       previously in the border region.  Types of exposure and availability of field personnel with
       appropriate educational materials will be inventoried.  Cost and availability of screening
       techniques for products containing lead, blood lead screening, and methods for reducing lead
       exposure will be evaluated.
                                                                                October 1996

-------
                                              Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

        Data Integration and Information Outreach: Information on the prevalence of childhood lead
        poisoning and sources of lead exposure: The Lead Workgroup will assess the current status
        of lead screening programs in each of the U.S. and Mexican states, the amount of community
        education that is targeted to the border population and whether there needs to be additional
        efforts to screen children who are seen in clinics along the border.  It is expected that it will
        be necessary to increase the number of children screened, and followed, as appropriate.  In
        addition, it will be desirable to provide  educational materials to parents that emphasize ways
        to reduce lead exposure in the future.
 Project:  Border Health Alert and Disease Outbreak Information Exchange Using a Guide to
          Environmental and Health Organizations and Internet Bulletin Board

 Purpose:
 •      Establish and maintain a directory of border environmental and health organizations to
       facilitate information exchange.
 •      Enhance communication  efforts among environmental and health agency contact people
       regarding health alerts or  disease outbreaks including detailed information on the nature of
       disease outbreak and/or health alert.
 •      Establish bulletin board capabilities, via  the  Internet, for public and private access to
       information regarding.disease outbreak and/or health alert for "official" release to the public.
 •      Assist the Secretariat de Salud and other Mexican government agencies in setting up e-mail
       accounts and interim fax accounts to enhance emergency communications between U.S.
       border states and Mexico border states.

 Funding:  Funding will be needed to provide technical assistance in maintaining an environmental
 and health organization and resources directory and developing a bulletin board for the Internet.

 Partners:  New Mexico Department of Health; New Mexico Environment Department; California
 Department of Health Services; Arizona Department of Health; Texas Department of Health; Centers
 for Disease Control; Pan American Health Organization; El Paso Field Office, U.S. Environmental
 Protection Agency; Food and Drug Administration; Secretaria de Salud.

 Description: Various environmental and health agencies along the border are already in the process
 of developing portions of an environmental health directory for their respective states.  The idea of
 this project is to combine and enhance existing directories of agency contact people into a prime U.S.-
 Mexico directory to environmental and health organizations and key contact people.  This directory
 will be updated quarterly.

Next, the directory will be used to establish an Internet  address book for  the U.S. border states and
 a fax networking system for the Mexico border states to alert contact people within environmental
 and health agencies and organizations to health problems and disease outbreaks.  Finally, if a public
 health  alert is necessary or a disease outbreak established, information will be placed on a public
bulletin board or home page via the Internet to alert public  and private entities,  with complete
background information and numbers to call for reporting of new cases and questions.
October 1996
                                                                                        53

-------
Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan
            Border XXI Environmental Health Initiatives for Further Discussion


Activity

Risk and
Decision-making
Training









U.S.-Mexico
Border
Geographic
Information
System (GIS) for
Environmental
Health
















Partners

Office of
Environmental
Health Hazard
Assessment/Calif
orniaEPA,U.S.
EPA Region 9;
Departamento of
Salud Ambiemtal,
Chichuahua;
Texas Natural
Resource Cons.
Comm.
California Dept.
ofHealth
Services (CDHS),
Arizona Dept. of
Health, New
Mexico Dept. of
Health, New
Mexico
Environment
Dept., Texas
Dept. ofHealth,
Univ. of Texas
School of Public
Health, EPA,
CDC,NIEHS,
HRSA,
Ministerio de
Salud/Salud
Ambiental,
Mexican Border
States


Objective/Purpose

Provide training on risk assessment, risk
management, and risk communication as
practiced by U.S. EPA. Provide a common
bilateral understanding of the use of risk
assessment in environmental regulatory
decision-making by risk managers.






1. Identify/inventory border-related
environmental and epidemiological data in
each U.S. and Mexican state and coordinate
with existing projects using GIS data.
2. Establish a GIS which links the occurrence
of environmentally sensitive disease
conditions (sentinel health events),
demographic factors, and the location of
potential environmental hazards and known
pollution.
3. Enable standardized and consistent bi-
national and interstate exchange of health,
environmental, and demographic data.








Environmental
Health
Objective
Addressed1
1,4,5











1,2,3,4,5




















 54
                                                                                  October 1996

-------
                                                    Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan


              Border XXI Environmental Health Initiatives for Further Discussion

Activity

Mexico-U.S.
Border EIS
Program for
Environmental
Health



Continuing
Education for
Health
Professionals at
the Border














Partners

California
Department of
Health Services,
CDC,
ECO/PAHO,
Border State
Health
Departments
Calif. Dept. of
Health Services,
U.S.-Mexico
Border Health
Offices,
Asociacion de
Medicos de
Empresade
Tijuana y Tecata,
Mexican Ministry
of Health,
National Institute
of Occupational
Safety and
Health,
Universidad
Autonoma de
Baja California

Objective/Purpose

1. Create one-year Preventive Medicine
Residency program for health professionals as
follow-up year to the ECO/PAHO training
program in Mexico City.
2. Provide training/support for one Mexican
national originating from U.S.-Mexico and
based in one of the Mexican State Health
Departments.
Establish continuing education programs to
enable health professionals along the border to
respond to chemical accidents and other
environmental/occupational-related
incidences.









.



Environmental
Health
Objective
Addressed1
3,4,5







2,4,5

















  1 Objective Addressed refers to the environmental health objectives described in the Border XXI Frameivork Document. See cover
  page of this section.
October 1996
                                                                                                    55

-------
Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Project: Risk and Decision-making Training

Purpose:  The course is developed to provide training on risk assessment, risk management, and risk
communication as practiced by the U.S. EPA.  The concepts employed are accepted and used
throughout the United States and Mexico.  The primary intent of this training is to provide a common
bilateral understanding of the use of risk assessment in environmental regulatory decision-making by
risk managers.  By providing risk managers along the border  with a common understanding,
management decisions by one jurisdiction affecting other jurisdictions can be discussed in common
terms. The bases and objectives of these decisions can be better separated into health, regulatory,
and communication issues; and concerns raised about the issues can be addressed at the same level.


Funding: There is no current funding for this project. We will be seeking funding from the U.S.
EPA and other available sources.

Partners: The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment  (OEHHA) of the California
Environmental Protection Agency is currently working with U.S. EPA Region 9 to provide training
to local and  state risk management staff. While OEHHA can provide  this training alone, it is in
consultation with Region 9 staff to form a partnership in this training program.  Additional interested
participants are the Departamento of Salud Ambiemtal, Chihuahua, and the Texas Natural Resource
Conservation Commission.

Description:  This is a three-day training course presented in a workshop style for full participation
by the participants.  The goal of this training is to provide an understanding of the basis of risk
assessment, develop a common base of  knowledge on risk assessment, provide a framework for
developing risk-based management decisions, and provide knowledge on how to communicate risk
assessment and risk management information to the  public.  Risk management staff are provided
information on the usefulness of risk assessment to support effective risk-based decision-making.

Risk assessment has become an important part of regulatory decision-making in the United States
because it can be an effective tool in prioritizing agency goals by ranking environmental problems
based on their potential  impact on human health. It also is  essential in developing health-based
standards and site-specific remediation goals for contaminants which are then modified based on
social, technical, and fiscal factors.

The course is given by instructors who act both  as teachers and as facilitators. While the primary
focus of the program is to provide risk managers an understanding of how to use risk assessment in
their decision-making process, it is meant  also to identify participants who can become teachers and
facilitators. Through this course, these individuals can form teams to provide additional training in
their regions.

The teachers/facilitators will be available (via e-mail, telephone, or fax) after the workshop to answer
questions or to solve problems that participants may encounter once they start to implement the tools
of risk assessment.
                                                                               October 1996

-------
                                              Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

 Project: U.S.-Mexico Border Geographic Information System for Environmental Health

 Purpose:
 •      Identify and inventory border-related environmental and epidemiological data in each U.S.
       and Mexican state and coordinate with existing projects using Geographic Information
       System (GIS) data.
 •      Establish a GIS which links the occurrence of environmentally sensitive disease conditions
       (sentinel health events), demographic factors, and the location of potential environmental
       hazards and known pollution.
 •      Enable  standardized  and  consistent  binational and  interstate  exchange  of health,
       environmental, and demographic data.
 •      In the course of developing this system, identify weaknesses and biases in existing databases
       and recommend steps to remedy the problems.

 Funding:  The California Department of Health  Services, Environmental Health Investigations
 Branch, has received funding from NIEHS to begin establishing a GIS in San Diego and Imperial
 Counties, California. Additional funding would be needed to support activities in the other three U.S.
 border states, to support additional California effort to provide technical assistance to the other states,
 and to assure integration of the borderwide  database.  We would assist at least two interested
 Mexican border states in planning and costing out a GIS in those states. Preliminary support has been
 provided by New Mexico and Texas to begin environmental data collection and GIS activities.

 Partners: California Department of Health Services (CDHS), Arizona Department of Health, New
 Mexico Department of Health, New Mexico Environment Department, Texas Department of Health,
 University of Texas School of Public Health, U.S. EPA, CDC, NIEHS,  HRSA, Ministerio  de
 Salud/Salud Ambiental, Mexican Border States.

 Description:  There are a number of efforts on the border to integrate information about  air
 pollution, point source emissions, ground and surface water pollution, and the location of hazardous
 waste sites. The location of these potential environmental sources of contamination, along with their
 attribute  data, such  as  types and levels of pollutants, can be  used for identifying potential
 environmental hazards and for planning environmental health services.

 While substantial environmental data have been incorporated into existing GIS, very little health data
 have been merged to  allow for planning public health services, for  evaluating access to health
 services, and for exploring links between exposures and disease. To identify sites of environmental
 contamination that may  be causing health problems, the spatial distribution of incident cases of
 environmentally sensitive diseases (e.g., childhood asthma, hepatitis A, infant diarrheal mortality,
 childhood lead poisoning,  birth  defects) could be compared to the spatial distributions of the
 population and of environmental contaminants.

 The work to be carried out in the proposed first phase of the GIS effort would be to focus on the
issues of water supply, water quality, sanitation, and enteric disease.  During the initial stages, base
maps,  databases  on drinking water sources and  sanitation, and databases with  demographic
"denominators" and enteric disease incidence would be assembled in a standardized format.  All these
data sets must be acquired, "cleaned," and prepared for use in a GIS system.  At the end of two years,
a demonstration assessment could be made of the relation between specific enteric diseases and such
October 1996
                                                                                        57

-------
Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

factors as per capita water consumption, water quality, and age and type of both drinking water
distribution and sanitation systems.

Mexican colleagues would be involved in the planning of north-of-the-border activities and would
be assisted in preparing a proposal when they were ready for an application south of the border.
Ongoing coordination of the U.S. and  Mexican efforts would be facilitated by monthly phone
conferences and a yearly in-person meeting to be held before the annual Border Health Association
meeting.
Project: U.S.-Mexico Border EIS Program for Environmental Health

Purpose:
•      Create a one-year Preventive Medicine Residency program for health professionals as follow-
       up year to the current ECO/PAHO training program in Mexico City.  For purposes of this
       brief document, this program will be called the "Border EIS Program."
•      Provide training and support for one Mexican national originating from the U.S.- Mexico
       border region (border region) and based in one of the Mexican State Health Departments.
•      Have the ElS-like trainee meet the following requirements: conduct at least one field-based
       epidemiological  study in the border region in coordination with the appropriate binational
       governmental and nongovernmental groups; produce at least one scientific report suitable for
       submission to a peer-reviewed scientific journal; and attend the yearly CDC EIS conference
       in Atlanta, Georgia. Mentoring from bilingual specialists in investigative environmental health
       would be available if requested from the U.S. Border State Health Department.

Funding:  Currently, there is no funding for this project.  There is a Cal-EIS program within the
California Department of Health Services, but there is no support for any of the Cal-EIS residents to
conduct any research on the Mexican side of the U.S.-Mexico border. The ECO/PAHO program
currently does not have funding to base one  of their trainees in  the border region, but they can
conduct selective projects along the border. Thus, outside funding is being explored for this proposed
program.

Partners: California Department of Health Services is the Principal Investigator.  Partners include
the CDC and ECO/PAHO and other border state Health Departments.

Description:  There is a need for creating experienced  environmental public health professionals
within the border region.  This Border EIS Program can help toward this goal.  It is felt that a
bilingual candidate would be preferable and that establishment of contacts binationally will help
provide long-standing sources of consultation. The goal is to initially fund one person per year to
pilot test the feasibility and utility of the Border EIS Program.  Eventually, if funding allows, there
could be more border EIS trainees placed to cover different areas  of the border.
Project: Continuing Education for Health Professionals at the Border

Purpose: Establish continuing education programs to enable health professionals along the border
to respond to chemical accidents and other environmental/occupational-related incidences.
58
                                                                                October 1996

-------
                                              Environmental Health Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

 Partners: California Department of Health Services, U.S.-Mexico Border Health Offices, Asociacion
 de Medicos de Empresa de Tijuana y Tecate, Mexican Ministry of Health, National Institute of
 Occupational Safety and Health, and Universidad Autonoma de Baja California.

 Description: This project has three components:  (1) Preparing emergency room staff for chemical
 accidents at the border, (2) Environmental health education program for community practitioners,
 (3) U.S.-Mexico border training on occupational/environmental health. The first component would
 identify likely sites of chemical accidents, identify emergency rooms (ER) which would respond to
 those accidents, and provide emergency response training at these ER. The second component is
 designed to provide comprehensive education for health-care professionals regarding human exposure
 to environmental hazards. The third, component would improve the capability of local health-care
 providers to respond to occupational health problems in border work sites.
October 1996
                                                                                       59

-------
Air Quality Workgroup Implementation Plan
                         AIR QUALITY WORKGROUP
                       1996 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
CONTACTS:
                     U.S.
 Cochalr:
    David Howekamp
    Division Director
    Air Division
    U.S. EPA-Region 9
    75 Hawthorne St.
    San Francisco, CA 94105
  Contacts:
    Bill Jones
    U.S. EPA-Region 9
    75 Hawthorne St.
    San Francisco, CA 94105
    phone:  (415)744-1283
    fax:     (415)744-1072
    e-mail:  jones.bill@epamail.epa.gov

    Mathew Witosky (EPA Region 6)
    phone:  (214) 665-8015
    e-mail:  witosky.mathew@epmail.epa.gov
Cochair:
  Adrian Fernandez Bremauntz
  Director General de Gesti6n e Informaci6n
    Ambiental
  INE-SEMARNAP
  Ave. Revolucion 1425
  Col. Tlacapac-San Angel
  Delegacion Alvaro Obreg6n
  Mexico, DFCP 01040
  phone:   (525) 624 3456
  fax:     (525) 624 3584

Contact:
  Dr. Victor Hugo Paramo
  INE-SEMARNAP
  Ave. Revoluci6n 1425
  Col. Tlacopac-San Angel
  Delegaci6n Alvaro Obreg6n
  Mexico, DFCP 01040
  phone:  (525) 624-3450 and (525) 624-3451
  fax:    (525) 624-3584
 OVERVIEW:

 Annex V of the La Paz Agreement allows Mexico and the United States to evaluate the causes and
 formulate solutions to air quality problems in the border cities.  Given the increase in population,
 vehicular traffic, and industrial activity in the areas of Ciudad Juarez-El Paso-Sunland Park, Tijuana-
 San Diego, Mexicali-Imperial Valley, Nogales-Nogales, and Agua Prieta-Douglas, there is an urgent
 need to evaluate the current levels of specific pollutants.  Other areas could be added if necessary.

 Specifically, the Air Workgroup will continue efforts through their subgroups to promote the creation
 of air quality monitoring networks, emission inventories, air quality modeling, and improvement
 strategies. These strategies to improve air quality will be useful tools for local decision-makers when
 considering the interrelationship among air quality, land use, transportation planning, and economic
 development. The Air Workgroup will work closely with state and local governments, indigenous
 groups,  the private  sector, academia, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)  for the
 management of air quality in the region.  For example, bilateral agreement was reached to establish
 a Joint Advisory Committee for the Improvement of Air Quality, which will recommend strategies
 for the prevention and control of pollution in the El Paso-Juarez-Sunland Park air shed. In the course
 of the next  few years,  both  countries will be in a position to develop and apply  air quality
                                                                               October 1996

-------
                                                   Air Quality Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

improvement strategies in the border area, with the goal of achieving the air quality and health
standards of each country.

PROJECTS:

Project: U.S.-Mexico Information Center on Air Pollution
        Centro de Information sobre Contamination del Aire - CICA

Purpose:  Develop and operate an information transfer center for the U.S.-Mexico border area as
an extension  of the existing Control Technology Center (CTC).  The center (CICA) provides
Mexican federal, state and local environmental officials and universities working along the U.S.-
Mexico border with access to pertinent information related to assessment of air pollutant emissions,
ambient monitoring, dispersion modeling, and control technologies and pollution prevention programs
that will aid in achievement of emission reductions.

Funding:  FY95 - $247,000 to CICA/CTC/OAQPS;  FY96 - $100,000.

Partners: INE, CTC (EPA).

Description: The CICA capabilities include access to EPA technical expertise through a bilingual
(Spanish-English) hotline and World Wide Web home page; technical assistance and projects on air-
related problems along the border; Spanish-language versions of technical documents and air quality
models; development of a U.S.-Mexico ambient air quality monitoring clearinghouse and bilingual
bulletin board system on the Technology Transfer Network (in conjunction and integrated with the
CICA home page) to answer technical questions and provide information.

Status:
•      CICA HOTLINE (bilingual - Spanish/English) initiated 5/1/95 - fully funded through FY97.
•      Senior Environmental Employee Program. Sixty-one requests have been received.
•      167 publications delivered; software and documentation for 19 EPA models provided.
•      Projects:
       Spanish versions of SCREEN El and ISC III Models - final due September 1996
       Piedras Negras-Ciudad Acufia Monitoring Plan - final due in November 1996
       Mexicali Unique Sources Emissions Evaluation - final due in November 1996
       Ciudad Juarez Auto Body Shop Emissions - Final due in January 1997
•      CICA home page (Spanish/English) currently operational and  expanding -  ongoing
       (http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/cica/)
•      CICA brochures in English and Spanish are available from EPA contacts listed below.

Contacts: Bob Blaszczak - EPA, OAQPS (919) 541-5432/blaszczak.bob@epamail.epa.gov
           Jaime Mendieta - EPA, OAQPS (919) 541-0547/mendieta.jaime@epamail.epa.gov
           CICA Hotline (919) 541-1800; fax (919) 541-0242
           Manuel Llaneza, SEMARNAP Chihuahua
           Oscar Ibanez, SEMARNAP Chihuahua
           Victor Hugo Paramo, INE-Mexico City, 52-56-24-3451.
 October 1996
                                                                                     61

-------
Air Quality Workgroup Implementation Plan

Project: Mexico's Air Pollution Training Program
         (Training Needs Assessment and Referral)

Purpose: Build infrastructure and expertise in Mexico to deliver needed air quality management
training in an efficient and coordinated manner.

Funding: The University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) has been awarded a cooperative agreement
for $290,000 (amount funded). (Project period and budget period 10/01/94 to 09/30/97).  Regarding
resources from Mexico, Mexico has requested a loan of 13 million dollars to carry  out all the
activities to improve air quality throughout the country during the next five years.

Partners: In the United States: EPA Office of Air  Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS), EPA
Regions 6 and 9, EPA Office of International Activities (OIA),  and UTA.  In Mexico: Institute
Nacional de Ecologia (INE),  Procuradoria Federal de Protection al Ambiente (PROFEPA),
Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana de Azcapotzalco (UAM-Azc), and Institute Tecnologico de
Tijuana (ITT).

Description:  The UTA is assisting INE and its designated institutions (1) to design, develop and
implement an air pollution training needs  assessment; and (2) to establish Mexico's air pollution
training program. The first element will identify the current and future training needs of federal, state
and municipal air quality management staff in five cities along the border (Tijuana, Nogales, Ciudad
Juarez, Ciudad Acuna and Matamoros).  The second  element will  identify and develop needed
infrastructure to efficiently prepare and deliver air quality management training in Mexico.

Status:  The air  pollution training needs assessment report and the training  program blueprint
document are complete. A discussion of the two documents was held during the March  1996
binational meeting in El Paso, Texas.  Mexico's air pollution training program will be supported by
border regional training centers.  These centers will serve as main sources for training development
activities, depositories for environmental training materials, training sites, and downlink sites. The
Control of Particulate course was translated, adapted, and pilot tested in Mexico City by the UAM-
AZC and INE in July 1995.  In April 1996 the course was also offered at ITT by UAM, INE and ITT
instructors.

Schedule: INE and UTA will be visiting the Institutes Tecnologicos de Cd.  Juarez and Matamoros
to initiate negotiations on the establishment of Regional Environmental Centers in those cities.  INE,
ITT, UTA, and EPA inaugurated the first Regional Environmental Center at the ITT- April 16, 1996.
In addition to training activities, INE's plan for these centers includes having access to relevant
environmental information and environmental research activities. INE will be signing a broader
agreement with Direction General de Institutes Tecnologicos to support the  future establishment of
similar centers throughout Mexico. (INE's plan for the establishment of Regional Environmental
Centers is far beyond the extent of this project.)

Contacts:  Lourdes Morales, EPA-OAQPS, (919) 541-4940
           morales.lourdes@epamail.epa.gov
           Victor Hugo Paramo, INE-Mexico City, 52-56-24-3451.
62
                                                                              October 1996

-------
                                                     Air Quality Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Project: Mexico Emissions Inventory Development Program

Purpose: Build the capacity in Mexico for the development of emissions inventories that can be used
by both countries. These emissions data will provide Mexico with a better understanding of its own
air pollution sources and thus form the basis for developing an emissions control program.  They will
also enhance the air quality planning process in the U.S.

Funding: A total of $500,000 in FY96 grant funds will be used toward continued implementation
of Phase II. The funds were awarded to the Western Governors' Association (WGA). Regarding
resources from Mexico, Mexico  has  requested a loan  of 13 million dollars to carry out all the
activities to improve air quality throughout the country during the next five years. INE is financing
the Spanish translation of the emission inventory manuals with its own resources.

Partners:  INE, PROFEPA, WGA, border states.

Description:  The Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission of WGA and Mexico have
common needs for developing emissions inventory information. The GCVTC is sponsoring projects
to develop an emissions inventory for areas, including Mexico, that potentially contribute to regional
haze on the Colorado Plateau. Mexico is conducting a variety of air quality planning efforts that will
benefit from countrywide emission information.

Status:  The final implementation plan for the methodology has been developed. Training course
materials and inventory manuals are being prepared.  Training is tentatively scheduled for Juarez and
Tijuana in the fall of 1996. Two technical manuals have been completed (basic emissions inventory
techniques, point sources) and area source manuals are being prepared. Technical studies have been
planned and will  consist of five parts: special studies and refinement of inventory methodology;
methodology testing; validation of emission estimates; emission factor applicability to Mexico; and
uncertainty analysis. Over the next two years, pilot implementation of the methodology is targeted
for Mexicali and Tijuana.

Monitoring data and other air quality information are available through the U.S.-Mexico Air Pollution
Clearinghouse via Internet (http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/cica.html) or by telephone 919-541-1800.
By October, all monitoring data for the border will be available and will be updated quarterly.

Contacts:  John Leary,  WA (303) 623-9378
           Victor Hugo Paramo,  INE-Mexico City, 52-56-24-3451.
           Bill Kiigkendale, EPA-OAQPS
           Bill Jones, EPA-Region 9, (415) 744-1283
Project: Tijuana-San Diego/Mexicali-Tmperial Valley Air Programs

Purpose:  Develop and operate monitoring networks in Tijuana and Mexicali for nitrogen oxides,
ozone,  carbon  monoxide,  sulfur dioxide, particulates  (PM-10),  lead,  selected airborne toxic
compounds, and meteorological  parameters (e.g., wind speed/wind direction).  These efforts are
intended to lay the  foundation  for an air quality  management program with overall goals of
determining ambient  air pollutant concentrations, apportioning sources and their relative impacts,
October 1996
                                                                                       63

-------
Air Quality Workgroup Implementation Plan

recommending cost effective control strategies, and measuring progress/compliance with the national
air quality standards of each country.                                       .

Funding: Li an ongoing attempt to foster state and local involvement, EPA FY96 grant funds have
been allocated to support the following efforts of the California Air Resources Board (CARB):
(1)$300,000 for Tijuana air monitoring; (2) $300,000 for Mexicali-Imperial air monitoring. Funds
include resources for a Border Coordinator position at the CARB.  Regarding resources from
Mexico, Mexico has requested a loan of 13 million dollars to carry out all the activities to improve
air quality throughout the country during the next five years.

Partners: Primary U.S. partners are EPA, CARB, the San Diego Air Pollution Control District, and
the Imperial Valley Air Pollution Control District. Primary Mexican partners are Instituto Nacional
de Ecologia (DSIE), Procuraduria Federal de Protection al Ambiente (PROFEP A) in Mexico City and
Baja California, and the Tijuana Technical Institute (ITT).

Description: Given the recent increases in population, vehicular traffic, and industrial activity in the
Tijuana-San Diego and Mexicali-Imperial Valley air basins, there is an immediate need to evaluate
levels of targeted air pollutants. Annex V to the 1983 La Paz Agreement directs EPA and INE to
assess the causes of and develop solutions to air quality problems in border sister cities. In addition
to the La Paz Agreement directives, the Clean Air Act directs EPA, in coordination with Mexican
agencies, to monitor and improve air quality along the border.  In Mexico, this will be carried out in
accordance with the air pollution and prevention regulations under the General Law on Ecological
Balance and Environmental Protection.

The Tijuana-San Diego and Mexicali-Imperial Valley projects represent a continuation of efforts to
operate the Tijuana air monitoring network, initiate monitoring in Mexicali, purchase equipment to
complete and operate the Mexicali network, analyze  samples, quality assure data, and provide
technical support.  Emissions  inventory work will be based on the recently developed Mexican
emissions inventory methodology (See "Emissions Inventory Methodology Pilot Project").   The
methodology identifies the most appropriate emissions estimation methods by individual source type
for point area, motor vehicle, and natural sources.  A variety of inventory methods are used in the
methodology including source sampling, modeling, surveying, census-based emissions factors, activity
data, and material balance.

Status: The California-Baja California Technical Subgroup of the Binational Air Workgroup has met
regularly to discuss the projects and a contractor is providing technical support in the installation,
operation and maintenance of the network. The subgroup will be meeting in April to discuss ongoing
operation of the Tijuana network, selection of sites for the Mexicali network, and  initiation of
emissions inventory work.

Monitoring data and other air quality information are available through the U.S-Mexico Air Pollution
Clearinghouse via Internet (http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/cica.html) or by telephone 919-541-1800.
By October, all monitoring data for the border will be available and will be updated quarterly.

Contacts:  MarkFuentes, CARB, 619-645-5233;
           Octavio Alonso, SEMARNAP - Baja CA, 52-65-52-4987;
           Oralia Lopez, ITT - 52-66-21055 ext. 252;
64
                                                                               October 1996

-------
                                                    Air Quality Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

           Caspar Torres, Imperial APGD, 619-339-4606;
           Bill Jones, EPA 415-744-1283;
           Dr. Victor Hugo Paramo, INE - Ciudad de Mexico;
           Bill Oslund, CARB;
           Fernando Calzada, INE--Baja California;
           Jim Stirling, Team Environmental;
           Dan Spier, San Diego Air Pollution Control District.

Project: Ambos Noeales Air Programs

Purpose:  Complete the ongoing paniculate (PM-10) air toxics study with an overall goal of
determining ambient air pollutant concentrations, apportioning sources and their relative impacts,
recommending cost effective control strategies, and measuring progress/compliance with the national
air quality standards of each country.

Funding: In an ongoing attempt to foster state and local involvement, $175,000 in EPA FY96 grant
funds have been allocated to support the efforts of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ). These funds include support for an ADEQ Border Air Coordinator.  Regarding resources
from Mexico,  Mexico has requested a loan of 13 million dollars to carry  out all the activities to
improve air quality throughout the country during the next five years.

Partners: Institute Nacional de Ecologia (INE) and Procuraduria Federal de Protection al Ambiente
(PROFEPA), EPA, ADEQ, the state of Sonora, and the city of Nogales, Sonora.

Description: Given the recent  increases in population, vehicular traffic, and industrial activity in the
ambos Nogales air basin, there is an immediate need to evaluate levels of targeted air pollutants.
Annex V to the 1983 La Paz Agreement directs EPA and INE to assess the causes of and develop
solutions to air quality problems in border sister cities.  In addition to the La Paz Agreement
directives, the Clean Air Act authorizes EPA, in cooperation with counterpart Mexican agencies, to
monitor and improve air quality in regions along the border. In Mexico, this will be carried out in
accordance with the air pollution and prevention regulations under the General Law on Ecological
Balance and Environmental Protection.

A total of six sites measuring PM-10, PM-2.5, and meteorological parameters, as well as four air
toxics sites measuring selected air toxics, operated  on both sides of the border for one year.

Status: All sites ran on a winter-intensive (1 in 3-day cycle) sampling schedule from October 1994
through March 1995, and subsequently returned to the regular (1 in 6-day cycle) sampling schedule.
The large-scale monitoring portion of the study has terminated, although one base site will continue
operating on each side of the border for ongoing measurement of PM-10, PM-2.5 and meteorological
parameters. Emissions inventory work is underway.

 Schedule: Emissions inventory development will continue through September 1996. Subsequent
to the completion of these activities, a draft final report will be prepared by November 1996 and will
 include exposure/risk assessment,  source attribution, and potential control strategies. A final report
 should  be ready by January 1997.
 October 1996
                                                                                       65

-------
Air Quality Workgroup Implementation Plan

Monitoring data and other air quality information are available through the U.S-Mexico Air Pollution
Clearinghouse via Internet (http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/cica.html) or by telephone 919-541-1800.
By October, all monitoring data for the border will be available and will be updated quarterly.

Contacts:  Gerardo Monroy, ADEQ, (520) 628-6732                          ,
           Cesar Catalan, INE - Sonora, 52-62-13-5229.
           Bill Jones, EPA, Region 9, (415) 744-1283
           Dr. Victor Hugo Paramo, INE, Mexico City
Project: Agua Prieta-Douglas Air Programs

Purpose: Initiate a paniculate (PM-10) air toxics study with an overall goal of determining ambient
air pollutant concentrations, apportioning sources and their relative impacts, recommending cost-
effective control strategies, and measuring progress/compliance with the national air quality standards
of each country.

Funding:  In an ongoing attempt to foster state and local involvement, $225,000 in EPA FY96 grant
funds has been allocated to support the efforts of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ). These funds include support for a ADEQ Border Air Coordinator. Regarding resources
from Mexico, Mexico has requested a loan of 13 million dollars to carry out all the activities to
improve air quality throughout the country during the next five years.

Partners:  Institute Nacional de Ecologia (INE) and Procuraduria Federal de Protection al Ambiente
(PROFEPA), EPA, ADEQ, the state of Sonora, the city of Douglas, and the city of Agua Prieta.

Description:  Given the recent increases in population, vehicular traffic, and industrial activity in the
Agua Prieta-Douglas air basin, there is an immediate need to evaluate levels of targeted air pollutants.
Annex V to the 1983 La Paz Agreement directs EPA and INE to assess the causes of and develop
solutions to air quality problems in border sister cities.   In addition to the La Paz Agreement
directives, the Clean Air Act authorizes EPA, in cooperation with counterpart Mexican agencies, to
monitor and improve air quality in regions along the border. In Mexico, this will be carried out in
accordance with the air pollution and prevention regulations under the General Law on Ecological
Balance and Environmental Protection.

A total of four sites measuring PM-10, selected air toxics, and meteorological parameters will be sited
on the both sides of the border.

Status: Aworkplan has been developed and a project team meeting is scheduled for April 1997.

Schedule:  An emissions inventory will be developed by December 1996 and sampling will run from
January 1997 through December 1997. Subsequent to the  completion of these  activities,  a draft final
report will be prepared by March 1998 and will include exposure-risk assessment, source attribution,
and potential control strategies. A final report is scheduled for completion by May 1998.
                                                                              October 1996

-------
                                                    Air Quality Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Monitoring data and other air quality information is available through the U.S-Mexico Air Pollution
Clearinghouse via Internet (http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/cica.html) or by telephone 919-541-1800.
By October, all monitoring data for the border will be available and will be updated quarterly.

Contacts:  Gerardo Monroy, ADEQ, (520) 628-6732
           Cesar Catalan, INE - Sonora, 52-62-13-5229
           Bill Jones, EPA Region 9, (415) 744-1283
           Dr. Victor Hugo Paramo, INE, Mexico City.
Project: Ciudad Juarez-El Paso-Sunland Park Air Programs

Purpose: Continue a wide variety of programs including advanced monitoring, emissions inventory
development, modeling and identification of innovative emissions controls.  The overall goal of these
efforts is an air quality management program which assesses and  protects the air quality and
consequently the public health of the El Paso-Juarez border community.

Funding: In an ongoing attempt to foster state and local involvement, the following FY96 funds are
in the process of being  awarded: (1) $339,900 to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission (TNRCC); (2) $275,000 to the  city of El Paso; (3) $33,818 to the New Mexico
Environment Department (NMED); (4) $60,000 to the Environmental Defense Fund (EOF); (5)
$632,400 for contractor support.  These resources include support for a TNRCC Border Air
Coordinator position and technical staff expenses.  Regarding resources from Mexico, Mexico has
requested a loan of 13 million dollars to carry out all the activities to improve air quality throughout
the country during the next five years.

Partners: Institute Nacional de Ecologia (INE), the state of Chihuahua, the city of Juarez, TNRCC,
city of El Paso, NMED, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS), U.S. Department
of Energy, EDF, Southwest Center for Environmental Research and Policy (SCERP).

Description:  Given the physical, demographic, vehicular traffic, and industrial characteristics of the
Ciudad Juarez-El Paso-Sunland Park air basin, there is an  immediate need to evaluate levels of
targeted air pollutants.  Annex V to the 1983 La Paz Agreement directs EPA and INE to assess the
causes of and develop solutions to air quality problems in border sister cities. In addition to the La
Paz Agreement directives, the Clean Air Act authorizes EPA, in cooperation  with counterpart
Mexican agencies, to monitor and improve air quality in border regions. In Mexico, this will be
carried out in accordance with the  air pollution and prevention regulations under the General Law
on Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection.

Ongoing and new activities include (1) a joint study of ozone pollution throughout the air shed in the
summer of 1996; (2) operation of five-station monitoring network in Juarez for nitrogen oxides,
ozone, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, particulate (PM-10), lead, and wind speed/wind direction
and other meteorological parameters; (3) continued operation and deployment of new monitoring
sites adjacent to El Paso in southern Dona Ana County, NM; (4) operation of hot-spot monitoring;
(5)  collection of upper air wind speed and wind direction data for air modeling  purposes; (6)
refinement of existing emissions inventories; (7) utilization of advanced technologies to estimate
Juarez mobile source emissions; (8) improvement of Juarez industrial  emissions inventory; (9)
October 1996
                                                                                      67

-------
Air Quality Workgroup Implementation Plan

promotion of widespread community involvement in the implementation of innovative, cost-effective
air quality solutions through the continued support of the identification of El Paso - Juarez Sunland
Park as a U.S.-Mexico Air Quality Management District (AQMB) with the Joint Advisory Committee
for Air Quality Improvement. It is anticipated that the Joint Advisory Committee would work to ease
bridge queuing to reduce air emissions from idling vehicles; integrate air monitoring strategies within
the air shed, and implement economic incentive programs to quickly improve air quality.

Status: For a detailed discussion, please contact Jim Yarbrough 214-665-2164.

Contacts:  Jim Yarbrough, EPA-Region 6 (214)665-7232
           Cecilia Williams, NMED
           Archie Clouse, TNRCC
           Jesus Reynoso, City of El Paso
           Pete Emerson, EDF
           Adrian Fernandez, INE
           Dr. Victor Hugo Paramo, INE
Project: Big Bend Air Quality

Purpose: Determine by monitoring methods the likely impact of pollution sources on visibility at Big
Bend National Park.

Funding: $95,770 in FY94 and $300,000 in FY96 have been awarded to the National Park Service
(NPS). Regarding resources from Mexico, Mexico has requested a loan of 13 million dollars to carry
out all the activities to improve air quality throughout the country during the next five years.

Partners:  NPS, Institute Nacional de Ecologia (INE), Procuraduria Federal de Protection al
Ambiente (PROFEPA), Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC)

Description:  An issue in this region is the deterioration of visibility in Big Bend National Park, a
Class I protected area. Another area in the  region that is experiencing visibility impairment is the
Black Gap (Texas) State Refuge Area. Visibility is the ability to see the color, shape, contrast, and
texture of a landscape or city skyline. While natural events such as wildfire can impair visibility, often
man-made air pollution is the major cause of decreased visibility.

In 1993, concerns were raised over the possible degradation of the air quality in Big Bend National
Park. To that end and within the framework of the La Paz Agreement, an adhoc working group
exchanged views and information with the purpose of determining the possible effects on the air
quality of the Park and the probable causes of any effects. The working group met regularly from
1993-1996.

Status/Schedule:  In May 1996, the two counties agreed on a multiyear study to identify possible
sources of contamination impacting Big Bend National Park. The Big Bend Air Quality Study will
involve the analysis of monitoring data from a 19-station network to determine the origin of the types
of emissions responsible for reduced visibility in the area. The monitoring data will be used to help
determine the scope of subsequent studies projected for the summer and winter of 1997-1998.
68
                                                                               October 1996

-------
                                                    Air Quality Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Contacts: Miguel Flores, NFS-Denver, (303) 969-2072
          •Alfredo David Gidi, PROFEP A
          Jim Yarbrough, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-7232.

Project:  Brownsville-Laredo Air Programs

Purpose: Develop and operate monitoring station networks in Brownsville and Laredo for nitrogen
oxides,  ozone, carbon  monoxide, sulfur dioxide,  particulate  (PM-10), lead,  pesticides, and
meteorological parameters (e.g., wind speed/wind direction). These efforts are designed to acquire
better baseline air quality information for these cities.

Funding:   The EPA has awarded $50,000 in  FY96 funds to the  Texas Natural Resource
Conservation Commission (TNRCC).

Partners: TNRCC.

Description: We all pay, individually and as a community, an immense price for polluted air, both
in terms  of our health and our economy — in lost work days, diminished job performance, crop
damage,  reduced property values and increased health costs.  Given the physical, demographic,
vehicular traffic, and industrial characteristics of the Brownsville-Matamoros and Laredo-Nuevo
Laredo air basins, there is an immediate need to evaluate levels of targeted air pollutants. Annex V
to the 1983 La Paz Agreement directs EPA and Institute Nacional de Ecologia (INE) to assess the
causes of and develop solutions to air quality problems in border sister cities. In addition to the La
Paz Agreement directives, the Clean Air Act authorizes EPA, in cooperation with counterpart
Mexican agencies, to monitor and improve air quality in regions along the border. In Mexico, this
will be carried out in accordance with the air and pollution prevention regulations under the General
Law on Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection.

The EPA is sponsoring monitors  in both communities.  In Brownsville, TNRCC operates a
monitoring  device for polyaromatic hydrocarbons, ozone, carbon monoxide,  volatile  organic
compounds, lead, arsenic, and meteorological data. Monitoring will begin in Laredo in FY97.
Monitoring for polyaromatic hydrocarbons began in May of 1996. Monitoring data will be gathered
during FY97 for polyaromatic hydrocarbons, ozone, carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds,
lead, arsenic, and meteorological data.

Status: Sites are in operation.

Schedule:  Continued operation in 1997.

Contacts: Stuart Dattner, TNRCC
          Jim Yarbrough, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-2164.
October 1996
                                                                                      69

-------
Hazardous and Solid Waste Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan
           HAZARDOUS AND SOLID WASTE WORKGROUP
                      1996 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
CONTACTS:
                    JLSi
 Cochair.
   Jeff Scott
   Deputy Division Director
   Waste Management Division
   U.S. EPA-Region 9
   75 Hawthorne St.
   San Francisco, CA 94105

 Contacts:
   Heidi Hall
   U.S. EPA-Region 9
   75 Hawthorne St.
   San Francisco, CA 94105
   phone:  (415)744-1284
   fax:    (415)744-1072
   e-mail:  hall.neidi@epamail.epa.gov

   Bonnie Romo (EPA Region 6)
   phone:  (214) 665-6756
   e-mail:  romo.bonnie@epamail.epa.gov
                 Mexico
Cochair:
  Jorge Sanchez G6mez
  Director General Materiales, Residues y
    Actividades Riesgosas
  INE
Contact:
  Ing. Luis Wolf
  INE
  Av. Revoluci6n 1425, Nivel 12
  Col. Campestre, San Angel
  Delegacion Alvaro Obregon
  Mexico, D.F. 01040
  phone:  (525)624-3423
  fax:    (525)624-3586
  e-mail:  RTN@0488CRTN.NET.MX
The Binational La Paz Hazardous and Solid Waste Workgroup undertakes projects and
activities that promote sound waste management practices. An overarching goal of the workgroup
is to build improved capability along both sides of the border to develop and implement waste
management programs. Other primary goals of the workgroup are to improve the monitoring of
transborder  movements of hazardous  wastes and  toxic substances, and  to promote pollution
prevention and waste reduction practices. The workgroup seeks to involve key local, state and
federal officials from both countries in its activities.

PROJECTS:

Project:  Binational Field Sampling and Lab Capability (TSLO Project

Purpose: Improve the ability to detect violations of hazardous waste management and import/export
regulations along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Funding:  EPA has granted $35,000  from the Hazardous and Solid Waste Workgroup to  the
Western States Hazardous Waste Project for this project. Additional funds from the Cooperative
Enforcement and Compliance Workgroup have also been provided (see Cooperative Enforcement
and Compliance Implementation Plan).

Partners: These efforts will be  carried out in partnership with  the Binational Enforcement
Workgroup.  Other partners include EPA, SEMARNAP, INE,  PROFEPA, SINALP, U.S. and
Mexican Customs, the Western States Hazardous Waste Project, California Department of Toxic
70
                                                                           October 1996

-------
                                        Hazardous and Solid Waste Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

 Substances Control (Cal-EPA/DTSC), Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ),
 Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission (TNRCC), San Diego and other relevant border
 counties.

 Description: Conduct at least two training courses in the Binational FSLC Project training series,
 with  emphasis  on building field sampling  and analysis capability.   Explore the possibility of
 implementing other projects outlined in Region 9's "Proposal to Expand and  Improve Hazardous
 Waste Field Sampling and Lab Capability along the U.S.-Mexico Border" (e.g., personnel exchanges,
 lab inventory, regulatory comparison). Explore creation of a mobile lab for the border area.

 Contacts: Heidi Hall-EPA Region 9;
          Luis Wolf, Lenka Ruiz - INE.
Project:  Establish Regional Subgroups

Purpose:  The establishment of geographically-based subgroups would allow for enhanced
coordination on Workgroup initiatives, enforcement issues and other matters of mutual concern. The
subgroups would facilitate the development of improved networks for information exchange and
coordination among key local, state and federal officials on both sides of the border.

Funding: EPA has granted $16,000 from the Hazardous and Solid Waste Workgroup to the Western
States Hazardous Waste Project for this project.  Additional funds from the Enforcement Workgroup
have also been provided (see Enforcement Implementation Plan).

Partners: Participants include EPA, SEMARNAP, PROFEPA, INE, U.S. and Mexican Customs,
DOT, SCT, Cal-EPA/DTSC, ADEQ, TNRCC, New Mexico's Hazardous and Radioactive Materials
Bureau (HRMB) and appropriate local agencies.

Description:  The first regional Workgroup meeting for the California-Baja California region took
place on February 22, 1996 in San Diego and addressed, among other things, the Binational Field
Sampling and Lab Capability Training. A Texas-New Mexico-Chihuahua regional subgroup has been
formed and held its first meeting on March 4, 1996.  Six additional meetings over the rest of 1996
have been planned. Similar regional subgroups are being organized for the Arizona-Sonora, Texas-
Coahuila, and Texas-Tamaulipas border areas.

Contacts: Heidi Hall, Chris Reiner, John Rothman - EPA Region 9;
          Bonnie Romo, Efren Ordonez - EPA Region 6;
          Luis Wolf, Lenka Ruiz - INE.
Project:   Technology Transfer - Hazardous Waste Training

Purpose: Improve waste management capability among environmental and regulatory officials along
the U.S.-Mexico border.

Funding: EPA has provided $137,000 to PRC Environmental Management, Inc. for this project.

Partners: Participants include EPA, PROFEPA, INE, Cal-EPA/DTSC, ADEQ, San Diego County.
October 1996
                                                                                    71

-------
 Hazardous and Solid Waste Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

 Description: We will conduct two or more training courses with INE and PROFEPA on hazardous
 waste management with a focus on specific sites that present good opportunities for field training.
 The course will cover site identification and inspections, preliminary assessments and prioritization,
 stabilization options, removal and remediation options, and the most appropriate use of risk
 assessment.  Other topics include the U.S. approach to community relations and public participation
 in siting, enforcement options, and determining and handling liability.

 Contacts: Heidi Hall - EPA Region 9;
           Luis Wolf, Lenka Ruiz - INE.
 Project:   Environmental Technology Initiative - San Diego-Tijuana WasteWiSe Project

 Purpose:  Work with the cities of San Diego and Tijuana to assess the solid waste stream of the
 maquiladora/industrial sector along the border and the extent of current binational recycling efforts.
 Identify and implement opportunities for recycling, reuse and solid waste prevention.

 Funding: EPA has awarded a grant of $280,000 to the California Integrated Waste Management
 Board for this project.

 Partners:  EPA,  Cal-EPA Integrated Waste Management Board, cities of San Diego and Tijuana,
 San Diego  State University, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California,  Science  Applications
 International Corporation.

 Description:  Provide  on-site waste reduction opportunity  assessments and develop binational
 electronic database for tracking recycled materials, products and recycling companies.  This project
 will be managed  and implemented in conjunction with the Recycling Market Development Zone
 project described below and in cooperation with the Pollution Prevention Workgroup.

 Contact:  Chris Reiner - EPA Region 9.
Project:   San Diego-Tijuana Recycling Market Development Zone Initiative

Purpose:  Work with the cities of San Diego and Tijuana to develop a Binational Recycling Market
Development  Zone  that will  divert  materials  with value  from  the  waste  stream  of
commercial/industrial entities along the border and seek to attract businesses that manufacture with
recycled materials to the area.  This project will be carried out in cooperation with the Pollution
Prevention Workgroup.

Funding:  EPA has awarded a grant of $60,000 to the City of San Diego for this project.

Partners:  EPA, cities of San Diego and Tijuana, Cal-EPA Integrated Waste Management Board.

Description:  Assess current cross-border trade of recyclables and barriers to expanding current trade
levels. Evaluate options for creating regulatory, financial and other incentives for attracting recycling
businesses to a designated geographic area in Tijuana that will adjoin with the current Otay Mesa
Recycling  Market Development Zone.  This project will be  carried out in cooperation with the
Pollution Prevention Workgroup.
72
                                                                               October 1996

-------
                                        Hazardous and Solid Waste Workgroup 1996 Implementation PJan
Contact:  Chris Reiner - EPA Region 9.
Project:  City of Nogales Pollution Prevention Program

Purpose:  Establish a pollution prevention program for ambos Nogales.

Funding:  EPA has contributed $33,000 to an Intergovernmental Personnel Act person to carry out
this program.

Partners: EPA, cities of Nogales, Arizona and Nogales, Sonora, ADEQ.

Description:   Work with the cities of Nogales, Arizona and Nogales, Sonora to implement a
pollution prevention program that will provide technical assistance to industry, institute a pollution
prevention award program and provide outreach and education to the public.

Contact:  Chris Reiner - EPA Region 9.


Project:  Alco-Pacifico

Purpose:  Facilitate adoption and implementation of a remediation plan for a former lead recycling
facility, known as the Alco Pacifico site. Provide technical assistance on an as-needed basis. Conduct
at least one training course in conjunction with remediation of the site.

Funding: EPA has provided technical assistance to SEMARNAP for this project.

Partners: EPA, PROFEPA, L.A. District Attorney's Office.

Description: Provide technical reviews of proposals for site remediation as requested.  Provide other
technical or administrative assistance as requested by  PROFEPA to facilitate stabilization  and
remediation of the site.

Contact:  John Rothman, Heidi Hall - EPA Region 9;
          Eduardo Jimenez - PROFEPA;
          Luis Wolf - INE.
Project:  HAZTRAKS

Purpose: Assess current functions and overall effectiveness of the HAZTRAKS transboundary waste
tracking system in order to improve binational monitoring of hazardous waste movements and
enforcement of import/export regulations. Assess feasibility of expanding system to include data from
and electronic interchanges with other agencies in Mexico and the U.S. Plan the future direction of
HAZTRAKS, with respect to  system expansion and overall system operating plan.  Coordinate
decisions and activities through the binational subgroup on HAZTRAKS and transboundary shipping
issues.
October 1996
                                                                                      73

-------
Hazardous and Solid Waste Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Funding: EPA has provided $356,000 over two years to PRC Environmental Management, Inc.for
this project.

Partners: EPA, SEMARNAP, INE, PROFEPA, and with assistance from Arizona, California, New
Mexico and Texas.

Description:  Develop draft and final assessment reports, including recommendations for system
improvements. The draft report will be  widely distributed to solicit comments and additional
information to be included in the final report.  The final report will serve  as a basis  for the
HAZTRAKS/Transboundary Tracking subgroup to select and implement recommendations for
system improvement or expansion.

Contacts: Joe Schultes, Bonnie Romo - EPA Region 6;
          Heidi Hall, Marc Mowrey - EPA Region 9;
          Hugh Harleston, Luis Wolf- INE.
Project:  Texas Border Solid Waste Compliance and Assessment of Illegal Landfills

Purpose: To determine waste disposal and collection needs of border communities along the Texas
border region regarding illegal dumping, and to improve municipal waste management practices
through public education.

Funding: EPA has granted $222,727 to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission for
this project.

Partners: Participants include EPA, TNRCC, and border regional planning agencies (COGs).

Description: This project will focus on compliance assurance with regard to illegal dumping of
municipal solid waste along the Texas-Mexico border, the magnitude of the problem and its causes,
with particular emphasis on illegal dumping in and around the border's colonias, and maquiladora
waste issues. Work on the project will include assessment of border disposal capacity, development
of information and contact databases, assistaing local governments seeking funding for border solid
waste projects, and a variety of outreach activities to ensure adequate coordination and cooperation
with all entities involved in border solid waste problem resolution.

Contact: Matthew Witosky, Paul Thomas - EPA Region 6.
Project:  Training for Customs Inspectors

Purpose: Facilitate information sharing and increase capability by U.S. and Mexican Customs
personnel to detect and handle illegal hazardous waste shipments.

Funding: EPA has granted $9,000 from the Hazardous and Solid Waste Workgroup to the Western
States Hazardous Waste Project for this project. Additional funds from the Cooperative Enforcement
and Compliance Workgroup have also been provided (see Cooperative Enforcement and Compliance
Implementation Plan).
74
October 1996

-------
                                        Hazardous and Solid Waste Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Partners:  EPA, Enforcement Workgroup, California DISC, ADEQ, TNRCC, New Mexico HRMB,
San Diego County, Western States Hazardous Waste Project and the Southern Environmental
Enforcement Network.

Description: Partner with the Enforcement Workgroup to repeat the successful training courses that
were  held along the California-Baja  California  and Texas  borders on detection  of illegal
transboundary hazardous waste and hazardous materials shipments in fiscal year 1995, Hold at least
one course, more if possible, along the Arizona-Sonora border in 1996.  One course in each of the
border areas of Ciudad Juarez-El Paso, Acuna-Del Rio-Eagle Pass, and Nuevo Laredo-Laredo-
Matamoros-Brownsville.

Contact:  Bonnie Romo - EPA Region 6;
          Heidi Hall, Chris Reiner - EPA Region 9;
          Luis Wolf, Lenka Ruiz - INE.
Project:  Vulnerability Atlas

Purpose: Develop a map to assist with identification of potential areas for the siting of waste
management facilities and to help target geographic priorities for waste management activities.

Funding: SEMARNAP will provide $100,000 from a World Bank loan for the implementation of
this project.

Partners: EPA, SEMARNAP, INE.

Description: Project scope to be developed.           .                              ,

Contacts: Oscar Armendariz, Luis Wolf Hegmann, Lenka Ruiz - INE;
          Heidi Hall-EPA Region 9;
          Bonnie Romo - EPA Region 6.
Project Name: Environmental Auditing

Purpose and Objective:  Partner with Enforcement Workgroup to hold a technical seminar for U.S.
and  Mexican industries to stimulate participation by border industries  in Mexican and U.S.
environmental auditing programs.

Funding: EPA provided $50,000 from the Hazardous and Solid Waste Workgroup to S AIC for this
project.  Additional funds from the Cooperative Enforcement and Compliance Workgroup were also
provided (see Cooperative Enforcement and Compliance Implementation Plan).

Partners: EPA, Enforcement Workgroup, CEC, Cal-EPA/DTSC, PROFEPA.

Description: Provide information on each country's environmental auditing programs and policies,
the development of programs or systems that include routine  environmental auditing, and the
potential for use of pollution prevention techniques or strategies to address compliance issues.
October 1996
                                                                                     75

-------
Hazardous and Solid Waste Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Contacts: Heidi Hall - EPA Region 9;
          Larry Sperling - EPA Headquarters;
          Jaime de la Cruz - PROFEPA.
Project:   Technical Support to the Border Environmental Cooperation Commission (BECO

Purpose:   The BECC will soon be considering border  solid and possibly hazardous waste
infrastructure projects for funding. The Workgroup will seek to provide technical support to the
BECC during the review and selection process for such projects.

Funding:  None

Partners:  EPA, SEMARNAP, Cal-EPA/DTSC, ADEQ, TNRCC.

Description:  See above.

Contacts: Heidi Hall, Chris Reiner - EPA Region 9;
          Bonnie Romo, Matthew Witosky - EPA Region 6;
          Luis Wolf, Lenka Ruiz - INE.


Project:   Information Exchange

Purpose:  Provide INE with information on clean-up levels and risk-based corrective action levels
for petroleum leaks and spills to be used in remediation of PEMEX sites.  Provide INE with
information on conditions under which PCBs may be imported into the U.S. Provide compliance
information on companies exporting hazardous wastes without Mexican Guias. Company names will
be provided by Mexico.

Funding:  None

Partners:  EPA, INE, Cal-EPA/DTSC, ADEQ, TNRCC.

Description:  See above.

Contact:  Bonnie Romo, Joe Schultes - EPA Region 6;
          Heidi Hall, Chris Reiner - EPA Region 9;
          Luis Wolf, Lenka Ruiz - INE.


Project:   Repatriation Strategies

Purpose:  To analyze the strategies and the Guidelines for Repatriation and propose mechanisms for
their application to hazardous  substances and wastes, and municipal wastes.

Funding:  No funding required.

Partners:  SEMARNAP, EPA, PROFEPA, Border States
76
                                                                           October 1996

-------
                                        Hazardous and Solid Waste Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Description: To analyze the transborder movements of hazardous substances and solid wastes and
inlcude them in strategies for repatriation of hazardous wastes.

Contacts: Luis Wolf, Lenka Ruiz - INE;
          John Rothman, Heidi Hall - EPA Region 9;
          Efren Ordonez, Bonnie Romo - EPA Region 6.


Project:  Control and Monitoring of Hazardous Waste Storage. Treatment and Disposal Facilities

Purpose:  Establish technical strategies for the stages of design, construction, and monitoring of
facilities for the management of hazardous wastes.

Funding: None identified.

Partners: SEMARNAP, INE, PROFEPA, SRE, CILA, CNA, EPA

Description:  Create an integrated working group of technical experts, academics and agency
specialists of both countries who will work together to establish technological criteria for the phases
of design, construction of new and monitoring of existing facilities for the storage, treatment and
disposal of hazardous wastes.

Contacts: Luis Wolf, Lenka Ruiz  - INE;
          Heidi Hall - EPA Region 9;
          Bonnie Rbmo - EPA Region 6.
 October 1996
                                                                                      77

-------
 Contingency Planning and Emergency Response Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan
                       CONTINGENCY PLANNING AND
                  EMERGENCY RESPONSE WORKGROUP
                        1996 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
 CONTACTS:
                     U.S.
  Cochair:
     Mr. Jim Makris
     U.S. EPA
     Mailcode: 5101
     401 M Street, SW
     Washington, DC 20460
     phone:   (202) 260-8600
     fax:     (202)260-7906
     e-mail:   makris.jim@epamail.epa.gov

  Contacts:
     Ms. Kim Jennings
     U.S. EPA
     Mailcode: 5101
     401 M Street, SW
     Washington, DC 20460
     phone:   (202) 260-5046
     fax:     (202) 260-7906
     e-mail:  jennings.kim@epamail.epa.gov

     Fendol Chiles (EPA Region 6)
     phone:   (214)665-2283

     Kathleen Shimmin (EPA Region 9)
     phone:   (415) 744-2216
                  Mexico
Cochair:
   Eduardo Jimenez L6pez
   Director General de Planeaci6n y Coordinaci6n
   Procuraduria Federal de Protecci6n al Ambiente
   PerifeYico Sur 5000, Piso4
   Col. Insurgentes Cuicuilco
   Mexico, DF C.P. 04530
   phone:   (525) 528-5482, 528-5483
   fax:     (525)666-9452

Contact:
   Jaime E. Garcia Sepiilveda
   Director of Clasificaci6n de Zonas de Riesgo
    Ambiental
   Procuraduria Federal de Protecci6n al Ambiente
   Perife"rico Sur 5000, Piso4
   Col. Insurgentes Cuccilco
   Mexico, DF  C.P. 04530
   phone:   (525) 666-9450
   fax:     (525) 666-9452
PROJECTS:

Project: Technical Assistance Workshops for Sister Cities

Purpose:  To assist sister cities in developing sister city contingency plans and to discuss joint
chemical emergency planning and response between the sister cities.

Funding: EPA resources.

Partners: Federal and state officials and sister city representatives.

Description: Technical assistance workshops were held in Calexico/Mexicali; McAllen/Reynosa; and
Eagle Pass/Piedras Negras. These workshops were conducted by the International City/County
Management Association under a cooperative agreement with EPA.  The purpose of these workshops
was to bring together sister cities to identity chemical emergency planning and response issues and
work to resolve those issues and develop a joint sister city contingency plan.
78
                                                                             October 1996

-------
                          Contingency Planning and Emergency Response Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan
Relevant Border XXI Obj ectives:
•  Implement and complete the following pending activities: joint contingency plan, notification
   system, and procedures for the quick mobilization of transboundary movement of emergency
   response personnel and equipment.
•  Promote the creation of and coordination between  Local Emergency Planning Committees
   (LEPCs) in the U.S.  and Local  Committees for Mutual Assistance (CLAMs) in Mexico in
   developing the information on hazardous materials inventories in computer databases.
•  Initiate communication to the public about chemical risk in the area in an effort to create a public
   awareness and to increase public participation in contingency planning.
•  Encourage industrial facilities to make use and storage of chemicals information and inventories
   available to local response officials and provide response equipment and assistance in the event
   of a chemical emergency.

Contact: Kim Jennings (202) 260-5046; fax (202)260-7906 (e-mail: jennings.kim@epamail.epa.gov).


Project:  Inventory of Emergency Response Resources in Mexican Sister Cities

Purpose: Gather information on each of the Mexican sister cities with regard to agencies, personnel,
equipment, etc. related to chemical emergency contingency planning and response.

Funding: PROFEPA.

Partners: PROFEPA and Mexican sister cities.

Description: Development of emergency response inventory for each sister city will allow for an
assessment of the current state of readiness in each of the Mexican sister cities as well as easy access
to information during an emergency response.  The first states where this will be implemented are
Baja California and Chihuahua. These inventories currently exist for each of the U.S. sister cities.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•  Implement and complete the following pending activities: joint contingency plan, notification
   system, and procedures for the quick mobilization of transboundary movement of emergency
   response personnel and equipment.
•  Create  an  Emergency Response Center in each neighboring city, with adequate computer
   equipment  and chemical substances databases.
•  Promote the creation of and coordination between  Local Emergency Planning Committees
   (LEPCs) in the U.S.  and Local  Committees for Mutual Assistance (CLAMs) in Mexico in
   developing the information on hazardous materials inventories in computer databases.

Contact: Jamie Garcia (525) 666-9450; fax (525) 666-9452;
         Kim Jennings (202) 260-5046.
October 1996
                                                                                      79

-------
Contingency Planning and Emergency Response Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Project:  Border Movement of Personnel and Equipment and Liability Issues

Purpose:   Establish  a U.S.-Mexico  Workgroup  to  examine  issues impacting cross-border
mobilization of personnel and equipment during a hazardous materials emergency and resolve
problems related to legal responsibility.

Funding: The project will be realized through the participation of U.S. and Mexican federal, state
and local agencies.

Partners: Federal, state, and local agencies and officials with responsibilities in the area of chemical
emergency preparedness and response.

Description: Both countries need to  mobilize emergency response resources quickly, without
impairment,  to assist each other during cross-border chemical incidents.  In order to ensure no
impediments to cross-border response, the Workgroup will review current barriers to rapid cross-
border mobilization of personnel and equipment; identify appropriate agencies, programs, experts,
etc. to assist in addressing those barriers, and develop recommendations for a course of action to
resolve the barriers.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•   Implement and complete the following pending activities: joint contingency plan, notification
    system, and procedures for the quick mobilization of transboundary movement of emergency
    response personnel and equipment.
•   Government officials in both countries will work to  remove impediments - legal, political and
    liability issues - related to emergency response, including compensation from responsible parties.
•   The  issue/incident-specific Joint Response Team  (JRT)  will be  responsible  for effective
    implementation of the Inland Plan on a regional level in the U.S. and on a state and local level in
    Mexico in accordance with the policies of the JRT and the JCP.

Contact: Jim Staves (214) 665-6485; fax (214) 665-7447.

Project:  CAMEO Translation and Training

Purpose: Translate CAMEO (Computer-aided Management of Emergency Operations), into Spanish
and identify a strategy for distributing and providing training on CAMEO to the sister cities.
CAMEO is a computer system jointly developed by NOAA and EPA.

Funding: EPA resources.

Partners: NOAA, EPA and PROFEPA.

Description:  CAMEO can hold information on hazardous substances, industries,  emergency
response groups, maps, and other matters.  This will aid in identifying hazardous chemical risks in the
sister cities and,  in some instances, assist in the decision-making process in an emergency.  This
system has been  developed for Windows, and that version will be translated into Spanish. A pilot
project will be undertaken in several sister cities to ensure effective use of the system.
80
October 1996

-------
                          Contingency Planning and Emergency Response Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

 Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
 •   Implement and complete the following pending activities: joint contingency plan, notification
    system, procedures for the quick mobilization of transboundary movement of emergency response
    personnel and equipment, and a pilot project with CAMEO.
 •   Promote the creation of and coordination between Local Emergency Planning Committees
    (LEPCs) in the U.S. and Local Committees for Mutual Assistance (CLAMs) in Mexico in
    developing the information on hazardous materials inventories in computer databases.
 •   Encourage industrial facilities to make use and storage of chemicals information and inventories
    available to local response officials and provide response equipment and assistance in the event
    of a chemical emergency.

 Contact: Sherry Fielding (202) 260-6174; fax (202) 260-7906 (e-mail:
 fielding.sherry@epamail.epa.gov).
Project: Joint Contingency Plan (TCP)

Purpose:  Complete review and  revision of the U.S.-Mexico JCP which serves as a basis for
coordination at the federal and state levels.

Funding: The project will be funded through the contributions of all participants.

Partners: Expanded Joint Response Team (JRT) and 14 sister city pairs.

Description:  The last version of the JCP has been revised by the Expanded Joint Response Team.
The JCP will go through a final review by the JRT and will be signed by both countries. This plan
will be used as an umbrella plan for development of the 14 sister city plans.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•   Implement and complete the following pending activities: joint contingency plan, notification
    system, and procedures for the quick mobilization of transboundary movement of emergency
    response personnel and equipment.

Contact:  Sherry Fielding (202) 260-6174; fax (202)260-7906
    (e-mail: fielding.sherry@epamail.epa.gov).
Project: U.S.-Mexico Notification Procedures

Purpose: Develop a fast and effective notification procedure in cases of environmental emergencies
and establish a National Response Center in Mexico.

Funding: The project will be funded through the Joint Response Team.

Partners: Joint Response Team agencies.
October 1996
                                                                                     81

-------
Contingency Planning and Emergency Response Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Description: The U.S. National Response Center will clarify notification protocols for chemical
incidents along the U.S.-Mexico border. Mexico will establish a national response center to facilitate
rapid notification to all appropriate authorities on chemical incidents along the U.S.-Mexico border.
In support of this effort, EPA will arrange for PROFEPA representatives who are involved with
Mexico's new response center to visit the U.S. National Response Center, CHEMTREC, and other
installations. EPA will also explore opportunities for training for Mexican personnel in the National
Response Center.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:
•   Implement and complete the joint contingency plan and the notification system.
•   Create an Emergency Response Center in each neighboring city, with adequate computer
    equipment and chemical substances databases.
•   Integrate a  specialized  team of emergency response personnel  and prepare  training and
    simulations for the Response Center, the Communications Center, and for the management of the
    mobile units.

Contact: Kim Jennings (202)260-5046; fax: (202) 260-7906 (e-mail: jennings.kim@epamail.epa.gov)
          Jamie Garcia (525) 666-9450; fax: (525) 666-9452.
82
October 1996

-------
  ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION RESOURCES WORKGROUP
                      1996 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
CONTACTS:
                   U.S.
 Cochair:
    Nora McGee
    U.S. EPA-Region 9 (PI)
    75 Hawthorne
    San Francisco, CA 94105
    e-mail:    McGee.Nora@epamail.epa.gov
 Contacts:
    Carmen Maso
    U.S. EPA - Region 9 (P52)
    75 Hawthorne
    San Francisco, CA 94105
    e-mail:    maso.carmen@epamail.epa.gov
    phone:    (415)744-1750
    fax:      (415)744-1474

    David Parrish (EPA Region 6)
    phone:    (214)665-8352
    e-mail:    parrish.david@epamail.epa.gov
                 Mexico
Cochair
   Adrian Fernandez Bremauntz
   Director General de Gesti6n e Informaci6n
    Ambiental                  ... .
   INE-SEMARNAP
   Ave. Revolution 1425
   Col. Tlacapac-San Angel
   Delegaci6n Alvaro Obreg6n
   Mexico, DF CP01040
   phone:   (525)6243456
   fax:      (525)6243584

Contact:
   Rolando RiosAguilar
   Director de Informaci6n Ambiental
   INE-SEMARNAP
   Ave. Revoluci6n 1425
   Col. Tlacopac- San Angel
   Delegation Alvaro Obreg6n
   Mexico, DF CP01040
   phone:   (525) 624-3454
PROJECTS:

Project: U.S.-Mexico Aerial Photography and Mapping Initiative

Purpose: As part of Environmental Information Resource Workgroup there is a formal binational
initiative to acquire aerial photography and create new and revised maps in the U.S.-Mexico border
region.

Funding: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is funded for the aerial photography acquisition and the
FY96 digital elevation model (DEM), digital raster graphics (DRG), and digital line graphs (DLG)
public land survey system (PLSS and boundaries) production. Funding for FY97 and beyond is now
being planned. Funding sources include DOI/USGS, EPA, IBWC, state and local agencies.

SEMARNAP and INEGI are anticipating receipt of approximately $130,000 to initiate work in the
priority areas. Funding  sources include the North American Commission for Environmental
Cooperation and the U.S.

Partners: DOI/USGS, SEMARNAP, INEGI.
October 1996
                                      83

-------
Environmental Information Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Description:  The new aerial photography will be used as the foundation for subsequent binational
digital mapping efforts and for populating geographic information systems (GIS). GIS will be used
to integrate and analyze geospatial data in a compatible format, on both sides of the border, to
develop effective and appropriate strategies for decision-makers on issues such as:

      Natural resources and biodiversity protection
      Land use planning
      Environmental impact assessments
      Water resources
      Geologic studies
      Forest management
      Waste disposal sites
      Pollution detection and monitoring
      Emergency response.

The USGS is now acquiring color infrared (CIR) photography for the entire U.S. portion of the
boundary region.  Photography acquisition was initiated in January 1995 and will be completed in
September 1996.

Based on the requirements  of SEMARNAP,  Institute Nacional de Estadistica,  Geografia  e
Informatica (TNEGI) will acquire color infrared and black and white photography in priority areas to
complete coverages of the Mexico border region. Seventy percent of this region has existing black
and white photography that was acquired from 1993-1995. During 1996,  INEGI will begin the
acquisition of CIR imagery over the priority areas as determined by SEMARNAP.  These priority
areas cover approximately 30 percent of the border area and additional areas will be considered as
additional resources become available.

The USGS is producing l:24,000-scale geospatial data, within the U.S. 100-mile border region,
consisting of 2581 7.5-minute quadrangles. During FY96 the USGS will produce all OEMs, DRGs,
and DLGs for boundaries and the PLSS. In FY97, USGS is planning to begin the production of
digital orthophotography quadrangles (1:12,000 scale) and revision of the 7.5-minute quadrangles.

INEGI is producing l:50,000-scale geospatial data in the border region based on black and white
photography.  Digital elevation models will be produced as part of the digital topographic map
production. Using the CIR imagery as a source, 1:20,000 digital maps will be produced for the
priority areas.

Relevant Border XXI Objective:  This addresses the long-term goal of establishing a unified GIS
for the U.S.-Mexico border area.

Contact: Mr. Ken Osborn (303) 202-4138 (e-mail: kosborn@usgs.gov).
Project:  Home Page Development

Purpose: To create an effective mechanism of sharing information, EPA and SEMARNAP will
create a BORDER XXI home page.
84
                                                                             October 1996

-------
                                  Environmental Information Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

 Funding: $20,000.

 Partners: EPA/SEMARNAP.

 Description: In order to promote public access to the maximum extent possible through the Internet,
 a home page will be created of border-related environmental information on the Internet which will
 include, among other items:

        Border XXI accomplishments and plans
        Compendium of EPA binational and domestic U.S.-Mexico activities
        Ongoing and planned community project status
        Points of contact
        Environmental education information
        Links to related home pages.

 Relevant Border XXI Objective:  This addresses the long-term goal of improving and increasing
 public access to information.

 Contact: Marie Martel (415) 744-1639 (e-mail: martel.marie@epamail.epa.gov)
          Carmen Maso (415) 744-1750 (e-mail: maso.carmen@epamail.epa.gov).
 Project: Information Centers

 Purpose:   Improve and  increase public access to information through the establishment of
 information and training centers in Mexico and the continued maintenance and expansion of the EPA
 Border Liaison Offices.

 Funding: To be determined.

 Partners: EPA/SEMARNAP.

 Description: Maintain and expand the Border XXI repositories established in El Paso, Texas and
 San Diego, California Border Liaison Offices. Establish workstations connected to the Internet and
 other on-line environmental services in the EPA Border Liaison Offices.

Establish public Environmental Information and Training Centers in Mexico. Center patrons will be
able to review hard-copy publications and access information on workstations that will be connected
to the Internet and SEMARNAP and EPA on-line environmental services.

Relevant Border XXI Objective: This addresses the long-term goal of improving and increasing
public access to information.

Contact: Adrian Fernandez with SEMARNAP
         Brent Maier (619) 235-4767 (e-mail: maier.brent@epamail.epa.gov).
October 1996
                                                                                     85

-------
Environmental Information Resources Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Project: Environmental Indicators

Purpose: Environmental indicators, by systematically organizing information, serve as a fundamental
tool for measuring whether environmental policy addresses the most urgent environmental issues.
They can also provide clear and comprehensive information to the public on the status of the
environment on the U.S.-Mexico border.

Funding: To be determined.

Partners: SEMARNAP/EPA.

Description: The Office of Policy and Program Evaluation, U.S. EPA sponsored a workshop on
Baseline Indicators for the U.S.-Mexico Border which was held between September  18 and 20, 1995
in San Diego, California. It successfully brought together a diverse group from the United States and
Mexico to discuss issues of information relevant to decision-making within the border area.

The workshop workgroups also recommended that the Border XXI's Environmental Information
Resources Workgroup follow up on at least those recommendations that support its role as a central
clearinghouse of border data and information  and that it is inclusive of all data  and information
sources.  There was also general consensus on the need for a data inventory that is kept current as
new data collection and information efforts emerge. In this regard, the workshop data inventory is
a good foundation for such a comprehensive inventory. The workshop data inventory was designed
to identify data gaps, eliminate duplication of efforts, and facilitate the exchange of information.

Relevant Border XXI Objective: This addresses the long-term goal of developing environmental
indicators for the border region.

Contact:  Adrian Fernandez with SEMARNAP.
86
                                                                              October 1996

-------
                 POLLUTION PREVENTION WORKGROUP
                        1996 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
 CONTACTS:
                     U.S.
  Cochairs:
     Sam Coleman
     Director, Compliance Assurance and Enforcement
     Division
     U.S. EPA - Region 6 (mail code 6EN)
     First Interstate Bank Tower at Fountain Place
     1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200
     Dallas, TX 75202-2733
  Contacts:
     Joy Tibuni
     U.S. EPA - Region 6 (mail code 6EN-XP)
     First Interstate Bank Tower at Fountain Place
     1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200
     Dallas, TX 75202-2733
     phone:     (214)665-8036

     Chris Reiner (EPA Region 9)
     phone:     (415)744-2096
                  Mexico
Cochair:
   Adrian Fernandez Bremauntz
   Director General de Gest:6n e Informaci6n
    Ambiental
   INE-SEMARNAP
   Ave. Revoluci6n 1425
   Col. Tlacapac-San Angel
   Delegaci6n Alvaro Obreg6n
   Mexico, DF  CP01040
   phone:     (525) 624 3456
   fax:       (525)6243584

Contact:
   Luis Sanchez Catafio
 .  INE
   Ave. Revoluci6n 1425
   Col. Tlacapac-San Angel
   Delegaci6n Alvaro Obreg6h
   Mexico, DF  CP 01040
   phone:     (525) 624 3570
PROJECTS:

Project: Bilingual Pollution Prevention Manual for Selected Industrial Sectors: Wood Finishing
         Industry. Metal Finishing Industry. Electronics Industry, and Textile and Apparel Industry

Purpose: Translate pollution prevention information material into Spanish for use in maquiladora
facilities.

Funding: $30,000 per manual.

Partners: The U.S.-Mexico Pollution Prevention Workgroup is composed of representatives of EPA
Regions 6 and 9, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic  Substances, Texas Natural Resource
Conservation Commission, New  Mexico  Environment Department,  Arizona Department  of
Environmental  Quality, California Department  of Toxic  Substances Control,  and  Mexico's
environmental agency, the  Secretariat for the Environment,  Natural Resources and Fisheries
(SEMARNAP). The Workgroup members will be actively engaged in evaluating the English and
Spanish versions of the manuals and will be responsible for its distribution in their geographic areas.

Description: The U.S.-Mexico Pollution Prevention Workgroup  has developed and published three
bilingual pollution prevention manuals for use in the border area. The first manual focused on the
metal finishing industry; the second dealt with pollution prevention options and techniques for wood
October 1996
                                                                                     87

-------
Pollution Prevention Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

finishing operations; and the most recent deals with the electronics industry and is currently available.
The fourth manual will address the textile and apparel industry and is expected to be completed by
March of 1997.

Status: The electronics industry manual (both English and Spanish texts) has been approved by the
Workgroup, has been published and preliminary distribution has been made.  The textile and apparel
industry manual (English text) has been approved by the Workgroup and is in the process of being
translated into Spanish.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives: Develop additional bilingual pollution prevention manuals for
priority industrial sectors; expand assistance to maquiladoras; expand pollution prevention technical
assistance to small business operators.

Contacts: Rob Lawrence, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-2258
          Joy Tibuni, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-8036.
          Dr. Adrian Fernandez, DGGIA-INE 52 56 24 34 56
          Quim. Juan Barrera, INE


Project: Bilingual Pollution Prevention Technical Conferences

Purpose: In order to encourage the use of pollution prevention information, the Workgroup decided
to hold technical conferences for maquiladora facilities based on industrial sectors.

Funding: $30,000 per conference.

Partners: The U.S.-Mexico Pollution Prevention Workgroup is composed of representatives of EPA
Regions 6 and 9, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Texas Natural Resource
Conservation Commission,  New Mexico  Environment  Department, Arizona  Department of
Environmental Quality,  California  Department  of Toxic  Substances  Control,  and Mexico's
environmental agency,  the  Secretariat for the Environment, Natural Resources and Fisheries
(SEMARNAP). The Workgroup members will be actively engaged in promotion of and participation
in the technical conferences.

Description: Conferences on pollution prevention in the wood finishing industry and metal finishing
industry have been held.

Status: The electronics industry technical conferences were held on July 30, 1996 in El Paso and on
August 1, 1996 in Laredo.  We expect to  hold a "Pollution Prevention in the Textiles and Apparel
Industry" conference upon completion of the bilingual manual.

Relevant Border  XXI Objective:   Expand technical assistance for pollution prevention to
maquiladoras.

Contacts: Rob Lawrence, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-2258
           Joy Tibuni, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-8036.
 88
                                                                               October 1996

-------
                                              Pollution Prevention Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

 Project: Bilingual Video on Pollution Prevention as a Solution to  Compliance Problems in the
         Maquiladora Industries

 Purpose:  The purpose of this project is to develop a video that will provide visual information on
 the link between pollution prevention and compliance to compliance officials and industries on both
 sides of the border.  The video will emphasize the industrial subsectors prevalent among the
 maquiladoras, and will provide information about pollution prevention opportunities to achieve or
 exceed compliance and to resolve compliance problems.  The video will attempt to stimulate
 voluntary adoption of pollution prevention practices as a way to resolve compliance problems. Both
 English and Spanish versions will be produced.

 Funding:  $100,000.

 Partners:  EPA, Institute Nacional de Ecologia (INE) and Procuraduria Federal de Proteccion al
 Ambiente (PROFEPA).

 Description:  The video will highlight pollution prevention practices for selected  industries and
 provide basic information on the role of pollution prevention in reducing the costs of regulatory
 compliance and enforcement risks.

 Status:  Video is to  assist maquiladoras1 compliance through  voluntary auditing.  The video is
 currently being reviewed and translated into the final draft by PROFEPA.

 Relevant  Border XXI Objectives:  Expand  pollution prevention technical  assistance  to
 maquiladoras; expand pollution prevention assistance to small business  operators; and increase
 cooperation and coordination with Border XXI Workgroups.

 Contacts:  Lawrence  Sperling, EPA OECA, (202)564-7141.
           Dr. Adrian Fernandez, DGGIA - INE 5256243456
           Carlos SilvaMurillo, PROFEPA  5255898257
Project: Pollution Prevention Curriculum Conference for Students and Graduates in Engineering

Purpose:  To foster exchange  of pollution prevention curriculum  for technical colleges and
universities in order to train the scientific and technical leaders of the next generation.

Funding: $25,000.

Partners: Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC), University of Texas-Pan
American, Institute Technologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey.

Description:  A conference was held on November 30 through December 2, 1995, which focused
on the development of pollution prevention curriculum for undergraduate and graduate engineering
courses. University of Texas - Pan American's College of Engineering organized the conference to
include engineering programs from Mexico, Canada, and the United'States.   Conference goals
October 1996
                                                                                     89

-------
Pollution Prevention Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

included (1) creation of prevention-based engineering curriculum materials; (2) dissemination of
available information materials; and (3) exchange of creative problem-solving approaches.

Status:  Guideline chapters are under development and should be completed by October 1996.
Another conference is being organized to further the curriculum on pollution prevention, disseminate
available information materials and exchange creative problem-solving approaches.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:  Increase technical assistance and outreach to federal, state, and
municipal authorities, and the general public.

Contacts: Rob Lawrence, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-2258
          Joy Tibuni, EPA Region 6, (214)  665-8036
          Pierre Lichaa, TNRCC, (512) 239-3132
          Alberto Bustiani, Centre de Calidad Ambiental ITESM, 83 28 40 32
Project: Assist Mexican Pollutant Release and Transfer Registry fPRTR^

Purpose:  Develop a more standardized Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) to aid in enforcement and
compliance issues, release estimation techniques and pollution prevention.

Funding: Pending.

Partners:   EPA,  INE (Institute Nacional  de Ecologia), NJDEP (New Jersey Environment
Department).

Description:  Develop sector manuals to assist Mexican Pollutant Release and Transfer Register
(PRTR) covering the following issues:  enforcement and compliance assurance; release estimation
techniques; and pollution prevention.

Status:  Planning stages of developing of more standardized TRI manuals to aid in enforcement and
compliance issues, release estimation techniques and pollution prevention.  The scope of the services
is still being developed.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:  Initiate a Pollution Release and Transfer Registry (PRTC [RETC
in Spanish]) in Mexico and develop common information dissemination procedures and compatibility
between the Mexican PRTR and the EPA TRI.

Contacts:  Rob Lawrence, EPA, (214) 665-2258
           Luis Sanchez Catano, INE, 52 56 24 34 70 or 6 24 35 70

Project: Infrastructure Development Exchange With Mexico Technology Transfer and Capacity
        Building on Pollution Prevention

Purpose: To provide technical assistance to Mexico as it develops its pollution prevention and clean
technology programs.
90
                                                                              October 1996

-------
                                              Pollution Prevention Workgroup 1996 Implementation FJan
 Funding: $35,000 approximately annually.
 Partners:  TNRCC and Secretaria de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales, y Pesca (SEMARNAP).

 Description:  There are several components including:

 •      Provision of technical assistance to the SEMARNAP's Attorney General for the Environment
        (PROFEPA) in development of a pollution prevention focused element to the Mexican
        environmental audit program.  Assistance will be in the form of an exchange  of technical
        materials and on-site visits to industrial facilities in Texas  and Mexico by a team  of TNRCC,
        EPA and SEMARNAP technical staffs.

 •      Exchange of technical materials from U.S. environmental agencies and field visits by INE staff
        to TNRCC and other state environmental agencies with active pollution prevention programs.
        INE staff would be invited to participate in regional and/or national pollution prevention
        roundtables to study evolving U.S. programs.

 •      Training for  state governments and maquiladora associations related to developing  and
        improving workplace recycling and community recycling programs.  A major focus will be
        on the reduction  of solid waste material generation and disposal. The process will also
        identify potential markets for recyclable materials in the border region and opportunities for
        the development of recycling industries.

 Status: TNRCC and SEMARNAP have an ongoing exchange program of materials and hands-on
 experiences between the staff members engaged in pollution prevention delivery. These efforts have
 included side-by-side site  assessments of industrial facilities in the United States and Mexico.

 Relevant Border XXI Objectives:  Increase technical exchange at all levels of government to
 enhance assistance and  outreach  to  industry  and expand pollution prevention  assistance to
 maquiladoras.

 Contacts:  Rob Lawrence, EPA Region 6,  (214) 665-2258
           Joy Tibuni, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-8036
           Pierre Lichaa,  TNRCC, (512) 239-3132
           Dr. Adrian Fernandez, DIGGIA - INE (525) 624 3456
           Quim. Juan Barrera, INE
Project: Solid Waste Recycling Initiatives

Purpose: Identify ways to expand binational markets for recycled materials and commodities.

Funding: $60,000.

Partners: EPA, California Department of Toxic Substances and San Diego County.
October 1996
                                                                                     91

-------
Pollution Prevention Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Description:  The public outreach goals of the Integrated Border Environmental Plan (DBEP)
addressed the need to involve the general public in efforts to prevent illegal dumping and to foster
pollution prevention and waste reduction. With the passage of NAFTA, we would now like to look
more closely at ways to promote binational markets for recycled materials. While a great deal of
trade in recycled materials and products already occurs, the potential to expand existing markets is
enormous. This project will seek to assess current trade of recyclables across the border and identify
obstacles to expanding such trade.

Status:  Solid waste and recycling conferences were held with state and local environmental agencies.
A solid waste recycling survey is being done to determine potential markets.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives: Increase technical assistance and outreach to federal, state, and
municipal authorities, and the general public; and  develop an initiative on recycling and solid waste
handling authorities.

Contact:  Chris Reiner, EPA Region 9, (415) 744-2096.


Project: Technology Transfer and Capacity Building on Pollution Prevention with PRQFEPA

Purpose:  To provide voluntary on-site evaluation of operations to highlight opportunities for
pollution prevention implementation by Mexican  industrial facilities.

Funding:  $40,000 approximately annually.

Partners:  Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) and the Mexican Attorney
General for the Environment (PROFEPA) have  expressed interest in the  site assessments of
maquiladora facilities as conducted by the Texas Natural Resource  Conservation Commission
(TNRCC).  Over the past several years, TNRCC personnel have  made a number of pollution
prevention presentations to Mexican government officials (federal and state), consulting engineers,
and facility managers.

Description: The ADEQ/PROFEPA site assessments and the follow-up site visits would focus on
determining opportunities to implement pollution prevention and clean technology. These initial on-
site evaluations have yielded reduction of hundreds of thousands of gallons of wastewater, tons of
emissions to the air,  and transfers of hazardous waste back to the United States. The facilities have
also saved, cumulatively, over a million dollars through pollution prevention.

Status: ADEQ and SEMARNAP seek to develop an ongoing exchange program of materials and
hands-on experiences between the staff members engaged in pollution prevention delivery. These
efforts would include side-by-side site assessments of industrial facilities in the U.S. and Mexico.

Relevant Border XXI Objective:  Increase technical exchange at all  levels of government to
enhance assistance and outreach to industry.
 92
                                                                               October 1996

-------
                                              Pollution Prevention Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan
 Contact:  Chris Reiner, EPA Region 9, (415) 744-2096
           Mike Foster, ADEQ, (520) 628-6733
           Carlos Silva, PROFEPA, (525) 589-8257
 Project:   Video Conference on Permanent Pollution Prevention Program (P4) Broadcast through
           Monterrey Institute of Technology

 Purpose:   To  assist in the development of permanent pollution prevention programs with
 maquiladora industries.

 Funding:  $50,000 approximately.

 Partners:  TNRCC, Secretaria de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales, y Pesca (SEMARNAP),
 Mexican state governmental agencies.

 Description: The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) is implementing the
 Permanent Pollution Prevention Program (P4) in the El Paso area. The program is designed to
 approach pollution prevention on a regional basis.  P4 brings together several facilities, providing
 them with a framework and the technical assistance to implement permanent pollution prevention
 programs. This approach allows the pooling of knowledge and sharing of information on common
 issues  and solutions.   P4 builds industrial and governmental cooperation, assists facilities in
 developing environmental  partnerships, and fosters environmental leadership.  Previously, the
 TNRCC's Permanent Pollution Prevention Program (P4) was presented to the maquiladora industries
 through the Monterrey Institute of Technology's interactive video network which downlinks to 26
 satellite campuses throughout Mexico. Classroom instruction in pollution prevention methods could
 be augmented by on-site waste audits provided by Monterrey Tech, SEMARNAP, and TNRCC staff
 members. In addition to the provision of in-plant pollution prevention techniques, the program will
 serve as a training device for SEMARNAP inspectors and Monterrey Tech extension service
 engineers.

 Status:  The video  teleconference, held on July 14,  1995,  was attended by more than  330
 maquiladora managers and environmental managers.

 Relevant Border XXI Objectives: Expand pollution prevention assistance to maquiladoras and
 increase technical assistance and outreach to federal, state, and municipal authorities, and the general
 public.

 Contacts: Rob Lawrence, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-2258
          Joy Tibuni, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-8036
          Pierre Lichaa, TNRCC, (512) 239-3132
          Dr. Adrian Fernandez, DGGIA - INE, (525) 624-3456
          Alberto  Bustani, Centra di Calidad Ambiental, ITESM, 83 28 40 32
October 1996
                                                                                     93

-------
Pollution Prevention Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Project: Technology Transfer and Capacity Building on Pollution Prevention with PROFEPA

Purpose:  To provide voluntary on-site evaluation of operations to highlight opportunities for
pollution prevention implementation by Mexican industrial facilities.

Funding: $50,000 approximately.

Partners:  Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) and the Mexican Attorney
General for the Environment (PROFEPA) have conducted 14 site assessments of maquiladora
facilities. Over the past several years, TNRCC personnel have made a number of pollution prevention
presentations to Mexican government officials (federal and state), consulting engineers, and facility
managers.

Description: The TNRCC/PROFEPA site assessments and the follow-up site visits are focused on
determining opportunities to implement pollution prevention and clean technology. These initial on-
site technology evaluations have yielded  reductions  in hundreds  of thousands  of gallons of
wastewater, tons of emissions to the air and transfers of hazardous waste back to the United States.
The facilities have also saved, cumulatively,  over a million dollars through pollution prevention.

Status:  With 14 site assessments completed and the remarkable results being noted, SEMARNAP
is interested in expanding the availability of the program throughout Mexico.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:  Increase technical exchange at all levels of government to
enhance assistance and outreach to industry.

Contacts: Rob Lawrence, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-2258
          Joy Tibuni, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-8036
          Pierre Lichaa, TNRCC, (512) 239-3132.
Project: Border Pollution Prevention Technical Assistance - Small Business Operations

Purpose:  To address a prevalent source of volatile organic compound (VOCs) emissions which
directly impact ozone pollution in border communities; practical and common sense solutions are
being used.

Funding: $25,000 approximately.

Partners:  Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) and the Small Business
Advocate for the state of Texas.

Description:  TNRCC has built a model paint spray booth at El Paso Technical Center that is used
as a demonstration site for training operators in the auto body and paint shops industry. Operators
from the El Paso and Juarez communities are taught how to use low VOC paint spray systems and
solvent recovery and recycling machines.
94
                                                                             October 1996

-------
                                             Pollution Prevention Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Status: Over 75 operators have been trained in the use of pollution prevention techniques for this
sector of the small business community. Businesses in the lower Rio Grande Valley have expressed
an interest in having this service provided in their community.
Relevant Border XXI Objective:
businesses.
Expand pollution prevention technical assistance to small
Contacts: Rob Lawrence, EPA Region 9, (214) 665-2258
          Joy Tibuni, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-8036
          Pierre Lichaa, TNRCC, (512) 239-3132
          Tamra Oatman, TNRCC, (512) 239-1062.
Project: technical Assistance to Mexican State Environmental Agencies              >

Purpose:  To continue capacity building efforts with Mexican state environmental agencies by
providing training and technical assistance in the four Mexican states bordering Texas, in partnership
with state agencies, trade associations and universities.

Funding: $50,000 approximately.

Partners: TNRCC, Secretaria de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales, y Pesca (SEMARNAP),
Mexican state governmental agencies.

Description: The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) is currently involved
in the provision of technical assistance in the areas of development and implementation of pollution
prevention at the state level of government.   TNRCC also proposes to further this effort by
encouraging INE to develop a Mexican Pollution Prevention Roundtable, modeled on the United
States approach. The voluntary association of state university and environmental agencies provides
a forum for the exchange of information. This effort could become the model for a Pollution
Prevention Roundtable for Latin America.

Status: TNRCC and SEMARNAP have an ongoing exchange program of materials and hands-on
experiences between staff members engaged  in pollution prevention delivery. These efforts have
included side-by-side site assessments of industrial facilities in Mexico and the United States. Several
of the Mexican state environmental agencies  are interested in  adapting TNRCC programs as they
develop their environmental agendas. The border states of Tamaulipas, Nuevo Leon, Coahuila, and
Chihuahua now have  Clean Coahuila-Chihuahua programs which were  modeled after the very
successful Clean Texas 2000 initiative. Coahuila developed their own Clean Coahuila program. All
the above states will meet with TNRCC in September 1996 to develop a "Clean Border" plan.

Relevant Border XXI Objective:  Provide technical support  to Mexican state governmental
agencies in recycling and pollution prevention.

Contacts: Rob Lawrence, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-2258
          Joy Tibuni, EPA Region 6, (214) 665-8036
          Pierre Lichaa, TNRCC, (512)  239-3132.
October 1996
                                                                                     95

-------
Cooperative Enforcement Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan
                   COOPERATIVE ENFORCEMENT AND
                        COMPLIANCE WORKGROUP
                       1996 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
CONTACTS:
                    U.S.
 Cochair:
    Michael Alushin
    Director of the EPA International Enforcement and
      Compliance Division
    U.S.EPA (MC-2254-A)
    401MSt.SW
    Washington, DC 20460

 Contacts:
    Lawrence Sperling
    U.S.EPA(MC-2254-A)
    401MSt. SW
    Washington, DC 20460
    phone: (202)564-7141
    fax:   (202) 564-0073

    Efren Ordofiez (EPA Region 6)
    phone: (214)665-2181
    e-mail: ordonez.efren@epamail.epa.gov

    John Rothman (EPA Region 9)
    phone: (415)744-1353
    e-mail: rothman.john@epamail.epa.gov
                 Mexico
Cochair:
   Carlos Silva Murillo
   Director General de Asistencia Te'cnica e Industrial
   Attorney General for Environmental Protection
   Subprocuraduria de Verificaci6n Normativa
   Blvd Pipila No. 1, Tecamachalco
   Nacaulpan, Estado de Mexico, CP 53950

Contact:
   Victor Valle
   Attorney General for Environmental Protection
   Deputy Attorney for Industrial Verification
   Blvd Pipila No. 1, Tecamachalco
   Nacaulpan, Estado de Mexico, CP 53950
   phone:  (525)294-5720
   fax:    (525) 589-4398
PROJECTS:

Project:  Cooperative Targeting

Funding: PROEEPA estimates that a budget of $7.5 million (USD) is required for the operation of
the inspection programs in the northern border states, between 1996 and 2000.

EPA committed $40,000 of FY96 funds for contract support in developing and exploring cooperative
targeting methodologies. (Promotion of Interagency Cooperation).

Partners:  EPA, PROFEPA, state environmental agencies,  DOJ, U.S. and Mexican Customs
Services.

Description: EPA and PROFEPA. will address  problems in which they may coordinate their
activities within their frames of competence. The cooperative activities may be directed, for example,
at specific problems identified in the industrial sector.  To achieve the above, EPA and PROFEPA
will target efforts that will include:
96
                                                                           October 1996

-------
                                          Cooperative Enforcement Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

 •   The  sharing of information held by  one country which may assist  the other in detecting
    noncompliance with the latter's environmental regulations.

 •   The planning, programming and realization of activities necessary to assure compliance with the
 ,   laws  of the respective countries.

 •   When the country where the source of contamination is located considers it appropriate, it may
    request from the other technical support, such as information and equipment, which the other will
    provide as feasible.

 Relevant Border XXI Objectives: Continue efforts to  achieve compliance with environmental
 requirements in the border area. Establish and enhance networks of cooperation among the various
 state, local and federal agencies on both sides of the border involved in environmental enforcement
 and compliance. Promote the evolution of mechanisms to enhance the evaluation of compliance with
 environmental law.
Project: Enforcement Results Information-sharing

Funding: The cost of this activity is distributed among the other projects which implicate exchange
of information and development of reporting formats regarding compliance and'enforcement.  This
effort will be accomplished with EPA and PROFEPA staff time, with support of state environmental
agencies through EPA grants. (See Promotion of Interagency Cooperation.)

Partners: EPA, PROFEPA, state environmental agencies, DOT.

Description:  EPA and PROFEPA will conduct an annual exchange regarding enforcement activities
in the border zone, for which it will be necessary to  define the type of information and the format in
which it will be presented.

To  complement this, EPA and PROFEPA will consider, in specific cases, sharing information
regarding the nature and severity of the violations detected and the sanctions imposed. It will be
necessary to define the criteria needed to determine specific cases.

Relevant Border XXI Objective:  Develop similar systems of reporting regarding compliance and
enforcement, in  accordance with the legal framework of each party. Promote the evolution of
mechanisms to enhance the evaluation of compliance with environmental law.
Project: Training

Funding:  EPA has committed $90,000 ofFY96 funds for contract support, plus support from states
and regional environmental enforcement associations funded by EPA through grants and cooperative
agreements  (See Promotion of Interagency Cooperation.)  In the area of hazardous waste
enforcement, the Enforcement Workgroup will work jointly with the Hazardous Waste Workgroup
to organize specific courses or workshops.  (See Hazardous Waste Workgroup 1996 Implementation
October 1996
                                                                                     97

-------
Cooperative Enforcement Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Plan.)  The approximate cost to Mexico for carrying out this activity is calculated to be $100,000
USD, between 1996 and 2000.

Partners:  EPA, PROFEPA, regional environmental enforcement associations, state and local
environmental agencies, DOT, Cal-DTSC, ADEQ, NMED, TNRCC, San Diego County Health
Department, U.S. and Mexican Customs, DOT, SCT, CNA, CICOPLAFEST.

Description:

•  Transboundary Hazardous Waste Shipment Compliance Training for Customs and Environmental
   Inspectors — EPA and PROFEPA will continue to work together to deliver this course at the
   primary customs facilities established along the U.S.-Mexico border. Goals will include involving
   inspectors on both sides of the border as instructors,  and promoting  cooperative interaction
   among customs and environmental inspectors from both countries.

   Time frame: Provide courses in a systematic manner.

•  Training to Detect Possible CFC Smuggling -- EPA and PROFEPA will  develop and deliver
   courses for environmental inspectors and customs agents of both countries to detect possible
   illegal shipments of CFCs.

   Time frame: Ongoing.                                          .

•  Multimedia Inspector Training -- EPA and PROFEPA will continue training inspectors with the
   participation of instructors from PROFEPA, and the next courses will include water quality
   inspection information.

   Time frame: Ongoing.         ,

•  Principles of Environmental  Enforcement Workshop -- EPA and PROFEPA will explore
   additional presentations of this workshop in one or more border states of northern  Mexico,
   integrating previous participants as workshop facilitators.  EPA and PROFEPA will explore the
   possibility of working together to present this workshop to Central or South American countries
   (or inviting them to participate in future workshops in Mexico).

   Time frame:  Ongoing. EPA and PROFEPA will develop a proposal to the World Bank to finance
   courses in northern Mexico.

•  Field Investigations and Sampling — In cooperation with the Hazardous Waste Workgroup, EPA
   and PROFEPA will explore the development of workshops or courses in the conduct of field
   investigation and taking of samples.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:  Continue efforts to achieve compliance with environmental
requirements in the border area,  particularly through institutionalized national training programs.
Establish and enhance networks of cooperation among the various state, local, and federal agencies
on both sides of the border involved in environmental enforcement and compliance.
98
                                                                            October 1996

-------
                                         Cooperative Enforcement Workgroup 1996 Implementation P)an
Project:  Technical and Legal Consultations
Funding: EPA and PROFEPA relying on in-house personnel.  State and regional environmental
enforcement association participation to be assisted through EPA grants.  (See Promotion of
Interagency Cooperation.)  PROFEPA estimates its cost for this activity to be $300,000 USD,
between 1996 and 2000.

Partners:  EPA, PROFEPA, DOJ, state environmental agencies and regional environmental
enforcement associations, U.S. Customs Service, Environmental Law institute, U.S. Attorney.

Description:

•  Policies regarding enforcement of the environmental laws and regulations -- EP A and PROFEPA
   will hold a conference for technical and legal enforcement personnel of the Mexican and U.S.
   governments considering legal and technical aspects involved in enforcing their environmental
   laws and regulations.  The conference will be based on case studies developed by the participants
   of the conference.

   Time frame: Conference occurred July 1996. Follow-up being explored.

•  Improvement of Enforcement Data Systems — EPA and PROFEPA will continue the technical
   consultations regarding enforcement and compliance data systems management, in coordination
   with Canada and the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC).

   Time frame:  To be defined in the next meetings of the CEC.

•  Calculation of Economic Sanctions — EPA and PROFEPA will conduct a technical consultation
   regarding methodologies of both countries to calculate economic sanctions.

•  Criminal Environmental Enforcement — EPA and PROFEPA will continue consultations regarding
   criminal environmental law enforcement.

   Time frame:  Ongoing. TNRCC to invite PROFEPA to participate in an environmental crimes
   training course.  At TNRCC's invitation PROFEPA participated in an environmental crimes
   training course in Austin in May 1996.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:   Continue efforts  to achieve compliance with environmental
requirements in the border area. Establish and enhance networks of cooperation among the various
agencies  involved in environmental enforcement  and compliance.  Develop similar systems of
reporting regarding enforcement and compliance,  within the legal framework of each party. Promote
evolution of mechanisms to enhance evaluation of compliance with environmental law. Promote
pollution prevention as a mechanism for solving compliance problems.
October 1996
                                                                                    99

-------
Cooperative Enforcement Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

Project: Case-specific Investigations

Funding: EPA and PROEEPA relying on in-house personnel.  State and local agency participation
to be assisted through EPA grants.  (See Promotion of Interagency Cooperation.)  PROFEPA
estimates the cost for the operation of this project to be $62,500 USD, between 1996 and 2000.

Partners: EPA, PROFEPA, DOJ, state environmental agencies, U.S. and Mexican Customs, U.S.
Attorney.

Description:

•  Case-by-case  Cooperation  ~ EPA  and PROFEPA will continue to  cooperate in specific
   enforcement cases, including the participation of the existing regional subgroups.

•  Protocol for  Cooperation  in Investigations ~ In  cooperation with the  Hazardous Waste
   Workgroup, EPA and PROFEPA will explore the possibility of establishing a protocol for
   cooperation in the development of evidence for enforcement cases of each country, including
   exchange of information, sampling and analysis, and provision of legal testimony to give basis to
   legal proceedings.

   Time frame: Ongoing. EPA and PROFEPA to define the process and time frame for concluding
   the protocol.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:  Continue efforts to achieve compliance with environmental
requirements in the border area.  Establish and enhance networks of cooperation among the various
agencies involved in environmental  enforcement and compliance;  promote the establishment of
subgroups for  each geographic  region, to enhance multiagency binational  cooperation and identify
priorities for regional enforcement cooperation; promote the participation of the representatives of
the different competent agencies, through the coordinators  of the border subgroups, to explore
solutions to specific environmental problems.
Project: Promotion of Interagency Cooperation

Funding:  In FY96, EPA provided $325,000 in direct grants to state agencies and $20,000 in
cooperative agreement funding to regional environmental enforcement associations to support border
area enforcement activities. PROFEPA estimates that the approximate cost of this project will be
$37,500 USD, between 1996 and 2000.

Partners: EPA, PROFEPA, DOJ, U.S. and Mexican Customs, DOT, SCT, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, state and local environmental and public health agencies, U.S. state Attorney General.

Description:  EPA and PROFEPA will work to improve the coordination  among  the state and
federal agencies on both sides of the border involved in enforcement of environmental  legislation, in
accordance with the attributes which have been conferred to them and their resources. To facilitate
these efforts, EPA and PROFEPA have established regional subgroups for El Paso-Juarez and
California-Baja California, and will analyze  the possibility of creating additional subgroups, in
100
                                                                             October 1996

-------
                                         Cooperative Enforcement Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

accordance with the availability of human and financial resources.  The 1996 workplan for the El
Paso-Juarez subgroup is included as an appendix to this Plan.  The Mexican Section of BBWC and
the National Water Commission (CNA) will be invited to participate in the Cooperative Enforcement
Strategy Workgroup's efforts.  The workgroup will work with the Hazardous Waste Workgroup to
improve field coordination of customs officials of both countries, and will develop multiagency task
forces to ensure compliance with the regulations regarding transboundary shipments.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives:  Continue efforts to  achieve compliance with environmental
requirements in the border area. Establish and enhance networks of cooperation among the various
agencies involved in environmental enforcement and compliance; promote the establishment of
subgroups for each geographic region, to enhance multiagency binational cooperation and identify
priorities for regional enforcement cooperation; promote the participation of the representatives of
the different competent agencies, through the  coordinators of the border subgroups, to explore
solutions to specific environmental problems.
Project:  Environmental Auditing and Voluntary Compliance

Funding:  $85,000 in EPA FY96 funds for contract  support.  PROFEPA estimates that the
approximate cost of this program would be $100,000 USD, between 1996 and 2000.

Partners:  EPA,, PROFEPA,  state environmental agencies, regional environmental enforcement
networks, industry associations.

Description:

•  Industry Outreach/Promotion — EPA and PROFEPA will continue the efforts initiated in 1994
   to provide information to U.S. parent corporations of Mexican industries regarding, and stimulate
   their participation in, PROFEPA's environmental auditing programs.  EPA and PROFEPA will
   expand their coordinated efforts to promote voluntary compliance in industrial sectors, including
   by means of environmental auditing and the  adoption of pollution  prevention practices and
   technologies as solutions to problems of compliance. Such efforts will  include industry seminars
   and workshops to promote  environmental auditing.

   Time  frame:  EPA to  send a letter to the U.S. parent companies previously approved by
   PROFEPA promoting their voluntary participation in PROFEPA's environmental auditing
   program. Subject to the allocation of additional resources, EPA and PROFEPA will explore the
   possibility of developing a third conference on voluntary compliance by means of environmental
   auditing.

•  Government Consultations  — EPA and PROFEPA, in coordination with Canada and the CEC,
   will continue with mutual technical consultations regarding their respective programs and policies
   for environmental auditing as a tool to assure voluntary  compliance and promote pollution
   prevention.

   Time frame: An intergovernmental meeting occurred August 1996. Follow-up being pursued.
October 1996
101

-------
Cooperative Enforcement Workgroup 1996 Implementation Plan

•  Production of Video on Pollution Prevention and Compliance -- In coordination with the
   Pollution Prevention Workgroup, EPA is to complete production of a video, "Environmental
   Auditing and Pollution Prevention: Strategies for Voluntary Compliance  in the Maquiladora
   Industry."  The video will include a focus on environmental auditing as a tool to assure
   compliance and identify pollution prevention opportunities. EPA and PROFEPA will discuss
   possible uses of the video in compliance promotion efforts.

   Time frame: PROFEPA will provide EPA comments on the preliminary version of the video.
   Final revisions and distribution of the video in 1997 are subject to allocation of additional
   resources.

Relevant Border XXI Objectives: Encourage voluntary compliance by industry through strategies,
such  as environmental auditing and the use  of clean technologies and less-contaminating raw
materials, as a complement to a strong program of law enforcement.  Promote pollution prevention
as a mechanism for solving compliance problems. Promote public participation within the legal
framework of each party.
102
                                                                              October 1996

-------
ACAAN
ADEQ
ADHS
ADWR
AGFD
AID
APHIS
ASU
ATSDR

BANDAN
BBS
BECC
BHO
BLM
BMP
BOR
BRD

Cal-DTSC
CAMEO
CARB
CCA
CCPC
CDC
CDFG
CDHS
CEAS

CEC
CEQ
CERCLIS

CES
CESPM

CFC
CFP
CICA
CICOPLAFEST
CICTUS

CIDESON

CIESIN
CILA
CITES
CLAM
Glossary of Abbreviations

 Acuerdo de Cooperation Ambiental del Norte (see NAAEC)
 Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
 Arizona Department of Health Services
 Arizona Department of Water Resources
 Arizona Game and Fish Department
 U.S. Agency for International Development
 Agriculture Pest Health Inspection Service
 Arizona State University
 Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry

 Banco para el Desarollo de America del Norte (see NADBank)
 Bulletin Board System
 Border Environment Cooperation Commission (see COCEF)
 Border Health Office                                         ,
 Bureau of Land Management
 Best Management Practices
 Bureau of Reclamation
 Biological Resources Division of USGS

 California Department of Toxic Substances Control
 Computer aided Management of Emergency Operations
 California Air Resources Board
 Comision de Cooperation Ambiental de America del Norte (see CEC)
 Comite Consultivo Publico Conjunto de la CCA (see JPAC)
 Centers for Disease Control
 California Department of Fish and Game
 California Department of Health Services
 Comision Estatal de Aguas y Saneamiento de Coahuila (Coahuila State
  Commission for Water and Sanitation)
 Commission for Environmental Cooperation (see CCA)
 Council on Environmental Quality
 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act.
   Information System
 Centre Ecologico de Sonora (Sonora Ecological Center)
 Comite Estatal de Servicios Piiblicos de Mexicali (State Committee for Public
 Services of Mexicali)
 Chlorofluorocarbons
 Cooperative Fisheries Program
 U.S.-Mexico Information Center on Air Pollution
 Comision InterSecretarial para el  Control de Plaguicidas, Fertilizantes y Subtancias
   Toxicas (Interagency Commission for Control of Pesticides, Fertilizers and Toxic
   Substances)
 Centra de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnologicas (Center for Scientific and
   Technological Research)
 Centre de Investigation y Desarollo de Sonora (Sonora Center for Research and
   Development)
 Consortium for International Earth Sciences Information Network
 Comision International de Limites y Aguas (see IBWC)
 Convention on International Trade for Endangered Species
 Comite Local para Ayuda Mutua (Local Committee for Mutual Assistance)
October 1996
                                                            Glossary 103

-------
Glossary of Abbreviations
CNA
CO
COAPES

COCEF
COLEF
CONABIO

CONACYT

COSAE

CWS
Comision National de Agua (National Water Commission)
Carbon monoxide
Comision de Agua Potable y Alcantarillado del Estado de Sonora (Sonora State
  Commision for Drinking Water and Sewers)
Comision de Cooperation Ecologico Fronterizo (see BECC)
El Colegio de la Frontera Norte (College of the Northern Border)
Comision Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (National
  Commission for Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity)
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (National Advisory Council for Science
  and Technology)
Comision de Servicios de Agua del Estado de Baja California (Water Utilities
  Commission for the State of Baja California)
Canadian Wildlife Service
DEM
DFG
DGPS
DIAAPROY

DLG
DOC
DOD
DOE
DOI
DOT
DOQ
DOS
DOT
DRGs
DUMAC

EOF
EJ
EPA
EPA/OW
EPAR6
EPAR9
EPCCHED
EPOMEX
FCC
FDA
FONSI
FWS
FY

GCD

GGA
GIS
Digital elevation model
Department of Fish and Game (California)
Differential Geographic Positioning System
Diseno, Asesoria, y Administration de Proyectos, S.A. de C.V. (Project Design,
  Assistance, and Management, Inc.)
Digital line graph
U.S. Department of Commerce
U.S. Department of Defense
U.S. Department of Energy
U.S. Department of Interior
U.S. Department of Justice
Digital ortho-quadrangles
U.S. Department of State
U.S. Department of Transportation
Digital raster graphics
Ducks Unlimited de Mexico, A.C.

Environmental Defense Fund
Environmental Justice
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Office of Water
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Region 6
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Region 9
El Paso City and County Health and Environment Department
Programa de Ecologia, Pesca, y Oceanografia del Golfo de Mexico (Gulf of
Mexico Program for Ecology, Fisheries, and Oceanography)

U.S. Field Coordinating Committee (DOI)
Food and Drug Administration
Finding of No  Significant Impact
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fiscal Year

Grupo Coordinador Estatal del Proyecto de Descentralizacion (State
  Coordinating Group for the Decentralization Project)
Grupo de Gestion Ambiental Estatal (State Environmental Management Group)
Geographical Information Systems
Glossary 104
                                                                                  October 1996

-------
                                                                            Glossary of Abbreviations
GNEB
GPS

HAZTRAKS
HHS
HMMD
HRSA
HUD

IB
IBEP

IBWC
ICC
ICMA
IID
IMADES
IMSS
INAH

Inc.
INE
INEGI

INIFAP

INP
ISO 14000

ISSSTE

ITESM

IWMB
IWRC
IWTP

JCP
JMAS

JPAC
JRT

LEPC
LIDAR
LOI
Ips

MEXUS
Good Neighbor Environmental Board
Global Positioning System

Hazardous Waste Tracking System
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
County of San Diego - Hazardous Materials Management Division
Health Resources and Services Administration
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Instituto de Biologia, UNAM (Biology Institute, UNAM)
Integrated Border Environmental Plan, Integrated Environmental Plan for the
  U.S.-Mexico Border Area, First Stage (1992-94) (see PIAF)
International Boundary and Water Commission (see CILA)
Interagency Coordinating Committee
International City/County Management Association
Imperial Irrigation District
Instituto del Medio Ambiente y el Desarollo Sustentable del Estado de Sonora (State
  of Sonora Institute for the Environment and Sustainable Development) - formed
  through the joining of CIDESON and CES
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (Mexican Institute for Social Security)
Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia (National Institute for Anthropology
  and History
Incorporated (see S.A. de C.V.)
Instituto Nacional de Ecologia (National Institute for Ecology)
Institutd'Nacional de Estadistica, Geografia, e Informatica (National Institute for
  Statistics, Geography, and Information)
Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricola y Pecuaria (National
  Institute for Investigations of Forests, Agriculture and Livestock)
Instituto Nacional de Pesca (National Institute of Fisheries)
International Standards Organization 14000 (14000 is a series of standards  on
  environmental management)
Instituto de Seguridad Social y Servicios para los Trabajadres del Estado
  (Institute for Social Security & Services for State Workers)
Instituto Tecnologico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (Technology Institute of
  Superior Studies of Monterrey)
Integrated Waste Management Board
Iowa Waste Reduction Center
International Wastewater Treatment Plant

Joint Contingency Plan
Junta Municipial de Alcantarillado y Saneamiento de Ciudad Juarez (Sewer and
  Sanitation Municipal Authority for Ciudad Juarez)
Joint Public Advisory Committee for the CEC (see CCPC)
Joint Response Team

Local Emergency Planning Committee
Light, intensity, distancing, and ranging
Letter of intent
Liters per second

MOU on fisheries investigation between Mexico and the U.S. for the Gulf of
  Mexico and the Pacific Ocean
October 1996
                                                                Glossary 105

-------
Glossary of Abbreviations
MMS
MOU

NAAEC
NAAQS
NADBank
NAFTA
NAS
NASQAN
NAWCC
NAWQAP
NBEP
NBII
NGO
NIEHS
NIH
NIWTP
NJDEP
NMBHO
NMDFG
NMDOH
NMED
NMFS
NM-GIC
NMSU
NOAA
NOS
NOx
NPS
NRCS
NTDs
NVVR

03
OCRM
ONG
OPS
OWM

P2
PAFN
PAH
PAHO
Pb
PCS
PEMEX
PHS
PM-10
PND
PROFAUNA
U.S. Minerals Management Service
Memorandum of Understanding

North American Agreement on Evironmental Cooperation (see ACAAN)
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
North American Development Bank (see BANDAN)
North American Free Trade Agreement (see TLC)
National Audubon Society
National Stream Quality Accounting Network
North American Waterfowl Conservation Commission
National Water Quality Assessment Program
Northern Border Evironmental Program (see PAFN)
National Biological Information Infrastructure
Nongovernmental organization
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
National Institute of Health
Nogales International Wastewater Treatment Plant
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
New Mexico Border Health Office
New Mexico Department of Fish and Game
New Mexico Department of Health
New Mexico Environment Department
National Marine Fisheries Service
New Mexico Geographic Information Council
New Mexico State University
U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
U.S. National Ocean Service
Oxides of Nitrogen.
National Park Service
U.S. Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service
Neural tube defects
National Wildlife Refuge

Ozone
Ocean and Coastal Resource  Management
Organizaciones no Gubernamentales (see NGO)
Organization Panamericana para la Salud (see PAHO)
Office of Wastewater Management

Pollution Prevention/Prevention de la Contamination
Programa Ambiental de la Frontera Norte (see NBEP)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Pan American Health Organization (see OPS)
Lead
Permit and Compliance System
Petroleps Mexicanos (Mexican Petroleum Company)
Public Health Service
Particulate matter (size = less than 10 microns)
Plan National de Desarollo (Mexico's National Development Plan)
Asociacion para la Protection de la Fauna, A.C. (Association for the Protection of
  Wildlife)
Glossary 106
                                                            October 1996

-------
                                                                           Glossary of Abbreviations
PROFEPA

PRTR
PSU

QA/QC

RMRS
RTP
RWQCB

S.A. de C.V.
SAGAR

SAHOPE

SARH

SCT

SCERP
SE
SDSU
SEAGO
SEDESOL
SEDUE

SEMARNAP

SFFS

SIP
SIUE

SO2
SRE
SRN

SSA
SWRCB

TB
TDH
TOPS
Texas (STEP)
TGLO
TIGER
TLC
TNRCC
TNRIS
TPWD
TRI
Procuraduria Federal de Protection al Ambiente (Federal Attorney General for
  Environmental Protection)
Pollution Release and Transfer Registry
Pennsylvania State University

Quality Assurance/Quality Control

Rocky Mountain Research Station
Research Triangle Park
Regional Water Quality Control Board

Sociedad Anonima de Capital Variable (see Inc.)
Secretaria de Agriculture, Ganaderia, y Desarollo Rural (Mexican Secretariat for
  Agriculture, Cattle, and Rural Development)
Secretaria de Asentamientos Humanos y Obras Publicas del Estado (Baja California
  State Secretariat for Human Housing and Public Works)
Secretaria de Agricultura y Recursos Hidraulicos (Mexican Secretariat for
  Agriculture and Hydraulic Resources)
Secretaria de Comunicaciones y Transportes  (Mexican Secretariat of
  Communication and Transportation)
Southwest Center for Environmental Research and Policy
Secretariat of Energy
San Diego State University
Southeastern Arizona Governments Organization
Secretaria de Desarollo Social (Mexico's Secretary for Social Development)
Secretaria de Desarollo Urbano y Ecologia (Mexican Secretary for Urban
  Development and Ecology)
Secretaria de Medio Ambiente Recursos Naturales y Pesca (Mexico's Secretary for
  the Environment, Natural Resources, and Fisheries)
Subsecretaria Forestal y de la Fauna Silvestre (Subsecretariat for Forestry and
  Wildlife)
State Implementation Plan
Secretaria de Infraestrucura Urbana y Ecologia, Sonora (Secretary for Urban
  Infrastructure and Ecology, Sonora)
Sulfur dioxide
Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores - (Mexico's Secretariat for External Affairs)
Subsecretaria de Recursos Naturales, (Undersecretariat for Natural
  Resources, under SEMARNAP)
Secretaria de Salud (Mexico's Secretary of Health)
State Water Resources Control Board (California)

Tuberculosis
Texas Department of Health
Texas Department of Public Safety
Texas Small Towns Environment Program
Texas General Land Office
Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing
Tratado de Libre Comercio (see NAFTA)
Texas Natural  Resource Conservation Commission
Texas Natural  Resource Information System
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
Toxics Release Inventory
 October 1996
                                                                Glossary 107

-------
Glossary of Abbreviations
TRIP
TSP
TWDB
TX-GISPC

UAAAN

UABC

UACH
UAG

UAM
UANL
UAS
UAT
UCANP

UCAI

UCD
UNAM

UNISON
UNM
UNT
UofA
USAGE
USD
USDA
USFS
USGS
USMBHA
UT
UTA
UT-BEG
UTEP
UofU

VOCs

WEF
WGA
Transboundary Resource Inventory Project
Total suspended participates
Texas Water Development Board
Texas Geographic Information Systems Planning Council

Universidad Autonoma Agraria Antonio Narro (Antonio Narro Autonomous
  Agrarian University)
Universidad Autonoma de Baja California (Autonomous University of Baja
  California)
Universidad Autonoma de Chihuahua (Autonomous University of Chihuahua)
Universidad Autonoma de Guadalajara (Autonomous University of
  Guadalajara)
Universidad Autonoma Metropolitania (Autonomous Metropolitan University)
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon (Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon)
Universidad Autonoma de Sonora
Universidad Autonoma de Tamauli'pas
Unidad Coordinadora de Areas Naturales Protegidas, INE (Division of
  Coordination of Natural Protected Areas)
Unidad de Coordination de Asuntos Internacionales, SEMARNAP (Office of
  Coordination of International Activities)
University of California at Davis
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (Autonomous National University of
  Mexico)
Universidad de Sonora (University of Sonora)
University of New Mexico
University of North Texas
University of Arizona
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
United States Dollars
U.S. Department of Agriculture
U.S. Forest Service
U.S. Geological Survey
U,S.-Mexico Border Health Association
University of Texas
University of Texas at Austin
University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology
University of Texas at El Paso
University of Utah

Volatile organic compounds

Water Environment Federation
Western Governors Association
Glossary 108
                                                            October 1996

-------