SUMMARY
WHITE HOUSE BRIEFING
& CONFERENCE ON
ENVIRONMENTAL
TECHNOLOGIES
-------
-------
CONTENTS
Overview
Remarks by Vice-President Al Gore
The Briefing
Dr. John H. Gibbons
Hazel O'Leary
Fred Hansen
Brian Atwood
Sherri Goodman
Ralph Peterson
Livio DeSimone
Assistant to the President for Science and Technology
Secretary of Energy
Deputy Administrator, EPA
Administrator, Agency for International Development
Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Environmental
Security, Department of Defense
President & CEO, CH2MHill
Chairman of the Board & CEO, 3M Company
The Roundtables
Regulatory Reinvention for Technology Innovation
Building and Improving R&D Partnerships
Building Federal Facility Partnerships
Financing Environmental Technologies
Developing International Markets: From Capacity Building to Exports
The Participants
-------
-------
Overview
The global market for environmental goods and services is now estimated at $400 billion
and is expected to grow to $600 billion by the year 2010.Though the opportunities for U.S.
companies are significant, the competition for this burgeoning market is fierce.Competing
successfully will require creating and maintaining long-term partnerships and building an
entrepreneur-friendly policy environment which helps U.S. industry turn good ideas into
innovations and marketable products.
The White House Briefing and Conference on Environmental Technologies, held on April
30, 1996, brought together 200 representatives from industry, the federal government, and other
key sectors to discuss how to facilitate the future development and deployment of environmentally-
critical processes, products, and practices, both here and abroad.This event built on the
commitment made in the National Environmental Technology Strategy to find new ways to expand
the economy while improving environmental quality.The goal of the national strategy was to
strengthen the policies and partnerships between the public and private sectors needed to
encourage innovation and investment in environmentally-sound technologies, products, and
practices, both here and abroad.
The all-day event included a morning briefing for all participants which provided an
overview of the National Environmental Technology Strategy, a review of key federal
environmental technology programs, and an analysis of budgets and funding issues.The briefing
ended with an industry perspective on the competitive implications of environmental technologies
and the role of government programs and public-private partnerships in advancing these
technologies.The briefing was followed by five concurrent roundtables, co-chaired by private and
public sector leaders, that were convened to delineate specific recommendations needed to sustain
a environmental technology development agenda. Each roundtable develop a short list of action
items which were presented by the co-chairs to the Vice-President at the end of the day before the
assembled conference.This report is a record of the conference and the associated
recommendations that were taken under advisement by the Vice-President.
-------
-------
Remarks by
VICE PRESIDENT AL GORE
[AS PREPARED]
I would like to thank those members of the Administration and those participants
ftom industry, NGO's, and state and local government who have come together today to work
on an issue of national importance. I am anxious to hear your recommendations on how we
can advance the development and deployment of mvironmental technologies, but I would like
to begin by sharing with you a few observations.
As most of you in this room know, it has been a particularly difficult year for
environmental policy and those who make it. This was a year when some members of this
Congress:
- asserted that DDT was not harmful,
- compared the EPA with the gestapo, and,
- maintained that the science underlying the CFC ban is debatable ~ this just 2 weeks
after the scientists who discovered the relationship between CFC's and ozone depletion
were awarded the Nobel prize in chemistry.
But despite the battles, the rhetoric and counterproductive detours, I believe that
historians will look back on the last year as a critical point in the evolution of environmental
policy. Let me explain why.
First, all attempts to turn back the clock on environmental protection failed. This was not
only a triumph of science over ignorance, but a triumph of democracy and public interest over
vested interests.
Second, despite frontal attacks on both environmental policies and budgets, this
Administration was able to put hi place the building blocks of a new system of environmental
protection and management. We are doing that with programs such as XL and the Common
Sense Initiative.
Third, the number of companies who are pursuing environmental excellence as a competitive
strategy has now reached a critical mass and we are in a unique position to redefine
environmental management together in a way which has enormous competitive implications
for U.S. industry. 3M pioneered this approach over a decade ago with its "Pollution
Prevention Pays" program and it is increasingly becoming a key part of business strategy in
many companies.
-------
Finally, international activities stimulated through Agenda 21 and other mechanisms have
ramped up the demand for better environmental protection, policies, and technologies at a
global level, creating new opportunities for both learning and commerce.
Those are all positive trends which provide significant .opportunities over the coming months
and years.
However, creating a new environmental paradigm which effectively builds on our past
successes will not be inexpensive or easy. It will require sustained and combined investment
from both the public and private sectors in research needed to develop a new generation of
environmentally-critical technologies. It will require a new set of performance-based metrics,
a new generation of measurement systems, and a wide-spread and credible capacity to audit
performance. It will require a combined public and private sector focus on results rather than
methods, on good management practices, and on continuous and rapid improvements in
process efficiencies and product performance. And it will require a high level of openness
and trust between industry, government, and communities. In short, we will need a massive
investment in "social" capital to move us beyond the confrontational and litigious legacy of
the command-and-control era.
The stakes are high. It would be a mistake on our part to think that the U.S. is alone
in the endeavor to rebuild the system of environmental management. Other countries,
Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, the European Union as a whole, have aggressive and
well-funded programs to reinvent their approaches to environmental protection. Their
rationale is like ours: better environmental protection at lower costs and competitive
positioning for their industries.
Alan Kay at Apple Computer once noted that: "The best way to predict the future is
to invent it" That is our only option.
Do we want to sit by while a few misguided people in the Congress compromise our ability
to invest in research necessary to developing a new generation of environmental technologies?
Do we want to walk away from a 400-billion dollar global market for environmental goods
and services which in growing at rates exceeding 10 percent per year in many developing
countries?
Do we want to turn our backs on an opportunity to build a new system of environmental
management which can drive innovation and mobilize capital for decades to come?
Do we want to give up the chance to remake the relationship between government, industry,
and the public after years of distrust and litigation around environmental issues?
I think the answer to these questions is no. Those of you in this room can help us invent the
future.
-------
The Briefing
John H. Gibbons
Assistant to the President for Science and Technology
In the early 1970's, the government set the national regulatory framework which would
shape an entire generation of environmental technologies. By defining the rules of the game we
effectively defined the nature and rate of technological development, directed capital flows, and
shaped environmental markets for decades. Three years ago, this Administration set out to rebuild
this framework, to make sure our environmental policies provide a competitive advantage to
industry, not a competitive burden, and are optimized for environmental performance, for
technological excellence, for social equity, and for economic competitiveness.
In July 1994, the Vice President asked us to put the best minds in this country together
to think about how we could advance the development and deployment of environmentally-sound
processes, products, and practices, both here and abroad. In a series of more than two dozen
events held across the United States, we met with over 10,000 representatives from industry,
academia, NGO's, and state and local government to discuss how to advance the development
and deployment of environmental technologies. The result of this work was the National
Environmental Technology Strategy released during Earth Week, 1995. As part of that strategy
we are working to reinvent the regulatory system, help verify and demonstrate environmental
technologies, support R&D on environmentally-critical technologies, help businesses move
environmental technologies into foreign markets, and in general, build a more responsive,
integrated, and consistent system of programs and policies. We .hope to use this conference to
advance our strategy, to identify any bottlenecks ~ technological, organizational, or financial --
which stand in our way and develop effective ways to deal with these obstacles.
We stand at a crossroads of environmental policy. The choices we make over the next
months and years will drive environmental innovation far into the next century. Budgets for many
key environmental technology programs are under attack in the Congress. However, this
Administration remains committed to environmental technology programs and to achieving both
economic and environmental protection goals while meeting our budget deficit reduction targets.
We will work with all relevant stakeholder to make sure this-happens.
-------
Hazel O Leary
Secretary of Energy
All nations of the world are facing unprecedented economic and environmental challenges.
As^with all great challenges, however, there are also great opportunities. The environmental
technology market is a multi-billion dollar opportunity and growing rapidly. For the countries
and companies that seize this opportunity, the result can be significant social, economic and other
advantages, not the least of which is high paying jobs. Our challenge is to figure how we can
work together to make sure that the US keeps its lead in this exploding marketplace.
Many US companies are ahead of the curve and reaping the direct benefits of the
environmental technology market. Other forward-looking companies that include users as well
as developers of some of these technologies ~ 3M, Weyerhauser, DOW and others ~ are leading
the way in environmentally-friendly operations. These latter companies are proving that
businesses that are well managed, reduce wastes, cut emissions and prevent incidents will succeed
in tomorrow s global markets.
At DOE, many of our pollution prevention and environmental technologies R&D programs
are yielding the same kinds of rewards. For example, wind, photovoltaics and biofuels have
been made significantly more cost-effective as a result of DOE technology investments. A GAO
audit of our programs showed that returns from just five technologies more than paid for the
entire Energy Efficiency budget from 1978-1996 - and that s just the return attributable to the
federal contribution. We have great expectations for our ongoing partnerships with industry, such
as the Industries of the Future project, and it is encouraging that entire industries are seizing their
own opportunities. Restructuring of the electricity industry will also provide a large opportunity
for utilities to become more efficient and to provide additional environmental benefits.
Against this backdrop, we may be about to squander the lead that the US has built in
tomorrows technologies, even with this substantial track record and a citizenry that demands
a clean, healthy, and sustainable world. Congress is proposing drastic cuts in areas such as
energy efficiency and pollution prevention technologies, advanced transportation technologies,
and many other relevant R&D programs. While the .U.S. is cutting back, our international
competitors are increasing both private and public investments in environmental technology.
This Administration has done a remarkable thing: it has made us work together towards
common goals, and it has been consistent about what those goals are. We have created millions
of new jobs and expanded the economy while preserving and improving the environment. We
must continue this work together. We must develop the needed technologies, reinvent our
regulations to stimulate innovation, build partnerships and use our federal facilities as testbeds
and innovation incubators. We must design policies and programs that help capitalize on the
huge export market and we must design ways of stimulating the investment that we need. As
an administration, we believe that we can prosper economically only if we take care of ourselves
and our planet, and we can take care of our planet only if we prosper economically.
-------
Fred Hansen
Deputy Administrator
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPA is committed to reinventing the regulatory framework to reach our national
environmental goals. Some people have interpreted our drive for reinvention to mean more
flexibility within the current regulatory system. And that s partly true. Others think reinvention
means more incentives for developing cheaper, more efficient ways to prevent or control
pollution. And that s also partly true. But reinvention is more than flexibility and efficiency.
It s a new way of thinking about the future ~ of reaching the future. That future is a place
where the environmental protection system implements itself, where companies continually
improve their environmental performance.
There will always be a role for government in addressing environmental problems and
ensuring the compliance of those not willing to do so on their own. But we want to work
towards an environmental protection system that encourages continuous improvement, where the
issue is no longer simply compliance, but moving steadily beyond compliance. All of us want
to create a new system that takes us into the 21st century. But innovation isn t free. We need
to invest both public and private resources. EPA wants to continue working with state and local
governments to make these needed investments in the future.
The Administration s environmental technology efforts are being integrated across the
federal government. The new ideas that we re testing and supporting at EPA complement the
initiatives underway at other agencies. In 1994, at the first White House Conference on
Environmental Technology, we stated that we were changing our approach to environmental
protection. Since that time, we ve worked with our public and private stakeholders to provide
new tools and models for encouraging innovation. For example, we have established the
Environmental Technology Verification Program to verify the performance of innovative
technologies and move them into the marketplace. Under Project XL, we have more than 40
pending pilot proposals that would do away with certain regulatory requirements in exchange for
better performance. EPA is working with all of our stakeholders to implement a performance-
based system for better environmental protection.
-------
Brian Atwood
Administrator
U.S. Agency for International Development
By helping the developing world meet its needs via more environmentally responsible
means, we can work to ameliorate global environmental problems and expand markets for U.S.
environmental technologies at the same time. Developing countries represent the fastest growing
markets for U.S. exports, and as these countries modernize, their demand for U.S. goods will
continue to increase. In the environmental area, the global market for goods and services is
estimated to be $400 billion, 60% of which lies outside of the U.S. This market is expected to
double in coming decades with developing countries making up the largest part of the growth.
Massive opportunities will present themselves in the areas of industrial pollution prevention,
energy efficiency, renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, forestry and coastal zone
management, preservation of biodiversity, and improved urban infrastructure services such as
water and solid waste management.
Last year we provided $700 million in environmental technical assistance and training in
Asia, Latin America, Africa, Central Europe and the Newly Independent States. Our leadership
role in steering the developing world toward environmentally sound and responsible development
paths must continue. Not only do we benefit the citizens of developing countries in terms of
improved quality of life, we benefit our own country economically. All these lessen global
environmental deterioration, an ever-increasing threat as the world population and consumption
patterns continue to rise at unprecedented rates.
Sherri Goodman
Deputy Undersecretary for Defense for Environmental Security
Department of Defense
We at the Department of Defense have a long history of meeting our Nation's military
challenges and our people, technological and scientific expertise, and industrial base are National
assets. We are fully committed to meeting this nation's environmental challenges and have
requested that Congress authorize approximately $4.7 billion for environmental programs. Within
this request, we plan to invest over $179 million in environmental technologies with over $54
million implemented in full partnership with DOE and EPA.
We believe that environmental technologies can help us accomplish four goals: achieve
greater operational savings and mitigate future liabilities; improve performance and enhance
warfighting capability; meet environmental obligations in a cost-effective manner; and ensure
access to air, water, and land so that we can conduct training. DoD will play an important role
in the implementation of the National Environmental Technology Strategy and our federal
facilities working together, and in partnership, with the States and industry can be a great catalyst
to technological advancement.
-------
Ralph Peterson
President & CEO
CH2M Hill Companies, Ltd.
U.S environmental policy is at a critical cross-roads and receiving scrutiny from all sides
including Congress, government officials, regulators, industry, and environmental groups. There
is a surprisingly high appetite for policy reform among a wide spectrum of stakholders yet
significant, and divisive, disagreements persist on exactly how to proceed. Maybe this is because
the framework of U.S. environmental policy is so deeply rooted in an adversarial process.
However, our economic and environmental future depends upon moving beyond the existing,
and often counterproductive, debates.
A durable path forward for U.S. environmental policy will require that a central mission
of that policy be the enhancement of technological change. We will not have solutions which
allow us to meet high environmental standards better, faster and cheaper, unless technological
innovation is stimulated, not stymied, by environmental policies.
The work undertaken to develop and implement the National Environmental Technology
Strategy provides us with the building blocks to develop a new consensus between government
and industry. This event provides us with a valuable forum and a great opportunity to build on
that foundation; to set a common direction for government and industry — working together ~
in which environmental stewardship is an integral part of our national and global economic
interests. :
Livio DeSimone
Chairman of the Board and CEO
3M Company
This event is important from several standpoints. First, it reflects increasing global
emphasis on sustainable development — on the convergence of ecological and economic interests.
Second, it acknowledges the role of emerging, environmentally compatible technologies in
achieving a more sustainable planet. And, third, it promotes the theme of A Common Direction
for Business and Government — emphasizing the key role of partnerships.
The idea of partnering toward a sustainable future is a global phenomena and is gaining
momentum. I am privileged to serve as chair of the World Business Council for Sustainable
Development, an organization of more than 120 companies worldwide. From the WBCSD
perspective, I see a growing acknowledgement in the business world that concurrent economic
and environmental progress is both possible...and necessary. With this shift in perspective
comes an increased focus on the role of technology and technological innovation in meeting the
challenges posed by sustainable development.
Addressing tne challenge of sustainable development requires us to accept change, face
complexity, embrace innovation, and essentially facilitate a paradigm shift. We have to unleash
the imagination and the power of individuals and develop new policies which not only remove
the obstacles to innovation, but encourage innovation itself.
-------
-------
The Roundtables
Regulatory Reinvention for Technology Innovation
Building and Improving R&D Partnerships
Building Federal Facility Partnerships
Financing Environmental Technologies
Developing International Markets:
From Capacity Building to Exports
The following section of this Conference Report contains summaries of the
Roundtables and the Recommendations that were presented at the end of the Conference.
It should be noted that any follow-up or action items listed in this section were suggestions
by the participants in the Rountables.
-------
-------
ROUNDTABLE: Regulatory Reinvention for Technology Innovation
Co-Chairs
Fred Hansen, Deputy Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
John W. Creighton, Jr., President & CEO, Weyerhaeuser Company
Purpose
The purpose of this Roundtable was to help advance one of the primary goals of the National
Environmental Technology Strategy (NETS): "Achieve continuous improvement of the
environmental performance of U.S. industries, using the most advanced technologies and
cost-effective means possible, by strengthening incentives for innovation within the regulatory
system."
Background
Through various meetings leading up to the creation of the NETS, stakeholders voiced a common
need - to provide incentives for innovative regulatory and non-regulatory environmental
management approaches and to reduce barriers to innovation in the regulatory structure. In
particular, the notions of performance, flexibility and accountability were commonly cited as the
fundamental elements of a more adaptive system where the rapid development and deployment
of new, innovative technology would be common practice. The Environmental Protection Agency
has responded to this need by creating and testing a series of flexible, performance-based
approaches to environmental protection, with requisite accountability. These approaches provide
strong incentives to create and use new technologies in the U.S. and abroad, facilitating improved
environmental performance and economic competitiveness.
i
Discussion Topics
The Roundtable began with a brief overview of EPA's performance-based "building blocks" for
a new system. The overview outlined the successes and the remaining challenges of those
approaches currently being tested (e.g., Project XL, emissions trading, etc.). The majority of the
Roundtable consisted of a dialogue with industry and other stakeholders that focused on several
cross-cutting issues associated with performance-based approaches. These issues included (but
were not limited to): (1) Defining and Measuring Performance: what analytical and technical
tools are needed to help define and measure performance? (2) Engendering Trust and
Commitment: what actions can be taken to build trust among the regulated and non-regulated
communities that will instill their commitment to a new performance-based system? (3) Providing
Additional Incentives: what are other actions that can be taken to improve environmental
performance and economic competitiveness?
Expected Outcomes
Roundtable participants prioritized cross-cutting issues, and proposed public/private efforts to
address these issues. Discussion results were reported at the Plenary Roundtable.
-------
ROUNDTABLE: Regulatory Reinvention for Technology Innovation
SUMMARY of RECOMMENDATIONS
EPA is currently testing a number of performance-based approaches that are designed to achieve
superior environmental performance by allowing greater regulatory flexibility. These include:
Environmental Leadership Program; ETI Flexible CAA Title V Permitting; Design for Environment
Program; and Project XL. Stakeholder participation and support are vital to the acceptance and
broader application of these approaches. Additional emphasis should be placed on public outreach
to^ensure there is trust and widespread understanding that these new approaches will result in
superior performance rather than degradation in environmental quality.
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RECOMMENDED
Defining and Measuring Performance
General consensus: To move to a system aimed at achieving continuous improvement in
environmental performance, we need to go beyond discharge monitoring to look more holistically
at effects on public health and the environment (e.g., ambient monitoring, biomarkers). Also, third-
party certification of performance, as a substitute for government auditing, should be fully explored.
Action item: EPA will convene federal agencies, industry, environmental organizations, and others,
to establish strategic directions and specific next steps for RD&D and application of advanced
monitoring technologies to performance-based programs.
Engendering Trust and Commitment
General consensus: Information that is verifiable and transparent is the foundation for acceptance
of performance-based approaches. Increasing trust depends upon continued attention to good
science and mutual respect for environmental and economic goals.
Action item: In consultation with all stakeholders, EPA will evaluate early results from the new
performance-based programs, and identify refinements necessary to achieve continuous
environmental improvement through regulatory flexibility.
Providing Additional Incentives
General consensus: There are existing incentives for improving environmental performance which
need to be refined and publicized. However, there continue to be disincentives to innovation within
the regulatory framework.
Action item: EPA, through Project XL, will solicit proposals for testing innovative technologies
as a way to achieve additional environmental benefits. Also, in consultation with stakeholders, EPA
will expand its efforts to eliminate disincentives to new technologies.
-------
ROUNDTABLE: Building and Improving R&D Partnerships
Co-chairs
Charles Curtis, Deputy Secretary, US Department of Energy
Dr. William E. Coyne, Senior Vice President, R&D, 3M Co.
Purpose
This breakout session brought together outstanding leaders from industry and government to discuss
ways to build and improve R&D partnerships. Such partnerships are critical for providing
cost-effective solutions to existing environmental problems and for developing the next generation
of environmentally-sound products, processes, and practices.
Background
The US currently enjoys a lead in key environmental technologies, but our competitors are increasing
public and private investments in this crucial sector at a time when US investments have been stagnant
for 5 years. We are not only failing to keep pace with our competitors' investments. Increasingly,
industry is focusing on near-term objectives and the legitimacy of government investment and
government-industry partnerships is being questioned. Our challenge then, is to design ways that help
us retain our lead in the environmental technologies of the future; that help us meet and better our
international competition; that assure that we have the technological tools needed to build a safer,
more prosperous, and sustainable world.
Discussion Topics
R&D - The Context: Administration initiatives and budgets — what we are doing, why it adds value;
Congressional proposals; long term trends. What is working? What needs improvement? What are
competitor countries doing?
Defining roles; How can we establish appropriate roles for both the public and private sectors which
build on our respective strengths and responsibilities?
Establishing partnerships that work; Based on discussion of several models, effective mechanisms
were defined, and a blueprint for more effective partnerships was developed. Areas for new potential
partnerships to develop environmentally-critical technologies were explored.
Expected Outcomes
The group developed recommendations for the Plenary Roundtable designed to assure that public and
private sector R&D investments for environmental technologies are leveraged; that government
resources are directed appropriately, and that they are administratively easy to access and functionally
easy to use.
-------
ROUNDTABLE: Building and Improving R&D Partnerships
SUMMARY of RECOMMENDATIONS
By and large, it was viewed that government actions over the last few years to work more closely
with and as a partner to the private sector were a step in the right direction. However, more can and
should be done. Specific examples mentioned by the group of some successful programs include XL,
Industries of the Future, and the Remediation Technology Development Forum.
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RECOMMENDED
Improve Access to, and Performance of, Federal Resources
• Use and Cost of National Laboratories:
— We should continue to reduce Administrative complexity and the time it takes to
work with the Labs;
~ Where appropriate and feasible, overhead allocations should be re-examined to
ensure that they are fair and reasonable to all parties;
~ Enhance and encourage interagency laboratory efforts; streamline access for other
agencies, where possible.
• Continue to streamline the CRADA process, but expand use of alternative agreements.
Cooperative mechanisms should safeguard intellectual property rights, and assign them
clearly.
• Use Government as a customer and procurer to stimulate R&D; to verify and demonstrate
performance of innovative technologies:
—One possible idea — dedicated fund for purchasing innovative environmental
technologies.
• Keep universities as an integral and strong part of the national research infrastructure.
-------
ROUNDTABLE: Building and Improving R&D Partnerships
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RECOMMENDED
Make Regulations Innovation-Friendly and Make EPA a More Productive Partner
• Better align EPA mid-level and field policies with EPA directions.
• Improve incentives and resources for EPA field staff who must bear the risks of applying
innovative technologies; one idea - an "innovation ombudsperson" in each region.
• Indemnification is still a significant issue impeding new technologies; no incentives exist if
bringing new technologies to solve environmental problems creates new exposures to liability.
• Regulatory Reinvention needs technological tools such as new ways of producing goods, new
ways of monitoring (facility-based and fenceline monitoring). Also, government follow-
through on setting goals and subsequent enforcement is important. R&D policy needs to be
integrated and an industry/government study panel should take this further.
• Regulators are customers too ~ they should be involved in efforts early and often.
Experiment with New Ways of Partnering
• Pilot and reward innovation and success, especially through XL.
• Build on and expand successful models, such as:
—Industries of the Future - industry driven, sector-wide strategic agendas which provide
technology roadmaps and allow public investment where necessary, appropriate, and cost-
effective. (Agenda 20/20 etc.)
—Remediation Technology Development Forum - extensive stakeholder involvement that
allowed innovative cleanup approaches endorsed by state and federal agencies, NGOs,
adjacent communities, and contractors.
-------
-------
ROUNDTABLE: Building Federal Facilities Partnerships
Co-Chairs
Sherri Goodman, Deputy Under Secy of Defense (Environmental Security), DOD
Thomas P. Grumbly, Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management, DOE
James Edwards, Chief-Executive-Officer, ICF Kaiser International, Incorporated
Purpose
The purpose of this session was to examine new approaches for the use of economic incentives to
advance two of the primary goals from the National Environmental Technology Strategy (NETS):
"Ensure that the federal government becomes a more accessible partner with the private sector in
advancing the development of environmental technologies", and "Accelerate and facilitate the
demonstration of promising technologies -while reducing the costs".
Background
In the past year, Federal agencies have developed programs to include incentives for action in
procurement policies, contract reform, innovative public and private partnerships. All of these
programs seek to encourage investment for environmental improvement and technology
advancement. Continued progress in these areas requires a common plan for Federal agencies to make
environmental technology demonstration and advancement more accessible across agencies, states,
and facilities. An important goal is to speed up the process of developing and implementing programs
on a wide scale to move past the pilot phase and into the demonstration phase, and ultimately, into
the marketplace.
Discussion Topics
The Roundtable provided a brief overview and examples where progress has been made and the
challenges that remain. Opportunities to enhance existing partnerships between federal, state, and
local agencies and the private sector were identified. The discussion allowed participants to exchange
ideas, that would encourage government/ industry partnerships and identified an action plan to
accelerate environmental technology implementation as well as to promote a proactive public policy.
Areas for discussion included: (1) Acquisition policies to enhance pollution prevention; (2)
Regulatory reinvention; (3) Technology demonstration, use and acceptance; and (4) Contract
reform—incentives for actions and innovation.
Expected Outcomes
Roundtable participants proposed incentives: (1) to foster reciprocity processes for technology
demonstration, validation and certification; (2) for performance-based regulatory requirements and
technology verification procedures; and (3) to promote the use qf Federal facilities as test beds for
technology demonstration.
-------
ROUNDTABLE: Building Federal Facilities Partnerships
SUMMARY of RECOMMENDATIONS
The Roundtable recommends that a process be developed that expedites reciprocity for
environmental technology demonstration use and permitting across states and federal facilities.
This process would apply across agencies and across states.
The Roundtable encourages Federal agencies to use their facilities as test beds for technology
demonstration and use, for both government and industry application.
The Roundtable recognizes that regulatory reinvention depends on moving as rapidly as possible
to performance-based standards that focus on outcomes, determined by return on investment.
We should make sure that the contractor and government workforce is properly trained to apply
performance-based standards in contracting, technology and regulation. For example, the
National Performance Review should recognize that acquisition reform has produced significant
environmental benefits by enabling the Federal government and industry to adopt commercial
performance-based standards.
The Roundtable recommends that the Federal Government place a top priority on programs and
actions that focus on Stakeholder/decisionmaker partnerships for the purpose of joint problem
solving for environmental improvement. These would include: Government/industry; Labor/
management; Government with stakeholders; and Government/industry collaboration with non-
U.S. entities.
The Roundtable recommends that government should continue its push to incentivize
innovation for environmental programs for both contractors and government personnel at Federal
Facilities. Government should be encouraged to take advantage of privatization
activities/opportunities in a fashion that includes organized labor, as appropriate.
The Roundtable recommends that early on in the R&D process, that technology developers are
able to obtain the rights to a technology in order to facilitate financing, commercialization, etc.
Special emphasis should be placed on small businesses, and the use of Federal facilities for
demonstration and validation.
-------
ROUNDTABLE: Financing Environmental Technologies
Co-Chairs
John P. DeVillars, Regional Administrator, USEPA, Region One
Maurice Strong, Chairman, Technology Development Incorporated
(Senior Advisor to the President of the World Bank)
Purpose
The purpose of this Roundtable was to help advance one of the primary goals of the National
Enviromental Technology Strategy (NETS): "Ensure that adequate investment capital is available
for the development, commercialization, and use of environmental technologies." Discussions
focused on the issues of financing environmental technologies, products, and practices from both the
demand and the supply sides of the marketplace.
Background
In order to focus principally on those issues most relevant to finance, discussions at this rouridtable
began by assuming that participants in the other four roundtables (R&D, Federal Facilities,
International/Exports, and Regulatory Reinvention) would all be successful in achieving significant
progress towards their stated objectives. That is, they would be able to develop incentives for
innovative regulatory and non-regulatory environmental management approaches, reduce barriers to
innovation, speed up the commercialization process, facilitate the aggregation of markets, and,
generally, improve the climate for both short and long-term investment in environmental solutions.
Discussion then move on to determine: What else is necessary, if anything, to increase capital
availability for environmental technologies? Also considered was the question: What changes in
other areas are most crucial to increase capital supply and market demand?
Discussion Topics
The following topics were addressed: (1) Relationship between "market dynamics" and "finance", i.e.,
What are the linkages, barriers and incentives? (2) Types of capital and issues unique to each: Venture
Capital, Growth Capital (Debt and Equity), Funds (Pension, Sector-specific), Insurance, Public
Sector; (3) What are the roles, impacts and perspectives of credit rating agencies, SEC, ISO, etc. (4)
What 'are the "tools" available to effect the problem: Tax, fiscal, accounting, market-based
instruments, credit trading programs, risk reduction programs, public sector purchasing decisions, etc.
Expected Outcomes
Roundtable participants developed a prioritized list of (1) issues and recommendations specific to
finance, and (2) issues and recommendations which were cross-cutting and relevant to other
roundtable discussions. The results and conclusions were then reported to the Vice-President in the
Plenary Roundtable session.
-------
ROUNDTABLE: Financing Environmental Technologies
SUMMARY of RECOMMENDATIONS
There is abundant capital in both the US and International financial markets. This capital
is flowing to areas of growth and opportunity, such as biotechnology and information systems.
The past year has brought broad awareness to the importance of implementing new policies
which shape and harnesses market forces towards eco-efficiency. Environmental technologies
and markets, as they exist currently, have too many moving variables - which substantially
increase the risks and lower the potential returns on investment capital relative to other industries.
At present there are few policies or programs in existence which address the issue of
private capital flows into environmental technologies and markets. Efforts at the EPA with
Project XL, the Verification Centers, the Center for Environmental Industry and Technology, etc
are examples of public sector facilitation which will be constructive if allowed to mature.
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RECOMMENDED
Performance-Based Approaches:
Action Item
To- re-cast regulations, contracting and purchasing to be more flexible,
performance and incentive oriented.
More setting standards and monitoring compliance, with less focus on
the methods used to meet or exceed standards.
Independent, 3d party auditing systems (similar to the Securities
Exchange Commission for financial markets supervision).
Responsibility Lead organizing responsibility, EPA in coordination with DOE, DOD,
DOC, GSA (e.g. the Regulatory Reinvention Roundtable with outreach).
Full cost accounting
Action Item A joint public/private initiative to focus on environmental cost accounting
issues. Outline what actions are necessary to assist organizations to further
develop and adopt accounting practices that link environmental costs with
the products, processes, and activities that generate them. The objective
is to better inform business decisions and help companies justify
environmentally-beneficial investments both internally and to external
financial institutions. Explore the possibility of working with a specific
industry to map its environmental activities and measure the associated
costs.
Responsibility Lead organizing responsibility, OSTP in coordination with PCSD.
-------
ROUNDTABLE: Financing Environmental Technologies
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RECOMMENDED
Government as buyer and risk mitigator
Action Item Government must "behave" better as a buyer and contractor. Must match
contracting terms to length of the sectors needs. Can act as "insurer" for
certain pieces of the risk curve which are within the control of government.
Participation to include GSA, private sector capital providers and
potentially OMB, Treasury.
Responsibility Lead responsibility, OSTP in coordination with DOE, DOD and EPA
Bonus/Incentive for early adapters
Action Item Incentives to induce capital and management effort. Could be tax credits,
lending, preferred government buying, etc.
Responsibility Lead organizing responsibility, EPA with DOE.
Information
Action Item Omnibudsman and One-Stop-Shop Concept. Better systems for collecting
and utilizing information, including info on "markets" and spending like
the "PACE" series at DOC and the "Enviro Statistics Center" at EPA.
Responsibility Lead organizing responsibility, IETO.
Voluntary Approaches
Action Item Sullivan Standards, ISO 14000, etc
Responsibility Lead organizing responsibility, OSTP with PCSD.
Coordinating Functions
Action Item It is important to coordinate finance recommendations with all four other
RT's, but in particular with Regulatory Reinvention. Recommend the
creation of a "Financial Coordinating Council" to act as a cross-walk and
/s common ground for the purpose of maximizing the increased flow of
private capital. To include DOE, DOD, DOC.
Responsibility Lead organizing responsibility, EPA.
-------
ROUNDTABLE: Financing Environmental Technologies
Observations on capital availability at points on the Technolgy Development curve:
R&D
Demo
Development
Commercialization
Growth
Export
Start-up Companies
Small Companies
Large Companies
Not addressed in this Roundtable
Verification programs will help reduce risk
Gov't can help by "purchasing technology"
Gov't as "insurer" plus risk mitigation programs
Liquidity facilitating programs (e.g., Fannie Mae)
Not addressed in this Roundtable
Private action if Gov't moves to "performance-based regs"
SBA should consider a more focused program here
Can improve with better contracting by Public Sector
-------
ROUNDTABLE: Developing International Markets:
From Capacity Building to Exports
Co-Chairs
Stuart Eizenstat, Under Secy for International Trade, DOC
Don Deieso, CEO and President, Metcalf & Eddy Company
Purpose
This Rountable sought to advance the complementary objectives of the Environmental
Technologies Export Initiative, which aims to support global sustainable development while
enhancing the international competitiveness of the U.S. environmental technologies.
Background
Development of international environmental markets is critical to achieving global sustainable
development, and to supporting greater U.S. economic growth, jobs, and exports. The
environmental technologies sector is one of the fastest growing industry sectors worldwide. The
current global market for envirotech is estimated at about $400 billion and is projected to reach
$600 billion by the year 2010. Competition for this burgeoning market is fierce; and despite the
U.S. industry's vast experience and technological leadership in this sector, it is not realizing its
full commercial potential in the international marketplace.
Discussion Topics
The two key sections of the Roundtable provided a brief overview of the Administration's
comprehensive strategy under the Initiative. One section discussed programs aimed at "building"
environmental markets, particularly those programs focused on human and institutional capacity
building via technical assistance and training. The other key section focused on programs which
more directly assist and facilitate U.S. exports of envirotech -business counseling and outreach,
export promotion, financing, advocacy. Dialogue at the Roundtable drew on the private sector
participants' experiences, with these programs and in the international marketplace, to illustrate
what works and what does not work. Further discussions considered the special needs of
different types of companies or in specific envirotech sectors, how the competition is addressing
the same issues and how U.S. public-private efforts can address these challenges.
Expected Outcomes
Roundtable participants prioritized the key issues and recommended specific public-private
efforts, in the short-to-medium term, to address those issues.
-------
ROUNDTABLE: Developing International Markets:
From Capacity Building to Exports
SUMMARY of RECOMMENDATIONS
The Clinton Administration's Environmental Technologies Export Initiative is providing a
comprehensive and targeted strategy to support global sustainable development while enhancing the
international competitiveness of the U.S. environmental technologies industry and its exports of
goods and services. A close public-private partnership throughout the Initiative is resulting in a more
successful and efficient delivery of assistance to the U.S. envirotech industry.
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RECOMMENDED
Public-Private Partnerships New, strategic public-private partnerships that respond to industry
needs and input are essential to increasing U.S. market share in the rapidly growing world market for
environmental technologies. Our competitors have long used this approach to achieve success in
international markets and U.S. firms now operate at a relative competitive disadvantage.
Recommendation(s): (a) Provide a high-level USG platform for the release of the Environmental
Technology Trade Advisory Committee's (ETTAC) recommendations to the interagency Trade
Promotion Coordinating Committee (TPCC). (b) Work with the private sector to implement key
ETTAC recommendations, such as the development of industry consortia that enhance the trade
competitiveness of U.S. environmental companies, with a special emphasis on SMEs, which account
for a large proportion of the sector.
Action Item(s): (a) In September '96, the ETTAC will present a report and specific
recommendations to the Secretary of Commerce and the TPCC agencies. These recommendations
from the 35-member ETTAC will address numerous issues related to envirotech exports, including:
financing, budget and resource allocation, advocacy, interagency coordination, and disincentives to
trade, (b) In June 1996, the Department of Commerce and the Department of Justice granted an
Export Trading Company Certificate to the Water and Waste Water Equipment Manufacturers
Association (WWEMA). This first-ever certificate to the envirotech industry, issued under the 1982
Export Trading Act, protects 25 WWEMA member companies from state and federal government
antitrust actions, thus facilitating actions that will enhance their trade competitiveness (e.g., the
establishment of consortia, sharing of cost/price information, etc).
-------
ROUNDTABLE: Developing International Markets:
From Capacity Building to Exports
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RECOMMENDED
Environmental Industry Classification System. There is insufficient and inconsistent definition
and data on the envirotech industry. A specific and complete industry classification system is
needed to clearly understand the composition of the envirotech industry, its contributions to the
economy and trade, and its international competitiveness.
Recommendation: Launch a comprehensive review and survey of the envirotech industry in order
to develop a more useful and accurate industry classification system and data.
Action Item: By end of summer 1996, the Department of Commerce and EPA will conduct the first-
ever comprehensive survey of the envirotech industry through a sample of approximately 7-10,000
U.S. companies. This information will help develop a classification system and instruments needed
for periodic benchmarking of the industry (e.g., quinquennial censuses).
States Envirotech Initiative. Fostering greater envirotech exports development programs at the
state and local level is essential to: 1) counteract decreasing federal budgets and programs; 2) focus
greater delivery of assistance to SMEs that dominate this sector; and 3) advance the Administration's
efforts to empower states and support their programs.
Recommendation: Develop a "States Envirotech Exports Initiative" focused on expanding and
strengthening cooperation among state and local economic development agencies and trade
associations to increase envirotech exports.
Action Item(s): (a) Follow up to the States Environmental Exports Forum, held during Earth Week
1996, which successfully brought together representatives from more than 20 states and unveiled
state trade data demonstrating the contribution of the sector to each state's economy; (b) In
coordination with key state representatives, develop an action plan and organizational structure to
carry out the initiative (e.g., a states-industry led secretariat), (c) Develop a pilot demonstration
project focused on the state of California which has the largest envirotech industry in the U.S., and
is very active in the development of envirotech markets and exports.
-------
ROUNDTABLE: Developing International Markets:
From Capacity Building to Exports
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RECOMMENDED
Financing Exports/Use of Tied Aid. Adequate financing is key to the goal of increasing U.S.
envirotech exports. The USG must offer competitive financing terms to enhance U.S. industry's
ability to compete in the international envirotech market, particularly in the fast growing emerging
markets.
Recommendation:
envirotech sector.
Counter our competitors' use of preferential financing and tied aid in the
Action Item(s): Provide a priority focus to environment-related exports in the programs of the United
States Export-Import Bank. Currently, the Ex-Im Bank aggressively supports U.S. envirotech
exports through its Environmental Business Development Program, which offers environmental
companies special terms and conditions not available to the exports of other sectors; and through the
use of its Tied Aid Capital Projects Fund, which is aimed at countering the trade-distorting tied aid
and concessionary financing which often faces U.S. companies in foreign markets.
-------
The Participants
-------
-------
Lilia Abron
President
PEER Consultants, PC
12300 Twinbrook Parkway Suite 410
Rockville MD 20852
Joe Newton Austin, Jr.
Consultant
ICI Americas
8403 Arlington Blvd., Suite 100
Fairfax VA 22031
. Edward Aghjayan
General Manager, Public Utilities Department
City of Anaheim, Anaheim Public Utilities
201 South Anaheim Blvd. #1101
Anaheim CA 92805
Robert Darryl Banks
Director, Program in Technology and the Environment
World Resources Institute
1709 New York Avenue, NW
Washington DC 20006
Vincent Albanese
Vice President, U.S. Marketing and Sales
Nalco Fuel Tech
P.O. Box 3031
Naperville IL
Suzanne Bass
State - Federal Liason
Texas Natrual Resource Conservation Commission
122 C Street, NW Suite 122
Washington DC 20001
Ronald Allen
President
Alenco International, Inc.
735 Commerce Circle
Longwood FL 32750
Robert Bauer
Director, Strategic Competency Development
Xerox PARC
3333 Coyote Hill Road
Palo Alto CA 94304
Alvin Aim
Director and Sector Vice President
Science Applications International Corporation
1710 Goodrich Drive
McLean VA 22102
Dennis E. Beach
Vice-President - Administration
Chaparral Steel
300 Ward Rd
Midlothian TX 76065-9651
Anne Alonzo
Deputy Assistant Secretary
U.S. Department of Commerce
14th & Pennsylvania Ave., NW Room 4324
Washington DC 20230
David J. Beightol
Manager, Government Affairs
Johnson Controls, Inc.
400 N. Capitol St., NW Suite 585
Washington DC 20001
William Amt
CEO
Octagon, Inc.
317 S. North Lake Blvd.
Altamonte Springs FL
Suite 1024
32701
Julie Belaga
Director '
Export-Import Bank of the United States
811 Vermont Avenue, NW
Washington DC 20571
-------
Joan Berkowitz
Managing Director
Farkas Berkowitz & Company
1220 19th Street, NW
Washington DC 20036
Charles Botwick
Principal
Botwick & Associates
Box 1710
Middleburg VA 22117
Peter Bibko
Manager, Environmental and Government Affairs
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
PO Box 3370
Gramercy LA 70052
Peter Bowe
President
Ellicot Machine Corporation, International
1611 Bush Street
Baltimore MD 21230
Anthony Biddle
Vice President of Global Environmental Strategy
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
One Chase Manhattan Bank, Third Floor
New York NY 10081
Celeste Boykin
Manager, Federal Affairs
DuPont
1701 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Suite 900
Washington DC 20006
Kevin Billings
Director and General Manager GESCO
Westinghouse Electric Corporation
600 New Hampshire Ave., NW
Washington DC 20037
William Brennan
President
Griffin Capital Corporation
27 Longwood Drive
Wayne PA 19087
Robert Blackwell
Senior Vice President
OHM Corp.
816 Connecticut Ave., NW Suite 900
Washington DC 20006
Maj. Gen. Roy Bridges
Director, Joint Group on Aquisition Pollution Prevention
United States Air Force
4375 Chidlaw Road, Suite 6
Wright-Patterson AFB OH 45433-5006
Col. Franklin Blaisdell
Commander, 30th Space Wing
United States Air Force
747 Nebraska Ave., Ste A200-1
Vandenberg AFB CA 93437-6261
Dr. Wallace P. Brithinee
President
Brithinee Electric
620 S. Rancho Avenue
Colton CA 92324
Thomas Bonnett
Director, Economic Development & Environment
Council of Governors Policy Advisors
400 N. Capitol Streetm NW Suite 390
Washington DC 20001
Mary (Meg) Brown
Associate Director
Georgia Env. Technolgy Consortium
University of Georgia, 101 Driftmier Engineering Center
Athens GA 30602
-------
Trudy Bryan
Senior Mananger of Federal Affairs
DuPont
1701 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Suite 900
Washington DC 20006
Dennis Caputo
Vice President, Environmental Safety & Compliance
Proler International Corporation
4265 San Felipe Suite 900
Houston TX 77027
Hon. Carolyn Buchholz
Mayor
City of Lafayette
1660 Lincoln Street #1975
Denver CO 80264
Eugene (Roy) Carawan
President and CEO
INFOOD Ltd.
5511 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh NC 27606
Paul Bulson
Director of Asia Operations
Ecology and Environment, Inc.
999 Third Avenue Suite 1500
Seattle WA 98104
John Carberry
Director, Environmental Technology
DuPont
Experimental Station, Bldg 249-119
Wilmington DE 19880-0249
Dale Byars
Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc.
1161 Corporate Drive West, Suite 140
Arlington TX 76006
Walter Carey
Director, Env. Operations & Regulatory Policy
Nestle USA, Inc.
60 Boardman Road
NewMilford CT 06776
William Byers
Director of Environmental Technology
CH2M HILL Federal Group, Inc.
2300 NW Walnut Blvd.
Corvallis OR 97330
Peter Carroll
Vice President, Government Affairs
Solar Turbines, Inc.
818 Connecticut Ave., NW Suite 600
Washington DC 20006-2702
James (Jim) Cabot
Director-CEIT
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
JFK Federal Building (RAA)
Boston MA 02203
Edith Cecil
Executive Director
U.S. Environmental Training Institute
1000 Thomas Jefferson St., NW
Washington DC 20007
Connie Callan
Director, National Environmental Technology Network
University of New Mexico
2201 Buena Vista, S.E. Suite 204
Albuquerque NM 87106
Robert Cochran
Sr VP - Corp. & Business Development of Fed Programs
ICF Kaiser
9300 Lee Highway
Fairfax VA 20031
-------
Robert Colangelo
President
Environmental Planning Group, Inc.
3105-D North Wilke Road
Arlington Heights IL 60004
David Crikelair
Vice President, Alternate Energy
Texaco, Inc.
2000 Westchester Ave.
White Plains NY 10650
Megan Contee
Senior Program Manager for Env. Programs
National Association of State Development Agencies
750 First Street, NE Suite 710
Washington DC 20002
Charles Curtis
Deputy Secretary
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue SW
Washington DC 20585
David James Cooper
Consultant
American Forest & Paper Association
1111 19th Street
Washington DC 20005
Daniel D'Aniello
Managing Director
The Carlyle Group
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue Suite 220 South
Washington DC 20004
John K. Coors
President
Golden Photon, Inc.
4545 Mclntyre Street
Golden CO 80403
Katherine Dantz
Market Specialist - Energy & Environmental Markets
Honeywell, Inc.
1100 Connecticut Ave., NW Suite 710
Washington DC 20036
William Coyne
Senior Vice President for Research and Development
3M Company
Les Darling
Director, Environmental Affairs
Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
9100E. Mineral Circle
Englewood CO 80155
John Creighton
President and CEO
Weyerhauser
MS CHSH
Tacoma WA 98477
Drew S. Debrey
President
Quad City Die Casting Company
3800 River Drive
Moline IL 61265
Jacqueline Crenca
Vice President, Defense Programs
CH2M HILL Federal Group, Inc.
6060 South Willow Drive
Greenwood Village CO 80111
Donald Deieso
President and CEO
Metcalf and Eddy, Inc.
P.O. Box 1500
Somerville NJ 08876
-------
Michael Scott Delello
Director Washington Relations
Electric Power Research Institute
2000 L Street, NW Suite 805
Washington DC 20036
Samuel Doctors
Executive Director
Environmental Finance Center Region 9
25800 Carlos Bee Blvd. SBE RO109
Hayward CA 94542-3069
James Herbert Dempsey
Director, Technology Development
Acurex Environmental Corporation
POBox 13109
Research Triangle Park NC 27709
Anthony Dolcimascolo
CFO
TAMS Consultants, Inc.
655 Third Avenue
New York NY 10017
Livio DeSimone
Chairman of the Board & CEO
3M Company
3M Center, Bldg 220-14W-05
St. Paul MN 55144-1000
Sandra Doliner
Chief Financial Officer
Environmental Enterprises Assistance Fund
1901 N. Moore Street, Suite 1004
Arlington VA 22209
John DeVillars
Regional Administrator
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
JFK Federal Building
Boston MA 02203
A.J. Donelson
Manager Federal Government Affairs
3M Company
1101 15th Street NW Suite 1100
Washington DC 20005
Betty J. Diener
President
Enviromental Business Council of New England
500 Victory Rd., Marina Bay
North Quincy MA 02171
Cyril William Draffin, Jr.
Vice President, Strategic Planning
BDM International, Inc.
1501 BDM Way
McLean VA 22102
Wayne Diesel
President and CEO
Mechanical Technology, Inc.
968 Albany-Shaker Road
Latham NY 12110
Michael Driver
Partner
Patton Boggs, L.L.P.
1660 Lincoln Street, Suite 1975
Denver CO 80264
Patricia DiRuggiero
Associate General Counsel
M4 Environmental Management
1615 L Street, NW Suite 540
Washington DC 20015
Michael Duff
Executive Director
The Analytical Instrument Association
225 Reinekers Lane Suite 625
Alexandria VA 22314-2875
-------
Mark DuVal
ST. Counsel
3M Company
Bldg. 220-1 IE-OS, 3M Center
St. Paul MN 5146-1000
Dennis Ferrigno
President and CEO
Bateman Engineering, Inc.
3900 SS. Wadsworth Blvd. Suite 200
Denver CO 80235-2205
Anthony Earley, Jr.
President and COO
Detroit Edison
2000 Second Avenue
Detroit Ml 48226
James Ferris
President
CH2M HILL Federal Group, Inc.
6060 Willow Drive
Greenwood Village CO 80111
James Edwards
Chairman & CEO
ICF Kaiser International, Inc.
9300 Lee Highway
Fairfax VA 22031-1207
Donna Fitzpatrick
President and CEO
Radiance Services Company
4405 East-West Highway Suite 512
Bethesda MD 20814
Stuart Eizenstadt
Under Secretary for InternationalTrade
U.S. Department of Commerce
14th & Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington DC 20230
Timothy Flaherty
Director
Keystone Energy Program
1001 G Street, NW, Suite 430 West
Washington DC 20001
Greg Evans
VP - Environmental Services & Technology Division
Coleman Research Corportation
950 L'Enfant Plaza
Washington DC 20024
James Florio
Partner
Florio & Perrucci, P.C.
371 Hoes Lane
Piscataway NJ 08854
Marc Falkin
International Sales Director
Taylor Environmental International
1457 Route 22 East
Annandale NJ 08801
Harvey Forest
President and CEO
Solarex Corp.
630 Solarex Court
Frederick MD 21701
Robert L. Ferguson
Chairman
Technical Resources International, Inc.
723 The Parkway
Richland WA 99352
Charles L. Fox
Director Legislative Liason
Raytheon
1215 Jefferson Davis Highway
Arlington VA 22202
-------
Linda Greer
Senior Scientist
Natural Resources Defense Council
1350 New York Ave., NW
Washington DC
Don Hartsell
President
Solex Environmental Systems, Inc.
1003 Wirt Road Suite 107
Houston TX 77055
Thomas Crumbly
Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management
U. S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave, SW
Washington DC 20585
Thomas Harvey
Chairman and CEO
Global Environment & Technology Foundation
7010 Little River Suite 300
Annandale VA 22003
William Haney
President and CEO
Molten Metal Technology Inc.
51 Sawyer Road, Fifth Floor
Waltham MA 02154
Karl Hausker
Director, Enterprise for the Environment
Center for Strategic and International Studies
1800 K Street, Nw
Washington DC 20006
Robert Hanfling
Senior Advisor
Patton Boggs, LLP
1776 I Street, NW Suite 600
Washington DC 20006
Andrew W. Hayes
Vice President, Corporate Product Integrity
The Gillette Company
Prudential Tower Building
Boston MA 02199
Paul Hannesson
President and CEO
Commodore Environmental Services, Inc.
Alan Hecht
Office of International Activities
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street SW
Washington DC 20460
Frederic Hansen
Deputy Administrator
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW
Washington DC 20460
Ben Henneke, Jr.
President and CEO
Clean Air Action Corporation
36 South Charles Street Suite 1910
Baltimore MD 21201
Peter Harrod
Executive Vice President & COO
Advance Sciences, Inc.
6739 Academy Road, NE
Albuquerque NM 87109
Judson (Jud) Hill
Executive Vice President
Thermatrix, Inc.
1 Church St. Suite 700
Rockville MD 20850
-------
Paul Frey
Senior Vice President
Bank of America Illinois
231 S. LaSalle Street Suite 638
Chicago IL 60697
Bradford Gentry
Senior Research Scholar
Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy
205 Prospect Street, "Sage Hall
New Haven CT 06511
Paul Friday
Principal Technical Manager
Concurrent Technologies Corp.
1450 Scaid Avenue
Johnstown PA 15904
Maurizio Giabbai, Phd.
President
Strategic Technologies & Resources, Ltd.
2211 New Market Pkwy, Suite 154
Marietta GA 30067
Johan Friedericy
Director, Research & Technology
Allied Signal Aerospace
1001 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Suite 700 South
Washington DC 20004
John H. (Jack) Gibbons
Assistant to the President for Science and Technology
The White House
Old Executive Office Building
Washington DC 20502
Allen Frischkorn
President and CEO
Environmental Industry Association
4301 Connecticut Ave, NW Suite 300
Washington DC 20008
Mary Lowe Good
Under Secretary for Technology
U.S. Department of Commerce
14th and Constitution, N.W. Room 4824
Washington DC 20230
Darryl Fry
Chairman of the Board, President and CEO
Cytec Industries, Inc.
5 Garret Mountain Plaza
West Patterson NJ 07424
Samuel Goodhope
Special Counsel for Environment and Transportation
Office of the Attorney General State of Texas
P.O. Box 12548 Capitol Station
Austin TX 78711
Jaques Gansler
Executive Vice President
TASC, Inc.
1101 Wilson Blvd. Suite 1500
Arlington VA 22209
Albert Gray
Deputy Executive Director
Water Environmental Federation
601 Wythe Street
Alexandria VA 22314
David Gardiner
Ass't. Administrator for Policy, Planning and Evaluation
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW
Washington DC 20460
David Mitchell Gray
Managing Director
Alex Brown & Sons, Inc.
135 E. Baltimore Street
Baltimore MD 21202
-------
John Kolojeski
Executive Vice President
Octagon, Inc.
39955 Oatlands Mill Road
Leesburg VA 22075
Robert Laudise
Adjunct Chemical Director
Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies
600 Mountain Avenue, Room 1A-264
Murray Hill NJ 07974-0636
Martha Krebs
Director, Office of Energy Research
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave., SW
Washington DC 20585-0118
Hon. Jan Laverty -Jones
Mayor
City of Las Vegas
400 East Stewart Avenue
Las Vegas NV 89101
Kalliana Krishnan
President/CEO
Kal Krishnan Consulting Services, Inc.
334 19th Street
Oakland CA 94612
Michael Leake
Director, Environmental, Safety and Health
Texas Instrument Comm. and Defense Systems Group
P.O. Box 655303 M/S 8365
Dallas TX 75265
Dawn Kristof
President
Water & Wastewater Equipment Manufacturing Association
P.O. Box17402
Washington DC 20041
Robert Levy
Vice President, Government and Regulatory Affairs
Energy BioSystems Corporation
4200 Research Forest Drive
The Woodlands TX 77381
Chuck Lacy
General Manager
Living Technologies, Inc.
431 Pine Street
Burlington VT 05465
Andrew Lietz
President and CEO
Hadco Corporation
12A Manor Parkway
Salem NH 03079
Paul Lambert
Vice-President, Coating Operations
Polaroid Corp.
1265 Main Street, Bldg. W4-2W
Waltham MA 02154
Kathryn Lindquist
Vice President - Marketing
Taylor-DeJough Inc.
1350 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 915
Washington DC 20036
Jonathan Lash
President
World Resources Institute
1709 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington DC 20006
Diana MacArthur
CEO
Dynamac Corporation
2275 Research Blvd Suite 500
Rockville MD 20850
-------
Robert Hill
Chairman, Joint Pollution Prevention Advisory Board
HQ Air Force Materiel Command/ DRM
4375 Chidlaw Road, Suite 6
Wright-Patterson AFB OH 45433-5006
Kathryn Jackson
Senior Vice President, Resource Group
Tennessee Valley Authority
400 West Summit Hill Drive
Knoxville TN 37902
Thomas Houlihan
Senior Analyst
Institute of Regulatory Sciences
5457 Twin Knolls Road
Columbia MD 21045
Jim Janis
Executive Vice President
BNFL, Inc.
1776 I Street, NW Suite 750
Washington DC 20006-3700
Robert P. Howard
Corporate Director, Government Relations
Reynolds Metals Company
6603 W. Broad Street
Richmond VA 23230
Dawn Kaback
Executive Director
Colorado Center for Environmental Management
999 18th St., #2750
Denver CO 80202
Walter Howes
President
EBI Capital Group, LLP
1314Timberly Lane
McLean VA 22102
Dale Lee Keairns
Manager of Chemical & Environmental Operations
Westinghouse Science & Technology Center
1310 Beulah Road
Pittsburgh PA 15235
Jeffrey Hunker
Senior Advisor to the Secretary
U.S. Department of Commerce
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington DC 20230
James Kirk
Chairman, President & CEO
OHM Remediation Services Corporation
16406 U.S. Route 224 East
Findlay OH 45839-0551
Ronald Hunter
Vice President-Administrative Services
Fannie Mae
3900 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
Washington DC 20016
William Kirksey
Paul Inderbit^en
Chairman, President and CEO
American Re-Insurance Company
555 College Road East
Princeton NJ 08543
Allen Michael Koleff
VP - Environment, Energy and Process Technology
Stone Container Corporation
1979 Lakeside Parkway, Suite 300
Tucker GA 30084
-------
James Mahoney
Senior Vice President
International Technology Corporation
23456 Hawthorne Boulevard Suite 300
Torrance CA 90505
Thomas McNabb
President
Aquatics Unlimited, Inc.
2150 Franklin Canyon Road
Martinez CA 94553
Dennis Mangino
President & CEO
NSF International
3475 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor Ml 48105
Martin Mearhoff
Manager, Environmental Services Division
American Electric Power
One Riverside Plaza
Columbus OH 43215
Vik Man!
Vice-President, Federal Group Services
CH2M HILL Federal Group, Inc.
6060 South Willow Drive
Greenwood Village CO 80111-5142
William Miller, 111
Manager Environmental Affairs
Saturn Corporation
100 Saturn Parkway PO Box 1500
Spring Hill TN 37174
David Marsh
Chairman
Marsh Plating Company
103 N. Grove Street
Ypsilanti Ml 48198
Kenneth Millian
Executive Director
Global Environmental Management Initiative
2000 L St., NW Suite 710
Washington DC 20005
Bret Maxwell
Managing Director
First Analysis Corporation
233 S. Wacker DriveSuite 9500
Chicago IL 60606
John Mizroch
Executive Director
U.S. Environmental Technology Export Council
1835 K Street, NW Suite 805
Washington DC 20006
R. Steven Maxwell
Managing Director
Techknowledgey Strategic Group
104 Pine Tree Lane
Boulder CO 80304
Andrew Murphy
Vice President
Acurex Environmental Corporation
P.O. Box 13109
Research Triangle Park NC 27709
Alan McKim
President and CEO
Clean Harbors Inc.
325 Wood Road
Braintree MA 02184
John iCharles Mycock
Executive Vice President
ETS lnternational,lnc.
1401 Municipal
Roanoke VA 24102
-------
Albert Narath
President, Energy and Environment Sector
Lockheed Martin Corporation
1155 University Blvd.
Albuquerque NM 87106-4320
Deana Perlmutter
Policy Analyst
Patton Boggs, L.L.P.
1660 Lincoln St. Suite 1975
Denver CO 80264
Tim Newell
Deputy Director for Policy
White House Office of Science and Technology Policy
Old Executive Office Building Room 428
Washington DC 20500
Ralph Peterson
Chief Executive Officer
CH2M HILL Companies, Ltd.
6060 S. Willow Drive P.O. Box 22508
Denver CO 80222
Frank Nutter
President
Reinsurance Association of America
1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 900
Washington DC 20004
Richard Pinckert
Director, Environmental Assurance Division
McDonnell Douglas Aerospace Corporation
P.O. Box 516
St. Louis MO 63166
John Oleson
Director, Manufacturing Technology
Dow Corning Corporation
P.O. Box 994
Midland Ml 48686-0994
Hon. Robert Pirie
Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Inst. and Env.)
United States Navy
1000 Navy Pentagon
Washington DC 20350-1000
E. Timothy Oppelt
Director, National Risk Management Research Laboratory
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
26 W. Martin Luther King Dr. (MS 235)
Cincinnati OH 45268
John Pirotte
President & CEO
Corpex Technologies, Inc.
P.O. Box 13486
Research Triangle Park NC
27709-3486
James Albert Palmer, Jr.
President, Newport News Nuclear
Newport News Shipbuilding
4101 Washington Ave.
Newport News VA 23607
Frank Pope
General Partner
Technology Funding, Inc.
2000 Alameda de las Pulgas
SanMateo CA 94403
Allen Paul
President
UNISPHERE Institute
1625 Massachusetts Ave., NW Suite 215
Washington DC 20036
Jan Power
President
Power Associates Group
305 Whispering Oaks Lane
Davidsonville MD 21035
-------
John Preston
President and CEO
Quantum Energy Technology
238 Main Street Suite 324
Cambridge MA 02142
Jim Ricci
President
Twin Rivers Technologies
780 Washington Street
Quincy MA 02169
Robert Prince
President & CEO
GTS-Duratech
8955 Guilford Road Suite 200
Columbia MD 21046
Vernon Rice
Associate General Counsel
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company
1007 Market Street, Legal, D-8042
Wilmington DE 19898
Fernando Quezada
Executive Director
Biotechnology Center of Excellence Corporation
Nine Park Street
Boston MA 02108-4807
James Richter
Vice President, Strategic Development
National Center for Manufacturing Sciences
3025 Boardwalk
Ann Arbor Ml 48108-3266
Bryan Redd
President
Global Technologies Connection, Ltd
12616 Amber Terrace
Richmond VA 23233
John Riggs
Director, Program on Energy and the Environment
Aspen Institute
1333 New Hampshire Ave., NW Suite 1070
Washington DC 20036
Thomas J. Redder
Region VIII Administrator of the SBA
SBA
721 19th Street, Suite 400
Denver CO 80202-2599
Robert E. Roberts
Executive Director
The Environmental Council of States
444 N. Capitol Street Suite 517
Washington DC 20001
David Rejeski
Senior Policy Analyst
White House Office of Science and Technology Policy
Old Executive Office Building, Room 443
Washington DC 20500
Robert (Gregg) Roberts
Senior VP & Director, Environmental Risk Services
AON Risk Services
510 Bering Drive Suite 500
Houston TX 77057
Susan Resetar
Analyst
RAND/CTI
2100 M Street, NW
Washington DC 20037
William J. Roberts
Legislative Director
Environmental Defense Fund
1875 Connecticut Ave.
Washington DC 20009
-------
Ira Rubenstein
Executive Director
Environmental Business Association of New York State
1223 Peoples Avenue
Troy NY 12180
Howard Schirmer
President
CH2M HILL International, Ltd.
6060 South Willow Drive
Greenwood Village CO 80222
Kenneth Rubin
President
Apogee International, Inc.
4350 East West Highway 6th Floor
Bethesda MD 20814
Brig. Gen. Sheehan
Deputy for Resource Management
United States Air Force
SAF/MI, 1660 Air Force Pentagon
Washington DC 20330-1660
Dean Rulis
President
Golden Technologies
4545 Mclntyre
Golden CO 80403
Robert Shinn
Commissioner
New Jersey DEP
Trenton, NJ
Trenton NJ 08625
Brian Runkel
Executive Director
California Environmental Business Council
183 Bering Drive Suite 22
San Jose CA 95112
Rand Shulman
Vice President - H.S. & E.
Shell Oil Products Co./Shell Chemical Co.
P.O. Box 2463
Houston TX 77252
Lawrence Lee Sams
Director, Federal Technical/Business Development
Dow Chemical Company
1776 Eye Street, NW Suite 575
Washington DC 20006
Dr. Marc Siegel
Director
Engineering Process & Information Consulting
12397 Picrus Street
San Diego CA 92129-4113
Robert Savoie
President, CEO
Integrated Resources Group
111 Veterans Blvd., Suite 900
Metalrie LA 70005
Charles Simmons
Vice President
American Electric Power
P.O. Box 2021
Roanoke VA 24022
Mark Schaefer
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Water and Science
U.S. Department of Interior
1849 C Street, NW
Washington DC 20240
Scott Sklar
Executive Vice President
U.S. Export Council for Renewable Energy
777 North Capitol Street, N.W. #805
Washington DC 20002
-------
Glen Skovholt
Vice President, Government & Community Affairs
Honeywell, Inc.
Honeywell Plaza
Minneapolis MN 55408
Maurice Strong
Senior Advisor to the President, World Bank
Technology Development Inc.
1818 H Street NW
Washington DC 20433
Christopher Smith
Senior Vice President
Chemonics International, Inc.
1133 20th St., NW Suite 600
Washington DC 20036
Scott Styles
Washington Representative
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
805 15th Street, NW Suite 410
Washington DC 20005
Peter Snyder
State Government Relations
Air Products & Chemicals
7201 Hamilton Blvd.
Allentown PA 18195
Scott Summers
Director, Kodak Environmental Services
Eastman Kodak Company
1100 Ridgeway Ave
Rochester NY 14652-6652
William Snyder
Program Manager
Border Environmental Business Cluster
477 Marina Parkway
Chula Vista CA 91910
Byron Swift
Director, Technology Center
Environmental Law Institute
1616 P Street, NW Suite 200
Washington DC 20036
Nicole Sparks
Corporate Affairs Specialist
CH2M HILL
6060 S. Willow Drive
Englewood, CO 80111
Dale Tahtinen
Vice President for Government Relations
Michigan Technological University
1400 Townsend Drive
Houghton Ml 49931-1295
Frank Stewart
Manager Golden Field Office
U.S. Department of Energy
1617 Cole Blvd. Bldg 17
Golden CO 80401
John Tao
Corporate Director, Technology Partnerships
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
7201 Hamilton Blvd.
Allentown PA 18195-1501
Paul Douglas Stone
Director, Federal Technolgy & Business Development
Dow Chemical Company
1776 Eye Street, NW Suite 575
Washington DC 20006
C. Bruce Tarter
Director
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
P.O. Box 808, L-001
Livermore CA 94550
-------
Tyrone Taylor
Washington DC Representative
Federal Laboratory Consortium
1850 M Street Suite 800
Washington DC 22036
Kent Troup
Vice President
TEMCOR International, Ltd.
79 West 12th Street Suite 150
New York NY 10011
Gerard Tempest, Jr.
Chairman and CEO
Tempest Environmental Systems, Inc.
101 W. Markham Avenue
Durham NC 27701-1314
Richard Tucker
Senior Vice President
Dames & Morore
7101 Wisconsin Ave
Bethesda MD 20852
Bryan Thomlison
Executive Director
Environmental Technology CHALLENGE
1350 New York Ave., NW 11 th Floor
Washington DC 20005
Steven Turner
President and CEO
L.G.S. Turner and Associates, Ltd.
Robert Tiller
President
ICF Kaiser Hanford Co.
P.O. Box 888/MSIN E6-61
Richland WA 99352
George Vander Velde
Principal
Environmental Planning Group, Inc
3105-D North Wilke Road
Arlington Heights IL 60004
Paul Toback
Senior Vice President
Globetrotters Engineering Corporation
300 South Wacker Drive Suite 200
Chicago IL 60606
Ray Vickery
Assistant Secretary for Trade Development
U.S. Department of Commerce
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington DC 20230
Peter Tramm
Manager, Technology & Research
Allison Engine Company
P.O. Box 420-MC T21
Indianapolis IN 46206
James Watts
President
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers
P.O. Box 524
Richland WA 99352
Alvin Trivelpiece
Director
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
P.O. Box 2008
Oak Ridge TN 37831-6255
Walter Weber
Environmental Studies
University of Michigan, Civil & Environmental Engineering
1351 Beal Avenue Suite 181 EWRE Bldg
Ann Arbor Ml 48109-2125
-------
Richard Westfahl
President
Raytrjeen Environmental Services, Inc.
1250 W. Sam Houston Pkwy. S.
Houston TX 77042
Thomas Zosel
Manager, Environmental Initiatives
3M Company
P.O. Box 3331
St. Paul MN 55133
Emmet James Whitehead
Vice-President/Director of Business Development
Raytheon
1 Broadway
Cambridge MA 02142
Robert Dale Wilson
Partner
Wilson & Wilson
1155 15th Street, NW Suite 815
Washington DC 20005
Kenneth Winger
President
Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 210799, 220 Outlet Pointe Blvd.
Columbia SC 29210
James Wolf
Vice President
The Trane Company
2020 14th Street, North
Arlington VA 22201
Sandra Woods
Vice President & Chief Environmental Officer
Coors Brewing Company
Dept. BC320
Golden CO 80401
Glenn Youngkin
Vice President
The Carlyle Group
1001 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington DC 20004
-------
John Atcheson
Department of Energy
Office of Energy Efficiency
1000 Independence Ave., SW
Washington DC 20585
Brendan Doyle
Senior Policy Advisor
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M St., SW
Washington DC 20460
Jay Benforado
Director, Regulatory Reinvention Team
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW
Washington DC
Jerome Edwards
Principal Scientist
Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.
5665 Flatiron Parkway
Boulder CO 80301
Robert Boyd
Office of the Director - Defense Research & Engineering
U.S. Department of Defense
3080 Defense Pentagon
Washington DC 20301-3080
Peter Fox-Penner
Office of the Deputy Secretary
Department of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue SW
Washington DC 20585
Leslie Cordes
Office of Energy, Environment & Technology
U.S. Agency for International Development
G/ENWEET, SA-18, Room 508
Washington DC 20523
Maryann Froehlich
Director, Office of Policy Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW Room 1005 WT
Washington DC 20460
Jeffrey Crater
Office of Environmental Management
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave., SW
Washington DC 20585
Mark Gilbertson
Office of Science and Technology
U.S. DOE - Off ice of Environmental Management
1000 Independence Ave., SW
Washington DC 20585
Ann Davlin
U.S. Department of Defense
Washington DC 20301-3080
Stuart Goldstein
Office of Energy Research
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue SW
Washington DC 20585
Kevin Doxey
Office of Environmental Security
U.S. Department of Defense
Washington DC 20301-3080
Richard Guimond
Principal Dep. Ass't. Secretary Enviro Management
U. S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave, SW
Washington DC 20585
-------
David Hales
U.S. Agency for International Development
Washington DC 20523
Walter Kovalick
Director, Technology Innovation Office
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW (5102W)
Washington DC 20460
Guy Hammer
Director, Office of Technology Applications
Ballistic Missile Defense Organization
The Pentagon
Washington DC 20301
John Lehr
Office of Environmental Restoration
U.S. DOE - Office of Environmental Management
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington DC 20585
Carol Henry
Office of Science and Technology
U.S. DOE - Office of Environmental Management
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington DC 20585
Amy Manheim
Director, ClimateWise
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue SW
Washington DC 20585
Sarita Hoyt
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
402 M Street, SW
Washington DC 20460
Albert McGartland
Director, Office of Economy and Environment
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M St., SW
Washington DC 20460
Jon Kessler
Director, Emeriging Sectors & Strategies Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW
Washington DC 20460
Carlos Montoulieu
Environmental Technologies Exports
U.S. Department of Commerce
14th & Pennsylvania Ave., NW Room 4324
Washington DC 20230
Jamison Koehler
Director, Office of Technology Cooperation & Assistance
U.S. EPA
401 M Street, SW
Washington, D.C. 20460
William Nitze
Office of International Activities
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street SW
Washington DC 20460
Carla Koppell
Office of Energy, Environment & Technology
U.S. Agency for International Development
G/ENV/EET, SA-18, Room 508
Washington DC 20523
Craig O'Conner
Export-Import Bank of the United States
811 Vermont Avenue, NW
Washington DC 20571
-------
Lewis Reade
Director General
US-Asia Environmental Partnership
U.S. Department of State 321 21st Street, NW, Ste 3208
Washington DC 20523
Sharon Stahl
Special Assistant to the Administrator
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M St., SW
Washington DC 20460
Andrew Reynolds
Oceans, Enviornment and Science
U.S. Department of State
Washington DC 20523
Denise Swink
Dept. of Energy
Washington DC
20585
Kim Sais
Office of Energy, Environment & Technology
U.S. Agency for International Development
G/ENWEET,SA-18, Room 508
Washington DC 20523
Sean Todd
Office of Environmental Management
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave SW
Washington DC 20585
Connie Sasala
Director, Policy and Tech Innovation Div.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M St., SW
Washington DC 20460
Eleanor Tyler
Office of Energy, Environment & Technology
U.S. Agency for International Development
G/ENV/EET.SA-18, Room 508
Washington DC 20523
Jeff Seabright
Director, Office of Energy, Environment & Technology
U.S. Agency for International Development
G/ENV/EET,SA-18, Room 508
Washington DC 20523
William White
Special Assistant
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M St., SW
Washington DC 20460
Jane Siegel
Environmental Technologies Exports
U.S. Department of Commerce
14th & Pennsylvania Ave., NW Room 4324
Washington DC 20230
Marianne Smith
Senior Advisor
U.S. Department of Commerce
14th and Pennsylvania Room 6008
Washington DC 20230
------- |