SUMMARY

WHITE HOUSE BRIEFING
& CONFERENCE ON
ENVIRONMENTAL
TECHNOLOGIES

-------

-------
CONTENTS
Overview
Remarks by Vice-President Al  Gore

The Briefing
   Dr. John H. Gibbons
   Hazel O'Leary
   Fred Hansen
   Brian Atwood
   Sherri Goodman
   Ralph Peterson
   Livio DeSimone
Assistant to the President for Science and Technology
Secretary of Energy
Deputy Administrator, EPA
Administrator, Agency for International Development
Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Environmental
Security, Department of Defense

President & CEO, CH2MHill
Chairman of the Board & CEO, 3M Company
The Roundtables
   Regulatory Reinvention for Technology Innovation
   Building and Improving R&D Partnerships
   Building Federal Facility Partnerships
   Financing Environmental Technologies
   Developing International Markets: From Capacity Building to Exports
The  Participants

-------

-------
Overview
       The global market for environmental goods and services is now estimated at $400 billion
and is expected to grow to $600 billion by the year 2010.Though the opportunities for U.S.
companies are significant, the competition for this  burgeoning  market is fierce.Competing
successfully will require creating and  maintaining long-term partnerships and building  an
entrepreneur-friendly  policy environment which helps  U.S.  industry  turn good ideas into
innovations and marketable products.

       The White House Briefing and Conference on Environmental Technologies, held on April
30, 1996, brought together 200 representatives from industry, the federal government, and other
key sectors to discuss how to facilitate the future development and deployment of environmentally-
critical processes,  products, and practices, both here and  abroad.This event built on  the
commitment made in the National Environmental Technology Strategy to find new ways to expand
the economy while improving environmental quality.The goal of the national strategy was to
strengthen the policies and partnerships between the public and private sectors  needed to
encourage innovation and investment in environmentally-sound technologies, products,  and
practices, both here and abroad.

       The all-day event included a  morning briefing for all participants  which provided an
overview  of  the  National  Environmental  Technology Strategy,  a review  of key federal
environmental technology programs, and an analysis of budgets and funding issues.The briefing
ended with an industry perspective on the competitive implications of environmental technologies
and the role of government programs and public-private partnerships in advancing these
technologies.The briefing was followed by five concurrent roundtables, co-chaired by private  and
public sector leaders, that were convened to delineate specific recommendations needed to sustain
a environmental technology development agenda.  Each roundtable develop a short list of action
items which were presented by the co-chairs to the Vice-President at the end of the day before the
assembled conference.This report  is  a  record of  the  conference and the  associated
recommendations that were taken under advisement by the Vice-President.

-------

-------
Remarks  by


            VICE PRESIDENT AL GORE

[AS PREPARED]

      I would like to thank those members of the Administration and those participants
ftom industry, NGO's, and state and local government who have come together today to work
on an issue of national importance.  I am anxious to hear your recommendations on how we
can advance the development and deployment of mvironmental technologies, but I would like
to begin by sharing with you a few observations.

      As most of you in this room know, it has been a particularly difficult year for
environmental policy and those who make it. This was a year when some members of this
Congress:

      - asserted that DDT was not harmful,

      - compared the EPA with the gestapo, and,

      - maintained that the science underlying the CFC ban is debatable ~ this just 2 weeks
      after the scientists who discovered the relationship between CFC's and ozone depletion
      were awarded the Nobel prize in chemistry.

      But despite the battles, the rhetoric and counterproductive detours, I believe that
historians will look back on the last year as a critical point in the evolution of environmental
policy. Let me explain why.

First, all attempts to turn back the clock on environmental protection failed. This was not
only a triumph of science over ignorance, but a triumph of democracy and public interest over
vested interests.

Second, despite frontal attacks on both environmental policies and budgets, this
Administration was able to put hi place the building blocks of a new system of environmental
protection and management.  We are doing that with programs such as XL and the Common
Sense Initiative.

Third, the number of companies who are pursuing environmental excellence as a competitive
strategy has now reached a critical mass and we are in a unique position to redefine
environmental management together in a way which has enormous competitive implications
for U.S. industry.  3M pioneered this approach over a decade ago with its "Pollution
Prevention Pays" program and it is increasingly becoming a key part of business strategy in
many companies.

-------
 Finally, international activities stimulated through Agenda 21 and other mechanisms have
 ramped up the demand for better environmental protection, policies, and technologies at a
 global level, creating new opportunities for both learning and commerce.

 Those are all positive trends which provide significant .opportunities over the coming months
 and years.

       However, creating a new environmental paradigm which effectively builds on our past
 successes will not be inexpensive or easy. It will require sustained and combined investment
 from both the public and private sectors in research needed to develop a new generation of
 environmentally-critical technologies. It will require a new set of performance-based metrics,
 a new generation of measurement systems, and a wide-spread and credible capacity to audit
 performance. It will require a combined public and private sector focus on results rather than
 methods, on good management practices, and on continuous and rapid improvements in
 process efficiencies and product performance.  And it will require a high level of openness
 and trust between industry, government, and communities. In short, we will need a massive
 investment in "social" capital to move us beyond the confrontational and litigious legacy of
 the command-and-control era.

       The stakes are high. It would be a mistake on our part to think that the U.S. is alone
 in the endeavor to rebuild the system of environmental management.  Other countries,
 Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, the European Union as a whole, have aggressive and
 well-funded programs to reinvent their approaches to environmental protection.  Their
 rationale is like ours: better environmental protection at lower costs and competitive
 positioning for their industries.

       Alan Kay at Apple Computer once noted that:  "The best way to predict the future is
 to invent it" That is our only option.

 Do we want to sit by while a few misguided people in the Congress compromise our ability
 to invest in research necessary to developing a new generation of environmental technologies?

 Do we want to walk away from a 400-billion dollar global market for environmental goods
 and services which in growing at rates exceeding 10 percent per year in many developing
 countries?

 Do we want to turn  our backs on an opportunity to build a new system of environmental
 management which can drive innovation and mobilize capital for decades to come?

 Do we want to give up  the chance to remake the relationship between government, industry,
 and the public after years of distrust and litigation around environmental issues?

I think the answer to these questions is no. Those of you in this room can help us invent the
future.

-------
The   Briefing
                                John H. Gibbons
            Assistant to the President for Science and Technology

       In the early 1970's, the government set the national regulatory framework which would
shape an entire generation of environmental technologies. By defining the rules of the game we
effectively defined the nature and rate of technological development, directed capital flows, and
shaped environmental markets for decades. Three years ago, this Administration set out to rebuild
this framework, to make sure our environmental policies provide  a competitive advantage to
industry, not a competitive burden,  and are optimized for environmental performance,  for
technological excellence, for social equity, and for economic competitiveness.

       In July 1994, the Vice President asked us to put the best minds in this country together
to think about how we could advance the development and deployment of environmentally-sound
processes, products, and practices, both here and abroad.  In a series of more than two dozen
events held  across the United States, we  met with over 10,000 representatives from industry,
academia, NGO's, and state and local government to discuss how to advance the development
and deployment of environmental technologies. The result of this work was the National
Environmental Technology Strategy released during Earth Week, 1995. As part of that strategy
we are working to reinvent the  regulatory system, help verify and demonstrate environmental
technologies, support R&D on environmentally-critical technologies, help  businesses move
environmental technologies into foreign markets, and in general, build a  more  responsive,
integrated, and consistent system of programs and policies. We .hope to use this conference to
advance our strategy, to identify any  bottlenecks ~ technological, organizational, or financial --
which stand in our way and develop  effective ways to deal with these obstacles.

        We stand  at a crossroads of environmental  policy. The choices we make over the next
 months and  years will drive environmental innovation far into the next century. Budgets for many
 key  environmental technology  programs are  under  attack in  the  Congress. However,  this
 Administration remains committed to environmental technology programs and to achieving both
 economic and environmental protection goals while meeting our budget deficit reduction targets.
 We will work with all  relevant stakeholder to make sure this-happens.

-------
                                    Hazel O Leary
                                 Secretary of Energy


        All nations of the world are facing unprecedented economic and environmental challenges.
 As^with all great challenges, however, there are also great opportunities.  The environmental
 technology market is a multi-billion dollar opportunity and growing rapidly.   For the countries
 and companies that seize this opportunity, the result can be significant social, economic and other
 advantages, not the least of which is high paying jobs.   Our challenge is to figure how we can
 work together to make sure that the US keeps its lead in this exploding  marketplace.

        Many  US companies are ahead of the curve and reaping the  direct benefits of the
 environmental technology market. Other forward-looking  companies that include users as well
 as developers of some of these technologies ~ 3M, Weyerhauser, DOW and others ~ are leading
 the  way in environmentally-friendly operations.    These latter  companies  are proving that
 businesses that are well managed, reduce wastes, cut emissions and prevent incidents will succeed
 in tomorrow s global markets.

        At DOE, many of our pollution prevention and environmental technologies R&D programs
 are yielding the same kinds of rewards.   For example, wind, photovoltaics and biofuels have
 been made significantly more cost-effective as a result of DOE technology investments.  A GAO
 audit of our programs showed that returns from just five  technologies more than paid for the
 entire Energy Efficiency  budget from 1978-1996 - and that s just the return attributable to the
federal contribution. We have great expectations for our ongoing partnerships with industry, such
 as the Industries of the Future project, and it is encouraging that entire industries are seizing their
 own opportunities.  Restructuring of the electricity industry will also provide a large opportunity
 for utilities to become more efficient and to provide  additional environmental  benefits.

        Against this backdrop, we may be about to squander the lead that the US has built in
 tomorrows technologies, even with this substantial track record and a citizenry that  demands
 a clean, healthy, and sustainable world.   Congress  is proposing drastic  cuts  in areas such  as
 energy  efficiency and pollution prevention technologies, advanced transportation technologies,
 and many  other relevant R&D programs.   While the .U.S. is cutting back, our international
 competitors are increasing both private and public investments in environmental technology.

       This Administration has done a remarkable thing: it has made us work  together towards
 common goals, and it has been consistent about what those  goals are. We have created millions
 of new jobs and expanded the economy while preserving and improving  the environment. We
 must continue this work together.  We must develop the needed technologies, reinvent our
 regulations to stimulate innovation, build partnerships and  use  our federal facilities as  testbeds
 and innovation incubators.   We must design policies and programs that  help  capitalize on the
 huge export market and we must design ways of stimulating the investment that we need.  As
 an administration, we believe that we  can prosper economically only if we take  care of ourselves
 and our planet, and we can take care of our planet only if  we prosper economically.

-------
                                   Fred Hansen
                               Deputy Administrator
                     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

       EPA is  committed to  reinventing the regulatory framework to reach our  national
environmental goals.  Some people have  interpreted our drive for reinvention to mean more
flexibility within the current regulatory system. And that s partly true.  Others think reinvention
means more  incentives  for developing cheaper,  more  efficient ways  to prevent or control
pollution. And that s also partly  true.  But reinvention is more than flexibility and efficiency.
It s a new way  of thinking about the future ~ of reaching the future.  That future is a place
where the  environmental protection system  implements itself,  where companies  continually
improve  their environmental performance.

       There will always be a  role for government in addressing environmental problems and
ensuring  the compliance of those not willing to do so on their own.   But we want  to work
towards an  environmental protection system that encourages continuous improvement, where the
issue is no  longer simply compliance, but  moving steadily beyond compliance.  All of us want
to create  a  new system that takes us into the 21st century.  But innovation isn t free. We need
to invest  both public and private resources.  EPA wants to continue working with state and local
governments to make these needed investments in the future.

       The Administration s environmental technology efforts are being integrated  across the
federal government.  The new  ideas that we re testing and supporting at EPA  complement the
initiatives underway at  other  agencies.   In  1994,  at the first White  House Conference  on
Environmental Technology, we stated that we were changing our approach to environmental
protection.  Since that time, we ve worked with our public and private stakeholders to provide
new tools  and  models for  encouraging innovation.  For example, we have established the
Environmental  Technology Verification  Program to verify the performance of innovative
technologies and move them into the marketplace.  Under Project XL, we have more than  40
pending pilot proposals that would do away with certain regulatory requirements in exchange for
better performance.  EPA is working with all of our stakeholders to implement a performance-
based system for better environmental protection.

-------
                                   Brian Atwood
                                   Administrator
                   U.S. Agency for International Development

       By helping the developing world meet its needs via more environmentally responsible
means, we can work to ameliorate global environmental problems and expand markets for U.S.
environmental technologies at the same time. Developing countries represent the fastest growing
markets for  U.S. exports, and as these countries modernize, their  demand for U.S.  goods will
continue to  increase.  In the environmental area, the global market for goods and  services is
estimated to be $400 billion, 60% of which lies outside of the U.S. This market is expected to
double in coming decades with developing countries making up the largest part of the growth.
Massive opportunities will present themselves in the areas of industrial pollution prevention,
energy  efficiency,  renewable  energy,  sustainable agriculture,  forestry  and coastal  zone
management, preservation of biodiversity,  and improved urban infrastructure  services such as
water and solid waste management.

       Last  year we provided $700 million  in environmental technical assistance and training in
Asia, Latin America, Africa, Central Europe and the Newly Independent States.  Our leadership
role in steering the developing world toward environmentally sound and responsible development
paths must continue.   Not only  do we benefit the citizens of developing countries in terms of
improved quality of life, we benefit our own country economically.  All  these lessen  global
environmental deterioration,  an  ever-increasing threat as the world population and consumption
patterns continue to rise at unprecedented rates.
                                  Sherri Goodman
        Deputy Undersecretary for Defense for Environmental Security
                              Department of Defense

       We at the Department of Defense have a long history of meeting our Nation's military
challenges and our people, technological and scientific expertise, and industrial base are National
assets.   We are fully committed  to  meeting this nation's environmental challenges and have
requested that Congress authorize approximately $4.7 billion for environmental programs. Within
this request, we plan to invest over $179 million in environmental technologies with over $54
million implemented in full partnership with DOE and EPA.

       We believe that environmental technologies can help us accomplish four goals: achieve
greater operational savings and mitigate future liabilities; improve  performance  and enhance
warfighting capability; meet environmental  obligations in a cost-effective manner; and ensure
access to air, water, and land so that we can conduct training. DoD will play an important role
in the implementation of the National  Environmental Technology Strategy  and our federal
facilities working together, and in partnership, with the States and industry can be a great catalyst
to technological advancement.

-------
                                  Ralph Peterson
                                 President & CEO
                           CH2M Hill Companies, Ltd.

       U.S environmental policy is at a critical cross-roads and receiving scrutiny from all sides
including Congress,  government officials, regulators, industry, and environmental groups.  There
is  a surprisingly high appetite for policy reform among a wide spectrum of stakholders yet
significant, and divisive, disagreements persist on exactly how to proceed. Maybe this is because
the framework of U.S. environmental policy is so deeply rooted in an adversarial process.
However,  our  economic and environmental future depends upon moving beyond the existing,
and often  counterproductive, debates.
       A durable path forward for U.S. environmental policy will require that a central mission
of that policy  be the enhancement of technological change.  We will not have solutions  which
allow us to meet high environmental standards better, faster and cheaper,  unless technological
innovation is stimulated, not stymied, by environmental policies.
       The work undertaken to develop and implement the National Environmental Technology
Strategy provides us with the building blocks to develop a new consensus between government
and industry.  This  event provides us with a valuable forum and a great opportunity to build on
that foundation; to set a common direction for government and industry — working together ~
in which  environmental stewardship is an integral part of our national and global   economic
interests.                               :
                                   Livio DeSimone
                         Chairman of the Board and  CEO
                                    3M Company

       This event is  important from several  standpoints.  First, it reflects increasing global
 emphasis on sustainable development — on the convergence of ecological and economic interests.
 Second,  it acknowledges the  role of emerging, environmentally  compatible technologies in
 achieving a more sustainable planet.  And, third, it promotes the theme of A Common Direction
for Business and Government — emphasizing the key role of partnerships.
       The idea of partnering toward a sustainable future is a global phenomena and is gaining
 momentum.  I am privileged to serve as chair of the World  Business Council for Sustainable
 Development,  an organization of more than  120 companies worldwide.  From the WBCSD
 perspective,  I see a growing acknowledgement in the business world that concurrent economic
 and environmental progress is both  possible...and necessary.     With this shift in perspective
 comes an increased focus on the role of technology and technological innovation in meeting the
 challenges posed by sustainable development.
       Addressing tne challenge of sustainable development requires us to accept change, face
 complexity, embrace innovation, and essentially facilitate a paradigm shift.  We have to unleash
 the imagination and the power of individuals and develop new policies which not only remove
 the obstacles  to innovation, but encourage innovation itself.

-------

-------
The  Roundtables
     Regulatory Reinvention for Technology Innovation

     Building and Improving R&D Partnerships

     Building Federal Facility Partnerships

     Financing Environmental Technologies

     Developing International Markets:
          From Capacity Building to Exports
     The following section of this Conference  Report contains summaries of the
Roundtables and the Recommendations that were presented at the end of the Conference.
It should be noted that any follow-up or action items listed in this section were suggestions
by the participants in the Rountables.

-------

-------
ROUNDTABLE: Regulatory Reinvention for Technology Innovation

Co-Chairs

Fred Hansen, Deputy Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
John W. Creighton, Jr., President & CEO, Weyerhaeuser Company

Purpose

The purpose of this Roundtable was to help advance one of the primary goals of the National
Environmental Technology  Strategy (NETS):  "Achieve continuous  improvement of the
environmental performance of U.S. industries, using the most advanced technologies and
cost-effective means possible, by strengthening incentives for innovation within the regulatory
system."
Background

Through various meetings leading up to the creation of the NETS, stakeholders voiced a common
need - to provide incentives for innovative regulatory and non-regulatory environmental
management approaches and to reduce barriers to innovation in the regulatory structure. In
particular, the notions of performance, flexibility and accountability were commonly cited as the
fundamental elements of a more adaptive system where the rapid development and deployment
of new, innovative technology would be common practice. The Environmental Protection Agency
has responded to this need by creating and testing a series of flexible, performance-based
 approaches to environmental protection, with requisite accountability. These approaches provide
 strong incentives to create and use new technologies in the U.S. and abroad, facilitating improved
 environmental performance and economic competitiveness.
                                    i
 Discussion Topics

 The Roundtable began with a brief overview of EPA's performance-based "building blocks" for
 a new system. The overview outlined the successes and the remaining challenges of those
 approaches currently being tested (e.g., Project XL, emissions trading, etc.). The majority of the
 Roundtable consisted of a dialogue with industry and other stakeholders that focused on several
 cross-cutting issues associated with performance-based approaches. These issues included (but
 were not limited to): (1) Defining and Measuring Performance: what analytical and technical
 tools are needed to  help define and  measure performance? (2) Engendering  Trust and
 Commitment: what actions can be taken to build trust among the regulated and non-regulated
 communities that will instill their commitment to a new performance-based system? (3) Providing
 Additional Incentives: what are other actions that can  be  taken to improve  environmental
 performance and economic competitiveness?

 Expected Outcomes

 Roundtable participants prioritized cross-cutting issues, and proposed public/private efforts to
 address these issues. Discussion results were reported at the Plenary Roundtable.

-------
 ROUNDTABLE: Regulatory Reinvention for Technology Innovation

 SUMMARY of RECOMMENDATIONS

 EPA is currently testing a number of performance-based approaches that are designed to achieve
 superior environmental performance by allowing greater regulatory flexibility.  These include:
 Environmental Leadership Program; ETI Flexible CAA Title V Permitting; Design for Environment
 Program; and Project XL. Stakeholder participation and support are vital to the acceptance and
 broader application of these approaches.  Additional emphasis should be placed on public outreach
 to^ensure there is trust and widespread understanding that these new approaches will  result in
 superior performance rather than degradation in environmental quality.

 ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RECOMMENDED

 Defining and Measuring Performance

 General consensus:   To move to a system aimed at achieving  continuous improvement in
 environmental performance, we need to go beyond discharge monitoring to look more holistically
 at effects on public health and the environment (e.g., ambient monitoring, biomarkers).  Also, third-
 party certification of performance, as a substitute for government auditing, should be fully explored.

 Action item: EPA will convene federal agencies, industry, environmental organizations, and others,
 to establish strategic directions and specific next steps for RD&D  and application of advanced
 monitoring technologies to performance-based programs.

 Engendering Trust and Commitment

 General consensus: Information that is verifiable and transparent is the foundation for acceptance
 of performance-based approaches.  Increasing trust depends upon  continued attention to good
 science and mutual respect for environmental and economic goals.

Action item:  In consultation with all stakeholders, EPA will evaluate early results from the new
 performance-based  programs, and  identify refinements  necessary  to achieve  continuous
 environmental improvement through regulatory flexibility.

 Providing Additional Incentives

 General consensus: There are existing incentives for improving environmental performance which
 need to be refined and publicized. However, there continue to be disincentives to innovation within
 the regulatory framework.

Action item:  EPA, through Project XL, will solicit proposals for testing innovative technologies
as a way to achieve additional environmental benefits. Also, in consultation with stakeholders, EPA
will expand its efforts to eliminate disincentives to new technologies.

-------
ROUNDTABLE: Building and Improving R&D Partnerships

Co-chairs

Charles Curtis, Deputy Secretary, US Department of Energy
Dr. William E. Coyne, Senior Vice President, R&D, 3M Co.

Purpose

This breakout session brought together outstanding leaders from industry and government to discuss
ways to build and improve R&D partnerships. Such  partnerships  are critical for providing
cost-effective solutions to existing environmental problems and for developing the next generation
of environmentally-sound products, processes, and practices.

Background

The US currently enjoys a lead in key environmental technologies, but our competitors are increasing
public and private investments in this crucial sector at a time when US investments have been stagnant
for 5 years. We are not  only failing to keep pace with our competitors' investments. Increasingly,
industry  is focusing on  near-term objectives  and the legitimacy of government investment and
government-industry partnerships is being questioned. Our challenge then, is to design ways that help
us retain our lead in the  environmental technologies of the future; that help us meet and better our
international competition; that assure that we have the technological tools needed to build a safer,
more prosperous, and sustainable world.

Discussion Topics

R&D - The Context: Administration initiatives and budgets — what we are doing, why it adds value;
Congressional proposals; long term trends. What is working? What needs improvement? What are
competitor countries doing?

Defining roles; How can we establish appropriate roles for both the public and private sectors which
build on our respective strengths and responsibilities?

Establishing partnerships that work; Based on discussion of several models, effective mechanisms
were defined, and a blueprint for more effective partnerships was developed. Areas for new potential
partnerships to develop environmentally-critical technologies were explored.

Expected Outcomes

The group developed recommendations for the Plenary Roundtable designed to assure that public and
private sector  R&D investments for environmental technologies are leveraged; that government
resources are directed appropriately, and that they are administratively easy to access and functionally
easy to use.

-------
ROUNDTABLE: Building and Improving R&D Partnerships
SUMMARY of RECOMMENDATIONS

By and large, it was viewed that government actions over the last few years to work more closely
with and as a partner to the private sector were a step in the right direction. However, more can and
should be done. Specific examples mentioned by the group of some successful programs include XL,
Industries of the Future, and the Remediation Technology Development Forum.
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RECOMMENDED

Improve Access to, and Performance of, Federal Resources

•      Use and Cost of National Laboratories:

             — We should continue to reduce Administrative complexity and the time it takes to
             work with the Labs;

             ~ Where appropriate and feasible, overhead allocations should be re-examined to
             ensure that they are fair and reasonable to all parties;

             ~ Enhance and encourage interagency laboratory efforts; streamline access for other
             agencies, where possible.

•      Continue to streamline the CRADA process, but expand use of alternative agreements.
       Cooperative mechanisms should  safeguard intellectual property rights,  and assign them
       clearly.

•      Use Government as a customer and procurer to stimulate R&D; to verify and demonstrate
       performance of innovative technologies:

             —One possible idea — dedicated fund  for purchasing innovative  environmental
             technologies.

•      Keep universities as an integral and strong part of the national research infrastructure.

-------
ROUNDTABLE: Building and Improving R&D Partnerships


ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RECOMMENDED

Make Regulations Innovation-Friendly and Make EPA a More Productive Partner

•      Better align EPA mid-level and field policies with EPA directions.

•      Improve incentives and resources for EPA field staff who must bear the risks of applying
       innovative technologies; one idea - an "innovation ombudsperson" in each region.

•      Indemnification is still a significant issue impeding new technologies; no incentives exist if
       bringing new technologies to solve environmental problems creates new exposures to liability.

•      Regulatory Reinvention needs technological tools such as new ways of producing goods, new
       ways of monitoring (facility-based and fenceline monitoring).  Also, government follow-
       through on setting goals and subsequent enforcement is important. R&D policy needs to be
       integrated and an industry/government study panel should take this further.

•      Regulators are customers too ~ they should be involved in efforts early and often.

Experiment with New Ways of Partnering

•      Pilot and reward innovation and success, especially through XL.

•      Build on and expand successful models,  such as:

       —Industries of the Future - industry driven, sector-wide strategic agendas which provide
       technology roadmaps and allow public investment where necessary, appropriate, and cost-
       effective. (Agenda 20/20 etc.)

       —Remediation Technology Development Forum - extensive stakeholder involvement that
       allowed  innovative cleanup approaches endorsed by state and federal agencies, NGOs,
       adjacent communities, and contractors.

-------

-------
ROUNDTABLE: Building Federal Facilities Partnerships

Co-Chairs

Sherri Goodman, Deputy Under Secy of Defense (Environmental Security), DOD
Thomas P. Grumbly, Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management, DOE
James Edwards, Chief-Executive-Officer, ICF Kaiser International, Incorporated

Purpose

The purpose of this session was to examine new approaches for the use of economic incentives to
advance two of the primary goals from the National Environmental Technology Strategy (NETS):
"Ensure that the federal government becomes a more accessible partner with the private sector in
advancing the development of environmental technologies", and "Accelerate and facilitate the
demonstration of promising technologies -while reducing the costs".

Background

In the past year, Federal agencies have developed programs to include incentives for action in
procurement policies,  contract reform, innovative public  and private partnerships. All  of these
programs  seek  to  encourage investment  for  environmental  improvement and  technology
advancement. Continued progress in these areas requires a common plan for Federal agencies to make
environmental technology demonstration and advancement more accessible across agencies, states,
and facilities. An important goal is to speed up the process of developing and implementing programs
on a wide scale to move past the pilot phase and into the demonstration phase, and ultimately, into
the marketplace.

Discussion Topics

 The Roundtable provided a brief overview and examples where progress has been made and the
 challenges that remain. Opportunities to enhance existing partnerships between federal, state, and
 local agencies and the private sector were identified. The discussion allowed participants to exchange
 ideas, that would encourage government/ industry partnerships  and identified an action plan to
 accelerate environmental technology implementation as well as to promote a proactive public policy.
 Areas  for  discussion included: (1) Acquisition policies  to enhance pollution  prevention;  (2)
 Regulatory reinvention; (3) Technology demonstration, use and acceptance; and (4)  Contract
 reform—incentives for actions and innovation.

 Expected Outcomes

 Roundtable participants proposed incentives: (1) to foster reciprocity processes for technology
 demonstration, validation and certification; (2) for performance-based regulatory requirements and
 technology verification procedures; and (3) to promote the use qf Federal facilities as test beds for
 technology demonstration.

-------
ROUNDTABLE:  Building Federal Facilities Partnerships
SUMMARY of RECOMMENDATIONS

The Roundtable  recommends that a process be developed  that expedites  reciprocity  for
environmental technology demonstration use and permitting across states and federal facilities.
This process would apply across agencies and across states.

The Roundtable encourages Federal agencies to use their facilities as test beds for technology
demonstration and use, for both government and industry application.

The Roundtable recognizes that regulatory reinvention depends on moving as rapidly as possible
to performance-based standards that focus on  outcomes, determined by return on investment.
We should make sure that the contractor and government workforce is properly trained to apply
performance-based  standards in contracting, technology and  regulation.  For example,  the
National Performance Review should recognize that acquisition reform has produced significant
environmental benefits by enabling the Federal government and industry to adopt commercial
performance-based standards.

The Roundtable recommends that the Federal Government place a top priority on programs and
actions that focus on Stakeholder/decisionmaker partnerships for the purpose of joint problem
solving for environmental improvement. These would include:  Government/industry; Labor/
management; Government with stakeholders; and Government/industry collaboration with non-
U.S. entities.

The Roundtable  recommends  that government should  continue  its  push to incentivize
innovation for environmental programs for both contractors and government personnel at Federal
Facilities.     Government  should be   encouraged  to  take  advantage  of  privatization
activities/opportunities in a fashion that includes organized labor, as appropriate.

The Roundtable recommends that early on in the R&D process, that technology developers  are
able to obtain the rights to a technology  in order to facilitate financing, commercialization, etc.
Special emphasis should be placed on small businesses, and the use of Federal facilities  for
demonstration and validation.

-------
ROUNDTABLE: Financing Environmental Technologies

Co-Chairs

John P. DeVillars,  Regional Administrator, USEPA, Region One
Maurice Strong, Chairman, Technology Development Incorporated
                (Senior Advisor to the President of the World Bank)

Purpose

The purpose of this Roundtable was to help advance one of the primary goals of the National
Enviromental Technology Strategy  (NETS): "Ensure that adequate investment capital is available
for the development, commercialization, and use of environmental technologies."  Discussions
focused on the issues of financing environmental technologies, products, and practices from both the
demand and the supply sides of the marketplace.

Background

In order to focus principally on those issues most relevant to finance, discussions at this rouridtable
began by assuming that participants in the other  four roundtables (R&D,  Federal Facilities,
International/Exports, and Regulatory Reinvention) would all be successful in achieving significant
progress  towards  their stated objectives. That  is, they would be able to develop  incentives for
innovative regulatory and non-regulatory environmental management approaches, reduce barriers to
innovation, speed up the commercialization process, facilitate the aggregation of markets, and,
generally, improve the climate for both short and long-term investment in environmental solutions.
Discussion then move  on to determine: What  else  is necessary, if anything,  to increase capital
 availability for environmental technologies?  Also considered was the question: What changes in
 other areas are most crucial to increase capital supply and market demand?

 Discussion Topics

 The following topics were addressed: (1) Relationship between "market dynamics" and "finance", i.e.,
 What are the linkages, barriers and incentives? (2) Types of capital and issues unique to each: Venture
 Capital,  Growth  Capital (Debt and Equity), Funds (Pension, Sector-specific), Insurance, Public
 Sector; (3) What are the roles, impacts and perspectives of credit rating agencies, SEC, ISO, etc. (4)
 What 'are  the  "tools" available to effect the problem: Tax, fiscal,  accounting, market-based
 instruments, credit trading programs, risk reduction programs, public sector purchasing decisions, etc.

 Expected Outcomes

 Roundtable participants developed a prioritized list of (1) issues and recommendations specific to
 finance, and (2) issues  and  recommendations which were cross-cutting and  relevant  to other
 roundtable discussions.  The results and conclusions were then reported to the Vice-President in the
 Plenary Roundtable session.

-------
ROUNDTABLE: Financing Environmental Technologies

SUMMARY of RECOMMENDATIONS

       There is abundant capital in both the US and International financial markets. This capital
is flowing to areas of growth and opportunity, such as biotechnology and information systems.
 The past year has  brought broad awareness to the importance of implementing new policies
which  shape and harnesses market forces  towards eco-efficiency.  Environmental technologies
and markets, as they exist  currently, have too many moving variables - which substantially
increase the risks and lower the potential returns on investment capital relative to other industries.

       At present there are few policies or programs in existence which address the issue of
private capital flows into environmental technologies and markets.  Efforts at the EPA with
Project XL, the Verification  Centers, the Center for Environmental Industry and Technology, etc
are examples of public sector facilitation which will be constructive if allowed to mature.
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RECOMMENDED
Performance-Based Approaches:
     Action Item
                      To- re-cast regulations, contracting and purchasing to be more flexible,
                       performance and incentive oriented.

                      More setting standards and monitoring compliance, with less focus on
                                  the methods used to meet or exceed standards.

                      Independent, 3d party auditing systems (similar to the Securities
                                  Exchange Commission for financial markets supervision).

     Responsibility  Lead organizing responsibility, EPA in coordination with DOE, DOD,
                    DOC, GSA (e.g. the Regulatory Reinvention Roundtable with outreach).

Full cost accounting

     Action Item    A joint public/private initiative to focus on environmental cost accounting
                    issues. Outline what actions are necessary to assist organizations to further
                    develop and adopt accounting practices that link environmental costs with
                    the products, processes, and activities  that generate them.  The objective
                    is to better  inform  business  decisions  and  help companies justify
                    environmentally-beneficial  investments both  internally  and to external
                    financial institutions.  Explore the  possibility  of working with a specific
                    industry to map its environmental  activities and measure the associated
                    costs.

     Responsibility  Lead organizing responsibility, OSTP in coordination with  PCSD.

-------
ROUNDTABLE: Financing Environmental Technologies

ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RECOMMENDED

Government as buyer and risk mitigator

     Action Item    Government must "behave" better as a buyer and contractor. Must match
                    contracting terms to length of the sectors needs.  Can act as "insurer" for
                    certain pieces of the risk curve which are within the control of government.
                    Participation  to  include GSA,  private  sector capital  providers  and
                    potentially OMB, Treasury.

     Responsibility  Lead responsibility, OSTP in coordination with DOE, DOD and EPA

Bonus/Incentive for early adapters

     Action Item    Incentives to induce capital  and management effort. Could be tax credits,
                    lending, preferred government buying, etc.

     Responsibility  Lead organizing responsibility, EPA with DOE.

Information

     Action Item    Omnibudsman and One-Stop-Shop  Concept. Better systems for collecting
                    and utilizing information, including info on "markets" and spending like
                    the "PACE" series at DOC  and the "Enviro Statistics Center" at EPA.

     Responsibility  Lead organizing responsibility, IETO.

 Voluntary Approaches

     Action Item     Sullivan Standards, ISO  14000, etc

      Responsibility   Lead organizing responsibility, OSTP with PCSD.

 Coordinating Functions

      Action Item     It is important to coordinate finance recommendations with all four other
                     RT's,  but in particular  with Regulatory Reinvention.  Recommend the
                     creation of a "Financial Coordinating Council" to act as a cross-walk and
                  /s  common ground for the purpose  of maximizing the increased flow of
                     private capital. To include DOE, DOD, DOC.

      Responsibility  Lead organizing responsibility, EPA.

-------
ROUNDTABLE: Financing Environmental Technologies
Observations on capital availability at points on the Technolgy Development curve:
     R&D
     Demo
     Development
     Commercialization
     Growth
     Export
     Start-up Companies
     Small Companies
     Large Companies
Not addressed in this Roundtable
Verification programs will help reduce risk
Gov't can help by "purchasing technology"
Gov't as "insurer" plus risk mitigation programs
Liquidity facilitating programs (e.g.,  Fannie Mae)
Not addressed in this Roundtable
Private action if Gov't moves to "performance-based regs"
SBA should consider a more focused program here
Can improve with better contracting by Public Sector

-------
ROUNDTABLE: Developing International  Markets:
                    From Capacity Building to Exports

Co-Chairs

Stuart Eizenstat, Under Secy for International Trade, DOC
Don Deieso, CEO and President, Metcalf & Eddy Company

Purpose

This  Rountable sought to advance the  complementary objectives of the Environmental
Technologies Export Initiative, which aims to support global sustainable development while
enhancing the international competitiveness of the U.S. environmental technologies.

Background

Development of international environmental markets is critical to achieving global sustainable
development, and to supporting greater U.S.  economic growth, jobs,  and exports.  The
environmental technologies sector is one of the fastest growing industry sectors worldwide. The
current global market for envirotech is estimated at about $400 billion and is projected to reach
$600 billion by the year 2010. Competition for this burgeoning market is fierce; and despite the
U.S. industry's vast experience and technological leadership in this sector, it is not realizing its
full commercial potential in the international marketplace.

Discussion Topics

The two key sections of the Roundtable provided a brief overview of the Administration's
comprehensive strategy under the Initiative. One section discussed programs aimed at "building"
environmental markets, particularly those programs focused on human and institutional capacity
building via technical assistance and training. The other key section focused on programs which
more directly assist and facilitate U.S. exports of envirotech -business counseling and outreach,
 export promotion, financing, advocacy. Dialogue at the Roundtable drew on the private sector
 participants' experiences, with these programs and in the international marketplace, to illustrate
what works and what  does not work. Further discussions considered the special needs of
 different types of companies or in specific envirotech sectors, how the competition is addressing
 the same issues and how U.S. public-private efforts can address these challenges.

 Expected Outcomes

 Roundtable participants prioritized the key issues and recommended specific public-private
 efforts, in the short-to-medium term, to address those issues.

-------
ROUNDTABLE: Developing International  Markets:
                    From Capacity Building to Exports


SUMMARY of RECOMMENDATIONS

The Clinton Administration's Environmental Technologies  Export Initiative is providing  a
comprehensive and targeted strategy to support global sustainable development while enhancing the
international competitiveness of the U.S. environmental technologies industry and its exports of
goods and services.  A close public-private partnership throughout the Initiative is resulting in a more
successful and efficient delivery of assistance to the U.S. envirotech industry.
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RECOMMENDED

 Public-Private Partnerships New, strategic public-private partnerships that respond to industry
needs and input are essential to increasing U.S. market share in the rapidly growing world market for
environmental technologies. Our competitors have long used this approach to achieve success in
international markets and U.S. firms now operate at a relative competitive disadvantage.

Recommendation(s):  (a) Provide a high-level USG platform for the release of the Environmental
Technology Trade Advisory Committee's (ETTAC) recommendations to the interagency Trade
Promotion Coordinating Committee (TPCC). (b) Work with the private sector to implement key
ETTAC recommendations, such as the development of industry consortia that enhance the trade
competitiveness of U.S. environmental companies, with a special emphasis on SMEs, which account
for a large proportion of the sector.

Action Item(s):   (a)   In  September '96, the  ETTAC will  present a report and specific
recommendations to the Secretary of Commerce and the TPCC agencies. These recommendations
from the 35-member ETTAC will address numerous issues related to envirotech exports, including:
financing, budget and resource allocation, advocacy, interagency coordination, and disincentives to
trade,  (b)  In June 1996, the Department of Commerce and the Department of Justice granted an
Export Trading Company Certificate  to the Water and Waste Water Equipment Manufacturers
Association (WWEMA).  This first-ever certificate to the envirotech industry,  issued under the 1982
Export Trading Act, protects 25 WWEMA member companies from state and federal government
antitrust actions, thus facilitating actions that will enhance their  trade competitiveness  (e.g., the
establishment of consortia, sharing of cost/price information, etc).

-------
ROUNDTABLE: Developing  International Markets:
                    From Capacity Building to Exports
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RECOMMENDED

Environmental Industry Classification System.  There is insufficient and inconsistent definition
and data on the envirotech industry. A specific and complete industry classification system is
needed to clearly understand the composition of the envirotech industry, its contributions to the
economy and trade, and its international competitiveness.

Recommendation: Launch a comprehensive review and survey of the envirotech industry in order
to develop a more useful and accurate industry classification system and data.

Action Item: By end of summer 1996, the Department of Commerce and EPA will conduct the first-
ever comprehensive survey of the envirotech industry through a sample of approximately 7-10,000
U.S. companies.  This information will help develop a classification system and instruments needed
for periodic benchmarking of the industry (e.g., quinquennial censuses).

States Envirotech Initiative. Fostering greater envirotech exports development programs  at the
state and local level is essential to: 1) counteract decreasing federal budgets and programs; 2) focus
greater delivery of assistance to SMEs that dominate this sector; and 3) advance the Administration's
efforts to empower states and support their programs.

Recommendation:  Develop a "States Envirotech Exports Initiative" focused  on  expanding and
strengthening  cooperation among state and  local  economic development agencies  and  trade
associations to increase envirotech exports.

Action Item(s): (a) Follow up to the States Environmental Exports Forum, held during Earth  Week
1996, which successfully brought together representatives from more than 20 states and unveiled
state trade data demonstrating the contribution of the sector to  each state's economy; (b) In
coordination with key state representatives, develop an action plan and organizational structure to
carry out the initiative (e.g., a states-industry led  secretariat), (c) Develop a pilot demonstration
project focused on the state of California which has the largest envirotech industry in the U.S., and
is very active in the development of envirotech markets and exports.

-------
ROUNDTABLE: Developing International Markets:
                    From Capacity Building to Exports
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS RECOMMENDED

Financing Exports/Use of Tied Aid.  Adequate financing is key to the goal of increasing U.S.
envirotech exports.  The USG must offer competitive financing terms to enhance U.S. industry's
ability to compete in the international envirotech market, particularly in the fast growing emerging
markets.
Recommendation:
envirotech sector.
Counter our competitors' use  of preferential financing and tied aid in the
Action Item(s): Provide a priority focus to environment-related exports in the programs of the United
States Export-Import Bank.  Currently, the Ex-Im Bank aggressively supports U.S. envirotech
exports through its Environmental Business Development Program, which offers environmental
companies special terms and conditions not available to the exports of other sectors; and through the
use of its Tied Aid Capital Projects Fund, which is aimed at countering the trade-distorting tied aid
and concessionary financing which often faces U.S. companies in foreign markets.

-------
The Participants

-------

-------
 Lilia Abron
 President
 PEER Consultants, PC
 12300 Twinbrook Parkway  Suite 410
 Rockville  MD  20852
                                         Joe Newton Austin, Jr.
                                         Consultant
                                         ICI Americas
                                         8403 Arlington Blvd., Suite 100
                                         Fairfax VA  22031
. Edward Aghjayan
 General Manager, Public Utilities Department
 City of Anaheim, Anaheim Public Utilities
 201 South Anaheim Blvd. #1101
 Anaheim  CA  92805
                                         Robert Darryl Banks
                                         Director, Program in Technology and the Environment
                                         World Resources Institute
                                         1709 New York Avenue, NW
                                         Washington  DC  20006
 Vincent Albanese
 Vice President, U.S. Marketing and Sales
 Nalco Fuel Tech
 P.O. Box 3031
 Naperville  IL
                                         Suzanne Bass
                                         State - Federal Liason
                                         Texas Natrual Resource Conservation Commission
                                         122 C Street, NW Suite 122
                                         Washington  DC   20001
 Ronald Allen
 President
 Alenco International, Inc.
 735 Commerce Circle
 Longwood FL  32750
                                         Robert Bauer
                                         Director, Strategic Competency Development
                                         Xerox PARC
                                         3333 Coyote Hill Road
                                         Palo Alto CA  94304
 Alvin Aim
 Director and Sector Vice President
 Science Applications International Corporation
 1710 Goodrich Drive
 McLean VA  22102
                                         Dennis E. Beach
                                         Vice-President - Administration
                                         Chaparral Steel
                                         300 Ward Rd
                                         Midlothian  TX  76065-9651
 Anne Alonzo
 Deputy Assistant Secretary
 U.S. Department of Commerce
 14th & Pennsylvania Ave., NW Room 4324
 Washington  DC  20230
                                         David J. Beightol
                                         Manager, Government Affairs
                                         Johnson Controls, Inc.
                                         400 N. Capitol St., NW  Suite 585
                                         Washington  DC  20001
 William Amt
 CEO
 Octagon, Inc.
 317 S. North Lake Blvd.
 Altamonte Springs  FL
Suite 1024
32701
Julie Belaga
Director '
Export-Import Bank of the United States
811 Vermont Avenue, NW
Washington  DC  20571

-------
 Joan Berkowitz
 Managing Director
 Farkas Berkowitz & Company
 1220 19th Street, NW
 Washington  DC  20036
 Charles Botwick
 Principal
 Botwick & Associates
 Box 1710
 Middleburg VA  22117
 Peter Bibko
 Manager, Environmental and Government Affairs
 Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
 PO Box 3370
 Gramercy  LA  70052
 Peter Bowe
 President
 Ellicot Machine Corporation, International
 1611 Bush Street
 Baltimore MD  21230
 Anthony Biddle
 Vice President of Global Environmental Strategy
 Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
 One Chase Manhattan Bank, Third Floor
 New York  NY  10081
 Celeste Boykin
 Manager, Federal Affairs
 DuPont
 1701 Pennsylvania Ave., NW  Suite 900
 Washington  DC  20006
 Kevin Billings
 Director and General Manager GESCO
 Westinghouse Electric Corporation
 600 New Hampshire Ave., NW
 Washington  DC  20037
 William Brennan
 President
 Griffin Capital Corporation
 27 Longwood Drive
 Wayne PA  19087
Robert Blackwell
Senior Vice President
OHM Corp.
816 Connecticut Ave., NW Suite 900
Washington  DC  20006
Maj. Gen. Roy Bridges
Director, Joint Group on Aquisition Pollution Prevention
United States Air Force
4375 Chidlaw Road, Suite 6
Wright-Patterson AFB OH  45433-5006
Col. Franklin Blaisdell
Commander, 30th Space Wing
United States Air Force
747 Nebraska Ave., Ste A200-1
Vandenberg AFB CA  93437-6261
Dr. Wallace P. Brithinee
President
Brithinee Electric
620 S. Rancho Avenue
Colton  CA  92324
Thomas Bonnett
Director, Economic Development & Environment
Council of Governors Policy Advisors
400 N. Capitol Streetm NW Suite 390
Washington  DC  20001
Mary (Meg) Brown
Associate Director
Georgia Env. Technolgy Consortium
University of Georgia, 101 Driftmier Engineering Center
Athens  GA  30602

-------
Trudy Bryan
Senior Mananger of Federal Affairs
DuPont
1701  Pennsylvania Ave, NW Suite 900
Washington  DC   20006
Dennis Caputo
Vice President, Environmental Safety & Compliance
Proler International Corporation
4265 San Felipe  Suite 900
Houston  TX 77027
Hon. Carolyn Buchholz
Mayor
City of Lafayette
1660 Lincoln Street #1975
Denver  CO 80264
Eugene (Roy) Carawan
President and CEO
INFOOD Ltd.
5511 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh  NC  27606
Paul Bulson
Director of Asia Operations
Ecology and Environment, Inc.
999 Third Avenue Suite 1500
Seattle  WA  98104
John Carberry
Director, Environmental Technology
DuPont
Experimental Station, Bldg 249-119
Wilmington  DE  19880-0249
 Dale Byars
 Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc.
 1161 Corporate Drive West, Suite 140
 Arlington  TX  76006
Walter Carey
Director, Env. Operations & Regulatory Policy
Nestle USA, Inc.
60 Boardman Road
NewMilford  CT  06776
 William Byers
 Director of Environmental Technology
 CH2M HILL Federal Group, Inc.
 2300 NW Walnut Blvd.
 Corvallis  OR  97330
 Peter Carroll
 Vice President, Government Affairs
 Solar Turbines, Inc.
 818 Connecticut Ave., NW  Suite 600
 Washington  DC  20006-2702
 James (Jim) Cabot
 Director-CEIT
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 JFK Federal Building (RAA)
 Boston  MA  02203
 Edith Cecil
 Executive Director
 U.S. Environmental Training Institute
 1000 Thomas Jefferson St., NW
 Washington  DC  20007
 Connie Callan
 Director, National Environmental Technology Network
 University of New Mexico
 2201 Buena Vista, S.E.  Suite 204
 Albuquerque  NM  87106
 Robert Cochran
 Sr VP - Corp. & Business Development of Fed Programs
 ICF Kaiser
 9300 Lee Highway
 Fairfax VA  20031

-------
 Robert Colangelo
 President
 Environmental Planning Group, Inc.
 3105-D North Wilke Road
 Arlington Heights  IL  60004
 David Crikelair
 Vice President, Alternate Energy
 Texaco, Inc.
 2000 Westchester Ave.
 White Plains  NY  10650
 Megan Contee
 Senior Program Manager for Env. Programs
 National Association of State Development Agencies
 750 First Street, NE Suite 710
 Washington  DC  20002
 Charles Curtis
 Deputy Secretary
 U.S. Department of Energy
 1000 Independence Avenue SW
 Washington  DC  20585
 David James Cooper
 Consultant
 American Forest & Paper Association
 1111 19th Street
 Washington  DC  20005
 Daniel D'Aniello
 Managing Director
 The Carlyle Group
 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue  Suite 220 South
 Washington DC  20004
 John K. Coors
 President
 Golden Photon, Inc.
 4545 Mclntyre Street
 Golden  CO  80403
 Katherine Dantz
 Market Specialist - Energy & Environmental Markets
 Honeywell, Inc.
 1100 Connecticut Ave., NW Suite 710
 Washington  DC  20036
William Coyne
Senior Vice President for Research and Development
3M Company
Les  Darling
Director, Environmental Affairs
Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
9100E. Mineral Circle
Englewood  CO  80155
John Creighton
President and CEO
Weyerhauser
MS CHSH
Tacoma  WA  98477
Drew S. Debrey
President
Quad City Die Casting Company
3800 River Drive
Moline  IL 61265
Jacqueline Crenca
Vice President, Defense Programs
CH2M HILL Federal Group, Inc.
6060 South Willow Drive
Greenwood Village  CO 80111
Donald Deieso
President and CEO
Metcalf and Eddy, Inc.
P.O. Box 1500
Somerville  NJ  08876

-------
Michael Scott Delello
Director Washington Relations
Electric Power Research Institute
2000 L Street, NW Suite 805
Washington  DC   20036
Samuel  Doctors
Executive Director
Environmental Finance Center Region 9
25800 Carlos Bee Blvd. SBE RO109
Hayward CA  94542-3069
James Herbert Dempsey
Director, Technology Development
Acurex Environmental Corporation
POBox 13109
Research Triangle Park  NC  27709
Anthony Dolcimascolo
CFO
TAMS Consultants, Inc.
655 Third Avenue
New York  NY  10017
Livio DeSimone
Chairman of  the Board & CEO
3M Company
3M Center, Bldg 220-14W-05
St. Paul MN 55144-1000
Sandra Doliner
Chief Financial Officer
Environmental Enterprises Assistance Fund
1901 N. Moore Street, Suite 1004
Arlington  VA  22209
John DeVillars
Regional Administrator
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
JFK Federal Building
Boston  MA  02203
A.J. Donelson
Manager Federal Government Affairs
3M Company
1101  15th Street NW  Suite 1100
Washington   DC  20005
Betty J. Diener
President
Enviromental Business Council of New England
500 Victory Rd., Marina Bay
North Quincy  MA  02171
Cyril William Draffin, Jr.
Vice President, Strategic Planning
BDM International, Inc.
1501 BDM Way
McLean VA  22102
Wayne Diesel
President and CEO
Mechanical Technology, Inc.
968 Albany-Shaker Road
Latham NY  12110
Michael Driver
Partner
Patton Boggs, L.L.P.
1660 Lincoln Street, Suite 1975
Denver  CO   80264
Patricia DiRuggiero
Associate General Counsel
M4 Environmental Management
1615 L Street, NW Suite 540
Washington  DC  20015
Michael Duff
Executive Director
The Analytical Instrument Association
225  Reinekers Lane Suite 625
Alexandria  VA  22314-2875

-------
 Mark DuVal
 ST. Counsel
 3M Company
 Bldg. 220-1 IE-OS, 3M Center
 St. Paul MN  5146-1000
 Dennis Ferrigno
 President and CEO
 Bateman Engineering, Inc.
 3900 SS. Wadsworth Blvd. Suite 200
 Denver  CO  80235-2205
 Anthony Earley, Jr.
 President and COO
 Detroit Edison
 2000 Second Avenue
 Detroit Ml  48226
 James Ferris
 President
 CH2M HILL Federal Group, Inc.
 6060 Willow Drive
 Greenwood Village  CO  80111
 James  Edwards
 Chairman & CEO
 ICF Kaiser International, Inc.
 9300 Lee Highway
 Fairfax  VA  22031-1207
 Donna Fitzpatrick
 President and CEO
 Radiance Services Company
 4405 East-West Highway Suite 512
 Bethesda MD  20814
 Stuart Eizenstadt
 Under Secretary for InternationalTrade
 U.S. Department of Commerce
 14th & Pennsylvania Ave., NW
 Washington  DC  20230
 Timothy Flaherty
 Director
 Keystone Energy Program
 1001 G Street, NW, Suite 430 West
 Washington DC  20001
 Greg Evans
 VP - Environmental Services & Technology Division
 Coleman Research Corportation
 950 L'Enfant Plaza
 Washington   DC  20024
James Florio
Partner
Florio & Perrucci, P.C.
371 Hoes Lane
Piscataway  NJ  08854
Marc Falkin
International Sales Director
Taylor Environmental International
1457 Route 22 East
Annandale  NJ  08801
Harvey Forest
President and CEO
Solarex Corp.
630 Solarex Court
Frederick  MD   21701
Robert L. Ferguson
Chairman
Technical Resources International, Inc.
723 The Parkway
Richland  WA  99352
Charles L. Fox
Director Legislative Liason
Raytheon
1215 Jefferson Davis Highway
Arlington  VA  22202

-------
 Linda Greer
 Senior Scientist
 Natural Resources Defense Council
 1350 New York Ave., NW
 Washington  DC
 Don Hartsell
 President
 Solex Environmental Systems, Inc.
 1003 Wirt Road Suite 107
 Houston  TX  77055
Thomas Crumbly
Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management
U. S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave, SW
Washington  DC  20585
 Thomas Harvey
 Chairman and CEO
 Global Environment & Technology Foundation
 7010 Little River  Suite 300
 Annandale  VA  22003
William Haney
President and CEO
Molten Metal Technology Inc.
51 Sawyer Road, Fifth Floor
Waltham  MA  02154
 Karl Hausker
 Director, Enterprise for the Environment
 Center for Strategic and International Studies
 1800 K Street, Nw
 Washington DC  20006
Robert Hanfling
Senior Advisor
Patton Boggs, LLP
1776 I Street, NW  Suite 600
Washington  DC  20006
Andrew W. Hayes
Vice President, Corporate Product Integrity
The Gillette Company
Prudential Tower Building
Boston  MA  02199
Paul Hannesson
President and CEO
Commodore Environmental Services, Inc.
Alan Hecht
Office of International Activities
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street SW
Washington   DC  20460
Frederic Hansen
Deputy Administrator
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401  M Street, SW
Washington  DC  20460
Ben Henneke, Jr.
President and CEO
Clean Air Action Corporation
36 South Charles Street  Suite 1910
Baltimore  MD  21201
Peter Harrod
Executive Vice President & COO
Advance Sciences, Inc.
6739 Academy Road, NE
Albuquerque  NM   87109
Judson (Jud) Hill
Executive  Vice President
Thermatrix, Inc.
1 Church St. Suite 700
Rockville  MD   20850

-------
Paul Frey
Senior Vice President
Bank of America Illinois
231 S. LaSalle Street Suite 638
Chicago  IL  60697
Bradford Gentry
Senior Research Scholar
Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy
205 Prospect Street, "Sage Hall
New Haven  CT  06511
Paul Friday
Principal Technical Manager
Concurrent Technologies Corp.
1450 Scaid Avenue
Johnstown  PA  15904
Maurizio Giabbai, Phd.
President
Strategic Technologies & Resources, Ltd.
2211 New Market Pkwy, Suite 154
Marietta  GA  30067
Johan Friedericy
Director, Research & Technology
Allied Signal Aerospace
1001 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Suite 700 South
Washington DC  20004
John H. (Jack) Gibbons
Assistant to the President for Science and Technology
The White House
Old Executive Office Building
Washington DC  20502
Allen Frischkorn
President and CEO
Environmental Industry Association
4301 Connecticut Ave, NW Suite 300
Washington  DC  20008
Mary Lowe Good
Under Secretary for Technology
U.S. Department of Commerce
14th and Constitution, N.W. Room 4824
Washington DC  20230
Darryl  Fry
Chairman of the Board, President and CEO
Cytec Industries, Inc.
5 Garret Mountain Plaza
West Patterson  NJ  07424
Samuel Goodhope
Special Counsel for Environment and Transportation
Office  of the Attorney General State of Texas
P.O. Box 12548 Capitol Station
Austin  TX  78711
Jaques Gansler
Executive Vice President
TASC, Inc.
1101 Wilson Blvd.  Suite 1500
Arlington  VA  22209
Albert Gray
Deputy Executive Director
Water Environmental Federation
601 Wythe Street
Alexandria  VA  22314
David Gardiner
Ass't. Administrator for Policy, Planning and Evaluation
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW
Washington  DC  20460
David Mitchell Gray
Managing Director
Alex Brown & Sons, Inc.
135 E. Baltimore Street
Baltimore MD  21202

-------
John Kolojeski
Executive Vice President
Octagon, Inc.
39955 Oatlands Mill Road
Leesburg VA  22075
Robert Laudise
Adjunct Chemical Director
Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies
600 Mountain Avenue, Room 1A-264
Murray Hill  NJ  07974-0636
Martha Krebs
Director, Office of Energy Research
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave., SW
Washington  DC  20585-0118
Hon. Jan Laverty -Jones
Mayor
City of Las Vegas
400 East Stewart Avenue
Las Vegas  NV  89101
Kalliana Krishnan
President/CEO
Kal Krishnan Consulting Services, Inc.
334 19th Street
Oakland CA  94612
Michael Leake
Director, Environmental, Safety and Health
Texas Instrument Comm. and Defense Systems Group
P.O. Box 655303 M/S 8365
Dallas  TX  75265
Dawn Kristof
President
Water & Wastewater Equipment Manufacturing Association
P.O. Box17402
Washington  DC  20041
Robert Levy
Vice President, Government and Regulatory Affairs
Energy BioSystems Corporation
4200  Research Forest Drive
The Woodlands  TX  77381
Chuck Lacy
General Manager
Living Technologies, Inc.
431 Pine Street
Burlington  VT 05465
Andrew Lietz
President and CEO
Hadco Corporation
12A Manor Parkway
Salem  NH  03079
Paul Lambert
Vice-President, Coating Operations
Polaroid Corp.
1265 Main Street, Bldg. W4-2W
Waltham  MA  02154
Kathryn Lindquist
Vice President - Marketing
Taylor-DeJough Inc.
1350 Connecticut Avenue, NW  Suite 915
Washington  DC  20036
Jonathan Lash
President
World Resources Institute
1709 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington  DC  20006
Diana MacArthur
CEO
Dynamac Corporation
2275 Research Blvd  Suite 500
Rockville MD  20850

-------
Robert Hill
Chairman, Joint Pollution Prevention Advisory Board
HQ Air Force Materiel Command/ DRM
4375 Chidlaw Road, Suite 6
Wright-Patterson AFB  OH  45433-5006
 Kathryn Jackson
 Senior Vice President, Resource Group
 Tennessee Valley Authority
 400 West Summit Hill Drive
 Knoxville TN  37902
Thomas Houlihan
Senior Analyst
Institute of Regulatory Sciences
5457 Twin Knolls Road
Columbia  MD  21045
Jim  Janis
Executive Vice President
BNFL, Inc.
1776 I Street, NW  Suite 750
Washington  DC  20006-3700
Robert P. Howard
Corporate Director, Government Relations
Reynolds Metals Company
6603 W. Broad Street
Richmond VA  23230
Dawn  Kaback
Executive Director
Colorado Center for Environmental Management
999 18th St., #2750
Denver CO  80202
Walter Howes
President
EBI Capital Group, LLP
1314Timberly Lane
McLean  VA  22102
Dale Lee Keairns
Manager of Chemical & Environmental Operations
Westinghouse Science & Technology Center
1310 Beulah Road
Pittsburgh  PA  15235
Jeffrey Hunker
Senior Advisor to the Secretary
U.S. Department of Commerce
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington  DC 20230
James Kirk
Chairman, President & CEO
OHM Remediation Services Corporation
16406 U.S. Route 224 East
Findlay  OH  45839-0551
Ronald Hunter
Vice President-Administrative Services
Fannie Mae
3900 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
Washington  DC 20016
William Kirksey
Paul Inderbit^en
Chairman, President and CEO
American Re-Insurance Company
555 College Road East
Princeton  NJ  08543
Allen Michael Koleff
VP - Environment, Energy and Process Technology
Stone Container Corporation
1979 Lakeside Parkway, Suite 300
Tucker GA  30084

-------
James Mahoney
Senior Vice President
International Technology Corporation
23456 Hawthorne Boulevard Suite 300
Torrance  CA  90505
Thomas McNabb
President
Aquatics Unlimited, Inc.
2150 Franklin Canyon Road
Martinez CA  94553
Dennis Mangino
President & CEO
NSF International
3475 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor  Ml  48105
Martin Mearhoff
Manager, Environmental Services Division
American Electric Power
One Riverside Plaza
Columbus OH  43215
Vik Man!
Vice-President, Federal Group Services
CH2M HILL Federal Group, Inc.
6060 South Willow Drive
Greenwood Village  CO  80111-5142
William Miller, 111
Manager Environmental Affairs
Saturn Corporation
100 Saturn Parkway PO Box 1500
Spring Hill  TN  37174
David Marsh
Chairman
Marsh Plating Company
103 N. Grove Street
Ypsilanti  Ml  48198
Kenneth Millian
Executive Director
Global Environmental Management Initiative
2000 L St., NW Suite 710
Washington  DC  20005
Bret Maxwell
Managing Director
First Analysis Corporation
233 S. Wacker DriveSuite 9500
Chicago  IL  60606
John Mizroch
Executive Director
U.S. Environmental Technology Export Council
1835 K Street, NW Suite 805
Washington DC  20006
 R. Steven Maxwell
 Managing Director
 Techknowledgey Strategic Group
 104 Pine Tree Lane
 Boulder  CO  80304
Andrew Murphy
Vice President
Acurex Environmental Corporation
P.O. Box 13109
Research Triangle Park  NC  27709
 Alan McKim
 President and CEO
 Clean Harbors Inc.
 325 Wood Road
 Braintree  MA  02184
 John iCharles Mycock
 Executive Vice President
 ETS lnternational,lnc.
 1401 Municipal
 Roanoke  VA  24102

-------
 Albert Narath
 President, Energy and Environment Sector
 Lockheed Martin Corporation
 1155 University Blvd.
 Albuquerque  NM  87106-4320
 Deana Perlmutter
 Policy Analyst
 Patton Boggs, L.L.P.
 1660 Lincoln St. Suite 1975
 Denver CO  80264
 Tim Newell
 Deputy Director for Policy
 White House Office of Science and Technology Policy
 Old Executive Office Building  Room 428
 Washington  DC   20500
 Ralph Peterson
 Chief Executive Officer
 CH2M HILL Companies, Ltd.
 6060 S. Willow Drive P.O. Box 22508
 Denver  CO  80222
 Frank Nutter
 President
 Reinsurance Association of America
 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 900
 Washington  DC  20004
 Richard Pinckert
 Director, Environmental Assurance Division
 McDonnell Douglas Aerospace Corporation
 P.O. Box 516
 St. Louis  MO  63166
 John Oleson
 Director, Manufacturing Technology
 Dow Corning Corporation
 P.O. Box 994
 Midland  Ml  48686-0994
 Hon. Robert Pirie
 Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Inst. and Env.)
 United States Navy
 1000 Navy Pentagon
 Washington DC  20350-1000
 E. Timothy Oppelt
 Director, National Risk Management Research Laboratory
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr. (MS 235)
 Cincinnati OH  45268
John Pirotte
President & CEO
Corpex Technologies, Inc.
P.O. Box 13486
Research Triangle Park  NC
                                                                                         27709-3486
James Albert Palmer, Jr.
President, Newport News Nuclear
Newport News Shipbuilding
4101 Washington Ave.
Newport News  VA  23607
Frank Pope
General Partner
Technology Funding, Inc.
2000 Alameda de las Pulgas
SanMateo CA   94403
Allen Paul
President
UNISPHERE Institute
1625 Massachusetts Ave., NW  Suite 215
Washington  DC  20036
Jan Power
President
Power Associates Group
305 Whispering Oaks Lane
Davidsonville  MD  21035

-------
John Preston
President and CEO
Quantum Energy Technology
238 Main Street  Suite 324
Cambridge  MA  02142
Jim Ricci
President
Twin Rivers Technologies
780 Washington Street
Quincy  MA  02169
Robert Prince
President & CEO
GTS-Duratech
8955 Guilford Road Suite 200
Columbia  MD  21046
Vernon Rice
Associate General Counsel
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company
1007 Market Street, Legal, D-8042
Wilmington  DE  19898
Fernando Quezada
Executive Director
Biotechnology Center of Excellence Corporation
Nine Park Street
Boston  MA  02108-4807
James Richter
Vice President, Strategic Development
National Center for Manufacturing Sciences
3025 Boardwalk
Ann Arbor  Ml  48108-3266
Bryan Redd
President
Global Technologies Connection, Ltd
12616 Amber Terrace
Richmond  VA   23233
John Riggs
Director, Program on Energy and the Environment
Aspen Institute
1333 New Hampshire Ave., NW  Suite 1070
Washington  DC  20036
Thomas J. Redder
Region VIII Administrator of the SBA
SBA
721 19th Street, Suite 400
Denver CO  80202-2599
Robert E. Roberts
Executive Director
The Environmental Council of States
444 N. Capitol Street Suite 517
Washington DC  20001
 David Rejeski
 Senior Policy Analyst
 White House Office of Science and Technology Policy
 Old Executive Office Building, Room 443
 Washington DC  20500
Robert (Gregg) Roberts
Senior VP & Director, Environmental Risk Services
AON Risk Services
510 Bering Drive  Suite 500
Houston  TX  77057
 Susan Resetar
 Analyst
 RAND/CTI
 2100 M Street, NW
 Washington  DC  20037
William J. Roberts
Legislative Director
Environmental Defense Fund
1875 Connecticut Ave.
Washington  DC  20009

-------
 Ira Rubenstein
 Executive Director
 Environmental Business Association of New York State
 1223 Peoples Avenue
 Troy NY  12180
 Howard Schirmer
 President
 CH2M HILL International, Ltd.
 6060 South Willow Drive
 Greenwood Village CO  80222
 Kenneth Rubin
 President
 Apogee International, Inc.
 4350 East West Highway  6th Floor
 Bethesda MD   20814
 Brig. Gen.  Sheehan
 Deputy for Resource Management
 United States Air Force
 SAF/MI, 1660 Air Force Pentagon
 Washington  DC  20330-1660
 Dean Rulis
 President
 Golden Technologies
 4545 Mclntyre
 Golden  CO  80403
 Robert Shinn
 Commissioner
 New Jersey DEP
 Trenton, NJ
 Trenton  NJ  08625
 Brian  Runkel
 Executive Director
 California Environmental Business Council
 183 Bering Drive Suite 22
 San Jose CA  95112
 Rand Shulman
 Vice President - H.S. & E.
 Shell  Oil Products Co./Shell Chemical Co.
 P.O. Box 2463
 Houston  TX  77252
Lawrence Lee Sams
Director, Federal Technical/Business Development
Dow Chemical Company
1776 Eye Street, NW Suite 575
Washington  DC  20006
 Dr. Marc Siegel
 Director
 Engineering Process & Information Consulting
 12397 Picrus Street
 San Diego  CA  92129-4113
Robert Savoie
President, CEO
Integrated Resources Group
111 Veterans Blvd., Suite 900
Metalrie  LA  70005
Charles Simmons
Vice President
American Electric Power
P.O. Box 2021
Roanoke  VA  24022
Mark Schaefer
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Water and Science
U.S. Department of Interior
1849 C Street, NW
Washington  DC   20240
Scott Sklar
Executive Vice President
U.S. Export Council for Renewable Energy
777 North Capitol Street, N.W. #805
Washington  DC  20002

-------
Glen Skovholt
Vice President, Government & Community Affairs
Honeywell, Inc.
Honeywell Plaza
Minneapolis  MN  55408
Maurice Strong
Senior Advisor to the President, World Bank
Technology Development Inc.
1818 H Street NW
Washington  DC 20433
Christopher Smith
Senior Vice President
Chemonics International, Inc.
1133 20th St., NW Suite 600
Washington  DC   20036
Scott Styles
Washington Representative
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
805  15th Street, NW Suite 410
Washington  DC  20005
Peter Snyder
State Government Relations
Air Products & Chemicals
7201 Hamilton Blvd.
Allentown  PA  18195
Scott Summers
Director, Kodak Environmental Services
Eastman Kodak Company
1100 Ridgeway Ave
Rochester NY  14652-6652
William Snyder
Program Manager
Border Environmental Business Cluster
477 Marina Parkway
Chula Vista  CA  91910
Byron Swift
Director, Technology Center
Environmental Law Institute
1616 P Street, NW Suite 200
Washington DC  20036
Nicole Sparks
Corporate Affairs Specialist
CH2M HILL
6060 S. Willow Drive
Englewood,  CO  80111
Dale Tahtinen
Vice President for Government Relations
Michigan Technological University
1400 Townsend Drive
Houghton Ml   49931-1295
 Frank Stewart
 Manager Golden Field Office
 U.S. Department of Energy
 1617 Cole Blvd. Bldg 17
 Golden  CO  80401
John Tao
Corporate Director, Technology Partnerships
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
7201 Hamilton Blvd.
Allentown  PA 18195-1501
 Paul Douglas Stone
 Director, Federal Technolgy & Business Development
 Dow Chemical Company
 1776 Eye Street, NW  Suite 575
 Washington DC  20006
 C. Bruce Tarter
 Director
 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
 P.O. Box 808, L-001
 Livermore  CA 94550

-------
 Tyrone Taylor
 Washington DC Representative
 Federal Laboratory Consortium
 1850 M Street Suite 800
 Washington  DC  22036
 Kent Troup
 Vice President
 TEMCOR International, Ltd.
 79 West 12th Street Suite 150
 New York  NY  10011
 Gerard Tempest, Jr.
 Chairman and CEO
 Tempest Environmental Systems, Inc.
 101 W. Markham Avenue
 Durham  NC  27701-1314
 Richard Tucker
 Senior Vice President
 Dames & Morore
 7101 Wisconsin Ave
 Bethesda  MD  20852
 Bryan Thomlison
 Executive Director
 Environmental Technology CHALLENGE
 1350 New York Ave., NW 11 th Floor
 Washington   DC  20005
 Steven Turner
 President and CEO
 L.G.S. Turner and Associates, Ltd.
 Robert Tiller
 President
 ICF Kaiser Hanford Co.
 P.O. Box 888/MSIN E6-61
 Richland WA  99352
 George Vander Velde
 Principal
 Environmental Planning Group, Inc
 3105-D North Wilke Road
 Arlington Heights  IL 60004
Paul Toback
Senior Vice President
Globetrotters Engineering Corporation
300 South  Wacker Drive  Suite 200
Chicago  IL  60606
 Ray Vickery
 Assistant Secretary for Trade Development
 U.S. Department of Commerce
 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW
 Washington DC  20230
Peter Tramm
Manager, Technology & Research
Allison Engine Company
P.O. Box 420-MC T21
Indianapolis  IN  46206
James Watts
President
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers
P.O. Box 524
Richland  WA  99352
Alvin Trivelpiece
Director
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
P.O. Box 2008
Oak Ridge TN  37831-6255
Walter Weber
Environmental Studies
University of Michigan, Civil & Environmental Engineering
1351  Beal Avenue Suite 181 EWRE Bldg
Ann Arbor  Ml  48109-2125

-------
Richard Westfahl
President
Raytrjeen Environmental Services, Inc.
1250 W. Sam Houston Pkwy. S.
Houston  TX  77042
Thomas Zosel
Manager, Environmental Initiatives
3M Company
P.O. Box 3331
St. Paul MN  55133
Emmet James Whitehead
Vice-President/Director of Business Development
Raytheon
1 Broadway
Cambridge  MA  02142
Robert Dale Wilson
Partner
Wilson & Wilson
1155 15th Street, NW Suite 815
Washington  DC  20005
Kenneth Winger
President
Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 210799, 220 Outlet Pointe Blvd.
Columbia  SC  29210
James Wolf
Vice President
The Trane Company
2020 14th Street, North
Arlington VA  22201
 Sandra Woods
 Vice President & Chief Environmental Officer
 Coors Brewing Company
 Dept. BC320
 Golden  CO  80401
 Glenn Youngkin
 Vice President
 The Carlyle Group
 1001 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
 Washington DC  20004

-------
 John Atcheson
 Department of Energy
 Office of Energy Efficiency
 1000 Independence Ave., SW
 Washington  DC  20585
 Brendan  Doyle
 Senior Policy Advisor
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 401 M St., SW
 Washington  DC  20460
 Jay Benforado
 Director, Regulatory Reinvention Team
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 401 M Street, SW
 Washington  DC
 Jerome Edwards
 Principal Scientist
 Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.
 5665 Flatiron Parkway
 Boulder  CO  80301
 Robert Boyd
 Office of the Director - Defense Research & Engineering
 U.S. Department of Defense
 3080 Defense Pentagon
 Washington  DC 20301-3080
 Peter Fox-Penner
 Office of the Deputy Secretary
 Department of Energy
 1000 Independence Avenue SW
 Washington DC  20585
 Leslie Cordes
 Office of Energy, Environment & Technology
 U.S. Agency for International Development
 G/ENWEET, SA-18, Room 508
 Washington DC  20523
 Maryann Froehlich
 Director, Office of Policy Development
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 401 M Street, SW  Room 1005 WT
 Washington  DC  20460
Jeffrey Crater
Office of Environmental Management
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave., SW
Washington  DC  20585
 Mark Gilbertson
 Office of Science and Technology
 U.S. DOE - Off ice of Environmental Management
 1000 Independence Ave., SW
 Washington  DC  20585
Ann Davlin
U.S. Department of Defense
Washington  DC  20301-3080
Stuart Goldstein
Office of Energy Research
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue SW
Washington  DC  20585
Kevin Doxey
Office of Environmental Security
U.S. Department of Defense
Washington  DC   20301-3080
Richard Guimond
Principal Dep. Ass't. Secretary Enviro Management
U. S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave, SW
Washington  DC  20585

-------
David Hales
U.S.  Agency for International Development
Washington  DC  20523
Walter Kovalick
Director, Technology Innovation Office
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW (5102W)
Washington  DC  20460
Guy  Hammer
Director, Office of Technology Applications
Ballistic Missile Defense Organization
The Pentagon
Washington  DC   20301
John Lehr
Office of Environmental Restoration
U.S. DOE - Office of Environmental Management
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington  DC  20585
Carol Henry
Office of Science and Technology
U.S. DOE - Office of Environmental Management
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington  DC  20585
Amy Manheim
Director, ClimateWise
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue SW
Washington DC  20585
 Sarita Hoyt
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 402 M Street, SW
 Washington  DC  20460
Albert McGartland
Director, Office of Economy and Environment
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M St., SW
Washington DC  20460
 Jon Kessler
 Director, Emeriging Sectors & Strategies Division
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 401 M Street, SW
 Washington   DC  20460
 Carlos Montoulieu
 Environmental Technologies Exports
 U.S. Department of Commerce
 14th & Pennsylvania Ave., NW  Room 4324
 Washington  DC  20230
 Jamison Koehler
 Director, Office of Technology Cooperation & Assistance
 U.S. EPA
 401 M Street, SW
 Washington, D.C.  20460
 William Nitze
 Office of International Activities
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 401 M Street SW
 Washington DC  20460
 Carla Koppell
 Office of Energy, Environment & Technology
 U.S.  Agency for International Development
 G/ENV/EET, SA-18, Room 508
 Washington  DC  20523
 Craig O'Conner
 Export-Import Bank of the United States
 811 Vermont Avenue, NW
 Washington  DC  20571

-------
 Lewis Reade
 Director General
 US-Asia Environmental Partnership
 U.S. Department of State 321  21st Street, NW, Ste 3208
 Washington  DC  20523
 Sharon Stahl
 Special Assistant to the Administrator
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 401 M St., SW
 Washington DC  20460
 Andrew Reynolds
 Oceans, Enviornment and Science
 U.S. Department of State
 Washington  DC  20523
 Denise Swink
 Dept. of Energy
 Washington  DC
20585
 Kim Sais
 Office of Energy, Environment & Technology
 U.S. Agency for International Development
 G/ENWEET,SA-18, Room 508
 Washington DC  20523
 Sean Todd
 Office of Environmental Management
 U.S. Department of Energy
 1000 Independence Ave SW
 Washington  DC  20585
 Connie Sasala
 Director, Policy and Tech Innovation Div.
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 401 M St., SW
 Washington DC  20460
Eleanor Tyler
Office of Energy, Environment & Technology
U.S. Agency for International Development
G/ENV/EET.SA-18, Room 508
Washington  DC  20523
Jeff Seabright
Director, Office of Energy, Environment & Technology
U.S. Agency for International Development
G/ENV/EET,SA-18, Room 508
Washington  DC 20523
William White
Special Assistant
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M St., SW
Washington  DC  20460
Jane Siegel
Environmental Technologies Exports
U.S. Department of Commerce
14th & Pennsylvania Ave., NW Room 4324
Washington  DC  20230
Marianne Smith
Senior Advisor
U.S. Department of Commerce
14th and Pennsylvania  Room 6008
Washington  DC  20230

-------