vvEPA

 United States
 Environmental Protection
 Agency


 Environmental Justice


 2000 Biennial Report:


 Continuing to Move Towards

 Collaborative and

 Constructive Problem-Solving
                   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

-------
United States                     Enforcement and                 EPA/300-R-01-005
Environmental Protection          Compliance Assurance            October 2001
Agency                          (22 01 A)             	http://www.epa.gov/compliance

Office of Environmental Justice
                               To Obtain Copies

Copies of this 1999-2000 biennial report may be obtained by writing or calling:

                   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                   National Service Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP)
                   P.O. Box 42419
                   Cincinnati, OH 45242
                   Telephone:    513-489-8190

                   and requesting Report No. EPA/300-R-01-005.

You may also review it, along with the previously published reports, on the web site:
http://www.epa.gov/compliance/environmentaliustice
                                    Annual Reports
             Environmental Justice Initiatives - 1993 (EPA 200-R-93-001)
             Environmental Justice 1994 Annual Report - Focusing on Environmental
                   Protection for All People (EPA/200-R-95-003)
             Environmental Justice: 1996 Biennial Report - Working Towards Solutions
                   (EPA/300-R-97-004)
             Environmental Justice: 1998 Biennial Report: Moving Towards Collaborative and
                   Constructive Problem-Solving (EPA 300/R-00-004)
             Environmental Justice: 2000 Biennial Report: Continuing To Move Towards
                   Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving (EPA 300/R-01-005)
                                      Inside Front Cover

-------
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
2000 BIENNIAL REPORT:

» Continuing To Move Towards
Collaborative and
Constructive Problem-Solving
              Prepared by
         Office of Environmental Justice
    Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

-------
	Contents

PREFACE           	v

INTRODUCTION    	  vii

CHAPTER 1:       Environmental Justice at the Federal Level	1

   White House Council on Environmental Quality  	  1.2
   Interagency Working Group on Environmental Justice	  1.3
       Integrated Federal Interagency EJ Action Agenda  	  1.4
       Demonstration Projects   	  1.4
       Highlights of Projects  	   1.5
       Completed Projects  	  1.6
   Other Interagency Cooperation Effects  	  1.7
   National Environmental Policy Act Implementation	 1.10

CHAPTER 2:       Addressing Environmental Justice Problems	2

   Lead Problems and Solutions   	2.1
   Permit Problems and Solutions 	2.5
   Pesticide Problems and Solutions 	2.6
   Persistent Bio-Accumulative Toxins Problems and Solutions  	2.9
   Fish Contamination Problems and Solutions	2.9
   Drinking Water Problems and Solutions  	2.12
   Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations Problems and Solutions 	2.12
   Communities with Multiple Problems  	  2.13
   Children's Health Problems and Solutions 	2.16
   State Efforts to Address Problems and Find Solutions  	2.20
   Tribal Efforts to Address Problems and Find Solutions  	2.24
   Federal Facilities Problems and Solutions  	2.24
   Using Supplemental Environmental Projects  	2.25
   Alternative Dispute Resolution	2.25
   Solid and Hazardous Waste Sites/Brownfields Cleanup Problems and Solutions 	  2.26
   International Problems and Solutions  	2.33
   Mexican Border Problems and  Solutions 	2.34

CHAPTER 3:       Public Participation and Training Initiatives	3

   Public Participation Initiatives  	3.1
   Environmental Justice Training Activities  	3.2
   Interagency Environmental Justice Training	3.3
   State Training  	3.4
   Tribal Training  	3.5

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          -iii-

-------
                                                                       Contents
CHAPTER 4:       Outreach Initiatives  	4

   Outreach  	4.1
   Tribal Consultation 	4.5
   International Outreach	4.6

CHAPTER 5:       Assessment Methodologies, Assessment Guidance, and Community
                   Assessments	5

   Assessment Methodologies	5.1
   Community/Site Specific Assessments	5.3

CHAPTER 6:       Targeting, Environmental Health, and Exposure Studies	6

   Targeting Studies  	6.1
   Environmental Health Studies  	6.3
   Exposure Studies	6.7

APPENDIX:  EPA EnvironmentalJustice Coordinators  	Al
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                        -iv-

-------
                                                                              Preface
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is firmly committed to integrating environmental
justice into  all of our programs, policies, and activities.  This report highlights the Agency's
determination to pursue environmental justice in a manner consistent with existing environmental
laws and their implementing regulations. We will do so in coordination with our partners at all levels
of government and throughout the public and private sectors to be  sure that protection from
environmental hazards is universal.

    Environmental justice is achieved when every American, regardless of race, culture, education
or income enjoys not only the same degree of protection from environmental threats, but also equal
access to the decision making process that ensures a healthy environment in which to live, learn,
play, and work.  To achieve this goal, we will include all stakeholders in an open, creative,  and
cooperative effort to effectively address the environmental, health, economic, and social challenges
facing our communities.

    To assist you in obtaining additional information on any of the issues contained in this report,
a list of the Environmental Justice Coordinators for EPA headquarters and each regional office is
included as an appendix.  I encourage you to take advantage of this resource.

    Through the Agency's ongoing work, we will  ensure that environmental protection reaches all
of our communities. By doing so, we can pass along cleaner air, purer water, and healthier land to
future generations in every corner of America.
                                             , Director
                                            nvironmental Justice
Environmental Justice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving

-------
                                                                            Introduction
    The mission  of the  U.S.  Environmental Protection  Agency  (EPA)  is to safeguard the natural
environment-the air, land, and water-upon which all life depends, to protect human health, and ensure a sound
environment for all Americans.  Through the leadership of the Office of Environmental Justice (OEJ), EPA
is working to ensure all communities are afforded equal environmental and public health protection. This is
being accomplished through efforts to enhance community  access to information and environmental
education, so the pub lie may better understand their environment and the opportunities they have to participate
in the protection of their health and quality of life.  The public can take responsibility for its community by
participating in decision-making processes that directly affect their environment and public health. The EPA
defines the term "environmental justice" as follows:

    Environmental justice is the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless
    of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and
    enforcement of environmental  laws, regulations, and policies. Fair treatment means that no
    group of people, including  a  racial,  ethnic,  or socioeconomic  group,  should bear  a
    disproportionate share of the negative environmental consequences resulting from industrial,
    municipal, and commercial operations or the execution of federal, state and local, and tribal
    programs andpolicies. Meaningful involvement means that: (1) potentially affected community
    residents have an appropriate opportunity to participate in decisions about a proposed activity
 EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
 Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          vn

-------
                                                                             Introduction
    that will affect their environment and/or health; (2) the public's contribution can influence the
    regulatory agency's decision; (3) the concerns of all participants involved will be considered in
    the decisionmaking process; and (4) the decisionmakers seek out and facilitate the involvement
    of those potentially affected.

    As described in the definition, environmental justice is the goal to be achieved for all communities, so
that: (1) people of all races, colors, cultures, income, and educational levels are treated fairly with respect to
the development and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies, and (2) residents can be
meaningfully involved in the decisions that will affect their environment and health. Environmental justice
is about real people  facing real problems, and  designing practical solutions  to  address challenging
environmental, public health, and quality-of-life issues.

    Environmental justice emerged as a significant national issue in the mid 1980s. Since then, proponents
of environmental justice have advocated programs that promote environmental protection in the context of
sustainable development. From the time that EPA produced the report, "Reducing Risk in All Communities"
in 1991, the scope of environmental justice has been one of identifying legal and technical tools, targeting
resources, engaging all stakeholders in the environmental justice dialogue, and going beyond merely analyzing
problems. The primary objective of environmental justice is to find solutions.  Over the past decade, many
communities have found that building partnerships is a key way of achieving environmental justice for all
communities. Many of these partnerships result in solutions where everybody wins.

    As a result, OEJ has adopted the theme, "Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive
Problem-Solving" for the  2000 Biennial Report.   Over the past two years, this  concept  has matured
significantly. There is now a seasoned staff within the environmental justice program at EPA, not only in OEJ
and other national program offices, but most importantly within the regions.  It is in the regions that the
Agency comes into direct contact with the communities and other stakeholders confronting environmental
justice issues. Three items stand out as important elements of this evolution:

    1. OEJ has developed with others, and is aggressively implementing, a model for collaborative problem-
    solving that is holistic, proactive and comprehensive, includes all federal agencies, and builds partnerships
    with all stakeholders, including communities, state, local and tribal governments, faith and philanthropic
    organizations, the academic world, and business and industry.  This model is captured in the Integrated
    Federal Interagency Environmental Justice Action Agenda.  The goals of the Action Agenda are: (1) To
    promote greater coordination and cooperation among federal departments  and agencies;  (2) To make
    government more accessible and responsive to  communities;  (3) To initiate environmental justice
    demonstration projects to develop models for addressing community livability issues; and (4) To ensure
    integration of environmental justice in policies, programs and activities of federal government agencies.

    Such a model is based upon several premises: (1) It promotes federal government support of solutions that
    "begin in the community and remain in the community;"  (2) It  envisions a holistic approach that
    addresses environmental, public health, economic, and social/cultural concerns in an integrated manner;
    (3) It links federal, state andlocal, and tribal governments with comprehensive community-based planning
    processes; (4) It seeks better targeting and leveraging of public and private resources; (5) It seeks to
    develop a template for holistic community-based solutions to environmental justice issues; and (6) It
    serves as a platform for advocacy of a new way for government to do business.


 EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
 Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                              viii

-------
                                                                             Introduction
    2.  Another hallmark is the thoughtful use of facilitators to help with consensus-building and use
    alternative dispute resolution.  EPA recognizes that collaborative and constructive problem-solving
    requires partnerships,  often between groups who have traditionally seen themselves as  adversaries.
    Moreover, environmental injustice allegations create challenges  for collaborative and constructive
    problem-solving due to severe power imbalances, questions about who spe aks for an affected community,
    and cross-cultural differences. OEJ has established a program, through the Agency's Alternative Dispute
    Resolution  Office,  to  help  facilitate consultative decision-making processes that result in just and
    equitable resolutions of environmental justice controversies.

    3.  A third important hallmark of a maturing approach toward collaborative and constructive problem-
    solving is a new method to environmental justice training.  During the past year, the Agency has
    established an Environmental Justice Training Collaborative. This effort evolved in response to the EPA
    regional and headquarters environmental justice programs' recognition of the need for training of EPA
    staff, other federal agencies, states, tribes, business, industry and others. The Collaborative is built on
    partnerships among those with the most direct knowledge of environmental justice issues (i.e. affected
    communities.)  The Collaborative has begun to develop a basic environmental justice curriculum that is
    being field tested.

    As we  look to the future, EPA is seeking to build more partnerships with all  stakeholders in the
environmental justice dialogue deliberation. This will require a great deal of patience and it means learning
about each other as well as issues. It demands that we listen carefully and have the will to work through our
differences.  It demands that we learn not only about the facts at hand, but also inquire about what is valued,
honored and needs to be protected or sustained. It demands that we continually educate each other. These
challenges are extraordinary, but we are determined to confront and overcome them.
 EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
 Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                               ix

-------
                                                Chapter 1
                          Environmental Justice at the Federal Level
                         WORKING
                         TOGETHER
                          TOWARD
                     COLLABORATIVE
                            AND
                        INNOVATIVE
                         SOLUTIONS
Environmental Justice 2000 Biennial Report:

Continuing To Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem Solving             1.1

-------
                                    	Chapter 1
                                     Environmental Justice at the Federal Level
       Over these past two years, EPA has made a concerted effort to enhance its coordination with
other federal agencies to address issues of environmental justice.  Through the Federal Interagency
Working Group on Environmental Justice (IWG), EPA has seen the achievements possible when
federal agencies commit themselves to form partnerships to address issues  of environmental
injustice.   These federal partnerships have  proven essential to address  the  wide range of
environmental, public health, and economic concerns which tend to cut across agency missions and
responsibilities.  This chapter describes specific environmental justice projects, programs, and
activities of EPA undertaken in collaboration with other governmental agencies or community
organizations.   This chapter  demonstrates the need  for Federal,  state  and local, and tribal
governments to work together in order to effectively address the multi-faceted environmental, public
health, and economic concerns facing minority, low-income and tribal communities.

               White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEO)

Environmental Justice Dialogue in Los Angeles. In tackling matters of environmental justice,
EPA Region 9 has worked jointly with a variety of agencies and organizations. One of the most
effective collaborative efforts was the White  House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)
Environmental Justice Dialogue in Los Angeles. The dialogue took place on July 10 and 11, 1998,
and was coordinated by CEQ and Region 9 with the following federal agencies: Department of
Agriculture (USDA), Department of Commerce (DOC),  Department of the Interior (DOI),
Department of Justice (DOJ), Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Department
of Transportation (DOT), and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). The
dialogue resulted in a series of commitments made by  CEQ and the  Federal agencies  to the
community. A  number of  these commitments have  led to  significant accomplishments for
environmental justice.
       One of the concerns raised at the meeting was a potential problem with cancer deaths in the
Bell Gardens Area, a predominantly Latino community in Southeast Los Angeles. Investigations
and soil removal action showed low concentration of hexavalent chromium in the school yard, due
to a near-by chrome plating facility. California's Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)
issued an order to require the facility, Chrome  Chrankshaft, to reduce the potential dust migration
from the facility. In January of 1999, the facility permanently closed. EPA worked with the State
to develop an investigation of the work plan and community outreach plan. EPA is also facilitating
the process of bringing the  state and local agencies together to address health concerns such as
cancer, fertility problems, asthma, and birth defects.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          1.2

-------
                                    	Chapter 1
                                    Environmental Justice at the Federal Level
       Another commitment made to the community involved the potential sale of contaminated fish
in Asian communities. The possible risks associated with the consumption of contaminated fish have
been recognized in Los Angeles for about 15 years. A number of actions have been taken to advise
fishermen and consumers of the risks and prevent the sale of contaminated fish in retail markets.
EPA has dedicated funds to have the California Department of Health Services (CDHS) develop a
public outreach and education plan.
       In March 1999, EPA (as co-chair of the CEQ  Interagency Task Force on environmental
justice for Los Angeles) convened a meeting that focused on transportation and enforcement issues
identified by the community as priority issues.  The meeting was well attended with approximately
65 people representing community organizations, and local, state and federal agencies. A majority
of the 15 federal commitments have been accomplished.

New York City Interagency Environmental Justice Task Force. Federal agencies, including the
Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of Justice, the Army Corps of
Engineers, and EPA made several commitments to address environmental justice  concerns at the
March 6, 1999 White House Council on Environmental Quality forum in New  York City.  In
response to concerns raised by environmental organizations, an Interagency Task Force was formed
to implement commitments dealing with air quality, waste transfer stations, public health and open
space. Foremost among the concerns of the environmental organizations was the need for funding
sources.  Therefore, the Community Grants Workgroup, coordinated with the Interagency Task
Force, sponsored an environmental grants workshop held on December 8,1999. The purpose of the
grants fair was to identify grants, loans and other support available to environmental organizations
in the New York City metropolitan area. Workshop participants received information on how to
apply for a variety of federal and private grants. In addition, participants attended workshops that
provided information and tools to assist in writing successful proposals.
               Interagency Working Group on Environmental Justice

Executive Order 12898 established a Federal Interagency Working Group on Environmental Justice
(IWG) chaired by EPA and comprised of eleven departments and agencies and several White House
offices.  These include EPA, Departments of Defense, Energy, Labor, Interior, Transportation,
Agriculture, Housing and Urban Development, Commerce, and Health and Human Services, the
Council on Environmental Quality, Office of Management and Budget,  Office of Science and
Technology Policy, Domestic Policy Council, and Council of Economic Advisors.  EPA's Office
of Environmental Justice (OEJ) serves as the lead on the Interagency Working Group to incorporate
environmental justice into all federal agencies.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          1.3

-------
                                    	Chapter 1
                                     Environmental Justice at the Federal Level
Integrated Action Agenda

       In FY 2000, the IWG developed the "Integrated Federal Interagency Environmental Justice
Action Agenda" (Action Agenda) that is rooted in building proactive and dynamic partnerships
committed to integrated collaborative and constructive problem-solving at the local level.  The
Action Agenda results in better utilization of existing federal resources through better targeting and
leveraging of such resources in partnership with local groups and all stakeholders.  The Action
Agenda is a new effort, begun in 2000, and is built around fifteen demonstration projects in diverse
urban and rural communities in virtually all regions of the nation, including Puerto Rico and Alaska.
Thus far, these demonstration projects have leveraged between $12 to $15 million in public/private
resources. The goal of these projects range from environmental cleanup, brownfields and economic
development, public health and children's health, to community education and capacity building.
To help the public better access the federal government, the IWG produced a directory of federal
environmental justice contacts, (see below) All stakeholders, including community groups, faith
based organizations, states and local government, and industry have voiced support for the IWG's
"win-win" approach. The premises of the Agenda are the following:
1.      Promotes  federal support of solutions that  "begin in the community and remain in the
       community,"
2.      Links federal, state and local, and tribal government with community based comprehensive
       planning processes,
3.      Seeks collaboration and integration so that resources  can be better targeted and leveraged,
4.      Develops a template for holistic community based solutions to environmental justice issues,
       and
5.      Serves as a platform for advocating a new way of doing business.

Demonstration Projects

The interagency environmental justice demonstration projects are a great example of how the federal
agencies   and  other  stakeholders,  including communities,  businesses,  and  state and  local
governments, and tribal governments can work together to  develop and implement meaningful,
effective and desirable solutions.  The federal government is establishing a new baseline from which
to build future progress and policies to address environmental injustices. The demonstration projects
are:

1. Greater Boston Urban Resources Partnership: "Connecting Community and Environment" (Boston, MA/)
       Lead Agency: EPA
2. Camden - City of Children Partnering for a Better Future (Camden, NJ) Lead Agency: HUD
3. New York City Alternative Fuel Vehicle Summit (New York, NY) Lead Agency: DOE

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          1.4

-------
                                     	Chapter 1
                                      Environmental Justice at the Federal Level
4. Addressing Asthma in Puerto Rico-A Multi-Faceted Partnership for Results (Puerto Rico) Lead Agency:
HHS/HRSA
5. Bridges to Friendship Nurturing Environmental Justice in Southeast and Southwest Washington, DC
(Washington, DC) Lead Agency: DOD (Navy)
6. Community Cleanup and Revitalization in Arkwright/Forest Park (Spartanburg, SC) Lead Agency: EPA
1. Protecting Children's Health and Reducing Lead Exposure through Collaborative Partnerships (East St.
Louis, IL) Lead Agencies: EPA & HUD
8. Bethel New Life Power Park Assessment (Chicago, IL) Lead Agency: DOE
9. New Madrid County Tri-Community Child Health Champion Campaign (New Madrid County, MO) Lead
Agencies: EPA & USDA-NRCS
10. Easing Troubled Waters: Ensuring Safe Drinking Water Sources in Migrant Farmworker Communities
in Colorado (Colorado)  Lead Agency: EPA
11. Environmental Justice and Public Participation Through Technology: Defeating the Digital Divide and
Building Community Capacity (Savannah, GA and Fort Belknap Indian Reservation, MT) Lead Agency:
DOE
12. Protecting Community Health and Reducing Toxic Air Exposure through Collaborative Partnerships in
Barrio Logan (San Diego, CA) Lead Agency: EPA
13. Oregon Environmental Justice Initiative (Portland and Rural Communities, Oregon) Lead Agency: DOJ
14. Metlkatla Indian Community Unified Interagency Environmental Management Task Force (Ketchikan,
AK) Lead Agency: DOD
15. Environmental Justice in Indian Country: A Roundtable to Address Conceptual, Political and Statutory
Issues Lead Agency: DOE

Highlights of Projects

The Interagency Environmental  Justice Action Agenda is a new effort, begun in 2000.  Fifteen
National Interagency Environmental Justice Demonstration Projects were announced in May 2000.
Goals of these projects range from environmental cleanup, public health, children's health, economic
development, to  community capacity building. The IWG has also produced a directory  of
environmental justice contacts and a website  to ensure better access to federal agencies. The
Environmental Justice Action Agenda involves eleven federal agencies and has created partnerships
with all stakeholder groups, including communities; research, health, and philanthropic institutions;
tribal, state and local government; and business and industry. The Action Agenda can be found on
EPA's web site at the  following address:
http://www.epa.gov/oeca/main/ei/iwg/actionagenda.pdf  Specific accomplishments include:

  •    Environmental Justice Demonstration Projects have leveraged between $12 to $15 million
       in public/private resources, thus far.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                           1.5

-------
                                    	Chapter 1
                                     Environmental Justice at the Federal Level
  •    Re-Genesis, a community-based organization, is leading community cleanup and
       revitalization effort in two African American neighborhoods of Spartanburg, South Carolina.

  •    Children's health project in Camden, New Jersey is conducting outreach and education on
       lead and asthma through innovative efforts like a Lead Exploratorium.
  •     US Postal Service has committed $ 1.93 million for purchase of electric and alternative fuel
       vehicles for use in New York City's South Bronx.
  •    Bethel New Life, faith-based community development corporation in the West Garfield
       section of Chicago,  Illinois is using innovative "green" technology to turn abandoned
       industrial area into a revitalized economic center.
  •    Bridges to Friendship seeks to ensure that the local community benefits from Naval base
       cleanup and conversion in Washington, DC.
  •    East St. Louis, Illinois project has leveraged more than $4 million for lead assessment and
       abatement.
  •    California Air Resources Board selected Barrio Logan (San Diego, CA) as a model for its
       Neighborhood Assessment and Children's Health programs.
  •    Puerto Rico Asthma Coalition held a strategic planning conference of more than 700
       participants.
  •     Three rural communities in New Madrid County, Missouri has built a unique partnership to
       protect children's health in areas of lead, asthma/allergies and water quality.
  •     Community technology centers are being established in Savannah, Georgia & Fort Belknap,
       Montana through utilization of surplus government computers.
  •    Metlakatla, Alaska and East St. Louis, Illinois have been selected as National Brownfields
       Showcase Communities.
  •    Colorado farmworker project is developing GIS maps of migrant farmworker camps and
       drinking water sources.

Completed Demonstration Projects

American Indian/Alaskan Native Environmental Justice Roundtable.  Federal agencies  in
collaboration with tribes, tribal organizations and others held a National Tribal Environmental
Justice Roundtable, August 3 and 4,2000, in Albuquerque, New Mexico to identify the broad range
of cultural, religious, economic, social, legal and other issues related to environmental justice in
Indian country.  This effort grew out of a commitment by Federal agencies to tribal groups at the
June 1999 environmental justice conference in Hilton Head, SC.
 The Roundtable is one of 15 initial demonstration projects under the Environmental Justice Action

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          1.6

-------
                                    	Chapter 1
                                     Environmental Justice at the Federal Level
Agenda, developed by the Interagency Working Group. DOE was the lead agency for this effort with
assistance and support from EPA, DOJ, DOI, HHS, HUD, DOD and USDA.  Region 8, with the
assistance of Region 6 environmental justice staff, organized a site tour of the Petroglyph National
Monument in conjunction with the Roundtable.
       A  report on the  proceedings and recommendations created during the meeting can be
obtained by contacting EPA's Office of Environmental Justice.

                       Other Interagency Cooperation Efforts

Urban Resources Partnership. The Urban Resources Partnership (URP) brings together a number
of Federal and state agencies, non-profit organizations, local businesses, and other foundations in
selected cities across the country to provide funding and on-site technical assistance for community-
led  environmental projects.  EPA has been an active partner since URP's inception  in 1994,
providing resources and assistance to a number of local projects  which target under-served
communities. Projects include transforming blighted vacant areas into community gardens, parks,
and green community spaces, teaching young people environmental awareness, and restoring wildlife
habitats.  EPA's Office of Water provided assistance throughout 1999/2000 through serving on
URP' s National Steering Committee as well as providing continued technical and program guidance
and assistance. URP is an excellent example of partners coming together at all levels to successfully
accomplish on-the-ground projects in disadvantaged communities.

Region 1

Greater Boston Urban Resources Partnership. A model for interagency cooperation, coordination
and partnership is the  Greater Boston Urban  Resources  Partnership (GB-URP) "Connecting
Community and Environment".  This is an extraordinary place based model which demonstrates
Region 1's efforts to build community coalitions. This Partnership was initiated in 1995 by Region
1 with the specific purpose  of encouraging Federal agencies to target their resources to local
communities to  resolve public health and environmental issues. The GB-URP includes community
organizations and agencies, business, and Federal, state and  local  governments. A major  aspect of
the  Partnership  has  been its sustainability and  its ability to help urban communities carry out
strategies  that  link  social, economic, and environmental concerns.   Since its inception, the
Partnership has periodically assessed its goals and reassessed its priorities and currently has a strong
focus on livability issues.

       The GB-URP consists of 39  agencies, organizations, businesses, academia and local, state
and Federal government entities that have signed a Memorandum of Understanding committing
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          1.7

-------
                                    	Chapter 1
                                     Environmental Justice at the Federal Level
either financial or technical resources to the activities of the GB-URP. The partners consist of seven
(7) local non-profits, ten (10) regional non-profits, six (6) individuals or organizations from the
private sector, two (2) academic institutions, five (5) representatives of local government, five (5)
representatives of state government, and four federal government agencies including the Forest
Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Region 1's Urban Environmental Initiative, and
Housing and Urban Development. The GB-URP has an Executive Committee consisting of a Chair,
Co-chair, Treasurer and Clerk, as well as six at-large members.
       The GB-URP started out as a meeting between government agencies and community groups
seeking an explanation of the permitting process. It has evolved into a Partnership which:

1.      Encourages community involvement, serves community needs, and provides community
       benefits.
2.      Fosters cooperation among residents and government officials for the enhancement of the
       urban environment.
3.      Serves and involves low-income communities and those of color that have traditionally had
       little access to environmental resources.
4.      Plans  for long term sustainability and improvements that address community needs.

       The GB-URP model is improving efforts and strengthening relationships. While the goals
lie in the achievement of livable communities as communities define them, the process ensures
collaboration among parties with the resources and expertise to enhance a resident's quality of life.

Region 2

Asthma Summit. In May, 2000 Region 2 hosted a summit on asthma entitled the Environmental
Justice Children's Initiative along with the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the
Department of Health and Human Services. Officials from state agencies were invited to develop
a strategy  for filling the gaps in current action on asthma. Building on the national Cabinet-level
initiative to reduce environmental impacts of children's health, this regional strategy is focusing on
youngsters.   In order to complement rather than duplicate other regional initiatives (e.g., the
collaboration between  public  health officials  and managed care organizations), the  summit
emphasized prevention of exposure to known asthma triggers, in homes, schools and the outside
environment, instead of medical treatment of asthma.
       The goals of the summit were to identify opportunities for each agency to use its unique
leverage and capacity to reduce rates and  severity of asthma, and selecting one or two initiatives that
could benefit specifically from a regional  approach  and  cooperation  across public health,
environment, education and housing. This is an example of the federal partnerships the Region has
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          1.8

-------
                                    	Chapter 1
                                     Environmental Justice at the Federal Level
been involved in and continues to be involved in relative to environmental justice. For each project,
the Region is focusing on their sustainability and a replication by other communities.

Region 5

Protecting  Children's Health  and  Reducing Lead  Exposure  through  Collaborative
Partnerships. This collaborative partnership seeks to protect children's health by reducing lead
exposure in East St. Louis, IL and the St. Clair County region. Lead poisoning is an especially
devastating problem in East St. Louis, where children have been tested for rates four times the
national average. This collaboration consists of St. Mary's Hospital, Neighbors United for Progress,
Illinois Department of Public Health, St. Clair County (Intergovermental Grants Department),
Department of Housing and Urban Development, Army Corps of Engineers, and the EPA. It will
target environmental justice  areas for outreach, screening, testing and housing rehabilitation.
Through this collaborative effort, the groups will be able to avoid redundancy and maximize the use
of grant dollars.

Region 7

Partnership  with Department  of  Housing and Urban  Development.  Region  7  and the
Department of Housing and Urban Development  (HUD), Great Plains Region have  formed an
informal but strong partnership on issues of mutual responsibility and interest in environmental
justice communities.  HUD has been a supporter and active participant in Region 7's Diversity and
Environmental Justice activities. The Region has supported HUD on fair housing, civil rights, and
community building activities. HUD and the Region are putting into action the commitment federal
agencies have made to partner and leverage resources as we serve the public.

Region 8

Migrant Farm Worker Communities.  This project serves as one of 15 national demonstration
projects selected by the Environmental Justice Federal Interagency Action Agenda Working Group.
The project strives to identify and assess  the drinking water sources of migrant farmworker camps
in Colorado.  The project brings together various governmental agencies  as well as health  and
environmental groups to work collaboratively to  address the problems encountered with the
assessment.  EPA is the lead agency for this effort.  Other active government agencies include the
Departments of Health and Human Service, Labor, State, and Agriculture.

Region 9
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          1.9

-------
                                    	Chapter 1
                                     Environmental Justice at the Federal Level
Federal Regional Council. The Region 9 Federal Regional Council (FRC) is a partnership between
the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, Housing and Urban Development, Justice,
Interior, Transportation, Energy, and EPA. The FRC consists of three (3) committees: (1) Pacific
Island, (2) Tribal, and (3) Border. The FRC' purpose is to address the persistent problems in
impoverished areas throughout the region. Region 9 chairs the Border Committee and the East Palo
Alto Subcommittee.  The FRC has adopted two (2) geographic focus areas: North Richmond and
East Palo Alto, and has established two (2) task forces, one for each community. The East Palo Alto
task force focuses on directing federal attention toward issues such as redevelopment, crime, and
transportation.  Currently the FRC meets bi-monthly with the local government to discuss these
issues and to try to match need with resources.
    Through the efforts of the FRC, many sites have been cleaned up, training and employment
opportunities have increased, transportation services have improved, and community redevelopment
projects have been initiated. These successes are due to the partnerships that have been developed
between the federal,  state, county, and local agencies, as well as the private sector.

Border Air Monitoring Project.  The Border Air monitoring project was recently initiated by the
Environmental Health Coalition (EHC) in a low-income, Latino community in San Diego. This
community, called Barrio Logan, borders an industrialized section  of the  San Diego Bay and is
considered  by many to be one of the most polluted communities in the county. Barrio Logan is
surrounded by freeways, and is subject to the annual release of three million pounds of toxic air
pollution from multiple small industrial sources. The respiratory health hazard index for the Barrio
Logan area is 100-200 times above acceptable levels, and up to 20 percent of children in the area
suffer from severe breathing problems. Despite this, there were no air monitors in the area to assess
the extent of the air pollution.
    Representing the Barrio Logan community, the Environmental Health Coalition (EHC) worked
with the San Diego Air Pollution Control District (APCD) to obtain a temporary air monitoring
station (initially 6 months) to be placed at Memorial Academy, a local Barrio Logan high school.
EHC, along with a coalition of stakeholders which included the San Diego American  Lung
Association, the Industry  Alliance, the San Diego Unified School District, the Board of County
Supervisors, the local Perkins Elementary School, and Community Family Health Centers persuaded
the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to finance a six month air monitoring station to measure
the pollutants impacting the community.
                 National Environmental Policy Act Implementation

Region 3

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         1.10

-------
                                    	Chapter 1
                                     Environmental Justice at the Federal Level
King William  Reservoir,  Virginia.  The Regional Raw Water Study Group (RRWSG), a
consortium of local governments on Virginia's Lower Peninsula, are proposing the construction of
a dam, fresh water reservoir, and a pumping station in rural King William County, Virginia.  The
dam would create a 1,500 acre reservoir on Cohoke Creek by pumping water from the Mattaponi
River.   The proposed project  may impact the social  structure and sense of community of the
Mattaponi, Upper Mattaponi and Pamunkey Indian tribes. The reservoir would be located between
the tribes' reservations. Construction of the reservoir and it's potential secondary impacts such as
residential development,  raise  issues related to the preservation  of the cultural, spiritual, and
archaeological integrity of the tribes.  The project will result in the loss of 437 acres of wetlands in
the Cohoke Mill Creek watershed. The construction of the reservoir will take place within the three
mile buffer zone of the Mattaponi Indian Reservation. The tribes opposition relies, in part, on a state
recognized treaty which does not allow any encroachment within a 3 mile radius of the reservation.
The tribes are contending that if the reservoir is allowed they will lose a vital part of their cultural
heritage. The Mattaponi maintain that the reservoir will threaten their historical use of the river and
the land within the Cohoke watershed. Both tribes rely heavily on the land and water as a source of
food, economic benefit and spiritual identity. The tribes met with EPA Region 3 on several occasions
to solicit the Agency's assistance in ensuring their environmental justice issues were understood and
addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).
   In a July 1997 letter, Region 3 stated that the FEIS did not contain a full and complete analysis
of the impact of the reservoir's construction on the environmental justice communities in the area,
in accordance with the President's Executive Order on Environmental Justice (EO12898), or contain
a valid wetlands replacement plan.  As a result, Region 3 requested that the Norfolk District of the
Army Corps of Engineers require a supplement to the FEIS focusing on the wetland mitigation issues
and the Native American cultural issues.  On June 4, 1999, the Army Corps issued a preliminary
decision to deny the Clean Water Act §404 Permit for lack of a demonstrated need to destroy 437
acres of wetlands, and potentially cause cumulative adverse environmental impacts, particularly to
the American Indian population. The Army Corps extended the public comment period to July 16,
1999 on their decision to deny the permit.  Region 3 will continue to work closely with the Army
Corps to enhance its understanding of the environmental justice issues of concern pertaining to this
project
Region 8

Zortman-Landusky Mine Reclamation.  A 1992 proposed expansion of two gold mines, which
had been operating since the late 1970s near the Fort Belknap Reservation in Montana, prompted

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          1.11

-------
                                    	Chapter 1
                                     Environmental Justice at the Federal Level
the involvement of EPA's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  and National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) programs. The mines are located on lands that were
originally part of the Reservation. The mines underwent a series of prior expansions before Bureau
of Land Management (BLM) officials required an environmental impact statement. In November
1998, the Interior Board of Land Appeals remanded the Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS) to BLM based, in part, on BLM's inadequate consultation with the Fort Belknap Tribes and
the lack of sufficient information about ground water at the sites.   Region 8 provided technical
comments on a ground-water study developed since the FEIS, and will encourage BLM to effectively
consult with the Fort Belknap Community Council, and larger tribal community on the selection of
the reclamation alternative. Environmental justice program staff were part of the NEPA review team
and also successfully sought funding to  allow the Fort Belknap Community Council  to use
independent technical expertise in the review of water quality monitoring data. Environmental justice
program staff also facilitated efforts to design a tribal consultation plan to allow the BLM to meet
the intent of arecent Interior Board of Land Appeals decision remanding the EIS to the BLM based,
in part, on inadequate tribal consultation.

Master Manual for Operations of the Missouri River. The Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is
in the process of revising its Master Control Manual for operation of the Pick Sloan system of dams
along the Missouri River. The Missouri River Basin is home to 19  tribal nations, many which are
impacted by the management of the Missouri River. The environmental justice program has devoted
resources to an internal team formed to review the NEPA documentation produced by the Corps
associated with the review of the Master Manual. Environmental justice program staff also serve on
a community based environmental protection (CBEP)  team  devoted to  the Missouri River, and
administer  grants to the Mni  Sose  Intertribal Water Rights  Coalition, a consortia of tribal
governments in the Basin.

Devils Lake Study.  Region 8 assisted the Army Corps of Engineers in providing a qualitative
assessment of the social impacts  and potential environmental justice concerns of the proposed
Emergency Outlet to  control flooding  at Devils Lake, North Dakota. Data were collected during
1999 by means of telephone interviews with respondents from various communities throughout the
Devils Lake region. This study has attracted the interest of the Canadian government, the Office of
Federal Activities, the Office of International Affairs and other agencies.

Transportation. Environmental justice staff are currently working with the 1-70 Project Team to
provide environmental justice and social impact assessment assistance for the proposed 1-70
Highway expansion in Colorado.  Staff members are working with the Colorado Department of
Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, and its contractors to develop an assessment
methodology for environmental justice to be included in the programmatic EIS for the expansion.

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         1.12

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
       This chapter highlights a wide variety of allegations of environmental injustice and the efforts
taken to find solutions to these environmental and public health problems. The allegations described
here include those that communities have identified and those which EPA has identified through its
own assessments or through the assessments of others concerned about issues of environmental
justice.
       In many instances, EPA is working collaboratively and in partnership with the communities
and other stakeholders, including federal agencies, as well as state and tribal governments, to
develop solutions to the problems identified. EPA recognizes that impacted communities frequently
have critical knowledge and  ability to help resolve local environmental and public health issues.
Therefore,  the Agency is working to ensure the  active participation of concerned community
organizations and individuals in  their efforts to  address environmental justice concerns.  This
chapter describes some of the unique partnerships which have formed between EPA and various
stakeholders to achieve environmental justice for all communities.
                            Lead Problems and Solutions

Spanish Public Education Campaign on Lead. Through a cooperative agreement, the Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics/National Program Chemicals Division (OPPT/NPCD) supported
EVS Communications and its public health partner, the National Council of LaRaza's Center for
Health Promotion, in the development of the nation's  first Spanish-language television public
education campaign on the problem of lead poisoning in the home.  As a result of this award-
winning effort, millions of Latino families  were given their first exposure to general information
about the most common places where lead can be found, and about the serious health consequences
suffered by children and adults who come into contact with this dangerous environmental hazard.
Department of Justice Lead Educational Materials. OPPT/NPCD worked with the Department
of Justice (DOJ) to assist communities in educating the public about the health risks of lead paint,
identifying safe remediation methods and conducting blood lead level screenings in young children.
Lead education information packets were sent to 250 coordinators of the DOJ's Weed & Seed
program, one of DOJ's most extensive community-based programs to prevent, control, and reduce
violent crime, drug abuse, and gang activity in targeted high-crime neighborhoods across the country.
These lead education packets were also sent to FBI Adopt-A-School Programs, Regional Community
Policing Institutes and to Environmental Coordinators in  each of the 94 United  States Attorneys
Offices.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          2.1

-------
                                  	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
Region 1
Lead Safe Yard Project, Boston. Through the  Environmental Monitoring Public Access and
Community Tracking (BMP ACT) program, Region 1 funded the Community-Based Environmental
Lead Assessment and Educational Demonstration Program (a.k.a. Dorchester Lead Safe Yard Project
- DLSYP.)   This project was initiated with community partners to implement a pilot study to
demonstrate how low cost/no cost techniques can reduce the exposure risk of preschool children to
elevated levels of lead in soil within the target community and to set up a template which other
communities could use to address this persistent lead issue. The community partners include Boston
University School of Public Health, the Bowdoin  Street Community Health Center (BSHC), and
Dorchester Gardenlands, a Boston-based landscape company.  The target community is the Bowdoin
Street area in the North Dorchester section of Boston. There are roughly 150 homes in this target
community.
       Three important tasks were established to complete this project: (1) a community lead
education and outreach program, conducted through community organizers to further develop
community awareness of the dangers of lead poisoning and to enroll property owners into the project,
(2) a sampling and  analysis program to characterize enlisted properties, and  (3)  an  abatement
program to mitigate residential soils that contain high concentrations of lead.
       The pilot was initially funded in two phases which took place during the summers of 1998
and 1999. At the completion of the second phase of this project in the fall of 1999, 42 residences
had been addressed by the program, a template (tool kit that provides the basic materials necessary
to initiate a lead safe  yard project) had been developed, the team had conducted numerous seminars
on lead safe yard work, and Lead Safe Boston,  an office within the Boston Public Facilities
Department, had begun plans to implement a lead safe yard program using the DLSYP template.
       The DLSYP  project was funded to deliver relevant environmental data to the public and to
develop communication tools that might sustain the activity beyond the specific EMPACT funded
program. These objectives have been largely achieved at the conclusion of Phase Two, although the
third phase of the project has been  funded. This phase will be used to demonstrate a coordinated
effort between city-funded structural abatement and a lead safe yard program with the goal of
achieving a more holistic solution.  In this final phase of the project, EPA proposes a supplemental
effort to  quantify the  effectiveness of low-cost  residential soil intervention.  The Agency has
partnered with the National Center for Lead Safe Housing (NCLSH), the Lead-Safe Boston program
office within the Boston Department of Neighborhood Development (LSB), and the Boston Health
Department (BHD) to file for Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funding  to leverage a new
phase of the EMPACT project.

Safe Housing Lead  Task Force Steering Committee, Rhode Island.    A mayoral  task force
created a comprehensive set of recommendations to eliminate lead poisoning in Providence, Rhode
Island-including enforcement, securing financial resources, and education and outreach. The Lead

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.2

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
Task  Force Steering Committee, consisting of representatives  from community groups, the
Providence Housing Authority, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Rhode
Island Department of Public Health, Region 1 and the Attorney General' s Office, has developed and
are currently tracking  implementation of the  task force recommendations through  a Goals
Management Plan.  The Steering Committee meets quarterly to track progress against specific goals
and tasks outlined in the Goals Management Plan.  The Steering Committee has also developed a
public reporting process to keep residents informed on progress to date.

Lead Abatement Project for Rhode Island Daycare Centers. As a result of a nearly $500,000
lead abatement initiative launched by Region 1 and Rhode Island, children will be safer at dozens
of day-care facilities. The initiative was made possible through an enforcement case brought by the
EPA against the Rhode Island Department of Transportation (DOT).
       The lead-abatement project was initiated in response to severe lead poisoning among Rhode
Island's children. Although rates of childhood  lead poisoning declined from 22%  of children
screened in 1994 to just over 12 % in 1997, Rhode Island's rates are still three times greater than the
national average. The problem is especially critical in cities like Providence and Central Falls, where
more than 25 %  of kindergarten-aged children tested by the Rhode Island Department of Health had
lead poisoning!
       The project, which will be implemented over the next 18 months, is being funded by the
Rhode Island DOT as part of an enforcement settlement initiated by EPA last spring for widespread
environmental violations at a DOT facility in downtown Providence.
       The settlement stems from  numerous  environmental  violations  that EPA  inspectors
discovered in 1997 at the DOT complex at 90 Calverley Street, including improper storage and
handling of large amounts of hazardous waste. Investigators also discovered violations of the Clean
Water Act, including the failure to take spill-prevention measures and the illegal discharge of oil into
the Woonasquatucket River.
       DOT also has agreed under the settlement to pay a $100,000 civil penalty and to spend
$15,000 to fund two  one-day environmental compliance training sessions for  Rhode Island's
municipalities. One of several lead-abatement projects EPA has initiated in Rhode Island, includes
the investment of $438,500 by DOT, as part of the settlement, to remove lead-contaminated paint
and soils from licensed day-care facilities all across the state.
       The project, administered by the Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage Finance Corp., will
provide matching funds for facilities identified as posing a health risk based on a recent survey by
the state Health Department. Completed in December 1999, the Health Department surveyed about
220 licensed day-care facilities, of which roughly half are considered to be lead safe. Just over 100
of the facilities-including 27 in Providence alone-had some sort of lead contamination problem, such
as elevated lead levels in the soil or peeling/chipping lead paint inside or outside the buildings.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          2.3

-------
                                  	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
Region 2

Lead in Older Homes. Lead poisoning is an issue of high priority for Region 2's Pesticides and
Toxic Substances Branch since low-income families, Asians, Hispanics and African Americans
living in older housing or urban centers are disproportionately impacted. Region 2 has one of the
largest percentages of old housing stock in the United States.  Approximately three quarters of U.S.
homes constructed before 1978 contain some kind of lead paint. However, in New Jersey, that
number is closer to 85%,  and that number rises to 90% in New York.  Additionally, 14% of the
children of New Jersey are from poor families, and the percentage rises to 25% of children in New
York State.
       The health affects of lead on children, even at low levels can cause nervous system and
kidney damage, learning disabilities, Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD), and decreased intelligence.
Speech, language and behavior problems, poor muscle coordination, decreased muscle and bone
growth and hearing damage. As a result, EPA knows it is critical that an effort be made by multiple
agencies to effect a  change with regard to this environmental hazard.  Region 2 has taken the
following steps. An interagency group was initiated by the Office of the Regional Administrator to
use  the  strengths   and  resources  of different  agencies  to ensure that  low-income,  and
disproportionately impacted communities are receiving maximum attention.  Region 2 partnered
with the New Jersey Interagency Task Force on the Prevention of Lead Poisoning, and the University
of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey in collaboration with Ramapo College to identify,
consolidate, compile, prepare and disseminate information on lead issues for inner city New Jersey
schools; and awarded grant pilots for projects in Syracuse, NY, New York City and Camden, NJ.
       Additional information is provided at the following web address:
www. epa. gov/region02/health/leadpoisoning

Region 3

City of Chester Lead Initiative - Supplemental Environmental Project. As part of the Office
of Enforcement, Compliance and  Environmental Justice's Chester Initiative, supported by
community organizations, work continues on the Chester Lead Poisoning Prevention Proj ect funded
by a supplemental environmental project (SEP).  The  SEP is a project which is attempting to
complete a children's blood-lead survey and massive public education about the effects of lead on
residents, especially children, in Chester, Pennsylvania. The SEP also includes the removal of lead
contamination from homes.

Lead in Logan Community, Philadelphia. The Logan section of Philadelphia is predominately
African American. For years, many of the homes were sinking because the homes were constructed
on top of a filled in streambed. Eventually these homes were condemned and the residents relocated.
The City of Philadelphia tore down many of these homes in a 17 block area. Sampling by Region

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          2.4

-------
                                  	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
3 found soil in the now vacant lots to have unacceptable concentrations of lead.  Region 3 and the
City entered into a Memorandum of Agreement in October 2000, whereby the City would perform
the necessary soil removal, and other activities, with Region 3's Office of Enforcement, Compliance
and Environmental Justice in an oversight role.  The community has been very active in pursuing
a remedy for the lead problem.

Region 10

Childhood Lead Poisoning, Oregon. A study conducted by the Oregon Health Division revealed
that nearly 1 in 10 Latino, Native American and African American children residing in Oregon have
lead concentrations in their blood greater than the Federal acceptable level.  Region 10 funded the
Urban League of Portland through the Environmental Justice Small Grants Program to inform and
educate the low-income and people  of color communities in Portland about the problems of
childhood lead poisoning, its sources, and how to reduce exposure, increase the number of high-risk
children tested  for exposure to  lead, and to develop the capacity of community leaders, and
policymakers  to advocate for and implement effective lead poisoning prevention programs.
       On January 18, 2000, members of Region 10's Office of Civil Rights and Environmental
Justice, the City of Portland, the Portland Health Department and numerous community groups
(Environmental Justice Action Group, Urban League of Portland), held the first of what are now
quarterly Lead Summits.  The summit identified those  areas of Portland most impacted by lead
poisoning, the roles and responsibilities of the community groups and agencies working on the issue,
and began to identify the gaps in current lead poisoning  prevention programs.  One of the biggest
issues identified at the summit was the limited number of certified lead abatement companies.
                         Permitting Problems and Solutions

Region 6

Citizens' Air Permitting Workshop, Louisiana. On April 8,2000, in order to further the Agency's
environmental justice initiative, Region 6 participated in a "first ever" Air Permits Workshop, in
Sulphur, Louisiana, with the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ), to introduce
citizens to the complicated procedures  of applying for and receiving an air permit.  LDEQ and
Region 6's Air Permits staff set up shop in the Holiday Inn Express, in Sulphur, Louisiana, with
exhibits, charts  and computers, to explain  what a company must do to obtain an air permit,
emphasizing the roles of the two agencies as well as the roles of citizens.  The idea  of a permit
workshop evolved from the October Calcasieu Parish Community Quarterly Meeting that Region
6 and LDEQ hosted in order to solve the environmental problems of that area. Approximately 35
citizens attended and seemed to appreciate the effort and good will of the two agencies in this first

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.5

-------
                                  	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
major citizens' outreach effort. LDEQ and Region 6 are discussing the success of the workshop and
evaluating it along with future outreach commitments.

Water Discharge Permit Evaluations, Louisiana.  The Region 6 National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permits Branch has reviewed existing permit applications of four
industrial dischargers (Olin, Conoco, Condea Vista and PPG) located in the Calcasieu Parish area,
point sources determined by NPDES  Branch to be potential dischargers of dioxin. Although the
reviewed applications cited no discharge of dioxin at levels harmful to aquatic life and human health,
the facilities are not required to routinely test for dioxin during the NPDES application renewal
process. Correspondence (dated, December 21 and 22, 1999) directed LDEQ to follow procedures
which give Region 6 an expanded role in permit review. Oversight of permits for minor discharges
to impaired waters are now under the oversight of EPA where previously only major discharges were
being reviewed. The process makes permit issuance for dischargers to impaired water bodies the top
priority. Discussions between Region 6 and LDEQ target the impaired Calcasieu Parish basin as a
very high priority for permit issuance and direct EPA review.

Region 9

South Phoenix RCRA Facilities, Arizona. The efforts of three facilities in the South Phoenix area
to obtain permits has raised the concerns of residents. The first facility, Innovative Waste Utilization
(IWU) has drawn high levels of attention. Over 150 people attended a public meeting that was held
in November 1999. Concerns included opposition to the expansion of the facility, siting of the
facility in an environmental justice community, the cumulative impacts of other industrial facilities
in the area, the lack of public knowledge that the facility was operating for 20 years under interim
status, and the distrust of government environmental agencies.  The other facilities include Onyx
Environmental Services which is seeking renewal of their current storage permit; and Safety Kleen
Southwest which is seeking a permit to store, treat and recycle hazardous waste.  Region 9 has been
working closely with the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to  ensure that
environmental justice is a priority in the decisionmaking process.

California Energy Commission (CEC) Permitting of Power Plants in California. Region 9 has
been working with the California Energy Commission (CEC) on environmental justice issues
surrounding the permitting of over 30 new power generating facilities in California. Region 9 is
working closely with CEC  to ensure  that environmental justice  issues  are addressed.   An
Environmental Justice Roundtable was held in Sacramento, CA in April 2000 that brought major
stakeholder groups together, including  EPA, CEC, developers, environmental justice advocates,
community leaders, and other government entities.  The purpose of the dialogue was to discuss
issues such as demographics, risk assessments, public participation and disproportionate impacts.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          2.6

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                    Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
                           Pesticide Problems and Solutions
Worker Protection Training.  The Office of Pollution Prevention (OPP) has provided funding to
several farmworker organizations to develop pesticide safety training and education programs, and
to test the effectiveness of different approaches and materials. OPP has developed and tested the use
of posters, handbooks, videos, pocket guides, flip charts, radio programs, audio tapes, pocket guides
and laminated cards.  Since farmworkers are  predominantly non-English  speaking, with low
education levels, and high migrant and seasonal populations, outreach to this community has been
challenging. OPP has worked with farmworker outreach and service organizations, as well as the
grower  organizations and state agencies, to distribute materials  and make training resources
available.
       Through  assistance from OPP,  the Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs
(AFOP) has conducted a national pesticide safety education program working with 37 community-
based farmworker organizations in 19 states. Working with the AmeriCorps programs, they have
conducted training primarily in Spanish, but also in English, Vietnamese, Tagalog and Creole. With
assistance from OPP, AFOP has developed, tested, and evaluated  pesticide education materials,
including radio programs, for English as a second language curriculum on pesticide safety and
interactive approaches to protect farmworkers from pesticide hazards. They have trained more than
200,000 workers, families, children, and community members about pesticide safety and are
expanding their outreach to children and their families with new programs and materials.
       OPP has also funded other organizations to develop outreach programs to farmworkers and
conduct training about pesticide safety.  The Farmworker Health and Safety Institute, the National
Center for  Farmworker Health, the Farmworker Women's Leadership Project, Hispanic Radio
Network and the Yakima Valley Farm Workers'  Clinic are working with OPP to develop different
approaches to reach farmworkers for pesticides safety that comply with Worker Protection Standard
training requirements.
National Strategies for Health Care Providers. In April 1998, OPP held a workshop to initiate
a multi-agency effort to create a national plan for increased training and awareness among health
care providers of pesticides-related health conditions-"Pesticides and National Strategies for Health
Care Providers." It is essential that health care providers recognize, manage and prevent pesticide-
related health conditions in their patients and communities.
       This initiative is led by OPP in partnership with the Department of Labor (DOL), Health and
Human Services (HHS), and the Department of Agriculture (USD A). Workshop proceedings were
distributed and  a working  group  developed a  draft  implementation  strategy.   The  draft
Implementation Plan is available for public review and comment. A national meeting is anticipated
in early 2001 to provide a forum for public discussion of the final recommendations.

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          2.7

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                    Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
Region 4

Protecting the Elderly From Pesticide Misuse, Kentucky. Kentucky, through partial funding from
Region 4, conducts project Reach Out to Protect the Elderly (ROPE) in Southeast Kentucky. ROPE
educates the elderly on pesticide issues in order to reduce pesticide misuse and pesticide application
from unlicenced applicators. In addition to the Cumberland Valley Health Department, home health
care services and community action agencies have committed to assist in the distribution of material
developed under this grant. The grant dollars are spent for the development of brochures and other
educational materials, inspection supplies, site presentations and visits.  A brochure  stressing the
proper use of pesticides and how to hire a pest control operator is in draft format. The Structural
Branch Manager, has met with the Kentucky State Police and community leaders and is getting a
listing of key groups in Harlan  County to help publicize this effort.  The Attorney General has
expressed interest and support for Proj ect ROPE and would like to see it implemented on a statewide
basis.  Region 4 anticipates the balance of the funding for Project ROPE will be awarded this fiscal
year.

Region 9

Reducing Pesticide Misuse, California. Region 9  is supporting a national initiative on urban
misuse of pesticides. Two  unregistered  products have been targeted for their risks to children:
insecticidal chalk and unregistered moth repellents. Insecticidal chalk is a special concern because
it looks like ordinary blackboard chalk and the public may mistakenly believe it is safe.  Poison
Control Centers nationwide have received hundreds of reports of children exposed to these chalks.
Region 9 is working with state partners to develop an enforcement and public outreach strategy to
eliminate the import, sale, and use of this product. An educational brochure, highlighting the hazard
to children, has been developed and translated into Spanish, Vietnamese, and Chinese. Region 9 is
also concerned about possible use of this product at school sites and has initiated a compliance
assistance campaign to educate school maintenance personnel about the importance of using only
registered products and of following label directions for safe use.  Region 9 issued a press release
to publicize the risks these products pose to children and has filed civil complaints  against two
companies selling insecticidal chalk and three companies selling unregistered moth repellents.
Farmworker Safety in San Luis Obispo, California.  The Environmental Center of San Luis
Obispo (ECOSLO) is working to minimize environmental health risks facing farmworkers and to
facilitate and improve communication and coordination among farmworker support groups and the
county's environmental health stakeholders. Beginning in June 2000,200 hundred farmworkers and
their families will be  surveyed by the  California Department of Health Services (CDHS) and

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          2.8

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
community health workers from Promotoras Comunitarias and Head Start. The purpose of this effort
is to determine the impact of California's worker safety regulations on farmworker health.  Survey
participants will be drawn from outreach efforts in San Luis Obispo County.
             Persistent Bio-Accumulative Toxins Problems and Solutions

Persistent Bio-Accumulative Toxins (PBT) Initiative and Alaskan Tribes. EPA is increasingly
concerned about a set of toxic chemicals  that don't break down easily in the  environment -
chemicals known for their high toxicity, and for their ability to build up in the foodchain, and is
making these chemicals a high priority for further reductions in the environment. This effort, named
the Persistent, Bio-accumulative, and Toxic Pollutants (PBT) Initiative, will pay particular attention
to human populations and ecosystems that have high exposures to PBT contaminants.
       Alaska and Alaska Natives  are particularly challenged by PBTs, because PBTs tend to
accumulate in cold climates like Alaska, and Alaska Natives are heavily dependent on Alaskan
wildlife, which accumulate elevated amounts of PBT's in their fatty tissues. Alaska Natives have
been very interested in having analysis done to learn what the PBT concentrations are in the
subsistence foods  they rely on.  A few years ago, Region 10 and the Office  of Indoor Air and
Radiation (OAR)  launched the Traditional  Knowledge  Project, an effort that aims to build the
capacity among Alaska Native tribes to address their own concerns about toxic and radionuclides
contamination and changes in their environment. In FY 2000, Region 10, OAR, along with several
more  EPA offices, have provided resources to Alaska Native tribes along the Pacific coast to
complete laboratory analysis of sea gull eggs they've collected to assess  the level of PBT
contamination. This may be only the second time that such laboratory analysis has been conducted
in Alaska, and the first time that tribes have had significant  control in terms of designing the
analysis.  The tribes have been trained to collect samples for analysis, using a tribal consensual
process for  choosing  species of animals for analysis, and the tribes have  determined which
contaminants to analyze. Members of Alaska Native tribes from southeast Alaska to the western tip
of the Aleutian Island Chain will be able to participate in this initiative.  The information collected
will also become a part of the international environmental data collection on the Arctic and near-
Arctic regions.
       In addition, Region 10 and OPPT are working together on the FY 2000 tribal  budget
initiative.  The first year of the project has been supported by Region 10's multi-year Tradition
Knowledge Project.  Program directions for  later years are currently being explored.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          2.9

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                    Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
                     Fish Contamination Problems and Solutions

Alaskan Watershed Assistance.  The Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, through a
cooperative agreement with the River Network, has supported two Watershed Assistance Grants
(WAGs) in Alaskan communities to support watershed-wide networks of community-based groups
and to help strengthen their capacities to secure long-term watershed protection strategies.
       One WAG supported activities in the Cook Inlet basin in Homer, Alaska, with special focus
in the Alaska Native villages.  Cook Inlet communities receive technical support with Geographic
Information Systems (GIS) projects, volunteer water quality monitoring support, and networking
support by building the capacity of community-based watershed groups.  Another WAG in the
Native Village of Kwinhagak (NVK) helped establish key partnerships and build capacity for NVK
to manage watershed concerns by supporting activities such as: hiring watershed technical support
staff, and providing assistance with issues relating to water rights and management responsibilities
in the Topiak National Wildlife Refuge (which encompasses NVK).

Washington, D.C. Volunteer Water Monitoring Workshop.  In  October, 2000  the  Coastal
Management Branch conducted a two-day Volunteer Water Monitoring Workshop in Washington,
D.C.  The Workshop provided a  forum for training volunteer water monitor leaders in the
Washington, D.C. area. The key partner was  the Earth Conservation Corps, which includes low-
income minority residents of the Washington, D.C. area. The Workshop provided training in all
aspects of monitoring, including data collection, analysis, and quality assurance/quality control.
Related issues such as publicity,  fund-raising, and partnerships were  also covered,  and to
accommodate the needs of young adult leaders, a roundtable on water monitoring careers  was
conducted. One of the goals of this effort is to have a positive influence and focus on building the
capacity of at-risk young adults so that they will become future leaders and role models for other
disadvantaged youth in the area.

Region 9

DDT and PCB Contamination in Fish, California. A large deposit of contaminated sediment off
the coast of the Palos Verdes Shelf is responsible for elevated DDT and PCB levels in white croaker
and other fish from that area that are popular within the Asian community. Region 9's Superfund
Program began its investigation of the Palos Verdes Shelf in July  1996.  The investigation is
ongoing, but the results of the human health risk evaluation indicate that the consumption of certain
fish from this area, particularly white croaker, may pose serious health risks to recreational anglers
and their families. Also, despite the commercial fishing ban on white croaker from the Palos Verdes
Shelf area, contaminated white croaker continue to turn up in local fish markets (primarily in Asian
communities).  In March 2000, Region 9 issued a Proposed  Plan for institutional controls
(enforcement, public outreach/education and monitoring) as an interim response action for the area.

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          2.10

-------
                                  	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
In July 2000, Region 9 began field work on a 3 month pilot capping project at the Palos Verdes Shelf
that is designed to evaluate methods of cap construction and the  associated short-term impacts.
California Department of Health Services (CDHS) will oversee and evaluate the field testing of
outreach materials and programs. After evaluating public comments, Region 9 will issue a decision
on implementing the institutional controls described in the Proposed Plan. The Agency has also
provided funds to the CDHS to develop a pilot public outreach and education plan on  the fish
consumption advisories. CDHS is currently working with several community-based organizations
to develop pilot outreach materials and programs that will be tested.
Region 10

Asian and Pacific Islander Fish and Shellfish Consumption Studies, Washington. A study was
conducted by Region 10, the University of Washington, National Institute for Environmental Health
Sciences, and the Refugee Federation Service Center in Seattle, Washington to describe and quantify
the seafood consumption habits of the Asian and Pacific Islander (API) communities within King
County. The study was a first step towards gathering necessary information to determine what risks
the API communities may face from
consuming contaminated seafood and
to balance  such  risks  with  the
significant health and cultural benefits
associated with seafood consumption.
Results of the study indicate that the
API communities consumed seafood -
at a  very high  rate  with  the *
predominate seafood consumed being '
shellfish.    First  generation  APIs
consumed more fish than the second ;
generation APIs and members  of the
Vietnamese   and   Japanese
communities   had  the  highest
consumption and the Mien, Hmong
and Samoan communities consumed the least seafood. The study results also indicated that members
of the Mien, Hmong and Laotian communities consumed more seafood that was harvested from local
waters, rather than purchased commercially, and that members of the API community were interested
in learning more about health issues  surrounding eating fish, the safety of seafood harvested from
local waters, and the safe preparation methods of seafood.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.11

-------
	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems


Tribal Fish Consumption Studies, Washington.  The Tulalip and Squaxin Island Tribes of the
Puget Sound Region of Washington, in cooperation with Region 10's Office of Water, conducted a
survey of their communities to determine their fish and shellfish consumption rates.  The survey
included all age groups and obtained information on the species and fish parts consumed, preparation
methods, and sources of fish.  Information from the interviews was utilized to develop weight-
adjusted consumption rates by tribe, age, gender, income and species groups.  The results of the
surveys indicated that the consumption rates were high with adult males having  the highest
consumption rates and the fish were prepared and eaten in a manner that tended  to reduce intake of
contaminants.

                       Drinking Water Problems  and Solutions

Region 6
Comprehensive Performance Evaluation (CPE) of Drinking Water in Mossville, Louisiana.
In response to citizen concerns regarding drinking water quality in Mossville, LA, Region 6 sampled
the Mossville system in 1998 for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), and in 1999 for dioxin. No
compounds were detected above the drinking water standards for any compound tested. The first
ever CPE at the Mossville public water system was conducted in 1999 by Region 6 and the Louisiana
Department of Health and Hospitals (LDHH-the primacy agency responsible for implementing the
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) in LA). The Mossville system is in compliance with all SDWA
standards, but the CPE identified some performance limiting factors that the operator began working
on immediately  to correct.
Region 10

Contaminated Drinking Water in Alaska Native Villages. Office of Water is currently funding
a pilot program, at the request of Alaska villages, that is assessing the quality of traditional sources
of drinking water and the potable water transport mechanisms, in three rural Alaska villages. The
goal of the program is to raise awareness of possible sources and routes of contamination, and help
the Native Villages make informed decisions about their drinking water.  Initial assessment results
indicate that the majority of the sources and transport mechanisms are contaminated with coliform
bacteria at levels that can pose serious health effects.	

                      Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations
Region 6

Concentrated Animal Feeding  Operations (CAFOs) in Region 6 are being evaluated  with  a
cumulative risk screening methodology  created  by the Region.   The methodology accesses

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.12

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                    Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
demographic information regarding population, proximity of residents to potential pollution sources,
minority representation, and economic status of evaluated rural communities, which is of use to the
CAFO industries.  The CAFO industries in Oklahoma are using the risk - environmental justice
analysis to assess their present locations and to evaluate future corporate farm sites. The information
has been incorporated into industry environmental impact statements submitted to Region 6.
                                                         Animal Feeding Operations
                                                 "Feedlots" have been at the center of a number of
                                                 environmental justice complaints and highly visible
                                                 ecological problems (e.g., new hog operations in poor
                                                 African-American communities in eastern North
                                                 Carolina and the possibility of pfiesteria. outbreaks).
Communities with Multiple Problems

Anacostia River Cleanup, Washington, D.C.  The Ocean, Coastal Protection Division, of EPA'
Office of Water, has partnered with the Center for Marine Conservation (CMC) to establish and
maintain the annual International Coastal Cleanup Campaign (ICCC). The ICCC has the largest
volunteer environmental data gathering and associated cleanup of coastal and underwater areas in
the world.  It is designed to increase public awareness about the impact of trash on our aquatic
environments. The ICCC provides inspiration to hundreds of thousands of people who will mobilize
along our waterways and beaches for the annual cleanup on the third Saturday of every September.
Since 1986, the cleanup has grown from 2,800 volunteers on the coast of Texas  to more than
500,000 volunteers in 55 states and territories of the U.S. and more than 90 countries annually.  In
1998, over 509,000 volunteers from 74 countries cleaned up 5,300,484 pounds of trash from 12,169
miles of beaches and underwater sites. Once the trash has been collected, it is cataloged and the data
is sent to the CMC for compilation and dissemination.  Since 1986, EPA has provided financial,
technical, and volunteer support to this effort. One of the locations EPA has focused on to address
aquatic debris in the Washington, DC area is a tributary of the Anacostia River. The cleanup site
is located in a minority neighborhood near the Anacostia River and has been popular for EPA
employees and local communities for many years.  Since this particular effort is designed to address
the impact of debris in this impoverished area and help create local sustainability of the Anacostia
River, EPA, CMC, and the National Park Service will  continue  to partner  to increase local
neighborhood  participation in this event.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          2.13

-------
                                  	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
Region 1
Alternatives for Community & Environment (ACE) Smart Redevelopment for Roxbury,
Massachusetts. Based in Roxbury, Boston's poorest neighborhood of color, ACE works with low-
income communities and communities of color throughout Massachusetts to solve environmental
and public health problems and build environmental leadership. This project brought together
ACE's neighborhood partners to create  strategies to  integrate transportation, economic, and
environmental concerns into proposed developments. To capitalize on the unprecedented economic
boom in Boston, ACE  has  been working  to  ensure that development  is  accompanied by
transportation and environmental improvements. These improvements will  provide long-lasting
benefits for those who live, learn, work, and play in Roxbury.  Funding from Region 1 supports
development of strategies for educating residents about the current development process, ensuring
that resident concerns are addressed during the development planning and review process, and
assessing the cumulative impacts of proposed projects.
South Branch of the Park River - Urban Greenspace Revitalization Project, Connecticut. The
Eastern Connecticut Resource Conservation and Development Area (CTRC&D) program was
created to assist local citizens in developing and carrying out action plans for the social, economic,
and environmental betterment of their communities. The goal of the Region 1 Urban Environmental
Initiative Community Grant project is to restore, maintain and enhance the ecological integrity and
social viability of the South Branch of the Park River
Watershed, in the  Behind the Rock  neighborhood.
This  revitalization project  will  improve  the
environment of the Behind the Rock neighborhood
by converting an overgrown dumping area into an
open space for public use by removal of trash and
undesirable species. The park will  be landscaped
with benches and flower pots.  The area will be -
converted into a public park with the installation of ss
walking trails and bikeways for the community.

Public Health Burdens in Chelsea, Massachusetts.
Region 1's Urban Environmental Initiative (UEI) has worked with community partners to address
the disproportionate environment and public health burdens in the cities of Chelsea and East Boston,
MA. There are 21  towns within the 120 square mile Mystic  River Watershed which is home to the
Chelsea River and Mill Creek.  The Chelsea River is home to 50% of the New England petroleum
fuel needs and 100% of Logan Airport's fuel needs.  173,061,000 gallons of fuel are transported
through the Chelsea River Bridge each month. On June 8,2000 the largest oil spill in Boston history

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.14

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
occurred in the Chelsea River - a total of 58,000 gallons of #6 fuel oil were dumped into the river
due to a tug boat collision with the 591 foot long oil tanker Posavina. Member organizations of the
Chelsea Creek Action Group applied jointly to EPA for funding in January 1998 to undertake a
comparative risk assessment.
       When this project was first proposed and presentations were made to the community, there
was very little interest.  The scope and magnitude of the project, like the environmental issues
themselves, had overwhelmed and demoralized community residents.  Outreach and support from
the UEI helped unite the community and empower organizations to apply and secure funding to
initiate a two year process to  conduct a first-of-its-kind community-based comparative risk
assessment to identify and evaluate targeted environmental, social, and public health issues affecting
local residents in Chelsea and East Boston.
       UEI also worked  with community partners to organize and mobilize a movement of youth
and citizens in the cities of Revere and Chelsea who are committed to the development of wetland
conservation, education, and collaborative programming to address wetland  restoration and
preservation in the areas of the Rumney Marsh in Revere, and the Mill Creek in Chelsea.  Utilizing
the energy and enthusiasm of 10 full-time Youth STAR members, between the ages of 16 and 24,
work is being done to develop wetland education workshops and community forums to target the
greater populations of Chelsea  and Revere, create and provide wetland activities and education
projects for elementary and middle school age children from both cities, and design and implement
outreach campaigns targeting wetland perimeter households.
Significant,  Sustained  Enforcement  and  Compliance  Assistance  Presence  in   the
Woonasquatucket River area of Providence, Rhode Island.  In 1998 and  1999, Region I
undertook an intensive enforcement sweep of potential pollution sources to the Woonasquatucket
River, and initiated an ambitious pollution prevention assistance effort targeted to auto body shops,
auto repair facilities and junkyards along and near the river. Following up on information gathered
by Region 1's Urban Enforcement Team, the Region conducted inspections at various types of
manufacturing facilities in the Woonasquatucket River watershed, which includes the towns of
Smithfield, Johnston, North Providence, North Smithfield and Providence. The inspections focused
on underground storage tanks, wastewater discharges, hazardous waste storage and handling, and
various other environmental compliance issues.
       Region 1 also boosted its pollution prevention and technical assistance efforts in the  area.
The region's technical assistance team visited three-dozen auto body and auto repairs facilities to
offer technical  assistance on various  environmental issues,  including storm  drain practices,
hazardous waste storage and handling procedures and air emission requirements  concerning auto
body work. The region also  conducted a cooperative effort with the Rhode Island Department of
Environmental Management to inform dozens of junkyard owners in the watershed about regulatory
requirements for developing and implementing stormwater management plans.

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.15

-------
                                  	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
Region 8

Health Concerns  in  North  Denver, Colorado.   The North  Denver environmental justice
community has multiple problems and Region 8 has begun several projects, in coordination with
other organizations, to begin to solve these problems.  The Vasquez Blvd./I 70 Superfund project
and related health studies are addressing health concerns and health risks from elevated arsenic and
lead levels in North Denver residents' yards and gardens, through removals of contaminated soils
in residential areas.  The North Denver Environmental Initiative is addressing North Denver
residents' non-Vasquez Blvd./I-70 Superfund health concerns, such as asthma, respiratory problems,
increased  cancer risk, through increased enforcement,  compliance assistance,  and pollution
prevention activities. The Northeast Metro Pollution Prevention Alliance is also addressing North
Denver residents' non-Superfund health concerns, through increased pollution prevention activities
for industries such as trucking  facilities and automotive repair shops.
                     Children's Health Problems and Solutions

Region 4

Region 4 Child Health Champion (CHC) Campaign Pilot. The CHC Campaign is a program
initiated by EPA's Office of Children's  Health  Protection to empower local citizens and
communities to take steps toward protecting their  children from environmental  health threats.
Region 4  selected Prichard, Alabama, an environmental justice area, for this  campaign.  A
community team, representing health care, education, local government, and business has developed
and is implementing an action plan to address two environmental health hazards of greatest concern
to their community; childhood asthma and lead poisoning.  The community team has developed
partnerships with  an elementary school to gather absenteeism statistics due to asthma and to
implement several education and outreach programs.  The community team has  established an
information hotline and repository and has conducted several education and outreach activities. As
a result of the screening programs that are being conducted, children with elevated blood lead levels
have been identified.  The community team is  also implementing EPA's "Tools for Schools"
program in both the public and private schools with special emphasis  on reducing children's
exposure to asthma triggers and pesticides.

Children's Pesticide, Asbestos  and  Lead  (PAL)  Environmental Health  Education and
Outreach Initiative.  The PAL Initiative is a community-based program designed to minimize
children's exposures to environmental health hazards which include lead-based  paint, pesticides,
secondhand smoke, radon, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and asbestos.  In collaboration with

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.16

-------
                                  	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
community organizations, Region 4's Pesticides and Toxic Substances Branch has conducted the
Children's PAL Initiative in Baldwin County, Georgia and is now implementing this Initiative in
Birmingham, Alabama, a community which has significant concerns with children's environmental
hazards.  The inner city area of Birmingham, Alabama is an environmental justice area with high
percentages of housing with lead-based paint, asbestos, and significant Toxic Release Inventory
(TRI) emissions in the area.
       The program includes development and implementation of community specific educational
programs for parents,  children, educators, and decision-makers.  Opportunities will be explored to
implement interventions that will address several children's health issues and address the needs and
interests of the  community (i.e., childhood lead poisoning, asthma, pesticide poisoning).  The
program will utilize resources in the community and government to help empower families and
neighborhoods to take better care of their children's environment. This project will also incorporate
many ongoing Agency voluntary initiatives including the Tools for Schools Program, Integrated Pest
Management in Schools, and other programs (i.e. asbestos, PCB's, asthma, radon) which address
children's environmental health hazards. Information on the process to develop this community-
based education and  outreach project has been presented at national clinical and public health
conferences.

Children's Health Issues in Anniston, Alabama. Region 4's Children's Environmental Health
Program has provided education and outreach material for the community in Anniston, Alabama
impacted by the superfund site and other sources.   The Region is planning to coordinate with the
Pediatric Environmental Health Speciality Unit (PEHSU) to provide education to physicians in
Anniston, Alabama.

Pediatric Environmental Health Speciality Unit (PEHSU). Region 4 and the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease  Registry (ATSDR) have established a Pediatric Environmental Health
Speciality Unit (PEHSU) at Emory University. The PEHSU will provide medical education, expert
consultation, and training to evaluate the potential adverse health impacts to young children exposed
to environmental contaminants. The PEHSU will serve as aregional resource for pediatricians, other
health care providers, parents, teachers, the public, and the Region 4 and ATSDR staff. The PEHSU
will  also focus  on pediatric environmental medicine as well as clinical specialty referrals for
children.

Region 6

Healthy  Kids,  Healthy Communities Project,  Albuquerque, New Mexico.  A  Region 6
community-based children's health project is being piloted in the community  of Sawmill, a
predominately Hispanic neighborhood, located in Albuquerque, New Mexico.  The neighborhood
is part of an area that has been identified as the "pocket of poverty" of Albuquerque.  Hispanics

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.17

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
comprise approximately 77% of the population in this community.  Sawmill also has a higher than
average percentage of elderly, when compared with the rest of the city. The project centers around
training residents of the community to perform indoor environmental assessments of homes, home-
based day care, and schools.  Indoor environmental risks that children are exposed to are identified,
and recommendations are made for risk reduction. All environmental media are included; however,
the project centers on issues that are within the control of the care-giver. Environmental risks to be
evaluated include lead-based paint,  radon, environmental tobacco smoke, pesticides, hazardous
household chemicals, and asthma triggers.  The American Lung Association of New Mexico is
administering the project, with guidance from a community coalition that includes the City of
Albuquerque Environmental Health Department, and other local agencies and non-profit groups
concerned with children health.

Region 7

New Madrid County Tri-Community Health Campaign. In a partnership with Region 7 and the
U.S. Department of Agriculture, the New Madrid County Tri-Community Child Health Champion
Campaign was developed to increase efforts to identify, mobilize, and make use of Federal resources
to benefit environmentally and economically distressed communities. The major focus of the project
has centered around improving the health of the children in the communities.  Lead poisoning,
asthma/allergies, and water quality are specific areas of concern to children's health. Region 7 is
facilitating efforts to help coordinate others joining this partnership to provide assistance to  the
communities of New Madrid.

Region 9
Childhood Champion Pilots - Asthma. Region 9 has two pilot projects, one in Los Angeles and
the second in Nogales, Arizona. Both projects are focusing on asthma and the use of education and
outreach tools that can help children and parents understand the disease, and the actions they can take
to address asthma. The Los Angeles proj ect involves a cooperative effort between Mothers' s of East
Los Angeles (a local community group), the American Lung Association (a national NGO) and the
City of LA. The Nogales project pays for promotoras, locally known,  Spanish-speaking, home
health care workers, to visit the homes of families with asthmatic children and help reduce exposure
to asthmagens.

Pesticides in Schools, California.  Region 9 has  awarded a $30,500 grant to the Pajaro Valley
Unified School District to assist them in reducing  the use of chemicals  for pest management on
school grounds. The District is a predominately Latino farmworker community. This District has
assembled  a committee of parents, teachers, and district staff to work with Region 9 to find
alternative methods for  controlling indoor and outdoor pests at all school sites.

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.18

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
National Lead-Safe Kids Coalition Project. Through a cooperative agreement with the National
Lead-Safe Kids Coalition, the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics' (OPPT) National Program
Chemical Division supported the national distribution of the EPA publication Lead In Your Home:
A Parent's Reference  Guide (the Parent's Guide) through retail grocery stores in targeted
communities. The National Lead-Safe Kids Coalition has also worked with dairies to place a lead
awareness message on milk cartons at stores across the country.  The message emphasizes the
importance of calcium as an inhibitor of lead absorption in the body.
Lead Poisoning Prevention. The Region 9 Lead Program works closely with the California state
and county lead programs and the state lead programs in Arizona and Hawaii. Lead hazard materials
are made available for lead screening, home visits, and community programs and fairs. Last year
Region 9 worked with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Women, Infants and Children Program
(WIC) to provide 18,000 copies of lead materials for distribution to WIC clients. The lead program
also worked with Head Start, providing materials to 94 Head Start centers in Los Angeles County
and 83 in Sacramento County. Region 9 plans on expanding this approach to other California
counties in the future.

Expanding Adoption  of Indoor  Air Quality (IAQ) Tools for Schools.  Region 9 Indoor
Environments Team has an ambitious program to encourage schools to adopt the IAQ Tools for
Schools program. The Team has trained more than 800 school district personnel and is now focusing
on individual pilot schools within selected districts, and  assisting the schools through initial
implementation. Partners include state agencies, educational organizations, and the American Lung
Association, which has created a model pilot "Mentor" program with the American Industrial
Hygiene Association. The focus in 1999 was on four implementing districts: San Francisco, Oakland,
Saugus Union, and Beverly Hills.
Urban Particulate Matter and Ozone Air Monitoring Proj ect.  Childhood asthma is dramatically
increasing in urban areas and is a leading cause of school absences and hospital admissions for
children. Castlemont High School in Oakland, California is one of two schools receiving an EPA
Environmental Monitoring Public  Access and Community Tracking  (BMPACT) grant for the
installation of particulate and ozone monitors and a weather station. The  project focuses on
empowering kids of color who normally would not have the opportunity to learn about particulate
and ozone levels and the associated monitoring equipment.  Data from the monitors will be
available to  the public  via a Web site.  The project will provide the students with hands-on
experiences and the community will have access to information about air quality.

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.19

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                    Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
Pesticides at the U.S./Mexico Border. Region 9 is participating on the San Diego Advisory
Committee for the California Department of Health Services (CHDS) outreach project on their report
on "Pesticide Use in California" which analysed pesticide use levels around schools in Imperial and
San Diego Counties.  In 1998, EPA Headquarters contracted with CDHS to participate in Phase 1
of a three phase EPA research effort on pesticides' health affects on children at the Mexico Border,
with Phase 1 focused on collecting information about pesticide use along the whole US Mexico
Border. CDHS is planning an outreach effort to educate the public about their report, and has
established advisory committees in both Imperial and San Diego counties to formulate the outreach
strategy. The group is proposing outreach to land use planners and city officials to encourage them
to use this information in land use planning decisions, particularly in the siting of schools and day
care centers.

Asthma Training for Border Schools. The American Lung Association of San Diego and Imperial
counties received an EPA grant to conduct asthma education for children along the U.S. Mexico
border.  Asthma hospitalization rates for children living in Imperial County,  California and in
Mexicali, Mexico are two to three times higher than those for California as a whole. Pesticide
exposure, unhealthful levels of ozone and particulate air pollution, and poor asthma control may be
contributing to these higher rates.  Under this grant, Open Airways for Schools training will be held
in fifteen low income schools in San Diego and Imperial Counties. The grant will also build capacity
for similar programs in Mexicali.

Children's Environmental Health Network (CEHN). Region 9 awarded a grant to CEHN to
expand and revise their web site focused on children's health issues. The site introduces and guides
newcomers to children's health issues and helps organizations incorporate children's environmental
health  concerns into  their ongoing activities.  It  includes pointers to 222 other organizations.
Currently  the site is  visited by 30,000  users  each month.   The  web  site  address  is:
http://www.cehn.org
Region 10

Children's Health Protection Workshop, Washington. A Children's Health Protection workshop
was held on January 18, 2000 at the Region 10 EPA office. The workshop's goals were to inform,
network, brainstorm, and link the resources of Region 10, the University of Washington (UW), and
other children's health representatives. Discussions focused on the UW Institute for Risk Analysis
and Risk Communication's activities, Fred Hutchinson  Cancer Research Center's  community
intervention project, Yakima Valley asthma monitoring, lead poisoning programs, the Urban

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          2.20

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
Pesticide Initiative, and the Infant Mortality Project - Shoal water Tribe, Washington. The Office
of Civil Rights and Environmental Justice highlighted the grantee's work addressing children's
health protection, including projects related to asthma, lead poisoning, and contaminated drinking
water.
                                     State Efforts

Oregon Environmental Justice Initiative. Region 10's Oregon Operations Office, Office for Civil
Rights and Environmental Justice, Office of Enforcement and Compliance, and Office of Waste and
Chemical Management, along with the US Attorney's Office for the District of Oregon partnered to
sponsor an environmental justice initiative in Oregon. The Oregon Environmental Justice Initiative
is a three year project (2000-2003) designed to identify and mobilize federal resources to benefit
environmental justice communities in Oregon.  A major focus of this project is to improve public
health through outreach, education, and enforcement. Federal, tribal, state, and local government
partners will work with community  groups to accomplish three community identified needs in
Oregon: (1) reduce lead exposure in urban areas, (2) reduce pesticide exposure in rural areas, and
(3) support tribal efforts to reduce illegal dumping on tribal lands. It is hoped that this approach to
environmental problem solving, using the tools of enforcement and community-based research and
education, will be implemented in other regions. The Initiative's goals for 2001 are: (1) develop
one significant judicial lead enforcement case, (2) develop one significant judicial pesticides
enforcement case, and (3) develop one significant dumping case in Indian country.
Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. Vermont received a $100,000 grant from
EPA to  achieve both compliance with environmental standards  and remediation of adverse
environmental conditions at mobile home parks while meeting the affordable housing needs of
thousands of low-income Vermonters.  The two  specific goals of the project are:  (1) Obtain
compliance and reduce or prevent disproportionate adverse environmental and health effects on
mobile home park residents, and (2) Develop enabling infrastructure at the state and local level with
technical and legal resources available to assist mobile home park residents. This project seeks to
address the unique environmental and public health concerns which impact mobile home park
residence.  Five state agencies  have formed a mobile home park compliance group  to share
information, expertise, and authority to develop and implement solutions for mobile home park
problems that previously seemed unsolvable from an individual agency perspective.  The greatest
need remains to be the implementation of technically practicable, as well as cost-effective, solutions
to sewage disposal problems and water supply problems which plague many mobile home parks.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.21

-------
                                  	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.   The New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection (DEP) developed the New Jersey Environmental Equity Community
Partnership Program,  through  a  $100,000 grant  from EPA, to  establish  and incorporate an
"Environmental Justice Screening Process" for evaluating environmental justice issues of affected
communities with respect to Air, Water, and/or Federal Hazardous Waste facility permits.  Based
upon the results from the environmental justice Screening Process, the DEP is working to establish
an Environmental Equity Community Partnership (EECP) Program in those minority and/or low-
income communities that may be experiencing a cumulative environmental burden. The State also
created an  "Environmental  Equity" Policy  which  is  available  on  their  web  site  at:
www.state.nj .us/dep/equity/

Tennessee Environmental Policy Office. Tennessee developed an environmental justice strategic
plan, with a $100,000 grant awarded by EPA. The State created its strategic plan, with significant
community involvement,  that is to guide all environmental justice activities of the Tennessee
Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) and serve as a state and national model. The
State is addressing  environmental justice through three major components: (1) Achieving an
integrated system of meaningful community involvement and participation through networks, such
as Tennessee' regional  Minority  Health Coalitions and  other organizations, (2) Integrating
environmental justice strategies with a major ongoing initiative to re-engineer the Department's
environmental regulatory programs, and (3) Developing and strengthening partnerships with other
state and federal agencies. The State's Environmental Justice Strategic Plan can be found at the
following web address: www.state.tn.us/environment/epo/ei7index.
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. The Texas Natural Resource Commission
(TNRCC) is working to enhance its effectiveness in complying with Title VI of the 1964 Civil
Rights Act, with assistance from a $ 100,000 grant from EPA. This effort is being made through the
creation and guidance of a stakeholder advisory panel. The State developed the project goals with
input from various communities that have filed Title VI complaints against the TNRCC or which
have raised issues of environmental justice with the agency in order to determine the best course of
action to reduce the possibility for future complaints. The advisory panel, made up of the partnering
community representatives from Beaumont, Corpus Christi, Houston, and Wichita Falls—along with
the TNRCC Chairman or his appointee,  Public  Interest Counsel,  Office of Legal Services--
Supplemental Environmental Projects, and a representative from a regional field office, are helping
develop model  programs to be piloted in their respective areas to address enforcement and
compliance concerns.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.22

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
State of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection.  Connecticut is developing a
"Model Multi-Cultural Public Participation Plan," through the assistance of a $100,000 grant from
EPA.  The state  created and is working with  a review team, comprised  of state agency
representatives and to include community-based grantee organizations, once they are  selected
through a competitive process.  CTDEP is conducting training workshops with local zoning and
planning  officials, CTDEP staff, and the review team to:  (1) familiarize the community-based
organizations about the existing siting, public notification, and public participation procedures, and
(2) engage  in facilitated discussions of specific notification and informational needs within their
communities. Through the review team's analysis of the state's existing public notification and
participation process, the state will develop recommendations on how to implement a program to
increase public notice and participation among low-income and minority communities. The result
will be a model statewide public participation plan designed to improve public participation and to
prevent discriminatory effects from Connecticut's permitting and other regulatory processes.  The
Connecticut model will be made  available for distribution to other communities throughout the
country.

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). New York is working
to develop an Environmental Justice policy, with support from a $100,000 EPA grant. NYSDEC
has:  (1) formed a multi-stakeholder Environmental Justice Advisory Group  that reports to the
Commissioner,  (2) is developing  an environmental justice permit policy that would articulate
guidelines for addressing environmental justice issues which arise in permitting, (3) has enhanced
the Department's Web site which enables the state to provide better and more timely information to
the public, such as receipt of permit applications, among other things, (4) are conducting a series of
legislative hearings throughout the state (to identify environmental justice concerns, to enhance
public participation in development and implementation  of the  state's environmental justice
program, encourage communities in planning for environmental and economic enhancement, and
integrate  environmental justice concerns into local land use planning, and related state and local
activities);  and (5) are seeking recommendations,  from the Advisory  Group,  for a  strategic
environmental justice plan for the Department and the State of New York. Information on the state's
environmental justice program can be found at the following web address:
 www.dec.state.ny .us/website/ej/index.html

Indiana Department of  Environmental Management (IDEM).  Through the assistance of a
$100,000 grant from EPA,  the  state is working  directly, and  in partnership, with Indiana
communities to develop an environmental justice strategy to integrate environmental justice goals
into the Department's policies, programs and activities.  The program is based on the following
principles: (1) awareness & sensitivity, (2) public participation, (3) inclusiveness, (4) pro-activity,
and (5) sustainability. Through this project, IDEM is doing the following: (1) Supporting a diverse
Environmental Justice Advisory Committee which is developing the Environmental Justice Strategic

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.23

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
Plan, (2) Mapping concentrations of low income/minority populations and environmental impacts,
(3) Educating communities about environmental issues  and how they can  get involved, (4)
Developing a training program to train IDEM staff on environmental justice issues and how they can
be more responsive to environmental justice concerns,  (5) Determining how to  include the
implementation of the Strategic Plan into the Performance Partnership Agreement, (6) Establishing
a single point of contact within IDEM to respond to environmental justice concerns, (7) Developing
a protocol for facilitation of environmental disputes so that disputes can be resolved prior to decision
making, (8) Evaluating, with community input, existing IDEM decision making processes regarding
rule making & permitting, enhancing public participation opportunities, and the way in which IDEM
communicates with the public,  (9) Preparing a written commitment by IDEM to implement the
strategy, including a time-line for implementation, and 10) Evaluating whether the strategy is being
implemented within IDEM and how well it is being implemented.

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The state is developing a strategic framework to
incorporate environmental justice into its programs, which is being supported by an EPA grant of
$100,000.   The  state is  working directly with  communities to improve consideration  of
environmental justice concerns and compliance with Title VI in the state's environmental programs.
Specifically, MPCA is: (1) Working with an advisory task force, consisting of representatives from
multiple organizations representing minority communities where most environmental injustices are
found, (2) Developing and disseminating environmental, geographic  and demographic data  to
support outreach efforts and environmental program implementation, and (3) Developing a plan to
integrate environmental justice considerations into MPCA's decision-making and communication
strategies. MPCA is also committed to initiating a network of other state agencies to collaborate and
address environmental justice issues.

                                    Tribal  Efforts

Kalispel Tribe of Indians.  The Kalispel Tribe obtained a grant of $100,000 to develop and
implement an ISO 14001 conforming Environmental Management System (EMS) that integrates
environmental justice goals with environmental performance objectives for the Kalispel reservation.
The Kalispel Tribe developed the proposal with the support and advice of grassroots organizations,
the Director of the Washington Department of Ecology and his staff, Pend Oreille County, and the
Coeur D'Alene,  Colville  and Spokane Tribes.   The ISO  14001  standard,  establishes an
internationally accepted framework for EMSs which can serve as a sustainable program that: (1)
allows meaningful involvement of all members of the tribe in the development of goals for an
environmental program, (2) prevents impacts from being disproportionately borne by subgroups
within the tribe, (3) goes above and beyond compliance  with environmental laws, (4) reduces
pollution and pro-actively prevents pollution, and (5) ensures fair treatment.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.24

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
Maniilaq Association.  The Maniilaq Association, a consortium of 11 Tribes of Northwest Arctic
Region,  received a  $100,000 grant from  EPA to identify,  investigate, and  document  the
environmental burdens placed on the Native people of the Alaska region.  In addition, through the
education of regional village representatives on how environmental justice issues are relevant to
tribal concerns, this serves to evaluate the environmental injustices experienced by the native people
of the Northwest Arctic over the last few decades, and to inform tribes on the importance of
implementing environmental justice in tribal activities. An environmental justice guide is being
developed and shared with the tribes of the Association. The document will serve as a tool to be
used by tribes for evaluating environmental violations and as an environmental justice outreach and
education tool. The guide will also be available to private, state and federal agencies as a reference
to examine their compliance with environmental mandates.
                      Federal Facilities Problems and Solutions
Region 6

Contamination at Kelly Air Force Base. Kelly Air Force Base (KAFB) has been targeted for
realignment and closure beginning in 2001.  The KAFB soil contaminants include solvents, metals,
petroleum, paint products and various other products used for aircraft maintenance and repair.
Contaminants in shallow groundwater beneath KAFB and off-base include metals, solvents, and fuel
constituents. A large chlorinated solvent plume has been identified offsite of the east  KAFB
boundary. Delineation efforts indicate the plume extends at least three miles to the east and two
miles southeast. Region 6 has worked with the Kelly Gardens community to address environmental
justice concerns. The agency has participated in site tours of communities adjoining KAFB and
other San Antonio areas as  well.  Community-based organization representatives lead by the
Southwest Public Workers Union, PODER and the Southwest Network have met with EPA and
Texas Natural Resources Conservation commission on numerous occasions to discuss concerns and
possible actions to address those concerns. ATSDR was petitioned by the late Congressman Frank
Tejeda to perform a health assessment of the neighborhoods north and southeast of KAFB. ATSDR
prepared a Public Health Assessment (PHA) - Phase I of KAFB and the surrounding community
which was released on August 24, 1999. This report indicated that the community is not currently
exposed to levels of contamination from KAFB that would cause citizens to become ill; however,
the community may have been exposed to higher levels in the past. Since April 2000, the Air Force
has been hosting public forums to discuss shallow groundwater contamination due to past activities.
Currently 60-70 foram have been held for various community groups as well as interested businesses
and political groups, additional forums are anticipated.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.25

-------
	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems


          Using Supplemental Environmental Projects to Address Problems

Region 5

Supplemental Environmental Projects in the Greater Chicago Area. Representatives of Illinois
EPA and U.S. EPA hosted a meeting with approximately 20 representatives of environmental groups
to discuss supplemental environmental projects (SEPs), and the development of a SEP bank related
to enforcement cases in the Greater Chicago area. Citizens for a Better Environment coordinated
outreach to environmental groups, and encouraged attendance. After providing some background
information regarding SEPs, including  the federal SEP policy, and responding to questions, the
group brainstormed on developing SEP projects.  The agencies committed to circulating a list of
project ideas for development by environmental groups.  The meeting was well received by the
groups in attendance. A similar meeting is planned for municipal representatives.


           Alternative Dispute Resolutions  - A Tool for Finding Solutions

       The Office of Environmental Justice (OEJ) initiated a pilot program to provide low or no-
cost access to dispute resolution professionals to stakeholders involved in  conflicts involving
environmental justice issues.  Through this program, OEJ hopes to understand better the value and
appropriate use of dispute resolution techniques (e.g. mediation, facilitated dialogue, etc.) to
environmental justice disputes. In addition, OEJ hopes to help parties bring specific conflicts to and
equitable and just conclusion.
       Environmental justice issues frequently demand complex decisions on equity, social and
economic  revitalization,  health, and maintenance or improvement of a clean, safe environment.
Frequently, these disputes  are  made  even more  complex by lack  of information,  lack of
understanding of stakeholder concerns, lack of trust among parties, and frequently a longstanding
history of uneasy relationships. Dispute resolution techniques have helped resolve disputes having
these attributes in other contexts, and they hold promise for environmental justice disputes, as well.

       However, before dispute resolution techniques are used widely it will be important to
understand better how to address:  cross-cultural differences; ability of a single or small number of
individuals to "speak for a community;" and severe differences in power among parties.  Through
attention to these issues, OEJ seeks to create a record of experience that will help parties better
understand how non-adversarial techniques can be used in an appropriate and effective manner.
       Thus far, the pilot program has provided assistance to the implementation of a Superfund
Administrative Order on Consent in Alabama, and in the implementation of measures to address air
quality and land use concerns in the community of Barrio  Logan in  San Diego, California.  OEJ
welcomes written requests for assistance.

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.26

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
   Solid and Hazardous Waste Problems and Solutions and Brownfields Cleanup

Social Aspects of Siting RCRA Hazardous Waste Facilities - Booklet.  This booklet was
developed for industry and state and local government's use to heighten their awareness of quality
of life concerns faced by communities who live near RCRA hazardous waste management facilities.
The  document  offers examples  of quality of life concerns raised by environmental justice
communities  when  facilities are sited.  The document also shares  experiences and  creative
mechanisms that have been developed in order to work effectively with communities, as well as
encourages businesses  and government  agencies  to address  community concerns  early,
collaboratively and compassionately.  In developing this document, the Office of Solid Waste held
a one-day stakeholder forum "RCRA Subtitle C Waste Facility Social Siting Criteria Stakeholders'
Roundtable" to get feedback from various groups (environmental and community, state agencies,
industry and national organizations) to obtain relevant and accurate information on the draft
booklet's contents. The booklet was then revised and publicized in April, 2000. The booklet can
be found on the web at the following address:
www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/tsds/site/k00005.pdf

Region 3

Abex Superfund Site, Virginia.  The Abex Corporation Superfund site  is located in the eastern
section of Portsmouth, Virginia, and centers around a two-acre property containing a former brass
and bronze foundry.  The primary  contaminant of concern is lead, however, other contaminants are
present as well.  The site includes the former foundry as well as adjacent contaminated soils. The
largest residential area impacted is a portion of the Washington Park Public Housing Project which
is home to approximately 160 predominately African American families. In January, 1999, EPA and
Abex began the temporary residential relocation of the first group of Washington Park residents for
the remedial action at the site (residents were previously relocated for the purpose of removing soil
contamination "hot spots").   These relocations have since been completed.  Also, the temporary
residential relocations for heating duct cleaning in the Washington Park Housing Development were
completed in February 2000. The air ducts were cleaned in 160 residential units where unacceptable
concentrations of lead were detected.  Soil removal in the adjacent private neighborhood is also
progressing. The results of blood analysis, from samples taken from a number of Washington Park
residents, did not detect lead above the health based concentration.
       The site is one of the more complex sites in the region.  Concerns about elevated blood lead
levels in children lead Region 3 to bring in both  the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) to provide information, consultation,
and support regarding lead poisoning and other public health issues. ATSDR and CDC participated

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          2.27

-------
                                  	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
with the EPA in a series of public meetings and information sessions held for the residents. These
agencies reviewed and assessed blood lead test results which were collected and analyzed by the
Commonwealth of Virginia.  The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) was
brought into the case by EPA,  first because of questions regarding  permanent relocation of
Washington Park residents, then because of temporary housing  issues, and finally because of
renewed concern for permanent relocation. HUD has now assumed the lead on the relocation issue.
The Army Corps of Engineers (COE) assisted EPA with the temporary relocation of residents during
the remedial cleanup of the  site, including finding lodging for the residents during their temporary
relocation.  The Department of Justice has provided significant legal assistance during the hearing
process. The complex nature of this site makes it clear that the engagement of all the federal partners
is vital in addressing issues EPA has neither the expertise nor legal authority which to address.
Fuel Contamination at Passyunk Homes Housing Project, Philadelphia. The Passyunk Homes
Housing Project was a low-income housing project located in South Philadelphia. The property is
owned by the Philadelphia Housing Authority (PHA).  Approximately one million gallons of
petroleum sits on top of the groundwater at this property, attributed to the use of the area by Sun Oil
Company and the Defense Supply Center Philadelphia (DSCP).  DSCP is a federal facility which
is operated by the Defense Logistics Agency.  The oil plume was caused by past industrial practices
in the area. Sun Oil Company, DSCP and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
(PADEP) signed an Agreement in 1997 whereby DSCP and Sun Oil would jointly remediate the oil
plume beneath South Philadelphia. The Agreement between DSCP, Sun Oil and PADEP expired
on August 1,1999, however, the removal of the oil from the groundwater continues under a PADEP
Order issued to DSCP, the U.S. Army, and the Defense Logistics Agency. The military has appealed
the PADEP Order. PHA and HUD were concerned about petroleum vapors and any potential health
affects on the Passyunk Home residents, and the fact that the agreement had expired during the
summer of 1999. PHA had a stake in the oil recovery proj ect because of the potential health affects
on the residents and the fact that the hydrocarbon recovery system is located on PHA property.
       Region 3 worked with PHA and HUD to ensure that the environmental justice concerns of
the residents were addressed.  Region 3 wanted to ensure that the oil recovery project did not
intensify  environmental stressors on the residents.  During the summer of 2000, PHA and HUD
completed the closure of the homes and  the relocation of all the residents.

Region 4

IMC and Arkwright Landfill Superfund  Sites, South Carolina.  Spartensburg, SC has two
adjacent  Superfund  sites which  after   being neglected for years,  underwent  EPA-lead site
assessments in 1999 and 2000. Environmental justice staff provided extensive supporting activities
to the  community and to the Agency's remediation program.  Specifically,   the Region's

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.28

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
environmental justice staff: (1) interviewed former workers on disposal areas and operations; (2)
exchanged information with  the community; (3) assisted the community in developing its
Environmental Justice Small Grant Work Plan; (4) attended internal strategy meetings with the site
team; (5) held numerous conference calls and meetings/presentation with Re-Genesis environmental
justice group representatives; (6) commented on technical documents (e.g. ATSDR documents); and
(7) continued to ensure public input in the remediation process involving two adjacent Superfund
sites. One of the sites may be selected for the Recycling Superfund Sites Initiative. A special local
"Superfund Process" training added value to the community knowledge.  Regional environmental
justice staff worked with Re-Genesis, the lead community organization, to create a "Responsive
Revitalization" forum, held with 60 diverse stakeholders (e.g. City, County, landowners, banks,
developers, and EPA). Subsequently, the community
was  chosen for a  Federal Interagency Environmental
Justice  Demonstration Pilot, called "Cleanup  and
Revitalization  through  Collaborative  Partnerships,
Arkwright and Forest Park Community."   The  first
meeting lead by the federal partners was held in August,
2000 and achieved a participation of 11 other partner
groups.

National   Relocation   Pilot,   Escambia  Wood
Preserving Superfund Site, Florida. The Escambia
Treating Company Superfund Site is part of a National
Relocation Pilot. To date, EPA has relocated over 90%
of single family housing residents.  EPA has reimbursed
homeowners for the fair market value of their homes plus a differential to help them buy a new home
of their choice. Additionally, EPA has provided moving expense payments to  everyone. As for the
Escambia Arms Apartments (a government subsidized apartment complex with 200  two and three
bedroom units), EPA has provided relocation assistance to about 40%  of the  residents, as
negotiations continue with the owner of the complex.

EPA's relocation assistance has taken the form of down-payment assistance for several  residents who
elected to  move away from the complex on their own, and were found to be eligible  for relocation
assistance under provisions of the Uniform Relocation Act.  A public meeting was held on August
29, 2000 with residents of the Escambia Arms Apartments.  The meeting was hosted by the Army
Corps of Engineers, EPA and the Pensacola Housing Authority.  Agencies discussed the progress
of the acquisition of the apartments and the government's plans to commence with the relocation of
the remaining residents. The agencies updated residents on the relocation assistance program being
offered. Regarding the actual cleanup of the Superfund site, to ensure that whatever remedial options
proposed are consistent with the beneficial future redevelopment of the area (revitalization and reuse
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.29

-------
                                  	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
plans are currently being developed by the Escambia County Community Redevelopment Agency
through an EPA grant), EPA postponed issuing a proposed plan for the remedial action for Operable
Unit 1 (former facility, the residential neighborhood).

American Creosote Superfund Site, Mississippi.  The American Creosote Removal Action is
within a predominately low-income, minority community.  There was a removal action at the site
in the 1980s. A hazard ranking package was prepared to propose the site to the NPL.  However, the
site did not rank. In 1999, the Emergency Response and Removal Branch (ERRB) began a removal
action. As a result of intensive community involvement and valuable input from the community,
the site was easily ranked. The primary concern at the site is creosote.  Children from the nearby
housing project had played in a creosote contaminated pond on the site.  The ponds on the site had
also been used in the past by a church for baptism. Citizens have voiced concerns because creosote
is apparent in the creek that runs next to the site (no longer used for fishing or swimming). A door-
to-door campaign was launched to inform the community because the majority of the residents near
the site do not receive the local newspaper.  The residents are pleased that a superfund removal
action has taken place to clean up the site and that there will be a remedial action to clean up the
groundwater at the site.

Brownfields Pilot in Columbia, Mississippi. A community partnership between the City, local
activists and an environmental justice advocacy group (Jesus People Against Pollution) was formed
to implement the Brownfields Assessment Pilot Grant. The partnership created the forum to reunite
parties polarizedby the Superfund cleanup process which took place at the former Newsom Brothers
Site. The partners expanded to include the EPA, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry,
U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality,
Mississippi Department of Health, Corps  of Engineers,  Fannie Mae and the Partnership  of
Sustainable Brownfields Redevelopment.  A charrette (or visioning) workshop was hosted that
included  a professional planner/facilitator, the residential and business  community,  local civic
leaders, city personnel, HUD and EPA. A master plan for sustainable redevelopment is still under
an area where the income level of seventy percent of the residents is below poverty. The community
partners applied for "Brownfields Showcase" status for their rural community, in the  Spring, 2000.
They continue to heighten the need for continued funding.

Opa-Locka Brownfields Task Force, Florida. Region 4's South Florida Office is an active
member of the Opa-Locka Brownfields Task Force which has been functioning for approximately
three years.  Early efforts of the task force were to identify the many parcels  of abandoned  or
underutilized properties within this  low-income, predominantly Hispanic and black community.
Region 4 has provided targeted site assessments at nine of these parcels and one has received a Phase
2 detailed assessment of contamination which has enabled the city to pursue third party interest in
cleanup and redevelopment.   The city has  also successfully applied for, and been awarded, a

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.30

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                    Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
Brownfields Assessment Pilot which will allow them to continue their Brownfields efforts to restore
their city.  As part of their Brownfields efforts, Region 4 encouraged the city to establish a
community outreach subgroup which has had a number of meetings with the public surrounding
these sites to encourage input/participation from the pub lie on their concerns relating to the potential
contamination and their ideas on reuse.

Region 5

Superfund Jobs Training Initiative in Chicago, Illinois. The Superfund Jobs Training Initiative
completed another session in Region 5 at the Dutch Boy Landfill Site in Chicago, IL. This Initiative
was made possible through a grant program from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and
the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and was the result of collaboration
between the EPA, NIEHS, DePaul University, and a number of community training partners.
The  success of the program was based on the wisdom and foresight  of educators at  DePaul
University and EPA staff.  Through the partnerships and diligent efforts, twenty-eight students
received specialized training including: 40-hour HAZWOPER certification, Lead and Asbestos
Worker training, Superfund Regulatory Overview, Hazardous Site Cleanup Simulations,  Critical
Thinking and Employability Skills Development, and Life Skills Training (i.e. conflict resolution,
team building,  self esteem, job readiness, logical reasoning,  and environmental vocabulary
development). The  trainees will be licensed in the State of Illinois (and in Indiana by reciprocity)
as asbestos abatement  workers and lead abatement workers. This multiple licensing will enhance
each trainee's employability and work regularity.  The students trained in the Initiative were ethnic
minorities between  the ages of 18-25  years.  After training was completed, EPA and  DePaul
University hosted a job fair for trainees to provide an opportunity for the qualified community
residents to meet and interact with local contractors. This real-life simulated training prepared the
students not only for an opportunity to secure jobs in the environmental field, but also provided a
decided advantage to persevere in all aspects of their lives.

Region 6

Minority Worker Training Program. The National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences
(NIEHS), using EPA funding, has awarded funding to Xavier University in New Orleans, as a sub-
grantee of Clark Atlanta University, under two cooperative agreements to development and
implement two Minority Worker Training Program (MWTP) grants. Both projects have two main
goals:  (1) work in partnership with unions via apprenticeship programs, local community-based
organizations, and local academic institutions to implement a comprehensive education  and job
training program that will  address clean-up and redevelopment in the target areas, and (2) assist the
local community colleges and Historical Black Colleges and Universities in promoting worker health
and safety through education and training delivered by these academic institutions.

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          2.31

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
Final Closure and Completion of Post-Closure Plan for Pueblo of Taos Pueblo.  The Taos
Pueblo has completed closing a 5.4 acre dump utilizing EPA Region 6 Solid Waste Closure/Post
Closure Guidance (which is now being used by other Regions).  Coordination for the funding,
planning, and closing of the dump, technical assistance and review of all documents regarding the
final cover and post closure care plan was provided by the Solid Waste Section staff.  The
coordination effort of this dump was a very significant action because it sets a model for working
with several federal agencies and tribes to physically close a dump and have an alternative to open
dumping. The Pueblo of Taos Tribal Council has recently approved the construction of a community
transfer station as an alternative to operating a landfill.

Tribal Health Issues, Tar Creek Superfund Site, Oklahoma. The Tar Creek Superfund Site is
a former lead and zinc mining area of 40 square miles within the former Quapaw Indian Reservation
boundary. Approximately 25% of the children have elevated blood lead levels compared to  a
statewide average of 2%. Major efforts are underway to clean up the Site and protect the population
from lead exposures and mining waste. Approximately $50 million has been spent removing lead-
contaminated soil from 1500 residential  yards and 28 high access  areas (e.g., playgrounds,
schoolyards, parks, and other areas where children congregate), plugging 83 abandoned wells to
protect the drinking water supply, and constructing diversion diking to protect the surface water.
Another approximately $20 million requiring a state cost share is needed in the next year for
remediation of an additional 500 yards and for other remaining work to protect the populace from
exposure to lead-contaminated soil.
The Quapaw  Tribe powwow grounds and campgrounds were contaminated from mine tailings
(locally know as  chat)  used to  floor the camp shelters and to cover walkways  and roads.
Remediation, consisting of removal of the lead-contaminated soil from the  campground, was
conducted in late Winter and early Spring 2000.  Remediation was completed in the Spring. EPA
is funding ATSDR for an extensive lead education and blood-lead screening program at the Site.
These efforts include coordination with a health coalition, health care representatives and from local
communities and tribes.

Region 8

Arsenic and Lead Contamination in Denver, Colorado. Residential communities in the Vasquez
Boulevard/I-70 area are contaminated with arsenic and lead. The residential cleanup was added to
the Superfund National Priorities List in July 1999.  It is the largest current soil remediation in the
national Superfund program with more than 4000 homes, 20,000 residents, largely Hispanic and
African American communities. The northern neighborhoods sit in the most polluted zip code in
the Denver metropolitan area. There is active community participation through monthly meetings
with community representatives and other key stakeholders to review progress. A cleanup plan will

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.32

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                    Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
be completed by Fall 2001 and remediation of the soils will likely commence in the Summer of
2002. To address environmental justice concerns at this site, the Environmental Justice Program
conducted a day-long workshop on environmental justice for the VB-I70 Working Group.  The
Environmental Justice Program also participates in the majority of Superfund meetings.

Casper Corrective Action Management Unit, Wyoming.  An area adjacent to the Midwest
Heights neighborhood in Casper, Wyoming, was the location for oil refining operations from 1913
to 1991. As part of facility closure under a consent decree, BP Amoco proposed to locate a
corrective action management unit (CAMU) within 1000 feet of this low-income residential area.
The CAMU would serve as a landfill for wastes derived from facility clean up.  These wastes would
include hazardous wastes, among other types, such as construction debris.  The State of Wyoming
requested consultation from Region  8's  Environmental Justice Program.  The region provided a
number of consultation and guidance activities, including demographic and environmental justice
analyses, consultation with the state and Amoco directly regarding environmental justice and its
relationship to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, guidance on community participation in public
meetings and provision of an Environmental Justice Workshop for the community group involved
with the clean up effort at the former refinery location. As a result of these consultation activities
and community feedback, BP Amoco chose another location for the CAMU, which fit with overall
goals for corrective action at the site.

Region 9

Proposed Gregory Canyon Landfill, California. Gregory Canyon Limited proposes to construct
and operate a new municipal  solid waste landfill and recycling collection  center in San Diego
County. The landfill was sited based on  a San Diego County ballot measure. Previous to the
measure, the site had been reviewed twice, and was turned down based on environmental concerns.
The proposed landfill is located south of State Route 76 approximately three miles east of Interstate
15, near the San Luis Rey River in San Diego County, California.  California law requires that an
environmental impact report be prepared  to identify all  of the potential environmental  impacts
associated with construction and operation of a landfill at the Gregory Canyon site.  There is
considerable opposition to the project from the local community, including the Luiseno tribal
communities. The proposed landfill would negatively impact tribal sacred sites as well as potentially
degrade the last scenic river in southern California. The tribal communities have asked for Region
9 assistance in ensuring that the landfill is not detrimental to the environment. In addition, the Tribes
raised this proposed siting as an environmental justice concern. Region 9 is working with the Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps) to assist in consultation and coordination between the entities involved.
In order for the project to continue, the Corps will need to issue a Clean Water Act Wetlands permit
for a portion of the site.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          2.33

-------
                                  	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
                        International Problems and Solutions

African Chemicals Management Capacity Building Program. In partnership with U.S. Aid for
International Development (AID) and the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP), EPA
developed the African Chemicals Management Capacity Building Program. This program provides
chemicals information exchange in Africa to provide Internet access and training to chemicals
management decision-makers in Mali, Nigeria, Cote d'lvoire and Tanzania.

Region 9

Safety Kleen Hazardous Waste Facility- Westmoreland, California. In the second quarter of FY
1999, Region 9 was alerted by environmental justice advocates and organizations of a waste
shipment from Cambodia which may have been improperly characterized. The shipment of waste
to the Westmoreland, CA Safety Kleen hazardous waste facility (subject of a Title VI Complaint),
raised environmental justice concerns with respect to how the Agency handles international waste
issues. For several months, Region 9's Environmental Justice Program and Waste Division worked
closely with the State Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and the community to
address the environmental justice issues surrounding shipment of waste from Cambodia to a facility
in Westmoreland, CA.  Ultimately, the waste was not shipped to Westmoreland. A subsequent
community meeting was conducted by Region 9, DTSC, and Imperial County Planning and Health
Agencies, at the request of the Westmoreland residents. The meeting focused on public participation
in permitting process, international waste issues, and Title VI.
Phase out of Lead in Gasoline Project for Sub/Saharan Africa. The Office of International
Activities (OIA) is working with the Alliance to End Childhood Lead Poisoning, the World Bank
and other partners to encourage the phase out of lead in gasoline in Sub-Saharan Africa.  Gasoline
used in Africa has the highest content of lead of any in the world. Used in the aging vehicle fleets
common in the region, the health impacts, particularly on children and  street vendors, are severe.
EPA's partnership with the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) provides Internet access
to officials tasked with managing pesticides and other chemicals. OIA is piloting this effort in four
countries:  Mali, Nigeria, C'ote d'lvoire and Tanzania. While the pilots will improve information
capacity for the sound management of chemicals to government officials only, later stages of the
program will bring in many more African countries, a wide range of stakeholders, and will include
a public education component.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         2.34

-------
                                   	Chapter 2
                                   Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
                       Mexican Border Problems and Solutions

Training of Health Professionals Along the US/Mexico Border. As part of the effort to improve
the quality of health related environmental issues along the border, EPA entered into an Interagency
Agreement to support environmental health training and surveillance activities on the U.S.-Mexico
border.  Through training, lay community health workers (promotoras) and multi-disciplinary
primary care clinicians will learn to better recognize, understand, and manage illnesses related to
exposure to environmental health hazards.  This training will provide information on exposure to
toxic substances found in air, water, soil, as well as basic sanitation practices. The program will be
accomplished by developing a two-track training curriculum, one for promotoras, and one for multi-
disciplinary clinicians, which includes implementing  a variety of didactic and clinical training
activities.

Region 6

Texas and New Mexico Colonia Programs.  Beginning in FY 93 through FY 98,  Region 6
awarded $40.2 million to the New Mexico Environment Department and $315.3 million to the Texas
Water Development Board.  The funds were awarded to construct Colonia drinking water and
wastewater treatment facilities as well as provide low interest loans to colonia residents for installing
indoor plumbing. Public health and environmental problems have been created by the lack of safe
drinking water and sewer services of unincorporated communities located along the U.S./Mexico
Border. These small communities, referred to as "colonia," are often highly impoverished areas,
characterized by substandard housing and poor living conditions.  They often lack basic services,
including drinking water, sewer, drainage, electricity and paved roads. To date, approximately 444
colonia in Texas alone, have been assisted with these funds. A considerable number of colonia  are
now in the planning stages for infrastructure projects.
Texas and New Mexico Colonia Strike Force Grants. To date, Region 6 has provided more than
$450,000 in grant funds to the Texas and New Mexico Attorney General's offices which takes
action against unlawful development along the U.S ./Mexico Border where developers fail to provide
proper infrastructure for development which results in poor living conditions and potential health
hazards in the colonia. These funds are used to conduct investigations of this type of activity. The
strike force brings lawsuits against colonia developers under a variety of laws in order to protect the
public health of colonia residents. The colonia strike force also seeks monetary judgement against
developers to compensate local governments for the cost of providing infrastructure neglected by the
developers.

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          2.35

-------
                                  	Chapter 2
                                  Addressing Environmental Justice Problems
Support for Mexico Border Communities. To increase awareness of environmental justice outside
of the Agency, Region 9 has worked closely with communities in the Border Region (San Diego,
Tijuana, Ensenada, El Paso-Ciudad Juarez, Nogales, AZ, Douglas, AZ).  Region 9 continues to
conduct regular face-to-face meetings with various community groups, to discuss environmental
justice concerns. Grants have been awarded to two organizations working on environmental justice
issues in the Border Region. The Imperial  Valley College Project New River/New Hope is an
environmental education project, and the  Tucson, Arizona BorderLinks project Developing
Grassroots Leaders in Response to Cross Border Environmental Crisis focuses on the development
of women's leadership.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                        2.36

-------
                                   	Chapter 3
                                   Public Participation and Training Initiatives
     EPA-sponsored public participation and environmental justice training programs seek to
improve federal, state and local, and tribal governments, industry, and community stakeholders'
understanding of what and how the environmental laws are working to protect the environment and
public health of all communities in our nation. With this increased understanding, the various
stakeholders are better positioned to identify the opportunities for collaborative problem-solving to
address the environmental justice concerns.  EPA has witnessed the growth in the number of
stakeholders who recognize the benefits of, and, therefore, seek opportunities to work collaboratively
in the decision-making processes. The following is a discussion of some of the public participation
and environmental justice training initiatives which support this approach to problem- solving.
                            Public Participation Initiatives

Public Involvement In Environmental Permits: A Reference Guide. This document, completed
August 2000, was developed to provide a resource for state program staffs to enhance their public
participation efforts. However, it can also be used by the public as a resource to learn about how
they can engage themselves in the permitting process.  This reference guide summarizes the major
permitting programs under the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act, and the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. It also gives an overview of the core public involvement
requirements in the various permitting programs. Included in the reference guide are best practices
and a model plan for implementing effective public participation  activities under  the various
programs, a compendium of additional resources, and contacts for use in implementation. In drafting
the reference guide, the Agency consulted with key partners, including advisory groups, on early
drafts.  Stakeholder meetings were held in the District of Columbia and Houston, Texas to obtain
comments from  a variety of interests, such as, environmental  and  community groups,  state
associations, national associations, state and regional regulators, and industry.  The Guide can be
found at the following web address:  www.epa.gov/permits

The University-based Hazardous Substance Research Centers Program. The university-based
Hazardous Substance Research Centers Program has been supporting two (2) outreach and education
initiatives for several years.  The Technical Outreach Services for Communities  Program (TOSC)
began in 1995 and the Technical Assistance to Brownfields Program (TAB) formally began in 1998.
Funded jointly by the Office  of Research and Development (ORD) and the Superfund Office, these
ongoing programs provide independent, scientific information to many under-served, overburdened,
and low-income communities across the country through a network of over 25 colleges and
universities.  The goal  is to build the community's capacity to participate in environmental

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          3.1

-------
	Chapter 3
                                   Public Participation and Training Initiatives


decisionmaking.  For a listing of participating universities, communities, and educational modules,
please visit the following web address:  www.toscprogram.org

                      Environmental Justice Training Activities

EPA  Training Collaborative.  A new Environmental Justice Training Collaborative is being
organized. The Office of Environmental Justice (OEJ) has played a leadership role in founding and
funding the newly established Environmental Justice Training Collaborative. This organization
provides quality  environmental justice training, and consultative  assistance in development of
environmental justice related curriculum.   It also serves  a central networking  and  information
dissemination hub for states and tribes, EPA, other federal agencies, community groups, academics,
and increasingly industry. Thus far membership include all ten EPA regions, headquarters offices,
and eight states (including, California, New York, and New Hampshire), among others.

Region 4

Teacher Environmental Institute. Region 4 staff and universities under EPA grants coordinated
five  (5) Teachers  Environmental Institutes  to provide educators with  environmental  and
environmental justice  knowledge and skills.  About 230  educators were trained, and as a result,
potentially 180,000  students will be  affected.  Florida A & M University; North Carolina State
University- Medical University of South Carolina and Spelman College played a lead role over the
past two years.  Region 4 staff from cross-divisional programs participated as guest lecturers.
environmental justice  staff coordinated a site tour visit to the Anniston polychlorinated biphenyls
Superfund site for teachers in June 2000.

EPA/Shaw University Research Apprenticeship Program for Culturally Diverse High School
Students.  The  objective  of the EPA/Shaw University  Research Apprenticeship Program  for
Culturally Diverse  High  School  Students is  to  encourage students from culturally  diverse
backgrounds  to pursue advanced degrees in math, science, and engineering.  The program was
initiated in 1990 as a cooperative agreement. Students in the Research Apprenticeship Program must
live in Wake  County, NC and be in grades 9 through 12. There are currently 31 students in the
program, and eight rising 9th graders are accepted into the program annually. In the spring of 1999,
there  were 78 applicants for the eight positions.  The students must maintain high academic
performance in high school in order to remain in the program. As of June 1999, 40 students had
completed the program and graduated from high school, and 100% of these students have entered
college. Nearly 90% of the students in college are majoring in either science, math, or engineering;
and more than a half a million dollars has been awarded to program participants in  college

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          3.2

-------
 	Chapter 3
                                    Public Participation and Training Initiatives


 scholarships and grants. The rising 12th graders serve as apprentices with mentors at EPA during
 the 6 week summer program, during which time they work in an actual research setting with an EPA
 scientist. Student projects in 1999 included: Comparison of 3 Buffer Systems for the Extraction of
 ACHE Activity from Rat Tissues; Role of the GSTTI-I Gene and the Risk for Stomach Cancer;
 Immunohistochemical Localization of Proteins in Embryos; Analysis of Heart Rate, Concentration,
 and Temperature  versus Time Through Matlab; The Conversion of the  EPA Annex Waste
 Management Storage Facility from a Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator to a Large
 Quantity Generator; The Analysis of Shaped Behavior in Laboratory Rats;  and Genotoxicity of
 Bromobenzene in Mouse Splenocytes as Measured by the Cytochalasin B Binucleate and Comet
 Assays.
 Region 10

 Environmental Justice Law and Policy Seminar. The Office of Civil Rights and Environmental
 Justice (OCREJ) and The Urban League of Portland team-taught an Environmental Justice Law and
 Policy seminar at Northwestern School of Law, Lewis and Clark College during Winter Term 1999.
 The 15-week seminar emphasized public participation, and community members were invited to
 attend and develop collaborative relationships with the 20 law students enrolled in the class. Legal
 research and field studies projects, proposed by OCREJ's environmental justice community contacts
 (representing community and neighborhood groups, community service organizations, universities,
 industry, government, medical/health, legal and media stakeholders) were selected by students who
 worked with community mentors. The seminar helped to:  (1) develop the environmental justice
 knowledge base of the community residents and students; (2) facilitate environmental justice
 networking between communities and law school graduates; (3) meet the requests of universities for
 increased EPA involvement in their programs; and (4) support the Region 9 recruitment strategy.

                                 Interagency Training

Region 3

Interagency Environmental Justice Training. As part of the Environmental Issues Seminars, and
interagency cooperation, Region 3's Office of Enforcement, Compliance and Environmental Justice
(OECEJ), and a representative from the Superfund program, conducted a series of environmental
justice training sessions  at the Environmental Policy Institute. During these sessions, Region 3 case
studies and experiences were used as a backdrop for discussions of the history of the environmental
justice movement in the U.S.,  different  perspectives on the environmental justice movement, and
policy and guidance issues. The audience for these sessions were managers  from most federal
Agencies. Since this training began, more than 500 managers have taken the training.

 EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
 Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          3.3

-------
                                   	Chapter 3
                                    Public Participation and Training Initiatives
GIS Demographic Mapper. The user friendly GIS mapping tool, developed by Region 3 in 1996,
continues to be refined. This Arc View-based screening tool provides vital demographic information
for any area in question, and allows the user to better understand and characterize areas of concern.
Presentations on the mapper and its various applications in the environmental justice arena have been
made for the states of Maryland, Delaware,  and  Pennsylvania; the  cities of Philadelphia and
Wilmington; EPA Region 7; the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center; and the Republic of
South Africa. Copies of the application were requested by the Department of the Interior, which has
in turn forwarded the application to other Federal agencies for evaluation and comment.
Region 8

Environmental Justice Workshop. The Region 8 Workshop is designed to increase understanding
of a complex issue  and improve clarity about environmental justice concepts and applications. To
date, Region 8 has presented it 37 times, to a total of 748 participants. Between 1/99-8/00, the
workshop was presented to a total of 394 participants, including other federal agencies such as the
US Army Corps of Engineers, the US Fish and Wildlife  Service, and the Southwest Strategy, a
coalition of federal and state agencies. Other participants included representatives of community
organizations, industry, and the Environmental Council of States. Region 8 continues to conduct the
environmental justice workshop in response to external requests and collaborates with other regions
when the requests come from outside of the region.

Region 10

Interagency Regulatory Analysis Committee. A representative from Region 10, OCREJ was a
presenter at the Interagency Regulatory Analysis Committee (IRAQ of King County, Washington
on October 27, 1999. The mission of IRAC is to create a more effective and efficient means of
protecting public health and safety through coordination of regulatory agencies. Approximately 30
representatives attended.  The presentation focused on education and understanding various levels
of environmental problems and regulations, environmental justice, the environmental justice grants
programs, and the work of environmental justice grantees.

Forest Service Environmental Justice Training/Workshop.  A member  of the Environmental
Justice Core Group, stationed in the Region 10 Alaska Operations Office, participated in an
environmental justice workshop in Ketchikan, Alaska, hosted by the Central Council of the Tlingit
and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska and the U. S. Forest Service. The workshop focused on identifying
and addressing disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental affects of federal
agencypolicies and decisions onminority and low income populations. The Region 10 representative


 EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
 Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                           3.4

-------
 	Chapter 3
                                    Public Participation and Training Initiatives


participated on a panel discussion focusing on subsistence hunting and fishing by Native Americans
and the potential disproportionate impacts from such a lifestyle.

                                    State Training

Region 3

All-States Environmental Justice Conferences.  During 1999 and 2000, Region 3's Office of
Enforcement, Compliance and Environmental Justice (OECEJ) convened two  (2) All-States
Environmental Justice Conferences with all of the states, and the District of Columbia, in Region 3.
The purpose of the conference was to create a forum to discuss environmental justice guidance,
policies, real world problems and solutions.  The conferences were a success in that they opened a
continuing dialogue between EPA and the states on issues of environmental justice. Since July 1999,
EPA and the states have held regularly scheduled monthly conference calls to continue the dialogue,
share experiences and identify and find solutions to real environmental justice issues.

Region 8

State Agencies.  Region 8 provided environmental justice  training to  several state agencies,
including Utah Department  of Transportation, Colorado Department  of Public Health  and
Environment, and Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality. Participants in these workshops
included state employees, industry, and community representatives.

                                    Tribal Training

Environmental Planning for Small Native American Communities. This three (3) day seminar
covers all aspects of environmental planning, including wastewater treatment, drinking water, solid
waste management, non-point source pollution, pollution prevention, and compliance. There are also
modules on identifying  environmental problems in the community and promoting community
participation in environmental issues. In addition to standard lecture, the course includes hands-on
laboratory experiments, tours of local environmental facilities, and exchange of ideas and experiences
among participants. The class was developed and delivered by Montana Tech University, with guest
lecturers from state environmental agencies, EPA, and tribal personnel. The target audience is small
Native American tribes without sophisticated infrastructure or extensive staff.  The seminar was
offered in Albuquerque, NM in 1999 and Muskogee, OK in 2000, with plans for offering it a third
time in  Alaska.  All seminar modules and materials are available through the Montana Tech
Environmental Learning Community at http://multimedia.mtech.edu/elc.


 EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
 Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                           3.5

-------
                                   	Chapter 3
                                    Public Participation and Training Initiatives
Tribal Training Module on Watershed Monitoring Design. Under a cooperative agreement with
the River Network, EPA is currently in the process of producing a training module (expected by the
end of 2000) consisting of a guidebook and workshop materials to introduce tribes to the principles
of designing a water quality monitoring program, generating credible data, and using their data
effectively.  The goal of this  project is to  build capacity within tribes to design, manage, and
implement their own water  quality monitoring programs, and to generate data they can use to make
their own planning decisions and better meet assessment requirements under the Clean Water Act.
The training module will be integrated into other existing tribal training programs, such as Tribal
Nonpoint Source Pollution  Workshops and Tribal Watershed Training.

Region 1

Tribal Environmental Training Conference - 3rd Annual. Region 1 is continuing to develop and
foster integrated federal agency initiatives and build partnerships to address environmental justice
issues of concern. On March 27-29, 2000, the 3rd Annual New England Tribal Environmental
Training  Conference was held in Hyannis, MA on Cape Cod.  The conference provided a unique
opportunity for tribes to meet with federal agencies to build partnerships that will work toward
common  goals in protecting the environment. The goal of the conference was to enhance protection
of the health and  environment of Indian  Country through partnering, science, and education on
traditional Indian values.
    The conference was hosted by the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) and  entitled
"Integrating Native Culture with Modem Technology: Protecting  Mother Earth for our Children".
Participants  included  the  Passamaquoddy Indian Township, Passamaquoddy Pleasant Point,
Penobscot Nation, Houlton Band of Maliseet, Aroostook Band of Micmac, Narragansett Tribe,
Mashantucket Pequot Tribe,  Mohegan  Tribe,  the US EPA-New England, Natural Resource
Conservation Service, Fish and Wildlife Service and the Department of Defense.

Region 8

Tribal Elders NEP A/Environmental Justice Training. At the request of the Lower Brule Sioux
Tribe, in February 1999, Region 8 staff from environmental justice  and NEPA offices presented
information on environmental justice and NEPA to a gathering of about 70 tribal elders representing
the Sioux Tribes along the main stem of the Missouri River.
 EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
 Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          3.6

-------
                                                               	Chapter 4
                                                                Outreach Initiatives
       EPA-sponsored outreach initiatives build on the Agency's public participation and training
initiatives.  The wide variety of outreach efforts serve to stimulate stakeholder involvement in the
efforts to provide for environmental justice. For the past couple of years, the OEJ and regional
environmental justice programs have been sponsoring these outreach programs. The majority of
current projects involve EPA outreach to, and the involvement of,  local communities, joint
investigations of specific areas of concern, community capacity-building, and development of
workable solutions. The following is a discussion of some of these environmental justice initiatives.
                                       Outreach

Environmental  Justice: Strengthening the Bridge  Between  Economic Development and
Sustainable Communities.   With support from the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), EPA
partnered with the Department of Justice to coordinate this major conference.  Over 220 multi-
stakeholders attended, and as a result of this meeting, proceedings and a videotape were published
and presented at the 29th Annual CBC Legislative Session (Fall, 1999). The Medical University of
South Carolina and South Carolina University were the academic partners who helped plan and
coordinate the meeting. The CBC subsequently established an EJ Braintrust and as an outgrowth of
recommendations,  a  National  Environmental  Policy  Commission  was formed to  identify
environmental issues and to articulate a range of policy alternatives for consideration by policy
makers. Also, regional "Listening Sessions" on EJ issues were started during FY 2000. Another
result was the renewed interest in the re-establishment of the Federal Interagency Working Group,
coordinated by EPA, Headquarters.

National Watershed Outreach Conference. The Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds and
the Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water cosponsored the National Watershed Outreach
Conference from April 17-19, 2000 in San Diego, California.  This conference was also sponsored
by the Aquatic Outreach Institute (Richmond, California), the University of California Cooperative
Extension/Sea Grant Extension Program, and the County of San Diego Watershed Working Group.
The conference provided a forum for a variety of stakeholders to share various outreach techniques
related to a wide range of watershed issues and motivated attendees to explore both traditional and
nontraditional outreach techniques. There were a number of sessions at the conference that focused
on outreach techniques that target minority or disadvantaged communities. For example, one session
focused on developing strategies for soliciting Latino communities in watershed education by
learning how to  adapt resources to Latino needs and interests; and another session focused on
involving at-risk urban youth, many of which who have been through the juvenile court system, in
wetland restoration activities.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          4.1

-------
                                                              	Chapter 4
                                                               Outreach Initiatives
Wetlands Education Activities.  Wetlands Division staff presented Environmental Education
programs to several groups of disadvantaged students, including Junior Rangers and students from
Virginia and Washington, DC schools. The Wetlands Division also staffed exhibits and several
events in the area, including the Kingman Lake dedication project which is staffed by Community
Conservation Corps youth. The Wetlands Division also participated in EPA's partnership with the
Cesar Chavez School on environmental projects.

Region 1

Hartford, CT. Hartford has a population of approximately 130,000 people living in an area of 18.4
square miles, sub-divided into 17 neighborhoods. Minority residents in Hartford comprise 70% of
the population and also has the lowest per capita income in Connecticut at $24,000. Childhood lead
poisoning rates in Hartford are at 13 percent, twice the State average. The City of Hartford declared
an Asthma Emergency due to alarming asthma rates and the fact that childhood asthma is the leading
cause of school absenteeism and hospitalization. Region 1 worked with community partners to host
an Asthma Education Forum on June 22, 2000 that brought over 100 people together to discuss the
issue and identify opportunities to improve community access to information and services. Region
1 is also working with community and academic partners in Hartford to create an interactive, multi-
lingual environmental education and information web page to provide increased public access to
critical environmental and public health problems facing local residents.
Region 2

Environmental Justice Enforcement Workshop in NYC.  This educational workshop was
designed to empower local citizens in New York City (NYC) to recognize and report environmental
violations and demonstrate how citizen complaints  can result in enforcement actions against
violators.  Citizens can have a positive impact on their communities by helping to deter violators
through the citizen complaint process. In addition, workshop handouts were provided to promote
community awareness of the strong EPA/State inspection and enforcement presence in the afore-
mentioned five targeted NYC communities. Regulatory agency program contacts, hotline numbers,
and Internet web sites were also provided  to the community.  Hosted by Region 2 and the
Department of Justice, the workshop was held in fulfillment of an EPA commitment made at the
March 6,1999 EPA/White House Council on Environmental Quality forum on environmental justice
in NYC.  Very positive feedback was received from the public and workshop panelists.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          4.2

-------
                                                              	Chapter 4
                                                               Outreach Initiatives
Community Based Environmental Protection (CBEP) Program.  Region 2 is committed to
supporting environmental protection at the local level. In this matter, we have developed a web site
that provides easy access to a broad set of resources for communities, including tools for learning
about and improving the environment, directories of community grants and financial assistance, as
well as links to EPA contacts and other information sources. The web site can be found at:
 http://www.epa.gov/region02/cgp/cgphmpg

Mercury Reduction and Pollution Prevention for Federal Facilities in the
Health  Care  Sector  Roundtable.   Region 2 has undertaken an  initiative  to implement a
memorandum of agreement with federal agencies throughout the region to address mercury concerns.
In order to start this effort, EPA elected to do a Federal Facilities Roundtable on February 22, 2000.
EPA staff also developed a work group which consisted of EPA, state, county and local government,
medical  school  environmental health and safety staff,  university medical school  staff,  and
professional and trade organizations in the health care sector.   This  group was instrumental in
providing information sources, and concepts that were used in developing the first program and plans
for future programs. The group became a conduit for information in the field, sources of documents
and experts, and ultimately sources for future events to be held throughout New York State.

Region 4

Environmental Justice Workshop:  Making Environmental Justice Work in Georgia.  Region
4's Air, Pesticides, and Toxics Management Division (APTMD) periodically coordinates with the
regional transportation partners on environmental justice issues related to transportation plans and
air quality. As part of this coordination and cooperation, APTMD participated in an environmental
justice workshop hosted by the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration - Georgia Division, and the Georgia Department of Transportation. The purpose of
this workshop was to provide transportation decision-makers with conceptual tools for effectively
implementing environmentaljustice principles in day-to-day decision-making. The Federal Highway
Administration  Southern Resource Center Director provided a history of transportation-related
activities that involved environmentaljustice issues. The presentation chronicled how, although the
elements of environmental justice have long been  incorporated  into the planning regulation,
interpretation of this regulation has been flexible enough that environmentaljustice has not always
been considered. A video was shown which demonstrated how an environmental "injustice" was
mitigated through the use of county funds and compromises to address citizens concerns. Other
presentations provided examples of how to incorporate environmentaljustice considerations into the
transportation planning process. Many of the presentations emphasized that environmentaljustice
considerations are a necessary component of good public involvement.
Environmentaljustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          4.3

-------
                                                               	Chapter 4
                                                                Outreach Initiatives
Citizen Training on Title V Air Permitting. Region 4 co-hosted a workshop on October 21-22,
2000 in Atlanta, GA to train citizens on public participation opportunities in the Title V air permit
issuance process.  Planning for the Region 4 workshop was coordinated by a diverse committee
consisting of representatives from EPA, the State of Georgia, and seven citizens and environmental
groups located in the Southeast. The purpose of the workshop was to introduce citizens to the Title
V air permitting process; give citizens tools, skills, and reference materials to help them review
proposed Title V permits and offer meaningful comments; explain the options available to citizens
to participate in the Title V process;  and, explain the tribal, state and federal roles in Title V
permitting.  Notice of this workshop was mailed to approximately 100 environmental justice
citizens, and environmental organizations throughout the eight states in Region 4 to encourage
attendance.

Brownfields Outreach in Southeast Florida. Region 4's South Florida Office, in coordination with
the Regional Planning Councils, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and local county
Brownfields Coordinators, has been meeting with local officials, community leaders, and the public
in numerous cities throughout the Southeast Florida Eastward Ho! corridor to inform them of the
many incentives available and potential benefits to the community through federal, state, and local
Brownfields assistance into their overall community revitalization efforts. This increased awareness
has resulted in the successful award of several Brownfields Assessment Pilots to local government
and the completion of numerous Targeted Brownfields Assessments to clarify contamination levels
at sites throughout the corridor.   This information enables the communities to pursue third party
cleanup and redevelopment of these abandoned parcels.

Environmental Health Fair. Environmental
justice staff spearheaded a cross-divisional team to participate in a community health fair in a local
disadvantaged community (Carver Homes area, Atlanta).  The fair was coordinated by Morehouse
School  of Medicine and  had several nonprofits and government agencies performing outreach
(August 1999).

Region 7

Environmental Justice Forum.  Over 200 participants attended the Environmental Justice Forum
held on August 10,2000 in Kansas City, Kansas.  Among the stakeholders in attendance at the forum
included: federal,  state, and local governments; non-profit organizations; environmental grassroot
organizations;  academia; tribal groups; transportation associations; and  engineering firms. The
Forum also included displays by current and past EPA environmental justice grant recipients and
EPA programs. Exhibits included: Metropolitan Energy Center, Operation SafeStreet, Nebraska
Recycling  Center,  Bridging the  Gap, the Wyman  Center,  Inc., LeadBusters, and  EPA's
Environmental Justice Program, Brownfields Program, and the Toxic Substances and Control Act

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          4.4

-------
	Chapter 4
                                                               Outreach Initiatives

Program.  The purpose of the Environmental Justice Forum was to allow the EPA an opportunity
to assert its  belief that partnerships between stakeholder  groups  is  vital  in  the pursuit  of
environmental justice. The Forum was a result of two meetings held in May 2000 with two different
stakeholder groups: (1) community environmental health organizations; and (2) federal agencies with
environmental justice responsibility, and their request to continue to engage in dialogue. The goal
of the Forum was to bring together various regional stakeholders, policy and decisionmakers, and
community members to learn about environmental justice and to build partnerships

Region 8

Natural Resources Environmental Justice  Symposium. This symposium was presented by the
Natural Resources Law Center (NRLC) of the University of Colorado at Boulder, in cooperation
with Region 8's Environmental Justice Program and Colorado People's Environmental and Economic
Network (COPEEN).  The symposium focused on environmental justice and natural resources
management.  The program consisted of a colloquium series, a book of collected essays, and a
conference/workshop. Region 8's environmental justice Program provided advice to the NRLC and
views the issue of natural  resources and environmental justice as critical for the West.  The
Symposium represents an important outcome of the developing partnership between Region 8 and
the Law Center. Additionally, an environmental justice analysis of a proposed flood control project
at Devils Lake, North Dakota, prepared by a Region 8 post-doctoral sociologist intern, was among
the presentations delivered at the workshop.
Region 10

Initiative on Asian American and Pacific Islanders. On May 10,2000, as part of the White House
Initiative on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, Region 10 hosted a meeting with members of
various Asian and  Pacific  Islander  community groups.   Also attending the meeting were
representatives from Washington State's Governor's  office, the Presidential Commission on
Asian/Pacific Islander Affairs, the Washington State Commission on Asian and Pacific American
Affairs, along with Region 10 staff and managers.  EPA reported on a study conducted to determine
the effect of toxic substances on seafood resources used by Asian/Pacific Islander communities.

Networking for Communities. Region 10's Office of Civil Rights and Environmental Justice
hosted a networking meeting designed for environmental justice advocates in Western Washington
to expand their professional resources and connections regarding environmental justice in the Seattle
and Tacoma area, entitled "Environmental Justice Partners Joining Together." The purpose of the
meeting was to learn how environmental justice professionals throughout Western Washington can
work together to address environmental justice issues.  In attendance were representatives from
Washington Department of Ecology, Washington Toxics Coalition, Washington Department of

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          4.5

-------
	Chapter 4
                                                              Outreach Initiatives

Transportation, Seattle King County Department of Health, Community Coalition for Environmental
Justice, El Centra De la Raza, and Refugee Federation Services Center.
                                 Tribal Consultation

Guide on Tribal Consultation and Public Participation.  The National Environmental Justice
Advisory Council, a federal advisory council to the EPA, prepared a Guide on "Consultation and
Collaboration with Indian Tribal governments and the Public Participation of Indigenous Groups and
Tribal Members in Environmental Decision Making," for EPA and other stakeholders to better
understand the unique political status of federally recognized tribes, and how federal agencies and
other governments are to work with tribes on a government to government basis. The document also
explains the differences between consultation with tribal governments and public participation.  A
copy of the Guide can be found at the following web address:
http://www.epa.gov/oeca/main/ei/fgconsult.html
                               International Outreach

Roundtable on Environmental Justice on the U.S. Mexico Border. On August 19-21,1999, EPA
sponsored the Roundtable on Environmental Justice on the U. S. Mexico Border, in National City,
California. Over two hundred participants from U. S .-Mexico border communities and organizations,
the National  Environmental  Justice Advisory  Council's   International  and Enforcement
Subcommittees, EPA  and other U.S. government officials along with Mexican  counterparts
dialogued on quality of life issues on the border. The Roundtable included an all day site tour, public
comment periods, a senior EPA panel, a panel of the Region 6 and Region 9 border offices, and four
(4) breakout sessions: (1) Environmental Justice and Labor; (2)   Immigration; (3) Trade and
Environment; and  (4)  Indigenous Peoples Issues and Health.   The last morning included the
presentation of recommendations from the break-out groups.
   Categorizing the recommendations into short, medium and long term goals, EPA responded to
over 40 of the recommendations within 30 days after the Roundtable and continues to work on the
more complex recommendations, several involving negotiations with the government of Mexico.
Subcommittee members and environmental justice representatives have worked closely with EPA
invoking the concerns of the environmental justice community and offering comments in the early
developing  stages of newly formed work plans, projects and policies that address Roundtable
recommendations.

South Africa Work Group. EPA implemented the recommendation of the South Africa Work
Group (SAWG) of the International Subcommittee of the National Environmental Justice Advisory
Council (NEJAC) to "link environmental justice groups in the U.S. with South Africa Groups who

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         4.6

-------
	Chapter 4
                                                               Outreach Initiatives

are addressing similar issues." In May 2000, EPA hosted delegates representing the South Africa
environmental justice community for an intensive program in the southeastern United States.  The
delegates spent ten days visiting communities that face environmental justice challenges similar to
those in South Africa. There was a one day "Lessons Learned " session from the U.S. experience
and a discussion of what still needs to be achieved. After the session on the history of NEJAC,
delegates attended the entire NEJAC meeting where they observed the process and met experts and
activists from around the country.  The Agency is assisting the South Africans in developing
proposals and conducting other follow-up work.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          4.7

-------
                                                                         Chapter 5
                        Assessment Methodologies, Assessment Guidance, and
                                                          Community Assessments
       Over the last two years, EPA has seen a growth in the number and type of environmental
justice assessment methodologies and community-based studies which are beginning to help the
Agency, and other interested parties, better understand the extent and nature of the environmental
and public health concerns facing low-income and/or minority communities. These assessment
methodologies and community-based studies are helping the EPA and other federal agencies
improve their efforts to identify, assess, prioritize, and allocate resources to review those concerns.
       The Agency is also working to enhance the usefulness and delivery of its environmental
information  to all segments of the public.  By  continuing to seek opportunities to provide
information through various database systems, educational materials, and analytic tools, the Agency
expects these data and tools to be used by communities to participate more meaningfully in the
environmental decision- making process.
       The following chapter presents a brief synopsis of activities that have been performed or are
currently in place to build upon the Agency's  ability to  quantitatively identify and address
allegations of environmental injustice.
                              Assessment Methodologies
Air Screening Manual for Communities. EPA is embarking on a cross-program collaborative
effort to develop a manual to help communities interested in conducting a risk-based air-screening
exercise. The Air Screening How-To Manual will help communities develop a better understanding
of their local air quality and identify priorities for making improvements. The manual will lay out
a step-by-step process for improving local air quality, from forming a partnership to identifying
pollution prevention opportunities for addressing communitypriorities. The manual will be designed
to build the long-term capacity of communities to understand and address air quality issues.
       Work on the manual will be based on the experiences of the Air Committee of the Baltimore
Community Environmental Partnership.  The Air Committee, a broad partnership of Baltimore
residents, industry, and governments, worked together for three (3) years to develop and implement
a six-step (6) screening methodology to review the toxic releases from the multiple facilities located
in and around the industrial neighborhoods of south Baltimore. The manual will incorporate the
lessons learned in Baltimore and the comments of peer reviewers to refine and expand the
methodology developed by the Air Committee.  A case study summarizing the work of the Air
Committee in both printed and electronic versions is now available.
       The development of an effective manual will require further community input.  The Agency
team working on the manual is now looking for community stakeholders and other partners to help
with the development of the manual.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          5.1

-------
                                                                          Chapter 5
                        Assessment Methodologies, Assessment Guidance, and
                                                           Community Assessments
Region 2
Chicago Cumulative Risk Initiative. In response to a Chicago Legal Clinic Petition filed in 1996
on behalf of 11 community advocacy groups, EPA began the Chicago Cumulative Risk Initiative
(CCRI). This effort is designed to identify and address issues of cumulative environmental loading
and health risks from multiple sources in Cook County, Illinois and Lake County, Indiana.  Several
useful tools for this initiative will be developed in partnership with both the community stakeholders
as well as the regulatory stakeholders, including federal, state and local government agencies.  One
of the tools to be developed will be an environmental loadings  profile, which summarizes all
available multimedia data, including emissions and ambient data. This loadings profile is currently
undergoing peer review. In addition,  a user-friendly database is being developed that will facilitate
integration of available environmental  data for the two (2) county area.  The partnership is also
developing a Cumulative Risk Screening tool that will focus on air sources only. This cumulative
risk screening tool will evaluate environmental databases of both air emissions and ambient air data,
along with toxicity weighting factors, to identify areas characterized by high hazard. The screening
tool will also consider available health data in order to identify susceptible populations, focusing on
children, especially those with asthma, elevated blood  lead  concentrations or leukemia. This
cumulative risk screening document will tentatively be  available for peer review by  the end of
calendar year 2000.  The stakeholders are also currently developing communication, outreach and
utilization strategies for the tools developed by the initiative.
Environmental Justice GIS Application.
The Region 2 Environmental Justice Application is an evolving Arc View application that provides
a step-by-step tool for evaluating selected areas for potential environmental justice concern based
on a demographic criteria and a suite of indicators of environmental burden (environmental load
profile). Environmental justice potential based on demographic characteristics is determined based
on statistical  comparison between the  selected community of concern and a series of statistical
reference areas. 1990 Census block  group data are used for this determination. Assessment of
disproportionate burden is based on  a set of indicators in the Environmental Load Profile, which
currently contains the following elements: (1) Relative Burden Analysis based on data from TRI;
(2) Facility Density vs Population Density; (3) Ambient Air Quality; and (4) Land Use. Additional
indicators will be added as data become available. The application is a work in progress pending
public release of the Region 2 Policy on Identifying environmental justice areas  and development
of  a  statistical methodology  for defining  environmental  justice  areas.   Statistical  method
development is a cooperative effort among Region 2 staff, and researchers from EMSL Las Vegas
and Hunter College.  Eventually the tool will be migrated from an Arc View application to a web-
based tool.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          5.2

-------
                                                                        Chapter 5
                       Assessment Methodologies, Assessment Guidance, and
                                                          Community Assessments
Region 6
Federal Facilities Assessments. Evaluation of environmental risks from federal facilities require
assessments of several unique issues. Toxicities from spent munitions, low level nuclear waste, air
and water emissions from aircraft operations and maintenance, and land destruction are a few of
these issues. Part of the assessment of federal facilities includes the region's Environmental Justice
Index.  The economics, housing, and minority representation of service personnel is different from
the general population. The Region's Environmental Justice Index is used to identify these different
stressors and demographics. In partnership with Region 6, the Department of Defense will have two
Army facilities pilot the environmental assessment GIS screening methodology, which includes
evaluation of environmental justice and other socioeconomic parameters.

Healthy Environments and Living Places (HELP) For Kids: The methodologies and material
for the Healthy Environments and Living Places (HELP) for Kids Project were finalized. HELP for
Kids is a program that supplies local community organizations with the material and training to assist
community members in evaluating their homes, home-based  child  care, or schools for the
environmental threats their children are exposed to on a day-to-day basis. All environmental issues
inside these three (3) environments are evaluated, including indoor  air quality, lead-based paint,
asthma, pesticides, mold, hazardous household materials, and radon.  The program was pilot tested
in Albuquerque,  New Mexico with the American Lung Association where training and several
investigations were conducted. A grant was given to a local non-profit organization, the Community
Health Partnership, to continue the program in a low-income, Spanish-speaking area of Albuquerque.
Region 10

Geo-referenced Environmental and Health Databases.   In  support of efforts to identify
communities that receive disproportionate impacts, the Office of Civil Rights and Environmental
Justice (OCREJ) has worked  with  Oregon Department of Environmental Quality  (ODEQ),
Washington Department of Health and OEA to identify and acquire geo-referenced environmental
and health databases for the states of Oregon and Washington. This information will augment
databases currently available through the Regional GIS mapping program, providing information on
health and  environmental impacts normally residing in state and local environmental  agency
databases.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          5.3

-------
                                                                        Chapter 5
                       Assessment Methodologies, Assessment Guidance, and
                                                         Community Assessments

	Community/Site Specific Assessments

Region 4

Project XL -  Atlantic Steel  Redevelopment.  Environmental justice staff created a special
Environmental Justice Focus Group (comprised of local environmental and environmental justice
advocates) to ensure compliance with the Executive Order on Environmental Justice 12898 and help
identify/address community concerns regarding the proposed redevelopment  plan and the Project
XL Agreement. The Project XL Team (Region 4 management and staff) responded to a couple of
key issues:  water management, and revisiting the  Superfund assessment of an adjacent EPA
Removal site.  Environmental justice staff contributed to the development of an environmental
justice methodology that was used in the NEPA Environmental Assessment
Region 5

Stormwater Management Effort in the Metro East Area. - In August, September, and October
1999, Gateway Team members attended a series of meetings of the Metro East Regional Stormwater
Committee. The Committee, made up of representatives from local, state, and federal government,
exists to solve water quantity and quality problems that are a result of Stormwater in the Metro East
St. Louis area. The Gateway Team has facilitated the process of creating a strategic plan which not
only represents the Committee's goals but strives to create a regional Stormwater implementation
plan.  This document will: (1) educate and bring  a vision to the greater community; (2) initiate
assistance in carrying out Stormwater goals; (3)  serve as the Committee's recommendation at the
state and  county  levels; and  (4) showcase past  collaborative Stormwater efforts initiated by
Committee members. The document is planned for completion by the end of 2000 and the objective
is to disseminate the document to the larger community for input via public meetings and forums
which the Gateway Team will facilitate. The Gateway Team began concentrating on the Stormwater
effort due to community concerns and as part of its overall work to  pursue sustainable growth
principles in the Metro East St. Louis area.
Region 6

Dioxin Exposure Investigation. In December 1998, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         5.4

-------
                                                                         Chapter 5
                        Assessment Methodologies, Assessment Guidance, and
                                                          Community Assessments

Registry (ATSDR) conducted an Exposure Investigation (El). The purpose  of the El was to
determine if there was evidence of exposure to dioxins in Mossville, Louisiana residents.  Blood
samples were collected  from 28  community  residents and were analyzed for chlorinated
dibenzodioxins (CDDs), chlorinated dibenzofurans (CDFs), and coplanerpolychlorinatedbiphenyls
(PCBs). A limited investigation of environmental contamination was also conducted: four surface
soil samples and two chicken eggs were collected and analyzed for CDDs and CDFs. A breast milk
sample from one resident was also analyzed. ATSDR, the Louisiana Department of Health and
Hospitals (LDHH), LDEQ, and EPA is currently involved in a multi-agency effort to determine the
source and extent of the high serum dioxin levels.

Citizens' Air Monitoring "Bucket Brigade."  Region 6 awarded a grant to a Calcasieu Parish
environmental action group in FY99 in the amount of $50,000 to be used for activities related to air
monitoring and analyses via the bucket brigade.  The bucket brigade is a community-based air
sampling program that uses special buckets to capture air samples during industrial accidents or
emissions  or when residents smell chemical odors. The samples will be sent to Region 6's Houston
lab to be tested and determine whether neighbors of local industrial plants  were exposed to toxic
chemicals. This effort empowers residents to execute their own air monitoring program and assess
potential effects of emissions on their health and environment.
Region 8

North Park Hill Community Assessment.  This community is in northeast Denver, immediately
east of the VB/I-70 Superfund site. The residents of North Park Hill are primarily low-income with
mixed ethnicity (largely African American with some Hispanic and white populations). The National
Association of Black Environmentalists (NABE) received an Environmental Justice Through
Pollution Prevention grant to identify possible sources of pollution in the neighborhood and identify
mitigation measures. To achieve these goals, several residential yards were sampled for arsenic.
From the 30 yards sampled, five (5) to seven (7) showed arsenic concentrations in excess of 400
parts per million. The source of the arsenic was not identified. These findings have raised a number
of issues for  Region 8. Are these findings associated with the  contamination in the  VB/I-70
Superfund site?  What potential exposure do residents face? How extensive is this contamination?
What are  the probable sources (airborne  smelter wastes, fill material from nearby smelters,
pesticides/herbicides)?  What should Region 8 do about this problem? Who is responsible for
paying for any follow-up actions? Region 8 is coordinating follow-up activities with the State of
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          5.5

-------
                                                                       Chapter 5
                       Assessment Methodologies, Assessment Guidance, and
                                                         Community Assessments

Colorado and the City and County of Denver.

Region 10

Environmental  Impact Statement  Environmental Justice Reviews.   OCREJ performed
Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) reviews for three projects in Washington state: (1) Central
Link Light Rail Transit Project in Seattle; (2) Service Road 167 Corridor in Tacoma; and (3) White
River (Muckleshoot Indian Reservation) Amphitheater in Auburn.  Each EIS was reviewed to
determine if appropriate measures were taken to identify environmental justice communities, if
environmental justice communities were subject to disproportionate  impacts, and,  if public
participation was adequate and meaningful. Of particular importance is the involvement by OCREJ
in the Central Link Light Rail Transit Project in Seattle. OCREJ has been the Regional point of
contact for citizen concerns regarding the disproportionate environmental, health and quality of life
impacts in low-income and minority neighborhoods.  In addition, OCREJ is a member of the EIS
development team for the Pogo Mine project in Alaska.

Assessing Impacts to Communities from Facilities Regulated by Title V. Region 10 OCREJ,
worked with the Office of Air Quality (OAQ), the Office of Environmental Assessment (OEA), and
the Oregon Operations Office (OOO), to identify potential environmental justice communities in
Portland, Oregon, that may be affected by a facility regulated under Title V  of the Clean Air Act.
OCREJ and the OOO were contacted by residents of the area indicating that their concerns about air
toxics, odor and particulate impacts on environmental justice communities were not adequately
addressed by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality in their review of the facility's Title V
permit. OCREJ has identified the communities in the area that meet national  income and people of
color population criteria, and will be working with OAQ and OEA to determine if those communities
meeting national environmental justice criteria are disproportionately impacted by the facilities in
the area.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         5.6

-------
                     	Chapter 6
                      Targeting, Environmental Health, and Exposure Studies
       EPA has long been involved in studies to identify contaminates in the environment and
understand their impact on public health. The Agency also recognizes the importance of compliance
assistance and enforcement in preventing and reducing unlawful emissions of contaminants into the
environment.

       Protecting the health of all communities represents a formidable challenge to the Agency.
However, this responsibility does not rest solely with EPA, but is shared with other federal agencies
(e.g. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, Agency for Toxic
Substances andDisease Registry, National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences.) In January
2000, the U.S. Surgeon General issued the publication, "Healthy People 2010: Understanding and
Improving Health." The second goal presented in this report is to eliminate health disparities among
different segments of the population.  According to the report,  there is clear evidence of health
disparities among under-served minority groups. The report identifies environmental quality as a
leading health indicator.

       EPA is working with other agencies to secure disease prevention and health improvements
in communities where health disparities exist that may result from, or  be exacerbated by,
disproportionate effects of environmental pollutants and certain racial, ethnic and socioeconomic
factors. The Agency is seeking to accomplish this goal in a couple of ways: (1) targeting compliance
assistance and enforcement of environmental laws; and (2)  conducting studies which look at
environmental health and exposure of minority and low-income communities. The following chapter
discusses some of these compliance efforts and specific studies.
                                  Targeting Studies

Region 4

Using Compliance Activity Tracking System (CATS) Data to Target Farm Worker Protection
Efforts. CATS Worker Protection Standard data and farm worker Department of Agriculture data
were compared and presented to state pesticide program leaders at their semiannual meeting.
Comparisons/analyses such as these help states target specific geographic areas for increases in farm
worker protection efforts.  Additionally, regional project officers gain insight into a state's worker
protection program which can be valuable during grant negotiations and assessing state needs.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          6.1

-------
                     	Chapter 6
                      Targeting, Environmental Health, and Exposure Studies
Region 8
North Denver Environmental Initiative. In partnership with the state, counties, and cities, the
Environmental Justice Program has initiated a three year effort to focus enforcement, compliance
assistance and pollution prevention activities in the North Denver area. During public meetings
sponsored by Region 8, as part of the Vasquez Boulevard/I-70 Superfund project, numerous non-
Superfund environmental concerns were voiced by the North Denver environmental justice
communities.  Citizens described concerns about negative health effects that they believe to be the
result of the saturation  of industrial and other pollution generating uses in the area. The North
Denver Environmental Initiative (NDEI) is Region 8's response to these concerns. The NDEI is
envisioned to be a cooperative partnership utilizing federal, state, county, and local government
authorities to proactively address community concerns regarding potentially harmful environmental
consequences of the industrial and transportation developments in their neighborhoods. Region 8
seeks to work with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, the City and County
of Denver, Tri-County Health Department, and Commerce City on this initiative.  NDEI goals are
to: (1) get NDEI industrial facilities into compliance through increased enforcement and compliance
assistance; (2) get NDEI industrial facilities  above and beyond compliance  through pollution
prevention; and (3) effectively work with all NDEI partners.  The NDEI area includes the Vasquez
Boulevard/I-70 Superfund site and almost 500 industrial sources within and surrounding the Vasquez
Boulevard/I-70 site.  The environmental justice communities involved include Swansea/Elyria,
Globeville, Cole and Clayton. Region 8 has conducted 35 inspections as part of the NDEI.

Region 9

Lead Inspections. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Department
of Justice (DOJ) selected three large, metropolitan areas of the country which have large inner-city
areas where lead poisoning from lead-based painting was expected to be prevalent. Los Angeles was
selected in Region 9. Based on information provided by the state and county, Region 9 joined HUD
and DOJ to target and conduct inspections of apartment complexes where children with elevated
blood lead levels were living.  The three agencies conducted 44 inspections in large, older apartment
complexes.  The potential cases were divided between HUD and EPA. Region 9 has since issued
three notices of noncompliance  or violations of the lead disclosure rule.

Environmental Justice Enforcement Strategy.  Region 9 completed  an environmental justice
enforcement strategy as the first step in  integrating environmental justice into its  enforcement
activities.  Targeting inspections and  utilizing Supplemental Environmental Projects have been
highlighted as potential means to apply an environmental justice enforcement strategy. For FY 2000,
the Region  focused on environmental justice  communities  in  the  Los Angeles area.   Three
communities have been identified (South Central Los Angeles, East Los Angeles, Southeast Los

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          6.2

-------
                     	Chapter 6
                      Targeting, Environmental Health, and Exposure Studies
Angeles.) Each media division has developed an environmental justice enforcement work plan for
environmental justice communities in Los Angeles.  The environmental justice enforcement work
plans include the participation of state, county and local agencies in the implementation of
enforcement related efforts.

                     Environmental Health Assessments/Studies

Centers of Excellence in Children's Environmental Health Research. The Office of Pesticides
Programs and the Department of Health and Human Services have funded eight  "Centers of
Excellence in Children's Environmental Health Research."  Two of these centers involve farm
worker's children. The University of California at Berkeley will evaluate pesticide exposures and
growth/developmental status in the Salinas area, and the University of Washington will study the
health of children living in the farm worker community in the Yakima Valley.

Neural Tube Defect (NTD) Assessment Along The US-Mexican Border. The project purpose
is to document and reduce the prevalence of NTD on both sides of the border and elsewhere in
Mexico  through  case-control and epidemiological studies, fortification of flour and grain food
products, training of health professionals in the border region, and education of at-risk populations.

Region 1

Lawrence Risk-Based Air Screening. To identify the tools and actions that can best reduce the
risks to human health posed by air pollution in the city of Lawrence, MA, EPA seeks to identify the
most significant contributors  to human health risk from air pollution. EPA has funded  a project
through an Environmental Monitoring for Public Access and Community Tracking (BMP ACT) grant
that is being used to support community outreach and participation in Lawrence, MA.
      This project uses a combination of existing data on ambient air quality, modeling of
Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs), and other information to identify the chemicals (HAPs) and
sources of air pollution that are contributing the most to human health risk and decreased quality of
life in the city of Lawrence, MA. The project essentially seeks to assess the impact of air pollution
from stationary and mobile sources on human health, and to prioritize the contributors to that risk
in order to determine what chemicals or sources make ideal targets for community and government
response.  The project is conducted in collaboration with key community partners, and incorporates
feedback and guidance from these stakeholders. The prioritization of pollution sources is being used
to develop an "action agenda" to identify community-based measures that can be taken to reduce the
impact of the most hazardous chemicals or sources.
      The first major task is the development of a list of chemicals, facilities, and other sources
of air pollution ranked according to impacts on human health and other criteria identified by
stakeholders. The second major task is the communication of these results to the larger community.

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         6.3

-------
                     	Chapter 6
                      Targeting, Environmental Health, and Exposure Studies
The third task is the identification of action items necessary to reduce the most significant hazards,
and the development of a community-based action agenda.
       To accomplish this project Region 1 has partnered with EPA Headquarters, OPPTS (technical
assistance), Lawrence Environmental Justice Committee, Community Health Network Area 11-
Environmental Committee, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection,  and the
Massachusetts Department of Public Health.  Other stakeholders involved in this project are the
Lawrence community residents,  business and  industry, the City  of Lawrence, MA, academic
institutions (including Merrimack College and Northern Essex Community College).

Region 3

South/Southwest  Philadelphia  Environmental  Health  Characterization.   Region 3, in
partnership with Johns Hopkins University, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR), the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the City of Philadelphia, academics who serve on
a science advisory board, and local communities in the City of Philadelphia are working to develop
strategies to measure the level of key pollutants in the environment. The citizens of the study area
continue to request that EPA address their environmental concerns, specifically the air emissions
from the numerous auto repair body shops located in South Philadelphia.  Di-isocyanates, an air
emission from auto repair shops, is one of the main pollutants of concern to the South Philadelphia
residents.  Johns Hopkins University and ATSDR had recommended that further study be conducted
on the potential impact of di-isocyanates on the community. The partners associated with this effort
continue to work together to address concerns, and serve on the City of Philadelphia's Ad Hoc Air
Advisory Committee, as a result of the collaborative effort.

Chester, Pennsylvania Environmental Risk Study. Located approximately 15 miles  south of
Philadelphia, the City of Chester's minority population  is approximately 70 percent. Chester has
the highest concentration of industrial facilities in Pennsylvania, including two oil refineries, a large
medical waste facility, the Delaware County wastewater treatment plant,  a large trash  to steam
facility, and other waste facilities. Residents of Chester have long been concerned about the health
effects of living and working among toxic substances. Chester has the highest infant mortality rate
coupled with the lowest birth rate in the state. Since the early 1990s, Region 3 has been working,
in cooperation with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,  to address the environmental risks, health,
and regulatory issues in Chester.
       The Chester Implementation Workgroup, made up of representatives from the stakeholder
groups in Chester, was  created to address issues identified by the  community relating to health,
quality of life and land use.  Representatives  from 30 different  federal, state, county or city
agencies/departments, and citizens groups participated in this workgroup.  The workgroup distilled
the fifty (50) identified problem areas into five (5) key areas that predominantly impact the children
and youth of the City of Chester. The first area to be addressed was the reduction of children's blood

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          6.4

-------
                     	Chapter 6
                      Targeting, Environmental Health, and Exposure Studies
lead levels. Region 3, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Center for Disease
Control (CDC), Health and Human Services, and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry participated in the planning and strategy sessions, along with the Health Department of the
City of Chester and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.  The City of Chester obtained additional
funding for its Childhood Lead Poisoning Program from the CDC and Delaware County. Region
3's Office of Enforcement, Compliance and Environmental Justice has provided the partners with
insights and perspectives  on risk assessment, community and stakeholder involvement, public
participation, and various aspects of environmental justice including; historical perspectives, trends,
models, and strategy development. A Supplemental Environmental Project (SEP), resulting from
an EPA enforcement action taken in Chester, is on-going. The SEP is administrated by Chester
Residents Concerned for Quality Living.  The group, as part of the SEP, is attempting to complete
an extensive blood lead survey of children in Chester.  Also, as part of the SEP, the group is also
involved in the cleaning of homes in Chester to remove lead contamination.

Region 8

North Casper Community Alliance. A community-based organization in Casper approached the
State of Wyoming and Region 8 for assistance in addressing health issues that residents believe to
be the result of air, water, and soil contamination in their neighborhood. Studies conducted in the
North Casper neighborhood detected groundwater plumes containing PCE and other compounds,
and soil and indoor air contamination. EPA and the State of Wyoming requested involvement from
the Agency for Toxic  Substances  and  Disease Registry (ATSDR) to conduct health-based
investigations. ATSDR and EPA are discussing the formation of a "community alliance" to address
the health concerns expressed by the residents.   Region 8, ATSDR personnel, state and  city
representatives, and community members have committed to work together to address the range of
concerns raised.

Region 9

Tucson, AZ.  Residents of the south side of Tucson, AZ were exposed to unsafe levels of an
industrial solvent, trichloroethylene (TCE), which was discovered in their drinking water supply by
EPA and the City of Tucson in 1981.  EPA listed a large section of Tucson's south side as a Federal
Superfund Site in 1982 and since then, work to investigate  and cleanup the TCE contamination has
been on-going. The affected community is 50 to 75% Latino (according to the 1990 census)  and
low-to-medium income. Community concern has always focused on potential adverse health effects
caused by historic TCE exposure and obtaining access to health care for potential TCE-related
illnesses.
       Other community concerns include access to health and technical information about TCE and
EPA's TCE cleanup actions, eliminating any potential on-going exposure to TCE, addressing
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                         6.5

-------
                     	Chapter 6
                      Targeting, Environmental Health, and Exposure Studies
negative  economic impacts caused by the contamination, and taking legal action against the
companies responsible for the TCE contamination.  Several grassroots community groups have
formed to provide a voice to these community concerns and several of these groups established ties
with the Southwest Network for Economic and Environmental Justice (SNEEJ).
       On  November 4, 1999,  SNEEJ  met with Region 9 management to  express their
dissatisfaction with the level of community involvement in the negotiation of the Airport Property
Consent Decree which was lodged on June 17, 1999. They were concerned that: (1) the community
was  not  given adequate notice that EPA was  entering into negotiations with the potentially
responsible parties (PRPs); (2) EPA did not keep the community apprised of the Consent Decree
negotiations while they were occurring; and (3) a representative of the community did not participate
in the Consent Decree  negotiations.  SNEEJ also raised concerns about the existing Unified
Community Advisory Board (UCAB) bylaws not meeting environmental justice principles.
       As requested by SNEEJ, EPA will continue to update the Community Involvement Plan for
the site.  As part of this effort,  EPA conducted community interviews to  assess the Tucson
community needs and how the Agency can address them. EPA is continuing to explore available
resources to provide technical support to the community.  The local community continues to be
frustrated by the lack  of federal action regarding access to health care.

Ritualistic Uses of Mercury. Certain ritualistic, cultural and ethnic uses of elemental mercurymay
pose a significant health risk.  EPA is leading the multi-agency Ritualistic Use of Mercury Task
Force to  address  concerns of potential elemental mercury exposure in some Latin American and
Caribbean communities in the United States. The Task Force includes representatives from EPA,
the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), State and local health departments,
State environmental agencies and national Hispanic and Caribbean organizations.
       The Task Force will: (1) Gather and share information about efforts to evaluate the extent
of the problem; (2) Design a community-based strategic plan  for education and outreach to  reduce
use of, and exposure to, mercury; (3) Develop a research agenda to better define the extent of
distribution and problems resulting from ritualistic uses of mercury; and (4) Draft a proposed Public
Health and Environmental Management Protocol for Dealing with Ritualistic Uses of Mercury, if
needed. This protocol would be developed as information becomes available about the extent of the
problem and populations at risk. The protocol would cover outreach to affected populations, health
education activities and identify tiers of action to follow if a response is needed.

U.S.-Mexico Border Environmental Health Surveillance Demonstrations: Air Pollution and
Childhood Asthma.  As part of the effort to improve the quality of health related to environmental
issues along the border, EPA in partnership with other agencies, is supporting the binational data
gathering of asthma  prevalence in elementary school children.  Once adequate data bases are
established and analyzed, this information will be linked to air pollution levels/environmental
conditions at the time of increases in asthma reporting.  Having baseline data on childhood asthma
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          6.6

-------
                     	Chapter 6
                      Targeting, Environmental Health, and Exposure Studies
related illnesses and the linkage with air pollution/environmental conditions from the binational
U.S.-Mexico border states will assist state and federal agencies with future planning of health
services and environmental health surveillance activities.

                                  Exposure Studies

Pesticide Exposure.  The Office of Pesticides Programs (OPP) is collecting data on pesticides
exposures by co-funding and providing consultation to the National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health (NIOSH) for pesticide case reporting projects (surveillance systems) in five (5) states:
California, New York, Texas, Oregon and Florida. The surveillance systems, located in the state
health departments, include the collection of reports on human incidents of pesticide intoxication,
review of trends in disease over time and the response to outbreaks of disease. There is emphasis
placed on outreach and training to involved groups within the community (industry/farmers, workers,
community residents, health care providers and local government). Whenever possible, information
is obtained on take-home exposures to children as well as an evaluation of child or adolescent farm
work. It is anticipated that preliminary data on the first year of pesticide case reports for these five
states will be available in early 2001.

Characterizing the Unique  Aspects of  Human Exposure in Low SES Communities in the
Research Triangle Park, NC Area.  This partnership is intended to  improve  the scientific
community's  ability to conduct human exposure research in  low socioeconomic status (SES)
communities. This project will contribute to the advancement of knowledge for conducting human
exposure research in low SES communities and communicating the results of such studies to the
affected communities. The results of this project will  also benefit the local community where the
studies are conducted by improving outreach into the  community. The project will focus on four
issues:  1) Identifying environmental justice issues in the community; 2) Linking  community
members with researchers and health care providers through a series of research, education, and
outreach strategies designed to assess the environmental and health conditions of low SES
communities and to work toward improving these conditions; 3) Developing improved techniques
that will increase participant recruitment and retention rates for human exposure studies in low SES
communities; and 4) Developing improved techniques for communicating the results of studies in
low SES communities to the targeted populations.

Region 3

Baltimore Urban Environmental Initiative (BUEI). The BUEI is a major project being conducted
in Baltimore in cooperation with Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), the Baltimore
City Health Department, and the Baltimore City Planning Department. This proj ect is a cooperative
effort being conducted to identify and rank areas of disproportionate risk in the City of Baltimore

EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          6.7

-------
                     	Chapter 6
                      Targeting, Environmental Health, and Exposure Studies
for purposes of implementing risk reduction, pollution prevention, public awareness and other
activities to effectively eliminate, or at least minimize these risks. A two track approach was taken
in order to achieve these goals. An action oriented Short-Term Track, and a Long-Term Track which
incorporates risk screening and the development of focus groups to achieve project goals.  In the
Short-Term Track, grants awarded to the City of Baltimore and MDE have led to the development
of a number of projects designed to address environmental concerns in the areas of lead, hazardous
materials incidents, indoor air quality, fish consumption/toxins in the Baltimore Harbor, ground-level
ozone pollution, and air toxins.

Region 6

Monitoring Activities for Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma: Region 6 is providing monitoring
support for the Ponca Tribe of Indians (Ponca) of Oklahoma by providing grant funding for the
Oklahoma Tribal consortium, Inter-Tribal Environmental Council of Oklahoma (ITEC) to place and
run air monitors on Tribal lands. The Ponca lands are between the Conoco, Inc., refinery and the
Continental Carbon Company,  a carbon black plant.  The  monitors are measuring five criteria
pollutants, PM10, and PM2.5, and have been in place since April 1999.  Tribal members have
previously complained of respiratory problems and grey/black particles that cover their cars and
homes, to Region 6. Once ITEC accumulates sufficient monitoring data, the region will make its
determination as to the most appropriate action to pursue.

Region 8

Vasquez Boulevard/I-70.  The Vasquez Boulevard/I-70 Superfund site contains high levels of
arsenic and lead in residential soils. Region 8 and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry (ATSDR), in conjunction with the affected North Denver communities, are looking at the
exact nature and extent of the contamination and are assessing the extent of community exposure.
The  site  comprises more than four thousand houses surrounded by significant heavy and light
industry and bisected by a major Interstate highway. The neighborhoods are acutely aware of the
proximity of industry and its impacts on their way of life and their health.
       The community has come together to work on the removal of contaminated soils with the
EPA, ATSDR, the State of Colorado and the City and County of Denver.  As a part of this effort,
the community has brought their concern over commonly-observed incidences of asthma, thyroid
disorders, cancer and skin irritations to the various agencies. ATSDR is performing a Public Health
Assessment as a part of its obligations under Superfund.  Additional health and epidemiological
studies have been discussed by all parties as possible follow-ups to Superfund remediation.
EnvironmentalJustice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing to Move Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                          6.8

-------
                              	Appendix
                              EPA Environmental Justice Coordinators
For Headquarters:
Use this address and the Mail Code (MC)
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20460

                               HEADQUARTERS

CONTACTS:        	E-MAIL	OFFICE #    FAX #
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT - MC-3102-A
Carolyn Levine              levine.carolyn@epa.gov      202-564-1859 F: 202-564-1887

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
MC-6101-A
Wil Wilson                 wilson.wil@epa.gov         202-564-1954  F: 202-564-1549
AMERICAN INDIAN ENVIRONMENTAL
OFFICE - MC-4104
Bob Smith                 smith.bob@eDa.gov         202-564-0278  F: 202-564-1836

OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS - MC-1201-A
Mike Mattheisen            mattheisen.michael@epa.gov  202-564-7291  F: 202-501-1836

OFFICE OF COMMUNICATION,
EDUCATION & MEDIA RELATIONS - MC-1702-A
Doretta Reaves              reaves.doretta@epa.gov      202-564-7829  F: 202-501-1773

OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND
COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE - MC-2201-A
Shirley Pate                Date.shirlev@epa.gov        202-564-2607  F: 202-501-0284

OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
MC-2812-A
Janice Jablonski             iablonski.ianice@epa.gov     202-564-6663 F: 202-501-1627

OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE - MC 2201A
Mustafa Ali                ali.mustafa@epa.gov         202-564-2606  F: 202-501-0740

OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL - MC-2322-A
JeffKeohane               Keohane.ieff@epa.gov       202-564-5548  F: 202-564-554

OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES - MC-2610R
Wendy Graham             graham.wendv@epa.gov      202-564-6602  F: 202-565-2408
Environmental Justice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing To Work Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                             A-l

-------
                              	Appendix
                              EPA Environmental Justice Coordinators
CONTACTS:
E-MAIL
OFFICE #
FAX#
OFFICE OF POLICY, ECONOMICS & INNOVATION
 - MC-1802
{Catherine Dawes            dawes.katherine@epa.gov
Daria Willis                willis.daria@epa.gov
                          202-260-8394  F: 202-260-3125
                          202-260-7424
OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES &
TOXIC SUBSTANCES - MC-7101-M
Elaine Lyon                lyon.elaine@epa.gov

OFFICE OF REGIONAL OPERATIONS - MC-1108
Rochele Kadish             kadish.rochele@epa. gov
                          202-564-0547  F: 202-564-0660
                          202-564-3106  F: 202-501-0062
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT - MC-8103-R
Brenda E. Washington        washington.brenda@epa.gov   202-564-6781  F: 202-565-2912

OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE - MC-5101
Rey Rivera                 rivera.reiniero@epa.gov       202-260-1910  F: 202-260-6606
OFFICE OF WATER - MC-4102
Alice Walker               walker.alice@epa.gov
                          202-564-0498  F: 202-269-3597
                            REGIONAL CONTACTS:
USEPA, REGION 1
Kathy Castagna             castagna.katherine@epa. gov
One Congress Street, 11th Floor
Boston, MA 02203-0001
                          617-918-1429  F: 617-918-1029
USEPA, REGION 2
Terry Wesley
290 Broadway, 26th Floor
New York, NY 10007

USEPA, REGION 3
Reginald Harris
1650 Arch St. (MC-3ECOO)
Philadelphia, PA 19103

USEPA, REGION 4
Cynthia Peurifoy
61 Forsyth Street
Atlanta, GA 30303
weslev.terry@epa. gov
harris.reggie@epa.gov
peurifov.cynthia@epa.gov
212-637-5027  F: 212-6374943
215-814-2988  F: 215-814-2905
404-562-9649  F: 404-562-9664
Environmental Justice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing To Work Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                             A-2

-------
                              	Appendix
                               EPA Environmental Justice Coordinators
CONTACTS:
E-MAIL
OFFICE #
FAX#
USEPA, REGION 5
Karla Owens               ownes.karla@epa.gov
77 West Jackson Blvd.  T-16J
Chicago, IL 60604-3507
USEPA, REGION 6
Olivia R. Balandran
Fountain Place, 12th Floor.
1445 Ross Ave., (RA-D)
Dallas, TX 75202-2733
                          312-886-5993 F: 312-886-2737
balandran.olivia-r@epa.gov   214-665-7257 F: 214-665-6648
USEPA, REGION 7
Althea Moses               Moses.althea@epa.gov
901 North 5tth Street (ECORA)
Kansas City, KS 66101
                          913-551-7649 F:913-551-7941
USEPA, REGION 8
Elisabeth Evans
999 18th Street, Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202-2405

USEPA, REGION 9
Willard Chin
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
_evans.elisabeth@epa.gov
Chin.willard@epa. gov
303-312-6053  F:303-312-6409
415-972-3797  F: 415-947-3562
USEPA, REGION 10
Michael Letourneau          letourneau.mike@epa. gov
Victoria Plata               plata.victoria@epa.gov
1200 Sixth Avenue (CEJ-163)
Seattle, WA 98101
                          206-553-1687 F: 206-553-7176
                          206-553-8580 F: 206-553-7176
Environmental Justice 2000 Biennial Report:
Continuing To Work Towards Collaborative and Constructive Problem-Solving
                                              A-3

-------