United States
              Environmental Protection
              Agency
Enforcement and
Compliance Assurance
(2201 A)
EPA/300-R-97-004
August 1997
www.epa.gov
              Office of Environmental Justice
  &EPA  Environmental Justice:

              Working Toward Solutions
m

-------
                    TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE	 iii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY	  v

1   INTRODUCTION	  1

2   AD VANCING ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN THE
    FEDERAL GOVERNMENT	  3

    IMPLEMENTING ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AT EPA	  3
    EPA'S ROLE IN WORKING WITH OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES
    ON ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ISSUES	 10

3   INCREASING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND OUTREACH	 13

    THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVISORY
    COUNCIL (NEJAC)	 13
    ENHANCING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND OUTREACH  	 14
    ENHANCING CULTURAL DIVERSITY	 15
    OUTREACH EFFORTS	 17

4   SUPPORTING ECONOMIC/REDEVELOPMENT EFFORTS 	 19

    FORMING PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: CASE STUDIES  	 19
    EPA'S BROWNFIELDS ECONOMIC REDEVELOPMENT
    INITIATIVE	 20
    EMPOWERMENT ZONE/ENTERPRISE COMMUNITIES (EZ/EC)	 20
    COMMUNITY-BASED LEAD ABATEMENT DEMONSTRATION
    PROJECTS	 20

5   BUILDING CAPACITY FOR STAKEHOLDERS 	 23

    GRANTS PROGRAM 	 23
    TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 	 25

6   PROTECTING PUBLIC HEALTH	 27

    CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS 	 27
    URBAN RISK ASSESSMENTS 	28
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
7   UTILIZING LEGAL AND ENFORCEMENT TOOLS TO
    IMPLEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE DIRECTIVES	 31

    EPA-APPROVED AND DELEGATED ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS 	 31
    CITIZENS PETITION PROVISIONS - TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL
    ACT (TSCA) SECTION 21  	 31
    CITIZEN SUIT PROVISIONS	 32
    TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964	 32
    NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA)  	 33
    NATIONAL RELOCATION POLICY  	 33
    SETTLEMENT PROVISIONS 	 34
    ENFORCEMENT COMPLIANCE ACTIVITIES AND THE PUBLIC  	 34
    CITIZENS MONITORING PROGRAMS	 35
    EMERGING COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT INITIATIVES  	36

8   REGIONAL HIGHLIGHTS	 37

    REGION I	 37
    REGION II 	 39
    REGION III	 43
    REGION IV 	45
    REGION V	48
    REGION VI 	 50
    REGION VII	 53
    REGION VIII 	 56
    REGION IX 	 58
    REGION X	 64
APPENDICES

I   SUMMARY OF NEJAC ACTIVITIES

II   ACRONYMS USED IN THIS REPORT

III  TIME LINE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ACTIVITIES
ii                    Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
                                    PREFACE
November 1997 will mark the fifth year since the inception of the Office of Environmental
Justice (formerly Office of Environmental Equity) at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA). The office, originally established to conduct education and awareness programs, received
a broader mandate in 1993.  In addition to educating all stakeholders about environmental justice,
the office is charged with developing and implementing a national platform for action. Guided
by the 1994 President's Executive Order on Environmental Justice and stakeholders' advice from
the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council, EPA has evolved a strategy with
commitments to ensure environmental protection for all communities, irrespective of race and/or
income.

The environmental justice movement was started by people, primarily people of color and low-
income communities, who needed to address the inequity of environmental protection services in
their communities.  Grounded in the struggles of the 1960s civil rights movement, these citizens
from every facet of life, emerged to elucidate the environmental inequities facing millions of
people.  These communities rose to articulate and raise concerns about public health threats
posing an immediate danger to the lives of their families, their communities, and themselves.

Environmental justice is about local people facing local problems and designing practical
solutions to address challenging environmental issues.  The environmental justice movement
advocates programs that promote environmental protection within the context of sustainable
development. Utilizing various methods, including traditional knowledge about the ecosystem
and community mobilization, the environmental justice community has become a formidable
force in the protection of both the urban and rural environments.

This report provides an overview of more than four years of EPA's environmental justice
program, with a focus on the successes, failures, and advances towards a more effective program.
The title of the report: "Working Towards Solutions" is suggestive of the fact that, while much
has been accomplished, we at EPA believe that environmental justice is still in its infancy with
respect to its potential impact on EPA's programming for improved quality of life for all
Americans.

EPA continues to seek objective and cost-effective ways of facilitating new stakeholders
approaches, evaluating programs, establishing realistic expectations, and measuring success.
This report is consistent with the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 which is
intended "...to improve public confidence in federal agency performance by holding agencies
accountable for achieving program results...". This report attempts to capture some successful
examples of environmental justice efforts. Without being exhaustive, it focuses on those
initiatives, programs and practices which have had both adverse and positive results on
sustainable economic and environmental  activities.  Beyond highlighting existing Agency
programs and projects, this report outlines major initiatives that were supported by EPA.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997                        Hi

-------
In the final analysis, the success of this office will be demonstrated by its ability to give a voice
to communities who historically were voiceless, and to develop policies which empower local
institutions to address environmental issues, and translate pollution concerns into environmental
regulations to protect the health and safety of all communities including low-income populations
and communities of color.
                                 Clarice E. Gaylord, Ph.D.
                                 Director, Office of Environmental Justice
iv                        Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
                           EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report, "Working Toward Solutions", summarizes environmental justice activities and programs of
the U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As the lead agency under the President's Executive
Order on Environmental Justice, EPA seeks to develop and implement a national objective to ensure that
all people, regardless of race, ethnicity, culture or income status, live in a healthy, safe and sustainable
community.

Implementing environmental justice programs at EPA has required modifying the Agency's approach to
educating its officials to recognize that certain populations who are disproportionately impacted by
environmental pollution are excluded from the decision and policy making process. Achieving a
successful environmental justice program requires the presence of senior management commitment;
environmental justice guidance for all staff; environmental justice training; a cross-media team approach;
coordination with states, Indian tribes, industry, and all stakeholders; resources devoted to program
implementation; systematic review and integration of environmental justice priorities into activities;
establishment of pilot projects; and development of measurement tools for accountability.

The report addresses successful programs as well as present and future challenges. It reviews a number
of environmental assessment methods, including geographic information systems, the  Toxic Release
Inventory, LandView II and the Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis system.  EPA's role in
assisting other federal agencies on environmental justice  issues, federal reinvention initiatives, regional
environmental justice programs and sustainable development is discussed.

The report outlines the role and importance of the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council as a
stakeholder group to give advice and guidance to the Agency on effective environmental justice
strategies. The  Council has had positive influences on how the Agency approaches public policy
development, health and research issues, international concerns, enforcement remedies, and
environmental justice integration into program operations.

Public participation and meaningful involvement are the  cornerstones to effectively address
environmental justice issues. The report describes the Agency's outreach activities to the broadest
audience possible, and pays particular attention to the need to enhance cultural diversity in all phases of
the Agency's operation.

Paramount to resolving local environmental problems is the Agency's effort to support sustainable
economic and redevelopment efforts.  Urban revitalization projects, the Brownfields Initiative, and
Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Communities present opportunities to create jobs and  business
opportunities for communities dealing with urban degradation and blight. Financial and technical
assistance programs have been important efforts in building capacity for stakeholder groups to ensure
fairness and equity under environmental laws.

Protecting public health and safety have taken on a new urgency in high-risk communities. The
Agency's new cumulative exposure project, human exposure assessments, and urban risk assessments
have only recently begun and will continue for many years to evaluate links between toxic exposure and
subsequent health effects in disproportionately affected populations.

Utilization of a  variety of legal and enforcement tools offers one important way for advancing public
policy and practices to ensure that environmental laws are implemented and enforced in low-income
communities  and minority communities. Cases are currently being tried in the courts, administrative

Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997                            v

-------
complaints are being filed with EPA and other agencies, and national policies are being created or
modified. However, success ultimately revolves around mutually acceptable local solutions to local
problems.

On the whole, environmental regulations and enforcement remedies are complex multidimensional
subjects with a matrix of consequences to different communities and populations. One of the challenges
facing the nation is the creation of an acceptable balance between employment-related issues, public
health and welfare issues, and technology and development issues. The people bearing the brunt of
environmental pollution are frequently the voiceless and disadvantaged.
                                                   heWolfRj
       CITIZENS FREQUENTLY DEMONSTRATE THEIR CONCERN THROUGH EFFORTS SUCH AS THIS ONE.
Equity is essential for integration of the aspirations and the hopes of low-income populations and
communities of color, and for promoting the sustainable health of the earth's environment in formulating
regulations and policies that have enduring benefits for all mankind. Recent ecological research and
global meteorological studies show that the earth is a global village. Pollution in one community will
ultimately contribute to the pollution in other communities through the air, the water, and the food chain.
This report seeks to outline efforts to provide environmental justice for all people.
VI
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
                                                                          CHAPTER 1
                                                                           Introduction
Solutions to the disproportionate impact of environmental actions on low-income populations and
communities of color are based on factors that are characteristic of environmental justice. The goal of
environmental justice is to ensure that all people, regardless of race, national origin, or income, are
protected from disproportionately high and adverse impacts to human health and the environment.
Environmental justice communities are generally residents who are of a minority  and/or low-income
group; excluded from the environmental policy setting and/or decision-making process; subject to a
disproportionate impact from one or more environmental hazards; or experience a different
implementation of environmental regulations, requirements, practices and activities in their communities.
Inequality in the application and enforcement of environmental laws and regulations are due to several
factors, such as:

       •   Government officials lack awareness about the disparate levels of
           environmental protection exist in low-income communities and
           communities of color.
       •   Communities most affected by environmental burdens are not included
           in public policy and environmental processes.
       •   Minority and/or low-income communities lack adequate access to public
           information.
       •   Data,  risk, and health effect assessments are not designed to evaluate
           multiple risks, or cumulative and synergistic effects.
       •   Legal tools and enforcement remedies are not effectively used to redress
           environmental inequity problems.
       •   Conditions associated with discrimination in housing, employment, and
           education aggravate disparity.
       •   Urban economic redevelopment programs are inadequate for low-income
           and minority populations; they may heighten environmental problems, as
           well.
       •   Lack of workforce diversity in senior or key management positions in
           federal, state, and local governments.

Chapter 2 focuses on the steps U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other federal agencies
have taken to more effectively address environmental justice concerns.  Subsequent chapters focus on
EPA's outreach efforts to stakeholders; the conduct of environmental assessments; the enhancement of
cultural diversity; support for economic and/or redevelopment efforts; utilization of legislative and
judicial remedies; and concern for the public health and safety of all populations.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
 	CHAPTER 2
  Advancing Environmental Justice in the Federal Government
IMPLEMENTING ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AT EPA
              "EPA is making extra efforts to reach out to communities which may have
              environmental justice concerns to ensure that they are fully informed and
              able to participate in decisions."
                                                 Carol Browner, EPA Administrator
Raising Awareness

To effectively address environmental justice concerns, EPA
has focused on changing the Agency's approach to educating
staff on the importance of recognizing that certain
populations are disproportionately impacted by
environmental pollution and that this affected population also
has been excluded from decision and policy-making
processes. Training courses, workshops, and seminars have
been offered to EPA and other federal, state and local
officials over the last four years. Many environmental justice
awareness training courses have become institutionalized in regional and program offices and are offered
at regular intervals. These courses routinely cover the historical perspective of environmental justice, the
events that led to EPA's involvement and the Agency's responsibility to ensure that fairness and justice
for all populations are integrated into environmental programs, policies and activities.

The goals  of EPA training programs are to make environmental justice an integral part of the day-to-day
activities of each employee. Environmental justice training is multi-media and interdisciplinary,
addressing such issues as air and water regulations, hazardous waste transport, storage and disposal
problems, pesticide and hazardous chemical exposures, public health effects in sensitive populations, and
enforcement and compliance issues. Environmental justice training has been integrated into various
courses, such as, inspector training, public outreach training for Resource Conservation Recovery Act
(RCRA), risk assessment, and enforcement targeting training. A series of environmental justice seminars
are being offered through EPA's National Enforcement Training Institute.  Post course evaluations have
been favorable and staff have acquired a better understanding and awareness of disparate environmental
hazards and their impacts on low-income populations and communities of color.  Environmental justice
concerns are being raised and addressed much more frequently.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
                   ELEMENTS OF SUCCESSFUL ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
                                  PROGRAM INTEGRATION

              1.  Senior management commitment and strategy
              2.  Environmental justice policy directive given to all staff
              3.  Environmental justice training
              4.  Cross media teams approach
              5.  Resources devoted to program implementation
              6.  Systematic review and integration of environmental justice priorities
                  into activities
              7.  Establishment of pilot projects
              8.  Establishment of measurement tools for accountability
Integrating environmental justice within the Agency has been met with varying degrees of success. One
of the first offices to introduce major changes was the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
(OSWER). In 1993, the Assistant Administrator issued a policy statement directing all OSWER staff to
incorporate environmental justice goals in their project formulation and implementation. The Office
established an Environmental Justice Steering Committee, introduced reforms in RCRA and the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) or Superfund
regulation, developed an aggressive public outreach strategy in the Brownfields and Relocation
programs, modified the Superfund technical assistance grants program, and published annual
Environmental Justice Accomplishment Reports.

Other offices and regions that have made
notable changes include the Office of
Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances
(OPPTS) and the Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Assurance (OECA). OPPTS's
cumulative risk assessment studies, the
Worker Protection Standards and other farm
worker outreach issues, the new agricultural
feedlot project, and the Urban Pesticides
programs show special commitment to
environmental justice. In addition, OPPTS has implemented the Lead Residential Demonstration
Initiative to show that an effective, well-planned program can significantly reduce blood-lead levels in
underprivileged children. The Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Roundtable, risk-based targeting
efforts, creative approaches to settlement provisions, and enforcement outreach projects demonstrate
OECA's efforts to  change behavior and practices.  Regional programs and projects are described in
Chapter 8 of this report.

Implementing Institutional Changes Through Executive Order 12898

It is not enough to sensitize EPA staff to environmental justice issues; EPA has to change the way it
conducts business. Changes are necessary to emphasize the role of the affected public in the
environmental process. They need access to accurate, timely information, and to have a fair opportunity
to participate in the development of environmental policies, guidance, and activities.
                                  EnvironmentalJustice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
In 1994, President Clinton issued Executive Order 12898, "Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations," which requires "each federal agency to
make achieving environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate,
disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effects of its programs, policies and
activities  on minority populations and low-income populations." In the memorandum that accompanied
the Order, the President recognized the importance of procedures under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) and directed "each Federal agency to provide opportunities for community input in
the NEPA process, including identifying potential effects and mitigation measures in consultation with
affected communities and improving the accessibility of meetings, crucial documents and notices."

The White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), which has primary oversight of the federal
              "Environmental and civil rights statutes provide many opportunities to
              address environmental hazards in minority communities and low-income
              communities. Application of these existing statutory provisions is an
              important part of this Administration's efforts to prevent those minority
              communities and low-income communities from being subject to
              disproportionately high and adverse environmental effects."

                                       Excerpt from  the Presidential Memorandum for
                                      Executive Order 12898 on Environmental Justice
government's implementation of NEPA, developed a draft "Guidance for Addressing Environmental
Justice under the National Environmental Policy Act" in 1996. While the guidance has not been finalized
to date, the use of NEPA as a tool to consider environmental justice issues, including adverse
socioeconomic and cultural impacts in proposed federal actions, is a major step toward demonstrating the
President's commitment to environmental justice.  An example of the importance of environmental
justice implications in the NEPA process is described in Exhibit 2-1.

                                                                            Exhibit 2-1
                         SOUTH LAWRENCE TRAFFICWAY EXPANSION

               The State of Kansas, with funding from the U.S. Department of Transportation's
               Federal Highway Administration (FHA), proposed to expand a two-lane roadway to
               connect two major interstate highways. The expansion would be adjacent to the
               Haskell Indian Nation's University  in Lawrence, Kansas. Under NEPA, the
               department filed  an Environmental Impact Statement  (EIS)  citing  minimal
               biophysical harm  to the community and surrounding  wetlands.  The  EIS was
               challenged by Haskell students and staff because FHA had not adequately considered
               the highly adverse social impact on the spiritual and cultural use of the land.  A
               Medicine Wheel, sweat lodges, and ancient burial grounds would be impacted by the
               proposed roadway expansion. With the EIS challenged on environmental justice
               grounds, Kansas decided to "de-federalize"the project and FHA withdrew the EIS.
               A grassroots organization comprised of Haskell staff, alumni and students, and local
               residents has filed suit in federal district court on this issue.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
Concurrently with CEQ, EPA drafted its own "Guidance for Incorporating Environmental Justice
Concerns in EPA's NEPA Compliance Analysis." The guidance, issued in 1996, is designed to assist
EPA in developing NEPA compliance documentation on environmental justice concerns. The guidance
addresses key environmental justice terms, illustrates the relevance of environmental justice issues in
environmental analyses, describes methods for communication with the affected population throughout
the NEPA process, and emphasizes environmental justice as a primary consideration to the  NEPA
process.  While these draft documents are being finalized, the principles have begun to impact the NEPA
process.

EPA Reinvention Efforts in Support of Environmental Justice

In 1994, EPA initiated a new Regulatory and Policy Development Process which facilitated the
integration of environmental justice into agency programs.  In response to the National Performance
Review, EPA reformed its rulemaking process by instituting a tiering process whereby high priority,
cross-media policy initiatives would be automatically considered in Agency-wide policy and regulatory
actions. Environmental justice was classified as one of the top priorities by the Administrator and is
routinely analyzed for policy implications or precedents. Because of its priority status, environmental
justice has been integrated into major Agency initiatives, such as the Clean Air Act program, the Worker
Protection Standards, Permits Improvement, RCRA Reforms, and the Relocation Policy.

Conducting Assessments

The Agency has begun to collect data, define terms, and analyze information to determine the factors
associated with high risk exposure to contaminants and to examine whether people of color and low-
income populations are disproportionately impacted by environmental burdens.  Using geographic
information systems (GIS), the Agency analyzes demographic data around specific facilities to assess the
risk to these populations.

Over the last four years, GIS analyses have been conducted to establish methods for identifying areas of
potential concern based on factors such as facility location, Toxic Release Inventory (TRI)  emission
source data, population density, income status, race, ethnicity, and other census block data.  A1995 study
by EPA combined TRI emissions data at the county level with county-level demographic data and noted
possible inequities relative to low-income populations and people of color communities.

An earlier EPA study examined the correlation between concentrations of criteria air pollutants and
demographic characteristics and noted:
               "...Despite the absence of systematically collected data, the weight of the
               available evidence supports two observations. First, many disadvantaged and
               minority groups live in areas with poor outdoor air quality, and these same
               groups may encounter high levels of certain indoor air contaminants (for
               example, aero-allergens, environmental tobacco smoke) in their residences
               and/or workplaces. Second, national data on health status provide clear proof
               that disease and death rates are related to social class and ethnicity/race.  The
               extent to which exposures to air pollutants and other environmental agents
               contribute to these observed differences, however, is uncertain."
                                                                       Ken Sexton
                                             EPA Office of Research and Development
While the GIS technology is being refined, risk-based targeting has only recently emerged as a promising
tool in enforcement to help prioritize efforts to identify releases of chemicals from facilities  and
                                  EnvironmentalJustice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
agricultural activities that may cause disproportionate impacts.  An agency-wide Risk-Based
Identifications Workgroup is developing a discussion paper on technical and policy issues associated
with environmental justice. The paper will help with the design and evaluation of studies that identify
and assess potential adverse environmental and human health impacts.  The paper is expected to be
completed by the end of 1997.

An example of a risk-based targeting project is "Posted Streams" which is designed to screen federal,
industrial, commercial and municipal facilities that contribute chemicals to waterbodies in communities
disproportionately exposed to these chemicals. The results of this  study will be used to initiate  dialogue
with EPA Program and Regional offices to develop enforcement and compliance strategies to minimize
chemical loadings and to reduce human health and aquatic life impacts in these areas.

In another example, the Federal Facilities Enforcement Office (FFEO) is conducting a focused
Environmental Justice Enforcement Initiative at Federal Facilities. This initiative uses the most current
TRI data reported by Federal Facilities coupled with enforcement and compliance data to target facilities
in low-incomes and minority populations for enforcement and compliance actions.  ARCVIEW and
LandView II GIS databases are used to analyze demographic information.  Relative Risk Toxicity
databases developed by OPPTS are used to analyze relative risk of contaminants at the facilities. As a
result of maps generated at sites FFEO can use these documents as tools for planning and targeting
inspections and related enforcement activities at Federal facilities.  This initiative is expected to be a
continuous effort as TRI information is reported annually by Federal facilities.

Recently, several outstanding user-friendly tools have been developed to make data and information more
accessible to the public. For example, LandView n is a software
package available on CD-ROM for use on personal computers.  The
data includes several EPA databases listing thousands of permitted
facilities and Superfund sites, as well as socioeconomic data from the
1990 population census. The information is presented as an
electronic atlas and can be used to help local communities evaluate
environmental risks and identify areas of environmental justice
concern.

LandView II is  an innovative tool that makes it easier for the general
public, the environmental community, local businesses  and government agencies to have access and to
examine "right-to-know" information as part of an assessment of environmental risk and environmental
justice.  With LandView n, the public can locate their own neighborhoods on detailed maps and evaluate
related EPA and census information in the context of their own experience. (See Exhibit 2-2  for an
illustration of a LandView n map.)

Another useful tool is the Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA), an interactive, high speed
data retrieval and integration system that was developed by OECA. The system allows users  to evaluate
current  and historical compliance and enforcement data from all regulated areas, obtain data on specific
facilities, companies or corporations and determine facilities' compliance histories from a multi-media
perspective.

IDEA allows public access to compliance histories and environmental performance for facilities located
or being permitted in certain neighborhoods. Information can be obtained on pollution sources,
monitoring requirements, facility compliance status, spills or accidental releases of hazardous substances
and any significant violator and/or penalty information. The information can give communities and other
stakeholders the ability to track progress and compare enforcement and compliance data on similar
facilities all over the nation.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
Historically, most of EPA's exposure analyses and risk assessments has focused on single pollutants,
single sources and single medium. This methodology does not recognize multiple pathway exposures to
numerous pollutants originating from a variety of sources, particularly in disproportionately exposed
communities. The National Cumulative Exposure Baseline Project originated by the Office of Policy,
Planning and Evaluation is a broad-based examination of human health exposure which considers the
various contributors to exposure in combination. The project's results are intended to enhance the
consideration of cumulative exposure in the development of environmental policy.

The project is developing estimates of cumulative exposures by combining measured and modeled
concentrations of pollutants in air, food and drinking water with human activity and consumption
patterns.  The proposed methodologies rely on existing data and methods, and will estimate national
distributions of exposures across communities and demographic groups.  In addition, the possibility of
developing a multi-pathway exposure distribution, by integrating the results of the inhalation, food
ingestion, and drinking water consumption analyses, will be considered.

The need for additional assessments and effective research is overwhelming. As the Agency deals with
improving data  quality and collection techniques, refining and standardizing definitions and survey
methods, it will continue to investigate class and race differences as it relates to exposure, risk and health
disparities.  In the meantime, additional research needs to be done.
                                  EnvironmentalJustice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
                                                                                Exhibit 2-2
                     • i            .
                      1 .     •      I
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
EPA'S ROLE IN WORKING WITH OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES ON ENVIRONMENTAL
JUSTICE ISSUES

The Agency recognized early that adverse environmental justice impacts were not solely an EPA
responsibility. The Interagency Working Group (IWG) on Environmental Justice, discussed later in the
Chapter, provides a forum for exchanging ideas and sharing experiences across agencies.

Technical Assistance to Other Federal Agencies

Many environmental justice problems cross federal jurisdictional lines.  For instance, many residents
living in highly concentrated industrial centers often complain about the siting of highways, airports, and
other facilities near public or low-income housing units. The residents are often caught in a jurisdictional
maze between various government agencies. One of the important components of implementing
meaningful, significant changes in affected communities is working with other federal agencies.

As the lead Agency identified in Executive Order 12898, EPA manages the IWG.  The IWG, created in
1994, is chaired by Administrator Browner, and comprises the heads of eleven departments/agencies and
several White House offices.

Initially, a structure of eight task forces was established to cover the  following areas:

        •   Research and Health                     -Guidance
        •   Outreach                                •Implementation
        •   Data                                    -Native American Issues
        •   Enforcement and Compliance              •    Interagency Projects

After all required documents were assembled, the individual task forces were disbanded and absorbed
into the Subcommittee on Policy and Coordination. The current IWG is depicted in the following chart.
The Executive Order required two sets of documents from the IWG by April 1995. Each agency
developed a strategic plan to identify and address disproportionately high and adverse human health or
environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations.  The IWG also  submitted a report to the President on interagency environmental justice
accomplishments and projects.  In 1996, most of the task forces were phased out after producing final
products, while other task forces were combined with an ongoing federal initiative. One significance of
the IWG is that the group coordinates activities and shares environmental justice information on a regular
basis.

In 1997, each agency submitted an implementation report on its environmental justice strategies and
participated in coordinated activities which included the review of the CEQ's Draft Environmental
Justice Guidance on NEPA,  the Second Report to the President on Environmental Justice, the Mississippi
Delta Project, the Institute of Medicine's clinical investigation of selected environmental justice
communities in support of the Brownfields and relocation interagency initiatives.
10                                Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
Federal NEPA Oversight
Under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act, EPA has a key role in the overall implementation of NEPA by
other federal agencies.  EPA reviews and provides written comment on the environmental impacts of
proposed federal projects.  In conducting Section 309 reviews, EPA is directed by President Clinton's
accompanying memorandum to Executive Order 12898 to ensure that agencies fully analyze the
environmental effects of proposed actions on minority and low-income communities, including human
health, social and economic effects.

EPA seeks to identify possible environmental justice concerns and offer alternative solutions or
mitigation measures for unavoidable impacts. EPA works with other federal departments and agencies to
ensure that environmental justice issues are addressed in their actions.  While Section 309 gives EPA the
ability to review other proposed federal actions, difficulties may arise regarding the integration of
Executive Order 12898 with existing statutory authorities of other agencies.  For example, problems
occurred most recently with attempts to factor adverse social impacts into the NEPA review of mining
practices on tribal lands under the 1872 Mining laws.  Thus, a major challenge for the effective
implementation of E.G. 12898 is to identify effective ways to integrate the Order in specific cases.

Regional Environmental Justice Interagency Groups

Just as the EPA Environmental Justice Office interacts with other departments and agencies through the
formal Interagency Working Group, EPA encourages its ten regional offices to form similar groups at the
regional level to identify roles and opportunities  for federal offices to work together in field situations.
Region VIII convened a Denver area Environmental Justice Interagency Task Force to initiate a dialogue
with its local "federal family" to discuss common issues and  to develop a shared vision to address public
land management issues, conduct federal environmental justice training, and outreach to urban, rural and
tribal stakeholders.

Federal Reinvention Initiatives and Environmental Justice

One effort that emerged from the government reinvention process was the "Common Sense Initiative".
The strategy analyzes pollution on an industry-by-industry basis rather than using the pollutant-by-
pollutant approach of the past.  The "Initiative" tailors environmental protection policies to specific
industries and involves teams of individuals  from manufacturers to community organizations in
fashioning new strategies and approaches that emphasize pollution prevention while providing cheaper,
cleaner  and  smarter protection for everyone.
                                  Interagency Working Group on
                                      Environmental Justice
                                    Chair:  EPA Administrator
                            Cabinet Secretaries of DOC, DOD,  DOE, DOI,
                              DOJ, DOL, DOT, HHS, HUD, and  USDA
                                    Heads of CEA, CEQ, DPC,
                                 OMB, OSTP, NRC, NASA, FEMA
                        Subcommittee on Policy and Coordination Task Force
                            Co-Chairs from Agencies and Representatives
                         from White House Offices and Independent Agencies
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997
11

-------
The Initiative started by focusing on six pilot industries: iron and steel; electronics and computers; metal
plating and finishing; automobile assembly; printing; and oil refining. Together, these industries account
for one-eighth of all toxic emissions reported to EPA and are frequently located in low-income and
people of color communities.

The teams are reviewing regulations to obtain better environmental results at less cost through increased
coordination; seeking opportunities to give industry the incentives and flexibility to develop innovative
technologies that meet and exceed environmental standards while cutting costs; looking at ways to
change the permitting process; creating opportunities for public participation; and improving
environmental reporting requirements.

While the Initiative is targeted toward the industrial sector, it does benefit environmental justice
communities by requiring these industries to create and enhance opportunities for public participation in
their operations.  However, one of the lessons learned from this approach is that more effort needs to be
made to ensure that the public has an early, meaningful and significant involvement in the process.

Our Common Future and Sustainable Development

The Brundtland Report describes "sustainable development" as a process which allows people "...to meet
the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."
The integration of economic, political and environmental factors  is the essential catalyst for ensuring that
local populations have the inter-generational resources to face future challenges.  In this regard, the
Agency has a number of programs in place to encourage local community organizations and other
stakeholder groups to develop comprehensive strategies that incorporate sustainable economic
development with sound environmental practices.

Pollution prevention promotes development of technologies and practices that prevent pollution. EPA is
working with all stakeholders to help communities deal with emerging environmental issues by using
pollution prevention, rather than simply pollution and waste control solutions. Pollution prevention
seeks to reduce or eliminate pollutants before treatment or disposal. It is also commonly referred to as
"source reduction." EPA further defines pollution prevention as the use of other practices that reduce or
eliminate the creation of pollutants through 1) increased efficiency in the use of raw materials, energy,
water, or other resources, and 2) protection of natural resources by conservation.
12                                Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
                        	CHAPTER  3
                         Increasing Public Participation and Outreach
              " The integration of environmental justice into everything that our country
              does domestically and internationally can be the most important thing our
              government has ever done to make development sustainable."
                        Baldemar Velasquez, Chair, NEJAC International Subcommittee
THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVISORY COUNCIL
To ensure that EPA was obtaining adequate stakeholder advice and making appropriate changes as it
implemented a national environmental justice program, the agency chartered the National Environmental
Justice Advisory Council (NEJAC) in 1993. The Council, which is governed by the Federal Advisory
Committee Act, provides independent advice to EPA on all matters relating to environmental justice. It
consists of 25 members appointed from stakeholder groups including community-based organizations;
business and industry; academic and educational institutions; state and local government agencies; tribal
government  and community groups; non-governmental organizations and environmental groups. (See
Appendix I for charter membership).

Since its inception in September 1993, NEJAC has met eight times, sponsored a number of significant
events, and produced a variety of reports and products to help EPA focus its environmental justice action
efforts.
                      SIGNIFICANT EVENTS ACCOMPLISHED BY NEJAC

              1.   Reviewed and helped to finalize EPA's Environmental Justice Strategy
                  and Implementation Plan
              2.   Provided guidance on both CEQ's and EPA's Draft Environmental
                  Justice Guidance for NEPA
              3.   Hosted five Brownfields Public Dialogue Sessions and produced a report
              4.   Conducted the agency's first public Roundtables—one on Relocation in
                  Pensacola, Florida and one on Enforcement in San Antonio, Texas
                  (proceedings from both meetings were published)
              5.   Developed and published a Model Plan for Enhancing Public
                  Participation in  environmental activities which was adopted by EPA and
                  other federal agencies as the guide for conducting public meetings
              6.   Produced a report on the Enforcement Subcommittee's review of OECA
                  programs
              7.   Submitted a paper on environmental justice opportunities in the
                  permitting process
              8.   Produced a paper evaluating EPA's process under Title VI of the Civil
                  Rights Act of 1964
              9.   Reviewed RCRA's technical location standards and facility siting
                  criteria
              10.  Developed recommendations for health and research projects that have
                  application to high risk communities (for example, lead and mercury
                  poisoning in environmental justice communities)
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997
13

-------
The Council has six subcommittees organized around themes to help develop strategic options for EPA.
The subcommittees are:  1) Enforcement, 2) Health and Research, 3) Indigenous Peoples, 4) International
Activities, 5) Public Participation and Accountability, and 6) Waste and Facility Siting.  The
subcommittees are co-sponsored by various program offices to ensure that specific program needs are
met and that advice is received from all stakeholders on relevant environmental justice issues and
effectively integrated into appropriate agency areas.  Each subcommittee is sponsored by an EPA
Program Office as shown below:
       Enforcement
       Health/Research

       Indigenous
       International
       Public Participation
       Waste/Facility Siting
Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA)
Office of Research & Development and Office of Prevention, Pesticides
& Toxic Substances
American Indian Environmental Office, Office of Water
Office of International Activities
Office of Environmental Justice, OECA
Office of Solid Waste & Emergency Response
NEJAC's involvement in the Brownfields initiative and the Relocation Roundtable have had a major
impact on new policy implications for environmental justice communities.  (An example is found in
Exhibit 3-1 on the following page)

The NEJAC makes a concerted effort to obtain information from the public and other stakeholder groups
by scheduling public comment periods during their meetings and by conducting site tours of affected
communities to their schedule. NEJAC finds it helpful to speak to residents and to see first-hand the
condition of the environment. To ensure the use of appropriate techniques to involve communities in
environmental discussions, NEJAC's Subcommittee on Public Participation and Accountability
developed and widely distributed its "Model Plan for Public Participation" as a template for groups
trying to  conduct effective public meetings.  The plan has been successfully implemented in seven public
meetings and roundtables co-sponsored by EPA and NEJAC.  The NEJAC continues to enhance the
public's access  to information through their Internet site at http://www.ttemi.com/nejac.  The NEJAC
Internet site is electronically linked to all EPA Internet sites regarding environmental justice issues.

                                                                          Exhibit 3-1
                                NATIONAL RELOCATION PILOT

              As a result of testimony given at a NEJAC Council meeting and a NEJAC public
              roundtable on Relocation, a predominantly black, low-income community of 358
              residents is being relocated in Pensacola, Florida.  The  families live in close
              proximity to a toxic waste site leaching dioxin, arsenic, lead and other contaminants.
              The relocation site will be cleaned up, redeveloped and rezoned by the city for non-
              residential use. The Pensacola Relocation pilot will serve as a national model and
              has wide-ranging implications for modifying the agency's  current policy on
              relocation.
ENHANCING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND OUTREACH

The success of any local environmental program depends on the early, meaningful involvement of an
educated public. Special training programs must be developed for citizens and other stakeholders.
Assuming that government officials, business and industry staff are conversant with environmental
regulations, EPA concentrates on providing training to high risk communities on the role they could play
in the environmental decision-making process at the local, county, state and federal government levels.
Communities need to know how to exercise their rights and responsibilities under current environmental
laws, guidance and policies in order to effectively interact with government agencies.
14
     EnvironmentalJustice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
Once empowered, communities are in a better position to negotiate with other stakeholders for an
improved quality of life and healthy sustainable environment. (The profile of an empowered community
appears below).

Awareness training also was offered to the public to aid in their understanding of the diverse issues
associated with environmental justice.  To reach a wide audience, the Agency partially supported an
environmental justice presentation in collaboration with Tuft's University Drama Department and
Boston's Underground Railway Theater group.  The presentation went on national tour in 1994-1995
performing to audiences in Boston, Washington, D.C., Chicago and New York. The presentation
received rave reviews  as it educated, enlightened and sensitized people to the importance of providing
environmental protection to everyone.  Post production audience participation, discussions, and
evaluation surveys emphasized the effectiveness of this project as an educational tool.  The Agency
utilized a variety of methods to train and educate the public about environmental justice issues.
However, the Agency's workforce must reflect the diversity of American society in order to adequately
achieve our environmental mission. To achieve this goal, several programs are important.
                                  AFFECTED COMMUNITIES
                     VULNERABLE
   EMPOWERED
                  1.  Unaware of rights and process
                  2.  Unorganized
                  3.  No representation
                  4.  Limited access to information
                  5.  Uninvolved
1.  Environmentally literate
2.  Organized
3.  Champion/steward
4.  Access to public databases
5.  Community-Right-to-Know
                  6.  Pollution sources increase 6. Pollution Prevention
                  7.  Unwilling to partner             7. Partners with stakeholders
ENHANCING CULTURAL DIVERSITY

The Agency has a number of ongoing programs to help diversify the workforce and to help encourage
students to enter the environmental field. Programs such as The East St. Louis Citizen's Academy and
the Environmental Careers Organization's Internships help overcome barriers to ensuring cultural
diversity in environmental policy and decision-making by increasing opportunities for students to pursue
environmental degrees and/or careers. This special training program has successfully empowered
hundreds of residents and increased citizen's participation on local, public and private advisory boards.

Since 1992, EPA has created and participated in a program through the Environmental Careers
Organization to place over 2,000 students into paid internships at all EPA facilities, including program
and regional offices as well as laboratories. A widely diverse  group of student interns, gained valuable
environmental training, research and field work experiences as well as interacting with community-based
organizations. Surveys of former interns have shown that the  internship experience has been worthwhile
and has encouraged many of the students to pursue studies in the environmental field.

Under a special internship program, over 80 students were directly sponsored by the Office of
Environmental Justice and placed in Regional offices to provide direct technical assistance to local
communities working on environmental education or community improvement projects such as
community cleanups, pollution prevention training, lead, and asthma awareness projects and
environmental education outreach efforts. These programs have provided a diverse cross-section of
youth with significant environmental work experience, inculcation of environmental ethics and
appreciation for the factors which contribute to  safe, healthy sustainable communities.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997
                                          15

-------
                                                                            Exhibit 3-2
                           THE EAST ST. LOUIS CITIZEN'S ACADEMY

               To build local capacity and to empower local citizens to become involved in local
               environmentalprocesses andpublic meetings, Region 5 createda Citizen's Academy
               in conjunction with the State Community College of East St. Louis. Citizens are
               offered seven weeks of free training seminars held on Saturday mornings. Topics of
               the seminars include environmental laws and regulations. As a part of the training
               program, students are given opportunities to participate in mock public hearings.
               Upon leaving the academy, students are placed on a mailing list, and notified of all
               local hearings and pending legislation. Many are nominated for membership on
               community advisory boards for local government and industry. Graduates of this
               program have a much better understanding of the enforcement and permitting
               processes and their role in resolving local environmental issues.
Minority Academic Institutions, which are working on environmental issues, are an important resource
for designing and implementing community-based environmental activities in underserved communities.
Many of these institutions have relationships with distressed communities and require students to
participate in community service before graduation. Most schools also have active community outreach
programs. When EPA created the Academic Relations Program in 1990, it included colleges and
universities, with close ties to the communities, such as Historically Black Colleges and Universities,
Hispanic Serving Institutions and campuses with a significant Asian or American Indian population to
help meet the Agency's research, environmental and scientific needs. The Agency's formal program,
which does not involve quotas, has been effective in providing technical and financial assistance to help
build environmental capacity in these institutions  and to mobilize all students, faculty and communities
around environmental issues.

In 1990, in an effort to heighten environmental awareness in these communities, EPA's Office of Water
established the "Youth and the Environment Initiative" to introduce low-income urban and rural youth to
career opportunities in the environmental field by
combining summer employment with academic training
and hands-on experience.  To expose students to the
many various environmental career possibilities, the
program provides a blueprint for establishing awareness
and training in  such fields as water supply, wastewater
treatment, recycling, energy, marine  environments,
environmental justice,  hazardous waste and natural
resources protection.

To date, approximately 900 students in more than 25
cities have participated in the program.  The program runs
six to eight weeks, allowing students the opportunity to
assist plant operators in day-to-day wastewater plant
operations, including routine monitoring and laboratory
analysis, plant operations, inspections,  maintenance and
safety assurance. Several students are now pursuing engineering or environmental science degrees while
others are currently employed  full time at the local wastewater treatment facility.

In addition to encouraging cultural diversity externally, the Agency is committed to efforts to expand its
internal workforce diversity particularly in senior management positions and to improve environmental
16
EnvironmentalJustice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
justice training for all managers. Such training is vital if EPA is to recognize and utilize talents within
the workforce and to better communicate with all communities.

                                                                           Exhibit 3-3
                               BALTIMORE'S YOUTH WARRIORS

              Youth Warriors is an environmental justice organization that educates and trains
              minority youth and young adults ages 14-30 on environmental, economic and social
              problems that affect Baltimore community residents. Each youth undergoes a seven-
              month apprenticeship that provides urban environmental  education and training,
              leadership development and organizing skills. The program requires the completion
              of community service projects that address enhancing environmental quality in
              environmental justice communities.
Since the environmental justice movement began, organizations such as the Baltimore Youth Warriors
(See Exhibit 3-3) have been established to get youth and young adults interested in environmental issues
and involved in activities to improve the environmental quality of their neighborhoods. This program
encourages young people to volunteer their time to community services and help them to gain valuable
field experience and reinforce environmental career interests.

OUTREACH EFFORTS
In partnership with the Smithsonian Institute's Museum of
American History, EPA initiated an Environmental Justice
Distinguished Lecture Series from 1994 to 1995. The
Series of six lectures covered issues ranging from disparate
pollution exposure to environmental problems in Indian
country, occupational hazards for Asian electronic and
garment workers, and environmental contamination along
the U.S./Mexican Border. Evaluations from this series  also
indicated the public's appreciation of these lectures as a
training vehicle.
The Agency continues to fund a series of environmental
justice public service announcements on the national
Hispanic Network Radio.  These broadcasts provide pertinent information in Spanish on issues, such as
the Worker Protection Standards, lead paint testing and abatement programs, radon testing, asthma
management training for Hispanic children and technical assistance opportunities for communities.

Access to quality and accurate information is key to the public's meaningful participation in
environmental decision-making. Citizens need user-friendly, non-technical, current information about
the effects of pollution; the success of mitigation strategies for communities; new policy and regulatory
developments; upcoming public hearings; and  grant opportunities. To make the latest information more
accessible to all stakeholders, the Office of Environmental Justice created a homepage on the Internet,
expanded the availability of program information and established a hot-line number (800-962-6215).
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997
17

-------
               "...EPA is promoting consensus-based approaches to the remedy selection
              process by involving community stakeholders in site pilot projects. This effort
               is intended to empower local citizens and other stakeholders to be involved in
               the remedy selection process that ultimately results in EPA choosing common
               sense remedies that meet statutory and regulatory requirements."
                                                    Carol Browner, EPA Administrator
Since 1994 more than 5,000 calls have been received from community groups and individuals requesting
information and assistance on a variety of issues ranging from pesticide misuse to local facility siting,
enforcement questions and water quality problems.  In addition, the Office maintains and updates
brochures, fact sheets, reports and community education materials. Selected documents are available in
Spanish, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Korean.
18
EnvironmentalJustice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
                         	CHAPTER 4
                          Supporting Economic/Redevelopment Efforts
FORMING PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: CASE STUDIES

In urban areas throughout the nation, minority and low-income residents are exposed to a multitude of
environmental hazards, ranging from lead paint, waste facilities, industrial pollution, auto emissions to
unhealthy indoor air.  Cumulatively, the effects of these hazards upon residents, particularly  sensitive
populations such as children and the elderly, are compounded by other economic and social ills which
aggravate these health risks.

Major goals of the Agency have been to cleanup contaminated sites, reduce toxic exposure and minimize
related public health problems in high-risk urban communities. The best approach in reaching this goal
has been to develop a variety of targeted urban revitalization plans that involve all stakeholders.  A
number of different projects  have been tried and appear to be successful in meeting this goal.

New England Urban Environmental Initiative

EPA's Region I office identified urban environments in Boston, Massachusetts, Hartford, Connecticut,
and Providence, Rhode Island as Initiative projects. Its approach has been to address priority
environmental and public health issues in targeted neighborhoods and conduct pilot efforts such as
restoration of urban river quality, lead poisoning prevention and mitigation, reduction of environmental
factors which affect respiratory functions and restoring contaminated land and vacant lots. Through
these pilots, local infrastructures have been built, partnerships with diverse stakeholders have been
established and model programs which can be replicated in other disadvantaged urban areas have been
initiated.

Boston's Community Gardening Project

A year after EPA Region I, AmeriCorp and the Dudley Street Neighborhood Initiative worked on
revitalizing and cleaning up a vacant lot in Boston, the property has now been taken over by the Food
Project for use as a vegetable and fruit garden. Food from the garden is used to supply homeless shelters
and sold in a farmer's market starting in the Spring 1997. The effort has been so successful that other
agencies such as the Department of Agriculture are interested in supporting similar projects in other EPA
target cities.

Providence Vacant Lot Task Force

EPA has been working with  14 community organizations and the City of Providence to identify the
history of 3500 vacant lots in Providence used as dumpsites and to find ways of salvaging these sites. As
a result of this effort, the Mayor's  Office created a City Conservation Corp for the cleanup of vacant lots.
Since April 1996, 216 vacant lots have been cleaned and EPA has arranged for American National
Service Corps members to provide additional manpower.

Hartford Environmental Project

EPA is working with ONE/CHANE, residents of North Hartford, the State of Connecticut, the City of
Hartford and local businesses and  industry to conduct environmental assessments and inventory of
potential  sources of environmental contamination and to gather health data in the Hartford urban area.
Over 120 local residents have been trained to use computer systems and become a part of the computer
input registry for geographic information systems (GIS) environmental database systems. This project

Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997                              19

-------
aids the community's effort to perform their own GIS mapping functions. Residents are currently
assessing the site of a contaminated former car wash facility for possible redevelopment as a local
supermarket or drug store.

EPA'S BROWNFIELDS ECONOMIC REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE

EPA's OSWERis exploring economic
redevelopment opportunities in the context of
Superfund cleanups as a complement to
environmental justice initiatives in low-income and
minority communities. This initiative is focused on
abandoned Brownfields, idle or under-used industrial
and commercial facilities where expansion or
redevelopment is complicated by environmental
contamination, uncertainty about future liabilities
and potential cleanup costs.

Restoring contaminated urban property is viewed as
a way to bring life and economic vitality back to
disadvantaged urban communities. OSWER's
initiative is aimed at empowering states,
communities, industries and local governments to work together to assess, cleanup and reuse
Brownfields.  The program helps reverse contamination, declining property values and high
unemployment often found in urban industrial areas.  Thus far, EPA has awarded 45 Brownfields Pilot
Cooperative Agreements to states, cities, towns, counties and tribes. The pilots, each funded up to
$200,000 over two years, are established to work in partnership with communities to develop strategies
for reuse of the Brownfield sites.

EMPOWERMENT ZONE/ENTERPRISE COMMUNITIES (EZ/EC)

The Federal Government developed the Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Communities (EZ/EC) program
in 1992 to empower communities to work together with federal, state and local officials to create jobs
and business opportunities and to develop strategic plans for urban and rural revitalization. In 1993,
President Clinton created a Community Enterprise Board which directed 13 agencies to further the goals
of economic redevelopment and make shared resources available to implement approved revitalization
plans. As an active member of the Board, EPA's Brownfields pilots are considered the framework for
successful EZ/EC projects in clarifying liability issues, supporting community partnerships, conducting
outreach activities and addressing environmental justice concerns. To date, more than 50% of the
Brownfields pilots have been designated as EZ/EC communities.  Revitalization efforts are ongoing in
cities such as Los Angeles, New York, Cleveland, and Chicago where large environmental justice
communities reside.

COMMUNITY-BASED LEAD ABATEMENT DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS

In 1992, EPA in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and
the District of Columbia Government initiated a pilot Residential Lead Training Initiative for citizens
residing in low-income Anacostia public housing units. The purpose of the program was to train and hire
unemployed and underemployed public housing residents in lead and asbestos inspection, abatement and
remediation.  These skills  could be used to abate housing of hazardous environmental contaminants,
improve environmental quality and create employment opportunities for residents.
20
EnvironmentalJustice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
In 1994, as a result of the success of this pilot, EPA's
Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances, in
partnership with HUD, the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services (DHHS), and the U.S. Department of
Labor (DOL) launched a national Community-Based Lead
Abatement Demonstration Project in six cities.  The
selected cities of Philadelphia, Chicago, Milwaukee,
Missoula, Memphis and Oakland were awarded an average
of $300,000 per year to train and hire residents from poor
urban or rural communities in lead abatement. Since
initiation of these demonstration projects, lower lead levels
have been found in children living in these disadvantaged
areas and the economic viability of the community
residents has improved through abatement training and employment.

One truly innovative economic revitalization model has been developed by the Clinton Administration
and administered by Cornell University's School of Business. The concept of a self-contained
ecologically sound industrial park has been tested in Baltimore, Maryland; Chicago, Illinois;
Chattanooga, Tennessee; Cape Charles, Virginia;  and Brownsville, Texas. The project calls for public
participation in the design of the parks and in the implementation of the project. See Exhibit 4-1 below
for a description. For more  information, you may visit the project's Internet site at
http://www.sustainable.doe.gov/industrial/.
                                                                           Exhibit 4-1
                                    ECO-INDUSTRIAL PARKS

               The concept of an environmentally sound industrial park links businesses together
               in a symbiotic way utilizing a closed loop production  and operation system that
               reduces waste and minimizes environmental degradation.  Businesses in the eco-
               industrial park (EIP) are selected and contiguously located to share resources to the
               maximum extent possible. Raw materials and other resources are used frugally,
               waste is minimized, by-products from one company are recycled as raw material for
               other companies in the park and residual wastes are managed in a safe and usable
               manner.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997
21

-------
                                        	CHAPTER 5
                                         Building Capacity for Stakeholders
To deal effectively with environmental justices issues, stakeholders need to have the capacity and
infrastructure to assess, manage and take part in resolving their environmental problems. EPA initiated a
number of financial and technical assistance programs to aid local communities, tribal and community-
based organizations and other stakeholders in developing effective means of addressing environmental
concerns.

GRANTS PROGRAM

In 1993, EPA created the Environmental Justice Small Grants program to provide financial assistance to
community-based organizations that were working on local solutions to local environmental problems.
The program was designed to enable grassroots groups, community-based organizations, churches,
schools, non-profit organizations, tribal communities and governments to identify and assess pollution
sources. In addition, the grants program, and environmental awareness and training programs are
structured to devise strategies for improvements to the environment.

Grants to Community Organizations

Since 1993, over $7 million in grant awards of $20,000 have been made to approximately 500 local
community recipients. Grant recipients are addressing, among other issues, childhood lead poisoning,
asthma management in children, radon testing in low-income homes, fish contamination in subsistence
populations, water quality and pesticide issues in rural communities. Funding has been provided to
initiate information exchange programs, facilitate  communications and partnerships among affected
stakeholders and to teach risk reduction, pollution prevention and source reduction technologies in
distressed communities.

In a recent audit of the Environmental Justice Small Grants program, EPA's Inspector General's Office
found that, while the program needed better control and accountability measures, the  overall program
was working well. In addition, the audit identified several success stories resulting from the national
program. Examples include:

       •   Region I grantee determined that for one housing development, 60% of the
           families had at least one family member plagued with asthma. The work
           identified important issues which required further study by EPA scientists in
           coordination with Health and Human  Services and Housing and Urban
           Development.

       •   In Region IE, a university conducted a project that trained local community
           members to test for and cleanup lead debris and dust. The project successfully
           reduced lead contamination in the homes of community residents, thereby
           reducing  exposure to vulnerable children.

       •   In Region V, universities conducted training workshops for 450 Cambodian,
           Hmong and Laotian residents on ways to reduce levels of lead, radon, carbon
           monoxide and moisture/molds in indoor home environments.

While the small grants program in general has been considered successful and invaluable to groups who
traditionally have not been eligible for financial assistance programs, more emphasis  needs to be invested
in "grantsmanship" training, monitoring and controls to ensure that the program runs  optimally. In the


Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997                               23

-------
meantime, the program concept is being duplicated by other EPA offices, other federal agencies and
outside funding entities such as the American Association for the Advancement of Sciences.

Community-University Partnership Grants

In 1995, the Office of Environmental Justice created the Community/University Partnership (CUP) grants
program to help community groups more efficiently and effectively address local environmental justice
issues through active partnerships with institutions of higher education. Under this program, a
meaningful interactive cooperation has been established between communities and colleges or
universities to focus on areas of major concern. Sixteen CUP pairs have been awarded approximately
$4.5 million in amounts of $250,000 each to help communities become actively engaged in accessing
information from public databases, in cleaning up and restoring neighborhoods with environmental
problems, in surveying and monitoring environmental quality, and empowering communities to learn and
participate in public environmental processes. These projects have already been successful in increasing
environmental awareness, expanding community outreach, and training stakeholder groups to effectively
address and resolve local environmental problems. (See Exhibit 5-1  for an example of a successful CUP
grant.)

To provide additional financial assistance to small community groups and tribal governments, EPA's
Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances developed the Environmental Justice Through
Pollution Prevention Grants program to help communities focus on projects designed to address
environmental justice problems using pollution prevention remedies. The program has funded projects
that encourage institutionalization and innovative use of pollution prevention as the preferred approach
for addressing disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental impacts in low-
income and communities of color.

Cooperative efforts with business and industry to address common source reduction goals are a priority
in this program.
                                                                           Exhibit 5-1
                                HOSTOS COMMUNITY COLLEGE

               The collaboration between Hostos  Community  College and the South Bronx
               Community Advisory Board is addressing the degrading environmental conditions
               of a culturally mixed, predominantly working class community. With a population
               of 1,200,000 residents (77% minority) this county has the highest percentage of
               waste facilities and the highest percentage of asthma related deaths and illnesses in
               the New York city area. The project developed a more systematic, comprehensive
               approach to environmental and public health assessments, remediation and urban
               planning.  Community-based Geographic  Information System (GIS) maps were
               created pinpointing pollution sources,  population density and complaints and
               enforcement analysis for each neighborhood. Community-Right-to-Act teams were
               created and train-the-trainer programs were initiated to develop pollution prevention
               and resource conservation activities within the community. Residents were also
               assisted in efforts to develop small businesses in compliance with the City's urban
               development plans.
Similar financial assistance has been offered to community-based organizations and tribal governments
through the Office of Environmental Education.  The objective of this grants program is to support
environmental education programs that enhance critical thinking and problem solving skills to ensure
informed, responsible decisions to protect public health and the environment. As the Agency develops
more of these types of grants for the non-traditional grant applicant, it will discover the value of
24
EnvironmentalJustice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
providing assistance to community-based organizations to help them learn about environmental processes
and develop strategies to help themselves.

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS

EPA has initiated programs to provide technical assistance to underserved communities.  In 1996, the
Agency encouraged collaborative projects between AmeriCorp volunteers and environmental justice
communities.  The National Civilian Community Corps (NCCC), an AmeriCorp program, is a federally
funded program designed to promote community service among young adult volunteers who have
pledged to improve the quality of life and public safety for all communities. Corps members live on
military bases  and are deployed as teams to conduct community service activities across the country.

In 1996, Regions I, IE, and IX used NCCC volunteers to help communities revitalize vacant lots, cleanup
polluted urban streams and restore water resources quality. A NCCC team working in the Anacostia
section of the District of Columbia conducted an eight-week aquatics life training program for low-
income students living in the area. Participants were acquainted with the adverse effects of pollutants on
aquatic life in  the Anacostia River and how to avoid practices which contribute to the pollution load.
Additionally, participants were taught about Community-Right-to-Know Act provisions and given
technical assistance on how to access information to monitor the quality of the river.

In furtherance  of the Technical Assistance Program, the American Bar Association (ABA) published in
1996 a Directory of Pro Bono Legal Service Providers for Environmental Justice.  The directory provided
information about law school programs, non-profit organizations, law firms and legal services offices
that offer free  legal services to communities on environmental justice matters. The directory, resulting
from a national survey conducted by the ABA in 1993, confirmed the paucity of legal services in low-
income and communities of color on environmental issues.
              " ... we have to bear our responsibility, and our responsibility is not to let
              somebody define whatever the issues are for us, but, in fact, that we are the
              ones that need to do that for ourselves."
                                                      Richard Moore, Chair, NEJAC
While the number of technical and financial assistance programs to communities and other stakeholders
affected by environmental justice issues has increased over the last four years, there are concerns that
financial assistance to citizens is misdirected and that opportunities for the misuse of funds should pose a
concern. The recent Inspector General's national audit of the environmental justice small grants program
does not bear this out. If EPA and the nation is serious about involving the public in the environmental
process, adequate resources will be required to accomplish this goal.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997                                25

-------
                                                        	CHAPTER 6
                                                         Protecting Public Health
The Agency's traditional approach to health and research investigation had to be re-examined as EPA
incorporates environmental justice issues.  The concept of low-level, chronic, and cumulative exposure to
multiple pollutants had to be factored into how EPA determines risk in susceptible and vulnerable
populations.

For years, the disparity between minority health status and the general population
has been well documented.  Higher incidences of hypertension, diabetes, infant
mortality, respiratory illnesses, liver disease and most forms of cancer have been
attributed to differences in lifestyles, nutrition, access to health care services,
environmental factors, genetics, etc. Prior to 1990 at EPA, one area that had been
given minimal attention was the possible correlation between disease etiology and
chronic, low-level exposure to multiple environmental contaminants from different
sources. Environmental justice concerns have raised the level of awareness  about
these possible cumulative and synergistic connections. Academic studies on the
demographics of environmental justice and the relationship to health status are
inconclusive.
CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

From a regulatory perspective, good epidemiological data disaggregated by race and income groups and
correlated to environmental exposure and health effects were not widely available. Thus, clinical
investigations like the Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry's (ATSDR) Mississippi Delta
Project should provide valuable information regarding the concentration of toxicants in air, water and
soils and possible adverse health effects amongst the 8.3 million residents living along this low-income,
highly industrialized area.

The Mississippi Delta Project was initiated in 1995 as a collaborative effort among several federal
agencies, state health and environmental departments, community organizations and academic
institutions including Historically Black Colleges and Universities. The goal of the project is to identify
environmental hazards, promote environmental quality, reduce and, where possible, prevent these
hazards from affecting public health and the environment, with emphasis on disproportionately affected
communities.
              " ... in order to get to "sound science," we have to change the way we look at
              these issues, and we have to talk about exposure, the actual exposure that
              people are dealing with as opposed to the potential for risk..."
                              Deeohn Ferris, Chair, Enforcement Subcommittee, NEJAC
In 1996, the National Academy of Science's Institute of Medicine launched a study to examine disease
patterns in people of color and low-income communities with known high environmental exposures. The
study is looking at diverse population groups residing in urban centers, rural communities and Native
American reservations. Targeted, broad-based epidemiologic studies coupled with improved techniques
to monitor and assess cumulative exposures will be useful in sorting out the many factors related to
health risks.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997
27

-------
URBAN RISK ASSESSMENTS

EPA has a number of ongoing urban risk assessment projects such as Region V's Chicago Cumulative
Risk Initiative and Region Ill's Chester Risk Assessment Project. In both studies, the Regions are
working with the local governments and state health departments to study relationships between
environmental risks, health and regulatory compliance and enforcement issues.  Utilizing exposure data
for all media and various pathways, reports of aggregated risk are analyzed largely because of the
unknown nature of interrelated environmental exposures. Preliminary findings are showing unacceptably
high levels of blood lead in children, some health risks from consuming contaminated fish and the
incidence rates for certain types of cancer are significantly above the statewide rates in
disproportionately exposed groups.

Baltimore Urban Environmental Risk Initiative

EPA's Region III Office is working in cooperation with the
Maryland Department of the Environment, the Baltimore
City Health Department and the Baltimore City Planning
Department to identify and rank areas  of disproportionate
risk in the city for purposes of implementing risk reduction,
pollution prevention, public awareness and other activities to
eliminate, or at least minimize risks. Projects have been
designed to address environmental concerns in the areas of
lead, hazardous materials incidents, indoor air quality, fish
consumption in the Harbor, ground level ozone pollution and
air toxins.

Since 1990, lead awareness and lead hazard reduction training have been provided to more than 2300
residents in at-risk areas of Baltimore  City.  Training has been provided to Baltimore city public school
technicians in the areas of heating, ventilation and air conditioning. This training is  intended to help
improve indoor air quality by improving the efficiency and operation of school heating and cooling
systems. A system to inventory and maintain a hazardous waste database for businesses in the city was
developed in conjunction with the Baltimore City Fire Department.

An Ozone Pollution alert program is broadcast by local Baltimore TV stations as part of a weather
forecast to provide at-risk citizens with air quality information. A comprehensive fish consumption
survey of subsistence fishermen in Baltimore Harbor helped develop effective outreach strategies and
provide valid fish consumption data for risk estimates.

Human Exposure Assessment Projects

The National Human Exposure Assessment Survey is an ongoing field study in Maryland conducted by
EPA's Office of Research and Development (ORD). The research has as its goal the determination of
human exposure to environmental pollutants. The study is being conducted in collaboration with Johns
Hopkins, Emory and Harvard Universities and should provide valuable human environmental exposure
data that will be useful for risk evaluation and exposure assessment.

In a complementary human exposure study,  ORD is conducting a project targeted at the U.S./Mexico
border communities to establish a database on environmental exposure and health risks in these
predominantly low-income populations.  The Agency is collaborating with local, state and federal
agencies to resolve environmental health risk problems in these border communities. Research is being
conducted to improve our understanding of exposure to environmental pollutants experienced by
residents along the border and to understand the pathways and sources of these exposures.  The data will


28                               Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
be analyzed to determine the health risks posed by these exposures and the information will be used, in
partnership with the communities, to develop educational, training and pollution prevention/reduction
programs to reduce such exposures.

To undertake this project, ORD established an Interagency Coordinating Committee that includes several
Public Health Service agencies, the health and environmental agencies of the four border states, the Pan
American Health Organization and Mexican Agency counterparts.

Long-term clinical and epidemiological investigations, though worthwhile, are just beginning.  In the
interim, several grant funded projects are conducting model innovative health screens, clinical treatments
and environmental interventions in disproportionately exposed areas and homes. For example,
Milwaukee's Sixteenth Street Community Health Center is sending outreach clinical workers into the
homes of residents who traditionally do not have adequate access to health care services (See Exhibit 6-
1).  The Center targets Hispanic Americans, Southeast Asians, primarily Hmongs and Laotians, and other
ethnic groups that live in the vicinity of the center.  Outreach clinical workers canvass door to door to
conduct in-home health screens and collect baseline data documenting high blood lead levels in children,
asthma and other respiratory illnesses, and health problems related to the consumption of contaminated
fish.  Outreach environmental workers from the Center than make follow-up visits to assess and
remediate environmental hazards such as asbestos and lead paint, indoor allergen triggers such as mold,
mildew, mites, and conduct preventive health education programs for families in Spanish, Hmong, and
Laotian languages.  Regular in-home screens, treatment and environmental intervention have made a
difference in the environmental quality and health of these families.  Monitoring data have shown that
blood lead levels have dropped in treated children, asthma attacks have lessened because of improved
indoor air quality,  and health problems  related to ingestion of contaminated fish have been minimized.
Over 4,000 homes have been visited and the Center is using this information to learn more about, and
prevent potential health effects that may be caused or exacerbated by environmental influences.

                                                                           Exhibit 6-1
                      SIXTEENTH STREET COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER

              As a result of EPA seed money, this Milwaukee Health Center opened  a new
              Environmental Health office to deal with health effects in low-income, high-risk
              urban neighborhoods.  Outreach workers canvassed door to door in search of lead,
              asbestos and other environmental hazards in homes; conducted in-home  health
              screens; treated health problems and initiated preventive health education programs
              for families.  Over 4,000 homes have been  visited and  the Center is using this
              information to learn about and prevent potential health effects that may be caused or
              exacerbated by environmental influences.
                                      Public Health Indicators
                              Known
                          1.  Lead poisoning
                          2.  Asthma illnesses
                          3.  Pesticide effects
    Suspected
1.   Cancer
2.   Lupus
3.   Neurologic effects
4.   Skin ailments
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997
                                           29

-------
Indoor Air Exposures
The Office of Air and Radiation has worked with the American Lung Association (ALA) to raise
awareness in low-income and people of color communities about health risks associated with exposure to
radon, second-hand smoke and other indoor air pollutants.  In 1992, data from ALA indicated that the
prevalence rate of asthma among minority groups is 15% higher than among whites with varying degrees
                                                                            Exhibit 6-2
                                   ST. REGIS MOHAWK TRIBE
                                          A CASE STUDY

               Since the mid-1950s, the General Motors (GM) plant in Massena, New York,
               produced engine parts and used polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) in manufacturing
               hydraulic fluid.  Since PCBs were unregulated  in the  1950s, the chemical was
               dumped in the river and buried on the factory and adjacent lots. In 1982, the GM
               site was listed on Superfund'sNationalPriority's Listbecauseof PCB contamination
               to the soil, water, fish, and wildlife. The St.  Regis Mohawk Indian reservation
               adjacent to the site was heavily impacted by PCBs in contaminated fish and wildlife,
               and contaminated water sources. While ATSDRand local health agencies could not
               show a direct correlation between PCB poisoning and the health effects experienced
               by tribal members, St. Regis Indians were exposed to PCBs in amounts that raised
               health concerns. Cleanup efforts are currently being negotiated between the tribe,
               GM, EPA and New York state.
of severity.  Through a program called "Open Airways", the ALA is working with organizations like the
Zeta Phi Beta Sorority and the National Medical Association to teach high-risk asthmatic children to
manage their disease and to recognize when they need medical assistance in order to reduce the incidence
of attack.  Similar education programs are being conducted on the dangers of radon exposure and how
testing for radon and mitigating its presence can possibly prevent health problems, such as lung cancer.

Fish Consumption Studies

It has been known for some time that subsistence fishers, particularly low-income Native Americans,
African-Americans and Asian-Americans consume parts of the fish that contain higher pollutant levels
(for example, in skin, fat, and liver) or bottom dwelling fish that are more likely to contain higher levels
of contaminants.  These groups are therefore at higher risk for health effects due to contaminant
exposures. Several projects sponsored by EPA's Region X office are examining bioaccumulation of
chemicals and pesticides in fish tissues in an effort to determine the degree of risk in these populations.
Pollutants being studied include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), dioxins, furans, heavy metals and
related compounds. An example can be found in Exhibit 6-2.

The overall goal of any public health research should be long-term prevention of environmentally related
diseases.  As EPA works to ensure environmental protection for all, and sort out factors which may lead
to disparate health conditions, we must try to reduce or prevent hazardous exposures in all communities.
30
EnvironmentalJustice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
             	CHAPTER 7
              Utilizing Legal and Enforcement Tools To Implement
                                           Environmental Justice Directives
          "We recognize and support the continued growth of the State and Tribal
          regulated and voluntary programs which have greatly expanded the number
          of hazardous waste sites cleaned up to protect human health and the
          environm ent."
                                           Carol Browner, Administrator, EPA
Since environmental justice is not a single statutory concept, but rather a combination of civil rights,
environmental, constitutional, regulatory and administrative laws, this chapter presents some of the legal
policy issues and enforcement tools being used to address environmental justice situations.  The
assumption that legal tools and enforcement activities were being uniformly and equally applied in all
communities was challenged by members of the environmental justice movement.

EPA-APPROVED AND DELEGATED ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS

For many environmental laws (for example, Clean Air, Clean Water, and Safe Drinking Water acts) EPA
approves, and in some cases delegates to states and federally recognized Indian tribes, the authority to
implement their own environmental programs under federal environmental law.  In addition, local
jurisdictions (such as cities, counties, and regional boards) have land-use planning and zoning
procedures, ordinances, and hearings that impact environmental programs.  State and local requirements
are very critical to environmental justice and oftentimes overlooked. For instance, states have to consider
public safety, transportation, historic preservation sites issues, artifact laws and long-term development
plans which may influence local zoning, land-use or development decisions. Environmental justice
problems can arise when state-run, federally approved or delegated programs  conflict with local
ordinances, development, and economic growth plans impacting a disenfranchised community.

Mattaponi Tribe vs. King William County Reservoir: Case Study

In King William County,  Virginia, a proposal to build a dam, reservoir,  and pumping station on the
Mattaponi and Pamunkey Rivers, directly impacted the Mattaponi and Pamunkey Tribes. These two
small reservations are all  that remain of the Powhatan Indian Nation (Pocahontas' Tribe), which once
covered 16 million acres in Virginia, Maryland and Delaware. Virginia has a Clean Water Act-approved
water program and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality and Department of Natural
Resources have indicated support for this $200 million project (before the hearing), in part, to help
support development and better air-conditioned tourist attraction at Williamsburg and Bush Gardens.
The Mattaponi Tribe has raised environmental justice issues under federal Indian, environmental and
civil rights laws, and a 350 year-old treaty with Charles n to which all parties agreed and is still in effect.

CITIZEN PETITION PROVISIONS - TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT, SECTION 21

Many environmental laws have citizen petition provisions which allow a party to petition EPA for
rulemaking or other administrative actions.  These provisions have been used with some degree of
success by groups addressing environmental justice concerns.  In particular, the  Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA) Section 21 contains a provision to address multiple sources of different chemicals
and cumulative exposures.  EPA must respond to a petition within 90 days. Perhaps the most interesting
cases under TSCA Section 21 were the Imperial County and the Chicago Cook County petitions.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997                              31

-------
Imperial County, California Case Study

For over 50 years, the New River which flows from Mexico into Imperial County, California was highly
contaminated with multiple chemicals (for example, PCBs, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethene [DDT] and
Toxaphene), raw sewage, dead animals and floating debris. Contamination sources could include more
than 200 multi-national corporations located on the Mexico side of the border, agricultural runoff on both
sides of the border, untreated waste water, primarily on the Mexican side of the border, and the import
and export of chemical and chemical waste on both sides of the border. Data collection or monitoring of
pollution levels were not conducted and risk assessments of public health threats were not done for the
largely Hispanic and Indian, low-income residents living and working along the river. Environmental
justice groups, on behalf of citizens on both sides of the border filed a petition with EPA in 1992
requesting data collection, monitoring of river contaminants and a public health risk study.  While not
formally granting the petition, EPA agreed to pursue actions under TSCA including collection of
information on cumulative exposures of multiple chemical contaminants and health investigations.
Ninety-five information-gathering subpoenas were issued to U.S. parent corporations with branches or
subsidiaries operating near the New River, and more recently, a major enforcement action was brought
for illegal import and export violations.

Chicago Cooke County, Illinois Case Study

Residents of Cook County filed a TSCA citizens petition with EPA in 1995 to collect and monitor data
on multiple toxic chemicals (for example, lead, mercury, cadmium, dioxin and furans) which they
believed would be released as air emissions and deposits from  eight proposed hazardous waste
incinerators to be sited in their community. The affected community, largely low-income and people of
color, was already burdened with sewage treatment plants, landfills, illegal dump sites and numerous
industries. The petition asked for testing and regulation of the disposal of these chemical and asked EPA
to conduct risk assessments for health threats. The petition was not formally granted but EPA agreed to
conduct cumulative  exposure assessments  and risk analysis in the area. The Agency is now working with
the community to address these environmental issues.

CITIZEN SUIT PROVISIONS

Many of the early citizen  suit actions and litigation involved issuance and enforcement of water permits
under the  Clean Water Act (CWA). As an environmental justice legal tool, these provisions had both
advantages and disadvantages.  Citizen suit provisions require  a 90-day notice to EPA and other affected
parties such as the state and the pollution source. These parties have 90 days to remedy the violation
which could include amending the permit.

TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in
programs  and activities receiving federal financial assistance.  States operating federally authorized or
delegated environmental programs maybe liable if they are found either to intentionally discriminate or
to have  the effect of discriminating on the basis of race, color,  or national origin.  If such discrimination
is found and voluntary compliance is not reached, financial support of federal projects may be terminated
by EPA.

Chester County, Pennsylvania Case

In 1996, Chester Residents Concerned for  Quality Living filed a Title VI lawsuit in Federal court
alleging the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection violated Title VI and EPA's
implementing regulations by issuing a permit for the construction and operation of a RCRA Subtitle D


32                                Environmental Justice:  Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
solid waste facility in Chester, Pennsylvania.  The lawsuit alleged that the operation of the facility will
have discriminatory human health, environmental, and other effects on African-American members of the
community near the facility.  The case raises important issues regarding the application of Title VI in the
environmental permitting context, but also the ability of communities to litigate Title VI claims in
Federal court.  The case currently is on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on the
issue of whether private individuals may sue in Federal court to enforce an EPA regulation implementing
Title VI. The Department of Justice has filed several amicus curiae briefs in this litigation.

NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA)

The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) mandates that federal agencies consider the
environmental effects of their proposed actions as they implement their respective missions.  For
proposed actions that significantly affect the quality of the environment, federal agencies must prepare a
detailed environmental impact statement (EIS) that assesses the proposed action, the full range of
potential effects of the action (including impacts associated with human health, the  environment and
related socioeconomic concerns)  and all potential alternatives. The NEPA process is an important tool
for promoting environmental justice. Recently, the White House Council on Environmental  Quality
issued a draft guidance document outlining the consideration of environmental justice issues in all phases
of the NEPA process.

Clairborne Parish, Louisiana and the Louisiana Energy Services (LES) Case

Louisiana Energy Services (LES), a consortium of private energy power companies, applied  to the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission  (NRC) for a license to site a uranium enrichment facility in Claiborne
Parish, Louisiana.  Two small low-income African American towns, located adjacent to the proposed
facility, claimed racial discrimination in the site selection process used by LES. In fact, the facility
would bisect the community and residents claimed that LES failed to adequately  consider the
socioeconomic effects of its proposal on the community. The community raised these issues with the
NRC Licensing Board citing health and safety concerns, environmental justice issues and violation of
NEPA requirements. In a recent decision, the NRC Licensing Board decided in favor of the residents and
refused to issue a license for a proposed uranium enrichment plant in north Louisiana, stating that "its
location could discriminate against black people living near the site." It directed NRC to conduct a more
thorough investigation under NEPA to determine whether racial discrimination played a role in the site
selection process. The board said, "LES could not get a license, partly because federal officials failed to
meet their obligations under Clinton's order when they reviewed the company's process for selecting the
plant site."

NATIONAL RELOCATION POLICY

Traditionally, permanent or temporary relocation as a component of a response action has proved to be a
complex issue  for the Agency as it involves other agencies, such as HUD, state and  local governments.
Resolution actions must balance technical requirements and cost-effectiveness with competing
socioeconomic and environmental justice issues. In 1995, EPA launched an effort to develop a
nationally consistent relocation policy which addresses both health threats posed by environmental
hazards and makes cost-effective, technically sound judgements.

Escambia Superfund Site Relocation Case Study

In 1996, EPA announced its decision to relocate 358 low-income, African American families from a
toxic waste site leaching dioxin, lead, arsenic and  other contaminants into the  yards of their homes in
Pensacola, Florida.  The waste came from the cleanup of an abandoned Escambia Wood Treatment plant
piled nearly 60 feet high in an area covering about four football fields.  The families complained of


Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997                               33

-------
disparate treatment and alleged that the toxic exposure was causing health effects such as respiratory
problems, skin rashes, neurological symptoms and other illnesses.

Since EPA had relocated only about 12 communities in its 26-year history (starting with Love Canal and
Times Beach) and none this large in a people of color community, the Agency had to re-examine its past
relocation policy. The relocation cost was paid by the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
The local authorities' decision to redevelop and rezone the area for light industrial, non-residential use
also mitigated the overall relocation cost. Currently, negotiations are underway to relocate the entire
community to other parts of Florida.  In a U.S. News report entitled: "A black and green issue moves
people," Atlanta regional EPA waste management chief Richard Green states... "What is likely to occur
is that smaller contaminated communities, like Escambia, will be candidates for relocation...We're not
going to be able to empty out South Side Chicago or the Bronx. And if Escambia is any model, the local
politics will be as important in determining which communities move as the science."

SETTLEMENT PROVISIONS

In lieu of civil penalties, environmental violators are often willing to agree to settlement provisions that
achieve specific goals, such as, guarding against future noncompliance with regulations. These
settlements, called Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs), are designed to redress adverse
consequences or take actions that are broader than a penalty alone.  Under environmental justice
provisions, the affected communities can be consulted on the provisions proposed and, in some cases,
derive environmental benefit from the proposal. As the Agency continues to explore SEP provisions, it
believes that SEPs can be used as a means to promote community involvement in protecting the
environment.

Catano Residents and PREP A Case

In 1997, Residents of Catano, a low-income, Hispanic community, participated in a $6 million settlement
between EPA Region II and the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) over air, water,
underground storage tanks, chemical spill and other violations. Some of the funds derived from the civil
penalties will be used to finance  SEPs to reduce sulfur-laden emissions from PREPA's energy production
process and to restore the Las Cucharillas, one of the largest remaining wetland areas in Puerto Rico.

The consent decree anticipates that the  Conservation
Trust, Puerto Rico's only non-profit private land
conservation organization, will be in charge of
implementing the wetlands restoration project.  The
Trust will consolidate parcels of land, restore the
ecosystem, monitor unauthorized dumping, improve
water flow and quality, and implement a habitat
management plan.  In the long run, the project will
prevent discharge from industrial and residential
development, and ultimately lead to an  overall
decrease  of pollution released into the environment.
The residents are hoping that the project will be an
economic boost to their low-income community as small craft shops are being planned for the
redeveloped area.

ENFORCEMENT COMPLIANCE ACTIVITIES AND THE PUBLIC

Early and meaningful public participation in environmental processes is an important goal in advancing
an effective environmental justice program. There should be a more concerted effort to provide


34                                Environmental Justice:  Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
information to risk-prone populations and to seek input from them.  EPA should provide opportunities for
the public and other stakeholders to exchange ideas on how low-income and people of color communities
can have a better understanding and a greater interactive role in enforcement and compliance activities.

San Antonio, Texas Enforcement Roundtable

In 1996, EPA's  Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance and Region VI sponsored an
Enforcement Roundtable in collaboration with the Enforcement Subcommittee of the National
Environmental Justice Advisory Council. The purpose of the Roundtable was to bring together a variety
of stakeholders, including community-based organizations, business and industry, and local, tribal and
state agencies to initiate  dialogue and exchange ideas on how to enhance the effectiveness of
enforcement and compliance actions in environmental justice communities. The two-day session
generated several recommendations on inspection, screening and targeting strategies; community
monitoring plans; community notification and complaint resolution ideas.

CITIZENS MONITORING PROGRAMS

Increasingly as federal, state and local environmental resources dwindle, citizens may become an
important resource for assessing environmental conditions in their communities.  Two such models are
presented below whereby citizens are given incentives to identify environmental concerns in their
backyards.

Rat-on-a-Rat Program (ROAR)

The City of Houston's Department of Public Works and Engineering initiated a citizen's monitoring
program  for residents to  help identify operators and handlers who improperly dump waste materials in
certain communities. Residents are offered nominal fees for identifying any environmental violation
which results in the collection of fines or penalties. The program has proved to be a successful
monitoring effort for the citizens and a powerful deterrent for potential violators.  This "neighborhood
watch" program has resulted in a cleaner, greener neighborhood in communities.

Monetary Awards Approved Under The Clean Air Act

On February 7,  1997, Assistant Administrator Steve Herman approved the payment of monetary awards
to citizens who  helped the Agency take successful enforcement actions under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
These were the  first monetary awards given under the CAA, which authorizes EPA to make  awards of up
to $10,000, after an enforcement action is concluded, to citizens who reported violations or assisted the
Agency in enforcement proceedings.  The Agency gave a total  of $37,000 to 20 citizens, whose
individual awards ranged from $300 to $10,000.  The Agency assessed a total of more than $1.5 million
in civil and administrative penalties in these cases; 17 citizens  assisted EPA in enforcing against
violations of CAA Title VI (stratospheric ozone protection), and three were involved in asbestos
NESHAPS cases.

The $10,000 maximum award was made to a citizen who helped EPA conclude a major asbestos
enforcement case.  The citizen learned that children were playing with bags of a powdery substance in an
abandoned industrial building.  Suspecting that the material was asbestos, he warned the children,
contacted the local air pollution control agency, and provided other information about the large quantity
of asbestos improperly stored there. Follow-up inspections documented numerous violations of asbestos
removal requirements. In addition to protecting children from  this hazardous substance, the citizen's
action helped EPA successfully prosecute the violator. An EPA press advisory was released on February
14. The  awardees have been notified and the Air Enforcement Division is completing the process for
payment.


Environmental Justice:  Working Toward Solutions - August 1997                               35

-------
EMERGING COMPLIANCE ENFORCEMENT INITIATIVES

Two new compliance and enforcement initiatives provide a different perspective than traditional actions
directed at specific industrial sectors.  A brief description of these two initiatives follows.

Urban Pesticide Abuse

In November 1994, EPA's Region V office was contacted by the Ohio Department of Agriculture and the
Lorain County Health Department regarding an investigation into an uncertified and unlicencedpest
control operator. The operator had been applying methyl parathion agricultural pesticide to hundreds of
residences located in economically depressed minority communities for over 17 years. The pesticide,
normally restricted for agricultural use was being applied to these homes for roach and other pest control.
Unfortunately, similar incidents observed in Ohio, Michigan and Louisiana highlights an emerging
pattern of illegal diversion of restricted use pesticides, particularly methyl and ethyl parathion, from the
agribusiness marketplace to low-income and minority communities principally in urban areas.

Although, several operators and applicators have been fined millions of dollars and others jailed on
felony charges, tragically some of these incidents have resulted in community evacuations and human
fatalities. EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance and the Office of Prevention,
Pesticide, and Toxic Substances have joined forces to address this new environmental justice problem
peculiar to primarily economically depressed communities located in old neighborhoods with long-
standing pest problems and minimal resources for pest control.

Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO)

Within the last few years, the growing industry of animal factory operations (for example, poultry, and
hog producers) is locating in rural communities populated by low-income and minority residents.  Waste
from these huge animal factory farms  is creating serious  environmental pollution, from water
contamination and fish kills to health threatening illnesses. In states, such as North Carolina, Virginia,
Utah, Iowa, Mississippi, Kansas, and Tennessee minimal environmental regulations to deal with waste
products from large corporate animal operations are in effect. In smaller, traditional farms, waste is
spread relatively evenly and thinly over the landscape and absorbed gradually.  On the other hand, the
huge volumes generated by animal factories are stored in settlement and evaporation lagoons that burst or
leak into surface and/or groundwater.  Such wastes contaminate well water and surface water with
parasites, bacteria, viruses, nitrates, heavy metals and other compounds. High levels of chemicals from
these wastes are oftentimes linked to several diseases which can be fatal in children, the elderly and other
sensitive groups.
36                                Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
                                                              	CHAPTER 8
                                                               Regional Highlights
This chapter highlights some of the accomplishments of EPA Regional Offices. Space does not permit a
complete exposition of the activities aimed at environmental justice goals by EPA Regional Offices.
Many of these activities are unique to the Regions. The Regional Offices, as in the Headquarters Offices,
have an Environmental Justice Coordinator to oversee the environmental justice program.
REGION I
BACKGROUND

Region I established an Environmental Justice Council made up of fifteen representatives from various
regional division offices. The Council is responsible for assisting the leadership team and the regional
Environmental Justice Coordinator in the integration of environmental justice into daily regional
operations. The Office of Regional Counsel also has created an Environmental Justice Workgroup.
Additionally, the region developed an Environmental Justice Policy and a Regional Action Agenda to
address environmental risks to low-income communities and communities of color, and to foster
innovative partnerships with community groups and other stakeholders.

MAJOR INITIA TIVES

Boston: Sustainable Neighborhood Organizations

The organization, "Neighborhoods Against Urban Pollution", grew out of a community driven/Agency
co-sponsored yearlong, collaborative effort of local, city, state, federal agencies and non-profit academic
organizations working on hazardous waste issues in Roxbury, Massachusetts, (pre-Brownfields). A
major goal of the project is to support the efforts of low-income and minority neighborhoods in Boston to
identify, prioritize, and address environmental and health threats in their communities and cultivate local
environmental leadership. So far, four successful neighborhood campaigns have resulted in the
establishment of working groups to:

       •   Restore vacant lots;
       •   Reduce respiratory threats from indoor air environments;
       •   Provide/seek out pollution prevention assistance for local auto body/repair
           shops; and
       •   Educate residents on environmental problems and solutions.

Criminal Case Highlights

On June 25, 1996, Thomas  Kassery, the owner of a metal plating business operating under the name of
the Plating Center, Inc., pleaded guilty to abandoning thousands of pounds of hazardous waste in a mixed
residential/industrial neighborhood in Bridgeport, Connecticut.  Kassery abandoned his metal plating
shop in 1993 leaving behind uncovered plating and stripping baths, open and unsealed drums of acids
and cyanides, and large quantities of other hazardous wastes.  Evidence gathered during the investigation
indicates that the building was broken into and vandalized on several occasions after it was abandoned.
The shop was discovered by Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection in July 1995. Kassery
declined to cleanup the facility.  EPA ultimately spent more than $200,000 to remove and dispose of the
hazardous wastes in the building.
Environmental Justice:  Working Toward Solutions -August 1997                               37

-------
Kassery pleaded guilty to one count of storage of hazardous waste without a permit and faces up to 5
years in jail and a fine up to $50,000 per day of violation.  There has been no agreement between the
government and Kassery as to an appropriate sentencing level. The government expects to seek a
substantial jail sentence, in part because of the dangers posed by the abandoned wastes, Kassery's history
of failing to comply with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requirements,  and his
failure to pay a $100,000 state RCRA penalty. Sentencing is scheduled in the Federal District Court in
New Haven.

New England Urban Environmental Initiative

In urban areas throughout New England, residents are exposed to a multitude of environmental hazards,
ranging from lead paint to auto emissions and poor indoor air quality.  Cumulatively, the effects of these
hazards upon urban residents, especially sensitive populations such as children and the elderly, are
compounded by other economic  and social ills resulting in a complex and unique health risk.

The New England region uses its resources to leverage development of sustainable public/private
partnerships to identify, assess, and address urban environmental hazards, and reduce environmental
degradation. Priority environmental and public health projects in targeted neighborhoods include, but are
not limited to a number of pilot efforts, such as restoration of urban river quality, lead poisoning
prevention and mitigation, identifying environmental factors which affect respiratory functions, and
restoring contaminated land and vacant lots.  It is through these pilot projects that the Agency hopes to
build local infrastructure and address priority environmental issues.

Partners in this initiative are local residents, neighborhood community organizations, nonprofit
organizations, the private sector, academia, municipal, state, and other federal agencies that can
substantially contribute to data collection, assessment, problem identification, prioritization,
implementation,  and work plan development.

Small Grants Program.  As part of EPA's mission to protect public health and the environment, the
environmental Justice Program in Region I is committed to upholding the fair treatment of, and
meaningful involvement of all people in this process. Through the administration of the Environmental
Justice Grant Program, Region I has found a way to achieve this  goal.  Funding from the Environmental
Justice Grant Program has contributed to the following activities:

       •   Indoor Air Quality Projects. The Committee for Boston Public Housing
           (CBPH) received Environmental Justice grant funding to conduct an "Asthma
           Education and Prevention" project.  Studies revealed that 60% of families living
           in Boston Public Housing had at least one family member with asthma; making
           this a very personal  and urgent issue.  The project was  designed to educate and
           advocate for public housing residents suffering from asthma. Community
           Organizers from CBPH put together an advisory board comprising community
           residential activists and health providers. Seven individuals from three Boston
           public housing facilities (Camden/Lenox, Alice Taylor and Mission Main) were
           then selected to participate in the training project.

       •   Restoration of Urban Rivers.  Funding from the Environmental Justice Grant
           Program has contributed to promoting community involvement in the restoration
           of the Woonasquatucket River in Providence,  Rhode Island. As part of this
           project, environmental issues such as improper dumping, littering, and lack of
           green/recreational space will be addressed.  The Urban Environmental Initiative
           (UEI), a regional program that incorporates principles of both environmental
           justice and community based environmental protection, has built on the efforts


38                               Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
           of this funded activity. UEI has plans to implement a comparative risk
           assessment project, with a focus on the Woonasquatucket River and the
           surrounding greenway.

           The Chelsea Creek Riverway project in Chelsea, Massachusetts is another urban
           restoration project. Two Environmental Justice Grant recipients, the
           Neighborhood of Affordable Housing (NOAH), and Reaching Out to Chelsea
           Adolescents (ROCA), deserve much credit for using these funded activities to
           leverage additional resources for the project. Other partners include both Region
           I's UEI and the Massachusetts State Program as well as other environmental and
           community-based organizations. The comparative risk assessment to be
           conducted on this urban waterway will be implemented mainly out of the
           Massachusetts State Program and UEI.

Status of Greater Lawrence Incinerator Enforcement Strategy

In November 1996, the Urban Team convened a meeting with Merrimack Valley Environmental
Coalition (MVEC). The purpose  of the meeting was to bring together all parties interested in compliance
issues at the Lawrence and North  Andover incinerators. At the meeting, representatives from
Alternatives for Community and the Environment provided the group with an oral report of its findings
on the incinerators. This gave both EPA and the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) an
opportunity to provide some guidance to MVEC on a number of issues concerning the underlying permits
at this facility. Some issues of concern are the exempt and non-exempt exceedances, interpretation of
CEM data, inconsistencies in reporting data, and the interpretation of some state-only compliance limits.

EPA and the State also provided the group a status report of its activities at these facilities. EPA has
initiated a review of compliance data at the facilities, conducted a preliminary CEM audit at the North
Andover incinerator and plans to  conduct audits/inspections at all three facilities. The Region also is in
the process of reviewing the terms of the permits  at each of the facilities.
REGION II
BACKGROUND

In May 1994, Jeanne M. Fox, Regional Administrator, signed into effect a Regional Order which
established the Region II Environmental Justice Work Group (REJWG). In October 1994, the REJWG
developed the Environmental Justice Operation Plan and Education Subplan. In February 1995, the
Region selected a full-time Environmental Justice Coordinator, Melva J. Hayden.  The Environmental
Justice Coordinator reports directly to and is located in the Office of the Regional Administrator. In
1996, the Regional Environmental Justice Charter was revised to establish membership criteria for the
REJWG. The most notable changes to the revised Environmental Justice Charter include a provision that
at least one of the three division representatives to the REJWG be a branch chief, or the level of a team
leader to ensure management accountability. The other significant change provides for the appointment
of Environmental Justice Division Contacts at the level of a branch chief/team leader or deputy director
to ensure adequate communications on environmental justice matters requiring referral to a division
director or senior manager.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997                               39

-------
MAJOR INITIATIVES

Development of Environmental Justice Tracking/Reporting Mechanism

The Environmental Justice Coordinator is working with the environmental assistant and special assistant
to the Deputy Regional Administrator to develop a computer program to record and track Environmental
Justice inquiries received in the Region.  The computer program will be updated to serve as a tool for
generating Environmental Justice reports and tracking Environmental Justice matters to facilitate
effective follow-up.

Environmental Justice Index Mapping Project

The Region's Office of Policy and Management (OPM) completed the atlas of maps depicting potential
Environmental Justice areas in all New Jersey counties, based on the OPM Environmental Justice Index
Mapping geographic information systems (GIS) coverages. Maps of potential Environmental  Justice
areas in New York were completed for approximately eight New York counties. The New Jersey maps
are currently being formatted for the Region n home page on the Internet.

In fiscal year (FY) 1997, OPM will complete the New York atlas and begin work on a similar  atlas for
Puerto Rico. Other future activities include:  1) posting the New York and Puerto Rico atlases on the
Region n home page; 2) developing Environmental Justice index coverages for the Virgin Islands; 3)
reviewing/revising the analyses that have been completed in light of comments received from  reviewers
and the guidelines set forth in Region II's draft Interim Policy on Identifying Environmental Justice
Areas; and, 4) designing an Arc View-based Environmental Justice application to support Region II's
process for identifying Environmental Justice areas.

Grants Workshops Conducted in Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands, New York City and
New Jersey

        •   The Region's Communications Division has conducted five small grants
           workshops. An integral part of the workshop is a discussion on the
           Environmental Justice Small Grants Program.  Workshops were conducted in
           San Juan, Puerto  Rico; Mayaquez, Puerto Rico; St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands;
           St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands; and Niagara Falls, New York. Two additional
           Small Grants Workshops have been conducted in New York and New Jersey.

        •   A past Environmental Justice Small Grant recipient, the Citizens Committee,
           compiled and published an "Environmental Justice Directory." This is a
           directory of organizations in New York City that provide services to grassroots
           groups through community empowerment activities.

Incorporating Environmental Justice into Brownflelds Pilots - Rochester, Buffalo, New York City,
and Trenton, New Jersey

The Environmental Justice Coordinator and the Region's Brownfields Coordinators met with the staff of
the Mayor's Office of Environmental  Affairs to discuss the importance of including Environmental
Justice concerns in the Brownfields pilot project.  This can be accomplished by including representatives
of Environmental Justice and community groups in the planning and implementation of the Brownfields
pilot project. As a result of that meeting and the Region's Brownfields  forum held in FY96, Michelle
DePass, Executive Director, NYCEJA, is now a member of the community advisory group to  that
project.
40                               Environmental Justice:  Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
Incorporation of Environmental Justice into Region's Community Based Environmental Program
(CBEP)

Region II created a Community Based Environmental Program (CBEP) Work Group to develop and
implement the Region's CBEP Initiative.  In FY96, the  CBEP Workgroup incorporated Environmental
Justice into the CBEP model, for example, Environmental Justice is one of the criteria in selecting CBEP
projects.  To ensure cross coordination between programs the Region's Environmental Justice
Coordinator is a member of the CBEP Work Group and the CBEP Coordinator is a member of the
REJWG.

Indian Program Environmental Justice Activities Updates

In FY96, Region n continued to provide assistance to the seven federally recognized Indian nations.
Specifically, the Region continues to award General Assistance to three of the Indian nations. Through
these grants, consortium activities are supported; thereby assisting all seven of the Region n Indian
nations.  In addition, the Region awards program specific funds under a number of programs including
solid waste, air, water, Superfund etc. Through program support, along with technical assistance, and
enhanced communications, the Region  continues to assist the Indian nations in the development of
environmental capabilities.

       •   Environmental Justice Issues Raised in General Motors (GM) Site - Massena,
           New York - Update. EPA has spent considerable time and effort to resolve the
           disposal of material at the General Motors  (GM) Site contaminated with PCBs
           above 10 parts per million (ppm). EPA's original Record of Decision (ROD)
           called for treatment of all material with PCB  concentrations above 10 ppm.  In
           1995,  consistent with EPA guidance and in response to a request from GM, EPA
           proposed to treat material with concentrations above 500 ppm and to contain
           on-site material with PCB concentrations below 500 ppm. The Mohawks have
           strenuously objected to this change as it would result in a much greater volume
           of material (with concentrations as high as 500 ppm) being left on-site.  Site
           cleanup work has virtually halted pending resolution of this issue. Based on
           recent developments, EPA is hopeful that there may be some movement on this
           issue.  EPA will propose a meeting with Mohawk officials and the Mohawk
           property owners adjacent to the Site.  Once the issue is resolved, remediation of
           the site can continue.

       •   West Valley Demonstration Project - Seneca and Tonawanda Indian Nations,
           The Region was successful in requesting that the U.S. Department of Energy
           (DOE) consider Environmental Justice in its proposed plan to remediate the
           West Valley Demonstration Project in Cattaraugus, New York with respect to
           the potential impact of the project on the surface and groundwater the Seneca
           and Tonawanda Nations depend upon for subsistence. In addition, DOE has
           agreed to create a citizens task force which will include the Seneca and
           Tonawanda Nations in consideration of options to remediate the site.

South Bronx CBEP Initiative

In response to a request from the Bronx State  Senator's office, the New York City Department of
Environmental Protection (NYCDEP) and the Environmental Defense Fund, EPA designated the South
Bronx for a community-based effort in FY96 and FY97, with a focus on the Hunts Point area. EPA's
partners in the South Bronx Project are the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,
the New York State Department of Health, the New York City Department of Environmental Protection,


Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997                              41

-------
the New York City Department of Health, and the New York City Department of Sanitation. EPA also
has interacted with city and state agencies (that are not CBEP partners) whose authorities/regulations are
relevant to an identified concern of the community such as, zoning, permitting, illegal activities, etc.

Issues:  South Bronx residents have expressed environmental justice concerns. These concerns are
predicated on the inordinate number of industrial facilities in this community. They view their
community as a waste "dumping ground". Facilities located in the South Bronx include waste transfer
stations (for solid waste, construction and demolition debris, putrescible and medical waste), a
wastewater treatment plant and a sewage sludge treatment plant, all  of which residents believe contribute
to the strong odors in the area.  Residents' primary health complaint of asthma, the highest in New York
City, may be caused by ambient air pollution.

The goal is to address residents' environmental concerns and build local capacity in this mixed
industrial-residential area through direct action by EPA (such as, inspections, outreach, information
dissemination, etc.) and facilitation of action by state and local agencies.

Update on Environmental Justice Activities in Puerto Rico

Region n remains committed to its goal of increasing public participation in environmental justice and
environmental matters of concern to environmental/community groups in Puerto Rico.  The Region has
sought to accomplish this in the following ways:  (1) increased representation for Puerto Rico on the
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council (NEJAC), (2) annual meetings between the Regional
Administrator and community groups in Puerto Rico, (3) intensification of enforcement actions in Puerto
Rico, (4) regional participation in the Puerto Rico Department of Natural Resources Workgroup, and (5)
increased representation for Puerto Rico through special initiatives and exploration of long-term regional
options.

        •   Cataiio Environmental Quality Study, Cataiio,  Puerto Rico. In 1992, the
           Region began an Environmental Quality Study of the Catano area in Puerto Rico
           in response to the community's health concerns. Respiratory problems and
           cancer rates in the area were reportedly higher than those found on the rest of the
           Island. These health problems were attributed by residents to pollution from a
           number of nearby industrial sources.

        •   Tropical Fruits Site (TFS).  The Regional Administrator conducted a site visit
           to the TFS during the August 13th non-governmental organizations meeting in
           Ponce, Puerto Rico. As a result of that visit and observation of the site
           condition, the Regional Administrator met with the Puerto Rico Department of
           Agriculture (PROA). These meetings have resulted in the PRDA taking
           appropriate enforcement action against the Tropical Fruits entity.  In  addition,
           EPA Region II has initiated enforcement action for violations of the wetlands
           protection regulations and worker protection standards.

In order to address community concerns regarding respiratory problems, the Region entered into an
agreement with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP) to study  the prevalence and
severity of asthma in school-age children in the municipality of Catano. The CDCP asthma study,
completed in April 1996, found that both the Catano community and the control area, which is
considered a relatively "pristine" area in terms of air pollution, showed high levels of asthma among
school children.  The Region and the Puerto Rico Department  of Health co-sponsored a workshop in
Puerto Rico on April 25 and 26 to discuss these results with national and international experts in air
pollution and respiratory disease. This workshop resulted in recommendations on steps to be taken to
address community health concerns.


42                               Environmental Justice:  Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
REGION ffl

BACKGROUND

Region III created an Environmental Justice Office to better address the environmental justice concerns
in the region. The Region is participating in a number of cooperative efforts with state and local
government, universities, citizens groups, private businesses and industry, various federal agencies, and
other EPA offices in various environmental initiatives being conducted throughout the Region.  These
efforts are designed to implement risk reduction and pollution prevention strategies, increase public
awareness, effectively eliminate/minimize risks, increase public awareness and community involvement,
and to answer important research questions related to environmental risk and exposure.

MAJOR INITIA TIVES

Anacostia Initiative

A full-time EPA staff person has been assigned to work exclusively on the Anacostia Initiative, in
cooperation with the District of Columbia and the Anacostia community to restore the Bay and address
environmental justice concerns.  Remedial Action Plans for three designated regions of concerns in urban
settings (Baltimore Harbor, Anacostia River, and the Elizabeth River) have been completed.  The
Community Based Protection Office (CBPO) has provided $600,000 for the development of the plans
and technical support for this project.  The Scientific & Technical Advisory Committee of the CBPO
sponsored a 2-day conference with minority universities and colleges  on increasing opportunities for
minority participation in the CBPO during 1995. Increased diversity in the workplace through outreach
programs is important.

Baltimore Symposium on Urban Environmental Justice

The  "Baltimore Symposium on Urban Environmental Justice Research and Education" was an outgrowth
of the Baltimore Urban Environmental Initiative and related activities in Baltimore.  The EPA, the
Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), the City of Baltimore, International City/County
Management Association, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Morgan State University,
Sojourner Douglass College, Middle East Organization, African American Environmentalist Association,
and Center for Environment, Commerce and Energy sponsored the Symposium in Baltimore, Maryland at
Morgan State University on October 21 and 22,  1995. It created an opportunity for scientists, educators,
federal, state and local government representatives, and community leaders to discuss past and on-going
urban environmental justice research as well as future research needs  of the Baltimore Community.
Papers were presented on a wide variety of environmental topics relevant to Baltimore, a number of
which were an outgrowth of projects funded through the Baltimore Urban Environmental Initiative.
Symposium proceedings are available upon request. A follow-up event is now in the early stages of
planning.

Edison High School Pond Restoration

The  Drinking Water/Ground Water Protection Branch of the Water Protection Division initiated a project
with Edison High School, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania during FY94. The purpose of this project was to
provide and lend assistance to Edison High School students in their efforts to restore and maintain  an on-
site school pond. The student body, mostly Hispanic and African-American, is located in a blighted
section of the city.  This pond was created by the students/faculty and served as a resource for biology
classes. Over the years, this pond fell into disuse and the Region offered to assist in restoration. The
proj ect was monitored by the Office of Water Shed. Other key partners in this j oint effort were
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997                               43

-------
Philadelphia Regional Introduction of Minorities to Engineering (PRIME) and the U.S. Natural
Resources Conservation Service. The project was completed in June 1996.

Environmental Justice Small Community Grants

Success stories related to the Environmental Justice Small Community Grants Program include a project
being conducted by the Virginia Water Project, Inc. in the State of Delaware. The project was designed
to build capacity within five low-income and minority communities to evaluate conditions resulting from
environmental inequity, identify options and resources for solutions and foster partnerships between
these communities and state agency representatives. The workshop and related activities conducted by
the Virginia Water Project, Inc. were fully successful in achieving these goals.  As a result of the project,
the State of Delaware made changes in its environmental justice policy  and developed a positive working
relationship with a number of low-income  and minority communities in the state.

Weekly lead education and awareness sessions are being conducted for the children of Chester, as a
result of the lead education and outreach activities conducted by the Faith Holy Temple Church and
Chester Concerned Citizens for Quality Living.  The project is partially funded by an environmental
justice grant targeted to small communities. The Chester Lead Awareness Campaign has awarded Zulene
Mayfield, President of the Chester Concerned Citizens for Quality Living, the David Chakabarty
Memorial Award for contributions to the community related to  environmental and community health
matters.

The Hampton University Environmental Justice  Research Center

The Hampton University Environmental Research Center Campus Executive Program in Hampton,
Virginia also has afforded the Region a number of opportunities through which to address environmental
justice. Through assistance from the Region, Hampton University has established an Environmental
Equity Research and  Community Assistance Center.  Its capabilities include GIS data analyses,
environmental engineering consultation, and scientific and sociological investigation.

Hampton University has established an Environmental Justice Information Center in Hampton, Virginia.
A major goal of the Center is the empowerment of the local community with regard to environmental
issues, through technical support, education and training.

South Baltimore Environmental Justice Community Involvement Partnership Project

A cooperative project developed by the Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic  Substances (OPPTS)
cooperation with Region IE,  is designed to address the environmental concerns of the residents living and
working in South Baltimore. The project was developed in partnership with MDE, the City of Baltimore,
area business and industry, and the residents living in the communities of Cherry Hill, Brooklyn,
Brooklyn Park, Curtis Bay, Fairfield, Hawkins Point, and Wagner's Point.  The project focuses on efforts
to effectively address the concerns of the environmental justice movement and communities in the area
through a cooperative partnership. Thus far, the partnership has held a  public meeting attended by more
than 200 area residents where the community identified and began to prioritize their environmental
concerns. As a result of this meeting, five focus groups were formed to develop action plans for each of
the areas of environmental concern identified by the community.  Each  focus group  is co-chaired by a
community resident and an area business person.  The groups currently are developing plans of action. It
is hoped that the cooperative efforts of this community-based partnership will lead to a better
understanding of all of the key issues as well as helping to identify solutions for problems and concerns
identified by the community.
44                               Environmental Justice:  Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
The project is a companion piece to the Baltimore Urban Environmental Initiative that will serve as a
model for the development of community-based partnerships.  In addition, the initiative will serve as a
model for developing an effective means of addressing community-based environmental concerns, as
well as a means of providing information on technical support to communities on relevant environmental
issues and concerns, and serve as a forum for community outreach and empowerment.

South/Southwest Philadelphia Environmental Health Characterization Study

In December 1994, Region in began a Community-Based Environmental Project in South/Southwest
Philadelphia. The project was initiated in response to community concerns that their area of Philadelphia
was subject to an inordinate amount of industrial development which resulted in higher than average
pollutant levels and, therefore, adversely impacted the health of the community. The Region entered into
a two-year Cooperative Agreement with the Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public
Health to conduct an Environmental and Health Characterization of South/Southwest Philadelphia. The
purpose of the Study was to determine the state of the environment using existing data bases and to
develop a health profile of the community. The Study is not intended to identify cause and effect
relationships nor is it an epidemiological study.

During the course of the Study, the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) study team assembled a Community
Advisory Committee (CAC) composed of representatives of community organizations and a Science
Advisory Committee (SAC) comprised of representatives of local Universities and Health organizations.
The CAC has been instrumental in identifying community concerns and the SAC has provided necessary
expertise. In addition, the Region formalized a working relationship with Departments of the
Philadelphia City government, the Regional Office of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection and the Philadelphia Local Emergency Planning Committee.  This group, the Environmental
Implementation Team, has served in reviewing the progress of the  study and working together to solve
problems of an immediate nature.

The study is now entering the final stages of data gathering and analysis, and a final report is expected in
1997. The report will contain findings and recommendations which will be reviewed and acted upon by
the appropriate government agencies.  JHU also will be conducting educational sessions to provide the
communities with a background that will allow them to review the report and understand its findings.
REGION IV
BACKGROUND

Region IV established an Office of Environmental Justice to develop a program to address environmental
hazards with disproportionately high and adverse impacts on minority and/or socioeconomically
disadvantaged communities.  Over the last four years, the regional environmental justice program has
continued to evolve.

In 1996, EPA Region IV underwent a major re-organization. A new division, the Environmental
Accountability Division (BAD), was established. As a result of the reorganization, the Environmental
Justice/Community Liaison (Environmental Justice/CL) Program was strategically moved to the new
division to ensure that the overall mission of the Environmental Justice/CL program was accomplished
and that resources within BAD were designated appropriately. BAD is responsible for the overall
direction, administration, and evaluation of regional integration of environmental justice into the
Region's daily activities.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997                               45

-------
MAJOR INITIATIVES

Air, Pesticides, and Toxic Management Division (APTMD)

The Air, Pesticides, and Toxic Management Division (APTMD) distributes information, translates
materials, and holds workshops to inform local agricultural workers about pesticide risks and provisions
for workers' safety. APTMD also is conducting enforcement initiatives within the Tri-State area and
Mobile, Alabama to investigate and secure source compliance with applicable air and toxic regulations
and standards. Finally, APTMD conducted outreach activities on radon and lead-based paint exposures
and worked with the Corporation for National and Community Service to develop radon and lead-based
paint outreach programs.  The overall goal is to foster an understanding of the 1018 rule on lead-based
paint and lead-based paint hazards.

Charleston/North Charleston Community-Based Environmental Protection Initiative

Charleston/North Charleston is a geographic area with a number of environmental quality and human
health issues. Heavy industrialization of the Charleston/North Charleston area in the 1800's has resulted
in a complex combination of environmental problems.  Past multi-media inspections have uncovered
hazardous waste violations, wastewater discharges exceeding permit limits, and air quality concerns. In
addition, this area contains a major Superfund site, numerous Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) sites, impacted wetlands, contaminated sediments, and fish
advisories for portions of adjacent waterways. Environmental  activity associated with the closure of the
Naval Base and with a project that monitors the water quality of the Charleston Harbor system has
compounded the scope  of problems  faced by this community. The area also presents concerns from an
environmental justice perspective in that the population in this highly industrialized corridor is
predominantly minority, with a significant proportion living below the poverty level.

The overall objective of the  community-based effort is a comprehensive environmental study of this area
followed by appropriate solutions to environmental and human health issues of concern in the
community. The project will adopt  a problem-solving approach to, (1) determine the root causes of the
problems, (2) decide which tools will best address these problems, (3) develop administrative and
environmental indicators, and (4) measure progress. Solutions will incorporate ways of maximizing
opportunity for community input in  the decision-making process and be geared toward partnering with
the state, other federal agencies, and local leaders.

Divisional Programs and Initiatives

        •   The Escambia  Treating Company (ETC). In June 1995, EPA nominated the
           Escambia site for inclusion in the National Relocation Evaluation Pilot.  The
           pilot efforts will be used by EPA in the development of a national relocation
           policy.  The objective of this policy is to determine when relocation should be
           used in addressing the health threats posed by Superfund sites in a way that
           reflects community interests, juxtaposed against cost-effective and technically
           sound remediation alternatives.

           The ETC site is located in Pensacola, Escambia County, Florida. The 26-acre
           ETC site, located in a mixed industrial and residential area, is bordered on the
           north by residential neighborhoods, on the west by Palafox Street, on the east by
           the Railroad Switchyard, and on the south by an abandoned concrete plant and a
           small industrial park. The site is an abandoned wood preserving facility that
           operated from 1942 until 1982. In October of 1991, EPA began a removal action
           to excavate contaminated materials and to estimate the amount of material to be


46                              Environmental Justice:  Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
           removed in subsequent phases.  The removal action was completed in 1992. The
           excavated material (225,000 cubic yards) currently is stockpiled under secure
           cover on-site.

           In April 1996, EPA issued a proposed plan for the Escambia Superfund Site and
           proposed a remedy for relocation of 66 households in the Rosewood Terrace
           Subdivision. The proposed remedy was intended to address contamination in the
           yards of 22 households and the effects of implementing the remedy on the
           remaining 44 households. In August  1996, EPA announced its intention to
           expand the relocation program to include the Oak Park Subdivision, thus adding
           an additional 35 households. The expansion was proposed in recognition of the
           isolating effect the Rosewood Terrace subdivision relocation would have on the
           single family homes of the Oak  Park community and the community's concerns
           with regard to site contamination.

           The Record of Decision (ROD)  proposes to add Escambia Arms Apartment
           complex and the Goulding subdivision to the relocation, for a total of
           approximately 358 households.  The remedy is based on health risk reduction,
           community welfare, cost benefits and operational concerns, configuration of the
           land area, as well as long-term community development goals. Initial
           implementation of the relocation program will begin in 1997.

       •   Tri-State Area of Kentucky. A data collection and model exposure project
           with support of the Commonwealth of Kentucky was implemented to monitor
           toxic releases from numerous industries affecting the Tri-State area of Kentucky,
           Ohio, and West Virginia.

       •   Tift  County Georgia Environmental Justice Initiative. The region has
           developed and is in the process  of implementing the Tift County Georgia
           Environmental Justice Geographic  Initiative. The pilot project will study waste
           sites located in Tifton, Georgia and the surrounding area within Tift County.
           Tifton, which has a population of approximately 15,000 residents, includes a
           total of nineteen (19) potential hazardous waste sites.  These include one
           National Priority List (NPL) site, one site currently under evaluation for
           inclusion on the NPL, and six sites  that have undergone or are currently
           undergoing the process of waste removal.  EPA is working with the  Citizens
           League Opposed to Unwanted Toxins (a citizen's group in Tifton), the Georgia
           Environmental Protection Division, and the Tift County Board of
           Commissioners to address the potential environmental harm resulting from these
           sites in Tift County. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
           also  has been active through existing  agreements with EPA, by providing public
           health assessments in communities surrounding NPL sites.   In an effort to
           highlight activities in Tift County, Region IV senior management officials
           attended several community/public meetings to maintain open communication
           with local community leaders and residents.

Environmental Justice Small Grants Program

The Grants Program has been beneficial in establishing and promoting partnerships with colleges and
universities in the southeast that play a pivotal role in assisting  and supporting the many grassroots
organizations, as well as state and local governments on Environmental  Justice issues. An example is
Vanderbilt University Medical School's Service Training for Environmental Progress (STEP) Program.


Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997                               47

-------
The program trains graduate and undergraduate students to provide technical assistance to low-income
community groups confronting environmental problems. Through its summer internship program, STEP
interns provide assistance to communities in documenting pollution and educating the public on the
technical aspects of environmental issues. In the last four years, one-half of STEP'S projects were
conducted in communities of color.

Mobile County, Alabama

The Region IV Air and Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act Enforcement Branch,
along with the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM), received a number of air
pollution related complaints from citizens living in and around the Mobile, Alabama area. Some of the
complaints are in relation to sandblasting, painting of boats and open burning of laminants from wood
furniture manufacture. Based on the complaints as well as a request from the Region IV Office of
Environmental Justice, the Air Enforcement Branch pursued these issues employing a community-based
environmental protection approach.

Walker County, Alabama

In FY96, Region IV conducted an environmental justice investigation at the Pineview Sanitary
Landfill/Yerkwood Community. The investigation was requested by the Region's Water Management
Division in support of the Environmental Justice Program and in response to environmental concerns
from the Yerkwood Community.

The data-gathering component of the investigation was conducted in two phases. Phase One focused
primarily on the characterization of the water streams within the landfill and the Yerkwood Community,
and the evaluation of the overall physical conditions of the entire area. Phase Two was conducted in an
effort to provide answers to some of the findings from Phase One.

According to the final report, two creeks that traverse the Yerkwood community are polluted and some  of
the sources impacting the creeks have been identified.  During the investigation, the storm water
discharges from several outfalls at the  Pineview Landfill experienced a deterioration in effluent quality
when compared to the previous discharge (prior to the  rain events). Additional  investigations need to be
conducted to confirm this conclusion.

The report has been transmitted to ADEM for circulation and review. A meeting will be scheduled with
the community in FY97 to discuss the  findings of the investigation. At this time, no further action
regarding the investigation has been recommended.
REGION V
BACKGROUND

In 1996, under a reorganization program, Region V established a Regional Team tasked with overseeing
the Region's implementation of its environmental justice initiatives. Under the direction of the
Environmental Justice Regional Team Manager, the team develops projects, provides consultation, and
advocates targeting of resources toward environmental justice issues and concerns.
48                               Environmental Justice:  Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
MAJOR INITIATIVES

Central Wayne Municipal Waste Combustor, Dearborn Heights/Inkster, Michigan

In response to concerns of citizens and environmental groups regarding health and environmental impacts
from the operation of the incinerator over the past 30 years, EPA, in cooperation with the State and
County government agencies, will conduct a soil sampling effort in the community to assess the scope of
impacts.  The project provides for strong community involvement and public participation.


"Community Involvement in the Enforcement Process" Workshop

In June 1996, EPA, in collaboration with Chicago-Kent College of Law held a conference to bring public
interest attorneys and other stakeholders, active or interested in Environmental Justice issues, together
with government attorneys to discuss ways to more effectively involve impacted communities in the
enforcement process. The conference was well received and resulted in a positive and enlightening
dialogue.  Region V plans to conduct a number of follow-up activities on this important issue.

Gateway Initiative "Tire Amnesty Days"

The accumulation of tires in abandoned houses, empty city lots, and in alleys  and lesser used streets is
one of the greatest community concerns in East St. Louis, Missouri and surrounding communities such
as, Washington Park, Alorton, Centreville, Brooklyn, Madison and Venice. To  address  the issue, Region
V teamed up with the Illinois EPA to sponsor "Tire Amnesty Days" on October 15 through 17, 1996.
Tires were accepted free of charge at four locations in the metropolitan East St.  Louis area.  The tires
were shredded at a new facility in East St. Louis that is operated by the Department of Correction, and
transported to local industries for use as a fuel alternative.  Unlike tire collections sponsored by the State
in the past, this one had a strong community-based component.  Volunteers went out in trucks provided
by the City of East St. Louis and St. Clair County Sheriffs Department, and picked up tires that had been
dumped illegally.  Over 16,000 tires were collected.

General Motors Facilities, Pontiac, Michigan

In response to a number of citizen and environmental groups' concerns regarding environmental  and
health impacts from many of the activities conducted at several General Motors facilities in past years,
EPA hosted a public meeting with all parties in an attempt to collectively resolve the issues. As  a result
of the initial meeting, the citizens and the company agreed to work toward the development of a  "Good
Neighbor" Agreement.  South East Michigan, non-profit organization, has provided support to Clean
Sites, Inc. to facilitate the discussions which have been ongoing for the past six  months.

Regional Environmental Justice Implementation Plan

The region has developed a long-term goal of "virtual elimination of disproportionate environmental
impacts on people of color and low-income communities".  To this end, environmental justice has been
identified as one of six priorities for FY97 and a Region V Environmental Justice Implementation Plan
has been developed. The Plan details all activities that the Region is undertaking to  address
environmental justice.

Regional  Geographic Initiative Teams

Several multi-media Regional Teams to address issues in key geographic areas within the Region have
been established.  These are:  the Greater Chicago Team; the Northwest Indiana Team; the Gateway


Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997                               49

-------
Team; the Southeast Michigan Team; the Northeast Ohio Team; the Upper Mississippi Team; and the
Crandon Mine Team. All of the teams cover areas that include disproportionately exposed communities.
The teams are undertaking a number of activities such as: (1) providing outreach and education, and (2)
conducting environmental cleanup and special initiatives to address concerns specific to each community
in pursuit of Environmental Justice goals.

Regional Great Lakes Teams

A number of multi-media teams are tasked with addressing issues around the Region's Great Lakes.
These teams include: Lake Michigan, Lake Superior, and Lake Ontario. Each team covers
disproportionately exposed communities, and performs activities that address the concerns of these
communities.

Sherman-Williams Consent Decree

Sherman-Williams is a resin and paint manufacturing facility in southeast Chicago.  The decree addresses
a July 1993 lawsuit which alleged violations of the Clean Air, Clean Water, Resource Conservation and
Recovery, and Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know acts. The consent decree includes a
$4.7 million penalty, $1.1 million in brownfields and wetland restoration supplemental projects, full
compliance with all statutory and regulatory requirements; closure of hazardous-waste management units
at the site; and facility-wide cleanup, including the cleanup of old landfills.  It will help to address both
health concerns and odors that have been a nuisance to the surrounding community  and help in reducing
volatile organic compounds (VOCs), ozone  and smog.

Under the agreement, the company agreed to provide $950,000 toward redeveloping a brownfield site in
the predominantly minority Victory Heights/West Pullman neighborhood and provide $150,000 to Open
Lands, an environmental group, to restore wetlands at the Indian Creek site near Lake Calumet. The
company plans to shut down solvent-based paint manufacturing at the facility in 1998 and transfer jobs to
other manufacturing facilities. However, the company is still required to carry out procedures to  assure
compliance with Federal hazardous-waste laws and install closed-cleaning equipment on all of the
solvent-based paint production vessels to control emissions of VOCs.  Ongoing violations of the CWA
ceased when the company shut down resin manufacturing operations at the facility in April 1992.  The
company also has agreed to cleanup old landfills, contaminated soil and groundwater at the facility.

Significant Environmental Justice Site - Winton Hills/Place Initiative, Cincinnati, Ohio

Region V has formed a team to address environmental justice issues in the Winton Hill/Place community
in Cincinnati, Ohio.  EPA is facilitating a series of meetings among industry, state and local government,
and community representatives to cooperatively address community concerns.
REGION VI
BACKGROUND

The Region VI Environmental Justice program has undergone a number of organizational changes over
the last year.  As a result of a Region VI reorganization, the Environmental Justice Coordinator position
was moved to the External Affairs Division; in a subsequent reorganization, the Environmental Justice
Coordinator position was moved to the Compliance Assurance and Enforcement Division.
50                               Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
MAJOR INITIATIVES

Environmental Justice Enforcement Roundtable

In collaboration with NEJAC and EPA's Office of Environmental Justice (OEJ), Region VI hosted the
first Environmental Justice Enforcement Roundtable in San Antonio, Texas on October 17 through 19,
1996. The two and a half day meeting included a bus tour of selected sites in Environmental Justice
communities, a training session, panel discussions and small-group break-out sessions. At the request of
community leaders, federal officials met with community representatives in three small group sessions to
discuss issues and concerns. The roundtable was well attended by stakeholders from grassroots
community groups, environmental organizations, academia, industry, tribal and state governments. The
event proved to be an excellent opportunity for all parties to share information and initiate
communications for constructive problem-solving.

Environmental Justice Grants

Members of the Kelly community who participated in the October 17 through 19,  1996, Environmental
Justice Enforcement Roundtable in San Antonio, received application forms for grants under the Small
Grants Program and the Community/University Partnership Grants Program for FY97. Prior to the
March 7, 1997 closing date, an application was made by the non-profit Esperanza  Peace and Justice
Center for consideration under the OEJ Small Grants offering.  Projects under this offering can be funded
up to $20,000.

Kelly Air Force Base, San Antonio, Texas

The Kelly community and a number of Kelly Air Force Base Restoration Advisory Board  (RAB)
members voiced concerns over off-site migration of ground water contamination in the East Kelly
neighborhoods, exposure to buried radiological materials at the base and potential health impacts in the
North Kelly Gardens area at the northern boundary of the base. The Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR) conducted a health  study of the community and outlined its findings.
Overall, ATSDR has found little or no correlation between local symptoms and emissions or releases
from the base.  In regards to radiation exposure, ATSDR learned there  is no exposure to radioactive
waste buried under the golf course, and there appears to be no radioactivity above background levels
detectable in areas where radioactive waste was previously buried.  Since those findings have been
released, the issue of exposure to radioactive materials has not been raised at public meetings or by the
RAB. Issuance of the final report is still pending.

Methyl Parathion

EPA Region VI has taken a proactive position to prevent, identify, and notify the public of the misuse of
methyl parathion. Methyl parathion is a potent agricultural pesticide that has been generally misused.
The Louisiana Department of Agriculture (LDA) has issued press releases and public service
announcements related to  the misuse of methyl parathion in homes and other buildings. These statements
include  a hotline telephone number established to receive reports of structures that may have been treated
with methyl parathion.  Inspectors from LDA followup on information reported on the hotline by
conducting investigations  and collecting samples from the building where methyl parathion may have
been applied. Results from sample analyses are used by the Louisiana Department of Health and
Hospitals to determine if decontamination of the building and relocation of residents are necessary.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997                               51

-------
Pesticides Program EnvironmentalJustice Accomplishments

The Region VI Pesticides Section is translating educational materials that promote proper use of
pesticides by urban residents of Fort Worth, Texas and surrounding Hispanic communities into Spanish.
The materials were developed by the Fort Worth Water Department as part of its Clean Water Program to
prevent misuse and excessive use of diazinon and other pesticides. Diazinon is commonly used by
residents in Fort Worth and surrounding areas to control fire ants.  Excessive levels of diazinon in the
city's wastewater and storm water has resulted in toxic effluent discharges. Translation of the documents
is scheduled for completion FY97.

Public Information Meetings Initiated

During the past year, the community has continued to voice concerns that the RAB has not been effective
in representing community concerns to the Air Force and regulators or in informing the community on
cleanup activities. On November 7, 1996, Kelly Air Force Base, Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission (TNRCC), and EPA held a public information meeting on the cleanup and base closure
activities. The meeting provided an opportunity for residents of the surrounding communities to review
displays concerning the progress of cleanup activities and talk to the individuals involved in the work.
The meeting was well received by those community members who participated.  The Air Force plans to
use more of these Information Fairs to keep the community informed and to provide an opportunity for
one-on-one dialogue.

Region VI EnvironmentalJustice Workgroup Initiatives

The Region VI Environmental Justice Workgroup recently completed efforts to identify FY97 initiatives
for implementation.  Included in the initiatives are the development of a well-defined structure and
implementation protocol for the Regional Environmental Justice program,  internal Environmental Justice
training, and grant-writing training for communities.

Region VI Solid Waste Tribal Assistance

EPA met with the Indian Health Service, Bureau of Indian Affairs and All Indian Pueblo Council,
InterTribal Environmental Council and several Region VI tribes and collected data to assess the progress
of the New Mexico Pueblos in meeting the October 9, 1997 deadline for closing their open dumps.
Crucial to meeting the deadline is ensuring that alternative solid waste management systems are in place
before closing the dumps. The assessment should be completed along with a listing of potential
management options, by FY97.  Region 6 is developing a strategy to assist the tribes in meeting the
October 9, 1997 deadline.

Region VI Underground Storage Tank (VST) Tribal Program Training:

The Region VI Underground Storage Tank (UST) program presented two one-day training sessions in
Oklahoma City and Tulsa, Oklahoma, for all the InterTribal Environmental Council member Tribes on
UST rules and regulations, current leak detection requirements and the UST 1998 upgrade requirements.

RSR Lead Smelter Superfund Site Tour and Meeting

At the request of Richard Moore of the Southwest Network for Environmental and Economic Justice and
Reverend R. T. Conley, EPA officials met with West Dallas residents in late September 1996. The
purpose of the meeting was to clarify EPA's position on several key issues of concern, including
relocation, recontamination during cleanup operations, long-term health care and employment
opportunities for residents during  cleanup activities. Prior to the meeting, the Deputy Regional


52                               Environmental Justice:  Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
Administrator, Jerry Clifford, Superfund and Enforcement Division Directors, Myron Knudson and Sam
Coleman, and EPA staff toured the site with Moore and Conley. EPA officials who attended the meeting
included, Tim Fields, Deputy Assistant Administrator, OSWER. Both residents and EPA officials cited
the meeting as a success, and significant commitments were made by EPA regarding job training
opportunities.

Shintech, Inc. Proposed PVC Facility

Shintech, Inc. has received permits from the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) for
the construction and operation of a polyvinyl chloride facility in Convent, Louisiana. Throughout the
permit review process some residents and environmental groups spoke out strongly opposed to the
proposed facility, alleging denial of adequate citizen participation by LDEQ and environmental racism in
the proposed citing of the facility in this largely African-American, low-income community. Another
group who  identifies itself as "Freetown residents," have expressed strong support of the proposed
facility, citing potential employment opportunities and other economic benefits. Under its one-permit
system operated under a delegated program agreement with EPA, LDEQ issued Title V and Passive
Sampling Device permits to Shintech on May 23, 1997. Tulane Law School, on behalf of St. James
Citizens for Jobs and the Environment, and other groups have filed petitions for denial/revocation of the
permits under Title V of the Clean Air Act. In another action, Tulane filed a complaint under Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act alleging discrimination on the part of LDEQ that resulted from the permit review
process and subsequent issuance of the permits.  EPA has received a similar Title V petition from the
Louisiana Environmental Action Network.

The petitions and the Title VI complaint are currently under review by EPA Region VI and Headquarters
under the direction of a steering committee and taskforce. The taskforce is reviewing pertinent
information regarding the permit and will ultimately make a recommendation on each petition and the
Title VI complaint.

Training - Deep South  Center for Environmental Justice Symposium

Under an initiative funded through an  Environmental Justice grant, the Deep South Center for
Environmental Justice hosted an Environmental Justice Symposium on November 1 and 2, 1996 in New
Orleans, Louisiana. The training, "Building Partnerships  for Empowerment through Training", provided
useful information to attendees regarding environmental issues in Environmental Justice communities.
An address was presented by the key-note speaker, Dr. Mildred McClain, of Savannah, Georgia.  The
symposium was an excellent example  of community outreach and training.
REGION VII!
BACKGROUND

Region VII has established Environmental Justice Workgroups in its division and offices and has formed
a regional Environmental Justice Council to report on, plan, and review regional environmental justice
activities. The goal is to proactively address environmental justice issues and involve environmental
justice communities in the region's processes and activities. The Region is addressing environmental
justice issues and participating in the national grant programs.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997                               53

-------
MAJOR INITIATIVES

Environmental Justice Small Grants

       •   Lead Safe Kansas City.  In 1994, EPA awarded $10,000 in grant funds to
           Leadbusters, Inc. of Kansas City, Missouri to develop a training manual. The
           product is a comprehensive guide and training manual entitled "Childhood Lead
           Poisoning: Prevention and Remediation". Leadbusters is a non-profit
           organization whose mission is to attain a lead-safe environment that prevents
           childhood lead poisoning, thereby improving the health,  economic, and social
           livability of the Greater Kansas City community. Leadbusters has been
           instrumental in providing educational materials to the public, providing lead
           abatement training, conducting lead assessments, and lead abatements in the
           Kansas City Metropolitan area. The training manual has been a useful tool in
           providing educational information to the public.

       •   Open Airways for Schools (OAS).  OAS, a school-based asthma curriculum for
           children ages 8 through 11, is a program whose goal is to help young asthmatics
           learn to manage their asthma. It is hoped that the use of this curriculum may
           result in reduction in the number asthma episodes, the number of days missed
           from school, and the number of hospital visits.  The groups involved in this
           project include the American Lung Association of Eastern Missouri, St. Louis
           City Public School Health Services, and the Zeta Phi Beta Sorority.

           Fifty-one students/participants graduated from the program on December 3,
           1994, 68% of which were African-American and 32% were Caucasian. Twenty
           two health care professional volunteers provided the training program in asthma
           management.  Full implementation of this program throughout the St. Louis City
           public elementary schools will occur over a five year period.

Outreach to Environmental Justice Communities

       •   Environmental Justice Forum.  Region Vn conducted its first Environmental
           Justice  Forum on February 28 through 29, 1996, in Kansas City, Kansas.
           "Creating Community and Economic Partnerships  - An Environmental Justice
           Forum" was co-sponsored by the International City/County Management
           Association (ICMA). The Forum was well attended and received by community
           organizations, businesses, schools, universities, and other federal agencies in
           Region VII. The second forum, co-sponsored by ICMA, was funded through a
           Cooperative Agreement with OSWER.  The Forum received positive feedback
           from external partners and EPA participants.

       •   Kansas City Exposure. EPA Region VII had a booth at this year's Kansas City
           'Exposure' (formally known  as the Black Expo). 'Exposure' was reported to
           have had an audience of about 30,000 people consisting primarily of African-
           American patrons. The booth's theme was "Be Aware of Exposure to
           Environmental Hazards."  The booth provided environmental justice information
           as well as program information pertaining to household environmental hazards.

       •   Kansas City Metropolitan Community College. The Kansas City
           Metropolitan Community College invited EPA to be a special guest at its "Social
           Problems" course on November 7, 1996. The "Social Problems" course is one of


54                               Environmental Justice:  Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
           several classes which is televised live on a local cable access channel with call-in
           lines. Three EPA employees from the Environmental Justice Program,
           Brownfields Program, and the Air/RCRA/and Toxics Division represented the
           Agency.  The courses consisted of three hours of spirited dialogue between the
           panelists and the students as well as callers from the viewing community. The
           region views this type of communication as a viable model for future outreach
           efforts.

Permits and Enforcement

       •   Company Ceases Burning Hazardous Waste-derived Fuel - Ash Grove
           Cement Co., Louisville, Nebraska. Ash Grove Cement Company entered into
           a settlement involving a civil penalty of $140,000. In September 1993, EPA
           Region VII issued an administrative action against Ash Grove for violations of
           the RCRA regulations at its Louisville, Nebraska, facility.

           On January 29, 1996, representatives of Ash Grove Cement Company met with
           the Regional Administrator, to announce its decision to drop its hazardous
           waste-derived fuel program at its Louisville, Nebraska facility. Ash  Grove cited
           economic reasons for its decision. Ash Grove declared its intention to pursue the
           use of scrap tires and other non-hazardous waste fuels at the facility. EPA and
           the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality (NDEQ) will work closely
           together to assure that proper oversight of Ash Grove's closure of its  hazardous
           waste fuel program in Louisville is properly undertaken. Ash Grove will pay a
           civil penalty of $140,000 for its RCRA violations.

           Considerable interest in the Ash Grove Louisville facility has been shown by
           members of the Louisville community. A citizen's group, known as Eastern
           Nebraskans Against Chemical Trespass has exerted considerable pressure on
           Ash  Grove, EPA, and NDEQ to require Ash Grove to cease the burning of
           hazardous waste-derived fuel at the Louisville facility.

       •   EPA Consent Decree - Osage Metals Site, Kansas City, Kansas.  On
           September 26,1996, a consent decree was entered in the District Court of
           Kansas which enables formerly contaminated industrial property to return to
           productive use. The decree requires the owner  of this Superfund site to transfer
           ownership of the site to a third party. Incorporated into this consent  decree is an
           administrative order which requires  the third party identified in the consent
           decree to pay EPA $80,000 in reimbursement for costs incurred in performing
           removal action at the site. The new owner will redevelop the  property into a
           productive business  that will generate tax revenue  for the City of Kansas City.

           The  site was formerly a scrap yard that ceased operating in 1993 after a flood
           destroyed part of the warehouse. The property  was filled with scrap and debris
           until EPA performed the removal action to cleanup the PCB and lead
           contamination in the soils. Since 1993, no commercial activity has occurred at
           the site. The City of Kansas City had an interest in restoring the property to  a
           productive state and had taken steps to condemn it in order to include the site in
           a tax incremental financing ("TIP")  district.  A  developer, W.W. Land Company,
           had an interest in buying the property and developing it. Wyandotte County had
           a $14,467.17 tax lien on the property and was taking steps to foreclose.  The area
           is located in an industrial zone surrounded by a predominately Spanish-speaking


Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997                               55

-------
           community.  Fact sheets were published in Spanish and English to acquaint
           residents with EPA's activities at the site.

           FY97 Multimedia Inspections. Utilizing the regional Geographic Information
           System (GIS), Region VII overlaid media-specific facility information such as
           location of RCRA facilities, RCRA large quantity generators, Superfund sites,
           underground storage tanks, air emission sources, and TRI releases in the St.
           Louis area with pertinent socioeconomic information.  Based on this
           information, multimedia inspection targets have been identified in areas of
           environmental justice concern.  Six multimedia inspections are planned in FY97.
           The St. Louis Metropolitan area has been designated a moderate ozone
           nonattainment area.

           South Lawrence Trafficway. Region VII has been involved with the South
           Lawrence Trafficway (SET) in Lawrence, Kansas, since 1987. The State of
           Kansas and Douglas County proposed a trafficway in Lawrence near Haskell
           Indian Nations University, and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
           provided Federal cost-sharing for the trafficway. EPA became involved as part
           of the NEPA process as a  cooperating agency. Upon completion of an
           Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the trafficway in 1990, an alignment
           was selected (31st Street)  which is adjacent to the part of the Haskell campus
           where sweat lodges and a  Medicine Wheel are located. In 1993, a coalition of
           Haskell students and alumni informed the FHWA that the EIS did not adequately
           consider the impacts to the cultural and spiritual life of the Haskell community.
           As a result, Haskell requested that a Supplemental EIS (SEIS) be undertaken to
           respond to their concerns. In 1994, the FHWA, the State of Kansas, and Douglas
           County (the project sponsors) agreed to Haskell's request.

           The SEIS evaluated two alternative alignments, 35th Street and 38th Street in
           addition to the previously selected 31 st Street. The 35th Street alignment would
           bi-sect the Baker Wetland Complex, and there are environmental and floodplain
           problems associated with the 38th Street site. The State of Kansas and Douglas
           County have indicated that they prefer the 31 st street alignment. FHWA
           officials have attempted to withdraw from the NEPA process and "de-federalize"
           the SET project. As a result of de-federalization and withdrawal from the NEPA
           process, the Haskell Coalition challenged the project sponsors in Federal District
           Court. On July 17, 1997, the court ruled against the project sponsors and
           enjoined work on the eastern leg of the South Lawrence Trafficway prior to
           completion of a SEIS.
REGION VIII

BACKGROUND

In October 1995, Region VIE reorganized to provide better quality environmental protection and more
efficient utilization of regional resources. The major changes in the reorganization reflected: 1)
movement from a solely statutory organizational structure to a functional structure; 2) more effective
partnerships with states, tribes, and local communities; 3) consolidation of enforcement and compliance
programs; 4) a focus on community-based environmental protection; and 5) a point of accountability for
environmental justice. An Environmental Justice Program was created and staffed with a Program
Director and five full-time employees. The Regional Environmental Justice Work Group, which was
created before the reorganization still exists. Some of its members are still active in environmental
justice activities.
56                               Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
MAJOR INITIATIVES

Enforcement, Compliance, and Related Activities

        •   Environmental Justice Protocols for Inspection Targeting. The protocols were
           developed for targeting programmatic inspections while incorporating environmental
           justice considerations. The system is elegant in its simplicity, relying on readily
           available information in the regional GIS system to rank all facilities in a given sector
           using specific environmental justice criteria. The criteria includes demographics (for
           example, population density, income data, and racial designation) and a surrogate factor
           for potential disproportionate risk (number of facilities reporting under CERCLA,
           RCRA, or TRI within a one-mile radius).  While the protocols were developed for the
           FY96 inspection activities, because of government furloughs and lack of travel budget
           for inspections, they were not fully utilized.  For FY97, discussions have begun with the
           enforcement programs to ensure the protocols are applied.

        •   National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Reviews. The Region invested resources
           in the NEPA process which incorporates environmental justice considerations in major
           federal actions. The Region's staff is in contact with regional NEPA staff, national
           NEPA training efforts, and national NEPA guidance initiatives to incorporate
           environmental justice considerations into these processes. EPA staff organized a
           half-day environmental justice segment in a recent three-day NEPA class given in
           Region VIII.  In addition, for the Zortman-Landusky environmental impact statement
           (EIS) on the expansion of a mine and heap leach facility adjacent to the Fort Belknap
           Reservation in Montana, our staff provided comments identifying environmental justice
           considerations that needed to be addressed in the NEPA process.  These considerations
           included treaty issues, and cultural and religious utilization of resources that maybe
           impacted by the mine expansion.

Interagency Collaborations

The Region has scheduled a meeting with the Denver area Federal Agency Environmental Justice Task
Force to bring members up-to-date and explore ways of making the task force relevant to the federal
community.

Outreach to Environmental Justice Communities

The Region has conducted extensive outreach to community groups in Region VIII, as well as
presentations on environmental justice at national meetings. Outreach activities have  included
consultation and research on specific issues, presentations about environmental justice, sharing of
resources, participating in community meetings, and obtaining speakers for informational meetings. In
addition, the Region maintains an interactive data base of organizations and individuals interested in
receiving information about environmental justice, such as grants and meeting announcements.  The
database has been used to send out grant announcements for other EPA programs, such as environmental
education.  The Region is currently planning a one-day conference with grass-roots organizations,
community leaders, local environmental groups, and development representatives to address the role of
communities in redevelopment.

Environmental Justice Small Grants activities include radon testing, migrant farm worker bilingual safety
training and education, assistance in drafting tribal environmental codes, a bibliography titled
"Environmental Justice: An Indian Country Guide," and environmental  education. An exceptional grant
activity involves collaboration with HUD to design and build energy efficient houses incorporating
native design elements and construction materials for the Rosebud Reservation in South Dakota.
Regional staff also has developed a reference book for tribal and grass-roots  organizations providing
information on EPA grants programs.


Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997                               57

-------
Outreach, Training, and Internal EPA Development

       •   Environmental Justice Applications (GIS model). The model was developed to
           address the need to respond quickly to requests for site-specific information about
           environmental justice concerns. The model is available on staff computers and permits a
           quick identification of site demographics and mapping of other permitted facilities in the
           area. The model displays maps depicting the site and the location of nearby permitted
           facilities as well as demographic information on disproportionately exposed populations.
           In addition, it creates a report listing demographic data and the names of permitted
           facilities that are shown on the map. The model also is being used to research new
           environmental justice issues and areas of concern. The model is also currently being
           used by the Region VIE Superfund program to prioritize management of new sites.

       •   Environmental Justice Deliberative  Process for Involvement in Site Specific Cases.
           The program was developed to identify factors that would highlight disproportionate
           exposure issues with environmental justice considerations. A discussion sheet was
           developed that sets out a deliberative process for staff and others to use to determine if
           environmental justice program involvement is appropriate in site specific cases. The
           decision process directs staff to consider demographics, disproportionate risk, access to
           information, and comparable situations.  While this deliberative process is not needed for
           every environmental justice concern that is raised, it has become a valuable tool to
           provide a consistent decision-making process and to assist other staff in thinking through
           environmental justice issues.

       •   Environmental Justice Search Conference. In April 1996, Region VIII hosted a
           region-wide  two-day meeting to develop an environmental justice strategic plan for
           1996-1997.  Approximately 45 people attended, including state, tribal, and grass-roots
           representatives as well as managers and staff from the regional offices. A strategic plan
           was adopted by the Region in the summer of 1996.  A unique aspect of the plan is its
           identification of activities for other programs within the regional offices to undertake in
           implementing environmental justice goals.
REGION IX
BACKGROUND

The EPA Region IX Environmental Justice Team has a vision of empowered communities taking the lead
in designing and implementing the environmental decisions which impact them directly. Such
empowerment is based on vibrant cultural practices and values articulated at the community level, and
that environmental and governmental knowledge supports the community's efforts to direct the course of
their lives.

       •   To support this vision, the region has identified the following goals:

       •   Target EPA efforts in communities most at risk.

       •   Integrate environmental justice across all EPA media programs.

       •   Provide training, technical assistance and funding to develop communities'
           capacities to become effective participants in making environmental decisions
           that affect their lives.
58                               Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
At all levels in EPA Region IX, from the senior management level to the staff level, there is a
commitment to listen and learn from the communities we serve in order to achieve environmental and
public health protection.

MAJOR INITIATIVES

Environmental Justice and Brownflelds Redevelopment

Environmental justice is an inherent and integral part of brownfields redevelopment. The Environmental
Justice Team, the Brownfields Team, as well as community groups, nonprofit organizations and private
sector entities are working together to ensure the institutionalization of environmental justice within
brownfields redevelopment programs and projects in the Region.

In FY97, an Environmental Justice Small  Grant was awarded to a non-profit organization in San
Francisco called The Urban Habitat Program (a project of the Earth Island Institute) to support their
efforts to ensure that communities are effective players in the brownfields redevelopment projects in the
Region. Region IX is an active participant in the Bay Area Regional Brownfields Working Group (a
regional collaborative of community, public and private sector representatives) which works to develop
regionally sustainable and environmentally just strategies for brownfields redevelopment.  In addition,
members of the Environmental Justice Team have moderated panels at the 1997 National Brownfields
Conference in Kansas City, as well as two regional brownfields workshops in San Francisco and
Richmond, California. The Team was a member of the Brownfields Advisory Board for the  San
Francisco Regional Brownfield Pilot and provided presentations on environmental justice and
brownfields to the American Bar Association Annual Conference and at the University of California
Berkeley City and Regional Planning Department.

Environmental Justice Training

For the past two years, the Environmental Justice Team in Region IX has conducted a series  of
environmental justice training sessions  for EPA staff. The purpose of the environmental justice training
is to 1) raise awareness and knowledge  of environmental justice issues, and 2) share insights and
approaches to incorporate environmental justice concepts into daily work. The environmental justice
training is designed to encourage participant interaction through lecture, interactive exercises, and
brainstorming sessions. Currently, the Region offers two types of environmental justice training.  First, a
general regional wide environmental justice training course is offered monthly to discuss concepts,
theories, and applications, of environmental justice.  Second, a divisional or media specific
environmental justice training course is conducted which focuses on strategic planning and
implementation of environmental justice in daily operations.

Funding for Environmental Justice Communities

From FY94 through FY97, the Region funded 57 environmental justice small grants totaling $1 million.
Some examples of funded projects include:

        •   Lead poisoning education and outreach in San Francisco's Mission District

        •   Emergency planning for citizens of West Oakland

        •   Fund ongoing environmental  safety education for Asian women immigrants in
           the electronics industries

        •   Train and certify farm workers as pesticide educators and environmental health
           advocates

        •   Set up a used oil recycling station on Hopi Land


Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997                               59

-------
General Plan Project

Over the past two years, EPA, through the Environmental Justice Program Liaisons has presented
recommendations to two California cities (Los Angeles and Oakland) undergoing general plan revisions,
to encourage incorporation of environmental justice language into their revised plans.  Los Angeles
incorporated many of the recommendations into their final plan.  Oakland's plan is still in the draft stages
and is undergoing citizen review. EPA's Region IX senior staff recommended that the region expand its
efforts to supply city planners with information and recommendations by including such topics as
sustainability, pollution prevention, and public transit. A workgroup has been formed to research the
kinds of information currently available and to develop supplementary information on the integration of
environmental justice into the city planning process.

Grant Workshops conducted in Arizona, Los Angeles, San Diego and Oakland

The environmental justice team conducted a series of environmental justice grants workshops throughout
the Region to clarify the process involved in applying for an environmental justice small grant. Each
workshop was co-hosted by local community groups from the local areas in which they were presented:
South Tucson, Dont Waste Arizona, in Los Angeles, Concerned  Citizens of South Central, Mothers of
East Los Angeles, and Communities for a Better Environment,  in San Diego, Environmental Health
Coalition, and in Oakland, the African American Development Corporation and Asian Pacific
Environmental Network.

McFarland, California

Several residents of McFarland, California, a small and predominantly Latino community, petitioned
EPA in  1995 to  conduct an environmental assessment due to ongoing health problems in the town. In
1984, a  cluster of childhood cancers was identified in McFarland and confirmed by state and local heath
agencies.  Past investigations (1984-1991), conducted by the California Department of Health Services,
with assistance  from EPA, focused on determining a cause for the cancers but were inconclusive.

In reviewing past data, EPA found that insufficient air sampling was conducted to adequately assess the
air conditions, and drinking water was not analyzed for all pesticides used in the area.  Therefore, EPA
has granted the  petition's request for an investigation of the air, water, and soil. The investigation will
focus on the current environmental conditions in McFarland. The investigation will not focus on
determining the cause of the cancers, since conditions of the past cannot be reconstructed; however, EPA
will coordinate  activities and share the results of the investigation with health agencies.

Phase One of the McFarland project plan has been completed.  Members of the McFarland team have
interviewed residents and civic leaders  in McFarland over the past five months to identify community
concerns and collect information for the Community Involvement Plan and sampling plans to ensure that
the current investigation is as comprehensive as possible. House visits have been very helpful in
establishing a connection with community groups, the residents and schools. Phase Two, the
investigation of environmental conditions, is now underway. The drinking water is the first media that
will be investigated.  Drinking water wells will be sampled for over three hundred chemicals.  Pesticide
Use Reports have been reviewed to determine the type and quantities of pesticides used in the McFarland
area to guide the sampling and analysis of the water. Drinking water wells and the storage tank used by
the community  were sampled in July of 1997. In early 1998, sampling of drinking water taps in the
public schools, parks, and public buildings, as well as some residentials taps will be sampled.  The active
drinking water wells and storage tank will be resampled again at this time.  Fact sheets in English and
Spanish have been distributed to community members to describe EPA's proposed drinking water
sampling program. Open Houses/community meetings have been conducted to present the sampling
plans and answer questions raised by community members.

EPA currently is developing the sampling plans for air monitoring and soil investigations. The air
monitoring designs are being developed with input from EPA's Office of Research and Development and


60                               Environmental Justice:  Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
the California Air Resources Board. Air monitoring currently is being planned to include sampling
during the fall and spring seasons to cover periods when pesticide use is at its peak Soil sampling
currently is planned for the summer of 1998.

New Team Members

Because EPA Region IX has made a commitment to bring people into the Agency with extensive
community experience, the Region recently expanded its environmental justice team by adding two
members. The new members came to the Agency from the Urban Habitat Program and the three Circles
Center for Multicultural Environmental Education, organizations that have a strong focus on
environmental justice issues and communities.  The unique perspectives of the new members will  help
Region IX not only institutionalize environmental justice within the region, but also assist with work
currently being conducted with grassroots environmental justice organizations.

Outreach to Communities and Environmental Justice Presentations

Region IX conducted a series of outreach meetings with community based organizations and conducted
presentations on environmental justice at various conferences and forums. The outreach meetings were
designed to assess environmental justice concerns, to develop viable strategies to address those concerns,
and to foster strong working relationships. The outreach meetings were conducted in Los Angeles, San
Diego, the San Francisco Bay Area, and South Phoenix. The groups met with include the Environmental
Health Coalition, the Asian Pacific Environmental Network, Communities for a Better Environment,
Don't Waste Arizona, the Arizona Environmental Justice Advisory Council, Mothers  of East Los
Angeles, the First African Episcopal Methodist Church of Los Angeles, the Community Coalition for
Change and the Southwest Network for Environmental and Economic Justice.

In addition, the Region has participated in various conferences and forums to communicate the
importance of environmental justice.  Conferences and forums attended include the "Federal Facilities
Conference", the "American Bar Association Annual Conference", the "Association  of Environmental
Professionals", the "International Right of Way Association", the "American Association for the
Advancement of Science", the "Upward Bound Program", and the "Second Annual Youth Leadership
Summit".

Program Specific Environmental Justice Strategies

To fully integrate  environmental justice considerations to work done by Region IX, each of the Divisions
and Offices has developed an environmental justice strategy.  The strategies provide staff with guidance
on how to implement environmental justice into day to day activities of the Region. Strategies have been
developed for the  Air Division, Water Division, Cross Media Division, Superfund Division, Waste
Management Division, Office of Government and Community Relations, Office of Strategic Planning
and Emerging Issues and the Policy and Management Division.  Each strategy covers  the main activities
of the various programs from an  environmental justice perspective such as planning and targeting,
enforcement, permitting, training, grants, and policy issues.

RCRA 's  Work on Title VI Complaints

EPA is investigating two Title VI complaints involving RCRA facilities in California. Investigators
include EPA Title VI Task Force attorneys and technical staff from Region IX. The complaints allege
discriminatory impact in the permit actions taken by the Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC): one complaint  addresses three hazardous waste landfills and the other complaint addresses a
hazardous waste storage  and recycling facility.  All four facilities are near Latino communities.  Since
January 1997, the Task Force and Regional staff have made progress on the complaints.  EPA obtained
preliminary demographic data to be used in determining whether hazardous waste  facilities are located in
predominantly Latino  communities. Region IX has reviewed environmental and health assessment
documents such as Environmental Impact Reports, health risk assessments, and epidemiological studies


Environmental Justice:  Working Toward Solutions -August 1997                               61

-------
to determine what adverse health effects or other effects may result from the facilities. In addition, EPA
conducted site visits and community interviews to gather specific information on the alleged adverse
impacts due to the facilities.  After performing additional file reviews and speaking with representatives
from DTSC and other state and local agencies about the allegations, EPA will prepare preliminary
findings regarding the allegations.

Regional Assessment Project

The Region's GIS assessment involves the processing and mapping of census (demographic) and
environmental data in order to identify communities in the Region where EPA resources should be
targeted. To date, all of the census data are processed and mapped, and a portion of the environmental
data has been updated and is available for analysis/mapping. The Region has decided to refocus its effort
to map all data for the entire Region and will instead pursue efforts at more targeted analyses focusing on
smaller geographic areas and within single media programs. In the coming year, the environmental
justice program will encourage the media  divisions to make effective use of the available demographic
data in order to identify areas of environmental justice focus within their programs, and will continue
meeting with and gathering input from key environmental justice stakeholders about regional
communities that need additional focus from EPA.

Ward Valley, California

EPA is working with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Colorado River Native Nations
Alliance to address issues raised by the siting of a low level radiation  disposal facility in Ward Valley,
California. The Fort Mojave, Chemehuevi, Colorado River, Quechan, and the Cocopah are concerned
about the facility's impact on their cultural and religious practices as well as the potential environmental
impacts. EPA has met with the tribes and facilitated discussions with the tribes and BLM.  In May of
1997, the National Environmental Justice  Advisory Council (NEJAC) passed a resolution requesting
EPA to take an active role in working with BLM.

BLM, the lead agency, is drafting a Supplemental Environmental Statement which will examine both the
ecological and environmental justice issues. Under the Environmental Justice Executive Order 12898,
Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and our federal trust responsibilities, EPA is playing a constructive role
in helping to ensure all issues are evaluated and government to government consultation is established
with the tribes. The Region's Office of Federal Activities, the Environmental Justice and Tribal
programs will provide input  to BLM on the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement including the
environmental justice analysis. The Ward Valley issue is an example of EPA cross media collaboration
and interagency cooperation on environmental justice.

Watsonville, California Rural Environmental Justice Pilot Project

As a community-based project, participation by residents and community groups living in Watsonville,
California is crucial to the success of the pilot project. Furthermore, the involvement of other regulatory
agencies is critical to help  identify and implement environmental solutions. The Watsonville pilot
project team has met with  several community and regulatory representatives to discuss current issues in
Watsonville.  These representatives include:  City and County staff, farm worker advocate groups,
housing advocate groups, and environmental groups.

To achieve the goal of bringing all stakeholders together, the Watsonville pilot project team has been
working with community and regulatory representatives and various Regional EPA program staff (for
example, water, air, and pesticide specialists) to prioritize issues and develop preliminary
recommendations based on available information. The  project team also has enlisted the participation of
state and local counterparts to attain a better understanding  of the studies and projects on issues that may
already have been conducted.
62                                Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
Issues raised during discussions between the Watsonville pilot project team and community and
regulatory representatives, include concerns about drinking water, indoor air, farmworker conditions,
and housing. Further discussions were held to determine the extent to which issues raised should be of
concern to the community. Air and water issues, in particular, were identified as non-significant. Based
on the discussions, the project team has decided to focus on two key issues facing the Watsonville
community: Farm worker safety and housing.

The strategy of the Watsonville pilot project team has been to act as a facilitator as stakeholders are
brought together to work toward solutions to issues facing Watsonville. The project team already has
held meetings with local stakeholders (State, County, City and community representatives) to discuss
farm worker occupational issues. These meetings have served as an opportunity to exchange information
on the various projects being conducted in the Watsonville/Pajaro area.

The Watsonville pilot project team recently convened an interagency  meeting with the HUD to discuss
housing issues in Watsonville. As personnel within EPA, which has an environmental mandate, the
project team recognizes its limited experience concerning housing issues, and is relying heavily on the
expertise of others brought to the meeting.  The project team also invited several agencies which deal
specifically with housing issues, including the County Housing Authority and City housing staff. The
project team also is looking to community members to share knowledge and experience that has proven
invaluable at previous meetings.

As a follow-up to these meetings, the Watsonville pilot project team is planning further meetings with
other stakeholders to identify actual  solutions to issues of concern. For example, the project team will
work with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Rural Development office, the Rural
Community Assistance Corporation, and local planning entities to address housing needs in Watsonville.
The project team also  will continue to work with the California Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (Cal-OSHA) and other regulators in regards to farm worker safety issues.

West  Oakland Urban  Environmental Justice Pilot Project

EPA currently is investigating a full  range of environmental and related issues affecting the West
Oakland community through the new urban environmental justice pilot project. In partnership with
residents, local and state government agencies, and other parties, EPA is working to identify and
prioritize the issues and develop a strategy to solve them. Major issues of concern are contaminated soil
and ground water, air quality and lead, in conjunction with local planning and zoning issues, lack of
communication, and health concerns.

In compliance with information-gathering and community-networking goals, EPA facilitated focus group
meetings to attain the  community's perspective on environmental issues. A wide variety of issues were
raised in these meetings, including concerns regarding zoning, contamination from past and present
industrial activities, truck traffic, and perceived impacts of the new Cypress freeway construction. In
addition, a  Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
(CERCLIS) records search was conducted to assist the City of Oakland's Community Building Teams
(CBT) efforts to avoid siting grassroots vacant lot beautification projects on contaminated areas.

In October  1996, EPA became involved in an environmental task force, which was established after vinyl
chloride contamination was found in an industrial property adjacent to residential property. Comprised
of residents, regulators, and other environmental health professionals, the task force meets monthly in an
attempt to give a more coordinated response to community concerns and consequently, to develop a long-
term collaborative strategy for addressing environmental concerns in West Oakland.

In April 1997, in coordination with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, the Port of Oakland
placed two air monitors to collect data on particulate (PM-10  and PM-2.5) issues raised by the
community in regards to truck traffic.
Environmental Justice:  Working Toward Solutions -August 1997                                63

-------
In May 1997, the Chester Street Block Club association of the South Prescott neighborhood in West
Oakland, filed a Title VI Complaint against the California Department of Transportation and the
California Department of Toxic Substance Control in response to concerns related to the Cypress
Freeway construction. If accepted, this complaint will be reviewed by EPA headquarters in coordination
with the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).

In June 1997, the regulators and other participating agencies met to discuss the need for a more proactive
approach to community involvement and environmental management. The group also will meet monthly
to develop a coordinated environmental management strategy that maybe used in other communities.
REGION X

BACKGROUND

In addition to the regional Environmental Justice Coordinator, a senior staff member is responsible for
managing the regional environmental justice program and program/project Environmental Justice
Coordinators are assigned to specific projects. The region also established an Environmental Justice
Core Group in 1994.  This group includes representatives from all divisions and serves as an advisory
board to the region, providing guidance on a variety of issues, such as environmental justice
coordination, policy issues, grants, and training.

MAJOR INITIA TIVES

The Region continues to develop and encourage program offices to use specific tools (for example,
Superfund demographic fact sheets) to ensure that information more effectively reaches environmental
justice target communities. Data on a number of facilities in communities of color and a broad range of
demographic data were provided to make outreach more inclusive. This type of outreach training effort
is focused on EPA staff gaining a more complete and comprehensive understanding of the community,
increasing interactions and communication with Environmental Justice populations and, changing how
EPA conducts outreach and interact with communities.

Enforcement Efforts

Environmental justice is a factor in multi-media  targeting. Early in FY97, the Region X Environmental
Justice Office presented an environmental justice training module on "Environmental Justice  and
Enforcement," and a module on Title VI.

Environmental Justice Interagency Collaborations

Region X has worked with tribal governments, the Corps of Engineers, Washington State Department of
Ecology, several county agencies and the City of Seattle to deliver environmental justice education. A
primary goal for FY97 is to increase other federal agencies understanding of environmental justice to
spur the inclusion of Environmental Justice principles in their activities.  This will be accomplished by
developing training modules designed specifically to meet the agencies' needs and that provides critical
environmental justice information. Staff from other government agencies also attended Environmental
Justice Education & Awareness sessions conducted for the EPA audience.

Grant to the Odessa Brown Children's Clinic Asthma Management Support Center, Seattle,
Washington

Assistance and grant support was made for asthma/indoor air outreach and education, and medical
intervention in Seattle's Central Area, a predominantly low-income minority community, with the highest
asthma incidence and hospitalization rate in Western Washington. The grant, funded by the Air Program,
is an example of the increased number of collaborative efforts with health professionals working with

64                               Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997

-------
environmental justice communities. The project is part of a nationwide study in seven cities around the
country to further evaluate the effectiveness of coordinated care and environmental interventions in
reducing asthma morbidity among inner city children.  As a result of this support, progress is being made
toward achieving the expected outcome of increased awareness and competence in asthma management
in 15 pediatric and family practices in Washington State.  Implementation of specific asthma
management strategies in these practices, evaluation of practice efforts, geo-coded maps with
corresponding reports identifying areas with a high density of asthmatics will facilitate the design of an
optimal intervention strategy.

Outreach Efforts to Environmental Justice Communities

The Regional Environmental Justice Office and designated environmental justice contacts in the media
program  offices conducted outreach to v communities. In a 4 month period, the Environmental Justice
Office had over 151 interactions with Environmental Justice community groups/nonprofits and tribal
representatives to provide technical and policy advice, exchange information, and to increase
education/awareness on environmental justice.

Based on data gaps identified by Environmental Justice communities, the regional office completed
analytical work, facilitated community meetings or other actions as identified by the communities. For
example, the Environmental Justice Office facilitated two Environmental Justice community group
meetings and completed the Alaska Military Sites project at the request of community groups.  The
Region's facilitation of an environmental justice meeting reflects on the positive working relationship it
has established with Environmental Justice community groups.

Public Participation, Accountability, Partnerships, Outreach and Communication with Stakeholders

Preparation of demographic information for Superfund Sites in Idaho, Oregon and Washington continues.
The Region X Environmental Justice Office obtained demographic information for superfund sites.  The
one page per site sheets provide site managers with information on population density, race, ethnicity,
income, number of non-English speaking residents and percentages of residents speaking languages other
than English. With the demographic data, site managers are able to better design communication
activities, improve residents' involvement, and acquire a better understanding of the population diversity
in Region X.

Site specific demographic information was identified as a need by the Superfund program and  was well
received  in the Region. Responding to an identified need increased the likelihood that the product will
be utilized.  One of the primary environmental justice goals is to make environmental justice principles
an integral part of all regional activities. To achieve this goal, it would be beneficial to involve EPA staff
to identify needs and develop tools tailored to these issues.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions -August 1997                               65

-------
                                         APPENDIX I   EPA NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVISORY COUNCIL
                                                         SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
                                                                   1997-1998
                                                          STAKEHOLDER BREAKDOWN
AC = Academia
*Denotes NEJAC Council Member
            CG = Community Group
          NEJAC Chair
          SL = State/Local Govt.
          EV = Environmental Group
TR = Tribal     IN = Industry
     NG = Nongovernmental Organization
Enforcement Subcommittee -
SL   Lillian Mood, R.N. (3)
SL   Arthur Ray* (1), Chair
AC   Gerald Torres* (3)
EV   David Harris (3)
IN   Leslie Beckoff * (2 )
AC   Grover  Hankins* (1)
CG   Peggy M. Shepard (1)
CG   Rita Harris (3)
NG   Lamont Byrd  (2)
NG   Luke Cole* (2)
NG   Richard T. Drury (2)
-11 members (6 NEJAC)
       South Carolina Dept. of Health
       Maryland Department of the Environment
       University of Texas School of  Law
       Land Loss Prevention Project
       Conoco  Inc./DuPont
       Texas Southern University
            West Harlem Env. Action, Inc.
       Mid-South Peace & Justice Center
       Teamsters
       CA Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
       Communities for a Better Environ.
Health and Research Subcommittee -
AC  Douglas M. Brugge (1 )
CG  Margaret Williams * (2)
AC  Marinelle Payton (2 )
AC  Mary English* (1), Chair
EV  Carlos Porras (3)
SL  Michael J. DiBartolomeis (3)
IN   Eugene M. Peters (3)
NG  Andrew McBride (1)
SL  Rosa Franklin * (2)
NG  PenS. Loh(1)
TR  Don Aragon* (3)
SL  R. Lewis Shaw* (3)
       - 12 members (5 NEJAC)
       Tufts School of Medicine
       Citizens Against Toxic Exposure
       Harvard Medical School
       University of Tennessee
       Communities for a Cleaner Environment
       California EPA
       Clean Sites, Inc.
       Connecticut Lead Center
       Washington State Senate
       Alternatives for Comm. & Environ.
       Shoshone and Northern Arapaho Tribes
       South Carolina Dept. of Health and
          and Environmental Control
Indigenous Peoples -- 9 members
TR  James D. Hill * (2), Chair
TR  Charles Stringer (1)
AC  Richard Monette (1)
IN   Astel Cavanaugh (1)
AC  George Godfrey (3)
NG  Sarah James (3), Elder
SL  Brad Hamilton (3)
TR  Dwayne Beavers (2)
TR  Christine Benally* (1)
     ( 2 NEJAC)
        Klamath Tribe
        White Mountain Apache
        Univ. Of Wisconsin
        Sioux Manufacturing  Corp.
        Haskell Nations University
        Gwich'in Steering Committee
        State of Kansas
        Cherokee Nation
        Sanostee Chapter of the  Navaho Nation
                 International ~8 members (2 NEJAC)
                 NG   Janet Phoenix (2)
                 NG   Baldemar Velasquez* (1) Chair
                 SL   Beth Hailstock (3)
                 IN    ClydiaCuykendall(3)
                 AC   Maria del Carmen Libran (3)
                 CG   Mildred McClain (1)
                 TR   Bill Simmons (1)
                 EV   Arnoldo Garcia * (2)
            National Safety Council
            Farm Labor Organizing Committee
            Cincinnati Health Department
            Star Enterprise (Texaco)
            University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez
            Citizens for Environmental Justice
            International Indian Treaty Council
            Earth Island Institute
                                                Public Participation and Accountability —9 members (4 NEJAC)
                 NG   Frank Coss(1)
                 EV   Munir Meghjee (2)
                 CG   Delbert Dubois (3)

                 AC   Robert Holmes (3)
                 SL   Annabelle Jaramillo*
                 IN    Lawrence Hurst* (1)
                 NG   Haywood Turrentine'
                 TR   Mamie Rupnicki (3)
                 CG   Rosa Hilda Ramos*
            COTICAM (Puerto Rico)
            Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund
            Four Mile Hibberian Community
                Association, Inc.
            Clark Atlanta University
 (3)         Office of the Governor, State of Oregon
            Motorola, Inc.
 *(1)        Laborers Education Training Trust Fund
            Prairie Band of Potawatomi Tribe, Kansas
(2)          Community of Cantano Against Pollution
                 Waste and Facility Siting Subcommittee  —14 members  (7 NEJAC)
                 CG   DollieBurwell*(1)
                 SL   Lillian Kawasaki * (1)
                 IN    Sue Briggum * (2)
                 NG   Mathy Stanislaus (2)

                 NG   Charles Lee* (1) (Chair)

                 NG   Connie Tucker (1)
                 EV   Ricardo Soto-Lopez (2)
                 IN    Gerald R. Prout * (2)
                 AC   Michael K. Holmes (3)
                 EV   Jean Belille* (3)
                 EV   Vernice Miller (3)
                 EV   Damon Whitehead* (3)
                 NG   Brenda Lee Richardson (3)
                 CG   Cynthia Jennings (3)
            Warren County Concerned Citizens
            Los Angeles Department of Environment
            WMX
            Environmental-Sciences/Minority
            Environmental Lawyers Association
            UC of Christ Commission for Racial
            Justice
            Southern Organizing Committee
            Puerto Rico-Northeast EJ Network
            FMC Corporation
                 St. Louis Community College
            Western Communities Program
            Natural  Resources Defense Council
            Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund
            Women Like Us
            ONE/CHANE
(1) - Term expires 7/31/1998
   (2) - Term expires 7/31/1999
(3) - Term expires 12/31/2000
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
            NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVISORY COUNCIL

The National Environmental Justice Advisory Council (NEJAC) was initially chartered September 30,1993,
with the express purpose of advising the EPA Administrator of environmental problems which occurred in
communities either disadvantaged or racially under-represented, or both, and which have been sited for an
inordinate number of potential polluting sources.

Over the past four years the NEJAC, which includes the six subcommittees as well as the executive council,
has held 51 official meetings at eight sites; and numerous conference calls and working sessions for purposes
of collecting information about a variety of specific events. Please refer to the information which follows
for a description of the purpose of each subcommittee along with highlights of each one's major activities.

Executive Council - consists of 25  individuals selected so as to represent the seven major stakeholder
categories: academia, community organizations, industry, state/local governments, tribal governments, non-
government organizations, and environmental organizations.  The Executive  Council  convenes to  review
resolutions prepared in subcommittee and to hear public comments during the Public Comment Period held
during each meeting, normally two nights for at least two hours each night.
ENFORCEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE
ACTIVITIES

Provides  recommendations  to  the  Agency  for
promoting environmental justice in the programs
through  policies and  activities  of the Office of
Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. A primary
focus of this subcommittee is relationships at the
federal, state, local  and tribal levels.  A list of the
activities follows.

Developed documents on the following subjects:

•    Issued  statement of purpose that  enhances the
     NEJAC  purpose  statement   and   incorporates
     enforcement-specific concepts and action items.
     (August 1994)

•    Issued work plan for providing recommendations
     to the Office of Enforcement and Compliance
     Assurance   (OECA) regarding  integration  of
     environmental justice into  its programs, policies
     and activities. (August 1994)

•    Issued  initial draft report of the Enforcement
     Subcommittee providing general recommendations
     in four major areas:
     (1)  direct federal  enforcement,  (2) direct  state
     enforcement, (3) tribal/indigenous enforcement, (4)
     community   enforcement  and  (5) workforce
     diversity.  (December 1994)

•    Provided  comments on  the enforcement  and
     compliance  section   of the   EPA's  Draft
     Environmental Justice Strategy.
Issued  second draft  report of the Enforcement
Subcommittee expanding the Initial Draft Report
and providing recommendations including an in-
depth  analysis   of  OECA  office-specific
enforcement and compliance workplans.

Issued  final  draft report  of  the Enforcement
Subcommittee and submitted to the  NEJAC.
(November 1995)

Issued  final  report,  "Achieving  Environmental
Protection:  Compliance,   Enforcement   and
Environmental Justice" to EPA.

Prepared   draft   memorandum  to   EPA  on
"Integrating  Environmental  Justice  into  EPA
Permitting Authority."

Prepared  draft resolutions  forwarded to the full
NEJAC   for  vote.     These  included
recommendations in the following areas:

—    Establishment of labor  representation
     on the NEJAC,
—    Request for Presidential endorsement of
     Basel  Convention   authorizing
     legislation,
—    Request for EPA action on Title VI of
     the 1964 Civil Rights Act,
—    Request that  EPA refrain from  doing
     business with contractors engaged in
     labor disputes,
—    Request  that  EPA   undertake  a
     comprehensive  survey of its existing
     statutory and regulatory authority to
     promote  environmental justice  under
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
               each of the specific environmental
               pollution control laws, and
     —    Request   that   EPA   give   due
          consideration of the effect  of its air
          emissions   trading   program   on
          communities of color and low-income
          communities.
     —    Request   that    EPA   prioritize
          enforcement and compliance targeting
          for environmental justice communities,
     —    Request  that  EPA  coordinate   the
          Integrated  Data  for  Enforcement
          Actions (IDEA) system with other data
          bases and prioritize community access
          and use of these integrated systems.

Sponsored key activities:

•    Enforcement and Compliance Roundtable held in
     EPA Region VI in San Antonio, Texas. This event
     also featured community training on enforcement
     and compliance and an environmental justice site
     tour.

•    Initiated   planning   process  for  a  second
     enforcement and compliance roundtable in EPA
     Region IV.

•    Initiated briefing on IDEA system by OECA staff
     and recommended that this and other data bases be
     integrated to prioritize community accesses to and
     use of these integrated systems.

Provided review, comment and recommendations on
the following materials:

•    Enforcement-related recommendations from  the
     "Health   Research   and   Needs   to  Ensure
     Environmental   Justice"  conference   held  in
     February 1994.

•    OECA Potential  EJ  Projects List  or  matrix of
     potential projects reflecting  plans  for activities
     from each OECA office.

•    OECA "Partners in Protection" draft concept paper
     on enhancing public participation in enforcement
     and compliance assurance activities.

•    Provided recommendations to the full NEJAC on
     community issues raised during public comment
     periods.

Formed ad hoc workgroups on issues including:

•    Nuclear permitting and NEPA - Homer, LA,
     Community involvement in enforcement - San
     Juan, PR,
•    Federal interagency coordination - Carver Terrace,
     TX,
•    International waste  trade  and EPA PCB  rule,
     Pesticides on Native American lands - California
     Basketweavers TSCA petition,
•    Environmental enforcement/transborder issues -
     New River TSCA petition,
•    Illegal waste imports - South Africa provinces.

Created Enforcement Subcommittee Workgroups for
in-depth analysis of the environmental justice issues
related to the following activities:

Worker  Protection,  Open  Market  Trading  of Air
Emissions Credits,  Permitting Process,  and Policy on
Supplemental Environmental Projects

HEALTH AND RESEARCH  SUBCOMMITTEE

Develops recommendations  to  the  Agency   and
especially  for  the   Offices  of  Research   and
Development, and Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic
Substances  for implementing  environment  justice
throughout the Agency's research activities  and on
relationships with other federal agencies involved in
monitoring the public's  health.  The subcommittee
accomplished the following list of activities.

•    Definition of Environmental Justice Research. The
     Subcommittee  began discussion of the  definition
     and carried it  over  to the following meeting at
     Dulles, VA, October 25, 1994.

•    The Subcommittee  discussed and endorsed the
     executive  summary on "Health  Research and
     Needs to Ensure Environmental Justice"  ensuing
     from the Health Research and Needs to Ensure
     Environmental Justice Symposium, and passed a
     motion to send the document to the interagency
     Working Group on Environmental Justice, all
     federal agencies and the PCSD.

•    The Subcommittee began discussion of the EPA
     Environmental Justice Strategy section on health
     and research.

•    Identification of major research areas important to
     environmental   justice  were  cumulative  risk,
     exposure, and pollution prevention.

•    The  Subcommittee  discussed  and  provided
     comments on  the EPA Office of Research and
     Development (ORD) draft Environmental Justice
     Research Strategy.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
       Discussion of the Interagency Working Group on
       Environmental Justice Task force on Research and
       Health meeting led to the following resolution to
       the NE JAC:  The NEJAC should be invited by the
       IWG to provide guidance on a meeting of federal
       agency science managers.

       The   Subcommittee  provided  comments  and
       suggestions for the following sections of the EPA
       EJ Strategic  Plan:  Health and Environmental
       Research; Data Collection, Analysis, and Access;
       and Integrate Environmental Justice.
A definition of environmental justice research was
proposed and accepted.

"Research that includes disproportionately affected
populations such as low-income and people of color
as co-partners in hypothesis testing and research
design to discover causes and consequences of
environmental disparities and develop, revise and
evaluate measures, criteria and participatory
methods to improve environmental regulation and
policy responses which protect human health and
eliminates environmental health disparities"
     community driven risk and impact assessments, as
     an  essential   component  of  wise  and  just
     environmental decisions.

     NEJAC  resolves that  there  is  a  need to
     coordinate research addressing environmental
     justice  across  agencies  of  the   federal
     government and support the Interagency
     Working Group on EJ (IWG) Committee on
     Research and Health in  its  call to hold a
     senior science  manager meeting using the
     model for stakeholder participation.

     NEJAC   resolves   that   the   NEJAC
     Subcommittee   on  Health  and Research
     engage the IWG Task Force on Research and
     Health  through  the HHS  Environmental
     Health  Policy  Committee,  instructing the
     DFOs and chairs to coordinate agendas.

     NEJAC   resolves   that   Dr.   Bullard,
     Chairperson of the Subcommittee on Health
     and Research,  and his designee from the
     subcommittee be included as formal peer
     reviewers  of  OPPE's  Cumulative  Risk
     Assessment document, entitled Cumulative
     Risk and Environmental Justice.
  The subcommittee reviewed various EPA policies and
  recommended the following actions be taken:

  •    change the way efforts under the Research Act are
       carried out
       change policy regarding the design of requests for
       proposals
  •    define community-driven research
  •    develop an assessment tool for cumulative risk
  •    develop research protocols that use an interagency
       model

  The Subcommittee recommended a coordinated effort
  with the advisory council of Health and Human Services
  (HHS) to consider environmental occupational health
  issues of migrant workers.

  The following resolutions were submitted to  the
  NEJAC for approval:

  •    NEJAC resolves that EPA should be applauded for
       speaking against the  use of risk  assessment and
       cost/benefit  analysis  as  the  sole criterion to
       evaluate the  merit of environmental  laws  and
       regulations.   However,  we also urge EPA to
       consider the well recognized and well-documented
       limitations of quantitative  risk assessment  and
       cost/benefit  analysis  as  decision making tools.
       Furthermore, we urge EPA to promote  the use of
•    NEJAC resolves that EPA reserve judgement
     on the recommendations of the HUD  Lead
     Report  "Controlling Lead  Hazards in the
     Nation's Housing" until issues raised by the
     minority  dissenting  opinion,  and  other
     reservations expressed by task force members
     are addressed and a response forwarded to
     the NEJAC.  We ask that the Administrator
     assign this function to the appropriate office
     or review board.

•    NEJAC   resolves   that   EPA,    in   its
     promulgation of the  final regulations on
     regulating munitions wastes fully consider its
     environmental justice impact, especially as it
     concerns health and safety issues.

INDIGENOUS PEOPLES SUBCOMMITTEE

Assists EPA in addressing grassroots environmental
concerns  of American Indians, Alaskan Natives,
Native Hawaiians and other indigenous groups which
may have problems resulting from remote location of
communities to  historical decisions resulting from
treaties.    The   subcommittee does  not  include
responsibility  for  government-to-government
operations which  is  the   jurisdiction of  EPA's
American Indian Environmental Office.
  Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
•    Request that OEJ,  in  conjunction with  AIEO,
     develop  guidance  describing the  relationship
     between  tribal  operations  and   environmental
     justice issues related to Native Americans with
     input  from EPA's Tribal Operations  Committee
     and the Indigenous Peoples Subcommittee

•    Draft  a paper on how EPA can assume permitting
     authority and  issue  site-specific  regulations  in
     Indian country under RCRA Subtitle  D for solid
     waste management facilities.

•    Draft  a paper on how EPA can assume permitting
     authority and  issue  site-specific  regulations  in
     Indian country under RCRA Subtitle  D for solid
     waste management facilities.

•    Recommends that EPA's budget for building the
     capacity  of Indian  Tribes  be  increased  and
     sustained until  all tribes  have available to them
     sufficient resources and expertise.

•    Request   that   NEJAC   recommend  to   the
     Administrator of EPA thatWard Valley, California
     should be declared a low-level radioactive  facility
     siting as an environmental justice issue and that a
     meeting be scheduled immediately between senior
     level federal officials from affected agencies (i.e.,
     DO I,  EPA, CEQ) and tribal representatives.

INTERNATIONAL SUBCOMMITTEE

Deals  with EPA's  environmental  policies  and
practices as they may have adverse impacts on  people
of color and low income communities along the U.S.
borders and in countries receiving shipments from
the   U.S.      Issues   may   include   export   of
toxic/hazardous  wastes,  testing or  storing   of
radioactive materials,  and  operations  of  multi-
national corporations in countries not recognized by
the OECD, usually  developing countries lacking in
environmental laws.

•    Bee ause this subcommittee is breaking new  ground
     in the area of environmental justice and because it
     is has only been in existence one year, it does not
     have a significant number of accomplishments to
     report.

•    Drafted several resolutions for consideration  by
     Administrator     Browner  concerning  public
     participation issues  related to the meeting of the
     Border Environmental Cooperation Commission
     and requested Administrator Browner to forward
     the NEJAC's concerns to Secretary Carabias of
     Mexico.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION &
ACCOUNTABILITY SUBCOMMITTEE

Provides recommendations to ensure that EPA holds
public meetings, produces materials that reflect the
public at large, and remains sensitive  to various
cultural  values  and community traditions in issue
policy documents and proposed rules of regulations.

The  NEJAC  Public Participation and Accountability
Subcommittee  is   composed  of  eight   members,
representing five different  stakeholder groups.  The
Subcommittee met  three times  in  1996  and  held
additional conference calls when an issue was necessary
for discussion. The purpose of the Subcommittee:

•    To improve the public participation process and
     accountability for all Federal agencies

•    To make recommendations forpublic participation
     and accountability  for all subcommittees of the
     NEJAC

•    To establish definitions of public participation and
     accountability that include access to information,
     education and community economic development

•    To  coordinate   with  indigenous,  tribal,  local
     international organizations, institutions, and other
     under-represented groups on public participation
     principles. These principles should reflect cultural
     values and community traditions
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
Accomplishments in 1996:

The Model Plan for Public Participation.  Members
of the subcommittee made revisions in the Model Plan,
including:

•    identifying types of stakeholders
•    enhancing the format of the document
•    enclosing   a   public   participation   checklist
     developed by the Interagency Working Group on
     Environmental Justice for use by federal and state
     agencies
•    enclosing  the  Core Values for the Practice of
     Public  Participation developed by  Interact: The
     Journal of Public Participation
•    preparing a cover letter from the Chairman of the
     NEJAC.

Based on the review of the Model Plan at a meeting of
the subcommittee in September 1996,  the members
approved  duplicating the final document.  Additional
accomplishments related to the Model Plan include:

•    Distributed the model plan to every member of the
     NEJAC, as well as otherparticipants  at the NEJAC
     meeting in December 1996

•    Placed a copy of the model plan on  the NEJAC's
     Home Page on the World Wide Web

•    Tested the effectiveness  of the model plan during
     the preparations for the Enforcement Roundtable
     meeting held in San Antonio, Texas in October
     1996 and the December meeting of the NEJAC

Improved NEJAC's interaction with communities.
Members  of the subcommittee took an active role in
improving NE JAC' s interaction in communities in which
meetings were held.  Specific accomplishments include:

•    Participated in the preparations for the bus tour
     conducted in Detroit, Michigan during the NEJAC
     meeting, as well as the bus tour itself

•    Participated  in preparations for the Enforcement
     Roundtable meeting held in San Antonio, Texas in
     October 1996

•    Met  with representatives  of  local community
     organizations in Baltimore, Maryland to  begin
     preparing  for the NEJAC meeting  in December
     1996

•    Recommended to NEJAC's Protocol Committee
     that:   (1) bus  tours  be scheduled mid-day to
     increase participation by members of the NEJAC
     and to provide the members with a better point of
     reference  and  understanding  for  the  public
     comment periods; (2) all members of the NEJAC
     should participate in the bus tours; and (3) public
     comment periods be scheduled at mid-day and in
     the  evening to make it more convenient for  the
     community members.

WASTE & FACILITY SITING
SUBCOMMITTEE

Provides  recommendations  to  the  Agency  and
especially  to  the  Office  of  Solid  Waste  and
Emergency Response on its environmental justice
policies,  strategies and activities as  they relate to
Superfund sites, as well as the siting and permitting
of waste disposal facilities, public health  issues and
urban revitalization and the cleanup  of Brownfields
sites.

Economic Redevelopment Working Group:

The working group began meeting again via conference
calls. The working group has invited the participation of
representatives from outside stakeholder groups  (e.g.,
Detroiters for Environmental Justice, Urban Habitat, and
the Keystone Center) in an effort to build comprehensive
stakeholder partnerships for  urban revitalization and
Brownfields.

The NEJAC Waste and Facility Siting Subcommittee's
report "Environmental Justice, Urban Revitalization, and
Brownfields:  The Search for Authentic Signs of Hope"
was  completed  following the May  1996  NEJAC
meeting.  The  report has been printed and distributed.
More than 400 copies of the full report were distributed
to participants atthe December 1996 NEJAC meeting or
mailed to individuals who requested copies.  The report
is also available electronically on the NEJAC homepage
and the OSWER Brownfields homepage.

Siting Working Group:

The working group reviewed the Draft siting guidance
entitled,  "Sensitive Environments and the Siting of
Hazardous Waste Management Facilities," developed by
EPA's Office  of  Solid  Waste  (OSW)  and  made
comments requesting revisions to the document. Those
comments were considered in the revised document. The
working group will be developing guiding principles of
environmental justice which should be considered with
respect to siting decisions.  These principles will be
incorporated into an addendum to the siting document to
be developed by OSW with recommendations from  the
Waste and Facility Siting Subcommittee.  The guidance
brochure, "Sensitive Environments and  the Siting of
Hazardous  Waste  Management Facilities," has  been
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
printed and will be available at the May 1997 NEJAC
meeting.

Community Access to LandView II:

The  Subcommittee  has  promoted the  idea  of broad
availability of the LandView II software and database to
EPA. LandView II continues to be available through
RTKNet.  The Subcommittee asked EPA to provide
complete  sets  of  LandView II to  each  NEJAC
subcommittee  chair to  enhance availability to  the
NEJAC and its member's constituents. As a result of the
Subcommittee's efforts  EPA has begun  to  provide
demonstrations of the system at many of the Agency's
public  meetings,   especially  those  related  to
environmental justice and brownfields redevelopment.
              Native American Issues:

              The Waste and Facility Siting Subcommittee and the
              Indigenous Subcommittee formed a working group to
              explore issues and opportunities for cooperative efforts.
              Because   of  the   resignation  of  the  Indigenous
              Subcommittee's Chair, these efforts have been delayed.
              The Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response has
              been working with the Subcommittee to develop a Tribal
              Issues Roundtable which will be held in the summer of
              1997.
Cooperative  Working  Interactions
Subcommittee Members and EPA:
between
Members of the Subcommittee have continued to work
cooperatively with EPA staff through  their various
stakeholder affiliations.  In addition to  working with
Headquarters  offices   on  siting,  relocation  and
brownfields issues, the members have been invited to
make formal and informal presentations at Regional and
Headquarters office and at public fora throughout the
country.    Several  Subcommittee  members  have
participated in EPA focus groups formed to gather input
into  the development  of a  Brownfields  National
Partnership  Action Agenda. The Subcommittee Chair
made a presentation to the federal Interagency Working
Group on Environmental Justice on the findings of the
Public   Dialogues  on  Brownfields  and  Urban
Revitalization.    The  subcommittee is  developing
recommendations  which  may be  included  in the
Brownfields National Partnership Action Agenda.
This concludes the activities accomplished by the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council. Many
of the events for which the NEJAC has recommended that the EPA Administrator take action have
successfully changed, modified or prevented public impacts which would have been detrimental to one or
more communities.  The receipt of public comments during each NEJAC meeting is the key to "open" and
honest consideration of many opinions which may or may not support current government decisions. The
fact that EPA is open to hearing these varying opinions makes it one of the unique federal agencies. It is
essential that the NEJAC continue to function in order to meet the  current efforts by the government to
provide forums for public access and comment.
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
                            APPENDIXII - ACRONYMS USED IN THIS REPORT
          ABA	American Bar Association
          ADEM	Alabama Department of Environmental Management
          ALA	American Lung Association
          APTMD	Air, Pesticides, and Toxics Management Division
          ATSDR	Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry

          CAA	Clean Air Act
          CAC	Community Advisory Committee
          CAFO  	Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations
          CBEP	Community-Based Environmental Program
          CBPH  	Committee for Boston Public Housing
          CBPO  	Community-Based Protection Office
          CBT	Community Building Teams
          CDCP  	Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
          CEQ	The White House Council on Environmental Quality
          CERCLA	Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
                         Liability Act
          CUP	Community/University Partnership

          DEC	Department of Environmental Conservation
          DEP	Department of Environmental Protection
          DOC	U.S. Department of Commerce
          DOD	U.S. Department of Defense
          DOE	U.S. Department of Energy
          DOH 	Department of Health (state level)
          DOI 	U.S. Department of Interior
          DOJ	U.S. Department of Justice
          DOL	U.S. Department of Labor
          DOS	Department of Sanitation (state level)
          DOT	U.S. Department of Transportation

          EAD	Environmental Accountability Division
          EAn	Environmental Analysis
          EIP	Eco-Industrial Park
          EIS	Environmental Impact Statement
          EIT	Environmental Implementation Team
          EJ	Environmental Justice
          EJC 	Environmental Justice Coordinator
          EJ/CL  	Environmental Justice/Community Liaison
          ENACT	Eastern Nebraskans Against Chemical Trespass
          EPA	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
          ETC	Escambia Treating Company
          EZ/EC	Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Communities

  _      FEMA	Federal Emergency Management Agency
  r      FFEO	Federal Facilities Enforcement Office
          FHWA	Federal Highway Administration
          FY  	Fiscal Year
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
        GAP	General Assistance Program
        GIS	Geographic Information System
        GLNPO	Great Lakes National Program Office
        GLO	Greater Leadership Opportunities Program
        GM	General Motors
        GPRA  	Government Performance and Results Act
        GRO  	Goal Setters's Reaching for Opportunities

-_-_-     HBCU  	Historically Black College and University
-U     HETF	Haudenosaunee Environmental Task Force
        HHS	U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
        HUD	U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
        HSI	Hispanic Serving Institution
 I
J
L
        ICMA  	International City/County Management Association
        IDEA	Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis
        IWG	Interagency Working Group on Environmental Justice

        JHU	Johns Hopkins University
        LDA	Louisiana Department of Agriculture
        LDEQ  	Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality
        LES  	Louisiana Energy Services
        LLRW	Low Level Radioactive Waste

        MDE  	Maryland Department of the Environment
        MOA	Memorandum Of Agreement
        MOU	Memorandum of Understanding
        MVEC	Merrimack Valley Environmental Coalition

        NAAQS	Non-Attainment Air Quality Standards
        NASA	National Aeronautics and Space Administration
        NCCC  	National Civilian Community Corps
        NCHS  	National Center for Health Statistics
        NDEQ  	Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality
        NEJAC  	National Environmental Justice Advisory Council
        NEPA	National Environmental Policy Act
        NETI	National Enforcement Training Institute
        NGO  	Non-Government Organization
        NHANES	National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
        NPDES  	National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
        NPL	National Priorities List
        NRC	Nuclear Regulatory Commission
        NYCDEP	New York City Department of Environmental ProtectionOAQPS

_      OAQPS	Office of Air Quality and Planning Standards
O      OAR	Office of Air and Radiation
        OARM	Office of Administration and Resource Management
        OAS	Open Airways for Schools
        OCEPA	Office of Communications, Education, and Public Affairs
                       Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
          OCR	Office of Civil Rights
          OECA	Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
          OEJ	Office of Environmental Justice
          OFA	Office of Federal Activities
          OGC  	Office of General Counsel
          OIA 	Office of International Activities
          OIRM 	Office of Information Resources Management
          OMB	Office of Management and Budget
          OPM  	Office of Policy and Management
          OPPE	Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation
          OPPTS	Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances
          ORD	Office of Research and Development
          ORE	Office of Regulatory Enforcement
          ORE-MIED	Office of Regulatory Enforcement-Multimedia
                          Enforcement Division
          ORE-RED	Office of Regulatory Enforcement-RCRA Enforcement Division
          ORE-TPED	Office of Regulatory Enforcement-Toxics and Pesticides
                          Enforcement Division
          ORIA	Office of Radiation and Indoor Air
          OSDBU	Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization
          OSHA 	Occupational Safety and Health Administration
          OSTP	Office of Science and Technical Policy
          OSWER	Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
          OW 	Office of Water

  _      PCB	Polychlorinated Biphenyls
  -T      PECT	Population Estimation and Characterization Tool
          PETE	Partnership  for Environmental Technology Education
          ppm	parts per million
          PPW	Partners for Pure Water
          PRASA 	Puerto Rico  Aqueduct and Sewer Authority
          PRDA 	Puerto Rico  Department of Agriculture
          PRDNR	Puerto Rico  Department of Natural Resources
          PRDOH	Puerto Rico  Department of Health
          PREPA	Puerto Rico  Electric Power Authority
          PRIME 	Philadelphia Regional Introduction of Minorities to Engineering
          PSD 	Passive Sampling Devices
          PWS	Public Water Supply

  _      RA	Regional Administrator
  IV     RAB	Restoration Advisory Board
          RCRA	Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
          RCRIS	Resource Conservation Recovery Information System
          REJWG	Region Environmental Justice Work Group
          ROAR	Rat-on-a-Rat
          RRIIFS	Remedial Removal and Integrated Investigation Feasibility Study
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
        SEIS	Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
        SEP  	Supplemental Environmental Project
        SLT  	South Lawrence Trafficway
        STAC  	Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee
        STEP	Service Training for Environmental Progress
„      TCI  	Tribal College Initiative
 1      TFS  	Tropical Fruit Site
        TIF	Tax Incremental Financing
        TIGER	Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Reference
        System
        TNRCC	Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
        TOC	Tribal Operations Committee
        TRI  	Toxic Release Inventory
        TSCA	Toxic Substances Control Act
        TWDB	Texas Water Development Board

        UEI  	Urban Environmental Initiative
        UM	University of Maryland
        USDA	U.S. Department of Agriculture
        UST	Underground Storage Tank

_ 7      VOC	Volatile Organic Compound
„,     WELP	Women's Executive Leadership Program
W     WIPP	Waste Isolation Pilot Plan
        WPS	Worker Protection Standard
                        Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
                                                              APPENDIX III
                     TIME LINE OF MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL  JUSTICE EVENTS
                                                                        Iof3
CEQ's annual report
acknowledges racial
discrimination adversely
affects urban poor and the
quality of their environment
Farm Worker Protection
Standards reopened
GAO Report states that
3 of 4 hazardous waste
facilities in EPA's Region 4
(Southeast) are in African
American communities
            1971
        1981
                         Robert Bullard's study of
                         an affluent African American
                         Community's attempt to block
                         the siting of a sanitary
                         landfill is published
        1983
                         Warren County, North
                         Carolina, NAACP demonstration
                         and lawsuit against PCB landfill
                         EPA issues Indian Policy.
EPA, DOJ, DOD & Olin
Chemical settle Triana,
Alabama case which had
EJ provisions
                                 1986
United Church of Christ
issues report entitled Toxic
Wastes and Race in the
United States
                            September 1987
Michigan Coalition
Conference releases report
Rate and the Incidence of
Environmental Hazards
                                  1990
    November 1984
                         Congressional Hearings on
                         radioactive contamination
                         of Pacific Islanders
     April 1987
                         Mattie Blue Legs case
                         outlined EPA compliance
                         role in Tribal lands
        1990
                         Bullard publishes Dumping
                         in Dixie which is used as
                         the first textbook on EJ
EPA Administrator
establishes the Environ-
mental Equity Workgroup
after grassroots groups
wrote to EPA
                            October 1991
First of four meetings on
Environmental Justice held
between grassroots leaders
and EPA Administrator
                              June 1992
National Law Journal report,
Unequal Environmental
Protection alleged that EPA
discriminated in taking
enforcement actions
                           November 1992
         1990
        1991
                         First National People
                         of Color Leadership Summit
                         adopts the Principles of
                         Environmental Justice
                         EPA releases the report
                         Environmental Equity:
                         Reducing Risk for All
                         Communities
    September 1992
                         EPA issues Farmworker
                         Protection Regulations
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
                                                                APPENDIX III
                       TIME LINE OF MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE EVENTS
                                                                         2 of 3
                         Imperial County, Calif
                         Petition focuses attention
                         on environmental issues of
                         Hispanics along U.S.-
                         Mexico Border
     February 1992
   September 1993
                         Interagency Symposium on
                         Health Research and Needs
                         To Ensure Environmental
                         Justice is held in Arlington,
                         Virginia
     February 1994
                                 Interagency Working
                                 Group on Environ-
                                 Interagency Working
                                 Group on EJ is
                                 established
EPA Administrator makes
environmental justice an
Agency priority
                            February 1993
                             February 1994
University of Massachusetts
issues a study which
challenges siting demographics
EPA establishes the
National Environmental
Justice Advisory Council
First Interagency Public
Meeting on Environmental
Justice held at Clark
Atlanta University,
Atlanta, Georgia
Clinton issues Executive
Order 12898 designating that
11 federal agencies are
accountable for EJ and
calling for implementation
plans

Report to The President which
shows Interagency Projects on
EJ underway as required by
E.O.12898
                                  1994
                              April 1995
                                       May 1994
                                          1995
           1994
     January 1995
                         United Church of Christ
                         Issues Toxic Waste and
                         Race Revisited which
                         strengthens the association
                         between race and siting of
                         waste facilities
                         The Environmental Justice
                         Strategies from 11 agencies
                         as required in E.O. 12898
                         are issued to The President
      April 1995
GAO publishes report
Hazardous and Non-
Hazardous Waste: Demo-
graphics of People Living
Near Waste Facilities-finds
discrimination studies in-
conclusive
                                  1995
National Academy of
Science's Institute of
Medicine initiates an
EJ Study: Research,
Education and Health
Policy Needs
EJ Implementation Reports
From 11 agencies of
Interagency Working
Group Due as required
By E.O. 12898
                                 1996
                                 CDC, EPA and NIEHS
                                 launch the Mississippi
                                 Delta Project to
                                 examine health
                                 problems along the
                                 industrial corridor
                                          1996
            1995
        1995
                          CMA and NAM publish
                         a business guide to
                         environmental justice issues
                         EPA expands RCRA Public
                         Participation Rule to empower
                         communities to become involved
                         in the RCRA permitting process
       April 1996
                                 CEQ issues for public
                                 Comment the Draft
                                 Guidance on incorpor-
                                 ating EJ into NEPA
                                 requirements
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------
                                                               APPENDIX III
                      TIME LINE OF MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL  JUSTICE EVENTS
                                                                        3 of 3
EPA announces decision to
relocate 358 minority, low
income households living
next to Escambia Wood Treat-
ment Plant, Pensacola, Florida
                National Council of State
                Legislatures publishes a
                State Guide on EJ and
                applicable state
                legislation
The President issues
E.O. 13045 Protecting
Children from Environ-
mental Health and
Safety Risks
                               May 1996
                                                 1996
                              May 1997
           1996
                         1996
                         The President issues E.O.
                         13007 on Indian Sacred
                         Sites to protect current
                         and historical Indian
                         religious sites
Michigan District Court
rules in NAACP vs MDNR
(Genesee) that the state must
consider cumulative risk and
enhance public participation
before issuing major permits
                                         Chester, PA, residents
                                         file a CRA Title 6
                                         complaint in District Court
                                         against the State of PA
                                         for siting a disproportionate
                                         number of waste facilities in
                                         their community
     April 1997
                        NRC's Licensing Board rules
                        in LES license application that
                        NRC did not adequately investi-
                        gate the EJ issues pursuant to
                        E.O.12898
        June 1996
      July 1997
         T
State of Kansas vs Haskell
Indian Nations University
re a highway through sacred
grounds. Federal District Court
ruled that a project cannot be
de-federalized to avoid NEPA
EJ analysis
Environmental Justice: Working Toward Solutions - August 1997

-------