-SL-
'' "-  • - •-.- l> '•  i, •-'. .:'(/' A  •'•'•• i -<

\ ' ' "  '•-"'"•i "A.''":1 '-T^ --
 i-^	 '  )„']-., ',^j >  -V ' -.'••  ' •;•<{

 ' '"'" ) .-'  • '  'f' "i-1 ^: •  >.' • .1:.;V
  t J • • J •"  1    •  ' - '
  .' ' .,  "i" !(.'•!.   : '  •. .%.r -'. .
    '•'•:*,"-'-   ^f,^ s •:'."_ :_', '•$
Region 6
                    ^>y^iiivv; :-;= i^-.-'.. •
                      SiiperttiHd
                               SUj*IMAMIiES
                       Super!und Progress

-------

-------
                                To Our Readers...
      The Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, has made every effort to ensure the
accuracy and timeliness of these Superfund Site Status Summaries. However, if you feel that
we have made an error or you have information that you feel would be beneficial to
improving these public information documents, we want to hear from you! Please contact us
at 1-800-533-3508 (toll free) with your comments and suggestions.
                                   Thank You!

-------

-------
AGRICULTURE
STREET LANDFILl
LOUISIANA
EPA ID# LAD98105699
                                    EPA REGION  6
                               CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
                                            02
                                       Orleans Parish
                                        New Orleans
Site Description
Location:
Population:
• The site is located in New Orleans, Orleans Parish, Louisiana. It is
approximately three miles south of Lake Pontchartrain and 2.5 to 3.0 miles
north-northeast of the Vieux Carre and the Central Business District. The
approximate geographic coordinates for the center of the site are 29°59'20"
north latitude and 90°02'31" west longitude. The site is bounded on the
north by Higgins Road and on the east from Clouet Street (to the south)
to Montegut Street (to the north).  On the south and west, the site runs
along the Southern Railroad right-of-way.  The Peoples Avenue and
Florida Avenue canals are located west and south of the site, respectively.

• The 1990 Census identifies 374 residential units (some 1,000 people) on
site. The community is predominately African American.
Setting:
• A 100 acre former City disposal area that has been partially
redeveloped. 47 acres of the site has private and public housing, the Press
Park Community Center, a recreation center, retail businesses, and the
Moton Elementary school. The remainder of the site is undeveloped and
covered by dense vegetation.
 Hydrology:
•  The Peoples Avenue canal is to the west and the Florida Avenue canal
is to the south. Both receive storm water runoff from the site. Canal
water is pumped into Industrial Canal which then discharges into Lake
Pontchartrain. A shallow aquifer (that is not a drinking water source)
that underlies the site is encountered between 2 and 9 feet below land
surface.
                                                                November 29, 1995

-------
Wastes and Volumes
•     When in operation, the disposal area accepted municipal garbage, construction debris,
      incinerator and open burning ash. This type of material ranges in depth from 2 to more
      than 32.5 feet beneath the 100 acre site.
Site Assessment and Ranking
                            NPL LISTING HISTORY
                               Site HRS Score: 50,00^
                               Proposed Date: 8/23/94
                                Final Date: 12/16/94
                                NPL Update: No. 13
Site Map and Diagram
The Remediation Process  	

SH* History.

•     1910 to 1957- used as a municipal landfill

•     1958- The incinerator on site was decommissioned.
November 28, 1995
AGRICULTURE STREET LANDFILL

-------
                                       •*         *$!••  :»
•      1965- Landfill reopened to receive debris created by Hurricane Betsy; open burning of
       waste continued for 6 to 7 months, after which the area was covered with ash from city
       incinerators and compacted with bulldozers.

•      1977 to 1986- the northern portion of site was re-developed to support housing (390
       properties are on the site of the old landfill), small businesses, and the Moton Elementary
       school. The residential properties received a relatively thin (often 6 inches or less)
       covering of soil; the Moton School was built upon several feet of clean fill.

•      1986- EPA completed a site investigation. Under the 'old' HRS ranking system (which
       excluded ingestion) the site did not qualify for placement on the National Priorities  List
       (NPL).

•      1993- On May 4 community leaders from the Moton Elementary  school area filed a
       complaint with the Gulf Coast Tenants Organization and requested EPA to re-evaluate
       the site.  In September EPA collected additional samples for use in the revised HRS
       model (that reflects ingestion).

•      1994- EPA initiated an accelerated investigation integrated with Removal Actions.
       Fieldwork was completed in May 1994 including the erection of a fence around the
       undeveloped area  and removal of highly contaminated soils at a children's  play area. The
       site was proposed  to the NPL August 23, 1994. Due to community concerns created by
       the Superfund listing, the school board announced on  August 24, the Moton would not
       open and that students would be bussed  to a different school. The site was formally
       added to the NPL on December 16,1994.

Health Considerations:

•      MOTQN SCHOOL: No health or environmental problems detected; the school built on top
       of 3 to 5 feet of clean fill.

•      SHALLOW GROUND WATER:  found to be contaminated with elevated levels of metals.
       However, this aquifer is not useable by humans and was not found affect surface water.

•      RESIDENTIAL AREAS -  SOILS:

         *    Current Surface Contamination - Marginal human health risk:

                    1.3  X IP"4 lifetime cancer  risk (all contaminants of concern);

                    6.1% children with projected risk  (Pb concentrations 500 to 1,000 ppm).

         *    Future Surface Contamination - If landfill materials below the top foot of soils were
             exposed due to human activity, health risks would increase to:

                    5.0  X IP"4 lifetime cancer  risk (all contaminants of concern);

                    63.8% children with projected risk (Pb  concentrations 1,000  to 4,000 ppm).
AGRICULTURE STREET LANDFILL
November 28,  1995

-------
      UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY SOILS;

        *    Current Surface Contamination - Currently contamination levels are high (e.g. 1,000
             to 4,000 ppm lead, but there is no routine exposure of people.

        *    Future Surface Contamination - City has zoned tracts "residential."
Other Environmental Risks:

•     The site is an urban setting; there are minimal ecological impacts.

Record of  Decision	
                                         Signed:

                                         Pending
Community Involvement
      Community Involvement Plan: Developed 03/94
      Open houses and workshops: 8/93, 9/93, 2/94, 6/94, 9/94, 10/94, 11/94, 1/95, 7/95
      Original Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting:
      Original ROD Fact Sheet:
      Milestone Fact Sheets: 8/93, 9/93,12/93, 2/94, 3/94, 5/94,10/94, 11/94, 12/94, 7/95
      Citizens on site mailing list: 458
      Site Repositories:
             (1) Helen Edwards Elementary School Library 504/942-3625
             (2) Community Outreach Office  504/944-6445
Technical Assistance Grant
•      Availability Notice: 6/94; re-advertised 7/94
•      Letters of Intent Received:
             1) Concerned Citizens of Agriculture St. Landfill (CCASL)
             2) Citizens For An Environmentally Safe Press Park
•      Final Application Received:  9/20/94
•      Grant Award: 09/27/94
 Fiscal and Program Management
 • Remedial Project Manager: Ursula Lennox (EPA) 214-665-6743, Mail Code: 6SF-LL
 • On-scene Coordinator: Craig Carroll (EPA) 214-665-2299, Mail Code: 6SF-R1
 • State Contact: Bill Perry
 • Community Involvement Coordinator: Olivia Balandran (EPA) 214-665-6584, Mail Code: 6SF-P
 • Attorney: John Dugdale (EPA) 214-665-8027, Mail Code:  6SF-DL
 • State Coordinator:  Marilyn Owen (EPA) 214-665-8508, Mail Code:  6SF-LL
 • Prime Contractor:  Ecology and Environment
 November 28, 1995
                                                          AGRICULTURE STREET LANDFILL

-------
Present Status and Issues
•     EPA completed Feasibility Studies and plans to propose final remedies for all 5 operable
      units of the site in December 1995.
Cleanup Measurements
      The Agriculture Street Landfil site is one of Region 6's highest priority environmental justice
      sites. An integrated and accelerated response action will allow final remedies to be decided
      and parts of the site to be removed from the NPL in 2 years  (compared to more than 12
      years as a previous national average at other similar Superfund sites).
 AGRICULTURE STREET LANDFILL
November 28, 1995

-------

-------
AMERICAN
CREOSOTE WOR
INC.  (WINNFIELD
PLANT)
LOUISIANA
EPA ID# LAD000239814
 EPA REGION 6
GRESSIONAL DISTRICT 06
      Winn Parish
      Winnfield
Site Description
Location:    • Winnfield, Winn Parish, Louisiana
           • Site covers approximately 34 acres at 1006 Front Street
           • Primarily residential area

Population:   • Winnfield, LA (Population 7,000)
           • An estimated 5,700 people live within a mile of the site.

Setting:     • Residential on 3 sides, industrial on 1 side

Hydrology:   • Alluvial deposits
           • Two aquifers within upper 60 feet
Wastes and Volumes
1.     Principle Pollutants:
      • Pentachlorophenol in concentrations up to 6,000 parts per million
      • Carcinogenic Hydrocarbons (CPAH's) in concentrations up to 506,000 parts per billion

2.     Volume:
      • 25,000 cubic yards of "TAR" mat deposits
      • 275,000 cubic yards contaminated soils
      • 1 million gallons subsurface creosote product
      • 24 million gallons contaminated groundwater
Site Assessment and Ranking
                          NPL LISTING HlSTOftY
                             Site HRS Score: 50.70
                             Proposed Date; 2/&7/QZ
                             Final Date: 10/14^2
                             NPL Update: No, 12
                                                          November 28, 1995

-------
Site Map and  Diagram
                                                   FORMER
                                                   PROCESS
                                                   AREA
                                                                American
                                                               Creosoting
The Remediation Process  	

Site History:

•      Site operated as a wood treater from the turn of the century through the 1980s.
•      Site has had numerous owners, the first of which was the Bodeau Lumber Co., which
       began operations in 1901. Louisiana Creosoting Co. acquired 22 acres of the property in
       1922 and then resold the parcel of land to American Creosote Works of Louisiana, Inc.
       in 1938.
•      In 1950, the entire property, along with 12 additional acres, was sold to American
       Creosote, which was later bought out by Dickson Lumber Co. in 1977. The property was
       seized by the city for taxes after Dickson declared bankruptcy. Wood treatment
       operations were taken over by Stallworth Timber in 1980 which then abandoned the site
       in 1985.
•      Sources of contamination at the site include: five unlined pits used for the disposal of
       wastes generated by the wood-treating process, storage areas containing creosote and
       treated and untreated wood, and the plant at which the wood-treating operations took
       place. Contamination also was caused  by on-site drainage ditches which received surface
       water run-off from the facility.
•      April - May 1988, EPA Emergency Response Branch conducted emergency removal to
       prevent  oils and sludges from seeping out of storage tanks and flowing to a nearby creek:
       contaminants were pumped from pits, treated and contained on site.
November 28, 1995
AMERICAN CREOSOTE WORKS, INC.
             (WINNFIELD PLANT)

-------
•      June - September 1988, the Potentially Responsible Party (PRP), under an EPA
       Administrative Order, fenced the site.
•      Site wastes still seeping subsurface into the bayou and soil surface wastes present a direct
       contact threat.

Health Considerations:

•      Direct contact with site risks and potential for drinking water contamination.

Other Environmental Risks:

•      Site wastes leading into adjacent bayou and potentially impacting biota.
Record  of Decision
                                     Signed; April 28,1993
Selected Remedy:
       •     Onslte Incineration of 25,000 cubic yards tar mat
       •     In-sttu blotreatment of 275,000 cubic yards of contaminated soils.
       •     Pump and treat liquid contaminants.
 Other Remedies Considered
  Reason Not Chosen
1. Total Incineration

2. Cap

3. Solidification
Community  Involvement
Not cost effective

No treatment (statutory preference)

Failed In treatabllKy studies
       Community Involvement Plan: Developed
       Open houses and workshops: 2/92, 4/92, 7/92, 5/93, 9/93,4/94, 7/94
       Original Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting:  8/3/92, 9/8/92
       Final Proposed Plan Fact Sheet: 03/01/93
       Original ROD Fact Sheet:  5/93
       Milestone Fact Sheets:   Remedial Design 9/93
       Citizens on site mailing list: 232
       Site Repository: Winn Parish Public Library, Winnfield.
AMERICAN CREOSOTE WORKS, INC.
(WINNFIELD PLANT)
                         November 28, 1995

-------
Technical Assistance Grant
       Availability Notice: 10/92
       Letters of Intent Received:  (1) 10/92 - Winnfield AC TAG, Inc. (2)2/93  - Greater Winn
                                Parish Development Corporation
       Application Received:  5/4/95 Concerned Environmentalists of Winn
       Grant Award: Pending
Fiscal and Program Management
• Remedial Project Manager:  Warren Arthur (EPA) 214-665-8504, Mail Code: 6SF-LL
• State Contact: Duane Wilson, LDEQ
• Community Involvement Coordinator: Melanie Lillard (EPA) (214) 665-2294, Mail Code 6SF-
P
• Attorney: John Dugdale (EPA) 214-665-8027, Mail Code:  6SF-DL
• State Coordinator: Marilyn Owen (EPA) 2140665-8508, Mail Code: 6SF-LL
• Prime Contractor:  FT/DAVY (A Joint Venture)
Present Status and Issues
      RA contract signed June 1994
      Pre-construction conference conducted September 1994
      Corps of Engineers resident office established in Winnfield December 1994
      Construction design review initiated January 1995
      On site mobilization of incinerator is planned for early 1996.

Cleanup Measurements	
      This site continues to contaminate Creosote Branch and is unusable as commercial or
      residential property. The town of Winnfield is economically depressed. It was one of the
      early Administrative Improvement initiatives (a "Lightening ROD" site) that combines
      speed with community involvement.  Compared to a national average of 8 years, Region 6
      required little more than 2 years to progress from proposed addition to the NPL to start
      of final Remedial Action. In developing the bid specifications, EPA involved local
      government and Chambers of Commerce.  EPA's remedial action will therefore boost
      local employment during cleanup, return the property to usable conditions and eliminate
      the sources of contamination.
November 28,1995
AMERICAN CREOSOTE WORKS, INC.
             (WINNFIELD PLANT)

-------
BAYOU BON
LOUISIANA
EPA ID# LAD980745632
                                      EPA REGION 6
                                   iNGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 01
                                        St Tammany Parish
                                           Near Slidell
Site Description
Location:
Population:

Setting:
Hydrology:
The site is at the location of the former American Creosote Works Plant
within St Tammany Parish, Slidell, Louisiana.
The site is south of West Hall Avenue in Slidell and north of and adjacent
to Bayou Bonfouca.

Approximately 26,000 residents live in the surrounding community.

Nearest residence potentially impacted by the site is approximately 400
feet from the site, across the bayou to the southwest.
Nearest drinking water well is approximately 1/4 mile northeast of the site.
The site was used for commercial operations involving the treatment of
wood products with creosote.
The site encompasses approximately 52 acres.
There are eight highly contaminated creosote areas  at the site.
The northern half of the site is heavily wooded.
The site is bordered on the east by a drainage ditch, on the west by a
creek, and on the south by Bayou Bonfouca.
The contaminants have been found in the bayou.

Seven stratigraphic layers were encountered in the first 60 feet during the
Remedial Investigation of the site.
Three ground water systems were encountered at the site, including a
surficial aquifer, a shallow artesian aquifer at 30 feet, and a deep artesian
aquifer at 60+ feet.
The elevation of the 100-year floodplain is 9 feet (MSL). Most of the site
would be inundated by a flood of this elevation.
Wastes and Volumes
       The principle pollutants at the Bayou Bonfouca Superfund site include Polynuclear
       Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PNAs) - Creosote Compounds.
                                                                     November 28, 1995

-------
Site Assessment and Ranking
                             NFL USTING HISTORY
                                 Site HRS Score: £&78_ ,, ,
                                ProposfiKl'Dste; 12/30/33
                               - ,  Final Date: 9/GSC83
                                 NPL Update: Original
Site Map and  Diagram
                     Extent of Ground "Water and Sediment Contamination

                                West Hall Ave.
                                                 Bayou
                                               Bonfouca
                                                          1
                                               Legend
                                             Ground Wafer Contamination
                                             SKlmant Contwnlnatfan
                                               NOT TO SCALE	
The Remediation Process 	:	

Silo History:

•  A creosote plant began operating at the site around the turn of the century.
•  Over the years, the plant operated under several owners, including Gulf States Creosoting,
American Creosote, and American Creosote Works, with property ownership resting finally with
the Braselman Corporation.
•  Numerous releases of creosote occurred during the years of operation.
*  In 1970, the American Creosote Works plant burned down and it is thought that a large
amount of creosote may have spilled from storage tanks and flowed across the site and into the
bayou.
November 28, 1995
BAYOU BONFOUCA

-------
•  July - August 1985, the Potentially Responsible Party (PRP), under an EPA Administrative
Order, fenced the site.

Health Considerations:

•  From ingestion of contaminated ground water from the shallow artesian aquifer, (currently
not used as a drinking water source);
•  From exposure to contaminated on-site soils;
•  From exposure to contaminated sediments in the western creek; the eastern channel; and the
bayou; and,
•  From ingestion of fish and shellfish from the bayou.
Record of Decision
                                    Signed;  March 31,1987
                      Incorporated the Source Control ROD of August 15,1985
• The Bayou Bonfouca Superfund site remedy for the overall site remedy includes:

       o      On-site incineration
       o      Ground water treatment
       o      Bayou dredging
 Other. Remedies Considered

1.  On-site Landfill
2.  Offstte Landfill
3.  Biological Treatment
4.  No Action
         Reason Not Chosen
Bayou sediments would not be treated
Least preferred under SARA
Feasibility concerns
Would not adequately protect human health and the
environment
Community  involvement	

• Community Involvement Plan:  Developed 04/84, revised 08/85
• Open houses and workshops: 04/85, 06/86, 9/6/89, 7/12/90, 12/5/90, 6/26/91, 11/11/92, 12/8/93,
1/13/93, 3/3/93, 5/19/93, 7/21/93, 9/93,11/93, 4/94, 6/94, 8/94,12/94, 2/95
• Original Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting: 02/87
• Original ROD Fact Sheet: 07/87; BSD:  1/90
• Milestone Fact Sheets: Update 03/88,08/89,06/90,12/90 BSD decision 1/90,1/93, 9/93,11/93,
2/94, 5/94, 7/94, 9/95
• Citizens on site mailing list: 318
• Constituency Interest: High interest at site.  Nearby residents strongly oppose on-site landfill.
• Site Repository: St. Tammany Parish Library, Slidell Branch, Slidell, Louisiana
• Commemorative Activities: 6/91 - Ground Water Treatment Plant Completion; 9/95 - Source
Control Construction Completion
 BAYOU BONFOUCA
                                November 28, 1995

-------
Technical Assistance Grant
• Availability Notice: 02/89, 5/94, 6/94
• Letters of Intent Received:       Slidell Working Against Major Pollution (SWAMP), 5/94;
                                Earth Beautiful Foundation, 6/94
• Final Application Received: 11/94
• Grant Award:  12/94 (To SWAMP)

Fiscal and Program Management	
• Remedial Project Manager:  Mark Hansen (EPA) 214-665-7548, Mail Code: 6SF-LL
• State Contact:  Duane Wilson, LDEQ
• Community Involvement Coordinator: Melanie Lillard (EPA) 214-665-2294, Mail Code: 6SF-
P
• Attorney: John Dugdale (EPA) 214-665-8027, Mail Code:  6SF-DL
• State Coordinator: Marilyn Owen (EPA) 214-665-8508, Mail Code: 6SF-LL
• Prime Contractor:  CH2MHiIl

Cost Recovery:
• PRPs Identified: 3
• Viable PRP: 2

Present Status and Issues  	
      Ground water pumping and treatment began in June 1991 and has reduced the volume of
      contamination and prevented further migration.
      As of May 1994, 5,006,845 gallons of contaminated ground water has been treated and
      14,420 gallons of pure creosote oils recovered.
      Incineration operations began in November 1993, when trial bum activities were
      conducted.  Incineration was completed on July 28,1995 18 months ahead of schedule.
      Early noise issues were addressed by the installation of an "in-stack". silencer.
      Demobilization of incinerator  to begin in 1996 after completion of Southern Shipbuilding
      waste treatment.
Cleanup  Measurements
      Creosote in the Bayou was so concentrated that it caused 2nd degree chemical burns to
      divers; the Bayou was biologically sterile.  EPA's remedial action has detoxified over
      170,000 cubic yards of contaminated sediment, and treated 10 million gallons of
      contaminated ground water.  A mile and a half of the Bayou has been restored for
      aquatic life, as well as human recreational and residential use. The City of Slidell is
      interested in utilizing the 52 acre site as a community center, park, and flood control
      facility.
November 28, 1995
BAYOU BONFOUCA

-------
BAYOU SO
LOUISIANA
EPA ID# LAD980745541
                                      EPA REGION 6
                                 QNGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 04
                                          Iberville Parish

                                          Other Names:
                                     Environmental Purification
                                          Advancement
                                    Halliburton Services (CLAW)
                                    Grand River Pits (local name)
Site Description

Location:           •
Population:


Setting:
Hydrology:
• 20 miles SW of Baton Rouge, six miles north of the Town of Bayou
Sorrel.
• Iberville Parish, Louisiana

• Less than 100 year round residents within 5 miles of site.
• 33,000 in Iberville Parish

• Remote backswamp environment.
• Three permanent residences within two miles.
• Nearest drinking water well is 1/2 mile; wells used for washing/bathing,
not drinking.
• Total site = 265 acres.
• Three landfill areas, four closed-out ponds, one landfarm area.
• Total waste disposal areas = 40-50 acres.

« 75-125 feet of clays & silts beneath site.
• Below days - sand, gravels & silts possibly to 700 ft. below land surface.
• This sand, silt and gravel layer is the Plaquemine aquifer.
• Ground water withdrawal from the Plaquemine aquifer is minimal, due
to low population density and poor ground water quality.
Wastes and Volumes  	

Primary Contaminants:

• Process wastes from pesticide/herbicide manufacturing.
• Sulfide-containing wastes from hydrocarbon processing and exploration.
• Spent wash from boiler and process-equipment cleaning.

Volume:

• Approximately 1,000,000 cubic feet of contaminated soil/ wastes
                                                                    November 29, 1995

-------
Site Assessment and Ranking
                            NPL LISTING HISTQBY
                                Site HRSScora 34.63
                               Proposed Oatet 1^/30/82
                                 Final Date: 9/08/8$
                                NPt Update:  Original"
• The PRP challenged the ranking package with respect to the air score using an observed air
release from four years prior. This release resulted in one death.  No changes were made to the
package.

Site Map and Diagram  	
                     I CAPPED AREAS

               Bayou Sorrel Site
                                Bayou
                                 Sorrel
                                  Site
The Remediation Process 	

Site History:

• 1977-1978 received wastes from Petrochemical Industries in LA, TX, AR, and MS.
• 1978-1979 closure overseen by State after death of a truck driver.
• Operated by EPA, Inc., sister Company of CLAW, Inc. (Injection well)
November 29, 1995
BAYOU SORREL SITE

-------
Health Considerations:

• Direct Contact:  Exposure to contaminated soil/sediment
• Ground Water  Ingestion of contaminated'source
• Surface Water  Ingestion of contaminated source

Other Environmental Risks:

• Same risks as above with respect to aquatic organisms and onsite game animals.
Record of Decision
                                 Sfgned:  November 14,1986

• The selected remedy for the site includes installation of multi-layer caps, slurry walls, and gas
venting systems.
• Extensive O&M Plan with ground water monitoring.
                Other Remedies Considered and Reason Not Chosen
1. On-site incineration
2. Offeite RCRA landfill
3. No Action
4. Clay cap (without geomembrane)
Takes 10-30 years, >$200M
Not cost effective
Not protective
Poor long-term effectiveness
Community Involvement
• Community Involvement Plan:  Developed 06/84, revised 07/90.
• Open houses and workshops:
• Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting:  01/86.
• ROD Fact Sheet:
• Milestone Fact Sheets:  Updates 7/88, 3/89, 3/90, Open House 9/90, Reconnaissance visit to
prepare for Ribbon cutting 9/91.
• Citizens on site mailing list: 56
• Constituency Interest: Citizens/residents not opposed to EPA's selected remedy.
• Site Repository: Iberville Parish Library
Technical Assistance Grant
• Availability Notice: 02/13/89
• Letters of Intent Received:  None
• Grant Award: N/A
BAYOU SORREL SITE
                               November 29, 1995

-------
Fiscal and Program Management
• Ramedlml Project Manager (EPA): John L. Mo, 214/665-8409, Mail Sta. 6SF-LL
• State Contact: Rich Johnson
• Community Involvement Coord. (EPA): Melanie Ontiveros Lillard, 214/665-2294, Mail Sta.
6SF-P
• Attorney (EPA):  Keith A. Smith, 214/665-2157, Mail Sta. 6SF-DL
• State Coordinator (EPA):  Marilyn Owen, 214/665-8508, Mail Sta. 6SF-LL
• Prime Contractor: ERM Southwest, Ino/PRP contractor

Cost Recovery: PRP Lead (Enforcement)

• PRPs Identified: 95
• Viable PRP:  35
• Enforcement Options:

       • Consent Decree signed with settling PRPs for RD/RA in December 1987 for $800,000
       for response costs prior to 6/15/87 and up to $1,885,000 for future oversight costs.
       • 1989 Consent Decree with BFI for $185,000 completed.
       • Referral  issued for cost recovery from Cyril Hinds, recalcitrant former owner/operator,
       in 1992.
Present Status and  Issues
• Site is in long-term Operation & Maintenance, with all remedial activities completed. The first
5-Year Review (necessary because wastes remain onsite) was completed in September 1993.
• Present ground water monitoring data indicates cap and slurry wall performing as designed.
• EPA has recovered all past costs with the exception of approximately $150,000 which is
presently being pursued from the recalcitrant former owner/operator, Cyril Hinds.
• This site is expected to be deleted from the NPL in 1996.

Cleanup Measurements   	
• Over 1 million cubic feet of waste has been contained in a slurry wall, multilayered clay cap
system.
• The remedy includes extensive monitoring to ensure protectiveness is maintained.
• The remedy ensures protection of nearby sensitive environmental areas as well as protection of
underlying aquifer used by thousands of people in the Parish.
• With the completion of the above mentioned activities, all contaminants have been contained
and exposure potential has been eliminated.
• The EPA continues to monitor the site to ensure that the site is safe and no longer poses a
threat to public health or the environment.
November 29, 1995
                                                                    BAYOU SORREL SITE

-------
BAYOU  D'INDE
(OCCIDENTAL
CHEMICAL COR
LOUISIANA
EPA ID# LA0213820533
                                     EPA REGION 6
                                     GRESSIONAL DISTRICT 7
                                        Caicasieu Parish
Site Description
Location:
Population:


Setting:
• The Occidental Chemical Corporation (Lake Charles Plant) is located west of
Louisiana Highway 108 and south of Bayou d'Inde in Sulphur, Caicasieu Parish,
Louisiana. The site is about 5 miles southwest of Lake Charles, which is in
southwest Louisiana.

• 56,120 in Lake Charles, Louisiana.
• 4,988 in Westlake, Louisiana.

0 Bayou d'Inde is an estuary west of Lake Charles, LA that is part of the
Caicasieu River Estuarine System.
Wastes and Volumes  —	

Principle Pollutants:

• PCBs, phenanthrene, xylene, hexachlorobenzene, hexachlorobutadiene, mercury, and
chromium.

Site Assessment and Ranking	
                       NPt LISTING HISTORY
                           Site HRS Score: None
                           Proposed Date: None
                        (Site has not been proposed)
                                                         November 29, 1995

-------
Site Map and  Diagram
                          Not Available At This Time
The Remediation Process 	

Sit. History:

• The Bayou d'lnde area is an industrialized area where several petrochemical and agrochemical
plants manufacture and process diverse products such as petroleum, sodium hydroxide, chlorine,
teflon, butadiene, synthetic rubber, trichloroethylene, and perchloroethylene.
• A preliminary assessment(PA) report was completed by EPA on September 11,1987.
• The site inspection (SI) was completed by EPA on January 18, 1988.
• The expanded site inspection (ESI) report was completed by EPA on September 28, 1993.
The results of the ESI sampling documented an observed release of both organic and inorganic"
compounds to the surface water.
• The NPL Hazard Ranking System (HRS) package for the site on February 3,1995. The EPA
is awaiting for a letter from the Governor of Louisiana before taking further action to list the
site on the NPL.
• The site is currently being evaluated by a Governor-appointed task force.
• EPA staff, LDEQ, NOAA, US Army Corps of Engineers, and US Fish and Wildlife Service
formed a workgroup and held a meeting on March 23,1995, to discuss the site. It was decided
that the dredging should move forward, but that the dredge spoil should be adequately
characterized.
• EPA and the workgroup established data quality objectives for the EPA contractor sampling
event and provided comments on the contractor's sampling and analysis plan.
• One of the larger and more involved PRPs at the site, Pittsburgh Paint & Glass (PPG) has
initiated an ecological risk assessment for Bayou d'lnde under the RCRA Corrective Action.
The Phase I of ecological risk assessment is scheduled to be completed in 1997 and Phase II is
scheduled to be completed in 1999.

Health Considerations:

• Human Ingestion of bioaccumulated contaminants in marine life  from fish and shellfish
harvesting in the bayou and connected waterways by local and cominercial fishermen.
Other Environmental Risks:

• The Calcasieu River, Lake Charles, and Prien Lake are estuarine in nature and have been
designated for the usage of primary and secondary contact recreational use and the propagation
of fish and wildlife.
• There are several delineated wetlands that are considered sensitive environments along Bayou
d'lnde, PPG Canal, and the Calcasieu River.
• Recreational fishing occurs in Bayou d'lnde and the PPG Canal as well as recreational and
commercial fishing occurs in the Calcasieu Ship Channel, Calcasieu River, and Prien Lake.
November 29,1995
BAYOU D'INDE (OCCIDENTAL CHEM. CORP.)

-------
Record of Decision
                     No Record of Decision has beea signed lor this pre-NPL site
Community Involvement 	
• Community Involvement activities are just beginning at this site, and are being coordinated
with the State of Louisiana.

Technical Assistance Grant  	
•  A Technical Assistance Grant will be available for this site only if it is proposed to the
National Priorities List.
Fiscal and Program Management
  Remedial Project Manager: Stacey Bennett (EPA), 214-665-6729, Mail Code: 6SF-LL
  State Contact: Tim Knight (LDEQ)
  Community Involvement Coordinator: Melanie Lillard (EPA) 214-665-2294, Mail Code 6SF-P
  Attorney: Paul Wendell (EPA) 214-665-2136, Mail Code 6SF-DL
  State Coordinator: Marilyn Owen (EPA) 214-665-8508, Mail Code:  6SF-LL
  Prime Contractor: Fluor Daniel
Cost Recovery:

• PRPs Identified: 38
• Viable PRPs:  20
• The EPA Cost Recovery contractor has completed facility profile sheets on the 10 major
PRPs, which include information on violations pertaining to NPDES, RCRA and other program
media.

Present Status and Issues  	
• The sampling of the area to be dredged is scheduled to be conducted in the month of
December 1995.
• The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Damage Assessment
and Restoration Program (DARP) is investigating the contamination of the Calcasieu estuary,
and the resultant injury to NOAA trust resources.
• EPA staff plan to meet with the mayor and other involved agencies in Louisiana to inform
them on the status of the site during the month of December 1995.
• EPA staff (cost recovery, RPM, and attorney) plan to interview the staff members of three
major PRPs (Olin, Vista, and PPG) to gain additional information before issuing 104(e) letters.
• Onsite interviews are scheduled for the 2nd quarter of FY96.
BAYOU D'INDE (OCCIEDNTAL CHEM. CORP.)
November 29, 1995

-------
Cleanup Measurements
• Addressing Bayou d'Inde contamination will ensure protection of the sensitive estuarine
environment, as well as protect the health of people who harvest marine life in the area.
November 29, 1995
BAYOU D'INDE (OCCIDENTAL CHEM. CORP.)

-------
CLEVE REB
LOUISIANA
EPA ID# LAD980501456
      EPA REGION 6
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 03
         Ascension Parish
          Other Names:
          Reber Landfill
Site Description   	

Location:     • Ascension Parish, Louisiana.
             • Between Baton Rouge and New Orleans.
             • One mile south of Highway 22 on the east side of Highway 70.

Population:    • Eleven residences close to the site.

Setting:       • Nearest residence is approximately 100 feet from the northern property line of
             the site.
             • Nearest drinking water well is located on the residence about 100 feet away
             from the site.
             • The surrounding land to the east and south are covered by dense vegetation
             arid swamp.
             • The areas to the north and west are primarily residential and agricultural.  The
             residential  areas are sparsely populated.
             • 25 acre site - an abandoned landfill that accepted both municipal and industrial
             wastes.
             • One large pond (12 acres) and three small ponds (total approximately one  acre)
             exist on-site.
             • It is estimated that 6,400 drums  are buried on-site.

Hydrology:    • The site  is underlain by approximately 250 feet of very plastic clays with low
             permeabilities.
             • Within this clay formation is a clayey/silty sand formation that varies between 3-
             10 feet in thickness, and is located 30-50 feet below the ground surface. At 200
             feet is another sand formation that is approximately 30 feet thick. This layer is
             referred to as the Deep Sand Aquifer.
             • The drinking water aquifer is  called the Norco aquifer and lies below the Deep
             Sand. The Norco Aquifer is separated from the Deep Sand by 10 feet of clay.
             • The upper sand zone (30 feet) is contaminated with low-level organics (HCB).
             There are no known users of this zone. The Norco is not contaminated and the
             potential for contamination is considered negligible.
             • The Norco is an artesian aquifer that is free-flowing for most of the year.
                                                                     November 29. 1995

-------
Wastes and Volumes
Principle pollutants include the following:
      • Hexachlorobenzene (9,500 ppm on-site waste)
      • Hexachlorobutadiene (8,600 ppm on-site waste)

Volume:
      • The estimated total volume of material buried on-site is 220,000 cu. yds., including the
      municipal waste. The ROD calls for excavating approximately 15,000 cu. yds. of drums
      and bulk sludges as source control.
      • The volume of on-site surface water is estimated to be 22,000,000 gallons, with about
      21,500,000 gallons being located in the large pond.
Site Assessment and Ranking
                            NPL UST1NG HISTORY
                              ,  Site MRS Score 4&80
                               Proposed Date: 12/30/82
                                - Final Datei9yQ8i/83 '
                                NPL Update:  Original
Site Map and Diagram
                                                Mississippi
                                                Louisiana")
                       Cleve Reber
                           Site
                               id A
              Waste Pit
            (approx. limit)
                   I	I
Pond B
Pond C

PondD
                   Cleve Reber
November 29, 1995
                             CLEVE REBER

-------
The Remediation Process
Site History:

• The site was originally cleared and used as a source of borrow material in the construction of
the embankments of the Sunshine Bridge and portions of Hwy 10.
• The site was then permitted for the disposal of municipal wastes (Ascension Parish Sanitary
Landfill).
• Environmental Controls Company, with Cleve Reber as president, leased the facility in 1970,
and from 1970 to 1974, both municipal and industrial wastes were disposed of at the site.
• The site was abandoned in 1974.
• In 1983 the State fenced the site.
• July 1983, EPA conducted an emergency action removing 1,100 surface drums and waste piles.
• A thin clay cap was placed over the areas thought to contain buried drums and wastes.
• In 1984 and 1986, EPA conducted two comprehensive field investigations that indicted all
significant contamination was restricted to the site.
• EPA completed the RI/FS in September, 1986.
• EPA signed a ROD in March, 1987.
• EPA completed all design activities in February, 1990.
• EPA issued UAO and the RA was initiated by the PRPs in April, 1991.

Health Considerations:

• Direct contact with on-site wastes.
• Potential for drinking contaminated ground water from currently unused water-bearing
formation beneath site.
• Potential for cross-contamination between the shallow sand zone and deep drinking water
aquifer of deep wells drilled in the future.

Other Environmental Risks:

• Potential for fugitive volatile emissions during construction (to be evaluated in the design).

Record  of Decision	
                                   Signed:  March 31,1987
• The remedy includes on-site thermal destruction (incineration) of drums and bulk sludges;
RCRA cap.
  Other Remedies Considered

1. No action
2. On-stte landfill
3. Offstte landfill
4. Offsite Incineration
          Reason Not Chosen
Not protective
Not long-term (Inconsistent with SARA)
Inconsistent with SARA
Not cost effective compared to on-site
CLEVE REBER
                         November 29, 1995

-------
Community Involvement
• Community Involvement Plan: Developed 05/84, revised 03/91.
• Open houses and workshops: 05/84 Press Release, 11/90, 5/91
• Original Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting:  05/85, 02/87.
• Original ROD Fact Sheet:  09/87
• Milestone Fact Sheets:   Updates 3/88 and 12/88; 2/90;9/90;  RD fact sheet; 3/90 workshop;
 fact sheet, open house 5/91,12/91, 6/94
* Citizens on site mailing list: 237
* Constituency Interest:  Medium
• Site Repository:  Ascension Parish Public Library
Technical Assistance Grant
• Availability Notice:  Yes
• Letters of Intent Received:
• Grant Award: 06/01/92
1) 6/18/88 from Ascension Superfund Koalition (ASK)
Fiscal and Program Management
  Remedial Project Manager (EPA): M. S. Ramesh, 214/665-6764, Mail Sta. 6SF-AO
  State Contact: Jayne Danage
  Community Involvement Coordinator (EPA): Melanie Lillard, 214/665-2294, Mail Sta. 6SF-P
  Attorney (EPA): Jim Costello, 214/665-8045, Mail Sta. 6SF-DL
  State Coordinator (EPA): Marilyn Owen, 214/665-8508, Mail Sta. 6SF-LL
  Prime Contractors:  Ch2MHill/USACE

Cost Recovery:
• PRPs Identified: 23
• Viable PRP:  4 (Uniroyal, Vulcan, Monochem, and Stauffer)
• Enforcement options:  PRPs are currently performing the RA under a UAO.
• EPA is currently negotiating with the PRPs for past cost and oversight cost.
Present Status and Issues
• Negotiations with PRPS regarding responsibility for RD fell through.  Federal contractors
performed RD.
• Currently in RA Phase; excavation and incineration of wastes were completed in October
1995. The remaining activities consisting of capping the site and providing vegetative cover is
expected to be complete by August 1996.
Cleanup Measurements
• The EPA has determined that fencing of the site and the removal of contaminated drums and
waste piles have significantly reduced the potential of exposure to contaminants at the Cleve
Reber facility while final cleanup activities are underway.
• Implementation of the selected source control remedy will permanently treat site wastes.
Because the site will be capped, it will not be available for future residential or
industrial/commercial development.
November 29, 1995
                                              CLEVE REBER

-------
COMBUSTIO
LOUISIANA
EPA ID# LAD072606627
                                          EPA REGION 6
                                        NGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS
                                               04&06
                                            Livingston Parish
                                            Denham Springs
Site Description

Location:
• Four miles N.E. of Denham Springs, Louisiana, at Milton Road and Burgess
Road.
Population:   • Nearest residence is 200 yards.
            • Approximately 500 people live within a 1 mile radius of the site.
Setting:
  Eleven surface impoundments of varying sizes and depths.
  Several underground and above-ground tanks.
  Waste oil recycling operation.
Hydrology:   • Impoundments are in the Pleistocene alluvium.
            • Discharge to West Colyell Creek which drains into Amite River.
Wastes and Volumes
• The principal pollutants at the Combustion, Inc. Superfund site include Lead, Benzene, Silver,
Nickel, PCBs, Toluene, Mercury, Toluenediisocyanate, and Toluene Diamine.

• The site contains approximately 29,630 drum equivalents of waste oil and sludge.
Removals, Site Assessment and Ranking 	
• Primary ranking factors: presence of airborne contaminants, and shallow ground water
contamination with 1,2-Dichloroethane.
                            NPL LISTING HISTORY
                                Site HBS Scor# 53,79
                                Proposed Date: 6/20/86
                                 final Dale: 6/24/B8
                               NPLUpdate: Nos.5&7
                                                                November 29, 1995

-------
• After proposing the Combustion, Inc. site to the NPL, the EPA determined that there were no
immediate safety actions required while awaiting the results of the site studies and cleanup
activities.
* Participating parties conducted a removal action to remove oils from the surface
impoundments, tanks and buildings at the site which was completed in the fall of 1993.
• LDEQ approved Phase I Removal workplan on October 19,1992; approved Phase II Removal
workplan on January 5,1993.
Site Map and Diagram
                                                         Combustion, Inc. Site
            Combustion, Inc. Site
                TnjoxLone
November 29, 1995
COMBUSTION, INC.

-------
The Remediation Process
Site History:

• Operated as waste oil recycling facility until 1982.
• Notices of Violation and Warning Letters issued by LDEQ for various RCRA noncompliance.
• RCRA Compliance Order issued 1/18/84.
• Enforcement Agreement between EPA and LDEQ for State Enforcement Lead signed by
LDEQ January 7,1987; signed by EPA February 7,1987.
• Interim Settlement Agreement between LDEQ and PRPs signed March 27,1987, for technical
studies of the site, the development of a RI workplan, and the evaluation of a removal action.
• Draft RI/FS Work Plan submitted August 5,1987; Second draft RI/FS Work Plan submitted to
LDEQ February 17,1987; received by EPA March 22,1988.
• RI/FS Agreement signed by all participating parties and by Louisiana Attorney General,
October 25,1988.
• Preliminary RI Report submitted to EPA on April 13,1990.
• Remedial Action Objectives submitted to EPA on August IS, 1990.
• Phase II RI/FS is currently underway. Field work began on 1/30/95 and was completed in
3/95.

Health Considerations:

• Preliminary Public Health Evaluation and Endangerment  Assessment submitted to LDEQ and
to EPA on February 16,1990.
Record of Decision
                        RI/FS Underway * No Record of
                       Decision At Thfs Time
Community Involvement
• Outreach activities are the responsibility of LDEQ
• Community Involvement Plan:  Developed 6/89
• Open houses and workshops:  9/90, 9/91, 7/92, and 5/94
• Milestone Fact Sheets: 4/89, 8/90, 2/91, 9/91, and 5/94
• Citizens on site mailing list: 36
• Constituency Interest:  A class-action citizens lawsuit is pending
  Site Repository:
Livingston Parish Library, Denham Springs/Walker Branch, 10095 Florida
Boulevard, Denham Springs, LA 70726
COMBUSTION, INC.
                                                November 29, 1995

-------
Technical Assistance Grant
  Availability Notice: 5/9/89
  Letters of Intent Received:  None - no apparent citizen interest
  Final Application Received:  N/A
  Grant Award: N/A
Fiscal and Program Management
  Remedial Project Manager: John L. Mo (EPA) 214-665-8409, Mail Code: 6SF-LL
  State Contact: Todd Thibodeaux
  Community Involvement Coordinator: Melanie O. Lfllard (EPA) 214-665-2294, Mail Code: 6SF-P
  Attorney: Jim Costello (EPA) 214-665-8045, Mail Code:  6SF-DL
  State Coordinator: Marilyn Owen (EPA) 214-665-8508, Mail Code: 6SF-LN
  Prime Contractor: Woodward-Clyde Consultants
  Prime Oversight Contractor: None

Cott Rocovery: Enforcement Agreement between EPA and the LDEQ February 9,1987.
LDEQ is responsible for obtaining settlement agreements with the PRPs.

• PRPs Identified: 87
• Viable PRP:  Steering Comittee of 28 PRPs.
Present Status and Issues
  The removal action reduced the threat of exposure to the site by area residents.
  Air monitoring during the removal was done to regulate emissions from the site.
  Phase II RI/FS is addressing ground water and off-site areas.
Cleanup Measurements
• 15,000 cubic yards of sludges and soil were excavated from the site and disposed of offeite.
• 70,000 gallons of oil sent off-site for energy recovery.
• Above ground and underground storage tanks emptied of contents, dismantled, and sent for
recycling.
November 29, 1995
                                                                    COMBUSTION, INC.

-------
D.L.  MUD,  IN
LOUISIANA
EPA ID# LAD981058019
   EPA REGION  6
NGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 07
      Vermilion Parish
                                                              Other Names:
                                                         Galveston-Houston Yard
Site Description
Location:     • 2.5 miles southwest of Abbeville, Louisiana.
             • 1.5 miles west of Vermilion River.
             • Adjacent to Gulf Coast Vacuum Services Superfund Site.

Population:    • 13,000 in Abbeville, Louisiana.
             • 50,000 in Vermilion Parish, Louisiana

Setting:       • Site is an inactive drilling mud facility and a vacant lot.
             • Approximately 2,600 people obtain drinking water, and about 1,000 acres are
             irrigated, from private wells within three miles of the site.
             • 9,000 acres are irrigated with potentially threatened surface water.
             • Site is approximately 12.5 acres.
             • The site is inactive.

Hydrology:    • Possible surface drainage to Le Boeuf Canal, Coulee Galleque, and eventually
             to Vermilion  River.
             • An average of 20 feet of alluvial terrace deposits overlie the shallow sand
             aquifer that is used for drinking water and irrigation.
Wastes and Volumes	—

Principle Pollutants:

• Mercury, chromium, arsenic, lead, zinc, barium.
• Petroleum related hydrocarbons.

Volume:

• Residual contamination at a depth of 2 feet in soil (approx. 20,000 cubic yards of soil).
• Unknown petroleum contaminants located in three abandoned pits (approx. 1100 cu. yds.).
                                                                     November 29, 1995

-------
Site Assessment and Ranking
                            NPL LISTING HISTORY
                               Site HRS Score: 32.37  *
                               Proposed Date: 6/24/88
                                 Final Date: id/4/89
                                 NPL Update: No. 7
• A former owner, Dowell-Schlumberger, commented that the score should be lowered because
they conducted a cleanup at the site. EPA responded that, even though the Louisiana
Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) accepted the cleanup as sufficient for a proper
closure, it occurred after the ranking system had taken place and therefore would not affect the
score.
Site Map and  Diagram
                 Gulf Coast
               Vacuum Service
              D.L Mud, Inc.
                                            Vermilion Parish
November 29. 1995
D.L MUD, INC.

-------
The Remediation  Process
Site History:

•Owner, Gulf Pre-mix Mud and Vacuum Service Co., sold the site in 1979 to Galveston-Houston
Fluid Services, Inc. Site sold again in 1981 to Dowell Fluid Services, a subsidiary of Dow
Chemical. Sold in 1984 or 1985 to D.L. Mud, Inc., which went out of business in 1986.
• Drilling muds and fluids were stored in 16 on-site tanks.
• LDEQ negotiated a site cleanup with Dowell Schlumberger which was done in 1987. 1.3
million pounds of solids and 14,800 gallons of liquids from the tanks were disposed, and the
tanks were dismantled.
• Soil was excavated from the tank bases and from the south end of the property.

Health Considerations:

« Potential for contamination of water supply used as drinking water for 2,600 people and of
surface water to irrigate 9,000 acres.
• Potential risk to future residents from residual surface soil contamination.

Other Environmental Risks:

• Potential for contamination of Vermillion River, which flows to the Gulf of Mexico.
Record  of Decision
                                  Signed: September 22,1994
• The ROD calls for institutional controls (deed restrictions, fencing) to address low level risks
from surface soil contaminated with residual barium.
• Excavation and offsite disposal of contaminated sludges and subsurface soils.
• Limited ground water monitoring to ensure that residual barium contaminants left onsite do
not migrate into usable drinking water sources.
                Other Remedies Considered and Reason Not Chosen
1. No Action
2. Soil Capping
3. Barium Treatment
4. Biological Landfarming
Does not meet long-term effectiveness and permanence.
Effectiveness and cost not justified against selected remedy.
Potential implementation problems and high cost.
Potential implementation problems and questionable
effectiveness.
D.L MUD, INC.
                                      November 29, 1995

-------
Community Involvement
  Community Involvement Plan:  Developed 11/90.
  Open houses and workshops:  9/90,10/93, 8/95
  Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting:  4/94, 5/94
  ROD Fact Sheet: 3/95
  Milestone Fact Sheets: 5/90; 12/93 -
  Citizens on site mailing list: 334
  Constituency Interest: Citizens/residents not opposed to EPA's selected remedy.
  Site Repository: Vermilion Parish Library, 200 North Street, Abbeville, LA 70511
Technical Assistance Grant
• Availability Notice: 08/04/89
• Letters of Intent Received:  08/20/89
       1) Vermilion Association to Protect the Environment (VAPE)
• Final Application Received: VAPE submitted final application for grant on 6/1/90.
• Grant Award: 9/27/90
• Current Status: Wilma Subra is the designated VAPE Technical Advisor
Fiscal and Program Management
  Remedial Project Manager:  John L. Mo (EPA) 214-665-8409, Mail Code: 6SF-LL
  State Contact: Rich Johnson
  Community Involvement Coordinator: Melanie O. Lillard (EPA) 214-665-2294, Mail Code: 6SF-P
  Attorney: George Malone (EPA) 214-665-2157, Mail Code: 6SF-DL
  State Coordinator: Marilyn Owen (EPA) 214-665-8508, Mail Code: 6SF-LL
  Prime Contractor:  None
Cost Recovery:  PRP Lead (Enforcement)

• PRPs Identified:  97
• Viable PRP: Several
• General Notice/104(e) letters issued 8/89
• Special Notice Letters issued 12/89
• Administrative Order on Consent requiring PRPs to conduct RI/FS was signed June 21,1990.
November 29, 1995
D.L MUD, INC.

-------
Present Status and  Issues
•The removal of soils, muds, and solid waste by the potentially responsible parties and the
LDEQ eliminated the sources of contamination and reduced the potential of exposure to
contamination at the D.L. Mud site.
• Findings from the Remedial Investigation indicate low level risks still onsite.
• PRPs conducted Feasibility Study to address low level risks.
• Proposed Plan issued in March 1994 describes EPA's preferred alternative of institutional
controls (deed restrictions, fencing) to address low level risks from residual surface soil
contamination and excavation and offsite disposal of subsurface soil contamination associated
with the pit bottoms.
• Record of Decision issued in September 1994 describes the selected remedy (EPA's preferred
alternative) and responds to public comment on the Proposed Plan.
• PRP Special Notice Letters to start RD/RA negotiations planned for Winter 1995/1996.
Cleanup Measurements
• Selected remedy at the site addresses barium residuals in approximately 20,000 cubic yards of
surface soils and 1,100 cubic yards of pit bottoms contaminated with tentatively identified
organics.
• Remediation of wastes conforms to appropriate provisions of Louisiana Statewide Order 29-B
Pit Closure Requirements.
• Risk reduction will be necessary to protect the health of potential future site-area residents.
D.L. MUD, INC.
November 29, 1995

-------

-------
DUTCHTOWN
TREATMENT PLANT
LOUISIANA
EPA ID# LAD980879449
     EPA REGION 6
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 03
        Ascension Parish
Site Description	

Location:    • Dutchtown, Ascension Parish, Louisiana.
           • Location at the juncture I-10 and Highway 74.

Population:   • 4,000 people live within three miles of the site.

Setting:     • Site had ten storage tanks, a rail car tanker, a 0.07 acre oil pit, and a 0.8 acre
           holding pond containing oil and water.
           • Site area is five acres.
Hydrology:   • Within Mississippi River watershed.
           • Surficial silty loam with poor drainage; silty. clay at 8-12 ft. depth; clay and silty
           clay at 8-24 ft. depth.
           • Contaminated shallow sand aquifer at 7-12 ft. depth; deeper aquifer at 30-35 ft.
           appears not to be contaminated.
Wastes and Volumes
• The principle pollutants on the site include benzene, ethylbenzene; toluene; and, lead.
• Holding pond 1.2 million gallons.
• Storage tanks 60,900 gallons.
Site Assessment and Ranking
                           NPL LISTING HISTORY
                              Site HRS Score: 36.41
                              Proposed Date; 1/22/87
                               final Dale:; 7/22/87
                               NPl, Update: No. 6
                                                             November 29, 1995

-------
Site Map and Diagram
  Dutchtown
        t
    ^74
                         N
    Ascension Parish
                                    Small
                                    Waste
                                    Tanks
                                                             Holding
                                                              Pond
                Secondary
               Containment
Railroad Tank Car

 Horizontal Tanks

 Processing Bldgs
r  Vertical]
       Office
        and
      Garage

   Access Road
                                                  Dutchtown
The Remediation Process  —.	


Site History:

• Oil refinery and reclamation facility from 1965 - January 1982.
• State had owner (now deceased) develop a closure plan in 1982. The plan was rejected.
• In 1984, the State performed an investigation and identified contaminated surface soils, sludges
and water. The upper aquifer was also found to be contaminated.
• The State undertook two emergency actions in 1984 to prevent overflow of the on-site
lagoon/holding pond.
November 29, 1995
                                                   DUTCHTOWN TREATMENT PLANT

-------
 • EPA cleaned up a diesel fuel spill that ran offsite, in March 1987. PRPs began an Expedited
 Response Action (ERA) removal in November 1990. Waste handling phase of ERA completed
 on August 27, 1991.  The ERA was fully completed on October 5, 1991.
 • The Remedial Investigation (RI) and Risk Assessment was approved by EPA on 12/23/92.
 • The revised Feasibility Study (FS) was approved by EPA on 5/19/93.

 Health Considerations:

 • Inhalation of fumes, contamination of drinking water, direct contact with waste pits and
 storage tanks contents.

 Other Environmental Risks:

 • Grand Goudine Bayou is 1,875 feet downslope from site.

 Record  of Decision	
                                     Signed: March 1988
                                  Expedited Response Action
                                  ROD Sighed: June 20, 1994
• Thermal destruction offsite of the ponds and tanks contents. Treatment of contaminated soils
and contaminated water.
• Natural attenuation of contaminated ground water with contingencies if contaminated
ground water migrates out or down from the current location.
  Other Remedies Considered

• No Action
• In-Site Biological Treatment
• Ground Water Extraction, Treatment, Discharge
          Reason Not Chosen
» Not protective
• Active remediation not currently warranted
• Active remediation not currently warranted
Community Involvement
• Community Involvement Plan:  Developed 05/89.
• Open houses and workshops:  09/89; 01/90; 10/90.
• Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting:  02/88, 10/93.
• ROD Fact Sheet: 7/94
• Milestone Fact Sheets:   12/87 removal fact sheet, 6/88, 9/88, 12/88, 4/89 update, 2/91 update
(by PRPs), 4/91 update (by PRPs).

• Citizens on site mailing list: 334
• Constituency Interest: Ground water contamination; offsite transport of hazardous materials;
on-site discharge; air emissions

• Site Repository:  Ascension Parish Library
DUTCHTOWN TREATMENT PLANT
                        November 29, 1995

-------
Technical Assistance Grant
• Availability Notice:  Yes
• Letters of Intent Received:
      1) 6/18/88 from Ascension Superfund Koalition (ASK)
• Grant Award:  06/01/92
Fiscal and Program Management	

• Remedial Project Manager: John L. Mo (EPA) 214-665-8409, Mail Code:  6SF-LL
• State Contact: Tom Stafford                                    '
• Community Involvement Coordinator: Melanie Lillard (EPA) 214-665-2294, Mail Code: 6SF-P
• Attorney: Mike Barra (EPA)
• State Coordinator: Marilyn Owen (EPA) 214-665-8508, Mail Code: 6SF-LL
• Prime Contractor:  PRP/Woodward Clyde Consultants
Cost Recovery:
                 85
• PRPs Identified:
• Viable PRP: 50
• The EPA and approximately 20 PRPs agreed to all the terms of a Consent Decree for the
ERA on March 1,1989. The Consent Decree starting the ERA was entered on 5/23/90.
• The EPA and 20 PRPs agreed to the terms of an Administrative Order On Consent for the
RI/FS. The RI/FS began August 7,1989.
 Present Status and Issues	

 • Expedited Response Action is complete.
 • RI/FS is complete.
 • UAO/AOC for ground water RD/RA under negotiation.
 Cleanup Measurements	—	

 • 4500 cubic yards of contaminated soil were excavated, treated, placed onsite, and capped
 during the Expedited Response Action.
 • The emergency actions taken to prevent overflow of a contaminated lagoon, cleanup of a
 diesel fuel spill and capping over a contaminated area at the Dutchtown Treatment Plant site
 have limited the spread of contaminated wastes and have lessened the potential for exposure to
 contaminants at the site. Thus, the site is safer while it awaits further long-term cleanup actions.
 November 29, 1995
                                                         DUTCHTOWN TREATMENT PLANT

-------
GULF COAST
VACUUM SERVI
LOUISIANA
EPA ID# LAD980750137
Site Description
 EPA REGION 6
GRESSIONAL DISTRICT 07
    Vermilion Parish

     Other Nam**:
 Galvaston-Houston Yard
Location:     • Approximately 2.5 miles southwest of Abbeville, Vermilion Parish.
             • 1.5 miles west of the Vermilion River.
             • Adjacent to the south is the D.L. Mud, Inc. Superfund site.

Population:    • Approximately 2,600 people

Setting:       • Approximately 2,600 people obtain drinking water and about 1,000 acres are
             irrigated by private wells within three miles of the site.
             • 9,000 acres are irrigated with potentially threatened surface water.
             • Site is surrounded by agricultural and residential land.

Hydrology:    • The site is located above the shallow sand of Abbeville Unit of the Upper
             Chicot aquifer.
             • The Abbeville Unit is the primary source of drinking water.
             • Surface water drainage  is to the LeBoeuf Canal or to the north drainage which
             flows to the Coulee Galleque.
Wastes and Volumes
1.  Principle Pollutants:
      • The contaminants in the site sludges and shallow aquifer include benzene, toluene,
      mercury, lead, chromium, arsenic, barium and numerous organic compounds.
      • The contaminants in the site soils included arsenic and barium.

2.  Volume: .
      • Estimated 15,000 cubic yards of sludge in the 3 pits.
      • Estimated 43,857 gallons of sludge and liquid in the five above ground tanks.
      • 19,500 cubic yards of contaminated soil in the northeast and northwest site fields.

Site Assessment and  Ranking 	
                             NPL UST1NG HISTORY
                                 Site HRS Score: 42.78
                                Proposed Date; 5/84/86
                                  Final Date: 3/31/89
                                  NPL Update No. 7
                                                                  November 29, 1995

-------
Site Map and Diagram
                  Gulf Coast
               Vacuum Service
                          A
                   D.L Mud, Inc.
                                                 Vermilion Parish
The Remediation Process	

Site History:

• Inactive facility, which handled wastes primary associated from oil and gas exploration. The
company operated from approximately 1969 until 1984 when it filed for bankruptcy.
• Many types of oilfield wastes were dumped in two main pits on the site which created about
15,000 cubic yards of contaminated sludge.
• Waste was dumped illegally and indiscriminately at the site and the owner/operator both
falsified and destroyed records.
• Site ownership is in question, however, it is believed that because the site owner is bankrupt
and taxes have not been paid on the property, the site is owned by Vermilion Parish.
• March - May 1990 and February - March 1991, EPA emergency removal funds used: to repair
fence, replace warning signs, collect and analyze samples, construct holding levee, pump and
treat waste water from pits.

• April 1992, due to heavy rainfall, waste water from pits was pumped and treated again.

• A total of 1,250,000 gallons were pumped and treated during emergency removal actions.

• The interim action, Operable Unit 2, was performed by  15 PRPs under a 12/11/92 unilateral
Administrative Order and completed in January 1994. This action consolidated and covered the
sludges so that rainwater could not accumulate on them and become contaminated.
     November 29, 1995
                                                          GULF COAST VACUUM SERVICES

-------
Health Considerations:

• Direct contact and upstream risk; also a potential groundwater threat.

Other Environmental Risks:

• Potential for contamination of Vermilion River.

Record  of Decision	
                                 Signed: September 30,1992
Amended Record of Decision  Signed:  May 5, 1995

Operable Unit 1 - Final Source Action

Site Soils and Sludges

• SELECTED REMEDY:  Onsite biological treatment of organic contaminated sludges/soils;
stabilization of inorganic soils.
 Other Remedies Considered

   1.  No Action
   2.  On-site stabilization/
      solidification/ disposal
   3.  Off-site incineration
                                                Reason Not Chosen
                                       Not protective

                                       Does not address organic
                                       Too costly for benefit received.
Operable Unit 2 - Interim Action
                         4
Ground Water


• SELECTED REMEDY: Source Control (Pit dewatering and consolidation) and monitoring.

 Other Remedies Considered             	Reason Not Chosen
                                             Not protective
                                             Too expensive
   1.  No Action
   2.  Continual pump out treat

Community Involvement  	

• Community Involvement Plan:  Developed 11/90
• Open houses and workshops:  9/90, 7/92
• Original Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting:  7/92.
• Amended Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting: 10/94.
• Milestone Fact Sheets: 04/91, 08/91, 7/92
• Citizens on site mailing list: 328

• Site Repository:  Vermilion Parish Library in Abbeville, Louisiana
    GULF COAST VACUUM SERVICES
                                                                      November 29, 1995

-------
Technical Assistance  Grant
  Availability Notice: 08/04/89
  Letters of Intent Repeived:
       1) 8/29/89 from Vermilion Association to Protect the Environment (V.A.P.E.).
  Final Application Received:
  Grant Award: 09/27/90.
  Current Status: TA, Wilma Subfa
Fiscal and Program  Management
  Remedial Project Manager (EPA): Kathleen Aisling, 214/665-8509, Mail Sta. 6SF-LN
  State Contact: Rich Johnson
  Community Involvement Coord. (EPA): Melanie Ontiveros Lillard, 214/665-2294, Mail Sta. 6SF-P
  Attorney (EPA): Keith Smith, 214/665-2157, Mail Sta. 6SF-DL
  State Coordinator (EPA): Marilyn Owen, 214/665-8508, Mail Sta. 6SF-LL
  Prime Contractor:  RI/FS - Sverdrup
                RD/RA Oversight - Sverdrup Environmental

Cost Recovery: PRP Lead (Enforcement)

• PRPs Identified:  400+
• Viable PRP: 150+
Present Status and Issues
• General Notice/104(e) letters issued 8/89.
• Pursue PRP lead RI/FS.
• Special Notice Letters issued 12/89.
• The 60-day RI/FS moratorium ended 2/8/90.
• RI/FS was Fund lead.
• ROD issued 9/92.
• UAO issued 12/11/92 for Interim Action. 15 PRPs complied; completed 1/94.
• Special notice issued for source control - Operable Unit 1, 2/93.
• The Region has negotiated a CD with the site PRPs to conduct the RD/RA and use biological
treatment instead  of incineration for the organics.
• The CD was entered June 5,1995.
• A de minimis settlement with 54 PRPs became effective 9/26/94.  Three million dollars was
recovered under the settlement and is being used for EPA activities at the site.
 Cleanup Measurements
The completion of OU2 activities eliminated the threat of overflow of accumulated rainwater
contaminated by the sludge pits, thereby reducing the direct contact threat to nearby residents
and the threat to the local drinking water supplies. The sludge has been consolidated and
covered and is stable awaiting initiation of OU1 activities which are in the remedial design phase.

If the site is not cleaned-up, it will continue to act as a source of contamination of the shallow
aquifer used for both drinking water and irrigation in the area.
     November 29, 1995
                                                            GULP COAST VACUUM SERVICES

-------
GULF  STAT
UTILITIES
LOUISIANA
EPA ID# LAD985169317
   EPA REGION 6
NGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 07
      Calcasieu Parish
                                                             Othor Names:
                                                      North Ryan Street Utilities Yard
Site Description   	

Location:     • 303 North Ryan Street, Lake Charles, Louisiana.

Population:    • 56,120 in Lake Charles, Louisiana.
             • 4,988 in Westlake, Louisiana.

Setting:       • Situated on the south bank of the Calcasieu River, just south of the River Road
             and North Ryan Street intersection, the site consists of east and west service yards
             separated by North Ryan Street. A 6 acre wetlands area was included as part of
             the site due to landfill activities associated with historical site operations.
             • The site is currently operated as the Lake Charles Division Service Center of
             the Gulf States Utilities Company (GSU).
             • The east service yard is 3 to 4 acres and the west service yard is approximately
             16 acres in size. The area east of North Ryan Street was originally leased by
             GSU for storage; however, it is no longer used.  The west service yard is used as a
             storage area and a repair center associated with Lake Charles Service Center
             operations. The wetlands area located on the west service yard is covered with
             shells and soil.
             • The site is bounded to the south by commercial business, to the west by the
             City of Lake Charles property, to the southwest by the Greater Lake Charles
             Water Company and the wastewater treatment plant, and to the east by
             residential areas.
Wastes and Volumes	

Principle Pollutants:

• Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) associated with coal gasification process.
• Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) associated with landfill activities.
• Volatile Organic Analytes (VOAs) associated with a former underground storage tank area.
                                                                    November 29, 1995

-------
Site Assessment and Ranking
                           NPL UST1NG HISTORY
                               Site HRS Score:'50.43
                               Proposed Date: 2/13/95
                                  • Final Date;
                           NPL Update: No. NPL-U18-2-S^R6
Site Map and Diagram
                                 North Ryan
                                  Street Site
                SOUTHERN PACIFIC
                     iniiiin
                                                Lake Charles,
                                                     Louisiana
The Remediation Process	——

SH» History:

• Gas production at the North Ryan Street Site appears to have begun around 1916 by the Lake
Charles Gas Company. The Lake Charles Gas Company operated the plant until 1924.  The
plant was operated by the Lake Charles Electric Company in 1925, and by the Louisiana Electric
Company, Inc. in 1926. GSU operated the plant between 1927 and 1932, when manufactured
gas production ceased at the facility, and the property was reportedly sold to United Gas Public
Service Company.
 November 29, 1995
GULF STATES UTILITIES
(GSU-North Ryan Street)

-------
• The annual production of gas during the years of operation at the North Ryan Street Site
ranged from approximately 50 to 85 million cubic feet. Manufactured gas was phased out in
1932 when natural gas service became available to the city vof Lake Charles. GSU currently
operates and matains the service center at the site.
• The coal tar by-products generated during gas plant activities were reportedly disposed of into
marshlands west of the gas plant.  The size of the wetlands area was approximately 6 acres. After
the gas plant ceased operation, the wetlands area was used as a landfill for the disposal of
electrical equipment and poles, appliances, and other debris. Transformers, capacitors, drums
containing used transformer oil were also reported to have been disposed of in this area.  By
1980, the area was at its capacity and was filled and covered with shells and soil.  This  area is
now used as an equipment storage area.   An area of exposed coal tar, referred to as the tar
outcropping (approximately 8 feet by 8 feet), has been identified at the northern portion of this
former wetlands area. GSU has placed an aluminum covering over this seep area (observed on
site trip 8/17/95).
• The manufactured gas plant (MGP) structures have been dismantled; however, remnants of •
the gas plant foundation are still present onsite and the area is currently used for storage.  The
crude oil storage tanks were reportedly fill in by 1990 and the gas  holder foundation is still
visible onsite (4-foot high structure).
• Potential problems were first identified in 1988 during an inspection conducted by the
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ).  In September 1988, LDEQ issued a
compliance order to GSU to conduct remedial activities at the GSU-North Ryan Street site.
GSU conducted phased investigative work required under this order beginning in December
1988 and continuing through October 1990.
• In response to concerns over the quality of investigative work being conducted, EPA
conducted a site inspection (SI) at the site which included sampling activities during the week of
October 1,1990, and the completion of an SI report in September 1992.
• Samples collected during SI field activities from Calcasieu River sediments revealed  that
contaminants attributable to the GSU-North Ryan Street  facility were being released to the
Calcasieu River.
•  In 1992, EPA began informal negotiations with GSU on site remedial strategy.  However,
these  negotiations were not concluded due to a lack of resources at EPA and GSU's
unwillingness to proceed without deferrment on the NPL ranking process.
•  The Site was proposed  to the NPL on February 13,1995. GSU, EPA, and LDEQ have
agreed informally upon a site strategy which includes an Engineering Evaluation and Cost
Analysis (EE/CA) in support of a non-time-critical removal action and a Remedial Investigation
and Feasibility Study for any concerns not addressed as part of the EE/CA (e.g., groundwater
connection to river, etc.).

Health Considerations:

• Potential direct contact threat for onsite workers and trespassers with surficial coal tar residue
in soils and sediments onsite.
• Potential migration of contaminants into groundwater and/or surface water increases potential
risk of exposure for off-site receptors.
• The Calcasieu River, a recreational fishery, is within 60 feet directly north of the GSU-North
Ryan Street facility.
• Lake Charles and Prien Lake are within 15 miles of the site in the Calcasieu surface water
system and are also recreational fisheries.
GULF STATES UTILITIES
(GSU-North Ryan Street)
November 29, 1995

-------
Otfwr Environmental Risks:

• The Calcasieu River, Lake Charles, and Prien Lake are estuarine in nature and have been
designated for the usage of primary and secondary contact recreational use and the propagation
of fish and wildlife.
• Wetland areas contiguous to surface water downstream of the site are abundant.
Record of Decision
                                      Not Yet Signed
Community Involvement
• Community Involvement Plan:
• Open houses and workshops:  City Officials briefing 3/95
• Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting:
• ROD Fact Sheet:
• Milestone Fact Sheets:
• Citizens on site mailing list:
• Constituency Interest:
• Site Repository:    Calcasieu Parish Library, Sulphur Regional Branch, 1160 Ryan St.,
                   Sulphur, LA 70663
Technical Assistance Grant

• Availability Notice:
• Letters of Intent Received:
• Final Application Received:
• Grant Award:
• Current Status:
 Fiscal and Program Management
 • Remedial Project Manager (EPA): Cynthia Kaleri, 214/665-6772, Mail Sta. 6SF-LL
 • State Contact  Tim Knight
 • Community Involvement Coordinator (EPA):  Melanie Lillard, 214/665-2294, Mail Sta. 6SF-P
 • Attorney (EPA): Jonathon Weisberg, 214/665-2180, Mail Sta. 6SF-DL
 • State Coordinator (EPA):  Marilyn Owen, 214/665-8508, Mail Sta. 6SF-LL
 • Prim* Contractor  N/A
 November 29, 1995
GULF STATES UTILITIES
(GSU-North Ryan Street)

-------
Cost Recovery:

• PRPs Identified: 1
• Viable PRP:  1
•/ General Notice/104(e) letters issued in 1991 to Stone & Webster to obtain information about
their involvement at the Site.
• Special Notice Letter issued on July 25,1995 to Entergy Corporation, parent corporation to
GSU.  GSU provides a good faith offer via correspondence dated July 31,1995.
Present Status and  Issues
•  EPA is currently negotiating an Administrative Order on Consent for clean-up actions with
the PRP at this site. Site strategy includes a streamlined Engineering and Cost Analysis for
support of a Non-Time-Critical Removal Action with an RI/FS for any problems  not addressed
as part of the Removal Action  (e.g., groundwater connection to river, etc.).
GULF STATES UTILITIES
(GSU-North Ryan Street)
November 29, 1995

-------

-------
 HIGHWAY 71/72  (OLD
 CITGO) REFINERY
 LOUISIANA
 EPA ID# LAD981054075
                                        REGION 6
                               CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 04
                                         Bossier Parish
                                         Bossier City
Site Description
Location:
Population:   •

Setting:      •
Hydrology:
The Highway 71/72 (Old Citgo) Refinery Site is located in downtown
Bossier City, Louisiana, about 2 miles east of downtown Shreveport and
1,800 feet northeast of the Red River. The former refinery site consisted
of about 215 acres.

Bossier City (population 52,721 in 1990)

The site is primarily urban. In 1966 and 1967, the site was cleared for
development. From 1968 to the present, the site has been fully developed.
Private residences, multi-family dwellings, and commercial and light
industrial  establishments now cover a large portion of the former refinery
site.

The site is located approximately  1,800 ft. northeast of the Red River.
The Red River flows in a south to southeasterly direction across Bossier
and Caddo Parishes and eventually empties into the Mississippi River.
The uppermost occurrence of ground water is in the Quaternary age
alluvial deposits of the Red River. Ground water in the alluvial deposits is
generally under artesian pressure.
Wastes and Volumes
      Concentrations of lead up to 11,000 ppm in some surface soils accessible to the public.

      Floating, free-phase hydrocarbon liquid on shallow groundwater (1,234,000 gallons).

      Hydrocarbon gases were detected in the soil on over 25% of the former refinery site.

      Tar-like material containing polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons oozes to the surface in
      some residential and commercial areas.

      More than half a dozen waste deposits are buried under developed properties.
                                                                 November 29, 1995

-------
Site Assessment and Ranking
                             NPL L1STIMG HISTORY
                                 Site HRS Score: 50.00  „
                                Proposed Date; 2/13/95
                                     Final Date:
                                 NPL Update: No. 18
Site Map and Diagram
The Remediation Process 	—	

SH« History:

•     1923- Louisiana Oil Refining Corporation built a refinery on the Site for the production
       of home heating and fuel oils. The site included a 120-acre bulk storage area and a 95-
       acre refinery process area.

•     1936 to 1948- Arkansas Fuel Oil Company operated the refinery.

•     1948- refinery operations shut down and process equipment was dismantled leaving tanks,
       bulk storage and railroad tank car cleaning operations.

•     1953- the Arkansas Fuel Oil Company merged with Arkansas Natural Gas Corporation to
       form the Arkansas Fuel Oil Corporation (AFOC).
 November 29, 1995
                                                   HIGHWAY 71/72 (OLD CITQO) REFINERY

-------
•      1955- tanks and bulk storage were leased to third parties.

•      1961- AFOC's name was changed to Cities Service Oil Company.

•      1967- Site was cleared of tanks and refinery equipment for development as a commercial
       and residential area.

•      1982- Cities Service Oil Company was acquired by OXY USA, Inc.

•      1986- the site was evaluated by using the old (no ingestion pathway) HRS model; it
       scored below 28.5.

•      1988- EPA referred the site to LDEQ for action under State authority.

•      1990- 47 families were evacuated from an on-site apartment complex due to high indoor
       air quality problems related to hydrocarbon gas seepage. (Several units are still
       unoccupied).  Two hotels periodically close  several first floor rooms due customer
       complaints of noxious odors and headaches.

•      1991 to 1994- Site was investigated by OXY USA, Inc. (OXY) under an administrative
       agreement with LDEQ. The investigation included soil, surface and ground water
       samples.

•      1992- EPA conducted an expanded site inspection to reevaluate the site using the revised
       HRS model that reflects ingestion  pathway.

•      1994- OXY and LDEQ announce that studies show no emergency health risks on site,
       potential  for long term health  risks are recognized.  LDEQ asks EPA to complete site
       evaluation under federal authorities and resources.

•      1995- The Highway 71/72 (aka "Old Citgo) site was proposed for addition to the e
       National Priorities List of Superfund sites.

Health Considerations:

•      Areas where lead wastes are in surface soils could present health threats to children.

•      Indoor air pollution may render living units unfit for human habitation.

•      Liquid hydrocarbons on surface groundwater may be a source of indoor air pollution.

•      Buried wastes may present a health threat if excavated and improperly  disposed of in the
       future.

Other Environmental Risks:

•      Ecological risks  are indeterminate  at this time due to the urban nature of the site.
HIGHWAY 71/72 (OLD CITGO) REFINERY
November 29, 1995

-------
Record of Decision
                                   Signed:  None to date
Community Involvement
• Community Involvement Plan: In final development
• Open houses and workshops: 2/95, 6/95, 8/95
• Original Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting:
• Original ROD Fact Sheet:
• Milestone Fact Sheets: 2/15/95
• Citizens on site mailing list: 1500
• Site Repository:    Bossier Parish Library, 2206 Beckett, Bossier City, LA
Technical Assistance Grant
  Availability Notice: March 1995
  Letters of Intent Received: None
  Final Application Received: None
  Grant Award:  None
  Current Status:
Fiscal and Program Management
• Remedial Project Manager (EPA): Warren Arthur, 214/665-8504, Mail Sta. 6SF-LL
• Slate Contact: Charles Andrews, LDEQ, 504/765-0487
• Community Involvement Coord. (EPA): Melanie Lillard, 214/665-2294, Mail Sta. 6SF-P
• Attorney (EPA): Jim Costello, 214/665-8045, Mail Sta. 6SF-DL
• State Coordinator (EPA):  Marilyn Owen, 214/665-8508, Mail Sta. 6SF-LL
• EPA Prime Contractor: Mission Research Corporation, Albuquerque, NM
• PRP Prime Contractor: Conestoga Rovers Associates,  Ontario Canada
Cost Recovery:

• PRPs Identified:
CanadianOXY Offshore Production Co. is the corporate successor (OXY
USA Inc. is the indemnitor, with contractural liability for, CanadianOXY)
  Viable PRP's:     Canadian OXY Offshore Production Company
 Present Status and Issues
       EPA's proposed addition of the site to the NPL resulted in strong criticism from
       members of Congress involved in reauthorization of the Superfund law and from OXY
       USA.  OXY submitted over 2,000 pounds of comments in opposition to proposed NPL
       status.
 November 29, 1995
                                                    HIGHWAY 71/72 (OLD CITGO) REFINERY

-------
       Special Notice letters were sent to OXY on June 5 requesting a good faith offer to
       removal lead contaminated soils and complete hydrocarbon contamination sudies.

       EPA's July, 1995 appropriations legislation chided the agency for adversely affecting the
       Bossier City economy and for requiring unnecessary additional tests.

       In a July 21 meeting facilitated by Congressman McCrery's staff, EPA met with OXY,
       LDEQ, and Bossier City officials  to discuss concerns of all parties. As a result of this
       meeting, EPA proposed an 'Agreement in Principle' among participants.

       By September 10 all four parties (EPA, LDEQ, OXY, and Bossier City) signed the
       Agreement in Principle. The Agreement provides for:

             EPA to precede to remedy selection without additional preliminary testing:

             OXY to remove surface soils with more than 500 ppm  lead under an
             administrative order on consent.

             OXY and EPA to agree to a judicial consent decree that provides for pumping
             and treatment of liquid hydrocarbons on shallow groundwater, corrective action at
             living units with indoor air pollution caused by the site, and a trust fund to pay for
             disposal of wastes uncovered in the future.

             the City and State will establish institutional controls for the site.
Cleanup Measurements
       Innovative partnership with PRP's and the community- The Agreement in Principle
       unifies government interests at the site and accelerates site actions.  Instead of up to 8
       years of additional study (the national average for these types of sites), final cleanup of
       contaminated soils will begin less than a year from the proposed addition of the site to
       the NPL.  The agreement also provides for the community to avoid the 'stigma' of
       Superfund designation since final placement on the NPL will not be needed while OXY
       follows thorough on site agreements.
HIGHWAY 71/72 (OLD CITGO) REFINERY
November 29, 1995

-------

-------
LOUISIANA AR
AMMUNITION
PLANT
LOUISIANA
EPA ID# LA0213820533
Site Description

Location:           •
                                      EPA REGION 6
                                    GRESSIONAL DISTRICT 05
                                         Webster Parish
Population:


Setting:
Hydrology:
• 22 miles east of Shreveport on U.S. Highway 80, in Bossier and Webster
Parishes.

• Approximately 10,250 people live in this predominantly agricultural
area, within 2 miles of the site.

• Nearest drinking water well is 1,968 feet.
• The installation covers 14,974 acres of level to slightly rolling forest land
near the towns of Minden and Doyline.  The HRS ranking was based on
16 one-acre leaching pits. (Area P.)

• The Terrace aquifer lies approximately 20 feet below land surface and is
reportedly used for drinking water in surrounding areas. Water supplies
on the facility are provided by the 300 foot sands (Wilcox aquifer).
• Analytical tests performed to date show that no contamination of the
area drinking water wells has occurred, and that contamination has not
migrated from the shallow aquifers to the deeper aquifers.
• Migration of the waste appears to be retarded in the vertical direction
by the Cane River Formation (CRF). The CRF forms a lower
hydrogeologic boundary to the Terrace Aquifer and an upper confining
unit for the Wilcox Aquifer acrols most  of the installation.
• The updated Remedial Investigation, however, shows that the CRF
pinches out west  of Area P. This creates a situation where the upper
Terrace deposits  lay directly on top of the Wilcox formation. Thus, a
possible hydrogeologic connection between the contaminated Terrace
aquifer and deeper Wilcox aquifer does  exist.
• The Army contends that a Corps of Engineers study shows that no real
connection exists because the deeper aquifers of the Wilcox are overlain
by substantial clay members of this same formation.
Wastes and Volumes
• The shallow ground water is contaminated by explosive wastes including the explosives, RDX
up to 27,000 parts per million (ppm) and TNT up to 25,000 ppm.
                                                                   November 29, 1995

-------
• The Army incinerated 105,000 tons of contaminated soils and sludges from Area P.
Contaminated soils from other operable units have been addressed in the Feasibility Study for
the first 7 study areas.
Site Assessment and Ranking
                           NPL LISTING HISTORY
                               Site HRS Score: 30.60
                              Proposed Dale: 10/15/B4
                             .   Final Date: 3/31/89
                                NPL Update: No. 2
Site Map and Diagram
 The Remediation Process	

 Stt» History:

 • The plant began producing explosives in 1942.  Several contractors have operated the facility.
 The current contractor is Thiokol Corporation.
 • The Phase I investigation was completed by the Army in May 1978, and was received by EPA
 in January 1985.
 • The Phase II, Stage 1 investigation was completed in September 1982.
 November 29. 1995
                                                    LOUISIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT

-------
 • RI for ground water was completed in January 1987.
 • RI/FS for soil contamination in Area P was completed in August 1987.
 • An updated RI for the ground water is ongoing.  Sampling began in June 1990, and should be
 completed in early 1991.              ,              4  ,
 • FS for ground water was completed in 1993.
 • EPA and Army agreed on schedule for completion of the ground water RI/FS in April 1989.
 • An Interim Response Action (IRA) which consisted of incineration of contaminated soils and
 sludges from Area P was completed in early April 1990.  The initial IRA work plan required the
 Army to excavate the lagoons to a depth of five feet. If soil contamination in the lagoons was
 greater than 500 ppm of total nitro bodies, the Army would continue to excavate in one foot
 increments until the soil contamination was 500 ppm or less of total nitro.  The excavated soils
 and sludges were incinerated on-site with the resulting clean ash to be placed back into the
 lagoons.
 • The original schedule submitted by the Army showed that the IRA would be completed in
 August of 1990.  However, the Army informed the EPA that recent investigations showed that
 the contamination of Area P is not as  extensive as originally stated. The Army formally
.requested on October 26, 1989, that the cleanup criteria be revised to reflect a smaller amount of
 soils and sludges to be excavated and incinerated.  The EPA, in conjunction with the Louisiana
 Department of Environmental Quality, reviewed this request. EPA approved this change to the
 cleanup criteria on December 21,  1989. The new cleanup criteria required that the lagoon in
 Area P be excavated to 100 ppm total explosives.  This averages a depth of excavation of two to
 three feet. The  excavation and incineration at Area P was completed in April 1990.  Capping of
 the lagoons in Area P was completed in October 1990.  Operation and maintenance of the area
 is ongoing.
 • RI & Risk Assessment approved on March 23,1992, for seven areas. Ground water was put
 into a separate operable unit to include ground water from all 20 areas under consideration.
 Proposed plan completed in 11/95. Possible public meeting in 1/96.
 • Draft RI submitted 11/94 for Y-Line.,
 • Draft RI/FS Workplan for 12 new areas submitted 12/94. Revised RI/FS work plan submitted
 in 3/95.  Final RI/FS work plan in 11/95.  Field work began in 11/95.

 Health Considerations:

 • Shallow contaminated aquifer is hydraulically connected with the deep Wilcox aquifer used by
 the facility as a potable water supply.

 Other Environmental Risks:

 • Some residents in the surrounding areas may use the shallow ground water for drinking.
 Record of Decision
                  Signed; Interim Response Action - 01/31/89, Area P only. Approved
                  with signatures on Federal Facility Agreement (FFA)
 Remedy:

 • Incineration of site wastes (responsibility of the U.S. Army)
 LOUISIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT
                                                                         November 29, 1995

-------
Community Involvement
• Community Involvement Plan:  07/88, revised 09/88.
• Open houses and workshops:
• Original Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting:
• Original ROD Fact Sheet:
• Milestone Fact Sheets:  02/90.
• Citizens on site mailing list: 76
• Constituency Interest: Unconcerned
• Site Repository: Webster Parish Public Library
Technical Assistance Grant

• Availability Notice: 03/24/89
• Letters of Intent Received:  None
• Grant Award:  N/A
Fiscal and Program Management
• Remedial Project Manager(s): John Meyer (EPA) 214-665-6742, Mail Code: 6SF-LL
                       M.S. Ramesh (EPA) 214-665-6764, Mail Code:  6SF-LL
                       Bert Gorrod (EPA) 214-665-6779, Mail Code: 6SF-LN
• State Contact: Duane Wilson (LDEQ)
• Community Involvement Coords Melanie Lillard (EPA) 214-665-2294, Mail Code: 6SF-P
• Attorney: Mike Barra (EPA) 214-665-2143, Mail Code 6SF-DL
• EPA Contractor: none
• Prime Contractor:  USACE/ESE/Woodward - Clyde/XT

Cost Recovery:

• PRPs Identified: ARMY
• Viable PRP:  1
• Enforcement Options: Continued oversight; Interagency Agreement; Yellow book procedure
 Present Status and Issues  	—	

 • The Army has added another area into consideration. A draft RI/FS for the Y-Line
 Chromium Etching Facility was submitted 11/94. Comments on the draft are still being discussed
 and require further revision.
 • A Draft RI/FS Workplan for 12 new load/assembly/pack and test areas was submitted in 12/94,
 a revised work plan in 3/95, and a final work plan 11/95.

 Cleanup Measurements	

 • The incineration of wastes and contaminated soils at the Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant
 site has been completed and has reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous substances. The
 Army is conducting investigations, which will lead to further reductions in contaminants, thereby
 protecting the public health and the environment.
 November 29, 1995
                                                     LOUISIANA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT

-------
LINCOLN  CREOSOTE
LOUISIANA
EPA ID# LAD981060429
         REGION 6
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 04
          Bossier Parish
           Bossier City
Site Description
Location:     • The site is located in Bossier City, Bossier Parish, in northwestern Louisiana.
             The site is north of Shed Road, east of Benton Road, south of Montgomery Lane,
             and west of Airline Drive.  Residential neighborhoods border the site to the
             north, northeast, south and west.  Several apartment complexes are located
             immediately north and south of the site.  Portions of the residential
             neighborhoods to the north and northeast and the apartment complex to the
             north make up the area of study for the offsite portion of the site.

Population:    • Bossier City (population 52,721 in 1990)
             • Bossier City, Shreveport and Barksdale Air Force Base form a metropolitan
             area of over 275,000.

Setting:       • The former wood treatment plant encompasses approximately 20 acres.  Lincoln
             Creosote is an abandoned wood treatment facility that was operated from
             approximately 1935 to 1969 by several different owners and operators. The
             amount of the surrounding neighborhood to be included as a part of the site is
             not yet determined.

Hydrology:    • The most shallow ground water at the Lincoln Creosote site occurs within the
             sand and gravel layers of the Red River Alluvium. The water levels at the
             Lincoln Creosote site range from  about 6.0 to 7.5 feet below ground surface.
             However, the ground water is reported to be partially confined below a 20-foot
             thick surficial clay unit and actual depth  to water in the alluvial aquifer may be
             deeper than observed in the onsite monitoring wells. Ground water was shown to
             flow in an easterly direction in the shallow alluvial water-bearing zone.

             • The Lincoln Creosote site is within the Red River Drainage Basin.  The Red
             River is about 0.4 miles west of the site.  The Bossier City Area is drained almost
             entirely by the Red River and its extensive network of small tributaries. The
             tributaries eventually flow into the river to the southeast due to the natural and
             manmade levees along the river. Drainage  is poor and slow due to the flat
             topography.
                                                                    November 29, 1995

-------
Wastes and Volumes —	

• Treatment processes for the plant included the use of creosote, pentachlorophenol (PCP), and
chromated copper arsenate (CCA). The contaminants of concern are the creosote-related
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) or semivolatile organic compounds, PCP, chromium,
copper, and arsenic.
Site Assessment and Ranking
                           NPL USTING HISTORY
                              Site HRS Score: 33.05
                              Proposed Date:  1/18/94
                                  Final Date:
                                NPL Update: No.
Site Map and Diagram
                                        Lincoln Creosote Site
 November 29, 1995
                                                            LINCOLN CREOSOTE

-------
 The  Remediation Process
 Site History:

 • The site is an abandoned wood treatment facility operated from approximately 1935 to 1969 by
 several different owners and operators.
 • From 1935 to 1950, the site was operated by the Lincoln Creosote Co., and from 1950 to 1969
 by the Joslyn Manufacturing and Supply Co. The Koppers Co. owned and dismantled the site
 from 1969 to 1971, but never operated the facility. Since that time, the property has been sold a
 number of times in several parcels to different owners.
 • During site operation, wood products such as railroad ties and utility poles were pressure-
 treated using creosote, CCA and PCP as preservatives.
 • Upon closure of the facility, most buildings, tanks, impoundments and other structures were
 removed.  Former process areas were covered with fill and revegetated.
 • While much of the former facility has remained vacant and undeveloped, a mini-warehouse
 facility and a commercial building have been placed on the northwest portion of the site.
 • In 1985, EPA conducted a site investigation and found high concentrations of creosote-related
 semivolatile compounds in onsite soil samples.
 • A remedial investigation completed by the Joslyn Corp.  with oversight of the Louisiana
 Department of Environmental Quality in 1989, showed significantly elevated concentrations of
 numerous creosote-related semivolatile compounds, PCP, chromium, and arsenic in onsite soils.
 • Remedial activities at the wood treatment site began in  February 1992 under State authority
 and included excavating and disposing of contaminated soils offsite.
 • During  an expanded site investigation conducted by the  EPA in March 1992, high
 concentrations of creosote-related semivolatile  organic compounds were detected in the soil
 samples collected on residential  and commercial properties around the site.
 • The site was proposed for the National Priorities List on January 18,1994. In June 1994 EPA
 began an Expanded Sampling Investigation, Remedial Investigation, and Risk Assessment in the
 neighborhood surrounding the Lincoln Creosote site.  Sampling was completed in late July.  A
 draft report was submitted to EPA in January 1995.
 • An Engineering Evaluation and Cost Analysis (EE/CA)  Approval Memorandum was signed for
 a removal in a portion of the neighborhood surrounding the site on August 23,1994.  This will
 enable EPA and Joslyn Corporation to pursue a possible removal action in one portion of the
 neighborhood".  The EE/CA and  EE/CA Fact Sheet was released to the public on March 23,
 1995. 30-day public comment period ended on April 21,1995.

 Health Considerations:

 • Residents in the study area have been contacted regarding recommendations on potential
 long-term  health risks by the Agency for Toxic Substances  and Disease Registry (ATSDR).

 • Soil samples from some residential properties in the area show elevated levels of PAHs which
 are a group of chemicals formed from the incomplete combustion of coal, oil, and other organic
 substances and are often found in creosote and tar-like substances.

 • Exposure to these chemicals, at the levels found in the area, could cause  a slightly increased
 risk of cancer.
LINCOLN CREOSOTE
                                                                        November 29, 1995

-------
Other Environmental Risks:

• There appears to be no significant environmental or ecological risk from the site as it lies in a
highly urbanized area of Bossier City.
Record of Decision	—
There is no ROD completed to date. An Action Memorandum was completed for the non-time-
critical removal action that addresses soil contamination in off-site areas. Soils in the residential
areas above 3 ppm total carcinogenci PAHs will be excavated and disposed of off-site.  The
residentail areas will be backfilled and restored.
                                           Signed:
                            Action Memo - August 17,1995
Community Involvement	

• Community Involvement Plan:  Developed/implemented September 1994.            '
• Open houses and workshops:  Open houses were held with the community on 1/94, 2/94, 4/94,
6/94,7/94,12/94, 9/95.
• Original Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting: N/A.
• Original ROD Fact Sheet: N/A
• Milestone Fact Sheets: 3/93,1/94, 3/95
• Citizens on site mailing list: 220

• Constituency Interest: People are especially concerned about the health of those residents
who might be exposed to contamination from the site.  Many residents are concerned about the
possible long term effects the site could have on property values.  Upon release of preliminary
residential property sampling results, residents were divided between those relieved that their
property did not appear to be contaminated, and those who were angered that the results were
not positive.
 • Site Repository:

              1.
              2.
Bossier Parish Library
2206 Beckett Street
Bossier City, Louisiana 71111
318/746-1693

Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality
7290 Bluebonnet
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
504/765-0487
 November 29, 1995
                                                                       LINCOLN CREOSOTE

-------
             3.     Environmental Protection Agency
                    Region 6
                    1445 Ross Avenue
                    Dallas, Texas 75202
                    214/665-6444
Technical Assistance  Grant
  Availability Notice: January 1994
  Letters of Intent Received:  None
  Final Application Received:
  Grant Award:
  Current Status:
Fiscal and Program Management
  Remedial Project Manager (epa): John Meyer, 214-665-6742, Mail Code:  6SF-LL
  State Contact:  Todd Thibodeaux (LDEQ)
  Community Involvement Coordinator (EPA): Melanie Lillard, 214-665-2294, Mail Code: 6SF-P
  Attorney (EPA): Jim CosteUo, 214-665-8045, Mail Code:  6SF-DL
  State Coordinator (EPA): Marilyn Owen, 214-665-8508, Mail Code: 6SF-LL
  EPA Prime Contractor:  Roy F. Weston
  PRP Prime Contractor:  ERM - Southwest

Cost Recovery:

• PRPs Identified:  4
• Viable PRP: 1
Present Status and  Issues
• During the operation of the now-abandoned facility, waste water from the wood-treating
process was discharged from the Lincoln Creosote facility into the natural drainage pathways
surrounding the facility.  It is suspected that the waste water included wood-treating wastes and
other organic and metal  contaminants associated with the wood-treating process.
• Review of historical drainage pathways around the facility during its period of operation
indicates that releases of waste water would have flowed to the northeast/east, away from the site
into drainage ditches that are now located in a developed residential area.
• The undeveloped portion of the former facility property is fenced to restrict access.
• Large residential neighborhoods border the Lincoln Creosote facility to the north, northeast,
south and west.
• A U.S.  Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) apartment complex is located
immediately north of the facility, and another apartment complex is located to the south. Areas
of commercial development are present to the east and west. Areas to the south are separated
by a railroad line.
LINCOLN CREOSOTE
November 29, 1995

-------
• A removal action for one area of the residential neighborhood will be addressed through an
administrative order with the PRPs. PRPs have been sent special notice letters for the
performance of the non-time-critical removal action.  A good faith offer was received from the
PRPs on 11/1/94. An EE/CA Fact Sheet summarizing a proposed non-time-critical removal
action was issued 3/23/95.  An EPA Action Memo was completed in August 1995.
• An Administrative Order on Consent was signed by Joslyn Corporation on October 31,1995
for implementation of the non-time critical removal action.  Implementation of the soil removal
activities in the off-site areas is expected to start in January 1996.
Cleanup Measurements  	—	

• Cleanup level for PAHs in a residential scenario of 3.0 ppm total carcinogenic PAHs for the
first two feet of depth. The cleanup level for a utility worker scenario from 2 feet in depth to 5
feet in depth of 250 ppm total carcinogenic PAHs.
 November 29. 1995
                                                                      LINCOLN CREOSOTE

-------
OLD INGER
REFINERY
LOUISIANA
EPA ID# LAD98074553
      EPA REGION 6
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 03
         Ascension Parish
                                                           Other Mamas:
                                                            Darrow Oil
Site Description
Location:     • Between Highway 75 and the Mississippi River, Ascension Parish, midway
            between Baton Rouge and New Orleans.
            • 4.5 miles north of Darrow.

Population:   • 19,500 people live within 10 miles of site.

Setting:      • Rural, adjacent to the Mississippi River levee.
            • Nearest residence is 0.3 miles south of the site.
            • Nearest drinking water well is 0.5 miles south of the site.
            • Area is generally flat and subject to water-ponding during heavy rains.

Hydrology:   • The site soil profile consists predominantly of silty and sandy clays, silts, and
            fine sands to a depth of about 115-to-125 feet.
            • Ground water is encountered generally at a depth of 6-to-12 feet and rises to
            within a few feet of the ground surface.
            • The horizontal ground water gradient is thought to vary during the year, but
            generally is anticipated to be  away from the Mississippi River and to be less than
            one foot per year.
            • The vertical gradient varies during the year, but is generally downward, away
            from the River, and is estimated to be fairly steep during average Mississippi
            River flow conditions.
Wastes and Volumes  	

1.  Principle Pollutants:

      • Polynuclear aromatic compounds (ex; 49,000 ppb phenanthrene in sediment).
      • Heavy metals (ex; 130 ppm zinc - sediment).
                                                                 November 29, 1995

-------
Site Assessment and Ranking
                             NPL LISTING HISTORY
                                 Site HRS Score: 48.98
                              ,  Proposed Date: 13/30/82
                                  Final Date: 9/8/83
                                NPL Update: No. Original
Site Map and Diagram
                                     Baton Rouge
                      Ascension Parish
      Old Inger
A — Bloremedtatlon Unit
B « Buried Waste Area
C « Stockpiled Waste Area
D « Tank Area
                              G = Surface Im
The Remediation Process	

SHe History:

• 1967 - began operations as an oil refinery.
• 1976 - site was obtained by Old Inger Oil Refinery for use as an oil reclamation plant for
refinery waste; waste oil brought to the site by barge and by truck.
• 1978 - large spill occurred and the site was sold shortly thereafter.
• 1980 - site was abandoned.
• April 1983 - August 1988, five emergency removal actions were conducted to stabilize the site
to include: site security, migration control, excavation and containment of consolidated soils,
sampling and analysis.
 November 29,1995
                                                             OLD INGER OIL REFINERY

-------
Health Considerations:

• Ground water in area used for drinking.
• Surface water used for irrigation.

Other Environmental Risks:

• Ground water and soil are contaminated to a depth of 40 feet and 6 feet, respectively, -by
organic chemicals.
Record of Decision
                                  Signed: September 25,1984
Remedy:

• On-site land treatment of contaminated soils and sludge Treatment will include synthetic liner
(per 10-29-87 HQ decision).
• Close and seal an ungrouted on-site well.
• Pump and treat shallow ground water via carbon absorption.
• Carbon adsorption treatment and discharge offsite of contaminated surface waters on-site.
• In-situ containment and capping of slightly contaminated soils & sludge.
  Other Remedies Considered

1.     Deep well disposal of
       contaminated fluids
2.     Offsite disposal
3.     On-sHe landfill
4.     No action
Community Involvement 	
Outreach activities: Responsibility of LDEQ
  Community Involvement Plan: Developed 11/82; Revised 4/85, 4/90.
  Open houses and workshops:  01/90, Video 11/90
  Original Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting: 6/84
  Original ROD Fact Sheet:  10/84
  Milestone Fact Sheets: 4/85,12/88, 10/89
  Citizens on site mailing list:  65
  Constituency Interest:  Most complaints are about odors
           Reason Not Chosen
Cost
Cost; non-permanent remedy
Possibility of major release If levee falls
Poses threat to public health and the
environment
  Site Repository: Ascension Parish Library - Gonzales.
OLD INGER OIL REFINERY
                         November 29, 1995

-------
Technical Assistance Grant
  Availability Notice:  / /
  Letters of Intent Received:
      1) 6/18/88 from Ascension Superfund Koalition (ASK).
  Final Application Received:
  Grant Award: 7/90.
  Current Status:
Fiscal and Program Management
                     Remedial Project Manager:  Mark Hansen
                     State Contact:  Tim Knight
                     Community Involvement Coordinator:  Melanie Ontiveros Lillard
                     Attorney: Keith Smith
                     State Coordinator: Marilyn Owen
                     Prime Contractor:  State Contractor - IT Corp. -(design and oversight)
                                      Westinghouse Haztech, Inc. (construction)
Cost Recovery. State (LDEQ) Lead (Enforcement)

• PRPs Identified:  17
• Viable PRP: None
• Enforcement options: None
 Present Status and  Issues	
 • Site had been on hold while resolving land ban issues with Headquarters.  On October 29,
 1987,'Headquarters submitted an approval with revisions to the original design. LDEQ
 Cooperative Agreement amendment in the amount of $340,000, for addition of liner, expanded
 ground water study, and associated engineering. Awarded June 1988.  Additional RA funds of
 $1,646,308 awarded to LDEQ on September 29,1989.
 • RA contract for construction of the land treatment unit advertised July 19,1989. Bids opened
 August 29th. Contract awarded 9/29/89.
 • Supplemental ground water study began March 1990 under IAG with USAGE.
 • LDEQ is finalizing bid documents for operation of the Land Treatment Unit, which is
 expected to be advertised in the Fall of 1995.
 Cleanup Measurements  	—	

 The immediate actions taken to reduce the contamination in the pits and lagoons and to limit
 site access have reduced the potential for contact with site contamination and the further spread
 of contaminated materials. These initial cleanup actions have made the Old Inger Oil Refinery
 site safer while long-term cleanup activities proceed.
 November 29, 1995
                                                                OLD INGER OIL REFINERY

-------
 PAB OIL  &  C
 SERVICE,  IN
 LOUISIANA
 EPA ID# LAD980749139
 EPA REGION 6
GRESSIONAL DISTRICT 07
    Vermilion Parish
Site Description
Location:     • Vermilion Parish in Southern Louisiana.
             • Site is located three miles north of Abbeville along Highway 167.

Population:    • 13,000 in Abbeville (nearest town).
             • 50,000 in Vermilion Parish.

Setting:       • Primary land use in the vicinity of the site is agricultural and residential.
             • Three Abbeville city wells located within three miles of the site provide water
             for 18,000 people.
             • Private wells within three miles of the site serve another 2,100 people.
             • Facility used for disposal of oil based drilling muds and other oil field related
             wastes.
             • Located on a 21-acre plot of land and consists of three disposal pits and four
             steel holding tanks.
             • Site pits cover an area of approximately 300 feet by 360 feet.

Hydrology:    • Underlying the site is a series of over-consolidated clays and sands.
             • Major aquifer underlying the site is the Chicot aquifer.
             • Normal ground water flow is west/northwest.
Wastes and Volumes
            • Contaminants detected in the pit sludges include barium, chromium, lead,
            manganese, ethylbenzene, acetone, toluene and xylene, PAHs.
            • 30,000 cubic yards soils and sludges
            • 10,000,000 gallons of surface water
                                                                  November 29, 1995

-------
Site Assessment and Ranking
                          NPL LISTING HISTORY
                              Site HRS Score; 38.94
                             Proposed Date: 6/24/88
                               Final Date: 3/31/89
                               NPL Update: No. 7 ^^
Site Map and Diagram
                                                                 e s
                                                                •as
                                                                 if 3.
                                                                 §i«a

                                                                 II
                                                                  iS.
                                              PAB Oil Site
if
                                                        N
                                                       A
                                 Vermilion Parish, Louisiana
 The Remediation Process
 SH* History.
 • Property is owned by Edmond Mouton estate.
 • Operated as a disposal facility for oil field waste from 1979 until 1982 by a lease agreement
 with PAB Oil and Chemical Services, Inc.
 • Citizens' complaints of site operations in 1980 led to EPA investigations of the site.
 • In November 1982, the State ordered the site properly dosed.
 • The company claimed it had no money for closure.
 • October 1991 - Potentially Responsible Party (PRP), with EPA oversight, addressed a possibly
 dangerous problem with a damaged storage tank.
 November 29, 1995
                                                    PAB OIL & CHEMICAL SERVICE, INC.

-------
Health Considerations:

• Site is located over the Chicot Aquifer, which is a major source of drinking water.

Other Environmental Risks:

• High rainfall and short distances to surface water create the potential for contaminants to
migrate offsite to Coulee Kenny Irrigation Canal; thence, to the Vermillion River.
• The site is unfenced and creates a potential for direct contact.
Record of Decision
                                  Signed: September 22,1993
• Selected remedy consists of bioremediation then stabilization of pits sludges, surface water
treatment and disposal, and ground water monitoring.
  Other Remedies Considered

1. Stabilization
2. Incineration

Community Involvement
           Reason Not Chosen
Will not address organics
Not cost effective
• Community Involvement Plan: Developed 11/90.
• Open houses and workshops: Fact sheet, Press clips 5/90, 9/90 (S.I.T.E. Demo); Open house
9/90; Responsiveness Summary (S.I.T.E. Demo) 2/91; Superfund "101" Workshop, Press clips
2/91. Letters to local officials and citizens 4/91. Fact sheet 4/91, 12/92 Open House
• Original Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting: 04/93.
• Original ROD Fact Sheet:  10/93
• Milestone Fact Sheets: 12/92

• Citizens on site mailing list:  337

• Constituency Interest:  Potential contamination of surface and ground water

• Site Repository: Vermilion Parish Library, Abbeville, Louisiana


Technical Assistance Grant	
• Availability Notice: 08/04/89
• Letters of Intent Received:
       1) Received 8/29/89 from V.A.P.E.
• Grant Award:  09/27/90
• Current Status:  Technical Advisor, Wilma Subra, Subra Company
PAB OIL & CHEMICAL SERVICE, INC.
                         November 29, 1995

-------
Fiscal and Program Management
• Remedial Project Manager (EPA):  M. S. Ramesh, 214/665-6764, Mail Sta. 6SF-AO
• State Contact: Todd Thibideaux
• Community Involvement Coordinator (EPA): Melanie Liliard, 214/665-2294, Mail Sta. 6SF-P
• Attorney (EPA):  Keith Smith, 214/665-2157, Mail Sta. 6SF-DL
• State Coordinator (EPA): Marilyn Owen, 214/665-8508, Mail Sta. 6SF-LL
• Prime Contractor:  Sverdrup Corporation

Cost Recovery:
• PRPs Identified: 106
• Viable PRP: About 50

• Enforcement:
      1.     General Notice/104(e) letters issued 8/89.
      2.     Special Notice Letters issued 12/89
      3.     PRPs did not conduct RI/FS. EPA conducted RI/FS using fund money.
      4.     PRPs did agree to conduct emergency removal under an AOC. Effect on
             Remedial work is unchanged.
      5.     Pre-Referral Negotiation package 4/93.
      6.     RD/RA Special Notice letters sent January 1994.
      7.     Good Faith Offer received March 18,1994 rejected by EPA.
      8.     Unilateral RD/RA Administrative Order issued 9-27-94.
Present Status and  Issues 	—	

• A PRP group has agreed to conduct RD/RA and the remedial design is in progress. Remedial
design is expected to be complete by the end of 1996 and the remedial action by the end of 1999.
• EPA is negotiating a de minimis settlement with several small contributing PRPs.
Cleanup Measurements
• Over 27,00 cubic yards of waste and 10,000,000 gallons of surface water will be treated at the
site.
• Remediation of this site will reduce environmental risk for over 15,000 people within a four
mile radius of the site.
• The off-site treatment and disposal of all wastes contained in the four on-site disposal storage
tanks reduced the threat to off-site drainage systems and residents.
 November 29, 1995
                                                         PAB OIL & CHEMICAL SERVICE, INC.

-------
PETRO-PROC
OF LOUISIAN
LOUISIANA
EPA ID# LAD057482713
Site  Description
        REGION 6
ONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 04
     East Baton Rouge Parish
Location:     •  The Petro Processors Inc. site consists ot two locations near Scotlandville, East Baton
              Rouge Parish, Louisiana, about ten miles north of the City of Baton Rouge.
              •  The Scenic Highway Site is located just west of US Highway 61 and north of the
              intersection of Scenic Highway 964 and US Highway 61.
              •  The Brooklawn Site is located about 2 miles west, southwest of the Scenic Site.

Population:    •  The community is predominantly rural with a few houses located about 800 to 1000
              feet from the border of Scenic Highway.

Setting:       •  Nearest residence is about 3,000 feet from the site.
              •  Nearest drinking water well is 3,000 ft. upgradient of the site.
              •  The Petro Processors site is comprised of two former petrochemical disposal areas
              situated about 15 miles apart: the Scenic Highway and Brooklawn areas, totalling 77 ac.
              •  Brooklawn is the larger of the two areas, currently estimated at 60 acres. Bayou Baton
              Rouge meanders around both Scenic and Brooklawn and fingers out into Devil's Swamp.
              •  Bayou Baton Rouge historically ran through both Brooklawn and Scenic, but was
              rerouted during remdial activies  at each site.
              •  Most of the Brooklawn area was covered by a soil cap, seeded, and contoured to
              control erosion. In 1994, a full scale treatment facility was constructed to treat
              contaminated groundwater and non-aqueaous phase liquids (NAPLs) recovered.
              Approximately 98 sumps have been placed and are in operation at the Brooklawn Site.
              Recovery wells in operation total about 136, with about 163 wells installed of 214 planned.
              •  Brooklawn still has one disposal pond which remains partially open ("Lower Lagoon")
              where drill cuttings are deposited; all other pits and two former ponds ("Upper Lagoon"
              and "Cypress Swamp") have been filled and covered.
              •  The Scenic Site is now covered by a soil cap, seeded, and contoured to control erosion.
              Recovery wells have not yet been placed to contain the shallow groundwater, but a system
              similar to that employed at Brooklawn is being designed.  Although phase separation
              modules would be installed, contaminated water may be pipelined to Brooklawn for
              treatment and NAPLs shipped over a non-public road connecting Brooklawn and Scenic.

Hydrology:    •  Portions of both sites are on the Bayou Baton Rouge flood plain.
              •  The bayou flood plain at Brooklawn is also on the Mississippi River flood plain; the
              Mississippi flood plain immediately south of Brooklawn (Devil's Swamp)  is a Wetlands.
              •  Pleistocene terrace deposits are predominately clays, while alluvium deposits are
              interlayered silty clays and sandy silts.
              •  The shallow ground water regime is referred to as -  40 MSL zone.  The deep
              groundwater regime of concern is the "400-foot sand".
              •  Receptor analysis modeling has  been conducted (and is constantly updated with new
              information obtained from recovery well installation) to protect the "400-foot sand".
                                                                           November 29, 1995

-------
Wastes and Volumes —	

• The site's principle pollutants are petrochemical wastes including the following:

            - Chlorinated Hydrocarbons (Hexachlorobutadiene is predominant contaminant)
            - Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
            - Heavy Metals
            - Oils
Site Assessment and Ranking
                            NPL LISTING HISTORY
                                Site HRS Score; 41.44
                                Proposed Date: 9/8/83
                                 FinaJ Date: 9/81/94
                              :.   NPL Update: No. 1
Site Map and Diagram
                •To
                 Mississippi
                 River
                                                  Area #1 - Scenic
                                                  Highway Site
               Area #2.
               Brooklawn Site
 November 29. 1995
                                                PETRO-PROCESSORS OF LOUISIANA, INC.

-------
The Remediation Process
SHe History:

•  The Scenic Highway Site originated as a borrow pit used for petrochemical waste disposal
from 1961-1974.  Brooklawn was opened in 1969 to accept petrochemical wastes since the Scenic
area was filled to capacity.
•  Although filled and closed in 1974, the potential for leachate migration and erosion of the
Scenic pit was of concern due to the hazardous constituents contained in the pit. Operations at
Brooklawn ceased in 1980, but ponds were left open to the elements.
•  In July 1980, the U.S. Department of Justice, the State of Louisiana, the City of Baton
Rouge, and the Parish of East Baton Rouge filed suite against PPI and several generators which
had materials transported to PPI.  A Consent Decree for site closure was eventually developed
with the participation of all parties and court and was entered into the Federal Court's record on
February 16, 1984.
•  The Consent Decree required the Defendants to investigate, design and implement a
conceptual remedial action specified in the Consent Decree.  The conceptual  remedy generally
called for the excavation and solidification of all visible contamination at the site and subsequent
placement into an onsite landfill with an "appropriate" liner and leachate collection system.
Additional elements included the solidification, incineration, or off-site disposal of all
nonaqueous phase wastes within the lagoons. In addition, recovery wells were to be installed and
operated in those areas where free phase organic liquids are present.
•  Shortly after the entering of the Consent Decree, the  Industry Defendants  (through a
company they set up  known as NPC Services, Inc.) prepared workplans, conducted investigations,
and prepared a Remedial Design and Construction Plan  which detailed site remediation
activities.  Unfortunately, during the early phases of construction (late 1987) NPC's air
monitoring program detected the release of volatile hazardous substances from the Brooklawn
site. NPC determined that vapor emissions were, or could be, generated from several sources.
•  NPC subsequently reported in a Supplemental Remedial Action Plan ("SRAP") dated
December 1988 that  "After a thorough study of the causes and effects of these releases it was
determined that  remediation could not continue under the approved plan without causing further
releases".  Under the terms of the Consent Decree, NPC was then required to examine alternate
methods of remediation.  The SRAP presents NPC's evaluation of alternate remediation
methods.
•  The various alternatives investigated by NPC included (1) modification of original closure
plan by modifying excavation techniques and deploying typical emission source controls such as
foams, water  sprays, visqueen and soil covers, (2) in-situ  volatilization, (3) bioremediation, (4)
incineration, (5)  solvent extraction, (6) in-situ solidification and capping,  (7) vapor containment
structures and (8) hydraulic containment and recovery. NPC determined that hydraulic recovery
and containment was the only technology that could be safely employed at the present time due
primarily to the potential for vapor emissions problems caused by implementation of the other
technologies.
•  Upon review, EPA Region 6 rejected the SRAP because it did not contain a sufficiently
rigorous evaluation of the alternate technologies.  EPA subsequently embarked upon its own
review of possible alternative remediation technologies.  Upon completion of its eighteen month
long study, EPA concluded that two other technologies in addition to hydraulic containment and
recovery had merit.  These two alternatives included air/steam stripping and in-situ soil flushing.
However, EPA recognized that these technologies needed to be bench-scale and pilot tested
before EPA could argue their merit to a Federal Judge.
PETRO-PROCESSORS OF LOUISIANA, INC.
November 29, 1995

-------
•  The Federal Judge recognized EPA's concern and ordered Louisiana State University (LSU)
to conduct research on the applicability of alternate technologies and to act as his expert witness.
to resolve technical disputes between the Industry Defendants and EPA.  LSU has almost
completed their fifth year of research (10/30/95).
•  The end result of all the discussions between EPA, the State of Louisiana and the Federal
Court, was an amended Consent Decree in 1989 which specified the implementation of hydraulic
containment and recovery. NPC subsequently began additional investigation, design and
construction activities necessary to implement the new remedy.
Haalth Considerations:

•  Spontaneous ignition of the waste resulted in fires in the upper lagoon on several occasions.
•  In 1969, a spill from the lagoons contaminated portions of a nearby ranch and 30 cattle were
killed.
•  Site is located over the "400-foot sands", a major drinking water aquifer.

Oth«r Environmental Risks:

•  Lagoons are in the Mississippi River flood plain.
•  Bayou Baton Rouge flows by both sites and fingers into Devil's Swamp, a Wetlands area
immediately south of Brooklawn.  This area is used recreationally for hunting and fishing.
Currently a State health advisory covers a portion of Devil's Swamp.
Record of Decision
                                  Signed: Consent Decree 1984
                                 Amended: Consent Deere 1989

•  The existing 1984 Consent Decree and 1989 Amendment may be considered a Source Control
and Groundwater Containment Remedial Action for the Petro Processors Site.

•  The SRAP, incorporated by reference into the Consent Decree, calls for a system of about
200 recovery and containment wells at the Brooklawn Site, following capping of the
contaminated lagoons. A similar system is being designed for Scenic and will be presented to
EPA for review and approval in early 1996.
Community Involvement  	

• Community Involvement Plan:  Developed 10/84, revised 01/88, and again revised 03/91.
• Open houses and workshops: 7/90,1/91, 3/94, 7/94
• Original Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting: N/A
• Original ROD Fact Sheet: N/A.
• Milestone Fact Sheets: 07/87 press release; update 02/89;  10/89, 06/90, 02/91, 3/91.
• Citizens on site mailing list: 112
• Constituency Interest: Concerned. Odors, contamination  of air, surface and ground water,
PRP oversight.
• Site Repository:  Alsen Community Center.
 November 29, 1995
PETRO-PROCESSORS OF LOUISIANA, INC.

-------
Technical Assistance Grant
  Availability Notice: None
  Letters of Intent Received:
       1) 9/18/90 - Coalition for Community Action;
       2) LOI notice published 10/14/90.
  Final Application Received: 01/23/91
  Grant Award: 09/05/91
  Current Status:
Fiscal and Program Management
  Remedial Project Manager (EPA): Cynthia Kaleri, 214-665-6772, Mail Code: 6SF-LL
  State Contact:  Tim Knight (LDEQ)
  Community Involvement Coordinator (EPA): Melanie Lillard, 214-665-2294, Mail Code: 6SF-P
  Attorney (EPA): Jon Weisberg, 214-665-2180, Mail Code: 6SF-DL
  State Coordinator (EPA): Mark Satterwhite, 214-665-8505, Mail Code: 6SF-LN
  Prime Contractor:  DPRA - Enforcement Support, EPA
                NPC, Inc. - PRPs' Remedial Company

Cost Recovery:

• PRPs Identified: 11
• Viable PRP: Petro Processors of Louisiana, Inc.; U.S. Steel Corp.; Copolymer Rubber and
Chemical Corp.; Uniroyal, Inc.; Ethyl Corp.; Dow Chemical Co.; Shell Oil Company, American
Hoechst Corp.; Exxon Corp.; Exxon Chemical Co.; Allied Chemical Corp.; Rubicon Chemicals
Corporation.
• The federal judge presiding over this case would not allow cost recovery for oversight of the
Consent Decree implementation; past costs expended prior to the Consent Decree were allowed
(total equal to $600,000 per Section 26 if the Consent Decree).  Consent Decree entered into the
Record on February 17, 1984.
Present Status and Issues
•  The existing 1984 Consent Decree and 1989 Amendment may be considered a Source Control
and Groundwater Containment Remedial Action for the Petro Processors Site. Site boundaries
are well defined by the Remedial Planning Activities Report, incorporated by reference into the
Consent Decree.
•  An air emissions risk assessment was conducted utilizing historical data, data obtained before
the caps were in place. Excess risks calculated were within or less than the risk range established
in the NCP for remedial actions at Superfund sites.
•  All contaminated source areas at both sites, except the lower lagoon at Brooklawn, are
capped. About 98 sumps and 136 wells are currently operational for containment and recovery
of NAPLs at Brooklawn (163 wells installed of 214 planned).. A similar recovery well system for ,
the Scenic Highway Site is currently being developed.
PETRO-PROCESSORS OF LOUISIANA, INC.
November 29, 1995

-------
•  A full scale treatment facility has been constructed at the Brooklawn location to manage
contaminated groundwater and organics currently being recovered from Brooklawn and that
planned to be recovered from Scenic.  The treatment scheme includes the following: 1) Phase
separate water and organics; 2)  air strip contaminated water; 3) incinerate fumes from air
strippers  and incinerate organic liquids from phase separation unit; 4) polish treated water via
carbon adsorption; and 5)  discharge the water under an NPDES permit.
•  A trial burn (agency oversight testing of the liquid mode operation of the incinerator) was
completed the week of November 7,1994 and the facility became fully operational. Testing data
for the incinerator, liquid mode, is being reviewed currently to determine final operating
specifications for the incinerator. The incinerator is currently operating under interim
specifications determined from preliminary data obtained during the trial burn.
•  Indirect risk assessments have been completed for the incinerator  fume mode (utilizing data
from the compliance test, fume mode  testing), and for the incinerator liquid mode (utilizing data
from the trial burn, liquid mode testing) at the Petro Site. These assessments are being reviewed
by EPA staff currently and final operational specifications should be approved early in  1996.
•  With operation of the new facility,  plans were also approved for closing out the upper and
lower lagoons. A specification for closure of the upper lagoon was approved by EPA on October
14,1994 and this lagoon is now closed. The  lower lagoon will remain partially open to allow
disposal of drill cuttings from  recovery well installation.
Cleanup Measurements	

• Construction of some phases of the remedy, such as the engineered clay fills covering the
Brooklawn and Scenic sites, the installation of a trench drain system in Cypress Swamp and
recovery wells at Brooklawn, have been completed. These measures have helped to reduce the
migration of contaminants and prevent air emissions from the source areas. With operation of
the full scale treatment facility, wells can now be added at Scenic to complete the hydraulic
containment / NAPL recovery remedy.
 November 29. 1995
                                                      RETRO-PROCESSORS OF LOUISIANA, INC.

-------
SOUTHERN
SHIPBUILDI
LOUISIANA
EPA ID# LAD008148015
                                    EPA REGION 6
                                  NGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 01
                                      St. Tammany Parish
                                         Near Slidell
Site Description
Location:
Population:

Setting:
Hydrology:
The site is at the location of the former Southern Shipbuilding
Corporation, a barge cleaning, building, docking and repair facility, within
St. Tammany Parish, Slidell, Louisiana.
The site is located on 54 acres at 999 Canulette Road, just down stream of
the U.S. Highway 433 bridge and adjacent to Bayou Bonfouca,
approximately 1.5 miles downstream of the Bayou Bonfouca Superfund
site.

Approximately 26,000 residents live in the surrounding community.

Nearest residence potentially impacted by the site is approximately 400
feet from the site, to the southwest.
Nearest drinking water well is approximately 1/4 mile southwest of the site.
The southeast portion of the site is heavily wooded.
The site is bordered on the north and east by Bayou Bonfouca, on the
south by Canulette Road and on the west by Bonfouca Road .
The contaminants have been found in the bayou.

A uniform clay layer was found to underlie the impoundments and most of
the site.
A contaminated saturated zone exists above the clay layer and ground
water movement is toward the bayou in a northwest direction.
Another water bearing unit referred to as the upper confined aquifer,
which has not been contaminated by the impoundments, was found below
the clay and flows to the south.
Wastes and Volumes
 •     PITS- 35,000 cubic yards of highly contaminated (PAH's) sludges are in several pits and
       lagoons comprising about 3 acres.
              »
 •     GRAVING DOCK- Sediment contains tri-butyl-tin (estimated 3,000 cubic yards) from
       decades of hull repair.
                                                                 November 29, 1995

-------
•     PROPERTY- The facility comprises 53 acres with a wide variety of hot spots including:
      explosive/volatile paints, soils contaminated with high levels of metal contaminants such
      as lead and copper, PCB contaminated soils.

•     BAYOU- contamination from pits and graving dock have been released into the bayou.

Site Assessment and Ranking  	r—
                            NPL LISTING HISTORY
                                Site HRS Score; 50.00
                                Proposed Date: 2/13/95
                                  Final Date: 5/26/95
                                 NPL Update: No. 1S
Site Map and Diagram
                                     Southern
                                     Shipbuildin
                                     Corporal
The Remediation Process  	

Sit* History:

•     A shipbuilding plant began operating at the site in 1919 under the direction of Canulette
      Shipbuilding. In 1954, Canulette Shipbuilding sold the business to J & S Shipbuilding.
      Records of the site operations by either of these companies is unavailable.
November 29,1995
SOUTHERN SHIPBUILDING

-------
•      In 1957, Southern Shipbuilding Corporation purchased the property from J & S
       Shipbuilding. Southern Shipbuilding Corporation ran the facility from 1957 until 1993,
       during which time it performed gas freeing, building, docking and repairing operations.

•      The results of EPA's and LDEQ's investigative efforts in late 1992 and early 1993
       provided evidence that the site posed significant human health and environmental  threat.

•      During the summers of 1993 and 1994, EPA conducted emergency removal actions to
       provide additional freeboard within the surface impoundments.

•      The removal actions consisted of pumping contaminated water from the surface
       impoundments, treating it through sand and activated carbon filtration and discharging
       the treated water to Bayou Bonfouca.

•      In February 1995, sheet piling was driven along the edge of the waterway to prevent
       catastrophic failure of the existing levee.

•      In April 1995, a removal action took place which consisted of offsite disposal of
       numerous containers of paints, solvents and other chemicals from the building referred to
       as the "paint shed".

.•      The investigations showed four types of contamination concerns remaining at the site:

         1)   Slightly  contaminated surface and subsurface soil in proximity of the
              impoundments area extending from the surface down to about 10 feet;

         2)   Highly contaminated sludges and soils of the impoundments and over flow areas,
              and soils in close proximity to these areas;

         3)   Sediments within and immediately near the graving dock (dry dock); and

         4)   Slight contamination in sediments of Bayou Bonfouca.

 Health Considerations:

 •     The pits and hot spots at this site all contain highly toxic materials.  The property  is not
       safe for human habitation nor is it usable in current state for commercial enterprise.
       Human health  threats also exist for recreation al users of the Bayou.

 •     Flooding has occurred in the area and residents along the Bayou have complained that
       contaminants from the site have been deposited on their residential properties.

 Other Environmental Risks:

 •      Sediments in and around the graving dock are contaminated with tributyltin (TBT),  an
        anti-fouling paint additive, and an extremely powerful toxin.

 •      Catastrophic failure of the levees have occurred releasing pit contaminants into the
        Bayou
 SOUTHERN SHIPBUILDING
                                                                          November 29, 1995

-------
 Record of Decision
                                    Signed: July 20,1995
  The Southern Shipbuilding Superfund site remedy includes:

       Offsite incineration of site pit wastes (at nearby Bayou Bonfouca site)
       Consolidation/capping of soils onsite not addressed by incineration
       Consolidation/capping of incinerator ash onsite
       Removal and incineration of tributyltin-contaminated sediments from the graving dock
Community Involvement
  Community Involvement Plan: Developed 01/95
  Open houses and workshops: 08/94,12/94, 02/95, 02/95
  Community Meetings: 12/94, 01/95, 02/95, 04/95
  Original Proposed Plan Fact Sheet and Public Meeting: 03/95
  Original ROD Fact Sheet:  7/31/95
  Milestone Fact Sheets: Update 07/94, 09/94
  Citizens on site mailing list: 253
  Constituency Interest: High interest at site.
  Site Repository:  St. Tammany Parish Library, Slidell Branch, Slidell, Louisiana
Technical Assistance Grant
  Availability Notice: 01/95, 02/95
  Letters of Intent Received:       Slidell Working Against Major Pollution (SWAMP), 02/95;
                                Earth Beautiful Foundation, 02/95
  Draft Application Received: 5/95
  Final Application Received: 10/95
  Grant Award: Pending
Fiscal and Program Management
  Remedial Project Manager (EPA):  Mark Hansen, 214-665-7548, Mail Code:  6SF-L
  State Contact:  Duane Wilson (LDEQ)
  Community Involvement Coordinator: Melanie Lillard, 214-665-2294, Mail Code: 6SF-P
  Attorney (EPA): John Dugdale, 214-665-8027, Mail Code: 6SF-DL
  State Coordinator (EPA): Marilyn Owen , 214-665-8508, Mail Code: 6SF-LL
  Prime Contractor:  CH2MHJU
November 29, 1995
SOUTHERN SHIPBUILDING

-------
Cost Recovery:

• PRPs Identified:  1
• Viable PRP: 0

Present Status and Issues
•      1995 marked the culmination of EPA's accelerate/integrated efforts;

             February site proposed to NPL

             March RI/FS/EECA completed, Proposed Plan for Pits issued

             April Removal Action initiated to complete assessment of site; remove hot spots.


             May Public comment period ended after 68 days and 4 community meetings,
             letter recommending final NPL placement  from Governor Edwards received, site
             finalized on NPL.

             July Record of Decision Signed, Remedial  Design completed, Remedial Action
             initiated with signing of LAG^with USAGE, of incineration of the Southern
             Shipbuilding waste at the Bayou Bonfouca  incinerator ended May 19, 1995.

             August USAGE contractors mobilize

             September excavation of wastes begin, shakedown bum initiated

Cleanup  Measurements   	
EPA's actions at the Southern Shipbuilding have demonstrated outstanding productivity,
management skill, and creativity to solve a major pollution problem in concert with the City of
Slidell, Louisiana. By integrating all internal and external aspects of the program, the quality and
speed promised in the agency's Administrative Improvements concepts were fully demonstrated.
The creative approach utilized at this site serves as an example of the kinds of improvements that
can be made in Superfund nationwide.

In an 18 month period (January, 1994 to July, 1995) the Southern Shipbuilding Team succeeded
in achieved as much progress as is normally accomplished by EPA in 10 years.  During this
period:

  •    A Community Advisory Group was formed:  More than a dozen formal and informal
       meetings with concerned citizens and elected officials were held to shape site studies and
       remedy selection. In addition to a Technical Assistance Grant group, community
       associations and a Community Advisory Group were actively involved. The approach
       created mutual trust and the concept that EPA is a partner in solving community
       environmental problems.  A striking measure of this community involvement is that an
       incineration remedy in the middle of the City received majority support from residents
       (and a unanimous endorsement by the City Council).
SOUTHERN SHIPBUILDING
November 29, 1995

-------
      Accelerated the Superfimd process with no decrease in quality of work products:  In a
      period of 18 months, EPA:

             completed 3 stabilizing Removal Actions,

             completed National Priorities List Site (NPL) evaluation (proposed February
             1995, added to the NPL after receiving the endorsement of the Governor of
             Louisiana in June 1995),

             completed a full evaluation of over 3,000 potential responsible parties (e.g. barge
             cleaning customers),

             completed a total technical characterization of barge cleaning sludge lagoons
             including: full human health and ecological risk assessment, full Remedial
             Investigation, pilot tests of biological treatment and incineration, and evaluation
             of the technical feasibility of 10 remedial options,

             completed formal remedy selection processes from the proposal of remedy in
             March, 1995 through'a 60 day comment period with public meetings, to the
             signing of a Record of Decision on July 21,

             completed negotiations and received a signed Superfund State Contract on July
             28,

             completed initial remedial design specifications, and

             initiated Remedial Action under a July 28 interagency agreement with the U.S.
             Army Corps of Engineers.
November 29,1995
                                                                  'SOUTHERN SHIPBUILDING

-------