UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                                  WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
                                      JAN '   4 1999
                                                                                OFFICE OF
                                                                            ENFORCEMENTAND
                                                                          COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
 Dear NPDES Permit Holder:                                i

 Thank you for participating in the 1998 Discharge Monitoring Report - Quality Assurance (DMR-QA)
 Study 18. This program covers all major and selected minor permittees within the National Pollutant
 Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The United States Environmental Protection Agency's
 (USEPA) evaluation of your results is enclosed. Please provide a copy of the enclosed
 performance evaluation report to any laboratory which performed analyses for you.
 In the enclosed report, each result you reported has been placed in one of four categories:
 "acceptable," not acceptable," "unusable," or "check for error." You are required to provide a
 written response which explains the masonfs) for all "not acceptable" or. "unusable"
data
 evaluations to your State or Regional Coordinator.  A "check for error" evaluation is advisory and
 does not require an official response.

 Use the attached check lists to identify data handling and analytical problems for all reported values
 that are "not acceptable."  Where sources of error are not readily apparent, your laboratory should
 make a systematic examination of all portions of its analytical and data reporting system.

 If any of your reported values are "unusable," this does not mean your data are incorrect, but our
 samples are designed to be quantifiable using approved methods Of analysis.  Check your reporting
 procedures and the detection limits of your analytical system and provide a written explanation for
 your selection of any "less than" or "greater than" response to your State or Regional
 Coordinator.

 To make sure problems have been adequately resolved we strongly recommend that your laboratory
 demonstrate correction of analytical problems by analyzing a JQC sample for each analyte for
 which performance was  "not acceptable."  Suitable chemistry GJC samples are commercially
 available.  If toxicity reference samples are needed the laboratory may use materials left over from
 the study, or obtain additional reference toxicant samples from the USEPA contractor (ManTech ,•«*"-•:
 Environmental  Technology, Inc., phone (919) 406-2114, FAX (919) 406-2246).                 *

 Send documents of corrective actions and results from  analyses of QC samples to vour State
 or Regional Coordinator (as specified in the attached pages). Your response is due no later than
 March 29.1999. and will be considered by the USEPA/State in determining the need for further
follow-up.  Please refer to your NPDES permit number in all correspondence. Contact your
coordinator with any questions or to request "true" values for additional analytes present in the
samples.
           Recycled/Recyclable
                        • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (40% Postconsumer)

-------
Beginning with the 1999 DMR-QA Study 19, designated permittee will be required to obtain study
samples from National Institute of Standards and Technology accredited commercial providers.  If
you are required to participate in DMR-QA Study 19, you will be receiving an announcement letter
from the USEPA in the next several months. This letter will provide specific directions for obtaining
test samples and reporting test results.

On behalf of the USEPA and your state environmental agency, I would like to thank you for your
cooperation and participation in this QA program. I trust that this program will continue to fulfil the
needs of all stakeholders under its new organizational structure.
                                         Sincerely,
                                         Elaine G. Stanley, Director
                                         Office of Compliance

-------
                                                  DMR-QA STATE  COORDINATORS
  Alabama.
  E. John Williford
  ALDept. ofEnv.Mgt.
  1890 A. Cong. W.L. Dickinson Dr.
  Montgomery, AL 36109
  (334) 260-2700 .

  Alaska
  Karen Hoover
  US EPA, Region X
  OW-133
  1200 Sixth Ave.
  Seattle, WA 98101
  (206) 553-1213

  American Samoa
  Sheila Wiegman
  American Samoa EPA
  Environmental Quality Commission
  Pago Pago, AS 96799
  (684) 633-2304

  Arizona
  Gary Brussels
  AZ Dept. of Health Services
  Environmental Lab Licensure
  3443 North Central Ave., Suite 810
  Phoenix, AZ 85012
  (602) 255-3454

  Arkansas
  Dick Cassat
  AR Dept of Poll. Ctrl. & Ecology
  8001 National Drive
  Little Rock, AR 72209
  (501) 682-0744

  California
  Bill Ray
  CA State Water Res. Control Board
 PO Box 944213
 Sacramento, CA 95814-0100
  (916)657-1123

 Colorado
 Carla Lenkey
 CO Dept. of Public Division
 Field Support Section
 4300  S. Cherry Creek Dr.
 Denver, CO  80222-1530
  (303) 692-3603

 Connecticut
 Donald Gonyea
 CT Dept. of Env. Protection
 Water Management Bureau
 PO Box 5066
 Hartford, CT 06106-5066
 (860)424-3827

 Delaware
 Joe Mulrooney
 DNR&EC
 Water Pollution Branch
 PO Box 1401
 Dover, DE 19903
 (302)739-5731
* NPDES Delegated State
   District of Columbia
   William Ruby
   Environmental Regulation Admin.
   Water Resources Management Div.
   2100 M.L. King Jr. Ave, SB
   Washington, DC 20020
   (202) 645-6601 ext. 3032

 * Florida
   EdSinis
   US EPA, Region IV
   Water Management Div. (CWAES)
   100 Alabama St., SW - Atlanta Federal
   Center
   Atlanta, GA 30303-3104
   (404) 562-9768

   Carlos Boueres
   FL Dept. of Env. Protection
   Quality Assurance Section
   2600 Blear Stone Road, MS 6505
   Tallahassee, FL 32399
   (904)488-2796

   Georgia
   Jeff Larson
   GADept of Natural Resources
  Env. Protection Div.
  4244 Int. Pkwy, Suite 110 - Atlanta
  Tradeport
  Atlanta, GA 30354
   (404)362-2680

  Guam
  Jesus Salas
  Guam EPA
  POBox22439-GMF
  Tiyan Barrigada, GU 96921
   (671)472-8863

* Hawaii
  Rendy Chow
  HI Dept. of Health
  State Laboratories Div.
  2725 Waimano Home Rd.
  Pearl City, HI 96782
  (808)453-6684

  Idaho
  Karen Hoover
  US EPA, Region X
  OW-133
  1200 Sixth Ave.
  Seattle, WA 98101
  (206) 553-1213

* Illinos
  Erin Rednour
 . BHnois EPA
  Bureau of Water
  PO Box 19276
  Springfield, IL 62702
  (217)782-9720

 Indiana
 Barbara D. McDowell
 IN Dept. of Env. Mgt, OWM
 Oper. Assist. & Training Section
 PO Box 6015
 Indianapolis, IN 46206-6015
  (317)233-6464
   Iowa
   Charles Furrey
   IA Dept. of Natural Resources.
   Henry A. Wallace Bldg. '
   900 E. Grand •''•,
   DesMoines.IA 50319
   '(515)281-4067

   Kansas     ;
   JackMcKenzie
   Kansas Dept. of Health & Env.
   Laboratory Services & Research
   Forbes Field Bldg. #740
   Topeka, KS  66620-0001
   (913)296-1639  ,

   Kentucky   ;
   Donna Drury :
   KY  Dept. for Env. Protection
   Division of Water
   14 Reilly Rd. Ft. Boone PJaza
   Frankfort, KY 40601
   (502) 564-3410 ext. 461

   Louisana
   Elaine Sorbet '
   LDEQ Water 1Mb
   8618 GSRI   .
   Baton Rouge, LA  70808
   (504) 765-2406

   Maine       ',
   David Dodge
   ME Dept. of Env. Protection
   Div. of Water Resource Regulation
   State House, Station 17
  Augusta, ME 04333   ,  '
   (207) 287-7659

* Maryland  ••,
  MarlenePatillo1
  MD Dept. of the Environment
  Div. of Municipal Compliance
  2500 Broening Highway
  Baltimore, MD 21224
   (410)631-3646;

  Melvin Knott  ;
  MD Dept. of the Environment
  Industrial Wastewater Program
  2500 Broening Highway
  Baltimore, MD 21224
  (410)631-3906;    •

  Massachusetts
  PingYee      i
  MA Dept. of Env. Protection
  Div. of Water Pollution Control
  Training Center - Route 20
 Milbury, MA  01527
  (508)756-7281

' Michigan
 Clyde Marion  !
 US EPA, Region V
 (WC-15J)
 77 West Jackson Blvd.
 Chicago, IL 60604
  (312) 353-5966
  Minnesota
  Kim Sandrock
  MN Pollution Control Agency
  520 Lafayette Road
  St. Paul, MN  55155
  (651)296-7387

  Mississippi
  Phillip Bass
  MS Dept of Env. Quality
  Office of Pollution Control
  POBox 10385
  Jackson, MS 39204
  (601) 961-5143

  Missouri
  Jack Pate
  MO Dept. of Natural Resources
  Water Pollution Control Program
  205 Jefferson Street
  Jefferson City, MO 65101
  (573) 751-1399

  Montana
  Mike Pasichnyk
  MT Dept of Environmental Quality
  Water Protection Bureau
  POBox 200901
  Helena, MT'59620-0901
  (406)444-5326

 Nebraska
 Chris Helms
 Dept of Env. Quality
 Water Quality Division
 PO Box 98922
 Lincoln, NE 68509-8922
  (402)471-2186

 Nevada
 Wendall McCurry
 NV Div. of Environmental Protection
 Bureau of Water Quality Planning
 333 W. Nye Lane, Capitol Complex
 Carson City, NV 89701
  (702) 687-4670 ext. 3098

 New Hampshire
 Stephanie Larson
 NH Dept. of Env. Services
 Water Supply & Poll. Ctrl. Div.
 P.OBox95
 Concord, NH 03301
 (603)271-1493

 New Jersey
 Linda Mauel
 US EPA, Region JJ
 2890 Woodbridge Ave. (MS-220)
 Edison, NJ 08837-3679
 (732)321-6766

 New Mexico
Patrick Hanson
NM Environmental Dept.
Rennels Bldg., Rm. N 2050
POBox 26110
Santa Fe.NM 87501
 (505)827-2799
                                                                                                                                             Study 18

-------
                                                DMR-QA STATE COORDINATORS
' New York
 Linda Mauel
 US EPA, Region II
 2890 Woodbridgc Ave. (MS-220)
 Edison. NJ OSS37-3679
  (732)321-6766
 North Carolina
 Jim Meyer
 NC DEMflUboraloty Section
 NC Dept, of Env. Health & Nat. Res,
 4405 Reedy Creek Rd.
 Raleigh, NC 27607-4405
  (919) 733-3908

 North Dakota
 Jtwi Pficfcr
 NO Dept of Health
 Div. of Water Quality, Missouri Office
 Bldg,
  1200 Missouri Avenue
  Bismarek,ND S850S-5520
  (701)328-5228
  Northern Islands
  John I. Castro Jr.
  Div, of Env. Quality
  Muiina  Island
  TO Box  1304
  StlpM).CM 96950
   (670)234-6950
*Qhio
  Dave Foulkes
  Cftio EPA
   1571 Pcny Street
  Columbus, OH 43201
   (614)644-4240
   Oklahoma
   Aaron Milligan
   OK Dcpt of Environmental Qlty.
   1000 ME Tenth, 10th Floor
   Oklahoma City, OK 73117-1212
   (405)271-5205
 * Oregon
   JadyJohndohl
   OR Dep<, of Environmental Quality
   Executive Bldg,
   811SW Sixth Avc.
   Portland, OR 97204
    (503)229-6896
   Pennsylvania
   R. LturucWyrick
   PA DEP - Bureau of Water Quality Mgt.
   Div. of Permits &. Compliance
   PO Box 8465
   Hamburg, PA 17105-8465
    (717)783-2940
    CaryPcsek
    PA DEP
    Northwest Region, Water Mgt. Program
    (DMR-QA)
    101 South Mercer Street
    New Castle, PA  16101
    (412)656-3267
David Long
PA DEP
North-central Region, Water Mgt.
Program (DMR-QA)
208 W. Third St., Suite 101
Williamsport, PA 17701-6448
 (717) 327-3781

Randy King
PA DEP
South-central Region, Water Mgt.
Program (DMR-QA)
One Ararat Boulevard
Harrisburg,PA 17110
 (717) 657-4671

Thomas Sherk
PA DEP
Northeast Region, Water Mgt. Program
(DMR-QA)
2 Public Square
 Wilkes-Barre,PA 18711-0790
 (717) 826-2533

 David Burke
 PA DEP
 Southeast Region, Water Mgt. Program
 (DMR-QA)
 555 N. Lane, Lee Park, Suite 6010
 Consheohocken, PA  19428
  (610) 832-6106

 Charles Brethauer
 PA DEP
 Southwest Region, Water Mgt. Program
 (DMR-QA)
 400 Water Front Drive
 Pittsburgh, PA 15222-4745
  (412)442-4328

 Puerto Rico
 Linda Mauel
 US EPA, Region H
 2890 Woodbridge Ave. (MS-220)
  Edison, NJ 08837-3679
  (732)321-6766

  Rhode Island
  Benjamin Lovesky
  RIDept. of Env. Mgt.
  Div. of Water Resources
  235 Promenade Street
  Providence, RI 02908-5767
   (401) 222-3961 ext. 7268

  South Carolina
  Wayne Davis
  SC Dept of Health & Env. Control
  Laboratory Certification
  POBox72
  State Park, SC 29147
   (803) 935-6856

  South Dakota
  Stacy Reed
   SD Dept. of Env. & Natural Res.
  Point Source Control Program
   523  E. Capital, Joe Foss Bldg.
   Pierre, SD 57501-3181
   (605)773-3351
 Tennessee
 Pamela Townsend
 TN Dept. of Env. & Conservation
 Div. of Water Pollution Control
 401 Church Street
 Nashville, TN 37243-1234
  (615) 532-0677

 Texas
 Mary Stordal
 TNRCC
 5144 E. Sam Houston Pkwy. N.
 Houston, TX 77015
  (281) 457-5229

 Trust Territory
 Patricia Mack
 US EPA, Region DC
 Laboratory
  1337 South 46th St., Bldg. 201
 Richmond, CA 94804-4698
  (510)412-2333

  Carolyn Tambwekar
  US EPA, Region K
  1337 South 46th Street, Bldg 201
  Richmond, CA 94804-4698
  (510)412-2383

*Utah
  Mike Herkimer
  UT Dept. of Env. Quality
  Div. of Water Quality
  288 North 1460 West
  Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4870
   (801)538-6146

  Vermont
  Andrew Fish
  VT Dept. of Env. Conservation
   103 S. Main Street, Sewing Bldg.
  Waterbury, VT 05676
   (802)241-3739

  Virgin Islands
  Linda Mauel
   US EPA, Region H
   2890 Woodbridge Ave. (MS-220)
   Edison, NJ 08837-3679
   (732) 321-6766

   Virginia
   Elizabeth Ziomek
   VA Dept. of Env. Qlty.
   Water Division
   PO Box 10009
   Richmond, VA 23240
    (804) 698-4181

   Washington
   Stewart Lombard
   WA State Dept. of Ecology
   Quality Assurance Section
   PO Box 488
   Manchester, WA 98353
    (360) 895-4649
West Virginia
Don E. Caldwell
State of West Virginia
Dept. of Natural Resources
1201 Greenbrrer Street
Charleston, WV 25305
 (304) 558-2108

Wisconsin
Mike Kvitrud
WI Dept of Natural Resources
PO Box 7921
Madison, WI 53715
 (608) 621-8459

Tom Basher
 WI Dept. of Natural Resources
North Central District
 PO Box 818
 Rhinelander, WI 54501
 (715)369-8964

 Don Domincick
 WI Dept. of Natural Resources
 Southeast District
 PO Box 12436
 Milwaukee, WI 53212
 (414) 263-8717

 Colleen Higgins
 WI Dept. of Natural Resources
 Western District
 PO Box 4001
 Eau Claire, WI 54702
  (715) 839-1603

 Janet LaRose
 WI Dept. of Natural Resources
 Northwest District
 810 W- Maple St.
 Spooner,WI  54801-1255
  (715) 635-4067

 Roy Lemke
 WI Dept. of Natural Resources
 Southern District
  3911 Fish Hatchery Road
 Fitchburg,WI 53711
  (608)275-3283

  Linda Vogeri
  WI Dept. of Natural Resources
  Lake Michigan District
  PO Box 10448
  Green Bay, WI 54307-0448
  (414)492-5876

  Wyoming
  Edward Mock
  WY Dept. of Env. Quality
  Water Quality Division
  122 W. 25th St.
  Cheyenne, WY  82002
   (307) 777-7317
   * NPDES Delegated State
                                                                                                                                               Study 18

-------
        UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    DMR-QA LABORATORY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION STUDY 18

          CHECK LIST FOR FOLLOW-UP ON "NOT ACCEPTABLE" CHEMISTRY DATA

 1.      CHECK YOUR METHODS

        a.     EPA has approved specific methods for effluent monitoring. The list of approved
              methods is contained in 40 CFR Part 136, Table 1B, although official exemptions are
              possible; check to see that you are using an approved method.

        b.     Check to determine that your personnel are properly trained to perform these analyses.

        c.     If you are using an approved method and your personnel are properly trained, check to
              be sure the method is being performed properly.

 2.      CHECK THE DATA FROM YOUR ROUTINE QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM

        a.     Assess your QC program. Are you employing appropriate QC checks (methods blanks,
              calibration check samples, quality control samples, etc.) with your sample?

        b.     Assess your QC data results.  Are they within or outside of appropriate control limits? If
              outside, check factors that may have caused the abnormal reading (for example: if
              results from your method blanks show interfering substances; check the purity of your
              reagents, reagent water, glassware, etc.)         :

       c.     For further information on intralaboratory quality control programs and other good
              laboratory practices, see D 3856 Standard Guide for Good Laboratory Practices for
              Laboratories Engaged in Sampling and Analysis of Water, Vol. 11.01 of the Annual
              Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, 100  Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken PA
              19428-2959.                                ;

 3.     CHECK YOUR CALCULATIONS

       Be sure your calculations were properly done and that you reported the results in the proper
       units, e.g., for trace metals, were micrograms/liter (ug/l) used instead of milligrams/liter (mg/L)?
       Check the original instruction packet and have a colleague perform independent calculations to
       verify your results.

4.     CHECK FOR DATA REPORTING ERRORS

       Data reporting errors should be taken seriously. If you had a data reporting problem, e.g.,
       transcription error, etc., how are you going to strengthen your system for reporting routine DMR
       data to avoid similar problems in the future?

5.     CHECK TO SEE IF THE DMR-QA STUDY SAMPLES WERE PREPARED AND ANALYZED
       ACCORDING TO THE STUDY INSTRUCTIONS.

6.     DOCUMENTATION

       Submit all identified problems with supporting information and corrective actions, to your State or
       Regional Coordinator (as specified in the previous  pages).  •

-------

-------
       UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

   DMR-QA LABORATORY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION STUDY 18

            CHECK LIST FOR FOLLOW-UP ON "NOT ACCEPTABLE" DATA FROM
                           WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY TESTS

1.     CHECK TO SEE THAT STUDY INSTRUCTIONS WERE FOLLOWED
                                                          •• r    '••  b  ..'•     •'•  &
       a.     Were the dilution water and "Simulated Effluent" prepared according to the study
             instructions?            ,      « .,;       • ..  ,   .. .,. .,  .    .  ...  ,

       b.     Was the test conducted according to the instructions?

       c.     Check to be sure you reported the correct method code for your test procedure.

2.     CHECK THE DATA FROM YOUR ROUTINE QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM

       a.     Assess if you are performing reference toxicant testing at an appropriate frequency.

       b.     CHECK YOUR CULTURE CONDITIONS: Were culture/holding conditions
             (temperature, hardness, salinity, pH, etc.) similar toitest conditions?

                    Was your test water less than 48 hours old or more than 2 weeks old?

                    What was the hardness (or salinity) of the culture versjjs the test water?

       c.     TEST ORGANISMS: Were the test organisms of suitable age and condition (e.g., free
             from disease, taken from adequate brood size, low holding mortality, healthy condition
             upon arrival from supplier)?

       d.     TEST CONDITIONS:                        !

             i.   •    Check all required test conditions and make sure they have been met, e.g.,
                    temperature+1°C.                '   '.

             ii.      Were test conditions (temperature, dissolved oxygen, hardness or salinity, pH,
                    etc.) within acceptable limits?

             Hi.      Was a performance control (water of known or proven quality) employed in
                    addition to that specified in the instructions?  If so, did it perform as expected?

             fv.      Was a reference toxicant series included in the study?  If so, how did the results
                    compare to the control data chart?       ;

3.     CHECK YOUR CALCULATIONS

       a.     Did you use the correct amount of toxicant and dilution water in making your "simulated
            •effluent"?

       b.     Was a simulated data set (with known endpoints) subjected to statistical manipulations?

       c.     Check your computer program or hand calculations to verify your reported results.  Are
             your programs working properly? Are you using them properly?

                      (Turn page over to see remainder of Check list)

-------
       d.      Be sure you reported the results properly on the data reporting form.

       e.      Did you use the correct analysis method according to the study directions and analysis
              flowchart? In other words, did you check hypothesis testing assumptions, etc.?

4.     CHECK FOR DATA TRANSCRIPTION ERRORS

5.     CHECK TO DETERMINE THAT YOUR PERSONNEL ARE PROPERLY TRAINED TO
       PERFORM THESE ANALYSES

       Were personnel experienced with test procedures? Have the personnel run at least five
       reference toxicant tests?

6.     DOCUMENTATION

       Submit all identified problems with supporting information and corrective action, to your State or
       Regional Coordinator (as specified in the previous pages).
                                                      .a GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1998 -750-101/00011

-------