RESULTS OF 1968 SAMPLING PROGRAM
LAKE HURON BASIN OFFICE
LHBO 32-A
JANUARY 1969
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
Great Lakes Region
Lake Huron Basin Office
U.S. Naval Air Station
Grosse lie, Michigan
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
Par;e Ho.
PURPOSE 1
SCOPE 1
ORGANIZATION 1
ACTIVITY 1
SAMELUKJ AREAS
St. Marys River 5
Lake Huron Harbors, Alpena,, Oscoda, Lower Saglnaw Bay 16
St. Clair River 53
Lake St. Clair 63
Detroit River 76
Observation Runs 121
Raisin River l8l
Lake Erie 187
SPECIAL STUDIES
Monguagon Creek 205
Dissolved Oxygen Survey 206
Bottom Sediment Analysis Results 210
Special Iron Study 233
Oil Observations 239
Elizabeth Park Canal 2^8
Detroit River Bacteriological Study 2^9
Salmonella Serotypes 250
Automatic Monitor Results 253
WSS Results 257
Mobil Marine Monitor Run 259
High Water Studies 267
LABORATORY METHODS 271
-------
Lint of ?r.blcn
Pogc No.
1958 snnpic i",~.ii:-:- i"' ".-'..
1. St. Mnryn Rivr.r 6
2. Lake Huron - AVpim; 17
3. Lake Huron - Oococu. 26
'u SnsinaT Bay f- nir'" 3?
5. Gt. Clnir Elver 5^
6. I," he St. Clair 6h
J. Detroit River 77
8. Obccrvntion Ri.mo - Dot:-:<:".-;, ^."v;!- 122
9. Bnicin River 182
10. Lake Erie 180
11. Monguacon Creek 205
12. Dincolved Oxygen f\-:-/cy ,'LT ^9) 206
13. Open Water GecUincni. Di'.r-jr. ;:. (DT 3-9) . 211
l'(. Crnnny Inland Gcc"..!:. . ,u . " . . . 1 2l6
15. ROXIGC River GecHnmi.r. 219
16. Hui-on River Geflirv::it:; 223
17. Bailee Hnrljor fJec! !n: V.;-; 226
18. Rninin River GccliK-n:,r^ 229
19. Toledo Hnrlior f>'U'--.", ).' r_ :-;-! 232
20. Lnl:e fit. Clnir r>n--'-' '."-- nturi-" 2^'f
21. 19SO Oil Survey * 2^0
22. Elizabeth Fork Cntr-l 2H8
23. Special Bncterlolo/;ic,il Siv.uy - Dotro:'v. Bivcr 2^9
2't. Gnlmonnlla Seixityji^r, 250
25. Automatic Monitor Rcnultn 253
26. \JPSB ^'lJ>3 -Gilm-tf.fcnr 257
27. I'a 11 Marine Moni^: r K -). 2ul
28. High Water Study 268
29. Su-tEnry of L^borr ' cr-- FrocGdivroc 272
f,(.
-------
List of Figures
Page No.
1. Sampling Area k
2. Sampling Ranges - St. Marys River 5
3. Sampling Stations - Alpena Harbor 16
h. Sampling Stations - Oscoda 25
5. Sampling Stations - Lower Saginav Bay 3U
6. Sampling Ranges - St. Clair River 53
7. Sampling Stations - Lake St. Clair 63
8. Sampling Ranges - Detroit River 76
9. Industrial Outfalls - Detroit River 121
10. Sampling Stations - Raisin River l8l
ll. Sampling Stations - Lake Erie ' > 187
12. Sampling Stations - R66, R77, and DT 3.9 20l*
13. Sampling Stations - Grassy Island 215
lit. Sampling Stations - Rouge River 218
15. Proposed Dredging Site - Huron River 222
16. Proposed Dredging Site-Bolles Harbor 225
17. Proposed Dredging Site-Raisin River 228
18. Sampling Stations - Lake St. Clair Iron Study 233
19. Sampling Stations - Trenton Channel 238
20. Mobil Marine Monitor Run v 26*0
21* Sampling Stations - High Water Study 267
ill
-------
Results of 1968 Sampling Program
Lake Huron Basin Office
INTRODUCTION
PURPOSE
The annual Data Report presents the water quality analyses
that were collected by the Lake Huron Basin Office (FWPCA) during
1968.
SCOPE
This report includes the results of analyses of samples collected
lay Lake Huron Basin Office in 1968. Averages of parameters with three
or more individual measurements are also presented, except for water
temperatures. Data from analysis of water and "bottom sediment samples
from the Rouge and Detroit Rivers and several Michigan Harbors are
reported in the 1968 Dredging Study (DPO 31-A).
ORGANIZATION
The Lake Huron Basin Office of Federal Water Pollution Control
Administration is located at the U.S. Naval Air Station at Grosse
lie, Michigan and represents the Great Lakes Region Federal Water
Pollution Control Administration in the Lake Huron drainage "basin
as well as the Southeastern Michigan drainage basin to Lake Erie.
The staff of 20 people include engineers, chemists, microbiologists,
biologists and a supporting staff of field and office personnel.
ACTIVITY
As a combined Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
surveillance and International Joint Commission activity, samples
-------
vore collected from the St. Marys River, Lake Huron Harbors, St. Clair
River, Late St. Clair, Detroit River, Raioin River, Lake Erie and
their tributaries The mjority of the phyolcal, chemical and "bacte-
riological analyses were performed at the Grosse He laboratory.
Temporary laboratory facilities vcre net up at Sault Ste Marie, Ontario
for the St. Maryo River curvey.
The data for these areas are presented in the first section of
thio report. The sampling ranges and/or stations are illuotrated
on the location mapa inserted at the beginning of each data cection.
Also included in this section are the Detroit, Rouge and Raisin
River observation runs. Detailed descriptions of the 1968 observed
discharges are listed for each outfall. Each of the major industries
observed are shown on the location map at the front of this cection.
Locations of the numbered outfalls are indicated by mile point
designations. For example, M^( is 1^.86 miles north of a base point
at the mouth of the Detroit River. Summary notes on the general
appearance of the rivers are presented on pages 1358 to IT1*/".
Data previously reported in the 1968 Dredging Study Report
(DPO 31-A) are not repeated in this document. Supplimentary data
to the above report are included, however, in the Special Studies
Section of this report.
The automatic monitor at Gibraltar, Michigan continuously
records changes in the temperature, conductivity and dissolved osygen
in the Detroit River (Table 25). This instrument was also used for
the special study entitled Mobil Marine Monitor Run (Table 27), during
which time, It was not recording the water quality at Gibraltar.
2
-------
The results of various other specialized water quality investi-
gations are included in Tables 11 through 28 at the end of this
report.
-------
FIOURb
LAKE
1 HICHIOAN , _
""OHIO "
LAKE HURON DASIN OFFICE
SAMPLING AREA
SCALE: IN MILES
O. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
GREAT LAKES REGION OROSSE ILE, MICHIGAN
-------
ONTARIO
1911 OUTFALL
WHITEFI5H
BAY
SAULT STE. MARIE
(ONTARIO)
SAULT
STE. MARIE
(MICHIGAN)
STP
OUTFALL
LAKE "HURON BASIN OFFICE;
SAMPLING RANGES
ST. MARYS RIVER
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
GREAT LAKES REGION OROSSE ILE, MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
StlO 8.SE
STP OUTFALL
MUNUSCOXG LAKE
-------
OY
Range SMLT 5.6
Station:
Date
7-17
7-18
7-19
T-20
7-21
Date
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
Average
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
M375
1000
16.0
16.0
15.0
16.0
1
1
1
1
1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
1-D76
1300
16.0
16.0
12.5
1*1.0
15.0
1
1
1
2
1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
TABLE 1
1968'SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Marys River
Parameter: Temperature °c
FWPCA, LHBO
MO 77
1600
'15.5
1*1.0
12.0
13-5
1*1.0
P;
1
1
1
1
1
1
MO 78
1900
15.0
lU.O
13.0
1*1.0
.rameter:
1
1
1
1
1
1
Parameter:
-------
Range SMU
Station:
Date
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
Average
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
Average
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
5.6
M075
1000
.2
.1
.2
.2
.2
.2
10.8
10.8
10.5
10.6
10.3
10.6
.01
< .01
.(A
.03
TABLE 1
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Marys River
Parameter: Nitrate mg/1
FWPCA, LHBO
1300
.2
.1
.2
.1
.2
.2
10.9
10.8
10.9
10.8
10.6
10.8
M077
1600
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
1-5078
1900
.2
.2
.1
.1
.2
.2 .2
Parameter:
10.9
11.2
11.3
10.9
10.9
11.0
11.0
11.2
10.9
10.6
10.7
10.9
Parameter:
.01
< .01
.02
.02
< .01
< .01
.05
< .01
< .01
.19
.02
MD79
2200
.2
.2
.1
.2
.2
.2
DO mg/1
11.1
11.2
11.0
10.8
10.8
11.0
Total PO, mg/1
.01
.02
.33
.02
Average
.02
.02
.13
.06
.10
-------
co
Range SMU
Station:
Date
5.6
Average
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
Median
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
MOT5
1000
.01
< .01
.02
.02
.02
< .01
TABLE i
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Marys River
Parameter: Soluble POi mg/1
M>79
2200
.01
.01
.31
.01
.10 .06 .09
Parameter: Total Coliform MF/100 ml
F^PCA, LHBO
VDT6
1300
H»»^^VH«
.01
.01
.01
.01
13377
1600
< .01
< .01
.37
.02
M378
'1900
< .01
.01
.19
< .01
10
10
20 .
10
10
10
< 10
20
10
< 10
10
10
10
10
10
10
< 10
10
< 10
10
20
10
< 10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
Parameter: Ammonia-N mg/1
.06
< .05
< .05
< .05
.06
< .05
< .05
< .05
< .05
.06
.05
< .05
.05
< .05
.06
.12
< .05
< .05
.05
< .05
.06
< .05
.08
.05
< .05
Average
.05
.05
.05
.06
.06
-------
TABLE 1
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Marys River
Parameter: Organic-IT mg/1
Range SMU 5.6 . FWPCA, LHBO
Station: MQ75
1000
Date
<
<
<
<
I-D76
1300
.05
.05
.05
.05
.08
.06
l-£>77
1600
.09
.05
< .05
< .06
.05
.06
M078
1900
c .05
< .05
< .05
.06
.05
.06
Paraneter:
.02
.01
.01;
.01
.02
-05
.01
.ok
< .01
.01
.02
< .01
< .01
< .01
.01
M079
2200
.09
< .05
< .05
.07
< .05
.06
Iron ng/1
.02
.01
.01
.01
.01
7-17 .09
7-18 < .05
7-19 < .05
7-20 < .05
7-21 < .05
Average .06
7-17 .02
7-18 .03
7-19 .07
7-20 .02
7-21 .03
Average .03 -02 .02 .01 .01
-------
H
O
Range: SMD 2.0E
Station: M109
100
Date
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
Average
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
Average
14.0
15.0
14.0
14.0
3A. 5
1
1
2
1
1
14-5
15.0
14.0
lU.O
1
1
1
2
1
TABLE l
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Marys River
Parameter: Tenrnerature C
Mill
1500
14.5
15.0
13-5
14.0
15.0
M112
2100
14.5
15.0
i4.o
13-5
14.5
Parameter:
1
1
1
1
1
1.
1
l
2
1
M113
3000
14.5
15.0
14.0
14.0
15.0
Chloride
1
2
1
1
1 .
M114
_ 3500
14.5
15-0
l4.o
14.0
15-0
Eg/1
1
2
2
2
2
Parameter: Phenols ug/1
MLL5
4coo
16.0
15-5
15.0
lit. 5
15.0
1
2
2
2
1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1-
< 1
< 1
1
< 1
< 1
< i:
< 1
< i
< 1
< 1
< i
< 1
< 1
< 1
3
< 1
< 1
< 1
1
16
7
< 1
< i
36
12
53
52
25
40
81
50
88
78
96
99
95
91
FWPCA, LHBO
-------
Range SMD 2.0E
Station:
Date
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
Median
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
M109
100
100
TABLE 1
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Marys River
Parameter: Total Coliform. MF/100 ml
M110
500
Mill
1500
ML12
2100
M113
3000
Mil 5
4000
60
4,500
100
30
420
ho
3,000
80
20
1,180
10
20
50
20
100
30
60
50
< 10
30
90
100
110
10
71*0
640
820
320
110
1000
740
3,300
2,100
1,300
8co
80 . 20 30
Parameter:
100
64o 1,300
Iron mg/1
01
02
03
02
02
.03
.06
.02
.03
.02
.01
.01
.01
.02
02
.02
.01
.03
.01
.07
.07
.02
.03
.03
.22
.07
.03
.05
.07
.22
.14
.07
.14
.06
-
FWPCA, LHBO
Average
.02
.03
.01
.03
.07
.09
.10
-------
ro
Range: SMD 8.5E
Station:
Date
7-17
7-18
7-19.
7-20
7-21
7-17 N
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
Average
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-2L
Average
100
15.0
14.5
14.0
14.0
1
1
1
1
1
22
9
5
10
12
15.0
15.0
14.5
.14.0
1
1
1
1
1
24
15
22
26
22
. TABLE 1
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Marys River
Parameter: Temperature
SMD5.3W
!
800
16.0
15-5
14.5
i4.o
i
i
i
i
i
22
24
16
23
21
21
Parameter:
10.29
100
14.0
15.0
14.0
13.5
14.0
Chloride
1
1
1
1
1
ML30
500
14.0
15.0
14.0
13-5
14.5
1*3/1
1
1
1
1
1
Parameter: Phenol
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
<1
< 1
< 1
< 1
<1
LHBO
lU.O
15.0
3A.O
13.0
3A.5
1
1
1
1
1
< 1
-------
10.6
Range: SI-ID 8.5E
Station: Ml40
100
Date
7-17
7-18 .
7-19
7-20
7-21
Average
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
Average
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
Average
*Not averaged
.03
.02
.07
.07
TABLE 1
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Marys River
Parameter : -QQ . ^g/i
EMD 5.3W
Ml43 ML29 ML30
800 100 500
10.9
10.6
10.4
10.6
10.3
10.6
10.4
10.3
10.3
10.2
10.8
10.5
10.4
10.5
10.2
11.3
10.9
11.0
11.0
10.4
11.1
11.0
10.9
10.9
.10.8
n.i
10.8
10.9
10.9
io.4
10.4 10.5 10.9 10.9 10.8
Parameter: Total POi mg/1
01
04
01
07
.01
..20
.01
2.2-*
.01
.09
.16
.09
< .01
.02
.01
.36*
.01
< .01
.01
1.3*
< .01
.02
.02
1.4*
.09
.01
.01
.02
Parameter: Soluble POi mg/1
.01
.02
< .01
.05
< .01
.18
< .01
2.1*
.01
.08
.14
.06
< .01
.01
< .01
.32*
< .01
< .01
< .01
1.1*
< .01.
.01
< .01
1.4*
.07
< .01 < .01
< .01
FWPCA, LHBO
-------
Range:' SMD 8.5E
Station: MlUo
100
Date
TABLE 1
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Marys River
Parameter: Nitrate mg/1
SI-ID 5.3W
1-0.42 ia43 M.29
500 800 100
IWPCA, LHBO
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
Average
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
Average
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
.2
.2
.2
, .2
.2
.2
.13
.12
.22
.10
.16
.15
.10
< .05
< .05
< .05
< .05
.2
.2
.2
.1
.1
.2
25
.26
.25
.24
.38
.28
< .05
.31*
< .05
< .05
< .05
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
Parameter:
.24
.29
.22
.26
.30
.26
Parameter:
.07
< .05
.05
< .05
< .05
.2
.2
.2
.1
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
' .1
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
Aminonia-N ng/1
.05
.05
.07
.06
.07
.06
.05
< .05
- < .05
< .05
< .05
< .05
< .05
< .05
.10
.06 ,
< .05
.05
Organic-N ing/1
.07
30
< .05
.07
< .05
< .05
.11
< .05
< .05
< .05
.07
< .05
< .05
.08
< .05
Average
< .05
< .05
05
.10 < .05
.06
-------
-) I
H
V/l
Range SI-ID 8.5E
Station:
Date
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
Median
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
7-21
100
150
500
310
150
TABLE 1
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Marys River
Parameter: Total Coliform MF/100 ml
SMD 5-3tf
ML^3 ML29 ML30
500 800 100 500
320
1*50
520
300
1,300
380
_
780
1*80
1,200
1*50
630
Parameter:
.08
".03
.06
.06
.09
.08
.06
.05
.05
.11
.11
.07
.09
'. .10
.08
170 30
Iron mg/1
120
800
170
50
330
10
90
30
10
50
10
Uo
50
10
< 10
10
.03
.(A
.01
.03
.02
.03
.02
.01
.02
.02
.Oil
.02
.03
.02
.07
FWPCA, LHBO
Average
.05
.07
.09
.03
.02
.(A
-------
SCALE IN FEET
LAKE HURON BASIN OFFICE
LOCATION OF SAMPLING STATIONS
ALPENA HARBOR
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
GREAT LAKES REGION QROSSE ILE, MICHIGAN
16
-------
TABLE 2
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Huron - Alpena
Parameter: Temperature C
FWPCA, LHBO
Station:
Date
8-oA
10-15
8-llj
10-15
8-lit
10-15
8-llt
10-15
8-llt
10-15
Alp.
68-1
" 16.5
Ik.0
220
2*tO
9.6
10.3
.3
*
8.k
8.1
Alp.
68-2
17.0
llt.O
210
260
9-5
9-4.'
. 3
lit
8.1*
7.6
Alp. Alp.
68-3 68-1*
18.0 17.5
13.0 . 13.5
Parameter:
220 220
2kQ 250
Parameter:
9-5 9-3
10.0 9.6
Parameter:
3 3
8 6
Parameter:
. 8. It . 8.2
8.2 8.2
Alr>.
68^5
18.0
15.0
Alp.
68-6
16.0
13.5
Alp.
68-7
16.5
13.0
Alp.
68-8
18.0
13.0
Alp.
68-9
18.5
lU-5
H-361
19.0
15.0
Conductivity umhos/cm
220
280
DO mg/1
9-3
9.6
Phenols
3
5
pH S.U.
8.3
8.2
2io
260
9.6
9.2
ug/1
2
10
8.1*
7-7
220
230
9.5
10.3
k
8.2
8.2
220
230
9.^
10.2
2
5
8. It
8.2
-22"0
260
9.1
9-7
it
8.3
8.3
270
270
8.9
:.9-3
3
3
8.2
7.8
-------
M
00
TABLE 2
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Huron - Alpena
Parameter: Temperature C
Station:
rta t*p
Ud L>C
8-llf
10-15
i
8-llf
10-15
8-llf
10-15
8-lU
10-15
8-llf
10-15
"Alp.
68-10 :
17.0
12.5
220
220
9-5
10.2
3
2
8. If
8.2
Alp.
68-11
16.0
13.0
210
230
9.5
10.3
if
6
8.5
8.2
Alp. Alp.
68-12 68-13
16.0 16.6
. 12.5 12.5
Parameter: Conductivity umhos/cra
210 220
2l*0 220
Parameter: DO 'mg/1
9-5 9-1*
9-9 10.5
Parameter: Phenols ug/1
3 if
* 3 ' . .
Parameter: pH S.U.
8. If 8. If
8.0 8.0
, B.TCA, LIIBO
-------
H
VO
Station:
Date
8-14
10-15
8-14
10-15
8-14
10-15
8-14
10-15
8-14
10-15
TABLE 2
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Huron - Alpena
Parameter: Chlorides mg/1
FWPCA, LHBO
Alp.
68-1
6
Alp.
68-2
6
Alp.
68-3
6
Alp.
68-4
6
Parameter:
.05
.06
.06
.09
.08
.05
.05
.06
Parameter:
.05
.03
.05
-03
.08
.02
.05
.Oil
Parameter:
< .1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
< .1
.1
Parameter:
660
1,900
ho
2,300
2,200
520
1,700
1,000
Alp.
68-5
5
7
Alp.
68-6
6
Total Phosphates
.08
.38' '
Soluble
.08
.3*
.05
.10
Alt).
60-7
5
5
mg/1
.06
.05
Alp.
68-8
5
5
.08
.07
Alp.
68-9
5
6
.09
.07
H-361
5
7
.13
.10
Phosphates mg/1
.oh
.03
.Ok
.02
.06
.03
.05
.04
.08
.06
Nitrates mg/1
.1
.3
.1 .
.2
Total Coliform
2,300
5,300
30
1,800
< .1
.1
MF/100 ml
600
310
< .1
.1
1,800
180
< .1
.1
1,900
660
< .1
.2
V
7,000
15,000
-------
TABLE 2
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Huron - Alpena
Parameter: Chlorides mg/1
BJPCA, LHBO
Station:
Date
10-15
8-iU
10-15
8-llf
10-15
8-lU
10-15
8-m
10-15
AlTD.
. 68-10
5
6
.06
.06
.06
.03
< .1
.2
no
130
Alp.
68-11
5
5
.06
.05
.05
.03
< .1
.2
110
ll*0
Alt). Alp.
68ll2 68-13 :
5
5
.05
< .01
.Oil
< .01
.1
.1
100
150
5
5
Parameter: Total Phosphates mg/1
.07
< .01
Parameter: Soluble Phosphates mg/1
. .06
< .01
Parameter: Nitrates mg/1
.1
.1
Parameter: Total Coliform MF/100 nl
120
130
-------
TABLE 2
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Huron - Alpena
Parameter: Acraonia-IT mg/1
FWPCA, LHBO
Station;
Date
8-14
10-15
8-14
10-15
8-]A
10-15
8-ll*
10-15
8-14
10-15
: Alt).
68ll
< .05
.09
< .05
.23
170
150
160
150
10
3
Alp.
68-2
< .05
< .05
< .05
3*
160
160
160
150
5
13
Alt). ATo.
681 3 68-h
< .05
<..05
.09
.29
170
140
170
130
2
6
< .05
< .05
Parameter:
.06
.29
Parameter:
150
150
Parameter:
150
140
Parameter:
4
6
Alp.
68^5
< .05 <
< .05
Organic-N
< .05
.35
Alp.
68-6
.05
.08
mg/1
.06
.35
Alp.
68-7
< .05
.09
.10
.21
Alt).
68-8
< .05
< .05
< .05
.27
Alp.
68-9
19
.08
.14
.24
H-36
* ^BMHMM
< .05
.'27
< .05
57
Total Solids mg/1
140
170
Dissolved
140
160
Suspended
3
13
150
150
Solids
150
150
Solids
6
150
130
mg/1
140
120
mg/1
8
8
130 .
160
120
150
6
6
120
160
120
160
6
6
220
170
210
160
3
13
-------
TABLE 2
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Huron - Alpena
Parameter: Ammonia-N mg/1
FIJPCA, LHBO
Station:
Date
8-3A
10-15
8-lU
10-15
8-1*1
10-15
8-lU
10-15
8-lU
10-15
Alp.
68-10
.n
< .05
.56
.21
120
ll»0
no
130
it
10
Al-o.
68-n
.10
.10
.51
.18
no
ito
no
l*fO
2
3
Alp. Alp.
68-12 68-13
.11
.11
.'(0
110
150
100
150
6
7
.lU
< .05
Parameter:
^
Parameter:
120
lltO
Parameter:
V
120
130
Parameter:
6
8
Organic-N mg/1
Total Solids mg/1
Dissolved Solids mg/1
Suspended Solids mg/1
*
-
-------
Station:
Date
8-14
10-15
TABLE 2
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Huron - Alpena
Parameter: Sulfate mg/1
-
w 10-15
FWPCA, LHBO
Alp.
68-1
14
15
Alp.'
68-2
13
16
Alp.
68-3
13
19
Alp.
68-4
4o
25
Parameter:
32
96
< 2
360
l4o "
18
190
Ik
Alp.
68-5
13
20
Alp.
68-6
12
19
Fecal Coliform MP/100
ito
560
5
64
Alp.
68-7
12
17
ml
42
6
Alp.
68-8
12
19
120
< 2
Alp.
68-9
12
25
64
10
H-361
13
19
1,600
2,300
-------
TABLE 2
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Huron - Alpena
Parameter: Sulfate
FWPCA, LHBO
Station: Alp. Alp. Alp. Alp.
68-10 . 68-11 68-12 68-13
Date ' - ___.
8-lU 12 12 12 12
10-15 16 15 17 15
Parameter: Fecal Colifonn. MF/100 ml
8-llf 110 < 2 < 2 16
10-15 U 62 10 2
-------
FIGURE 4
OSCODA
YOIO
AU SABLE
LAKE HURON BASIN OFFICE
LOCATION OF SAMPLING STATIONS
OSCODA
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
OREAT LAKES REOION OROSSE ILE, MICHIGAN
-------
TABLE 3
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Huron - Oscoda
Parameter: Tenroerature °
FWPCA, LHBO
Station:
Date
8-20
10-16
Date
8-20
10-16
Date
8-20
10-16
Date
8-20
10-16
H-301
19-5
13.0
220
210
8.3
8.2
*
1
1
H-302
21.5
15.0
290
320
8.1
8.2
2
1
H-303 E-30k
20.0 19.0
12.5 12.5
Parameter:
220 220
220 220
Parameter:
8.1* Q.h
8.2 8.2
Parameter:
2 h
1 1
OSC
68-1
19.0
12.5
OSC
68-2
19.0
12.5
OSC
68-3
20.0
1^.0
OSC
68-fr
20.0
13-0
OSC
68-5
19-0
12.5
OEC
68-6
19.0
12.0
Conductivity umnos/cia
220
220
pH S.U.
8.1*
8.2
Phenol
2
2
220
220
8.3
8.2
ug/1
2
1
220
250
. 8,3
8.0
1
1
220
220
8.3
8.2
3
< 1
220
220
8.3
8.1
2
210
220
8.1*
8.2
2
1
-------
TABLE 3
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS . "
Lake Huron - Oscoda
Parameter: Temperature C
FWPCA, LHBO
Station: OSC Y-010
' 68-7
Date
8-20 19.0 22.0
10-16 12.5 15-0
Parameter: Conductivity umhos/cm
Date
8-20 220 300
10-16 220 330
Parameter: pH S.U.
Date
8-20 8.3 8.0
10-16 8.2 8.2 .
Parameter: Phenol ug/1
Date
8-20 < 1 < 1
10-16 1 2
-------
TABLE 3
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Huron - Oscoda
Parameter: Chloride ng/1
FT^PCA, LHBO
Station:
Date
8-20
10-16
Date
M 8-20
00 10-16
Date
8-20
10-16
8-20
10-16
H-301
6
8.8
10.lt
.1
.1
.06
.03
H-302 H-303 H-30
It 6 6
Parameter:
7.3 8.8 8.8
8. U 10.5 10.5
Parameter:
< .1 .1 .1
.1 .1 .1
Parameter:
.11 .06 .06
.09 .21 .08
It OSC
68-1
6
Dissolved
8.8
10.5
Nitrates
.1
.1
OSC
68-2
It
6
Oxygen
8.8
10.3
rng/1
'.1
.1
Total Phosphates
.05
.05
19
.03
OSC
68-3
5
5
rag/1
8.7
9.6
.1
.1
Dg/1
.05
.11
OSC
68-it
6
8.9
10.3
.1
.1
.05
.03
OSC OSC
68-5 68-6
^ 5
6 6
8.9 9.0
10.3 10.1
.1 .1
.1 ; .1
.06 .05
.0*t .06
-------
Station:
OSC
68-7
TABLE 3
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Huron - Oscoda
Parameter: Chloride ng/1
Y-010
FWPCA, LHBO
tv>
Date
8-20
10-16
Date
8-20
10-16
Date
8-20
10-16
Date
8-20
10-16
8.9
10.3
.1
.1
.06
15
k
5
7.0
Q.h
< .1
.1
.17
.15
Parameter: Dissolved Oxygen mg/1
Parameter: Nitrates mg/1
Parameter: Total Phosphates mg/1
-------
TABLE 3
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Huron - Oscoda .
Parameter: Soluble Phosphates mg/1
FWPCA, LUBO
Station:
Date
8-20
10-16 "
Date
10-16
H-301
.03
.01
.25
.17
H-302
.Oil
.08
.36
.20
H-303
.05
.20
Para
.ho
.17
E-30h OSC
68-1
.05
.06
meter:
.53
.19
Parameter:
Date
8-20
10-16
.13
.06
.16
.08
.10
.07
.12
< .05
Parameter:
Date
8-20
10-16
12
30
6h
620
270
< 10
16
.05
.Oil
Organic-IT
.16
Amnionia-II
.19
< .05
OSC
68-2
.17
.03
mg/1
.23
.111
mg/1
.09
.07
Total Coliform
Ii70
60
230
10
OSC
68-3
.Oil
.10
.27
.12
.08
< .05
MP/100 ml
600
260
OSC
68-h
.oh
.02
.25
.18
.08
.08
260
70
OSC
68-5
.oh-
.02
.21
.12
.08
< .05
60
30
OSC
68_.:6
.03
.05
.23
.15
.09
< .05
10
70 .
-------
TABLE 3
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS ,
Lake Huron - Oscoda
Parameter: Soluble Phosphates ing/1
FWPCA, LHBO
Station: OSC Y-010
68-7 - ' ! - . '
Date
8-20 .04 .13 " .
10-16 .12 .15
Parameter: Organic-N mg/1
Date
uj 8-20 .22
10-16 .14 .21
Parameter: Ammonia-N mg/1
Date ' . .
8-20 .20 .. .16 , ',
. 10-16 < .05 .12 , !
Parameter: Total Coliform. MF/100 ml
Date i .
8-20 , 100 430
10-16 60 470 -
-------
U)
ro
TABLE 3 -
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Huron - Oscoda .
Parameter: Fecal Coliform MF/100 ml
FJPCA, LHBO
Station:
Jlatfi
8-20
10-16
Date
8-20
10-16
H-301 H-302
2 It
< 2 .18
no 200
110 180
H-303
< 2
.< 2
Paran
130
130
H-3(& OSC
68-1
2
< 2
?eter:
150
130
Parameter:
8-20
10-16
no 190
110 180
130
130
lltO
130
Parameter:
Date
8-20
10-16
b 9
it 6
It
5
6
i
Parameter:
Date
8-20
10-16
13 < 10
17 10
12
16
12
18
<5
< 2
OSC
68-2
< 5
< 2
OSC
68-3
<5
6
OSC
68-it
<5
< 2
OSC
68-5
<5
< 2
occ
< 5
< 2
Total Solids og/1
130
130
Dissolved
120
120
Suspended
6
5
150
110
Solids
120
no
Solids
It
5
130
lltO
mg/l
130
130
ng/1
5
5
120
120
no
no
6
it
-no
130
no
3
It
130
110
130
no
it
5
Sulfate os/1
13
15
13
15 -
12
15
15
15
lit
15
15
-------
UJ
co
TABLE 3
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Huron - Oscoda
- Parameter: Fecal Coliforai MF/100 ml
FWPCA, LHBO
Station: OSC Y-010
68-7
Date
Parameter: Total Solids mg/1
8-20 < 5
10-16 ' < 2
Date
8-20 lltO
10-16 110
Date
8-20 llfO
10-16 no
Date
8-20
10-16 2
Date
8-20 Ik
10-16 15
; 30
16
190
200
190
19P
' 6
5
12
Parameter: Dissolved Solids mg/1
Parameters Suspended Solids mg/1
Parameter: .Sulfate mg/1
-------
SCALE IN FEET
LAKE HURON BASIN OFFICE
LOCATION OF SAMPLING STATIONS
LOWER SAGINAW BAY
U.S. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
OREAT LAKES REOION QROS3E ILE, K.-ICHIOAN
-------
CO
VJI
Date
XlOO
X105
TABLE *
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Saginair River & Bay
Parameter: Temperature C
X110
H238
H2l*0
15.0
15.0
17.5
21.0
21.0
15.0
15-0
15-0
19-5
22.0
22.0
12.0
1U.5
15.0
20.0
21.0
22.0
12.0
12.5
13-5
17.0
19-5
20.5
15-0
12.5
13.0
17.0
19-5
20.0
11*. 5
12.5
13-0
17-0
19-5
20.0
15-0
11.5
12.0
17-0
20.0
20.0
1*.5
Parameter: pH S.U.
7.8
7.6
8.1
8.2
7.6
8.0
8.1*
7.8
7.7
7-7
7-7
1A
?.8
7.6
7.8
7-7
7.8
7.7
7.6
7.8
7.6
8.5
8.1*
8.5
8.5
8.5
7-9
8,6
8.6
8.2
8.2
8.1
8.5
8.2
8.1*
8.7
S.U -
8.3
8.2
8.5
8.2
8.5
8A
8.2
8.1
8.1
8.3
8.2
8.5
FWPCA, LHBO
Average
8.0
7-7
7-7
8.1*
8.3
8.1*
8.3
-------
Station:
Date
5-21
5-22
6-18
6-19
9-h
9-5
10-17
Average
Date
20.00
580
TABLE k
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
_. Saginaw River & Bay
Parameter: Conductivity umhos/cn.
XL05 XHO
H238
E2kO E2k2
820
800
530
1*70
770
kOO
300
8lO
730
860
770
980
950
870
780
660
760
1100
1100
1500
320
320
500
Wo
290
300
320
380
3'»0
.300. -
330
310
300
£$0
390
360
390
}J30
260
260
270
300
280
350
320
260
2^0
260
850 ' 970 360
Paraheter:
320 3^0
Chlorides mg/1
290
120
120
61
52
130
58
16
120
90
120
100
180
190
-
ito
91*
98
92
210
230
290
2k
2k
80
62
2k
32
21
31
29
29
30
27
28
12
36
37
^5
37
"15
16
13
19
23
31
27
lit
15
10
FtflPCA, LHBO
Average
80
130
160
38
27
28
20
-------
tjO
Average
Date
X100
TABLE If
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Saginaw River & Bay
Parameter: Phenols ug/1
30.05
\
nio
H238
H2lf2
k
8
2
5
if
if '
6
If
< 1
2
1*
3
.6
if
if
< i
l
3
3
if
< 1
if
< 1
< 1
2
3
^
1
1
< 1
< 1
1
2
2
2
1
< 1
< 1
< 1
2
3
2
2
< 1
< 1
< 1.
1,
1
321
Parameter: tin solved
If. 8
*-9
8.9
8.1
5.2
8.6
9-9
lf.7
5-3
' If.O
3-9
2.3
3-3
. 3.1
5-5
5.^
lt.6
lf.1
If.O
if.6
3.6
10.2
10.6
li.2
9..1
, 9-6
. 9-3
10.8
10.0
9.7
9^
8.5
8.9
7.8
10. If
9.8
10.1
9.8
8. If
8. It
8:6.
10.8
10.2
10.3
8.7
8.5
8.5
8.1f
10.9
FWPCA, LHBO
Average
7-2
.3.8
10.1
9.2
-------
5-21
5-22
6-18
6-19
9-U
9-5
10-17
XLOO
X105
TABLE h ' -
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Saginaw River & Bay
Parameter: Total Phosphates
X110
H238
.91
1.0
.U7
A3
.81
.37
.21
1.1
1.2
1.1
-95
. 1.7
-. -13
1.1
1.4
1.2
1^2
1.2
.13
1.6 '
.15
.11
.26 .
.26
.13
.20
.12
.19
.23
.20
.15
.17
.19
.10
.19
.16
.29
.2V
.15
.19
.11
'.08'
.06
.15
Y-15
.12
.19
.09
FUPCA, LHBO
Average
Date
.61
1.0
1-1
.18
.18
.19
.12
Parameter: Soluble Phosphates tns/1
.56
.60
.37
.36'
.56 .
.21
.05
.'66
75
.95
.91
l.U
i.l
.
58
.76
-93
91
.91
.96
1-3
.06
.05
.23
.22
.05
.07
.02
.07
..06'
.15
.13
.05
.06
.04
.08
'.06
.25
.19
.07
.10
.05
.Oh
.oh
' .12
.ih
.05
.09
.07
Average
.39
96
.91
.10
.08
.11
.08
-------
i
U)
Average
Date
XLOO
3
X105
. : TABLE -k
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Saginaw River & Bay.
Parameter: Nitrates mg/1
XL10 H238 ' H2l»0
H2l*2
18 ' .8 .2 --.. .1
Parameter: Ammonia mg/1
;.5
.6
.2 '
.3
.1*
.1
.2
5
. ' .8
7
: 1.2
.6
. .6
-9
.6
.8
.8
1.3
.6
-7
.9
< .1
.1
.7
.5
< .1'
< .1
.1
<..!
.1
< .1
.1
< .1
.1
"' .1
< .1
'<; .1
..-.i :
.3
< .1
< .1
< .1
.< .1
.1
<.'.!
.1
.1
< .1
< ..1
73
.72
.23
.21*
.76
30
.06
.70
.62 '
^76
.70
-1.0
1.2
- -.1.5.
.62
-65
.1*8
.-7*
1.2
1.2
1.6
.05
.10
.11
.10
.13
.17
< .05
.11
.06
.07.
.07.
.19 -
.21
.18
.05
' .13 .
' .08
.10
< .05
.19
.11
": .10
. .07
. .06
< .05
< .05
' ..13
.05
FWPCA, LHBO
Average
-.93
93
. .10
.13
.10
.07
-------
fr
O
TABLE 1*
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS-
Saginaw River & Bay
Parameter: Organic Nitrogen 1135/1
. . \ ' o-o FUPCA, LHBO
-Stations: 30.00 X105 X110 H238 H2^0 H2U2
Date
5-21
5-22
6-18
6-19
9-* *
9-5
10-17
Avera2a ..*3 - .52 ..53 .29 .27 .23
Parameter: Total Colifors. 1-IF/l'
Date
.12
.06
.65
37
75
.60
.M
< .05
.11
.31
.82
.7^
-75
.8fc
.18
.08
-.38
.67
72
-75
-91
< .05
< .05
33
< .05
.58
.61
39
< .05
< .05
31
31
.^3
50
.2U
.05
.11
.22
.kl
.16
-33
35
.09
< .05
.ito
< .05
31'
33
-.2?
5,8cc
^ 6, ooo
160
300
> 1,500-
200
150
'88,000
57,ooo
160,000
fc,ioo
-92,000
25,000
- 25,000
7,200
35,000
5,700
2^,000
38,000
56,000
og COO
30
' 2.
1 -
56
h
5
TO
3^0
130
10
350
180
h
80
220
6
2
18
6
5
20
26
6
18
50
8
2
< 10
Median 300 -pT.CCC: 3.V--- - 5- 130 6 < 10
-------
fr-
I-1
5-21
5-22
6-18
6-19
9-U
9-5
10-17
Median
Date
XLOO
TABLE h
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Saginaw River & Bay
Parameter: Fecal Coliform MF/100 ml
X105
X110
H238
H242 H243
410
870
24 ;
22
170
20
150
9,500
2,100
2,000
'. 790-
5,500-'
, .370
25,000
1,200
44o
- 980
2,300
' 2,800
6,200
36,000"
< 2
< 1
< 2
1
< 1
< 1
10
4
4
'< 2 .
< 2
< 2
< 1
80
. < 2
<'l
< 2
1
< 2
< 1
20
< 2
.< 2
< 2
4
< 2
< 1
10
Parameter: Total Solids mg/1
600
590 .
390
360
550
290
180
600
530
660
620
690
750
-
630
590
610'
590
770
850
980 ,
210
210
teb. .
380
190 :
190
180
250
2kO
230
250
210
'. 210
150
260
- 260
310
300-
170
180
150'
. 180
. .180
230
. 2to
170
160
]Ao
FWPCA, LHBO
Average
420
640
720
250
220
230
190
-------
-f
10
Average
Date
XLOO
hoa
33
26
21
29
32
16
18
TABLE h
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Saginaw River & Bay
Parameter: Dissolved Solids
X105
\
30.10
J/l
H238
H2l<0 H2U2
570
560
370
330 .
520
280
160
570
510
' 620
590
670
730
-
590
550
550
560
730
820
560
200
210
hoo
360
180
180
170
2^0
220
. 220.
230
200
190
ll(0 .
250
'260
300
280
160
170
150
170
180
210
220
150
'. 150
iko
620
680
2kO
Parameter:
210 220
spended Colids
170
32
26
35
3^
23
19
. -
37
39
60
3^
33
27
20
10
h
- 19
18
13
16
6
10.
20
18
21
1^
23
10
12
3
11
22 .
7
9
7
10
1
' " 13
13
2*f
18
6
FWPCA, IHBO
Average
25
28
36
12
17
10
12
-------
TABLE k
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Saginav River & Bay
Parameter: Sulfate mg/1
FWPCA, LHBO
X100 XL05 XL10 H238 E2kO E2.k2
65
63
^3
36
50
31 '
23
Average bk 69 73 30 25 27 21
65
66
69
63
68
73
79
65
68
68
6k
77
82
86
23
25
50
hi
22
25
23
29
27
2h
23
23
31
20
31
33
35
29
18
2k
20
21
21
2^
23
17
23
21
-------
TABLE k
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Eaginav River & Bay
Parameter: Tenroerature C
Sag. 1 Sag. 2 Sag. 3 Sag. 1* Sag. 5 Sag. 6
12.5
13.0
17.5
20.0
20.5
15-0
12.5
13.0
17.0
20.0
20.0
15.0
12.5
13-0
17-0
19-5
20.5
3A-5
12.5
ih.O
17.0
19.0
20.0
16.5
12.5
13.5
17.0
19.5
20.0
l?-5
12.5
12.0
17-0
19-5
20.0
I't.O
FTJPCA, LHBO
5-a
5-22
6-18
6-19
9*
9-5
10-17
8.6
8.1*
8.3
8.1*
8.7
8.1
8.1*
8.6
8.1*
8.3
8.1*
8.6
8.2
8.5
8.6
8.1*
8.3
8.1*
8.6
7.9
8.3
8.1*
8.3
8.1*
8.2
8.1*
7.9
8-3
8.1*'
8.1*
8.1*.
8.1*
8.2
8.1
8.5
8.5
8.2
_
8.0
8.3
8.0
8.5
Average
8.1*
8.1*
8.1*
8.3
8.3
8.3
-------
-e-
VI
Station:
Date
5-21
5-22
6-19
9-4
9-5
10-17
Average
Date
5-2L
5-22
6-18
6-19
9-5
10-17
Sa.'. 1
32
26
60
87
38
1*8
15
TABLE 4
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Sagina-w River & Bay
Parameter: Conductivity (vnnho.s/cm)
2 Sa/;. 3 Sag. 'U Sag.
360
350
46 0
640
360
380
300
380
340
390
350
270
280
290
330
330
390
350
410
400
270
44o
510
4oo
360
330
34o
400
370
330
470
410
350
320
320
340
300
_
300
250
270
260
330 350 ^00 . 370 290
Parameter: Chlorides mg/1
35
37
37
33
16
22
13
27 .
30
38
33
55
49
12
47
72
40
36
35
41
37
32
32
55
45
43
35
22
28
24
-
35
15
18
11
FWPCA, LHBO
Sag-. 6
Average
44
28
35
44
38
22
-------
-f
o\
Station:
Date
5-21
5-22
6-18
6-19
9-4
9-5
10-17
Average
Date
5-21
5-22
6-18
6-19
9-4
9-5
10-17
Sag. 1
TABLE 4
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Saginav River & Bay
Parameter: Phenol ug/1
Sag. 2 Sag. 3 Sag. 4 Sag. 5 Sag. 6
FUPCA, LHBO
1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
2
3
6
< i
1
< 1
1
2
3
9
2
< 1
< 1
- < 1
3
3
1
4
< 1
< l
< 1
3
3
2
< i
< i
< 1
< 1
2
3
3
1
< 1
2
< 1
2
3
Parameter: Dissolved Oxygen mg/1
10.0
10.3
9.6
8.9
9-l»
3.9
9-9
9-9
10.3
9-2
2.9
o.o
9.3
10.3
10.1
10. U
9-9
8.8
9.k
8.7
9.8
9-7
11.2
9.7
8.5
8.6',
9.1
9-7
10.1
10.8
10.1
9.0
8.1*
9.2
10.lt
9.9
10.0
9.1
8.4
8.6
8.7
10.7
Average
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.5
9-7
9.3
-------
Station:
Pate
TABLE U
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Saginav River & Bay
Parameter: Total Phosphates
Sag. 1 Sag. 2 Sag. 3 Sag. k Sag. 5 Sag. 6
FWPCA. IHBO
J)a t e
5-21
5-22
6-18
6-19
3-k
9-5
10-17
Ar/ora-o
.20
.16
.35
_
.21
.30 '
,16
.60
.19
.16
.21
_
. -. .13
.-llf
.11
.21
-
.17
.18
.26
_
.27
.30
.13'
.16
.29
.30
.23
25
57
.27
.11
.19
.13
.23
:20
h3
.11;
.18 '
,lV
.10
.16
.13
.16
.08
-.12
. Parameter: Soluble Phosphates 03/1
5-21
5-22
6-18
6-19
9_lf
9-5
10-17
>07
.06
. 3!).
. -52
.11
.18
.09
.07
.06
.19
.20
.10
.06
.Ok
.06 .
.06
.22
.16'
. .11
.13
.oh
.09
.11
.19
.11
.12
.h8
.16
' .05
.06
. .21
-.18
.09
.31
.05
'.06
.06.
.13
.12
.06
.05
.Oil
Average
.20
.10
.11
.18
.Ik
.07
-------
CO
Station:
Date
5-21
5-22
6-18
6-19
9-li
9-5
10-1T
Average
Date
5-21
5-22
6-18
6-19
9-*
9-5
10-17
TABLE b
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Saginav River & Bay
Parameter: nitrates Eg/1
Sag. 1 Sag. 2 Sag. 3 Sag. h Sag. 5 Sag. 6
< .1
.1
' .1
.1
< .1
< .1
" .1 . .1 -.1
Paraneter: Amonia Eg/1
< .1 '
< .1
.2
5
< .1
'< .1
.2
<
<
<
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
< .1
.1
< .1
.1
.1.
< .1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1.
.1
.1
< .1
-.2
1
.1
< .1
< .1
.2
.1
< .1
.3
.1
< .1
< .1
' .1
.1
.07 ,
.12
.13 :
.20
.Ik
.18
-13
< .05
.10
. -1*2
< .05
.05
.28
.10
.25
.05
< .05
.06
IT
.26
.10
. .22
. .oA
.06
.13
.22
31
.25
< .05
.08-
.05
.15
.42
.21
.10
.17
.III
.05
.. .05
.18
.11
.10
FWPCA, LHBO
Average
.15
.13
.19
.15
.11.
-------
. Station:
J)at;e
5-21
5-22
6-18
6-19.
9-4
9-5
10-17
Date
5-21
5-22
6-18
6-19
9-*»
9-5
10-17
TABLE k
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Saginaw River & Bay
Parameter: Organic Nitrogen ng/1
Sag. 1 Sag. 2 Sag. 3 Sag. It Sag. 5 Sag. 6
< .05
.05
37
. .96
72
3,200
< 10
50
62
' ''20
12
80
FWPCA. LHBO
< .05
.20
.38
.30
.-58
.1»0
.28
1,500
< 10
6
28
10
8
< 10
.08
.08
.1*6
.1*3
.26
.61
-36
33
200
350
20
36
12
100
90
.08
-.06
-54
37
.60
.63
-38
.38
Parameter:
1,600
80
10
12
2
5
2,800
< .05
< .05
.56
.05
.16
.61
.^3
.27
Total
220
6
20
18
2
2
1,600
.09
< .05
38
.10
.VT
.1*0.
.21
:.2h
Coliform
130
710,
12
: 2i»
. 70
.- lit
30
Iff/100 ml
Median
50
< 10
90
12
18
30
-------
VI
o
Station:
Median.
Date
TABLE *
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Saginav River & Bay
Parameter: Fecal Coliforn MF/100 ml
Sag. 1 Sag. 2 Sag. 3 Sag, h Sag. 5 Sag. 6
FtfPCA. LHBO
Date
5-21
5-22
6-18
6-19
9-5
10-17
. 50
.< 2
10
. < 2
2 .
' " 3. '
< 2
6"
. < 1
< 2
2
^
. -< 1.
; .":<2. .
< 2
^
. 3
< 2
< 2
. - 10 :
..." <-2
8
<!
< 1
< 2
2
-. 1
72 '
' Ij- '
< 2
< 1
< 1
2
. < 1
50
< 2
2
<.l
< 2
- < 2
< 1
< 2
<2
< 2
< 2
< 2
< 2
Parameter: Tctsi
- --..,- ^ c _ ,
5-21
5-22
6-18
6-19
9-**
9-5
10-17
2to
250
390
. 530
250
280
170 '
250
2oO
270
260
180
210
150
220
2^0
280
270
290
270
160
300
kOO
300
290
250
230
2*10
250
iko
330
260
250
170
220
200
2^0
190
210
ll*0
Average
300
230
250
290
200
-------
Station:
ate
5-21
5-22
6-18
9-5
10-17
Average
Date
5-21
5-22
6-18
6-19
9-1*
9-5
10-17
TABLE fc
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Saginav River & Bay
" Parameter: Dissolved Solids mg/1
Sag. 1 Sag. 2 Sag. 3 Sag, k Sag. 5 Sag. 6
210
200
220
170
200
290
FWPCA. LHBO
220
250 ' ,
370
510
240
270
150
250
260
260 .
250
170
210
llfO
. 200
230
260
2oO
' 280
250
140
280
i+io
280
270
230
210
230
pJlQ
pliQ
330
310
2.kQ
2l+0
'170
220 230 270 250 .190
Parameter: Suspended Solids tng/1
15-
1
25 -
25-.-
9
15
1^
7
2
13
' 13-
2
2
11
17
10
20
17
8
19
1^
17.
8
17
18
lit
13
8
13
5
13
17
17
8
5
7
5
21
'22
- 19
3
Average
15
15
11
13
-------
Station:
to
Average
TABLE k
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Saginaw River & Bay
Parameter: Sulfate mg/1
»
Sag. 1 Sag. 2 Sag. 3 Sag, h Sag. 5 Sag. 6
28
30
1*3
51
25
35
23
30
32
29
2U
20
26
21
19
27
28
29
1*0
38
20
31
1*5
29
30
29
35.
27
27
27
36
36
30
* 30
, 23
26
29
32
30
25.
21*
22
27
20
25
23
FUPCA, LHBO
< 2
< 2
Parameter: Fecal Coliform MF/100 ml
< 2
72
< 2
-------
FIGURE 6
LAKE HURON BASIN OFFICE
SAMPLING RANGES
ST. CLAIR RIVER
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
RCAT LAKES RE«ION OROS8C ILC.MICHIOAN
PORT HURON )// SARNIA
SCALE IN MILES
MT Clinton Klvit
CLEMENS
LAKE
5 r CLAIR
-------
TABLE 5 .
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
'-'-..' St. Clair River
Parameter: Temperature °C
. '.- ,," .-' .-':. .. FWPCA, LHBO
Range SR 13.7
Station:
Date
". -''-" " . SR 39.0" -'
P56
100
5.0
8.0
12.0
15.0
20.0
23-0
20.0
15-5
lo. ;o ".
P57
.700
h.o
7-5
. 11.5
15.0
20.0
23.0
.' 19-5
" 15.0
10.0
P58
'1000
If.C.
7-0
11.0
15.0
19". o
22.5
19.0
15.0
10.0
P59
lit oo
U.o'
7.0
10.5
Ih.0
19.0
22.5
19.0
'15.0
9.5
PoO .
1900
U 5
.6.5
' 10.5
Hi. 5
19.0
22.5
19-5
15.0
9-5
P30
100
.5.5
8.5
2A.O
. 15.0
20.0
23-0
19-5..
15.0
9-5
P31
800
". 3;5
. 7.0-
' 12.0
Ik.o
' 20.0
.-" 22.5 '
19-0
- 15-0
'- 9-5
P32
1500
: 4.0
7.0
- ' 10.0
ll*.0
19.0
- --22.0-
19.0
15-0
?o
Parameter: .Ccndtictivity viirhos/cn
220 . 210 210 220 2^0 210 200 200
7-23 220 220;- 220 220 2oO 210 210 210
Paraaster: Disnolved Oxygen tr\s/l
Date .
6-2p . 10.6 10.7 10.7 10.7 10A 10.7 10.7 11.2
7-23 9.2 9.1 , 9.2 9.k 9.3 9-0 9.2 9-1
-------
vn
Range SR 13.7
Station:
Date
5-6
6-h
6-25
7-23
8-20
9-16
10-16
11 -h
Average
Date
8
8
9-
6
9
8
11
8
8
8
6
6
8
6
7
6
7
8
7
TABLE 5
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Clair River
Parameter: Chloride mg/1
7
6
8
5
7
7
12
9
7
8
11
13
lU
9
8
12
15
15
12
12
16
9
17
15
21
ill
21
17
16
16
SR 39.0
P30
100
.6
6
6
6
6
6
8 ,
7
6
P31
800
7
6
7
5
6
5
8
6
6
Parameter: Phenol ug/1
7
6
6
6
5
9
7
6
FWPCA, LHBO
,5-6
6-l»
6-25
7-23
8-20
9-16
10-16
Average
1
< 1
1
3
3
2
3
1
2
1
< 1
3
7
2
2
17
1
h
< i
< i
2
1
3
3
2
1
2
< 1
lj
2
1
3
3
li
1
2
2
9
it
2
6
8
6
3
- 1
2
< 1
-------
Range SR 13-7
Station:
Hate
Average
Date'
I|-rl5
5-6'
6-h
6-25
7-23
8-20
9-16
10-16
.07
TABLE 5
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Clair River
Parameter: Total PO, n
/1
0*1 .Oil .05 . . .10' .Oil .06
-" ._" . Parameter: Total Sol. POi rag/1
P32
1500
.03.
.Oil
.Oil
.Oil
.06
;oii
.02
.Oil
;o8 " .
.08-
.06
.01
.03
-.bit .
.03
.03
.oil -
.06
.05
.08
. .02
-.02
.Oil
.07
.06
.06
.06
.06
.08
. .03
.10
. .11
.06
.18
.10
" .15
.03
.Oil
.03
.Oil
.03
.02
,03
.05
. .10
.03
.02
.02
.07
. .02
'. Clr
" .01
, .08
.21
.02
. 2l|
.03
.03
.11
.03-
.03
.07
.20
.08
.02
-.05-
.Oil
.05
.oh
.03
.07
.07
.12
< .01
.02
.02
.Oil
.03
.02 ."
.02
.02
.05
.OU
.02
.01
.03 -
.02
.02
.01
.03
.oii-
.03
.06
.02
.02
03
.03
.05
.05
.03
.02
. .08
< .01
.05
.09 .
.06
- .17
.08
.11
.01
-.02
.03
.Oil
. .03
.02
.02
.05
.07
.: .02
.02
.02
. ;o6
. : .02
.oh
.01
:'"- '.06 .
.19,
.01
. .22
' .01
.03
, .-09
' .02
.01
.06
.18
FWPCA, LHBO
Average
.05
03
.02
.Oil
.07
.03
.05
.07
-------
Range SR 13.T
Station:
Date
Average
DatQ
5-6
6-4
6-25
7-23
8-20
9-16
10-16
11-4
.2
TABLE 5
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Clair River
Parameter: Ilitrate src/l
SR 39-0
P56
100
.4"
.4
.2
.2
.2
.1
.1
.1
X,
P57
TOO
.4
.4
.3
.2
.2
.1
.2
.2
.1
P58
'1000
.5' -
.2
.2
.1
.2
.2
.1
. < .1
.1
P59
l4oo
.3
3-
.2
: '.3
.2
.2
. .1
.1
.1 '
PoO
1900
.3
.2
.3
.2
.2
.2
.2
< .1
". .1
P30
100
.4
.1
.4
'.2
.2.
.1
.1'
.1
.2
P31
800
: -5''
.2
"'3
.1
r. .:. .2:
' '. .1
.2
< .1
..1
P32
1500
'. .4
, .1
.3
..1
.2 .
.2 '
.2
.1
. .1.
.2 .2 .2 ' ..2 . .2
Parameter: Aramonia-N mg/1
.2
.2
.06
.12
.09
< .05
< .05
.14
< .05
.13
.18
.06
.08
< '.05
< .05
< .05
.13 '
.12
.19
.09
.05
.07 .
.08
< .05
< .05
.11
.18
.12
.10
.08
.14
< .05
< .05"
.06.
.11
. .19
.07
.13
.16
.12
.14
.11
< .05
.15
" .14 .
13
.18
.05
-.10
.09. :
.05
.05
.14
.15
.12
.14
.05
.07
.09
.0(5
< .05
.12
13
' .12
.10
< .05
. .15
.08
.07
< ."05
.18
.05
.10
.08
FWPCA, LHBO
.10
.09
.09
.10
-09
-------
Eange SR 13-7
Station:
Date
Average
Date
10-16
ll-ll
.12
TABLE 5 -
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Clair River
Parameter: Organic ITitrogen
P57
.700
. .05
.10.
'< .05
< .05
"< .05"
, .17
-. .11*
.10
.18
' P58
'1000
. .05
< .05
.06
. < .05
< .05.
'-.-.18 "
.15
.111
.21*
P59
lAoo
< .05
.10-
< .05
< .05 ;
. -IT
" .'..17
19
19 .
PoO
1900
< .05
.07
< .05
.' -
.bo
.19
.16 -
.19
.23.
. , SR 39-0
P30 P31
100
-.06
: .06
< .05
< .05
<. .05
.16
.17
.11 '
.21
800
< .05
.--: .06
:v.05 '
<".05
.<'.05
:;.i9
'.38.
V .1^
.21
P32
1500
- < .05
_, .09
.09
<..05
. < .05 .
.10'.
.18
.16
.18 .
..10 .11 -.12 ' ..11 .10 ,.13
Parameter: Total Coliforni MF/lOO.ml
.11
5,200
- 190
250 '
1,000
1,1*00
1,200
800
60
680
3,700
. 1*0-
; ' 60
280
2l*o.
216
; itoo
.300
230
260
25
. 10
1*70
15
500
800
3,6oo
600
170
10
60
. 1,300
2,100
.5,1*00
. 5,900
5,600
1,900
100
20
230
> 1*50
1*,000
5,200
.6,200
6,900
700
<1
< 1
< 1
3
> 260
12
< 10
< 10
< 10
'-
-------
vn
vo
TABLE 5
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Glair River
Parameter: Iron ng/1
FWPCA, LHBO
Range SR 13.7 .
Station:
Date
lf-15
5-6 .
6-U
6-25
7-23
8-20
^jjg-
10-16
n-v
Average .
P56
100
.If9
.25
.17.
.11
- .13 '
..28
.07
. -35
*Q2_''
. ' .21
P57
TOO
.29-
.19
.12
.16 .
.12
. .15 .
.27
.20
.Olf
, -17 .
P58
1000
:' - -
.26-
.18;
'.07
,.06
.09
-.11
.06
.10
.Olf
.11
P59
jjfOO
.08
.09
.06
'.Oh
.03
.08
.05
" .03
.02
: -05.
. ' Parameter:
Date
6-25
Date
" -
6-25
Date :
6-25
,
130
no
-
18
150
<
too
13
120
-
no
9
130
Parameter:
. 130
Parameter:
7
P6o
1900
.llf
.08 -
,09
' .08
.02
.13
.llf
.13
.Olf
' ..09
. SR 39.0 ' , '
P30
100
'
.06 .
,08
-.06
.07
.03
. .12
03
.36
.02
-.09
P31
800
: .07
.05
.02
.05
< .02
. .03
.02
-- ,32
< .02
-;U'07
P32
1500
»
'. .10
- ,52 ' -:-.
. ,03 - . . .- .
-.06 r ...
< .02 ' -:'
. .Oil' -
.05
. .52 .
.03 '
.15
Total Solids ng/1 . '.
i ' ' .
150
Dissolved
'
l!fO
Suspended
11
200.
Solids
200
Solids
6 "
;_.
' 220
ins/1
.-; 210
.
mg/l
8.
130
. .-.
'
120 - ...
-.,
3
-------
o\
o
TABLE 5 -
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Clair River
Parameter: Turbidity JCU
FtfPCA, LHBO
Range SR
Station:
Date
11-15
5-6. .
6-V
6-25
7-23
8-20
£-336"
10-16
11-k
13.7 :
P56
100
< 25:"
'- '
.h
3 '-.
' : .-
3
4
..2
-"3. . "
P57
.700
<25
- '3
3
_
- 3
k
3
3
P58
'1000
»
<25'
_
2
2
2
3
2
2
P59
ll*00
i
_ . v
2
2
-
2
2
2
2
FoO
1900
< 25
_
.2"
3
---
3
li
1
2"
SR 39-
P30
100
. ;
<25
2
,1
-
1
'.!'
1
.'8
,0
P31
800
<25
-. . _
9
8
.- : - - .
i
i
-." i
,7
P32
1500
< 25 -
- -
.8
. . 8 '
*
' 2 ' " "'''-.
.2
1 - .
1 : .
Average
-. 3
2
-------
Range SR 26=7
Station
Date
6-4
6-25
8-20
Date
6-4
6-25
8-20
Average
Date
6-4
6-25
8-20
Average
P44
100
12.0
14.5
23.0
10.0
12
8
8
7
P45
800
11.0
14.0
22.5
10.0
8
5
6
6
< 1
< 1
3
3
< 1
< l
3
2
TABLE 5
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Glair River
Parameter: Temperature C
P46*
1200
10,5
14.0
22.0
10.0
7
5
6
6
< 1
< 1
3
3
Ext.
2100
14.0
22.0
10.0
Ext, 2*
2400
14.5
22.5
10.0
Parameter: Chloride (mg/l)
5
12
9
5
29
18
69 17
Parameter: Phenol (ug/l)
< 1
2
3
< 1
5
6
FWPCA, LHBO
^Stations in Canadian Waters
-------
o\
ro
Range SR 26.7
Station:
Date
6-1*
6-25
8-20
11-1*
Median
Date
6-1*
6-25
8-20
11-1*
Average
Date
6-1*
Date
6-1*
Pl*l*
100
310
920
550
260
1*30
.12
.09
.22
.06
.12
1.1
3
PU5
800
1*
16
1*1
20
20
.11
.12
.13
.03
.09
.1*
3
TABLE 5
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
St. Glair River
Parameter: Total Coliform (MF/100 ml)
1200
.05
1600
li*
ll+O
20
20
iramete
.12
.06
.02
Ext. 1*
2100
18
120
31*
:r: Iron
.12
.08
.01*
Ext. 2*
21*00
80
70
110
80
(ng/1)
.09
.11*
.02
.07 .08 .08
Parameter: Nitrate (mg/l)
Parameter: Turbidity (JCU)
FHPCA, LHBO
^Stations in Canadian Waters
-------
f ( G U R £ 7
LOCATION OF SAMPLING STATIONS
LAKE ST. 'CLAIR
-------
TABLE 6
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake St. Clair
Parameter: Temperature C
, LHBO
Station:
Date
U-15
5-6
5-13
5-27
6-k
6-10
6-18
6-25
7-29
8-12
8-27
9-10
10-2
10-23
10-29
E6
-
. _
10.5
-
lU.O
_
_
-
20.0
_
21.0
18.5
-
-
9-0
'. E10 '
-
_
10.0
_
_
20.0
.
-
19.0
_
_
18.5
-
9-5
m6 '
_
_
11.0
_
_
22.0
lk.0
- .
21.5
22.0
22.0
20.0
17.0
12.5
8.0
Zi2
_
lk.0
_
_
25.0
-
-
21.0
_
_
19.0
-
-
6.0
P22
_
_
lU.O
. -
_
2J}.5
-
-
21.5
_
.
20.0 '
-
-
8.0
P23
1 -
_
_
-
_ ;
_
_
-
-
-
22.0
22.0
20.0
-
13-0
P25
6.0
6.0
8.5
_
10.0
22.5
_
lfc.0
19-0
_
_
18.5
.-
_
9-5
P27
i
6.0
7.0
11.0
13-0
_
19-5
_
17-5
20.0
_
18.5
-
-
9-0
F28
-
. .
-
-
-
15-5
-
-
21.0
21.0
20.0
17.0
,12-5
-------
TABLE 6
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake St. Glair
Parameter: chloride ns/1
FWPCA, LHBO
. Station: B6 ELO KL6 PI5 P22 P23 F25 P§7 P28
Date
5-27 - - - - . - - - 8 -
6-U ' 13 - - - - - 8 - '
Parameter: pH S.U.
Date
^ 6-10 - 8.3 8.6 8.5 9.0 - 8.5 7.8
Parameter: Sulfate mg/1
Date , ,
8-27 16 15 17 16 16 - 15 15
9-10 15 lU Ih Ik 17 - 16 1^
-------
TABLE 6 ,
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake St. Clair
Parameter: Phenol ug/1
FWPCA, LHBO
Station:
Date
5^
5-13
5-27 .
6-1*
6-10
6-18
6-25
7-29
8-12
8-27
9-10
10-2
10-23
10-29
BS -
- -
:
V
-
"
-
. -
I-. '
< i .
2
-
- .
< 1 "
ELO
» . -
3
3
. .' -
< 1
/ r-
< 1
2
-
<1
'EL6
-
1
.
< l
'
< 1 J
- ' -
2
2
-
-
<1
P15
:
< i
-
-
3
-
-
1
-
2
2
-
-
<1 .
-P22
2
-
"
3
-
- .
1
-
2
1.
-
-
<1
P23
2
-
-
-
-
.
- -
. -
. ' -"
'-''_
-
< 1
P25
'^J
' ' --
' -
- .
. k
. .-
-
2
-
2 '
'3-
\ :' -
- -
< 1.
pg
^
. -
-.
-
:' 3
-
. -
. 5
. ' -
1
. 1
-
< 1
P27 ' ' P28 '
Average
-------
o\
Station:
Date
TABLE 6
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake St. Clair
Parameter: Conductivity umhos/cm
B6
KLO
P15
-P22
4-15
5-6
5-13
5-27 :
6-k
6-10
6-18
6-25
7-29
8-12
8-27
9-10
10-2
10-23
10-29
-
-
220 220
- ' -
-
.''.. ''' 210
-
2^tQ ' 210
* f_
220 210
-
-
. -
- ' : -
-
-
210 2^0
,_
- . -
200 280
200
-
220 2kO
"-
200
-
'
-
-
-
-
300
-
-
300
-
-
2UO
-
-
-
-
P23
P25
230
220
220
210
220
FWPCA, LHBO
P2T P28 '
Average
230
210-
210
2*10
250
220
220
-------
TABLE 6
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake St. Clair :
Parameter: Dissolved Oxygen cg/l
FWPCA, LHBO
Station: - B5 ' ELO EUJ KL5 -P22 P23 P25 P27 P28 '
r
Date , -
5-f - II II I' I . I - -
5-13 - - -..-:._ - _
5-27 - - -,,'.- - ' -
6-k - - -: - - - - . -
6-10 : - n.9 13-8 10.3 13-3 - .11-3 11.2
6-18 ... _ _ _ _ ..-_._
00 7-29 - '-' - - --'..- - - -
8-12 - -._ _ __
8-27 ' 8-3 9-3 7-8 . 9.6 9-3. - .8.3 8.3
9-10 8.9 8.9 9.0 9-2 8.7 ' -" 8.9 9-1
. 10-2 - -.-'-
10-23 - -' - - - ---
10-29 10.6 10.6" 11.2- 11.^ "11.5 - 10.6 10.9
Average 9-3 10.2 10.5 10.1 10.7 - 9-9 9-9
-------
ON
VO
TABLE
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake St. Clair
Parameter: Total Phosphates PO,
mg/1
FWPCA, LHBO
Station:
Date
^-15
5-6 .
5-13
5-27
6-h
6-10
-6-18
6-25
7-29
8-12
8-27
9rlO
10-2
10-23
10-29
Average
E6
.02
-
.01*
-
-
it:'
'.oh
.10
-
.17'
.09 .
KLO
.02
_
_
.07
. _
_
.05
..05
.05
-
. «.
.07-
05
E*
.02
_
»
.
.07
.11
.33
.07
_
_
.38 ;
.16
EL5
~hl
*
«
52
.32
~69
. .13
-
n -
.17
37
-P22 P23 '
.60
mf
_
~ho I
_
_
.25
.29
.29
^
.15
33
P25
.10
.03
.03
.oh
-.08
.05
.07
.19
^ -
.07
.07
P27 P28 '
.05 , -
.03
.03
n
*^«i-
2.1
.10
.07
.06
~78 I
.37 -
-------
TABLE 6
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake St. Clair
Parameter: Soluble Phosphates r-~
FWPCA, LHBO
Station:
Date
4-15
5-6
5-13
5-27
6-4
6-10
6-18
6-25
7-29
8-12
8-27
9-10
10-2
10-23
10-29
Average
M-
-
-
.01
.03
-
.13.'
- ?
.02
;04
' - '
-
.03'
.04
ELO
-
-
.01
-
.06
-
~o4
r-
.03
.02
-
-
.03
.03
ELD
-
_
-
.01
-
-
.04
.04
.07
.30
.02
-
.27
.11
P15
-
33
.
-
. .42
-
.27
.63
.07
-
' -
.10.
.30
P22 ?23 .
- _
.49
. -
_ .' _
.20
-
.10
. .
.21
.22
- . _
'
..06
.21
P25 -
.01
.01
'.-01
-
.03
.05
-
" :04
-
.06
.01
-
-
.01
.04
P27 P28 '
< .01
.01
.02 -
--
_ _
2.0
-
.05
.OS
.03 - - .
- -
-
73
33
-------
TABLE 6
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake St. Clair
Parameter: nitrate HO -N mg/1
Station: E6
Date
5-f
5-13 ^
5-27 : . -
6-U . .2
6-10
6-18
6-25
7-29 -2'-
8-12
8-27 -1 -
9-10 -2
10-2
10-23
10-29 -2
Average 2
KLO
-3
' - -
-
.2
- '
-
; .2
- «-
.1
.2
-
- - '
.2.
2
''" -3 .
-_
- - '
.
.1
< .1
' " -
< .1
.2
-
-
.1 -
.2
P15 -P22 P23
- . .
.2 - .1 - '
.' - - ' -
-
.1 .1 -
_
-_
.1 < .1
: - -
.1 < .1
.1 _..--
- - .
- ' - - . -
.1 ' .1 -
' .1 .1
P25
r
' _
- ' -
M
.3
. .5
-5
-
.2
- :
.2
2
' -
.3
. .3'.-
P27
:
. -
/.-
-
.2
-
. -
.2
-
.2
< .1
-
-
.2
.2
FWPCA, LHBO
P27 P28 '
-------
TABLE 6
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake St. Clair
Parameter: Iron Eg/1
, LHBO
Station:
Date
4-15
5-6
5-13
5-27
6-4
6-10
6-18
6-25
7-29
8-12
8-27
9-10
10-2
10-23
10-29
Average
B6-
_
- -
.12
_
'" .. -°3
_
-
.11- '
- -
.20
30
-
' -
95'
.29
ELO
_
-
.11
«.
v
.12
w
- '
.18
» f
.16
.16
-
_
.29
.16
KL6
-
_
-
.09
.
.10
..
-
. -78 .
_
.22
.22
-
.18
.1*9 ;
.30
P15
M
- ' -
52
.38
- '
^;
"38 '
.. -38
-
_
.52
.43.
P22
^
_
'.66
^
31
_
-I1* .
..
.16
.16
H
' .37
.5^
P23 F25 .
: ' "
' - .47
.47-
- . Vl8
^ ^
- .11
.18
' .12 '
. - .31
- , . ~2h
.21
_ ' _
_
.13
. .2l'
P27 P28 '
.63
.12
.24
1-5
.12
.23
.31
.25
.25 -
_ _
.26
*
. -39
-------
to
TABLE 6
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake St. Glair
Parameter: Ammonia (KH -K) mg/1
FWPCA, LHBO
-Station:
Date
5-f .
"5-13
5-27
6-U
6-10
6-18
6-25
7-S9
8-12
8-27
9-10
10-2-
10-23
10-29
-.'':-'
mt
°T
-
.06
-
-.06.'
.12
.09
- .
. -
.07 "
EIO
; .06
.-.-'
; - -.
< .05
' -"
.-
< .05
. . ' r-
.06
.10
-
.08,
B6
.:
.08 .
-
- ...
< .05
-
-""'
<. .05
"-
.10
.10
. ' - "
-- .
.07 -
EL5 -P22
**.
.29. . .n
- -
-. '-.".
.06 . < .05
- . ' ' -
-..'-
.11 : .07
' - '-;" "
.10 .11*
.11 .11'
- -
- . « -;
.2JJ. -.65 .
P23 P25
- *
< ^05
_ ' _
' '
<..05
-" _
_.
< .05
> *
< ..05
- ' .11
.-.'-.
. - --'''
.06
P27
-
< .05
«..
< .05
«.
< .05
< .05
_
.07
.13
-
_
.07
P28 _;.
-
_
^
_
w
_
_
_
_
-
. -
-
-
Average
.08
.06
.07 .15 .19
-------
TABLE 6
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake St. Clair
Parameter: Organic-!! cg/1
Station:
Date
5-6
5-13
5-27
6-1*
6-10
6-18
6-25
7-29
8-12
8-27
9-10
10-2
10-23
10-29
< .05
.
-
-
.10-'
-
.25
.20
-
-
.25
KLO
~
.05
'
-
< .05 '
'
-
.05
r-
.11
.16
-
-
.17
*
.06 .
-
_
< .05
-
-
< .05
-
.28
.18
-
-
.38 -
EL5
< .05
'
_
.07
-
-
< .05
-
.62
.11
-
-
.22
P22
.11
-
_
< .05
-
-
<..05
- '
.60
.11
-
-
' .39
P23 P25 .. P27
r
- -
< V05 < .05
_ _
< .05 < .05
~ - _
< .05
< .05 .10
_ * - _
-.16 ; .Ik
-" .18 .20
- . ' -
- -
.16 .18
FWPCA, LHBO
P27 " ' P28 '
Average
.17
.10
.17
.19
.22
-------
VJ
TABLE 6
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake St. Glair '
Parameter: Turbidity JCU
FWPCA, LHBO
H-15
5-6
5-13
5-27 :
6-10
6-18
6-25
7-29
8-12
8-27
9-10
10-2
10-23
10-29
_
.3 . .
_
' -I.
_
_
2
i.
2
6- .
- ' '
- ' .
25*'
mm
.
2
'
5
_
3
. f-
2
^
. -
- -
7
_
H
2
J
_
k
_
3
2
-
' -
10
'
.
15
8
_
15 .
7
8
-
-.
20 .
'
'
15 ...... - .
'-'-_
9 - -V. ^
M
9 -^ . ~k
3 - 3
35 -' . >
- - ' . ' - .
_ - _
5 - 2
._
' -
' ^
' _ "
- .^
7
3
6
-
_
6
Average h k h 12 13
*Not Averaged
Station: E6 ELO El6 EL5 -P22 P23 P25 . P27 P28 '
Date . "'.'.'
-------
MICHIGAN
Ford
Turning
Basin
DT 14.6W
WYANDOTTE
Monguagon Cr. // \ «' 2
Gibraltar
Monitor
Intake
!DT 3.9
LAKE HURON BASIN OFFICE
SAMPLING RANGES
DETROIT RIVER
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
OREAT LAKES REGION OROSSE ILE, MICHIGAN
76
-------
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River FWPCA, LHBO
Parameter: Temperature (°C)
Range: 30.8W Range; DT 30. 7E
Station: R98 ELOO KL02 ELO^ EL06 EL09 KLH EL13
Ft. from W. Shore 100 300 500 1000 2500 500 850 980
Date
U-15 8.0 7.5 7.5 6.5 5-5 5-5 6.5 6.5
5-6 9.0 9.5 9-0 8.0 8.0 9.0 9-0 9.0
5-23 13.0 13.0 12.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.0 13.0
5-27 13.0 13.5 13.5 1^.0 14.0 1^.0 iM 14.0
6-18 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.0 17.5 17.5 17.0
6-28 17.0 16.5 16.5 16.0 16.0 - -
7-23 23.0 22.5 22.5 22.0 21.5 23.0 23.0 23.0
8-12 22.0 22.0 22.0 21.0 21.0 22.0 22.0 21.0
8-29 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.0 20.5 20.0
9-10 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
10-2 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.5
10-10 13.0 12.0 13.0 12.0 13.0 12.0 13.5 12.5
10-23 13.0 13.5 13-0 13-0 13-5 13.0 12.5 12.5
H-l* 8.5 8.5 9-5 9.5 8.5 7.5 7.5 7-5
11-6 8.5 8.5 8.5 10.0 9.0 8.0 8.0 8.0
H-19 5.0 5.5 5-5 5.5 fc-5 - ~
Parameter: Conductivity (umhos/cm)
[
7-23 230 230 220 220 220 250 260 250
-------
.Station:
Ft. from W.
Shore
Date
4-15
5-6
5-27
6-18
7-23
8-12'
9-10
10-2
10-23
11-4
Average
4-15
5-27
6-18
7-23
8-12
9-10
10-2
10-23
11-4
Range: 30.8w
R98
100
8
12
11
9
9
10
10
7
7
8
KLOO
300
8
13
12
9
9
9
9
7
8
8
R102
500*
8
* 9
13
9
9
8
9
r»
I
7
8
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Chlorides (ffig/l)
R104
1000
7
6
13
9
8
8
9
7
8
9
10
10
14
11
9
11
12
8
13
8
9 8 11
Parameter: Phenol (ug/l)
1
1
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
<1
1
1
<1
3
2
2
5
3
3
2
<1
<1
1
3
1
4
1
3
3
<1
<1
2
<1
3
1
2
6
3
5
1
2
1
<1
4
1
3
2
3
4
FKPCA, LHEO
Range; DT 30.7E
11
14
13
12
13
12
13
10
12
11
12
1
9
Rill
850
12
12
13
12
13
11
13
11
11
13
R113
980
11
11
14
10
13
11
14
12
12
14
12
1
1
12
3
l
l
6
3
3
2
2
1
2
2
4
4
2
2
1
2
3
Average
-------
VO
Range; DT 30.8w
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)
Station:
Ft. from W. Shore
Date
5-23
6-28
7-23
8-29
9-10
10-2
10-10
11-6
R98
100
11.7
8.9
7.4
9-1
9-3
9.3
11.7
12.1
R100
300
12.0
9.0
9.5
9.1
9.3
9.4
9.0
11.9
R102
500
12.0
9.1
8.6
8.7
9.0
9.5
9.9
10.5
R104
1000
11.0
9.2
8.5
8.5
8.9
9.4
10.0
10.4
R106
2500
7.9
9.2
8.4
8.7
8.8
9.3
9.8
10.7
Average
4-15
5-6
5-27
6-18
7-23
8-12
9-10
10-2
10-23
11-4
Average
10.9
9.9
9.9
9.7
9.5
9.1
9.4
Parameter: Total Phosphates PO, (mg/1)
.09
.27
.28
.12
.16
17
1.2
.06
.14
.07
.07
32
.46
.12
.13
.14
2.3
.11
.15
.12
.07
.17
.14
.11
.10
.10
2.5.
.03
.06
.06
.05
.24
.14
.11
.10
.07
2.9
.03
.11
.10
.03
.42
.27
.06
.07
.05
.12
.02
.14
.10
.26
39
33
39
.13
.09
FHPCAj LHBO
Range; DT 30.75
Kill R113
850 980
10.7 10.9
8.0
8.5
8.9
9.2
9.5
.1.0
7.6
8.6
8.7
9.1
9.6
11.2
7.8
8.6
9.1
9.1
9.8
11.2
9.4 9-5
.03
49*
.17
.09
.08
.07
.15
.05
.07
.09
.16
190*
.21
.08
.19
.11
.47
.05
.05
.14
.17
.39
.30
.06
1.0
.38
.12
.06
.06
.13
.16 .27
* Not Averaged
-------
CO
o
Range; DT H0.8W
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Total Sol. PO,
Station:
Ft. from W. Shore
Date
4-15
5-6
5-27
6-18
7-23
8-12
9-10
10-2
10-23
11-4
R98
100
.03
.16
.09
.09
.07
.12
1.0
.04
.08
.01
R100
300
.02
.24
36
.12
.07
.11
1.7
.10
.11
.05
R102
500
.03
.11
.ok
.09
.05
.07
1.0
.02
.02
.02
R104
1000
<.01
.22
.Oil-
.10
.05
.07
2.8
.02
.05
.05
R106
2500
<.01
.37
.08
.06
.03
.03
.06
.02
.10
.oh
Average
4-15
5-6
5-27
6-18
7-23
8-12
9-10
10-2
10-23
11-4
Average
* Not Averaged
.17 .29 .15 ' .34 .08
Parameter: Nitrates (mg/J.)
.4
!i
"i
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
. .4
.1
.1
<.l
.1
<.l
.1
.1
.4
.2
.1
.2
.1
.1
.1
-.1
3
2
2
,1
1
,2
2
,1
1
1
.4
.2
3
.2
.2
.2
.1
.1
<.l
.1
.2
.2
.2
FHPCA, LHEQ
Range; DT 30.7E
KL09 Bin R113
500 850 980
.4
.5
3
.4
5
.3
.1
.1
.1
.1
.03 .07
180* .11
.03 .08
.06 .05
.10 .80
.07 .34
.42 .06
.03 .03
.02 .02
.04 .03
.10 .16
6
6
2
3
5
3
,1
2
2
.8
.4
.2
.2
.5
.4
<:1
.1
.1
.3
-------
Range; DT 30.8w
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Ammonia (mg/l)
Station :
Ft. from W. Shore
uace
4-15
5-6
5-27
6-18
7-23
8-12
9-10
10-2
10-23
11-4
B98
100
.08
.13
.11
<.05
<.05
<.05
<.05
.15
<.05
.14
R100
300
.08
.08
.11
<.05
<.05
<.05
.08
33
.08
.12
R102
500
.07
.09
.12
.12
<.05
<.05
.12
<.05
.10
.11
R104
1000
.06
.09
<.05
<.05
<.05
.07
.08
-
.05
.08
KL06
2500
.12
.09
.10
<.05
.44
<.05
<.05
.12
.09
.10
Average
4-15
5-6
5-27
6-18
7-23
8-12
9-10
10-2
10-23
.10
.09
.06
.12
Parameter: Organic Nitrogen (mg/l)
.06
.06
.07
.10
.06
.29
.19
-
.19
.23
.05
.06
.06
<.05
<.05
<.05
.32
-
.19
.28
.05
.06
<.05
38
<.05
<.05
.19
.15
.10
.21
.05
.05
.09
.19
<.05
.33
.11
-
.19
.20
.05
.06
.11
.28
<.05
.12
.16
.13
.18
.21
FHPCA, LHBO
Range:
R109
500
.08.
.05
.12
<.05
<.05
<.05
IT
.16
<.05
.09
DT 30.
KLU
850
<.05
<.05
<.05
.05
.07
<.05
<.05
13
.n
.08
7W
KL13
980
<.05
.07
<.05
.06
<.05
<.05
.10
.15
.10
.07
.06
.14
<.05
.34
<.05
<.05
.22
.15
.13
.26
.09
.14
.10
.28
.12
.05
.18
.23
.19
.28
.18
.n
.10
.09
.16
.12
.25
.21
.17
.30
Average
.14
.12
13
.14
.14
.15
.17 .17
-------
oo
ro
Range; DT 30.8W
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Total Coliform (MF/100 ml)
Range:
Station :
Ft. from W. Shore
Date
4-15
5-6
5-27
6-18
7-23
8-12
9-10
10-23
11-4
R98
100
520
100
>l8o
150
52
920
170
300
50
R100
300
310
60
46
200
ho
390
ito
<100
20
KL02
500
70
10
1'J
26
1(0
23
30
ICO
10
R104
1000
60
-4:
j_i
to
20
19
100
<100
<10
R106
2500
60
4
8
6
13
-
10
'100
<10
Median
5-6
5-27
6-18
7-23
8-12
9-10
10-2
10-23
11-19
Average
170
<100
26
28
Parameter: Iron (
57
34
1.6
.29
.77-
.35
.44
.30
.30
.10
.38
57
.26
1.2
.34
.62
.35
-.39
13
.23
.12
31
.51
.28
1.1
.22
.46
.31
.26
.16
.19
.07
.52
.45
.28
1.2
23
.29
.35
35
.21
.43
.12
.56
31
.30
1.7
.16
.22
.18
.12
.06
.22
.16
53
.49
.41
37
.41
.36
to
.41
FWPCA, LHBO
DT 30.7S
Rill
850
R113
980
70 24,000
72 2, toO
830 65,000
30 20
15 150
22 >890
10 34,000
-------
TABLE 7 .
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS FHPCA, LHBO
. Detroit River ,
Parameter: Turbidity fj.C.U.)
Range; DT 30.8W . Range; DT 30-7E
00
CO
Station: R98 R100 R102 R104 R106 R109 Rill R113
Fb. from W. Shore 100 300 $00 1000 2500 500 850 9§0_
<25 <25 <25 28
3 5 68
Date
4-15
11-4
<25
3
< 25 < 25
4 3
-------
oo
-p-
Station: ' HI
Ft. from W. Shore 5
Date
4-4 8.0
5-1 12.0
5-20 12.5
6-11 22.5
6-28 18.5
7-10 13.5
7-18 24.0
8-6 23.0
8-28 22.5
8-29 21.0
7-10 13.5
9-11 20.0
9-23 20.5
10-10 14.0
10-21 ' 18.0
11-5 9-5
11-6 9.0
5-20 10.4
6-28 8.5
8-29 8.6
9-11 9-3
10-10 9.9
11-6 11.5
Average 9-7
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Temperature (°C)
Range: DT 20.6
R3
50
8.5
10.0
12.5
21.5
17.5
13-0
22.0
23.0
21.0
21.0
13.0
20.0
20.5
13-5
15.0
9-5
9.0
R5
200
7.5
9.0
12.5
21.0
17.0
16.0
21.0
23.0
21.0
-
16.0
20.0
20.5
12.5
15.0
9-5
9.0
R7
400
6.5
9.0
12.0
21.0
16.5
14.0
19.0
23.0
20.5
20.5
14.0
19.5
20.5
13.0
15.0
9.5
9.5
Parameter:
10.5
8.6
8.6
9.2
10.1
ll.l*
9.7
10.7
8.7
_
9.*
9.9
11.3
10.0
10.7
9.1
8.6
9.4
10.0
10.9
9.8
R9
600
6.0
8.5
12.0
21.0
16.5
14.0
19. c
22.5
20.5
20.5
i4.o
19.5
20.5
12.0
15.0
9-5
9.5
Dissolved
10.8
9.1
8.6
8,7
9-9
10.7
9.7
RIO
700
5-5
8.0
12.0
20.5
16.0
13.0
21.0
22.5
20.5
20.5
13.0
19.0
20.5
14.0
15-0
9.5
10.0
HL1
1000
5.5
8.0
12.0
20.5
16.5
IJ.o
19.5
22.5
20.5
20.5
13.0
19.0
20.0
12.0
15.0
9.5
9-5
Oxygen (mg/l)
10.7
9-1
8.7
8.6
10.0
10.7
9.6
10.6
9.0
8.5
8.6
10.0
10.6
9.6
FiJPCA, LHBO
R12
1500
5.0
8.0
12.0
19-5
1.6,5
13.0
17.0
22.0
-
20.5
13.0
19.0
20.0
13-5
14.0
9.5
9.5
10.5
8.9
8.7
8.5
7.7
10.6
KL3
1800
5-5
8.0
12.0
19.5
17-0
13.0
15.0
22.0
20.5
20.5
13.0
19.0
20.0
13.0
14.0
9.0
9.0
10.5
8.7
8.7
8.6
9.5
10.7
9.2 9.5
8.0
12.5
19.0
17.0
13-0
19.0
22.0
20.5
20.5
13.0
19.0
20.0
13-5
14.0
8.5
8.5
10.8
8.5
8.6
8.5
9-5
10.9
9-5
-------
o>
.Station :
Ft. from W. Shore
Date
5-1
5-20
6-11
6-28
7-10
T-18
8-6
8-28
8-29
7-10
9-11
9-23
10-10
10-21
11-5
11-6
5-20
6-28
8-29
9-11
10-10
11-6
5.0
8.5
12.0
18.5
13.5
18.0
22.0
21.0
20.5
13-5
19.5
20.5
13.0
14.0
8.0
8*0
10.3
8.6
8.5
9.*
ll.l
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Temperature (°C)
"Range: DT 20.6
FWPCA, LHBO
Parameter: Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)
Average
9.6
-------
co
a\
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Chloride (mg/l)
Range: DT 20.6
Station:
Ft. from W. Shore
Date
k-k
5-1
5-20
6-11
7-10
8-6
8-28
9-23
10-21
11-5
HL
5
16
9
8
10
8
9
8
9
9
8
R3
50
15
8
9
9
7
8
8
10
8
8
R5
200
13
8
8
10
8
o
8
T0
6
8
R7
too
10
8
10
8
8
8
10
9
8
R9
600
10
8
9
10
8
8
9
10
10
8
RIO
700
10
8
7
10
I
9
10
10
"8
Rll
1000
11
7
9
9
7
8
10
10
10
8
R12
1500
12
8
9
11
8
;>3
13
12
9
ra.3
1800
13
9
11
10
9
9
12
13
12
10
RlH
§29°,
15
9
11
11
9
10
13
13
11
9
Average
5-1
5-20
6-ll
7-10
8-6
8-28
9-23
10-21
11-5
5
2
7
2
3
3
2
15
1
7
2*
5
1
<1
5
2
1
1
2
3
4
<1
9
<1
k
3
-------
03
Station:
Ft. from W. Shore
Date
If -4
5-1
5-20
6-11
7-10
8-6
8-28
9-23
10-21
11-5
EL6
2300
13
10
11
10
10
10
13
13
11
16
Average
5-1
5-20
6-11
7-10
8-6
8-28
9-23
10-21
11-5
12
1
2
3
2
3
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Chloride (mg/l)
Range: DT 20.6
FWPCA, LHBO
Parameter: Phenols (ug/l)
Average
-------
CO
03
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Total Coliform (MF/100 ml)
Range: DT 20.6
UWPCA, LHBO
Station:
Pt. from W. Shore
Date
4-4
5-1
5-20
6-11
T-18
8-6
8-28
9-23
10-21
11-5
KL
5
>9,000
240
5,800
260
1,000
650
2,000
1,500
1*5,000
100
R3
50
> 11, 000
360
4,6oo
240
940
1,100
1,300
2,000
29,000
200
R5
200
20,000
500
3,300
230
1,000
550
7>!0
1,£CO
30,000
<100
RT
400
32,000
300
520
220
1,200
530
500
900
2,600
<100
. R9
600
>17,000
<100
60
310
210
no
30
1:00
<1CO
<100
RIO
TOO
12,000
<100
40
36
i4o
190
35
:loo
100
<100
KL1
1000
3,400
30
600
ho
50 .
38
34
100
2CO
<100
R12
1500
110
72
4
J;2
2J;0
.';0
-
1,2CO
<1CO
<1CO
R13
1800
1,600
5to
310
140
1,700
50
190
7, too
100
<100
RlH
2000
4,40-
2,800
5,000
2,400
31,000
4,600
1,000
10,100
3,600
900
Median
4-4
5-1
5-20
6-11
7-10
8-6
8-28
9-23
10-21
11-5
1,300 1,200
970
530
110
100
75
-------
OD
vo
Station :
Ft. from W. Shore
Date
k-k
5-1
5-20
6-11
7-18
8-6
8-28
9-23
10-21
ll~5
KL6
2300
53,ooo
5,800
k2f 000
1*9,000
52,000
29,000
28,000
77,000
36,000
1^,000
Median
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Total Coliform (MF/100 ml)
Eange; DT 20.6
FWPCA. LHBO
Parameter: Iron (mg/l)
5-1
5-20
6-11
7-10
8-6
8-28
9-23
10-21
11-5
1.1
.57
.25
.22
.2k
.51
.23
.29
.19
Average
.50
-------
VO
o
Station:
Ft. from W.
Shore
Date
4-22
5-1
5-20
5-27
5-28
6-5
6-11
6-27
7-10
7-18
7-30
8-6
8-7
8-28
8-29
9-11
9-19
9-23
10-10
10-21
10-29
11-5
21-6
11-18
9.0
7-5
11.0
3A.5
16.0
15.0
17.0
21.5
20.0
16.0
23.0
22.0
22
21
21.0
21.5
15.0
16.0
12.0
11.0
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Temperature (°C)
Range; DT 17.
R18
200
7-5
12.0
11.5
lU.5
15.0
15.0
16.0
21.5
19.0
15.5
20.0
22.0
23.0-
21.5
21.5
-
21.0
21.0
13.0
15.5
9.0
11.5
10.0
6.0
R19
too
6.5
10.0
10.0
12.5
J.h.0
13. l;
15.0
21.0
18.5
14.0
19-0
21.0
23.0
21.0
21.5
20.0
-
20.5
14.0
15.0
-
11.0
10.0
-
R21
800
7.0
10.5
9-5
12.5
lU.o
12.5
16.0
20.5
18.0
1^.0
19.0
21.0
23.0
21.5
21.0
. 20.0
21.5
20.5
13.0
15.0
8.5
10.5
9-5
5-5
R23
1200
6.0
9.5
8.5
12.5
1*1.0
12.0
16.0
:>0.5
18.0
13.0
16.0
21.0
23.0
21.0
21.0
20.0
-
20.5
13.5
1^.5
-
10.0
9.0
-
9.0
8.0
12.0
13.5
.i.2.5
15.0
'0.0
1.8.0
13.0
15.5
21.0
22.5
21.0
21.0
19.0
20.0
20.5
13-0
U.O
8.5
9.5
9-0
5.5
R26
1900
7.0
9.5
8.0
12.0
13-0
12.5
20.0
10. 0
12.0
16.0
22.5
21.0
21.0
20.5
12.5
9.0
9.0
FWPCA, LHBO
Range:
R29
too
6.0
8.5
12.0
18.5
18.0
20.0
22.5
21.0
21.0
19.5
20.5
13.5
3A.5
8.5
8.0
DT 17.
R30
700
5-5
8.5
1.2.0
19.0
18.0
13-5
20.0
22.5
21.0
20.5
19.5
20.5
13.0
U.O
8.5
8.0
OE
R31
900
6.c
9.5
13.0
22.0
18.0
13.5
20.0
23.0
2170
20.5
19.0
20.5
13.5
9.0
8.5
-------
vo
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Chloride (rag/1)
Range: DT 17. ^W
FWPCA, LHBO
Range; DT 1T»OB
Station:
Ft. from W. Shore
Date
k-h
5-1
5-20
6-11
7-10
8-6
8-7
8-28
9-23
10-21
11-5
R17
100
ifif
29
39
28
20
-
18
llf
17
11
16
R18
200
35
29
36
21
17
-
9
12
13
10
llf
R19
2tOO
26
20
21
11
lif
-
10
9
11
12
10
R21
800
17
17
13
12
12
-
10
12,
12
10
9
R23
1200
10
10
10
13
13
10
ll
12
10
9
R25
1600
12
8
10
12
10
-
10
11
11
11
9
R26
1900
12
7
11
12
9
-
9
12
13
10
10
R29
Uoo
13
9
12
^3
10
11
-
13
11
11
12
R30
700
18
10
12
33
20
lif
-
23
25
llf
20
R31
900
37
^5
2*f
11
1*6
29
-
35
28
U
52
Average
5-1
5-20
6-11
7-10
8-6
8-7
8-28
9-23
10-21
11-5
Average
20 llf 12 11 10
Parameter: Phenol (ug/l)
11
15
19
32
12
7
18
17
11
_
6
5
5
9
11
10
10
8
17
15
_
5
if
if
8
11
9
9
7
20
8
11
_
6
if
3
5
lif
9
7
9
5
19
13
_
7
.8
5
5
6
8
2
If
2
5
10
-
6
10
7
if
5
6
1
1
-------
VQ
ro
TABLE 7
'1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Total Colifonn (MF/100 nil)
Station:
Ft. from W.
Date
U-li
l*-22
5-1
5-20
5-27
5-28
6-5
6-11
7-18
7-30
8-6
8-7
8-28
9-19
9-23
10-21
10-29
11-5
11-18
Median
Shore
. 93
2
1
> 130
KL7
100
,000
-
,100
,800
,000>
320,000
5
5
> 120
5
31*0
600
260
1*8
6
73
,300
,100
,000>
,500
_
,000
,000
_
,000
,000
-
,800
-
,000
KL8
200
93,000
2,900
51*0
2,700
150,000>
1*30,000
5,100
1*30
160, ooo >
18,000
-
220,000
690,000
360,000
230,000
36,000
2,000
2,1(00
330,000
65,000
Range: DT
R19
1*00
15,000
1,200
300
1,1*00
120,000
320,000
3,700
670
210, 000 >
13,000
-
310,000
61*0,000 1
- > 1
370,000
21,000
-
1,600
-
15,000
R21
800
52,000
-
1*00
1,200
250,000
75,000
3,300
630
17. w
R23
1200
670
350'
130
1*30
R25
1600
120
_
5
25
68,000 > 15,000
6,1*00
3,900
700
230,000>100,000>
16,000
-
330,000
,100,000
,600,000
330,000
8,800
12,000
100
39,000
39,000
22,000
-
290,000
550,000
_
310,000
18,000
-
< 100
-
6,1*00
1,400
< 150
660
180,000
5,600
-
160,000
82,000
ll*0,000
100,000
2,800
< 1,000
< 100
300
1,1*00
R26
1900
6i*o
_
< 10
31
20,000
1,000
-
5lfO
59,ooo
1,100
-
82,000
280
-
1*,000
100
-
100
-
6l*o
FWPCA, LHBO
Range: 17. OE
R29
1*00
2,1*00
_
2,600
1,700
_
-
-
6,200
5,900
-
5,900
-
5,1*00
-
28,000
1*,800
-
60,000
-
5,700
R30
700
28,000
_
6,700
970
_
-
-
21,000
17,000
-
7,900
_
19,000
-
57,000
1*1,000
-
33,000
-
20,000
R31
900
*"""
77,000
_
30,000
2l*, 000
-
-
-
7,700
1*7,000
-
-
'-
1*9,000
-
130,000
1*3,000
-
52,000
1*7,000
Parameter: Fecal Colifora (MF/100 ill)
l*-22
6-5
7-30
Median
^
150
li*o
_
. 100
210
390
210
<100
ll*0
1*1*0
ll*0
120
1*30
-
< 10
170
350
170
_
37
100
-
_
-
50
-
_
-
-
-
_
-
-
-
- .
-
-
-
-------
vo
(JO
Station
Ft. from
Date
5-1
5-20
6-11
7-10
8-6
8-7
8-28
9-23
10-21
H-5
Average
5-20
6-27
8-29
9-11
10-10
11-6
Average
Shore
5.9
6.1*
8.6
7-7
3.0
3.5
1.1*
3.5
1.9
5-2
5-3
3-2
5-3
.38
1.6
.97
2.3
2.6
2.9
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Iron (mg/l)
Range: DT 17.1*W
R19
1*00
1.1
.81*
.63
30
.66
.39
.16
38
1.3
.1*7
R21
800
.80
.70
.63
23
97
.31
.61
.32
.69
.10
R23
1200
.26
.1*5
.92
.21*
.56
30
.21
.29
1.2
.07
.57
.21
.65
.20
.1*9
.30
.1*1
.23
77
.11
.99
[28
.20
.31*
.20
.22
.29
.78
.13
.62 .5!* .1*5 -39 .38
Parameter: Dissolved Oxygen (mg/1)
FWPCA, LHBO
Range:
R29
1*00
1.0
.75
53
.32
.1*0
.22
.29
.23
.93
.10
DT
R30
700
1.3
.81
.1*5
36
.3>*
.23
.29
.23
2.1*
.27
17. OE
R31
900
1.9
1.3
1.3
.19
.72
.36
.1*0
.35
.16
.25
.1}8 .67 .69
8.5
5-7
7-7
7.8
8.5
10.1
8.1
9.8
6.5
8.1
_
9.1*
10.7
8.9
10.0
6.6
7.6
8.1*
9-5
10.6
8.8
10.0
8.3
8.1*
8.6
9.1*
10.6
9.2
10.7
8.8
8.2
8.1*
9.1*
10.7
9.1*
10.1*
8.9
8.7
8.6
9-5
10.9
9-5
10.1*
8.6
8.6
-
9.8
n.o
9-7
10.5
8.6
8.7
8.6
9.6
10.9
9.5
10.5
8.5
8.5
8.5
9.6
11.1
9-5
10.2
8.3
8.6
8.7
9.0
11.2
9-3
-------
Station:
Ft. from W. Shore
Date
4-9 9-5
4-22 11.5
4-23 11.5
5-14 13.0
5-21 14.0
5-27 15-0
5-28 14.0
^ 6-4 15.5
6-5 16.5
6-26 20.0
7-15 23.0
7-30 21.0
8-7 24.0
8-29 22.5
9-3 20.5
9-11 21.0
9-19
9-25 21.5
10-10 l4.o
10-22 15-5
10-29
11-6 11.0
11-13 8.5
11-18
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Temperature (°C)
Range: DT 14.6U
R33
100
9.0
11.0
10.5
12.0
15.0
14.0
13.0
15.0
16.0
19.0
22.0
21.0
23.0
22.5
20.0
21.0
21.0
21.5
14.0
15-5
9.0
10.5
7.0
6.5
R34
200
9-0
-
-
12.5
13.0
-
-
14.5
19-0
22.5
21.0
23.0
22.0
20.0
20.0
-
21.0
13.0
15.5
-
10.0
6.5
_
R35
300
. 8.5
11.0
10.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
13.0
14.0
15-5
19.0
22.0
21.0
23.0
22.0 .
20.0
20.0
-
20.5
14.0
15.0
-
10.0
6.5
_
R3S
1*00
8.0
-
-
12.0
13-0
-
-
14.0
-
19.0
22.0
21.0
23.0
22.0
19-5
19-5
20.0
20.5
13.0
15.0
9.0
10.0
6.5
6.0
R40
1000
R42
2000
FWPCA, LHBO
R44
3000
8.0
-
_
12.0
13.0
-
-
14.0
-
19.0
22.0
21.0
23.0
22.0
19-5
19-5
20.0
20.5
13.0
15.0
9.0
10.0
6.5
6.0
8.0
10.0
10.0
11.0
13.0
13.5
13.0
14.0
15.5
19.0
22.0
22.0
23.0
22.0
19.5
19.5
-
20.5
13.5
14.5
-
10.0
6.5
-
8.0
10.0
10.0
11.5
13.0
13.5
12.5
14.0
15.0
19.0
22.0
22.0
23.0
22.0
19.5
19.5
21.5
20.5
13-0
14.5
8.5
10.0
6.5
5.5
7.5
-
_
11.5
13.0
-
-
l4.o
_
18.5
21.5
22.0
23.0
22.0
19.5
19.5
-
20.5
13-5
14.5
-
10.0
6.0
-
7.0
-
_
12.0
12.0
-
-
i4.o
-
18.0
21.5
20.5
22.5
21.5
19.5
19.5
-
20.5
13-0
14.5
-
9.0
6.0
-
-------
VQ
V/l
Station :
Ft. from W. Shore
Date
4-9
5-14
6-4
6-26
7-15
8-7
9-3
9-25
10-22
21-13
R32
20
72
40
75
90
22
49
18
95
26
41
Average
4-9
5-14
6-4
6-26
7-15
8-7
9-3
9-25
10-22
11-13
53
34
23
39
16
26
14
26
30
24
25
26
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Chlorides (mg/l)
Range: DT 14.6W
R34
200
3*
26
36
15
68
14
23
33
26
14
R35
300
30
19
11
15
34
10
27
24
14
9
R36
4oo
28
IT
13
14
10
9
10
17
11
10
29
19
14
21
14
12
12
11
10
9
11
10
8
12
Parameter: Phenol (ug/l)
12
7
3
6
14
1
4
.
5
15
11
6
4
4
15
4
5
4
7
16
9
5
3
4
16
5
3
4
6
18
9
7
14
3
16
6
4
4
8
12
11
4
4
5
14
4
5
4
7
12
R40
1000
18
13
10
13
10
10
10
10
12
9
12
R42
2000
10
12
10
11
10
10
9
10
11
8
FWPCA, LHBO
R44
3000
10
10
8
8
9
9
9
11
12
8
10
9
3
3
4
5
4
5
4
7
8
8
3
2
1
5
2
5
15
6
6
3
<1
3
11
6
3
3
5
4
3
1
<1
3
-------
Station:
Ft. from W. Shore
Date
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Dissolved Oxygen (ng/l)
Range; DT 14.6W
R33 R34 R35 R36 R38 R4o
100 200 . 300 400 800 1000
T7PCA, LHBO
5-21
6-26
8-29
9-11
10-10
Average
5-14
6-4
6-26
7-15
8-T
9-3
9-25
10-22
11-13
9.6
6.2
7.2
7.8
8.9
10.3
9.8
6.5
7.6
-
9.2
10.5
10.3
6.6
7.6
8.0
9.1
10.::
10.2
6.9
7.9
6.5
9.2
10.5
10.5
7.3
0.1
8.3
9.4
10.6
10.3
7.7
8.1
8.4
9.7
10.7
10.4
7.6
8.0
8.1
9.2
10.7
10.7
8.0
8.1
8.0
9.5
10.6
10.7
8.9
8.7
8.5
9.5
3.0.7
8.3
8.7
8.',
8.9
9.0
9.2
Parameter : Iron
9.0
9.2 9.5
1.5
1.0
1.2
2.2
1.7
.97
1.1
1.1
7^
.82
2.9
.93
1.3
2.1
.82
.58
.49
.57
.84
75
2.9
.83
1.1
2.0
.71
5*
.61
. -54
.81
.80
3.4
.92
1.1
1.6
.74
.43
.47
.50
.64
.83
3.6
.86
.75
1.5
53
32
.49
.44
57
.66
2.7
.50
.56
1.4
.5^
.30
.24
.41
.38
.65
1.5
.50
.48
1.1
.48
.37
.38
.32
.23
.63
1.0
.1:6
*5
l.l
.45
..41
.37
JM
.22
.60
1.1
. .45
38
.81
.29
.25
.22
.20
.15
.76
Averare
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
.97
.77
.60
,6l .46
-------
VO
-a
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Total Coliform (MF/100 ml)
Range; DT 14.6W
FWPCA, LHBO
Station :
Ft. from W.
Date
4-9
4-22
4-23
5-14
5-27
5-28
6-4
6-5
6-26
7-15
7-30
8-7
9-3
9-19
9-25
10-22
10-29
11-13
11-18
Median
4-22
4-23
6-5
7-30
R32
Shore 20
6,000
1,400
3,200
4,800
R33
100
3,100
1,800
6,900
5,100
580,000 630,000
620,000 400,000
54,000
37,000
760,000
230,000
17,000
630,000
530,000
-
560,000
34,ooo
-
6,300
-
46,000
<100
100
880
290
R34 R35
200 300
3,900 1,000
3,100
7,600
5,4oo 4,4oo
- >i6o,ooo
320,000
44, 000 40, 000 60, 000
4,900
710,000
160,000
17,000
500,000
500, ooo
530,000
370,000
22,000
3,000
13, ooo
120,000
44,000
20
80
280
290
3,300
640,000 460,000
250,000 210,000
16,000 13,000
430,000 430,000
R36
400
1,700
_
-
5,900
_
40,000
-
500,000
150, ooo
34,000
780,000
660,000 540,000 540,000
-
440,000 430,000
25,000 24,000
-
13,000 11,000
-
40,000 42,ooo
Parameter:
<10
60
300
370 380
460,000
290,000
32,000
6,000
5,100
180,000
95,000
R38 R40
800 1000
1,500 1,800
610 580
4,100 4,500
790 1,100
>140,000>120,000
190,000 78,000
39,000 31,000
2,200 1,200
> 1,000 > 1,000
240,000 170,000
20,000 23,000
R42
2000
100
_
-
1,300
«
-
7,600
-
290,000
290,000
22,000
R44
3000
700
_
-
320
_
_
860
-
11,000
73,000
6,800
670,000 600,000 540,000 430,000
310,000 310,000
540,000
410, 000 420, 000
19,000 23,000
2,000
3,000 1,300
49,000
20,000 23,000
250,000
-
330,000
22,000
-
<100
-
22,000
330,000
-
170,000
l,6oo
-
<100
'.
6,800
Fecal Coliform (MF/100 ml)
_
_
_
390
20 20
60 60
100 100
560 450
_
-
-
410
-
-
-
180
Median
200
180
80
80
-------
Station:
Ft. from W.
Shore
Date
4-23
5-27
5-28
7-30
9-19
10-29
11-18
4-23
5-27
5-28
7-30
9-19
10-29
11-18
Median
10.5
14.0
13-0
21.0
21.0
9-5
6.5
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Temperature (°C)
Range; DT 12.OW
R87
322
10.5
14.0
13.0
21.0
_
-
-
R88
1*90
10.5
13-5
13.0
21.0
21.0
9.0
5-5
R89
670
-
-
21.0
_
-
-
R90
880
10.5
14.0
13.0
21.0
21.0
8.5
5-5
FWPCA, LHBO
Paraneter: Total Coliform (MF/100 ml)
470 310 340 - 270
410,000 >130,000>190,000 - >94,000
390,000 370,000 500,000 - 470,000
17,000 28,000 26,000 28,000 35,000
710,000 - >i,100,ooo
<1,000 - <1,000 - 1,000
22,000 - 86,000 - 29,000
22,000 79,000 56,000 - 35,000
Parameter: Fecal Coliform (MF/100 ml)
4-23
9-19
30 20 20 - 30
71,000 - - -> 1,100,000
-------
vo
vo
Station:
Ft. from W. Shore:
Date
5-21
6-3
6-26
7-15
8-13
8-29
9-3
9-11
9-25
10-10
10-22
11-6
11-13
5-21
6-26
8-29
9-11
10-10
11-6
8.5
11.5
13.5
l*.0
19.0
2*.0
22.0
21.5
19.0
19.0
19.5
12.0
lU.O
9.0
5-5
7.7
8.2
8.6
10.4
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Temperature (°C)
Range: DT 9»3E
Rl*8
500
8.5
12.0
13.0
1*.0
19.0
23.5
22.0
22.0
19.0
19-5
19.5
13.0
9^5
5-5
R50
1200
8.5
12.0
13.0
lU.O
19.0
22.5
22.0
22.0
19.0
19-5
20.5
1*.0
9.*5
5-5
R52
2000
8.0
12.0
12.5
13.5
19.0
22.5
22.0
22.0
19.0
19-5
20.5
13.5
9^5
6.0
Parameter :
10.8
8.2
7.8
8.7
9.0
10.5
11.0
7.6
7-7
8.8
9.1
10.6
11.1
7.6
8.0
7.8
9.2
10.5
R5*
3000
8.0
12.0
12.5
13-5
19.0
22.5
22.0
22.0
19.0
19.5
20.5
13.0
9^0
6.0
Dissolved
12.1
7-7
7-9
7.2
9.3
10.8
R57
Uooo
7-5
12.0
12.5
13.0
18.5
21.5
22.0
22.0
19.0
19-5
20.0
12.5
9^5
6.0
R58
U500
7-5
12.0
12.5
13.0
18.5
21.5
22.0
22.0
19.0
19-5
20.0
13-5
9^0
6.0
Oxygen (mg/l)
11.6
7.9
8.5
8.1
9.6
10.8
11. k
8.6
8.5
8.3
10.0
11.1
FWPCA, LHBO
R59
lt80Q
7-5
11.5
13-0
lU.o
18.5
21.5
22.0
21.5
19.0
19-5
20.0
13.0
lU.O
8.5
5-5
12.3
8.6
8.9
8.1*
9.*
11.2
R60
5000
7.5
11.5
13.0
1*.0
18.5
22.0
22.0
22.0
19.0
19.0
20.0
1A.O
1*.0
8.5
5.5
11.7
8.5
8.8
8.7
9.3
11.5
7.5
11.5
13-5
1U.O
19.0
22.0
22.0
21.5
19.0
19.5
20.0
13.0
U.O
8.0
5.5
11.1
7.9
8.8
8.6
10.0
11.2
Average
9.3
9.2
9.1
9.0
9-2
9-7
9.8 9.8
9.6
-------
o
Station:
Ft. from W. Shore
Date
6-3
6-26
7-15
8-13
9-3
9-25
10-22
11-13
Average
6-3
6-26
7-15
8-13
9-3
9-25
10-22
11-13
200
13
3
3
1
6
3
1
3
3
5
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Chloride (mg/l)
Range: DT 9.3S
3000
R57
tooo
12 11 11 10 11
Parameter: Phenols (ug/l)
3
1
3
3
2
2
3
6
17
3
1
5
1
h
5
2
1
7
8
3
2
3
1
12
k
1
3
6
6
1
3
2
1
7
5
2
i|.
5
1*
1
12
1
1
8
h
k
3
5
3
1
1
11
1
2
2
3
2
28
LHBO
5000 5600
13
15
13
17
12
11
11
13
12
10
11
ll*
13
16
11
10
10
15
12
9
10
13
12
15
11
11
9
13
11
8
10
11
9
1-H
10
11
q
13
11
8
10
11
11
13
10
10
9
11
11
8
12
9
11
12
10
12
8
13
11
8
19
9
17
9
31
28
9
27
12
9
35
30
30
39
28
2'!-
33
37
29
19
32
28
15
3^
27
20
27
3^
35
30
2U
29
13
hi
17
17
23
2k-
27
20
23
2
1
3
8
1
2
5
3
3
1
<1
1
^6
1
l
k
2
<1
1
<1
3
11
1
1
<1
2
1
Average
-------
H
0
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Total Coliform (MF/100 ml)
Range: Dt 9.3E
Station :
Ft. from W. Shore
Date
4-9
5-14
6-3
6-2.6
7-15
8-13
9-3
9-25
10-22
11-13
R47
200
l,8oo
1,700
23,000
24,000
45,000
370,000
50,000
89,000
55,000
600
R48
500
1,200
84o
11,000
110,000
200,000
550,000
R50
1200
4oo
890
7,900
450,000
170,000
610,000
180,000 160,000
100,000
4i,ooo
900
R52
2000
900
94o
6,000
> 1,000
200,000
550,000
280,000
R54
3000
200
750
3,500
>20
100,000
460,000
180,000
660,000 630,000 450,000
44,000
500
41,000
200
27,000
100
R57
4ooo
300
280
830
> 1,000
51,000
7,600
99,000
110,000
6,000
100
R58
4500
1,800
690
1,100
56,000
4,200
9,600
3,700
19,000
1,100
< 100
R59
4800
4,800
4,900
5,700
16,000
5,500
19,000
30,000
10,000
7,600
-2,100
FWPCA, LHBO
R6o
5000
4,700
7,200
-
51,000
7,500
38,000
36,000
36,000
20,000
10,000
Ro2
5600
17,000
7,500
19,000
45,000
1,600
41,000
53,000
47,000
18,000
20,000
Median
4-9
5-14
6-3
6-26
7-15
8-13
9-3
9-25
10-22
11-13
Average
35,000 71,000 100,000 24,ooo 15,000 3,500
Parameter: Iron (mg/l)
2,800 6,fOO 20,000 20,000
.81
.67
55
.63
.28
.60
.29
.31
.47
.27
.76
.58
.58
.85
.63
.55
.36
.34
.36
.24
.76
.38
51
1.3
.54
.49
.41
.62
.30
.47
.67
.35
.40
1.4
.63
.49
33
.38
.23
.42
.81
.36
.36
1.1
32
.34
.35
.29
.15
.72
.93
.22
.33
.90
.26
.36
.10
.17
.10
1.1
1.3
33
.39
.60
.28
23
.21
.24
.16
1-3
1.6
.35
.47
.62
.28
.31
.27
.13
.21
.95
1.6
.33
.45
90
.33
.41
.43
.21
.13
1.2
1.7
.47
.71
4.1
.44
.58
.31
.16
.22
1.1
.49
53
58
.53
.48
.45
50
.52 .60
.98
-------
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Teriperature (°C)
Range; DT 8.7W FWPCA, LHBO
Station: E91 R92 R93 R94 R95 R96
Ft. from W. Shore §0 28_0_ 480 680 980 1240
Date
4-8
4-10
4-23
5-7
5-21
5-27
5-28
S 6-4
10 6-5
6-24
7-22
7-30
8-19
8-29
9-9
9-11
9-19
9-30
10-10
10-28
10-29
11-6
11-12
11-18
8.0
9.0
n.5
11.0
14.0
14.5
14.0
15.0
-
19.5
24.0
22.0
24.0
23.0
21.0
20.0
21.0
18.0
15.0
11.0
9.0
11.0
8.0
6.5
8.0
8.0
11.0
10.0
13-5
_
15.0
-
19.0
24.0
22.0
22.5
22.5
21.0
20.0
-
17.5
13.0
11.0
-
10.0
7-5
-
7.5
8.0
11.0
10.0
13-0
14.0
13.0
14.5
-
19.0
24.0
21.5
22.5
22.5
21.0
20.0
21.0
17-5
14.0
10.5
9.0
10.0
7.5
6.0
7.0
7.5
10.5
9.5
13.0
_
_
14.0
-
19.0
23.5
21.0
22.5
22.0
20.5
20.0
- .
17.5
13-0
10.5
-
10.0
7.5
- -
7.0
7.5
10.5
9.5
13.0
14.0
13-0
14.0
-
18.5
23.5
21.0
22.0
22.0
20.5
20.0
20.5
17.5
14.0
10.5
9.0
10.0
7.0
5-5
7.0
8.0
10.0
9.0
13.0
_
-
i4.o
15.0
18.5
23-5
21.0
22.5
22.0
. 20.5
19.5
-
17.0
13.0
10.5
-
10.0
6.5
-
-------
o
Station:
Fb. from W. Shore
Date
4-S
5-7
6-4
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-50
vv;8
'" '?
E91
80
62
52
90
44
41
43
39
49
43
Fx92
280
55
43
36
33
39
31
33
30
37
33
R93
480
&
29
21
r»
£6*
18
TI
"! tr
19
19
R94
680
24
22
14
n
l-r:-
12
12
10
12'
12
R95
980
19
18
13
12
13
10
11
o
C!
11
R96
1240
24
22
l4
16
16
11
11
10
i 4
9
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: chlorides (mg/l)
Hange; DT 8.JW . FWPCA, LHBO
51 37 23 15 13 14
Parameter: Conductivity (umhos/cm)
6-24 360 320 - 250 240 260
7-22 360 230 280 250 240 260
-------
O
Station :
Ft. from W
Date
4-8
5-7
6-4
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10-28
11-12
R91
'. Shore 80
39
48
41
47
160
^
44
68
76
52
Average
5-21
6-24
8-29
9-11
10-10
Average
7-22
62
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Phenols (ug/l)
Eange; DT 8.7W
9
10
9
2
8
17
24
11
WPCA, LHBO
R93
480
8
6
2
6
Q
4
2
7
24
12
R94
680
7
6
1
9
^
5
2
6
14
12
R95
980
6
4
1
11
7
4
2
4
7
8
5
4
8
3
2
6
8
13
8756
Parameter: Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)
9.2
7.7
6.7
7.6
8.4
9-5
9-3
8.3
7.3
7.9
9.0
10.3
10.0
8.5
7.5
8.1
9.1
10.6
10.0
8.6
7.7
8.3
9.3
10.6
10.1
8.8
8.0
8.4
9.4
10.6
10.7
8.8
7-7
8.2
9.3
10.6
8.2 8.7 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.2
Parameter: Nitrates (mg/l)
.3 .3 .2 .3 .3 .3
-------
TABLE
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Total Goliform (MF/100 ml)
Range: DT 8.717
H
O
vn
Station:
Ft. from W. Shore
Date
4-8
4-23
5-7
5-27
5-28
6-4
6-5
6-24
7-22
7-30
8-19
9-9
9-19
9-30
10-28
10-29
11-12
11-18
R91
80
72,000
3,700
4,200
320,000
420,000
5,4oo
-
680
.74,ooo
15,000
310,000
19,000
280,000
38,000
8,900
3,000
4,000
26,000
R92
280
4,700
100
2,100
_
_
2,700
_
4o,ooo
92,000
20,000
700,000
90,000
-
130,000
600
-
500
-
R93
48o
^" *~ "
4,500
100
2,700
520,000
520,000
8,000
_
54,000
120,000
45,000
1,200,000
4io,ooo
> 960,000
190,000
5,4oo
1,000
4oo
52,000
R94
680
" ^^"^~^
2,800
4oo
2,700
_
_
6,400
4o,ooo
150,000
58,000
1,300,000
620,000
_
290,000
3,800
-
200
-
R95
980
^^~^^»
1,300
280
3,500
> 130,000
560,000
6,700
_
38,000
_
51,000
1,000,000
530,000
1,100,000 .
180,000
1,800
2,000
4 oo
35,000
R96
1240
2,200
1,600
1,400
_
_
5,900
1,100
22,000
130,000
64,000
620,000
690,000
-
150,000
3,800
'
700
-
FWPCA, LHBO
Median
19,000 12,000 52,000 23,000
37,000
5,900
-------
Station: R91
Ft. from W. Shore 80
Date
4-23
6-5
4-8
5-7
6-4
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10-28
11-12
Average
7-22
.97
20
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Fecal Coliform (MF/100 ml)
Range; DT 8.7V/
1,200 <100 <100
40
20
Parameter: Iron (mg/i)
.86
15
.74
57
.45
l4o
50
1.4
.99
1.2
1.0
1.2
.98
.78
.62
.9^
.55
1.1*
.78
1.2
.96
1.0
72
.52
.7^
.92
.37
1.2
.82
1.1
.72
.76
.7*
.51
.43
.85
31
91
75
75
.60
.59
.48
.40
.33
.62
.25
.65
.40
.61
56
.72
.37
.31
.24
.47
.16
.56
.45
.59
.ko
.42
.99
.42
.36
.25
.22
.47
Parameter: Turbidity (j.C.U.)
20 15 15 8
FWPCA, LHBO
-------
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Temperature °C
Range; DT 3*9 (American)
H58 R69 R70 B71
4500 5500 6500 7500
R73
950Q
rWPCA, LHBO
H
9.5
9.5
14.5
15.0
20.5
24.0
23.5
23.5
22.0
21.0
17.0
15-5
11.0
11.0
8.5
8.0
9.0
13.5
l4.o
19.5
23.0
23.0
23.0
21.0
21.0
17.0
15.0
10.5
10.5
7.5
7.0
9.0
13.0
14.0
19.0
23.0
22.5
22.5
21.0
20.0
17.0
13.0
10.0
10.0
7.0
6.5
8.5
13-0
13-0
19.0
23=0
22.5
23.0
20.5
19.5
17.0
14.0
10.0
10.0
7.0
6.0
8.5
13.0
I3>o
19.0
23.0
23.0
23.0
.20.5
19.5
17.0
i4.o
9.5
10.0
6.5
6.0
8.0
12.5
13.0
19-0
23.0
£2.5
£2.0
20.0
19.5
1",0
14.0
9-5
10.0
6.5
6.0
8.0
12.;S
13.0
18,0
22.7
22.0
22-0
20.0
19, ~
IT/)
13.0
9.5
9.0
6.0
Parameter: Conductivity (umhos/cm)
6-24
7-22
340
340
310
280
250
250
240
240
250
240
250
240
230
240
-------
Station:
Ft. frooi W»
Shore
Date
4-8
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10-28
11-12
Average
4-8
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10-28
11-12
R66
2500
39
R67
3500
30
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Chlorides (mg/l)
Range: DT 3.9 (American)
R68 R69 RJO R71
4500 5500 6500 7500
53
37
40
37
39
35
37
27
1<6
39
53
18
. 35
30
24
25
31
13
32
37
40
19
16
14
16
15
28
10
23
21
27
10
15
13
14
12
25
10
15
14
23
9
15
14
13
11
19
10
11
11
12
9
14
14
15
10
1 Ji-
ll
10
10
10
19
11
10
n
8
12
10
9
9
20
16
Parameter:
14 12
Phenols (ug/l)
26
6
15
6
3
9
4
6
13
27
15
6
4
12
3
6
6
5
7
16
13
4
5
6
3
2
6
6
25
18
9
2
, 1
5
3
2
3
4
8
17
7
1
2
2
3
2
4
3
8
17
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
5
5
19
11
1
1
3
5
7
2
3
4
3
6
Fi.-PCA, LHBO
Average
12
8
-------
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter:Dissolved Oxygen Qag/l)
Range; DT 3-9 (American;
Station: ' R66 R67
Ft. from W. Shore 2500 3500
Date
4-8
5-21
6-24
7-22
8-29
9-11
10-9
Average 7-5 8.3 8.7
R70
6500
R73
9500
9.9
8.3
6.6
5-9
7.0
5-7
6.1
10.4
11.2
8.7
7.8
6.6
7.1
6.7
9.0
9.0
11.5
9.3
8.0
6.6
7.1
7.3
9.3
10.2
11.7
9.2
8.2
5-1
7.4
7.4
9-3
10.3
11.9
9.3
8.3
6.7
7.2
7.4
9.4
10.3
12.3
10.1
8.5
7.1
7.5
8.0
9.4
9.7
12.4
10.5
9.0
7.2
7.7
6.5
9.0
10.5
8.6
8.8
9-1
Parameter: Total Phosphates PO^ (ng/l)
4-8
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10-28
11-12
Average .85 .57 .53
* Not Averaged
.99
.69
.66
.88
50
.76
1.9
.54
75
.78
51
.47
.48
.47
.37
.40
.71
.24
.76
1.3
.48
.45
.44
.42
.-32
36
.80
.25
.63
1.1
.46
.18
.35
.31
.27
.25
.82
.24
.72
99
.45
.10
.42
.28
.32
.24
.60
.22
.84
1.3
.17
.10
.35
.24
.25
.21
.72
.25
57
*4.8
.11
.07
.18
.11
.18
.16
.60
.28
.30
*24.
-1*8
-29
.22
FWPCA, LHBO
-------
H
O
Station :
Ft. from W. Shore
Date
4-8
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10-28
11-12
R66
2500
.68
.47
.45
.88
39
.60
1.1
38
51
5*
167
3500
32
.19
.31
.42
.28
30
.57
.17-
.44
.96
Average
* Hot. Averaged
4-8
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10-28
11-12
.60 .40
.4
.2
.4
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.3
.3
.2
.1
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Total Sol. Phosphates POj, (mg/l)
Range: DT 3.9 (American)
R63
45QQ
.30
.26
.28
.36
.23
.28
.46
.16
.39
.75
.35
R69
550Q
.30
.09
.28
.25
.19
.19
.53
.15
.53
.71
.32
Parameter:
.4
3
.3
.1
.1
.2
.1
.1
.2
.2
.2
.4
.5
.1
.2
.2
.2
.1
.1
.2
R70
6500
.29
.02
.31
.25
.19
.17
.28
.14
.59
1.1
.33
Hitrates
.4
.4
.3
.1
.2
.2
.2
.1
.2
.1
R71
7500
.09
.02
.22
.18
.18
.rr
, ^4
.)6
.'.6
*4.8
.20
(mg/1)
.3
.2
3
.1
.2
.2
.1
.1
.1
.2
rvrpcA, LHBO
.09
<.01
.12
.09
.13
13
.44
.17
.19
*22.
.15
.4
.2
.2
.2
.2
.1
.1
.1
.2
Average
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
-------
Station:
Ft. From W.
Shore
Date
4-8
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
?~9
11-12
Average
4-8
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10-28
11-12
Average
* Not Averaged
66
5QQ
.57
.50
.72
.62
.43
"63
.44
.61
.69
R67
3500
.45
-
.38
.02
.22
.42
.45
.31
.49
.67
.57 .47
.24 .26
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Arnmonia-N (mg/l}
Range: DT 3.9 (American)
R69
55QQ
31
.15
.20
.27
.18
,28
.35
.21
.32
.42
RTO
6500
30
.10
.SI
.29
.11
95
-Xl-*
...o
.81
30
39
"RTI
7500
.14
.08
.20
.25
.13
.25
.31
.23
.24
.35
.47
.30
.30
.38
.16
35
.37
.29
.43
.47
.35 -27 -24 .22
Parameter: Organic-N (mg/l)
.28
.34
.26
.18
.16
.09
.OS
.05
.05
.15
.24
.21
.51
.11
.09
.10
.11
.12
.06
.58
.41
27
.30
.38
.13
.12
.20
<.05
.05
.62
.42
.29
37
.31
.07
.10
.30
31
<.05
.75
.34
.13
.40
31
_
.05
.33
.28
<.05
1.1
.34
.31
.29
.10
<.05
.13
.11
.14
.94
.42
.24
.25
.23
.10
.06
.32
.08
<.05
_
.28
.22
.24
.27
.06
.07
.36
<.05
.11
.71
.23
.16
*3-2
.24
.22
.FWPCA, LHBO
-------
I-1
H
ro
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Total Colifona (MF/100 ml)
Range: DT ^.9 (American)
Station :
Ft. from W,
Date
4-8
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10-28
11-12
R66
, Shore 2500
6, too
1,000
8,500
39,000
120,000
T9,000
90,000
170,000
2,200
800
R67
3500
1,1*00
3,300
80,000
29,000
98,000
390,000
120,000
260,000
too
2,500
B58
4500
i,too
1,800
-
68,000
88,oco
600,000
360,000
170,000
700
1,600
Ro9
5500
600
1,900
>l50,ooo
55,000
90,000
.»
':80,000
170,000
800
It, 800
H70
6500
700
730
15, ooo
!;S,COO
So, coo
86, coo
5 00, COO
180, coo
2,100
6,200
H71
7500
100,
24,
*9,
2CO,
k6c}
130,
3,
1,
300
780
coo
C"0
coo
coo
' CO
t ^f}
w'^W
900
500
B73
9500
1,800
770
8,100
6,300
28,000
39,oco
250,000
67,oco
1,600
2,700
Median
6-24
6-24
6-2h
24,ooo 55,000 68,000 55,000 27,000 37,000 7,200
Parameter: Total Solids (mg/l)
230 200
220 190
16 14
170 170 170 170 160
Parameter: Dissolved Solids (mg/l)
160 150 160 160 150
Parameter: Suspended Solids (mg/l)
8 13 14 14 18
FWPCA, LHBO
-------
Station
Ft. from W.
Shore
Date
4-8
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10-28
11-12
Average
6-24
7-22
R66
2500
1.4
15
15
l.l
10
10
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Iron (mg/l)
Range; DT 3.9 (American)
R68 R69 R70 R71
4500 5500 6500 7300
R73
9500
1.5
.86
1.5
.90
2.6
.97
3-0
1.1
1.1
.46
1.1
51
.85
TO
.2.4
.72
2.0
.65
1.3
.58
1.0
.37
1.1
.41
1.6
.66
2.0
.53
.98
.49
.94
.24
.71
.60
1.4
.53
1.7
.48
.88
.41
.81
.27
.49
.65
2.4
.46
1.7
.43
1.0
.26
.55
.23
.64
.66
3-5
.48
2.1
.58
.71
.28
56
.24
.38
.48
1.6
.43
l.l
53
.52
.19
.91 .79 .85 .97 .60
Parameter: Turbidity (j.C.U.)
10
10
10
10
10
15
15
15
15
10
FWPCA. LHBO
-------
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Temperature (°C)
Range: DT 3.9 (Canadian) L'TPCA, LHBO
Station: R75
Ft. from W. Shore 11,500
Date
U-8 6.0
5-7 . 8.0
5-21 12.5
6-3 13-5
6-2k 18.0
7-9
7-15 .
7-22 22.5
8-19 22.0
8-29 21.5
9-9 20.0
9-11 19.0
9-30 17-0
10-9 ' 13-5
10-28 9.5
11-6 9-0
11-12 6.0
6-2h 220
7-22 2to
R77
13,500
6.0
8.5
12.5
1^.0
18.0
20.0
22.5
22.5
22.0
22.0
20.0
19.0
17.0
13-0
9-5
9.0
6.0
R79
15,000
6.0
8.5
12.0
13.0
18.0
-
-
22.5
22.0
21.5
20.0
18.0
17.0
13-5
9.5
9.0
6.5
R8l
R82
16,500 17,500
6.5
8.5
12.5
13.0
18.0
-
-
22.5
22.0
21.5
20.0
19.0
17.0
13.0
9-5
8.5
6.5
Parameter:
220
2to
230
2to
260
2to
6.0
9.0
12.5
13.0
18.0
~
-
22.5
22.0
21.5
20.0
19.5
17.0
13.0
9-5
8.5
6.0
R83
18,500
7.0
9.0
12.0
13-5
18.5
-
-
^2.5
22.0
22.0
20.0
19.5
17.0
13.0
8.5
8.0
6.0
R81;
19,000
7.0
9.5
12.0
lU.O
19.0
-
-
23-0
22.0
22.0
£0.0
19.5
17-0
lU.O
8.0
8.0 .
6.0
R85
19,300
7.0
8.5
12.5
14.0
19.0
-
-
23.0
22.5
22.0
20.0
19-5
17.0
13.0
7-5
8.0
6.0
Conductivity (uinhos/cm)
310
280
320
300
1*00
360
too
too
-------
H
H
VJl
Station:
' Ft. from W. Shore
Date
4-8
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10 -PO
11-12
R75
11,500
11
9
11
9
11
8
10
9
9
8
Average
4-8
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10-28
11-12
10
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Chlorides (mg/l)
Range; DT 3.9 (Canadian)
R77
13,500
11
11
11
9
11
8
10
10
10
9
10
RT9
15,000
11
13
11
9
11
8
.11
11
10
8
R8l
16,500
23
22
15
18
15
IT
11
2k
28
19
R82
17,500
28
24
22
33
26
25
21
27
35
20
R83
18,500
33
32
19
38
30
37
28
45
-42
26
R84
19,000
40
1)2
21
61
53
62
47
51
61
39
R85
19,300
39
44
38
12
. 62
.16
57
47
58
44
10 19 26 33
Parameter: Phenols (ug/l)
.42
1
1
1
3
7
1
4
3
4
6
<1
<1
3
3
7
<1
4
5
4
4
1
<1
3
3
7
<1
3
3
3
2
< i
<1
1
2
2
1
3
3
3
3
<1
<1
<1
4
6
1
3
5
4
2
1
<1
1
2
7
3
1
3
4
6
2
1
2
5
5
1
2
-
3
3
1
2
4
3
6
1
5
3
4
9
FWPCA. LHBO
Average
-------
H
M
cr\
Station:
Ft. from W.
Shore
Date
4-8
5-21
6-24
7-22
8-29
9-11
10-9
11-6
Average
4-8
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10-28
11-12
R75
11,500
12.4
10.6
8.9
7-5
7.6
9.2
10.4
9.5
.11
.05
.24
.08
.18
.14
.38
30
.26
*1.3
Average .19
* Not included in average
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)
Range; DT 3.9 (Canadian)
R7T
13,500
12.5
11.4
9.3
8.4
8.9
9-2
9.6
9.9
R79
15,000
12. U
10.6
'9-3
8.2
8.5
T-3
9-3
11.0
9.6
E8l
16,500
12.3
11.7
9.3
8.4
8.T
6.5
10.
10.9
9.8
R82
17,500
12.2
11.1
9.2
3.0
3.6
3.4
9.8
11.1
9.8
R83
18,500
12.1
10.9
9-1
0.0
(3.6
0.4
9-7
M.I
9-7
Parameter: Total Phosphates PO.
.13
.21
.13
.08
.14
.13
.24
.12
.43
*1.3
.13
.12
.11
. .06
.08
.08
.21
.10
*2.4
*.65
.18
.11
.07
.05
.07
.07
.28
.16
*.53
*.99
.20
.15
.09
.06
.07
.08
.56
.09
.51
*1.4
.22
.16
.18
.05
.07
.09 ,
.15
.11
*.86
*l.o
R84
19,000
12.0
10.5
9-1
8.1
8.5
8.2
9-6
11.0
9.6
(ng/l)
.24
.19
.11
.10
.57
.07
50
.16
.47
*2.7
R85
19,300
12.0
10.8
9.1
.
Q.O
<>.5
9.8
11.1
10.0
.26
.19
.15
.08
.11
.07
.37
.15
57
.21
.18
.11
.12
.20
.13
.27
.22
FKPCA, LHBO
-------
Station :
Fb. from W. Shore
Date
4-3
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
*"* O
; "9
o..*>0
' .,"',-0.
w*
.L1-.V2
R75
11,500
.05
<.01
.15
.08
.12
.11
.24
.23
.19
""-1.2
Average .13
* Hot included in average
4-8
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10-28
11-12
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Total Soluble
Range: DT 3.9 (Canadian)
R77
.06
.03
.09
.08
.13
.11
.16
.08
"1.2
.12
R79
15,000
.07
.02
.07
.05
.05
.03
.15
.05
"21
".58
.07
R8l
16,500
.08
.03
.05
.05
.05
.07
.20
.11
#.43
=-.90 '
.08
R82
17,500
.09
.04
.04
.05
.05
.06
.54
.05
- .36
-1.3
.14
R83
18,500
.10
.05
.07
.05
.06
.06
.07
.05
-.71
-"-.92
.07
R84
19,000
.12
,C5
.c5
.05
55
.04
.48
,n
.18
'"-h
.18
R85
19,_300
.11
.05
.03
.c5
.03
,c6
.34
.05
.27
.09
.12
Parameter: Nitrate (mg/l)
.3
.4
.3
.2
.3
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.2
.5
3
.2
.4
.2
.1
.1
.1
.2
3
.5
.2
.2
.4
.2
.2
.1
.2
.1
.5
.7
.3
.3
.3
.2
.1
.1
.1
.2
.5
.6
.4
.2
.4
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.7
.7
.4
3
.4
.2
.1
.1
.1
.2
.8
5
.3
.2
.4
.2
.1
.1
.3
.2
.8
5
.4
.2
.4
.2
.1
.2
.4
.2
F/rPCA, LHBO
Average
.2
.2
.3
.3
3
3
-------
OD
Station :
Ffc. from 17. Shore
Date
4-8
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10-29
11-12
R75
11,500
.22
< .05
<.05
<.05
.18
.20
.15
.14
.06
Average
4-8
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10-28
11-12
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Ammonia-N (mg/l)
Range: DT 3.9 (Canadian)
R77 B79 R8l R82 R&3
13,500 15,000 16,500 17,500 18,500
.22
.09
< .Op
<.05
<.05
.18
.20
.15
.14
.06
.14
<.05
.07
<.05
<.05
.17
.10
.24
.13
.06
.09
<.05
.07
<.G-j
.12
..IT
.15
.08
.10
.10
.05
<.0p
<.05
<.05
.12
<.05
.12
.14
<.05
.17
<.05
.08
<.05
t.05
.12
.07
.13
.18
<.05
.10
<.05
.08
.22
-:.05
.23
.14
.18
.22
.19
.18
.11
-
.24
.09
.27
.13
.22
.17
.7.7
.11
.12
<.C5
.10
.cS
.23
.20
.19
.16
.21
.12 .10 .09 .08 .10 .1^
Parameter: Organic-N (mg/l)
.18
.14
11
07
20
05
18
80
21
17
22
13
.05
<.05
.08
.07
.06
.79
.28
.32
.26
.13
.10
<.05
.08
<.05
.05
.54
33
.22
.23
.20
_
<.05
<.05
<.05
<.05
.80
.14
.20
.22
.21
.07
<.05
<.05
<.05
.10
.30
.23
.24
.26
.21
.08
<.05
-'.05
.18
<.05
.26
.18
.26
.28
.27
.10
.07
-
.05
.10
.29
.26
.28
.31
.25
.06
<.05
.08
.08
<.05
31
.32
.31
.41
.37
FTJPCA, LHBO
Average
.21
.21
.19
.20
.16
.IT
.19
.20
-------
I-1
H
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Total Coliform (MF/100 ml)
Range; DT 3.9 (Canadian)
Median
6-24
6-24
6-24
3;TOO 3,300 5,000 3,100 8,100 10,000 15,000 20,000
Parameter: Total Solids (mg/l)
150 150 150 170 210 220 280 290
Parameter: Dissolved Solids (mg/l)
140 140 140 160 200 210 260 270
11
Parameter: Suspended Solids (mg/l)
8 ll 16 11 14
FUPCA, LHBO
Station:
Ft. from W.
Date
4-8
5-T
6~3
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-16
9-30
10-28
11-12
R75
Shore 11, 500
200
46o
4,500
3,700
17,000
-
200,000
-
41,000
l,too
600
R77
13,500
200
180
2,400
4,200
24, 000
12,000
90,000
-
73,000
l,6oo
1,000
H79
15,000
<1
560
5,500
4,4oo
10,000
72,000
60, coo
-
14,000
1,000
1,500
R81
16,500
1,800
2,200
2,700
2,700
1,900
6,4oo
54,000
-
12,000
23,000
3,500
R82
17,500
4,700
8,400
6,300
7,800
4,700
9,500
5,900
-
32,000
25,000
18,000
R83
18,500
4,100
11,000
7,800
9,4oo
5,200
9,4oo
29,000
-
28,000
29,000
20,000
R84
19,000
4,700
l4,ooo
21,000
<1CO
> l,iOO
>7,000
120,000
530,000
39,000
25,000
15,000
f _
R85
19,300
3,900
9,000
7,100
20,000
42,000
8,000
67,000
170,000
44,000
18,000
20,000
14
-------
TABLE 7
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River
Parameter: Iron (ing/l)
Range; DT 3.9 (Canadian)
Average
.45
.58
-58
.56
.56
.61
.84
* Not included in average
Parameter: Turbidity (j.C.U.)
6-24
7-22
7
10
8
15
6
6
7
10
8
6
8
8
9
20
Station :
Ft. from \J. Shore
Date
4-8
5-7
6-3
6-24
7-22
8-19
9-9
9-30
10-28
11-12
R75
11,500
52
.22
.26
.34
.66
51
1.0
.43
.39
.17
R77
13,500
.69
.78
.25
.36
1.1
.50
1.3
.28
.42'
.14
R79
15,000
.93
.64
.25
.31
*3-3
.25
1.4
.63
.63
.21
R8l
16,500
1-5
53
31
.35
1.3
.23
.21
.21
.50
.39
R82
17,500
1.5
.75
.36
.34
.75
35
.26
.30
.68
.33
R83
18,500
1.7
.93
.51
.26
.43
.24
.£9
o9
.99
.36
R84
19,000
1.7
l.l
54
.31
^57
.56
.95
.42
1.8
.45
R85
19,300
1.7
1.1
.62
.39
1.4
.15
1.2
.60
1.8
i
.45
.94
15
25
, LHBO
-------
FIGURE 9
LEGEND
MICHIGAN
INDUSTRIAL OUTFALLS (U.S.)
PUBLIC UTILITY OUTFALLS
INDUSTRIAL OUTFALLS (CAN.)
DETROIT EDISON
UNITED STATES RUBBER C0./i\
ANACONDA - AMERICAN
CO.
REVERE COPPER AND
BRASS INCORPORATED
PLASTIC DIVISION
ALLIED CHEMICAL CORR
PEERLESS CEMENT
FORD MOTOR CO.
DARLING a CO^j.
SCOTT PAPER CO.
GENERAL CHEMICAL OIV.
ALLIED CHEMICAL CORR
GREAT LAKES STEEL CORP.
HOT STRIP MILL
DANA CORP./'
GREAT LAKES STEEL CORR
ECORSE MILL
WYANDOTTE CHEMICAL
NORTH SIDE WORKS
WYANDOTTE CHEMICAL CORP.
SOUTH SIDE WORKS
PENNSALT CHEMICALS,
CORP. E.8 W.
FIRESTONE TIRE 8 RUBBER CO.
FIRESTONE STEEL PRODUCTS DIV.
McLOUTH STEEL CORP.
TRENTON PLANT
MOBIL OIL CO
CHRYSLER CORP.
TRENTON ENGINE PLANT
HIRAM WALKER 8 SONS LTD.
.©MISTERSKY POWER STA.
DETROIT EDISON
DELRAY PLANT
PARK DAVIS B CO.
BRASS
MOTOR CO.
OF CANADA
INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS DIV.
ALLIED CHEMICAL CORP.
SEMET - SOLVAY DIV.
ALLIED CHEMICAL CORP.
E.I. du PONT
INDUSTRIAL 8
"' MONSANTO CHEMICAL^
CO.
TRENTON RESINS
CORR
CHRYSLER CORP.
CHEMICAL PRODUCTS DIV.
McLOUTH STEEL CORP.
GIBRALTAR PLANT
GREAT LAKES STEEL CORR
^ BLAST FURNACE DIV.
.CANADA SALT CO. LTD.
INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS DIV.
DALLIED CHEMICAL CORP.
PLANT
de NEMOURS a CO. INC.
BIOCHEMICALS DEPT.
WYANDOTTE CHEMICALS
ONTARIO
,-. WYANDOTTE
^MUNICIPAL PLANT
SCALE IN MILES
DETROIT
EDISON
CHANNEL
TRENTON
ALLIED CHEMICAL OF CANADA LTD.
CALVERT DISTILLERIES LTD.
.AMPLEX DIV.
INDUSTRIAL OUTFALLS
DETROIT RIVER
121
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit £ Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind. Outfall # M.P^ Date Recorded Discharge Obs.
Detroit River
Wl* 8.33 U-
Shawinigan Resins
Monsanto Chemicals W5
4-24 to Ho flow-hole in dike
11-12 seven feet wide.
Mobil Oil
W7
8.39
9.1*0
McLouth Steel
to Ho flow.
11-12
5-9
5-15
5-23
5-29 to
8-9
8-22
9-13
9-20
9-27
10-3
10-11
10-22
10-31
11-12
10.78
5-9
'5-15
5-23
5-29
6-7
6-11
6-12
6-21
6-28
7-3
7-12
7-19
8-6
8-9
8-22
No flow.
Greenish black oil, clinic
on rocks nearby, water wan
steaming.
Ho flow.
Gray.
Ho flow
Gray w/rcddish tint traces
of oil light 'flow.
Ho flow.
Ho flow.
Ho ilow.
Dark gray.
Ho flow.
Ho flow.
Oil, It. flow, H S smell
Ho visible flow.
Dark ci"Qy«
Red-brown, good flow.
Reddish
Red
Dark cray
Dark red for 300" doimntrean
Red
Reddish, moderate flow.
Dark Gray, moderate flow.
Black, moderate flow.
Black heated heavy discharge.
Brownish "black'.'acavy' discharge.
Reddish brown, nccL flow.
Clear, It. flow.
Reddish brown
Very light gray, nied. flow.
122
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers'
Industria and Municiual Discharges
*
Municipality or Ind. Outfoll 4' M«P. . Date Recorded Discharge Obs.
Detroit River '
McLouth Steel
10.78
10.78
wio 10.97
9-13 Light flow.
9-20 No flow, plant on strike.
9-27 Clear, It. flow, plant on strike.
10-3 Reddish.
10-5 Dk. brown, traces oil mod. flow.
10-11 Reddish mod. flow.
10-17 Black oil, med. flow.
10-22 Black heavy flow.
10-31 Dk. reddish brown med. flow.
11-12 - Lt. brown, heavy flow.
h-2.U Lt. gray.
5-9 Clear, rapid flow, steaming
5-15 Clear
5-23 White
5-29 Lt. Gray
6-7 Lt. red for 300' downstream.
6-11 Black
6-12 Black, mod. flow.
6-21 Lt. black, heated, hvy. flow.
6-28 Gray, heated hvy. flow.
7-3 Gray
7-12 Brownish black hvy. flow.
.7-19 Lt. gray med. flow.
8-6 Clear med. flow.
8-9 . Light gray
8-22 Clear med. flow.
9-13 Clear It. flow.
9-20 Clear very little flow.
9-27 Clear It. flow planton strike.
10-3 Clear
10-5 Reddish mod. flow.
10-11 Clear mod. flow.
10-17 Lt. Gray heavy flow.
10-22 Gray heavy flow.
10-31 Med. Brown heavy flow.
11-12 Lt. brown heavy flow.
k-2h Clear little flow.
5-15 Clear little flow.
; 5-29 No flow.
6-7 Grayish
123
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
Municipality or Ind. OutJell # M.P
Detroit River
UIC
Rocordcd Discharge Obs.
McLouth Steel
Wll
Firestone
W12
10.97 6-12 Dark green, little flow.
6-21 Lt. gray, little flow,
7-3 Black, heated, med. flow.
7-12 Clear
3-6 to No visible flow.
11-12
11.21 h-2k Plowing clear
5-9 Black-high velocity flow,
discolored river out about 30''
5-15 Black-high velocity flow,
discolored river out about 30'
5-23 Black some oil.
5-29 Black, heated discharge
6-7 .Black out 50' downstream 200'.
6-11 Black.
6-12 Grayish med. flow.
6-21 Black, heated, heavy flow.
6-28
7-3 Gray heated heavy flow.
7-12 Lt. gray, med. flow.
7-19 Dark brown med. flow.
8-6 Clear very light flow.
8-9 to No flow.
9-20
9-27 Dr. gray It. flow
(ELanton strike).
10-3 Blackish It. flow.
10-5 Black med. flow.
.10-11 Gray med. flow.
10-17 Black It. flow.
- 10-22 Reddish black med. flow.
10-31 Gray-brown heated med. flow.
11-12 Dark brown med. flow.
11-7 Lt. reddish heated.
12.11 k-2h Greenish color
5-9 Clear, slow flow.
5-23 to No flow observed.
7-19
8-6 Lt. gray It. flow.
8-9 No flow observed
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharge;
1968
Municipality or Bad. Outfall f- M.P. . Date Recorded Discharge Obs.
Detroit River
Firestone.
W12
12.11
ra.3 12.23
Perm salt
12.35
8-12
9-13
9-20
9-27
10-3
10-5
10-11 to
11-12
h-2h
5-15 '
5-23
6-7
6-11
6-12 to
7-19
8-6
8-9
8-22
8-22
9-13 to
11-12
l|-2lt
5-9
5-15
5-23
5-29
6-7
6-12
6-21
6-28
7-3
7-12
7-19
8-6
8-9
8-22
9-13
Ho flow observed
Dark gray med. now.
Wo flow smell of acid.
Ho flow.
Ho visible flow.
Very little flow.
Ho visible flow.
Ho observed flow.
ii ii ii
it it 11
ti ii - ii «
Yellowish,' large flow.
No flow.
Gray light flow.
Ho flow observed.
Ho flow observed at 9: 26 AM.
Dk. gray discharge at 10:17 AM
Ho flow.
Lt. milky colored.
Yellowish, smells of gas,
mod. flow.
Clear.
Ho flow.
Muddy gray.
Rust color.
Clear.
Clear, mod. flow.
Lt. brown little flow.
Lt. green, It. flow.
Ho flow.
Milky It. flow.
Milky It. flow.
Milky It. flow.'
Lt. gray ned. flow.
Lt. gray intenaittant flow.
125
-------
Table 8
Observation Rune
Detroit & Rouse Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
19-58
Municipality or Ind.
Detroit River
Perm salt
Outran
{ II.P.
12.35
W15 12.58
Date Recorded Discharge Obs.
TO.6 12.63
9-20
9-27
10-3
10-5
j.O-11
10-17
10-lUo
10-22
10-31
11-12
11-7
5-9
5-15
5-23
5-29
6-7
6-12
6-21
6-23
7-3
7-12
7-19
8-6
8-9
8-22
9-13
9-20
9-27
10-3
10-5
10-11
10-17
10-22
10-31
11-12
n-7
5-9
White med. flow.
Lt. gray heavy flow.
Clear
Clear Chemical smell.
Clear It. flow.
Wo visible flow.
Ho visible flow.
Lt. gray heated med. flow.
No visible flow.
Clear flowing
Lt. milky colored.
Brownish, mod. flow.
Murky smells of acid brine.
Light gray.
Muddy gray
Clear
Dark gray.
Clear mod. flow.
Grayish heavy flow.
Yellowish: heavy flow.
Lt. brown med flow.
Lt. gray med. flow.
Clear med. flow.
Clear
Lt. gray heavy flow.
Lt. gray heavy flow.
Clear mod. flow.
Lt. gray heavy flow.
Clear heavy flow.
Clear heavy flow.
Clear It. flow.
Clear med. flow.
Black med. flow.
Lt. gray heavy flow.
Lt. milky heavy How.
Lt. milky.
No flow
Clear, med.
flow.
126
-------
Table 8
Observation Rune
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharge::
1968
JL
Municipality or Ind. Outfall $ M.P.
Detroit River
Pennsalt \U.6 12.63
W17
12.72
Date Recorded Discharge Obs.
5-15 to ITo flow.
6-7
6-12 Clear, med. flow.
6-21 to Ho flow.
V-19
8-6 Reddish It..'.'flow.
8-9 Wo flow.
8-22 Lt. gray heavy flow.
9-13 to Wo flow.
10-3
10-5 Very little flow.
10-11 Very little flow.
10-17 to
11-12 Ho flow.
11-7 Heated med. flow.
h-2k Clear.
5-9 Clear mod. flow
5-15 ' Clear
5-25 Lt.
5-29 Muddy
6-7 Clear
6-12 Whitish-clear mod. flow.
6-21 ' Gray heavy flow.
6-28 Lt. brown heated.
7-3 Yellow tint, heated
heavy flow.
7-12 Lt. graymed flow.
7-19 Lt. cray med. flow.
8-6 Milky med. flow.
8-9 Clear med. flow.
8-22 Lt. Gray heavy flow.
9-13 Lt. gray med. flow.
9-20 Offwhite mod flow.
9-27 Lied Brown Heated heavy flow.
10-3 . Clear mod. flow
10-5 Clear mod. flow.
10-11 Clear chem odor heavy flow.
10-17 Clear heavy flow.
10-22 Lt. gray heavy flow.
10-33. Lt. gray heated heavy flow.
127
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit £ Rovi^e Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Dischargee
1968
Municipality .or Ind. Outfall 7'- M.E. D-TEC Recorded Discharge Obs.
Detroit River
Pennsalt
Wayne County
(Wyandotte)
Wye Street
Wl? 12.72 11-12 Clear heavy flow.
11-7 Clear
12.90 '»-«&' No flow.
p~9 Orange discoloration 20'
into river.
5-15 Reddish
5-23 Rusty color.
5-29 ' Rusty red.
6-7 . Bright rust-red out 100'
downstream 50'
6-12 Whitish, steaming and smells
of chlorine.
6-12 Reddish with acid smell.
6-21 Reddish
r- 6-28 Reddish
7-3 Yellowish, heavy flow.
7-12 Clear, It. flow.
7-19 Lt. brown It. flow.
8-6 Red med. flow.
8-9 Lt. reddish
8-22 Bright red
9-13 Red heavy flow.
9-20 med. flow.
9-27 Clear med. flow.
10-3 Reddish med. flow.
10-5 Reddish med. flow
10-11 Red oiley med. flow.
10-17 Dark red med. flow.
10-22 No visible flow at 9:20 AM
10-22 Bright red at 1:15 EM.
.10-31 Red med. flow.
11-12 Red It. flow.
11-7 Traces reddish very It. flow.
12.89 b-2b No flow.
5-9 Lt. flow, clear.
5-15 No flow.
5-23 No flow.
5-29 Lt. red.
6-7 No flow.
W21
128
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit £ Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ihd. Outfall $ M.P._ Date Recorded Discharge Gbs.
Detroit River
Wye Street
W21 12.89 6-12
6-21
6-28
7-3
7-12
7-19
8-6
8-9
8-22
9-13
9-20
9-27
10-3
10-5
10-11
10-17
10-22
10-31
11-12
11-7
Wyandotte Chemicals
(South Plant)
W22 12.90
5-9
5-15
5-23
6-7
6-12
6-21
6-28
7-3
7-12
7-19
8-6
8-9
8-22
9-13
9-20
9-27
10-3
10-5
10-11
No flow
No flow.
Milky.
No flow.
Submerged no flow.
Lt. brown, It. flow.
Lt. flow, trace of sewage.
Red, med. flow.
No flow.
No flow.
White It. flow.
Dark gray, heated med. flow.
No flow.
Black, chem. odor.
Lt. flow.
No visible flow.
No visible flow.
Gray It. flow.
No visible flow.
No visible flow.
Milky color.
Milky color, It. flow.
Milky color It. flow.
No flow.
No flow.
Whitish, very little flow.
No flow visible.
Not observed.
Lt. gray, heavy flow.
No flow.
No flow.
Lt. gray, It. flow.
Light milky.
No flow.
Milky, It. flow.
No flow.
Lt. gray, It. flow.
No flow.
Lt. flow.
Lt. flow.
129
-------
Table 8
Observation Rune
Detroit & Rouge Riverc
Industrial and Municipal Dischargee
1968
Municipality or Ind. _0u.trall_jfc M-
Detroit River
Wyandotte Chemicals
(South Plant)
W22 12.90
W23 12-97
13-10
Recorded Discharge Obs,
10-1T Dark gray It. flow.
10-22 No visible flow.
10-31 Heated, It. flow.
11-21 No visible flow.
."".-V No visible flow.
U-2.U Milky color
5-9 Greenish white, mod. flow.
5-15 Gray, mod. flow.
5-23 Clear.
5-29 Li£ht gray.
6-7 Gray
6-12 Light gray very( little flow.
6-21 Light gray, mod', flow.
6-28 Gray, It. flow.
7-3 Gray, heavy flow.
7-12 Brown, med. flow.
7-19 Lt. gray light flow.
8-6 " " " "
8-9 Lt. gray med. flow.
8-22 Dark tan med. flow.
9-13 Dark gray, heavy flow.-
9-20 Clear med. flow.
9-27 Gray, heavy flow.
10-3 Clear, mod.-flow.
10-5 Clear, mod. flow.
10-11 Clear, mod. flow.
10-17 Black, med. flow.
10-22 Clear, It. flow.
10-22 Gray, heated, med. flow.
11-12 Brown, med. flow.
11-7 Clear It. flow.
k-2h White
5-9 White, It. flow.
5-15 White, mod. flow.
5-2^ White '& milky
5-29 Milky
6-7 Milky
6-12 White, very little flow.
6-21 Gray, some foam, It. flow.
6-28 Brownish, little flow.
130
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind. Outfall # M.P. Date Recorded Discharge Obs.
Detroit River
Wyandotte Chemicals V12k 13.10 7-3
(South Plant) 7-12
7-19
8-6
8-9
8-22
9-13
9-20
9-27
10-3
10-5
10-11
10-17
10-22
10-31
11-12
11-7
W25 13.15 ^-2^
" 5-9
5-15
5-23
6-7
6-12
6-28
7-3
s 7-12
7-19
8-6
8-9
8-22
9-13
9-20
9-27
10-3
10-5
10-11
10-17
10-22
10-31
11-12
11-7
Clear.
No flow.
Milky with white suds.
Milky med. flow.
Clear It. flow.
Milky It. flow.
No flow.
Very little flow.
Gray, heated It. flow.
Clear mod. flow.
White mod. flow.
White rned. flow.
No visible flow
Lt. gray, It. flow.
Milky gray heated It. flow.
Milky It. flow.
Clear It. flow.
No flow.
No flow.
Submerged no apparent flow.
Milky
Milky, trace of oil.
Dark gray.
No visible flow.
Med. gray, It. flow.
Milky
Dark gray It. flow.
No flow visible.
Dark gray.
Black traces of oil heavy flow.
No flow.
No flow.
Dark gray, heated heavy flow.
Clear mod. flow.
White It. flow.
No visible flow.
No visible flow.
No visible flow.
Brownish med. flow.
Milky It. flow.
No visible flow.
White med. flow.
131
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind. Outfall
Detroit River
Wyandotte Chemicals
(South Plant)
₯26 13-29
(North Plant)
₯27
W27
D»_te Recorded Discharge Obs.^
4-2't
5-9
5-15
5-23
.^29
6 »28 to
9-13.
9-27
Ho flow.
Ho flow.
Submerged,
Ho flow.
Heated, It.
Ho visible
Eeddish, It
no apparent flow.
flow.
flow.
. flow
10-17 to
11-12 Ho visible flow.
h-2k Milky colored
5-15 Yellowish, mod. flow.
5-23 Milky . .
5-29 Milky gray, heavy discharge.
6-7 Milky out 100' downstream 500',
6-12 Milky, mod'flow.
6-21 Gray, heavy flow.
6-28 Brownish, heated, heavy dis-
charge.
7-3 Milky, heavy flow.
7-12 " " "
7-19 Dark milky, med. flow.
8-6 Milky, light flow.
8-9 White foam.
8-22 White
9-13 Dark gray, med flow.
9-20 Milliy, heated, mod flow.
9-27 Gray traces of oil It. flow.
10-3 Milky
10-5 Milky heavy flow.
10-11 Milky
10-17 Milky It. flow.
10-22 Lt. gray, It. flow.
10-31 Gray, heated, med flow.
11-12 Med flow.
11-7 Milky white
ll-ll* Grayish white.
U-2k Black
5-9 Gray (Submerged outlet).
5-15 Ho flow.
5-23 Black.
6-7 Ho flow observed.
132
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind. Outfall # M.P. Date Recorded Discharge Obs,
Detroit River
Wyandotte Chemicals
(North Plant)
W28
W29 14.90
W30 15.33
Du Pont Company
W31 IT.22
Great Lakes Steel
₯32 1T.32
6-11
6-12
6-28
7-3
7-12
7-19
8-6
8-9
8-22
9-13
9-20
10-3 to
11-12 .
5-9
5-15 '
5-23
5-29 to
11-12
5-9
5-15
5-23
5-29 to
11-12
5-9
5-15
5-23
5-29
6-7
6-12
6-28
70
5-9
5-15
5-23
White foamy material,
Milky, little flow.
No flow observed.
it ti ii
Black med flow.
Light gray.
No flow.
Light gray.
Light gray It. flow.
No flow.
White It. flow.
No visible flow.
No flow.
No flow.
No flow.
Rusty.
No observed flow.
No flow.
Lt. flow.
Submerged, no apparent flow.
Rusty.
No observed flow.
Light tan.
Light amber, mod. flow.
Rusty, mod. flow.
Rusty, thick oil
Light yellow.
Clear.
Dark gray, mod flow.
Clear, very light discharge.
Lt. milky color.
Clear.
Grayish, mod flow.
Gray with traces of oil.
133
-------
Table 8
Observation Rune
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind. Outfall __# WbJL
Detroit River
Great Lakes Steel
(Ecorce)
₯32 17.32
W33 IT.37
5-29
6-7
6-12
6-21
^-23
7-12
7-19
8-6
8-9
8-22
9-13
9-20
9-27
10-3
10-5
10-17
10-22
10-31
11-12
11-7
11-22
h-2h
5-9
5-15
5-23
5-29
6-7
6-11
6-12
6-21
6-28
7-3
7-12
7-19
8-6
8-9
Recorded Discharge Obs.
Light gray.
Gray
Gray, mod. flow.
Gray, light flov.
Gray, light flov.
Dark Gray> mod. flow.
Lt. gray It. flow.
Lt. gray med. flov.
it 11 ii it
Clear
Med. flow, clear.
Lt. gray oil.
Lt. Gray> heavy flow.
Clear
Lt. gray, heavy flow.
Lt. gray, heavy flow.
Clear
Grayish.
Clear to gray.
Grayish, mod flow
Grayish with lots of "black oil
Clotvies, large flow.
Gray with oil
Oil patches coming over
skimmer, water level same
as in skimmer.
Oily and gray
Gray oil
Gray, little oil
Dark gray, trace of oil,
mod flow.
Dark gray, rac-d flow.
Dark gray, "black r:olids,
heavy flow.
Dark gray, mod flow.
Reddish "brown, oil. ... ,;1 flow.
Lt. gray oil med flow.
Dark gray oil med flow
"black particles.
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Detroit River
Great Lakes Steel
(Ecorse)
Outf_all__# M.JP.. Dat£ Recorded Discharge Obs.
W33 17-37
17.1*6
8-22 Gray oil med flow.
9-13 Heated heavy flow.
9-20 Rust mod flow.
9-27- Rust oil "nsated heavy flow.
10-3 oil
10-5 Lt. gray oil heavy flow.
10-17 Grayish oil It. flow.
10-22 Milky gray med flow
10-31 Dark rust oil med flow
11-12 Dark gray oil heavy flow.
11-7 Lt gray'mod flow.
11-22 Grayish.
h-2k Blackish color.'
5-9 Reddish-brown ..mod. flow.
5-15 Gray, large flow
5-23 Rusty
5-29 Li£ht gray
6-7 Oily, rust and gray color
6-11 Rust color, oil
6-12 Dark gray, little oil.
6-21 Reddish, heavy flow.
6-28 Dark yellow, oil med flow.
7-3 Jet black, heavy flow.
7-12 Dark reddish med. flow.
7-19 Reddish borwn, heavy, flow.
8-6 Brown oil It. flow.
8-9 Reddish brown med flow.
8-22 Bright rust, trace of oil
med. flow.
9-13 Dark orange trace of oil
heavy flow.
9-20 Lt. gray.
9-27 Rust oil heavy flow.
10-3 Rust
10-5 Rust heavy flow.
10-17 Dark orange heavy flow.
10-22 Reddish brown med flow.
10-31 Dark gray med flow.
11-12 Red med flow.
11-7 Brownish mod flow.
11-It Rust tint
11-22 Rust tint mod flow.
135
-------
Tefole 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind. _Qutfall_<; K..P^ p£ ;:p.
Detroit River
Great Lakes Steel \1& 17.66 h-2h
(Ecorse.) . 5-9
5-15
5-23
5-29
6-7
6-n
6-12
6-21
6-28
7-3
7-12
7-19
8-6
8-9
8-22
9-13
9-20
9-27
10-3
10-5
10-17
10-22
10-31
11-12
11-7
W36
11-22
5-9
5-15
5-23
5-29
6-21
6-28
7-3
7-19
8-22
9-13
9-20
9-27
Recorded Discharge Obs.
Brownish color.
Dh. Gi"£y.' nod. Hoi;, "black
Dlz. cray, lar^e ilov.
Gray
Dark cray.
Gray oily.
Gray and black.
Dark G^ay.
Dark G^ay> heavy flow.
Gray, oil heavy flow.
Dark crav heavy flow.
Dark c^ay med flow.
Dark cra" oil med flow.
Black oil med flow.
Dark Gray oil med flow.
Lt. gray oil Eied flow.
Black oil heavy flow.
Ho visible flow.
Black heavy flow.
Light flow.
Dark c^ay mod flow.
Black It. flow.
Black med flow.
Black med flow.
Black oil heavy flow.
Grayish nod flow.
Grayish
Grayish mod. flow.
Clear
Wo flow.
No flow.
No flow.
Lt. yellow, mod. flow.
No flow. ,
No flow.
Clear very It. flow.
» II II f!
Clear very It. flow.
No flow.
No flow.
Clear It. flow.
136
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Detroit River
. Great Lakes Steel
(Ecorse)
Outfall # M.P. Date Recorded Discharge Obs,
W36
W37
W38
10-3 ' Ho flow.
10-17 No flow.
10-22 Clear It.
10-31 to
.11-22 No flow.
flow.
5-15 Dribble of water.
. 5-23 Very little flow.
5-29 Clear, little flow.
6-7 Dripping
6-21 Trickle
7-12 No flow.
9-13 No flow.
10-17 No flow.
10-22 Clear very little flow.
10-31 Clear very little flow.
11-12 Clear very little flow.
11-7 No visible flow.
11-22 No visible flow.
h-2h Lt. gray.
5-9 Gray.
5-15 Gray mod. flow.
5-23 Black and oily
5-29 Gray, flowing heavy.
6-7 , Clear.
6-11 White
6-12 No flow
6-21 Lt. gray, mod flow.
6-28 Gray mod. flow.
7-3 Lt. gray heavy flow.
7-12 Dark gray med flow.
7-19 . Lt. gray It. flow.
8-6 Clear Lt. flow.
8-9 Dark gray It. flow.
8-22 Light gray It. flow.
9-13 No flow.
9-20 No visible flow.
9-27 Lt. gray. It. flow.
10-3 No visible flow.
10-5 Grayish-It. flow.
10-17 Clear drips.
10-22 Drips.
137
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Munic ipa 1 ity__,or Ind .
Detroit River
Outfall j'f M.t'.
Great Lakes Steel
(Ecorse)
W38
U39
Recorded Discharge Obs.
10-31 Lt. cray It. flow.
11-12 Lt. Gray It. flow.
11-7 Gray med flow.
!--2^ Dark cray.
5-9 . Gray and oily
5-15 Reddish-cray, mod flow.
5-23 Black
5-29 Darlc gray, It. oil, heavy flow.
6-7 Black
6-11 Black and oily.
6-12 Gray, mod flow.
6-21 Black, mod flow
6-28 Dark cray heavy flow.
7-3 Black heavy flow.
7-12 Dark Gray ned flow
7-19 Black med flow.
8-6 Lt. cray light flow.
8-9 Dark gray med flow. .
8-22 Black oil heavy flow.
9-13 Black heavy flow.
9-20 Lt. cray mod flow.
9-27 Black oil heavy flow.
10-3 Mod flow.
10-5 Grayish heavy, flow.
10-17 Black med flow.
10-22 Black heavy flow.
10-31 Lt. "black It. flow.
11-12 Lt. "black It. flow.
11-7 Blackish-gray ned flow.
h-2h' Clear.
5-9 Clear snail flow.
5-15 Clear.
5-23 Gray.
5-29 Clear, It. flow.
6-7 Clear
6-12 Clear, mod flov
6-21 Clear, light flow.
7-3 Dark gray, It. flow.
7-19 No flow.
8-6 Lt. gray, oil, It. flow.
8-22 Lt. greenish It. flow.
138
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind. Outfall #
Detroit River
Great Lakes Steel
(Ecorse)
Mho
Great Lakes Steel
(Strip Mill)
18.T5
18.76
Date_ Recorded Discharge Obs,
9-13 to
10-22 Clear Lt. flow.
10-31 Lt. gray. It. flow.
11-12 Clear It. flow.
:^-7 Heated It. flow.
5-9
5-15
5-27
5-29
6-7
6-11
6-12
6-21
6-28
7-3
7-12
7-19
8-6
8-9
8-22
9-13
9-20
9-27
10-3
10-5
10-17
10-22
10-31
11-12
11-7
11-22
5-15
5-23
5-29
6-7
5-21
Black.
Black large flow.
Black, trace of oil,
large flow.'
Black, oily.
Dark gray, It. oil, heavy,
flow.
Black.
Black.
Dark gray, large flow.
Black, heavy flow.
Jet "black heavy flow.
Jet "black, heavy flow.
Jet "black, heavy flow.
Black heavy flow.
Black oil heavy flow.
Dark gray heavy flow.
Black oil heavy flow.
Jet "black heavy flow.
Lt. gray mod. flow.
Black heavy flow.
Black
Black oil.
Blackish, red heavy flow.
Black heavy flow.
Black heavy flow.
Black heavy flow.
Jet "black oil heavy flow.
Black.
Black.
Black, trace of oil,
Black, oily.
Lt. gray, heavy flow.
Gray oily.
Black, heavy flow.
;. flow.
139
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Detroit River
Great Lakes Steel
(Strip Mill)
Outfall # M. ?. nnt:o Recorded Discharge Obo.
18.76
Island)
Wl»6 19.92
19-
6-28 to
7-19
8-6 .
8-9
8-22
9-13
9-27
10-3
10-5
10-17
10-22
10-31.
11-12
11-7
5-9 to
7-12
7-19
8-6
8-Q
9-13 to
11-3.2
12-3
5-9
5-15
5-17
5-23
5-29
6-7
6-11
6-12
6-21
6-28
7-3
7-12
Lt. gray heavy flow.
Black oil heavy flow.
Reddish heavy flow.
Black oil heavy flow.
Dark gray heavy flow.
Black heavy flow.
Clear
Clear oil.
Gray heavy flow.
Gray heavy flow.
Black heavy flow.
Gray heavy flow.
Jet black oil heavy flow.
Clear. '
No flow.
Lt. gray, It. flow.
Ho flow.
Lt. gray It. flow.
No flow.
Reddish, It. flow.
Black and red.
Gray, large flow.
Gray lg. flow, 50' out
into river.
Gray
Reddish black.
Gray, heated, large flow.
Black out 100' and
downstream 50'.
Reddish.
Gray, heated, heavy discharge.
Black, heated vILh It. oil
heavy dischar^-
Black heated heuv 'discharge.
Dark gray, heated very
heavy discharge.
Gray very heavy discharge.
ifco
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Detroit River
Island)
Outfall # M.P. Date Recorded Discharge Obs.
199^ 7-19 Black very heavy discharge.
8-6 No flow.
8-22 Lt. gray, heavy flow.
9-13 Lt. "brown heavy flow.
9-20 Clear mod. flow.
9-27 Black oil heated hvy. flow.
10-5 Black mod. flow.
10-11 Grayish mod. flow.
10-17 Black heavy flow.
10-22 Dark gray heavy flow.
10-31 Milky heated heavy flow.
11-12 Black heavy flow.
11-7 Clear heated.
11-22 Clear heated
12-3 Grey, heated, oil, mod. flow.
19.97 U-2U Black.
5-9 Clear-gray, small flow.
5-15 Greenish, mod. flow.
5-17 Gray.
5-23 Greenish.
5-29 Black, heated, small flow.
6-7 No flow.
6-11 Gray.
6-12 ' Clear, hot, It. flow.
6-21 Lt. gray, It. flow.
'6-28 Black heated It. flow.
7-3 Dark gray, It. flow.
7-12 Lt. gray, It. flow.
7-19 Lt. gray, It. flow.
8-6 Dark gray, heavy flow.
8-9 Dark gray heavy flow.
8-22 Black med flow.
9-13 Clear It. flow.
9-20 Clear mod flow.
9-27 No flow.
10-5 Clear mod flow.
10-11 Clear.
10-17 Jet "black Lt. flow.
10-22 Black med flow.
10-31 Jet "black heated med flow.
11-12 Clear Lt. flow.
-------
Table 8
Observation Rune
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Detroit River
(Zug Island)
Outfall
1-1.P. D.-tn Recorded Discharge Obs.
19.97 12-3
19.99 H-2lf
5-9
5-15
5-17
5-23
5-28
6-7
6-11
6-12
6-21
6-28
7-3
7-12
7-19
8-6
8-9
8-22
9-13
9-20
9-27
10-5
10-11
10-17
10-22
10-31
11-7
11-22
12-3
WJO 20.02
5-9
5-15
5-17
5-29
6-7
6-11
6-12
6-21
6-28
7-3
7-12
Clear It. flov.
Red.
Gray-red large flov.
Gray-red, mod flov.
Reddish color.
Grayish-black.
Black, heated, heavy flov.
Reddish-black.
Reddish-black.
Reddish-black, heated
heavy flov.
Lt. r,eddich color, mod flov.
Black, heated It. flov.
Black, heated hvy. flov.
Red med flov.
Dark red heavy flov.
Red heavy flov..
Dark c^ay, med flov.
Red heavy flov.
Black heavy flov.
Reddish gray, trace of oil.
Red heavy flov.
Red mod flov.'
Reddish.
Red to rust med flov.
Reddish "brown heavy flov.
Dark brovnish black
heated heavy flov.
Clear, heated.
Blackish red.
Reddish, mod flov.
Red.
Red-brown, mod flow.
Black.
Reddish color.
Red, It. flov.
Reddish color.
Red.
Reddish, mod flov.
Reddish, heated, It. flov.
Black, heated It. flov.
Reddish heated It. flov.
Red, It. flow.
IhS.
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind. Outfall # M.P. Date Recorded Discharge Oba.
Detroit River,
(Zug Island)
W50 20.02
₯51 20.0U
W52 20.09
7-19 Reddish.
8-6 Lt. gray, It. flow.
8-9 Red med flow.
9-20 Black and green oil.
9-27 Red It. flow.
10-11 Bright red.
10-17 Dark red It. flow.
10-22 Red med flow.
11-12 Bright red It. flow.
11-7 Red.
11-22 Red.
12-3 Dark red, med flow.
U-2U Black.
5-9 Clear, warm.
5-15 No flow.
5-23 Greenish.
5-29 .. Lt. gray, heated.
6-7 Greenish.
-6-12 Gray,.heated, It. flow.
6-21 Gray, heated, heavy flow.
7-3 Dark "brown, oil heated,
heavy flow.
7-19 No visible flow.
8-6 No visible flow.
8-9 Milky It. flow.
9-20 Black and green oil.
9-27 Black heated It. flow.
10-11 Heated It. flow.
10-17 Clear heated It. flow.
-10-22 Clear heated.
10-31 Gray heated med flow.
11-12 Lt. flow.
11-7 Clear heated It. flow.
11-22 Red.
12-3 Lt. oil, It. flow.
b-2k Black.
5-9 Black, yellow scums,
oily mod flow.
5-15 Black-gray with oil, out
.into river 6'.
-------
Table 8
Observation Rune
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Detroit River
(Zug Island)
Outfall
M.F. IV-. tx; Recorded Discharge Obs.
W52 20.09
W53 20.
5-23 Black £ oily.
5-29 Darl: Gray, heated,
small flov.
6-7 Black out 20' downstream 200'
' 11 Black.
6-12 Dark gray, heated, mod flow.
6-21 Black, heated, mod flow.
6-28 Black, heated heavy flov.
7-3 Black, heated mod flov.
7-12 Gray It. flov.
7-19 Black med flow.
8-6 Clear very It. flov.
8-9 Lt. cray It. flov. .
8-22 No flov.
9-13 T.To' flov.
9-20 Lt. flov.
9-27 Ho flov.
10-5 Lt. flov.
10-11 Greenish It. flov.
10-17 No flov.
10-22 Kb flov.
10-31 Ho flov.
11-12 No flov.
11-7 Very little flov.
11-22 Milky.
12-3 Whitish Gray, very little
flov.
h-2h ~ Clear.
5-9 to
6-7 No flov.
6-12 Black, heated £ oily,
heavy discharce.
6-21 Black, heated, heavy flov.
6-28 Black, heated, heavy flov.
7-3 Black, heated heavy flov.
7-12 Reddish It. flo;..
7-19 No flov.
8-6 Milky It. flc-,r.
8-9 Dark red, heavy flov.
8-22 No flov.
9-13 Black.
9-20 to '
10-31 Ho flov.
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Detroit River
(Zug Island)
Outfall # M.P. Date Recorded Discharge Olu;.
W53 20.Ih
20.18
₯55 20.21
11-7 Black.
11-12 to
12-3 No flow.
h-Qb Clear.
5-9 Clear.
5-15 ' No flow.
5-23 Clear.
5-29 No flow.
6-7 Clear, cold.
6-28 No flow.
7-3 Submerse.
7-19'' Lt. gray It. flow.
8-6 No visible flow.
8-9 Clear It. flow.
8-22 Clear.
9-20 Lt. flow.
9-27 Clear It. flow.
10-5 Lt. gray, mod flow.
10-11 No visible flow.
10-22 Clear It. flow.
10-31 No visible flow.
11-12 No visible flow.
11-7 Black.
11-22 Clear.
12-3 No flow.
h-2k to
6-28
7-3
7-19
8-6
8-9
8-22 to
10-11
10-17
10-22
10-31
11-12
11-7 '
11-22
12-3
No flow.
Submerged.
Lt. gray med flow.
Lt. red It. flow.
Clear It. flow.
No visible flow.
Clear It. flow.
No visible flow.
Clear med flow.
Clear'It. flow.
Clear.
No flow.
Clear, very little flew.
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Detroit River
(Zug Island)
Outfall & M.P. Date Recorded Discharge Obs.
W56 20.25
Allied Chem. Solvay
Pond
19-59
Schroeder Ave. Sewer W57 20.
h-2h Gray & Black.
5-9 Lt. gray, swift flow.
5-15 Gray 50' out into river.
5-23 Gray.
5-2Q ' Lt. gray, heated, heavy
flow.
6-7 Black out 50', downstream
200'.
6-12 Black, mod discharge.
6-21 Black, heavy flow.
6-28 Black, heated, heavy flow.
7-3 Dark gray heated heavy flow.
7-12 Black It. flow.
7-19 Dark gray med flow.
8-6 No visible now.
8-9 Brown heavy flow.
8-22 Bright red heavy now.
9-13 Black med flow.
9-20 Reddish gray med flow.
9-27 Lt. gray heavy now
10-11 Reddish black.
10-17 Gray heavy flow.
10-22 Gray med now.
10-31 Dark brownish black
heavy now.
11-12 Black heavy now.
11-7 Grayish.
11-22 Lt. gray mod now.
12-3 Black, hot, heavy, now.
k-2k White rubbery foam material.
5-9 White foamy substance
(under water discharge)'
5-15 White foamy material.
5-17 White foamy material.
5-23 White foamy material.
5-29 to
7-13 No flow.
^-2h Unusually red-little now.
5-9 Wo now.
5-15 White, little now.
5-23 White.
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Detroit River
Outfall # M.P. Da te Recorded Discharge Obs.
Schroeder Ave. Sever W57
20.44 5-29 Gray, heated discharge.
6-12 No flow.
6-21 Black, It. flow.
6-28 to
9-20 ' No flow.
9-27 Brownish It. flow.
10-5 to
10-31 No visible flow.
11-12 Tan It. flow.
11-7 No visible flow.
W58 20.hh
Revere Copper & Brace W59 21.06
4-24 Red.
5-9 No flow..
5-15 White foamy material &
reddish material.
5-23 White.
6-21 to
10-31 No visible flow.
4-24 Green,
5-9 Lt. green, little flow.
5-15 Green, 3' out into river,
small flow.
5-23 Green.
5-29 Lt. green.
6-12 Lt. green.
6-21 Greenish.
6-28 Green med flow.
7-3 Med green It. flow.
7-12 Lt. green It. flow.
7-19 -Lt. green It. flow.
8-6 No flow.
8-9 Lt. green It. flow.
8-22 Lt. green It. flow.
9-13 Lt. green It. flow.
9-20 Oil It. flow.
9-27 Lt. gray.
10-5 Greenish med flow.
10-17 Lt. green It. flow.
10-22 Lt. green It. flow.
10-31 Grayish green heated It. flow.
11-12 No visible flow.
11-7 No visible flow.
-------
Table 8
Observation Rune
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind. Outfall _# M.JP._ ]J
-------
Table 8 ;
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind. Outfall^ M.j?;. Jl^te, Recorded Discharge Obs.
Detroit River
Revere Copper & Brann Wol 21.11 10-17 Milky green It. flow.
10-22 Milky It. flow.
3.0-31 Milky green It. flow.
jl»12 Lt. gray It. flow.
"" 7 Green tint.
McKinstry St.
Sever
Storm \l62 21.53
Parke Davis
25.1*6
25.116
5-23
5-29
8-6
8-22
11-7
5-9
5-15
5-23
5-29
6-12
6-28
7-3
0-6
0-9
9-27
10-5
10-31
11-7
5-15
5-23
5-29
6-12
6-21
6-£3 to
8-9
8-22
9-13 to
9-27
10-5
10-17
10-31
l.i -12
."'.1--7
Li^ht green.
Gray.
Green It. flow.
Dark creeii.
Dark ^rcen.
Heated water.
Ho flow.
ITo flow.
Heated discharge.
Heated dincharce.
Clear, heated.
Clear heated It. flqw.
ITo flow.
ITo flow.
JDark :;ray It. flow.
Lir;ht flow.
Clear heated It. flow.
Heated.
Greenish, mod discharge.
Ho flow.
Ho flow.
Ho flow.
Gray, little flow.
Light cray.
Ho flow. '
Lt. green very little flo1-
ITo flow.
Very little flow.
Ho flow.
Heated It. flow.
Ho visible flow.
Ho visible flow.
-------
Table 8
Observation Rune;
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Diccharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Detroit River
- Parke Davic
Outfall
175 5
if;;: Recorded Discharge Obs.
25.^8
U.S. Rubber
W66 26,27
26.28
Greenish, mod. flow.
No flow.
No flow.
lit. gray, little flow.
5-9
5-15
5-23
6-12
6-il5 to
9-20 No flow.
9-27 Lt. gray It. flow.
10-5 Li£ht flow.
10-17 to
11-12 No flow. .
5-9 Clear gray, large flow.
5-15 Grayish.
5-23 Dark gray heavy flow.
5-29 Dark gray, heavy flow.
6-12 Clear, heavy flow.
6-21 Clear, heavy flow.
6-28 Lt. gray med flow.
7-3 Gray heated It. flow.
7-19 Lt. med,flow fiber
coning out.
8-6 Clean ned flow.
8-9 Lt. gray med flow.
8-22 Clear heated.
9-13 Lt. gray med flow.
9-27 Lt. gray heavy flow.
10-5 Clear mod. flow.
10-17 Lt. gray med flow.
10-31 Lt. gray heavy flow.
11-7 Clear.
11-12 Lt. gray med. flow.
5-9 Clear, little flow.
5-15 Grayish.
5-23 Clear.
5-29 Black mod. flow.
6-12 -No apparent flow,
6-21 Gray mod. flow.
6-28 Gray heated It. flo;r.
7-3 Med gray heated It. flow.
8-6 Black med flow.
8-9 Lt. gray med flow.
150
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
^.cipjnl.it;;. .;-;. Si/1- '' ;-.~-'. \-L.^. U'?'- ~~~"
r^,*l~v-:-<:.
v,S, FiibW VJoT £5.28 8~2P. Lt. gray heated.
9-1" Dark gray heavy flow.
9-20 Clear It. flow
(j- "J Dark gray med flow.
?.' " . Clear mod flow.
2 ; Lt. gray It. flow.
10-31 Clear Med flow.
ll-'f Clear.
11-12 Black med flow.
Detroit, BTP Vj'iO 5"'-3 No observed flow.
(Jef:c, St.'bridge) 5-29 No flow.
' 7-12 Black heavy flow.
7-19 Light "brown.
8-5 Dark gray, heavy flow
sewage odor.
8-9 to
9-29 Strong sewage odor,
heavy flow.
10-5 Lt. gray, sewage odor,
1.0-18 to
;- Ho visible flow.
Detroit GTP F(15;> l^'^B 5-? Brownish, surface up-
(r-~1-rr>i-::. River) welling in a huge boil,
: ' [i--.u- Gray, smells of sewage
(10:32 AM)
'.'. .! 2 Dark greyish-Tsrown
Greyish brown.
Flowing gray-"brown, partially
treated sewage.
Dredge working.
7 Reddish brown.
b- -.. Brownish
3,0-22 Bro'.m, mod flow.
10-31 ?>rc',miGh mod flow.
11--T ""' 'ownich mod flow.
7 "i .. }.Town mod flow.
"'" '.'.' Jdght gray.
-------
Table 8
Observation Rune
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.^ 0utfall_
Detroit River
ConnerB Creek
Ecorse Creek
M. P. D'-te Recorded Discharge Obs.
5-9 Methane bubbles, oil films
and a gray streak along
northern bank.
5-15 Bubbles and pieces of the
bottom raising to the
surface. The greenish
brown water had evidence
of raw sewage in it.
6-12 Grayish black with trace of
oil. Smells of sewage.
6-21 Methane bubbles present.
6-28 Patches of oil and sewage.
Heavy flow of dark grey
water. Patch o'f sludge
8' across near creeks niouth.
7-3 Slight traces of oil,
appears in better than
average condition.
7-19 Dark gray with strong
sewage odors.
8-9 Oil and sewage greyinh
in color.
8-22 Fairly clean looking.
9-20 Oil and sewage odors.
9-27 Traces of light oil, L-ater
black, bottom fermenting.
10-5 Iii respectable condition.
10-17 No flow, clean looking,
minnows present.
11-7 Looks good, but has
strong sewage odor.
k-2.h Reddish brown.
5-9 No flow perceptable.
5-15 Water rust colored.
5-23 Rusty with traces of oil.
5-29 Heavy debris.
6-12 Looks good, no v, t^sh or
debris.
6-21 Looks good, no trash cr
debris.
7-12 No oil, iron colored.
7-19 Light oil and scum.
152
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Detroit River
Ecorse Creek
Outfall # M.P. Date Recorded Discharge Obs.
8-9 Light oil.
8-22 Black material coming off
"bottom, sewage odors.
9-13 Some "black patches of
sewage 1x2 feet in size.
9-20 Looks good.
10-5 Greenish in color with
floating duck weeds.
10-17 E;:ceptionally clean.
11-12 Clean.
11-7 ' Looks'good.
11-12 Clean.
Rouge River
Allied Chemical
(Semet Solvay)
DT 19.h
moo NC -;Vr
h-Sh' Black as coal.
5-9 Black, trace of oil,
' mod flow.
5-15 Black, mod flow covers
almost half of old channel.
5-23 Black a little oil.
5-29 Milky gray, mod flow.
6-7 Jet "black, and oily.
6-11 Black and oily.
6-12 Black and oily clear
across channel.
6-28 ' Black and oily heated
strong flow.
7-3 Black and oHy heated
strong flow.
7-12 Black, It. flow.
7-19 Jet black heavy flow.
8-6 Lt. gray It. flow.
8-9 Jet "black.
8-22 Black some oil It. flow.
9-13 Black heavy flow.
9-20 Black lots of oil, mod
flow, at 11:58 AM.
9-20 Black oily at 1:1*5 R.I
9-27 Black rued flow.
153
-------
Table 8
Observation Runr,
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Rouge River
Allied Chemical
(Gemet Solvay)
Outfall # M.P. Dntc Recorded Discharge Obs.
DT 1
ra.oo NC J
(Solvay Process) W10H OC .85
W105 OC .90
10-5
1Q-11
10-22
10-31
11-1
11-7
11 -ll*
11-19
11-22
11-22
12-3
5-9
5-15
5-17
5-23
5-29
6-7
6-12 .
6-21
6-28
7-3
7-12
7-19
8-6 to
9-13
9-20
Jet black oil or tar.
Black oil or tar.
Jet "black med flow.
Black oil or tar med flow.
Black oil or tar med flow.
Black oil or tar tried flow.
Jet black oil or tar ned flow.
Light flow.
Black heated at 1:21 H-l
Jet black oil or tar heated
at 9:58 AM.
Black, heated, light flow.
Clear.
No flow.
Gray.'
Black.
'Milky
No flow.
Milky.
Milky, little flow.
Ho visible flow.
No visible flow oil in
channel.
Dark gray, little flow.
No flow.
Lt. gray, It. flow.
No flow.
Black very little flow.
9-27 to
12-3 No viciblc flow.
U-2k Milk color.
5-9 ' White mod flow.
5-15 White mod flow.
5-17 White. - -
5-23 White.
5-29 Dark gray light flc...
6-7 to
6-28 No flow.
7-12 Clear.
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Rouge River
(Solvay Process)
Ou_t£a_ll_£ M.P.
DT 19.1)
ra.05 oc .90
TO.06 OC .95
TCL07
.76
Date Recorded Discharge Obs.
7-19 to
8-22 No' flow.
9-13 Lt. gray It. flow.
9-20 No flow.
9-27 to
11-1^ No'visible flow.
11-19 Lt. flow.
11-22 No visible flow.
12-3 No flow.
h-2h Milky color.
5-9 tthite light oil.
5-15 Light white mod flow
covers over 50$ of old
channel.
5-23 White. '
5-29 Dark gray, It. flow.
6-7 Oily.
6-12 Oil around dike.
6-21 Gray.
6-28 Oil around dike.
7-3 Clear, oil It. flow.
7-12 Clear.
7-19 No flow.
8-6 No flow.
8-9 Lt. gray.
8-22 No flow.
.9-13 No flow.
9-20 No flow.
9-27 Traces of oil.
10-5 to
12-3 No visible flow.
5-23 Light gray.
5-29 Heated discharge.
6-7 Grayish.
6-12 No flow.
6-21 Gray, heated, little flow.
6-28 Heated, flow not visible.
7-3 Mod gray, heated, It. flow.
5-9 No flow.
8-22 Traces of oil.
155
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
River
Outfall y M._?__._ .?_"_*£ Recorded Discharge Obs.
(Plastics -Division) '-J107 OC .76 9-13
(Solvay) . 9-20
9-27
10-5
10-n
11-1
11-7
11-19
11-22
12-3
W110 OC .09 4-24
5-9
5-23
5-29
6-7
6-12
Clear, heavy now.
Clear heavy flow.
Lt. n -'"" y> 1^« -"low.
Lt. flew.
No vin.Vblc flow.
Clear heated
Gray It. flow.
Bei^o, heated.
Heavy flov.
Lt. nray.
Heated,, li^ht flow.
Milky color.
Gray-Tmite mod '
Clear.
Clear, nod flow.
Clear.
vail oc .09
ra.12 oc .08
Clear, nod flow.
6-21 to
7-19 Clear, lijjht flow.
8-6 Mo flow.
8-9 to
10-5 Clear lifjlrfc flow.
10-11 Very little flow.
11-1 Very litole flow.
11-7 Clear Very little flow.
11-14 Very little flow.
11-19 to
12-12 No visible flow.
4-24 to
6-28 No flow.
7-3 Clear very little flow.
7-12 to
12-12 No flow.
4-24 to
5-23 No flow.
5-29 Clear, licht flow.
6-7 to
6-21 No flow.
6-28 Clear, very little flew.
156
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Outfall # M.P.
DT
ate Recorded Discharge Obs.
Municipality or Ind.
Roti^e River
(Plastics Division) VJ112 OC .08 7-3 Gray very little flow.
(Solvay) . 7-12 to
12-12 No flow.
(Gen. Division)
1CL13 HC 1.30
NC 1.33
h»2h Clear.
"5r9 Flowing clear.
5-15 Greenish color, little flow.
5-23 Reddish.
5-29 Lt. gray, little flow.
6-7 Murky
6-21 Clear.
7-3 Brown heavy flow.
7-12 Lt. gray. It. flow.
8-9 Lt. gray
9-13 Lt. milky gray It. flow.
9-l4 Grayish med flow.
9-27 Dark gray heavy flow.
10-5 Clear mod flow.
10-18 Blackish brown med flow.
11-1 Grayish med flow.
11-7 Brownish It. flow.
11-14 Clear med flow.
11-19 Brown It. flow.
11-22 Lt. gray It. flow.
12-3 Brownish It. flow.
k-2h Clear.
5-9 Yellowish, little flow.
5-15 No flow.
5-23 Rusty.
5-29 Light brown, little flow.
6-7 No flow.
6-21 No flow visible.
7-3 Light brown med flow.
7-12 No flow.
8-9 Light gray.
9-13 Lt. gray med flow.
9-20 Grayish med flow.
9-27 Dark gray It. flow.
10-5 Lt. gray med flow.
10-18 Blackish brown It. flow.
157
-------
Table 8 '
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind. Outfall # M.P. Date Recorded Discharge Obs.
Rouge River
(Plastics Division)
(Gen. Division)
DT 19.
MZl.ll I7C 1.33
Great Lakes Steel
(Zug Island)
U101 OC 1.37
Peerless Cement
W108 OC .1*7
11-1 Grayish nod flow.
11-7 Brownish It. flow.
11-1*; Clear med flow.
in.-19 Brown It. flow.
11-22 Lt. gray rncd flow.
12-3 ' Brownish It. flow.
5-9 Black mod flow.
5-15 Runt large flow.
5-23 Jet black none oil,
covers 2/3 of old channel.
5-29 Black, 'heavy flow.
6-7 Reddish color. '
6-12"; Black.
6-21 Black, heavy flow.
7-3 Black heavy flow.
7-12 Black mod flow.
9-13 Lt. gray It. flow.
9-20 Clear It. flow.
9-27 Black It. flow.
10-5 Clear mod flow.
10-11 Clear med flow.
11-1 Clear
11-7 Lt. gray It. flow.
11-lU Black, heated.
11-19 Black heavy flow.
11-22 Black heated
h-2k Milky color.
5-9 Clear, white particulate
matter, mod. flow.
5-23 Clear.
5-29 Milky gray, heavy flow.
7-12 Milky heavy flow.
7-19 Milky heavy flow.
9-13 Med brown heavy flow.
11-1 Clear mod flow.
11-7 Lt. gray heavy flor:
11-14 Clear heavy flow.
11-19 Lt. brown It. flow.
11-22 Clear.
158
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Rouge River
Peerless Cement
Outfall # M.P. Dote Recorded Discharge Obs.
W115 NC 1*30
W116 NC 1.33
h-zh
5-9
5-15
5-23
--29"
6-7
6-12
6-21
6-28
7-3
7-12
7-19
8-6
8-9 to
9-27
10-3
10-5
10-11
ll-l
11-7
11-lU
11-19
11-22
12-3
5-9
5-15
5-23
5-29
6-7
6-12
6-21
7-3
7-12
7-19
Clear.
Whitish.
Clear, mod flow.
Light white.
Clear, It. flow.
Clear.
Clear, mod flow.
Clear, It. flow.
Dark brown It. flow.
Lt. brown It. flow.
Clear It. flow.
Clear It. flow.
Milky heavy flow.
Clear It. flow.
Clear.
Clear med flow.
Clear med flow.
Clear It. flow.
Clear It. flow.
Clear med flow.
Clear It. flow.
Clear
Very It. flow.
Clear.
Clear with white
particulate matter.
Clear slight chalky
color small flow.
Clear.
Yellow, mod. flow.
Clear.
Clear, mod flow.
Gray It. flow.
Dark brown, heavy discharge.
Lt. brown, It. flow.
Clear It. flow.
Clear It. flow.
"-5 Milky med flow.
0-9 to
0-20 Clear It. flow.
9-27 Brownish It. flow.
159
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Rouge River
Peerless Cement
Ou_t£aj.j._#
W116 NO 1.33
W135 -
Scott Paper Co,
W109 OC .28
ft'- cor d e d D i s char ge Ob s .
10-3 Clear.
10-5 White med flow.
10-11 Clear med flow.
11-1 Clear mod flow.
11-7 Clear It. flow.
11-lU Clear med flow.
11-19 Light brown med flow.
11-22 Clear med flow.
12-3 Licht flow.
U-2l| Milky.
5-9' Clear.
5-15 Clear, mod flow.
5-23 Clear.
5-29 Yellow mod flow.
6-7 Clear.
6-12 White, mod flow.
6-21 Milky, heavy flow.
6-27 Milky, heavy flow.
7-3 Thick,milky, heavy flow.
7-12 Milky med flow.
7-19 Clear med flow.
8-22 Clear It. flow.
9-13 Clear heavy flow.
9-20 White
9-27 Clear It. flow.
10-3 White, delta "being built
by wastes.
10-5 to
11-19 Clear med flow.
11-22 Clear It. flow.
12-3 White mod flow.
b-2k Dark brown & white foam.
5-9 Brown, large flow.
5-17 Gray.
5-23 Brown.
5-29 Reddish brown.
6-7 Brownish with white .-.?.ra
out 60' downstream 300'.
6-12 Reddish brown.
6-21 Black.
6-28 Black.
160
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Rouge River
Scott Paper Co.
Outfsll v M.P. Date Recorded Discharge Obs.
10.09 OC .28
Ford Motor Co. . W122 - -
.7-12 Dark red to black.
7-19 Dark reddish brown.
8-6 Lt. flow, paper by-
product in water.
8-9 Dark brown med flow.
--22 Reddish.
9-13 Dark brown med flow.
9-20 Dark red.
9-27 Black med flow.
10-5 Beige mod flow.
10-11 Brownish.
11-1 Milky grayish.
11-7 Brownish red mod flow.
11-14 Reddish brown
11-19 Lt. brownish It. flow.
11-22 Brownish red.
12-12 Reddish mod flow.
h-2h Oily, brownish color.
5-15 Oily,,reddish color
large flow.
5-17 Traces of oil.
5-23 Grayish.
5-29 Plowing, no oils.
6-7 , Grayish and oily.
6-12 ' Black oily.
6-21 Dark gray, some oil,
heavy flow.
6-28 Some oil heavy discharge.
7-3 Black some oil heavy
discharge.
7-12 Heavy oil med discharge.
7-19 Lt. gray.
8-6 Lt. gray some oil med
discharge.
8-9 Black oil med. discharge.
8-22 Black oil
9-13 Black oil heavy flow, '
9-20 Dark gray oil mod flow.
9-27 Black oil heavy flow.
10 ~ Grayish
10-5 Grayish oil mod:.' flow.
161
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Rouge River
Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co.
Outfall # M.P. Drtu Recorded Discharge Obs.
W122 - - 10-11 Grayish
11-1 Grayish oil.
11-7 Oil.
:<1~1^ Oil mod flow.
11-19 Oil mod flow.
11-22 Grayish oil
12-3 Some oil mod flow.
12-12 Black, heavy flow of oil.
W123 - - 5-15 Dark brown
5-17 Black.
5-23 Black with traces of oil.
5-29 Dark cray> heated discharge.
6-7 Grayish.
6-12 Black oily.
6-21 Dark gray.
7-3 Jet black It. flow.
7-12 Ho flow visible.
7-19 Ho flow visible.
8-6 Lt. c**ay some oil It. flow.
8-9 Black It. flow.
8-22 Black some oil.
9-13 Black some oil heavy flow.
9-20 Black some oil nod flow.
9-27 Black nod flow.
10-3 Black oil.
10-5 Black oil med flow.
10-11 Black oil
11-1 Black
11-7 Gray It. flow.'
11-1^ Black oil heated It. flow.
11-19 Black oil heated med flow.
11-22 Black oil.
12-3 Black oil heated It. flow.
- 12-12 Black oil heated med flow.
HC 3-^0 h-2h Clear.
5-15 Clear.
5-23 Clear.
5-29 Lt. milky color.
6-7 Clear.
162
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Rouge River
Ford Motor Co.
Outfallf M.P. Date Recorded Discharge Obs.
W12U ITC 3.1;0
W125 HC 3
6-12 Gray trace of oil.
6-21 Lt. gray, trace of oil.
T-3 Lt. Gray, heavy flow.
7-12 Clear heavy flow.
'-'19 Clear.
8-6 Lt. cray med flow.
8-9 Clear.
8-22 Milky heavy flow. '
9-13 Darlc gray heavy flow.
9-20 Clear little oil mod flow.
9-27 Lt. cray little oil heavy
flow.
10-5 Clear heavy flow.
10-11 Clear mod flow. '
11-1 Clear heavy flow.
11-lU Clear mod flow.
11-19 Clear oil heavy flow.
11-22 Clear heavy flow.
12-3 Gray mod flow.
12-12 Clear, mod flow.
5-23
5-29
6-7
6-21
7-19
8-6
8-9
-
8
9-13
9-20
9-27
10-5
10-11
Oil "behind skimmers.
Rusty and oily discharge.
Heavy black oil and debris
"behind skimmer and coming out
of skimmer.
Clear.
to
Heavy oil inside skimmer.
Light gray med flow.
Heavy oil inside skimmer
some outside skimmer.
Heavy oil inside skimmer.
Heavy oil inside skimmer.
Traces of oil mod flow.
Heavy oil inside skimmer.
Heavy, oil inside skimmer.
Little oil med flow.
to
1 Heavy oil inside of skimmer.
Light flow.
163
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Dischargee
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Rouge River
Ford Motor Co.
put£all_.# Jl«jL '£2.tc. Recorded Discharge Obs_.,
NO 2.96 4-24
5-15
5-23
5-29
6-7
6-21
7-3
7-12
7-19
8-6
8-9
8-22
9-13
9-20
10-3
10-5
10-11
ll-l
11-7
11-22
12-3
12-12
17127 NC 3.31
5-15
5-23
5-29
6-7
6-21
6-28
7-3.
7-12
7-19
8-6
8-9
8-22
9-13
Grayish color.
Black-gray with a little
oil present, large flow.
Black oily.
Dark gray, heated discharge.
Gray.
Black heated with some oil,
nod. flow.
Black heated heavy flow.
Black heated heavy flow.
Black heated med flow.
Gray med flow.
Black
Dark gray trace of oil
light flow.
Black ried flow.
Black oily
Black oily.
Black oily heavy flow.
Black oily med flow.
Black some oil.
Black med flow.
Black oil heavy flow.
Black.
Black little oil, It. flow.
Reddish "black, no oil,.
mod. flow.
Greenish color.
Green-gray with oil, mod flo'.
Black and oily.
Lt. gray, heated discharge.
Greenish oily.
Dark gray, heated, It. flow.
Med gray, oily, heated,
It. flow.
Green and rust It. flow.
Lt. gray It. flow.
Lt. gray It. flow.
Lt. gray.
Lt. gray oily heated.
Med gray med flow.
164
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Rouge River
Ford Motor Co.
Edward Levy
Darling Company
Raisin River
Ford Motor Co.
Outfall# MJiL Date . Recorded Discharge Obs.
V7127 NC 3-31 9-20 Med gray oily.
. - 10-3 Greenish.
10-5 Greenish mod flow.
10-11 Greenish.
11-1 Greenish.
11-7 Lt. gray It. flow.
11-lU Greenish.
11-19 Lt. "brown med flow.
11-22' Greenish heated.
12-3 Black hot, mod flow.
12-12 Lt. green, heated mod. flow.
W130 NC U.26 10-5 Dark gray., heavy flow.
W131 NC 3.59 ^-2b No flow.
VJ132 NC 3.92 h-2k Grayish.
WL50
.76
TO. 51
.98
TCL52- 1.09
5-16 Clear oily with large flow.
7-17 Film of oil
8-29 Film of oil.
9-12 Traces of oil submerged.
10-23 Oil film heavy flow.
10-28 Light flow.
11-15 Mod flow.
12-12 Light oil, mod flow.
5-l6 Clear small flow.
7-17 Film of oil.
8-29 Clear It. flow.
9-12 Black traces of oil.
10-22 Clear It. flow.
10-28 Traces of oil mod flow.
11-15 Light flow.
11-21 Clear It. flow.
12-12 Traces of oil, mod. flow.
5rl6 Gray small flow.
7-12 Film of oil.
8«29 Dark "black oil It. flow
Sewage.
165
-------
Table 8
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind.
Raisin River
Ford Motor Co.
Outfall ?* M.P. Dr,te Recorded Discharge Obs.
W152 l.OQ
Mason Run
W153
Consolidated South
Macon Run at Ford
Motor Co. bridge
Monroe STP
Wlfl
Wl80
9-12 Dark black oil It. flow
Sewage.
10-23 No visible flow.
10-28 Med flow.
11-Ojf No visible flow.
11-21 No visible flow.
12-12 Clear, light flow.
5-16 Dark-gray sewage and paper
mill smell, bottom of river
coming up. Outfall effects
large portion of river.
8-29 Ho visible flow.
9-12 Grayish and milky.
10-23 Lt. gray It. flow.
10-28 Grayish.
11-15 Grayish.
12-12 Heavy grease & oil, water
blue-black.
5-l6 Gray-white paper mill wastes,
large flow. White fibers.
7-12 Dark gray.
9-12 Milky gray med flow.
10-23 Milty Gray heavy flow.
10-28 Black It. flow.
11-15 Dart: gray oil.
.11-29 White milky mod flow.
12-12 Milky grey, mod, trace of oil,
7-12 Heavy oil.
11-15 Dirty milky.
5-l6 Clear-brown some grease,
large flow.
7-12 Lt. gray med flow strong
sewage odor.
8-29 Lt. gray med flo-.r,
9-12 Clear med flow.
10-23 G-ray med flow strong sewage
odor.
166
-------
Table 8 (
Observation Runs
Detroit & Rouge Rivers
Industrial and Municipal Discharges
1968
Municipality or Ind. Outfall # M.P. Date Recorded Discharge Obs.
Raisin River
Monroe STP Wl80 - 10-28 Gray.
11-15 Brownish gray.
11-21 Lt. gray mod flow.
12-12 Lt. gray.
Wl8l - . 5-16 Clear mod. flow.
167
-------
OBSERVATION RUNS
General Observations - Detroit and Rouge Rivers
Date; April 2k, 1968
Water in the Detroit River near Great Lakec Steel ic blackish
to reddish.
Trenton Channel: the JOSEPH S. YOUNG is discharging black coal
dust on the water.
Date; May 9, 1968
Black creosol-likc o?'ln corering the Rouge River near 1-75 bridge
appears to come from Oakwood Tumping Station.
Raw sewage observed near Leib storm drain.
Date; May 15, 1968
The Detroit River near Ecorse Channel is yellowish-red along
shore downstream from Great Lakes Steel.
Rouge River turning basiu has bright red color, methane bubbles
and oil globs.
Asphalt was being pushed into Rouge River just north of U.S.
Gypnum Company.
The tug MARYLAND was tossing trash into the Rouge River near
Great Lakes Towing Company.
Blood red water with grease was observed being discharged on
the Canadian side of the Detroit River near Consolidated Truck Lines.
Date: May 16, 1968
Detroit River riled and muddy. Mud probably a result of "b^Lu
and bottom erosion near Ft. Mouillee. Water off Swan Creek brownish-
green for about 3A of a mile.
168
-------
.Bank erosion "by waves on the south end of Grosse lie causing
sandy colored water in that area.
Date; May 17, 1968
Asphalt floating downstream from just north of U.S. Gypsum.
Duribar and Sullivan dredge working near Scott Paper Company.
«
Date; May 23, 1968
Oil all over old channel of the Rouge River.
Blood, meat chunks and fat "balls observed near Consolidated
Freight of Canada.
Date; May 29, 1968
Rouge River covered with oil and debris.
The Detroit River was muddy and laden with debris over its
entire length.
Date: June 7, 1968
Oil slick between Celeron Island and mainland and between
Calf Island 'and mainland in the Trenton Channel.
Bright red color in the water between Ford Slip and Dix bridge
on the Rouge.
The Rouge River is rust colored, oily and trashy. Looks
normal.
Ferry MANITOWOC spilled oil (approximately 150 gallons) into
Detroit River creating an oil slick 30' wide.
Another oil slick in Fighting Island Channel consisted of a
black and brown oil film 200' long.
169
-------
Date: June 11, 1968
Light trace of oil and scum running from the monitor to the
mouth of the Rouge River.
. White and brownish material at Firestone and running north to
W28. White foamy material coining out of W28 (Wyandotte Chemicals).
Heavy oil, rainbow color near Great Lakes Steel, Ecorse Mill. -
Date; June 12, 1968
Wyandotte and Trenton Channels'look good.
Lots of trash in Old Channel of Rouge River.
DuBois drain discharging red water.
Detroit River black-blue and red from Great Lakes Steel outfalls
out into the river 150 feet.
Canadian outfall (Oullette St.) near Consolidated was flowing
red with meat scraps and fat balls.
Detroit Lime Company is digging out the delta of lime created
by their outfall discharge.
Heavy oil flowing from Oakwood Pumping Station Creek.
Semet Solvay outfall U100 discharging black oily water.
Date; June 21, 1968
Scott Paper Company discharging black wastes.
Rouge River normal; heavy iron ixide color with light oil
film covering river.
Date: June 28, 1968
Rouge River is at flood stage-waters are muddy. Large p-teh
of oil in Old Channel near
170
-------
DuBois storm sever flowing heavy with dark red color.
Date; July 3, 1968
The Detroit River appears in tetter than average condition.
Date; July 12, 1968
Iron color coming downstream, in a 150 foot strip along the
chore of the Trenton Channel.
Corps of Engineers dredge HOFFMAN dredging in Rouge River.
Rouge River covered with thick globs of "black oil.
Date: July 17, 1968
Light film of oil across river between Ford and Mason Run on
Raisin River.
Lake Erie free of debris and clean.
Date; July 19, 1968
Rouge River had heavy concentrations of oils which were
reported to have been on the river all week.
Heavy oil was observed on the Detroit River about 300 feet
from the U.S. Rubber Company.
Date; August 6, 1968
Rouge River appears better than usual, slight traces of oils
and little debris. Bottom bubbling from STP (wAo) to rivers
mouth.
Iron oxide colored water extending downstream from Great Lakes
Steel Corp. for 2 miles.
Date; August 9, 1968
'Light oil film and scum in Trenton Channel of Detroit River,
171
-------
heavier concentrations upstream to the Rouge River north. Iron
oxide heavy from Southfield to Great Lakes Steel (Ecorse).
Rouge River had coal duct and iron oxide discoloring much of
the river. Oils vere light.
Date; August 22, 1968
Trenton Channel appears to "be in exceptionally good condition.
The waters of the Detroit River "below W^3 (Great Lakes Steel
Strip Mill) are grey out about 200 feet.
A white, material van four1/", floating near the Great Lakes Boat
Club in an area 50 feet "by 100 feet.
Date: August 29, 1968
The Raisin River was covered .with a light film of oil. Debris,
scum, and paper wastes vere floating on the surface. Traces of
sewage were observed along with bubbles from decomposing sludges.
Seven people were observed swimming at Sterling State Park.
Date:- September 12, 1968
Lake Erie appears greenish-gray to greenish-blue with a green
film on the water.
Date; September 13,
Iron oxide color visible for 1 1/4 miles downstream from Great
Lakes Steel at Ecorse.
Heavy oil in Ford Turning Basin and lower Rouge. Iron oxide
color from Turning basin to 1-75 bridge.
Date; September 20, 1968
Rusty color in river 1 1/2 miles downstream from Great Lakes
Steel at Ecorse.
172
-------
Oil on Detroit River downstream from Rouge River and the
Detroit STP outfall one and one half miles. Rouge River with oil
extending upstream to 1-75 "bridge.
Mats of weeds floating down the Detroit River.
Date; September 27, 1968
Rouge River had heavy load of iron oxide from the Ford Slip
to 1-75 "bridge. Medium black oil was on the surface, and "bottom
fermentation was taking place all along the river.
Date; October k, 1968
Rouge River was greyish and smelled of sewage from W. Jefferson
St. bridge to mouth.
Gala-rood Pump Station drain was "being cleaned of surface oils.
Date; October 5, 1968
Traces of light oil and scum near Wyandotte Chemicals.
Black effluent running into the Trenton Channel near the
Bob-Lo dock discolors river 20 feet out for 1000 feet downstream.
The Rouge smells of sewage. It is grey and bubbling from
the mouth to the ₯. Jefferson St. bridge. Oil covers the river
near the 1-75 bridge. Heavy oils and tar spots found along reach
between Fort St. and Dix (MP = 2.75). The Ford Slip and turning
basin to Dix Ave. was reddish orange with a thin film of black oil.
Date; October 17, 1968
Scum on the Detroit River was observed Ion a distance of one
mile below Wyandotte Chemicals.
Iron oxide from Great Lakes Steel at Ecorse was still visible
ITS
-------
in the water 1 3A miles below the discharge. - ~
A "black discharge was traced from Uii3 &n<3. Vhb downstream a
distance of 3000 feet on the Detroit River.'
Date; October 18, 1968
The ALFREDO PRIMQ vac observed discharging black oil at the
Detroit Marine Terminal on the Rouge River.
Date; October 22, 1968
The Detroit STP (R155) and the Rouge River discolors the
Detroit River in an croc. ;jC ^ u by 5,500 feet.
The Great Lakes Steel Corp. Ecorse plant vas discharging iron
oxide to the Detroit River. It was visible for 1 mile downstream.
150 Logs in the Rouge River near Scott Paper Company were
blocking the Old Channel for email boat navigation.
Date; October 23, 1968
From Celeron Island to the Detroit River Light (6 miles) the
water appears clear and clean.
Oil was observed on the Raisin River in the Turning Basin
and for 1,200 feet downstream.
Date: October 31, 1968
Above the Rouge River on the Detroit River the water appeared
clean. Below, it was brownish with scum and sewage.
A large oil slick in the Bollards Reef Channel was spotted.
however, the source was not located.
Date; November 1, 1968
In the Rouge River the Old Channel looks good. Oil films were
observed in the Ford Slip and near Edward Levy Bros.
17k
-------
Date; November 7, 1968
Rovice River appears relatively clean, no debris, very little
oil and very little iron oxide, even in the Turning Basin. Oil
was trapped "behind both skimmers at Roulo Creek. Some oil was
outside the skimmers and covered an area 60' long by 30' vide.
Date; November 12, 1968
The Detroit River war, fairly clean looking except for mats
of grassy weeds. Iron oxide was light from Ecorse Creek to Great
Lakes Steel.
Date; November 1*;, 1958
Multi-colored oil was observed on the Detroit River. Semet
Solvay (W100), the Rouge River, and Great lakes Steel at Ecorse
seemed to be the major sources of this large oil film.
The lower Rouge River between the Old Channel and the mouth
had a slight film of oil covering 85-90$ of the water surface.
Traces of oil were observed along the entire length of the Rouge
River. There was a heavy collection of oil behind the oil skimmers
at Roulo Creek covering an estimated area of 5,000 sq. feet.
Date; November 15, 1958
The Raisin River had oil and grey paper mill wastes on it.
The Lake Erie beaches were in fair condition. Algae was
growing on the rocks and a blackish brown fiber material was float-
ing along the shoreline.
Date; November 19, 1968
A strong west wind was blowing oils from \FL2k and KL25 out
175
-------
into the Rouge River. The oil film covered 2/3 of the 'river from
the Turning Basin to Jeffereon St. "bridge. The remainder of the
Rouge River was free of cile::cep« for cso1large spot 30' x 80'
near Junction with the Old Channel.
Date; November 21, 1958
Lake Erie "beach vatero vare nuddy due to the high seas.
The RaiBin River was greyish and had come oil on.it. The
.Renault Company vas discharging light oil again.
Date; November 22, 195.9
The Rouge River fron the iiouth to the DT & I Railroad "bridge
had slight traces of oil. Up stream, to the Dlx Street "bridge the
oil was still only in smell amounts. The Turning Basin was covered
with an oil film, and hcr.vy black oil van observed "both inside
and outside of the Fore! nhlrnoro in the Roulo Creek "boat slip.
Grease and oils vero also ccnirrcil upstream on the Rouge River
i
t
near Darling Company.
Date; December 3, 1968
There was a light filn of oil from the mouth to the head of
Ford slip. Darling Ccnprjay was also discharging grease.
Date; December 12, 1958
The Raioin River from the Truning Basin to the mouth vas covered
rith oil and a light tonnish grease. Renault Company vas discharging
kerosine.
176
-------
Date; December 13> 1968
There vas black oil coming out of Ibrd Motor Company's outfall
(W122) in unusually large quantities. The Turning Basin vas rust
color and covered vith oil. There vas also a heavy oil slick near
the Ford skimmer below Gate #11.
177
-------
Action taken on Field Observations
Date: March 6, 1968
A heavy oil click c:i the Dctiuit River vac observed at DT 8.7W.
The Michigan Water Resource- Conniscion vac notified, however, the
source of the oil vac not ctir covered.
Date; June 7> 1968
One hundred gallonc of oil vas spilled into the Detroit River
near the Norfolk and Western Railvay dock. Approximately 150 gallonc
vas also trapped on t,hri pf-.'-- .----, of the S/S MANITOWOC during refuel-
ing operationB. The trapped oil vac recovered, but the Marine
Pollution Control could not locate the original oil loot overboard.
Date; June 11, 1968
A large oil spill on the Kouge River vas discovered and the MWRC
notified. The nourcc of the oil vac not found.
Date; June 12, 1956
A black oil vac found neur the Oakvood pumping station drain.
The MWRC vao notified, but the source is unknovn.
Date; July 11, 1968
A vhite milky cvfDetcnce containing 1700 mg/1 phenolic vastes
vas issuing from Monguagon Creek and floving dovn the Detroit River.
The MWRC vas informed. After further investigation the MWRC said
they vould contact the Pennsalt Corporation, the probable source.
Date; August 12, 1968
Heavy black oils on the Rouge River near Shell Oil Company vcn
observed. The U.S. Coast Guard, MWRC, Corps of Engineers and Regional
178
-------
office of the FWPCA were notified. The oil was trapped and disposed
of by Marine Pollution Control. Shell Oil Company paid for the
clean-up.
Date; September 20, 1968
Large amounts of oil on the Rouge River were traced to the Ford
Motor Company. The MWRC was contacted. Marine Pollution Control
contained and removed the oil.
Date; October 18, 1968
Oil was observed being discharged by M/V ALFREDO PRIMO. The
U.S. Coast Guard was called. Samples were taken pending further action.
Date; October 22, 1968
An estimated 200 logs were floating loose on the Rouge River
near Scott Paper Company. The U.S. Coast Guard and MWRC were notified.
Date; October 23, 1968
Oil on the Raisin River was unusually heavy. The source was
not located. The MWRC was informed of the large amounts of oil.
Date; November ifr, 1968
Seaet Solvay (W100) was discharging black oily water into the
Detroit River. The MWRC was notified and samples were collected of
the effluent pending further action.
Date; November 1**, 1968
Great Lakes Steel Strip Mill (wlt3-M) was discharging a black
oily effluent. The MWRC was notified and samples of the effluent
were collected.
179
-------
Sate; December 12, 1968
The Renault Import Company was found to be discharging volatile
kerosine into the Raisin River Turning Baoin. The MWRC vac notified
and furnished with a ccmple of the effluent. The effluent was found
to contain kerosine.
As a direct result of our 1968 field observations, Shell Oil
Company located a "broken oil line near their Rouge River terminal.
The repair of this pipe line vill "benefit both Shell Oil Company and
the Rouge River - Detroit R-'.v^^ irater quality. The heavy oils near
the Oakwood Pumping station canal that were co often observed in
1968, should be absent in 1969.
180
-------
FIGURE 10
-------
CO
ro
Station:
Date
8-21
9-16
10-30
8-21
9-16
10-30
Average
8-21
9-16
10-30
B-21
318
25.0
TABLE 9
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
River Raisin
Parameter: Temperature C
T-8U
T-85
T-86
T-6
T-8Q
25-
22.
11.
20
, 28
26
25
k
10
1
o 25.0
5 21.0
0 10.5
Parameter:
20
25
22
22
Parameter:
5
4
2
25.0
21.0
10.5
Chloride
20
25
23
23
Phenol u
' 1^
h
2
25-5
21.0
10,5
Eg/1
£*;';
3;
22
26
g/1
2
2
1
25.0
20.5
10.5
20
25
23
23
1
9
1
FWPCA, LHBO
Average
-------
Station:
Date
8-21
9-16
10-30
Average
8-21
9-16
10-30
Average
8-21
9-16
10-30
B-2L
B-18
TABLE 9
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
River Raisin
Parameter: Total Phosphates rag/1
T-85
T-86
T-8
T-89
.76 .76
.92 .82
I.k 1.0
..0 .86
Parameter:
.52 .5^
.71 .69
1.2 .87
.81 .70
Parameter:
2.0 1.9
.1 .6
'A ..3
1.2
.80
1.0
1.0
7*
75
95
.81
.76
.75
.96
.82
Total Soluble Phosphate;
1.0
.68
.89
.85
Nitrate
1.8
5
.5
5*
.73
.82
.69
mg/1
1.6
.5
.k
.52
.62
.81
.65
1.8
.h
.3
FWPCA, LHBO
Average
.8
.8
-------
Station:
Date
8-21
9-16
10-30
Average
8-21
9-16
10-30
Average
B-21
Bl8
TABLE 9
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
River Raisin
Parameter: Annonia-IT ng/1
T-81*
T-85
T-86
.69
.59
55
39
T-89
3^
50
29
38
78
78
51
.12
.15
.22
.16
Foraneter:
.69
.65
.1*1*
.23
.31
.16
.23
Organic -IT
.56
.61
.1*9
.30
.27
.29
-r?
ET/l
.£2
.55
.1*1
.27
.26
.13
.22
.20
59
.^3
FWPCA, LHBO
8-21
9-16
10-30
Parameter: Total Coliform MF/100 ml
lio 130 k6,ooo 18,000 23,000 35,ooo 20,000
530,000 170,000 250,000 119,000 17,000
180,000 1*7,000 1*9,000 60,000 2,000
Median
180,000 1*7,000 1*9,000 1*9,000 17,000
-------
CO
VJ1
Station:
Date
8-21
9-16
10-30
Average
8-21
9-16
10-30
Average
8-21
9-16
10-30
B-21
B-18
TABLE 9
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
River Eaisin
Parameter: COD mg/1
T-84
1-85
T-86
T-6
T-89
42 37
44 23
26 23
37 28
Parameter:
410 430
510 480
1*70 450
460 450
Parameter:
350 360
490 460
450 440
77
25
27
^3
31
23
19
24
35
21
20
25
Total Solids mg/1
420
450
450
440
Dissolved
350
420
440
430
450
450
44o
Solids
370
420
44o
44o
44o
450
44o
mg/1
380
410
440
FWPCA, LHBO
Average
1*30
420
400
410
4io
-------
Station:
Date
8-21
9-16
10-30
Average
8-21
9-16
10-30
Average
B-2L
B-18
TABLE 9
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
River Raisin
Parameter: Suspended Solids tag/1
T-85
T-86
T-89
57
23
12
31
71
25
11
36
Parameter:
2.3
.66
v>
l.l
2.3
.90
M
1.2
70
31
h
35
Iron Eg/1
2.3
1.1
.37
1.3
61
#
9
3r
2-°
l.k
.36
1.3
63
32
8
3^
2.3
1.3
.3':-
1.3
FWPCA, LHBO
-------
FIGURE 1 1
^l//1'
Detroit River Lt.
SCALE IN MILES
110 I -2 3~" ~~4~~5
L43
/" To I e d o ,
,;'Horbor Lt.
LAKE HURON BASIN OFFICE
LOCATION OF SAMPLING STATIONS
LAKE ERIE
U.S. DEPARTMENT Of THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
GREAT LAKES RE8ION J3ROSSE ILE, MICHIGAN
187
-------
H
CD
Co
-Station:
Date
5-13 .
6-6
6-10
7-9
8-21
8-23
9-12'
9-17
10-7
U-16
5-13
6-6
6-10'
7-9
8-21-
8-23
9-12
9-17
10-7
Avero:r
220
280
250
L8
220
320
280
TABLE 10
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Erie Surface Water . 0
Parameter:
LIT
L20
8.0
11.5
16.0
19-5
21.0
23-5
-
18.0 '
20.0
133
10.5
12.0
15.5
21.5
21.0
2^.0
-
18.0
20.0
13-0
11.0
' 11.5.
' 1*K5 '
21.5
' -21.J
2k.Q
.. - -
. 18.0
20.0
1*1.0
10.0
12.5
15.0
2^.5-
20.5
-.2l».5
-
18.0
..
' 1*1.0.
11.0
. 15.0
16.5
2*J.5
21., 5
26.0
. 27.5
17.5
.
12.5
10,0
12.5
16,0
2'».0
.20,5
2SO
2C 0
lo.O
_
1*1.0
28.0
Paraneter: "Conductivity- umhos/cn
2*JO
2nO
2*40
280
2*JO :
350
260
2*10 .
-30'0
280
*fOO
220
250
290 .
2**0
300 ' ;
.' 29°
290
260
260
310
Wo
280
260
300
290
290
220.
2*JO
280
230
280.
270
320
290
320
320
280
.270
L21
260-
360
250
320
230
250
230
FWPCA, LHBO
L23
8.0
13-5 .
16.5
19.0
21.5
2l|.C
19-0
20.0
I**. 0
11.0
13.0
16.5
2h.O
21.5
25.0
19.0
1*UO
360
350
280
250
300
330
310
' L25'
28.0
-------
Station:
L26
LhO
TABLE 10
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Erie Surface Water
Parameter:
Temperature °C
Lte
T80
FWPCA, LHBO
M
00
VO
it-16-
5-13
6-6
6-10
7-9
8-21
8-23
9-12
9-17 .
10-7,
Average
11.0
lU.O
18.0
2^.5'
21.0
26.0
27.5
18.0
llf.O
10.0
12.0
-
2H.O
20.5
2^.5
25.5
ill. 5
9.5-
13.0
16.0
23.5
21 .-G
26.0
27.0
1^.5
9-5 '
13.5
j.6.0
£3.0
21.0
2-5.5
27.5
1^.0
9-5
13-5
17.0
23.0' '
21.0
26.0
27.5
lJ.O '.
lU.O
16.0
. 17.5
26.0
23.0
' .26.0
13-0
Parameter: Conductivity umlios/cni
300
350
350
320
290
,280
270
280
270
250
230
330
3^0
2^0
JOO
250
320
330
280
290
260
330
3^0
280
290
520
500
580
520
520
320
320
270
270 .
320
290
310
300
300
300
3^0
500
-------
Station:
Date
TABLE 10
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Erie Surface Uater
Parameter: Chlorides rag/1
L8
L9
101
LlU
10.7
L20.
121
FWPCA, LHBO
L23
It -16
5-13
6-6
6-10
7-9 '
8-21
H 8-23
'S 9-12
9-17
10-7
Average
it-l6
5-13
6-6
6-10
" 7-9
8-21
8-23
9-12
9-17
10-7
Average
18
12
_
19
22
11
'
-
12:
19
16
2 "
2
M
3
k
6
-
-
'3
2
3
22
17
_
20
20
. 16-
-
-
it
19
18
2
2
2
7
5
_
-
5
6
It
26
Q
_
21
20
13
-
-
12
17
17
1
2
3 '
5
_
-
3
3
3
25
25
23
18
16
. -
-
-
18
21
Parameter:
2
2
^
3 .
if
6
_
_
-
6
u
20
29
25
19
20
-
-
-
18
22
Phenol
1
1
_
18
6
8 .
;
..
_
6
7
2'l
22
"
2^
17
'
-
_
16
21
ug/1
< 1
3
.5
'6
5
«.
_
8
5
2it
M
M / H
.- ' -16
33
2H
1
- _
20
12
25
- ' ' h
11
9
5
» «
' M
3
8
6
21
23
25
19
, 19
_
«
20
21
1
3
1
2
6
7
3
L25
-------
t *
Average
U-16
5-13
6-6 .
6-10
7-9
8-21
8-23
9-12
9-17
10-7
Averc,-;e
L26
19
20'
3'
1
5
5
15
10
7
18
20
1
3
9
k
5
TABLE 10
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Erie Surface Water
Parameter: Chlorides mg/1
T80
20
22
22
20
19
22
19
25 '
20
16
16 .
22
23?
18
17
id-
21
22 ':
17 . -
- 17 ,
22
20
21
18 .
18
25
31
:23
19
"21.
19 - 19 19 ! 20
19 -L9 20" 23
Parameter: Phenol ug/1
1
1
3
5
5
< l
2
3
2
k
< 1
1
6
2
V
2
1
9
^
1
T
5
20
6
5
'3
8
h
10
5
FWPCA, LHBO
-------
H
VQ
to
Station:
Date
5-13
6-6.
- 6-10-
.7-9
8-21
' 8-23-
9-12
'9-17
10-7
Average
8-23
9-12
10-7
Average
TABLE 1(P
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS ' : "
Lake Erie Surface Hater . ' .
Parameter: Dissolved Oxygen Top ng/1
FWPCA, LHBO
L6
8.6 '
8.'5
T*9'
8.5
,8. H
L8
7.6
8.7;
'6.9
8.9
8.0
^ '
9.8
.9-5
7.1
9.1
8.9
m .
6.1*
9.6
. 8.1
8.9'
8.3
Parameter:
6.8
8.3 .
6.7
8.8 ,
7.1
9-0
7.8
8.7
UAV
7-2
10.0
12.7
9-8
10. V
10.2
Dissolved
5-7
9.0
10.3
L17 L20
6.0 -
9.5 - -
10, !i 11.8
8.0 . -
.8.8 - .
8.6 . -
Oxygen Bottom ffig/1
lO'.l 9-7
8.2
8.6
\
L2L
8.9 .'
.6.8
6.9
8. It
8.0
6.8
B.k
L23
.7.1
. 10.7
' 8.0
' 9-7
:8l9 '
7.7
9.3
L25
*
-
12.3
" -
9-*
8.3:
9.0
-------
vo
Station:
Date
TABLE 10
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Erie Surface Water
Paraneter: Dissolved Oxygen Top og/1
FWPCA, LHBO
L26
1*3
T80
6-6
6-10
7-9
8-21
8-23
9-12
' 10-7
' Average
8-23
9-12 .
10-7
6.5
-
. 9-9 '
-
12.7
8.2
9.8
9A'
7.6
- .. -
9.2
7.3
_
9.2
_
'11.3
_
":9 A
9-3
10.3
-
9.0
7.1
_
10.1
_ s
ll.lt
_
9-2
9*
9.4
9.0
- 7.5
10.5
_
12.0,
_
9-2
9.8 .
Paraneter:
5-8
-
9.0
8.0
_
9-1
_
10.5
: _
-.9.2 '
9.2
Dissolved
5-9 '
-
, 9.1
h.6
_
6.3
«
. _
' _
9.2
6.7
Oxygen
-
3-3
* ^~
l
. .\
'-;
Bottota mg/1
-------
TABLE 10 -
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS , .
Lake Erie Surface Water . .''".
Parameter: Total Soluble POli np7l
.... ^' . FWPCA, LHBO
Station:
Date
1;-16
5-13
6-6 .
6-10
7-9
8-21 .
8-23
9-12
9-17
10-7
Average
lf-16 -
5-13
6-6
6-10
7-9
8-21
8-23
9-12
9-17
10-7
Average
. .
.20
.21
'
.17
.31
.22
-
_
.15
3.5*
.21
.28
.27 .
_ .
.17 '
.33
.28
-
-.
.22
U.I*
.26
Ljb
30
.22
-
'.20
.16
.15
-
-
.26
.95*
.22
.38
.25
_
.22
.2k
.20
-
-
.35
1.1*
.29
£2
- -
.36
.08
_'
.12
.21
.It9
-
-
.22
.69
-31
M
.15
_
.16
.30
53
-
.27
.79
33
LJLL
.21
.29
.20
.17
. -17
_
_
.28
.22
Parameter:
.25
36.
_
.22
.26
.22
_
_
_
.39
.28
L14
.20
.25
.l''t
.12
.23
_
_
.16
.18
Total PC
30
,lf5
M
.17
.21;
.30
_
_
_
.27
.29
10.7 L'^O
1
.18
37
t ' ! ','
.15
*-'' i
_ _
_ _
.15
.20
\ ns/l
.23
.in-
.21;
.hh
.21
_ _
_ _
.. _
.25
-30
LclL
.18
.62 '
,
.21
-.33
.28
_
_
' .30
.38
.to.
.31
.79 .
.27
.93
37
_
- .39
.50
VelS
.26
»'^3
,2h
.15
.17
_
..
,20
.21;
.37
.52
.2k
.19
.21;
_ *
_
-
.3^
.32
^ifot averaged
-------
Station:
Date
L2o
TABLE 10
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Erie Surface Water
Parameter: Total Soluble PO^ ns/1
lAl
JA2
1*3
T80
4-16
5-13
6-6
6-10
7-9
8-21
8-23
9-12
10-7
Average
lj-16
5-13
6-6
6-10
7-9
8-21
8-23
9-12
9-17
10-7
Average
.23
.23 .
_
..26
.19
.16
- x
-.16
.21
.35
.38
»
.32 '
3^
.25
-
-
-
.27
-.32
.23
.32
_
.11
. .13
.13
- .
-
.19
.19
.29
.37
*
;i2
.18
.18
-
-
-
-.19
.22
.12
.19
M
.20
.17
.2k
-
. -
.29
.20
.16
.30
J
.".27
.22
33
-
'
-
.29
.25
. - .11
.HS
_
.21
.16
. .17
-
-
.25
.22
Parameter:
.17
53
.27
.2k
.26
-
-
-
.25
.29
.16
.21
- .'
.18
.22 -
.20
.
r
.21
.20
Total PO
.22
.3k
.2k
.32
.28
-
-
-
.33
.29
55
.36
_
52
.kk
: .^9
-
. -
.23
" .U3
k *&b
.72
57
.66
5^
.63
-
-
-
.3^
'58
FWPCA, LHBO
-------
TABLE 10
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Erie Surface Water
Parameter: Nitrate (170 _-Il)
FWPCA, LHBO
H
Station:
Date
Ij-l6
5-13
6-6
6-10
7-9
8-21
8-23
9-17
10-7
Average
l£
.h
3
_
.k
.5
.2
-
.2
3
.3
L8
1.8
.3
_
' .2
1.1
.2
-
.2
.1
' .6
- L9
1.6
.3
-
.2
1.0
.2
-
.1
.2
5
Lll
1.2
3
-
.If
.3
.2
-
-
.1
3
Si
1.3
1.1
-
7
.2
.1
-
-
.1
.6
L17
9
.8
-
.6
.1
.1
-
-
.2
.5
L20 L21
3
3
' -
.2
.3
.2
-
.1
.2
.2
L23
1.6
.8
.2
3
.1
.1
.3
L25
Parameter: Ammonia (HH_-ll) cig/1
h-16
5-13
6-6
6-10
7-9
8-21
8-23
9-12
9-17
10-7
Average
.22
. .21
H
< .05
.35
31
-
-
.25
.27
.2k
.16
25
_
< .05
.20
.23
- .
-
30
.35
.21
.17
.09
_
.73
.19
.17
-
-
.26
.19
.26
.Ik
.22
-
< .05
.25
.15
.21
.17
.11
.21;
-
< .05
.09
59
-
.20
.21
.22
.17
-
< .05
.08
.27
-
'.25
.17
.31
.li6
< .05
.52
.33
w ^»
H
»>£"
36
.24
.32
.22
.12
< .05
< .05
.32
.16
.15
-------
Station:
L26
L4o
TABLE 10
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Erie Surface Water
Parameter: Hitrate (ITO -IT) 103/1
L42
L43
FWPCA, LHBO
T80
Date
H
VO
-I
4-16 '
5-13
6-6
6-10
7-9
8-21
10-7
. . 1.4
1-3
_
2-7
. 1-5
-.1
.2
X1
.5
.4
«
.4.
.5
.1.
.1
5
1.1
*
2.3
< .1
.2
.1
~" .»5-
.9
2.3
.9
.1
.1
^\
.6 .
1.3
2.3
1.1
.1
.1 -.
1.4
.6
1.8
1.3
'1.1
.1
Average
1.2
.7
.8
9
Parameter: Ammonia (HEL-IT) mg/1
If-l6
5-13 .
6-6
6-10
7-9
8-21 :
10-7
Average
' . .14
< .05
_
< .05
< .05
.2k
.13
11
.11. '
.13.
_
< .05
.07
.21
."09
.11
. .06
.. -19
- . .23
< .05 .
>30
.20
.17
.10
.10
~
< .05
< .05
.37
.22
.15
.08
.11
. _
< .05 .
.05
.39
.24
.15
.lit
.25
' -.14
.07
.43
.29
.22
-------
TABLE 10
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Erie Surface Uater
Station:
Date
5-13
6-6
6-10 .
7-9
8-21'
8-23-
9-12
9-17
10-7
Average
h-16
5-13
6-6. .
6-10
7-9
8-21
8-23
9-12
9-17
10-7
Median
L6
< .05
< .05
< .05
.19
.32 -
.21
'; -
5000
3oO.'
2500
92000
17000
180000
'5000
L8
< .05.
< .05
< .05
< .05
.35
.25
- .58
" -
. 82
3300
'120
ho
iho
> 20000
100
120
Parameter:
L9 Ell
.05 < .05
< .05 . .05
< .05 .OS
.h9 < .05-
.31 . J?8_
.25 . - '
.27 ,1»9
.21 - .20
. Parameter:
300 2
92 ho
22 2
90
180 31*
>1200
hjo 30
180 30
Or~anic-ir
LlU
< .05
< .05
.07
< .05
70.
.i~5 ';
-
ns/1
L17
< .05
< .05
< .05
< .05
. -55
.28
-
Total Conform
560 '
. 710
10
3.
no
82
2
23
< 2
8
5
12
7
L20 L2L
.06 .
< .65
- " < .05 <
< .05 . <
. .30 .
. - : ,27
.... .28 '
.15
1 MF/100 nl
13000
130-
. - 620
12000
130000
5^(0000 .
13000
FWPCA, LHBO
L23 L25
.05 ''-.'.
.09
.05 ' -
.05
.39 ' - . .
.56 ,: ; I ".,,
.20 -
510
9 -
7 : . -
2300 f
39
-------
Average
U-16
5-13
6-6 .
6-10
7-9
8-21
8-23
9-12
9-17
10-7
Median
L26
.62
39.
130
1*2
10
16
3
18
17
TABLE 10
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Erie Surface tfater
Parameter: Organic-N mg/1
T80
FWPCA, LHBO
.07
.17
.25
.1*6
.17
.22
10
6.
1"
3
10 .
1*0
6
.06
.07
< .05
1.5
~*6
.41
8
. 12
10-
5
. < 1
10
9
.06
< .05
< .05
< .05
.93
.i
.27
Parameter:
12
2
8
> 1
10
'9
< .05
.06
< .05
< .05
.77
IT*/
2^1-
Total
10
82
18
18
6
30
18
< .05
< .05
< .05
< .05
-.78
.78
.27 .
Coliform MF/100 ml
1*600 .
. , ^500
> 210000
68000
32000
1*8000
-------
TABLE 10 . ' .
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS ' -
Lake Erie Surface Uater . ". .' - '" ' ' '
Parameter: iron Eg/1 ' '
... . .- . - , .. FWPCA, LHBO
Station: L£ L6 L9 Ell Ll4 L17 L20 L21 L23 L25
Date . .- ' ' -
ro
0
o
4-16
. 5-13
6-6
6-10
. ' 7-9 '
8-21
8-23
9-12
9-17
10-7
Average
.40
.27 .
.11
.63
.40
-
- ,
51
1.9*
39
.83
37
.17
52
.22
- -
"-
.49
.90
5Q
.86
.20
^
.12
.26
.19
-
.31
1.0
.42
.24
.34
_
.11
.23
.09
-
' ' -
.42
.24
1.1
1.4
_
.09
32
25
-
-
.64
.63
.35
.33 .
'.11
' .1:0
. .35
--
- - :
.67.
-34
- ' ..96
-: - . . .86
f
-' '' ' .51 '
-.1.1
. .84
_ .' _
_
- .63
- - 1.5
.91
1.3
71
.12
.30
.17
_
-
' .96
59
Parameter: Sulfate mg/1
10-7 17 27 19 25 ' 27 20 - 16 28
-------
ro
Q
Station:
Date
10-7
L26
27
TABLE 10
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Erie Surface Water
Parameter: Iron
LfcL
T80
4-16
5-13
6-6
6-10 ''.
7-9
8-21
8-23
9-12
9-17
10-7
Average
1.0
1.4
. _
.25
55
,16
_ ..
' ' ' ~,
, .68;
.67
..37
.32
_
.08
.34
..11
-
_
55
.30
.44
.52
.34
.23
.33.;.
^
.32
.36 . !
35
.92
. .37
.17
' "
.36
.42
.41
1.0
.34
57
.15
^ ^
.38
.48
95
93
.49
.c^
' *S
'
'
.58
.77
15
Parameter:
26 25
Sulfate mg/1
25 32
FWPCA, LHBO
-------
TABLE 10
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Erie Surface Water
Parameter: Turbidity JCU
FWPCA, LHBO
ro
o
ro
Station:
Date
k-16
5-13
6-6 '
6-10
7-9 '
8-21
8-23
9-12
9-17
10-7
Average
' '*
. '. ' -
1 < 25*
h
_
3
15
6
' _
-
. 10-'
23
I
10
L8
27 .
'5
- .
3
15
h-
_
_
10
.1^
11
^
,
27 .
h
^
2
6
3
.
6.
12
9'
in
< 25*'
4
«
2
5
^^
M
-
5 ' .
^
L3A
37 .
35
3
10
.15
_
_
20
20
L17
< 25*
. 6
_
r%
b
^
' '
.
15
.7
L20 L21
< 25
10
- '. 6
.15
15
- »
- " -
- 5
10
L23 L25
38
15. .
5
10
l»..--
1
-
10
10 . -
.lit -
-------
8
U)
Average
*Not Averaged
L26
TABLE 10
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Lake Erie Surface Water
Parameter: Turbidity JCU
LU3 ' T80
FWPCA, LHBO
27
30.
7
15
15
< 25*
5
2
.5
3
< 25*
10
&
5
20
< 25*
20
10
T
10
< 25*
25
8
15.
15
32
25
8
25
"20
15
18-
10
5
10
11
10
n
15
lit
15
21
-------
MICHIGAN
WYANDOTTE
TRENTON
DT3.9-
\
LAKE \ ERIE
LAKE HURON BASIN OFFICE
LOCATION OF SAMPLING STATIONS
DT 3:9- R66 S R77
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
GREAT LAKES-REGION QROSSE ILE, MICHIGAN
204
-------
-.CABLE 11
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Monguagon Creek
FWPCA, LHEO
Date 30* Upstream from mouth of Creek fro* Out into Detroit River
Temperature ( C) .
7-11 20.0 18.0
Phenol (ug/l)
7-H 1700 23
Chlorides (mg/l)
to
° 7-12 99 67
Suspended Solids
7-12 130
Oil and Grease (mg/l)
7-12 3
-------
Date
Tine
Lab lib.
Table 12
1968 Sanple Analysis Results
Dissolved Oxygen Svorvey at IT 3.9 (ROD)
Dissolved Oxygen
TOTJ Bottom.
FWPCA, LHEO
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
ro 8-5
&8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5 '
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
8-5
10:00
10:05
11:00
11:05
12:00
12:05
13:00
13:05
14:00
14:05
15:00
15:05
16:00
- 16:05
17:00
17:05
.18:00
18:05
19:00
19:05
20:00
20:05
' 21:00
21:05
22:00
22:05
23:00
23:05
24.00
32581
32582
32583
32584
32585
32566
32587
32588
32589
32590
32591
32592
32593
32594
32595
32596
32597
32598
32599
32600
32601
32602
32603
326o4
' 32605
32606
32607
32608
32609
21*. 0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
2k. 0
2k. 0
24.5
24.5
2b.5
2k.5
2*1.5
2*1.0
2^.0
2U.O
mg/1
V.5
U-5
^.5
5.1
5-0
5.0
5-2
h.6
k. 7 .
5.0
5.0
4.8
7.1
7-3
7-3
^ saturation mg/1 $ saturation
5^
5^
54
61
60
60
62
58
86
88
88
5-6
5-0
5.2
5.2
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0 60
5-1
' fc.7 57
5-0
4.5 5^
. 7.0 85
-7.3 ' 88 .
-------
Table 12
' 1968 Sample Analysis Results
Dissolved Oxygen Survey at DT 3*9 (R66)
Date
8-6
8-6
8-6
8-6
8-6
8-6
8-6
8-6
8-6
8-6
8-6
^8-6
^8-6
8-6
8-6
8-6
8-6
Time
24:05
01:00
01:05
02:00
02:05
03:00
03:05
04:00
04:05
05:00
05:05
06:00
06:05
07:00
07:05
08:00
08:05
Lab No.
32610
' 32611
32612
32613
32ol4
32615
32616
32617
32618
32619
32620
32621
32622
32623
32625
32626
' Temp. "
(°c)
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
27.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
Top
mg/1
.6.9
6.2
4.3
5-6
5.2
3.8
3-9
3.9
Dissolved
% saturation
83
74
52
67
62
.46
47
47
Oxygen
mg/1
7.1
5-9
5.6
4.8
5.0
5.8
5-5
3.9
3.8
Bottom FWPCA. LHEO
$ saturation
85
71
67
58
j»m
64
70
j* >*
66
47
46
-------
Table 12
ro
Date
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-15
Tir.e
09:00
09:05
10:00
10:05
11:00
11:05
12:00
12:05
13:00
13:05
l*i:00
l*t:05
15:00
15:05
16:00
16:05
17:00
17:05
18:00
18:05
19:00
19:05
20:00
20:05
21:00
21:0p
22:00
22 . ^5
lab IIo.
33600
33601
33602
33603
3360*J
33605
33606
33607
33608
33609
33610
33611
33612
33613
336l*l
33615
33616
33617
33618
33619
33620
33621
33622
33623
3362k
33625
33626
33627
1968 Sample Analysis Results
Dissolved 0:r.-Sen Survey at DT 3-9 (R66)
Tenp. Dissolved Oxygen
(°C) Top Bottom E7PCA, LHBO
22.0
22.0
22.0
21:0
22.5
22.0
23.0
23.0
23.0
23.0
2*t.O
23.5
2k. 5
2k.O
2*^.5
2k. 5
2k.O
2k.o
2k.O
2k.O
2k.o
2k. 0
2k.O
2k.O
2k. 0
2k. 0
2*1.0
2^.0
ES/1
6.6
6.9
6.8
5-0
k.l
5-2
k.7
k.6
5.1
5.2
5-1
5.5
5-8
k.6
$ saturation ng/1
76
79
79
59
55
62
57
56
61
62
61
66
70
55
6.6
7.0
6.9
5.1
k.5
5.0
k.6
k.k
5.0
5.1
5.1
5.^
6.7
5.6
'jo saturation
76
79
79
60
53
60
55
53
60
61
61
65
80
67
-------
Table 12
1968 Sample Analysis Results
Dissolved Oxygen Survey at DT 3-9 (K66)
Date Time Lab Ho. Temp. Dissolved Oxygen
( C) Top $ Saturation Bottom £ Saturation
8-15
8-15
8-15
8-16
8-16
8-16
8-16
8-16
8-16
8-16
8-16
8-16
8-16
8-16
.8-16
8-16
8-16
8-16
8-16
8-16
8-16
8-16
23:00
23:05
2l*:00
00:05
01:00
01:05
02:00
02:05
03:00
03:05
Ol*:00
Ol*:05
05:00
05:05
06:00
06:05
07:00
07:05
08:00
08: 05
09:00
09:05
33628
33629
33630
33631
33632
33633
33631*
33635
33636
33637
33638
33639
3361*0
3361*1
3361*2
3361*3
3361*1*
3361*5
3361*6
3361*7
3361*8
3361*9
23.5
23.5
23-5
23-5
23-5
23-5
23.5
23.5
23.5
23.5
23-5
23.5
23-5
2l*. 0
2l*.0
2l*.0
2l*.0
2l*.0
2l*.0
2l* »0
pli A
Oil Q
5.8
5.6
5-5
5.6
5-5
5.6
5.1
i*.9
1*.6
5.0
5.0
69
67
65
67
65
67
61
59
55
60
60
5-7
5.6
5.1*
5.1*
5.6
5.6
1*.8
5.1
1*»5
5-1
5.0
68
67
6k
6k
67
67
58
61
5k
61
60
-------
1968 Bottom Sediment Analysis Results
The following section presents suplimentary data to the
previously published 1968 Dredging Stxidy Report. (DPO 31-A).
Also included are bottom sediment analyses of proposed Corps
of Engineers dredging sites and water chemical analyses near
dredge disposal areas at Grassy Island and Toledo Harbor.
210
-------
Table 13
Effects of Open Water Spoil Disposal
On Water Quality
Detroit River Station R?7 (OT 3-9)
Sept. 24-25, 1968
(03/1 unless noted)
Lab Number Conductivity
(urnhos/cci)
P
H
395^2
395^3
395^4
395^5
395^6
Average
395M
15 min.
360
320
300
280
290
310
250
24 hrs.
360
340
360
280
290
326
240
Phenols
Dissolved Oxygen
BOD
(us/1)
15 rain.
25
12
11
12
7
13
3
24 hrs.
27
7
1U
5
-
13
2
15 min.
3«9
5
.h
.4
1.8
l.l»
8.0
24 hrs.
.1
2.9
2.3
2.2
2.9
2.1
7.8
15 rain.
-
23
32
15
ih
21
3
24 hrs
-
5
4
5
5
5
1
-------
Table 13
Effects of Open Water Spoil Disposal
On Water Quality
Detroit River Station R77 (D 3.9)
Sept. 24-25, 1968
(dg/1 unless noted)
Lab Number Total PP. Total Sol. FO), Aosonia-II Organic-IT
P
39542
39543
39544
39545
395*16
Average
39541
15 nin.
19
10
9-9
6.0
6.2
10.2
.23
24 hrs.
4.4
.56
92
.86
73
1.49
.24
15 tain.
2.2
1-5
1.8
1.2
1.7
1.6
.19
24 hrs.
1-7
.19
.17
32
36
.55
.12
15 rnin.
8.8
2.3
2-5
1.1
1.6
3.3
4.8
24 hrs. 15 nin. 24 hrs.
6.0
1.5
2.6
1.2
_
2.8
1.7
-------
Table 13
Effects of Open Water Spoil Disposal
On Water Quality
Detroit River Station R77 (DT 3«9)
Sept. 24-25, 1968
(mg/1 unless noted)
(3
Lab Number Total Coliform
" (MF/100 ml)
395^2 '
395^3
39544
39545
39546
Average
39541
15 min.
800,000
80,000
87,000
86,000
71,000
-
80 ,"000
24 hrs.-
150,000,000
34,ooo
27,000
38,000
28,000
-
31,000
Iron
15 min.
31
85
90
71
79
71
.40
24 hrs.
4-5
3-5
, 10.0
5-8
6.2
.6.0
-.12
Sulfate
15 min.
24
34
36
25
26
29
18
24 hrs.
22
20
23
17
21
21
15
Turbidity
(J.C.U. )
15 min.
45
150
: 126
200
200
144
6
24 hrs.
30
35
80
40
47
46
5
-------
Table 13
Effects of Open Water Spoil Disposal
On Mater Quality
Detroit River Station RJ7 (DT 3.9)
Sept. 24-25, 1968
(mg/1 unless noted)
Lab Number
39542
39543
39544
39545
39546
Average
39541
Nitrate
15 nin. 24
5
.2
.1
1.5
1.2
0.7 o
3
hrs.
.1
.2
.3
.3
.3
.2
.1 .
COD
15 min. 24
410 1
188
387
109
188
256
8
hrs.
43
29
27
30
30
52
7
15 nin.
7.4
7.8
7-7
7-7
8.0
7-7
8.0
hrs.
7-2
7-3.
7r
* 1
7-3
7-3
7.7
7-7
-------
FIGURE 13
Extent of Sludge
on Sept. 6, 1967
(Discharge)
Overflow
Plpo
GRASSY
ISLAND
I
I
'Welli With
(Recorder
Sampling Pt.
/(50'DoimBtreeAa)
WYANDOTTE
WyandoHe
Wafer fnfefce
FIGHTING
ISLAND
I4.6W
DETROIT PROGRAM OFFICE
LOCATION OF WELLS, SAMPLE POINTS
AND RECORDERS-GRASSY ISLAND
1968 DREDGING PILOT STUDY
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
GREAT LAKES REGION GROSSE ILE, MICHIGAN
215
-------
Table ll*-
1968 Analytical Results
Grassy Island Area
Sludge Disposal Demonstration Project
Sample
Location
Disch
Disch
Disch
50* Downstream
S.E.Corner G.I.
Lat>.
No.
Date
Time
Jemp.
c
PH
s.u.
28565
1*0582
1*0583
1*058!*
1*0585
7-10
9-30
10-1
10-1
10-1
ll*25
151*0
1025
1030
1035
22.0
16.5
17-5
17-5
7.3
7^6
0.0
Cond. Chloride DO
umhos/cm mg/1 mg/1
770
10
10
i*.i*
3.1
9.2
FWPCA, LHF
Total Solv'
FOk
mg/1
.89
5.1
2.5
.69
.39
mg/..
52
30
.23
.39
30
Sample
Location
Disch
Disch
Disch
50' Downstream
S.E.Corner G.I.
Lab.
Ho.
Date
Time
Temp.
C
Total. Fecal Total
Coliform Coliform Solids
MF/100 ml MF/lOOml mg/1
28565
1*0582
1»0583
1*0581*
1*0585
7-10
9-30
10-1
10-1
10-1
11*25
151*0
1025
1030
1035
22.0
_
16.5
17-5
17.5
_
_
11*0,000
290,000
360,000
_
_
16,000
30,000
16,000
210
ll*00
1500
190
150
Dissolved Susp. Iron
Solids Solids mg/1
mg/1 mg/1
170
250
780
160
ll*0
1*1
1100
690*
33
9
1.9
35
19
1.1
.2U
*Included substantial quantity floating solid:
-------
Table lU
1968 Analytical Restilts
Grassy Island Area
Sludge Disposal Demonstration Project
Sample
Location
Disch
Disch
Disch
50' Downstream
S.E.Corner G.I.
Lat.
No.
Date
Time
Temp.
c
Turb.
J.C.U.
Phenols
Grease
& Oil
FHPCA, LHBO
Ammonia Organic Sulf&t-..-
NH,
28565
1*0582
1*0583
1*058!*
1*0585
7-10
9-30
10-1
10-1
10-1
ll*25
151*0
1025
1030
1035
22.0
-
16.5
17-5
17.5
_
260
170
21
9
7
_
3!*
6
5
Nitrogen mg/1
.11
-
20
.47
.23
< .05
_
7-2
38
.27
Ul
107
16
-
Sample
Lab.
Ho.
Date
Disch
Disch
Disch
50' Downstream
S.E.Corner G.I.
Time
28565
1*0582
1*0583
1*058!*
1*0585
7-10
9-30
10-1
10-1
10-1
11*25
151*0
1025
1030
1035
22.0
16.5
17.5
17-5
Volatile Total
Susp. Volatile
Solids Solids
rog/1 mg/1
8
52
-------
-------
- 0 -Table 15 '
- '1958 Analytical. Results
-. Bottom Sediment Core Samples " ..
Detroit &' Rouge River ' ' ' ' " FVTPCAj LHBO" '
[3
vo
SAMPLE
NO.
5
8 '
10
12
13
Area"
Rouge River
Rouge River
Rouge River
Rouge River
Rouge River
' -
"
- -
.
Depth - -
27
27
28
26
26
COLLECT
DATE
9-2U-68
9-2ii-68
9-2^-68
9-2ii-68
9-2i|-68
LAB. NO.
^95°,1
39532
39533
3953^
39535
1
-
'
GROSS DESCRIPTION
Black sludge, oil present; strong Ds and Cs odors '
Black sludge, some oil, strou? Cs
Greyish black sludge, some oil, Ch - -
Brotmish black sludge, oily; Ch \
Bro",7nish black sludge, little oil; Ch and E I
.... _ ' :
' 1
|
"*
- . !»
'
,
--"
.
-------
Table 15
1968 Analytical Results
Bottom Sediment Core Samples
Detroit & Rovi^e River
FHPCA, LHEO
u
_l .
Q. 0
5 -Z.
<
. VI
5
8
10
12
13
IMMED.
DO DEM
Mg/Kg
Wer Basis
210
410
530
590
540
"
COD
Mg/Kg
\Vef Basis
170,000
120,000
100,000
110,000
100,000
.
PHENOLS
^9/Kg
'.Vet Basis
2200
560
1500
2300
1100
TOTAL
P04
Mg/Kg
V/of Basis
7,100
4,500
4,000
'^,300
2,700
TOT. SOL.
P04
Mg/Kg
\Vef Basis
NITRATE
N03-N
Mg/Kg
\Vef Basis
NITRITE
N02-N
Mg/Kg
V/e} Basis
AMMONIA
NH3-N
Mg/Kg
\Vef Basis
5^0
110
120
59
97
ORGANIC
NITROGEN
Mg/Kg
V/ef Basis
_
_
_
-
-
-
IRON
Mg/Kg
V/ef Basis
8.800
42,, 000
45,000
37,000
45,000
OIL a
GREASE
Mg/Kg
Dry Basis
200,000
56,000,
44,000
38,000
41,000
TOTAL
SOLIDS
%
V'/3f Basis
17.6
41.5
42,2
30.7
44.2
"
VOL
SOLIDS
o>
/o
Dry Basic
.
BOC
M
-------
gemp.
c
Ta"ble 15
1968 Analysis Results
Dix Ave Bridge (MP 2.75)
Chloride Phenol Iron
mg/1 ug/1 mg/1
FWPCA, EHBO
Susp. Oil
Solids mg/1
mg/1
Total
Coliform
MF/100 ml
ro
Date
It-It
5-1
5-27
6-11
7-10
1.5
17-0
15.0
29-5
24.0
76
51
43
21
11
5
8.8
6.5
1.2
77
160
13
50
3
3
7
3
170,000
Average
11
7-5
65
-------
MILLMAN
ISLAND
Levee
Sample Points.
of Proposed Channel
For morcVdetail
^r-) see Sheet'SA-
©
SCALE 1:15,000
SOUNDINGS IN FEET
FEET
-POINTE MOUILLEE
DETROIT ','IOGRAM OFFICE
PROPOSE.) DREDGING SITE
SAMPLING POINTS
HURON RIVER
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
OREAT LAKES REGION OROSSE ILE.MICHIGAN
STATE GAME AREA
-------
Table 16 .
1958 Bottom Sediment .Analysis Results
Huron Piver Channel ' < FVJPCA, LHBO
SAMPLE
NO.
1
2 '
3
;-T
5
-
i
§
*
MILE
POINT
1.55
1 .~>7
0.68
CORPS.
DESIGNATION
29-66
2U-66
i»-66
DA.TE
ij- 30-68
U-30-68
i»- 30-68
O.la ! 36-66 ' it-30-68
1 " i
0.13
31-66
^-30-68
LAB. NO.
18513
iSsiU
18515
18511
18512
s
f
4
!
i
!
i
(i,
.
«
--
.
f
TEA1P.
oc
1^.5
lU.S
llt.O
12.5
-12.0
* . "
GROSS DESCRIPTION
(Description; odor)
Z?r.r,:n to rlei-l: r-rav clrdfre: ro^e 0070 K fine sand:E
li'O'.m to dark: '"^a'r nlvd^e: sone onre °- cand; trace
~rs-;el a;-d roots: no odor
Darlc .^rav to "oroT.rii sl^.d^e : nome ooy.e: trace roots;
no odor.
Dar-k rrrav sludge: no odor
.
Dark .3 ray' sludge; trace gravel; no odor
.
. .
.
-------
Tattle 16
ly'3 Zo-tcn Sc-cl Lr.:e:i- Analysis "es-jlt-
Euro" Fiver
LJ
0- 0
2 2
CO
1
2
3
4
5
I MM ED.
DO DEM
Mg/Kg
Vet Basis
42
63
110
120
-
99
COD
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
27,000
26,000
45,000
89,000
60,000
PHENOLS
Wet Basis
< 190
< 190
< 190
480
< 190
TOTAL
P04
Mg/Kg
\Vot Basis
1200
1100
1700
1200
1200
TOT. SOL.
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
11
12
16
16
6.7
*
NITRATE
NOj-N
Mg/Kg
\V3f Oasis
< 7.5
<7.5
-< 7-5
< 7-5
< 7-r;
NITRITE
N02-N
Mg/Kg
,VaI Basis
.2
.2
.1
.2
.1
AMMONIA
NH3-N
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
70
90
130 -
190
140
ORGANIC
NITROGEN
Mg/Kg
Wot Basis
^7
30
69 "
140
5.6
IRON
>/g/Kg
Wot Oasis
6000
6400
6700
7100
7800
,
OIL a
Mg/Kg
Dry Basis
450
360
970
-1800
1500
-
TOTAL
SOLIDS
Wet Basis
69.2
73.0
53-2
35-2
44.2
r.:'ir'-.".>...
VOL
SOLIDS
Dry Oasis
2.9
8.4
6.0
17-9
10.9
.
rE '
S.U.
7.0
7.'1
7.1*
7-8
t
7-4
r\3
-------
LAKE HURON BASIN OFFICE
PROPOSED DREDGING SITE
SAMPLING POINTS
BOLLES HARBOR
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
GREAT LAKES REGION 6ROSSE ILE> MICHIGAN
For more detail
see Sheet 14
___
~
\i3Enlrance Lt Fl R 2
BOLLES
HARBOR
LA PLAISANCE\BAY
SCALE 1:15,000
SOUNDINGS IN FEET
FEET
Avalon Beach
-------
Table 1? -
1 ?££ Analytical Results
Iciton Gee"!liienv, Scrrrplec
ro
ro
OS
SAMPLE
NO.
BO-68-1
EO-68-1
BO-68-2
EO-68-2
EO-68-3
EO-68-3
BO-68-if
EO-68-Jf
BO-68-5
EO-68-5
i
Are^; Water
Dept^
Bolles IFfirbor 6
Bolles Ifrt7:hor 6
" 6
6
,
'" 8
v . y Q
' " 8
" " 8
tt q
" 9
- -
.
Depth - -
6
7 to 8
e>
7 !.o 8 -
8
9 to 10
8
8.5 to 10
9
9 to 10
Bolles
COLLECT
DATE
10-2-68
10-8-68
10-2-68
10-8-68
.
i 0-2-68
10-8-68
10-8-68
10-8-68
10-8-68
10-8-63
f
Hart or
LAB. NO.
JtOTH
JflSl?
1|0572
1(1516
Jf057T
lp 51 5
iH51Jt
2H513
ill 512
1H 511
F./PCA, LHEO"-'
GROSS DESCRIPTION
Dar!t "bro'rn nTvd^e. sone canfl: Cn '
Grey -"black nln.dc; E with slight Cs
C-rev-bro'm 'Incite; no odor
;
Grov_"b7~oi,n-i --'iiirl^o: "5, Cr
Grcv-"bro',m Lud.^e: no odor
Ssr.d vith . .10 li-rfnt "bro'm sLixl^c: sT-'^ht Cs
Lif^ht "broT.r:: jlt:c7-'re; no odor
Ero'-m slud.-o and send; no oclor
Lin;ht "bro'.ii 'cl-.'/I-.-G; -.:; cdoi-
^
( *
-------
-. Table 1?
1958 Analytical Results
Bottom Sediment Samples
Bolles Harbor
3ampl
lo.
BO
58-1
08-1
68-2
68-2
68-3
08-3
68-1*
68-1*
68-5
68-5
3 IMMED.
DO DEM
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
100
30
150
66
160
-30
1*2
21*
.18
21*
COD
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
56,000
30,000
1*3,000
33,000
H, 000
11,000
ll*,000
11,000
17,000
ll*,000
PHENOLS
.t/g/Kg
Wet Basis
< 190
1*10
< 190
380
.
< 190
320
< 190
220
250
< 190
TOTAL
PCU
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
600
1100
1200
1100
1700
1100 -
850
ll*00
680
1300
-
TOT. SOL.
P04
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
.
NITRATE
N03-N
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
.
NITRITE
N02-N .
Mg/Kg
Wei Basis
.
AMMONIA
NH3-N
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
250
52
190
'-
260
60
18
68
26
,
ORGANIC
NITROGEN
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
-
-
-
-'
- ' .-
-
_
_
_
IF: ON
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
6,000
19,000
15,000
ll*,000
13,000
16,000
11,000
22.000
8.600
15.000
'
OIL a
GREASE
Mg/Kg
Dry Basis
3,900
510
1,1*00
830
1,1*00
930
690
500
990
500
TOTAL
SOLIDS
%
Wet Basis
17. !*
_ZM
46.2-
65-3
1*6.2
78.6
71*. 1*
75.7
70.9
80.1*
>
VOL
SOLIDS
%
Dry Basis
20.0
3-«
7-3
l*.l*
8.1*
1.6
1.1*
l*.l*
2.0
2.7 -
SOD .
Mg/Kg
Wet Oasis
-
?
- E
?
5
, i
ro
-------
LAKE HURON BASIN 07FICE
PROPOSED DREDGING S:
SAMPLING POINTS
RAISIN RIVER
"~ """
_L SCALE 1:20,000 ^^^-^-^^^
Point TJ J.
-------
Table. 18
."1£68 Anelyticcl F.esults-
Eottom Sediment Samples.
Monroe Harbor'
IWPCA. LHBO
ro
ro
*o
SAMPLE
NO.
10-68-1
11
10-68-2
ti
it
0-68-3
ii
11
40-60-4
Ir
10-68-5
it
MO-68-6
tT
Area" Water
Depth^
Monroe Harbor 9
ii £
" 18
" " 17
21
18
» . ". 20
23
14
20
23
111
it M gO
20- -
20
f
Depth -
9
10 to 13
18
18 to 20
22 to 25
18
21 to 23
24 to 25
Ik
21 to 23
2k to 25
14
21 to 23
20
21 to 23
COLLECT
DATE
io-i-68
10-7-68
10-1-68
10-23-68
10-7-68
10-1-68
10-23-68
10-7-68
10-1-68
10-23-68
10-7-68
10-1-68
10-31-68
10-31-68
10-31-68
LAB. NO.
40561
41500
40562 -
435^2
41501
40563
43593
41502
40564
^359'J
41503
40565
44-533 '
-
44531
44532
GROSS DESCRIPTION .
Grevish "broim sludge: E
Lis;ht n;rey sludge, some gravel g. -neVbles: E i
5
Grey & Mack sludrce with some oilj..Ch- ' :
G^evish "black slurip-e: DR
Black slucl^o: Oh -
Grey « "black sludge: some oil: Ch \
Greenish "black sludge; G anl On ' 1
Black slud/rc; Ch \
\
Grey and "black slu.dc;n, some oil; Ch *
Bro'vmish black sludge; E and .Et> . |
Grev sludare:' Ch
-
Grev "brovn sludge, .qone n-n ; fTh
Grevish "broim Rlndo-p; V, . f
GrejripTn "hrrn'm p^nrlj snm^ pTnrlrTAj V. ' . ' '
Grevish "hr-cnm sand, rnrie nlnri^p- plight. 'R
' " ' '
-
.
,
....
-------
Table 18
1968 Analytical Results
Bottom. Sediment Samples
Monroe Harbor
FV7PCA, LHBO
Sampl
No>
MO-
38-1
68-1
68-2
68-2
68-2
68-3
68-3
68-3
68-4
68-4
68-4
68-5
68-5
68-6
68-6
i
|.
6IMMED.
DO DEM
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
180
< 6.0
210
78
90
240
140
60
260
180
110
190
120
18
20
COD
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
38,000
34,000
63,000
72,000
97,000
41,000
63,000
71,000
53,000
54,000
62,000
36,000
61.000
4,500
8,200
i
PHENOLS
;/g/Kg
V/ef Basis
< 190
570
46o
770
710
310
510
460
280
360
400
< 190
< 190
< 190
< 190
TOTAL
P04
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
1,300
L_i,ioo
.,600
.: ,100
.:. ,700
1,900
2,100
1,800
1,900
1,900
2,200
1,300
1,500
610
550
TOT. SOL.
P04
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
NITRATE
N03-N
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
"
NITRITE
N02~N
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
-
AMMONIA
NH3-N
Mg/Kg
Wet Basis
130
30
270
8--.
100
.TO
., p-"*
aju
310 '
450
300
250
260
«,
17
ORGANIC
NITROGEN
Mg/Kg
Wot Basis
_
- -
,.
_ .
"
_
«.
M
-
IRON
Mg/Kg
V/et Basis
10.000
7,100
9,4oo
12,600
_5--Z20
-, -, ,-.,. ,-
.I.JL -'-'L^
Q ;' '^^
O . \'^''J
1 **J ~* f*l f \
JL.-J.Oo'J
q - -oo
< 700
15,000
10.000
9.300
3.400
3.000
OIL a
GREASE
Mg/Kg
Dry Basis
2,900
4 00
8,500
£-,700
- MLP
-., , .->...:
-1 f ' .">/-,*-
i;' ,L>u-.'
* f"> J> i "\
-.5- '" '
IS, 00-'
13,00-'
2^'"'l
3,300
1.300
540
560
TOTAL
SOLIDS
%
V/af Dasis
42.7
57.6
35-8
'?.?
__i>8
-.4
33.4
^'M <
O _' » J
Tt »_7
", ~ , 6
-3,1
-3,0
:-..8
80.3
81.8
~
.
vo:,
30 LI PS
o/
/O
Dry Basi-
6.9
2.4
12.5
3.1
17.4
9-3
3.3
38.3
10. -1
o 8
*"> --,
7.7
4.8
.6
.6
BOO
f r i
is
,~
.
- -
-------
Table 19 presents the results of the analysis of water samples
from the Corps of Engineers dredge MAEKHAM, the Maumee River and in
the riverside sludge disposal area near the entrance pipe and near
the discharge weir. Analysis was done in cooperation with the Corps
of Enginecro Pilot Study at Toledo Harbor, Ohio.
231
-------
- " Table 19
1968 Analytical Results
Toledo Harbor, 11-^-68
Sludge Disposal Demonstration Project
Dredge
River
Entrance Pipe
Disch Weir
ro
L*J
ro
Dredge
River
Entrance Pipe
Disc"' Weir
Lab.
No.
4573Q
If 5781
1*5782
^5783
Lab
No.
1*5780
V5781
It5782
^783
Cond. COD Total Soluble Iron Total Susp. Diss. Tir,
umhos/cm mg/1 PO. POr r-^/1 Solids Solids Solids J.
ing/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1
> 10.000
hho
1,000
1,^00
Total
Volatile
Solids
mg/1
17,000
92
160
lltO
17,OCi "CO 3V -COO 2£0,000 S?n,000 70 > 1C
2" .1.1 .8.'. '1.3 Mo ". -:'-lo
;; i^ .:.' ^.= 620 4:. 580
:; : :ui .';- i"1^ ;S--o '?- ^ro
Volatile
Suspeaded
Solids
mg/1
15,000
6
15
18
-------
FIGURE 1 8
ST. C L A I
LAKE HURON BASIN OFFICE
LOCATION OF SAMPLING STATIONS
LAKE ST. CLAIR
233
-------
Station:
Date
6-18
8-12
9-10
10-2
10-23
TABLE 20
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Special Iron Study
Parameter: Temperature
Fe-68-1 Fe-68-2 Fe-68-3 Fe-68-U Fe-68-5
15-0
22.0
20.0
17-0
12.5
15.0
21.5
20.0
17-0
13.0
16.0
21-5
20.0
17-0
13-5
15.5
22.0
20.5
17.0
13.0
llt.O
22.0
20.0
17.0
13-0
: °C
Fe-68-6
lU.O
2? 0
£.\0
1; ,0
V 5
Fe-58-7
lit. 5
21.0
19.5
17- 0
12.5
Fe-68-8
15.0
22.0
19-5
17.0
12.5
IUPCA, LHBO
Fe-68-9
15-0
22.0
20.0
17.0
13-0
ro
Station:
Date
6-18
8-12
9-10
10-2
10-23
P8
P23
Fai raietor:
P28
15-0
22.0
20.0
17-0
12.5
-
22.0
20.0
-
13.0
15-5
21.0
20.0
17-0
12.5
14.0
22.0
20.0
17.0
12.5
-------
ro
Station:
Average
Station:
TABLE 20
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Special Iron Study
Parameter: Iron iag/1
FWPCA, LHBO
Fe-68-1 Fe-68-2 Fe-68-3 Fe-68-4 Fe-68-5 Fe-68-6 Fe-68-7 Fe-68-8 Fe-68-9
Date
6-18
8-12
9-10
10-2
10-23
.23
.27
.12
.07
.16
.111
.23
.10
.03
.18
.23
.22
.07
.05
.Ik
.60
.37
.51
.36
.28
.39
_
.14
.12
.12
.20
.19
.07
.05
.13
.17
.15
.09
.10
.25
.27
.22
.28
.22
.27
.29
.25
.28
.11
.25
.17
P8
.19 .14. .1*2 .19 .13
Parameter: Iron mg/1
P23 ' P28 EL8.
STlS
8-12
9-10
10-2
10-23
.35
.38
.18
.09
.08
.23
.57
.48
.27
57
.16
.24
.07
.18
.36
.10
_
.22
.10
.18
.15
.25
.24
Average
.22
.20
15
-------
Station:
Date
6-18
8-12
9-10
10-2
10-23
DT 30.
R98
moo
TABLE 20
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Special Iron Gti'.dy
Parameter: Ter.merature C
R102
R106
16.5
22.0
20.0
17-0
13.0
16.5
22.0
20.0
1T.O
13»5
16.5
22.0
20.0
17-0
13-0
16.5
21.0
20.0
17-0
13-0
16.0
21.0
20.0
17.0
13.5
DT 30.TE
R109 Rill
FWPCA, LHBO
R113
17-5
22.0
20,0
17-0
13-0
17.5
22.0
20.0
17-0
12. 5
17.0
21.0
20.0
17-5
12.5
to
-------
Range:
-Station:
Date
6-18
8-12
9-10
10-2
10-23
Average
DT 30.
R98
R100
.29
TABLE 20
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Special Iron Study
Parameter: Iron mg/1
R102
23
RLCA
.31
R106
.29
.35
M
.30
.30
.3*1
37
.39
.13
.23
.22
31
.26
.16
.19
.23
.35
.35
.21
«^3
.16
.18
.12
.06
.22
.15
DT 30.7E
R109 Rill
27
.29
FWPCA, LHBO
R113
60
2k
,llf
12
25
.32
.61
.19
.III
.18
.18
.2U
.25
.17
.09
.19
ro
-------
SAMPLING SITES
TRENTON CHANNEL
U.S. DEPARTMENT Q F THE INTERIOR
U'ATEfl POLLUTION CONTROL ADM IN 18 Tf! A T I ON
OREAT LAKES -flEOION OR08SE ILT, MICIIlCAt!
Monsanto
Chemical Col
W5
238
-------
FWPCA
Lake Huron Basin Office
Detroit River, Trenton Channel
1968 Oil Survey
In early 1968, the Lake Huron Basin Office conducted an oil survey
to determine the water quality of the Detroit River vith respect to
oil pollution. The information was collected as part of the Michigan
Water Resources Commission Study to datermine the cause of duck
mortailities in the Southeastern Michigan "basin:
Both surface and middepth (10 feet) samples were collected at
Station R93 at the Grosse He County "bridge (Range DT 8.7W), ^80'
from the western shore. Field observations were also recorded. The
sample collections were made on 62 days in January, February and
March. The average oil concentrations for the surface and depth
samples were 2.7 and 2.2 mg/1, respectively.
The oil concentration for each sampling day is listed in the
following tattle along with a summary of the field observations.
The oil observed at each of six stations (R91 through R96)
across the Trenton Channel is given according to the following key:
0 = No oil observed
X = Oil spots or light traces of oil fc
XX = Light to moderate film of oil
XXX = Thick cover of oil
A more detailed description of the condition of the river on each
day is given on the pages following the table.
239
-------
ro
o
Date
1-2
1-3
1-5
1-8
l-9
l-io
1-11
1-12
1-16
1-17
1-18
Station: R93
Oil & Grease
(mg/l)
1-22**
1-23**
2
2
3
2
2
P
2
3
2
2
3
FWPCA
Detroit Program Office
1968 Oil Survey
Detroit River Range DT 8.7W
Table 21
Observations
RQ1
8c
X
X
0
X
0
0
0
X
0
X
X
X
X
0
X
0
R92
280*
X
X
X
X
0
0
0
0
X
0
X
X
X
X
0
X
0
R93
1*80*
X
X
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
X
X
X
X
0
X
X
680;:-
7
T
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
X
0
X
X
0
0
f-\
R95
980*
X
-r
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
X
X
0
0
0
R96
*
-r
k
,\
.',
X
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
X
X
0
0
0
lie Cover
(*)
no '
so
-' :-
10
95
15
1
15 '
90
10
30
10
0
0
0
0
no
. Remarks
Ice alc!?g stcr-: nnd in fleet
Ice along nhoro & in floes,
rxm-i d'Til "1'r.dvas, 100 live
Ico aj. ng ,:hore, 100 live du;
Ice a!-'sTf; ::h^r? . h live due'
Extensive iloa ice
Ice on ea.~b -"-ore, some flor
100 live due: .~
150 liv'i cl^'; '.-, on rive:; ; ..;
of oil on ice 'lie.-;
Ice along shorelines
Ice along shoiol'.".n-2s, extensive
thin ice cover
Ice along S.chore;water rough
Ice alorg 3. shore,50..live due"/
Ice along 3hore
Very light traces of oil
50 live ducks
50 live ducks
Ice floes along east side
;::'Feet from vest shore
'Probable Runoff during previous 2n-hours
-------
Station: R93
Oil & Grease
(mg/1)
FWPCA
Detroit Program Office
1968 Oil Survey
Detroit River Range DT 8.7W
Table 2L
Observations
. Date
1-25
1-26
1-29**
1-30**
to ^"^
g 2-1**
2-2**
2-5**
2-6**
2-7--
2-8
2-9
~2-12
2-13
2-lh
2-15
2-16
2-19
2-20
2-21
2-23
10 ft.
Surface Depth
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
- . 2
3
2
3 -
R91
80*
0
X
X
X
. :x
. x
0
0
0
X
xx
XX
x.
X
XX
0
0
0
XXX
0
X
R92
280*
0
X
X
X
o.
X
0
' 0
X
X
XX
XX
x
X
XX
X
X
X
XX
0
X -
R93
1*80*
0
X
X
X
X
.X
0
0
0
X
XX
XX
0
X
XX
0
0
X
X
0
0
R9^
680*
0
0
X
X
0
X
0
0
0
0
XX
XX
0
0
XX
0
0
0
X
0
0
R95
980*
0
0
X
0
0
X
0
0
0
0
XX
XX
X
0 x
XX
0
0
0
XX
0
0
R96
12^0*
0
0
X
0
0
X .
0
0
0
0
XX
XX
0
0
XX
0
0
0
XXX
0
0
Ice Cover
(£)
50 '
20
3
0
0
0
0
X)
0
0
< 1
< 1
80
30 . '
20
:o
0
50
15
< i
20
Remarks
Extensive ice floes;shoreline
ice
Ice along shores; few ice flees
some scum with the oil
Traces of oil on ice. floes
Some oil trapped along V. shore
Heavy rain previous 2U hours
Some foam on river
Occasional ice floe
Occasional ice floe
Ice along shore & in floes
Thin floe ice
Ice along East shore;oil on floes
Hoe ice
Ice on East side
Floe ice
Ice along Eastern shore
*Eeet from west-shore . . ,
**ProoaDle runoff during previous 24-hours
-------
Station: R93
Oil & Grease
FWPCA
Detroit Program Office
1968 Oil Survey
Detroit River Range DT S.fW
Table 2L
Observations
Date
2-2o~~
2-27
2-28**
2-29
3-1
3-*
w 3-5**
£3-6
3-7
3-8
3-11
3-12
3-13**
3-llj**
3-15**
3-18**
3-19
3-20**
3-21**
3-22*-*
3-25**
3-26**
3-27**
3-23
3~£9
Surface
-
h
5
3
3
1-
2
3
2
3
3.
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
h
'"i
/"
10 ft.
De-oth
3
3
2
3
3
1
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
-
3
2
2
2
*";
R91
80*
X
XX
X
XX
XXX
0
XXX
XXX
X
XX
0
0
.0
0
0
XX
XXX
XX
0
XX
0
X
XXX
0
XX
R92
280*
X
XX
X
XX
XX
0
X
XXX
0
XX
0
0
0
0
0
XX
XX
XX
0
XX
0
0
XXX
0
1 r-if
R93
1*80*
X
XX
X
XX
XX
0
X
JCQC
0
XX
0
X
0
0
0
XX
XX
XX
0
XX
0
0
XX
0
ICC
R9^
680*
X
XX
X
XX
X
0
0
XXX
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
XX
XX
XX
0
XX
0
0
ICC
0
XX
R95
980*
X
XX
XX
XX
X
0
0
XXX
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
XX
XX
XX
0
XX
0
0
XX
0
XX
R95
121*0*
X
XX
D
XX
X
0
0
XXX
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
XX
XX
XX
0
XX
0
0
XX
0
XX
Ice Cover
'*)
bo
0
0
0
0
-J
u
0
0
20
0
10
0
0
5
0
30
15
IfO
0
0
0
0
c
';
Remarks
Floe ice
i not disccr
ice on
Ice along chore
Scattered floe ice
Some heavy spots of oil
Ice jam on vest side
Seme floes; cc^i3 oil on ice
Floe ice
Scvn along vest shore
--Feet from vest chore
**Probable runoff during previous
-------
1968 Oil Survey
Date Observations FWPCA, DPO
1-2 Small spots of light rainbow colored oil all over the
open water. Shoreline and floe ice covering kO$> of water
area.
1-3 Traces of brown oil all over the open water. Some oil on
the ice floes.
1-lf Small spots of light blue oil along western portion of the
river.
1-5 Trace of light oil at R92. .
1-8 Trace of light oil at R91 and R96. At least 95$ of the
river was covered with ice floes.
1-9 No oil observed. Ice along east shore. Some floe ice.
1-10 Occasional ice floe; light blue oil on one floe.
1-11 No oil observed; ice along shore.
1-12 Small spots of oil observed on western portion of the river.
A thin film of ice over 90$ of the water.
1-15 No oil was visible. Rough water and wave action limited
visibility.
1-16 Trace of light blue oil over western portion of the river.
Eastern portion (30$) covered with ice.
1-17 Few light spots of silver and rainbow colored on western
portion of the river at stations R91, R92, and R93.
1-18 Traces of rainbow colored oil over the entire river.
1-19 Thin film of silver to brown oil all over the river.
21*3
-------
1968 Oil 5urvu.-
Date Observations FWPCA, DPO
1-22 No oil or ice observed.
1-23 Some email cpotc o:1" rd3\ -. and rainbow oil on western
portion of thr> rivc-i',
l-2lj Few small spots ner.r R93* Hoe ice covering most of the
eastern portion of the river.
1-25 No oil observed. Extensive floe ice.
1-26 Western portion revered vith a very light silver and.
rainbov; col...;c. ',.:. 'U' oil. Some brown scum mixed in
with the oil. L few ice floes observed.
1-29 Traces cf thi" -IT-.-sr to brown colored oil all over the
river. A for ice floes were observed.
1-30 Thin light blue film of oil on western portion of the river.
1-31 Gome spots of silver colored oil at R91 and R93.
2-1 Traces of light blue oil (thin) all over the river and
trapped along chore.
2-2 No oil or ice observed.
2-5 No oil or ice observed.
2-6 Few spots of silver colored oil at R93
2-7 Traces of oil observed on western portion of the river.
2-8 Small spots of oil all over the river. Occasional ice floes
observed. Also few traces of sewage & debris.
2-9 Thin film of brown oil all over the river.
2-12 Traces of silver-gray oil at R91, R92 and R95- Thin 'J'^a
floes covering 80$ of the water surface. Some oil observed
on the floes.
-------
1968 Oil Survey
Date Observations FWPCA, DPO
2-13 Few spots of oil on western potion of river. Western
portion of river. Western portion covered with extensive
floe ice.
2-lh Thin light "blue oil film al 1 over the open water and along
the edges of the ice floes. Most of 20$ ice cover along
east side of channel.
2-15 Few spots of rainbow colored oil at R92
2-l6 Few spots of silver-colored oil at R92.
2-19 Few silver colored oil spots near R92 and B93- Eastern
portion of river covered with floe ice.
2-20 The center of the channel is covered with a thin film of
light blue oil. Both the east and west sides are covered
with thick patches of light blue oil every few feet.
2-21 No oil observed. Occasional ice floe.
2-23 Few small spots of silver colored oil at R91 & R92
Shoreline ice along east bank.
2-26 Small spots of rainbow and silver colored oil (thin) all
around the extensive ice floes.
2-27 Light-colored film of oil all over the river.
2-28 A thin film of light blue oil over all the river except
along the eastern shoreline.
2-29 A light silver and rainbow colored oil film covered the; entire
width .of 'the. river. .. Traces of-similar oil- vere -observed at
0. C. Howey Marina, Pine Street (Wyandotte), Wyandotte
Yacht Club and at Southfield Road. In addition, a large
-------
1968 Oil Survey
Date Observations FWPCA, DPO
2-29 quantity of light silver and .rcinbov colored oil was
flowing froa Ilorxgusgo^ Ci. .-I:. Small spots of light oil
were also observed on the Rouge River at the DT & I
railroad bridge, the Fort Street bridge and in the Old
Channel. Heavy black oil and debris were trapped at the
Dix Avenue and Jefferson bridges.
3-1 West side of ths -i-cr was covered with a thin to mediin-
heavy filr: o.,. _.,.j. . ;nd brown colored oil. The east side
was covered with spots of silver-blue oil (thin)
3-1* No oil or ICG "::; -.--cd.
3-5 A light blue oil film on the western portion of the river
with a thick film, of dark brown oil and scum trapped along
the western chore.
3-6 At 8:05 AM, c, heavy film of black and red-colored oil
extended all across the river. Only light traces of rainbow
colored oil were observed 50 minutes later".'. Heavy black oil
was observed on the Rouge River trapped at Dix Avenue and
Jefferson Street bridge abutments. Traces of light
rainbow colored oil were observed at several points along
the Detroit River, including 0. C. Howey Marina, Grosse
lie toll bridge, at the foot of Wye St., and So\r'' fid Road.
3-7 Few spots of light blue oil.
3-8 Both thin ice floes and a thin film of silver colored cil
floating downstream in the western portion of the river.
Eastern hall of river free of oil and ice.
21*6
-------
1968 Oil Survey
Date Observations FWPCA, DPO
3-11 No oil or ice observed.
3-12 Few tracec of light "blue oil at R93- Ice along western
shoreline.
3-13 No oil or ice observed.
3-lU No oil or ice observed
3-15 No oil observed. There were a few ice floes.
3-18 Thin film of silver-colored oil covering the entire
. . width of the river.
3-19 A light film of silver-blue oil covering the entire width
of the river with a heavy film at the western shore near
R91. Ice Jammed along the western shoreline north of the
bridge.
3-20 Thin to moderate film of light blue oil over the entire
width of the river. Some ice floes floating downstream.
3-21 No oil observed. Ice floes covered kofi of the water surface.
3-22 Thin silver-gray colored oil film covering the entire width
of the river.
3-25 No oil or ice observed.
3-26 Light film of blue-gray oil at R91.
3-27 Heavy film (350! wide) along the^western shoreline. The .rest
of. the river was covered.: With-a: thin film of light blue oil.
3-28 No oil or ice observed.
3»29 A thin film of silver-blue colored oil covering the entire
width of the river.
-------
TABLE 22
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River 5-3-68
Special Sampling Run Hear Elizabeth Park Canal
Monsanto Discharge of White Floating Waste
FUPCA, LHBO
Location
In Discharge
In Discharge
Upstream
Downstream
Lai).
ITo.
18700
18701
1870^
18705
Temp
19.5
20.5
10.0
16.0
BOD
mg/1
6
5
5
3
COD
mg/1
12
7
5
£5
Total
Sol.
mg/1
2ho
?.6o
2*0
.03
Diss.
Sol.
mg/1
;:'40
20
':0
Susp.
sol.
mg/1
15
17
11
19
Total
mg/1
71
71
^
.93
Total
Sol. PO,
ng/1
M
.W
.38
.65
CO
-------
Table 23
Special Bacteriological Studies
Detroit River Area
1968 Sample Analysis Results
'Detroit River - R155
Date
Temp ( C)
4-4
5-1
5-20
5-27
5-28
6-5
6-11
10-21
11-5
Median
Rouge River
7-18
8-6
8-28
9-23
Median
Ecorse River
4-22
5-27
5-28
6-5
Wayne County
4-23
5-27
5-28
1.0
10.5
13-5
l4.o
13.0
17.0
20.5
15-5
10.5
- ra.4o
24.0
26.0
24.0
23.5
- Biddle St.
12.0
13.0
12.0
20.0
W1410
18.5
15.0
18.0
Monguagon Creek
4-23
5-27
5-28
21.5
16.0
16.0
Total Coliform
55,000
800
1,400
100,000
51,000
140,000
600
5,000
3,300
5,000
FHPCA, LHBO
Fecal Coliform
4,100,000
7,800,000
17,000,000
5,900,000
6,900,000
8,000
7,240,000
400,000
80,000
< 10
> 230,000
310,000
24o
> 110,000
79,000
570
310
21,000
< 10
249
-------
Date
5/21* - 5/27
6/7 - 6/10
7/5 - 7/8
TABLE 2U
Detroit River
Trenton Channel
Salmonella Serotypec
Sampling Station
Toll Bridge
*TC/100 xnl > 250, 000
PC/100 nl 27,000
FS/100 ml 8,800
Free E
TC/100 nl > 230, 000
PC/100 nl 21,000
PS/100 ml 5,800
Toll Bridge
TC/100 ill
PC/100 nl
FS/100 ml
Free Bridge
13/100 ml
PC/100 ml
PS/100 ml
Toll Bridge
670
20
10
1,500
30
10
TC/100 ml 56,000
PC/100 ml 1,1»00
PS/100 ml 58
Salmonella
Serotypes Isolated
S. heidelberg; S.
S. oranieriburg;
S. tennesnee; S. thompcon
S. Javiana; S. minnesota;
S. OB?_O; S. tennessee
S. oranienburg
S. infantic; S. manhattan;
S. oranlenbvirg;
S. cenftenburg
S. tennecccc; C, " ridelberg
250
-------
Date
7/5 - 7/8
7/19 - 7/22
8/2-8/5
TABLE 2k (Cont'd)
Detroit River
Trenton Channel
Salmonella Serotypes
Sampling Station
Free Bridge
TC/100 ml 66,000
FC/100 ml 1,500.
PS/100 ml 68
Toll Bridge^
TC/100 ml 90,000
FC/100 ml T80
F3/100 ml < 5
Free Bridge
TC/100 ml 130,000
FC/100 ml 1,200
FS/100 ml 20
Toll Bridge
TC/100 ml 200,000
FC/100 ml 1,300
FS/100 ml 6
Salmonella
Serotypes Isolated
S. tennessee; S. son diego
S. infantisj S. thompsonj
S. typhinrurium var. Copenhagen
S. anatum; S. derby;
S. heidelberg; S. infantis;
S. manhattan; S. montevideo;
S. oranlenburg; S. pomona
S. st. paul (05-);
S. senitenberg; S. thompson
Hone Isolated
251
-------
Date
8/2 - 8/5
TABLE 2H (Cont'd)
Detroit River
Trenton Channel
Salmonella Scrotypec
Sampling Gtotic-i
Free Bridge
TC/100 nl 250,000
FC/100 nl 3,100
PCT /n oo -1 1 k
Salmonella
Serotsrpes Isolated
S. derby; S. heidelbei-g (05-)
S. infantis; S. neTrportj
S. reading (05-); S. st. paul;
S* thompcon; S. typhimirium
* TC = Total Coliforas
FC » Fecal Coliforac
FS a Fecal Streptococci
Count B made on water oompleG taken at time of Moore c;,-ob recovery.
252
-------
FWPCA, LHBO
Week No<
Date
1 l/l - 1/6
2 1/7 - 1/13
- 1/20
4 1/21 - 1/27
5 1/28 - 2/3
6 2/4 - 2/10
7 2/11 - 2/17
8 2/18 - 2/24
9 2/25 - 3/2
10 3/3 - 3/9
11 3/10 - 3/16
TABLE 25
Detroit River
at Glbralter, Michigan
Automatic Monitor Results
1968
Terap
Dissolved Oxygen
Conductivity
(ttmhos/cm)
Avg.
Max.
Min.
Avg.
Max.
Min.
Avg.
Max.
Min.
Avg.
Max.
Min.
Avg.
Msec.
Min.
Avg.
Max.
Min.
Avg.
Max.
Min.
Avg.
Max.
Min.
Avg.
Max.
Min.
Avg.
Max.
Min.
Avg.
Max.
Min.
36
37
33
35
36
34
38
41
34
38
40
35
39
}£.
37
39
42
37
37
38
36;
38
40
37
40
43
37
39
43
36
39
42
34
11.8
13-0
10.3
12.6
12.6
12.4
12.6
13.2
12.2
12.8
13.4
12.4
12.7
13.2
11.8
12.1
13.0
11.5
12.5
12.6
12.2
13.2
13.6
12.8
-
-
11.9
12.4
11.6
12.0
12.4
11.5
400
430
360
380
390
360
400
480
350
390
430
350
410
440
350
400
430
360
380
390
350
385
420
360
390
420
360
375
410
350
390
470
360
253
-------
FVZPCA, LHBO
TABLE 25 (Cont'd)
DetroitRiver
at Gibraltar, Michigan
Automatic Monitor Results
1958
Week No. Date '
12
13
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
3/17
3/24
9/22
9/29
10/6
10/13
10/20
10/27
11/3
11/10
- 3/23
- 3/30
-9/28
- 10/5
- 10/12
- 10/19
- 10/26
- 11/2
-n/9
- 11/16
Avg.
Max.
Min.
Avg.
Ma::.
Avg.
Max.
Min.
Avg.
Ma::.
Min.
Avg.
Ms::.
Min.
Avg.
Max.
Min.
Avg.
r?::.
Hin.
Avg.
Max.
Min.
Avg.
Max.
Min.
Avg.
Max.
Min.
(°I_l
39
44
37
43
i>6
70
72
67
69
71
65
64
67
63
67
70
64
64
69
60
57
60
55
57
59
55
53
56
51
Dissolved Oxygen Conductivity
(umhog/cm)
390
440
350
440
485
415
300
335
270
305
34o
275
320
345
295
320
360
290
325
360
310
325
375
285
5OO
315
330
290
11.6
12.4
10.8
11.0
11.7
10.1
7.4
7.7
7.1
7.4
7.7
6.9
7.9
8.5
7.3
7.3
8.1
6.3
7.2
7.9
5.8
8.3
10.1..
7.7
8.6
9.7
7.8
9.1
9.6
8.5
254
-------
TABLE 25(Cont'd)
Detroit River
at Gibraltar, Michigan
FWPCA, LHBO Automatic Monitor Results
1968
Temp Dissolved Oxygen Conductivity
Week No. Date (°F) (mg/l) (umhos/cm)
M 11/17 - H/23 Avg. 53 9.8 335
Max. 56 10.6 370
Min. 51 9.1 310
1*8 11/24 - 11/30 Avg. 53 10.0 330
Max. 56 10.3 370
Min. 1^8 8.3 310
1*9 12/1 - 12/7 Avg. 1*8 10.1 350
Max. 51 10.5 380
Min. 1*6 9.0 325
50 12/8 - 12/14 Avg. 1*4 11.8 315
Max. 1*7 13.9 3^0
Min. 1*1 10.1 290
51 12/15 - 12/21 Avg. 42 13.1 315
Ma::. 44 13-9 370
Min. 37 11.0 290
52 12/22 - 12/28 Avg. 40 12.2 340
Max. 41 IT.4 400
Min. 38 10.1 295
255
-------
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Alternate Monitor Intake Study
In considering an alternate position for the monitor intake, a
new station (MON-2) was carrpled clone with the monitor intake station.
The temperature, DO, and concmctivity were measured at "both stations
for comparison.
FWPCA, LHBO
Date
6-10
6-10
6-11
6-11
6-12
6-12
7-29
7-29
7-29
7-29
Mon In'.,
DO
mg/1
9.0
8.4
8.7
8.6
7.7
7.0
6.9
7.2
7.4
Iv- <-_.
DO
I-Ion Int
Cond.
MON-2
Cond.
ms/1 umhos/cm umhos/cm
8.1
9.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
6.4
6.8
5.8
7.3
7.2
340
360
420
360
340
330
-
-
- .
-
350
340
410
380
340
340
_
'
-
-
Mon Int
Op
Temp
20.0
21.5
22.0
23.0
21.0
21.5
20.0
20.0
21.0
21.0
MON-2
°F
Temn
20.5
22.5
22.0
23-5
21.5
22.5
20.5
£0.5
21.0
21.0
256
-------
TABLE 26
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River: WPSS # 143 - Gibralter
FWPCA, LHBO
Date
2-7
2-14
2-20
**. ff^f^
2-28
._ /
3-6
3-13
3-20
3-28
4-3
4-10
5-1
5-9
5-15
5-22
5-29
6-5
6-19
6-27
7-3
7-10
7-17
7-24
8-7
8-14
8-21
8-28
9-4
Temp.
(°c)
4.0
2.0
2.5
5.0
4.5
3-5
3.5
8.0
10.0
10.5
13.5
13.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
17.0-
18.0
20.0
20.0
14.0
23-5
24.5
23.5
25-5
22.0
21.0
PH
(s.u.)
8.2
7.9
8.2
8.3
7.6
7.6
7.9
7.3
7.8
8.0
8.0
7.9
7.9
9.0
7.7
7.6
7.9
7.8
8.0
8.1
7.8
8.0
7.7
8.0
7-7
8.1
AUc.
mg/1 as
CaCOq
77
75
79
77
75
83
82
91
95
91
82
88
90 .
79
98
89
84
88
72
83
88
82
86
86
84
86
Cl.
mg/1
51
49
47
49
^5
55
41
51
58
51
53
48
51
51
52
43
38
5^
40
_
38
34
58
41
26
36
29
DO
mg/1
I. j i
10.5
11.6
12.3
12.5
11.8
10.9
11.1
10.1
10.2
10.5
10.1
9.5
9.1
7.4
9.2
8.3
5.4
8.1
7.2
5.8
6.7
6.7
6.5
6.7
7.7
BOD
mg/1
'
5
5
5
4
5
5
5
9
7
5
6
6
6
6
6
4
2
4
5
3
3
5
COD
mg/1
^iJ-Tl
26
16
16
11
13
19
18
^3
26
26
26
50
28
20
33
4
20
14
15
Turb.
JCU
35
25
30
25
30
25
35
25
40
25
50
*20
15
60
20
15
80
25
20
25
15
20
15
15
Total
Hard.
as
CaCO,.
130
120
120
120
120
120
120
140
l4o
120
160
140
130
»^"*F
130
160
140
130
170
130
*.^**
160
150
130
100
100
Total
Coli.
MF/100 ml
780
1,000
1,080
40
4,900
420
4,600
5,200
16,000
15,000
^^ J V V «
2,400
1,680
6,000
128,000
920
4,800
320,000
980
200,000
56,000
1,100
170,000
51,000
-------
TABLE 26
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Detroit River: WPSS # 3.1*3 - Gibralter
EWPCA. LHBO
Temp.
Date
9-11
9-18
9-25
10-2
10-9
10-16
10-23
10-30
11-6
11-13
11-20
12-4
12-18
Average
Maximum
Minimum
(°
9.
12.
21.
19.
15.
17.
15.
10.
12.
8.
8.
8.
2.
_
25.
2.
c)
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
5
5.
0
oH
(s.u.)
7.8
8.6
8.0
7.7
8.0
7.4
7.6
7.6
7-5
7.8
7.9
8.1
8.1
7-9
9.0
7-3
Alk.
ng/1 as
CaCO^
86
**kh
76
80
88
80
72
77
83
88
86
93
79
84
98
44
Cl.
mg/1
34
31.
53
3;!
3V
_
44
41
**94
39
37
33
44
94
26
DO
ng/1
6.1
8.1
6.8
7.3
7.8
7.8
7.7
8.6
8.1*
9.3
9.8
10.9
12.3
8.9
12.5
5.4
BOD
mg/1
3
3
3
3
4
5
3
7
9
11
8
6
5
k
11
2
COD
mg/1
14
23
13
-
19
59
29
12
16
39
21
25
31
22
50
4
Turb.
JCU
15
15
20
-
15
15
20
20
65
25
15
30
25
80
15
Total
Hard.
as
CaCO,
100
110
120
110
120
110
-
110
130
VLALO Ji rt
K't-if* I 11)
110
100
110
130
240
100
Total
Coli.
MF/100 p.]
450,000
-
480,000
220,000
-
75,000
6,000
900
1,000
800
27, 000
700
1,200
Median
4,900
480,000
4o
* Ne*r TMrbidimeter placed into use (with greater sensitivity)
* Kc' -?.:.-.-ded in average
-------
ro
v/i
vo
fD
ca
ra
o
0
o
ct
H-
O
&
fD
S-
O
S
ca
CD
co
ct
IT
o
o
I
o
ro
o
HI
ro
CD
cl
4
to
ra
ct
o
ro
o
HI
&
CO
if
I
CO
S-
ct
8T
3
ra
ct
O
H-
&
ct
0*
CD
o a?
o p:
0 oq
P> CD
o W
ct H.
5
§
P
ra
I
ra
5-
o
ro
p
ra
ro
PI
0
ro
P
CD
?
ro
I
co
&
ct
&
a
o
3
CD
t>
H«
ra
ra
I
P»
OT
ro
B
o
§
o
I
H-
O
B
ra
P
I-1
ra
O
H«
ro
P-
p
I
a
B4
Det
S
H
PI
H-
ra
o
B
ro
td
H-
ro
&
H-
0
ct
CD
ct
O
ct
p:
S
ra
o
o
o
Pi
B1
§
ct
B1
CD
I
S
O
P
ra
ra
CD
Pi
CD
PI
P
ra
ct
c?
o*
O
p
ra
ra
fD
PI
ct
0*
3
c
H-
O
ra
O
Hi
H
ft
m
o
S
i
ra
§ I
3 I
CD
CD
ra
b*
ct
0"
ro
ct
ra
4
o
Hi
ro
S
3
S
ro
S
ro
I
I
s
o
3-
3
S
ro
o
H>
HJ
£?
OQ
p
S1
B
cw
ct
ro
o
o
ra
ro
ra
ct
ro
PI
ro
ro
o
ro
o-
o
o
03
CD
03
ct
o
fi 3
PJ
O
Ct
B
a
ct
B-
ro
ct
CD
ro
|
ro
o
S
Pi
o
ct
§
PI
ct
O
P.
O
0
cn
ct
if
1
§
o
ff
§
o
HI
£
CD
ct
3
S
fl
§
H*
ct
O
ra
I
&
O
ct
ro
|
H-
ct
O
ra
g
ct
ro
PI
o
p
PI
P
ro
o
0*
o
S-
1
-------
20
-------
Table 27
MOBILE MARINE MONITOR RESULTS
DETROIT RIVER RUN
. 7/31/68 and 8/1/68
Footage*
Land Marks
Temp
Conductivity
(umhos/cm) DO (mg/l)
7/31/68
41236 Chrysler Corp., Chemical Div.
41628
42130
42630
43130
44740
45940
46136 Center of Free Bridge
46500
46840
47240
48540
49040
49500
50140
50340 Bouy #9
51120
513--3
51480
51720
51930
52410
52700 Bouy #13
261
78.0
77.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
75:0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
350
340
340
340
340
350
340
340
340
340
340
350
350
360
360
360
360
370
370
350
310
260
260
6.4
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.5
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.3
' 6.3
6.7
6.8
6.8
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.9
7.1
7.2
7.2
-------
Table 27
MOBILE MARINE MONITOR RESULTS (Cont'd)
DETROIT RIVER RUN
7/31/68 and 8/1/68
Footage*
53720
54050
54620
56510
56720
56840
56930
56960
57290
57500
57860
58040
58500
59950
60250
60550
63390
635-0
63800
64200
64320
64500
64500
/'/.~no
Conductivity
Land Markc Temp (^°)
7/31/68 (Cont'd)
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
McLouth Steel, Trenton 74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
73.5
73.0
73.0
Toll Bridge . 73.0
73.0
73-0
73-0
73-0
73.0
(umhOE/cmJ
255
260
270
350
340
390
450
380
380
390
4oo
410
410
410
420
390
280
340
380
350
350
430
DO (ir
7.3
7-2
7.2
6.9
7.0
7.0
7.0
6.8
6.9
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
7.0
7.1
7.1
7-0
7.0
7.0
7.0
Firestone Outfall - Delay
73.0
,nr>
-------
Table 27
MOBILE MARINE MONITOR RESULTS (Cont'd)
DETROIT RIVER RUNS
7/31/68 and 8/1/68
Conductivity
Ifootage*
65300
65500
65750
67950
68100
68350
68870
68900
69000
69^50
69500
69600
69800
69950
70000
70240
72240
72500
73^0
75950
76140
Land Marks
W-14
W-15
W-22
W-25
Bouy # 29
Bolj-Lo Dock
Temp (l°)
7/31/68 (Cont'd)
73.0
73.0
73.0
73.0
73.0
73-0
73.0
73.0
73.0
73.0
73.0
73-0
73.0
73.0
73.0
73.0
73.0
73.0
73.0
73.0
73.0
70.0
70.0
(umhos/cm)
-
440
44o
430
46o
450
450
440
440
380
380
390
340
320
310
310
320
310
300
290
260
270
350
300
DO (i
7.0
6.9
6.9
6.8
6.8
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.9
7.2
6.9
7.1
7.0
263
-------
Table 27
MOBILE MARINE MONITOR RESULTS (Cont'd)
DETROIT RIVER RUN
7/31/68 and 8/1/68
Conductivity
Footage* Land_Marks Temp _(E°) (umhos/cm) DO (mg/l)
761^0
7621*0
76550
79050
79100
791^0
79300
79^0
796^0
79800
80010
80600
80600
81600
82500
83100
836co
8^100
85000
85700
86l»oo
88900
7/31/68 JCont'd)
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
W-27 72.0
ttyandotte Chemical Corporation 72.0
78.0
76.0
76.0
7^.0
8/1/68
Vtyandotte Chemical Corporation (N) 71.0
71.0
W-30 71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
: 71.0
71.0
Ecorse Creek 71«0
*ci, 71.0
3^40
380
380
teo
boo
kjo
500
800
250
260
260
2^0
235
230
235
2kO
230
2^0
2^0
245
2^5
2^0
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
6.9
6.9
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.7
6.7
7.1
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.9
6.8
6.8
6.6
6.5
6.8
-------
Table 27
MOBILE MARINE MONITOR RESULTS (Cont'd)
DETROIT RIVER RUN
7/31/68 and 8/1/68
Footage*
Land Marks
Temp
Conductivity
(umhos/cm)
DO (mg/1)
8/1/68 (Cont'd)
89800 Mud Island
90500
91200 RN-4
92300
92800
94100
95000 DT 17. 4W
95800
96000
96500 Great Lakes Steel
97000 W-33
97600 W-34
98200 W-35
98800 ₯-36
99000
99200 w-38
99400 w-39
998;.;- Nicholson Terminal Docks
100300
101100
102000
Great Lakes Steel
103800
.y
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
72.0
72.5
72.0
72.0
72.0
72.0
72.0
72.0
72.5
72.5
74.5
74.5
76.0
76.0
240
240
240
240
2nO
2*fO
240
piiQ
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
250
255
255
275
275
6.5
7.0
6.9
6.8
7.0
6.3
6.7
6.0
5.2
6.3
6.8
7.1
6.9
6.9
6.5
6.5
6.8
6.4
6.6
6.7
6.7
6.5
6.5
265
-------
Footage*
Table 27
MOBILE MAROTE MONITOR RESULTS (Cont'd)
DETROIT RIVER RUN
7/31/68 and 8/1/68
Land Marks
Conductivity
Temp (J0) (umhos/cm) D0(mg/l)
io4ioo
101*600
105100
106100
106700
106800
106900
107200
107500
107700
w-43
Detroit Edison Outlet
Rouge River, Mou'wli (..%>
Rouge River, Mouth (ll)
Bouy # R-2
Detroit Sewage Treatment
8/1/68 (Cont'd)
76.0
76.0
77-5
81.0'
77.0
76.0
76.0
76.0
76.0
Plant 76.0
275
295
310
310
350
230
240
230
240
230
6.5
5-9
5-3
5.0
5.0
7.5
7.5
7.4
7.4
' 7.4
Outfall
Sbotage - Distance from Detroit River Light
266
-------
FIGURE 2 ]
MOUNT
CLEMENS
ST. CLAIR
SCALE IN MILES
LAKE ERIE
LAKE HURON BASIN OFFICE
HIGH WATER STUDY
SAMPLING STATIONS
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
OREAT LAKES REGION QROSSE ILE, MICHIGAN
267
-------
TABLE 28
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Water Quality During High Water Stage
Raisin, Huron,' Rouge, and Clinton Rivers
FWPCA. LHBO
Huron Raisin Rouge Clinton
Date T055 T056 T089 T09Q T020 T02U Cl80 Cl6p Cl^O
Temp (°C)
7-1 22.0 22.0 22.0 21.0 21.5 21.5 23.0 22-5 22.5
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
7-1 koo kOQ kko hho 780 ' "'o 610 620 620
oo pH (Standard Units)
7-1 7.8 8.1 8.0 8.1 7-8 7-8 8.2 7.8 8.0
BOD (mg/l)
7-1 7.641*76578
COD (mg/l)
7-1 30 33 67 37 ^3 38 8^ - ho
Total P0)t (mg/l)
7-1 ,li8 .52 ,l»6 .50 .65 .63 1.5 1.2 1.3
Tote, 1. Sol. 70j; (n^/l)
7-1 Jf3 .^0 .33. .38 .52 .28 l.U 1.0 .9
-------
TABLE 28
. ' 1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Water Quality During High Water Stage
Raisin, Huron, Rouge and Clinton Rivers
FWPCA, LHBO
Huron Raisin . Rouge Clinton
*
Date T055 T056 T089 T090 T020 T024 Cl80 Cl60 CT50
Hitrates (mg/l)
T-l 1.6 1.4 4.3 4.3 2.7 2.8 2.4 2.8 2.7
Ammonia-H (mg/l)
7-1 .37. .42 .14 .11 .37 .49 .85 .64 .59
^0 Total Coliform (MF/100 ml)
7-1 7,6oo 5,100 13,000 17,000 180,000 180,000 >23,coo 22,000 15,000
Fecal Coliform (MF/100 ml)
7-1 . 300 200 400 800 8,200 7,900 17,000 1,200 1,100
Organic-N (mg/l)
7-1 .14 .13 .23 <.05 .05 .11 ^.05 .12 .58
Total Solids (mg/l)
7-1 320 300 400 380 560 580 470 480 480
Dissolved Solids (mg/l)
7-1 250 250 360 320 500 500 450 410 410
-------
Huron
Date T055
Suspended Solids (mg/l)
7-1 66
Turbidity (j.C.U.)
7-1 50
Sulfate (mg/l)
7-1 7^
TABLE 28
1968 SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Water Quality During High Water Stage
Raisin, Huron, Rouge and Clinton Rivers
50
ho
67
Raisin
50
90
60
80
FWPCA, LHBO
Rouge
Clinton
T089 TQ90 T020 T024 Cl80 Cl60 C150
$h
35
91
30
,>5
2^ 7^
20
62
35
30
62
-------
LASOKATOKT 2-EZEODS
The analytical methods used by the laboratory for physical and
chemical analyses vere the procedures published in "Standard Methods
for the Examination of Water and Wastewater," 12th Edition, 1965.
Additional analytical procedures and modifications developed "by the
Chicago Program Office, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
vere employed as required in the analysis of bottom sediment material.
Modifications have been made on some of the methods to improve the
sensitivity or to expedite a systematic analytical scheme. Before
adopting any modification a thorough study was made to evaluate the
affect of the change.
To assure continually reliable data, reference standards of known
composition and blanks vere analyzed simultaneously vith all tests.
A summation of the analyses perfoimed is shown on Table 29 .
Specific techniques or modifications to "Standard Methods*1 procedure
are shown where applicable.
271
-------
Table 29
Lake Huron Basin Office
Summary of Laboratory Procedure
Analysis
pH
Conductivity
Alkalinity
Chloride
Phenol
Dissolved Oxygen
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Total Phosphate
Total Soluble Phosphata
Nitrate
Nitrite
Ammonia
Organic Nitrogen
Total Coliform
Fecal Coliform
Fecal Strep
Total Solids
Suspended Solids
Total Volatile Solidc
Volatile Suspended Solidc
Iron
Sulfate
Oil & Grease
Technique or Modification
Glasn Electrode Method
Specific Conductance Cell
Potentiometric pH l)-.5 & pH 8.3
Mercuric Nitrate
Aminoantipyrine
Method A - Alcterberg '(Azide)
Modification of Winkler Method
No modifications
Silver Sulfate Catalyst
Autoclaved with Sulfuric acid on
^nfHtered sample
jiucorbic acid method (not in "Standard
Methods")
Brucine sulfate method
No modification
Minor modification to "Standard Methods"
Minor modification to"Standard Methods"
Membrane filter
Membrane filter
Membrane filter (M-enterococcus agar)
Total Residue, porcelain dish
Filtrable residue, Gooch crucible
No modifications
No modifications
1, 10 phenanthroline
Barium sulfate
Petroleum ether extraction
272
------- |