-------
Section No. 3.13.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 10
prepared as a calibration standard, in place of the wet test I)
meter. This procedure should be used only after obtaining
approval of the Administrator.
Posttest Calibration Check - After each field test series
for Method 6A and after every 30 days of operation for Method 6B,
conduct a calibration check as in Subsection 2.1.2 with the
following exceptions:
1. The leak check is not conducted because a leak should
not be corrected that was present during testing.
2. Three or more revolutions of the dry gas meter may be
used.
3. Only two independent runs need be made.
4. If a temperature-compensating dry gas meter was used,
the calibration temperature for the dry gas meter must be within
6 C (10.8 F) of the average meter temperature observed during the
field test series.
When a lower meter calibration factor is obtained as a
result of an uncorrected leak, the tester should correct the leak
and then determine the calibration factor for the leakless sys- ^^^
tern. If the new calibration factor changes the compliance status fj
of the facility in comparison to the lower factor, either include \ /
this information in the report or consult with the administrator
for reporting procedures. If the calibration factor does not
deviate by >5 percent from the initial calibration factor Y
(determined in Subsection 2.1.2), then the dry gas meter volumes
obtained during the test series are acceptable. If the cali-
bration factor does deviate by >5 percent, recalibrate the meter-
ing system as in Subsection 2.1.2, and for the calculations, use
the calibration factor (initial or recalibration) that yields the
lower gas volume for each test run.
2.2 Thermometers
The thermometers used to measure the temperature of gas
leaving the C02 absorber should be initially compared with a
mercury-in-glass thermometer that meets ASTM E-l No. 63C or 63F
specifications:
1. Place both the mercury-in-glass and the dial type or an
equivalent thermometer in an ice bath. Compare the readings
after the bath stabilizes.
2. Allow both thermometers to come to room temperature.
Compare readings after both stabilize.
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 11
3. The dial type or equivalent thermometer is acceptable if
values agree within 1C (2 F) at both points. If the difference
is greater than 1C (2 F), either adjust or recalibrate the
thermometer until the above criteria are met, or reject it.
4. The thermometer is used as an indicator and accuracy of
readings is not important for field use.
The thermometer(s) on the dry gas meter inlet used to measure
the metered sample gas temperature should be initially compared
with a mercury-in-glass thermometer that meets ASTM E-l No. 63C
or 63F specifications (if the dry gas meter is required, other-
wise, no calibration is required):
1. Place the dial type or an equivalent thermometer and the
mercury-in-glass thermometer in a hot water bath, 40 to 50 C
(104 to 122 F). Compare the readings after the bath stabilizes.
i
2. Allow both thermometers to come to room temperature.
Compare readings after the thermometers stabilize.
3. The dial type or equivalent thermometer is acceptable if
values agree within 3 C (5.4 F) at both points (steps 1 and 2
above) or if the temperature differentials at both points are
within 3 C (5.4°F) and the temperature differential is taped to
the thermometer and recorded on the meter calibration form
(Figure 2.4A or 2.4B).
4. Prior to each field trip, compare the temperature read-
ing of the mercury-in-glass thermometer at room temperature with
that of the thermometer that is part of the meter system. If the
values or the corrected values are not within 6 C (10.8 F) of
each other, replace or recalibrate the meter thermometer.
5. The thermometer must be recalibrated only when the volume
metering system does not pass the posttest calibration.
2.3 Rotameter
The Reference Method does not require that the tester cali-
brate the rotameter. The rotameter should be cleaned and main-
tained according to the manufacturer's instructions. For this
reason, it is recommended that the calibration curve and/or rota-
meter markings be checked upon receipt and then routinely checked
with the posttest meter system check or at the required frequency
for the posttest meter check when a dry gas meter is not used.
The rotameter may be calibrated as follows:
1. Ensure that the rotameter has been cleaned as specified
by the manufacturer, and is not damaged.
s
7.
-------
Section No. 3.13.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 12
2. Use the manufacturer's calibration curve and/or markings
on the rotameter for the initial calibration. Calibrate the rot-
ameter as described in the meter system calibration of Subsection
2.1.2, and record the data on the calibration form (Figure 2.4A
or 2.4B).
3. Use the rotameter for testing if the pretest calculated
calibration is within the range 1.0 +0.05 L/min. If, however,
the calibration point is not within 5 percent, determine a new
flow rate setting, and recalibrate the system until the proper
setting is determined.
4. Check the rotameter calibration with each posttest meter
system check. If the rotameter check is within 10 percent of the
1-L/min setting, the rotameter can be acceptable with proper
maintenance. If, however, the check is not within 10 percent of
the flow setting, disassemble and clean the rotameter and perform
a full recalibration.
2.4 Barometer
The field barometer should be adjusted initially and before
each test series to agree within 2.5 mm (0.1 in.) Hg with a
mercury-in-glass barometer or with the pressure value reported
from a nearby National Weather Service Station and corrected for
elevation. The tester should be aware that the pressure readings
are normally corrected to sea level. The uncorrected readings
should be obtained. The correction for the elevation difference
between the weather station and the sampling point should be
applied at a rate of -2.5 mm Hg/30m (-0.1 in. Hg/100 ft) ele-
vation increase, or vice versa for elevation decrease.
The calibration checks should be recorded on the pretest sam-
pling form (Figure 2.5).
2.5 Balance
The balance must be checked prior to each series of weigh-
ings, but not more than once a day. Place the CO2 absorber or a
midget impinger on the balance. Record the weighr. Place a 5 g
Class S weight on the balance and record the weight. The
difference must be 5.0 +_ 0.1 g or the balance must be adjusted,
repaired, or rejected.
o
,
O
-------
Section No. 3.13.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 13
Date /£>/Z*>/e>5~ Calibrated by &£S
Meter box number £~(s
Rotameter
Pretest calibration factor (Y ) acceptable? \S yes no
(within 10 percent of correSt value).
*
Dry Gas Meter (If applicable)
Pretest calibration factor (Y) = /.O2.1 (within 2 percent of
average factor for each calibration run).
Gas Meter Thermometer (If applicable)
Temperature correction necessary? yes __^_no
(within 3 C (5.4 F) of reference values for calibration and
within 6 C (10.8 F) of reference values for calibration
check).
If yes, temperature correction
Barometer
Field barometer reading correct? r yes no
(within 2.5 mm (0.1 in) Hg of mercury-in-glass barometer).
Balance
Was the pretest calibration of the balance correct? ^yes no
(within 0.05 g of true value using Class S weights).
*
Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
Figure 2.5. Pretest sampling checks,
-------
Section No. 3.13.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 14
o
Table 2.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR CALIBRATION OF EQUIPMENT
Apparatus
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Wet test meter
Capacity of at least
2 L/min and an accur-
acy within 1.0%
Calibrate initially and
then yearly by liquid
displacement
Adjust until
specifications
are met, or
return to man-
ufacturer
Dry gas meter
Y = Y^0.02Y at a
flow rate of about
1 L/min
Calibrate vs. wet test
meter initially and when
the posttest check is
not within Y+0.05Y
Repair and
then recali-
brate or re-
place
CO- absorber
thermometer
Within 1°C (2°F)
of true value
Calibrate each ini-
tially as a separate
component against a
mercury-in-glass ther-
mometer
Adjust, deter-
mine a con-
stant correc-
tion factor,
or reject
O
Dry gas meter
thermometer
Within 3°C (5.4°F)
of true value
Calibrate initially
and recalibrate when
the meter system
does not pass the
posttest check
As above
Rotameter
Clean and maintain
according to manu-
facturer's instruc-
tions (required);
calibrate to *_ 5%
(recommended)
Initially and after
each field trip for
Method 6A and every
30 days of operation
for Method 6B
Adjust and re-
calibrate, or
reject
Barometer
^2.5 mm (0.1 in.)
Hg of mercury-in-
glass barometer or
of weather station
value
Calibrate initially
using a mercury-in-
glass barometer; check
before and after each
field test
Adjust to agree
with certified
barometer
Balance
Weigh impinger
and COy absorb-
er to + 0.1 g
Check prior to each
series of weighings
Adjust to agree,
repair, or
reject
/•'
-------
Section No. 3.13.3
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
3.0 PRESAMPLING OPERATIONS
The quality assurance activities for presampling preparation
are summarized in Table 3.1 at the end of this section. See
Section 3.0 of this Handbook for details on preliminary site
visits.
3. 1 Apparatus Check and Calibration
Figure 3.1 or a similar form is recommended to aid the tester
in preparing an equipment checklist, status report form, and
packing list.
3.1.1 Sampling Train - The schematic of the SO2 train is given
in Figure 1.1. Commercial models of this system are available.
Each individual or fabricated train must be in compliance with
the specifications in the Method, Section 3.5.10.
3.1.2 Probe - The probe should be cleaned internally by brushing
first with tap water, then with deionized distilled water, and
finally with acetone. Allow probe to dry in the air. In extreme
cases, the glass or stainless steel liner can be cleaned with
stronger reagents; the objective is to leave the liner free from
contaminants. The probe's heating system should be checked to
see that it is operating properly. The probe must be leak free
when sealed at the inlet or tip and checked for leaks at a vacuum
of 250 mm (10 in.) Hg with the meter box. Any leaks should be
corrected. The liner should be sealed inside the metal sheath to
prevent diluent air from entering the source since most stacks
are under negative pressure.
3.1.3 Midget Bubblers, Midget Impingers, and Glass Connectors -
All glassware should be cleaned with detergent and tap water,
and then with deionized distilled water. Any items that do not
pass a visual inspection for cracks or breakage must be repaired
or discarded.
3.1.4 C02 Absorber - The cylinders or bottles may be packed with
the Ascarite, numbered, weighed, and sealed in the laboratory
prior to the field trip. If molecular sieve material is used,
ensure that it has been regenerated as described in Subsection
1.4.1.
3.1.. 5 Valve and Rotameter - Prior to each field trip or at any
sign of erratic behavior, the flow control valve and rotameter
should be cleaned according to the maintenance procedure recom-
mended by the manufacturer.
3.1.6 Pump - The vacuum pump and oiler should be serviced as
recommended by the manufacturer, every 3 months, or upon erratic
behavior (nonuniform or insufficient pumping action).
-------
Section No. 3.13.3
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
Apparatus check
Probe
Type liner
Glass X
Stainless
steel
Other
Heated properly
Leak checked on
sampling train
Filter or Filter
Assembly
Glass wool X
Other
Glassware
Midget bubbler
Midget impinger
Size rJ/A
Type MM
•
Meter System
With timer
Without timer j<
Leak- free pump*
Rate meter*
Dry gas meter*
Reagents
Distilled water
H202, 30%
isopropanol, 100%*
(for Method 6A)
Drierite
Ascarite X"
or 5A molecular
sieve*
Other
Barometer
C02 absorber
column
Balance
Acceptable
Yes
/
S
l/
v/
S
v/
I/
S
•"
•/
^
\S
S
S
\s
s
No
Quantity
required
f
f 0l€f-~of-
-------
Section No. 3.13.3
Date July 1, 1986
Page 3
3.1.7 Dry Gas Meter - A dry-gas meter calibration check should
be made in accordance with the procedure in Section 3.13.2. An
acceptable posttest check from the previous test is sufficient.
3.1.8 Thermometers - The thermometers should be compared with
the mercury-in-glass thermometer at room temperature prior to
each field trip, ;
3.1.9 Barometer - The field barometer should be compared with
either the mercury-in-glass barometer or a National Weather
Service Station prior to each field trip.
3.1.10 Balance - Check balance with Class S weights using proce-
dures from Subsection 2.5 and pack in rigid foam container.
3.1.11 Other Sampling Apparatus - Other sampling equipment, such
as Mae West bubblers and rigid cylinders for moisture absorption,
which require sample or reagent volumes other than those speci-
fied in this procedure for full effectiveness, may be used sub-
ject to the approval of the Administrator.
3.2 Reagents and Equipment
3.2.1 Sampling - The midget bubbler solution.(for Method 6A) is
prepared by mixing 80 ml of isopropanol (100 percent) with 20 ml
of water. Thexmidget impinger absorbing reagent is prepared by
diluting 100 ml of 30 percent hydrogen peroxide to 1 liter with
water for Method 6A or 250 ml of 30 percent hydrogen peroxide to
1 liter with water for Method 6B. All reagents must be prepared
fresh for each test series, using ACS reagent grade chemicals.
Solutions containing isopropanol must be kept in sealed contain-
ers to prevent evaporation. Twenty five (25) g of Drierite is
needed for each sample collection. Sufficient quantity should be
brought in a sealed container.
3.2.2 Sample Recovery - Deionized distilled water is required on
site for quantitative transfer of impinger solutions to storage
containers. This water and isopropanol are used to clean the
midget bubbler after testing and prior to taking another sample.
3.3 Packaging Equipment for Shipment
Equipment should be packed in rigid containers to protect it
against rough handling during shipping and field operations (not
mandatory).
3.3.1 Probe - The inlet and outlet of the probe must be sealed
and protected from breakage. A suggested container is a wooden
case lined with polyethylene foam or other suitable packing
material; the case should have separate compartments for individ-
ual devices. The case should be equipped with handles or eye
-------
Section No. 3.13.3
Date July 1, 1986
Page 4
hooks that can withstand hoisting, and should be rigid to prevent ( )
bending or twisting during shipping and handling. ^—^
3.3.2 Midget Bubblers, Impingers, Connectors, and Assorted
Glassware - All bubblers, impingers, and glassware should be
packed in a rigid container and protected by polyethylene foam or
other suitable packing material. Individual compartments for
glassware help to organize and protect each item. The impinger
train may be charged and assembled in the laboratory if sampling
is to be performed within 24 hours.
3.3.3 COg Absorber and Volumetric Glassware - A rigid container
lined wirhpolyethylene foam material protects C02 absorber and
assorted volumetric glassware.
3.3.4 Meter Box - The meter box (if required)—which contains
the valve,rotameter, vacuum pump, dry gas meter, and thermom-
eters—should bo packed in a rigid shipping container unless its
housing is strong enough to protect components during travel.
Additional pump oil should be packed if oil is required for
operation. It is advisable to ship a spare meter box in case of
equipment failure.
3.3.5 Wash Bottles and Storage Containers - Storage containers
and miscellaneous glassware may bo safelytransported, if packed
in a rigid foam-lined container. Samples being transported in /"""N
the containers should be protected from extremely high ambient ( j
temperatures (>50 C or about 120 F). ^-^
-------
Section No. 3.13-3
Date July 1, 1986
Page 5
Table 3.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR PRESAMPLING OPERATIONS
Operation
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Apparatus
Probe
1. Probe liner free
of contaminants
2. Probe leak free at
at 250 mm (10 in.) Hg
3. No moisture conden-
sation
1. Clean probe internal-
ly by brushing with tap
water, then deionized
distilled water, then
acetone; allow to dry in
air before test
2. Visual check before
test
Check out heating system
initialy and when mois-
ture appears during
testing
1. Retrace
cleaning pro-
cedure and
assembly
2. Replace
3. Repair or
replace
Midget bubbler,
midget impin-
ger, CO- ab-
sorber, and
glass con-
nectors
Clean and free of
breaks, cracks, etc.
Clean with detergent,
tap water, and then
with deionized dis-
tilled water
Repair or
discard
Flow control
valve and
rotameter
Clean and without sign
of erratic behavior
(such as ball not
moving freely)
Clean prior to each
field trip or upon
erratic behavior
Repair or
return to
manufacturer
Vacuum pump
Maintain sampling rate
of about 1 L/min up
to 250 mm (10 in.) Hg
Service every 3 mo or
upon erratic behavior;
check oiler jars every
10th test
As above
Dry gas meter
(if required)
Clean and within 2%
of calibration factor
Calibrate according to
Sec. 3.13.2; check for
excess oil if oiler is
used
As above
Balance
(continued)
Accurate to within
0.1 g
Check with Class S
weights
As above
-------
Section No. 3-13-3
Date July 1, 1986
Page 6
Table 3.1. (continued)
o
Operation
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Reagents
Sampling
1. Requires all ACS
grade reagents
2. New C02
absorber material
1. Prepare fresh daily
and store in sealed
containers
2. Purchase new
1. Prepare new
reagent
2. Reorder
Sample recovery
Requires deionized
distilled water on
site
Use water and reagent
grade isopropanol to
clean midget bubbler
after test and before
sampling
Prepare new
reagent
Package Equip-
ment for Ship-
ment
Probe
Protect with poly-
ethylene foam
Prior to each ship-
ment
Repack
O
Midget bubbler,
impingers, con-
nectors , and
assorted glass-
ware
Pack in rigid con-
tainers with poly-
ethylene foam
As above
As above
C0? absorber,
volumetric
glassware
Sturdy container
lined with foam
As above
As above
Meter box
Meter box case and/or
container to protect
components; pack spare
meter box and oil
As above
As above
Wash bottles
and storage
containers
Pack in rigid foam-
lined container
As above
As above
Balance
Pack in rigid foam-
lined container
As above
As above
O
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
4.0 ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
On-site activities may include transporting the equipment to
the test site, unpacking and assembling, sampling for sulfur
dioxide and carbon dioxide analyses, and recording the data. In
general for Method 6B, the equipment would be maintained at or
near the test site and testing would be on a more routine basis.
Since Method 6B is used to determine a daily average, facilities
should consider running duplicate Method 6B sampling trains. One
Method 6B sampling train would be designated as the primary and
the other would be the backup train. This would prevent the loss
of data, provide a check of sampling problems, provide sampling
precision data, and provide a complete backup sample system for
when the primary train is inoperable. The additional manpower
requirements should not be significant when compared to the
possible gain in emissions data recovery. The on-site quality
assurance activities are summarized in Table 4.1 at the end of
this section.
4.1 Transport of Equipment to the Sampling Site
The most efficient means of transporting the equipment from
ground level to the sampling site (often above ground level)
should be decided during the preliminary site visit or by prior
correspondence. Care should be taken to prevent damage to the
equipment or injury to test personnel during the moving. A
laboratory type area should be designated for preparation of the
absorbing reagents, for charging of the bubblers and impingers,
and for sample recovery and analyses.
4.2 Preliminary Measurements and Setup
The Reference Method outlines the procedure used to deter-
mine the concentration of sulfur dioxide in the gas stream in
terms of pounds of sulfur dioxide per million Btu's. The accu-
racy of the equipment after transport to the sampling site and
possible rough handling can be determined by making a one-point
check of the rotameter reading against the dry gas meter reading
at the test site. Use Equation 3 in Figure 2.4A or 2.4B and
substitute dry gas meter readings in place of wet test meter
readings (i.e., Vd = V ). The value Y . should be between 0.9
and 1.1; if not, the meter box has lost its rate or volume
calibration. The tester can still use the meter box, but the
data should not be released for decision making until a posttest
recalibration has been made. If the dry gas meter calibration
factor did change, the dry gas meter volumes may have to be
corrected. Record the test identification number on the appro-
priate sampling form, Figure 4.1 (for Method 6A) or Figure 4.2
(for Method 6B).
-------
ro
Plant name
Sample location $/Ur fi/0-
Operator
Barometric pressure, mm (jjrt) Hg
Probe material
Meter box number
J
Ambient temperature, C
Initial leak check /
2-SC
Final leak check Q.OQl, L./t*i*(3>
tta
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
City
Date
o
/ '
Sample number
Probe length m J^tT_
Probe heater setting
Meter calibration factor (Y)
Sampling point location I3$t*\
Sample purge time, min
Remarks
'/""
Sampling
time,
min
0
$•
/O
l£
2o
2£
Total
z£
Clock
time,
24 h
not
iio£
it to
Illb
II2D
/US'
Sample
volume,
L &?]
IZ0.2-0
IZS'.ZO
130. 10
/3S.20
140. Zb
14-5.20
Total
J^.OO
Sample
flow rate
setting,
L/min
4^/n±nf
— •
1-0
Lo
LO
ID
i.o
Sample
volume
metered
L^i
S.I
4-6
&
&o
6~.0
Vm Z.D
avg
Percent
deviation,
%
— -
z
4-
Z
0
0
Avg y /
dev A^
Dry gas
meter
temp ,
°c^7
. —
Zl
23
3o
50
50
Avg
z<\
Impinger
temp,
°c&r
—
n
2o
^0
to
to
Max
temp^--^
O
a Percent deviation = m " m avg x 100 (must be within 10 percent)
Vm avg
Figure 4.1. Field sampling data form for Method 6A.
O
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 3
PC
Plant
Sample location
Operator
Run No.
orte*-
?>/**-(-
Ak. 3
Sampling period
Dry Gas Meter
Final reading 744.
Start:
Stop:
Date
Date
Initial leak check
Final leak check 2
Recovery date
Recovered by
/Q/fi/Bf
6>stU/
t«»<-
tpn*i
6l3>l &S~
Time
Time
Initial reading 7/^.32. L
Volume metered 27.02- L
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor, Y
Rotameter
Initial setting
Final setting
L or cc/min
L or cc/min
/.£/7
Meter Temperature
Barometric Pressure
73
/O'.^O,
Probe Temperature
Initial /OO F
Final 100 °F
°F
^n time
Filter Temperature
Initial /2.0 °F
Final 12~O °F
2*?. 73 in. Hg
/ ' O : ^-S~^ii\ time
Ascarite Column
Final wt 3/ 2. / g
Inital wt 303. (f g
Net wt 8-5"" g of CO,
Moisture
Final wt
Initial wt
Net wt
1st bubbler 2nd impinger 3rd impinger 4th bubbler
/3./ g
73.1 g
0 •() g
Total moisture
07.3 g
oV^.O g
2.O g
3-6
&o.^>
68-2-
6.1
g
g
g
g
.20
7to. r g
93~-2- g
/•^" g
% spent
RECOVERED SAMPLE (If Applicable)
H2°2
container no.
AP"
Impinger contents
container no. AP~I
H2O blank
container no. frf>-IV\J&
Samples stored and locked
Received by
Remarks
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Date
Figure 4.2.
Method 6B sampling, sample recovery, and sample
integrity data form.
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 4
o
4.3 Sampling
The on-site sampling includes the following steps:
1. Preparation and/or addition of the absorbing reagents
to the midget bubblers and impingers and C02 absorber.
2. Setup of the sampling train.
3. Connection to the electrical service.
4. Preparation of the probe (leak check of entire sampling
train and addition of particulate filter).
5. Insertion of the probe into the stack.
6. Sealing the port.
7. Checking the temperature of the probe.
8. Sampling.
9. Recording the data in Figure 4.1.
A final leak check of the train is always performed after samp- ( J
ling. ^^
4.3.1 Preparation and/or Addition of Absorbing Reagents to Col-
lection System - Absorbing reagents can be prepared on site, if
necessary, according to the directions in Section 3.13.3.
For Method 6A
1. Use a pipette or a graduated cylinder to introduce 15
ml of 80 percent isopropanol (IPA) into the midget bubbler or
into a graduated impinger bottle. Do not use the pipette or
graduated cylinder that was used to add the hydrogen peroxide
solution without cleaning. Pipettes or graduated cylinders
should be marked for use of H->Oo or IpA to minimize any pos-
sibility of introducing hydrogen peroxide into the isopropanol.
The accuracy of a pipette is not required but may be used for
convenience.
2. Add 15 ml of 3 percent hydrogen peroxide to each of the
two midget impingers (100 ml of 30 percent H202 to 1 liter with
water).
3. Pack glass wool into the top of the first midget
bubbler to prevent sulfuric acid mist from entering the midget
impingers and causing a high bias for SO.,. /*~NS
u
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 5
4. Add about 25 g of Drierite to the last midget bubbler.
5. Calibrate the balance by initially placing a C02
absorber or midget impinger on the balance and recording the
weight. Then add a 5 g or 10 g Class S weight. The difference
must be accurate to within 0.05 g. (Calibrate only once a day.)
6. Weigh each impinger and bubbler, including contents, to
the nearest 0.1 g, and record the data on the sample recovery and
integrity form (Figure 4.3).
7. With one end of the C02 absorber sealed, place glass
wool in the cylinder to a depth of about 1 cm. Place about 150 g
of Ascarite II in the cylinder on top of the glass wool, and fill
the remaining space in the cylinder with glass wool. Assemble
the cylinder as shown in Figure 4.4. With the cylinder in a
horizontal position, rotate it around the horizontal axis. The
C02 absorbing material should remain in position during the
rotation, and no open spaces or channels should be formed. If
necessary, pack more glass wool into the cylinder to make the
CO- absorbing material stable. Clean the outside of the cylinder
of loose dirt and moisture, and weigh at room temperature to the
nearest 0.1 g. Record this initial mass on the data form
(Figure 4.3). It is strongly recommended that a second, smaller
C02 absorber containing Ascarite or Ascarite il be added in line
downstream of the primary C02 absorber as a breakthrough indi-
cator. Ascarite II turns white when C02 is absorbed. The C02
absorber may be pre-packed.
For Method 6B
1. The first midget bubbler remains empty or dry. It is
also advisable to break off the stem to prevent the solutions
from backing up into the probe.
2. Add 15 ml of X> percent hydrogen peroxide to each of the
two midget impingers (250 ml of 30 percent H202 to 1 liter with
distilled water).
3. Add about 25 g of Drierite to the last bubbler or more
to a cylinder.
4. Weigh each impinger or bubbler including contents, to
the nearest 0.1 g and record the data on the sample data form
(Figure 4.2). Note: If large impingers are used more solution
should be added and more Drierite used.
5. With one end of the C02 absorber sealed, place glass
wool in the cylinder to a depth of about 1 cm. Place about 150 g
of Ascarite II in the cylinder on top of the glass wool, and fill
the remaining space in the cylinder with glass wool. Assemble
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 6
1st bubbler 2nd impinger 3rd impinger 4th bubbler
Final wt Sf.y g ffr.g g 66.4 g
Initial wt ffr.2. g 66.2- g 07-f g
o
Ascarite column: Final wt 304-. 7 g
Initial wt 300>l g
Net wt f .(f g of C02
% spent
Recovered Sample
H2°2 blan^ LJ) i»n Liquid level
container no. /Tr- //TP marked
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Received by yjJMjfl. ftLUJL^ Date
J
Remarks
Net wt --0.3 q 2-.6 q 0-^ g <9.£T
Total moisture 3-3 g /£> % spent
Impinger contents , Liquid level ( )
container no. Ar~l marked jX V_x
H20 blank Liquid level
container no. nP"lV(c> marked
Figure 4.3. Method 6A sample recovery and integrity data form.
O
oL-
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 7
the cylinder as shown in Figure 4.4. With the cylinder in a hor-
izontal position, rotate it around the horizontal axis. The C0?
absorbing material should remain in position during the rotation,
and no open spaces or channels should be formed. If necessary,
pack more glass wool into the cylinder to make the CO,, ab-
sorbing material stable. Clean the outside of the cylinder of
loose dirt and moisture, and weigh at room temperature to the
nearest 0.1 g. Record this initial mass on the data form (Figure
4.2). If Method 6B is to be operated in a low sample flow
condition (less than 100 ml/min), molecular sieve material may be
substituted for Ascarite II as the C02 absorbing material;
however, 250 g of sieve material should be used and it must have
been regenerated prior to use. The recommended molecular sieve
material is Union Carbide 1/16 inch pellets, 5&, or equivalent.
Molecular sieve material need not be discarded following the
sampling run provided it is regenerated. Use of molecular sieve
material at flow rates higher than 100 ml/min may cause erroneous
CO, results. It is recommended that a second, smaller CO2
absorber containing Ascarite II be added in line downstream of
the primary C02 absorber as a breakthrough indicator. Ascarite
II turns whire when CO2 is absorbed. The CO2 absorber may be
pre-packed, however molecular sieve must be weighed the day of
testing.
4.3.2 Assembling the Sampling Train - After assembling the
sampling train as shown in Figure 1.1, perform the following:
1. Ensure that the CO~ absorber is mounted in a vertical
position with the entrance at the bottom to prevent channeling of
gases.
2. Adjust probe heater to operating temperature. Place
crushed ice and water around the impingers and bubblers.
3. Leak check the sampling train Just prior to use at the
sampling site (not mandatory) by temporarily attaching a rota-
meter (capacity of 0 to 40 ml/min) to the outlet of the dry gas
meter and placing a vacuum gauge at or near the probe inlet.
Plug the probe inlet, pull a vacuum of at least 250 mm (10 in.)
Hg, and note the flow rate indicated by the rotameter. A leakage
rate <2 percent of the average sampling rate is acceptable. The
Method 6B constant rate low flow sampling train (20 to 40 ml/min)
will be checked by placing a U-tube water manometer at or near
the probe inlet. A vacuum of at least 20 in. H2O should be
pulled; the sample valve should be shut and then the pump should
be turned off. The system must not lose more than 0.25 in.
vacuum in 2 minutes. Note; Carefully release the probe inlet
plug before turning off the pump. Observe the impingers during
the leak check to ensure that none of the solution is transferred
to another impinger and that the glass wool (if applicable) is
not wetted. If this occurs, the impinger section of the train
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 8
o
SAMPLE
GAS
.RUBBER STOPPER
-GLASS WOOL
ASCARITE
GLASS WOOL
RUBBER
STOPPER
O
OUTLET
Figure 4.4. C02 absorber.
O
/ S n
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 9
must be prepared again. It is suggested (but not mandatory) that
the pump be leak checked separately, either prior to or after the
sampling run. If prior to the run, the pump leak check shall
follow the train leak check. To leak check the pump, proceed as
follows. Place a vacuum gauge at the inlet to the pump. Pull a
vacuum of 250 mm (10 in.) Hg. Plug or pinch off the outlet of
the flow meter, and then turn off the pump. The vacuum should
remain stable for at least 30 seconds.
4. Place a loosely packed filter of glass wool in the end
of the probe, and connect the probe to the bubbler. Alternately,
if the out-of-stack filter is used, it should be packed prior to
attaching the probe filter assembly to the bubbler.
5. Other sampling equipment, such as Mae West bubblers and
rigid cylinders for moisture absorption, which requires sample or
reagent volumes other than those specified in this procedure for
full effectiveness, may be used subject to the approval of the
Administrator. An example of an alternative' sampling train used
successfully in the collaborative testing program is shown in
Figure 4.5.
4.3.3 Sampling - For Method 6A, the sampling shall be conducted
at a constant rate of approximately 1.0 L/min. For Method 6B,
the sampling shall be conducted either (1) intermittently with at
least 12 equal flows (approximately 1.0 L/min), evenly spaced
sampling collections of between 2 to 4 minutes over a 24-hour
period, or (2) continuously at a rate of between 20 to 40 ml/min
for the 24-hour period. The intermittent Method 6B sampling
method is the recommended system for Method 6B testing because it
uses Method 6 sampling components. The detailed procedures for
each method are described below.
Note: For applications downstream of wet scrubbers, a
heated out-of-stack filter (either borosilicate glass wool or
glass fiber mat) is necessary. The filter may be a separate
heated unit or may be within the heated portion of the probe. If
the filter is within the sampling probe, the filter should not be
within 15 cm of the probe inlet or any unheated section of the
probe, such as the connection to the first SO2 absorber. The
probe and filter should be heated to at least 20 C above the
source temperature, but not greater than 120 C. The filter
temperature (i.e., the sample gas temperature) should be moni-
tored to assure the desired temperature is maintained. A heated
Teflon connector may be used to connect the filter holder or
probe to the first impinger.
Constant Rate Sampling for Method 6A - Sampling is performed
at a constant rate of approximately 1.0 L/min as indicated by the
rotameter during the entire sampling run. The procedure is as
follows:
-------
HEATED
GLASS WOOL
FILTER
HEATED PROBE
Method 6A*
A - 15 ml of Isopropanol
B - 15 ml of 3% H202
C - 15 ml of 150 g of Drierite
E - approx 250 g of Ascarite
Method 6B
A -
B -
C -
D -
Empty
15 ml of >6%
15 ml of >6%
approx 150 g
H2°2
Ho°o
ol I
irierite
E - approx 150 g of Ascarite
* This Method 6A train was
not used during collaborative
testing.
(
il
j|
!
!i
(
A
!
ii
Ij
ij
) (
B
Ij
!
i!
ii
!)
J
C
MAE WEST IMPINGERS
D
DRIERITE
COLUMN
THERMOMET
=5
CO 2
ABSORBER
NEEDLE VALVE
DRY
[ GAS
V METER
SURGE
TANK
(optional) TIMER
T) a co
cu p (D
CQ rt O
(D CD ft
P-
M Q O
O C D
Figure 4.5. Alternative sampling train.
VO M
OJ CO
cn •
O
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 11
1. Place crushed ice and water around the impingers.
2. Record the initial dry gas meter readings, barometer
reading, and other data as indicated in Figure 4.1. Double check
the dry gas meter reading and check the midget bubbler to be sure
that no hydrogen peroxide has been allowed to siphon back and wet
the glass wool.
3. Position the tip of the probe at the sampling point,
connect the probe to the bubbler, and start the pump. Warning;
If the stack is under a negative pressure of >50 mm (2 in.) H!O
vacuum, the probe should be positioned at the sampling point, tne
sample pump started prior to probe connection, and then the probe
immediately connected to the impinger to prevent the impinger
solutions from being siphoned backwards and contaminating the
isopropanol and glass wool. Alternatively, the first impinger
stem may be broken off and/or a check valve placed in the system.
4. Adjust the sample flow to a constant rate of approxi-
mately 1.0 L/min as indicated by the rotameter.
5. Maintain this constant rate within 10 percent during
the entire sampling run, and take readings (dry gas meter; rate
meter; and temperatures at the dry gas meter and the C02 absorber
outlet) at least every 5 minutes. Add more ice during the run to
keep the temperature of the gases leaving the last impinger at 20
C (68 F) or less. Salt may be added to the ice bath to further
reduce the temperature.
6. Refer to emission standards for minimum sampling time
and/or volume. (For example, the Federal standard for fossil
fuel-fired steam generators specifies a minimum sampling time of
20 minutes and a minimum sampling volume of 20 liters corrected
to standard conditions.) The total sample volume at meter condi-
tions should be approximately 28 liters (1 ft ). Make a quick
calculation near the end of the run to guarantee that sufficient
sample volume has been drawn; if the volume is insufficient,
sample for an additional 5 minutes.
7. Turn off the pump at the conclusion of each run, remove
probe from the stack, and record the final readings. Warning:
Again, if the stack is under a negative pressure, disconnect the
probe first, and turn off the pump immediately thereafter or have
the first impinger modified and a check valve added.
8. Conduct a leak check, as described in Subsection 4.3.2
(mandatory).
9. If the train passes the leak check, drain the ice bath
and purge the remainder of the train by drawing clean ambient air
through the system for 15 minutes at the sampling rate. To
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 12 >—v
provide clean ambient air, pass air through a charcoal filter ^—'
or through an extra midget impinger containing 15 ml of 3 per-
cent H?02. The tester may opt to use ambient air without
purification or to use only a filter. Note; It is important to
drain or remove the ice and water to allow the isopropanol to
warm.
10. If the train fails the leak check, either void the run
or use an alternative procedure acceptable to the Administrator
to adjust the sample volume for leakage. An alternative proce-
dure that may be acceptable to the Administrator is described at
the end of this subsection.
11. Calculate the sampling rate during the purging of the
sample. The sample volume ( V) for each point should be within
10 percent of the average sample volume for all points. If the
average of all points is within the specified limit, the sample
rate is acceptable. Noncompliance with the +;10 percent of
constant rate for a single sample should not have a significant
effect on the final results of the test for noncyclic processes.
However, the Administrator should be consulted as to the accept-
ability of the sample collection run results.
12. Change the particulate filter (glass-wool plug) at the
end of each test since particulate buildup oh the probe filter
may result in a loss of SO.- due to reactions with particulate
matter. z
Intermittent Sampling for Method 6B - Sampling is performed
at a rate of approximately 1.0 L/min as indicated by the rota-
meter. It is conducted for 12 equally spaced intervals; the
sample collection periods are 2 to 4 minutes in length. The
Method 6B sample train has the same sample train components as
the Method 6A sample train with the exception of an addition of
an industrial timer switch, designed to operate in the "on"
position from 2 to 4 minutes on a 2-hour repeating cycle or other
cycle specified in the applicable regulation. At a minimum, the
sample operation should include at least 12 equal, evenly spaced
periods of sampling per 24 hours and, for the amount of sampling
reagents prescribed in this Method, the total sample volume
collected should be between 25 and 60 liters. The sample
procedure is as follows:
1. Add cold water to the container holding the impingers
until the impingers and bubblers are covered on at least two-
thirds of their length. The impingers, bubbler, and their con-
tainer must be covered and protected from intense heat and direct
sunlight. If freezing conditions exist, the impinger solution
and the water bath must be protected.
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 13
2. Record the initial dry gas meter readings, probe/filter
temperatures, and other data as indicated in Figure 4.2. Double
check the dry gas meter reading and ensure the impinger and
bubbler container has the proper amount of cold water and is pro-
tected from extreme heat or cold.
3. Position the tip of the probe at the sampling point,
connect the probe to the bubbler, and turn on the time and start
the pump. Warning; If the stack is under a negative pressure of
>50 mm (2 in.) H2O, the probe should be positioned at the
sampling point, tne sample pump turned on, and then the probe
immediately connected to the impinger to prevent the impinger
solutions from being siphoned backwards and contaminating the
system. The first impinger must be modified by breaking off the
stem and adding a check valve.
4. Adjust the sample flow to a constant rate of approx-
imately 1.0 L/min as indicated by the rotameter.
5. Observe the sample train operations until the con-
clusion of the first 2- to 4-minute sample collection period.
Determine the volume of sample collected and make a quick
calculation to ensure that the volume from the given number of
equal, evenly spaced sample collection periods will be within the
specified sample volume (i.e., 25 to 60 liters).
6. During the 24-hour sampling period, record the dry gas
meter temperature and barometric pressure one time between
9:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m.
7. At the conclusion of the 24-hour period, turn off the
timer and the sample pump, remove the probe from the stack, and
record the final gas meter volume reading, the probe/filter
temperature and rotameter setting.
8. Conduct a leak check as described in Subsection 4.3.2.
If a leak is found, void the test run or use procedures accept-
able to the Administrator to adjust the sample volume for leak-
age. An alternative procedure that may be acceptable to the
Administrator is included at the end of this Subsection.
9. Check the final probe temperature, filter temperature,
and total sample volume to ensure that all systems are still
working properly.
10. For scrubbed units change the filter material prior to
the next sample run to ensure that the collected materials do not
scrub the SO0. For unscrubbed units change the filter weekly.
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 14
Note; Method 6B does not require a purge at the completion ( )
of the sample run since the train does not include isopropanol. —
Constant Rate Sampling for Method 6B - Sampling is performed
at a constant rate of between 20 to 40 ml/min as indicated by the
rotameter during the entire sampling run. Lower flow rates and
longer sampling intervals have been more successful for some
applications. The procedure is as follows:
1. Add cold water to the container holding the impingers
until the impingers and bubblers are covered on at least two-
thirds of their length. The impingers and bubbler, and their
container, must be covered and protected from intense heat and
direct sunlight. If freezing conditions exist, the impinger
solution and the water bath must be protected.
2. Record the initial dry gas meter readings, probe/filter
temperature, and other data as indicated in Figure 4.2. Double
check the dry gas meter reading and ensure the impinger and
bubbler container has the proper amount of cold water and is
protected from extreme heat or cold.
3. Position the tip of the probe at the sampling point,
connect the probe to the bubbler, and start the pump. Warning;
If the stack is under a negative pressure of >50 mm (2 in.) HoO'
the probe should be positioned at the sampling point, the sample
pump turned on, and then the probe immediately connected to the
impinger to prevent the impinger solutions from being siphoned
backwards and contaminating the system. The system may be
modified as mentioned above.
4. Adjust the sample flow to a constant rate of between 20
and 40 ml/min as indicated by the rotameter. Maintain this con-
stant rate during the entire test.
5. During the 24-hour sampling period, record the dry gas
meter temperature and the barometric pressure one time between
9:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m.
6. At the conclusion of the 24-hour period, record the
rotameter setting, turn off the pump, remove the probe from the
stack and record the final gas meter volume reading and the
probe/filter temperatures. Warning; Again, if the stack is
under a negative pressure, disconnect the probe first, and turn
off the pump immediately thereafter.
7. Conduct a leak check in the following manner. Attach a
U-tube water manometer to the inlet to the probe. Turn on the
pump and pull a vacuum of 20 in. H20. After the vacuum has
stabilized, shut off the main sample valve and then the pump.
The leakage rate must be less than 0.25 in. over a 2-minute
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
•I: ,,,? Date July 1, 1986
Page 15
period. If the leakage rate is in excess of 0.25 in. H20, void
the test run or use procedures acceptable to the Administrator to
adjust the sample volume. An alternative procedure that may be
acceptable to the Administrator is included at the end of this
Subsection.
8. Check the final probe temperature, filter temperature
and total sample volume to ensure that all systems were func-
tioning, properly.
9. For scrubbed units change the filter material prior to
the next sample run to ensure that the collected material does
not scrub the S02. For nonscrubbed units change the filter
weekly.
10. To conduct the next sample run repeat all the above
steps.
Note: Method 6B does not require a sample purge at the
completion of the sample run since the train does not include
isopropanol.
Alternative Leak Check Procedure for Unacceptable Leak Rates-
The leak check procedure for Method 6A and intermittent Method 6B
require that a vacuum gauge be placed at the probe inlet, a 10
in. Hg vacuum be pulled on the system (as read on the vacuum
gauge), and that the leak rate be checked with a more sensitive
rotameter (0 - 40 ml/min). This system provides a quick indica-
tion when the leak rate is over 4 percent (the rotameter ball
will be pegged). It provides the actual value when the leak rate
is under 4 percent. Thus, these procedures and equipment as
specified do not quantify the leakage rate greater than 4
percent.
In an effort to retain and make useful the maximum amount of
emissions data possible, the following alternative may be accept-
able to the Administrator when an unacceptable leak rate is de-
tected for the Method 6A and intermittent Method 6B trains. This
alternative procedure should be approved by the Administrator
prior to its use.
When an unacceptable post test leak check is detected the
following procedure may be used to compensate for the leak rate
(for Method 6A and intermittent Method 6B). This procedure
assumes that the leak occurred for the duration of the test run
and may bias the results high.
1. After the sample train leakage rate ,is found to be un-
acceptable at 10 in. Hg, release the vacuum in the proper manner
and shut-off the sampling train.
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date Ju
Page 16
Date July 1, 1986 /~"\
2. If the emissions results are to be calculated in terms of
ppm S02 or Ib S02/million Btu without using the results of C0?
collected by the sampling train, the vacuum gauge must be left on
the inlet to the probe. However, if the emissions results are to
be calculated in terms of Ib SC>2 per million Btu using the grams
of C02 collected in the sampling train, the vacuum gauge may be
placed on the inlet to the first impinger of H-CU. Alter-
natively, the gauge may be left at the probe inlet; However, the
leakage correction may then compensate for leakage rates that do
not affect the results in terms of Ib SO2/million Btu.
3. Turn on the pump, and pull a vacuum of 2 in. Hg as shown
by the vacuum gauge.
4. After the vacuum stablizes determine the leak rate by
measuring the volume on the dry gas meter for at least 2 minutes.
5. The leak rate will be used to compensate only for the
mass of S09 in comparison to the C09 as shown in the equation
below. z ^
Equation 4-1
M M Sampling Rate \~^/
S02(corrected) = (SCX,) Sampling Rate - Leak Rate
where
M-.- , . -,. = mass of S00 corrected to compensate
S02(corrected) fQr leakag| rate;
Mqo = mass of SO,, determined for sample
2 analysis;
Sampling Rate = Sample volume divided by the sample time
(continuous sample methods), for the
intermittent method use 1.0 L/min; and
Leak Rate = leak rate determined by this alternative
procedure (metered leak volume divided by
the time checked).
When an unacceptable posttest leak check is detected for the
constant rate Method 6B train, the following procedure may be
used to compensate for the leak rate:
I. After the sampling train leakage rate is found to be
unacceptable at 10 in. of H~0, release the vacuum in the proper
manner and shut off the sampling train.
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 17
2. If the emission results are to be calculated in terms of
ppm S02 or Ib S02/million Btu without using the results of C02
collected by the sampling train, the U-tube manometer must be
left on the inlet to the probe. However, if the emission results
are to be calculated in terms of Ib S02/million Btu using the
grams of C02 collected in the sampling train, the U-tube mano-
meter may be placed on the inlet to the first impinger of H202.
Alternatively, the manometer may be left at the probe infer;
however, the leakage correction may then compensate for leakage
rates that do not affect the results in terms of Ib S0«/million
Btu. *
.3. Attach a 10-ml graduated pipette with a "T" and a bulb
with soap solution to the outlet of the dry gas meter.
4. Turn on the pump and pull a vacuum of 20 in. of H20 as
shown by the manometer.
5. After the vacuum stabilizes, start a bubble up the
pipette. ;
6. Time the movement of the bubble over at least 1.0 ml of
the pipette with a stop watch. Use the integer markings of the
pipette.
7. The leakage rate will be determined by dividing the
.volume by the time.
.8. Use Equation 4-1 to determine the correction for the
determined leakage rate.
4.4 Sample Recovery
The Reference Method requires the weighing and transfer of th^
impinger contents and the connector washings to a polyethy- lene
storage container. This weighing and transfer should be done in
the "laboratory" area to prevent contamination of the test
sample. , -,
After completing the leak check (for Method 6B) or the purge
(for Method 6A), disconnect the impingers and transport them to,,
the cleanup area. The contents of the midget bubbler (contains
isopropanol for Method 6A only) may be discarded after the weight
is determined. However, it is usually advisable to retain this
fraction until analysis is performed on the H2O_. Analysis of
the isopropanol may be useful in detecting cleanup or samplings
errors. Cap off the midget impinger section with the use of
polyethylene or equivalent caps before transport to the cleanup
area.
The sample should be recovered as follows: . .:?/,
-------
4.5 Sample Logistics (Data) and Packing Equipment - The sampling
and sample recovery procedures are followed until the required
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 18
1. Allow the impingers and C02 absorber to come to room
temperature (- 20 C), which should take approximately 10 minutes.
2. If the balance has not been calibrated or has been
moved within the past 24 hours, calibrate it as described in
Subsection 4.3.1 prior to the weighing of the samples.
3. Wipe the outside of the bubblers, impingers, and C02
absorber.
4. Weigh the bubblers, the impingers, and C02 absorber
separately, and record their weights to the nearest 0.1 g on the
proper data sheet (Figure 4.3 for Method 6A and Figure 4.2 for
Method 6B).
5. Method 6A - Transfer the contents of the two impingers
containing solution to a labeled, leak-free, polyethylene sample
bottle. Wash the impingers and connection glassware with three
15 ml portions of water. Place the rinsings in the sample
bottle. The contents of the midget bubbler may be discarded or
saved for analysis if problems are detected in the subsequent
analysis of SO2.
Method 6B - Recover the sample contents from the midget
bubbler and the two midget impingers containing solution. Rinse /•—\
the bubbler, impingers, and connecting glassware with three 15 ml ( J
portions of water. The impinger contents and rinsings should be >—/
transferred to a labeled, leak-free polyethylene sample bottle.
Note; The total rinse and sample volume should be less than
100 ml; a 100-ml mark can be placed on the outside of the poly-
ethylene sample bottle as a guide. Alternatively, if the sample
recovery is conducted in the laboratory, the sample recovery may
be conducted directly into a 100 ml volumetric flask.
Warning; It has been demonstrated that the contamination of
the sample with Ascarite or Drierite will bias the results.
6. Place 100 ml of the absorbing reagent in a polyethylene
bottle, and label it for use as a blank during sample analysis.
An example sample label is shown in Figure 4.6.
7. Mark the liquid level on the outside of all sample
bottles, and ensure that the caps are on tightly providing a
leak-free container.
8. Discard the Ascarite and Drierite material.
O
-------
.Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 19
Plant /4<2#*ti?
Site &>ibr
f~»-
fit*. 3 o*+lri-
Date /P-/0~$S~
Front rinse
Back rinse
Solution ^~
Front filter
_ Back filter
fOOflJL
Volume: Initial 3£>
Cleanup vby,
£,&£>
City skfif iJk&*~£
I
Sample Type ^O^/CO^.
Run Number AP-I
Front solution
Back solution
Level marked
Final
/
V/
en
B
0)
Figure 4.6. Example of a sample label.
number of runs are completed. Log all data on the Sample and
Sample Recovery Data Form, Figure 4.3 (Method 6A) and Figure 4.2
(Method 6B). If the bubbler, impingers, and connectors are to be
used in the next test, they should be rinsed with distilled
water, and the bubbler should be rerinsed with isopropanol (for
Method 6A only). A new or recharged CO~ absorber column should
be inserted into the sampling train, fit the completion "of the
test:
1. Check all sample containers for proper labeling (time,
date, location, number of test, and any pertinent documenta-
tion). Be sure that a blank has been 'taken. '
2. If data is to be removed from the source area, record
all data collected during the field test in duplicate by using
data forms and a field laboratory notebook. One set of data
should be mailed to the base laboratory, and one given to another
team member or to the Agency. Hand carrying the other set (not
mandatory) can prevent a very costly and embarrassing mistake.
3. Examine all sample containers and sampling equipment
for damage, and pack them for shipment to the base laboratory,
being careful to label all shipping containers to prevent loss of
samples or equipment.
4. Make a check of the sampling and sample recovery
procedures using the data form, Figure 4.7 (Method 6A) or Figure
4.8 (Method 6B). • , ;v'« - , ••-.'"' -'
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 20
Sampling
o
Bubbler and impinger contents properly selected, measured, and
placed in proper receptacle?* _ r
Impinger Contents/Parameters
1st: 15 ml of 80 percent isopropanol _ iX
2nd: 15 ml of 3 percent ^2°2* _ —
3rd: 15 ml of 3 percent H202*
4th: approx. 25 g of Drierite*
150 g of Ascarite in C02 absorber?*
Probe heat at proper level?
Crushed ice around impingers?
Pretest leak check at 250 mm (10 in.) Hg?
Leakage rate?
Probe placed at proper sampling point?
Flow rate constant at approximately 1.0 L/min? \s
* ~
Posttest leak check at 250 mm (10 in.) Hg?
f]
Leakage rate? /5 cc-l wi>
Sample Recovery
*
Balance calibrated with Class S weights?
Impingers cleaned and weighed to +0.1 g at room temp?
Contents of impingers and rinsings placed in polyethylene
bottles?
5E
Fluid level marked?
9F
C00 absorber cleaned and weighed to +0.1 g at room temp?
"^ 'T
Sample containers sealed and identified?
Samples properly stored and locked?
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
Figure 4.7. On-Site measurements for Method 6A. v_x
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 21
Sampling
Impinger contents properly selected, measured, and placed in
impingers? _ X^
Impinger Contents/Parameters
1st: Empty* _ X^
2nd: 15 ml of >6 percent H2O2* _ ^
3rd: 15 ml of >6 percent H0O0* ___ X^
_ z ^ -
4th: Approx. 25 g of Drierite* _ X
Approx. 150 g of Ascarite II or 250 g 5A molecular sieve
(continuous flow rate train only) in C02 absorber?* _ X'
Probe heat at proper level? _ _ X
Crushed ice around impingers?
Pretest leak check at 250 mm (10 in.) Hg? _ \s
Leakage rate? _ Q.Q
"' ' "''" ' """''
Probe placed at proper sampling point? _ {X
Flow rate intermittent at approximately 1.0 L/min?* _ X
Flow rate constant between 20 to 40 ml/min? _ A/I A
Posttest leak check at 250 mm (10 in.) Hg?* _ »X
Leakage rate? _ Q.C>
Sample Recovery
Balance calibrated with Class S weights?*
Impingers cleaned and weighed to ^0.1 g at room temp?
Contents of impingers and rinsings placed in polyethylene
bottles? fX
Fluid level marked?*
*s
C02 absorber cleaned and weighed to ^0.1 g at room temp?*
Sample containers sealed and identified?* *s
Samples properly stored and locked?* X
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
Figure 4.8. On-Site measurements for Method 6B
-------
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 22
Table 4.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR ON-SITE MEASUREMENT CHECKS
o
Operation
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Preparation and/
or addition
of absorbing
reagents
Method 6A. Add 15 ml
80% isopropanol to
first midget bubbler,
15 ml of 3% H202
to two midget impin-
gers, approx 25 g of
Drierite to the last
bubbler, and 150 g of
Ascarite to column
Method 6B. Leave first
bubbler empty, add 15
ml of >6% H20- to
the two midget impin-
gers, approximately
25 g of Drierite to the
last midget bubbler, and
150 g of Ascarite to
column
Prepare 3% H_02 fresh
daily; use pipette or
graduated cylinder to
add solutions
Reassemble
collection
system
Prepare >6% H202
fresh daily; use pipette
or graduated cylinder to
add solutions
Reassemble
collection
system
O
Assembling the
sampling train
1. Assemble to speci-
fications in Fig. 1.1
2. A leakage rate <2%
of the average samp-
ling rate
1. Before each sampling
2. Leak check before
sampling (recommended)
by attaching a rotameter
to dry gas meter outlet,
placing a vacuum gauge at
or near probe inlet, and
pulling a vacuum of >250
mm (10 in.) Hg
1. Reassemble
2. Correct
the leak
Sampling
(Method 6A
constant rate)
1. Method 6A
Within 1Q% of a
constant rate
1. Calculate % deviation
for each sample using
equation in Fig. 4.1
1. Repeat
the sam-
pling, or
obtain ac-
ceptance
from a rep-
resentative
of the Admin-
istrator
(continued)
O
v..
-------
Table 4.1. (continued)
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 23
Operation
Sampling
(Method 6B
intermittent)
Acceptance limits
2. Minimum accept-
able time is 20 min
and volume is 20
liters corrected to
STP or as specified
by regulation
3. Less than 2% leak-
age rate at 250 mm
(10 in.) Hg
4. Purge remaining
S0_ from isopropanol
1. At least 12
equally and evenly
spaced intermittent
sample intervals at
about 1.0 L/min
2. Sample time is
24 hours and the
acceptable sample vol-
ume is between 25
and 60 liters
3. Less than 2% leak-
age rate at 250 mm
(10 in.) Hg
Frequency and method
of measurement
2. Make a quick cal-
culation prior to com-
pletion and an exact
calculation after com-
pletion
3. Leak check after
sample run (mandatory);
use same procedure as
above
4. Drain ice, and purge
15 min with clean air
at the sample rate
1. Check the volume of
the first sample inter-
val and the total vol-
ume should be within
10% of first sample
volume times the number
of intervals
2. Make a calculation
after each sample run
3. Leak check after
sample run (mandatory)
Action if
requirements
are not met
2. As above
3. As above
4. As above
1. Repair or
recalibrate time
and/or rotameter
and repeat the
sampling or ob-
tain acceptance
from a represen-
tative of the
Administrator
2. As above
3. Void the
test, or use an
alternative
procedure
acceptable to
a represen-
tative of the
Administrator
(continued)
i
-------
Table 4.1 (continued)
Section No. 3-13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 24
o
Operation
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Sampling
(Method 6B
rate constant)
1. Sample at a con-
stant rate of between
20 and 40 ml/min
1. Calculate sample
rate at the completion
of run
2. Sample time is 24
hours and the accept-
able sample volume
is between 25 and 60
liters
3. Less than 2% leak-
age at 500 mm (20 in.)
2. Calculate sample
volume at end of sample
run
3. Leak check after
sample run (mandatory)
1. Repair or
recalibrate
rotameter, and
repeat run or
obtain accept-
ance from a
representative
of the
Administrator
2. As above
3. Void the
test, or use an
alternative
procedure
acceptable to
a represen-
tative of the
Administrator
O
Sample Recovery
1. Balance accurate
to within 0.1 g
2. Determine mois-
ture collected in
impingers
1. Calibrate with
Class S weights
2. Wipe the outside
of the impingers and
bubblers clean, and
weigh each to the
nearest 0.1 g
1. Adjust, re-
pair, or
reject
2. Repeat run,
or use alter-
native mois-
ture determi-
nation technique
(continued)
O
-------
Table 4.1. (continued)
Section No. 3.13.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 25
Operation
Sample logis-
tics (data)
and packing
Acceptance limits
3. Recover SO,
sample
4. Determine CO,
absorber weight
1. All data are re-
corded correctly
2. All equipment ex-
amined for damage and
labeled for shipment
3. All sample con-
tainers properly
labeled and packaged
Frequency and method
of measurement
3. Place contents of
the two midget
impingers and the rins-
ings in a marked poly-
ethylene bottle
(Method 6A); place con-
tents of the two midget
impingers, the first
midget bubbler, and the
rinsings in a marked
polyethylene bottle
(Method 6B)
4. Wipe clean the out-
side of the CO- absor-
ber, and weigh to the
nearest 0.1 g
1. Visually check upon
completion of each run
and before packing
2. As above
3- Visually check upon
completion of test
Action if
requirements
are not met
3. Repeat run,
or place con-
tents and rins-
ings directly
into the vol-
umetric flask
4, Repeat run,
or weigh ab-
sorber again
1. Complete
the data
form
2. Redo test
if damage
occurred during
testing
3. Correct
when possible
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
5.0 POSTSAMPLING OPERATIONS
Table 5.1 at the end of this section summarizes the quality
assurance activities for postsampling operations.
5.1 Apparatus Check
A posttest check—including a calibration check, the clean-
ing, and/or the performance of routine maintenance—should be
made on most of the sampling apparatus. Cleaning and mainte-
nance of the sampling apparatus are discussed in Section 3.13.7.
Figure 5.1 should be used to record the posttest checks.
5.1.1 Metering System - The metering system has three components
that must be checked: dry gas meter thermometer(s), dry gas
meter, and rotameter.
The dry gas meter thermometer should be checked by comparison
with the ASTM mercury-in-glass thermometer at room temperature.
If the readings agree within 6 C (10.8 F), they are accept-
able. When the readings are outside this limit, the thermometer
must be recalibrated according to Section 3.13.2 after the post-
test check of the dry gas meter. For calculations, the dry gas
meter thermometer reading (fifeld or recalibration) that would
give the higher temperature is used. That is, if the field
reading is higher, no correction of the data is necessary; if the
recalibration value is higher, the difference in the two readings
is added to the average dry gas meter temperature reading.
The posttest checks of the dry gas meter and rotameter are
similar to the initial calibration, as described in Section
3.13.2, but they include the following exceptions:
1. The metering system •should not have had any leaks
corrected prior to the posttest check. ,
2. Three or more revolutions of the dry gas meter are
sufficient.
3. Only two independent runs need be made. If the post-
test dry gas meter calibration factor (Y) does not deviate by >5
percent from the initial calibration factor, the dry gas meter
volumes obtained during the test series are acceptable. If it
deviates by >5 percent, recalibrate the metering system as in
Section 3.13.2 using the calibration factor (initial and
recalibration) that yields the lower gas volume for each test
run. The lesser calibration factor will give the lower gas
volume.
?
The rotameter calibration factor (Y ) can also be determined
during the calibration of the dry gas meter. If Y does not
-------
Section No. 3.13.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
Meter Box Number
Dry Gas Meter (If applicable)
Pretest calibration factor (Y) = I > 02.1
Posttest check (Y) = _ /.£>33 (+5 percent of pretest
factor)* ,
Recalibration required? yes * no
If yes, recalibration factor (Y) = _ (within 2 percent of
calibration factor for each calibration run)
Lower calibration factor Y (pretest or posttest) =
for calculations
Rotameter
Pretest calibration factor (Y ) = /•'
Posttest check (Y ) = /./ ( within 10 percent of pretest
factor) r
Recalibration recommended? yes s no
If performed, recalibration factor (Y ) = _ _ ''_
Was rotameter cleaned? _ _yes no
Dry Gas Meter Thermometer (If applicable)
o
Was a pretest meter temperature correction used? _ yes no
If yes, temperature correction _ _ _
Posttest recalibration required? yes / no (recalibrated
when Y- recalibrated)
LJ
Barometer
Was pretest field barometer reading correct? * yes _ no
o
Posttest recalibration required? yes __j/_no (recalibrated
when YL recalibrated)
Balance*
Was the balance calibration acceptable? tX^yes no
(;+ 0.05 g checked against Class S weights)
If no, the balance should be repaired or replaced prior to
weighing field samples.
* Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
Figure 5.1. Posttest sampling checks.
O
-------
Section No. 3.13.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 3
deviate by >10 percent from the initial calibration factor, the
rotameter operation is acceptable. If Y changes by >10 percent,
the rotameter should be cleaned and recalibrated. No corrections
need be made for any calculations.
5.1.2 Barometer - The field barometer readings are acceptable if
they agree within 5 mm (0.2 in.) Hg when compared with those of
the mercury-in-glass barometer. When the comparison is not
within this range, the lesser calibration value should be used
for the calculations. If the field barometer reads lower than
the mercury-in-glass barometer, the field data are acceptable;
but if the mercury-in-glass barometer gives the lower reading,
the barometric value adjusted for the difference in the two
readings should be used in the calculation.
5.1.3 Balance - The balance should have been calibrated as
described in Subsection 4.3.1.
5.2 Analysis (Laboratory)
The purpose of Method 6B is to provide an average daily
emission rate for each 24-hour sample. These emission rates are
used for decision making and determining rolling average
compliance status. As a result, the values must be determined in
a timely manner. It is therefore assumed that the Method 6B
analyses are performed either on-site or within a reasonably
short distance from the site. Both the analytical equipment and
techniques lend themselves, when performed in a clean area by
skilled technicians, to providing the necessary accuracy. A base
laboratory is not required.
Calibrations and standardizations are of the utmost, impor-
tance to a precise and accurate analysis. The analysis is based
on the insolubility of barium sulfate (BaS04) and on the for-
mation of the colored complex between excess barium ions and the
thorin indicator, l-(o-arsonophenylazo)-2-naphthol-3, 6-disul-
fonic acid, disodium salt. Aliquots from the impinger solution
are analyzed by titration with barium perchlorate to the pink
endpoint. The barium ions react preferentially with sulfate ions
in solution to form a highly insoluble barium sulfate
precipitate. When the barium has reacted with all of the sulfate
ions, the excess barium then reacts with the thorin indicator to
form a metallic salt of the indicator and to give a color change
as shown in Equation 5-1.
Ba++ + SOA~ + thorin(x++) -> BaSO, + thorin(Ba ) Equation 5-1
(yellow) (pink)
Upon completion of each step of the standardization or of
each sample analysis, the data should be entered on the proper
-------
Section No. 3.13.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 4
data form. At the conclusion of the sample analysis, the data
form should be reviewed and signed by the laboratory person with
direct responsibility for the sample.
5.2.1 Reagents (Standardization and Analysis) - The following
reagents are required for the analysis of the samples:
Water - Deionized distilled water that conforms to ASTM
specification D1193-74, Type 3 is required. At the option of the
analyst, the KMnO. test for oxidizable organic matter may be
omitted when high concentrations of organic matter are not
expected. Note; The water must meet the ASTM specifications
since sulfate ions and many other anions present in distilled
water are not identified in the normal standardization of the
acid by NaOH titration, which measures the hydrogen ion concen-
tration rather than the sulfate ion concentration. This added
sulfate concentration will result in an erroneous standardization
of the barium perchlorate titration, which directly measures
sulfate ion concentration and not hydrogen ion concentration. A
check on the acceptability of the water is detailed in Subsection
5.13.4.
Isopropanol - 100 percent, ACS reagent grade is needed.
Check for peroxide impurities as described in Section 3.13.1
(Method 6A).
Thorin indicator - Dissolve 0.20 +0.002 g of l-(o-arsono-
phenylazo)-2-naphthol-3,6-disulfonic acid, disodium salt, or the
equivalent, in 100 ml of water. Measure the distilled water in
the 100-ml graduated cylinder (Class A).
Sulfuric acid standard, 0.0100N - Either purchase manufac-
turer-guaranteed or standardize the H2S04 to +0.002N against
0.0100N NaOH that has been standardized against potassium acid
phthalate (primary standard grade) as described in Subsection
5.13.3. The 0.01N H2S04 may be prepared in the following manner:
a. Prepare 0.5N H2S04 by adding approximately 1500 ml of
water to a 2-liter volumetric flask.
b. Cautiously add 28 ml of concentrated sulfuric acid and
mix.
c. Cool if necessary.
d. Dilute to 2-liters with water.
e. Prepare 0.01N H-SO. by first adding approximately 800 ml
of distilled water to a 1-liter volumetric flask and then
adding 20.0 ml of the 0.5N H0SO..
24
f. Dilute to 1-liter with water and mix thoroughly.
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 5
Barium perchlorate solution 0.0100N - Dissolve 1.95 g of
barium perchlorate trihydrate (Ba(C104)2.3H2O) in 200 ml of
water, and dilute to 1-liter with isopropanol. Alternatively,
1.22 g of barium chloride dihydrate (BaCl2.2H2O) may be used
instead of the perchlorate. Standardize, as in Subsection
5.13.4, with 0.0100N H2SO4. Note; Protect the 0.0100N barium
perchlorate solution from evaporation at all times by keeping the
bottle capped between uses.
Note; It is recommended that 0.1N sulfuric acid be pur-
chased. Pipette 10.0 ml of sulfuric acid (0.1N) into a 100-ml-
volumetric flask and dilute to volume with water that has been
determined to be acceptable as detailed in Subsection 5.13.4.
When the 0.0100N sulfuric acid is prepared in this manner,
procedures in Subsections 5.13.2. and 5.13.3 may be omitted since
the standardization of barium perchlorate will be validated with
the control sample.
5.2.2 Standardization of Sodium Hydroxide - To standardize NaOH,
proceed as follows:
1. Purchase a 50 percent w/w NaOH solution. Dilute 10 ml
to 1-liter with water. Dilute 52.4 ml of the diluted solution to
1-liter with water.
2. Dry the primary standard grade potassium acid phthalate
for 1 to 2 hours at 110 C (230 F), and cool in desiccator.
3. Weigh to the nearest 0.1 mg, three 40-mg portions of the
phthalate. Dissolve each portion in 100 ml of freshly boiled
water in a 250-ml Erlenmeyer flask.
4. Add two drops of phenolphthalein indicator, and titrate
the phthalate solutions with the NaOH solution. Observe titra-
tions against a white background to facilitate detection of the
pink endpoint. The endpoint is the first faint pink color that
persists for at least 30 seconds.
5. Compare the endpoint colors of the other two titrations
against the first.
6. Titrate a blank of 100 ml of freshly boiled distilled
water using the same technique as in step 4. (The normality is
the average of the three values calculated using the following
equation.)
_ mg KHP Equation 5-2
~
(ml Titrant - ml Blank) x (204.23)
-------
Section No. 3.13.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 6
where —-
NN QH = calculated normality of sodium hydroxide,
mg KHP = weight of the phthalate, mg,
ml Titrant = volume of sodium hydroxide titrant, and
ml Blank = volume of sodium hydroxide titrant for blank (ml).
The chemical reaction for this standardization is shown in
Equation 5-3. The sodium hydroxide is added to the potassium
hydrogen phthalate and colorless phenolphthalein solution until
there is an excess of diluted hydroxyl ions which causes the
phenolphthalein solution to change to a pink color.
Equation 5-3
NaOH + KHP + phenolphthalein -> KNaP + HOH + phenolphthalein
(colorless) (pink)
5.2.3 Standardization of Sulfuric Acid - To standardize sulfuric
acid, proceed as follows:
1. Pipette 25 ml of the H2S04 into each of three 250-ml
Erlenmeyer flasks.
2. Add 25 ml of water to each.
3. Add two drops of phenolphthalein indicator, and titrate
with the standardized NaOH solution to a persistent pink
endpoint, using a white background.
4. Titrate a blank of 25 ml of water, using the same tech-
nique as step 3. The normality will be the average of the three
independent values calculated using the following equation:
_ (ml NaOHacid - ml NaOHblank) X NNaOH Equation 5-4
w cr\ ~~ o ^
n**&\J * £*
-------
Section No. 3.13.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 7
1. Pipette 25 ml of sulfuric acid standard (0.0100N) into
each of three 250-ml Erlenmeyer flasks.
2. Add 100 ml of reagent grade isopropanol and two to four
drops of thorin indicator, and titrate to a pink endpoint using
0.0100 N barium perchlorate. Perform all thorin titrations
against a white background to facilitate the detection of the
pink endpoint color.
3. Prepare a blank by adding 100 ml of isopropanol to 25 ml
of water. If a blank requires >0.5 ml of titrant, the analyst
should determine the source of contamination. If the distilled
water contains high concentrations of sulfate of other polyvalent
anions, then all reagents made with the water will have to be
remade using distilled water that is acceptable.
4. Use the endpoint of the blank or the endpoint of the
first titration as a visual comparator for the succeeding
titrations.
5. Record data on analytical data form, Figure 5.2. The
normality of the barium perchlorate will be the average of the
three independent values calculated using Equation 5-5.
NH SQ x 25
NBa(C104)2 = Equation 5-5
(ml Ba(ClO4)2 - ml Blank)
where
N_ ,_-o « = calculated normality of barium perchlorate,
4 2
NIT or> = normality of standardized sulfuric acid,
H2S04
ml Ba(Cl04)2 = volume of barium perchlorate titrant, ml, and
ml Blank = volume of barium perchlorate titrant for blank, ml.
The chemical reaction for this standardization was shown in
Equation 5-1. The standardized barium perchlorate should be
protected from evaporation of the isopropanol at all times.
Note: It is suggested that the analyst unfamiliar with this
titration carry out titrations on aliquots at low, medium, and
high concentrations in the following manner:
1. Pipette 2.0-, 10.0-, and 20.0-ml aliquots of 0.0100N H2SO4
into three 250-ml Erlenmeyer flasks.
2. Dilute to 25 ml with distilled water.
-------
Plant /fc/Kl fbv>&r P)*>*r& Date
Sample location &/£r /Vy. 3 Analyst
Volume and normality of barium perchlorate
Standardization blank 0.0 ml (< 0.5 ml)
Section No. 3-13.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 8
N
I 2.4. TZ ml j
2 2.4-. SO ml t
3 Zfr.50 ml Q.QIOZO N
0-0102. N, avg
o
Sample
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Field
Blank
Sample
identification
number
AP-I
Total
sample
volume
•
ml
100
N/A
Sample
aliquot
volume
Volume for the blank must be the same as that of the sample aliquot.
b 1st titration
2nd titration
Signature of analyst
= 0.99 to 1.01 or 1st titration - 2nd titration £0.2 ml.
KoH K:
Signature of reviewer or supervisor \&fl/)l'//# ^ {£L/($\ (L>
J
Figure 5-2. Sulfur dioxide analytical data form.
O
-------
Section No. 3.13.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 9
3. Add a 100-ml volume of 100 percent isopropanol and two to
four drops of thorin indicator to each.
4. Titrate with barium perchlorate to become familiar with
the endpoint.
5.2.5 Control Samples - The accuracy and precision of the sample
analysis should be checked. The accuracy of the analytical tech-
nique is determined by control samples. The precision is checked
by duplicate analyses of both the control and the field samples.
Acceptable accuracy and precision should be demonstrated on the
analysis of the control sample prior to the analysis of the field
samples.
The control sample should be prepared and analyzed in the
following manner:
1. Dry the primary standard grade ammonium sulfate ((NH4)_S04)
for 1 to 2 hours at 110 C (230 F), and cool in a desiccator.
2. Weigh to the nearest 0.5 mg, 1.3214 g of primary standard
grade ammonium sulfate.
3. Dissolve the reagent in about 1800 ml of.distilled water in
a 2-liter volumetric flask.
4. Dilute to the 2-liter mark with distilled water. The
resulting solution is 0.0100N ammonium sulfate.
5. Enter all data on the form shown in Figure 5.3.
6. Pipette 25 ml of the control sample into each of three
250-ml Erlenmeyer flasks, and pipette a 25-ml blank of distilled
water into a fourth 250-ml Erlenmeyer flask. Note; Each control
sample will contain 16.5 mg of ammonium sulfate.
7. Add 100 ml of reagent grade isopropanol to each flask and
then two to four drops of thorin indicator.
8. Initially, titrate the blank to a faint pink endpoint using
the standardized barium perchlorate. The blank must contain
< 0.5 ml of titrant, or the water is unacceptable for use in this
method.
9. Titrate two of the control samples with the standardized
barium perchlorate to a faint pink endpoint using the blank
endpoint as a guide. The endpoint is the first faint pink
endpoint that persists for at least 30 seconds. All titrations
should be done against a white background.
-------
Section No. 3.13.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 10
o
Plant
Analyst /£«»•£; tirqn
Date analyzed
NT
'Ba(Cl04)2
Weight of ammonium sulfate is 1.3214 g?
Dissolved in 2 L of distilled water?
I
yes,
Titration of blank 0-0 ml Ba(C104)2 (must be <0.5 ml)
Control
sample
number
/
Time of
analysis,
24 h
0350
Titrant volume,3 ml
1st
2.S.O
2nd
2.^.0
3rd
Avg
2S.O
(
O
Two titrant volumes must agree within 0.2 ml.
(ml Ba(C10.)0 - ml Blank) x N_ , ~, n * ot- „. 0
42 Ba(ClO^)2 = 25 ml x 0
(control) (control
sample) sample)
ml -
mi)
O.
N =
(must agree within 5%, i.e., 0.238 to 0.262)
Does value agree? * yes no
Signature of analyst
Signature of reviewer
Figure 5.3. Control sample analytical data form.
O
-------
Section No. 3.13.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 11
10. If the titrant volumes from the first two control samples
agree within 0.2 ml, the average of the two values can be used to
complete the calculations shown in Figure 5.3. If not within 0.2
ml, titrate the third control sample. If the titration volume
agrees within 0.2 ml of either of the first two samples, use the
two titrant volumes that are consistent for the remaining
calculations. If this criterion cannot be met with the first set
of control samples, follow the same procedure on a second set of
two control samples.
11. If the criterion cannot be met for the second set of
control samples, the analyst should have the analytical tech-
niques observed by a person knowledgeable in chemical analysis,
or should have all reagents checked.
12. After consistent titrant volumes are obtained, calculate
the analytical accuracy as shown in Figure 5.3. If the measured
value is within 5 percent of the stated value, the technique and
standard reactions are acceptable, and the field samples may be
analyzed. When the 5 percent accuracy cannot be met, the barium
perchlorate must be restandardized or the control sample must be
checked until the accuracy criterion of the control sample
analysis can be obtained.
13. The recommended frequency for analysis of control
samples is the following:
a. Analyze two control samples each analysis day immediately
prior to analysis of the actual collected source samples.
b. Analyze two control samples after the last collected
source sample is analyzed each analysis day.
14. Enter results from the control sample analyses on Figure
5.3, and submit Figure 5.3 with the source test report as
documentation of the quality of the source test analysis.
5.2.6 Sample Analysis - Check the level of liquid in the con-
tainer to determine whether any sample was lost during shipment,
and note this on the data form, Figure 4.3. Figure 5.4 can be
used to check analytical procedures. If a noticeable amount of
leakage has occurred, follow the alternative method described
below. Approval should have been requested prior to testing in
case of subsequent leakage. The alternative method is as
follows:
1. Mark the new level of the sample.
2. Transfer the sample to a 100-ml volumetric (vsoln) flask,
and dilute to exactly 100 ml with deionized distilled wa?er.
-------
Section No. 3.13.5
Date July 1, 1986 /—x
Page 12 ( }
Reagents
Normality of sulfuric acid standard* 0- 010$ N
Date purchased /&//0/6f Date standardized /£>//£/gfT
Normality of barium perchlorate titrant* 0, ()6ef(t> 14 A/
Date standardized ?//£»/£ 5"!
Normality of control sample* Q. 6/OOd
Date prepared /^//& / &£~ :
Volume of burette ^OrH-O. Graduations &•/
Sample Preparation
Has liquid level noticeably changed?*
Original volume Corrected volume
Samples diluted to 100 ml?*
Analysis '
(Sulfur dioxide)
Volume of aliquot analyzed*
Do replicate titrant volumes agree within 1% or 0.2 ml? uc^> /"""N
Number and normality of control samples analyzed 2.$) Q. lOQfiJ \)
Are replicate control samples within 0.2 ml?
Is accuracy of control sample analysis +5%7*
Is the relative error of audit sample(s) within acceptable
limits?* U<£~5
7
(Moisture and carbon dioxide)
Balance calibrated with Class S weights to within 0.05 g?*
_
Initial weignt of each impinger to nearest 0.1 g*
Final weight of each impinger to nearest 0.1 g*
_
Initial weight of CO., absorber to nearest 0.1 g*
Final weight of CO.- absorber to nearest 0.1 g*
2
All data recorded? _ r _ Reviewed by
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
Figure 5.4. Posttest operations.
o
([
-------
Section No. 3.13.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 13
3. Put water in the sample storage container to the initial
sample mark, and measure the initial sample volume (V ).
som .
4. Put water in the sample storage container to the mark of
the transferred sample, and measure the final volume (V ).
SO J-ii *«
5. If vsoln is < Vsoln ' correct "fc*16 sample volume ,.. .
by using Equationf5-6, i soln
Vsoln - Vsoln 1 Equation 5-6
where
V ' = sample volume to be used for the calculations, ml,
V . = total volume of solution in which the sulfur diox-
ide is contained, ml,
Vsoln = initial sample volume placed in storage container,
ml , and
= final sample volume removed from storage container,
.C .
f ml .
6. Both the corrected and uncorrected values should be sub-
mitted in the test report to the Agency.
Proceed with the analysis as follows:
1. Transfer the contents of the sample bottle to a 100-ml
volumetric flask (V 1 ), and dilute to the mark with deionized
distilled water. SOJ-n
2. Pipette a 20-ml aliquot (V ) of this solution into a
250-ml Erlenmeyer flask, and add 80a ml of 100 percent isopro-
panol .
3. Add two to four drops of thorin indicator, and titrate to
an orange-pink endpoint using standardized 0.0100N barium per-
chlorate. Record the volume of barium perchlorate used in
titrating the sample (V4-)« If more than 100 ml of titrant is
required, then a smaller sample aliquot should be used (i.e.,
1.0 ml). If less than 5 ml of titrant is required, the analyst
may prepare the titrant with a normality of 0.0010 when a greater
precision is desired.
4. Repeat the above analysis on a new aliquot from the same
sample. Replicate titrant volumes must be within 1 percent or
0.2 ml, whichever is greater. If the titrant volumes do not meet
this criterion, repeat analyses on new aliquots of the sample
until two consecutive titrations agree within 1 percent or 0.2
ml, whichever is greater, or until sample is spent.
-------
Section No. 3.13.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 14
5. Record all data on the data form, Figure 5.2. Average
the consistent titrant volumes, and use them as V, in subse-
quent calculations. All analytical data must then be reviewed by
a person familiar with procedures, and this review should be
noted on the data form, Figure 5.2. Note: Protect the 0.0010N
barium perchlorate solution from evaporation at all times.
Warning; Contamination of the sample with Ascarite or
Drierite will cause bias. The analyst should take precautions
when handling Ascarite or Drierite and the field sample or
absorbing solution so as not to introduce these materials into
the sample or absorbing solution.
Note; References 2 and 3 contain additional information on
improved temperature stability and application of Method 6 to
high sulfur dioxide concentration.
O
o
-------
Section No. 3.13-5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 15
Table 5.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR POSTSAMPLING OPERATIONS
Activity
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Sampling
Apparatus
Dry gas meter
Within 5% of pretest
calibration factor
Make two independent
runs after each field
test
Recalibrate and
use calibration
factor that gives
lower sample
volume
Rate meter
Within 10* of desired
flow rate (recommended)
Make two independent
runs during the check
of the rate meter
Clean and
recalibrate
Meter thermom-
eter
Within 6°C (10.8°F)
at ambient temperature
Compare with ASTM
mercury-in-glass
thermometer after each
field test
Recalibrate and
and use higher
temperature value
for calculations
Barometer
Within 5.0 mm
(0.2 in.) Hg at
ambient pressure
Compare with mercury-
in-glass barometer
after each field test
Recalibrate and
use lower baro-
metric value for
calculations
Balance
Within 0.05 g
Compare against Class S
weights
Adjust, re-
pair, or re-
place
Analysis
Reagents
Prepare according to
requirements detailed
in Subsection 5-2
Prepare and/or stan-
dardize within 24 h of
sample analysis
Prepare new solu-
tions and/or re-
standardize
Control sample
Titrants differ by
£0.2 ml; analytical
results within 5% of
stated value
Before and after
analysis of field
samples
Prepare new solu-
tions and/or
restandardize
Sample
analysis
Titrant volumes differ
by <1% or <0.2 ml,
whichever is greater
Titrate until two or
more consecutive ali-
quots agree within 1%
or 0.2 ml, whichever is
greater, review all
analytical data
Void sample if
a set of two
titrations do
not meet
criterion
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.6
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
6.0 CALCULATIONS
Calculation errors due to procedural or mathematical mistakes
can be a part of total system error. Therefore, it is recom-
mended that each set of calculations be repeated or spotchecked,
preferably by a team member other than the one who performed the
original calculations. If a difference greater than typical
round-off error is detected, the calculations should be checked
step-by-step until the source of error is found and corrected. A
computer program is advantageous in reducing calculation errors.
If a standardized computer program is used, the original data
entry should be included in the printout to be checked; if
differences are observed, a new computer run should be made.
Table 6.1 at the end of this section summarizes the quality
assurance activities for calculations.
Calculations should be carried out to at least one extra
decimal figure beyond that of the acquired data and should be
rounded off after final calculation to two significant digits for
each run or sample. All rounding off of numbers should be
performed in accordance with the ASTM 380-76 procedures. All
calculations should then be recorded on a calculation form such
as the ones in Figures 6.2A and 6.2B, at the end of this section.
6.1 Nomenclature
The following nomenclature is used in the calculations:
'CO,
i *
'SO,
w
sso.
m
wi
m
wf
m
m
m
N
ai
af
SO,
= concentration of CX>2, dry basis, percent,
= concentration of sulfur dioxide, dry basis
corrected to standard conditions, mg/dscm (Ib/dscf),
= concentration of moisture, percent,
= emission rate of S02, lb SO2/million Btu (ng/J),
= volume of C02 liberated per million Btu of
heat release, dscm (dscf),
= initial mass of impingers, bubblers, and moisture
absorber, g,
= final mass of impingers, bubblers, and moisture
absorber, g,
= initial mass of C02 absorber, g,
= final mass of C02 absorber, g,
= mass of S02 collected, mg,
= normality of barium perchlorate titrant, milliequi-
valents/ml,
-------
Section No. 3.13.6
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2 /•— N
P. = barometeric pressure at the exit orifice of ^^
the dry gas meter, mm Hg (in. Hg),
TP- ""^
P , . = standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg),
T • = average dry gas meter absolute temperature, °K (°R),
Tstd = s'tandard absolute temperature, 293°K (528°R),
V_ = volume of sample aliquot titrated, ml,
3
VCO (std)= standard equivalent volume of C02 collected,
dry basis, m ,
V = dry gas volume measured by dry gas meter, dcm (dcf),
V , ..» = dry gas volume measured by dry gas meter, corrected to
standard conditions, dscm (dscf),
Vsoln = total volume of solution in which the sulfur
dioxide sample is contained, 100 ml,
V. = volume of barium perchiibfate titrant used for the
sample (average of replicate titrations), ml,
V. . = volume of barium perchlorate titrant used for the
blank, ml, /""N
V ..... = volume of water at standard conditions, dscm (dscf), > — s
Y = dry gas meter calibration factor, and
32.03 = equivalent weight of sulfur dioxide.
6.2 Calculations for Concentration
The following formulas for calculating the concentration of
sulfur dioxide, using metric units, are to be used along with the
example calculation forms shown in Figures 6.1, 6. 2A, and 6.2B.
6.2.1 CC^ Volume Collected, Corrected to Standard Conditions -
VC00(std) = 5'467 x 10~4 (maf - mai) Equation 6-1
6.2.2 Moisture Volume Collected,' Corrected to Standard Conditions -
Vr,/=+-^ = 1-336 x 10~° (m _ - m . ) Equation 6-2
W^ S^U / Wi WJL
o
-------
6.2.3 S02 Concentration
= 32'03
/ Vsoln \
(Vt - Vtb) N \ Va /
Vm(std) + VC02(std)
Section No. 3.13.6
Date July 1, 1986
Page 3
Equation 6-3
6.2.4 CO0 Concentration -
£* """ ' ----- .-....._--
'C02(std)
CC02 Vm(std) + VC02(std)
6.2.5 Moisture Concentration -
x 100
Equation 6-4
Cw = V
'H20(std)
m(std) + VH20(std) + VC02(std)
6.3 Emission Rate Calculations
Equation 6-5
If the only emission measurement desired is in terms of
emission rate of SO« (ng/J), an abbreviated procedure may be
used. The differences between Method 6A and the abbreviated
procedure are described in Subsection 4.3.
6.3.1
Mass Collected -
mso2 = 32'03 ^vt -
where
m.
= mass of S00 collected, mg.
Equation 6-6
6.3.2 Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rate -
where
mso
Ec- = F (1.829 x 109)- ^-——x
S02 c (maf ' mai)
Equation 6-7
Ec- = emission rate of S00, ng/J, and
oU/, ft
3
F = carbon F factor for the fuel burned, m /J,
c from Method 19.
-------
Section No. 3.13.6
Date July 1, 1986
Page 4
METER VOLUME (metric to English)
V = 33.^6 liter
m — — — — — • ,, Q
V = Vm (in liters) x 0.03531 ft^/liter = l_ . _/ 8 7_ 2^ ftJ
METER TEMPERATURE (metric to English)
m — — —
tm = [tm (°C) x 1.8] + 32 = _ J2- . 3 °F
T = t (°F) + 460 = ^"3 2_ . 3°R
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (metric to English)
pbar = 7f 2 . mm Hg
Pbar = Pbar ^mm Hg^ x °-03937 ln- H9/mm Hg = Z ^. - 8 O^ in. Hg
METER VOLUME (English to metric)
V = / . / 6 f 7- f t3
rn -' _ T - • _ _*_ - __
t3) x 0.02832 m3/ft3 = .O^S_ &&_ m3 (^\
METER TEMPERATURE (English to metric)
m m
tm = [tm (°F) - 32] x 5/9 = 2-_^. 4 °C
T = t (°C) + 273 = 2-f .T. °K
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (English to metric)
pbar = ^i ' £2- in' Hg
Pbar = Pbar (in* Hg) x 25*4 "^ Hg/±n- Hg = 1^2 •
Figure 6.1. Method 6A and 6B calculation form (conversion factors).
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.6
Date July 1, 1986
Page 5
STANDARD METER VOLUME (English units)
V
m
' 1 & ! 2: ft, Y = / . 0
21 - £ 0_ in. Hg, Tm = 53 £ . 3 °R
V (std) = 17.64 VY
m
m
bar
m
= _/ . 2 5" 7 6 dscf
CO,, VOLUME COLLECTED, STANDARD CONDITIONS
£
(English units)
maf = 3 £ 8 . 3 g, m = 3 £ £ . /_ g
(std) - 0.01930 (m . - in. ) = 0 • I £~G3 dscf
an ai — — — — —
Equation 6-1
C02 CONCENTRATION (percent by volume)
V
CO
'CO,
2(std)
x 100 = J{_ . )_~?_
Vm(std)
V co (std)
Q. ' £
SO2 CONCENTRATION (English units)
30 ml, Vtb * 0 . Q_b_ml, N = £ . 0 £ 2.2 (g-eq)/ml
Q . 0 ml. V = 2-0 . O ml
'SO,
= 7.061 x IP"5 (Vt - Vtb)N/Vsoln\ £ . £ 8 ^ £ x 10~4 Ib/dscf
std> + Vco2(std)
\ v
Equation 6-3
Figure 6.2A. Method 6A and 6B calculation form (English units)
-------
Section No. 3.13.6
Date July 1, 1986
Page 6
m
wf
MOISTURE CONCENTRATION (percent)
- 2rl± ' L 9
o
Vw(std) = °-04707 (mwf ~ mwi) = ' ^ ^ 2£ dscf Equation 6-2
c = __ VH20(std) _ x 100 = _ 6 • 8_ /_ %
H2° Vm(std) + VH00(std) + VC09(std)
£* jL
Equation 6-5
EMISSION RATE OF SO2 (English units)
(using meter volumes)
FC = _/0 /_0_ scf of C02/million Btu
E_n = C__ F 10° = 0 . Q (f £ lb S00/million Btu
oU— oU^ C — — — — — Z
° -• -
(not using meter sample volume)
mS°2
= L & LO. scf of C02/million Btu ( J
= 32.03 (Vt - Vtb)N /Vsoln\= _ L & • 44 m9 of S02 collected
a '
Equation 6-6
^
Ecn = F^ (1.141 x 10~ ) m__ = ^ . 465T lb S00/million Btu
ovJ* C ^ "jj o _ — — — — ^
(m
af maiJ
Equation 6-7
SO0 CONCENTRATION ( ppm )
C (ppm) = CS0 db/dscf) = / 7 Z . 6 ppm
---- ~
2
b°2 -7
1.663 x 10 X
Figure 6.2A. (continued)
O
-------
Section No. 3.13.6
Date July 1, 1986
Page 7
STANDARD METER VOLUME (metric units)
(using meter volumes)
vm = 3 2> • <£ # liter x 0.001 = O . Q ?> 3 (*£> m
lit ^™" ™~ ^~ ™"* ^™ ™^ ™"~~ ^™~ *~~ *^
m
Y = 1 - __? t L pbar = 2 _f Z • "^ «9' Tra _£rf C" • t °K
Vm(std) = 0.3858 VmY Pbar » . 03 _f _£_£ dscm
Tm
C02 VOLUME COLLECTED, STANDARD CONDITIONS
(metric units)
af ~" -?i_.__ * il 5» ' ai ~ — — — * —
—4
Vrn (std) = 5.467 x 10 (m - - m .) = . 0&4-4-& dscm
(_.u2 ar ai _____ j_ _
Equation 6-1
C02 CONCENTRATION (percent by volume)
c vco_5.
-------
Section No. 3.13.6
Date July 1, 1986
Page 8
MOISTURE CONCENTRATION (percent)
mwf = ££ 4. ' 2 9' mwi = Ml • J 9
Vm(std) " 1'336 x 10"3 (mwf - mwi> " • -?* 2-2t dscm
Equation 6-2
o
cu ft = _ H,Q _ : _ x 100 =
9U V + V 4-V
z vm(std) vH20(std) vCO2(std)
Equation 6-5
EMISSION RATE OF S02 (metric units)
(using meter volumes)
F = 0 . £ & ^ x 10~ dscm of C02/J
Eso2 « Cso2 Fc -^-- -1 $$ • 2 ng/J O
Cco2
(not using meter volumes)
?c = P • ^ ^ 4 x 10~ dscm of C02/J
n»0ft » 32.03 (V. - V.. ) N/Vsoln\° /& . O Z. mg of S00 collected
so2 t: to 1 y—| — -t- — — — ^
/vsoln\'
\ Vn /
Equation 6-6
ESQ = Fc (1.829 x 109) mSQ =__/!£• 3 ng/J
2 2
Equation 6-7
Figure 6.2B. (continued) ^^^
-------
Section No. 3.13.6
Date July 1, 1986
Page 9
Table 6.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR CALCULATION CHECKS
Characteristics
Analysis data
form
Calculations
Acceptance limits
All data and calcula-
tions are shown
Difference between
check and original
calculations should
not exceed round-off
error
Frequency and method
of measurement
Visually check
Repeat all calculations
starting with raw data
for hand calculations;
check all raw data in-
put for computer calcu-
lations; hand calculate
one sample per test
Action if
requirements
are not met
Complete the
missing data
values
Indicate errors
on sulfur dioxide
calculation form.
Fig. 6.1A or 6.IB
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.7
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
7.0 MAINTENANCE
The normal use of emission-testing equipment subjects it to
corrosive gases, extremes in temperature, vibration, and shock.
Keeping the equipment in good operating order over an extended
period of time requires knowledge of the equipment and a program
of routine maintenance which is performed quarterly or after 2830
liters (100 ft ) of operation, whichever comes first. In
addition to the quarterly maintenance, a yearly cleaning of the
entire meter box is recommended. Maintenance procedures for the
various components are summarized in Table 7.1 at the end of the
section. The following procedures are not required, but are
recommended to increase the reliability of the equipment.
7.1 Pump
In the present commercial sampling train, several types of
pumps are used; the most common are the fiber vane pump with
in-line oiler and the diaphragm pump. The fiber vane pump re-
quires a periodic check of the oiler jar. Its contents should be
translucent; the oil should be changed if it is not translucent.
Use the oil specified by the manufacturer. If none is specified,
use SAE-10 nondetergent oil. Whenever the fiber vane pump starts
to run erratically or during the yearly disassembly, the head
should be removed and the fiber vanes changed. Erratic operation
of the diaphragm pump is normally due to either a bad diaphragm
(causing leakage) or to malfunctions of the valves, which should
be cleaned annually by complete disassembly.
7.2 Dry Gas Meter
The dry gas meter should be checked for excess oil or corro-
sion of the components by removing the top plate every 3 months.
The meter should be disassembled and all components cleaned and
checked whenever the rotation of the dials is erratic, whenever
the meter will not calibrate properly over the required flow rate
range, and during the yearly maintenance.
7.3 Rotameter
The rotameter should be disassembled and cleaned according to
the manufacturer's instructions using only recommended cleaning
fluids every 3 months or upon erratic operation.
7.4 Sampling Train
All remaining sample train components should be visually
checked every 3 months and completely disassembled and cleaned or
replaced yearly. Many items, such as quick disconnects, should
be replaced whenever damaged rather than checked periodically.
Normally, the best procedure for maintenance in the field is to
-------
Section No. 3.13.7
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
use another entire unit such as a meter box, sample box, or
umbilical cord (the hose that connects the sample box and meter
box) rather than replacing individual components.
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.13-7
Date July 1, 1986
Page 3
Table 7.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CHECKS
Apparatus
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Routine main-
tenance
No erratic behavior
Routine maintenance
performed quarterly
or after-2830 liters
(100 ft J) of opera-
tion; disassemble and
clean yearly
Replace parts
as needed
Fiber vane
pump
In-line oiler free
of leaks
Periodically check oil-
er jar; remove head
and change fiber vanes
Replace as
needed
Diaphragm
pump
Leak-free valves func-
tioning properly
Clean valves during
yearly disassembly
Replace when
leaking or mal-
functioning
Dry gas
meter
No excess oil, corro-
sion, or erratic rota-
tion of the dial
Check every 3 mo. for
excess oil or corrosion
by removing the top
plate; check valves and
diaphragm yearly and
whenever meter dial runs
erratically or whenever
meter will not calibrate
Replace parts as
as needed or re-
place meter
Rotameter
Clean and no erratic
behavior
Clean every 3 no. or
whenever ball does not
move freely
Replace
Sampling
train
No damage
Visually check every
3 mo; completely dis-
assemble and clean or
replace yearly
If failure
noted, use
another entire
meter box, sam-
ple box, or
umbilical cord
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.8
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
8.0 AUDITING PROCEDURE
An audit is an independent assessment of data quality. In-
dependence is achieved if the individual(s) performing the audit
and their standards and equipment are different from the regular
field crew and their standards and equipment. Routine quality
assurance checks by a field team are necessary in generation of
good quality data, but they are not part of the auditing proce-
dure. Table 8.1 at the end of this section summarizes the qual-
ity assurance functions for auditing.
fi 7
Based on the results of performance audits ' and
collaborative tests of Method 6, two specific performance audits
are recommended:
1. Audit of the analytical phase of Method 6A, or an audit
of the sampling and analytical phase for Method 6B.
2. Audit of data processing for both Methods.
It is suggested that a systems audit be conducted as specified by
the quality assurance coordinator, in addition to these perform-
ance audits. The two performance audits and the systems audit
are described in detail in Subsections 8.1 and 8.2, respectively.
8.1 Performance Audits
Performance audits are made to evaluate quantitatively the
quality of data produced by the total measurement system (sample
collection, sample analysis, and data processing). It is recom-
mended that these audits be performed by the responsible control
agency once during every enforcement source test. A source test
for enforcement comprises a series of runs at one source. The
performance audit of the analytical phase is subdivided into two
steps: (1) a pretest audit which is optional, and (2) an audit
during the field sampling and/or analysis phase which is
required.
8.1.1 Pretest Audit of Analytical Phase Using Aqueous Ammonium
Sulfate (Optional) - The pretest audit described in this section
can be used to determine the proficiency of the analyst and the
standardization of solutions in the Method 6A or 6B analysis and
should be performed at the discretion of the agency auditor. The
analytical phase of Method 6A or 6B can be audited with the use
of aqueous ammonium sulfate samples provided to the testing
laboratory before the enforcement source test. Aqueous ammonium
sulfate samples may be prepared by the procedure described in
Subsection 3.13.5 on control sample preparation.
The pretest audit provides the opportunity for the testing
laboratory to check the accuracy of its analytical procedure.
This audit is especially recommended for a laboratory with little
-------
Section No. 3.13.8
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
or no experience with the Method 6A or 6B analysis procedure
described in this Handbook.
The testing laboratory should provide the agency/organiza-
tion requesting the performance test with a notification of the
intent to test 30 days prior to the enforcement source test. The
testing laboratory should also request that the agency/organi-
zation provide the following performance audit samples: two
samples at a low concentration (500 to 1000 mg SO^/dsm of gas
sampled or approximately 10 to 20 mg of ammonium sulfate per
sample)3and two samples at a high concentration (1500 to 2500 mg
S02/dsm of gas sampled or about 30 to 50 mg of ammonium sulfate
per sample). This is based on an emission standard of 1.2 Ib of
S02 per million Btu which would be about 1300 mg S02/dsm at 35
percent excess air. At least 10 days prior to the enforcement
source test, the agency/organization should provide the four
audit samples. The concentration of the two low and the two high
audit samples should not be identical.
The testing laboratory will analyze one sample at the low
concentration and one at the high concentration, and submit their
results to the agency/organization prior to the enforcement
source test. (Note: The analyst performing this optional audit
must be the same analyst audited during the field sample analysis
described in Subsection 8.1.2).
The agency/organization determines the relative error (RE)
between the measured SO2 concentration and the audit or known
values of concentration. The RE is a measure of the bias of the
analytical phase of Method 6A or 6B. Calculate RE using Equation
8-1.
RE - Cd " Ca x 100 Equation 8-1
Ca
where
3
C, = Determined audit sample concentration mg S02/dsm , and
3
C = Actual audit concentration, mg S00/dsm .
3 £t
The recommended control limit- for the pretest audit is ^5
percent for both audit samples.
If the results of the pretest audit exceed 5 percent, the
agency/organization should have the tester/analyst check the
analytical system and repeat the audit sample analysis using a
second aliquot of the same audit sample. After taking any
necessary corrective action, the testing laboratory should then
analyze the same audit samples and report the results immediately
to the agency/organization before the enforcement source test
analysis.
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.8
Date July 1, 1986
Page 3
8.1.2 Audit of Analytical Phase Using Aqueous Ammonium Sulfate
for Method 6A - The audit described here is exactly the same
audit promulgated as part of Method 6 in the Federal Register,
Vol. 49, June 27, 1984. The agency responsible for the enforce-
ment source test should obtain the audit samples from the EPA
Quality Assurance Coordinator in the respective EPA Regional
Office.
The agency should provide the tester with two audit samples
to be analyzed at the same time as the field samples from the
enforcement source test. The purpose of this audit is to assess
the data quality at the time of the analysis. The relative error
(RE) for the audit samples results are determined using Equation
8-1. The results of the calculated RE should be included in the
enforcement source test report as an assessment of accuracy of
the analytical phase of Method 6A during the actual enforcement
source test.
The two audit samples should be analyzed concurrently with
and in the same manner as the set of compliance samples to
evaluate the technique of the analyst and the preparation of the
standards. The same analyst, analytical reagents, and analytical
system must be used for both the compliance samples and the EPA
audit samples; if this condition is met, auditing of subsequent
compliance analyses within 30 days for the same enforcement
agency may not be required. An audit sample set may not be used
to validate different sets of compliance samples under the
jurisdiction of different enforcement agencies unless prior
arrangements are made with both enforcement agencies.
3
Calculate the concentrations in mg/dsm using the specified
sample volume in the audit instructions. (Note: Indication of
acceptable results may be obtained immediately by reporting by
telephone to the responsible enforcement agency the audit results
in mg/dsm and compliance results in total mg SO2/sample.)
Include the results of both gudit samples, their identification
numbers, and the analyst's name with the results of the
compliance determination samples in appropriate reports to the
EPA Regional Office or the appropriate enforcement agency.
Include this information tfith subsequent compliance analyses for
the same enforcement agency during the 30-day period.
The concentration of the audit samples obtained by the
analyst shall agree within 5 percent of the actual concentra-
tions. If the 5 percent specification is not met, reanalyze the
compliance samples and audit samples, and include initial and
reanalysis values in tha test report.
failure to meet tie 5 percent specification may, result in
rotests until the audit problems are resolved. However, if the
audit results do not affect the compliance or noncompiiance stat-
us of the affected facility, the Administrator may waive the
-------
Section No. 3.13.8
Date July 1, 1986
Page 4
reanalysis requirement, further -audits, or retests and accept the ^J
results of the compliance test. While steps are being taken to
resolve audit analysis problems^ the Administrator may also
choose to use the data to determine the compliance or noncom-
pliance status of the affected facility.
Note: It is recommended that known quality control samples
be analyzed prior to the compliance and audit sample analysis to
optimize the system accuracy and precision. One source of these
samples is:
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Monitoring and Systems Laboratory
Quality Assurance Division (MD-77A)
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Attention: Source Test Audit Coordinator
8.1.3 Audit of Sampling and Analytical Phase for Method 6B -
When Method 6B is used to demonstrate compliance with a 30-day
rolling average standard (e.g., 40 CFR 60, Subpart Da), the
following audits should be conducted:
Cylinder Gas Audit (CGA) - During the first 7 days of con-
tinous use of Method 6B at the same source, a CGA should be
conducted. Thereafter, a CGA should be conducted once every X""*\
calendar quarter that Method 6B is used at the same source. The ( )
purpose of the CGA is to measure the RE for the S02 and C02 —
sampling and analyses. The RE should be within 15 percent. The
testers must obtain an audit gas in an aluminum cylinder that
meets the requirements of EPA Protocol No. 1 (Section 3.0.4 of
this Handbook) and contains SO2 in the range of 200 to 400 ppm
and C02 in the range of 12 percent to 16 percent, with the
balance of the gas as N2. In addition, the tester must specify
that the gas manufacturer (1) blends moisture-free carbon dioxide
with the sulfur dioxide and (2) does not use a UV fluorescent
analyzer to determine the SO,, concentration in the cylinder,
since a UV fluorescence SO9 signal is quenched by the presence of
co2.8
g
In a study conducted by EPA, audit cylinders containing
sulfur dioxide (200 to 400 ppm) and carbon dioxide (12 to 16
percent) were purchased from nine different commercial gas
manufacturers. All nine cylinders ordered were to be prepared
according to EPA Protocol No. 1. The purpose of this study was
to determine whether accurate mixtures of S02 and C02 could be
expected from commercial gas manufacturers following EPA Protocol
No. 1 and to determine if these mixtures were stable. The
accuracy for C02 was within 1.2 percent for all nine cylinders.
The accuracy for SO,, was within 5.2 percent for seven cylinders
and within 9.8 percent for the remaining two cylinders. The
sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide concentrations were were found
to be stable over the entire period of the study (473 days). In
another study conducted by EPA, three cylinders containing a
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.8
Date July 1, 1986
Page 5
nominal 250 ppm S02 and 10 percent COu showed the S02 to be
stable over the entire periocLof the study (22 months). Finally,
in a study conducted by EPA, cylinder gases of nominal 250 ppm
S0~ and 10 percent C02 were used to audit three contractors using
Method 6B. These audits demonstrated that cylinder gases are an
effective means to assess the accuracy of Method 6B.
To conduct the CGA using the Protocol No. 1 gases, the
following procedures should be followed:
1. Attach the audit gas cylinder as shown in Figure 8.1.
2. Open the audit cylinder until 2 times the sample flow
rate is-^obtained on the discharge rotameter. This would be
approximately 2.0 L/min for the intermittent sampling train, and
approximately 60 ml/min for the continuous sampling train. Allow
the audit gas to flow through the manifold for 5 minutes to
condition the manifold.
3. Start the Method 6B sampling train, and adjust to de-
sired rate. The audit sample will be collected at a continuous
sampling rate for both the continuous and intermittent sampling
train. This is done in an effort to minimize the use of the
audit gas. The intermittent sampling train should be operated
for 30 minutes. The continuous train should be operated for 24
hours.
4. The sampling train should be set at the proper sampling
rate for the train; the audit gas flow rate should then be ad-
justed so that the discharge rotameter is reading at about equal
to the sampling rate. This will ensure that the audit gas is
collected properly from the glass manifold.
5. At the completion of the run, shut off the sampling
train, then shut off the audit gas flow.
6. The audit sample should be recovered and analyzed in
the same manner as the field samples.
7. Calculate Ib SO2/million Btu for the Method 6B sampling
train (CMgB) using Equation 8.2.
CM6B = 1-141 x 10 c -r-2 = Ib S00/million Btu
Equation 8-2
where
C..-,, = Concentration measured by Method 6B, Ib SO0/
M6B million Btu, 2
-------
REGULATOR
S02
&
C02
in
No
O
" MALE/FEMALE GLASS JOINT
1/8" TEFLON
GLASS MANIFOLD
y
METHOD 6B
PROBE
TO METHOD 6B
SAMPLE TRAIN
V MALE/
FEMALE GLASd
JOINT
d
V TEFLON
EXCESS TO
ATMOSPHERE
H202 BUBBLER
ROTAMETER
Figure 8.1. Cylinder Gas Audit of Method 6B.
O
TJ o en
cu o o>
•
w
CD U>
O
oo
-------
Section No. 3.13.8
Date July 1, 1986
Page 7
F = F factor (use the actual F factor or assume
F of 1800 for both calculations), scf of
C02/million Btu,
MSO = Mass of S02 per total sample analyzed, mg of SO-, and
M
CO = Mass of C02 per total sample analyzed, g of C02
8. Calculate Ib S02/million Btu for the audit gas (C )
using Equation 8-3. a
7 Equation 8-3
Ca = 1.66 x 10" ' S02 FC 100
ppm' % C02
where
C = Concentration in audit cylinder, Ib S00/million
a Btu, 2
S02 = Concentration of S02 in audit cylinder, ppm,
ppm
% C02 = Concentration of C02 in audit cylinder, %, and
F^ = F factor (same as above), scf of C00/million Btu.
C Z
9. The auditor should then calculate the RE using Equation
8-4.
RE = CM6B " °a x 100 Equation 8-4
Ca
10. The RE should be within 15 percent. The results of the
audit should be included in the report as an audit of the
accuracy of the sampling and analysis phase of Method 6B.
S02 Analysis - During the first 7 days of continuous use of
Method 6B at the same source, an S02 analysis audit should be
performed. Thereafter, an S02 analysis audit should be conducted
once every 30 days that Methoa 6B is used at the same source.
The purpose of this audit is to measure the RE for SCw analysis.
The RE should be within 5 percent. The audit samples described
in Section 8.1.3 should be used. The CGA and the S02 analysis
should be conducted on the same day.
8.1.4 Audit of Data Processing - Data processing errors can be
determined by auditing the data recorded on the field and labor-
atory forms. The original and audit (check) calculation should
agree within roundoff error; if not, all of the remaining data
should be checked. The data processing may also be audited by
-------
Section No. 3.13.8
Date July 1, 1986
Page 8
providing the testing laboratory with specific data sets (exactly ( }
as would appear in the field), and by requesting that the data V /
calculation be completed and that the results be returned to the
agency/organization. This audit is useful in checking both
computer programs and manual methods of data processing.
8.2 Systems Audit
A systems audit is an on-site qualitative inspection and
review of the total measurement system (sample collection, sample
analysis, data processing, etc.). Initially, a systems audit is
recommended for each enforcement source test, defined here as a
series of three runs at one source. After the test team gains
experience with the method, the frequency of auditing may be re-
duced—once for every four tests.
The auditor should have extensive background experience in
source sampling, specifically with the measurement system being
audited. The functions of the auditor are summarized below:
1. Inform the testing team of the results of pretest aud-
its, specifying any area(s) that need special attention or
improvement.
2. Observe procedures and techniques of the field team
during sample collection.
3. Check/verify records of apparatus calibration checks
and quality control used in the laboratory analysis of control
samples from previous source tests, where applicable.
4. Record the results of the audit, and forward them with
comments to the test team management so that appropriate correc-
tive action may be initiated.
While on site, the auditor observes the source test team's over-
all performance, including the following specific operations:
1. Setting up and leak testing the sampling train.
2. Preparing and adding the absorbing solution to the
impingers.
3. Checking for constant rate sampling (for Method 6A
only).
4. Purging the sampling train (for Method 6A only).
Figure 8.2 is a suggested checklist for the auditor.
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.8
Date July 1, 1986
Page 9
Yes
y
/
s
/
y
if
tf
y
/
y
y
/
/
i/
\/
T /7Xd
C*c
No
>tyst
>Uj£>
Comment
#•
i\S O-r~
Presampling Preparation
1. Knowledge of process conditions
2. Calibration of pertinent equipment, in particular, the
dry gas meter, prior to each field test
On-Site Measurements
3. Leak testing of sampling train after sample run
4 . Preparation and addition of absorbing solutions to
impingers
5. Constant rate sampling (for Method 6A only)
6. Purging of the sampling train and rinsing of the
impingers and connecting tubes to recover the sample (for
Method 6A only) *>~~ •» . ..
7- Recording of pertinent process conditions during sample
collection
8. Maintaining the probe at a given temperature
Postsampling
9- Control sample analysis — accuracy and precision
10. Sample aliquoting techniques
11. Titration technique, particularly endpoint precision
12. Use of detection blanks in correcting field sample
results
13. Weighing of the CO-" absorbent
14. Calculation procedure/check
15. Calibration checks
16. Standardized barium perchlorate solution
17. Result of the audit sample
General Comments
/^/f &uc(ii- S'£*y>U£ t/J&t*e. $i*c-cc£S'ri>ti ^10*14 t*>irt
r *^Tr •
w
Figure 8.2. Method 6A and 6B checklist to be used by auditors.
-------
Section No. 3.13-8
Date July 1, 1986
Page 10
Table 8.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR AUDITING PROCEDURE
O
Audit
Analytical
phase using
aqueous ammon-
ium sulfate
(Method 6A)
Acceptance limits
Measured RE of the
pretest audit sample
should be less than
+5% of given value
"(optional); RE for
audit during test +5
(mandatory)
Frequency and method
of measurement
Frequency; Once during
every enforcement source
test
Method; Analyze audit
samples and compare
with given values
Action if
requirements
are not met
Review operat-
ing technique
and repeat audit
and field sample
analysis
Analytical
phase using
aqueous ammon-
ium sulfate
(Method 6B)
Measured RE of the
pretest audit sample
should be less than
+5# of given value
"(optional)
Frequency; Once prior to
setting up a new system
Method; Measure audit
samples and compare with
given value
Review operat-
ing technique
and repeat audit
sample analysis
Sampling and
analytical
phase using
cylinder gas
audit and
aqueous am-
monium sul-
fate (contin-
uous use of
Method 6B)
Measured RE of the
cylinder gas audit
should be less than
(mandatory)
Measured RE of the
aqueous audit samples
should be less than
+5# (mandatory)
Frequency; Within'the
first 7 days of initial
use and every 30 days
thereafter during
continued use
Method; Perform cylinder
gas audit and compare
with given value
'Frequency; Same as above
and on the same day as
the cylinder gas audit
Method; Perform audit
sample analysis and
compare with given value
Review operat-
ing technique
and repeat audit
O
Same as above
CQA
Data processing
errors
The original and
check calculations
within round-off
error
Frequency; Once during
every enforcement source
test
Method; Independent
calculations, starting
with recorded data
Check and correct
all data for the
source test
(continued)
O
-------
Section No. 3.13-8
Date July 1, 1986
Page 11
Table 8.1 (continued)
Audit
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
System audit
Operation technique
described in this
section of the Hand-
book
Frequency; Once during
every enforcement test
until experience gained,
then every fourth test
Method; Observation of
techniques, assisted by
audit checklist,
Fig. 8.2
Explain to team
the deviations
from recommended
techniques; note
on Fig. 8.2
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.9
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
9.0 RECOMMENDED STANDARDS FOR ESTABLISHING TRACEABILITY
To achieve data of desired quality, two considerations are
essential: the measurement process must be in a state of statis-
tical control at the time of the measurement, and the systematic
errors, when combined with the random variation (errors of meas-
urement), must result in an acceptable uncertainty. To ensure
good quality data, it is necessary to perform quality control
checks and independent audits of the measurement process; to
document these data by means of a quality control chart as appro-
priate; and to use materials, instruments, and measurement
procedures that can be traced to an appropriate standard of
reference.
Data must be routinely obtained by replicate measurements of
control standard samples and working standards. The working
calibration standards should be traceable to standards that are
considered primary, such as those listed below.
1. Dry gas meter must be calibrated against a wet test
meter that has been verified by an independent liquid displace-
ment method (Section 3.13.2) or by use of a spirometer.
2. The barium perchlorate is standardized against sulfuric
acid. The sulfuric acid should have been standardized with pri-
mary standard grade potassium acid phthalate. The standardized
barium perchlorate should then be validated with an aqueous
solution of primary standard grade ammonium sulfate. This makes
the titrant solution traceable to two primary standard grade
reagents.
3. The audit of Method 6B is conducted with a cylinder gas
that is traceable to an NBS gas Standard Reference Material
(SRM) or an NBS/EPA approved gas Certified Reference Material
(CRM) with the use of EPA Protocol No. 1.
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section 3.13.10
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
10.0 REFERENCE METHODS*
MtTHOB 6A—DrmiWIKATIOW Of SUITTJK Dl-
oxicz. MOISTDM. Ain> CAMOH DIOXISI
EMISSIONS FROM FOSSIL Fan. COMBUSTION
Sonnets
1. Applicability and Principle
1.1 Applicability. This method applies to
the determination of sulfur dioxide
emissions from fossil fuel combustion
sources in terms of concentration (mg/m')
and in terms of emission rate (ng/J) and to
the determination of carbon dioxide (CO.)
concentration (percent). Moisture. If de-
sired, may also be determined by this
method.
The minimum detectable limit, the upper
limit, and the Interferences of the method
for the measurement of SOt are the same as
for Method 6. For a 20-liter sample, the
method hu a precision of 0.5 percent CO,
for concentrations between 2.5 and 25 per-
cent CO, and 1.0 percent moisture for mois-
ture concentrations greater than 5 percent.
1.2 Principle. The principle of sample
collection is the same as for Method 6
except that moisture and CO, are collected
In addition to SO, in the came sampling
train. Moisture and CO, fractions are deter-
mined gravimetrically.
2. Apparatus
2.1 Sampling. The sampling train is
shown in Figure OA-l: the equipment re-
quired Is the same as for Method 6. Section
2.1. except as specified below:
2.1.1 SO, Absorbers. Two 30-ml midget
impingers with a 1-mm restricted tip and
two 30-ml midget bubblers with an unre-
stricted tip. Other types of impingers and
bubblers, such as Mae West for SO, collec-
tion and rigid cylinders for moisture absorb-
ers containing Drierite. may be used with
proper attention to reagent volumes and
levels, subject to the Administrator's ap-
proval.
2.1.3 CO. Absorber. A scalable rigid cylin-
der or bottle with an inside diameter be-
tween 30 and 90 mm and a length between
125 and 250 mm and with appropriate con-
nections at both ends.
NOTE For applications downstream of wet
scrubbers, a heated out-of-stacx filter
(either boroslllcate glass wool or glass fiber
mat) is necessary. The filter may be a sepa-
rate heated unit or may be within the
heated portion of the probe. If the filter is
within the sampling probe, the filter should
not be within IS cm of the probe inlet or
any unheated section of the probe, such as
the connection to the first SO, absorber.
The probe and filter should be heated to at
least 20* C above the source temperature.
but not greater than ISO* C. The filter tem-
perature (i.e.. the sample gas temperature)
should be monitored to assure the desired
temperature is maintained. A heated Teflon
connector may be used to connect the filter
holder or probe to the first impincer.
NOTE Mention of a brand name does not
constitute endorsement by the Environmen-
tal Protection Agency.
2.2 Sample Recovery and Analysis. The
equipment needed for sample recovery and
analysis is the same as required for Method
6. In addition, a balance to measure within
0.05 g is needed for analysis.
J. ReagenU
Unless otherwise indicated, all reagents
must conform to the specifications estab-
lished by the committee on analytical rea-
gents of the American Chemical Society.
Where such specifications are not available.
use the best available grade.
3.1 Sampling. The reagents required for
sampling are the same as specified In
Method 6. In addition, the following ret-
cents are required:
3.1.1 Drtertte. Anhydrous calcium sulfate
(CaSO.) deslccant. 8 mesh, indicating type Is
recommended. (Do not use silica gel or simi-
lar deslccant in the application.)
3.1.2 CO, Absorbing Material. Accarite II.
Sodium hydroxide coated slllcsw 8 to 20
mesh.
3.2 Sample Recovery tnd Analysis. The
reagents needed for sample recovery and
analysts are the same as for Method 6. Sec-
tions 3.2 and 3.3. respectively.
4. Procedure
4.1 Sampling.
4.1.1 Preparation of Collection Train.
Measure 15 ml of 80 percent tsopropanol
into the first midget bubbler and 15 ml of 3
percent hydrocen peroxide into each of the
first two midget implnsers as described in
Method e. Insert the glacs wool into the top
of the tsopropanol bubbler as shown in
Figure 6A-1. Into the fourth vessel in the
train, the second midget bubbler, place
about 25 g of Drierite. Clean the outsidea of
the bubblers and impingers. and weigh at
room temperature (-20' C) to the nearest
.0.1 f. Welgn the four vessels simultaneous-
ly, and record tola I""'"1 man
With one end of the CO, absorber sealed.
place gl&ra wool in the cylinder to a depth
of about 1 cm. Place about 150 g of CO. ab-
sorbing material in the cylinder on top of
the glass wool, and fill the remaining space
In the cylinder with rl*" wool. Assemble
the cylinder as shown in Figure 6A-2. With
the cylinder In a horizontal position, rotate
It around the horizontal axis. The CO, ab-
sorelns mitrl*1 should remain in position
durtns the rotation, and no open spaces or
should be formed. If necessary.
more glscs wool Into tht cylinder to
the CO. absorbing material stable.
Clean the outdde of the cylinder of locee
* Federal Register, Volume 47,
Volume 49, No. 51, March 14,
No. 231, December 1, 1982 and
1984.
-------
Section 3.13.10
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
dirt and moisture and weigh at room tem-
perature to the nearest 0.1 g. Record this
Initial mats.
Assemble the train as shown In Figure 6A-
1. Adjust the probe heater to a temperature
sufficient to prevent condensation isae Note
In paragraph 2.1.1). Place crushed Ice and
water around the Lmplniers and bubblers.
Mount the COt absorber outside the crater
bath In a vertical now position with the
sample gas Inlet at the bottom. Flexible
tubing, e.g.. Tygon. may be used to connect
the last SO, absorbing bubbler to the Drier-
it* absorber and to connect the Orierite ab-
corber to the CO, absorber. A second, small-
er COt absorber containing Asc&rite n may
be added In lln« downstream of the primary
COt absorber as a breakthrough Indicator.
Ascartte n turns white when CO. Is ab-
sorbed.
4.1.2 Leak-Check Procedure and Sample
Collection. The leak-check procedure and
sample collection procedure are the tame as '
specified in Method 0. Sections 4.1.2 and
4.1.3. respectively.
4.2. Sample Recovery.
4.2.1 Moisture Measurement. Disconnect
the isopropanol bubbler, the SCs Impinser*.
and the moisture ateorber from the cample
train. Allow about 10 minutes for them to
reach room temperature, clean the outsidea
of loess dirt and moisture, and weigh them
simultaneously In the came manner as In
Section 4.1.1. Record this final r«tr*-
4.2.2 Peroxide Solution. Discard the con-
tents of the Isoproponol bubbler and pour
the contents of the mldset tmplneers Into a
leak-free polyethylene bottle for shipping.
Hints the two midzet tmpingers and con-
necting tubes with delonlzed distilled water.
and add the washings to the same storage
container.
4.2.3 CO, Absorber. Allow the CO, ab-
sorber to warm to room temperature (about
10 minutes), clean the outside of loose dirt
and moisture, and weigh to the nearest 0.1 e
in the same manner as in Section 4.1.1.
Record this final macs. Discard used Ascar-
Ite II material.
4.3 Sample Analysis. The sample analjnds
procedure for SO, U the came as specified In
Method 6. Section 4J.
5. Calibration
The calibrations and checks are the came
u required in Method 6. Section S.
.... o
Figure 6A-1. Sampling train.
O
Figure 6A-2. C02 abjorbor.
O
-------
Section 3.13.10
Date July 1, 1986
Page 3
6. Calculations
Carry out calculations, retaining at least
one extra decimal figure beyond that of the
acquired data. Round off figures after final
calculations. The calculations, nomencla-
ture, and procedures are the same as speci-
fied In Method 6 with the addition of the
following:
6.1 Nomenclature.
C.- Concentration of moisture, percent.
CCM« Concentration of CO,, dry basis, per-
cent.
M^« Initial mass of tmplnger*. bubblers.
and moisture absorber, g.
m^-Final maes of implnsen. bubblers, and
moisture absorber, g.
m* - Initial mass of COi absorber, g.
m*-Final "«»« of COi absorber, e.
Vern^o-Equivalent volume of CO. collected
at standard conditions, dam'.
VwMioEquivalent volume of moisture col-
lected at standard conditions. OB'.
5.467x10-••Equivalent volume of gaseous
CO, at standard conditions per gram. smV
K.
1.336xlO-*-Equlvalent volume of water
vapor at standard conditions per gram.
sm'/g.
6.2 COi Volume Collected. Corrected to
Standard Conditions.
Vcwta»» - 5-467 x 1C"4 (m*- m*) (Eq. 8A-1)
6.3 Moisture Volume Collected. Correct'
ed to Standard Conditions.
VM^ . 1.338 x 10-' (tru- nu.) (Eq. flA-2)
6.4 SO, Concentration.
7. Emission Rate Procedure.
If the only emission meacurement desired
is in terms of emission rate of SO, (ns/J),
an abbreviated procedure may be used. The
differences between the above procedure
and the abbreviated procedure are described
below.
7.1 Sample Train. The sample train Is
the same as shown in Figure 6A-1 and as de-
scribed In Section 4. except that the dry gas
meter is not needed.
7.2 Preparation of the Collection Train.
Follow the same procedure at in Section
4.1.1. except do not weigh the isopropanol
bubbler, the SO, absorbing impingers or the
moisture absorber.
7.3 Sampling. Operate the train as de-
scribed In Section 4.1.3. except that dry gas
meter readings, barometric pi CM lire, and
dry g&c meter temperatures need not be re-
corded.
7.4 Sample Recovery. Fallow the proce-
dure In Section 4.2. except do not weigh the
Isopropanol bubbler, the SO, absorbing to-
Dlngers. or the moisture absorber.
7.5 Sample Analysis. Analysis of the per-
oxide solution is the tame as described in
Section O.
7.6 Calculations.
7.6.1 SOi Maes Collected.
(V,- V»)N
(Eq.aA-7)
(Eq.8A-
-------
Section 3.13.10
Date July 1, 1986
Page 4
MrmoD 6B—DrrnurDiATiott or SUITE* Di-
oznc um CAMOW DIOXTDI DWLT AVEUCX
EHIHIOWC PROM Fossn. FTTXL Cotavmon
Sotntcn
/. AfiplicatHUtv end PrineipU
1.1 Applicability. This method applies to
the determination of sulfur dioxide (8Oi)
emissions from combustion sources in tenni
ol concentration (ng/m») and emission rate
(nt/J). and (or the determination of carbon
dioxide (CO,) concentntion (percent) on t
dally (24 hours) bun.
The minim"** detectable limits, upper
limit, and the Interferences for SOi meas-
uremenu are the same as lor Method 8.
EPA-tponsored collaborative studies were
undertaken to determine the magnitude of
repeatability and reproduciblllty achievable
by qualified testers following the procedures
in this method. The result* of the studies
evolve from US field teats including com-
parisons with Methods 3 and 6. For meas-
urements of emhslon rates from wet. flue
gas desulfurization units in (ng/J). the re-
peatability (within laboratory precision) Is
8.0 percent and the reprodueibUlty (between
laboratory precision) Is 11.1 percent
1.2 Principle. A gas sample is extracted
from the sampling point In the suck inter-
mittently over a 24-hour or other specified
time period. Sampling may also be conduct-
ed continuously If the apparatus and proce-
dures are appropriately modified (sea Note
in Section 4.1.1). The SO, and CO, an sepa-
rated and collected In the tunpllns train.
The SOi fraction Is measured by the
barlum-thonn tltratlon method, and CO, is
determined gravtmetrically.
2. Apparatus.
The equipment required (or this method
is the same as specified (or Method 6A. Sec-
tion 2. except the tsopropanol bubbler is not
used. An empty bubbler for the collection of
liquid droplets and does not allow direct
contact between the collected liquid and the
gas sample may be included In the train. For
Intermittent operation, include an industrial
timer-switch destined to operate in the "on"
position at least 2 minutes continuously and
"off" the remaining- period over a repealing
cycle. The cycle of operation in designated
In the applicable regulation. At a minimum.
the samplinc operation should Include at
least 12. equal, evenly-spaced periods per 24
hours.
For applications downstream of tret scrub-
bers, a heated out-of-stack filter (either tor-
Militate class wool or (lea fiber mat) is nec-
essary. The probe and (liter should be
heated continuously to at least 20' C above
the sourced temperature, but not greater
than 120* C. The filter (I.e.. cample gas)
temperature should be monitored to assure
the desired temperature is maintained.
Stainless steel sampling probes, type 316.
are not recommended for use with Method
SB because of potential corrosion and con-
tamination of sample. Olacs probei or other
types of stainless steel, e.g.. Hasteloy or Car-
penter 20 are recommended for Ions-terra
use.
Other samplint equipment, such as Mae
West bubblers and rigid cylinders (or mois-
ture absorption, which requires cample or
reagent volumes other than those specified
In this procedure for full effeetiveneu may
be used, subject to the approval of the Ad-
ministrator.
o
3.
All reagents for sampling and analysis are
the same a* described In Method 6A, Sec-
tion 3. except isopropanol Is not used (or
campunj. The hydrogen peroxide absorbing
solution «h"n be diluted to no lea than 0
percent by volume. Instead of 3 percent as
specified in Method 6. If Method BB is to be
operated In a low sample flow condition
(lea than 100 ml/mln). molecular sieve ma-
terial may be substituted (or Asearite n as
the CO, absorbing material. The recom-
mended molecular sieve material is Union
Carbide Vi« inch pellets, 5A. or equivalent.
Molecular sieve material need not be dis-
carded following the sampling run provided
it Is regenerated as per the manufacturer's
Instruction. Use of molecular sieve material
onflow rates higher than 100 mVmln may
cause erroneous CO, results.
4. Pncttiurt
4.1 Sampling.
4.1.1 Preparation of Collection Train.
Preparation of the sample train is the same
as described in Method flA. Section 4.1.4.
with the addition of the following:
The sampling train Is assembled as shown
In Figure oA-l, except the Isopropanol bub-
bler is not included. The probe must be
heated to a temperature sufficient to pre-
vent water condensation and must include a
filter (either In-sttck. out-of-stack. or both)
to prevent paniculate entrainment in the
peroxide impingers. The electric supply for
the probe heat should be continuous and
separate from the timed operation of the
sample pump.
Adjust the tlmer-rtrttch to operate in the
"on" position from 2 to 4 minutes on a- 2-
hour repeating cycle or other cycle specified
in the applicable regulation. Other timer se-
quences may be uisd with the restriction
that the total sample volume collected is be-
tween 25 and CO liters for the amounts of
sampling reagents prescribed in this
method.
Add cold water to the tank until the 1m-
plngtrs and bubblers are covered at least
two-thirds of their length. TKe Impingers
and bubbler tank must be covered and pro-
tected from inunu heat and direct sue-
light. If freeing conditions exist, the 1m-
plnger solution and the water bath must be
protected.
NOTE Sampling may be conducted' con-
tinuously if a low (low-rate cample pump (20
to 40 ml/mln for the reagent volumes de-
scribed In this method) is usad. Then the
timer-twitch is not necs^iry. In addition, if
the sample pump is designsd for constant
rate campling, the rate meter may be delet-
ed. The total gas volume collected should bs
between 23 and 80 liters for the amounts of
•campling reagents prescribed in this
method.
4.1.3 Leak-Check Procedure. The leak-
check procedure is the cams as dtscrtbed in
Method «. Section 4.1.2.
O
o
-------
4.1.3 Sample Collection. Record the Ini-
tial dry gas meter reading. To begin sam-
pling, position the Up of the probe at the
sampling point, connect the probe to the
tint implnger (or filter), and ct&n the timer
and the sample pump. Adjust the maple
flow to t constant rate of approximately 1.0
llter/mln as Indicated by the rotameter.
Assure that the timer is operating as Intend-
ed, i.e., in the "on" position for the desired
period and the cycle repeats as required.
Durint the 24-hour sampling period.
record the dry gas meter temperature one
time between 8:00 *-m and 11:00 «-m-, and
the barometric pressure.
At the conclusion of the run. turn off the
timer and the sample pump, remove the
probe from the stack, and record the final
gas meter volume reading. Conduct a lea*.
check as described in Section 4.1.2. If a leak
is found, void the test run or use procedures
acceptable to the Administrator to adjust
the sample volume for leakage. Repeat the
step* in this section (4.1.3) for successive
runs.
4.2 Sample Recovery. The procedures for
sample recovery (moisture measurement.
peroxide solution, and aseartte bubbler) are
the same as in Method 6A, Section 4.2.
4.3 Sample Analysis. Analysis of the per-
oxide tmpmger solutions is the same as in
Method 6. Section 4.3.
5. CaJ.lbra.tion
S.I Metering System.
5.1.1 Initial Calibration. The Initial cali-
bration for the volume metennf system is
the same as for Method 6. Section 5.1.1.
5.1.2 Periodic Calibration Check. After
30 days of operation of the test train, con-
duct a calibration check u in Section 5.1.1
above, except for the following variations:
(1) The leak check is not to be conducted.
(2) three or more revolutions of the dry gas
meter must be used, and (3) only two inde-
pendent runs need be made. If the calibra-
tion factor does not deviate by more than 5
percent from the initial calibration factor
determined In Section 5.1.1. then the dry
gas meter volumes obtained during the test
series are acceptable and use of the train
can continue. If the calibration factor devi-
ates by more than 5 percent, recalibrate the
metering system as in Section 5.1.1: and for
the calculations for the preceding 30 days of
data, use the calibration factor (initial or re-
aUlbratlon) that yields the lover gas
volume for each test run. U*e the latest cali-
bration factor for succeeding tests.
5.2 Thermometers. Calibrate against
mercury-tn-glacs thermometers Initially and
at 30-day Intervals.
5.3 Rotametar. The rotameter need not
be calibrated, but should be cleaned and
maintained according to the manufacturer's
instruction.
5.4 Barometer. Calibrate against a mer-
cury barometer Initially and at 30-day inter-
vals.
Section 3.13.10
Date July 1, 1986
Page 5
5.5 Barium Perchlorate Solution. Stan-
d&rize the barium perchlorate solution
aealnst 25 ml of standard lulfurtc add to
which 100 nU of 100 percent icopropanol has
been added.
S. Calculation*
The nomenclature and calculation proce-
dures are the t&me u In Method 8A with
the following exceptions:
P^,. initial barometric pressure for the test
period. ""* Hg.
T.-Absolute meter temperature for the
test period. 'K.
7. rmtwton Itatt Procedure
The emission rate procedure 1s the same
as described In Method 6A. section 7. except
that the timer is needed and Is operated as
described in this method.
t. Sitlioyrcptiy
8.1 Same as for Method fl, citations 1
through 6. with the addition of the follow-
ing:
8.2 Stanley. Jon and P.R. Westlln. An Al-
ternate Method for Stack Oas Moisture De-
termination. Source Evaluation Society
Newsletter. Vol. 3. No. 4. November 1878.
8J Whittle. Richard N. and PJl. Westlln.
Air Pollution Teat Report: Development and
Evaluation of an Intermittent Integrated
SOi/COt Emission Sampling Procedure. En-
vironmental Protection Agency. Emission
Standard and Engineering Division. Emis-
sion Measurement Branch. Research Trian-
gle Part. North Carolina. December 1P7B. 14
paces.
8/t Butler. Prank E: J.E. Knoll. J.C.
Suggs. MJl. Midgett. and W. Mason. The
Collaborative Test of Method 6B: Twenty-
Pour-Hour Analysis of SO. and CO
JAPCA. Vol. 33. No. 10. October 1883.
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.11
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
11.0 REFERENCES
1. Butler, Frank E., Joseph E. Knoll, Jack C. Suggs, M.
Rodney Midgett, and Wade Mason. The Collaborative Test of
Method 6B: Twenty-Four-Hour Analysis of S00 and C00.
JAPCA, Volume 33, No. 10, October 1983, pp. 968-973. ^
2. Federal Register, Volume 47, No. 231, December 1, 1982.
Method 6A - Determination of Sulfur Dioxide, Moisture, and
Carbon Dioxide Emissions From Fossil Fuel Combustion
Sources and Method 6B - Determination of Sulfur Dioxide
and Carbon Dioxide Daily Average Emissions From Fossil
Fuel Combustion Sources.
3. Federal Register, Volume 49, No. 51, March 14, 1984.
Additions and Corrections to Methods 6A and 6B.
4. Fuerst, Robert G. Improved Temperature Stability of
Sulfur Dioxide Samples Collected by the Federal Refer-
ence Method. EPA-600/4-78-018, April 1978.
5. Knoll, Joseph E. and M. Rodney Midgett. The Applica- tion
of EPA Method 6 to High Sulfur Dioxide Concentra- tions.
EPA-600/4-76-038, July 1976.
6. Fuerst, R. G., R. L. Denny, and M. R. Midgett. A Summary
of Interlaboratory Source Performance Surveys for EPA
Reference Methods 6 and 7 - 1977. Available from U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring
and Support Laboratory (MD-77), Research Triangle Park,
N.C. 27711.
7. Fuerst, R. G. and M. R. Midgett. A Summary of Inter-
laboratory Source Performance Surveys for EPA Reference
Methods 6 and 7 - 1978. Report in preparation by U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitor-
ing and Support Laboratory (MD-77), Research Triangle
Park, N.C. 27711.
8. Zolner, W. J. Quenching in a Fluorescent Instrument.
Thermo Electron Corporation, 85 First Avenue, Waltham,
Mass. 17 pages.
9. Wright, R. J. and C. E. Decker. Analysis of EPA Protocol
No. 1 Gases for Use as EPA Method 6B Audit Materials.
Project Report under EPA Contract No. 68-02-4125, June
1986.
,<_
V.
-------
Section No. 3.13.11
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
10. Hines, A., EPA, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, C J
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. Unpublished research. \~s
11. Jayanty, R. K. M., J. A. Sokash, .R. G. Fuerst, T. J. Logan,
and M. R. Midgett. Validation of an Audit Material for
Method 6B. Proceedings of APCA International Specialty
Conference on Continuous Emission Monitoring — Advances and
Issues, October 1985.
o
-------
Section No. 3.13.12
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
12.0 DATA FORMS
Blank data forms are provided on the following pages for the
convenience of the Handbook user. Each blank form has the cus-
tomary descriptive title centered at the top of the page. How-
ever, the section-page documentation in the top right-hand corner
of each page of other sections has been replaced with a number in
the lower right-hand corner that will enable the user to identify
and refer to a similar filled-in form in a text section. For
example, Form M6A&B-1.2 indicates that the form is Figure 1.2 in
Section 3.13.1 (Methods 6A and B) of the Handbook. Future
revisions of these forms, if any, can be documented as 1.2A,
1.2B, etc. Fifteen of the blank forms listed below are included
in this section. Five are in the Method Highlights subsection as
shown by the MH following the form number.
2.5 (MH)
3.1 (MH)
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.6
4.7 (MH)
4.8 (MH)
5.1 (MH)
5.2
5.3
Title
Procurement Log
Wet Test Meter Calibration Log
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Data Form
(English and metric units)
Pretest Sampling Checks
Pretest Preparations
Field Sampling Data Form for
Method 6A
Method 6B Sampling, Sample Recovery,
and Sample Integrity Data Form
Method 6A Sample Recovery and
Integrity Data Form
Sample Label
On-Site Measurements for Method 6A
On-Site Measurements for Method 6B
Posttest Sampling Checks
Sulfur Dioxide Analytical Data Form
Control Sample Analytical Data Form
-------
Section No. 3.13.12
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
5.4 (MH) Posttest Operations ^^
6.1 Method 6A and 6B Calculation Form
(Conversion Factors)
6.2A & 6.2B Method 6A and 6B Sulfur Dioxide
Calculation Form (English and metric
units)
8.2 Method 6A and 6B Checklist to Be
Used by Auditors
o
O
-------
PROCUREMENT LOG
Item description
- Qty-
Purchase
order
number
Vendor
Date
Ord.
Rec.
Cost
Disposition
Comments
Quality Assurance Handbook M6A&B-1.2
-------
WET TEST METER CALIBRATION LOG
Wet test meter serial number
Date
Range of wet test meter flow rate
Volume of test flask V =
Satisfactory leak check?
Ambient temperature of equilibrate liquid in wet test meter and reservoir
Test
number
1
2
3
Manometer
reading, a
mm hUO
Final
volume (V - ) ,
L
Initial
volume (Vj),
L
•total
volume (Vm)b,
in
L
Flask
volume (V ) ,
S
L
Percent
error,0
%
Must be less than 10 mm (0.4 in.) H2O.
Vm = V- - V, .
ra f i
% error = 100 (Vm - V0)/V0 =
ZQ S S ^™^—i«^^^^^^"^™
(+1%).
Signature of calibration person
o
o
Quality Assurance Handbook M6A&B-2.2
o
-------
Date
DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA FORM (ENGLISH UNITS)
Calibrated by Meter box number Wet test meter number
Barometer pressure, P =
in. Hg Dry gas meter temperature correction factor
Wet test
meter
pressure
drop
(Dm>'a
in. H-O
Rota-
meter
setting
(R8>,
ft3/min
Wet test
meter gas
volume
< V 'b
ft3
Dry test meter
gas volume
(vd),b ft3
Initial
Final
Wet test
meter
gas temp
,
°F
Dry test meter
Outlet
gas temp
ltd >,
o
°F
Average
gas temp
,C
°F
Time
of run
(9),d
min
Average
ratio
(Y±),e
(Yr ),f
3 Dm exPressed as negative number.
Volume passing through meter. Dry gas volume is minimum for at least five revolutions of the meter.
c The average of t, and t, if using two thermometers; the actual reading if using one thermometer.
, i o
The time it takes to complete the calibration run.
e With Y defined as the average ratio of volumes for the wet test and the dry test meters, Y.^ = Y +0.02 Y for
calibration and Y.^ = Y +0.05 Y for the posttest checks; thus,
w (td + 460°F) |Pm + (Dm/13.6)]
(tw + 460°F)
(Eq. 1)
and
Y =
(Eq. 2)
With Y defined as the average ratio of volumetric measurement by wet test meter to rotameter.
Tolerance Yr = 1 +0.05 for calibration and Y +J3.1 for posttest checks.
ri
Vw (td + 4bO°F) [Pm + (Dm/13.6)]
8 (tw + 460°F) (Pm) (Rs)
Y2 + Y3
(Eq. 3)
and
(Eq. 4)
Quality Assurance Handbook M6A&B-2.4A
-------
Date
DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA FORM (METRIC UNITS)
Calibrated by Meter box number Wet test meter number
Barometer pressure, P
m
in. Hg Dry gas meter temperature correction factor
Wet test
meter
pressure
drop
(Dm>'a
mm I^O
Rota-
meter
setting
(Rs),
cc/min
Wet test
meter gas
volume
< V 'b
L
Dry test meter
gas volume
(Vd),b L
Initial
Final
Wet test
meter
gas temp
'
°C
Dry test raeter
Outlet
gas temp
'
o
°c
Average
gas temp
(td),c
°C
Time
of run
(8),d
min
Average
ratio
(Y±),e
]
(tw + 273°C) (Pm)
(Eq. 1)
and
Y =
(Eq. 2)
With Y defined as the average ratio of volumetric measurement by wet test meter to rotameter.
Tolerance Y,
1 -H).0b for calibration and Y +0.1 for posttest checks.
C'
(td + 273°C) [Pm + (Dm/13.6)1000,J
8 (tw + 273°C) (Pm) (Rs)
(Eq. 3)
and
(Eq. 4)
O
o
Quality Assurance Handbook M6A&B-rP-s4B
O'
-------
FIELD SAMPLING DATA FORM FOR METHOD 6A
Plant name
Sample location
Operator
Barometric pressure, mm (in.) Hg
Probe material
Meter box number
Ambient temperature, C { F)
Initial leak check
Final leak check
City
Date
Sample number
Probe length m (ft)
Probe heater setting
Meter calibration factor (Y)
Sampling point location
Sample purge time, min
Remarks
Sampling
time,
min
Total
Clock
time,
24 h
Sample
volume ,
L (ft3)
Total
Sample
flow rate
setting,
L/min
(ft3/min)
Sample
volume
metered
'
m_
L (ft5)
Vm
avg
Percent
deviation,
%
Avg
dev
Dry gas
meter
temp,
°C (6F)
Avg
Impinger
temp,
°C <°F)
Max
temp
V - V ave
Percent deviation = m m VB
x 100 (must be within 10 percent)
V avg
m
Quality Assurance Handbook M6A&B-4.1
-------
METHOD 6B SAMPLING, SAMPLE RECOVERY, AND
SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA FORM
Plant
Sample location
Operator
Run No.
Sampling period
Initial leak check
Final leak check
Recovery date
Recovered by
Start:
Stop:
Date
Date
Time
Time
Dry Gas Meter
Final reading
Initial reading
Volume metered
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor, Y
L
"L
"L
Rotameter
Initial setting
Final setting
L or cc/min
L or cc/min
Meter Temperature
Barometric Pressure
o
WF in. Hg
time
Probe Temperat
Initial
Final °
Moisture
1st
Final wt
Initial wt
Net wt
ure Filter
F Initial
F Final
bubbler 2nd
g
g
Total moisture
Temperature
°F
impinger
g
g
g
Ascarite
Final wt
Inital wt
Net wt
3rd impinger
g
g
g
g
time
Column
g
g
g of CO.,
4th bubbler
g
g
g
% spent
O
H2°2
container no.
RECOVERED SAMPLE (If Applicable)
Liquid level
marked
Impinger contents
container no.
H20 blank
container no.
Samples stored and locked
Received by
Remarks
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Date
Quality Assurance Handbook M6A&B-4.2
O
-------
METHOD 6A SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY DATA FORM
Final wt
Initial wt
Net wt
1st bubbler
9
2nd impinger 3rd impinger
9 9
g g
Total moisture
4th bubbler
g
_g
g
% spent
Ascarite column:
Final wt
Initial wt
Net wt
_g of C0
% spent
Recovered Sample
H202 blank
container no.
Impinger contents
container no.
H2O blank
container no.
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Received by
Remarks
Date
Quality Assurance Handbook M6A&B-4.3
(ft*
-------
SAMPLE LABEL
Plant City
Site Sample Type
Date Run Number
Front rinse LJ Front filter Q Front solution 0
Back rinse LJ Back filter O Back solution LJ
Solution Level marked 1— ) j£
Volume: Initial Final
-------
SULFUR DIOXIDE ANALYTICAL DATA FORM
Plant Date
Sample location Analyst
Volume and normality of barium perchlorate
Standardization blank ml (< 0.5 ml)
1
2
3
ml
ml
ml
N
N
N
N,
avg
Sample
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Field
Blank
Sample
identification
number
Total
sample
Sample
aliquot
volume volume
' ^
ml
N/A
ml
Volume of titrant (V. ) , ml
t
1st
titration
2nd
titration
Average
V =
Volume for the blank must be the same as that of the sample aliquot.
b 1st titration
titratlon _ 2nd titration <0.2 ml.
2nd titration
Signature of analyst
Signature of reviewer or supervisor
Quality Assurance Handbook M6A&B-5.2
,/
V
-------
CONTROL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA FORM
Plant
Analyst
Date analyzed
Nr
o
'Ba(Cl04)2
Weight of ammonium sulfate is 1.3214 g?
Dissolved in 2 L of distilled water?
Titration of blank
ml Ba(CIO.)2 (must be <0.5 ml)
Control
sample
number
Time of
analysis,
24 h
a
Titrant volume, ml
1st
2nd
• • •.
3rd
Avg
Two titrant volumes must agree within 0.2 ml.
(ml Ba(C104)2 - ml Blank) x NBa( 25 ml x 0
(control) (control
sample) sample)
ml -
ml) x
N =
(must agree within 5%, i.e., 0.238 to 0.262)
Does value agree? yes _no
Signature of analyst
Signature of reviewer
O
Quality Assurance Handbook M6A&B-5.3
o
-------
METHOD 6A AND 6B CALCULATION FORM (CONVERSION FACTORS)
METER VOLUME (metric to English)
V = . liter
V = Vm (in liters) x 0.03531 ft3/liter = _ . ft3
METER TEMPERATURE (metric to English)
tffl = [tffl (°C) x 1.8] + 32 = . _ °F
Tm " *n, (°F) + 46° = ' - °R
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (metric to English)
pbar = • mm Hg
Pbar = Pbar ^mm HS* x °'03937 ln- Hg/mm Hg = . in. Hg
METER VOLUME (English to metric)
Vm = _ . ___ ft3
Vm = Vm (ft^> x 0.02832 m3/ft3 = . _____ m3
METER TEMPERATURE (English to metric)
*«, - * °F
m _ _ _ _
tm = [tm (°F) - 32] x 5/9 = __ . _ °C
T ' * (°C) * 273 ' • °K
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (English to metric)
Pbar =__•__ in' "3
Pbar = Pbar ^in* Hg^ x 25*4 mm H9/in- Hg = ___ . mm Hg
Quality Assurance Handbook M6A&B-6.1
,3
7
-------
METHOD 6A AND 6B CALCULATION FORM (ENGLISH UNITS)
STANDARD METER VOLUME (English units)
V - £t- Y =
Vm ""_•__ — —' _'
111 ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
'bar = __•__ in. Hg, Tm = . _°R
o
Vm(std) = 17.64 Vm Y
bar
Tm
dscf
C02 VOLUME COLLECTED, STANDARD CONDITIONS
(English units)
n»a£ = ___ • _ 9, mai = ___ • _ 9
V,,- (std) = 0.01930 (m _ - in . ) = . dscf
ou— ar ai — — — — —
Equation 6-1
C02 CONCENTRATION (percent by volume)
Cpn = Vc02(std) - 100 =__.__%
O
2 Vstd> + VC02(std)
Equation 6-4
S02 CONCENTRATION (English units)
Vt = __ . __ ml, Vtb = _. __ ml, N = _. ____ (g-eq)/ml
Vsoln = --- • _ ml, Va = _ _ . _ ml
= 7.061 x 10"5 (Vt - Vtb)N/Vsoln\_
V fstd) + Vnn (std) * Va '
Equation 6-3
Quality Assurance Handbook M6A&B-6.2A
-------
METHOD 6A AND 6B CALCULATION FORM (ENGLISH UNITS)
(continued)
MOISTURE CONCENTRATION (percent)
mwf = ' - 9' mwi = ' - 9
Vw(std) = °-04707 (mwf ~ mwi) = ' dscf Equation 6-2
VH^O(std) x 100 = . %
»T™ . »» "™" ™~~ ""™ """"
H2° Vm(std) + VH20(std) + VC02(std)
EMISSION RATE OF SO2 (English units)
(using meter volumes)
scf of C02/million Btu
= - lb S0,,/million Btu
Equation 6-5
r. _
C — ,
Cco2
(not using meter sample volume)
F = scf of C00/million Btu
C — — — — £.
mcn = 32.03 (V. - V..)N /V , \= . mg of SO0 collected
oU^ t; "to f soini — — — — — z,
* a
1V
Equation 6-6
^ (1.141 x 10"3) m.,^ = . lb S00/million Btu
C oUo — — — — ft
(maf - mai)
Equation 6-7
SO2 CONCENTRATION (ppm)
(ppm) = S07 , . ppm
A _„ ---- —
1.663 x 10 '
Quality Assurance Handbook M6A&B-6.2A
-------
METHOD 6A AND,6B CALCULATION FORM (METRIC UNITS)
STANDARD METER VOLUME (metric units) S~\
(using meter volumes)
liter x 0.001 = . m3
Y = , p = . mm Hg, T . °K
^— — — r — DOJL ""^ ^~ "^ in *~* ^~ ~" ~~
Vm(std) = 0.,3858 VmY Pbar = . _____ dscm
Tm
C02 VOLUME COLLECTED, STANDARD CONDITIONS
(metric units)
J"af = • _ a/ »iai = • _ g
-4
Vrr. (std) = 5.467 x 10 (m ,. - m . ) = . dscm
\**\J*y ClX uJ. "~* """* ~~
Equation 6-1
C02 CONCENTRATION (percent by volume)
c s Vco2(std) 100 = __.__%
C02 " Vm(std) + V (std)
Equation 6-4
S02 CONCENTRATION (metric units)
V. = . ml, V.. = . ml, N = . (g - eq)/ml,
U — — — _~ uD ~~ ~~ ~"" ~~~ ~~~ "~~ "~ *~~
Vsoln « _ ml, Va = _ _ . _ ml
32.03 (Vt - Vtb)
mg/dscm
o
'm(std) C02(std)
Equation 6-3
Quality Assurance Handbook M6A&6B-6.2B ^"^
-------
METHOD 6A AND SB CALCULATION FORM (METRIC UNITS)
(continued)
MOISTURE CONCENTRATION (percent) ,
m
wf
• _ 9' m
wi --- • _
Vm(std) " 1'336 x
(mwf - mwi> '
dscm
Equation 6-2
. _
2
z
x 100 =
V + V + V
vm(std) vH20(std) vC02(std)
EMISSION RATE OF S02 (metric units)
(using meter volumes)
%
Equation 6-5
F =
c
SO
-7
_ . x 10 dscm of C02/J
(not using meter volumes)
F = .
c —
mso2 - 32-03
_
x 10 dscm of CO0/J
(Vt - V,b) N/Vsoln\= . mg of S02 collected
ESO = Fc t1'
Equation 6-6
Equation 6-7
Quality Assurance Handbook M6A&B-6.2B
-------
METHOD 6A AND 6B CHECKLIST TO BE USED BY AUDITORS
o
Yes
No
Comment
Presampling Preparation
1. Knowledge of process conditions
2. Calibration of pertinent equipment, in particular, the
dry gas meter, prior to each field test
On-Site Measurements
3. Leak testing of sampling train after sample run
4. Preparation and addition of absorbing solutions to
impingers
5- Constant rate sampling (for Method 6A only)
6. Purging of the sampling train and rinsing of the
impingers and connecting tubes to recover the sample (for
Method 6A only)
7- Recording of pertinent process conditions during sample
collection
8. Maintaining the probe at a given temperature
O
Postsampling
9. Control sample analysis--accuracy and precision
10. Sample aliquoting techniques
11. Titration technique, particularly endpoint precision
12. Use of detection blanks in correcting field sample
results
13. Weighing of the C0_ absorbant
. Calculation procedure/check
15. Calibration checks
16. Standardized barium perchlorate solution
17. Result of the audit sample
General Comments
-8-2O
Quality Assurance Handbook M6A&B
-------
Section No. 3.14
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
Section 3.14
METHOD 7A - DETERMINATION OF NITROGEN OXIDE
EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
(Grab Sampling - Ion Chromatographic Method)
OUTLINE
Section
SUMMARY
METHOD HIGHLIGHTS
METHOD DESCRIPTION
1. PROCUREMENT OF APPARATUS
AND SUPPLIES
2. CALIBRATION OF APPARATUS
3. PRESAMPUNG OPERATIONS
4. ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
5. POSTSAMPLING OPERATIONS
6. CALCULATIONS
7. MAINTENANCE
8. AUDITING PROCEDURES
9. RECOMMENDED STANDARDS FOR
ESTABLISHING TRACEABILITY
10. REFERENCE METHOD
11. REFERENCES
12. DATA FORMS
Documentation
3.14
3.14
Number of
pages
2
8
3.14.1
3.14.2
3.14.3
3.14.4
3.14.5
3.14.6
3.14.7
3.14.8
3.14.9
3.14.10
3.14.11
3.14.12
10
14
6
7
11
6
2
6
1
3
2
12
-------
Section No. 3.14
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
SUMMARY
o
A gas sample is extracted from the sampling point in the stack.
The sample is collected in an evacuated 2-liter round bottom boro-
silicate flask containing 25 ml of dilute sulfuric acid-hydrogen
peroxide absorbing reagent. The nitrogen oxides, NO and NC>2, react
with the absorbing reagent to form nitrate ion which is analyzed by
ion chromatography (1C). The method does not respond to nitrous
oxide, N20.
The reactions that describe absorption of the NO are distinct
NO and N0«. The common featu
of nitrate, N03~, as nitric acid,
The absorption of NO involves an oxidation-reduction reaction
where the oxidizing agent is the acidic hydrogen peroxide solution.
The two half reactions are:
for NO and N0«. The common feature of the reactions is the formation
~
and
3H2°2 + 6H+ + 6e~ = 6H2°
2ND + 4H0 = 2N0~ + 9H+ + 6e
O
and the overall reaction is:
2NO + 3H2°2 = 2NCi3~ + 2H+ + 2H2°-
The absorption of N02 presumably involves the reaction with water
to form nitric acid and NO. N0« reacts with water to form nitric
acid and nitrous acid, HN02:
2N02 + H20 = HN03 + HN02.
The nitrous acid is unstable and decomposes:
3HN02 = 2NO + HN03 + H20.
The observed reaction is the sum of the two reactions above:
3N02 + H20 = 2HN03 + NO.
Absorption of N02 proceeds faster than absorption of NO because
N02 is more soluble in solution, where reaction occurs. In this
respect, it should be noted that absorption of NO is quickened as a
consequence of reaction with oxygen also present within the flask:
2NO + 02 = 2N02.
If the gas being sampled contains insufficient oxygen for the
conversion of NO to N02, then oxygen should be introduced into the —^
flask by one of three methods: (1) before evacuating the sampling( )
-------
Section No. 3.14
Date July 1, 1986
Page 3
flask, flush it with pure cylinder oxygen, and then evacuate the
flask to 75 mm (3.0 in.) Hg absolute pressure or less; or (2) inject
oxygen into the flask after sampling; or (3) terminate sampling with
a minimum of 50 mm (2.0 in.) Hg vacuum remaining in the flask, record
this final pressure, and then open the flask to the atmosphere until
the flask pressure is almost equal to atmospheric pressure.
Method 7A is applicable to the measurement of nitrogen oxides
emitted from stationary sources. It may be used as an alternative to
Method 7 (as defined in 40 CFR Part 60.8(b)) to determine compliance
if the stack concentration is within the analytical range. The
analytical range of the method is from 125 to 1250 mg NO , expressed
as NO,,, per dry standard cubic meter (65 to 655 ppm"). Higher
concentrations may be analyzed by diluting the sample. The lower
detection limit is approximately 19 mg/m (10 ppm), but may vary
among instruments.
The method description which follows is based on the method that
was promulgated on' December 8, 1983.
Section 3.14.10 contains a copy of Method 7A, and blank data
forms are provided in Section 3.14.12 for the convenience of the
Handbook user.
Note; Because of similarities between Method 7A and Method 7
sampling equipment and procedures, in most cases only the differences
in Method 7A are presented in detail in this section (3.14). How-
ever, all tasks are shown in the activity matrices and data sheets
needed to perform Method 7A are included, whether or not differences
occur in the written descriptions. Other Method 7A procedures are
referenced to the corresponding description in Section 3.6, Method
7. This is done for both time savings to the reader and cost savings
to the Government.
-------
Section No. 3.14
Date July 1, 1986
Page 4
METHOD HIGHLIGHTS
o
Section 3.14 (Method 7A) describes the required procedure for
sampling and analyzing of nitrogen oxides emissions from stationary
sources. For the method, a grab sample is extracted from a point in
the stack, and collected in a previously evacuated flask containing a
sulfuric acid-hydrogen peroxide absorbing solution. With the
exception of nitrous oxide, the nitrogen oxides are oxidized to
nitrate which is analyzed by ion chromatography (1C). Results are
expressed as concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (N02). The
applicable regulation should be consulted to determine whether
additional measurements, such as velocity or 02 determinations, are
required.
The absorbing reagent for EPA Method 7A has a sulfuric acid con-
centration one-tenth that of EPA Method 7. In all other respects,
the sampling train and sampling procedures of EPA Method 7A are iden-
tical to those of EPA Method 7. Sample preparation involves only
dilution to reach a measurable concentration range for the ion
chromatograph.
Ion chromatography is a relatively recent analytical develop-
ment. The reader is referred,2to the literature for detailed
descriptions of the subject. ~ Small, et al., developed th
technique using the principles of ion exchange chromatography
conductimetric detection. Previous attempts to use this type
detection were unsuccessful because of the presence of the backgroun
electrolyte used for elution of the ionic species. Small, et al.,
used a novel combination of resins to separate the ions of interest
and neutralize the eluent from the background.
The aqueous sample is introduced into a fixed-volume sample loop
by using a plastic syringe. Once injected, the sample is carried
through a separation column at different rates according to their
relative affinities for the resin and the eluent and are therefore
separated into discrete bands. The separated ions are then passed
through a post-separation suppressor device, a source of hydrogen ion
(H ), which converts the eluent ions into a less conducting weak acid
while converting the analyte ions into a highly conducting form.
This permits the use of a conductivity cell as a very sensitive
detector of all ionic species.
Gjerde, et al., described a modified ion chromatographic method
that eliminatesthe need for a suppressor device. Anions are
separated on a column containing an anion-exchange resin with a low
exchange capacity. Because of the low capacity, a very dilute
solution of an aromatic organic acid salt may be used as the eluent.
The conductance of the eluent is sufficiently low that no suppression
is needed.
For Method 7A, either suppressed or non-suppressed 1C mayf~\
used. The basic ion chromatograph will have the follow\, J
components:
-------
Section No. 3.14
Date July 1, 1986
Page 5
(a) sample injection device,
(b) anion separation column,
(c) anion suppressor column, either packed bed or fiber
type (not required for non-suppressed 1C),
(d) conductivity detector, and
(e) recorder.
Two critical aspects of Method 7A are (a) the measurement of the
gaseous sample volume, and (b) the preparation of the calibration
standards for the ion chromatograph. Analysts are advised to observe
specified procedures carefully at these points of the method.
Analysts performing the method should be well trained in the use of
the ion chromatograph.
Collaborative testing of EPA Method 7A has not been performed.
However, from a technical standpoint, it can be expected that EPA
Method 7A will exhibit accuracy and precision as good as, if not
better than, EPA Method 7.
The four blank data forms at the end of this section may be
removed from the Handbook and used in the pretest, test, and posttest
operations. Each form has a subtitle (e.g., Method 7A, Figure 3.1)
to assist the user in finding a similar completed form in the method
description (Section 3.14.3). On the blank and filled-in forms, the
items/parameters that can cause the most significant errors are
designated with an asterisk.
1. Procurement of Apparatus and Supplies
Section 3.14.1 (Procurement of Apparatus and Supplies) gives
specifications, criteria, and design features for the required
equipment and materials. The sampling apparatus for Method 7A has
the same design features as that of Method 7. Section 3.14.1 can be
used as a guide for procurement and initial checks of equipment and
supplies. The activity matrix (Table 1.1) at the end of the section
is a summary of the details given in the text and can be used as a
quick reference.
2. Pretest Preparations
Section 3.14.2 (Calibration of Apparatus) addresses the required
calibration procedures and considerations for the Method 7A sampling
equipment (same as Method 7) and analytical equipment (the ion chrom-
atograph). Required accuracies for each component are also included.
A pretest sampling checklist (Figure 3.1 in Section 3.14.3) or a
similar form should be used to summarize the calibration and other
pertinent pretest data. The volume of each collection flask must be
determined with stopcock in place. This volume measurement is
required only on the initial calibration, provided the stopcock is
not changed. The calibration section may be removed along with the
-------
Section No. 3.14
Date July 1, 1986
Page 6
corresponding sections from the other methods and made into a/"""\
separate quality assurance reference manual for use by personnel \)
involved in calibration activities.
Section 3.14.3 (Presampling Operations) provides the tester with
a guide for equipment and supplies preparation for the field test.
With the exception of the preparation of certain reagents, these are
the same as for Method 7. A pretest preparation form (Figure 3.2,
Section 3.14.3) can be used as an equipment checkout and packing
list. The flasks may be charged with the absorbing reagent in the
base laboratory. The method of packing and the use of the described
packing containers should help protect the equipment, but neither is
required by Method 7A.
Activity matrices for the calibration of equipment and the pre-
sampling operations (Tables 2.2 and 3.1) summarize the activities.
3. On-Site Measurements
Section 3.14.4 Ton-Site Measurements) contains step-by-step
procedures for sample collection and for sample recovery. Sample
collections are the same as for Method 7; sample recovery proce-
dures differ slightly from Method 7 in that the sample pH does not
have to be checked and adjusted. The on-site checklist (Figure 4.3,
Section 3.14.4) provides the tester with a quick method of checking
the on-site requirements. When high negative stack pressures are
present, extra care should be taken to purge the leak-tested sample ^^^
system and to be sure the flask is £ 75 mm (3 in. ) Hg absolute^ N
pressure prior to testing. Also, the 16-hour sample residence timeV __ J
in the flask must be observed. Table 4.1 provides an activity
matrix for all on-site activities.
4. Posttest Operations
Section 3.14.5 TPostsampling Operations) gives the posttest
equipment procedures and a step-by-step analytical procedure for
determination of NO , expressed as NO^- Posttest calibration is not
required on any of the sampling equipment. The posttest operations
form (Figure 5.1, Section 3.14.5) provides some key parameters to be
checked by the tester and laboratory personnel. The step-by-step
analytical procedure description can be removed and made into a
separate quality assurance analytical reference manual for the
laboratory personnel. Analysis of calibration standards is conducted
in conjunction with the analysis of the field samples. Strict
adherence to Method 7A analytical procedures must be observed.
Section 3.14.6 (Calculations) provides the tester with the
required equations, nomenclature, and significant digits. It is
suggested that a calculator be used, if available, to reduce the
chances of calculation error. '.:;
Section 3.14.7 (Maintenance) provides the tester with a guide for
a maintenance program. This program is not required, but should
reduce equipment malfunctions. Activity matrices (Tables 5.1, 6.
ly*->.
-------
and 7.1) summarize all postsampling, calculation,
activities.
5.
Section No. 3.14
Date July 1, 1986
Page 7
and maintenance
Auditing Procedure
Section 3.14.8 (Auditing Procedure) provides a description of
necessary activities for conducting performance and system audits.
When Method 7A is used to demonstrate compliance with an EPA poll-
utant emission standard, a performance audit is required to be
conducted of the analytical phase of the method. The data processing
procedures and a checklist for a systems audit are also included in
this section. Table 8.1 is an activity matrix for conducting the
performance and system audits.
Section 3.14.9 (Recommended Standards for Establishing
Traceability) provides the primary standard to which the analysis
data should be traceable.
6. References
Section 3~.14.10 contains the promulgated Method 7A; Section
3.14.11 contains the references cited throughout the text; and
Section 3.14.12 contains copies of data forms recommended for Method
7A.
!<*
-il
-------
Section No. 3.14
Date July 1, 1986
Page 8
PRETEST SAMPLING CHECKS
(Method 7A, Figure 3.1)
Date Calibrated by
Flask Volume
Flask volumes measured with valves? yes no
Volume measured within 10 ml of actual volume?* yes no
Temperature Gauge
Was a pretest temperature correction used? yes no
If yes, temperature correction (within 1°C (2°F)
of reference values for calibration and within HH 2°C
(4°F) of reference values for calibration check).
Vacuum Gauge
Was gauge calibrated against a U-tube mercury manometer (if it
was a mechanical gauge)?* yes no not applicable
Barometer
Was the pretest field barometer reading within 2.5 mm (0.1 in.) Hg
of the mercury-in-glass barometer? yes no
o
o
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
o
-------
Section No. 3.14
Date July 1, 1986
Page 9
PRETEST PREPARATIONS
(Method 7A, Figure 3.2)
Apparatus check
Probe
Glass liner
clean
Heated properly*
Leak checked
Collection Flask
Clean
Leak checked
Temperature
gauge
Evacuation System
Leak-free pumps
Manifold and
tubing
U-tube manometer
Barometer
Reagents
Water
Absorbing solu-
tion*
Sample Recovery
Dropper or burette
Sample bottles
Pipette, 25-ml
Acceptable
Yes
NO
Quantity
required
Ready
Yes
No
Loaded
and packed
Yes
No
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
-------
Section No. 3.14
Date July 1, 1986
Page 10
ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
(Method 7A, Figure 4.3)
Sampling
Volume of 25 ml of absorbing solution** placed in flask?
Flask valve stopper in purge position?
Sampling train properly assembled?
Leak free?* Stopcock grease used?
Type?
Flask evacuated to £75 mm (3 in.) Hg pressure?
Leakage from manometer observation?*
(e.g., maximum change in manometer of £10 mm (0.4 in.)
Hg/min) ,
Initial pressure of flask recorded?*
Initial temperature of flask recorded?
Probe purged before sampling?
Sample collected properly?*
Flask shaken for 5 min after collection and disassembly from
train?*
Samples properly labeled and sealed and stored for shipment?
Sample Recovery
Samples allowed to remain in flasks for minimum of 16 h?*
Final flask temperature and pressure recorded?*
o
Sample transferred to leak-free polyethylene bottle?
Flask rinsed twice with 5-ml portions of water and rinse
added to bottle containing sample?
* Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
** Note that absorbing solution for Method 7A is different from
that of Method 7.
O
f.lt'l
-------
Section No. 3.14
Date July 1, 1986
Page 11
POSTTEST OPERATIONS
(Method 7A, Figure 5.1)
Reagents
Sodium nitrate dried at 105° to 110°C for a minimum of 2 hours
before use?
Stock standard solution (sodium nitrate) less than 1 month old?
Sample Preparation
Has liquid level noticeably changed?*
Original volume Corrected volume
Analysis
Standard calibration curve prepared?*
All calibration points within 7 percent of linear calibration
curve?*
Reagent blanks made from absorbing solution or eluent solution?
Same injection volume for both standards and samples?
Duplicate sample values agree within 5 percent of their mean?
All analytical data recorded on checklist and laboratory form?
* Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.14.1
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
1.0 PROCUREMENT OF APPARATUS AND SUPPLIES
A schematic of the sampling train used for Method 7A is shown in
Figure 1.1. The train and sampling procedures are identical to those
for Method 7. The sample recovery procedures and equipment are also
identical, with the exception that there is no need to check and
adjust the pH of the samples. The analytical procedures and
equipment involved are different.
Specifications, criteria, and/or design features are given in
this section to aid in the selection of equipment or any components
that are different from those in Section 3.6.1. Procedures and
limits (where applicable) for acceptance checks are also given.
Alternative grab sampling systems or equipment capable of measuring
sample volume to within 2% and collecting a sufficient sample volume
to allow analytical repeatability to within 5% may be acceptable,
subject to approval.
During the procurement of equipment and supplies, it is suggested
that a procurement log be used to record the descriptive title of the
equipment, identification number (if applicable), and the results of
acceptance checks. An example of a procurement log is shown in Fig-
ure 1.2. A blank copy of this form is provided in Section 3.14.12
for the convenience of the Handbook user. Calibration data generated
in the acceptance check are to be recorded in the calibration log
book.
The following equipment is that which is specified in Method 7A
and has not already been described in Section 3.6.1 for Method 7.
Table 1.1 at the end of this section summarizes quality assurance
activities for the procurement and acceptance of all apparatus and
supplies for Method 7A including the equipment described in Section
3.6.1.
1.1 Analysis
For the analysis, the following equipment is needed. Alternative
instrumentation (and corresponding procedures) will be allowed,
provided the calibration precision discussed in Section 3.14.2 and
acceptable accuracy can be met.
1.1.1 Volumetric Pipets - Class-A volumetric pipets are required.
For making up the calibration standards, pipets of the following
sizes are needed: one 1-ml, one 2-ml, one 4-ml, one 6-ml, and one
10-ml. Enough 5-ml pipets are needed for preparing calibration
standards, blanks, and samples.
1.1.2 Volumetric Flasks - Two Class-A 50-ml volumetric flasks are
needed for each sample, and one Class-A 50-ml volume'tric flask is
needed for each standard and each blank. Also required are Class-A
200-ml and Class-A 1000-ml sizes. Additional volumetric flasks
(50-ml) may be required for audit samples and for dilution of samples
having concentrations in excess of the 'highest standard.
-------
PROBE
A
T
FILTER
FLASK VALVE
SQUEEZE CULQ
:?.'.? VALVE
PUMP
/
FLASK
FLASK SHIELOJ \
THEf&CMETEfl
Figure 1.1. Method 7A evacuated flask sampling train
TJ O OT
O O CD
IQ rt- O
0) (D rt
H-
tOCj O
C 3
o
O
(-• •
x
CO
I-1 •
VO H1
03 ifk
o
-------
Item description
J~\C~\)c, fatfrry*3l4
-------
Section No. 3.14.1
Date July 1, 1986
Page 4
1.1.3 Analytical Balance - One analytical balance that weighs to 0
mg and a set of Class-S calibration weights to check the accuracy of
the balance (+_ 0.3 mg) upon receipt are needed. The balance should
be serviced or returned to the manufacturer if agreement cannot be
met.
•iO
1.1.4 Ion Chromatograph - The ion chromatograph should, at a mini-
mum, have the components described below.
Sample Injection Device - This device must be capable of deliver-
ing a reproducible volume of sample to the ion chromatograph.
Columns - The ion chromatograph should have an anion separator
column capable of giving duplicate results within 5 percent of mean
value and of resolving the nitrate ion from sulfate ion and from
other species present. Both the Dionex HPIC-ASC fast run anion
column for suppressed 1C and the Wescan 269-029 Anion/R Column for
non-suppressed 1C have been demonstrated to give acceptable separ-
ation. If suppressed 1C is to be used, an anion suppressor column is
required. The Dionex AFS anion fiber suppressor (recommended) or
ASC-1 general purpose suppressor may be used. Suppressor columns are
generally produced as proprietary items; however, one can be made in
the laboratory using the resin available from BioRad Company, 32nd
and Griffin Streets, Richmond, California.
Pump - The pump must be capable of maintaining a steady eluent
flow as required by the system.
Flow Gauges - These must be capable of measuring the specified
eluent flow rate. It is recommended that the gauge be calibrated
upon receipt.
Conductivity Detector with Temperature Compensation - It should
be capable of giving responses that can be integrated with a precis-
ion of +_ 5 percent. It is recommended that the detector be cali-
brated according to manufacturer's procedures prior to initial use.
Recorder - It should be compatible with the output voltage of the
detector.
1.2 Reagents
Unless otherwise indicated, it is intended that all reagents
conform to the specifications established by the Committee on
Analytical Reagents of the American Chemical Society (ACS), where
such specifications are available; otherwise, use the best grade
available.
1.2.1 Sampling - To prepare the absorbing solution, cautiously add
2.8 ml concentrated HoS04 to a 100~ml flask containing water (see
specifications in Subsection 1.2.3 below), and dilute to volume with
mixing. Add 10 ml of this solution, along with 6 ml of 3%
o
-------
Section No. 3.14.1
Date July 1, 1986
Page 5
hydrogen peroxide that has been freshly prepared from 30% hydrogen
peroxide, to a 1-liter flask. Dilute to volume with water (see
Subsection 1.2.3), and mix well. The absorbing solution must be used
within 1 week of its preparation and, if possible, within 24 hours.
Store in a dark-colored bottle. Do not expose to extreme heat or
direct sunlight. Refrigerate the 30% hydrogen peroxide solution.
Note; The H2S04 content of this absorbing solution is 10 times less
than that used for Method 7. The solution is prepared in this manner
to avoid interference from sulfate ions during the analysis by 1C.
1.2.2 Sample Recovery - Use ASTM D1193-82, Type III water (see
Subsection 1.2.3) for sample recovery and in making various
solutions. At the option of the analyst, the KMnO. test for
oxidizable organic matter may be omitted whenever high concentrations
of organic matter are not expected to be present.
1.2.3 Analysis - For the analysis, the following reagents are
required.
Water - Water should be used which conforms with ASTM specifi-
cation D1193-82> Type III. Type III water is prepared by distilla-
tion, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, or a combination thereof,
followed by polishing with a 0.45 vm membrane filter. The specifica-
tions for Type III water are shown below.
Specifications for ASTM D1193-82, Type III Water
Total matter, max., (mg/L) 1.0
1.0
Electrical conductivity, max.,
(vmho/cm) at 25 C
Electrical resistivity, min.,
(ymho/cm) at 25
pH at 25°C
Minimum color retention time
of KMn04, (min)
Maximum soluble silica, (vig/L)
1.0
6.2 to 7.5
10
10
Note; Mention of "water" anywhere in this Section (3.14) refers to
ASTM D1193-82, Type III water as described above. By using water
from the same source for making reagents, calibration standards, and
eluents for the ion chromatograph, the effects of trace quantities of
nitrate in the water will be negated with regard to sample analysis.
Therefore, a water blank correction is not necessary in the develop-
ment of the calibration curve.
;/
r
-------
Section No. 3.14.1
Date July 1, 1986
Page 6
Sodium Nitrate - Dry an adequate amount of sodium nitrate (NaN03)( j
at 105 to 110 C for a minimum of 2 hours just prior to preparing tttev—/
standard solution. (The analyst should note that potassium nitrate,
KNO,j, is used in EPA Method 7; KNCU is an acceptable alternative for
Method 7A. ) J ..
Stock Standard Solution, 1 mg NO^/ml - To prepare, dissolve
exactly 1.847 g of dried NaNO3 (or 2.198 g of dried KN03) in water,
and dilute to 1 liter in a volumetric flask; mix well. Tnis solution
is stable for 1 month and should not be used beyond this time.
The use of old solution may cause results to be biased high.
Solutions are readily contaminated by microorganisms that feed on
nitrate ion. Unquantified loss of nitrate ion from the standard
solution causes the high bias.
Working Standard Solution, 25 yg NO^/ml - Dilute 5 ml .of the
standard solution to 200 ml with water in a volumetric flask, and mix
well.
Eluent Solution - Use an eluent appropriate to the column type
and capable of resolving nitrate ion from sulfate and other species
present. The following eluents have been demonstrated to give
acceptable separation:
Suppressed 1C — 0.0024M Na2C03/0.003M NaHC03. To prepare, weigh/^N
1.018 g of sodium carbonate (Na2C03) and 1.008 g of sodiuif )
bicarbonate (NaHC03), and dissolve in 4 liters of water. ^~^
Non-Suppressed 1C — 0.007M p-hydroxybenzoic acid, pH 8.4. To
prepare, weigh 3.867 g p-hydroxybenzoic acid, and dissolve in 4
liters of water. Adjust to pH 8.4 with lithium hydroxide.
Quality Assurance Audit Samples - Same as required by Method 7
(Section 3.6.8).
o
-------
Section No. 3.14.1
Date July 1, 1986
Page 7
TABLE 1.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR PROCUREMENT OF APPARATUS
AND SUPPLIES
Apparatus/
supplies
Probe
Collection
flask
Flask valve
Temperature
gauge
Vacuum line
tubing
Vacuum gauge
Vacuum pump
Squeeze bulb
Volumetric
pipettes
Acceptance criteria
Borosilicate glass
stainless steel, or Tef-
lon tubing capable of
removing moisture
condensation
Two-liter borosilicate
glass round bottom, short
neck w/24/^0 standard
taper opening
Borosilicate glass T-bore
stopcock w/24/40 standard
taper male joint (joint
connection to be made by
glassblower)
Dial- type, capable of
measuring from -5 to
•f50°C within 1°C
Capable of withstanding
75 mm absolute pressure
U-tube manometer, open
end,-l m with 1-mm divi-
sions
Pump capable of pulling
vacuum of 75 nun Hg or
less
Rubber, one way
1-, 2-, H-, 5-, 6-, 10-,
25-ml Class-A glass and
graduated 5 -ml
Frequency and method
of measurement
Upon receipt, visually
check for cracks or
flaws and heating capa-
bility
Upon receipt, visually
check, and leak check
Visually check upon
receipt
,• 9
Visually check upon
receipt, and compare
against Mg-in-glass
thermometer
Upon recer.pt, visually
check and leak check
Visually check upon
receipt
Upon receipt, check with
suitable pressure gauge
Visually check upon
receipt
As above
Action if
requirements
are not met
Return to sup-
plier, and
note in pro-
curement log
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
(continued)
/frfr
-------
Section No. 3-14.1
Date July 1, 1986
Page 8
Table 1.1 (continued)
o
Apparatus/
supplies
Acceptance criteria
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Stopcock
grease
High vacuum high temper-
ature chlorofluorocarbon
grease
As above
As above
Barometer (or
consult lo-
cal weather
station)
Capable of reading atmos-
pheric pressure to
+2.5 mm Hg
Visually check; cali-
brate against mercury-
in-glass barometer
As above
Storage bottle
Polyethylene, 100-ml, or
greater capacity, screw
cap
Visually check upon
receipt
Return to sup-
plier and note
in procurement
log
Wash bottle
Polyethylene or glass
Visually check label
upon receipt
As above
O
Analytical
balance
Capable of measuring
to +0.1 mg
Check with standard
weights upon receipt
and before each use
Replace or
return to man-
ufacturer
Volumetric
cylinders
50-ml (Class-A) with
1-ml divisions
As above
As above
Ion Chroma-
tograph
1. Columns
(continued)
1. Capable of giving
nitrate ion peaks
with baseline
separation; capable of
giving duplicate results
within 5 percent of mean
value
1. Check during
analyses
1. Consult op-
erator's manu-
al ; regenerate
suppressor
column; clean
separator
column; check
performance
of components
below; replace
column(s) if
above actions
are unsuccess-
ful
O
/ ../ft/
-------
Table 1.1 (continued)
Section No. 3.14.1
Date July 1, 1986
Page 9
Apparatus/
supplies
Acceptance criteria
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
2. Pump
3. Flow
control
4. Conduc-
tivity
detector
5. Recorder
2. Capable of delivering
eluent at constant and
repeatable flow rate
3. Capable of giving
repeatable indications
of eluent flow rate
4. Capable of giving
responses which can be
manually or electron-
ically integrated within
a precision of 5 percent
5. As above, if used to
record responses for
manual integration
2. Check during analyses
by monitoring flow rate
3. Check calibration
and repeatability upon
receipt
4. Calibrate according
to manufacturer's in-
structions prior to use
5. Check during
analyses
2. Consult oper-
ator's manual;
oil, clean, re-
repair, replace,
or return to man-
ufacturer; check
tubing of
ion chroma-
tograph for
leaks or ob-
structions;
check flow meter
performance
3. Consult oper-
ator's manual;
adjust, repair,
replace, or re-
turn to manu-
facturer;
check pump per-
formance
4. Consult opera-
tor 's manual;
Repair, replace,
or return to
manufacturer
5. Consult opera-
tor's manual;
adjust speed
Water
Meets ASTM D1193-82;
Type III
Check each lot, or
specify type when
ordering
Replace, or re-
turn to manu-
facturer
(continued)
-------
Section No. 3.14.1
Date July 1, 1986
Page 10
Table 1.1 (continued)
Apparatus/
supplies
Sulfuric
acid
Hydrogen
peroxide
Sodium nitrate
Sodium carbon-
ate
Sodium bicar-
bonate
p-Hydroxy-
benzoic acid
Acceptance criteria
Concentrated, ACS re-
agent grade
$0% aqueous solution,
ACS reagent grade
(store refrigerated)
ACS reagent grade
ACS reagent grade
ACS reagent grade
ACS reagent grade
Frequency and method
of measurement
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
Action if
requirements
are not met
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.14.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
2.0 CALIBRATION OF APPARATUS
Calibration of apparatus is one of the most important functions
in maintaining data quality. It is highly recommended that a labor-
atory log book of all calibrations be maintained. Calibration proce-
dures for the collection flasks, field barometer, thermometers,
vacuum gauge, and analytical balance used in Method 7A are the same
as those described for Method 7 (see Section 3.6.2) and are not
duplicated in this section; a form, however, for use in the analy-
tical balance calibration is shown in Figure 2.1. Detailed calibra-
tion procedures for the ion chromatograph system are described in
this section. Table 2.2 at the end of this section summarizes the
quality assurance activities for all calibrations in Method 7A
including those described in Section 3.6.2.
2.1 Ion Chromatograph System
For Method 7A, the calibration of the ion chromatograph (1C)
system, except for the initial calibration of the conductivity
detector, is conducted in conjunction with analysis of the field
samples. Specifically, the field samples are analyzed twice in
between three analyses of the ion chromatograph calibration stan-
dards; the exact sequence is discussed in detail in Section 3.14.5.
The three analyses of the calibration standards are used to prepare a
calibration curve that is used to determine a calibration factor for
calculating the concentration of nitrogen oxides in the field
amples. It is, however, highly recommended that the analyst conduct
preliminary calibration of the 1C any time the system is set up for
analysis of NO field samples. For this reason, the full discus-
sion of the analysis of calibration standards and preparation of the
calibration curve is presented in this section. Also addressed in
this section are preliminary considerations in preparing the 1C
system for use and other considerations for ensuring quality data.
2.1.1 Preliminary Considerations
Conductivity Detector - Prior to its initial use, the conductiv-
ity detector of the ion chromatograph must be calibrated by the
method described in the operator's manual.
Recorder - A strip chart recorder compatible with the output
voltage range of the conductivity detector may be used to record the
ion chromatogram. Manual measurement techniques that can be used for
quantitation of the chromatogram include (a) peak height, (b) peak
area by triangulation, (c) peak area by multiplying peak height times
the peak width at half-height, (d) peak area by cutting out the peak
from the chromatogram and weighing it on an analytical balance, and
(e) peak area by planimetry.
The use of an electronic integrator, if available, is recommended
for greater accuracy and precision. The electronic integrator can be
used in the peak area mode when the integration parameters are set up
-------
Balance name
r
Section No. 3.14.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
Number B//
Classification of standard weights
o
Date
/zs$r
0.5000 g
0. 5~5#
-------
Section No. 3.14.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 3
properly. The key integration parameters for peak area determination
concern the identification of the beginning and end of a peak and the
placement of the baseline under the peak,. Analysts should carefully
read the operator's manual and understand the selection and set up of
the integration parameters for their particular integrator. The
electronic integrator can also be used in the peak height mode
provided that the peaks are symmetrical and an acceptable standard
calibration curve can be generated without any calibration point
deviating from the line by more than 7 percent (see Subsection 2.1.3
of this section).
Sample Injection Device Contamination Check - The analyst is
encouraged to check the sample injection device for contamination by
injecting water before the calibration standards are analyzed.
Contaminants will appear as peaks on the chromatogram. Repeated
injections of water should be used to remove contaminants from the
sample injection device. If certain peaks remain after several
injections of water then the water may be contaminated and should be
replaced.
Separation of Nitrate, NO3 - To ensure accurate results from the
ion chromatographic analysis, baseline separation of the nitrate ion
(N03~) peak from the other ion peaks should be achieved. For_Method
7A, the separation of the N03~ peak from the sulfate ion (SO.") peak
is of major concern. The S0.~ originates primarily from the sulfuric
acid absorbing reagent. A second source of SO. in a sample may be
sulfur dioxide present in the effluent stream sample. Figures 2.2a
and 2.2b show two chromatograms, one having overlapping NO..,' and SO."
peaks, and the other having baseline separation of the NO3 and SO."
peaks. The sulfuric acid concentration in the absorbing reagent used
for Method 7A is 10 times less than that for Method 7 to minimize the
problem of adequately separating N03~ from flO. .
The analyst is encouraged to check the performance of the ion
chromatograph system before analyzing samples in order to ensure
baseline separation of NOq~ is attainable. A test for baseline
separation of N03~ can be made by preparing a performance check
sample and analyzing during the recommended preliminary calibration
as follows:
1. Pipet 10.0 ml of the 25 yg NO2/ml working standard solution
into a 50-ml volumetric flask.
2. Into the same volumetric flask, pipet 5 ml of absorbing
reagent.
3. Dilute with water to the mark.
4. Analyze this performance check sample with calibration
standards in the same manner as described for field samples (see
Subsections 5.1.4, 2.1.2, and 2.1.3).
!/*
-------
Section No. 3.14.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 4
SO,
Figure 2.2a. Example chromatogram having
overlapping peaks.
Figure 2.2b. Example chromatogram showing
baseline separations of peaks.
o
O
O
-------
Section No. 3.14.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 5
The analyst should check the chromatogram of the performance
check sample for baseline separation. If the baseline separation is
marginal for the performance check sample and the samples have N0~
concentrations close to that of the highest standard (5 yg N0~/ml7,
the analyst should closely monitor subsequent field sample
chromatograms to ensure that results are not adversely affected by
deterioration of the ion chromatograph column or varying performance
of the ion chromatograph.
The final aspect of the performance check involves a precision
assessment. The result from the analysis of the performance check
sample should agree within 5 percent of the value for the 5 yg NO^/ml
calibration standard data point.
2.1.2 Preparation of Calibration Standards - The preparation of the
calibration standards is perhaps the most critical aspect of the
Method 7A analysis, since the quality of sample results will only be
as good as the quality of the calibration. The steps observed in the
preparation of the calibration standards are detailed below.
Stock Standard Solution
1. Dry approximately 5 g ACS-grade sodium nitrate (NaNCU) in an
oven at 105 to 110 C for at least 2 hours prior to use.
Drying of the NaN03 is necessary to prevent NO results from
being biased high because of absorbed moisture.
2. Calibrate the analytical balance using a 2-g Class-S calibra-
tion weight (see Figure 2.1 for an example form). The
balance reading should agree within 2 mg of the Class-S
calibration weight. Corrective actions should be taken if
this agreement is not achieved.
3. Allow the dried NaN03 to cool to room temperature in a desic-
cator. When the reagent has cooled, weigh out 1.847 g to
+0.002 g. Cooling is required to prevent weighing errors
originating from convection currents. Storage of the NaNO«
in the desiccator ensures that moisture will not be adsorbed;
4. Place weighed NaNO^ in a 1-liter Class-A volumetric flask and
dissolve in exactly 1 liter of water. Label the flask
accordingly: '
NaNO3(aq)
StocR Standard
for EPA Method 7A
(1 mg NO,,/ml)
Date
Analyst's Initials
-------
Section No. 3.14.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 6
o
The solution is stable for one month and should not be used
beyond that time. After about one month, there is increased
risk that the reagent will be contaminated by microorganisms
that feed on nitrate. The use of such contaminated reagents
will cause NO results to be biased high.
X
Working Standard Solution
5. Pour about 25 ml of stock standard solution into a clean,
dry beaker.
6. Using a 5-ml Class-A pipet, pipet 5 ml of stock standard
solution into a 200-ml Class-A volumetric flask. Dilute to
the calibration mark with water, and mix well.
This solution is the Working Standard; its nitrate content
represents a concentration of 25 yg N02/ml. The working
standard solution is prepared fresh for each set of
analyses.
Calibration Standards
7. Prepare a series of five calibration standards by pipetting
1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, and 10.0 ml of working standard soluti
(25 vjg/ml) into a series of five 50-ml Class-A volumetrif J
flasks. The standard masses will equal, 25, 50, 100, 150/—/
and 250 pg N02, respectively. Dilute to the mark with either
water or eluent solution, and mix well.
The choice of diluent is determined by practical considera-
tions. If the "water dip" (see Figure 2.2) is expected to
interfere with the nitrate peak of the chromatogram, then
eluent should be used as the diluent since this will
minimize the "water dip." Note: Whichever diluent is used,
it is important for the analyst to use. the same diluent for
the field samples, the calibration standards, and the blank,
as specified in the Federal Register.
2.1.3 Preparation and Validation of the Calibration Curve - Method
7A specifies the determination of a calibration factor, S, which is
used to calculate the concentration of NO in the field samples. S
is defined as the reciprocal of the slopexof the calibration curve,
which is determined by preparing or calculating a linear regression
plot of the standard masses of the calibration standards (vg) versus
instrument response (peak height or area). Determination of S does
not take into account the y-intercept, if present, of the calibration
curve.
The first subsection that follows describes the calibration pro-
cedures and the determination of the calibration factor as specifie/"~"\
in Method 7A. The second subsection offers an alternative approach! j
acceptable to the Administrator, for conducting the calibration—^
-------
Section No. 3.14.2
Date July 1, 1986
- Page 7
calculations that utilize the non-zero y-intercept, if present. This
approach is based on the calibration procedures of Method 7D and
involves the determination of a calibration equation. A data form
which can be used with both approaches is presented in Figure 2.3.
Determination of the Calibration Factor (S) - The determination
of the calibration factor, S, involves the three steps presented
below.
1. Analyze each of the calibration standards (25, 50, 100, 150,
and 250 yg NO,) three times using the ion chromatograph. Document
chromatograms fsee Subsection 5.1.4) and record the results on the
analytical data form for calibration standards (Figure 2.3). Average
the three responses for each of the five standards.
2. Use the average response for the five calibration standards
to calculate the slope of the calibration curve, graphically, by
least squares, or by linear regression. To calculate the slope
graphically, plot the instrument response (peak height or area count)
on the y-axis against the corresponding N02 standard concentration
value on the x-axis. Draw a "best-fit" line between the points and
determine the slope of the line. Least squares (a method acceptable
to the Administrator) can be hand calculated and is shown in Figure
2.3. To calculate the slope by linear regression, use the N02
standards as the independent variable (x-axis) and the corresponding
instrument response as the dependent variable (y-axis).
3. The calibration factor, S, is calculated as the reciprocal of
the slope of the calibration curve, determined from the "best-fit"
line or the linear regression equation. Any y-intercept is ignored.
4. The calibration factor, S, and therefore, the curve must be
validated. Using the calibration factor for calculation, the pre-
dicted sample mass for each calibration standard is compared with the
known value for that standard. The predicted sample mass must not
deviate from the known standard concentration by more than 7%. The
quantity "yg N02 Predicted" is calculated using the calibration
factor (S) and the detector response (H), in millimeters or integra-
tor response, as shown in Equation 2-1.
Equation 2-1
yg N02 = S (yg/mm) x Detector (mm)
Predicted Response
H
The deviation of each predicted sample mass from the known mass is
calculated using Equation 2-2.
Equation 2-2
Deviation = yg NO2 Predicted - yg NO2 Standard x 1QQ%
(%) yg N02 Standard
V.
-------
Plant
Date
/
Location
1 Analyst
Section No. 3.14.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 8
o
Was an integrator used?' yes
Was the intercept (I) used for calculat
ions? yes K no
Were all points within 7 percent of calculated value? S yes
Sample
Identifier
Std 1
Std 2
Std 3
Std 4
Std 5
Sample
Mass
(yg NOJ
25
50
100
150
250
Integrator Response
or Peak Height (mm)
H
1
O.I
/ZST*
2.$. 3
38- /
6>0.}
2
6.4-
ll't
1*3
39. /
527
3
62~
tf.0
zs-.r
30.^
5^.6,
Avg
' 6-25
72.66
ZfT.23
3^.00
5"f,6?
Predicted
Sample Mass
(yg N00)
52. //
/oz. i^
/r7./r
jL-f-3. ;r
no
Deviation
(*)
^/^6
/-^.23
^^.72-
1-4-.77
-^.5o
Predicted Sample Mass using Least Squares to Calculate Calibration Factor (S)
with Zero Intercept
S - S1H1
S2H2
S3H3
S5H5
H
H
H
S =
S =
v g N02/mm
Predicted Sample Mass (yg N0_)
pg N0 = H x S = (6E3 ) x
Equation 2-1
Predicted Sample; Mass using Linear Regression to Calculate Calibration Factor (S)
and Non-Zero Intercept (I) ' --• , " '
y = mx + b; m =
b =
x=i(y-b);i=S=
m m
y = H; and b = I (Intercept) =
Predicted Sample Mass (yg NOp)
yg N02 = S(H - I)
pg N0_ at 25 yg standard =
Equation 2-4
Figure 2.3- Analytical data form for analysis of calibration standards.
.0
-------
ji Section No. 3.14.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 9
This calculation is performed for each calibration standard using the
average of the three response measurements. If any point (known con-
centration of standard) deviates from the line (predicted concentra-
tion) by more than +7 percent, that standard should be remade and
reanalyzed.
Linear regression using a hand-held calculator is recommended to
obtain the slope (and equation) for the calibration curve. Inexpen-
sive calculators are available which have linear regression programs
that are quick and simple to use. Graphical techniques are relative-
ly simple matters when all the calibration data points lie on or
close to the line. However, when deviations from linearity occur,
the placement of the "best-fit" line becomes ambiguous because the
data points are not evenly distributed.
Determination of the Calibration Equation - As discussed pre-
viously, Method 7A directs that the calibration factor, S, be used to
calculate the field sample analytical results. In cases where the
calibration curve does not pass through the origin, the procedure of
Method 7A could give biased results for both the field samples and
the linearity check since the equatiori for the calibration curve will
contain an intercept term not taken into account in the calculations.
Accordingly, this section offers an alternative calibration approach
adapted from Method 7D. The approach involves determination of a
calibration equation which takes into account both the slope of the
calibration curve and any y-intercept term and which is used in
calculating the NO concentration of field samples.
A
Derive the linear calibration equation or curve using linear
regression. The calibration equation should be expressed in the
following form:
y = m x + b Equation 2-3
where
m = slope of the linear calibration curve, which is equal to
the reciprocal of the calibration factor, 1/S, and
b = y-intercept of linear calibration curve which will be
referred to as "I" for purposes of later calculations.
As discussed in the previous section, Method 7A requires that none
of the calibration data points deviate from the calibration curve by
more than 7 percent of the concentration at that point. Method 7A
(Section 5.2.3) states that deviations can be determined by
multiplying the calibration factor S times the peak height response
for each standard. When the calibration equation with intercept is
used, the quantity "yg N02 Predicted" is computed using the following
equation:
-------
Section No. 3.14.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 10
yg N02 = S (yg/mm) /Detector (mm) - I (mm)\ Equation 2-4
Predicted ( Response I
As before, calculation of the % deviation from the line is
accomplished using Equation 2-2. If any deviation is greater than
7%, the corresponding standard should be remade and reanalyzed. If
this does not result in improved results, other approaches are
discussed in the following subsection "Other Considerations."
2.1.4 Other Considerations - Method 7A requires that if any calibra-
tion standard point deviates from the standard calibration curve by
more than 7%, then that corresponding calibration standard is to be
remade and reanalyzed. This corrective action may not always reduce
the calibration point deviations below 7%. Some potential causes for
deviation of the calibration points from the calibration curve
include (a) improper pipetting procedures used to prepare calibration
standards, (b) improper technique for manual sample Injection into
the ion chromatograph, (c) inaccurate measurement of the ion
chromatograph response, and (d) non-linear detector response. Table
2.1 shows the precisions for calibration operations for Method 7A.
TABLE 2.1. TARGET PRECISIONS FOR
CALIBRATION OPERATIONS OF METHOD 7A
O
Operation Precision Target (%)
Pipetting 1
Introduction of Samples <1
into Ion Chromatograph
Measurement Response
o Peak Height 1-4
o Triangulation 4
o Height X Width at
Half-Height 3
o Electronic Integration <0.5
Pipetting Procedure and Pipetting Errors - In preparing the
calibration standards, pipetting is the most critical step. Serious
errors can originate from poor pipetting technique. In general,
errors will appear as high biased NO results. The correct pipetting
procedure is described below.
o
-------
Section No. 3.14.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 11
The pipet should be inspected before use and checked to ensure
that the tip is not chipped. The pipet should be replaced if a chip
is observed.
The pipet should be rinsed with the reagent to be pipetted and
checked for cleanliness before use as follows. Approximately 2 ml of
reagent is drawn into the pipet, which is then rotated and tilted in
order to expose the inner surface to the solution. The rinse solu-
tion is then allowed to drain freely from the pipet into a beaker
assigned for waste. If the pipet is clean, the analyst will observe,
after about 10 seconds, that all the rinse solution will have drained
from the pipet with the exception of a small quantity remaining in
the tip. If this is not observed, either the pipet should be
cleaned, or another pipet should be obtained. The rinse and check
for cleanliness should be performed at least once.
For the actual pipetting, reagent is drawn into the pipet until
the liquid meniscus is above the calibration mark. The pipet is then
withdrawn from the solution and the end is wiped with a laboratory
tissue. Next, the pipet is brought to a vertical position and its
tip is brought to touch the inside of the beaker assigned for waste.
The liquid in the pipet is then allowed to drain slowly until the
meniscus coincides with the calibration mark.
The pipet is then transferred to the appropriate container and,
with the pipet in a vertical position and its tip touching the inside
wall of the container, the liquid is allowed to drain freely into the
container. The pipet's tip should be kept in contact with the wall
for roughly 10 seconds after the liquid has apparently drained. The
pipet is then removed from the container without disturbing the small
amount of liquid remaining in the tip.
It is important to recognize that Class-A pipets are calibrated
in a manner which accounts for the drainage time and the liquid
remaining in the tip. If dirty pipets are used or if the proper
draining technique is not observed, NO results will be biased high.
Low biases will occur if the liquid remaining in the pipet tip is
blown out into the receiving container. The significance of these
biases depends on the size of the pipet involved. For example, the
error with a dirty 25-ml pipet may be undetectable, while the error
for a 1-ml pipet can easily exceed 10 percent.
The precision of the pipetting operation can be checked gravimet-
rically using water. The technique involves pipetting a known volume
of water into a tared container and determining the weight of the
water. The precision of the pipetting operation is estimated from
the results of several repetitions.
The procedure for manually injecting a sample into the ion chrom-
atograph can be a source of error when analyzing calibration stan-
dards, field samples, and QA samples. For fixed loop injection
systems, considerable variation can result from injecting the sample
-------
Section No. 3.14.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 12
into the loop too fast, resulting in the sample loop not being
completely filled. A slow, deliberate injection of the sample into
the loop will completely fill the loop. The precision of the
injection procedure can be checked by performing repetitive analyses
on a single sample.
Chromatogram Quantitation - The choice of quantitation methods
for the ion chromatograms can also be a source of error when analy-
zing calibration standards, field samples, and QA samples. As shown
in Table 2.1, measurement of the detector response by manual methods
has a higher degree of imprecision compared to measurement by elec-
tronic integration. Method 7A states that peak height measurement
can be used provided the peaks are symmetrical and the required 7%
deviation of calibration points from the standard calibration curves
can be met. The peak height measurement method, even with symmetri-
cal peaks, may not produce a linear standard caliration curve because
the peak width of the higher concentration standards will typically
be wider than the peak width of the lower concentration standards.
Figure 2.4 shows the difference in the linearity of ion chromato-
graphic calibration curves using the peak area mode and the peak
height mode. The dead volume of the ion chromatograph system,
particularly suppressed ion chromatograph systems, can also affect
the peak width. Quantitation by peak area measurement will eliminate
the biases caused by widening peaks provided the peak area
measurement is done properly. The use of an electronic integrator in—,^^
the peak area mode for ion chromatograms with baseline separation c[ )
the nitrate peak will produce the most precise calibration curves anV^x
subsequent accurate analyses of field samples and QA samples.
o
-------
Response
Section No. 3.14.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 13
Peak Area
Approach
X>
Peak Height
Approach
1OO
ug N
150
Z.OO 2.50
Figure 2.4,
Linear and non-linear ion chroma
tographic calibration curves.
-------
Section No. 3.14.2
Date July 1, 1986
Page 14
TABLE 2.2. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR CALIBRATION OF EQUIPMENT
o
Apparatus
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Collection
flask
Measure volume within
10 ml
On receipt, measure with
graduated cylinder
Recalibrate
Barometer
Reading agrees within
2.5 mm (0.1 in.) Hg of
mercury-in-glass
barometer
Upon receipt and before
each field test
Repair
or return
Thermometer
Reading agrees within
1°C (2DF) of mercury-
in-glass thermometer
As above
As above
Vacuum gauge
(mechanical
only)
Reading agrees within
2.5 mm (0.1 in.) Hg
of mercury U-tube mano-
meter
As above
As above
Analytical
balance
Weight within 2 mg of
standard weights
(Class S)
Use standard weight
before preparation of
working solution
Repair or
return to
manufacturer
O
Ion chroma-
tograph
Calibration curve should
be linear; data points
for calibration stan-
dards must not deviate
from the linear calibra-
tion curve by more than
+7 percent
With each set of field
samples; calibration
standards prepared from
sodium nitrate
Interpret data
using another
technique: e.g.,
if using peak
height, change
to peak area;
conduct addi-
tional analy-
ses of cali-
bration stan-
dards; cali-
brate conduc-
tivity detec-
tor; consult
operator's
manual
O
-------
Section No. 3.14.3
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
3.0 PRESAMPLING OPERATIONS
This section addresses the preparation and packing of supplies
and equipment needed for the sampling. The pretest preparation form
(Figure 3.1) can be used as an equipment checklist. Many presampling
operations for Method 7A are identical to those for Method 7. This
section will only discuss the operations that are different; however
all quality assurance activities for Method 7A presampling operations
are summarized in Table 3.1 at the end of this section including
those described in Section 3.6.3. See Section 3.0 of this Handbook
for details on preliminary site visits.
3.1 Apparatus Check and Calibration
Previously used equipment should be visually checked for damage
and/or excessive wear before each field test. Items should be
repaired or replaced (as applicable) if judged to be unsuitable for
use. A pretest sampling checks form (Figure 3.1) summarizes equip-
ment calibration. The pretest preparations form (Figure 3.2) can be
used as an equipment check and packing list. The completed form
should be dated, signed by the field crew supervisor, and filed in
the operational log book. The replacement of worn or damaged items
of equipment should be initiated. Procedures for performing the
checks are given herein; a check is placed in the proper row and
column as the check/operation is completed. Each team will have to
construct its own checklist according to the type of sampling train
and equipment it uses.
3.2 Reagents
Unless otherwise indicated, it is intended that all reagents
conform to the specifications establishod by the Committee on
Analytical Reagents of the American Chemical Society (ACS), where
such specifications are available; otherwise, use the best available
grade. See Subsection 1.2.3 of Section 3.14.1 for water specifica-
tions .
3.2.1 Sampling - The absorbing reagent is prepared by adding 2.8 ml
of concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO.) to a 100-ml flask containing
water and diluting to volume witn mixing. Add 10 ml of this
solution, along with 6 ml of 3% hydrogen peroxide (H202) that has
been freshly prepared from a 30 percent solution, to a 1-liter
flask. Dilute to volume with water, and mix well. Prepare fresh
absorbing solution weekly, and avoid exposure to extreme heat or to
direct sunlight, as these will cause the hydrogen peroxide to
decompose. If the reagent must be shipped to the field, it is
advisable that the absorbing reagent be prepared fresh on-site.
3.2.2 Analysis - The following reagents are needed for analysis and
standardization:
-------
Section No. 3.14.3
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
o
Date t- 2,5 f&S Calibrated by _
Flask Volume
Flask volume measured with valves? ^ yes no
Volume measured within 10 ml of actual volume?*
-------
Section No. 3.14.3
Date July 1, 1986
Page 3
Apparatus check
Probe
Glass liner
clean
Heated properly*
Leak checked
Collection Flask
Clean
Leak checked
Temperature
gauge
Evacuation System
Leak- free pumps
Manifold and
tubing
U-tube manometer
Barometer
Reagents
Water
Absorbing solu-
tion*
Sample Recovery
Dropper or burette
Sample bottles
Pipette, 25 ml
Acceptable
Yes
x
^
X
X
x"
X
X
X
X
cX
x'
^
X
X
^
NO
Quantity
required
3
/4
T
2
3
2-
/
/ ///cr
(
/ ///^~
2
14-
' i
Ready
Yes
X
X'
IS^
X
X
X
X
X
^
^r
^x^
No
Loaded
and packed
Yes
^x""
ls^
^
X
X
X"
x
ys"
^
X
^
No
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
Figure 3.2. Pretest preparations.
-------
Section No. 3.14.3
Date July 1, 1986
Page 4
Stock standard solution - Dissolve exactly 1.847 g of dried
sodium nitrate (NaN03)[or 2.198 g of dried potassium nitrate (KN03)]
in water, and dilute to 1 liter in a volumetric flask; mix well.
Prepare fresh after 1 month.
Working standard solution - Dilute 5 ml of the standard solution
to 200 ml with water in a volumetric flask, and mix well. Note; One
ml of the working standard solution is equivalent to 25g of
nitrogen dioxide.
Eluent solution - Weigh 1.018 g of sodium carbonate (NaCOo) and
1.008 g of sodiumbicarbonate (NaHCCU), and dissolve in 4 liters of
water. Other eluents may be used (see Subsection 1.4.3).
o
o
o
I?'
L
-------
Section No. 3-14.3
Date July 1, 1986
Page 5
TABLE 3.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR PRESAMPLING PREPARATION
Characteristic
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Apparatus Check
Probe
1. Clean; glass liner
inert to oxides of
nitrogen
2. Heating properly if
equipped with heating
system
3. Leak free
1. Before each test
2. As above
3. Pressure <380 mm
(15 in.) Hg
Replace
Replace or
repair
Replace or
repair
Collection
flask
Clean; volume within
10 ml
Before each test,
clean with strong de-
tergent and hot tap
water, and rinse with
tap water and then
ASTM Type III water;
periodically clean
with grease remover
Repeat cleans-
ing of flask
and/or meas-
ure volume
Evacuation
system
Vacuum of 75 n™
(3 in.) Hg absolute
pressure in each flask;
leakage rate <10 mm
(0.4 in.) Hg/min
Before each test, check
for leaks using Hg-
filled U-tube manometer
Correct leaks
Absorbing
Reagent
Sulfuric acid
concentrated
Final concentration:
0.28 ml/liter
Prepare fresh absorbing
solution weekly; use
graduated pipette
Make up new
solution
Hydrogen perox-
ide, 3%
6 ml/liter
Water
Deionized distilled
to ASTM specifications
D 1193-82, Type III
Prepare fresh
for each anal-
ysis period
(continued)
-------
Section No. 3-14.3
Date July 1, 1986
Page 6
TABLE 3.1. (continued)
D
Characteristic
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Analytical
Reagents
Stock standard
solution
1. 1.8V7 +0.001 g
NaNOo ACS reagent
grade into a 1-liter
volumetric flask
(Class-A)
2. Stored for less
than 1 month
1. On makeup of solution
use analytical balance
2. Date solution
1. Make up new
solution
2. As above
Working standard
solution
5 ml of stock solution
into 200-ml volumetric
flask (Class-A)
On makeup of solution,
use Class A pipet and
proper technique
As above
Eluent solution
1.018 g + 0.001 g of
NaCO, and 1.008 g
+ 0.002 g of NaHCO-
in 4 liters •*
On makeup of solution,
use analytical balance
As above
o
Packing Equip-
ment for Ship-
ment
Probe
Rigid container lined
with polyethylene foam
Prior to each shipment
Repack
Collection
flasks and
valves
Rigid container lined
with polyethylene foam
As above
As above
Evacuation
system, tem-
perature
gauges,
vacuum lines,
and reagents
Sturdy case lined with
polyethylene foam
As above
As above
Evacuation
pump
Shipping container
or housing designed
for travel
As above
As above
O
-------
Section No. 3.14.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
4.0 ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
The bn-site activities include transporting equipment to the test
site, unpacking and assembling the equipment, confirming duct meas-
urements and traverse points (if volumetric flow rate is to be
determined), determining the molecular weight of the stack gas,
sampling for oxides of nitrogen, and recording the data. These
activities are the same as for Method 7 (Section 3.6.4), with the
exception of a portion of the sample recovery procedures as described
below. Blank data forms can be found in Section 3.14.12 for the
convenience ..of the Handbook user. Table 4.1 at the end of this
section summarizes the quality assurance activities relative to all
on-site measurements in Method 7A, including those described in
Section 3.6.12.
4.1 Sampling
On-site sampling procedures for Method 7A are the same as those
for Method 7. See Subsection 4.3 of Section 3.6.4 for detailed
descriptions of sampling procedures. For convenience, examples of
completed field data forms for Method 7 are reproduced in this
section (Figures 4.1A and 4.IB); blank copies are provided in Section
3.14.12.
4.2 Sample Recovery
Sample recovery procedures should be performed as described for
Method 7 (Section 3.6.4), with the exception that the steps for
checking and adjusting the pH of the sample should be deleted (note
changes in Figures 4.2A, 4.2B, and 4.3).
A 16-hour minimum sample absorption period is required as ±n
Method 7. Samples should be recovered within 4 days of collection.
As currently written, the method states that the samples should be
stored no more.than 4 days between collection and analysis. However,
a recent study utilizing samples from nitric acid plants and power
plants indicates that the storage period - between recovery and
collection may be extended to 30 days.
-------
Plant
Sample location
Operator
QuHt-i, &0 '/•€!-
City
Date
Barometric pressure (P, )
. 84-
in. Hg
Sample
number
M-l
M-Z
Sample
point
location
6-11
L>~ '/O
C-10
Sample
time
24-hr
0733
0745"
Probe
temperature ,
°F
-2-10
2-/0
Flask
and valve
number
£-/3.
££ -10
Volume
of flask
and valve (Vp) ,
ml
2.6/3
ZolO
Initial pressure
in. Hg
Leg A±
73.6
/3.7
73.7
Leg Bi
/3.7
/3.8
737
pia
Z-5-f-
z.3f
Initial temperature
°F(ti)
73
73
°R(Ti)b
^53
5-33
Px = pbar
Ti = fci + 46° F*
O
Figure 4.1A. Nitrogen oxide field data form (English units).
O
•DOW
C> ta 0> rt
K
M Q O
CD
O
H* •
CO
lO h-1
03 it*
O
-------
Plant frc-frvL rower r
Sample location &SS* 0U-/-L
Operator &£>O
l^»+ city C^=flJ^*>^ , /SavT&r><±
'ff- , 250/fer fcl Date Z /E-7 /^ <5T
Barometric pressure (P, ) 7O(p
, 2— mm Hg
Sample
number
M-l
M'Z
A?~3
Sample
point
location
a- it
&-10
c-io
Sample
time
24-hr
0733
074-5-
00oi
Probe
temperature ,
°C
/OO
loo
loo
Flask
and valve
number
££r&
&£'/&
££-%
Volume
of flask
and valve (V.,).
ml
2013.
ZO/0
200®
Initial pressure
in. Hg
Le.g A±
372
373
37Z5-
Leg B±
371
370. $~
370
*ia
17.2.
Jb.7
n.7
Initial temperature
°C (t±)
13..2
ZI.Z.
^3.r
^'(Ti)1*-
2fs: z
2-74 Z
Z'ft.S'
Pi
273°C.
»« O CO
Qj 0) (D
tQ tt Q
(D (D rt-
H-
(*>Q O
C 3
Figure 4.1B. Nitrogen oxide field data form (metric units).
00
vo
03
o\
-------
Plant
Date
Sample recovery personnel cj?. £i&r Barometric pressure, (P, )
Person with direct responsibility for recovered samples /y.
in. Hg
Sample
number
A/7-/
/L/2--7
ni £~
Final pressure,
in. Hg
Leg Af
/•(/
/ 9
2.0
Leg Bf
0-6
ft 9)
pfa
17. W
T ~1 QA.
Final temperature,
°F (tf)
73
72-
73
°R (Tf)b
^"33
5^3 Z
Sample
recovery
time,
24-h
/3ZZ
IB4-0
/f/s"
Liquid
level
marked
^
^
Samples
stored
in locked
container
^
^^
Pf - pbar
460°F-
Lab person with direct responsibility for recovered samples
Date recovered samples received 3/1 /Po . Analyst ^".
All samples identifiable?
Remarks
Uf
fS
All liquids at marked level? ^BS
I
Signature of lab sample trustee
•D O W
W 0) CD
tQ rt- O
CD CD rf
H-
rf^ U O
O
Figure 4.2A. NO sample recovery and integrity data form (English units).
O
vD
03
O
-------
Plant
Date
Sample recovery personnel (y.
Barometric pressure, £/• i£— Ui
Lab person with direct responsibility for recovered samples
Date recovered samples received ^///uo Analyst &.
All samples identifiable?
Remarks
All liquids at marked level?
Signature of lab sample trustee
T.
Figure 4.2B.
sample recovery and integrity data form (metric units)
•a a w
cu o> CD
IQ tt O
(D 0) d-
I-1-
01 Ci O
C D
O
H1 •
N
W
CD »>
-------
Section No. 3.14.4
Date July 1, 1986
Page 6
Sampling ,
Volume of 25 ml of absorbing solution** placed in flask?
Flask valve stopper in purge position?
Sampling train properly assembled?
Leak free?* \/ Stopcock grease used?
Type? £
Flask evacuated to 75 mm (3 in. ) Hg pressure?
Leakage from manometer observation?* _ #, /
[e.g., maximum change in manometer of £ 10 mm (0.4 in.)
Hg/min]
Initial pressure of flask recorded?* __,_
Initial temperature of flask recorded?*
Probe purged before sampling? S
Sample collected properly?*
-------
Section No. 3.14.
Date July 1, 1986
Page 7
Table 4.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
Characteristic
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Apparatus
assembly
Assemble using Fig.
1.1; no leakage
Before sample collec-
tion, visually and
physically inspect all
connections
Check for
leaks; repair
system;
repeat test
Operational
check
Maximum vacuum of
75 mm (3 in.) Hg
absolute pressure
Leakage rate £10 mm
(0.4 in.) Hg/min
Before sample collec-
tion, use Hg-filled
U-tube manometer
As above
Check system
for leaks;
check vacuum
pump
Check all
joints and
valves for
source of leak
Sample
recovery
Shake flask for 5 min
Let flask set for a
minimum of 16 h, but
no more than 4 days
Shake flask for 2 min
Determine flask pres-
sure and temperature
Mark sample level on
container
Record data on data
form (Fig. 4.2)
During each sample
collection, use mano-
meter and Celsius
thermometer
Reject sample,
rerun test
Sample logistics
Properly label all
containers, etc.
Record all data on
field data forms
Visually check each
sample
As above
Complete the
labeling
Complete the
data records
ill-
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.14.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
5.0 POSTSAMPLING OPERATIONS
The postsampling operations include checks oh (a)' the apparatus
used in the field to quantify sample volumes (volume, temperature,
and pressure measurements), and (b) analyses of the samples collected
and forwarded to the base laboratory. If the laboratory receives the
samples in the sample flasks, laboratory personnel will have to com-
plete the sample recovery procedures referred to in Section 3.6.4.
The postsampling checks on the sample collection train are the
same as for Method 7 (Section 3.6.5). The analytical procedures for
Method 7A are different from Method 7 and are discussed below.
Figure 5.1 is a checklist for all Method 7A posttest operations.
Table 5.1 at the end of this section summarizes the quality assurance
activities for all postsampling operations for Method 7A including
those described in Section 3.6.5.
5.1 Analysis (Base Laboratory) •• <,,,-.
Calibration of the ion chromatograph, including preparation of
the calibration standards and preparation of the field samples is of
primary importance to a precise and accurate analysis. For Method
7A, the calibration of the 1C is conducted in conjunction with analy-
sis of the field samples (and quality assurance samples). This
section presents the steps for analysis of the field samples
including preparation of samples, field blanks, and use of quality
assurance samples. The relationship between analysis of the field
samples and preparation of the calibration curve is addressed.
However, because a calibration and performance check of the 1C prior
to conducting any NO analyses is highly recommended, the detailed
discussion of the $C calibration is presented in Section 3.14.2.
Therefore, the analyst should use Section 3.14.2 in association with
this section (3.14.5) in conducting the analysis. In particular, the
analyst is encouraged to review the discussion of pipetting errors
(see Subsection 2.1.4). Upon completion of each step of the
preparation of the calibration curve and of each sample analysis, the
data should be entered on the proper data form.
5.1.1 Preparation of Field Samples - Check the level of the liquid
in the sample container and confirm whether any sample was lost
during shipment; note this on a data form such as that shown in
Figure 5.1. If a noticeable amount of leakage has occurred, either
void the sample or use methods subject to the approval of the
Administrator to correct the final results. Immediately before
analysis prepare each field sample. The following steps detail
sample preparation operations.
1. With the aid of a funnel, transfer the contents of the samp-
ling flask to a 50-ml Class-A volumetric flask.
2. Add approximately a 5-ml portion of water to the sampling
flask, replace the stopcock (ensuring that it is in the
-------
Section No. 3.14.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
o
Reagents
Sodium nitrate dried at 105° to 110°C for a minimum of
2 hours before use?
Stock standard solution (sodium nitrate) less than 1 month old?
Sample Preparation
Has liquid level noticeably changed?* /Vp
Original volume Corrected volume
Analysis
Standard calibration curve prepared?* *
All calibration points within 7 percent of linear calibration
curve?*
Reagent blanks made from absorbing solution? _ .X
Same injection volume for both standards and samples? _ */_
Duplicate sample values agree within 5 percent of their mean?
O
All analytical data recorded on checklist and laboratory form?
* Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
Figure 5.1. Posttest operations.
O
-------
Section No. 3.14.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 3
closed position), and rinse the interior by shaking and
rotating the flask. Transfer the rinse to the volumetric
flask. Repeat the rinse with another 5-ml portion of water,
and add this rinse to the volumetric flask also.
3. Reassemble the sampling flask and place the stopcock in the
closed position to prevent contamination during storage prior
to reuse.
4. Using water, dilute the contents of the volumetric flask to
the mark. Mix the contents of the flask well.
5. Using a 5-ml Class-A pipet, pipet a 5-ml aliquot of the sample
into another 50-ml Class-A volumetric flask. This aliquot is
diluted to the mark with either water or eluent solution. Mix
the contents of the flask well.
The diluent used must be the same as that used for the calibra-
tion standards. (See Subsection 2.1.2 Preparation -of Calibration
Standards.) ,
5.1.2 Preparation of Reagent Blank - The reagent blank is prepared
in essentially the same manner as the field samples. The difference
in procedure occurs at the first step. In preparing the reagent
blank, 25 ml of absorbing reagent is transferred to a 50-ml Class-A
volumetric flask. A 25-ml pipet may be used for measuring and
dispensing the reagent solution; however, the use of a graduated
cylinder will give results of acceptable accuracy and precision.
After introducing the absorbing reagent into the volumetric flask,
add water to the mark, and mix the contents of the flask well. The
remaining steps for preparing the reagent blank, are*; identical., to
those of Step 5 under Preparation of Field Samples^ ~V .-••*• : t r';,r-
' -— --- —'~ " ~~"~—~" - • \~ * "" * —"•'—~~- ~- " *^ ^
The reagent blank is used to adjust the analytical results of the
field samples for matrix effects of the absorbing reagent and the
water. (The sample matrix is simply the medium that contains the
substance to be analyzed, which in this case is nitrate.) Because
ion chromatography involves separation of the ions prior to detection
and quantification, the potential for the sample matrix to interfere
with the analysis is small. For Method 7A, matrix effects can arise
from the presence of (a) nitrate contaminant in either the absorbing
reagent or the water, or (b) a contaminating substance appearing on
the chromatogram at about the same time as the nitrate peak. In
practice, the ion chromatogram should exhibit no significant response
at that point where nitrate should appear. Nevertheless, since data
are adjusted for the reagent blank, quality results can be obtained
even if contamination exists. The presence of contamination,
however, indicates the need for greater quality control in connection
with reagent integrity.
Audit Samples - The quality of analytical
solutions
5.1.3 Quality Assurance
results can be assessed by analyzing nitrate standard
(I
11!
-------
Section No. 3.14.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 4
prepared by an independent laboratory. For such standard solutions,t )
or quality assurance audit samples, the concentrations are known to ^-^
the control agency (the auditor) but are unknown to the analyst.
Subsection 3.3.5 of the Federal Register promulgation of Method
7A (see Section 3.14.10) requires the analysis of quality assurance
audit samples as described in Method 7. This means that when Method
7A is used to demonstrate compliance with an EPA pollutant emission
standard (specified in 40 CFR Part 60), a performance audit must be
conducted on the analytical phase of the method. Nitrate samples in
glass vials must be obtained for this performance audit from the
Quality Assurance Management Office at each EPA Regional Office or
from the responsible enforcement agency. The addresses of the EPA
Regional Quality Assurance Coordinators are shown in Table 5.1 of
Section 3.0.5 of this Handbook.
The concentration of each audit sample measured by the analyst
must agree within 10 percent (relative error) of the actual audit
concentration. The relative error is calculated using the following
equation:
Equation 5-1
RE « Cd " Ca x 100
Ca
where /*~N
C, = Determined audit sample concentration, mg/dscm, and
C = Actual audit sample concentration, mg/dscm.
a
5.1.4 Analysis of Calibration Standards, Reagent Blank, Field
Samples, and Quality Assurance Samples - Field samples should be
recovered within 4 days of sample collection. As currently
written, the method states that the samples should be stored no more
than 4- days between collection and analysis. However, a recent
study utilizing samples from nitric acid plants and power plants
indicates that the storage period between recovery and collection may
be extended to 30 days. Sample analysis using an ion chromatograph
is a straightforward operation provided that the instrument has been
properly set up (see Section 3.14.2). All samples (calibration
standards, reagent blank, field samples, and quality assurance
samples) should be introduced into the ion chromatograph using the
same procedure. Sample introduction involves filling a constant
volume sample loop using a syringe or automatic sampling device.
Sample loops give extremely repeatable injection volumes; however,
the volumes that identify sample loop capacity are not necessarily
accurate. Nevertheless, accurate results can be obtained without
having accurately known sample loop volumes, provided that the same
sample loop is used for injecting field samples and calibration
standards. With this procedure, any inaccuracy in the injectio/"~\
volume is accounted for by the calibration. ( )
-------
. ; Section No. 3.14.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 5
Ion chromatographic analysis of calibration standards, field
samples, reagent blank, and quality assurance samples are performed
in five phases during the same day, alternating between the calibra-
tion standards and unknown samples to account for instrument cali-
bration drift. These phases are shown in the schedule below. When
Method 7A is used to demonstrate compliance with an EPA pollutant
emission standard, the quality assurance audit samples described in
Subsection 5.1.3 must be analyzed with the field samples.
Phase Activity
1 First analysis of all calibration standards.
2 First analysis of all field samples, reagent
blank, and quality assurance samples, if
applicable.
3 Second analysis of all calibration standards.
4 Second analysis of field samples, reagent blank,
and quality assurance samples, if applicable.
5 Third analysis of all calibration standards.
The calibration standards are analyzed in triplicate; the field
samples, reagent blank, and quality assurance samples in duplicate.
Replication of analyses increases the accuracy and precision of the
results. Each chromatogram obtained from the analysis should be
documented with the following information:
o sample identification,
o injection point,
o injection volume,
o nitrate retention time,
o sulfate retention time,
o eluent flow rate,
o detector sensitivity setting, and
c recorder chart speed.
Figure 5.2 shows an example chromatogram having acceptable documen-
tation. The injection volume, eluent flow rate, detector sensitivity
setting, and the recorder chart speed need to be documented only once
for the series of chromatograms if these analytical parameters remain
constant over the course of the Method 7A analysis.
Retention time is the elapsed time between when the sample is
introduced into the ion chromatograph and when the peak of interest
-------
Section No. 3.14.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 6
o
Field Sample: AP-1
Chart Speed: 1 cm/min
Flow Rate: 1.5 ml/min
Detector: 30 yS full sca
Injection: 50 ui )
N03 3.3 minutes
Inject
Figure 5.2. Example of chromatogram having adequate documentation.
O
-------
Section No. 3.14.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 7
occurs. Peaks on the chromatogram may be qualitatively identified by
retention time. Retention times can be easily computed from chroma-
tograms provided that the injection point is indicated clearly and
the chart speed is known. Identification of the injection point is
necessary because a chromatogram's trace will not show when injection
occurred.
Record the results for the calibration standards, the field
samples, and reagent blank on the appropriate analytical data form
(Figures 5.3 and 5.4, respectively). As discussed in Subsection
2.1.3 and shown in Figure 5.3, the percent deviation from the cali-
bration curve of the average response value for each calibration
standard must be calculated and must be within 7 percent. A detailed
discussion of preparation of the calibration curve and calculation of
the calibration factor (S) is found in 3.14.2. The example data in
Figure 5.3 shows the use of linear regression to calculate S and a
non-zero intercept; the example data in Figure 2.3 shows calculation
of S with a zero intercept using least squares. Equation 2-1 or 2-4
along with Equation 2-2 (repeated below) are used -to calculate the
percent deviation using either a zero intercept (Eq. 2-1) or a
non-zero intercept (Eq. 2-4).
Equation 2-1
ug NO2 = S (ug/mm) x Detector (mm)
Predicted Response
H
Equation 2-4
ug N02 = S (ug/mm) /Detector (mm) - I
Predicted I Response
v H
')
Equation 2-2
Deviation = pg NO2 Predicted - ug NO2 Standard x 1QQ%
(%) ug N02 Standard
For the analyses of the field samples, average the two response
values .of each sample (see Figure 5.4). The calculated average
should have units consistent with those of the calibration curve, for
example, units of peak height, peak area, etc. The pair of response
values for each sample must each agree within 5 percent of their mean
for the analysis to be valid. For this computation, the following
equation is used:
Equation 5-2
Deviation (%) = Instrument Response - Mean Response x 10Q%
Mean Response
-------
Plant
Date
r
I,
Was an integrator used? S yes no
Location
Analyst
Section No. 3-14.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 8
o
Was the intercept (I) used for calculat
ions? * yes no
Were all points within 7 percent of calculated value? S yes
Sample
Identifier
Std 1
Std 2
Std 3
Std 4
Std 5
Sample
Mass
(Vg NO,)
25
50
100
150
250
Integrator Response
or Peak Height (mm)
H
1
£.3
74.3
2£'5"
30.0
5"M
2
0.4
74.4
26. Z
Vf.O
GO.O
3
#4
t4.z
26.?
37.3
6/jT
Avg
6.3^
74.30
2-6. 53
36-77-
bO.W
Predicted
Sample Mass
23 30
•4&.&I
101-4-1-
/34>o(p
247. fo
no
Deviation
-£.6
--Z..4-
1-1.4-
i-Z.7
- l.v
Predicted Sample Mass using Least Squares to Calculate Calibration Factor (S)
with Zero Intercept
S = S1H1
Hl2*
*? - '
* S2H2 + S3H3 + S4H4 + S5H5
H2 + H2 + H2 + R2
)( ) + ( )( ) + ( )( ) * ( )( ) + ( )( C
222??
( r + ( )^ + ( )^ + ( r + ( )2
S =
yg N0_/mm
Predicted Sample Mass (yg N0?)
yg N02 = H x S = { ) x (
Equation 2-1
Predicted Sample Mass using Linear Regression to Calculate Calibration Factor (S)
and Non-Zero Intercept (I)
y = mx + b; m =
x = - (y - b); i = S =
m m
_; b = JL.?5V6 ;
-^— = 4.30/3 ;
y = H; and b = I (Intercept) =
Predicted Sample Mass ('yg N0_)
yg N02 = S(H - I)
yg N02 at 25 yg standard = 4.30/( &
Equation 2-4
Figure 5'3- Analytical data form for analysis of calibration standards^
D
-------
Section No. 3.14.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 9
5
Date samples received 3 // 705"" Date samples analyzed
Plant /fc>Au /^tVgK" rle>*>J- _ Run number(s) AP-^ 2; 5. 4^
Location
Calibration factor (S)
Reagent blank values:
1st,
Analyst
Intercept (I), if applicable
0 2nd, ^-^) Avg
> f 6
Field
Sample
Number
4f-|
4/-Z
)
Analysis
Number
/sf
j^L
Instrument
Response
(mm)
28.7
23.7
Mean
Instrument
Response
(mm)
2f.sr
Percent
Deviation
(Vg N02)
Z.2.
Mean
Instrument
Response
Blank
Corrected
(H)
Z1.55-
13. /
Dilution
Factor
(F)
,
Mass of
Field
Sample
(yg N02)
//4.4
Deviation of two samples, (#) = 100 x 1 " 21. (must be less than
= 100
Mass of field sample
without intercept
(VS N0)
Mass of field sample
with intercept
a S x H x F
= X X =
= S (H - I) F
Figure 5.4. Analytical data form for analysis of field samples.
-------
Section No. 3.14.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 10 x~x
The reagent blank is analyzed at the same time as the field sam-5"—'
pies. The average blank corrected instrument response (H) is deter-
mined by subtracting the blank value from the average instrument
response for each sample. The blank corrected instrument response
(H), the dilution factor (F), and the calibration factor (S) [with
intercept (I) if necessary] are then used to calculate the mass
of N00 per sample as shown in Figure 5.4.
o
o
-------
Section 3.14.5
Date July 1, 1986
Page 11
Table 5.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Characteristic
Calibration
standards
Acceptance Limits
Data points for cali-
bration standards must
not deviate from the
linear calibration
curve by more than
Frequency and method
of measurement
Conduct for all analy-
ses of field samples
and calibration stan-
dards
Action if
requirements
are not met
Remake and reana-
lyze standards for
data points that
do not meet cri-
teria; interpret
data using another
technique (e.g.
peak area instead
of peak height);
strictly observe
.pipetting tech-
nique; use cali-
bration factor
with y-intercept
for calculations;
calibrate conduc-
tivity detector
Field sample
Results from dupli-
cate analyses must
be within 5 percent
of mean value
Conduct for all
analyses of field
samples
No results exceeding
value for calibration
standard having larg-
est concentration
Applicable to all
analyses of field
samples; determined
by visual inspection
Repeat duplicate
analysis, and
strictly observe
correct pipetting
technique; seek
assistance with
analytical tech-
nique
Dilute blank and
and affected field
sample with equal
volumes of water
and repeat analy-
ses of both
Performance
audit of
analytical
phase
See Section 3.14.8
See Section 3.14.8
See Section 3.14.8
Data
recording
All pertinent data
recorded on Figs. 5-If
5.2, 5-3, and 5.4
Visually check
Supply missing
data
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.14.6
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
6.0 CALCULATIONS
Calculation errors due to procedural or mathematical mistakes can
be a large component of total system error. Therefore, it is recom-
mended that each set of calculations be repeated or spot-checked,
preferably by a team member other than the one who performed the
original calculations. If a difference greater than typical round-
off error is detected, the calculations should be checked step-by-
step until the source of error is found and corrected. A computer
program is advantageous in reducing calculation errors. If a
standardized computer program is used, the original data entry should
be checked, and if differences are observed, a new computer run
should be made. Table 6.1 at the end of this section summarizes the
quality assurance activities for calculations.
Calculations should be carried out at least one extra decimal
figure beyond that of the acquired data, and should be rounded after-
final calculation to two significant digits for each run or sample.
All rounding of numbers should be performed in accordance with the
ASTM 380-76 procedures. All calculations are then recorded on a form
such as the one in Figure 6.1A.
6.1 Nomenclature
The following nomenclature is used in the calculations:
P- = final absolute pressure of flask, mm (in.) Hg,
P. = initial absolute pressure of flask, mm (in.) Hg,
Pstd = s-tandard absolute pressure, 760 mm (29.92 in.) Hg,
Tf = final absolute temperature of flask, °K (°R),
T. = initial absolute temperature of flask, °K (°R),
Tstd = standard absolute temperature, 293°K (528°R),
V = sample volume at standard conditions, dry basis, ml,
SO
Vf =! volume of flask and valve, ml,
V_ = volume of absorbing solution, 25 ml,
cl
H = sample peak height or area (blank should be subtracted
out), mm,
F = dilution factor (required only if additional sample
dilution was needed to reduce the concentration into
the range of calibration),
C = sample concentration of NO as N00, mg/dscm,
. X £t
-------
Section No. 3.14.6
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
S = calibration factor, u g/mm, and
I = intercept term from calibration equation, mm.
6.2 Calculations
The following four Subsections outline the procedures for calcu-
lating the concentration of nitrogen oxides in samples. Subsection
6.2.1 presents the equation for calculating the sample volume on a
dry basis at standard conditions.
Subsection 6.2.2 presents the equation for calculating the sample
concentration of nitrogen oxides as it appears in Method 7A. This
equation utilizes tho calibration factor, S, determined during the
calibration of the ion chromatograph (see Subsection 2.1.3 of Section
3.14.2). Subsection 6.2.3 offers an alternative approach acceptable
to the Administrator for calculating the sample concentration of
nitrogen oxides' utilizing the calibration factor, S, and the inter-
cept term, I, from the calibration equation. This equation is
determined following the procedures outlined in Method 7D for
calibration of the ion chromatograph (see Subsection 2.1.3 of Section
3.14.2).
o
Subsection 6.2.4 presents a simple equation for converting sample
concentration to parts per million. Examples of nitrogen oxide
calculation forms are presented at the end of each section and should
be used with the appropriate calculation methodology.
6.2.1 Sample Volume - Calculate the sample volume on a dry basis at
standard conditions [760 mm (29.92 in.) Hg and 293 K (528 R)] by
using the following equation.
T rv - v ^ /P P v Equation 6-1
Ve^ = *stdtvf va; I If. _ _1 »
P \ T T
*std W Ai
= Ki(Vf - 25 ml) /Pf _ ^1
where
°K
K. = 0.3858 —- for metric units, or
mm Hg
K. - 17.64 °R for English units.
in. Hg
6.2.2 Sample Concentration Using the Calibration Factor, S - Calcu-
late the sample concentration on a dry basis at standardconditions
using the calibration factor, S, as shown in Equation 6-2 when the
calibration factor S was calculated with no intercept. See Figures
O
O
-------
Section No. 3.14.6
Date July 1, 1986
Page 3
6.1A and 6.IB for examples of calculation forms for English and
metric units, respectively.
Equation 6-2
c _ HSF x 104
where
Vsc
4
10 =1:10 dilution times conversion factors of
mg 106 ml
6.2.3 Sample Concentration Using the Calibration Equation and
Factor, S - Calculate the sample concentration on a dry basis at
standard conditions using the calibration factor and the intercept
term for the calibration equation as shown in Equation 6-3. See
Figures 6.1A and 6. IB for examples of calculation forms for English
and metric units, respectively.
_ K (H-I) SF x 104 Equation 6-3
2~^
where
K2 = 1 for metric units, or
K9 = 6.243 x 10~8 dscm/mg for English units.
dscf/lb
4
10 =1:10 dilution times conversion factors of
mg 10 ml
3 3
10 yg m .
6.2.4 Sample Concentration in Parts-Per-Million - If desired, the
concentration of NO2 may be calculated as ppm N02 at standard
conditions using Equation 6-4 as shown below.
Equation 6-4
ppm
where
K3 = 0.5228 — ppm N°2 - for metric units, or
mg N02/dscm
« = 8.375 x 106 - PPm NO2 - fQr English units
Ibs NO2/dscf
llM
-------
Section No. 3.14.6
Date July 1, 1986
Page 4
Sample Volume
Vf = 2-Oi 3 ml, Pf = 2-7 . (ff 4 in. Hg, Tf = <>5_3_ °R
P. = 0 . 5" 7 in. Hg, T. = 5 32.. °R
i — — — ->- i — — —
/P P \ ,-»/?* Equation 6-1
V = 17.64 (V. - 25) / f i 1 = / 7 0 0 ml
sc ±
) /ff _
\Tf TJL
Sample Concentration
(No Intercept Used)
H = . mm, S = _ yg/mm,
F = , V = ml ,
Equation 6-2
— R HCTT v TO — R
C = 6.243 x 10 ° "ar x -1" = . x 10 Ibs N00/dscf
V 2
sc
(With Intercept Used)
H = 2-3 . j_ 0_ mm, I = _ Z-. ^^Tmm, S = T-3^ ]_ ug/mm,
F = _ 1-0, Vsc = _/7 ^ 0 ml
- . . Equation 6-3
4
C = 6.243 x 10"8 (H"I)SF x 10 = _ 3 . 0 f x 10~5 Ibs N0,/dscf
Vsc
Sample Concentration in ppm
,. Equation 6-4
ppm NO,, = 8.375 x 10 C = 2- 5" 5~ppm N00
^/ —. — — ^/
Figure 6.1A. Nitrogen oxide calculation form (English units)
•o
-------
Section No. 3.14.6
Date July 1, 1986
Page 5
V
sc
Sample Volume
J-2 L 2 ml, Pf = 7 0 t. Q mm Hg, Tf = 2- j_
_ ]_ *$_. Q_ mm Hg, T± = _2-f 5_. 5"°K
/p p v _
0.3858 (V. - 25) / f i 1 = / 7 £ S . ml
" ---
. L °K
Equation 6-1
Sample Concentration
(No Intercept Used)
H = _ _. _ _ mm, S = _ _ _ _ v g/mm
F = _ _ . vsc = ml
O w
c =
HSF x 10'
sc
x 10 mg NO0/dscm
(With Intercept Used)
F - A 0. v_ = / 7
Equation 6-2
' s = 4.$ 0 ]_ yg/mm,
ml
Equation 6-3
= (H-I)SF x
Vsc
= ^ • Z .!•? _ x 10 m9 N02/dscm
Sample Concentration in ppm
Equation 6-4
ppm N00 = 0.5228 C = 2- ppm N0
— — — —
Figure 6.IB. Nitrogen oxide calculation form (metric units).
-------
Section No. 3.14.6
Date July 1, 1986
Page 6
Table 6.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR CALCULATIONS
o
Characteristics
Sample volume
calculation
Sample mass
calculation
Sample concen-
tration
Calculation
check
Document and
report re-
sults
Acceptance limits
All data available;
calculations correct
within round-off error
As above
As above
Original and checked
calculations agree
within round-off error
All data available;
calculations correct
within round-off error
Frequency and method
of measurement
For each sample, exam-
ine the data form
As above
As above
For each sample, per-
form independent cal-
culation using data on
Figs. 4.1, 4.2, and
4.3
For each sample, exam-
ine the data form
Action if
requirements
are not met
Complete the
data, or void
the sample
As above
As above
Check and
correct all
data
Complete the (
data, or void ^^
the sample
O
-------
Section No. 3.14.7
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
MAINTENANCE
The normal use of emission-testing equipment subjects it to cor-
rosive gases, extremes in temperature, vibration, and shock. Keeping
the equipment in good operating order over an extended period of time
requires knowledge of the equipment and a routine maintenance program
which should be performed quarterly or upon improper functioning of
the apparatus. As for Method 7, it is suggested that the vacuum pump
be disassembled and cleaned yearly. A summary of the components with
maintenance procedures is presented in Table 7.1 at the end of this
section. These 'procedures are not required, but are recommended to
increase the reliability of the equipment.
7.1 Pumps
Several types of pumps are used in the present commercial samp-
ling trains. The two most common are the fiber vane pump with
in-line oiler and the diaphragm pump. The fiber vane pump requires a
periodic check of the oiler jar. The oil should be translucent.
During the yearly disassembly or if the fiber vane pump starts to run
erratically, the head should be removed and the fiber vanes changed.
The diaphragm pump will show a leak when the diaphragm needs
changing. If the diaphragm pump runs erratically, it is usually due
to a bad diaphragm (causing leakage) or to malfunctions in the
valves. The valves should be cleaned annually by complete
.disassembly of the pump.
7.2 Shipping Containers
Since the majority of the sampling train is glassware, the ship-
ping containers are very important for protection and safety. All
shipping containers should be inspected quarterly for their
condition, and repaired or modified to assure the safety of the
equipment.
7.3 Ion Chromatograph
Maintenance activities and schedules for ion chromatographs are
make and model specific. It is therefore recommended that the
analyst consult the operator's manual for instructions relative to
maintenance practices and procedures.
Guard columns, while not required, are recommended £gr use with
the ion chromatograph in order to extend column lifetime.
-------
Section No. 3-14.7
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
o
Table 7.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR MAINTENANCE
Apparatus
Fiber vane pump
Diaphragm pump
Shipping con-
tainer
Ion chrom-
atograph
Acceptance criteria
Oil translucent; pump
leakless and capable
of pulling a vacuum of
less than 75 mm (3
in. ) Hg absolute
pressure
Leak free, valves
functioning properly,
and capable of pulling
a vacuum of < 75 mm
(3 in. ) Hg absolute
pressure
Protect equipment from
damage
See owner's manual
Frequency and method
of measurement
Check oiler jar
periodically; remove
head and change fiber
vanes
Clean valves during
disassembly; replace
diaphragm as needed
Inspect quarterly;
repair as needed
See owner's manual
Action if
requirements
are not met
Replace as
needed
Replace when
leaking or mal-
functioning
Replace f
See owner's
manual
O
-------
Section No. 3.14.8
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
8.0 AUDITING PROCEDURE
An audit is an independent assessment of data quality. Indepen-
dence is achieved if the individual(s) performing the audit and their
standards and equipment are different from the regular field team and
their standards and equipment. Routine quality assurance checks by a
field team are necessary to generate good quality data, but they are
not part of the auditing procedure. Table 8.1 at the end of this
section summarizes the quality assurance functions for auditing.
19 20 21
Based on the results of collaborative tests ' ' of Method 7,
two specific performance audits are recommended:
1. Audit of the analytical phase of Method 7A.
2. Audit of data processing.
It is suggested that a systems audit be conducted as specified by the
quality assurance coordinator, in addition to these performance
audits. The two performance audits and the systems audit are
described in detail in Subsections 8.1 and 8.2, respectively.
8.1 Performance Audits
Performance audits are made to evaluate quantitatively the qual-
ity of data produced by the total measurement system (sample collecj-
tion, sample analysis, and data processing). It is recommended that
these audits be performed by the responsible control agency once
during every enforcement source test. A source test for enforcement
comprises a series of runs at one,.source. The performance audit pf
the analytical phase is subdivided into two steps: (1) a pretest
audit which is optional, and (2) an audit during the field sampling
and/or analysis phase which is required. No audit is recommended at
this time for the sample collection phase. .-i:"v"
8.1.1 Pretest Audit of Analytical Phase (Optional) - The pretest
audit described in this section can be used to determine the pro-
ficiency of. the analyst, the quality of the standard solutions in
the Method 7A analysis, and the ability to perform the computations
correctly. It should be performed at the discretion of the agency
auditor, the laboratory supervisor, source test company, or quality
assurance officer. The analytical phase of Method 7A can be audited
with the use of aqueous potassium or sodium nitrate samples. Aqueous
sodium nitrate samples may be prepared using the same procedure
described in Section 3.14.2 for calibration standard preparation.
The pretest audit provides the opportunity for the testing
laboratory to check the accuracy of its analytical procedure. This
audit is especially recommended for a laboratory with little or no
experience with the Method 7A analysis procedure described in this
Handbook.
As an alternative to preparing their own audit samples for a
pretest audit, a testing laboratory may, 30 days prior to the time of
-------
Section No. 3.14.8
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
the planned pretest audit, make a request to EPA's Environmental( )
Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Quality Assurance Division, Source^—-/
Branch, Mail Drop 77A, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
for known quality control samples. These samples are aqueous
potassium nitrate samples (and not sodium nitrate samples).
The relative error for each of two samples should be within 10
percent of true value. The relative error (RE) is an indication of
the bias that may be associated with the analytical phase of Method
7A. Calculate RE using Equation 8-1.
RE = Cd " Ca x 100
Ca
Equation 8-1
where
C, = Determined audit sample concentration, mg/dscm, and
C = Actual audit sample concentration, mg/dscm.
a
8.1.2 Audit of Analytical Phase of the Field Test (Required) - As
stated in Sections 3.3.9 and 4.4 of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 7
(49 FR 26522, 06/27/84), when the method is used for enforcement
testing, the analyst must analyze two audit samples along with thp"~N
field samples. The testing laboratory should notify the responl j
sible agency requiring the performance test of the intent to test ar""*'^
least 30 days prior to the enforcement source test. The responsible
agency will provide two audit samples to be analyzed along with the
field samples from the enforcement source test. The purpose of this
audit is to assess the data quality at the time of the analysis. If
EPA is the agency requiring the performance test, the testing
laboratory should notify the Quality Assurance Management Office in
the respective EPA Regional Office. The addresses of the EPA
Regional Quality Assurance Coordinators are shown in Table 5.1 of
Section 3.0.5 of this Handbook.
The two audit samples and the compliance samples must be concur-
rently analyzed in the same manner to evaluate the technique of the
analyst, the standards preparation, and computation skills. (Note:
It is recommended that known quality control samples be analyzed
prior to the compliance and audit sample analysis to indicate any
problems. One source of these samples is the Source Branch listed in
Subsection 8.I.T.) The same analyst, analytical reagents, and
analytical system shall be used both for compliance samples and the
EPA audit samples; if this condition is met, auditing of subsequent
compliance analyses for the same enforcement agency within 30 days
may not be required. An audit sample set may not be used to validate
different sets of compliance samples under the jurisdiction of
different enforcement agencies, unless prior;arrangements are made
with both enforcement agencies.
o
-------
Section No. 3.14.8
Date July 1, 1986
Page 3
Calculate the concentrations in mg/dscm using the specified
sample volume in the audit instructions. (Note: Indication of
acceptable results may be obtained immediately by reporting the audit
results in mg/dscm and compliance results in total mg N02/sample by
telephone to the responsible enforcement agency.) Include the
results of both audit samples, their identification numbers, and the
analyst's name - with the results of the compliance determination
samples in appropriate reports to the EPA Regional Office or the
appropriate enforcement agency. Include this information with
subsequent compliance analyses for the same enforcement agency during
the 30-day period.
The concentration of each audit sample measured by the analyst
shall agree within 10 percent of the actual concentration. If the
10-percent specification is not met, reanalyze the compliance samples
and audit samples, and include initial and reanalysis values in the
test report.
Failure to meet the 10-percent specification may require retests
until the audit problems are resolved. However, if the audit results
do not affect the compliance or noncompliance status of the affected
facility, the Administrator may waive the reanalysis requirement,
further audits, or retests and accept the results of the compliance
test. While steps are being taken to resolve audit analysis prob-
lems, the Administrator may also choose to use the data to determine
the compliance or noncompliance status of the affected facility.
Other applications of Method 7A (i.e., Performance Specification
Tests) should follow agency recommended or required procedures.
8.1.3 Audit.QfgDa^a Processing - Calculation errors are prevalent
in Method 7.-LJ'-u> ~xData processing errors can be determined by
auditing the recorded data on the field and laboratory forms. The
original and audit (check) calculations should agree within round-off
error; if not, all of the remaining data should be checked. The data
processing may also be audited by providing the testing laboratory
with specific data sets (exactly as would appear in the field), and
by requesting that the data calculation be completed and that the
results be returned to the agency/organization. This audit is useful
in checking both computer programs and manual methods of data
processing.
8.2 Systems Audit
A systems audit is an on-site qualitative inspection and review
of the total measurement system (sample collection, sample analysis,
etc.). Initially, a systems audit is recommended for each enforce-
ment source test, defined here as a series of three runs at one
source. After the test team gains experience with the method, the
frequency of audit may be reduced—for example, to once for every
four tests.
The auditor should have extensive background experience in
source sampling, specifically with the measurement system being
audited. The functions of the auditor are summarized below:
r;
-------
- . Section No. 3.14.8
Date July 1, 1986
Page 4
1. Inform the testing team of the results of pretest audits,
specifying any area(s) that need special attention or improvement.
2. Observe procedures and techniques of the field team during
sample collection.
3. Check/verify records of apparatus calibration checks and
quality control used in the laboratory analysis of control samples
from previous source tests, where applicable.
4. Record the results of the audit, and forward them with
comments to the team management so that appropriate corrective action
may be initiated.
While on site, the auditor observes the source test team's
overall performance, including the following specific operations:
1. Setting up and leak testing the sampling train.
2. Preparing the absorbing solution (if performed on-site) and
adding it to the collection flasks.
3. Collecting the sample.
4. Sample absorption procedures, sample recovery, and
preparation of samples for shipment.
Figure 8.1 is a suggested checklist for the auditor.
o
o
r'f
-------
Section No. 3.14.8
Date July 1, 1986
Page 5
Yes
No
Comment
Presampling preparation
1. Plant operation parameters variation
2. Calibration of the flask and valve volume three
determinations
3. Absorbing reagent preparation
5.
On-site measurements
Leak testing of sampling train
Preparation and introduction of absorbing solution
into sampling flask
Postsampling
(Analysis and Calculation)
6. Control sample analysis
7. Sample aliquotting techniques
8. Ion chromatographic technique
a. Preparation of standard nitrate samples
(pipetting)
b. Calibration factor (+^ 7 percent for all
standards)
c. Duplicate sample values within 5 percent
of their mean
d. Adequate peak separation
9. Audit results (+ 10%)
a. Use of computer program
b. Independent check of calculations
Comments
Figure 8.1. Method 7A checklist to be used by auditors,
-------
Section No. 3.14.8
Date July 1, 1986
Page 6
Table 8.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR AUDITING PROCEDURE
o
Audit
Acceptance Limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Performance
audit of
analytical
phase
Measured RE of the
audit samples shall
be within 102 for
both audit results
Frequency; Once during
every enforcement source
test*
Method; Measure QA sam-
ples and report values
to responsible agency
Review operating
technique and/or
calibration check
Data
processing
errors
Original and checked
calculations agree
within round-off
error
Frequency; Once during
every enforcement
source test
Method; Independent
calculations starting
with recorded data on
Figures 4.1 and 5-1
Check and correct
all data for the
audit period rep-
resented by the
sampled data
Systems
audit-
observance
of tech-
nique
Operational tech-
nique as described
in this section of
the Handbook
Frequency; Once during
every enforcement source
test until experience
gained, then every
fourth test
Method; Observation of
techniques assisted by
audit checklist,
Fig. 8.1
Explain to team
their deviation
from recommended
techniques, and
note on Fig. 8.1
D
*As defined here, a source test for enforcement of the NSPS comprises a series
of runs at one source. Source tests for purposes other than enforcement (e.g.,
a research project) may be audited at a lower frequency.
O
-------
Section No. 3.14.9
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
9.0 RECOMMENDED STANDARDS FOR ESTABLISHING TRACEABILITY
To achieve data of desired quality, two essential considerations
are necessary: (1) the measurement process must be in a state of
statistical control at the time of the measurement, and (2) the
systematic errors, when combined with the random variation (errors or
measurement), must result in an acceptable uncertainty. As evidence
in support of good quality data, it is necessary to perform quality
control checks and independent audits of the measurement process; to
document these data; and to use materials, instruments, and measure-
ment procedures that can be traced to an appropriate standard of
reference.
Data must be routinely obtained by repeat measurements of stan-
dard reference samples (primary, secondary, and/or working standards)
and the establishment of a condition of process control. The working
calibration standards should be traceable to standards of higher
accuracy.
Class-S weights (made to NBS specifications) are recommended for
the analytical balance calibration. See Section 3.6.2 for details on
balance calibration checks.
Class-A volumetric flasks and pipets (made to NBS specifications)
should be used in the preparation and transfer of solutions.
Audit samples (as discussed in Section 3.14.8) must be used to
validate test results for compliance determination purposes and are
recommended as an independent check on the measurement process when
the method is performed for other purposes.
(I
-------
o
o
o
-------
10.0 REFERENCE METHOD*
Section No. 3.14.10
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
METHOD 7A—DETERMINATION or NITROGEN
OXIDE EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY
SOURCES—ION CHROMATOORAPHIC METHOD
1. Applicability and Principle.
1.1 Applicability. This method applies to
the measurement of nitrogen oxides emitted
from stationary sources: it may be used as
an alternative to Method 7 (as defined In 40
CFR Pan 60.8(b)) to determine compliance
If the stack concentration Is within the ana-
lytical range. The analytical ranee of the
method is from 125 to 1.230 mg NO./m1 as
NOi (65 to 655 ppm). and higher concentra-
tions may be analyzed by diluting the
sample. The lower detection limit Is ap-
proximately 19 mg/m' (10 ppm). but may
vary among instruments.
1.2 Principle. A grab sample is collected
in an evacuated flask containing a diluted
'sulfuric acid-hydrogen peroxide absorbing
solution. The nitrogen oxides, except ni-
trous oxide, are oxidized to nitrate and
measured by ion chromatography.
2. Apparatus.
2.1 Sampling. Same as In Method 7, Sec-
tion 2.1.
2.2 Sampling Recovery. Same as In
Method 7. Section 2.2. except the stirring
rod and pH paper are not needed.
2.3 Analysis. For the analysis, the follow-
ing equipment is needed. Alternative Instru-
mentation and procedures will be allowed
provided the calibration precision In Section
5.2 and acceptable audit accuracy can be
met.
2.3.1 Volumetric Pipets. Class A: 1-. 2-, 4-.
5-ml (two for the set of standards and one
per sample). 6-, 10-, and graduated 5-ml
sizes.
2.3.2 Volumetric Flasks. 50-ml (two per
sample and one per standard). 200-ml. and
1-llter sizes.
2.3.3 Analytical Balance. To measure to
within 0.1 mg.
2.3.4 Ion Chromatograph. The ion chro-
matograph should have at least the follow-
ing components:
2.3.4.1 Columns. An artion separation or
other column capable of resolving the ni-
trate ion from sulfate and other species
present and a, standard anion suppressor
column (optional). Suppressor columns are
produced as proprietary items: however, one
can be produced in the laboratory using the
resin available from BioRad Company. 32nd
and Griffin Streets. Richmond. California.
2.3.4.2 Purap. Capable of maintaining a
steady flow as required by the system.
2.3.4.3 Flow Gauges. Capable of measur-
ing the specified system flow rate.
2.3.4.4 Conductivity Detector.
2.3.4.5 Recorder. Compatible with the
output voltage range of the detector.
3. Reagents.
Unless otherwise indicated. It is Intended
that all reagents conform to the specifica-
tions established by the commit^* on Ana-
lytical Reagents of the American Chemical
Society, where such specifications are avail-
able: otherwise, use the best available grade.
3.1 Sampling. An absorbing solution con-
sisting of suliuric acid (HiSO.) and hydro-
gen peroxide (ffiOi) is required for sam-
pling. To prepare the absorbing solution, i
cautiously add 2.8 ml concentrated H.SO. to
a 100-ml flask containing water (same as
Section 3.2), and dilute to volume with
mixing. Add 10 ml of this solution, along
with 6 ml of 3 percent HiOi that has been
freshly prepared from 30 percent solution.
to a 1-liter flask. Dilute to volume with
water and mix well. This absorbing solution
should b« used within 1 week of Its prepara-
tion. Do not expose to extreme heat or
direct sunlight.
3.2 Sample Recovery. Deionized distilled
water that conforms to American Society
for Testing and Materials specification D
1193-74. Type 3. is required for sample re-
covery. At the option of the analyst, the
KMnO. test for oxidizable organic matter
may be omitted when high concentrations
of organic matter are not expected to b«
present.
3.3 Analysis. For the analysis, the follow-
ing reagents are required:
3.3.1 Water. Same as In Section 3.2.
3.3.2 Stock Standard Solution. 1 mg NO,/
ml. Dry an adequate amount of sodium ni-
trate (NaNO.) at 105 to 110'C for a mini-
mum of 2 hours just before preparing the
standard solution. Then dissolve exactly
1.847 g of dried NaNO, In water, and dilute
to 1 liter in a volumetric flask. Mix well.
This solution Is stable for 1 month and
st.ould not be used beyond this time.
3.3.3 Working Standard Solution. 25 n«/
ml. Dilute 5 ml of the standard solution to
200 ml with water In a volumetric flask, and
mix well. •
3.3.4 Eluent Solution. Weight 1.018 g of
sodium carbonate (Na»CO>) and 1.008 g of
sodium bicarbonate (NaHCOj). and dissolve
In 4 liters of water. This solution is 0.0024 M
NatCOi/0.003 M NaHCO, Other eluents ap-
propriate to the column type and capable of
resolving nitrate ion from sulfate and other
species present may be used.
3.35 Quality Assurance Audit Samples.
Same as required in Method 7.
4. Procedure.
4.1 Sampling. Same as In Method 7. Sec-
tion 4.1.
4.2 Sample. Recovery. Same as In
Method 7, Section 4.2, except delete the
steps on adjusting and checking the pE of
the sample. Do not store the samples more
than 4 days between collection and analysis.
Federal Register, Volume 48, No. 237, December 8, 1983.
,77/3
-------
4.3 Sample. Preparation. Note the level
of the liquid In the container and confirm
whether any sample was lost during ship-
ment; note this on the analytical data sheet.
If a noticeable amount of leakage has oc-
curred, either void the sample or use meth-
ods, subject to the approval of the Adminis-
trator, to correct the final results. Immedi-
ately before analysis, transfer the contents
of the shipping container to a 50-ml volu-
metric flask, and rinse the container twice
with 5-ml portions of water. Add the rinse
water to the flask, and dilute to the mark
with water. Mix thoroughly.
Pipe: a 5-ml aliquot of the sample Into a
50-ml volumetric flask, and dilute to the
mark with water. Mix thoroughly. For each
set of determinations, prepare a reagent
blank by diluting 5 ml of absorbing solution
to 50 ml with water. (Alternatively, eluent
solution may be used in all sample, stand-
ard, and blank dilutions.)
4.4 Analysis. Prepare a standard calibra-
tion curve according to Section 5.2. Analyze
the set of standards followed by the set of
samples using the same injection volume for
both standards and samples. Repeat this
analysis sequence followed by a final analy-
sis of the standard set. Average the results.
The two sample values must agree within 5
percent of their mean for the anlaysls to be
valid. Perform this duplicate analysis se-
quence on the tame day. Dilute any sample
and the blank with equal volumes of water
if the concentration exceeds that of the
highest standard.
Document each sample chromatogram by
listing the following analytical parameters:
injection point, injection volume, nitrate
and tulfate retention times, flow rate, detec-
tor sensitivity setting, and recorder chart
speed.
4.5 Audit Analysis. Same as required in
Method 7.
5. Calibration.
5.1 Flask Volume. Same as In Method 7,
Section 5.1.
5.2 Standard Calibration Curve. Prepare
a series of five standards by adding 1.0. 2.0,
4.0. 6.0. and 10.0 ml of working standard so-
lution (25 MC/rol) to a series of five 50-ml
volumetric flasks. (The standard masses will
equal 25. 50. 100. 150, and 250 us.) Dilute
each flask to volume with water, and mix
well. Analyze with the samples as described
In Section 4.4 and subtract the blank from
each value. Prepare or calculate a linear re-
gression plot to the standard masses in >ig
(x-axis> versus their peak height responses
in millimeters (y-axls). (Take peak height
measurements with symmetrical peaks; In
all other cases, calculate peak areas.) From
this curve, or equation, determine the slope,
and calculate Its reciprocal to denote as the
calibration factor, S. If any point deviates
from the line by more than 7 percent of the
concentration at that point, remake and re-
analyze that standard. This deviation can be
determined by multiplying S times the peak
height response for each standard. The re-
sultant concentrations must not differ by
more than 7 percent from each known
standard mass (I.e.. 25. 50. 100, ISO, and 250
MB)-
Section No. 3.14.10
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
5.3 Conductivity Detector. Calibrate ac
cording to manufacturer's specifications
prior to Initial use.
5.4 Barometer. Calibrate against a mer-
cury barometer.
5.5 Temperature Gauge. Calibrate dial
thermometers against mercury-in-glass
thermometers.
5.6 Vacuum Gauge. Calibrate mechanical
gauges, if used, against a mercury manome-
ter such as that specified in Section 2.1.6 of
Method 7.
5.7 Analytical Balance. Calibrate against
standard weights.
6. Calculation*.
Carry out the calculations, retaining at
least one extra decimal figure beyond that
of the acquired data. Round off figures
after final calculations.
6.1 Sample Volume. Calculate the sample
volume V« (in ml) on a dry basis, corrected
to standard conditions, using Equation 7-2
of Method 7.
6.2 Sample Concentration of NO, as NO,.
Calculate the sample concentration C (in
mg/dscm) as follows:
o
HSP X 10«
. 7A-1
Where:
H "Sample peak height, mm
S = Calibration factor, ^.g/rnm
F -Dilution factor (required only If sample
dilution was needed to reduce the con-
centration into the range of calibration)
10* - 1:10 dilution times conversion factor
of
O
mg
10'ml
If desired, the concentration of NOi may
be calculated as ppm NOt at standard condi-
tions as follows:
ppm NOi - 0.5228 C Eq. 7A-2
Where:
0.5228 - ml/mg NO,.
O
-------
Section No. 3.14.10
Date July 1, 1986
Page 3
7. Biblioyravtiy.
1. Mulik, J. D. and E. SawicW. Ion Chro-
matographic Analysis of Environmental Pol-
lutants. Ann Arbor. Ann Arbor Science Pub-
lishers. Inc. Vol. 2. 1979.
2. SawicW. E.. J. D. Mulik. and E. Wittgen-
stein. Ion Chromatographic Analysis of En-
vironmental Pollutants. Ann Arbor. Ann
Arbor Science Publishers. Inc. Vol. 1.1978.
3. Sterner, D. D. Separation of Chloride
and Bromide from Complex Matrices Prior
to Ion Chromatographic Determination. An-
alytical Chemistry 52(12:1874-1877). Octo-
ber 1980.
4. Small, H.. T. S. Stevens, and W. C.
Batunan. Novel Ion Exchange Chromatogra-
phic Method Using Conductimetric Deter-
mination. Analytical Chemistry. 47(11:1801).
1975.
5. Yu. BUng K. and Peter R. Westlin. Eval-
uation of Reference Method 7 Flask Reac-
tion Time. Source Evaluation Society News-
letter. 4(4). November 1979.10 p.
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.14.11
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
11.0 REFERENCES
1.
10,
11.
12.
13,
Federal Register, Volume 48, No. 237, December 8, 1983.
Method 7A - Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions From
Stationary Sources.
Small, H. T., S. Stevens, and W. C. Bauman. rNovel Ion
Exchange Chrbmatographic Method Using Conductimetric
Determination. Analytical Chemistry, 47(11):801, 1975.
Johnson, E. L. and R. Stevenson. Basic Liquid
Chromatography. Varian Associates, Inc., 1978.
Yost, R. W., L. S. Ettre, and R. D. Conlon, Practical
Liquid Chromatography, An Introduction. Perkin-Elmer,
1980.
Smith, F. C.,
Chromatography.
1983.
Jr., and R. C. Chang. The Practice of Ion
John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York,
Stevens, T. S. and M. A. Langhorst. Agglomerated Pellicular
Anion-Exchange Columns for Ion Chromatography. Analytical
Chemistry, 54 (6):950, 1982.
Stevens, T. S., G. L. Jewett, and R. A. Bredeweg. Packed
hollow fiber suppressors for ion Chromatography.
Analytical Chemistry, 54 (7):1206, 1982.
Mulik, J. D., and E. Sawicki. Ion Chromatography.
Environmental Science and Technology, 13 (7):804, 1979.
Stevens, T. S., J. C. Davis, and H. Small. Hollow Fiber Ion
Exchange Suppressor for Ion Chromatography. Analytical
Chemistry, 53 (9):1488, 1981.
Stevens, T. S. Packed fibers and new columns speed,
simplify ion Chromatography. Industrial Research and
Development, September 1983.
Gjerde, D. T., J. S. Fritz, and-G.- Schmuckler. Anion
Chromatography with Low-Conductivity Eluents. Journal of
Chromatography, 186 (509), 1979.
Jupille, T., D. Burge, and D. Togami. Ion Chromatography
uses only one column to get all the ions. Research and
Development 26 (3):135, 1984.
Jenke, D. Anion Peak Migration Ion Chromatography.
Analytical Chemistry, 53 (9):1535, 1981.
-------
Section No. 3.14.11
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
14. Skoog, D. A., and D. W. West. Fundamentals of Analytical
Chemistry, Second Edition. Holt, Rinehart and Winston,
Inc., New York, 1969.
15. Yu, King D. and Peter R. Westlin. Evaluation of Reference
Method 7 Flask Reaction Time. Source Evaluation Society
Newsletter, 4(4), November 1979. 10 p. (Sees. Ill, 114,
and 301(a) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U. S. C.
7411, 7414, and 7601(a))).
16. Steinsberger, S. C. (Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.).
Unpublished results of NO sample stability study. June
1987. x
17. Siemer, D. D. Separation of Chloride and Bromide from
Complex Matrices Prior to Ion Chromatographic Determina-
tion. Analytical Chemistry. 52 (12):1874-1877, October
1980.
18. Eubanks, D. R., and J. R. Stillian.. Care of Ion
Chromatography Columns. Liquid Chromatography. 2 (2):74,
1984.
19. Hamil, Henry F. et. al. The Collaborative Study of
Methods 5, 6, and 7 in Fossil Fuel Fired Steam Generator
Final Report, EPA-650/4-74-013, May 1974.
20. Hamil, H. F., and R. E. Thomas. Collaborative Study of
Method for the Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions
from Stationary Sources (Nitric Acid Plants).
EPA-650/4074-028, May 1974.
21. Hamil, Henry F. Laboratory and Field Evaluations of EPA
Methods 2, 6, and 7. Final Report, EPA Contract No.
68-02-0626, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio,
Texas, October 1973.
o
O
-------
Section No. 3.14.12
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
12.0 DATA FORMS
Blank data forms are provided on the following pages for the
convenience of the Handbook user. Each blank form has the customary
descriptive title centered at the top of the page. However, the
section-page documentation in the top right-hand corner of each page
has been replaced with a number in the lower right-hand corner that
will enable the user to identify and refer to a similar filled-in
form in a text section. For example, Form M7A-1.2 indicates that the
form is Figure 1.2 in Section 3.14.1 of the Method 7A section.
Future revisions of these forms, if any, can be documented by 1.2A,
1.2B, etc. Eleven of the blank forms listed below are included in
this section. Four are in the Method Highlights subsection as shown
by the MH following the form number.
3.1 (MH)
3.2 (MH)
4.1A AND 4.IB
4.2A and 4.2B
4.3 (MH)
5.1 (MH)
5.4
6.1A and 6.IB
8.1
Title
Procurement Log
Analytical Balance Calibration Form
Analytical Data Form for Analysis of
Calibration Standards
Pretest Sampling Checks
Pretest Preparations
Nitrogen Oxide Field Data Form (English
and metric units)
NO Sample Recovery and Integrity Data
Form (English and metric units)
On-site Measurements
Posttest Operations
Analytical Data Form for Analysis of
Field Samples
Nitrogen Oxide Calculation Form (English and
metric units)
Method 7A Checklist to be Used by Auditors
-------
PROCUREMENT LOG
Item description
fity.
Purchase
order
number
Vendor
Date
Ord.
Rec.
Cost
Disposition
Comments
Quality Assurance Handbook M7A-1.2
o
o
o
-------
ANALYTICAL BALANCE CALIBRATION FORM
Balance name
Number
Classification of standard weights
Date
0.5000 g
1.0000 g
10.000 g
50.0000 g
i
100.0000 g
Analyst
Quality Assurance Handbook M7A-2.1
-------
ANALYTICAL DATA FORM FOR ANALYSIS OF CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Plant
Date
Location
Analyst
Was an integrator used?
yes
no
o
Was the intercept (I) used for calculations? yes no
Were all points within 7 percent of calculated value? yes
Sample
Identifier
Std 1
Std 2
Std 3
Std 4
Std 5
Sample
Mass
(VS NO,,)
25
50
100
150
250
Integrator Response
or Peak Height (mm)
H
1
2
3
Avg
Predicted
Sample Mass
(yg NO,)
no
Deviation
(%)
Predicted Sample Mass using Least Squares to Calculate Calibration Factor (S)
with Zero Intercept
s . SIHI •
-iZ*
S_ v
{
s =
i- S2H2 + S^H^ + S^ + S5H5
H2 + H2 + R2 + H2
X ) + ( )( ) * ( )(
>2 * < >2 * < >2 • i
yg N0_/mm
>2 . i )2
O
Predicted Sample Mass (yg N0_)
\ * /
V g NO- = H x S = (
d.
Equation 2-1
Predicted Sample Mass using Linear Regression to Calculate Calibration Factor
and Non-Zero Intercept (I)
y = mx + b; m =
(S)
m
m
y = H; and b = I (Intercept) =
Predicted Sample Mass (yg N0?)
yg N02 = S(H - I)
yg NO- at 25 yg standard = (
Equation 2-
Quality Assurance Handbook M7A-2.3
O
-------
Plant
Sample location
Operator
NITROGEN OXIDE FIELD DATA FORM (ENGLISH UNITS)
City
Date
Barometric pressure (P. )
in. Hg
Sample
number
Sample
point
location
Sample
time
24-hr
Probe
temperature ,
°F
Flask
and valve
number
Volume
of flask
and valve (Vp),
ml
Initial pressure
in. Hg
Leg R.±
Leg Bi
Pi3
Initial temperature
°F(ti)
°R(V±)b
bar
Ti
Quality Assurance Handbook M7A-4.1A
-------
Plant
Sample location
Operator
NITROGEN OXIDE FIELD DATA FORM (METRIC UNITS)
City
Date
Barometric pressure (P. )
Dar
mm Hg
Sample
number
Sample
point
location
Sample
time
24-hr
Probe
temperature,
°C
Flask
and valve
number
Volume
of flask
and valve (V_) ,
ml
«
Initial pressure
in. Hg
Leg AL
Leg B±
*ia
Initial temperature
°C(ti)
OKCS^)*
'< = p
bar
DT± = t± + 273°C.
o
o
Quality Assurance Handbook M7A-4.
o
-------
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY DATA FORM (ENGLISH UNITS)
Plant Date
Sample recovery personnel
Barometric pressure, (P, )
in. Hg
Person with direct responsibility for recovered samples
Sample
number
Final pressure,
in. Hg
Leg Af
Leg B£
V
Final temperature,
°F (tf)
°R (Tf)b
Sample
recovery
time,
24-h
Liquid
level
marked
Samples
stored
in locked
container
p =
-
-------
N0x SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY DATA FORM (METRIC UNITS)
Plant Date
Sample recovery personnel
Barometric pressure, (P, )
mm Hg
Person with direct responsibility for recovered samples
Sample
number
Final pressure,
mm Hg
Leg Af
Leg Bf
*fa
Final temperature,
°C (tf)
°K (Tf)b
Sample
recovery
time,
24-h
Liquid
level
marked
Samples
stored
in locked
container
- p
- p
bar
- (A,
Bf)
273°C.
Lab person with direct responsibility for recovered samples
Date recovered samples received Analyst
All samples identifiable?
Remarks
All liquids at marked level?
Signature of lab sample trustee
o
o
Quality Assurance Handbook M7A-4.2B
o
-------
ANALYTICAL DATA FORM.FOR ANALYSIS OF FIELD SAMPLES
Date samples received
Plant
Date samples analyzed
Run number(s)
Location
Calibration factor (S)
Reagent blank values:
1st,
Analyst
Intercept (I), if applicable
2nd, Avg
1
1
1
Field
Sample
Number
Analysis
Number
Instrument
Response
(mm)
Mean
Instrument
Response
(mm)
Deviation
(yg N02)
Mean
Instrument
Response
Blank
Corrected
(H)
i
Dilution
Factor
(F)
Mass of
Field
Sample
(ve N02)
Deviation of two samples, (%) = 100 x
Mass of field sample
without intercept
(Vg N0) --
Mass of field sample
with intercept
= 100
(must be less than
= S (H - I) F
Quality Assurance Handbook M7A-5.4
-------
NITROGEN OXIDE CALCULATION FORM (ENGLISH UNITS)
Sample Volume
V, = ml, P, = . in. Hg, T,. = °R
i —~ ^ — — £__—_- — £ __ — —
P± = . in. Hg, T± = °R
O
V =17.64 (V, - 25) /If _ li 1 = ml
SC I I „, rp ____
lf i
Equation 6-1
Sample Concentration
(No Intercept Used)
H = . mm, S = vg/mm,
F = _, V = ml
Equation 6-2
C = 6.243 x 10"8 HSF x 10 = . x 10~5 Ibs N00/dscf
V
sc
O
(With Intercept Used)
H = . mm, I = . mm, S = vg/mm,
F " ' vsc " ml
Equation 6-3
C = 6.243 x 10"8 (""DSP x 10 = ^ x 1Q-5 lbs N0 /dscf
Vsc -- --
Sample Concentration in ppm
, Equation 6-4
ppm N00 = 8.375 x 10 C = ppm NO0
^ — — — — £
Quality Assurance Handbook M7A-6.1A
O
-------
NITROGEN OXIDE CALCULATION FORM (METRIC UNITS)
Sample Volume • -; ••'•"
Vf = ml, Pf = . _ mm Hg, Tf = . _ °K
P. = .mm Hg, T. = . °K
4. —~ ~— —~ """ Jl *"~ ~~ ~- —
Equation 6-1
> /!«_i
IT T
\T£ Ti
Vsc = °-3858 (Vf - 25) |^f _ li.) = . ml
Sample Concentration
(No Intercept Used)
H = _ _. _ _ mm, S = _ _ _ _ yg/mm
F = , Vsc = ml
Equation 6-2
C = HSFVX 10 = _. x 103 mg N02/dscm
sc
(With Intercept Used)
H = . mm, I = . mm, S = yg/mm,
F = , V ml
— — — sc — — — —
(H-I)SF x 104 . _ x 1Q3 mg N0 /dscm
Vsc ~
Equation 6-3
Sample Concentration in ppm
Equation 6-4
ppm NO2 = 0.5228 C = _ ppm NO2
Quality Assurance Handbook M7A-6.1B
- / ?•>'
-------
METHOD 7A CHECKLIST TO BE USED BY AUDITORS
o
Yes
No
Comment
Presampling preparation
1. Plant operation parameters variation
2. Calibration of the flask and valve volume three
determinations
3. Absorbing reagent preparation
On-site measurements
4. Leak testing of sampling train
5. Preparation and introduction of absorbing solution
into sampling flask
Postsampling :
(Analysis and Calculation)
6. Control sample analysis
7. Sample aliquotting techniques
8. Ion chromatographic technique
a. Preparation of standard nitrate samples
(pipetting)
b. Calibration factor (+_ 7 percent for all
standards)
c. Duplicate sample values within 5 percent
of their mean
d. Adequate peak separation
O
9. Audit results
10%)
a. Use of computer program
b. Independent check of calculations
Comments
Quality Assurance Handbook M7A-8
•o
-------
Section No. 3.15
Date April 16, 1986
Page 1
Section 3.15
METHOD 7D - DETERMINATION OF NITROGEN OXIDE
EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
(Alkaline-Permanganate - Ion Chromatographic Method)
OUTLINE
Number of
Section Documentation pages
SUMMARY ~< 3^15 3
METHOD HIGHLIGHTS 3.15 8
METHOD DESCRIPTION
1. PROCUREMENT OF APPARATUS
AND SUPPLIES 3.15.1 18
2. CALIBRATION OF APPARATUS 3.15.2 21
3. PRESAMPLING OPERATIONS 3.15.3 6
4. ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS 3.15.4 10
5. POSTSAMPLING OPERATIONS' 3.15.5 13
6. CALCULATIONS 3.15.6 5
7. MAINTENANCE 3.15.7 .3
8. AUDITING PROCEDURES 3.15.8 6
9. RECOMMENDED STANDARDS FOR
ESTABLISHING TRACEABILITY 3.15.9 1
10. REFERENCE METHODS 3.15.10 9
11. REFERENCES 3.15.11 2
12. DATA FORMS 3.15.12 13
-------
Section No. 3.15
Date April 16, 1986
Page 2
SUMMARY
For EPA Method 7D , an integrated, metered sample is ex-
tracted via a heated probe postioned at a point within the duct
or stack. The sample is passed through a series of 3 restricted
orifice impingers each containing an absorbing solution of sodium
hydroxide (NaOH) and potassium permanganate (KMnO.). The absor-
bing solution reacts with nitrogen oxides in_the effluent gas to
form nitrate ion, N03~, and nitrite ion, NO2~. Nitrogen oxides
(NO ) are the sum of nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO,,)
whi^h are usually 19 to 1 by weight in the emission stream. Tfie
collected sample is allowed to sit for 36 hours prior to analysis
in order for the N02~ to react completely to NO3~. Ion
chromatography is then used to quantify the NO3~ which is
functionally related to the NO concentration of tne effluent
sample.
The absorbing solution also reacts with carbon dioxide, C02,
in the effluent sample. Therefore, EPA Method 3 determinations
of C02 must be conducted with Method 7D in order to correct the
Method 7D volumetric data for the volume of C02 absorbed.
Ammonia, NHo/ interferes with Method 7D by causing NO
results to be biased high. Method 7D results can be corrected
for the bias using data from concurrent determinations of
[]
V __ /
Collection of the NO is presumed to involve oxidation -
reduction reactions in which the NO is oxidized sequentially to
N00 and then to NO,,". The half reactions for the formation of
J
Mn04~ + 2H20
3e
3NO + 60H~ = 3N02~ + 3H20
and the overall reaction is:
3NO + MnO ~ + 20H~ = 3NO
4 2
+ 40H
+ 3e~
MnO0 + H0O
22
The half reactions for the formation of N03~ are:
3N02~ + 6OH~ = 3N03" + 3H20 + 6e~
2MnO
4H2O
6e" = 2Mn0
f Jt * ^**4^*^/ • W v3
-------
Section No. 3.15
Date April 16, 1986
Page 3
NO + MnO4~ » N03~ + Mn02 Reaction S-7
The rate of the reaction of NO to N02~ is controlled by the
solubility of NO. It takes approximately 36 hours for the
reaction of N02~ to N03~ to reach completion; the factors
controlling this reaction are unknown.
Absorption of N02 is also presumed to involve an oxida-
tion-reduction reaction. In contrast to NO, N02 is rather
reactive; thus, it is reasonable to show N02 reacting directly to
N03~. The half reactions are:
3N02 + 6OH~ = 3NO3" + 3H20 + 3e~ Reaction S-8
MnO4 + 2H2° + 3e = Mn°2 + 4OH Reaction S-9
and the overall reaction is:
3NO2 + MnO4~ + 2OH~ = 3N03~ + Mn02 + H2O Reaction S-10
The_ absorption of CO2 involves the simple acid-base reaction
with OH~ to form bicarbonate ion, HCO3~:
CO2 + OH~ = HCO3" Reaction S-ll
In the strongly basic absorbing solution, the bicarbonate ion
reacts further to carbonate ion, CO3~:
HC03~ + OH~ = H20 + C03= Reaction S-12
Method 7D is applicable to the measurement of NO emitted
from sources in the following categories:
(a) fossil-fuel-fired steam generators subject to 40 CFR
Part 60, Subpart D;
(b) electric utility steam generating units subject -to 40 CFR
Part 60, Subpart Da; and
>
(c) nitric acid plants subject to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart G.
It may be used as an alternative to Method 7 [as defined in
40 CFR Part 6O.8(b)] to determine compliance if the stack concen-
tration is within tHe analytical range. The lower limit of de-
tectability (with NO defined as NOO is approximately 13 mg N02/
m (7 ppm N02) when sampling is conducted at a flow rate of 500
cc/min for 1 hour. The method's upper analytical limit has not
been established; however, results of field evaluations have
shown that NO can be collected quantitatively at concentrations
of 1,782 mg N62/m (932 ppm N02) when sampling is conducted at a
flow rate of 500 cc/min for 1 nour.
-------
Section No. 3.15
Date A
Page 4
Date April 16, 1986 S~"\
The method description which follows is based on the method
that was promulgated on September 27, 1984.
Section 3.15.10 contains a copy of Method 7D, and blank data
forms are provided in Section 3.15.12 for the convenience of the
Handbook user.
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.15
Date April 16, 1986
Page 5
METHOD HIGHLIGHTS
Section 3.15 contains the required procedure for sampling and
analyzing emissions of nitrogen oxides from stationary sources
using Method 7D. For the method, an integrated sample is taken
from a point in the duct or stack using a heated probe
constructed of boirosilicate glass, stainless steel, or Teflon?
The effluent sample stream is passed through a series of three
restricted orifice impingers, each containing 200 ml of a 4.0%
(w/w) KMn04 and 2.0% (w/w) NaOH solution, termed "alkaline
permanganate solution." The alkaline permanganate solution
quantitatively removes NO , C02, and SQ2 from the effluent sample
stream and converts these to ions: N02 and NO3~, CO3 , and S0.~,
respectively. Sampling is conducted at a measured flow rate
between 400 and 500 cc/min for 60 minutes. The measured flow
rate is on a moisture- and C02-free basis, and consequently, when
the method is applied to effluents from combustion processes, the
measured flow rate will be less than the sampling flow rate. In
addition, sampling for C02 must be conducted using Method 3 in
conjunction with Method 7D in order to correct the volumetric
data for the volume of CO~ absorbed.
After acquisition, the sample is allowed to sit for a minimum
of 36 hours to ensure that the NO^"" has been quantitatively
reacted to N03~. Sample preparation entails destruction of the
excess permanganate and filtration of the solid, manganese
reaction product, manganese dioxide (MnO2). NO as N03~ is
quantified using ion chromatography (1C).
Ion chromatography is a relatively recent analytical develop-
ment. The reader is referred to the literature for detailed
descriptions of the subject. ~ Small, et al., developed the
technique using the principles of ion exchange chromatography and
conductimetric detection. Previous attempts to use this type of
detection were unsuccessful because of the presence of the
background electrolyte used for elution of the ionic species.
Small, et al., used a novel combination of resins to separate the
ions of interest and neutralize the eluent from the background.
The aqueous sample is introduced into a fixed-volume sample
loop by using a plastic syringe. Once injected, the sample is
carried through a separation column at different rates according
to their relative affinities for the resin material and are
therefore separated into discrete bands. The separated ions are
then passed through a post-separation suppressor device which
converts the eluent ions into a less conducting weak acid while
converting the analyte ions into a highly conducting form. This
permits the use of a conductivity cell as a very sensitive
detector of all ionic species.
12
Gjerde, et al^., described a modified ion chromatographic
method that eliminates the need for a suppressor device. Anions
.-n
-------
o
Section No. 3.15
Date April 16, 1986
Page 6
are separated on a column containing an anion-exchange resin with
a low exchange capacity. Because of the low capacity, a very
dilute solution of an aromatic organic acid salt may be used as
the eluent. The conductance of the eluent is sufficiently low
that no suppression is needed.
For Method 7D, either suppressed or non-suppressed 1C may be
used. The basic ion chromatograph will have the following
components:
(a) sample injection device,
(b) anion separation column,
(c) anion suppressor column, either packed bed or fiber type
(not required for non-suppressed 1C),
(d) conductivity detector, and
(e) recorder.
The critical aspects of the method are (a) the neasurement of —,
the gaseous sample volume, and (b) the preparation of the f ]
calibration standards for the ion chromatograph. Analysts are \ /
advised to observe specified procedures carefully at these points
of the method. Analysts performing the method should be well
trained in the use of the ion chromatograph.
Collaborative testing has been performed for Method 7D and
the results exhibit accuracy and precision similar to that of
Method 7.
The approporiate blank data forms at the end of this section
may be removed from the Handbook and used in the pretest, on-
site, and in posttest operations. • Each form has a subtitle to
assist the user in finding a similar filled-in fom in "the method
description. On the blank and filled-in forms, the items/ paran-
eters that can cause the most significant errors are designated
with an asterisk.
1. Procurement of Apparatus and Supplies
Section 3.15.1 (Procurement of Apparatus and Supplies) gives
specifications, criteria, and design features for the required
equipment and materials. The sampling apparatus of Method 7D has
design features similar to those of Method 6. Section 3.15.1 can
be used as a guide for procurement and initial checks of
equipment and supplies. The activity matrix (Table 1.1) at the
end of the section is a summary of the details given in the test
and can be used as a quick reference.
2. Pretest Preparations
Section3.15.2(Calibration of Apparatus) describes the
O
-------
Section No. 3.15
Date April 16, 1986
Page 7
required calibration procedures and considerations for the Method
7D sampling equipment (essentially the same as Method 6) and for
the ion chromatograph (the same as for Method 7A). Required
accuracies for each component are also included. A pretest
checklist (Figure 2.5, Section 3.15.2) or a similar form should
be used to summarize the calibration and other pertinent pretest
data. The calibration section may be removed along with the
corresponding sections from the other methods and made into a
separate quality assurance reference manual for use by personnel
involved in calibration activities.
Section 3.15.3 (Presampling Operations) provides the tester
with a guide for equipment and supplies preparation for the field
test. With the exception of the preparation of certain reagents,
these are the same as for Method 6 and Method 3. A pretest
preparation form (Figure 3.1, Section 3.15.3) can be used as an
equipment checkout and packing list. The method of packing and
the use of the described packing containers should help protect
the equipment, but neither is required by Method 7D.
Activity matrices for the calibration of equipment and the
presampling operations (Tables 2.1 and 3.1) summarize the activ-
ities.
3. On-Site Measurements
Section 3.15.4 (On-Site Measurements) contains step-by-step
procedures for sample collection and for sample recovery. Sample
collection is similar to Method 6, with the exception that the
alkaline permanganate solution is placed in restriced orifice
impingers and the C02 content of the stack gas must be determined
to correct the sample volume for the C02 removed by the sampling
train. The on-site measurement checklist (Figure 4.4, Section
3.15.4) provides the tester with a quick method of checking the
on-site requirements. Table 4.1 provides an activity matrix for
all on-site activities.
4. Posttest Operations
Section3.15.5("Post sampling Operations) gives the posttest
equipment procedures and a step-by-step analytical procedure for
determination of NO , expressed as N02- The posttest operations
form (Figure 5.4, Section 3.15.5) provides some key parameters to
be checked by the tester and laboratory personnel. The
step-by-step analytical procedure description can be removed and
made into a separate quality assurance analytical reference
manual for the laboratory personnel. Analysis of a control
sample is required prior to the analysis of the field samples.
This analysis of independently prepared, known standards will
provide the laboratory with quality control checks on the
accuracy and precision of the analytical techniques. Strict
adherence to the Method 7D analytical procedures must be
observed.
-------
Section No. 3.15
Date April 16, 1.-.
Page 8 (j
Section 3.15.6 (Calculations) provides the tester with the
required equations, nomenclature, and significant digits. It is
suggested that a calculator be used, if available, to reduce the
chances of calculation error.
Section 3.15.7 (Maintenance) provides the tester with a guide
for a maintenance program. This program is not required, but
should reduce equipment malfunctions. Activity matrices (Tables
5.1, 6.1, and 7.1) summarize all postsampling, calculation, and
maintenance activities.
5. Auditing Procedure
Section 3.15.8 (Auditing Procedures) provides a description
of necessary activities for conducting performance and system
audits. The performance audit of the analytical phase can be
conducted using audit samples supplied by the Quality Assurance
Division, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency. The data processing procedures
and a checklist for a systems audit are also included in this
section. Table 8.1 is an activity matrix for conducting the
audits.
Section 3.15.9 (Recommended Standards for Establishing
Traceability) provides the primary standard to which the analysis x—v
data should be traceable. The primary standard is sodium nitrate ( j
(NaNOg). V_y
6. References
Section 3.15.10 contains the promulgated Method 7D; Section
3.15.11 contains the references cited throughout the text; and
Section 3.15.12 contains copies of data forms recommended for
Method 7D.
o
-------
Section No. 3.15
Date April 16, 1986
Page 9
Date
Meter box number
PRETEST SAMPLING CHECKS
(Method 7D, Figure 2.5)
Calibrated by
Dry Gas Meter*
Pretest calibration factor (Y) =
average factor for each calibration run)
(within 2% of
Rotameter
Pretest calibration factor (Y ) or setting
(between 400 and 500 cc/minr.
Dry Gas Meter Thermometer
Was a pretest temperature correction made?
res
no
If yes, temperature correction
(within 3°C (5.4°F) of
• ^_^_ • f^Jf* / ^ f\ rt^^T1^ \ — -f?
reference values for calibration and within 6 C (10.8 F) of
reference values for calibration check).
Barometer
Was the pretest field barometer reading correct? yes no
(within 2.5 mm (0.1 in.) Hg of mercury-in-glass barometer).
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
-------
Section No. 3.15
Date April 16, 1986
Page 10
o
PRETEST PREPARATIONS
(Method 7D, Figure 3.1)
Apparatus check
Probe
Type liner
Glass
Stainless
steel
Other
Heated properly*
Leak checked
Filter
Glass wool
Other
Glassware
Restricted
orifice
impinger
Size
Type
Meter System
Leak-free pumps*
Rate meter*
Dry gas meter*
CO., Measurement
Orgat
Fyrite
Reagents
Water
Alkaline per-
manganate*
Silica gel
Other
Barometer
Drying tube
Acceptable
Yes
No
Quantity
required
Ready
Yes
No
Loaded
and packed
Yes
No
O
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
o
(n
-------
Section No. 3.15
Date April 16, 1986
Page 11
ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
(Method 7D, Figure 4.4)
Sampling
Impinger contents properly selected , measured, and placed in
impingers?*
Impinger Contents/Parameters*
1st: 200 ml of KMn04/NaOH
2nd: 200 ml of KMn04/NaOH
3rd: 200 ml of KMn04/NaOH
Drying tube: 6-16 mesh indicating type silica gel
Probe heat at proper level?*
Crushed ice around impingers?
Pretest leak check at 250 mm (10 in.) Hg?
Leakage rate?
Check of rotameter setting?
Probe placed at proper sampling point?
Flow rate constant at approximately 450 cc/min?*
CO2 concentration measured?*
Posttest leak check at 250 mm (10 in.) Hg?*
Leakage rate?*
Sample Recovery
Contents of impingers placed in polyethylene bottles?
Fluid level marked?*
Sample containers sealed and identified?*
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
-------
Section No. 3.15
Date April 16, 1986
Page 12
o
POSTTEST OPERATIONS
(Method 7D, Figure 5.4)
Reagents
Potassium nitrate dried at 105 to 110°C for a minimum of 2 hours
before use?
Stock standard '
-------
Section No. 3.15.1
Date April 16, 1986
Page 1
1.0 PROCUREMENT OF APPARATUS AND SUPPLIES
The procurement of appropriate apparatus and supplies enables
quality results to be obtained from Method 7D. This section
provides the user with information which complements the two
sections of Method 7D, entitled "Apparatus" and "Reagents." The
information is offered in the form of guidance and includes the
following:
o Procedures for use in checking whether apparatus conforms
with the requirements of the Method 7D and corrective
actions for when it does not (Table 1.1 at the end of this
section summarizes these procedures and also contains
recommended corrective actions).
o Background information which can explain why specific ap-
paratus and reagents are required, and therefore, what
limits may exist for alternatives or deviations.
o Practical information pertinent to the selection and use
of apparatus and reagents.
o Safety considerations.
Persons responsible for the initial procurement of apparatus
and supplies may find a procurement log helpful in ensuring that
all the necessary items are acquired and are in good working
order. A procurement log can be used to record the descriptive
title of the equipment, the quantity, an identification number
(if appropriate), and the results of acceptance checks. An
example procurement log is shown by Figure 1.1, a blank copy of
this form is contained in Section 3.15.12 for the Handbook user.
Calibration data obtained during acceptance checks also should be
recorded in a calibration log book; see Section 2.0.
1.1 Sampling Apparatus
Figure 1.2 shows the sampling train for Method 7D. It should
be noted that this sampling train is very similar to that used
for Method 6. Several of the components and their use' are
identical, including:
o Needle Valve
o Drying Tube
o Vacuum Pump
o Parts of the Metering System
This subsection addresses the specifications needed for procure-
ment purposes for all components of the sampling train and
associated apparatus.
1.1.1 Sampling Probe - Method 7D specifies that sampling
-------
Item description
Qty
Purchase
order
number
Vendor
Date
Ord.
Rec.
Cost
Disposition
Comments
(/)
77A/5I
AAC,
//&/&*
/f
U,
Figure 1.1. Example of a procurement log.
tJ o w
CD pj CO
IQ ft O
(D 0) rt
Z
O
M en
vo •
O3 I-1
O
O
O
-------
Section No. 3.15.1
Date April 16, 1986
Page 3
PROBE END PACKED.X
WITH GLASS WOOI*/*
,STACK WALL
RESTRICED ORIFICE IMPINGERS
SILICA GEL
DRYING TUBE
Figure 1.2. Method 7D sampling train.
-------
TM
Section No. 3.15.1
Date April 16, 1986
Page 4
probes are to be constructed of borosilicate glass. The method
also states that probes made of either stainless steel or Teflon
are acceptable. Quartz probes (for example Vycorw) may be used
for sampling when effluent temperatures exceed 480 (900 F).
The function of the probe is rather simple: to transport a
representative effluent sample, cleaned of particulate matter, to
the impinger train. To perform this function, the probe should:
(a) hold a filter to remove particulate matter, including
sulfuric acid mist;
(b) be constructed of a material that is unreactive toward
N0x;
(c) be free from leaks;
(d) be sufficiently long to enable samples to be acquired
from the specified points(s) within the stack or duct;
(e) have provisions for being heated in order to prevent
condensation of water vapor in the effluent sample; and
(f) be designed to connect to the inlet of the impinger
train.
The three materials identified above are unreactive toward NO .
The appropriate length for the probe is determined primarily By
its intended application which will depend upon regulatory
requirements and the dimensions of the stack or duct where the
measurements are to be made.
Sampling probes are generally provided with electrical heating
systems consisting of a nichrome wire which is wrapped around the
probe. The probe and heating system are, for protection, placed
within a tightly fitting tube, referred to as a sheath. The
heating system should be capable of preventing condensation of
water vapor in the effluent sample stream during sampling.
Condensation is not desired, because water absorbs N02 and lowers
NO results. Additionally, if a stainless steel probe is used,
condensation will promote corrosion which shortens probe lifetime
and makes cleaning difficult.
It is recommended that probes be performance checked before
initial use in the field to ensure that condensation can be pre-
vented. The probe should first be visually checked for cracks or
breaks and then checked for leaks according to the procedure
described in Section 3.15.3 of this Handbook. Then the probe
heating system should be checked as follows:
1. Connect the probe (without filter) to the inlet of the pump.
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.15.1
Date April 16, 1986
Page 5
2. Electrically connect and turn on the probe heater for 2 or
3 minutes. If functioning properly, it will become warm to the
touch.
3. Start the pump, and adjust the needle valve until a flow
rate of between 400 and 500 cc/min is achieved.
4. Check the probe. It should remain warm to the touch. The
heater must be capable of maintaining the exit air temperature at
a minimum of 100 C (212 F) under these conditions. If it cannot,
the probe should be rejected. Any probe not satisfying the
acceptance check should be repaired, if possible, or returned to
the supplier.
The connection between the probe's outlet and the impinger
train may be a simple fitting or an additional length of tubing.
Any connection should be leak-free. In addition, the connection
should be constructed of borosilicate glass, stainless steel, or
Teflon™, and therefore, like the probe be unreactive toward NO .
Lastly, if tubing is used, provisions should exist to prevent
condensation of water vapor upstream of the impinger train during
sampling. A heating system for the connection is not required if
the probe's heating system can supply enough heat to the effluent
sample.
1.1.2 Restricted Orifice Impingers - The sampling train requires
the use of three restricted orifice impingers connected in
series. Figure 1.3 shows one of these irapingers, which are
commercially available.
13
Impinger design is important to obtain quality results.
The restricted orifice impinger is specifically designed to
promote the complete collection of NO, which is relatively
unreactive. Two design features are important: (a) the length of
the liquid column, and (b) the size of the impinger's stem tip.
The impingers used for Method 7D are narrower than Greenburg-
Smith impingers in order to provide a greater depth of absorbing
reagent and, hence, to increase the reaction time of the sample
gas in the absorbing reagent. Because of the narrow openin.g of
the stem tip, the effluent sample is introduced into the
absorbing reagent as smaller bubbles. Smaller bubbles promote
the reaction of NO because of their greater surface-to-volurae
ratio and thus, greater exposure to the absorbing reagent.
Impingers with stem tips restricted to less than 1.5 mm
internal diameter are easily plugged by reaction products. The
problem typically affects only the first impinger of the sampling
train because: (a) most of the NO and CO2, and (b) all the
sulfur dioxide, if present, are reacted rhere. The plugging
problem can be minimized by making the length of the capillary
tubing as short as practical. Plugging also can be minimized by
keeping stem tips clean. Reaction products in the stem tips can
-------
DIMENSIONS: mm
35
CAPILLARY
TUBING:
1.5 I.D.
Section No. 3.15.1
,-Date April 16, 1986
Page 6
28/12
o
o
Figure 1.3. Restricted orifice irapinger.
O
-------
Section No. 3.15.1
Date April 16, 1986
Page 7
be removed by immersion in either 3 percent by volume hydrogen
peroxide solution [3% (v/v) H^O.., (aq)] or 3M hydrochloric acid
solution [HC1 (aq)]. CAUTION! Chlorine (C12) gas is evolved
during the use of the HC1; therefore, cleaning operations should
be conducted in a fume hood. The H^O^ solution is identical to
the absorbing solution used for Method 6.
It is recommended that each impinger upon receipt be checked
visually for damage, such as breaks or cracks, and for manufac-
turing flaws, such as poorly shaped connections.
Other nonspecified collection absorbers and sampling flow
rates may be used, subject to the approval to the Administrator,
but collection efficiency must be shown to be at least 99% for
each of three test runs and must be documented in the emission
test report. For efficiency testing, an extra absorber must be
added and analyzed separately and must not contain more than 1%
of the total NO . Three Greenburg-Smith design impingers may be
sufficient to provide adequate collection efficiency.
1.1.3 Vacuum Pump - The vacuum pump should'be capable of main-
taining a flow rate of approximately 400 to 500 cc/min for pump
inlet vacuums up to 250 mm (10 in.) Hg with the pump outlet near
standard pressure, [i.e., 760 mm (29;92 in.) Hg]. The pump must
be leak free when running and pulling a vacuum (inlet plugged) of
250 mm (10 in.) Hg. Two types of vacuum pumps are commonly used:
either a modified sliding fiber vane pump'or a diaphragm pump.
For safety reasons, the pump should be equipped with a three-wire
electrical cord.
To check the pump for leaks, install a vacuum gauge in the
pump inlet line. Plug the inlet line, and run the pump until the
vacuum gauge reads 250 mm (10 in.) Hg of vacuum. Clamp the pump
outlet line, and turn off the pump; the vacuum reading should
remain stable for 30 seconds.
1.1.4 Volume Meter - The dry gas meter must be capable of
measuring total volume with an accuracy to within 2%, calibrated
at the selected flow rate (between 400 and 50O cc/min), and must-
be equipped with a temperature gauge (dial thermometer, or
equivalent) capable of measuring the gas temperature to within 3
C (5.4°F).
A new dry gas meter may be checked for damage visually and by;
performing a calibration according to Section 3.5.2 of this
Handbook. Any dry gas meter that is damaged, behaves errati-
cally, or does not give readings within +2% of the selected flow
rate for each calibration run is unsatisfactory. Also upon
receipt, the meter should be calibrated over a varying flow range
to see whether there is any effect on the calibration.
Dry gas meters that are equipped with temperature compensa-
-------
Section No. 3.15.1
Date April 16, 1986
Page 8
o
tion must be calibrated over the entire range of temperatures
that the meter encounters under actual field conditions. The
calibration must contain at least one data point at each 10°?
interval. All temperatures that are to be used in the field must
be within 2% of the calibrated value.
The wet test meter used to check the dry gas meter should be
calibrated using the primary displacement technique explained in
Section 3.5.2 of this Handbook. The wetgtest meter must have a
capacity of at least 0.0003 m /min (0.1 ft /min) with an accuracy
of +2%; otherwise at the higher flow rates, the water will not be
level and this possibly will result in an incorrect reading.
1.1.5 Rotameter - A rotameter, or its equivalent, with a range
of 0 to 1 L/min is used to monitor the sampling flow rate. The
rotameter is checked against the calibrated dry gas meter with
which it is to be used or against a wet test meter. The rota-
meter flow setting of about 450 cc/min should be determined.
Changes in pressure, density, and viscosity of the sample gas
will affect the calibrated sample rate. However, since sampling
is performed at a constant rate, which need not be isokinetic,
these changes do not affect the sample volume measured by the dry X~N
gas meter. ^ f J
1.1.6 Needle Valve - A metering valve with conveniently sized
fittings is required in the sampling train to adjust and control
the sample flow rate. It is recommended that the needle valve be
placed on the vacuum side of the pump.
1.1.7 Drying Tube - The drying tube should be packed wi-th 6- to
16-mesh indicating-type silica gel, or equivalent, to dry the
sample gas and to protect the pump and the meter. A drying tube
can be made by filling a 10-mm polyethylene tube with silica gel
and packing glass wool in each end to hold the silicia gel and
protect the sampling system. Plastic tubing can be utilized in
any connections downstream of the impinger train without
affecting the sampling results. The drying tube should have a
minimum capacity of 30 to 50 g of silica gel and should be
visually checked before use for proper size and for damage.
If the silica gel has been used previously, it must be dried
at 175 C (350 F) for 2 hours. New silica gel may be used as
received. Other types of desiccants may be used subject to
approval of the Administrator.
1.1.8 Metering System - For ease of use, the metering system—
which contains the dry gas meter, thermometer(s), vacuum pump,
needle valve, and rotameter—can be assembled into one unit
(meter box). After a meter box has been either constructed or
purchased, then positive and negative pressure leak checks should
be performed.
O
-------
Section No. 3.15.1
Date April 16, 1986
Page 9
The positive pressure leak check, similar to the procedure
described in Method 5 (Section 3.4) of this Handbook, is per-
formed as follows:
1. Attach rubber tubing and inclined manometer, as shown in
Figure 1.3 of Section 3.4.1.
2. Shut off the needle valve, and apply positive pressure to
the system by blowing into the rubber tubing until the inclined
manometer or magnehelic gauge reads from 12.5 to 17.5 cm (5 to
7 in.) H20.
3. Pinch off the tube, and observe the manometer for 1
minute. A loss of pressure indicates a leak of the apparatus in
the meter box.
After the meter box apparatus has passed the positive leak
check, then the negative leak check should be performed as
follows:
1. Attach the vacuum gauge at the inlet to the drying tube,
and pull a 250 mm (10 in.) Hg vacuum.
2. PincbNor^clamp the outlet of the flow meter. This can be
accomplished by closing the optional shutoff valve if employed.
3. Turn off the pump. Any deflection noted in the vacuun
reading within 30 seconds indicates a leak.
4. Carefully release the vacuum gauge before releasing the
flow meter end.
If either of these checks detects a leak that cannot be cor-
rected, the meter box must be rejected and/or returned to the
manufacturer.
The dry gas meter must be equipped with a temperature gauge
(dial thermometer or equivalent). It is recommended that upon
receipt this be checked visually for damage, such as dents or a
bent stem. The thermometer should read within 3 C (5.4°F) of the
true value when checked at two different ambient temperatures
against a mercury-in-glass thermometer that conforms to ASTM E-l
No. 63C or 63F. The two ambient temperatures used to calibrate
the thermometer must differ by a minimum of 1O C (18 F). Damaged
thermometers that cannot be calibrated are to be rejected.
1.1.9 Barometer - A mercury, aneroid, or other barometer
capable of measuring atmospheric pressure to within 2.5 na
(0.1 in.) Hg may be used. However, in many cases, the barometric
pressure can be obtained from a nearby National Weather Service
Station, in which case the station value (which is the absolute
-------
Section No. 3.15.1
Date April 16, 1986 —.
Page 10 f ^
barometric pressure) should be requested. The tester should be
aware that the pressure is normally corrected to sea level by the
weather station; the uncorrected readings should be obtained. An
adjustment for differences in elevation of the weather station
and the sampling location is applied at a rate of -2.5 mm Hg/30 m
(-0.1 in. Hg/100 ft) of elevation increase, or vice versa for
elevation decrease.
Accuracy can be ensured by checking the field barometer
against a mercury-in-glass barometer or its equivalent. If the
field barometer cannot be adjusted to agree with the mercury-
in-glass barometer, it is not acceptable.
1.1.10 Vacuum Gauge - At least one 760-mm (29.92-in.) Hg gauge
is necessary to leak check the sampling train. An acceptable
vacuum gauge, when checked in a parallel leakless system with a
mercury U-tube manometer at 250-mm (10-in.) Hg vacuum, will agree
within 25 mm (1.0 in.) Hg.
1.2 Sample Recovery Apparatus
1.2.1 Wash Bottles - Two 500-ml polyethylene or glass wash
bottles are needed for quantitative recovery of collected
samples. x/"""
o
1.2.2 Storage Bottles - One 1-L polyethylene bottle is required ^+-~s
to store each collected sample. An additional polyethylene
bottle is necessary to retain a blank for each absorbing solution
used in testing. Wash and storage bottles should be visually
checked for damage. CAUTION: Each storage bottle seal should be
checked prior to use to ensure that leakage will not occur.
1.2.3 Funnel and Stirring Rods - The analyst may find a glass
funnel and glass stirring rods are helpful in transferring the
absorbing reagent to and from the restricted orifice impingers.
The flow of absorbing reagent can be controlled by pouring along
the glass stirring rod.
1.3 Apparatus for Sample Preparation and Analysis
1.3.1 Magnetic Stirrer with Magnetic Stirring Bars - The
magnetic stirrer and stirring bars are used for the removal of
excess permanganate ion. The stirring bars should be Teflon1"-
coated owing to the corrosiveness of the alkaline-permanganate
solution. Stirring bars having dimensions 25 mm by 10 mm are
recommended. Smaller stirring bars can be expected to be less
efficient because of the resistance offered by the absorbing
reagent, which is relatively viscous.
Manual stirring is acceptable; however, being tedious and
laborious, it is not recommended.
O
-------
Section No. 3.15.1
Date April 16, 1986
Page 11
1.3.2 Filtering Flask - One filtering flask having a 500-ml
capacity is needed to filter the liquid sample after the excess
permanganate ion has been removed.
1.3.3 Buchner Funnel - The Buchner funnel is used with the
filtering flask for the filtering operations. A convenient size
funnel is one with a 75-mm internal diameter. The analyst may
wish to attach a section of Teflon™ tubing to the funnel's spout
in order to
-------
o
Section No. 3.15.1
Date April 16, 1986
Page 12
1.3.9 Erlenmeyer Flasks - Erlenmeyer flasks having a 250-ml
capacity are used for operations involving the removal of excess
permanganate ion in the samples.
1.3.10 Ion Chromatograph - An ion chromatograph (1C) is used for
analyzing the samples. The instrument should, at a minimum, have
the components described below.
Columns —The 1C should be equipped with an ion separator
column capable of resolving nitrate ion (N03~) from sulfate ion
(SO."), which may be found in samples acquired at
fossil-fuel-fired steam generators. In addition, it should be
capable of detecting and resolving nitrite ion (N02~). Either
suppressed or nonsuppressed IC's may be used provided that
performance meets the above criteria. Suppressed IC's should be
equipped with an acid (H ) suppressor column in addition to the
anion separator column. Suppressor columns (fiber preferred over
packed bed) are generally produced as proprietory items; however,
an acceptable column can be made using the resin available from
BioRad Company, 32nd and Griffin Streets, Richmond, California.
Pump - The pump must be capable of maintaining a steady
eluent flow as required by the system.
Flow Gauges - These must be capable of measuring the
specified eluent flow rate. It is recommended that the gauge be
calibrated upon receipt.
Conductivity Detector - It is recommended that the detector
be calibrated according to manufacturer's procedures prior to
initial use.
Recorder - It should be compatible with the output voltage of
the detector.
1.3.11 Analytical Balance - One analytical balance that weighs
to 0.1 mg and a set of Class-S calibration weights to check the
accuracy of the balance (+0.3 mg) upon receipt are needed. The
balance should be serviced or returned to the manufacturer if
agreement cannot be met.
1.4 Reagents - Unless otherwise indicated, it is intended that
all reagents conform to the specifications established by the
Committee on Analytical Reagents of the American Chemical Society
(ACS), where such specifications are available; otherwise, use
the best grade available.
1.4.1 Sampling - For sampling, the following are needed. -~
Absorbing solution - The absorbing solution is prepared by V_x
dissolving40.0g potassium permanganate (KMnO.) and 20.0 g
o
-------
Section No. 3.15.1
Date April 16, 1986
Page 13
sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in 940 ml of water. The solution's
concentration is 4.0 percent (w/w) KMnO., 2.0 percent (w/w)
NaOH. CAUTION: Extreme care should be taken in handling the
KMnO. reagent and the absorbing solution. KMnO, is a strong
oxidant and is incompatible with substances containing carbon
such as paper, fabric, and human tissue. It is recommended that
eye protection be worn when handling the absorbing solution.
Skin exposed to the absorbing solution should be washed- with
plenty of water and until the exposed area no longer exhibits a
soapy feeling.
Water - Water should be used which conforms with ASTM
specification D1193-82, Type III. Type III water is prepared by
distillation, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, or a combination
thereof, followed by polishing with a 0.45 ym membrane filter.
The specifications for Type III water are shown below.
Specifications for ASTM D1193 - 82, Type III Water
Total matter, max., (mg/L) 1.0
Electrical conductivity, max., 1.0
(umho/cm) at 25 C
Electrical resistivity, min., 1.0
(ymho/cm) at 25 C
pH at 25°C 6.2 to 7.5
Minimum color retention time 10 '
of KMnO4, (min)
Maximum soluble silica, (vg/L) 10
Note: Mention of "water" anywhere in this Section (3.15) refers
to ASTM D1193-82, Type III Water as described above. By using
water from the same source for making reagents, calibration
standards, and eluents for the ion chromatograph, the presence of
trace quantities of nitrate in the water will be negated.
Therefore, a water blank correction is not necessary in the
development of the calibration curve.
1.4.2 Analysis - For analysis, the following reagents are
required.
••• y'
Water - See Subsection 1.4.1 above. *
Hydrogen Peroxide - Five (5) percent (v/v) hydrogen peroxide
(H?O2) is used which is prepared by mixing 1 part 30% (v/v) H^O,
with 5 parts water.
-------
Section No. 3.15.1 S~\
Date April 16, 1986 ( )
Page 14 v—/
Reagent Blank - The reagent- blank may be prepared by dissol-
ving 2.4 g KMnO4 and 1.2 g NaOH in 96 ml water. Alternatively,
the blank may be prepared by diluting 60 ml of the absorbing
reagent to 100 ml using water.
Potassium Nitrate (KNO-) Standard Solution - The following
procedure is observed to prepare the KN03 standard solution.
1. Dry an-adequate amount of KNO« at 110°C for about 2 hours;
then transfer to a desiccator, and allow to cool to laboratory
temperature.
2. Using an analytical balance, accurately weigh 9 to 10 g of
the dried KN03 to the nearest 0.1 mg.
3. Transfer the KN03 to a suitable container, such as a bea-
ker, dissolve the KN03 in water, and transfer all of the KNOo
solution to a 1-L volumetric flask.
4. Dilute the KN03 solution to the 1-L mark with water.
The N03~ concentration_of the standard solution is calculated
from the mass of KN03 using the following relationship:
N03~ Mass of KNO /"'>3
Concentration = (g)
'q/10 yg . L \/ 62.01 g/mol NO "\
yg . ml /yiOl.10 g/mol KN03/
Method 7D states that the KN03 standard solution is stable for 2
months without preservative at laboratory conditions. Novice
analysts should note that certain microbes feed on N03~" solutions
with the consequence for Method 7D being that NO results will be
biased high. For this reason, standard solutions should be
disposed of after 2 months.
Eluent Solution - For IC's involving the suppressed
technique.,, an eluent solution being 3 x 10~ M NaHCO3 and
2.4 x 10 M Na2C03 has proved adequate for Method 7D
applications. This eluent is prepared by taking 1.008 g NaHCO-
and 1.018 g Na2C03 and dissolving them in 4 L water.
Other eluents may be used provided that they are capable of
resolving N03~ from SO.~ and other ions which may be present in
samples.
Quality Assurance Audit Samples - Quality Assurance Audit
Samples are required to be analyzed in conjunction with field
samples. The audit samples for Method 7D are essentially the
same as those described in Method 7, Section 3.3.9. Because the
analytical range for Method 7D differs from that for Method 7,
analysts requesting audit samples should specify that samples be
applicable to Method 7D. . • ,
-------
Section No. 3.15-1
Date April 16, 1986
Page 15
Table 1.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR PROCUREMENT OF APPARATUS AND SUPPLIES
Apparatus and
supplies
Sampling probe
with heating
system
Restricted
orifice
impingers
Vacuum pump
Acceptance limits
Capable of maintaining
100°C (212°F) exit
air at flow rate of
500 cc/min
Standard stock glass;
ensure that dimensions
conform with specifi-
cations
Capable of maintaining
flow rate of AOO to
500 cc/min; leak free
at 250 mm (10 in.) Hg
Dry gas meter
Wet test meter
Rotameter
Drying tube
Capable of measuring
total volume within
2% at a flow rate of
500 cc/min
Capable of measuring
total volume within
2% at a flow rate of
500 cc/min
Within 5% of manufac-
turer's calibration
curve (recommended)
Minimum capacity of
30 to 50 g of silica
gel
Frequency and method
of measurement
Visually check and
run heating system
checkout
Visually check upon
receipt for breaks
or leaks
Check upon receipt
'for leaks^ and^capacity
Check for damage upon
receipt, and calibrate
(Sec. 3.15.2) against
wet test meter
Upon assembly, leak
check all connections,
and check calibration
by liquid displacement
Check upon receipt for
damage, and calibrate
(Sec. 3.15.2) against
wet test meter
Visually check upon
receipt for damage and
proper size
Action if
requirements
are not met
Repair, or
return to
supplier
Return to nanu-
facturer
As above
Reject if dam-
aged, behaves
erratically, or
cannot be
properly adjusted
As above
Recalibrate, and
construct a new
calibration curve
Return to supplier
(continued)
-------
Section No. 3.15.1
Date April 16, 1986
Page 16
Table 1.1 (continued)
o
Apparatus and
supplies
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Thermometers
Within 1°C (2°F)
true value in the range
of 0 C to 25°C
(32° to 77°F)
for impinger and within
3°C (5.4°F) for
dry gas meter thermom-
eter
Check upon receipt for
damage (i.e., dents and
bent stem), and
calibrate (Sec. 3.15.2)
against mercury-in-
glass thermometer
Return to
supplier if unable
to calibrate
Barometer
Capable of measuring
atmospheric pressure
to within 2.5 mm
(0.1 in.) Hg calibrate
Check against mercury-
in-glass barometer or
equivalent (Sec. 3-5-2)
Determine cor-
rection factor,
or reject if
difference is
more than 2.5 m
o
Vacuum gauge
0 to 760 mm (0 to
29.92 in.) Hg range,
^25 mm (1.0 in.) Hg
accuracy at 250 mm
(10 in.) Hg
Check against U-tube
mercury nanometer
upon receipt
Adjust, or re-
turn to supplie
Wash bottles
Polyethylene or glass,
500-ml
Visually check for
damage upon receipt
Replace, or re-
turn to supplier
Storage
bottles
Polyethylene, 1-L
Visually check for dam-
age upon receipt, and
be sure that caps seal
properly
As above
Pipettes and
volumetric
flasks
Glass, Class-A
Upon receipt, check for
stock number, cracks,
breaks, and manufac-
turer flaws
As above
Water
(continued)
Must conform to ASTM-
Dl193-82, Type III
Check each lot or spec-
ify type when ordering
As above
O
}
I
-------
Section No. 3.15.1
Date April 16, 1986
Page 17
Table 1.1 (continued)
Apparatus and
supplies
Stopcock
grease
Analytical
balance
Ion Chroma-
tograph
1. Columns
2. Pump
3. Flow
gauges
(continued)
Acceptance limits
High vacuum, high temp-
erature chlorofluoro-
carbon grease
Capable of measuring
to +0.1 mg
1. Capable of giving
nitrate ion peaks with
baseline separation
2. Capable of deliv-
ering eluent at con-
stant and repeatable
flow rate
3. Capable of giving
repeatable indications
of eluent flow rate
Frequency and method
of measurement
Visually check upon
receipt
Check with standard
weights upon receipt
and before each use
1. Check during
analyses
2. Check during
analyses by monitor-
ing flow rate
3. Check calibration
and repeatability
upon receipt
Action if
requirements
are not net
Return to
supplier, and
note in procure-
ment log
Replace, or
return to manu-
facturer
i
1. Consult opera-
tor's manual; re-
generate sup-
pressor column;
clean separator
column; check
performance of
components below;
replace column(s)
if above actions
are unsuccessful
2. Consult opera-
tor's manual;
oil, clean, re-
repair, replace,
or return to man-
ufacturer; check
tubing of ion
chromatograph for
leaks or ob-
structions;
check flow neter
performance
3. Consult oper-
ator's manual;
adjust, repair,
replace, or return
to manufacturer
-------
Table 1.1 (continued)
Section No. 3.15
Date April 16, 1986
Page 18
986Q
Apparatus and
supplies
4 . Conduc-
tivity
detector
5 . Recorder
Hydrogen per-
oxide
Potassium
nitrate
Sodium carbonate
Sodium bicarbon-
ate
Sodium hydroxide
Potassium
permanganate
Acceptance limits
4. Capable of giving
responses which can be
manually or electron-
ically integrated
within a precision of
5 percent
5- As above, if used
record responses for
manual integration
30# aqueous solution,
ACS reagent grade
ACS reagent grade
ACS reagent grade
ACS reagent grade
ACS reagent grade
ACS reagent grade
Frequency and method
of measurement
4. Calibrate accord-
ing to manufacturer's
instructions prior to
use
5- Check during
analyses
Check each lot, or
specify type when
ordering
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
Action if
requirements
are not net
4. Consult opera-
tor's manual;
Repair, replace.
or return to
manufacturer
5- Consult opera-
tor's nanual;
adjust speed
Replace or return
to manufacturer
As above
As above
As above
As above
o
-------
Section No. 3.15.2
Date April 16, 1986
Page 1
2.0 CALIBRATION OF APPARATUS
Calibration of the apparatus is one of the most important
functions in maintaining data quality. The detailed calibration
procedures included in this section were designed for the
equipment specified in Method 7D and described in the previous
section. Table 2.1 at the end of this section summarizes the
quality assurance functions for calibration. All calibrations
should be recorded on standardized forms and retained in a
calibration log book.
The calibration procedures and considerations addressed in
this section are those which are unique to Method 7D. The
sampling phase of Method 7D involves the use of equipment that is
essentially the same as that used for Method 6. The analysis
phase of Method 7D entails the use of an ion chromatograph, an
instrument that also is used for Method 7A. The Handbook user
should note that: (a) the standard used for Method 7A is sodium
nitrate (NaNO,-, while for Method 7D the standard used is
potassium nitrate (KNO^); and (b) sulfate ion (SO4~) peaks in ion
chromatograms for Method 7D will have a lesser tendancy to
overlap and_ therefore to interfere with nitrate (NO3~) peaks
because SO." will exist at a lower concentration because it
originates only from sulfur oxides in the effluent.
2.1 Metering System
2.1.1. Wet Test Meter - The wet test meter must be calibrated
and have the proper capacity. For Method 7D, the wet test meter
should have a capacity of at least 1 L/min. No upper limit is
placed on the capacity; however, the wet test meter dial should
make at least one complete revolution at the specified flow rate
for each of the three independent calibrations.
Wet test meters are calibrated by the manufacturer to an
accuracy of +2%. Calibration of the wet test meter must be
checked initially upon receipt and yearly thereafter.
The following liquid positive displacement technique can be
used to verify and adjust, if necessary, the accuracy of the wet
test meter to +2%:
1. Level the wet test meter by adjusting the legs until the
bubble on the level located on the top of the meter is centered.
2. Adjust the water volume in the meter so that the pointer
in the water level gauge just touches the meniscus.
3. Adjust the water manometer to zero by moving the scale or
by adding water to the manometer.
4. Set up the apparatus and calibration system as shown in
Figure 2.1.
/ -V- 3
-------
Section NoJr3;15.2
Date April 16, 1986
Page 2
o
MANOMETER
THERMOMETER
AIR INLET
WATER
LEVEL
GAUGE
OUT
VALVE
200O-ml LINE
TYPE-A
VOLUMETRIC
FLASK
O
Figure 2.1. Calibration check apparatus for wet test meter.'
O
-------
Section No. 3.15.2
Date April 16, 1986
Page 3
a. Fill the rigid-wall 5-gal jug with water to below
the air inlet tube. Put water in the impinger or
saturator, and allow both to equilibrate to room
temperature (about 24 hours) before use.
b. Start water siphoning through the system, and
collect the water in a 1-gal container, located in
place of the volumetric flask.
5. Check -operation of the meter as follows:
a. If the manometer is reading <10 mm (0.4 In.) H2O,
the meter is in proper working condition. Continue
to step 6.
b. If the manometer reading is >10 mm (0.4 in. ) H20,
the wet test meter is defective. If the wet test
meter is defective, and if the defects(s) (e.g., bad
connections or joints) cannot be found and
corrected, return it to the manufacturer for repair.
6. Continue the operation until the 1-gal container is al-
most full. Plug the inlet to the saturator. If no leak exists,
the flow of liquid to the gallon container should stop. If the
flow continues, correct for leaks. Turn the siphon system off by
closing the valve, and unplug the inlet to the wet test meter.
7. Read the initial volume (V.*) from the v;et test meter
dial, and record on the wet test meter calibration log. Figure
2.2.
8. Place a clean, dry volumetric flask (Class-A) under the
siphon tube, open the pinch clamp, and fill the volumetric flask
to the mark. The volumetric flask must be large enough to allow
at least one complete revolution of the wet test meter with not
more than two fillings of the volumetric flask.
9. Start the flow of water, and record the maximum wet test
meter manometer reading during the test after a constant flow of
liquid is obtained.
10. Carefully fill the volumetric flask, and shut off the
liquid flow at the 2-L mark. Record the final volume shown on
the wet test meter.
11. Steps 7 through 10 must be performed three times.
Since the water temperature in the wet test meter and
reservoir has been equilibrated to the ambient temperature and
the pressure in the wet test meter will equilibrate with the
water reservoir after the water flow is shut off, the air volume
can be compared directly with the liquid displacement volume.
-------
Wet test meter serial number 45"
Date
Range of wet test meter flow rate 0~~12-0 I—I#ilt\
Volume of test flask VQ = J2..00L-
3 •••^•a- I ••••••••! II •
Satisfactory leak check?
Ambient temperature of equilibrate liquid in wet test meter and reservoir 7*f- /"*
Test
number
1
2
3
Manometer
reading, a
mm t^O
r
5"
f
Final
volume (Vj ) ,
L
/.??
2.00
Z.OD
Initial
volume (V.),
L
0
0
0
•total
volume, (V )
L
/??
2.00
z.oo
Flask
volume (V ) ,
L
2.. 00
Z.6to
Z..CA
Percent
error, c
%
•o.r
d
0
aMust be lesa than 10 mm (0.4 in.) H20.
Calculations:
Vc - V,.
.
m
c% error = 100 (V_ - Va)/Vn =»
. d S o
fi.f
(+1%).
Signature of calibration person
Figure 2.2. Wat toot motor calibration log.
O
O
*a a en
W 0) (D
IQ-ft O
a> ro rt
H-
iN > O
t) P
h
H-2
H 0
O> CO
H1 O1
VO •
CO tO
01
O
-------
Section No. 3.15.2
Date April 16, 1986
Page 5
Any temperature or pressure difference would be less than
measurement error and would not affect the final calculations.
The error should not exceed +1%; if this error magnitude is
exceeded, check all connections within the test apparatus for
leaks, and gravimetrically check the volume of the standard
flask. Repeat the calibration procedure, and if the tolerance
level is not met, adjust the liquid level within the meter (see
the manufacturer's manual) until the specifications are met.
2.1.2 Sample Metering System - The sample metering system, con-
sisting of the drying tube, needle valve, pump, rotameter, and
dry gas meter, is initially calibrated by stringent laboratory
methods before it is used in the field. The calibration is then
rechecked after each field test series. This recheck requires
less effort than the initial calibration. When a recheck
indicates that the calibration factor has changed, the tester
must again perform the complete laboratory procedure to obtain
the new calibration factor. After the meter is recalibrated, the
metered sample volume is multiplied by the calibration factor
(initial or recalibrated) that yields the lower gas volume for
each test run.
Initial Calibration - The metering system should be calibra-
ted when first purchased and at any time the posttest check
yields a calibration factor that does not agree within 5% of the
pretest calibration factor. A calibrated wet test meter
(properly sized, with +1% accuracy) should be used to calibrate
the metering system.
The metering system should be calibrated in the following
manner before its initial use in the field.
1. Leak check the metering system (drying tube, needle
valve, pump, rotameter, and dry gas meter) as follows:
a. Temporarily attach a suitable rotameter (e.g., 0-40
cm /min) to the outlet of the dry gas meter, and
place a vacuum gauge at the inlet to the drying
tube.
b. Plug the drying tube inlet. Pull a vacuum of at
least 250 mm (10 in.) Hg.
c. Note the flow rate as indicated by the rotameter.
d. A leak of <0.02 L/min must be recorded or leaks must
be eliminated.
e. Carefully release the vacuum gauge before turning
off pump.
-------
Section No. 3.15.2
Date April 16, 1986
Page 6
i
2. Assemble the apparatus,' as shown in Figure 2.3, with the
wet test meter replacing the drying tube and impingers; that is,
connect the outlet of the wet test meter to the inlet side of the
needle valve and the inlet side of the wet test meter to a sat-
urator which is open to the atmosphere. Note; Do not use a
drying tube.
3. Run the pump for 15 minutes with the flow rate set at
450 cc/min to allow the pump to warm up and to permit the
interior surface of the wet test meter to become wet.
4. Collect the information required in the forms provided,
Figure 2.4A (English units) or 2.4B (metric units), using sample
volumes equivalent to at least five revolutions of the dry test
meter. Three independent runs must be made.
5. Calculate Y. for each of the three runs using Equation
2-1. Record the values in the form (Figure 2.4A or 2.4B).
460°F or 273°C) Equation 2-1
v,q p™ (t + 460°F or 273°C)
where: d m, w
o
/ Dm \
Vw Vpm + 13'6/ <*d +
><•»
O
Y. = ratio for each run of volumes measured by the wet
test meter and dry gas meter, dimensionless
calibration factor,
3 3
V = volume measured by wet test meter, m (ft ),
Vr
P = barometric pressure at the meters, mm (in.) Hg,
D <= pressure drop across 4:he wet test meter, mm (in.)
H20,
t, = average temperature of dry gas meter, °C (°F),
3 3 '
Vd = volume measured by the dry gas meter, m (ft ), and
t = temperature of wet test meter, C (°F).
W . . ,
6. Adjust and recalibrate or reject the dry gas meter if one
or more values of Y. fall outside the interval Y +0.02Y, where Y
is the average for triree runs. Otherwise, the Y (calibration
factor) is acceptable and is to be used for future checks and
subsequent test runs. The completed form should be forwarded to ^_^^
the supervisor for approval, and then filed in the calibration f)
log book. \*^/
-------
THERMOMETER
MANOMETER
AIR INLET
Figure 2.3. Sample metering system calibration setup.
V D W
0) 0) (0
IQ rt O
(D (P rt
H-
-J > O
T3 3
n
H- 21
H O
CO
M cn
vo •
oo to
cn
-------
Date
2/2-
Calibrated by
Meter box number ££~\ Wet test meter number /<3/-/4
Barometer pressure, P,
m
in. Hg Dry gas meter temperature correction factor
Wet test
meter
pressure
drop
.a
in. H20
o.tt
6.2.?
0.1$
Rota-
meter
setting
(R8>.
ft3/nin
0.0 Ik
0.011*
6. OH,
Wet test
meter gas
volume
72,
730.02!
733. /SB
Wet test
meter
gas temp
(tw>>
°F
72-
72-
72-
Inlet
gas
temp
'V*
op
80
82.
84
Dry test meter
Outlet
gas temp
(
ez-
Tirae
of run
(9),d
min
66
&
(,&
Average
ratio
(Yj),6
/•0/3
1,017-
l.oio
(Tri),f
0.16(*
O.WO
O.W4-
a Dn expressed as negative number.
Volume passing through meter. Dry gas volume is minimum for at least five revolutions of the meter.
c The average of t, and t. if using two thermometers; the actual reading if using one thermometer.
The time it takes to complete the calibration run.
e With Y defined as the average ratio of volumes for the wet test and the dry test meters, Y.
Y.+0.02 Y for
calibration and Y - Y +0.05 Y for the posttest checks; thus,
w (td + 460°P) pn + (
. 2)
With Y defined as the average ratio of volumetric measurement by wet tent meter to rotameter.
Tolerance Yr - 1 +0.05 for calibration and Y +0.1 for posttest checks.
, (td + 460°?) [Pn + (Dn/13.6)
9 (tw + 460°F) (Pm) (Ra)
"d d co
CD y o
to ft o
(D (D rt
(-••
00 > O
TJ 3
h
H- 2
H O
•
H
CT> CO
. -3)
and
O1
CD
Figure 2.4A. Dry gas meter calibration data form (English units).
O
O
O
-------
Date 2
Calibrated by
X>
»
Meter box number E:£~l Wet test meter number /Of "
Barometer pressure, Pm * 748
Dry gas meter temperature correction factor /v4 °C
Wet test
meter
pressure
drop
•
°C
2*-
Z8
2-f
Dry test meter
Outlet
gas temp
t>
66
b&
Average
ratio
(Y^,6
/.0&
/,v/6
l,oz
H tn
vo t
oo to
cn
Figure 2.4B. Dry gas meter calibration data form (metric units).
-------
o
Section No. 3.15.2
Date April 16, 1986
Page 10
Posttest Calibration Check - After each field test series,
conduct a calibration check as in Subsection 2.1.2 with the
following exceptions:
1. The leak check is not conducted because a leak may have
been corrected that was present during testing.
2. Three or more revolutions of the dry gas meter may be
used.
3. Only two independent runs need be made.
4. If a temperature-compensating dry gas meter was used, the
calibration temperature for the dry gas meter must be within 6°C
(10.8 F) of the average meter temperature observed during the
field test series.
When a lower meter calibration factor is obtained as a result
of an uncorrected leak, the tester should correct the leak and
then determine the calibration factor for the leakless system.
If the new calibration factor changes the compliance status of
the facility in comparison to the lower factor, either include
this information in the report or consult with the Administrator
for reporting procedures. If the calibration factor does not
deviate by >5% from the initial calibration factor Y (determined
in Subsection 2.1.2), then the dry gas meter volumes obtained
during the test series are acceptable. If the calibration factor
does deviate by >5%, recalibrate the metering system as in
Subsection 2.1.2; for the calculations, use the t:alibration
factor (initial or recalibration) that yields the lower gas
volume for each test run.
2.2 Thermometer
The thermometer(s) on the dry gas meter inlet used to measure
the metered sample gas temperature should be initially compared
with a mercury-in-glass thermometer that meets ASTM E-l No. 63C
or 63F specifications:
*
1. Place the dial type or an equivalent, thermometer- and the
mercury-in-glass thermometer in a hot water bath, 40 C to 50 C
(104 to 122 F). Compare the readings after the bath stabilizes.
2. Allow both thermometers to come to room tenperature.
Compare the readings after the thermometers stabilize.
3. The dial type or equivalent thermometer is acceptable if
(1) values agree within 3 C (5.4 F) at both points (steps I and 2
above) or (2) if the temperature differentials at both points are /~~\
within 3 C (5.4 F) and the temperature differential is taped to I J
the thermometer and recorded on the meter calibration form ^-^
(Figure 2.4A or 2.4B).
O
-------
Section No. 3.15.2
Date April 16, 1986
Page 11
4. Prior to each field trip, compare the temperature reading
of the mercury-in-glass thermometer at room temperature with that
of the thermometer that is part of the metering system. If the
values or the corrected values are not within 6 C (10.8°F) of
each other, replace or recalibrate the meter thermometer.
2.3 Rotameter
Method 7D recommends (optional) that the tester calibrate the
rotameter prior to each test. Before being sent to the field,
the rotameter should be cleaned and maintained according to the
manufacturer's instructions. For this reason, it is recommended
(optional) that the calibration curve and/or rotameter markings
be checked upon receipt and then routinely checked with the
posttest metering system check. The rotameter may be calibrated
as follows:
1. Ensure that the rotameter has been cleaned as specified
by the manufacturer and is not damaged.
2. Use the manufacturer's calibration curve and/or markings
on the rotameter for the initial calibration. Calibrate the
rotameter as described in the metering system calibration of
Subsection 2.1.2, and record the data on the calibration form
(Figure 2.4A or 2.4B).
3. Use the rotameter for testing if the pretest calculated
calibration is within 450 +25 cc/min. If, however, the calibra-
tion point is not within 5%~, determine a new flow rate setting,
and recalibrate the system until the proper setting is
determined.
4. Check the rotameter calibration with each posttest
metering system check. If the rotameter check is within 10% of
the 450 cc/min setting, the rotameter is acceptable. If,
however, the check is not within 10% of the flow setting,
disassemble and clean the rotameter, and perform a full
recalibration.
2.4 Barometer
The field barometer should be adjusted initially and before
each test series to agree within 2.5 nun (0.1 in.) Hg with a
mercury-in-glass barometer or with the pressure value reported
from a nearby National Weather Service Station and corrected for
elevation. The tester should be aware that the pressure readings
are normally corrected to sea level. The uncorrected readings
should be obtained. The correction for the elevation difference
between the weather station and the sampling point should be
applied at a rate of -2.5 mm Hg/30 m (-0.1 in. Hg/100 ft)
elevation increase, or vice versa for elevation decrease.
-------
Section No. 3.15.2
Date April 16, 1986
Page 12
The calibration checks should be recorded on the pretest
sampling form (Figure 2.5).
2.5 Analytical Balance
The analytical balance used to weigh the reagents for the
nitrate stock standard should be calibrated by the following
procedure:
1. Zero the balance.
2. Place a 5-g Class-S weight on the balance. Record the
balance reading for the 5-g weight.
3. Place a 10-g Class-S weight on the balance. Record the
balance reading for the 10-g weight.
4. The balance readings for the 5-g and 10-g weights must be
within 2 mg of the actual weights.
5. If the balance readings are greater than +2 mg either of
the actual weights, repair the balance or contact the balance
manufacturer.
2.6 Ion Chromatograph System
2.6.1 Performance Check of the Ion Chromatograph - Method 7D
states that the instrument_ used for analysis should provide
adequate resolution of N0~ and should be able to resolve and
detect nitrite ion (N02~). It is recommended that the instrument
be performance checkea prior to initial use to ensure that the
instrument can meet the above criteria. --,-..*
Method 7D does not quantify the criteria for acceptable
instrument performance. The numerical limits and procedures
given below are offered from a purely technical viewpoint. Their
observance should ensure that the instrument conforms with the
method, but should not be interpreted as a requirement. The
preliminary considerations follow. . ,
Conductivity Detector - Prior to its initial use, the con-
ductivity detector of the ion Chromatograph should be calibrated
by the method described in the operator's manual. After this
initial calibration, a quality control sample should be analyzed
to check the detector response. A quality control sample should
be analyzed immediately after the initial calibration curve for
each analytical run and the concentration compared to the values
obtained for the same QC sample in the past. If the control
limits are exceeded, the analysis must be stopped until the
problem is found.
Integrator - Many ion chromatographs are equipped with elec-
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.15.2
Date April 16, 1986
Page 13
Date z'Z-^ - Calibrated by
^ ,
Meter box number _£^—/
Dry Gas Meter*
Pretest calibration factor = /.O&O (within 2% of average factor
for each calibration run).
Rotameter
Pretest calibration factor (Y ) or setting = /'.00 (between
400 and 500 cc/min).
Dry Gas Meter Thermometer
Was a pretest temperature correction made? yes A no
If yes, temperature correction (within 3°C (5.4°F) of
reference values for calibration and within 6 C (10.8 F) of
reference values for calibration check).
Barometer
Was the pretest field barometer reading correct? X yes no
(within 2.5 mm (0.1 in.) Hg of mercury-in-glass barometer).
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
Figure 2.5. Pretest sampling checks.
-------
Section No. 3.15.2
Date April 16, 1986
Page 14
tronic integrators which, if properly used, give results of
greater accuracy and precision than manual techniques. (Manual
techniques include quantification based upon measuring: (a) peak
height, (b) peak area by triangulation, (c) peak area by multi-
plying peak height times the peak width at half-height, (d) peak
area by cutting out the peak and weighing it on a balance, and
(e) peak area by planimetry.) However, an electronic integrator
is a potential source of error if integration parameters are not
set up correctly. For example, when the Hewlett Packard 3390A
Recording Integrator is used in the peak area mode, the processes
of recognizing and integrating peaks in the data signal depend
upon the values chosen for PK WD and THRSH. If these two
parameters are mismatched to each other or to the data signal,
peaks will be missed by the integrator. The appropriate sections
of the operator's manual should be read carefully before
selecting and setting integrator parameters.
Electronic integrators, used in the peak height mode, have
been demonstrated to give equally good results as the peak area
mode, and therefore, many laboratories have chosen to use this
simpler method.
The performance of the integrator in either mode should be
checked using a quality control sample as described above. A
second check of the integrator's performance can be made by com-
paring its results to those obtained manually. If the integrator
is functioning properly, results should agree within 5 percent.
Sample Injection Device Contamination Check - The analyst is
encouraged to check the sample injection device for contamination
by injecting water before the calibration standards are
analyzed. Contaminants will appear as peaks on the chromato-
gram. Repeated injections of water should be used to remove
contaminants from the sample injection device. If certain peaks
remain after several injections, then the water may be con-
taminated and should be replaced.
Separation of Nitrate, NO,," - To ensure accurate results
from the ion chromatographic analysis, baseline separation of the
NOg peak from the other ion peaks should be achieved. A source
of SO." in a sample may be sulfur dioxide present in the effluent
stream sample. Figures 2.6a and 2.6b show two chromatograms, one
having overlapping N0« and S04~ peaks,_ and the other having
baseline separation or the N0o~ and SO4~ peaks.
The analyst is encouraged to check the performance of the ion
chromatograph system before analyzing samples in order to ensure
that baseline separation of N03~ is attainable.
o
o
The ion chromatograph can be performance checked using a /~*.
solution containing NOg~ and_SO4~ for compliance purposes or a ( ]
solution containing NO0 , NO0~, and S0.~ if the nitrate is to V—/
-------
Ssction No. 3.15.2
Date April 16, 1986
Page 15
Figure 2.6a. Example chromatogram having overlapping peaks.
Figure 2.6b. Example chromatogram showing baseline
separation of peaks.
"1
-------
Section No. 3.15.2
Date Ap
Page 16
Date April 16, 1986 {J
be quantified. A solution that' will provide rigorous conditions
involves the use of KN03 working standard solution (described io
Section 3.15.5, page 3) and N02 (if applicable) and SO.
solutions, the preparation of which are addressed below.
The SO," solution is prepared as follows: Weigh out 0.231 of
sodium sulfate (Na2SO.), and transfer it to a beaker. Dissolve
the Na2S04 in water, quantitatively transfer the solution to a
2 50-ml volumetric flask, and finally, dilute to the mark with
water.
The concentration of the solution is 625 yg S04~/ml. Sodium
sulfate (Na^SO.) is a component of the pusher solution in the
Orsat apparatus used for Method 3. It is not special and has
been chosen because of its probable availability. Other SO.
reagents can be used.
If the nitrite is to be quantified, then separation_of the
nitrate peak should also be checked. To prepare the N02~ stock
solution, first weigh out 52.5 mg sodium nitrite (NaNOO and
transfer it to a beaker. Dissolve the NaN02 in water,
quantitatively transfer it to a 250-ml volumetric flask, and
finally, dilute to the mark with water. To prepare the N02
working solution, pipet 10.0 ml of the stock solution into a
100-ml volumetric flask, and dilute to volume with water. The
concentration of the working solution is 14 y g NO«~/ml.
To prepare the performance check solution, pipet 1O ml of the
KNOg working standard solution, 8 ml of the SO." solution, and 1
ml of the N0~ working solution ( if applicable; into a 200-ml
volumetric flask, and dilute to the mark with water.
The concentration of N03~ in the performance check sample is
7.5 yg NO,, /ml, which corresponds to a NO level around the
emission standard for coal-fired boilers subject to 40 CFR Part
60, Subparts D or Da. This correspondence also is based on the
assumptions that sampling is conducted for one hour at 500 ml/min
and that the effluent sample is 12% (v/v) CO2.
The SQ4~ concentration of the performance check sample is
25 yg S04~/ml, which corresponds to an SO2 level of roughly 1000
ppm (for a one-hour sample acquired at 500 ml/min and containing
12% (v/v) c°2^* This concentration level should be more than
adequate for situations involving the application of Method 7D to
sources subject to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart_ D; thus, it is
recommended that analysts decrease the SO." concentration in
proportion to the S0? levels expected for the effluent. For
example, if the effluent concentration of SO,, were 500 ppm, 5 ml
(rather than 10 ml) of the S04 solution would be used in
o
-------
Section No. 3.15.2
Date April 16, 1986
Page 17
preparing the performance check sample. For applications
upstream of flue gas desulfurization systems at sources subject
to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Da, the opposite situation may exist,
and it is recommended that the concentration of SO." be increased
accordingly.
The NO?- concentration of the performance check solution is
0.07 yg NO2~/ml. This corresponds to 6 ppm NO2 for a one-hour
sample acquired at 500 ml/min and containg 12% fv/v) CO2«
The performance check solution should be analyzed with the
calibration standards during the initial check of the ion
chromatograph's calibrations. The same experimental conditions
should be observed for the solution and the standards. Figure
2.7_provides _an example chromatogram that shows where the N02~,
NO
and SO. can be expected to elute.
2.6.2 Preparation of Calibration Curve - Method 7D gives general
instructions for preparing the calibration curve for the ion
chromatograph. Accordingly, the method requires that:
(a) at least four calibration standards be prepared?
(b) the concentration range of the calibration standards
cover the concentration range of the samples being
analyzed;
(c) the calibration standards be prepared from the KN03
standard solution using pipettes having volumes 1.0 nl
or greater;
(d) the calibration standards be analyzed and the results be
interpreted in the same manner as for the samples being
analyzed;
(e) the results of the analyses of the calibration standards
(in units of either peak height or peak area) should be
plotted versus the standards' concentrations (in units
of vg N00 /ml);
o •
(f) the plotted points define a linear relation;
(g) the calibration equation be determined from the points
using linear regression; and
(h) the calibration standards be analyzed twice in order to
compensate for any drift in the response of the ion
chromatograph.
The method leaves to the analyst details including:
-------
Section No. 3.15.2
Date April 16, 1986
Page 18
o
SO. 5.5 minutes
NO, 3.7 minutes
1.4 minutes
O
Figure 2.7.
Chromatogram showing resolution of nitrite,
nitrate, and sulfate peaks.
o
I A'
-------
(a)
(b)
(c)
the concentration
standards;
Section No. 3.15.2
Date April 16, 1986
Page 19
values for the individual calibration
the degree of linearity of the calibration curve
will ensure quality results; and
that
the procedure to be used to compensate results
ion chromatograph's drift.
for the
Concentration values for calibration standards - The step-by
step-procedures for preparing the calibration standards and
preparing the calibration curve are given in Section 3.15.5.
-------
Section No. 3.15-2
Date April 16, 1<>S6
Page 20
o
Table 2.1. ACTIVITIY MATRIX FOR CALIBRATION OF EQUIPMENT
Apparatus
Acceptance Limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not net
Wet test meter
Capacity of at least 2
L/min and an accuracy
within 1.0#
Calibrate initially and
then yearly by liquid
displacement
Adjust until
speci fi cations
are met, or re-
turn to nanu-
facturer
Dry gas meter
Y. = Y+0.02Y at a
flow rate of about
450 cc/min
Calibrate vs. wet test
meter initially and
when the posttest check
is not within Y+0.05
Repair end then
recalibrate, or
replace
Dry gas meter
thermometer
Within 3C (5.
of true value
Calibrate each initially
as a separate component
against a mercury-in-
glass thermometer; after
train is assembled
before each field test,
compare with mercury-in-
glass thermometer
Adjust, deter- /~-^
nine a constant f ]
correction
or reject
Rotameter
Clean and maintain ac-
cording to manufactur-
er's instructions (re-
quired) ; calibrate to
+5X (recommended)
Initially and after each
field trip
Adjust and recal-
ibrate, or reject
Barometer
Within 2.5 mm
(0.1 in.) Hg of
mercury-in-glass bar-
ometer or of weather
station value
Calibrate initially
using a mercury-in-glass
barometer; check before
and after each field
test
Adjust to agree
with certified
barometer
Analytical
balance
Weight within 2 mg of
standard weights
(Class-S)
Use standard weight be-
fore preparation of
working solution
Repair or return.
to manufacturer
(continued)
O
-------
Section No. 3.15.2
Date April 16, 1986
Page 21
Table 2.1. (continued)
Apparatus
Acceptance Limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not cet
Ion chromato-
graph
Calibrate prior to each
set of sample analyses
With each set of field
samples; calibration
standards prepared from
potassium nitrate
Interpret data
using another
technique; e.g..
if using peak
height, change
to peak area;
analyze addition-
al calibration
standards; cali-
brate conductiv-
ity detector;
consult oper-
ator's nanual
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.15.3
Date April 16, 1986
Page 1
3.0 PRESAMPLING OPERATIONS
The quality assurance activities for presampling preparation
are summarized in Table 3.1 at the end of this section. See
Section 3.0 of this Handbook for details on preliminary site
visits.
3.1 Apparatus Check and Calibration
Figure 3.1 or a similar form is recommended to aid the tester
in preparing an equipment checklist, status report form, and
packing list.
3.1.1 Sampling Train - The schematic for the NO sampling train
is given in Figure 1.2. Commercial models ofxthis system are
available. Each individual or fabricated train must be in
compliance with the specifications in Method 7D, Section 3.15.10.
3.1.2 Probe - The probe should be cleaned internally by brushing
first with tap water, then with deionized distilled water, and
finally with acetone. Allow the probe to dry in the air. In
extreme cases, the glass or stainless steel liner can be cleaned
with stronger reagents; the objective is to leave the liner free
from contaminants. The probe's heating system should be checked
to see whether it is operating properly. The probe must be leak
free when sealed at the inlet or tip and checked for leaks at a
vacuum of 250 nun (10 in.) Hg with the meter box. Any leaks
should be corrected. The liner should be sealed inside the metal
sheath to prevent diluent air from entering the source since most
stacks are under negative pressure.
3.1.3 Restricted Orifice Impingers and Glass Connectors - All
glassware should 5i cleaned with detergent and tap water, and
then with reagent water. Any items that do not pass a visual
inspection for cracks or breakage must be repaired or discarded.
3.1.4 Drying Tubes - Drying tubes should be packed with 6- to
16-mesh silica gel and sealed at both ends.
3.1.5 Valve and Rotameter - Prior to each field trip or a^b any
sign of erratic behavior, the flow control valve and rotameter
should be cleaned according to the maintenance procedure recom-
mended by the manufacturer.
3.1.6 Pump- - The vacuum pump and oiler should be serviced as
recommended by the manufacturer, every 3 months, or every 10th
test (whichever comes first), or upon erratic behavior
(nonuniform or insufficient pumping action).
3.1.7 Dry Gas Meter - A dry gas meter calibration check should
be made in accordance with the procedure in Section 3.15.2. An
acceptable posttest check from the previous test is sufficient.
-------
Section No. 3.15.3
Date April 16, 1986
Page 2
o
Apparatus check
Probe
Type liner/
Glass X
Stainless
steel
Other
Heated properly*
Leak checked
Filter
Glass wool
Other
Glassware
Restriced
orifice
impinger
Size
Type
Meter System
Leak-free pumps*
Rate meter*
Dry gas meter*
CO2 Measurement
Orsat iS
Fyrite
Reagents
Water
Potassium
permanganate*
Silica gel
Other
Barometer
Drying tube
Acceptable
Yes
/
•"
,/"
tX
iX
iX
iX
tx
X"
iX
I/"
,/
/
iX
NO
Quantity
required
f
c5Al^// k>/
/f
Z
1
I
Z.
z ^/
z «*/
$-#
1
b
Ready
Yes
X
*x
iX
t/
iX
•X
^
^
ix-
*s
^
\^
No
Loaded
and packed
Yes
*x
^x
«x
^
l^
l^
i/
ix- .
(X
u^
NO
O
* Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
Figure 3.1. Pretest preparations.
O
-------
Sectibn No. 3.15.3
Date April 16, 1986
Page 3
3.1.8 Thermometers - The thermometers should be compared with
the mercury-in-glass thermometer at room temperature prior to
each field trip.
3.1.9 Barometer - The field barometer should be compared with
the mercury-in-glass barometer or with a National Weather Service
Station reading prior to each field trip.
3.1.10 COp Analysis - Method 3 sampling apparatus should be leak
checked, and the reagents should be checked to ensure freshness
(see Section 3.2 of this Handbook).
3.2 Reagents for Sampling
The following reagents are needed during the sampling phase
of Method 7D:
3.2.1 Water - Deionized distilled water should conform to ASTM
specification D1193-82, Type III (see Subsection 1.4.1 for
detailed specifications).
3.2.2 Potassium Permanganate/Sodium Hydroxide (KMnO./NaOH)
Solution - Dissolve 40.0 g of KMNO4 and 20.0 g of NaOH in 940 ml
of water.
3.3 Packaging Equipment for Shipment
Equipment should be packed in rigid containers to protect it
against rough handling during shipping and field operations.
3.3.1 Probe - The inlet and outlet of the probe must be sealed
and protected from breakage. A suggested container is a wooden
case lined with polyethylene foam or other suitable packing
material; the case should have separate compartments for indiv-
idual devices. The case should be equipped with handles or eye
hooks that can withstand hoisting, and should be rigid to prevent
bending or twisting during shipping and handling.
3.3.2 Impingers, Connectors, and Assorted Glassware - All ijnpin-
gers and glassware should be packed in a rigid container and
protected by polyethylene foam or other suitable packing mater-
ial. Individual compartments for glassware help to organize and
protect each item. The impinger train may be charged and
assembled in the laboratory if sampling is to be performed within
24 hours.
3.3.3 Drying Tubes and Volumetric Glassware - A rigid container
lined with polyethylene foam material protects drying tubes and
assorted volumetric glassware.
3.3.4 Meter Box - The meter box, which contains the valve,
rotameter, vacuum pump, dry gas meter, and thermometer(s), should
-------
be packed in
strong enough
pump oil should be
is advisable to
failure.
Section No. 3.15.3
Date April 16, 1986
Page 4
a rigid shipping container unless its housing is
to protect components during travel. Additional
packed if oil is required for operation. It
ship a spare meter box in case of equipment
o
3.3.5 Wash Bottles and Storage Containers - Storage containers
and miscellaneous glassware should be packed in a rigid
foam-lined container. Samples being transported in the
containers should be protected from extremely low ambient
temperatures (below freezing).
O
o
-------
Section No. 3-15.3
Date April 16. 1986
Page 5
Table 3.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR PRESAMPLING OPERATIONS
Operation
Probe
Acceptance limits
1. Probe liner free
of contaminants
2. Probe leak free at
250 mm (10 in.) Hg
3. No moisture conden-
sation
Frequency and method
of measurement
1. Clean probe inter-
nally by brushing with
tap water, then deion-
ized distilled water,
then acetone; allow to
dry in air before test
2. Visually check for
cracks before test
3. Check out heating
system initially and
when moisture appears
during testing
Action if
requirements
are not met
1. Retrace
cleaning pro-
cedure and
assembly
2. Replace
3. Repair
or replace
Restricted
orifice impin-
gers and glass
connectors
Clean and free of
breaks, cracks, etc.
Clean with detergent,
tap water, and then
with deionized dis-
tilled water
Repair or
discard
Flow control
valve and
rotameter
Clean and without sign
of erratic behavior
(ball not moving)
Clean prior to each
field trip or upon
erratic behavior
Repair or
return to
manufacturer
Vacuum pump
Maintain sampling rate
of 400 to 500 cc/min
at a vacuum up to
250 mm (10 in.) Hg
Service every 3 DO. or
upon erratic behavior;
check oiler jars every
10th test
As above
Dry gas meter
Clean and within 2%
of calibration factor
Calibrate according
to Section 3.15.2;
check for excess oil
if oiler is used
As above
CO- analyzer
Leak-free and fresh
reagents
Leak check, and check
reagents
As above
(continued)
-------
Section No. 3-15-3
Date April 16, 1986
Page 6
o
Table 3-1 (continued)
Operation
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Reagents
Sampling
Requires all ACS grade
reagents
Prepare and store in
sealed containers
Prepare new
reagent
Sample recovery
Requires water on
site
Quantity sufficient to re-
cover sample after testing
and clean impingers prior
to testing
Prepare new
reagent
Package Equip-
ment for Ship-
ment
Probe
Protect with poly-
ethylene foam
Prior to each shipment
Repack
O
Impingers,
connectors,
and assorted
glassware
Pack in rigid con-
tainers with poly-
ethylene foam
As above
As above
Drying tubes,
volumetric
glassware
Sturdy container
lined with foam
As above
As above
Meter box
Meter box case and/or
container to protect
components, pack spare
meter box and oil
As above
As above
Wash bottles
and storage
containers
Pack in rigid foam-
lined container
As above
As above
Samples
Protect from extreme
cold (below freezing)
As above
As above
O
-------
Section No. 3.15.4
Date April 16, 1986
Page 1
4.0 ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
On-site activities include transporting the equipment to the
test site, unpacking and assembling, sampling for nitrogen
oxides, and recording the data. The quality assurance activities
are summarized in Table 4.1 at the end of this section.
4.1 Transport of Equipment to the Sampling Site
The most efficient means of transporting the equipment from
ground level to the sampling site (often above ground level)
should be decided during the preliminary site visit or by prior
correspondence. Care should be taken to prevent damage to the
equipment or injury to test personnel during the moving. A
laboratory area should be designated for preparing the absorbing
reagents, charging the impingers, and sample recovery,
4.2 Preliminary Measurements and Setup
Method 7D outlines the procedure for determining the concen-
tration of nitrogen oxides in the gas stream. The accuracy of
the equipment that has been transported to the sampling site and
that may have been handled roughly can be determined by making a
one-point check of the rotameter reading against the dry gas
meter reading at the test site. Use Equation 3 in Figure 2.4A or
2.4B, and substitute dry gas meter readings in place of wet test
meter readings (i.e., V. = V ). Y . should bebetween 0.9 and
1.1; if not, the me"er box has lost its rate or volume
calibration. The tester can still use the meter box, but the
data should not be released for. decision making until a post-test
recalibration has been made. If the dry gas meter calibration
factor did change, the dry gas meter volumes may have to be
corrected. Record the test identification number on the sampling
data form, Figure 4.1.
4.3 Sampling
The on-site sampling includes the following steps:
1. Preparation and/or addition of the absorbing reagents to
the impingers.
2. Setup of the sampling train.
3. Connection to the electrical service.
4. Preparation of the probe (leak check of entire sampling
train and addition of particulate filter).
5. Check of rotameter setting.
6. Insertion of the probe into the stack.
-------
Plant name
Location
Operator
Actvd
Ab. 3
City
Date
Section No. 3-15-4
Date April 16, 1986
Page 2
M~T~
O
Sample no. AP — I
Probe length/material
Meter box no.
Probe setting
Meter factor (Y)
* f~~
Sampling point location(s)
Rotameter setting
Initial leak check?
0.004-
fa im>nj /i'J'A Bar press mm (in.) Hg
Rotameter check? 4-& cc-mf/i
C0_ concentration (1)
(2)
leak check? 0.OO&
(3) fa?-
avg
Sampling
time,
min
0
5~
/o
/S~
20
z£
50
35"
40
45"
5~0
5£T
60
Total
Clock
time
24 h
It '00
1(0$
II 10
II 75"
//20
//2£~
//30
y/3$~
II to
//45"
7/50
//sr
/200
Dry gas
meter
readings
L (ft3)
/40. Z-/S"
/42. 46. /
/44. 101
!4-(p. ^5"B
/ 4^.202-
/S7.4?f
/5"3.6?^
/5S". ^3
/5B.222
/60.480
/62.72^
764.^82
7(^7. 226
Total
27.0((
Sample flow
rate setting,
cc/min (ft^/min)
•4-52?
451?
452)
45"0
457)
4^0
4-£d
4^0
4£0
4-Sb
4-57)
4 SO
Sample volume
metered,_(V )
L (ft3) m
2.2-40
2.240
2. 2-5*7
2.244
2.262
2.245
Z.2S4
Z.Z6>^
2,256
2.248
2.25-4
2.244
Q •* ^ o ^^ • /
avg t-'t-^ I
Percent
deviation,3
*
-0,ZZ.
-0.4*7
+ 0,21
-0,31
+ 0.04
-0.21
J-0,15
t-0,80
f6,S/
-^)./3
+ OJ3
-0.31
Avg
dev ^«T^-
Dry gas
meter temp,
°C (°F)
72
74
7f /
75"" ^
76
76
76
7B
76
1^
76
7^?
*
Avg
76,4
Percent deviation = m ~ m avg x 100 (must be less than 10 percent).
V avg
Figure 4.1. Field sampling data form for NO .
X
O
-------
•••'•'• Section No. 3.15.4
Date April 16, 1986
Page 3
7. Sealing of the port.
8. Check of the temperature of the probe.
9. Sampling.
10. Measuring the CO2 concentration.
11. Recording of the data in Figure 4.1.
A final leak check of the train is always performed after samp-
ling.
4.3.1 Preparation and/or Addition of Absorbing Reagents to
Collection System - Absorbing reagents can be prepared on site,
if necessary, according to the directions in Subsection 1.4.1.
1. Use a pipette or a graduated cylinder to introduce 200 ml
of alkaline permanganate (KMnO./NaOH) solution into each of the
three impingers. l
2. Place in the sampling train a drying tube that has new or
regenerated silica gel.
4.3.2 Assembling the Sampling Train - After assembling the
sampling train as shown in Figure 1.2, perform the following:
1. Adjust probe heater to operating temperature. Place
crushed ice and water around the impingers.
2. Leak check the sampling train just prior to use at the
sampling site (not mandatory) by temporarily attaching a
rotameter (capacity of 0 to 40 cc/min) to the outlet of the dry
gas meter and placing a vacuum gauge at or near the probe inlet.
Plug the probe inlet, pull a vacuum of at least 250 mm (10 in.)
Hg, and note the flow rate indicated by the rotameter. "A leakage
rate _< 2% of the average sampling rate is acceptable. Note:
Carefully release the probe inlet plug before turning off the
pump. It is suggested (but not mandatory) that the pump be leak
checked separately, either prior to or after the sampling run.
If prior to the run, the pump leak check shall precede -the leak
check of the sampling train. If after, the pump leak check shall
follow the train leak check. To leak check the pump, proceed as
follows. Disconnect the drying tube from "the probe impinger
assembly. Pull a vacuum of 250 mm (10 in.) Hg. Plug or pinch
off the outlet of the flow meter, and then turn off the pump.
The vacuum should remain stable for at least 30 seconds.
3. Place a loosely packed filter of glass wool in the end of
the probe, and connect the probe to the first impinger.
4.3.3 Rotameter Setting Check (Optional) - After leak checking
the sampling train, disconnect the probe from the first impinger.
-------
o
Section No. 3.15.4
Date April 16, 1986
Page 4
and connect the filter (optional). The filter is a tube
containing approximately 20 g of 5-Angstrom molecular sieve to
remove the NO from the ambient air. Start the pump, and adjust
the flow to tne rotameter setting to be used during the sampling
run. After the flow has stablized, start measuring the volume
sampled, as recorded by the dry gas meter and the sampling time.
Collect sufficient volume to measure accurately the flow rate,
and calculate the flow rate. The average flow rat© must be less
than 500 cc/min for the sample to be valid; therefore, it is
recommended that the flow rate be checked as above prior to each
run. Record the sampling rate on the data form.
4.3.4 Sampling (Constant Rate) - Sampling is performed at a
constant rate ofbetween 400 and 500 cc/min as indicated by the
rotameter during the entire sampling run. The procedure is as
follows:
1. Record the initial dry gas meter readings, barometer
reading, and other data as indicated in Figure 4.1. Double check
the dry gas meter reading.
2. Position the tip of the probe at the sampling point,
connect the probe to the first impinger, and start the pump.
Warning; If the stack is under a negative pressure of >250 mm /~~~\
(10 in7) H2O while disconnected from the impinger, the probe ( )
should be positioned at the sampling point, the sample pump —^
turned on, and then the probe immediately connected to the
impinger to prevent the impinger solutions from being siphoned
backwards.
3. Adjust the sample flow to the preselected flow rate (400
to 500 cc/min) as indicated by the rotameter.
4. Maintain a constant rate within 10% during the entire
sampling run, and take readings .(dry gas meter, temperatures at
dry gas meter, and rate meter) at least ©very 5 minutes.
5. Refer to emission standards for minimum sampling time
and/or volume. (For example, the Federal standard for fpssil
fuel-fired steam generators specifies a minimum sampling time of
60 minutes; for relative accuracy tests, when the SO^ concen-
tration is greater than 1200 ppm, the sampling time should be 30
minutes. ) A quick calculation can be made after half the
sampling time to guarantee that the sampling rate will not exceed
500 cc/min.
6. During sampling, measure the CO,, content of the stack gas
near the sampling point using Method 3. The single-point grab
sampling procedure is adequate, provided the measurements are
made at least throe times (near the start, midway, and before /""N
theend of a run) and provided the average CO2 concentration is f j
computed. An Orsat (which is highly recommended) or Fyrite ^—
-------
analyzer may be used for this analysis.
recorded on the data form (Figure 4.1).
Section No. 3.15.4
Date April 16, 1986
Page 5
The results should be
7. Turn off the pump at the conclusion of each run, remove
the probe from the stack, and record the final readings. Warn-
ing: Again, if the stack is under negative pressure, disconnect
the probe first, and turn off the pump immediately thereafter.
8. Conduct a leak
(mandatory).
check, as described in Subsection 4.3.2
9. Calculate the sampling rate. The sample volume (AV ) for
each point should be within 10% of the average sampling volume
for all points, and the average sampling rate for the test should
be less than 500 cc/min. If the average sampling rate exceeds
500 cc/min, the sample collection efficiency may be affected.
4.4 Sample Recovery
Method 7D requires transfer of the impinger contents and the
connector washings to a polyethylene storage container. This
transfer should be done in the "laboratory" area to prevent
contamination of the test sample.
After completing the final leak check, disconnect the
impingers, and transport them to the cleanup area. Cap off the
impinger section with the use of polyethylene or equivalent caps
before transport to the cleanup area. Transfer the contents of
the impingers into a labeled, leak-free polyethylene sample
bottle. Rinse the three impingers a couple of times and the
connecting tubes once with 3- to 15-ml portions of water. Add
these washings to the same sample bottle, and mark the fluid
level on the side. Place about 1OO ml of the absorbing reagent
(KMnO./NaOH) in a polyethylene bottle, and label it for use as a
blank during sample analysis (once for each test). An example of
a sample label is shown in Figure 4.2.
Plant Ac-nvt Potyts Pfert^-
Site /$o/ 6z.r No. 3 San
Date 3/A5V84 Run
Front rinse 1 1 Front filter
Back rinse 1 1 Back filter
Solution KMnO^ / PJ&OH
Volume: Initial (pOOtiU—
Cleanup by rfed L£>cit,r
City Co&( fzwdt MT"
tple type A/Oy
L number A-P~ 1
1 Front solution 1 1
1 Bank solution ^
Level marked ^ m
Final 6>4-2- tuL- ^
0)
K
Figure 4.2. Example of a sample label.
-------
Section No. 3.15.4 S~\
Date April 16, 1986
Page 6
4.5 Sample Logistics (Data) and Packing Equipment
The sampling and sample recovery procedures are followed
until the required number of runs are completed. Log all data on
the Sample Recovery and Integrity Data Form, Figure 4.3. If the
impingers, and connectors are to be used in the next test, they
should be rinsed with water, and a new drying tube should be
inserted into the sampling trian. At the completion of the test:
1. Check all sample containers for proper labeling (time,
date, location, number of test, and any other pertinent documen-
tation). Be sure that a blank has been taken.
2. Record all data collected during the field test in
duplicate by using carbon paper or by using data forms and a
field laboratory notebook. One set of data should be mailed to
the base laboratory, given to another team member, or given to
the Agency. Hand carrying the other set (not mandatory) can
prevent a very costly and embarrassing mistake.
3. Examine all sample containers and sampling equipment for
damage, and pack them for shipment to the base laboratory, being
careful to label all shipping containers to prevent loss of
samples or equipment.
4. Make a quick check of the sampling and sample recovery
procedures using the data form, Figure 4.4.
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.15.4
Date April 16, 1986
Page 7
Plant
ro
Sampling location £>t>f(£*' /(£,.
Field Data Checks
Sample recovery personnel
Person with direct responsibility for recovered samples
Sample
number
1
2
3
Blank
Sample
identification
number
W-l
Date
of
recovery
3//S~/64
/ '
Liquid
level
marked
ix^
Stored
in locked
container
^
Remarks
Signature of field sample trustee
Laboratory Data Checks
Lab person with direct responsibility for recovered samples
Date recovered samples received
Analyst
Sample
number
1
2
3
Blank
Sample
identi f icat ion
number
frf-l
Date
of
analysis
3//&/M
Liquid
level
marked
f^
Stored
in locked
container
^^
-
Remarks
Signature of lab sample trustee
Figure 4.3. Sample recovery and integ
-------
Section No. 3.15.4
Date April 16, 1986
Page 8
Sampling
Impinger contents properly selected, measured, and placed in
impingers?* \/_
Impinger Contents/Parameters*
1st: 200 ml of KMnO4/NaOH .X
2nd: 200 ml of KMnO4/NaOH
3rd: 200 ml of KMn04/NaOH
Drying tube: 6- to 16-mesh silica gel
Probe heat at proper level?*
Crushed ice around impingers? S?0 '
*
Pretest leak check at 250 m
Leakage rate? _ 0,00 4-
7
Pretest leak check at 250 mm (10 in.) Hg?
Check of rotameter setting? ^.ST c-c-/**-!*- C J
Probe placed at proper sampling point?
Flow rate constant at approximately 450 cc/min?*
CC> concentration measured?*
Posttest leak check at 250 mm (10 in.) Hg?*
Leakage rate? _ 0. OO (0 £-/
Sample Recovery
Contents of impingers placed in polyethylene bottles?
Fluid level marked?*
Sample containers sealed and identified?* ^
* Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
Figure 4.4. On-site measurements. ( )
.•/£*'
-------
-Section No. 3."
Date April 16,
Page 9
Table 4.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR ON-SITE MEASUREMENT CHECKS
Activity
Acceptance limits
Frequency and isethod
of measurement
•Action if
requirements
are not net
Preparing and/
or adding
absorbing
reagents
Add 200 ml of KMnOj./
NaOH to the impingers
Add 40.0 g of KMnOj. and
20.0 g of NaOH to 940 ol
of water
Reassemble col-
lection system
Assembling
the sampling
train
1. Assemble to speci-
fications in Fig. 1.2
2. A leakage rate
of <2% of the average
sampling rate
1. Before each sampling
run
2. Leak check before
sampling (recoonended) by
attaching a rotameter to
dry gas meter outlet,
placing a vacuun gauge
at or near probe inlet,
and pulling a vacuum
of > 250 mm (10 in.) Hg
1. Reassenble
2. Correct the
leak
Sampling (con-
stant rate)
1. Within 10% of
constant rate
2. Minimum accepta-
ble time is -60 min
and sampling rate
less than 500 cc/min
3. Less than 2% leak-
age rate at 250 mm
(10 in.) Hg
4. Determine CO,
content
1. Calculate % devia-
tion for each sample
using equation in
Fig. 4.1
2. Make a quick calcu-
lation prior to comple-
tion and an exact calcu-
lation after cospletion
3- Leak check after
sampling run (mandatory);
use same procedure
as above
1. Repeat the
sampling, or
obtain accep-
tance froa a
representative
of the
Administrator
2. As above
4.
using Method 3
Measure CQ~ content
3- As above
As above
(continued)
-------
Section No. 3.15-4
Date April 16, 1986
Page 10
o
Table
(continued)
Activity
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requi rements
are not met
Sample logistics
(data) and
packing of
equipment
1. All data are re-
corded correctly
2. All equipment ex-
amined for damage and
labeled for shipment
3. All sample con-
tainers properly
labeled and packaged
1. Visually check upon
completion of each run
and before packing
2. As above
3. Visually check upon
completion of test
1. Complete
the data form
2. Redo test
if damage
occurred during
testing
3. Correct uhen
possible
O
o
-------
Section No. 3.15.5
Date April 16, 1986
Page 1
5.0 POSTSAMPLING OPERATIONS
The postsampling operations for Method 7D include an apparat-
us check, a barometer check, sample preparation, and sample
analysis by ion chromatography. The procedures for the apparatus
check and the barometer check are the same as in Method 6. These
procedures are detailed in Section 3.5.5 in the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume III and
are not discussed here. The procedures for sample preparation
and sample analysis are described here. Table 5.1 provides a
checklist summarizing the postsampling procedures.
5.1 Sample Preparation
Sample preparation should not be started until the required
36-hour conversion time has elapsed for complete, .conversion of
NO2~ to NO.-". When using Method 7D for relative accuracy testing
of continuous emission monitors, the sample can be prepared
immediately if the nitrite in the sample is quantitated using the
procedures described in Section 5.2. The liquid level in the
sample container should be checked to determine if sample has
been lost during shipment. If a loss has occured, the
appropriate steps should be taken to correct for the loss. The
sample is prepared for ion chromatography by precipitating the
excess permanganate as manganese dioxide (MnO2). A 5% (v/v)
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) solution is used to reduce the
permanganate to Mn02• The MnO2 precipitate is removed by vacuum
filtration and the filtered solution is volumetrically diluted
prior to chromatographic analysis.
5.1.1 Sample Loss Determination and Correction - Before preparing
the sample, it must be allowed the full 36-hour conversion time.
Compare the liquid level in the sample container to the mark on
the container. If a noticeable amount of sample has been lost,
use the following procedure for correcting the sample volume:
1. Mark the new level of liquid on the sample container.
2. Transfer the sample to a 1-liter volumetric flask (V . ),
and rinse the container with water. soj.n
3. Fill the sample container with water to the initial sample
level. Transfer the water to a graduated cylinder, and determine
the original sample volume (vsoln )•
4. Fill the sample container with water to the final sample
level. Transfer the water to a graduated cylinder, and determine
the final sample volume (Vgoln ).
5. If V____ is less than V__n_ , correct the sample volume
soxn^ soj.n •
(V oln) by using Equation 5-1:
''"' /•••
-------
Section No. 3.15.5
Date April 16, 1986
Page 2
o
V
soln
= V
V
soln
soln,
Equation 5-1
where:
V
soln^
V
soln
V
soln
sample volume to be used for calculations, ml,
volumetric flask volume, ml,
V . . ,«? initial sample volume placed in sample container, ml,
SOJ-ni and
V = final sample volume removed from container, ml.
soj.n *.
6. Both the corrected and uncorrected values should be sub-
mitted in the test report to the Agency.
5.1.2 Permanganate Precipitation and Filtration - After the
required 36-hour conversion period for the sample has elapsed and
the sample container has been checked for sample loss, the sample
can be quantitatively transfered to a 1-liter volumetric flask.
(If the correction for sample loss has already been made, the
sample should already be in a 1-liter volumetric flask.) The
procedure for precipitating the excess permanganate is as
follows:
O
1. Dilute the sample in a 1-liter volumetric
to volume with reagent water, and mix well.
flask
2. Take a 50-ml aliquot (va) °f the sample from the 1-liter
volumetric flask, and transfer tfie aliquot to a 250-ml Erlenmeyer
flask containing a Teflon-coated stirring bar. If the N0_
concentration is low, a 100-ml aliquot may
the instrument response.
be taken to increase
3. Stir,the sample as fast as possible without splashing any
of the sample out of the flask.
4. Add a 5% H202 solution in 5-ml portions while stirring
until the permanganate color disappears.
5. Stop stirring and allow the precipitated manganese
dioxide to settle. If the solution is clear, then enough H20_
has been added. If the permanganate color persists in rhe
solution, then continue the H2O2 addition in 5-ml portions until
a clear solution is produced after settling.
6. Assemble the Buchner funnel and filter flask. The spout
of the Buchner funnel may be fitted with a length of Teflon
tubing to minimize the probability of sample loss by aspiration
during filtration.
O
-------
I
Section No. 3.15.5
Date April 16, 1986
Page 3
7. Place a piece of GF/C filter paper (or an equivalent type
of filter paper) in the Buchner funnel. Wet the paper with
water, and seal the filter by applying a vacuum to the flask.
8. Quantitatively transfer the precipitated sample solution
to the filter, and filter the solution. Wash the Erlenmeyer
flask and the solid material on the filter with water four times,
and collect the washings with the filtered solution.
9. Quantitatively transfer the filtered solution from the
filter flask to a 250-ml volumetric flask (V.). Dilute to volume
with water.
10. Prepare a reagent blank by repeating steps 2 through 9
on a diluted sample of the alkaline-permanganate absorbing
solution. Dilute 60 ml of the absorbing solution to 100 ml with
water, and use 50 ml in step 2.
5.2 Sample Analysis by Ion Chromatography
For Method 7D, the basic components and the operation of the
ion chromatograph are the same as for Method 7A. A discussion of
the ion chromatograph can be found in Section 3.14.2 of Method
7A. The analyst should be familiar with the operator's manual
for his particular ion chromatograph system. In this section,
the preparation of calibration standards, the use of quality
assurance audit samples, the analysis procedure, and the data
reduction and reporting are described.
5.2.1 Preparation of Calibration Standards - The accuracy of the
ion chromatographic analysis, as in any analysis, depends
directly on the accuracy of the prepared calibration standards.
The use of proper pipetting procedures, described in Method 7A,
Section 3.14.5, and a properly dried, reagent grade standard are
necessary to obtain quality results from the analysis. The
preparation of the NO« calibration standards is as follows:
1. Dry approximately 15 g of potassium nitrate (KNO3) in an
oven at 105 to 110 C for 2 hours. (Sodium nitrate can also be
used provided the difference in the formula weight is considered
in the subsequent calculations.) Allow the dried KNO^ "to cool to
room temperature in a desiccator before weighing.
2. Calibrate an analytical balance with a 5-g Class-S
calibration weight and a 10-g Class-S calibration weight to
within 2 mg. Accurately weigh 9 to 10 g of dried KN03 to within
0.1 mg.
3. Dissolve in reagent water, and dilute to 1 liter in a
Class-A volumetric flask. Calculate the exact N03~ concentration
using the following formula:
-------
o
Section No. 3.15.5
Date April 16, 1986
Page 4
vg NO ~/ml = g of KNO- x 103 62'01 Equation 5-2
J d 101.1
The stock standard solution should be stable for 2 months if
precautions, such as refrigeration, are used to prevent decom-
position by nitrate-utilizing microorganisms.
4. Prepare a fresh working standard solution for each set of
analyses by pipetting 5 ml of stock standard solution into a
200-ml Class-A volumetric flask. Dilute to volume with water.
5. Prepare a series of four calibration standards from the
fresh working standard solution. Pipet 1.0 ml, 3.0 ml, 5.0 nl,
and 10.0 ml into a series of four 100-ml Class-A volumetric
flasks. Dilute to volume with reagent water. The concentration
of the calibration standards made from a 9.7823 g KNO-/liter
(6000 yg NO ~/ml) stock standard solution would be 1.5, 4.5, 7.5,
and 15.0 yg NO- /ml.
The calibration standard concentrations cited above are used in
the example employing Figure 5.1, the analytical data form for
analysis of calibration standards.
The calibration standards for nitrite quantitation are (]
prepared when Method 7D is used for relative accuracy testing of \ J
continuous emission monitors. A stock N02~ standard solution is
(1) prepared with NaN02 of known purity or (2) analyzed before
use. Do not oven dry the NaN02. Dissolve 52.5 mg of NaN02 in
water and dilute to volume in a 250-ml Class-A volumetric flask.
A series of four calibration standards with NO2~ concentrations
of 1.4, 4.2, 7.0, and 14.0 g N02~/ml are prepared by pipetting
1.0, 3.0, 5.0, and 10 ml of stocR N02~_standard into four 100-nl
Class-A volumetric flasks. The N02" calibration standards are
diluted to volume with water.
5.2.2 Quality Assurance Audit Samples - The accuracy of the cal-
ibration standards can be assessed by analyzing nitrate standard
solutions prepared by an outside laboratory with the concentra-
tions unknown to the analyst. For making compliance determina-
tions, a set of two Quality Assurance Audit Samples are obtained
from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental
Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Quality Assurance Division, Source
Branch, Mail Drop 77A, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. (The
analyst should notify the Quality Assurance Officer or the
responsible enforcement agency at least 30 days in advance of the
need for quality assurance samples. The analyst must also
specify that the quality assurance samples are for Method 7D.)
The concentrations of the quality assurance samples determined by
the analyst must be within 10% of the actual concentrations of
the same samples.
o
-------
Plant
Date
rrcna. re
PU-h
Location
Section No. 3.15.5
Date April 16, 1986
Page 5
/\Jo . 3
3//6>
Analys t
'. 'S-ft/ns
Standard
identifier
Std 1
Std 2
Std 3
Std 4
Standard
concentration (x)
(yg/ml N03 )
AS-
4..T
7.ST
/f.d
Insl
peak
1
20
££T
11
m
b rumen
heigh
2
ZO
&
7
mm or area count
yg NO ~/ml
x = standard concentration (yg NO '/ml) = A_
m = calibration curve slope
b = I = intercept term (mm or area count) = —().
Predicted Standard Concentration (P)
P (u NO ~/ l^ - ^verage Instrument Response (y) - Intercept (I)
•* , Calibration Curve Slope (m)
P (for first standard) =
= (
) =
yg NO-"/ml
/3. 6^/75"
Deviation
Deviation (%) = P (US NO^/ml) - x (yg NO^/ml)
x fo g NO ~/mL)
Deviation
(of first set / / 5-4
of standards) =
loo? =
/.5
Figure 5-1- Analytical data form for analyses of calibration standards.
-------
o
Section No. 3.15.5
Date April 16, 1986
Page 6
5.2.3. Ion Chromatographic Analysis - The selection of the ion
chromatographic conditions depends on the particular ion
chromatograph system available to the analyst. The selection of
eluents for ion chromatography depends on the method of detection
used. For suppressed ion chromatography the following conditions
have been used successfully:
1. A 0.003M NaHC(Xj/0.0024M Na2CO3 eluent solution is prepared
by dissolving 1.008 g of NaHCCXs and 1.018 of NaoCO^ in water and
diluting to 4 liters. * *
2. The full-scale detection range is set at 3 vMHO, and a
0.5-ml sample loop is used.
3. A flow rate of 2.5 ml/min gives a NO ~ retention time of
approximately 15 minutes depending on the type of column used.
Non-suppressed ion chromatography and ion-pairing chromato-
graphy may also be used provided baseline separation of NO3~ and
SO^ separation and detection of N02~ are obtained (see Figure
5.2). Packed-bed suppression columns are not recommended for
quantifying NO2~ when using Method 7D for relative accuracy
testing.
The recommended procedure for the ion chromatographic
analysis is as follows:
1. Establish a stable baseline. Inject a samgle of water, and
observe the chromatogram to see whether any NCU elutes. Repeat
the water injection until N03 is not_ ooserved on the
chromatogram. If, after 5 injections, a N03~ peak is still seen,
the water source should be checked for contamination.
2. Inject samples in the following order: calibration
standards, reagent blank, field samples, calibration standards,
reagent blank, field samples, calibration standards. The
injection volumes for all the standards and samples should be the
same.
3. The chromatograms should be documented with the sample
identification, injection point, injection volume, nitrate
retention time, eluent flow rate, detector sensitivity setting,
and recorder chart speed.
4. Manually measure the N03~ peak height or determine the N03
peak area with an electronic integrator.
5.2.4 Data Reduction and Reporting - The details of the data
reduction procedure are discussed in Section 3.15.6. The proce-
dures for calculating a response factor from the calibration /"N
standards by linear regression and for calculating the % devia- \ )
tion on each standard from the predicted value are as follows:
o
-------
Section No. 3.15.5
Date April 16, 1986
Page 7
Flow Rate: 1.5 ml/zain
Detector: 30 S full scale
Injection: 50 vl
3.3 minutes
Inject
Figure 5.2. Example of chromatogram having adequate documentation.
-------
Section No. 3.15.5
Date April 16, 1986
Page 8
1. Use the analytical date form (see Figure 5.1) for cal-
culating the linear regression equation based on the calibration
standards.
2. Record the calculated concentrations for the four cali-
bration standards (x) on the data sheet. Determine the average
value for the instrument response (y) for NO,," (peak height or
area under the peak) from the three determinations for each of
the four calibration standards.
3. Plot the average values for the instrument response for
the calibration standards against the corresponding calculated
concentrations of the calibration standards. Draw a smooth curve
through the points without forcing the curve through zero. The
curve should be linear.
4. Determine the slope (m) and the intercept term (b or I)
for the linear calibration curve by linear regression. Many
scientific calculators are capable of performing linear
regression.
5. Calculate the predicted standard concentration (P) for
each calibration standard using the following equation:
Equation 5-3
P( a/ml NO ~) Average Instrument Response (y) - Intercept (I)
\v g/ £ ) Calibration Curve Slope (m)
6. Calculate the percent deviation of each calibration
standard (x) from the predicted value using the following
equation (optional):
Equation 5-4
% Deviation = P (ug N03 /ml) -. x (ug N03 ml) ^ 1QO
x (vig NO3~/ml)
If any standard deviates from the standard curve by more than
+7%, the problem should be investigated.
The concentration of the field samples, the reagent blank,
and the quality assurance samples are calculated by the sane
procedure used to calculate the predicted values for the
calibration standards. Use the data form shown in Figure 5.3 for
the analysis of field samples. The procedure is as follows:
1. Determine the instrument response factor for the sample
and calculate the sample concentration using Equation 5-3.
Calculate the average value for the two determinations made on
each sample.
o
o
43'
-------
Section No. 3.15.5
Date .April 16. 1986
Page 9
Date samples received 3 /l(f I&4' Date samples analyzed 3 / 16 / &4
Plant Acme Porter Tlswrb _ Run number (s) AP~ I. 2.. £
. S-f-e/n s
~' ~~~
Location
/f.7""
-
Analyst
.
~ <-j — j-ui- ~' -~~~ -~
Calibration curve slope (m) /3.6/75^ Intercept term (I) — £>,
Field
sample
number
AH
Af~l
AW
Field
Blank
Analysis
number
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
Instrument
response (y)
(mm or area counts)
7f /**/*?
78wm
6>4-ww
(p2.MH[
72 turn
~JO wn\
5~ww
S~Kt4\
Concentration of
analysis sample
(Vg/ml N03 )
^.B
.577
1-.7
. 4-.(r
573
5:^
0.51
0.31
Average
Concentration of
analysis sample
(vg/ml N03 )
S= 5~7S-
s= f.^r
S = ^Z^
B= A3?
Deviation
(^)
0*67
I.I
6.9S~
A/A
Concentration of
Analysis Sample
(yg N03"/ml)
Concentration
(of first sample)
Deviation
(*)
Deviation
(of first
standard set)
Instrument Response (y) - Intercept (I)
Calibration Curve Slope (m)
Sample Concentration - Average Concentration IQQ%
Average Concentration
- (
>
Figure 5.3. NO laboratory data form for analyses of field samples.
-------
Section No. 3.15.5
Date April 16, 1986
Page 10
2. Calculate the percent deviation of the concentration
measured for each individual sample from the average of the
concentrations measured for the duplicate samples using the
following equation:
Equation 5-5
% Deviation = Sample Concentration - Average Concentration 1QO
Average Concentration
The percent deviation for a sample must be within 5% of the
average value before the analysis can be considered valid.
The data reduction procedures described above for N03~
analysis can be used for N0« analysis when using Method 7D for
relative accuracy testing of continuous emission monitors.
The main parameters of the analytical procedures may be
checked during or after the analysis, using the posttest
operations form (Figure 5.4).
o
o
'JO
-------
Section No. 3.15.5
Date April 16, 1986
Page 11
Reagents
Potassium nitrate dried at 105° to 110°C for a minimum
of 2 hours before use?
Stock standard solution (potassium nitrate) less than 2 months
old? S
Sample Preparation
Has liquid level noticeably changed?* /vo
Original volume Corrected volume
Analysis
Standard calibration curve prepared?* "_ __
All calibration points within 7 percent of linear calibration
curve (optional) ?
Reagent blanks made from absorbing solution?
Same injection volume for both standards and samples? _
Duplicate sample values agree within 5 percent of their mean?
Audit sample analytical results within 10 percent of true value?
All analytical data recorded on checklist and laboratory form?
* Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
Figure 5.4. Posttest operations.
-------
Section 3-15-5
Date April 16, 19=6
Page 12
Table 5.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR SAMPLE ANALYSIS
o
Characteristics
Acceptance Limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Sample Preparation
1. Conversion
time
2. Sample loss
3. Permanganate
precipitation
Permanganate
filtration
36 hour minimum
Noticeable amount
Absence of purple
permanganate color
Absence of solids
in the filtrate
Determine sample age
Compare sample level
to mark on container
Between each 5 *&•
portion of 5% ^J^?
solution
After filtration is
complete
Hold sample in
container for 36
hours miniinin time
Correct by proce-
dure in Section
5.1.1
Continue adding
5 ml portions
of 5% H0
Refilter
O
Calibration Stan-
dards Preparation
1. ACS grade KNCL
15 g dry KNO_
Oven dry at 105 to
110°C for 2 hours;
cool in desiccator
2. Stock standard
solution
3. Calibration
standards
9 to 10 g of KNO.
accurately weighed
to 0.1 mg; dilute
to 1 liter; store
refrigerated
Standard range to
cover sample range;
maximum allowed
deviation of indi-
vidual standard
from the predicted
value is +J%
(optionalj
Calibrate analytical
balance
Use recommended volumes
of stock standard solu-
tion; calculate devia-
tion (optional) using
Equation 5-4
High bias will
occur if stan-
dard contains
moisture; redry
KN°3
Biases will occur
with poor pipet-
ting or improper
storage;
remake standard
Invalid analysis;
remake and rerun
calibration
standards
(continued)
O
-------
Section 3.15.5
Date April 16, 1986
Page 13
Table 5.1. (continued)
Characteristics
Acceptance Limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Ion Chromatograph
Analysis
1. Sample injection
device
2. Sample analysis
3. Chromatogram
documentation
k. Quality
assurance
Absence of KNO_
on chromatogram of
water injection
Individual sample
replicates within
5% of average
Include sample
identi fication,
injection point,
injection volume,
N0.,~ retention
time, eluent flow
rate, detector
sensitivity setting,
and chart speed
Analytical results
must be within 10%
of actual value
Inject reagent water
up to four times
Calculate deviation
using Equation 5~5
Visually check
Report results to
agency with sample
identification
Check water source
for contamination
Invalidate analysis
reanalyze samples
Supply missing
information
Invalidate analysis;
repeat preparation
of sample; prepare
new standards
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.15.6
Date April 16, 1986
Page 1
6.0 CALCULATIONS
Calculation errors due to procedural or mathematical mistakes
can be a large component of total system error. Therefore, it is
recommended that each set of calculations be repeated or spot-
checked, preferably by a team member other than the one who per-
formed the original calculations. If a difference greater than
typical round-off error is detected, the calculations should be
corrected. A computer program is advantageous in reducing calcu-
lation errors. If a standardized computer program is used, the
original data entry should be checked, and if differences are
observed, a new computer run should be made. Table 6.1 at the
end of this section summarizes the quality assurance activities
for calculations.
Calculations should be carried at least one extra decimal
figure beyond that of the acquired data, and should be rounded
after final calculation to two significant digits for each run or
sample. All rounding of numbers should be performed in accor-
dance with the ASTM 380-76 procedures. All calculations are then
recorded on a form such as the ones shown in Figure 6.1A and
6.IB, following the nomenclature list.
6.1 Nomenclature
The following nomenclature is used in the calculations:
V
m
Y
P
bar
'std
m
'std
V
m(std)
dry gas volume as measured by the dry gas meter,
dcm (dcf),
dry gas meter calibration factor, dimensionless,
barometric pressure, mm (in.) Hg,
standard absolute pressure, 760 mm (29.92 in.) Hg,
average dry gas meter absolute temperature, °K (°R),
standard absolute temperature, 293°K (528°R),
dry gas volume measured by the dry gas meter
corrected to standard conditions, dscm (dscf).
S
B
m
C
X
analysis of sample, yg
w
analysis of blank, vg NO3~/ml,
mass of NO,, as NO- in sample, yg,
X ^
concentration of NO as N09, dry basis, mg/dscm
(Ib/dscf), and x
correction factor.
-------
Section No. 3.15.6
Date April 16, 1986
Page 2
6.2 Calculations
o
The following are the equations used with example calculation
forms (Figures 6.1A and 6.IB) to calculate the concentration of
nitrogen oxides in the samples.
6.2.1 Sample Volume - Calculate the sample volume on a dry basis
at standard conditions (760 mm (29.92 in.) Hg and 293°K (528 R)
using Equation 6-1.
T p v p Equation 6-1
Vm(std) = Vm *X^ Y td par = K! (X) Y m bar
where: Tm ?std Tm
X = correction factor for CO2 collection, 100
100 - %CO2 v/v ,
K., = 0.3858 K for metric units, or
mmHg
K. = 17.64 °R for English units.
in. Hg
6.2.2 Total g NOg Per Sample - Calculate the total yg of N0~
per sample using Equation 6-2.
t* n\ o*n v 100° v 46.01 o-7-in fa n\
m = (S - B) ZoU x x = o71O (S - B)
50 62.01
Equation 6-2
where:
250 = volume of prepared sample, ml,
46.01 = molecular weight of NO2~,
62.01 = molecular weight of N03~,
1000 = total volume of KMnO. solution, ml, and
50 = aliquot KMn04 / NaOH solution, ml.
6.2.3 Sample Concentration - Calculate the sample concentration
on a dry basis at standard conditions using Equation 6-3.
C = K
o
V , . , x Equation 6-3
where: m(std) .
_q
K0 = 10 mg/ug for metric units, or — ^
O
K2 = 2.205 x 10"9 Ib/yg for English units. ^-^
/&
-------
Section No. 3.15.6
Date April 16, 1966
Page 3
Sample Volume
dcf, Y= /. 0 2- O, x = I.I
bar = 2^ 9_-_4^ J_ in. Hg, T = 5~
Vm(std) = 17-64 x Y m bar = -L'-L — -~L dscf Equation 6-1
Tm
Total yg N02 Per Sample
<"" 7 <~ r> 2 ci
m = 3710 (S - B) =_/.jf._6__^__(£_vgof N02 Equation 6-2
Sample Concentration
— Q m *2 G / £) —*?
C = 2.205 x 10 y = _£.-__/ _"_ &_ x 10 ° Ib/dscf
m(std) Equation 6-3
Sample Concentration in ppm
ppm NO., = 8.375 x 10 C = 332- ppm NO., Equation 6-4
£t '~ ' ' ~ l-r.-TB- J £t
Figure 6.1A. Nitrogen oxide calculation form (English units).
/•'V7
-------
Section No- 3.15.6
Date April 16, 1986
Page 4
Sample Volume
o
vm = 0.0 .2 _Z_ 0_ l_ ]_ m3, Y = _/_._£ _£_ 0_, x = J_.J_ ±_ 4_.
"bar ~ -i- _L _£.
' Tm =
'K
Vm(std) = °-3858 x Y Vin Pbar = 0.0 ^ J_
m •
dscm Equation 6-1
Total vg N02 Per Sample
S = _. _ _ v g/ml , B = _
g/ml
m = 3710 (S - B)
Equation 6-2
C = 10
'3
m(std)
Sample Concentration
_>__ mg N02/dscm
Equation 6-3
O
Sample Concentration in ppm
ppm N0« = 0.5228 C = 332- ppm N00
« ~' "^^ ^
Equation 6-4
Figure 6.IB. Nitrogen oxide calculation form (metric units).
O
-------
Section No. 3.15.6
Date October 23, ig85
Page 5
Table 6.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR CALCULATIONS
Charac teris tics
Sample volume
calculation
Sample mass
calculation
'Sample concen-
tration
Calculation
check
Document and
report re-
sults
Acceptance limits
All data available;
calculations correct
within round-off error
As above
As above
Original and checked
calculations agree
within round-off error
All data available;
calculations correct
within round-off error
Frequency and method
of measurement
For each sample, exam-
ine the data form
As above
As above
For each sample, per-
. form independent cal-
culations
For each sample, exam-
ine the data form
Action if
requirements
are not met
Complete the
data, or void
the sample
As above
As above
Check and
correct all data
Complete the
data, or void
the sample
,
V.
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.15.7
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
7.0 MAINTENANCE
The normal use of emission-testing equipment subjects it to cor-
rosive gases, extremes in temperature, vibration, and shock. Keeping
the equipment in good operating order over an extended period of time
requires knowledge of the equipment and a program of routine3main-
tenance which is performed quarterly or after 2830 L (100 ft ) of
operation, whichever is greater. In addition to the quarterly main-
tenance, a yearly cleaning of the entire meter box is recommended.
Maintenance procedures for the various components are summarized in
Table 7.1 at the end of the section. The following procedures are
not required, but are recommended to increase the reliability of the
equipment.
In the present commercial sampling train, several types of pumps
are used; the two' most common are the fiber vane pump with in-line
oiler and the diaphragm pump. The fiber vane pump requires a
periodic check of the oiler Jar. Its contents should be translucent;
the oil should be changed if not translucent. Use the oil specified
by the manufacturer. If none is specified, use SAE-10 nondetergent
oil. Whenever the fiber vane pump starts to run erratically or
during the yearly disassembly, the head should be removed and the
fiber vanes changed. Erratic operation of the diaphragm pump is
normally due to either a bad diaphragm (causing leakage) or to
malfunctions of the valves, which should be cleaned annually by
complete disassembly.
7.2 Dry Gas Meter
The dry gas meter should be checked for excess oil or corrosion
of the components by removing the top plate every 3 months. The
meter should be disassembled and all components cleaned and checked
whenever the rotation of the dials is erratic, whenever the meter
will not calibrate properly over the required flow rate range, and
during the yearly maintenance.
7.3 Rotameter
The rotameter should be disassembled and cleaned according to the
manufacturer's instructions using only recommended cleaning fluids
every 3 months or upon erratic operation.
7.4 Sampling Train
All remaining sampling train components should be visually
checked every 3 months and completely disassembled and cleaned or
replaced yearly. Many items, such as quick disconnects, should be
replaced whenever damaged rather than checked periodically.
Normally, the best procedure for maintenance in the field is to use
another entire unit such as a meter box, sample box, or umbilical
-------
Section No. 3.15.7 (]
Date July 1, 1986 V_/
Page 2
cord (the hose that connects the sample box and meter box) rather
than replacing individual components.
7.5 Ion chromatograph
Maintenance activities and schedules for ion chromatographs are
make and model specific. It is therefore recommended that the
analyst consult the operator's manual for instructions relative to
maintenance practices and procedures.
Guard columns, while not required, are recommended for use with
the ion chromatograph in order to extend column lifetime.
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.15.7
Date July 1, 1986
Page 3
Table 7.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CHECKS
Apparatus
Acceptance limits
Sample train
control con-
sole
Fiber vane pump
Diaphragm pump
Dry gas meter
Rotameter
Sampling train
Ion chroma-
tograph
No erratic behavior
In-line oiler free of
leaks
Leak-free valves
functioning properly
No excess oil, corro-
sion, or erratic rota-
tion of the dial
Clean and no erratic
behavior
No damage
See owner's manual
Frequency and method
of measurement
Routine maintenance
performed quarterly;
disassemble and clean
yearly
Periodically check
oiler jar; remove
head and change fiber
vanes
Clean valves during
yearly disassembly
Check every 3 no. for
excess oil or corrosion
by removing the top
plate; check valves and
diaphragm yearly and
whenever meter dial runs
erratically or whenever
meter will not calibrate
Clean every 3 no. or
whenever ball does not
move freely
Visually check every
3 mo.; completely dis-
assemble and clean or
replace yearly
See owner's manual
Action if
requirements
are not met
Replace parts
as needed
Replace as
needed
Replace when
leaking or mal-
functioning
Replace parts
as needed, or
replace meter
Replace
If failure
noted, use an-
other entire
meter box,
sample box,
or umbilical
cord
See owner's
manual
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.15.10
Date July 1, 1986
Page 1
10.0 REFERENCE METHOD*,**
Method TO—Determination of Nitrogen
Oxide Emission* From Stationary Sources
A tkaline-Pemanganate/Ion
Chromatographic Method
1. Applicability. Principle. Interferences.
Precision. Bias, and Stability.
1.1 Applicability. The method is
•applicable to the determination of NO,
emissions from fossil-fuel fired steam
generators, electric utility plants, nitric acid
plants, or other sources as specified in the -
regulations. The lower detectable limit is
similar to that for Method 7C. No upper limit
has been established however, when using
the recommended sampling conditions, the
method has been found to collect NO,
emissions quantitatively up to 1782 mg/NO,/
m». as NO, (932 pm NO.).
' 12 Principle. An integrated gas sample is
extracted from the stack and collected in
alkaline-potassium permanganate solution;
NO, (NO 4-NOi) emissions are oxidized to
NO,-, Then NO>- is analyzed by ion
chromatography.
1.3 Interferences. Possible interferences
are SOj and NH». High concentrations of SOj
could interfere because SO, consumes MnO«-
(as does NO,) and. therefore, could reduce
the NO, collection efficiency. However, when
sampling emissions from a coal-fired electric
utility plant burning 2.1-percent sulfur coal
with no control of SO, emission*, collection
efficiency was not reduced. In fact.
calculations show that sampling 3000 ppm
SO, will reduce the MnO.- concentration by
only 5 percent if all the SO, is consumed in
the first impinger.
NHj is slowly oxidized to N0»- by the
absorbing solution. At 100 ppm NH» in the
gas stream, an interference of 6 ppm NO, (11
mg NOs/m") was observed when the sample
was analyzed 10 days after collection.
Therefore, the method may not be applicable
to plants using NH> injection to control NO,
emissions unless means are taken to correct
the results. An equation has been developed
to allow quantitation of the interference and
is discussed in Citation 4 of the bibliography.
1.4 Precision and Bias. The method does
not exhibit any bias relative to Method 7. The
within-laboratory relative standard deviation
for a single measurement was approximately
6 percent at 200 to 270 ppm NO,.
13 Stability. Collected samples are stable
for at least 4 weeks.
2. Apparatus.
2.1 Sampling and Sample Recovery. The
sampling train is the same as in Figure 7C-1
of Method 7C. Component parts are the same ' "
as in Method 7C. Section'2.1.
*Method 7C is reproduced in this section in addition to Method 7D
since the latter refers extensively to Method 7C and Method 7C
is not reproduced elsewhere in this Handbook.
** Federal Register, Volume 49, No. 189, September 27, 1984.
t
"~"i ^ "
2.2 Sample Preparation and Analysis,
2.2.1 Magnetic Stirrer. With 25- by 10-mm
Teflon-coated stirring bars.
2^2 Filtering Flask. 500-ml capacity with
sidearm.
2^.3 Buchner Funnel. 75-mm ID. The
spout equipped with a 13-mm ID by 90-mm
long pjece of Teflon'tubing to minimize
possibility of aspirating sample solution
during filtration.
2^.4 Filter Pnper. Whatman GF/C. 7.0-cm
diameter.
2.2.5 Stirring Rods.
Volumetric Flask. 250-ml.
Pipettes. Class A.
Erlenmeyer Flasks. 250-ml.
Ion Chromatograph. Equipped with
an anion separator column to separate NOt-,
a H* suppressor, and*necessary auxiliary
equipment. Nonsuppressed and other forms
of ion chromatography may also be used
provided that adequate resolution of NOj- is
obtained. The system must also be able to
resolve and detect NO^.
3. Reagents.
Unless otherwise indicated, all reagents
should conform to the specifications
established by the Committee on Analytical
Reagents of the American Chemical Society,
where such specifications are available;
otherwise, use the best available grade.
3.1 Sampling.
3.1.1 Water. Deionized distilled to
conform to ASTM specification D 1193-74.
Type 3 (incorporated by reference—see
§ 60.17).
3.1.2 Potassium Permanganate. 4.0 Percent
(w/w). Sodium Hydroxide. 2.0 Percent (w/w).
Dissolve 40.0 g of KMnO, and 20.0 g of NaOH
in 940 ml of water.
3.2 Sample Preparation and Analysis.
3.2.1 Water. Same as in Section 3.1.1.
3.2J? Hydrogen Peroxide. 5 Percent. Dilute
30 percent HiO, 1:5 (v/v) with water.
3.2J Blank Solution. Dissolve 2.4 g of
KMnO. and 1.2 g of NaOH in 63 ml of water.
Alternatively, dilute 60 ml of KMnO./NaOH
solution to 100 ml.
3.2.4 KNO» Standard Solution. Dry
KNOj at 110 ' C for 2 hours, and cool in a
desiccator. Accurately weigh 9 to 10 g of
KNO> to within 0.1 mg. dissolve in water, and
dilute to 1 liter. Calculate the exact NO,-
concentration from the following relationship
NOi-/m)*g of KNO, XlO'x •
62.01
101.10
-------
This solution it liable for 2 months without
preservative under laboratory conditions.
3.2.5 Eluent, 0.003 M NaHCOj/0.0024 M
NaiCO). Dissolve 1.008 g NaHCOj and 1.018 g
NaiCOj in water, and dilute to 4 liters. Other
eiuents capable of resolving nitrate ion from
sulfate and other species present may be
used.
3.2.6 Quality Assurance Audit Samples.
This is the tame as in Method 7, section 3J.9.
When requesting audit samples, specify that
they be in the appropriate concentration
range for Method 7D. '-' > v-\ .-
4. Procedure.
4.1 Sampling. This is the tame es in
Method 7C. Section 4.1.
4.2 Sample Recovery. This is the tame as
in Method 7C. Section 4.2.
4.3 Sample Preparation for Analysis. Note
the level of liquid in the sample container,
and determine whether any sample was lost
during shipment. If a noticeable amount of
leakage has occurred, the volume lost can be
determined from the difference between
initial and final solution levels, and this value
can then be used to correct the analytical
result. Quantitatively transfer the contents to
a 1-liter volumetric flask, and dilute to
volume.
Sample preparation can be started 36 hours
after collection. This time is necessary to
ensure that all NOr- is converted to NOj-.
Take a 50-ml aliquot of the sample and
blank, and transfer to 250-ml Erlenmeyer
flasks. Add a magnetic stirring bar. Adjust
the stirring rate to as fast a rate as possible
without loss of solution. Add 5 percent
HiO» in increments of approximately 5 ml
using a 5-ml pipette. When the KMnCX color
appears to have been removed, allow the
precipitate to settle, and examine the
supernatant liquid. If the liquid is clear, the
HjOj addition is complete. If the
KMuO* color persists, add more HjOi, with
stirring, until the supernatant liquid is clear.
Note.—The faster the stirring rate, the less
volume of HjOj that will be required to
remove the KMnO..) Quantitatively transfer
the mixture to a Buchner funnel contaiing
GF/C filter paper, and filter the precipitate.
The spout of the Buchner funnel should be
equipped with a 13-mm ID by 90-mm long
piece of Teflon tubing. This modification
minimizes the possibility of aspirating sample
solution during filtration. Filter the mixture
into a 500-ml filtering flask. Wash the solid
material four times with water. When
filtration is complete, wash the Teflon tubing.
quantitatively transfer the filtrate to a 250-ml
volumetric flask, and dilute to volume. The
sample and blank are now ready for
NOi analysis.
4.4 Sample Analysis. The following
chromatographic conditions are
recommended: 0.003 M NaHCOi/0.0024 M
NjuCO, eluent solution. (3.2.5). full scale
range 3 nMHO: sample loop, 0.5 ml: flow rate,
2,5 ml/rain. These conditions should give a
NO»- retention time of approximately 15
rnmutes (Figure 7D-1).
Section No. 3.15.10
Date July 1, 1986
Page 2
»
t>
TWt.0.
Fifvn 70-1. IOT n»»nl»y»» •' • trtMrtt ««•»!•
Establish a stable baseline. Inject a sample
of water, and determine if any NOr- appears
in the chromatogram. If NO>- is present.
repeat the water load/injection procedure
opproximately five times: then re-inject t
water sample, and observe the
chromatogram. When no N0»- is present, the
instrument is ready for use. Inject calibration
standards. Then inject samples and a blank.
Repeat the injection of the calibration
standards (to compensate for any drift in
response of the instrument). Measure the
NOj peak height or peak area, and determine
the sample concentration from the calibration
curve.
4.5 Audit analysis. This is the same as in
Method 7. Section 4.4
5. Calibration.
5.1 Dry Gas Metering System (DGM).
5.1.1 Initial Calibration. Same as in
Method 0. Section 5.1.1. For detailed
instructions on carrying out this calibration, it
is suggested that Section 3.5.2 of Citation 3 in
the bibliography be consulted.
5.1.2 Post-Test Calibration Check. Same
es in Method 6, Section 5.1.2.
5.2 Thermometers for DGM and
Barometer. Same as in Method 6, Section 5.2
and 5.4, respectively.
5.3 Calibration Curve for Ion
Chromatograph. Dilute a given volume (1.0 ml
or greater) of the KNO> standard solution to a
convenient volume with water, and use this
solution to prepare calibration standards.
Prepare at least four standards to cover the
range of the samples being analyzed. Use
pipettes for all additions. Run standards as
instructed in Section 4.4. Determine peak
height or area, and plot the individual values
versus concentration in ng NO>-/ml. Do not
force the curve through zero. Draw a smooth
curve through the points. The curve should be
linear. With the linear curve, use linear
regression to determine the calibration
equation.
o
O
o
-------
6. Calculations.
Carry out calculation!, retaining at least
one extra decimal figure beyond that of the
acquired data. Round off figures after final
calculation.
6.1 Sample Volume, Dry Basis. Corrected
to Standard Conditions. Same as in Method
7C, Section 6.1.
6.2 Total figNO. Per Sample.
Section No. 3.15.10
Date July 1, 1935
Page 3
1000 46.01
m-(S-B)x250x - x
50
•3710 (S-BT (Eq. 7D-1)
Where: .
m—Mass of NO,, as NO,, in sample, fig.
S—Analysis of sample, fig NOi-/ml.
B—Analysis of blank, fig NCS-/ml.
250—Volume of prepared sample, ml.
46.01—Molecular'weight of NOi-.
62.01-Molecular weight of NO,-.
1000-Total volume of KMnO4 solution, ml.
50-Aliquot KMnO4/NaOH solution, ml.
6.3 Sample Concentration.
m
C—Ka '
Where:
C—Concentration of NO, as NO>. dry basis.
mg/dr,cm.
Kj-10-»mg/ng.
V»t.u>—Dry gas volume measured by the dry
gas meter, corrected to standard
conditions, dscm.
6.4 Conversion Factors.
1.0ppm NO-1.247 mg NO/m'atSTP.
1.0 ppm NO,-1.912 mg NOj/m'at STP.
Ift'-2.832xi0-'m».
7. Quality Control.
Quality control procedures are specified in
Sections 4.1.3 (flow rate accuracy) and 4.5
(audit analysis accuracy) of Method 7C.
&.13ibliography.
1. Margeson. J.H., W.J. Mitchell, J.C. Suggs,
and M.R. Midgett. Integrated Sampling and
Analysis' Methods for Determining NO,
Emissions at Electric Utility Plants. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Research
Triangle Park. N.C. Journal of the Air
Pollution Control Association. 22.1210-1215.
1982.
2. Memorandum and attachment form J.H.
Margeson. Source Branch. Quality Assurance
Division. Environmental Monitoring Systems
Laboratory, to The Record. EPA. March 30,
1983. NHj Interference in Methods 7C and 7D.
3. Quality Assurance Handbook for Air
Pollution Measurement Systems. Volume
III—Stationary Source Specific Methods. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Research
Triangle Park. N.C. Publication No. EPA-600/
4-77-027b. August 1977.
4. Margeson. J.H.. et al. An Integrated
Method for determining NO. Emissions at
Nitric Acid Plants. Manuscript submitted to
Analytical Chemistry. April 19B4.
-------
Section No. 3.15.10
Date July 1, 1986
Page 4
o
Method 7C— Determination of Nitrogen
Oxide Emissions From Stationary Source*
Alkoline-Permonfionote/Colorimftric
Method
1. Applicability. Principle. Interferences,
Precision, Bias, and Stability.
1.1 Applicability. The method ii
applicable to the determination of NO,
emissions from fossil-fur;] fired steam
generators, electric utility plants, nitric acid
plants, or other sources as specified in the
regulations. The lower detectable limit is 13
mg NO./m', as NO, (1 ppm NO.) when
sampling at 500 cc/min for 1 hour. No upper
limit has been established: however, when
using the recommended sampling conditions
the method has been found to collect NO,
emissions quantitatively up to 1,702 mg NO,/
m>. as NO, (932 ppm NO.).
1.2 Principle. An integrated CBS sample is
extracted from the stack and collected in
alkaline-potassium permanganate solution;
NO, (NO+NO,) emissions art oxidized to
NOi- and NOj-. The NOr- is reduced to
N0»- with cadmium, and the NO»- i»
analyzed colorimetrically.
1.3 Interferences. Possible interferences
are SO, and NH». High concentration* of SO,
could interfere because SO, consumes MnO<-
(as doe* NOJ and, therefore, could reduce
the NO, collection efficiency. However, when
sampling emissions from B cout-fired electric
utility plant burning 2.1-percent sulfur coal
with no control of SO, emissions, collection
efficiency was not reduced. In fact.
calculations show that sampling 3000 ppm
SO, will reduce the MnO«- concentration by
only 5 percent If all the SO, is consumed in
the first impinger.
NHi is slowly oxidized to NOr- by the
absorbing solution. At 100 ppm NH» in the
gas stream, an interference of 6 ppn NO. (11
mg NOj/m1) was observed when the sample
was analyzed 10 days after collection.
Therefore, the method may not be applicable
to plants using NHj injection to control NO,
emissions unless means are taken to correct
the result*. An equation h«» been developed
to allow quantitalion of the interference and
is discussed In Citation 5 of the bibliography.
1.4 Precision and Bias. The method does
not exhibit any bias relative to Method 7. The
within-Laboratory relative standard deviation
for a single measurement is 2.8 and Z£
percent at 201 and 268 ppm NO,, respectively.
l.S Stability. Collected samples are stable
for at least 4 weeks.
2. Apparatus.
2.1 Sampling and Sample Recovery. The
Sampling train is shown in Figure 7C-1. and
component parts are discussed beJow.
Alternative apparatus and procedures are
allowed provided acceptable accuracy and
precision can be demonstrated.
O
REiTRicno ORIFICE tutr INCTHT
Jure* en.
D»WC »u«
( o, \
I GAS urn* y
SUICE TAMX
Figure 7C-1. tlOx sampling tr»lr
O
-------
2.1.1 Probs. BorosiUcate glus tubing.
sufficiently heated to prevent water
condensation and eqcippcd with an to-slack
or out-slack filter to remove particulate
matter (a plug of glass wool is satisfactory for
this purpose). Stainless stetl or Teflon tubing
may also be used for the probe. (Note*.
Mention of trade names or specific products
does not constitute endorsement by the US.
Environmental Protection Agency.)
2.1.2 impingers. Three restricted-orifice
glass impingers. bavins toe specifications
given in Fixture 7C-2. are required for each
sampling train. The impingers must be
connected in series with leak-free plait
connectors. Stopcock grease may be used, if
necessary, to prevent leakage. (The iinpinpets
can-be fabricated by a glasa blower until they
become available commercially.)
IJMJ
eittUJlOW: M
II-
inmc
LfCt>w
a- 1
ITS
cainui
t S
Ftfur* 1t-l. 'imrtclrt trtritt
2.1 J Glass Wool Stopcock Grease.
Drying Tube, Valve, Pump. Barometer, and
Vacuum Gauge and Rotarneter. Suns as in
Method 6, Sections 2.L3. 2.1X, 2.1.6. 2.1.7.
2.1.8. 2.1.11. and 2.1.12, respectively.
Section No. 3.15.10
Date July 1, 1986
Page 5
2.1.4 Rate Meter. Rotaraeter. or
equivalent, accurate to within 2 percent at the
selected flow rate between 400 and 500 cc/
min. For rotameters. a range of 0 to 1 liter/
mm it recommended.
2.1.5 Volume Meter. Dry gas meter
capable of measuring the cample volume,
under the sampling conditions of 400 to 500
cc/min for 60 minutes within an accuracy of 2
percent
2.1.6 Filter-To remove NO, from ambient
air. prepared by adding 20 g of a 5-angstrom
molecular sieve to a cylindrical tube. e.g.. a
polyethylene drying tube.
£l.7 Polyethylene Bottles, l-liter. for
sample recovery.
2.1.8 Funnel and Stirring Rods. For sample
recovery.
i2 Sample Preparation and Analysis.
2.2.1 Hot Plate. Stirring type with 50- by
10-mm Teflon-coated stirring ban.
2^.2 Beakers. 400-. 600-, and 1000-ml
capacities.
2.2.3 Filtering Flask. 500-ml capacity with
side arm.
2J.4 Buchner Funnel 75-mm ID, with .
apout equipped with a 13-mm ID by SO-mm
long piece of Teflon tubing to minimize
possibility of aspirating sample solution
during filtration.
2.2.S Filter Paper. Whatman GF/C, 7.0-cm
diameter.
2.2.6 Stirring Rods.
2.2.7 Volumetric Flasks. 100-. 200- or 250-,
500-, and 1000-ml capacity.
2.2.8 Watch Classes. To cover 600- and
1,000-ml beakers.
2.2.9 Graduated Cylinders. 50- and 250-ml
capacities.
Z2.10 Pipettes. Class A
2.2.11 pH Meter. To measure pH from 0.5
to 12.0
2.2.12 Burette. 50-ml with a micrometer
type stopcock. (The stopcock is Catalogue
No. 8225-1-05. Ace Glass. Inc.. Post Office
Box 096. Louisville, Kentucky 50201.) Place a
glass wool plug in bottom of burette. Cut off
burette at a height of 43 cm from the top of
plug, and have a glass blower attach a glass
funnel to top of burette such that the
diameter of the burette remains essentially
unchanged. Other means of attaching the
funnel are acceptable.
2.2.13 Glass Funnel. 75-mm ID at the top.
2.2.14 Spectrophotometer. Capable of
measuring absorbance at 540 nm. One-cm
cells are adequate.
2.2.15 Metal Thermometers. Bimetallic
thermometers, range 0 to 150 'C.
2^.16 Culture Tubes. 20-by 150-mm.
Kimax No. 45048.
2.2.17 Parafilm "M." Obtained from
American Can Company, Greenwich.
Connecticut 00330.
2.2.18 COi Measurement Equipment
Same es in Method 3.
3. Reagents.
Unless otherwise indicated, all reagents
should conform to the specifications
established by the Committee on Analytical
Reagents of the American Chemical Society,
where such specifications are available;
otherwise, use the best available grade.
-------
3.1 Sampling.
3.1.1 Water. Deionired distilled to
conform to ASTM specification D 1193-74,
Type 3 (incorporated by reference—see
J 60.17).
3.1.2 Potassium Permanganate. 4.0 percent
(w/w). Sodium Hydroxide, 2.0 percent (w/w).
Dissolve 40.0 g of KMnO. and 20.0 g of NaOH
in 940 ml of water.
3.2 Sample Preparation and Analysis.
3.2.1 Water. Same as in Section 3.1.1.
3.2.2 Sulfuric Acid. Concentrated HiSO^
3.2.3 Oxalic Acid Solution. Dissolve 48 g
of oxalic acid |(COOH)i-2HiO] in water, and
dilute to 500 ml. Do not heat the solution.
3.2.4 Sodium Hydroxide. 0.5 N. Dissolve
20 g of NaOH in water, and dilute to 1 liter.
3.2.5 Sodium Hydroxide. 10 N. Dissolve
40 g of NaOH in water and dilute to 100 ml.
3.2.6 Ethylenediamine Tetraacetic Acid
(EDTA) Solution. 6.S Percent. Dissolve 6.5 g of
EDTA (disodium salt) in water, and dilute to
100 ml. Solution is best accomplished by
using a magnetic stirrer.
3.2.7 Column Rinse Solution. Add 20 ml of
6.5 percent EDTA solution to 960 ml of water,
and adjust the pH to 11.7 to 12.0 with 0.5 N
NaOH.
3.2.8 Hydrochloric Acid (HCI), 2 N. Add
66 ml of concentrated HCI to a 500-ml
volumetric flask containing water, dilute to
volume, and mix well. Store in a glass-
stoppered bottle.
3.2.9 Sulfanilamide Solution. Add 20 g of
sulfanilamide (melting point 165 to 167 *C) to
700 ml of water. Add, with mixing. 50 ml
concentrated phosphoric acid (85 percent).
and dilute to 1000 ml. This solution is stable
for at least 1 month, if refrigerated.
3.2.10 N-(l-Naphthyl)-Ethylenediamine
Dihydrochloride (NEDA) Solution. Dissolve
0.5 g of NEDA in 500 ml of water. An aqueous
solution should have one absorption peak at
320 nm over the range of 260 to 400 nm.
NEDA, showing more than one absorption
peak over this range, is impure and should
not be used. This solution is stable for at
least 1 month if protected from light and
refrigerated.
3.2.11 Cadmium. Obtained from Matheson
Coleman and BelL 2909 Highland Avenue.
Norwood. Ohio 45212. as EM Laboratories
Catalogue No. 2001. Prepare by rinsing in 2 N .
HCI for 5 minutes until the color is silver-
grey. Then rinse the cadmium with water
until the rinsings are neutral when tested
with pH paper. CAUTION: Hi is liberated
during preparation. Prepare in an exhaust
hood away from any flame.
3.2.12 NaNOi Standard Solution. Nominal
Concentration, 100 n g NOr-/ml. Desiccate
NaNOi overnight. Accurately weigh 1.4 to 1.6
g of NaNOi (assay of 97 percent NaNOi or
greater), dissolve in water, and dilute to 1
liter. Calculate the exact NOi- concentration
from the following relationship:
purity, % 48.01
Mg NO^/ml-g of NaNO,X XIO'X —
Section No. 3.15.10
Date July 1, 1986
Page 6
This solution is stable for at least 6 months
under laboratory conditions.
3.2.13 KNCs Standard Solution. Dry KNOs
at 110 *C for 2 hours, and cool In • desiccator.
Accurately weigh 9. to 10 g of KNCb to within '
0.1 mg, dissolve in water, and dilute to l liter.
Calculate the exact NO,- concentration from
the following relationship:
NOr-/ml-8 of KNO.X10'
x • 101.10
This solution is stable for 2 months without
preservative under laboratory conditions.
3.2.14 Spiking Solution. Pipette 7 ml of the
KNOj standard into a 100-ml volumetric
flask, and dilute to volume.
3.2.15 Blank Solution. Dissolve 2.4 g of
KMn04 and 1.2 g of NaOH in 96 ml of water.
Alternatively, dilute 60 ml of KMnO4/NaOH
solution to 100 ml.
3.2.16 Quality Assurance Audit Samples.
Same as in Method 7, Section 34.9. When
requesting audit samples, specify that they be
In the appropriate concentration range for
Method 7C.
4. Procedure.
4.1 Sampling.
4.1.1 Preparation of Collection Train. Add
200 ml of KMnOJNaOH solution (3.1.2) to
each of three impingers, and assemble the
train as shown in Figure 7C-1. Adjust probe
heater to a temperature sufficient to prevent
water condensation.
4.1.Z Leak-Check Procedure. A leak-check
prior to the sampling run should be carried
out: a leak-check after the sampling run is
mandatory. Carry out the leak-check(s)
according to Method 6, Section 4.1.2.
4.1.3 Check of Rotameter Calibration
Accuracy (Optional). Disconnect the probe
from the first impinger. and connect the filter
(2.1.6). Start the pump, and adjust the
rotameter to read between 400 and 500 cc/
min. After the flow rate has stabilized, start
measuring the volume sampled, as recorded
by the dry gas meter (DCM), and the
sampling time. Collect enough volume to
measure accurately the flow rate, and
calculate the flow rate. This average flow
rate must be less than 500 cc/min for the
sample to be valid: therefore, it is
recommended that the flow rate be checked
as above prior to each test
4.1.4 Sample Collection. Record the initial
DCM reading and barometric pressure.
Determine the sampling point or points
according to the appropriate regulations, e.g.,
Section 60.46(c) of 40 CFR Part 60. Position
the tip of the probe at the sampling point.
connect the probe to the first impinger, and
start the pump. Adjust the sample flow to a
value between 400 and 500 cc/min.
CAUTION: HIGHER FLOW RATES WILL
PRODUCE LOW RESULTS. Once adjusted.
maintain a constant flow rate during the
entire sampling run. Sample for 60 minutes.
For relative accuracy (RA) testing of
continuous emission monitors, the minimum
sampling time is 1 hour, simpling 20 minutes
o
o
o
-------
at each traverse point. [Note.—When the SO,
concentration is greater than 1200 ppm, the
sampling time may have to be reduced to 30
minutes to eliminate plugging of the impinger
orifice with MnOi. For RA tests with SO,
greater than 1200 ppm, sample for 30 minutes
(10 minutes at each point)). Record the DCM
temperature, and check the flow rate at least
every S minutes. At the conclusion of each
run. turn off the pomp, restore probe from the
stack, and record the final readings. Divide
the sample volume by the sampling time to
determine the average (low rate. Conduct a
leak-check as in Section 4.1.2. If a leak is
found, void the test run. or uae procedures
acceptable to the Administrator to adjust the
sample volume for the leakage.
4.1.S COi Measurement. During sampling. <
measure the COt content of the slack gas
near the sampling point using Method 3. The '
single-point grab sampling procedure is
adequate, provided the measurements are
made at least three times—near the start.
midway, and before the end of a run and the
average CO, concentration is computed. The
Orsat or Fyrite analyzer may be used for this
analysis.
4-2 Sample Recovery. Disconnect the
impingers. Pour the contents of the impingers
into a 1-liter polyethylene bottle using a
funnel end a sin-ring rod (or other means) to
prevent ipillags. Complete the quantitative
transfer by rinsing the impingers and
connecting tubes with water until the rinsings
that are clear to light pink, and add the
rinsings to the bottle. Mix toe sample, and
mark the solution level. Seal and identify the
sample container.
4.3 Sample Preparation for Analysis.
Prepare a cadmium reduction column as
follows: Fill the burette (£2.12) with water.
Add freshly prepared cadmium slowly with
lapping until no further Milling occur*. The
height of the cadmium column should be 39
cm. When not in use. store the column under
rinse solution (3.2.7). (Note.—The column
should not contain any bands of cadmium
Tines. This may occur if regenerated column
is used and will greatly reduce the column
lifetime.)
Note the level of liquid in the sample
container, end determine whether any sample
was lost during shipment If a noticeable
amount of leakage has occurred, the volume
lost can be determined from the difference
between initial end final solution levels, and
this value can then be used to correct the
analytical result. Quantitatively transfer the ,
contents to a 1-liter volumetric flask, and
dilute to volume.
Take a 100-ml aliquot of the sample and
blank (unexposed KMnO./NaOH) solutions,
and transfer to 400-m! beakers containing
magnetic storing bars. Using e pH meter, add
concentrated H.SO. with stirring until a pH
of 0.7 is obtained. Allow the solutions to
stand for 15 mintnes. Cover the beakers with
watch glasses, and bring the temperature of
the solutions to 50 *C. Keep the temperature
below 60 *C Dissolve 4.6 g of oxalic add m a
minimum volume of water, approximately 50
ml, sit room temperature. Do not heat the
solution. Add this solution slowly, in
increments, until the KMnO. solution
Section No. 3.15.10
Date July 1, 1986
Page 7
becomes colorless. II the color is not
completely removed, prepare some more of
the above oxalic acid solution, and add until
a colorless solution it obtained. Add an
excess of oxalic acid by dissolving 1.6 f? cf
oxalic acid in 50 ml of water, and add 6 ml of
this solution to the colorieis solution. II
suspended matter is present, add
concentrated H»SO« until a dear solution is
obtained.
Allow the samples to cool to near room
temorrolure. being sure thtt »h* sampies «re
still dear. Adjust the pH to 11.7 to 12-0 with
10 N NsOH Quantitatively transfer the
mixture to • Buchner funnel containing CF/C
filter paper, and filter the precipitate. Filter
the mixture into a 500-m) tillering flask. Wash
the solid material four times with water.
When filtration is complete, wash the Teflon
tubing, quantitatively transfer the filtrate to a
500-ml volumetric flask, and dilute to volume.
The samples are now ready for cadmium
reduction. Pipette a SO-ml aliquot of the
sample into a ISO-mi beaker, and add e
magnetic stirring bar. Pipetie in 1.0 ml of 6.5
percent EDTA solution, and mix.
Determine the correct stopcock telling to
establish a flow rate of 7 to B ml/rein of
column rinse solution through the cadmium
reduction column. Use • 50-ml graduated
cylinder to collect and measure the solution
. volume. Alter the last of the nnse solution
has passed from the funnel into the burette.
but before air entrapment can occur, start
adding the sample, and collect it in a 250-m!
graduated cylinder. Complete the
quantitative transfer of the sample to the
column as the sample passes through the
column. After the last of'the sample has
passed from the funnel into the burette, start
adding GO ml of column rinse solution, and
collect the rinse solution until the solution
just disappears from the funnel.
Quantitatively transfer the sample to a200-ml
volumetric flask [250-ml may be required),
and dilute to volume. The samples are now
ready for NOr-4- analysis. (Note.— Both the
sample and blank should go through this
procedure. Additionally, two spiked samples
should be run with every group of samples
passed through the column. To do this.
prepare two additional 50-ml aliquots of the
sample suspected to have the highest NOj-
concentrstion, and add 1 ml of the spiking
solution to these aliquots. If the spike
recovery or column efficiency (see 6.2.1) is
below 85 percent, prepare a new column, and
repeat the cadmium reduction).
4.4 Sample Analysis. Pipette 10 ml of
sample into a culture tube. (Note.—Some test
tubes give a high blank NO?-value but
culture tubes do not.) Pipette in 10 ml of
sulfanilamide solution and 1.4 ml of KEDA
solution. Cover the culture tube with
parafilm. and mix the solution. Prepare a
blank in the same manner using the sample
from treatment of the unexpo*ed KMnCW
NaOH solution (3.1.2). Also, prepare a
calibration standnrd to check the slope of (he
calibration curve. After a 10-minute color
development interval, measure the
absorbance at 540 nm against water. Rend UK
NOr-/ml from the calibration curve. If the
-------
absoruance i« freater than that of the highest
calibration standard, pipette less than 10 ml
of (ample and enouph water to make the total
•ample volume 10 ml. and repeat the
analysis. Determine the No> concentration
using the calibration curve obtained in
Section 5.3.
4.5 Audit Analysis. This is the same as in
Method?. Section 4.4.
5. Calibration.
5.1 Dry Cat Metering System (DCM).
5.1.1 Initial Calibration. Same as in Method
6. Section 5.1.1. For detailed instructions on
carrying out this calibration, it is suggested
that Section 3.5.2 of Citation 4 in the
bibiography be consulted.
5.1.2 Post-Test Calibration Check. Same
as In Method 6, Section 5.1.2.
5.2 Thermometers for DCM and
Barometer. Same as in Method 6. Sections 5.2
•nd 5.4. respectively.
5.3 Calibration Curve for
Spectrophotomeicr. Dilute 5.0 ml of the
NaNOi standard solution to 200 ml with
water. This solution nominally contains 25 fig
NCWml. Use this solution to prepare
calibration standards to cover the range of
0.25 to 3.00 fig N0r-/ml. Prepare a minimum
of three standards each for the linear and
slightly nonlinear (described below) range of
the curve. Use pipettes for all additions.
Run standards and a water blank as
instructed in Section 4.4. Plot the net
absorbance vs fig NOr-/ml. Draw a smooth
curve through the points. The curve should be
linear up to an absorbance of approximately
1.2 with a slope of approximately 0.53
absorbance units/fig NOt-/ml. The curve
should pass through the origin. The curve is
slightly nonlinear from an absorbance of 1.2
to 1.6.
6. Calculations.
Carry out calculations, retaining at least
one extra decimal figure beyond that of the
acquired data. Round off figures after final
calculation.
6.1 Sample volume, dry basis, corrected to
standard conditions.
Section No. 3.15.10
Date July 1, 1986
Page 8
67 Total fig NO, Per Sample.
6.Z1 Efficiency of Cadmium Reduction
Column. Calculate this value es follows:
o
E.«
(* -
s x 1.0 x
269.6 (x!- y)
s
(Eq. 7C-2)
Where:
E—Column efficiency, unitless.
x—Analysis of spiked sample, fig NCWml.
y» Analysis of unspiked sample, fig NO?-/
ml.
200«»Final volume of sample and blank after
passing through the column, ml
s-Concentration of spiking solution, ftg
NO,/ml.
1.0—Volume of spiking solution added, ml.
' 4fi.01«tfig NO~/fimole.
62.01«»fig NOj-/fimole.
6.2.2 Total fig NO,.
(S-B) 500 1000 (2X101 (S-B)
m- X200X — X •=
E 50 100 E
"(Eq. 7C-3)
Where: ,
m«=Musi of NO,, as NOi. in sample, fig.
S-Analysis of sample, fig NOr-/ml.
B-Analysis of blank, fig NO^/ml.
500—Total volume of prepared sample, ml.
50-Aliquot of prepared sample processed
through cadmium column, ml
100 - Aliquot of KMnOi/NaOH solution, ml.
1000-Total volume of KMnOWNaOH
solution ml.
6.3 Sample Concentration.
-K.XY
L=I fEq. 70-1)
C-K,
m
Where:
V.i^-Dry gas volume measured by the dry
pas meter, corrected to standard
conditions, dscm.
Vm " Dry gas volume «s measured by the dry
gas meter, don.
Y — Dry gas meter calibration factor.
X— Correction f actor f or CO« collection.
100
Where:
^Concentration of NO, as NO:, dry basis.
mg/dscm.
" IOO«1ECOi(v/v)
Ptar-Barometric pressure, mm fig.
PM-Standard absolute pressure, 7CO mm Hg.
Tm » Avers?* dry jras meter absolnte
temperature, "K.
TMB Standard absolute temperature. 233 *K.
'I
6.4 Conversion Factors.
1.0 pptn NO -1.247 mg NO/m* at STP.
1.0 ppm NOj-1.912 mg NOi/m'at STP.
lft1-2.832X10-1m3.
7. Quality Control.
Quality control procedures are specified in
Sections 4.1.3 (flow rate accuracy); 4.3
(cadmium column efficiency): 4.4 (calibration
curve accuracy); and 4.S (audit analysis
accuracy).
8. Bibliovraphv. ,
1. Marge'son. ).H.. W.J. Mitchell. J.C. Suygs.
and M.R. Mldgett. Integrated Samplins and
Analysts Methods for Determining NO,
Emissions at Electric Utility Plants. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Research
Triangle Park. N.C. Journal of the Air
Pollution Control Association. J21210-1215.
1982.
O
O
-------
Section No. 3.15.10
Date April 16, 1986
Page 9
2. Memorandum and attachment from J.H.
Margeson. Source Branch. Quality Assurance
Division. Environmental Monitoring Systems
Laboratory, to The Record. EPA. March 30.
1983. N'H> Interference in Methods "C and 70.
3. Margeson. ).H, f.C. Suggs, and M.R.
Midgett Reduction of Nitrate to Nitrite with
Cadmium. Anal. Chem. 52:1955-5'. 1960.
4. Quality Assurance Handbook for Air
Pollution Measurement Systems. Volume
III—Stationary Source Specific Methods.
August 1977. U.S. Environmental Protection
Ajzency. Research Triangle Park. N.C
Publication No. EPA-600/4-77-027b. August
1977.
5. Margeson. J.H.. et al. An Integrated
Method for Determining NO, Emissions at
Nitric Acid Plants. Manuscript submitted to
Analytical Chemistry. April 1884.
-------
Section No. 3.15.11
Date April 16, 1986
Page 1
11.0 REFERENCES
12. Gjerde, D. T., J. S. Fritz, and G. Schmuckler. Anion
Chromatography with Low-Conductivity Eluents. Journal
of Chromatography. 186, 509, 1979.
o
1. Federal Register, Volume 49, No. 189, September 27,
1984. Method 7D - Determination of Nitrogen Oxide
Emissions From Stationary Sources, Alkaline-Perman-
ganate/Ion Chromatographic Method.
2. Margeson, J. H., J. E. Knoll, M. R. Midgett, , G. B.
Oldaker III, K. R. Loder, P. M. Grohse, and W. F.
Gutknecht. Integrated Method for Determining NO
Emissions at Nitric Acid Plants. Analytical Chemistryf
5j6, 2607, 1984.
3. Small, H. T., S. Stevens, and W. C. Bauman. Novel Ion
Exchange Chromatographic Method Using Conductimetric
Determination. Analytical Chemistry, 47, 11:801, 1975.
4. Johnson, E. L. and R. Stevenson. Basic Liquid
Chromatography. Varian Associates, Inc., 1978.
5. Yost, R. W., L. S. Ettre, and R. D. Conlon, Practical
Liquid Chromatography, An Introduction. Perkin-Elmer,
1980.
6. Smith, F. C., Jr., and R. C. Chang. The Practice of [)
Ion Chromatography. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New V_x
York, 1983.
7. Stevens, T. S. and M. A. Langhorst. Agglomerated
Pellicular Anion-Exchange Columns for Ion
Chromatography. Analytical Chemistry, 54, 6:950, 1982.
8. Stevens, T. S., G. L. Jewett, and R. A. Bredeweg.
Packed Hollow Fiber Suppressors for Ion Chroma-
tography. Analytical Chemistry, 54, 7:1206, 1982.
9. Mulik, J. D., and E. Sawicki. Ion Chromatography.
Environmental Science and Technology, 13, 7:804, 1979.
10. Sevens, T. S., J. C. Davis, and H. Small. Hollow'Fiber
Ion Exchange Suppressor for Ion Chromatography.
Analytical Chemistry, 53, 9:1488, 1981.
11. Stevens, T. S. Packed Fibers and New Columns Speed,
Simplify Ion Chromatography. Industrial Research and
Development, September 1983.
O
-------
12.0 DATA FORMS
Section No. 3.15.12
Date October 23, 1985
Page 1
Blank data forms are provided on the following pages for the
convenience of the Handbook user. Each blank form has the
customary descriptive title centered at the top of the page.
However, the section-page documentation in the top right-hand
corner of each page of other sections has been replaced with a
number in the lower right-hand corner that will enable the user
to identify and refer to a similar filled-in form in a text
section. For example, Form M7D-1.1 indicates that the form is
Figure 1.1 in Section 3.15.1 of the Method 7D section. Future
revisions of these forms, if any, can be documented by 1.2A,
1.2B, etc. Twelve of the blank forms listed below are included
in this section. Four are in the Method Highlights subsection as
shown by the MH following the form number.
Form
1.1
2.2
2.4A and 2.4B
2.5 (MH)
3.1 (MH)
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4 (MH)
5.1
5.3
5..4 (MH)
6.1A and 6.IB
8.1
Title
Procurement Log
Wet Test Meter Calibration Log
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Data Form (English
and Metric Units)
Pretest Sampling Checks
Pretest Preparations
Field Sampling Data Form for NO
Sample Label
Sample Recovery and Integrity Data
On-Site Measurements
Analytical Data Form for Analyses of
Calibration Standards
NO Laboratory Data Form for Analyses of
Field Samples
Posttest Operations
Nitrogen Oxide Calculation Form (English and
Metric Units)
Method 7D Checklist to be Used by Auditors
-------
Section No. 3.15.11
Date A
Page 2
Date April 16, 1986 S~*\
13. Margeson, J. H., W. J. Mitchell, J. C. Suggs, and M. R.
Midgett. Integrated Sampling and Analysis Methods for
Determining NO Emissions at Electric Utility Plants.
Journal of the sir Pollution Control Association, 32,
1210, 1982.
14. Eubanks, D. R., and J. R. Stillian. Care of Ion
Chromatography Columns. Liquid Chromatography, 2_,
2:74, 1984.
15. Hamil, Henry F., et. al. The Collaborative Study of
EPA Methods 5, 6, and 7 in Fossil Fuel Fired Steam
Generators. Final Report, EPA-650/4-74-013, May 1974.
16. Hamil, H. F., and R. E. Thomas. Collaborative Study of
Method for the Determination of Nitrogen Oxide
Emissions from Stationary Sources (Nitric Acid Plants).
EPA-650/4-074-028, May 1974.
17. Hamil, Henry F. Laboratory and Field Evaluations of
EPA Methods 2, 6, and 7. Final Report, EPA Contract
No. 68-02-0626, Southwest Research Institute, San
Antonio, Texas, October 1973.
o
o
-------
PROCUREMENT LOG
Purchase
order
number
Quality Aoauronoo Handbook M7D 1.1
-------
WET TEST METER CALIBRATION LOG
wet teat meter serial number
Date
Range of wet test meter flow rate
Volume of test flask Vs =
Satisfactory leak check?
Ambient temperature of equilibrate liquid in wet test meter and reservoir
Test
number
1
2
3
Manometer
reading, a
mm l^o
Final
volume (Vf),
L
Initial
volume (Vj) ,
L
Total
volume, (Vm)
L
Flask
volume (V ) ,
L
Percent
error, c
%
aMust be less than 10 mm (0.4 in.) H2O.
Calculations:
" vf -
c% error = 100 (Vm - VS)/VQ =
(+1%).
Signature of calibration person
o
o
Quality Assurance Handbook M7D-2.2
o
-------
DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION
FORM (ENGLISH UNITS)
Date
Calibrated by
Meter box number
Wet test meter number
Barometer pressure, P
ffl
in. Hg Dry gas meter temperature correction factor
Wet test
meter
pressure
drop
-------
Date
DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA FORM (METRIC UNITS)
Calibrated by Meter' box number ' Wet test meter number
Barometer pressure, P =
in. Hg Dry gas meter temperature correction factor
Wet test
meter
pressure
drop
(IV'a
mm H20
Rota-
meter
setting
(Rs),
cc/rain
Wet test
meter gas
volume
< V 'b
L
Dry test meter
gas volume
(Vd),b L
Initial
Final
Wet test
meter
gas temp
,
°C
Inlet
gas
temp
'V
°C
Dry test meter
Outlet
gas temp
o
°C
Average
gas temp
°C
Time
of run
(9),d
min
Average
ratio
i
D expressed as negative number.
Volume passing through meter. Dry gas volume is minimum for at least five revolutions of the meter.
c The average of td and td if using two thermometers; the actual reading if using one thermometer.
d i O . .
The time it takes to complete the calibration run.
6 With Y defined as the average ratio of volumes for the wet test and the dry test meters, Yi = Y +0.02 Y for
calibration and Y^^ = Y +0.05 Y for the posttest checks; thus,
Vw (td + 273°C) [Pm + (Dm/13.6)]
Vd (tw
273°C) (P)
m
(Eq. 1)
and
Y =
(Eq. 2)
With Y defined as the average ratio of volumetric measurement by wet test meter to rotameter.
Tolerance Yr = 1 +0.05 for calibration and Y +_0.1 for posttest checks.
Vw (td + 273°C)
(Dm/13.6)
(tw + 273°c>
(Eq . 3 )
and
o
(Eq. 4)
Quality Assurance Handbook M7D-2.4B
o
-------
Plant name
Location
Operator
FIELD SAMPLING DATA FORM FOR NO
City
Date
Sample no.
Probe length/material
Meter box no.
Sampling point location(s)
Rotameter setting
Initial leak check?
C00 concentration (1)
(2)
Probe setting
Meter factor (Y)
Bar press mm (in.) Hg
Rotameter check?
Final leak check?
(3)
avg
Sampling
time,
min
-
Total
Clock
time
2H h
Dry gas
meter
readings
L (ft3)
Total
Sample flow
rate setting,
cc/min (ft^/min)
Sample volume
metered,_(V )
L (ft3) m
•
V
m
avg
Percent
deviation,
%
Avg
dev
Dry gas
meter temp
°C (°F)
•
Avg
^Percent deviation =
V — V ave
m m B x 100 (must be less than 10 percent).
V avg
Quality Assurance Handbook M7D-4.1
-------
SAMPLE LABEL
o
Plant
Site " v '
Date
Front rinse
Back rinse L
Solution
Volume: Initd
Cleanup by
City
Sample type
Run number
J Front filter 1 J Front solution 1 1
Back filter | | Back solution 1 1
Level marked «
Lai Final %
E
0)
kt.
o
Quality Assurance Handbook M7D-4.2
O
-------
Plant
SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY DATA
Sampling location
Field Data Checks
Sample recovery personnel
Person with direct responsibility for recovered samples
Sample
number
1
2
3
Blank
Sample
identification
number
Date
of
recovery
Liquid
level
marked
Stored
in locked
container
Remarks
Signature of field sample trustee
Laboratory Data Checks
Lab person with direct responsibility for recovered samples
Date recovered samples received
Analyst
Sample
number
1
2
3
Blank
Sample
identification
number
Date
of
analysis
Liquid
level
marked
Stored
in locked
container
•
Remarks
Signature of lab sample trustee
Quality Assurance Handbook M7D-4.3
O'7-
7-
-------
ANALYTICAL DATA FORM FOR ANALYSES OF CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Plant
Date
Location
Analyst
o
Standard
identifier
Std 1
Std 2
Std 3
Std 4
Standard
concentration (x)
(pg/inl N03 )
Instrument response (y)
peak height or area count
nun
1
2
3
Avg
Predicted
standard
concentration (P)
(Vg/nl N03 )
Deviation
.(*)."
Equation for Linear Calibration Curve, Average Response as a Function of Standard
Concentration
y = mx + b = (
) x
where:
y = instrument response (mm or area count) =
m = calibration curve slope
mm or area count
yg NO ~/ml
O
x = standard concentration (yg NCL /nl) =
b = I = intercept term (mm or area count) =
Predicted Standard Concentration (P)
P ( C NO ~/ 1) - AveraSe Instrument Response (y) - Intercept (I)
^ Calibration Curve Slope (B)
P (for first standard)
V g NO ~/ml
Deviation
Deviation (%) .
fag
Deviation
(of first set ,
of standards) = -
- x (yg NO^/ml)
x (yg N03"/mL)
x 100*
Quality Assurance Handbook M7D-I
(/*"
-------
N0v LABORATORY DATA FORM FOR ANALYSES OF FIELD SAMPLES
X
Date samples received
Plant
Location
Calibration curve slope (m)
Date samples analyzed
Run number(s)
Analyst
Intercept term (I)
Field
sample
number
Field
Blank
Analysis
number
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
Instrument
response (y)
(mm or area counts)
Concentration of
analysis samgle
(ug/ml NO. )
Average
Concentration of
analysis samgle
( Vg/ml N0_ )
S =
S =
S =
B =
Deviation
(*)
Concentration of
Analysis Sample
(Vg N03"/ml)
Concentration
(of first sample)
Instrument Response (y) - Intercept (I)
Calibration Curve Slope (m)
Deviation
Deviation
(of first
standard set)
Sample Concentration - Average Concentration
S5 • ' -~ '- ' ' — X
Average Concentration
x 100* =
Quality Assurance Handbook M7D-5.3
-------
NITROGEN OXIDE CALCULATION FORM (ENGLISH UNITS)
Sample Volume
o
Vm =_
Pbar =
dcf, Y =
n. Hg, T
R
Vm(std) = 17-64
\bar =
m
dscf
Equation 6-1
Total yg N02 Per Sample
S = vg/ml, B = yg/ml
m = 3710 (S -B) =
of N0
Equation 6-2
Sample Concentration
C = 2.205 x 10
-9 m
x 10~5 Ib/dscf
O
V
m(std)
Equation 6-3
Sample Concentration in ppm
ppm NO2 = 8.375 x 10 C =
ppm
Equation 6-4
Quality Assurance Handbook M7D-6.1A
O
-------
vm = o.o
NITROGEN OXIDE CALCULATION FORM (METRIC UNITS)
Sample Volume
m3, Y =
bar ~
mm Hg, Tm =
K
Vm(std) = °-3858 x y
= 0.0 dscm Equation 6-1
m
Total vg N02 Per Sample
S = yg/ml, B =
m = 3710 (S - B) =
vg/ral
vg of N02
Equation 6-2
C = 10
-3 m
'm(std)
Sample Concentration
mg NO2/dscm
Equation 6-3
Sample Concentration in ppm
ppm N02 = 0.5228 C = ppm
NO,
Equation 6-4
Quality Assurance Handbook M7D-6.1B
-------
METHOD 7D CHECKLIST TO BE USED BY AUDITORS
o
Yes
No
Comment
OPERATION
PRESAMPLING PREPARATION
1. Knowledge of process conditions
2. Calibration of pertinent equipment, in particular,
the dry gas meter and rotameter, prior to each field
test
ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
3. Leak-testing of sampling train after sample run
4. Preparation of absorbing solution and its addition
to impingers
5. Constant sampling at less than 500 cc/min
6. Measurement of CO- content
7. Recording of pertinent process conditions during
sample collection
8. Maintaining the probe at a given temperature
O
POSTSAHPLINQ
9. Control sample analysis - accuracy and precision
10. Sample aliquotting techniques
11. Ion chromatographic technique
a. Preparation of standard nitrate samples
(pipetting)
b. Calibration factor (jf? % for all standards,
optional)
c. Adequate peak separation
12. Audit results (+10X)
a. Use of computer program
b. Independent check of calculations
COMMENTS
Quality Assurance Handbook M7D-J
-------
Section No. 3.16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 1
Section 3.16 '•
METHOD 18 — MEASUREMENT OF GASEOUS ORGANIC COMPOUND
EMISSIONS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
OUTLINE
Section
SUMMARY
METHOD HIGHLIGHTS
METHOD DESCRIPTION
1. PROCUREMENT OF APPARATUS
AND SUPPLIES
2. CALIBRATION OF APPARATUS
3. PRESAMPLING OPERATIONS
4. ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
5. POSTSAMPLING OPERATIONS
6. CALCULATIONS
7. MAINTENANCE
8. AUDITING PROCEDURE
9. RECOMMENDED STANDARDS FOR
ESTABLISHING TRACEABILITY.
10. REFERENCE METHODS
11. REFERENCES
12. DATA FORMS
Documentation
3.16
3.16
3-16.1
3-16.2
3.16.3
3.16.4
3-16.5
3-16.6
3-16.7
3.16.8
3.16.9
3.16.10
3-16.11
3.16.12
Number
of Pages
3
19
16 ,.-
15
44
/ 33 .=...
39
6
3
8
1
22
5
21
-------
Section No. 3.16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 2
To assist the Handbook user in applying Section 3-16 to particular sampling
and analytical techniques, the following table provides a quick cross reference to
o
each of the
approaches.
subsections dealing with each of the sampling and analytical
CROSS REFERENCES TO SUBSECTIONS RELATED TO SAMPLING APPROACHES
Activity
Procurementof equipment
Saopling
Analytical
Reagents
Calibration
Sanpllng equipment
Presanpling operations
Survey measurements
Survey preparations
Saople collection
Sample analysis
Interpretation of data
Preparation for test:
equipnent
reagents
Packing equipment
On-site Measurements
Sanpling
Postsampling Operations
Prepartion of calibration
standards
Audit sample analysis
Sample analysis
Calculations
Emission calculations
Auditing Procedures
Performance audits
System audits
All
Methods
l.lpl*
1.2p8
1-3P9
2.1pl
3-lpl
3-2pl
3-3P10
3.4pl3
3-4pl9
3.5p21
3.6P30
3-7P32
4.3P2
5-lpl
5-2p22
5-3P22
S.Opi
S.ipl
8.2p5
Flask
Sampling
1.1P3
1.2p8
1-3P9
2.1pl
3-lpl
3-2p8
3-3P11
3.*pl7
3-*pl9
3-5P28
3-6p30
3-7P32
N/A
5-lpl
N/A
N/A
6.1pl
N/A
N/A
Rigid
Container
Sampling
I.lp4
1.2p8
1-3P9
2.1pl
3.1pl
3-2 P9
3-3pl2
3.4pl8
3-4pl9
3-5P28
3-6p30
3-7P32
A.3p2
5-lpi
5-2p22
5-3P22
6.lpi
S.ipft
8.2P5
Direct
Bag
Sampling
l.lpA
1.2p8
1-3P9
2.1pl
3-lpl
3-2p9
3.3P12
3.4P18
3-4pl9
3-5P28
3.6p30
3.7P32
*.3P9
5-lpl
5-2p22
5.2P22
6.1P1
8.1P4
8.2p5
Direct
Interface
Sampling
I.lp6
1.2p8
1-3P9
2.1pl
3-lpl
H/A
»/A
H/A
3-*pl9
3-5P29
3.6P30
3-7P32
4-3P13
5-ipl
5-2p22
5.2P23
6.lpl
8.lp4
8.2p5
Dilution
Interface
Sampling
l.lp?
1.2p8
1-3P9
2.2p9
3-lpl
N/A
N/A
N/A
3-*Pl9
3-5P29
3-6P30
3-7P32
ft.3pl<
5-lpl
5-2P22
5-2p25
6.1pl
8. IPS
8.2p5
Adsorption
Tube
Saapling
1.1P3
1.2p8
1-3P9
2.1pl
3-lpl
3-2pio
3-3pl2
3-*pl9
3.*Pl9
3-5P28
3-6P30
3-7P32
4.3P17
5-lpl2
5-2p22
5-2p26
6.2p2
8-1P5
8.2P5
O
• "l.lpl" - Means that the procurement of the sampling equipment is dicussed in Section 3.16.1.1
beginning on page 1 of Section 3.16.1.
O
-------
Section No. 3.16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 3
SUMMARY
Method 18 is a generic method for measuring gaseous organic compounds. The
method is based on separating the major gaseous organic components of a gas mixture
with a gas chromatograph (GC) and measuring the separated components with a
suitable detector. The gas samples are analyzed immediately as taken from the
stack or within a set period of time after being collected in a Tedlar bag or on an
adsorption tube.
To identify and quantify,the major components, the retention times of each
separated component are compared' with those of tknown compounds under identical
conditions. Therefore,, the analyst must identify approximate concentrations of the
organic emission components beforehand. With this information, the analyst can
then prepare or purchase commercially available standard mixtures to calibrate the
GC under physical conditions identical to those that will be used for the samples.
The analyst must also have some presurvey information concerning interferences
arising from other compounds present and indicating the need for sample dilution to
avoid detector saturation, gas stream filtration to eliminate particulate matter,
and prevention of sample loss in moisture condensation in the sampling apparatus.
This method is structured to analyze approximately 90 percent of the total
gaseous organics emitted from an industrial source. It does not include techniques
to identify and measure trace amounts of organic compounds, such as those found in
building air and fugitive emission sources.
This method will not determine compounds that 1) are polymeric (high molecular
weight), 2) polymerize before analysis, or 3) have very low vapor pressures at
stack or instrument conditions.
The range of this method is from about 1 part per million (ppm)* to the upper
limit governed by GC detector saturation or column overloading. The upper limit
can be extended by diluting the stack gases with an inert gas or by using smaller
gas sampling loops. The sensitivity limit for a compound is defined as the minimum
detectable concentration of that compound, or the concentration that produces a
signal-to-noise ratio of three to one. The minimum detectable concentration and
limit of quantitation are determined during the presurvey calibration for each
compound. 12
The method descriptions given herein are based on the method * promulgated
October 8, 1983 • and on corrections and additions published on May 30, 1984
(Section 3-16.10). Revisions to the method were promulgated February 19t 198? and
these are also described. Blank forms for recording data are provided in the
Method Highlights and in Section 3-3.12 for the convenience of Handbook users.
*Note: Selective detectors may allow detection and quantitation of far smaller
concentrations of certain types of gaseous organic compounds.
-------
Section No. 3.16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 4
o
METHOD HIGHLIGHTS
Section 3-16 describes procedures and specifications for determining gaseous
organic compounds from stationary sources. A gas sample is extracted froa the
stack at a rate proportional to the stack velocity using one of four techniques:
(1) integrated bag sampling, (2) direct interface sampling, (3) dilution interface
sampling, and (4) adsorption tube sampling. For the first three techniques, the
sample or diluted sample is introduced directly into the sample loop of the gas
chromatograph (GC). The measured sample is then carried into the GC column with a
carrier gas where the organic compounds are separated. The organic compounds then
are each measured quantitatively by the GC detector. The qualitative analysis is
made by comparing the retention times (from injection to detection) of known
standards to the retention times of the sample compounds. Once sample cospounds
are identified, quantitative analysis is made by comparing the detector response
for the sample compound to a known quantity of corresponding standard. Gas samples
collected on adsorption tubes are desorbed from the adsorption media using a
solvent. A measured volume of the desorption solution is injected into a heated
injection port where the mixture vaporizes and is carried into the GC column with a
carrier gas. The sample is separated into the individual components, then
qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed in the same manner as a gas sample.
Because of the number of different combinations of sampling, sample prepar-
ation, calibration procedures, GC column materials and operating procedures, and GC
detectors covered under this method, a set of tables (appearing at the end of the
Method Highlights section) has been developed to assist the tester in selecting and
the test observer in approving an acceptable sampling and analytical technique.
The compounds listed in these tables were selected based on their current status as
either presently regulated or being evaluated for future regulations by EPA and
state and local agencies, "fable A lists selected organic compounds for Method 18
and provides the user with: (1) the Chemical Abstracts (CA) name, any synonyns, the
chemical formula, the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) number; (2) nethod
classification and corresponding references for morej.information; and (3) whether
EPA currently has an audit cylinder for this compound.
For a given compound, the sampling and analytical techniques described in
Tables B, C, D and E are classified in Table A (Status of Selected Organic
Compounds for Method 18 Sampling and Analysis Techniques) into one of five classes
as follows:
1. Reference (R). This is a method promulgated by EPA as the conpliance
test method for one or more EPA emission regulations.
2. Tentative (T). This is a method where EPA method developnent is
completed and documented, but the method has not been promulgated.
3. Development (D). This is a method currently under development by EPA.
4. Other (0). This is a method developed and documented by an organization
other than EPA.
5. None (N). This is a method that has not been developed or validated but
should work based on experience with similar situations.
Table B shows all the sampling techniques described in Method 18. For each
compound, each of the allowed sampling techniques is rated either: (1) recosaend-
ed, (2) acceptable, (3) theoretical, (4) not recommended, or (5) unknown. The
rating codes for sampling are based on the extent of method validation. A particu-
lar sampling technique is rated based on current EPA methodology. Where EPA neth-
odology does not exist, methodology provided by organizations other than the EPA is
used for rating. As an example on how to use Table B, the rating for benzene is
"T" for direct interface, "R-12" for Tedlar bags, and "A-9,13" with carbon disul-
o
-------
Section No. 3.16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 5
fide for adsorbent tubes. This .means that for sampling, there is no documented
experience with the direct interface method, but in theory it could be valid; a
Tedlar bag is recommended as a sampling technique and Reference 12 provides further
description; and charcoal tubes using carbon disulfide as the desorption liquid are
acceptable and References 9 and 13 provide further description.
Before a final sampling technique is selected, the source tester will need to
consider the general strengths and weaknesses of each technique in addition to the
guidance provided in Table B. The strengths and weaknesses for the sampling
techniques described in*Method 18 are as follows:
Direct Interface or Dilution Interface
Strengths:
1.
2.
Weaknesses;
1.
2.
3.
4.
Tedlar Bag
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
2.
3-
k.
1.
Adsorbent Tubes
Strengths: 1.
2.
3.
Can immediately determine if analysis is successful.
Samples collected are in a form that approximates the form in
stack emissions and minimizes the time for degradation through
polymerization, condensation, etc.
No loss or alteration in compounds due to sampling since a sample
collection media (bag or adsorbent) is not used.
Method of choice for steady state sources when duct temperature is
below 100°C and organic concentrations are suitable for the GC
detector.
GC must be located at the sampling site.
A GC equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) cannot be
operated at a sampling site if the presence of the H? flame will
be hazardous.
Cannot sample proportionally or obtain a time integrated sample.
Because results represent only instantaneous values, they are not
totally indicative of non-steady state processes.
Samples collected are in a form that approximates the form in
stack emissions.
Samples may be returned to the laboratory for GC analysis.
Multiple analyses, if necessary, may be performed on each
collected sample.
Samples can be collected proportionally.
Unless protected, Tedlar bags are awkward and bulky for shipping
back to the laboratory. Caution must be taken to prevent bag
leaks.
Stability of compound(s) of interest in Tedlar bags with time must
be known. (Maximum permissible storage time(s) must be known or
determined, and must not be exceeded.)
Polar compounds generally should not be collected due to bag
adsorption. There are some exceptions (i.e., ethylene oxide).
Samples may not be collected when the concentration of any
component present is within explosive limits.
Samples collected are compact and easy to return to the laboratory
for analysis.
Samples may be returned to the laboratory for GC analysis.
Sample storage time generally can be extended to a week by keeping
-------
Section No. 3«l6
Date June 30, 1988 ^^^
Page 6 i)
samples at 0°C. However, the migration of the collected com-
pound(s) through the charcoal to the backup portion may be a
problem.
Weaknesses: 1. Quantitative recovery percentage of each organic compound from the
adsorbent material must be known.
2. Breakthrough sample gas volume for organic compounds as present in
the source matrix must be known for the adsorbent material.
3. Any effect of moisture (in the stack gas) on the adsorbent
material collection capacity must be known. Moisture in the
sample above 2 to 3 percent may severely reduce the adsorptive
capacity.
4. Generally, samples can be collected conveniently only at a
constant rate.
5. Samples must be returned to the lab for analysis.
Table C lists the recommended GC detectors commonly used with Method 18. For
each compound, each GC detector is rated either: R - recommended, A - acceptable,
T - theoretical, N - not recommended, or U - unknown. A particular GC detector is
rated based on current EPA methodology. Where EPA methodology does not exist,
methodology provided by organizations other than the EPA is used for rating. As an
example on how to use Table C, the rating for benzene is "R-4,12" for a flame
ionization detector (FID), "N" for an electron capture detector (ECD), "T-38" for a
photoionization detector (PID), and "N" for an electrolytic conductivity detector
(ELCD). This means an FID is recommended as the GC detector and References 4 and
12 provide further description, an ECD and an ELCD are not recommended, and there ^-^
is no documented experience with a PID for benzene, but its use is theoretically f )
possible based on the ionization potential found in Reference 38. V '
Table D presents information on packed columns suitable for GC analysis of the
selected compounds. Items covered include column type and conditions, Kovats
Retention Indices (KRI's), if available, and associated literature references. The
recommended column appears first, the others are acceptable. Specifically, any
column or condition that meets the Method 18 criteria for peak resolution is
considered acceptable. A particular GC column is recommended based on current EPA
methodology; where EPA methodology does not exist, methodology provided by
organizations other than the EPA is used for rating. Kovats Retention Indices were
previously used to identify unknown compounds by comparison of the measured KRI(s)
for a compound to catalogued KRI's for the various columns. In performing Method
18, KRI's can be useful in selecting a GC column which will effectively separate
two (or more) target compounds and/or interferents in an air sample. In Table D,
the first number shown for each compound refers to the literature reference for the
column and column conditions suggested for the recommended sampling method (when
available); the letter(s) associated with this number cross-references the List of
Referenced Columns following Table D. Listed next for each compound are the
columns and conditions suggested for sampling methods with an acceptable rating;
additional references are provided for columns used for analysis of the selected
compounds under laboratory conditions. Supplementary references provide KRI's (in
parentheses) for certain compounds. As an example of how to use Table D, the entry
for benzene is "12-s, t; 9-k; 13-u; 4-p; 39-d(658), e(557), i(1039), h(1104),
v(963)." This means that the column described in citations s and t in the Table D
List of Referenced Columns was specified in the method described in Reference 12;
the column described in citation k in the List of Referenced Columns was specified
in the method described in Reference 9; the column described in citation u in the
List was specified in the method described in Reference 13; the column described in
citation p in the List was specified in the method described in Reference 4; and
O
-------
Section No. 3.16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 7
the columns described in citations d, e, i, h, and v in the List were specified in
the method described in Reference 39- The KRI's for each column under the
conditions given in the List are shown in parentheses.
The user should be aware that interfering compounds may exist in source
samples. Some method development work, using the required presurvey sample, may be
necessary to optimize separation of the compounds of interest from the interfering
compounds present in a source sample. As discussed later in Section 3-16.5. any
column that will provide an acceptable resolution of the compounds can be used.
Only packed columns are described in Table D since these are more commonly
available to source test analysts than capillary columns. However, capillary
columns are permitted in Method 18 for analysis.
Table E shows the GC calibration preference for each compound based on the
technique used for sampling. Where appropriate, the source of calibration
standards is also shown. For each-compound, the calibration technique shown is
rated either: (1) recommended, (2) acceptable, (3) theoretical, (4) not
recommended, or (5) unknown. A particular calibration technique is rated based on
current EPA methodology. Where EPA methodology does not exist, methodology
provided by organizations other than the EPA is used for rating. As an example on
how to use Table E, the rating for benzene is "R-12 (1806)" for gas cylinders, "N"
for gas injection into a Tedlar bag, "A-12" for liquid injection into a Tedlar bag,
"R-9,13" for preparation of the standard in desorption liquid, and "T" for
preparation of the standard on an adsorption tube followed by desorption. This
means that gas cylinders assayed and certified against National Bureau of Standards
(NBS) gaseous Standard Reference Material (SRM) 1806 using EPA Traceability
Protocol No. 1 (Reference 5) are recommended as the calibration standard for direct
interface and Tedlar bag samples with Reference 12 providing further information on
the source of the calibration standard; preparation of calibration standards by gas
injection into a Tedlar bag is not recommended; preparation of calibration
standards by liquid injection into a Tedlar bag is acceptable and Reference 12
provides further information; preparation of calibration standards in the
desorption liquid is the recommended procedure for use with the adsorption tube
methods described in References 9 and 13; and preparation of calibration standards
on adsorption tubes followed by desorption is theoretically valid for use with
adsorption tube samples.
Because the number of organic compounds of interest to EPA and state and local
agencies is increasing, and since EPA plans to conduct methods development and
validation studies for many of the organic compounds identified here as well as for
additional compounds identified in the future, the Method Highlights portion of
Section 3-16 will be updated every two or three years. As with all other revisions
of Volume III of the Quality Assurance Handbook, those individuals whose names are
in the Record Distribution System will automatically receive the updated Method
Highlights section.
For compounds not currently listed in the tables, Figure 0.1 may be used as a
general guide in selecting appropriate sampling techniques. However, any technique
used must meet the criteria described in detail in the subsequent sections.
The Method Description (Sections 3.16.1 to 3.16.9) is based on the detailed
specifications in the Reference Method (Section 3-16.10) promulgated by EPA on
October 18, 1983 and corrections and revisions promulgated February 19, 1987. '
1. Procurement of Apparatus and Supplies
Section 3-16.1 gives specifications, criteria, and design features for the
-------
CONCENTRATION
>1PPMV
CHARACTERIZE
STATIONARY
SOURCE
ORGANIC
COMPOUND
EMISSIONS
LOW TEMPERATURE
LOW MOISTURE (< 1%)
v
CONCENTRATION
<, 1PPMV
MEDIUM TEMPERATURE
MEDIUM MOISTURE (> 3%)
HIGH TEMPERATURE
HIGH MOISTURE (> 10%)
SEMIVOLATILE
MM5
VOLATILE
VOST
NONPOLAR
POLAR
NONPOLAR
POLAR
HIGH CONCENTRATION
TEDLAR BAG
ADSORPTION TUBE
DIRECT INTERFACE
DILUTION INTERFACE
ADSORPTION TUBE
DIRECT INTERFACE
DILUTION INTERFACE
HEATED TEDLAR BAG
ADSORPTION TUBE
DIRECT INTERFACE
DILUTION INTERFACE
ADSORPTION TUBE (SILICA)
DIRECT INTERFACE
DILUTION INTERFACE
DILUTION INTERFACE
LOW CONCENTRATION
DIRECT INTERFACE
Figure 0.1. General scheme for selection of appropriate sampling techniques.
"0 O W
C3 P Q
OT ft O
(0 (B ct
LO •
O
• LO
CO
OO
O\
O
O
O
-------
Section No. 3.16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 9
required equipment and materials. The sampling apparatus for Method 18 is divided
according to the different sampling approaches. This section can be used as a
guide for procurement and initial checks of equipment and supplies. The activity
matrix (Table 1.1) at the end of the section is a summary of the details given in
the text and can be used as a quick reference.
2. Presampling Preparations
Section 3-16.2 describes the required calibration procedures for the Method 18
sampling equipment. Section 3-16.3 describes the presampling operations and the
acquisition of supplies and equipment needed for -the sampling. Preliminary survey
sampling is discussed, including a description of classes of organic compounds and
the presurvey sampling techniques that are generally used to obtain a sample for
evaluation purposes. The presurvey sampling and analytical methods are then
described. Finally, how to select the proper sampling and analytical equipment
based on the presurvey data is discussed. The preliminary survey and presanpling
preparation forms (Figures 3-2 and 3-5 of Section 3.16.3) can be used as equipment
checklists. Suggestions for packing the equipment and supplies for shipping are
given to help minimize breakage and reduce contamination.
Activity matrices for the calibration of equipment and the presampling
operations (Tables 2.1 and 3-1) summarize the activities detailed in the text.
3. On-Site Measurements
Section 3-16.4 describes several sampling techniques. The use of the presur-
vey sample analyses and the sampling matrix tables (Tables A through E) provides
the user with the required information to select the proper sampling technique. A
checklist (Figure 4.8) is an easy reference for field personnel to use in all
sampling activities. Sampling and analyses using the direct interface and the
dilution interface methods are both conducted on-site; however, to provide for
greater consistency of presentation, the analytical procedures are presented in the
Posttest Operations Section with those for the other sampling techniques.
4. Posttest Operations
Section 3-16.5 describes the analytical procedures and the posttest activities
for checking the equipment. The initial analytical procedure of sample preparation
is shown based on the sampling technique used and includes the procedures for
preparation of the calibration standards. The second procedure discussed is the
method of introducing a known volune of sample into the GC and this is followed by
a discussion of GC operations. The detailed analytical procedures can be removed
for use as an easy reference in the laboratory. An activity matrix (Table 5.1)
summarizes the postsampling operations.
Section 3-16-6 describes calculations, nomenclature, and significant digits
for the data reduction. A programmed calculator is recommended to reduce
calculation errors.
Section 3-16-7 recommends routine and preventive maintenance programs. The
programs are not required, but their use should reduce equipment downtime.
5- Auditing Procedures
Section 3-16.8 describes performance and system audits. Performance audits
for both the analytical phase and the data processing are described. A checklist
-------
Section No. 3-16 ^-s.
Date June 30, 1988 ( )
Page 10 V_y
(Figure 8.2) outlines a system audit.
Section 3.16.9 lists the primary standards to which the working standards or
calibration standards should be traceable.
6. References
Section 3-16.10 contains the promulgated Method; Section 3-16.11 contains the
references used throughout this text; and Section 3-16.12 lists all the data forms
in Section 3-16 and contains copies of blank data forms for those shown completed
in the text. These may be removed from the Handbook, copied, and used in
performing the method. Each form has a subtitle [e.g., M18-2.5 (Figure 2.5)] to
assist the user in locating the same completed form in the text. Several
checklists are not completed in the text and and therefore not reproduced in this
section.
O
o
-------
Section No. 3.16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 11
TABLE A. STATUS OF SELECTED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS FOR METHOD 18 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
Chemical Abstracts Name
Synonyms
Formula
CAS No.
Method
Class
EPA Audit
Cylinder(ppm)'
Alcohols
Methanol
Ethanol
Isopropyl Alcohol
n-Propyl Alcohol
n-Butyl Alcohol
Methyl Alcohol
Ethyl Alcohol
2-Propanol
1-Propanol
1-Butanol
CH.O
C-fl,0
C3H8°
w
C4H10°
(67-56-D
(64-17-5)
(67-63-0)
(71-23-8)
(71-36-3)
0-6
0-7
0-7
0-8
0-8 ;
30-80
No
No
No
No
Alkanes
Cyclohexane
Hexane
Ethylene
Propylene
1,3-Butadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
1 C6H12
1 C$Hl4
Alkenes
Ethene I CjIK
Propene ] C.H/.
Dienes
Butadiene j C^H,
Perchlorocyclopentadlene 1 C -Cl,
| (110-82-7)
| (110-54-3)
j (74-85-1)
1 (115-07-1)
| (106-99-0)
| (77-47-4)
0-9
0-9
:
D-10
0-11
| 80-200
J20-90.1000-3000
1 5-20,300-700
I 5-20,300-700
| 5-60
j No
Aromatic
Benzene
Mesitylene
Ethylbenzene
Cumene
Xylene (m-,o-,p-)
Toluene
Styrene
2-Naphthylamine
Benzol
1 , 3,5-Trimethylbenzene
1-Methylethylbenzene
Dimethylbenzene
Methylbenzene
Ethenylbenzene
2-Naphthylenanine
C6H6
C9«12
r'u
V'R™1 n
P H
Q 12
C'u
81O
r* ^»« *"
C7H8
p'u
88
«SoV
(71-43-2)
(108-67-8)
(100-41-4)
(98-82-8)
(1330-20-7)
(108-88-3)
(100-42-5)
(91-59-8)
T-12
N
0-13
0-13
0-13
0-9.13
0-13
O-14
5-20,6o-4oo
NO
No
No
5-20,300-700
5-20,100-700
No
No
Ketones
Acetone
Methyl
Methyl
Ethyl Ketone
Isobutyl Ketone
2-Propanone
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
C H60
C4H8°
(67-64-1)
(78-93-3)
(108-10-1)
0-15
0-16
0-15
No
30-80
5-20
Epoxides
Ethylene Oxide
Propylene Oxide
Epoxy Ethane
1,2-Epoxy Propane
C2H4°
| (75-21-8) | 0-17 | 5-20
I (75-56-9) 1 0-18 I 5-20,75-200
Sulfides
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Sulfide
Mustard Gas
(505-60-2)
No
-------
Section No. 3-16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 12
o
TABLE A. (Continued)
Chemical Abstracts Name
1 1
Synonyms | Formula | CAS No.
Method
Class
EPA Audit
Cylinder(ppm)*
Halogenated
Ethylidene Chloride
Ethylene Dibromlde
Ethylene Dichloride
Propylene Dichloride
1,1,1-Trichloro ethane
Bromodichlorome thane
Chlorodibromome thane
Chloroform
Carbon Tetrachloride
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Methyl Bromide
Methyl Chloride
Methylene Chloride
Tetrachloroethylene
Bromoform
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorotrifluoroethane
Vinylidene Chloride
Ethyl Chloride
Chlorobenzene
Vinyl Chloride
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1 ,1-Dichloroe thane
1 , 2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Methyl chloroform
Trichlorome thane
Tetrachlorom ethane
Preon 12
Bromomethane
Chi orome thane
Dichlorom ethane
Perchloroethylene
Tribromome thane
Trichloroethene
Freon 113
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroethane
Mono Chlorobenzene
Chloroe thylene
DBCP
C2H4C12
C2H4Br2
C2H4C12
CKC12
C^H.Cl
cfifirci
CHBr CI
CHC1
CCl,
CC1 F
CH fir
CH^Cl
CH,C1
C Cl
CHBr
C_HCf
C*C1 J
C2H2 2
C H Cl
cf H Cl
C2H1C1
C_H_Br_Cl
(5-34-3)
(106-93-4)
(107-06-2)
(78-87-5)
(71-55-6)
(75-27-4)
(124-48-1)
(67-66-3)
(56-23-5)
(75-71-8)
(74-83-9)
(74-87-3)
(75-09-2)
(127-18-4)
(75-25-2)
(79-01-6)
(76-13-D
(75-35-4)
(75-00-3)
(108-90-7)
(75-01-4)
(96-12-8)
0-19
0-20
T-21
0-22
T-21
N
N
T-23
T-23
0-24
0-25
O-26
T-2?
T-21
0-19
T-21
T-21
0-28
O-29
0-19
R-30
0-37
No
5-20,50-300
5-20,100-600
3-20,300-700
5-20
No
No
5-20,300-700
5-20
No
No
No
1-20
5-20.300-700
No
5-20,100-600
5-20
5-20,100-600
No
5-20
5-30
No
Method Classification Code
R " Reference - EPA promulgated method.
T • Tentative - EPA method development complete; EPA reference available.
D * Development - EPA method currently under development.
0 * Other - Method development completed by organizations other than EPA; reference available.
N « None - No reference available; recommendation baaed on experience.
The codes in the method classification column describe the current status of a sampling and analysis
method for each selected compound. For example, the method classification code for benzene is: T-12.
This means the current method for benzene is a tenative EPA method with development complete and the
reference for the method is citation number 12 in Section 3.16.11.
* The availability of EPA audit cylinders is shown in this column where:
( ) * Audit cylinders for this particular compound are available from EPA in the concentration ranges
indicated (Reference 4).
No •= Audit cylinders for this particular compound are not available from EPA. The source tester must
obtain audit gas cylinders from commercial gas vendors certified by Independent analysis to be
within 5 percent of the concentration claimed by the vendor.
O
o
-------
Section No. 3.16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 13
TABLE B. METHOD 18 SAMPLING TECHNIQUES FOR SELECTED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Selected Compounds
Interface Bag*
1 Adsorbent Tubes
Charcoal* | Other ••
and Desorption Liquid
| Desorption Liquid**"
Alcohols
Methanol
Ethanol
Isopropyl Alcohol
n-Propyl Alcohol
n-Butyl Alcohol
T
T
T
T
T
N
N
N
N
N
N
T-7
T-7
T-8
T-8
A-6; Silica Gel
-
-
-
-
Distilled Water
1% 2-Butanol in CS
IX 2-Butanol in CS^
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Disulfide
Alkanes
Cyclohexane
Hexane
Ethylene
Propylene
1,3-Butadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
T | U 1 T-9 | - |
T j U j T-9 j - j
Alkenes
T N | U | U |
T U j U* | U |
Dienes
T A-10 1 A-Al | U j
T U I N j A-ll; Porapak |
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Disulfide
U
U
Carbon Disulfide
Hexane
Aromatic
Benzene
Mesitylene
Ethylbenzene
Cuciene
Xylene (m-,o-,p-)
Toluene
Styrene
2-Napthylamine
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
R-12
U
U
u
u
u
u
u
T-9. 13
u
T-13
T-13
T-13
T-9, 13
T-13
T-lA
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
Carbon Disulfide
U
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Disulfide
Ketones
Acetone
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
T
T
T
N
N
N
T-15
N
T-15
A-16; Ambersorb
Carbon
Carbon
Carbon
Disulfide
Disulfide
Disulfide
Epoxides
Ethylene Oxide
Propylene Oxide
T
T
A
U
T-l?
T-18
99:1 Benzene:CS.
Carbon Disulfide
Sulfldes
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Sulfide
T
U
U
U
U
(continued)
-------
Section No. 3.16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 14
o
TABLE B. (Continued)
Selected Compounds
Interface
Bag*
Adsorbent Tube*
Charcoal* | Other ••
and Desorptlon Liquid
| De»orptlon Liquid"**
Halogenated
Ethylidene Chloride
Ethylene Dibromlde
Ethylene Bichloride
Propylene Diehlorlde
1 , 1,1-Triehloroe thane
B ronodich lor ooe thane
Chlorodibromooe thane
Chloroform
Carbon Tetrachloride
Dlchlorodif luorome thane
Methyl Bromide
Methyl Chloride
Methylene Chloride
Tetraehloroethylene
Bromoforn
Trlchloroethylene
Trichlorotr if luoroe thane
Vlnylidene Chloride
Ethyl Chloride
Chlorobenzene
Vinyl Chloride
1 , 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
U
N-31
• R-21
U
R-21
U
U
R-23
R-23
U
U
U
R-27
R-21
U
R-21
R-21
U
U
U
R-30
U
T-19
T-20
T-19
T-22
T-19
U
U
T-19
T-19
T-24
T-25
T-26
T-32
T-33
T-19
T-3«
T-35
T-28
T-29
T-19
T-36
T-37
„
-
-
-
-
-
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Carbon Dltulflde
99U BenzenetMeOH
Carbon Dlsulflde
15X Acetone in Cyclohexane
Carbon Dlsulflde
U
U
Carbon Dlculfide
Carbon Diaulfide
Methylene Chloride
Carbon Disulfide
Methanol
Carbon Diaulfide
Carbon Diaulfide
Carbon Diaulfide
Carbon Diaulfide
Carbon Dlsulflde
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Diaulfide
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Diiulfide
Rating Code
R • Recommended.
A * Acceptable.
T • Theoretical.
O
Based on actual source tests experience (sampling and analysis) this method is
valid and Is the method of choice among Method 18 users.
Based on actual source tests or similar source test experience (sampling and
analysis), this method is valid. The tester must evaluate for specific test.
Method haa no documented experience, but in theory could be valid.
N « Not Recommended. Based on actual source tests or similar source test experience and/or theory, this
method is invalid.
U » Unknown.
Method has no documented experience and the theoretical aspects of sampling by this
method are inconclusive. The tester must demonstrate that this sampling method is
valid.
The rating codes for sampling are based on the extent of method validation. For example, the rating
code for benzene is: T; R-12; A-9,13. This means that direct interface is theoretically possible for
benzene, but no documented experience has been found; Tedlar bags are the recommended sampling method for
benzene by the tenatlve EPA method referenced in citation 12 in Section 3.16.11; and sampling with
charcoal adsorption tubes is acceptable following the two methods referenced in citations 9 and 13 in
Section 3.16.11.
* » If condensibles exist, use the procedure described in Section 3.16.A.
•• = Solid sorbents other than charcoal recommended.
The recommended desorption solution is given In thia column.
priate reference for details.
Analyst should consult the appro-
O
-------
Section No. 3.16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 15
TABLE C. GC DETECTORS FOR SELECTED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY METHOD 18
Selected Compounds
Gas Chrornatograph Detector *
FID
ECD
FID
ELCD
Alcohols
Methanol
Ethanol
Isopropyl Alcohol
n-Propyl Alcohol
n-Butyl Alcohol
R-A.6
R-7
R-7
R-8
R-8
N
N
N
N
N
T-38
T-38
T-38
T-38
T-38
N
N
N
N
N
Alkanes
Cyclohexane
Hexane
R-A.9
R-A.9
N
N
T-38
T-38
N
N
Alkenes
Ethylene
Propylene
A-A
A-A
N
N
T-38
T-38
N
N
Dlenes
1,3-Butadlene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
R-A.10.Al
R-ll
N
T
T-38
u
N
T
Aromatic
Benzene
Mesltylene
Ethylbenzene
Cuoene
Xylene (o-,m-,p-)
Toluene
Styrene
2-Napthylamine
R-A.12
T
R-13
R-13
R-A.13
R-A.9.13
R-13
R-lA
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
T-38
T-38
T-38
T-38
T-38
T-38
T-38
U
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Ketones
Acetone
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
R-15
R-A.16
R-A.15
N
N
N
T-38
T-38
T-38
N
N
N
Epoxides
Ethylene Oxide
Propylene Oxide
R-A,
R-A,
17
18
N
N
T-38
T-38
N
N
Sulfides
bls(2-Chloroethyl) Sultide
U
U
U
U
(continued)
-------
Section No. 3.16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 16
o
TABLE C. (Continued)
1
1 ....
Selected Compounds | FID
Halogenated
Gas Chromatograph Detector •
| ECD | PID |
ELCD
Ethylidene Chloride
Ethylene Dlbromlde
Ethylene Dlchlorlde
Propylene Dlchlorlde
1,1,1-Trlchloroethane
Bromodlchl or one thane
Chlorodlbromomethane
Chloroform
Carbon Tetrachlorlde
Dichlorodif luorome thane
Methyl Bromide
Methyl Chloride
Methylene Chloride
Tetrachloroethylene
Bromoform
Trlchloroethylene
Trlchlorotrlfluoroethane
Vlnylldene Chloride
Ethyl Chloride
Chlorobenzene
Vinyl Chloride
1 , 2-Dlbromo-3-chloropropane
R-19
A-4
R-4.21
A-4
R-4.21
U
U
R-4.23
R-4,23
R-24
R-25
R-26
R-4,27.32
R-4,21
R-19
R-4,21
R-4.21
R-4.28
R-29
R-4,19
R-4,30
U
T
R-20
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
R-37
U
U
T-38
T-38
U
U
U
T-38
T-38
N-38
T-38
T-38
T-38.
T-38
T-38
T-38
N-38
T-38
T-38
T-38
T-38
u
T
T
T
R-22
T
T
T
A-23
A-23
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
Rating Code
R * Recommended.
A • Acceptable.
T «= Theoretical.
Not Recommended.
Unknown.
Based on actual source tests experience (sampling and analysis)
this method is valid an is the method of choice among Method 18
users.
Based on actual source tests or similar source test experience
(sampling and analysis), this method is valid. The tester must
evaluate for specific test.
Method has no documented experience, but in theory could be
valid.
Based on actual source tests or similar source test experience
and/or theory, this method is Invalid.
Method has no documented experience and the heoretical aspects
are not conclusive. The tester must demonstrate that this
detection method is valid.
The rating codes for GC detectors are based on the detector specified in the method
that is referenced. For example, the rating code for benzene is: R-4,12; N; T-38; N.
This means that the FID is recommended for detection of benzene by both references 4 and
12 cited in Section 3-16.11; the ECD and the ELCD are not recommended for benzene; and
detection of benzene with a PID is theoretically possible based on the ionization
potential found in reference 38.
• The following abreviations are used for the gas chromatography detectors:
FID = Flame Ionization Detector
ELCD • Electroconductivity Detector
(Hall Detector)
ECD « Electron Capture Detector
PID » Photoionization Detector
(with lamps up to 11.7 electron
volta)
O
o
-------
Section No. 3.16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 1?
TABLE D. PACKED COLUMNS SUITABLE FOR ANALYSIS OF SELECTED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
Selected Compounds | Column Reference, Type and Conditions, and Kovats Retention Indices*
ISBBBBBBBBKBBBBBB&XBSBSSBBBBBBBBBBZSZBBBHBBBBBBBSBBEXBBSBBBMBBBBSBSBBSBSBBBEBBXXBBXBSS —SSSEK —B = SSCBB:SS== = =:
Alcohols
Methanol 6-a; A-b, c; 39-d(370), e(33D. f(426)
Ethanol 7-g ,-
I«opropyl Alcohol 7-g; 39-d(A77), e(39°), f(576). hdoA?). i(loA6)
n-Propyl Alcohol 8-J; 39-e<387>. f(533)
n-Butyl Alcohol 8-j ; 39-d(6A9)
Alkanes
Cyclohexane | 9-k; 4-1; 39-d(66?), e(511), f(6l9)
Hexane | 9-k; A-n; 39-d(6oO). e(600), f(600)
Alkenea
Ethylene I 4-n ._
Propylene j 4-n '
Diene*
1,3-Butadlene | lO-o; 4-p, q, 4l-nnn
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene | 11-r
Aromatic
Benzene 12-s. t: 9-k; 13-u; 4-p; 39-1(658), e(557). i<1039). h(1104>, v(9&3)
Mesitylene
Ethylbenzene 13-u; 4-d(869), e(573). i(128l)
Cumene 13-u; A-i(13l8)
Xylene (o-.m-.p-) 13-w; A-x; 39-d(m * 876, p * 877. o * 900), i(m * 1297. p B 1312. o « 1353)
Toluene 9-k; 13-w; A-p; 39-d(?6l), h(1136), i(1201). v(!060)
Styrene 13-w; 39-i(lAl9)
2-Napthylamine lA-y
BZBBBBaBBBBBBBKKBBBBKBX«XBBBBBBttSB = B = = &«S9IKSSBBBXBB«KBSBBBaBBBBBBBBBKIIBBBXBBZBBBIBBBBBte = BBSSSBBBSSSSBSS = SS
Ketones
Acetone | 15-z; A-e(380), f(636). h(1009). h(1091)
Methyl Ethyl Ketone j 16-aa; A-bb; 39-d(579). e(A76), f(6AA), h(1087), 1(1158), v(927)
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone | 15-z; A-cc; 39-
-------
Section No. 3.16
Date June 30, 19&
Page 18
o
TABLE D. (Continued)
Selected Compounds
| Column Reference, Type and Conditions, and Kovats Retention Indices*
Halogenated
Ethylidene Chloride
Ethylene Dlbronlde
Ethylene Dlchloride
Propylene Dlchloride
1,1,1-Trichloroe thane
Bromodichloronethane
Chiorodibromoraethane
Chloroforn
Carbon Tetrachlorlde
Dichlorodlfluoromethane
Methyl Bromide
Methyl Chloride
Methylene Chloride
Tetrachloroethylene
Bromoform
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorotrifluoroethane
Vinylidene Chloride
Ethyl Chloride
Chlorobenzene
Vinyl Chloride
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
20-hh
21-11
22-kk
21-11
23-11
23-11
24-pp
25-qq
26-rr
27-«s.
21-11;
19-ww
21-11;
21-11;
28-zz;
29-11
19-bbb
30-ccc
37-ggg
39-- e(574), f<736). h(10$6), 1(1105). v(1039)
34-xx; 4-1; 39-d(695), e(546), f(665), h(1009), i(1068), v(1004)
35-yy; 4-oo
4-JJJ; 39-h(760), i(792), v(738)
4-kkk; 39-d(842). h(1347)
ddd; 36-eee; 4-fff
O
The GC column references, column types and conditions, and Kovats Retention Indices (if available) are
shown in this column. The first reference shown for each compound is for the column and conditions
suggested for the recommended sampling method (when available), followed by the column and conditions
suggested for sampling methods with an acceptable rating. Additional references are given when
available for columns used for analysis of the selected compound under laboratory conditions. Some
additional references provide Kovats Retention Indices for selected compounds. For example, the
reference code for benzene is: 12-s, t; 9-k; 13-ui 4-p; 39-d(658). e(557), 1(1039), h(1104), v(9&3).
This means that for benzene the columns described in citations s and t in the List of Referenced
Columns (following Table 0) were specified in the method described In citation 12 in Section 3.16.11;
the column described in citation k in the List of Referenced Columns was specified in the method
described in citation 9 in Section 3-l6.ll; the column described in citation u was specified in the
method descibed In citation 13 in Section 3.16.11; the column described in citation p was specified in
the method described in citation 4 in Section 3.16.11; and the columns described in citations d, e, 1,
h.and v were specified in the method described in citation 39 in Section 3.16.11. Where available, the
Kovats Retention Indices for each of the columns under the conditions given in their respective
references are given in parentheses-
Note: Any column or conditions that meet the Method 18 criteria for peak resolution are considered
acceptable.
O
-------
Section No. 3.16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 19
APPENDIX I to TABLE D.
LIST OF REFERENCED COLUMNS WITH SUGGESTED OPERATING CONDITIONS
60/80 mesh Tenax, operated isothermally at 80°C.
Chromasorb 101, operated isothermally at 50 C.
SP-2100 on Carbopack C, operated isothermally at
(a).
(b).
(c). 0.2% Carbowax 1500/0.:
60°C.
(d). 20% SP-2100/0.1% Carbowax 1500 on 100/200 mesh Supelcoport, operated
isothermally at 70°C.
(e). Carbopak C-HT 80/100 mesh, operated isothermally at 90 C. ~
(f). Porapak T 80/100 mesh, operated isothermally at l40°C.
(g). 0.2% Carbowax 1500 on 60/80 mesh Carbopack C, temperature programmed from 65°
to 70°C.
(h). 15% tetracyanoethylated pentaerythritol on 60/80 mesh Chromasorb P-AW,
operated isothermally at 80 C.
(i). 15% tetracyanoethylated pentaerythritol on 60/80 mesh Chromasorb P-AW,
operated isothermally at 100 C.
(j). 10% SP-1000 on 80/100 mesh Chromasorb WHP, temperature programmed from 75°C.
(k). 20% SP-2100 on 80/100 mesh Supelcoport, operated isothermally at 40° or -
70 C or temperature programmed from 50 C, depending on other anal-
ytes of interest. See referenced method for details.
(1). 10% OV-101 on Chromasorb WHP, operated isothermally at 100 C.
(m). 10% OV-101 on Chromasorb WHP, operated isothermally at 60° or 100°C.
(n). Durapak n-octane on Porasil C, operated isothermally at 30 C.
(o). 1% SP-1000 on Carbopack B, operated isothermally at 55°C for 12 minutes.
(p). 10% OV-101 on Chromasorb WHP, operated isothermally at 60°C.
(q). 0.1% SP-1000 on Carbopack C, operated isothermally at 90°C.
(r). 3% OV-1 on 100/120 Gas Chrom Q, operated isothermally at 135 C.
(s). For benzene in the presence of aliphatics, 10% 1,2,3-tris (2-cyanoethoxy)
propane (TCEP) on 80/100 Chromasorb P AW.
(t). For benzene with separation of xylene isomers, 5% SP-1200/1.75% Bentone 34 on
100/120 mesh Supelcoport, operated isothermally at 75°C.
(u). 10% OV-275 on 100/120 mesh Chromasorb W-AW, operated isothermally at 50°C or
temperature programmed starting at 50 C for 3 minutes followed by
15°C/min increase to 200°C.
(v). 10% FFAP on 80/100 Acid-washed Chromasorb W, operated isothermally at 125°C.
(w). 10% OV-275 on 100/120 mesh Chromasorb W-AW, operated isothermally at 50°
or 100 C or temperature programmed starting at 50°C for 3 minutes followed
by 15°C/min increase to 200 C.
(x). For meta-xylene, 10% OV-101 on Chromasorb WHP, operated isotheramlly at 60°,
120°, or 140°C.
(y)• 3% OV-225 on 80/100 mesh Supelcoport, operated isothermally at 163 C.
(z). 10% SP-2100/0.1% Carbowax 1500 on 100/120 mesh Supelcoport, temperature
programmed from 50° to 170°C at 10°C/min.
(aa). 20% SP-2100/0.1% Carbowax 1500 on 100/120 mesh Supelcoport, operated isother-
mally between 55 and 75°C.
(bb). Chromasorb 101, operated isothermally at 180 C.
(cc). 0.1% SP-1000 on Carbopack C, operated isothermally at 180 C.
(dd). 50/80 mesh Porapak Q, operated isothermally at 135 C.
(continued)
-------
Section No. 3«l6
Date June 30, 1988
Page 20
X-*v
(ee). 80/100 mesh Porapak QS, operated isothermally at 150°C.
APPENDIX I to TABLE D. (Continued)
(ee). 80/100 mesh Porapak QS, ope
(ff). 50/80 mesh Porapak Q, operated isothermally at 145UC.
(gg). 10% SP-1000 on 80/100 mesh Supelcoport, operated isothermally at 50 C.
(hh). 3% OV-210 on 80/100 mesh Gas Chrom Q, operated isothermally at 50 C.
(ii). 20% SP-2100/0.1% Carbowax 1500 on 100/200 mesh Supelcoport, operated
isothermally at 100°C.
(jj). 10% SP-1000 on 80/100 mesh Supelcoport, operated isothermally at 70 C.
(kk). 3% Carbowax 1500 on 60/80 mesh Chromasorb WHP, operated isothermally at
50°C.
(11). 1% SP-1000 on Carbopack B, operated isothermally at 120 C.
(mm). 10% SP-1000 on 80/100 mesh Supelcoport, operated isothermally at 75 C.
(nn). 10% SP-1000 on 80/100 mesh Supelcoport, operated isothermally at 60 C.
(oo). 10% SP-1000 on 80/100 mesh Supelcoport, operated isothermally at 100 C.
(pp). 80/100 mesh Chromasorb 102, operated isothermally at 110 C.
(qq). 10% FFAP on 100/120 mesh Chromasorb WHP, operated isothermally at 65 C.
(rr). 80/100 mesh Chromasorb 102, operated isothermally at 100 C.
(ss). 5% OV-101 on 80/100 Chromasorb WAP, operated isothermally at 35 C.
(tt). 10% SP-1000 on 80/100 mesh Supelcoport, operated isothermally between 60
and 90°C.
(uu). 10% OV-101 on 100/120 mesh Supelcoport, operated isothermally at 90°C.
(w). 10% OV-101 on Chromasorb WHP, operated isothermally at 50° or 100 C.
(ww). 10% SP-1000 on 80/100 mesh Supelcoport, operated isothermally at 130°C.
(xx). 10% OV-101 on 100/120 mesh Supelcoport, operated isoth'ermally at 70°C. S~\.
(yy). 50/80 mesh Porapak Q, operated isothermally at 150 C. I )
(zz). 100/120 mesh Durapack OPN in silanized glass, operated isothermally at 65 C. ^-"
(aaa). 10% FFAP on 100/120 mesh Chroraasorb WHP, operated isothermally at HQ°C.
(bbb). 10% SP-1000 on 80/100 mesh Supelcoport, operated isothermally at 105 C.
(ccc). 80/100 mesh Chromasorb 102, operated isothermally at 100°C.
(ddd). For sources where acetaldehyde is present, use column cited in (ccc)
followed by a column of 20% GE SF-96 on 60/80 mesh Chromasorb P AW or
80/100 mesh Porapak T connected in series, operated isothermally at 120 C.
(eee). 10% SE-30 on 80/100 Chromasorb W, operated isothermally at 60°C.
(fff). 0.4% Carbowax on Carbopack C, operated isothermally at 50°C.
(ggg). 1.5 OV-17 plus 1.95% OV-210.
(hhh). 5% OV-101 on Chromasorb WHP, operated isothermally at 60°C.
(iii). 10% OV-101 on Chromasorb WHP, operated isothermally at 50° or 100°C.
(JjJ). 10% OV-101 on Chromasorb WHP, operated isothermally at 100°C or 10% SP-2100
on Supelcoport, operated isothermally at 100°C.
(kkk). 10% SP-1000 on 80/100 mesh Supelcoport, operated isothermally at 150°C.
(111). 1% SP-1000 on 60/80 mesh Carbopack, temperature programmed starting at 40 C
for 3 minutes, followed by 8 C/min increase to 200°C.
(mmm). 15% FFAP on Anakrom A.
(nnn). 10% FFAP on 80/100 mesh Chromosorb W AW-DMCS, operated isothermally at 52 C.
o
-------
Section No. 3-16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 21
TABLE E. RECOMMENDED CALIBRATION TECHNIQUES FOR SELECTED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY METHOD 18
Selected Compounds
Methods for Direct Interface
and Tedlar Bag Samples
Gas
Cylinders
Gas
Injection
Into
Tedlar Bag
Liquid
Injection
Into
Tedlar Bag
Methods for Adsorption
Tube Samples
Prepare
Standard in
Desorption
Liquid
Prepare
Standard
on Tube
and Desorb
Alcohols
Methanol
Ethanol
Isopropyl Alcohol
n-Propyl Alcohol
n-Butyl Alcohol
Cyclohexane
Hexane
Ethylene
Propylene
1,3-Butadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
T-4
U
U
U
U
T-4
T-A
T-4
T-4
A-10
U
N
N
N
N
N
Alkanes
N
N
Alkenes
U
U
Dienes
R-10
N
U
U
U
U
U
u
u
N
N
N
U
R-6
R-7
R-7
R-8
R-8
R-9
R-9
U
u
R-41
R-ll
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
U
U
U
T
Aromatlcs
Benzene
Mesitylene
Ethylbenzene
Cunene
Xylene (m-,o-,p-)
Toluene
Styrene
2-Napthylanine
R-12(SRM 1806)
U
U
U
T-4
T-4
U
U
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
U
A-12
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
R-9. 13
u
R-13
R-13
R-13
R-9. 13
R-13
R-lA
T
U
T
T
T
T
T
T
Ketones
Acetone
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Ethylene Oxide
Propylene Oxide
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Sulfide
U
T-4
T-4
T-4
T-A
u
N
N
N
Epoxldes
U
U
Sulfldes
U
U
U
U
N
N
U
R-15
R-16
R-15
R-17
R-18
u
T
T
T
T
T
u
(continued)
-------
Section No. 3.16
Date June 30, 1988
Page 22
o
TABLE E. (Continued)
Selected Compounds
Methods for Direct Interface
and Tedlar Bag Samples
Gas
Cylinders
Gas
Injection
into
Tedlar Dag
Liquid
Injection
into
Tedlar Bag
Methods for Adsorption
Tube Samples
Prepare
Standard in
Desorptlon
Liquid
Prepare
Standard
on Tube
and Desorb
Halogenated
Ethylidene Chloride
Ethylene Dibroialde
Ethylene Dichloride
Propylene Dichloride
1,1. 1-Trichloroe thane
Bromodichlorome thane
Chi o rod ibromome thane
Chloroform
Carbon Tetrachloride
Dichlorodif luorome thane
Methyl Bromide
Methyl Chloride
Methylene Chloride
Tetrachloroethylene
BroiBoform
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorotrifluoroe thane
Vinylidene Chloride
Ethyl Chloride
Chlorobenzene
Vinyl Chloride
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
U
T-4
R-21
T-4
R-21
U
U
R-23
R-23
U
U
U
R-21
R-21(SRM 1809)
U
R-21
R-21
T-A
U
T-4
R-30
U
N
N
N
N
N
U
U
N
N
U
U
U
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
A-30
N
U
N-31
A-21
U
A-21
U
U
A-23
A-23
N
N
N
A-21
A-21
V
A-21
A-21
U
U
U
N
U
R-19
R-20
R-19
R-22
R-19
U
U
R-19
R-19
R-24
R-25
R-26
R-32
R-33
R-19
R-3*
B-35
R-28
R-29
R-19
R-3&
R-37
T
T
T
T
T
U
U
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
O
Rating Code
R « Recommended.
A « Acceptable.
T » Theoretical.
Based on actual source test experience (sampling and analysis) this method
is valid and is the method of choice among Method 18 users.
Based on actual source tests or similar source test experience (sampling and
analysis), this method is valid. The tester must evaluate for specific
test.
Method has no documented sampling and analysis experience, but in theory
could be valid.
N « Not Recommended. Based on actual source tests or similar source test experience and/or
theory, this method is invalid.
U » Unknown.
Method has no documented experience and the theoretical aspects are not
conclusive. The tester must demonstrate that this calibration method Is
valid.
The rating codes for calibration procedures are based on procedures specified in applicable
sampling and/or analytical methods. For example, the rating code for benzene is: R-12(SRM 1806);
N; A-12; R-9>13! T. This means that for benzene, the recommended calibration procedure for direct
interface and Tedlar bag samples involves the use of gas cylinders with the procedures described
in citation 12 in Section 3.16.11 and Standard Reference Material 1806 (available from the
National Bureau of Standards, Galthersburg, MD); calibration standards for benzene prepared by gas
injection into Tedlar bags is not recommended; calibration standards prepared by liquid injection
into Tedlar bag* io acceptable following the procedures described in citation 12 in Section
3.16.11; preparation of calibration standards in desorption liquid is the recommended procedure
for the adsorption tube methods described in citations 9 and 13 in Section 3-l6.ll; preparation of
calibration standards on adsorption tubes followed by deaorption is theoretically valid for use
with adsorption tube samples.
O
Qf**
-------
Section No. 3.16.1
Date June 30, 1988
Page 1
1.0 PROCUREMENT OF APPARATUS AND SUPPLIES
For Method 18, a number of different sampling and analytical procedures are
considered acceptable for the identification and measurement of the majority of
gaseous organic compounds emitted from industrial sources. Persons attempting to
apply these procedures are advised to consult the tables presented in the Method
Highlights Section. The Method Highlights Section is intended to provide guidance,
based on current EPA methodology, for selection of the most suitable sampling and
analytical protocols for organic compounds of interest to Federal, State, and local
agencies. For situations where EPA methodology is not applicable, guidance for
selection of sampling and analytical protocols based on methodology from other
reputable organizations is provided. Once a suitable sampling and analytical
protocol has been selected, then procurement of the necessary apparatus and sup-
plies can begin.
A number of the sampling and analytical methodologies covered by Method 18
are common to both presurvey sampling and analysis and final sampling and analysis.
Presurvey sample collection can employ either glass sampling flasks (not employed
for final sampling), Tedlar bags, or adsorption tubes. Apparatus to determine the
moisture content, temperature, and static pressure of the source emissions may be
required during presurvey sampling if this information is not available from plant
personnel. Method 18 also describes several different calibration techniques for
use depending on the available calibration materials and the sampling and
analytical techniques used. Confirmation of target compounds in presurvey samples
may require analysis by means other than GC alone, such as GC/mass spectrometry
(GC/MS) or GC/infrared spectrometry (GC/IR). For the final sampling, in addition
to Tedlar bags and adsorption tubes, direct interface sampling and dilution inter-
face sampling are described. Analysis of the final samples utilizes the procedures
developed and optimized during presurvey sample analysis.
The descriptions of the apparatus and supplies that follow apply to items
needed for both presurvey and final sampling and analysis, except as noted. As
described above, all of the following equipment may not be required. The following
procedures and descriptions are only provided as guidance to the tester and are not
requirements of the method. Table 1.1 at the end of this section contains a
summary of quality assurance activities for procurement and acceptance of apparatus
and supplies.
1.1 Sampling '
Guidance for the selection of a suitable sampling technique for a particular
compound can be found in Table B of the Method Highlights Section.
1.1.1 All Sampling Procedures - The following apparatus will be required for all
presurvey and final sampling procedures. Use of alternative equipment requires
the approval of the Administrator.
Sampling System Check - Because of the number of sampling systems, volatile
organic compounds, and process operating conditions, the exact criteria for check-
ing the sampling system can only be determined using the presurvey sampling data.
Upon receipt of all the components to construct the sampling system, the system
should be assembled and checked over the intended range of use (i.e., sample flow
rate, duct temperatures).
-------
O
O
Section No. 3.16.1
Date June 30, 1988
Page 2
Sampling Probe - The sampling probe should (1) be constructed of stainless
steel, Pyrex glass, or Teflon tubing, (2) exhibit an outside diameter (OD) of 6.4
mm, (3) be enlarged at the duct end to contain a glass wool plug, and (4) possess a
heating system capable of maintaining the sample temperature at 0° to 3°C above
duct temperature. The expanded section of the probe must be packed with glass wool
prior to sampling. The probe outlet must have a fitting suitable for attachment to
the sample line. A probe approximately 1.1 m (4 ft) long is usually sufficient;
the exact length can be determined during the preliminary survey. The selected
probe material should be nonreactive toward with the sample gas constituents so
that it will not bias the analysis, as well as appropriate to withstand the duct
temperature.
Upon receiving a new probe, visually check it for adherence to
specifications (i.e., the length and composition ordered). Check for breaks,
cracks, and leaks. Leak check the probe and check the probe heating system during
the sampling system check described above. The probe should be able to maintain
the required temperature at the desired flow rate and remain leak free.
Sample Line and Connecting Tubing - The sample line is generally 6.4-mm OD
Teflon tubing. Sample lines will require heat-tracing to prevent condensation of
sample constituents during sampling at some sources. The sample temperature must
be maintained at 0°C to 3°C above the source temperature. The capacity of the
heating system should be sufficient for its intended use. Upon receipt or during
the system check, the sample line should be checked to ensure that it is leak free
and will maintain the desired temperature at the desired flow rate. It should be
noted that heat-traced sample lines require a significant amount of electrical
current to maintain the higher temperature levels. The electrical requirements and
the weight of the heat-trace'd line should be taken into account when designing the
sample train.
Quick Connects - For connections on the sample lines, gas sampling valve,
the pump unit, cylinders, sample bags, and calibration gas bags, quick connects or
the equivalent are needed. When the connects come into contact with the sample
gas, they should be constructed of stainless steel. It is also useful to have
self-sealing quick connects on the sampling bags. The quick connects can be leak
checked during the system check.
Barometer - A mercury, aneroid, or other barometer capable of measuring
atmospheric pressure to within 2.5 mm (0.1 in.) Hg may be used; however, in many
cases the absolute barometric pressure can be obtained from a nearby weather
service station. If the elevation of the sampling point is higher than that of the
weather station, the reported barometric pressure is reduced at a rate of 2.5 mm
Hg/30 m (0.1 in. Hg/100 ft) of elevation difference; if the sampling point is lower
than the weather station, the pressure is increased at the same rate. Note; The
barometric pressure from the weather service station should not be corrected to sea
level.
Check the field barometer against a mercury-in-glass barometer (or its
equival'ent). If the field barometer cannot be adjusted to agree with the mercury-
in-glass barometer, it is not acceptable and should be repaired or replaced.
Moisture Determination - A moisture determination may be required. Two ( J
techniques can generally be used: (1) Method 4 or (2) wet bulb/dry bulb >•—'
thermometers. If Method 4 is used, the tester should refer to Section 3«3 of this
Handbook. If the wet bulb/dry bulb thermometers are used, both thermometers should
>
-------
Section No. 3.16.1
Date June 30, 1988
• Page 3
be accurate to within 1°C. Upon receipt, the thermometers should be checked
against a mercury-in-glass thermometer to ensure that they are reading properly.
Flow Rate Determination - The flow rate in the duct may have to be deter-
mined for some emission standards. If the flow rate is to be determined, the
tester should refer to Section 3-1 of this Handbook and meet the requirements and
follow the procedures of this method.
1.1.2 Glass Sampling Flask Sampling Technique - The following apparatus and rea-
gents will be required for the collection of samples (presurvey only) using glass
sampling flasks. Use of alternative equipment requires the approval of the
Administrator.
Purged or Evacuated Glass Sampling Flasks - Presurvey samples can be
collected in precleaned double ended glass sampling flasks possessing minimum
capacities of 250 ml. Teflon stopcocks, without grease, are preferred. Upon
receipt, flasks should be checked to ensure that they are not broken. Flasks must
be cleaned prior to use. The cleaning procedures are described later in Subsection
3.2. If the flasks do not meet these requirements, replace or reclean.
1.1.3 Tedlar Bag/Evacuated Container and Adsorption Tube Sampling - The following
apparatus will be required for the collection of presurvey or final samples using
adsorption tubes or Tedlar bags housed in evacuable containers. If the apparatus
are purchased separately, each item should be checked individually as described
below. Following this, all components should be assembled, as they will be used in
the field and then checked using the following procedures:
1. Assemble the sample train as described in Subsection 4.3-1.
2. Leak check the train as described in Subsection 4.3.1.
3. Attach a primary gas test meter to the inlet of the sample train and
pull the desired flow rate through the sample train for the typical
sample run time. The measured volume should be within 10% of the
calculated volume or rate. If the system does not meet these
requirements, replace or repair and then recalibrate.
Tedlar Bags (For Sampling and to Prepare Gaseous Calibration Standards)-
Bags used to collect field samples and prepare gaseous calibration standards must
be constructed of a suitable material, be leak free, and have the proper fittings.
Typically, self-sealing quick disconnects are used on the sample bags. Tedlar is
the material of choice for the sample bags, however other materials may be used
successfully. If the sample bags are constructed by the tester, they are generally
double-sealed. The exact bags to be used in the field test or for making calibra-
tion standards must pass three criteria as follows:
1. Bags must pass the leak check as described in Subsection 4.3-1.
2. The organic components that are to be collected in the bags should be
placed in a bag at about the same concentration for which it will be
used, and the organic concentration in the bag determined as soon as
possible after this. The organics should then remain in the bag for a
period equal to the time anticipated between field sampling and
analysis. The concentration, upon reanalysis, must be within 10% of
the original concentration.
3. Next, the bag should be emptied and refilled with zero air or nitrogen.
It should be allowed to sit for, at least 2 hours and then be
reanalyzed; the concentration of the organic(s) in the bag must be
-------
Section No. 3-16.1
Date June 30, 1988
Page 4
less than 10% of the original concentration.
If the bags do not pass the leak checkt they must be reconstructed. If they do not
pass the second and third criteria, a different material of construction or a
different sampling technique must be used. If the bags do not meet these require-
ments, replace, use an alternative technique or use a different sampling technique.
Rigid Leak-Proof Container - Rigid leak-proof containers must be of the
proper size to fit the bags and are generally made of rigid plastic. However, the
material of construction is typically not important since the container does not
come into contact with the sample gas. Containers usually have a clear top or
window in them to check that the bag1 does not overfill during testing. The top of
the container must have connections to attach the sample probe to the outside and
the sample bag to the inside. A connection for the sample pump must also be
available on the container. Upon receipt or construction of the container,
assemble the system as it will be used in the field and then leak check it at the
maximum vacuum anticipated. Inflate a bag to the degree it will be filled in the
field and check that the bag can be removed after it has been filled to allow
external heating. If the bag system is designed to keep the bag at a specified
temperature, then the heating system must be checked as described below in
Subsection 1.1.6. If the container does not meet these requirements, modify,
repair, or replace it.
Pump - For the indirect sampling technique (pump after the bag or charcoal
tube), any pump of proper capacity can be used. If the pump is to be used for a
direct sampling technique {pump in the sample line), the pump internals must be
leakless and made of stainless steel or, preferably, Teflon. Upon receipt, check
for proper specifications. If the pump does not meet the specifications, repair or
replace it.
Flowmeter - The flowmeter must be of the proper flow rate range. Upon
receipt, check the specifications and then calibrate as described in Subsection
2.1.3. If the flowmeter does not meet the requirements, replace or recalibrate it.
Adsorption Tube - An absorption tube must (1) be of adequate capacity, (2)
contain the proper adsorption material, and (3) consist of a primary and secondary
section. The selection of the proper type and size of adsorption tube should be
based on previous experience (including the literature and tables in the Method
Highlights) or laboratory evaluation. The selection and/or evaluation of the
proper adsorption tube is described in detail in Subsection 3.4. The criteria
shown in Subsection 3'4 must be met or the tubes must be replaced or modified.
Personnel Sampling Pump - -A personnel sampling pump can be used for
collecting adsorbent tube simples. It must sample at or be adjustable to the
proper flow rate range. Upon receipt, check the specifications and calibrate as
described in Subsection 2.1.4. If it does not meet the specifications, replace or
calibrate it.
1.1.4 Direct Pump Sampling Procedure - The direct pump sampling procedure will
require the same apparatus described in Section 1.1.3 for bag and adsorption tube ^^^
sampling. The only difference is that the pump internals must be constructed of (]
materials that will not interfere in the analysis (i.e., Teflon or stainless steel) \ J
and the rigid container does not have to be leak free. The system should be
assembled, leak checked and then the flow rate checked as described above. If the
o
-------
Section No. 3-16.1
Date June 30, 1988
Page 5
system does not meet the criteria, then it must be replaced or repaired and then
leak checked and recalibrated.
1.1.5 Explosion Eisk Bag Sampling Procedure - The following apparatus, in addition
to the apparatus described in Subsection 1.1.3, will be required for collection of
bag samples in areas where there is any possibility of explosion. These procedures
assume that the sample gas collected is not above the lower explosive limit. If it
is, a complete safety plan should be developed and reviewed by the plant and
tester. This Handbook will not attempt to describe the procedures used to collect
explosive gases.
The major concern in most areas having an explosion potential is that no open
flames or non-intrinsically safe electrical equipment be used. The first approach
to sampling in these areas is to remove the electrial systems (i.e., pumps) to an
area that is not explosive. This can be accomplished by running the vacuum line
from an area that is not explosive to the sample bag or charcoal tube in the
explosive area. The vacuum line can be run up to 200 to 300 feet with no problems.
Sampling is then conducted in the normal manner.
Another approach described in Method 18 uses a steel canister to provide the
vacuum source. This approach is difficult and can still be hazardous because it
involves handling a steel container, and possibly a stainless steel probe, in an
explosive area. Another alternative is the use of an intrinsically safe pump, such
as a personnel sampling pump, with adsorption tubes or Tedlar bags housed in
evacuable containers. Any system that is purchased or constructed must be
leakless, be able to control the flow rate properly, and meet all plant safety
requirements.
1.1.6 Heated Bag Sampling Procedure - This procedure must be used in the event
that condensation is observed in the bag and/or sample line during testing or if
the sample bag retains more than 10% of the sample concentration based on the post-
test sample bag retention check. The apparatus described below will be required,
in addition to the apparatus described in Subsection 1.1.3- Both the sample line
and container must be heated to maintain the bag at a specified temperature (i.e.,
0°C to 3°C above source temperature). The sampling system is checked in the manner
described above, except that the heating system must also be considered; check
procedures should consider use of the system at ambient temperatures less than the
laboratory temperature (including wind chill factors). The entire surface of the
sample probe and the sample bag must be maintained at the specified temperature.
A possible alternative to maintaining the bag at the specified temperature is the
addition of external heating with heat lamps prior to analysis. The exact system
that will be suitable for any given source should be determined prior to testing,
if possible. The operation and checks of heated sampling systems are described in
Subsection 4.3- If the system does not meet all the criteria, use a different
approach or repair the system and recalibrate.
Heated Bag Sample Container - The heated bag sample container must be
capable of maintaining the entire bag at the specified temperature. If an
electrical source is used to heat the container, the tester must be aware of the
additional explosion potential that is created. One check on the system can be
made with a thermocouple in the sample cavity; this check of the system will not,
however, demonstrate that all the surfaces are maintained at the required
temperature. All external surfaces of the container should be well insulated. A
visual check of the system should reveal if the system appears to be sufficiently
insulated. If the system allows the bag to have cooler surfaces, the posttest
7
-------
Section No. 3.16.1
Date June 30, 1988
Page 6
retention check on the bag will probably fail.
o
Heated Sample Lines and Probe - The sample probe and sample line must also
be capable of maintaining the specified temperature. They should also not have any
cooler surfaces. These can be checked by pulling the desired flow rate through
them and then checking the temperature in the line and/or probe with a
thermocouple. Proper insulation is necessary to maintain the temperature
throughout the entire length. If the temperature cannot be maintained, replace or
repair the line and/or probe and then recheck.
1.1.7 Prefilled Tedlar Bag Sampling Procedure - This procedure is an alternative '
to the heated bag sampling procedure. The following apparatus and reagents are
required for this procedure, in addition to the apparatus described in Subsections
1.1.3 and 1.1.4. The prefilled bag sampling system is used to dilute the
concentration of the condensibles below saturation. This system can also be used
to dilute the gases to below the lower explosive limit. The major difference
between the prefilled bag sampling system and the other bag sampling systems is
that the volume of diluent gas added to the sample bag and the volume of - gas
sampled must be accurately measured. The dilution must be accounted for in the
calculation of the measured gas concentration. Therefore, the diluent gas must be
added with a calibrated dry gas meter or a calibrated flowmeter; then, during
sample collection, the gas collected must be accurately measured using a flowmeter
or a metered pump. To obtain the required accuracy, the flowmeter and pump are
placed in the sample line prior to the sample bag. Since condensation may occur,
the flowmeter and pump must be housed in a heated box. This system is checked in
the same manner as a dilution system (see Subsection 1.1.9). The check for the
prefilled system is described in Subsection 4.3-4.
Heated Flowmeter - A calibrated heated flowmeter is required to accurately
determine the volume of gas sampled. The flowmeter should be housed in a heated
box that will maintain the specified temperature. The flowmeter should be
calibrated as described above in Subsection 2.1.3. If the criteria are not met,
replace or repair and then recalibrate. A metering type pump may be used to
replace the flow rate meter and the pump.
Positive Displacement Teflon-Lined Pump - A positive displacement pump lined
with Teflon or constructed of stainless steel, of proper capacity and contained in
a heated box is required. A Teflon-coated diaphram-type pump that can withstand
120°C and delivers 1.5 liters/minute is typically used. Upon receipt, check the
pump for capacity and then conduct a leak check on the pump. The pump must be
leak free at all vacuum settings. The heating system will be checked during the
sampling system check. If the pump is not of the correct capacity and not leak
free, then replace or repair it.
Heated Box for Flowmeter and Pump - The flowmeter and pump must be contained
in a heated box to maintain the proper temperature. Construct the box such that
the temperature can be controlled and monitored. After construction, check the
system to ensure that it will maintain the desired temperature(s). If it will not
maintain the temperature(s), repair the unit.
1.1.8 Direct Interface Sampling Procedure - A heated probe, heated sample line,
heated gas sampling valve, needle valve, and charcoal adsorber are required for
direct interface sampling. The required apparatus and reagents pertaining to the
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.1
Date June 30, 1988
Page 7
gas chromatograph are described below in Subsection 1.2. After the individual
components are checked as shown below, the sampling system should be assembed as
shown in Subsection 4.3.6 and checked using the following procedures:
1. Turn on the heating system and adjust to the maximum temperature at
which it is to be used.
2. Connect the inlet to the sampling probe. After the heating system has
stabilized at the temperature setting, turn on the pump and evacuate
to about 10 in. of H20. The system must be leak free; no flow should
be observed from the charcoal adsorber system. If the system is not
leak free, repair the system.
3. After the system has 'been shown to be leak free, adjust the needle
valve until the flow rate that will be used in the field is obtained.
The temperature at the discharge of the heated sample valve should be
at the set temperature. Insert a thermocouple into the inlet of the
probe to insure that the first several feet of the probe and line are
properly heated. If the set temperature is not obtained, repair the
system or use the temperature obtained for a recalibration of the
temperature setting.
Heated Probe and Sample Lines - The. sample probe and sample line must be
equipped with a heating system and insulation. All of the interior surfaces must
be maintained at the temperature setting. Although all the interior surfaces can
not be easily checked, installing proper insulation and following the system check
shown above should be sufficient to determine the adequacy of the probe and sample
line heating system.
Heated Gas Sampling Valve - A heated sampling valve (which includes the
sample loops) is required to maintain the sample injected into the GC at the
desired temperature. The sample valve and loop are generally enclosed in an oven
in which the temperature can be controlled and monitored. Upon receipt, check the
temperature controller.
Charcoal Adsorber - The charcoal adsorber is required to remove the organics
from the excess flow.through the system. Since the charcoal adsorber is used only
for tester safety, there are no requirements on the adsorber. However, since the
charcoal will be spent with time, the tester should change it periodically.
Alternatively, the flow can be vented at a safe distance away from any personnel.
1.1.9 Dilution Interface Sampling Procedure - In addition to the apparatus des-
cribed in Subsection 1.1.8, dilution pumps, flowmeters and valves which are con-
tained in a heated box, and diluent gases are required for the dilution interface
system. The calibration of the dilution system is described in Subsection 2.2.
The individual components should be checked as shown below and then the system
should be calibrated as described in Subsection 2.2. If the system does not meet
the calibration requirements, it should be replaced, or repaired and recalibrated.
Dilution Pumps - Two Model A-150 Komhyr Teflon positive displacement-type
pumps, or equivalent models capable of delivering 150 cc/minute, are required.
Alternatively, calibrated flowmeters can be used in conjunction with Teflon-coated
diaphram pumps. Upon receipt calibrate the pumps, or flowiaeter and pump as
described in Subsection 2.1. If the "pumps do not meet the calibration
requirements, replace or repair and then recalibrate.
-------
Section No. 3-16.1
Date June 30, 1988
Page 8
Floimeters - Two flowmeters are required to measure the diluent gas, at a
rate of about 1350 cc/minute. Upon receipt, the flowmeters should be calibrated as
described in Subsection 2.1. If the flowmeters do not meet the calibration
critera, replace or repair and then recalibrate.
Diluent Gas - Diluent gas in cylinders fitted with regulators are required
for sample dilution. Nitrogen or hydrocarbon-free air can be used depending on the
nature of the source gases. Alternatively, ambient air can be cleaned and dried
with charcoal and silica gel. The organics in the dilutent gas must be below the
detection limit.
Heated Box for Sample Dilution System - The pumps and control valves must be
housed in a heated box to control and monitor the temperature. After construction
or receipt, check the temperature control system. If the box cannot maintain the
desired temperature, replace or repair and recheck.
1.2 Sample Analysis
The analysis of Method 18 samples requires the use of a gas chromatograph
(GC) regardless of the technique used for either presurvey or final sampling.
Guidance for the selection of suitable GC detectors is provided in Table C in the
Method Highlights Section. As a starting point for the analysis of the presurvey
sample. Table D in the Method Highlights Section provides guidance for the
selection of a suitable packed GC column. Any interferences with the GC analysis
may be source-specific, so the most suitable analytical system must be established
using the presurvey samples. The following apparatus will be required for the GC
analysis.
1.2.1 Gas Chromatograph - A GC equipped with a suitable detector as specified in
Table C in the Method Highlights Section. The GC shall be equipped with a
temperature-controlled sample loop and valve assembly for analysis of gas samples
or a temperature-controlled injection port for analysis of liquid samples from
adsorption tubes. Use of alternative techniques for introducing samples into the
GC requires the approval of the Administrator. The GC should be equipped with a
temperature-controlled oven, while a temperature-programmable oven may also be
required for some analyzers. Method 18 may be used to quantify gaseous organic
compounds at concentrations ranging from about 1 part-per-million (pptn) to the
upper range governed by detector saturation or column overloading. For the
combination of GC options chosen, the lower limit of quantitation, as defined by
Knoll'12, for the target organic compounds should be less than the emission limit
for the particular source being tested.
1.2.2 GC Column - Guidance for the selection of the appropriate GC column is
provided in Table D in the Method Highlights Section. The columns listed in
Appendix I to Table D have been found to work for analysis of the corresponding
organic compounds under certain conditions. Since interfering compounds may be
source-specific. Method 18 permits the use of any GC column, provided the following
precision and accuracy are achieved:
Precision: Duplicate analyses within 5 percent of their mean value.
Accuracy: Analysis results of an audit sample within 10 percent of the
prepared value.
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.1
Date June 30, 1988
Page 9
In addition, resolution of interfering compounds from target compounds should be
achieved. For determining whether acceptable resolution has been achieved, follow
the procedures described in Appendix C "Quality Assurance Procedures", Procedure 1
"Determination of Adequate Chromatographic Peak Resolution."*3
1.2.3 Recorder - A linear strip chart recorder is required, as a minimum, to
record the GC detector output. Alternatively, an electronic integrator may be
used and is generally recommended.
1.2.4 Recorder or Electronic Integrator Paper - Consult operator's manual or
manufacturer for correct type.
1.2.5 Regulators - Gas cylinder regulators will be required for use of the gas
cylinders described in Subsections 1.3.1, 1.3-2, and 1.3«3« Consult with suppliers
of gas cylinders to determine the proper type of regulator required.
1.2.6 Tubing and Fittings - Tubing and fittings will be required to connect the
gas cylinder regulators to the GC.
1.3 Reagents and Glassware
The exact reagents and glassware required depend on the sampling procedure
chosen, the calibration techniques to be used, and the particular requirements of
the GC system.
1.3.1 GC Carrier Gas - The carrier gas selected must be hydrocarbon-free. The
type of carrier gas depends on the type of GC detector and GC column being used.
Consult the GC operator's manual, the GC manufacturer, and/or the column
manufacturer for recommendations on the optimum carrier gas for a particular appli-
cation .
1.3.2 Auxiliary GC Gases - Certain GC detectors will require auxiliary gases for
proper operation. Consult the GC operator's manual or the GC manufacturer for
recommendations on a particular application.
1.3.3 Calibration Gases - These include cylinder gases containing known
concentrations of target organic compounds for preparation of GC calibration
standards, direct use as GC calibration standards, or calibration of a dilution
interface system. If gases are not available in the required concentrations for GC
calibration, procure the reagents and glassware described in Subsections 1.3.4
through 1.3.7.
1.3.4 Zero Gas - Hydrocarbon-free air or nitrogen, for preparing gaseous cali-
bration standards from calibration gas cylinders or liquid organic compounds.
1.3.5 Liquid Organic Compounds - Pure or high purity liquid (occasionally gaseous)
samples of all the organics for which calibration standards will be prepared.
1.3.6 Syringes - Calibrated, gas tight 500-, 10-, and 1.0-microliter sizes with
maximum accuracy, for preparing gaseous calibration standards, for preparing
adsorption tube standards, and for injection of liquid standards and samples into
the GC. Other size gas tight syringes may be appropriate.
-------
Section No. 3.16.1
Date June 30, 1988
Page 10
1.3.7 Midget Impinger/Hot Plate Assembly - To prepare gaseous standards In Tedlar
bags from liquid organic compounds requires a midget impinger equipped with a
septum and a tee on the inlet stem and a boiling water bath on a hot plate. A dry
gas meter, previously described in Subsection 1.1.1, is also required.
1.3-8 Screw Top Septum. Vials - For preparation of adsorption tube standards and
samples, 7-ial amber screw top septum vials with Teflon-lined septa are required.
1.3-9 Desorption Liquid - For preparation of adsorption tube standards and
samples, desorption liquid is required. For the correct desorption liquid, refer
to the appropriate NIOSH method for the target compound(s) referenced in Table B in
the Method Highlights Section.
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.1
Date June 30, 1988
Page 11
Table 1.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR PROCUREMENT OF APPARATUS AND SUPPLIES
Apparatus
All Sampling
Procedures
Sampling system
check
Sampling probe
Sample line and
connecting tubing
Quick connects
Barometer
Moisture
determination
Flow rate
determination
Glass Sampling
Flask Technique
Purged or evacu-
ated sampling
flasks
Acceptance limits
Maintain proper
flow rate and
temperature
Proper material
of construction
and capable of
maintaining proper
temperature
Constructed of
Teflon and capable
of maintaining
proper temperature
Stainless steel
construction and
leak free
Capable of measuring
atmospheric pressure
to within 2.5 mm
(0.1 in.) Hg
See Section 3-3 of
this Handbook
See Section 3.1 of
this Handbook
Double ended glass
flask with Teflon
stopcocks
• • •
Frequency and method
of measurement
Upon receipt, conduct
check in specified
subsection
Visually check and
then run heating
system checkout
Visually check and
then run heating
system checkout
Visually check and
conduct leak check
Check against mercury
in-glass barometer or
equivalent
(Sec. 3-5-2)
Same as in Section 3-3
Same as in Section 3-1
Visually check upon
receipt
Action if
requirements
are not met
Repair or return
to manufacturer
Repair or return
to manufacturer
Repair or return
to manufacturer
Repair or return
to manufacturer
Determine cor-
rection factor,
or reject
Same as Sec. 3-3
Same as Sec. 3«1
Return to
manufacturer
(Continued)
-------
Section No. 3-16.1
Date June 30, 1988
Page 12
o
Table 1.1 (Continued)
Apparatus
Evacuated Con-
tainer and Adsorp-
tion Tube
Sampling
Tedlar bag
Acceptance limits
Constructed of
material in which
organics remain
stable and are not
retained; leak free
Frequency and method
of measurement
Upon receipt, leak
check and conduct
stability and
retention check
Action if
requirements
are not met
Return to man-
facturer, change
material, or
use different
sampling tech-
nique
Rigid leak-
proof container
Leak free and
of proper size
Upon receipt,
visually check and
then conduct leak
check
Repair or return
manufacturer
O
Pump
Leak free and of
proper capacity
Visually check and
then conduct leak
check and flow rate
check
Repair or return
to manufacturer
Flowmeter
Proper flow rate
range and cali-
brated
Upon receipt, check
specifications, check
visually, then
calibrate
Return to manu-
facturer or
repair and then
recalibrate
Adsorption
tube
Proper material,
adequate capacity,
and consisting of a
primary and second-
ary section
Conduct laboratory
evaluation or consult
literature
Replace or make
modification and
recheck
Personnel sampling
pump
(Continued)
Proper flow rate
range and calibrated
Upon receipt, check
specifications, then
calibrate
Return to manu-
facturer or
repair and then
recalibrate
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.1
Date June 30, 1988
Page 13
Table 1.1 (Continued)
Apparatus
Direct Pump
Sampling
Pump
Flowmeter
Explosion Risk
Bag Sampling
Nonexplosive
vacuum source
Heated Bag
Sampling
Sampling bag
Heated bag
container
Heated sample
lines and probe
Prefilled
Bag Sampling
Heated flowmeter
(Continued)
Acceptance limits
Stainless steel or
Teflon-lined, proper
capacity, leak free,
and heated
Proper flow rate
range, leak free,
and heated
Proper flow rate
capacity and
intrinsically safe
Same as above
Leak free, adequate
capacity, and
heat system
capable of main-
taining proper
temperature
Constructed of
Teflon and/or
stainless steel
Same as above
Frequency and method
of measurement
Visually check, then
conduct leak check,
flow rate check, and
system heating check
Visually check, then
conduct leak check,
flow rate check, and
heating check
Check with plant
safety rules and
check flow rate
capacity
Same as above
Visually check,
then conduct
leak check and
heating check
Visually check,
then conduct
heating check
Same as above
Action if
requirements
are not met
Return to manu-
facturer or
repair and
recalibrate
Return to manu-
facturer or
repair and
recalibrate
Return to manu-
facturer or
repair and
recheck
Same as above
Return to manu-
facturer or
repair and
recheck
Return to manu-
facturer or
repair and
recheck
Same as above
-------
Section No. 3.16.1
Date June 30, 1988
Page 14
Table 1.1 (Continued)
o
Apparatus
Stainless steel or
Teflon-lined pump
Heated box for
flowmeter and
pump
Direct
Interface
Sampling
Heated probe, pump
and sample
lines
Heated GC sample
valve
Dilution
Interface
Sampling
Stainless steel or
Teflon-lined pump
Dilution pump
Flowmeters
Diluent gas
Acceptance limits
Same as above
Proper flow rate
range and capacity;
heating system
capable of main-
taining the proper
temperature
Same as above
Proper valve and
heating system;
consult owner's
manual
Same as above
Teflon-lined
metering pump
with capacity
of 150 cc/min
Proper flow rate
range and
calibrated
Hyrocarbon-free
air, nitrogen, or
dry cleaned air
Frequency and method
of measurement
Same as above
Visually check,
then conduct
leak check, flow
rate check, and
heating check
Same as above
Visually check,
then conduct
check of heating
Same as above
Visually check,
then calibrate
Visually check,
then calibrate
Visually check cylin-
der; check cylinder
pressure; run a blank
to monitor impurities
Action if
requirements
are not met
Same as above
Return to manu-
facturer or
repair and
recheck
Same as above
Return to manu-
facturer or
repair and
recheck
Same as above
Return to manu-
facturer or
repair and
recalibrate
Return to manu-
facturer or
repair and
recalibrate
Return to
manufacturer
O
(Continued)
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.1
Date June 30, 1988
Page 15
Table 1.1 (Continued)
Apparatus
Heated box for
sample dilution
system
Sample Analysis
Gas chromatograph
GC column
Strip chart re-
corder or elec-
tronic integrator
Regulators
Reagents and
Glassware
GC carrier gas
Auxiliary gas
Calibration gas
(Continued)
Acceptance limits
Heating system with
temperature con-
troller and monitor
Suitable detector,
precision of +_ 5#t
and accuracy of
+ 10%
Adequate peak
resolution
See owner's manual
Proper CGA fittings
and pressure
control
As specified by GC
owners manual and
hydrocarbon-free
As specified by
owners manual
Proper compounds
and known concen-
tration in proper
range
Frequency and method
of measurement
Conduct heating
check
Refer to Table C
in Method Highlights
then check GC with
applicable organics
Upon receipt, use
procedure described
in 40 CFR 60, App. C
or Method 625
Upon receipt, check
as recommended by
manufacturer
Upon receipt, attach
to cylinder and leak
check
Visually check upon
receipt; check.cyl-
inder pressure
Visually check upon
receipt; check cyl-
inder pressure
Upon receipt, check
cylinder tag and
certification; check
cylinder pressure
Action if
requirements
are not met
Return to manu-
facturer or
repair and
recheck
Return to manu-
facturer or
repair and
recheck
Return to manu-
facturer or
change con-
ditions and
recheck
Repair or
return to
manufacturer
Return to manu-
facturer or
repair or
replace fitting
and recheck
Return to
manufacturer
Return to
manufacturer
Return to manu-
facturer or
remake or rename
-------
Section No. 3.16.1
Date June 30, 1988
Page 16
o
Table 1.1 (Continued)
Apparatus
Zero gas
Acceptance limits
Hydrocarbon-free
air or nitrogen
Frequency and method
of measurement
Visually 'check upon
receipt; check cyl-
inder pressure ,
Action if
requirements
are not met
Return to
manufacturer
O
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.2
Date June 30, 1988
Page 1
2.0 CALIBRATION OF APPARATUS
Calibration of the apparatus is one of the most important functions in
maintaining data quality. The detailed calibration procedures included in this
section were designed for the sampling equipment specified in Method 18 and de-
scribed in the previous section. The calibration of the analytical equipment is
described in the section detailing the analytical procedures, Section 3-16.5.
Table 2.1 at the end of this section summarizes the quality assurance functions for
the calibrations addressed in this section. All calibrations including the analyt-
ical equipment should be recorded on standardized forms and retained in a calibrat-
ion log book.
2.1 Metering Systems
2.1.1 Met Test MeteT - The wet test meter must be calibrated and have the proper
capacity. For Method 18, the wet test meter should have a capacity of about 1
L/min. No upper limit is placed on the capacity; however, the wet test meter dial
should make at least one complete revolution at the specified flow rate for each of
the three independent calibrations.
Wet test meters are calibrated by the manufacturers to an accuracy of ± 2%.
Calibration of the wet test meter must be checked upon receipt and yearly there-
after. A liquid positive displacement technique can be used to verify and adjust,
if necessary, the accuracy of the wet test meter to +_ 2%. This technique is de-
scribed in Sections 3-5.2, 3.8.2, and 3.15.2 of the Handbook.
2.1.2 Dry Gas Meter - A dry gas meter is required for gas and liquid injection
calibrations, to prefill bags prior to sampling using the prefilled bag dilution
technique, and/or to calibrate the flow rate meters. For Method 18, the dry gas
meter is the same size or smaller than the dry gas meter typically used for Method
6. The meter must have an accuracy of +_ 3% for the flow rate and sample volume
used. Calibration of the dry gas meter must be conducted initially upon receipt,
quarterly when utilized to make laboratory calibration standards, and following
each field test series for field use. The calibration procedures are described in
Section 3.5.2 of this Handbook.
2.1.3 Flow Rate Meter(s) - Flow rate meters are needed for (1) sampling and (2)
making calibration standards. Since they are used to determine flow rate and for
total volume determinations, the flow rate meter(s) selected must have an accuracy
of +_ 3% for the flow rate and total sample volume for which they are used.
Acceptable flow rate meters include rotameters, critical orifices, mass
flowmeters, and dry gas meters. If data from the flow rate meter is used only as
an indicator of the flow rate and is not used in any of the emission calculations,
then the accuracy of +_ 3% does not apply. While it is desirable to calibrate the
gas flowmeter with the cylinder gas to be measured, the quantity available and cost
may preclude it. The error introduced by using the diluent gas for calibration in
place of the actual gas to be measured is insignificant for gas mixtures of up to
1,000 to 2,000 ppm.
Initial Calibration - The flow metering system should be calibrated when
first purchased and at any time the posttest calibration yields a calibration
factor that does not agree within 5% of the pretest calibration factor. A
(//(*
-------
Section No. 3.16.2
Date June 30, 1988
Page 2
calibrated wet test meter, calibrated dry gas meter, or a properly sized bubble
meter should be used to calibrate the metering system.
The flow rate meter should be calibrated in the following manner before its
initial use in the field.
1. Leak check the flow rate meter and pump as follows:
a. Temporarily attach a suitable rotameter (e.g., 0-40 cm3/min) to
the outlet of flow rate system. The pump should be placed either
before or after the flow rate meter based on where it will be used.
Place a vacuum gauge at the inlet to the drying tube.
b. Plug the flow rate system inlet. Evacuate to a pressure at least
equal to the lowest pressure that will be encountered during use. If
the system usually operates at or near atmospheric conditions, then
pull a vacuum of 25 mm (1 in.) Hg.
c. Note the flow rate as indicated by the rotameter.
d. A leak of £0.02 L/min must be recorded or leaks > 0.02 L/min must be
eliminated.
2. Attach the wet test meter, bubble meter, or calibrated dry gas meter to
the inlet of the flow rate metering system.
3. Run the pump for 15 minutes with the flow rate set at the midrange flow to
allow the pump to warm up and to permit the interior surface of the wet
test meter to become wet.
4. Collect the information required in the forms provided {Figure 2.1A
(English units) or 2.IB (metric units) when calibrating a dry gas meter ,
rotameter, or mass flow meter, and Figure 2.2A (English units) or 2.2B
(metric units) when calibrating a critical orifice} using sample volumes
equivalent to at least five revolutions of the dry test meter. Three
independent runs must be made.
a. For critical orifices, runs will be conducted at the single flow rate
of the orifice meter. The runs should be at three different vacuums
that are greater than one half an atmosphere (i.e., 18, 19 and 20 in.
Hg.). This is to demonstrate that the orifice yields the same
flowrate at all critical vacuums.
b. For rotameters, mass flow meters, and dry gas meters, runs will be
conducted at three different flow rates over the range to be used
(top, middle, and bottom of range).
5. Calculate the Yx for each run for the dry gas meter, rotameter and mass
flowmeter or calculate the K' for the critical orifice as shown on the
data forms. Adjust and recalibrate or reject the dry gas meter,
rotameter, or mass flow meter if one or more values of Yj fall outside the
interval Y +_ 0.03Y, where Y is the average for three runs. Otherwise, the
Y (calibration factor) is acceptable and is to be used for future checks
and subsequent test runs. The K' should be within 3# of the average for
all three runs. If this is not true, reject the orifice or repeat the
calibration until acceptable results are obtained. The completed form
should be forwarded to the supervisor for approval, and then filed in the
calibration log book.
Posttest Calibration Check - After each field test series, conduct a calibra-
tion check as described above in Subsection 2.1 concerning the initial calibration
with the following exceptions:
o
o
o
-------
// /ftfl Calibrated by AT ^ Meter system no.
in. Hg Ambient temperature
Barometric pressure, Pa =
Type of primary meter: wet test
Type of flowmeter calibrated: rotameter X i dry gas meter
-fC> Primary meter no.
, dry gas
, or bubble meter
, or mass flowmeter
Primary meter readings
Initial
reading
(\J \ a
*pi ' •
ft3
0
0
O
Final
reading
I\J \ a
\vpf I •
ft3
0.10(*(,
O.lObb
/• 00-04
Initial
temp,°F
(tpi)
oF
tf
90
•9-0
Final
temp,°F
(tpf)
oF
CffCj
W
9-ft
Press
drop
(Dp) =
in.
H20
-2-
-2.
-2^
Flowmeter readings
Initial
reading
(vs,),b
ft3 or
ft3/min
o.ow
0.0 &3
6.0530
Final
reading
/2<
-(Eq.2-l),Y =
-(Eq.2-2)
-(Eq. 2-3) ,Y =
Vsl)/2]0[(tpl + tpf)/2'<
Figure 2.1A. Flowmeter calibration data form (English units).
•(Eq.2-4)
T) O CO
p p n>
oq ft o
(D (0 cr
H-
«H O
UJ C 3
§ 2!
O
u> •
o
- LO
VD
OO-
OOM
-------
Date 111 i 66 Calibrated by /4?^ Meter system no. fl.0 -/6> Primary meter no.
Barometric pressure, Pm = "ft>/ mm Hg Ambient temperature ,2-0.S" °C
Type of primary meter: wet test X. , dry gas
Type of flowmeter calibrated: rotameter X . dry gas meter
-j
, or bubble meter
, or mass flowmeter
Primary meter readings
Initial
reading
(vpi),a
m3
0
0
0
Final
reading
(Vp,).'
Jft
2.0. 13
w.lfr
30-2t>
Initial
temp,°F
(W
°C
lo.S
1O ^
1d-(j>
Final
temp,°F
°C
ZO.'Z
2.0. 5"
ZO-b
Pres
drop
(Dp)'
mm
H20
-I5f)
~/30
-/3D
Flowoeter readings
Initial
reading
(V'"
mj or
m3 /min
rt.'S'
AO
/•S'
Final
reading
(V)b
m3 or
m3 /min
£>.£
l.o
I.Z
Initial
temp
(ttl)
°C
2.0.5"
Zo.(,
1,0.1*
Final
temp
(t.r>
°C
2^.5
ZD.(a
£0.6,
Press
drop
(Ds).c
mm
H20
0
0
0
Time
min
(e).d
min
4o&
ZO.V
zo.o
Calibration
factors
(YJ,6
0.114-
O.tU
OW*
(Y)
i*
—
OWL
a Volume passing through the meter using the initial and final readings and requires a minimum of at
least five revolutions of the meter.
b Volume passing through the meter using the initial and final readings or the indicated flow rate
using the initial and final flow rate setting.
c Pressure drop through the meter used to calculate the meter pressure.
d The time it takes to complete the calibration run.
e With Y defined as the average ratio of volumes for the primary meter compared to the flowmeter
calibrated, Yt = Y ^ 0.03Y for the calibration and Yt = Y + 0.05Y for the posttest checks; thus.
For calibration of the dry gas meter:
Y, =
*.(Dp/13.6)]
tf)/2 * 2?3°K][Pn
(Eq. 2-5), Y =
(Eq. 2-6)
pf
For calibration of the rotameter and mass flowmeter:
" 273°K][PB + (Dp/13.6)]
[u o en
(B p 0)
cq rt- r>
0> O ct
H-
t-i O
-P-C 3
O
OJ •
O
VD ON
00-
00 INJ
O
-------
Date l(l
^\
Time
min
(O)/
min
ZO
-zo
ZO
Calculated
flow rate
CQ(std,]e
ft3 /min
O.O'bVb
O.G-B&C,
O.Ottio
Calibration
factor6
(K'J
^.02%
0- OVU,
O.bZQb
(K1)
1 __
O.OZf}(*
a Volume passing through the meter using the initial and final readings and requires a minimum of at
least five revolutions of the meter.
b Volume passing through the orifice using the initial and final readings or the indicated flow rate
using the initial and final flow rate setting (for variable setting orifice only).
c Pressure drop through the meter used to calculate the meter pressure.
d The time it takes to complete the calibration run.
e With K1 defined as the average orifice calibration factor based on the volumes of the primary test
meter, K\ = K' +_ 0.03K' for the calibration and K'A = K' ^ 0.05K' for the posttest checks: thus,
Flow rate of the primary meter at standard conditions:
Vp
17.71 (Vpf - Vpi)(Pm
D/13.6)
(std)
(Eq. 2-9), Q(8td) =
Vp
(std)
C(tpi + tpf)/2 + 460°F]
For determination of the K1 for the critical orifice:
0
(Eq. 2-10)
(Eq. 2-11), & K' =
K'2 -i- K'3
(Eq. 2-12)
Figure 2.2A. Critical orifice calibration data form (English units).
t? a w
JO p (D
W cr o
(D CO rt
Ul
CD 2!
O
CO •
O
« LO
VO ON
O3 •
CD N)
-------
Date /////&& Calibrated by
Barometric pressure, P_ = ~/(fl
Meter system no. CO-(Z- Primary meter no.
nun Hg Anbient temperature ^J&.<£' °C
Type of primary meter: wet test
X- , dry gas
Type of critical orifice: capillary glass X « needle or tubing
, or bubble meter
, or adjustable
Primary meter readings
Initial
reading
(vpi>>a
L
0
0
o
Final
reading
(vpfKa
L
2.Z-/2-
ZZ--I3
2-Z-./2,
Initial
temp,°F
Pres
drop
<°P>
mm
H20
-/3o
-/3o
-730
Critical orifice readings
Initial
setting
b
L or
L/nin
flTL-ftJL
fined
fi-tefL
Final
setting
b
L or
L/min
/V//4
X/A
tflA
Press
drop
c
mm
Hg
4-ftD
57*
£30
Time
min
(e),d
min
2.0
•ZA
20
Calculated
flow rate
CQ(std,]e
L/min
/.0<7Z-
/.0?3
/.^>
O
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.2
Date June 30, 1988
Page 7
1. The leak check is not conducted because a leak may have been corrected
that was present during testing.
2. Three or more revolutions of the dry gas meter may be used.
3. Only two runs need be conducted at the average flow rate during the test.
4. Record the calibration check data on the appropriate posttest calibration
check data form, Figure 2.2A (English units) or Figure 2.2B (metric
units).
5. If the posttest Y or K' factor agrees within 5% of the pretest factor, the
flow meter is acceptable. If the factor does not agree due to a leak,
correct the leak and recalibrate the flow rate device. The reported
results should then be calculated using both the factor obtained with the
leak and the factor obtained without the leak. If the flowmeter does not
pass the calibration check, the metering system must be recalibrated as
described above for the initial calibration. Either calculate the
emission results for the test report using both factors or consult with
the Administrator.
2.1.4 Personnel Sampling Pump - Personnel sampling pumps are used to collect
samples using adsorption tubes. They should be calibrated before and after the
field trip using a soap bubble meter as follows:
1. Set up the calibration apparatus as shown in Figure 2.3.
2. Check the pump battery with a voltmeter to assure adequate voltage;
charge, if necessary.
3. Turn the pump • on and moisten the inner surface of the soap bubble meter
with soap solution; draw bubbles upward until they travel the entire
length of the bubble meter without breaking.
4. Adjust the pump to desired nominal flow rate. Check the manometer; the
pressure drop should not exceed 25mm Hg (13 in.) water.
5. Start a soap bubble and measure the time with a stopwatch that it takes to
traverse at least 500 ml. Repeat at least twice more. Average the results
and calculate the flow rate by dividing the calibration volume by the
average time.
6. Record the following data:
a. volume measured
b. elapsed time
c. pressure drop
d. air temperature
e. atmospheric pressure
f. serial number and model of the pump
g. date and name of operator
7. If the pump used for sample collection uses a rotameter, the calibrated
flow rate must be adjusted for the ambient pressure and temperature during
sampling:
V.
= Q
Equation 2-17
where
V =
Q =
Q =
Pc =
P. =
Corrected sample volume, liters.
Indicated flow rate, liters/min,
Sampling time, min,
Pressure during calibration, mm Hg,
Pressure during sampling, mm Hg,
-------
Tubing
Soap
Bubble
Meter
(1-Liter)
Beaker
Containing
Soap
Solution
Personnel
Sampling
Pump
w
tO
•X) 0 CO
P CD
ft o
(B ft
H-
e-i O
C 3
CD Z
O
(jo •
O
O
Figure 2.3- Personnel punp calibration apparatus.
O
MD ON
00 •
co ru
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.2
Date June 30, 1988
Page 9
Tc =
T. =
Temperature during calibration, °K, and
Temperature of sample gas, °K.
2.2 Dilution System
2.2.1 Dynamic Dilution System - A dynamic dilution system may be required for (1)
preparation of low concentration standards from high concentration standards or (2)
for measuring high concentrations of organic emissions. The dynamic dilution
system must be initially calibrated in the laboratory and then checked during each
use. To prepare the diluted calibration samples, calibrated rotameters are
normally used to meter both the high concentration calibration gas and the diluent
gas. Other types of flowmeters and commercially available dilution systems can
also be used provided they meet the performance criteria described below.
The following steps should be used to conduct the laboratory calibration of
the dynamic dilution system:
1. Assemble the dilution system (see Figure 2.4) as a unit using a calibrated
rotameter or mass flow meter for the calibration or stack gas in combina-
tion with a calibrated rotameter, mass flowmeter or dry gas meter for the
diluent gas. It is recommended for dilutions up to 20 to 1 that a single
dilution system be used. For dilutions greater than 20 to 1, a double
dilution system should be used. It is also recommended that the system be
assembled as a unit and not be disassembled between uses. The rotameters
should be calibrated for the range in which they will be used following
the calibration procedures described above.
2. Leak check the system by plugging the inlet line to both rotameters,
placing the dilution system discharge line in a container of water, and
turning on the sample pump. The system is leakless if no bubbles are
released from the discharge line.
3. The dilution system can be calibrated over the range that it will be used,
however, if the exact dilution to be used is known, it is better to
conduct a triple calibration at the desired dilution setting. Attach the
dilution system to the diluent and calibration gases. Set the flowmeters
to the desired rate and fill the bag with sufficient gas for GC analysis.
Be careful not to overfill the bag and cause the bag to apply additional
pressure on the dilution system. Record the flow rates of both flowmet-
ers , and the laboratory temperature and atmospheric pressure on the
dynamic dilution calibration form, Figure 2.5 or an equivalent form.
4. Analyze the diluted calibration gas and a calibration gas that is in the
same range as the diluted gas. The two gases must agree within 10% for
the calibration point to be acceptable. Repeat the calibration runs until
acceptable results are obtained at all desired settings.
2.2.2 Static Dilution System - The static dilution system can be used for (1) the
bag sampling technique and (2) for preparation of low concentration calibration
gases from high concentration cylinder gases. The dilution method for the bag
sampling technique is used to reduce the concentration of organics or water vapor
in a gas sample below the condensation point or for safe handling, below the lower
explosive limit. Static dilution involves filling a bag with a diluent gas using a
calibrated dry gas meter or mass flowmeter and using a syringe or a rotameter to
add the calibration gas or a sample of stack gases to make a lower concentration
calibration or sample gas.
The following steps should be used to calibrate a static dilution system in
the laboratory before use:
-------
Vont to Charcoal Adsorbers
A A A
Heated Lino
from Proba
Quick
Connect
Ftowmetors
(On Outskia
of Box)
Chock Valvo
Quick Connects
for Calibration
Heated Box at 120* C or Sourco Tomporaturo
tj a w
B p (0
W ft O
O (6 ct
H-
«-i O
To Hoslod GC Sampling Valvo ^ *
- u>
Figure 2.4. Schenatic of heated box required for dilution of samples.
VO O\
co»
CO t\J
O
O
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.2
Date June 30, 1988
Page 11
Date ->YH/6b
Source flowmeter number P - J
Stage 1 flowmeter number G""(^«
Stage 2 flowmeter number * ////4
Barometric press /£»/ on (in.) Hg
Organic compound PcvcMorogilujLtHJu
Certified concentration 22yc> ppmv(X)
Calibrated by "7-ZX Gooctri'cl^
Date source meter calibrated // 2.0/88
Date stage 1 meter calibrated /
Date stage 2 meter calibrated
Heated box temperature iJuO
Leak check for total system C
Date of calibration curve 2-l\
/ 28/86
fJ/A
°C (°F
>£.
1/6&
„ .. , f f
STAGE 1
Emission gas flowmeter reading, ml/min
Diluent gas flowmeter reading, ml/min (
Dilution ratio
Injection time, 24h
Distance to peak, cm
Chart speed, cm/min
Retention time, min
Attenuation factor
Peak area or units
Peak area X attenuation factor
Measured concentration ,a ppmv
Calculated concentration,11 ppmv (Cs )
Percent difference,0 %
STAGE 2 (if applicable)
Emission gas flowmeter reading, ' ml/min
Diluent gas flowmeter reading, ml/min (
Dilution ratio
Injection time, 2kh
Distance to peak, cm
Chart speed, cm/min
Retention time, min
Attenuation factor
Peak area or units
Peak area X attenuation factor
Measured concentration,* ppmv
Calculated concentration,*1 ppmv
Percent difference,0 %
RUN 1 RUN 2
(qcl) Itt I^D
qdl) IODO IOOO
"?.(ff(*T- ^G>&>7-
'/03f fllT.
rf/A A//A
AJfA AJ/A
3. £3 3.$~4-
4- 4-
"50SO 2.160
/.X 'LOO II . (sf)0
3-l'l.e> ?'=l?:Z
'• 9 Aa '"} 0*0.
f—\)r> £-<3 -i
RUN 1 RUN2
(qr5) AifA- fJjA
g43) \ ' \
/
/ /
( '
\ /
) f
' \
/
/
\
RUN 3
/00D
TT (aft ?
l\4ft
AJ/A
tfIA
3-5"6»
4-
3>COO
I2..0C&
ZSf.J
28B
L 0. 3
RUN3
A//A
\
\
/
/
/
/
(
I
"• See Figure 5-1 for calculation.
106 x (X x qc )
c Percent Difference =
= Calculated concentration for single stage
Calculated Concentration - Measured Concentration
Measured Concentration
x 100#
C = 106 x X
= Calculated cone, for two stage
Figure 2.5. Dynamic dilution data form.
-------
Section No. 3-16.2
Date June 30, 1988
Page 12
Assemble the static dilution system (see Figure 4.3) and leak check the
system by plugging inlet to the dilution system, placing the discharge
line in a container of water, and pulling a vacuum of about 1 in. of Hg.
The system is leakless if no bubbles are released from the discharge line.
If the system is not leakless, find the leak and correct it.
Calculate as the amount of diluent gas needed to obtain the desired
dilution or calibration gas concentration. Meter the desired amount of
gas into the bag. If the purpose of the static dilution is to prepare a
lower concentration of calibration gas, the calibration gas should be
added to the bag using a gas tight syringe. Record the data on the static
dilution system data form, Figure 2.6 or similar form. If the purpose of
the static dilution system is to collect a diluted stack sample, the
calculated amount of diluent gas is added to the bag and the stack gas is
metered into the bag from the stack. To calibrate this system, the
calculated amount of diluent gas should be metered into the bag and then a
calibration gas should be metered into the bag with the flowmeter that is
to be used in the field. Record the data on the static dilution system
data form. Figure 2.6 or similar data form.
Analyze the diluted calibration gas and analyze a different calibration
gas that is in the range of the diluted calibration gas. The two gases
must agree within 10# of each other for the system to be acceptable.
o
o
2.3 Thermometer
The thermometers(s) on the metering systems and the sample probes and lines
should be initially compared with a mercury-in-glass thermometer that meets ASTM E-
1 No. 63C or 63F specifications:
1. Place the thermometer to be calibrated and the mercury-in-glass thermo-
meter in a bath of boiling water. Compare the readings after the bath
stabilizes and then record on the calibration data form. Figure 2.7 or
equivalent.
2. Allow both thermometers to come to room temperature. Compare the readings
after the thermometers stabilize.
3. The thermometer is acceptable if the values agree within 3°C (5.4°F) at
both points.
4. Prior to each field trip, compare the temperature reading of the mercury-
in-glass thermometer at room temperature with that of the thermometer that
is part of the metering system. If the values are not within 6°C (10.8°F)
of each other, replace or recalibrate the meter thermometer.
2.4 Barometer
The field barometer should be adjusted initially and before each test series
to agree within 2.54 mm (-0.1 in.) Hg with a mercury-in-glass barometer or with the
pressure value reported from a nearby National Weather Service Station and correct-
ed for elevation. The tester should be aware that the National Weather Service
readings are normally corrected to sea level; uncorrected readings should be x—x
obtained. The correction for the elevation difference between the weather station f j
and the sampling point should be applied at a rate of -2.5 mm Hg/30 m (-0.1 in. V_y
Hg/100 ft) elevation increase, or vice versa for elevation decrease.
-------
Section No. 3.16.2
Date June 30, 1988
Page 13
Date
Source flo^metJer number
Dry gas meter number QM~ l~7
Ambient temperature
Barometric press
Organic compound
Certified concen, (X) 2.2-/Q /ppmv
mm (in.) Hg
Calibrated by
Date source meter calibrated _
Date dry gas meter calibrated
Dry gas meter calib factor (Y)
Leak check for total system
Vacuum during leak check
Date of calibration curve
///#/ 88
~
/& /*.
Initial dry gas meter reading, L (ft3)
Final dry gas meter reading, L (ft3)
Volume of diluent gas metered, L (ft3)
Gas metered X calibration factor (Y),{V2}
Flowmeter sampling rate, L/min (cfm)
Sampling time, min
Sampling rate X sample time, L (ft3),{V1)
Dilution ratio
Injection time, 24h
Distance to peak, cm
Chart speed, cm/min
Retention time, min
Attenuation factor
Peak area or units
Peak area X attenuation factor
Measured concentration," ppmv
Calculated concentration,1* ppmv, {Cs}
Percent difference,0 %
RUN 1
RUN 2
RUN
IB3.
/3 Z-
J2-/.6>/3
O.
2.0
2-0
3.04-
&.//0
2-6.6
ID
30 5P
* See Figure 5-1 for calculation.
b Calculated concentration (Cs) =
X (Vt)
Va)
ppmv
Measured concent - Calculated concent
0 Percent difference,
X 100
Measured concentration
The percent difference must be less than 10 % absolute.
Figure 2.6. Static dilution data form.
31
-------
Date
to/to
fio/M
Reference
thermometer
type
*w
*%£
Calibr
thermc
type
tS&
~fat.fiw-
CeufilJL,
1
ated
meter
use
sh*
htefar
no.
WHZ
?-z
Ambien
refer"
<#F
MT-
t temper
calibr"
•fi-P
JO'F
Measurec
ature
differ0
'w
+-!'!=
values
Boi
refer*
wr
Z/2"/r
ling wat
calibrb
3&F
*ll'f
er
differc
i-i-fi
-\'F
Calibrator's
initials
ATA1
A77V
TJ o en
£8 P (D
Oq c* O
0) (D ct
Temperature reading of the reference thermometer in °C or °F.
Temperature reading of the thermometer being calibrated in °C or °F.
Difference between the reference thermometer and the calibrated thermometer. This difference must
be less than 3°C (5.4°F) for than initial calibration and 6°C (lO.lpF) for the calibration check.
Figure 2.7- Thermometer calibration fora.
O
o
CO «
o
- UJ
U3 ON
OO •
OOI\i
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.2
Date June 30, 1988
Page 15
Table 2.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR CALIBRATION OF EQUIPMENT
Apparatus
Wet test meter
Dry gas meter,
mass flow meter,
and rotameters
Critical orifice
Dilution system
Thermometers
Barometer
Acceptance limits
Capacity of about 2
L/min and accuracy
within 12
Y£ = Y + 0.03Y at a
point greater than
the flow rate range
to be used
K'i = K ± 0.03K'
Measured value for
diluted and undi-
luted calibration
gas must agree
within 10*
Within 3°C (5.
of true value
Within 2.5 mm
{0.1 in.) Hg of
mercury-in-glass
barometer or weather
station value
Frequency and method
of measurement
Calibrate initially,
then yearly by
liquid displacement
Calibrate vs. wet,
dry, or bubble meter
upon receipt and
after each test
Calibrate vs. wet,
dry, or bubble meter
upon receipt and
after each test
Calibrate upon
receipt and prior to
each field test using
calibration gases
Calibrate initially
as a separate com-
ponent with mercury-
in-glass thermometer;
check before each
test against mercury-
in-glass thermometer
Calibrate initially
using mercury-in-
glass barometer;
check before and
after each test
Action if
requirements
are not met
Adjust until
specs are met, or
return to vendor
Repair and
then recalibrate,
or replace
Repair and
then recalibrate,
or replace
Correct problem
and rerun cali-
bration
Adjust or replace
Adjust to
agree with
certified
barometer
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 1
3.0 PRESAMPLING OPERATIONS
This section addresses two major areas of presampling operations for Method
18: (1) preparation for, performance of, and interpretation of results for the
preliminary survey and (2) preparation for the final sampling. This section de-
scribes the preliminary survey as it applies to Method 18; for additional general
information on preliminary surveys, see Section 3«0 of this Handbook. The quality
assurance activities for the preliminary survey activities and the presampling
activities for final testing are summarized in Tables 3«1 and 3«2, respectively, at
the end of this section.
3.1 Preliminary Survey Measurements
The preliminary survey measurements are needed to properly design the final
emission test sampling and analysis protocol. The primary objective of the prelim-
inary survey is to collect a preliminary survey sample for determining which sampl-
ing procedure is most appropriate and for developing the optimum analytical pro-
cedures. Using the preliminary survey sample, estimates of the source concentra-
tion are made and the major organic components in the gas stream are identified.
Also, any compounds that may interfere with the quantitation of the target anal-
yte(s) are identified and the appropriate changes in the analytical procedures are
made. Other measurements made during the preliminary survey include sampling site
dimensions and gas stream properties. The preliminary survey is also used to
obtain a description of the process being sampled, to determine sampling logistics,
and, when possible, to collect bulk process samples and use emission screening
techniques. Use the data form shown in Figure 3-1 to record the preliminary survey
information.
3.2 Preliminary Survey Preparation
This section addresses the equipment and preparatory activities needed to
conduct the preliminary survey. Figure 3.2 can serve as an equipment checklist,
packing list, and/or equipment status form for the preliminary survey.
3.2.1 Measurement of Flue Gas Properties - The apparatus that may be required to
supplement information obtained from plant personnel during the preliminary survey
concerning the moisture level, temperature, and static pressure of the source
should be prepared for the preliminary survey as follows:
Barometer - The field barometer should be compared with a mercury-in-glass
barometer or with a National Weather Service Station (see Subsection 2.4) reading
prior to each field test.
Net Bulb/Dry Bulb Thermometers - It is recommended that for sources with stack
temperatures at or below 59° C, wet bulb/dry bulb thermometers be used to determine
stack gas moisture content. The thermometers should be compared with a mercury-in-
glass thermometer at room temperature prior to each field trip. The wet bulb/dry
bulb measurement may also be used, with the prior approval of the Administrator, to
determine stack gas moisture for sources where the stack temperature exceeds 59° C.
Method 4 Equipment - For sources with stack temperatures above 59°C, Method 4
equipment is recommended to determine stack gas moisture content. Prepare the
. . /"/ ••? ('' )
'
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 2
I. Name of company Date_
Address
Contacts Phone
Process to be sampled
Duct or vent to be sampled
II. Process description
Raw material
Products
Operating cycle
Check: Batch Continuous Cyclic_
Timing of batch or cycle
Best time to test
III. Sampling site
A. Description
Site description
o
Duct shape and size
Material
Wall thickness inches
Upstream distance inches _diameter
Downstream distance inches diameter
Size of port
Size of access area
Hazards Ambient temp_
B. Properties of gas stream
Temperature °C °F, Data source_
Velocity_ , Data source_
Static pressure inches H20, Data source_
Moisture content %, Data source
Particulate content , Data source
Gaseous components
N2 % Hydrocarbons (ppm) Toxics/Acids (ppm)
02 % H2S
CO % HC1 __
C02 % HF _
S02 % Other
Figure 3-1- Preliminary survey data sheet.
(Continued)
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 3
Figure 3.1 (Continued)
Hydrocarbon components
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
C. Sampling considerations
Location to set up GC
Special hazards to be considered_
Power available at duct_
Power available for GC
Plant safety requirements
Vehicle traffic rules
Plant entry requirements
Security agreements_
Potential problems
Safety equipment (glasses, hard hats, shoes, etc.)
D. Site diagrams. (Attach additional sheets if required).
IV. On-site collection of preliminary survey samples
A. Evacuated flasks
Flasks have been cleaned, heated in furnace and purged
with nitrogen?
B.
(Continued)
Flask evacuated to the capacity of pump?
Filter end of probe placed at center of stack, probe
purged and sampled collected into flask until flask is at
stack pressure?
Stopcocks closed and taped?
Duct temperature and pressure recorded?
Purged flasks
Flasks cleaned and purged with nitrogen?
Filter end of probe placed into stack, sample purged for
2 to 5 min and then stopcocks closed?
Stopcocks taped to prevent leakage?
Duct temperature and pressure recorded?
Stability and adsorption checks conducted?^
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June '30, 1988
Page 4
o
Figure 3^1 (Continued)
C. Flexible bags
Bags have been blanked checked and leak checked?_
Sampling system leak checked?
Filter end of probe placed into center of stack and sample
obtained at a proportional rate for appropriate amount of
time?
f>uct temperature, barometric pressure, ambient temperature,
flow rate, static pressure, and initial and final sampling
time recorded?
Analysis performed within 2 hr?
Stability and adsorption checks conducted?
D. Adsorption tubes
Proper adsorption tube(s) selected based on the likely
analytes?
Probe or adsorption tube placed into center of stack and
sample obtained at a constant rate with a calibrated
system for appropriate time based on the expected concen-
trations of analytes?
Total sample time and sample flow rate (or the number of
pump strokes), the barometric pressure, and ambient
temperature recorded?
O
Water vapor was less than 2% or measures were taken to
protect or increase the adsorption capacity of the
adsorption tube(s)?
E. Quality assurance performance audit samples
Quality assurance audit samples collected in the same
manner as the emission samples?
F. Bulk samples and screening techniques
Bulk emission sample(s) collected?
Bulk liquid sample(s) collected?
Detector tubes or other screening techniques used?
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 5
Apparatus check
Moisture Determination
W Bulb/D Bulb
Checked
Barometer
Calibrated*
Method 4
Probe, heated &
leak checked
Imptngers
Meter system
calibrated*
Velocity Determination
Pitot Tube
Number
Length
Pressure Gauge
Manometer
Other
Stack Thermometer
Calibrated
Evacuated Flask
Evacuated Flasks
Number
Cleaned
Oven heated
N2 purged
Probes
Number
Cleaned
Glass wool
Suction bulb
Pump
Purged Flask
Flask
Number
Cleaned
Oven heated
N2 purged
Acceptable
Yes
No
Quantity
Required
Ready
Yes
No
Loaded and Packed
Yes
No
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
Figure 3-2. Preliminary survey preparations.
(Continued)
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 6
o
Figure 3.2 (Continued)
Apparatus check
Purged Flask (continued)
Probe
Number
deemed
Glass wool
Vacuum Source
Pump
Squeeze bulb
Bag Sampling
Probe Liner
S steel
Glass
Teflon tube
Length
Meter System
Flowmeter*
Pump
Evacuated can
Charcoal tube
Sample line
Tedlar Bags
Number
Blank checked
Leak checked*
Heated Box
Number
Heat checked
Adsorption Tube
Probe
Heated
Checked
Nonheated
Glass
S steel
Filter
Sample Line
Type
Length
Checked*
Acceptable
Yes
No
Quantity
Required
Ready
Yes
No
Loaded and Packed
Yes
No
O
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
(Continued)
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 7
Figure 3.2 (Continued)
Apparatus check
Adsorption Tube (continued)
Pump and Meters
Pump
Orifice
Calibrated*
Rotameter
Calibrated*
Timer
Adsorption Tubes
Tw>e
Bulk Samples
20-ml Jars .
Cleaned
Acceptable
Yes
No
Quantity
Required
Ready
Yes
No
Loaded and Packed
Yes
No
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 8 /""X
equipment for sampling following the procedures described in Section 3'3-3 of this ^—
Handbook. Method 4 equipment may also be used to determine the stack gas moisture
for sources where the stack temperature is at or below 59°C.
S-Type Pttot Tube and Differential Pressure Gauge - Prepare the S-type pitot
tube and the differential pressure gauge for sampling following the procedures de-
scribed in Section 3'1«3 of this Handbook.
3.2.2 Glass Flask Sampling - The apparatus and reagents required for the collec-
tion of preliminary survey samples using glass sampling flasks are prepared as
described below. Alternative equipment found suitable may be used subject to the
approval of the Administrator.
Probe - If a heated probe is to be used for sampling, then the probe's heating
system should be checked to see that it is operating properly. The probe should be
cleaned internally by brushing first with tap water, then with deionized distilled
water, and finally with acetone. Allow the probe to air dry. The probe should be
sealed at the inlet end and checked for leaks by applying a vacuum of 380 mm (15
in.) Hg. See Subsection 1.0 for leak check procedure. The probe is considered
leak free under these conditions if no loss of vacuum is seen after one minute.
Any leaks detected should be corrected or the probe should be rejected. If the
probe has an external sheath, the integrity of the seal between the sheath and the
probe liner should be checked to ensure ambient air does not dilute the gas sample.
Teflon Tubing - Prepare sections of tubing for connections between the probe
and each flask (or bag or tube) that constitutes a preliminary survey sample col-
lection device. Clean the tubing using the procedure described above for the
probe.
Quick Connects - The quick connects should be new or cleaned according to the
manufacturer's recommendations. Leak check the quick connects as described in
Subsection 1.0.
Glass Sampling Flasks - Prepare the glass sampling flasks for collecting
preliminary survey samples as follows: Remove the stopcocks from both ends of the
flasks, and wipe the parts to remove any grease. Clean the stopcocks, barrels, and
receivers with chloroform. Clean all glass parts with a soap solution, then rinse
with tap water followed by deionized distilled water. Place the flasks in a cool
glass annealing furnace and heat the furnace to 550°C. Maintain the flasks in the
oven at this temperature for one hour. After one hour, shut off and open the
furnace to allow the flasks to cool. Return the Teflon stopcocks to the glass
flasks (if glass stopcocks are used, apply a light coating of vacuum grease to the
stopcocks before returning to the flasks.) With both stopcocks open, purge each
assembled flask with high purity nitrogen for 2 to 5 minutes. Close off the outlet
stopcock followed by the inlet stopcock to maintain a slight positive nitrogen
pressure in the flask. Secure the stopcocks with tape to prevent them from opening
accidentally.
High-Vacuum Pump - A high-vacuum pump will be required for preliminary survey
sample collection using the evacuated flask procedure. Check the operation of the
pump prior to going to the field as follows: Check for minimum pump vacuum of 75
mm (3 in.) Hg absolute by attaching a Hg-filled U-tube manometer to the pump inlet
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 9
and turning on the pump. If the minimum vacuum cannot be reached, then repair or
replace the pump.
Rubber Suction Bulb - A rubber suction bulb will be required for preliminary
survey sample collection using the purged flask procedure. The rubber suction bulb
should be checked for proper operation prior to going to the field as follows:
Attach the bulb to a water manometer, or equivalent, and squeeze the bulb until a
vacuum of at least 250 mm (10 in.) H20 is reached. Repair or replace the squeeze
bulb if sufficient vacuum cannot be developed.
3.2.3 Flexible. Bag Procedure - A flexible bag of Tedlar or aluminized Mylar can be
used to collect preliminary survey samples. If it is anticipated that Tedlar bags
will be selected as the final sampling method, then it is recommended that the
preliminary survey sample be collected using a Tedlar bag. In addition to the
apparatus described in Subsection 3.2.2 for the glass flasks (with the exception of
the flasks and the high-vacuum pump) the apparatus listed below will be required
and should be prepared as follows:
Tedlar or Aluminized Mylar Bags - Prepare new bags for preliminary survey
sampling by leak checking the bags before going to the field. The bags should also
be checked for contamination by filling with hydrocarbon-free air or nitrogen
during the leak check. The bags are checked as follows: Connect a water manome-
ter, or equivalent, using a tee connector, between the check valve quick connect on
the bag and a pressure source (or hydrocarbon-free air or nitrogen for conducting
the contamination check). Pressurize the bag to 5 to 10 cm (2 to 4 in.) H20. Loss
of pressure over a 30-second period indicates a leak. Alternatively, leave the bag
pressurized overnight: a deflated bag the following day is indicative of a leak.
Reject or repair any bags with leaks. After the hydrocarbon-free air or nitrogen
has remained in the bag for 24 hours, analyze the bag contents using a GC with a
flame ionization detector on the most sensitive setting. The bag should be re-
jected if any organic compounds are detected. If any organic compounds are
detected, the bags may be used if they are not the compounds to be sampled and
analyzed.
Rigid Leak-Proof Containers - Rigid containers can be used with the bags for
collecting preliminary survey samples. The rigid containers used to contain the
Tedlar bags during sampling should be checked• for leaks prior to going to the
field. The container should be leak checked with the bag in place as follows:
Using a tee connector, connect a water manometer or equivalent, between a pressure
source and the container outlet. Pressurize the container to 5 to 10 cm (2 to 4
in.) Hg. Any loss of pressure after 30 seconds indicates a leak. Reject or repair
the rigid container if a leak is indicated.
Direct Pump Sampling System - A direct pump sampling system can be used in
place of the rigid containers for collecting preliminary survey samples. If this
method is selected, then the system should be assembled and leak checked prior to
going to the field as follows: Assemble the system (see Figure 4.5). Bypass the
Tedlar bag and its protective container by attaching the vacuum line directly after
the rotameter using the quick connects on the sample and vacuum lines. Plug the
probe inlet and turn on the vacuum pump. If the system is leak free, the
rotameter should eventually indicate no flow. Alternatively, the sample line that
is attached to the sample bag can be placed in water. If bubbling stops, then the
system is leak free.
-------
Section No. 3-16.3
Date June 30. 1988
Page 10
Needle Valve and Eotameter - Prior to each field trip or at any sign of er-
ratic behavior, the flow control valve and the rotameter should be cleaned accor-
ding to the maintenance procedure recommended by the manufacturer.
3.2.4 Adsorption Tube Sampling - The adsorption tube sampling procedure can also
be used to collect the preliminary survey sample. If it is anticipated that ad-
sorption tubes will be selected as the final sampling method, then it is recom-
mended that the preliminary survey samples be collected using tubes containing each
potential type of adsorbent. In addition to the apparatus described in Section
3.2.1 for the glass flasks (with the exception of the flasks and a high-vacuum
pump) the apparatus listed below will be required and should be prepared as fol-
lows:
Adsorption Tubes - Check to see that the proper type of tube has been obtained
for collecting the target organic compounds. Refer to Table B in the Methods High-
lights Section to determine the proper adsorption material. Check to see that the
supply of adsorption tubes is sufficient to conduct the emission test, including
field blanks and desorption efficiency determinations.
Personnel Sampling Pump - A personnel sampling pump is used to collect the
adsorption tube samples. The pump should be calibrated following the procedures
described in Subsection 2.1.4.
Extraction Solvents - An extraction solvent will be required to prepare the
preliminary survey adsorption tube sample(s) for analysis. Refer to Table B in the
Methods Highlights Section to determine the proper extraction solvent.
3.3 Preliminary Survey Sample Collection
The preliminary survey sample collection includes flue gas or duct moisture
and velocity determinations in addition to collection of actual flue gas or duct
samples.
3.3-1 Preliminary Survey Moisture Determination - If the moisture content of the
flue gas in the duct to be tested cannot be obtained from the plant personnel, it
is determined using either wet bulb/dry bulb thermometers or Method 4 sampling
apparatus, depending on the flue gas temperature. If the flue gas temperature
cannot be obtained from plant personnel, then determine the flue gas temperature
using a calibrated thermocouple, thermometer, or equivalent temperature measuring
device.
Net Bulb/Dry Bulb Procedure - For flue gas streams at or below 59° C, the
moisture content of the flue gas should be determined using wet bulb/dry bulb
thermometers and the partial pressure equation shown below. Obtain the wet
bulb/dry bulb temperatures as follows:
1. Moisten the wet bulb thermometer wick with deionized distilled water.
2. Insert the thermometers into the flue gas stream and monitor the wet bulb
temperature.
3. When the wet bulb temperature has stabilized, record both the wet bulb and
dry bulb thermometer temperatures.
4. Calculate the flue gas moisture content using the equations below.
o
o
-------
(t
-(31AA/(Tw*390.86)
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 11
Equation 3-1
w2 =
%U20 = w2 - (0.00036? x (Td-Tw) x (l+(Tw-32)/1571)) x 100
where
Equation 3-2
w =
P. =
Calculated constant, saturation % H20 at Tw
Wet bulb temperature, °F,
Dry bulb temperature, °F,
Barometric pressure, in. Hg, and
Static pressure of duct, in.
H20.
Method 4 Moisture Procedure - Follow the procedure for Method
Section 3-3 of this Handbook.
described in
Method 2 Velocity Procedure - Follow the procedure for Method 2 described in
Section 3-1 of this Handbook to determine the flue gas or duct velocity at the
sampling point. If the velocity varies by more than 10% during the projected
sample run time, then proportional sampling will be required as described in Sub-
section 4.0. Because of the small size of some ducts, Methods 2A, 2C, or 2D may
have to be used. Follow the criteria and procedures described in the applicable
method.
3.3.2 Collection of Samples with Glass Sampling Flasks - Using the precleaned
glass sampling flasks, preliminary survey samples are collected using the evacuated
flask procedure or the purged flask procedure.
Evacuated Flask Procedure - Collect preliminary survey samples using the
evacuated flask procedure as follows:
1. Using a high-vacuum pump which is connected to one stopcock while the
other stopcock remains closed, evacuate each precleaned flask to the
capacity of the pump. A mercury manometer can be connected between the
pump and the flask using a tee connector to indicate when the maximum
vacuum is achieved. At this point, record the vacuum, and close off the
stopcock leading to the pump.
2. Remove the tubing leading to the pump and attach a glass tee (6-mm out-
side diameter, or equivalent) to the flask inlet with a short piece of
Teflon tubing.
3. Connect the end of the sampling probe to the glass tee using a short
length of Teflon tubing. The tubing must be of sufficient length to
reach the sampling point at the centroid of or no closer than 1 meter to
the duct wall.
4. Connect the rubber suction bulb to the third leg of the tee with a piece
of Teflon tubing or suitable flexible tubing.
5. Place a plug of glass wool in the probe inlet, enlarged to approximately
12-mm outside diameter, to serve as a filter to remove particulate mat-
ter.
6. Place the inlet (filtered) end of the probe at the sampling point and
purge the probe and sample line by repeatedly squeezing the rubber suc-
tion bulb until at least 7 air changes of the probe and sample line have
occurred.
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
: Page 12
7. After the probe and the sample line are completely purged, leave the
squeeze bulb in place, and open the inlet stopcock of the sampling flask
8. Leave the inlet stopcock open until the pressure in the sampling flask.
reaches the duct pressure. This should take about 15 seconds. Close the
inlet stopcock.
9. Remove the probe from the duct and disconnect the glass tee from the
flask.
10. Taps the stopcocks closed and label the flask with the plant name, date,
and sampling location, time, and sampling personnel.
11. Immediately after sampling, determine the flue gas temperature with a
calibrated thermocouple, thermometer, or equivalent temperature measuring
device, and determine the static pressure of the duct and the velocity
over a period of time equal to the predicted sample run time following
the procedures described in Section 3-1 *n this Handbook.
Purged Flask Procedure - Collect preliminary survey samples using the purged
flask procedure as follows: ,
1. Connect the small end of the sampling probe, of sufficient length to
reach the centroid of the duct to be sampled, to the inlet stopcock of a
precleaned glass sampling flask a sufficient length of Teflon tubing.
2. Connect the rubber suction bulb to the other stopcock with a piece of
Teflon tubing or suitable flexible tubing.
3. Place a plug of glass wool in the probe inlet, enlarged to approximately
12-mm OD, to serve as a filter to remove particulate matter.
4. Place the inlet (filtered) end of the probe at the centroid of or no
closer than 1 meter to the duct wall.
5- Purge the probe, sample line, and sample flask by repeatedly squeezing
the rubber suction bulb until approximately 7 air changes of the system
have occurred.
6. After the probe, sample line, and flask are completely purged, close off
the stopcock near the suction bulb, and then close off the stopcock con-
nected to the probe.
7. Remove the probe from the duct, and disconnect both the probe and the
suction bulb from the flask.
8. Tape the stopcocks closed and label the flask with the plant name, date,
and sampling location, time, and sampling personnel.
9. Immediately after sampling, determine the flue gas temperature with a
calibrated thermocouple, thermometer, or equivalent temperature measuring
device, and determine the static pressure of the duct and the velocity
over a period of time equal to the predicted sample run time following
the procedures described in Section 3*1 in this Handbook.
3.3-3 Flexible Bag Procedure - The flexible bags used to collect preliminary
survey samples must be leak checked and demonstrated to be free of contamination
following the procedure described in Subsection 3-2.2. The preliminary survey
sample collection using flexible bags can be conducted at a constant rate following
the procedure described in Subsection 4.3 for the evacuated container sampling
procedure, the direct pump sampling procedure, or, in explosive areas, the explo-
sion risk area sampling procedure. The flue gas or duct velocity and other
process parameters should be determined for designing the final sampling proced-
ures.
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 13
3-3-4 Adsorption Tube Procedure - The adsorption tubes used to collect the pre-
liminary survey sample(s) should contain the adsorbent specified in Table B of the
Method Highlights Section for the target analyte(s). The sampling time or total
sample volume for the adsorption tube should be calculated based on expected con-
centration (s) of the volatile organic(s) present and the recommended capacity of
the adsorption media. Refer to the appropriate reference given in Table B to
determine the recommended sample volume taking into consideration the amount of
adsorbent to be used. For compounds not referenced in Table B, use a reference for
a compound with similar chemical characteristics. If the target analytes require
different adsorption media, then it is recommended that preliminary survey samples
be collected using each type of adsorbent. In the case where the compound is
unlike any other documented compounds, use two adsorption tubes connected in ser-
ies. Once a recommended volume is established, it is recommended that two
additional samples be collected with sample volumes one half and twice the
recommended volume. The procedure for collecting preliminary survey adsorption
tube samples is as follows:
1. Open the adsorption tube, and connect the primary tube section (large
section of adsorbent) to the sampling probe using a minimum length of
Teflon tubing or other nonreactive tubing.
2. Connect the outlet (backup section) of the tube to the next tube in
series, if additional adsorption capacity is required.
3. Connect the outlet of the last tube to the inlet of the calibrated per-
sonnel sampling pump using a sufficient length of tubing.
4. Insert the probe into the stack or duct and turn on the pump. Maintain
the adsorption tubes in a vertical position during sampling to prevent
channeling. Sample the gas stream for the time required to obtain the
optimal volume determined from the referenced method.
5. Immediately after sampling is completed, disconnect the tubes from the
tubing and seal the tube ends with teflon tape and plastic caps. Label
the tubes and store each tube in a screw cap culture tube or similar
container to protect them during shipment.
6. Record the total sampling time, the sample flow rate, the barometric
pressure, and the ambient temperature.
3-4 Preliminary Survey Sample Analysis and Interpretation
With the exception of the analysis of the glass sampling flasks, the analysis
of preliminary survey samples should follow the procedures described in Subsection
5-0. The analysis of the glass sampling flasks are described below (see Subsection
3-4.2). The analysis of preliminary survey samples is used to optimize the
analytical procedures and select the most appropriate sampling technique for final
sampling. Using Table C the Method Highlights Section, choose appropriate GC
detector(s). Based on the sampling technique(s) used to collect the preliminary
sample, choose a GC column from the selections listed in Table D of the Method
Highlights Section; the technical service department of column manufacturers or
plant laboratory personnel may also be consulted for additional suggestions on
column type(s). For glass flask samples and Tedlar or Mylar bag samples, use
calibration gas cylinders or calibration standards prepared in Tedlar bags. For
adsorption tube samples, prepare the calibration standards directly in the
desorption liquid(s) or on adsorption tube material(s) used to collect the samples.
3.4.1 Calibration Standards for Preliminary Survey Samples - Prepare a minimum of
three calibration standards for each compound of interest. The standards should
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 14
cover a linear range for the particular GO detector, with the lowest standard and
the highest standard bracketing and a midrange standard approximating the expected
sample concentration. To estimate the sample concentration, prepare a preliminary
survey sample and perform a single analysis of the sample following the procedure
in the appropriate subsections below. During this sample analysis, determine if
adequate resolution has been achieved for each peak with a peak area greater than
5# of the total chromatographic peak area (excluding the desorption solvent peak)
using one of the procedures described in Subsection 3-4.1. Adequate resolution of
sample peaks will only be necessary in the chromatographic region(s) where the
target compound(s) are expected to elute. The GC analysis conditions and/or column
can be changed to achieve adequate resolution. The use of two different columns
may be necessary to ensure accurate identification of the gases. For analysis of
more than one target compound in very complex sample matrices, more than one
analysis using different GC conditions and/or columns may be required to achieve
adequate resolution for all target compounds.
For analysis of flask samples or bag samples, (!) use cylinder gases directly
(if available) or by dilution following the procedures described in Subsection
5-1.1 and 5-1.2, respectively, or (2) prepare standards in Tedlar bags following
the procedure described in Subsection 5-1-3 for gaseous materials or the procedure
described in Subsection 5-1-4 for liquid materials. For analysis of adsorption
tube samples, prepare calibration standards following the procedure described in
Subsection 5-1-6. Data forms should be used for recording calibration standard
preparation and analysis data (see Figures 5-4, 5-6, 5-8, and 5-9) and preliminary
survey sample analysis data (see Figure 5-1)-
The gaseous calibration standards for bag samples must be injected into the GC
using a gas sampling valve equipped with a stainless steel or Teflon sample loop
following the procedures described in Subsection 5-1 appropriate for the particular
type of gaseous standard used. Liquid calibration standards for adsorption tube
analysis must be injected into a heated sample injection port following the proced-
ure described in Subsection 5-1-6. The gaseous standards for glass flask samples
can be injected into the GC using either a gas sample valve, following the
appropriate procedure in Subsection 5-1 for the particular gaseous standard used,
or a heated injection port using a gas tight syringe following the procedure
described below; the same injection procedure used for the standards must be used
for the flask samples.
The procedure for injecting gaseous calibration standards using a gas tight
syringe is as follows:
1. Attach a GC septum to a piece of Teflon tubing and attach the tubing to
the outlet of the calibration gas cylinder regulators or the Tedlar bags
containing the calibration gases.
2. Insert the needle of the syringe through the septum, and repeatedly purge
the syringe by repeatedly filling and emptying the syringe 7 times.
3. After purging the syringe, fill the syringe past the mark corresponding
to the desired amount to be injected, and withdraw the syringe from the
septum. Stick the needle into a rubber stopper or a thick septum to
prevent dilution of the standard by ambient air.
4. Immediately before injecting the standard, remove the needle from the
stopper or septum, adjust the syringe to the desired volume, and inject
the standard into the heated injection port on the GC. Note the time of
injection on the strip chart and/or actuate the electronic integrator.
5. Repeat the injection of the standard until the peak areas from consecu-
tive injections agree within 5# of their average value.
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 15
Perform initial tests using the calibration standards to determine the optimum
GC conditions to minimize analysis time while still maintaining sufficient resolu-
tion. Sufficient resolution can be determined following the procedure described by
Knoll42 or in EPA Method 625A/* where the baseline to valley height between two
adjacent peaks must be less than 25% of the sum of the two peak heights (see Figure
3-3).
Analyze the calibration standards, starting with the lowest concentrations
first. Repeat each standard analysis until two consecutive injections give indi-
vidual area counts within 5# of their average. Multiply the average of the re-
sponse for the two acceptable consecutive injections of each standard by the detec-
tor attenuation to determine the calibration area value for each standard. Record
the retention time for each compound and the calibration area for each standard.
Record the detector settings, the recorder/integrator attenuation for each
standard, the chart speed, the GC temperature settings, the column parameters (type
and length), and the carrier gas flow rate. Plot the concentration of the stan-
dards on the abscissa (x-axis) and the calibration area for each standard on the
ordinate. Perform a regression analysis, and draw the least squares line on the
plot. It is recommended, but not required for preliminary survey sample analysis,
that the validity of the calibration curve be checked using the audit procedures
described in Section 8.0. The audit sample may be analyzed at this time in lieu of
analysis during the final sample analysis with the prior approval of the
Administrator.
If positive identification of a target compound cannot be made by comparison
of the compound retention time to the retention time of one of the standards, then
use of a different type of column may be helpful. If positive identification still
cannot be achieved, then GC/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) or GC/infrared (GC/IR) tech-
niques should be used, with GC/MS recommended. In addition, any compounds, not
identified as target compounds, with peak areas greater than 5# of the total chro-
matographable peak area (excluding the solvent peak area for adsorption tubes)
should be identified by comparison to known standards or by using GC/MS.
3.4.2 Glass Flask Preliminary Sample Analysis - Since glass sampling flasks are
only used for preliminary survey samples, the analysis of the flasks is described
in this section. Glass sampling flasks require some pressurization prior to analy-
sis to withdraw the sample.
Using the ideal gas law, the amount of dilution of the sample that results
from pressurization can be estimated with enough accuracy to permit interpretation
of the preliminary survey sample results. The procedure for pressurizing a flask
is as follows:
1. Note if any condensation has collected in the flask. If it has, heat the
flask to the flue gas or duct temperature with an oven, heating tape, or
a heat lamp. Note; The pressurization of sealed glass containers by
heating is an inherently hazardous process. The use of a protective
shield to protect personnel from flying glass in the event of an
explosion is highly recommended. In addition, the flask should be
wrapped in cloth or other cushioning media during these operations.
2. Connect one end of the flask to a mercury manometer, open the stopcock,
and determine the initial pressure of the flask (Pi). Record Pi and the
initial absolute flask temperature (Tj) in °R or °K.
3. Connect the other end of the flask to a source of hydrocarbon-free nitro-
gen or air, and open the stopcock. Slowly pressurize the flask to a
maximum of 15 psig, and close the stopcock. Determine the final pressure
of the flask (Pf) and the final absolute temperature of the flask (Tx).
-------
1
w
v
Figure 3-3- Diagram showing EPA Method 625 criterion for adequate resolution of
overlapping compounds with similar mass spectra.
O
O
CD p CD
Oq rt O
CD CD ct
H-
M C_| O
cr>c 3
CD Z
O
UJ •
O
VO (T>
03-
OOUO
O
-------
Section No. 3-16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 1?
Note; The pressurization of sealed glass containers is an inherently
hazardous process. The use of a protective shield to protect personnel
from flying glass in the event of an explosion is highly recommended. In
addition, the flask should be wrapped in cloth or other cushioning media
during these operations.
Calculate the first dilution factor (Dj) using the following formula:
Di =
P x T
rf x ij
T x
i x
Equation 3-2
5- Allow the flask to equilibrate for 10 minutes. Note if any condensation
has formed. If condensation has formed in the flask and the flask did not
initially required heating, heat the flask to a temperature sufficient to
vaporize the condensate. If the condensate cannot be vaporized or if the
flask was already heated and more condensate formed during pressuriza-
tion, the sample cannot be analyzed accurately.
6. Close the stopcocks and disconnect the manometer and dilution gas.
Analyze the contents of a pressurized flask using a sample introduced into the
GC via a gas sampling valve by the following procedure:
1. Connect the sample flask to the injection valve with the valve in the
load position.
2. Open the stopcock connected to the valve, and allow the gas sample to
flow through the sample loop at 100 ml/min for 30 seconds (determined
with a rotameter connected to the outlet of the sample loop) or purge
with 5 times the sample loop volume, whichever is less. Close the stop-
cock, and allow the sample loop to return to ambient pressure.
3. Actuate the sample valve to inject the sample and record the injection
time.
4. Examine the chromatogram and determine if adequate resolution has been
achieved between individual target compound peaks and between target
compound peaks and any interfering compound peak with an area greater
than 5# of the total area of all peaks (excluding the desorption solvent
peak) using the procedure described in Subsection 3-4.1.
5. Determine the retention time for each peak by dividing the distance of
the peak maximum from the injection point by the chart speed.
6. Repeat the analysis, and determine the peak area and retention time for
each target compound identified during the second analysis. Although not
required for the preliminary survey sample analysis, the peak areas for
each target compound from consecutive injections should agree within 5%
of the average peak area. The retention times between the two injections
should agree within 0.5 seconds or 1% of the adjusted retention time
(compound retention time minus the time of elution of unretained peaks),
whichever is greater.
Analyze the contents of a pressurized flask using a sample introduced into the
GC via a gas tight syringe and a heated injection port sample by the following
procedure:
1. Attach a GC septum to one of the stopcocks on the glass flask. (Note:
Glass sampling flasks can be purchased with an integral septum porti)
2 Insert the needle of the syringe through the septum, and purge the sy-
ringe by repeatedly filling and emptying the syringe 7 times.
3. After purging the syringe, fill the syringe past the mark corresponding
to the desired amount to be injected, and withdraw the syringe from the
-------
o
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 18
septum. Stick the needle into a rubber stopper or a thick septum to
prevent dilution of the standard by ambient air.
4. Immediately before injecting the sample, remove the needle from the
stopper or septum, adjust the syringe down to the desired volume, and
inject the sample into the heated injection port on the GC. Note the
injection time on the strip chart and/or actuate the electronic integra-
tor.
5. Determine the retention time for each peak by dividing the distance of
the peak maximum from the injection point by the chart speed.
6. Repeat the analysis, and determine the retention times for each peak for
the second analysis. The retention times of successive injections should
agree within 0.5 seconds or within 1% of the mean of the adjusted
retention times, whichever is greater.
3.4.3 Analysis of Preliminary Survey Bag Samples - Follow the procedures described
in Subsection 5-3-1 for the analysis of bag samples. To assess the stability of
the gas sample in Tedlar bags, perform a second analysis after a time period equal-
ling the period between sample collection and the first analysis. If the concen-
tration of the sample collected in a Tedlar bag decreases by more than 1Q% between
the first and second analysis, then an accepted sampling method other than Tedlar
bags should be considered.
Perform a retention check on the bag sample by successively evacuating the bag
and refilling it with hydrocarbon-free air or nitrogen one or more times. Analyze -^
the bag contents for the target compound(s), allow the gas to sit in the bag f j
overnight, and reanalyze bag contents for the target compound(s). If any target V. J
compound is detected in the bag at a concentration greater than 5# of the original
concentration, then an accepted sampling method other than Tedlar bags should be
considered.
3.4.5 Analysts of Preliminary Survey Adsorption Tube Samples - Follow the proced-
ures described in Subsection 5-3-4 for the analysis of adsorption tube samples. A
minimum desorption efficiency of $0% must be obtained. If $0% desorption effici-
ency cannot be achieved using the referenced procedures from Table B in the Method
Highlights Section, then try longer desorption times, more vigorous desorption
techniques and/or other desorption solvents. If $0% desorption efficiency still
cannot be accomplished, then an accepted sampling method other than adsorption
tubes should be considered.
3.4.6 Interpretation of Preliminary Survey Eesults - To select the most suitable
sampling and analytical method for the final field test, the results of the prelim-
inary survey must be properly interpreted. The major points to consider are (1)
the sampling location, (2) the parameters of the process being tested, (3) the flue
gas moisture and temperature and the flue or duct static pressure, (4) stability of
the gas sample in bags, (5) the desorption efficiency of the target compounds from
adsorption tubes, and (6) the resolving capability, precision, accuracy, and speed
of the GC analysis. Thus, flue gas or duct parameters and components present
determine which sampling and analytical methodologies will be the most appropriate.
Sampling Location - The hazards associated with the sampling location will
influence the type of sampling methodology which can be used. In explosion risk
areas where use of pumps, heated probes, or a GC with a flame ionization detector
(FID) would be prohibited, the explosion risk area sampling procedure can be used
safely. Close attention must be paid to maintaining the proper sampling rate when
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 19
using the evacuated canister as a vacuum source. It may be possible at certain
hazardous locations, to locate the collection device {bag or adsorption tube) in
the explosion risk area near the source and operate the sampling pump a safe dis-
tance away. Also, intrinsically safe personnel sampling pumps could be used in
certain hazardous areas provided the required sampling rate can be maintained.
Hazardous sampling locations may not be suitable for direct or dilution interface
sampling when using an electrically-heated probe and sample line.
Other physical factors concerning the sampling location will also influence
which sampling method is most suitable. These factors will be site-specific and
are beyond the scope of this Handbook.
Process Parameters - The particular process parameters pertaining to the
generation of the organic emissions and the effect the operation has on the
emission levels will influence which sampling technique will be most suitable. In
the case of a continuous process where emission levels are constant, each of the
Method 18 sampling techniques should be suitable with regard to the process
parameters. For processes operating in a batch or cyclic mode, the bag or adsorp-
tion tube integrated sampling techniques may be more suitable compared to the
interface techniques where grab samples are analyzed.
Flue Gas or Duct Conditions - The flue gas or duct moisture and temperature
will have a major influence on selecting the most suitable sampling technique.
High moisture will affect both bag samples and adsorption tube samples. For situa-
tions where moisture may be a problem, the interface techniques are recommended
provided the 5% criteria for consecutive injections, described in Subsections 5-3-2
and 5-3-^» can be met. Condensation in bag samples may result in the target organ-
ic compounds being absorbed into the condensate, or, at extremely high concen-
trations, being the condensate itself. The heated bag sampling technique may be
suitable provided on-site analysis is conducted when it is not practical to keep
the bags heated until analysis at the base laboratory. Condensation may also be
avoided by using a diluted bag sample collected by prefilling the bag with a known
quantity of hydrocarbon-free air or nitrogen prior to sampling and accurately
metering the gas sample into the bag during sampling.
Moisture reduces the adsorptive capacity of certain types of adsorbents (pri-
marily charcoal). . For sampling with adsorption tubes at sources with moisture
above 3%, a silica gel tube may be inserted in front of the primary adsorption
tube; otherwise, two or more adsorption tubes connected in series should be used.
The first tube becomes a sacrificial tube and should be positioned vertically
during sampling. A disadvantage of this approach is that the additional tubes will
also require analysis. Alternatively, a moisture knock-out jar can be used in
front of the adsorption tube. As varying amounts of the organic emissions will
also condense (the amount of each organic removed from the gas stream will largely
depend on the individual compound's volatility and solubility characteristics), the
liquid collected must be retained for analysis. Accurate quantitation of various
organics in the condensed liquid(s) may involve several steps and is generally
problematic.
The flue gas temperature may also dictate which sampling technique can be used
due to limitations of the sampling equipment.
Bag Sample Stability and Target Compound "Retention - If on-site analysis of
bag samples is not feasible and the samples are returned to the base laboratory for
analysis, then the stability of the gas sample in the bag will be a factor and
should be determined. While the stability of organics in bags has been demonstra-
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 20
ted in numerous laboratory evaluations, an actual source sample could contain other
unknown components which may affect sample stability. If the preliminary survey
sample analysis indicates that the gas sample is not stable, then one of the alter-
native sampling procedures should be used. The check should be conducted at an
elevated temperature if the bag is to be heated during sampling.
The retention of the target compounds by the Tedlar bag should also be check-
ed. This check will indicate any sample loss not determined by the stability
check. If the retention of a target compound by the Tedlar bag is unacceptably
high, then the bag sampling technique is not suitable for that target compound and
one of the alternative sampling procedures should be used. Heating of the bag
during sampling and analysis may reduce the retention.
Adsorption Tube Desorption Efficiency - The desorption efficiency determined
for the adsorption tubes must be >50#. If >50% desorption efficiency cannot be
achieved with the referenced procedure, then more vigorous desorption techniques
and/or solvents should be evaluated. The desorption efficiency, as determined by
the procedures described in Subsection 5-1.6, will not indicate if the gas sample
matrix will affect the desorption of the target compounds. If acceptable
desorption efficiency cannot be achieved, then one of the alternative sampling
procedures should be used. Also, the adsorption efficiency must be greater than
90#. The breakthrough volume must not be exceeded.
Calibration Standards and GC Analysts - The availability of calibration stan-
dards may dictate which sampling technique can be used. The GC analysis may also
dictate which sampling technique will be the most suitable. For accurate analysis,
adequate resolution must be achieved between target compounds and between any
interfering compounds and target compounds. During preliminary survey sample
analysis, acceptable resolution may not be achievable on a gas sample but may be
accomplished with the adsorption tube sample, or vice versa. Thus, the sampling
technique which gives acceptable resolution during sample analysis must be select-
ed. In some situations where analysis of more than one target compound is requir-
ed, two or more analyses of the same sample under different GC conditions and/or
with different columns may be necessary to achieve adequate resolution.
Acceptable accuracy, as demonstrated by audit sample analysis, must also be
achieved for sample analysis by either gas or liquid injection. Again the sampling
technique that gives acceptable accuracy during sample analysis must be selected.
The sampling technique that gives acceptable precision, as demonstrated by consecu-
tive replicate injections, must be selected. Minimizing the analysis time is par-
ticularly important for the interface techniques. As discussed above, the preci-
sion limits may be hard to achieve with the interface techniques with a long analy-
sis time under variable or cyclic emission conditions.
3-5 Apparatus Check and Calibration
Figure 3-4 summarizes the pretest apparatus checks and calibration and can be
used as a pretest operations checklist. Figure 3-5 can serve as an equipment
packing list and status report form.
3.5-1 Probe - If a heated probe is required for the selected sampling procedure,
then the probe's heating system should be checked to see that it is operating prop-
erly. The probe should be cleaned internally by brushing first with tap water,
then with deionized distilled water, and finally, with acetone. Allow the probe to
air dry, then the probe should be heated and purged with air or nitrogen. The
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3-16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 21
Date Calibrated by
Check Sampling Technique To Be Used
Direct Bag , Dilution Bag , Direct Interface , Dilution Interface ,
or Adsorption Tube .
Sampling Checks (Check only applicable methods)
Velocity and Water Vapor Content
Pitot tube dimension specifications checked? yes no (specification of Method
2, Handbook Section 3.1)
Differential pressure gauge pretest calibration acceptable? yes no N/A
(specifications of Method 2, Handbook Section 3.2)
Stack temperature sensor calibrated against a reference thermometer?* yes no
(within 5°F of reference thermometer)
Barometer pretest field barometer reading correct? yes no (within 2.5 nua
(0.1 in.) Hg of the mercury-in-glass barometer)
Wet bulb/dry bulb thermometers accuracy acceptable? yes no (within 1°F of
true value, manufacturer's specifications)
Method 4 sampling equipment acceptable?* yes no (Handbook Section 3.3, PRE
TEST SAMPLING CHECKS, Method 4, Figure 2.5)
Direct Bag
Pretest calibration of flowmeter acceptable? yes no (within 10 percent of
0.5 liter/min for single check)
For heated box system, pretest calibration of the temperature sensor in the box is
acceptable? yes no N/A (within 5 percent of reference value at
temperature of expected use)
Dilution Bag
Pretest calibration of flowmeter acceptable? yes no (within 3 percent of wet
test meter)
Pretest calibration factor of dry gas meter acceptable? yes no (within 2
percent of wet test meter)
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
(Continued)
Figure 3-4. Pretest sampling checks.
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 22
Figure 3.4 (Continued)
Direct Interface and Dilution Interface
Pretest calibration of stack temperature sensor acceptable?* yes no (within
2°F of reference value)
Pretest calibration of probe and heated sample line temperature sensor acceptable?*
yes no (within 2°F of reference value)
For dilution interface only, pretest calibration of dilution system acceptable?*
yes no (within 10 percent of expected dilution factor)
Pretest calibration of gas chromatograph acceptable?* yes no (specifications
shown in POSTSAMPLING OPERATIONS CHECKLIST, Figure 5.10)
Adsorption Tubes
Pretest calibration of limiting orifice acceptable?* yes no (compared to
bubble meter)
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
o
o
'.- \ V
I; ' '
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 23
Apparatus check
Moisture Determination
V Bulb/D Bulb
Checked
Barometer
Calibrated*
Method 4
Probe, heated &
leak checked
Impingers
Meter system
calibrated*
Velocity Determination
Pitot Tube
Number
Length
Pressure Gauge
Manometer
Other
Stack Thermometer
Calibrated
Bag Sampling
Probe Liner
S steel
Glass
Teflon tube
Length
Meter System
Flowmeter*
Pump
Evacuated can
Charcoa I tube
Sample line
Tedlar Bags
Number
Blank checked
Heated Box
Number
Heat checked
Acceptable
Yes
No
Quantity
Required
Ready
Yes
No
Loaded and Packed
Yes
No
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
Figure 3-5- Pretest preparations.
-------
Section No. 3-16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 24
Figure 3.5 (Continued)
o
Apparatus check
Bag Sampling (continued)
Dilution
Inert gas
Meter
Gas Chromatograph
On-site
(check below)
N/A
Direct or Dilution
Interface
Probe Liner
Glass
S steel
Teflon
Heated Line
Length
Heat checked
Temperature Sensors
Stack
Probe
-Calibrated*
Sample Pump
Dilution System
Dilution pumps
Flowmeters
Dilution gas
Heated box
Dilution factor
checked*
Gas Chromatograph
(shown below)
Adsorption Tube
Probe
Heated
Checked
Nonheated
Glass
S steel
Filter
Acceptable
Yes
No
Quantity
Required
Ready
Yes
No
Loaded and Packed
Yes
No
O
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 25
Figure 3.5 (Continued)
Apparatus Check
Adsorption Tube (continued)
Sample Line
Type
Length
Checked*
Pump and Meters
Pump
Orifice
Calibrated*
Eotameter
Calibrated*
Timer
Adsorption Tubes
Type
Gas Chromatograph
Cylinder Standards
Analyte
PPM
PPM
Regulators
Bags
Size
Dilution system
Calibrated*
Diluent gas
Bag Standards
Analyte
Syringes
Iwptnger/hot
plate assembly
Gas meter
N2 gas
Regulator
Bags
Size
Other Gases
Fuel
Carrier
Zero
Columns
Type
Acceptable
Yes
No
Quantity
Required
Ready
Yes
No
Loaded and Packed
Yes
No
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 26
Figure 3.5 (Continued)
Apparatus Check
Gas Chromatograph
Type
Temp /con oven
Bulk Samples
Bottles
Type
Size
Acceptable
Yes
No
Quantity
Required
Ready
Yes
No
Loaded and Packed
Yes
No
o
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
O
o
-------
Section No. 3-16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 27
probe should be sealed at the inlet end and checked for leaks by applying a vacuum
of 10 in. H20. See Subsection 1.0 for the probe leak check procedure. The probe
is considered leakfree under these conditions if no loss of vacuum is seen after
one minute. Any leaks should be corrected or the probe should be rejected. If the
probe has an external sheath, the integrity of the seal between the sheath and the
probe liner should be checked to ensure ambient air does not dilute the gas sample.
3. 5 -2 Teflon Tubing - Prepare enough sections of tubing for connecting the probe
to bag or tube samples.
3.5.3 Quick Connects or Equivalent - The quick connects, or their equivalents,
should be new or cleaned according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Leak
check the quick connects as described in Subsection 1.0.
3.5.4 Barometer - The field barometer should be compared with the mercury-in-glass
barometer or with a National Weather Service Station reading prior to each field
test.
3.5.5 Met Bulb/Dry Bulb Thermometers - For sources with stack temperatures below
59° C where wet bulb/dry bulb thermometers will be used to determine stack gas
moisture content, the thermometers should be compared with the mercury-in-glass
thermometer at room temperature prior to each field trip.
3.5.6 Method 4 Equipment - Where Method 4 will be used to determine stack gas
moisture content, prepare the equipment for sampling following the procedures
described in Section 3-3.3 of this Handbook.
3.5.7 S-type Pitot Tube and Differential Pressure Gauge - Prepare the S-type pi tot
tube and the differential pressure gauge for sampling following the procedures de-
scribed in Section 3-1.3 of this Handbook.
3.5.8 Sampling Pump - Check the sampling pump for delivery rate and leaks before
going to the field as follows: Attach a 0 to 5 liter/minute rotameter, to the
outlet of the pump and turn on the pump. Check the flow rate indicated by the
rotameter. Reject or repair the pump if the flow rate is not at least 1 liter/mi-
nute. If the flow is adequate, then conduct a leak check by plugging the inlet of
the pump. If the pump is leak free then the rotameter should eventually indicate
no flow. Repair or replace the pump if a leak is indicated.
3.5.9 Tedlar Bags - Prepare new Tedlar bags for sampling by leak checking the bags
before going to the field. The bags should also be checked for contamination by
filling with hydrocarbon- free air or nitrogen during the leak check. The bags are
checked as follows: Connect a water manometer, or equivalent, using a tee con-
nector between the check valve quick connect on the bag and a pressure source (or
hydrocarbon-free air or nitrogen for conducting the contamination check) . Pres-
surize the bag to 5 to 10 cm (2 to 4 in.) H20 and disconnect the quick connect.
Loss of pressure over a 10 minute period indicates a leak. Alternatively, leave
the bag pressurized overnight; a deflated bag the following day is indicative of a
leak. Reject or repair any bags with leaks. After the hydrocarbon- free air or
nitrogen has remained in the bag for 24 hours, analyze the bag contents using a GC
with a flame ionization detector on the most sensitive setting. The bag should be
rejected if any organic compounds are detected that may interfere with the analysis
of any of the target compound (s) .
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 28
3.5.10 Etgtd Leak-Proof Containers - The rigid containers used to contain the
Tedlar bags during sampling should be checked for leaks prior to going to the
field. The container should be leak checked with the bag in place as follows:
Connect a water manometer, or equivalent, using a tee connector between a pressure
source and the container outlet. Pressurize the container to 5 to 10 cm (2 to 4
in.) Hg. Any loss of pressure after 10 minutes indicates a leak. Reject or repair
the rigid container if a leak is indicated.
3.5-11 Direct Pump Sampling System - If the direct pump sampling system is select-
ed, then the system should be assembled and leak checked prior to going to the
field as follows: Assemble the system (see Figure 4.5). Attach a vacuum line and
a rotameter to the inlet quick connect. Plug the probe inlet and turn on the
vacuum pump. If the system is leakfree up to the pump, the rotameter should even-
tually indicate no flow. An alternate procedure to leak check the system up to the
male inlet check valve quick connect is as follows: Connect a water manometer, or
equivalent, using a tee connector between a pressure source and the inlet end of
the probe. Pressurize the system to 5 to 10 cm (2 to 4 in.) Hg. Any loss of
pressure after 30 seconds indicates a leak. Reject or repair the sampling system
if a leak is indicated. Check to see if the pump is contaminating the sampling
system by filling a second contamination-free Tedlar bag with hydrocarbon-free air
or nitrogen, and with the system assembled pull the hydrocarbon-free air or nitr-
ogen from the second Tedlar bag into the first Tedlar bag using the pump. Analyze
the first bag contents using a GC with a flame ionization detector on the most
sensitive setting. The pump should be rejected or repaired, cleaned, and checked
again if any organic compounds are detected that may interfere with the analysis of
any of the target compound(s).
3.5.12 Needle Valve and Rotameter - Prior to each field trip or at sign of erratic
behavior, the flow control valve and the rotameter should be cleaned according to
the maintenance procedure recommended by the manufacturer.
3.5-13 Teflon Probe - For bag sampling in an explosion risk area, prepare a new
Teflon probe or clean a used Teflon probe following the procedure described in
Subsection 3•5•1 - Leak check the Teflon probe as follows: Attach a mercury manome-
ter, with a tee connector, and a vacuum pump to the outlet of the probe. Plug the
inlet end of the probe and apply a vacuum of 10 in. H20. The probe is considered
leak free under these conditions if no loss of vacuum is seen after one minute.
Any leaks should be corrected or the probe should be rejected.
3-5-14 Explosion Risk Area Sampling System - The explosion risk area sampling
system should be leak checked as follows: Evacuate the steel drum. Assemble the
system (see Figure 4.6), with the pinch clamp open, the sample bag leak checked and
evacuated, and directional needle valve closed. Attach a mercury manometer to the
inlet of the Teflon probe. Open the needle valve. The rotameter should eventually
indicate no flow. Once there is no flow, note the manometer reading. The system
is considered leak free under these conditions if no loss of vacuum is seen after
one minute. Any leaks should be corrected or the system should be rejected. It is
recommended that an explosion-proof pump be used in the explosion risk area or a
regular pump be used outside the risk area. Follow the procedures described for
these pumps.
3-5-15 Heated Bag Sample Container and Sample Lines - If other modified bag sampl-
ing techniques are selected due to condensation observed during sampling, heated
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3-16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 29
bag sample containers and sample lines will be required. The heating systems of
this equipment should be checked prior to going to the field to see that they are
operating properly. The sample lines should be cleaned following the procedure
described for the sampling probe in Subsection 3-5.1. The heated sampling system
should be assembled and leak checked prior to going to the field as follows:
Assemble the system (see Figure 4.5). Attach a vacuum pump and a rotameter to the
inlet quick connect. Plug the probe inlet and turn on the vacuum pump. If the
system is leak free, the rotameter should eventually indicate no flow. An alter-
nate procedure to leak check the system up to the female outlet check valve quick
connect on the bag container is as follows: Connect a water manometer, or equiva-
lent, using a tee connector between a pressure source and the inlet end of the
probe. Pressurize the system to 5 to 10 cm (2 to 4 in.) Hg. Any loss of pressure
after 30 seconds indicates a leak. Reject or repair the sampling system if a leak
is indicated.
3.5.16 Direct Interface Sampling System - The heating system of the sampling
probe should be checked prior to going to the field if heating is required to
maintain the gas sample above the duct temperature and/or to prevent condensation.
The probe should also be cleaned and leak checked following the procedures describ-
ed in Subsection 3«5-l. If the probe has an external sheath, the integrity of the
seal between the sheath and the probe liner should be checked to ensure ambient air
does not dilute the gas sample. The sample line should be cleaned following the
procedure described for the sampling probe in Subsection 3-5.1. The heating system
of the sample line should be checked before going to the field to see that it is
operating properly. The direct interface sampling system should be assembled and
leak checked prior to going to the field as follows: Assemble the system (see
Figure 4.5). Switch the gas sampling valve to the inject position, and plug the
outlet from the sample valve. Connect a water manometer, or equivalent, using a
tee connector between a pressure source and the inlet end of the probe. Pressurize
the system to 5 to 10 cm (2 to 4 in.) Hg. Any loss of pressure after 30 seconds
indicates a leak. Reject or repair the sampling system if a leak is indicated.
3.5-17 Dilution Interface Sampling System - The equipment required for dilution
interface sampling is the same as required for direct interface sampling, with the
addition of a heated dilution system and a larger heated sample pump. The heating
systems should be checked to see that they are operating properly. Prior to each
field trip or at sign of erratic behavior, all flowmeters should be cleaned accord-
ing to the maintenance procedure recommended by the manufacturer. The flowmeters
should also be calibrated following the procedures described in Subsection 2.1-3-
The dilution interface sampling system should also be checked for leaks as follows:
Assemble the system (see Figure 4.6). Connect a water manometer, or equivalent,
using a tee connector between a pressure source and the inlet end of the probe.
Plug the three outlet vents to the charcoal adsorbers and the outlet of the two
flowmeters. Pressurize the system to 5 to 10 cm (2 to 4 in.) Hg. Any loss of
pressure after 30 seconds indicates a leak. Reject or repair the system if a leak
is indicated. It is advisable to verify the operation of the dilution system prior
to going to the field following the procedures described in Subsections 4.3-7 and
5.3.3.
3.5.18 Gas Chromatography System - Refer to Table C in the Method Highlights
Section to ensure that the proper detector has been selected for the target organic
compounds. Prior to taking the gas Chromatography system to the field, check that
all systems are operating properly. Consult the operator's manual for procedures
-------
o
Section No. 3-16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 30
to verify that the equipment is operating properly. Check to see that all cylinder
gas regulators, connections, and tubing are functioning properly and are leak free.
This is particularly important when using hydrogen and oxygen. Consult with the
regulator manufacturer for procedures on checking pressure regulators. Connections
and tubing can be checked for leaks by pressurizing with the gas and wetting with a
soap solution or other commercially available solutions. Any bubbles forming on
the connections indicate a leak. Tighten or replace any leaking connections. An
alternative leak check procedure for carrier gas is as follows: Plug the outlet of
the analytical column. Pressurize the tubing and connections. Turn off the cylin-
der valve and note pressure on the regulator gauge and, if equipped, the GC pres-
sure gauge. Any loss of pressure indicates a leak. Locate the leak using a soap
solution or work backwards through the carrier gas flow path disconnecting each
component and plugging the carrier gas flow until the leak is located, a similar
check should be made of the gas sampling valve, sample loop, and connections.
It is advisable to take to the field an adequate supply of spare parts, sep-
tums, different size sample loops, extra analytical columns, and other related
equipment that may fail or deteriorate during the emission test. The generation of
response factors for each target organic compound, relative to a single organic
compound, should be confirmed in the laboratory prior to going to the field. The
confirmation procedure involving preparation and analysis of calibration standards
containing multiple organic compounds is described in Section 5.1.6.
3.6 Reagents and Equipment
The following reagents and equipment may be required 'to conduct the emission
test depending on the sampling method selected. These materials are generally ac-
quired from commercial vendors. Certification of purity and/or analysis should be
obtained for adsorption tubes, calibration and zero gases, and liquid organic com-
pounds .
3.6.1 Charcoal Adsorber - Check to see that the supply of charcoal adsorbent is
sufficient to last for the entire field test period.
3.6.2 Adsorption Tubes - If adsorption tube sampling is to be conducted, check to
see that the proper cype of tube has been obtained for collecting the target or-
ganic compounds. Refer to Table B in the Methods Highlights Section to determine
the proper p^sorption material. Check to see that the supply of adsorption tubes
is suffi^ent to conduct the emission test, including field blanks and for desorp-
ti™ efficiency determinations.
3.6.4 GC Carrier Gas - Check the GC operator's manual and the GC column manufac-
turer to see that the GC carrier gas type and grade are compatible with the GC and
the column. Check to see that the supply of carrier gas is sufficient to last the
entire field test period.
3.6.4 Auxiliary GC Gases - Check to see if the proper type and grade of auxiliary
gases required by the GC detector have been obtained. Consult with the GC detector
manufacturer to determine the proper type and grade of auxiliary gases required.
Check to see that the supply of auxiliary gases is sufficient to last the entire
field test period. x—x
3.6.5 Calibration Gases - Check to see if the correct calibration gases in the re- V_x
quired range have been obtained. If available, commercial cylinder gases may be
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 31
used if their concentrations have been certified by direct analysis; cylinder gases
with tighter tolerances on their concentrations are preferred. Check to see that
the supply of calibration gases is sufficient to last the entire field test period.
3.6.6 Calibration Gas Dilution System - Prior to each field trip or at the sign of
erratic behavior, any flow control valves or rotameters used in the dilution system
should be cleaned according to the maintenance procedure recommended by the manu-
facturer. The rotameters or other metering devices used with a single-stage or
two-stage dilution system should be calibrated prior to going to the field follow-
,ing the procedures described in Subsection 2.2. It is advisable to check the
dilution ratio of the dilution system prior to going to the field following the
procedures described in Subsections 4.3.7 and 5-3-3-
3.6.7 Zero Gas - Check to see that the zero gas meets the requirements for being
hydrocarbon-free (less than 0.1 ppmv of organic material as propane or carbon equi-
valent) . Check to see that the supply of zero gas is sufficient to last the entire
field test period.
3.6.8 Audit Gases - Check to see that the required audit gases in the proper range
have been acquired. Consult Table A in the Method Highlights Section for audit
gases available from the EPA for the target organic compounds. The availability
and ranges of audit gases can be determined by contacting:
Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
Quality Assurance Division (MD-77B)
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Attention: Audit Cylinder Gas Coordinator
For audit gases obtained from a commercial gas manufacturer, check that the manu-
facturer has (1) certified the gas in a manner similar to the procedure described
in 40 CFR Part 61, Appendix B, Method 106, Section 5.2.3.1 and (2) obtained an
independent analysis of the audit cylinder that verifies that the audit gas concen-
tration is within 5% of the manufacturer's stated concentration.
3.6.9 Organic Compounds for Preparing Gaseous Standards - If gaseous standards are
to be prepared in the field, check to see if the organic compounds to be used are
at least 99-9# pure or, if less than 99-9#» of known purity necessary to calculate
the gaseous standard concentration. Record the manufacturer's lot number for each
standard compound.
3.6.10 Equipment for Preparing Gaseous Standards by Liquid or Gas Infection-
Confirm that the Tedlar bags to contain the gaseous standards have been leak check-
ed following the procedures described in Subsection 3-5-9- Check to see that the
syringes selected are gas-tight, cover the range needed (1.0- to 10-microliters for
liquids and 0.5 ml for gases), and are accurate to within i%. Confirm that the dry
gas meter and temperature gauge have been calibrated following the procedures
described in Subsection 2.0. Clean the midget impinger assembly with detergent and
tap water, and then rinse with deionized distilled water. Check the system for
leaks as follows: Assemble the appropriate system for preparing standards (see
Figure 5.5 for gaseous materials or Figure 5.6 for liquid materials). Fit the
injection port with a new septum. Fill the Tedlar bag and pressurize the system
to 5 to 10 cm (2 to 4 in.) Hg. Any loss of pressure after 10 minutes indicates a
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 32 S~\
leak. Reject or repair the system if a leak is indicated.
3.7 Packing Equipment for Shipment
The packing techniques described in this section are not requirements, but are
suggestions based on previous field experience. The type of packaging for equip-
ment going to the field depends on the mode of transportation. Typically, packing
equipment for transport by a common carrier will require the greatest degree of
effort to ensure the equipment arrives on-site in its original condition. When
possible, delicate equipment should be packed in the original shipping containers.
For convenience, label all containers with the contents for easy identification in
the field. The most common mode of packing will be in a van or trailer, where the
equipment will remain during transport. More sophisticated test firms have trai-
lers or trucks dedicated to the type of sampling being conducted. These units are
often designed to allow the test equipment and instruments to remain set up during
transport. This approach minimizes the time and effort required to set up before
and breakdown after a test. A dedicated test vehicle provides a working environ-
ment that greatly enhances the quality of work that can be performed.
3.7-1 Probe - Pack the probe in a rigid case protected by polyurethane foam, poly-
ethylene bubble-pack, or other suitable packing material. Seal the inlet and
outlet of the probe with tape or other suitable material. Protect any protruding
gloss ends from breakage by insertion into rigid plastic pipe lined with foam or
other packing material.
3.7-2 Teflon Tubing, Sample Lines, and Vacuum Lines - All tubing, sample lines,
and vacuum lines should be coiled and secured with tape. Coils should be large
enough not to crimp tubing or excessively strain the heat sheath. Seal all open-
ings with tape.
3-7-3 Quick Connects, Flow Control Valves and other Connectors - All connectors,
valves, and other small parts should be packed in small parts cabinets, trays with
divided compartments, or storage chests with labeled drawers to provide quick and
easy access to the desired part.
3.7.4 Barometer - The field barometer should be packed in a rigid container,
securely mounted in rigid foam. The barometer case should be packed in a larger
box designated to contain delicate or fragile equipment.
3.7-5 Thermometers and Thermocouple Readouts - Thermometers and thermocouple read-
outs should be packed in the original carrying case, if possible. Glass thermome-
ters should be packed in a rigid tube to prevent breakage. These items, in their
smaller packing, should also be packed in a larger box designated to contain deli-
cate or fragile equipment.
3«7-6 Method 4 Equipment - Method 4 equipment should be packed following the pro-
cedures recommended in Section 3.3.3 of this Handbook.
3.7.7 S-type Pitot Tube and Differential Pressure Gauge - The S-type pitot tube,
when not mounted on the sampling probe, should packed in a rigid case and wrapped
with polyurethane foam, polyethylene bubble-pack, or other suitable type of packing
material. Seal all openings with tape or other, suitable material. The differen-
tial pressure gauge, if not part of a meter box, should be mounted in a rigid
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 33
housing. The gauge should be wrapped with polyurethane foam, polyethylene bubble-
pack, or other suitable material, and packed in a larger box designated for deli-
cate and fragile equipment.
3-7-8 Glassware - All glassware should be packed in the original shipping contain-
ers, if available, and stored together in a larger rigid container marked "Fragile!
Glass." Otherwise, wrap the glassware with polyurethane foam, polyethylene bubble-
pack, or other suitable material, and pack in a rigid foam-lined container marked
"Fragile! Glass."
3.7.9 Tedlar Bags - Preferably, transport the Tedlar bags to the field in individ-
ual rigid containers used for sampling. If this is not possible, pack the bags,
individually, in corrugated cardboard boxes with the connectors secured such that
they do not contact and puncture the bags.
3-7-10 Sampling Pumps - Sampling pumps, if not mounted in a rigid housing suitable
for transport, should be packed in a rigid foam-lined container.
3.7.H Dilution Interface System - The dilution interface system should be built
into in a rigid container suitable for shipment. • :
3-7-12 Gas Chromatograph System - The gas chromatograph and ancillary systems
should be packed in the original shipping container for transport. Although it is
not recommended, the GC can be transported with out additional! packaging in a van
or trailer provided the GC is secured properly against movement and other equipment
is not packed in a manner where it could fall on the instrument. For transport in
dedicated test vehicles, the instruments should be mounted in shock absorbing
devices. All gas lines and analytical columns should be capped to prevent con-'
tamination and/or oxidation during shipment.
3-7-13 Gas Cylinders - All gas cylinders should be transported with their protec-
tive cylinder heads securely attached. The cylinders should be secured horizontal-
ly so that they do not roll together or vertically in a specially designed cylinder
rack. Be aware of and adhere to all Federal, State, and local regulations involv-
ing the transport of compressed and flammable gases, particularly through tunnels.
3.7.14 Liquid Organic Compounds - Liquid organic compounds should be shipped with
the container top sealed with electricians tape and stored in a sealed plastic bag.
Packed each container in its original shipping box, if available. Otherwise, wrap
each container individually with polyurethane foam, polyethylene bubble-pack, or
other suitable material and place in a box designated for chemicals.
3.7.15 Dry Gas Meters - Dry gas meters not housed in a rigid meter box suitable
for transport should be wrapped with polyurethane foam, polyethylene bubble-pack,
or other suitable material, and packed in a larger box designated for delicate or
fragile equipment.
-------
Section No.- 3-16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 34
Table 3.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR PRELIMINARY SURVEY SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
Characteristic
Apparatus Check
Barometer
Wet bulb/dry bulb
thermometers
Method 4 equipment
S-type pitot tube
and differential
pressure
Probe
Teflon tubing
Quick connects
Glass flasks
High-vacuum pump
Tedlar or alumi-
nized Mylar bags
Acceptance limits
Within 2.5 mm
(0.1 in.) Hg of
mercury-in-glass
barometer
Within 1°C (2°F) of
a mercury-in-glass
thermometer
See Section 3.3.3
of this Handbook
See Section 3.1.3
of this Handbook
1. Clean; glass
liner, stainless
steel, or Teflon
inert to organics
2. Heating properly
if equipped with
heating system
3. Leak free
New and unused
New or clean
Clean
Vacuum of 75 n™
(3 in.) Hg absolute
Leak free; no
loss of pressure
after 30 seconds
Frequency and method
of measurement
Before each field trip
As above
Same as Section 3.3«3
Same as Section 3- 1-3
Before each field trip
following the proced-
ures described in Sub-
section 3«5-l
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
Prior to each test
pressurize to 5 to 10
cm (2 to 4 in.) H20
Action if
requirements
are not met
Repair or replace
Replace
Same as Section
3.3.3
Same as Section
3.1.3
Repeat cleaning
Repair or replace
As above
Obtain new tubing
Clean according
to manufacturer's
recommendation
Repeat cleaning
of flasks
Repair or replace
As above
o
o
(Continued)
-------
Section No. 3-16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 35
Table 3.1 (Continued)
Charac teris tic
Apparatus Check
Rigid containers
Direct pump
sampling system
Needle valve and
rotameter
Adsorption Tube
Procedure
Adsorption tubes
Personnel sampling
pump
Extraction solvent
Teflon tubing
On-site Measure-
ments and Sampling
Wet bulb/dry bulb
measurement
Acceptance limits
Leak free; no
loss of pressure
after 30 seconds
Leak free; no
loss of pressure
after 30 seconds
Clean
Proper type of
adsorption material
Calibrated
Proper type of
extraction solvent
New and unused
1. Wet bulb wick
moistened
2. Wet bulb temper-
ature stabilized
3. Record wet bulb
and dry bulb
temperature
Frequency and method
of measurement
Prior to each test
pressurize to 5 to 10
cm (2 to 4 in.) H20
As above
Prior to each trip or
at the sign of erratic
behavior
Before each field trip
As above
Prior to extraction
of tubes for analysis
Before each field trip
Prior to each
measurement
During measurement
Immediately after wet
bulb temperature
stabilizes
Action if
requirements
are not met
Repair or replace
As above
Clean following
manufacturer1 s
recommendations
Replace with
proper type
Repair or replace
Replace with
proper type
Obtain new tubing
Moisten
Allow to
stabilize
Repeat
measurement
(Continued)
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 36
Table 3.1 (Continued)
o
Characteristic
On-site Measure-
ments and Sampling
Evacuated glass
flask sampling
Purged glass
flask sampling
Acceptance limits
1. Flask evacuated
to pump capacity
2. Assemble; no
leakage
3« System purged up
to flask inlet
4. Stopcocks closed
and taped; flask
labeled
5- Flue gas tempera-
ture and static
pressure determined
1. Assemble; no
leakage
3. Entire system
purged for 2 minutes
3. Stopcocks closed
and taped; flask
labeled
4. Flue gas tempera-
ture and static
pressure determined
Frequency and method
of measurement
Prior to sample
collection
Before sample col-
lection, visually and
physically inspect
all connections
Immediately prior to
sampling
Immediately after
sampling
Immediately after
sampling
Before sample col-
lection, visually and
physically inspect
all connections
Immediately prior to
sampling
Immediately after
sampling
Immediately after
sampling
Action if
requirements
are not met
Evacuate flask
Check for leaks;
repair system;
repeat test
Purge system up
to flask inlet
Close and tape
stopcock; label
flask
Determine flue
gas temperature
and static
pressure
O
Check for leaks;
repair system;
repeat test
Purge entire
system for 2
minutes
Close and tape
stopcock; label
flask
Determine flue
gas temperature
and static
pressure
(Continued)
O
-------
Section No. 3-16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 37
Table 3.1 (Continued)
Characteristic
On-site Measure-
ments and Sampling
Flexible bag sam-
pling procedure
Adsorption tube
sampling procedure
Preliminary Survey
Sample Analysis
Calibration
standards
(Continued)
Acceptance limits
1. Assemble using
Figure 4.4; no
leakage
2. Flow rate set to
0.5 1pm; purge sy-
stem up to bag inlet
3. Flue gas tempera-
ture and static
pressure determined
4. Bag labeled and
protected from
sunlight
1. Assemble using
Figure 4.9. no
leakage
2. Tubes capped,
labeled and stored
3- Flue gas tempera-
ture and static
pressure determined
1. Minimum of three
standards prepared
for each analyte
2. Sufficient peak
resolution achieved
(valley height <25#
of the sum of the 2
peak heights)
Frequency and method
of measurement
Before sample col-
lection, visually and
physically inspect
all connections
Immediately prior to
sampling
Immediately after
sampling
Immediately after
sampling
Before sample col-
lection, visually and
physically inspect
all connections
Immediately after to
sampling
Immediately after
sampling
Prior to sample
analysis
During multiple
component standard
analysis
Action if
requirements
are not met
Check for leaks;
repair system;
repeat test
Set flow rate
Purge system up
to flask inlet
Determine flue gas
temperature and
static pressure
Label bag and
protect from
sunlight-
Check for leaks;
repair system;
repeat test
Cap, label and
store tubes
Determine flue
gas temperature
and static press.
Prepare three
standards for
each analyte
Vary GC operating
conditions and/or
change column
type
-------
Table 3.1 (Continued)
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 38
o
Characteristic
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Preliminary Survey
Sample Analysis
Calibration
standards
3. Response for
consecutive repli-
cate injections of
each standard agree
within 5% of their
average response
4. Calibration curve
generated
5. Audit sample
(optional) analysis
results within iO%
of true value
During calibration
standard analysis
Repeat injections
After calibration
standard analysis
As above
Perform regres-
sion analysis and
plot curve
Repeat audit;
remake and
reanalyze
standards
O
Glass flask sample
analysis
(Continued)
1. Condensation in
sample flask
2. Flask not
pressurized
3. Condensation in
pressurized flask
after 10 minute
equilibration
4. Adequate resolu-
tion between peaks
achieved for peaks
>5% of total area
5. Retention times
of consecutive in-
jections determined
and agree within 0.5
seconds or 1%
Before sample analysis
As above
As above
During sample analysis
After sample analysis
Heat flask to
flue gas or duct
temperature
Pressurize flask
Heat flask to
vaporize conden-
sate; if flask
already heated,
release pressure
and repressurize
Vary GC operating
conditions and/or
change column
type
Repeat analysis
O
-------
Section No. 3-16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 39
Table 3.1 (Continued)
Characteristic
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Preliminary Survey
Sample Analysis
Flexible bag
samples
1. Response for
consecutive repli-
cate injections of
each sample agree
within 5% of their
average response
2. Stability of bag
samples acceptable
(second analysis
conducted an equal
number of days cor-
responding to the
the time elapsed
between sample col-
lection and first
analysis within 10%)
During sample analysis
After second analysis
Repeat analysis;
diagnose GC
problem
Consider one
of the alternate
sampling methods
Adsorption tube
samples
1. Samples desorbed
for period specified
in referenced method
2. Response for
consecutive repli-
cate injections of
each sample agree
within 5% of their
average response
3. Desorption effi-
ciency >50#
Before sample analysis
During sample analysis
After sample analysis
Check referenced
method; desorb
for specified
period
Repeat analysis;
diagnose GC
problem
Evaluate more
vigorous desorp-
tion techniques;
Consider one of
the alternative
sampling methods
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 40
Table 3.2. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR PRESAMPLINQ PREPARATION
Characteristic
Apparatus Check
Barometer
Wet bulb/dry bulb
thermometers
Method 4 equipment
S-type pitot tube
and differential
pressure
Probe
Teflon tubing
Quick connects
Sampling pump
Tedlar bags
Rigid containers
Acceptance limits
Within 2.5 mm
(0.1 in.) Hg of
mercury-in-glass
barometer
Within 1°C (2°F) of
a mercury-in-glass
thermometer
See Section 3.3.3
of this Handbook
See Section 3.1.3
of this Handbook
1. Clean; glass
liner, stainless
steel, or Teflon
inert to organics
2. Heating properly
if equipped with
heating system
3- Leak free
New and unused
New or clean
Leak free; adequate
delivery (>^ 1 Lpm)
Leak free; no
loss of pressure
after 10 minutes
Leak free; no
loss of pressure
after 30 seconds
Frequency and method
of measurement
Before each field trip
As above
Same as Section 3.3.3
Same as Section 3- 1.3
Prior to each trip
follow the cleaning
procedure described
in Subsection 3«5«1
Prior to each trip
As above
As above
As above
Prior to each trip
check with a rotameter
Prior to each test
pressurize to 5 to 10
cm (2 to 4 in.) H20
Prior to each test
pressurize to 5 to 10
cm (2 to 4 in.) H20
Action if
requirements
are not met
Repair or replace
Replace
Same as Section
3.3.3
Same as Section
3-1.3
Repeat cleaning
Repair or replace
As above
Obtain new tubing
Clean according
to manufacturer's
recommendation
Repair or replace
As above
As above
o
o
o
(Continued)
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 41
Table 3.2 (Continued)
Characteristic
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Apparatus Check
Direct pump
sampling system
Leakfree; no
loss of pressure
after 30 seconds
Prior to each test
pressurize to 5 to 10
cm (2 to 4 in.)
As above
Needle valve and
rotameter
Clean
Prior to each trip or
at the sign of erratic
behavior
Clean following
manufacturer's
recommendations
Explosion risk
area sampling
system
Leakfree (no vacuum
loss after 1 minute)
Prior to each trip
Repair or replace
Heated bag
sampling container
1. Leakfree; no
loss of pressure
after 30 seconds
2. Heating properly
Prior to each test
pressurize to 5 to 10
cm (2 to 4 in.) H20
As above
As above
As above
Direct interface
sampling system
1. Heating properly
2. Leakfree (no
flow at rotameter
with probe plugged)
As above
As above
As above
As above
Dilution interface
sampling system
1. Heating properly
2. Flowmeters cali-
brated
3. Leakfree; no
loss of pressure
after 30 seconds
As above
Calibrate prior to
each test against a
bubble meter or
spirometer
Prior to each test
pressurize to 5 to 10
cm (2 to 4 in.) H.,0
As above
Calibrate
Gas chromatograph
equipment
Leakfree, opera-
tional, and suffi-
cient spare parts
for the duration of
the field test
Prior to field test
check system for
leaks, access opera-
tional condition, and
inventory spare parts
Consult the
operator's
manual
(Continued)
-------
Section No. 3.16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 42
o
Table 3.2 (Continued)
Characteristic
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Reagents and
Equipment
Charcoal adsorber
Sufficient supply
Check supply prior to
each field test
Procure more
adsorbent
Adsorption tubes
Proper adsorbent,
tube size, and
quantity for test
Prior to field test
refer to Method
Highlights Section and
preliminary survey
results
Procure proper
adsorbent, tube
size, and
quantity
Gas chromatograph
carrier gas
Carrier gas compat-
ible to GC and
column; sufficient
quantity for test
Prior to field test
refer to operator's
manual or consult
with manufacturer
Procure compat-
ible carrier gas
in sufficient
quantity
O
Auxiliary GC gases
Proper type and
grade for GC detec-
tor; sufficient
quantity for test
Prior to field test
refer to operator's
manual or consult
with manufacturer
Procure proper
type and grade
of gases in suf-
ficient quantity
Calibration gases
Proper component(s)
and range; suffi-
cient quantity for
any on-site calibra-
tions
Prior to field test
refer to the prelim-
inary survey results
Obtain gases with
the proper compo-
nents in the
necessary range
and quantity
Calibration gas
dilution system
1. Rotameters clean
and calibrated
2. Dilution ratio
known (optional)
Prior to field test
examine and calibrate
following procedures
in Subsection 2.2
Prior to field test
establish the ratio
following the proced-
ures in Section 5-0
Clean and
calibrate
Check dilution
ratio prior to
analysis
(required)
Zero gas
Hydrocarbon-free
(<0.1 ppmv as pro-
pane or carbon equi-
valent) ; sufficient
supply for test
Analyze or consult
manufacturer
Procure hydro-
carbon-free gas
in sufficient
quantity for test
O
(Continued)
-------
Section No. 3.1613
Date June 30, 1988
Page 43
Table 3.2 (Continued)
Characteristic
Audit gases
Organic compounds
for preparing
gaseous standards
Equipment for
preparing gaseous
standards
Packing Equip-
ment for Shipment
Probe
Teflon tubing,
sampling lines,
and vacuum lines
Quick connects,
flow control
valves, and other
connectors
Barometer
Thermometers and
thermocouple read-
outs
Method 4 equipment
S-type pitot tube
and differential
pressure gauge
Acceptance limits
Required audit gases
in proper range
Target compound (s)
99 -9# pure or of
known purity
See Subsection
3.6.10
Protect with suit-
able packing
material
Coiled and taped;
openings taped
Stored organized
in containers
Packed in rigid foam
in a rigid container
Packed in original
container, if pos-
sible, or rigid
container
See Section 3.3-3 of
this Handbook
See Section 3-1.3 of
this Handbook
Frequency and method
of measurement
Prior to field test
contact EPA or vendor
(see Subsection 3.6.8)
Prior to field test
contact manufacturer
or vendor
See Subsection 3.6.10
Prior to each shipment
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
Action if
requirements
are not met
Acquire required
audit gas(es)
Procure 99.9#
pure compound(s)
or compound(s) of
known purity
See Subsection
3.6.10
Repack
Coil and tape
Repack
As above
As above
See Section 3-3.3
of this Handbook
See Section 3-1.3
of this Handbook
(Continued)
-------
Section No. 3-16.3
Date June 30, 1988
Page 44
o
Table 3.2 (Continued)
Characteristic
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Packaging Equip-
ment for Shipment
Glassware
Packed in original
shipping containers,
if available, or
suitable packing
material and marked
"Fragile"
Prior to each shipment
Repack
Tedlar bags
Packed in rigid sam-
pling containers, if
possible, or packed
individually in cor-
rugated boxes with
connectors secured
As above
As above
O
Sampling pumps
and dry gas meters
Mounted in a rigid
housing or packed in
rigid foam-lined
containers
As above
As above
Dilution interface
system
Built into a rigid
container suitable
for shipment
As above
Rebuild into
rigid container
or pack in suit-
able material
Gas chromatograph
system
Packed in original
shipping container,
secured properly in
van or trailer, or
mounted in a desig-
nated test vehicle
As above
Repack
Gas cylinders
Protective heads on,
secured in van or
trailer; transported
in compliance with
Federal, state, and
local regulations
As above
Repack; check
Federal, s tate,
and local regu-
lations concern-
ing transport of
compressed gases
Liquid organic
compounds
Top sealed and pack-
ed in original ship-
ping container
As above
Tape and repack
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 1
4.0 ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
On-site activities include transporting the equipment to the test site,
unpacking and assembling the sampling and/or analytical equipment, then conducting
the sampling and/or analysis for the predetermined organic compound(s). The qual-
ity assurance activities for the on-site measurements are summarized in Table 4.1
at the end of this section. Copies of all field data forms mentioned in this
section are in Subsection 3.16.12. The on-site measurements checklist. Figure 4.10
at the end of this section, provides the tester with a quick method for checking
requirements during sampling.
4.1 Transportation of Equipment to the Sampling Site
The most efficient means of transporting the equipment from ground level to the
sampling site (often above ground level) should be decided during the preliminary
survey or by prior correspondence. Care should be taken to prevent damage to the
equipment or injury to test personnel during the moving. A clean "laboratory" type
area free of excessive dust and organic compounds should be located and designated
for preparing the sampling systems and conducting sample recovery and analysis, if
applicable.
4.2 Preliminary Measurements and Setup
Method 18 strongly recommends that a preliminary survey and/or laboratory
evaluation be conducted prior to sampling and analysis. Unless adequate prior
knowledge of the source or information is available, the presurvey procedures
described in Subsection 3-0 on presampling operations should be followed to select
an acceptable sampling and analytical approach.
The accuracy of the sampling system(s) following handling and transportation to
the sampling site is determined using a cylinder gas audit. The integrity of the
system(s) is confirmed after setup by conducting the individual system check
described below for the applicable sampling method. Preliminary measurements will
always include determining the stack dimensions and the flue gas moisture. Other
measurements which may be made depending upon the requirements of the applicable
regulations and the source operations include a flow rate determination, velocity
check, and stack gas temperature range measurement.
One of the primary concerns for any organic sampling program must be safety.
The tester should always question the facility representative concerning general
plant safety requirements and safety in regard to sampling at the selected
sampling site. Every sampling and analysis protocol should address the safety
considerations involved in performing the protocol. Because there are numerous
safety considerations involved in organic sampling, it is beyond the scope of this
Handbook to discuss each one in detail. However, it cannot be over-emphasiged that
the tester must always be aware of the safety hazards.
4.3 Sampling
The following subsections discuss the procedures for each Method 18 sampling
technique. At this point, the tester has selected the proper sampling technique
and checked the selected sampling system. If this has not been accomplished, the
user should refer to Subsection 3-0 prior to conducting the field test.
-------
Section No. 3-16.1*
Date June 30, 1988
Page 2
Because of the complexity in sampling organic compounds from the variety of
potential source types, only the more common problems are addressed for each sam-
pling method. Recommended quality assurance/control checks and procedures are
provided to assess the suitability of the sampling technique for the samples to be
collected. Because of the relative compactness of the equipment and the low cost
of many of the sampling techniques, the tester may be able to utilize two different
sampling techniques at the same time with little additional effort. The samples
from the backup or secondary technique are not analyzed if the primary technique
proves satisfactory. For example, the tester might easily run an adsorption tube
system as a backup to an evacuated bag system. At some facilities, it may be
necessary to conduct two techniques simply to accurately measure all the organic
compounds of interest. The tester should always be aware that a change in process
operations such as raw materials, moisture content, operation mode, and temperature
can render a previously acceptable sampling technique unacceptable.
The specific sampling system descriptions are provided below.
4.3.1 Evacuated Container Sampling (Heated and Unheated) - In this procedure,
sample bags are filled by evacuating the rigid air-tight containers that hold them.
The suitability of the bags for sampling should have been confirmed by permeation
and retention checks using the specific organic compounds of interest during the
presurvey operations. The means of transporting the bags to the laboratory for
analysis within the specified time should also have been determined. Delays in
shipping and/or analysis can result in significant changes in concentration for
many compounds.
On-site sampling includes the following steps:
1. Conducting preliminary measurements and setup.
2. Preparation and setup of sampling system.
3. Preparation of the probe. ;
4. Connection of electrical service and leak check of sampling system.
5. Insertion of probe into duct and sealing of port.
6. Purging of sampling system.
7. Proportional sampling.
8. Recording data.
9. Recovering sample and transportion to laboratory.
Preliminary Measurements and Setup - The sampling site should be checked to
ensure that adequate electrical service is available. The stack dimensions are
measured and recorded on a data sheet similar to the ones shown in Figures 4.1, 4.2
and 4.3. The moisture content of the flue gas is used to correct the measured
concentrations to a dry basis. It is typically measured prior to sampling using
wet bulb/dry bulb thermometers or Method 4 (see Subsection 3^2); the determination
should be performed at a time when process operations are like they will be during
final sampling. If the process utilizes and emits ambient air, a sling psychro-
meter may be used to measure the moisture content of the ambient air in the area of
process air uptake. The moisture content value is also used to confirm that the
sampling approach selected is acceptable.
Prior to final sampling, the tester must determine if the final results are to
be presented on a concentration basis or a mass emission basis. If they will be
presented only on a concentration basis, only the concentrations of the specified
organics and the stack gas moisture content must be measured. If the mass emission
rate of any compound is to be presented, the flow rate of the stack gas using a
velocity traverse must also be determined. In this case, although not required by
Method 18, it is preferable that the sampling location be selected in accordance
/f-^.
f J
o
o
-------
Plant KubUr C-rU>n L*- Flowmeter calib.(Y) O. ?1 <> Dilution
City 7y^s/7tf., /VC-
Operator /4tf/?^ C^isve^
Date 5L/D.fc>/^
Run number' f?C.~l
Stack dia,
mm (in. ) (, /'M.
Sample box number A//A
Pitot tube (Cp)
f).f)4-
Static press Q mm (in.) H20
Sampling
time ,
min
O
/O
2-0
30
4-0
4-$
50
Total (fO
Clock
time,
24 h
W+l-
• '-
10:41
Velocity head
mm (in.) H20,
oSb
°0*&
°o%
"o.sz.
°^&
C/ •^f'\P
fj At
0.4k
Avg Q.SZ
Container type: bag X emissio
syringe diluent
canister
Container volume, 3<2
Container number
Average (aP) &.
Dilution
&&~~d>
^ jaa
Initial flowmeter setting
Average stack temp (?4
Barometric press
Flowmeter
setting
L/min (jPt*-/Eniii)
0- Ik!-
..-*.'£».
o.iw
0./6$-
0.141
0.14-1,
Av* 0.)&
liters emissio
Final le
"(in.) H20 Vacuum d
/.oz
?
?- mm titrT)
stack
U
JJ
iP 7
^ /
11
W
&
Avg (,*
probe
°C (°F)
MA
(
Avg
sy s tern : ( dynamic )
n flowsetting /V/4
flowsetting
system: (stat
n flowsetting
ak check ^
uring leak che
F) Sampling point locatio
Hg <%>9?&r- O/^tffavt-
tf/A
ic)
AS/A
m3/iain (cfm)
ck /O
cm (in.) H20
n
Temperature
sample line
°C (°F)
NlA
\
)
h
V,
1
Avg
readings
flowoeter box
°C (°F)
*/*
/
(
)
(
\
Avg
container
°C (°F)
#M
/
(
\
/
'
Avg
Figure 4.1. Field sampling data fora for container sampling.
nj o w
CD p CD
TO rt O
(D (D ft
LO
vD
O3
-------
Plant l\ubk-&f^ Cb\JL*f^_ Co-
City rfrsiH'c . tfC-
Operator /fan* Cl i>W6^
Date / /&4, Ibfr
Run number'
Stack dia.
/?d- / —*£d-f2--
nm (in.) ^ />,.
Barometric press T^T na (Iff.
Initial probe setting °C
"T Hg Sample loop volun
(°F) Sample loop temp
e i.O ml
-3./C? tO^(°F)
Sampling rate £. /5~2_ L/nin (cfm) Column temperature:
Sampling point local
C&fj^&r of &
ion
initial Cotisfant/
/CO °C/min
^^- program rate >A^ / °C/min
Dilution systen: final — / /OO °C/min
source flowrate 0.152. L/nin (cfn) Carrier gas flow
Meter box number /V/4
Stack temp
/gc>
?/<:
Vacuum @ check IO jrr"{in.) H00
ettings
diluent
nl/min
\
/
y
(
)
(
1
stack
ojg^jopj
/go
'/??
161
'm
/&D
%L
Temperat
probe
/80
l&b
/?0
izt
'ff*
/«
160
ure readings
sample line
ieo
I6o
'tel
^
/»/
'il'i
X
injection port
;
IT/
H
2ii
£-10
5if
3HO
Figure 4.2. Field sampling data form for direct interface sampling.
o
o
t) O C/5
{B S3 (D
m cr o
(0 (0 rt
H-
-p- c_i O
C 3
ro 2:
o
u.
CX>-
00-^
O
-------
Plant
City
Operator
Date /
Cklsn Co. Flowmeter calib. (Y) //2
Run number
Stack dia, mm (in.) (D //}.
Adsorption tube type:
charcoal tube X
silica gel
other
Dilution system: (dynamic)
emission flowsetting /V/4
diluent flowsetting
Meter box number
Pitot tube (Cp)
Static press ()
Adsorption tube number
Average (aP) Q.4- na (in.) H20
Initial flowmeter setting A/2.
Average stack temp ~7O
mm (in.) 1^0 Barometric press .2-9.65" ma (in.) Hg
Dilution system: (static)
emission flowsetting
Final leak check 0 m3/iain (cfin)
Vacuum during leak check /O
ma (in.) H.,0
Sampling point location '
Sampling
time,
min
O
/o
^
3o
45-
(sO
Total (fQ
Clock
time,
24 h
193*
,**
Velocity head
Sim-fin.) H20,
04
04
0.4*
04
04
0.4
04
04
0.4-
04
04
04
Avg Q q.
Flowmeter
setting
L/min (£ti/oln)
1.12-
1,/z
I.IZ
/,'/l
A/2
A/z
A/Z
1.12-
/./L
A/Z
1.1 1
Avg /, / Z_
stack
^6
tt
JO
*i
%.
7$
7-2.
Avg7/
Temperature r
probe, line
X
6?
(,1
70
^
?2
73
Avg T-/
•eadings
adsorp . tube
>C* (°F)
46
4?
%
fo
SI
si
Avg 5£>
meter
• o
4 9
5
52?
50
57
Avg S£>
Vacuum
^sf(in.) Hg
11
11
11
11
H
Z
11
Avg 11
tl O W
P {D fl>
W ft O
(0 (D ft
Figure 4.3. Field sampling data form for adsorption tube sampling.
O
U) •
O
- CO
vo cr>
oo.
OO.P-
-------
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988 x—^
Page 6 f J
with Method 1. If this is impractical, it should be selected to minimize flow
disturbances. The number and locations of sampling points for the velocity traverse
are selected according to Method 1 (see Section 3.0.1 of this Handbook); the trav-
erse is conducted according to Method 2 (see Section 3-1 of this Handbook). Note:
The Method 18 sampling will be conducted at a single point.
Method 18 requires that samples be collected proportionally, meaning that the
sampling rate must be kept proportional to the stack gas velocity at the sampling
point during the sampling period. If the process has a steady state flow (con-
stant) , then the flow rate does not have to be varied during sampling. The major-
ity of sources of organic emissions are of this type because they use constant rate
fans. If the tester can confirm from the facility that the source of interest has a
steady state flow (e.g., it uses a constant rate fan), then sampling can be conduc-
ted at a constant rate and no concurrent velocity measurements need to be made.
If it is not known whether the process is steady state or if it is not steady
state, then velocity measurements (the velocity head) must be made at the point to
be sampled. This can be done during the preliminary survey or before final
sampling, but should be done when the process operations are like they will be
during the final sampling. The average velocity head (pitot reading) and range of
fluctuation is determined and then utilized to establish the proper flow rate
settings during sampling. If it is found that the process is not steady state,
then the velocity head must be monitored during sampling to maintain a constant
proportion between the sample flow rate and the flow rate in the duct.
Select a total sampling time greater than or equal to the minimum total samp-
ling time specified in the applicable emission standard. The number of minutes
between readings while sampling should be an integer. It is desirable for the time
between readings to be such that the flow rate does not change more than 20% during
this period.
If it was determined from the literature or the preliminary survey laboratory
work that the sampling system must be heated during sample collection and analysis,
the average stack temperature is used as the reference temperature for the initial
heating of the system and should be determined. Then, the stack temperature at the
sampling point is measured and recorded during sampling to adjust the heating
system just above the stack temperature or the dew point. In addition, the use of
a heated sampling system typically requires that the analysis be conducted on-site
since it is not practical to maintain the sample bag at elevated temperatures for
long periods of time.
Sampling System Preparation - Prepare the probe and sampling train in the
laboratory area (see Figure 4.4). First, place a loosely packed filter of glass
wool in the end of the probe. Attach a sample bag that has been previously leak
checked to the sample container lid. Seal the inlet to the probe and the sample
container lid to the container body. Transport the container and probe to the
sampling site.
Proportional Sampling - Sampling must be conducted at a rate in constant
proportion to the stack gas flow at the sampling point. Thus, for a steady state
operation, the sampling flow rate is not varied during the run. For a non-steady
state process, the sampling flow rate is varied in proportion to the changing
velocity. The velocity is monitored by measuring the velocity head (AP) which is
linearly related to the square of the velocity. A recommended method for deter-
mining proportional sampling rates is as follows:
1. Conduct a single point velocity check as previously specified, and determine
the average velocity head (APa ) to be sampled.
o
-------
VENT
STACK
WALL
FILTER
(GLASS WOOL)
D
TEFLON
SAMPLE LINE
f
REVERSE
(3") TYPE
PITOT TUBE
PROBE
VACUUM LINE
MALE QUICK
PONNECTORS.
NEEDLE
VE
BALL
•f CHECK
FLOWMETER!
PUMP
CHARCOAL
TUBE
PITOT MANOMETER
NO CHECK
RIGID LEAKPROOF CONTAINER
Figure 4.4. Integrated bag sampling system.
T3 O W
jn p 0>
OT rt O
(D (0 rt
H-
-J «-« O
(0 "Z
O
t-o .
O
vO O\
00'
CD 4=-
-------
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 8
2. The average sampling flow rate for the test is determined prior to the start
of the run. Typically, the average sampling flow rate is about 0.5 L/min
which will yield approximately 30 liters of sample. The flow rate chosen in
the laboratory should fill the bag to about three fourths of its capacity
during the sample run. The average flow rate chosen is then assigned to the
average velocity head measured.
3. The flow rate to be used during sampling when the velocity head varies from
the average is calculated using the following equation.
Equation 4-1
Q. =
o
where
Q^ = Average sampling rate, L/min (ft3/min),
Qg = Calculated sampling rate, L/min (ft3/min),
AP = Actual velocity head, mm (in.) H20, and
APavg = Average velocity head, mm (in.) H20.
4. Determine the rotameter setting for the sampling rate (Qs) from the rota-
meter calibration curve, and adjust the rotameter accordingly.
Using this procedure will provide for the correct sampling rate and the proper
filling of the sample bag. Follow the procedure below to obtain an integrated
sample.
1. If a heating system is required, turn on the heating system and set at
average stack temperature determined from the pretest measurements.
2. Leak check the sampling train just prior to sampling by connecting a U-
tube, inclined manometer, or equivalent at the probe inlet and pulling a
vacuum of >^ 10 in. H20. Close the needle valve and then turn the pump off.
The vacuum should remain stable for at least 30 seconds. If a leak is
found, repair before proceeding; if not, slowly release the vacuum gauge.
This leak check is optional.
3- If the system is being heated, wait for it to come to the proper tempe-
rature. Place the probe in the stack at the sampling point: centroid of the
stack or no closer to the walls than 1 meter. Seal the sampling port to
prevent dilution of the stack gas by inleakage of ambient air.
4. Disconnect the flexible bag. Purge the system by turning on the pump and
drawing at least 5 times the sampling system volume through the train, or
purge for 10 minutes, whichever is greater.
5. Adjust the flow rate to the proper setting based on the velocity pressure
(during the purging, for non-steady state processes).
6. Connect the flexible bag to the sampling train (the connections should
ensure a leakfree system), and begin sampling. The rate must remain propor-
tional to the stack gas velocity for the total sampling time specified by the
standard of performance for the industry being sampled.
7. Record all data required (5 minute intervals, miniumum) on the field samp-
ling data form (see Figure 4.1). The flow rate and sample train heating
system should be adjusted after every pitot and temperature reading to the —
correct level. f ^
8. Disconnect and seal the flexible bag upon completion of sampling. Take care \ J
not to dilute the contents with ambient air.
9- Label each bag clearly and uniquely to identify it with its corresponding
data form and/or run. If the system is a heated system, the sample bag must
-------
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 9
be maintained at the stack temperature through sample analysis.
Sample Recovery and Transport to Laboratory - Sample recovery should be
performed so as to prevent contamination of the bag sample and maintain sample
integrity. The bag should remain leakfree, protected from direct sunlight, main-
tained at a temperature that will prevent condensation of any of the gases, and
stored in a safe place to prevent damage or tampering prior to analysis. It is
recommended that bag samples be analyzed within two hours of sample collection,
however, many of the organic compounds are stable enough to allow a few days prior
to analysis. Upon completion of the testing and sample recovery, all the data
forms should be checked for completeness and the sample bags reexamined for proper
identification.
Common Problems - The most common problems encountered with bag sampling
techniques are (1) adsorption of the gases on the bag, (2) permeation of the gases
through the bag, (3) reaction of gases in the bag, (4) condensation of the gases or
water vapor in the bag, and (5) leaks developing in the bag during testing, trans-
port, and/or analysis. As described previously in Subsection 3«0, the bags must be
checked for stability and retention of the compound in the bag. If the compound's
concentration significantly diminishes between the time the sample run is completed
and the time of analysis, then the bag technique will have to be modified or rejec-
ted. One modification that can be used to reduce both retention and/or condensa-
tion is addition of a heating system. Heating is generally applied during sample
collection and maintained through analysis. However, heating may increase the
permeation rate. Another option is the use of heat lamps applied to the sample
bags after sample collection and during sample analysis. Two other techniques
that have been used to prevent condensation are (1) addition of a knockout trap to
remove water vapor and heavy organics from the sample stream, and (2) use of
sorbents such as Tenax to remove the high boiling point organics. The tester must
demonstrate that the organic coiapound(s) of interest are not removed.
Alternatively, sample and/or water vapor condensation may be reduced by the use of
the prefilled« bag technique. The prefilling of the bag lowers the concentration
of the organic and/or water vapor, thereby eliminating condensation.
If the gases are reacting in the bag, then the bag material can be changed, the
time between sample collection and analysis reduced, or a different technique used
such as direct interface sampling. Methods to reduce bag leak problems are proper
construction of the sample bags, conducting additional runs, using a backup sample
collection technique such as an another bag sampling system or an adsorption tube
sampling system, and care with handling the sampling bags. Also, steel canisters
can be used in place of the bags. If the organic compounds are stable with time,
the use of steel canisters may better ensure the safety of the sample especially if
the samples must be air freighted to the laboratory for analysis.
4.3'2 Direct Pump Sampling - Direct pump sampling is conducted in a manner similar
to evacuated container sampling, with the exception that the needle valve and the
pump are located between the probe and sample bag and the sample exposed surfaces
of both must be constructed of stainless steel, Teflon or other material not affec-
ted by the stack gas (see Figure 4.5). Due to the additional likelihood that
sample may be lost in the needle valve and pump, it is recommended that the probe,
sample line, needle valve, and pump be heated. If it has or can be shown that this
not a concern, then the heating may be eliminated. All precautions, procedures,
data forms and criteria from Subsection 4.3-1 above can be applied. Ensure that
the system has been adequately purged before attaching the bag and sampling.
-------
Stainless
Needle Vafvo
Filter
(Glass Woo!)
Reverse
(3") Type
Pitot Tube
Rotamotar
Teflon-Lined
Diaphragm
Pump
O
Protective Container
Figure 4.5- Direct pump sampling system.
o
Vacuum
Lino
•T3 O W
o so ro
Oq rt O
fl> CO ct
H-
M e-< O
O C 3
ro 2:
o
co .
o
- OJ
vo cr\
oo •
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 11
4.3-3 Explosion Risk Area Bag Sampling - Explosion risk area bag sampling is also
similar to evacuated container sampling. The major difference is that no electri-
cal components can be used in the explosion risk area. As previously mentioned in
Subsection 1.0, the first option of the tester is to locate the electrical equip-
ment (e.g., the pump) outside the explosion risk area and run a long flexible line
to the container. If that option is not possible, an evacuated steel container may
be used as shown in Figure 4.6. This option may involve a potential spark hazard
and must be checked though the plant safety officer. No electrical heating of the
system will likely be allowed. If an evacuated steel container is used, the leak
check can be conducted outside the explosion risk area and the probe can be purged
with a hand squeeze pump. The tester may wish to consider an alternative method of
sampling such as adsorption tubes and an" intrinsically safe personnel sampling pump
or the syringe method. The primary concern must be safety in an explosion risk area
and all operations must be outlined in writing and cleared through the Plant Safety
Officer. The same criteria as described above for suitability of the bag will
apply and must be met.
4.3.4 Prefilled Bag Sampling - The prefilled bag sampling technique is similar to
the heated direct pump sampling method. The major difference is that the sample
bag is prefilled with a known volume of nitrogen, hydrocarbon-free air, or cleaned,
dried ambient air prior to sampling and the volume of gas sampled must be accu-
rately determined (see Figure 4.5). When using a flowmeter or metering pump, the
maximum dilution that should be attempted is 10 to 1. Alternatively, a heated, gas
tight syringe may be used to collect the gas at the source and inject it into the
sample bag. A heated, gas tight syringe can be used for dilutions of 5 to 1 when
the dilution is performed in the syringe and 50 to 1 when performed in the bag.
The use of a heated, gas tight syringe should follow the procedures shown below in
Subsection 4.3«5. Both techniques should be verified•„in the laboratory using
higher concentrations of calibration gases and must be within 10% of the calculated
value. The technique is verified in the field by diluting the audit gases in the
same manner as the stack gases (see Subsection 8.0 for auditing procedures).
Following are the recommended steps to conduct prefilled bag sampling:
1. The sampling should be conducted proportionally as described above in Sub-
section 4.3.1. Calculation of the average sampling rate vs. the average P
will be the same with the exception that the volume of the prefilled inert
gas must be taken into account.
2. The suitability of the prefilled bag sampling technique should have been
checked in the laboratory. This would include calculating the dilution
factor required to obtain ;an acceptable sample concentration.
' 3« In the laboratory area, fill the sample bag (previously leak checked) with
the calculated volume of inert gas. Because of the potential for leaks,
bags should be filled the same day they are used. The inert gas volume
must be determined with a calibrated dry gas meter or mass flowmeter. The
bag should be sealed and taken to the sampling site.
4. At the sampling site, the sampling system is leak checked without the
sampling bag attached. Turn on the heating system and heat the system to
the stack temperature. Connect a U-tube H20 manometer or equivalent to the
inlet of the probe. After the system comes to the desired temperature, turn
on the pump and pull a vacuum of about 10 in. of H20. Turn off the needle
valve and shut off the pump. If there is no noticeable leak within 30
seconds, then the system is leak free.
5. Place the probe in the stack at the sampling point (centroid or no less
/i.
-------
PVC Tubing-
Directional
Nead!o
Vafvo
Quick Disconnectors
Probo
5'Triton
Tubing
o
Figure ^.6. Explosion risk area sampling system option using an
evacuated steel container.
co -c-
o
-------
6.
7-
8.
9.
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 13
than 1 meter from the wall) and seal the port so there will be no inleakage
of ambient air. Turn on the pump and purge the system for 10 minutes.
During the time that the system is purging, determine and set the proper
flow rate based on the Ap.
Turn off the pump and attach the sample bag. Compare the heating system
The sampling will be conducted proportionally. The stack temperature and
heating system temperature should be monitored and recorded. Record 'the
data on the sampling data form (Figure 4.1).
At the conclusion of the run, turn off the pump and remove the probe from
the duct. Remove the bag and seal it.
Conduct a final leak check. The system should pass the leak check; if it
does not pass, repeat the run.
4.3-5 Heated Syringe Sampling - The heated syringe technique can be used with the
prior approval of the Administrator. This technique should only be used when other
techniques are impractical. The heated syringe technique requires on-site analysis
with three syringes collected and analyzed for each run. The requirements for the
use of the syringes are the same as for the bag with regard to the reaction of the
gases with time and the retention of the gases in the syringe.
Following are the procedures recommended for the syringe sampling technique:
1. If heating is required, then the syringe must be encased in material that
has a high density to maintain the proper temperature. Alternatively, an
external heating system can be used that keeps the syringe at the proper
temperature until just before use and to which the syringe can be immedi-
ately returned.
2. The access port should be extremely small to prevent inleakage of ambient
air. The port may be covered with Teflon or other nonreactive material
that will allow the syringe to penetrate the material for sampling.
3. For the direct injection method (no dilution), place the syringe needle
into the stack and fill and discharge the full volume that will be sampled
three times. Then, draw the emission sample into the syringe, immediately
seal the syringe and return to the heating system, if applicable. The
second and third syringes are sampled at equal time intervals spanning the
required sample (run) time. The syringe samples must not be taken one
immediately after another.
4. For the diluted syringe method, the inert gas is introduced into the
syringe three times and discharged. Following this, the proper volume of
inert gas is pulled into the syringe. The syringe is then placed into the
duct and the proper volume of stack gas is added. Immediately remove the
syringe needle from the duct, seal the syringe, and return to the heating
system, if applicable.
5. For the bag diluted syringe method, the bag should be prefilled with the
proper volume of inert gas. The sampling is conducted as described above
and the sample injected into the bag through a septum.
6. Record the data on a field sampling data form (can adapt Figure 4.1).
7. Since the method requires a proportional sample to be collected, the
velocity head (AP) should be recorded at about the same time that each
sample is collected. The concentrations can then be mathematically
corrected to provide an integrated value. If the process is a constant
source operation (less than 10% change in flow over the sampling period),
it is not necessary to correct the measured values.
-------
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 14
4.3.6 Direct Interface Sampling - The direct interface procedure can be used
provided that the moisture content of the stack gas does not interfere with the
analysis procedure, the physical requirements of the equipment can be met at the
site, and the source gas concentration is low enough that detector saturation is
not a problem. Adhere to all safety requirements when using this method. Because
of the amount of time the GC takes to resolve the organic compounds prior to their
analysis, the GC can only typically make three analyses in a one-hour period.
Therefore, the number of injections in the direct interface method is greatly lim-
ited by the resolution time. At least three injections must be conducted per
sample run.
Following are the procedures recommended for extracting a sample from the
stack, transporting the sample through a heated sample line, and introducing it to
the heated sample loop and the GC. The analysis of the sample is described in
Subsection 5-0.
1. Assemble the system as shown Figure 4.7, making all connections tight.
2. Turn on the sampling system heaters. Set the heaters to maintain the stack
temperature as indicated by the stack thermocouple. If this temperature is
above the safe operating temperature of the Teflon components, adjust the
heating system to maintain a temperature adequate to prevent condensation of
water and organic compounds.
3. Turn on the sampling pumps and set the flow rate at the proper setting.
Typically 1 L/min is used.
4. After the system reaches the same temperature as the stack, connect a U-
tube H20 manometer or eqivalent to the inlet of the probe. Pull a vacuum
of about 10 in. of H20, and shut off the needle valve and then the pump.
The vacuum should remain stable for 30 seconds. If the system leaks,
repair and then recheck the system.
5. Calibrate the system as described in Subsection 5-0. Repeat until
duplicate analyses are within 5% of their mean value (Subsection 5«0).
6. Conduct the analyses of the two audit samples as described in Subsection
8.1. The results must agree within 10% of the true value (or greater, if
specified on the cylinder). If the results do not agree, repair the system
and repeat the analyses until agreement is met or until approval is given by
the representative of the Administrator.
7. After the audit has been successfully completed, place the inlet of the
probe at the centroid of the duct, or at a point no closer to the walls
than 1 meter, and draw stack gas into the probe, heated line, and sample
loop. Purge the system for a least 10 minutes.
8. Record the field sampling data on a form such as Figure 4.2.
9. Conduct the analysis of the sample as described in Subsection 5«0. Record
the data on the applicable data form (Figure 5-1, Subsection 5.0). Ensure
that the probe and sample lines are maintained at 0°C to 3°C above the
stack temperature (or a temperature which prevents condensation).
10. Conduct the posttest calibration as described in Subsection 5.0.
4.3.7 Dilution Interface Sampling - Source samples that contain a high concentra-
tion of organic materials may require dilution prior to analysis to prevent
saturating the GC detector. The apparatus required for this direct interface
procedure is basically the same as described above, except a dilution system is
added between the heated sample line and the gas sampling valve. The apparatus is
arranged so that either a 10:1 or 100:1 dilution of the source gas can be directed
to the chromatograph. The description of the apparatus is presented in Subsection
/"""N
f )
^—'
o
-------
MANOMETER
TC TC READOUT
READOUT OR CONTROLLER
GLASS
WOOL
1/2-in.
TUBING
1/4-in. SS
TUBING
STACK WALL
f—"*•» "~^ "VS"*™**.,.
mmm
-™V - >-ji___j—?
INSULATION
EMPERATUR
CONTROLLER
°| NEEDLE
VALVE
HEATED
[EFLON LINE
HEATED GAS
SAMPLING VALVE
SNGC
AUDIT
SAMPLE
EM
CHARCOAL
ADSORBER
FLOWMETER
PUMP
TO GC INSTRUMENT
CARRIER IN
Figure k.J. Direct interface sampling system.
TJ a en
o p a>
(ft ft O
n> a>
-------
Section No. 3-16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 16
1.1.9 and the pretest calibration of the apparatus is presented in Subsection
2.2.1.
Following are the procedures recommended for extracting a sample from the
stack, diluting the gas to the proper level, transporting the sample through a
heated sample line, and introducing it to the heated sample loop and the GC. The
analysis of the sample is described in Subsection 5.0.
1. Assemble the apparatus by connecting the heated box, as shown in Figure
4.8, between the heated sample line from the probe and the gas sampling
valve on the ehromatograph. . Vent the source gas from the gas sampling
valve directly to the charcoal filter, eliminating the pump and rotameter.
2. Measure the stack temperature, and adjust all heating units to a temper-
ature 0°C to 3°C above this temperature. If the temperature is above the
safe operating temperature of the Teflon components, adjust the heating to
maintain a temperature high enough to prevent condensation of water and
organic compounds.
3. After the heaters have come to the proper temperature, connect a U-tube H20
manometer or eqivalent to the inlet of the probe. Turn on the pump and pull
a vacuum of about 10 in. of H20. Shut off the needle valve and then turn
off the pump. The vacuum reading should remain stable for 30 seconds. If a
leak is present, repair and then recheck the system.
4. Verify operation of the dilution system by introducing a calibration gas at
the inlet of the probe. The diluted calibration gas should be within 10% of
the calculated value. If the results for the diluted calibration gas are
not within 10% of the expected values, determine whether the GC and/or the
dilution system is in error. If the analyses are not within acceptable
limits because of the dilution system, correct it to provide the proper
dilution factors. Make this correction by diluting a high concentration
standard gas mixture to adjust the dilution ratio as required.
5. Verify the GC operation using a low concentration standard by diverting the
gas into the sample loop and bypassing the dilution system as described in
Subsection 5-l« If these analyses are not within acceptable limits, correct
the GC by recalibration, etc.
6. Conduct the analyses of the two audit samples as described in Subsection
8.1 using either the dilution system or directly connect the gas sampling
valve as required. The results must agree within 10# of the true value or
greater value if specified on the cylinder. If the results do not agree,
repair the system and repeat the analyses until agreement is met or until
approval is given by the representative of the Administrator.
7. After the dilution system and GC operations are properly verified and the
audit successfully completed, place the probe at the centroid of the duct
or at a point no closer to the walls than 1 meter, and purge the sampling
system for at least 10 minutes at the proper flow rate. Conduct the analy-
sis of the sample as described in Subsection 5.0. Record the field and
analytical data on the applicable data forms (Figures 4.2 and 5-l)« Ensure
that the probe, dilution system, and sample lines are maintained at 0°C to
3°C above the stack temperature (or a temperature which prevents conden-
sation) .
8. Conduct the posttest calibration and verification of the dilution system as
described in Subsection 5.0.
If the dilution system is used for bag sampling, the procedures for verifying
operation of the dilution system will be the same as shown above. The diluted
calibration gas will be collected in a bag and then verified. Also the audit
samples will be collected in a bag and analyzed. Acceptable results must be
o
o
-------
Vent to Charcoal Adsorbers
Heated Line
from Probe
Quick
Connect
Quick
Connects to
Gas Sample
Valve
Source
Gas Pump
1.5L/Min
150 cc/Min
Pump
150 cc/Min
Pump
3-Way
Valves
in 100:1
Position
Check Valve
Quick Connects
for Calibration
Flowmeters
(On Outside
of Box)
Flow Rate of
1350 cc/Min
Heated Box at 120° C or Source Temperature
U
•ti o (/>
P p 0>
m rt o
(0 (0 rt
To Heated GC Sampling Valve
C
CD
OJ
o
Figure 4.8. Schematic diagram of the heated box required for
dilution interface sampling.
uo
v£> O\
co.
co-e-
-------
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 18 S~\
obtained for the audit samples prior to analysis of the field samples. >—'
4.3.8 Adsorption Tube Sampling - Adsorption tube sampling can be used for those
organics specified in the Method Highlights Section, Table B, and for other com-
pounds as specified in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) methods. The selection and use of adsorption tubes must be validated in
the laboratory as discussed in Subsections 3-3 and 3-4 or through the use of the
literature. This check will include selecting the proper adsorption material, and
then checking the capacity, breakthrough volume, adsorption efficiency, and desorp-
tion efficiency. The adsorption efficiency can be greatly affected by the presence
of water vapor and other organics in, and temperature of the stack gas. If sam-
pling is conducted for more than one organic compound, the adsorption and desorp-
tion efficiency checks must consider each. Because changes in process and control
equipment conditions can greatly affect all of the parameters stated above, it is
recommended as a standard operating procedure that more than one adsorption tube be
used. The first tube is analyzed as described in Subsection 5.0. If no problems
are found, then the second tube can be discarded. If problems with the first
tube's adsorption efficiency are discovered, then the primary section of the second
tube can still be analyzed and the results included with those of the primary
portion of the first tube.
Following are the recommended procedures for adsorption tube sampling:
1. The sampling system is assembled as shown in Figure 4.9- The adsorption
tube(s) must be maintained in a vertical direction for sampling. This is
done to prevent channeling of the gases along the side of a tube. It is
recommended that the sampling probe be eliminated when possible. If a /*""\
sample probe is used, it should be cleaned prior to its initial use with f J
the extraction solvent. Teflon tubing should be used for the probe and ^—
sample line.
2. Just prior to sampling, break off the ends of the adsorption tubes to
provide an opening at least one-half of the internal diameter. Audit
samples must be collected on the adsorption tubes during the test program
as described in Subsection 8.0. Since on-site analysis is typically not
conducted when using adsorption tubes, it is recommended that two samples
be collected from each of the two audit cylinders. This allows the tester
a second chance to obtain the proper value for each audit cylinder.
3. Prior to sampling and the collection of the audit samples, the sampling
system must be leak checked by connecting a U-tube H20 manometer or
equivalent to the inlet of the sample probe or adsorption tube. Turn the
pump on and pull a vacuum of about 10 in. of H20. Shut off the needle
valve and then turn off the pump. The vacuum must remain stable for 30
seconds. If a leak is present, repair and recheck the system.
4. If the flow rate in the duct varies by more than 10% during the sampling
period, the sample should be collected proportionally. The proportional
sampling procedures will be the same as described for the bag sampling. The
only difference is that instead of using the volume of the bag as the
limiting factor to determine the average sampling rate, the breakthrough
volume is the limiting factor. If the source is a constant rate source
(less than a 1Q% change in flow rate for the sampling period), the samples
can be collected at a constant rate.
5. Prepare the field blank just prior to sampling. The field blank will be
handled in be same manner as the field samples and should be from the same /"""N
lot as the other adsorption tubes. I }
6. The flow rate meter must have been calibrated in the laboratory prior to
-------
Probe
Supplemental
Adsorption
Tube
(as required)
Rotameter
Soap Bubble
Rowmeter
(for calibration)
A*
Sonic
Orifice
"o a en
CD fa n>
Oft} rt O
fl> CD ct
H-
M e_, o
vo C 3
Figure 4.9. Adsorption tube sampling system.
O
- CO
vo crv
co •
004=-
-------
Section No. 3• 16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 20
the field trip as described in Subsection 2.1. The volume of sample coll-
ected must be accurately known for adsorption tube sampling.
7. The sample run time must be equal to or greater than that specified by the
applicable regulation. During each sample run, the data should be recorded
on the sample data form {Figure 4.3 or equivalent).
8. At the conclusion of each run, conduct another leak check as described
above. If the system does not pass the leak check, the run should be
rejected, the leak located and repaired, and another run conducted.
9. After completing a successful leak check, remove the adsorption tube from
the holder and seal both ends with plastic caps. The tubes should be
packed lightly with padding to minimize the chance of breakage. If the
samples are to be held for an extended period of time, they should be kept
cool to reduce the amount of migration of the organic from the primary
section to the secondary section. Note: Pack the tubes separately from
bulk samples to avoid possible contamination.
10. It is recommended, that at the conclusion of the test, the sample probe (if
used) be rinsed into a 20-ml glass scintillation vial with about 5 to 10 ml
of the desorption solvent. This sample will be analyzed as a check on the
loss of the organic in the probe during sampling. If more than 10# of the
total sample collected in the adsorption tubes is present in the probe, the
samples should be rejected or the sample catch adjusted to account for the
loss. Alternatively, the probe can be rinsed after each run and the rinse
added to the desorption solvent prior to analysis.
11. At the conclusion of the test program, check all samples to ensure that
they are uniquely identified and check all data sheets to ensure that all
data has been recorded.
G
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 21
WATER VAPOR CONTENT
Method 4
Reference Method conducted in proper manner (Handbook Section 3»3. Method
4, Figure 4.1)
Wet Bulb/Dry Bulb
Temperature readings taken when stabilized
WB Temp °C (°F) DB Temp °C (°F)
DIRECT OR DILUTION BAG SAMPLING
Apparatus
Pitot tube: Type S Other , Properly attached
Pressure gauge: Manometer Other , Sensitivity
Probe liner: Borosilicate Stainless steel .. . Teflon
Clean , Probe heater (if applicable) on Glass wool filter
(if applicable) in place Stainless steel or Teflon unions used
to connect to sample line
Sample line: Teflon , Cleaned , Heated (if applicable)
Bag: Tedlar Other , Blank checked , Leak checked
Reactivity check , Retention check
Flowmeter: Proper range , Heated (if applicable) , Calibrated
Pump: Teflon coated diaphram , Positive displacement pump ,
Evacuated canister , Personnel pump
Heated box with temperature control system: Maintained at proper temperature
Charcoal adsorption tube to adsorb organic vapors: Sufficent capacity
Dilution equipment: N2 gas , Hydrocarbon-free air , Cleaned and
dried ambient air , Dry gas meter
Barometer: Mercury , Aneroid , Other
Stack and ambient temperature: Thermometer , Thermocouple ,
Calibrated
Procedures
Recent calibration (if applicable): Pitot tube , Flowmeter ,
Positive displacement pump* , Dry gas meter* , Thermometer
Thermocouple , Barometer
Sampling technique: Indirect bag , Direct bag , Explosion risk bag
Dilution bag , Heated syringe , Adsorption tube ,
Proportional rate , Constant rate , Direct interface
Dilution interface
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
Figure 4.10. On-site measurements checklist.
-------
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 22 S~\
Figure 4.10 (Continued)
Filter end of probe (if applicable) and pitot tube placed at centroid of duct (or
no closer than 1 meter to stack wall) and sample purged through the probe and
sample lines* .
Vacuum line attached to sample bag and system evacuated until the flowmeter
indicates no flow (leakless)*
Heated box (if applicable) same temperature as duct*
Velocity pressure recorded and sample flow set
Proportional rate sampling maintained during run*
Stack temperature, barometric pressure, ambient temperature, velocity pressure
at regular intervals, sampling flow rate at regular intervals, and initial and
final sampling times recorded*
At conclusion of run, pump shut off, sample line and vacuum line disconnected
and valve on bag closed
Heated box (if applicable) maintained at same temperature as duct until analysis
conducted
No condensation visible in bag*
Sample bag and its container protected from the sunlight
Audit gases collected in bags using sampling system*
Explosive area bag sampling: (with following expections same as above)
Pump is replaced with an evacuated canister or sufficient additional line is added
between the sample bag container and the pump to remove the pump from the
explosive area
Audit gases collected in bags using sampling system*
Prefilled bag: Proportional rate Constant rate
Dilution factor determined to prevent condensation* ____
Proper amount of inert gas metered into bag through a properly calibrated dry gas
meter*
Filter end of probe (if applicable) and pitot tube placed at centroid of duct (or
no closer than 1 meter to stack wall) and sample purged through the heated probe,
heated sample line, and heated flowmeter or positive displacement pump*
Leak checked and partially filled bag attached to sample line
Stack temperature, barometric pressure, ambient temperature, velocity pressure at
regular intervals, sampling rate at regular intervals, and initial and final sam-
pling times recorded*
Probe, sample line, and properly calibrated flowmeter or positive displacement pump
maintained at the stack temperature*
Sampling conducted at the predetermined rate, proportionally or constant for entire
run*
No condensation visible in probe, sample lines, or bag*
At conclusion of run, pump shut off, sample line disconnected and valve on bag
closed
Sample bag and its container protected from sunlight
Audit gases collected in bags using dilution system*
o
Sample Recovery and Analysis
(As described in "Postsampling operations checklist," Figure 5-10)
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 23
Figure 4.10 (Continued)
DIRECT AND DILUTION INTERFACE
Apparatus
Probe: Stainless steel , Glass , Teflon , Heated system (if
applicable) , Checked
Heated sample line: Checked*
Thermocouple readout devise for stack and sample line: Checked*
Heated gas sample valve: Checked*
Leakless Teflon-coated diaphram pump: Checked*
Flowmeter: Suitable range
Charcoal adsorber to adsorb organic vapors
Gas chromatograph and calibration standards (as shown in "Postsampling operations
checklist," Figure 5-10)*
For dilution interface sampling only:
Dilution pump: Positive displacement pump or calibrated flowmeter with Teflon-
coated diaphram pump checked*
Valves: Two three-way attached to dilution system
Flowmeters: Two to measure dilution gas, checked*
Heated box: Capable of maintaining 120°C and contains three pumps, three-way
valves, and connections, checked*
Diluent gas and regulators: N2 gas , Hydrocarbon-free air , Cleaned air _,
Checked
Procedures
All gas chromatograph procedures shown in "Postsampling operations checklist"
(Figure 5-10)
Recent calibration: Thermocouples , Flowmeter , Dilution system
(for dilution system only)*
Filter end of heated probe placed at centroid of duct (or no closer than 1 meter to
, stack wall), probe and sample line heat turned on and maintained at a temperature
of 0°C to 3°C above the source temperature while purging stack gas
Gas chromatograph calibrated while sample line purged*
After calibration, performance audit conducted and acceptable*
Sample line attached to GC and sample analyzed after thorough flushing*
With probe removed from stack for 5 min, ambient air or cleaned air analysis is
less than 5# of the emission results*
Probe placed back in duct and duplicate analysis of next calibration conducted
until acceptable agreement obtained*
All samples, calibration mixtures, and audits are analyzed at the same pressure
through the sample loop*
Sample Analysis
(As shown in "Postsampling operations checklist," Figure 5-10)
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
-------
Figure 4.10 (Continued)
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 24 ^^^
If a dilution system is used, check the following:
With the sample probe, sample line, and dilution box heating systems on, probe and
source thermocouple inserted into stack and all heating systems adjusted to a
temperature of 0°C to 3°C above the stack temperature
The dilution system's dilution factor is verified with a high concentration gas of
known concentration (within 10%)
The gas chromatograph operation verified by diverting a low concentration gas into
sample loop
The same dilution setting used throughout the run
The analysis criteria is the same shown as for the direct interface and in the
"Postsampling operations checklist," Figure 5-10
ADSORPTION TUBES
Apparatus
Probe: Stainless steel , Glass , Teflon , Heated
system and filter (if applicable)
Silica gel tube or extra adsorption tube used prior to adsorption tube when
moisture content is greater than 3 percent
Leakless sample pump calibrated with limiting (sonic) orifice or flowmeter
Rotameter to detect changes in flow
Adsorption tube: Charcoal (800/200 mg), Silica gel (1040/260 mg) S~*\
Stopwatch to accurately measure sample time f j
Procedures
Recent calibration of pump and flowmeter with bubble meter
Extreme care is taken to ensure that no sample is lost in the probe or sample line
prior to the adsorption tube
Pretest leak check is acceptable (no flow indicated on meter)
Total sample time, sample flow rate, barometric pressure, and ambient temperature
recorded ._
Total sample volume commensurate with expected concentration and recommended sample
loading factors
Silica gel tube or extra adsorption tube used prior to adsorption tube when
moisture content is greater than 3 percent
Posttest leak check and volume rate meter check is acceptable (no flow indicated on
meter, posttest calculated flow rate within 5 percent of pretest flow rate)
Sample Analysis
(As shown in the "Postsampling operations checklist," Figure
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
o
-------
Section No. 3
Date June 30,
Page 25
1988
Table 4.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
Characteris tic
Preliminary de-
terminations
and measure-
ments
Acceptance limits
If final results on
concentration basis,
determine the mois-
ture content of stack
gas
If final results on
emission rate basis,
determine moisture
content and flow
rate of stack gas
If process has >10%
variation in APave,
sampling must be con-
ducted proportionally
If preliminary survey
or information showed
a heating system nec-
essary for sampling,
determine stack gas
temperature, Ts
Determine stack
dimensions
Select sampling time
minimum total
sampling time in •>
applicable emission
standard; number or
minutes between
readings should be an
integer
Frequency and method
of measurement
Once each field test;
use wet bulb/dry bulb
thermometer, Method 4,
or sling psychrometer
See above for moisture
content; for flow
rate, once each field
test using Method 1
location, if possible,
and Method 2 proce-
dures
Determine before
test by measuring
APave and range of
fluctuation; if re-
quired, use APave and
AP measured during
sampling to vary
sampling flow rate to
sample proportionally
• Prior to and during
sampling
Prior to sampling,
using tape measure
Prior to sampling
Action if
requirements
are not met
Complete
Complete
Complete or
repeat sampling
Complete or
repeat sampling
Complete
Complete
(Continued)
-------
Table 4.1 (Continued)
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 26
o
Characteristic
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Evacuated con-
tainer sampling
1. Assemble system
using Fig. 4.4;
leakage
no
2. Minimum vacuum
of 10 in. of H20;
stable for 30 s
3. Heating system, if
used, between 0°
and 3°C above
4. Locate probe tip
at centroid of
stack or no closer
than 1 meter to
walls of stack
5. Purge probe and
sample system,
5 times system
volume or 10
minutes , which-
ever is greater
6. Sample propor-
ionally based on
APove and moni-
tored AP
Before sample collec-
tion, visually and
physically inspect
all connections
Before sample collec-
tion; use a
filled U-tube
manometer or equiva-
lent
Confirm prior to and
monitor during sam-
pling using tempera-
ture sensor(s)
Prior to sampling;
determine using stack
dimensions
Before sample collec-
tion; with bag
unattached, turn on
pump
Throughout sampling
Check for leaks,
repair system;
repeat check
Check system
for leaks;
check pump,
joints, and
valves for source
of leak; repair
and recheck
Adjust heating
system
Reposition
O
Repeat purge
Repeat test
Direct pump
sampling
(Continued)
Assemble system
using Fig. 4.5;
sample exposed
components of
Teflon, stain-
less steel, etc;
no leakage
Before sample col-
lection, visually
and physically in-
spect all equipment
and connections
Check for leaks,
repair system;
replace inappro-
priate components
O
-------
Table 4.1 (Continued)
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 27
Characteristic
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Direct pump
sampling (cont)
2. Follow steps 2-6
for evacuated bag
sampling
As above
As above
Explosion risk
area bag
sampling
1. Assemble system,
Figure 4.6 is one
option; no elec-
trical compo-
nents in explo-
sion risk area;
no leakage
2. Leak check as
above outside
explosion risk
area
3« Purge probe with
a hand squeeze
pump changing
volume at least
5 times
4. Follow steps 4
and 6 for evac-
uated bag samp-
ling
5. Clear all oper-
ations in writ-
ing through
Plant Safety
Officer
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
As above
Prior to working
in explosion risk
area
Complete
Prefilled bag
sampling
(Continued)
1. Assemble system
using Fig. 4.5;
need calibrated
flowraeter in-line
2. Calculate accept-
able dilution
factor
3. Leak check bag
As above for
evacuated bag
sampling
Prior to sampling
Prior to filling
As above for
evacuated bag
sampling
Complete
Repair or replace
-------
Table 4.1 (Continued)
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 28
o
Characteristic
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Prefilled bag
sampling (cont)
4. Fill bag with
known volume of
inert gas
5. Leak check system
at stack temper-
ature , minimum
vacuum of 10 in.
of H20, stable
for 30 s
6. Follow steps 3~6
for evacuated bag
sampling
7. Determine volume
of gas sampled
accurately
Prior to sampling;
use calibrated dry gas
meter or mass flow-
meter
Before sample collec-
tion without bag
attached; use U-tube
H20-filled manometer
or equivalent
As above
During sample collec-
tion; use flowmeter
or metering pump (max.
dilution 10 to 1) or
heated syringe, (see
below (max. dilution
50 to 1)
Complete
Locate leak,
repair or
replace compo-
nents , and
recheck
As above
Complete
O
Heated syringe
sampling -
direct injec-
tion
1. Check syringes
for compound re-
tention and re-
action
2. Seal port to pre-
vent inleakage
of ambient air
3- Place needle in
stack at sample
point, pull and
discharge sample
volume three
times
See Subsection 1.0
Visually check
Prior to sampling
Complete
Reseal and re
check
Complete
(Continued)
O
-------
Table 4.1 (Continued)
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 29
Characteris tic
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Heated syringe
sampling - dir-
ect injection
(cont)
Seal after pull-
ing sample vol-
ume, return to
heating system,
if necessary;
monitor heating
system tempera-
ture
Choose sample
volumes to sample
proportionally;
monitor AP, if
necessary (>10#
change in flow
over sampling
period)
Take second and
third syringe
samples at equal
time intervals
spanning the
required sampling
time in applica-
ble emission
standard
For each sample
collection; use
temperature sensor
Complete
During sample collec-
tion; use pitot tube
Repeat sampling
During field test
Repeat sampling
Heated syringe
sampling -
dilution
method
(Continued)
1. Follow same steps
as for heated
syringe - direct
injection, except
prefill bag (see
steps 2-4 in pre-
filled bag samp-
ling) and inject
gas in heated
syringe through
bag septum
As above
As above
-------
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 30
Table
(Continued)
o
Characteristic
Acceptance limits
'Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Direct interface
sampling
1. Assemble system
using Fig. 4.7;
no leakage
2. Heating system
between 0° and
3°C above T
3. Set flow rate at
1 L/min
4. Leak check system
at stack temper-
ature at minimum
vacuum of 10 in.
of H20; stable
for 30 s
5. Calibrate system;
duplicate analy-
ses within 5% of
their mean
6. Analyze audit
cylinders;
results within
10% of true value
7. Follow steps 4
and 5 of evacu-
ated bag
sampling
8. Analyze samples
and conduct
posttest
calibration
Before sample collec-
tion visually and
physically inspect
all connections
Confirm prior to and
monitor during
sampling using temper-
ature sensors
Prior to sampling
During sampling; use
a U-tube H20 mano-
meter or equivalent
See Subsection 5«0
See Subsection 8.0
As above
See Subsection 5-0
Check for leaks;
repair system;
repeat check
Adjust
Complete
Check system for
for leaks; repair
and recheck
Identify
problems; recal-
ibrate and check
Reject samples
and rerun test
As above
Complete
O
(Continued)
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 31
Table 4.1 (Continued)
Characteristic
Dilution inter-
face sampling
Acceptance limits
1. Follow all steps
.. for direct inter-
face sampling
with addition
of steps below
2. Assemble with
dilution system
in line, see
Figure 4.8
3. If Teflon com-
ponents cannot
withstand stack
temperature,
heating system
should be set to
prevent conden-
sation
4. Verify dilution
system to within
10# of expected
value
Frequency and method
of measurement
As above
As above
Prior to and during
sampling
Prior to sampling; use
a calibration gas
Action if
requirements
are not met
As above
As above
Adjust
Pinpoint problen
to dilution
system or QC;
repair and
recheck; adjust
dilution, if
necessary
Adsorption tube
sampling
i. Assemble system
using Figure 4.9
2. Break off ends of
adsorption tubes;
maintain in ver-
tical position
for sampling
3. Follow step 4 for
direct interface
for leak check
Before sample coll-
ection, visually and
physically check all
connections
Just prior to samp-
ling; during sampling
As above
Check for leaks,
repair, and
recheck
Complete and
check
As above
(Continued)
-------
Table 4.1 (Continued)
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 32
o
Characteristic
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Adsorption tube
sampling (cont)
4. Conduct sampling
proportionally,
if the flow rate
varies more than
10%
5. Determine samp-
ling time, >^ re-
quirement of
applicable
emission standard
6. Run field blanks
7- Perform posttest
leak check as
above
During sampling
Repeat test
Prior to sampling
Complete
Once each set of
samples
As above
Complete
Reject sample
rerun test
• o
Sample
recovery
(Continued)
1. If applicable,
remove samples
from sampling
system
2. Protect bag samp-
les from sunlight
and maintain at a
temperature which
will prevent con-
densation
3. Analyze bag sam-
ples within two
hours of sampling
4. For adsorption
tube samples,
perform at least
one probe rinse
with desorption
solvent to con-
firm that <10% of
sample is col-
lected in probe
Following sampling
Following sampling
Complete
Complete
Following sampling
Following sampling;
analyze sample with
GC
Complete
Adjust sample
values to
account for probe
catch
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.4
Date June 30, 1988
Page 33
Table 4.1 (Continued)
Characteristic
Sample
logistics
Acceptance Limits
Properly label
all bags, contain-
ers, tubes, etc.
Record all data on
forms in Figs. 4.1,
4.2, and 4.3 and
5.1
Frequency and method
of measurement
Visually check
each sample
As above
requirements
are not met
Complete the
labeling
Complete the
data records
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 1
5.0 POSTSAMPLING OPERATIONS
The postsampling operations for Method 18 include preparation of calibration
standards appropriate for the sampling technique used, determination of desorption
efficiency and collection efficiency for adsorption tubes (if used), adsorption
tube sample preparation, sample analysis, and determination of;acceptable resolu-
tion and precision. See Subsection 3-1.5 f°r postsampling operations related to
velocity determinations and Subsection 3-3'5 for postsampling operations related to
determination of the flue gas."pr duct moisture. Figure 5-10 at the end of this
section provides a checklist for monitoring the postsampling operations. Table 5'1
at the end of the section summarizes the quality assurance activities associated
with the postsampling operations.
5.1 Preparation of Calibration Standards
Calibration standards are to be prepared prior to sample analysis following
the procedures described in the following subsections. Refer to Table E in the
Method Highlights Section for recommendations on the procedures suitable for selec-
ted compounds. Note that there are two basic types of standards, gaseous or liq-
uid; the type prepared depends on the type of sample collected. Gaseous cali-
bration standards will be needed prior to the analysis of preliminary survey sam-
ples collected in glass flasks or bags, and final samples collected in bags or by
direct and dilution interface sampling. There are three techniques for preparing
gaseous standards, depending on availability and the chemical characteristics of
the standard compound(s); gas cylinder standards may also be used directly, if the
proper concentration ranges are available. Liquid calibration standards are re-
quired for the analysis of adsorption tube samples from the preliminary survey
and/or the final sampling, as well as to determine the desorption efficiency; there
are two techniques for preparing liquid calibration standards. The concentrations
of the calibration standards should bracket the expected concentrations of the
target compound(s) at the source being tested. Specific procedures for preparing
and analyzing each type of standard are described below.
For each target compound, a minimum of three different standard concentra-
tions are required to calibrate the GC. An exception to this requirement involves
developing relative response factors for each compound to be tested as compared to
a single organic compound. Once in the field, the GC is calibrated for all target
compounds using the single organic. The validity of this procedure must be first
be proven in the laboratory prior to the test. To save time, multiple component
standards can be prepared and analyzed provided the elution order of the components
is known.
It is recommended that the linearity of the calibration curve be checked
comparing the actual concentration of the calibration standards to the concentra-
tion of the standards calculated using the standard peak areas and the linear re-
gression equation. The recommended criteria for linearity ,is for the calculated
concentration for each standard be within 7% of the actual concentration.
After establishing the GC calibration curve, an analysis of the audit cyl-
inder is performed as described in Subsection 8.1. For an instrument drift check,
a second analysis of the calibration standards and generation of a second
calibration curve is required following sample analysis. The area values for the
first and second analyses of each standard must be within 5# of their average. If
this criterion cannot be met, then the sample values obtained using the first and
second calibration curves should be averaged. In addition, if reporting such
-------
Section No. 3-16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 2
average values for the samples is warranted, an additional analysis of the audit
cylinder should be performed. The average of the audit values obtained using the
two calibration curves should be reported.
5.1.1 Commercial Gas Cylinder Mixtures - Commercial gas cylinder mixtures can be
used provided that the cylinders have been certified by direct analysis and the
proper concentrations for the emission test can be obtained. Calibrate the GC
using gas cylinders by the following procedure:
1. Secure the three cylinders xnear the GC and remove their protective caps.
Attach an appropriate regulator that is equipped with a flow control valve
to the lowest concentration standard.
2. For preliminary survey sample analysis, establish the proper GC conditions
based on the referenced conditions in Table D in the Method Highlights
Section, previous experience, or possibly, if the plant being tested has a
laboratory, the laboratory personnel. For final sample analysis, establish
the optimum GC conditions determined during the preliminary survey sample
analysis.
3. Attach a quick connect or equivalent, compatible to the connection on the
Tedlar bag or the interface sample line, to the gas sampling valve on the
GC.
k. Connect a length of Teflon tubing to the flow control valve on the regula-
tor and connect the other end, using a compatible connector, to the gas
sample valve.
5- With the gas sampling valve in the load position and the flow control valve
open, open the valve on the cylinder and adjust the pressure regulator to
deliver a flow of 100cc/min through the sample loop, determined by a rota-
meter or other flow sensing device on the loop outlet.
6. Allow the sample loop to be flushed for 30 seconds, then turn off the flow
control valve.
7. Allow the sample loop to return to the same pressure that will be exper-
ienced during sample analysis, determined with a manometer or equivalent
connected to a tee on the outlet of the loop, and immediately switch the
valve to the inject position.
8. Note the time of the injection on the strip chart recorder and/or actuate
the electronic integrator. Also, record the standard concentration, detec-
tor attenuation factor, chart speed, sample loop temperature, column tem-
perature and identity, and the carrier gas type and flow rate on the data
form shown in Figure 5-l» It is also recommended that the same information
be recorded directly on the chromatogram. Record the operating parameters
for the particular detector being used.
9- After the analysis, determine the retention time of each standard component
and determine the peak area. Repeat the injection of the first cylinder gas
standard until the area counts from two consecutive injections are within 5
percent of their average.
10. Multiply the average area count of the consecutive injections by the atten-
uation factor to get the calibration area value for that standard concen-
tration. NOTE: Attenuation factors which affect the plot traced, but not
the area count returned by an electronic integrator should not be
multiplied by the average area count. Observe the effect of attenuation
changes made at the console of a specific electronic integrator to
determine the appropriate course of action.
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 3
Analysis of Method 18 Field Samples
/&& Analyst: JT
Date:
Location:
Type of Calibration Standard:
Number of Standards: 3 Date Prepared:
Plant:
Sample Type:
Target Compound:
Prepared By: A-
OC Used: HP
Column Used: Ps>i
Calibration Data
First analysis/second analysis
Standard concentration (Cact)
Flow rate through loop (ml/min)
Liquid injection volume (tubes)
Injection time (24-hr clock)
Chart speed (cm/min)
Detector attenuation
Peak retention time (min)
Peak retention time range (min)
Peak area
Peak area x attenuation factor
Average peak area value (Y)
Percent deviation from average
Calculated concentration (Cstd)
% deviation from actual (#Dact)
Linear regression equation; slope
Sample Analysis Data
First analysis/second analysis
Sample identification
Interface dilution factor
Flow rate through loop (ml/min)
Liquid injection volume (tubes)
Injection time (24-hr clock)
Chart speed (cm/min)
Detector attenuation
Peak retention time
Peak retention time range
Peak area
Peak area x atten. factor (Aj/A2)
Average peak area value (Y)
% deviation from average (#Davg)
Calculated concentration (Cs)
(Y - b) At
m
Standard 1
/O.O
7,00! i.oc?
NA- 1 M
l4-'Oo
te> 1 /o
2-/ -Z-
2.03/2.62.
o.ol
2-I& / ZO&
43£/ 4-K*
4-1b
2.3
/0.2,
-3-0
(m): 4/.6P
Sample 1
££-/
A/A
2-<7O/ 2JOQ
V4 / AfA-
IS:Zt,l IS;W
It) I /O
2, 1 T-
1.61/Z.&3
O-°l
BOA-I t>5t>
/(tOQ/ 1 <*?<<,
KotZ.
J-.l
39.3
- Y
Y
Standard 2
30-0
Z-£>O 1 £,£>
A/ A- / A/A
/o 1 /o
Z- 1 2-
Z.£Z/ 2.6f-
O.OZ,
(,/+/ ffZ&
IZZB//i?(s
/Z.4-2.
/./
2.1.7-
-1,0
y-intercept
Sample 2
AC- 2
fi/A
2oo / ZOO
A/frl AJA-
Hr'.l&l J(*'-+3
/o 1 ID
2- / 2-
2.g//2.g3
O.toZ.
/OW,I /0?4-
jLlBZ/ ZJ4-6
-L\4o
0.4-
o
o
(b): _ o.BI
Sample 3
A £-3
Afft
2-00/2.0O
A/A-/ ASA
1 ?-:zt> I '?'•*<*>
/O / /O
z. 1 i-
2.86/2 -go
«
?ex]1i?-
/g/£j//534-
/8<2fc
0.4-
4-3.1-
_ fi
t d act
Figure 5.1. Data form for analysis of Method 18 field samples.
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 4
11. Repeat the procedure for the other standard concentrations, with the high-
est concentration analyzed last.
12. Prepare a plot with the standard concentration (Ca) along the abscissa (x-
axis) versus the corresponding calibration area value along the ordinate
(y-axis). Perform a regression analysis to calculate the slope and the y-
intercept. Draw the least squares line on the plot.
5.1.2 Preparation and Analysts of Gaseous Standards from High Concentration Cylin-
ders - Gaseous standards can be prepared from high concentration cylinder gases by
dilution with hydrocarbon-free gas and collection of the diluted gas mixture in a
Tedlar bag (10 liters or larger). A single-stage dilution system is used for
dilutions up to about 20-fold. For greater dilutions, a two-stage dilution system
should be used. It is recommended that a check of the dilution system be made by
analyzing a low concentration cylinder standard that is in the range of one of the
standards prepared by dilution. Prepare the gaseous standards, by the dilution
technique, using the procedures that follow:
1. Assemble the single-stage dilution system, as shown in Figure 5-2 and/or
the two-stage dilution system, as shown in Figure 5-3, using rotameters
(flowmeters) calibrated following the procedures described in Subsection
2.1.3- (More precise dilutions may be possible if the dilution system
utilizes mass flow controllers and mass flowmeters in place of the
rotameters.)
2. Connect the primary flowmeters on the single-stage system to the calibra-
tion gas mixture and the diluent gas (hydrocarbon-free). On the two-stage
system, connect the secondary flowmeters to the two diluent gas cylinders.
3- Connect a leakfree evacuated Tedlar bag fitted with a quick connect or
equivalent, compatible to the connection on the actual sample bags or the
interface sample line, to the tee connector on the single-stage system or
following the second stage of the two-stage system.
4. Open the gas cylinders, adjust all the pressure regulators to the same
pressure, and adjust the gas flows to achieve the desired dilution ratio
using the flow control valves. On the two-stage system, adjust the needle
valve on the high concentration waste outlet so that 9Q% of the high con-
centration gas is wasted and 10# goes to the second stage. NOTE: Divert
high concentration waste to a fume hood or pass it through an appropriate
adsorption media to protect personnel from exposure to harmful
concentrations of organic vapors.
5- Take periodic readings of the pressure difference between the first and
second stages of the two-stage system, as indicated by a water manometer or
equivalent, to correct the flow reading from the first stage to the second
stage. If the flow rates of the two stages can be balanced so that the
pressures are equal, then no correction will be necessary.
6. Disconnect the Tedlar bag from the dilution system before the bag is total-
ly full, and turn off the gases. Label the bag to indicate the contents,
the time and data when it was prepared, the identity of the high concentra-
tion gas cylinder, and the dilution ratio(s) used.
7- Record the ambient temperature, the flow meter readings, the barometric
pressure, and the average first stage pressure on the data form shown in
Figure 5.4.
8. Calculate the concentration (Cs), in ppmv, of the component in the final
gas mixture by the following formulas for 'single-stage and two-stage
dilution.
o
o
-------
COMPONENT
GAS
CYLINDER
DILUENT
GAS
CYLINDER
"T" CONNECTOR
CALIBRATED ROTAMETERS
WITH FLOW CONTROL
VALVES
"H
TEDLAR BAG
O OT
P fl>
Ct O
-------
MANOMETER
HIGH
CONCENTRATION
WASTE
NEEDLE VALVES
ROTAMETERS
LOW
£»• CONCENTRATION
GAS
DILUENT AIR
PURE SUBSTANCE OR
PURE SUBSTANCE/N, MIXTURE
Figure 5.3. Two-stage calibration gas dilution system.
13 O to
O P CD
«-i O
og:
OJ .
O
• OO
OS-
OOVJI
O
O
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 7
Preparation of Standards by Dilution of Gas Cylinder Standards
Date:
2/Z-t/
Preparer:
Purpose:
Cylinder Component :
Source:
_ _
Component Concentration (X) :
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 8
o
For single-stage dilution:
(X x qc)
Cs = Equation 5-1
where
X = Mole or volume fraction of the organic in the calibration gas
that was diluted, ppmv,
qc = Flow rate of the calibration gas that was diluted, and
qd = Diluent gas flow rate.
For two-stage dilution:
1c2 corr = <*c 2 actual X ~ ~ Equation 5-2
where
^c2 corr = Corrected flow rate from the first stage to the second stage,
qc2 actual = Actual flow rate from the first stage to the second stage,
Pd = Average differential pressure between the first and second j^*\
stage, mm or in. H20, and f j
Pb = Barometric pressure, mm or in. H20. X_x
and
"c1 ^c 2 corr
Cs = X x x Equation 5-3
(qcl * qdl) (qc2 corr + qd2)
where
X = Mole or volume fraction of the organic in the calibration gas
that was diluted,
qcl = Flow rate of the calibration gas diluted in the first stage,
qdl = Flow rate of the diluent gas in the first stage, and
qd2 = Flow rate of the diluent gas in the second stage.
9. Prepare two more calibration standards from the high concentration cylin-
der gas sufficient to bracket the expected concentration in the source
samples.
10. Analyze the calibration standards following the procedures described in
Subsection 5«1«1 for commercial gas cylinder mixtures. Use a pump on the
outlet side of the sample loop to flush the standards through the loop at
100 cc/min for 30 seconds. Using a manometer connected to a tee on the
outlet of the sample loop, make certain that the sample loop pressure
during analysis of the calibration standards is equal to the loop pressure
during actual sample analysis.
11. Once the calibration curve is established, it is recommended, if available,
that an undiluted cylinder standard in the range of the standard curve be
analyzed to verify the dilution ratio. Analyze the cylinder and calculate
the sample area value by multiplying the peak area by the attenuation
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 9
factor. Use the slope and the y-intercept derived from the linear regres-
sion equation and the sample area value to calculate the cylinder concen-
tration (Cs) by the following formula:
Y - b
C. =
Equation 5-4
where
Y = Sample peak area, area counts,
b = y-intercept of the calibration curve, area counts, and
S = Slope of the calibration curve, area counts/ppmv.
The calculated concentration of the undiluted cylinder standard, based on the
analysis and the calibration curve generated from the diluted standards, should be
within 10% of the true value of the undiluted cylinder. If this criteria cannot be
met, then the GC calibration should be checked, the diluted sample may be outside
the calibration range, or there is a problem with the dilution system used to
prepare the standards (e.g. the rotameters are out of calibration, etc.)- Identify
the problem and correct it, or use one of the other approaches for preparing cali-
bration standards.
5.1.3 Preparation of Calibration Standards by Direct Gas Injection - This proce-
dure is applicable to organic compounds that exist entirely as a gas at ambient
conditions. The standards are prepared by direct injection of a known quantity of
a "pure" gas standard into a 10-liter Tedlar bag containing 5-0 liters of hydrocar-
bon-free air or nitrogen. If there is more than one target compound then multiple
component standards can be prepared by this method provided the relative elution
pattern for the compounds is known for the GC column being used. The following
procedures are used to prepare standards by direct gas injection:
1. Evacuate a previously leak checked, leakfree 10-liter Tedlar bag (also
checked for zero retention) equipped with a quick connect or equivalent
compatible to the connection on the Tedlar bag or the interface sample line
and preferably fitted with a septum-capped tee at the bag inlet (see Figure
5-5).
2. Fit a septum to the outlet of the gas cylinder containing the standard
component.
3. Meter 5-0 liters of hydrocarbon-free air or nitrogen into the bag at a rate
of 0.5 liter/min using a dry gas meter that has been calibrated in a manner
consistent with the procedure described in Subsection 2.1.2. At the start,
record dry gas meter pressure and temperature.
4. While the bag is filling, fill and purge a 0.5-ml gas-tight syringe with
the standard gas by withdrawing the gas from the cylinder through the
septum. Repeat the fill and purge of the syringe seven times before final-
ly filling the syringe and capping the needle with a GC septum. Allow the
syringe temperature to equilibrate with the ambient temperature.
5. Immediately before injecting the gas into the bag through the septum,
remove the septum cap, and adjust the syringe to the desired volume by
expelling the excess gas. The syringe should now be at ambient pressure.
Inject the gas into the bag through the septum (through the side of the bag
if it has not been fitted with a septum), withdraw the syringe, and imme-
diately cover any resulting hole with a piece of masking tape or the equi-
valent .
-------
Nitrogen
Cylinder
Gas
Tight
Syringo
Dry Gas Motor
Soptum
TedlarBag
Capacity
10 Liters
T) O Cfl
(3 p
-------
7.
8.
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 11
Record the final dry gas meter temperature and pressure, turn off the
dilution gas, and disconnect the Tedlar bag; record the ambient
temperature and pressure on a data form such as the one shown in Figure
5.6.
Place the bag on a smooth surface, and alternatively depress opposite
sides of the bag 50 times to mix the gases in the bag.
Calculate the organic standard concentration in the bag (Cs ) in ppmv using
the following formula.
x 106
293 x ps
T x 760
P. x T
Gv x 103 x
C_ =
293
Equation 5-5
y x
x 760
103
where
Gv = Gas volume of organic compound injected into the Tedlar bag,
ml,
106 = Conversion to ppmv, ul/liter,
Ps = Absolute pressure of syringe before injection, mm Hg,
Ts = Absolute temperature of the syringe before injection, °K,
Vm = Gas volume indicated by dry gas meter, liters,
y = Dry gas meter correction factor, dimensionless,
Pm = Average absolute pressure of the dry gas meter, mm Hg,
Tm = Average absolute temperature of dry gas meter, °K, and
lO3 = Conversion factor, ml/L.
Note: The syringe pressure and absolute temperature should equal the baro-
metric pressure and the absolute ambient temperature.
9. Prepare two more calibration standards sufficient to bracket the expected
concentration in the source samples.
10. Analyze the calibration standards following the procedures described in
Subsection 5-!•! for commercial gas cylinder mixtures. Use a pump on the
outlet side of the sample loop to flush the standards through the loop at
100 cc/min for 30 seconds. Using a manometer connected to a tee on the
outlet of the sample loop, make certain that the sample loop pressure
during analysis of the calibration standards is equal to the loop pressure
during actual sample analysis.
5.1.4 Preparation of Calibration Standards by Liquid Injection - This procedure is
used to prepare gaseous standards in Tedlar bags from liquid organic compounds.
The liquid compounds used must be 99 • 9% mole pure or the purity must be known to
calculate the gaseous standard concentrations. If there is more than one target
compound, then multiple component standards can be prepared by this method provided
the relative elution pattern for the compounds is known for the GC column being
used. Use the procedure that follows to prepare standards by this technique.
1. Assemble the equipment shown in Figure 5«7 using a dry gas meter calibrated
following the procedure described in Subsection 2.1.2 and a water manometer
for the pressure gauge. All connections,should be glass, Teflon, brass or
stainless steel with quick connects or equivalent, compatible to the con-
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 12
Preparation of Standards in Tedlar Bags by Gas and Liquid Injection
o
Date:
Preparer:
Purpose: C*libr-e>hb*
held £$-/•
Organic Compound:
Compound Source:
Gas:
or Liquid:
Compouhd Purity (P) ;
Compound Mole Weight (M) : /£*>. 83
Gas Injection
Bag number or identification
Dry gas meter calibration factor ,(Y)
Final gas meter reading, liters
Initial gas meter reading, liters
Volume metered (Vm), liters
Ambient temperature, °C
Average gas meter temperature, °C
Absolute gas meter temp. (Tra), °K
Barometric pressure (Pb), mm Hg
Average gas meter pressure, mm Hg
Absolute gas meter press. (Pm), mm Hg
Gas volume injected (Gv), ml
Syringe temperature (T8), °K
Absolute syringe pressure (P ), mm Hg
Calculated concentration (Cs)
Mixture 1
T x P
1s x rra
v
Mixture 2
A//A-
Hixture 3
MM
s c a 1 c .
a c o r r .
x loo*
O
Liquid Injection
Bag number or identification
Dry gas meter calibration factor (Y)
Final gas meter reading* liters
Initial gas meter reading, liters
Volume metered (Vm ) , liters
Average gas meter temperature, °C
Absolute gas meter temp. (Tm), °K
Barometric pressure (Pb ) , mm Hg
Average gas meter pressure, mm Hg
Absolute gas meter press. (Pm), mm Hg
Liquid organic density (p) , ug/ml
Liquid volume injected (Lv), ul
Calculated concentration (Cs )
Mixture 1
S-l
17-.2&
Z-K
AS"
3->00
3-1,?-
Cs = 6.24 x 10* x
Lv x p x T0
Mixture 2
3-Z
1.10
7-.00
2,6
30!
. 4-
/.«#-
/.6.Z3
Z.00
J.4-
Mixture 3
S-3
O- 9430
ze.qo
2-6
75-6,4
/.I
2.00
/4-.S"
s caic
x 1002
M x Vm x y x Pm
Figure 5-6. Calibration data form for preparation of standards in Tedlar bags by
gas and liquid injection.
o
-------
SYRINGE
•N
s
If
NITROGEN CYLINDER
SEPTUM
MIDGET IMPINGER
-p:
TEDLAR BAG
, CAPACITY
50 LITERS
Figure 5-7- Apparatus for preparation of calibration standards by liquid
injection.
TJ O 03
to ta n>
03 rt o
(D (D ct
H-
»-» e-i O
W 3
OJ .
o
- OJ
VO O\
oo •
OOU1
-------
Section No. 3-16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 14
nection on the Tedlar bag or the interface sample line, for connection to
the Tedlar bag.
2. Allow the liquid organic compound to come to ambient temperature, and
determine the density of the liquid by weighing the liquid in a tare-
weighed ground-glass stoppered 25-ml volumetric flask or ground-glass
stoppered specific gravity bottle. Calculate the density in terms of
g/ml. As an alternative, use a literature value of the density of the
liquid at 20 °C.
3. Leak check the system by pressurizing it to 5 to 10 cm (2 to 4 in.) H20
and shutting off the diluent gas supply. The system is leakfree if there
is no change in the pressure after 30 seconds. If the leak check is
good, release the pressure. !lf the system fails the leak check, locate
the leak using a soap solution and repair the leak.
4. Connect a quick connect or equivalent, compatible to the connection on
the Tedlar bag or the interface sample line, to a leakfree uncontaminated
50-liter Tedlar bag. Evacuate the bag. " .
5. Turn on the hot plate and bring the water to a boil.
6. Connect the bag to the impinger outlet.
7. Record the initial meter reading and temperature. Open the diluent
supply valve, and adjust the flow rate to about 3 liters/minute so that
the bag will fill in about 15 minutes. Record the meter pressure and
temperature and the barometric pressure at the start on a form such as
the one shown in Figure 5-5-
8. Use a clean 1.0- or 10-microliter syringe with a needle of sufficient
length to inject the liquid below the air inlet branch of the tee on the
midget impinger.
9. Fill the syringe to the desired volume with the organic liquid, and
inject the liquid by inserting the needle through the septum until the
needle is below the air inlet. Depress the syringe plunger completely
over a period of about 10 seconds and withdraw the needle. NOTE: When
dispensing liquid from a syringe, take care to account for the volume of
liquid present in the syringe needle. In general, the potential error
resulting from the volume of the needle is most conveniently avoided by
ensuring that the needle volume is completely full of liquid upon
filling the syringe and dispensing from it. If air pockets exist in the
syringe after filling, this will be almost impossible.
10. When the bag is almost filled, record the water manometer pressure. Turn
off the diluent gas supply, and disconnect the bag. To equilibrate the
contents in the bag, either set the bag aside for an hour or massage the
bag by alternately depressing opposite sides of the bag 50 times.
11. Record the final meter reading and temperature. Calculate the con-
centration of the calibration standard (Cs) in the bag in ppmv using the
following formula.
— x p x 24.055 x 106
M Lv x p x Tn
Cs = = 6.24 x 10" x Equation 5-6
293 x Pm M x Vm x y x Pm
Vm x Y x x 103
Tm x 760
O
-------
Section No. 3-16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 15
where
Vra = Gas volume indicated by dry gas meter, liters,
Lv - Volume of liquid organic injected, ul,
M = Molecular weight of the organic compound, g/g-mole,
p = Organic liquid density, g/ml,
24.055 = Ideal molar gas volume at 293 °K and 760 mm Hg, liters/g-
mole,
106 = Conversion to ppmv, ul/liter,
103 = Conversion factor, ul/ml, and
y = Conversion factor for dry gas meter.
12. When using a liquid standard that is not 99-9# pure, use the following
formula to correct the calculated concentration of the calibration standard
(C« „„„) in ppm .
c al c
X P
Equation 5-7
where
s c or r
i
•'s c a 1 c
= Corrected calibration standard concentration, ppmv,
= Calculated calibration standard concentration (Cs), ppmv,
and
P = Purity of liquid organic compound, percent.
13. Prepare two more calibration standards sufficient to bracket the expected
concentration in the source samples.
14. Analyze the calibration standards following the procedures described in
Subsection 5»1«1 for commercial gas cylinder mixtures. Use a pump on the
outlet side of the sample loop to flush the standards through the loop at
100 cc/min for 30 seconds. Make certain that the sample loop pressure
during analysis of the calibration standards is equal to the loop pressure
during actual sample analysis.
An alternative procedure, subject to the approval of the Administrator, for
preparing gaseous standards from liquid organics substitutes a heated GC injection
port for the midget impinger setup and, due to the high back pressure of the injec-
tion port, a calibrated mass flowmeter for the dry gas meter.
5.1.5 Development of Relative Response Factors and Relative Retention Factors-
Far emission tests where on-site GC analysis involving more than one organic com-
pound will be conducted, the development and use of relative response factors and
relative retention times is recommended. In the laboratory, gaseous calibration
standards are prepared for each target organic compound and analyzed by one of the
techniques described in the previous subsections. Choose one of the target com-
pounds or prepare and generate another calibration curve for a different organic
compound to be used to calculate the relative response factors and retention times.
The compound selected should exhibit a retention time comparable to the other
target compounds, should be stable, and/or easy to prepare and use in the field.
This procedure must be verified in the laboratory prior to field testing.
The relative response factors are calculated by dividing the slopes of the
target compound calibration curve by the slope of the selected organic calibration
curve. The y-intercept from the regression equation is ignored in calculating the
relative response factors. It should be noted that a very large y-intercept
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 16
(greater than 5% of the slope) for any compound may adversely affect the validity
of this calibration technique. During analysis of field samples, the selected
organic compound can be used to calibrate the GC detector response and column
performance. The response factor determined in the field for the selected organic
is used to calculate the field response factors for the other target compounds
using the relative response factors determined previously in the laboratory. The
same approach is used to predict the retention times of target compounds in the
field using the selected compound retention time determined in the field and the
relative retention times for the target compounds determined in the laboratory. Use
the following procedures to develop relative response factors and relative reten-
tion times.
1. Generate, at the minimum, a three-point calibration curve for each target
organic compound using gaseous standards following the procedures described
in the preceding subsections. Record the retention time of each compound.
2. Select one of the target compounds, preferably with a retention time be-
tween the other target compounds, or generate another calibration curve,
with a minimum of three points, for a non-target organic compound with a
comparable retention time. Select the standard compound to be used in the
field based primarily on the ease of use. Determine the retention time of
the selected compound (if not already determined). Measure the carrier gas
flow rate using a bubble-type flowmeter or other suitable flowmeter.
3. Inject a sample of the diluent gas, and determine the retention time of the
unretained diluent peak. This is needed to calculate the relative reten-
tion by the following formula:
* "R x i
rx/s - Equation 5-8
where
rx/« = Relative retention time based on adjusted retention volumes of the
target compounds and the selected compound, cc/cc,
tRxi = Initial retention time of compound x, seconds,
tM1 = Initial retention time of unretained diluent gas peak, seconds,
and
tRgl = Initial retention time of selected organic compound, seconds.
4. Calculate the relative response factor for each target compound relative to
the compound selected in step 2 using the following formula.
FRx = — Equation 5-9
where
FRx = Relative response factor for compound x, dimensionless,
ms = Slope from the calibration curve regression equation for the
selected organic compound, area counts/ppmv, and
mx = Slope from the calibration curve regression equation for
compound x, area counts/ppm .
o
/"""N
O
-------
Section No. 3-16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 1?
To verify that the relative response factors are correct, simulate the
transportation of the GC to the field by turning off the detector, the GC
oven and the carrier gas flow overnight or longer. After the simulated
period has elapsed, turn on the GC, the carrier gas, and the detector, and
establish the analytical conditions that were used to generate the relative
response factors. Measure the carrier gas flow rate.
Recalibrate the GC by generating a three-point calibration curve using the
selected organic compound, analyze each of the target compound calibration
standards, and a diluent gas sample. Calculate the concentration of each
target compound using the relative response factor for the compound and the
slope from the new calibration curve determined for the selected organic
compound with the following formula.
x F,
Rx
Equation 5-10
m
where
s t d
= Calculated concentration of compound x calibration standard,
m
s td
= Detector response for compound x calibration standard, area
counts,
= Slope from new calibration curve generated for selected
organic standard compound, area counts/ppmv, and
^"RX = Relative response factor for compound x, dimensionless.
The calculated value for each target compound using the compound's relative
response factor must be within 5% of the actual standard concentration for
this technique to be used for that compound.
Determine the predicted retention times for the target compounds using
their relative retention times and the retention time determined for the
selected organic compound using the following formula:
T x f
= ' '
T s t
M f
Equation 5"
where
Txf
?sf
Calculated retention time for compound x using the relative
retention time factor, seconds,
Measured retention for selected organic compound during
second analysis , seconds , and
tMf = Measured retention time of unretained diluent gas peak during
second analysis, seconds.
The calculated retention time for the target compounds should agree within
one second or 2%, whichever is greater, of the actual retention time seen
for the target compounds during the second analysis.
8. Record all data on a form such as the one shown in Figure 5-8.
5-1.6 Calibration Standards for Adsorption Tube Samples - The calibration stan-
dards necessary for the analysis of adsorption tube samples differ from the stan-
dards described in the previous subsections in that the adsorption tube standards
are liquid rather than gaseous. The liquid standards can be prepared directly in
the desorption solvent following the procedures described in the methods refer-
enced in Table F or, subject to the approval of the Administrator, on blank adsorp-
-------
. Section No. 3-16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 18
Development of Relative Response Factors and Relative Retention Factors
o
Date: ^-/Z-k /6& Preparer: \7- C?oo
Target Compound: Perch 1 or o eft** Lu/^J-.
Surrogate Compound: -Lsotyui^*^-
Target Compound Calibration Data
First analysis/verify analysis
Standard concentration .uL. '
Flow rate through loop (ml/min)
Liquid injection volume (tubes)
Injection time (24-hr clock)
Chart speed
Detector attenuation
Peak retention time (tRxi/tRxf)
Peak retention time range
Peak area
Peak area x atten. factor (Yi/Yx
Verification analysis conc.(Cx)
Percent deviation from actual
Calculated retention time (rTxf)
Percent deviation from actual
Linear regression equation; slope
Surrogate Calibration Data
First analysis/second analysis
Standard concentration
Flow rate through loop (ml/min)
Liquid injection volume (tubes)
Injection time (24-hr clock)
Chart speed
Detector attenuation
Peak retention time (tRsl/tRsf)
Peak retention time range
Peak area
Peak area x attenuation factor
fJrSc-1^- Purpose
Type of Standard
Type of Standard
Standard 1
_^.05>^
T.OO! tCQ
/V/f- / /l/4
)4'.CO/ /4:3'
/O&H/P'l*/ 10
Z. 1 -z-
/Z..43/ 2.,4-S
O.02-
39.3 / 34^
) 74O / (#2,
?. l^"
—l/,t%
2..4-Z
-0.07,
(mx): 73.38
Standard 1
/o-o,^
JLOO/^ 3JJO
f/A-l tifi
I4:oi/ /4-:2Lfc
ijfc / * / tD
1 1 }
'Z.ldl 3.2£>
O.O2-
7^3 / ^f
*7fc 3 / ?(**}
Linear regression equation; slope (m0 ) : <74-39 (m, ):
Nonretained peak retention time (tM1
Relative Response Factor (FRK): /. 2
/tnf): O.t\ /O.
•J- Relative Retei
: UUL Q>»™™*H«
: l-lquitl ,'r> B»Q
: C^ds Cif lt'ndJ&-
'
Standard 2
67.7-
2-OO / zoo
A/A-/ MAr
f5:t>*>/ /5".'4O
10 1 10
2. 1 2.
2.. 44 1 2, 4-5"
0.03
Wit/ /?&3
3 62^/39 2 4-
5-2.4-
+1.4
3..4-1-
O.(f7»
y-intercept (b)
Standard 2
SO-O^M
000/2^70
AJ fir/ fit A
/4,1 &/ /S'12,
/o //o
/ / 1
3.27/3.2.6
O.Ol
3-7&(o/ 3-W4-
!-•?(,&/ j-j-q 4-
&v*i't>L>(* rntxjiz
Standard 3
Z.QO! 2-QD
A/A- 1 A/-4
/4 .'/B//^:^
10/10
2-1 2-
Z.4-4/ 3,4-Z-
0.02.
?>(f52l $(e(*1e>
73o<-/7332-
-/.4
2.4-1.
0>(e"?t>
: lO.^tf
Standard 3
/CO ff>H\
300/2.00
/JAJ X/A
l^'All tb'&l
/O 1 /f
2.1 2-
3.11 / S.1(f
O-OI
4?l(p/4?£2-
1432./ VSO*
9£~./0 y-intercept (b) : -/6.0C
43
ntion Factor (rx/
,.): 0.1-
O
-x/s
'Txf
- tM.)
i - tM1)
x F,
Rx
m
s t d
f) x rx/s) + t,
"Mf
O
Figure 5-8. Data form for development of relative response and relative retention
factors.
'T>'.-,
-------
Section No. 3-16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 19
tion tubes and then desorbed. Both methods require similar preparation and analy-
sis of standards and desorption efficiency samples, but the way the calibration
curve is generated is different.
For calibration standards prepared directly in the desorption solvent, the
standards are used to generate the calibration curve, and the desorption efficiency
is determined separately. The calculated desorption efficiency is then used to
correct the analytical results for the emission test samples. The disadvantage of
this method is that the desorption efficiency may not be constant for each level.
This can result from a constant amount of analyte being retained by the adsorbent,
instead of an amount proportional to the total amount of analyte on the adsorbent.
When using the desorption efficiency to correct each analytical result, the analyst
must use the desorption efficiency determined for the concentration level closest
to that of the sample.
For calibration standards prepared on absorbent material, the desorbed solu-
tions are used to generate the calibration curve. By this procedure, the desorp-
tion efficiency is already taken into account when calculating the organic compound
catch of the adsorption tube samples. Liquid calibration standards must also be
prepared to calibrate the GC to determine if the desorption efficiency is greater
than 50#. The advantage of this method is that both level-dependent or absolute
amounts of organic compounds not desorbed from the adsorbent are automatically
taken into consideration.
For maximum accuracy, preparation of standards directly in the desorption
liquid or on adsorbent will require the preparation of a relatively large volume of
a high concentration working standard from which the calibration standards are
prepared. The working standard should be 100 times more concentrated than the
highest concentration calibration standard. Three levels of calibration standards
should be prepared to bracket the expected concentration of the liquid resulting
from desorption of actual samples. The concentration of the sample desorption
liquid will depend on the catch weight of the target organic compound(s) and the
amount of desorption liquid used (1.0 ml per 100 mg of adsorbent material). The
catch weight will in turn depend on the sample volume of flue or duct gas drawn
through the tubes and the concentration of the emission source. Use the following
formula to estimate the concentration (Cs), in ug/ml, of the midrange liquid stan-
dard that will be approximately equal to the actual samples:
Vpr«. X Cc X M
Cs = Equation 5-12
24.055 x Ld
where
Vpred = Predicted gas sample volume, liters,
Cc = Concentration of the organic compound at the source, ppmv
(ug-moles/g-mole),
M = Molecular weight of organic compound, ug/ug-mole,
24.055 = Ideal molar gas volume at 293 °K and 760 mm Hg, liters/g-mole, and
Ld = Volume of desorption liquid, ml.
The preliminary survey sample results should be used to calculate the required
calibration standard concentrations.
To prepare adsorption tube standards, use the procedure described in the refer-
enced method or the alternative procedure, subject to the prior approval of the
Administrator. Regardless of which type of calibration standard is selected, use
the following procedures to prepare the standards:
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 20
1. Prepare a working standard for each organic compound by weighing each com-
pound into an individual tare-weighed ground-glass stoppered 250-inl volume-
tric flask. Dissolve the compound in the proper desorption solvent speci-
fied by the referenced method in Table E of the Method Highlights Section.
Dilute the solution to volume. Refrigerate the working standard when not
being used.
2. Using a clean microliter syringe, transfer the required amount of working
standard to a vial equipped with a Teflon-lined septum top, and add suffi-
cient desorption solvent to achieve a final volume equal to the volume of
desorption solvent required for actual samples. Cap the vial with the
top, shake the vial to mix the contents. NOTE: When dispensing liquid from
a syringe, take care to account for the volume of liquid present in the
syringe needle. In general, the potential error resulting from the volume
of the needle is most conveniently avoided by ensuring that the needle
volume is completely full of liquid upon filling the syringe and dispensing
from it. If air pockets exist in the syringe after filling, this will be
almost impossible.
3- Establish the optimum GC conditions determined during the analysis of the
preliminary survey samples.
4. Select a suitably sized injection syringe (5- or 10-ul), and flush the
syringe with acetone (or some other suitable solvent if acetone is the
standard component) to clean the syringe.
5. Flush the syringe with standard solution by withdrawing a syringe full of
the solution from the septum vial, and dispensing the solution into a
beaker containing charcoal adsorbent.
6. Refill the syringe with standard solution, withdraw the syringe from the
vial, and wipe the syringe needle with a laboratory tissue.
7. Adjust the syringe volume down to the desired amount (see NOTE under Step
2), and inject into the GC. Note the time of the injection on the strip
chart recorder and/or actuate the electronic integrator. Also, record the
standard concentration, detector attenuation factor, chart speed, injection
port temperature, column temperature and identity, and the carrier gas type
and flow rate on the form shown in Figure 5-9- It is also recommended that
the same information be recorded directly on the chromatogram. Record the
operating parameters for the particular detector being used.
8. After the analysis, determine the retention time of the standard component
and determine the peak area. Repeat the injection of the first liquid
standard until the area count from two consecutive injections yield area
counts within 5 percent of their average.
9. Multiply the average area count of the consecutive injections by the atten-
uation factor to get the calibration area value for that standard concen-
tration .
10. Repeat the procedure for the other standard concentrations.
11. Prepare a plot with the standard concentration (Cs) along the abscissa (x-
axis) versus the corresponding calibration area values along the ordinate
(y-axis). Perform a regression analysis to calculate the slope and the y-
intercept. Draw the least squares line on the plot.
To determine the desorption efficiency for the target organic compound(s)
requires spiking the target organic compound(s) onto the absorbent material and
desorbing the compound(s) using the same procedures that will be used for actual
samples; the desorption solution is then analyzed. The spikes should be prepared
at three levels in the range of the source samples. The following procedures are
used to determine the desorption efficiency:
o
o
o
-------
8
Section No. 3-16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 21
1. Place an amount of adsorbent material equivalent to the amount used for
actual tube samples in a vial with a Teflon-lined septum cap. Prepare ten
vials (three sets of triplicates and one blank).
2. Using a clean microliter syringe, aliquot from the working standard solu-
tion, in triplicate into each set of vials, an amount of spike equal to
each level of calibration standard.
3- Cap each vial immediately after spiking, and allow the vials to sit undi-
sturbed for the 30 minutes.
4. To desorb the ".spiked organic compound(s), dispense the appropriate volume
of desorbent solvent and treat the vials as specified by the referenced
method (Table E). Prepare a blank vial containing adsorbent and desorption
solvent only.
5- Analyze the desorption solutions following steps 4 through 8 used above for
the calibration standards. Record the data on the form shown in Figure
5-9.
6. Multiply the average area count of the consecutive injections by the atten-
uation factor to get the area value for that sample. NOTE: Attenuation
factors which affect the plot traced, but not the area count returned by
an electronic integrator should not be multiplied by the average area
count. Observe the effect of attenuation changes made at the console of a
specific electronic integrator to determine the appropriate course of
action.
7. If the desorption solutions are to be used to generate the calibration
curve, then plot the expected standard solution concentrations on the ab-
scissa (x-axis) and corresponding area value on the ordinate (y-axis).
Perform a regression analysis and draw the least squares line on the plot.
NOTE: If the desorption efficiencies of the selected solvent vary with
concentration for any of the organics to be analyzed, the relationship
between the expected standard solution concentrations and the corresponding
area value will not be strictly linear. Evaluate the linearity of the
resulting plot using control samples, and obtain the prior approval of the
Administrator before utilizing a least squares line generated from such
data.
Calculate the desorption efficiency (DE), in percent, for each level of
spike using the calibration area for the corresponding standard prepared
directly in the desorption solvent using the following formula:
A. - A_
DE =
x 100%
Equation 5-13
where
As = Average area value for desorption carried out at given concentration
level, area counts,
Ad = Average area value for desorption carried out on blank sample, area
counts, and
Ac = Average calibration area value for the corresponding standard level
prepared directly in the desorption solvent, area counts.
The desorption efficiency achieved at each level must be greater than 50% for
the adsorption tube sampling and analytical method to be acceptable. If adsorption
tubes have become the only remaining sampling option, and the 50% criteria cannot
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 22
Preparation of Liquid Standards and Desorption Efficiency Samples
o
Date: Z/23/68 Preparer: &•
Organic Compound ;
Compound Source:
Compound Purity (P) ;
Liquid:
Compound Mole Weight (M) :
Adsorbent Material: Ar.tivb\td C&fat*^ Batch No: _/£]
Standards in Solvent ' Mixture 1
Desorption solvent volume (Va ) , ml 4-00
Compound spike amount (V0 ) , ul 4-°P
Organic compound density (p) , ug/ul /. £2-S
Standard concentration (C ) , ug/ml /. O2-
Standards on Adsorbent Mixture 1
Adsorbent amount, g £>.&W>
Compound spike amount (V0 ) , ul 4-. 00
Organic compound density (p) , ug/ul /, G>23
Desorption solvent volume {VB ) , ml 4. r>0
Desorption time, min. 3O
Standard concentration (C9 ) , ug/ml /•{?£-
o Desorption
Mixture 2
4.00
fi.OO
A 6>Z?
3. £5"
Solvent:
Mixture
4.00
I2.>0t>
1. 6>2J
/"/»,4f
Mixture 2 Mixture 3
0-8 CO
6.00
1. 62 i
4-.OD
5O
3.2.5"
0-800
f^CfO
J . (02$
4.0D
•30
6-.4T
W,
Blank
/.teZ3
4.00
GC Operating Conditions
Injection port temperature, °C
Carrier gas flow rate, ml/min
Column temperature:
Initial, °C
Program rate, °C/min
Final, °C
O
30
Chromatographic Results
Injection time, 24-hr clock
Distance to peak, cm
Chart speed, cm/min
Retention time, min
Attenuation factor
Standards in desorption solvent:
Peak area (Ac), area counts
Standards and blank from
adsorbent material:
Peak area (As and Ab),
area counts
Mixture 1 Mixture 2 Mixture 3 Blank
/5V 5?
47.3
/D
/O
4.73
.2-
857-
Desorption Efficiency Calculation
Desorption Efficiency (DE) , %
Mixture 1
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 23
be met, then, subject to the prior approval of the Administrator, explore more
vigorous desorption techniques such as longer desorption times, Bonification of the
vials during desorption, and/or other desorption solvents.
5.2 Audit Sample Analysis
After analysis of the calibration standards, and generation of a calibration
curve, conduct the analysis of the audit cylinder(s). Audit. samples should be
introduced into the GC by the same procedure used for the calibration standards. If
possible, the audit sample should be introduced into the probe for the direct and
dilution interface techniques. The audit sample analysis must agree within 10% of
the actual concentration of the audit sample before sample analysis can begin. If
the audit criteria is not met, first try recalibrating the GC with the existing
standards, and then reanalyze the audit sample(s). If the 10% criteria still
cannot be met, remake the standards, recalibrate the GC, and reanalyze the audit
sample until the criteria is met or a representative of the Administrator decides
differently.
5.3 Sample Analysis
After the GC has been calibrated and the analysis of the audit sample(s) has
been conducted successfully, the samples can be analyzed. Use the same procedures
for sample analysis that were used to analyze the calibration standards. Record
the GC conditions and the analytical data on the form provided in Figure 5«1. The
following subse'ctions describe the procedures for analyzing Tedlai* bag samples,
direct and dilution interface samples, adsorption tube samples, and heated syringe
samples.
5.3-1 Analysis of Bag Samples - The following procedures are to be used to analyze
emission samples collected in Tedlar bags using a GC calibrated with gaseous cali-
bration standards prepared following one or more of the procedures described in
Subsection 5-1-
1. Attach a quick connect, or similar connecting device that is compatible
with the connection on the Tedlar bag to the gas sampling valve on the GC.
Attach A manometer connected to a tee on the outlet of the sample loop.
2. With the gas sampling valve in the load position, attach the first Tedlar
bag sample to the valve. Use a pump on the outlet side of the sample loop
to flush the sample through the loop at 100 cc/min for 30 seconds.
3. Turn off the pump, allow the sample loop to return to the same pressure
used during calibration standard analysis, and immediately switch the valve
to the inject position.
4. Note the time of the injection on the strip chart recorder and/or actuate
the electronic integrator. Also, record the sample identity, detector
attenuation factor, chart speed, sample loop temperature, column tempera-
ture and identity, and the carrier gas type and flow rate on a data form
such as Figure 5-1- It is also recommended that the game information be
recorded directly on the chromatogram. Record the operating parameters for
the particular detector being used.
5. Examine the chromatogram to ensure that adequate resolution is being
achieved for the major components of the sample. If adequate resolution is
not being achieved, vary the GC conditions until resolution is achieved,
and reanalyze the standards to recalibrate the GC at the new conditions.
6. After conducting the analysis with acceptable peak resolution, determine
the retention time of the sample components and compare them to the reten-
-------
Section No. 3-16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 24
tion times for the standard compounds. To qualitatively identify an indi-
vidual sample component as a target compound, the retention time for the
component must match within 0.5 seconds or 1%, whichever is greater, of the
retention time of the target compound determined with the calibration
standards.
7. Repeat the injection of the first sample until the area count for each
identified target compound from two consecutive injections give area counts
within 5 percent of their average.
8. Multiply the average area count of the consecutive injections by the atten-
uation factor to get the area value for that sample, and record the area
value on the data form provided in Figure 5.1. NOTE: When dispensing
liquid from a syringe, take care to account for the volume of liquid
present in the syringe needle. In general, the potential error resulting
from the volume of the needle is most conveniently avoided by ensuring
that the needle volume is completely full of liquid upon -filling the
syringe and dispensing from it. If air pockets exist in the syringe after
filling, this will be almost impossible.
9. Repeat the procedure for the other two samples collected at the same sampl-
ing location.
10. Immediately following the analysis of the last sample, reanalyze the cali-
bration standards, and compare the area values for each standard to the
corresponding area values from the first calibration analysis. If the
individual area values are within 5% of their mean value, use the mean
values to generate a final calibration curve for determining the sample
concentrations. If the individual values are not within 5# of their mean
values, generate a calibration curve using the results of the second analy-
sis of the calibration standards, and report the sample results compared to
both standard curves.
Determine the bag sample water content by measuring the temperature and the
barometric pressure near the bag. Use water saturation vapor pressure chart, assum-
ing the relative humidity of the bag to be 100% unless a lower value is known, to
determine the water vapor content as a decimal figure (% divided by 100). If the
bag has been heated during sampling, the flue gas or duct moisture content should
be determined using Method 4.
5-3«2 Analysis of Direct Interface Samples - Prior to analysis of the direct
interface sample, the GC should be calibrated using a set of gaseous standards
prepared by one of the techniques described in Subsection 5-1 and a successful
analysis of an audit sample should be completed. If possible, the audit samples
should be introduced directly into the probe. Otherwise, the audit samples are
introduced into the sample line immediately following the probe. The calibration
is done by disconnecting the sample line coming from the probe, from the gas sampl-
ing valve sample loop inlet, and connecting the calibration standards to the loop
for analysis. During the analysis of the calibration standards and the audit
sample(s), make certain that the sample loop pressure immediately prior to the
injection of the standards is at the same pressure that will be used for sample
analysis. To analyze the direct interface samples after GC calibration, use the
following procedures:
1. Reconnect the sample line to the inlet of the gas sample loop, switch the
valve to the load position, and turn on the sampling pump. Adjust the
sampling rate to at least 100 cc/minute, and, for the first sample, purge
the sample line long enough to flush the sample loop and the preceding
volume of tubing a minimum of 7 times.
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 25
2. After purging the sampling system and the sample loop, decrease the sample
flow using the needle valve downstream of the loop until the loop pressure,
measured by a water manometer connected to a tee at the outlet of loop, is
equal to the pressure used during calibration.
3. Once the loop is at the correct pressure, immediately switch the sample
valve to the inject position. Note the time of the injection on the strip
chart recorder and/or actuate the electronic integrator. The flow through
the sample line can be returned to lOOcc/min after sample injection, and,
after the unretained compounds are detected, the gas sample valve can be
switched back to the load position. The system will then be ready to
inject the second sample as soon as the first analysis is completed.
4. Record the sample identity, detector attenuation factor, chart speed,
sample loop temperature, column temperature and identity, and the carrier
gas type and flow rate on a form such as Figure 5-1 •. It is also recom-
mended that the same information be recorded directly on the chromatogram.
Record the operating parameters for the particular detector being used.
5. Examine the chromatogram to ensure that adequate resolution is being
achieved for the major components of the sample. If adequate resolution is
not being achieved, vary the GC conditions until resolution is achieved,
and reanalyze the standards to recalibrate the GC at the new conditions.
6. Immediately after the first analysis is comple.te, repeat steps 2 and 3 to
begin the analysis of the second sample.
7. After conducting the analysis of the first sample with acceptable peak
resolution, determine the retention time of the sample components and
compare them to the retention times for the standard compounds. To quali-
tatively identify an individual sample component as a target compound, the
retention time for the component must match, within 0.5 seconds or 1%,
whichever is greater, the retention time of the target compound determined
with the calibration standards.
8. At the completion of the analysis of the second sample, determine if the
area counts for the two consecutive injections give area counts within 5
percent of their average. If this criterion cannot be met due to the
length of the analysis, and the emissions are known to vary because of a
cyclic or batch process, then the analysis results can still be used with
the prior approval of the Administrator.
9. Analyze a minimum of three samples collected by direct interface to consti-
tute an emissions test.
10. Immediately following the analysis of the last sample, reanalyze the cali-
bration standards, and compare the area values for each standard to the
corresponding .area values frpm the .first .calibration analysis. If the
individual area values are within 5% of their mean value.,, ,use the mean
values to generate a final calibration curve to determine the sample
concentrations. If the individual values are not within 5% of their mean
values, generate a calibration curve using the results of the second analy-
sis of the calibration standards, and report the sample results compared to
both standard curves.
5.3.3 Analysis of Dilution Interface Samples - For the analysis of dilution inter-
face samples, the procedures described for direct interface sampling in Subsection
5-3-2 should be followed, with the addition of a check of the dilution system.
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 26
Prior to any sample analysis, the GC must first be calibrated, followed by the
dilution system check and an analysis of the audit sample(s). The audit sample(s)
are introduced preferably into the inlet to the dilution system or directly into
the gas sampling valve. Use the following procedures to conduct the check of the
dilution system:
1. Heat the dilution system to the desired temperature (0° to 3°C above the
source temperature) or, if the dilution system components can not tolerate
that temperature, to a temperature high enough to prevent condensation.
2. Adjust the dilution system to achieve the desired dilution rate, and intro-
duce a high concentration target gas into the inlet of the dilution system.
After dilution through the stage(s) to be used for actual samples, the
target gas should be at a concentration that is within the calibration
range.
3. Purge the gas sample loop with diluted high concentration target gas at a
rate of 100 cc/min for 1 minute, adjust the loop pressure measured by a
water manometer connected to a tee at the outlet of the loop, to the loop
pressure that was used during calibration and will be used during sample
analysis. The procedure for pressure adjustment for the sample loop will
vary with the type of dilution system that is used. In general, the loop
pressure can be lowered by reducing the flow into the loop and raised by
restricting the flow from the loop.
4. After achieving the proper loop pressure, immediately switch the gas sample
valve to the inject position.
5. Note the time of the injection on the strip chart recorder and/or actuate
the electronic integrator. Also, record the sample identity, detector
attenuation factor, chart speed, sample loop temperature, column tempera-
ture and identity, and the carrier gas type and flow rate on a form such as
Figure 5.1 • It is also recommended that the same information be recorded
directly on the chromatogram. Record the operating parameters for the
particular detector being used.
6. Determine the peak area and retention time for the target compound used for
the dilution check, and calculate the area value using the detector attenu-
ation. Compare the retention time to the retention time of the target
compound calibration standard. The retention times should agree within 0.5
seconds or 1%, whichever is greater. If the retention times do not agree,
identify the problem and repeat the dilution check.
7. Calculate the concentration of the dilution check gas (Cd) using the fol-
lowing formula.
Equation 5-14
S
where
Y = Dilution check target compound peak area, area counts,
b = y-intercept of the calibration curve, area counts,
S = Slope of the calibration curve, area counts/ppmv , and /"""N
d = Dilution rate of the dilution system, dimensionless. f J
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 27
8. If the calculated value for the dilution check gas is not within 10# of the
actual dilution check gas, then determine if the GC or the dilution system
is in error. Check the calibration of the GC by analyzing one of the cali-
bration samples directly bypassing the dilution system. If the GC is
properly calibrated, then adjust the dilution system, and repeat the analy-
sis of the dilution check gas until the calculated results are within 1Q%
of the actual concentration.
Once the dilution system and the GC are operating properly, analyze the audit
sample(s). Upon completion of a successful audit, the system is ready to analyze
samples following the procedures described in Subsection 5-3-2. To load the sample
from the dilution system may not require a pump on the outlet of the sample loop,
but calibration of the GC using standards prepared in Tedlar bags will require a
pump. The system should be configured so that the pump can be taken off line when
it is not needed.
5-3«4 Analysis of Adsorption Tube Samples - Prior to the analysis of adsorption
tube samples, the target compounds adsorbed on the adsorption material must be
desorbed. The procedures found to give acceptable desorption efficiencies deter-
mined in Subsection 5.1.k should be used. The procedures for the analysis of the
sample desorption solutions are the same as those used for the standards. During
sample analysis, the sample collection efficiency must be determined. Use the
following procedures to determine the collection efficiency:
1. Desorb the primary and backup sections of the tubes separately using the
procedures found to give acceptable (50%) desorption efficiency for the
spiked adsorption material. Use the same final volume of desorption solu-
tion for the samples as was used for the standard solutions. If more than
one adsorption tube was used in series per test run, delay desorbing the
additional tubes until the analysis of the primary and backup section of
the first tube is complete, and the collection efficiency for the first
tube determined. Select the samples from the sampling run when the flue
gas or duct moisture was the highest and, if known, when the target com-
pound concentrations were the highest and analyze them first.
2. Calibrate the GC using standards prepared directly in desorption solvent or
prepared on adsorbent and desorbed.
3. Select a suitably sized injection syringe (5~ or 10-wl), and flush the
syringe with acetone (or some other suitable solvent if acetone is a target
compound) to clean the syringe.
4. Flush the syringe with the desorption solution from the tube's backup
section by withdrawing a syringe full of the solution from the septum vial,
and dispensing the solution into a beaker containing charcoal adsorbent.
5- Refill the syringe with the backup section desorption solution, withdraw
the syringe from the vial, and wipe the syringe needle with a laboratory
tissue.
6. Adjust the syringe volume down to the amount used for injecting standards
and inject the sample into the GC. Note the time of the injection on the
strip chart recorder and/or actuate the electronic integrator. Also,
record the sample identity, detector attenuation factor, chart speed,
injection port temperature, column temperature and identity, and the carri-
er gas type and flow rate on the data form shown in Figure 5•1• It is also
recommended that the same information be recorded directly on the chromato-
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 28
gram. Record the operating parameters for the particular detector being
used.
7. After the analysis, determine the retention time of the major sample
components, and compare these retention times to the retention times deter-
mined for the target compounds during analysis of the standards. To quali-
tatively identify an individual sample component as a target compound, the
retention time for the component must match, within 0.5 seconds or 1%,
whichever is greater, the retention time of the target compound determined
with the calibration standards. Determine the peak area for each target
compound identified in the sample.
8. Repeat the injection of the first sample until the area counts for each
identified target compound from two consecutive injections are within 5
percent of their average.
9. Multiply the average area count of the consecutive injections by the atten-
uation factor to get the area value for that sample.
10. Next analyze the desorption solution from the primary section of the same
adsorption tube following steps 4 through 9 above.
11. For each target compound, calculate the total weight (W), in ug, present in
each section, taking into account the desorption efficiency using the
formula below.
(Y - b) 1
W or Wb = x — Equation 5-15
S DE
where
Y = Average value for the target compound in the section (primary or
backup), area counts,
b = y-intercept from the three-point calibration curve for the target
compound, area counts,
S = Slope from the three-point calibration curve for the target
compound, area/ug, and
DE = Desorption efficiency (if standards prepared directly in
desorption solvent are used for calibration).
12. Determine the percent of the total catch found in the primary section for
each target compound identified using the following formula.
mpx
Ecx = x 100# Equation 5-16
Kx + m*x)
where
ECJ£ = Collection efficiency of the primary section for target compound
x, percent,
mpx = Catch of compound x in the primary section, ug, and
mhx = Catch of compound x in the backup section, ug.
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
, Page 29
If the collection efficiency for the primary section for each target com-
pound identified is >^ 90%, then the collection efficiency for that compound
is acceptable. If the collection efficiency for all the target compounds
identified in the sample is acceptable, then the analysis of any additional
tubes used in series behind the first tube will not be necessary. Proceed
with the analysis of the other adsorption tube samples.
12. If the collection efficiency for any identified target compound is not
acceptable, then analyze the second tube (if used) connected in series and
determine the collection efficiency for that tube using the steps described
above. If the second tube does not exhibit acceptable collection and a
third tube was used, analyze the third tube. If acceptable collection
efficiency cannot be demonstrated for the sampling system, then the emis-
sion test using adsorption tubes will not be acceptable.
13. Immediately following the analysis of the last sample, reanalyze the cali-
bration standards, and compare the area values for each standard to the
corresponding area values from the first calibration analysis. If the
individual area values are within 5% of their mean value, use the mean
values to generate a final calibration curve for determining the sample
concentrations. If the individual values are not within 5% of their mean
values, generate a calibration curve using the results of the second analy-
sis of the calibration standards, and report the sample results compared to
both standard curves.
5.3-5 Analysts of Heated Syringe Gas Samples by Direct Injection - For the analy-
sis of samples collected in heated syringes, the GC will have to be equipped with
an injection septum fitted to the gas sampling valve sample loop inlet. Calibrate
the GC following one of the procedures described in Subsection 5.1 for gaseous
calibration standards. Analyze the heated syringe samples by the following proce-
dures :
1. Attach a GC septum to a quick connect, or equivalent, compatible with the
connector on the gas sampling valve, and attach this connector to the gas
sampling valve.
2. Insert the needle of the heated syringe through the septum, and purge the
sample loop by injecting a volume of the gas sample at least ten times
greater than the sample loop volume.
3. Allow the sample loop pressure, measured by a water manometer connected to
a tee on the outlet of the sample loop, to reach the same loop pressure
seen during analysis of the calibration standards, and immediately switch
the gas sample valve to the inject position.
4. Note the time of the injection on the strip chart recorder and/or actuate
the electronic integrator. Also, record the sample identity, detector
attenuation factor, chart speed, sample loop temperature and volume, column
temperature and identity, and the carrier gas type and flow rate on a form
such as Figure 5-1- It is also recommended that the same information be
recorded directly on the chromatogram. Record the operating parameters for
the particular detector being used.
5. Examine the chromatogram to ensure that adequate resolution is being
achieved for the major components of the sample. If adequate resolution is
not being achieved, vary the GC conditions until resolution is achieved,
and reanalyze the standards to recalibrate the GC at the new conditions.
-------
Section No. 3.16.5 x—v
Date June 30, 1988 ( )
Page 30 ^*~*/
6. After conducting the analysis with acceptable peak resolution, determine
the retention time of the sample components and compare them to the reten-
tion times for the standard compounds. To qualitatively identify an indi-
vidual sample component as a target compound, the retention tine for the
component must match, within 0.5 seconds or 1%, whichever is greater, the
retention time of the target compound determined with the calibration
standards.
7. Repeat the injection of the first sample until the area counts for each
identified target compound from two consecutive injections are within 5
percent of their average.
8. Multiply the average area count of the consecutive injections by the atten-
uation factor to get the area value for that sample.
9. Repeat the procedure for the other two samples collected at the same sampl-
ing location.
10. Immediately following the analysis of the last sample, reanalyze the cali-
bration standards, and compare the area values for each standard to the
corresponding area values from the first calibration analysis. If the
individual area values are within 5% of their mean value, use the mean
values to generate a final calibration curve for determining the sample
concentrations. If the individual values are not within 5% of their mean
values, generate a calibration curve using the results of the second analy-
sis of the calibration standards, and report the sample results compared to
both standard curves.
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 31
Date Plant Name Sampling Location
Checks for Analysis of All Calibration Standards
A minimum of three concentration levels used for each target compound?
yes no. (The concentration used should bracket the expected
concentrations of the actual field samples.)
Proper GC conditions established prior to standard analysis? yes no.
(For initial conditions use analytical conditions found to be acceptable
during preliminary survey sample analysis.)
Individual peak areas for consecutive injections within 5% of their mean for
each target compound? yes no. (Repeat analysis of standards
until 5% criteria is met.)
Second analysis of standards after sample analysis completed? yes no.
Peak areas for repeat analysis of each standard within 5% of their mean peak
area? yes no. (If no, then report sample results compared to both
standard curves.)
Checks for Calibrations using Commercial Cylinder Gases
Vendor concentration verified by direct analysis? yes no.
Sample loop purged for 30 seconds at 100 ml/min prior to injection of calibra-
tion standards? yes no.
Checks for Preparation and Use of Calibration Standards Prepared by Dilution
Dilution system flowmeters calibrated? yes no. (Calibrate following
procedure described in Subsection 2.1.3.)
Sample loop purged for 30 seconds at 100 ml/min prior to injection of calibra-
tion standards? yes no.
Dilution ratio for dilution system verified? yes no. (Analysis of
low concentration cylinder gas after establishing calibration curve
recommended to verify dilution procedure, but not required since audit
sample will also verify dilution ratio.)
Figure 5-10. Postsampling operations checklist.
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988 x—v
Page 32 (J
Figure 5.10 (Continued)
Checks for Preparation and Use of Calibration Standards by Direct Injection of
Gaseous Compounds or Liquid Injection
Tedlar bag used to contain prepared standard leak and contamination free?
yes no .
Dry gas meter used to fill bag calibrated? yes no. (Calibrate meter
following procedure described in Subsection 2.1.2.)
Organic standard material used for injection 99-9# pure? yes no. (If
no, then determine purity and use to correct calculated calibration
standard concentration.)
Prepared standard allowed to equilibrate prior to injection? yes no.
(Massage bag by alternately depressing opposite ends 50 times.)
Sample loop purged for 30 seconds at 100 ml/min prior to injection of calibra-
tion standards? yes no.
Development of Relative Response Factors and Retention Times
Suitable target organic or surrogate compound selected? yes no. I J
(Select compound that is stable, easy to prepare in the field, and has a
retention time similar to the target organic compounds.)
Relative response factors and retention times verified in the laboratory prior
to actual field use? yes no. (If no, verify following the
procedure described in Subsection 5.1.4.)
Checks for Preparation. Use, and Determination of Desorption Efficiency for Adsorp-
tion Tube Standards
Organic standard material used for injection 99.9# pure? yes no. (If
no, then determine purity and use to correct calculated calibration
standard concentration.)
Correct adsorbent material and desorption solvent selected? yes no.
(Refer to Table B in Method Highlights Section for proper adsorbent
material and desorption solvent.)
Desorption efficiency determined for adsorbent to be used for field sampling?
yes no. (If no, follow the procedure described in Subsection
5.1.5.)
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 33
Figure 5.10 (Continued)
Checks for All GC Analysis of Field Samples
Check type of carrier gas used: helium , nitrogen , other
Carrier gas flow rate and pressure set correctly? yes no. (Carrier
gas flow rate and pressure set according to conditions developed during
presurvey sample analysis and within limitations of the GC as specified
by GC manufacturer.)
Oxygen and hydrogen flow rate and pressure for FID correct? yes no
(Oxygen and hydrogen gas flow rate and pressure for FID set according to
conditions developed during presurvey sample analysis and within
limitations of the GC as specified by GC manufacturer.)
Individual peak areas for consecutive injections within 5% of their mean for
each target compound? yes no. (Repeat analysis of standards
until 5# criteria is met.)
Audit sample analyzed and results within 10% of actual value? yes no.
(If no, recalibrate GC and/or reanalyze audit sample.)
Checks Type of Standard Used for Tedlar Bag Sample Analysis
Gas cylinders , dilution of gas cylinders , direct gas injection ,
direct liquid injection , and/or relative response factors and
retention times .
Checks For GC Analysis Of Tedlar Bag Samples
Sample loop purged for 30 sec. at 100 ml/min prior to injection of calibration
standards? yes no.
Stability of gas sample in Tedlar bag determined? yes no. (Deter-
mine stability by conducting a second analysis after the first at a time
period equal to the time between collection and the first analysis. The
change in concentration between the first and second analysis should be
less than 10%.)
Retention of target compounds in Tedlar bag determined? yes no. (If
no, then follow the procedure described in Subsection 5-3-1-)
Check GC Interface Technique Used
Direct Interface , 10:1 Dilution Interface , 100:1 Dilution Interface
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 34
Figure 5.10 (Continued)
Checks For Suitability of GC Interface Technique
Analytical interference due to moisture content of source gas? _ yes _ no.
(Moisture in the source gas must not interfere with analysis in regard
to peak resolution according to EPA Method 625 criterion where the
baseline-to-valley height between adjacent peaks ic less than 2$% of the
sum of the two adjacent peaks.)
Physical requirements for equipment met on-site? _ yes _ no. (The
physical requirements for the equipment include sheltered environment,
"clean", uninterrupted power source suited for equipment, and adherence to
safety aspects related to explosion risk areas.)
Source gas concentration below level of GC detector saturation? _ yes _ no.
(Concentrations delivered to the detector can be reduced by using smaller
gas sample loops and/or dilution interface . )
Sampling systems purged with 7 changes of system volume prior to sample
analysis? _ yes _ no.
Check Type(s) of Standards Used for Interface Techniques
Gas cylinders _ , dilution of gas cylinders _ , direct gas injection _ ,
direct liquid injection _ , and/or relative response factors and
retention times _ .
Checks For Dilution Interface Analytical Apparatus
Dilution rate verified (within 10%) by introducing high concentration gas
through dilution system and analyzing diluted gas? _ yes _ no.
(If dilution rate not verified, then first check calibration of GC by
reanalyzing a calibration standard and then adjust dilution system to give
desired ratio) .
Sampling systems purged with 7 changes of system volume prior to sample
analysis? _ yes _ no.
Check Type of Standard Used for Adsorption Tube Analysis
Prepared directly in desorption solvent _ , and/or prepared on adsorbent and
desorbed _ .
Checks for GC Analysis of Adsorption Tube Samples
Desorption procedure used identical to procedure used to determine the
desorption efficiency? _ yes _ no.
S~\
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 35
Figure 5-10 (Continued)
Collection efficiency determined for adsorption tubes used for actual field
sampling? yes no. (If no, then determine collection efficiency
following the procedures described in Subsection 5-3-4.)
Check Type of Standard Used for Analysis of Heated Syringe Samples
Gas cylinders , dilution of gas cylinders , direct gas injection ,
direct liquid injection , and/or relative response factors and
retention times
XT/ -•
-------
Section No. 3-16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 36
Table 5.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Characteristic
Calibration
Standards
All calibrations
Commercial gas
cylinder mixtures
Gas standards from
high concentration
gas cylinders
Standards prepared
by direct gas
injection
Standards prepared
by liquid
injection
(Continued)
Acceptance limits
1) Standard analysis
performed under same
GC conditions to be
used for samples
2) Three-point
(minimum) calibra-
tion curve generated
for each target
compound
3) Sufficient amount
of each standard to
recalibrate after
samples are analyzed
Certified by direct
analysis (within 5#
of manufacturer's
value); three levels
bracketing samples
Dilution ratio of
dilution system
verified (optional)
with calculated val-
ue using calibration
curve within 10%
of actual cone.
Gas injected 99.9#
pure, or calculated
standard concentra-
tion corrected for
gas impurity
Liquid injected
99-92 Pure, or
calculated standard
corrected for
liquid impurity
Frequency and method
of measurement
Before analysis of
calibration standards
determine sample ana-
lysis conditions
Before analysis ac-
quire or prepare stan-
dards for each target
compound at three
levels
Prior to initial
calibration and sample
analysis, determine
amount needed
Prior to use, check if
independent analysis
conducted and accept-
able and standards
will bracket samples
Prior to sample analy-
sis; calibration curve
from standards verif-
ied by analysis of an
undiluted sample
When calculating stan-
dard concentration,
determine purity of
gas standard
When calculating stan-
dard concentration,
determine purity of
liquid standard
Action if
requirements
are not met
Reanalyze stan-
dards under con-
ditions to be
used for samples
Acquire or pre-
pare standards at
at three levels
to bracket
samples
Acquire or
prepare
enough
standards
Procure certified
gas cylinders in
proper range
Identify and
correct problems
with dilution
system, and
remake, reana-
lyze, and re-
verify standards
Use pure gas or
determine purity
Use pure liquid
or determine
purity
o
o
o
-------
Table 5.1 (Continued)
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 37
Characteristic
Calibration
Standards
Relative response
factors and rela-
tive retention
times
Standards prepared
for adsorption
tube samples
Audit sample
analysis
Sample Analysis
All samples
Acceptance limits
Proper target or
surrogate standard
selected for on-site
calibration; method
verified (calculated
results within 10%
of actual concentra-
tion)
1) Liquid injected
99.9% pure, or
calculated standard
corrected for
2) Acceptable
desorption effici-
ency for target com-
pounds on adsorbent
material (>50#)
Analytical result
for audit sample
within 10% of actual
concentration
1) Audit sample
analysis within 10%
of actual cone.
2) Sample analysis
conditions the same
as conditions used
for analysis of
standards
Frequency and method
of measurement
When selecting stan-
dard choose stable,
easy to prepare stan-
dard with retention
time near or between
target compounds; ver-
fied following proced-
ures described in
Subsection 5.1.5
When calculating stan-
dard concentration,
determine purity of
liquid standard
During calibration
standard analysis
determine desorption
efficiency for each
target compound (see
Subsection 5.1.5)
After initial cali-
bration and prior to
sample analysis, ana-
lyze audit sample
Prior to sample ana-
lysis, analyze audit
sample
Prior to sample ana-
lysis check that ana-
lytical conditions are
the same as those used
for standard analysis
Action if
requirements
are not met
Select different
target or
surrogate
compound; if
procedure cannot
be verified
use calibration
standard for each
target compound
Use pure liquid
or determine
purity
Try longer de-
sorption times,
more vigorous
desorption condi-
tions , and/or
other desorbents
Reanalyze audit
sample, if not
acceptable, re-
make and reana-
lyze standards
Analyze audit
sample
Establish the
same analytical
conditions used
during analysis
of standards
(Continued)
-------
Table 5.1 (Continued)
Section No. 3-16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 38
o
Characteris tic
Sample Analysis
All samples
Bag samples
Acceptance limits
3) Retention times
for target compounds
identified in sample
within 0.5 seconds
or 1% of standards
4) Area counts for
consecutive injec-
tions of samples
within 5# of their
average for each
target compound
identified in sample
5) All three samples
constituting a test
analyzed together
6) After sample ana-
lysis, repeat analy-
sis of standards;
area counts for each
standard analysis
within 5% of their
mean
1) Bag sample moist-
ure content deter-
mined
2) Stability check
conducted on bag
content (<1Q% change
between first and
second analysis)
Frequency and method
of measurement
After analysis, deter-
mine retention times
for major components
in sample and compare
to standard retention
times
After second analysis
of a sample, calculate
average area for first
and second analysis
and percent difference
of single analysis
from the average
During sample analysis
After analysis of last
sample repeat standard
analysis; calculate
mean area counts and
percent difference for
each standard
During analysis using
vapor pressure chart
assuming 100% or known
value for relative
humidity
Second analysis con-
ducted n days after
first analysis where
n equals the number of
days between sample
collection and first
analysis
Action if
requirements
are not met
Qualitative
identification
requires reten-
times within 0.5
seconds or 1%;
repeat analysis
Repeat sample
injections until
consecutive in-
jections are
achieved meeting
the 5X criteria
for each target
compound
Analyze remaining
samples
Report sample
results using
both curves, if
5# criteria not
met
O
Measure ambient
pressure and
temperature near
bag
Conduct stabil-
ity check and if
criteria not met
then correct sam-
ple results with
approval of
Administrator
o
(Continued)
'
-------
Section No. 3.16.5
Date June 30, 1988
Page 39
Table 5.1 (Continued)
Characteristic
Sample Analysis
Direct interface
samples
Dilution interface
samples
Adsorption tube
samples
Acceptance limits
Two consecutive
injections give
area counts within
5# of their mean
1) Dilution ratio
verified (results
from analysis of
high concentration
standard through
dilution system
within 10% of actual
concentration
2) Two consecutive
injections give
area counts within
5% of their mean
Collection effici-
ency determined for
adsorption tubes
(902 of each target
compound identified
caught on primary
section)
Frequency and method
of measurement
After second analysis,
calculate average area
counts and percent
difference
Prior to sample ana-
lysis analyze high
concentration gas
introduced through
dilution system
After second analysis,
calculate average area
counts and percent
difference
Desorb and analyze
primary and backup
sections separately
Action if
requirements
are not met
Due to cyclic or
batch processes
and analysis
time, emission
levels may vary;
use results with
the prior appro-
val of the Ad-
ministrator
Identify problem;
recalibrate GC or
adjust dilution
system and repeat
analysis of high
concentration
gas
Due to cyclic or
batch processes
and analysis
time, emission
levels may vary;
use results with
the prior ap-
proval of the
Administrator
Analyze addi-
tional tube(s) if
used as backups
to first tube; if
criteria cannot
be met, test is
not valid
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.6
Date June 30, 1988
Page 1
6.0 CALCULATIONS
Calculation errors due to procedural or mathematical mistakes can be a part of
total system error. Therefore, it is recommended that each set of calculations be
repeated or spotchecked, preferably by a team member other than the one who per-
formed the original calculations. If a difference greater than typical round-off
error is detected, the calculations should be checked step-by-step until the source
of error is found and corrected. A computer program is advantageous in reducing
calculation errors. If a standardized computer program is used, the original data
entered should be included in the printout so it can be reviewed; if differences
are observed, a new computer run should be made. Table 6.1 at the end of this
section summarizes the quality assurance activities for calculations.
Calculations should be carried out to at least one extra decimal figure beyond
that of the acquired data and should be rounded off after final calculation to two
significant digits for each run or sample. All rounding of numbers should be
performed in accordance with the ASTM 380-?6 procedures. All calculations should
then be recorded on a calculation form such as the ones in Figures 6.1 and 6.2 for
analysis by gas or liquid injection, respectively.
6.1 Calculations for GC Analysis Using Gas Injection
The same equation can be used to calculate the concentration of each organic
in Method 18 samples whenever the sampling technique used yields a gaseous sample
which can be injected into the GC. These techniques are: (1) the integrated bag
sampling technique, (2) the heated bag sampling technique, (3) the prefilled bag
sampling technique, (4) the direct interface sampling technique, and (5) the dilu-
tion interface sampling technique. This equation is used to calculate the sample
concentration (Cc) in ppm on a dry basis as follows:
Fr K
Equation 6-1
Pi Tr
where
B..
K
Concentration of organic from calibration curve, ppm,
Reference pressure, the barometric pressure or absolute sample loop
pressure recorded during calibration, mm Hg,
Sample loop temperature at time of sample analysis, °K,
Barometric or absolute sample loop pressure at time of sample analysis,
mm Hg,
Reference temperature, the temperature of the sample loop recorded
during calibration, °K,
Water vapor content of the stack gas, proportion by volume,
Relative response factor, if applicable (see Subsection 5-I-5). and
Dilution factor (applicable only for dilution interface and prefilled
bag sampling; for a 10 to 1 dilution, K = 10).
-------
Section No. 3.16.6
Date June 30, 1988
Page 2
6.2 Calculations for GC Analysis by Liquid Injection
For Method 18, liquid injection GC analyses are used in conjunction with the
adsorption tube sampling procedure. The same general equations are typically used
to calculate the concentration of each organic in a sample collected on an adsorp-
tion tube. However, the tester is referred to the National Institute of Occupa-
tional Health and Safety (NIOSH) method (see Table B in the Method Highlights
Section) for specifics on calculations for particular organics. The general equa-
tions are shown below.
6.2.1 Sample Volume Corrected to Standard Conditions on a Dry Basis - The correct-
ed sample volume (VBtd(dry) is calculated as shown.
T P v P V
Astd *bar vm „ „ *b a r vm
„ „
Vltd(d = - : - = 0.3858
P.«« T. (i -B../K)' T.
Equation 6-2
where
T,td/p,td = °-3858 °K/mm Hg,
Vn = Sample volume measured, L,
Pbar = Barometric pressure during sampling, mm Hg,
T8 = Temperature of sample gas, °K,
Bw$ = Water vapor of stack gas, proportion by volume, and
K = Dilution factor, if applicable.
"Note: Only apply thio correction if a denoicont is not used.
6.2.2 Desorptton Efficiency - Desorption efficiency (DE) for recovery of a speci-
fic compound using a certain solvent from an adsorption tube is calculated using
the following equation.
Qr -B
DE = - Equation 6-3
where
Qr = Average peak area for spiked tubes,
Qa = Average peak area for spiked solutions, and
B = Average peak area for media blanks.
6.3-3 Concentration of Organic in Sample - The concentration (C) of the organic in
the sample in milligrams per dry standard cubic meter or micrograms per dry stand-
ard liter (mg/dscm or ug/dsL) is calculated using the following equation.
o
-------
c =
(Wf + Wb - Bf - Bb)K
Section No. 3.16.6
Date June 30, 1988
Page 3
Equation 6-4
where
B.
K
V.td,
DE
dry
= Mass of organic found in primary sorbent section, ug,
= Mass of organic found in backup sorbent section, ug,
= Mass of organic found in primary section of average media
blank, ug,
= Mass of organic found in backup section of average media
blank, ug,
= Dilution factor, if applicable (for a 10 to 1 dilution, K = 10),
= Sample volume corrected to standard conditions and a dry
basis, L, and
= Desorption efficiency, decimal value.
6.2.4 Conversion to ppm - To convert the concentration in milligrams per dry
standard cubic meter (micrograms per dry standard liter) to ppm, the following
equation can be used.
ppn
where
C
MW
24.055 (dsL/g-mole gas) x C
MW
Concentration of organic, ug/dsL or mg/dscm, and
Molecular weight of organic, ug/ug-mole.
Equation 6-5
-------
SAMPLE CONCENTRATION
mm
K* = A/ A; . _, F/
Cs Pr Tt Fr K
*If applicable.
Section No. 3.16.6
Date June 30, 1988
Page *»
Equation 6-1
o
Figure 6.1. Calculation form for GC analysis by gas injection.
O
-------
jj Section No. 3.16.6
* Date June 30, 1988
Page 5
SAMPLE VOLUME, DRY BASIS AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
V,, = ^-^_ . ^ L, Pbar = _? JT^l • _2 mo Hg,
T = 3_ 0_ 0_ . D_ °K, Bws" =0._^_^, K*= _ _ •
P V
bar m i r~" ».
V.,, dpv = 0.3858 = £• & . 0 L Equation 6-2
" T. (1 -Bwg/K)" -
*If applicable.
DESORPTION EFFICIENCY
DE = (Qr - B)/Qa = 0 . __ _^ Equation 6-3
SAMPLE CONCENTRATION
wp - .82 A-V.VB. wb = j_ z_ o_ . 6_ ug, Bp = ___ g_ us,
Bb - ___ 0_ug, V8td = __^£".f.L, DE = O.f.£.
V8td
= 3 fj_ . J?_ og/dscm or ug/dsL Equation 6-4
CONVERSION TO PPM
C = ___ . _ mg/dscm or ug/dsL, MW = __ ^ _^ . _/ ug/ug-mole,
C „ = ' gas) x C = _ J_ £ . £ ppm Equation 6-5
MW
Figure 6.2. Calculation form for GC analysis by liquid injection.
-------
Section No. 3.16.6
Date June 30, 1988
Page 6
o
Table 6.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR CALCULATION CHECKS
Characteristic
Analysis data
form
Calculations
Acceptance limits
All data and calcu-
tions are shown
Difference between
check and original
calculations should
not exceed round-off
error
Frequency and method
of measurement
Visually check
Repeat all calcula-
tions starting with
raw data for hand
calculations; check
all raw data input
for computer calcu-
lations; hand calcu-
late one sample per
test
Action if
requirements
are not met
Complete the
missing data
Indicate errors
on calculation
form. Figure 6.1
or 6.2
O
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.7
Date June 30, 1988
Page 1
7.0 MAINTENANCE
The normal use of emission- testing equipment subjects it to corrosive gases,
extremes in temperature, vibration, and shock. Keeping the equipment in good
operating order over an extended period of time requires knowledge of the equipment
and a program of routine maintenance which is performed quarterly or after 2830 L
(100 ft3) of operation, whichever is greater. In addition to the quarterly main-
tenance, a yearly cleaning of pumps and metering systems is recommended. Main-
tenance procedures for the various components are summarized in Table 7-1 at the
end of the section. The following procedures are not required, but are recommended
to increase the reliability of the equipment.
7.1 Pump
Several types of pumps may be used to perform Method 18; the two most common
are the fiber vane pump with in-line oiler and the diaphragm pump. The fiber vane
pump requires a periodic check of the oiler jar. Its contents should be translu-
cent; the oil should be changed if not translucent. Use the oil specified by the
manufacturer. If none is specified, use SAE-10 nondetergent oil. Whenever a fiber
vane pump starts to run erratically or during the yearly disassembly, the head
should be removed and the fiber vanes changed. Erratic operation of a diaphragm
pump is normally due to either a bad diaphragm (causing leakage) or to malfunctions
of the valves, which should be cleaned annually by complete disassembly.
7.2 Dry Gas Meter
Dry gas meters should be checked for excess oil or corrosion of the components
by removing the top plate every 3 months. Meters should be disassembled and all
components cleaned and checked whenever the rotation of the dials is erratic,
whenever the meter will not calibrate properly over the required flow rate range,
and during the yearly maintenance.
7.3 Rotameter
Rotameters should be disassembled and cleaned according to the manufacturer's
instructions using only recommended cleaning fluids every 3 months or upon erratic
operation .
7.4 Manometer
The fluid in the manometers should be changed whenever there is discoloration
or visible matter in the fluid, and during the yearly disassembly.
7-5 Sampling Train
All remaining sampling train components should be visually checked every 3
months and completely disassembled and cleaned or replaced yearly. Many items,
such as quick disconnects , should be replaced whenever damaged rather than checked
periodically. Normally, the best procedure for maintenance in the field is to have
on hand another entire unit such as a pump, Tedlar bags and containers, or heated
sample line rather than replacing individual components.
-------
Section No. 3.16.7
Date June 30, 1988
Page 2
7.6 Oas Chromatograph
o
Maintenance activities and schedules for gas chromatographs are make and nodol
specific. It is therefore recommended that the analyst consult the operator's
manual for instructions relative to maintenance practices and procedures.
O
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.7
Date June 30, 1988
Page 3
Table 7.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CHECKS
Apparatus
Fiber vane
pump
Diaphragm
pump
Dry gas meter
Rotameter
Manometer
Sampling
train
components
Gas chroina-
tograph
Acceptance limits
In-line oiler
free of leaks
Leak- free valves
functioning properly
No excess oil,
corrosion, or er-
ratic rotation of
the dial
Clean and no erra-
tic behavior
No discoloration or
visible matter in
the fluid
No damage
See owner's manual
Frequency and method
of measurement
Periodically check
oiler jar; remove
head and change fiber
vanes
Clean valves during
yearly disassembly
Check every 3 mo. for
excess oil or corro-
sion by removing the
top plate; check
valves and diaphragm
yearly and whenever
meter dial runs erra-
tically or whenever
meter will not cal-
ibrate
Clean every 3 no. or
whenever ball does
not move freely
Check periodically
and during disassemb-
ly
Visually check every
3 mo.; completely
disassemble and
clean or replace
yearly
See owner's manual
Action if require-
ments are not met
Replace as
needed
Replace when
leaking or mal-
functioning
Replace parts as
needed, or replace
meter
Replace
Replace parts
as needed
If failure noted,
replace appro-
priate components
See owner's manual
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.8
Date June 30, 1988
Page 1
8.0 AUDITING PROCEDURES
An audit is an independent assessment of data quality. Independence is
achieved if the . individual(s) performing the audit and their standards and
equipment are different from the regular field team and their standards and
equipment. Routine quality assurance checks by a field team are necessary to
generate good quality data, but they are not part of the auditing procedure. Table
8.1 at the end of this section summarizes the quality assurance functions for
auditing.
Based on the requirements of Method 18 and the results of collaborative test-
ing of other Reference Methods, two specific performance audits are recommended:
1. An audit of the sampling and analysis of Method 18 is required for NSPS
and recommended for other purposes.
2. And audit of the data processing is recommended.
It is suggested that a systems audit be conducted as specified by the quality
assurance coordinator in addition to these performance audits. The two performance
audits and the systems audit are described in detail in Subsections 8.1 and 8.2,
respectively.
8.1 Performance Audits
Performance audits are conducted to evaluate quantitatively the quality of
data produced by the total measurement system (sample collection, sample analysis,
and data processing). It is required that cylinder gas performance audits be
performed once during every NSPS test utilizing Method 18 and it is recommended
that a cylinder gas audit be performed once during any enforcement source test
utilizing Method 18 conducted under regulations other than NSPS.
8.1.1 Performance Audit of the Field Test - As stated in Section 6.5 of 40 CFR 60,
Appendix A, Method 18, immediately after the preparation of the calibration curves
and prior to the sample analysis, the analysis audit described in 40 CFR 61, Appen-
dix C, Procedure 2: "Procedure for Field Auditing GC Analysis," should be per-
formed. The information required to document the analysis of the audit sample(s)
has been included on the example data sheets shown in Figures 8.1 and 8.2; the
complete text of the procedure is reproduced in Section 3.16.10. The audit anal-
yses shall agree within 10 percent (or other specified value, as explained below)
of the true value. When available, the tester may obtain audit cylinders by
contacting: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Atmospheric Research and Exposure
Assessment Laboratory, Quality Assurance Division (MD-77B), Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina 27711• Audit cylinders obtained from a commercial gas manufacturer
may be used provided that (i) the gas manufacturer certifies the audit cylinder in
a manner similar to the procedure described in 40 CFR 61, Appendix B, Method 106,
Section 5.2.3-It and (2) the gas manufacturer obtains an independent analysis.
Independent analysis is defined as an analysis performed by an individual other
than the individual who performs the gas manufacturer's analysis, while using
calibration standards and analysis equipment different from those used for the gas
manufacturer's analysis. Verification is completed and acceptable when the
independent analysis concentration is within 5 percent of the gas manufacturer's
concentration.
Responsibilities of the Audit Supervisor - The primary responsibilities of
the audit supervisor are to ensure that the proper audit gas cylinder (s) are or-
-------
Section No. 3.16.8
Date June 30, 1988
Page 2
dered and safe-guarded, and to interpret the results obtained by the analyst.
When auditing sampling systems that do not dilute the stack gases during samp-
ling, the audit gases ordered must consist of the same organic compound(s) that are
being tested; for emission standards on a concentration basis, the audit gas
concentration!s) must be in>tJierange of 25% to 2$Q% of the applicable standard. If
two cylinders are not available, then one cylinder can be used. If the audit
cylinder value is between 5 an^ 20 ppm, the agreement should be within 15 percent
of the stated audit cylinder value. It is strongly recommended that audit cylinder
values below 5 ppm not be used. For emission standards which specify a control
efficiency, the concentration of the audit gases should be in the range of 25% to
250/£ of the expected stack gas concentration. If two cylinders are not available,
the audit can be conducted using one cylinder.
The audit supervisor must ensure that the audit gas cylinder(s) are shipped to
the correct address, and to prevent vandalism, verify that they are stored in a
safe location both before and after the audit. Also, the audit cylinders should
not be analyzed when the pressure drops below 200 psi. The audit supervisor then
ensures that the audits are conducted as described below.
The audit supervisor must also interpret the audit results. When the measured
concentration agrees within 10 percent (or 15 percent for cylinders between 5 and
20 ppm) of the true value, he directs the analyst to begin analyzing the source
samples. When the measured concentration does not agree within the specified
criterion, the analyst should first recheck the analytical system and calculations,
and then repeat the audit. If the analyst fails the second audit, the audit
supervisor should have knowledge of the agency's policy for failure. If the
result(s) are close to the allowed percentage or a consistent bias is present, the
supervisor may wish to allow.the analyst use of a correction factor to be applied
at a later date; however, the analyst must make a significant effort to find the
discrepancy and correct it. If the error cannot be found, the audit supervisor
should allow analysis of the samples, and then conduct the audit again.
During the audit, the audit supervisor should record the appropriate cylinder
number(s), cylinder pressure(s) (at the end of the audit), and the calculated con-
centrations on the "Field audit report form", Figure 8.1. The individual being
audited must not, under any circumstances, be told the actual audit concentrations
until the calculated concentration^) have been submitted to the audit supervisor
and are considered acceptable.
When auditing sampling systems that dilute the emissions during collection,
the audit gas concentration value used in the calculations can either be based on
(1) the undiluted concentration using the criteria discussed above or (2) the
expected concentration of the gases following dilution during collection using the
same dilution factor as used for the emission samples.
The audit procedures that follow are presented according to the type of samp-
ling system used to collect the organic emissions and whether the samples are
analyzed on-site or at the base laboratory at a later date.
Container (Bag, Syringe, and Canister) Sampling with On-site Analysis - The
cylinder gas performance audit for rigid-container bag, syringe, or canister samp-
ling with on-site analysis consists of an on-site audit just prior to the analysis
of the emission samples. The recommended procedures for conducting the audit are
as follows:
1. The audit samples should be collected in the type of container that
will be used during the sample collection. However, to conserve on the
use of the audit gas(es), it is usually not necessary to use the rest
of the sampling system to collect the samples for unheated container
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.8
Date June 30, 1988
Page 3
FIELD AUDIT REPORT
Part A. - To be filled out by organization supplying audit cylinders.
1. Organization supplying audit sample(s) and shipping address
2. Audit supervisor, organization, and phone number
4.
5-
6.
Shipping instructions: Name, Address, Attention
/tettit Te-yh'ni. 100 Pnke Avf, SfevZ., /VC - X~.Af.
Guaranteed arrival date for cylinders -
Planned shipping date for cylinders -
Details on audit cylinders from last analysis
a. Date of last analysis. .....
b. Cylinder number
c. Cylinder pressure, psi
d. Audit gas (es) /balance gas..
e . Audit gas ( es ) , ppm
Low cone.
yW/C^gg
lOfrq.
IS'ltO
.£f^4.
...M....
High cone
• "z!%/*i
...M.....
Part B. - To be filled out by audit supervisor.
1. Process sampled
Audit location
2.
3-
4.
5-
Name of individual audit
Audit date
Audit Results:
b. Cylinder pressure before audit, psi
d. Measured concentration, ppm
Injection #1* Injection #2* Average
e. Actual audit concentration, ppm
f. Audit accuracy:1
Percent1 accuracy =
Measured Cone. - Actual Cone. x 100
Actual Cone.
Low
cone.
cylinder
/£&f
. y 5"fc£ .
'/s~p d '
J.4)/*+0
<*.**
»**£-
High
cone.
cylinder
/06&
-%£&-
2l2O/2,S4v
&?•
KM
1Results of two consecutive injections that meet the sample analysis
criteria of the test method.
Figure 8.1. Field audit report form.
-------
Section No. 3.16.8
Date June 30, 1988
Page 4
sampling. Problems related to the reaction or retention of the organic
compounds will still occur in the container. Other interferents in the
stack gas such as water vapor and other organics will not be present in
the audit cylinders and thus, related problems will not be assessed.
For heated container systems, it may be necessary to use the sampling
system to collect the audit gas. However, if the gases must be heated
to prevent condensation, it is likely that an audit gas cylinder will
not be available.
2. The audit samples should remain in the appropriate container approx-
imately the same length of time that the source samples will stay
prior to analysis. After! the preparation of the calibration curve, a
minimum of two consecutive analyses of each audit cylinder gas should
be conducted. The analyses must agree within 5# of the average. The
audit results should be calculated by the analyst (or representative)
and given to the audit supervisor. The audit supervisor will record
all the information and data on the"Field audit report form" and then
inform the analyst of the status of the audit. The equations for
calculation of error are included on the form.
Container (Bag and Canister) Sampling with Off-site Analysis - For cylinder gas
performance audits associated with rigid-container bag or canister samples that
are analyzed off-site, it is recommended that the audit be conducted off -site just
prior to the emission test (if the agency desires) and then repeated during the
off -site sample analysis as a quality control measure. The use of the pretest
audit will help ensure that the analytical system will be acceptable prior to
testing. Alternatively, the audit gas can be collected in the appropriate con-
tainer on-site or off -site, and then analyzed just prior to the analysis of the
field samples. It is recommended that the tester fill at least two containers with
the audit gas to guard against a leak causing a failed audit. Since the use of the
performance audit is to both assess and improve the data quality, the use of the
pretest audit will provide the tester /analyst with a better chance of obtaining
acceptable data. The recommended procedure for conducting the audit is the same as
above with the exception that the audit supervisor will likely not be present
during the audit and the data will be reported by telephone.
Direct Interface Sampling - Since direct interface sampling involves on-site
analysis , the performance audit is conducted on-site after the calibration of the
GC and prior to sampling. The audit gas cylinder is attached to the inlet of the
sampling probe. Two consecutive analyses of the audit gas must be within 5% of
the average of the two analyses. The tester /analyst then calculates the results
and informs the audit supervisor. The audit supervisor records all information and
results on the "Field audit report form" and then informs the tester/analyst as to
the acceptability of the results.
Dilution Interface Sampling - Since dilution interface sampling involves on-
site analysis, the performance audit is conducted on-site after the calibration of
the GC and prior to sampling. If the audit gas cylinder obtained has a concentra-
tion near the diluted sample concentration, the audit gas is introduced directly
into the sample port on the GC. If the audit gas cylinder obtained has a concen-
tration close to the expected sample concentration, then the audit gas is intro-
duced into the dilution system. The audit supervisor may wish to order one cylin-
der to assess both the dilution system and the analytical system and another cylin-
der to assess only the analytical system. Follow the same procedures described
/^\
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.8
Date June 30, 1988
Page 5
above for recording the information and reporting the results.
Adsorption Tube Sampling - The analysis for adsorption tube sampling is usually
conducted off-site. Therefore, the audit analysis is conducted off-site. Again,
the recommended procedure is to conduct the audit once prior to the test and again
following the test. Though the audit sample could be analyzed by direct
injection, the inclusion of the chromatogram printout in the report will prove that
the audit results were obtained through adsorption tube sampling and a solvent
extraction. Alternatively, the audit samples can be collected on-site or off-site
and then analyzed just prior to the analysis of the field samples. Since the audit
supervisor will likely not be present during the analysis, the results are reported
by telephone.
To collect the audit gas with the adsorption tube sampling train, connect a
sample "T" to the line from the audit gas cylinder. Place the adsorption tube
sampling system on one leg of the "T"; connect a rotameter to the other leg. With
the sampling system off, turn on the audit gas flow until the rotameter reads 2
1pm. Turn on the sampling system and sample the audit gas for the specified run
time. Approximately 1 1pm should be discharged through the rotameter.
8.1.2 Performance Audit of Data Processing - Calculation errors are prevalent in
processing data. Data processing errors can be determined by auditing the recorded
data on the field "and laboratory forms. The original and audit (check) calcula-
tions should agree within round-off error; if not, all of the remaining data should
be checked. The data processing may also be audited by providing the testing
laboratory with specific data sets (exactly as would appear in the field), and by
requesting that the data calculation be completed and that the results be returned
to the agency. This audit is useful in checking both computer programs and manual
methods of data processing.
8.2 Systems Audit
A systems audit is an on-site, qualitative inspection and review of the total
measurement system (sample collection, sample analysis, etc.). Initially, a
systems audit is recommended for each enforcement source test, defined here as a
series of three runs at one source. After the test team gains experience with the
method, the frequency of auditing may be reduced — for example, to once every four
tests.
The auditor should have extensive background experience in source sampling,
specifically with the measurement system being audited. The functions of the
auditor are summarized below:
1. Inform the testing team of the results of pretest audits, specifying any
area(s) that need special attention or improvement.
2. Observe procedures and techniques of the field team during sample collec-
tion.
3. Check/verify records of apparatus calibration checks and quality control
used in the laboratory analysis of control samples from previous source
tests, where applicable.
4. Record the results of the audit, and forward them with comments to the
test team management so that appropriate corrective action may be
initiated.
While on site, the auditor observes the source test team's overall perfor-
mance, including the following specific operations:
-------
Section No. 3.16.8
Date June 30, 1988
Page 6
1. Conducting the GC calibration and conducting the performance audit (if the
analysis is conducted on-site).
2. Setting up and leak testing the sampling train.
3. Collecting the sample at a proportional rate (if applicable) or constant
rate at the specified flow rate.
4. Conducting the final leak check and recovery of the samples.
5. Conducting the initial and final check on the dilution system (if appli-
cable) .
6. Sample documentation procedures, sample recovery, and preparation of
samples for shipment (if applicable).
7- Conducting sample analyses (if conducted on-site).
Figure 8.2 is a suggested checklist for the auditor.
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.8
Date June 30, 1988
Page 7
Yes
^
~7
S
,
,/
_k^
IX"
tX"
l/>
!/
^x
s
-VL.
IS
/
7?
No
^
><•
X
^
X
^
X
y/- /v
Comments
^
WA
$<*$ ftck
J^jL^^eoi
+-5-.S/0 %
'
fJ/A
A//A
N/L.
///A
rfffl
M/A
V/A
A//A-
X/A
0n -?/'/£
^ jj •. ^ . jj^ ^p X^
^^-s/Xe—^^
<^
^j/C
/^C/A /\^c* S"
Vjvjr ///yc^^c
Operation
PRESAMPLING PREPARATION
1. Knowledge of process operations
2. Results of pretest audit (+ 10% or other value)
3- Calibration of pertinent equipment, in
particular, dry gas meters and other flowmeters
4. Selection and checkout of equipment for proper
sampling and analytical techniques
BAGS - reactivity, condensation, & retention
ADSORPTION TUBES - adsorption & desorption
efficiency
DILUTION SYSTEM - dilution ratio
GC/COLUMN - adequate resolution
GC/DETECTOR - acceptable accuracy & precision
ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
5- Results of on-site audit (+ 10% or other value)
6. Sampling system properly assembled
7. Based on pitot tube check, is proportional
sampling required (more than 10% flow change)
8. Dilution system check acceptable (if applicable)
9. Sampling system leak check acceptable
10. Proportional sampling properly conducted
11. Constant rate sampling properly conducted
12. Heater systems maintained at proper temperatures
13. Proper number of samples & sampling time
14. GC properly calibrated
15. Duplicate injections had acceptable precision <5%
16. Recording of pertinent process conditions during
sample collection, samples properly identified,
and calculations properly conducted
POSTSAMPLING
17. Results of off -site audit (+ 10% or other value)
18. GC properly calibrated
19. Duplicate injections had acceptable precision <5%
20. Adsorption efficiency accep table, > 90% on primary
21. Desorption efficiency acceptable, > 50% recovery
22. Adequate peak resolution
23. Bags passed reaction check, less than 10% change
24. Bags passed retention check, less than 5% retained
25. Flowmeters recalibration acceptable
26. Temperature sensor recalibration acceptable
COMMENTS
re0££.£e.£t fcbU .
Figure 8.2. Method 18 checklist to be used by auditors.
-------
Section No. 3.16.8
Date June 30, 1988
Page 8
Table 8.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR AUDITING PROCEDURES
o
Apparatus
Performance
audit of
analytical phase
Data processing
errors
Systems audit—
observance
of technique
Acceptance limits
Measured relative
error of audit
samples less than
10% (or other stated
value) for both
samples
Original and checked
calculations agree
within round-off
error
Operational tech-
nique as described
in this section of
the Handbook
Frequency and method
of measurement
Frequency; Once during
every enforcement
source test*
Method; Measure audit
samples and compare
results to true values
Frequency; Once during
every enforcement
source test*
Method; Independent
calculations starting
with recorded data
Frequency; Once during
every enforcement
source test* until
experience gained,
then every fourth
test
Method; Observation of
techniques assisted
by audit checklist,
Figure 8.1
Action if
requirements
are not met
Review operating
technique and
repeat audit
Check and correct
all data for the
audit period
represented by
the sampled data
Explain to team
their deviations
from recommended
techniques and
note on Fig 8.1
O
*As defined here, a source test for enforcement of the NSPS comprises a series of
runs at one source. Source test for purposes other than enforcement of NSPS may
be audited at the frequency determined by the applicable group.
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.9
Date June 30, 1988
Page 1
9.0 RECOMMENDED STANDARDS FOR ESTABLISHING TRACEABILITY
To achieve data of desired quality, two essential considerations are
necessary: (1) the measurement process must bu in a state of statistical control
at the time of the measurement, and (2) the systematic errors, when combined with
the random variation (errors or measurment), must result in an acceptable
uncertainty. As evidence in support of good quality data, it is necessary to
perform qulaity control checks and independent audits of the measurement process;
to document these data; and to use materials, instruments, and measurement
procedures that can be traced to an apropriate standard of reference.
Data must be routinely obtained by repeat measurements of standar reference
samples (primary, secondary, and/or working standards) and the establishment of a
condition of process control. The working calibration standards should be
traceable to standards of higher accuracy.
Audit samples (as discussed in Section 3-16.8) must be used to validate test
results for compliance determination purposes and are recommendeed as an
independent check on the measurement process when the method is performed for other
purposes.
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3-16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 1
10.0 REFERENCE METHOD*
Since the initial promulgation of Method 18 in 1983 (48 FR, 48344 - 48360,
10/18/83), there have been a number of revisions and additions to the method. In
the interest of consistency and clarity, the version of Method 18 reproduced here
is from the most recent edition of the Code of Federal Regulations which
incorporates all promulgated changes to this date.
METHOD IB—MEASUREMENT or GASEOUS OR-
GAWIC CoMTOtmn EMISSIONS BV GAS CKRO-
MATOORAPHY
Introduction
This method should not be attempted by
persons unfamiliar with the performance
characteristics of gas chromatography. nor
by those persons who are unfamiliar with
source sampling. Particular care should be
exercised In the area of safety concerning
choice of equipment and operation In poten-
tially explosive atmospheres.
1. Applicability and Principle
1.1 Applicability. This method applies to
the analysis of approximately 00 percent of
the total gaseous organlcs emitted from an
Industrial source. It does not include tech-
niques to Identify and measure trace
amounts of organic compounds, such as
those found In building air and fugitive
emission sources.
This method will not determine com-
pounds that (1) are polymeric (high molecu-
lar weight). (2) can polymerize before analy-
sis, or (3) have very low vapor pressures at
stack or Instrument conditions.
1.2 Principle.
The major organic components of a gas
mixture are separated by gas chromatogra-
phy (GO and Individually quantified by
flame lonization, photolonization, electron
capture, or other appropriate detection
principles.
The retention times of each separated
component are compared with those of
known compounds under identical condi-
tions. Therefore, the analyst confirms the
identity and approximate concentrations of
the organic emission components before-
hand. With this Information, the analyst
then prepares or purchases commercially
available standard mixtures to calibrate the
GC under conditions identical to those of
the samples. The analyst also determines
the need for sample dilution to avoid detec-
tor saturation, gas stream filtration to elimi-
nate paniculate matter, and prevention of
moisture condensation.
2. Range and Sensitivity
2.1 Range. The range of this method Is
from about 1 part per million (ppm) to the
upper limit governed by GC detector satura-
tion or column overloading. The upper limit
can be extended by diluting the stack gases
with an inert gas or by using smaller gas
sampling loops.
2.2 Sensitivity. The sensitivity limit for a
compound Is defined as the minimum de-
tectable concentration of that compound, or
the concentration that produces a slgn&l-to-
noise ratio of three to one. The minimum
detectable concentration Is determined
during the presurvey calibration for each
compound.
3. Precision and Accuracy
Gas chromatographlc techniques typically
provide a precision of 5 to 10 percent rela-
tive standard deviation (RSD), but an expe-
rienced GC operator with a reliable instru-
ment can readily achieve 6 percent RSD.
For thla method, the following combined
GC/operator values are required.
(a) Precision. Duplicate analyses are
within 5 percent of their mean value.
(b) Accuracy. Analysis results of prepared
audit samples are within 10 percent of prep-
aration values.
4. Interferences
Resolution interferences that may occur
can be eliminated by appropriate GC
column and detector choice or by shifting
the retention times through changes In the
column flow rate and the use of tempera-
ture programming.
The analytical system is demonstrated to
b« essentially free from contaminants by pe-
riodically analyzing blanks that consist of
hydrocarbon-free air or nitrogen.
Sample cross-contamination that occurs
when high-level and low-level samples or
standards are analyzed alternately, is best
dealt with by thorough purging of the GC
sample loop between samples.
To assure consistent detector response,
calibration gases are contained In dry air.
To adjust gaseous organic concentrations
when water vapor is present In the sample.
water vapor concentrations are determined
for those samples, and a correction factor Is
applied.
S. Presurvey and Presurvey Sampling.
Perform a presurvey for each source to be
tested. Refer to Figure 18-1. Some of the in-
formation can be collected from literature
surveys and source personnel. Collect gas
samples that can be analyzed to confirm the
Identities and approximate concentrations
of the organic emissions.
5.1 Apparatus. This apparatus list also
applies to Sections 6 and 7.
'40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 18, July 1, 198?, pages ?40 - ?69-
-------
Section No. 3.16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 2
5.1.1 Tenon Tubing. (Mention of trade
names or specific products does not consti-
tute endorsement by the U.8. Environmen-
tal Protection Agency.) Diameter and
length determined by connection require-
ments of cylinder regulators and the OC.
Additional tubing Is necessary to connect
the OC sample loop to the sample.
5.1.2 Gas Chromatograph. GO with suit-
able detector, columns, temperature-con-
trolled sample loop and valve assembly, and
temperature programable oven. If necessary.
The GC shall achieve sensitivity require-
ments for the compounds under study.
5.1.3 Pump. Capable of pumping 100 ml/
mln. For flushing sample loop.
5.1.4 Flowmeters. To measure flow rates.
5.1.5 Regulators. Used on EOS cylinders
for GC and for cylinder standards.
5.1.6 Recorder. Recorder with linear strip
chart Is minimum acceptable. Integrator
(optional) Is recommended.
5.1.7 Syringes. 0.5-ml, 1.0- and 10-mlcro-
liter sizes, calibrated, maximum accuracy
(gas tight), for preparing calibration stand-
ards. Other appropriate sizes can be used.
5.1.8 Tubing Fittings. To plumb GC and
gas cylinders.
5.1.9 Septums. For syringe Injections.
5.1.10 Glass Jars. If necessary, clean-col-
ored glass Jars with Teflon-lined lids for
condensatj sample collection. Size depends
on volume of condensate.
5.1.11 Soap Film Flow Meter. To deter-
mine flow rates.
5.1.12 Tedlar Bags. 10- and 50-liter capac-
ity, for preparation of standards.
5.1.13 Dry Gas Meter with Temperature
and Pressure Gauges. Accurate to ±2 per-
cent, for perparatlon of gas standards.
5.1.14 Midget Implnger/Hot Plate As-
sembly. For preparation of gas standards.
5.1.15 Sample Flasks. For presurvey sam-
ples, must have gas-tight seals.
5.1.16 Adsorption Tubes. If necessary,
blank tubes filled with necessary adsorberd
(charcoal, Tenax, XAD-2, etc.) for presur-
vey samples.
5.1.17 Personnel Sampling Pump. Cali-
brated, for collecting adsorbent tube presur-
vey samples.
5.1.18 Dilution System. Calibrated, the
dilution system Is to be constructed follow-
ing the specifications of an acceptable
method.
5.1.19 Sample Probes. Pyrex or stainless
steel, of sufficient length to reach centrold
of stack, or a point no closer to the walls
than 1 m.
5.1.20 Barometer. To measure barometric
pressure.
5.2 Reagents.
5.2.1 Dslonized Distilled Water.
5.2.2 Methylene Dlchloride.
5.2.3 Calibration Gases. A series of stand-
ards prepared for every compound of inter-
eat.
5.2.4 Organic Compound Solutions. Pure
(09.0 percent), or as pure as can reasonably
be obtained, liquid samples of all the organ-
ic compounds needed to prepare calibration
standards.
5.2.5 Extraction Solvents. For extraction
of adsorbent tube samples In preparation
for analysis.
5.2.6 Fuel. As recommended by the man-
ufacturer for operation of the GC.
5.2.7 Carrier Gas. Hydrocarbon free, as
recommended by the manufacturer for op-
eration of the detector and compatability
with the column.
5.2.8 Zero Gas. Hydrocarbon free air or
nitrogen, to be used for dilutions, blank
preparation, and standard preparation.
5.3 Sampling.
8.3.1 Collection of Samples with Glass
Sampling Flasks. Presurvey samples can be
collected In precleaned 250-ml double-ended
glass sampling flasks. Teflon stopcocks,
without grease, are preferred. Flasks should
be cleaned as follows: Remove the stopcocks
from both ends of the flasks, and wipe the
parts to remove any grease. Clean the stop-
cocks, barrels, and receivers with methylene
dlchloride. Clean all glass ports with a soap
solution, then rinse with tap and delonlzed
distilled water. Place the flask In a cool
glass annealing furnace and apply heat up
to 500* C. Maintain at this temperature for
1 hour. Afte? this time period, shut off and
open the furnace to allow the flask to cool.
Grease the stopcocks with stopcock grease
end return them to the flask receivers.
Purse the assembly with high-purity nitrcX*^*\
sen for 2 to 5 minutes. Close off the stoi )
cocks after purging to maintain a slIjtiL J
positive nitrogen pressure. Secure the stop-*—'
cocks with tape.
Presurvey samples can be obtained either
by drawing the eases Into the previously
evacuated flask or by drawing the gases into
and purging the flask with a rubber suctlor.
bulb.
5.3.1.1 Evacuated Flask Procedure. Use a
high-vacuum pump to evacuate the flask to
the capacity of the pump; then close off the
stopcock leading to the pump. Attach a 6-
mm outside diameter (OD) glass tee to the
flask inlet with a short piece of Teflon
tubing. Select a 6-mm OD borosillcate sam-
pling probe, enlarged at one end to a 12-mm
OD and of sufficient length to reach the
centrold of the duct to be sampled. Insert a
glass wool plug In the enlarged end of the
probe to remove particulate matter. Attach
the other end of the probe to the tee with a
short piece of Teflon tubing. Connect a
rubber suction bulb to the third leg of the
tee. Place the filter end of the probe at the
centrold of the duct, or at a point no closer
to the walls than 1 m, and purge the probe
with the rubber suction bulb. After the
probe Is completely purged and filled with
duct eases, open the stopcock to the grab
flask until the pressure In the flask reaches
duct pressure. Close off the stopcock, and
remove the probe from the duct. Remove
the tee from the flask and tape the stop-
cocks to prevent leaks during shipment.
Measure and record the duct temperature
and pressure.
5.3.1.2 Purged Flask Procedure. Attach
one end of the sampling flask to a rubber
suction bulb. Attach the other end to a 6
mm OD glass probe as described in
-------
Section No. 3.16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 3
5.3.1.1. Place the filter end of the probe at
the centrold of the duct, or at a point no
closer to the walls than 1 m. and apply suc-
tion with the bulb to completely purge the
probe and flask. After the flask has been
purged, close off the stopcock near the suc-
tion bulb, and then close the stopcock near
the probe. Remove the probe from the duct,
and disconnect both the probe and suction
bulb. Tape the stopcocks to prevent leakage
during shipment. Measure and record the
duct temperature and pressure.
5.3.2 Flexible Bag Procedure. Tedlar or
aluminlzed Mylar bags can also be used to
obtain the presurvey sample. Use new bags.
and leak check them before field use. In ad-
dition, check the bag before use for con-
tamination by filling it with nitrogen or air,
and analyzing the gas by GC at high sensi-
tivity. Experience indicates that it is desira-
ble to allow the inert gas to remain in the
bag about 24 hours or longer to check for
desorption of organlcs from the bag. Follow
the leak check and sample collection proce-
dures given in Section 7.1.
5.3.3 Determination of Moisture Content.
For combustion or water-controlled process-
es, obtain the moisture content from plant
personnel or by measurement during the
presurvey. If the source is below 59' C,
measure the wet bulb and dry bulb tempera-
tures, and calculate the moisture content
using a psychrometric chart. At higher tern
peratures, use Method 4 to determine the
moisture content.
5.4 Determination of Static Pressure.
Obtain the static pressure from the plant
personnel or measurement. If a type S pltot
tube and an inclined manometer are used,
take care to align the pilot tube 90' from
the direction of the flow. Disconnect one of
the tubes to the manometer, and read the
static pressure; note whether the reading is
positive or negative.
5.5 Collection of Presurvey Samples with
Adsorption Tube. Follow Section 7.4 for pre-
survey sampling.
6. Analysis Development
6.1 Selection of GC Parameters.
6.1.1 Column Choice. Based on the initial
contact with plant personnel concerning the
plant process and the anticipated emissions,
choose a column that provides good resolu-
tion and rapid analysis time. The choice of
an appropriate column can be aided by a lit-
erature search, contact with manufacturers
of GC columns, and discussion with person-
nel at the emission source.
Most column manufacturers keep excel-
lent records of their products. Their techni-
cal service departments may be able to rec-
ommend appropriate columns and detector
type for separating the anticipated com-
pounds, and they may be able to provide In-
formation on Interferences, optimum oper-
ating conditions, and column limitations.
Plants with analytical laboratories may
also be able to provide information on ap-
propriate analytical procedures.
6.1.2 Preliminary GC Adjustment. Using
the standards and column obtained In Sec-
tion 6.1.1, perform initial tests to determine
appropriate GC conditions that provide
good resolution and minimum analysis time
for the compounds of interest.
6.1.3 Preparation of Presurvey Samples.
If the samples were collected on an adsorb-
ent, extract the sample as recommended by
the manufacturer for removal of the com-
pounds with a solvent suitable to the type
of QC analysis. Prepare other samples In an
appropriate manner.
6.1.4 Presurvey Sample Analysis. Before
analysis, heat the presurvey sample to the
duct temperature to vaporize any condensed
material. Analyze the samples by the GC
procedure, and compare the retention times
against those of the calibration samples
that contain the components expected to be
In the stream. If any compounds cannot be
Identified with certainty by this procedure.
Identify them by other means such as GC/
mass spectroscopy (GC/MS) or GC/lnfrared
techniques. A GC/MS system is recom-
mended.
Use the GC conditions determined by the
procedures of Section 6.1.2 for the first in-
jection. Vary the GC parameters during
subsequent Injections to determine the opti-
mum settings. Once the optimum settings
have been determined, perform repeat Injec-
tions of the sample to determine the reten-
tion time of each compound. To inject a
sample, draw sample through the loop at a
constant rate (100 ml/mln for 30 seconds).
Be careful not to pressurize the gas In the
loop. Turn off the pump and allow the gas
In the sample loop to come to ambient pres-
sure. Activate the sample valve, and record
Injection time, loop temperature, column
temperature, carrier flow rate, chart speed,
and attenuator setting. Calculate the reten-
tion time of each peak using the distance
from injection to the peak maximum divid-
ed by the chart speed. Retention times
should be repeatable within 0.5 seconds.
If the concentrations are too high for ap-
propriate detector response, a smaller
sample loop or dilutions may be used for gas
samples, and, for liquid samples, dilution
with solvent is appropriate. Use the stand-
ard curves (Section 6.3) to obtain an esti-
mate of the concentrations.
Identify all peaks by comparing the
known retention times of compounds ex-
pected to be in the retention times of peaks
in the sample. Identify any remaining un-
identified peaks which -have areas larger
than 5 percent of the total using a GC/MS,
or estimation of possible compounds by
their retention times compared to known
compounds, with confirmation by further
GC analysis.
6.2 Calibration Standards. Prepare or
obtain enough calibration standards so that
there are three different concentrations of
each organic compound expected to be
measured in the source sample. For each or-
ganic compound, select those concentrations
that bracket the concentrations expected in
the source samples. A calibration standard
may contain more than one organic com-
pound. If available, commercial cylinder
gases may be used if their concentrations
have been certified by direct analysis.
If samples are collected in adsorbent tubes
(charcoal, XAD-2, Tenax, etc.), prepare or
obtain standards In the same solvent used
for the sample extraction procedure. Refer
to Section 7.4.3.
-------
Section No. 3.16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 4
o
Verify the stability of all standards for
the time periods they are used. If gas stand-
ards are prepared in the laboratory, use one
or more of the following procedures.
6.2.1 Preparation of Standards from
High Concentration Cylinder Standards.
Obtain enough high concentration cylinder
standards to represent ail the organic com-
pounds expected in the. source samples.
Use these high concentration standards to
prepare lower concentration standards by
dilution, as shown by Figures 18-5 and 18-6.
To prepare the diluted calibration sam-
ples, calibrated rotameters are normally
used to meter both the high concentration
calibration gas and the diluent gas. Other
types of flowmeters and commercially avail-
able dilution systems can also be used.
Calibrate each flowmeter before use by
placing It between the diluent gas supply
and suitably sized bubble meter, splrometer.
or wet test meter. Record all data shown on
Figure 18-4. While it is desirable to calibrate
the cylinder gas flowmeter with cylinder
gas, the available quantity and cost may
preclude it. The error Introduced by using
the diluent gas for calibration is insignifi-
cant for gas mixtures of up to 1,000 to 2,000
ppm of each organic component.
Once the flowmeters are calibrated, con-
nect the flowmeters to the calibration and
diluent gas supplies using 0-mm Teflon
tubing. Connect the outlet side of the flow-
meters through a connector to a leak-free
Tedlar bag as shown in Figure 18-5. (See
Section 7.1 for bag leak-check procedures.)
Adjust the gas flow to provide the desired
dilution, and fill the bag with sufficient gas
for OC calibration. Be careful not to overfill
and cause the bag to apply additional pres-
sure on the dilution system. Record the flow
rates of both flowmeters, and the laborato-
ry temperature and atmospheric pressure.
Calculate the concentration C. In ppm of
each organic in the diluted gas as follows:
1C)
6
<> *
Eq. 18-1
where:
10'—Conversion to ppm.
X-Mole or volume fraction of the organic
in the calibration gas to be diluted.
q»-Flow rate of the calibration gas to be di-
luted.
q^x Diluent gas flow rate.
Single-stage dilutions should be used to pre-
pare calibration mixtures up to about 1:20
dilution factor.
For greater dilutions, a double dilution
system is recommended, as shown in Figure
18-6. Fill the Tedlar bag with the dilute gas
from the second stage. Record the laborato-
ry temperature, barometric pressure, and
static pressure readings. Correct the flow
reading for temperature and pressure. Cal-
culate the concentration C, in ppm of the
organic in the final gas mixture as follows:
Eq. 18-2
Where:
10*<> Conversion to ppm.
X-Mole or volume fraction of the organic
In the calibration gas to be diluted.
Ha -Flow rate of the calibration gas to be di-
luted in stage 1.
q^i-Flow rate of the calibration gas to be di-
luted In stage 2.
CU-Flow rate of diluent gas in stage 1.
dA-Flow rate of diluent gas In stage 2.
Further details of the calibration methods
for flowmeters and the dilution system can
be found in Citation 21 in the Bibliography.
6.2.2 Preparation of Standards from
Volatile Materials. Record all data shown on
Figure 18-3.
6.2.2.1 Oas Injection Technique. This
procedure b applicable to organic com-
pounds that exist entirely as a cas at ambi-
ent conditions. Evacuate a 10-liter Tedlar
bae that has passed a leak-check
-------
Section No. 3.16.10,,
Date June 30, 1988
Page 5 f
where:
G.-Gas volume or organic compound In-
jected, ml.
»•-Conversion to ppm.
P.-Absolute pressure of syringe before In-
Jectlon. mm He.
T.-Ateolute temperature of syringe before
Injection. '1C.
V.-Gas volume Indicated by dry gas meter.
liters.
Y-Dry gas meter calibration factor, dimen-
sionleEs.
P.-Absolute pressure of dry gas meter, mm
Hg.
T.-Absolute temperature of dry gas meter.
•K.
1000-Conversion factor, ml/liter.
6.2.2.2 Liquid Injection Technique. Use
the equipment shown in Figure 18-8. Cali-
brate the dry gas meter as described in Sec-
tion 6.2.2.1 with a wet test meter or a spl-
rometer. Use a water manometer for the
pressure gauge and glass. Teflon, braes, or
stainless steel for all connections. Connect a
valve to the inlet of the SO-llter Tedlar bag.
To prepare the standards, assemble the
equipment as shown in Figure 18-8, and
leak-check the system. Completely evacuate
the bag. Fill the bag with hydrocarbon-free
air, and evacuate the bag again. Close the
inlet valve.
Turn on the hot plate, and allow the
,ter to reach boiling, Connect the bag to
s impinger outlet. Record the Initial
'eter reading, open the bag inlet valve, and
open the cylinder. Adjust the rate so that
the bag will be completely filled in approxi-
mately 15 minutes.'Record meter pressure
and temperature, and local barometric pres-
sure.
Allow the liquid organic to equilibrate to
room temperature. Fill the 1.0- or 10-micro-
liter syringe to the desired liquid volume
with the organic. Place the syringe needle
Into the impinger inlet using the septum
provided, and Inject the liquid Into the flow-
Ing air stream. Use a needle of sufficient
length to permit Injection of the liquid
below the air inlet branch of the tee.
Remove the syringe.
When the bag is filled, stop the pump, and
close the bag inlet valve. Record the final
meter reading, temperature, and pressure.
Disconnect the bag from the Impinger
outlet, and either set it aside for at least 1
hour, or massage the bag to Insure complete
mixing.
Measure the solvent liquid density at
room temperature by accurately weighing a
known volume of the material on an analyt-
ical balance to the nearest 1.0 milligram. A
ground-glass stoppered 25-mil volumetric
flask or a glass-stoppered specific gravity
bottle is suitable for weighing. Calculate the
result in terms of g/ml. As an alternative,
literature values of the density of the liquid
at 20 *C may be used.
Calculate each organic standard concen-
tration C. in ppm as follows:
Lv D (24.055 x 106)
M
100°
= 6.24 x 10
Y P
Eq. 18-4
where:
L,-Uquid volume of organic injected, pi.
pi-Liquid organic density as determined, E/
ml.
M« Molecular weight of organic, g/g-mole.
24.055-Ideal gas molar volume at 293 *K
and 760 mm He, liters/g-mole.
101-Conversion to ppm.
1CCO-Conversion factor, jd/mL
6.3 Preparation of Calibration Curves.
Establish proper GC conditions, then flush
the campling loop for 30 seconds at a rate of
100 ml/mln. Allow the sample loop pressure
to equilibrate to atmospheric pressure, and
activate the injection valve. Record the
standard concentration, attenuator factor,
injection time, chart speed, retention time.
peak area, sample loop temperature, column
temperature, and carrier gas flow rate.
Repeat the standard Injection until two con-
secutive Injections give area counts within S
percent of their average. The average value
multipled by the attenuator factor is then
the calibration area value for the concentra-
tion.
Repeat this procedure for each standard.
Prepare a graphical plot of concentration
(C,) versus the calibration area values. Per-
form a regression analysis, and draw the
least squares line.
6.4 Relative Response Factors. The cali-
bration curve generated from the standards
for a single organic can usually be related to
each of the Individual GC response curves
that are developed In the laboratory for all
the compounds In the source. In the field,
standards for that single organic can then
be used to "calibrate" the GC for all the or-
ganics present. This procedure should first
be confirmed in the laboratory by preparing
and analyzing calibration standards contain-
ing multiple organic compounds.
6.5 Quality Assurance for Laboratory
Procedures. Immediately after the prepara-
tion of the calibration curves and prior to
the presurvey sample analysis, the analysis
audit described In 40 CFR Part 61. Appen-
dix C, Procedure 2: "Procedure for Field Au-
diting OC Analysis," should be performed.
The information required to document the
analysis of the audit samples has been In-
cluded on the example data sheets shown in
Figures 18-3 and 18-7. The audit analyses
should agree with the audit concentrations
within 10 percent. When available, the
tester may obtain audit cylinders by con-
tacting: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Environmental Monitoring Systems
-------
Laboratory. Quality Assurance Division
(MD-77), Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina 27711. Audit cylinders obtained
from a commercial gas manufacturer may
be used provided that (a) the gas manufac-
turer certifies the audit cylinder In a
manner similar to the procedure described
In 40 CFR Part 61. Appendix B, Method 108.
Section 5.2.3.1, end (b) the gas manufactur-
er obtains an Independent analysis of the
audit cylinders to verify this analysis. Inde-
pendent analysis Is defined as an analysis
performed by an Individual other than the
individual who performs the eta manufac-
turer's analysis, while using calibration
standards and analysis equipment different
from those used for the gas manufacturer's
analysis. Verification is complete and ac-
ceptable when the Independent analysis
concentration is within S percent of the fas
manufacturer's concentration.
7. Final Sampling and Analytit Procedure
Considering safety (flams hessrds) and
the source conditions, select an appropriate
sampling and analysis procedure (Section
7.1,7.2,7.3, or 7.4). In situations where & hy-
drogen flame la a hazard and no intrinsical-
ly safe OC is suitable, use the flexible bag
collection technique or an adsorption tech-
nique. It the source temperature is below
100'C, and the organic concentrations are
suitable for the detector to be used, use the
direct Interface method. If the source cases
require dilution, use a dilution Interface and
either the bag sample or adsorption tubes.
The choice between these two techniques
will depend on the physical layout of the
site, the source temperature, and the stor-
age stability of the compounds If collected
in the bag. Sample polar compounds by
direct interfacing or dilution Interfacing to
prevent sample loss by adsorption on the
bag.
7.1 Integrated Bag Sampling and Analy-
sis.
7.1.1 Evacuated Container Sampling Pro-
cedure. In this procedure, the bags are filled
by evacuating the rigid air-tight containers
that hold the bags. Uss a field sample data
sheet as shown In Figure 18-10. Collect trip-
licate sample from each sample location.
7.1.1.1 Apparatus.
7.1.1.1.1 Probe. Stainless steel, Pyrex
glass, or Teflon tubing probe, according to
the duet temperature, with 6.4-mm OD
Teflon tubing of sufficient length to con-
nect to the sample bag. Use stainless steel or
Teflon unions to connect probe and sample
line.
7.1.1.1.2 Quick Connects. Male (2) and
female (2) of stainless steel construction.
7.1.1.1.3 Needle Valve. To control CM
flow.
7.1.1.1.4 Pump. Leakless Teflon-coated
diaphragm-type pump or equivalent. To de-
liver at least 1 liter/mln.
7.1.1.1.6 Charcoal Adsorption Tube. Tube
filled with activated charcoal, with glass
wool plugs at each end, to adsorb organic
vapors.
7.1.1.1.6 Flowmet«r. 0 to 800-ml flow
range: with manufacturer's calibration
curve.
Section No. 3.16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 6
7.1.1.2 Sampling Procedure. To obtain a
sample, assemble the sample train as shown
in Figure 18-0. Leak check both the bag and
the container. Connect the vacuum line
from the needle valve to the Teflon sample
line from the probe. Place the end of the
probe at the centrold of the stack, or at a
point no closer to the walls than 1 m, and
start the pump with the needle valve adjust-
ed to yield a flow of 0.5 liter/minute. After
allowing sufficient time to purge the line
several times, connect the vacuum line to
the bag, and evccuate until the rotamcter
Indicates no flow. Then position the sample
and vacuum lines for sampling, and begin
th« actual sampling, keeping the rate pro-
portional to the Bluet velocity. As a precau-
tion, direct the gas exiting the rotameter
away from sampling personnel. At the end
of the sample period, shut off the pump,
disconnect the sample line from the bag,
and disconnect the vacuum line from the
bag container. Record the source tempera-
ture, barometric pressure, ambient tempera-
ture, sampling flow rate, and Initial and
final sampling time on the data sheet shown
in Figure 18-10. Protect the Tedlar bag and
Ito container from sunlight. When possible,
perform the analysis within 2 hours of
sample collection.
7.1.2 Direct Pump Sampling Procedure.
Follow 7.1.1, except place the pump and
needle valve between the probe and the bag.
Ues a pump and needle valve constructed of
stainless steel or some other material not af-
fected by the stack gas. Leak check the
system, end then purge with stack gas
before the connecting to the previously
evacuated bag.
7.1.3 Explosion Risk Area Bag Sampling
Procedure. Follow 7.1.1 except replace the
pump with another evacuated can (see
Figure 18-Oa). Use this method whenever
there Is a possibility of an explosion due to
pumps, heated probes, or other flame pro-
ducing equipment.
7.1.4 Other Modified Bag Sampling Pro-
cedures. In the event that condensation is
observed in the bag while collecting the
sample and a direct interface system cannot
be used, heat the bag during collection, and
maintain It at a suitably elevated tempera-
ture during all subsequent operations.
(Note: Take care to leak check the system
prior to the dilutions so as not to create a
potentially explosive atmosphere.) As an al-
ternative, collect the sample gas, and simul-
taneously dilute It in the Tedlar bag.
In the first procedure, heat the box con-
taining the sample bag to the source tem-
perature, provided the components of the
bag and the surrounding box can withstand
this temperature. Then transport the bag as
rapidly as possible to the analytical area
while maintaining the heating, or cover the
box with an Insulating blanket. In the ana-
lytical area, keep the box heated to source
temperature until analysis. Be sure that the
method of heating the box and the control
for the heating circuit are compatible with
the safety restrictions required in each area.
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3-16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 7
To use the second procedure, preflll the
Tedlar bag with a known quantity of Inert
etas. Meter the Inert gas Into the bag accord-
Ing to the procedure for the preparation of
gas concentration standards of volatile
liquid materials (Section 6.2.2.2). but elimi-
nate the midget Impincer section. Take the
partly filled bag to the source, and meter
the source gas Into the bag through heated
sampling lines and a heated flowmeter. er
Tenon positive displacement pump. Verify
the dilution factors periodically through di-
lution and analysis of gases of known con-
centration.
7.1.5 Analysis Of Bag Samples.
7.1.5.1 Apparatus. Same as Section 5. A
minimum of three gas standards are re-
quired.
7.1.5.2 Procedure. Establish proper OC
operating conditions as described in Section
6.3. and record all data listed in Figure 18-7.
Prepare the GC so that gas can be drawn
through the sample valve. Flush the sample
loop with gas from one of the three calibra-
tion mixtures, and activate the valve.
Obtain at least two chromatograms for the
mixture. The results are acceptable when
the peak areas from two consecutive Injec-
tions agree to within 5 percent of their aver-
age. If they do not, run additional analyses
or correct the analytical techniques until
this requirement is met. Then analyze the
other two calibration mixtures in the same
manner. Prepare a calibration curve as de-
scribed In the same manner. Prepare a cali-
bration curve as described In Section 6.3.
Analyze the source gas samples by con-
necting each bag to the sampling valve with
a piece of Tenon tubing Identified for that
bag. Follow the specifications on replicate
analyses specified for the calibration gases.
Record the data listed in Figure 18-11. If
certain Items do not apply, use the notation
"N,A." After all samples have been ana-
lyzed, repeat the analyses of the calibration
gas mixtures, and generate a second calibra-
tion curve. Use an average of the two curves
to determine the sample gas concentrations.
If the two calibration curves differ by more
than 5 percent from their mean value, then
report the final results by comparison to
both calibration curves.
7.1.6 Determination of Bag Water Vapor
Content. Measure and record the ambient
temperature and barometric pressure near
the bag. From a water saturation vapor
pressure table, determine and record the
water vapor content as a decimal figure.
(Assume the relative humidity to be 100 per-
cent unless a lesser value Is known.) If the
bag has been maintained at an elevated tem-
perature as described In Section 7.1.4, deter-
mine the stack gas water content by Method
4.
7.1.7 Quality Assurance. Immediately
prior to the analysis of the stack gas sam-
ples, perform audit analyses as described In
Section 6.5. The audit analyses must agree
with the audit concentrations within 10 per-
cent. If the results are acceptable, proceed
with the analyses of the source samples. If
they do not agree within 10 percent, then
determine the reason for the discrepancy,
and take corrective action before proceed-
ing.
d-Bws)
18-5
7.1.8 Emission Calculations. From the av-
erage calibration curve described In Section
7.1.5., select the value of C, that corresponds
to the peak area. Calculate the concentra-
tion C, In ppm, dry basis, of each organic In
the sample as follows:
c - csprT1Fr
LC " TT
where:
C.- Concentration of the organic from the
calibration curve, ppm.
P,«Reference pressure, the barometric
pressure or absolute sample loop pres-
sure recorded during calibration, mm
Hg.
TI-Sample loop temperature at the time of
sample analysis, 'K.
Fr-Relative response factor (if applicable,
see Section 6.4).
Pi-Barometric or absolute sample loop
pressure at time of sample analysis, mm
Hg.
T,-Reference temperature, the tempera-
ture of the sample loop recorded during
calibration,'K.
B.," Water vapor content of the bag sample
or stack gas, proportion by volume.
7.2 Direct Interface Sampling and Analy-
sis Procedure. The direct Interface proce-
dure can be used provided that the moisture
content of the gas does not interfere with
the analysis procedure, the physical require-
ments of the equipment can be met at the
site, and the source gas concentration Is low
enough that detector saturation Is not a
problem. Adhere to all safety requirements
with this method.
7.2.1 Apparatus.
7.2.1.1 Probe. Constructed of stainless
steel, Pyrex glass, or Teflon tubing as re-
quired by duct temperature, 6.4-mm OD, en-
larged at duct end to contain glass wool
plug. If necessary, heat the probe with heat-
Ins tape or a special heating unit capable of
maintaining duct temperature.
7.2.1.2 Sample Lines. 6.4-mm OD Teflon
lines, heat-traced to prevent condensation
of material.
7.2.1.3 Quick Connects. To connect
sample line to gas sampling valve on GC In-
strument and to pump unit used to with-
draw source gas. Use a quick connect or
equivalent on the cylinder or bag containing
calibration gas to allow connection of the
calibration gas to the gas sampling valve.
7.2.1.4 Thermocouple Readout Device.
Potentiometer or digital thermometer, to
measure source temperature and probe tem-
perature.
7.2.1.5 Heated Gas Sampling Valve. Of
two-position, six-port design, to allow
sample loop to be purged with source gas or
to direct source gas into the OC Instrument.
7.2.1.6 Needle Valve. To control gas sam-
pling rate from the source.
-------
Section No. 3.16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 8
o
7.2.1.7 Pump. Leakless Teflon-coated dia-
phragm-type pump or equivalent, capable of
at least 1 liter/minute sampling rate.
7.2.1.0 Flowmeter. Of suitable ranee to
measure sampling rate.
7.2.1.0 Charcoal Adsorber. To adsorb or-
ganic vapor collected from the source to
prevent exposure of personnel to source gas.
7.2.1.10 Gas Cylinders. Carrier gas
(helium or nitrogen), and oxygen and hy-
drogen for a flame lonization detector (FID)
If one la used.
7.2.1.11 Oas Chromatograph. Capable of
being moved into the field, with detector.
heated eta sampling valve, column required
to complete separation of desired compo-
nents, and option for temperature program-
ming.
7.2.1.12 Recorder/Integrator. To record
results.
7.2.2 Procedure. To obtain a sample, as-
semble the sampling system as shown in
Figure 18-12. Make sure all connections are
tight. Turn on the probe and sample line
heaters. As the temperature of the probe
and heated line approaches the source tem-
perature as Indicated on the thermocouple
readout device, control the heating to main-
tain a temperature of 0 to 3'C above the
eource temperature. While the probe and
heated line are being heated, disconnect the
sample line from the gas sampling valve,
and attach the line from the calibration gas
mixture. Flush the sample loop with cali-
bration gas and analyze a portion of that
tnsa. Record the results. After the calibra-
tion gas sample has been Hushed into the
OC Instrument, turn the gas sampling valve
to flush position, then reconnect the probe
sample line to the valve. Place the inlet of
the probe at the centroid of the duct, or at a
point no closer to the walls than 1 m, and
draw source gas into the probe, heated line,
and sample loop. After thorough flushing,
analyze the sample using the same condi-
tions as for the calibration gas mixture.
Repeat the analysis on an additional
sample. Measure the peak areas for the two
samples, and If they do not agree to within 8
percent of their mean value, analyze addi-
tional samples until two consecutive analy-
ses meet this criteria. Record the data.
After consistent results are obtained,
remove the probe from the source and ana-
lyze a second calibration gas mixture.
Record this calibration data and the other
required data on the data sheet shown in
Figure 18-11. deleting the dilution gas infor-
mation.
(Non: Take care to draw all samples, cali-
bration mixtures, and audits through the
sample loop at the same pressure.)
7.2.3 Determination of Stack Gas Mois-
ture Content. Use Method 4 to measure the
stack gas moisture content.
7.2.4 Quality Assurance. Same as Section
7.1.7. Introduce the audit gases in the
sample line immediately following the
probe.
7.2.5 Emission Calculations. Same as Sec-
tion 7.1.8.
7.3 Dilution Interface Sampling and
Analysis Procedure. Source samples that
contain a high concentration of organic ma-
terials may require dilution prior to analysis
to prevent saturating the OC detector. The
apparatus required for this direct interface
procedure is basically the same as that de-
scribed In the Section 7.2, except a dilution
system is added between the heated sample
line and the gas sampling valve. The appa-
ratus is arranged so that either a 10:1 or
100:1 dilution of the source gu can be di-
rected to the Chromatograph. A pump of
larger capacity is also required, and this
pump must be heated and placed in the
system between the sample line and the di-
lution apparatus:
7.3.1 Apparatus. The equipment required
in addition to that specified for the direct
Interface system is as follows:
7.3.1.1 Sample Pump. Leakless Tenon-
coated diaphragm-type that can withstand
being heated to 120'C and deliver 1.5 liters/
minute.
7.3.1.2 Dilution Pumps. Two Model A-160
Komhyr Teflon positive displacement type
delivering ISO cc/mlnute. or equivalent. As
an option, calibrated flowmeters can be used
In conjunction with Teflon-coated dia-
phragm pumps.
7.3.1.3 Valves. Two Teflon three-way
valves, suitable for connecting to 6.4-mm
OD Teflon tubing.
7.3.1.4 Flowmeters. Two. for measure-
ment of diluent gas, expected delivery flow
rate to be 1.3SO cc/min.
7.3.1.5 Diluent Oas with Cylinders and
Regulators. Oas can be nitrogen or clean
dry air, depending on the nature of the
source gases.
7.3.1.0 Heated Dox. Suitable for being
heated to 120'C. to contain the three
pumps, three-way valves, and associated
connections. The box should be equipped
with quick connect fittings to facUitate con-
nection of: (1) The heated sample line from
the probe, (2) the gas sampling valve. (3)
the calibration gas mixtures, and (4) diluent
gas lines. A schematic diagram of the com-
ponents and connections is shown in Figure
18-13.
(NOTE Care must be taken to leak check
the system prior to the dilutions so as not to
create a potentially explosive atmosphere.)
The heated box shown in Figure 10-13 la
designed to receive a heated line from the
probe. An optional design is to build a probe
unit that attaches directly to the heated
box. In this way, the heated box contains
the controls for the probe heaters, or. If the
box is placed against the duct being sam-
pled, it may be possible to eliminate the
probe heaters. In either case, a heated
Teflon line Is used to connect the heated
box to the gas sampling valve on the chro-
ma tograph.
O
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 9
7.3.2 Procedure. Assemble the apparatus
by connecting the heated box, shown in
Figure 18-13. between the heated sample
line from the probe and the gas sampling
valve on the chromatosraph. Vent the
source gas from the ges sampling valve dl-
rectly to the charcoal filter, eliminating the
pump and rot&meter. Heat the sample
probe, sample line, and heated box. Insert
the probe and source thermocouple to the
centrold of the duct, or to a point no closer
to the walla than 1 m. Measure the source
temperature, and adjust all beating units to
a temperature 0 to 3'C above this tempera-
ture. It this temperature is above the safe
operating temperature of the Teflon compo-
nents, adjust the heating to maintain a tem-
perature high enough to prevent condensa-
tion of water and organic compounds.
Verify the operation of the dilution system
by analyzing a high concentration gas of
known composition through either the 10:1
or 100:1 dilution stages, as appropriate. (If
necessary, vary the flow of the diluent gas
to obtain other dilution ratios.) Determine
the concentration of the diluted calibration
gxs using the dilution factor and the cali-
bration curves prepared In the laboratory.
Record the pertinent data on the data sheet
shown in Figure 18-11. If the data on the di-
luted calibration era are not within 10 per-
cent of the expected values, determine
whether the chromatosreph or the dilution
system la in error, and correct it. Verify the
GC operation using a low concentration
standard by diverting the gas into the
isjnple loop, bypaeting the dilution Byctem.
If thesa analyzes are not within acceptable
limits, correct the dilution system to provide
the desired dilution factors. Make this cor-
rection by diluting a high-concentration
standard gas mixture to adjust the dilution
ratio as required.
Once the dilution system and QC oper-
ations are satisfactory, proceed with the
analysis of source gas. maintaining yje gaxat
dilution tattlnga as used for the standards.
Repeat the analyses until two consecutive
values do not vary by more than S percent
from their mean value are obtained.
Repeat the analysis of the calibration gat
mixtures to verify equipment operation.
Analyze the two field audit samples using
either the dilution system, or directly con-
nect to the gas campling valve as required.
Record all data and report the results to the
audit supervisor.
7.3.3 Determination of stack Gas Mois-
ture Content. Same ta Section 7.2.3.
7.3.4 Quality Assurance. Same as Section
7.2.4.
7.3.5 Emission Calculations. Same as Sec-
tion 7.2.5, with the dilution factor applied.
7.4 Adsorption Tube Procedure (Alterna-
tive Procedure). It is suggested that the
tester refer to the National Institute of Oc-
cupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
method for the particular organica to be
sampled. The principal interferent will be
water vapor. If water vapor is present at
concentrations above 3 percent, silica gel
should be used In front of the charcoal.
Where more than one compound is present
in the emissions, then develop relative ad-
sorptive capacity information.
7.4.1 Additional Apparatus. In addition
to the equipment listed in the NIOSH
method for the particular orcanicKs) to bo
sampled, the following items (or equivalent)
are suggested.
7.4.1.1 Probe (Optional). BoroslUcate
glass or stainless steel, approximately 6-mm
ID, with a heating system if water conden-
sation is a problem, and a filter (either in-
stack or out-stack heated to stack tempera-
ture) to remove particulate matter. In most
instances, a plug of glass wool is a eatisfac-
tory filter.
7.4.1.2 Flexible Tubing. To connect probe
to adsorption tubes. Ues a material that ex-
hibits *T»<"i™*i sample adsorption.
7.4.1.3 Leakiest Sample Pump. Flow con-
trolled. constant1 rate pump, with a eet of
limiting (sonic) orifices to provide pumping
rates from approximately 10 to 100 cc/mln.
7.4.1.4 Bubble-Tube Flowmeter. Volume
accuracy within ± 1 percent, to calibrate
pump.
7.4.1.5 Stopwatch. To time »«pip""g and
pump rate calibration.
7.4.1.6 Adsorption Tubes. Similar to ones
specified by NIOSH. except the amounts of
adsorbent per primary/backup sections ore
eoo/aoo mg for charcoal tubas and KHO/2JO
ms for dlica eel tubes. As an alternative.
the tubes may contain a porous polymer ad-
sorbent such &a Tenax GC or XAD-2.
7.4.1.7 Barometer. Accurate to 5 mm Eg,
to measure atmospheric pressure during
sampling end pump calibration.
7.4.1.8 Rotemeter. 0 to 100 cc/mln, to
detect changes In flow rate during sampling.
7.4.2 Sampling and Analyria. It is sug-
gested that the tester follow the sampling
and analysis portion of the respective
NIOSH method section entitled "Proce-
dure." Calibrate the pump and limiting ori-
fice flow rate through adsorption tubes with
the bubble tube flowmeter before campling.
The sample system can be operated es a "re-
drculatiaff loop" for this operation. Record
the ambient temperature and barometric
pressure. Then, during sampling, use the ro-
tameter to verify that the pump and orifice
sampling rate remains constant.
Use a sample probe, if required, to obtain
the sample at the centroid of the duct, or at
a point no closer to the walls than 1 m. Min-
imize the length of flexible tubing between
the probe and adsorption tubes. Several ad-
sorption tubes can be connected in series, if
the extra adsorptive capacity is needed. Pro-
vide the gas sample to the sample system at
a pressure sufficient for the limiting orifice
to function as a sonic orifice. Record the
total time and sample flow rate (or the
number of pump strokes), the barometric
pressure, and ambient temperature. Obtain
a total sample volume commensurate with
the expected concentration^) of the volatile
organlc(s) present, and recommended
sample loading factors (weight sample per
weight adsorption media). Laboratory tests
prior to actual sampling may be necessary
to predetermine this volume. When more
than one organic is present In the emissions,
then develop relative adsorptive capacity in-
formation. If water vapor is present in the
sample at concentrations above 2 to 3 per-
cent, the adsorptive capacity may be severe-
-------
Section No. 3.16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 10
o
ly reduced. Operate the gas chromatograph
according to the manufacture's Instructions.
Alter establishing optimum conditions,
verify and document these conditions
during all operations. Analyze the audit
samples (see Section 7.4.4.3), then the emis-
sion samples. Repeat the analyst* of each
sample until the relative deviation of two
consecutive Injections does not exceed 5 per-
cent.
7.4.3 Standards and Calibration. The
standards can be prepared according to the
respective NIOSH method. Use a minimum
of three different standards; select the con-
centrations to bracket the expected average
sample concentration. Perform the calibra-
tion before and after each day's sample
analyses. Prepare the calibration curve by
using the least squares method.
7.4.4 Quality Assurance.
7.4.4.1 Determination of Desorptlon Effi-
ciency. During the testing program, deter-
mine the desorptlon efficiency In the ex-
pected sample concentration range for each
batch of adsorption media to be used. Use
an Internal standard. A minimum desorp-
tlon efficiency of 50 percent shall be ob-
tained. Repeat the desorptlon determina-
tion until the relative deviation of two con-
secutive determinations does not exceed 5
percent. Use the average desorption effi-
ciency of these two consecutive determina-
tions for the correction specified In Section
7.4.4.S. If the desorptlon efficiency of the
compound(s) of Interest Is questionable
under actual sampling conditions, use of the
Method of Standard Additions may be help-
ful to determine this value.
7.4.4.2 Determination of Sample Collec-
tion Efficiency. For the source samples, ana-
lyze the primary and backup portions of the
adsorption tubes separately. If the backup
portion exceeds 10 percent of the total.
amount (primary and backup), repeat the
sampling with a larger sampling portion.
7.4.4.3 Analysis Audit. Immediately
before the sample analyses, analyze the two
audits In accordance with Section 7.4.2. The
analysis audit shall agree with the audit
concentration within 10 percent.
7.4.4.4 Pump Leak Checks and Volume
Flow Rate Checks. Perform both of these
checks immediately after sampling with all
sampling train components in place. Per-
form all leak checks according to the manu-
facturer's Instructions, and record the re-
sults. Use the bubble-tube flowmeter to
measure the pump volume now rate with
the orifice used in the test sampling, and
the result. If It has changed by more than 5
but less than 20 percent, calculate an aver-
age flow rate for the test. If the flow rate
has changed by more than 20 percent, reca-
librate the pump and repeat the sampling.
7.4.4.5 Calculations. All calculations can
be performed according to the respective
NIOSH method. Correct all sample volumes
to standard conditions. If a sample dilution
system has been used, multiply the results
by the appropriate dilution ratio. Correct all
results by dividing by the desorptlon effi-
ciency (decimal value). Report results as
ppm by volume, dry basis.
7.5 Reporting of Results. At the comple-
tion of the field analysis portion of the
study, ensure that the data sheets shown In
Figure 18-11 have been completed. Summa-
rize this data on the data sheets shown In
•Figure 18-15.
8. Bibliopraphv
1, American Society for Testing and Mate-
rials. Ci Through C. Hydrocarbons in the
Atmosphere by Gas Chromatography.
ASTM D 2820-72. Part 23. Philadelphia, Pa.
23:950-988.1673.
2. Corazon, V. V. Methodology for Collect-
Ing and Analyzing Organic Air Pollutants.
UJ3. Environmental Protection Agency.
Publication No. EPA-600/2-79-042. Febru-
ary 1979.
3. Dravnieks, A.. B. K. Krotoszynskl. J.
Whltfleld, A. O'Donnell, and T. Burgwald.
Environmental Science and Technology.
SU2):1200-1222.1971.
4. Eggertsen. F. T., and F. M. Nelsen. Oaa
Chromatographic Analysis of Engine Ex-
haust and Atmosphere. Analytical Chemis-
try. J
-------
Section No. 3.16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 11
19. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods.
Volumes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services National In-
stitute for Occupational Safety and Health.
Center for Disease Control. 4676 Columbia
Parkway, Cincinnati. Ohio 45226. April
1977-August 1981. May be available from
the Superintendent of Documents. Govern-
ment Printing Office, Washington, DC
20402. Stock Number/Price: Volume 1—017-
033-00267-3/$13. Volume 2—017-033-00260-
6/411. Volume 3-017-033-00261-4/$l4,
Volume 4—017-033-00317-3/S7.25, Volume
5—017-033-00349-1/$10, Volume 6—017-033-
00360-6/J9, and Volume 7—017-033-00386-
5/$7. Prices subject to change. Foreign
orders add 25 percent.
20. Schuetzle. D.. T. J. Prater, and S. R.
Ruddell. Sampling and Analysis of Emis-
sions from Stationary Sources; I. Odor and
Total Hydrocarbons. Journal of the Air Pol-
lution Control Association. 25(9):925-932.
1975.
21. Snyder, A. D., P. N. Hodgson. M. A.
Kemmer and J. R. McKendree. Utility of
Solid Sorbents for Sampling Organic Emis-
sions from Stationary Sources. U.S. Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency. Research Tri-
angle Park. NC Publication No. EPA 600/2-
76-201. July 1976. 71 p.
22. Tentative Method for Continuous
Analysis of Total Hydrocarbons in the At-
mosphere. Intersociety Committee, Ameri-
can Public Health Association. Washington,
DC 1972. p. 184-186.
23. Zwerg, G., CRC Handbook of Chroma-
tography. Volumes I and II. Sherma. Joseph
(ed.). CRC Press. Cleveland. 1972.
-------
cf
Ccntscts
Process to be
Duct CP vsnt to ba i6=pled_
II. Process description
Rsw oatertal
Products
Cats
Pnsns
Operating cycla
Cheek: Bitch Continuous
fining of batch or cyclo
Cist tics to test
.Cyclic
Figure 18-1. Prsllninary survey data sheet.
Cespenanta to bo analysed gxpaetod eoneantration
Suggoatad chxoaatogxaphie
Coltm flew rato nl/nin Hoad prosoora t
Colum toaparatnroi
laothamal *C
Progra==3d fren *C to _ 'C at _
Injaction port/aaopla loop terrporaturo _ ^*C
Datactor temperature *C
Datactor flow rataai Hydrogen _____nl/nin.
haad praaauro
Air/Osygen nl/aia,
hoad pr a a aura
Chart apaed _________ inchea/ninuta
Cerpoond datat
Conpound Ratantien tlna Attanuatien
39
Hg
rsa Hg
TJ o C/)
£3 p CD
oq rf o
CD CD ct
O
P
fu
7igara 10-2. Chrcaatographic eonditiono data ohaat.
0) 2!
O
CO •
o
- OJ
CX>-
OO l
O
o
o
-------
Preparation of Standards In Tedlar Bags
and Calibration Curve
Standards
Mixture" Mixture Mixture
Standards Preparation Data: II »2 13
Organic:
Bag timber or identification
Dry gas ester calibration factor
Final neter reading (liters)
Initial eater reading (liters)
Hetered voluse (liters)
Average eeter teaperature (*K)
Average ester pressure, gauge (rai Hg)
Average ataospherlc pressure (ea Hg)
Average ester pressure, absolute (ea Hg)
Syringe temperature (*X)
(Section 6.2.2.1)
Syringe pressure, absolute (ea Hg)
(Section 6.2.2.1)
YoTuae of gas In syringe (nl)
(Section 6.2.2.1)
Density of liquid organic (g/nl)
(Section 6.2.2.2)
Voluae of liquid In syringe ({!)
(Section 6.2.2.2)
GC Operating Conditions:
Stsple loop voline (•!)
Saaple loop tesperature (*C)
Carrier gas flow rate (tri/nln)
Coluan tcsperature
Initial CO
Rate change PC/Bin)
Final CCJ
Organic Peak Identification and
Calculated'Concentrations:
Injection ties (24-hr clock)
Distance to paak (ca)
Chart speed (ca/nln)
Organic retention tiee (nln)
Attenuation factor
Peak height (n)
Peak area («2)
Peak area x attenuation factor
Calculated concentration (ppa)
(Equation 18-3 or 18-4)
Plot peak area x attenuation factor against calculated concentration
to obtain calibration curve.
rtgure 18-3. Standards prepared In Tedlar bags
and calibration curve.
Flcvatter Calibration
Flcwseter nusber or Identification
Flowsteter type
Calibration device (x):Bubble raeter
Readings at laboratory conditions:
Laboratory tesperature (Ti4(,)
Spl roaster
Laboratory baresttrie pressure (Pi*b'
Flow data:
Flowseter
Wet testracier
Hg
Calibration device
reading ~| tesp.
(as narked) I (*X)
i pressure
l(absolute)
Titse I I ~
(nln) Igas voltaa* jflow rate"
T I
I I
a » Voluae of gas neasured by calibration device, corrected to standard
conditions (liters).
b * Calibration device gas volcee/tln*.
Plot f! wester reading against flow rate (standard conditions), and draw a
seooth curve. If tns fletflMter being calibrated 1s • rottatter or otter
How device that Is viscosity dspenitnt, It wy be necessary to $tfier«tt a
•feally' of calibration curves that cover the operating pressure end
tcs?eraturt ranges of th» floustter.
tla following technique should be verified before application. It nay
bt possible to calculate flow rat* readings for rotczcters at standard
conditions Qjtd ts follows:
T1ab\ »«
b\
V
Flew rata
(lefearatcry cenditions)
Ret* rat«
(standard conditions)
Figure 18-4. Flotewtw calibration.
TJ a to
CD Co (D
oq ci- o
to a> ct-
H-
I-1 «-4 o
UJ C O
ro s:
o
uo •
o
VD a\
<»•
00 H'
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 14
o
CAS
CYUHMIl
DILUENT
CAS
cnnron?
h«^
\
CALlDRATTDROTAf.'ITinS
nim ROB CONTROL
VAIVES
Flpjr» 1S-5.
calfbritfra
o
men
co:;cniTnATio:i
DASTE
mm—
3—f,lEtJl£ VALVES
J
PRESSURE
ion
om
GAS
DIUmiTAIR
DIUKHTAin
PURESUGSTAtlCEOn
MIXTURE
Figure 10-6. Tttostigs dllu.tlon epparatus.
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 15
Preparation of Standards by Dilution of Cylinder Standard
Cylinder standard: Organic Certified concentration
Standards Preparation Data: Date
ppa
Stage 1 Mixture 1 Mixture 2 Mixture 3
Standard gas flewmeter reading
Diluent gas flowaeter reading . _____
Laboratory teaperature CK)
Baresstrlc pressure (o Hg)
Flotottter gage pressure (IBS Hg)
Flow rate cylinder gas at
standard conditions (al/nln)
Flow rate diluent gas at
standard conditions (nl/raln)
Calculated concentration (ppa)
Stage 2 (If used)
Standard gas flowaeter reading
Diluent gas flowaater reading
Flow rate stage 1 gas at
standard conditions (al/nln)
Flow rate diluent gas at
standard conditions (ml/Bin)
Calculated concentration (ppn)
GC Operating Conditions:
Sample loop voluae (nl)
Saaple loop temperature CO
Carrier gas flow rate (nl/otn)
Column tenperature:
Initial CO
Prograa rate CC/nln) "~~~~
••: F1nal (
-------
Section No. 3-16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 16
COILING
WATER
OATH
SYRINGE
SEPTUM
4- MIDGET
IMPIKGER
HOTPLATE
NITROGEN
CniNDER
o
Figure 18-0. Apparatus for preparation cf liquid eatcrlali.
VZtJT
TIRO?!
STACK
HAU.
FRTIR fl
C31ASS HJOll 11
nrvinst
O-JIYPE
PITOTTUEE
RIGID UAKRJ007 (XWTAI
O
Figure 10-9. Integrated bag strpHng train.
-------
PrcSa
8* Tefla
WstftClta?
Section No. 3.16.1C
Date June 30, 1988
Page 17
Mr Tlfht Steal Crta „
«
p* oHtpa j
/--..
*:
:
' 0 1
\ ' :
« . •
% :
i
/
«._v
Hf&x
EtatgateJ Steal
Crca
18-9*. Exploslca risk CM (telling esthsd.
P1«J»t_
S1ta_
Oats
Simple g
Source tcrpsraturo (*C)
Testtrrotca Hg)_
tc=?«ratara (*C)
Sample flcy rate(eppr.)
Dag mnbsr
Start tlcz
Finish tlsa
Figure 18*10. Field staple data sheet - Tedlar
bag collection catted.
-------
Section No. 3.16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 18
o
Plant..
Location
Caneral 4nfornaU.cn
Source t*Ep*raturo (*C)
Probe tarperatture CO
AsMent tezporature (*C)
Atsoiphtrie praaaure (ea)
Coturce preaaero (*Cg)
Absolute eooreft prtaaura p««4 tea/nin)
Dilation gas flow rate (al/ein)
Dilution Ca« nsad (tyebol)
Dilution ratio
O
HCJTV 16-11. mid tnalyslt data stem.
a. ?ield «aalynia Data - Calibration Cue
Can ea. Tiia
Area Attenuation A x A Factor Cene.
torn Co. tlea
Area Attanaatien A »e A Taeter Cone, (ppn)
Ban Bo. tlea
Cenponanta Area Atttnuatien A « A Factor Cene. (ppn>
O
Flpirt 1>-11 (tcntlr.uad). Flald analysis dau th«tu.
-------
Section No. 3-16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 19
TC
aietai
- II
re Ktton
OS
DiKSCUCt
1
hlRCSSCS
18»J2. Direct Interfeca
tystcn.
Vent to Charcoal Adsorbers
Heated Line
Frosa Probe
' »*c
Quick
Connect
i
x \
-fr
t3
Source
Gas Pirrp
, i
iyj
cc/MIr
— (
1.5 L/M1n "
i
10:1
100:1
^^S
rW
£1
)
_f
3-Hay Valves
In 100:1
Position '
V -**
Quick Connects
To Gas SeKple
Valve
r— f-) 150 cc/MIn
)
Check Valve I
i Quick Connects I
> For Calibration L
i
H cssaters
(On Outside
Of eor.)
Row Rate Of
1350 cc/Ntn
Heated Box at 1ZO°C Or Source Temperature
Figure 18-13. Schematic dlagraa of the heated box required
for dilution of sarple gas.
-------
Section No. 3.16.10/*—\
Date June 30, 1988 ( )
Page 20 V-X
QACTOU* Oioinc BAxrwra jure AHALTIU
GnrsLirT
floWOV AoUTM flOCfM
Olcswod with Initial* or number u
•pproprUte) ' *~ <
LO*a*nl
Coorot
tsaotntttn
L rronrm dtu:
B. Onb aaete utlTMd" <"c>-
" ' ~ ——— uoscnton
CO
Ateiotpbcrte
t t^aontorT rmKtrmrton data: Coaret
X OtUbntiao curm pr»-
puvd—_^ O _
Number of eompo- (mlAami
tuntg, O ~
CimpUloop
conpootot (1 rv- U8p
B. Aattt »«iTjil«i (opttoo- Csmpl*
Amlnl> eonplM- UaM(M-lsr
Cotasn
t49ffiC
tare
O
«. ete»U>» preewtanK rCX.
XIKttMMt Precna
BM*UI«I*____ a a rsurc/
a o
CdstJaa tnUrtJ6t_ Q O FtnttlCC}..
B. ItmalMr of HB9>« eat- O»m«rf«a
tn flovnl*
4. rwkl u^trttz Unl/BtoX
X TBttl bjdi'oeiiton DtUctar
KambCT of ersrapo-
1S*14. fifnpllny tnd uulysli
Ftrformod by Ulm»lnr«l-
auxou* Otcunc Rtvnna uro Axu.Tti* __
DATA DU« -
flow rmtc
pUnt
pm PUure 18-14. o«Bipaaj «ad (nairtli sheet.
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 21
APPENDIX C—QUALITY ASSURANCE
PROCEDURES*
Procedure 1—Determination of Adequate
ChromatosrrapMc Peak Resolution
In this method of dealing with resolution.
the extent to which one chromatographic
peak overlaps another la determined.
For convenience, consider the ranee of the
elution curve of each compound as running
from -2
-------
Section No. 3.16.10
Date June 30, 1988
Page 22
o
C *fc_«_ k_
b-JOj b-to, b*2of
-07 -07-
Th* following calculation ttept art r*qu1red:*
1. 2o$ « t./^ In 2
2. oe • t£
3. x, « (b
4. x,
S. fl(x,)»-i
P-x*\
"*" /dx
8. A0 « IflAe/A,
9. Pircentag* overlap « Afl x 100 ,
A •
AC «
tc «
C(xi) *
Q(*«) *
Ifl «
Ar«a of th* i«tplt p«tk of Inttrtft daUralntd by tltctronlc inte-
gration or by th* forcula A( » h t..
Arta of th* contnlnant ptik, daunltttd In th* tax aanntr at A(.
Olitane* on th* chrcutographfc chart that ttparatat the uxlu of
thj two p«aki.
Pttk h*1eht of th* ttspU coxpound of 1nt*r*>t, M*tur*d froa th*
«v«r«j» vilu* of th* paialtn* to th» BUtnui of th* curv*.
Width of ««cpU p*ak of InUrcit at 1/2 p*ak h**xJ«r preesur*. p«_
ij/bdux
D.ppm.
lOKCone.
It^l (JUflC.
o
Part S.—To be filled out by audit mpetvl-
sor. - . .
I. Process sampled
2. Audit location-
3. Name of individual audlt-
4. Audit date
5. Audit results:
b. Cy£ndv pnMturt before audit, pet
c. Cy&ndor pf*»eur* after eurfit p*^
fl* fc^ecton tC2* Avere^e
*. Actual audK eonoerrtratioa Ppm (Part A,
«•}...
f. Aucflecctncy:1
ImrCmw. Cyimtif
Hijfi Cwc, CV"^1**
Percent' aceureey -
Ueejind Conc-Actut* Cone.
AdudConc.
Q pfi^r"!
-------
Section No. 3.16.11
Date June 30, 1988
Page 1
11.0 REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
Method 18 - Measurement of Gaseous Organic Compound - Emissions by Gas
Chromatography. Federal Register, Volume 48, No. 202, October 18, 1983 ,
page
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Amendments to Method 18. Federal Register, Volume 49, No. 105, May 30,
1984, page 22608.
Miscellaneous Clarifications and Addition of Concentration Equations to
Method 18. Federal Register. Volume 52, No. 33, February 19, 198?, page
5105.
Stability of Parts-Per-Million Organic Cylinder Gases and Results of
Source Test Analysis Audits, Status Report #8. U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency Publication No. EPA-600/2-86-117, January 198?. Also
available from NTIS as Publication No. PB 8y-l4l46l.
Traceability Protocol for Establishing True Concentration of Gases Used
for Calibration and Audits of Continuous Source Emission Monitors
(Protocol No. 1). Section 3-0.4, Quality Assurance Handbook, Volume
III, Stationary Source Specific Methods, U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency Publication No. EPA-600/4-?7-027b, June 15, 1978.
Methanol, Method 2000. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Volume 2,
Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, February
1984.
Alcohols I, Method 1400. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Volume 1,
Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, February
1984.
Alcohols II, Method 1401. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Volume 1,
Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, February
1984.
Hydrocarbons. BP 36 - 126° C, Method 1500. NIOSH Manual of Analytical
Methods, Volume 2, Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human
Services , February 1984 .
Development of Methods for Sampling 1,3-Butadiene. Interim Report
prepared under U. S. "Environmental Protection Agency Contract Number
68-02-3993, March 1987-
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene, Method 2518. NIOSH Manual of Analytical
Methods, Volume 2, Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human
Services, February 1984.
Method 110 - Determination of Benzene from Stationary Sources, Proposed
Rule. Federal Register. Volume 45, No. 77, April 18, 1980, page 26677.
-------
Section No. 3.16.11
Date June 30, 1988 >«.
Page 2 f j
13. Hydrocarbons, Aromatic, Method 1501. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods,
Volume 2, Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services,
February 1984.
14. Naphthylamines, MetftG>a£li264. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Volume
4, Second Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, August
1978.
15. Ketones I, Method 1300. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Volume 2,
Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, February
1984.
16. 2-Butanone, Method 2500. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Volume 1,
Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, February
17- Ethylene Oxide, Method 1607. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Volume
1, Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, February
1984.
18. Propylene Oxide, Method 1612. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. Volume
2, Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, February
1984.
19. Hydrocarbons, Halogenated, Method 1003. NIOSH Manual of Analytical
Methods, Volume 2, Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human
Services, February 1984.
20. Ethylene Dibromide, Method 1008. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods,
Volume 1, Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services,
February 1984.
21. Method 23 - Determination of Halogenated Organics from Stationary Sources
(proposed method). Federal Register. Volume 45. No. 114, June 11, 1980,
page 39766.
22. . 1,2-Dichloropropane, Method 1013. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods,
Volume 1, Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services,
February 1984.
23. Development of Methods for Sampling Chloroforn and Carbon Tetrachloride.
Interim Report prepared for U. S.. Environmental Protection Agency under
EPA Contract Number 68-02-3993, November 1986.
24. Dichlorodifluoromethane, Method 111. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods,
Volume 2, Second Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services,
April 1977.
O
O
-------
Section No. 3.16.11
Date June 30, 1988
Page 3
25. Methyl Bromide, Method 2520. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Volume
2, Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, February
1984.
26. Methyl Chloride, Method 99. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Volume
4, Second Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, August
1978.
27. Butler, F. E., E. A. Coppedge, J. C. Suggs, J. E. Knoll, M. R. Midgett,
A. L. Sykes, M. W. Hartiaan, and J. L. Steger. Development of a Method
for Determination of Methylene Chloride Emissions at Stationary Sources.
Paper for presentation at 80th Annual Meeting of Air Pollution Control
Association, New York, NY, June 1987.
28. Vinylidene Chloride, Method 266. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods,
Volume 4, Second Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services,
August 1978.
29. Ethyl Chloride, Method 2519. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Volume
1, Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, February
1984.
30. Method 106 - Determination of Vinyl Chloride from Stationary Sources.
Federal Register, Volume 47, No. 173, September 7, 1982, page 39168.
31. Knoll, J. E., M. A. Smith, and M. R. Midgett. Evaluation of Emission
Test Methods for Halogenated Hydrocarbons, Volume II, U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency Publication No. EPA-600/4- 80-003, January 19&0.
32. Methylene Chloride, Method 1005. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods,
Volume 2, Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services,
February 1984.
33. Tetrachloroethylene, Method 335. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods,
Volume 3» Second Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services,
April 1977-
34. Trichloroethylene, Method 336. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods,
Volume 3t Second Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services,
April 1977.
35. -1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane. Method 129. NIOSH Manual of Analytical
Methods, Volume 2, Second Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human
Services, April 1977- .
36. Vinyl Chloride, Method 1007. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Volume
2, Third Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, February
1984.
37- Mann, J. B., J. J. Freal, H. F. Enos, and J. X. Danauskas. Development
and Application of Methodology for Determining 1,2 Dibromo-3-
Chloropropane (DBCP) in Ambient Air. Journal of Environmental Science
and Health, B15(5), 519-528 (1980).
-------
Section No. 3.16.1
Date June 30. 1988
Page 4
38. VOC Sampling and Analysis Workshop, Volume III. U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency Publication No. EPA-340/1-84-001C, September 1984.
39. Knoll, J. E., M. A. Smith, and M. R. Midgett. Evaluation of Emission Test
Methods for Halogenated Hydrocarbons, Volume I. U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency Publication No. EPA-600/4-79~025, March 1979.
40. Binetti, R. et al. Headspace Gas Chromatographic Detection of Ethylene
Oxide in Air. Chromatographia, Vol. 21, December 1986.
111. Butadiene, Method 591. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Volume 2,
Second Edition, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, April 1977.
42. Knoll, J. E. Estimation of the Limit of Detection in Chromatography.
Journal of Chromatographic Science, Vol. 23, September 1985.
43. Procedure 1 - Determination of Adequate Chromatographic Peak Resolution.
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40. Part 6l. Appendix C, July 1, 1987-
44. Method 625 - Base/Neutrals and Acids. Code of Federal Regulations, Title
40. Part 136. Appendix A, July 1, 1987.
45. C. through C_ Hydrocarbons in the Atmosphere by Gas Chromatography. ASTM I/ J
2820-72, Part 23. American Society for Testing and Materials, ^—/
Philadelphia, PA, 23:950-958, 1973.
46. Corazon, V. V. Methodology for Collecting and Analyzing Organic Air
Pollutants. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Publication No.
EPA-600/2-79-042, February 1979.
47. Dravnieks, A., B. K. Krotoszynski, J. Whitfield, A. O'Donnell, and T.
Burgwald. Environmental Science and Technology, 5(12):1200-1222, 1971.
48. Eggertsen, F. T., and F. M. Nelson. Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Engine
Exhaust and Atmosphere. Analytical Chemistry, 30(6): 1040-1043, 1958.
49. Feairheller, W. R., P. J. Marn, D. H. Harris, and D. L. Harris. Te<3inical
Manual for Process Sampling Strategies for Organic Materials, U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Publication No. EPA 600/2-76-122. April
1976.
50. FR, 39 FR 9319-9323, 1974.
51. FR. 39 FR 32857-32860. 1974.
52. FR, 41 FR 23069-23072 and 23076-23090, 1976.
53. FR, 41 FR 46569-46571, 1976.
54. FR, 42 FR 41771-41776, 1977.
-------
Section No. 3.16.11
Date June 30, 1988
Page 5
55. Fishbein, L. Chromatography of Environmental Hazards, Volume II. Elsevier
Scientific Publishing Company, New York, New York, 1973-
56. Hamersma, J. W., S. L. Reynolds, and R. F. Maddalone. EPA/IERL Procedures
Manual: Level 1 Environmental Assessment, U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency Publication No. EPA 600/276/l60a, June 1976.
57. Harris, J. C., M. J. Hayes, P. L. Levins, and D. B. Lindsay. EPA/IERL
Procedures for Level 2 Sampling and Analysis of Organic Materials. U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency Publication No. EPA 600/7-79-033, February
1979-
58. Harris, W. E., H. W. Habgood. Programmed Temperature Gas Chromatography.
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, 1966.
59• Methods of Air Sampling and Analysis. Intersociety Committee, American
Health Association, Washington, D. C., 1972.
60. Jones, P. W., R. D. Grammer, P. E. Strup, and T. B. Stanford.
Environmental Science and Technology, 10:806-810, 1976.
61. McNair Han Bunelli, E. J. Basic Gas Chromatography. Consolidated Printers,
Berkeley, 1969.
62. Nelson, G. 0. Controlled Test Atmospheres, Principles and Techniques. Ann
Arbor, Ann Arbor Science Publishers, 1971.
63. Schuetzle, D., T. J. Prater, and S. R. Ruddell. Sampling and Analysis of
Emissions from Stationary Sources; I. Odor and Total Hydrocarbons.
Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 1975-
64. Snyder, A. D., F. N. Hodgson, M. A. Kemmer, and J. R. HcKendree. Utility
of Solid Sorbents for Sampling Organic Emissions from Stationary Sources.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Publication No. EPA 600/2-76-201,
July 1976.
65. Tentative Method for Continuous Analysis of Total Hydrocarbons in the
Atmosphere. Intersociety Committee, American Public Health Association,
Washington, D.C., 1972.
66. Zwerg, G. CRC Handbook of Chromatography, Volumes I and II. CRC Press,
Cleveland, 1972.
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.16.12
Date June 30, 1988
Page 1
12.0 DATA FORMS
Blank data forms are provided on the following pages for the convenience of
the Handbook user. Each blank form has the custoaary descriptive title centered at
the top of the page. However, the section-page documentation in the top right-hand
corner of each page has been replaced with a number in the lower right-hand corner
that will enable the user to identify and refer to a similar filled-in fora in a
text section. For example, form M18-2.5 indicates that the form is Figure 2.5 in
Section $.18.2 of the Method 18 section. Future revisions of these forms, if any.
can be documented by 2.5a, 2.5b, etc. Nineteen of the blank forms listed below are
included in this section. Six have been left blank in the text as shown following
the form number.
Form
Title
Flowmeter Calibration Data Form
(English and metric units)
Critical Orifice Calibration Data Form
(English and metric units)
Dynamic Dilution Data Form
Static Dilution Data Form
Thermometer Calibration Forn
Preliminary Survey Data Sheet
Preliminary Survey Preparations
Pretest Sampling Checks
Pretest Preparations
Field Sampling Data Form for Container Sampling
Field Sampling Data Form for Direct Interface Sampling
Field Sampling Data Form for Adsorption Tube Sampling
On-site Measurements Checklist
Data Form for Analysis of Method 18 Samples
Calibration Standard Preparation Data Form for Diluted
Gas Cylinders
Calibration Data Form for Preparation of Standards in
Tedlar Bags by Gas and Liquid Injection
-------
Section No. 3.16.12
Date June 30, 1988
Page 2
o
5.8 Data Form for Development of Response and Relative
Retention Factors
5.9 Data Form for Preparation of Liquid Standards and
Desorption Efficiency Samples for Adsorption Tube Analysis
5.10 (Text) Postsampling Operations Checklist
6.1 Calculation Form for GO Analysis by Gas Injection
6.2 Calculation Form for GC Analysis by Liquid Injection
8.1 Field Audit Report Form
8.2 Method 18 Checklist to be Used by Auditors
O
o
-------
FLOWMETER CALIBRATION DATA FO
glish units)
Date
Calibrated by
Meter system no.
Barometric pressure, Pm =
Type of primary meter: wet test
Type of flowmeter calibrated: rotameter
in. Hg Ambient temperature
Primary meter no.
op
, dry gas
, or bubble meter
, dry gas meter
or mass flowtneter
Primary meter readings
Initial
reading
(vpl),»
ft3
Final
reading
(V),'
ft3
Initial
temp,°F
(tpi)
op
Final
temp,°F
(tpr>
oF
Press
drop
(Dp)<
in.
H20
Flowmeter readings
Initial
reading
-------
FLOWMETER CALIBRATION DATA FORM (metric units)
Date
Calibrated by
Meter systen no.
Primary deter no.
°C
Barometric pressure, Pn * mn Hg Ambient temperature
Type of primary meter: wet test , dry gas , or bubble meter
Type of flowmeter calibrated: rotaineter
, dry gas meter
, or mass flowmeter
Primary meter readings
Initial
reading
(vpi).a
m3
Final
reading
(vpf),a
D3
Initial
temp,°F
('PI*
°C
Final
temp,°F
(tpf)
°C
Pres
drop
(V
mm
^0
Flowmeter readings
Initial
reading
(V,i).b
Ej3 or
ia- /nin
Final
reading
(V"
n3 or
ia3/min
Initial
temp
(t.i)
°C
Final
temp
°C
Press
drop
(Ds).c
mm
H20
Time
min
(9)td
min
Calibration
factors
(Yt).e
(Y)
tt Volume passing through the neter using the initial and final readings and requires a minimum of at
least five revolutions of the meter.
b Volume passing through the meter using the initial and final readings or the indicated flow rate
using the initial and final flow rate setting.
0 Pressure drop through the meter used to calculate the neter pressure.
d The time it takes to complete the calibration run.
e With Y defined as the average ratio of volumes for the primary meter compared to the flowmeter
calibrated, Yj = Y + 0.03Y for the calibration and Yj = Y + 0.05Y for the posttest checks; thus,
For calibration of the dry gas neter:
- Vpiint.i * fc.f)/2 *'273°K][P. * {Dp/13.6)] _ YI
273"K][P.
For calibration of the rotaneter and nass flowaeter:
fc.f)/2 * 273°K][PB
(Eq. 2-6)
(Dp/13.6)]
o
tpf)/2 + 2738K][Pa
{Eq. 2-7), Y -
(Eq. 2-8)
o
Quality Assurance Handbook H18
-O
-------
CRITICAL ORIFICE CALIBRATION DATA FORM (English units)
Date
Calibrated by
Meter system no.
Primary meter no.
op
Barometric pressure, Pa = in. Hg Ambient temperature
Type of primary meter: wet test , dry gas , or bubble meter
Type of critical orifice: capillary glass
needle or tubing
, or adjustable
Primary meter readings
Initial
reading
(Vpi)/
ft3
Final
reading
(vpf),a
ft3
Initial
temp,°F
-------
CRITICAL ORIFICE CALIBRATION DATA FORM (metric units)
Date
Calibrated by
Meter system no.
Barometric pressure, PB =
Type of primary meter: wet test
Type of critical orifice: capillary glass
Primary neter no.
°C
mm Hg Ambient temperature
, dry gas , or bubble meter
needle or tubing
, or adjustable
Primary meter readings
Initial
reading
mm
H20
Critical orifice readings
Initial
setting
b
L or
L/min
Final
setting
b
L or
L/min
Press
drop
c
mm
Hg
Time
rain
(9),"
min
Calculated
flow rate
W(.td)]'
L/min
Calibration
factor'
(K'J
(K')
* Volume passirig through the meter using the initial and final readings and requires a minimum of at
least five revolutions of the meter.
b Volume passing through the orifice using the initial and final readings or the indicated flow rate
using the initial and final flow rate setting (for variable setting orifice only).
c Pressure drop through the meter used to calculate the meter pressure.
d The time it takes to complete the calibration run.
e With K' defined as the average orifice calibration factor based on the volumes of the primary test
meter, K't = K1.^ 0.03K1 for the calibration and K'j * K1 + 0.05K1 for the posttest checks; thus,
Flow rate of the primary meter at standard conditions:
0.3858(Vpf - Vpl)(P0 + Dp/13.6)
td)
tf)/2 * 2?3°C]
(Eq. 2-13), Q(ltd) =
pf
0
(Eq. 2-
For determination of the K1 for the critical orifice:
(Eq. 2-15), &
K'
K'
(Eq. 2-16)
• ba r
e
o
o
Quality Assurance Handbook Ml2-«2.2B
-------
DYNAMIC CALIBRATION DATA FORM
Date
Source flovnaeter number
Stage 1 flowoeter number
Stage 2 flovnaeter number
Barometric press mm (in.) Hg
Organic compound
Calibrated by
Date source meter calibrated _
Date stage 1 meter calibrated
Date stage 2 meter calibrated
Heated box temperature
Leak check for total system
Certified concentration
ppmv(X) Date of calibration curve
STAGE 1
Emission gas flowmeter reading, ml/min (q,.,).
Diluent gas flovnaeter reading, ml/min
Dilution ratio
Injection time, 24h
Distance to peak, cm
Chart speed, cm/min
Retention time, min
Attenuation factor
Peak area or units
Peak area X attenuation factor
Measured concentration,* ppmv
Calculated concentration," ppmv (C, )
Percent difference,6 % ,
RUN 1
RUN 2
STAGE 2 (if applicable)
Emission gas flovnaeter reading, ml/min
Diluent gas flowsaeter reading, ml/min
Dilution ratio
Injection tins, 24h
Distance to peak, cm
Chart speed, cm/min
Retention time, min
Attenuation factor
Peak area or units
Peak area X attenuation factor
Measured concentration,' ppmv
Calculated concentration,4 ppmv
Percent difference,6 %
RUN 1
RUN2
RUN3
v * See Figure 5-1 for calculation.
106 x (X x qc )
c Percent Difference
3 Calculated concentration for single stage
Calculated Concentration- - Measured Concentration
Measured Concentration
x 100J5
C. = 106 x X
= Calculated cone, for two stage
Quality Assurance Handbook M18-2.5
-------
Date
Source flowneter number
Dry gas meter number
Ambient temperature
Barometric press _
Organic compound
Certified concen,
STATIC DILUTION DATA FORM
Calibrated by
o
°C (°F)
mm (in.) Hg
(X)
ppmv
Date source meter calibrated _
Date dry gas meter calibrated
Dry gas meter calib factor (Y)
Leak check for total system _
Vacuum during leak check _ _
Date of calibration curve
Initial dry gas meter reading, L (ft3)
Final dry gas meter reading, L (ft3)
Volume of diluent gas metered, L (ft3)
Gas metered X calibration factor (Y),{V2}
Flowmeter sampling rate, ml/min (cfm)
Sampling time, nin
Sampling rate X sample tine , L ( ft3 ) , { Vt }
Dilution ratio
Injection time, 24h
Distance to peak, en
Chart speed, en/rain
Retention time, nin
Attenuation factor •
Peak area or units
Peak area X attenuation factor
Measured concentration,* ppmv
Calculated concentration,11 pprav, {Cs}
Percent difference,* %
RUN 1
RUN 2
* See Figure 5»i for calculations.
b Calculated concentration (C,) **
V2)
ppmv
c Percent difference, #d
Measured concent - Calculated concent
Measured concentration
X 100
The percent difference must be less than 10 % absolute.
Quality Assurance Handbook H18-2.6
O
-------
THERMOMETER CALIBRATION FORM
Date
Reference
thermometer
type
Calibi
thermc
type
•ated
>meter
use
no.
Ambler
refer*
it temper
calibrb
Meaaurec
*ature
differc
[ values
Bo:
refer*
i
iling wal
calibrb
;er
differc
Calibrator's
initials
Temperature reading of the reference thermometer in °C or °F.
Temperature reading of the thermometer being calibrated in °C or °F.
Difference between the reference thermometer and the calibrated thermometer. This difference must
be less than 3°C (5.4°F) for than initial calibration and 6°C (10.4°F) for the calibration check.
Quality Assurance Handbook M18-2.7
-------
FIELD SAMPLING DATA FORM FOR CONTAINER SAMPLING
Plant
City
Operator
Date
Flowneter calib.(Y)
Container type: bag
Run number
Stack dia, mm (in.)
Sample box number
syringe
canister
Container volume,
Container number
Average ( P)
Initial flowmeter setting
Average stack temp
Dilution system: (dynamic)
emission flowsetting
diluent flowsetting
Dilution system: (static)
liters emission flowsetting
Final leak check
m3/min (cfra)
mm (in.) IljO Vacuum during leak check
Pitot tube (Cp)
Static press mm (in.) HjO Barometric press
°C (°F) Sampling point location
mm (in.) H20
mm (in.) Hg
Sampling
time,
tain
Total
Clock
time,
2k h
Velocity head
mm (in.) H.,0,
. ( P)
Avg
Flowineter
setting
L/min (ft3/min)
Avg
stack -
°C (°F)
Avg
probe
°C (°F)
Avg
Temperature
sample line
°C (°F)
Avg
readings
flbwmeter box
°C (°F)
;
Avg
container
°C (°F)
Avg
o
o
Quality Assurance Handbook Ml8
-o
-------
FIELD SAMPLING DATA FORM FOR DIRECT INTERFACE SAMPLING
Plant
City
Operator
Date
Barometric press
Initial probe setting
Sampling rate
mm (in.) Hg
°C (°F
Sampling point location
Sample loop volume
Sample loop temp
L/min (cfm) Column temperature:
ml
Run number
Stack dia, mm (in.)
Meter box number
Stack temp
Static press
mm (in.)
Dilution system:
source flow rate
diluent flow rate
diluent flow rate
Dilution ratio
L/min (cfm)
L/min (cfm)
L/min (cfm)
initial /
program rate
final /
Carrier gas flow
/
°C/min
°C/min
°C/min
ml/min
Dilution system check
Final leak check
Vacuum § check
mm (in.) H20
Time of
injection
24 h
Injection
number
Flo*
source
ml/min
nneter(s) s
diluent
ml/min
ettings
diluent
ml/min
stack
°C (°F)
Temperal
probe
°C (°F)
;ure readings
sample line
°C (°F)
injection port
°C (°F)
Quality Assurance Handbook M18-4.2
-------
FIELD SAMPLING DATA FORM FOR ADSORPTION TUBE SAMPLING
Plant
City
Operator
Date
Run number
Stack dia, mm (in.)
Flowmeter calib.(Y) _
Adsorption tube type:
charcoal tube
silica gel
other
Dilution system: (dynamic)
emission flowsetting
diluent flowsetting
Dilution system: (static)
emission flowsetting
Final leak check
Meter box number
Pitot tube (Cp) _
Static press
Adsorption tube number
Average ( P) mm (in.) H20 Vacuum during leak check
m3/min (cfm)
Initial flowineter setting
Average stack temp
mm (in.) H.O
mm (in.) H20 Barometric press
'C (°F) Sampling point location
nm (in.) Hg
Sampling
time,
min
Total
Clock
time,
24 h
Velocity head
mm (in.) H.O,
( P)
Avg
Flowmeter
setting
L/min (ft3/min)
Avg
stack
°C (°F)
Avg
Temperature i
probe, line
°C (°F)
Avg
'eadings
adsorp. tube
°C (°F)
Avg
meter
°C (°F)
Avg
Vacuum
mm (in.) Hg
Avg
o
o
Quality Assurance Handbook MlS-^
-------
ANALYSIS OF METHOD 18 FIELD SAMPLES
Date:
Location:
Analyst:
Plant:
Sample Type:
Type of Calibration Standard:
Number of Standards: Date Prepared:
Target Compound:
Prepared By:
GC Used:
Carrier Gas Used: •
Column Temperatures, Initial:
Sample Loop Volume:
Detector Temp.:
Column Used:
Carrier Gas Flow Rate:
Program Rate:
Loop Temperature:
Auxiliary Gases:
Final:
Inject. Port Temp.:
Calibration Data Standard 1
First analysis/second analysis
Standard concentration (Cact)
Flow rate through loop (ml/min) /
Liquid injection volume (tubes) /
Injection time (24-hr clock) /
Chart speed (cm/min) /
Detector attenuation /
Peak retention time (oin) /
Peak retention time range (min)
Peak area /
Peak area x attenuation factor /
Average peak area value (Y)
Percent deviation from average
Calculated concentration (Cstd)
% deviation from actual (#Dact)
Linear regression equation; slope (m):
Standard 2
Standard 3
y-intercept (b):
Sample Analysis Data
First analysis/second analysis
Sample identification
Interface dilution factor
Flow rate through loop (ml/min)
Liquid injection volume (tubes)
Injection time (24-hr clock)
Chart speed (cm/min)
Detector attenuation
Peak retention time (min)
Peak retention time range (min)
Peak area
Peak area x at ten. factor (AJ/A
Average peak area value (Y)
% deviation from average (%D
Calculated concentration (C )
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
g
)
' (Y -
/•» I-IT-'P -
^-std Or °s
m
b) '
*VV8 =
-A, - Y
Y
v mot 2n -
x ±uu^ ^ua c t -
td ~ Cact
Y
x 100?
Quality Assurance Handbook M18-5.1
-------
PREPARATION OF STANDARDS BY DILUTION OF GAS CYLINDER STANDARDS
o
Date: Preparer: Purpose:
Cylinder Component: Source:
Component Concentration (X-): ppm Certification Date:
Stage 1 Mixture 1 Mixture 2 Mixture 3
Standard gas flowmeter reading
Diluent gas flowmeter reading
Laboratory temperature ,(°K)
Barometric pressure (Pb) (mm Hg)
Flow rate of cylinder gas (qcl) at
standard conditions (ml/min)
Flow rate of diluent gas (
-------
PREPARATION OF STANDARDS IN TEDLAR BAGS BY GAS AND LIQUID INJECTION
Date:
Preparer:
Purpose:
Organic Compound:
Compound Source:
Gas:
or Liquid:
Compound Purity (P) :
% Compound Mole Weight (M):
Gas Injection Mixture 1 Mixture 2 'Mixture 3
Bag number or identification _ _. _ _ _
Dry gas meter calibration factor (Y) _ . _ _ ••
Final gas meter reading, liters _ _ ,
Initial gas meter reading, liters • _ _
Volume metered (VB), liters _______ _ _
Ambient temperature, °C _ _ _ _
Average gas meter temperature, °C _ _ _
Absolute gas meter temp. (T0), °K _ _ ________
Barometric pressure (Pb), mm Hg ' _ _ _____ _
Average gas meter pressure, mm Hg _ _ _ _
Absolute gas meter press. (PB). mm Hg _ _ _
Gas volume injected (Gv ) , ml _ _ . _
Syringe temperature (T_ ) , °K _ ____ _ _
Absolute syringe pressure (P } , mm Hg _ _ _
Calculated concentration (C.) _ _ _
O t mm~—~^—^ - ««^^— i i !• ......
GV x 103 x
P. x TB
. calc
. corr
100*
Vp x Y
Liquid Injection Mixture 1 Mixture 2 Mixture 3
Bag number or identification _ ___ _ _
Dry gas meter calibration factor (Y) _ _ _
Final gas meter reading- liters _ _ _
Initial gas meter reading, liters _ _ _
Volume metered (VB ) , liters _ _ _ _
Average gas meter temperature, °C _ _ _
Absolute gas meter temp. (TB), °K _ _ _
Barometric pressure (Pb ) , mm Hg •• _ ' _
Average gas meter pressure, mn Hg _ _ _
Absolute gas meter press. (PB)t mm Hg _ _ __ . _
Liquid organic density (p) , ug/ml _ _ _
Liquid volume injected (Lv ) , ttl _ _ __^__ __ _
Calculated concentration (C_ ) • _ _
, , „
C = 6.24 x 104 x
M x V0 x Y x P0
8 corp
100%
Quality Assurance Handbook H18-5-6
-------
DEVELOPMENT OF RELATIVE RESPONSE FACTORS AND RELATIVE RETENTION FACTORS
o
Date:
Target Compound:
Surrogate Compound:
Preparer:
Purpose:
Type of Standard:
Type of Standard:
Target Compound Calibration Data Standard 1
First analysis/verify analysis
Standard concentration
Flow rate through loop (ml/min) /
Liquid injection volume (tubes) /
Injection time (24-hr clock) /
Chart speed (cm/min) /
Detector attenuation /
Peak retention time (tRxl/tRxf) /
Peak retention time range
Peak area /
Peak area x atten. factor (Y1/YX) /
Verification analysis conc.(Cx)
Percent deviation from actual
Caculated retention time (rTxf)
Percent deviation from actual
Linear regression equation; slope (m_):
Standard 2
Standard 3
y- intercept (b) :
O
Surrogate Calibration Data
First analysis/second analysis
Standard concentration
Flow rate through loop (ml/min)
Liquid injection volume (tubes)
Injection time (24-hr clock)
Chart speed (cm/mni)
Detector attenuation
Peak retention time (tRsl/tRg.r)
Peak retention time range
Peak area
Peak area x attenuation factor
Linear regression equation; slope (ms)
Standard 1
Standard 2 Standard
(mf):.
y-intercept (b):
Nonretained peak retention time (tM1/tMf):
Relative Response Factor (F_ ):
Relative Retention Factor (rx/s):
m_
Lx/.
(tRsi - tM1)
x F,
Rx
s td
O
Quality Assurance Handbook M18-5-8
-------
DATA FORM FOR PREPARATION OF LIQUID STANDARDS AND DESORPTION EFFICIENCY SAMPLES
Date:
Preparer:
Purpose:
Organic Compound: _
Compound Source:
Adsorbent Material:
Gas:
or Liquid:
Compound Purity (P):
Batch No:
Jt Compound Mole Weight (M):
Desorption Solvent:
Standards in Solvent
Mixture 1
Mixture 2
ml
Mixture 3
Desorption solvent volume (V,),
Compound spike amount (V0), ul
Organic compound density (p), ug/ul
Standard concentration (Cg), ug/ml
Standards on Adsorbent
Adsorbent amount, g
Compound spike amount (V0), ul
Organic compound density (p), ug/ul
Desorption solvent volume (Ve), ml
Desorption time, min
Standard concentration (CB), ug/ml
Mixture 1 Mixture 2 Mixture 3 Blank
GC Operating Conditions
Injection port temperature, °C
Carrier gas flow rate, ml/min
Column temperature:
Initial, °C
Program rate, °C/min
Final, °C
Chromatographic Results
Injection time, 24-hr clock
Distance to peak, cm
Chart speed, cm/min
Retention time, min
Attenuation factor
Standards in desorption solvent:
Peak area (Ae), area counts
Standards and blank from
adsorbent material:
Peak area (AB and
area counts
Mixture 1 Mixture 2 Mixture 3 Blank
Desorption Efficiency Calculation Mixture 1 Mixture 2 Mixture 3
Desorption Efficiency (DE), %
Vo x p x P
Vs x 1002
DE
A. -
x 100*
Quality Assurance Handbook M18-5-9
-------
CALCULATION FORM FOR GC ANALYSIS BY GAS INJECTION
o
SAMPLE CONCENTRATION
CB = ppm, Pr = . on Hg, T± = . °K,
Pi = . _ mm Hg, Tr = . _ °K, BM8 = 0 . ,
K* = 0 ., F =
C. Pr Tt Fr K
Cc = - = ___ ppm Equation 6-1
PI Tr (1 - BW.K)
'If applicable.
O
Quality Assurance Handbook Ml
o
-------
CALCULATION FORM FOR GC ANALYSIS BY LIQUID INJECTION
SAMPLE VOLUME, DRY BASIS AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
V0
= ._ °K. Bw/ = 0. . K' = 0.
P V
bar o
V.ta.dry s 0.3858 = L ~ Equation 6-2
- B
w.
"If applicable.
DESORPTION EFFICIENCY
Qr= , Qtt= , B =
DE = (Q,. - B)/Qa = o . Equation 6-3
SAMPLE CONCENTRATION
Wp = ug, Wb = ug, Bp = ug.
Bb = ug, V.td = . L, DE = 0. .
K' = 0 .
-------
FIELD AUDIT REPORT
Part A. - To be filled out by organization supplying audit cylinders.
1. Organization supplying audit sample(s) and shipping address
2. Audit supervisor, organization, and phone number
3. Shipping instructions: Name, Address, Attention
o
5.
6.
Guaranteed arrival date for cylinders -
Planned shipping date for cylinders -
Details on audit cylinders from last analysis
d. Audit gas (es) /balance gas..
Low cone.
High cone
Part B. - To be filled out by audit supervisor.
1. Process sampled -
Audit location
2.
3.
Name of individual audit
Audit date
5. Audit Results:
O
d. Measured concentration, ppm
e. Actual audit concentration, ppm
f. Audit accuracy:1
Percent1 accuracy =
Measured Cone. - Actual Cone. x 100
Actual Cone.
Low
cone.
cylinder
High
cone.
cylinder
1 Results of two consecutive injections that meet the sanple analysis
criteria of the test method.
Quality Assurance Handbook Ml8-£
-------
METHOD 18 AUDIT CHECKLIST
Yes
No
Comments
Operation
PRESAMPLING PREPARATION
1. Knowledge of process operations
2. Results of pretest audit (+_ 10% or other value)
3. Calibration of pertinent equipment, in
particular, dry gas meters and other flowmeters
4. Selection and checkout of equipment for proper
sampling and analytical techniques
BAGS - reactivity, condensation, & retention
ADSORPTION TUBES - adsorption & desorption
efficiency
DILUTION SYSTEM - dilution ratio
GC/COLUMN - adequate resolution
GC/DETECTOR - acceptable accuracy & precision
ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
5- Results of on-site audit (+_ 10% or other value)
6. Sampling system properly assembled
7. Based on pi tot tube check, is proportional
sampling required (more than 10% flow change)
8'. Dilution system check acceptable (if applicable)
9. Sampling system leak check acceptable
10. Proportional sampling properly conducted
11. Constant rate sampling properly conducted
12. Heater systems maintained at proper temperatures
13. Proper number of samples & sampling time
14. GC properly calibrated
15. Duplicate injections had acceptable precision
16. Recording of pertinent process conditions during
sample collection, samples properly identified,
and calculations properly conducted
POSTSAMPLING
17. Results of off-site audit (+, 10% or other value)
18. GC properly calibrated
19. Duplicate injections had acceptable precision <5%
20. Adsorption efficiency acceptable,>9Q% on primary
21. Desorption efficiency accept able,>50% recovery
22. Adequate peak resolution
23. Bags passed reaction check, less than 10% change
24. Bags passed retention check,less than 5# retained
25. Flowmeters recalibration acceptable
26. Temperature sensor recalibration acceptable
COMMENTS
Quality Assurance Handbook M18-8.2
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.1?
Date May 31, 1991
Page 1
Section 3.1?
METHOD 25 - DETERMINATION OF TOTAL GASEOUS NONMETHANE ORGANIC EMISSIONS
AS CARBON FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
OUTLINE
Section
SUMMARY
\
METHOD HIGHLIGHTS
METHOD DESCRIPTION
1.
PROCUREMENT OF APPARATUS
AND SUPPLIES
2. CALIBRATION OF APPARATUS
3. PRESAMPLING OPERATIONS
4. ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
5. POSTSAMPLING OPERATIONS
6. CALCULATIONS
7. MAINTENANCE
8. AUDITING PROCEDURES
9. RECOMMENDED STANDARDS FOR
ESTABLISHING TRACEABILITY
10. REFERENCE METHODS
11. REFERENCES
Documentation
3.17
3-17
3.17.1
3.17.2
3.17-3
3.17.4
3.17.5
3-17.6
3.17.7
3-17.8
3.17.9
3.17.10
3-17.11
Number
of Pages
2
3
25
9
9
14
30
11
2
9
1
25
°1
-------
Section No. 3.1?
Date Hay 31. 1991
Page 2
o
SUMMARY
Method 25 applies to the measurement of volatile organic compounds (VOC) as
total gaseous nonmethane organics (TGNMO) as carbon in source emissions. Organic
particulate matter will interfere with the analysis and, therefore, a particulate
filter is required. The minimum detectable concentration for the method is 50 ppm
as carbon.
When carbon dioxide (C02) and water vapor are present together in the stack,
they can produce a positive bias in the sample. The magnitude of the bias depends
on the concentrations of C02 and water vapor. As a guideline, multiply the C02
concentration times the water vapor concentration, both expressed as volume
percent. If this product does not exceed 100, the bias can be considered
insignificant. For example, the bias is not significant for source emissions
containing 10 percent C02 and 10. percent water vapor, but it would be significant
for a source with VOC emissions ( near the detection limit and with 10 percent C02
and 20 percent water vapor.
An emission sample is withdrawn from the stack at a constant rate through a
heated filter and a chilled condensate trap by means of an evacuated sample tank.
After sampling is completed, the TGNMO are determined by independently analyzing
the condensate trap and sample tank fractions and combining the analytical results.
The organic content of the condensate trap fraction is determined by oxidizing the
NMO to C02 and quantitatively collecting the effluent in an evacuated vessel; then
a portion of the C02 is reduced to CH^, and measured by a flame ionization detector x*~"\
(FID). The organic content of the sample tank fraction is measured by injecting af J
portion of the sample into a gas chromatographic column to separate the NMO fromV—'
carbon monoxide (CO), C02, and CH^; the NMO are oxidized to C02, reduced to CHft,
and measured by an FID. In this manner, the variable response of the FID
associated with different types of organics is eliminated.
This method is not the only method that applies to the measurement of TGNMO.
Costs, logistics, and other practicalities of source testing may make other test
methods more desirable for measuring VOC contents of certain effluent streams.
Proper judgment is required in determining the most applicable VOC test method.
For example, depending upon the molecular weight of the organics in the effluent
stream, a totally automated semicontinuous:; nonmethane organics (NMO) analyzer
interfaced directly to the source may yield accurate results. This approach has
the advantage of providing emission data semicontinuously over an extended time
period.
Direct measurement of an effluent with an FID analyzer may be appropriate with
prior characterization of the gas stream and knowledge that the detector responds
predictably to the organic compounds in the stream. 'If present, methane (CHA)
will, of course, also be measured. The FID can be applied to the determination of
the mass concentration of the total molecular structure of the organic emissions
under any of the following limited conditions: (1) where only one compound is known
to exist; (2) when the organic compounds consist of only hydrogen and carbon; (3)
where the relative percentages of the compounds are known or can be determined, and
the FID responses to the compounds are known; (^) where a consistent mixture of the
compounds exists before and after emission control and only the relative
concentrations are to be assessed; or (5) where the FID can be calibrated against
mass standards of the compounds emitted (solvent emissions, for example).
Another example of direct use of an FID is as a screening method. If there is
enough information available to provide a rough estimate of its accuracy, the FID
analyzer can be used to determine the VOC content of an uncharacterized gas stream.
O
-------
Section No. 3.1?
Date May 31, 1991
Page 3
With a sufficient buffer to account for possible inaccuracies, direct use of an FID
can be a useful tool to obtain the desired measurements without costly exact
determination. In situations where qualitative/quantitative analysis of an
effluent stream is desired or required, a gas chromatographic FID system may apply.
However, for sources emitting numerous organics, the time and expense of this
approach will be formidable.
-------
Section No. 3.17
Date May 31, 1991
Page 4
o
METHOD HIGHLIGHTS
Section 3.17 describes the procedures and specifications for determining
volatile organic compounds as total gaseous nonmethane organics from stationary
sources. An emission sample is withdrawn from the stack at a constant rate
through a heated filter and a chilled condensate trap by means of an evacuated
sample tank. After sampling is completed, the TGNMO are determined by
independently analyzing the condensate trap and sample tank fractions and combining
the analytical results. The organic content of the condensate trap fraction is
determined by oxidizing the NMO to C02 and quantitatively collecting the effluent
in an evacuated vessel; then a portion of the C02 is reduced to CH/, and measured by
an FID. The organic content of the sample tank fraction is measured by injecting a
portion of the sample into a gas chromatographic column to separate the NMO from
carbon monoxide (CO), C02, and CHA; the NMO are oxidized to C02, reduced to CH4,
and measured by an FID. In this manner, the variable response of the FID
associated with different types of organics is eliminated.
On October 3, 1980 (45 FR 65956), EPA published Method 25, "Determination of
Total Gaseous Nonmethane Organic Emissions as Carbon". Shortly after publication,
testers began to report erratic results with the method and suggested a number of
different causes for the imprecision. As a result, EPA began a program to review
the test method in March 1982. The EPA completed the review and proposed revisions
to Method 25, designed to make the njethod simpler, more reliable, and more/*—\
precise. The results of the various studies on Method 25 are presented in thef J
documents listed in Reference Subsection 3-17-H (References 1 through 8). ^-^
On February 12, 1988, several changes were made to Method 25. The studies had
shown that the basic operating principle of Method 25 was sound, but some changes
in equipment design and operating practices would improve the reliability of the
method. These changes can be discussed!by dividing the method into three parts:
Sampling, sample recovery, and analysis.
The major changes in the sampling equipment are the addition of a heated
filter, a redesigned condensate trap, and a different packing material for the
condensate trap. The purpose of the heated filter is to remove organic particulate
matter from the sample and, thus, eliminate a potential source of imprecision. It
is heated to a temperature of 120 °C (2^8 °F). The new trap design is a simple U-
tube which may be more easily and cheaply produced than the previous design. It
also provides a faster and more complete sample recovery than the existing trap
while showing equal collection efficiency. The new packing material is quartz
wool, which, compared to the previously specified stainless steel packing, is more
durable and has improved collection efficiency.
The major changes in the sample recovery are a new oxidation catalyst, a
simplified recovery system, and lower operating temperatures. The new oxidation
catalyst has proven to be very durable and to provide 100 percent oxidation
efficiency for a wide variety of organic compounds at much lower operating
temperatures than the old catalyst. Thejredesigned recovery system has eliminated
some of the tubing and valving and, thus, reduced the potential for sample loss
during recovery and decreased the recovery time. The lower temperatures for
sample recovery will increase the life expectancy of the recovery system materials
and simplify the operation of the system. /*~\
The major change in the sample analysis system is a new separation column for( J
the nonmethane organics analyzer. This new column provides separation of CO, C02,^>—'
and CH^, from a wider range of organic j compounds than the previously specified
column.
-------
Section No. 3.1?
Date May 31, 1991
Page 5
In addition to these major changes, there are a number of minor changes,
particularly in the areas of quality assurance (QA) and calibration.
Collaborative testing of Method 25 has not been performed. However, results
for analysis of performance audit samples have shown that the revised method can
meet the required relative error of +_ 20 percent of the actual concentration of the
audit gas.
The blank data forms may be removed from the Handbook and used in the
pretest, on-site, and posttest operations. The items/parameters that can cause the
most significant errors are designated with an asterisk.
1. Procurement of Apparatus and Supplies
Section 3-17-1 (Procurement of Apparatus and Supplies) gives specifications,
criteria, and design features for the required equipment and materials. This
section can be used as a guide for procurement and initial checks of equipment and
supplies. The activity matrix (Table 1.1) at the end of the section is a summary
of the details given in the text and can be used as a quick reference.
2. Pretest Preparations
Section 3-17-2 (Calibration of Apparatus) describes the required calibration
procedures and considerations for the Method 25 sampling equipment. Required
accuracies for each component are also included. A pretest checklist (Figure 3-1
in Subsection 3-17-3) or a similar form should be used to summarize the calibration
and other pertinent pretest data. The calibration section may be removed along
with the corresponding sections for the other methods and made into a separate
quality assurance reference manual for use by personnel involved in calibration
activities.
Section 3-17-3 (Presampling Operations) provides the tester with a guide for
equipment and supplies preparation for the field test. A pretest preparation form
can be used as an equipment checkout and packing list. Because of the potential
for high blank levels, special attention must be paid in the preparation of the
sampling equipment. Also the tester must ensure that the agency obtains the
required audit samples for the test.
Activity matrices for the calibration of equipment and the presampling
operations (Tables 2.1 and 3-1) summarize the activities.
3- On-Site Measurements
Section3-17-4(On-Site Measurements) contains step-by-step procedures for
sample collection and sample preparation for transport. The on-site checklist
(Figure 4.2, Section 3.17.4) provides the tester with a quick method of checking
the on-site requirements. The revised sampling equipment and procedures were
designed to help eliminate the contamination of the sample for particulate matter
from the source and to provide better collection of condensible organic compounds
in the trap and must be closely followed to provide more precise measurements. The
audit samples are collected during the field sampling phase. Table 4.1 provides an
activity matrix for all on-site activities.
4. Posttest Operations
Section 3-17-5 (Posttest Operations) presents the posttest equipment
procedures and a step-by-step analytical procedure for determination of the total
nonmethane gaseous organics as carbon. Posttest calibration is not required for
any of the sampling equipment. The posttest operations form (Figure 5.1. Section
3.17.5) provides some key parameters to be checked by the tester and laboratory
personnel. The step-by-step analytical procedure description can be removed and
-------
Section No. 3.1?
Date May 31, 1991
Page 6
o
made into a separate quality assurance analytical reference manual for the
laboratory personnel. Initial performance tests of both the condensible organic
recovery system and the NMO analyzer must be performed before the systems are first
placed into operation, after any shutdown of longer than six months, or after any
major modification of the systems. In addition to the initial performance checks,
daily performance checks and calibrations must be performed. Analysis of two audit
samples is required. Strict adherence to Method 25 analytical procedures must be
observed.
Section 3-17-6 (Calculations) provides the tester with the required equations,
nomenclature, and significant digits. Because of the complex nature of the method
and the large number of checks, an example data reporting format is shown. It is
suggested that a calculator or computer be used, if available, to reduce the
chances of calculation error.
Section 3•17-7 (Maintenance) provides the tester with a guide for a
maintenance program. This program is not required, but should reduce equipment
malfunctions. Activity matrices (Tables 5-It 6.1, and 7-1) summarize all
postsampling, calculation, and maintenance activities.
5. Auditing Procedures
Section 3-17-8 (Auditing Procedure) provides a description of necessary
activities for conducting performance and system audits. The performance audit of
the sampling and analytical phase can be conducted using audit gas cylinders*—v
supplied by the Quality Assurance Division, Atmospheric Research and Exposurf J
Assessment Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. The data processing-*—/
procedures and a checklist for a systems audit are also included in this Section.
Table 8.1 is an activity matrix for conducting the performance and system audits.
Section 3-17-9 (Recommended Standards for Establishing Traceability) provides
the primary standard to which the analytical data should be traceable.
6. References
Section 3.17.10 contains the promulgated Method 25 and Section 3.17.11
contains the references cited throughout the text.
O
-------
Section No. 3.17.1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 1
1.0 PROCUREMENT OF APPARATUS AND SUPPLIES
A schematic of the sampling train used for Method 25 is shown in Figure 1.1
and a schematic of the analytical equipment is shown in Figure 1.2.
Specifications, criteria, and/or design features are presented in this section to
aid in the selection of equipment. Many of the sampling train components can be
manufacturer by the tester or other vendors. Procedures and limits (where
applicable) for acceptance checks are also presented. Calibration data generated
in the acceptance checks are to be recorded in the calibration log book.
During the procurement of equipment and supplies, it is suggested that a
procurement log be used to record the descriptive title of the equipment,
identification number (if applicable), and the results of acceptance checks.
The following procedures and descriptions are only provided as guidance to the
tester and may not be requirements of the method for the initial ordering and check
out of the equipment and supplies. The tester should note that many of these
procedures are required at a later step in the sampling and analytical procedures.
It is therefore in the best interest of the sampling and analytical firm that these
procedures or other similar procedures be instituted as routine practice for
checking new equipment and supplies to prevent later problems and/or delays in
test programs. Table 1.1 at the end of this section contains a summary of quality
assurance activities for procurement and acceptance of apparatus and supplies.
1.1 Sampling
The sampling system consists of a heated probe, heated filter, condensate
trap, flow control system, and sample tank (Figure 1.1). The TGNMO sampling
equipment can be constructed from commercially available components and components
fabricated in a machine shop. Complete sampling systems are commercially available
that have been designed to meet all EPA equipment design specifications. The
following equipment is required:
1.1.1 Heated Probe - 6.4-mm (1/4-in.) outside diameter (OD) stainless steel tubing
with a heating system capable of maintaining a gas temperature at the exit end of
at least 129°C (265°F). The probe shall be equipped with a thermocouple at the
exit end to monitor the gas temperature,
A suitable probe is shown in Figure 1.1. The nozzle is an elbow fitting
attached to the front end of the probe while the thermocouple is inserted in the
side arm of a tee fitting attached to the rear of the probe. The probe is wrapped
with a suitable length of high temperature heating tape, and then covered with two
layers of glass cloth insulation and one layer of aluminum foil.
NOTE: If it is not possible to use a heating system for safety reasons, an
unheated system with an in-stack filter is a suitable alternative.
Upon receipt or after construction, visually check the probe for problems,
and plug in the probe heating system to ensure it will heat. Check the
thermocouple at room temperature to ensure it is functional, and check the probe
heating system in conjunction with the entire sampling system as described later in
Subsection 1.1.10. If desired, it may be checked separately by following the
checkout procedures in Subsection 1.1.10 that relate to the sample probe.
1.1.2 Filter Holder - 25-mm (15/l6-in.) inside diameter (ID) Gelman filter holder
or equivalent with stainless steel body and stainless steel support screen with the
Viton 0-ring replaced by a Teflon 0-ring. Upon receipt or after construction,
-------
Section No. 3.17.1
Date May 31. 1991
Page 2
o
REGULATING
VALVE
DUAL RANGE
ROTAMETER
TEMPERATURE
CONTROLLER
THERMOCOUPLE:
I
PURGE VALVE
THERMOCOUPLE
STACK
WALL
MANOMETER
VACUUM PUMP
ROW
CONTROL
VALVE
STAINLESS STEEL
FILTER HOLDER
ROTAMETER P"""!-
HEATED BOX
STAINLESS
STEEL PROBE
SAMPLE
TANK
VALVE
O
CONDENSATE
TRAP
SAMPLE
TANK
Figure 1.1. Method 25 sampling train.
O
-------
Section No. 3-17.1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 3
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
SAMPLE TANK
CARRIER GAS
SAMPLE
INJECTION
LOOP
SEPARATION
COLUMN
CO,CH4.CO2
INTERMEDIATE COLLECTION
VESSEL (CONDITIONED
TRAP SAMPLE)
BACKFLUSH
NONMETHANE
ORGANICS
OXIDATION
CATALYST
REDUCTION
CATALYST
FLAME
IONIZATION
DETECTOR
• HYDROGEN
COMBUSTION
AIR
DATA RECORDER
Figure 1.2. Method 25 analytical equipment.
-------
Section No. 3.17.1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 4
visually check the filter holder for problems, ensure that the unit will properly
hold a filter and tighten, and, then check the filter holder as part of a unit as
described in Subsection 1.1.10. If desired, it may be checked separately by
following the checkout procedures in Subsection 1.1.10 that relate to the filter
holder.
NOTE: Mention of trade names or specific products does not constitute
endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
1.1.3 Filter Heating System - A metal box consisting of an inner and an outer
shell separated by insulating material with a heating element in the inner shell
capable of maintaining a gas temperature at the filter of 121 ^ 3° C (250 +_ 5°F).
A suitable heating box is shown in Figure 1.3. The outer shell is a metal
box that measures 102 mm x 280 mm x 292 mm (4 in. x 11 in. x. 11 1/2 in.), while the
inner shell is a metal box measuring 76 mm x 229 nun x 24l mm (3 in. x 9 in. x 9 1/2
in.). The inner box is supported by 13-mm (1/2-in.) phenolic rods. The void space
between the boxes is filled with fiberfrax insulation which is sealed in place by
means of a silicon rubber bead around the upper sides of the box. A removable lid
made in a similar manner, with a 25-mm (1-in.) gap between the parts, is used to
cover the heating chamber.
The inner box is heated with a 250-watt cartridge heater, shielded by a
stainless steel shroud. The heater is regulated by a thermostatic temperature
controller set to maintain a temperature of 121°C (250°F) as measured by a
thermocouple in the gas line just before the filter. An additional thermocouple is —-
used to monitor the temperature of the gas behind the filter. f j
Upon receipt or after construction, visually check the out-of-stack filter box\_x
for problems, plug in the heater to ensure operation, check the thermocouple at
room temperature to ensure that it is functional, and then check the box as part of
the unit as described in Subsection 1.1.10. If desired, it may be checked
separately by following the checkout procedures in Subsection 1.1.10 that relate to
the filter heating system.
1.1.4 Condensate Trap - 9.5-mm (3/8-in.) OD 316 stainless steel tubing bent into a
U-shape. Exact dimensions are shown in Figure 1.4. The tubing shall be packed
with coarse quartz wool (8 to 15 um), to a density of approximately 0.11 g/cc
before bending. While the condensate trap is packed with dry ice in the Dewar, an
ice bridge nay form between the arms of the condensate trap making it difficult to
remove the condensate trap. This problem can be prevented by attaching a steel
plate between the arms of the condensate trap in the same plane as the arms to
completely fill the intervening space.
Upon receipt or after construction, visually check the condensate trap for
problems, ensure proper fittings, ensure proper packing, and then check the
condensate trap as part of a unit as described in Subsection 1.1.10. If desired,
it may be checked separately by following the checkout procedures in Subsection
1.1.10 that relate to the condensate trap.
1.1.5 Valve - Stainless steel shut-off valve for starting and stopping sample
flow. Upon receipt, visually check the valve for problems and then check the valve
as part of a unit as described in Subsection 1.1.10.
1.1,6 Metering Valve - Stainless steel control valve for regulating the samplef^
flow rate through the sampling train. Upon receipt, visually check the valve f
problems and then check the valve as part of a unit as described in Subsection
1.1.10.
-------
Section No. 3-17.1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 5
VACUUM PUMP
CONNECTOR
SAMPLE
SHUT-OFF
VALVE
25.4
1.0
FIBERFAX
INSULATION
DIMENSIONS: -DEI
in
lijj/ PROBE
CONNECTOR
3.175
0.125
CONDENSATE
TRAP PROBE
BULKHEAD
CONNECTOR
J
PROBE LINE
THERMOCOUPLE
TO TEMPERATURE
CONTROLLER
cn
FILTER HEAT CONDENSATE
TEMPERATURE TRAP PROBE
CONTROLLER CONNECTOR
THERMOCOUPLE THERMOCOUPLE
Figure 1.3. Schematic of out-of-stack filter box.
-------
Section No. 3.17.1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 6
o
DIMENSIONS:
mm
in
0.89
0.375 ^ 0.035
316SS TUBING
316SS NUT
WALL
O
COARSE QUARTZ
WOOL PACKING
2.25
O
Figure 1.4. Condensate trap.
-------
flFTls.
1
Section No. 3.17.1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 7
1.1.7 Rotameter - Glass tube with stainless steel fittings, capable of measuring
sample flow in the range of 60 to 100 cc/min.
Upon receipt, visually check the rotameter for problems and proper range,
ensure proper fittings, and then check it as part of the unit as described in
Subsection 1.1.10. If desired the unit may be checked separately by following the
checkout procedures in Subsection 1.1.10 that relate to the rotameter.
1.1.8 Sample Tank - Stainless steel or aluminum tank with a minimum volume of 4
liters. Upon receipt or after construction, visually check the sample tank for
problems and minimum size, ensure proper fittings, and then check the sample tank
as part of a unit as described in Subsection 1.1.10. If desired, it may be
checked separately by following the checkout procedures in Subsection 1.1.10 that
relate to the sample tank.
1.1.9 Mercury Nanometer or Absolute Pressure Gauge - Capable of measuring
pressure to within 1 mm Hg in the range of 0 to 1,200 mm Hg. Upon receipt or after
construction, visually check the pressure gauge for problems, ensure proper
fittings, proper range, and proper sensitivity, and then check it as part of a
unit as described in Subsection 1.1.10. If desired, it may be checked separately
by following the checkout procedures in Subsection 1.1.10 that relate to the
pressure gauge.
1.1.10 Vacuum Pump - Capable of evacuating a container to an absolute pressure of
10 mm Hg. Upon receipt, visually check the vacuum pump for problems. Ensure
proper fittings, attach the pump to a vacuum gauge, and determine if the pump is
capable of evacuating to an absolute pressure of 10 mm Hg. Check it as part of a
unit as described below. If desired, it may be checked separately by following the
checkout procedures below that relate to the pump.
1. Calibrate all thermocouples as described in Section 3-17-2. If the
thermocouples are not within 3°C (5°F) of the true temperature, reject or
repair and recalibrate.
2. Calibrate the rotameters as described in Section 3.17.2. If the
rotameters cannot determine the flowrate to within 10 percent of the
actual flowrate over the indicated range, reject or repair and then
recalibrate.
3. Calibrate and leak check the sample tank as described in Section 3.17.2.
The tank is acceptable if no change in tank vacuum is noted over a 1 hour
period.
4. With the sample tank evacuated, assemble the sampling train (including
placing a filter in the filter holder) as shown in Figure 1.1, with the
exception that is not necessary to use dry ice to cool the condensate
trap. Plug the probe tip and verify that the tank valve is closed. Turn
on the vacuum pump, and evacuate the sampling system from the probe tip to
the sample tank valve to an absolute pressure of 10 mm Hg or less. Close
the purge valve, turn off the pump, wait a period of 5 minutes, and re-
check the indicated vacuum. The method allows a leak rate of 1 percent
of the sampling rate, but for this initial check of new equipment it is
recommended that the criteria be increased to no noticeable leak. If a
leak is noted, find the source of it and reject, repair, or replace the
component(s) and repeat the leak check until satisfactory results are
obtained.
5. Release the vacuum and then unplug the probe tip. Set the probe
temperature controller to 129°C (265°F) and the filter temperature
-------
Section No. 3.17-1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 8
controller to 121°C (250°F). Allow the probe and filter to heat for
about 30 minutes. Close the sample valve, open the purge valve, start the
vacuum pump, and set the flow rate between 60 and 100 cc/min. If the
purge system draws gas through the probe and filter at the desired rate,
the purge system is acceptable. If the purge system does not provide the
desired flow rate, repair or replace the system or problem component and
repeat the check.
6. When the temperature at the exit ends of the probe and filter are within
the specified range, close the purge valve and stop the pump. Open the
sample valve and the sample tank valve. Using the flow control valve, set
the flow through the sample train to the maximum rate that would be
normally used (i.e., 100 cc/min). Operate the system for about 30
minutes, adjusting the flow rate as necessary to maintain a constant rate
(+10 percent). The temperature of the probe and filter must remain in
the specified range and the flowrate should be adjustable. If the flow
rate and temperatures can be maintained in the proper range, conduct
another leak check as described above in Step 4. If the flow rate and/or
temperatures cannot be maintained in the proper range, repair or replace
system or problem component(s) and repeat sampling check and leak checks.
1.2 Analysis
The analysis equipment consists primarily of an organic condensate recovery
system for processing sample traps and a nonmethane organic (NMO) analyzer for
analysis of C02 and NMO. The recovery system can be constructed from commercially
available components and components fabricated in a machine shop. The NMO analyzer
can be purchased as a commercial unit or assembled in the laboratory by
modification of a packed column gas chromatograph.
1.2.1 Condensate Recovery Apparatus - The system for the recovery of the organics
captured in the condensate trap consists of a heat source, oxidation catalyst,
nondispersive infrared (NDIR) analyzer, and an intermediate collection vessel
(ICV). Figure 1.5 is a schematic of a typical system. The system shall be capable
of proper oxidation and recovery, as specified in Section 3.17.5- The following
major components are required:
Heat Source - Sufficient to heat the condensate trap (including connecting
tubing) to a temperature of 200°C. A system using both a heat gun and an electric
tube furnace is recommended. Upon receipt, visually check the heat gun and/or
electric tube furnace for any defects. Check any device for heating before use to
determine if a condensate trap temperature of 200°C can be achieved.
Heat Tape - Sufficient to heat the connecting tubing between the water trap
and the oxidation catalyst to 100°C. Upon receipt, visually check the heating tape
for any defects and test to ensure heating of the connecting tubing to 100°C.
Oxidation Catalyst - A suitable length of 9.5-mm (3/8-in.) OD Inconel 600
tubing packed with 15 cm (6 in.) of 3-2-mm (1/8-in.) diameter 19 percent chromia on
alumina pellets. The catalyst material is packed in the center of the catalyst
tube with quartz wool packed on either end to hold it in place. The catalyst tube x—-v
shall be mounted vertically in a 650°C tube furnace. After construction, visually ( j
check the catalyst tube for problems and test the tube heater to ensure heating to V '
650°C.
o
-------
Section No. 3.17.1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 9
FLOW METERS
\
HEAT TRACE (100°C)
SAMPLE
RECOVERY
VALVE
FLOW
CONTROL
VALVE
SYRINGE PORT
VACUUM PUMP
Figure 1.5- Condensate recovery system.
-------
Section No. 3.17.1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 10
o
Water Trap - Leak proof, capable of removing moisture from the gas stream.
Upon receipt or after construction, visually check the water trap for defects,
especially leakage problems.
Syringe Port - A 6.4-mm (1/4-in.) OD stainless steel tee fitting with a rubber
septum placed in the side arm. After construction, visually check the syringe port
for defects, especially leakage around the rubber septum.
NDIR Detector - Capable of indicating C02 concentration in the range of 0 to 5
percent, to monitor the progress of combustion of the organic compounds from the
condensate trap. Upon receipt, visually check the NDIR detector for defects. Zero
and span the analyzer according to the manufacturer's directions.
Flow-Control Valve - Stainless steel, to maintain the trap conditioning system
near atmospheric pressure. Upon receipt, visually check the flow control valve for
defects.
Intermediate Collection Vessel (ICV) - Stainless steel or aluminum, equipped
with a female quick connect. Tanks with nominal volumes of at least 6 liters are
recommended. Upon receipt, visually check the ICV for defects.
Determine the ICV volume by weighing it while empty and then filling it with
deionized distilled water; weigh to the nearest 5 g and record the difference
between the full and empty weights as the tank volume in ml. Alternatively.
measure the volume of water used to fill the tank to the nearest 5 ml«
An alternative to using the rigid containers is the use of flexible bags
of Tedlar or Teflon film. However, the calculations given in Section 3-17-6 are no
longer appropriate since the gas volumes must be measured directly. It is the
responsibility of the tester to apply calculations which are consistant with
directly measured gas volumes.
Mercury Nanometer or Absolute Pressure Gauge - Capable of measuring pressure to
within 1 mm Hg in the range of 0 to 1,200 mm Hg. Upon receipt, visually check the
manometer or pressure gauge for defects and proper operating range and precision.
Syringe - 10-ml gas-tight, glass syringe equipped with an appropriate needle.
Upon receipt, visually check the syringe for defects and proper volume.
1.2.2 NMO Analyser - The NMO analyzer is a gas chromatograph (GC) with backflush
capability for NMO and C02 analysis and is equipped with an oxidation catalyst,
reduction catalyst, and FID. Figures 1.6 and 1.7 are schematics of a typical NMO
analyzer. This semicontinuous GC/FID analyzer shall be capable of: (1) separating
CO, C02, and CH4 from NMO; (2) reducing the C02 to CH4, and quantifying as CH4; and
(3) oxidizing the NMO to C02, reducing the C02 to CHa and quantifying as CH^,
according to Section 3-17-5- The NMO analyzer consists of the following major
components:
Oxidation Catalyst - A suitable length of 9.5-mm (3/8-in.) OD Inconel 600
tubing packed with 5-1 cm (2 in.) of 19 percent chromia on 3-2-mm (1/8-in.) alumina
pellets. The catalyst material is packed in the center of the tube and supported
on either side by quartz wool. The catalyst tube must be mounted vertically in
650° C furnace. After construction, visually inspect the oxidation catalyst f
defects and ensure that the tube furnace is capable of heating to 650°C.
-------
Section No. 3.17.1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 11
CARRIER GAS
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
SAMPLE TANK—>
i
SAMPLE
INJECTION
LOOP
INTERMEDIATE COLLECTION
<— VESSEL (CONDITIONED
TRAP SAMPLE)
SEPARATION
COLUMN
BACKFLUSH
CO, CH4, CO2
NONMETHANE
ORGANICS
OXIDATION
CATALYST
REDUCTION
CATALYST
<—HYDROGEN
1
FLAME
lONEATION
DETECTOR
COMBUSTION
AR
DATA RECORDER
Figure 1.6. Simplified schematic of nonmethane organic (NMO) analyzer.
-------
Section No. 3-17.1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 12
o
COLUMN OVEN
REDUCTION
CATALYST
OXIDATION
CATALYST
H2 AIR
Figure 1.7. Nonmethane organic (NMO) analyzer.
O
-------
Section No. 3.17-1
.Pate May 31. 1991
Page 13
Reduction Catalyst - A 7.6-cm (3-in.) length of 6.4-mm (1/4-in.) OD Inconel
tubing fully packed with 100-mesh pure nickel powder. The catalyst tube must be
mounted vertically in a 400°C furnace. After construction, visually inspect the
reduction catalyst for defects and ensure that the tube furnace is capable of
heating to 400°C.
Separation Column(s) - A 30-cm (1-ft) length of 3.2-mm (1/8-in.) OD stainless
steel tubing packed with 60/80 mesh Unibeads is followed by a 6l-cm (2-ft) length
of 3.2-mm (1/8-in.) OD stainless steel tubing packed with 60/80 mesh Carbosieve G.
The Carbosieve and Unibeads columns must be baked separately at 200°C with carrier
gas flowing through them for 24 hours before initial use. The columns should then
be connected to each other with a 1/8-inch stainless steel union. The column
series should be connected to the sample injection valve so that the sample loop
contents will be injected onto the head of the Unibeads IS column.
Sample Injection System - A 10-port GC sample injection valve fitted with a
sample loop properly sized to interface with the NMO analyzer (1-cc loop
recommended). Upon receipt, visually inspect the sample injection system for
defects and check for proper number of ports and valve fitting size for the
connecting tubing used (1/16- or 1/8-in.).
FID - An FID meeting the following specifications is required:
1. Linearity - A linear response (+_ 5 percent) over the operating range as
demonstrated by the procedures established in Section 3«17'5-
2. Range - A full scale range of 10 to 50,000 ppm CH4. Signal attenuators
shall be available to produce a minimum signal response of 10 percent of
full scale.
Data Recording System - Analog strip chart recorder or digital integration
system compatible with the FID for permanently recording the analytical results.
Upon receipt, visually inspect the data recording system for defects and test
according to manufacturer's instructions.
1.2.3 Other Analysis Apparatus -
Barometer - Mercury, aneroid, or other barometer capable of measuring
atmospheric pressure to within 1 mm Hg. Upon receipt, visually check the barometer
for defects.
Thermometer - Capable of measuring the laboratory temperature to within 1°C.
Upon receipt, visually check the thermometer for defects.
Vacuum Pump - Capable of evacuating to an absolute pressure of 10 mm Hg or
less. Upon receipt, visually check the vacuum pump for defects and test to ensure
capability to reach proper vacuum
Syringes - 10 ul and 50 ul liquid injection syringes. Upon receipt, visually
check syringes for defects and proper volume.
Liquid Sample Injection Unit - 316 stainless steel U-tube constructed as shown
in Figure 1.8 for performing condensible organic recovery efficiency tests. After
construction, visually check the unit for problems, especially leakage around the
rubber septum.
-------
Section No. 3.17.1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 14
CONNECTING T
INJECTION
SEPTUM
o
CONNECTING ELBOW
FROM
CARRIER
DIMENSIONS:
TO
CATALYST
O
316SS TUBING
Figure 1.8. Liquid sample injection unit.
O
-------
Section No. 3.17.1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 15
1.3 Reagents and Other Supplies
Unless otherwise indicated, all reagents should meet the specifications of the
Committee on Analytical Reagents of the American Chemical Society (ACS); otherwise,
use the best available grade.
1.3.1 Sampling - The following are required for sampling:
Crushed Dry Ice - Crushed dry ice is needed to cool the condensate (U-tube)
trap during sampling for better collection of organics and to keep it cold until
analysis. There are no specifications on the dry ice.
Coarse Quartz Wool - Coarse quartz wool, 8 to 15 urn in size, is needed to pack
the condensate (U-tube) traps in the laboratory for sampling. The packing should
not be conducted in the field prior to testing since a trap packed with new quartz
wool must be taken to 300° C and then blank checked prior to its use in a field
test. Upon receipt, check the specifications of the quartz wool. If the proper
wool has been sent, it should be acceptable. If the specifications are not met,
reorder the proper item.
Filters - Glass fiber filters, without organic binder are needed to remove
organic particulate matter from the gas stream during sample collection.
Typically, filters used for Method 5 tests will be satisfactory, if no organic
binders are present. If organic binders are present, they may be released during
testing and positively bias the results. If the tester is not certain about the
presence of organic binders in a glass fiber filter, it should be placed in a
furnace at 300°C for 2 hours which will remove any organic binders present. This
procedure, however, may make the filter more brittle resulting in a greater need
for caution in handling. A check on the amount of organic binder lost can be
determined by weighing the filter both before and after heating. If a significant
weight loss 'occurs (1 mg per filter), the filters probably contain organic binders.
They may still be used, but it is recommended that another type of filter be
ordered and checked in the same manner, since removing the binders with heat may
make the filters too brittle to use safely.
1.3.2 NMO Analysis - Several gases are needed for NMO analysis depending on the
exact analyzer used for analysis. It is critical that all gases meet the require-
ments for background contamination, to ensure that a low background level is
present during sample analysis. The following gases are needed for NMO analysis:
Carrier Gases - Depending on the exact NMO analyzer, two carrier gases will be
needed for analysis. Typically zero grade helium (He) and zero grade oxygen (0_)
containing less than 1 ppm C02 and less than 0.1 ppm C as hydrocarbon will be
required. Upon receipt, check the label for manufacturer's specifications. If the
gases do not meet the above specifications, they should be returned to the
supplier, and new gases obtained and checked.
Fuel Gas - Typically zero grade hydrogen (H2) cylinder gas is needed as a fuel
gas. The hydrogen should be 99-999 percent pure. Upon receipt, check the label
and manufacturer's specifications. If the gas does not meet these specifications,
Itllllreturn it to the supplier, and obtain and check a new cylinder.
-------
Section No. 3-17.1
Date May 31, 1991 x~
Page 16 r A
Combustion Gas - Zero grade air or 02 (as required by the GC detector) is
needed. Upon receipt, check the specifications. If the gas does meet the required
specifications, return it to the supplier and obtain new gas and recheck.
1.3.3 Condensate Recovery - Two gases are needed for condensate recovery. It is
critical that all gases meet the requirements for background contamination, to
ensure that a low background level is present during sample analysis. The
following gases are needed for condensate recovery:
Carrier Gas - Zero grade air, containing less than 1 ppm C as hydrocarbons is
needed as a carrier for purging the C02 from the trap into the sample tank and then
purging the sample from the trap during the oxidation step into an intermediate
collection vessel. Upon receipt, the manufacturer's specifications should be
checked and the gases analyzed for background levels as described in Section
3.17.5. If the gas does not meet the requirements, it should be replaced and the
new gas checked.
Auxiliary Oxtdant - Zero grade 02 , containing less than 1 ppm C as
hydrocarbons may be needed during the oxidation of the condensate trap sample.
Upon receipt, the gas should be checked as described above. Zero grade air may be
used instead of zero grade 02 if the condensible organic recovery efficiency test
(described in Section 3-17-5) can be passed.
1.3^ Condensate Recovery Performance - The following liquid reagents are needed:
Hexane - ACS grade hexane is needed for liquid injection into the liquid
sample injection unit of the condensate recovery system to conduct the condensible
organic recovery efficiency test. Upon receipt, check the container of hexane to
ensure that the ACS grade specifications are met. If they are not met, return it
to the supplier, obtain a new container, and recheck.
••1, ». • , ;
Decane - ACS grade decane is needed for liquid injection into the liquid
sample injection unit of the condensate recovery system to conduct the condensible
organic recovery efficiency test. Upon receipt, check the container of decane to
ensure that the ACS grade specifications are met. If they are not met, return it
to the supplier, obtain a new container, and recheck.
1.3•5 Calibration Gases for Analysts - The concentrations of all calibration gases
should be traceable to National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST)
Standards. For those calibration gases that have corresponding gaseous NIST
standards (i.e., propane and carbon dioxide), traceability should be established
via the EPA's Revised Traceability Protocol No. 1 (Reference 9). For the remaining
calibration gases, traceability should be established to gravimetric NIST
standards. Traceability to NIST is necessary because some calibration gases with
certificates of analysis have shown significant errors when they were compared with
NIST standards. Specialty gas manufacturers should certify the accuracy of their
calibration gases.
Revised Traceability Protocol No. 1 compares the concentrations of calibration
gases to those of gaseous NIST Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) or to those of
gaseous NIST/EPA Certified Reference Materials (CRMs), which are accepted as X~N
equivalent to SRMs (Reference 10). Although explicit accuracy specifications for C j
these EPA protocol gases do not exist, accuracy assessments by EPA have found that ^-—'
many EPA protocol gases are accurate to within 2 percent and that most are accurate
-------
Section No. 3.17-1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 1?
to within 5 percent (Reference 11). EPA protocol gases may be purchased from most
specialty gas manufacturers.
For all calibration gases, the manufacturer must recommend a maximum shelf
life (i.e., the length of time during which the gas concentration is not expected
to change by more than 5 percent from its certified value). EPA protocol gases
have a certification period of 18 months, after which they should be recertified.
Specialty gas manufacturers should be able to produce stability data to support the
maximum shelf life recommendation. The data should be for the same compound,
balance gas, and approximate concentration as requested.
Do not store the calibration gas cylinders in areas subject to extreme
temperature changes. Before each calibration, check the pressure of the
calibration gas in the cylinder and replace any cylinders with a pressure less than
1500 kilopascals (or 200 Ib/sq. in.).
The following calibration gases are required.
Oxidation Catalyst Efficiency Check Calibration Gas - A calibration gas with a
nominal concentration of 1 percent methane in air is required for the oxidation
catalyst efficiency check. Upon receipt of the calibration gas, check its
certificate of analysis to ensure that the correct concentration has been sent.
Verify its certified concentration against calibration gases currently being used
for analysis. Be certain that balance gas differences do not cause measurement
errors in the analyzer used for verification. The verified concentration should
agree within 2 percent of the certified concentration. If 2 percent agreement is
obtained, the certified concentration can be used. If the agreement is between 2
and 5 percent, the verified concentration can be used. If the agreement is greater
than 5 percent, first inspect the analyzer for malfunction and reverify the
calibration gas. If the reverified agreement is also greater than 5 percent,
consult with the specialty gas manufacturer about replacement of the calibration
gas.
The organic condensate recovery system oxidation catalyst efficiency check
compares the concentrations of the methane and C02 calibration gases. The
concentrations of the two calibration gases must agree within 2 percent. Be
certain to compare the calibration gases on a ppm carbon basis. If such agreement
is not obtained, the problem may lie in the catalyst or in the calibration gases.
Inspect or replace the catalyst and reverify the calibration gases' concentrations
before repeating the check. Consult with the specialty gas manufacturer about
replacement of the calibration gases if the lack of agreement persists.
7/WO Response Linearity and Calibration Gases - Three calibration gases with
nominal concentrations of 20, 200, and. 3»000 ppm propane in air are required for
the NMO linearity check and to determine the calibration response factor. Upon
receipt of the calibration gases, check their certificates of analysis to ensure
that the correct concentrations have been sent. Verify the certified
concentrations against SRMs using revised Traceability Protocol No. 1 or against
calibration gases currently being used for analysis as described in Section 3-17-5-
Be certain that balance gas differences do not cause measurement errors in the
analyzer used for certification. The verified concentration should agree within 2
percent of the certified concentration. If 2 percent agreement is obtained, the
certified concentration can be used. If the agreement is greater than 5 percent,
first inspect the analyzer for malfunction and reverify the calibration gas. If
the reverified agreement is also greater than 5 percent, consult with the specialty
gas manufacturer about replacement of the calibration gas.
-------
Section No. 3.1?
Date May 31, 1991
Page 18
•'O
C02 Response Linearity and Calibration Gases - Three calibration gases with
nominal concentrations of 50 ppm, 500 ppm, and 1 percent carbon dioxide in air are
required to determine the overall mean C02 response factor. Upon receipt of the
calibration gases, check their certificates of analysis to ensure that the correct
concentrations have been sent. Verify the certified concentrations against SRMs
using revised Traceability Protocol No. 1 or against calibration gases currently
being used for analysis as described in Section 3-1?-5- Be certain that balance
gas differences do not cause measurement errors in the analyzer used for
certification. For example, carbon dioxide in air response factors will differ
from carbon dioxide in nitrogen response factors for nondispersive infrared
analyzers due to pressure broadening effects. The verified concentration should
agree within 2 percent of the certified concentration. If 2 percent agreement is
obtained, the certified concentration can be used. If the agreement is between 2
and 5 percent, the verified concentration can be used. If the agreement is greater
than 5 percent, first inspect the analyzer for malfunction and reverify the
calibration gas. If the reverified agreement is also greater than 5 percent,
consult with the specialty gas manufacturer about replacement of the calibration
gas.
The analyzer linearity check and NMO calibration requires 10 percent agreement
between the propane and C02 calibration gases. Be sure to compare the calibration
gases on a ppm carbon basis. If such agreement cannot be obtained, inspect the
analyzer for malfunction and reverify the calibration gases. Consult with the^^
specialty gas manufacturer about replacement of the calibration gases if the lacfA
of agreement persists. V_>X
NMO Analyser System Performance Check Calibration Gases - The four following
calibration gases are needed for the NMO analyzer system check:
1. Propane Mixture - A calibration gas with nominal concentrations of 50 ppm
carbon monoxide, 50 ppm methane, 2 percent carbon dioxide, and 20 ppm
propane in air is required for the NMO analyzer system performance check.
Upon receipt of the calibration gas, check its certificate of analysis to
ensure that the correct concentrations have been sent. Replace the
calibration gas if the purchase specifications have not been met. If the
specifications have been met, conduct the NMO calibration check. The
response factor for this calibration gas should be within 5 percent of the
overall mean response factor for the propane in air calibration gases. If
such agreement cannot be obtained, inspect the equipment for malfunction
and verify the concentrations of the components in the calibration gas.
Consult with the specialty gas manufacturer about replacement of the
calibration gas if the lack of agreement persists.
2. Hexane Calibration Gas - A. calibration gas with a nominal concentration of
50 ppm hexane in air is required for the NMO analyzer system performance
check. Upon receipt of the calibration gas, inspect its certificate of
analysis to ensure that the correct concentration has been sent. Replace
the calibration gas if the purchase specifications have not been met. If
the specifications have been met, conduct the NMO calibration check. The
response factor for this calibration gas should be within 5 percent of the
overall mean response factor for the propane in air calibration gases. Be,...
sure to compare the calibration gases on a ppm carbon basis. If suq A
agreement cannot be obtained, inspect the equipment for malfunction and, i\ J
possible, verify the concentration of the calibration gas with an analyzer
employing a different analytical principle (e.g., gas chromatography).
Consult with the specialty gas manufacturer about replacement of the
-------
Section No. 3.17.1
Date May 31, 1991
calibration gas if the lack of agreement persists.
Toluene Calibration Gas - A calibration gas with a nominal concentration of
20 ppm toluene in air is required for the NMO analyzer system performance
check. Upon receipt of the calibration gas, check its certificate of
analysis to ensure that the correct concentration has been sent. Replace
the calibration gas if the purchase specifications have not been met. If
the specifications have been met, conduct the NMO calibration check. The
response factor for this calibration gas should be within 5 percent of the
overall mean response factor for the propane in air calibration gases. Be
sure to compare the calibration gases on a ppm carbon basis. If such
agreement cannot be obtained, inspect the equipment for malfunction and, if
possible, verify the concentration of the calibration gas with an analyzer
employing a different analytical principle (e.g., gas chromatography) .
Consult with the specialty gas manufacturer about replacement of the
calibration gas if the lack of agreement persists.
Methanol Calibration Gas - A calibration gas with a nominal concentration
of 100 ppm methanol in air is required for the NMO analyzer system
performance check. Upon receipt of the calibration gas, check its
certificate of analysis to ensure that the correct concentration has been
sent. Replace the calibration gas if the purchase specifications have not
been met. If the specifications have been met, conduct the NMO calibration
check. The response factor for this calibration gas should be within 5
percent of the overall mean response factor for the propane in air
calibration gases. Be sure to compare the calibration gases on a ppm
carbon basis. If such agreement cannot be obtained , inspect the equipment
for malfunction and, if possible, verify the concentration of the
calibration with an analyzer employing a different analytical principle
(e;g., gas chromatography). Consult the specialty gas manufacturer about
replacement of the calibration gas if the lack of agreement persists.
Note; Little is currently known about the stability of calibration gases
containing methanol in air.. Special attention should be given to the
stability of this calibration gas.
-------
Section No. 3.17.1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 20
Table 1.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR PROCUREMENT OF APPARATUS AND SUPPLIES
o
Apparatus
Sampling
Heated probe
Filter holder
Filter heating
system
Condensate trap
Valve
Metering valve
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Stainless steel cap-
able of heating to
129°C (365°F) at
exit end
Upon receipt, check
heater and thermo-
meter with system
Repair or
replace, and
recheck
Stainless steel with
inside diameter of
25 mm (15/16 in.)
and Teflon 0-ring
Check unit to ensure
that filter is held
properly
Repair or
replace, and
recheck
Metal box consisting
of an inner and an
outer shell separ-
ated by fiber fran
insulation with a
heater capable of
maintaining a gas
temperature of 121°C
+3°C (250 +5°F)
Visually check, ensure
heater is operational,
check thermocouple at
room temperature,
check box as part of
the unit (Subsection
1.1.10)
Repair or
replace and
recheck
O
9.5 mm (3/8 in.)
OD 316 stainless
steel tubing U-tube
shaped, packed with
coarse quartz wool
Visually check, ensure
proper fittings,
proper packing, check
as part of unit
Repair or
replace and
recheck
Stainless steel
shut-off valve
Visually check valve,
check as part of unit
Repair or
replace and
recheck
Stainless steel
control valve
Visually check valve,
check as part of unit
Repair or
replace and
recheck
Rotameter
(Continued)
Glass tube with
stainless steel
fittings, capable
of measuring sample
flow of 60 to 100
cc/min
Visually check, ensure
proper range and
proper fittings, check
as part of unit
Reject or
repair, then
recalibrate
O
-------
Section No. 3.1?.l
Date May 31. 1991
Page 21
Table 1.1 (Continued)
Apparatus
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Sample tank
Stainless steel or
aluminum tank with
a minimum volume of
4 liters
Visually check, ensure
proper fittings, min-
imum size, check as
part of unit
Repair or
replace and
recheck
Mercury manometer
or absolute
pressure gauge
Capable of measur-
ing pressure to
within 1 mm Hg. in
;the range of 0 to
1,200 mm Hg
Visually check, ensure
proper fittings,
range, sensitivity,
check as part of unit
Determine
correction
factor or
reject
Vacuum pump
Capable of evacu-
ating to an absolute
pressure of 10 mm
Hg
Visually check, ensure
proper fittings, de-
termine for evacuating
10 mm Hg, check as
part of unit
Repair or
replace and
recheck
Analysis
Condensate
recovery apparatus
1. Heat source
2. Heat tape
3. Oxidation
catalyst
4. Water trap
5- Syringe port
(Continued)
Sufficient to heat
condensate trap to
200° C
Sufficient to heat
connecting tubing
to 100°C
9.5 mm (3/8 in.) OD
Inconel 600 tubing
packed with 15 cm
(6 in.) of 3-2 cm
(1/8 in.) diameter
19 percent chromia
or alumina pellets
Leak proof, capable
of removing moisture
from gas stream
6.4 mm (1/4 in.) OD
stainless steel
Visually check, con-
duct heat check
Visually check, con-
duct heat check
Visually check
Repair or
replace and
recheck
Replace and
recheck
Repair or
replace and
recheck
Visually check, con-
duct leak check
Visually check
Repair or
replace and
recheck
Repair or
replace and
recheck
-------
Table 1.1 (Continued)
Section No. 3-17.1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 22
o
Apparatus
6. NDIR detector
7. Flow-control
valve
8. Intermediate
collection
vessel
9. Mercury mano-
meter or
absolute pres-
sure gauge
10. Syringe
NMO Analyzer
1. Oxidation
catalyst
2. Reduction
catalyst
Acceptance limits
Capable of indicat-
ing C02 concentra-
tion in the range of
0 to 5 percent
Stainless steel
Stainless steel or
aluminum, nominal
volume of 6 liters
Capable of measur-
ing pressure to
within 1 mm Hg in
the range of 0 to
1,200 mm Hg
10 ml gas-tight,
glass
Suitable length of
9-5 ran OD Inconel
600 tubing packed
with 5.1 cm of 19
percent chromia on
3.2 mm alumina
pellets
7.6 cm length of 6.4
mm OD Inconel tubing
packed with 100 mesh
pure nickel powder
Frequency and method
of measurement
Visually check, check
pressure rating
Visually check, ensure
proper volume
Visually check, ensure
ensure proper sensi-
tivity
Visually check
Visually check
Visually check
Action if
requirements
are not met
Repair or
replace and
recheck
Repair or
replace and
recheck
Repair or
replace and
recheck
Determine
correction
factor or
reject
Repair or
replace and
recheck
O
Replace and
recheck
Replace and
recheck
(Continued)
O
-------
Section No. 3.17-1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 23
Table 1.1 (Continued)
Apparatus
Separation
column
Sample injec-
tion system
5. FID
6. Data recording
system
Acceptance limits
30 cm length of 3-2T
mm OD stainless
steel tubing packed
with 60/80 mesh
Unibeads IS followed
by 6l cm length of
3.2 mm OD stainless
steel tubing packed
with 60/80 mesh
Carbosieve G
10-port GC sample
injection valve
fitted with a
sample loop
A linear response
of +_ 5 percent over
operating range of
10 to 50,000 ppm
CHA, minimum signal
response of 10 per-
cent of full scale
Analog strip chart
compatible with FID
Frequency and method
of measurement
Visually check
Visually check, sample
loop should be of
proper size to inter-
face with NMO analyzer
Upon receipt use
procedure established
in Section 3-17.5
Upon receipt check as
recommended by manu-
facturer
Action if
requirements
are not met
Replace and
recheck
Repair or
replace and
recheck
Return to
manufacturer
or repair
and recheck
Repair or
return to
manufacturer
Reagents and
other supplies
Sampling
1. Crushed dry
ice
2. Coarse quartz
wool
3. Filters
(Continued)
No specifications
8 to 15 urn in size
Glass fiber filters
without organic
binders
None
Upon receipt check
manufacturer's speci-
fications
Check for presence of
organic binders
None
Return to
manufacturer
Return to
manufacturer
' J "7
,' -v '\
/ < A) .
-------
Table 1.1 (Continued)
Section No. 3-17-1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 24
o
Apparatus
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
NMO analysis
1. Carrier gas
2. Fuel gas
3- Combustion gas
As specified by
owner's manual, less
than 1 ppm C02 and
0.1 ppm C as hydro-
carbon
As specified by
owner's manual
As specified by
owner's manual
Upon receipt check
label and manufactur-
er's specifications
Upon receipt check
label and manufac-
turer's specifications
Upon receipt check
label and manufactur-
er's specifications
Return to .
supplier and
check new gas
Return to
supplier and
check new gas
Return to
supplier and
check new gas
O
Condensate
analysis
1. Carrier gas
2. Auxiliary 0.,
3. Hexane
. Decane
Zero grade air con-
taining less than
1 ppm C as hydro-
carbon
Zero grade 02 con-
taining less than
1 ppm C as hydro-
carbon
ACS grade hexane
ACS grade decane
Same as above
Same as above
Visually check to
ensure ACS grade
Same as above
Same as above
Same as above
Return to manu-
facturer and
check new reagent
Same as above
(Continued)
O
-------
Table 1.1 (Continued)
Section No. 3-17.1
Date May 31, 1991
Page 25
Apparatus
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Calibration gases
for analysis
1. Oxidation
catalyst
efficiency
check calibra-
tion gas
2. FID linearity
and NMO cali-
bration gases
3. C02 calibra-
tion gases
Gas mixture with
nominal concentra-
tion of 1 percent
methane
Three gas mixture
standards with
nominal propane
concentrations of
20, 200 and 3000 ppm
Three gas mixture
standards with
nominal C02 concen-
trations of 50, 500,
and 1 percent in air
Visually check
specifications
Check specifications,
compare against
NBS-SRM propane or
previous calibration
gas
Check specifications,
compare against
previous calibration
gases or NBS-SRM
No. 2622 (2% C02 in
N2) diluted with 20%
zero oxygen
Return to
supplier, order
from new
supplier
Return to
manufacturer
Return to
manufacturer
NMO analyzer
system check
calibration gas
1. Propane
mixture
2. Hexane gas
standard
3- Toluene gas
standard
4. Methanol gas
standard
Gas mixture contain-
ing (nominal) 50 ppm
CO, 50 ppm CHA, 2%
C02, and 20 ppm C3H8
in air
Gas mixture contain-
ing (nominal) 50 ppm
hexane in air
Gas mixture contain-
ing (nominal)
20 ppm toluene
Gas mixture contain-
ing (nominal) 100
ppm mehanol in air
Check specifications,
conduct calibration
check which should be
within 52 of initial
NMO response factor
As shown above
As shown above
As shown above
Return to
manufacturer,
check new gas
As shown above
As shown above
As shown above
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.17.2
Date May 31, 1991
Page 1
2.0 CALIBRATION OF APPARATUS
Calibration of the apparatus is one of the most important functions in
maintaining data quality. The detailed calibration procedures included in this
section were designed for the sampling equipment specified in Method 25 and de-
scribed in the previous section. The calibration of the analytical equipment is
described in the section detailing the analytical procedures, Section 3«17-5.
Table 2.1 at the end of this section summarizes the quality assurance functions for
the calibrations addressed in this section. All calibrations including the analyt-
ical equipment should be recorded on standardized forms and retained in a calibrat-
ion log book.
2.1 Sample Metering and Volume Systems
2.1.1 Sample Tank Volume - The volume of the gas sampling tanks used to for
sampling and as intermediate collection vessels must be determined as follows:
1. Mark or number each tank so that it is uniquely identified.
2. Weigh each tank empty to the nearest 5 g-
3. Fill the tank with distilled or deionized water and reweigh to nearest 5
g-
4. Record the data on Figure 2.1 or similar form and calculate the sample
tank volume.
5. Alternatively, the volume of the water used to fill each tank may be
determined to the nearest 5 nil. It is extremely important that all the
water is removed from the tank after calibration.
2.1.2 Volume of Sampling Train from Probe Tip to Sample Tank Valve - The volume of
the sampling train from the probe tip to the sample tank valve must be determined
as follows: '
1. Assemble the sampling train in the same manner as it will be used in the
field.
2. Leak check the sampling system as described below in Section 2.1.3-
3. After the train passes the leak check, attach a sample tank that has been
calibrated and is full of air at ambient pressure to the sampling system.
4. With the inlet still plugged from the leak check, open the sample tank
valve, flow control valve, sample valve, and purge valve to ensure that
the tank is at ambient pressure. Note that the mercury U-tube manometer
is reading zero.
5. Shut the sample tank valve and start the purge pump (or other pump of the
tester's choice).
6. After approximately 2 min, shut the purge valve and then turn off the
purge pump.
7. Open the sample tank valve and read and record the vacuum.
8. Record these data and the barometric pressure on Figure 2.2 or similar
form and then calculate the volume of the sampling train.
9. Repeat steps 4 through 8 twice. The calculated sampling train volume used
for the leak checks during testing will be the average of the three
calculated volumes. If the equipment is similar or the components are
interchangeable for all the Method 25 sampling systems used, the volume
from the probe tip to the sample tank valve only needs to be determined
for one system.
-------
Section No. 3-17-2
Date May 31, 1991
Page 2
o
Sample
Tank No.
Date
Calibra-
ted
Initial
Weight/Volume ,
g/ml*
Final
Weight/Volume ,
g/ml*
...
Sample Tank
Volume ,
ml*
Calibrated
By,
initials
••'••:
• •
*Weight measured to the nearest 5 £ or volume measured to the nearest 5 ol.
Figure 2.1. Sample tank and intermediate collection vessel volume determination.
O
o
-------
Section No. 3.17.2
Date May 31, 1991
Page 3
Calibrated By
Date Calibrated
System Assembled
Tank No.
System Leak Checked
Tank Volume, ml
Barometric Press., mm Hg
Are sampling train components similar and/or interchangeable?
Will the calculated sampling train volume be used for all trains?
Run
No.
1
2
3
Vacuum
Reading, mm Hg
Calculated
Volume , ml
Remarks
Average calculated volume
of sampling system
ml
Calculated volume, ml =
Calculated volume, ml -
Vacuum reading, mm Hg X Tank volume, ml
Barometric press, mm Hg - Vacuum reading, mm Hg
( ) X ( ) = ml
Average volume, nil
= Run 1 + Run 2 + Run 3 =
3
ml
Figure 2.2. Determination of sample train volume from probe tip to sample valve.
-------
Section No. 3.17.2
Date May 31, 1991
Page 4
2.1.3 Rotametevs - Two rotameters are needed, one for purging the sampling
system and a second for controlling the rate of sample collection. Since the
sampling rotameter is used to determine flow rate and maintain a constant
sampling rate, it must have an accuracy of +_ 10% for the flow rate used (60 to
100 cc/min) and a precision of +_ 5% over its range. The rotameter used to purge
the sampling train serves only as an indicator of the flow rate and its readings
are not used in any emission calculations; therefore, the accuracy of +_ 10% and
precision of +_ 5# do not apply after its initial calibration.
Initial Calibration - Both rotameters should be calibrated as part of the
sampling system when first purchased' and at any time the posttest check yields a
calculated sample volume that is not within 10% of the actual sample volume (for
sampling rotameter only) or erratic behavior is noted (for both rotameters). A
calibrated wet test meter, calibrated dry gas meter, or a properly sized bubble
meter should be used to calibrate the rotameters.
Before its initial use in the field, each rotameter should be calibrated as
part of the entire sampling system as described below.
1. Leak check the rotameter as part of the sampling system as follows:
a. Temporarily attach a suitable rotameter (e.g., 0-40 cm3/min) to the
outlet of the purge system.
b. Plug the inlet to the probe. Shut the sample tank valve and open the
flow control valve, purge valve, and the sample valve. Evacuate the
entire sampling system to 10 mm Hg.
c. Note the flow rate as indicated by the rotameter.
d. A leak of £0.02 L/min must be obtained; leaks >0.02 L/min must be
eliminated.
e. Close the purge valve and turn off the pump.
f. Note the vacuum reading.
g. Wait five minutes and take another vacuum reading.
h. If the pressure has changed by more than 20 mm Hg, the leak should be
found and corrected.
2. Attach a wet test meter, bubble meter, or calibrated dry gas meter to
the inlet of the probe.
3- Run the pump for 15 minutes with the flow rate set in the midrange (80
cc/min) to allow the pump to warm up and to permit the interior surface
of the wet test meter to become wet.
4. Collect the information required in the forms provided [Figure 2.3A
(English units) or Figure 2.3B (metric units)] using sample volumes
equivalent to at least five revolutions of the test meter or 10 minutes,
whichever is greater. Three independent runs must be made covering the
top, middle, and bottom of the flow rate range (i.e., 60, 80, and 100
cc/min).
5. Calculate the Yj for each run as shown on the data forms. The Y should
be in the range of 0.9 to 1.1 and the values of Yt should be in the
interval Y +_ 0.05Y, where Y is the average for three runs. If not, re-
calibrate, repair, or replace the rotameter. Otherwise, the Y (calibra-
tion factor) is acceptable and is to be used for future checks and
subsequent test runs. Alternatively, if the Yt's are acceptable and the
Y is outside the range of 0.9 to 1.1, the rotameter may be remarked to
reflect the corrected readings. The corrected readings will then be
used for testing and future calibrations. The completed form should be
forwarded to the supervisor for approval, and then filed in the calibra-
tion log book.
o
o
o
-------
Date
Calibrated by
Meter system no.
Primary meter no.
Barometric pressure, Pn = in. Hg Ambient temperature
, dry gas , or bubble meter
Type of primary meter: wet test
Primary meter readings
Initial
reading
(vpl),a
ft3
Final
reading
(vpf),a
ft3
Initial
temp,°F
(tpl)
op
Final
temp,°F
(tpf)
op
Press
drop
(Vc
in.
W
Rotameter readings
Initial
reading
(vs,).b
ft3 or
ft3 /min
Final
reading
(vs,)b
ft3 or
ft3 /min
Initial
temp
op
Final
temp
(tsf)
op
Press
drop
(Ds),c
in.
H20
Time
min
(e),d
min
Calibration
factors
(YJ,"
(Y)
0 Volume passing through the meter using the initial and final readings; requires a minimum of at
least five revolutions of the meter.
b Volume passing through the meter using the initial and final readings or the indicated flow rate
using the initial and final flow rate setting.
c Pressure drop through the meter used to calculate the meter pressure.
d The time it takes to complete the calibration run.
e With Y defined as the average ratio of volumes for the primary meter compared to the flowmeter
calibrated, Y must be 0.9 to 1.1 and Y1 = Y + 0.05Y thus:
*i '
F] [P. * (D/13.6)]
Vtl)/2je[(tpl + tpf)/2 + 460°F][Pm
-(Eq. 2-3),Y =
Y + Y •*• Y
xl *2 I3
-(Eq.2-4)
Figure 2.3A. Rotameter calibration data form (English units).
T3 O CO
{0 P (D
oq ct o
CD (D rt
M-
3 O
U1 P 3
OO O
LO
VD
to
-------
Date
Calibrated by
Barometric pressure, Pra =
Type of primary meter: wet test
Meter system no.
mm Hg Ambient temperature
Primary meter no.
°C
, dry gas
, or bubble meter
Primary meter readings
Initial
reading
(vpl),a
m3
Final
reading
b
m* or
m3 /min
Final
reading
(V)b
m3 or
m3 /min
Initial
temp
°C
Final
temp
(tsf)
°C
Press
drop
(Ds).c
mm
H20
Time
min
(9)/
min
Calibration
factors
(YJ."
(Y)
0 Volume passing through the meter using the initial and final readings and requires a minimum of at
least five revolutions of the meter.
b Volume passing through the meter using the initial and final readings or the indicated flow rate
using the initial and final flow rate setting.
0 Pressure drop through the meter used to calculate the meter pressure.
d The time it takes to complete the calibration run.
e With Y defined as the average ratio of volumes for the primary meter compared to the rotaineter
calibrated, Y must be 0.9 to 1.1 and Yj = Y +_ 0.05Y thus,
(Vpf -'VpilKt.i * fcsf)/2 + 273°K][Pn * (Dp/l3.6)]
r + Vsl)/2]9[(tpl * tpf)/2 + 273°K][PB + (E
(Eq. 2-7), Y =
(Eq. 2-8)
Figure 2.3B. Rotameter calibration data form (metric units).
13 o en
P f» CO
m ct o
(D CO ff
H-
s: o
o o
2:
cu o
LO
O
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.17.2
Date May 31. 1991
Page 7
Posttest Calibration Check - After each field test series, calculate the
volume of sample that should have been collected during the sample run and
compare the results with the actual volume collected. If the calculated volume
and the actual volume collected are within 10% of each other on the average for
the three runs, no recalibration is needed. If the average sample volumes are
not within 10%, the sampling rotameter should be recalibrated. When either the
sampling rotameter or purge rotameter exhibits erratic behavior during sampling
or purging of the system, it should be recalibrated. Performance of a posttest
calibration does not necessitate changes in the emission calculations.
2.3 Thermocouples
The thermocouples on the sample probes and the filter heating system should
be initially compared with a mercury-in-glass thermometer that meets ASTM E-l No.
63C or 63F specifications:
1. Place the thermocouples to be calibrated and the mercury-in-glass
thermometer in a bath of boiling water. Compare the readings after
the bath temperature stabilizes and then record them on the calibration
data form, Figure 2.4 or equivalent.
2. Allow both the thermocouple and reference thermometer to come to room
temperature. Compare the readings after the temperature readouts
stabilize.
3. The thermocouple is acceptable if the values agree within 3°C (5.4°F) at
both points.
4. Prior to each field trip, compare the temperature reading of the
mercury-in-glass thermometer at room temperature with that of the
thermocouple that is part of the metering system. If the values are not
within 3°C (5.4°F) of each other, replace or recalibrate the
thermocouple.
5. No posttest calibration of the thermocouples is required unless they
demonstrated erratic behavior during the sampling.
2.*f Barometer
The field barometer should be adjusted initially and before each test series
to agree within 2.5*1 mm (-0.1 in.) Hg with a mercury-in-glass barometer'or with
the pressure value reported from a nearby National Weather Service Station and
corrected for elevation. The tester should be aware that the National Weather
Service readings are normally corrected to sea level; uncorrected readings should
be obtained. The correction for the elevation difference between the weather
station and the sampling point should be applied at a rate of -2.5 mm Hg/30 m (-
0.1 in. Hg/100 ft) elevation increase, or vice versa for elevation decrease.
2.5 Absolute Pressure Gauge
The absolute pressure gauge should be calibrated against a mercury U-tube
manometer upon receipt and every quarter thereafter or upon erratic behavior.
Attach the the absolute pressure gauge and mercury U-tube manometer to a "T"
connection with a vacuum pump. Compare the readings at atmospheric pressure.
Pull a vacuum of 10 mm Hg of absolute pressure. Pressure readings should agree
within 3 B™ Hg. If this criteria is not met, make adjustments and repeat the
calibration.
-------
Date
Reference
thermometer
type
Calibi
thermc
type
-
'ated
jcoupl«
use
i
no.
Anbier
refera
it teinpei
calibrb
Heasurec
-ature
differc
I values
Bo:
refer8
.ling wai
calibrb
;er
differc
Calibrator's
initials
0
01
O
p
rt O
Temperature reading of the reference thermometer in °C or °F.
Temperature reading of the thermocouple being calibrated in °C or °F.
Difference between the reference thermometer and the calibrated thermocouple. This difference must
be less than 3°C (5.4°F) for than initial calibration and 6°C (10.4°F) for the calibration check.
Figure 2.4. Thermocouple calibration form.
O CD ft
3 O
000 3
CO O
CO
I-* •
VD H»
VD-J
I-' •
rvj
O
O
O
-------
Section No. 3.1?.2
Date May 31. 1991
Page 9
Table 2.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR CALIBRATION OF EQUIPMENT
Apparatus
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Sample tank volume
Within 5 g or 5 ml
Calibrate initially
and when not within
10% of calculated
volume or shows
erratic behavior
Repair or
replace and
recalibrate
Sampling train
volume
No limits
Calibrate initially
as described in
Section 2.1.2
Repeat
Rotameters
Y = 0.9 to 1.1 and
all Y = Y +_ 0.5 Y
Calibrated initially
and when calculated
volume not within 10%
or erratic behavior
Repair, replace,
and recalibrate
Thermometers
Within 3°C {5.
of true value
Calibrate initially
as a separate com-
ponent with mercury-
in-glass thermometer;
check before each
test against mercury-
in-glass thermometer
Adjust or replace
Barometer
Within 2.5 mm
(0.1 in.) Hg of
mercury-in-glass
barometer or weather
station value
Calibrate initially
using mercury-in-
glass barometer;
check before and
after each test
Adjust to
agree with
certified
barometer
Absolute
Pressure
Gauge
Within 3 mm Hg of
mercury U-tube
manometer
Calibrate initially
using mercury U-tube
manometer; repeat
every quarter or
upon erratic behavior
Adjust to
agree with
mercury
U-tube
manometer
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.17-3
Date May 31, 1991
Page 1
3.0 PRESAMPLING OPERATIONS
This section addresses the preparation and packing of supplies and equipment
needed for the sampling. The pretest sampling checks (Figure 3-1) is a listing of
equipment pretest operational checks which should be completed before leaving for
the field. The pretest preparations form (Figure 3-2) can be used as an equipment
packing checklist. The quality assurance activities for the presampling operations
are summarized in Table 3-1 at the end of this section.
3.1 Preliminary Survey
The preliminary survey may be needed to properly design the final emission
sampling and analytical protocol. Preliminary measurements may include
determining the stack dimensions, the flue gas moisture, stack pressure, and stack
temperature, if the concentration of organics is to be determined on the basis of
stack conditions. Other measurements which may be made, depending upon the
requirements of the applicable regulation and the source operations, include a flow
rate determination, velocity check, and stack gas temperature range. The tester
must determine these requirements and use the proper test methods to establish
these data (i.e., EPA Methods 1 through 4).
One of the primary concerns for any organic sampling program must be safety.
The tester should always question the facility representative concerning general
plant safety requirements and safety in regard to sampling at the selected sampling
site. Every sampling and analysis protocol should address the safety
considerations involved in performing the protocol. Because there are numerous
safety considerations involved in organic sampling, it is beyond the scope of this
Handbook to discuss each one in detail. However, it cannot be over-emphasized that
the tester must always be aware of the safety hazards.
Figure 3-3 may be used to collect preliminary survey data.
3.2 Checking and Calibrating the Apparatus
3.2.1 Sampling System - The Method 25 sampling train (see Figure 1.1) is
commercially available or can be manufactured in-house if the apparatus complies
with specifications in the EPA Test Method (see Section 3.17.10). These
specifications and other performance criteria are discussed in greater detail in
Section 3•17•1•
Heated Probe - The probe's thermocouple should have been initially calibrated
as described in Subsection 3.17.2.3. Prior to each field test, the thermocouple
should be attached to the temperature readout device and the probe thermocouple
reading should be compared with a reference thermometer reading at the ambient
temperature. If the values are not within 3°C (5.4°F) of each other, replace or
recalibrate the thermocouple.
The probe should be cleaned with acetone or methylene.chloride, nitric acid,
and distilled or deionized water. To dry the probe, turn on the probe heater and
purge the probe with UPC air or nitrogen. The objective is to leave the probe free
of contamination.
Leak check the probe and check the probe heater system as part of the complete
train assembly as described below.
-------
Section No. 3.17-3
Date May 31, 1991
Page 2
Date Calibrated by
Heated Probe
Heater system capable of maintaining heat at probe exit at 129°C? yes no
Thermocouple calibrated against reference thermometer? yes no (within 3°C)
Probe cleaned with soap and water and acetone, then dried? yes no
Probe leak checked with sampling system? yes no
Filter Holder/Heating System
Heater system capable of maintaining heat at filter exit at 121°C? yes no
Thermocouple calibrated against reference thermometer? yes no (within 3°C)
Assembly cleaned with soap and water and acetone, then dried? yes no
Filter assembly leak checked with sampling system? yes no
Condensate Trap
Traps burned at 300°C until acceptable blank level achieved? yes no
Nitrogen placed in trap and trap sealed? yes no
Purge System
Rotameter initially calibrated? yes no (accuracy lOJt, precision 5%)
Purge system checked with sampling system and indicated flow? yes no
Sampling Rotameter
Initially calibrated against primary standard? yes no (accuracy 10%,
precision 5%)
Calculated sample volume within 10% of actual sample for last test?
yes no
Sample Tank
Tank volume calibrated gravimetrically or volumetrically? yes no (+_ 5 ml)
Tank cleaned and filled with nitrogen? yes no
Barometer or Absolute Pressure Gauge
Calibrated against mercury-in-glass barometer? yes no
(l 2.54 mm Hg)
Ambient Thermometer
Initially calibrated against reference thermometer? yes no (+_ 1°C)
Figure 3-1- Pretest sampling checks.
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.17-3
Date May 31, 1991
Page 3
Apparatus check
Sampling System
Heated Probe
Heating checked
Thermocouple
calibrated*
Cleaned*
Leak checked
Filter Holder/Heater
Heater checked
Thermocouple
calibrated*
Cleaned*
Leak checked
Condensate Trap
Burned & blank
checked*
Sealed*
Purge System
Pulls flow
Sampling Eotameter
Calibrated or checked*
Sample Tanks
Calibrated*
Cleaned*
Pressure Gauge
Calibrated*
Ambient Thermometer
Calibrated or checked
Sampling Supplies
Dry ice
Fi Iters
Free of organic
binder*
Acceptable
Yes
No
Quantity
Required
Ready
Yes
No
Loaded and Packed
Yes
No
*Most significant items/parameters to be checked.
Figure 3^2. Pretest preparations,
-------
Section No. 3.17-3
Date May 31. 1991
Page 4
I. Name of company
Address
Contacts
Date_
o
Phone
Process to be sampled_
Duct or vent to be sampled_
II. Process description_
Raw material
Products
Operating cycle
Check: Batch
Continuous
III.
Timing of batch or cycle
Best time to test
Sampling site
. Description
Site description
Cyclic_
Duct shape and size_
Material
O
Wall thickness
Upstream distance
Downstream distance
inches
inches
inches
diameter
diameter
Size of port
Size of access
Hazards
area
B.
Ambient temp
Properties of gas stream
Temperature _ _°C
Velocity
F,
Static pressure
Moisture content
Particulate content
Gaseous components
Data source
, Data source
inches H20, Data source
%, Data source
, Data source
N2
02
CO
C02
S0
% Hydrocarbons (ppm) Toxics/Acids (ppm)
H2S
HC1
HF
Other
(Continued)
Figure 3-3- Preliminary survey data sheet.
O
-------
Section No. 3.17-3
Date May 31, 1991
Page 5
Figure 3-3 (Continued)
Hydrocarbon components
PPm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
C. Sampling considerations
Location to set up sample recovery area
Special hazards to be considered_
Power available at duct_
Power available for GC
Plant safety requirements_
Vehicle traffic rules
Plant entry requirements
Security agreements
Potential problems
Safety equipment (glasses, hard hats, shoes, etc.)
D. Site diagrams. (Attach additional sheets if required).
IV. On-site collection of preliminary survey samples
A. Evacuated tank
Tank have been cleaned, heated in furnace and purged
with nitrogen?
Tank evacuated to the capacity of pump?
Filter end of probe placed at center of stack, probe
purged and sampled collected into flask until flask is at
stack pressure?
Stopcocks closed and taped?
Duct temperature and pressure recorded?
B.
Purged flasks
Flasks cleaned and purged with nitrogen?
Filter end of probe placed into stack, sample purged for
2 to 5 min and then stopcocks closed?
Stopcocks taped to prevent leakage?
Duct temperature and pressure recorded?
Stability and adsorption checks conducted?
(Continued)
-------
Section No. 3.17-3
Date May 31, 1991 ^-s.
Page 6 ( )
Figure 3.3 (Continued)
C. Quality assurance performance audit samples
Range of emissions to order proper range of performance
audit samples inlet ppm outlet ppm
Address to send audit samples
D. Bulk samples and screening techniques
Bulk emission sample(s) collected?
Bulk liquid sample(s) collected?
Detector tubes or other screening techniques used?_
E. Safety with respect to sample collection
Can gases be exhausted through purge system? yes no
Can electrical service be used? yes no
Can heated probe and heated filter be used? yes no
Can thermocouple be used? yes no
F. Emission results must be reported in terms of:
ppmC at standard conditions
ppmC at stack conditions
2
ppmC at standard conditions corrected for CO
ppmv as a related solvent at standard conditions
ppmv as a related solvent at stack conditions
pounds per hour of carbon '
o
pounds per hour of related solvent
O
-------
Section No. 3-17-3
Date May 31, 1991
Page 7
Filter Holder and Heating System - The filter holder assembly's thermocouple
should have been initially calibrated as described in Subsection 3-1?.2.3. Prior
to each field test, the thermocouple should be attached to the readout and the
probe thermocouple reading should be compared with a reference thermometer reading
at the ambient temperature. If the values are not within 3°C (5.4°F) of each
other, replace or recalibrate the thermocouple.
The filter holder/heating assembly should be cleaned with acetone or methylene
chloride, nitric acid, and distilled or deionized water. To dry the filter holder,
turn on the probe heater and purge the filter holder with UPC air or nitrogen. The
objective is to leave the assembly free of contamination.
Leak check the filter holder assembly and check the filter heater system as
part of the complete train assembly as described below.
Condensate Trap - Before its initial use and after each subsequent use, a
condensate trap should be thoroughly cleaned and checked to insure that it is not
contaminated. Both cleaning and checking can be accomplished by installing the
trap in the condensate recovery system and heating to 300°C while performing a
system background test (described in Section 3«17-5-2.1). A trap may be considered
clean when its effluent concentration is below 10 ppm. Clean or "blanked" traps
should be filled with nitrogen and sealed to prevent contamination and corrosion.
If a trap cannot be properly "blanked," it should be discarded. The history of the
trap should also be tracked. It is recommended that traps previously used for
inlet sampling be used only for inlet sampling thereafter.
Purge System - The purge system must be capable of purging the probe and
filter holder assembly at a rate of 60 to 100 cc/min. Upon initial receipt, the
rotameter should be calibrated as described in Section 3-17-2. After the initial
calibration, the rotameter and pump should be checked prior to each field test to
ensure that it is capable of purging the sampling system at the rate indicated
above. The rotameter for the purge pump is used only as a flow indicator during
the field test.
To check the operations of the sampling system, the probe, filter
holder/heating assembly, and purge system should be assembled in the same manner
that it will be used in the field with the exception that (1) no filter is needed
and (2) the tank will not be attached. Check the system as follows:
1. Turn on the probe and the filter holder heaters.
2. With the inlet to the probe open, turn the sample tank valve off, turn the
purge pump on, set the flow rate to about 80 cc/min, and allow air to be
drawn through the system until the operating temperatures are met.
3. After the probe and filter holder comes to the proper temperatures (probe
129°C and filter 121°C), plug the inlet to the probe and conduct a leak
check as described in Subsection 1.1.10. If the system does not pass the
leak check, repair or replace the faulty component(s) and repeat the leak
check until it is acceptable.
Sampling Eotameter - The sampling rotameter must be calibrated (1) initially
as described in Subsection 2.1.3, (2) when the posttest calculated volume from the
previous field test is not within 10% of the actual sample volume collected and
(3) any time the rotameter exhibits erratic behavior. If the rotameter is
acceptable using the criteria above, the tester may attach the purge pump after the
sample tank valve and ensure that the rotameter does not exhibit erratic behavior
by pulling a flow of about 80 cc/min. If erratic behavior is exhibited, the
rotameter should be cleaned and recalibrated.
•it'
-------
Section No. 3-17.3
Date May 31. 1991 ^-^
Page 8 f )
Sample Tanks - Each sample tank must be initially calibrated as described in
Section 3.17.2. After the initial calibration, it should be visually checked prior
to each field test to ensure that there are no dents that would effect the total
sample volume. Each tank must also be flushed with UPC air until there is no
response on the NMO analyzer. After a tank is free of hydrocarbon contamination,
it should be evacuated and filled with nitrogen to a pressure of approximately 10
mm Hg above atmosphere. The nitrogen will prevent contamination and corrosion.
Mercury Manometer or Absolute Pressure Gauge - If a mercury manometer is used,
then a barometer will be required. No calibration is required for a mercury
manometer. The manometer or absolute pressure gauge should be leak checked as part
of the assembly as described above. The barometer and/or absolute pressure gauge
should be calibrated against a mercury-in-glass barometer as described in
Subsection 3.17.2.4. If it does not agree within 2.54 mm Hg, it should be
corrected or replaced.
Thermometer for Ambient Temperature - A thermometer is needed to measure the
ambient temperature. If the thermometer is a mercury-in-glass thermometer with a
sensitivity of 1°F, the thermometer should be initially check against a mercury-in-
glass ASTM thermometer as described in Section 3-17.2. After the initial
calibration, the thermometer should only be visually checked to ensure that it is
not broken. If a thermocouple is used to measure the ambient temperature, it
should be checked at ambient temperature against a reference thermometer and should
agree with 1°C.
3.2.2 Sampling Supplies - The following supplies are needed for sampling:
Crushed Dry Ice - Crushed dry ice is needed to cool the condensate trap during
sampling for better collection of organics and to keep it cool until analysis.
There is no specification on the dry ice.
Filters - Glass fiber filters, without organic binder are needed to remove
organic particulate matter from the gas stream during sample collection.
Typically, the filters used for EPA Method 5 sampling are satisfactory, if no
organic binders are present. If organic binders are present, they may be released
during testing and positively bias the results. If the tester is not certain about
the presence of organic binders in a glass fiber filter, it should be placed in a
furnace at 300°C for 2 hours to remove any organic binders present. This
procedure, however, may make the filter more brittle resulting in a greater need
for caution in handling. A check on the amount of organic binder lost during
heating can be determined by following the procedures described in Subsection
1.3.1.
3-3 Packing the Equipment for Shipment
The sampling system is relatively small, made predominately of stainless
steel, and therefore rugged with the exception of the rotameters, pumps, and
pressure gauges. The filter holder system and probe may be packed separately or as
a unit. The other components should be packed conveniently and securely in
labeled containers (as to contents) for ease of identification in the field.
Polyethylene foam can be used to cushion the components. Also, the tanks should be
secured so they do not become dented.
.1
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.17.3
Date May 31, 1991
Page 9
Table 3.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR PRESAMPLING PREPARATION
Operation
Apparatus
Check and
Calibration
Heated probe
Filter holder
Condensate
trap
Purge system
Rotameter
Sample tank
Pressure
gauge
Sampling
Supplies
Dry ice
Filters
Packing Equip-
ment for Ship-
ment
Acceptance limits
Leak free, cleaned,
capable of heating
to 129° C with cali-
brated thermocouple
Leak free, cleaned,
capable of heating
to 121° C with cali-
brated thermocouple
Acceptable blank
level
Capable of purging
at rate of 80 cc/min
Calibrated
Volume calibrated
to +_ 5 ffll and
clean
Range 0 to 900 mm
Hg within 2.5^ mm Hg
No specifications
Glass fiber with
no organic binders
Packed in secure
container
Frequency and method
of measurement
Clean with soap and
water, then acetone;
calibrate thermocouple
against reference
thermometer; conduct
heater check and leak
check with assembly
As above
Check as described in
Subsection 3.17.5,
Check as part of
sampling assembly
Calibrate as shown
in Section 3.17.2
Calibrate and clean
as described in
Subsection 3.17.1.1
Check against mercury-
in-glass barometer
Not applicable
Check or heat filter
Before field trip,
pack in shipping
container
Action if require-
ments are not met
Repeat cleaning,
calibration, and/or
heater and leak
checks
As above
Repeat burnout and
repeat blank check
or replace and repeat
Repair and repeat
Clean and recalibrate
Recalibrate and/or
reclean
Adjust and repeat
calibration
Not applicable
Replace
Repack
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. S.I?.1
Date May 31. 1991
Page 1
4.0 ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
On-site activities include transporting the equipment to the test site,
unpacking and assembling the equipment, sampling for total gaseous nonmethane
organics, and recording the data. The associated quality assurance activities are
summarized in Table 4.1 at the end of this section.
4.1 Transport of Equipment to the Sampling Site
The most efficient means of transporting the equipment from ground level to
the sampling site (often above ground level) should be decided during the
preliminary site visit or by prior correspondence. Care should be taken to
prevent damage to the equipment or injury to test personnel during the moving. A
clean "laboratory" type area free of excessive dust and organic compounds should
be located and designated for preparing the tanks, traps, and filter holder, and
for sample recovery.
4.2 Preliminary Measurements and Setup
It is recommended that a preliminary survey be conducted prior to sampling and
analysis, unless adequate prior knowledge of the source and/or information, is
available. Testing must be conducted at the proper sampling locations and during
the proper process and control equipment operating cycles or periods. The tester
should refer to Subsection 3«17«3«1 regarding the information that is typically
needed to establish the proper sampling and analysis protocol. The accuracy of
sampling and analysis following handling and transportation of the sampling system
to and from the sampling site is determined using a cylinder gas audit.
One of the primary concerns for any organic sampling program must be safety.
The tester should always question the facility representative concerning general
plant safety requirements and safety in regard to sampling at the selected sampling
site. Every sampling and analysis protocol should address the safety considera-
tions involved in performing the protocol. Because there are numerous safety
considerations involved in organic sampling, it is beyond the scope of this
Handbook to discuss each one in detail. However, it cannot be over-emphasized that
the tester must always be aware of the safety hazards.
4.3 Sampling
Because of the unlimited variations in sampling organic compounds from
potential source types, only the more general common situations and problems are
addressed in this section. Both required and recommended quality assurance/control
checks and procedures are provided to assist in the collection of acceptable
quality data and to assess the accuracy of the sampling and analysis.
On-site sampling includes the following steps:
1. Conducting preliminary measurements and setup of the recovery area.
2. Preparation and setup of the sampling system.
3. Connection of electrical service and leak check of the sampling system.
4. Heating the probe and filter to proper temperature.
5. Insertion of the probe into the duct and sealing the duct.
6. Purging of the sampling system.
7- Constant rate sampling.
8. Recording data.
/•
(-I
-------
Section No. 3.1?.4
Date May 31, 1991
Page 2
9. Recovering the sample and its transportation to the laboratory.
4.3.1 Preliminary Measurements and Setup of Recovery Area - All test personnel
should be knowledgeable of the plant safety requirements. This includes areas that
should not be entered and whether the plant will allow the use of electrical
service in the sample collection area. The risk to test personnel of being in
process areas handling organic compounds, removing gases from these processes, and
venting sample gases into the sample collection area may be significant. The plant
may require that no electrical service be used and/or that the sample gases removed
from the process during the pretest purging of the sampling system be adsorbed onto
some vehicle such as a resin or charcoal or vented back into the process.
After all testing personnel are familiar with plant safety requirements and
all potential safety hazards, preliminary measurements and setup may begin. The
sampling site should be checked to ensure that adequate electrical service is
available (if allowed). The stack dimensions are measured and recorded (if
applicable) on a field sampling data sheet such as the one shown if Figure 4.1.
If the concentration of the organics are to be determined on any basis other than
ppmC at standard conditions, the corresponding preliminary measurements should be
made at this time. Moisture content of the stack cannot be measured by Method 25.
Therefore, if the final emissions are to be presented in terms of stack
concentration or mass emission rate, or are to be corrected to a C02 concentration,
or to an equivalent solvent basis, Methods 1 through 4 will most likely need to be
conducted simultaneously with Method 25 • Prior to final sampling, the tester must
determine on what basis the final results are to presented.
If the emissions are to be presented in terms of a mass emission rate, the
flow rate of the stack gas, including its moisture content, must be determined. In
this case, it is preferable that the sampling location be selected in accordance
with Method 1 (or Method 1A, if applicable). If this is impractical, it should be
selected to minimize flow disturbances. The number and locations of sampling
points for the velocity traverse are selected according to Method 1 (see Section
3.0:1 of this Handbook); the traverse is conducted according to Method 2 (see
Section 3.1 of this Handbook). Note; The Method 25 sampling is conducted at a
single point of average velocity. If it is unsafe to conduct a preliminary
velocity traverse or a traverse is not required, the sampling may be conducted at
the center of the duct or at a point at least 3 feet into the duct (whichever is
less). The port must be sealed well and there must be no reason to suspect that
the emission concentration is not uniform across the stack.
Method 25 requires constant rate sampling; the sampling rate is not changed
with regard to the flue gas flow rate. However, if the emissions are presented on
a mass emission basis, the flue gas flow rate must be measured during each Method
25 sample run and the corresponding flow rate used to determine the mass emission
rate for that run.
Select a total sampling time greater than or equal to the minimum sampling
time specified in the applicable subpart of the regulation or other applicable
emission standard. The data will be recorded at 5-minute intervals.
A clean "laboratory" type area should be found to load the filter, recover the
samples, conduct orsat analyses, prepare and recover the moisture sampling train,
and to store other sampling equipment. This area should be free of excess dust or
high levels of organics. Because of the relatively small size of the Method 25
sampling equipment and the nature of Method 25 sample recovery, the stack location
can often be used as the recovery area.
o
o
o
.(i
-------
Section No. 3.17-4
Date May 31. 1991
Page 3
Company Name
Address
Run No.
Date
Sampling Location ; Start Time _
Tank No. Trap No. Sampling Train No. Finish Time
Thermocouple No. Barometer No. Operator
Vacuum Gauge No.
Tank Volume liters Train Volume
cc
Calculated Allowable Change p
cm Hg
TANK PARAMETERS
Parameter
Pretest
Posttest
Barometric
Pressure
in. Hg
mm Hg
Tank
Temp.
op
°C
Final Pressure
Tank Pressure
mm Hg
Gauge
Absolute
Leak Check
(cm Hg/min)
Tank
System
SAMPLE DATA
Clock Time
Tank Vacuum or
Gauge Pressure,
in. Hg (mm Hg)
Flow Meter
Setting, cc/min
Sample Gas Temp., °F (°C)
Probe Exit
Filter Inlet
Figure U.I. Field sampling data form.
-------
Section No. 3.1?.4
Date Hay 31, 1991 ^-^
Page 4 f J
4.3.2 Sampling System Preparation - Sampling system preparation includes (1) leak
checking the tanks, (2) assembling the sampling train, and (3) leak checking the
entire sampling system. This preparation should be conducted as follows:
1. The sample tanks should be evaluated to 10 mm Hg or less absolute
pressure. The pressure must be measured with a mercury U-tube manometer
or absolute pressure gauge capable of measurement within 1 mm Hg. Record
the tank pressure on the field sampling data form (Figure 4.1 or similar
form). Close the sample tank valve and allow the tank to sit for 60
minutes. The tank pressure should then be rechecked using the same
pressure gauge and this pressure recorded. If after 60 minutes no
noticeable change (less than 4 mm Hg) has occurred in the tank pressure,
the tank is acceptable for testing. The tank evacuation and leak check
may be conducted either in the laboratory or the field.
2. Just before sampling train assembly, measure the tank vacuum using a
mercury U-tube manometer or absolute pressure gauge capable of measurement
to within 1 mm Hg. Record this pressure, the ambient temperature, and the
current barometric pressure on the field sampling data form.
3. Close the sample tank valve and assemble the sampling system as shown in
Figure 1.1.
4. Immerse the condensate trap body in dry ice. The point where the inlet
tube joins the trap body should be 2.5 to 5 cm above the top of the dry
ice.
5. After assembling the sampling train, plug the probe tip, and make certain
that the sample tank valve is closed. /"""N
6. Turn on the purge vacuum pump, and evacuate the sampling system from the ( j
probe tip to the sample tank valve to an absolute pressure of 10 mm Hg or ^—
less and record the pressure on the field sampling data form.
7. Close the purge valve, turn off the pump, wait 5 minutes, and recheck the
indicated pressure and record this reading. The change in the absolute
pressure of the tank during the 5-min period is the measured pressure
change (delta P). Note; A less sensitive pressure gauge, which is
standard on commercially available equipment and reads pressure to the
nearest 0.5 in. Hg, can be used for indication of the vacuum during
testing, but cannot be used for measuring the tank pressure and for the
leak check procedure. The tester must conduct the leak check by attaching
the mercury U-tube manometer or pressure gauge at the probe inlet.
The sample tank must remain closed. If opened, the extremely large volume
of the tank compared to the sample system makes detecting a small leak
extremely difficult.
8. Calculate the maximum allowable pressure change based on a leak rate of 1
percent of the sampling rate using the equation below. Record it on the
field sampling data form. This should be compared to the measured P
from Step 7 which must be less than or equal to the allowable P
calculated in Equation 4-1.
P = 0.01 FPb9 Eq. 4-1
vt
Where:
P = Allowable change, cm Hg,
F = Sampling flow rate, cc/min,
Pb = Barometric pressure, cm Hg,
8 = Leak check period, min, and
Vt = Sampling train volume from probe tip to tank volume, cc.
•J/
o
-------
Section No. 3.17.4
Date May 31, 1991
Page 5
9. If the measured pressure change exceeds the calculated limit, correct the
problem before beginning sampling.
10. Mark the probe such that when placed in the stack, the nozzle will be at a
point of average velocity. Alternatively, if the flow cannot be measured
or does not have to be measured, mark the probe such that the nozzle will
be placed at the center of the duct or a point at least three feet into
the duct (whichever is less).
11. Calculate the sampling rate for the test by dividing sampling time
(minutes) into 80% of the sample tank volume (cc). The resulting flow
rate, in cc/min, will be used for the testing and will provide a margin of
error.
12. Complete all remaining entries on the field sampling data form that can be
completed prior to the start of the test run. This includes all facility,
sampling train component, and run information plus the barometric
pressure.
4.3.3 Constant Rate Sampling - Sampling must be conducted at a constant rate (+_
10%) over the duration of the sampling period at a rate of between 60 and 100
cc/min. Follow the steps below to obtain a constant rate sample:
1. Unplug the probe tip, and place the probe into the stack such that the
probe is perpendicular to the duct or stack axis and the probe tip (or
nozzle) is located at a point of average velocity with the tip facing away
opposite of the direction of gas flow. For ducts with a negative static
pressure, sufficiently seal the sampling port to prevent air in-leakage
around the probe.
2. Set the probe temperature controller to 129°C (265°F) and the filter
temperature controller to 121°C (250°F). Allow the probe and filter to
heat for about 30 minutes prior to purging the train.
3. To purge the probe and filter assembly, close the sample valve, open the
purge valve, and start the vacuum pump. Set the flow rate between 60 and
100 cc/min, and purge the train with sample gas for at least 10 minutes.
4. When the temperatures at the exit ends of the probe and filter are within
their specified ranges, sampling may begin.
5. Check the dry ice level around the condensate trap, and add dry ice, if
necessary.
6. To begin sampling, close the purge valve and stop the pump. Record the
start time. Open the sample valve and the sample tank valve. Using the
flow control valve, set the flow through the sampling train to the
calculated flow rate. Record the tank vacuum, flow rate setting, probe
temperature, and filter temperature.
7. Adjust the flow rate as necessary to maintain a constant rate •(+_ 10%)
throughout the sampling period. Also, adjust the probe and temperature
controllers as necessary to maintain the proper temperatures.
8. Record the sample tank vacuum, flowmeter settings, probe temperature, and
filter temperature at 5~°inute intervals.
9- Sample collection ends when the total sampling time is reached or when the
constant flow rate can no longer be maintained due to reduced sample tank
vacuum. If sampling must be interrupted before reaching the minimum
sampling time (specified in the applicable regulation) because a constant
flow rate cannot be maintained, proceed as follows: Record the sample
tank pressure and temperature, close the sample tank valve, remove the
used sample tank from the sampling train (without disconnecting other
parts of the sampling train). Take another evacuated and leak-checked
-------
Section No. 3.17-4
Date May 31, 1991
Page 6 /"""N
sample tank, measure and record the new tank vacuum, and attach the new
tank to the sampling train. After the new tank is attached to the
sampling train, proceed with sampling until the required minimum sampling
time has been reached.
10. After sampling is completed, close the flow control valve, and record the
final tank vacuum; then record the tank temperature and the barometric
pressure. Close the sample tank valve.
The sampling train will be recovered as described below. After the trap and
tank are disconnected from the sampling train, both the Sampling System Preparation
procedure (steps 1 through 12) and Constant Rate Sampling procedure (steps 1
through 10) are repeated for the next sample run. If the tester feels that the
filter will not become plugged during the subsequent sample run, the probe and
filter holder/filter assembly including the used filter may be used for any
proceeding sample runs.
A cylinder gas performance audit shall be conducted during the sample
collection phase of the test. The procedures for collecting the cylinder gas are
described in Section 3-17«8« Method 25 requires that each test be audited with two
concentrations of cylinder gases. Since the tester must have two sampling trains,
a regulator, connecting tubing, and a sampling manifold available for the audit,
these items must be included in the test protocol. The collection of the audit
gases should be conducted in the same manner as collection of the field samples
with the exception that the probe, filter holder, and purge system are not used for
collection of the audit gases. If the agency representative is not present at the
start of field sampling, the tester should wait until the conclusion of the field
test to conduct the audit; it is always preferable to have the
representative present during the audit. The tester should not break the seal
the audit cylinders until just prior to collecting the audit samples to provide the
agency with the maximum opportunity to observe all steps in the collection of the
field samples and the audit samples.
4.3.4 Sample Recovery - Prior to sample recovery, the flow control valve and the
sample tank valve should be closed and the field sampling data form should be
completed. If the sampling location is not suitable for conducting sample
recovery, the sampling train should be removed to the sample recovery area;
otherwise, the sample may be recovered at the sampling location. Samples should
be recovered as follows:
1. Disconnect the sample tank from the sampling system. If the less
sensitive pressure gauge (see Note in Subsection 4.3.2) was used for
sampling, the tank should be immediately attached to the more sensitive
gauge (reading to within 1 mm Hg) and the tank pressure recorded.
2. Disconnect the condensate trap at the flowmetering system, and tightly
seal both ends of the trap. The probe (from the stack to the filter) is
not included as part of the condensate sample.
3- Pack the trap in dry ice during storage and shipping and until the samples
are analyzed.
4. Ensure that the condensate trap and the sample tank(s) are properly
identified by the test run number and their corresponding identification
numbers are properly entered on the field sampling data form. The use of
a standardized label is encouraged and is helpful in ensuring consistent
identification by the laboratory staff. x—N
5. Label a clean condensate trap and tank as sample blanks. These will be( )
analyzed in the same manner as the field samples and then used tox J
determine the blank level of the sampling system.
-------
Section No. 3.17-4
Date May 31, 1991
Page 7
4.4 Sampling Problems
Because of the large number and variety of organic processes, it is not
possible to discuss all the sampling problems related to Method 25 sampling. Only
the seven most common problems will be addressed: (1) high sample gas moisture
content and freezing of the trap, (2) no use of electrical service in sampling
area, (3) conversion of C02 to a carbonate in the trap, (4) use of Method 25 for
measuring low levels of organics, (5) sample contamination, (6) sampling and
analysis by different companies, and (7) measurement in ducts containing organic
droplets.
4.4.1 High Gas Sample Moisture Content and Freezing of Trap - If the sample gas
has a high moisture content, the small line running from the filter to the
condensate trap tends to freeze and the moisture blocks the sample gas flow. For
this reason, the trap should clear the dry ice by 2.5 to 5 cm. If freezing of the
moisture in the line continues to be a problem, the line may be insulated to
improve heat transfer. If the problem persists and sampling cannot be conducted,
the tester may place a "preliminary" trap in front of the "primary" trap. The
"primary" trap should be placed in an ice bath and the second trap placed in the
dry ice bath. After sample recovery, both traps are placed in dry ice until
analysis.
4.4.2 Use Electrical Service Not Permitted for Probe and Filter Heating - If, for
safety reasons, the plant cannot allow the use of electrical service at the
sampling site, sampling should be conducted using an in-stack filter. The filter
should consist of a stainless steel tube packed with quartz wool, similar to the
sampling filter in the original version of Method 25. The condensate trap is
connected directly to the in-stack filter, and the sampling system is not purged.
Recovery of the condensate trap does not include the in-stack filter. The
condensate trap must comply with the revised Method 25 specifications.
'...-'-. t i .
4.4.3 Conversion of C02 to Carbonate in Trap - It has been demonstrated that if
ammonia is present in the duct during testing, the C02 can be converted to
carbonate during testing. This conversion results in a high bias during the
analysis of the trap. If this problem occurs, consult the Administrator for an
alternative procedure.
4.4.4 Use of Method 25 for Measuring Low Levels of Organics - Method 25 was not
intended to measure organics at levels below 50 ppmC. However, if the tester has
no other options. Method 25 can be used under the following conditions: (1) extreme
caution must be used in preparing the traps and tanks and (2) two traps and two
tanks should be set aside as field blanks with the analytical results subtracted
from the field sample values. This approach will improve measurements at lower
level sources, although the precision and accuracy of the method will be poor.
4.4.5 Sample Contamination - Sample contamination is a major problem with Method
25 sampling and analysis. Precautions to prevent contamination are listed below:
1. Pretest preparation of the probe, filter holder, traps, and tanks cannot
be overemphasized. The probe and filter holder assembly must be cleaned
in the manner prescribed to eliminate organic materials. The traps must
be burned after analysis to remove any organics. The traps should be
filled with nitrogen under pressure and their history should be tracked.
It is recommended that no trap previously used for sampling at high
-------
Section No. 3-1?.4
Date May 31, 1991
Page 8
organic levels be used for sampling extremely low levels of organics.
2. All components of the train should be maintained such that the surfaces
are never exposed to organics (e.g., oil or other organic compounds),
particularly the quick-connects or fittings.
3. All other components, such as the tubing used to connect the audit
cylinders to the sampling manifold, must be free of organics.
4.4.6 Sampling and Analysts by Different Companies - Because of the small number
of laboratories that conduct Method 25 analysis, a large portion of the Method 25
sampling and analysis is conducted by two different companies (i.e., the sampling
company and the analytical laboratory). This creates problems in assigning
responsibility when audit sample results are not acceptable. If the sampling
company wants to check the consistency of the analytical results (especially for
low level organic sampling), the tester should obtain extra traps and cylinders
from the analytical laboratory. These clean traps and cylinders should not be
opened, marked as if they were a sample, and submitted for analysis with the field
samples.
4.4.7 Measurement in Ducts Containing Organic Droplets - If organic droplets exist
in the duct to be sampled, the Method 25 results can be greatly biased. The tester
should first try to find another location where the droplets do not exist. If this
is not possible, two filters may need to be placed in the system with both being
replaced after each sample run. The addition of an in-stack filter should help
collect organic droplets and will reduce the loading on the out-of-stack (second)
filter.
4.5 Sample Logistics and Packing Equipment
The sampling and sample recovery procedures are followed until the required
number of (1) runs are completed, (2) audit samples are collected, and (3) blank
samples are labeled. Log all data on the sample recovery and integrity data form,
Figure 4.2. At the conclusion of the test:
1. Check all traps and tanks for proper labeling (time, date, location, test
run number, and any other pertinent documentation). Be sure that blanks
have been set aside and labeled.
2. If possible, make a copy of the field data form(s) in case the originals
are lost.
3. Examine all tanks and traps for damage and ensure that the traps are
packed in a sufficient amount of dry ice for transport to the base
laboratory. Ensure that the containers are labeled properly for shipping
to prevent loss of samples or equipment.
4. Review the field sampling data form and any other completed data forms to
ensure that all data have been recorded and that all forms are present.
o
o
-------
Plant Name
Sample Recovery Person
Plant Location
RECOVERED SAMPLES
Run
No.
Sample Type
Inlet Outlet Audit Blank
Trap
No.
Placed on
Dry Ice
Tank
No.
Date
Recovered
Time
Recovered
Remarks
LABORATORY CUSTODY
Date of Laboratory Custody
All traps still on dry ice?
Remarks
Laboratory Person Taking Custody
All samples identifiable?
Figure ^.2. Sample recovery and integrity data form.
LO C
H* •
*
«J
H* •
vo-
H1 •
J
-------
Section No. 3-17.4
Date May 31, 1991
Page 10
Table 4.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
o
Characteristic
Preliminary
determinations
and
measurements
Sampling
system pre-
paration
(Continued)
Acceptance limits
If final results on
stack concentration
basis, determine the
moisture content of
stack gas
If final results on
emission rate basis,
determine moisture
content and flow
rate of stack gas
Determine stack
dimensions
Select sampling
time y minimum ,
total 'sampling time
in applicable!
emission standard;
number of minutes
between readings
shouldjbe an integer
Leak check tanks,
measure pressure
with manometer or
absolute pressure
gauge to within
1 mm Hg :
Assemble sample
train as shown in
Figure 1.1
Mark the probe such
that nozzle will
be at the point of
average velocity; if
flow can not or
does not need to be
be measured, place
nozzle in center or
or 3 feet into duct
Frequency and method
of measurement
Once each field test;
use wet bulb/dry bulb
thermometer, Method
4, or sling psychro-
meter
See above for
moisture content;
for flow rate, once
each field test using
Method 1 location,
if possible, and
Method 2 procedures
Prior to sampling,
using tape measure
Prior to sampling
Prior to sampling
Prior to sampling,
inspect all
connections
Prior to sampling,
determine using
stack dimensions
Action if require-
ments are not met
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
O
Repair or replace
if leaks found
Check for leaks,
repair system;
repeat check
Reposition
O
-------
Table 4.1 (Continued)
Section No. 3-17.4
Date May 31, 1991
Page 11
Characteristic
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action of require-
ments are not met
Sampling system
preparation
(continued)
Assemble system as
shown in Figure
1.1; no leakage
Check dry ice
level, and add
ice, if necessary
Close the purge
valve and stop
the pump; record
start time, open
sample valve and
sample tank, set
flow to calculated
flow rate and
record the tank
volume, flow rate
setting, probe
temp and filter
temp
Adjust flow rate
to maintain a
constant rate and
adjust probe and
temp controllers
as necessary to
maintain proper
temperatures
Record sample
tank vacuum, flow
meter settings,
probe temp and
filter temp at
5-min intervals
throughout sampling
Calculate sampling
rate for the test
Before sample collect-
ion visually and
physically inspect all
connections
Prior to sampling
To begin sampling
Check for leaks;
repair system;
repeat check
Complete
Complete
During sampling;
flow rate should
be kept at +_ 10%
throughout the
sampling period
During sampling
Repeat sampling
Complete
(Continued)
Prior to sampling;
divide sampling
time (min) into 80%
of the sample tank
volume (cc)
Complete
/ XI ,f
'' V<" '
-------
Section No. 3-17.4
Date May 31, 1991
Page 12
Table
(Continued)
o
Characteristic
Constant rate
sampling
(Continued)
Acceptance limits
Adjust probe tip
such that probe is
perpendicular to
stack axis- or nozzle
is located at a
point of average
velocity with tip
facing opposite of
direction of gas
flow
Set probe temp to
129°C; set filter
temp controller to
121°C allow probe
and filter to heat
for 30 min
Purge train, close
sample valve, open
purge valve, and
start vacuum pump
To begin sampling,
close purge valve
and stop pump; open
sample valve and
sample tank valve
Sampling must be
conducted at a
constant rate of
i 10% over duration
at a rate between
60 and 100 cc/min
Sample collection
ends when total
sampling time is
complete or constant
flow rate can no
longer be maintained
due to reduced
sample tank volume
Frequency and method
of measurement
Prior to sampling
Prior to purging the
train; confirm using
thermocouples
Before sample
collection, with
sample valve closed
During field test
During field test
During field test
Action of require-
ments are not met
Reposition; check
system for leaks
Adjust heating
system
Repeat purge
Repeat sampling
O
Repeat sampling
If sampling must be
interrupted before
reaching the
minimum sampling
time, see
Subsection 4.3.3,
Step 9
O
-------
Table 4.1 (Continued)
Section No. 3-17.4
Date May 31, 1991
Page 13
Characteristic
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action of require-
ments are not met
Constant rate
sampling
(continued)
After sampling is
completed, close
the flow control
valve; record final
tank vacuum and
temperature, and
barometric pressure;
close sample tank
valve
Conduct cylinder gas
performance audit
during sample
collection phase of
test
Immediately following
sampling
Complete
Collect two audit
sample gas concentra-
tions per test; see
Section 3.1?.8
Complete
Sample recovery
(Continued)
Disconnect sample
sample tank from
sampling system;
record tank pressure
within 1 mm Hg
Disconnect
condensate trap;
seal both ends
tightly
Identify condensate
trap and sample
tanks by their test
run number and
sampling location
and enter corres-
ponding information
on field data form
Pack trap samples
in dry ice during
storage and
shipping
Label clean sample
tank and condensate
as sample blanks
Following sampling
Complete
Following sampling
Following sampling
Complete
Complete
Following sample
recovery
Following sampling
Complete
Complete
-------
Section No. 3-17-
Date May 31, 1991
Page 14
o
Table 4.1 (Continued)
Characteristic
Sample logistics
Acceptance limits
Properly label all
bags , containers ,
etc; record all
data on form such
as Fig. 4.2
Frequency and method
of measurement
Visually check each
sample
Action of require-
ments are not met
Complete the
labeling
O
o
-------
Section No. 3.17-5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 1
5.0 POSTSAMPLING OPERATIONS
The postsampling operations include recovery of the condensible organic
fraction contained in the condensate trap, analysis of the carbon dioxide collected
during condensible organic recovery, and analysis of the noncondensible organic
fraction collected during source sampling in the sample tank. These operations are
performed for the compliance test samples, the blank sample trap/blank sample tank
set, and the audit samples.
Both initial and daily performance checks of the condensible organic recovery
system are performed. Initial performance checks include a carrier gas and
auxiliary oxygen blank test, an oxidation catalyst efficiency check, and a
condensible organic recovery efficiency test. Daily performance checks include a
recovery system leak check, a system background test, and an oxidation catalyst
efficiency check.
Both initial and daily performance checks and calibration of the NMO analyzer
are performed. Initial performance tests include an oxidation catalyst efficiency
check, a reduction catalyst efficiency check, an analyzer response linearity check,
and a chromatography performance check. The initial calibration is derived from
the analyzer linearity check data. Daily calibration of both the C02 response and
NMO response is performed. Figure 5-18 at the end of this section provides a
checklist for monitoring the postsampling operations. Table 5.1 at the end of the
section summarizes the quality assurance activities associated with the
postsampling operations.
5.1 Initial Performance Tests
Initial performance tests of both the condensible organic recovery system and
the NMO analyzer are performed before the systems are first placed into operation,
after any shutdown of longer than six months, or after any major modification of
the systems. ...
5.1.1 NMO Analyzer (see Figure 5.1)
Oxidation Catalyst Efficiency Test - With both catalysts unheated, perform
triplicate analyses of the high level methane standard (nominal 1 percent CHA in
air). With the oxidation catalyst heated only to its operating temperature,
reanalyze the high level methane standard in triplicate. Record data on a data
sheet (Figure 5-2) and calculate the oxidation catalyst efficiency using the
equation shown the figure. The average response with the oxidation catalyst heated
should be less than 1 percent of the average response obtained with both catalysts
unheated. If not, replace the oxidation catalyst.
Reduction Catalyst Efficiency Test - With the oxidation catalyst unheated and
the reduction catalyst heated to its operating temperature, analyze the high level
methane standard in triplicate. Repeat the analysis in triplicate with both
catalysts heated to their operating temperatures. Record data on a data sheet
(Figure 5-2) and calculate the reduction catalyst efficiency using the equation
shown the figure. The responses observed under these two conditions should agree
within 5 percent. If not, replace the reduction catalyst.
NMO Response Linearity Test and Initial Calibration - With both catalysts at
their operating temperatures, perform triplicate injections of each of the propane
-------
Section No. 3-17-5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 2
o
COLUMN OVEN
GC COLUMN
cgogggggoooooqcqcaxxjciD.
VALVE OVEN
Ho CARRIER
GAS
OXIDATION
CATALYST
Figure 5-l« Nonmethane organic analyzer.
O
-------
Section No. 3.17-5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 3
NMO Analyzer Catalyst Efficiency Testing
Date
Analyst
Oxidation Catalyst
Temp. , °C
\ '. v.
Reduction Catalyst
Temp., °C
FID Response
Run 1
Run 2
i .
Run 3
;• •
Average
t '
•<•- • , '• .
Oxidation Catalyst Efficiency =
Rl -
x 100 (criteria is 99# or greater)
where: Rj = Average FID response with both catalysts unheated.
R2 = Average FID response with oxidation catalyst only heated.
Reduction Catalyst Efficiency =
R,
x 100 (criteria is 95% or greater)
where: R3 = Average FID response with reduction catalyst only heated.
R4 = Average FID response with both catalysts heated.
Figure 5.2. Analytical data form for NMO analyzer catalyst efficiency.
-------
Section No. 3-17-5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 4
o
standards specified in Subsection 1.3.5 (i.e., 20 ppm, 200 ppm, and 3tOOO ppm in
air nominal). Convert certified concentrations in ppm to ppm C by multiplying ppm
concentrations by 3. Record these concentrations on a data sheet, such as shown
in Figure 5.3, along with the area responses observed in each injection. Calculate
the mean response factor as ppm C/mean area for each standard and the overall mean
response factor for all three standards. The NMO response linearity is acceptable
if the average response factor of each calibration gas standard is within 2.5
percent of the overall mean response factor and if the relative standard deviation
for each set of triplicate injections is less than 2 percent. If these criteria
are not met, check the air and hydrogen flows for the FID to confirm that they are
set according to manufacturer's specifications. Make adjustments if necessary and
repeat the test. The overall mean response factor is used as the initial NMO
calibration response factor (RFNMO).
C02 Response Linearity Test and Initial Calibration - Perform the linearity
test as described above, except use the C02 calibration standards specified in
Subsection 1.3-5 (50 ppm, 500 ppm, and 1 percent in air). The overall mean
response factor is used as the initial C02 calibration response factor (RFC02).
The C02 calibration response factor (RFC02) should be within 10 percent of the NMO
calibration factor (RFNMO). If not, repeat the oxidation catalyst efficiency test.
NMO Analyzer Performance Test - After calibration of the NMO response as
described above, analyze each of the test gas mixtures specified in Subsecti/ "\
1.3.5 in triplicate. (Standard 1 is nominally 50 ppm CO, 50 ppm CHA , 2 percertv_X
C02, and 20 ppm propane in air; Standard 2 is 50 ppm hexane in air; Standard 3 is
nominally 20 ppm toluene in air; and Standard 4 is 100 ppm methanol in air.)
Record the NMO area responses for each test gas on a data sheet such as shown in
Figure 5.4. Convert the certified organic compound concentrations of the test gas
mixtures to ppm C by multiplying by the carbon number of the compound (3 for
propane, 6 for hexane, and 7 f°r toluene). Record these concentrations on the data
sheet as the expected concentrations. Calculate the mean NMO concentration of the
test gas using the equation shown in Figure 5.4. The analyzer performance is
acceptable if the average measured NMO concentration for each mixture is within 5
percent of the expected value.
5.1.2 Condensible Organic "Recovery System
Carrier Gas and Auxiliary Oxygen Blank Check - Each new tank of zero grade
air and zero grade oxygen is analyzed with the NMO analyzer according to the
procedure described in Subsection 5.4.2. The total concentration from any
measured methane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, or nonmethane organics should be
less than 5 parts-per-million carbon (ppm C). Record data on a data sheet such as
shown in Figure 5•5•
Oxidation Catalyst Efficiency Test - Perform this test using the equipment
shown in Figure 5-6 and the following procedure:
1. Install a clean sample trap in the recovery system.
2. Replace the zero air carrier gas with the high level methane S8?-*\
standard (1 percent methane in air nominal concentration). ( )
3. Set the 4-port valve to the trap recovery position and the sampTb /
recovery valve to the vent position. Establish a 100 cm3/minute flow of
the methane in air standard.
4. Attach an intermediate collection vessel (ICV) to the recovery system.
-------
Section No. 3.17-5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 5
NMO Analyzer Linearity Testing
Date
Analyst
Compound
Propane
Propane
Propane
C02
C02
C02
Cone . ,
ppm C
FID Area Response
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Mean
RSD
HP.
ppm C/Area
Overall
Mean RF
Percent
Difference
RF - Overall Mean RF
Percent Difference
x 100
Overall Mean RF
RSD =
100
••••—•••I
R
n - 1
where: R
Ri
n
Mean RID response.
FID response for run i,
Number of runs.
Mean RF =
Standard Cone, (ppm C)
Mean Area Response (R)
Overall Mean RF =
(RFNMO or RFC02)
RF2 + RF3
Figure 5.3. Analytical data form for NMO analyzer linearity tests.
-------
Section No. 3.17-5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 6
NMO Analyzer Performance Testing
o
Date
Analyst
Test Gas
Propane Mix
Hexane
Toluene
Methanol
NMO Area Response
Run 1
Run 2
--•*
Run 3
Mean
RFNMO •
ppm C/Area
Mean Cone . ,
ppm C
Expected
Cone. , ppm C
Percent
Diff.
Mean Cone. = Mean NMO Area x RF,
NMO
Percent Difference = Mean Cone. - Expected Cone.
Expected Cone.
O
Figure
Analytical data form for NMO analyzer performance test.
O
-------
Section No. 3-17-5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 7
Analysis of Recovery System Carrier Gases
Date
Analyst
Cylinder No.
Peak Area
CO C02 NMO
RF
fir,
NMO
Concentration, ppm C
CH4 CO C02 NMO
Concentration, ppm C = RFNMO x Peak Area
Total,
ppm C
Figure 5.5- Analytical data form for analysis of recovery system carrier gases.
-------
Section No. 3-17-5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 8
o
FLOW METERS
\
HEAT TRACE (100'C).
SAMPLE
RECOVERY
VALVE
FLOW
CONTROL
VALVE
SYRINGE PORT
O
VACUUM PUMP
Figure 5.6.
Condensible organic recovery system oxidation catalyst efficiency test.O
-------
7.
8.
Section No. 3.17-5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 9
With the flow control and ICV valves fully open, open the vacuum valve
to evacuate the manometer or gauge, connecting tubing, and the ICV to 10
mm Hg absolute pressure or less. Close the vacuum valve and flow
control valve.
Once the NDIR analyzer response is stable, switch the sample recovery
valve to the collect position. When the manometer or gauge begins to
indicate pressure above atmospheric, open the flow control valve to
maintain atmospheric pressure in the system. After fully opening the
flow control valve, continue pressurizing the ICV to a nominal gauge
pressure of 300 mm Hg (1060 mm Hg absolute).
Switch the sample recovery valve back to the vent position.
Close the ICV valve and detach the ICV from the system. Replace the
methane standard with the zero air carrier gas.
Analyze the C02 concentration in the ICV using the NMO analyzer. The
C02 concentration should be within 2 percent of the methane standard
concentration. Record data on a from such as that shown in Figure 5*7-
If the test criteria cannot be met, repack the oxidation catalyst tube
with new material as described in Subsection 1.2.1.
Condenstble Organic Recovery Efficiency Test - This test is performed
the equipment shown in Figure 5«8 and the following recommended procedure:
using
the
the
liquid sample injection unit in
end with the tee to the tubing
place of a sample
terminated at the
trap.
-port
to nominal
sample
5-
6.
8.
10.
11
12
is 100 i
each set
recovery
Install
Connect
valve.
Set the zero air carrier gas and auxiliary oxygen flows
levels of 100 cm3/minute and 150 cm3/minute, respectively.
Set the 4-port valve to the trap recovery position and the
recovery valve to the vent position.
Attach an intermediate collection vessel to the recovery system.
Evacuate the ICV, manometer or gauge, and connecting tubing to 10 mm Hg
absolute pressure or less. Close the vacuum and flow control valves.
Switch the sample recovery valve to the collect position.
Inject 50 microliters of hexane into the septum port of the liquid
sample injection unit.
Continue recovery of the injected organic as described in Subsection
5.3-2.
Record the final ICV volume and ICV pressure on a form such as that
shown in Figure 5-9 and detach the ICV from the recovery system.
Determine the C02 concentration of the ICV by analysis using the NMO
analyzer and record on a form such as that in Figure 5-9.
Calculate the percent recovery using the equation on a form such as that
shown in Figure 5.9.
Repeat the recovery test two additional times with 50 ul hexane
injections.
Perform additional recovery tests in triplicate with 10 ul hexane, 50 ul
decane, and 10 ul decane each.
The recovery system performance is acceptable if the average percent recovery
10 percent with a relative standard deviation of less than 5 percent for
of triplicate analyses. If these requirements are not met, check the
system for leaks and ensure adequate heating of the liquid sample
injection unit during recovery.
-------
Section No. 3.17.5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 10
Recovery System Oxidation Catalyst Testing
o
Date
Analyst
C02 Area Response
of ICV
i.
RFC02
ppm/area
C02 Cone . ,
ppm
Cfy Std.
Cone. , ppm
Percent
Difference
O
Percent Difference
°°?
Std> C°nC> X 10°
CHj| Std. Cone.
C02 Cone. = C02 Area Response x RFC02
Figure 5.7. Analytical data form for recovery system oxidation catalyst testing.
O
-------
Section No. 3.17-5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 11
FLOW METERS
\
HEAT TRACE (100°C)
AIR
LIQUID
SAMPLE
INJECTION
IMF—-OCtl
SAMPLE
RECOVERY
VALVE
FLOW
CONTROL
VALVE
SYRINGE PORT
CJ
VACUUM PUMP
ICV
CV
VALVE
Figure 5»8. Condensible organic recovery efficiency test.
-------
Condensible Organic Recovery Efficiency Testing
Date
Analyst
Compound
Hexane
Hexane
Hexane
Hexane
Hexane
Hexane
Decane
Decane
Decane
Decane
Decane
Decane
Molecular
Weight,
g/g-mole
86.18
86.18
86.18
86.18
86.18
86.18
142.29
142.29
142.29
142.29
142.29
142.29
Density,
g/ml
0.661
0.661
0.661
0.661
0.661
0.661
0.730
0.730
0.730
0.730
0.730
0.730
Volume
Injected,
uL
10
10
10
50
50
50
10
10
10
50
50
50
Collection Tank Data
Volume, Temp., Pressure,
m3 °K mm Hg
C02 Cone. ,
pprn
% Recovery
'•-
Overall Mean,
% Recovery
RSD
Percent
Percent Recovery = 1.604
(Molecular Weight)(Tank Volume)(Tank Pressure)(CO, Cone.)
(Volume Injected)(Liquid Density)(Tank Temp.)(Carbon Number of Compound Injected)
100
RSD =
n - 1
where: J!R1 = Percent recovery for an individual test.
%Ri = Overall mean percent recovery for a compound and injection volume.
n = Number of tests (3).
Figure 5.9. Analytical data form for recovery efficiency test.
O O
13 O Cfl
ffl P fi>
W rr O
(D 0> cr
^ 3 O
W» 3
"Z,
UO O
00
!-' •
V£> H»
VD-4
l-» •
VJl
O
-------
Section No. 3-17.5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 13
5.2 Daily Performance Tests
5.2.1 Condensible Organic "Recovery System {see Figure 5-10) - Complete three tests
each day before recovery of any samples.
Leak Test - Completely close the zero air and auxiliary oxygen metering valves
and the flow control valve. Install a clean sample trap in the system and switch
the sample recovery valve to the collect position. Open the vacuum valve and
evacuate the system to 10 mm Hg absolute pressure or less. Close the vacuum valve
and record the initial pressure on a data sheet such as shown in Figure 5.H-
After 10 minutes, record the system pressure. The pressure change should be less
than 2 mm Hg over the 10-minute period. If not, locate leakage by an appropriate
method such as pressurizing and checking fittings with water. Repair leaks and
retest as described above.
System Background Test - Set the carrier gas and auxiliary oxygen flows to
their normal values of 100 cm3/minute and 150 cm3/minute, respectively. Switch the
4-port valve to the trap recovery position and the sample recovery valve to the
vent position. Use a 10 cm3 syringe to withdraw a sample from the syringe port
located upstream of the NDIR analyzer. Flush the gas sampling loop on the NMO
analyzer with the syringe sample and then switch the sampling valve to inject.
Record the C02 peak area on a data sheet such as shown in Figure 5-12 and calculate
the C02 concentration. The system background is acceptable if the C02
concentration measured is less than 10 ppm. If the background concentration is
greater than 10 ppm, purge the recovery system with carrier gas and heat the trap
connecting tubing to remove residual organics, then repeat the background test.
Oxidation Catalyst Efficiency Test - Conduct this test as described in
Subsection 5-1•!• If the test criteria cannot be met, replace the oxidation
catalyst and retest.
5.2.2 NMO Analyzer Daily Calibration
C02 Response Calibration - Analyze the highest level (\%) C02 calibration
standard three times. Record the C02 peak areas on a data sheet such as that shown
in Figure 5.13 and calculate the average daily response factor (DRFC02). The
average daily response factor (DRFC02) should be within 5 percent of the initial
C02 calibration response factor (RFC02). If not, repeat the initial performance
test as described in Subsection 5.1.2 to establish a new RFC02. The daily response
factor is used to quantitate the C02 concentrations of the ICV samples.
NMO Response Calibration - Analyze the gas mixture containing nominal
concentrations of 50 ppm CO, 50 ppm CHA, 2 percent C02, and 20 ppm propane in air
in triplicate. Record the NMO peak areas on a data sheet such as that shown in
Figure 5'13 and calculate the average daily response factor (DRFNMO). The average
daily NMO response factor (DRFNMO) should be within 5 percent of the initial NMO
response factor (RFNMO). If not, repeat the initial performance test as described
in Subsection 5«1«2 to establish a new RFNMO. The daily response factor is used to
quantitate the NMO concentration of the sample tanks.
-------
Section No. 3.17.5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 14
o
FLOW METERS
HEAT TRACE (100°C).
SAMPLE
RECOVERY
VALVE
aow
CONTROL
VALVE
SYRINGE PORT
O
VACUl/M PUMP
Figure 5.10. Condensate recovery system.
O
-------
Section No. 3.17-5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 15
Condensate Recovery System Leak Testing
Date
Analyst
Initial
Time
Initial Press.,
Torr
Final Time
Final Press.,
Torr
Figure 5.11. Analytical data form for recovery system leak test.
-------
Section No. 3.17-5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 16
Condensate Recovery System Background Testing
Date
Analyst
RFC02 •
ppm/Area
C02 Peak Area
CO, Cone., ppm
o
o
C02 cone., ppm = CO- Peak Area x RF,
C02
Figure 5.12. Analytical data form for recovery system background test.
O
-------
Section No. 3.17.5
Date Hay 31, 1991
Page 17
Daily NMO Analyzer Calibration
Date
Analyst
NMO Calibration Cylinder No.
CO, Calibration Cylinder No.
Compound
Cone . ,
ppm C
FID Area Response
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Mean
DRF,
ppm C/Area
Initial
RF
Percent
Diff.
Percent Difference = DRF " Initial RFx 100
Initial RF
R
Mean Area Response =
where: RA = FID area response.
Concentration
DRF =
Mean Area Concentration
Figure 5-13. Analytical data form for daily calibration of NMO analyzer.
-------
Section No. 3-17.5
Date May 31. 1991
Page 18
5.3 Condensible Organic Fraction Recovery
o
Recovery of condensible organics is accomplished in two steps. First, the
condensate trap is purged of carbon dioxide while cooling the trap in dry ice.
Second, the condensible organics are volatilized and converted catalytically to
carbon dioxide which is collected in an intermediate collection vessel (ICV) for
analysis.
5.3.1 Trap Purge and Sample Tank Pressurizatton - The following procedure is used
to purge carbon dioxide from the condensate trap and to pressurize the sample tank
(see Figure 5.1*0:
1. Obtain the sample tank and condensate trap from the source test run to be
analyzed (or the blank' sample tank and blank condenste trap).
2. Set the zero air carrier gas to a flow rate of 100 cm3/minute and the
auxiliary oxygen flow to zero.
3. Switch the *J-port valve to the C02 purge position.
4. Attach the sample tank to the condensate trap recovery system.
5. With the sample recovery valve in the vent position and the flow control
valve fully open, evacuate the manometer or gauge to the expected pressure of
the sample tank.
6. Close the vacuum valve, open the sample tank valve, and record the sample
tank pressure (Pt) in mm Hg absolute on a data sheet such as that shown in
Figure 5.15.
7. Immerse the condensate trap in crushed dry ice and attach to the recovery^—^
system with the trap outlet connected to the tube terminating at the k-port( j
valve. V /
8. Switch the sample recovery valve from vent to collect. Adjust the flow
control valve to maintain approximately atmospheric pressure in the recovery
system.
9. After the NDIR analyzer responds to the C02 purged from the trap and the
response reaches a minimum level, withdraw a 10 cm3 syringe sample from the
syringe port and analyze with the NMO analyzer. Repeat analyses until the
C02 concentration of the trap effluent is less than 5 ppm. The length of
time required to purge the trap of residual C02 will depend upon the internal
volumes of the condensate trap recovery system. A larger volume system will
require more purging time at the specified flow rates to meet the effluent
concentration criteria of less than 5 ppm.
10. Switch the carrier gas bypass valve to pressurize the sample tank to
approximately 1060 mm Hg absolute pressure. Switch the sample recovery valve
to the vent position and record the final sample tank pressure (Ptf) on the
data sheet. Detach the sample tank from the system.
5-3'2 "Recovery of Condensible Organics - The following procedure is used to purge
organics from the sample trap, convert them to carbon dioxide, and collect the
carbon dioxide in an intermediate collection vessel (see Figure 5.16).
1. Attach an ICV to the trap recovery system. Open the flow control and ICV
values fully and evacuate the manometer or gauge, connecting tube, and ICV to
10 mm Hg absolute pressure or less. Close the flow control and vacuum
valves.
2. Set the auxiliary oxygen flow to a rate of 150 cm3/minute. /"""N
3. Switch the 4-port valve to the trap recovery position and the sample ( J
recovery valve to the collect position. After the system reaches ^—
atmospheric pressure, adjust the flow control valve to maintain atmospheric
pressure within 10 percent.
-------
Section No. 3.17.5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 19
FLOW METERS
\
HEAT TRACE (100°C)
SAMPLE
RECOVERY
VALVE
FLOW
CONTROL
VALVE
SYRINGE PORT
VACUUM PUMP
SAMPLE
TANK
Figure 5.14. Condensate recovery system, CO purge.
-------
Section No. 3.17-5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 20
Date
Location
Run No.
Analyst
Plant _
Date Sampled
o
Trap No.
Sample Tank No.
ICV No.
ICV volume, m3 (Vv)
Sample tank pressure after sampling, mm Hg (Pt)
Sample tank pressure after pressurizing, mm Hg {Ptf)
ICV final pressure, mm Hg (Pf)
ICV volume, m3 (Vv)
Sample tank temperature after pressurizing, °K (Ttf)
ICV final temperature, °K (Tf) ,
Sample tank temperature at end of sampling, °K (tt)
Sample tank temperature before sampling, °K (Tti)
Sample tank pressure before sampling, mm Hg (Ptl)
Gas volume sampled, dsm3 (Vg)
Run
No.
1
2
3
Mean
ICV Analysis
C02 Area
C02 Cone . ,
PPm (Ccnl)
NMO Area
NMO Cone . ,
ppm C (Ccm2)
,
Sample Tank Analysis
NMO Area
NMO Cone . ,
PPm c (ctm)
o
C02 Cone. = C02 Area x
NMO Cone. = NMO Area x DRFMMn
ri jn u
rtf
T
Atf
Noncondensible Organic = -= =—
Concentration, ppm C (Ct) _J_ t^
IT—x ct»
V P
vv rf
x <% + Ccm2 )
Condensible Organic = 0.3857
Concentration, ppm C (Cc)
TGNMO Concentration, ppm C = Ct - Ctb + Cp - Ccb*
*Note: Blank subtraction must have prior approval of the Administrator.
Figure 5-15- Analytical data form for sample recovery and analysis.
O
-------
Section No. 3.17-5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 21
FLOW METERS
HEAT TRACE (100°C).
SAMPLE
RECOVERY
VALVE
FLOW
CONTROL
VALVE
SYRINGE PORT
VACUUM PUMP
Figure 5*16. Condensate recovery system, collection of trap organics,
-------
o
Section No. 3-17.5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 22
4. Remove the condensate trap from the dry ice and allow ambient air warming of
the trap while monitoring the NDIR analyzer response. The auxiliary oxygen
flow may be discontinued after five minutes if the C02 response is below
10,000 ppm (1%).
5. Heat the trap by placing it in a furnace at 200° C. If the NDIR response
exceeds 50,000 ppm (5#) during recovery, resume auxiliary oxygen flow at a
rate of 150 cm3/minute.
6. After the NDIR analyzer indicates a C02 concentration of less than 10,000
ppm, begin heating the tubing connecting the condensate trap to the
oxidation catalyst with a heat gun. Heat the tubing slowly along the entire
length from the trap 'to tfhe catalyst, and repeat two additional times.
7. Continue trap heating and purging until the C02 concentration is below 10
ppm (determined by analyzing syringe samples collected before NDIR analyzer
with the NMO analyzer).
8. When recovery is complete, switch the carrier gas bypass to pressurize the
ICV to approximately 1060 mm Hg. Switch the sample recovery valve to vent
and record the ICV final pressure (Pf) on a data sheet such as that shown in
Figure 5-15.
5-4 Analysis
The total source concentration of gaseous nonmethane organics is determined by
combining the noncondensible and condensible concentrations. The noncondensible
concentration is determined by analyzing the sample tank for nonmethane organics,
and the condensible concentration is determined by analyzing the intermediate
collection vessel for C02.
5.4.1 NMO Analyser Operating Conditions - Set the helium carrier gas flow rate to
30 cm3/minute. Set the oxidation catalyst oxygen flow rate to 2.2 cm3/minute.
Heat the column oven to an initial temperature of 85°C.
5.^.2 Intermediate Collection Vessel Analysts - Analyze the ICV contents as
follows:
1. Attach the ICV to the 10-port gas sampling valve.
2. Purge the sample loop with gas from the ICV and then switch the 10-port valve
to the inject position.
3. When the detector response returns to near baseline following the C02 peak,
switch the 10-port valve to the backflush position and increase the column
oven temperature to 195°C as rapidly as possible.
4. After detection of any nonmethane organic compounds, return the column oven
temperature to 85°C.
5. Record the C02 peak area and NMO peak area on the data sheet shown in Figure
5.15-
6. Repeat the analysis two additional times.
7. Calculate C02 and NMO concentrations using equations given in Figure 5.15.
8. Calculate the average C02 concentration (Cc(nl) and the average NMO
concentration (Ccin2) in the ICV and record on the data sheet.
5.4.3 Sample Tank Analysis - Analyze the sample tank as described in Section
5.4.2. Record the NMO peak area only and calculate the average NMO concentration f-^.
(Ctra) of the sample tank. f j
o
-------
Section No. 3-17-5
Date May 31. 1991
Page 23
5.4.4 Condensible Organic Blank Analysis -
1. Analyze the ICV resulting from the blank trap recovery as described in
Section 5.4.2.
2. Calculate C02 and NMO concentrations using equations given in Figure
5.16.
3. Calculate the average C02 concentration (Ccnl) and the average NMO
concentration (Ccm2) in the blank ICV and record on the data sheet.
4. Calculate the source condensible organic blank concentration (Ccb) using
the equation in Figure 5-17- The condensible organic blank concentration
may not exceed 15 ppmC. If the blank value exceeds 15 ppmC, then the
value of 15 ppmC may be used as the blank value. NOTE: The method does
not provide for blank correction. However, with prior approval of the
Administrator, blank correction (subtracting the blank value) may be
used.
5-4.5 Noncondensible Organic Blank Analysis - Analyze the blank sample tank as
described in Section 5-4.2. Record the NMO peak area only and calculate the
average NMO concentration (Ctmb)of the blank sample tank. Calculate the source
noncondensible organic blank concentration (Ctb) using the equation shown in
Figure 5-17- The noncondensible organic blank concentration may not exceed 5
ppmC. If the blank value exceeds 5 ppmC, then the value of 5 PpmC may be used as
the blank value. NOTE: The method does not provide for blank correction.
However, with prior approval of the Administrator, blank correction (subtracting
the blank value) may be used.
5.4.6 Source Concentration Calculations - Calculate the noncondensible organic
concentration (Ct), the condensible organic concentration (Cc), and the TGNMO
concentration using the data and equations shown Figures 5.15 and 5.17 (blank
subtraction requires prior approval of Adminstrator).
-------
Section No. 3-17-5
Date Hay 31, 1991
Page 24
Date
Location
Blank No.
Sample Tank No.
Analyst
Plant _
Date Sampled
o
Trap No.
ICV No.
ICV volume, o3 (Vv)
Sample tank pressure after sampling, nun Hg (Pt)
Sample tank pressure after pressurizing, mm Hg (Pt t)
ICV final pressure, mm Hg (Pf)
ICV volume, ra3 (Vv)
Sample tank temperature after'ipressurizing, °K (Ttf)
ICV final temperature, °K (Tfj
Sample tank temperature at end of sampling, °K (Tt)
Sample tank temperature before sampling, °K (Ttl)
Sample tank pressure before sampling, mm Hg (Ptl)
Gas volume sampled, dsm3 (VB)
Blank
No.
1
2
3
Mean
ICV Analysis
C02 Area
C02 Cone . ,
PPm (Ccml)
NMO Area
NMO Cone . ,
PPm c
-------
Section No. 3.17-5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 25
Date Plant Name Sampling Location
Initial Performance Tests of Condensible Organic Recovery System
Do zero grade air and zero grade oxygen carrier gases contain less than 5 Ppm C
total of methane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and nonmethane organics?
yes no. (If no, replace gases or filter to remove impurities.)
Does the C02 concentration in the ICV collected during the oxidation catalyst
efficiency test agree within 2 percent of the methane standard concentration?
yes no. (If no, replace the oxidation catalyst.)
Is recovery efficiency 100 +_ 10 percent with a relative standard deviation of less
than 5 percent for each set of triplicate injections of hexane and decane at
10 ul and 50 ul? yes no. (If no, check the recovery system for
leaks and assure adequate heating of the liquid sample injection unit.)
Initial Performance Tests of NMO Analyzer
Does the oxidation catalyst efficiency test show an efficiency of 99 percent or
better? yes no. (If no, replace the oxidation catalyst.)
Does the reduction catalyst efficiency test show an efficiency of 95 percent or
better? yes no. (If no, replace the reduction catalyst.)
Is the NMO response linear? (Average response factor of each calibration standard
within 2.5 percent of the overall mean and a relative standard deviation for
each set of triplicate injections of less than 2 percent.) yes no.
(If no, check FID air and hydrogen flows and make adjustments.)
Is the C02 response linear? (Average response factor of each calibration standard
within 2.5 percent of the overall mean and a relative standard deviation for
each set of triplicate injections of less than 2 percent). yes no.
(If no, check FID air and hydrogen flows and make adjustments.)
Are the measured concentrations of the analyzer performance test gases within 5
percent of their certified concentrations? yes no. (If no, replace
the GC column or adjust column backflush timing and/or temperature to obtain
acceptable performance.)
Daily Performance Tests of Condensible Organic Recovery System
Leak test completed? yes no. (Leak test following procedure in Sub-
section 5.2.1.)
System background test completed? yes no. (Follow procedure in Sub-
section 5.2.1.)
Oxidation catalyst efficiency test completed? yes no. (Follow procedure
in Subsection 5.2.1.)
Daily Calibration of NMO Analyzer
Calibration of C02 response completed with 1% C02 in air standard?
yes no.
Calibration of NMO response completed with mixed gas standard containing 50 ppm
CO, 50 ppm CH4, 2 percent C02, and 20 ppm propane in air? yes no.
Figure 5.18. Postsampling operations checklist.
(Continued)
-------
Section No. 3.17-5
Date Hay 31, 1991
Page 26
Figure 5.18. (Continued)
Condensible Organic Recovery
Condensate trap purged and sample tank pressurized? yes no. (Follow
procedure in Subsection 5 • 3 • 1 •)
Condensible organics purged from sample trap, converted to C02, and collected in
an ICV? yes no. (Follow procedure in Subsection 5-3-2.)
Analysis of Sample Tank and Intermediate Collection Vessel
j . .,^ . ;
NMO analyzer operating conditions set? yes no. See Subsection,5-4.1..)
ICV analyzed in triplicate? yes no. (Follow procedure in Subsection
5.4.2.)
Sample tank analyzed in triplicate? yes no. (Follow procedure in
Subsection 5.4.3.)
Source concentration calculated? yes no. (Use equations shown in
Figure 5.1.5.)
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.17.5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 27
Table 5.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Characteristic
Carrier gas and
auxiliary 02 used
in condensible
organic recovery
system
Recovery system
oxidation catalyst
efficiency
Acceptance
limits
Total concentration
from CH4, CO, C02,
and NMO must be
<5 ppm C
C02 concentration
of collected sample
must be +. 2% of CHA
test gas concentra-
tion
Frequency and method
of measurement
Analyze each new
cylinder with the NMO
analyzer
Before first operation
after any shutdown of
longer than 6 months,
after modification, or
daily when samples are
analyzed; test by re-
placing carrier gas
with 1% din in air,
collection of sample
in ICV, and analysis
with NMO analyzer
Action if
requirements
are not met
Obtain better
grades of gas
from vendor or
filter gases to
reduce impurities
Replace oxida-
tion catalyst
Condensible organ-
ic recovery
efficiency
Average recovery of
100 + 102 with a RSD
of <5# for each set
of triplicate analy-
ses
Before first operation
after any shutdown of
longer than 6 months,
or after modification;
test with 10 and 50 ul
injections of hexane
and decane into liquid
sample injection unit
and analysis of col-
lected sample with
NMO analyzer
Check recovery
system for leaks
and assure
adequate heating
of liquid sample
injection unit
during recovery
NMO analyzer oxi-
dation catalyst
efficiency
FID response with
oxidation catalyst
heated must be <1%
of response with
both catalysts un-
heated
Before first operation
after any shutdown of
longer than 6 months,
or after modification;
analyze 1% CHA in air
with both catalysts
unheated and then with
oxidation catalyst
only heated
Replace
oxidation
catalyst
(Continued)
-------
Table 5.1 (Continued)
Section No. 3.17.5
Date May 31. 1991
Page 28
o
Characteristic
Acceptance
Limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
NMO analyzer
reduction
catalyst
efficiency
Analyzer response
to 1% methane in air
standard with both
catalysts heated
should agree +_ 5% of
response, with re-
duction catalyst
only heated
Before first operation
after any shutdown of
more than 6 months, or
after modification; a
1% CH4 in air standard
is analyzed with both
catalysts heated and
with the reduction
catalyst only heated
Replace
reduction
catalyst
NMO response lin-
earity and cali-
bration
Response factor of
each calibration
gas standard must be
+2.5% of overall
mean response factor
and relative stan-
dard deviation of
each set of trip-
licate analyses
must be <2%
Before first operation
after any shutdown of
longer than 6 months,
or after modification;
analyze propane in air
standards with NMO
analyzer under normal
operating conditions
Check air and
hydrogen flows
for FID to con-
firm that they
are set accord-
ing to manufac-
turer's speci-
fications ; make
adjustments if
necessary and
and repeat test
O
C02 response
linearity and
calibration
Response, factor of
each calibration
gas standard must
be +2.5% of overall
mean response factor
and relative stan-
dard deviation of
each set of tripli-
cate analyses must
be < 2%
Before first operation
after any shutdown of
longer than 6 months,
or after modification;
analyze the C02 stan-
dards with NMO analy-
zer under normal oper-
ating conditions
Check air and
hydrogen flows
for FID to con-
firm they are
set according
to manufacturer's
specifications;
make adjustments
if necessary and
repeat test
NMO analyzer
performance
Average concentra-
tion based on trip-
licate analysis
must be within 5%
of expected value
for each test
mixture
Before first operation
after any shutdown of
longer than 6 months,
or after modification;
analyze test mixtures
with NMO anlayzer
under normal operating
conditions
Replace GC
column or
adjust column
backflush timing
and/or tempera-
ture to obtain
acceptable
performance
(continued)
O
-------
TABLE 5.1 (continued)
Section No. 3-17-5
Date May 31, 1991
Page 29
Characteristic
Condensible
organic recovery
system leak test
Recovery system
background test
Acceptance
Limits
System should lose
<2 mm Hg vacuum
over a 10-min period
The measured C02
background concen-
tration must be <10
ppm
Frequency and method
of measurement
Daily, before analysis
of samples; evacuate
the recovery system
and monitor the vacuum
with mercury manometer
or pressure gauge
Daily, before analysis
of samples; analyze
syringe samples of
.recovery system efflu-
ent with NMO analyzer
Action if
requirements
are not met
Locate leakage
by appropriate
method such as
pressurizing
and checking
fittings with
water; repair
leaks and retest
Purge recovery
system with
carrier gas and
heat trap con-
necting tubing
to remove res-
idual organics,
then retest
C02 response
calibration
The average response
factor from tripli-
cate analysis of
highest concentra-
tion standard must
be +$% of initial
C02 response factor
Before and after anal-
ysis of each set of
samples or daily,
whichever occurs
first, analyze high-
est level C02 standard
with NMO analyzer
under normal operating
conditions
Repeat analyzer
catalyst effic-
iency tests,
linearity tests,
and performance
test
NMO response
calibration
Average NMO response
factor should be +
of initial NMO
response factor
Before and after anal
ysis of each set of
samples or daily,
whichever occurs
first, analyze gas
mixture containing
50 ppm CO, 50 ppm CH4,
2% C02, and 20 ppm
propane in air
Repeat analyzer
catalyst effic-
iency tests,
linearity tests,
and performance
test
Sample trap
purge and
sample tank
pressurization
(Continued)
C02 concentration of
syringe port samples
must be less than
5
Analyze syringe port
samples with NMO
analyzer after NDIR
analyzer response
returns to baseline
Continue purg-
ing trap with
carrier gas and
analyze addi-
tional syringe
port samples
-------
Section No. 3.17.5
Date May 31. 1991
Page 30
TABLE 5.1 (continued)
o
Characteris tic
Acceptance
Limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Condensible
organics recovery
C02 concentration of
syringe port samples
must be <10 ppm
Analyze syringe port
samples with NMO anal-
yzer when NDIR anal-
yzer response returns
to baseline
Continue heating
of sample trap
and purging with
carrier gas
Intermediate
collection vessel
analysis
Relative standard
deviation from trip-
licate analysis for
C0 and NMO must be
Analyze ICV after trap
recovery by injecting
aliquots on NMO
analyzer
Perform addi-
tional analyses
until RSD of
last three
injections
is <2%
Sample tank
analysis
Relative standard
deviation from
triplicate analysis
for NMO must be <2%
Analyze sample tank
after trap purging and
tank pressurization by
injecting aliquots on
NMO analyzer
Perform addi-
tional analyses
until RSD of
last three
injections is
O
O
-------
Section No. 3.17.6
Date May 31, 1991
Page 1
6.0 CALCULATIONS
Calculation errors due to procedural or mathematical mistakes can be a part of
total system error. Therefore, it is recommended that each set of calculations be
repeated or spotchecked, preferably by a team member other than the one who per-
formed the original calculations. If a difference greater than typical round-off
error is detected, the calculations should be checked step-by-step until the source
of error is found and corrected.
Calculations should be carried out to at least one extra decimal figure beyond
that of the acquired data and should be rounded off after final calculation to two
significant digits for each run or sample. All rounding of numbers should be
performed in accordance with the ASTM 380-76 procedures. All calculations should
then be recorded on a calculation form such as Figure 6.1.
A computer program is advantageous in reducing calculation errors. If a
computer program is used, the original data entered should be included in the
printout so it can be reviewed; if differences are observed, a new computer run
should be made. A computer program is also useful in maintaining a standardized
format for reporting of results. It is highly recommended that a standardized
format including the data shown in Figure 6.2 be used for reporting the emissions
results. The data shown will allow auditing of the calculations.
Table 6.1 at the end of this section summarizes the quality assurance
activities for calculations.
6.1 Nomenclature
The following nomenclature is used in the calculations:
C = TGNMO concentration of the effluent, ppm C equivalent.
Cc = Calculated condensible organic (condensate trap) concentration of the
effluent, ppm C equivalent.
Ccl) = Calculated condensible organic (condensate trap) blank concentration
of the sampling equipment, ppm C equivalent.
C = Measured concentration (NMO analyzer) for the condensate trap ICV, ppm
CO
'2-
C
C
C
C
L. m
NMO.
F = Sampling flow rate, cc/min.
L = Volume of liquid injected, ul.
M = Molecular weight of the liquid injected, g/g-mole.
mc = TGNMO mass concentration of the effluent, mg C/dsm3.
cob= Measured blank concentration (NMO analyzer) for the condensate trap
ICV, ppm C02.
t = Calculated noncondensible organic concentration (sample tank) of the
effluent, ppm C equivalent.
tb = Calculated noncondensible organic blank concentration (sample tank) of
the sampling equipment, ppm C equivalent.
tm = Measured concentration (NMO analyzer) for the sample tank, ppm
NMO.
tm = Measured blank concentration (NMO analyzer) for the sample tank, ppm
-------
Section No. 3.17-6
Date May 31, 1991
Page 2
o
N = Carbon number of the liquid compound injected (N = 12 for decane, N =
6 for hexane).
Pf = Final pressure of the intermediate collection vessel, mm Hg absolute,
Pb = Barometric pressure, cm Hg.
Ptl = Gas sample tank pressure before sampling, mm Hg absolute.
Pt = Gas sample tank pressure after sampling, but before pressurizing, mm
Hg absolute.
Ptf = Final gas sample tank pressure after pressurizing, mm Hg absolute.
Tf = Final temperature of intermediate collection vessel, °K.
Ttl = Sample tank temperature before sampling, °K.
Tt = Sample tank temperature at completion of sampling, °K.
Ttf = Sample tank temperature after pressurizing, °K.
V = Sample tank volume, m3.
Vt = Sample train volume, cc.
Vv = Intermediate collection vessel volume, m3.
VB = Gas volume sampled, dsm3.
n = Number of data points.
q = Total number of analyzer injections of intermediate collection
vessel during analysis (where k = injection number, 1 ... q).
r = Total number of analyzer injections of sample tank during analysis
(where j = injection number, 1 ... r).
XL = Individual measurements.
x = Mean value. x""X
P = Density of liquid injected, g/cc. j }
0 = Leak check period, min. V, /
AP = Allowable pressure change, cm Hg.
6.2 Calculations
The following are the equations used with the example calculation form, Figure
6.1 to calculate the concentration of TGNMO, the allowable limit for the pretest
leak check, and assess the efficiency of the condensate recovery system.
6.2.1 Allowable Pressure Change - Calculate the allowable pressure change, in cm
Hg, for the pretest leak check using the following equation. This value is then
compared to the actual pressure change, in cm Hg, to determine if the train is
suitable for sampling.
Equation 6-1
6.2.2 Sample Volume - For each test run, calculate the gas volume sampled using
the following equation.
Vs = 0.3857 V
p P
rt _ rti
T7 T77
Equation 6-2
6.2.3 Noncondenslble Organtcs Concentration - For each sample tank, determine the
concentration of nonmethane organics, in ppm C, using Equation 6-3.
-------
Section No. 3.17-6
Date May 31, 1991
Page 3
6.2.3 ffoncondensible Organics Concentration - For each sample tank, determine the
concentration of nonmethane organics, in ppm C, using Equation 6-3.
ptr
Ttf
Pt Ptl
Tt Ttl
1 V Cfc
— z_j tm
I* . *
Equation 6-3
6.2.4 Noncondensible Organics Blank Concentration - For blank sample tank,
determine the concentration of nonmethane organics, in ppm C, using Equation 6-3
and the values for Ctnb. The blank value may not exceed 5 PPm. If the blank
value exceeds 5 ppm C, then the value of 5 PPm C may be used as the blank value.
The calculated blank value is C
t b
6.2.5 Condensible Organics Concentration - For each condensate trap, determine the
concentration of organics, in ppm C, using Equation 6-4.
cp = 0.3857
q
i Z
q k=l
cm.
Equation 6-4
6.2.6 Condensible Organics Concentration - For each condensate trap, determine the
concentration of organics, in ppm C, using Equation 6-4 and the values for CCBb.
The blank value may not exceed 15 ppm. If the blank value exceeds 15 ppm C, then
the value of 15 ppm C may be used as the blank value. The calculated blank value
is Ccb.
6.2.7 TGNMO Concentration - To determine the TGNMO concentration for each test
run, use Equation 6-5. NOTE: The method does not provide for blank correction.
The tester must have prior approval of the Administrator to use blank correction
(subtract blank).
= ct - ctb + cc - ccb
Equation 6-5
6.2.8 TGNMO Mass Concentration - To determine the TGNMO mass concentration as
carbon for each test run, use Equation 6-6.
m, = 0.4993 C
Equation 6-6
• }
-------
Section No. 3.17.6
Date May 31. 1991
Page ^
6.2.9 Percent Eecovery - Calculate the percent recovery for the liquid organic
injections used to assess the efficiency of the condensate recovery and
conditioning system using Equation 6-7. The average recovery for triplicate
injections shoul fall within 102 (of 100/0.
Percent Recovery = 1.604 —
L P Tf N Equation 6-7
\ v •
6.2.10 "Relative Standard Deviation - Calculate the relative standard deviation
(RSD) for the percent recoveries for triplicate injections of liquid organics using
Equation 6-8. The RSD should be less than 5% for each set of triplicate analyses.
o
100 /^(Xi - x)2
RSD = ^ I Equation 6-8
~ V n - 1
x »
O
o
-------
Section No. 3.17.6
Date May 31, 1991
Page 5
F
V.
ALLOWABLE PRETEST LEAK CHECK PRESSURE CHANGE
cc/min, Pb = . cm Hg, 0 = . min,
cc
AP = 0.01
= . cm Hg
Equation 6-1
Si i-
I'
1.
V = 0. m3, Ptl
Pti = . mm Hg, Tj =
K vs = 0.3857 V
/
Pt _ pti
Tt Ttl
SAMPLE VOLUME
= . mm Hg,
. °K, Tt
= 0.
dsm3
>K
Equation 6-2
pti "
Ttl
Ctml
NONCONDENSIBLE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION
mm Hg, Pt = mm Hg, Ptf = mm Hg,
°K T - °K T - <
• __ *»• A£ __ __ > *^ > •'•tf °~ — *
. ppm NMO, Ctm2 = . ppm NMO,
. ppm NMO, r =
K,
tf
P P
rt rt
T T
x x
*.
tm
- . ppm C
Equation 6-3
Figure 6.1. Calculation form for Method 25 analysis.
-------
Section No. 3-17.6
Date May 31, 1991
Page 6
o
P'i =
Lti
'tnbl
NONCONDESIBLE ORGANICS BLANK CONCENTRATION
__ mm Hg, Pt = ___ mm Hg, Ptf =
__ . _ °K, Tt = ___ . _ °K , Ttf =
___ . _ ppm NMO, Ctmb2 = ___ . _ ppm NMO,
___ . _ ppm NMO, r = _
mm Hg,
'tb
t t
= . ppm C
Equation 6-3
CONDENSIBLE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION
Vv = 0. m3, V. = 0. dsm3,
Pf = mm Hg, Tf = . °K,
= . ppm C02 , Ccm2 = . ppm C02 ,
O
cm3
= . ppm C02 , q =
Cc = 0.3857
cm,.
Equation 6-4
= . ppm C
Figure 6.1. Continued
O
v --1 - -
-------
Section No. 3-17.6
Date May 31, 1991
Page 7
Vv = 0.
'crabl
CONDENSIBLE ORGANICS BLANK CONCENTRATION
m3, V8 = 0. dsm3,
mm Hg, Tf = . _.°K,
. _ ppm C02 , Ccmb2 = . _ ppm C02
. ppm C02, q =
V.
Crh = 0.3857
'cb
cm
k=l
bk
Equation 6-4
= . ppm C02
TGNMO CONCENTRATION
Ct = . ppm C, Ctb = . ppm C, Cc = . ppm C,
Ccb = . ppm C
c • ct ~ ctb*
cc " ccb = ._ ppm C
C =
Equation 6-5
Note: Blank subtraction requires prior approval of the Adminstrator.
TGNMO MASS CONCENTRATION
. ppm C
mc = 0.4993
. mg C/dsm3
Equation 6-6
Figure 6.1. Continued
-------
Section No. 3.17.6
Date May 31, 1991
Page 8
PERCENT RECOVERY
. g/g-mole, L = . ul,
. mm Hg, Tf = . °K,
Vv = 0. . m3 , p = 0. kg/cc,
Ccm.= . ppm C, N =
o
pf ccm
^ I V J. w III
Percent Recovery = 1.604 — =
Tf N
Equation 6-7
RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION
n =
100
RSD =
n - 1
Equation 6-8
O
Figure 6.1. Continued
O
-------
FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
Plant: XXXXXXXXXX
Sampling Location: XXXXXXXXXX
Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Field Data
Sample Trap I.D.
Sample Tank I.D.
Sample Tank Volume, V (n^)
Actual Volume Sampled, V, (dsm^*)
s
Field Initial Barometric Pressure, Pb (cm Hg)
Field Final Barometric Pressure (cm Hg)
Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Blank Audit 1 Audit 2
xx/xx/xx xx/xx/xx xx/xx/xx xx/xx/xx xx/xx/xx xx/xx/xx
Field Initial Gauge Pressure of Tank,
Field Final Gauge Pressure of Tank
nk, Ptl
. pt U
(mm Hg absolute)
mm Hg absolute)
Field Initial Temperature of Tank, Tt; (
Field Final Temperature of Tank, Tt (*K)
Laboratory Data
Final Tank Pressure, Pfcf (mm Hg absolute)
Final Tank Temperature, Ttf (°K)
Noncondenslble (tank) Portion - Injection #1 (area units)
Noncondensible (tank) Portion - Injection #2 (area units)
Noncondensible (tank) Portion - Injection #3 (area units)
Instrument Blank (area units)
NMO Response Factor (area units/ppm C)
•68°F -- 29.92 in. Hg (760 ran Hg)
T) O C/5
(0 {D 0>
Oq rt O
(D (D ft
(continued)
Figure 6.2. Recommended standard format for reporting Method 25 data and results.
U> O
I-* •
LO
I-' •
MD—J
ON
-------
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Blank
Audit 1
Audit 2
xx/xx/xx xx/xx/xx xx/xx/xx xx/xx/xx xx/xx/xx xx/xx/xx
Laboratory Data (Continued)
Volume of ICV, Vy (n3)
Final ICV Pressure, P- (ran Hg absolute)
Final ICV Temperature. Tf (°K)
Condensible (trap) Portion - Injection fi (area units)
Condensible (trap) Portion - Injection #2 (area units)
Condensible (trap) Portion - Injection #3 (area units)
Instrument Blank (area units)
NMO Response Factor (area units/ppm C)
Results
Measured Concentration for Sample Tank, Ct (ppra NMO)
Measured Concentration for Condensate Trap, C (ppm C)
Noncondensible Organic Concentration (tank), Ct (ppra C)
Condensible Organic Concentration (trap), Cc (ppm C)
Note: Prior approval of Adninstrator required for blank substraction
TGNMO Concentration, C (ppn C)
Flue Gas Flow Rate
Emission Rate (rag/h)
••From EPA Method testing.
Figure 6.2. Continued
*"0 t^ C/J
03 p3 ro
CD fl> ft
VO—J
(-» •
ON
O
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.17.6
Date May 31, 1991
Page 11
Table 6.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR CALCULATION CHECKS
Characteristic
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Analysis data
form
All data and calcu-
tions are shown
Visually check
Complete the
missing data
Calculations
Difference between
check and original
calculations should
not exceed round-off
error
Repeat all calcula-
tions starting with
raw data for hand
calculations; check
all raw data input
for computer calcu-
lations; hand calcu-
late one sample per
test
Indicate errors
on calculation
form, Figure 6.1
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.17-7
Date May 31, 1991
Page 1
7.0 MAINTENANCE
The normal use of emission testing equipment subjects it to corrosive gases,
extremes in temperature, vibration, and shock. Keeping the equipment in good
operating order over an extended period of time requires knowledge of the equipment
and a program of routine maintenance which is performed quarterly or after 2830 L
(100 ft3) of operation, whichever is greater. In addition to the quarterly main-
tenance, a yearly cleaning of pumps and metering systems is recommended. Main-
tenance procedures for the various components are summarized in Table 8.1 at the
end of the section. The following procedures are not required, but are recommended
to increase the reliability of the equipment.
7.1 Pump
Several types of pumps may be used to perform Method 25; the two most common
are the fiber vane pump with in-line oiler and the diaphragm pump. The fiber vane
pump requires a periodic check of the oiler jar. Its contents should be translu-
cent; the oil should be changed if not translucent. Use the oil specified by the
manufacturer. If none is specified, use SAE-10 nondetergent oil. Whenever a fiber
vane pump starts to run erratically or during the yearly disassembly, the head
should be removed and the fiber vanes changed. Erratic operation of a diaphragm
pump is normally due to either a bad diaphragm (causing leakage) or to malfunctions
of the valves, which should be cleaned annually by complete disassembly.
7.2 Rotameter
Rotameters should be disassembled and cleaned according to the manufacturer's
instructions using recommended cleaning fluids every 3 months or upon erratic
operation.
7.3 Manometer
The fluid in the manometers should be changed whenever there is discoloration
or visible matter in the fluid, and during the yearly disassembly.
7.^ Sampling Train
All remaining sampling train components should be visually checked every 3
months and completely disassembled and cleaned or replaced yearly. Many items,
such as quick disconnects, should be replaced whenever damaged rather than checked
periodically. Normally, the best procedure for maintenance in the field is to have
on hand another entire sampling system, including a pump, probe, U-tubes, filter
holders, sample tanks, and heated sample line rather than replacing individual
components. It is recommended that the U-tubes be filled with nitrogen after
burnout to reduce oxidation of the metal surface. The sample tanks should be clean
and dry when being stored between tests.
7.5 Gas Chroroatograph and NDIR
Maintenance activities and schedules for gas chromatographs and NDIRs are make
and model specific. It is recommended that the analyst consult the operator's
manual for instructions relative to maintenance practices and procedures.
-------
Section No. 3-17.7
Date May 31, 1991
Page 2
Table 7.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CHECKS
o
Apparatus
Fiber vane
pump
Diaphragm
pump
Rotameter
Manometer
Sampling
train
components
Gas chroma-
tograph and
NDIR
Acceptance limits
In-line oiler
free of leaks
Leak- free valves
functioning properly
Clean and no errat-
ic behavior
No discoloration or
visible matter in
the fluid
No damage
See owner's manual
Frequency and method
of measurement
Periodically check
oiler jar; remove
head and change fiber
vanes
Clean valves during
yearly disassembly
Clean every 3 mo. or
whenever ball does
not move freely
Check periodically
and during disassem-
bly
Visually check every
3 mo.; completely
disassemble and
clean or replace
yearly
See owner's manual
Action if require-
ments are not met
Replace as
needed
Replace when
leaking or mal-
functioning
Replace
Replace parts
as needed
If failure noted,
replace appro-
priate components
See owner's manual
O
o
-------
Section No. 3-17-8
Date May 31, 1991
Page 1
8.0 AUDITING PROCEDURES
An audit is an independent assessment of data quality. Independence is
achieved if the individual(s) performing the audit and their standards and
equipment are different from the regular field team and their standards and
equipment. Routine quality assurance checks by a field team are necessary to
generate good quality data, but they are not part of the auditing procedure. Table
8.1 at the end of this section summarizes the quality assurance functions for
auditing.
Based on the requirements of Method 25 and the results of collaborative test-
ing of other EPA Test Methods, one performance audit is required when testing for
compliance for Standards of New Source Performance (and as required by other
government agencies) and is recommended when testing for other purposes; and a
second performance audit is recommended. The two performance audits are:
1. An audit of the sampling and analysis of Method 25 is required for NSPS
and recommended for other purposes.
2. An audit of the data processing is recommended.
It is suggested that a systems audit be conducted as specified by the quality
assurance coordinator in addition to these performance audits. The two performance
audits and the systems audit are described in detail in Subsections 8.1 and 8.2,
respectively.
8.1 Performance Audits
Performance audits are conducted to evaluate quantitatively the quality of
data produced by the total measurement system (sample collection, sample analysis,
and data processing). It is required that a cylinder gas performance audit be
performed once during every NSPS test utilizing Method 25 and it is recommended
that a cylinder gas audit be performed once during any enforcement source test
utilizing Method 25 conducted under regulations other than NSPS.
8.1.1 Performance Audit of the Field Test - As stated in Section 4.5 of Method 25
(40 CFR 60, Appendix A) and the "Instructions for the Sampling and Analysis of
Total Gaseous Nonmethane Organics from Quality Assurance Audit Cylinders using EPA
Method 25 Procedures" (supplied with the EPA audit gas cylinders), a set of two
audit samples are to be collected in the field (not laboratory) from two different
concentration gas cylinders at the same time the compliance test samples are being
collected. The two audit samples are then analyzed concurrently and in exactly the
same manner as the compliance samples to evaluate the tester's and analyst's
technique and the instrument calibration. The information required to document the
collection and analysis of the audit samples has been included on the example data
sheets shown later in Figures 8.1 and 8.3- The audit analyses shall agree within
20 percent of the actual cylinder concentrations.
The operator of the affected facility is responsible for informing local,
state, and federal agencies of the test program and of the test schedule.
Therefore, the operator of the affected facility is responsible for requesting (and
handling of) the audit samples from the agency responsible for observing the
compliance test. The tester is responsible for informing his client of the details
of any method used and any audit samples required to validate the compliance test.
These details are usually part of a pretest meeting, but many times pretest
meetings are not necessary depending on the scope of the work and permit
requirements.
-------
Section No. 3.17-8
Date May 31, 1991
Page 2 • x—v
The facility (or tester) may obtain audit cylinders by contacting the agency —
responsible for observing and/or evaluating the compliance test and informing the
agency the time and location of the compliance test. This should be done at least
l5 days prior to the test date. The responsible agency will contact: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Atmospheric Research and Exposure Laboratory,
Quality Assurance Division (MD-77), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 277H
and have the cylinders shipped to the specified site.
Responsibilities of the Audit Supervisor - The primary responsibilities of
the audit supervisor are to ensure that the proper audit gas cylinders are ordered
and safe-guarded, and to interpret the results obtained by the analyst.
When notified by the testing company 'that a test is to be conducted, the audit
supervisor will order the proper cylinders from the EPA's Quality Assurance
Division. Generally the audit cylinders will be shipped (at EPA's expense)
directly to the specified site. However, if the audit supervisor will be on-site
during the compliance test, the audit cylinders may be shipped to the testing
company for transport to the sampling site. Since the audit cylinders are sealed
by EPA, the testing firm will not be allowed to collect any audit gas without
breaking the seal. The audit gas concentration^) should be in the range of 50/»
below to 100% above the applicable standard. If two cylinders are not available,
then one cylinder can be used.
The audit supervisor must ensure that the audit gas cylinder(s) are shipped to
the correct address, and to prevent vandalism, verify that they are stored in a
safe location both before and after the audit. Also, the audit cylinders should
not be analyzed when the pressure drops below 200 psi. The audit1 supervisor then
ensures that the audits are conducted as described below. At the conclusion of the
collection of the audit samples, the cylinders are then returned to shipping
laboratory as per the instructions supplied with the cylinders at the expense of
the facility. If the tester is to transport the audit cylinders to his home
laboratory for shipment back to the EPA/QAD contractor, the audit supervisor will
seal both cylinders to ensure that additional audit sample gas cannot be collected
without breaking the seal.
The audit supervisor must also interpret the audit results. Indication of
acceptable results may be obtained immediately by reporting the audit compliance
test results in ppm by telephone to the responsible enforcement agency. The tester
must also include the results of both audit samples, their identification numbers,
and the analyst's name along with the results of the compliance determination
samples in the appropriate reports to the EPA regional office or the appropriate
enforcement agency during the 30-day period.
When the measured concentration agrees within 20% of the true value, the audit
results are considered acceptable. Failure to meet the 20-percent specification
may require reanalysis of the audit samples and compliance test samples,
reauditing, or retests until the audit problems are resolved. However, if the
audit results do not affect the compliance or noncompliance status of the affected
facility, the Administrator (enforcement agency) may waive the reanalysis, further
audits, or retest requirements and accept the results of the compliance test. For
example, if the audit results average 38.6% low, the compliance results would be
divided by (1 - 0.386) to determine the correlated effect. If the audit results
average 58.3% high, the compliance sample results would be divided by (1 + 0.583)
to determine the effect. When the compliance status of the source is the same with
and without the correlated value, then the responsible agency may accept the
results of the test. While steps are being taken to resolve audit analysis
problems, the Administrator may also choose to use the data to determine the
o
o
-------
Section No. 3-17.8
Date May 31, 1991
Page 3
compliance or noncompliance of the affected facility.
The same analysts, analytical reagents, and analytical system shall be used
for the compliance samples and the EPA audit samples; if this condition is met, and
the same testing firm is collecting other sets of compliance samples, auditing of
subsequent compliance analyses for the same enforcement agency within 30 days is
not required. An audit sample set may not be used to validate different sets of
compliance samples under the jurisdiction of different enforcement agencies, unless
prior arrangements are made with both enforcement agencies.
During the audit, the audit supervisor should record the coded cylinder
number(s) and cylinder pressure(s) on the "Audit Report" form, Figure 8.1. The
individual being audited must not be told the actual audit concentrations or the
calculated audit percent accuracy.
On-site Collection of Audit Sample(s) - The cylinder gas performance audit
must be conducted in the field (not laboratory) at the same time the compliance
test samples are being taken. A maximum of 5L of audit gas is to be used for each
test run unless multiple tanks are required for sampling. The tester will be
required to supply a two-stage regulator (CGA - 350), a glass manifold or Teflon
tee connection and other suitable Swagelok fittings (they are not supplied) for use
with the audit gas cylinder. The recommended procedures for conducting the on-site
audit sample collection are as follows:
1. The audit supervisor (agency representative) should verify that the seal
affixed by shipping or supplying laboratory is still intact. After the
seal has been checked by the audit supervisor, the tester may break the
seal. However, if the audit supervisor is not present at the time of the
audit, the tester may break the seal and proceed with the audit.
2. The tester should set up the Method 25 sampling train and perform the leak
check.
3. The audit gas from the cylinder has to be sampled at atmospheric pressure
either from a glass manifold or through a Teflon tee connection. This can
be done by attaching both the cylinder and the probe of the Method 25
sampling train to two of the manifold or tee connections while excess gas
flows out through the remaining connection as shown in Figure 8.2. This
can be accomplished by starting the cylinder gas flow into the manifold or
tee with the sampling train flow turned off. Then, turn on the sampling
train flow while adjusting the flow from the audit cylinder to ensure
excess audit gas flow from the manifold or tee. After the proper sampling
flow rate has been obtained in the sampling train, adjust the audit cylin-
der so only a few cubic centimeters of excess gas is discharged from the
manifold or tee. The tester must ensure that the audit gas is conserved.
4. Use the same sampling flow rate and sample volume as used for field test
samples. When a constant flow rate can no longer be maintained by the
sampling train, it should be turned off and then the audit cylinder shut
off. Ensure that the audit cylinder is closed tight to prevent leakage.
If the compliance test requires more than one sample tank to complete a
run, the audit should use the same number of tanks required by the average
run.
5. The same procedures are repeated for the second audit cylinder using"a
separate sampling train.
6. The sampling trains containing the audit samples should be stored and
shipped in the same manner as and along with the field test samples.
7. In all cases, it is recommended that the audit supervisor reseal the audit
cylinders to ensure no tampering. However, if the test firm is to return
the cylinder to shipping or supplying laboratory, it is mandatory that the
-------
o
Section No. 3.17-8
Date May 31, 1991
Page 4
audit cylinders are resealed by the audit supervisor.
8. The audit cylinders are to be returned immediately after the test to the
EPA/QAD contractor at the cost of the facility (or tester if applicable)
either by ground transportation or air cargo. They are not to be shipped
collect.
Analysts of Audit Sample(s) - Analyze the collected audit sample fractions
(condensibles and noncondensibles) at the same time as the Method 25 compliance
test samples. Follow the procedures described in the method for sample analysis,
calibration, and calculations. The same analysts, analytical reagents, and
analytical system shall be used,for b9th the compliance test samples and the EPA
audit samples.
Reporting of Audit Sample(s) Results - The reporting of the audit results
should be the responsibility of the tester to ensure taht the data is acceptable
and valid. The audit sample results are to be reported to the responsible agency
by the testing firm in terms of condensibles (U-trap fraction), noncondensibles
(tank fraction), and total (sum of both fractions) as parts-per-million carbon (ppm
C). The agency will in turn report the results to the EPA/QAD contractor for
continuing evaluation of the Method 25 audit program. Additionally, the tester
must supply document in the test report, the results of both audit samples as
described above, their identification numbers, and the analyst's name along with
the results of the compliance determination samples. The operator of the affected
facility is responsible for the dissemination of any compliance sample results and
the correct distribution of reports to the EPA regional office or the appropriate
enforcement agency during the 30-day period for which the audit samples represent. (i
8.1.2 Performance Audit of Data Processing - Calculation errors are prevalent in
processing data. Data processing errors can be determined by auditing the recorded
data on the field and laboratory forms. The original and audit (check) calcula-
tions should agree within round-off error; if not, all of the remaining data should
be checked. The data processing may also be audited by providing the testing
laboratory with specific data sets (exactly as would appear in the field), and by
requesting that the data calculation be completed and that the results be returned
to the agency. This audit is useful in checking both computer programs and manual
methods of data processing.
8.2 Systems Audit
A systems audit is an on-site, qualitative inspection and review of the total
measurement system (sample collection, sample analysis, etc.). Initially, a
systems audit is recommended for each enforcement source test, defined here as a
series of three runs at one source. After the test team gains experience with the
method, the frequency of auditing may be reduced — for example, to once every four
tests.
The auditor should have extensive background experience in source sampling,
specifically with the measurement system being audited. The functions of the
auditor are summarized below:
1. Inform the testing team of the results from previous audits, specifying
any area(s) that need special attention or improvement.
2. Observe procedures and techniques of the field team during sample collec-
tion.
3. Check/verify records of apparatus calibration checks and quality control
used in the laboratory analysis of control samples from previous source
-------
Section No. 3.1?.8
Date May 31, 1991
Page 5
tests, where applicable.
4. Record the results of the audit, and forward them with comments to the
test team management so that appropriate corrective action may be
initiated.
While on site, the auditor observes the source test team's overall perfor-
mance, including the following specific operations:
1. Setting up and leak testing the sampling train.
2. Collecting the sample at a constant rate at the specified flow rate.
3. Conducting the final leak check and recovery of the samples.
4. Sample documentation procedures, sample recovery, and preparation of
samples for shipment.
Figure 8.3 is a suggested checklist for the auditor.
-------
Section No. 3.17-8
Date Hay 31, 1991
Page 6
AUDIT REPORT
O
Part A. - To be filled out by organization supplying audit cylinders.
1. Organization supplying audit sample(s) and shipping address
2. Audit supervisor, organization, and phone number
3. Shipping instructions: Name, Address, Attention
4. Guaranteed arrival date for cylinders - '
5. Planned shipping date for cylinders -
6. Details on audit cylinders from last analysis
d. Audit gas (es) /balance gas..
f . Cylinder construction. .....
Low cone.
N2
Aluminum
High cone
N2
Aluminum
Part B. - To be filled out by audit supervisor.
1. Process sampled
Audit location
2.
3-
Name of individual audit
Audit date
O
5. Audit cylinders sealed
6. Audit results:
d. Measured concentration, ppm C
e. Actual audit concentration, ppm C
f. Audit accuracy:1
Percent accuracy1 =
Measured Cone. - Actual Cone. x 100
Actual Cone.
g. Problems detected (if any)
Low
cone.
cylinder
High
cone.
cylinder
1The audit accuracy is calculated on the total concentration only.
Figure 8.1. Field audit report form.
O
-------
Section No. 3.17.8
Date May 31, 1991
Page 7
MANOMETER
EXCESS
FLOW
FLOW
CONTROL
VALVE
ROTAMETER
ROTAMETER
TEFLON TEE"
OR MANIFOLD
4-
SAMPLE
TANK
VALVE
CONDENSATE
TRAP
SAMPLE
TANK
AUDIT
CYLINDER
(in
>|Lj
Figure 8.2. Schematic of Method 25 audit system.
-------
Section No. 3.17-8
Date May 31. 1991
Page 8
o
Yes
1 v
No
Comments
Operation
PRESAMPLING PREPARATION
1. Knowledge of process operations
2. Calibration of pertinent equipment, in
particular, temperature readouts and flowmeters
3. Selection and checkout of equipment for proper
sampling techniques
ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
* 4. Sampling system properly assembled
5. ^Sampling system leak check acceptable
6. Sample probe and filter at proper temperature
7. Sample system purged properly
8. Constant rate sampling properly conducted
9. Heater systems maintained at proper temperatures
10. Proper number of samples & sampling time
11. Recording of pertinent process conditions during
sample collection, samples properly identified,
and calculations properly conducted
POSTSAMPLING
12. Results of audit (+ 20% or other value)
13. Oxidation catalyst efficiency test acceptable
14. Reduction catalyst efficiency test acceptable
15. NMO linearity and calibration test acceptable
16. C02 linearity and calibration test acceptable
17. NMO analyzer performance test acceptable
18. Condensible organic recovery system leak check
19. System background test acceptable
20. Temperature, volumes, pressures, and concen-
trations properly recorded
21. Analytical results properly calculated
COMMENTS
O
Figure 8.3. Method 25 checklist to be used by auditors.
O
-------
Section No. 3.17-8
Date May 31, 1991
Page 9
Table 8.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR AUDITING PROCEDURES
Apparatus
Performance
audit of
analytical phase
Acceptance limits
Measured relative
error of audit
samples less than
20% for both samples
Frequency and method
of measurement
Frequency: Once during
every enforcement
source test*
Method; Measure audit
samples and compare
results to true values
Action if
requirements
are not met
Review operating
technique and
repeat audit,
repeat test,
reject test, or
accept results
Data processing
errors
Original and checked
calculations agree
within round-off
error
Frequency: Once during
every enforcement
source test*
Method; Independent
calculations starting
with recorded data
Check and correct
all data from the
audit period
represented by
the checked data
Systems audit—
observance
of technique
Operational tech-
nique as described
in this section of
the Handbook
Frequency; Once during
every enforcement
source test* until
experience gained,
then every fourth
test
Method; Observation of
techniques assisted
by audit checklist,
Figure 8.3
Explain to test
team their devia-
tions from rec-
commended tech-
niques and note
on Fig. 8.3
*As defined here, a source test for enforcement of the NSPS comprises a series of
runs at one source. Source tests for purposes other than enforcement of NSPS may
be audited at the frequency determined by the applicable group.
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.17-9
Date May 31, 1991
Page 1
9.0 RECOMMENDED STANDARDS FOR ESTABLISHING TRACEABILITY
To achieve data of desired quality, two essential considerations are
necessary: (1) the measurement process must be in a state of statistical control
at the time of the measurement, and (2) the systematic errors, when combined with
the random variation (errors or measurment), must result in an acceptable
uncertainty. As evidence in support of good quality data, it is necessary to
perform quality control checks and independent audits of the measurement process;
to document these data; and to use materials, instruments, and measurement
procedures that can be traced to an apropriate standard of reference.
Data must be routinely obtained by repeat measurements of standard reference
samples (primary, secondary, and/or working standards) and the establishment of a
condition of process control. The working calibration standards should be
traceable to standards of higher accuracy. It is recommended, but not required,
that the analyst use a NBS-SRM for propane to make the analysis traceable to an NBS
Standard Reference Material.
Audit samples (as discussed in Section 3.17.8) must be used to validate test
results for compliance determination purposes and are recommendeed as an
independent check on the measurement process when the method is performed for other
purposes. This makes all the compliance determination samples traceable to the
same audit source at EPA.
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.17.10
Date May 31, 1991
Page 1
10.0 REFERENCE METHOD
Method 25 - Determination of Total Gaseous NonMethane
Organic Emissions as Carbon
1. Applicability and Principle
1.1 Applicability. This method applies to the measurement of volatile organic
compounds (VOC) as total gaseous nonmethane organics (TGNMO) as carbon in source
emissions. Organic particulate matter will interfere with the analysis, and,
therefore, a particulate filter is required. The minimum detectable concentration
for the method is 50 ppm as carbon.
When carbon dioxide (C02) and water vapor are present together in the stack,
they can produce a positive bias in the sample. The magnitude of the bias depends
on the concentration of C02 and water vapor. As a guideline, multiply the C02
concentration, expressed as volume percent, times the water vapor concentration.
If this product does not exceed 100, the bias can be considered insignificant. For
example, the bias is not significant for a source having 10 percent C02 and 10
percent water vapor, but it would be significant for a source near the detection
limit having 10 percent C02 and 20 percent water vapor.
This method is not the only method that applies to the measurement of TGNMO.
Costs, logistics, and other practicalities of source testing may make other test
methods more desirable for measuring VOC contents of certain effluent streams.
Proper judgment is required in determining the most applicable VOC test method.
For example, depending upon the molecular weight of the organics in the effluent
stream, a totally automated semicontinuous nonmethane organics (NMO) analyzer
interfaced directly to the source may yield accurate results. This approach has
the advantage of providing emission data semicontinuously over an extended time
period.
Direct measurement of an effluent with a flame ionization detector (FID)
analyzer may be appropriate with prior characterization of the gas stream and
knowledge that the detector responds predictably to the organic compounds in the
stream. If present, methane (CHA) will, of course, also be measured. The FID can
be applied to the determination of the mass concentration of the total molecular
structure of the organic emissions under any of the following limited conditions:
(1) where only one compound is known to exist; (2) when the organic compounds
consist of only hydrogen and carbon; (3) where the relative percentages of the
compounds are known or can be determined, and the FID responses to the compounds
are known; (4) where a consistent mixture of the compounds exists before and after
emission control and only the relative concentrations are to be assessed; or (5)
where the FID can be calibrated against mass standards of the compounds emitted
(solvent emissions, for example).
Another example of the use of a direct FID is as a screening method. If there
is enough information available to provide a rough estimate of the analyzer
accuracy, the FID analyzer can be used to determine the VOC content of an
uncharacterized gas stream. With a sufficient buffer to account for possible
inaccuracies, the direct FID can be a useful tool to obtain the desired results
without costly exact determination. In situations where a qualitative/
quantitative analysis of an effluent stream is desired or required, a gas
chromatographic FID system may apply. However, for sources emitting numerous
organics, the time and expense of this approach will be formidable.
1
-------
Section No. 3.17.10
Date May 31. 1991
Page 2
o
1.2 Principle. An emission sample is withdrawn from the stack at a constant
rate through a heated filter and a chilled condensate trap by means of an evacuated
sample tank. After sampling is completed, the TGNMO are determined by
independently analyzing the condensate trap and sample tank fractions and combining
the analytical results. The organic content of the condensate trap fraction is
determined by oxidizing the NMO to C02 and quantitatively collecting the effluent
in an evacuated vessel; then a portion of the C02 is reduced to CHA and measured by
an FID. The organic content of the sample tank fraction is measured by injecting a
portion of the sample into a gas chromatographic column to separate the NMO from
carbon monoxide (CO). C02. and CH/,; the NMO are oxidized to C02. reduced to CHA.
and measured by an FID. In this manner, the variable response of the FID
associated with different types of organics is eliminated.
2. Apparatus
2.1 Sampling. The sampling system consists of a heated probe, heated filter,
condensate trap, flow control system, and sample tank (Figure 25~1). The TGNMO
sampling equipment can be constructed from commercially available components and
components fabricated in a machine shop. The following equipment is required:
2.1.1 Heated Probe. 6.4-mm (1/4-in.) OD stainless steel tubing with a heating
system capable of maintaining a gas temperature at the exit end of at least 129°C
(265°F). The probe shall be equipped with a thermocouple at the exit end to
monitor the gas temperature. x""N.
A suitable probe is shown in Figure 25~1• The nozzle is an elbow f ittingf A
attached to the front end of the probe while the thermocouple is inserted in the\__y
side arm of a tee fitting attached to the rear of the probe. The probe is wrapped
with a suitable length of high temperature heating tape, and then covered with two
layers of glass cloth insulation and one layer of aluminum foil.
NOTE; If it is not possible to use a heating system for safety reasons, an
unheated system with an in-stack filter is a suitable alternative.
2.1.2 Filter Holder. 25-mm (15/l6-in.) ID Gelman filter holder with stainless
steel body and stainless steel support screen with the Viton 0-ring replaced by a
Teflon 0-ring.
NOTE; Mention of trade names or specific products does not constitute
endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
2.1.3 Filter Heating System. A metal box consisting of an inner and an outer
shell separated by insulating material with a heating element in the inner shell
capable of maintaining a gas temperature at the filter of 121 +_ 3°C (250 +_ 5°F).
A suitable heating box is shown in Figure 25-2. The outer shell is a metal
box that measures 102 mm x 280 mm x 292 mm (4 in. x 11 in. x 11 1/2 in.), while the
inner shell is a metal box measuring 76 mm x 229 mm x 2*41 mm (3 in. x 9 in. x 9 1/2
in.). The inner box is supported by 13-mm (1/2-in.) phenolic rods. The void space
between the boxes is filled with fiberfrax insulation which is sealed in place by
means of a silicon rubber bead around the upper sides of the box. A removable lid
made in a similar manner, with a 25-mm (1-in.) gap between the parts, is used to
cover the heating chamber.
The inner box is heated with a 250-watt cartridge heater, shielded by a f~\
stainless steel shroud. The heater is regulated by a thermostatic temperaturef
controller which is set to maintain a temperature of 121° C as measured by a
thermocouple in the gas line just before the filter. An additional thermocouple is
-------
Section No. 3.17.10
Date May 31, 1991
Page 3
used to monitor the temperature of the gas behind the filter.
2.1.4 Condensate Trap. 9.5-mm (3/8-in.) OD 316 stainless steel tubing bent
into a U-shape. Exact dimensions are shown in Figure 25-3. The tubing shall be
packed with coarse quartz wool, to a density of approximately 0.11 g/cc before
bending. While the condensate trap is packed with dry ice in the Dewar, an ice
bridge may form between the arms of the condensate trap making it difficult to
remove the condensate trap. This problem can be prevented by attaching a steel
plate between the arms of the condensate trap in the same plane as the arms to
completely fill the intervening space.
2.1.5 Valve. Stainless steel shut-off valve for starting and stopping sample
flow.
2.1.6 Metering Valve. Stainless steel control valve for regulating the sample
flow rate through the sample train.
2.1.7 Rotameter. Glass tube with stainless steel fittings, capable of
measuring sample flow in the range of 60 to 100 cc/min.
2.1.8 Sample Tank. Stainless steel or aluminum tank with a minimum volume of
4 liters.
2.1.9 Mercury Manometer or Absolute Pressure Gauge. Capable of measuring
pressure to within 1 mm Hg in the range of 0 to 900 mm.
2.1.10 Vacuum Pump. Capable of evacuating to an absolute pressure of 10 mm
Hg.
2.2. Condensate Recovery Apparatus. The system for the recovery of the
organics captured in the condensate trap consists of a heat source, oxidation
catalyst, nondispersive infrared (NDIR) analyzer and an intermediate collection
vessel (ICV). Figure 25-4 is a schematic of a typical system. The system shall be
capable of proper oxidation and recovery, as specified in Section 5«1. The
following major components are required:
2.2.1 Heat Source. Sufficient to heat the condensate trap (including
connecting tubing) to a temperature of 200°C. A system using both a heat gun and
an electric tube furnace is recommended.
2.2.2 Heat Tape. Sufficient to heat the connecting tubing between the water
trap and the oxidation catalyst to 100°C.
2.2.3. Oxidation Catalyst. A suitable length of 9.5-mm (3/8-in.) OD Inconel
600 tubing packed with 15 cm (6 in.) of 3.2-mm (1/8-in.) diameter 19 percent
chromia on alumina pellets. The catalyst material is packed in the center of the
catalyst tube with quartz wool packed on either end to hold it in place. The
catalyst tube shall be mounted vertically in a 650°C tube furnace.
2.2.4 Water Trap. Leak proof, capable of removing moisture from the gas
stream.
2.2.5 Syringe Port. A 6.4-mm (1/4-in.) OD stainless steel tee fitting with a
-------
Section No. 3.17.10
Date May 31, 1991
Page 4
rubber septum placed in the side arm.
2.2.6 NDIR Detector. Capable of indicating C02 concentration in the range of
zero to 5 percent, to monitor the progress of combustion of the organic compounds
from the condensate trap.
2.2.7 Flow-Control Valve. Stainless steel, to maintain the trap conditioning
system near atmospheric pressure.
2.2.8 Intermediate Collection Vessel. Stainless steel or aluminum, equipped
with a female quick connect. Tanks with nominal volumes of at least 6 liters are
recommended. \ r
2.2.9 Mercury Manometer or Absolute Pressure Gauge.
pressure to within 1 mm Hg in the range of 0 to 900 mm.
Capable of measuring
2.2.10 Syringe. 10-ml gas-tight, glass syringe equipped with an appropriate
needle. •""•'
2.3 NMO Analyzer. The NMO analyzer is a gas chromatograph (GC) with
backflush capability for NMO analysis and is equipped with an oxidation catalyst,
reduction catalyst, and FID. Figures 25-5 and 25-6 are schematics of a typical NMO
analyzer. This semicontinuous GC/FID analyzer shall be capable of: (1) separating
CO, C02 , and CH4 from NMO, (2) reducing the C02 to CHA and quantifying as CH^,. and
(3) oxidizing the NMO to C02, reducing the C02 to CH4 and quantifying as CH4.
according to Section 5-2. The analyzer consists of the following major components:
2.3.1 Oxidation Catalyst. A suitable length of 9.5-mm (3/8-in.) OD Inconel
600 tubing packed with 5-1 cm (2 in.) of 19 percent chromia on 3«2-mm (1/8-in.)
alumina pellets. The catalyst material is packed in the center of the tube
supported on either side by quartz wool. The catalyst tube must be mounted
vertically in a 650°C furnace.
2.3.2 Reduction Catalyst. A 7.6-cm (3-in.) length of 6.4-mm (1/4-in.) OD
Inconel tubing fully packed with 100-mesh pure nickel powder. The catalyst tube
must be mounted vertically in a 400°C furnace.
2.3.3 Separation Column(s). A 30-cm (1-ft) length of 3.2-mm (1/8-in.) OD
stainless steel tubing packed with 60/80 mesh Unibeads IS followed by a 6l-cm (2-
ft) length of 3.2-mm (1/8-in.) OD stainless steel tubing packed with 60/80 mesh
Carbosieve G. The Carbosieve and Unibeads columns must be baked separately at
200°C with carrier gas flowing through them for 24 hours before initial use.
f
2.3.4 Sample Injection System. A 10-port GC sample injection valve fitted
with a sample loop properly sized to interface with the NMO analyzer (1-cc loop
recommended).
2.3.5 FID. An FID meeting the following specifications is required:
2.3.5-1 Linearity. A linear response (j+5 percent) over the operating range
as demonstrated by the procedures established in Section 5.2.3.
2.3.5.2 Range. A full scale range of 10 to 50,000 ppm CHA. Signal
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.17.10
Date May 31, 1991
Page 5
attenuators shall be available to produce a minimum signal response of 10 percent
of full scale.
2.3.6 Data Recording System. Analog strip chart recorder or digital
integration system compatible with the FID for permanently recording the
analytical results.
2.4 Other Analysis Apparatus.
2.4.1 Barometer. Mercury, aneroid, or other barometer capable of measuring
atmospheric pressure to within 1 mm Hg.
2.4.2 Thermometer. Capable of measuring the laboratory temperature to within
1°C.
2.4.3 Vacuum Pump. Capable of evacuating to an absolute pressure of 10 mm
Hg.
2.4.4 Syringes. 10-ul and 50-ul liquid injection syringes.
2.4.5 Liquid Sample Injection Unit. 316 SS U-tube fitted with an injection
septum, see Figure 25~7-
3. Reagents
3.1 Sampling. The following are required for sampling:
3-1.1 Crushed Dry Ice.
3-1.2 Coarse Quartz Wool. 8 to 15 urn.
- ' .•'
3.1.3 Filters. Glass fiber filters, without organic binder.
3.2 NMO Analysis. The following gases are needed:
3.2.1 Carrier Gases. Zero grade helium (He) and oxygen (02) containing less
than 1 ppm C02 and less than 0.1 ppm C as hydrocarbon.
3-2.2 Fuel Gas. Zero grade hydrogen (H2), 99.999 percent pure.
3.2.3 Combustion Gas. Zero grade air or 02 as required by the detector.
3-3 Condensate Analysis. The following gases are needed:
3.3-1 Carrier Gas. Zero grade air, containing less than 1 ppm C.
3.3«2 Auxiliary 02. Zero grade 02, containing less than 1 ppm C.
3.3.3 Hexane. ACS grade, for liquid injection.
3.3.4 Decane. ACS grade, for liquid injection.
3.4 Calibration. For all calibration gases, the manufacturer must recommend
-------
Section No. 3-17-10
Date May 31, 1991 -^
Page 6 (l
a maximum shelf life for each cylinder (i.e., the length of time the gas
concentration is not expected to change more than +_ 5 percent from its certified
value). The date of gas cylinder preparation, certified organic concentration, and
recommended maximum shelf life must be affixed to each cylinder before shipment
from the gas manufacturer to the buyer. The following calibration gases are
required:
3.4.1 Oxidation Catalyst Efficiency Check Calibration Gas. Gas mixture
standard with nominal concentration of 1 percent methane in air.
3.4.2 FID Linearity and NMO Calibration Gases. Three gas mixture standards
with nominal propane concentrations of 20 ppm, 200 ppm, and 3000 ppm, in air.
3.4.3 C02 Calibration Gases. Three gas mixture standards with nominal C02
concentrations of 50 ppm, 500 ppm, and 1 percent, in air.
NOTE; Total NMO of less than 1 ppm required for 1 percent mixture.
3.4.4 NMO Analyzer System Check Calibration Gases. Four calibration gases
are needed as follows:
3-4.4.1 Propane Mixture. Gas mixture standard containing (nominal) 50 ppm
CO, 50 ppm CH4, 2 percent C02, and 20 ppm C3H8, prepared in air.
3.4.4.2 Hexane. Gas mixture standard containing (nominal) 50 ppm hexane in s~*\
o
3.4.4.3 Toluene. Gas mixture standard containing (nominal) 20 ppm toluene in
air.
3.4.4.4 Methanol. Gas mixture standard containing (nominal) 100 ppm methanol
in air.
4. Procedure
4.1 Sampling.
4.1.1 Cleaning Sampling Equipment. Before its initial use and after each
subsequent use, a condensate trap should be thoroughly cleaned and checked to
insure that it is not contaminated. Both cleaning and checking can be accomplished
by installing the trap in the condensate recovery system and treating it as if it
were a sample. The trap should be heated as described in the final paragraph of
Section 4.3.3- A trap may be considered clean when the C02 concentration in its
effluent gas drops below 10 ppm. This check is optional for traps that have been
used to collect samples which were then recovered according to the procedure in
Section 4.3.3.
4.1.2 Sample Tank Evacuation and Leak Check. Evacuate the sample tank to 10
mm Hg absolute pressure or less. Then close the sample tank valve, and allow the
tank to sit for 60 minutes. The tank is acceptable if no change in tank vacuum is
noted. The evacuation and leak check may be conducted either in the laboratory or
the field. The results of the leak check should be included in the test report.
4.1.3 Sample Train Assembly. Just before assembly, measure the tank vacuum
using a mercury U-tube manometer or absolute pressure gauge. Record this vacuum,
V.
O
-------
Section No. 3.17.10
Date May 31, 1991
Page 7
the ambient temperature, and the barometric pressure at this time. Close the
sample tank valve and assemble the sampling system as shown in Figure 25~1.
Immerse the condensate trap body in dry ice. The point where the inlet tube joins
the trap body should be 2.5 to 5 cm above the top of the dry ice.
4.1.4 Pretest Leak Check. A pretest leak check is required. Calculate or
measure the approximate volume of the sampling train from the probe trip to the
sample tank valve. After assembling the sampling train, plug the probe tip, and
make certain that the sample tank valve is closed. Turn on the vacuum pump, and
evacuate the sampling system from the probe tip to the sample tank valve to an
absolute pressure of 10 ppm Hg or less. Close the purge valve, turn off the pump,
wait a minimum period of 5 minutes, and recheck the indicated vacuum. Calculate
the maximum allowable pressure change based on a leak rate of 1 percent of the
sampling rate using Equation 25-1, Section 6.2. If the measured pressure change
exceeds the calculated limit, correct the problem before beginning sampling. The
results of the leak check should be included in the test report.
4.1.5 Sample Train Operation. Unplug the probe tip, and place the probe into
the stack such that the probe is perpendicular to the duct or stack axis; locate
the probe tip at a single preselected point of average velocity facing away from
the direction of gas flow. For stacks having a negative static pressure, seal the
El sample port sufficiently to prevent air in-leakage around the probe. Set the probe
temperature controller to 129°C (265°F) and the filter temperature controller to
121°C (250°F). Allow the probe and filter to heat for about 30 minutes before
purging the sample train.
Close the sample valve, open the purge valve, and start the vacuum pump. Set
the flow rate between 60 and 100 cc/min, and purge the train with stack gas for at
least 10 minutes. When the temperatures at the exit ends of the probe and filter
are within their specified range, sampling may begin.
Check the dry ice level around the condensate trap, and add dry ice if
necessary. Record the clock time. To begin sampling, close the purge valve and
stop the pump. Open the sample valve and the sample tank valve. Using the flow
control valve, set the flow through the sample train to the proper rate. Adjust
the flow rate as necessary to maintain a constant rate (+^10 percent) throughout the
duration of the sampling period. Record the sample tank vacuum and flowmeter
setting at 5~m±nute intervals. (See Figure 25-8.) Select a total sample time
greater than or equal to the minimum sampling time specified in the applicable
subpart of the regulation; end the sampling when this time period is reached or
when a constant flow rate can no longer be maintained because of reduced sample
tank vacuum.
NOTE; If sampling had to be stopped before obtaining the minimum sampling
time (specified in the applicable subpart) because a constant flow rate could not
be maintained, proceed as follows: After closing the sample tank valve, remove the
used sample tank from the sampling train (without disconnecting other portions of
the sampling train). Take another evacuated and leak-checked sample tank, measure
and record the tank vacuum, and attach the new tank to the sampling train. After
the new tank is attached to the sample train, proceed with the sampling until the
required minimum sampling time has been exceeded.
4.2 Sample Recovery. After sampling is completed, close the flow control
valve, and record the final tank vacuum; then record the tank temperature and
barometric pressure. Close the sample tank valve, and disconnect the sample tank
from the sample system. Disconnect the condensate trap at the flowmetering system,
-------
Section No. 3.17.10
Date Hay 31, 1991
Page 8 S~\
and tightly seal both ends of the condensate trap. Do not Include the probe from
the stack to the filter as part of the condensate sample. Keep the trap packed in
dry ice until the samples are returned to the laboratory for analysis. Ensure that
the test run number is properly identified on the condensate trap and the
sample tank(s).
4.3 Condensate Recovery. See Figure 25-9. Set the carrier gas flow rate,
and heat the catalyst to its operating temperature to condition the apparatus.
4.3.1 Daily Performance Checks. Each day before analyzing any samples,
perform the following tests:
*. J
4.3.1.1 Leak Check, With the carrier gas inlets and the flow control valve
closed, install a clean condensate trap in the system, and evacuate the system to
10 mm Hg absolute pressure or less. Close the vacuum pump valve and turn off the
vacuum pump. Monitor the system pressure for 10 minutes. The system is acceptable
if the pressure change is less than 2 mm Hg.
4.3.1.2 System Background Test. Adjust the carrier gas and auxiliary oxygen
flow rate to their normal values of 100 cc/min and 150 cc/min, respectively, with
the sample recovery valve in vent position. Using a 10-ml syringe withdraw a
sample from the system effluent through the syringe port. Inject this sample into
the NMO analyzer, and measure the C02 content. The system background is acceptable
if the C02 concentration is less than 10 ppm.
4.3.1.3 Oxidation Catalyst Efficiency Check. Conduct a catalyst efficiency \J
test as specified in Section 5.1-2 of this method. If the criterion of this test
cannot be met, make the necessary repairs to the system before proceeding.
4.3.2 Condensate Trap C02 Purge and Sample Tank Pressurization. After
sampling is completed, the condensate trap will contain condensed water and
organics and a small volume of sampled gas. This gas from the stack may contain a
significant amount of C02 which must be removed from the condensate trap before the
sample is recovered. This is accomplished by purging the condensate trap with zero
air and collecting the purged gas in the original sample tank.
Begin with the sample tank and condensate trap from the test run to be
analyzed. Set the four-port valve of the condensate recovery system in the C02
purge position as shown in Figure 25-9- With the sample tank valve closed, attach
the sample tank to the sample recovery system. With the sample recovery valve in
the vent position and the flow control valve fully open, evacuate the manometer or
pressure gauge to the vacuum of the sample tank. Next, close the vacuum pump
valve, open the sample tank valve, and record the tank pressure.
Attach the dry-ice-cooled condensate trap to the recovery system, and
initiate the purge by switching the sample recovery valve from vent to collect
position. Adjust the flow control valve to maintain atmospheric pressure in the
recovery system. Continue the purge until the C02 concentration of the trap
effluent is less than 5 ppm. C02 concentration in the trap effluent should be
measured by extracting syringe samples from the recovery system and analyzing the
samples with the NMO analyzer. This procedure should be used only after the NDIR
response has reached a minimum level. Using a 10-ml syringe, extract a sample from
the syringe port prior to the NDIR, and inject this sample into the NMO analyzer.
o
-------
Section No. 3.17.10
Date May 31, 1991
Page 9
After the completion of the C02 purge, use the carrier gas bypass valve to
pressurize the sample tank to approximately 1060 mm Hg absolute pressure with zero
air.
4.3.3 Recovery of the Condensate Trap Sample. See Figure 25-10. Attach the
ICV to the sample recovery system. With; the sample recovery valve in a closed
position, between vent and collect, and the flow control and ICV valves fully open,
evacuate the manometer or gauge, the connecting tubing, and the ICV to 10 mm Hg
absolute pressure. Close the flow-control and vacuum pump valves.
Begin auxiliary oxygen flow to the oxidation catalyst at a rate of 150
cc/min, then switch the four-way valve to the trap recovery position and the
sample recovery valve to collect position. The system should now be set up to
operate as indicated in Figure 25-10. After the manometer or pressure gauge begins
to register a slight positive pressure, open the flow control valve. Adjust the
flow-control valve to maintain atmospheric pressure in the system within 10
percent.
Now, remove the condensate trap from the dry ice, and allow it to warm to
ambient temperature while monitoring the NDIR response. If after 5 minutes, the
C02 concentration of the catalyst effluent is below 10,000 ppm, discontinue the
auxiliary oxygen flow to the oxidation catalyst. Begin heating the trap by placing
it in a furnace preheated to 200°C. Once heating has begun, carefully monitor the
NDIR response to ensure that the catalyst effluent concentration does not exceed
50,000 ppm. Whenever the C02 concentration exceeds 50,000 ppm, supply auxiliary
oxygen to the catalyst at the rate of 150 cc/min. Begin heating the tubing that
connected the heated sample box to the condensate trap only after the C02
concentration falls below 10,000 ppm. This tubing may be heated in the same oven
as the condensate trap or with an auxiliary heat source such as a heat gun.
Heating temperature must not exceed 200°C. If a heat gun is used, heat the tubing
slowly along its entire length from the upstream end to the downstream end, and
repeat the pattern for a total of three times. Continue the recovery until the C02
concentration drops to less than 10 ppm as determined by syringe injection as
described under the condensate trap C02 purge procedure, Section 4.3.2.
After the sample recovery is completed, use the carrier gas bypass valve to
pressurize the ICV to approximately 1060 mm Hg absolute pressure with zero air.
4.4 Analysis. Before putting the NMO analyzer into routine operation,
conduct an initial performance test. Start the analyzer, and perform all the
necessary functions in order to put the analyzer into proper working order; then
conduct the performance test according to the procedures established in Section
5.2. Once the performance test has been successfully completed and the C02 and NMO
calibration response factors have been determined, proceed with sample analysis as
follows:
4.4.1 Daily Operations and Calibration Checks. Before and immediately after
the analysis of each set of samples or on a daily basis {whichever occurs first),
conduct a calibration test according to the procedures established in Section 5.3-
If the criteria of the daily calibration test cannot be met, repeat the NMO
analyzer performance test (Section 5*2) before proceeding.
4.4.2 Operating Conditions. The carrier gas flow rate is 29.5 cc/min He and
2.2 cc/min 02 . The column oven is heated to 85°C. The order of elutiori for the
sample from the column is CO, CHA, C02, and NMO.
-------
Section No. 3.17.10
Date May 31, 1991
Page 10
4.4.3 Analysis of Recovered Condensate Sample. Purge the sample loop with
sample, and then inject the sample. Under the specified operating conditions, the
CO, in the sample will elute in approximately 100 seconds. As soon as the detector
response returns to baseline following the C02 peak, switch the carrier gas flow ,to
backflush, and raise the column oven temperature to 195°C as rapidly as possible.
A rate of 30°C/min has been shown to be adequate. Record the value obtained for
the condensible organic material (Ccm) measured as C02 and any measured NMO.
Return the column oven temperature to 85°C in preparation for the next analysis.
Analyze each sample in triplicate, and report the average Ccm.
4.4.4 Analysis of Sample Tank. Perform the analysis as described in Section
4.4.3, but record only the value measured for NMO (Ctm).
4.5 Audit Samples. Analyze a set of two audit samples concurrently with any
compliance samples and in exactly the same manner to evaluate the analyst's
technique and the instrument calibration. The same analysts, analytical reagents,
and analytical system shall be used for the compliance samples and the EPA audit
samples; if this condition is met, auditing of subsequent compliance analyses for
the same enforcement agency within 30 days is not required. An audit sample set
may not be used to validate different sets of compliance samples under the
jurisdiction of different enforcement agencies, unless prior arrangements are made
with both enforcement agencies.
Calculate the concentrations of the audit samples in ppm using the specified
sample volume in the audit instructions. (NOTE; Indication of acceptable results
may be obtained immediately by reporting the audit results in ppm and compliance
results in ppm by telephone to the responsible enforcement agency.) Include the
results of both audit samples, their identification numbers, and the analyst's name
with the results of the compliance determination samples in appropriate reports to
the EPA regional office or the appropriate enforcement agency during the 30-day
period.
The concentration of the audit samples obtained by the analyst shall agree
within 20 percent of the actual concentrations. Failure to meet the 20 percent
specification may require retests until the audit problems are resolved. However,
if the audit results do not affect the compliance or noncompliance status of the
affected facility, the Administrator may waive the reanalysis requirement, further
audits, or retests and accept the results of the compliance test. While steps are
being taken to resolve audit analysis problems, the Administrator may also choose
to use the data to determine the compliance or noncompliance of the affected
facility. .
5. Calibration and Operational Checks
Maintain a record of performance of each item.
5-1 Initial Performance Check of Condensate Recovery Apparatus. Perform these
tests before the system is first placed in operation, after any shutdown of 6
months or more, and after any major modification of the system, or at the specified
frequency.
5.1.1 Carrier Gas and Auxiliary 02 Blank Check. Analyze each new tank of
carrier gas or auxiliary 02 with the NMO analyzer to check for contamination.
Treat the gas cylinders as noncondensible gas samples, and analyze according to the
procedure in Section 4.4.3. Add together any measured CHA, CO, C02, or NMO. The
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.17.10
Date May 31, 1991
Page 11
total concentration must be less than 5 ppm.
5.1.2 Catalyst Efficiency Check. With a clean condensate trap installed in
the recovery system, replace the carrier gas cylinder with the high level methane
standard gas cylinder (Section 3 • **•!)• Set the four-port valve to the recovery
position, and attach an ICV to the recovery system. With the sample recovery valve
in vent position and the flow-control and ICV valves fully open, evacuate the
manometer or gauge, the connecting tubing, and the ICV to 10 mm Hg absolute
pressure. Close the flow-control and vacuum pump valves.
After the NDIR response has stabilized, switch the sample recovery valve from
vent to collect. When the manometer or pressure gauge begins to register a slight
positive pressure, open the flow-control valve. Keep the flow adjusted so that
atmospheric pressure is maintained in the system within 10 percent. Continue
collecting the sample in a normal manner until the ICV is filled to a nominal gauge
pressure of 300 mm Hg. Close the ICV valve, and remove the ICV from the system.
Place the sample recovery valve in the vent position, and return the recovery
system to its normal carrier gas and normal operating conditions. Analyze the ICV
for C02 using the NMO analyzer; the catalyst efficiency is acceptable if the C02
concentration is within 2 percent of the methane standard concentration.
5.1.3 System Performance Check. Construct a liquid sample injection unit
similar in design to the unit shown in Figure 25-7 • Insert this unit into the
condensate recovery and conditioning system in place of a condensate trap, and set
the carrier gas and auxiliary 02 flow rates to normal operating levels. Attach an
evacuated ICV to the system, and switch from system vent to collect. With the
carrier gas routed through the injection unit and the oxidation catalyst, inject a
liquid sample (See Sections 5.1-3«1 to 5-1-3-4) into the injection port. Operate
the trap recovery system as described in Section 4.'3«3« Measure the final ICV
pressure, and then analyze the vessel to determine the C02 concentration. For each
injection, calculate the percent recovery using the equation in Section 6.6.
The performance test is acceptable if the average percent recovery is 100 +_ 10
percent with a relative standard deviation (Section 6.9) of less than 5 percent for
each set of triplicate injections as follows:
5.1.3.1 50 ul Hexane.
5.1.3.2 10 ul Hexane.
5.1.3.3 50 ul Decane.
5.1.3.4 10 ul Decane.
5.2 Initial NMO Analyzer Performance Test. Perform these tests before the
system is first placed in operation, after any shutdown longer than 6 months, and
after any major modification of the system.
5.2.1 Oxidation Catalyst Efficiency Check. Turn off or bypass the NMO
analyzer reduction catalyst. Make triplicate injections of the high level methane
standard (Section 3«^-l)- The oxidation catalyst operation is acceptable if the
FID response is less than 1 percent of the injected methane concentration.
5.2.2 Reduction Catalyst Efficiency Check. With the oxidation catalyst
unheated or bypassed and the heated reduction catalyst bypassed, make triplicate
-------
Section No. 3.17.
Date May 31 , 1991
Page 12
injections of the high level methane standard (Section 3.4.1). Repeat this
procedure with both catalysts operative. The reduction catalyst operation is
acceptable if the response under both conditions agree within 5 percent.
5.2.3 Analyzer Linearity Check and NMO Calibration. While operating both the
oxidation and reduction catalysts, conduct a linearity check of the analyzer using
the propane standards specified in Section 3.4.2. Make triplicate injections of
each calibration gas, and then calculate the average response factor (area/ppm C)
for each gas, as well as the overall mean of the response factor values. The
instrument linearity is acceptable if the average response factor of each
calibration gas is within 2.5 percent of the overall mean value and if the relative
standard deviation (Section 6.9) for each set of triplicate injections is less than
2 percent. Record the overall mean of the propane response factor values as the
NMO calibration response factor (RFNMO).
Repeat the linearity check using the C02 standards specified in Section 3-4.3-
Make triplicate injections of each gas, and then calculate the average response
factor (area/ppm C) for each gas, as well as the overall mean of the response
factor values. Record the overall mean of the response factor values as the C02
calibration response factor (RFV,-. ) . Linearity is acceptable if the average
response factor of each calibratlbr? gas is within 2.5 percent of the overall mean
value and if the relative standard deviation for each set of triplicate injections
is less than 2 percent. The RFC_ must be within 10 percent of the RFNM0.
5.2.4 System Performance Check. Check the column separation and overalllJ
performance of the analyzer by making triplicate injections of the calibration
gases listed in Section 3-4.4. The analyzer performance is acceptable if the
measured NMO value for each gas (average of triplicate injections) is within 5
percent of the expected value.
5.3 NMO Analyzer Daily Calibration.
5.3-1 C02 Response Factor. Inject triplicate samples of the high level C02
calibration gas (Section 3-4.3). and calculate the average response factor. The
system operation is adequate if the calculated response factor is within 5 percent
of the RFpQ calculated during the initial performance test (Section 5.2.3). Use
the daily response factor (DFRCQ ) for analyzer calibration and the calculation of
measured C02 concentrations in tKe ICV samples.
5.3-2 NMO Response Factors. Inject triplicate. samples of the mixed propane
calibration cylinder (Section 3-4.4.1), and calculate the average NMO response
factor. The system operation is adequate if the calculated response factor is
within 5 percent of the RFNMO calculated during the initial performance test
(Section 5.2.4). Use the daily response factor (DRFNMO) for analyzer calibration
and calculation of NMO concentrations in the sample tanks.
5.4 Sample Tank and ICV Volume. The volume of the gas sampling tanks used
must be determined. Determine the tank and ICV volumes by weighing them empty and
then filled with deionized distilled water; weigh to the nearest 5 g, and record
the results. Alternatively, measure the volume of water used to fill them to
nearest 5 ml-
-------
Section No.
Date May 31,
Page 13
6. Calculations
3.17.10
1991
All equations are written using absolute pressure; absolute pressures are
determined by adding the measured barometric pressure to the measured gauge or
manometer pressure.
6.1 Nomenclature.
C = TGNMO concentration of the effluent, ppm C equivalent.
Cc = Calculated condensible organic (condensate trap) concentration
of the effluent, ppm C equivalent.
Ccm = Measured concentration {NMO analyzer) for the condensate trap
ICV, ppm C02.
Ct = Calculated noncondensible organic concentration (sample tank)
of the effluent, ppm C equivalent.
Ctm = Measured concentration (NMO analyzer) for the sample tank,
ppm NMO.
F = Sampling flow rate, cc/min.
L = Volume of liquid injected, ul.
M = Molecular weight of the liquid injected, g/g-mole.
mc = TGNMO mass concentration of the effluent, mg C/dsm3.
N = Carbon number of the liquid compound injected (N = 12 for
decane, N = 6 for hexane).
Pf = Final pressure of the intermediate collection vessel, mm Hg
absolute.
Pb = Barometric pressure, cm Hg.
Gas sample tank pressure before sampling, mm Hg absolute.
Gas sample tank pressure after sampling, but before
pressurizing, mm Hg absolute.
Final gas sample tank pressure after pressurizing, mm Hg
absolute.
Final temperature of intermediate collection vessel, °K.
Sample tank temperature before sampling, °K.
Sample tank temperature at completion of sampling, °K.
Ttf = Sample tank temperature after pressurizing, °K.
V = Sample tank volume, m3.
Vt = Sample train volume, cc.
Vv = Intermediate collection vessel volume, m3.
Vs = Gas volume sampled, dsm3.
n = Number of data points.
q = Total number of analyzer injections of intermediate collection
vessel during analysis (where k = injection number, 1 ... q).
r = Total number of analyzer injections of sample tank during
analysis (where j = injection number, 1 ... r).
xx = Individual measurements.
x = Mean value.
P = Density of liquid injected, g/cc.
6 = Leak check period, min.
AP = Allowable pressure change, cm Hg.
• ti
Pt
t f
ti
T
6.2 Allowable Pressure Change.
the allowable pressure change:
For the pretest leak check, calculate
-------
AP = 0.01
Section No. 3.17.10
Date May 31. 1991
Page 14
Eq. 25-1
6.3 Sample Volume. For each test run, calculate the gas volume sampled:
Eq. 25-2
v. = 0.3857 v
t _ * ti
o
6.4 Noncondensible Organics. For each sample tank, determine the
concentration of nonmethane organics (ppm C):
t r
t f
P P
rt rt
T T
1t At
i E ct
r 3=1
Eq. 25-3
6.5 Condensible Organics. For each condensate trap, determine the concentra
tion of organics (ppm C):
Eq. 25-4
-O
; Cc = 0.3857
V*,
1 V C
— /-J
cm,.
k=l
6.6 TGNMO. To determine the TGNMO concentration for each test run, use the
following equation:
c = ct + cc
Eq. 25-5
6.7 TGNMO Mass Concentration. To determine the TGNMO mass
concentration as carbon for each test run, use the following equation:
mc = 0.4993 C
Eq. 25-6
6.8 Percent Recovery. To calculate the percent recovery for the liquid
injections to the condensate recovery and conditioning system use the following
equation:
M vv rf c/cm
Percent recovery = 1.604 —
P T N
Eq. 25-7
O
-------
Section No. 3.17.10
Date May 31, 1991
Page 15
6.9 Relative Standard Deviation.
100 /r(x1 - :
- » n - 1
x
- x)2
RSD = "W Eq. 25-8
7. Bibliography
1. Salo, Albert E., Samuel Witz, and Robert D. MacPhee. Determination of
Solvent Vapor Concentrations by Total Combustion Analysis: A Comparison of
Infrared with Flame lonization Detectors. Paper No. 75~33-2. (Presented at the
68th Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association. Boston,
Massachusetts. June 15-20, 1975.) 14 p.
2. Salo, Albert E., William L. Oaks, and Robert D. MacPhee. Measuring the
Organic Carbon Content of Source Emissions for Air Pollution Control. Paper No.
74-190. (Presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control
Association. Denver, Colorado. June 9-13, 1974.) 25 p.
-------
Section No.
Date May 31,
Page 16
3.17.10
1991
o
REGULATING
VALVE
MANOMETER
DUAL RANGE
ROTAMETER
TEMPERATURE
CONTROLLER
VACUUM PUMP
THERMOCOUPLES
PURGE VALVE
THERMOCOUPLE
ROTAMETER | |
STACK
WALL
SAMPLE
TANK
VALVE
SAMPLE
VALVE
STAINLESS STEEL
FILTER HOLDER
HEATED BOX
CONDENSATE
TRAP
STAINLESS
STEEL PROBE
O
SAMPLE
TANK
Figure 25-1. Sampling train.
O
-------
Section No. 3.17.10
Date May 31, 1991
Page 17
VACUUM PUMP
CONNECTOR
SAMPLE
25.4
1.0
F1BERFAX
INSULATION
DIMENSIONS: HE1
in
3.175
0.125
CONDENSATE
TRAP PROBE
BULKHEAD
CONNECTOR
J
PROBE
NNECTOR
PROBE LINE
THERMOCOUPLE
TO TEMPERATURE
CONTROLLER
a a
FILTER HEAT CONDENSATE
TEMPERATURE TRAP PROBE
CONTROLLER CONNECTOR
THERMOCOUPLE THERMOCOUPLE
Figure 25-2. Out-of-stack filter box.
. \ t_-
-------
Section No.
Date May 31,
Page 18
3.17.10
1991
o
DIMENSIONS:
nrn
in
0.375 0.035
316SS TUBING
31 ess NUT
WALL
O
COARSE QUARTZ
WOOL PACKING
2.25
Figure 25-3. Condensate trap.
O
-------
eftf
Section No. 3-17.10
Date May 31. 1991
Page 19
FLOW METERS
HEATTRACE(100°C)
SAMPLE
RECOVERY
VALVE
FLOW
CONTROL
VALVE
SYRINGE PORT
VACUUM PUMP
Figure 25-4. Condensate recovery system.
-------
Section No. 3.17.10
Date May 31, 1991 S~\
Page 20 (J
CARRIER GAS
CALIBRATION STANDARDS —1>
SAMPLE TANK
i
SAMPLE
INJECTION
LOOP
INTERMEDIATE COLLECTION
<3— VESSEL (CONDmONED
TRAP SAMPLE)
SEPARATION
COLUMN
BACKFLUSH
CO.CH4lC02
NONMETHANE
ORGANICS
OXIDATION
CATALYST
REDUCTION
CATALYST
FLAME
IONIZATION
DETECTOR
HYDROGEN
COMBUSTION
AR
DATA RECORDER
o
Figure 25-5. Simplified schematic of nonmelhane organic (NMO) analyzer.
O
, •)
-------
Section No. 3.17-10
Date May 31, 1991
Page 21
COLUMN OVEN
rOQOOOOOOOOOOOQQQOOOQQQ
REDUCTION
CATALYST
H2 AIR
Figure 25-6. Nonmethane organic (NMO) analyzer.
-------
CONNECTING T
INJECTION
SEPTUM
Section No.
Date May 31,
Page 22
CONNECTING ELBOW
3.17.10
1991
FROM
CARRIER
DIMENSIONS:
o
. TO
CATALYST
O
31 eSS TUBING
Figure 25-7. Liquid sample injection unit.
O
8/89
-------
Section No. 3-17-10
Date May 31, 1991
Page 23
VOLATILE ORGANIC CARBON
FACILITY
LOCATION
DATf
TAWXNUMBfn
SAMPLE IOCAT(OM
OPERATOR
OHM UllUf CO
TBAFWUMBEH «AU»1 f 10 MUMBFH
"V : TAWXVACUUU.
.: mm Hf cm Hf
PRETEST (MANOMETER)
POST TEST (MANOMETER)
ICAUCfJ
(RAUCri
• BAROMETRIC
PRESSURE.
mm Nf
AMBIENT
TIUPtRATURE,
•c
LEAK RATE
cm H| / 10 min
PRETEST.
TIME
CLOCK/SAMPLE
VACUUM
cm H|
flOWMETIR SITTING
COMMENTS
Figure 25-8. Example field data form.
-------
Section No. 3.17.10
Date May 31, 1991
Page 2H
o
FLOW METERS
AIR
HEAT TRACE (100'C)
n
H2OTRAP
4-PORT VALVE
CONDENSATEi
TRAP
FLOW
CONTROL
VALVE
C_DRYICE_^
VENT
SAMPLE
RECOVERY
VALVE
NDIR
ANALYZER
LJ^LJ u-**1—'n' ^ ^<
OXIDATION
REACTOR
SYRINGE PORT
C7
VACUUM PUMP
SAMPLE
TANK
VALVE
SAMPLE
TANK
O
Figure 25-9. Condensate recovery system, CO2 purge.
O
-------
Section No. 3.17-10
Date May 31, 1991
Page 25
FLOW METERS
HEATTRACE(100°C)
SAMPLE
RECOVERY
VALVE
FLOW
CONTROL
VALVE
SYRINGE PORT
VACUUM PUMP
Figure 25-10. Condensate recovery system, collection of trap organics.
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.17.11
Date May 31. 1991
Page 1
11.0 REFERENCES
1. Evaluation of Trap Recovery Design, EMB Project Number 82SFS-1.
2. Preparation of Method 25 Sampling Equipment and Determination of Linit of
Detection of Quantification, EMB Project No. 82SFS-1.
3. Evaluation of Method 25 Condensate Trap Packing Material, EMB Project Number
82SFS-1.
4. Oxidation Catalyst Screening and Evaluation Study, ESED Project Number 82SFS1-4-
2.
5. Quality Control Procedures Evaluation, ESED Project Number 82SFS1-4-3.
6. Condensate Trap Development and Evaluation, ESED Project Number 82SFS1-4-4.
•\
7. Trap Recovery Procedures Evaluation. ESED Project Number 82SFS1-4-5.
8. Evaluation of Particulate Filters, ESED Project Number 82SFS1-5-2.
9. "Procedure for NBS-Traceable Certification of Compressed Gas Working Standards
Used for Calibration and Audit of Continuous Source Emission Monitors (Revised
Traceability Protocol No. 1)," June 1987, Section 3.0.4 of the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume III, Stationary Source
Specific Methods, EPA-600/4-77-027b, August 1977. U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Research and Development Publications, 26 West St. Clair St.,
Cincinnati, OH ^5268.
10. "A Procedure for Establishing Traceability of Gas Mixtures to Certain National
Institute for Standards and Technology Standard Reference Materials," Joint
Publication by NIST and EPA, EPA-600/7-81-010, Available from U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Quality Assurance Division (MD-77). Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.
11. R. S. Wright, C. V. Wall, C. E. Decker, and D. J. von Lehmden, "Accuracy
Assessment of EPA Protocol Gases in 1988," Journal of the Air and Waste
Management Association. 29_ (9): 1225-1227, September 1989.
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No 3.19
Date September 3, 1992
Page 1
Section 3.19
METHOD 101A-DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE AND GASEOUS
MERCURY EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
OUTLINE
Section
SUMMARY
METHOD HIGHLIGHTS
METHOD DESCRIPTION
1. PROCUREMENT OF APPARATUS
AND SUPPLIES
2. CALIBRATION OF APPARATUS
3. PRESAMPLING OPERATIONS
4. ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
5. POSTSAMPLING OPERATIONS
6. CALCULATIONS
7. MAINTENANCE
8. AUDITING PROCEDURE
9. RECOMMENDED STANDARDS FOR
ESTABLISHING TRACEABILITY
10. REFERENCE METHODS
11. REFERENCES
Documentation
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
.19
.19
.19
.19
.19
.19
.19
.19
.19
.19
.19
.19
.19
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.1
.8
.9
.10
.11
Number
of Paaes
1
2
18
25
1
19
29
10
4
4
1
18
2
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No 3.19
Date September 3, 1952
Page 1
SUMMARY
Method 101A, for determining particulate and gaseous mercury (Hg) emissions
from stationary sources, is similar to Method 101. In 101A, however, acidic potassium
permanganate (KMnO<) solution is used for sample collection instead of acidic iodine
monochloride. This method applies to determining particulate and gaseous mercury (Kg)
emissions from sewage sludge incinerators and other sources as specified in the
regulations. Particulate and gaseous Hg emissions are withdrawn isokinetically from
the source and collected in an acidic KMnO4 solution. The collected Hg (in mercuric
form) is reduced to elemental Hg, which is then aerated from the solution into an
optical cell and measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS).
After initial dilution, the range of this method is 20 to 800 ng Hg/mL. The
upper limit can be extended by further dilution of the sample. The sensitivity of the
method depends on the recorder/ spectrophotometer combination selected. The collection
efficiency of the sampling method can be affected by excessive oxidizable matter in the
stack-gas that prematurely depletes the KMn04 solution.
The method descriptions given are based on the method1'2'3 promulgated October
15, 1980, and on corrections and additions published on September 12, 1984, and
September 23, 1988 (Section 3.19.10).
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No 3.19
Date September 3, 1992
Page 1
METHOD HIGHLIGHTS
Section 3.19 describes the procedures and specifications for determining
particulate and gaseous mercury emissions from sewage sludge incinerators and other
stationary sources as specified in the regulations. New procedures were added to
Method 101A3 on the basis of EPA-conducted development and evaluation of mercury
sampling and analysis. The major changes for Method 101A are:
1. The impinger KMnO4 absorbing solution and the 8 N hydrochloric acid
(HCl) rinse are no longer combined in the field during sample recovery.
2. The impinger KMn04 absorbing solution must be filtered.
3. The filtrate must be analyzed within 24 h of filtration.
4. The residue on the filter from the filtration step must be digested .with
8 N HCl.
5. The HCl digestate and the final field sample recovery rinse qf HCl are
combined and analyzed separately from the KMnO4 filtrate. :;
1. Procurement of' Apparatus and Supplies ; ,, . •,,. -,.....
Section 3.19.1 (Procurement of Apparatus and Supplies) gives specifications,
criteria, and design features for the equipment find materials required for'Method 101A.
This section can be used as a guide for procuring and initially checking equipment and
supplies. The activity matrix (Table 1.1) at the end of the section is a summary of
the details given in the text and can be used as a quick reference.
2. Pretest Preparations
Section 3.19.2 (Calibration of Apparatus) describes the required calibration
procedures and considerations for the Method 101A sampling equipment. Required
accuracies for each component also are included. A pretest checklist (Figure 3.1 in
Subsection 3.19.3) or a similar form should be used to summarize the calibration and
other pertinent pretest data. The calibration section may be removed along with the
corresponding sections for the other methods and made into a separate quality assurance
reference manual for personnel involved in calibration activities. : -.
Section 3.19.3 (Presampling Operations) provides testers with a guide for
preparing equipment and supplies for field tests. A pretest preparation form can be
used as an equipment checkout and packing list. Because of the potential for high
blank levels, special attention must be paid to preparing the sampling equipment.
Also, testers must ensure that any required audit samples are obtained for the test by
the responsible regulatory agency.
Activity matrices for calibrating the equipment and the presampling operations
(Tables 2.1 and 3.1) summarize the activities.
3. On-Site Measurements
Section 3.19.4 (On-Site Measurements) contains step-by-step procedures for
sample collection, sample recovery, and sample preparation for transport. The on-site
checklist (Figure 4.3, Section 3.19.4) provides testers with a quick method for
checking the on-site requirements. Table 4.1 provides an activity matrix for all
on-site activities. c -
-------
Section No 3.19
Date September 3, 1992
Page 2
o
4. Posttest Operations
Section 3.19.5 (Posttest Operations) presents the posttest equipment
procedures and a step-by-step analytical procedure for determination of mercury, .
Posttest calibrations are required for the sampling equipment. The posttest operations,
form (Figure 5.9, Section 3.19.5) provides some key parameters that testers and
laboratory personnel must check. The step-by-step sample preparation ,and analytical
procedure descriptions can be removed and made into a separate quality assurance
analytical1reference manual for laboratory personnel.
Section 3.19.6 (Calculations) provides testers with the required equations,
nomenclature, and significant digits. A calculator or computer should be used, if
available, to reduce the chances of error.
Section 3.19.7 (Maintenance) provides testers with a guide for a maintenance
program. This program is not required, but it should reduce equipment malfunctions.
Activity matrices (Tables 5.1, 6.1, and 7.1) summarize all postsampling, calculation,
and maintenance activities.
5. Auditing Procedures
Section 3.19.8 (Auditing Procedure) provides a description of necessary
activities for conducting performance and system audits. The data-processing.*—^
procedures and a checklist for a systems audit also are included in this section/ j
Table 8.1 is an activity matrix for conducting the performance and system audits. \^S
Section 3.19.9 (Recommended Standards for Establishing Traceabi-lity) provides
the primary standard to which the analytical data should be traceable.
6. References
Section 3.19.10 contains the promulgated Method 101A; Section 3.19.11 contains
the references cited throughout the text.
O
-------
Section No. 3.19.1
Date September J, 1992
Page 1
1.0 PROCUREMENT OP APPARATUS AND SUPPLIES
Before Method 101A can yield results, it must be employed accurately.
Consequently, all users are advised to read this document and to adopt its procedures.
Alternative procedures should be employed only if they are outlined herein.
This section describes equipment specif ications/'briteria, and design features
for the sampling train used for Method 101A. It is intended to help users with
equipment.selection. A schematic of the sampling train is shown in Figure 1.1 as an
aid in the discussion that follows.
This section also describes procedures and limits, where applicable, for
acceptance checks. Calibration data generated by the acceptance checks should be
recorded in the calibration log book.
When procuring equipment and supplies, users should record the descriptive
title of the equipment, identification number (if applicable), and the results cf
acceptance checks in a procurement log. .._ ,
The following procedures and descriptions are provided only as guidance and
may not be required for the initial ordering and check-out of the equipment ar.d
supplies. Testers should note, however, that many of these procedures are required at
a later step in the sampling and analytical procedures. Instituting these or similar
procedures as routine practices for checking new equipment and supplies, therefore,
will prevent later problems and/or delays in test programs. At the end of this
section, Table 1.1 provides a summary of quality assurance activities for procurement
and acceptance of apparatus and supplies.
1.1 Sampling :
The sampling train shown in Figure 1.1 is similar to the Method 5 train
(Method 5 refers to 40 CFR Part 60). The Method 101A sampling train consists of the
following components:
1.1.1 Nozzle—The nozzle shall be made of nickel, nickel-plated stainless-steel,
quartz, or borosilicate glass. The tapered angle should be <30°, with taper on the
outside to preserve a constant inside diameter (ID). • . . :.
A range of nozzle ID's-for example, 0.3,2 to 1.27 cm (0.125 to 0.5 in.)-in
increments of 0.16 cm (0.0625 in.) should be available for isokinetic sampling. Larger
nozzle sizes may be required if very low flows are encountered.
Upon receipt of the nozzle(s) from the manufacturer, users should inspect it
for roundness, for the proper material, and for damage to the tapered edge (nicks,
dents, and burrs). Check the diameter with a micrometer; calibration procedures are
described in Section 3.18.2. A slight variation from exact sizes is normal. Engrave
each nozzle with an identification number for inventory and calibration purposes. See
Section 3.18.3 for proper cleaning procedures.
-------
HEATED AREA
TEMPERATURE
SENSOR
PROBE
THERMOMETER
\ FILTER HOLDER
T (OPTIONAL) THERMOMETER
CHECK
VALVE
TYPE S
PITOT TUBE
PITOT MANOMETER
IMPINGERS
THERMOMETERS
TEMPERATURE SENSOR
BY-PASS VALVE
f
PROBE
CJ>
1
PITOT TUBE
ICE BATH
MAIN
VALVE
/
VACUUM
GAUGE
»o o w
DI p> ro
(Q rr o
(0 0> rr
KJ tn o
VACUUM »z
(0 o
DRY G
METER
AIR TIGHT
PUMP
LINE
U)
.
to
o
Figure 1.1. Schematic of Met]wd 101A sampling train.
10
U3
to
O
-------
Section No. 3.19.1
Date September 3, 1992
Page 3
.1.2 Pi tot Tube-The pitot tube, preferably of Type S design, should meet the
requirements of Method 2, Section 3.1.2 of this Handbook. The pitot tube is attached
to the probe as shown in Figure 1.1. The proper pitot-tube/sampling-nozzle
configuration to prevent aerodynamic interference is shown in figures 2.6 and 2.7 of
Method 2, Section 3.1.2 of this Handbook.
The pitot tube should be inspected visually for both vertical and horizontal
tip alignments. If the tube is purchased as an integral part of a probe assembly,
check the dimensional clearances using figures 2.6 and 2.7 (of Method 2, Section
3.1.2). Repair or return any pitot tube that does not meet specifications. The
calibration procedure for a pitot tube is covered in Section 3.4.2 of this Handbook.
1.1.3 Differential Pressure AP-The differential pressure gauge should be an inclined
manometer or the equivalent, as specified in Method 2, Section 3.1.2 of this Handbook.
Two gauges are required. One is used to monitor the stack velocity pressure, whereas
the other is used to measure the orifice pressure differential.
Initially, check the gauge against a gauge-oil manometer at a minimum of three
points: 0.64 mm (0.025 in.); 12.7 mm (0.5 in.); and 25.4 mm (1.0 in.) H20. The gauge
should read within 5% of the gauge-oil manometer at each test point. Repair or return
to the supplier any gauge that does not meet these requirements.
1.1.4 Probe Liner—The probe liner is made of borosilicate or quartz glass tubing.
(Note: Do not use metal probe liners.) If a filter is used ahead of the impingers,
testers must use the probe heating system to minimize the condensation of gaseous Hg.
A heating system is required that will maintain an exit gas temperature of 120 ± 14 °C
k(248 ± 25 °F) during sampling. Other temperatures may be specified by a subpart of the
egulations and must be approved by the Administrator for a particular application.
ecause the actual probe outlet temperature is not usually monitored during sampling,
probes constructed in accordance to APTD-0581 and calibrated according to procedures
in APTD-0576 will be acceptable.
Either borosilicate or quartz glass liners may be used for stack temperatures
up to about 480 °C (900 °F), but quartz glass liners must be used from 480 to 900 °C
(900 to 1650 °F). Either type of liner may be used at higher temperatures for short
periods, with Administrator approval. However, the absolute upper limits—the softening
temperatures of 820 °C (1508 °F) and 1500 °C (2732 °F)-for borosilicate and quartz,
respectively, must be observed.
Upon receiving a new probe, users should check it visually to see whether it
is the length and composition ordered. The probe also should be checked visually for
breaks or cracks, and it should be checked for leaks on a sampling train (Figure 1.1).
Leak checks should include a proper nozzle-to-probe connection with a Viton O-ring,
Teflon® ferrules, or asbestos string.
The probe heating system should be checked as follows:
1. With a nozzle attached, connect the probe outlet to the inlet of the
metering system.
2. Connect the probe heater to an outlet and turn it on for 2 or 3 min.
The probe should become warm to the touch.
3. Start the pump and adjust the needle valve until it indicates a flow
rate of about 0.02 mVmin (0.75 ftVmin) .
4. Be sure the probe remains warm to the touch; the heater should be
capable of maintaining an exit air temperature of 100 °C (212 ^F)
minimum. Failure indicates that the probe should be repaired, returned
to the supplier, or rejected.
-------
Section No. 3.19.1
Date September 3, 1992
Page 4
1.1.5 Filter Holder (Optional;-The filter holders should be made of borosilicate
glass with a rigid, stainless-steel wire-screen filter support. Do not use glass frit
supports. A silicone rubber or Teflon gasket is essential to provide a positive seal
against leakage from outside or around the filter. Upon receipt, assemble the filter
holder with a filter and conduct a leak check. There should be no leak at a vacuum of
15 in. of Hg.
1.1.6 Impingers-Four Greenburg-Smith impingers must be connected in series with
leak-free, ground glass fittings or any similar leak-free, noncontaminating fittings.
For the first, third, and fourth impingers, testers may use impingers that are modified
by replacing the tip with a 13-mm ID (0.5 in.) glass tube extending to 13 mm (0.5 in.)
from the bottom of the flask. The connecting fittings should form leak-free,
vacuum-tight seals. See Section 3.19.3 for proper cleaning procedures.
Upon receipt of a standard Greenburg-Smith impinger, users should fill the
inner tube with water. If the water does not drain through the orifice in 6 to 8 s or
less, the impinger tip should be replaced or enlarged to prevent an excessive pressure
drop in the sampling system. Each impinger should be checked visually for damage:
.breaks, cracks, or manufacturing flaws, such as poorly shaped connections.
1.1.7 Acid Trap-The acid trap should be a Min~e Safety Appliances™ airline filter,
catalog number 81857, with acid absorbing cartridge and suitable connections, or the
equivalent. Upon receipt, check the part number to ensure the part is correct.
1.1.8 Filter Heating System-Any heating system may be used that is capable of
maintaining the filter holder at 120 ± 14 °C (248 ± 25 °F) during sampling. Other
temperatures may be specified by a subpart- of the regulations or approved by the
Administrator for a particular application. A gauge capable of measuring temperatures
to within 3 °C (5.4 °F) should be provided to monitor the temperature around the filter
during sampling.
Before sampling, the heating system and the temperature monitoring device
should be checked. For convenience, the heating element should be easily replaceable
should a malfunction occur during sampling.
1.1.9 Metering System-The metering system should consist of a vacuum gauge, a vacuum
pump, thermometers capable of measuring ±3 °C (5.4 °F) of true value in the range of
0 to 90 °C (32 to 194 °F) , a dry-gas meter with 2% accuracy at the required sampling
rate, and related equipment as shown in Figure 1.1. Other systems capable of
maintaining metering rates within 10% of the isokinetic sampling rate and of
determining sample volumes to within 2% of the isokinetic rate may be used if approved
by the Administrator. Sampling trains with metering systems designed for sampling
rates higher than those described in APTD-0581 and APTD-0576 may be used if the above
specifications can be met. When the metering system is used with a pitot tube, it
should permit verification of an isokinetic sampling rate through the use of a
nomograph or by calculation.
Upon receipt or after construction of the system, users should perform both
positive and negative pressure leak checks before beginning the system calibration
procedure described in Subsection 2.1 of Section 3.19.2. Any leakage requires repair
or replacement of the malfunctioning item.
i
1.1.10 Barometer—A mercury, aneroid, or other barometer capable of measuring
atmospheric pressure to within ± 2.5 mm (0.1 in.) Hg is required.
A preliminary check of a new barometer should be made against a
mercury-in-glass barometer or the equivalent. In lieu of a barometer check, the
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.19.1
Date September 3, 1992
Page 5
absolute barometric pressure may be obtained from .a nearby weather service station and
adjusted for elevation difference between the station and the sampling point. Either
subtract 2.5 mm Hg/30 m (0.1 in. Hg/100 ft) from the station value for an elevation
increase, or add the same for an elevation decrease. If the barometer cannot be
adjusted to within 2.5 mm {0.1 in.) Hg of the reference barometric pressure, it should
be returned to the manufacturer or rejected.
1.1.11 Gas Density Determination Equipment—& temperature sensor and a pressure gauge
are required as described in Method 2 (Section 3.1.2 of this Handbook). Additionally,
a gas analyzer as described by Method 3 may be required. The temperature sensor should
be permanently attached to either the probe or the pitot tube. In either case, it is
recommended that a fixed configuration (Figure 1.1) be maintained. The sensor also may
be attached just prior to field use, as described in Section 3.19.2.
1.2 Sample Recovery
1.2.1 Glass Sample Bottles Sample bottles should be 1000- and 100-mL without leaks
and with Teflon-lined caps. Upon receipt, check visually for cracks in the glass.
Ensure that the cap liners are Teflon, because other material can result in sample
contamination and reaction with the KMnO«. Beca~use of the potential reaction of the
04 with the acid, there may be pressure buildup in the sample storage bottles.
enting is highly recommended. A No. 70-72 hole drilled in the container cap and
Teflon liner has been found to allow adequate venting without loss of sample.
1.2.2 Graduated Cylinder—A 250-mL cylinder is required.
1.2.3 Funnel and Rubber Policeman—These items are used to aid in transferring silica
gel to containers; they are not necessary if silica gel is weighed in the field.
1.2.4 Funnel—A glass funnel is needed to aid in sample recovery.
1.3 Sample Preparation and Hg Analysis
1.3.1 Volumetric Pipets-Class A 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 10-, and 20-mL pipets are
required.
1.3.2 Graduated Cylinder—A 25-mL cylinder is required.
1.3.3 Steam Bath-Refers to 40 CFR, Part 60, Appendix B, Method 101A.
1.3.4 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer—Any atomic absorption unit is suitable,
provided it has an open sample presentation area in which to mount the optical cell.
Follow the instrument settings recommended by the manufacturer. Instruments designed
specifically for measuring mercury using the cold-vapor technique are commercially
available and may be substituted for the atomic absorption spectrophotometer.
1.3.5 Optical Cell—The optical cell should be of cylindrical shape, with quartz end
windows and having the dimensions shown in Figure 1.2. Wind the cell with
approximately 2 m of 24-gauge nichrome heating wire, and wrap with fiberglass
insulation tape or the equivalent; do not let the wires touch each other. A heat lamp
mounted above the cell or a moisture trap installed upstream of the cell may be used
as alternatives. Upon receipt, check the dimensions and the capability of the heating
system.
-------
Section No. 3.19.1
Date September 3, 195
Page 6
o
1.3.6 Aeration Cell—The aeration cell should be constructed according to the
specifications in Figure 1.3. Do not use a glass frit as a substitute for the blowr.
glass bubbler tip shown in Figure 1.3.
1.3.7 Recorder--The recorder must be matched to the output of the spectrophotometer
described above. As an alternative, an integrator may be used to determine peak area
or peak height.
1.3.8 Variable Transformer-This item is needed to vary the voltage on the optical
cell from 0 to 40 volts.
1.3.9 Hood-A hood i's-) required for venting the optical cell exhaust.
1.3.10 Flow Metering Valve-Refers to 40 CFR,.. Part 60, Appendix B, Method 101A.
1.3.11 Flow Meter—A rotameter, or equivalent, is required that is capable cf
measuring a gas flow of 1.5 L/min. Upon receipt, calibrate the flow meter at a flow
rate of 1.5 L/min with a bubble meter or wet-test meter.
1.3.12 Aeration Gas Cylinder-The cylinder mustncontain nitrogen or dry, Hg-free air
and must be equipped with a single-stage regulator.
O
-o
-------
Section No. 3.19.1
Date September 3, 1992
Page 7
18/9 FEMALE BALL SOCKET
LENGTH NECESSARY TO FIT SOLUTION CELL
TO SPECTROPHOTOMETER
(END VIEW)
TO VARIABLE TRANSFORMER
VENT TO HOOD
4
9-mm 00
9-mm OD ,•£*& 2JS em
3.81 em DIAMETER
QUARTZ WINDOWS
AT EACH END
(FRONT VIEW)
NOTES:
CELL WOUND WITH 24-GAUGE NICHROME WIRE
TOLERANCES ± 5 PERCENT
Figure 1.2. Optical cell.
-------
Section No. 3.19.1
Date September 3, 1992
Page 8
o
FROM TANK
1 /"T"V 1B/B MALE BALL JOINT
T(r—7T 4-mmDORE TEFLON STOPCOCK
I IT innnnien _/ "^^
10/72 GROUND
10/22 GROUND
CLASS JOINT
WITH STOPPER
TO
OPTICAL CELL
18/8 MALE OALL JOINT
ALL DIMENSIONS IN em
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
BLOWN GLASS BUMUIR COTTU POBT\ON
AH-ROX. &0 by 1.0 em 4.0-«m OD by 3.C-cm ID
O
o
Figure 1.3. Aeration cell.
-------
Section No. 3.19 .1
Date September 3, 1992
Page 9
1.3.13 TuJbing-The tubing is required for connections. Use glass tubing (ungreased
ball and socket connections are recommended) for all connections between the solution
cell and the optical cell; do not use Tygon tubing, other types of flexible tubing, or
metal tubing as substitutes. Testers may use Teflon, steel, or copper tubing between
the nitrogen tank and the flow meter valve (Section 5.3.7), and Tygon, gum, or rubber
tubing between the flow meter valve and the aeration cell.
1.3.14 Flow Rate Calibration Equipment—This equipment consists of a bubble flow meter
or a wet-test meter for measuring a gas flow rate of 1.5 ± 0.1 L/min.
1.3.15 Volumetric Flasks—These flasks must be Class A, with pennyhead standard taper
stoppers; the required sizes are 100-, 250-, 500-, and 1000-mL.
1.3.16 Volumetric Pipets—These pipets must be Class A; the required sizes are 1-, 2-,
3-, 4-, and 5-mL.
1.3.17 Graduated Cylinder- A 50-mL cylinder is required.
1.3.18 Magnetic Starrer— A general purpose laboratory-type stirrer is required.
-i
1.3.19 .Magnetic Stirring Bar— A Teflon-coated stirring bar is required.
1.3.20 Trip Balance— A trip balance capable of weighing to ± 0.5 g is required. Upon
receipt, check balance with standard weights.
1.3.21 Analytical Balance-An analytical balance capable of weighing up to ± 0.5 me
is required. Upon receipt, check balance with standard weights.
1.4 Alternative Analytical Apparatus
If any alternative analytical apparatus is to be used, it must pass the
performance criteria described in Section 3.19.5.5. Alternative Hg cold-vapor
analytical systems are available commercially from most atomic absorption manufacturers
and employ automated flow-injection techniques. Such systems automatically inject
sample solutions into continuous reagent streams containing the reducing reagent.
Mercury is usually measured as a solution concentration (e.g., mg Hg/L). An example
of a typical cold-vapor AA instrument using flow injection is shown in Figure 1.4.
Such systems are allowable as long as they meet the following criteria:
1.4.1 Calibration Curve Linearity—The system must generate a linear calibration
curve, and two consecutive samples of the same aliquot size and concentration must
agree within 3% of their average.
-------
oooo
oooo
oooo
oooo
Autosampler
Multichannel Pump
Inert Gas
Dilute HC1
Sample
H2S04
Reducing Reagent
Mixing Colls
Spectrophotometer w/ Optical Cell
Gas/Liquid Separator
To Vent
To Waste
Figure 1.4. Typical cold Vapor AA instrumentation using flow injection.
O O
•o O 0
o-O P
U) U)
vo
to
o
-------
Section No. 3.19.1
'- • Date September 3, 1992
'•' Page 11
1.4.2 Spike flecovery-The system must allow for recovery of a minimum of 95% of the
spike when an aliquot of a source sample is spiked with a known concentration of Hg
(II) compound.
1.5 Reagents
1.5.1 Sampling and Sample .Recovery-Use ACS reagent-grade chemicals or the
equivalent, unless otherwise specified. The following reagents are used in sampling
and recovery: -----
Water—Deionized distilled, , meeting ^ASTM specifications for Type I Reagent
Water—ASTM Test Method D 1193-77. If high concentrations'of organic matter are not
expected to be present, users may eliminate the KMnO< test for oxidizable organic
matter. Use this water in all dilutions and solution preparations.
Nitric Acid (HNO3), 50% (v/v)-Mix-equal volumes of concentrated HNO3 and water,
being careful to add the acid to the water slowly.
Silica Gel—Indicating type, 6- to 16-mesh. If previously used, dry at 175 °C
(350 °F) for 2 h. Testers may use new silica gel .as received.
Filter (Optional)—Glass fiber filter, without organic binder, exhibiting at
least 99.95% efficiency on 0.3-Hm dioctyl phthalate smoke particles. Testers may use
the filter in cases where the gas stream contains large quantities of particulate
matter, but they should analyze blank filters for Hg content.
Sulfuric Acid (H2SO4), 10% (v/v;-Slowly add 100 mL of concentrated H2SO< to 500
mL of water and mix cautiously.
Absorbing Solution, 4% KMnO, (w/v)— Prepare fresh daily. Dissolve 40 g of KMn04
in sufficient 10% H2SO4 to make 1 L. Prepare and store in glass bottles to prevent
degradation.
Caution: To prevent autocatalytic decomposition of the permanganate solution, filter
it through Whatman" 541 filter paper. In addition, owing to the reaction of the KKnO,
with the acid, there may be pressure buildup in the sample storage bottle. These
bottles should not be filled to capacity and should be vented, both to relieve excess
pressure and to prevent explosion of the container: A No. 70-72 hole drilled in the
container cap and Teflon liner is recommended.
Hydrochloric Acid-Trace metals grade HC1 is recommended. If other grades sre
used, the Hg level must be less than 3 ng/mL Hg. Upon receipt, check manufacturer's
guarantee or analyze the acid for background contamination.
Hydrochloric Acid, 8 AHDilute 67 mL of concentrated HC1 to 100 mL with water
(slowly add the HC1 to the water).
-------
Section No. 3.19.1
Date September 3, 1992
Page 12
1.5.2 Analysis—The reagents needed for analysis are listed below:
Tin (II) Solution—Prepare fresh daily and keep sealed when not being used.
Completely dissolve 20 g of tin (II) chloride [or 25 g of tin (II) sulfate] crystals
(Baker™ Analyzed reagent grade or any other brand that will give a clear solution) in
25 mL of concentrated HC1. Dilute to 250 mL with water. Do not substitute HN03, H2SO4,
or other strong acids for the HC1.
Sodium Chloride-tfydroxyl&mine Solution-Dissolve 12 g of sodium chloride and
12 g of hydroxylamine sulfate (or 12 g of hydroxylamine hydrochloride) in water and
dilute to 100 mL.
Hydrochloric Acid, 8 AMDilute 67 mL of concentrated HC1 to 100 mL with water
(slowly add the HCl to the water).
Nitric Acid, 15% (v/v)— Dilute 15 mL of concentrated HN03 to 100 mL with water.
Mercury Stock Solution, 1 mg Hg/mL-Prepare'and store all Hg standard solutions
in borosilicate glass containers. Completely dissolve 0.1354 g of Hg (II) chloride in
75 mL of water. Add 10 mL of concentrated HN03-~and adjust the volume to exactly 100
mL with water. Mix thoroughly. This solution is stable for at least 1 month.
Intermediate Hg Standard Solution, 10 ug/mL—Prepare fresh weekly. Pipet 5.0
mL of the Hg stock solution (Section 6.2.5) into a 500-mL volumetric flask, and add 20
mL of 15% HNO, solution. Adjust the volume to exactly 500 mL with water. Thoroughly
mix the solution.
Working Hg Standard Solution, 200 ng Jfg/mL—Prepare fresh daily. Pipet 5.0 mL
from the Intermediate Hg Standard Solution (Section 6.2.6) into a 250-mL volumetric
flask. Add 5 mL of 4% KMnO< absorbing solution and 5 mL of 15% HNOj. Adjust the volume
to exactly 250 mL with water. Mix thoroughly.
Potassium Permanganate, 5* (w/v)—Dissolve 5 g of KMn04 in water and dilute to
100 mL.
Filter-Use a Whatman 40, or equivalent.
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.19.1
Date September 3, 1992
Page 13
TABLE 1.1 ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR PROCUREMENT OF APPARATUS AND SUPPLIES
Apparatus
|Acceptance limits
I Frequency & method
I of measurement
I Action if
requirements
are not met
Sampling
Probe liner
V ,
I
(specified material
|of construction;
|equipped with
(heating system
|capable of
(maintaining 120 °C
|± 14°C (248 °C ±
125 °F) at the exit
1
(Visually check and
(run the heating
(system
I
Repair,
return to
supplier, or
reject
Probe
nozzle
(Nickel, nickel-
|plated stainless-
|steel, quartz, or
(borosilicate
(glass, tapered <
(30°; difference in
(measured diameter
|< 0.1 mm (0.004
I in.); no nicks,
(dents, or
(corrosion
I(Subsec. 1.1.2)
I ____
(Visually check
(before each test;
(use a micrometer to
(measure ID before
|field use; after
|each repair
I
I
Reshape and
sharpen,
return to"
the supplier,
or reject
Pi tot tube
(Type S (Sec.
3.1.2); attached
to probe with im-
pact (high press-
ure) opening plane
even with or above
nozzle entry plane
(Visually check for.
(both vertical and
(horizontal tip
(alignments;
(calibrated according
to Sec. 3.4.2
Repair or
return to
supplier
Differ-
ential *
pressure
gauge
Meets criteria
(Sec. 3.1.2);
agree, within 5%
of gauge-oil
manometer
(Check against a
(gauge-oil manometer
(at a minimum of 3
(points; 0.64
I(0.025); 12.7 (0.5);
(25.4 (1.0) ram (in)
JH20
I
Repair or
return to
supplier
Vacuum
gauge
0-760 mm (0-30
in.) Hg, ± 25 mm
((1 in.) at 380 mm
(in.) Hg
|Check against
(mercury U-tube
(manometer upon
|receipt
Adjust or
return to
supplier
(Continued)
-------
Section No. 3 .19.1
Date September 3. 1992 S~*\
Page 14 ( )
TABLE 1.1 (Continued)
Apparatus
Vacuum pump
Orifice
meter
Impingers
Filter
holder
(optional)
Filter
support
Filter
heating
system
Dry-gas
meter
|
1
(Acceptance limits
1
(Leak free; capable
|of maintaining a
| flow rate of
JO. 02 - 0.03 mVmin
j (0._66 to 1.1
(ftVmin) for pump
| inlet vacuum of
380 mm (15 in.) Hg
1
|AH@ of 46.74 ±
J6.35 mm (1.84 ±
J0.25 in.) H20 at
J68 °F (not
(mandatory)
Four Greenburg-
| Smith connected in
|a series, leak-
|free, noncontamin-
ating fittings
Leak-free;
jborosilicate glass
1
(Rigid stainless-
| steel wire screen
| Capable of
(maintaining filter
(holder at
temperature of
120 °C ± 14 °C
(248 °F ± 25°F)
Capable of
measuring volume
within 2% at a
flow rate of
0.02 mVmin
(0.75 ftVmin)
Frequency & method
of measurement
Check upon receipt
for leaks and
capacity
Upon receipt,
visually check for
damage and calibrate
against wet-test
meter .-,—
'. -
Visually check upon
receipt; check
pressure drop
(Subsec. 1.1.6)
Visually check
before use; conduct
leak check
Visually check upon
receipt, conduct
leak check
Visually check upon
receipt and run
heating system
checkout
Check for damage
upon receipt and
calibrate (Sec.
3.4.2) against
wet-test meter
Action if
requirements
are not met
Repair or
return to
supplier
Repair, if
possible,
otherwise
return to
supplier
Return to
supplier
As above
Repair or
return to
manufacturer
1
| Repair or
return to
| manufacturer
1
1
(Reject if
(damaged,
(behaves
erratically,
| or cannot be
(properly
adjusted t i
o
o
(Continued)
-------
TABLE 1.1 (Continued)
Section No. 3.19.1
Date September 3, 1992
Page 15
Apparatus
(Acceptance limits
Frequency & method
of measurement
(Action if
requirements
are not met
Acid Trap
(Mine Safety Appli-
|,ances air line
[filter acid ab-
|sorbing cartridge
Visually check upon
receipt
Return to
supplier
Thermo-
meters
|± 1 °C (2 °F) of
|true value in the
|range of 0 to
J25 °C (32 to
|77 °F) for impin-
|ger thermometer
land ± 3 °C
1(5.4 °F) of true
lvalue in the range
(of 0 to 90 °C
I (32 to 194 °F) for
|dry-gas meter
I thermometers
Check upon receipt
for dents or bent
stem, and calibrate
(Sec. 3.4.2) against
mercury-in-glass
thermometer
Reject if
unable to
calibrate
Barometer
(Capable of
(measuring
|atmospheric
(pressure within
(2.5 mm (0.1 in.)
JHg :
Check against a
mercury-in-glass
barometer or
equivalent ;••
calibrate
(Sec. 3.1.2)
Determine;
correction
factor, or
reject if
(difference
(more than
± 2.5 mm.
(0.1 in.) Hg
Gas density
determi-
nation
equipment
(Meet the
|requirements in
Sec. 3.2.1
Conduct checks shown
in Sec. 3.2.1,
upon receipt
Repair, ...-'"
replace, or
return to
supplier
Sample
Recovery
Glass
sample
bottles
(Leak-free, Tef-
|Ion lined caps,
1000 and 100 mL
Visually.check upon
receipt for cracks,
ensure that caps are
Teflon
Replace, or
return to. }
supplier
(Continued)
-------
Section No. 3 .19.1
Date September 3, 1992
Page 16
o
TABLE 1.1 (Continued)
Apparatus
Sample
Preparation
and
Analysis
Glassware
AA spec-
trometer
Recorder or
electronic
integrator
Optical
cell
Aeration
cell
Moisture
removal
system
Acceptance limits
. .' r
' ' •*
"• ,"'.
Class A
Suitable optical
resolution system
and detector
See owner's manual
."•'
See Figure 1.2
. •
See Figure 1.3
.
Heated cell or
moisture trap
to remove
condensation
'
Frequency & method
of measurement -
Visually check upon
receipt
Perform appropriate
calibrations
according to Sec. 5
'_
Upon receipt, check
"
Upon receipt, check
to ensure correct
dimensions, check
heating system
Visually check
Calibrate whenever
system is turned on
Action if
requirements
are not met
.
Replace or
return to
supplier
Return to
manufacturer
or repair and
re-check
Repair or
return to
manufacturer
Return, to
manufacturer ,
clean as
needed
1
Repair or
return to
manufacturer
[Calibrate
| heated cell
|or change
desiccant
Flowmeter
Capable of
measuring flow
of 1.5 L/min
(Calibrate with
|bubble meter or
|wet-test meter
|upon receipt
|Return to
| manufacturer
| or repair and.
I recalibrate
O
system
Regulator
to remove
condensation
from ,optical cell
Proper fittings
and pressure
control
|or change
| desiccant
1
Upon receipt, | Return to
attach to cylinder (manufacturer,
and check | repair,
j or replace
| fitting and
| re-check
!
O
(Continued)
-------
Section No. 3.19.1
Date September 3, 1992
Page 17
TABLE 1.1 (Continued)
Apparatus
Variable
transformer
Aeration
gas
cylinder
Tubing
Trip
balance
Analytical
balance
)
'Alternative
analytical
apparatus
Sampling
and
Sample
Recovery
Reagents
1
1
| Acceptance limits
1
(Capable of varying
(voltage from 0 to
(40 volts
1
(Nitrogen or dry,
|Hg-free air equip-
(ped with regulator
1
(See Sec. 1.3.13
(for specifications
(of tubing for the
| connections
1
(Capable of
(measuring within
|0.5 g
1
(Capable of weigh-
( ing to ± 0.5 mg
1
(Capable of gene-
| rating a linear
(calibration curve;
(two consecutive
(samples of equal
(size and concen-
tration agree ± 3%
(of average; and S
| 95% recovery of
| known concentra-
tion of spiked
| sample
I
1
1
| ACS reagent grade
| or Hg blank level
| specified
Frequency & method
of measurement
Visually check
upon receipt
Visually check
upon receipt
Visually check to
ensure proper type
tubing
Check with standard
weights upon receipt
and before each use
As above
See owner ' s manual
Visually check upon
receipt or conduct
Hg analysis
Action if
requirements
are not met
Return to
manufacturer
or repair
Return to
supplier
Replace
Replace or
return to
manufacturer
As above
Return to
supplier
Return to
supplier or
replace
(Continued)
-------
Section No. 3.19,
Date September 3,
Page 18
1952
TABLE 1.1 (Continued)
o
Apparatus
Water
Silica gel
Filter
(optional)
Analysis
Reagents
Filter
1
1
| Acceptance limits
1
(Deionized, dis-
| tilled meeting
IASTM 01193-77
I specifications
1
(indicating type,
| 6- to 16-mesh
1
(Glass fiber with-
|out organic bin-
(der; 99.95% col-
| lection efficiency
(for 0.3 urn dioctyl
Iphthalate smoke
| particles
1
(ACS reagent grade
(or equivalent;
(prepared as
(described in
(Sec. 1.5.3
1
1
1
(Whatman 40
| or equivalent
1
1
1
(Frequency & method
(of measurement
1
(check each lot or
(specify type when
(ordering
1
1
(Upon receipt, check
| label for grade
(or certification
1
| Manufacturer ' s gua-
(rantee that filters
(were tested accord-
| ing to -ASTM D 2986-
(71; observe under
(light for defects
1
1
1
(Upon receipt, check
| label for grade or
(certification; Check
(stability of
(prepared solution
(and prepare when
(necessary
1
(Upon receipt, check
| label for grade
1
Action if
requirements
are not met
Replace or
return to
supplier
Return to
supplier
Return to
supplier
Replace or
return to
supplier
Replace or
return to
supplier
O
o
-------
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3, 1992
Page 1
2.0
CALIBRATION OF APPARATUS
Calibrating the apparatus is one of the more important functions in
maintaining data quality. The detailed calibration procedures for the sampling
apparatus included in this section were designed for the sampling equipment specified
in Method 5 and described in the previous section. Calibrating the analytical
equipment is described in Section 3.19.5, which details the analytical procedures.
Table 2.1, at the end of this section, summarizes the quality assurance (QA) functions
for the calibrations. All calibrations, including those performed on the analytical
equipment} should 'be recorded on standardized forms and retained in a calibration log
book.
2.1
Metering System
The dry-gas meter (DGM) in the sampling system's meter console must be
calibrated against a primary standard meter (wet-test meter or spirometer). An
alternate procedure is to calibrate against a second reference meter (dry-gas meter or
critical orifice) that has been calibrated against a primary standard meter.
2.1.1 Wet-Test Meter—Wet-test meters are calibrated by the manufacturer to an
accuracy of ± 0.5%. The calibration must be checked initially upon receipt and yearly
thereafter. A wet-test meter with a capacity of 3.4vm3/h (120 ft3/h) or 30 L/revolution
(1 ftVrev) will be needed to calibrate the dry-gas meter. For large wet-test meters
(>30 L/rev), there is no convenient method for checking the calibration; consequently,
several methods are suggested, and other methods may be approved by the Administrator.
The initial calibration may be checked by any of the following methods:
1. Certification from the manufacturer that the wet-test meter is withir.
1% of true value at the wet-test meter discharge, so that only a leak
check of the system is then required.
2. Calibration by any primary-air or liquid-displacement method that
displaces at least one complete revolution of the wet-test meter.
3. Comparison against a smaller wet-test meter that has previously beer.
calibrated against a primary-air or liquid-displacement method, as
described in Section 3.5.2 of this Handbook.
4. Comparison against a dry-gas meter that has previously been calibrated
against a primary-air or liquid-displacement method.
The test-meter calibration should be checked annually. The calibration check
can be made by the same method as that of the original calibration; however, the
comparison method need not be recalibrated if the calibration check is within 1% of the
true value. When this agreement is not obtained, the comparison method or wet-test
meter must be recalibrated against a primary-air or liquid-displacement method.
2.1.2 Dry-Gas Meter as a Calibration Standard—A DGM may be used as a calibration
standard for volume measurements in place of the wet-test meter specified in Section
5.3 of Method 5, provided that it is calibrated initially and recalibrated periodically
as follows:
Standard Dry-Gas Meter Calibration—The DGM to be calibrated and used as a
secondary reference meter should be of high quality and should have appropriate
capacity (e.g., 3 L/rev [0.1 ftVrev] ) . A spirometer (400 L or more capacity), or
equivalent, may be used for this calibration, although a wet-test meter is usually more
practical. The wet-test meter should have a capacity of 30 L/rev (1 ftVrev) and
should be capable of measuring volume to within 1.0%. Wet-test meters should be
-------
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3, 19
Page 2
o
checked against a spirometer or a liquid displacement meter to ensure accuracy.
Spire-meters or wet-test meters of other sizes may be used, provided that the specified
accuracies of the procedure are maintained. The initial calibration may be checked by
any of the following methods:
1. Set up the components as shown in Figure 2.1. A spirometer, or
equivalent, may be used in place of the wet-test meter in the system.
2. Run the pump for at least 5 min at a flow rate of about 10 L/min (0.35
cfm) to condition the interior surface of the wet-test meter. The
pressure drop indicated by the manometer at the inlet side of the DGM
should be minimized (no greater than 100 mm H2O [4 in. H20] at a flow
rate of 30 L/min [1 cfm]). Using large diameter tubing connections and
straight pipe fittings will accomplish this minimization.
3. Collect the data as shown in the example data sheet (see Figure 2.2).
Make triplicate runs at each of the flow rates and at no less than five
different flow rates. The range of flow rates should be between 10 and
34 L/min (0.35 and 1.2 cfm) or over the expected operating range.
4. Calculate flow rate, Q, for each run using the wet-test meter volume
(Equation 2-1), Vu, and the run time, 9. Calculate the DGM coefficient
(Equation 2-2), Yd., for each run. These calculations are as follows:
~T—
P V
* bar w • -
Q = KI Equation 2-1
(ttt + t8td) 6
(tds + t6td) Pt
O
Equation 2-2
Vdfi (tw + tetd) (Pbar * Ap/13.6)
where :
Kj = 0.3858 for international system of units (SI); 17.64 for English
units.
Vw = Wet-test meter volume, liter (ft3).
Vds = Dry-gas meter volume, liter (ft3) .
tda = Average dry-gas meter temperature, °C (°F) .
tatd = 273 °C for SI units; 460 °F for English units.
tw = Average wet-test meter temperature, °C (°F) .
Pbir = Barometric pressure, mm Hg (in. Hg) .
Ap = Dry-gas meter inlet differential pressure, mm H2O (in. H2O) .
6 = Run time, min.
O
s* ">
-------
AIR IRIET
RSROnETER
\
V O CO
P P ra
(Q rt n
fl> (B ft
M-
W CO 0
(I) o
Figure 2.1. Sample meter system calibration setup.
vr>
»r>
M
-------
Date:
Dry-gas Meter Identification:
Barometric Pressure (P, ) :
_in. Hg
Approx-
imate
E low
rate
(0)
c£m
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
r— — i
Spiro-
meter
(wet
meter)
gas
volume
(V.)
ft'
r
Dry-
gas
meter
volume
(V^)
ftj
.
r
Spiro-
meter
(wet
meter)
(t.)
op
Pemperatur
I
Inlet
(t,)
oF
es
Dry-gas met
Outlet
(t,)
op
•
sr
Aver-
age
Aver-
age
meter
coef-
ficient
O rt
H*
^^§
^ Z
ID
O
o
Ii"u|iM'''> 2.2 Dry-c|iTn motor en 1 i brat i on rlntn form.
o
o
in
K)
-------
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3, 1952
Page 5
5. Compare the three Yd. values at each of the flow rates and determine the
maximum and minimum values. The difference between the maximum and
minimum values at each flow rate should be no greater than 0.030. Extra
sets of triplicate runs may be made to complete this requirement. Ir.
addition, the meter coefficients should be between 0.95 and 1.05. If
these specifications cannot be met in three sets of successive
triplicate runs, the meter is not suitable as a calibration standard and
should not be used as such. If these specifications are met, average
the three Yds values at each flow rate resulting in five average meter
coefficients, Yd..
6. Prepare a curve of meter coefficient, Yd>, versus flow rate, Q, for the
DGM. This curve shall be used as a reference when the meter is used to
calibrate other DGM's and to determine whether recalibration is
required.
Standard Dry-Gas Meter Recalibratioit-Recalibrate the standard DGM against a.
wet-test meter or spirometer annually or after every 200 hours of operation, whichever
comes first. This requirement is valid provided the standard DGM is kept in a
laboratory and, if transported, cared for as any other laboratory instrument. Abuse
to the standard meter may cause a change in the \calibration and will require more
frequent recalibrations.
As an alternative to full recalibration, a two-point calibration check may be
made. Follow the same procedure and equipment arrangement as for a full recalibration,
but run the meter at only two flow rates (suggested rates are 14 and 28 L/min [0.5 arid
.0 cfm]). Calculate the meter coefficients for these two points and compare the
•alues with the meter calibration curve. If the two coefficients are within 1.5% cf
the calibration curve values at the same flow rates, the meter need not be recalibrated
until the next date for a recalibration check.
2.1.3 Critical Orifices as Calibration Standards-Critical orifices may be used as
calibration standards in place of the wet-test meter specified in Section 5.3 of Methcd
5, provided that they are selected, calibrated, and used as follows:
Selection of Critical Orifices—The procedure that follows describes the use
of hypodermic needles or stainless-steel needle tubing that have been found suitable
for use as critical orifices. Other materials and critical orifice designs may be
used, provided the orifices act as true critical orifices (i.e., a critical vacuum car.
be obtained, as described in Section 7.2.2.2.3 of Method 5). Select five critical
orifices of appropriate size to cover the range of flow rates between 10 and 34 L/n^.n
or the expected operating range. Two of the critical orifices should bracket the
expected operating range.
A minimum of three critical orifices will be needed to calibrate a Method 5
DGM; the other two critical orifices can serve as spares, providing better selecticr.
for bracketing the range of operating flow
-------
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3, 1992
Page 6
rates. The needle sizes and tubing lengths shown below give the following approximate
flow rates:
o
Flow rate,
Gauge /cm
12/7.6
12/10.2
13/2.5
13/5.1
13/7.6
13/10.2
L/min
32.56
30.02
25.77
23.50
22.37
20.67
Flow rate,
Gauge /cm
14/2.5
14/5.1
14/7.6
15/3.2
15/7.6
15/10.2
L/min
19.54
17.27
16.14
14.16
11.61
10.48
These needles can be adapted to a Method 5-type sampling train as follows:
Insert a serum bottle stopper, 13- by 20-mm (0.5-in. by 75-in.) sleeve type, into a
13-mm (0.5-in.) Swagelok™ quick-connect fitting. Insert the needle into the stopper,
as shown in Figure 2.3.
Initial Critical Orifice Calibration—The procedure described in this section
uses the Method 5 meter box configuration with a DGM, as described in Section 2.1.8 of
Method 5, to calibrate the critical orifices. Other schemes may be used, subject to
the approval of the Administrator. The critical orifices must be calibrated in the
same configuration as they will be used (i.e., there should be no connections to the
inlet of the orifice) .
Prior to calibrating the critical orifices, the dry-gas meter in the meter box
must be calibrated. Before calibrating the meter box, leak check the system as
follows:
1. Fully open the coarse adjust valve and completely close the bypass
valve.
2. Plug the inlet.
3. Turn on the pump and determine whether there is any leakage. The
leakage rate must be zero (i.e., no detectable movement of the DGM dial
must be seen for 1 min).
4. Check also for leakages in the portion of the sampling train between the
pump and the orifice meter. See Section 5.6 for the procedure; make any
corrections, if necessary. If leakage is detected, check for cracked
gaskets, loose fittings, worn O-rings, etc., and make the necessary
repairs.
O
o
-------
f
i
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3, 19S2
Page 7
J
r_-7=^
JV5
1
-
-
.
k
m ii
1 II
H V
T
1
4
r
l
CRITICAL SERUM MICK
ORIFICE STOPPER CONNECT
Critical orifice adaptation to Method 5-type metering system.
o
METER BOX
DDDD
\
CRITICAL ORIFICE
Apparatus setup.
Figure 2.3 Critical orifice and apparatus setup.
-------
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3, 1992
Page 8
After determining that the meter box is leak-free, calibrate it according to
the procedure given in Section 5.3. Make sure that the wet-test meter meets the
requirements stated in Subsection 2.1.1. Check the water level in the wet-test meter.
Record the DGM calibration factor, Y. The critical orifice is then calibrated as
follows:
1. Set up the apparatus as shown in Figure 2.3.
2. Allow a warm-up time of 15 min. This step is important to equilibrate
the temperature conditions through the DGM.
3. Leak check the system as described above. The leakage rate must be
zero.
4. Before calibrating the critical orifice, determine its suitability anc
the appropriate operating vacuum as follows- Turn on the pump, fully
open the coarse adjust valve, and adjust the bypass valve to give e.
vacuum reading corresponding to about half an atmospheric pressure.
Observe the meter box orifice manometer reading, AH. Slowly increase
the vacuum reading until the meter box orifice manometer shows a stable
reading. Record the critical vacuum for each orifice. Orifices that
do not reach a critical value must not be used.
5. Obtain the barometric pressure using a barometer as described in Section
2.1.9 of Method 5. Record the barometric pressure, P^,., in mm Hg (in.
Hg) .
6. Conduct duplicate runs at a vacuum of 25 to 50 ram Hg (1 to 2 in. He)
above the critical vacuum. The runs must be at least S minutes each.
The DGM volume readings must be in increments of complete revolutions
of the DGM. As a guideline, the times should not differ by more thar.
3.0 s (this includes allowance for changes in the DGM temperatures) to
achieve ± 0.5% in K'. Record the information listed in Figure 2.4.
7. Calculate K' using Equation 2-3.
K, Vffl Y
AH/13.6)
1/2
o
o
K'
Equation 2-3
K' = Critical orifice coefficient, [ (m3) (°K)1/2] / [ (mm Hg)
, (min)H[(ftJ) (°R)1/2) ] / [ (in. Hg)(min)]}.
where:
Tamb = Absolute ambient temperature, °K (°R).
Average the K' values. The individual K' values should not differ by more than
from the average.
± 0.5%
o
-------
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3, 1992
Page 9
Date
Train ID
Critical orifice K' factor
Dry-Gas Meter
Final reading
Initial reading
Difference, Vm
Inlet /outlet temperatures
Initial
Final
Avg. temperature, tn
Time , 6
Orifice man. rdg., A H
Bar. pressure, Pbar
Ambient temperature, tmb
Pump vacuum
Critical orifice ID
m3 (ft3)
m3 (ft3)
m3 (ft3)
°C
°C
°C
min/s
min
mm (in.) H2O
mm (in.) Hg
°C (°F)
inm (in.) Hg
m3 (ft3)
Run number
1 2
DGM cal. factor, Y
Figure 2.4. Data sheet for determining DGM Y factor.
-------
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3. 1992
Page 10
Using the Critics! Orifices &s Calibration Standards—The dry-gas meter is
calibrated using the critical orifices as the secondary standard as follows:
1. Record the barometric pressure.
2. Calibrate the metering system according to the procedure outlined in
Sections 7.2.2.2.1 to 7.2.2.2.5. Record the information listed in
Figure 2.5.
3. Calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM and the
critical orifices and calculate the DGM calibration factor, Y, using the
equations below:
Vm,.td) = K, V,, [PUr 4- (AH/13.6)]/Tm Equation 2-4
Vcrt.td. = K' (Pb.r e)/TMbl/2 Equation 2-5
Y = Vcrlltdl/Vm(.,dl Equation 2-6
where:
vcri«id! = Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice,
corrected to standard conditions, dscm (dscf).
-~r~
K' = 0.3858 °K/mm Hg for metric units
= 17.64 °R/in. Hg for English units.
4. Average the DGM calibration values for each of the flow rates. The
calibration factor, Y, at each of the flow rates should not differ by
more than ± 2% from the average.
Recalibration of critical orifices—To determine the need for recalibrating the
critical orifices, compare the DGM Y factors obtained from two adjacent orifices each
time a DGM is calibrated. For example, when checking orifice 13/2.5, use orifices
12/10.2 and 13/5.1. If any critical orifice yields a DGM Y factor differing by more
than 2% from the others, recalibrate the critical orifice according to the initial
calibration procedures above.
2.1.4 Sample Meter System-The sample meter system—consisting of the pump, vacuum
gauge, valves, orifice meter, and dry-gas meter—should be calibrated by stringent
laboratory methods before it is used in the field. The calibration should be
re-checked after each field test series. This re-check is designed to provide testers
with a method that can be used more often and with less effort, to ensure that the
calibration has not changed. When the quick check indicates that the calibration
factor has changed, testers must again use the complete laboratory procedure to obtain
the new calibration factor. After recalibration, the metered sample volume must be
multiplied by either the initial or the recalibrated calibration factor-that is, the
one that yields the lower gas volume for each test run.
o
o
o
-------
Date
Train ID
Critical orifice ID
Dry-Gas Meter ."
\
s~
Final reading
Initial reading
Difference, Vm
Inlet/outlet temperatures
Initial
Final
Avg. temperature, tm
Time, 8
Orifice man. rdg., A H
Bar. pressure, P^
Ambient temperature, t
Pump vacuum
K' factor
Average
Section No. 3 .19.2
Date September 3, 1992
Page 11
DGM cal. factor
m3 (ft3)
m3 (ft3)
m3 (ft3)
°C (°F)
• ••*""*
°C (°F)
°C (°F)
min/s
min
mm (in.) H20
mm (in.) Hg
°C (°F)
-"V
mm (in'.) Hg
Run number
1 2
Figure 2.5. Data sheet for determining K' factor,
-------
o
o
Section "No. 3'Yl9.2
Date September 3, 1992
Page 12
Before calibrating the metering system for the first time, conduct a leak
check. The meter system should be leak-free. Both positive (pressure) and negative
(vacuum) leak checks should be performed. The following pressure lea'k check procedure
will check the metering system from the quick-connect inlet to the orifice outlet and
will check the orifice-inclined manometer: '• •'
1. Disconnect the orifice meter line from the downstream orifice pressure
tap (the one closest to the exhaust of the orifice); plug this tap
(Figure 2.1).
2. Vent to the atmosphere the negative side of the inclined manometer. If
the inclined manometer is equipped with a three-way valve, this step can
be performed by turning the valve on the negative side of the ori-
fice-inclined manometer to the vent position.
3. Place a one-hole rubber stopper with a tube through its hole into the
exit of the orifice; connect a piece of rubber or plastic tubing, as
shown in Figure 2.1.
4. Open the positive side of the orifice-inclined manometer to the
"reading" position; if the inclined manometer is equipped with a
three-way valve, this will be the line position.
5. Plug the inlet to the vacuum pump. If a quick-connect with a leak-free
check valve is used on the control module, the inlet will not have, to
be plugged.
6. Open the main valve and the bypass valve.
7. Blow into the tubing connected to the end of the orifice until a
pressure of 127 to 178 mm (5 to 7 in.) H20 has built up in the system.
8. Plug or crimp the tubing to maintain this pressure.
9. Observe the pressure reading for a 1-min period. No noticeable movement
in the manometer fluid level should occur. If the meter box has a leak,
a bubbling-type leak check solution may aid in locating it.
After the metering system is determined to be leak-free by the positive leak
check procedure, the vacuum system to and including the pump should be checked by
plugging the air inlet to the meter box. If a quick-connect with a'leak-free stopper
system is presently on the meter box, the inlet will not have to be plugged. Turn the
pump on, pull a vacuum within 7.5 cm (3 in.) Hg of absolute zero, and observe the
dry-gas meter. If the leakage exceeds 0.00015 mVmin (0.005 f tVmin), the leak(s) must
be found and minimized until the above specifications are satisfied.
Checking the meter system for leaks before initial calibration is not
mandatory, but it is recommended.
Note: For metering systems with diaphragm pumps, the normal leak check
procedure described above will not detect leakages within the pump. For these cases,
the following leak check procedure is suggested: Make a 10-min calibration run at
0.00057 m3/min (0.02 ftVmin); at the end of the run, take the difference between the
measured wet-test meter and the dry-gas meter volumes; divide the difference by 10 to
get the leak rate. The leak rate should not exceed 0.00057 m'/rain (0.02 ftVmin) .
Initial calibration-The dry-gas meter and the orifice meter can be calibrate/*~N
simultaneously and should be calibrated when first purchased and any time the posttesl )
check yields a Y outside the range of the calibration factor Y +0.05 Y. A calibrated
wet-test meter (of proper size, with -t-1% accuracy) should be used to calibrate the
dry-gas meter and the orifice meter. The dry-gas meter and the orifice meter should
be calibrated in the following manner:
-------
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3, 1992
Page 13
1. Before its initial use in the field, leak check the metering system.
Leaks, if present, must be eliminated before proceeding.
2. Assemble the apparatus, as shown in Figure 2.6, with the wet-test meter
replacing the probe and impingers-that is, with the outlet of the
wet-test meter connected to a needle valve that is connected to the
inlet side of the meter box.
3. Run the pump for 15 min with the orifice meter differential (AH) set at
12.7 mm (0.5 in.) H20 to allow the pump to warm up and to permit the
interior surface of the wet-test meter to be wetted.
4. Adjust the needle valve so that the vacuum gauge on the meter box is
between 50 and 100 mm (2 to 4 in.) Hg during calibration.
5. Collect the information required on the forms provided (Figure 2.7).
Sample volumes, as shown, should be used.
6. Calculate Y4 for each of the six runs, using the equation in Figure 2.7
under the Y, column, and record the results on the form in the space
provided.
7. Calculate the average Y (calibration factor) for the six runs using the
following equation:
Yl + Y2
Y3
Y4 + Y5
Y6
Equation 2-7
-------
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3, 1S52
Page 14
o
THERMOMETERS
CONTROL
UTUBE
MANOMETER
PUMP
DRY GAS METER
WET TEST METER
Figure 2.6. Equipment arrangement for dry-gas meter calibration.
O
_J
o
-------
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3, 1392
Page 15
Date
Meter box number
1
Barometric pressure, Ph = in. Ha Calibrated by
Ori-
fice
mano-
meter
set-
ting
(AH),
in. H2O
0.5
Gas volume
Wet-
test
meter
(Vw),
ft3
5
Dry-
gas
meter
(Vd),
ft3
1.0 10
.
1.5 10
2.0 10
3.0 10
4.0
10
Temperatures
Wet-
test
meter
(tv),
oF
Drv-aas meter
Inlet
-------
Section No. 3.19 .2
Date September 3, 1992
Page 16
Nomenclature:
Vw = Gas volume passing through the wet-test meter, ft3.
Vd = Gas volume passing through the dry-gas meter, ft3.
tw = Temperature of the gas in the wet-test meter, °F.
tdl = Temperature of the inlet gas of the dry-gas meter, °F.
tdo = Temperature of the outlet gas of the dry-gas meter, °F.
td = Average temperature of the gas in the dry-gas meter, obtained by the
average tdl and tdo , °F.
AH = Pressure differential across orifice, in. H20.
YJ = Ratio of accuracy of wet-test meter to dry-gas meter for each run.
Tolerance Y, = Y ± 0.02 Y.
Y = Average ratio of accuracy of wet-test meter to dry-gas meter for all
six runs. Tolerance Y = Y ± O.Ol Y.
AH@, = Orifice pressure differential at each flow rate that gives 0.75
ftVmin of air at standard conditions for each calibration run, }
of H2O. Tolerance = AH@ ± 0.15 (recommended).
o
o
AH@ = Average orifice pressure differential that gives 0.75 ftVmin of air
at standard conditions for all six runs, in. H20. Tolerance =1.84
± 0.25 (recommended).
6 = Time for each calibration run, min.
Pt. = Barometric pressure, in. Hg.
Figure 2.7. Dry-gas meter calibration data (English units, backside).
-------
10.
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3, 1992
Page 17
Record the average on Figure 2.7 in the space provided.
Clean, adjust, and recalibrate, or reject the dry-gas meter if one or
more values of Y fall outside the interval Y ± 0.02 Y. Otherwise, the
average Y is acceptable and should be used for future checks and
subsequent test runs.
Calculate AH@, for each of the six runs using the equation in Figure
2.7A or 2.7B under the AH@j column, and record on the form in the space
provided.
Calculate'the average AH0 for the six runs using the following equation:
AH@1
AH03 + AH@4 + AHS5 -t- AH@6
Equation 2-8
Record the average on Figure 2.7 in the space provided.
11. Adjust the orifice meter or reject it i'f'^H@i varies by more than ± 3.9
mm (0.15 in.) H20 over the range of 10 to 100 mm (0.4 to 4.0 in.) K50.
Otherwise, the average AHS is acceptable-arid should be used for sub-
sequent test runs. „ .... <, ....,
Posttest calibration check—After each field itest series, conduct a
metering-system calibration check, as specified in Subsection 2.1.4, except for the
following variations:
1. Three calibration runs at a single intermediate orifice meter setting
may be used with the vacuum set at a maximum value reached during the
test series. The single intermediate orifice meter setting should be
based on the previous field test. A valve must be inserted between the
wet-test meter and the inlet of the metering system to adjust the
vacuum. " " '" • --v • '...., ..,..,,_ ,__i
2. If a temperature-compensating dry-gas meter was used, the calibration
temperature meter must be within ± 6 °C (10.8 °F) of the average merer
temperature during the test series.
3. Use Figure 2.8 to record the required information.
If the calibration factor Y deviates by <5% from the initial calibration
factor Y, then the dry-gas meter volumes obtained during the test series are
acceptable. If Y deviates by >5%, recalibrate the metering system and use whichever
meter coefficient (initial or recalibrated) yields the lowest gas volume for each test
run.
Alternate procedures (e.g., using the orifice meter coefficients or critical
orifices) may be used.
-------
Section No. 3 .19.2
Date September 3, 1992
Page 18
o
Date
Metering System ID No.
Barometric pressure, Pb =
Ori-
fice
mano-
meter
set-
ting
AH
in. Hg
'Spiro-
meter
(wet
.
Temperatures
| Spiro-
test) | Dry-gas
gas
meter
meter 1 Dry-qas meter
(wet |
volume (volume (meter)
-------
2.2
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3, 1992
Page 19
Temperature Gauges
2.2.1 Impinger Thermometer—The thermometer used to measure the temperature of the
gas leaving the impinger train should initially be compared with a mercury-in-glass
thermometer that meets ASTM E-l No. 63C or 63F specifications. This procedure is as
follows:
1. Place both the reference thermometer and the test thermometer in an ice
bath. Compare readings after they stabilize.
^- 2. Remove the thermometers from the bath and allow both to come to room
temperature. Again, . compare readings after they stabilize.
3. Accept the test thermometer if its reading agrees to within 1 °C (2 °F)
of the reference thermometer reading at both temperatures. If the
difference is greater than 1 °C (2 °F), the thermometer should be
adjusted and recalibrated until the criteria are met, or it should be
rejected. Record the results on Figure 3.1 of Section 3.19.3.
2.2.2 Dry-gas Thermometers—The thermometers used to measure the metered gas sample
temperature should be compared initially with a mercury-inglass thermometer as above,
using a similar procedure.
1. Place the dial type (or equivalent1}" thermometer and the mercury-in-glass
thermometer in a hot water bath, 40 to 50 °C (104 to 122 °F). Compare
the readings after they stabilize.
2. Allow both thermometers to come to room temperature. Compare readings
after thermometers stabilize.
3. Users should accept the dial type (or equivalent) thermometer under the
following conditions: The values must agree to within 3 °C (5.4 °F) at
both points; the temperature differentials at both points are within 3
°C (5.4 °F), and the temperature differential is taped to the thermome-
ter and recorded on the pretest sampling check form (Figure 3.1).
4. Prior to each field trip, compare the temperature reading of the
mercury-in-glass thermometer at room temperature with that of the meter
system thermometer. The values or corrected values should be within 6
°C (10.8 °F) of one another, or the meter thermometer should be replaced
or recalibrated. Record any temperature correction factors on Figure
3.1 of Section 3.19.3 or on a similar form.
2.2.3 Stack Temperature Sensor—The stack temperature sensor should be calibrated
upon receipt or checked before field use. Each sensor should be uniquely marked for
identification. The calibration should be performed at three points and then extra-
polated over the range of temperatures anticipated during actual sampling. For the
three-point calibration, a reference ASTM mercury-in-glass thermometer should be used.
The following procedure is recommended for calibrating stack temperature
sensors (thermocouples and thermometers) for field use.
I. For the ice-point calibration, form a slush from crushed ice and liquid
water (preferably deionized, distilled) in an insulated vessel such as
a Dewar flask. Taking care that they do not touch the sides of the
flask, insert the stack temperature sensors into the slush to a depth
of at least 2 in. Wait 1 min to achieve thermal equilibrium and record
the readout on the potentiometer. Obtain three readings taken at i-min
intervals.
Note: Longer times may be required to attain thermal equilibrium
with thick-sheathed thermocouples.
-------
Section No. 3 .19 .2
Date September 3,
Page 20
^™^
V J
Fill a large Pyrex beaker with water to a depth >4 in. Place several
boiling chips in the water and bring the water to a full boil using a
hot plate as the heat source.
Insert the stack temperature sensor (s) in the boiling water to a
depth of at least 2 in., taking care not to touch the sides or bottom
of the beaker.
Place an ASTM reference thermometer alongside the sensor (s) . If
the entire length of the mercury shaft in the thermometer cannot be
immersed, a temperature correction './ill be required to give the correct
reference temperature.
After 3 min, both instruments will attain thermal equilibrium.
Simultaneously record temperatures from the ASTM reference thermometer
and the stack temperature sensor three times at 1-min intervals.
For thermocouple, repeat Step 2 with a liquid (such as cooking oil) that
has a boiling point in the 150 to 250 °C (300 to 500 °F) range. Record
all data on Figure 2.9. For thermometers other than thermocouples,
repeat Step 2 with a liquid that boils at the maximum temperature at
which the thermometer is to be used, or place the stack thermometer and
reference thermometer in a furnace or other device to reach the required
temperature . -«~
Note: If the thermometer is to be used at temperatures higher than the
reference thermometers can record, the stack thermometer may be
calibrated with a thermocouple previously calibrated with the above^—. .
procedure . { )
If the absolute values of the reference thermometer and thermocouple (sV_X
agree to within 1.5% at each of the three calibration points, plot the
data on linear graph paper and draw the best-fit line to the three
points or calculate the constants of the linear equation using the
least -square method. The data may be extrapolated above and below the
calibration points to cover the entire manufacturer's suggested range
for the thermocouple. For the portion of the plot or equation th&-
agrees within 1.5% of the absolute reference temperature, no correcticr.
need be made. For all portions that do not agree within 1.5%, use the
plot or equation to correct the data.
If the absolute values of the reference thermometer and stack
temperature sensor (other than the thermocouple) agree to within 1.5%
at each of the three points, the thermometer may be used over the ranee
of calibration points for testing without applying any correcticr.
factor. The data cannot be extrapolated outside the calibration points.
-------
Date
Ambient temperature
Calibration person
Thermocouple No.
°F Barometric pressure
Reference: mercury-in-glass
other
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3, 1992
Page 21
in. Hg
op
oF
Reference
point
number
|Source"
j(specify)
I
(Reference
I thermometer
|temperature,
OF
I
I Thermocouple
|potentiometer
I temperature,
I Temperature*
I difference,
1%
Type of calibration system used.
(ref temp, °F + 460) - (test thermom temp, °F + 460) x 10Q _ (
-------
Section No. 3.19 .2
Date September 3, 19S2
Page 22
o
2.3 Probe Heater
The probe heating system should be calibrated prior to field use according to
the procedure outlined in APTD-0576. Probes constructed according to APTD-0581 need
not be calibrated if the curves of APTD-0576 are used.
2.4 Barometer ..>•„, -
The field barometer should be adjusted initially' and before each test series:
to agree to within 2.5 mm (0.1 in.) Hg of the mercury-inglass barometer or with the
station pressure value reported by a nearby National Weather Service station, corrected
for elevation. The correction for elevation difference between the station and the
sampling point should be applied at a rate of -2.4 mm Hg/30 m (-0.1 in. Hg/100 ft).
Record the results on the pretest sampling check form (Figure 3.1 of Section 3.19.3).
2 .5 Probe Nozzle
Probe nozzles should be calibrated before initial use in the field. Using a
micrometer, measure the ID of the nozzle to the nearest 0.025 mm (0.001 in.). Make
three measurements using different diameters each time, and obtain the average. Tne
difference between the high and the low numbers should not exceed 0.1 mm (0.004 in.
When nozzles become nicked, dented, or corroded, they should be reshaped, sharpened,^
and recalibrated before use. Each nozzle should be permanently and uniquely
identified. Figure 2.10 is an example of a nozzle calibration data form.
2.6 Pitot Tube
The Type S pitot tube assembly should be calibrated using the procedure
outlined in Section 3.1.2 of this Handbook for Method 2.
2 .7 Trip Balance
The trip balance should be calibrated initially by using Class £ standard
weights and should be within 0.5 g of the standard weight. Adjust or return the
balance to the manufacturer if limits are not met.
O
-------
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3, 1992
Page 23
I/Date
Calibrated by
Nozzle
ID No.
Nozzle Diameter*
mm (in.)
1
mm (in.)
im (in.)
'
~f~
\
ADb
mm ( in . )
-
1
mm ( in . )
where :
8 EI.;, 3 = Three different nozzle diameters, mm (in. ; each diameter must be measured
AD
within (0.025 mm) 0.001 in.
Maximum difference between any two diameters, mm (in.), AD <(0.10 mm) 0,004
in.
Average of D,, D;, and D3.
Figure 2.10. Nozzle calibration data form.
-------
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3, 1992
Page 24
TABLE 2.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION
o
Apparatus
Wet-test
meter
Dry-gas
meter
Critical
Thermo-
meter
Probe
heating
system
Barometer
Acceptance limits
Capacity S3. 4
mVh (120 ftVh);
accuracy within
± 1.0%
Yj = Y ± 0.02 Y
K' = K i 0.03 K'
Impinger thermo-
meter ± 1 °C (2
°F) ; dry-gas meter
thermometer ± 3 °C
(5.4 °F) over
range ; stack
temperature sensor
± 1.5% of absolute
temperature
Capable of
maintaining 120 °C
± 14 °C (248° ± 25
°F) at a flow rate
of 20 L/min
(0.71 ft'/min
± 2.5 mm (0.1 in.)
Hg of mercury-in-
glass barometer
Frequency & method
of measurement
Calibrate initially,
and then yearly by
liquid displacement
Calibrate vs.
wet-test meter
initially, and when
posttest check
exceeds Y ± 0.05 Y
Calibrate vs. wet,
dry, or~ bubble meter
upon receipt and
after each test
Calibrate each ini-
tially as a separate
component against a
mercury-in-glass
thermometer; then
before each trip
compare each as part
of the train with
the mercury-in-glass
thermometer
Calibrate component
initially by APTD-
0576; if constructed
by APTD-0581, or use
published calibra-
tion curves
Calibrate initially
vs. mercury-in-glass
barometer; check
before and after
each field test
(Action if
| requirements
| are not met
1
(Adjust until
| specifications
(are met, or
jturn to
(manufacturer
1
(Repair, or
| replace and then
(recalibrate
1
1
(Repair and then
| recalibrate,
(or replace
1
(Adjust;
(determine
|a constant
(correction
| factor;
(or reject
1
1
1
(Repair, or
| replace and
(then reverify
(the calibration
1
1
(Adjust to agree
(with a certified
(barometer
1
1
O
(Continued)
o
-------
TABLE 2.1. (Continued)
Section No. 3.19.2
Date September 3, 1992
Page 25
Apparatus
I
(Acceptance limits
|Frequency & method
I of measurement
I Action if
|requirements
I are not met
Probe
nozzle
(Average of three
|ID measurements of
(nozzle; difference
(between high and
| low SO . 1 mm
I(0.004 in.)
|Use a micrometer to
(measure to nearest
(0.025 mm (0.001 in.)
I
I
(Recalibrate,
I reshape, and
I sharpen when
(nozzle becomes
(nicked, dented
|corroded
Trip
balance
|500-g capacity;
|capable of measur-
|ing within ± 0.5 g
(check with standard
(class S weights upon
(receipt
(Adjust, replace
(or return to
I manufacturer
-------
o
o
o
-------
-------
o
Section No. 3.19.3
Date September 3, 1992
Page 1
3.0
PRESAMPLING OPERATIONS
O
This section addresses preparing and packing sampling supplies and equipment.
The pretest preparations form (Figure 3.2 of Method 5, Section 3.4.3) can be used as
an equipment checklist, a status form, and a packing list for Methods 1-4 and Method
101A. The (QA) activities for the presampling operations are summarized in Table 3.1
at the end of this section.
A pretest check will have to be made on most of the sampling apparatus.
Figure 3.1 should be used to record the pretest calibration checks. A schematic of the
EPA Method 101A sampling train is shown in Figure 1.1. Commercial models of this
system are available. Each train must be in compliance with the specifications of the
reference method, Section 3.19.10.
Apparatus Check and Calibration
3 .1
3.1.1 Nozzles and Pi^Jf^yH^fST^MasplSft^idheaffifiga^J^dn should be checked to see
that it is operating properly. The probe should be sealed at the inlet or tip and
checked for leaks at a vacuum of 380-mm (15 in.) Hg, and the probe must be leak-free
under these conditions. The nozzles should be~ calibrated using the procedures in
Subsection 2.5 of Section 3.19.2. Clean the probe ,and the nozzle's internal surfaces
using the procedures described abdP«3>{§im8egSi©ii S323si^e^fia§3$f aHReT?tB&*saa«ap]Hhe
ends of the nozzle should be sealed with a Teflon film. _
•ou saA
3.1.2 Filter #oldeirf/UStojIiW£
-------
(f
Section No. 3.19.3
Date September 3, 1992
Page 3
3.1.7 Bare/neter-The field barometer should be compared with the mercury-in-glass
barometer or the weather station reading, after making an elevation correction, prior
to each field trip.
3 .2 _Sample Recovery Equipment and Reagents
Clean all sample exposed-glassware using the following procedures:
1. Soak glassware in 50% HN03 for a minimum of 1 h.
2. Rinse with tap water.
3. Rinse with 8 N HCl.
4. Rinse with tap water.
5. Rinse with DI water.
3.2.1 Glass Sample Bottles—The sample bottles must be leak-free, must gave
Teflon-lined caps, and must be 1000 and 100 mL in size.
3.2.2 Graduated Cylinder—A 250-mL graduated cylinder is required.
3.2.3 Funnel an'd Rubber Policeman—These items aid in transferring the silica gel to
the container; they are not necessary if the silica gel is weighed in the field.
I"
3.2.4 Funnel—A glass funnel is required to aid in sample recovery.
3.3 Equipment Packing ,
The accessibility, condition, and functioning of measurement devices in the,
field depend on packing them carefully and on moving them carefully at the site.
Equipment should be packed to withstand severe treatment during shipping and field
operations. The material used to construct shipping cases is therefore important. The
following containers are suggested, but they are not mandatory.
3.3.1 Proie—Seal the inlet and outlet of the probe to protect it from breakage and
pack it in the container. An ideal container is a wooden case (or the equivalent)
lined with foam material and having separate compartments to hold the individual
probes. The case should have handles or eye-hooks that can withstand hoisting and that
are rigid enough to prevent bending or twisting during shipping and handling.
3.3.2 Impingers, Connectors, and Assorted Glassware-All impingers and glassware
should be packed in rigid containers and protected by polyethylene or other suitable
material. Individual compartments for glassware will help to organize and protect each
piece.
3.3.3 Volumetric Glassware-A sturdy case lined with foam material can contain dryir.g
tubes and assorted volumetric glassware.
3.3.4 Meter Box—The meter box, which contains the manometers, orifice meter, vacuum
gauge, pump, dry-gas meter, and thermometers, should be packed in a shipping container
unless its housing is sufficient to protect components during travel. Additional puz.p
oil should be packed if oil is required. A spare meter box should be included in case
of failure.
3.3.5 Wash Bottles and Storage Containers-Storage containers and miscellaneous
glassware should be packed in -a rigid, foam-lined container.
-------
Section No. 3.19.3
Date September 3, 1992
Page 4
3.3.6 Chemicals-Chemicals should be packed in a rigid, foam-lined container.
As mentioned in Subsection 1.5.1.6 (Absorbing Solution, 4% KMn04) , caution
must be exercised for the storage and transport of KMnO<. To prevent autocatalytic
decomposition of the permanganate solution, filter it through Whatman 541 filter paper.
The reaction of the KMnO4 with the acid may cause pressure buildup in the sample
storage bottle. These bottles should not be filled to capacity and should be vented
to relieve excess pressure and to prevent explosion of the sample. A No. 70-72 hole
drilled in the container cap and Teflon liner is recommended.
Also, caution should be exercised with the HC1 reagent because it is highly
corrosive. . • '' ' ' .
' • ' • t. ••!":'':. j
j "
3.3.7 Safety Equipment for Sampling Train Preparation and Sample Recovery-Safety
glasses and protective laboratory gloves should be packed for the personnel assigned
to prepare the sampling train and recover the sample. Serious injury can result from
contact with HC1 and KMn04.
o
o
X
X
-------
Section No. 3.19.3
Date September 3, 1952
Page 5
TABLE 3.1 ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR PRESAMPLING OPERATIONS
Apparatus
Apparatus
Check and
Calibration
Nozzles
and
probe
liners
1
(Acceptance limits
1
1
1
1
1
|l. Probe heating
| system capable of
| heating to 120 °C
|± 14 °C at a flow
jrate of 20 L/min
1
| 2 . Probe leak free
jat 380-mm (15 in.)
(Hg
1
|3. Nozzles
(calibrated
| (Sec. 3.19.2
I Subsec . 2.4)
1
1
(Frequency & method
| of measurement
!
1
1
1
1
|l. Check heating
(system initially and
(when moisture cannot
|be prevented during
(testing
1
| 2 . Visually check
(before test
1
1
|3. Before -test to
(nearest O.D25-irun
(with micrometer
1
1
Action if
requirements
are not met
1 . Repair or
replace
2 . Replace
3. Recalibrate,
reshape, or
replace
(4. Probe and
(nozzle free of
|contaminants
j(Sec. 3.2)
I
14. Clean internally
(by brushing with tap
(water, deionized
(distilled water, and
(acetone; air dry
(before test
|4. Repeat
|cleaning and
|assembly
|procedures
I
Impingers,
filter
holders,
and other
glassware
(Meets specifica-
|tions in Subsec. 1
(of Sec. 3.19.1;
|cleaned according
|to Sec. 3.19.3
|Subsec. 3.1.2; and
(sealed with
(Teflon or glass
|stoppers
Before each test
(Repair or
(discard and
replace
Dry-gas
meter
(clean and readings
(within 2% of
|average
(calibration factor
(Calibrate according
(to Sec. 3.19.2
I
Repair or
replace and ther
recalibrate
Filters
|Free of
|irregularities
(visually check prior
(to testing
(Replace
(Continued)
-------
TABLE 3.1 (Continued)
Section No. 3.19.3
Date September 3, 1992
Page 6
o
Apparatus
I
(Acceptance limits
(Frequency & method
I of measurement
(Action if
[requirements
are not met
Silica gel
(indicating, 6-16
|mesh, use fresh-
|or dry-used silica
(gel at 175 °C
(350 °F)
I If moisture content
|is to be determined,
(weigh several 200-
jto 300-g portions of
(silica gel
11 (± 0.5 g); use
(airtight containers;
|record weight of
(container plus
(silica gel
(calibrated, within (Calibrate against
|mercury-in-glass •
|thermometer
I(Sec. 3.4.2) before
| each
Replace or
reweigh
Thermo-
meters
°C (2 °F) for
|impinger thermo-
lmeter, ± 3 °C
I (5.4 °F) for
(dry-gas meter
|thermometer
Replace
O
Barometer
(Calibrated, within
J2.5-mm (0.1 in.)
(Hg
(calibrate against
| mercury-in-glass
(barometer (Sec.
j 3 .7 .2) before each
test
Replace
Sample
Recovery
Equipment
and
Reagents
Glass
sample
bottles
Graduated
cylinder
(Clean, leakless,
(Teflon-lined caps
(clean, glass and
(class A; 250 mL
(with <2 mL
I subdivisions
(Before each field (Replace
(test I
I I
I I
(Before each field (Replace
|trip check for |
(cracks, breaks, and |
(manufacturer flaws |
Funnel
(Clean, glass,
(Class A
Same as above
Same as above
O
(Continued)
-------
Section No. 3.19.3
Date September 3, 1992
Page 7
TABLE 3.1 (Continued)
Apparatus
Equipment
packing
Probe
Impingers ,
connectors,
and
assorted
glassware
Volumetric
glassware
Meter box
Wash
bottles
and
storage
containers
Chemicals
Acceptance limits
Rigid container
protected by
polyethylene foam
Rigid container
protected by
polyethylene foam
Packed in original
containers, if
available, or a
rigid container
lined with foam
and marked
•Fragile"
_|
Meter box case
and/or additional
material to
protect train
components; pack
spare -meter box
Rigid foam-lined
container
Rigid foam-lined
container
I Frequency & method
of measurement
Prior to each
shipment
Prior to each
shipment
Prior -ifb each
shipment \
Prior to each
shipment
Prior to each
shipment
Prior to each
shipment
[Action if
requirements
are not met
Repack
Repack
Repack
Repack
Repack
Repack
Y
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.19.4
Date September 3, 1992
Page 1
4.0 ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
On-site activities include transporting the equipment to the test site, unpacking
and assembling the equipment, sampling for particulate and gaseous mercury, and
recording the data. The associated QA activities are summarized in Table 4.1 at the
end of this section.
4.1 Transport of Equipment to the Sampling Site
The most efficient means of transporting the equipment from ground level to the
sampling site (often above ground level) should be decided during the preliminary site
visit or by prior correspondence. Care should be taken to prevent damage to:the
equipment or injury to .test personnel during the moving. A clean "laboratory type"
area free of excessive dust and mercury' compounds should be located and designated for
preparing the nozzle, probe, filter holder, and impingers and for sample recovery.
4.2 Preliminary Measurements and Setup
A preliminary survey should be conducted prior to sampling and analysis, unless
adequate prior knowledge of the source is available. Testing must be conducted at the
proper sampling locations and during the proper process and control equipment operating
cycles or periods. Testers should refer to Subsection 3.19.3.1 for information
ypically needed to establish the proper sampling and analysis protocol.
Testers should have calculated the minimum sampling run time required, unless it
is known that the minimum time stated by the applicable regulations will be sufficient
to provide proof of compliance.
In this method, highly oxidizable matter may make it impossible to sample for the
desired minimum time. This problem is indicated by the complete bleaching of the
purple color of the KMnO4 solution. In these cases, testers may divide the sample run
into two or more subruns to ensure that the absorbing solution will not be depleted.
In cases where excess water condensation is encountered, collect two runs to make one
sample. •••.•-.,
4.2.1 Preliminary Measurements and Setup-The sampling site should be selected in
accordance with Method 1. If the duct configuration or some other factor makes this
impossible, the site should be approved by the Administrator, prior',to conducting the
test. A 115-V, 30-A electrical supply is necessary to operate the standard sampling
train. Either measure the stack and determine the minimum number of.;traverse points
by Method 1, or check the traverse points determined during the preliminary site visit
(Section 3.0) . Record all data on the traverse point location,form shown in Method 1.
These measurements will be used to locate the pitot tube and the sampling probe during
preliminary measurements and actual sampling.
-------
Section No. 3.19,
Date September 3,
Page 2
1992
o
4.3 Preparations for Sampling
The most common situations and problems are addressed in this section. Both
required and recommended QA/control checks and procedures are provided to assist in
collecting data of acceptable quality and to assess the accuracy of the sampling and
analysis.
On-site sampling includes the following steps:
1. Conducting preliminary measurements and setting up the recovery area.
2. Preparing and setting up the sampling system for leaks.
3. Connecting electrical service and checking the sampling system for leaks.
4. Heating the probe and filter to the proper temperature.
5. Inserting the probe into the duct and sealing the duct.
6. Isokinetic sampling.
7. Recording data.
8. Posttest leak check of the sampling system.
9. Recovering the sample and transporting it to the laboratory.
4.3.1 Stack Parameters-Check the sampling site for cyclonic or nonparallel flow as
described in Method 1 (Section 3.0). The sampling site must be acceptable before a
valid sample can be taken. Determine the stack~rpressure, temperature, and the range
of velocity heads encountered (Method 2) . Determine the moisture content using the
approximation Method 4, or its alternatives, for the purpose of setting the isokinetic
sampling rate. If the identical source has been tested before or if a good estimateX^X
of the moisture content is available, this should be sufficient. The reference methodt )
(Section 3.4.10) uses the condensate collected during sampling to determine the
moisture content used in final calculations. If the stack is saturated with moisture
or has water droplets, the moisture content must also be determined by partial pressure
with the use of a more accurate stack gas temperature sensor (Method 4).
Determine the dry molecular weight of the stack gas, as required in Method 2.
If an integrated gas sample is required, follow Method 3 procedures and take the gas
sample simultaneously with, and for the same total length of time, as the particulate
run. The sampling and the analytical data forms for molecular weight determinations
are in Method 3.
Using the stack parameters obtained by these preliminary measurements, the tester
can set up the nomograph as outlined in APTD-0576 or use a calculator. An example of
a nomograph data form is.shown in Figure 4.1 of the Method 5, Section 3.4.4.
Select a nozzle size based on the range of velocity heads, so that it is not
necessary to change the size to maintain isokinetic sampling rates during thev>run.
Install the selected nozzle using a Viton A O-ring when glass liners are used. Other
connecting systems such as Teflon ferrules may be used. Mark the probe with heat
resistant tape or by some other acceptable method to denote the proper distance into
the stack or duct for each sampling point. Select a total sampling time greater than
or equal to the minimum total sampling time specified in the test procedures for the
specific industry so that:
1. The sampling time per point is >2 min (a greater time interval may be
specified by the Administrator).
2. The sample volume corrected to standard conditions exceeds the required
minimum total gas sample volume.
The latter can be based on an approximate average sampling rate. Its-
recommended that the number of minutes sampled at each point be either an integer o"
an integer plus one-half minute to avoid timekeeping errors. In some circumstances
(e.g., batch cycles), it may be necessary to sample for shorter times- at the traverse
D
-------
Section No. 3.19 .4
Date September 3, 1992
Page 3
points and to obtain smaller gas sample volumes. In these cases, the Administrator's
approval must be obtained first.
4.3.2 Sampling Train Preparation—During preparation of the sampling train, keep all
openings where contamination can occur covered until just prior to assembly or until
sampling commences. The glassware should have been cleaned as described in Section
3.19.3 by soaking in 50% HNO, and then rinsing with tap water, 8 N HC1, tap water, and
finally deionized distilled water. Prepare the individual sampling train components
as follows:
Impinqers
1. Place 50 ml of fresh 4% KMnO4 in the first cleaned impinger using a graduated
cylinder that has been properly cleaned,
2. Place 100 ml of fresh 4% KMn04 in the second and third impingers using a
graduated cylinder, and
3. Place 200 to 300 g of preweighed silica gel in the fourth impinger.
Precaution: It is extremely important that all.sample recovery personnel wear
safety glasses and gloves due to the dangers associated with impinger solutions and
recovery solutions.
Record the weight of the silica gel and the container on the sample recovery data
form, Figure 4.1, or other similar data form. -'"Place the empty container in a safe
place for use later in the sample recovery. If moisture content is to be determined
by impinger analysis, weigh each of the first three impingers to the nearest 0.5 g, and
record these weights. Place the silica gel container in a clean place for later use
in the sample recovery. Alternatively, the weight of the silica gel plus impinger may
be determined to the nearest 0.5 g and recorded.
-------
Section No. 3.19 .4
Date September 3, 1992
Page 4
o
Plant Sample Data
Sample Location Run No.
Sample Recovery Person Recovery Date
Filter(s) No.
MOISTURE
Impinqers
Final volume (wt) ml (g) Final wt g g
Initial volume (wt) ml (g) Initial wt g g
Net volume (wt) ml (g) Net wt g g
Total moisture g
RECOVERED SAMPLE BLANK
Blank filter Container No. KMnO4 added, sealed and level marked?
Blank KMnO4 solution (650 mL) Container No. Sealed and level marked?
Blank HC1 solution (25 mL added to 200 mL H2O) Container No.
Sealed and level marked?
RECOVERED SAMPLE
KMn04 impinger contents and rinse (400 mL) Container No.
Sealed and level marked?
Filter Container No. KMnO4 added, sealed and level marked?
HCl solution (25 mL added to 200 mL H,O) Container No.
Sealed and level marked?
Samples stored and locked?
Remarks:
O
Date of laboratory custody
Laboratory person taking custody
Remarks:
Figure 4.1. Sample recovery and integrity data form.
-------
Section No. 3.19.4
Date September 3, 1992
Page 5
The use of a filter is optional in Method 101A. However, because of the
digestion techniques used for sample preparation, it is highly recommended that a
falter be used. Assemble the filter holder as follows:
Filter (optional)
1. Using a tweezer or clean disposable surgical gloves, place a filter in the
filter holder. Be sure that the filter is properly centered and that the
gasket is properly placed to prevent the sample gas stream from circumventing
the filter.
2. Visually check the filter for damage after the assembly is completed.
3. The filter or filter sample container should be marked.
Record the filter number on the sample recovery data form and then place the
filter sample container in a clean place for later use in the sample recovery.
Assemble the probe and nozzle as follows:
Probe/nozzle assembly
1. The probe liner should be glass and cleaned using the procedures described
above.
2. Place the properly sized, calibrated, and cleaned nozzle on the inlet of the
probe using a Teflon ferrule or Viton O-ring connection.
The nozzle should be uniquely identified. Record the nozzle number and diameter
on the sampling data form. -*~
\
4.3.3 Sampling Train Assembly—Assemble the train'as shown in Figure 1.1, using (if
necessary) a very light coat of silicone grease only on the outside of all ground-glass
joints to avoid contamination. The tester may find that it is beneficial to conduct
a leak check of the. sampling train in the assembly area prior to taking the system to
the;stack.
The sampling train is then transported to the stack. At the stack, place crushed
ice and water around the impingers. If not already an integral part of the probe
assembly, a temperature sensor should be attached to the metal sheath of the sampling
probe so that the sensor extends beyond the probe tip and does not touch any metal.
The sensor's position should be about 1.9 to 2.54 cm (0.75 to 1 in) from the pitot tube
and the nozzle to avoid interference with the gas flow. Alternative arrangements are
shown in Method 2.
4.3.4 Sampling Train Leak Checks—Leak checks are necessary to assure that the sample
has not been biased low by dilution air. The reference method (Section 3.19.10)
specifies that leak checks be performed at certain times as discussed below.
Pretest—A pretest leak check is recommended, but not required. If the tester
opts to conduct the pretest leak check, follow the procedure described below:
After the sampling train has been assembled, set the filter heating system at the
desired operating temperature. Allow time for the temperature to stabilize. If a
Viton A O-ring or other leak free gasket is used in connecting the probe nozzle to the
probe liner, leak check the train at the sampling site by plugging the nozzle and
pulling a 380- mm (15 in) Hg vacuum. Note: A lower vacuum may be used if it is not
exceeded during the test.
If an asbestos string is used for the probe gasket, do not connect the probe to
the train during the leak check. Instead, leak check the train by first plugging the
inlet to the filter holder and pulling a 380-mm (15 in) Hg vacuum (see note in the
previous paragraph) . Then connect the probe to the train and leak check at about 25-iran
(1 in.) Hg vacuum; alternatively, the probe may be leak checked with the rest of the
sampling train in one step at a 380-mm (15 in.) Hg vacuum. Leakage rates >4% of the
average sampling rate or 0.00057 mVmin (0.02 ftVmin) , whichever is less, are
unacceptable.
-------
Section No. 3.19.4
Date September 3, 1992
Page 6
The following leak check instructions for the sampling train are taken from APTD- \)
05813 and APTD-0576. Start the pump with the bypass valve fully open and the coarse
adjust valve closed. Open the coarse adjust valve and then slowly close the bypass
valve until the desired vacuum is reached. Do not reverse the direction of the bypass
valve; this will cause KMnO4 solution to back up from the impingers into the filter
holder. If the desired vacuum is exceeded, either leak check at this higher vacuum or
end the leak check as described below and start over.
When the leak check is complete, first slowly remove the plug from the inlet to
the probe or the filter holder and then close the coarse adjust valve and immediately
turn off the vacuum pump. (This prevents the KMnO4 in the impingers from being forced
back into the filter holder and prevents the silica gel from being forced back into the
third impinger.) Visually check to be sure KMn04 did not contact the filter and that
the filter has no tears before beginning the sampling.
During the Sampling—If. a component (e.g., filter assembly or impinger) change is
necessary during the sampling run, a leak-check should be conducted before the change.
The leak-check should be done according to the procedure outlined above, except that
it should be at a vacuum equal to or greater than the maximum value recorded up to that
point in the test. If the leakage rate is <0.00057 mVmin (0.02 ftVmin) or 4% of the
average sampling rate (whichever is less), the results are acceptable, and no
correction need be applied to the total volume>~of dry gas metered. If, however, a
higher leakage rate is obtained, the tester either>should record the leakage rate and
plan to correct the sample volume as shown in Section 6.3(b) of the Reference Method
(Section 3.19.10), or should void the sampling run. Note: Be sure to record the dry
gas meter reading before and after each leak-check performed during and after each test
run so that the sample volume can be corrected.
Posttest—A leak-check is mandatory at the conclusion of each sampling run. The
leak-check should be in accordance with the procedures in this section and at a vacuum
equal to or greater than the maximum value reached during the sampling run. If the
leakage rate is <0.00057 mVmin (0.02 ftVmin) or 4% of the average sampling rate
(whichever is less), the results are acceptable, and no correction need be applied to
the total volume of dry gas metered. If, however, a higher leakage rate is obtained,
the tester either should record the leakage rate and correct the sample volume as shown
in Section 6.3(a) or 6.3(b) of the Reference Method (Section 3.19.10), or should void
the sample run. Note: Be sure to record the dry gas meter reading before and after
performing the leak check so that the sample volume can be corrected.
4.3.5 Sampling Train Operation—Just prior to sampling, clean the portholes to minimize
the chance of sampling deposited material. Verify that the probe and the filter
heating systems are up to the desired temperatures and that the pitot tube and the
nozzle are located properly. Follow the procedures below for sampling.
1. Record the initial dry gas meter readings, barometric pressure, and other
data as indicated in Figure 4.2.
2. Position the tip of the probe at the first sampling point with the nozzle tip
pointing directly into the gas stream. When in position, block off the open
area around the probe and the porthole to prevent flow disturbances and
unrepresentative dilution of the gas stream.
3. Turn on the pump and immediately adjust the sample flow to attain isokinetic
conditions. Nomographs, calculator programs, and routines are available to
aid in the rapid determination of the orifice pressure drop corresponding to
the isokinetic sampling rate. If the nomograph is designed as shown in APTD-
0576 it can be used only with an Type S pitot tube which has a Cp coefficient
of 0.85 ± 0.02 and when the stack gas dry molecular weight (Ms) is 29 i 4.
If Cp and Ms are outside these ranges, do not use the nomograph without
o
X""X
f J
^—
-------
Section No. 3.19.4
Date September 3, 1992
Page 7
compensating for the differences. Recalibrate isokinetic rate or reset
nomograph if the absolute stack temperature (Ts) changes more than 10%.
4. Take other readings required by Figure 4.2 at least once at each sampling
point during each time increment.
5. Record the dry gas meter readings at the end of each time increment.
6. Repeat steps 3 through 5 for each sampling point.
7. Turn off the pump, remove the probe from the stack, and record the final
readings after each traverse.
8. Conduct the mandatory posttest leak check (Subsection 4.2.5) at the
conclusion of the last traverse (after allowing the nozzle to cool). Record
any leakage rate. Also, leak check the pitot lines (Method 2, Section 2.1);
the lines must pass this leak-check to validate the velocity pressure data.
9. Disconnect the probe, and then cap the nozzle and the end of the probe with
polyethylene or equivalent caps.
-------
Plant
City
Location
Operator
Date
Run No.
Stack dia. mm (in).
Sample box No.
Meter box No.
Meter AH@
Meter calibration (Y)
Pitot tube (Cp)
Probe length
Probe liner material
Probe heater setting
Ambient temperature _
Barometric press (Pb)
Assumed moisture
Static press. (Pa)
C Factor
Reference AH@
Sheet
Nozzle ID No.
of
ft Nozzle diameter
Thermometer No.
Final leak rate
°F Vacuum during leak-check
iron (in)
m3/min (cfm)
mm (in) Hg
mm (in) Hg Filter No(s).
%H2O Remarks:
mm (in) Hg
traverse
point
number
Sampling
time,
(6) , min
\
[_..
Total
Clock
time,
(24 h)
._
Vacuum,
mm
(in) Hg
Max
Stack
temp
(Ts)
°C (°F)
•
Avg
Velocity
head
(APs)
mm
(in) Hg
Press
across
orifice
meter
(AH) , mm
(in) Hg
Gas sample
volume (Vm) ,
m3 (ft3)
"J
--
(Total
i
Dry gas meter
temperature
Inlet | Outlet
°C(°F) °C(°F)
Avg | Avg
Gas temp
leaving
impinger
°C(°F)
Max
Filter
temp
°C(°F)
0> D» rr
1 CD > o
..._. *rt a
H
L. ^M
OJ «>
L-
ID
to
Figure 4.2. Method 101A field sample data form.
o
o
o
-------
'Section 3.19.4
Date April 3, 1992
Page 9 -i
During the test run, a sampling rate of 10% of the isokinetic rate must be
maintained unless otherwise specified by the Administrator. The sampling rate must be
adjusted at any sampling point if a 20% variation in velocity pressure occurs.
Periodically during the test, observe the connecting glassware—from the probe,
through the filter, to the first impinger—for water condensation. If any is evident,
adjust the probe and/or filter heater setting upward until the condensation is
eliminated; add ice around the impingers to maintain the silica gel exit temperature
at 20 °C (68 °F). : -
The manometer level and ; zero should also be checked periodically during each
traverse. Vibrations and temperature fluctuations can cause the manometer zero to
Shift. " -> ' -c- '••• .....--:. . ,:
4 .4 Sample Recovery
The reference method (Section 3.19.10) requires that the sample be recovered from
the probe, from all glassware preceding the filter, from the front half of the filter
holder, from the filter, and from the impingers and connecting glassware in an area
sheltered from wind and dust to prevent contamination of the sample. Begin proper
cleanup procedure as soon as the probe is removed from the stack at the end of the
sampling period. Allow the probe to cool. When-art can be safely handled, wipe off any
external particulate matter near the tip of the probe nozzle, and place a cap over it.
Do not cap off the probe tip tightly while the sampling train is cooling because the
resultant vacuum could draw liquid out from the impingers. Before moving the sample
train to the cleanup site, remove the probe from the train, wipe off the silicone
grease, and cap the open outlet of the probe and the inlet of the sample train.
Be careful not to lose any condensate that might be present. Wipe off the
silicone grease from the impinger. Use either ground-glass stoppers, plastic caps, or
serum caps to close these openings. The capped-off impinger box .and the capped
sampling probe can be transported to the cleanup area without risk of losing or
contaminating the sample. Transfer the probe, impinger assembly, and (if applicable)
filter assembly to a cleanup area that is clean, protected from the wind, and free of
Hg contamination. The ambient air in laboratories located in the immediate vicinity
of Hg-using facilities is not normally free of Hg contamination. Inspect the train
before and during disassembly, and note any abnormal conditions. .->,.,;••._.
Precautions It is extremely important that all sample recovery personnel wear
safety glasses and gloves due to the dangers associated with impinger solutions and
recovery solutions. ..-".-••!•
The following sample recovery sequence includes (1) recovery-of the sample from
the impingers using KMnO<, Container 1; (2) recovery of any residual brown deposits
from the impingers using water, Container 1; (3) recovery of the sample from the probe
and connecting glassware using KMnO«, Container No.l; (4) recovery of any residual
brown deposits from the probe and connecting glassware using water, Container No.l; (5)
recovery of any residual brown deposits from sample train components not removed by
water with HC1, Container 1A; recovery of silica gel. Container 2; (6) recovery of the
filter, Container No. 3; (7) collecting a. filter blank, Container No.,4,; (8) collecting
an KMnO< reagent blank, Container No. 5; (9) collecting a water reagent blank, and (10)
collecting a HC1 reagent blank.
4.4.1 Impinger Contents (Container Nos. 1 and 1A)—Recover the samples follows: c
1. Note the color of the reagent in each of the impingers and record the color
on the Sample Recovery Data Form. If the color of the KMnO« in the last
impinger has changed from the purple color, the sample run will be considered
invalid and must be repeated. •• If all the impinger solution has been
-------
o
. Section 3.19.4 .--.-<
-•• " Date April 3, 1992
Page 10
oxidized, the tester should (1) reduce the sample time or volume if the
reduced time or volume will comply with the applicable regulations, (2) add
another impinger containing KMnO<, or (3) use two sample trains per sample
run.
2. Using a properly cleaned graduated cylinder, measure the liquid in the first
three impingers to within 1 ml. Record the volume of liquid on the Sample
Recovery and Integrity Data Form. This information is needed to calculate
the moisture content of the effluent gas. (Use only graduated cylinders and
glass storage bottles 'that have been precleaned as in Section 3.19.3.)
3. Place the contents of the first three impingers in a properly cleaned,
1000-ml glass sample bottle (Container No. 1). Record the data on the sample
recovery data form.
4. Prior to recovering the sample, place 400-ml of fresh KMnO« in a graduated
cylinder for sample recovery. This solution is used to recover sample from
the probe nozzle, probe fitting, probe liner, and front half of the filter
holder (if applicable) and impingers (sample-exposed surfaces). Rinse the
impingers with a portion (about 100 ml) of the 400 ml of fresh 4% KMnO<
solution to assure removal of all loose particulate matter from the
impingers; add all washings to the 1000-ml glass sample bottle (Container No.
1) .
5. To remove any residual brown deposits; on the glassware following the
permanganate rinse, carefully rinse all the sample-exposed glassware with
approximately 100 ml of water. Add this rinse to Container No. 1. The
impingers should only require about 50 ml of the 100 ml of water.
6. If no visible deposits remain after this water rinse, do not rinse with 8 N
HC1. However, if deposits remain on the glassware after the water rinse,
place 25 ml of 8 N HC1 in a graduated cylinder. Wash impinger walls and
stems with this 25 ml of 8 N HCl as follows: Place 150 ml of water in a
sample container labeled Container No. 1A. Use only a total of 25 ml of 8 N
HCl to rinse all impingers. Wash the impinger walls and stem with the HCl by
turning and shaking the impinger so that the HCl contacts all inside
surfaces. Pour the HCl wash carefully while stirring into Container No. 1A.
Rinse all glassware that was exposed to HCl with 50 ml water, and add water
rinse to Container No. 1A. Label the sample bottle and record the sample
number on the Sample Recovery Data Form. The separate container is used for
safety reasons.
4.4.2 Probe and Connecting Glassware (Container No. Ij-The same sample bottle
(Container No. 1) as used above for the impinger contents and sample rinse is usually
adequate for the collection of all the rinses. Recover the sample from the probe liner
and connecting glassware as follows:
1. Clean the outside of the probe, the pitot tube, and the nozzle to prevent
particulates from being brushed into the sample bottle. Take care that dust
on the outside of the probe or other exterior surfaces does not get into the
sample during the quantitative recovery of the Hg (and any condensate) from
the probe nozzle, probe fitting, probe liner, and front half of the filter
holder (if applicable).
2. Carefully remove the probe nozzle and rinse the inside surface (using a ny
bristle brush and several KMnO< rinses) into the sample bottle (Container1- No f
1) .
3. Clean the compression fitting by the same procedure. Rinse all sampleexposed
glassware components with the total of 400 ml of fresh 4% KMnO< solution as
O
-------
Section 3.19.4
Date April 3, 1992
Page 11
measured above. Add these washings to the 1000-ml glass sample bottle
(Container No. 1).
4. After the KMnO4 rinse, use a small portion of the remaining 100 ml of water
to rinse the nozzle and connecting glass after the KMnO4 rinse. Add the
rinses to Container 1.
The following probe rinsing procedure should be performed by two people to
preclude sample loss. The rinsing procedures for the probe liner and connecting
glassware is as follows:
1. Rinse the probe liner by tilting and rotating the probe while squirting fresh
4% KMnO4 solution into the upper (or nozzle) end to assure complete wetting
of the inside surface.
2. Allow the KMnO, solution to drain into the sample bottle (Container 1) using
a funnel to prevent spillage.
3. Hold the probe in an inclined position and squirt KMnO4 solution into the
upper end while pushing the probe brush through the liner with a twisting
motion, and catch the drainage in the sample bottle. Repeat the brushing
procedure three or more times until a visual inspection of the liner reveals
no particulate remaining inside.
4. Rinse the liner once more with KMn04 solution.
5. Rinse the brush with KMn04 solution into^Container 1 to remove all sample that
is retained by the bristles. >
6. Rinse the probe liner with the remaining 100 ml of water into Container 1.
7. Wipe all the connecting joints clean of silicone grease, and clean the inside
of the front half of the filter holder by rubbing the surface with a nylon
bristle brush and rinsing it with KMn04. Repeat the procedure at least three
times or until no particles are evident in the rinse.
8. Make a final rinse of the filter holder and brush.
9. Clean any connecting glassware which precedes the filter holder, using Steps
5 and 6.
After all washings have been collected in Container No. 1, tighten the lid on the
container to prevent leakage during shipment to the laboratory. It is recommended that
the lid have a No. 70-72 hole drilled in the container cap and Teflon liners for
pressure relief. Mark the height of the fluid level to determine whether leakage
occurs during transport. Label the container to identify its contents clearly, and
note it on the Sample Recovery Data Form.
4.4.3 Silica Gel (Container No. 2)—Note the color of the indicating silica gel to
determine whether it has been completely spent, and make a notation of its condition
on the sample recovery data form, Figure 4.3.
1. Transfer the silica gel from the fourth impinger to its original container
using a funnel and a rubber policeman, and seal the container. It is not
necessary to remove the small amount of dust particles that may adhere to
the impinger wall; since the weight gain is used for moisture calcula-
tions, do not use water or other liquids to transfer the silica gel.
2. Determine the final weight gain to the nearest 0.5 g, if a balance is
available.
4.4.4 Filter ("Container No. 3)-Carefully remove the filter (if used) from the filter
holder, place it in a 150-ml glass sample bottle, and add 20 to 40 ml of 4% KMnO^ to
merge the filter. If it is necessary to fold the filter, be sure that the
'articulate cake is inside the fold. Carefully transfer, to the 150-ml sample bottle,
any particulate matter and filter fibers that adhere to the filter holder gasket by
using a dry Nylon bristle brush and a sharp-e|dged blade. Seal the container. Clearly
-------
Section 3.19.4
Date April 3, 1992
Page 12
label the container to identify its contents. Mark the height of the fluid level to
determine whether leakage occurs during transport.
4.4.5 Filter Blank (Container No. 4)—If. a filter is used for testing, initially take
an unused filter for each field test series and label as a filter blank. Treat the
filter blank in the same manner as described in Subsection 4.3.4 above.
4.4.6 Absorbing Solution Blank (Container No. 5;-For a blank, place 650 ml of 4% KMn04
absorbing solution in a 1000-ml sample bottle. If the 100 ml water rinse was used
during recovery, carefully add a second 100 ml portion of water to Container No. 5.
It is recommended that the lid have a No. 70-72 hole drilled in the container cap and
Teflon liners for pressure relief. Mark the height of the fluid level to determine
whether leakage occurs during transport. Label the container as the KMnO4 blank, and
seal the container.
4.4.7 8 N HC1 Blank (Container No. 6)-It 8 N HCl was used (Container 1A) to remove any
residual brown deposits remaining after rinsing sample-exposed glassware with fresh 4%
KMnO, solution and water, place 25 ml of 8 N HCl used for removing the deposits in a
separate sample container (Container No. 6) containing 200 ml of water. Mark container
as the HCl blank, and seal the container. -f~
\
4.5 Sample Logistics and Packing Equipment
Follow the sampling and sample recovery procedures until the required number of
runs are completed and blank samples are labeled. Log all data on the Sample Recovery
and Integrity Data Form, Figure 4.1. At the conclusion of the test:
1. Check all rinses and filters for proper labeling (time, date, location, test
run number, and any other pertinent documentation) . Be sure that blanks have
been set aside and labeled.
2. If possible, make a copy of the field data form(s) in case the originals are
lost.
3. Examine all sample containers for damage and ensure that they are properly
sealed for transport to the base laboratory. Ensure that the containers are
labeled properly for shipping to prevent loss of samples or equipment.
4. Review the field sampling data form and any other completed data forms to
ensure that all data have been recorded and that all forms are present.
4.6 Systems Audit
A Method 101A sampling and sample recovery checklist is presented in Figure 4.3.
o
o
o
-------
Section 3.19.4
Date April 3, .1992-
Page 13
Date Time • Operator Observer
Method 101A Sampling Procedures
Probe Nozzle: stainless steel glass
Button-hook elbow size
Cleaned according to sampling protocol? __
Sealed with Teflon tape or other cover?
Probe liner: borosilicate quartz _________ other
Cleaned according to sampling protocol? "
Openings sealed with Teflon tape?
Probe heating system:
Checked? Temperature Stable?
Pitot tube: Type S Other
Properly attached to probe (no interference to nozzle)?
Modi f i cat ions: ;
Pitot tube coefficient \
ijpjpjjj/ Differential Pronsure Gauge: Inclined manometers
Magnahelics Ranges
Other Ranges
Cyclone (inlet only): borosilicate glass other
Cleaned according to sampling protocol?
Filter Holder: borosilicate glass other
Frit material: glass Teflon other
Gasket material: silicone other
Cleaned according to sampling..protocol?
Sealed with Teflon tape or glass caps?
Filter type (a):
Cleaned according to sampling protocol?
Impinger Train: number of impingers
Cleaned according to sampling protocol?
Contents: 1st 2nd 3rd
4th 5th 6th
Impinger weights recorded? ;
Proper connections? —
Modifications
Silica gel: type new? used?
Figure 4.3. Field observation of Method 101A sampling and recovery.
-------
Section 3.19.4
Date April 3, 1992
Page 14
o
Date Time Operator Observer
Method 101A Sampling Proceduren
Procedure
Barometer: mercury aneroid other
Can Doncity Determination: temperature sensor
pressure gauge
Temperature sensor properly attached to probe?
Recent Calibrations: pitot tubes
meter box thermocouples/thermometers
Filters checked visually for irregularities?
Filters properly centered? labelled?
Sampling site properly selected?
Nozzle size properly selected?
Proper sampling time selected or calculated?
All openings of sampling train sealed (pretest
and posttest)?
Impingers, filter holder, probe, and nozzle assembled?
Cyclone attached (inlet only)?
Pitot lines checked for leaks and plugging?
Meter box leveled? Manometers zeroed?
AH@ from most recent calibration
Nomograph setup correctly? K factor
Pretest leak-check conducted? __Leakage rate?
Care taken to avoid scraping nipple or stack wall?
Effective seal around probe when in-stack?
Probe moved to traverse points at proper time?
Figure 4.3. (Contined)
O
o
-------
Section 3.19.4
Date April 3, 1992
Page 15
Date
Time
Operator
Observer
Method 101A Sampling Proccduroo
Nozzle and pitot tubes kept parallel to stack at all times?
Filter(s) changed during run?
Any particulate lost during filter change?
Data forms completed and data recorded properly?
Nomograph setting changed with significant change in the stack temperature?
Velocity pressure and orifice pressure recorded.accurately?
—r**
Leakage rate
Posttest leak-check conducted?
at inches of mercury
Orsat analysis?
Stack
Integrated
Approximate stack temperature
Percent isokinetic calculated
Comments
Gas sample volume
Figure 4.3. (Continued)
-------
Section 3 .19.4
Date April 3, 1992
Page 16
Date Time Operator Observer
Mothod 101A Sample Rocovory
Reagentc:
Bruohoo: Teflon bristle other
Cleaned according to sampling protocol?
Waoh bottloo: glass other
Cleaned according to sampling protocol?
Storage containoro: glass? other?
Cleaned according to sampling protocol?
Teflon cap liner? Leak free?
Small hole in cap to relieve pressure?
Filter containorc: borosilicate glass other
Cleaned according to sampling protocol? -~
Graduated cylinder: borosilicate glass other
Subdivisions of graduated cylinder <2 ml?
Cleaned according to sampling protocol?
Balance typo: Calibrated?
Probe allowed to cool sufficiently?
Probe and sample train openings covered?
Clean-up area(s) used
KMnO4 Volume: Was 400 mL of KMnO< measured for recovery?
Filter handling: tweezers used? surgical gloves?
Any particulate lost?
KMnO< added to filter?
Probe handling: KMn04 rinses Brushed?
H,O rinses Brushed?
Rocovory of probo: probe nozzle probe fitting
probe liner front half of filter holder _
Figure 4.3. (Continued)
o
o
o
-------
Section 3 .19.4
Date April 3, 1992
Page 17
Date Time Operator . Observer
Method 101A Sample Recovery (cont)
HC1 Volume: Was 25 mL of HC1 measured for recovery?
Xmpingor handling: weighed? volumed?
KMn04 rinses H2O rinse
HC1 rinses
Blankn collected: filter
KMnO< (650 mL)
HC1 (25 mL in 200 mL of H2O)
Container No. 1: Sample No. 400 mL KMnO4 rinse.
Impinger contents Impinger Rinse
Probe rinse Nozzle rinse ^Z
Container No. 1A: Sample No. 25 mL HCl
Impinger rinse
11 'v
ontainer No. 2 Silica gel: color? condition? weighed?
Samples labeled and stored properly?
Liquid levels marked?
Remarks: __
Figure 4.3. (Continued)
-------
Section 3.19.4
Date April 3, 1992
Page 18
o
TABLE 4.1. ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR ON-SITE MEASUREMENT CHECKS
Apparatus
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Preliminary
determinations and
measurements
Determine the
moisture content of
stack gas
Determine flow rate
of stack gas
Determine stack
temperature
Determine stack
dimensions
Determine dry
molecular weight of
stack gas
Select sampling time
S minimum total sam-
pling time in
applicable emission
standard; number of
minutes between read-
ings should be an
integer
Once each field test;
use wet bulb/dry bulb
thermometer,'Method 4,
or sling psychrometer
Once each field test,
using Method 1
Prior to and during
sampling
Prior~to sampling,
using tape measure
Once each field test,
Method 2; if inte-
grated gas sample is
required, Method 3
Prior to sampling
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
O
Complete
Preparation of
collection train
Assemble train
according to
specifications in
Figure 1.1 and Sec.
3.18.4 Subsec. 4.3.3
Leak-check; Leak
rate < 4% or 0.00057
mVmin (0.02 ft3/
min) , whichever is
less
Before each sampling
run
Complete
Leak-check before sam-
pling by plugging the
nozzle or inlet to
first impinger and by
pulling a vacuum of
380 mm (15 in) Hg
Correct the leak
O
(Continued)
-------
Section 3.19.4
Date April 3, 1992
Page 19
X^N
©
TABLE 4.1 (Continued)
Apparatus
Acceptance limits
Frequency and method
of measurement
Action if
requirements
are not met
Sampling
(isokinetically)
Within 10% of
isokinetic condition
Standard check for
minimum sampling
time and volume;
sampling time/point
S 2 min
Minimum number of
points specified by
Method 1
Leak-check; leakage
rate < 0.00057 mV
min (0.02 ftVmin)
or 4% of the average
sampling volume,
whichever is less
Calculate for each
sample run
Make a quick calcu-
lation before each
test, and exact cal-
ulation after
Check before the first
test run by measuring
duct and using Method
1
—i™~
Leak-check after each
test run1 or before
equipment replacement
during test at the
maximum vacuum during
the test (mandatory)
Repeat the test
run
Repeat the test
run
Repeat the pro-
cedure to comply
with specifica-
tions of Method 1
Correct the
sample volume,
or repeat the
sampling
Sample recovery
Sample free of
contaminat ion
Transfer sample as
outlined in Sec 3.19.
4, subsec 4.5 after
each test run; label
containers and mark
level of solution in
container
Repeat the
sampling
Sample logistics
and packing of
equipment
All data recorded
correctly
All equipment
examined for damage
and labelled for
shipment
All sample contain-
ers and blanks
properly labelled
and packaged
After completion of
each test and before
packing; if possible,
make copies of forms
After completion of
each test and before
packing
Visually check upon
completion of each
sampling
Complete data
Repeat sampling
if damage occurred
during the test
Correct when
possible
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.19.5
' Date September 3, I9B2
Page 1
5.0 POSTSAMPLING OPERATIONS
The postsampling operations include postsampling calibration checks of
sampling equipment and analysis by atomic absorption spectrophotometry techniques. The
sample analysis includes calibrations and performance checks. Checklists for
monitoring the postsampling operations are provided at the end of this section. Table
5.1 at the end of this section summarizes the QA activities associated with the
postsampling operations.
5.1 Calibration Checks of Sampling Equipment
Posttest checks will have to be made on most of the sampling apparatus. These
checks will include three calibration runs at a single orifice meter setting, cleaning,
and/or routine maintenance. Cleaning and maintenance are discussed in Section 3.19.7
and in APTD 0576. Figure 5.1 can be used to record the posttest checks.
5.1.1 Metering System—The metering system has two components that must b=
checked-the dry-gas meter and the dry-gas meter thermometer(s).
The dry-gas meter thermometer(s) should be compared with the ASTM mer-
cury-in-glass thermometer at room temperature. If the two readings agree within 6 CC
(10.8 °F) , they are acceptable; if not, the thermometer must be recalibrated according
to Subsection 2.2 of Section 3.19.2 after the posttest check of the dry-gas meter. Fcr
calculations, use the dry-gas meter thermometer readings (field or recalibraticr.
values) that would give the higher temperatures.':'That is, if the field readings are
higher, no correction is necessary, but' if the rec'alibra'tion value is higher, add the
difference .in the two readings to the average dry-gas meter temperature reading.
The posttest check of the dry-gas meter is described in Section 3.19.2. The
metering system should not have any leaks that were corrected prior to the posttesr
check. If the dry-gas meter calibration factor (Y) deviates by <5% from the initial
calibration factor, the dry-gas meter volumes obtained during the test series are
acceptable. If Y deviates by >5%, recalibrate the metering system (Section 3.19.2;.
For the calculations, use the calibration factor (initial or recalibration) that yields
the lower gas volume for each test run.
5.1.2 Stack Temperature Sensors—The stack temperature sensor readings should be
compared with the reference thermometer readings.
For thermocouple (s), compare the thermocouple and reference thermometer values
at ambient temperature. If the values agree within 1.5%!of the absolute temperature,
the calibration is considered valid. If the values do not agree within 1.5%, recali-
brate the thermocouple as described in Section 3.19.2 to determine the difference (A75
at the average stack temperature (T.) . NOTE: This comparison may be done in the field
immediately following the tests.
For thermometers, compare the reference thermometer:
1. At ambient temperatures for average stack temperature below 100 °C (212
-------
Section No. 3.19 .5
Date September 3, 1992 /"""N
Page 2 I )
Plant Calibrated by
Meter box number Date
Dry-Gas Meter
Pretest calibration factor, Y .. .. (within 2%)
Posttest check, Y* (within 5% of pretest value)
Recalibration required? ' yes ____________________ no
If yes, calibration factor, Y (within 2%)
Lower calibration factor, Y for calculations (pretest or posttest)
Dry-Gas__ Meter Thermometers
Was a pretest temperature correction used? yes _ no
If yes, temperature correction (within 5.4 °F over range)
Posttest comparison with mercury-in-glass thermometer? * (within 10.8 °F at ambient
temperature) , °F
Recalibration required? yes _no
Recalibration temperature correction? ' (within 5.4 °F over range)
If. yes, no correction necessary for calibration if meter thermometer temperature
is higher, if calibration temperature is higher, add correction to average meter
temperature for calculations.
Stack Temperature Sensor
o
Was a pretest temperature correction used? yes no
If yes, temperature correction °F (within 1.5% in. °R over range)
Average stack temperature of compliance test, T, °R .
Temperature of reference thermometer or solution °R (within 10% of T.)
Temperature of stack temperature for recalibration °R
Difference between reference and stack thermometers, AT, °R
Do values agree within 1.5%?* yes no
If yes, no correction necessary for calculations.
If no, calculation must be done twice—once with the recorded values and once with
the average stack temperature corrected to correspond to the reference
temperature differential (AT.) . Both final results must be reported.
Barometer
Was the pretest field barometer correct? yes no
Posttest comparison?* in. Hg (within 0.1 in. Hg)
Was recalibration required? yes no
If yes, no correction necessary for calculations when the field barometer has a
lower readings; if the mercury-in-glass reading is lower, subtract the difference
from the field data readings for the calculations.
Figure 5.1. Posttest calibration checks.
O
-------
: Section No. 3.19.5
Date September 3, 1992
Page 3
2. In boiling water for stack temperatures from 100 °c to 200 °C.
3. In a boiling liquid with the boiling point above 200 °C for stack
temperatures between 200 to 405 °C. For stack temperatures above 405
°C, compare the stack thermometer with a thermocouple at a temperature
within 10% of the average stack temperature. If the absolute values
agree within 1.5%, the calibration is considered valid. If not,
determine the error (AT.) to correct the average stack temperature.
5.1.3 Barometer—The field barometer should be compared to a Hg-in-glass barometer.
If the readings agree within 5 mm (0.2 in.) Hg, the field readings are acceptable; if
not, use the lesser calibration value for the calculations. If the field barometer
reads lower than the Hg-inglass barometer, the field data are acceptable. If the
Hg-in-glass barometer gives the lower reading, use the difference in the two readings
(the adjusted barometric value) in the calculations.
5.2
Sample Preparation
Field samples and reagent blanks should be'prepared concurrently, if possible.
Check the liquid level in each container to see whether liquid was lost during
transport. If a noticeable amount of leakage occurred, either void the sample or use
methods subject to the approval of the Administrator-to account for the losses. Record
the findings of the liquid level check on the sample1 preparation data form, Figure 5.2,
or another suitable form. Then follow the procedures below.
5.2.1 Containers Wo. 3 and
following procedures apply:
No. 4 (Filter and Filter Blank)—1£ a. filter; is used, the
Place the contents, including the filter, of Container No. 3 in a
separate, properly cleaned, and uniquely identified 250-mL beaker.
Using three rinses of approximately 10 mL of water, complete the sample
transfer from the container. Record the beaker number with the run
number on the sample preparation data form.
Place the contents of Container No. 4 in a properly cleaned 250-mL
beaker. Label it as the sample filter blank or as another suitable
name. Use three rinses of approximately 10 mL of water for the sample
transfer. Record the name on the sample preparation data form.
Heat the beakers in a laboratory hood on a steam bath until most of the
liquid has evaporated. Do not take to dryness. Do not use direct
heating on a hot plate. Record the completion of the step on the sample
preparation data form.
Add 20 mL of concentrated HN03 to each beaker, cover each beaker with a
watch glass, and heat on a hot plate at 70 °C • for 2 h in a laboratory
hood. Record completion of this step on the sample preparation data
form.
-------
Section No. 3.19.5
Date September 3, 1992
Page 4
Sample Preparation Data Form
Date _ Plant Name _ Sampling Location
Sample Preparation Checks
Sample Integrity Check: Have containers leaked?
Container 1 _ 4 _
1A _ 5 _
2 _ 6 _
3
Run Run Run Blank
123
Place a check to indicate completion
of step or record data as indicated.
Preparation of Filter Digest: Container No. 3
Sample No. for each 250-mL beaker
Contents added to a glass 250-mL beaker?
Heated carefully to near dryness
(not dryness) using a steam bath?
Volume of HNO3 added to beaker 25 mL?
Covered with watch glass?
Heated at 70 °C on hot plate for 2 h?
How was temperature monitored?
Filtered through Whatman 40 paper ?
Date
Time
Rinsed beaker residue carefully through
the filter?
Saved filtrate?
Preparation of Sample No. A.I:
Are Container No. 1 contents <1000 mL?
If so, volume, mL
Are Container No. 1 contents filtered through
Whatman 40 paper?
Filter saved?
Filtrate added to mL glass volumetric flask?
Filter digest (above) added to flask with
Container No. 1 filtrate?
Completion of Sample No. A.I?
Date
Time
o
o
Figure 5.2. Sample preparation data form.
-------
Section No. 3.19.5
Date September 3, 1992
Page 5
Run Run Run Blank
1 • 2 ••..-. 3
Preparation of Sample No. HCl A.2:
25 mL of 8N HC1 added to filter saved from
preparation of Sample No. A.I?
How was HC1 added?
Digestion started, Time
Date
Digestion ^completed, Time
Date
HC1 digest dilution volume, mL
Preparation of Filter Blank;
Container 4 contents added to 250-mL beaker
Heated carefully to near dryness
(not dryness) using a steam bath? -^"n-
Volume of HN03 added to beaker 25 mL?
Covered with watch glass?
Heated at 70 °C on hot plate for 2 h?
How was temperature monitored?
Preparation of Sample A.I Blank;
Are Container No. 5 contents diluted to same '
volume as Container No. 1 contents?
Filtered through Whatman 40 paper?
Filter saved?
Filtrate added to 1000-mL glass
volumetric flask?
Filter blank (Container No. 4) digest (above)
added to same volumetric flask?
Time of completion of Sample No. A.I
Preparation of Sample No. HCl A.2 Blank;
25 mL of 8N HCl added to filter saved from
preparation of Sample No. A.I blank?
How was HCl added?
Time 24-h digestion started?
Date
Time
Time 24-h digestion completed?
Date
Time
HCl digest was diluted to 500 mL using glass
volumetric flask?
Figure 5.2. (Continued)
-------
Section No. 3.19 .5
Date September 3, 199
Page 6
Note: The analysts should use gloves and safety glasses and should avoid skin
contact and breathing the fumes from the HN03.
5. Remove the beaker from the hot plate and filter the solution from the
digestion of the contents of Container No. 3 through a separate Whatman
40 filter paper into a properly cleaned and identified (the same sample
identification number can be used) sample container using a vacuum
filtering system. Use three rinses of approximately 10 mL of water for
the sample transfer. The filtration should be conducted in a laboratory
• hood. Record the completion of this step on the sample recovery data
form.
6. Save the filtrate for addition to the Container No. 1 filtrate, as de-
scribed in Subsection 5.2.2. Discard the filter.
7. Filter the solution from the digestion of the contents of Container No.
4 (sample filter blank) through Whatman 40 filter paper, as described
above in Step 5, and save the filtrate for addition to the Container No.
5 filtrate, as described in Section 5.2.2. Discard the filter.
5.2.2 Container No. 1 (Impingers, Probe, and Filter Holder) and. If Applicable, 1A
(HCl Rinse)—The KMnO4 impinger solution and rinse and HCl rinse (if applicable) are
prepared as follows: -*~
Note: Because of the hazardous nature of the HNO3 and HCl solutions, analysts
must wear gloves and safety glasses and should avoid skin contact and breathing they
fumes from HN03 and HCl. The HNCX, and KMnO4 solutions should not come in contact wit*
oxidizable matter.
KMnO, Impinqer Solution and Sample Recovery Rinse
1. To remove the brown MnO2 precipitate, filter the contents of Container
No. 1 through a Whatman 40 filter into a properly cleaned and identified
1-L volumetric flask. Use three rinses of approximately 10 mL of water
for the sample transfer.
2. Save the filter for digestion of the brown MnO2 precipitate, as
described in steps 6 through 9 below, and record the date and time the
filtration step was completed on the sample preparation data form.
3. Add the sample filtrate from Container No. 3 produced in Subsection
5.2.1 above to the appropriate 1-L volumetric flask from Step 1, and
dilute to volume with water. If the combined filtrates are greater than
1000 mL, determine the volume to the nearest mL and record the volume
on the sample preparation data form. This volume will be used to make
the appropriate corrections for blank subtractions and emissions
calculations.
4. Mix thoroughly. The filtrate will be referred to as Analysis Sample No.
A.I.
5. The Analysis Sample No. A.I must be analyzed for Hg within 48 h after
completion of the filtration step. If the sample is not analyzed within
this period, steps 1 through 4 must be repeated, the additional Whatman
40 filter paper will be digested as described below in steps 6 through
9, and the digestion will be added to the sample.
Whatman 40 Filter and MnCs Precipitate
6. Place the saved filter, which was used to remove the brown MnQf ^
precipitate, into a container of appropriate size. Submerge the filte\>_y'
with 25 mL of 8 N HCl and allow it and the brown residue to digest for
a minimum of 24 h at room temperature. Record the date and time for the
beginning of the digestion on the sample preparation data form.
-------
Section No. 3.19.5
Date September 3, 1952
Page 7
Whatman 40 Filter. MnO, Precipitate, and HC1 Rinse
7. Filter the contents of Container No. 1A, HC1 rinse (if applicable)
through a Whatman 40 filter into "a properly cleaned and identified
500-mL volumetric flask. Use three rinses of approximately 10 mL of
water for the sample transfer. Record completion on the sample
preparation data form.
8. Filter the digestion of the brown MnO2 precipitate and Whatman filter
from Step 6 into the 500-mL volumetric flask from Step 7. Use three
rinses of approximately 10 mL of water for the sample transfer. Record
the date and time of the filtration on the sample preparation data fora.
9. Dilute to volume with water. This solution will be referred to as
Analysis Sample No. HC1 A.2. Save the solution for Kg analysis as
described in Subsection 5.3.4 below. Discard the filters.
5.2.3 Containers No. 5 (Absorbing Solution Blank) and No. 6 (HC1 rinse blank)-Tne
procedures for preparing the blank solutions are described below:
Note: The same precautions should be taken with the blank solutions as were taken with
the sample solutions. The sample blanks have been designed to allow easy blank
subtraction from the sample. The volume of all solutions and the number of filters are
identical to the field samples. Therefore, the blank sample must be prepared at the
same time and in the same manner as the field samples.
KMnO4 Reagent Blank Solution and Sample Recovery Blank Rinse
1. Treat Container No. 5 (650 mL of blank absorbing solution) the same as
Container No. 1 (described in steps 1 through 5 in Subsection 5.2.2).
Filter Blank
2. Add the filter blank filtrate from Container No. 4 (completed in steps
1 through 7 of Subsection 5.2.1 above) to the 1-L volumetric flask
(containing Container No. 5 filtrate), and dilute to volume. Mix
thoroughly.
3. This solution will be referred to as Analysis Sample No. A.I blank.
4. Analysis Sample No. A.I blank must be analyzed for Hg within 48 h after
the completion of the filtration step.
Whatman 40 Filter and KMnO4 Reagent Blank Precipitate
5. Digest any brown precipitate remaining on the filter from the filtration
of Container No. 5 by the same procedure described in step 6 ir.
Subsection 5.2.2 above.
Whatman 40 Filter, KMnO4 Blank Precipitate, and Blank HCl Rinse
6. Filter the contents of Container No. 6 by the same procedure described
in steps 7, 8, and 9 in Subsection 5.2.2 and combine into the 500-nl
volumetric flask with the filtrate from the digested KMnO< blar.k
precipitate. The resulting 500-mL combined dilute solution will be
referred to as Analysis Sample No. HCl A.2 blank. NOTE: As discussed ir.
Subsection 5.3.4 below, when analyzing samples A.I blank and HCl A.2
blank, always begin with 10-mL aliquots; this note applies specifically
to blank samples.
5.3
Analysis
Precise and accurate analysis requires that the Hg analysis system bs
calibrated properly, which includes preparing calibration standards and field samples.
-------
Section No. 3 .19.5
Date September 3, 1992
Page 8
For Method 101A, spectrophotometer calibration is conducted in conjunction with
analyzing the field samples (and QA samples). This section presents the steps for
analyzing the field samples and includes preparing sample and field blanks, as well as
describing how to quality control (QC) samples. It discusses the relationship between
analyzing the field samples and preparing the calibration curve.
5.3.1 Instrument Setup-Before use, clean all glassware, both new and used, as
follows: brush with soap and tap water, liberally rinse with tap water, soak for 1 h
in 50% HN03, and then rinse with deionized distilled water.
Flow Calibration—Assemble the aeration system as shown in
Figure 5.3. Set the outlet pressure on the aeration gas cylinder regulator to a
minimum pressure of 500 mm Hg (10 parts per square inch [psi]); use the flow metering
valve and a bubble flow meter or wet-test meter to obtain a flow rate of 1.5 ± 0.1
L/min through the aeration cell. After the flow calibration is completed, remove the
bubble flow meter from the system.
Optical Cell Heating System Calibration-Using a 25-mL graduated cylinder, add
25 mL of water to the bottle section of the aeration cell. Attach the bottle section
to the bubbler section of the cell. Connect the fferation cell to the optical cell and,
while aerating at 1.5 L/min, determine the minimum variable transformer setting
necessary to prevent condensation in the optical cell and in the connecting tubing.
(This setting should not exceed 20 volts.)
Wavelength Adjustment—Set the spectrophotoraeter wavelength at 253.7 nm and
make certain that the optical cell is at the minimum temperature needed to prevent
water condensation.
Recorder Adjustment—The Hg response may be measured by either peak height or
peak area. Peak height determinations may be performed manually by counting the
recorder paper divisions for a given peak from a best-drawn baseline. The peak height
from the baseline also may be measured conveniently using a millimeter ruler. Peak
area measurements are most conveniently accomplished electronically using an integrator
or similar device. For peak height determinations, set the recorder scale as follows:
Note: The temperature of the solution affects the rate at which elemental Hg is
released from a solution and, consequently, it affects the shape of the generated peak
as well as the peak height. Therefore, to obtain reproducible results using peak
height, bring all solutions to room temperature before use.
o
O
o
-------
Section No. 3.19.5
Date September 3, 1992
Page 9
NEEDLE VALVE FOR
FLOW CONTROL
CYLINDER
CELL
FLOW
METER
EXIT ARM
Hfr
TO HOOD
TO VARIABLE TRANSFORMER
PTICAL CELL
MAGNETIC STIRRING BAR
MAGNETIC STIRRER
Figure 5.3. Schematic of aeration system.
-------
Section No. 3 .19 .5
Date September 3, 195
Page 10
1. Place a Teflon-coated stirring bar in the bottle. Using a 25-cL,
graduated cylinder, add 25 mL of laboratory pure water to the aeration
cell bottle. Pipet 5.0 mL of the working Hg standard solution to the
aeration cell.
2. Add 5 mL of the 4% KMn04 absorbing solution followed by 5 mL of 15% HNO:.
and 5 mL of 5% KMn04 to the aeration cell and mix well using a swirling
motion.
3. Attach the bottle to the aerator making sure that: (1) the exit am
stopcock is closed, and (2) there is no aeration gas flowing through the
bubbler.
4. Through the side arm, add 5 mL of sodium chloride hydroxylamine solution
in 1-mL increments until the solution is colorless.
5. Through the side arm, add 5 mL of the Tin (II) reducing agent to the
aeration cell bottle and immediately stopper the side arm.
6. Stir the solution for 15 s and turn on the recorder or integrator.
7. Open the aeration cell exit arm stopcock and initiate the gas flow.
8. Determine the maximum height (absorbance) of the standard and set this
value to read 90% of the recorder full scale.
5.3.2 Analytical Calibration Curve-After setting the recorder scale (Section 5.3.1! ,
the calibration is performed. To separate aeration cell bottles, add 25 mL cf
laboratory pure water. Then add 0.0-, 1.0-, 2.0-, '3.0-, 4.0-, and 5.0-mL aliquots cf.
the working standard solution using Class A volumetric pipets. This corresponds to C,
200, 400, 600, 800, and 1,000 ng of Hg, respectively. Proceed with the calibration,
following steps 2 through 7 of Section 5.3.1, Recorder Adjustment. Analyze the
calibration standards by measuring the lowest to the highest standard. Be sure tc
allow the recorder pen to return fully to the baseline before the next standard is
analyzed. This step is particularly critical with peak area measurements. Repeat this
procedure on each aliquot size until two consecutive peaks agree within 3% of the
average.
Between sample analyses, place the aerator section into a 600-mL beaker
containing approximately 400 mL of water. Rinse the bottle section of the aeration
cell with a stream of water to remove all traces of the reagents from the previous
sample. These steps are necessary to remove all traces of the reducing agent between
samples to prevent the loss of Hg before aeration. It will be necessary, however, -z
wash the aeration cell parts with concentrated HC1 if any of the following conditions
occur: (I) a white film appears on any inside surface of the aeration cell; (2) the
calibration curve changes suddenly; or (3) the replicate samples do not yield
reproducible results.
- o
-------
Section No. 3.19.5
Date September 3, 1992
Page 11
Recorder or integrator responses should be documented on the analytical data
form for Calibraxon Standards (Figure 5.4) . Subtract the average peak height (or peak
area) of the measurement blank (0.0-mL aliquot) -which should be less than 2% of
recorder full scale— from the averaged peak heights of the 1.0-, 2.0-, 3.0-, 4. 0-, and
5.0-mL aliquot standards. If the blank absorbance is greater than 2% of full-scale,
the probable cause is Hg contamination of a reagent or carry-over of Hg from a
previous sample. Plot the corrected peak height of each standard solution versus the
corresponding total Hg mass in the aeration cell (in ng) .
Calculating the measured standard Hg mass (P) may be performed in two ways:
a linear regression program provided by a hand calculator (or other computing device)
or the manual least squares method described below: . . ..
P = (S) (Y) Equation 5-1
where :
Y = Peak height or integrator response, mm or counts.
S = Response factor, ng/mm or ng/counts (from Equation 5-2) .
-*
and > ' ""
*iy i +X2y2-Hx3y3 +x4y 4 +xsy 5+x6y 6
S = - Equation 5-2
where :
x = Standard mass value,' ng.
Complete the analytical data form for analyzing calibration standards (Figure
5.4) for each standard. Calculate the deviation of each standard measurement average
from the expected value (standard mass value), x. If the percent deviation from the
expected value is greater than 5% for any standard measurement, the calibration must
be repeated.
5.3.3 QC Operations— The quality of the analytical results can be assessed by
analyzing a variety of standard reference solutions (SRMs) of known high accuracy, such
as those available from the National Institute Standards and Technology (NIST) and
other government agencies. Standard solutions prepared by commercial suppliers that
meet NIST traceability criteria are also useful.'- If these solutions are not available,
the analysis of laboratory-prepared standard solutions may be used from a source
(supplier) other than the source of the calibration standards. These solutions will
be known as QC solutions. For example, if the calibration standards were prepared by
dilutions of a 100 mg Hg/mL solution from supplier A (or from an in-house prepared
solution from the pure mercury salt), then a QC solution might be prepared from
dilutions of one of the following:
1. An NIST Hg solution or other SRM.
-------
Section No. 3 .19.5
Date September 3, 1952
Page 12
o
Plant Location
Date Analyst
Standard
Identifier
Std 1
Std 2
Std 3
Std 4
Std 5
Std 6
Standard
mass
(x)
(ng Hg)
0
200
400
|_
600
800
1000
Integrator Response
Peak Height or Area
(y) , (mm)
1
2
,
Avg
1
..rl
1
1 ''
Measured
Standard
mass
(P)
(ng Hg)
Deviation
(%)
1
!
I
I
Equation for Linear Calibration Curve, Average Response as a function of standard
concentration.
O
y = mx + b = (
)x + (
where:
y = Instrument curve slope mm or area count =
ng Hg
x = Standard concentration (ng Hg) =
b = I = Intercept term (mm or area count) =
Measured Standard Concentration (P)
Equation 1
Equation 2
Equation 3
Equation 4
P(ng Hg) = Average Instrument Response (y) - Intercept (I)
Calibration Curve Slope
ng Hg
Ecuatior. 3
Deviation
Deviation (%) = P (nq Hq) - x (no Hq) x 100%
x (ng Hg)
Deviation = (
) x 100% =
Ecuatior. €
O
Figure 5.4. Analytical data form for analysis of calibration standards.
-------
Section No. 3.19.5
Date September 3, 1992
Page 13
2. A commercial QC solution that has been tested against an NIST solution
(or equivalent) by manufacturer A.
3. A 1,000-mg Hg/mL solution from manufacturer B.
Record analytical data for QC samples on Figure 5.5. QC solutions may be used
for a variety of analytical accuracy assessments. These include three check samples
(Check Sample A, B, and C):
A. Checks of the accuracy of the calibration operations, ChecJc Sample
A—When analyzed immediately following the calibration, the measured QC
sample value must be within 5% of the expected value described in this
section, or the calibration must be repeated. These QC samples are
known as Initial Calibration Verification (ICVs) Check samples.
B. Checks of the drift of the calibration, Check Sample B-For any of a wide
variety of conditions that may be related to instrument warmup or
instrument component deterioration, :the repeated analysis of a given
sample or standard will vary over time. To ensure thit the analysis is
"in control," a QC solution is measured at least every five samples.
If the average measured value of the QC solution has changed by more
than 10% from the expected value, the causes must be identified and
corrected. The calibration is then repeated, and all samples analyzed
since the last successful "drift"_rQC sample analysis must be repeated..
This "drift" QC sample is known as a CCV sample. It is worth noting
that the CCV need not be a "standard" type solution; any Hg-containing
solution may be used for the CCV, provided the Hg level in the aeration
cell is between 200 and 1,000 ng. Again, the measured value of this
solution must not vary more than 10% from the expected value.
C. Measuring spike recovery check sample, Check Sample C—Spiking a digested
sample (a prepared sample) with a standard solution provides a means of
assessing Hg recovery associated with the measurement process (sample
matrix effect). The steps below must be followed to determine spike
recovery:
a. After completing all sample preparation steps in Subsections 5.2.1
and 5.2.2, spike a 10-mL aliquot of Analysis Sample No. A.I with 10
mL of spiking solution containing a similar concentration of Hg, or
with 10 mL of a spike at least 10 tiroes greater than the detection
limit, whichever is greater.
b. Spike a 10-mL aliquot of Analysis Sample No. HC1 A.2 with 10 mL of
spiking solution containing a similar concentration of Hg as the
field sample, or a spike at least 10 times greater than the
detection limit, whichever is greater.
c. After all samples are analyzed, subtract the results of the spiked
and unspiked samples. If this spike is not within 15% of the expe-
cted value, then the Hg response may be owing to matrix effects. If
so, all sample digests must be analyzed by the method of standard
additions (MSA).
f\
i
v:
-------
Date samples
Plant
received Date samples analyzed
Run number (s)
Location Analyst
Calibration factor (S) Intercept (I), if applicable
QC
Sample
Number
Analysis
Number
Instrument
Response
(mm)
Deviation of replicate measurements, (%)
Mass of QC sample
without intercept
(ng Hg)
Mass of QC sample
with intercept
Mean
Instrument
Response
(mm)
Mean
Instrument
Response (Mass
Percent Blank Dilution QC
Deviation Corrected Factor Sample
(ng Hg) (y) (F) (ng Hg)
(A, - A2)
x 100
A, -f A,
2
- ( ) - ( ) 100 =
( ) + ( )
2
v o to
$i 01 (f)
- S x v x F 0 Z ~
— o-A.yJvr (liOfT
= _ „,- X X ......... = f-1 rn O
rr 2
S o
= S (y - I) F §•'
i - \ - V. w
(ng Hg)
O
Figure 5.5. Analytical data form for analysis of QC samples.
ID
K)
O
-------
Section No. 3.19.5
Date September 3, 1992
Page 15
Operations involving the use of QC samples are described in more detail below.
Note that spikes always must be measured using the linear portion of the calibration
curve (as with actual samples) . QC samples with Hg values exceeding the linear portion
of the calibration curve must be diluted and reanalyzed according to the sample
analysis procedure (Subsection 5.4.3).
Preparing the ICV Solutions—If the source of the ICV is a commercial
1,000-mg/mL stock solution, it must be diluted according to the procedure described in
Subsection 1.5.3 for intermediate and working standard solutions.
Measuring the ICV Solution-Analyze a 2- to 5-mL aliquot (i.e., 200-500 ng Hg)
of the ICV working standard solution (some mid-point aliquot). Duplicate measurements
should agree within 3% of the average. If not, determine the cause for error (consult
the laboratory supervisor if necessary), correct the problem, and recalibrate the
analysis system. Repeat as necessary. If the QC solution source is not a 1,000-mg
Hg/mL stock solution, prepare the intermediate QC solution (QC working solution) as
follows:
1. Pour about 15 mL of the solution into a clean beaker. NOTE: To avoid
contamination, do not pipet directly from the bottle.
2. Pipet (using a glass pipet of at least 5-mL volume) an appropriate
aliquot into a suitable clean glass volumetric flask, according to Table
5.2. Pipet 2 mL of the QC working solution for measurement. Use Table
5.2 to determine the expected values for the QC sample (ICV) .
Preparing and Measuring the Initial Blank Verification (IBV) and Continuing
Blank Verification (CBV)-Vlith the conventional measurement system, these verifications
"'''' may be performed merely by adding 50 mL of water, hydroxylamine sulfate solution, and
stannous chloride as described in Subsection 5.3.2.
Preparing and Measuring Spiked Sample, Check Sample C—To determine whether
there are sample matrix effects during the measurement, one sample digest must be
analyzed in the presence of added Hg. The added (spiked) Hg recovery must be within
85-115%, or the MSA must be employed for each sample and blank digest.
-------
TABLE 5.2 PREPARATION OF QC SOLUTIONS
Certitied value of
QC source solution
(ng Hg/mL)
<1
1-5
5-20
20-100
Aliquot of QC
source solution
for dilution, (mL)
A
5
5
5
Dilution
Volume, mL
vd
100
250
1000
QC working
solution
concentration
using Eq. 1
(ng Hg/mL)
cu,
Volume of
working solution
taken for
analysis, (mL)
«
2
2
2
2
Expected
value, (n
using Eq.
M
Hg
g)
2
where:
where:
Cws
cecd
vd
A
M.
M
'Hg
£std
Vd
x_A
Concentration of QC "working" solution (WSQC), ng Hg/mL.
Concentration in ng Hg/mL of QC source solution ' (QC).
Dilution volume in mL.
Aliquot of QC source solution added to volumetric flask in mL.
Cw. x VB.
Expected ng Hg in aeration flask.
Aliquot of Cw, taken for measurement, mL.
Equation 1
Equation 2
>o o en
P> P> (D
iq rr o
(K n> rr
H-
M Cfl 0
0*3
rt Z
n o
O
o
O"
-------
below:
Section 3.19.5
Date April 3, 1992
Page 17
The procedure used to determine the existence of matrix effects is described
1. Analyze an aliquot of the sample and record the sample aliquot size used
(see Subsection 5.4.3).
2. Calculate the Hg content in ng of the sample aliquot.
3. Determine a working standard aliquot size that equals or exceeds the
sample response from Step 2.
4. Add the value determined from Step 3 to an additional sample aliquot
identical to that used in Step 1.
5. Analyze this spiked sample and record the response.
6. The spike recovery is calculated as follows:
% Recovery
= C spiked sample -
C spike
C sample x 100
Equation 5-3
where;
C spiked sample
C sample
C spike
= Measured Hg in spiked sample, mg.
= Measured Hg in -onspiked sample, mg.
= Hg added to sample, mg.
Note: To ensure the validity of the spike measurement, it is imperative that
the measurement result fall within the range of the calibration.
Method of Standard Addition Analysis—If the recovery result obtained from the
section above on the measurement of spiked samples falls outside the 85-115% range,
then the MSA must be employed for all sample digest measurements. This procedure is
described below:
1. Repeat steps 1 and 2 of spiked sample measurement above to determine the
level of Hg in the sample (designated S0),r ;
2. To a second, identical sample aliquot, add a working standard volume
that contains a Hg level that is approximately 50% of the sample Hg
level. Refer to this spiked sample as Slf and record the exact aliquot
volume of sample and working standard.used.
3. Analyze spiked sample (Sj) .
4. To another, identical sample aliquot, add a working standard aliquot
that contains an Hg level that is approximately equal to that of the
sample. Refer to this spiked sample as S2, and record the exact aliquot
volume of sample and working standard used.
5. Analyze the spiked sample (S2) .
6. To another, identical sample aliquot, add a working standard aliquot
that contains an Hg level that is approximately 1.5 times that at the
sample. Refer to this spiked sample as S3, and record the exact aliquot
volume of sample and working standard used.
7. Analyze the spiked sample (S3) .
8. The peak intensity of each solution is determined and plotted on the
vertical axis of a graph. The concentrations of the known standards, are
plotted on the horizontal axis. When the resulting line is extrapolated
back to zero absorbance, the point of interception of the abscissa is
the concentration of the unknown. The abscissa on the left of the
-------
Section 3.19
Date April 3,
Page 18
1992
o
ordinate is scaled the same as on the right side, but in the opposite
direction from the ordinate. An example is shown in Figure 5.6.
u
c
ca
&
i-i
0
c/1
A
<
Zero
Absorb
Concen'
of Sa
ance s^[
/
1
f
_-
\ \
«,
r i
i Mass (ng)
Addition 0 Addn 1 Addn 2 Addn 3
-ration No addition50* Qf 100% of 150X of
mple Expected Expected Expected
Amount Amount Amount
O
STANDARD ADDITION PLOT
Figure 5.6. Method of standard additions for field samples.
To perform a valid MSA analysis, three criteria must be met:
1. The MSA standard curve must be linear using the criteria in Subsection
5.3.2.
2. The spiking level of Hg must be at least 50% of Hg in the sample.
3. The spiking level must be at least 10 times the detection lirr.it
(approximately 20 ng).
O
-------
Section 3.19.5
Data April 3, 1992
Page 19
5.3.4 Field Sample Analysis-Repeat the procedure used to establish the calibration
curve with an appropriately sized aliquot (1 to 5 mL) of the diluted sample until" two
consecutive peak heights agree as follows:
Hg mass, ng Limits (% deviation from average)
<5 50
5-15 15
15-100 ; 5
>100 3
/ An aliquot peak maximum (except the 5-mL aliquot) must be greater than 10% of
the recorder full scale. If the peak maximum of a 1-mL aliquot is off scale on the
recorder, further dilute the original source sample to bring the Hg concentration into
the calibration range of the spectrophotometer.
Run a CBV and a CCV at least after every five samples to check the
spectrophotometer calibration drift; recalibrate as necessary (see Subsection 5.3.3).
It is recommended that at least one sample from 'each stack test be checked by the
method of standard additions to confirm that matrix effects have not interfered with
the analysis (see Subsection 5.3.3). Record alKriata for field sample analysis on.the
Method 101A field analysis data form, Figure 5.7, >or similar form. • \
Analysis Samples No. A.I and HCl A.2—After sample preparation of each sample
run, two sample fractions must be analyzed for Hg to determine the total ng of Hg.
Analysis Sample No. A.I is the filtrate of the KMnO< absorbing solution and rinse and
the digestate of the glass fiber filter, if applicable. Analysis Sample No. A.I will
be 1,000 mL or more, measured to within 1 mL. Analysis Sample ,,Nor. HCl A.2 is f the
digestate of residue and; Whatman 40 filter paper and HCl rinse, if applicable.
Analysis Sample No. HCl A.2 will be 500 mL. A recommended sequence of analysis is
presented in Table 5.3.;
Analysis Samples No. A.I Blank and HCl A.2 Blank-Each test series requires
that a sample blank be taken. The sample blank is prepared in the same manner as the
field samples. The analysis of the sample blank will have the same two 'fractions as
each field sample. The blank will be analyzed at the same time and in the same manner
as the field samples, with the exception that a 10-mL aliquot shall be used for
analysis. A recommended sequence of analysis is presented in Table 5.3.
Container No. 2 (Silica Gel)4-Weigh the spent silica gel (or silica gel plus
impinger) to the nearest 0.5 g using a balance. (This step may be conducted in the
field.)
-------
Date samples received
Date samples analyzed
Plant Run number (s)
Location Analyst
Calibration factor (S) Intercept (I), if applicable
Field
Sample (Analysis
Number
,
Number
Instrument
Response
(mm)
Mean
Instrument
Response
(mm)
(A,
Deviation of replicate measurements. (%) =
A,
_ _£_
(
Percent
Deviation
(ng Hg)
.
Mean
Instrument
Response
Blank
Corrected
(y)
JMass
Dilution
Factor
(F)
Field
Sample
(ng Hg)
- A2)
x .100
+ A,
2
) - ( ) 100 =
) 4 ( )
2
Mass of QC sample
without intercept
(ng Hg)
Mass of QC sample
with intercept
(ng Hg)
= S x y x F
x
O
= S (y - I) F
Figure 5.7. Analytical data form far analysis of field samples.
•ti a tn
pi fu ID
id rr n
eo (o rt
H-
to > o
0-0 3
10
VO
(O
O
-------
Section 3.19.5
Date April 3, 1992
Page 21
TABLE 5.3 RECOMMENDED ANALYTICAL SEQUENCE"
Sequence No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
J) "
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Sample ID
IBV
repeat
ICV
repeat
ccvb
repeat
A.I blank
repeat
HC1, A. 2 blank
repeat
A.I, Run 1
repeat
A.I Spike, Run le
repeat
HC1 A. 2 Run ,lc „,
repeat*3
CCV
repeat
CBV
repeat
Sequence No.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 \
\
29
30
31
32
33
34 ^
' ::" 35 ~; . -,
Sample ID
HC1 A. 2, Run 1 spike
repeat
A.I, Run 2
repeat
HC1 A. 2, Run 2 '
repeat
A.I, Run 3
repeat
HC1 A. 2, Run 3
repeat
CCV
repeat
CBV
repeat
Repeat Calibration"1 '
"Assuming a valid calibration has been performed.
blf different-than ICV. ,t, ,
^Any A.I spike from runs 1, 2, or 3. ,-.-
this point, if the recovery is 85 to 115%, proceed to Step 26; if
,ot, all samples must be run /using MSA (Subsection 5.3.3).
-------
Section 3 .19 . 5
Date April 3, 1992
Page 22
5.4 Alternate Analytical Apparatus
Alternative systems are allowable as long as they meet the following criteria:
5.4.1 Measurement Technique—The system is based on cold vapor atomic absorption
techniques.
5.4.2 Analyte Recovery—Eighty-five-115% of the spike is recovered when an aliquot
of a source sample is spiked with a known concentration of Hg (II) compound.
5.4.3 Calibration Curve—A linear calibration curve is generated and two consecutive
standards of the same aliquot size and concentration agree within the following limits.
Hg mass, ng/mL Limits (% deviation from average)
10 3
5.4.4 Sensitivity—The system is capable of detecting 0.2 ng Hg/mL for flow-injection
systems or 20 ng Hg for batch systems.
o
•O
i--u«^>—<
An example of a flow-injection analytical system is depicted in Figure 1
Note that these systems inject samples in a semicontinuous manner; consequently, the
solution concentration is monitored, not the total Hg in the entire sample. Therefore,
the total Hg in a given sample digest is calculated as follows:
MHa = CHg x V Equation 5-4
where:
MHg = Total mg Hg in each sample digest from Section 5.2.
CHg = Measured concentration in mg Hg/mL.
V = Total volume in milliliters of the sample digest.
These calculations are shown in Section 3.19.6.
5.4.5 Data Quality Assessment for Alternate Analytical Systems-QC solutions used to
determine the accuracy of the calibration may be measured directly without performing
the calculations described in Subsection 5.3.3. This procedure, of course, is based
on the assumption that the sample concentration value does not exceed that of the
highest calibration standard, thereby requiring a dilution.
O
-------
follows:
Section 3.19.5
Date April 3, 1992
Page 23
Determining matrix effects on the measurement recovery is performed as
1. Determine the Hg concentration in the sample digest.
2. Remove two 10-mL aliquots of the digest and place in clean 20-mL
beakers.
3. To one aliquot, add 1 mL of distilled deionized water and mix by
swirling the beaker (S0) . — -
4. To the other aliquot, add 1 mL of a standard that is 10 to 20 times the
solution concentration of the sample; mix the beaker contents (S^ .
5. Measure both solutions for Hg content.
6. The recovery of the added spike is as follows:
% Recovery
Ms, - Mso
X 100
Equation 5-5
where:
MSO
= mg Hg in spiked sampler
\
= mg Hg/mL in St x 11 mL.
= mg Hg in sample spiked with water.
= mg Hg/mL (of spiking solution) x 1 mL.
The recovery should'be between 85-115%. Otherwise, the method of additions
must be employed for each sample of the sample run. --
Method of Additions—In this method, equal volumes of sample are added to a DI
water blank and to three standards containing different known amounts of the test
element. The volume of the blank and the standards must be the same. The absorbance
(peak height, counts, etc.) of each solution is determined and then plotted on the
vertical axis of a graph. The concentration of the known standards are plotted on the
horizontal axis. When the resulting line is extracted back to zero absorbance, the
point of interception of the abscissa is the concentration of the unknown. The
abscissa on the left of the ordinate is scaled the same as on the right side, but in
the opposite direction from the ordinate. An example is shown in figure 5.6. .......
5.5
Posttest Checklist
Posttest checklists for QC sample analysis and field sample analysis are
presented in figures 5.8 and 5.9. .
-------
Section 3.19.5
Date April 3, 1992
Page 24
o
QC Sample Analysis Checklist
Date Plant Name Sampling Location
Calibration Standards and Matrix Checks
Mercury Stock Solution, 1 rag Hg/mL:
Prepared in-house'? (Y/N)
Source of mercury (II) chloride
Commercial stock solution? (Y/N)
Source
Intermediate Mercury Standard Solution, 10 mg/mL:
Date prepared
Used glass pipet? (Y/N)
Source and grade of HNO3
Working Mercury Standard Solution, 200 ng Hg/mL:
Prepared today? (Y/N)
Used glass pipet? (Y/N)
Calibration Standards:
mL of working standards volume of volumetric flask, mL
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5 •
#6
#7
Instrumentation:
Spectrophotometer type
O
Moisture Removal System:
Optical cell heating system? Calibrated?
Moisture trap used? What type?
Data Recording System:
Recorder Integrator Other
Describe
Peak height Peak area
O
Figure 5.8. QC sample analysis.
-------
Section 3.19.5
Date April 3, 1992
Page 25
Cold Vapor Generation System:
Standard batch system?
Alternate system?
Describe alternate system?
Aeration gas .... Aeration gas flow
Gas cylinder? . Peristaltic pump?
Standardization:
Glass pipets used? _
mL of . Standard value* ... ?.••*:;•?. .»• •; .
working standard .... -*(hg) ' •"••"•' Reading 1 ;': Reading 2 %Difference
"If using an alternate system that uses flow injection this value may be expressed as
concentration, e.g., |ig/L, ng/L, etc.
Calibration coefficient - -
Offset at origin (measured response of calibration blank) ng or % of scale.
Initial Calibration Verification (ICV) ; "' '
QC check sample source
Certified or expected concentration
Measured concentration
% Difference ''"' • .;'
Initial Calibration Blank Verification (IBV);
Measured value
Below detection limit?
Matrix Interference Check:
Method of additions performed for one test site sample?
Spike added
Spike recovered
% recovery = Spiked sample value - unspiked sample value =
spike value
Figure 5.8. (Continued)
-------
Section 3.19.5
Date April 3, 1992
Page 26
o
If the recovery was outside of 85-115%, were samples run using the method of standard
additions?
Describe ..
Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) - Check sample of standard to be reanalyzed
after every five samples:
Standard used (source) .
Expected value/unit
Was measured value/unit always within 10% of expected value?
Final Standardization:
Glass pipets used?
mL of Standard value"
working standard (ng) Reading 1 Reading 2 %Difference
O
"Alternate analytical systems may express Hg value as a concentration (e.g., mg/L Hg).
Calibration coefficient
Offset at origin ng or % of scale.
Figure 5.8. (Continued)
O
-------
Section 3.19.5
Date April 3, 1992
Page 27
Sample Analysis Checklist " ~" '
Date • Time ._ Operator ••• Observer _______^___
Sample Analysis
Were all sample digests analyzed within 48 h of preparation? _____( Y/N)
Were 10 mL of samples A.I blank and HC1 A. 2 blank used as a minimum?
_ (Y/N)
Were duplicate measurements performed as a minimum for all blank and sample digests?
Did duplicate measurements meet the "percent difference" criteria outlined in Table 5.2
_ (Y/N)
Was the largest possible aliquot (20 mL) used when a measurement was below the
detection limit? _ (Y/N)
If a sample measurement exceeded the highest calibration standard, were appropriately
smaller aliquots always taken to ensure that results fell within the calibration range?
_ (Y/N)
If 1-mL aliquots taken for measurement still were off scale, were sample digests
diluted so that results were within the linear range of the standards? (Y/N)
What volumetric glassware (pipets) was used to add sample digests to the aeration
flasks? _ (mL) '
What volumetric glassware (pipets/ flasks) was used to dilute sample digests? _______
__ (if necessary) ,
If the calibration check samples differed by greater than 10% of the expected values,
was the system recalibrated? (Y/N)
Were CBV and CCV samples analyzed after ever five samples? _ (Y/N)
Were all samples run after the previously CBV and CCV sample analyses? . --
_ (Y/N) '
Was the full standardization performed at the end of the sample analysis? _ (Y/N)
Figure 5.9. Method 101A sample analysis checklist.
<
-------
Section 3.19 .5
Date April 3, 1992
Page 28
o
TABLE 5.1 ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Characteristic
Sample
preparation
All
calibrations
1
1
(Acceptance limits
1
| Samples and
(blanks prepared
I under same
| conditions
1
1
|(1) Reagents and
(volumes used
(during
(measurement of
| samples and
Frequency & method
of measurement
Dilute samples so
that matrix
concentrations are
are identical to
original sample
(Action if
| requirements
| are not met
I
(Adjust
(dilutions, if
(possible;
(otherwise report
(to Administrator
1
| Reanalyze
| samples
j
1
1
(standards are (digest |
| identical
1
| (2) Perform
.— • ' '
•-
Prepare fresh
| 6 -point (daily
(calibration curve
I including
(calibration blank
1
I (3) Calibration
(coefficient
(better than 0.999
'
Each calibration
point is the
average of
( (duplicate
1
1
1
| Prepare fresh
(daily
1 /
1 (
1
(Repeat
(calibration
1
1
| (measurements |
1 1
Calibration
Verification
Check Samples
(ICV)
Calibration
Blanks
(Analysis within (Analyze after
| 5% of expected or
I certified value
1
1
every calibration
(Must be below (Analyze after
(detection limit
Verification I
(IBV)
Continuing
Calibration
Verification
Sample
(CCV)
1
I
I
every
calibration
(Must be within (Analyze after
J10% of expected
(value
1
|
1
every 5th sample
(Ensure quality
(of check sample
| or repeat
| calibration
(check for
(potential
(contamination
(and repeat
| calibration
1
| Repeat
| calibration
(and repeat all
(samples since
| last successful .,
|CCV analysis v __ {
O
o
(Continued)
-------
Section 3.19.5
Date April 3, 1992
Page 29
TABLE 5.1 (Continued)
Characteristic
Continuing
Blank
Verification
(CSV)
Matrix check
sample
Duplicate
measurements
Data recording
Acceptance limits
Must be below
detection limit
Recovery of
sample digest
spike 85-115%
See Subsec.
5.3.2
All pertinent
data recorded
on figs. 5.1, 5.2
Frequency & method
of measurement
Analyze after
every 5th sample
One sample digest
from every stack
test is spiked at
a level at least
equal to sample
digest
conccntrat ion
All standard and
sample analyses
Visually check
(Action if
| requirements
(are not met
1
1 Repeat
(calibration
land repeat all
(samples since
I last successful
|CBV analysis
!
(Analyze all
(samples using
|the method of
| standard
(additions
1
1
(Repeat until
| agreement is
| achieved
1
(Supply missing
(data
1
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.19.6
Date September 3, 1992
Page 1
6.0
CALCULATIONS
Calculation errors resulting from procedural or mathematical mistakes can be
a part of total system error. Therefore, it is recommended that each set of calcula-
tions be repeated or spotchecked, preferably by a team member other than the one who
performed the original calculations. If a difference greater than typical round-off
error is detected, the calculations should be checked step-by-step until the source of
error is found and corrected.
Calculations should be carried out to at least one extra decimal figure beyond
that of the acquired data and should be rounded off after final calculation to two
significant digits for each run or sample. All rounding of numbers should be performed
in accordance with the ASTM 380-76 procedures.
A computer program is advantageous in reducing calculation errors. If a
program is used, the original data entered should be included in the printout for
review. If differences are observed, a new computer run should be made. A computer
program also is useful in maintaining a standardized format for reporting results. The
data shown will allow auditing the calculations.
Table 6.1 at the end of this section summarizes the QA activities for
calculations. -*~ .
In the next section, nomenclature and equations have been divided into two
groups. The first group (Section 3.19.6.1 to 3.19.6.4) deals with sampling calcula-
tions. The second group (Section 3.19.6.5 to 3.19.6.13) deals with analytical and
emissions calculations.
6.1
Sampling Nomenclature from Method 5
An
Bw,
I
L.
L,
R
Cross-sectional area of nozzle, m2 (ft2).
Water vapor in the gas stream, proportion by volume.
Percent of isokinetic sampling.
Maximum acceptable leakage rate for either a pretest leak check or
for a leak check following a component change, equal to 0.00057
mVmin (0.02 cfm) or 4% of the average sampling rate, whichever is
less.
Individual leakage rate observed during the leak check conducted
prior to the "ith" component change (i = 1, 2, 3...n), mVrnin (cfm).
Leakage rate observed during the posttest leak check, mVmin (cfm).
Molecular weight of water, 18.0 g/g-mole (18.0 Ib/lbmole) .
Barometric pressure at the sampling site, mm Hg (in. Hg).
Absolute stack gas pressure, mm Hg (in. Hg).
t,
Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg) .
Ideal gas constant, 0.06236 [ (mm Hg) (m3) ] / [ (°K) (g-mole) ] {21.85 [(-
in. Hg) (ftJ)]/H°R) (lb-mole)]}.
-------
Section No. 3 .19.6
Date September 3, 1992
Page 2
Tm = Absolute average DGM temperature, °K (°R).
T. = Absolute average stack gas temperature, °K (°R).
T,ld = Standard absolute temperature, 293 °K (528R).
V,c = Total volume liquid collected in impingers and silica gel, mL.
Vm = Volume of gas sample as measured by dry-gas meter, dcm (dcf).
vm.tdi = Volume of gas sample measured by the dry-gas meter, corrected to
standard conditions, dscm (dscf).
Vwi.cdi = Volume of water vapor in the gas sample, corrected to standard
conditions, scm (scf).
vs = Stack-gas velocity, calculated by Method 2, Equation 2-9, using
data obtained from Method 5, m/s (ft/s).
Y = Dry-gas meter calibration factor.
AH = Average pressure differential across the orifice meter, mm H20 (in.
H20).
pw = Density of water, 0.9982 g/mL (0.002201 Ib/mL).
6 = Total sampling time, min.
o
o
6j = Sampling time interval, from the beginning of a run until the first
component change, min.
6, = Sampling time interval, between two successive component changes,
beginning with the interval between the first and second changes,
min.
6P = Sampling time interval, from the final (nth) component change until
the end of the sampling run, min.
13.6 = Specific gravity of mercury.
60 = S/min.
100 = Conversion to %.
O
-------
6.2
6.3
6.4
Section No. 3.19.6
Date September 3, 19S2
Page 3
Conversion Factors
From
scf
g/ft3
g/ft3
g/ftj
To
m3
gr/ft3
lb/ft3
g/m3
Multiply by
0.02832
15.43
2.205 x 10°
35.31
Average Dry-Gas Meter Temperature and Average Orifice Pressure Drop
See data sheet (Figure 4.1).
Dry-Gas Volume
Correct the sample volume measured by the dry-gas meter to standard conditions
(20 °C, 760 mm Hg or 68 °F, 29.92 in. Hg) by using Equation 6-1.
^ AH ,
V=VmY
V = K, Vu Y
Equation 6-1
where:
Kj = 0.3858 °K/mm Hg for metric units.
• = 17.64 °R/in Hg for English, units.
Note: Equation 6-1 can be used as written unless the leakage rate observed
during any of the mandatory leak checks (i.e., the posttest leak check or leak-checks
conducted prior to component changes) exceeds La. If Lp or L, exceeds La, Equation 6-1
must be modified as follows:
(a) Case I. No component changes made during sampling run. In this case, replace Vj
in Equation 6-1 with the expression:
[V, - (L. - La) 6]
-------
Section No. 3 .19 .6
Date September 3, 199
Page 4
o
(b) Case II. One or more component changes made during the sampling run. In this
case, replace Vm in Equation 6-1 by the expression:
(V. - (L, - La) 81 - (L, -La) 6, - (Lp - L.) 8p]
1-2
and substitute only for those leakage rates (L, or Lp) that exceed La.
6 . 5 Volume of Water Vapor
Vw(.td, = vic ^V^ = K2 Vle Equation 6-2
l-Lu CBtd
where :
K2 = 0.001333 rn'/mL for metric units.
= 0.04707 ftVmL for English units":"
6.6 Moisture Content
B = V"'stdl Equation 6-3
us 17 nTlT
vm(std)
O
Note: In saturated or water droplet-laden gas streams, calculate the moisture
content of the stack gas in two ways: from the impinger analysis (Equation 6-3) and
from the assumption of saturated conditions. The lower for B,,. shall be considered
correct. The procedure for determining the moisture content based upon assumption of
saturated conditions is given in the Note of Section 1.2, Method 4. For the purposes
of this method, the average stack-gas temperature from Figure 4.2 may be used to make
this determination, provided that the accuracy of the in-stack temperature sensor is
± 1 °C (2 °F).
6.7 Nomenclature from Method 2
A = Cross-sectional area of stack, m2 (ft2).
BU5 = Water vapor in the gas stream (from Method 5 or Reference Method
4), proportion by volume.
Ct. = Pitot tube coefficient, dimensionless.
K,, = Pitot tube constant - 34.97 for the metric system and 85.49 for
the English system.
Mj = Molecular weight of stack gas, dry basis (see Section 3.1
g/g-mole (Ib/lb-mole).
Mf = Molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis, g/g-mole (Ib/lb-mole).
-------
Section No. 3.19.6
Date September 3, 1992
Page 5
= Ma (1 - BW9) + 18.0 Bw,
Pb.r = Barometric pressure at measurement site, mm Hg (in. Hg) .
Pg = stack static pressure, mm Hg (in. Hg) .
P. = Absolute stack pressure, mm Hg (in. Hg) ,
D
6.8
P.td
Q.d
TBld
vs
Ap
3,600
18.0
= Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg) .
= Dry volumetric stack gas flow rate corrected to standard condi
tions, dsmVh (dscf/h) .
= Stack temperature, °C (°F) .
= Absolute stack temperature, °K (°R).
= 273 4- t, for metric. -*"
= 460 -*• t. for English.
= Standard absolute temperature, 293 °K (528 °R) .
= Average stack gas velocity, m/sec (ft/s) .
= Velocity head of stack gas, mm H20 (in. H20) .
= Conversion factor, s/h.
= Molecular weight of water, g/g-mole (Ib/lb-mole) .
Average Stack Gas Velocity
V *
CP <
Ts (avg)
Equation 6-4
-------
6.9
6.10
Average Stack Gas, Dry Volumetric Flow Rate
Q = 3600 (l-Bus) vsA
Isokinetic Variation
6.10.1 Calculation from Raw Data-
100 T
I =
V2c + (Vm -
/n
60 fc) vs
Section No. 3.19.6
Date September 3, 1952
Page 6
o
Equation 6-5
Equation 6-6
where:
6.10.2
K3 = 0.003454 [(mm Hg) (m3)]/[(mL) (°K)] for metric units.
-*"*
= 0.002669 [(in. Hg) (ft3)]/[(mL)(°R)], for English units.
Calculation from Intermediate Values-
J =
T , v
•'•std vs
\n Pe 60 (1 - Bus)
Equation 6
-O
= K,
v
's ^m(std)
Equation 6-E
where:
6.11
K4 = 4.320 for metric units.
= 0.09450 for English units.
Acceptable Results
If 90%
-------
Section No. 3.19 .6
Date September 3, 1992
Page 7
6.12
Method...1.Q 1A Calculations
6.12.1 Determining Compliance-Each performance test consists of three repetitions of
the applicable test method. For the purpose of determining compliance with an
applicable national emission standard, use the average of the results of all
repetitions.
6.12.2 Total Hg-For each source sample, correct the average maximum absorbance of the
two consecutive samples whose peak heights agreed within 3% of their average for the
contribution of the blank. Then calculate the total Hg content in \ig in each sample.
Correct for any dilutions made to bring the sample into the working range of the
spectrophotometer. -•'-
m
[C
(HCl)Hg
(HCl}Hg
DF]
where:
m
(HCUH9
•(HCl blklHg
DF
DFh
[C
(HCl blklHg
DFblk]
S
10
-3
Equation 6-9
blk
Total blank corrected Jig of Hg in HCl rinse and HCl digestate
of filter sample.
Total ng of Hg analyzed in the aliquot from the 500-mL Analysis
Sample No. HCl A.2. :
Total ng of Hg analyzed in aliquot of.the 500-mL Analysis Sample
No HCl A.2 blank.
Dilution factor for the HCl digested Hg-containing solution,
Analysis Sample No. HCl A.2. This dilution factor (DF) applies
only to the intermediate dilution steps because the original
sample volume (Vf)HC1 of HCl A.2 has been factored out in the
equation, along with the sample aliquot, (S) . In Equation 6.9,
the sample aliquot, S, is introduced directly into the aeration
cell for analysis according to the procedure outlined in Section
3.19.5.3.4. A dilution factor is required only if it is
necessary to bring the sample into the analytical instrument's
calibration range. If no dilution is necessary, then DF equals
1.0.
Dilution factor for the HCl digested solution, Analysis Sample
No. HCl A.2 blank. (Note: Normal dilution factor calculations
apply here.)
Solution volume of original Analysis Sample No. HCl A.2 andkHCl
A.2 blank, 500 ml, for samples diluted as described in Section
5.2.2.4 of this document.
10'
= Conversion factor, ug/ng.
-------
Section No. 3.19. 6
Date September 3, 1BS2
Page 8
S = Aliquot volume of sample added to aeration cell, mL.
Sb)k = Aliquot volume of blank added to aeration cell, mL.
Note: The maximum allowable blank subtraction for the HC1 is the lesser of the
two following values: (1) the actual blank measured value (Analysis Sample No. HC1 A.2
blank); or (2) 5% of the Hg content in the combined HC1 rinse and digested sample
(Analysis Sample No. HC1 A.2).
o
'imriHj
V
[([ltr].
where:
blk)Hg
'
10
-3
yblk
Equation 6-1C
(f UrlHg
-If llrlHg
Mfltr blklHg
= Total blank corrected (Jg "of Hg in KMn04 filtrate and HN03 di-
gestion of filter sample.
= Total ng of Hg in aliquot of KMnO4 filtrate and HN03 digesticr.
of filter analyzed (aliquot of Analysis Sample A.I).
-o
= Total ng of Hg in aliquot of KMnO< blank and HNO, digestion cf
blank filter analyzed (aliquot of Analysis Sample No. A.I
blank).
Vt((Url = Solution volume of original sample, normally 1000 mL fcr
samples diluted as described in Section 7.3.2 of Method 101A.
V,lblkl = Solution volume of blank sample, 1000 mL for samples diluted as
described in Section 7.3.2 of Method 101A.
Note: The maximum allowable blank subtraction for the HC1 is the lesser of the two
following values: (1) the actual blank measured value (Analysis Sample No. A.I blank;;
or (2) 5% of the Hg content in the filtrate (Analysis Sample No. A.I).
O
-------
Section No. 3.19.6
Date September 3, 1992
Page 9
Equation 6-11
where:
mHg = Total blank corrected Hg content in each sample, fig.
m(HciiH3 ~ Total blank corrected \ig of Hg in HC1 rinse and HC1 digestate of
filter sample.
mmtriHs = Total blank corrected Hg of Hg in KMnO4 filtrate and HNO3 di-
gestion of filter sample.
6.12.3 Mercury Emission Rate-Calculate the Hg emission rate R in g/day for continuous
operations using Equation 101A-6 in Method 101A. For cyclic operations, use only the
time per day each stack is in operation. The total Hg emission rate from a source will
be the summation of results from all stacks.
where:
A.
86,400
ID'6
wist.
T.
PS
K
K
R = K
(86,4^0 x 10'6)
Equation 6-12
Total blank corrected Hg content in each sample, ug.
Average stack gas velocity, m/s (fps).
Stack cross-sectional area, m2 (ft2).
Conversion factor, s/day.
Conversion factor, g/Jig.
Dry-gas sample volume at standard conditions, corrected for
leakage (if any), m3 (ft3).
Volume of water vapor at standard conditions, m3 (ft3) .
Absolute stack-gas temperature, °K (°R).
Absolute stack-gas pressure, mm Hg (in. Hg).
0.3858 °K/mm Hg for metric units.
17.64 °R/in. Hg for English units.
-------
Section No. 3.19 .6
Date September 3, 1952
Page 10
6.13
Determining Compliance
o
Each performance test consists of three repetitions of the applicable test
method. For the purpose of determining compliance with an applicable national emission
standard, use the average of the results of all repetitions.
6.14
Hq Calculation for Alternate Analytical Systems
For alternate analytical systems, in which Hg is measured as a concentration
(mg Hg/L of sample) the Hg in mg (m^) in the original solution is calculated as
follows:
where:
CH
DF
V,
= CHg x (DF) x (Vf)
Equation 6-12
= Measured concentration of Hg in mg Hg/L of digested sample.
= Dilution factor for the Hg-containing solution used to ensure measured
sample values were, within the-c~def ined portion of the calibration
curve. i
= Solution volume of sample prepared in L.
O
TABLE 6.1 ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR CALCULATION CHECKS
Apparatus
|Acceptance
|limits
I
|Frequency and method
|of measurement
|Action if
requirements
are not met
Analysis
data form
|All data and
|calculations are
I shown
(Visually check
I
I
Complete the
missing data
Calculations
(Difference
|between check and
(original
|calculations
|should not exceed
(round-off error
(Repeat all
(calculations
(starting with raw
|data for hand
|calculations; check
|all raw data input
|for computer
(calculations; hand
(calculate one sample
(per test
Indicate errors
on calculation
form
O
-------
Section No. 3.19.7
Date September 3, 1992
Page 1
7.0 MAINTENANCE
The normal use of emission testing equipment subjects it to corrosive gases,
extremes in temperature, vibration, and shock. Keeping the equipment in good operating
order requires knowledge of the equipment and a program of routine maintenance
performed quarterly or after 1000 ft3 of operation, whichever is greater. In addition
to the quarterly maintenance, cleaning pumps and metering systems annually is
recommended. Maintenance procedures for the various components are summarized in Table
7.1 at the end of this section. The following procedures are not required, but they
are recommended to increase the reliability of the equipment.
7.1 Sampling Equipment
7.1.1 Pump-Several types of pumps may be used to perform Method 101A; the two most
common are the fiber vane pump with in-line oiler and the diaphragm pump. The fiber
vane pump requires a periodic check of the oiler jar. Its contents should be translu-
cent; the oil should be changed if not translucent. Use the oil specified by the
manufacturer. If none is specified, use SAE-10 nondetergent oil. Whenever a fiber
vane pump starts to run erratically, or during the yearly disassembly, the head should
be removed and the fiber vanes changed.
The diaphragm pump requires little maintenance. If the diaphragm pump leaks
or runs erratically, it is normally due to a bad diaphragm or malfunctions in the
{waives; these parts are easily replaced and should be cleaned annually by complete
disassembly of the train.
7.1.2 Dry-Gas Meters—The dry-gas meter should be checked for excess oil and
component corrosion by removing the top plate every 3 months. The meter should be
disassembled, and all components should be cleaned and checked more often if the dials
show erratic rotation or if the meter will not calibrate properly.
7.1.3 Inclined Manometer-The fluid should be changed when it is discolored or
contains visible matter and when it is disassembled yearly. No other routine
maintenance is required because the inclined manometer is evaluated during the leak
checks of both the pitot tube and the entire meter box.
7.1.4 Sampling Train-All remaining sample train components should be visually
checked every 3 months, and they should be completely disassembled and cleaned or
replaced yearly. Many of the items, such as quick disconnects, should be replaced only
when damaged.
7.2 Analytical Instruments
7.2.1 Spectrophoto/neter-Consult the manufacturer's operation manual for specific
maintenance activities.
7.2.2 Peristaltic Pump TuJbing-Inspect pump tubing daily. The tubing should not have
flat spots where it has contacted the pump rollers and should feel flexible. Replace
ubing if this is not the case. ^ ^
7.2.3 Desiccant-If a moisture trap is used instead of a heated optical cell, the
desiccant should be replaced daily. Both tube ends should be filled with glass wool;
the dessicant roust not be packed too tightly.
-------
Section No. 3.19.7
Date September 3, 1992
Page 2
7.2.4 Optical Cell—The windows of the optical cell should be inspected daily for an;
dust, dirt, or grease that will degrade light throughput and overall analytical
performance. Wash gently with detergent and rinse well. Dry by blotting with a towel
and wipe, if necessary, with lens paper only.
7.2.5 Spectre-photometer Windows—The windows of the spectrophotometer must also be
inspected (at least weekly) and cleaned as described in section above.
7.2.6 Tygon Connecting Tubing-Connection tubing must be inspected on a daily basis
(or more frequently) for condensation or dirt. Replace if
necessary. The existence of moisture after the dessicant trap (if used)
indicates that the dessicant needs replacing. Refer to Section 7.2.3.
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.19.7
Date September 3, 1992
Page 3
TABLE 7.1 ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CHECKS
-------
Section No. 3.19.7
Date September 3, 1992
Page 4
o
TABLE 7.1 Checks (Continued)
Apparatus
Analytical
Instruments
Spectro-
photometer
Peristaltic
pump tubing
Desiccant
Optical
cell
Spectro-
photometer
windows
Tygon
connecting
tubing
Acceptance
limits
1
See owner' s
manual
'
Flexible; no
flat spots
Fresh or dry
used silica gel;
no moisture
Clean of dust,
dirt, grease,
etc.
Same as above
No condensation
or dirt
Frequency and method
of measurement
. J .•;:••'
See owner's manual ,
manual
Visually inspect
tubing daily
Inspect daily
Inspect,-daily
:
Inspect weekly
Inspect daily
Action if
requirements
are not met
See owners
Replace
Replace
Clean gently
with detergent;
rinse; blot with
towel
Same as above
Replace
O
-------
Section No. 3.19.8
Date September 3, 1992
Page 1
8.0 AUDITING PROCEDURES
An audit is an independent assessment of data quality. Independence is
achieved when the persons performing the audit apply standards and equipment different
from the standards and equipment of the regular field team. Routine QA checks by a
field team are necessary to generate quality data, but they are not part of the
auditing procedure. Table 8.1 at the end of this section summarizes the QA functions
for auditing.
One performance audit is recommended when testing for compliance with National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs), with New Source Performance
Standards (NSPS), and as required by other government agencies. A performance audit
is recommended when testing for other purposes; and two other performance audits are
recommended. The three performance audits are:
1. An audit of the analysis of Method 101A is recommended for NESHAPs. The
use of an NIST-traceable control sample is recommended for NSPS testing
and for other purposes.
2. An audit of the sampling is suggested by Method 101A and is recommended
by the QA Handbook.
3. An audit of the data processing i,« also recommended.
It is suggested that & systems audit be conducted as specified by the QA
coordinator in addition to these performance audits. The two performance audits and
the systems audit are described in detail in Subsections 8.1 and 8.2, respectively.
8.1 Performance Audits
Performance audits are conducted to evaluate quantitatively the quality of
data produced by the sampling, analysis, or the total measurement system (sample
collection, sample recovery, sample analysis, and data processing).
8.1.1 Performance Audit of Method 101A Analysis—A performance audit for Method 101A
analysis is recommended for NESHAPs and NSPS testing using a control sample that is
NIST-traceable. Although the control sample values are known to the analyst, the
successful analysis of a control sample, as described in Subsection 5.3.3, makes the
results traceable to an NIST standard.
8.1.2 Performance Audit of the Field Test—The dry-gas meter calibration should be
checked by one of the two techniques shown below (meter orifice check or critical
orifice check).
Meter Orifice Check—Using the data obtained during the calibration procedure
described in Section 5.3, determine the AH, for the metering system orifice. The AH,
is the orifice pressure differential in units of in. H20 that correlates to 0.75 cfm
of air at 528 °R and 29.92 in. Hg. The AHg is calculated as follows:
= " §__ Equation 8-1
AH = Average pressure differential across the orifice meter, in. H20
-------
Section No. 3.19.8
Date September 3, 1992
Page 2
Tm = Absolute average DGM temperature, °R.
Pt»r = Barometric pressure, in. Hg.
6 = Total sampling time, min.
Y = DGM calibration factor, dimensionless.
VK = Volume of gas sample as measured by DGM, dcf.
Before beginning the field test (a set of three runs usually constitutes a
field test), operate the metering system (i.e., pump, volume meter, and orifice) at the
AH, pressure differential for 10 min. Record the volume collected, the DGM tempera-
ture, and the barometric pressure. Calculate a DGM calibration check value, Yc, as
follows:
o
TTJT19 Tm
• bar
Equation 8-2
where:
Yc = DGM calibration check value, dimensionless.
10 = Run time, min.
0.0319 = (0.0567 in Hg/°R)(0.75 cfm)2.
Compare the Yc value with the dry-gas meter calibration factor, Y, tc
determine that: 0.97Y
-------
Vcrlatd) = K'
Y = V
Section No. 3.19 .8
Date September 3, 1992
Page 3
Equation 8-4
Equation 8-5
where:
vcristdi = Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice,-—correct-v
ed to standard conditions,*dscm (dscf).
K' = 0.3858 °K/mm Hg for metric units ... • •
= 17.64 °R/in Hg for English units.
7. Average the DGM calibration values for each of the flow rates. The
calibration factor, Y, at each of the flow rates should not differ by
more than ± 2% from the average. . ...
8.1.3 Performance Audit of Data Processings-Calculation errors are prevalent when
processing data. Data processing errors can be determined by auditing the recorded
data on the field and laboratory forms. The original and audit (check) calculations
should agree within round-off error; if not, all, of the remaining data should be
checked. Data processing also may be audited by requiring that the testing laboratory
rovide an example calculation for one sample,run. This example calculation will
nclude all the calculations used to determine the emissions based on the raw field and
laboratory data. . :
8.2
System Audit
A system audit is an on-site, qualitative inspection and review of the total
measurement system. Initially, a system audit is recommended for each enforcement
source test, defined here as a series of three runs at a source.
The auditor should have extensive background experience with source sampling
or source test observation, specifically with Method 101A or Method 5. The. auditor-'•&•
functions are summarized below:
1. Observe procedures and techniques of the field team during sample
collection and sample recovery.
2. Check/verify records of apparatus calibration checks and QC used in the
laboratory analysis. . . ...
While on-site, the auditor observes the source test team's overall
performance, including the following specific operations:
1. Setting up the sampling system and checking the sample train and pitot
tube for leaks.
2. Collecting the isokinetic sampling.
3. Conducting the final leak checks.
4. Sample documentation procedures, sample recovery, and preparatipn of the
samples for shipment.
Figure 4.3 in Section 3.19.4 is a suggested field observation checklist for 101A
sampling and sample recovery, and Figure 5.9 in Section 3.19.5 is a suggested checklist
or 101A sample analysis. "• -
-------
Section No. 3.19.8
Date September 3, i992
Page 4
TABLE 8.1 ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR AUDITING PROCEDURES
o
Apparatus
I
|Acceptance
|limits
I
(Frequency and method
|of measurement
I Action if
(requirements
|are not met
Performance
audit of
analytical
phase
(Measured
(relative error of
(audit samples
(less than 15%
| (or other stated
(value) for both
|samples
1
I Frequency; Once
|during every
|enforcement source
(test" '"
(Method; Measure
|audit samples and
|compare results to
|true values
|Review
(operating
|technique and
|repeat audit
Volumetric
sampling
(Measured pretest
(volume within
|± 10% of the
(audit volume
I
I Frequency; Once
|during every
|enforcement source
(test'
(Method; -^Tleasure
|reference volume and
|compare with true
|volume
I
|Review
(operating
|techniques
O
Data
processing
errors
(Original and
|checked
|calculations
(agree within
(round-off error
I
(Frequency; Once
|during every
(enforcement test"
(Method; Independent
|calculations
|starting with
|recorded data
|Check and
|correct 'all data
|for the audit
(period
|represented
(by the
|sampled data
I ______
Systems
audit-
observance
of
technique
(Operational
|technique as
(described in
(this section of
(the Handbook
I
I Frequency; Once
|during every
|enforcement source
(source test" until
|experience gained,
|then every third
(test
(Method; Observation
(of techniques
(assisted by audit
(checklist (Fig. 4.2)
(Explain to team
(their deviations
(from recommended
|techniques and
(note on Fig. 4.2
I
•As defined here, a source test, for enforcement comprises a series of three runs at one source. Source test
for purposes other than enforcement may be audited at the frequency determined by the applicabl-s group.
O
-------
Section No. 3.19.9
Date September 3, 1992
Page 1
RECOMMENDED STANDARDS FOR ESTABLISHING TRACEABILITY
To achieve data of desired quality, two essential considerations are
necessary: (1) the measurement process must be in a state of statistical control at the
time of the measurement; and (2) the systematic errors, when combined with the random
variation (errors or measurement), must result in an acceptable uncertainty. Evidence
of quality data results from performing QC checks and independent audits of the
measurement process, documenting these data, and using materials, instruments, and
measurement procedures that can be traced to an appropriate standard of reference.
Data must be routinely obtained by repeatedly measuring standard reference
samples (primary, secondary, and/or working standards) and by establishing a condition
of process control. The working calibration standards must be traceable to standards
of higher accuracy by using a control sample or by purchasing working calibration
standards that are NIST-traceable.
Performance audit samples are not required for determining compliance;
however, an NIST control sample is recommended (as discussed in Section 3.19.8) . A
control sample is also recommended as an independent check on the measurement process
when the method is performed for other purposes. This procedure makes all the
compliance determination samples traceable to an NIST standard.
/I1-
li!
-------
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.19.10
Date September 21, 1992
Page 1
10.0 REFERENCE METHODS: METHOD 101A-DETERMINATION OF PARTICIPATE AND GASEOUS
MERCURY EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
This method is similar to Method 101, except acidic potassium permanganate
solution is used instead of acidic iodine monochloride for sample collection.
1.0 APPLICABILITY AND PRINCIPLE
1 -1 Applicability
This method applies to determining particulate and gaseous Hg emissions from
sewage sludge incinerators and other sources, as specified in the regulations.
1-2 Principle
Particulate and gaseous Hg emissions are withdrawn isokinetically from the
source and collected in acidic potassium permanganate (KMnO<) solution. The Hg
collected (in mercuric form) is reduced to elemental Hg, which is then aerated from the
solution into an optical cell and measured by afc"3mic absorption spectrophotometry.
2.0 RANGE AND SENSITIVITY
2.1 Range
After initial dilution, the range of this method is 20 to 800 ng Hg/mL. The
upper limit can be extended by further dilution of the sample.
2.2 Sensitivity
The sensitivity of the method depends on the recorder/spectrophotometer
combination selected.
3.0 INTERFERING AGENTS
3.1 Sampling
Excessive oxidizable matter in the stack-gas prematurely depletes the KMnO<
solution and, thereby, prevents further collection of Hg. •
This section represents Method 101A and referenced procedures from Method 101. Text
from Method 101 is shown in bold italics.
-------
Section No. 3.19.10
Date September 21, 1992
Page 2
3.2 Analysis
o
Condensation of water vapor on the optical cell windows causes positive
interference.
4.0 PRECISION
Based on eight paired-train tests, the within-laboratory standard deviation
was estimated to be 4.8 jag/mL in the concentration range of 50 to 130 Jlg/m1.
5.0 APPARATUS
5.1 Sampling Train and Sample__Recovery
Same as in Method 101, Sections 5.1 and 5.2, respectively, except for the
following variations:
5.1.1 Probe Nozzle, Pitot Tube, Differential Pressure Gauge, Metering System,
Barometer, and Gas Density Determination Equipment—Same as in Method 5, Sections 2.1.1,
2.1.3, 2.1.4, 2.1.8, 2.1.9, and 2.1.10, respectively.
5.1.1 Probe Liner—Borosilicato or quartz glass tubing. Tenters may ueo a hooting
ay-atom capable of maintaining a gas tojuperaturo of 120 ± 14 °C (248 ± 25 °F) at the
probe exit during campling to prevent orator condemnation. (Notes Do not ueo metal
probo liners.)
If a filter is used ahead of the impingers, testers must use the prob
heating system to minimize the condensation of gaseous Hg. If a filter is used ahead
of the impingers, testers must use the probe heating system to minimize the
condensation of gaseous Hg.
O
5.1.2 Filter Holder (Optional)—The holder should be composed of borosilicate glass
with a rigid stainless-steel wire-screen filter support (do not use glass frit
supports) and a silicone rubber or Teflon gasket, designed to provide a positive seal
against leakage from outside or around the filter. The filter holder must be equipped
with a filter heating system capable of maintaining a temperature around the filter
holder of 120 ± 15 °C (248 ± 25 °F) during sampling to minimize both water and gaseous
Hg condensation. Testers may use a filter in cases where the stream contains large
quantities of particulate matter.
5.1.3 Impingers-Four Groonburg-Sndtb impingers are required. They should be
connected in series with leak-free ground glass fittings or any similar leak-free,
noncontominating fittings. For the firat, third, and fourth impingersf tenters may use
impingors that are modified by replacing the tip with a 13-nxn ID (0.5-in.) glass tube
extending to 13 mm (0.5 in.) from the bottom of the flask.
O
/;
-------
Section No. 3.19.10
Date September 21, 19&2
Page 3
5.2 Sample Recovery . • ... ... .
The following items are needed for sample recovery:
5.2.1 Glass Sample Bottles-The bottles should be leakless, with Teflon-lined cape,
1000 and 100 ml/.
5.2.2 Graduated Cylinder—A 250-mL graduated cylinder is required.
5.2.3 Funnel and .Rubber Policeman—These items aid in transferring silica gel to the
container; they are not necessary if the silica gel 10 weighed in the field.
5.2.4 Funnel-The funnel should be glass/ it aids in sample recovery.
5.2 Analysis
Same as in Method 101, Sections 5.3 and 5.4, respectively, except as follows:
5.2.1 Volumetric Pipets-Pipets must be Class A, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, and 20 mL.
5.2.2 Graduated Cylinder—A 25-mL graduated cylinder is required.
.2.3 Steam Bath-Same as Method 101.
5.3 Sample Preparation and Analysis
The following equipment is needed for sample preparation and analysis:
5.3.1 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer—Any atomic absorption unit is suitable,
provided it has an open sample presentation area in which to mount the optical cell.
Testers should follow the instrument settings recommended by the manufacturer. Instru-
ments designed specifically for measuring Hg using the cold-vapor technique are commer-
cially available and may be substituted for the atomic absorption Spectrophotometer.
5.3.2 Optical Cell—The optical cell should be cylindrical, with quartz end wlndovs
and the dimensions shown in Figure 101A-2. Wind the cell with approximately 2 m of
24-gauge nichrome heating wire and wrap with fiberglass insulation tape, or equivalent;
do not let the wires touch one another. As an alternative to the heating wire, tester-
may use a heat lamp mounted above the cell or a moisture trap installed upstream of ths
cell.
5.3.3 Aeration Cell-Tie coll must be constructed according to the specifications
in Figure 101A-3. Do not use a glass frit as a substitute for the blown glass bubbler
tip shown in Figure 101A-3. Aeration cells, available with commercial ccld-vapcr
instrumentation, may be used as an alternate apparatus.
5.3.41 Recorder—The recorder must be matched to output of the Spectrophotometer
escribed in Section 5.3.1.
V
5.5.5 Variable Transformer-The transformer is necessary for varying the voltage en
the optical cell from 0 to 40 volts.
5.3.6 Hood-A hood is required for venting the optical cell exhaust.
-------
Section No. 3.19.10
Date September 21, 1992
Page 4
5.3.7 Flow Metering Valve-Same as Method 101.
o
5.3.8 Flow Meter—A rotometor, or equivalent, la required that IB capable of
measuring a gao flow of 1.5 L/mln.
5.3.9 Aeration Gas Cylinder—The cylinder must contain nitrogen or dry, Hg-free air
and must be equipped with a single-stage regulator. As an alternative, aeration may
be provided by a peristaltic metering pump. If a commercial cold-vapor instrument is
used, follow the manufacturer's recommendations. .
5.3.10 Tubing-Tho tubing ia require for making connections. Deo glass tubing
(ungreaaed ba.ll* and socket-connections arc recommended) for all connections between
the solution cell and the optical cell; do not UBO Tygon tubing, other types of
flexible tubing, or metal tubing as eubntltuten. Teeters may use Teflon, stool, or
copper tubing between the nitrogen tank and the flow meter valve (Section 5.3.7), and
Tygon, gum, or rubber tubing between the flow meter valve and the aeration cell.
5.3.11 Flow Rate Calibration Equipment—This equipment consists of a bubble flow
meter or a wet-test meter for measuring a gas flow rate of 1.5 ± 0.1 L/mln.
5.3.12 Volumetric Flasks—Those flasks must be Class A, with ponnyhoad standard taper
stoppers; the required sizes are 100, 250, 500, and 1000 mL.
5.3.13 Volumetric Pipets-Thoso plpots must bo Class A; the required sizes are 1, 2,
3, 4, 5, 10, and 20 mL.
5.3.14 Graduated Cylinder—A 25-mL cylinder is required.
5.3.15 Magnetic Stirrer—A general-purpose laboratory-type stirring bar is required.
5.3.16 Magnetic Stirring Bar—A Teflon-coated stirring bar is required.
5.3.17 Balance-A balance capable of weighing to ± 0.5 g is required.
5.3.18 Steam Bath
O
o
-------
Section No. 3.19.10
Date September 21, 1992
Page 5
5.4 Alternative Analytical Apparatus
Alternative systems are allowable as long as they meet the following
criteria:
5.4.1 The system must generate a linear calibration curve and two consecutive
samples of the same aliquot size and concentration must agree within 3% of their
average.
5.4.2 The system must allow for recovery of a minimum of 95% of the spike when an
aliquot of a source sample is spiked with a known concentration of Hg (II) compound.
5.4.3 The reducing agent should be added after the aeration cell is closed.
5.4.4 The aeration bottle bubbler should not contain a frit.
5.4.5 Any Tygon tubing used should be as short as possible and should be
conditioned prior to use until blanks and standards yield linear and reproducible
results.
5.4.6 If manual stirring is performed before aeration, the aeration cell should be
closed during the process.
5.4.7 A drying tube should not be used unless it is conditioned following the
procedure for the Tygon tubing, above.
6.0 REAGENTS
Use ACS reagent-grade chemicals or equivalent, unless otherwise specified.
6 .1 Sampling and Recovery
The following reagents are used in sampling and recovery:
6.1.1 WaCer-Deionized distilled, meeting ASTM specifications for Type I Reagent
Water—ASTM Test Method D'1193-77. If high concentrations of organic matter are not
expected to be present, users may eliminate the KMnO4 test for oxidizable organic
matter. Use this water in all dilutions and solution preparations.
6.1.2 Nitric Acid (HNO,), 50% (v/v)-Hix equal volumes of concentrated HN03 and
water, being careful to add the acid to the water slowly.
6.1.3 Silica Gel-Indicating type, 6- to 16-mesh. If previously used, dry at 175
°C (350 °F) for 2 h. Testers may use new silica gel as received.
6.1.4 Filter (Optional;-Glass fiber filter, without organic binder, exhibiting at
least 99.95% efficiency on 0.3-nm dioctyl phthalate smoke particles. Testers may use
the filter in cases where the gas stream contains large quantities of particulate
matter, but they should analyze blank filters for Hg content. <,
6.1.5 Sulfuric Acid (H:SO.), 10% (v/v)-Add and mix 100 mL of concentrated H;SO. to
900 mL of water.
-------
Section No. 3.19.10
Date September 21, 1992
Page 6
6.1.6 Absorbing Solution, 4% KMnO, (WvJ-Prepare fresh daily. Dissolve
KMnO< in sufficient 10% H;SO, to make 1 L. Prepare and store in glass bottles to
prevent degradation. :
6.1.7 Hydrochloric Acid—Trace metals grade HCl is recommended. If other grades are
used, the Hg level must be less than 3 ng/mL Hg.
6.1.8 Hydrochloric Acid, 8 ^-Dilute 67 mL of concentrated HCl to 100 mL with water
(slowly add the HCl to the water).
6.2 Analysis
The reagents needed for analysis are listed below:
6.2.1 Tin (II) Solution-Prepare fresh daily and keep sealed when not being used.
Completely dissolve 20 g of tin (II) chloride [or 25 g of tin (II) sulfate] crystals
(Baker Analyzed reagent grade or any other brand that will give a clear solution) in
25 mL of concentrated HCl. Dilute to 250 mL with water. Do not substitute HNO3, H;SO,.,
or other strong acids for the HCl. . .
6.2.2 Sodium Chloride-Hydroxylamine Solution—Dissolve 12 g of sodium chloride and
12 g of hydroxylamine sulfate (or 12 g of hydroxylamine hydrochloride) in water and
dilute to 100 mL.
6.2.3 Hydrochloric Acid, 8 J\HDilute 67 mL of concentrated HCl to 100 mL with
(slowly add the HCl to the water).
6.2.4 Nitric Acid, 15% (v/v)-Slouly add 15 mL of concentrated HN03 to 100 mL of
water.
6.2.5 Mercury StocJc Solution, 1 mg Hg/mL-Prepare and store all Hg standard
solutions in borosilicate glass containers. Completely dissolve 0.1354 g of Hg (II)
chloride in 75 mL of water. Add 10 mL of concentrated HNO3 and adjust the volume to
exactly 100 mL with water. Mix thoroughly. This solution is stable for at least 1
month.
6.2.6 Intermediate Hg Standard Solution, 10 jig/mL-Prepare fresh weekly. Pipet 5.0
mL of the Hg stock solution (Section 6.2.5) into a 500-mL volumetric flask, and add 20
mL of 15% HNOj solution. Adjust the volume to exactly 500 mL with water. Thoroughly
mix the solution.
6.2.7 Working Hg Standard Solution, 200 ng Hg/mL-Prepare fresh daily. Pipet 5.0
mL from the Intermediate Hg Standard Solution (Section 6.2.6) into a 250-mL volumetric
flask. Add 5 mL of 4% KMnO, absorbing solution and 5 mL of 15% HNO,. Adjust che volume
to exactly 250 mL with water. Mix thoroughly.
6.2.8 Potassium Permanganate, 5% fw/vJ-Dissolve 5 g of KMnO< in water and dilute
to 100 mL.
6.2.9 Filter—Use a Whatman 40, or equivalent.
7 .0 PROCEDURE
o
-------
Section No. 3.19.10
Date September 21, 1992
Page 7
7.1.
Sampling
The sampling procedure is the same as in Method 101, except for changes
associated with using KMnO4 instead of IC1 absorbing solution and the possible use of
a filter. Because of the complexity of this method, teeters should be trained and
experienced with all procedures to ensure reliable results. Because the amount of Kg
collected generally is small, the method must be applied carefully to prevent sample
contamination or loss.
7.1.1 Pretest Preparation—Follow the general procedure given in Method 5, Section
4.1.1, but omit the directions on the filter.
7.1.2 Preliminary Determinations—The preliminary determinations are the same as
those given in Method 101, Section 7.1.2, except for the absorbing solution depletion
sign. In this method, high-oxidizable organic matter content may make it impossible
to sample for the desired minimum time. This problem is indicated by the complete
bleaching of the purple color of the KMnO< solution. In these cases, testers may
divide the sample run into two or more subruns to ensure that the absorbing solution
will not be depleted. In cases where excess water condensation is encountered, collect
two runs to make one sample. H~
7.1.2
Sampling Train Preparation
7.1.2.1 Sampling train preparation is the same as that given in Method 101, Section
7.1.3, except for the cleaning of the glassware (probe, filter holder, if used,
impingers, and connectors) and for the charging of the first three impingers. In this
method, clean all the glass components by rinsing with 50% HN03/ tap water, 8 N HCl,
tap water, and finally deionized distilled water. Then place 50 mL of 4% KMnO< in the
first impinger and 100 mL in each of the second and third impingers.
7.1.2.2 If a filter is used, place it with the filter holder with a pair of tweezers.
Be sure to center the filter, and place the gasket in the proper position to prevent
the sample gas stream from by-passing the filter. Visually check the filter for damage
after assembly is completed. Be sure to set the filter heating system at the desired
operating temperature after the sampling train has been assembled.
7.1.2.1 Follow the general procedure given in Method 5, Section 4.1.2, except as
follows: Select a nozzle size based on the range of velocity heads to ensure that it
is not necessary to change the nozzle size to maintain isokinetic sampling rates below
28 L/min (1.0 cfm).
7.1.2.2 Highly oxidizable organic content may make it impossible to sample for the
desired minimum time. This problem is indicated by the complete bleaching of the
purple color of the KMnO4 solution. If the purple color is expended in the last
(third) KMnOt impinger, the sample run is unacceptable and another run shall be
conducted. In these cases, testers may divide the sample run into two or more subruns
to ensure that the absorbing solution will not be depleted or a fourth impinger
containing 100 mL of KMnOt may be used. In cases where excess water condensation is
encountered, collect two runs to make one sample or add extra empty impinger before the
first impinger containing KMnO4 solution.
7.1.3 All the glass components should been cleaned in the laboratory (a hood is
recommended) by soaking with 50% HNO, for 1 h and then by rinsing with tap water, B N
-------
Section No. 3.19.10
Date September 21, 1952
Page 8 ......
• •<-.•••:•' •. .. • •-.(-. • . .-:••••.
HC1, tap water, and finally deionizod distilled water. After cleaning, openings shou
bo covered to prevent contamination.
7.1.3.1 Place 50 mL of 4% KMnO< in the first impinger and 100 tnL in each of the
second and third impingers. Take care to prevent the absorbing solution frc.-n
contacting any greased surfaces. Place approximately 200 g of preweighed silica gel
in the fourth impinger. Testers may use more silica gel, but they should be careful
to ensure that it is not entrained and carried out from the impinger during sampling.
Place the silica gel container in a clean place, for later use in the sample recovery.
Alternatively, determine and record the weight of. the silica gel plus impinger to the
nearest 0.5 g. (Note: Contact with KMnO4 should be avoided.)
7.1.3.2 If a filter is used, place it in the filter holder with a pair of tweezers.
Be sure to center the filter, and place the gasket in the proper position to prevent
the sample gas stream from by-passing the filter. Check the filter for tears after
assembly is completed. Be sure to set the filter heating system at the desired
operating temperature after the sampling train has been assembled.
7.1.3.3 Install tho selected nozzle using a Viton A O-ring when Btack temperatures
are less than 260 °C (500 °F). UBO a fiborgldss string gasket if temperatures are
higher. Other connecting systems uaing either 316\stainloss-stool or Teflon ferrules
may bo used. Mark the probe with heat-resistant tape or by some other method to denote
tho proper distance into the stack or duct for each sampling point. Assemble the train
an shown in Figure 101A-1,'using (if necessary) a very light coat of silicone gre&s~*<.
on all ground glass Joints. Grease only the outer portion to avoid contamination^ 1
tho oiliconc grease. ^—^
Note: An empty impinger may be inserted between the.filter and firsc impinc--£r
containing KMnO< to remove excess moisture from the sample stream.
7.1.3.4 After tho sampling train has been assembled, turn on and set the probe, if
applicable, at tho desired operating temperature. Allow time for the temperatures to
stabilize. Place crushed ice around tho iopingors.
7.1.4 Leak Check Procedures-Follow the leak chock procedures outlined in Hethod 5,
Sections A.I.A.I, 4.1.4.2, and 4.1.4.3.
7.1.3 Sampling Train Operation—In addition to the procedure given in Method.3.01,
Section 7.1.5, maintain a temperature around tho filter (if applicable) of-,120 * 14 °C
(248 ± 25 °F).
7.1.5 Mercury Train Operation-Follow the general procedure given in Method 5,
Section 4.1.5, maintain a temperature around the filter (if applicable) of 120 * 14 .°C
(248 ± 25 °F) . For each run, record tho data required on a data sheet, such as the one
shown in Figure 101A-4.
7.1.6 Calculating Percent of Isokinetic Sampling—Same as in' Method 5, Section
4.1.6.
1.2 Sample Recovery
;D
Begin proper cleanup procedure as soon as the probe is removed from the s
at the end of the sampling period. Allow the probe to cool. When it can be handled
safely, wipe off any external particulate matter near the nozzle tip and place a cap
-------
Section No. 3.19.10
Date September 21, 1951
Page 9
over it. Do not cap the probe tip tightly while the sampling train is cooling because
the resultant vacuum would draw liquid from the impingers. Before moving the sample
train to the cleanup site, remove the probe from the train, wipe off the silicons
grease, and cap the open outlet of the probe. Be careful not to lose any condensate
that might be present. Wipe the silicone grease from the impinger. Use either
ground-glass stoppers, plastic caps, or serum caps to close these openings. Transfer
the probe, impinger assembly, and (if applicable) filter assembly to an area that is
clean, protected from the wind, and free of Hg contamination.
The ambient air in laboratories located in the immediate vicinity of Hg-using
facilities is not normally free of Hg contamination. Inspect the train before and
during assembly and note any abnormal conditions. Treat the sample as follows:
7.2.1 Container Wo. 1 (Impinger, Probe, and Filter Holder) and, if Applicable, No.
1A (HC1 Rinse)
7.2.1.1 Using a graduated cylinder, measure the liquid in the first three impingers
to within 1 mL. Record the volume of liquid present (see Figure 5-3 of Method 5 in 41
CFR Part 60). This information is needed to calculate the moisture content of the
effluent gas. (Use only graduated cylinder and glass storage bottles that have beer.
precleaned as described in Section 7.1.2) Pla"ce the contents of the first three
impingers into a 1000-mL glass sample bottle. Note: If a filter is used, remove the
filter from its holder, as outlined under Container No. 3 below.
7.2.1.2 Taking care that dust on the outside of the probe or other exterior surfaces
does not get into the sample, quantitatively recover the Hg (and any condensate) fron
the probe nozzle, probe fitting, probe liner, and front half of the filter holder (if
applicable) and impingers as follows: Rinse these components with a total of 400 r.L-
of fresh 4% KMnO^ solution, carefully ensuring removal of all loose particulate matter
from the impingers. Add all washings to the 1000-mL glass sample bottle. Remove ar.y
residual brown deposits on the glassware following the permanganate rinse with
approximately 100 mL of water, carefully assuring removal of all loose particulate
matter from the impingers, and add this rinse to Container No. 1. If no visible
deposits remain after this water rinse, do not rinse with 8 N HC1. However, if
deposits do remain on the glassware after the water rinse, wash impinger walls ar.d
stems with the same 25 mL of 8 N HC1 and place the wash in a separate container labeled
Container No. 1A. Use the following procedure: Place 200 mL of water in a sample
container labeled Container No. 1A. Use only a total of 25 mL of 8 N HCl to rinse ell
impingers. Wash the impinger walls and stem with the HCl by turning and shaking the
impinger so that the HCl contacts all inside surfaces. While stirring, pour the KC1
wash carefully into Container No. 1A. The separate container is used for safety
reasons.
7.2.1.3 After all washings have been collected in the sample container, tighten the
lid to prevent leakage during shipment to the laboratory. Mark the height of the fluid
level to help determine whether leakage occurs during transport. Label the container
to identify its contents clearly.
7.2.2 Container Wo. 2 (Silica GeJ^-Note the color of the indicating silica gel tc
determine whether it has been completely spent and make a notation of its ccnditifen..
Transfer the silica gel from its impinger to its original container and seal the
container. A funnel may be used to pour the silica gel, and a rubber policeman may be
used to remove the silica gel from the impinger. It is not necessary to remove the
small amount of particles that may adhere to the impinger wall and are difficult t:
-------
Section No. 3.19.10
. • Date September' '21, 1992
. . . Page 10 -
remove. Because the weight gain is to be used for moisture calculations, do not use
any water or other liquids to transfer the silica gel. If a balance is available in
the field, weigh the spent silica gel (or silica gel plus impinger) to the nearest 0.5
g and record this weight. .
7.2.3 Container No. 3 (Filter)—If a filter was used, carefully remove it from the
filter holder, place it in a 100-mL glass sample bottle, and add 20 to 40 mL of 4%
KMnO<. If it is necessary to fold the filter, be sure that the particulate cake is
inside the fold. Carefully transfer to the 150-mL sample bottle any particulate matter
and filter fibers that adhere to the filter holder gasket by using a dry Nylon bristle
brush and a sharp-edged blade. Seal the container. Label the container to identify
its contents clearly. Mark the height of the fluid level to help determine whether
leakage occurs during transport.
7.2.4 Container No. 4 (Filter Blank)—It a filter was used, treat an unused filter
from the same filter lot used for sampling in the same manner as Container No. 3.
7.2.5 Container No. 5 (Absorbing Solution Blank)—For a blank, place 650 mL of 4 %
KMnO., absorbing solution in a 1000-mL sample bottle. Seal the container.
.-r~
7.2.6 Container No. 6 (HCl Rinse Blank)—For a blank, place 200 mL of water in a
1000-mL sample bottle. While stirring, add 25 mL of 8 N HCl. Seal the container.
Only one blank sample per 3 runs is required.
7 .3 Sample Preparation
Check the liquid level in each container to see if liquid was lost during
transport. If a noticeable amount of leakage occurred, either void the sample or use
methods subject to the approval of the Administrator to account for the losses. Then
follow the procedures below:
7.3.1 Containers No. 3 and No. 4 (Filter and Filter Blank)-I£ a filter was used,
place the contents, including the filter, of Containers No. 3 and No. 4 in separate
250-mL beakers. Heat the beakers on a steam bath until most of the liquid has
evaporated. Do not take to dryness. Add 20 mL of concentrated HNO3 to the beakers,
cover them with a watch glass, and heat on a hot plate at 70 °C for 2 h. Remove from
the hot plate. Filter the solution from the digestion of the contents of Container No.
3 through Whatman 40 filter paper and save the filtrate for addition to the Container
No. 1 filtrate, as described below. Discard the filter. Filter the solution from the
digestion of the contents of Container No. 4 through Whatman 40 filter paper and save
the filtrate for addition to the Container No. 5 filtrate, as described in Section
7.3.2 below. Discard the filter.
7.3.2 Container No. 1 (Impingers, Probe, and Filter Holder) and, if Applicable, No.
1A (HCl Rinse)—Filter the contents of Container No. 1 through Whatman 40 filter paper
into a 1-L volumetric flask to remove the brown MnO_ precipitate. Save the filter.
'Add the sample filtrate from Container No. 3 to the 1-L volumetric flask and dilute to
volume with water. If the combined filtrates are greater than 1000 mL, determine the
volume to the nearest mL and make the appropriate corrections for blank subtractions.
Mix thoroughly.
Mark the filtrate as Analysis Sample No. A.I and analyze for Hg within 48 h
after completing the filtration step. Place the saved filter, which was used to remove
the brown MnO: precipitate, into a container of appropriate size. Add 25 mL of £ N HCl
o
o
o
-------
Section No. 3.19.10
Date September 21, 1992
Page 11
to the filter and allow the filter, with its brown residue, to digest for a minimum of
24 h at room temperature. Filter the contents of Container No. 1A through a Whatman
40 filter paper into a 500-mL volumetric flask. Then filter the digestion of the brown
MnO; precipitate from Container No. 1 and the Whatman paper filter into the 500-mL
volumetric flask. Dilute to volume with water. Mark this 500-mL dilute solution as
'Analysis Sample No. HCl A.2 and analyze for Hg. Discard the filters.
7.3.3 Containers No. 5 (Absorbing Solution Blank) and No. 6 (HCl Rinse Blank)—Treat
Container No. 5 the same as Container No. 1, described in the previous section. Add
the filter blank filtrate from Container No. 4 to the 1-L volumetric flask and dilute
to volume. Mix thoroughly. Mark this as Sample No. A.I blank and analyze for Hg
within 48 h after completing the filtration step. Digest any brown precipitate
remaining on the filter from the filtration of Container No. 5, using the procedure
described in Section 7.3.2. Filter the contents of Container No. 6 using the procedure
described in Section 7.3.2 and combine into the 500-mL volumetric flask with the
filtrate from the digested blank MNO2 precipitate. Mark this resultant 500-mL combined
dilute solution as Analysis Sample No. HCl A.2 blank. Note: When analyzing blank
samples A.I blank and HCl A.2 blank, always begin with 10-mL aliquots. This note
applies specifically to blank samples.
--*"""
7.4 Analysis .
7.4.1 Calibrate the spectrophotometer and recorder and prepare the calibration
curve as described in sections 8.1 and 8.2. Then repeat the procedure used to
establish the calibration curve with aliquots of appropriate size (1 to 10 mL) of the
samples (from sections 7.3.2 and 7.3.3) until two consecutive peak heights agree within
3% of their average value. If the 10-mL sample is below the detectable limit, use a
larger aliquot (up to 20 mL), but decrease the volume of water added to the aeration
cell accordingly to prevent the solution volume from exceeding the capacity of the
aeration bottle. If the peak maximum of a 1-mL aliquot is off scale, further dilute
the original sample to bring the Hg concentration into the calibration range of the
spectrophotometer. If the Hg content of the absorbing solution and filter blank is
below the working range of the analytical method, use zero for the blank.
7.4.2 Run a blank and standard at least after every five samples to check the
spectrophotometer calibration; recalibrate as necessary. It also is recommended that
at least one sample from each stack test be checked by the Method of Standard Additions
to confirm that matrix effects have not interfered with the analysis.
8.0 Calibration and Standards
The calibration and standards are the same as in Method 101, Section 8,
except for the following variations:
8.1 Optical Cell Heating System Calibration
Same as in Method 101, Section 8.2, but use a 25-mL graduated cylinder to add
25 mL of water to the bottle section of the aeration cell.
i,
8.2 Spectrophotometer and Recorder Calibration
8.2.1 The Hg response may be measured by either peak height or peak area. Note:
The temperature of t,he solution affects the rate at which elemental Hg is released;
-------
Section No. 3.19.10
Date September 21, 1992
Page 12
consequently, it affects the shape of the absorption curve (area) and the point of
maximum absorbance (peak height). To obtain reproducible results, all solutions must
be brought to room temperature before use.
8.2.2 Set the spectrophotometer wave length at 253.7 nm and 'make certain the
optical cell is at the minimum temperature that will prevent water condensation. Then
set the recorder scale as follows: Using a 25-mL graduated cylinder, add 25 mL of
water to the aeration cell bottle, and pipet 5 mL of the working Hg standard solution
into the aeration cell. Note: Always add the Hg-containing solution to the aeration
cell after the 25 mL of water.
8.2.3 Place a Teflon-coated stirring bar in the bottle. Add 5 mL of the 4% KMn04
to the aeration bottle and mix well. Attach the bottle section to the bubbler section
of the aeration cell. Make certain that: (1) the aeration cell exit arm stopcock
(Figure 101-3 of Method 101) is closed (so that Hg will not prematurely enter the
optical cell when the reducing agent is being added); and (2) there is no flow through
the bubbler. Add 5 mL of sodium chloride hydroxylamine in 1-mL increments until the
solution is colorless. Now add 5 mL of tin (II) solution to the aeration bottle
through the side arm and immediately stopper the side arm. Stir the solution for 15
s, turn on the recorder, open the aeration cell" exit arm stopcock, and immediately
initiate aeration with continued stirring. Determine the maximum absorbance of the
standard, and set this value to read 90% of the recorder full scale.
Before uao, clean nil glao8wa.ro, both now and unod, as follows: Brush with
soap and tap water, liberally rinse with tap water, soak for 1 h In 50% HNO3. Rinse
with dolonlzod distilled water.
6.1 Flow Calibration
Assemble the aeration system an shown in Figure 101-5. Sot the outlet
pressure on the aeration gas cylinder regulator to a minimum pressure of 500 mm Hg (10
pel), and use the flow motoring valve and a bubble flow meter or wot-tost meter to
obtain a flow rate of 1.5 ± 0.1 L/mln through the aeration cell. After the flow
calibration IB completed, remove the bubble flow noter from the system.
8.2 Optical Cell Heating System_ Calibration
Using a 25-mL Graduated cylinder/ add 25 mL of water to the bottle section
of the aeration cell and attach the bottle section to the bubbler section of the cell.
Attach the aeration coll to the optical coll; while aerating at 1.5 L/nln, determine
tho minimum variable transformer sotting necessary to prevent condensation of moisture
In the optical cell and In the connecting tubing. (This setting should not exceed 20
volts.)
8.3 Spectrophotometer and Recorder Calibration
8.3.1 The Hg response may bo measured by either peak height or peafc area. fWote:
The temperature of the solution affects the rate at which elemental Hg ID released;
conse
-------
Section No. 3.19.10
Date September 21, 1952
Page 13
Bet the recorder scale as follows.- Using a. 25-mL Graduated cylinder, add 25 mL of
water to the aeration cell bottle and pipet 5 aL of the working Hg standard solution
into the aeration cell. (Note: Always add the Hg-containing solution to the aeration
cell after the 25 mL of water.)
8.3.3 Place a Teflon-coated stirring bar in the bottle. Using a 25-mL graduated
cylinder, add 25 mL of laboratory pure water to the aeration cell bottle. Pipet 5.0
mL of the working Hg standard solution to the aeration cell. Add 5 mL of the 4% KMnO,
absorbing solution, followed by 5 mL of 15% UNO, and 5 mL of 5% KMnO< to the aeration
cell, and mix well using a swirling motion. Attach the bottle to the aerator, making
sure that: (1) the exit arm stopcock is closed, and (2) there is no aeration gas
flowing through the bubbler. Through the side arm, add 5 mL of sodium chloride
hydroxylamine solution in 1 mL-increments until the solution is colorless. Through the
side arm, add 5 mL of the Tin (II) reducing agent to the aeration cell bottle, and
immediately stopper the side arm. Stir the solution for 15 s and turn on the recorder
or integrator. Open the aeration cell exit arm stopcock and initiate the gas flow.
Determine the maximum height (absorbance) of the standard, and set this value to read
90% of the recorder full scale.
8.4 Calibration Curve -->-
8.4.1 After setting the recorder scale, repeat the procedure in Section 8.3 using
-, 1-, 2~, 3-, 4-, and 5-mL aliquots of the working standard solution (final amount
f Kg In the aeration cell Is 0, 200, 400, 600, BOO, and 1000 ng, respectively).
Repeat this procedure on each aliquot size until two consecutive peaks agree within 3%
of their average value. (Note: To prevent Hg carryover from one sample to another, do
not close the aeration cell from the optical cell until the recorder pen has returned
to the baseline.)
8.4.2 It should not be necessary to disconnect the aeration gas inlet line from the
aeration cell when changing samples. After separating the bottle and .bubbler sections
of the aeration cell, place the bubbler section into a 600-mL beaker containing
approximately 400 mL of water. Rinse the bottle section of the aeration cell with a
stream of water to remove all traces of the tin (II) reducing agent. Also, to prevent
the loss of Hg before aeration, remove all traces of the reducing agent between samples
by washing with water. It will be necessary, however, to wash the aeration cell parts
with concentrated HCl if any of the following conditions occur: (1) a white film
appears on any inside surface of the aeration cell; (2) the calibration curve changes
suddenly; or (3) the replicate samples do not yield reproducible results.
8.4.3 subtract the average peak height (or peak area) of the blank (0-aL
aliquot)-which should be less than 2% of" recorder full scale-from the averaged peak
heights of the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-mL aliquot standards. If the blank absorbance is
greater than 2% of full-scale, the probable cause is Hg contamination of a reagent or
carry-over of Hg from a previous sample. Plot the corrected peak height of each
standard solution versus the corresponding final total Hg weight in the aeration cell
(in ng), and draw the best-fit straight line. This line should either pass through the
>rigin or pass through a point no further from the origin than * 2 % of the recorder
ull scale. If the line does not pass through or very near to the origin, check for
"nonlinearity of the curve and for incorrectly prepared standards.
9.0 Calculations
-------
Section No. 3.19.10
Date September 21, 1552
Page 14
9.1 Dry-Gas Volume, Volume of Water Vapor and Moisture Content, Stack-S=!
Velocity, Isokinetic Variation and Acceptable Results, and Determination of Compliance
Same as in Method 101, Sections 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.6, and 9.7, respectively,
but use data obtained from this test.
9.1 Dry-Gas Volume
Using the data from this toot/ calculate Vflttll), the dry-gas sample volume at
standard conditions (corrected for leakage, if necessary) as outlined in Section 6.3
of Method 5. '
9.2 Volume of Water Vapor and Moisture Content
Using the data obtained from this tost, calculate the volume of water vapor
Vul,ca, and the moisture content Bw, of the stack-gas. Use equations 5-2 and 5-3 of
Method 5.
9.3 Stack-Gas Velocity
-•*"""
Using the data from this teat and Equation 2-9 of Method 2, calculate the
average stack-gas velocity v,.
9.4 Isokinetic Variation and Acceptable Kesults ' • ; "
Same as in Method 5, Sections 6.11 and 6.12, respectively.
9.5 Determining Compliance
Each performance test consiots of three repetitions of the applicable tesc
.method. For the purpose of determining compliance with an applicable national emission
standard, use the average of the results of all repetitions.
9.2 Total Mercury
For each source sample, correct the average maximum absorbance of the tvrc
consecutive samples whose peak heights agreed within 3% of their average for the
contribution of the blank. Then calculate the total Kg content in |Jg in each sample.
Correct for any dilutions made to bring the sample into the working range of th<=
spectrophotometer.
O
O
-------
Section -No; 3.15.10
Date September 21, 1952
Page 15
[C(HC1 Jb-Z *)•„;, DFt:.K]
~~~
Equation 101A-1
where:
m(HCl)H,
C(HC1),
C(HC1 blk)H,
DF
DFM,
V(IH.:
10"
S
Total blank corrected ng of Hg in HC1 rinse and HC1
digestate of filter sample. ...
Total ng of Hg analyzed ;in.^the aliquot from the BOO-iri
Analysis Sample No. HCLA.2.,
Total ng of Hg analyzed .in aliquot of the 500-rnL Anal-
ysis Sample No. HC1_A.2 blank.
Dilution factor for the HC1 digested Hg-ccntaining
solution, Analysis Sample No. HC1 A.2. This dilution
factor (DF) applies only to the intermediate dilution
steps because the original sample volume (V.),.-: of HCi
A.2 has been factored out in the equation, along with
the sample aliquot, (S) . In Equation 6.9, the sample
aliquot, S, is introduced directly into the aeration
cell for analysis according to the procedure outlined in
Section 3.19.5.3.4. A dilution factor is required only
if it is necessary to bring the sample into the analyti-
cal instrument's calibration range. If no dilution is
necessary, then DF equals 1.0.
Dilution factor for the Analysis Sample No. HCI A. 2
blank. (Note: Normal dilution factor calculations apply
here.)
Solution volume of original sample, 500 mL for samples
diluted as described in Section 7.3.1.
Conversion factor, Jlg/ng.
Aliquot volume of sample added to aeration cell, mL.
Aliquot volume of blank added to aeration cell, ~iL.
Note: The maximum allowable blank subtraction fcr the HCI is the lesser cf
the two following values: (1) the actual blank measured value (Analysis Sample I'io. HCI
.2 blank); or (2) 5% of the Hg content in the combined HCI rinse and digesced sampi*
'(Analysis Sample No. HCI A.2).
where:
-------
Section No. 3.19.10
Date September 21, 199
Page 16
o
DF
(C(fltrblk) DFblk
m(fltr).
C(fltr)
C(fltr blk).
V
f ibH.i
10~? Equation 101A-2
Jblk
= Total blank corrected Hg of Hg in KMNO4 filtrate and HNC;
digestion of filter sample.
= Total ng of Hg in aliquot of KMNO4 filtrate and HNC-.
digestion of filter analyzed (aliquot of Analysis Sample
No. A.1).
= Total ng of Hg in aliquot of KMNO< blank and HNO3 diges-
tion of blank filter analyzed (aliquot of Analysis
Sample No. A.I blank).
= Solution volume of Original sample, normally 1000 mL fcr
samples diluted as described in Section "7.3.2.
= Solution volume of blank sample, 1000 mL for samples
diluted as described in Section 7.3.2
Note: The maximum allowable blank subtraction for the HC1 is the lesser cf
the two following values: (1) the actual blank measured value (Analysis Sample No. A.I
blank); or (2) 5% of the Hg content in the filtrate (Analysis Sample No. A.I).
O
= m(HCl}H. + m(fltr)H
Equation 101A-3
where:
9.3
m(fltr)H,
= Total blank corrected Hg content in each sample, \ig.
= Total blank corrected ug of Hg in HCl rinse and HCl digestate
of filter sample.
= Total blank corrected Hg of Hg in KMNO,. filtrate ar.c HNC:.
digestion of filter sample.
Mercury Emission Rate
Calculate the Hg emission rate R in g/day for continuous operations using
Equation 101A-4. For cyclic operations, use only the time per day each stack is ir.
operation. The total Hg emission rate from a source will be the summation of results
from all stacks. <• .
v;here:
O
Total blank corrected Hg content in each sample, ug.
-------
A.
86,400
10'"
T.
Ps
K
Section No. 3.19.10
Date September 21, 1992
Page 17
R = K
Ha Vs Ar (86,400 X
V + V I ( T IP )
"mlred! VK,£iJ\ -I v •'-' cf'
Average stack-gas velocity, m/sec (fps).
Stack cross-sectional area, nr (ft*).
Conversion factor, s/day.
Conversion factor,
Equation 101A-4
Dry-gas sample volume at standard conditions, corrected for
leakage (if any), nr (ftj).
Volume of water vapor at standard conditions, m3 (ft3) .
Absolute stack-gas temperature, °K (°R).
Absolute stack-gas pressure" mm Hg (in. Hg) .
0.3858 °K/mm Hg for metric units.
17.64 °R/in. Hg for English units.
-------
Section No. 3.19.10
Date September 21. 1992
Page 18
10.1 Biblioqraphy
1. Same as bibliography in Method 101.
2. Mitchell, W.J., M.R. Midgett, J.C, Suggs, and D. Albrinck. Tesz
Methods to Determine the Mercury Emissions from Sludge Incineraticn
Plants. EPA-600/4-79-058. September 1979. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). Research Triangle Park, NC.
3. ' Wilshire, Frank W., J.E. Knoll, T.E/ Ward, and M.R. Midgett.
Reliability Study of the U.S. EPA's Method 101A - Determination of
Particulate and Gaseous Mercury Emissions. Report No. 600/D-31/21&
AREAL 367, NTIS Ace No. PB91-233361. U.S. Environmental Protectior.
Agency (EPA). Research Triangle Park, NC.
o
o
o
-------
Section No.3.19.11
Date September 3, 1952
Page 1
11.0 REFERENCES
1. Method 101A - Determination of Particulate and Gaseous Mercury Emissions from
Sewage Sludge Incinerators. Federal Register, Volume 47, July 8, 1982, p.
24703.
2. Corrections to Method 101A-, Federal Register, Volume ,49, September 12, 1984,
p. 35768.
3. Corrections to Method 101A. Federal Register, Volume 53, September 23, 1988,
p. 36972. , .
4. Method 101 - Determination of Particulate and Gaseous Mercury Emissions from
Chlor-Alkali Plants - Air Streams. Federal Register, Volume 38, May 6, 1973,
p. 08826.
5. Amendments to Method .101. Federal Register, Volume 47, July 8, 1982, p.
24703.
6.
8.
Corrections to Method 101. Federal Register, Volume 49, September 12, 1984,
p. 35768.
Corrections to Method 101. Federal Register, Volume 53, September 23, 1988,
p. 36972. ' "' '
Wilshire, Frank W., J.E. Knoll, T.E. Ward, and M.R. Midgett. Reliability
Study of the U.S. EPA's Method 101A - Determination of Particulate .and
Gaseous Mercury Emissions. Report No. 600/D-31/219 AREAL 367, NTIS Ace No.
PE91-233361, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. .. " . .
9. Addendum to Specifications for Incinerator Testing at Federal Facilities.
PHS, NCAPC. December 6, 1967.
10. Determining Dust Concentration in a Gas Stream. ASME Performance Test Code
No. 27. New York, NY. 1957.
11.
12.
13.
DeVorkin, Howard, et al. Air Pollution Source Testing Manual. Air Pollution
Control District. Los Angeles, CA. November 1963. -:
Hatch, W.R., and W.I. Ott. Determination of Sub-Microgram Quantities of
Mercury by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry. Anal. Chem. 40:2085-87, 1968.
Mark, L.S. Mechanical Engineers' Handbook. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc. New
York, NY. 1951.
Martin, Robert M. Construction Details of Isokinetic Source Sampli'ng
Equipment. EPA APTD-0581, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Research
Triangle Park, NC. April 1971. :'y
-------
o
Section No.3.19.11
Date September 3, 1992
Page 2
15. Western Precipitation Division of Joy Manufacturing Co. Methods for
Determination of Velocity, Volume, Dust and Mist Content of Gases. Bulletin
WP-50. Los Angeles, CA. 1968.
16. Perry, J.H. Chemical Engineers' Handbook. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc. New
York, NY. 1960.
17. Rom, Jerome J. Maintenance, Calibration, and Operation of Isokinetic Source
Sampling Equipment. EPA APTD-0576, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-
Research Triangle Park, NC. April 1972.
18. Shigehara, R.T., W.F. Todd, and W.S. Smith. Significance of Errors in Stack
Sampling Measurements. Stack Sampling News. 1{3):6-18, September 1973.
19. Smith, W.S., et al. Stack Gas Sampling Improved and Simplified with New
Equipment. APCA Paper No. 67-119. 1967.
20. Smith, W.S., R.T. Shigehara, and W.F. Todd. A Method of Interpreting Stack
Sampling Data. Stack Sampling News. 1(2):8-17, August 1973.
21. Specifications for Incinerator Testing at Federal Facilities. PHS, NCAPA.
1967.
22. Standard Method for Sampling Stacks for Particulate Matter. In: 1971 Annual F j
Book of ASTM Standards, Part 23. ASTM Designation D 2928-71. Philadelphia, PA ^—'
1971.
23. Vennard, J.K. Elementary Fluid Mechanics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York.
1947.
24. Mitchell, W.J., and M.R. Midgett. Improved Procedure for Determining Mercury
Emissions from Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants. J. APCA. 26:674-677, July
1976.
25. Shigehara, R.T. Adjustments in the EPA Nomograph for Different Pitot Tube
Coefficients and Dry Molecular Weights. Stack Sampling News. 2:4-11, October
1974.
26. Vollaro, R.F. Recommended Procedure for Sample Traverses in Ducts Smaller
than 12 Inches in Diameter. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emission
Measurement Branch. Research Triangle Park, NC. November 1976.
27. Klein, R., and C. Hach. Standard Additions: Uses and Limitation in Spectro-
photometric Measurements. Amer. Lab. 9:21, 1977.
28. Water, Atmospheric Analysis. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 31. ASTM
Designation D 1193-74. Philadelphia, PA. 1974.
29. Mitchell, W.J., M.R. Midgett, J.C. Suggs, and D. Albrinck. Test Methods to
Determine the Mercury Emissions from Sludge Incineration Plants. EPA-600-
/4-79-058, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, NC.
September 1979.
O
------- | | |