United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Environmental Monitoring Systems
Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
Research and Development
EPA-600/S4-84-016  Feb. 1984
Project  Summary
Survey  of  Direct Analysis
Methods  for  Organic Compounds
in   Particulate  Matter

C. A. Alexander, J. R. Hoyland, R. H. Barnes, and J. S. Ogden
  Spark source, secondary ion and direct
probe mass spectroscopy and infrared,
Raman  and  photoacoustic  optical
spectroscopy were evaluated for their
present  and potential  usefulness in
direct (i.e., without prior concentra-
tion) qualitative and semiquantitative
analysis of aromatic hydrocarbons in
particulate matter. It was found that
spark source and  secondary ion mass
spectroscopy, and Fourier-Transform
infrared,  Raman  and  photoacoustic
spectroscopy did not provide sufficient
sensitivity for the determination of
environmental levels  (low  ppm  by
weight)  of  polycyclic  aromatic
hydrocarbons  in  particulate  matter.
Direct probe thermal desorption mass
spectroscopy was found to be capable
of  detection  and quantification of
organic compounds, particularly high
molecular weight species not detected
with the  usual  extraction  and gas
chromatography or gas chromatogra-
phy/mass spectroscopic analysis. The
National  Bureau of Standards (NBS)
Standard Reference Material 1648 was
used to evaluate the various techniques.
It is further concluded that the organic
material absorbed on ambient particu-
late matter may be much more complex
than previously suspected.
  This Project Summary was developed
by  EPA's Environmental Monitoring
Systems Laboratory. Research Triangle
Park. NC. to announce key findings of
the research project that is fully docu-
mented in a separate report of the same
title (see Project  Report ordering' in-
formation at back).
Introduction
  Current methodology for analysis of
organic material  in particulate matter
involves extraction procedures which are
tedious,  time  consuming,  and  may
contaminate  the  sample.  Analytical
techniques normally employed for
determining the identity and concentra-
tion of extracted species  include gas
chromatography (GC), liquid chromatog-
raphy (LC), or GC combined with mass
spectrometric detection (GC/MS). The
utility of GC and  GC/MS techniques is
limited by the low volatility of many of the
organic species  of interest, and the
efficiency of extraction is thermodynami-
cally limited by the relative free energies
of adsorption and solution. Because the
current state-of-the-art of  quantitative
analysis is time consuming, costly, and
can yield uncertain or incomplete results,
a study was undrtaken of experimental
methods currently available which might
prove  capable  of  yielding  such
information  without  prior  sample
extraction.  There  are several emerging
techniques which  may be used to
determine  organic  compounds in
particulate matter without  extraction,
i.e., direct  methods. The present study
addresses the question of whether these
direct  methods have  sufficiently low
detection limits (i.e., low ppm by weight)
and quantitative capabilities to be useful
in monitoring applications.
  The objective of this particular program
was to evaluate  five  candidate  direct
methods and to make recommendations
for  further development of  the  most
promising  ones.  A direct  method  is

-------
   defined as  one for  which the sample
   preparation involves  no liquid extraction
   or   other   concentration  steps.  The
   techniques  which  were evaluated were
   (a)  temperature-programmed direct
   probe  mass  spectrometry;  (b)  spark
   source  mass  spectrometry;  (c) photoa-
   coustic spectroscopy;  (d)  Fourier
   transform   infrared   absorbance  and
   Raman spectroscopy;  and  (e) Fourier
   transform reflectance spectroscopy. The
   NBS Standard Reference Material 1648,
   ambient particulate matter, was used in
   the  evaluations. These techniques were
   evaluated for qualitative and semiquanti-
   tative analyses of polynuclear aromatic
   hydrocarbons.  Additionally,  a  limited
   investigation was  made  of  the
   applicability  of secondary   ion  mass
   spectroscopy (SIMS)  to  organic
   compounds adsorbed on the surface of
   particulate samples.
     Fluorescence  spectroscopy, which is
   expected to have greater sensitivity than
   the optical techniques covered here, was
   not  evaluated since it was being studied
   in another  project.

   Conclusions and
   Recommendations
     The  results  of  this  experimental
   assessment of presently available direct
   analysis techniques  show that only the
   thermal desorption  mass spectrometry
   technique has much chance of being of
   general applicability. The spark source
   MS  technique does not work in enough
   cases to be  of practical value. Fast atom
   bombardment and molecular secondary
   ion mass spectrometry are both sensitive
   but   are  not  always  effective  for
   particulate samples  because the
   polycyclic  aromatic   material  in   the
       particulate  sample  is  not  readily
       accessible at the surface exposed to the
       ion beam. The optical techniques studied
       suffer from the same problem since the
       organic compounds have selected ener-
       getically favorable sites in the particulate
       phase, and these sites can be optically
       shielded from  the  probing  radiation.
       Therefore the thermal  desorption mass
       spectrometry technique is the most likely
       candidate for successful direct analysis of
       organic compounds in particulate matter.
       This technique  can yield  quantitative
       data.  Results obtained on the National
       Bureau  of  Standards  SRM  1648
       generally duplicated those  obtained  by
       extraction   procedures,  but  thermal
       desorption is more efficient. It was shown
       that significant quantities of polycyclic
       aromatics with heteroatoms, which are
       generally missed by the usual extraction-
       GC-MS  technique,   are   present  in
       particulate  matter. Whether these occur
       in nature or were formed on the particles
       after   sample  collection   cannot   be
       ascertained at this time. However,  their
       presence in such abundance needs  to be
       addressed   in   any   overall  protocol
       involving extraction and subsequent GC-
       MS analysis.
  Some preliminary experiments with a
state-of-the-art quadrupole mass spec-
trometer have indicated that the number
and quantity  of  organic  species in
particulate matter may be even higher
than indicated by the mass-limited scans
made with the quantitative direct probe
mass spectrometric technique.
  It is recommended  that direct probe
thermal  desorption mass spectrometer
studies should be continued in  order to
better  define  the  limitations   of  the
technique  and to develop temperature
programming  which  will  enhance
thermal fractionation of organic species.
It does not seem possible at this time to
fully identify and quantify all the therm-
ally desorbed  species   in  particulate
matter.  Consequently,  future  efforts
should be directed toward simplification
of  the  mass  spectra  by  careful
temperature control. Possible simplifica-
tion in compound identification should be
explored   through  the   utilization  of
chemical ionization with several different
reagent gases. Additional studies directly
comparing  the thermal desorption/MS
approach with conventional extraction/
GC  or  GC/MS approaches  should be
conducted.
          C. A. Alexander, J. R. Hoyland, R. H. Barnes, and J. S. Ogden are with Battelle
            Columbus Laboratories. Columbus. OH 43201.
          D. R. Scott and R. G. Lewis are the EPA Project Officers (see below).
          The complete report, entitled "Survey of Direct Analysis Methods for Organic
            Compounds in Particulate Matter." (Order No. PB 84-154 723; Cost: $10.00.
            subject to change) will be available only from:
                 National Technical Information Service
                 5285 Port Royal Road
                 Springfield. VA  22161
                 Telephone: 703-487-4650
          The EPA Project Officers can be contacted at:
                 Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
                 U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
                 Research Triangle Park. NC 27711
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 452G3
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use S300

-------