United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Publication 9320.7-051
Solid Waste and October 1992
Emergency Response
&EPA Supplementary Materials:
National Priorities List,
Final and Proposed Rules
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
Hazardous Site Evaluation Division (OS-5204G)
Intermittent Bulletin
Volume 2, Number 2
The National Priorities List (NPL) informs the
public of uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that
warrant further investigation to determine if they pose
risks to public health or the environment. Such sites
are eligible for long-term "remedial action" financed
under the Trust Fund established by the
Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA)
as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA). In October
Table of Contents
How Sites Are Placed on the NPL 2
Statutory Requirements and Listing Policies 2
NPL Status (October 1992) 3
Key Dates in Superfund 5
Removing Proposed Sites 6
Lists and Data Summaries 7
Federal Facilities Section (by State) 9
Proposed Sites (by State) 13
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL 15
NPL Sites Per State/Territory (by Total Sites) 20
NPL Sites Per EPA Region 21
Federal Register Notices 23
-------
1990, CERCLA was extended to September 30,
1994. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has the primary responsibility for managing
the Superfund program.
HOW SITES ARE PLACED ON THE NPL
EPA uses informal rulemaking to place sites on
the NPL. Sites are first proposed to the NPL in the
Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments
on the sites (typically for 60 days), responds to the
comments, and finally places on the NPL those sites
that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Section 300.425(c) of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), the Federal regulation by which CERCLA is
implemented (55FR 8845, March 8, 1990), provides
three mechanisms for placing sites on the NPL. The
primary mechanism is EPA's Hazard Ranking System
(HRS). The original HRS, developed in 1982,
evaluated the relative threat a site posed to human
health or the environment over five "pathways," or
routes of exposure. The HRS score was based on the
evaluation of three pathways through which
contaminants can migrate: ground water, surface
water, and air. The other two pathways, direct
contact and fire/explosion, were evaluated to
determine the need for immediate removal
(emergency) action. HRS scores ranged from 0 to
100. An HRS score of 28.50 was selected as the
cutoff point for the first proposed NPL to identify at
least 400 sites, the minimum suggested by CERCLA.
On December 14, 1990 (55FR 51532), EPA
revised the HRS, as required by SARA. The revised
HRS became effective on March 14, 1991. It is a
more comprehensive and accurate scoring system
than the original HRS and may add new types of sites
to the NPL.
The revised HRS retains the same cutoff score
and basic approach as the original HRS, while
incorporating SARA requirements as well as
improvements identified as necessary by EPA and the
public. The revised HRS retains the ground water,
surface water, and air pathways, drops the direct
contact and fire/explosion pathways, and adds a
fourth pathway, soil exposure. All four can be used
to calculate the site score.
The second mechanism for placing sites on the
NPL allows States or Territories to designate one top-
priority site regardless of score. Of the 57 States and
Territories, 38 have designated top-priority sites. Six
of these sites have been deleted from the NPL
because no further response was necessary.
The third mechanism allows listing a site if it
meets all three of these requirements:
• The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry (ATSDR) of the U.S. Public Health
Service has issued a health advisory that
recommends removing people from the site.
• EPA determines the site poses a significant
threat to public health.
• EPA anticipates it will be more cost-effective
to use its remedial authority (available only at
NPL sites) than to use its emergency removal
authority to respond to the site.
Six sites have been proposed to the NPL on the
basis of ATSDR advisories:
° Four are on the NPL: Forest Glen Mobile
Home Subdivision, Niagara Falls, NY, and
Radium Chemical Co., Inc., New York City,
NY (54 FR 48184, November 21, 1989);
White Chemical Corp., Newark NJ (56 FR
35840, September 29, 1991); and Austin
Avenue Radiation Site (October 1992).
« One, Lansdowne Radiation Site, Lansdowne,
PA (56 FR 46121, September 10, 1991), has
been deleted from the NPL because all
appropriate response has been completed.
• One, Quail Run Mobile Manor, Gray Summit,
MO, was proposed on September 8, 1983 (48
FR 40674) but was dropped from further
consideration on February 11, 1991 (56 FR
5598). Because of an EPA removal action,
ATSDR had rescinded its health advisory.
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
AND LISTING POLICIES
CERCLA restricts EPA's authority to respond
to certain sites by expressly excluding some
substances -- petroleum, for example -- from the
definition of "release." In addition, as a matter of
policy, EPA may choose not to use CERCLA
-------
because the Federal government can undertake or
enforce cleanup under other laws, thus preserving
CERCLA funds for sites not covered by other laws.
EPA has chosen not to use CERCLA for certain
types of sites regulated by Subtitle C of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). However,
if EPA later determines that sites not listed as a
matter of policy are not being properly responded to,
it may consider placing them on the NPL.
RCRA-Related Sites
When the first final NPL was promulgated in
September 1983, EPA announced certain listing
policies relating to sites that might qualify for the
NPL. One of these policies involved facilities subject
to RCRA Subtitle C. EPA's policy was generally not
to place on the NPL, RCRA "regulated units" (for
example, land disposal units that received hazardous
waste after the effective date of the RCRA land
disposal regulations) because EPA can require the
owner/operator to clean up under RCRA. The
RCRA cleanup process and standards are similar to
those under CERCLA, ensuring that all actions taken
will protect human health and the environment.
In November 1984, the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments (HSWA) to RCRA were enacted,
expanding EPA's authority to require corrective
measures under Subtitle C. As a result of this
broadened RCRA authority, EPA revised its policy
for placing non-Federal RCRA-regulated sites on the
NPL, and on June 10, 1986 (54 FR 21057)
announced that facilities subject to RCRA Subtitle C
corrective action authorities would be placed on the
NPL if one or more of these conditions exist:
NPL Status (October 1992)
Sites on final NPL
• General Superrund Section
• Federal Facilities Section
(1,085)
(123)
Sites remaining on proposed NPL
• General Superrund Section (25)
• Federal Facilities Section (3)
NPL Completions List
• Completions (105)
• Deletions (44)
Sites dropped from proposed NPL
• Policy issues (e.g. RCRA) (43)
• HRS score below 28.50 (33)
*A11 but 1 in General Superfund Section
1,208
28
1,236
149<
76
• The facilities are owned by persons who have
demonstrated an inability to finance
appropriate corrective action by invoking
bankruptcy laws.
• The facilities have lost authorization to operate
(also known as the Loss of Interim Status, or
LOIS provision), and there are additional
indications that the owner or operator is
unwilling to undertake corrective action.
The facilities have not lost authorization to
operate but have a clear history of
unwillingness to undertake corrective action.
These situations are determined on a case-by-
case basis.
-------
On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978) and October
9, 1989 (54 FR 41000), EPA announced additional
components of the NPL/RCRA policy. As a matter
of policy, EPA will list four additional categories of
RCRA-related sites:
* Facilities that were treating, storing, or
disposing of Subtitle C hazardous waste after
November 19, 1980, but that did not file a
"Part A," the initial part of the permit
application, by that date as required and have
little or no history of compliance with RCRA.
EPA believes that these non- or late filers,
although they are technically subject to RCRA,
are not likely to be cleaned up expeditiously
under RCRA and so should be on the NPL.
However, if such facilities have complied with
RCRA, EPA may consider whether listing is
necessary.
• Facilities with permits for the treatment,
storage, or disposal of hazardous waste issued
before enactment of HSWA, and whose
owners/operators will not voluntarily modify
the permit. Pre-HSWA permittees are not
required to take corrective action for releases.
Under RCRA Section 3004(u), EPA does not
have the authority to modify a pre-HSWA
permit for corrective action until the permit is
reissued. Many pre-HSWA permits are for 10
years. Since the last pre-HSWA permit was
issued prior to November 8, 1984, it could be
1994 before EPA could modify some permits
to include corrective action. In these
cases,EPA believes CERCLA authorities will
result in the most expeditious cleanup.
• Facilities that filed a Part A permit application
for treatment, storage, or disposal of Subtitle
C hazardous waste as a precautionary measure
only. Such facilities -- for example,
generators, transporters, or recyclers of
hazardous waste — are not subject to Subtitle
C corrective action authorities. These are
referred to as protective filers.
• Facilities that at one time treated or stored
Subtitle C hazardous waste but have since
converted to generator-only status (i.e.,
facilities that now store hazardous waste for 90
days or less) or any other hazardous waste
activity not requiring Interim Status. These
facilities, whose Part A permit applications
have been withdrawn with EPA or State
approval, are referred to as converters. EPA
believes it has the authority under RCRA
Section 3008(u) to compel corrective action at
such facilities. However, RCRA's corrective
action program currently focuses primarily on
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (due
to permitting deadlines in RCRA). Therefore,
this category should be on the NPL to ensure
expeditious cleanup. However, if a consent
order requiring remedial action is in effect, a
converter need not be listed.
Federal Facility Sites
CERCLA Section 120(a) requires that Federal
facilities be subject to and comply with CERCLA in
the same manner as any nongovernmental entity.
CERCLA Section lll(e)(3), however, generally
prohibits use of the Trust Fund for remedial actions
at Federally-owned facilities. Thus, Federal agencies
must use their own funds for cleanup. Federal sites
are listed in a separate section of Appendix B, rather
than in the General Superfund Section.
Because most Federal facilities have RCRA-
regulated units within their boundaries, EPA
determined that a separate NPL/RCRA policy should
be adopted for Federal facilities. As a result, on
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10520), EPA announced it
would place on the NPL those sites located on
Federally owned or operated facilities that meet the
NPL eligibility requirements — e.g., HRS scores of
28.50 or greater — even if the Federal facility also is
subject to the corrective action authorities of RCRA
Subtitle C. Cleanup, if appropriate, could then
proceed at those sites under either CERCLA or
RCRA. The policy is based on several
considerations:
• Congress clearly intended that Federal facility
sites should be on the NPL.
« Strict application of the non-Federal
NPL/RCRA policy would exclude virtually all
Federal facility sites from the NPL because
they would not likely meet any of the criteria
necessary for listing (inability to pay as
evidenced by invocation of bankruptcy laws or
demonstrated unwillingness to comply with
RCRA).
• Placing RCRA-regulated Federal sites on the
NPL serves the primary purpose of listing
Federal facility sites to advise the public of the
status of Federal government cleanup efforts.
-------
Key Dates in Superfund
Legislation
• Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) enacted December 11, 1980; Trust Fund of $1.6
billion authorized over 5 years
• CERCLA amended by Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act (SARA) enacted October 17, 1986; Trust Fund of $8.5 billion
authorized over 5 years
• CERCLA extended to September 30, 1994; an additional $5.1 billion
authorized
Federal regulation implementing Superfund: National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP)
• Revised July 16, 1982 (47FR 31180) to incorporate CERCLA
requirements
• Revised March 8, 1990 (55 FR 8666) in response to CERCLA Section
105, amended by SARA
Hazard Ranking System
• Promulgated July 16, 1982(47 FR31180) as Appendix A of the NCP
• Revised December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532) in response to CERCLA
Section 105(c), added by SARA; effective date March 14, 1991
National Priorities List
• Promulgated September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658) as Appendix B of the
NCP
• Must be updated at least annually
• Last sites proposed under original MRS promulgated February 11,
1991 (56 FR 5598); Construction Completion category activated
(56 FR 5634)
• First sites proposed under revised MRS July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840)
• First sites added to NPL under revised MRS (October 1992)
-------
• Listing these sites helps Federal agencies set
priorities and focus cleanup efforts on those
sites that present the most senous problem.
Radioactive Release Sites
CERCLA Section 101(22) excludes several
types of releases of radioactive materials from the
statutory definition of "release." These releases are
therefore not eligible for CERCLA response actions
or the NPL. The exclusions apply to (1) releases of
source, by-product, or special nuclear material from
a nuclear incident if these releases are subject to
financial protection requirements under Section 170
of the Atomic Energy Act and (2) any releases of
source, by-product, or special nuclear material from
any processing site designated under the Uranium
Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978.
Accordingly, such radioactive releases have not been
considered eligible for the NPL.
As a policy matter, EPA has also chosen not
to list releases of source, by-product, or special
nuclear material from any facility with a current
license issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC), on the grounds that NRC has full authority to
require cleanup of releases from such facilities. EPA
will, however, list releases from facilities that hold a
current license issued by a State pursuant to an
agreement between the State and the NRC under
Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act. Facilities
whose licenses are no longer in effect are also
considered for listing.
REMOVING PROPOSED SITES
As of October 1992, 7.6 sites (see page 13)
have been proposed for the NPL but subsequently
removed from further consideration, most of them
because their final HRS scores were below the 28.50
cutoff or they are subject to RCRA Subtitle C. Three
of the sites were reproposed on February 1992 (57
FR 4824) after being rescored with the revised HRS.
-------
LISTS AND DATA SUMMARIES
-------
-------
National Priorities List,
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
October 1992
Date
St
AK
AK
AK
AK
AK
AL
AL
AZ
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
CO
Site Name
Eielson Air Force Base
Elmendorf Air Force Base
Fort Uainuright
Naval Air Station Adak
Standard Steel & Metals Salvage Yard (USOOT)
4 Final + 1 Proposed = 5
Alabama Army Ammunition Plant
Amiston Army Depot (Southeast Industrial Area)
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Luke Air Force Base
Williams Air Force Base
Yuma Marine Corps Air Station
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
Barstow Marine Corps Logistics Base
Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base
Castle Air Force Base
Concord Naval Weapons Station
Edwards Air Force Base
El Toro Marine Corps Air Station
Fort Ord
George Air Force Base
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA)
Laurence Liver-more National Laboratory (USDOE)
Laurence Livermore National Laboratory (Site 300)
(USOOE)
March Air Force Base
Mather Air Force Base (once listed as Mather Air Force
Base (ACSW Disposal Site))
McClellan Air Force Base (Ground Water Contamination)
Hoffett Naval Air Station
Norton Air Force Base
Riverbank Army Ammunition Plant
Sacramento Army Depot
Sharpe Army Depot
Tracy Defense Depot
Travis Air Force Base
Treasure Island Naval Station-Hunters Point Annex
21 Final + 1 Proposed = 22
Air Force Plant PJKS
Rocky Flats Plant (USDOE)
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
City/County
Fairbanks N Star Bor
Greater Anchorage Bo
Fairbanks N Star Bor
Adak Island
Anchorage
Childersburg
Anniston
Glendale
Chandler
Yuma
Barstow
San Diego County
Merced
Concord
Kern County
El Toro
Marina
Victorville
Pasadena
Livermore
Livermore
Riverside
Sacramento
Sacramento
Sunnyvale
San Bernardino
Riverbank
Sacramento
Lathrop
Tracy
Solano County
San Francisco
Waterton
Golden
Adams County
Proposed
7/89
7/89
7/89
10/92
7/89
10/84
10/84
7/89
7/89
6/88
7/89
7/89
10/84
2/92
7/89
6/88
7/89
7/89
2/92
10/84
7/89
7/89
10/84
10/84
4/85
10/84
6/88
10/84
10/84
7/89
7/89
7/89
7/89
10/84
10/84
Final
11/89
8/90
8/90
8/90
7/87
3/89
8/90
11/89
2/90
11/89
11/89
7/87
8/90
2/90
2/90
2/90
10/92
7/87
8/90
11/89
11/89
7/87
7/87
7/87
2/90
7/87
7/87
8/90
11/89
11/89
11/89
10/89
7/87
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
CT New London Submarine Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
DE Dover Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
FL Cecil Field Naval Air Station
FL Homestead Air Force Base
FL Jacksonville Naval Air Station
FL Pensacola Naval Air Station
New London
Dover
Jacksonville
Homestead
Jacksonville
Pensacola
10/89 8/90
10/84 3/89
7/89
7/89
7/89
7/89
11/89
8/90
11/89
11/89
4 Final + 0 Proposed =
-------
National Priorities List,
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
October 1992
St Site Name
City/County
Date
Proposed Final
GA Marine Corps Logistics Base
GA Robins Air Force Base (Landfill #4/Sludge Lagoon)
(once listed as Robins Air Force Base)
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
GU Andersen Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
HI Pearl Harbor Naval Coop Iex
HI Schofield Barracks
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
IA Iowa Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
ID Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (USDOE)
ID Mountain Home Air Force Base
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
IL Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (Load-Assembly-Packing
Area)
IL Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (Manufacturing Area)
IL Sangamo Electric Dump/Crab Orchard National Wildlife
Refuge (USDOI)
IL Savanna Army Depot Activity
-------
National Priorities List,
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
October 1992
St Site Name
City/County
Date
Proposed Final
HO WeIdon Spring Former Army Ordnance Works
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
NC Camp Lejeune Military Reservation (once listed as Camp
Lejeune Marine Corps Base)
1 Final * 0 Proposed = 1
NE Cornhusker Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
NX Pease Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
NJ Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center
(USDOT)
NJ Fort Oix (Landfill Site)
NJ Naval Air Engineering Center
NJ Naval Weapons Station Earle (Site A)
NJ Picatinny Arsenal
NJ W.R. Grace & Co., Inc./Wayne Interim Storage Site
(USDOE) (once listed as W.R. Grace & Co., Inc. (Wayne
Plant)
6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6
NM Cal West Metals (USS8A)
NH Lee Acres Landfill (USDOI)
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
NY Brookhaven National Laboratory (USDOE)
NY Griffiss Air Force Base
NY Plattsburgh Air Force Base
NY Seneca Army Depot
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
OH Feed Materials Production Center (USDOE)
OH Mound Plant (USDOE)
OH Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
OK Tinker Air Force Base (Soldier Creek/Building 3001)
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
OR Umatilla Army Depot (Lagoons)
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
PA Letterkenny Army Depot (Property Disposal Office Area)
PA Letterkenny Army Depot (Southeast Area)
PA Naval Air Development Center (8 Waste Areas)
PA Tobyhanna Army Depot
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
PR Naval Security Group Activity
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
St. Charles County
Onslow County
Hall County
Portsmouth/Neuington
Atlantic County
Pemberton Township
Lakehurst
Colts Neck
Rockaway Township
Wayne Township
Fernald
Hiamisburg
Dayton
Oklahoma City
Hermiston
Franklin County
Chambersburg
Warminster Township
Tobyhanna
Sabana Seca
7/89 2/90
6/88 10/89
10/84 7/87
7/89 2/90
7/89 8/90
10/84 7/87
9/85 7/87
10/84 8/90
7/89 2/90
9/83 9/84
Lemitar
Farmington
Upton
Rome
Plattsburgh
Romulus
6/88
6/88
7/89
10/84
7/89
7/89
3/89
8/90
11/89
7/87
11/89
8/90
7/89
7/89
6/88
11/89
11/89
10/89
4/85 7/87
10/84 7/87
4/85
10/84
6/86
7/89
3/89
7/87
10/89
8/90
6/88 10/89
11
-------
National Priorities List,
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
October 1992
St Site Nome
City/County
Date
Proposed Final
RI Davisville Naval Construction Battalion Center
RI Newport Naval Education & Training Center
2 Final + 0 Proposed * 2
SC Savannah River Site (USDOE)
1 Final + 0 Proposed » 1
SO Ellsworth Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
TN Memphis Defense Depot
TN Milan Army Ammunition Plant
TN Oak Ridge Reservation (USDOE)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
TX Air Force Plant #4 (General Dynamics)
TX Lone Star Army Ammunition Plant
TX Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant
TX Pantex Plant (USDOE)
3 Final + 1 Proposed = 4
UT Hill Air Force Base
UT Monti cello Mill Tailings (USDOE)
UT Ogden Defense Depot
UT Tooele Army Depot (North Area)
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
VA Defense General Supply Center
VA Naval Surface Warfare Center • Dahlgren
VA Naval Weapons Station - Yorktown
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
UA Bangor Naval Submarine Base
UA Bangor Ordnance Disposal
UA Bonneville Power Administration Ross Complex (USDOE)
UA Fairchild Air Force Base (4 Uaste Areas)
UA Fort Lewis (Landfill No. 5)
UA Fort Lewis Logistics Center
UA Hamilton Island Landfill (USA/COE)
UA Hanford 100-Area (USDOE)
UA Hanford 1100-Area (USDOE)
UA Hanford 200-Area (USDOE)
UA Hanford 300-Area (USDOE)
UA HcChord Air Force Base (Wash Rack/Treatment Area)
UA Naval Air Station, Uhidbey Island (Ault Field)
UA Naval Air Station, Uhidbey Island (Seaplane Base)
UA Naval Undersea Warfare Engineering Station (4 Uaste
Areas)
15 Final + 0 Proposed = 15
UY F.E. Warren Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
123 Final * 3 Proposed = 126
North Kingstown 7/89 11/89
Newport 7/89 11/89
Aiken 7/89 11/89
Rapid City 10/89 8/90
Memphis 2/92 10/92
Milan 10/84 7/87
Oak Ridge 7/89 11/89
Fort Worth 10/84 8/90
Texarkana 10/84 7/87
Karnack 7/89 8/90
Pantex Village 7/91
Ogden 10/84 7/87
Honticello 7/89 11/89
Ogden 10/84 7/87
Tooele 10/84 8/90
Chesterfield County 10/84 7/87
Dahlgren 2/92 10/92
Yorktown 2/92 10/92
Silverdale
Bremerton
Vancouver
Spokane County
Tacoma
Tillicum
North Bonneville
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Tacoma
Uhidbey Island
Uhidbey Island
Keyport
7/89
10/84
7/89
6/88
10/84
7/89
7/91
6/88
6/83
6/88
6/88
10/84
9/85
9/85
6/86
8/90
7/87
11/89
3/89
7/87
11/89
10/92
10/89
10/89
10/89
10/89
7/87
2/90
2/90
10/89
Cheyenne
7/89 2/90
12
-------
National Priorities List,
Proposed Sites, by State
October 1992
St
Site Name
Location
Notes
a
AK Federal Facility Sites
Naval Air Station Adak
0 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 1
CA General Superfund Sites
Cooper Drum Co.
Del Amo Facility
GBF, Inc., Dump
Stoker Company
Federal Facility Sites
Concord Naval Weapons Station
4 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 5
CO General Superfund Sites
Smeltertown Site
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
FL General Superfund Sites
Broward County--21st Manor Dump
Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tarpon Springs Plant)
Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tampa Plant)
3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3
IA General Superfund Sites
Waterloo Coal Gasification Plant
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
IN General Superfund Sites
U.S. Smelter and Lead Refinery, Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
KY General Superfund Sites
National Southuire Aluminum Co.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
HA General Superfund Sites
Blackburn & Union Privileges
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
HO General Superfund Sites
Spectron, Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
HN General Superfund Sites
Lake Elmo Airport/Ground Water Contamination
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
NC General Superfund Sites
General Electric Co./Shepherd Farm
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
NE General Superfund Sites
American Shizuki Corp./Ogallala Electronics and
Manufacturing, Inc.
Bruno Co-op Association/Associated Properties
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
NH General Superfund Sites
AT&SF (Albuquerque)
Rinchem Co., Inc.
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
SC General Superfund Sites
Koppers Co., Inc. (Charleston Plant)
Adak Island
South Gate
Los Angeles
Antioch
Imperial
Concord
Salida
Fort Lauderdale
Tarpon Springs
Tampa
Waterloo
East Chicago
Hawesville
Walpole
Cecil County
Baytown Township
East Flat Rock
Ogallala
Bruno
Albuquerque
Albuquerque
Charleston
13
-------
National Priorities List,
Proposed Sites, by State
October 1992
page 2
St
Site Name
Location
Notes"
SO
TX
UT
VI
UA
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites
1
General Superfund Sites
Annie Creek Mine Tailings
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
Federal Facility Sites
Pantex Plant (USOOE)
0 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites
1
General Superfund Sites
Richardson Flat Tailings
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
Tutu Uellfield
1 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
Spokane Junkyard/Associated Properties
Tulalip Landfill
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
25 General Superfund Sites + 3 Federal Facility Sites = 28
Lead
Pantex Village
Summit County
Tutu
Spokane County
Harysville
A = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(If scored, MRS score need not be >28.50).
S = State top priority (If scored, HRS score need not be >28.50).
14
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
October 1992
Date
st
AR
AR
AR
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
DC
DE
Site Name
Allen Transformer
Crittenden County Landfill
Magnolia City Landfill
Kingman Airport Industrial Area
Mesa Area Ground Water Contamination
FHC Corp. (Fresno Plant)
Hewlett-Packard
IBM Corp. (San Jose Plant)
Kaiser Steel Corp.(Fontana Plant)
Kearney-KPF
Mar ley Cooling Tower Co.
Precision Monolithic, Inc.
Rhone-Poulenc, Inc./Zoecon Corp. (once listed as
Zoecon Corp. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc.)
Signetics, Inc.
Solvent Service, Inc.
Southern Pacific Transportation
Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.
Martin-Marietta(Denver Aerospace)
Fort Lincoln Barrel Site
Old Brine Sludge Landfill
Location
Ft. Smith
Marion
Magnolia
Kingman
Mesa
Fresno
Palo Alto
San Jose
Fontana
Stockton
Stockton
Santa Clara
East Palo Alto
Sunnyvale
San Jose
Roseville
San Jose
Waterloo
Washington
Delaware City
Proposed
10/23/81
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/26/89
54 FR 43778
12/30/82
47FR 58476
6/10/86
51FR 21099
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
6/24/88
53FR 23988
6/24/88
53 FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
6/24/88
53 FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/23/81
9/08/83
48FR 40674
Remov
Score8
12/30/82C
47FR 58476
9/08/83
48FR 40658
8/30/90
55FR 35502
9/21/84d
49FR 37070
6/10/86
51FR 21054
9/21/84
49FR 37070
ed
Other6
2/11/91
56FR 5598
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54 FR 41000
8/30/90
55FR 35502
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
8/30/90
55FR 35502
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
12/30/826
47FR 58476
15
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
October 1992
page
Date
Removed
St
DE
FL
FL
FL
GA
HI
HI
HI
HI
HI
HI
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
ID
II
IL
II
Site Name
Pigeon Point Landfill
Davidson Lunfcer Co.
Hontco Research Products, Inc.
Pratt & Whitney Aircraft/United Technologies Corp.
01 in Corp. (Areas 1,2 & 4)
Kunia Wells I
Kunia Wells II
Mil Hani Wells
Waiawa Shaft
Waipahu Wells
Waipio Heights Wells II
A.Y. McDonald Industries, Inc.
Chcmplex Co.
Frit Industries (Humboldt Plant)
John Deere (Dubuque Works)
U.S. Nameplate Co.
Flynn Lumber Co.
Sheffield (US Ecology, Inc.)
Stauffer Chemical Co. (Chicago Heights Plant)
Warner Electric Brake & Clutch Co
Location
New Castle
South Miami
Hoi lister
West Palm Beach
Augusta
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Dubuque
C 1 i nton/Camanche
Hmfcoldt
Dubuque
Mount Vernon
Ca I dwell
Sheffield
Chicago Heights
Roscoe
Proposed
1/22/87
52FR 2492
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/18/85
50FR 37950
9/08/83
48FR 40674
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
4/10/85
50FR 14115
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/15/84
49FR 40320
1/22/87
52FR 2492
6/24/88
53FR 23988
Score8
10/04/89
54FR 41015
6/10/86
51FR 21054
3/31/89
54 FR 13296
9/08/83
48FR 40658
10/04/89
54FR 41015
Otherb
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
2/1 1/91 f
56FR 5598
2/11/91f
56FR 5598
2/11/91f
56FR 5598
2/11/91f
56FR 5598
2/11/91f
56FR 5598
2/1 1/91 f
56FR 5598
10/04/89
54FR 41000
2/11/91
56FR 5598
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
8/30/90
55FR 35502
16
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
October 1992
page 3
Date
Removed
St
IN
IN
IN
KS
MI
HI
HI
HI
HI
HI
HO
HO
MS
HS
HT
MT
NE
NE
NJ
NJ
Site Name
Firestone Industrial Products Co.
Mccarty's Bald Knob Landfill
Parrot Road Dump
National Industrial Environmental Services
E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. (Montague Plant)
Ford Motor Co. (Sludge Lagoon)
Hooker (Montague Plant)
Lacks Industries, Inc.
Lena wee Disposal Service, Inc., Landfill
Littlefield Township Dump
Findett Corp.
Quail Run Mobile Manor
Gautier Oil Co., Inc.
Plastifax, Inc.
Burlington Northern Railroad (Somers Tie-Treating
Plant)
Comet Oi I Co.
Monroe Auto Equipment Co.
Phillips Chemical Co.
Horstmann's Dump
Jame Fine Chemical
Location
Noblesville
Ht. Vernon
New Haven
Fur ley
Montague
Ypsilanti
Montague
Grand Rapids
Adrian
Oden
St. Charles
Gray Summit
Gautier
Gulf port
Somers
Billings
Cozad
Beatrice
East Hanover
Bound Brook
Proposed
9/18/85
50FR 37950
1/22/87
52FR 2492
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
1/22/87
52FR 2492
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/08/83
48FR 40674
6/24/88
53FR 23988
7/23/82
10/15/84
49FR 40320
6/24/88
53FR 23988
9/18/85
50FR 37950
12/30/82
47FR 58476
1/22/87
52FR 2492
10/15/84
49FR 40320
Score*
10/04/89
54FR 41015
9/08/83
48FR 40658
3/31/89
54FR 13296
8/30/90
55FR 35502
6/10/86
51FR 21054
9/21/84
49FR 37070
8/30/90
55FR 35502
9/08/83h
48FR 40658
2/11/91
56FR 5598
9/08/83
48FR 40658
3/31/89
54 FR 13296
6/1 0/86 '
51FR 21054
Otherb
10/04/89
54 FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
2/11/91
56FR 5598
2/11/919
56FR 5598
2/11/91
56FR 5598
10/04/89
54FR 41000
17
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
October 1992
page
Date
Removed
St
NJ
OH
OK
OK
PA
PA
TX
TX
UT
UT
UT
VA
UA
UA
UI
WV
Site Nome
Matlack, Inc.
General Electric Co. (Coshocton Plant)
Kerr-HcGee Corp. (Gushing Plant)
Sunray Oil Co. Refinery
Kcyser Avenue Borehole
Rohm and Haas Co. Landfill
Pig Road
Rio Grande Oil Co. Refinery
Mayflower Mountain Tailings Pond
Olson/Neihart Reservoir
Silver Creek Tailings
IBM Corp. (Manassas Plant Spill)
Quendall Terminal
Rosch Property
Fort Howard Paper Co. Sludge Lagoons
Mobay Chemical Corp. (New Mart insvi lie Plant)
Location
Woolwich Township
Coshocton
Gushing
Allen
Scranton
Bristol Township
New Uaverly
Sour Lake
Wasatch County
Uasatch County
Park City
Manassas
Renton
Roy
Green Bay
New Martinsvi lie
Proposed
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/26/89
54FR 43778
6/24/88
53FR 23988
6/24/88
53FR 23988
4/10/85
50FR 14115
9/08/83
48FR 40674
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/08/83
48FR 40674
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
Score8
2/11/91
56FR 5598
8/30/90
55FR 35502
2/21/90
55FR 6154
6/10/86
51FR 21054
8/30/90
55FR 35502
6/10/86
51FR 21054
3/31/89
54FR 13296
6/10/86
51FR 21054
9/21/84
49FR 37070
8/30/90
55FR 35502
Otherb
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/17/86J
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
Munber of sites removed: 76
?Final MRS score below 28.50.
Subject to RCRA Subtitle C, except as noted.
.On Interim Priorities List announced October 23, 1981; removed at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476, December 30, 1982).
Contamination occurs naturally.
eOn Interim Priorities List announced October 23, 1981; removed at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476, December 30, 1982),
,a Federal facility site and so ineligible at the time.
Pending development of EPA pesticide policy.
(Footnotes continue on the next page.)
18
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL page 4
October 1992
?No longer meets health advisory issued by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
On Expanded Eligibility List announced July 23, 1982; removed at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476, December 30, 1982)
•because State withdrew top-priority designation, HRS score below 28.50.
.Included in Brook Industrial Park, listed October 4, 1989 (54FR 41015).
'Removed per SARA Section 118(p).
NOTE: The following four sites were proposed, removed, and then reproposed. In this case, the site has been listed:
• Van Dale Junkyard, Marietta, OH, proposed December 30, 1982 (47FR 58476); removed September 8, 1983 (48FR
40658); reproposed October 15. 1984 (49FR 40320); listed June 10, 1986 (51FR 21054).
These three sites have been reproposed under the revised HRS:
• Concord Naval weapons Station, Concord, CA: proposed June 24, 1988 (53FR 23988); removed August 30, 1990 (55FR
35502); reproposed February 7, 1992 (57FR 4824).
• GBF, Inc., Antioch, CA: proposed June 24, 1988 (53FR 23988); removed October 4, 1989 (54FR 41015); reproposed
February 7, 1992 (57FR 4824).
• Richardson Flat Tailings, Summit County, UT: proposed June 24, 1988 (53FR 23988); removed February 11, 1991
(56FR 5598); reproposed February 7, 1992 (57FR 4824).
19
-------
National Priorities List,
Final and Proposed Sites Per State/Territory
(by Total Sites)
October 1992
Final
State/Territory
New Jersey
Pennsylvania
California
New York
Michigan
Florida
Washington
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Illinois
Indiana
Ohio
Texas
Massachusetts
South Carolina
Missouri
North Carolina
Virginia
Iowa
Delaware
Kentucky
Colorado
New Hampshire
Connecticut
Tennessee
Georgia
Utah
Alabama
Arkansas
Louisiana
Rhode Island
New Mexico
Arizona
Kansas
Maryland
Nebraska
Oklahoma
Idaho
Maine
Oregon
Puerto Rico
Montana
Vermont
Alaska
West Virginia
South Dakota
Wyoming
Guam
Hawaii
Mississippi
North Dakota
Nevada
Virgin Islands
American Samoa
Commonwealth of Marianas
District of Columbia
Trust Territories
Gen
102
94
69
79
77
48
33
39
40
33
32
30
25
22
22
20
21
19
19
18
18
13
16
14
11
11
8
10
12
11
10
7
7
9
7
7
9
7
7
8
8
8
8
2
5
2
2
1
0
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
Fed
6
4
21
4
0
4
15
2
0
4
0
3
3
3
1
3
1
3
1
1
0
3
1
1
3
2
4
2
0
1
2
2
3
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
0
0
4
0
1
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Proposed
Gen
0
0
4
0
0
3
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Fed
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
108
98
95
83
77
55
50
42
40
37
33
33
29
26
24
23
23
22
21
19
19
17
17
15
14
13
13
12
12
12
12
11
10
10
10
10
10
9
9
9
9
8
8
7
5
4
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
Total
1085
123
25
1236
20
-------
National Priorities List,
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region)
October 1992
Reg State/Territory
Final
Gen Fed
Proposed
Gen Fed
Total
01
Connecticut
Massachusetts
Maine
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont
14
22
7
16
10
8
1
3
2
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
26
9
17
12
8
77
87
02
New Jersey
New York
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
102
79
8
0
108
83
9
1
189
11
201
03 District of Columbia
Delaware
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
0
18
7
94
19
5
0
1
2
4
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
10
98
22
5
143
10
154
04
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
10
48
11
18
2
21
22
11
2
4
2
0
0
1
1
3
0
3
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
55
13
19
2
23
24
14
143
13
162
05
Illinois
Indiana
Michigan
Minnesota
Ohio
Wisconsin
33
32
77
39
30
40
4
0
0
2
3
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
37
33
77
42
33
40
251
262
21
-------
National Priorities List,
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region)
October 1992
Reg State/Territory
Final
Gen Fed
Proposed
Gen Fed
page 2
Total
06
Arkansas
Louisiana
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Texas
12
11
7
9
25
0
1
2
1
3
12
12
11
10
29
64
74
07
Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska
19
9
20
7
21
10
23
10
55
64
08
Colorado
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Utah
Wyoming
13
8
2
2
8
2
3
0
0
1
4
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
8
2
4
13
3
35
47
09 American Samoa
Arizona
California
Commonwealth of Marianas
Guam
Hawaii
Nevada
Trust Territories
0
7
69
0
1
0
1
0
0
3
21
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
95
0
2
2
1
0
78
27
110
10
Alaska
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
2
7
8
33
4
2
1
15
7
9
9
50
50
22
75
Total
1085
123
25
1236
22
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
Date/Citation/Number of Sites
Date
October 23, 1981
115 ("Interim Priorities List")1
July 23, 1982
45 ("Expanded Eligibility List")1
December 30, 1982 (47 FR 58476)
418 (proposal of first NPL, including 153 of 160 sites
announced previously)
March 4, 1983 (48 FR 9311)
1 (proposal of Times Beach, Missouri)
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658)
406 (promulgation of first NPL; 1 proposed site split into 2
sites; 1 site deleted; 6 proposed sites dropped; 7 sites remain
proposed)
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40674)
133 (Proposed Rule #1)
May 8, 1984 (49 FR 19480)
4 (promulgation of 4 San Gabriel Valley Sites in California,
part of Proposed Rule #1)
September 21, 1984 (49 FR 37070)
128 (promulgation of 123 Proposed Rule #1 sites and 5 from
original proposal; 4 proposed sites dropped)
October 15, 1984 (49 FR 40320)
244, including 36 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #2)
February 14, 1985 (50 FR 6320)
2 (promulgation of Glen Ridge and Montclair/West Orange
Radium Sites in New Jersey, part of Proposed Rule #2)
April 10, 1985 (50 FR 14115)
32, including 6 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #3)
September 16, 1985 (50 FR 37630)
1 (promulgation of Lansdowne Radiation Site in Pennsylvania,
part of Proposed Rule #3)
September 18, 1985 (50 FR 37950)
41, including 3 Federal facility sites and one reproposed site
(Proposed Rule #4)
Number of Sites
Final
406
410
538
538
540
540
541
541
Proposed
115
160
418
419
140
136
4
248
246
278
277
318
Total
115
160
418
419
546
546
542
786
786
818
818
859
23
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21054)
170 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1-4; 8 sites
deleted)
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21099)
45, including 2 Federal Facility sites (Proposed Rule #5)
June 10, 1986(51 FR21109)
proposed RCRA policy; reopening of comment period for
5 sites
January 22, 1987 (52 FR 2492)
64, including 1 Federal facility site (Proposed Rule #6)
February 25, 1987 (52 FR 5578)
Availability of information
May 13, 1987 (52 FR 17991)
proposed RCRA policy for Federal facility sites
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27620)
99 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-6)
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27643)
7 (reproposal of Federal facility sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978)
43 (reproposal of RCRA sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23988)
229, including 14 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #7)
August 9, 1988 (53 FR 30002/30005)
RCRA policy statements
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10512)
(8 Federal facility sites)
and
March 31, 1989 (54 FR 13296)
101 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7;
4 proposed sites dropped)
May 5, 1989 (54 FR 19526)
10 (Proposed Rule #8)
July 14, 1989 (54 FR 29820)
52 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #9)
Number of Sites
Final
703
703
802
7993
890'
890
8893
Proposed
185
248:
149
378
273
283
335
Total
888
951
951
1,177
1,163
1,173
1,224
24
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
August 16, 1989 (54 FR 33846)
2 (proposal of ATSDR sites)
October 4, 1989 (54 FR 41000/41015)
93 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-8; 31
proposed sites dropped)
October 26, 1989 (54 FR 43778)
25, including 2 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #10, last
proposed rule under original HRS)
November 21, 1989 (54 FR 48184)
29 (promulgation of 27 Federal facility sites from Proposed
Rule #9 and 2 ATSDR sites; expansion of 1 Federal facility
site)
February 21, 1990 (55 FR 6154)
71 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7, 9;
1 proposed site dropped)
March 14, 1990 (55 FR 9688)
1 (promulgation of United Heckathorn Co., Richmond,
California, part of Proposed Rule #10)
August 30, 1990 (55 FR 35502)
106 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-10; 10
proposed sites dropped)
February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5598)
6 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-7, 10;
14 proposed sites dropped) (last final rule under original HRS)
May 9, 1991 (56 FR 21460)
1 (proposal of ATSDR site)
July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840)
22 (Proposed Rule #11, first proposed rule under revised HRS)
September 25, 1991 (56 FR 48438)
1 (promulgation of ATSDR site)
February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824)
30 (Proposed Rule #12)
October 1992
33 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1 1 and 12);
first final rule under revised HRS
October 1992
9 (Proposed Rule #13)
Number of Sites
Final
889
9813
981
1,010
1,081
1,082
1.1873
1.1893
1.1883
1,188
1.1853
1.1833
1.2084
Proposed
337
213
238
209
137
136
20
0
1
23
22
52
28
Total
1,226
1,194
1,219
1,219
1,218
1,218
1,207
1,189
1,189
1,211
1,207
1,235
1,236
1 No Federal Register notice.
- Silver Creek Tailings, Park City, UT, removed October 17, 1986 as required by CERCLA Section 118(p).
3 Reflects sites deleted since last rule.
4 Reflects sites removed since last rule.
25
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
For further information, call the Superfund Hotline, toll-free
1-SOO-424-9346 or (703) 920-9810 in Washington, DC
metropolitan area, or the U.S. EPA Superfund Regional Offices
listed below.*
For publications, contact
Public Information Center, PM-211B
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
(202) 260-2080
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, OS-5204G
United States Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
(703) 603-9027 or (703) 603-8858
Region 1
Connecticut
Maine
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont
Waste Management Division, HAA-CAN-1
John F. Kennedy Federal Building
Boston, MA 02203-2211
(617) 573-5707
Region 2
New Jersey
New York
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
Emergency and Remedial Response Division
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
(212) 264-8672
Region 3
Delaware
District of Columbia
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
Site Assessment Section, 3HW73
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
(215) 597-8229
Region 4
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Waste' Management Division
345 Courtland Street ME
Atlanta, GA 30365
(404)347-5065
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
Region 5
Illinois
Indiana
Michigan
Minnesota
Ohio
Wisconsin
Waste Management Division
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 6th Floor
Chicago, IL 60604
(312)353-9419
Region 6
Arkansas
Louisiana
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Texas
Hazardous Waste Management Division, 6H-M
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 76202-2733
(214) 655-6740
Region 7
Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska
Waste Management Division
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101
(913) 551-7062 or 551-7595
Region 8
Colorado
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Utah
.Wyoming.
Hazardous Waste Management Division, 8HWM-SR
999 18th Street, Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202-2466
(303) 294-7630
Region 9
American Samoa
Arizona
California
Guam
Hawaii
Nevada
Northern Marianas
Trust Territories
Waste Management Division, H-l
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 744-1730
Region 10
Alaska
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
Hazardous Waste Division, HW-113
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
(206) 553-1677
# All EPA telephone and telecommunications systems may be
accessed via the Federal Telecommunications System (FTS).
------- |