United States Offjce of Publication 9320.7-051
Environmental Protection Solid Waste and June 1993
Agency Emergency Response
Supplementary Materials:
National Priorities List,
Proposed Rule
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response Intermittent Bulletin
Hazardous Site Evaluation Division (5204G)
Volume 3, Number 2
The National Priorities List (NPL) informs the sive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
public of uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended by the
warrant further investigation to determine if they pose Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
risks to human health or the environment. Such sites 1986 (SARA). In October 1990, CERCLA was
are eligible for long-term "remedial action" financed extended to September 30, 1994. The U.S.
under the Trust Fund established by the Comprehen- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the
Table of Contents
How Sites Are Placed on the NPL 2
Statutory Requirements and Listing Policies 3
NPL Status (June 1993) 4
How Sites Are Deleted From the NPL 5
Key Dates In Superfund 6
Removing Proposed Site 7
Lists and Data Summaries 8
Federal Facilities Section (by State) 9
Proposed Sites (by State) 14
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL 17
NPL Sites Per State/Territory (by Total Sites) 22
NPL Sites Per EPA Region 23
Federal Register Notices 25
-------
primary responsibility for managing the Superfund
program.
HOW SITES ARE PLACED
ON THE NPL
EPA uses informal rulemaking to place sites on
the NPL. Sites are first proposed to the NPL in the
Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments
on the sites (typically for 60 days), responds to the
comments, and finally places on the NPL those sites
that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Section 300.425(c) of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), the Federal regulation by which CERCLA is
implemented (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990), provides
three mechanisms for placing sites on the NPL. The
primary mechanism is EPA's Hazard Ranking System
(HRS). The original HRS, developed in 1982,
evaluated the relative threat a site posed to human
health or the environment over five "pathways," or
routes of exposure. The HRS score was based on the
evaluation of three pathways through which
contaminants can migrate: ground water, surface
water, and air. The other two pathways, direct
contact and fire/explosion, were evaluated to
determine the need for immediate removal
(emergency) action. HRS scores ranged from 0 to
100. An HRS score of 28.50 was selected as the
cutoff point for the first proposed NPL to identify at
least 400 sites, the minimum suggested by CERCLA.
On December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532), EPA
revised the HRS, as required by SARA. The revised
HRS became effective on March 14, 1991. It is a
more comprehensive and accurate scoring system
than the original HRS and may add new types of sites
to the NPL.
The revised HRS retains the same cutoff score
and basic approach as the original HRS, while
incorporating SARA requirements as well as
improvements identified as necessary by EPA and the
public. The revised HRS retains the ground water,
surface water, and air pathways, drops the direct
contact and fire/explosion pathways, and adds a
fourth pathway, soil exposure. All four can be used
to calculate the site score.
The second mechanism for placing sites on the
NPL allows States or Territories to designate one top-
priority site regardless of score. Of the 57 States and
Territories, 38 have designated top-priority sites. Six
of these sites have been deleted from the NPL
because no further response was necessary.
The third mechanism allows listing a site if it
meets all three of these requirements:
« The Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR) of the U.S.
Public Health Service has issued a health
advisory that recommends removing people
from the site.
• EPA determines the site poses a significant
threat to public health.
• EPA anticipates it will be more cost-
effective to use its remedial authority
(available only at NPL sites) than to use its
emergency removal authority to respond to
the site.
Six sites have been proposed to the NPL on the
basis of ATSDR advisories:
• Four are on the NPL: Forest Glen Mobile
Home Subdivision, Niagara Falls, NY, and
Radium Chemical Co., Inc., New York
City, NY (54 FR 48184, November 21,
1989); White Chemical Corp., Newark NJ
(56 FR 48438, September 25, 1991); and
Austin Avenue Radiation Site, Delaware
County, PA (57 FR 47181, October 14,
1992).
• One, Lansdowne Radiation Site, Lansdowne,
PA has been deleted from the NPL because
all appropriate response has been completed
(56 FR 46121, September 10, 1991).
» One, Quail Run Mobile Manor, Gray
Summit, MO, was proposed on September
8, 1983 (48 FR 40674) but was dropped
from further consideration on February 11,
1991 (56 FR 5598). Because of an EPA
removal action, ATSDR had rescinded its
health advisory.
-------
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
AND LISTING POLICIES
CERCLA restricts EPA's authority to respond to
certain sites by expressly excluding some
substances — petroleum, for example — from the
definition of "release." In addition, as a matter of
policy, EPA may choose not to use CERCLA
because the Federal government can undertake or
enforce cleanup under other laws, thus preserving
CERCLA funds for sites not covered by other laws.
EPA has chosen not to use CERCLA for certain
types of sites regulated by Subtitle C of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). However,
if EPA later determines that sites not listed as a
matter of policy are not being properly responded to,
it may consider placing them on the NPL.
RCRA-Related Sites
When the first final NPL was promulgated in
September 1983, EPA announced certain listing
policies relating to sites that might qualify for the
NPL. One of these policies involved facilities subject
to RCRA Subtitle C. EPA's policy was generally not
to place on the NPL, RCRA "regulated units" (for
example, land disposal units that received hazardous
waste after the effective date of the RCRA land
disposal regulations) bemuse EPA can require the
owner/operator to clean up under RCRA. The
RCRA cleanup process and standards are similar to
those under CERCLA, ensuring that all actions taken
will protect human health and the environment.
In November 1984, the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments (HSWA) to RCRA were enacted,
expanding EPA's authority to require corrective
measures under Subtitle C. As a result of this
broadened RCRA authority, EPA revised its policy
for placing non-Federal RCRA-regulated sites on the
NPL, and on June 10, 1986 (54 FR 21057)
announced that facilities subject to RCRA Subtitle C
corrective action authorities would be placed on the
NPL if one or more of these conditions exists:
• The facilities are owned by persons who
have demonstrated an inability to finance
appropriate corrective action by invoking
bankruptcy laws.
• The facilities have lost authorization to
operate (also known as the Loss of Interim
Status, or LOIS provision), and there are
additional indications that the owner or
operator is unwilling to undertake
corrective action.
• The facilities have not lost authorization to
operate but have a clear history of
unwillingness to undertake corrective action.
These situations are determined on a case-
by-case basis.
On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978) and October 9,
1989 (54 FR 41000), EPA announced additional
components of the NPL/RCRA policy. As a matter
of policy, EPA will list four additional categories of
RCRA-related sites:
• Facilities that were treating, storing, or
disposing of Subtitle C hazardous waste after
November 19, 1980, but that did not file a
"Part A," the initial part of the permit
application, by that date as required and
have little or no history of compliance with
RCRA. EPA believes that these non- or
late filers, although they are technically
subject to RCRA, are not likely to be
cleaned up expeditiously under RCRA and
so should be on the NPL. However, if such
facilities have complied with RCRA, EPA
may consider whether listing is necessary.
• Facilities with permits for the treatment,
storage, or disposal of hazardous waste
issued before enactment of HSWA, and
whose owners/operators will not voluntarily
modify the permit. Pre-HSWA permittees
are not required to take corrective action for
releases. Under RCRA Section 3004(u),
EPA does not have the authority to modify
a pre-HSWA permit for corrective action
until the permit is reissued. Many pre-
HSWA permits are for 10 years. Since the
last pre-HSWA permit was issued prior to
November 8, 1984, it could be 1994 before
EPA could modify some permits to include
corrective action. In these cases, EPA
believes CERCLA authorities will result in
the most expeditious cleanup.
-------
NPL Status (June 1993)
Sites on final NPL
o General Superfund Section
o Federal Facilities Section
Sites remaining on proposed NPL
o General Superfund Section
o Federal Facilities Section
Construction Completion List
States dropped from proposed NPL
o Policy issues (e.g., RCRA)
o MRS score below 28.50
•All but 1 in General Superfund Section
(1,076)
(123)
(51)
(20)
1,199
1,270
71
161
(43)
(33)
9 Facilities that filed a Part A permit application
for treatment, storage, or disposal of Subtitle C
hazardous waste as a precaiui«uufv measure
only. Such facilities -- for example,
generators, transporters, or recyclers of
hazardous waste — are not subject to Subtitle C
corrective action authorities. These are
referred to as protective filers.
• Facilities that at one time treated or stored
Subtitle C hazardous waste but have since
converted to generator-only status (i.e.,
facilities that now store hazardous waste for 90
days or less) or any other hazardous waste
activity not requiring Interim Status. These
facilities, whose Part A permit applications
have been withdrawn with EPA or State
approval, are referred to as converters. EPA
believes it has the authority under RCRA
Section 3008(u) to compel corrective action at
such facilities. However, RCRA's corrective
action program currently focuses primarily on
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (due
to permitting deadlines in RCRA). Therefore,
this category should be on the NPL to ensure
expeditious cleanup. However, if a consent
order requiring remedial action is in effect, a
converter need not be listed.
Federal Facility Sites
CERCLA Section 120(a) requires that Federal
facilities be subject to and comply with CERCLA in
the same manner as any nongovernmental entity.
CERCLA Section lll(e)(3), however, generally
prohibits use of the Trust Fund for remedial actions
at Federally owned facilities. Thus, Federal agencies
must use their own funds for cleanup. Federal sites
are listed in a separate section of Appendix B, rather
than in the General Superfund Section.
Because most Federal facilities have RCRA-
regulated units within their boundaries, EPA
determined that a separate NPL/RCRA policy should
be adopted for Federal facilities. As a result, on
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10520), EPA announced it
would place on the NPL those sites located on
Federally owned or operated facilities that meet the
NPL eligibility requirements -- e.g., HRS scores of
28.50 or greater ~ even if the Federal facility also is
-------
subject to the corrective action authorities of RCRA
Subtitle C. Cleanup, if appropriate, could then
proceed at those sites under either CERCLA or
RCRA. The policy is based on several
considerations:
• Congress clearly intended that Federal facility
sites should be on the NPL.
• Strict application of the non-Federal
NPL/RCRA policy would exclude virtually all
Federal facility sites from the NPL because
they would not likely meet any of the criteria
necessary for listing (inability to pay as
evidenced by invocation of bankruptcy laws or
demonstrated unwillingness to comply with
RCRA).
• Placing RCRA-regulated Federal sites on the
NPL serves the primary purpose of listing
Federal facility sites to advise the public of the
status of Federal government cleanup efforts.
• Listing these sites helps Federal agencies set
priorities and focus cleanup efforts on those
sites that present the most serious problem.
Radioactive Release Sites
CERCLA Section 101(22) excludes several types
of releases of radioactive materials from the statutory
definition of "release." These releases are therefore
not eligible for CERCLA response actions or the
NPL. The exclusions apply to (1) releases of source,
by-product, or special nuclear material from a nuclear
incident if these releases are subject to financial
protection requirements under Section 170 of the
Atomic Energy Act and (2) any releases of source,
by-product, or special nuclear material from any
processing site designated under the Uranium Mill
Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978.
Accordingly, such radioactive releases have not been
considered eligible for the NPL.
As a policy matter, EPA has also chosen not to
list releases of source, by-product, or special nuclear
material from any facility with a current license
issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC), on the grounds that NRC has full authority to
require cleanup of releases from such facilities. EPA
will, however, list releases from facilities that hold a
current license issued by a State pursuant to an
agreement between the State and the NRC under
Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act. Facilities
whose licenses are no longer in effect are also
considered for listing.
HOW SITES ARE DELETED
FROM THE NPL
EPA may delete a final NPL site if it determines
that no further response is required to protect human
health or the environment. Under Section 300.425(e)
of the NCP (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990.) a site may
be deleted where no further response is appropriate if
EPA determines that one of the following criteria has
been met:
• EPA, in conjunction with the State, has
determined that responsible or other parties
have implemented all appropriate response
action required.
• EPA, in consultation with the State, has
determined that all appropriate Superfund-
fmanced response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and that no further response by
responsible parties is appropriate.
• A remedial investigation has shown that the
release poses no significant threat to public
health or the environment, and, therefore
remedial measures are not appropriate.
Since 1986, EPA has followed these procedures
for deleting a site from the NPL:
• The Regional Administrator approves a "close-
out report" which establishes that all
appropriate response action has been taken or
that no action is required.
• The Regional Office obtains State concurrence.
• EPA publishes a notice of intent to delete in
the Federal Register and in a major newspaper
near the community involved. A public
comment period is provided.
• EPA responds to the comments and, if the site
continues to warrant deletion, publishes a
deletion notice in the Federal Register.
Sites that have been deleted from the NPL remain
eligible for further Superfund-financed remedial
action in the unlikely event that conditions in the
future warrant such action.
As of June 1993, 50 sites have been deleted from
the NPL, all in the General Superfund Section.
-------
Legislation
o Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) enacted December 11, 1980; Trust Fund of $1.6 billion
authorized over 5 years
o CERCLA amended by Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
(SARA) enacted October 17, 1986; Trust Fund of $8.5 billion authorized
over 5 years
o CERCLA extended to September 30, 1994; an additional $5.1 billion
authorized
Federal regulation implementing Superfund: National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP)
o Revised July 16, 1982 (47FR 31180) to incorporate CERCLA requirements
o Revised March 8, 1990 (55 FR 8666) in response to CERCLA Section 105,
amended by SARA
Hazard Ranking System
o Promulgated July 16, 1982 (47 FR 31180) as Appendix A of the NCP
o Revised December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532) in response to CERCLA
Section 105(c), added by SARA; effective date March 14, 1991
National Priorities List
o Promulgated September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658) as Appendix B of the NCP
o Must be updated at least annually
o Last sites proposed under original MRS promulgated February 11, 1991 (56
FR 5598); Construction Completion category activated (56 FR 5634)
o First sites proposed under revised MRS July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840)
o First sites added to NPL under revised MRS October 14, 1992 (57 FR
47181)
o Construction Completion List activated March 2, 1993 (58 FR 12142)
-------
REMOVING PROPOSED SITES
As of June 1993, 79 sites (see page 17) have been
proposed for the NPL but subsequently removed from
further consideration, most of them because their
final HRS scores were below the 28.50 cutoff or they
are subject to RCRA Subtitle C. Three of the sites
were reproposed on February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824)
after being rescored with the revised HRS.
-------
LISTS AND DATA SUMMARIES
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
June 1993
Date
St
AK
AK
AK
AK
AK
AK
AL
AL
AL
AZ
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
CO
Site Name
Adak Naval Air Station
Eielson Air Force Base
Elmendorf Air Force Base
Fort Richardson (US Army)
Fort Uainwright
Standard Steel&Metals Salvage Yard(USDOT
4 Final + 2 Proposed = 6
Alabama Army Ammunition Plant
Anniston Army Depot (SE Industrial Area)
Redstone Arsenal (US Army/NASA)
2 Final + 1 Proposed = 3
Luke Air Force Base
Williams Air Force Base
Yuma Marine Corps Air Station
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
Barstow Marine Corps Logistics Base
Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base
Castle Air Force Base
Concord Naval Weapons Station
Edwards Air Force Base
El Toro Marine Corps Air Station
Fort Ord
George Air Force Base
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA)
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (Site 300)
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (USDOE)
March Air Force Base
Mather Air Force Base
HcClellan Air Force Base (GU Contam)
Moffett Naval Air Station
Norton Air Force Base
Riverbank Army Ammunition Plant
Sacramento Army Depot
Sharpe Army Depot
Tracy Defense Depot
Travis Air Force Base
Treasure Island Naval Station-Hun Pt An
21 Final + 1 Proposed = 22
Air Force Plant PJKS
Rocky Flats Plant (USDOE)
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
City/County
Adak
Fairbanks N Star Bor
Greater Anchorage Bo
Anchorage
Fairbanks N Star Bor
Anchorage
Childersburg
Anniston
Huntsville
Glendale
Chandler
Yuma
Barstow
San Diego County
Merced
Concord
Kern County
El Toro
Marina
Victorville
Pasadena
Livermore
Livermore
Riverside
Sacramento
Sacramento
Sunnyvale
San Bernardino
Riverbank
Sacramento
Lathrop
Tracy
Solano County
San Francisco
Waterloo
Golden
Adams County
Proposed
10/92
07/89
07/89
05/93
07/89
07/89
10/84
10/84
05/93
07/89
07/89
06/88
07/89
07/89
10/84
02/92
07/89
06/88
07/89
07/89
02/92
07/89
10/84
07/89
10/84
10/84
04/85
10/84
06/88
10/84
10/84
07/89
07/89
07/89
07/89
10/84
10/84
Final
11/89
08/90
08/90
08/90
07/87
03/89
08/90
11/89
02/90
11/89
11/89
07/87
08/90
02/90
02/90
02/90
10/92
08/90
07/87
11/89
07/87
07/87
07/87
07/87
02/90
07/87
07/87
08/90
11/89
11/89
11/89
10/89
07/87
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
CT New London Submarine Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
DE Dover Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
FL Cecil Field Naval Air Station
FL Homestead Air Force Base
New London
Dover
Jacksonville
'Homestead
10/89 08/90
10/84 03/89
07/89
07/89
11/89
08/90
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
June 1993
st
FL
FL
GA
GA
GU
HI
HI
IA
10
ID
IL
IL
IL
IL
KS
KY
LA
HA
HA
HA
HA
HA
HA
HA
HA
HO
HO
HO
Site Name
Jacksonville Naval Air Station
Pensacola Naval Air Station
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
Marine Corps Logistics Base
Robins Air Force" Base(Lf#4/Sludge lagoon
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Andersen Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Pearl Harbor Naval Complex
Schofield Barracks
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Iowa Army Anrounition Plant
1 Final «• 0 Proposed = 1
Idaho National Engineering Lab (USOOE)
Mountain Home Air Force Base
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Joliet Army Anmunition Plant (LAP Area)
Joliet Army Anmunition Plant (Hfg Area)
Sangomo Electric/Crab Orchard NUR (USDOI
Savanna Army Depot Activity
4 Final + 0 Prcposed = 4
Fort Riley
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USOOE)
0 Final + 1 Proposed = 1
Louisiana Army Anmunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Fort Devens
Fort Devens-Sudbury Training Annex
Hanscom Air Force Base
Materials Technology Laboratory(US Army)
Natick Laboratory Army Research, D&E Cntr
Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant
Otis Air National Guard /Camp Edwards
South Ueymouth Naval Air Station
3 Final + 5 Proposed = 8
Aberdeen Proving Ground (Edgewood Area)
Aberdeen Proving Ground(Hichaelsvi lie LF
Beltsville Agricultural Research (USDA)
City/County
Jacksonville
Pensacola
Albany
Houston County
Yigo
Pearl Harbor
Oahu
Hiddletown
Idaho Falls
Mountain Home
Joliet
Joliet
Carterville
Savanna
Junction City
Paducah
Doyline
Fort Devens
Middlesex County
Bedford
Water-town
Natick
Bedford
Falmouth
Weymouth
Edgewood
Aberdeen
Beltsville
Dal
Proposed
07/89
07/89
07/89
10/84
02/92
07/91
07/89
07/89
07/89
07/89
04/85
10/84
10/84
10/84
07/89
05/93
10/84
07/89
07/89
05/93
05/93
05/93
05/93
07/89
05/93
04/85
04/85
05/93
:e
Final
11/89
11/89
11/89
07/87
10/92
10/92
08/90
08/90
11/89
08/90
03/89
07/87
07/87
03/89
08/90
03/89
11/89
02/90
11/89
02/90
10/89
2 Final + 1 Proposed = 3
10
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
June 1993
st
ME
ME
ME
MM
MN
MO
HO
MO
MC
NE
NH
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NM
NM
NY
NY
NY
NY
OH
OH
OH
OK
OR
OR
Site Name
Brunswick Naval Air Station
Loring Air Force Base
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
2 Final + 1 Proposed = 3
Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant
Twin Cities Air Force Base(SAR Landfill)
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Lake City Army Ammu. Plant (NW Lagoon)
Ueldon Spring Former Army Ordnance Works
We 1 don Spring Quarry/Plant/Pi tts(USDOE)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
Camp Lejeune Military Reservation
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Cornhusker Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Pease Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Federal Aviation Admin. Tech. CntrCUSDOT
Fort Dix (Landfill Site)
Naval Air Engineering Center
Naval Weapons Station Earle (Site A)
Picatinny Arsenal
W.R. Grace/Wayne Interim Storage (USOOE)
6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6
Cal West Metals (USSBA)
Lee Acres Landfill (USDOI)
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Brookhaven National Laboratory (USOOE)
Griffiss Air Force Base
Pittsburgh Air Force Base
Seneca Army Depot
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
Feed Materials Production Center (USDOE)
Mound Plant (USOOE)
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
Tinker Air Force(Soldier Cr/Bldg 300)
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Fremont Nat. Forest Uranium Mines (USDA)
Umatilla Army Depot (Lagoons)
City/County
Brunswick
Limestone
ICittery
Fridley
Minneapolis
Independence
St. Charles County
St. Charles County
Ons low County
Hall County
Portsmouth/Hew ing ton
Atlantic County
Pemberton Township
Lakehurst
Colts Neck
Rockaway Township
Wayne Township
Lemitar
Farmington
Upton
Rome
Pittsburgh
Romulus
Fernald
Miamisburg
Dayton
Oklahoma City
Lake County
Hermiston
Oat
Proposed
10/84
07/89
05/93
07/89
01/87
10/84
10/84
07/89
06/88
10/84
07/89
07/89
10/84
09/85
10/84
07/89
09/83
06/88
06/88
07/89
10/84
07/89
07/89
07/89
07/89
06/88
04/85
05/93
10/84
:e
Final
07/87
02/90
11/89
07/87
07/87
07/87
02/90
10/89
07/87
02/90
08/90
07/87
07/87
08/90
02/90
09/84
03/89
08/90
11/89
07/87
11/89
08/90
11/89
11/89
10/89
07/87
07/87
1 Final + 1 Proposed = 2
11
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
June 1993
St Site Nome
City/County
Date
Proposed Final
PA Letterkenny Army Depot (PDO Area)
PA Letterkenny Army Depot (SE Area)
PA Naval Air Development Center(S Areas)
PA Tobyhama Army Depot
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
PR Naval Security Group Activity
1 Final «• 0 Proposed = 1
RI Davisville Naval Construction Batt Cent
RI Newport Naval Education/Training Center
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
SC Savannah River Site (USDOE)
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
SO Ellsworth Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
TH Memphis Defense Depot
TN Milan Army Ammunition Plant
TN Oak Ridge Reservation (USDOE)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
TX Air Force Plant #4 (General Dynamics)
TX Lone Star Army Ammunition Plant
TX Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant
TX Pantex Plant (USDOE)
3 Final + 1 Proposed = 4
UT Hill Air Force Base
UT Monti cello Hill Tailings (USDOE)
UT Ogden Defense Depot
UT Tooele Army Depot (North Area)
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
VA Defense General Supply Center
VA Langley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr
VA Marine Corps Combat Development Command
VA Naval Surface Warfare - Dahlgren
VA Naval Weapons Station - Yorktown
3 Final + 2 Proposed = 5
WA Bangor Naval Submarine Base
WA Bangor Ordnance Disposal
WA Bonneville Power Admin Ross (USDOE)
WA Fairchild Air Force Base (4 Waste Areas)
WA Fort Lewis (Landfill No. 5)
WA Fort Lewis Logistics Center
WA Hamilton Island Landf UKUSA/COE)
WA Hanford 100-Area (USDOE)
WA Hanford 1100-Area (USDOE)
WA Hanford 200-Area (USDOE)
Franklin County
Chambersburg
War-minster Township
Tobyhanna
Sabana Seca
North Kingstown
Newport
Aiken
Rapid City
04/85 03/89
10/84 07/87
06/86 10/89
07/89 08/90
06/88 10/89
07/89
07/89
11/89
11/89
07/89 11/89
10/89 08/90
Memphis
Milan
Oak Ridge
Fort Worth
Texarkana
Karnack
Pantex Village
Ogden
Monti cello
Ogden
Tooele
Chesterfield County
Hampton
Quant i co
Dahlgren
Yorktown
Silverdale
Bremerton
Vancouver
Spokane County
Tacoma
Tillicum
North Bonneville
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
02/92
10/84
07/89
10/84
10/84
07/89
07/91
10/84
07/89
10/84
10/84
10/84
05/93
05/93
02/92
02/92
07/89
10/84
07/89
06/88
10/84
07/89
07/91
06/88
06/88
06/88
10/92
07/87
11/89
08/90
07/87
08/90
07/87
11/89
07/87
08/90
07/87
10/92
10/92
08/90
07/87
11/89
03/89
07/87
11/89
10/92
10/89
10/89
10/89
12
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
June 1993
St Site Name
City/County
Date
Proposed Final
UA Hanford 300-Area (USOOE)
UA Jackson Park Housing Complex (US Navy)
WA HcChord Air Force Base (Wash Rack/Treat)
UA Naval Air Station, Uhidbey Is (Seaplane)
UA Naval Air Station, Uhidbey Island (Ault)
UA Naval Undersea Warfare Station (4 Areas)
UA Port Hadlock Detachment (US Navy)
UA Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex
15 Final + 3 Proposed = 18
UV Allegany Ballistics Laboratory (US Navy)
0 Final + 1 Proposed = 1
UY F.E. Uarren Air Forca Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
123 Final + 20 Proposed = 143
Benton County
Kitsap County
Tacoma
Uhidbey Island
Uhidbey Island
Keyport
Indian Island
Bremerton
Mineral County
Cheyenne
10/89
07/87
02/90
02/90
10/89
06/88
05/93
10/84
09/85
09/85
06/86
05/93
05/93
05/93
07/89 02/90
13
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
June 1993
St
Site Name
Location
Notes'
a
AK Federal Facility Sites
Adak Naval Air Station
Fort Richardson (US Army)
0 General Superfund Sites + 2 Federal Facility Sites = 2
AL General Superfund Sites
Monarch Tile Manufacturing, Inc.
Federal Facility Sites
Redstone Arsenal (US Army/NASA)
1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2
CA General Superfund Sites
Cooper Drum Co.
Del Amo Facility
GBF, Inc., Dump
Stoker Company
Federal Facility Sites
Concord Naval Weapons Station
4 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 5
CO General Superfund Sites
ASARCO, Inc. (Globe Plant)
Smeltertown Site
Summitvilie Mine
3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3
FL General Superfund Sites
Broward County--21st Manor Dump
Plymouth Avenue Landfill
Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tampa Plant)
Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tarpons Springs)
4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4
HI General Superfund Sites
Del Monte Corp. (Oahu Plantation)
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
IA General Superfund Sites
Waterloo Coal Gasification Plant
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
ID General Superfund Sites
Blackbird Mine
Triumph Mine Tailings Piles
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
IN General Superfund Sites
U.S. Smelter & Lead Refinery Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
KY General Superfund Sites
National Southuire Aluminum Co.
Federal Facility Sites
Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USDOE)
1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2
HA General Superfund Sites
Blackburn & Union Privileges
Federal Facility Sites
Hanscom Air Force Base
Materials Technology Laboratory(US Army)
Natick Laboratory Army Research,D&E Cntr
Adak
Anchorage
Florence
Huntsville
South Gate
Los Angeles
Ant i och
Imperial
Concord
Denver
Salida
Rio Grande County
Fort Lauderdale
DeLand
Tampa
Tarpon Springs
Honolulu County
Waterloo
Lemhi County
Triumph
East Chicago
Hawesvilie
Paducah
Walpole
Bedford
Watertown
Natick
14
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
June 1993
St
Site Name
Location
Notes
a
Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant
South Weymouth Naval Air Station
1 General Superfund Sites + 5 Federal Facility Sites = 6
HO General Superfund Sites
Ordnance Products, Inc.
Spectron, Inc.
Federal Facility Sites
Beltsville Agricultural Research (USOA)
2 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 3
HE Federal Facility Sites
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
0 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 1
HN General Superfund Sites
Lake Elmo Airport /GU Contamination
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
HS General Superfund Sites
Chemfax, Inc.
Potter Co.
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
NC General Superfund Sites
General Electric Co/Shepherd Farm
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
NE General Superfund Sites
American Shizuki/Ogallala Electronics Co
Bruno Co-op Association/Associated Prop
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
NJ General Superfund Sites
Horseshoe Road
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
NH General Superfund Sites
AT&SF (Albuquerque)
Rinchem Co., Inc.
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
NY General Superfund Sites
Onondaga Lake
Pfohl Brothers Landfill
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
OH General Superfund Sites
Diamond Shamrock Corp(Painesvilie Works)
Dover Chemical Corp.
North Sanitary Landfill
3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3
OK General Superfund Sites
National Zinc Corp.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
OR General Superfund Sites
East Hultnomah County Ground Wtr Contam.
HcCormick & Baxter Creos. Co. (Portland)
Federal Facility Sites
Fremont Nat. Forest Uranium Hines (USDA)
2 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 3
Bedford
Weymouth
Cecil County
Cecil County
Beltsville
Kittery
Baytoun Township
Gulfport
Wesson
East Flat Rock
Ogallala
Bruno
Sayreville
Albuquerque
Albuquerque
Syracuse
Cheektowaga
Painesville
Dover
Dayton
Bartlesvilie
Hultnomah County
Portland
Lake County
15
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
June 1993
St
Site Home
Location
Motes
a
PA
SC
SO
TH
TX
UT
VA
VI
UA
WI
UV
General Superfund Sites
UGI Columbia Gas Plant
1 General Supcrfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites
Genera1. Superfund Sites
(Coppers Co., Inc. (Charleston Pint)
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites
1
General Superfund Sites
Annie Creek Mine Tailings
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
ICG Iselin Railroad Yard
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
ALCOA (Point Comfort)/Lavaca Bay
RSR Corp.
Federal Facility Sites
Pantex Plant (USDOE)
2 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 3
General Superfund Sites
Richardson Flat Tailings
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
Federal Facility Sites
Langley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr
Marine Corps Combat Development Command
0 General Superfund Sites + 2 Federal Facility Sites = 2
General Superfund Sites
Tutu Uellfield
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
Pacific Sound Resources
Spokane Junkyard and Associated Prop
Tulalip Landfill
Vancouver Water Station #1 Contamination
Federal Facility Sites
Jackson Park Housing Complex (US Navy)
Port Hadlock Detachment (US Navy)
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex
4 General Superfund Sites + 3 Federal Facility Sites = 7
General Superfund Sites
Ripon City Landfill
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
Federal Facility Sites
Allegany Ballistics Laboratory (US Navy)
0 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 1
51 General Superfund Sites + 20 Federal Facility Sites = 71
Columbia
Charleston
Lead
Jackson
Point Comfort
Dallas
Pantex Village
Summit County
Hampton
Quantico
Tutu
Seattle
Spokane County
Harysvilie
Vancouver
Kitsap County
Indian Island
Bremerton
Fond Du Lac County
Mineral County
A = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(if scored, MRS score need not be > 28.50).
S = State top priority (included among the 100 top priority sites regardless of score).
16
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
June 1993
Date
Removed
St
AR
AR
AR
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
DC
DE
Site Name
Allen Transformer
Crittenden County Landfill
Magnolia City Landfill
Kingman Airport Industrial Area
Mesa Area Ground Water Contamination
FHC Corp. (Fresno Plant)
Hewlett-Packard
IBM Corp. (San Jose Plant)
Kaiser Steel Corp.(Fontana Plant)
Kearney-KPF
Marley Cooling Tower Co.
Precision Monolithic, Inc.
Rhone-Poulenc, Inc./Zoecon Corp.
Signetics, Inc.
Solvent Service, Inc.
Southern Pacific Transportation
Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.
Martin-Marietta(Denver Aerospace)
USA Fort Lincoln Barrel Site
Old Brine Sludge Landfill
Location
Ft. Smith
Marion
Magnolia
Kingman
Mesa
Fresno
Palo Alto
San Jose
Font ana
Stockton
Stockton
Santa Clara
East Palo Alto
Sunnyvale
San Jose
Rosevtlle
San Jose
Waterton
Washington
Delaware City
Proposed
10/23/81
47FR 5S476
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/26/89
54FR 43778
12/30/82
47FR 58476
6/10/86
51FR 21099
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
6/24/88
53 FR 23988
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/23/81
9/08/83
48FR 40674
Score8
12/30/82°
09/08/83
47FR 40658
08/30/90
55FR 35502
09/21/84d
49FR 37070
06/10/86
51FR 21054
09/24/84
49FR 37070
Otherb
02/08/91
56FR 5598
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54 FR 41000
08/30/90
53FR 35502
10/04/89
54 FR 41000
10/04/89
54 FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
08/30/90
55FR 35502
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
12/30/82e
47FR 58476
17
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
June 1993
Date
Removed
St
DE
FL
FL
FL
GA
HI
HI
HI
HI
HI
HI
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
ID
IL
IL
IL
Site Home
Pigeon Point Landfill
Davidson L inter Co.
Hontco Research Products, Inc.
Pratt & Whitney Air/United Tech
01 in Corp. (Areas 1,2 & 4)
Kunia Wells I
Kunia Wells II
Hililani Wells
Waiaua Shaft
Waipahu Wells
Waipio Heights Wells II
A.Y. McDonald Industries, Inc.
Chemplex Co.
Frit Industries (Humboldt Plant)
John Deere (Dubuque Works)
U.S. Nameplate Co.
Flynn Lumber Co.
Sheffield (US Ecology, Inc.)
Stauffer Chetn (Chic Heights Pint)
Warner Electric Brake & Clutch Co
Location
New Castle
South Miami
Hollister
West Palm Beach
Augusta
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Dubuque
Clinton/Camanche
Humboldt
Dubuque
Mount Vernon
Caldwell
Sheffield
Chicago Heights
Roscoe
Proposed
1/22/87
52FR 2492
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/18/85
50FR 37950
9/08/83
48FR 40674
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
4/10/85
50FR 14115
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/15/84
49FR 40320
1/22/87
52FR 2492
6/24/88
53FR 23988
Score8
10/04/89
54FR 41015
06/10/86
51FR 21054
03/31/89
54FR 13296
09/08/83
48FR 40658
10/04/89
54FR 41015
Other6
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
02/08/91 f
56FR 5598
02/08/9 1f
56FR 5593
02/08/9 1f
56FR 5598
02/08/91 f
56FR 5598
02/08/91 f
56FR 5598
02/08/91 f
56FR 5598
10/04/89
54FR 41000
02/08/91
56FR 5598
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
08/30/90
55FR 35502
IS
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
June 1993
Date
Removed
St
IN
IN
IN
KS
HI
HI
MI
HI
HI
HI
HO
HO
HS
HS
HT
HT
NE
NE
NJ
NJ
Site Name
Firestone Industrial Products Co.
HcCarty's Bald Knob Landfill
Parrot Road Dump
National Industrial Environ Serv
E.I. du Pont (Montague Plant)
Ford Motor Co. (Sludge Lagoon)
Hooker (Montague Plant)
Lacks Industries, Inc.
Lenauee Disposal Service, Inc. Landfill
Littlefield Township Dump
Findett Corp.
Quail Run Mobile Manor
Gautier Oil Co., Inc.
Plastifax, Inc.
Burlington Northern(Somers Plant)
Comet Oil Co.
Monroe Auto Equipment Co.
Phillips Chemical Co.
Horstmann's Dump
Jame Fine Chemical
Location
Noblesville
Mt. vernon
New Haven
Fur ley
Montague
Ypsilanti
Montague
Grand Rapids
Adrian
Oden
St. Charles
Gray Summit
Gautier
Gulfport
Somers
Bi 1 1 ings
Cozad
Beatrice
East Hanover
Bound Brook
Proposed
9/18/85
50FR 37950
1/22/87
52FR 2492
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
1/22/87
52FR 2492
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/08/83
48FR 40674
6/24/88
53 FR 23988
7/23/82
10/15/84
49FR 40320
6/24/88
53 FR 23988
9/18/85
50FR 37950
12/30/82
47FR 58476
1/22/87
52FR 2492
10/15/84
49FR 40320
Score8
10/04/89
54FR 41015
09/08/83
48FR 40658
03/31/89
54FR 13296
08/30/90
55FR 35502
06/10/86
51FR 21054
09/21/84
49FR 37070
08/30/90
5FR 35502
09/08/83h
48FR 40658
02/08/91
56FR 5598
09/08/83
48FR 40658
03/31/89
54FR 13296
06/1 0/861
51FR 21054
Otherb
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54 FR 41000
02/08/91
56FR 5598
02/08/91 9
56FR 5598
02/08/91
56FR 5598
10/04/89
54FR 41000
19
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
June 1993
Date
Removed
St
NJ
OH
OK
OK
PA
PA
TX
TX
UT
UT
UT
VA
UA
UA
UI
UV
Site Nome
Hatlack, Inc.
General ElectricCCoshocton Plant)
Kerr-HcGee Corp. (Gushing Plant)
Sunray Oil Co. Refinery
Keyser Avenue Borehole
Rohm and Haas Co. Landfill
Pig Road
Rio Grande Oil Co. Refinery
Mayflower Mountain Tailings Pond
Olson/Neihart Reservoir
Silver Creek Tailings
IBM Corp. (Hanassas Plant Spill)
Quendall Terminal
Rosch Property
Fort Howard Paper Co. Lagoons
Mobay Chemical (New Martinsvi lie)
Location
Woolwich Township
Coshocton
Gushing
Allen
Scranton
Bristol Township
Mew Waver ly
Sour Lake
Wasatch County
Wasatch County
Park City
Manassas
Renton
Roy
Green Bay
New Hartinsvi lie
Proposed
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/26/89
54 FR 43778
6/24/88
53FR 23988
6/24/88
53 FR 23988
4/10/85
50FR 14115
9/08/83
48FR 40674
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/08/83
48FR 40674
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
Score8
02/08/91
56FR 5598
08/30/90
55FR 35502
02/21/90
55FR 6154
06/10/86
51FR 21054
08/30/90
55FR 35502
06/10/86
51FR 21054
03/31/89
54FR 13296
06/10/86
51FR 21054
09/21/84
49FR 37070
08/30/90
53FR 35502
Otherb
10/04/89
54 FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
1 0/1 7/86 J'
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
Number of sites removed: 76
"Final HRS score below 28.50.
Subject to RCRA Subtitle C, except as noted.
dOn Interim Priorities List announced October 23, 1981; removed at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476, December 30, 1982).
Contamination occurs naturally
(Footnotes continue on the next page.)
20
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
June 1993
Date
Removed
St Site Name Location Proposed Score8 Other
C0n Interim Priorities List announced October 23, 1981; removed at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476, December 30, 1982),
^a Federal facility site an so ineligible at the time.
Pending development of EPA pesticide policy.
?No longer meets health advisory issued by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
;0n Expanded Eligibility List announced July 23, 1982; removed at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476, December 30, 1982) because
JRemoved per SARA Section 118(p)
NOTE: The following four sites were proposed, removed, and then reproposed. In this case, the site has been listed:
• Van Dale Junkyard, Marietta, OH, proposed December 30, 1982 (47FR 58476); removed September 8, 1983 (48FR
40658); reproposed October 15, 1984 (49FR 40320); listed June 10, 1986 (51FR 21054).
These three sites have been reproposed under the revised HRS:
• Concord Naval Weapons Station, Concord, CA: proposed June 24, 1988 (53FR 23988); removed August 30, 1990 (55FR
35502); reproposed February 7, 1992 (57FR 4824).
• GBF, Inc., Antioch, CA: proposed June 24, 1988 (53FR 23988); removed October 4, 1989 (54FR 41015); reproposed
February 7, 1992 (57FR 4824).
• Richardson Flat Tailings, Summit County, UT: proposed June 24, 1988 (53FR 23988); removed February 11, 1991
(56FR 5598); reproposed February 7, 1992 (57FR 4824).
21
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites Per State/Territory
(by Total Sites)
June 1993
Final
Proposed
State/Territory
New Jersey
Pennsylvania
California
New York
Michigan
Florida
Washington
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Illinois
Ohio
Indiana
Massachusetts
Texas
South Carolina
Virginia
Missouri
North Carolina
Iowa
Kentucky
Delaware
Colorado
New Hampshire
Connecticut
Tennessee
Alabama
Georgia
Utah
Arkansas
Louisiana
Maryland
Oregon
Rhode Island
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Arizona
Idaho
Kansas
Maine
Nebraska
Puerto Rico
Alaska
Montana
Vermont
West Virginia
Mississippi
South Dakota
Hawaii
Wyoming
Guam
North Dakota
Nevada
Virgin Islands
American Samoa
Commonwealth of Marianas
District of Columbia
Trust Territories
Gen
102
94
69
79
76
47
33
38
39
33
30
32
22
24
22
19
20
20
18
18
18
12
16
14
11
10
11
8
12
11
7
8
10
7
9
7
6
9
7
7
8
2
8
8
5
2
2
0
2
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
Fed
6
4
21
4
0
4
15
2
0
4
3
0
3
3
1
3
3
1
1
0
1
3
1
1
3
2
2
4
0
1
2
1
2
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
1
4
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Gen
1
1
4
2
0
4
4
1
1
0
3
1
1
2
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
3
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
2
2
0
2
1
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Fed
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
109
99
95
85
76
55
55
41
40
37
36
33
31
30
24
24
23
22
20
20
19
18
17
15
15
14
13
13
12
12
12
12
12
11
11
'0
10
10
10
10
9
8
8
8
6
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
Total
1076
123
51
20 1270
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region)
June 1993
Final
Reg
1
2
3
4
5
6
State/T>>rritory
Connecticut
Massachusetts
Maine
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont
New Jersey
New York
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
District of Columbia
Delaware
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
Illinois
Indiana
Michigan
Minnesota
Ohio
Wisconsin
Arkansas
Louisiana
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Texas
Gen
14
22
7
16
10
8
77
102
79
8
0
189
0
18
7
94
19
5
143
10
47
11
18
2
20
22
11
141
33
32
76
38
30
39
248
12
11
7
9
24
Fed
1
3
2
1
2
0
9
6
4
1
0
11
0
1
2
4
3
0
10
2
4
2
0
0
1
1
3
13
4
0
0
2
3
0
9
0
1
2
1
3
Proposed
Gen
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
1
4
0
0
2
1
0
0
3
1
4
0
1
2
1
1
1
11
0
1
0
1
3
1
6
0
0
2
1
2
Fed
0
5
1
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
1
4
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Total
15
31
10
17
12
8
93
109
85
9
1
204
0
19
12
99
24
6
160
14
55
13
20
4
22
24
15
167
37
33
76
41
36
40
263
12
12
11
11
30
63
76
23
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region)
June 1993
Final
Reg
7
8
9
10
State/Territory
Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska
Colorado
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Utah
Wyoming
Commonwealth of Marianas
American Samoa
Arizona
California
Guam
Hawaii
Nevada
Trust Territories
Alaska
Idaho
Oregc":
Washington
Gen
18
9
20
7
54
12
8
2
2
8
2
34
0
0
7
69
1
0
1
0
78
2
6
8
33
Fed
1
1
3
1
6
3
0
0
1
4
1
9
0
0
3
21
1
2
0
0
27
4
2
1
15
Proposed
Get
1
0
0
2
3
3
0
0
1
1
0
5
0
0
0
4
0
1
0
0
5
0
2
2
4
Fed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
1
3
Total
20
10
23
10
63
18
8
2
4
13
3
48
0
0
10
95
2
3
1
0
111
8
10
12
55
49
22
85
Total
1076 123
51
20
1270
24
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER
NOTICES
Date/Citation/Number of
Sites
Date
October 23, 1981
115 ("Interim Priorities List")1
July 23, 1982
45 ("Expanded Eligibility List")1
December 30, 1982 (47 FR 58476)
418 (proposal of first NPL, including 153 of 160 sites
announced previously)
March 4, 1983 (48 FR 9311)
1 (proposal of Times Beach, Missouri)
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658)
406 (promulgation of first NPL; 1 proposed site split into 2
sites; 1 site deleted; 6 proposed sites dropped; 7 sites remain
proposed)
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40674)
133 (Proposed Rule #1)
May 8, 1984 (49 FR 19480)
4 (promulgation of 4 San Gabriel Valley Sites in California,
part of Proposed Rule #1)
September 21, 1984 (49 FR 37070)
128 (promulgation of 123 Proposed Rule #1 sites and 5 from
original proposal; 4 proposed sites dropped)
October 15, 1984 (49 FR 40320)
244, including 36 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #2)
February 14, 1985 (50 FR 6320)
2 (promulgation of Glen Ridge and Montclair/West Orange
Radium Sites in New Jersey, part of Proposed Rule #2)
April 10, 1985 (50 FR 14115)
32, including 6 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #3)
September 16, 1985 (50 FR 37630)
1 (promulgation of Lansdowne Radiation Site in Pennsylvania,
part of Proposed Rule #3)
September 18, 1985 (50 FR 37950)
41, including 3 Federal facility sites and one reproposed site
(Proposed Rule #4)
Number of Sites
Final
406
410
538
538
540
540
541
541
Proposed
115
160
418
419
140
136
4
248
246
278
277
318
Total
115
160
418
419
546
546
542
786
786
818
818
859
25
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21054)
170 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1-4; 8 sites
deleted)
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21099)
45, including 2 Federal Facility sites (Proposed Rule #5)
June 10, 1986(51 FR21109)
proposed RCRA policy; reopening of comment period for
5 sites
January 22, 1987 (52 FR 2492)
64, including 1 Federal facility site (Proposed Rule #6)
February 25, 1987 (52 FR 5578)
Availability of information
May 13, 1987 (52 FR 17991)
proposed RCRA policy for Federal facility sites
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27620)
99 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-6)
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27643)
7 (reproposal of Federal facility sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978)
43 (reproposal of RCRA sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23988)
229, including 14 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #7)
August 9, 1988 (53 FR 30002/30005)
RCRA policy statements
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10512)
(8 Federal facility sites)
and
March 31, 1989 (54 FR 13296)
101 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7;
4 proposed sites dropped)
May 5, 1989 (54 FR 19526)
10 (Proposed Rule #8)
July 14, 1989 (54 FR 29820)
52 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #9
August 16, 1989 (54 FR 33846)
2 (proposal of ATSDR sites)
Number of Sites
Final
703
703
802
7993
8903
890
8893
889
Proposed
185
2482
149
378
273
283
335
337
Total
888
951
951
1,177
1,163
1,173
1,224
1.226 I
26
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
October 4, 1989 (54 FR 41000/41015)
93 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-8; 31
proposed sites dropped)
October 26, 1989 (54 FR 43778)
25, including 2 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #10, last
proposed rule under original HRS)
November 21, 1989 (54 FR 48184)
29 (promulgation of 27 Federal facility sites from Proposed
Rule #9 and 2 ATSDR sites; expansion of 1 Federal facility
site)
February 21, 1990 (55 FR 6154)
71 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7, 9;
1 proposed site dropped)
March 14, 1990 (55 FR 9688)
1 (promulgation of United Heckathorn Co., Richmond,
California, part of Proposed Rule #10)
August 30, 1990 (55 FR 35502)
106 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-10; 10
proposed sites dropped)
February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5598)
6 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-7, 10;
14 proposed sites dropped) (last final rule under original HRS)
May 9, 1991 (56 FR 2 1460)
1 (proposal of ATSDR site)
July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840)
22 (Proposed Rule #11, first proposed rule under revised HRS)
September 25, 1991 (56 FR 48438)
1 (promulgation of ATSDR site)
February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824)
30 (Proposed Rule #12)
October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47181)
33 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #11 and 12);
first final rule under revised HRS
October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47204)
9 (Proposed Rule #13)
May 10, 1993 (58 FR 27507)
26 (Proposed Rule #14)
Number of Sites
Final
9813
981
1,010
1,081
1,082
1.1873
1.1893
1.1883
1,188
1,1853
1.1833
1.2083'4
1.2023-4
Proposed
213
238
209
137
136
20
0
1
23
22
52
28
54
Total
1,194
1,219
1,219
1,218
1,218
1,207
1,189
1,189
1,211
1,207
1,235
1,236
1,256
27
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
June 1993
17 (Proposed Rule #15)
Number of Sites
Final
1.1993-4
Proposed
71
Total
1,270
'No Federal Register notice.
:Silver Creek Tailings, Park City, UT, removed October 17, 1986 as required by CERCLA Section 118(p).
'Reflects site(s) deleted since last rule.
'Reflects site(s) removed since last rule.
28
------- |