United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Offjce of
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
Publication 9320.7-051
February 1995
vxEPASupplementary Materials:
National Priorities List,
Proposed Rule
Office of Emergency and Remedial Respons
Hazardous Site Evaluation Division (5204G)
ionse
Intermittent Bulletin
Volume 5, Number 1
The National Priorities List (NPL) informs the
public of uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that warrant
further investigation to determine if they pose risks to
human health or the environment. Such sites are
eligible for long-term "remedial action" financed under
the Trust Fund established by the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended by the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA).
In October 1990, CERCLA was extended to September
30, 1994. An appropriation by Congress for Fiscal Year
1995 authorized Superfund to continue to operate. The
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the
primary responsibility for managing the Superfund
program.
Table of Contents
How Sites Are Placed on the NPL 2
Statutory Requirements and Listing Policies 3
NPL Status (February 1995) 4
How Sites Are Deleted From the NPL 5
Removing Proposed Sites 5
Key Dates In Superfund 6
Lists and Data Summaries 7
Federal Facilities Section (by State) 8
Proposed Sites (by State) . 13
Sites Deleted From NPL 16
NPL Sites Per State/Territory (by New Proposed Sites) 19
NPL Sites Per EPA Region 20
Federal Register Notices . 22
-------
HOW SITES ARE PLACED
ON THE NPL
EPA uses informal rulemaking to place sites on the
NPL. Sites are first proposed to the NPL in the Federal
Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the
sites (typically for 60 days), responds to the comments,
and finally places on the NPL those sites that continue to
meet the requirements for listing.
Section 300.425(c) of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), the Federal regulation by which CERCLA is
implemented (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990), provides
three mechanisms for placing sites on the NPL. The
primary mechanism is EPA's Hazard Ranking System
(HRS). The original HRS, developed in 1982, evaluated
the relative threat a site posed to human health or the
environment over five "pathways," or routes of
exposure. The HRS score was based on the evaluation
of three pathways through which contaminants can
migrate: ground water, surface water, and air. The
other two pathways, direct contact and fire/explosion,
were evaluated to determine the need for i
removal (emergency) action. HRS scores ranged from
0 to 100. An HRS score of 28.50 was selected as the
cutoff point for the first proposed NPL to identify at
least 400 sites, the minimum suggested by CERCLA.
On December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532), EPA
revised the HRS, as required by SARA. The revised
HRS became effective on March 14, 1991. It is a more
comprehensive and accurate scoring system than the
original HRS and may add new types of sites to the
NPL.
The revised HRS retains the same cutoff score and
basic approach as the original HRS, while incorporating
SARA requirements as well as improvements identified
as necessary by EPA and the public. The revised HRS
retains the ground water, surface water, and ah*
pathways, drops the direct contact and fire/explosion
pathways, and adds a fourth pathway, soil exposure. All
four can be used to calculate the site score.
The second mechanism for placing sites on the NPL
allows States or Territories to designate one top-priority
site regardless of score. Of the 57 States and
Territories, 39 have designated top-priority sites. Six of
these sites have been deleted from the NPL because no
further response was necessary.
The third mechanism allows listing a site if it meets
all three of these requirements:
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry (ATSDR) of the U.S. Public Health
Service has issued a health advisory that
recommends removing people from the site.
EPA determines the site poses a significant
threat to public health.
EPA anticipates it will be more cost-effective
to use its remedial authority (available only at
NPL sites) than to use its emergency removal
authority to respond to the site.
Nine sites have been proposed to the NPL on the
basis of ATSDR advisories:
Two are proposed to the NPL: Tennessee
Products, Chattanooga, TN; and Raymark
Industries, Inc., Stratford, CT.
Five are on the NPL: Forest Glen Mobile
Home Subdivision, Niagara Falls, NY, and
Radium Chemical Co., Inc., New York City,
NY (54 FR 48184, November 21, 1989);
White Chemical Corp., Newark NJ (56 FR
48438, September 25, 1991); Austin Avenue
Radiation Site, Delaware County, PA (57 FR
47181, October 14, 1992); and Lower Ecorse
Creek Dump, Wyandotte, MI (59 FR 27989,
May 31, 1994).
One, Lansdowne Radiation Site, Lansdowne,
PA has been deleted because all appropriate
response has been completed (56 FR 46121,
September 10, 1991).
One, Quail Run Mobile Manor, Gray Summit,
MO (48 FR 40674, September 8, 1983) was
dropped from further consideration on
February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5598). Because of
an EPA removal action, ATSDR had rescinded
its health advisory.
-------
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
AND LISTING POLICIES
CERCLA restricts EPA's authority to respond to
certain sites by expressly excluding some substances -
- petroleum, for example - from the definition of
"release." In addition, as a matter of policy, EPA may
choose not to use CERCLA because the Federal
government can undertake or enforce cleanup under
other laws, thus preserving CERCLA funds for sites
not covered by other laws. EPA has chosen not to use
CERCLA for certain types of sites regulated by Subtitle
C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC). However, if EPA later determines that sites not
listed as a matter of policy are not being properly
responded to, it may consider placing them on the NPL.
RCRA-Rdated Sites
When the first final NPL was promulgated in
September 1983, EPA announced certain listing policies
relating to sites that might qualify for the NPL. One of
these policies involved facilities subject to RCRA Subtitle
C. EPA's policy was generally not to place on the
NPL, RCRA "regulated units" (for example, land
disposal units that received hazardous waste after the
effective date of the RCRA land disposal regulations)
because EPA can require the owner/operator to clean up
under RCRA. The RCRA cleanup process and
standards are similar to those under CERCLA, ensuring
that all actions taken will protect human health and the
environment.
In November 1984, the Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments (HSWA) to RCRA were enacted,
expanding EPA's authority to require corrective
measures under Subtitle C. As a result of this broadened
RCRA authority, EPA revised its policy for placing non-
Federal RCRA-regulated sites on the NPL, and on June
10,1986 (54 FR 21057) announced that facilities subject
to RCRA Subtitle C corrective action authorities would
be placed on the NPL if one or more of these conditions
exists:
The facilities are owned by persons who have
demonstrated an inability to finance appropriate
corrective action by invoking bankruptcy laws.
The facilities have lost authorization to operate
(also known as the Loss of Interim Status, or
LOIS provision), and there are additional
indications that the owner or operator is
unwilling to undertake corrective action.
The facilities have not lost authorization to
operate but have a clear history of
unwillingness to undertake corrective action.
These situations are determined on a case-by-
case basis.
On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978) and October 9,
1989 (54 FR 41000), EPA announced additional
components of the NPL/RCRA policy. As a matter of
policy, EPA will list four additional categories of
RCRA-related sites:
Facilities that were treating, storing, or
disposing of Subtitle C hazardous waste after
November 19, 1980, but that did not file a
"Part A," the initial part of the permit
application, by that date as required and have
little or no history of compliance with RCRA.
EPA believes that these non- or late filers,
although they are technically subject to RCRA,
are not likely to be cleaned up expeditiously
under RCRA and so should be on the NPL.
However, if such facilities have complied with
RCRA, EPA may consider whether listing is
necessary.
Facilities with permits for the treatment,
storage, or disposal of hazardous waste issued
before enactment of HSWA, and whose
~ owners/operators will not voluntarily modify
the permit. Pre-HSWA permittees are not
required to take corrective action for releases.
Under RCRA Section 3004(u), EPA does not
have the authority to modify a pre-HSWA
permit for corrective action until the permit is
reissued.
Facilities that filed a Part A permit application
for treatment, storage, or disposal of Subtitle C
hazardous waste as a precautionary measure
only. Such facilities - for example,
generators, transporters, or recyclers of
hazardous waste - are not subject to Subtitle C
corrective action authorities. These are
referred to as protective filers.
-------
NPL Status (February 1995)
Number of Sites on Final NPL
Total: 1,241
General Superfund Section: 1,087
Federal Facilities Section: 154
Number of Sites Remaining on Proposed NPL
Total: 55
General Superfund Section: 47
Federal Facilities Section: 8
Total Number of Final and Proposed Sites
1,296
Number of Sites on the Construction Completion List
282
Number of Sites Deleted from Final NPL
68
Facilities that at one time treated or stored
Subtitle C hazardous waste but have since
converted to generator-only status Q.e.,
facilities that now store hazardous waste for 90
days or less) or any other hazardous waste
activity not requiring Interim Status. These
facilities, whose Part A permit applications
have been withdrawn with EPA or State
approval, are referred to as converters. EPA
believes it has the authority under RCRA
Section 3008(u) to compel corrective action at
such facilities. However, RCRA's corrective
action program currently focuses primarily on
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (due
to permitting deadlines in RCRA). Therefore,
this category should be on the NPL to ensure
expeditious cleanup. However, if a consent
order requiring remedial action is in effect, a
converter need not be listed.
Federal FactDty Sites
CERCLA Section 120(a) requires that Federal
facilities be subject to and comply with CERCLA in the
same manner as any nongovernmental entity. CERCLA
Section lll(eX3), however, generally prohibits use of
the Trust Fund for remedial actions at Federally owned
facilities. Thus, Federal agencies must use their own
funds for cleanup. Federal sites are listed in a separate
section of Appendix B, rather than in the General
Superfund Section.
Because most Federal facilities have RCRA-
regulated units within their boundaries, EPA determined
that a separate NPL/RCRA policy should be adopted for
Federal faculties. As a result, on March 13, 1989 (54
FR 10520), EPA announced it would place on the NPL
those sites located on Federally owned or operated
facilities that meet the NPL eligibility requirements -
e.g., HRS scores of 28.50 or greater - even if the
Federal facility also is subject to the corrective action
authorities of RCRA Subtitle C. Cleanup, if
appropriate, could then proceed at those sites under
either CERCLA or RCRA. The policy is based on
several considerations:
Congress clearly intended that Federal facility
sites should be on the NPL.
Strict application of the non-Federal
NPL/RCRA policy would exclude virtually all
Federal facility sites from the NPL because
they would not likely meet any of the criteria
necessary for listing (inability to pay as
evidenced by invocation of bankruptcy laws or
demonstrated unwillingness to comply with
RCRA).
-------
Placing RCRA-regulated Federal sites on the
NPL serves the primary purpose of listing
Federal facility sites to advise the public of the.
status of Federal government cleanup efforts.
Listing these sites helps Federal agencies set
priorities and focus cleanup efforts on those
sites that present the most serious problem.
Radioactive Release Sites
CERCLA Section 101(22) excludes several types of
releases of radioactive materials from the statutory
definition of "release." These releases are therefore not
eligible for CERCLA response actions or the NPL. The
exclusions apply to (1) releases of source, by-product, or
special nuclear material from a nuclear incident if these
releases are subject to financial protection requirements
under Section 170 of the Atomic Energy Act and (2) any
releases of source, by-product, or special nuclear
material from any processing site designated under the
Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978.
Accordingly, such radioactive releases have not been
considered eligible for the NPL.
As a policy matter, EPA has also chosen not to list
releases of source, by-product, or special nuclear
material from any facility with a current license issued
by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRQ, on the
grounds that NRC has full authority to require cleanup
of releases from such facilities. EPA will, however, list
releases from facilities that hold a current license issued
by a State pursuant to an agreement between the State
and the NRC under Section 274 of the Atomic Energy
Act. Facilities whose licenses are no longer in effect are
also considered for listing.
HOW SITES ARE DELETED
FROM THE NPL
EPA may delete a final NPL site if it determines
that no further response is required to protect human
health or the environment. Under Section 300.425(e) of
the NCP (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990.) a site may be
deleted where no further response is appropriate if EPA
determines that one of the following criteria has been
met:
EPA, in conjunction with the State, has
determined that responsible or other parties
have implemented all appropriate response
action required.
EPA, in consultation with the State, has
determined that all appropriate Superfund-
financed response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and that no farther response by
responsible parties is appropriate.
A remedial investigation has shown that the
release poses no significant threat to public
health or the environment, and, therefore
remedial measures are not appropriate.
Since 1986, EPA has followed these procedures for
deleting a site from the NPL:
The Regional Administrator approves a "close-
out report" which establishes that all
appropriate response action has been taken or
that no action is required.
The Regional Office obtains State concurrence.
EPA publishes a notice of intent to delete in the
Federal Register and in a major newspaper
near the community involved. A public
comment period is provided.
EPA responds to the comments and, if the site
continues to warrant deletion, publishes a
deletion notice in the Federal Register.
Sites that have been deleted from the NPL remain
eligible for further Superfund-financed remedial action in
the unlikely event that conditions in the future warrant
such action.
As of February 1995, 68 sites have been deleted
from the NPL, all but two in the General Superfund
Section.
REMOVING PROPOSED SITES
As of February 1995, 76 sites (see page 16) have
been proposed for the NPL but subsequently removed
from further consideration, most of them because their
final HRS scores were below the 28.50 cutoff or they
are subject to RCRA Subtitle C. Three of the sites were
reproposed on February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824) after
being rescored with the revised HRS.
-------
Key Dates in Superfund
Legislation
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) enacted December 11,1980; Trust Fund of $1.6 billion authorized
over 5 years
CERCLA amended by Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
(SARA) enacted October 17,1986; Trust Fund of $8.5 billion authorized over
5 years
CERCLA extended to September 30, 1994; an additional $5.1 billion
authorized
Federal regulation implementing Superfund: National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP)
Revised July 16,1982 (47 FR 31180) to incorporate CERCLA requirements
Revised March 8, 1990 (55 FR 8666) in response to CERCLA Section 105,
amended by SARA
Hazard Ranking System
Promulgated July 16,1982 (47 FR 31180) as Appendix A of the NCP
Revised December 14,1990 (55 FR 51532) in response to CERCLA Section
105(c), added by SARA; effective date March 14,1991
National Priorities List
Promulgated September 8,1983 (48 FR 40658) as Appendix B of the NCP
Must be updated at least annually
Last sites proposed under original HRS promulgated February 11,1991 (56
FR 5598); Construction Completion category activated (56 FR 5634)
First sites proposed under revised HRS July 29,1991 (56 FR 35840)
First sites added to NPL under revised HRS October 14,1992 (57 FR 47181)
Construction Completion List activated March 2,1993 (58 FR 12142)
-------
LISTS AND DATA SUMMARIES
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
February 1995
St Site Name
City/County
Date
Proposed Final
AK Adak Naval Air Station
AK Eielson Air Force Base
AK Elmendorf Air Force Base
AK Fort Richardson (USARHY)
AK Fort Wainwright
AK Standard Steel&Metals Salvage Yard(USDOT
6 Final * 0 Proposed = 6
AL Alabama Army Ammunition Plant
AL Amiston Army Depot (SE Industrial Area)
AL Redstone Arsenal (USARMY/NASA)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
AZ Luke Air Force Base
AZ Williams Air Force Base
AZ Yuma Marine Corps Air Station
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
CA Barstow Marine Corps Logistics Base
CA Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base
CA Castle Air Force Base
CA Concord Naval Weapons Station
CA Edwards Air Force Base
CA El Toro Marine Corps Air Station
CA Fort Ord
CA George Air Force Base
CA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA)
CA LEHR/Old Campus Landfill (USOOE)
CA Lawrence Livermore Lab Site 300 (USOOE)
CA Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (USOOE)
CA March Air Force Base
CA Mather Air Force Base
CA HcClellan Air Force Base (GU Conta»)
CA Moffett Naval Air Station
CA Norton Air Force Base
CA Rivet-bank Army Ammunition Plant
CA Sacramento Army Depot
CA Sharpe Army Depot
CA Tracy Defense Depot (USARMY)
CA Travis Air Force Base
CA Treasure Island Naval Station-Hun Pt An
23 Final + 0 Proposed = 23
CO Air Force Plant PJKS
CO Rocky Flats Plant (USOOE)
CO Rocky Mountain Arsenal (USARMY)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
CT New London Submarine Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed * 1
DE Dover Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed » 1
Adak
Fairbanks N Star Boro
Greater Anchorage Bor
Anchorage
Fairbanks N Star Boro
Anchorage
Childersburg
Amiston
Huntsville
Glendale
Chandler
Yuma
Barstow
San Diego County
Merced
Concord
Kern County
El Toro
Marina
Victorville
Pasadena
Davis
Livemore
Livermore
Riverside
Sacramento
Sacramento
Sunnyvale
San Bernardino
Riverbank
Sacramento
Lathrop
Tracy
Solano County
San Francisco
Waterton
Golden
Adams County
New London
Dover
10/92
07/89
07/89
06/93
07/89
07/89
10/84
10/84
06/93
07/89
07/89
06/88
07/89
07/89
10/84
02/92
07/89
06/88
07/89
07/89
02/92
01/94
07/89
10/84
07/89
10/84
10/84
04/85
10/84
06/88
10/84
10/84
07/89
07/89
07/89
07/89
10/84
10/84
05/94
11/89
08/90
05/94
08/90
08/90
07/87
03/89
05/94
08/90
11/89
02/90
11/89
11/89
07/87
12/94
08/90
02/90
02/90
02/90
10/92
05/94
08/90
07/87
11/89
07/87
07/87
07/87
07/87
02/90
07/87
07/87
08/90
11/89
11/89
11/89
10/89
07/87
10/89 08/90
10/84 03/89
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
February 1995
Date
St
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA
GU
HI
HI
HI
IA
ID
10
IL
IL
IL
IL
KS
KS
ICY
LA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
Site Name
Cecil Field Naval Air Station
Homestead Air Force Base
Jacksonville Naval Air Station
Pensacola Naval Air Station
Uhiting Field Naval Air Station
5 Final + 0 Proposed = 5
Marine Corps Logistics Base
Robins Air Force Base(Lf*4/Sludge lagoon
2 Final + 0 Proposed - 2
Andersen Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Naval Computer I Telecomunications Area
Pearl Harbor Naval Complex
Schofield Barracks (USARMY)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
Iowa Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed » 1
Idaho National Engineering Lab (USOOE)
Mountain Home Air Force Base
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (LAP Area)
Joliet Army Annum" t ion Plant (Mfg Area)
Sangamo Electric/Crab Orchard NWR (USOOI
Savanna Army Depot Activity
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
Fort Riley
Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 1 Proposed = 2
Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USOOE)
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Louisiana. Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Fort Devens
Fort Devens- Sudbury Training Annex
Hanscom Field/Hanscom Air Force Base
Materials Technology Laboratory (USARMY)
Natick Laboratory Amy Research, DIE Cntr
Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant
Otis Air National Guard (USAF)
South Weymouth Naval Air Station
City/County
Jacksonville
Homestead
Jacksonville
Pensacola
Milton
Albany
Houston County
Yigo
Oahu
Pearl Harbor
Oahu
Middletown
Idaho Falls
Mountain Home
Joliet
Joliet
Carterville
Savanna
Junction City
DeSoto
Paducah
Doyline
Fort Devens
Middlesex County
Bedford
Uatertown
Natick
Bedford
Falmouth
Weymouth
Proposed
07/89
07/89
07/89
07/89
01/94
07/89
10/84
02/92
01/94
07/91
07/89
07/89
07/89
07/89
04/85
10/84
10/84
10/84
07/89
02/95
05/93
10/84
07/89
07/89
05/93
06/93
05/93
06/93
07/89
06/93
Final
11/89
08/90
11/89
11/89
05/94
11/89
07/87
10/92
05/94
10/92
08/90
08/90
11/89
08/90
03/89
07/87
07/87
03/89
08/90
05/94
03/89
11/89
02/90
05/94
05/94
05/94
05/94
11/89
05/94
8 Final + 0 Proposed * 8
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
February 1995
st
HO
HO
HO
HO
HO
HE
HE
HE
HI
HN
MN
HN
Ufl
MO
HO
HO
NC
NC
NE
NH
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
MM
NH
NY
NY
NY
Site Name
Aberdeen Proving Ground (Edgewood Area)
Aberdeen Proving Ground(Michaelsville LF
Beltsville Agricultural Research (USOA)
Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center
Patuxent River Naval Air Station
4 Final + 1 Proposed * 5
Brunswick Naval Air Station
Loring Air Force Base
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
Wurtsmith Air Force Base
0 Final * 1 Proposed = 1
Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant
New Brighton/Arden Hills/TCAAP (USARNY)
Twin Cities Air Force Base(SAR Landfill)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
t alrA f*{*u a . AfiMM I Dl *> f Ml 1 1 AM««^*M\
Lake city Army Afimu. riant (NW Lagoon)
Weldon Spring Former Army Ordnance Works
Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pitts(USOOE>
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
Camp Lejeune Military Res. (USHAVY)
Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Cornhusker Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Pease Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Federal Aviation Admin. Tech. Center
Fort Dix (Landfill Site)
Naval Air Engineering Center
Naval Weapons Station Earle (Site A)
Pica tinny Arsenal (USARNY)
W.R. Grace/Wayne Interim Storage (USOOE)
6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6
Cat West Metals (USSBA)
Lee Acres Landfill (USOOI)
2 Final + 0 Proposed * 2
Brookhaven National Laboratory (USOOE)
Griffiss Air Force Base
Plattsburgh Air Force Bast
City/County
Edgewood
Aberdeen
Beltsville
Indian Head
St. Mary's County
Brunswick
Limestone
Kittery
losco County
Fridley
New Brighton
Minneapolis
St. Charles County
St. Charles County
Ons low County
Have lock
Hall County
PortsMouth/Newi ngton
Atlantic County
Pemberton Township
Lakehurst
Colts Neck
Rockaway Township
Wayne Township
Lean tar
Fanni ngton
Upton
Rome
Plattsburgh
Oat
Proposed
04/85
04/85
05/93
02/95
01/94
10/84
07/89
06/93
01/94
07/89
12/82
01/87
fl/a£
lU/O*
07/89
10/84
06/88
08/94
10/84
07/89
07/89
10/84
09/85
10/84
07/89
09/83
06/88
06/88
07/89
10/84
07/89
:e
Final
02/90
10/89
05/94
05/94
07/87
02/90
05/94
11/89
09/83
07/87
f\f IfTf
Ur /of
02/90
07/87
10/89
12/94
07/87
02/90
08/90
07/87
07/87
08/90
02/90
09/84
03/89
08/90
11/89
07/87
11/89
10
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
February 1995
st
NY
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OK
OR
OR
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PR
RI
RI
SC
sc
so
TN
TM
TN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
Site Name
Seneca Army Depot
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
Air Force Plant 85
Feed Materials Production Center (USOOE)
Mound Plant (USDOE)
Rickenbacker Air National Guard (USAF)
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
3 Final + 2 Proposed = 5
Tinker Air Force(Soldier Cr/Bldg 300)
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Fremont Nat. Forest Uranium Nines (USOA)
Umatilla Army Depot (Lagoons)
1 Final * 1 Proposed = 2
Letterkenny Army Depot (POO Area)
Letterkenny Army Depot (SE Area)
Naval Air Development Center(8 Areas)
Navy Ships Parts Control Center
Tobyhanna Army Depot
Willow Grove Naval Air 1 Air Res. Stn.
5 Final + 1 Proposed = 6
Naval Security Group Activity
1 Final « 0 Proposed * 1
Davisville Naval Construction Batt Cent
Newport Naval Education/Training Center
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Parr is Island Marine Corps Recruit Depot
Savannah River Site (USOOE)
2 Final * 0 Proposed = 2
Ellsworth Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Arnold Engineering Develop. Ctr. (USAF)
Memphis Defense Depot (DLA)
Milan Army Ammunition Plant
Oak Ridge Reservation (USOOE)
3 Final + 1 Proposed * 4
Air Force Plant #4 (General Dynamics)
Lone Star Army Amount t ion Plant
Longhorn Array Ammunition Plant
Pantex Plant (USDOE)
City/County
Romulus
Columbus
Fernald
Miamisburg
Lockbourne
Dayton
Oklahoma City
Lake County
Henri ston
Franklin County
Chambersburg
Warminster Township
Mechanicsburg
Tobyhanna
Willow Grove
Sabana Seca
North Kingston
Newport
Parris Island
Aiken
Rapid City
Tul lahoma/Manchester
Memphis
Milan
Oak Ridge
Fort Worth
Texarkana
Karnack
Pantex Village
Oat
Proposed
07/89
01/94
07/89
07/89
01/94
06/88
04/85
06/93
10/84
04/85
10/84
06/86
01/94
07/89
08/94
06/88
07/89
07/89
08/94
07/89
10/89
08/94
02/92
10/84
07/89
10/84
10/84
07/89
07/91
e
Final
08/90
11/89
11/89
10/89
07/87
07/87
03/89
07/87
10/89
05/94
08/90
10/89
11/89
11/89
12/94
11/89
08/90
10/92
07/87
11/89
08/90
07/87
08/90
05/94
4 Final + 0 Proposed « 4
11
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
February 1995
St Site Nam
City/County
Date
Proposed Final
UT Hill Air Force Base
UT Monti cello Mill Tailings (USDOE)
UT Ogden Defense Depot (OLA)
UT Tooele Army Depot (North Area)
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
VA Defense General Supply Center (DLA)
.VA Fort Eustis (US Army)
VA Langley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr
VA Marine Corps Combat Development Comnand
VA Naval Surface Warfare - Dahlgren
VA Naval Weapons Station -Yorktown
6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6
WA American Lake Gardens/McChord AFB
WA Bangor Naval Submarine Base
WA Bangor Ordnance Disposal (USNAVY)
WA Bormeville Power Admin Ross (USDOE)
WA Fairchild Air Force Base (4 Waste Areas)
WA Fort Lewis (Landfill No. 5)
WA Fort Lewis Logistics Center
WA Hamilton Island Landfill(USA/COE)
WA Hanford 100-Area (USDOE)
WA Hanford 1100-Area (USDOE)
WA Hanford 200-Area (USDOE)
WA Hanford 300-Area (USDOE)
WA Jackson Park Housing Complex (USNAVY)
WA McChord Air Force Base (Wash Rack/Treat)
WA Naval Air Station, Whidbey Is (Seaplane)
WA Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island (Ault)
WA Naval Undersea Warfare Station (4 Areas)
WA Old Navy Dump/Manchester Lab(USEPA/NOAA)
WA Port Hadlock Detachment (USNAVY)
WA Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex
'20 Final + 0 Proposed = 20
WV Allegany Ballistics Laboratory (USNAVY)
WV West Virginia Ordnance (USARMY)
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
WY F.E. Warren Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
154 Final + 8 Proposed = 162
Ogden 10/84 07/87
Monti cello 07/89 11/89
Ogden 10/84 07/87
Tooele 10/84 08/90
Chesterfield County 10/84 07/87
Newport News 01/94 12/94
Hampton 05/93 05/94
Quantico 05/93 05/94
Dahlgren 02/92 10/92
Yorktown 02/92 10/92
Tacoma
Silverdale
Bremerton
Vancouver
Spokane County
Tacoma
Tillicum
North Bormeville
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Kitsap County
Tacoma
Whidbey Island
Whidbey Island
Keyport
Manchester
Indian Island
Bremerton
09/83
07/89
10/84
07/89
06/88
10/84
07/89
07/91
06/88
06/88
06/88
06/88
06/93
10/84
09/85
09/85
06/86
01/94
06/93
05/93
09/84
08/90
07/87
11/89
03/89
07/87
11/89
10/92
10/89
10/89
10/89
10/89
05/94
07/87
02/90
02/90
10/89
05/94
05/94
05/94
Mineral
Point Pleasant
Cheyenne
06/93
12/82
05/94
09/83
07/89 02/90
12
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
February 1995
St
Site Name
Location
Motes"
XL General Superfund Sites
Monarch Tile Manufacturing, Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
CA General Superfund Sites
Cooper Drum Co.
Del Aroo Facility
GBF, Inc., Dump
Stoker Company
4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4
co General Superfund Sites
ASARCO, Inc. (Globe Plant)
Smeltertown Site
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
CT General Superfund Sites
Raymark Industries, Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
TL General Superfund Sites
Brouard County--21st Manor Dunp
Normandy Park Apartnents
Plymouth Avenue Landfill
Stauffer Chenical Co. (Tanpa Plant)
4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4
IA General Superfund Sites
Waterloo Coal Gasification Plant
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
ID General Superfund Sites
Blackbird Mine
Triumph Mine Tailings Piles
2 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
ix General Superfund Sites
U.S. Smelter t Lead Refinery inc.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
rs General Superfund Sites
Ace Services
Federal Facility Sites
Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant
1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2
LA General Superfund Sites
Gulf State Utilities-North Ryan Street
Lincoln Creosote
Old Citgo Refinery (Bossier City)
Southern Shipbuilding
4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4
XD General Superfund Sites
Ordnance Products, Inc.
Federal Facility Sites
Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center
1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2
MI General Superfund Sites
West Site/Hows Corners
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
Florence
South Gate
Los Angeles
Antioch
Imperial
Denver
Salida
Stratford
Fort Lauderdale
Teaple Terrace
DeLand
Tampa
Waterloo
Lemhi County
Triumph
East Chicago
Colby
DeSoto
Lake Charles
Bossier City
Bossier
Slidell
Cecil County
Indian Head
Plymouth
13
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
February 1995
St
Site Name
Location
Notes
a
MI General Superfund Sites
Bay City Middlegrounds
Federal Facility Sites
Wurtsmith Air Force Base
1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2
MS General Superfund Sites
Chemfax, Inc.
Potter Co.
Texas Eastern Kosciusko Compressor Stn.
3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3
MT General Superfund Sites
Burlington Northern Livingston Complex
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
KB General Superfund Sites
Bruno Co-op Association/Associated Prop
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites » 1
MJ General Superfund Sites
Horseshoe Road
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
xx General Superfund Sites
Rinchem Co., Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites 1
OH General Superfund Sites
Diamond Shamrock Corp(Painesville Works)
Dover Chemical Corp.
Federal Facility Sites
Air Force Plant 85
Rickenbacker Air National Guard (USAF)
2 General Superfund Sites + 2 Federal Facility Sites > 4
or General Superfund Sites
National Zinc Corp.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility sites * 1
OR General Superfund Sites
East Multnomah County Ground Wtr Contain.
Federal Facility Sites
Fremont Nat. Forest Uranium Mines (USDA)
1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2
FA General Superfund Sites
East Tenth Street
Federal Facility Sites
Willow Grove Naval Air & Air Res. Stn.
1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites * 2
SD General Superfund Sites
Annie Creek Mine Tailings
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites * 1
TM General Superfund Sites
Tennessee Products
Federal Facility Sites
Arnold Engineering Develop. Ctr. (USAF)
1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites * 2
Bay City
losco County
Gulfport
Wesson
Kosciusko
Livingston
Bruno
Sayreville
Albuquerque
Painesvilte
Dover
Colmfcus
Lockbourne
Bartlesvilie
Multnonah County
Lake County
Marcus Hook
Willow Grove
Lead
Chattanooga A
Tul lahcM/Manchester
14
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
February 1995
St
Site Name
Location
Notes"
TX General Superfund Sites
RSR Corp. . Dallas
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
or General Superfund Sites
Kemecott (North Zone) Magna
Kennecott (South Zone) Copperton
Hurray Smelter Murray City
Richardson Flat Tailings Suntnit County
4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4
vz General Superfund Sites
Island Chemical Corp/V.I. Chemical Corp St. Croix
Tutu Wellfield Tutu
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
NA General Superfund Sites
Boomsnub/Airco Vancouver
Tulalip Landfill Marysville
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
47 General Superfund Sites + & Federal Facility Sites = 55
aA = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(if scored, MRS score need not be > 28.50).
S = State top priority (included among the 100 top priority sites regardless of score).
15
-------
Sites Deleted from the NPL
February 1995
st
AL
AR
AS
AZ
CA
CM
CO
CT
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
IA
IA
10
IL
IN
IN
IN
KS
KS
KS
MA
MO
MO
MI
MI
MI
MI
Site Name
Mowbray Engineering Co.
Cecil Lindsey
Taputimu Farm
Mountain View Mobile Home Estates
Jibboom Junkyard
PCS Warehouse
Uoodbury Chemical Co.
Revere Textile Prints Corp.
New Castle Steel
Parramore Surplus
Pioneer Sand Co.
Tri-City Oil Conservationist, Inc
Varsol Spill
Luminous Processes, Inc.
Aidex Corp.
LaBounty Site
Arrcom (Drexler Enterprises)
Petersen Sand & Gravel
International Minerals (E. Plant)
Poer Farm
Wedzeb Enterprises, Inc.
Big River Sand Co.
Hydro-Flex Inc.
Johns' Sludge Pond
Plymouth Harbor/Cannon Engineering Corp.
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc.
Middletown Road Dump
Charlevoix Municipal Well
Gratiot County Golf Course
Metal Working Shop
Whitehall Municipal Wells
Location
Greenville
Newport
Island of Tutila
Globe
Sacramento
Saipan
Commerce City
Sterling
New Castle County
Mount Pleasant
Warrington
Tampa
Miami
Athens
Council Bluffs
Charles City
Rathdrun
Libertyville
Terre Haute
Hancock County
Lebanon
Wichita
Topeka
Wichita
Plymouth
Baltimore
Annapolis
Charlevoix
St. Louis
Lake Ann
Whitehall
Date
Deleted
12/30/93
09/22/89
03/07/86
04/18/88
09/10/91
03/07/86
03/22/93
09/02/94
03/17/89
02/21/89
02/08/93
09/01/88
09/01/88
12/30/82
10/21/93
10/06/93
12/23/92
02/11/91
02/11/91
02/11/91
09/10/91
10/14/92
11/09/93
01/06/92
11/19/93
12/30/82
04/18/88
12/02/93
09/08/83
12/23/92
02/11/91
16
-------
Sites Deleted from the NPL
February 1995
st
MM
MN
HN
HO
MS
NC
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NM
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
OH
OR
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
TT
TX
Site Name
Adrian Municipal Well Field
Morris Arsenic Dump
Union Scrap Iron & Metal Co.
North-U Drive Well Contamination
Ualcotte Chemical Co. Warehouses
PCS Spills
Beachwood/Berkley Wells
Cooper Road
Friedman Property
Krysowaty Farm
M&T Delisa Landfill
Monroe Township Landfill
Ringwood Mines/Landfill
Pagano Salvage
BEC Trucking
BioClinical Laboratories, Inc.
C & J Disposal Leasing Co. Dump
Suffern Village Well Field
Wide Beach Development
Chemical & Minerals Reclamation
Allied Plating, Inc.
Enterprise Avenue
Lansdowne Radiation Site
Lehigh Electric t Engineering Co.
Presque Isle
Reeser's Landfill
Voortman Farm
Wade (ABM)
West line Site
PCS Wastes
Harris (Farley Street)
Location
Adrian
Morris
Minneapolis
Springfield
Greenville
243 Miles of Roads
Berkley Township
Voorhees Township
Upper Freehold Twp
Hillsborough
Asbury Park
Monroe Township
Ringwood Borough
Los Lunas
Town of Vestal
Bohemia
Hamilton
Village of Suffern
Brant
Cleveland
Portland
Philadelphia
Lansdowne
Old Forge Borough
Erie
Upper Macungie Twp
Upper Saucon Twp
Chester
West line
Pacific Trust Terr
Houston
Date
Deleted
12/30/92
03/07/86
09/10/91
09/08/94
12/30/82
03/07/86
01/06/92
02/22/89
03/07/86
02/22/89
03/21/91
05/01/94
11/02/94
10/14/92
10/14/92
10/11/94
09/20/94
05/28/93
08/30/94
12/30/82
11/14/94
03/07/86
09/10/91
03/07/86
02/13/89
05/31/90
05/31/89
03/23/89
10/14/92
03/07/86
04/18/88
17
-------
Sites Deleted from the MPL
February 1995
st
VA
VA
UA
WA
UA
UI
Site Name
Matthews Electroplating
Suffolk City Landfill
Pesticide Lab (Yakima)
Toftdahl Drums
Yakima Plating Co.
Waste Research & Reclamation Co.
Location
Roanoke County
Suffolk
Yakima
Brush Prairie
Yakima
Eau Claire
Date
Deleted
01/19/89
01/24/95
09/01/93
12/23/88
08/23/94
02/05/93
Number of sites deleted: 68
18
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites Per State/Territory
(by Proposed Rule #18)
February 1995
Proposed Rule 018
State/Territory
Louisiana
Kansas
Florida
Maine
Michigan
Maryland
Alabama
Alaska
American Samoa
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Commonwealth of Marianas
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Georgia
Guam
Hawai i
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
loua
Kentucky
Massachusetts
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Trust Territories
Utah
Vermont
Virgin Islands
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Gen
3
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Fed
0
1
0
0
0
1
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Proposed
Gen
4
1
4
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
4
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
3
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
4
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
Fed
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Gen
12
9
50
7
76
8
9
2
0
7
12
69
13
0
13
18
0
11
1
1
6
33
32
17
19
22
38
2
19
8
8
1
16
100
8
78
21
2
31
9
9
95
8
10
24
2
13
25
0
8
8
0
18
33
4
40
2
Final
Fed
1
1
5
3
0
4
3
6
0
3
0
23
3
0
1
1
0
2
1
3
2
4
0
1
1
8
3
0
3
0
1
0
1
6
2
4
2
0
3
1
1
5
1
2
2
1
3
4
0
. 4
0
0
6
20
2
0
1
Total
17
12
59
11
78
14
13
8
0
10
12
96
18
0
15
19
0
13
2
4
10
37
33
19
20
30
41
5
22
9
10
1
17
107
11
82
23
2
38
11
12
102
9
12
26
4
18
30
0
16
8
2
24
55
6
40
3
Total
47
1087 154
1296
19
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region)
February 1995
Final
Reg
1
2
3
4
5
6
State/Territory
Connecticut
Massachusetts
Maine
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont
New Jersey
New York
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
District of Colunbia
Delaware
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
Illinois
Indiana
Michigan
Minnesota
Ohio
Wisconsin
Arkansas
Louisiana
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Texas
Gen
13
22
7
16
10
8
76
100
78
8
0
186
0
18
8
95
18
4
143
9
50
11
19
2
21
24
13
149
33
32
76
38
31
40
250
12
12
8
9
25
Fed
1
8
3
1
2
0
15
6
4
1
0
11
0
1
4
5
6
2
18
3
5
2
1
0
2
2
3
18
4
0
0
3
3
0
10
0
1
2
1
4
Proposed
Gen
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
2
3
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
1
4
0
0
3
0
0
1
9
0
1
1
0
2
0
4
0
4
1
1
1
Fed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
Total
15
30
11
17
12
8
93
107
82
9
2
200
0
19
14
102
24
6
165
13
59
13
20
5
23
26
18
177
37
33
78
41
38
40
267
12
17
11
11
30
66
81
20
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region)
February 1995
Final
Reg
7
8
9
10
State/Territory
Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska
Colorado
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Utah
Wyoming
Conrnonwealth of Marianas
American Samoa
Arizona
California
Guam
Hauai i
Nevada
Trust Territories
Alaska
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
Gen
17
9
19
8
53
13
8
2
2
8
2
35
0
0
7
69
1
1
1
0
79
2
6
9
33
Fed
1
1
3
1
6
3
0
0
1
4
1
9
0
0
3
23
1
3
0
0
30
6
2
1
20
Proposed
Gen
1
1
0
1
3
2
1
0
1
4
0
8
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
0
2
1
2
Fed
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Total
19
12
22
10
63
18
9
2
4
16
3
52
0
0
10
96
2
4
1
0
113
8
10
12
55
50
29
85
Total
1087 154
47
1296
21
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
Date/Citation/Number of Sites
Date
October 23, 1981
115 ("Interim Priorities List")1
July 23, 1982
45 ("Expanded Higibility List")1
December 30, 1982 (47 FR 58476)
418 (proposal of first NPL, including 153 of 160 sites announced
previously)
March 4, 1983 (48 FR 9311)
1 (proposal of Times Beach, Missouri)
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658)
406 (promulgation of first NPL; 1 proposed site split into 2 sites;
1 site deleted; 6 proposed sites dropped; 7 sites remain proposed)
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40674)
133 (Proposed Rule #1)
May 8, 1984 (49 FR 19480)
4 (promulgation of 4 San Gabriel Valley Sites in California, part of
Proposed Rule #1)
September 21, 1984 (49 FR 37070)
128 (promulgation of 123 Proposed Rule #1 sites and 5 from
original proposal; 4 proposed sites dropped)
October 15, 1984 (49 FR 40320)
244, including 36 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #2)
February 14, 1985 (50 FR 6320)
2 (promulgation of Glen Ridge and Montclair/West Orange
Radium Sites in New Jersey, part of Proposed Rule #2)
April 10, 1985 (50 FR 14115)
32, including 6 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #3)
September 16, 1985 (50 FR 37630)
1 (promulgation of Lansdowne Radiation Site in Pennsylvania, part
of Proposed Rule #3)
September 18, 1985 (50 FR 37950)
41, including 3 Federal facility sites and one reproposed site
(Proposed Rule #4)
Number of Sites
Final
406
410
538
538
540
540
541
541
Proposed
115
160
418
419
140
136
4
248
246
278
277
318
Total
115
160
418
419
546
546
542
786
786
818
818
859
22
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21054)
170 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1-4; 8 sites
deleted)
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21099)
45, including 2 Federal Facility sites (Proposed Rule #5)
June 10, 1986 (5 1FR 21 109)
proposed RCRA policy; reopening of comment period for
5 sites
January 22, 1987 (52 FR 2492)
64, including 1 Federal facility site (Proposed Rule 16)
February 25, 1987 (52 FR 5578)
Availability of information
May 13, 1987 (52 FR 17991)
proposed RCRA policy for Federal facility sites
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27620)
99 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-6)
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27643)
7 (reproposal of Federal facility sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978)
43 (reproposal of RCRA sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23988)
229, including 14 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #7)
August 9, 1988 (53 FR 30002/30005)
RCRA policy statements
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10512)
(8 Federal facility sites)
and
March 31, 1989 (54 FR 13296)
101 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7;
4 proposed sites dropped)
May 5, 1989 (54 FR 19526)
10 (Proposed Rule #8)
July 14, 1989 (54 FR 29820)
52 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #9)
Number of Sites
Rnal
703
703
802
799*
8903
890
889>
Proposed
185
2482
149
378
273
283
335
Total
888
951
' 951
1,177
1,163
1,173
1,224
23
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
August 16, 1989 (54 FR 33846)
2 (proposal of ATSDR sites)
October 4, 1989 (54 FR 41000/41015)
93 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-8; 31 proposed
sites dropped)
October 26, 1989 (54 FR 43778)
25, including 2 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule /CIO, last
proposed rule under original HRS)
November 21, 1989 (54 FR 48184)
29 (promulgation of 27 Federal facility sites from Proposed Rule #9
and 2 ATSDR sites; expansion of 1 Federal facility site)
February 21, 1990 (55 FR 6154)
71 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7, 9;
1 proposed site dropped)
March 14, 1990 (55 FR 9688)
1 (promulgation of United Heckathorn Co., Richmond, California,
part of Proposed Rule #10)
August 30, 1990 (55 FR 35502)
106 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-10; 10
proposed sites dropped)
February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5598)
6 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-7, 10;
14 proposed sites dropped) (last final rule under original HRS)
May 9, 1991 (56 FR 21460)
1 (proposal of ATSDR site)
July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840)
22 (Proposed Rule #11, first proposed rule under revised HRS)
September 25, 1991 (56 FR 48438)
1 (promulgation of ATSDR site)
February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824)
30 (Proposed Rule #12)
October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47181)
33 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #11 and 12); first
final rule under revised HRS
October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47204)
9 (Proposed Rule #13)
Number of Sites
Final
889
9813
981
1,010
1,081
1,082
1.1873
1.1893
1.1883
1,188
1.1853
1.1833
1.2083'4
Proposed
337
213
238
209
137
136
20
0
1
23
22
52
28
Total
1,226
1,194
1,219
1,219
1,218
1,218
1,207
1,189
1,189
1,211
1,207
1,235
1,236
24
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
May 10, 1993 (58 FR 27507)
26 (Proposed Rule #14)
June 23, 1993 (58 FR 34018)
17 (Proposed Rule #15)
January 18, 1994 (59 FR 2568)
26 (Proposed Rule #16)
February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8724)
1 (promulgation of ALCOA (Point Comfort)/Lavaca Bay, Point
Comfort, Texas)
May 31, 1994 (59 FR 27989)
42 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1 1-16)
August 23, 1994 (59 FR 43314)
10 (Proposed Rule #17)
December 16, 1994 (59 FR 65206)
18 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules 12-14, 16 and 17)
February 1995
9 (Proposed Rule #18)
Number of Sites
Final
1.2023-4
1.1993-4
1.1923
1.1914
1.2323
1,232
1.2423
1.2413
Proposed
54
71
97
96
54
64
46
55
Total
1,256
1,270
1,289
1,287
1,286
1,296
1,288
1,296
'No Federal Register notice.
2Silver Creek Tailings, Park City, UT, removed October 17, 1986 as required by CERCLA Section 118(p).
'Reflects site(s) deleted since last rule.
'Reflects site(s) removed since last rule.
25
------- |