United States Environmental Protection Agency Offjce of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication 9320.7-051 February 1995 vxEPASupplementary Materials: National Priorities List, Proposed Rule Office of Emergency and Remedial Respons Hazardous Site Evaluation Division (5204G) ionse Intermittent Bulletin Volume 5, Number 1 The National Priorities List (NPL) informs the public of uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that warrant further investigation to determine if they pose risks to human health or the environment. Such sites are eligible for long-term "remedial action" financed under the Trust Fund established by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA). In October 1990, CERCLA was extended to September 30, 1994. An appropriation by Congress for Fiscal Year 1995 authorized Superfund to continue to operate. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the primary responsibility for managing the Superfund program. Table of Contents How Sites Are Placed on the NPL 2 Statutory Requirements and Listing Policies 3 NPL Status (February 1995) 4 How Sites Are Deleted From the NPL 5 Removing Proposed Sites 5 Key Dates In Superfund 6 Lists and Data Summaries 7 Federal Facilities Section (by State) 8 Proposed Sites (by State) . 13 Sites Deleted From NPL 16 NPL Sites Per State/Territory (by New Proposed Sites) 19 NPL Sites Per EPA Region 20 Federal Register Notices . 22 ------- HOW SITES ARE PLACED ON THE NPL EPA uses informal rulemaking to place sites on the NPL. Sites are first proposed to the NPL in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the sites (typically for 60 days), responds to the comments, and finally places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Section 300.425(c) of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), the Federal regulation by which CERCLA is implemented (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990), provides three mechanisms for placing sites on the NPL. The primary mechanism is EPA's Hazard Ranking System (HRS). The original HRS, developed in 1982, evaluated the relative threat a site posed to human health or the environment over five "pathways," or routes of exposure. The HRS score was based on the evaluation of three pathways through which contaminants can migrate: ground water, surface water, and air. The other two pathways, direct contact and fire/explosion, were evaluated to determine the need for i removal (emergency) action. HRS scores ranged from 0 to 100. An HRS score of 28.50 was selected as the cutoff point for the first proposed NPL to identify at least 400 sites, the minimum suggested by CERCLA. On December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532), EPA revised the HRS, as required by SARA. The revised HRS became effective on March 14, 1991. It is a more comprehensive and accurate scoring system than the original HRS and may add new types of sites to the NPL. The revised HRS retains the same cutoff score and basic approach as the original HRS, while incorporating SARA requirements as well as improvements identified as necessary by EPA and the public. The revised HRS retains the ground water, surface water, and ah* pathways, drops the direct contact and fire/explosion pathways, and adds a fourth pathway, soil exposure. All four can be used to calculate the site score. The second mechanism for placing sites on the NPL allows States or Territories to designate one top-priority site regardless of score. Of the 57 States and Territories, 39 have designated top-priority sites. Six of these sites have been deleted from the NPL because no further response was necessary. The third mechanism allows listing a site if it meets all three of these requirements: The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) of the U.S. Public Health Service has issued a health advisory that recommends removing people from the site. EPA determines the site poses a significant threat to public health. EPA anticipates it will be more cost-effective to use its remedial authority (available only at NPL sites) than to use its emergency removal authority to respond to the site. Nine sites have been proposed to the NPL on the basis of ATSDR advisories: Two are proposed to the NPL: Tennessee Products, Chattanooga, TN; and Raymark Industries, Inc., Stratford, CT. Five are on the NPL: Forest Glen Mobile Home Subdivision, Niagara Falls, NY, and Radium Chemical Co., Inc., New York City, NY (54 FR 48184, November 21, 1989); White Chemical Corp., Newark NJ (56 FR 48438, September 25, 1991); Austin Avenue Radiation Site, Delaware County, PA (57 FR 47181, October 14, 1992); and Lower Ecorse Creek Dump, Wyandotte, MI (59 FR 27989, May 31, 1994). One, Lansdowne Radiation Site, Lansdowne, PA has been deleted because all appropriate response has been completed (56 FR 46121, September 10, 1991). One, Quail Run Mobile Manor, Gray Summit, MO (48 FR 40674, September 8, 1983) was dropped from further consideration on February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5598). Because of an EPA removal action, ATSDR had rescinded its health advisory. ------- STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS AND LISTING POLICIES CERCLA restricts EPA's authority to respond to certain sites by expressly excluding some substances - - petroleum, for example - from the definition of "release." In addition, as a matter of policy, EPA may choose not to use CERCLA because the Federal government can undertake or enforce cleanup under other laws, thus preserving CERCLA funds for sites not covered by other laws. EPA has chosen not to use CERCLA for certain types of sites regulated by Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). However, if EPA later determines that sites not listed as a matter of policy are not being properly responded to, it may consider placing them on the NPL. RCRA-Rdated Sites When the first final NPL was promulgated in September 1983, EPA announced certain listing policies relating to sites that might qualify for the NPL. One of these policies involved facilities subject to RCRA Subtitle C. EPA's policy was generally not to place on the NPL, RCRA "regulated units" (for example, land disposal units that received hazardous waste after the effective date of the RCRA land disposal regulations) because EPA can require the owner/operator to clean up under RCRA. The RCRA cleanup process and standards are similar to those under CERCLA, ensuring that all actions taken will protect human health and the environment. In November 1984, the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) to RCRA were enacted, expanding EPA's authority to require corrective measures under Subtitle C. As a result of this broadened RCRA authority, EPA revised its policy for placing non- Federal RCRA-regulated sites on the NPL, and on June 10,1986 (54 FR 21057) announced that facilities subject to RCRA Subtitle C corrective action authorities would be placed on the NPL if one or more of these conditions exists: The facilities are owned by persons who have demonstrated an inability to finance appropriate corrective action by invoking bankruptcy laws. The facilities have lost authorization to operate (also known as the Loss of Interim Status, or LOIS provision), and there are additional indications that the owner or operator is unwilling to undertake corrective action. The facilities have not lost authorization to operate but have a clear history of unwillingness to undertake corrective action. These situations are determined on a case-by- case basis. On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978) and October 9, 1989 (54 FR 41000), EPA announced additional components of the NPL/RCRA policy. As a matter of policy, EPA will list four additional categories of RCRA-related sites: Facilities that were treating, storing, or disposing of Subtitle C hazardous waste after November 19, 1980, but that did not file a "Part A," the initial part of the permit application, by that date as required and have little or no history of compliance with RCRA. EPA believes that these non- or late filers, although they are technically subject to RCRA, are not likely to be cleaned up expeditiously under RCRA and so should be on the NPL. However, if such facilities have complied with RCRA, EPA may consider whether listing is necessary. Facilities with permits for the treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous waste issued before enactment of HSWA, and whose ~ owners/operators will not voluntarily modify the permit. Pre-HSWA permittees are not required to take corrective action for releases. Under RCRA Section 3004(u), EPA does not have the authority to modify a pre-HSWA permit for corrective action until the permit is reissued. Facilities that filed a Part A permit application for treatment, storage, or disposal of Subtitle C hazardous waste as a precautionary measure only. Such facilities - for example, generators, transporters, or recyclers of hazardous waste - are not subject to Subtitle C corrective action authorities. These are referred to as protective filers. ------- NPL Status (February 1995) Number of Sites on Final NPL Total: 1,241 General Superfund Section: 1,087 Federal Facilities Section: 154 Number of Sites Remaining on Proposed NPL Total: 55 General Superfund Section: 47 Federal Facilities Section: 8 Total Number of Final and Proposed Sites 1,296 Number of Sites on the Construction Completion List 282 Number of Sites Deleted from Final NPL 68 Facilities that at one time treated or stored Subtitle C hazardous waste but have since converted to generator-only status Q.e., facilities that now store hazardous waste for 90 days or less) or any other hazardous waste activity not requiring Interim Status. These facilities, whose Part A permit applications have been withdrawn with EPA or State approval, are referred to as converters. EPA believes it has the authority under RCRA Section 3008(u) to compel corrective action at such facilities. However, RCRA's corrective action program currently focuses primarily on treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (due to permitting deadlines in RCRA). Therefore, this category should be on the NPL to ensure expeditious cleanup. However, if a consent order requiring remedial action is in effect, a converter need not be listed. Federal FactDty Sites CERCLA Section 120(a) requires that Federal facilities be subject to and comply with CERCLA in the same manner as any nongovernmental entity. CERCLA Section lll(eX3), however, generally prohibits use of the Trust Fund for remedial actions at Federally owned facilities. Thus, Federal agencies must use their own funds for cleanup. Federal sites are listed in a separate section of Appendix B, rather than in the General Superfund Section. Because most Federal facilities have RCRA- regulated units within their boundaries, EPA determined that a separate NPL/RCRA policy should be adopted for Federal faculties. As a result, on March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10520), EPA announced it would place on the NPL those sites located on Federally owned or operated facilities that meet the NPL eligibility requirements - e.g., HRS scores of 28.50 or greater - even if the Federal facility also is subject to the corrective action authorities of RCRA Subtitle C. Cleanup, if appropriate, could then proceed at those sites under either CERCLA or RCRA. The policy is based on several considerations: Congress clearly intended that Federal facility sites should be on the NPL. Strict application of the non-Federal NPL/RCRA policy would exclude virtually all Federal facility sites from the NPL because they would not likely meet any of the criteria necessary for listing (inability to pay as evidenced by invocation of bankruptcy laws or demonstrated unwillingness to comply with RCRA). ------- Placing RCRA-regulated Federal sites on the NPL serves the primary purpose of listing Federal facility sites to advise the public of the. status of Federal government cleanup efforts. Listing these sites helps Federal agencies set priorities and focus cleanup efforts on those sites that present the most serious problem. Radioactive Release Sites CERCLA Section 101(22) excludes several types of releases of radioactive materials from the statutory definition of "release." These releases are therefore not eligible for CERCLA response actions or the NPL. The exclusions apply to (1) releases of source, by-product, or special nuclear material from a nuclear incident if these releases are subject to financial protection requirements under Section 170 of the Atomic Energy Act and (2) any releases of source, by-product, or special nuclear material from any processing site designated under the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978. Accordingly, such radioactive releases have not been considered eligible for the NPL. As a policy matter, EPA has also chosen not to list releases of source, by-product, or special nuclear material from any facility with a current license issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRQ, on the grounds that NRC has full authority to require cleanup of releases from such facilities. EPA will, however, list releases from facilities that hold a current license issued by a State pursuant to an agreement between the State and the NRC under Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act. Facilities whose licenses are no longer in effect are also considered for listing. HOW SITES ARE DELETED FROM THE NPL EPA may delete a final NPL site if it determines that no further response is required to protect human health or the environment. Under Section 300.425(e) of the NCP (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990.) a site may be deleted where no further response is appropriate if EPA determines that one of the following criteria has been met: EPA, in conjunction with the State, has determined that responsible or other parties have implemented all appropriate response action required. EPA, in consultation with the State, has determined that all appropriate Superfund- financed response under CERCLA has been implemented, and that no farther response by responsible parties is appropriate. A remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no significant threat to public health or the environment, and, therefore remedial measures are not appropriate. Since 1986, EPA has followed these procedures for deleting a site from the NPL: The Regional Administrator approves a "close- out report" which establishes that all appropriate response action has been taken or that no action is required. The Regional Office obtains State concurrence. EPA publishes a notice of intent to delete in the Federal Register and in a major newspaper near the community involved. A public comment period is provided. EPA responds to the comments and, if the site continues to warrant deletion, publishes a deletion notice in the Federal Register. Sites that have been deleted from the NPL remain eligible for further Superfund-financed remedial action in the unlikely event that conditions in the future warrant such action. As of February 1995, 68 sites have been deleted from the NPL, all but two in the General Superfund Section. REMOVING PROPOSED SITES As of February 1995, 76 sites (see page 16) have been proposed for the NPL but subsequently removed from further consideration, most of them because their final HRS scores were below the 28.50 cutoff or they are subject to RCRA Subtitle C. Three of the sites were reproposed on February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824) after being rescored with the revised HRS. ------- Key Dates in Superfund Legislation Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) enacted December 11,1980; Trust Fund of $1.6 billion authorized over 5 years CERCLA amended by Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) enacted October 17,1986; Trust Fund of $8.5 billion authorized over 5 years CERCLA extended to September 30, 1994; an additional $5.1 billion authorized Federal regulation implementing Superfund: National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) Revised July 16,1982 (47 FR 31180) to incorporate CERCLA requirements Revised March 8, 1990 (55 FR 8666) in response to CERCLA Section 105, amended by SARA Hazard Ranking System Promulgated July 16,1982 (47 FR 31180) as Appendix A of the NCP Revised December 14,1990 (55 FR 51532) in response to CERCLA Section 105(c), added by SARA; effective date March 14,1991 National Priorities List Promulgated September 8,1983 (48 FR 40658) as Appendix B of the NCP Must be updated at least annually Last sites proposed under original HRS promulgated February 11,1991 (56 FR 5598); Construction Completion category activated (56 FR 5634) First sites proposed under revised HRS July 29,1991 (56 FR 35840) First sites added to NPL under revised HRS October 14,1992 (57 FR 47181) Construction Completion List activated March 2,1993 (58 FR 12142) ------- LISTS AND DATA SUMMARIES ------- National Priorities List Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State) February 1995 St Site Name City/County Date Proposed Final AK Adak Naval Air Station AK Eielson Air Force Base AK Elmendorf Air Force Base AK Fort Richardson (USARHY) AK Fort Wainwright AK Standard Steel&Metals Salvage Yard(USDOT 6 Final * 0 Proposed = 6 AL Alabama Army Ammunition Plant AL Amiston Army Depot (SE Industrial Area) AL Redstone Arsenal (USARMY/NASA) 3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3 AZ Luke Air Force Base AZ Williams Air Force Base AZ Yuma Marine Corps Air Station 3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3 CA Barstow Marine Corps Logistics Base CA Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base CA Castle Air Force Base CA Concord Naval Weapons Station CA Edwards Air Force Base CA El Toro Marine Corps Air Station CA Fort Ord CA George Air Force Base CA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA) CA LEHR/Old Campus Landfill (USOOE) CA Lawrence Livermore Lab Site 300 (USOOE) CA Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (USOOE) CA March Air Force Base CA Mather Air Force Base CA HcClellan Air Force Base (GU Conta») CA Moffett Naval Air Station CA Norton Air Force Base CA Rivet-bank Army Ammunition Plant CA Sacramento Army Depot CA Sharpe Army Depot CA Tracy Defense Depot (USARMY) CA Travis Air Force Base CA Treasure Island Naval Station-Hun Pt An 23 Final + 0 Proposed = 23 CO Air Force Plant PJKS CO Rocky Flats Plant (USOOE) CO Rocky Mountain Arsenal (USARMY) 3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3 CT New London Submarine Base 1 Final + 0 Proposed * 1 DE Dover Air Force Base 1 Final + 0 Proposed » 1 Adak Fairbanks N Star Boro Greater Anchorage Bor Anchorage Fairbanks N Star Boro Anchorage Childersburg Amiston Huntsville Glendale Chandler Yuma Barstow San Diego County Merced Concord Kern County El Toro Marina Victorville Pasadena Davis Livemore Livermore Riverside Sacramento Sacramento Sunnyvale San Bernardino Riverbank Sacramento Lathrop Tracy Solano County San Francisco Waterton Golden Adams County New London Dover 10/92 07/89 07/89 06/93 07/89 07/89 10/84 10/84 06/93 07/89 07/89 06/88 07/89 07/89 10/84 02/92 07/89 06/88 07/89 07/89 02/92 01/94 07/89 10/84 07/89 10/84 10/84 04/85 10/84 06/88 10/84 10/84 07/89 07/89 07/89 07/89 10/84 10/84 05/94 11/89 08/90 05/94 08/90 08/90 07/87 03/89 05/94 08/90 11/89 02/90 11/89 11/89 07/87 12/94 08/90 02/90 02/90 02/90 10/92 05/94 08/90 07/87 11/89 07/87 07/87 07/87 07/87 02/90 07/87 07/87 08/90 11/89 11/89 11/89 10/89 07/87 10/89 08/90 10/84 03/89 ------- National Priorities List Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State) February 1995 Date St FL FL FL FL FL GA GA GU HI HI HI IA ID 10 IL IL IL IL KS KS ICY LA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA Site Name Cecil Field Naval Air Station Homestead Air Force Base Jacksonville Naval Air Station Pensacola Naval Air Station Uhiting Field Naval Air Station 5 Final + 0 Proposed = 5 Marine Corps Logistics Base Robins Air Force Base(Lf*4/Sludge lagoon 2 Final + 0 Proposed - 2 Andersen Air Force Base 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 Naval Computer I Telecomunications Area Pearl Harbor Naval Complex Schofield Barracks (USARMY) 3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3 Iowa Army Ammunition Plant 1 Final + 0 Proposed » 1 Idaho National Engineering Lab (USOOE) Mountain Home Air Force Base 2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2 Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (LAP Area) Joliet Army Annum" t ion Plant (Mfg Area) Sangamo Electric/Crab Orchard NWR (USOOI Savanna Army Depot Activity 4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4 Fort Riley Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant 1 Final + 1 Proposed = 2 Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USOOE) 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 Louisiana. Army Ammunition Plant 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 Fort Devens Fort Devens- Sudbury Training Annex Hanscom Field/Hanscom Air Force Base Materials Technology Laboratory (USARMY) Natick Laboratory Amy Research, DIE Cntr Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant Otis Air National Guard (USAF) South Weymouth Naval Air Station City/County Jacksonville Homestead Jacksonville Pensacola Milton Albany Houston County Yigo Oahu Pearl Harbor Oahu Middletown Idaho Falls Mountain Home Joliet Joliet Carterville Savanna Junction City DeSoto Paducah Doyline Fort Devens Middlesex County Bedford Uatertown Natick Bedford Falmouth Weymouth Proposed 07/89 07/89 07/89 07/89 01/94 07/89 10/84 02/92 01/94 07/91 07/89 07/89 07/89 07/89 04/85 10/84 10/84 10/84 07/89 02/95 05/93 10/84 07/89 07/89 05/93 06/93 05/93 06/93 07/89 06/93 Final 11/89 08/90 11/89 11/89 05/94 11/89 07/87 10/92 05/94 10/92 08/90 08/90 11/89 08/90 03/89 07/87 07/87 03/89 08/90 05/94 03/89 11/89 02/90 05/94 05/94 05/94 05/94 11/89 05/94 8 Final + 0 Proposed * 8 ------- National Priorities List Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State) February 1995 st HO HO HO HO HO HE HE HE HI HN MN HN Ufl MO HO HO NC NC NE NH NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ MM NH NY NY NY Site Name Aberdeen Proving Ground (Edgewood Area) Aberdeen Proving Ground(Michaelsville LF Beltsville Agricultural Research (USOA) Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center Patuxent River Naval Air Station 4 Final + 1 Proposed * 5 Brunswick Naval Air Station Loring Air Force Base Portsmouth Naval Shipyard 3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3 Wurtsmith Air Force Base 0 Final * 1 Proposed = 1 Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant New Brighton/Arden Hills/TCAAP (USARNY) Twin Cities Air Force Base(SAR Landfill) 3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3 t alrA f*{*u a . AfiMM I Dl *> f Ml 1 1 AM««^*M\ Lake city Army Afimu. riant (NW Lagoon) Weldon Spring Former Army Ordnance Works Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pitts(USOOE> 3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3 Camp Lejeune Military Res. (USHAVY) Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station 2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2 Cornhusker Army Ammunition Plant 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 Pease Air Force Base 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 Federal Aviation Admin. Tech. Center Fort Dix (Landfill Site) Naval Air Engineering Center Naval Weapons Station Earle (Site A) Pica tinny Arsenal (USARNY) W.R. Grace/Wayne Interim Storage (USOOE) 6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6 Cat West Metals (USSBA) Lee Acres Landfill (USOOI) 2 Final + 0 Proposed * 2 Brookhaven National Laboratory (USOOE) Griffiss Air Force Base Plattsburgh Air Force Bast City/County Edgewood Aberdeen Beltsville Indian Head St. Mary's County Brunswick Limestone Kittery losco County Fridley New Brighton Minneapolis St. Charles County St. Charles County Ons low County Have lock Hall County PortsMouth/Newi ngton Atlantic County Pemberton Township Lakehurst Colts Neck Rockaway Township Wayne Township Lean tar Fanni ngton Upton Rome Plattsburgh Oat Proposed 04/85 04/85 05/93 02/95 01/94 10/84 07/89 06/93 01/94 07/89 12/82 01/87 fl/a£ lU/O* 07/89 10/84 06/88 08/94 10/84 07/89 07/89 10/84 09/85 10/84 07/89 09/83 06/88 06/88 07/89 10/84 07/89 :e Final 02/90 10/89 05/94 05/94 07/87 02/90 05/94 11/89 09/83 07/87 f\f IfTf Ur /of 02/90 07/87 10/89 12/94 07/87 02/90 08/90 07/87 07/87 08/90 02/90 09/84 03/89 08/90 11/89 07/87 11/89 10 ------- National Priorities List Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State) February 1995 st NY OH OH OH OH OH OK OR OR PA PA PA PA PA PA PR RI RI SC sc so TN TM TN TN TX TX TX TX Site Name Seneca Army Depot 4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4 Air Force Plant 85 Feed Materials Production Center (USOOE) Mound Plant (USDOE) Rickenbacker Air National Guard (USAF) Wright-Patterson Air Force Base 3 Final + 2 Proposed = 5 Tinker Air Force(Soldier Cr/Bldg 300) 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 Fremont Nat. Forest Uranium Nines (USOA) Umatilla Army Depot (Lagoons) 1 Final * 1 Proposed = 2 Letterkenny Army Depot (POO Area) Letterkenny Army Depot (SE Area) Naval Air Development Center(8 Areas) Navy Ships Parts Control Center Tobyhanna Army Depot Willow Grove Naval Air 1 Air Res. Stn. 5 Final + 1 Proposed = 6 Naval Security Group Activity 1 Final « 0 Proposed * 1 Davisville Naval Construction Batt Cent Newport Naval Education/Training Center 2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2 Parr is Island Marine Corps Recruit Depot Savannah River Site (USOOE) 2 Final * 0 Proposed = 2 Ellsworth Air Force Base 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 Arnold Engineering Develop. Ctr. (USAF) Memphis Defense Depot (DLA) Milan Army Ammunition Plant Oak Ridge Reservation (USOOE) 3 Final + 1 Proposed * 4 Air Force Plant #4 (General Dynamics) Lone Star Army Amount t ion Plant Longhorn Array Ammunition Plant Pantex Plant (USDOE) City/County Romulus Columbus Fernald Miamisburg Lockbourne Dayton Oklahoma City Lake County Henri ston Franklin County Chambersburg Warminster Township Mechanicsburg Tobyhanna Willow Grove Sabana Seca North Kingston Newport Parris Island Aiken Rapid City Tul lahoma/Manchester Memphis Milan Oak Ridge Fort Worth Texarkana Karnack Pantex Village Oat Proposed 07/89 01/94 07/89 07/89 01/94 06/88 04/85 06/93 10/84 04/85 10/84 06/86 01/94 07/89 08/94 06/88 07/89 07/89 08/94 07/89 10/89 08/94 02/92 10/84 07/89 10/84 10/84 07/89 07/91 e Final 08/90 11/89 11/89 10/89 07/87 07/87 03/89 07/87 10/89 05/94 08/90 10/89 11/89 11/89 12/94 11/89 08/90 10/92 07/87 11/89 08/90 07/87 08/90 05/94 4 Final + 0 Proposed « 4 11 ------- National Priorities List Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State) February 1995 St Site Nam City/County Date Proposed Final UT Hill Air Force Base UT Monti cello Mill Tailings (USDOE) UT Ogden Defense Depot (OLA) UT Tooele Army Depot (North Area) 4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4 VA Defense General Supply Center (DLA) .VA Fort Eustis (US Army) VA Langley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr VA Marine Corps Combat Development Comnand VA Naval Surface Warfare - Dahlgren VA Naval Weapons Station -Yorktown 6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6 WA American Lake Gardens/McChord AFB WA Bangor Naval Submarine Base WA Bangor Ordnance Disposal (USNAVY) WA Bormeville Power Admin Ross (USDOE) WA Fairchild Air Force Base (4 Waste Areas) WA Fort Lewis (Landfill No. 5) WA Fort Lewis Logistics Center WA Hamilton Island Landfill(USA/COE) WA Hanford 100-Area (USDOE) WA Hanford 1100-Area (USDOE) WA Hanford 200-Area (USDOE) WA Hanford 300-Area (USDOE) WA Jackson Park Housing Complex (USNAVY) WA McChord Air Force Base (Wash Rack/Treat) WA Naval Air Station, Whidbey Is (Seaplane) WA Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island (Ault) WA Naval Undersea Warfare Station (4 Areas) WA Old Navy Dump/Manchester Lab(USEPA/NOAA) WA Port Hadlock Detachment (USNAVY) WA Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex '20 Final + 0 Proposed = 20 WV Allegany Ballistics Laboratory (USNAVY) WV West Virginia Ordnance (USARMY) 2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2 WY F.E. Warren Air Force Base 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 154 Final + 8 Proposed = 162 Ogden 10/84 07/87 Monti cello 07/89 11/89 Ogden 10/84 07/87 Tooele 10/84 08/90 Chesterfield County 10/84 07/87 Newport News 01/94 12/94 Hampton 05/93 05/94 Quantico 05/93 05/94 Dahlgren 02/92 10/92 Yorktown 02/92 10/92 Tacoma Silverdale Bremerton Vancouver Spokane County Tacoma Tillicum North Bormeville Benton County Benton County Benton County Benton County Kitsap County Tacoma Whidbey Island Whidbey Island Keyport Manchester Indian Island Bremerton 09/83 07/89 10/84 07/89 06/88 10/84 07/89 07/91 06/88 06/88 06/88 06/88 06/93 10/84 09/85 09/85 06/86 01/94 06/93 05/93 09/84 08/90 07/87 11/89 03/89 07/87 11/89 10/92 10/89 10/89 10/89 10/89 05/94 07/87 02/90 02/90 10/89 05/94 05/94 05/94 Mineral Point Pleasant Cheyenne 06/93 12/82 05/94 09/83 07/89 02/90 12 ------- National Priorities List Proposed Sites, by State February 1995 St Site Name Location Motes" XL General Superfund Sites Monarch Tile Manufacturing, Inc. 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 CA General Superfund Sites Cooper Drum Co. Del Aroo Facility GBF, Inc., Dump Stoker Company 4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4 co General Superfund Sites ASARCO, Inc. (Globe Plant) Smeltertown Site 2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2 CT General Superfund Sites Raymark Industries, Inc. 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 TL General Superfund Sites Brouard County--21st Manor Dunp Normandy Park Apartnents Plymouth Avenue Landfill Stauffer Chenical Co. (Tanpa Plant) 4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4 IA General Superfund Sites Waterloo Coal Gasification Plant 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 ID General Superfund Sites Blackbird Mine Triumph Mine Tailings Piles 2 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2 ix General Superfund Sites U.S. Smelter t Lead Refinery inc. 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 rs General Superfund Sites Ace Services Federal Facility Sites Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant 1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2 LA General Superfund Sites Gulf State Utilities-North Ryan Street Lincoln Creosote Old Citgo Refinery (Bossier City) Southern Shipbuilding 4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4 XD General Superfund Sites Ordnance Products, Inc. Federal Facility Sites Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center 1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2 MI General Superfund Sites West Site/Hows Corners 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 Florence South Gate Los Angeles Antioch Imperial Denver Salida Stratford Fort Lauderdale Teaple Terrace DeLand Tampa Waterloo Lemhi County Triumph East Chicago Colby DeSoto Lake Charles Bossier City Bossier Slidell Cecil County Indian Head Plymouth 13 ------- National Priorities List Proposed Sites, by State February 1995 St Site Name Location Notes a MI General Superfund Sites Bay City Middlegrounds Federal Facility Sites Wurtsmith Air Force Base 1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2 MS General Superfund Sites Chemfax, Inc. Potter Co. Texas Eastern Kosciusko Compressor Stn. 3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3 MT General Superfund Sites Burlington Northern Livingston Complex 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 KB General Superfund Sites Bruno Co-op Association/Associated Prop 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites » 1 MJ General Superfund Sites Horseshoe Road 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 xx General Superfund Sites Rinchem Co., Inc. 1 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites 1 OH General Superfund Sites Diamond Shamrock Corp(Painesville Works) Dover Chemical Corp. Federal Facility Sites Air Force Plant 85 Rickenbacker Air National Guard (USAF) 2 General Superfund Sites + 2 Federal Facility Sites > 4 or General Superfund Sites National Zinc Corp. 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility sites * 1 OR General Superfund Sites East Multnomah County Ground Wtr Contain. Federal Facility Sites Fremont Nat. Forest Uranium Mines (USDA) 1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2 FA General Superfund Sites East Tenth Street Federal Facility Sites Willow Grove Naval Air & Air Res. Stn. 1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites * 2 SD General Superfund Sites Annie Creek Mine Tailings 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites * 1 TM General Superfund Sites Tennessee Products Federal Facility Sites Arnold Engineering Develop. Ctr. (USAF) 1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites * 2 Bay City losco County Gulfport Wesson Kosciusko Livingston Bruno Sayreville Albuquerque Painesvilte Dover Colmfcus Lockbourne Bartlesvilie Multnonah County Lake County Marcus Hook Willow Grove Lead Chattanooga A Tul lahcM/Manchester 14 ------- National Priorities List Proposed Sites, by State February 1995 St Site Name Location Notes" TX General Superfund Sites RSR Corp. . Dallas 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 or General Superfund Sites Kemecott (North Zone) Magna Kennecott (South Zone) Copperton Hurray Smelter Murray City Richardson Flat Tailings Suntnit County 4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4 vz General Superfund Sites Island Chemical Corp/V.I. Chemical Corp St. Croix Tutu Wellfield Tutu 2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2 NA General Superfund Sites Boomsnub/Airco Vancouver Tulalip Landfill Marysville 2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2 47 General Superfund Sites + & Federal Facility Sites = 55 aA = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (if scored, MRS score need not be > 28.50). S = State top priority (included among the 100 top priority sites regardless of score). 15 ------- Sites Deleted from the NPL February 1995 st AL AR AS AZ CA CM CO CT DE FL FL FL FL GA IA IA 10 IL IN IN IN KS KS KS MA MO MO MI MI MI MI Site Name Mowbray Engineering Co. Cecil Lindsey Taputimu Farm Mountain View Mobile Home Estates Jibboom Junkyard PCS Warehouse Uoodbury Chemical Co. Revere Textile Prints Corp. New Castle Steel Parramore Surplus Pioneer Sand Co. Tri-City Oil Conservationist, Inc Varsol Spill Luminous Processes, Inc. Aidex Corp. LaBounty Site Arrcom (Drexler Enterprises) Petersen Sand & Gravel International Minerals (E. Plant) Poer Farm Wedzeb Enterprises, Inc. Big River Sand Co. Hydro-Flex Inc. Johns' Sludge Pond Plymouth Harbor/Cannon Engineering Corp. Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. Middletown Road Dump Charlevoix Municipal Well Gratiot County Golf Course Metal Working Shop Whitehall Municipal Wells Location Greenville Newport Island of Tutila Globe Sacramento Saipan Commerce City Sterling New Castle County Mount Pleasant Warrington Tampa Miami Athens Council Bluffs Charles City Rathdrun Libertyville Terre Haute Hancock County Lebanon Wichita Topeka Wichita Plymouth Baltimore Annapolis Charlevoix St. Louis Lake Ann Whitehall Date Deleted 12/30/93 09/22/89 03/07/86 04/18/88 09/10/91 03/07/86 03/22/93 09/02/94 03/17/89 02/21/89 02/08/93 09/01/88 09/01/88 12/30/82 10/21/93 10/06/93 12/23/92 02/11/91 02/11/91 02/11/91 09/10/91 10/14/92 11/09/93 01/06/92 11/19/93 12/30/82 04/18/88 12/02/93 09/08/83 12/23/92 02/11/91 16 ------- Sites Deleted from the NPL February 1995 st MM MN HN HO MS NC NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NM NY NY NY NY NY OH OR PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA TT TX Site Name Adrian Municipal Well Field Morris Arsenic Dump Union Scrap Iron & Metal Co. North-U Drive Well Contamination Ualcotte Chemical Co. Warehouses PCS Spills Beachwood/Berkley Wells Cooper Road Friedman Property Krysowaty Farm M&T Delisa Landfill Monroe Township Landfill Ringwood Mines/Landfill Pagano Salvage BEC Trucking BioClinical Laboratories, Inc. C & J Disposal Leasing Co. Dump Suffern Village Well Field Wide Beach Development Chemical & Minerals Reclamation Allied Plating, Inc. Enterprise Avenue Lansdowne Radiation Site Lehigh Electric t Engineering Co. Presque Isle Reeser's Landfill Voortman Farm Wade (ABM) West line Site PCS Wastes Harris (Farley Street) Location Adrian Morris Minneapolis Springfield Greenville 243 Miles of Roads Berkley Township Voorhees Township Upper Freehold Twp Hillsborough Asbury Park Monroe Township Ringwood Borough Los Lunas Town of Vestal Bohemia Hamilton Village of Suffern Brant Cleveland Portland Philadelphia Lansdowne Old Forge Borough Erie Upper Macungie Twp Upper Saucon Twp Chester West line Pacific Trust Terr Houston Date Deleted 12/30/92 03/07/86 09/10/91 09/08/94 12/30/82 03/07/86 01/06/92 02/22/89 03/07/86 02/22/89 03/21/91 05/01/94 11/02/94 10/14/92 10/14/92 10/11/94 09/20/94 05/28/93 08/30/94 12/30/82 11/14/94 03/07/86 09/10/91 03/07/86 02/13/89 05/31/90 05/31/89 03/23/89 10/14/92 03/07/86 04/18/88 17 ------- Sites Deleted from the MPL February 1995 st VA VA UA WA UA UI Site Name Matthews Electroplating Suffolk City Landfill Pesticide Lab (Yakima) Toftdahl Drums Yakima Plating Co. Waste Research & Reclamation Co. Location Roanoke County Suffolk Yakima Brush Prairie Yakima Eau Claire Date Deleted 01/19/89 01/24/95 09/01/93 12/23/88 08/23/94 02/05/93 Number of sites deleted: 68 18 ------- National Priorities List Final and Proposed Sites Per State/Territory (by Proposed Rule #18) February 1995 Proposed Rule 018 State/Territory Louisiana Kansas Florida Maine Michigan Maryland Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Commonwealth of Marianas Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Georgia Guam Hawai i Idaho Illinois Indiana loua Kentucky Massachusetts Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Trust Territories Utah Vermont Virgin Islands Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Gen 3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fed 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Proposed Gen 4 1 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 Fed 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Gen 12 9 50 7 76 8 9 2 0 7 12 69 13 0 13 18 0 11 1 1 6 33 32 17 19 22 38 2 19 8 8 1 16 100 8 78 21 2 31 9 9 95 8 10 24 2 13 25 0 8 8 0 18 33 4 40 2 Final Fed 1 1 5 3 0 4 3 6 0 3 0 23 3 0 1 1 0 2 1 3 2 4 0 1 1 8 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 6 2 4 2 0 3 1 1 5 1 2 2 1 3 4 0 . 4 0 0 6 20 2 0 1 Total 17 12 59 11 78 14 13 8 0 10 12 96 18 0 15 19 0 13 2 4 10 37 33 19 20 30 41 5 22 9 10 1 17 107 11 82 23 2 38 11 12 102 9 12 26 4 18 30 0 16 8 2 24 55 6 40 3 Total 47 1087 154 1296 19 ------- National Priorities List Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region) February 1995 Final Reg 1 2 3 4 5 6 State/Territory Connecticut Massachusetts Maine New Hampshire Rhode Island Vermont New Jersey New York Puerto Rico Virgin Islands District of Colunbia Delaware Maryland Pennsylvania Virginia West Virginia Alabama Florida Georgia Kentucky Mississippi North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee Illinois Indiana Michigan Minnesota Ohio Wisconsin Arkansas Louisiana New Mexico Oklahoma Texas Gen 13 22 7 16 10 8 76 100 78 8 0 186 0 18 8 95 18 4 143 9 50 11 19 2 21 24 13 149 33 32 76 38 31 40 250 12 12 8 9 25 Fed 1 8 3 1 2 0 15 6 4 1 0 11 0 1 4 5 6 2 18 3 5 2 1 0 2 2 3 18 4 0 0 3 3 0 10 0 1 2 1 4 Proposed Gen 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 4 0 0 3 0 0 1 9 0 1 1 0 2 0 4 0 4 1 1 1 Fed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 Total 15 30 11 17 12 8 93 107 82 9 2 200 0 19 14 102 24 6 165 13 59 13 20 5 23 26 18 177 37 33 78 41 38 40 267 12 17 11 11 30 66 81 20 ------- National Priorities List Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region) February 1995 Final Reg 7 8 9 10 State/Territory Iowa Kansas Missouri Nebraska Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Conrnonwealth of Marianas American Samoa Arizona California Guam Hauai i Nevada Trust Territories Alaska Idaho Oregon Washington Gen 17 9 19 8 53 13 8 2 2 8 2 35 0 0 7 69 1 1 1 0 79 2 6 9 33 Fed 1 1 3 1 6 3 0 0 1 4 1 9 0 0 3 23 1 3 0 0 30 6 2 1 20 Proposed Gen 1 1 0 1 3 2 1 0 1 4 0 8 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 2 Fed 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Total 19 12 22 10 63 18 9 2 4 16 3 52 0 0 10 96 2 4 1 0 113 8 10 12 55 50 29 85 Total 1087 154 47 1296 21 ------- FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES Date/Citation/Number of Sites Date October 23, 1981 115 ("Interim Priorities List")1 July 23, 1982 45 ("Expanded Higibility List")1 December 30, 1982 (47 FR 58476) 418 (proposal of first NPL, including 153 of 160 sites announced previously) March 4, 1983 (48 FR 9311) 1 (proposal of Times Beach, Missouri) September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658) 406 (promulgation of first NPL; 1 proposed site split into 2 sites; 1 site deleted; 6 proposed sites dropped; 7 sites remain proposed) September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40674) 133 (Proposed Rule #1) May 8, 1984 (49 FR 19480) 4 (promulgation of 4 San Gabriel Valley Sites in California, part of Proposed Rule #1) September 21, 1984 (49 FR 37070) 128 (promulgation of 123 Proposed Rule #1 sites and 5 from original proposal; 4 proposed sites dropped) October 15, 1984 (49 FR 40320) 244, including 36 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #2) February 14, 1985 (50 FR 6320) 2 (promulgation of Glen Ridge and Montclair/West Orange Radium Sites in New Jersey, part of Proposed Rule #2) April 10, 1985 (50 FR 14115) 32, including 6 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #3) September 16, 1985 (50 FR 37630) 1 (promulgation of Lansdowne Radiation Site in Pennsylvania, part of Proposed Rule #3) September 18, 1985 (50 FR 37950) 41, including 3 Federal facility sites and one reproposed site (Proposed Rule #4) Number of Sites Final 406 410 538 538 540 540 541 541 Proposed 115 160 418 419 140 136 4 248 246 278 277 318 Total 115 160 418 419 546 546 542 786 786 818 818 859 22 ------- FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES (continued) Date June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21054) 170 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1-4; 8 sites deleted) June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21099) 45, including 2 Federal Facility sites (Proposed Rule #5) June 10, 1986 (5 1FR 21 109) proposed RCRA policy; reopening of comment period for 5 sites January 22, 1987 (52 FR 2492) 64, including 1 Federal facility site (Proposed Rule 16) February 25, 1987 (52 FR 5578) Availability of information May 13, 1987 (52 FR 17991) proposed RCRA policy for Federal facility sites July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27620) 99 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-6) July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27643) 7 (reproposal of Federal facility sites) June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978) 43 (reproposal of RCRA sites) June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23988) 229, including 14 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #7) August 9, 1988 (53 FR 30002/30005) RCRA policy statements March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10512) (8 Federal facility sites) and March 31, 1989 (54 FR 13296) 101 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7; 4 proposed sites dropped) May 5, 1989 (54 FR 19526) 10 (Proposed Rule #8) July 14, 1989 (54 FR 29820) 52 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #9) Number of Sites Rnal 703 703 802 799* 8903 890 889> Proposed 185 2482 149 378 273 283 335 Total 888 951 ' 951 1,177 1,163 1,173 1,224 23 ------- FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES (continued) Date August 16, 1989 (54 FR 33846) 2 (proposal of ATSDR sites) October 4, 1989 (54 FR 41000/41015) 93 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-8; 31 proposed sites dropped) October 26, 1989 (54 FR 43778) 25, including 2 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule /CIO, last proposed rule under original HRS) November 21, 1989 (54 FR 48184) 29 (promulgation of 27 Federal facility sites from Proposed Rule #9 and 2 ATSDR sites; expansion of 1 Federal facility site) February 21, 1990 (55 FR 6154) 71 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7, 9; 1 proposed site dropped) March 14, 1990 (55 FR 9688) 1 (promulgation of United Heckathorn Co., Richmond, California, part of Proposed Rule #10) August 30, 1990 (55 FR 35502) 106 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-10; 10 proposed sites dropped) February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5598) 6 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-7, 10; 14 proposed sites dropped) (last final rule under original HRS) May 9, 1991 (56 FR 21460) 1 (proposal of ATSDR site) July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840) 22 (Proposed Rule #11, first proposed rule under revised HRS) September 25, 1991 (56 FR 48438) 1 (promulgation of ATSDR site) February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824) 30 (Proposed Rule #12) October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47181) 33 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #11 and 12); first final rule under revised HRS October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47204) 9 (Proposed Rule #13) Number of Sites Final 889 9813 981 1,010 1,081 1,082 1.1873 1.1893 1.1883 1,188 1.1853 1.1833 1.2083'4 Proposed 337 213 238 209 137 136 20 0 1 23 22 52 28 Total 1,226 1,194 1,219 1,219 1,218 1,218 1,207 1,189 1,189 1,211 1,207 1,235 1,236 24 ------- FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES (continued) Date May 10, 1993 (58 FR 27507) 26 (Proposed Rule #14) June 23, 1993 (58 FR 34018) 17 (Proposed Rule #15) January 18, 1994 (59 FR 2568) 26 (Proposed Rule #16) February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8724) 1 (promulgation of ALCOA (Point Comfort)/Lavaca Bay, Point Comfort, Texas) May 31, 1994 (59 FR 27989) 42 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1 1-16) August 23, 1994 (59 FR 43314) 10 (Proposed Rule #17) December 16, 1994 (59 FR 65206) 18 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules 12-14, 16 and 17) February 1995 9 (Proposed Rule #18) Number of Sites Final 1.2023-4 1.1993-4 1.1923 1.1914 1.2323 1,232 1.2423 1.2413 Proposed 54 71 97 96 54 64 46 55 Total 1,256 1,270 1,289 1,287 1,286 1,296 1,288 1,296 'No Federal Register notice. 2Silver Creek Tailings, Park City, UT, removed October 17, 1986 as required by CERCLA Section 118(p). 'Reflects site(s) deleted since last rule. 'Reflects site(s) removed since last rule. 25 ------- |