United States
             Environmental Protection
             Agency
    Offjce of
    Solid Waste and
    Emergency Response
Publication 9320.7-051
February 1995
 vxEPASupplementary  Materials:
             National  Priorities  List,
             Proposed  Rule
   Office of Emergency and Remedial Respons
   Hazardous Site Evaluation Division (5204G)
ionse
      Intermittent Bulletin
      Volume 5, Number 1
   The National Priorities List (NPL) informs the
public of uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that warrant
further investigation to determine if they pose risks to
human health or the  environment.   Such  sites are
eligible for long-term "remedial action" financed under
the Trust Fund established by  the  Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended by the Superfund
          Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA).
          In October 1990, CERCLA was extended to September
          30, 1994. An appropriation by Congress for Fiscal Year
          1995 authorized Superfund to continue to operate. The
          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the
          primary responsibility for  managing the Superfund
          program.
                                Table of Contents

  How Sites Are Placed on the NPL	2
  Statutory Requirements and Listing Policies  	3
  NPL Status (February  1995)	 4
  How Sites Are Deleted From the NPL	5
  Removing Proposed Sites	5
  Key Dates In Superfund 	6
  Lists and Data Summaries	7
      Federal Facilities Section  (by State)	8
      Proposed Sites (by State) .	  13
      Sites Deleted From NPL	  16
      NPL Sites Per State/Territory (by New  Proposed Sites)  	  19
      NPL Sites Per EPA Region	20
      Federal Register Notices  .	  22

-------
HOW SITES ARE PLACED
ON THE NPL

    EPA uses informal rulemaking to place sites on the
NPL. Sites are first proposed to the NPL in the Federal
Register.  EPA then accepts public comments on the
sites (typically for 60 days), responds to the comments,
and finally places on the NPL those sites that continue to
meet the requirements for listing.

    Section  300.425(c)  of the National   Oil  and
Hazardous  Substances  Pollution  Contingency   Plan
(NCP),  the Federal regulation by which CERCLA is
implemented (55 FR 8845, March 8,  1990), provides
three mechanisms for placing sites on the NPL.  The
primary mechanism is EPA's Hazard Ranking System
(HRS). The original HRS, developed in 1982, evaluated
the relative threat a site posed to human health or the
environment over   five  "pathways,"  or  routes of
exposure.  The HRS score was based on the  evaluation
of three pathways through which  contaminants can
migrate:  ground water,  surface water, and air.  The
other two pathways, direct contact and fire/explosion,
were evaluated  to  determine the need for  i
removal (emergency) action.  HRS scores ranged from
0 to 100.  An HRS score of 28.50 was selected as the
cutoff point for the first proposed NPL to identify at
least 400 sites, the minimum suggested by CERCLA.

    On December  14,  1990 (55 FR 51532),  EPA
revised the HRS, as required by SARA.  The revised
HRS became effective on March 14, 1991. It is a more
comprehensive and accurate  scoring system  than the
original HRS and  may add new types of sites to the
NPL.

    The revised HRS retains the same cutoff score and
basic approach as the original HRS, while incorporating
SARA requirements as well as improvements identified
as necessary by EPA and the public. The revised HRS
retains  the  ground water,  surface water,  and ah*
pathways, drops the direct contact and fire/explosion
pathways, and adds a fourth pathway, soil exposure. All
four can be used to calculate the site score.

    The second mechanism for placing sites on the NPL
allows States or Territories to designate one top-priority
site  regardless of  score.    Of  the  57 States  and
Territories, 39 have designated top-priority sites. Six of
these sites have been deleted from the NPL because no
further response was necessary.

    The third mechanism allows listing a site if it meets
all three of these requirements:

    •   The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
        Registry (ATSDR) of the U.S. Public Health
        Service  has issued  a health  advisory  that
        recommends removing people from the site.

    •   EPA determines the site poses a  significant
        threat to public health.

    •   EPA anticipates it will be more cost-effective
        to use its remedial authority (available only at
        NPL sites) than to use its emergency removal
        authority to respond to the site.

    Nine sites have been proposed to the NPL on the
basis of ATSDR advisories:

    •   Two are proposed to the NPL:   Tennessee
        Products,  Chattanooga,  TN;   and  Raymark
        Industries, Inc., Stratford, CT.

    •   Five are on the NPL:  Forest Glen Mobile
        Home Subdivision, Niagara Falls,  NY,  and
        Radium  Chemical Co., Inc., New York City,
        NY (54 FR 48184,  November 21, 1989);
        White Chemical Corp.,  Newark NJ (56 FR
        48438, September 25, 1991);  Austin Avenue
        Radiation Site,  Delaware County, PA (57 FR
        47181, October 14, 1992); and Lower Ecorse
        Creek Dump, Wyandotte, MI  (59 FR 27989,
        May 31, 1994).

    •   One, Lansdowne Radiation  Site, Lansdowne,
        PA has  been deleted  because  all appropriate
        response has been completed (56 FR 46121,
        September 10, 1991).

    •   One, Quail Run Mobile Manor, Gray Summit,
        MO (48 FR 40674, September 8,  1983)  was
        dropped  from further  consideration  on
        February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5598). Because of
        an EPA removal action, ATSDR had rescinded
        its health advisory.

-------
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
AND LISTING POLICIES

    CERCLA restricts EPA's authority  to respond to
certain sites by expressly excluding some substances -
- petroleum,  for example -  from the definition  of
"release."  In  addition, as a matter of policy, EPA may
choose not  to use  CERCLA  because  the  Federal
government can  undertake or enforce cleanup under
other laws, thus preserving CERCLA  funds for sites
not covered by other laws. EPA has chosen not to use
CERCLA for certain types of sites regulated by Subtitle
C  of  the  Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA)  and  the  Nuclear Regulatory  Commission
(NRC).  However, if EPA later determines that sites not
listed  as a matter  of policy are not being properly
responded to,  it may consider placing them on the NPL.

RCRA-Rdated Sites

    When the first final  NPL was  promulgated  in
September 1983, EPA announced certain listing policies
relating to sites that might qualify for the NPL. One of
these policies involved facilities subject to RCRA Subtitle
C.  EPA's policy was generally not  to place on the
NPL,   RCRA  "regulated units"  (for example,  land
disposal units that received hazardous waste after the
effective date of the RCRA land disposal regulations)
because EPA can require the owner/operator to clean up
under RCRA.   The  RCRA cleanup process  and
standards are similar to those under CERCLA, ensuring
that all actions taken will protect human health and the
environment.

    In November 1984, the Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments   (HSWA)  to  RCRA  were  enacted,
expanding  EPA's  authority  to  require  corrective
measures under Subtitle C.  As a result of this broadened
RCRA authority, EPA revised its policy for placing non-
Federal RCRA-regulated sites on the NPL, and on June
10,1986 (54 FR 21057) announced that facilities subject
to RCRA Subtitle C corrective action authorities would
be placed on the NPL if one or more of these conditions
exists:

    •   The  facilities are owned by persons who  have
        demonstrated an inability to finance appropriate
        corrective action by invoking bankruptcy laws.
    •   The facilities have lost authorization to operate
        (also known as the Loss of Interim Status, or
        LOIS provision), and  there are additional
        indications that the owner or operator    is
        unwilling  to undertake  corrective action.

    •   The  facilities have not  lost authorization to
        operate  but  have  a  clear   history  of
        unwillingness to  undertake corrective action.
        These situations are determined on a case-by-
        case basis.

    On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978) and October 9,
1989  (54 FR  41000),  EPA  announced additional
components of the NPL/RCRA policy. As a matter of
policy, EPA  will list  four additional categories of
RCRA-related sites:

    •   Facilities that were  treating,   storing,  or
        disposing of Subtitle C hazardous waste after
        November 19, 1980,  but that did not file a
        "Part A,"  the initial  part  of  the permit
        application, by that date as required and have
        little or no history of compliance with RCRA.
        EPA believes that these non- or late filers,
        although they are technically subject to RCRA,
        are not likely to  be cleaned up expeditiously
        under RCRA and so should be on the NPL.
        However, if such facilities have complied with
        RCRA,  EPA may consider whether listing is
        necessary.

    •   Facilities with  permits  for the treatment,
        storage, or disposal of hazardous waste issued
        before  enactment of  HSWA,   and whose
       ~ owners/operators  will not voluntarily modify
        the  permit.   Pre-HSWA permittees are not
        required to take corrective action for releases.
        Under RCRA Section 3004(u), EPA does not
        have the authority  to  modify a pre-HSWA
        permit for corrective action until the permit is
        reissued.

    •   Facilities that filed a Part A permit application
        for treatment, storage, or disposal of Subtitle C
        hazardous waste  as a precautionary  measure
        only.    Such  facilities  - for  example,
        generators,   transporters,   or  recyclers  of
        hazardous waste - are not subject to Subtitle C
        corrective  action authorities.   These  are
        referred to as protective filers.

-------
                              NPL Status (February 1995)
                                  Number of Sites on Final NPL
                                                  Total:   1,241
                          General Superfund Section:   1,087
                             Federal Facilities Section:      154
                         Number of Sites Remaining on Proposed NPL
                                                  Total:   55
                          General Superfund Section:   47
                             Federal Facilities Section:     8
                           Total Number of Final and Proposed Sites
                                               1,296
                     Number of Sites on the Construction Completion List
                                               282
                            Number of Sites Deleted from Final NPL
                                                68
    •    Facilities that  at one time treated or stored
        Subtitle C  hazardous waste but have since
        converted  to  generator-only  status  Q.e.,
        facilities that now store hazardous waste for 90
        days or less) or any other hazardous waste
        activity not requiring Interim Status.  These
        facilities, whose  Part A permit applications
        have  been withdrawn  with EPA  or State
        approval, are referred to as converters. EPA
        believes  it has the authority  under  RCRA
        Section 3008(u) to compel corrective action at
        such facilities.  However,  RCRA's corrective
        action program currently focuses primarily on
        treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (due
        to permitting deadlines in RCRA). Therefore,
        this category should be on the NPL to ensure
        expeditious cleanup.  However, if a consent
        order requiring remedial action is in effect, a
        converter need not be listed.

Federal FactDty  Sites

    CERCLA  Section  120(a)  requires that  Federal
facilities be subject to and comply with CERCLA in the
same manner as any nongovernmental entity. CERCLA
Section lll(eX3), however, generally prohibits use of
the Trust Fund for remedial actions at Federally owned
facilities. Thus, Federal agencies must use their own
funds for cleanup.  Federal sites are listed in a separate
section of Appendix B, rather than in the General
Superfund Section.

    Because  most  Federal facilities  have RCRA-
regulated units within their boundaries, EPA determined
that a separate NPL/RCRA policy should be adopted for
Federal faculties.  As a result, on March 13, 1989 (54
FR 10520), EPA announced it would place on the NPL
those sites located on Federally owned or operated
facilities that meet the NPL eligibility requirements  -
e.g., HRS scores of 28.50 or greater - even if the
Federal facility also is subject to the corrective action
authorities  of  RCRA  Subtitle  C.    Cleanup,   if
appropriate, could then proceed  at those  sites under
either CERCLA or RCRA.  The policy is based on
several considerations:

    •   Congress clearly intended that Federal facility
        sites should be on the NPL.

    •   Strict   application   of  the  non-Federal
        NPL/RCRA policy would exclude virtually all
        Federal facility  sites from the NPL because
        they would not likely meet any of the criteria
        necessary for  listing (inability  to pay  as
        evidenced by invocation of bankruptcy laws or
        demonstrated unwillingness  to comply with
        RCRA).

-------
    •   Placing RCRA-regulated Federal sites on the
        NPL  serves the primary purpose of listing
        Federal facility sites to advise the public of the.
        status of Federal government cleanup efforts.

    •   Listing these sites  helps Federal agencies set
        priorities and focus cleanup efforts on those
        sites that present the most serious problem.

Radioactive Release Sites

    CERCLA  Section 101(22) excludes several types of
releases of radioactive  materials  from the  statutory
definition of "release." These releases are therefore not
eligible for CERCLA response actions or the NPL. The
exclusions apply to (1) releases of source, by-product, or
special nuclear material from a nuclear incident if these
releases are subject to financial protection requirements
under Section 170 of the Atomic Energy Act and (2) any
releases of  source,  by-product,  or special nuclear
material from any processing site designated under the
Uranium Mill  Tailings Radiation Control Act  of 1978.
Accordingly, such  radioactive releases have not been
considered eligible for the NPL.

    As a policy matter, EPA has also chosen not to list
releases of  source,  by-product,  or special nuclear
material from any facility with a current license issued
by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRQ, on the
grounds that NRC has full authority to require cleanup
of releases from such  facilities. EPA will, however, list
releases from facilities that hold a current license issued
by a State pursuant to an agreement  between  the State
and the NRC under Section 274 of the Atomic Energy
Act. Facilities whose licenses are no longer in effect are
also considered for listing.

HOW SITES ARE DELETED
FROM THE NPL

    EPA  may delete a final NPL  site if it  determines
that no further response is  required  to protect human
health or the environment. Under Section 300.425(e) of
the NCP (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990.) a site may be
deleted where no further response is appropriate if EPA
determines that one of the following criteria has been
met:

    •   EPA, in  conjunction  with the  State,  has
        determined  that responsible or  other parties
        have  implemented all appropriate  response
        action required.
    •   EPA,  in  consultation  with the State,  has
        determined that all  appropriate Superfund-
        financed response under CERCLA  has  been
        implemented, and that no farther response by
        responsible parties is appropriate.

    •   A remedial investigation has shown that the
        release poses no significant threat  to public
        health  or the  environment, and,  therefore
        remedial measures are not appropriate.

    Since 1986, EPA has followed these procedures for
deleting a site from the NPL:

    •   The Regional Administrator approves a "close-
        out  report"   which   establishes   that  all
        appropriate response action has been taken or
        that no action is required.

    •   The Regional Office obtains State concurrence.

    •   EPA publishes a notice of intent to delete in the
        Federal Register and in a major newspaper
        near the  community involved.   A public
        comment period is provided.

    •   EPA responds to the comments and,  if the site
        continues  to  warrant deletion,  publishes  a
        deletion notice in the Federal Register.

    Sites that have been deleted  from the NPL remain
eligible for further Superfund-financed remedial action in
the unlikely event that conditions in the future warrant
such action.

    As of February 1995, 68 sites have  been deleted
from the NPL,  all but  two in the General Superfund
Section.
REMOVING PROPOSED SITES

    As of February 1995, 76 sites (see page 16) have
been proposed for the NPL but subsequently removed
from further consideration, most of them because their
final HRS scores were below the 28.50 cutoff or they
are subject to RCRA Subtitle C. Three of the sites were
reproposed on February 7,  1992 (57 FR 4824) after
being rescored with the revised HRS.

-------
                   Key Dates in Superfund
Legislation
 •   Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
    (CERCLA) enacted December 11,1980; Trust Fund of $1.6 billion authorized
    over 5 years

    CERCLA amended  by Superfund Amendments  and  Reauthorization Act
    (SARA) enacted October 17,1986; Trust Fund of $8.5 billion authorized over
    5 years

 •   CERCLA extended  to  September  30, 1994; an  additional $5.1  billion
    authorized
Federal regulation implementing Superfund: National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP)

 •   Revised July 16,1982 (47 FR 31180) to incorporate CERCLA requirements

 •   Revised March 8, 1990 (55 FR 8666) in response to CERCLA Section 105,
    amended by SARA


Hazard Ranking System

 •   Promulgated July 16,1982 (47 FR 31180) as Appendix A of the NCP

 •   Revised December 14,1990 (55 FR 51532) in response to CERCLA Section
    105(c), added by SARA; effective date March 14,1991
National Priorities List
    Promulgated September 8,1983 (48 FR 40658) as Appendix B of the NCP

    Must be updated at least annually

    Last sites proposed under original HRS promulgated February 11,1991 (56
    FR 5598);  Construction Completion category activated (56 FR 5634)

    First sites proposed under revised HRS July 29,1991 (56 FR 35840)

    First sites added to NPL under revised HRS October 14,1992 (57 FR 47181)

    Construction Completion List activated March 2,1993 (58 FR 12142)

-------
LISTS AND DATA SUMMARIES

-------
                                           National  Priorities List
                        Federal Facilities Section,  Final  and Proposed Sites  (by  State)
                                                 February  1995
St  Site Name
City/County
      Date

Proposed  Final
AK  Adak Naval Air Station
AK  Eielson Air Force Base
AK  Elmendorf Air Force Base
AK  Fort Richardson (USARHY)
AK  Fort Wainwright
AK  Standard Steel&Metals Salvage Yard(USDOT

         6 Final •*• 0 Proposed = 6

AL  Alabama Army Ammunition Plant
AL  Amiston Army Depot (SE Industrial Area)
AL  Redstone Arsenal (USARMY/NASA)

         3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3

AZ  Luke Air Force Base
AZ  Williams Air Force Base
AZ  Yuma Marine Corps Air Station

         3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3

CA  Barstow Marine Corps Logistics Base
CA  Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base
CA  Castle Air Force Base
CA  Concord Naval Weapons Station
CA  Edwards Air Force Base
CA  El Toro Marine Corps Air Station
CA  Fort Ord
CA  George Air Force Base
CA  Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA)
CA  LEHR/Old Campus Landfill (USOOE)
CA  Lawrence Livermore Lab Site 300 (USOOE)
CA  Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (USOOE)
CA  March Air Force Base
CA  Mather Air Force Base
CA  HcClellan Air Force Base (GU Conta»)
CA  Moffett Naval Air Station
CA  Norton Air Force Base
CA  Rivet-bank Army Ammunition Plant
CA  Sacramento Army Depot
CA  Sharpe Army Depot
CA  Tracy Defense Depot (USARMY)
CA  Travis Air Force Base
CA  Treasure Island Naval Station-Hun Pt An

         23 Final + 0 Proposed = 23

CO  Air Force Plant PJKS
CO  Rocky Flats Plant (USOOE)
CO  Rocky Mountain Arsenal (USARMY)

         3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3

CT  New London Submarine Base

         1 Final + 0 Proposed * 1

DE  Dover Air Force Base

         1 Final + 0 Proposed » 1
Adak
Fairbanks N Star Boro
Greater Anchorage Bor
Anchorage
Fairbanks N Star Boro
Anchorage
Childersburg
Amiston
Huntsville
Glendale
Chandler
Yuma
Barstow
San Diego County
Merced
Concord
Kern County
El Toro
Marina
Victorville
Pasadena
Davis
Livemore
Livermore
Riverside
Sacramento
Sacramento
Sunnyvale
San Bernardino
Riverbank
Sacramento
Lathrop
Tracy
Solano County
San Francisco
Waterton
Golden
Adams County
New London
Dover
  10/92
  07/89
  07/89
  06/93
  07/89
  07/89
  10/84
  10/84
  06/93
  07/89
  07/89
  06/88
  07/89
  07/89
  10/84
  02/92
  07/89
  06/88
  07/89
  07/89
  02/92
  01/94
  07/89
  10/84
  07/89
  10/84
  10/84
  04/85
  10/84
  06/88
  10/84
  10/84
  07/89
  07/89
  07/89
  07/89
  10/84
  10/84
05/94
11/89
08/90
05/94
08/90
08/90
07/87
03/89
05/94
08/90
11/89
02/90
11/89
11/89
07/87
12/94
08/90
02/90
02/90
02/90
10/92
05/94
08/90
07/87
11/89
07/87
07/87
07/87
07/87
02/90
07/87
07/87
08/90
11/89
11/89
11/89
10/89
07/87
  10/89   08/90
  10/84   03/89

-------
                                  National  Priorities  List
               Federal  Facilities Section,  Final  and Proposed  Sites  (by  State)
                                        February  1995
Date
St
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL

GA
GA

GU

HI
HI
HI

IA

ID
10

IL
IL
IL
IL

KS
KS

ICY

LA

MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
Site Name
Cecil Field Naval Air Station
Homestead Air Force Base
Jacksonville Naval Air Station
Pensacola Naval Air Station
Uhiting Field Naval Air Station
5 Final + 0 Proposed = 5
Marine Corps Logistics Base
Robins Air Force Base(Lf*4/Sludge lagoon
2 Final + 0 Proposed - 2
Andersen Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Naval Computer I Telecomunications Area
Pearl Harbor Naval Complex
Schofield Barracks (USARMY)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
Iowa Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed » 1
Idaho National Engineering Lab (USOOE)
Mountain Home Air Force Base
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (LAP Area)
Joliet Army Annum" t ion Plant (Mfg Area)
Sangamo Electric/Crab Orchard NWR (USOOI
Savanna Army Depot Activity
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
Fort Riley
Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 1 Proposed = 2
Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USOOE)
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Louisiana. Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Fort Devens
Fort Devens- Sudbury Training Annex
Hanscom Field/Hanscom Air Force Base
Materials Technology Laboratory (USARMY)
Natick Laboratory Amy Research, DIE Cntr
Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant
Otis Air National Guard (USAF)
South Weymouth Naval Air Station
City/County
Jacksonville
Homestead
Jacksonville
Pensacola
Milton

Albany
Houston County

Yigo

Oahu
Pearl Harbor
Oahu

Middletown

Idaho Falls
Mountain Home

Joliet
Joliet
Carterville
Savanna

Junction City
DeSoto

Paducah

Doyline

Fort Devens
Middlesex County
Bedford
Uatertown
Natick
Bedford
Falmouth
Weymouth
Proposed
07/89
07/89
07/89
07/89
01/94

07/89
10/84

02/92

01/94
07/91
07/89

07/89

07/89
07/89

04/85
10/84
10/84
10/84

07/89
02/95

05/93

10/84

07/89
07/89
05/93
06/93
05/93
06/93
07/89
06/93
Final
11/89
08/90
11/89
11/89
05/94

11/89
07/87

10/92

05/94
10/92
08/90

08/90

11/89
08/90

03/89
07/87
07/87
03/89

08/90

05/94

03/89

11/89
02/90
05/94
05/94
05/94
05/94
11/89
05/94
8 Final + 0 Proposed * 8

-------
                   National  Priorities  List
Federal Facilities Section,  Final  and Proposed Sites  (by  State)
                         February  1995

st
HO
HO
HO
HO
HO

HE
HE
HE

HI

HN
MN
HN
Ufl
MO
HO
HO

NC
NC

NE

NH

NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ

MM
NH

NY
NY
NY

Site Name
Aberdeen Proving Ground (Edgewood Area)
Aberdeen Proving Ground(Michaelsville LF
Beltsville Agricultural Research (USOA)
Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center
Patuxent River Naval Air Station
4 Final + 1 Proposed * 5
Brunswick Naval Air Station
Loring Air Force Base
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
Wurtsmith Air Force Base
0 Final * 1 Proposed = 1
Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant
New Brighton/Arden Hills/TCAAP (USARNY)
Twin Cities Air Force Base(SAR Landfill)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
t alrA f*{*u a . AfiMM I Dl • •*•> f Ml 1 1 AM««^*M\
Lake city Army Afimu. riant (NW Lagoon)
Weldon Spring Former Army Ordnance Works
Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pitts(USOOE>
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
Camp Lejeune Military Res. (USHAVY)
Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Cornhusker Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Pease Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Federal Aviation Admin. Tech. Center
Fort Dix (Landfill Site)
Naval Air Engineering Center
Naval Weapons Station Earle (Site A)
Pica tinny Arsenal (USARNY)
W.R. Grace/Wayne Interim Storage (USOOE)
6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6
Cat West Metals (USSBA)
Lee Acres Landfill (USOOI)
2 Final + 0 Proposed * 2
Brookhaven National Laboratory (USOOE)
Griffiss Air Force Base
Plattsburgh Air Force Bast

City/County
Edgewood
Aberdeen
Beltsville
Indian Head
St. Mary's County

Brunswick
Limestone
Kittery

losco County

Fridley
New Brighton
Minneapolis

St. Charles County
St. Charles County

Ons low County
Have lock

Hall County

PortsMouth/Newi ngton

Atlantic County
Pemberton Township
Lakehurst
Colts Neck
Rockaway Township
Wayne Township

Lean tar
Fanni ngton

Upton
Rome
Plattsburgh
Oat
Proposed
04/85
04/85
05/93
02/95
01/94

10/84
07/89
06/93

01/94

07/89
12/82
01/87
• fl/a£
lU/O*
07/89
10/84

06/88
08/94

10/84

07/89

07/89
10/84
09/85
10/84
07/89
09/83

06/88
06/88

07/89
10/84
07/89
:e
Final
02/90
10/89
05/94
05/94

07/87
02/90
05/94
—


11/89
09/83
07/87
f\f IfTf
Ur /of
02/90
07/87

10/89
12/94

07/87

02/90

08/90
07/87
07/87
08/90
02/90
09/84

03/89
08/90

11/89
07/87
11/89
                             10

-------
                                  National  Priorities  List
               Federal  Facilities  Section,  Final  and Proposed Sites  (by  State)
                                        February  1995

st
NY

OH
OH
OH
OH
OH

OK

OR
OR

PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA

PR

RI
RI

SC
sc

so

TN
TM
TN
TN

TX
TX
TX
TX

Site Name
Seneca Army Depot
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
Air Force Plant 85
Feed Materials Production Center (USOOE)
Mound Plant (USDOE)
Rickenbacker Air National Guard (USAF)
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
3 Final + 2 Proposed = 5
Tinker Air Force(Soldier Cr/Bldg 300)
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Fremont Nat. Forest Uranium Nines (USOA)
Umatilla Army Depot (Lagoons)
1 Final * 1 Proposed = 2
Letterkenny Army Depot (POO Area)
Letterkenny Army Depot (SE Area)
Naval Air Development Center(8 Areas)
Navy Ships Parts Control Center
Tobyhanna Army Depot
Willow Grove Naval Air 1 Air Res. Stn.
5 Final + 1 Proposed = 6
Naval Security Group Activity
1 Final «• 0 Proposed * 1
Davisville Naval Construction Batt Cent
Newport Naval Education/Training Center
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Parr is Island Marine Corps Recruit Depot
Savannah River Site (USOOE)
2 Final * 0 Proposed = 2
Ellsworth Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Arnold Engineering Develop. Ctr. (USAF)
Memphis Defense Depot (DLA)
Milan Army Ammunition Plant
Oak Ridge Reservation (USOOE)
3 Final + 1 Proposed * 4
Air Force Plant #4 (General Dynamics)
Lone Star Army Amount t ion Plant
Longhorn Array Ammunition Plant
Pantex Plant (USDOE)

City/County
Romulus

Columbus
Fernald
Miamisburg
Lockbourne
Dayton

Oklahoma City

Lake County
Henri ston

Franklin County
Chambersburg
Warminster Township
Mechanicsburg
Tobyhanna
Willow Grove

Sabana Seca

North Kingston
Newport

Parris Island
Aiken

Rapid City

Tul lahoma/Manchester
Memphis
Milan
Oak Ridge

Fort Worth
Texarkana
Karnack
Pantex Village
Oat
Proposed
07/89

01/94
07/89
07/89
01/94
06/88

04/85

06/93
10/84

04/85
10/84
06/86
01/94
07/89
08/94

06/88

07/89
07/89

08/94
07/89

10/89

08/94
02/92
10/84
07/89

10/84
10/84
07/89
07/91
e
Final
08/90

11/89
11/89
10/89

07/87

07/87

03/89
07/87
10/89
05/94
08/90

10/89

11/89
11/89

12/94
11/89

08/90

10/92
07/87
11/89

08/90
07/87
08/90
05/94
4 Final + 0 Proposed « 4
                                            11

-------
                                            National Priorities List
                         Federal  Facilities  Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
                                                  February 1995
 St  Site Nam
City/County
      Date

Proposed  Final
 UT  Hill  Air Force Base
 UT  Monti cello Mill Tailings (USDOE)
 UT  Ogden Defense Depot (OLA)
 UT  Tooele Army Depot (North Area)

          4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4

 VA  Defense General Supply Center (DLA)
.VA  Fort  Eustis (US Army)
 VA  Langley Air Force Base/NASA Langley  Cntr
 VA  Marine Corps Combat Development Comnand
 VA  Naval  Surface Warfare - Dahlgren
 VA  Naval  Weapons Station -Yorktown

          6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6

 WA  American Lake Gardens/McChord AFB
 WA  Bangor Naval Submarine Base
 WA  Bangor Ordnance Disposal (USNAVY)
 WA  Bormeville Power Admin Ross (USDOE)
 WA  Fairchild Air Force Base (4 Waste Areas)
 WA  Fort  Lewis (Landfill No. 5)
 WA  Fort  Lewis Logistics Center
 WA  Hamilton Island Landfill(USA/COE)
 WA  Hanford 100-Area (USDOE)
 WA  Hanford 1100-Area (USDOE)
 WA  Hanford 200-Area (USDOE)
 WA  Hanford 300-Area (USDOE)
 WA  Jackson Park Housing Complex (USNAVY)
 WA  McChord Air Force Base (Wash Rack/Treat)
 WA  Naval Air Station, Whidbey Is (Seaplane)
 WA  Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island (Ault)
 WA  Naval  Undersea Warfare Station  (4 Areas)
 WA  Old Navy Dump/Manchester Lab(USEPA/NOAA)
 WA  Port  Hadlock Detachment (USNAVY)
 WA  Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex

         '20 Final + 0 Proposed = 20

 WV  Allegany Ballistics Laboratory  (USNAVY)
 WV  West  Virginia Ordnance (USARMY)

          2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2

 WY  F.E.  Warren Air Force Base

          1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1

        154 Final + 8 Proposed = 162
Ogden                   10/84    07/87
Monti cello              07/89    11/89
Ogden                   10/84    07/87
Tooele                  10/84    08/90
Chesterfield County     10/84   07/87
Newport News            01/94   12/94
Hampton                 05/93   05/94
Quantico                05/93   05/94
Dahlgren                02/92   10/92
Yorktown                02/92   10/92
Tacoma
Silverdale
Bremerton
Vancouver
Spokane County
Tacoma
Tillicum
North Bormeville
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Kitsap County
Tacoma
Whidbey Island
Whidbey Island
Keyport
Manchester
Indian Island
Bremerton
09/83
07/89
10/84
07/89
06/88
10/84
07/89
07/91
06/88
06/88
06/88
06/88
06/93
10/84
09/85
09/85
06/86
01/94
06/93
05/93
09/84
08/90
07/87
11/89
03/89
07/87
11/89
10/92
10/89
10/89
10/89
10/89
05/94
07/87
02/90
02/90
10/89
05/94
05/94
05/94
Mineral
Point Pleasant
Cheyenne
  06/93
  12/82
05/94
09/83
  07/89   02/90
                                                     12

-------
                                          National Priorities List
                                          Proposed Sites, by State
                                                February 1995
St
              Site Name
Location
Motes"
XL    General Superfund Sites
          Monarch Tile Manufacturing, Inc.
      1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1

CA    General Superfund Sites
          Cooper Drum Co.
          Del Aroo Facility
          GBF, Inc., Dump
          Stoker Company
      4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4

co    General Superfund Sites
          ASARCO, Inc. (Globe Plant)
          Smeltertown Site
      2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2

CT    General Superfund Sites
          Raymark Industries, Inc.
      1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1

TL    General Superfund Sites
          Brouard County--21st Manor Dunp
          Normandy Park Apartnents
          Plymouth Avenue Landfill
          Stauffer Chenical Co. (Tanpa Plant)
      4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4

IA    General Superfund Sites
          Waterloo Coal Gasification Plant
      1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1

ID    General Superfund Sites
          Blackbird Mine
          Triumph Mine Tailings Piles
      2 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2

ix    General Superfund Sites
          U.S. Smelter t Lead Refinery inc.
      1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1

rs    General Superfund Sites
          Ace Services
      Federal Facility Sites
          Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant
      1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2

LA    General Superfund Sites
          Gulf State Utilities-North Ryan Street
          Lincoln Creosote
          Old Citgo Refinery (Bossier City)
          Southern Shipbuilding
      4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4

XD    General Superfund Sites
          Ordnance Products, Inc.
      Federal Facility Sites
          Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center
      1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2

MI    General Superfund Sites
          West Site/Hows Corners
      1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
Florence
South Gate
Los Angeles
Antioch
Imperial
Denver
Salida
Stratford
Fort Lauderdale
Teaple Terrace
DeLand
Tampa
Waterloo
Lemhi County
Triumph
East Chicago



Colby

DeSoto
Lake Charles
Bossier City
Bossier
Slidell
Cecil County

Indian Head



Plymouth
                                                    13

-------
                                          National Priorities List
                                          Proposed Sites,  by State
                                                February 1995
St
              Site Name
                                                                        Location
Notes
                                                                                                  a
MI    General Superfund Sites
          Bay City Middlegrounds
      Federal Facility Sites
          Wurtsmith Air Force Base
      1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2

MS    General Superfund Sites
          Chemfax, Inc.
          Potter Co.
          Texas Eastern Kosciusko Compressor Stn.
      3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3

MT    General Superfund Sites
          Burlington Northern Livingston Complex
      1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1

KB    General Superfund Sites
          Bruno Co-op Association/Associated Prop
      1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites » 1

MJ    General Superfund Sites
          Horseshoe Road
      1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1

xx    General Superfund Sites
          Rinchem Co., Inc.
      1 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites • 1

OH    General Superfund Sites
          Diamond Shamrock Corp(Painesville Works)
          Dover Chemical Corp.
      Federal Facility Sites
          Air Force Plant 85
          Rickenbacker Air National Guard (USAF)
      2 General Superfund Sites + 2 Federal Facility Sites > 4

or    General Superfund Sites
          National Zinc Corp.
      1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility sites * 1

OR    General Superfund Sites
          East Multnomah County Ground Wtr Contain.
      Federal Facility Sites
          Fremont Nat. Forest Uranium Mines (USDA)
      1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2

FA    General Superfund Sites
          East Tenth Street
      Federal Facility Sites
          Willow Grove Naval Air & Air Res. Stn.
      1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites * 2

SD    General Superfund Sites
          Annie Creek Mine Tailings
      1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites * 1

TM    General Superfund Sites
          Tennessee Products
      Federal Facility Sites
          Arnold Engineering Develop. Ctr. (USAF)
      1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites * 2
                                                                        Bay City

                                                                        losco County
                                                                        Gulfport
                                                                        Wesson
                                                                        Kosciusko
                                                                        Livingston
                                                                        Bruno
                                                                        Sayreville
                                                                        Albuquerque
                                                                        Painesvilte
                                                                        Dover

                                                                        Colmfcus
                                                                        Lockbourne
                                                                        Bartlesvilie



                                                                        Multnonah  County

                                                                        Lake  County



                                                                        Marcus  Hook

                                                                        Willow  Grove



                                                                        Lead



                                                                        Chattanooga            A

                                                                        Tul lahcM/Manchester
                                                    14

-------
                                           National  Priorities List
                                           Proposed  Sites,  by State
                                                 February 1995
 St
               Site Name
Location
Notes"
 TX    General Superfund Sites
           RSR Corp.                            .                         Dallas
       1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites  = 1

 or    General Superfund Sites
           Kemecott (North Zone)                                        Magna
           Kennecott (South Zone)                                        Copperton
           Hurray Smelter                                                Murray  City
           Richardson Flat Tailings                                      Suntnit  County
       4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites  = 4

 vz    General Superfund Sites
           Island Chemical Corp/V.I. Chemical Corp                       St.  Croix
           Tutu Wellfield                                                Tutu
       2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites  = 2

 NA    General Superfund Sites
           Boomsnub/Airco                                                Vancouver
           Tulalip Landfill                                              Marysville
       2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites  = 2

       47 General Superfund Sites + & Federal Facility Sites = 55


aA = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and  Disease Registry
    (if scored, MRS score need not be > 28.50).
 S = State top priority (included among the 100 top priority sites regardless of score).
                                                     15

-------
Sites Deleted from the NPL
      February 1995
st
AL
AR
AS
AZ
CA
CM
CO
CT
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
IA
IA
10
IL
IN
IN
IN
KS
KS
KS
MA
MO
MO
MI
MI
MI
MI
Site Name
Mowbray Engineering Co.
Cecil Lindsey
Taputimu Farm
Mountain View Mobile Home Estates
Jibboom Junkyard
PCS Warehouse
Uoodbury Chemical Co.
Revere Textile Prints Corp.
New Castle Steel
Parramore Surplus
Pioneer Sand Co.
Tri-City Oil Conservationist, Inc
Varsol Spill
Luminous Processes, Inc.
Aidex Corp.
LaBounty Site
Arrcom (Drexler Enterprises)
Petersen Sand & Gravel
International Minerals (E. Plant)
Poer Farm
Wedzeb Enterprises, Inc.
Big River Sand Co.
Hydro-Flex Inc.
Johns' Sludge Pond
Plymouth Harbor/Cannon Engineering Corp. •
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc.
Middletown Road Dump
Charlevoix Municipal Well
Gratiot County Golf Course
Metal Working Shop
Whitehall Municipal Wells
Location
Greenville
Newport
Island of Tutila
Globe
Sacramento
Saipan
Commerce City
Sterling
New Castle County
Mount Pleasant
Warrington
Tampa
Miami
Athens
Council Bluffs
Charles City
Rathdrun
Libertyville
Terre Haute
Hancock County
Lebanon
Wichita
Topeka
Wichita
Plymouth
Baltimore
Annapolis
Charlevoix
St. Louis
Lake Ann
Whitehall
Date
Deleted
12/30/93
09/22/89
03/07/86
04/18/88
09/10/91
03/07/86
03/22/93
09/02/94
03/17/89
02/21/89
02/08/93
09/01/88
09/01/88
12/30/82
10/21/93
10/06/93
12/23/92
02/11/91
02/11/91
02/11/91
09/10/91
10/14/92
11/09/93
01/06/92
11/19/93
12/30/82
04/18/88
12/02/93
09/08/83
12/23/92
02/11/91
          16

-------
Sites Deleted from the NPL
      February 1995
st
MM
MN
HN
HO
MS
NC
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NM
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
OH
OR
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
TT
TX
Site Name
Adrian Municipal Well Field
Morris Arsenic Dump
Union Scrap Iron & Metal Co.
North-U Drive Well Contamination
Ualcotte Chemical Co. Warehouses
PCS Spills
Beachwood/Berkley Wells
Cooper Road
Friedman Property
Krysowaty Farm
M&T Delisa Landfill
Monroe Township Landfill
Ringwood Mines/Landfill
Pagano Salvage
BEC Trucking
BioClinical Laboratories, Inc.
C & J Disposal Leasing Co. Dump
Suffern Village Well Field
Wide Beach Development
Chemical & Minerals Reclamation
Allied Plating, Inc.
Enterprise Avenue
Lansdowne Radiation Site
Lehigh Electric t Engineering Co.
Presque Isle
Reeser's Landfill
Voortman Farm
Wade (ABM)
West line Site
PCS Wastes
Harris (Farley Street)
Location
Adrian
Morris
Minneapolis
Springfield
Greenville
243 Miles of Roads
Berkley Township
Voorhees Township
Upper Freehold Twp
Hillsborough
Asbury Park
Monroe Township
Ringwood Borough
Los Lunas
Town of Vestal
Bohemia
Hamilton
Village of Suffern
Brant
Cleveland
Portland
Philadelphia
Lansdowne
Old Forge Borough
Erie
Upper Macungie Twp
Upper Saucon Twp
Chester
West line
Pacific Trust Terr
Houston
Date
Deleted
12/30/92
03/07/86
09/10/91
09/08/94
12/30/82
03/07/86
01/06/92
02/22/89
03/07/86
02/22/89
03/21/91
05/01/94
11/02/94
10/14/92
10/14/92
10/11/94
09/20/94
05/28/93
08/30/94
12/30/82
11/14/94
03/07/86
09/10/91
03/07/86
02/13/89
05/31/90
05/31/89
03/23/89
10/14/92
03/07/86
04/18/88
           17

-------
                                          Sites Deleted from the MPL
                                                February 1995
st
VA
VA
UA
WA
UA
UI
Site Name
Matthews Electroplating
Suffolk City Landfill
Pesticide Lab (Yakima)
Toftdahl Drums
Yakima Plating Co.
Waste Research & Reclamation Co.
Location
Roanoke County
Suffolk
Yakima
Brush Prairie
Yakima
Eau Claire
Date
Deleted
01/19/89
01/24/95
09/01/93
12/23/88
08/23/94
02/05/93
Number of sites deleted:   68
                                                    18

-------
                               National  Priorities List
                     Final and Proposed Sites Per State/Territory
                                (by Proposed Rule #18)
                                     February 1995
Proposed Rule 018
State/Territory
Louisiana
Kansas
Florida
Maine
Michigan
Maryland
Alabama
Alaska
American Samoa
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Commonwealth of Marianas
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Georgia
Guam
Hawai i
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
loua
Kentucky
Massachusetts
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Trust Territories
Utah
Vermont
Virgin Islands
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Gen
3
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Fed
0
1
0
0
0
1
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Proposed
Gen
4
1
4
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
4
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
3
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
4
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
Fed
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Gen
12
9
50
7
76
8
9
2
0
7
12
69
13
0
13
18
0
11
1
1
6
33
32
17
19
22
38
2
19
8
8
1
16
100
8
78
21
2
31
9
9
95
8
10
24
2
13
25
0
8
8
0
18
33
4
40
2
Final
Fed
1
1
5
3
0
4
3
6
0
3
0
23
3
0
1
1
0
2
1
3
2
4
0
1
1
8
3
0
3
0
1
0
1
6
2
4
2
0
3
1
1
5
1
2
2
1
3
4
0
. 4
0
0
6
20
2
0
1
Total
17
12
59
11
78
14
13
8
0
10
12
96
18
0
15
19
0
13
2
4
10
37
33
19
20
30
41
5
22
9
10
1
17
107
11
82
23
2
38
11
12
102
9
12
26
4
18
30
0
16
8
2
24
55
6
40
3
Total
47
1087    154
1296
                                         19

-------
        National  Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region)
              February 1995
Final
Reg
1






2




3






4








5






6




State/Territory
Connecticut
Massachusetts
Maine
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont

New Jersey
New York
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands

District of Colunbia
Delaware
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia

Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee

Illinois
Indiana
Michigan
Minnesota
Ohio
Wisconsin

Arkansas
Louisiana
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Texas
Gen
13
22
7
16
10
8
76
100
78
8
0
186
0
18
8
95
18
4
143
9
50
11
19
2
21
24
13
149
33
32
76
38
31
40
250
12
12
8
9
25
Fed
1
8
3
1
2
0
15
6
4
1
0
11
0
1
4
5
6
2
18
3
5
2
1
0
2
2
3
18
4
0
0
3
3
0
10
0
1
2
1
4
Proposed
Gen
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
2
3
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
1
4
0
0
3
0
0
1
9
0
1
1
0
2
0
4
0
4
1
1
1
Fed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
Total
15
30
11
17
12
8
93
107
82
9
2
200
0
19
14
102
24
6
165
13
59
13
20
5
23
26
18
177
37
33
78
41
38
40
267
12
17
11
11
30
                 66
81
                  20

-------
        National  Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA  Region)
              February 1995
Final
Reg
7




8






9








10



State/Territory
Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska

Colorado
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Utah
Wyoming

Conrnonwealth of Marianas
American Samoa
Arizona
California
Guam
Hauai i
Nevada
Trust Territories

Alaska
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
Gen
17
9
19
8
53
13
8
2
2
8
2
35
0
0
7
69
1
1
1
0
79
2
6
9
33
Fed
1
1
3
1
6
3
0
0
1
4
1
9
0
0
3
23 —
1
3
0
0
30
6
2
1
20
Proposed
Gen
1
1
0
1
3
2
1
0
1
4
0
8
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
0
2
1
2
Fed
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Total
19
12
22
10
63
18
9
2
4
16
3
52
0
0
10
96
2
4
1
0
113
8
10
12
55
                 50
         29
                  85
 Total
1087    154
47
1296
                  21

-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
Date/Citation/Number of Sites
Date
October 23, 1981
115 ("Interim Priorities List")1
July 23, 1982
45 ("Expanded Higibility List")1
December 30, 1982 (47 FR 58476)
418 (proposal of first NPL, including 153 of 160 sites announced
previously)
March 4, 1983 (48 FR 9311)
1 (proposal of Times Beach, Missouri)
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658)
406 (promulgation of first NPL; 1 proposed site split into 2 sites;
1 site deleted; 6 proposed sites dropped; 7 sites remain proposed)
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40674)
133 (Proposed Rule #1)
May 8, 1984 (49 FR 19480)
4 (promulgation of 4 San Gabriel Valley Sites in California, part of
Proposed Rule #1)
September 21, 1984 (49 FR 37070)
128 (promulgation of 123 Proposed Rule #1 sites and 5 from
original proposal; 4 proposed sites dropped)
October 15, 1984 (49 FR 40320)
244, including 36 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #2)
February 14, 1985 (50 FR 6320)
2 (promulgation of Glen Ridge and Montclair/West Orange
Radium Sites in New Jersey, part of Proposed Rule #2)
April 10, 1985 (50 FR 14115)
32, including 6 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #3)
September 16, 1985 (50 FR 37630)
1 (promulgation of Lansdowne Radiation Site in Pennsylvania, part
of Proposed Rule #3)
September 18, 1985 (50 FR 37950)
41, including 3 Federal facility sites and one reproposed site
(Proposed Rule #4)
Number of Sites
Final




406
410
538
538
540
540
541
541
Proposed
115
160
418
419
140
136
4
248
246
278
277
318
Total
115
160
418
419
546
546
542
786
786
818
818
859
            22

-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
        (continued)
Date
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21054)
170 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1-4; 8 sites
deleted)
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21099)
45, including 2 Federal Facility sites (Proposed Rule #5)
June 10, 1986 (5 1FR 21 109)
proposed RCRA policy; reopening of comment period for
5 sites
January 22, 1987 (52 FR 2492)
64, including 1 Federal facility site (Proposed Rule 16)
February 25, 1987 (52 FR 5578)
Availability of information
May 13, 1987 (52 FR 17991)
proposed RCRA policy for Federal facility sites
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27620)
99 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-6)
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27643)
7 (reproposal of Federal facility sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978)
43 (reproposal of RCRA sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23988)
229, including 14 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #7)
August 9, 1988 (53 FR 30002/30005)
RCRA policy statements
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10512)
(8 Federal facility sites)
and
March 31, 1989 (54 FR 13296)
101 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7;
4 proposed sites dropped)
May 5, 1989 (54 FR 19526)
10 (Proposed Rule #8)
July 14, 1989 (54 FR 29820)
52 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #9)
Number of Sites
Rnal
703
703


802
799*

8903
890
889>
Proposed
185
2482


149
378

273
283
335
Total
888
951


' 951
1,177

1,163
1,173
1,224
            23

-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
        (continued)
Date
August 16, 1989 (54 FR 33846)
2 (proposal of ATSDR sites)
October 4, 1989 (54 FR 41000/41015)
93 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-8; 31 proposed
sites dropped)
October 26, 1989 (54 FR 43778)
25, including 2 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule /CIO, last
proposed rule under original HRS)
November 21, 1989 (54 FR 48184)
29 (promulgation of 27 Federal facility sites from Proposed Rule #9
and 2 ATSDR sites; expansion of 1 Federal facility site)
February 21, 1990 (55 FR 6154)
71 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7, 9;
1 proposed site dropped)
March 14, 1990 (55 FR 9688)
1 (promulgation of United Heckathorn Co., Richmond, California,
part of Proposed Rule #10)
August 30, 1990 (55 FR 35502)
106 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-10; 10
proposed sites dropped)
February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5598)
6 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-7, 10;
14 proposed sites dropped) (last final rule under original HRS)
May 9, 1991 (56 FR 21460)
1 (proposal of ATSDR site)
July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840)
22 (Proposed Rule #11, first proposed rule under revised HRS)
September 25, 1991 (56 FR 48438)
1 (promulgation of ATSDR site)
February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824)
30 (Proposed Rule #12)
October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47181)
33 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #11 and 12); first
final rule under revised HRS
October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47204)
9 (Proposed Rule #13)
Number of Sites
Final
889
9813
981
1,010
1,081
1,082
1.1873
1.1893
1.1883
1,188
1.1853
1.1833
1.2083'4
Proposed
337
213
238
209
137
136
20
0
1
23
22
52
28
Total
1,226
1,194
1,219
1,219
1,218
1,218
1,207
1,189
1,189
1,211
1,207
1,235
1,236
            24

-------
                         FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
                                     (continued)
Date
May 10, 1993 (58 FR 27507)
26 (Proposed Rule #14)
June 23, 1993 (58 FR 34018)
17 (Proposed Rule #15)
January 18, 1994 (59 FR 2568)
26 (Proposed Rule #16)
February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8724)
1 (promulgation of ALCOA (Point Comfort)/Lavaca Bay, Point
Comfort, Texas)
May 31, 1994 (59 FR 27989)
42 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1 1-16)
August 23, 1994 (59 FR 43314)
10 (Proposed Rule #17)
December 16, 1994 (59 FR 65206)
18 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules 12-14, 16 and 17)
February 1995
9 (Proposed Rule #18)
Number of Sites
Final
1.2023-4
1.1993-4
1.1923
1.1914
1.2323
1,232
1.2423
1.2413
Proposed
54
71
97
96
54
64
46
55
Total
1,256
1,270
1,289
1,287
1,286
1,296
1,288
1,296
'No Federal Register notice.
2Silver Creek Tailings, Park City, UT, removed October 17, 1986 as required by CERCLA Section 118(p).
'Reflects site(s) deleted since last rule.
'Reflects site(s) removed since last rule.
                                            25

-------