United States
                            Environmental Protection
                            Agency
 Office of
 Solid Waste and
 Emergency Response
Publication 9360.8-17FS

August 1993
                            Personal Air Sampling and
                            Air  Monitoring Requirements
                            Under 29  CFR 1910.120
         Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
         Emergency Response Division MS-101
                         Quick Reference Fact Sheet
  Background and Purpose
                   Under the authority of Section 126
                   of the Superfund Amendments and
                   Reauthorization  Act   of   1986
                   (SARA Title I), the U.S. .Environ-
                   mental  Protection  Agency (EPA)
                   and the U.S. Occupational Safety
                   and  Health   Administration
  (OSHA) issued identical health and safety standards to
  protect workers engaged in  hazardous waste operations
  and emergency response.   The OSHA  regulations,
  codified  at  29 CFR  1910.120, became effective on
  March 6, 1990 (54 FR 9294).  On April  13, 1990,
  corrections to these regulations were published (55 FR
  14072)   to   clarify   certain   medical  surveillance
  requirements and  to identify  which employers must
  comply  with  29  CFR  1910.120(p).   The  EPA
  regulations,  published on  June 23, 1989, at 54  FR
  26654, incorporate the OSHA standards by reference
  and are codified at 40  CFR Part 311.
     Although  the two  sets  of standards  contain
 identical substantive provisions, the EPA and OSHA
 standards address different audiences. In states that do
 not have an OSHA-approved program, federal OSHA
 standards protect  all private and federal employees
 engaged in hazardous waste operations and emergency
. response; EPA worker proteciioivstandards protect all
 .state and local government employees.  In states that
 do  have  an  OSHA-approved  program,  the state
 program covers all private, state, and local government
 "ernployees; OSHA covers federaj employees.  The
 O'SWER Fact Sheet, Hazardous Waste Operations and
 Emergency Response  (HAZWOPER):'''; Uncontrolled
 Hazardous Waste Sites and  RCRA Corrective Action
 (OSWER Publication 9285.2-08FS, 1991),'provides a
 general overview of the worker protection standards as
 they apply to operations  conducted  at  uncontrolled
 hazardous waste sites.

     P3(HA requirements  for monitoring '£t ^uncon-
 trolled hazardous waste  sites are codified at'29 CFR
 1910.120(h)!   While the  provisions  outlined in this
 section may be interpreted to include the collection of
 samples (i.e., surface wipes  in the support area on a
 lead-contaminated site), the purpose of this Fact Sheet
 is to summarize the HAZWOPER air monitoring and
 sampling aspects  of  these requirements.  The Fact
 Sheet is composed of five parts:  (1) Introduction  to
 Air Monitoring and Air Sampling; (2) Air Monitoring
 Requirements Upon Initial Entry; (3) Air Monitoring
 Requirements After Initial Entry; (4) Conducting Air
 Monitoring and Sampling; and (5) Information Sources
 and Contacts.

 Introduction  to  Air Monitoring and  Air
 Sampling
                 The presence of hazardous mater-
                 ials  at a site, as  well as actions
                 taken to address  these materials,
                 can result in  the release of hazar-
                 dous  substances  into  the  air.
                 Chemical   fires,   transportation
                 accidents,  open  or  leaking con-
                 tainers, wind-blown dust, and site
                 cleanup  activities  all  produce
                 emissions  that  can rapidly affect
                 the health and  safety of response
                 personnel   (site  workers   or
emergency  response)  and  the  public.   Hazardous
atmospheres may be:

•   Explosive (characterized by the presence of
    ignitable or expl6sivervapors, gases, aerosols, and
    dusts);
              - • -1»'         .
•   Toxic/hazardous (characterized  by the presence
    of vapors, gaSes, particulates, and aerosols);

•   Oxygen-deficient (characterized by the
    consumpti6rtcor displacement of oxygen in
    ambienrair); or
         i'
•   Radioactive-(characterized by the  presence of
    radioactive materials).
                                                                             hecyclod/fiocyclable
                                                                             Printed ninth Soy/Canoia Ink on paper thai
                                                                             contains u Mast 50% rccyded fiber

-------
levels since prior monitoring."  Highlight 3 identifies
situations that call for periodic monitoring required at
29 CFR I910.120(h)(3)(i-iv).
                    Highlight 3
           SITUATIONS THAT REQUIRE
             F'ERIODIC MONITORING

       When work begins on a different portion of the
       sue;

       When contaminants other than those previously
       identified are being handled;

       When a different type of operation is initiated
       (e.g., drum opening as opposed to exploratory
       well drilling); or

       When employees are handling leaking drums or
       containers, or working in areas with obvious
       liquid contamination (e.g., a spill or a lagoon).
    Once cleanup  activities begin on-site, 29  CFR
19l0.120(h)(4) requires employers to "monitor  those
employees likely to  have the highest  exposures  to
hazardous substances and health hazards  likely  to be
present above permissible exposure limits or published
exposure levels by using personal sampling frequently
enough to  characterize employee exposures."   Air
sampling  for high-risk  employees is performed  to
identify the  "worst-case exposure." If the worst-case
exposure is above the PEL, then monitoring should be
conducted to identify all employees likely  to be above
those limits.  (Note:  It  is not required  to  monitor
employees engaged in site characterization operations
covered under 29 CFR I910.120(c). Appropriate PPE
based upon  the preliminary evaluation is required.)

    Post-initial entry situations that require  periodic
monitoring   also  should  be  characterized   by  air
sampling, as appropriate, and should be determined by
a  competent health and  safety  professional.   Air
sampling  information can  be  compared   to  the  air
monitoring data for the same period  of time  to:  (1)
illustrate trends in the accuracy of the air monitoring
data;  (2) develop a correlation to the air monitoring
readings; and (3) develop better air monitoring action
guidelines.  Air monitoring data may also be  used  to
determine\vHen further sampling is needed (i.e.,  if site
conditions liave changed).
    Personal .sampling  generally  is   noi   used   to
characterize overall site  air quality.   However,  air
sampling conducted in areas of high concentration may
assist in determining  whether persona!  sampling is
necessary.  Air  sampling  may  also  assist On-Scenc
Coordinators  (OSCs),  Remedial Project Managers
(RPMs), or other site managers in determining whether
chemical  contaminants  covered  under 29  CFR
1910.1000, Subpart Z,  need to be monitored.

    An   air   sampling  strategy outlined   in   the
site-specific  health  and  safety  plan   must   address
frequency  and  type  of  air  monitoring,   personal
monitoring,  and environmental  sampling (29  CFR
1910.120(b)(4)(ii)(E)). Highlight 4 identifies additional
information that  should  be  provided  in area  and
personnel air sampling strategies.
                    Highlight 4
    EXAMPLES OF ELEMENTS TO INCLUDE IN
        AN AREA AIR SAMPLING STRATEGY

       The locations where air sampling will be
       performed;

       The hazardous substances thai will be sampled
       during the task;

       The duration of the sample;

       The equipment that will be used to sample for
       the different hazardous substances;  and

       Collection of meteorological data.

    EXAMPLES OF ELEMENTS TO INCLUDE IN
     A PERSONNEL AIR SAMPLING STRATEGY

       Employee sampled;

       Tasks performed;

       Duration;

       Hazardous substances; and

       Equipment to be used.
                                                      4 •

-------
 Conducting Air Monitoring
                  Table  1  at the  end  of this Fact
                  Sheet,    "Summary   of   Direct-
                  Reading  Air  Monitoring Instru-
                  ments,"  lists  the  direct-reading
                  instruments (DRls) used during air
                  monitoring   to   characterize
                  hazardous atmospheres. DRIs may
 he used  to  rapidly detect  flammable  or explosive
 atmospheres,  oxygen deficiency,  certain  gases  and
 vapors, and ionizing radiation. DRls are the primary
 tools of initial site characterization. The information
 provided  by DRls can be  used to:  select appropriate
 protective measures such  as  personal  protective
 equipment, evacuation,  and other similar measures;
 determine the most  appropriate equipment for further
 monitoring; and assist in  developing optimum sampling
 and analytical protocols.

    DRls have limitations.  For example, the Flame
 lonization  Detector  (FID)  and   Photoionization
 Detector (PID) are commonly used at hazardous waste
 sites  to monitor  for a  broad range of  organics and
 some inorganics.  However,  they do not detect some
 particularly toxic agents  such as hydrogen cyanide and
 hydrogen  .sulfide.   Thus,  these  devices  must  be
 supplemented with  other  methods of detection  (e.g.,
 electrochemical  sensors  or  colorometric  indicator
 tubes).  Many DRIs designed to detect one particular
 substance  may also detect   other  (cross sensitive)
 substances, thus rendering a  "false positive." All DRI
 information should be interpreted with a certain degree
 of caution.
    To characterize personal exposure, air monitoring
should be  performed in the breathing  zone of the
individual.   Emission sources may be characterized
through head-space monitoring (e.g. drums) or close-
range monitoring, if this can be done safely.  Emission
source  measurements  are   not   representative  of
personal  exposure.

    Air  monitoring  instruments  should  be  field-
calibrated on a daily basis prior to the initial entry
and/or any  field  activity.   Calibration   must  be
performed  according  to  manufacturer's  instructions.
Field calibration should take place in field atmospheric
conditions in a "clean" area, such as the command ptjst.
Calibration  must-be  documented, either  in" *a "site
logbook,  or  a logbook  designated  for  instrument
calibration  records as required in the site safety plan
(29 CFR 1910.I20(b)(4)(ii)(E)).

    Air monitoring data should be documented in the
individual's field or the site logbook.   Observations
pertaining  to the  monitoring  data  (i.e.,  weather
conditions,  drum label information, activity performed
 during monitoring, number/names of individuals being
 monitored,  etc.)  should  be   recorded  with  the
 monitoring data.
 Conducting Air Sampling
                  Table 2 at the end  of  this  Fact
                  Sheet,  "Common  Air  Sampling
                  Methods  and Media  Used by the
                  EPA/ERT,"   summarizes   some
                  sampling  methods commonly used
                  on hazardous waste sites. Personal
                  air sampling is generally performed
 using a personal sampling pump capable of both low-
 flow  (20-750  cc/min)  and   high-flow  (]-4  L/min)
 operation.   Low-flow operation with various media-
 packed tubes  is  used  to  sample volatile organic
 materials and acid gas mists. High-flow operation with
 various filter media  or bubbler/impinger solutions is
 generally used to sample particles, paniculate aerosols,
 and  inorganic   gases.    Personal air  sampling  is
 performed   for   the duration  of  the  workshift.
 Employees with  the  highest  exposure potential wear
 the sampling pumps with the sample media positioned
 on their shoulders and the inlet of the filter or tube
 facing down toward  the chest. (Applying protective
 "covers" often eases'  decontamination of the pumps.)
 Personal air sampling results are generally compared to
 the 8-hour  PEL-TWA.

    Sampling for comparison to the PEL-Short-Term
 Exposure   (PEL-STEL)  will  require   collecting  a
 15-minute sample at higher flow rates. PEL-STEL and
 PEL-C sampling may be run throughout the workshift
 alongside the PEL-TWA sampling.  PEL-STEL and
 PEL-C sampling may be performed once every hour
 throughout  the  workshift,  at the times of highest
 potential exposure.  Judgment should be used when
 identifying  times of  highest   potential exposure and
 performing a PEL-STEL and/or PEL-C sampling event
 simultaneously during this high-risk exposure period.
    There are a number of references that list standard
methods for performing personal air sampling. OSHA
and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health (N1OSH) publish two sets of the most widely
used persona] air sampling methods, Both NIOSH.and
OSHA methods are "recipes" for performinj^mljLair
sampling and 'chemical analysis. The methods qutline
the sampling device, collection media, and flow rate at
which to set the sampling device.  OSHA and NIOSH
usually include  in the methods any interferences that
may  bias  the  sampling.  The  EPA/Environmental
Response  Team (EPA/ERT) has developed standard
sampling methods that incorporate existing NIOSH and
OSHA methods. The "Information Sources" section of

-------
this  Fact  Sheet  identifies sources to  obtain  more
information on these methods.

    Before a sampling method is chosen, the laboratory
should  be contacted to  determine  whether  it can
perform   the   desired   analysis.    The  EPA/ERT
recommends using  laboratories  accredited  by the
American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) for
performing analysis on personal air samples.  A list of
AIHA-accredited laboratories  may be obtained  by
contacting the AIHA (see the "Contacts" section of this
Fact Sheet for AIHA's address and phone number).
                                      As with DRIs, sampling pumps must be calibrated
                                   prior to use.  The  goal  of calibrating  the personal
                                   sampling pump is to set, and ensure that the pump can
                                   maintain, a known flow  rate.  Calibration  requires a
                                   pump, a sampling train  (including the sample media
                                   and all connecting tubing), and a primary standard-flow
                                   indicator, such as a  bubble meter  (Buck  calibrator/
                                   Gillibrator), or an inverted burct with bubble mixture.
                                   A  secondary  standard  flow indicator, such  as  a
                                   rotameter, may be used to calibrate  the pump as long
                                   as  the  secondary  standard has   been   previously
                                   calibrated to a primary standard. Highlight 5 illustrates
                                   several different methods of calibration.
                                                Highlight 5
                                EXAMPLES OF CALIBRATION METHODS
     Calibrating a Rotameter with a.
            Bubble Meter
              Sampftng
                Pump
                Calibrating a Personal Sampling
                   Pump with a Bubble Meter
Calibrating a Personal Sampling
    Pump with a Rotameter
                                                                  PcraoraJ S*mp*nQ
                                                                      Pump
                                            Calibration Apparatus

                                         TUbing
                                        ' NOM: u««d tar Standard T«mocrtlur« Frmm n uurimuta*
Sourw:
                              (NtOSH, 19*4. Pub No. 84-100)
                                                            Edtan)

-------
               Highlight 6
EXAMPLES OF PERTINENT INFORMATION
  FOR AIR SAMPLING DOCUMENTATION

  Name of employee sampled;

  Task  performed during sampling period;

  Suspected hazardous substances;

  Level of PPE:

  Type  of collection media;

  Flow  rale of the calibrated pump (pre- and
  post-sampling event);

  Duration of the sample;

  Dale  of sampling event;

  Location of sampling event;

  Environmental  conditions during sampling event
  (e.g.,  temperature, Rh, wind speed, etc.);

  Unique sample number;

  Volume of air sampled during event;

  Any special handling requirements; and

  Analytical holding times.
    Documentation  of  all aspects  of  the  sampling/
monitoring event is critical for both air monitoring and
air sampling. Documentation provides information for
data interpretation and, in the  case of air samples, for
tracking  the sample  from the sample  taker  to  the
laboratory.   Air  sampling  documentation  is  more
formalized than documentation  for air monitoring.
Highlight 6 identifies pertinent information that must
be documented for air sampling.

    If sampling  media (tubes  or  filters)  are changed
throughout  the  day to prevent overloading, sample-
duration  for that media must be noted. Judgment must
be used in deciding how to document such a sampling
event.  Each tube/filter may be designated a  unique
number and treated as a single sample, or each tube/
filter may be designated the sample number  with  a
different  consecutive letter  of the alphabet attached.
The tubes or filters  are unique, but  together  they
represent one complete workshift sample. Setting up
and  performing  personal  air  sampling  generally
requires  more preparation time than air monitoring;
however,  in  both  cases,  the  correct instrument or
sampling  train  must  be chosen, the instrument or
sampling train must be calibrated, and the monitoring
or sampling event  must  be observed.

-------
                                                               TABLE 1
                         SUMMARY OF DIRECT-READING AIR MONITORING INSTRUMENTS
   Principle of
    Detection
 and Monitoring
      Need
                      Instrument
                                                         Features
                                                                                                            Limitations
Wheatstone
Hridgc Filament
    Monitoring
    Need:
    Combusllblr
    Gas
Combustible
Ga.s
Indicator
*  Calibrated to pentanc. hcxane. or methane

*  Nonspecific  detector for combustible pases
   measures gas concentrations as a percentage of
   lower explosive limit (LEL)

4  Lightweight, portable, and easy to use

4  Visual and audible alarms
   (some models)

4  Probe provides remote sensing capabilities

4  8- to 12-hour battery operating life for most
   models

4  Accuracy varies depending upon Ihe model;
   accuracies of t 2 lo 3 percent arc attainable
4  Potential interferences or filament damage from
   leaded gasoline, silicones. and silicates, which
   arc more strongly adsorbed on catalyst than
   oxygen or gas in question.  Membranes arc
   available to minimize these effects.

4  Mosl models do not measure specific gases

4  May not function properly in oxygen-deficient
   atmospheres (< 10 percent)
Chemical Cell
    Monitoring
    Need:
    Oxygen
    Deficiency
Oxygen
Meter
4   Direct readout in percent oxygen
4   Visual and audible alarms
4   Lightweight, portable, and easy to use
4   Probe provides remote sensing capabilities
4   Accuracies of i 1 percent arc attainable, but
    depend on the particular model
4   Generally 8- to 10-hour battery life
4   High humidity may cause interference

4   Strong oxidants may cause artificially high
    readout

4   Oxygen calibrations are dependent on altitude
    and barometric pressure

4   CO2 "poisons" detector cell
Chemical Sensor
Wheaistone
Bridge Filament
    Moniiorvig
    Need:
    Combustible
    Gas/Oxygen
    Deficiency
Combination
Oxygen
Meter and
Combustible
Gas
Indicator
4   Calibrated to pcntane, hcxane, or methane
4   Measure percent oxygen and gas concentration as
    a percentage of LEL
4   Both visual and audible alarms (some models)
4   Remote sensing capabilities
4   Lightweight, portable, and easy to use
4   Accuracies of i 2 percent are attainable'
4   Same limitation as oxygen meters and
    combustible gas detectors
4   In certain units, acid gases and high CO;
    concentrations shorten the life of oxygen
    sensor/cells
4   Certain units require a conversion factor for
    true specific compound response readings
4   In certain units, oxygen calibration  is altitude
    dependent
Optical, Electrical,
Piezoelectric
    Monitoring
    Need:
    Aerosol/
    Particular
Aerosol/
Paniculate
Monitor
4   Selectable ranges

4   Panicle size differentiation available

4   Certain units have data logging capabilities
4   Factory recalibralion required on certain units

4   Values represent total particulales:  dust, mist,
    aerosols are all inclusive with no differentiation

4   Cold weather may have adverse effect on
    detector

4   High humidity and precipitation  negatively
    affect meter response
   Manufacturer specifications. Actual field use may yield greater variations.

                                                                    8

-------
                                                           TABLE 1 (CONPD)
                            SUMMARY  OF DIRECT-READING AIR MONITORING INSTRUMENTS
      Principle of
       Detection
    and Monitoring
         Need
 Instrument
                                                            Features
                                                                                        Limitations
   Photoionization
   Ultraviolet Light
      Monitoring
      Need:
      Toxic Gay
      Vapors
Photo-
ionization
Detector
(PID)"
4   Nonspecific gas and vapor detection for organics
    and some inorganics

*   Not recommended for permanent gases

4   Lightweight (4 to 9 Ibs) and portable
                   Sensitive to 0.1 ppm benzene.  Sensitivity is
                   related to ionization potential of compound
*   Does not monitor lor specific gases or vapors

4   Cannot detect hydrogen cyanide or methane

*   Cannot detect some chlorinated organics

*   High humidity and precipitation negatively
    affect meter response

•   Readings relative to calibration standard
                                       •   Remote sensing capabilities

                                       *   Response time of 90 percent in less than 3
                                           seconds

                                       4   More sensitive to aromatics and unsaturatcd
                                           compounds that the flame ionization detector
                                           (FID)

                                       •   8-hour  battery operating life; certain units with
                                           external interchangeable battery packs

                                       4   Audible alarm is available
                                       4   Certain units have data  logging/computer interface
                                           capabilities

                                       4   Certain units available with calibration libraries
                                           Certain units available with interchangeable lamps
   Hydrogen Flame
   Ionization
      Monitoring
      Need:
      Toxic Gas/
      Vapors
Flame
Ionization
Detector
(FID)
4   In the survey mode, it functions as a nonspecific
    total hydrocarbon analyzer; in the gas
    chromatograph mode, it provides tentative
    qualitative/quantitative identification (OVA-
    specific)

4   Most sensitive to saturated hydrocarbons, alkanes,
    and unsaturaied hydrocarbon alkanes

4   Lightweight (12 Ibs) and portable

4   Remote sensing probe is available

4   Response time is 90 percent in
    2 seconds

4   8-hour battery operating life

4   Sounds audible alarm when predetermined levels
    are exceeded
4   Not suitable for inorganic gases (e.g., Cl,, HCN,
    NH,)

4   Less sensitive  to aromatics and unsaturated
    compounds than PID

4   Requires skilled technicians to operate the
    equipment in the GC mode and to analyze the
    results (OVA-specific)

4   Requires changes of columns and gas supply
    when operated in the GC (gas chromatography)
    mode in certain units (OVA-spccific)

4   Because specific chemical standards and
    calibration columns are needed, the operator
    must have some idea of the identification of the
    gas/vapor (OVA-specific)

4   Substances that contain substituted functional
    groups (e.g., hydroxide (OH-) or (CI-) chloride
    groups) reduce the detector's sensitivity
     UV sources vary in strength among available units (10.2ev, 10.6ev, 11.7ev). Each source has a range of compounds it cannot detect based upon
ionization potentials.  See manufacturer's literature for specifics.
                                                                     -9

-------
                                                         TABLE 1 (CONPD)
                         SUMMARY OF DIRECT-READING AIR  MONITORING INSTRUMENTS
   Principle of
    Deicclion
  and  Monitoring
      Need
 Instrument
                                                         Fealure-s
                                                                                                            Limitations
Infrared Radiation
   Monitoring
   Need:
   Toxic Gas,'
   Vapors
                     Infrared
                     Analyzer
                   Overcomes the limits of most infrared (IK)
                   analyzers by use of a variable filler; can be used to
                   scan through a portion of the spectrum to
                   measure concentration of several gases or can be
                   set at a particular wavelength to measure a
                   specific gas
                   Delects both organic and inorganic gases
                   Portable but not as lightweight
                   (32 Ibs.) a.s the PIDs or FID.s
                                                     4   Less portable (nan other methods of pa.vvapor
                                                         detection

                                                     4   Requires skilled technicians to operate and
                                                         analyze results when positive identification is
                                                         nceded

                                                     *   Interference by water vapor and carbon dioxide

                                                     *   Most require AC power source

                                                     *   Positive identification requires comparison of
                                                         spectrum from slnp chart recorder with
                                                         published adsorption spectrum: infrared
                                                         spectrum not available  for all compounds

                                                     *   Intrinsic safely is unil dependent; set-
                                                         manufacturer's  literature
Chemical
Reaction
Producing a Color
Change
   Monitoring
   Need:
   Toxic Gas/
   Vapors
Indicalor
Tubes
*  Quantitative accuracies are variable
4  Simple to use, and relatively inexpensive
*  Real limc/semi-rcal time results
*   Low accuracy
*   Subject to leakage during pumping
*   Requires previous knowledge of gases/vapors in
    order to select the appropnale detector lube

*   Some chemicals interfere with color reaction to
    read false positive

*   Temperature and humidity may affect readings
Electrochemical
Cell
   Monitoring
   Need:
   Toxic Gas,'
   Vapors
   Specific
   Atmospheres
Toxic
Atmosphere
Monitor
   Ease of operation
   Small, compact, lightweight
   Audible alarm upon exceeding prc-sct action level
   or Threshold Limit Value (TLV)
   Certain units have digital readout
   Generally compound-specific
   Certain units interface with data logger
*   Cross sensitivity
*   Slow response/recovery after exposure to high
    contamination levels
4   Limited number of chemicals delected
Metal-Oxide
Semiconductor
   Monitoring
   Need:
   Toxic Gas/
   Vapors
Toxic
Atmosphere
Monitor
*   Ease of operation
*   Small, compact, lightweight
*   Audible alarm upon exceeding present action level
    or TLV

4   Certain units have digital readout
4   Certain units interface wilh data logger
4   Nonspecific gas and vapor detection for some
    organics and inorganics
4   Cross sensitivity
4   Slow response/recovery after exposure to high
    contamination levels
                                                                 - 10

-------
                                                        TABLE  1  (CONPD)
                          SUMMARY OF DIRECT-READING  AIR MONITORING INSTRUMENTS
     Principle of
      Detection
   and Monitoring
        Need
 Instrument
                                   Features
                                                                                                          Limitations
  Scintillation
  Detector
     Monitoring
     Need:
     Radiation
Radiation
Meters
*  Measures radiation in R/hr or fractions thereof
   (gamma)
   (battery operated)
4  Probe provides remote sensing capabilities
*  Accuracy and sensitivity varies considerably with
   manufacturer and type of meter
4  A variety of meters are available.  Some measure
   total ionizing radiation; others are specific for
   gamma, alpha, or a combination of two or more
   types
Some meters do not determine type of radiation
                                                                                        NOTE:   Initial entry surveys should focus on the
                                                                                                 presence of gamma radiation.  If alpha or
                                                                                                 beta are suspected, consult your health
                                                                                                 physicist.
  Gold Film Sensor
     Monitoring
     .Need-
     Mercury
     Vapor
                      Mercury
                      Vapor
                      Analyzer
               4   Compound specific; has survey and sample modes
               4   0.001 mg/nr1 detection limit
               4   Provides sensor saturation readout; saturated
                   sensor cleaning capabilities
               4   Can be used with dosimeters for on-site dosimctry
               4   Microprocessor serves reading; automatically re-
                                                   4  Requires yearly factory recalibration
                                                   4  Short battery life
                                                   4  Requires AC power for Heal Cleaning Cycle
                                        zeros
                                        Certain units have data logging capabilities
                                        5-hour batterv life
Sources: Mathamel, 1981; Spittler, 1980;  McEnery, 1982; National Mine Service Company,  1980; Gas-Tech, 1980; Enmet Corporation,
1979; Foxboro Analytical, 1982; HNU Systems,  1982,  1991; Photovac International, Inc.,  1989; Jerome, 1990; MIE, 1990.
                                                                  11

-------
                                                          TABLE 2
                     COMMON AIR SAMPLING METHODS AND MEDIA USED BY EPA/ERT'
CONTAMINANT
Hydrocarbons:
DP 36-126 Dcg. C
Aromatic
Halogcnated
Inorganic Acids
Alcohols
Acetic Acid
Acetaldchydc
Aliphatic Amines
Aromatic Amine-s
Volatile Organic
Compounds
Volatile Organic
Compounds
Polynuclear Aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAH)
PAH
Peslicidc/PCBs
Dioxin"
Metals
Formaldehyde
Formaldehyde
AIR SAMPLING
METHODS
NIOSH 1500
NJOSH 1501
NIOSH 1003
N1OSH 7903
NIOSH 1402
NIOSH 1603
NIOSH 2538
NIOSH 2010
NIOSH 2002
EPA TO1 and TO2
EPA TO 14
NIOSH 5515
NIOSH 5506
Lewis and McCleod,
Modified
EPA T04
EPA TO9
NIOSH 7300
NIOSH 3500
NIOSH 2541
FLOW RATE
1 L/m
1 Urn
1 Urn
1 L/m
0.5 L/m
1 L/m
1 L/m
1 L/m
1 L/m
20 cc/m
Grab 10-50 cc/m
2.5 L/m or 5 L/m
260 L/m
3.5 L/m
260 L/m
3 L/m
I L/m
0.1 L/m
COLLECTION MEDIA
Charcoal
Silica Gel
Charcoal
Charcoal
2-Hydroxymethyl (2-HMP)
Piperidine on XAD-2 Resin
Silica Gel
Silica Gel
Tenax/Carbon Molecular Sieve
(CMS)
Summa Canister
Summa Canister with Critical
Orifice
XAD-2 Resin Tube with 37 mm
2 urn TeflonR Filter with
Polytetrafluorocthylenc (PTFE) O-
Ring Support
2"x 1" Polyurethane Foam (PUF)
with 50 grams XAD Resin
2" x 3" PUF with Glass Fiber Filler
2" x 3" PUF and Glass Fiber Filler
0.8 urn Mixed Cellulose Ester
Filler (MCEF)
1 um PTFE Filter and 2 Impingers,
Each with 20 ml of 1 percent
Sodium Bisulfite Solution
10 percent 2-HMP on XAD-2
Resin
SAMPLE
DURATION
(HOURS)
2-S
2-8
2-8
2-8
2-8
8
8
1-2
Grab, 4-12
2-8
8-12
2-8
72
2-8
2-8
4-8
1  This table is to be considered a guideline only.  NIOSH methods were developed for indoor industrial use.  Most NIOSH methods cited here
  have modified flow rales for use in ouidoor ambient conditions.  Sample duration should reflect extent of work shift when used in personal
  monitoring.  If area sampling is being conducted for site characterisation, sample durations may need  to be modified to achieve desired
  detection limits.

•  For dioxin. method is for area sampling only.

  Note: OSHA analytical methods should also be evaluated for appropriate, applicable use. Most arc available on OSHA's Computerized
  Information System (OCIS).
                                                              12

-------
Information Sources

Federal Regulations

  The OSHA HAZWOPER regulations arc codified at 29 CFR 1910.120 (54 FR 9294 and 55 FR 14072). Subpari
  Z, Toxic and Hazardous Substances, can be found at 29 CFR 1910.1000.

  The EPA HAZWOPER regulations are codified at 40 CFR 311  (54 FR 26654).

Computer Software

  Air Methods Database (EPA/Environmental Response Team, Edison, NJ).

     Available on the Cleanup Information electronic bulletin board (CLU-IN), formerly OSWER BBS.  For
     further information, call (301) 589-8366.  Communications: No Parity, 8 Databits, 1 Stopbit, F Duplex.

  EPA Health and Safety Planner: Software and User's Guide (EPA, OSWER Publication 9285.8-01, 1990).

Fact Sheets

  Hazardous  Waste  Operations and Emergency Response: General Information  and Comparison (EPA, OSWER
  Publication 9285.2-09FS, 1991).
     Explains the scope and purpose of the HAZWOPER standards, and distinguishes the SARA Title I standards
     from regulations and consensus standards covering the same or similar subject matter.

  Hazardous  Waste  Operations and Emergency Response: Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites and RCRA
  Corrective Action  (EPA, OSWER Publication  9285.2-08FS, 1991).

     Explains the principle HAZWOPER requirements as they apply to employees engaged in hazardous waste
     operations and  emergency response at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites, including employees who perform
     corrective actions at RCRA TSD facilities.

  Hazardous  Waste  Operations and Emergency Response: RCRA  TSD and Emergency Response Without Regard
  to Location (EPA, OSWER Publication 9285.2-07FS, 1991).

     Describes the HAZWOPER planning, training, and medical surveillance requirements as they apply to
     emergency responders regardless of location, and employees who perform routine hazardous waste operations
     at RCRA TSD  facilities.

  Establishing Work Zones at Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites (EPA, OSWER Publication 9285.2-06FS,
  1991).

     Defines  the different work zones usually found at a hazardous waste site (i.e., Exclusion, Contamination
     Reduction, and Support) and provides information on selecting and maintaining work zones.

  Hazardous  Waste  Operations and Emergency Response: Available Guidance (EPA, OSWER Publication 9285.2-
  10FS, 1993).

     Provides a list and description of computer  software, fact sheets, guidance documents, and ERT training
     programs that pertain to the worker protection standards.

General Health and Safety Guidance Documents

  Standard Operating Safety Guides  (EPA, OSWER Publication 9285.1-03, 1992).

     Provide guidelines for use by any organization in developing specific operation safety  procedures. These
     Guides should be adapted to address the safety criteria required for protection of response personnel from
     the hazards created by a specific operation or incident.
                                                  13

-------
  Standard Operating Procedures for Air Sampling and Monitoring at Emergency Responses (EPA, OSWER
  Publication 9285.2-03A, draft).
     Describes the types and methods of air surveillance, procedures and equipment for air monitoring, and a
     method for analyzing organic solvents by gas chromatography.

  Standard Operating Procedures for Site Safety Planning (EPA,  OSWER Publication 9285.2-05, being updated).

     Describes the general  requirements for a site safety plan, discusses development and implementation of a site
     safety plan, and provides sample plans and a checklist.

  Occupational Safety and  Health Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Site Activities (N1OSH/OSHA/
  USCG/EPA, N10SH Publication 85-115, GPO No. 017-033-00419-6, 1985).

  Draft International Document on Guide to Portable Instruments for Assessing Airborne Pollutants Arising from
  Hazardous Wastes (U.S.  National Working Group (NWG-4 OIML) Pilot Secretariat PS-17: "Measuremenl of
  Pollution."  Reporting Secretariat RS-5: "Measurement of Hazardous Waste Pollution."  ISBN: 0-936712-75-9).
     Provides guidance for  using portable instruments to assess airborne  pollutants arising from hazardous waste.

  Procedures for Conducting Air Pathway Analyses for Superfund Applications addresses a variety of issues
  relevant to the air impacts at Superfund sites in four volumes entitled:
     Volume I:  Application  of Air Pathway Analyses for Superfund Applications (EPA, EPA-450/1-89-001, NT1S
     PB90 113374/AS, 1989).
     Volume II: Estimation of Baseline Air Emissions at  Superfund Sites (EPA, EPA-450/1-89-002, NT1S  PB89
     18053/AS, 1989).
     Volume 111: Estimation of Air Emissions from Clean-up Activities at Superfund Sites (EPA, EPA-450/1-89-003,
     NT1S PB89 180061/AS, 1989).
     Volume IV: Procedures for Dispersion Modeling and Air Monitoring for Superfund Air Pathway Analysis (EPA,
     EPA-450/1-89-004, NT1S  PB90 113382/AS,  1989).

Standard Air Sampling Method Documentation

  OSHA Analytical Methods.  The OSHA Technical Center maintains an updated data base of analytical testing
  methods. Printouts  of analytical methods for individual chemicals are available  by request. For more
  information about the data base, contact:

     OSHA Technical Center
     1781 South 300 West
     Salt Lake City, UT 84115
     (801) 487-0521

  Occupational Exposure Sampling Strategy Manual (Leidel, N.A., K.A.  Busch, and J.R. Lynch. U.S. Departmeni
  of Health, Education, and Welfare, Publ.(NIOSH) pp. 77-173, 1979).

  Manual of Analytical Methods (Volumes 1-3, 3rd Ed.,  with supplements) (NIOSH Publication 89-127, 1989).

Recommended Exposure  Limit Documentation

  1991-1992 Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure
  Indices (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists,  1991).

  Guide to Occupational Exposure Values-1992 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists,
  1991).

  NIOSH Pocket Guide to  Chemical Hazards  (NIOSH Publication 90-117, updated annually).

                                                 •  14

-------
Contacts
The following contacts can provide additional information on air monitoring and air sampling at uncontrolled
hazardous waste sites:
American Industrial Hygiene
Association (AIHA)
Washington, D.C.
2700 Prosperity Avenue
Suite 250
Fairfax, Virginia 22031
(703) 849-8888
U.S. EPA
Environmental Response Team
2890 Woodbridge Avenue,
Building 18 (MS-101)
Edison, NJ  08837-3679
(908) 321-6740
24-Hour Hotline: (908) 321-6660
OSHA
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, NW
Room N-3647
Washington DC 20210
(202) 219-8036

OSHA Notification Service
(Complaint Hotline) for Emergency
Situations: 1-800-321-6742
                                      EPA REGIONAL OFFICES
   EPA Region  1
   Emergency Planning and Response Branch
   60 Westview Street
   Lexington, MA 02173
   (617) 860-4367

   EPA Region 2
   Response and Prevention Branch
   2890 Woodbridge Avenue, Raritan Depot
   Building 209
   Edison, NJ 08837
   (908)321-6656

   EPA Region 3
   Superfund Removal Branch
   841 Chestnut Street, 9th Floor
   Philadelphia, PA  19107
   (215) 597-0992

   EPA Region 4
   Emergency Response and Removal Branch
   345 Courtland Street, NE
   1st Floor
   Atlanta,  GA  30365
   (404) 347-3931

   EPA Region 5
   Emergency and Enforcement Response Branch
   77 West Jackson  Boulevard
   Chicago, IL 60604
   (312) 353-9295
                   EPA Region 6
                   Emergency Response Branch
                   1145 Ross Avenue, 9th Floor
                   Dallas, TX 75202-2733
                   (214) 655-2270

                   EPA Region 7
                   Emergency Planning and Response Branch
                   25 Funston Road,  2nd Floor
                   Kansas City,  KS 66115
                   (913) 551-5037

                   EPA Region 8
                   Emergency Response Branch
                   999 18th Street, Suite 500
                   Denver, CO  80202-2405
                   (303) 924-7129

                   EPA Region 9
                   Field Operations Branch
                   75 Hawthorne Street
                   San Francisco, CA 94105
                   (415) 744-2353   '

                   EPA Region 10
                   Superfund Branch
                   1200 6th Avenue, llth Floor
                   Seattle, WA  98101
                   (206) 553-1677
                                                 15

-------
                                          OSHA REGIONAL OFFICES
        Region I (CT, MA, ME, NH, Rl, VT)
        133 Portland Street, 1st Floor
        Boston, MA  12114
        (617) 565-7164

        Region 2  (NJ, NY, PR, VI)
        201 Varick Street, Room 670
        New York, NY 10014
        (212) 337-2378

        Region 3   (DC, DE, MD, PA, VA, WV)
        Gateway building, Suite 2100
        3535 Market  Street
        Philadelphia, PA  19104
        (215) 596-1201

        Region 4   (AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN)
        1375 Peachirec Street, N.E.
        Suite 587
        Atlanta, GA  30367
        (404) 347-3573

        Region 5  (IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI)
        230 South Dearborn Street, Room 3244
        Chicago, IL 60604
        (312) 353-2220
Region 6  (AR, LA, NM, OK, TX)
525 Griffin Street, Room 602
Dallas, TX  75202
(214) 767-4731

Region 7   (IA, KS, MO, NE)
911 Walnut Street, Room 406
Kansas City, MO 64106
(816) 426-5861

Region 8   (CO, MT, ND, SD,  UT, WY)
Federal Building, Room  1576
1961 Stout Street
Denver, CO 80294
(303) 844-3061

Region 9  (American  Samoa,  AZ, CA, Guam,
HI, NV, Trust Territories of the  Pacific)
71 Stevenson Street, Room 415
San Francisco; CA  94105
(415) 744-6670

Region 10(AK, ID,  OR,  WA)
1111 Third Avenue, Suite 715
Seattle, WA 98101-3212
(206) 553-5930
&EPA
     United Stales
     Environmental Protection
     Agency
     Washington. DC 20460
     Official Business
     Penalty for Private Use
     S300

-------