430F98089
    &EPA
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation
6202J
Draft
April 1998
           EPA Coalbed Methane Outreach Program Technical Options Series
          USE OF COAL MINE METHANE IN BLAST FURNACES
      Gas injection systems increase the iron-making productivity ot blast furnaces while lowering costs
                        (Photo Courtesy of American Iron and Steel Institute)
POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF INJECTING COAL MINE METHANE IN BLASTFURNACES.
      * Reduces coke usage and improved furnace stability
      * Increases iron-making productivity and reduced operating costs
      * Reduces air pollution from coke
      + Recovery and use of coal mine methane reduces greenhouse gas emissions

-------
   Using coal mine
  methane as fuel,
 rather than venting it
 to the atmosphere,
  reduces methane
      emissions
 Blast furnaces near
gassy coal mines may
 be able to use coal
  mine methane to
offset a portion of their
  natural gas needs
 The cost of coal mine
 methane is often less
  than conventional
     natural gas
 Why Consider Using Coal Mine Methane in Blast Furnaces?

The steel industry uses blast furnaces to transform iron ores into molten iron, which
is later used for steelmaking. Blast furnace operations use  metallurgical coke to
produce most of  the energy required to melt the ore to iron.  Currently, U.S.
steelmakers produce approximately 55  million tons  of molten iron  annually,
requiring about 23 million tons of coke per year.  However, coke is becoming
increasingly expensive since coke production is declining for various  reasons.
Since blast furnaces will continue to be the major process for producing iron in the
United States, the  steel industry is seeking low-capital  options that reduce  coke
consumption, increase productivity, and reduce operating expenses.

All blast  furnaces in North America inject some type of supplemental fuel, such as
natural gas, coke oven gas, oils and tars, or coal to  form additional carbon
monoxide and hydrogen for combustion, and chemical reduction of  iron-bearing
materials into  molten iron. Of these fuels, natural gas and pulverized coal are the
most widely accepted for  injection.   Recent full-scale tests have  shown that
injecting natural gas into blast furnaces at the rate of  6,900 standard cubic feet
per ton  of hot metal (scf/thm) can reduce coke consumption by 30%, and can
increase ironmaking production by 40%. Injecting natural gas, rather than coal or
coke oven  gas, as a supplemental fuel  also reduces NOx  and SOx emissions.
Coal mine methane provides the same benefits as conventional natural gas, and
could easily be substituted for, or mixed with, natural gas for blast furnace use, as
long as  it meets gas quality requirements (it must have a low sulfur content and
contain  at least 94% methane).

In the U.S., several  blast furnaces that currently inject natural gas are located within
approximately 20  miles of gassy  coal mines.  Because most gassy coal  mines
drain less than 10 million cubic feet of methane per  day, they do not produce
enough methane to meet all the  gas requirements of a typical blast furnace, but
one or more gassy mines could produce enough methane to supplement a blast
furnace's gas  needs.  A  preliminary review suggests that a dedicated pipeline
project  delivering  coal mine methane to  a blast furnace is not  likely  to be
economically  viable.  However,  this  review did not take into account  many
variables,  including a steel companys  interest in greenhouse gas  reduction
credits,  locations of existing pipelines with respect to the blast furnaces, and the
potential for innovative strategies for transporting methane from a mine to a blast
furnace. These site-specific conditions could improve the economics of  using
coal mine  methane in blast furnaces. Internationally, there may be additional
opportunities for the use  of  coal mine methane in blast furnaces,  as  in many
countries, large metallurgical industries are located near coal mines.

Several  companies are currently reporting  their  methane  emissions reductions
under the  DOE-sponsored  "Voluntary Reporting  Program"  for  greenhouse gas
emissions.  At present, these emissions reductions do not  have an established
market value.  However, at least  two companies, Niagara Mohawk Power  Corp,
and Suncor Energy Inc., have taken a first step toward the creation of a global
market  and  an  international  trading system  for reductions  in emissions of
greenhouse gases, such  as  methane and carbon dioxide.  Specifically, Suncor
Energy  has agreed  to  purchase greenhouse gas  emission  reductions from
Niagara Mohawk.   Steel companies wishing to participate in a  greenhouse gas
emissions reduction program may wish to use coal  mine methane to offset a
portion of their fuel needs.

-------
               IRON
              BEARING
              BURDEN
                FLUX
                FUEL
          Iron Ore      615lb
          Fluxed Sinter  2484 Ib
          Scrap       197 Ib
          Limestone
          Gravel
15lb
15lb
          Coke
      BLAST
Air      44,280 scf  3277 Ib
Moisture    670 scf   32 Ib
      FUEL
             Natural Gas  962 scf   41 Ib
                             TOP GAS 63,500 SCF
                             MOISTURE 3,300 SCF
                             DUST
                                                                SLAG      418lb
                                                                HOT METAL 2000 Ib
   Schematic of a typical blast furnace injecting natural gas (962 scf per ton of hot metal)
The process places iron ore, coke and other fluxing substances into the furnace top (upper left
diagram) while blowing  a blast of hot air enriched with natural gas into the furnace bottom
(lower left). The coke generates gases that reduce the ore, creating molten iron and slag (lower
right). The process also produces blast furnace gas, or "top gas" (upper right) that is suitable for
use in the furnace stoves or elsewhere in the plant.
  Comparison of Differing Levels of Gas Injection at a  Blast Furnace
                      (Project at Acme Steel Company in Chicago)
-
Metal production (tons/day)
Coke cost ($/THM)
Natural gas cost ($/THM)
Oxygen Cost ($/THM))
Iron Ore Pellets ($/THM)
Total Cost ($/THM)
Cost Savings ($/Day)
Increased Production ($/Day)
Total Benefits ($/Day)
Material Costs: Coke -$11 5/ton;
No Gas
Injection
2,589
$59,00
$0
$0
$57.80
$117.00
—

-
1 780 scf gas per
ton of hot metal
2,918
$52.00
$3.80
$0.10
$57.60
$113.50
$10,740
$32,900
$43,460
Natural gas - $2,20/mcf; Oxygen -
3340 scf gas per 5800 scf gas per
ton of hot metal ton of hot metal
3.124! 3,452
$48.00
$7.50
$41,00
$12.60
$2.60 ! $4,90
$57.70
115.80
$4,280
$53,500
$57,780
$57.70
$116.20
$2,420
$86,300
$88,720
$35/ton; Ore pellets - $38/ton
Abbreviations: scf - standard cubic feet; THM - tons of hot metal; mcf - thousand cubic feet
All data derived from Gas Research Institute Report, "Natural Gas Injection in Blast Furnaces"

-------
 For More Information.
 Rapidly changing environmental regulations and market conditions are creating new
 opportunities for distribution and use of coal mine methane.  Blast furnaces are a
 high-volume gas consumer that could benefit from using coal mine methane to
 meet a portion of their fuel needs. The use of coal mine methane, like conventional
 natural gas, reduces coke consumption, and therefore NOx, SOx, and CO2 emissions.
 In addition to these benefits,  the use of coal mine methane reduces methane
 emissions.

 To obtain more information about using natural gas in blast furnaces, contact:

 Dave Smith
 Program Team Leader
 Industrial Business Unit
 Gas Research Institute
 8600 West Bryn Mawr Avenue
 Chicago, IL 60631-3562
 Telephone: (773) 399-5471
 Fax:       (773)399-8170

 To obtain information about blast furnace operations, contact:

 William A. Obenchain
 Manager, Manufacturing and Technology
 American Iron and Steel Institute
 1101 -17th Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20036-4700
 Telephone: (202) 452-7208
      Fax:   (202) 463-6573
Or contact EPA's Coalbed Methane Outreach  Program for information about this and
other profitable uses for coal mine methane:
 Coalbed Methane Outreach Program
 U.S. EPA (6202J)
 401 M Street, SW
 Washington, DC  20460 USA
      (202) 564-9468 or 564-9481
 Fax: (202)565-2077
 e-mail: fernandez.roger@epamail.epa.gov
        schultz.karl@epamail.epa.gov

        http://www.epa.gov/coalbed
C  O  A  L  B
METHANE
OUTREACH
P  R O C  R  A  M
 The mention of products or services in this case study does not constitute an endorsement by EPA.

-------