FEDERAL REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES ROUNDTABLE
 REMEDIATION CASE STUDIES AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORTS FACT SHEET
              The Federal  Remediation  Technologies
              Roundtable (FRTR) is an interagency working
              group that promotes cooperation among
              member agencies to further the development
              and use of new technologies for  improved
              remediation  of  hazardous waste  sites.
              Primary members of the FRTR include the
              U.S.  Department of Defense (DoD), the
              U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the U.S.
              Department of the Interior (DOI),  the National
              Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
              and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
              (EPA).   A  major activity of the Roundtable
              is collection and  distribution of information
              from federal and  state agencies on the use
              of new technology at their sites.  Each year,
              the Roundtable compiles reports and  makes
              them available at the Web site www.frtr.gov.
              This fact sheet describes the status of cost and
              performance information on the web site and
              the new reports that were added  for the spring
              2007 update. A total of 756  case studies
              are now available with this recent addition
              of 38  new reports.
              Figure 1  shows the variety  of information
              available on  the FRTR homepage.   Figure
              2 illustrates access  to the four categories
                                   FIGURE 1: INFORMATION ON FRTR HOMEPAGE
               Search: Search the FRTR Web site for information.
               FRTR Meetings: Obtain information on upcoming FRTR Meetings and
               download summaries and presentations from previous meetings.
               Screening Tools: Use screening matrices to evaluate technologies for
               characterizing and treating hazardous waste sites and for decision support.
               Technology Cost and Performance: View and download case studies
               on remediation/characterization technologies and technojogy assessment reports
               as well as access web sites on technology cost analysis.
               Remediation Optimization: View and download case studies and
               guidance information on monitoring and remediation technology optimization.
               Environmental Cost Engineering: Obtain information on tools and
               reference documents for cost estimation of environmental projects.
               Publications: View and download abstracts and publications issued under
               the auspices of the FRTR.	
               Information Links: Access web sites of other FRTR members.
 GOVERNMENT'S EFFORTS TO


 PROMOTE INTERAGENCY

        tederal
 COOPERATION TO ADVANCE THE USE

^MoMV Technologies  w\J_^/^
 OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES TO


 CLEAN UP HAZARDOUS WASTE


 CONTAMINATION
                              http://www.frtr.gov

-------
  IGHLIGf
NEW REMEDIATION CA
Palmerton Zinc Pile, Compost/Biosolids Application
          to Revegetate Defoliated Areas
 his  report summarizes  a rull-scale  phytoremediation
project that was  implemented at the Palmerton  Zinc
Pile  Superfund Site in  Palmerton,  Carbon County,
Pennsylvania.  Previous  zinc smelting operations had
created an area of more than 2,000 acres of defoliated
land on the adjacent Blue Mountain, a cinder bank
composed of 33 million tons of material that contained
leachable  metals, and  additional defoliation along
Stoney Ridge.  The surface  soil, groundwater,  and
stream sediments at the site  and surrounding areas
had  been contaminated  by heavy metals as a result.
The treatment technology to address the heavy metal
contamination involved revegetation  of the  defoliated
areas using  ime, potash,  sludge, and fly ash to support
the new plantings.  Through mid-2006, about  1,300
acres of Blue Mountain, 220 acres of the cinder bank,
and 40 acres of Stoney Ridge have been revegetated.
Additional  revegetation of Blue Mountain and  Stoney
Ridge is planned for the  remainder of 2006  and
in  2007.   Results  of the  phytoremediation project
have  stabilized treated  areas,  reduced soi erosion,
and  improved water quality (decreased contaminant
concentrations of soluble  metals) associated with runoff
of remediation  reports,  including  cost  and
performance  case  studies for  soi   and
groundwater treatment technologies at specific
sites; broad assessments of these technologies
based on  their use at multiple sites;  case
studies of innovative site characterization and
monitoring  technologies;  and case  studies  of
various optimization efforts.

REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY COST
AND PERFORMANCE CASE STUDIES
Ten new cost  and  performance case studies
for remediation (treatment or containment)
technologies are being added.   These case
studies primarily involve  in situ processes for
treating chlorinated solvents in groundwater and
technologies for treating metals from mining and
smelting  operations. Most of the chlorinated
so vent  projects were prepared by  DoD's
Environmental Security Technology Certification
Program (ESTCP).   One study  involves
bioaugmentation,  where a microbia culture
was able to successfully  induce degradation.
Other projects  involve  creation of a reactive
zone — in one case using permeable electrodes
to produce  oxidizing and reducing conditions,
and in another case to test the use of cottonwood
trees  to intercept and  treat  groundwater
contaminated with trichloroethylene.  Another
project  documents ongoing  work by the
State  of  Florida  to  remediate a  dry cleaning
facility using aggressive source zone treatment
consisting of in situ chemical oxidation (Fenton's
                               FIGURE 2: REMEDIATION REPORTS
                                    FRTR Remediation Case Study Searchable Database:
                                    A database of groundwater and soil treatment applications which
                                    can be searched by several criteria; Standardized abstracts are
                                    provided along with links to the full reports. (Total: 393 reports)
                                    Remediation Technology Assessment Reports:
                                    A compilation of reports assessing treatment technologies based on
                                    their use at numerous sites. (Total: 78 reports)
                                    Site Characterization And Monitoring Technologies:
                                    A collection of reports documenting experiences in the use of
                                    innovative site characterization and monitoring technologies; Report
                                    summaries are organized by category with links to the full reports.
                                    (Total: 175 reports)
                                    Optimization Case Studies: A database of site application results
                                    for various techniques to improve remedy efficiency; Searches using
                                    various criteria produce report summaries with links to the full reports.
                                    (Total: 110 reports)
                              http://www.frtr.gov

-------
chemistry).  The  remaining projects address metal
contamination. An EPA report from a Superfund site
demonstrates  how a constructed wetland was able
to reduce metals  to concentrations below maximum
contaminant levels (MCL).  Other Superfund projects
at smelting sites demonstrate aggressive revegetation
to control migration of metals and the potential for
permeable  reactive barriers using zero-valent iron
to control arsenic.  Two EPA Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) projects demonstrated
use of a compost-free bioreactor and of a semi-passive
alkaline lagoon to treat acid mine drainage.  Finally,
an ESTCP project demonstrated the successful use of
a proprietary  product (derived from processing fish
bones) to stabilize lead in situ.
The abstracts for all of the new reports are available
in the eleventh volume of Abstracts of Remediation
Case Studies (542-R-07-004), which is available for
download  only at the FRTR Web site.  Past volumes
of Abstracts of Remediation  Case Studies are also
available at the Web  site to download or order.

SITE CHARACTERIZATION AND MONITORING
REPORTS
This focus area includes reports on field-based site
characterization and  monitoring technologies.  Of
the 1 1  new  reports added,  one actually consists
of a collection of eight reports for individual field-
portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometers
vendors.   This report by the SITE program is  a
comparative demonstration of the XRF instruments for
the analysis of trace metals. This demonstration was
designed to collect reiable data on  performance
and cost for commercially available XRF instruments
and to document the relative performance of each.
The objective of  the eva uation  was to evaluate
each XRF instrument's accuracy, precision,  sample
throughput,  and tendency for matrix effects. This field
demonstration involved analysis of prepared samples
of soi and sediment, which included blends from nine
different collection sites as well as spiked  samples
with certified element concentrations. Accuracy was
assessed by comparing the  XRF instrument's results
with data generated by a fixed reference laboratory.
The SITE program also produced an evaluation of a
rapid dioxin assay that can be used as an effective
screening tool to  identify areas  of greatest concern
for cleanup  and to limit the number of more expensive
analysis.
Several reports  from the Interstate  Technology
& Regulatory Council (ITRC) are  included.  Two
          CHARACTERIZATION REPORTS
    Vapor Intrusion Pathway: A Practical Guide
      Vapor Intrusion Pathway: Investigative
        Approaches for Typical Scenarios

               "™   The Interstate Technology
                      Regulatory
mcil (ITRC)
                       as released two auiaance
                              Approaches for
                           >'   Typical Scenarios.
                              The first document
                              (Vapor  ntrusion
   Pathway: A Practical Guide)  provides a 1 3-step
   approach to investigate vapor intrusion and to
   determine whether any remediation is warranted.
   The second document (Vapor Intrusion Pathway:
   Investigative Approaches for Typical Scenarios)
   provides six hypothetical scenarios for a vapor
   intrusion investigation. The six scenarios include:
   (1) a  gas station  in  a residential  neighborhood;
   (2) a dry cleaner in a strip  mall adjacent  to a
   neighborhood; (3) a large industrial facility with a
   long plume under several hundred buildings;  (4) a
   vacant lot with proposed Brownfield development
   over a  ground water plume;  (5) a vacant large
   commercial building with warehouse space and
   office space; and (6) an apartment building with
   a parking garage over a ground water plume.
documents address vapor intrusion.  One  of these
documents provides an  overview and  a procedure
for conducting an investigation to determine whether
remediation  is warranted.   A companion document
provides six hypothetical scenarios to illustrate application
of the procedures.  Two ITRC  reports cover passive
samplers that are  primarily intended  for  groundwater
monitoring, but many  can also be used for surface
                               http://www.frtr.gov

-------
water and vapor sampling.  Twelve technologies
are discussed in terms of operation, applications,
advantages  and limitations,  and status.   Another
report provides protocols for five of these groundwater
samplers, along with case histories of their use.  In
addition, an  ITRC report describes technologies that
have been combined for real-time measurement of
radionuclides in  soi. Five case studies are provided
where the technologies  have been applied and
conclusions are  given concerning their  use.  Three
reports from the  ESTCP include a survey of munitions
response technologies with illustrations on evaluating
and  selecting characterization  technologies for
unexploded  ordnance based on site  conditions;
demonstration of an innovative  analytical  assay
technology that detects bioavailable ferric  iron; and
a demonstration that shows the cost effectiveness of
a single-well  push-pull test for evaluating the potential
for in situ aerobic  cometabolism.  Finally, an EPA
case study is included on use  of the Triad approach
to unravel complex contaminant distribution patterns
and support  expedited site characterization.

LONG-TERM  MONITORING  AND
OPTIMIZATION CASE STUDY REPORTS
New documents added in this area include reports
from  ITRC and  EPA on process optimization and
EPA  reports on  monitoring optimization.   The ITRC
is preparing  a series of reports on remedial process
optimization  topics. The first deals with life cycle cost
analysis, which considers all project costs as the basis
for comparison of alternatives.  Another provides an
overview of performance-based management, which
focuses on accelerating the achievement of desired
results or remedial action objectives. Another report
discusses data  management, data analysis, and
visualization  techniques.   This report covers useful
techniques  for  extracting  information  to support
analysis from existing and newly collected data. EPA
refers to  its process optimization  as Remedial Site
Evaluation, and three reports are included that illustrate
its application.  These reports include optimization
of an existing soil vapor extraction  and in-well air
stripping system, and two pump-and-treat systems that
also  involve  recovery of free  product.  In  addition,
three EPA case studies concern optimization of long-
term monitoring networks through both spatial (sample
location)  and temporal (sample frequency) statistical
analysis.  One of these projects uses statistical tools
available with  the Monitoring  and Remediation
Optimization System software (MAROS).
HIGHLIGHT OF REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY
           ASSESSMENT REPORTS

  Cost and Performance Review of Electrical
Resistance Heating (ERH) for Source Treatment
  In Situ Thermal Treatment Design Document

The  U.S.  Navy and  the USAGE  have each
released a document on evaluating and se ecting
in situ thermal treatment technologies.  The U.S.
Navy has released Cost and Performance Review
of Electrical Resistance Heating (ERH) for Source
Treatment, which presents information on five ERH
cost  and performance projects.  These projects
focus on the treatment of dense nonaqueous-
phase liquid (DNAPL) contamination at a variety
of Department of Defense (DoD) facilities.  The
USAGE  has released In Situ  Thermal Treatment
Design Document,  a guidance  document that
provides information on screening and selecting
the appropriate in situ thermal  remediation
technologies.   Technologies evaluated in  this
document include  steam-enhanced  extraction
injection, electrical resistivity heating, and thermal
conductive heating. Background information and
technology descriptions are provided along with
cost and performance information.
                               http://www.frtr.gov

-------
REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORTS
The reports in this section provide technology assessments based on results from field experience gained from
multiple sites.  Two new reports provide valuable information about in situ thermal treatment.  The U.S. Army
Corp of Engineers (USAGE) has produced a design manual to support eva uation and selection of the major
thermal options, including steam-enhanced extraction, electrical resistance heating, and thermal  conductive
heating.  The manual provides information on the proper application of the technologies and helps identify
design, operational, and monitoring issues.  The Navy has published a report focusing on electrical resistance
heating that includes five cost and performance case studies from applications at  naval facilities. The results from
these projects show this technology to be effective for treating dense nonaqueous phase iquids (DNAPL).  The
ITRC has published a document on post-closure care of municipal sold waste landfills.  Although it is focused
on municipal waste, the  report also has information that could be useful for management of hazardous wastes.
The ITRC also produced a document on ecological land reuse.  Case studies  are provided to document the
integration of natural or  green technologies and to illustrate the  resulting benefits.  An EPA fact sheet on soil
amendments for site remediation and reuse provides a reference matrix that describes the potential application
of organic waste streams to revitalize areas that have been stressed from activities such as mining.  It is based
on essons learned from extensive site-specific experience. Two additional EPA reports are contaminant-specific
assessments of available and emerging technologies for treating  1,4-dioxane and mercury.  The final report is
from ESTCP and the U.S. Geological Survey and provides a draft protocol for characterizing natural  attenuation
of chlorinated solvents in groundwater plumes that discharge  to wetlands.  This  document is based on a
previous report and presents alternatives for developing the site conceptual model and field methodologies for
characterizing the natural attenuation process.
   REMEDIATION CASE STUDIES AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORTS - ORDERING INFORMATION
       The following FRTR documents are available free of charge from the U.S. EPA/National Service
       Center for  Environmental Publications (NSCEP), while supplies last. To order, mail a request to:

       U.S. EPA/National Service Center for Environmental Publications
       P.O. Box 42419
       Cincinnati, OH 45242

       Or FAX to (513) 489-8695. In addition, telephone orders may be placed at (800) 490-9198 or
       (513)489-8190.

    a Abstracts of Remediation Case Studies, Volume 1 1, August 2007 (EPA-542-R-07-004)
       [Downloadable only at www.frfr.gov].

    Q Remediation Case Studies & Technology Assessment Reports Fact Sheet, June 2007
       (EPA-542-F-07-002).

    Q Remediation Technology Assessment Reports: Summary of Selected Documents, August 2005
       (EPA-542-F-05-006).  '

    Q Guide to Documenting  and Managing Cost and Performance Information for Remediation
       Projects, Revised Version, October 1998  (EPA-542-B-98-007).
                               http://www.frtr.gov

-------
\
Ul
                     Office of Solid Waste and
                     Emergency Response
                     (5203P)
National Service Center for
Environmental Publications
RO. Box42419
Cincinnati, OH 45242

Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
EPA-542-F-07-002
June 2007
www.epa.gov
www.frtr.gov
            Federal
          Remediation
          Technologies
           Roundtable
                          Remediation
                         Case Studies
                       and Technology
                          Assessment
                             Reports
                              Fact Sheet
                              June 2007

-------