3)
  \
Tl
 o
                          /A newsletter about soil, sediment, and ground-water characterization and remediation technologies
                       Issue 32

TTn's M's-we o/ Technology News and Trends highlights site remediation involving in-situ
application of heat or electrical current to treat soil or ground water containing volatile
organic compounds (VrOCs), including non-aqueous phase liquid. These projects demon-
strate significant cost and time savings gained over conventional remedies such as soil
excavation or ground-water pumpingwith limited aboveground treatment, and suggest methods
to address common difficulties such as treatment of heterogeneous contaminant sources or
verification of system performance.

            Innovative E-Barrier Controls Ground-Water Plume
                          of Energetic Compounds
                                                                                September 2007
  Demonstration of an emerging technology
  known as the electrolytic reactive barrier
  (e-barrier) is underway at the Pueblo
  Chemical Depot near Pueblo, CO. This
  technology combines the principles of
  electrochemistry with those of permeable
  reactive barriers to manage ground-water
  plumes contaminated with chlorinated
  solvents or energetic compounds. Under
  the  federal  Environmental Security
  Technology Certification  Program
  (ESTCP), evaluation of the Depot's
  e-barrier focuses on  its performance in
  treating RDX, TNT, and 2,4-DNT in ground
  water and on the relationships between the
  system's power requirements  and
  performance. Efforts to reduce electricity
  costs for powering this already low-energy
  treatment method are enhanced by an off-
  grid solar photovoltaic (PV) system.

  Environmental restoration at the Pueblo
  Chemical Depot was initiated in 1988 after
  closure  of the  base under  the Base
  Realignment  and Closure Program. The
  demonstration site encompasses a fonner
  munitions washout facility where unlined
  holding ponds leached RDX, HMX, TNT,
  2,4-DNT, 1,3,5-TNB, ammonium, and
  nitrate into ground water. The source was
  partially excavated in 1997-1998 and
  contaminated  soil  was  composted;
  however, concentrations  of energetic
  compounds in ground water remained
                         high. Source concentrations in the
                         treatment zone average 35 ug/L for RDX
                         and 5 ug/L for 2,4-DNT. Based on site-
                         specific  condtions, the State of Colorado
                         set cleanup goals at 0.55  ug/L for RDX
                         and 0.0885 ug/L for 2,4-DNT.

                         The contaminant plume resides within an
                         alluvial sand and silt matrix with a saturated
                         thickness of about 3 feet, underlain at 12
                         feet by a shale aquitard with ground-water
                         flow rates averaging 6 in/day. The plume
                         extends  approximately  two  miles
                         downgradient from the source area. To
                         address  high concentrations of RDX in
                         off-site irrigation wells, a pump and treat
                         system  employing granular activated
                         carbon and ion exchange has operated at
                         the Depot since 2001.

                         An  e-barrier consists of closely spaced
                         mesh titanium electrodes mounted to rigid,
                         non-conductive sheet piling. The barrier is
                         installed vertically to  intercept the
                         contaminated plume and functions as a
                         penneable reactive barrier (Figure 1). Low-
                         voltage  direct  current is applied to the
                         electrodes to drive  electrochemical
                         oxidation of contaminants at the anode and
                         reduction of contaminants at the cathode.
                         DC/DC  converters allow adjustment of
                         voltage to optimize treatment. Depending on
                         target contaminants, the e-barrier can be

                                          [continued on page 2]
                                                                            Contents
 Innovative E-Barrier
 Controls Ground-Water
 Plume of Energetic
 Compounds           page 1

 Three-Phase System
 Improves ERH Control
 in Removing Source-
 Area VOCs            page 2

 Steam Injections
 Combined with SVE
 Accelerate Cleanup of
 Brownfield            page 4

 ERH Removes VOC
 Contaminants Under
 Cold and Low-
 Permeability
 Conditions            page 5
     CLU-IN Resources
CLU-IN's "Technology Focus"
(http://cluin.org/techfocus/)
provides guidance, cost and
performance reports, and case
studies on in-situ thermal
technologies such as electrical
resistance heating, hot-air
injections, hot-water injections,
steam injections, radio-
frequency heating, thermal
conduction, and vitrification.
Similar material is available for
ex-situ technologies such  as
thermal desorption, hot-gas
decontamination, plasma high-
temperature recovery, pyrolysis,
and thermal off-gas treatment.
                                                                                               Recycled/Recyclable
                                                                                               Printed with Soy/Canola Ink on paper that
                                                                                               contains at least 50% recycled fiber

-------
[continued from page 1]

operated in either a sequential oxidation-
reduction  mode   or  sequential
reduction-oxidation mode. Multiple
sequences  may be employed to
completely degrade target contaminants
and any intermediate compounds.

The Depot  e-barrier comprises 15
individual electrode modules mounted to
commercially available vinyl sheet pile.
Conventional cranes were used to load
each 2-ft by 8-ft section of electrode
mesh-covered sheet piling into the 4-ft
e-barrier trench.  Once emplaced,
modules  were  linked  to  form a
continuous barrier with an estimated
ground-water residence  time of eight
hours in the vicinity of the electrodes.
The trench was backfilled with clean,
coarse sand obtained from a local quarry.

PV panels are used to power die system
due to the Pueblo area's high solar-energy
rating, averaging 4.5 kWh/mVday. A
single 2-kW, non-tracking PV  array
equipped with storage batteries provides
sufficient  power to  operate all of the
system modules.  Though  energy
consumption varies according to applied
voltage, current operation of the e-barrier
at an applied potential of 5.3 V results in
an energy demand of 500 W.

Treatment began in March 2006. Tests
using applied voltages of 2.3,3.3, and 4.3
V are complete, and testing of 5.3 V
began in June 2007. Performance is
monitored at 26 monitoring wells
located up- and downgradient from the e-
barrier.  To date, degradation of RDX
 Mesh Electrodes
                             Solar Power Supply
                             and Controller



•^^™ Ground-water Flow
"" Dfesolvwl Cowamifngt...i
Contaminant Plume 	 Saur.ce.2oiw.--
I
                                                   Figure 1. Completion
                                                   the natural gradient
                                                   of contaminated
                                                   ground water.
has ranged from 70% at 4.3 V to 40% at
2.3 V, with  no apparent formation or
accumulation of known intermediates.
Similar rates of 2,4-DNT and TNT
transformation to  compounds more
thermodynamically amenable to treatment
have been observed,  supporting previous
experiments that found treatment efficacy
directly relates to applied potential.

Results suggest that a threshold of 5 V is
needed to optimize reactions within the e-
barrier while avoiding undesired reactions.
Extreme redox conditions (pe and pH)
developing at electrode  surfaces,  even at
low voltages, potentially cause formation
of precipitates on electrode surfaces.
Although this problem may not occur at
sites with more favorable ground-water
geochemistry, it was resolved at the Depot
by reversing polarity for one hour each
day using a programmable logic controller.

A remote data-acquisition system collects
electrical data  such  as  current and
electrode potentials at  15-minute
intervals.  In addition,  cellular modem
connection provides real-time monitoring
of the electrical system and access to
its data logger.
Project costs are estimated at $24/ft2
for installation and $1,200 for each
e-barrier module, for which a 20-year
lifespan is estimated. Project results
will be detailed  in a future cost
and performance summary. Pending
final results of the demonstration
and funding availability,  full-scale
operations involving  additional
transects at the  Depot  may  begin
in 2009.  Earlier demonstration of
e-barrier prototypes at  Warren Air
Force Base (see cost and  performance
summary  at  www.estcp.org)  and
Canadian Forces Base Borden showed
that simple reversal or shifting of
electrode  polarity  allows  the
technology to treat chlorinated solvent
plumes.

Contributed by David Gilbert,
Ph.D. (gilbert&engr.colostate.edit or
970-491-8880) and Tom Sale, Ph.D.,
Colorado State University
ftsale&.engr.colostate.edu or
970-491-8413),  and Chris Pulskamp,
Pueblo  Chemical Depot
(Christopher.Pulskamp(q:i:us.army.mil
or 719-549-4252)
              Three-Phase System Improves ERH Control in Removing Source-Area VOCs
The U.S. Navy increasingly uses three-
phase electrical resistance heating
(ERH)  to  remove  VOCs  from
contaminant source areas on Navy
facilities. One site is the Naval Station
(NS)-Annapolis, MD, where ERH was
conducted in 2006 in a portion of the
area known as "Site 1." As part  of a
CERCLA  interim removal action, the
primary objective of ERH application
was 95% removal of bulk contaminants
in source-area soil to reduce potential for
contaminant migration to ground water.
After ERH system shutdown, the volume
of VOC mass removed by the system
more than doubled the amount originally
targeted.

Site 1 covers 39 acres along the north shore
of the Severn River and  directly across
from the U.S. Naval Academy. From 1944
until 1973, the site was used for metal
storage and salvaging  operations. The
Navy commissary/exchange building and
parking areas currently occupy the site's
northwestern portion, and the remainder
is primarily wooded. The ERH treatment
area is located directly  behind the
commissary and exchange building's
loading dock.
              [continued on page 3]

-------
[continued from page 2]

A 1988 site investigation identified
elevated concentrations of VOCs in
ground water, likely resulting from past
metal salvaging. Contamination consisted
primarily of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
(TeCA) and trichloroethene (TCE) at
concentrations reaching 45,000 ug/L and
2,800 ug/L, respectively. Subsequent
investigations identified a 150- by 110-
foot  vadose-zone   source   area
extending in soil from a depth of 10
feet below ground surface (bgs) to
65 feet bgs. Studies showed no direct
exposure to contaminated soil in the
source area, which now is covered
with asphalt or grass.

Remedial alternatives for subsurface soil
included ERH. soil vapor extraction
(SVE), and excavation. Life-cycle costs
for ERH and SVE were comparable, but
SVE was projected to require up to seven
years of operation to remove the target
VOC volume, and ERH was estimated
to remove the same amount in less than
one year. Soil excavation was not a viable
cost option  due  to  the depth  of
contamination.  To optimize capital and
operating costs, extensive sampling was
conducted to fully delineate the treatment
area and determine the minimum number
of electrodes needed.

ERH technology promotes contaminant
volatilization through a combination
of  steam  stripping  and   in-situ
degradation that removes dissolved-
phase contaminants. Its performance
relies on critical spacing of electrodes
for heating the subsurface while
targeting contaminant depths and
concentrations. At NS-Annapolis,
electrodes were placed in vadose- and
saturated-zone VOC recovery wells.
Each electrode boring included a co-
located vapor recovery well. Instead of
using  sand to backfill around the
electrodes, as in conventional well
installations, an electrically conductive
material (graphite) was emplaced in the
wells at target depths. Unnecessary heat
conductance and associated electricity
costs  at  the periphery,   where
contamination was shallow, were
minimized through use of shorter spans
of graphite. Five temperature-monitoring
points were used to measure temperatures
at 5-ft intervals from 5 ft to 75 ft bgs.

Two drilling methods were needed to
install wells to  a target depth of 72 feet.
An air rotary rig drilled through sand, silt,
clay, and a 10-foot iron layer to reach the
saturated zone located 60 feet bgs. A
hollow-stem auger was used to preserve
integrity of the well walls during drilling
of the remaining  12 feet and  for
electrode placement.

The  system   includes   24   steel
electrodes,  a  conventional-electricity
power control unit  (PCU), a steam
condenser,  granular activated carbon
(GAC) filters, and an SVE blower.
Electrodes were installed in a triangular
grid for three-phase, instead of more
common six-phase, heating  to achieve
more  uniform  heating  of   the
subsurface.  All  portions  of  the
electrodes were installed underground
to avoid interference with ongoing
site activities.

Soil vapors and contaminant-laden
steam were transported through the
combined electrode/recovery wells to the
system's aboveground condenser, where
soil vapors  and VOCs were separated
from steam. Resulting condensate was
recycled in the condenser  system as
supplemental cooling water. Air  and
VOC vapors passed from the condenser
through GAC filters to the SVE blower
for  atmospheric discharge. Emission
tests during  the heating process
showed  no  VOC  concentrations
exceeding air standards.

The selected PCU allowed manual and
fully remote computer-based control of
the  ERH system, which required 100-
amp, 13.8 kV power to apply 2,000 kW
of electricity to the source area. Current
was applied to the subsurface for  116
days in February-May 2006. Subsurface
temperatures averaged 99°C throughout
the   heating   process,  reaching a
maximum of 107°C. Pre-treatment tests
suggested  a  target  temperature of
100°C.
Operations were suspended only
once early in the project to address
blower noise  affecting a nearby
residential neighborhood. Addition of
a muffler to the inlet and outlet lines
of  the  blower  achieved a 75%
reduction in noise,  and operations
resumed four days later.

Daily measurement of VOC concentrations
in vapor streams  of  the condenser's
outlet indicated a total VOC volume of
1,800 pounds was removed  from  soil
over the course of treatment. This volume
significantly exceeded a pretreatment
estimate of approximately 850  Ibs,
showing higher than  anticipated ERH
performance as well as  under-estimate of
the original volume.

Ground-water sampling was conducted
before system operation, immediately
after system shutdown, and at  three-
and six-month intervals after shutdown.
At the three-month  interval,  some
contaminant rebound was observed
in the  treatment area, and TCE
concentrations in downgradient wells
exceeded pretreatment measurements.
These  concentrations  decreased
significantly by the next  round of
sampling. Six-month sampling indicated
total VOC concentrations in the well
closest to the treatment area decreased
at least one order of  magnitude, with
TeCA and TCE concentrations falling

              [continued on page 4]
         Call for Abstracts
  The U.S. EPA Office of Superfund
  Remediation and Technology
  Innovation and the Environmental
  Institute/University of Massachusetts
  Amherst are co-sponsoring a
  conference on Triad Investigations:
  New Approaches and Innovative
  Strategies on June 10-13, 2008, in
  Amherst, MA. Abstracts for platform
  or poster presentations must be
  submitted by November 1, 2007.
  Visit http://www.umass.edu/tei/
  conferences/triad.html for more
  information.

-------
      [continued from page 3]
      to levels below 10 ug/L and 1,500
      ug/L, respectively.

      Over the course of active heating, the
      system's electricity consumption totaled
1,710,726 kW-hrs. Electricity costs
comprised 19% of the $1.7M total
project cost, including installation and
operation. Soil sampling to verify ERH
results will occur next year following
complete cooling of the subsurface.
Contributed by Jennifer Melton, U.S.
Navy (Jennifer, melton&.navy. mil or
202-685-3275)
                     Steam Injections Combined with SVE Accelerate Cleanup of Brownfield
      The Port of Ridgefield in Washington
      is   conducting   steam-enhanced
      remediation (SER) as an interim/
      emergency action to remove a ground-
      water contaminant source and control
      migration of a free-phase plume into
      the Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge
      of the Columbia  River basin. The
      treatment area comprises four acres of
      the Port's 41 -acre Lake River Industrial
      Park, a brownfield requiring restoration
      before mixed-use redevelopment.  In
      cooperation  with  the  State  of
      Washington Department of Ecology,
      the Port estimated that cleanup using
      conventional ground-water pumping
      and aboveground treatment (P&T)
      would take up to 90 years. Early results
      of SER/SVE treatment confirmed that
      significant reductions in cleanup
      duration could be achieved through
      technologies other than P&T. During
      the initial year of its application,
      alone, SER/SVE technology removed
      the  same volume  of subsurface
      contaminants expected to be removed
      by P&T in 6.5 years.

      Pacific Wood Treating Corporation
      treated wood for  approximately  30
      years on  this  Port-owned property
      located approximately 10 miles north
      of Vancouver. Chemicals used during
      wood-treating included creosote,
      pentachlorophenol, and water-borne
      solutions containing copper, chromium,
      and arsenic. These chemicals were
      released to the soil and ground water
      and eventually threatened to migrate to
      Carty Lake, now part of the wildlife
      refuge. Investigations indicate that the
      site's shallow (20 ftbgs) ground water
      contains  a plume with more  than
      100,000  gallons of free-phase
      chemicals. Soil in this area consists
      of a 50-ft  layer of fine to course sand
and cobbles  overlaying a cemented
gravel aquitard.

SER implementation began in 2004 with
an initial phase to start hydraulic control
of the plume containing semivolatile
organic compounds, begin mass removal,
optimize the SER system, and fine-tune
a  design for expanded  operation.
Treatment targeted a one-acre area with
initially one injection well; later during this
initial phase, five more injection wells
were  added. Each  well  received
continuous steam injection over  an
average  of 180 days, at an average rate
of 2,000 Ibs/lir. Performance information
helped  adjust well spacing  during
subsequent full-scale  installation and
detennine an  energy consumption goal
of 500 kW-hr/m3 for each cubic meter
of soil treated. Approximately 4,700
gallons of nonaqueous-phase liquid
(NAPL) were  removed during the initial
phase.

In 2006, the full-scale SER system was
installed and operations began to treat four
areas sequentially. Current objectives are
to remove NAPL,  the contaminant
source, and mobile contaminants from
both soil and ground water. Based  on
first-phase results, the expanded system
generally maintains a 2:1 ratio between
the amount of ground water extracted
and the amount of cold-water equivalent
of steam  injected. Each injection is
designed to apply approximately four
pore volumes  of steam.

The system employs 51 injection wells
(spaced  86 ft apart) and 40  vapor/
ground-water extraction wells (spaced
50 ft  apart)  in addition to  the pilot
project's 17 combined ground-water and
vapor extraction wells. The 4-inch-
diameter steel injection and extraction
wells have 10-ft and 35-ft screens,
respectively. Each well is grouted in
place with a mixture of silica flour and
Portland cement to provide a good well
seal and prevent  steam escape at the
surface.

The system includes a 100-gpm liquid
treatment system  and 1,500-scf vapor
treatment system housed in a 100-
by  100-ft  aboveground  facility.
Treatment of extracted liquid involves
sequential use of two parallel  heat
exchangers, two parallel bulk oil/water
separators, coagulation/flocculation
units,  an inclined plate clarifier, two
parallel mixed media filtration skids, and
three GAC beds. Extracted vapors are
treated in a separate treatment train using
a "fin-fan"  heat exchanger, air/liquid
separators such as knockout pots, air
dryers, and two steam-regenenerated
GAC  systems. Treated liquids  are
discharged into Lake River, an adjacent
tributary of the Columbia River under
an NPDES permit.

Full-scale enhancements included use of
hammerhead airlift pumps rather than
progressive cavity pumps for better
maintenance of hydraulic control during
extraction and ease of in-field repair;
other pumping methods failed due to heat
build-up and associated chemical
reactions. To increase the  rate of
removing light NAPL, a second vacuum
system was added, whereby 1-inch
flexible "slurping" tubing is used to draw
liquids off the ground-water surface.

Full-scale operations began in January
2006 to address the 4-acre treatment
zone  in 1-acre  increments,  each
employing  8-10  injection  wells
supported by 20-30 extraction wells.
Each well received continuous steam

             [continued on page 5]
4

-------
[continued from page 4]

injection over an average period of 180
days, at an average rate of 2,000 Ibs/hr.
Approximately 60,000 gallons  of
contaminated liquid, averaging  about
120°F upon extraction, were treated at
the water treatment plant each day.
Automated systems allow simultaneous
monitoring by the  Port  and WA
Department of Ecology, which oversees
the cleanup. In contrast to earlier steam-
injection projects based onNAPL removal
from an aquifer, performance monitoring
indicated mat die majority of NAPL floats
on top of the water table.

Treatment in the first 1-acre area was
suspended in June, when approximately
16,600 gallons of NAPL  had been
cumulatively removed. The material was
placed in onsite storage tanks pending
offsite incineration.  Work focus  was
turned to the next 1-acre area in order
to maximize treatment returns on the
NAPL recovery, and begin monitoring of
"polishing"  technologies such as
hydropyrolysis/oxidation and natural
bioremediation.

Cleanup costs are anticipated to total
$48M. Use of the Port's existing steam
generator reduced construction costs,
and operation of the system by in-house
Port personnel significantly reduces
operating costs. Approximately $6M and
three years of system operation also
were saved by installing the complete
well field at one time rather than through
four rounds of field mobilization.
 Steam injection in the second 1-acre
 treatment area began this past July, with
 expected completion in 6-9 months. SER
 across the entire four acres is anticipated
 to be complete by 2013-15. The Port
 has begun assessing risk associated with
 residual  (primarily  non-mobile)
 contamination in the  treatment area as
 part of a current remedial investigation/
 feasibility study.

 Contributed by Brent Grening, Port of
 Ridgefield fbgren ing&portridgefield. org
 or 360-887-3873), Dan Alexanian, WA
 Department of Ecology
 (dale461 (Siecy.wa.gov or 360-407-
 6249), and Ste\>en Taylor, Maul Foster
 & Alongi, Inc. (staylor&mfainc. org or
 360-694-2691)
             ERH Removes VOC Contaminants Under Cold and Low-Permeability Conditions
The U.S. EPA's Region 8 recently
remediated soil and ground water at a
VOC-contaminated site in West Fargo.
ND, using thermally enhanced vapor
extraction relying on ERH technology.
Though the treatment area encompassed
only 10,300 ft2 of a former dry-cleaner
site, an extensive heating system was
required to reach cleanup goals in the
region's cold climate. Remediation was
further challenged by  the presence of
dense  NAPL,  an  extremely   low-
permeability subsurface, and the  site's
location  next  to  residential  and
commercial properties. Acceleration of
this Superfund removal action was
needed to protect the small city's
drinking water source, a municipal well
only one-quarter mile from the site.

Treatment was  designed to  target five
depths ranging  from 0 to 56 ft bgs to
treat a total soil volume of approximately
13,800 yd3. Concentrations of PCE, the
primary  contaminant of concern,
reached 2,200 mg/kg in soil consisting
primarily of clay with goethite infilling
 Figure 2. Rates of contaminant removal
 increased dramatically after additional
 DVE wells began operating at the West
 Fargo site.
between joints and fractures. The highest
PCE concentration in ground water,
encountered at 3-7 ft bgs, was 89 mg/L.
In contrast to a typical conductivity of
200-1,000 uS/cm, ground water at this
site exhibits a natural conductivity ranging
from 8,000  to  12,000  uS/cm.  This
condition required application of extremely
high-current,  low-voltage electricity to
heat the subsurface. Based on site-specific
conditions and the technical practicability
of the thermal technology, cleanup goals
were set at 3 mg/kg PCE in soil and
1 mg/L total VOCs in ground water.
The ERH system included 56 multi-
zone electrode/vent assemblies and an
array  of horizontal vapor extraction
wells. An additional 74 dual vacuum
extraction (DVE) wells were added
midway through the project to augment
contaminant  extraction in  the  low-
penneability clay. Subsurface temperatures
were monitored with 10  temperature-
monitoring piezometers, and nine multi-
level perimeter monitoring wells  were
installed on the site perimeter to evaluate
pre-treatment conditions and monitor any
              [continued on page  6]

-------
                                           Solid Waste and
                                           Emergency Response
                                           (5203P)
                               EPA542-N-06-011
                               September 2007
                               Issue No. 32
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
National Service Center for Environmental Publications
P.O. Box 42419
Cincinnati, OH 45242
            Presorted Standard
            Postage and Fees Paid
            EPA
            Permit No. G-35
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
 [continued from page 5]
 contaminant migration. Extracted vapor
 and condensate  were treated with
 activated carbon. A temporary building
 was constructed to cover the entire area,
 avoiding the need to winterize individual
 components of the treatment system.

 Site construction began in June 2004.
 Active subsurface heating began the
 following March, when average daily
 temperatures rose  to a  high above
 32°F and average monthly snowfall
 dropped to below nine inches. Three
 36,000-amp power supply units
 converted conventional electricity to
 750 kW of power at voltages ranging
 from  70  to 950  V.  The  target
 subsurface  steam temperature of
 100°C was achieved within three
 months  (in May), and  the  system
 operated for an additional six months
 (until  November)  (Figure 2).  The
DVE system continued to operate for
three  more  months  while  the
subsurface cooled.

A total of 5,188 pounds of VOC mass
was removed  within one year after
treatment startup.  Soil and ground-
water sampling upon ERH  shutdown
confirmed target concentrations were
reached at all locations of the treatment
area, except one on the periphery where
contamination was not fully defined.
Some subsidence of clay was observed
during  the treatment process.

Over the course of treatment, a total of
2.8 mW-hrs  of energy was consumed.
Cleanup costs, including site restoration,
totaled approximately $3M.

Contributed by Joyce Ackerman, EPA
Region 8 (ackerman.joyce®,epa.gov
or 303-312-6822)
          Contact Us
    Technology News and Trends
          is on the NET!
     View, download, subscribe,
        and unsubscribe at:
       http://www.epa.gov/tio
     http://cluin.org/newsletters
    Technology News and Trends
    welcomes readers' comments
     and contributions. Address
        correspondence to:

          John Quander

   Office of Superfund Remediation
     and Technology Innovation
             (5203P)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        Ariel Rios Building
     1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
      Washington, DC 20460
        Phone:703-603-7198
        Fax:703-603-9135
Agency does not endorse specific technology vendors.

-------