oEPA
              United States
              Environmental Protection
              Agency
              Office of Water
              Regulations and Standards
              Criteria and Standards Division
              Washington, DC 20460
              Water
Ambient
Water Quality
Criteria
for
EPA 440/5-84-029
January 1985
              Chromium -1984

-------
AMBIENT AQUATIC LIFE WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR

                   CHROMIUM
     U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
      OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
      ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES
               DULUTH, MINNESOTA
          NARRAGANSETT, RHODE ISLAND

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND SUPPORT LABORATORY
               CINCINNATI, OHIO

-------
                                 DISCLAIMER

     This report has been reviewed by che Criteria and Standards  Division,

Office of Water Regulations and Standards, U.S.  Environmental Protection

Agency, and approved for publication.  Mention of trade names or  commercial

products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                             AVAILABILITY NOTICE

     This document is available to the public through the National Technical

Information Service (NTIS),  5285 Port  Royal Road,  Springfield,  VA  22161.
       Kcc.essioio  KivAwxW- -  ^B^S-- 22747 8 -

-------
                                  FOREWORD

     Section 304(a)(l) of the Clean Wacer Act of 1977 (P.L. 95-217) requires
Che Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency co publish criteria
for water quality accurately reflecting che latest scientific knowledge on
che kind and extent of all identifiable effects on health and welfare which
may be expected from the presence of pollutants in any body of wacer,
including ground water.  This document is a revision of proposed criteria
based upon a consideration of comments received from other Federal agencies,
State agencies, special interest groups, and individual scientists.  The
criteria contained in this document replace any previously published EPA
aquatic life criteria.

     The term "water quality criteria" is used in two sections of che Clean
Water Act, section 304(a)(l) and section 303(c)(2).  The term has a different
program impact in each section.  In section 304, che term represents a
non-regulatory, scientific assessment of ecological effects.  The criteria
presented in this publication are such scientific assessments.  Such water
quality criteria associated wich specific stream uses when adopted as State
water quality standards under section 303 become enforceable maximum
acceptable levels of a pollutant in ambient waters.  The water quality
criteria adopted in the State water qualicy scandards could have che same
numerical limics as the criteria developed under section 304.  However, in
many situations States may wane co adjust water quality criteria developed
under section 304 co reflecc local environmental conditions and human
exposure patterns before incorporation into water quality scandards.  It is
not until their adoption as part of the State water quality standards thac
che criceria become regulacory.

     Guidelines co assisc che Scaces in che modificacion of criceria
presenced in chis document, in the development of water quality standards,
and in other water-related programs of chis Agency, have been developed by
EPA.
                                      Edwin L. Johnson
                                      Director
                                      Office of Water Regulacions and Scandards
                                     ill

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Quencin H. Pickering
(freshwater author)
Environmental Monitoring and Support
  Laboratory
Cincinnati, Ohio
John H. Gentile
(saltwater author)
Environmental Research Laboratory
Narragansett, Rhode Island
Charles E. Stephan
(document coordinator)
Environmental Research Laboratory
Duluth, Minnesota
David J. Hansen
(saltwater coordinator)
Environmental Research Laboratory
Narragansett, Rhode Island
Statistical Support:  John W. Rogers

Clerical Support:  Terry L. Highland
                                     IV

-------
                                  CONTENTS




                                                                         Page




Foreword	    iii




Acknowledgments  	     iv




Tables	     vi








Introduction 	      1




Acute Toxicity to Aquatic Animals   	      5




Chronic Toxicity to Aquatic Animals   	     10




Toxicity to Aquatic Plants	     13




Bioaccumulation  	     14




Other Data . .	     15




Unused Data	     16




Summary	     IS




National Criteria	     19








References	     68

-------
                                   TABLES




                                                                         Page




1.  Acuce Toxic icy of Chromium Co Aquacic Animals	    23




2,  Chronic Toxicicy of Chromium co Aquacic Animals   	    39




3.  Ranked Genus Mean Acuce Values wich Species Mean  Acuce-Chronic




    Racios	    43




4.  Toxicicy of Chromium co Aquacic Planes	    51




5.  Bioaccumulacion of Chromium by Aquacic Organisms  	    54




6.  Ocher Daca on Effects of Chromium on Aquacic Organisms	    55
                                     VI

-------
Increduction*

     Significant quantities of chromium(III) or chroraium(VI) or both exist in

various bodies of water, and either can be converted to the other under

appropriate natural conditions (Callahan, et al. 1979; Jan and Young, 1978;

Smillie, et al. 1981).  Because the chemical and toxicological properties of

the two oxidation states appear to be quite different and the toxicicies of

che two states have not been shown to be additive, chromium(III) and

chromium(VI) will be treated as separate materials herein.

     Because of che variety of forms of chromium(lll) and chromium(VI) and

lack of definitive information about their relative toxicities, no available

analytical measurement is known to be ideal for expressing aquatic life

criteria for chromium.  Previous aquatic life criteria for chromium (U.S.

EPA, 1980) were expressed in terms of total recoverable chromium(III) and

total recoverable chromium(VI), but the individual oxidation states cannot be

distinguished by this method.  Acid-soluble chromium(III) (operationally

defined as the chromium(HI) that passes through a 0.45 ym membrane filcer

afcer the sample is acidified to pH " 1.5 to 2.0 with nicric acid) and

acid-soluble chromium(VI) are probably the best measurements at the present

for the following reasons:

1.  These measurements are compatible wich all available data concerning

    toxicity of chromium to, and bioaccumulation of chromium by, aquacic

    organisms.  No test results were rejected just because it was likely that
*An understanding of the "Guidelines for Deriving Numerical National Wacer
Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and Their Uses"
(Stephan, et al. 1985), hereafter referred co as the Guidelines, is necessary
in order to understand che following cexc, tables, and calculations.

-------
    they would have been substantially different if they had been reported in




    terms of acid-soluble chromium.   For example,  results reported in terras




    of dissolved chromium(III) would not have been used if the concentration




    of precipitated chromium was substantial.




2.  On samples of ambient water, measurement of acid-soluble chromium(III)




    and chroraium(VI) should measure  all forms of chromium that are toxic to




    aquatic life or can be readily converted to toxic forms under natural




    conditions.  In addition, these  measurements should not measure several




    forms, such as chromium that is  occluded in minerals, clays, and sand or




    is strongly sorbed to particulate matter, that are not toxic and are not




    likely to become toxic under natural conditions-.   Although this measure-




    ment (and many others) will measure soluble, complexed forms of chromium,




    such as the EDTA complex of chromium(III),  that probably have low




    toxicities to aquatic life, concentrations  of these forms probably are




    negligible in most ambient water.




3.  Although water quality criteria  apply to ambient  water, the measurements




    used to express criteria are likely to be used to measure chromium in




    aqueous effluents.  Measurements of acid-soluble  chromium(III) and




    chromium(VI) should be applicable to effluents because they will measure




    precipitates, such as carbonate  and hydroxide precipitates of




    chromium(III), that might exist  in an effluent and dissolve when the




    effluent is diluted with receiving water.  If desired, dilution of




    effluent with receiving water before measurement  of acid-soluble chromium




    might be used to determine whether the receiving  water can decrease the




    concentration of acid-soluble chromium because of sorption.  However, the




    relationship between what is in  an effluent and what will occur in the

-------
    receiving water should cake inco accounc che possibility of conversion of




    one oxidation state of chromium co che ocher.




4.  The acid-soluble measurement should be useful  for raosc raecals, chus




    minimizing che number of samples and procedures chac are necessary.




5.  The acid-soluble raeasuremenc does noc require  filtracion ac che cime of




    collection, as does che dissolved measurement.




6.  For che measurement of total acid-soluble chromium the only creacmenc




    required ac che time of collection is preservation by acidification co pH




    * 1.5 to 2.0, similar to that required for the measurement of total




    recoverable chromium.  Durations of 10 minutes to 24 hours between




    acidification and filtration probably will not affect the measurement of




    total acid-soluble chromium substantially.  However, acidification might




    not prevent conversion of chromium(III) to chromium(Vl) or vice versa.




    Therefore, measurement of acid-soluble chromium(IIl) or acid-soluble




    chroraiura(VI) or both will probably require separation or measurement at




    the time of collection of Che sample or special preservation to prevent




    conversion of one oxidation state of chromium  to the other.




7.  The carbonate system has a much higher buffer  capacity from pH = 1.5 to




    2.0 than it does from pH » 4 to 9 (Weber and Stumm, 1963).




8.  Differences in pH within the range of 1.5 to 2.0 probably will not affect




    the result substantially.




9.  The acid-soluble measurement does not require  a digestion step, as does




    the total recoverable measurement.




10. After acidification and filtracion of che sample to isolate the acid-




    soluble chromium, the analysis can be performed using either atomic




    absorption spectroscopy or ICP-eraission spectroscopy for total

-------
    acid-soluble chromium or a chelacion-extraccion or coprecipitacion




    procedure for chromium(VI) (U.S. EPA, 1983a).




11. Ic is noc possible to separately measure cocal recoverable chromium(III)




    and total recoverable chromium(VI).




Thus, expressing aquatic life criteria for chromium in terms of the acid-




soluble measurement has both toxicological and practical advantages.  On the




other hand, because no measurement is known to be ideal for expressing




aquatic life criteria for chromium or for measuring chromium in ambient water




or aqueous effluents, measurement of both cocal acid-soluble chromium and




total recoverable 'chromium in ambient water or effluent or both might be




useful.  For example, there might be cause for concern if total recoverable




chromium is much above an applicable limit, even though total acid-soluble




chromium is below the limit.




     Unless otherwise noted, all concentrations reported herein are expected




to be essentially equivalent to acid-soluble chromium.  All concentrations




are expressed as chromium, not as the chemical tested.  The criteria




presented herein supersede previous aquatic life water quality criteria for




chromium (U.S. EPA, 1976, 1980) because  these new criteria were derived using




improved procedures and additional information.  Whenever adequately




justified, a national criterion may be replaced by a site-specific criterion




(U.S. EPA, 1983b), which may include not only site-specific criterion




concentrations (U.S. EPA, 1983c), but also site-specific durations of




averaging periods and site-specific frequencies of allowed exceedences (U.S.




EPA, 1985).  The latest literature search for information for chis document




was conducted in May, 1984; some newer information was also used.

-------
Acute Toxicicy to Aquatic Animals




Chromium(VI)




     Muller (1980, 1982) studied che influence of hardness, alkalinicy, and




calcium-magnesium ratio on the 24-hr LCSOs for Daphnia magna, and found that




potassium dichromate was more toxic at lower hardness and alkalinity.  In




addition, dichromate was less toxic at a 4:1 calcium-magnesium ratio than




when the hardness was due only to calcium or magnesium.  Call, et al. (1981)




determined the acute toxicity of four chromium(VI) salts to Daphnia magna in




static tests (Tables 1 and 6).  They conducted toxicity tests on each salt in




hard (185 to 213 rag/L) water ar pH » 7.5 to 7.6 and at pH - 8.2 co 8.4, and




in Lake Superior water (hardness * 50 mg/L and pH * 7.5).  In these three




tests the animals were not fed and a 43-hr EC50 was determined.  In addition,




both 48-hr and 96-hr ECSOs were determined in Lake Superior water in tests in




which the animals were fed.  Concentrations of chromium were measured in all




tests and there were only minor differences in the toxicities of the four




salts.  Test concentrations of both the dichromates and chromates had but a




small influence on the pH of the test solutions.  In hard water all four




sales were less toxic at the higher pH.  All four were 5 to 9 times more




toxic in soft Lake Superior water than in che hard wacer at a pH of 7.5 to




7.6.  The presence of food had little effect on che results at 48 hours, and




in the tests with food, the 48- and 96-hr ECSOs were about the same.




Stephenson and Watts (1984) studied the effect of diet and temperature on che




toxicity of chromium(VI) to Daphnia magna.




     Wallen, et al. (1957) studied the toxicity of chromium(Vl) co tnosquico-




fish in turbid water using potassium and sodium salts of both dichromate and




chromate (Table 6) but the effect of turbidity on toxicity was not studied.

-------
The dichromate sales were slightly more coxic chan che chromace sales.  Trama




and Benoic (1960) compared che coxicicies of dichromace and chroraace to the




bluegill in soft water.  The 96-hr LCSOs were 110,000 Mg/L for dichromate and




170,000 yg/L for chromate.  They concluded that the acidic dichromate was




more toxic than the basic chromate because the greatest part of the




chromium(VI) was in the form of the hydrochromate ion at che lower pH of che




dichromate solutions, whereas at the higher pH of che chromate solutions most




of the chromiura(VI) was in the form of the chromate ion.




     The toxicity of chromium(VI) to the bluegill in soft and hard water was




determined at 18 C and 30 C (Academy of Natural Sciences, 1960).  At 18 C che




96-hr LCSOs were 113,000 [jg/L in soft water and 135,000 >Jg/L in hard water.




Similar results were obtained at 30 C with the 96-hr LCSOs being 113,000 yg/L




in soft water and 130,400 ug/k in hard water.  Pickering and Henderson (1966)




cesced che coxicicy of potassium dichromate to the Cathead minnow and




bluegill in soft and hard water.  The 96-hr LCSOs for the fathead minnow in




soft and hard water were 17,600 and 27,300 ug/L, respectively.  The




corresponding values for the bluegill were 118,000 pjg/L and 133,000 yg/L.




     Hogendoorn-Roozemond, et al. (1978) reported on the acute toxicity of




sodium chromace co che rainbow trout at cwo pH levels.  Mechods for che scudy




were not given so che values are not listed in Table 1 or Table 6.  They




reported that young rainbow trout were much more sensitive to sodium chromate




at pH • 6.9 than at pH « 7.9 and concluded that chromic acid was the most




probable chromium compound or ion responsible for chromium(Vl) toxicity.  van




der Putce, et al. (1982) found that chroraium(VI) is more toxic at pH * 6.5




than at pH » 7.8 (Table 6).




     Adelman and Smith (1976) found chat che chreshold lethal concentration




for chromium(VI) does not occur wichrn 96 hours (Tables 1 and 6).  For 16



                                      6

-------
casts the average ratio of 11-day to 96-hr LC50s was 0.37 for the fathead




minnow and 0.27 for the goldfish.  White (Manuscript) conducted static tests




with measured concentrations to determine the 96-hr LCSOs for eleven fish




species and three invertebrate species (Table 1).  These acute values ranged




from 36,300 yg/L for the yellow perch to 1,870,000 ^g/L for a stonefly.  This




value for the stonefly is the highest acute value for any aquatic animal.




     The toxicity of chromium(VI) apparently increases as pH is lowered or as




hardness is lowered or both.  Although there are exceptions, softer surface




waters usually have a lower pH than harder surface waters.  However, the




available data are insufficient to develop criteria on the basis of water




quality characteristics.  The Species Mean Acute Values of the five most




sensitive animals were determined in soft water.




     Genus Mean Acute Values were calculated (Table 3) as the geometric means




of the available Species Mean Acute Values (Table 1).  Of the 27 genera for




which data are available, the most sensitive, Daphnia, is 64,600 times more




sensitive than the most resistant, Neophasganophora.  Acute values are




available for more than one species in each of five genera, and the range of




Species Mean Acute Values within each genus is less than a factor of 2.  Both




the eight most sensitive and the three most resistant genera are




invertebrates.  A freshwater Final Acute Value of 31.49 ,jg/L was calculated




from the Genus Mean Acute Values using the procedure described in the




Guidelines; this value is slightly above that for the genus Daphnia.




     Dorfman (1977), Fales (1978), Frank and Robertson (1979), and Olson and




Harrell (1973) reported that the toxicity of chromiura(Vl) to a fish, shrimp,




crab, and clam increased as salinity decreased (Tables Land 6).  The change




was usually less than a factor of two, except when salinity was about 1 g/kg.

-------
Daca from casts ac such very low salinities are in Table 6 and were not used




in deriving criteria.  Fales (1978) also found that toxicity was greater at




25 C than at 10 C.




     Of the 21 saltwater genera for which acute values are available, the




most sensitive, Nereis, is about 52 times more sensitive than the most




resistant, Nassarius (Table 3).  This range is surprisingly small compared to




the very large range of sensitivities of freshwater animals to chromium(VI).




Both the twelve most sensitive and two most resistant genera are inverte-




brates.  Acute values are available for two species in each of two genera,




and the range of Species Mean Acute Values within each genus is less than a




factor of 2.2.  The saltwater Final Acute Value of 2,158 Mg/L for




chromium(V.I) was calculated from the Genus Mean Acute Values in Table 3.








Chroraium(HI)




     Chapman, et al. (Manuscript) measured the acute toxicity of




chromium(III) to Daphnia magna at three hardnesses and the 48-hr acute values




ranged from 16,800 ^ig/L in soft water to 58,700 ug/L in hard water.




Pickering and Henderson (1966) obtained 96-hr LCSOs of 5,070 and 67,400 Mg/L




with the fathead minnow in soft and hard water, respectively.  The




corresponding values for the bluegill were 7,460 and 71,900 jJg/L.




     Different species exhibit different sensitivities to chromium(III), and




many other factors might affect the results of tests of the toxicity of




chromium(lll) to aquatic organisms.  Criteria can quantitatively take into




account such a factor, however, only if enough data are available to show that




the factor similarly affects the results of tests wich a variety of. species.




Hardness is often thought of as having a major effect on the toxicity of

-------
chromium(III), although the observed effect  is probably due  to one or more of




a number of usually interrelated ions, such  as hydroxide, carbonate, calcium,




and magnesium.  Hardness is used here as a surrogate  for  the ions which




affect the results of toxicity tests on chromium(III).  An analysis of




covariance (Dixon and Brown, 1979; Neter and Wasserman, 1974) was performed




using the natural logarithm of the acute value as the dependent variable,




species as the treatment or grouping variable, and the natural logarithm of




hardness as the covariate or independent variable.  This  analysis of




covariance model was fit to the data in Table 1 for the three species for




which acute values" are  available over a range of hardness such that the




highest hardness is at least three times the lowest and the  highest is at




least 100 mg/L higher than the lowest.  The slopes for all three species are




between 0.73 and 0.89 (see end of Table 1) and are close  to  the slope of




0.667 which is expected on the basis that calcium, magnesium, and carbonate




have a charge of two, whereas chroraium(III) has a charge  of  three.  An F-test




showed that, under the assumption of equality of slopes,  the probability of




obtaining three slopes as dissimilar as these is P30.82.  This was




interpreted as indicating that it is reasonable to assume that the slopes for




these three species are the same.




     The pooled slope of 0.8190 was then used with the data  in Table 1 to




calculate Species Mean Acute Values at a hardness of 50 mg/L.  Genus Mean




Acute Values (Table 3) were then calculated as geometric means of the




available Species Mean Acute Values.  Acute values are available for more




than one species in each of two genera and the range of Species Mean Acute




Values within each genus is less than a factor of 1.3.  The  most sensitive




genus, Ephemerella,  is about 32 times more sensitive than the most resistant

-------
genus, Hydropsyche; incerescingly, both of chese are inseccs.  The freshwacer
Final Acute Value of 1,968 ug/L was calculated at a hardness of 50 mg/L from
the Genus Mean Acute Values in Table 3 using the procedure described in the
Guidelines.  Thus, the freshwater Criterion Maximum Concentration (in Jg/L) *
e(0.8190[ln(hardness)]+3.688)>

     The acute toxicity of chromium(III) in salt water has been determined
with only two species (Table 1).  The acute value for the eastern oyster is
10,300 yg/L, whereas that for the mummichog is 31,500 pg/L.


Chronic Toxicity to Aquatic Animals
Chromium(VI)
     Benoit (1976) studied the chronic effects of chromium(VI) on brook trout
and rainbow trout.  For both species che most sensitive effect was mortality,
the chronic limits were 200 and 350 Mg/L, and the resulting chronic value was
264.6 jJg/L.  Although growth during the first eight months was retarded at
all test concentrations, this effect was temporary and was not used to
establish the chronic limits.  In an early life-stage test with rainbow
trout, Sauter, et al. (1976) found chronic limits of 51 and 105 ug/L,
resulting in a chronic value of 73.18 |Jg/L.  These limits were based on a
reduction in growth 60 days after hatch and this chronic value was about
one-fourth the chronic value of 264.6 Mg/L from the chronic test reported by
Benoit (1976).  The species mean acute-chronic ratios for brook trout and
rainbow trout, calculated from the data of Benoit (1976) are 223.0 and 260.8,
respectively (Table 3).  Sauter, et al. (1976) provided no acute data in
their study with which to calculate an acute-chronic ratio.
     The limits of 1,000 and 3,950 ug/L in a life-cycle test with the fathead
minnow (Pickering, 1980) were based on survival.  As with the trout, an early
                                     10

-------
recardacion of growth was only temporary.  The chronic value of  1,987 ^g/L is




much higher than that for the trout but the acute-chronic ratio  of 18.55 is




much lower.




     Six chronic values are available for five species of daphnids and they




range from less than 2.5 to 40 Mg/L (Table 2).  The results of Trabalka and




Gehrs (1977) support those of Mount (1982).  The  five species mean acute-




chronic ratios range from 1.13 to >6.957 (Table 3).  The species mean




acute-chronic ratio for chromium(VI) seems to be  lower for sensitive species




so the four known acute-chronic ratios for daphnids were used to calculate




the freshwater Final Acute-Chronic Ratio of 2.917  (Table 3).  Division of the




Final Acute Value by the Final Acute-Chronic Ratio results in a  freshwater




Final Chronic Value of 10.80 ug/L, which is in the range of the  chronic




values for the cladocerans.




     Results of life-cycle tests with the saltwater polychaece,  Neanthes




arenaceodentata, and the mysid, Mysidopsis bahia,  are reported in Table 2.




Other life-cycle data on the polychaetes, Capitella capitata and Ophryotrocha




diadema, were placed in Table 6 because exposure concentrations  were not




adequately measured.  Chronic values for If. arenaceodentata ranged from less




than 13 to 36.74 jjg/L depending upon che generation cesced, whereas chat for




the mysid was 132 ug/L.  Reduction in the number of young per brood was the




most sensitive effect for both species (Table 3).  The acute-chronic ratios




were 121.8 for the polychaete and 15.38 for the mysid, and these two species




were among the most acutely sensitive to chromium(VI).  If the geometric mean




of these two ratios is used as the saltwater Final Acute-Chronic Ratio,




division of the saltwater Final Acute Value for chromiura(VI) by  the Final




Acute-Chronic Ratio results in a saltwater Final Chronic Value of 49.86
                                     11

-------
However, reproduction of Neanthes arenaceodentaca was affecced at

concentrations ranging from <13 co 54 yg/L.


                           j
Chromium(lII)

     Chapman, ec al. (Manuscript) studied the chronic toxicity of

chromiumdll) to Daphnia magna at three hardnesses (Table 2).  The daphnids

were about three times as sensitive at a hardness of 52 mg/L as at a hardness

of 100 mg/L.  At a hardness of 200 mg/L, however, chromium(III) was more

toxic than at 52 mg/L.  They speculated that ingested precipitated chromium

contributed to toxicity in the hard water exposure.  The chronic values of

Chapman, et al. (Manuscript) were regressed against hardness but the slope

was not significant.  Biesinger and Christensen (1972) studied the chronic

toxicity of chroraium(III) to Daphnia magna in soft water but did not measure

the chromium concentrations (Table 6).  Their chronic value of 330 Mg/L was

about five times greater than the value obtained by Chapman, et al.

(Manuscript) in soft water.

     The chronic toxicity of chromium(lll) to fish has been studied in a

life-cycle test with the fathead minnow in hard water and in an early

life-stage test with rainbow trout in soft water.  Pickering (Manuscript)

found that the upper chronic limit for the fathead minnow was based on

survival of both first and second generation fish.  Stevens and Chapman

(1984) found that this limit for trout was based on survival.  Trout in soft

water were much more sensitive chronically than the fathead minnow in hard

water, and the acute-chronic ratio for trout was about two times greater than

that for the minnow.

     Both the freshwater chronic values and acute-chronic ratios for

chromiumdll) range from about 27 to about 1,300.  A chronic value of 68.63

                                     12

-------
pg/L is available for Che rainbow crouc.  Because chis  is an  important and




relatively sensitive species, it seems reasonable to base the Final Chronic




Value on this datum.  Although hardness did not have a  consistent relation-




ship to the chronic toxicity of chromium(HI) to Daphnia magna, a filter




feeder, it does not seem unreasonable to assume that hardness relates to




chronic toxicity to rainbow trout about the same way it related, on the




average, to acute toxicity to Daphnia magna, the fathead minnow, and the




bluegill.  Thus, 0.8190 is used as the chronic slope (Table 3) and the



freshwater Final Chronic Value (in ug/L) - e(0.8190[ln(hardness) M.561) ^




     A life-cycle test has been conducted on chromium(HI) with the saltwater




polychaete worm, Neanthes arenaceodentata.  A concentration of 50,400 yg/L,




which is above the acute values obtained with the eastern oyster and the




munnnichog, did not substantially affect the test species.








Toxicity to Aquatic Plants




Chromium(Vl)




     Tests have been conducted with a wide variety of freshwater plants




(Table 4) and the effect concentrations of chromium(VI) range from 2 Mg/L for




the blue alga, Microcyscis aeruginosa, co 7,800 |jg/L for che diacom,




Nitzschia linearis.  Toxicity of chrotniura(VI) to the diatom, Navicula




seminulum, was tested at three temperatures and two hardnesses (Academy of




Natural Sciences, 1960).  The geometric mean of the concentrations causing a




50 percent reduction in growth was 245 ^g/L at the lower water hardness and




335 Mg/L at the higher hardness.   The diatom was more sensitive to




chroraium(Vl) at 22 C than at 30 C.




     Toxicity studies were performed with the saltwater macroalga, Macro-




cystis pyrifera. to investigate the effect of chromium(VI) on photosynthesis




                                   ,  13

-------
(Table 4).  The 96-hr EC50 reported by Clendenning and North (1959) was 5,000




Hg/L, whereas 20 percent inhibition was noted after five days at 1,000 ,Jg/L




by Bernhard and Zattera (1975).  These plants are almost as sensitive to




chroraiutn(VI) as the most sensitive animal species.









Chromium(III)




     Toxicity tests on chromium(III) have only been conducted wich two




freshwater plant species (Table 4).  Richter (1982) studied the toxicity of




chroraium(III) to Selenastrum capricornutum and calculated the results from




initial measured concentrations.  Chromium(lll) was less toxic than




chromium(VI) co this green alga.  The algistatic concentration was >1000




;jg/L, and the concentration that caused a 50% reduction in growth was 397




|jg/L.  No toxicity tests have been conducted on chromium(III) wich a salt-




water plant.








Bioaccumulation




Chroraiutn(VI)




     The three bioconcentration factors (BCFs) determined with che rainbow




trout are less than three (Table 5).  Apparently, algae accumulate chromium




to a much greater extent, because Patrick, et al. (1975) found a BCF of 8,500




for an algal community (Table 6).  The BCFs determined with a saltwater




polychaete, mussel, and oyster range from 125 to 200 (Table 5).









Chromiura(lII)




     No data are available concerning the bioaccumulation of chroraium(III) by




freshwater organisms.  Bioconcentration tests on chromium(lll) in salt water
                                     14

-------
wich the blue mussel, soft-shell clam, and oyster resulted in BCFs from 86 to




153 (Table 5).  These BCFs are similar to those for chromium(VI).









Other Data




Chroraiura(VI)




     Zarafonecis and Hampton (1974) reported inhibition of photosynthesis of




a natural population of river algae exposed to 20 jJg/L (Table 6).  Olson and




Foster (1956) reported a ten percent reduction in growth of chinook salmon




and rainbow trout at 16 and 21 ug/L, respectively.  As noted earlier, Benoit




(1976) and Pickering (1980) also reported effects on growth of  fishes exposed




to low concentrations, but in these life-cycle tests the effect was temporary




and was not used to establish chronic limits.  A 7-day EC50 of  30 Mg/L was




reported for the narrow-mouthed toad (Birge, 1978).




     Exposures of the saltwater polychaete, Neanthes arenaceodentata, to




chroraium(VI) for 56 and 59 days resulted in LCSOs of 200 ^g/L (Table 6)




compared to the 96-hr LC50 of 3,100 ;jg/L (Table 1).  Sublethal  effects




reported for this species show inhibition of tube building at 79 [Jg/L.




Hol.land, et al. (1960) reported toxicity to salmon at a concentration of




31,800 |Jg/L, which is similar to the Species Mean Acute Value for che




speckled sanddab but twice as high as that reported for che Atlantic




silverside (Table 1).








Chroraium(III)




     Embryos of a freshwater snail are rather insensitive co chromium(III)




(Table 6).  Oshida, ec al. (1976, 1981) were able co kill a salcwacer




polychaete worm with chromium(HI) by adding 50,400 Mg/^i probably because
                                     15

-------
che pH dropped co 4.5.  When the pH was raised co about 7.9 by adding sodium




hydroxide, Che worms noc only survived for at lease 160 days, buc also




reproduced (Table 6).









Unused Daea




     Some daca on che effects of chromium on aquatic organisms were noc used




because che studies were conducced with species chac are noc residenc in




Norch America (e.g., Ahsanullah, 1982; Baudouin and Scoppa, 1974; Cairns and




Loos, 1967; Lee and Xu, 1984; Mbshe, ec al. 1972; Okubo and Okubu, 1962;




Pagano, ec al. 1983; Ramusino, ec al. 1981; Ravera, 1977; Srivascava, ec al.




1979) or because che cesc species was noc obtained in Norch America and was




noc identified well enough to determine if it is resident in North America




(e.g., van Weeretc, et al. 1984).  Data were noc used if chromium was a




component of an effluent (Klassen, et al. 1949), drilling mud (Bookhout, ec




al. 1982; Carr, et al. 1982; Conklin, ec al. 1983), or a mixture (Wong, ec




al. 1982b).  Reviews by Chapman, et al. (1968), Eisler (1981), Eisler, et al.




(1979), European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission (1983), National




Research Council of Canada (1976), Phillips and Russo (1978), and Thompson,




et al. (1972) only contain data that have been published elsewhere.




     Some data, such as those in Babich, et al. (1982), Bovee (1976),




Brkovic-Popovic and Popovic (1977a,b), Draggan (1977), Grande and Andersen




(1983), Schaefer and Pipes (1973), and Sudo and Aiba (1973), were noc used




because the tests were conducted in distilled, deionized, chlorinated, or




"cap" wacer.  Algal cescs were noc used if chey were noc conducced in an




appropriace medium (Scary and Kraczer, 1982).  Smitlv and Reach (1979) only




presenced resulcs graphically.  Daca reported by Frey, ec al. (1983),




Gencile, ec al. (1982), Ten Holder, ec al. (1978), and Verriopoulos (1980)



                                     16

-------
were noc used because either che mechods or results were not adequately




presented.  Bringmann and Kuhn (1982) cultured Daphnia magna in one water and




conducted tests in another.  High control mortalities occurred in all except




two tests reported by Sauter, et al. (1976).  The 96-hr values reported by




Buikeraa, et al. (1974a,b) were subject to error because of possible




reproductive interactions (Buikema, et al. 1977).  Berglind and Dave (1984)




cultured and tested their organisms in different waters.  Dowden and Bennett




(1965), Freeman and Fowler (1953), and Wong, et al. (1982a) did not report




the hydration of the chemical used.




     Elwood, et al. (1980), Giesy and Wiener (1977), Gordon (1980), Lucus and




Edgington (1970), Martin (1984), Mathis and Cummings (1973), Pearce, et al.




(1971), and long, et al. (1974) did not report sufficient measurements of




chromium concentrations in water to allow use of results of their field




studies.  The significance of physiological effects due to in vitro exposures




could not be determined to allow use of studies by Christensen and Tucker




(1976), Hoffert and Fromm (1964), and van der Putte and Part (1982).




     Results of bioconcentration tests were not used if the tests were




conducted in distilled water, were not long enough, or were not flow-through,




or if the concentration of chromium in the test solution was not adequately




measured (e.g., Flos, et al. 1983; Freeman, 1978, 1980; Smock, 1983; Stary,




et al. 1982; Waiting, 1981b).  Shuster and Pringle (1969) and Sklar (1980)




did not report whether their bioconcentration tests were conducted on




chromium(HI)  or chromium(VI).
                                     17

-------
Summary




Chromium(VI)




     Acute toxicity values for chromium(VI) are available  for  freshwater




animal species in 27 genera and range from 23.07 ;Jg/L for  a cladoceran  co




1,870,000 ug/L for a sconefly.  These species include a wide variety of




animals chac perform a wide spectrum of ecological functions.  All five




tested species of daphnids are especially sensitive.  The  few  data that are




available indicate that the acute toxicity of chromium(VI) decreases as




hardness and pH increase.




     The chronic value for both rainbow trout and brook trout  is 264.6  Mg/L»




which is much lower than the chronic value of 1,987 Mg/L for the fathead




minnow.  The acute-chronic ratios for these three fishes range from 18.55 to




260.8.  In all three chronic tests a temporary reduction in growth occurred




at low concentrations.  Six chronic tests with five species of daphnids gave




chronic values that range from <2.5 to 40 ;Jg/L and the acute-chronic ratios




range from 1.130 to >9.680.  Except for the fathead minnow, all the chronic




tests were conducted in soft water.  Green algae are quite sensitive to




chromium(VI).  The bioconcentration factor obtained with rainbow trout  is




less than three.  Growth of Chinook salmon was reduced at  a measured




concentration of 16 ug/L.




     The acute toxicity of chroraium(VI) to 23 saltwater vertebrate and




invertebrate species ranged from 2,000 ^ig/L for a polychaete worm and a mysid




to 105,000 (Jg/L for the mud snail.  The chronic values for a polychaete




ranged from <13 to 36.74 pg/L, whereas that for a mysid was 132 iag/L.   The




acute-chronic ratios ranged from 15.38 to >238.5.  Toxicity to raacroalgae was




reported at 1,000 and 5,000 ug/L.  Bioconcentration factors for chromium(VI)




range from 125 to 236 for bivalve molluscs «nd polychaetes.



                                     18

-------
Chromium(III)



     Acute values for chromiura(III) are available  for 20 freshwater animal




species in 18 genera ranging from 2,221 pg/L for a mayfly  to  71,060 ,jg/L  for




a caddisfly.  Hardness has a significant influence on toxicity, wich




chroraium(III) being more toxic in soft water.




     A life-cycle test with Daphnia magna in soft water gave  a chronic value




of 66 Mg/I"  In a comparable test in hard water the lowest test concentration




of 44 Mg/L inhibited reproduction of Daphnia magna, but this  effect may have




been due to  ingested precipitated chromium.  In a  life-cycle  test wich the




fathead minnow in hard water the chronic value was 1,025 ag/L.  Toxicity  data




are available for only two freshwater plant species.  A. concentration of




9,900 ;jg/L inhibited growth of roots of Eurasian watermilfoil.  A freshwater




green alga was affected by a concentration of 397 ^g/L in  soft water.  No




bioconcentration factor has been measured for chromiura(HI) with freshwater




organisms.     (




     Only two acute values are available for chromium(III) 'in salt water  -




10,300 ug/L  for the eastern oyster and 31,500 ^Jg/L for the mummichog.  In a




chronic test effects were not observed on a polychaete worm at 50,400 ^Jg/L ac




pH = 7.9, but acute lethality occurred when pH = 4.5.  Bioconcentration




factors for  saltwater organisms and chromium(III) range from  86 co 153, which




are similar  to the bioconcentration factors for chromium(VI)  and saltwater




species.








National Criteria




Chromium(VI)




     The procedures described in the "Guidelines for Deriving Numerical




National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and




                                     19

-------
Their Uses" indicate chat, except possibly where a locally important species




is very sensitive, freshwater aquatic organisms and their uses should not be




affected unacceptably if the four-day average concentration of chromium(VI)




does not exceed 11 Mg/t- more than once every three years on the average and




if the one-hour average concentration does not exceed 16 (Jg/L more than once




every three years on the average.




     The procedures described in the "Guidelines for Deriving Numerical




National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and




Their Uses" indicate that, except possibly where a locally important species




is very sensitive, saltwater aquatic organisms and their uses should not be




affected unacceptabiy if the four-day average concentration of chrotniura(VT)




does not exceed 50 [Jg/L more than once every three years on the average and




if the one-hour average concentration does not exceed 1,100 ug/L more than




once every three years on the average.  Data suggest that the acute coxicity




of chromium(VI) is salinity-dependent; therefore the one-hour average concen-




tration might be underprotective at low salinities.








Chromium(III)




     The procedures described in the "Guidelines for Deriving Numerical




National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and




Their Uses" indicate that, except possibly where a locally important species




is very sensitive, freshwater aquatic organisms and their uses should not be




affected unacceptably if the four-day average concentration (in |Jg/L) of




chroraium(HI) does not exceed the numerical value given by



e(0.8190[ln(hardness)1+1.561) more chan once every chree years on the




average and if the one-hour average concentration (in ;Jg/L) does not exceed



the numerical value given by e(0.8190[ln(hardness)1+3.688) more chan




                                     20

-------
once every chree years on the average.  For example, at hardnesses of 50,




100, and 200 mg/L as CaC03 che four-day average concentrations of




chromium(III) are 120, 210, and 370 ug/L, respectively, and che one-hour




average concentrations are 980, 1,700, and 3,100 ;jg/L.




     No saltwater criterion can be derived for chromium(III), buc 10,300




is the EC50 for eastern oyster embryos, whereas 50,400 ug/L did not affect a




polychaete worm in a life-cycle test.




     EPA believes that a measurement such as "acid-soluble" would provide a




more scientifically correct basis upon which co establish criteria for




metals.  The criteria were developed on this basis.  However, at this time,




no EPA approved methods for such a measurement are available to implement the




criteria through the regulatory programs of the Agency and the States.  The




Agency is considering development and approval of methods for a measurement




such as "acid-soluble".  Until available, however, EPA recommends applying




the criteria using the total recoverable method.  This has two impacts: (1)




certain species of some metals cannot be analyzed directly because the total




recoverable method does not distinguish between individual oxidation states,




and (2) these criteria may be overly protective when based on the total




recoverable method.




     The recommended exceedence frequency of three years is the Agency's best




scientific judgment of the average amount of time it will take an unstressed




system to recover from a pollution event in which exposure to chromium




exceeds the criterion.  Stressed systems, for example, one in which several




outfalls occur in a limited area, would be expected to require more time for




recovery.  The resilience of ecosystems and their ability to recover differ




greatly, however,  and site-specific criteria may be established if adequate




justification is provided.




                                     21

-------
     The use of criteria in designing wasce treatment facilities requires the




selection of an appropriate wasteload allocation model.   Dynamic models are




preferred for the application of these criteria.  Limited data or other




factors may make their use impractical,  in which case one should rely on a




steady-state model.   The Agency recommends the interim use of 1Q5 or 1Q10 for




Criterion Maximum Concentration (CMC) design flow and 7Q5 or 7Q10 for the




Criterion Continuous Concentration (CCC)  design flow in steady-state models




for unstressed and stressed systems respectively.  These matters are




discussed in more detail in the Technical Support Document for Water




Quality-Based Toxics Control (U.S. EPA,  1985).
                                     22

-------
Table I.  Acute Toxic Ity of Chromium to Aquatic Anlnels
Species
Method*
Chemical
Hardness LC50 Species Mean
(mg/L as or EC50 Acute Value
CaCO,) ((ig/L)»« (iig/L)"«
FRESHWATER SPECIES
Chromlum(VI)
Sna 1 1 ,
Physa heterostropha
Snail,
Physa heterostropha
Snail,
Physa heterostropha
Snal 1,
Physa heterostropha
Snail,
Physa heterostropha
to Cladoceran,
Cerlodaphnla retlculata
Cladoceran,
Cerlodaphnla retlculata
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
s,
s.
s.
s.
s,
FT,
FT,
s.
s.
s.
s,
s.
s,
u
u
u
u
u
M
M
U
U
U
U
M
M
Potassium
dl chroma te
Potassium
chroma te
Potassium
chroma te
Potassium
chromate
Potassium
chr ornate
Sodium
dichr ornate
Sod 1 urn
chromate
Sodium
dl chromate
Potassium
dl chromate
Sod 1 urn
dl chromate
Potassium
d| chromate
Potassium
dl chromate
43 16,800
45 17,300
45 17,300
171 40,600
171 31,600 23,010
45 45.2
45 45 45.10
<103
<123
141
3,490
213 212f
196 85.7tf
                                                                      Reference
                                                                       Patrick,  et  al.  1968
                                                                       Academy  of  Natural
                                                                       Sciences,  1960;
                                                                       Patrick, et al.  1968

                                                                       Academy  of  Natural
                                                                       Sciences,  I960

                                                                       Academy  of  Natural
                                                                       Sciences,  I960

                                                                       Academy  of  Natural
                                                                       Sciences,  I960

                                                                       Mount, 1982
                                                                       Mount 4 Norberg,  1984
                                                                       Anderson, 1946
                                                                       Anderson, 1946
                                                                       Oowden & Bennett,
                                                                       1965

                                                                       Dowden & Bennett,
                                                                       1965

                                                                       Cat I, et al. 1981
                                                                       Cal I,  et al. 1981

-------
Table I.  (Continued)
Species
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla maqna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Method"
S, M
s.
s.
s,
S,
s,
s.
s.
s,
s.
s.
s,
s.
s.
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
Chen leal
Potassium
dichromate
Potassium
dichromate
Sodium
chromate
Potassium
dichromate
Potassium
dichromate
Sodium
dichromate
Sodium
dichromate
Sod 1 urn
dichromate
Potassium
chromate
Potassium
chromate
Potassium
chromate
Sodium
chromate
Sodium
chromate
Sodium
chromate
Hardness
(mg/L as
CaC03)
50
45
-
100
92
185
196
50
212
188
50
185
213
50
LC50 Species Mean
or EC50 Acute Value
(gg/L)" (|ig/L)»"» Reference
19.9*"
900
50
175
157
I3|t
73.6"
21.3*"
137*
66.7"
15.3"*
164*
75.8**
20.6***
Cal 1,
et
al.
Cairns, et al
Trabalka
1977
White
White
Cal 1.
Call,
Cal 1,
Cal 1,
Call,
Cal 1,
Cal 1,
Call.
Call,
1981
. 1978
& Gohrs,
, 1979
, 1979
et
et
et
et
et
et
et
et
et
al.
al.
al.
al.
al.
at.
al.
al.
al.
1981
1981
1981
1981
1981
1981
1981
1981
1981

-------
Table 1.  (Continued)
Species
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla maqna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla maqna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla pulex
Cladoceran,
Daphnla pulex
to
In Cladoceran,
Daphnla pulex
Cladoceran,
S 1 mocepha 1 us serrulatus
Cladoceran,
SI mocepha (us vetulus
Cladoceran,
Slmocephalus vetulus
Amph 1 pod ,
Gammarus pseudol Imnaeus
Amph 1 pod ,
Gammarus pseudol Imnaeus
Amph 1 pod ,
Gammarus pseudol Imnaeus
Method*
s.
s.
s.
FT,
FT,
s.
s.
FT,
FT.
s.
FT,
s.
s.
FT,
U
U
U
M
M
M
U
M
M
U
M
M
U
M
Chemical
Potassium
dl chroma te
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Sodium
dlchromate
-
Potassium
dlchromate
-
Sodium
dlchromate
Sodium
dlchromate
Sodium
dlchromate
Potassium
chromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Hardness
(ng/L as
CaCOj)
240
240
240
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
50
48
48
LC50 Species Mean
or EC50 Acute Value

-------
Table  1.   (Continued)
Species

Amphlpod,
Hyalella azteca

Crayfish,
Orconectes rtistlcus

Damsel fly,
EnaMagma aspersum

Stonefly,
Neophasganophora capltata

Mldqe,
Chlronomus tentans

Mldqe,
Tanytarsus dlsslmllls

Bryozoan,
Pectinate Ha magnified

Bryozoan,
Lophopodella carter!

Bryozoan,
Plumatella emarqlnata

Rainbow trout,
Sal mo qalrdnerI
Brook trout,
Salvellnus fontlnalls

Central stoneroller,
Campostoma anomalum

Goldfish,
Carasslus auratus
Method*

 S, M


 S, M


 S, M


 S, M


 S, M


FT, M


 S, U


 S. U


 S, U


FT, M


FT, M


 S, M


 S, U
 ChenleaI

 Potassium
 chrornate

 Potassium
d I chrornate

 Potassium
dlchromate

 Potassium
dlchromate

 Potassium
dlchromate

 Potassium
dlchromate

 Potassium
 chromate

 Potassium
 chromate

 Potassium
 chromate

  Sodium
dlchromate

  Sodium
dlchromate

 Potassium
dlchromate

 Potassium
dlchromate
                                                             Hardness
                                                             (mg/L as
                                                              CnCOjl

                                                                50
                                                             120-160
                                                             120-160
  101


   47


  205


  205


  205


   45


   45


120-160


   20
               LC50
              or EC50
              d.g/L)««

                  630
              176,000
              140,000
                                                           Species Mean
                                                           Acute Value
                                                             120-160     1,870,000
61,000


57,300


  1,440


  1,560


   650


69,000


59,000


51,250


37,500
      630


  176,000


  140,000


1,870,000


   61,000


   57,300


    1,440


    1,560


      650


   69,000


   59,000


   51,250
                            Reference

                            Call, et al. 1981
                                                                                                        White, Manuscript
                                                                                                        White, Manuscript
                                           White, Manuscript
                                                                                                        Batac-Catalan & White,
                                                                                                        1983

                                                                                                        Call, et al. 1983
                                                                                                        Pardue & Wood, 1980
                                                                                                        Pardue & Wood, 1980
                                                                                                        Pardue & Wood, 1980
                                                                                                        Benolt, 1976
                                                                                                        Benolt, 1976
                                                                                                        White,  Manuscript
                                                                                                        Pickering 4
                                                                                                        Henderson, 1966

-------
Table I.  (Continued)
Species

Goldfish,
CarassIus
auratus
Goldfish,
Carasslus
auratus
Goldfish,
Carasslus
auratus
Goldfish,
Carasslus
auratus
Goldfish,
Carasslus
auratus
Goldfish,
Carasslus
auratus
Goldfish,
Carasslus
auratus
Goldfish,
Carasslus
auratus
Goldfish.
Carasslus
auratus
Goldfish,
Carasslus
auratus
Goldfish,
Carasslus
auratus
Goldfish,
Carasslus
auratus
Goldfish,
Carasslus
auratus
Goldfish,
Carasslus
auratus
Method*

 S, U


FT, M


FT, M


FT, M


FT, M


FT, H


FT, M


FT, M


FT, M


FT, M


FT, M


FT, M


FT, M


FT, M
 Chemical

 Potassium
dlchromata

 Potassium
dlchromata

 Potass I urn
dlchromata

 Potassium
dlchromata

 Potassium
dlchromata

 Potassium
dlchromata

 Potassium
dlchromata

 Potassium
dlchromata

 Potassium
dlchromata

 Potassium
dlchromata

 Potassium
dlchromata

 Potassium
dI chromate

 Potassium
dlchromata

 Potassium
d I chromate
                                                            Hardness
                                                            (mg/L as
                                                                 LC50
                                                                or EC50
                                                          Species Mean
                                                          Acute Value
220


220


220


220


220


220


220


220


220


220


220


220


220
110,000


123,000


123,000


 90,000


125,000


109,000


135,000


110,000


129,000


 98,000


133,000


102,000


133,000


126,000
                                                                                             Reference

                                                                                             Rlva, at al. 1981
Adelman & Smith,
1976

Adelman & Smith,
1976

Adelman & Smith,
1976

Adelman & Smith,
1976

Adalman & Smith,
1976

Adalman & Smith,
1976

Adalman & Smith,
1976

Adalman & Smith,
1976

Adelman & Smith,
1976

Adalman & Smith,
1976

Adalman & Smith,
1976

Adelman & Smith,
1976

Adalman & Smith,
1976

-------
       Table 1.   (Continued)
00
                                                             Hardness       LC50
                                                             (mg/L as      or EC50
Species                       Method*        Chemical          CaCOj)       (|ig/L)««

Goldfish,                     FT, M          Potassium          220         126,000
Carasslus  auratus                          .dlchromate

Goldfish,                     FT, M          Potassium          220         133,000
Carasslus  auratus                           dlchromate

Goldfish,                     FT, M          Potassium          220         126,000
Carasslus  auratus                           dlchromate

Goldfish,                     FT, M          Potassium          220         124,000
Carasslus  auratus                           dlchromate

SIIverjaw  minnow,              S, M          Potassium        120-160        49,600
Erlcymba buccata                            dlchromate

Emerald  shiner,                S, M          Potassium        120-160        48,400
Notropls atherlnoldes                       dlchromate

Striped  shiner,                S, M          Potassium        120-160        85,600
Notropls chrysocephalus                     dlchromate

Sand  shiner,                   S, M          Potassium        120-160        74,600
Notropls stramlneus                         dlchromate

Bluntnose  minnow,              S, M          Potassium         I20"-I60       54,225
Plmephales notatus                          dichromate

Fathead minnow,                S, M          Potassium         120-160       58,000
Plmephales promelas                         dlchromate

Fathead minnow,                S, U          Potassium          209          39,700
Plmephales promelas                         dlchromate

Fathead minnow,                S, U          Potassium          209          32,700
Plmephales promelas                        dlchromate

Fathead minnow,                S, U          Potassium           20          17,600
Plmephales promelas                        dlchromate

Fathead minnow,                S, U          Potassium          360          27,300
Plmephales promelas                        dlchromate
                                                                                               Species Mean
                                                                                               Acute Value
                                                                                                 (iig/L)*«*
119,500


 49,600


 48,400


 85,600


 74,600


 54,225
Reference

Adelman & Smith,
1976

Adelman & Smith,
1976

Adelman & Smith,
1976

Adelman & Smith,
1976

White, Manuscript
                                                                                                               White,  Manuscript
                                                                                                               White,  Manuscript
                                                                                                               White,  Manuscript
                                                                                                               White, Manuscript
                                                                                                               White, Manuscript
                                                                                                              Pickering,  1980
                                                                                                              Pickering,  1980
                                                                                                              Pickering &
                                                                                                              Henderson, 1966

                                                                                                              Pickering &
                                                                                                              Henderson, 1966

-------
       Table 1.  (Continued)
ro
Species
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales prome 1 as
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plroephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmaphales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Method*
«MmM»4MMHI»
s, u
FT,
FT,
FT,
FT.
FT,
FT.
FT.
FT,
FT,
FT.
FT,
FT,
FT.
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
Chemical
Potassium
chr ornate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dichromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dichromate
Potassium
dichromate
Potassium
dichromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dichromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potass! urn
dlchromate
Hardness
(«g/L as
CaCOj)_
20
220
220
220
220
220
220
220
220
220
220
220
220
220
LC50 Species Mean
or EC50 Acute Value
(|ig/L>** (M9/L)**" Reference
45
56
51
53
49
48
60
50
53
49
37
66
55
38
,600
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
Pickering
Henderson,
Adelman
1976
Adelman
1976
Adelman
1976
Adelman
1976
Adelman
1976
- Adelman
1976
Adelman
1976
Adelman
1976
Adelman
1976
Adelman
1976
- Adelman
1976
Adelman
1976
- Adelman
1976
&
&
&
&
&
A
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
1966
Smith,
Smith,
Smith,
Smith,
Smith,
Smith,
Smith,
Smith,
Smith,
Smith,
Smith,
Smith,
Smith,

-------
Table I.  (Continued)
Species
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
u>
O Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Guppy,
Poecllla retlculata
Striped bass,
Morone saxatl 1 Is
Method*
FT,
FT,
FT,
FT,
FT,
FT.
FT.
FT,
FT,
FT,
FT,
FT,
s,
s.
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
U
U
Chemical
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
bichromate
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Sodium
dl chroma te
Potass 1 urn
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
-
-
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Hardness
(mg/L as
CaCOj)
220
220
220
220
220
209
209
209
-
-
400
400
20
35
LC50
or EC50
(ng/L)*»
34,000
29,000
34,000
26.000
33,200
37,700
37,000
35,900
52,000
37 ,000
24,140
22,580
30,000
35,000
Species Mean
Acute Value

-------
Table I.  (Continued)
Species
Striped bass.
Morons saxatl 1 Is
Green sun fish,
Lepomls cyanellus
Green sun fish,
Lepomls cyanellus
Blueglll,
Lepomls macrochlrus
B 1 ueq 1 1 1 ,
Lepomls macrochlrus
Blueqlll,
Lepomls macrochlrus
B 1 ueg 1 1 1 ,
Lepomls macrochlrus
Blueqlll,
Lepomls macrochlrus
Blueglll,
Lepomls macrochlrus
Blueglll,
Lepomls macrochlrus
Blueglll,
Lepomls macrochlrus
Blueqlll,
Lepomls macrochlrus
Blueglll,
Lepomls macrochlrus
Method*
S. U
FT, M
FT, M
S, U
S, U
S. U
S, U
S, U
S, U
S, U
S. U
S, U
S, U
Hardness
(•g/L as
Chemical CaCO,)
Potassium 35
dlchr ornate
Potassium 400
dlchr ornate
Potassium 400
dl chroma te
Potassium 20
dl chroma te
Potassium 360
dl chroma te
Potassium 45
bichromate
Potassium 45
chromate
Potassium 44
d| chromate
Potassium * 44
dl chromate
Potassium 44
dlchr ornate
Potassium 44
chromate
Potassium 44
chromate
Potassium 44
chromate
LC50 Species Mean
or EC50 Acute Value

-------
Table I.  (Continued)
Species
Blueglll,
Lepomls macroch 1 rus
Blueglll,
Lepomls macroch 1 rus
Blueglll,
Lepomis macroch 1 rus
Blueglll,
Lepomls macroch 1 rus
White crapple,
Pomoxls annul arts
Johnny darter,
Etheostoma nlorum
Yel low perch,
Perca flavescens
Worm,
Mais sp.
Sna i 1 ( embryo) ,
Amnlcola sp.
Snail (adult),
Amnlcola sp.
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Method*
*«WW_mB
S. U
s, u
S, M
FT, M
S, M
S, M
S, M
S, M
S, M
S, M
S, U
S, M
S, M
Chemical
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Chromic
chloride
Chromic
n 1 trate
Chromic
nitrate
Hardness
(«g/L as
CaCO,)
171
171
120-160
20-44
120-160
120-160
120-160
Chromlum(lll)
50
50
50
52
99
LC50 Species Mean
or EC50 Acute Value
135,000
130,400
144.500
132,890fttt 132,900
72,600 72,600
46,000 46,000
36,300 36,300
9,300 9,300
12,400
8,400 10,210
1 ,200
16,800
27,400
Reference
Academy of Natural
Sciences, 1960
Academy of Natural
Sciences, 1960
White, Manuscript
Cairns, et al .
1981
White, Manuscript
White, Manuscript
White, Manuscript
Rehwoldt, et al .
1973
Rehwoldt, et al .
1973
Rehwoldt, et al.
1973
Anderson, 1948
Chapman, et al .
Manuscript
Chapman, et al .
Manuscript

-------
Table 1.  (Continued)
CO
Species
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Amp hi pod,
Gammarus sp.
Crayfish,
Orconectes limosus
Mayfly,
Ephemeral la subvarla
Damsel fly,
(Unidentified)
Caddlsfly,
Hydropsyche bettenl
Caddisfly,
(Unidentified)
Midge,
Chlronomus sp.
American eel,
Angullla rostrata
Rainbow trout (2 tnos).
Sal mo gal rdnerl
Rainbow trout.
Sal mo gal rdnerl
Rainbow trout,
Salmo qalrdnerl
Goldfish,
Carassius auratus
Method*
S, M
s.
s.
s,
s,
s,
s.
S.
S.
s,
s,
FT,
s,
FT,
s.
M
M
M
M
U
M
U
M
M
M
M
U
M
U
Hardness
(ng/L as
Chemical CaC03>
Chromic 1)0
nitrate
Chromic 195
nitrate
Chromic 215
nitrate
50
Chromium
chloride
Chromic 44
chloride
- , 50
Chromic 44
chloride
50
50
55
Chromic
nitrate
Chromium 44
Chloride
Chromi urn 26
nitrate
Chromium 20
potassium sulfate
LC50
or EC50

-------
Table I.  (Continued)
Species Method*
Common carp, S, M
Cyprlnus carplo
Fathead minnow, S, U
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow, S, U
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow, FT, M
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow, FT, M
Plmephales promelas
Banded kllllflsh, S, M
Fundulus dlaphanus
Guppy, S, U
Poecllla retlculata
White perch, S, M
Morone amerlcana
Striped bass, S, M
Morone saxatl 1 Is
Pumpklnseed, S, M
Lepomls glbbosus
Blueglll, S, U
Lepomls macrochlrus
Bluegll 1, S, U
Lepomls macrochlrus
-
Chemical
-
Chromium
potassium sul
Chromium
potassium sul
Chromium
potassium sul
Chromium
potassium sul
Hardness
(mg/L as
CaCO»)

fate
fate
fate
fate
Chromium
potassium sul fate
Chromium
potassium sul fate
Chromium
potassium sul fate
SALTWATER
55
20
360
203
203
55
20
55
55
55
. 20
360
SPECIES
LC50
or EC50
14,300
5,070
67,400
29,000
27,000
16,900
3.330
14,400
17,700
17,000
7.460
71.900
Species Mean
Acute Value
13,230
-
-
-
10,320
15,630
7,053
13,320
16,370
15,720
15,020
Reference
Rehwoldt, et al .
1972
Pickering &
Henderson, 1966
Pickering &
Henderson, 1966
Pickering,
Manuscript
Pickering,
Manuscript
Rehwoldt, et al .
1972
Pickering &
Henderson, 1966
Rehwoldt, et al.
1972
Rehwoldt, et al .
1972
Rehwoldt, et al .
1972
Pickering 4
Henderson, 1966
Pickering &
Henderson, 1966
Chromlum(VI )
Polychaete worm, S, M
Neanthes arenaceodentata
Potassium
dl chroma to
3,100
3,100
Mearns, et al . 19

-------
Table 1.  (Continued)
Species
Sand worm.
Nereis vlrens
Polychaete worm,
Ophryotrocha dladema
Pol ychaete norm,
Ctendrllus serratus
Polychaete worm (larva).
Cap! tell a capltata
Polychaete worm (adult).
Capital la capltata
Mud snal 1 ,
Nassarius obsoletus
Blue mussel (embryo),
Mytilus edulis
u>
01 Pacific oyster,
Crassostrea qlqas
Common ranqla.
Rang la cuneata
Common ranqla,
Ranqla cuneata
Sof t-shel 1 clam,
Mya arenarla
Copepod,
Pseudodlaptomus coronatus
Cop epod ,
Acartla clausl
Mysld.
Mysldopsis bah la
Method*
i i. "•
S. U
s, u
s. u
s. u
s. u
s. u
s. u
s, u
s. u
s, u
s, u
s, u
s, u
S, M
Hardness
(mg/L as
Chemical CaCOj)
Potassium
chromate
Chromium
tr loxlde
Chromium
trloxlde
Chromium
trloxlde
Chromium
trloxlde
Potassium
chr ornate
Potassium
dl chromate
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
di chromate
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
chromate
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
dlchr ornate
LC50
or EC50
(ng/L)«*
2,000
7,500
4.300
8,000
5,000
105.000
4,469
4,538
14,000
35,000
57,000
3,650
6.600
2,030
Species Mean
Acute Value
2,000
7,500
4,300
6.325
105.000
4,469
4,538
22,140
57,000
3,650
6,600
2,030
Reference
Elsler & Hennekey,
1977
Reish & Carr, 1978
Ralsh & Carr, 1978
Reish, et al . 1976
Reish, et al . 1976
Elsler 4 Hennekey.
1977
Martin, et al. 1981
Martin, et al . 1981
Olson & Harrel , 1973
Olson 4 Harrel, 1973
Elsler & Hennekey,
1977
Gentile, 1982
Gentile. 1982
Lussler, et al .
Manuscript

-------
      Table 1.   (Continued)
a*
Species                      Method*        Chemical

Mysid,                        S, M          Potassium
Mysldopsls bI gel owl                         dichrornate

Hermit crab,                  S, U          Potassium
Paqurus  long I carpus                         chrornate

Dunqeness crab,               S, U          Potassium
Cancer maqlster                             dlchromate

Blue crab,                    S, U          Potassium
Calllnectes sapldus                         dlchromate

Blue crab,                    S, U          Potassium
Calllnectes sapldus                         dlchromate

Starfish,                     S, U          Potassium
Aster I as forbesl                            chromate

Mummlchog,                    S, U          Potassium
Fundulus heteroclttus                       chromate

Hummlchog,                    S, U          Potassium
Fundulus heteroc11tus                       chromate

Mummlchog,                    S, U          Potassium
Fundulus heteroc11tus                       chromate

Atlantic sllverslde           S, U          Potassium
(larva),                                    dlchromate
Menldla raenldla

Atlantic sllverslde           S, U          Potassium
(larva),                                    dlchromate
Men id(a mentdta

Atlantic sllverslde           S, U          Potassium
(juvenile),                                 dlchromate
Menldla menldla

Tidewater sllverslde,         S, U          Potassium
Menldla penlnsulae                          dlchromate
                                                                   Hardness
                                                                   (rng/L as
                                                                    CaCOQ
 LC50
or EC50
(nq/L)«*

  4.400
 10,000


  3,440


 89.000


 98,000


 32,000


 91,000


 55 ,000


 81,000


 12,400



 14,300



 20,100



 22,000
Species Mean
Acute Value
  (ng/L)«*«

     4,400
Reference

Gentile, 1982
                                                                                                  10,000      Elsler & Hennekey,
                                                                                                              1977

                                                                                                   3,440      Martin, et at. 19BI
                Frank 4 Robertson,
                1979

    93,390      Frank & Robertson,
                1979

    32,000      Elsler & Hennekey.
                1977

                Elsler & Hennekey,
                1977

                Dorfman. 1977
                                                                                                  74,010      Oorfman, 1977
                                                                                                              Card In,  1982
                                                                                                              Card In,  1982
                                                                                                  15,280      Cardln,  1982
                                                                                                  22,000       Hansen,  1983

-------
Table 1.  (Continued)
Species Method*
Spot, S, U
Lelostomus xanthurus
Speckled sanddab, S, U
Clthar Ichthys stlgmaeus
Speckled sanddab, S, U
Clthar Ichthys stlgmaeus
Eastern oyster, S, U
Crassostrea vlrglnica
Mummichoq, S, U
Fundulus heteroclltus
Mummichog, S, U
Fundulus heteroclltus

Hardness LC50 Species Mean
(mg/L as or EC50 Acute Valua
Chemical CaCOj) (Mg/L)** (wg/L)*** Reference
Potassium - 27.000 27,000 Hansen, 1983
dlchromate
Potassium - 31,000 - Sherwood, 1975
dlchromate
Potassium - 30,000 30,500 Mearns, et al . 1976
dlchromate
Chromlumd 1 1 )
Chromium - 10,300 10,300 Calabrese, et al.
chloride 1973
Chromium - 31,500 - Oorfman, 1977
chloride
Chromium - 31,500 31,500 Oorfman, 1977
chloride
*   S = static, R = renewal, FT = flow-through,  U =  unmeasured,  M = measured.

**  Results are expressed as chromium, not as the chemical.

*** For chromlumd11) In fresh water. Species Mean Acute Values  are calculated for a hardness of  50 mg/L using the
    poo I ed si ope.
tt
pH = 8.2 to 8.4.

pH = 7.5 to 7.6.
m pH = 7.5.

        Ished as average of results of two tests,  one at hardness of 20-22 mg/L and one at 42-44 mg/L

-------
        Table I.  (Continued)
                        Results of Covarlance Analysis of Freshwater Acute ToxicIty of Chromlu«(111)  versus Hardness
Species
Daphnla maqna
Fathead minnow
Blueqlll
At 1 of above
n
5
4
2
11
Slope
0.8872
0.8304
0.7839
0.8190*
95 % Confidence Limits
0.6073, 1.1671
0.3641, 1.2968
(cannot be calculated)
0.7088, 0.9290
Degrees of Freedoa
3
2
0
7
                        * P=0.82 for equality of slopes.
u>
00

-------
Table 2.  Chronic Toxlclty of Chromium to Aquatic Animals
Species
Test*
Chemical
Hardness
(mg/L as
CaCO,)
Limits
(Mg/L)««
Chronic
Value
(Mg/L>«*
Reference
FRESHWATER SPECIES
Cladoceran,
Cerlodaphnla retlculata
Cladoceran,
Daphnla maqna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla maqna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla pulex
Cladoceran,
Slmocephalus serrulatus
Cladoceran,
Slmocephalus vetulus
Rainbow trout.
Sal mo qalrdnerl
Rainbow trout.
Sal mo qairdnerl
Brook trout,
Salvellnus fontlnalls
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Cladoceran,
Daphnla maqna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla maqna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla maqna
Rainbow trout,
Salmo qalrdnerl
LC
LC
LC
LC
LC
LC
ELS
ELS
LC
LC
LC
LC
LC
ELS
Sod 1 urn
dlchromate
Sodium
chromate
Sodium
dlchromate
Sodium
dlchromate
Sodium
dlchromate
Sodium
dlchromate
Chromium
trloxlde
Sodium
dlchromate
Sodium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Chromic
nitrate
Chromic
ni trate
Chromic
nitrate
Chromium
nitrate
Chromlum(V) )
45
45
45
45
45
34
45
45
209
Chromlumd 1 1 )
52
100
206
26
25-64
<2.5»*»
4.7-8.0
13.9-28.5
4.7-8.0
51-105
200-350
200-350
1 ,000-
3,950
47-93
129-291
<44«-
30-157
40.00
<2.5
6.132
19.90
6.132
73.18
264.6
264.6
1,987
66.11
193.7
<44
68.63
Mount, 1982
Trabalka & Gehrs, 1977
Mount, 1982
Mount, 1982
Mount, 1982
Mount, 1982
Sauter, et al . 1976
Benolt, 1976
Benolt, 1976
Pickering, 1980
Chapman, et al .
Manuscript
Chapman, et al .
Manuscript
Chapman, et al .
Manuscript
Stevens & Chapman,
1984

-------
Table 2.  (Continued)
Species Test*
Fathead minnow, LC
Plmephales promelas
Polychaete worm LC
(parental generation),
Neanthes arenaceodentata
Polychaete worm LC
(Fj generation),
Neanthes arenaceodentata
Polychaete worm LC
(parental generation),
Neanthes arenaceodentata
Pol ychaete worm LC
(F| generation),
Neanthes arenaceodentata
Polychaete worm LC
(p2 generation) ,
Neanthes arenaceodentata
Mysld, LC
Mysldopsls bah la
Polychaete worm LC
(parental and Fj
generations),
Neanthes arenaceodentata

Hardness Chronic
(mg/L as Units Value
Chemical CaCOj) 50,400 >50,400
chloride
Reference

Pickering, Manuscript
Oshlda & Word, 1982
Oshlda & Word, 1982
Oshlda. et al . 1976,
1981
Oshlda, et al . 1976,
1981
Oshlda, et al . 1976,
1981
Lussler, et al .
Manuscript
Oshlda, et al . 1976,
1981
*  LC = 11fe cycle or partial life cycle, ELS - early life stage.



** Results are expressed as chromium, not as the chemical.



"""Adverse effects occurred at all  concentrations tested.

-------
Table 2.  (Continued)
                                                Acute-Chronic Ratio
Species
Cladoceran,
Cerodaphnla retlculata
Cladoceran,
Oaphnla maqna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla maqna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla pulex
Cladoceran,
Slmocephalus serrulatus
Cladoceran,
Slmocephalus vetulus
Rainbow trout,
Sal mo qalrdnerl
Brook trout,
Salvellnus fontlnalls
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales prometas
Polychaete worm,
Neanthes arenaceodentata
Pol ychaete worm,
Neanthes arenaceodentata
Polychaete worm,
Neanthes arenaceodentata
Pol ychaete worm.
Hardness
(mg/L as Acute Value
CaCOj) (uq/L)
Chromlum(V) )
45 45.2
50
45 24.2
45 36.3
45 40.9
45 32.3
45 69,000
45 59 ,000
209 36,860*
3,100
3,100
3,100
3,100
Chronic Value
(iig/L) Ratio
40.00 1.130
5.000
<2.5 >9.680
6.132 5.920
19.90 2.055
6.132 5.267
264.6 260.8
264.6 223.0
1,987 18.55
25.18 123. I
25.18 123.1
238.5
18.03 171.9
                Neanthes arenaceodentata

-------
Table 2.  (Continued)
                                                 Acute-Chronic Ratio
Hardness
(mg/L as Acute Value Chronic Value
Species CaCO,) l,259
4.400 68.63 64.11
27.980m 1,025 27.30
three flow-throuqh tests from Pickering (1980)
latlon between results of acute tests at
                      hardnesses of 195 and 215  uQ/L  from Chapman,  et  al.  (Manuscript)  in Table  I.



                      Geometric mean of two values from Pickering  (Manuscript)  In Table I.

-------
Table 3.'  Ranked Genus Mean Acute Values  with  Species Mean Acute-Chronic Ratios
Genus Mean
Acute Value
Rank* (pg/L)** Species
FRESHWATER SPECIES
Chromlum(VI)
27 1,870,000 Stonefly,
Neophasqanophora
cap 1 tata
26 176,000 Crayfish,
Orconactes rustlcus
25 140,000 Damsel fly,
Enal lagma aspersum
24 123,500 Green sunflsh,
Lepomls cyanellus
Blueglll,
•P- Lepomls macrochlrus
OJ 	 	 ""
23 119,500 Goldfish,
Carasslus auratus
22 .72,600 White crapple,
Pomoxls annul arts
21 69,000 Rainbow trout,
Salmo gairdneri
20 67,610 Emerald shiner,
Notropls atnerlnoldes
Striped shiner,
Notropls chrysocephalus
Sand shiner,
Notropls stramlneus
19 61,000 Midge,
Species Mean
Acute Value
Cag/L)"
1,870,000
176,000
140,000
114,700
132,900
119,500
72,600
69,000
48,400
85,600
74 ,600
61 ,000
Species Mean
Acute-Chronic
Ratio
260.8
                             Chlronomus  tentans

-------
Table 3.  (Continued)
Rank*
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
II
10
9
8
Genus Mean
Acute Value
WD"
59,000
57,300
51,250
49,600
47,180
46,000
36,300
30,450
30,000
23,010
1,560
Species
Brook trout,
Salvellnus fontinalis
Mldqe,
Tanytarsus dlsslmllis
Central stoneroller,
Campostoma anomalum
SI Iverjaw minnow,
Erlcymba buccata
Bluntnose minnow,
Plmephales notatus
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Johnny darter,
Etheostoma nlgrum
Yel low perch,
Perca flavescens
Striped bass,
Morone saxatl 1 Is
Guppy,
Poecllla retlculata
Snail,
Physa heterostropha
Bryozoan,
Species Mean
Acute Value
59,000
57,300
51,250
49,600
54 ,225
41,050
46,000
36,300
30,450
30,000
23,010
1,560
Species Mean
Acute-Chronic
Ratio
223.0
18.55
                            Lophopodella carterl

-------
                              Table 3.  (Continued)
-P-
Ul
Rank*
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
18
17
16
Genus Mean Species Mean Species Mean
Acute Value Acute Value Acute-Chronic
<(ig/L)»" Species <|ig/L)" Ratio
1,440 Bryozoan, 1,440
Pectinate) la magnlflca
650 Bryozoan, 650
Plumatella emarqlnata
630 Amphlpod, 630
Hyalel la azteca
67.1 Amphlpod, 67.1
Gamroarus pseudol Imnaeus
45.10 Cladoceran. 45.10 1.130
Cer lodaphnla retlculata
36.35 Cladoceran, 40.9 2.055
Slmocephalus serrulatus
Cladocaran, 32.3 5.267
Slmocephalus vetulus
28.94 Cladoceran, 23.07 >6.957f
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran, 36.3 5.920
Daphnla pulex
Chromlum(lll)
71,060 Caddlsfly, 71,060
Hydropsyche bettenl
50,000 Caddlsfly, 50,000
(Unidentified)
43,100 Damselfly, 43,100
(Unidentified)

-------
Table 3.  (Continued)
Rank*
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
Genus Mean
Acute Value
(gg/L)"
16,010
15,630
15,370
14,770
13,230
12,860
1 1 ,000
10,320
10,210
9,669
9,300
8,684
Species
Cladoceran,
Oaphnla magna
Banded kll 1 If ish,
Fundulus dlaphanus
Pumpklnseed,
Lepomls glbbosus
Bluegll I,
Lepomls macrochlrus
Nh 1 te parch ,
Morone amerlcana
Striped bass,
Morone saxatl 1 Is
Common carp,
Cyprlnus carplo
Amer lean eel ,
Angullla rostrata
Midge,
Chlronomus sp.
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Snail,
Amnlcola sp.
Rainbow trout,
Salmo qalr drier 1
Worm,
Nals sp.
Goldfish,
*pecles Mean
Acute Value
(nfl/L)**
16,010
15,630
15,720
15,020
13,320
16,370
13,230
12,860
11,000
10,320
10,210
9,669
9,300
8,684
Species Mean
Acute-Chronic
Ratio
>356.4tf
27.30
64.11
                            Carasslus  auratus

-------
Table 3.  (Continued)
Rank*
3
2
1
21
20
19
IS
17
16
15
14
Genus Mean
Acute Value
7,053
3,200
2,221
105,000
93,390
74,010
57,000
32,000
30,500
27,000
22,140
Species Mean Species Mean
Acute Value Acute-Chronic
Species (ngA>** Ratio
Guppy,
Poecllla retlculata
Amph I pod ,
Gammarus sp.
Mayfly,
Ephemeral la subvarla
SALTWATER SPECIES
ChromlumCVI )
Mud snail,
Nassarlus obsoletus
Blue crab,
Calllnectes sapidus
Mummlchog,
Fundulus heteroclltus
Soft-she) 1 clam,
Mya arenarla
Starfish,
Aster las forbesl
Speckled sanddab,
Clthar Ichthys stlgmaeus
Spot,
Lelostomus xanthurus
Common rang la.
Rang la cuneata
7,053
3,200
2,221
105,000
93,390
74,010
57,000
32,000
30,500
27,000
22,140

-------
                              Table 3.  (Continued)
oo
Rank*
13
12
II
10
9
7
6
5
4
3
Genus Mean
Acute Value
18,330
10,000
7,500
6.600
6,325
4,538
4,469
4,300
3,650
3,440
3,100
Spec las 'Mean
Acute Value
Species <|ig,/L)**
Atlantic silverslde,
Menidia men Id la
Tidewater silverslde,
Menldla penlnsulae
Hermit crab,
Pagurus long! carpus
Polychaete worm,
Ophryotrocha dladema
Cope pod,
Acartla clausl
Polychaete worm,
Capl tell a capltata
Pacific oyster,
Crassostrea qlcjas
Blue mussel ,
Mytllus edul Is
Polychaete worm,
Ctenodrllus serratus
Copepod,
Pseudodlaptomus coronatus
Qungeness crab.
Cancer maglster
Polychaete worm.
15,280
22,000
10,000
7,500
6,600
6,325
4,538
4,469
4,300
3,650
3,440
3,100
Species Mean
Acute-Chronic
Ratio
121.8*™
                                                          Neanthes arenaceodentata

-------
Table 3.  (Continued)
Rank*
2
1
Genus Mean
Acute Value

-------
Table 3.  (Continued)

Chromlum(lll)
Fresh water
     Final Acute Value = 1,968 Mg/L (at a hardness of 50 mg/L)
     Criterion Maximum Concentration =-(1,968 Mg/L)  / 2  = 984.0 Mg/L  (at a  hardness  of  50 mg/L)
          Pooled Slope » 0.8190 (see Table I)
          In(Criterion Maximum Intercept) - ln(984.0) -  (slope  x ln(50)|
                                          =• 6.892 - (0.8190 x 3.912)  = 3.688
     Criterion Maximum Concentration -  e<0.8190|In(hardness)1+3.688)

     Final Chronic Value = 68.63 ug/L (at a hardness of  26 mg/L) (see text)
          Assumed Chronic Slope =• 0.8190 (see text)
          ln(Flnal Chronic Intercept) » ln(68.63) -  (slope x ln(26)l
                                      " 4.229 - (0.8190  x 3.258) = 1.561
     Final Chronic Value = e«0.8190lln(hardness)l+1.561)

-------
Table 4.  Toxic Ity of Chromium to Aquatic Plants
Species
Chemical
Hardness
(Mg/L as
CafXM
Effect
Result
(iig/D*
Reference
FRESHWATER SPECIES
Green alga,
Chlamydomonas relnhardl
Green alga,
Chloral la pyrenoldosa
Green alqa,
Scenedesmus sp.
Blue alga,
Mlcrocystls aeruglnosa
Green alga,
Scenedesmus quadr Icauda
Green alga,
Scenedesmus quadr Icauda
Green alga,
Selenastrum capr Icornutum
Green alga,
Selenastrum capr Icornutum
Green alga,
Selenastrum capr Icornutum
Euglena,
Euglena gracl 1 Is
Diatom,
Cyc 1 ote 1 1 a menegh I n 1 ana
Diatom,
Navlcula semlnulum
Diatom,
Navlcula semlnulum
Diatom,
Navlcula semlnulum
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Sodium
dl chroma te
Sodium
dl chroma te
Potassium
dlchromate
Sodium
chr ornate
Sodium
dlchromate
Sod 1 urn
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Chromlum(VI)
45
53
53
45
45
45
45
Reduction In
growth
50% Inhibition
of growth
Inhibition of
growth
Incipient
Inhibition
Incipient
Inhibition
Inhibition of
growt h
Inhibition of
growth
50f Inhibition of
growth In 4 days
**
Abnormal growth
Growth Inhibition
502 growth
reduction
50$ growth
reduction
50f growth
reduction
10
5,000
500
2
580
500
62
183
> 1,050
1,500
500
187
230
251
Zarafonetls &
Hampton, 1974
Wl urn-Anderson, 1974
Staub, et al. 1973
Brlngmann, 1975; Brlngmann
& Kuhn, 1976, I978a,b
Brlnqmann & Kuhn, I977a,
I978a,b, 1979, I980b
Cairns, et al. 1978
Gar ton, 1973
Rlchter, 1982
Rlchter, 1982
Fasulo, et al . 1983
Cairns, et al . 1978
Academy of Natural
Sciences, I960
Academy of Natural
Sciences, I960
Academy of Natural
Sciences, I960

-------
            Table 4.  (Continued)
Ui
to
Species

Diatom,
Navtcula semi nuturn

Diatom,
Navlcula semlnulum

Diatom,
Navlcula semlnulum

Diatom,
Navlcula semlnulum

Diatom,
Navlcula semlnulum

Diatom,
Navlcula semlnulum

Diatom,
Navlcula semlnulura

Diatom,
Navlcula semlnulum

Diatom,
Navlcula semlnulum

Diatom,
Nltzschla linear Is

Diatom,
Nltzschla linear Is

Diatom,
Nltzschla palea

Diatom,
Nltzschla palea

Eurasian watermllfoll
Hyrlophyllum splcatum
Chemical
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
dl chroma te
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Potass I urn
dlchr ornate
Potassium
d (chroma te
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
chroma te
-
-
Dlchromate***
Hardness
(mg/L as
CaC05)
45
45
45
171
171
171
171
171
171
295
295
-
-
-
Effect
50J growth
reduction
50% growth
reduction
50$ growth
reduction
50< growth
reduction
50 J growth
reduction
501 growth
reduction
50% growth
reduction
50< growth
reduction
50% growth
reduction
LC50 (120 hrs)
LC50 (120 hrs)
50*
of photosynthesis
Inhibition of
growth
32-day EC50
(root weight)
Result

-------
            Table 4.  (Continued)
tn
Species
Green alga,
Selenastrum caprl cor nu turn
Green alga,
Selenastrum caprl cor nutum
Eurasian watermi Ifol 1 ,
Myr lophy 1 lum splcatum
Alga,
Macrocystls pyrlfera
Alqa,
Macrocystls pyrlfera
Hardness
(mg/L as
Che«lcal CaCO,)
Chromlum(lll)
Result
Effect (n9/L)»

Chromium 53 50* Inhibition of 397
chloride growth In 4 days
Chromium 53 «« >l ,000
chloride
32-day EC50 9,900
(root weight)
SALTWATER SPECIES
Chromlum(VI)
Potassium
dl chroma te
50$ Inhibition 5,000
of photosynthesis
In 4 days
10 - 20% Inhlbi- 1,000
tlon of photo-
synthesis In
5 days
Reference
Rlchter, 1982
Rlchter, I9B2
Stanley, 1974
Clendennlng & North,
1959
Bernhard & Zattera,
1975
            *  Results are expressed as chromium, not as the chemical.



            ** Highest concentration that would not have killed a significant number of cells In 5 days.



            """Cation not specified.

-------
Species
Table 5.  Bloaccumulatlon of Chromium by Aquatic Organisms


 Tissue           Chemical
Duration    Bloconcentratlon
 (days)     	Factor*       Reference
Rainbow trout. Muscle
Salmo galrdnerl
Rainbow trout, Whole body
Salmo galrdnerl
Rainbow trout. Muscle
Sal mo galrdnerl
Polychaete worm,
Neanthes arenaceodentata
Polychaete worm,
Neanthes arenaceodentata
Blue mussel. Soft parts
Mytilus edulls
Eastern oyster, Soft parts
Crassostrea vlrglnlca
Bluo mussel. Soft parts
Mytl lus edulls
Eastern oyster. Soft parts
Crassostrea vlrglnlca
Soft-shell clam. Soft parts
Mya arenarla

FRESHWATER SPECIES
Chromlum(VI)
Sod 1 urn 22
dlchromate
Potassium 30
chromate
Potassium 180
dlchromate
SALTWATER SPECIES
Chromlum(VI)
150
146-163
Sodium 84
' dlchromate
Sod lum 84
d Ichromate
Chromium! 1 II )
Chromic 168
chloride
Chromic 140
nitrate
Chromic 168
chloride
<) Buhler, et al. 1977
'.?
1 Fromm & Stokes, 1962
2.8 Calamarl, et al . 1982
200** Mearns & Young, 1977
236 Oshlda & Word, 1982
192** Zarooglan & Johnson,
1983
125** Zarooglan & Johnson,
1983
86** Capuzzo & Sasner,
1977
116 Shuster & Prlngle,
1969
153** Capuzzo & Sasner,
1977
* Results are based on chromium, not the chemical.

""Bloconcentratlon factor was converted from dry weight  to wet weight  basis.

-------
Table 6.  Other Data on Effects of  Chromium on Aquatic Organisms
Species
Algal community
Algal community
Algal community
Algal community
Green alga,
Scenedesmus quadrlcauda
Oi
Cn
Bacteria,
Eschar Ich la col 1
Bacteria,
Pseudomonas putlda
Protozoan,
Entoslphon sulcatum
Protozoan,
Mlcroregma heterostoma
Protozoan,
Chllomonas pa named urn
Protozoan,
Uronema parduezl
Protozoa, '
Blephar Isma sp.
Chemical
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Sodium
dlchromate
Sod 1 urn
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Sod 1 um
dlchromate
Sodium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
dlchromate
Hardness
(mg/L as
CaCOj) Duration
FRESHWATER SPECIES
Chromlum(VI)
1 mo
1 mo
„- 1 mo
25 hrs
96 hrs
16 hrs
72 hrs
28 hrs
48 hrs
20 hrs
3 hrs
Effect
Diatoms reduced
blue green
algae dominant
Diversity of
diatoms reduced
BCF=8,500
32* Inhibition
of photo-
synthesis
Incipient
Inhibition
(river water)
Incipient
Inhibition
Incipient
Inhibition
Incipient
Inhibition
Incipient
Inhibition
Incipient
Inhibition
Incipient
Inhibition
Some living
Result
400
too
20
700
700
380
9,600
20,000
210
0.12
2,100
32,000
Reference

Patrick, et al . 1975
Patrick, et al . 1975
Patrick, et al. 1975
Zarafonetls & Hampton,
1974
Brlngmann & Kuhn,
1959a,b
Brlngmann & Kuhn, 1959 a
Brlngmann & Kuhn, 1976,
1977a, 1979, 1980b
Brlngmann, 1978;
Brlngmann & Kuhn, 1979,
19806, 1981
Brlngmann & Kuhn, 19596
Brlngmann, et al. 1980,
1981
Brlngmann & Kuhn, 1980a
1981
Ruthven 4 Cairns, 1973

-------
     Table 6.  (Continued)
o>
Species
Euglena,
Euglena gracll Is
Rotifer,
Phllodlna acutlcornls

Worm,
Aeolosoma headleyl

Snail,
Gonlobasls llvescens
Sna 1 1 ,
Nltocrls sp.

Snal 1,
Lymnaea emarglnata
Snail,
Physa Integra
Cladoceran,
Paphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Chemical
Chromium
trloxlde
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potass 1 urn
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Hardness
(mg/L as
CaC03) Duration Effect
3 hrs Tolerated
45 48 hrs LC50 (5 C)
(10 C)
(15 C)
(20 C)
(25 C)
45 48 hrs LC50 (5 C)
(10 C)
(15 C)
(20 C)
(25 C)
154 48 hrs LC50
45 48 hrs LC50 (5 C)
(10 C)
(15 C)
(20 C)
(25 C)
154 48 hrs LC50
154 48 hrs LC50
200 24 hrs EC50
86 72 hrs EC50
163 72 hrs EC50
45 48 hrs LC50 (5 C)
(10 C)
(15 C)
(25 C)
Result
1,000
54,000
50,600
39,200
3 1 .000
29,000
12,100
10,000
8,600
7,000
4,800
2,400
9.100
7,800
3,700
1,200
800
34,800
660
1,570
31-44
64-81
7,600
5,600
4,300
560
Reference
Yonque, et al. 1979
Cairns, et al „ 1978
Cairns, et al. 1978
Cairns, et al. 1976
Cairns, et al . 1978
Cairns, et al . 1976
Cairns, et al . 1976
Bel lavere & Gorbl,
1981
Debelak, 1975
Oebelak, 1975
Cairns, et al . 1978

-------
    Table 6.  (Continued)
tn

Species
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla maqna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla maqna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla pulex



Chemical
Chromium
trloxlde
Potassium
dl chroma te
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Sodium
dlchromate
Sodium
dlchromate
Potassium
chromate
Potassium
chromate
Sodium
chromate
Sodium
chromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Sodium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate


Hardness
(mg/L as
CaCO,)


-

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

_

288

45




Duration
16 hrs

16 hrs

48 hrs

96 hrs

48 hrs

96 hrs

48 hrs

96 hrs

48 hrs

96 hrs

48 hrs

24 hrs

48 hrs




Effect
LC50

LC50

EC50 (fed)

EC50 (fed)

EC50 (fed)

EC50 (fed)

EC50 (fed)

EC50 (fed)

EC50 (fed)

EC50 (fed)

EC50 (river
water)
LC50

LC50 (5 C)
(10 C)
(15 C)
(25 C)
Result
(ng/l)*
<3I2

<212

21.6

16.9

19.9

24.5

19.2

7.39

21.1

17.8

700

1,400

4,800
3,200
900
400

Reference
Anderson, 1944

Anderson, 1944

Call, et al. 1981

Cal 1, et al. 1981

Cal 1, et al. 1981

Cal 1, et al. 1981

Call, et al. 1981

Call, et al. 1981

Cal 1. et al. 1981

Cal 1, et al. 1981

Brlnqmann & Kuhn,
1959a,b
Brlngmann & Kuhn, I977b

Cairns, et al . 1978




-------
Table 6.  (Continued)
Species
Cladoceran,
Daphnla pulex
Midge. |
Chlronomus tentans '
»
Coho salmon,
Oneorhynchus klsutch
Coho salmon,
Oncorhynchus klsutch
Coho salmon,
Oncorhynchus klsutch
Coho salmon,
Oncorhynchus klsutch
Ul
00 Coho salmon,
Oncorhynchus klsutch
Coho salmon,
Oncorhynchus klsutch
Coho salmon,
Oncorhynchus klsutch
Chinook salmon,
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha
Chinook salmon,
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha
Chinook salmon
(embryo, finger ling),
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha
Chemical
Potassium
chroma te
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
chromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Sodium
dlchromate
Sodium
dlchromate
Sod 1 urn
dlchromate
Sodium
dlchromate
Sod 1 urn
dlchromate
Sodium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Sodium
dlchromate
Hardness
(mg/L as Result
CaCOj) Duration Effect lj^/U*
44 2 hrs Death (after
22 hours)
101 1.5 hrs Supressed
respiration
13 days LC50 . 25
90 144 hrs 100* survival 5
60 14 days Mortality after
transfer to 30
g/kg sqawater
60 14 days Mortality after
transfer to 20
g/kg seawater
60 26 days Mortality after
transfer to 20
g/kg seawater
60 2 wks Decreased disease
resistance
60 2 wks Immunosuppreslon
70 7 mos Reduced growth
12 wks Reduced growth
and survival
70 42 days No effect on
survival In
22 wks
100
100
,000
,000
520
480
230
500
470
16
200
174
Reference
Lee & Bulkema, 1979
Batac-Catalan & White,
1983
Holland, et al . 1960
Lorz, et a! . 1978
Sugatt, !980a
Sugatt, 1980 a
Sugatt, 1980 a
Sugatt, 1980b
Sugatt, I980b
Olson & Foster, 1956
Olson, 1958
Olson A Foster, 1957

-------
     Table 6.   (Continued)
Cn
VO
     Species

     Chinook  salmon  (tIngerlIng),
     Oncorhynchus  tshawytscha

     Chinook  salmon  (finger I Ing),
     Oncorhynchus  tshawytscha

     Rainbow  trout (embryo,  larva),
     Salmo qalrdnerl

     Rainbow  trout (embryo,  larva),
     Salmo galrdnerl

     Rainbow  trout,
     Salmo galrdnerl
Rainbow trout,
Salmo galrdnerl

Rainbow trout,
Salmo galrdnerl

Rainbow trout
(larva, finger!Ing),
Salmo galrdnerl

Rainbow trout,
Salmo galrdnerl

Rainbow trout,
Salmo galrdnerl

Rainbow trout,
Salmo galrdnerl

Rainbow trout,
Salmo galrdnerl

Rainbow trout,
Salmo galrdnerl
     Rainbow  trout  (adult),
     Salmo galrdnerl
                                 Chemical

                                  Sodium
                                dIchromate

                                  Sodium
                                d(chromate

                                 Chromium
                                 trloxlde

                                 Chromium
                                 trloxlde

                                 Potassium
                                dIchromate
 Potassium
dlchromate

Hexavalent
 chromium

  Sodium
dlchromate
                                      Potassium
                                      chromate

                                      Potassium
                                      chromate

                                      Potassium
                                     dlchromate

                                      Potass I urn
                                     dlchromate

                                      Potassium
                                     dlchromate
                                 Potassium
                                dlchromate
                  Hardness
                  (ing/L  as
                   CaC03)

                      70
 70


101


101


 36



 70





 70



334


334





 27


 27



320
Duration

   74 days


   74 days


   28 days


   28 days


   24 hrs



    7 days


    2 days


   16 wks



   24 hrs


   24 hrs


   15 days


   15 days


 15-22 days



    6 mos
                            Effect
                 Result
                 (ng/D*
47$ reduction        95
In growth at 10'C

40< reduction        91
In growth at 5*C

EC50 (death and     190
deformity)

ECIO (death and
deformity)

LC50  (5 C)      58,900
     (15 C)     141,000
     (30 C)      95,500

Plasma               20
"cortlsol"
                                                                                     Inhibited
                                                                                     Na/K-ATPase
                  2,500


Reduced growth       21
       Reference

       Olson & Foster, 1957


       Olson & Foster, 1957


       Blrge, et al. 1980


56.9   Blrge, et al. 1981


       Cairns, et al. 1978



       Hill & Frown, 1968


       Kuhnert, et al. 1976


       bison & Foster, 1956
                                                Hematocrlts       2,000     Schlffman & Fromm,  1959
                                                LC50
                                                Death
                100,000     Schlffman & Fromm, 1959
                  10,000     Strlk, et al. 1975
                                                25J mortality    10,000     Strlk,  et al.  1975
                                                Alteration of
                                                some blood
                                                parameters
                  10,000
                                               Decrease  of  total   200
                                                IIver  glucldes  In
                                               males
       Strlk, et al. 1975
                            Arlllo, et al. 1982

-------
    Table 6.   (Continued)
ON
O
    Species                          Chemical

    Rainbow trout  (adult),           Potassium
    Salmo qalrdnerl                  dlchromate
Rainbow trout (yearling).         Sodium
Sal mo galrdnerl                  chromate

Rainbow trout (yearling).         Sodium
Salmo qalrdneri                  chromate

Rainbow trout (yearling).         Sodium
Sal mo qalrdnerl                  chromate

RaInbow 'trout (year 11ng),         Sod I urn
Salmo galrdnerl                  chromate

Rainbow trout                     Sodium
(eyed embryo, juvenile),         chromate
Salmo qalrdnerl           ,

Rainbow trout                     Sodium
(eyed embryo, juvenile),         chromate
Salmo galrdnerl

Rainbow trout                     Sodium
(eyed embryo, juvenile),         chromate
Salmo galrdnerl

RaInbow . trout                     Sod Iurn
(eyed embryo, juvenile),         chromate
Salmo galrdnerl

Rainbow trout                     Sodium
(alevln, juvenile),              chromate
Salmo galrdnerl

Rainbow trout                     Sodium
(alevln. Juvenile),              chromate
Salmo galrdnerl
Hardness
(ing/L as
CaCOj)
320
60
BO
80
80
80
Duration
6 mos
96 hrs
96 hrs
96 hrs
96 hrs
32 wks
                                                                                 Effect
                                                                                                     Result
                                                          80
                                                          80
                                                          80
                                                          80
                                                          80
32 wks
32 wks
32 wks
32 wks
32 wks
                                                                               'Increase In liver   200
                                                                                proteolytlc acti-
                                                                                vity of males
                                                                                    25f survival
                                                                                    (pH 6.5)

                                                                                    63f survival
                                                                                    (pH 7.8)

                                                                                    0% survival
                                                                                    (pH 6.5)

                                                                                    501 survival
                                                                                    (pH 7.8)

                                                                                    OS survival
                                                                                    (pH 6.5)
32S survival
(pH 7.8)
40Jt survival
(pH 6.5)
76$ survival
(pH 7.8)


0£ survival
(pH 6.5)
44J( survival
(pH 7.8)
16,500


16,500


50,000


50,000


 2,000



 2,000



   200



   200



 2,000
                                          Reference

                                          AM Ho. et al. 1982
                                          van der Putte, et al
                                          1981

                                          van der Putte, et al,
                                          1981

                                          van der Putte, et al,
                                          1981

                                          van der Putte, et al,
                                          1981

                                          van der Putte, et al,
                                          1982
van der Putte, et al,
1982
van der Putte, et al,
1982
van der Putte, et al,
1982
van der Putte, et al,
1982
 2,000     van der Putte, et al
           1982

-------
Table 6.  (Continued)
Species
Rainbow trout
(alevln, juvenile),
Sal mo qalrdnerl
Rainbow trout
(alevln, juvenile), i
Salmo qalrdnerl
Rainbow trout,
Sal mo qalrdnerl
Rainbow trout,
Salmo qalrdnerl
Brown trout (yearling),
Salmo trutta
Goldfish.
Car ass 1 us auratus
Goldfish (embryo, larva),
Carasslus auratus
Goldfish (juvenile) ,
Carasslus auratus

Goldfish (juvenile),
Carasslus auratus
Common carp (adult),
Cyprlnus carplo
Golden shiner,
Noterolgonus crysoleucas
Fathead minnow,
Plmephales promelas
Chemical
Sod 1 urn
chroma te
Sodium
chromate
-
Sodium
chromate
Potassium
dl chromate
Potassium
dl chromate
Chromium
trl oxide
Potassium
dl chromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Hardness
(ng/L as
CaCOi) Duration
80 32
80 32
4
80 II
207 38
220 II
195 7
36 24
24
207 38
36 24
220 II
wks
wks
mos
days
wks
days
days
hrs
hrs
wks
hrs
days
Effect
72< survival
(pH 6.5)
16% survival
(pH 7.8)
No effect on
Immune response
Induced
hyperplasla
Suppression of
Immune response
LC50
EC50 (death and
deformity)
LC50 (5 C)
(15 C)
(30 C)
LC50
Suppression of
Immune response
LC50 (5 C)
(15 C)
(30 C)
LC50
Result
(ng/L)»
200
200
200
3,200
1,010
30,400
660
354 ,000
213,000
109,000
249,000
1,010
151,000
109,000
104,000
17,300
Reference
van der
1982
van der
1982
Vlale &
Temmlnk
O'Neill
Adelman
Blrge,
Cairns,
Oowden
O'Neill
Cairns,
Adelman
Putte, et al .
Putte, et al.
Calamarl, 1984
, et al . 1983
, 1981
& Smith, 1976
1978
et al. 1978
& Bennett, 1965
, 1981
et al . 1978
& Smith, 1976

-------
     Table 6.   (Continued)
CT>
Species
Channel catfish (juvenile),
Ictalurus punctatus
Mosqul tof Ish,
Gambusla afflnls
Mosqul tof Ish,
Gambusla afflnls
Mosqul tof Ish,
Gambusla afflnls
Mosqul tof Ish,
Gambusla afflnls
Blueglll,
Lepomls macrochlrus
Blueglll,
Lepomls macrochlrus
Blueglll,
Lepomls macrochlrus
Bluegll 1,
Lepomls macrochlrus
Bluegll 1,
Lepomls macrochlrus
B 1 ueg III, 1
Lepomls macrochlrus
Largemouth bass
(embryo, larva),
Mlcropterus sal mo Id as
Largemouth bass (juvenile),
Mlcropterus salmoldes
Chemical
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Sodium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
chromate
Sodium
chromate
Potassium
dl chroma te
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Potassium
dl chromate
Potass I urn
dlchr ornate
Sodium
dl chromate
Potassium
dl chroma te
Chromium
trl oxide
Potassium
chromate
Hardness
(ing/L as
CaCO^) Duration
36 24 hrs
96 hrs
96 hrs
96 hrs
96 hrs
36 24 hrs
24 hrs
43 96 hrs
43 48 hrs
120 48 hr
105 2 wks
99 8 days
334 36 hrs
Effect
LC50 (5 C)
(15 C)
(30 C)
LC50 (high
turbidity)
LC50 (high
turbidity)
LC50 (high
turbidity)
LC50 (high
turbidity)
LC50 (5 C)
(15 C)
(30 C)
LC50
LC50 (low
dissolved
oxygen)
LC50
LC50
Increased loco-
motor activity
EC50 (death and
deformity)
Pathology of
Intestine
Result
»
50,000
58,000
99,000
92,000
107,000
135,000
228,000
280,000
214,000
261,000
113,000
155,500
213,000
50
1,170
94,000
Reference
Cairns, et al. 1978
Wai ten, et al. 1957
Mai ten, et al. 1957
Wall en, et al. 1957
Wallen, et al. 1957
Cairns, et al . 1978
Oowden & Bennett, 1965
Cairns & Scholar, 1958
Cairns, ef al. 1965
Turnbull, et al . 1954
Ellgaard, et al . 1978
Blrge, et al . 1978
Fromm & Schiffman, 1958

-------
      Table 6.   (Continued)
u>
Species
Largemouth bass (juvenile),
Mlcropterus salmoldes
Narrow-mouthed toad
(embryo, larva),
Gastrophryne carol Inensls
Marbled salamander
(embryo, larva),
Ambystoma opacum
Green alga,
Scenedesmus quadricauda
Protozoan,
Mlcroregma heterostoma
I
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna

Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Cladoceran,
Daphnla magna
Rainbow trout.
Sal mo galrdnerl

Chemical
Potassium
chromate
Chromium
trloxlde
Chromium
trloxlde
Potass 1 urn
chromium
sulfate
Potassium
chromium
: sulfate
Potassium
chromium
sulfate
Potassium
chloride
sul fate
Chromium
chloride
Chromium
chloride
Chromium
chloride
Hardness
(Mg/L as
CaCO^) Duration
334 48 hrs
195 7 days
99 8 days
Chromium! 1 1 1 )
96 hrs
28 hrs
48 hrs
24 hrs
45 3 wks
45 -- 3 wks
30 days
Effect
LC50
EC50 (death and
deformity)
EC50 (death and
deformity
Incipient
Inhibition
(river- water)
Incipient
Inhibition
EC50 (river
water)
LC50
LC50
Impaired
reproduction
No effect on
gill AChE
activity
Result
(ng/D*
195,000
30
2,130
5,000
37,000
42,000

2,000
330
1,000
Reference
Fromm & Schlffman, 1958
Blrge, 1978
Blrge, et al . 1978
Brlngmann & Kuhn, 1959a,b
Brlngmann & Kuhn, 1959b
Brlngmann & Kuhn, I959a.b
Brlngmann & Kuhn, I977b
Bleslnger &
Christen sen, 1972
Bleslnger &
Chrlstensen, 1972
Smlssaert, et al. 1975
     Rainbow  trout,
     Salmo galrdnerl
56 days
                                                                                     None
6 mg/kg    Tacon and Beverldge, 1982
In food

-------
Table 6.   (Continued)
Species

Common carp,
Cyprlnus carpIo

Common carp,
Cyprlnus carplo
Chemical

 Chromium
 sutfate

 Chromium
 chloride
                                                  Hardness
                                                  fng/L as
                                  Result
Duration          Effect          (tig/L)*    Reference

   48 hrs        60J mortality     2,900     Muramoto, 1981


   24 hrs        lOOjf mortality    3.900     Muramoto, 1981
Polychaete worm                   Chromium
(juvenile),                       trloxlde
Neanthes arenaceodentata

Polychaete worm (adult).          Chromium
Neanthes arenaceodentata          trloxlde

Polychaete worm,                 Potassium
Neanthes arenaceodentata        dIchrornate

Polychaete worm.                 Potassium
Neanthes arenaceodentata        dIchromate

Polychaete worm.                 Potassium
Neanthes arenaceodentata        dlchromate

Polychaete worm.                 Potassium
Neanthes arenaceodentata        dlchromate

Polychaete worm.                 Potassium
Neanthes arenaceodentata        dlchromate

Polychaete worm.                  Sodium
Nereis vlrens                    chromate

Polychaete worm,                 Potassium
Nereis vlrens                    chromate

Polychaete worm.                 Chromium
Ophryotrocha dladeraa             trloxlde
                        SALTWATER SPECIES

                          Chromlum(VI)

                                 28 days



                                 28 days


                                  7 days


                                 56 days


                                 14 days


                                 59 days


                                350 days


                                 21  days


                                  7 days


                                 21  days
                 LC50



                 LC50  .


                 LC50


                 LC50
  700
Relsh, et al. 1976
  550     Relsh, et al. 1976
1,460-    Oshlda, et al. 1976,
1.770     1981

  200     Oshlda & Relsh, 1975
                 Inhibition-tube      79     Oshlda & Relsh, 1975
                 building
                 LC50
                 Brood size
                 decrease

                 LC50
  200     Maarns, et al. 1976


   12.5   Maarns, et al. 1976


1,000     Raymont & Shields,  1963
                 LC50                700     Elsler & Hennekey, 1977


                 100* mortality   50,000     Relsh i Carr,  1978

-------
       Table 6.  (Continued)
Oi
Species
Polychaete worm,
Ophryotrocha dladema
Polychaete worm,
Ophryotrocha dladema
Polychaete worm,
Ctenodrllus serratus
Polychaete worm (adult),
Capital la capltata
Polychaete worm (adult).
Capital la capltata
Mud snail,
Nassarlus obsoletus
Pacific oyster,
Crassostrea glgas
Common rang la.
Rang la cuneata
Soft-shell clam,
Mya arenarla
Copepod,
Acartla clausl
Copepod,
Acartla clausl
Copepod ,
Tlsbe holothurlae ,
Grass shrimp,
Palaemonetes puglo
Grass shrimp,
Palaemonetes puqlo
Chemical
Chromium
trloxlde
Potassium
dlchr ornate
Chromium
trloxlde
Chromium
trloxlde
Potassium
dl chromate
Potassium
chromate
Sodium
dl chromate
Potassium
dl chromate
Potassium
chromate
Sodium
chromate
Sodium
chromate
Sodium
chromate
Potassium
chromate
Potassium
chromate
Hardness
(mg/L as
CaCO*) Duration
28 days
48 hrs
21 days
28 days
5 mos
7 days
48 hrs
96 hrs
7 days
48 hr
7 days
48 hrs
48 hrs
48 hrs
Effect
Brood size
decrease
LC50
100| mortality
LC50
Brood size
decrease
LC50
No effect
LC50 «l g/kg
salinity)
LC50
LC50
Decreased 4
1 1 fe span 5
LC50
LC50
(10 C, 10 g/kg
sal Inlty)
LC50
(15 C, 10 g/kg
Result
(MQ/L)«
500-
1,000
1 ,000-
3,300
50,000
280
50-
100
10.000
100
210
8,000
13,700
,000 (14 C)
,000 (22 C)
8,140
81 ,000
39,000
Reference
Relsh & Carr, 1978
Parker, 1984
Relsh & Carr, 1978
Relsh, et al . 1976
Relsh, 1977
Elsler & Hennekey, 1977
Mat! Ing, 198ta
Olson & Harrel, 1973
Elsler & Hennekey, 1977
Moral tou-Aposto 1 opou 1 ou
& Verrlopoulos, 1982b
Mora Itou-Apos to 1 opou lou
& Verrlopoulos, J982b
Mora 1 tou-Aposto 1 opou 1 ou
& Verrlopoulos, I982a
Pales, 1978
Fales, 1978
                                                                                      salinity)

-------
     Table 6.  (Continued)
ON
Species
Grass shrimp,
Palaemonetes puglo
Grass shrimp,
Palaemonetos puglo
Grass shrimp,
Palaemonetes puqlo
Grass shrimp,
Palaemonetes puqlo
Grass shrimp,
Palaemonetes puglo
Grass shrimp,
Palaemonetes puglo
Grass shrimp,
Palaemonetes puglo
Hermit crab,
Paqurus lonolcarpus
Blue crab ( larva) ,
Calllnectes sapldus
Blue crab,
Calllnectes sapldus
Green crab,
Carclnus maenas
Mud crab ( larva) ,
Rh 1 thropanopeus harr 1 s 1 1

Chemical
Potassium
chromate
Potass 1 urn
chromate
Potassium
chromate
Potassium
chronate
Potassium
chromate
Potassium
chromate
Sodium
chromate
Potassium
chromate
Sodium
chromate
Potassium
dlchromate
Sodium
chromate
Sodium
chromate
Hardness
(mg/L as
CaCO.) Duration
• - 48 hrs
48 hrs
48 hrs
48 hrs
48 hrs
48 hrs
28 days
7 days
40 days
96 hr
12 days
19 days
Effect
LC50
(20 C, 10 q/kg
salinity)
LC50
(25 C, 10 g/kg
salinity)
LC50
(10 C, 20 g/kg
salinity)
LC50
(15 C, 20 g/kg
salinity)
LC50
(20 C, 20 g/kg
salinity)
LC50
(25 C, 20 g/kg
salinity)
Cutlcular
lesions;
perclopod loss
LC50
Reduced
survival
LC50 (1 q/kg
salinity)
LC50
Reduced
survival;
affected
swimming
Result
CiigA)*
37,000
21,000
147,000
107,000
78,000
77,000
500-
4,000
2,700
1,500
34,000
60,000
2,290
Reference

Fales, 1978
Fales, 1978
Fales, 1978
Fales, 1978
Fales, 1978
Fales, 1978
Doughtle, et al . 1983
Elsler & Hennekey, 1977
Bookhout, et al . 1984
Frank & Robertson, 1979
Raymont & Shields. 1963
Bookhout, et al . 1984

-------
Table 6.  (Continued)
Species

Starfish,
Aster I as forbesl

Brittle star,
Ophlothrlx splculata

Coho salmon,
Oncorhynchus klsutch

Coho salmon,
Oncorhynchus klsutch

Mummlchoq,
Fundulus heteroclltus

Speckled sanddab,
Cltharlchthys stlgmaeus

Speckled sanddab,
Cttharlchthys stlgmaeus

Speckled sanddab,
Cltharlchthys stlgmaeus
Polychaete worm,
Neanthas arenaceodentata

Polychaete worm,
Neanthes arenaceodentata
Polychaete worm,
Ophryotrocha dladema
 Chemical

 Potassium
 chrornate
 Potassium
 chromato

 Potassium
 chromate

 Potassium
 chromate

 Potassium
dIchrornate

 Potassium
dlchromate

 Potassium
dlchromate
  Chromium
  chloride

  Chromium
  chloride
  Chromium
 trichloride
Hardness
(«g/L as
 CaCOQ
    Duration

        7 days


        7 days


        5 days


       II days


        7 days


       21 days


       21 days


       21 days


Chromtum(lll)

      <24 hrs


      160 days



       48 hrs
 Effect

LC50


LC50
Result
(iig/L)*    Reference

10,000     Elsler & Hennekey, 1977
                                                                  1,700     Oshlda & Wright, 1978
                              33$ mortality    31,800     Holland, et al. I960
                              100$ mortality   31,800     Holland, et al. I960
                              LC50             44.000     Elsler & Hennekey. 1977
                              LC50              5,400     Sherwood, 1975
                              EC50 (fed)        2,200     Sherwood.  1975
                              LC50              5,000     Mearns. et al.  1976
                              100$ mortality   50,400
                              (pH=4.5)
                              Reproduction
                              occurred
                              (pH=7.9)

                              LC50
                 50,400
           Oshlda, et  al.  1976,
           1981

           Oshlda, et  al.  1976,
           1981
                100,000     Parker,  1984
*  Results are expressed as chromium, not as the chemical.

-------
                                   REFERENCES









Academy of Natural Sciences.  1960.  The sensici.vi.cy of aquatic life co certain




chemicals commonly found in industrial wasces.  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.









Adelman, I.R. and L.L. Smith, Jr.  1976.  Standard test fish development. Pare




1. fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and goldfish (Carassius auracus) as




standard fish in bioassays and their reaction to potential reference toxicants.




EPA-600/3-76-061a.  National'Technical Information Service, Springfield,




Virginia.








Ahsanullah, M.  1982.  Acute coxicity of chromium, mercury, molybdenum  and




nickel co the amphipod Allorchestes compressa.  Aust. Jour. Mar. Freshwater  Res




33: 465.                                                                       ,








Anderson, B.G.  1944.  The coxicity thresholds of various substances found in




industrial wastes as determined by the use of Daphnia magna.  Sew. Works Jour.




16: 1156.








Anderson, B.G.  1946.  The toxicicy thresholds of various sodium sales




determined by the use of Daphnia aagna.  Sew. Works Jour. 18: 82.









Anderson, B.G.  1948.  The apparent thresholds of coxicity co Daphnia magna  for




chlorides of various metals when added co Lake Erie water.  Trans. Am.  Fish.




Soc. 78: 96.
                                       68

-------
Arillo, A., ec al.  1982.  Biochemical effaces of long cerra exposure co  Cr,  Cd,




Ni on rainbow trouc (Salmo gairdneri Rich.): influence of sex and season.




Chemosphere 11: 47.








Babich, H., ec al.  1982.  Comparacive toxicicy of trivalenc and hexavalenc




chromium co fungi.  Bull. Environ. Concam. Toxicol. 28: 452.








Bacac-Cacalan,. Z. and D.S. Whice.  1983.  Effecc of chromium on larval chirono-




midae as decermined by che opcical-fiber lighc-incerrupcion biomonicoring




syscem.  In; W.E. Bishop, ec al. (eds.), Aquacic Toxicology and Hazard Assess-




raenc: Sixch Symposium.  ASTM STP 802.  American Sociecy for Testing and




Macerials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,  p. 469.








Baudouin, M.F. and P. Scoppa.  1974.  Accumulacion and recencion of chroraium-51




by freshwater zooplankcon.  EUR 5160.  Commission of che European Communities,




Brussels, Belgium.








Bellavere, C. and J. Gorbi.  1981.  A comparative analysis of acuce coxicicy of




chromium, copper and cadmium co Daphnia magna, Biomphalaria glabraca, and




Brachydanio rerio.  Environ. Technol. Leccers 2: 119.








Benoic, D.A.  1976.  Toxic effeccs of hexavalenc chromium on brook crouc




(Salvelinus foncinalis) and rainbow crouc (Salmo gairdneri).  Wacer Res. 10:




497.
                                       69

-------
Berglind, R. and G. Dave.  1984.  Acute toxicity of chromace, DDT, PGP, TPBS,




and zinc to Daphnia magna cultured in hard and soft water.  Bull. Environ.




Contam. Toxicol. 33: 63.








Bernhard, M. and A. Zattera.  1975.  Major pollutants in the marine environment.




In_; E.A. Pearson and E.D. Frangipane (eds.),  Marine Pollution and Marine Waste




Disposal.  Pergamon Press, New York.  p. 195.








Biesinger, K.E. and G.M. Christensen.  1972.   Effects of various metals on




survival, growth, reproduction, and metabolism of Daphnia magna.  Jour. Fish.




Res. Board Can. 29: 1691.









Bills, T.D., et al.  1977.  Effects of residues of the polychlorinated biphenyl




Aroclor 1254 on the sensitivity of rainbow trout to selected environmental




contaminants.  Prog. Fish-Cult. 39: 150.








Birge, W.J.  1978.  Aquatic toxicology of trace elements of coal and fly ash.




In: J.H. Thorpe and J.W. Gibbons (eds.), Energy and Environmental Stress in




Aquatic Systems.  CONF-771114.  National Technical Information Service,




Springfield, Virginia,  p. 219.









Birge, W.J., et al.  1978.  Embryo-larval bioassays on inorganic coal elements




and in situ biomonitoring of coal-waste effluents.  In: D.E. Samuel, et al.




(eds.), Surface Mining and Fish/Wildlife Needs in the Eastern United States.




PB 298353.  National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.




p. 97.



                                       70

-------
Birge, W.J., ec al.  1980.  Aquatic coxicicy cescs on inorganic elements




occurring in oil shale.  In; C. Gale (ed.), Oil Shale Symposium: Sampling,




Analysis and Quality Assurance.  EPA-600/9-80-022.  National Technical




Information Service, Springfield, Virginia,  p. 519.








Birge, W.J., et al.  1981.  The reproductive toxicology of aquatic contaminants.




In; J. Saxena and F. Fisher (eds.), Hazard Assessment of Chemicals: Current




Developments.  Vol. 1.  Academic Press, New York.  p. 59.








Bookhout, C.6., et al.  1982.  Effects of soluble fractions of used light-weight




lignosulfonate type mud and hexavalent chromium on complete larval development




of the crabs, Rhithropanopeus harrisii and Callinectes sapidus.  EPA-600/3-82-




018.  National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.








Bookhout, C.G., et al.  1984.  Effects of hexavalent chromium on development of




crabs, Rhithropanopeous harrissii and Calinectes sapidus.  Water Air Soil




Pollut. 21:  199.








Boutet, C. and C. Chaisemartin.  1973.  Specific toxic properties of metallic




salts in Austropotamobius pallipes pallipes and Arconectes limosus.  C.R. Soc.




Biol. 167: 1933.









Bovee, E.G.   1976.  Effects of selected chemicals on movement, growth and




survival of  certain aquatic animal life.   PB 261388.  National Technical




Information  Service, Springfield, Virginia.
                                       71

-------
Bringmann, G.  1975.  Determination of Che biologically harmful efface of wacer




pollutancs by means of the retardation of cell proliferation of the blue algae




Microcystis.  Gesundheits-Ing. 96: 238.









Bringmann, G.  1978.  Determination of the biological toxicity of waterbound




substances towards protozoa. I. bacteriovorous flagellates (model organism:




Entosiphon sulcatum Stein).  Z. Wasser Abwasser Forsch. 11: 210.









Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn.  1959a.  The toxic effects of waste water on aquatic




bacteria, algae, and small crustaceans.  Gesundheits-Ing. 80: 115.








Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn.  1959b.  Water toxicology studies with protozoans as




test organisms.  Gesundheits-Ing. 80: 239.








Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn.  1976.  Comparative resulcs of the damaging effects




of water pollutants against bacteria (Pseudomonas putida) and blue algae




(Microcystis aeruginosa).  Gas-Wasserfach, Wasser-Abwasser 117: 410.








Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn.  1977a.  Limiting values for the damaging action of




water pollutants to bacteria (Pseudomonas putida) and green algae (Scenedesmus




quadricauda) in the cell multiplication inhibition test.  Z. Wasser Abwasser




Forsch. 10: 87.








Bringraann, G. and R. Kuhn.  1977b.  Results of the damaging effect of water




pollutants on Daphnia magna.  Z. Wasser Abwasser Forsch. 10: 161.
                                       72

-------
Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn.  1978a.  Limicing values for che noxious effaces of




water pollutant material to blue algae (Microcystis aeruginosa) and green algae




(Scenedesmus quadricauda) in cell propagation inhibition tests.  Vora Wasser 50:




45.








Bringraann, G. and R. Kuhn.  1978b.  Testing of substances for their toxicicy




threshold: model organisms Microcystis (Diplocystis) aeruginosa and Scenedesmus




quadricauda.  Mitt. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 21: 275.








Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn.  1979.  Comparison of toxic limiting concentrations




of water contamination toward bacteria, algae, and protozoa in the cell-growth




inhibition test.  Hauscech. Bauphys. Umwelttech. 100:  249.








Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn.  1980a.  Determination of che harmful biological




effect of water pollutants on protozoa. II. bacteriovorous ciliates.  Z. Wasser




Abwasser Forsch. 13: 26.








Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn.  1980b.  Comparison of che coxicity thresholds of




water pollutants to bacteria, algae, and protozoa in the cell multiplication




inhibition test.  Water Res. 14: 231.








Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn.  1981.  Comparison of the effects of harmful




substances on flagellates as well as ciliates and on halozoic bacteriophagous




and saprozoic protozoa.  Gas-Wasserfach, Wasser-Abwasser 122: 308.
                                       73

-------
Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn.  1982.  Resulcs of coxic action of wacer pollutants




on Daphnia magna Straus tested by an improved standardized procedure.  Z. Wasser




Abwasser Forsch. 15: 1.








Bringraann, G., et al.  1980.  Determination of biological damage from water




pollutants to protozoa. III. saprozoic flagellates.  Z. Wasser Abwasser Forsch.




13: 170.








Brkovic-Popovic, I. and M. Popovic.  1977a.  Effects of heavy metals on survival




and respiration rate of tubificid worms: Part I-effects on survival.  Environ.




Pollut. 13: 65.
               v
Brkovic-Popovic, I. and M. Popovic.  1977b.  Effects of heavy metals on survival




and respiration rate of tubificid .worms: Part II-effects on respiration rate.




Environ. Pollut. 13: 93.








Broderius, S.J. and L.L. Smith, Jr.  1979.  Lethal and sublethal effaces of




binary mixtures of cyanide and hexavalent chromium, zinc, or ammonia co the




fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) and rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) .  Jour.




Fish. Res. Board Can. 36: 164.









Buhler, D.R., et al.  1977.  Tissue accumulation and enzymatic effects of




hexavalent chromium in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri).  Jour. Fish Res. Board




Can. 34: 9.
                                       74

-------
Buikema, A.L., Jr., ec al.  1974a.  Rotifers as monitors of heavy mecal




pollution in water.  Bulletin 71.  Virginia Water Resources Research Center,




Blacksburg, Virginia.








Buikema, A.L., Jr., et al.  1974b.  Evaluation of Philodina acuticornis




(Rotifera) as a bioassay organism for heavy metals.  Water Resources Bull. 10:




648.








Buikema, A.L., Jr., et al.  1977.  Rotifer sensitivity to combinations of




inorganic water pollutants.  Bulletin 92.  Virginia Water Resources Research




Center, Blacksburg, Virginia.








Cairns, J., Jr., and J.J. Loos.  1967.  Changed feeding rate of Brachydanio




rerio (Hamilton-Buchanan) resulting from exposure co sublethal concentrations of




zinc, potassium dichromate, and alkyl benzene sulfonate detergent.  Proc.




Pennsylvania Acad. Sci. 40: 47.









Cairns, J., Jr., and A. Scheier.  1958.  The effects of periodic low oxygen upon




the toxicity of various chemicals to aquatic organisms.  Proc. 12th Ind. Waste




Conf., Purdue Univ., Eng. Ext. Ser. No. 94, Eng. Bull. 42: 165.








Cairns, J., Jr., and A. Scheier.  1959.  The relationship of bluegill sunfish




body size to tolerance for some common chemicals.  Proc. 13th Ind. Waste Conf.,




Purdue Univ., Eng. Ext. Ser. No. 95, Eng. Bull. 43: 243.
                                       75

-------
Cairns, J., Jr., and A. Scheier.  1968.  A comparison of the toxicicy of some




common industrial waste components tested individually and combined.  Prog.




Fish-Cult. 30: 3.








Cairns, J., Jr., et al.  1965.  A comparison of the sensitivicy to certain




chemicals of adult zebra danios Brachydanio rerio (Hamilton-Buchanan) and zebra




danio eggs with that of adult bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus Raf.  Notulae




Naturae, No. 381.









Cairns, J., Jr., et al.  1976.  Invertebrate response to thermal shock following




exposure to acutely sub-lethal concentrations of chemicals.  Arch. Hydrobiol.




77: 164.








Cairns, J., Jr., et al.  1978.  Effects of temperature on aquatic organism




sensitivity to selected chemicals.  Bulletin 106.  Virginia Water Resources




Research Center, Blacksburg, Virginia.








Cairns, J., Jr., et al.  1981.  Effects of fluctuating sublethal applications of




heavy metal solutions upon the gill ventilatory response of bluegills (Lepomis




aacrochirus).  EPA-600/3-81-003.  National Technical Information Service,




Springfield, Virginia.








Calabrese, A., et al.  1973.  The toxicity of heavy metals to embryos of the




American oyster Crassostrea virginica.  Mar. Biol. 18: 162.
                                       76

-------
Calamari, D., et al.  1982.  Toxicokinecics of low levels of Cd, Cr, Ni and




cheir mixture in long-term treatment on Salmo gairdneri Rich.  Chemosphere 11:




59.








Call, D.J., et al.  1981.  Aquatic pollutant hazard assessments and development




of a hazard prediction technology by quantitative structure-activicy




relationships.  Second Quarterly Report to EPA.  Center for Lake Superior




Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Superior, Superior, Wisconsin.








Call, D.J., et al.  1983.  Toxicity and metabolism studies with EPA priority




pollutants and related chemicals in freshwater organisms.  PB83-263665.




National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.








Callahan, M.A.,  et al.  1979.  Water-related environmental fate of 129 priority




pollutants.  Vol. I.  EPA-440/4-79-029a.  National Technical Information




Service, Springfield, Virginia.








Capuzzo, J.M. and J.J. Sasner.  1977.  The effect of chromium on filtration




rates and metabolic activity of Mytilus edulis L. and Mya arenaria L.  In; F.J.




Vernberg, et al. (eds.), Physiological Responses of Marine Biota to Pollutants.




Academic Press,  New York.  p. 225.









Cardin, J.A.  1982.  Memorandum to J.H. Gentile.  U.S. EPA, Narragansett, Rhode




Island.
                                       77

-------
Carr, R.S., ec al.  1982.  Bioavailability of chromium from a used




chromelignosulfonace drilling mud co five species of marine invertebrates.  Mar.




Environ. Res. 6:  189.








Chapman, G.A., et al.   Manuscript.  Effects of water hardness on the toxicity of




metals to Daphnia magna.  U.S. EPA, Corvallis, Oregon.









Chapman, W.H., et al.  1968.  Concentration factors of chemical elements in




edible aquatic organisms.  UCRL-50564.  National Technical Information Service,




Springfield, Virginia.









Christensen, G.M. and J.H. Tucker.  1976.  Effects of selected water toxicants




on the in vitro activity of fish carbonic anhydrase.  Chem.-Biol. Interactions




13: 181.








Clendenning, K.A. and W.J. North.  1959.  Effects of waste on the giant kelp,




Macrocystis pyrifera.   In; E.A. Pearson (ed.), Proc. 1st Conf. Waste Disposal




Marine Environ.  Berkeley, California,  p. 82.








Conklin, P.J., et al.   1983.  Comparative toxicity of drilling muds: role of




chromium and petroleum hydrocarbons.  Mar. Environ. Res. 10: 105.









Debelak, R.W.  1975.  Acute toxicity of mixtures of copper, chromium, and




cadmium to Daphnia magna.  Thesis.  Miami University, Oxford, Ohio.
                                       78

-------
Dixon, W.J. and M.B. Brown, eds.  1979.  BMDP Biomedical  Compucer Programs,




P-series.  University of California, Berkeley, California,  p. 521.








Dorfraan, D.  1977.  Tolerances of Fundulus heceroclicus to differenc mecals  in




sale waters.  Bull. New Jersey Acad. Sci. 22: 21.








Boughtie, D.G., et al.  1983.  Cucicular lesions induced  in grass shrimp exposed




to hexavalent chromium.  Jour. Invert. Pachol. 42: 249.








Dowden, B.F. and H.J. Bennett.  1965.  Toxicity of selected chemicals to certain




animals.  Jour. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 37: 1308.








Draggan, S.  1977.  Interactive effect of chromium compounds and a  fungal




parasite on carp eggs.  Bull. Environ. Contain. Toxicol. 17: 653.








Eisler, R.  1981.  Trace Metal Concentrations in Marine Organisms.  Pergamon




Press, New York.








Eisler, R. and R.J. Hennekey.  1977.  Acute toxicities of Cd2+, Cr>6, Hg"1"2,




Ni*2, and Zn+2 co estuarine macrofauna.  Arch. Environ. Concam. Toxicol. 6:  315.








Eisler, R., et al.  1979.  Fourth annotated bibliography on biological effects




of metals in aquatic environments.  EPA-600/3-79-084.  National Technical




Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.
                                       79

-------
Sllgaard, E.G., et al.  1978.  Locomocor accivicy of che bluegill Lepomis




macrochirus;  hyperactivicy induced by sublechal concentrations of cadmium,




chromium, and zinc.  Jour. Fish BioL. 1: 19.









Elwood, J.W., ec al.  1980.  Chromium levels in fish from a lake chronically




contaminated with chroraates from cooling cowers.  Inc. Jour. Environ. Studies




14: 289.









European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission.  1983.   Water quality criceria




for European freshwacer fish: report on chromium and freshwater fish.  Technical




Paper No. 43.  Rome, Italy.









Fales, 8..R.  1978.  The influence of temperature and salinity on the toxicity of




hexavalent chromium to che grass shrimp Palaemoneces pugio (Holthius).  Bull.




Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 20: 447.









Fasulo, M.P., et al.  1983.  Cytotoxic effaces of hexavalenc chromium in Euglena




gracilis. II. physiological and ultrastruccural studies.  Procoplasma 114: 35.









Flos, R. , et al.  1983.  Chromium and pocassium accumulation influenced by body




weight in goldfish (Carassius auratus).  Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 30:




331.









Frank, P.M. and P.B. Robertson.  1979.  The influence of salinity on coxicicy of




cadmium and chromium co che blue crab, Callinecces sapidus.  Bull. Environ.




Contam. Toxicol. 21: 74.




                                           80

-------
Freeman, B.J.  1978.  Accumulation of cadmium, chromium,  and  lead by bluegill




sunfish (Lepomis macrochirua Rafinesque) under temperature and oxygen stress.




SRO-757-6.  National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.








Freeman, B.J.  1980.  Accumulation of cadmium, chromium,  and  lead by bluegill




sunfish (Lepomis macrochirua Rafinesque) under temperature and oxygen stress.




Thesis.  University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.








Freeman, L. and I. Fowler.  1953.  Toxicity of combination of certain inorganic




compounds to Daphnia magna Straus.  Sew. Ind. Wastes 25:  1191.








Frey, B.E., ee-al.  1983.  Sensitivity of estuarine phytoplankton to hexavalent




chromium.   Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 17: 181.









Fromm, P.O. and R.H. Schiffman.  1958.  Toxic action of hexavalent chromium on




largemouth bass.   Jour. Wildl. Manage. 22: 40.









Fromm, P.O. and R.M. Stokea.  1962.  Assimilation and metabolism of chromium by




trouc.  Jour. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 34: 1151.








Carton, R.B.  1973.  Biological effects of cooling tower  blowdown.  In; G.F.




Bennett (ed.), Water - 1972.   AIChE Symposium Series Vol. 69.  American




Institute  of Chemical Engineers,  New York.  p. 284.









Gentile, J.H., et  al.  1982.   The use of life-tables for  evaluating the chronic




toxicity of pollutants to Myaidopais bahia.  Hydrobiologia 93: 179.



                                       81

-------
Gentile, S.M.  1982.  Memorandum to John H. Gentile.  U.S. EPA, Narragansett,




Rhode Island.








Giesy, J.P., Jr., and J.G. Wiener.  1977.  Frequency distribution of trace metal




concentrations in five freshwater fishes.  Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 106: 393.








Gordon, M.  1980.  Mytilus californianus as a bioindicator of trace metal




pollution: variability and statistical considerations.  Mar. Pollut. Bull. 11:




195.








Grande, M. and S. Andersen.  1983.  Lethal effects of hexavalent chromium, lead




and nickel on young stages of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in softwater.




Vatten 39: 405.








Hale, J.G.  1977.  Toxicity of metal mining wastes.  Bull. Environ. Contain.




Toxicol. 17: 66.








Hansen, D.J.  1983.  Memorandum to William A. Brungs.  U.S. EPA, Narragansett,




Rhode Island.








Hill, C.W. and P.O. Froram.  1968.  Response of the interrenal gland of rainbow




trout (Salmo gairdneri) to stress.  Gen. Corap. Endocrinol. 11: 69.









Hoffert, J.R. and P.O. Froram.  1964,  In vitro uptake of hexavalent chromium by




erythrocyte's, liver, and kidney tissue of the turtle, Chrysemys picta.  Physiol.




Zool. 37:  224.



                                       82

-------
Hogendoorn-Roozemond, A.S., ec al.  1978.  The influence of che pH on che




coxicicy of hexavalenC chromium co rainbow trout (Salmo gairdnerii).  Pergamon




Ser. Environ. Sci. 1: 477.








Holland, G.A., eC al.  1960.  Toxic effects of organic and inorganic pollucancs




on young salmon and crouc.  Research Bulletin No. 5.  Washington Department of




Fisheries,  p. 216.








Hughes, J.S.  1973.  Acute toxicity of thirty chemicals to striped bass (Morone




saxatilis).  Presented at the Western Association of State Game and Fish




Commissioners, Salt Lake City, Utah.  July.








Jan, T. and D.R. Young.  1978.  Chromium speciation in municipal wastewaters and




seawater.  Jour. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 50: 2327.








Klassen, C.W., et al.  1949.  The toxicity of hexavalent chromium to sunfish and




bluegills.  Proc. 4th Ind. Waste Conf., Purdue Univ., Ext. Ser. 68: 229.








Kuhnert, P.M., et al.  1976.  The effect of in vivo chromium exposure on Na/K-




and Mg-ATPase activity in several tissues of the rainbow trout (Salmo




gairdneri).  Bull. Environ. Concam. Toxicol. 15:  383.








Lee, D.R. and A.L. Buikeraa, Jr.  1979.  Molt-related sensitivity of Daphnia




pulex in toxicity testing.  Jour. Fish. Res. Board Can. 36: 1129.
                                       83

-------
Lee, H.H. and C.H. Xu.  1984.  Effects of metals on sea urchin development: a




rapid bioassay.  Mar. Polluc. Bull. 15: 18.








Lorz, H.W., ec al.  1978.  Effects of several metals on smolting of coho salmon.




EPA-600/3-78-090.  National Technical Information Service, Springfield,




Virginia.








Lucus, H.F., Jr., and D.N. Sdgington.  1970.  Concentrations of trace elements




in Great Lakes fishes.  Jour; Fish. Res. Board Can. 27: 677.









Lussier, S.H., et al.  Manuscript.  Acute and chronic effects of heavy metals




and cyanide on Mysidopsis bahia (Crustacea: Mysidacea).  U.S. EPA, Narragansett,




Rhode Island.








Marking, L.L.  1982.  Letter to Quentin Pickering.  National Fishery Research




Laboratory, Lacrosse, Wisconsin.  March 25.








Martin, M.  1984.  Relationship between physiological stress and trace toxic




substances in the bay mussel, Mytilus edulis, from San Francisco Bay,




California.  Mar. Environ. Res. 11: 91.








Martin, M., et al.  1981.  Toxicicies of ten metals to Crassostrea gigas and




Mytilus edulis embryos and Cancer magister  larvae.  Mar. Pollut. Bull. 12:  305.








Mathis, B.J. and T.F. Cumraings.  1973.  Selected metals in sediments, water, and




biota in the Illinois River.  Jour. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 45: 1573.



                                       84

-------
Mearns, A.J. and D.R. Young.   1977.   Chromium  in  the  southern  California  marine

environment.  In; C.S. Giam  (ed.), Pollutant Effects  on  Marine Organisms.   D.C.

Heath and Co., Lexington, Massachusetts,  p. 125.

         .*•.*"
Mearns, A.J., et al.  1976.  Chromium effects  on  coastal organisms.   Jour.  Water

Pollut. Control Fed.  48: 1929.


Moraitou-Apostolopoulou, M.  and G. Verriopoulos.   1982a.   Individual  and

combined toxicity of three heavy metals, Cu, Cd and Cr,  for  the marine  copepod

Tisbe holothuriae.  Hydrobiologia 87: 83.


Moraitou-Apostolopoulou, M.  and G. Verriopoulos.   1982b.   Toxicity of chromium  to

the marine planktonic copepod Acartia clausi,  Giesbrecht.  Hydrobiologia  96:  121.


Moshe, M., et al.  1972.  Effect of industrial wastes on  oxidation pond

performance.  Water Res. 6:  1165.


Mount, D.I.  1982.  Memorandum co Charles E. Stephan.  U.S.  EPA,  Duluch,

Minnesota.  June 7.


Mount, D.I. and T.J. Norberg.  1984.  A seven-day  life-cycle cladoceran toxicity

test.  Environ.  Toxicol. Chem. 3: 425.


Muller, H.G.  1980.  Acute toxicity of potassium dichromate  to Daphnia magna  as

a function of the water quality.  Bull. Environ. Contam.  Toxicol. 25: 113.
                                       85

-------
Muller, H.G.  1982.  The influence of che water composition and the food quality




on ecotoxicological tests with Daphnia magna.  In; Environment and Quality of




Life: Principles for the Interpretation of the Results of Testing Procedures in




Ecotoxicology.  EUR 7549.  Commission of the European Communities, Brussels,




Belgium.








Muramoto, S.  1981.  Influence of complexans (NTA, EDTA) on the toxicity of




trivalent chromium (chromium chloride, sulfate) at levels lethal to fish.  Jour.




Environ. Sci. Health 16A: 605.









National Research Council of Canada.  1976.  Effects of chromium in the Canadian




environment.  NRCC No. 15017.  Ottawa, Canada.








Neter, J. and W. Wasserman.  1974.  Applied Linear Statistical Models.  Irwin,




Inc., Horaewood, Illinois.








Okubo, K. and T. Okubo.  1962.  Study on the bioassay method for the evaluation




of water pollution. II. use of the fertilized eggs of sea urchins and bivalves.




Bull. Tokai. Reg. Fish. Res. Lab. 32: 131.








Olson, K.R. and R.C. Barrel.  1973.  Effect of salinity on acute toxicity of




mercury, copper, and chromium for Rangia cuneata (Pelecypoda, Mactridae).




Contrib. Mar. Sci. 17: 9.








Olson, P.A.  1958.  Comparative toxicity of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) in salmon.  In;




Hanford Biological Research Annual Report for 1957.  HW-53500.  p. 215.




                                       86

-------
Olson, P.A. and R.F. Foster.  1956.  Effect of chronic exposure co sodium




dichroraate on young chinook salmon and rainbow trout.  In: Hanford Biological




Research Annual Report for 1955.  HW-41500.  p. 35.









Olson, P.A. and R.F. Foster.  1957.  Further studies on the effect of sodium




dichromate on juvenile chinook salmon.  In: Hanford Biological Research Annual




Report for 1956.  HW-47500.  National Technical Information Service,




Springfield, Virginia.








O'Neill, J.G.  1981.  The humoral immune response of Salmo trutta L. and




Cyprinus carpio L. exposed to heavy metals.  Jour. Fish. Biol. 19: 297.








Oshida, P.S. and D.J. Reish.  1975.  Effects of chromium on reproduction in




polychaetes.  1974 Annual Report.  S. California Coastal Water Res. Proj., SI




Segundo, California,  p. 55.








Oshida, P.S. and L.S. Word.  1982.  Bioaccumulation of chromium and its effects




on reproduction in Neanthes arenaceodentata (Polychaeta).  Mar. Environ. Res. 7:




167.









Oshida, P.S. and J.L. Wright.  1978.  Effects of hexavalent chromium on sea




urchin embryos and brittle stars.  1977 Annual Report.  S. California Coastal




Water Res.  Proj., El Segundo, California,  p. 181.
                                       87

-------
Oshida, P.S., et al.  1976.  The effects of hexavalenc and crivalenc chromium on




Neanches arenaceodencaca (Polychaeca: Annelida).  S. California Coascal Wacer




Res. Proj., El Segundo, California.  TM225: 58.








Oshida, P.S., ec al.  1981.  Effects of hexavalenc and trivlenc chromium on che




reproduction of Neanthes arenaceodencata (Polychaece).  Mar. Environ. Res. 5:




41.








Pagano, G., ec al.  1983.  The effects of hexavalenc and crivalenc chromium on




fercilizacion and development in sea urchins.  Environ. Res. 30: 442.









Pardue, W.J. and T.S. Wood.  1980.  Baseline toxicity daca for freshwater




bryozoa exposed to copper, cadmium, chromium, and zinc.  Jour. Tennessee Acad.




Sci. 55: 27.








Parker, J.G.  1984.  The effects of selected chemicals and water quality on the




marine polychaete Ophyothrocha diadema.  Wacer Res. 18: 865.








Patrick, R., ec al.  1968.  The relative sensitivity of diatoms, snails, and




fish to twenty common constituents of industrial wastes.  Prog. Fish-Cult. 30:




137.








Patrick, R., ec al.  1975.  The role of trace elements in management of nuisance




growth.  EPA-660/2-75-008.  National Technical Information Service, Springfield,




Virginia.
                                       83

-------
Pearce, R.M., et al.  1971.  Mineral analysis of selected aquatic invertebrates

collected from French Creek near Meadsville, Pa.  Pennsylvania Acad. Sci. 45:

188.


Phillips, G.R. and R.C. Russo.  1978.  Metal bioaccumulation in fishes and

aquatic invertebrates: a literature review.  EPA-600/3-78-103.  National

Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.


Pickering, Q.H.  1980.  Chronic toxicity of hexavalent chromium to the fathead

minnow (Pimephales promelas).  Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 9: 405.


Pickering, Q.H.  Manuscript.  Chronic toxicity of trivalent chromium to the

fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) in hard water.  U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio.

                         i
Pickering, Q.H. and C. Henderson.  1966.  The acute toxicity of some heavy

metals to different species of warmwater fishes.  Air Water Pollut. Int. Jour.

10: 453.


Rarausino, M.C., et al.  1981.  Influence of chromium (VI) upon stream

Ephemeroptera in the Pre-Alps.  Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 26: 228.


Ravera, 0.  1977.  Effects  of heavy metals (cadmium, copper, chromium and lead)

on a freshwater snail: Biomphalaria glabrata Say (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia).

Malacologia 16: 231.
                                       89

-------
Raymont, J.E.G. and J. Shields.  1963.  Toxicity of copper and chromium in che




marine environment.  Air Water Pollut. Int. Jour. 7: 435.








Rehwoldt, R., et al.  1972.  The effect of increased temperature upon the acute  .




toxicity of some heavy metal ions.  Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 8: 91.








Rehwoldt, R., et al.  1973.  The acute toxicity of some heavy metal ions toward




benthic organisms.  Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicoi. 10: 291.








Reish, D.J.  1977.  Effects of chromium on the life history of Capitella




caoitata (Annelida: Polychaeta).  In; F.J. Vernberg, et al. (eds.),




Physiological Responses of Marine Biota to Pollutants.  Academic Press, New




York.  p. 199.








Reish, D.J. and R.S. Carr.  1978.  The effect of heavy metals on the survival,




reproduction, development and life cycles for two species of polychaetous




annelids.  Mar. Pollut. Bull. 9: 24.  (Table 3 available  from author).








Reish, D.J., et al.  1976.  The effect of heavy metals on laboratory populations




of two polychaetes with comparisons to the water quality  conditions and




standards in southern California marine waters.  Water Res. 10: 299.









Richter, J.R.  1982.  Memorandum to Charles E. Stephan.  U.S. EPA, Duluth,




Minnesota.  June 30.
                                       90

-------
Riva, M.C., et al.  1981.  Lethal potassium dichromate and whitening




(blankophor) exposure of goldfish (Carassius auratus): chromium level in gills.




Corap. Biochem. Physiol. 68C: 161.









Ruesink, R.G. and L.L. Smith, Jr.  1975.  The relationship of the 96-hour LC50




to the lethal threshold concentration of hexavalent < ' romiura, phenol and sodium




pentachlorophenate for fathead minnows  (Pimephalea promelas Rafinesque).  Trans.




Am. Fish. Soc. 104: 567.









Ruthven, J.A. and J. Cairns, Jr.  1973.  Response of fresh-water protozoan




artificial communities to metals.  Jour. Protozool. 20:  127.









Sauter, S., et al.  1976.  Effects of exposure to heavy metals on selected




freshwater fish.  Toxicity of copper, cadmium, chromium and lead to eggs and  fry




of seven fish species.  EPA-600/3-76-105.  National Technical Information




Service, Springfield, Virginia.









Schaefer, E.D. and W.O. Pipes.   1973.   Temperature and the toxicity of




chrotnate and arsenate to the rotifer, Philodina roseola.  Water Res.




7: 1781.









Schiffman, R.H. and P.O. Froimn.  1959.  Chromium induced changes in the




blood of rainbow trout, Salmo gairdnerii.  Sew. Ind. Wastes 31: 205.









Sherwood, M.J.  1975.  Toxicity  of chromium to fish.  1974 Annual Report.  S.




California Coastal Water Res. Proj., El Segundo, California.  p. 61.




                                        91

-------
Shuster, C.N. , Jr., and B.J. Pringle.  1969.  Trace metal accumulation by the
American oyster, Crassostrea virginica.  1968 Proc. Nacl. Shellfish Assoc. 59:
91.
                                                                                  *
                                                                                •
Sklar, F.H.  1980.  A preliminary comparison of Che upcake of chromium-51 and
zinc-65 by chree species of aquacic planes from Louisiana.  Louisiana Acad. Sci.
43: 46.


Smillie, R.H., ec al.  1981.  Reduction of chrotnium(VI) by baccerially produced
hydrogen sulfide in a marine environment.  Water Res. 15: 1351.


Smissaert, H.R., et al.  1975.  Pitfalls in experiments of a possible effect of
chromium III, with special reference to the acetylcholinesterase of the gill of
the rainbow Crout.  In: J.H. Koeman and J.J.T.W.A. Strik (eds.), Sublethal
Effects of Toxic Chemicals on Aquatic Animals.  Elsevier, New York.  p. 93.


Smith, M.J. and A.G. Heath.  1979.  Acute coxicity of copper, chromate, zinc,
and cyanide co freshwater fish: effect of different temperatures.  Bull.
Environ. Contara. Toxicol. 22: 113.
                                                                                  4
Smock, L.A.  1983.  Relationship between metal concentrations and organism size   ,
in aquatic insects.  Freshwater Biol. 13: 313.


Srivastava, A.K., et al.  1979.  Effects of chromium on the blood of a
freshwater teleost.  Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 3: 321.
                                       92

-------
Scanley, R.A.  1974.  Toxicity of heavy metals and salts to Eurasian water-




milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.).  Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2:  331.








Stary, J. and K. Kratzer.  1982.  The cumulation of toxic metals on alga.  Int.




Jour. Environ. Anal. Chera. 12: 65.








Stary, J., et al.  1982.  The accumulation of chromium  and arsenic species in




fish (Poecilia reticulata).  Int. Jour. Environ. Anal.  Chem.  12: 253.








Staub, R.J., et al.  1973.  Effects of industrial effluents on primary




phytoplankton indicators.  PB 220741.  National Technical Information Service,




Springfield, Virginia.








Stephan, C.E., et al.  1985.  Guidelines  for deriving numerical national water




quality criteria for the protection of aquatic organisms and  their uses.




National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.








Stephenson, R.R. and S.A. Watts.  1984.   Chronic toxicity tests with Daphnia




magna; the effects of different food and  temperature regimes  on survival,




reproduction and growth.  Environ. Pollut. (Series A) 36: 95.








Stevens, D.G. and G.A. Chapman.   1984.  Toxicity of trivalent chromium  to early




life stages of steelhead trout.  Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 3: 125.








Strik, J.J.T.W.A., et al.  1975.  Toxicity of chromium  (VI) in fish, with




special reference to organoweights, liver and plasma enzyme activities, blood



                                       93

-------
parameters and histological alterations.  In: J.H. Koeman and J.J.T.W.A. Strik


(eds.), Sublethal Effects of Toxic Chemicals on Aquatic Animals.  Elsevier, New


York.  p. 31.





Sudo, R. and S. Aiba.  1973.  Effect of copper and hexavalent chromium on the


specific growth rate of ciliata isolated from activated-sludge.  Water Res. 7:


1301.





Sugatt, R.H.  1980a.  Effect of sublethal sodium dichromate exposure in


freshwater on the salinity tolerance and serum osmolarity of juvenile coho


salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch, in seawater.  Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.


9: 41.





Sugatt, R.H.  1980b.  Effects of sodium dichromate{exposure on the immune


responses of juvenile coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch, against Vibrio


anguillarum.  Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 9:  207.





Tacon, A.G.J. and M.M. Beveridge.  1982.  Effects of dietary trivalent chromium


on rainbow trout.  Nutrition Rept. Int. 25:  49.





Temraink, J.H.M., et al.  1983.  An ultrastructural study of chromate-induced


hyperplasia in the gill of rainbow crout (Salmo gairdneri).  Aquat. Toxicol. 4:


165.





Ten Holder, V.J.H.M., et al.  1973.  The uptake,  tissue distribution and


retention of hexavalent chromium by young rainbow trout (Salmo gairdnerii).  In;
             ~~"~                     »

                                       94

-------
0. Huczinger, ec al. (eds.), Aquacic Pollutants: Transformation and Biological




Effects.  Pergatnon Press, Oxford, England,  p. 475.








Thompson, S.E., et al.  1972.  Concentration factors of chemical elements in




edible aquatic organisms.  UCRL-50564.  Rev. 1.  National Technical Information




Service, Springfield, Virginia.








Tong, S.S.C., et al.  1974.  Trace elements in Lake Cayuga  lake trout




(Salvelinus namaycush) in relation to age.  Jour. Fish. Res. Board Can. 31:




238.








Trabalka, J.R. and C.W. Gehrs.  1977.  An observation on the toxicity of




hexavalent chromium to Daphnia magna.  Toxicol. Letters 1:  131.








Trama, F.B. and R.J. Benoit.  1960.  Toxicity of hexavalent chromium co




bluegills.  Jour. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 32: 868.








Turnbull, H., et al.  1954.  Toxicity of various refinery materials to fresh




water fish.  Ind. Eng. Chem. 46:  324.








U.S. EPA.  1976.   Quality criteria for water.   EPA-440/9-76-023.  National




Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.









U.S. EPA.  1980.   Ambient water quality criteria for chromium.  EPA-440/5-80-




035.  National Technical Information Service,  Springfield, Virginia.
                                       95

-------
U.S. EPA.  1983a.  Methods for chemical analysis of wacer and wasces.




EPA-600/4-79-020 (Revised March 1983).  National Technical Information Service,




Springfield, Virginia.









U.S. EPA.  1983b.  Water quality standards regulation.  Federal Register 48:




51400.  November 8.








U.S. EPA.  1983c.  Water quality standards handbook.  Office of Water




Regulations and Standards, Washington, O.C.









U.S. EPA.  1985.. Technical support document for water quality-based toxics




control.  Office of Water, Washington, D.C.









van der Putte, I. and P. Part.  1982.  Oxygen and chromium transfer in perfused




gills of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) exposed to hexavalent chromium at two




different pH levels.  Aquat. Toxicol. 2: 31.








van der Putte, I., et al.  1981.  Effect of pH on uptake, tissue distribution




and retention of hexavalent chromium in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri).  Aquat.




Toxicol. 1: 3.








van der Putte, I., et al.  1982.  Effects of hexavalenc chromium in rainbow




trout (Salmo gairdneri) after prolonged exposure at two different pH levels.




Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 6: 246.
                                       96

-------
van Weerecc, M., ec al.   1984.  Upcake and release of 51Cr(VI)  and 51Cr(lII)




by barnacles (Balarms sp.).  Mar. Environ. Res.  11: 201.









Verriopoulos, G.  1980.   La toxicite du Cr copepode harpacciocoide Tisbe




holochuriae ea  relacion avec la temperature.  Jour. Etud. Polluc. Mar. Mediterr.




5: 797.









Viale, G. and D. Calamari.  1984.  Immune response in rainbow crout Salmo




gairdneri after long term treatment with low levels of Cr, Cd and Cu.  Environ.




Pollut. (Series A) 35: 247.









Waheda, M.F.  1977.  Effect of size of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and




green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus) on hexavalent  chromium toxicity.  Thesis.




Wright State University,  Dayton, Ohio.









Wallen, I.E., et al.  1957.  Toxicity to Gambusia affinis of certain pure




chemicals in turbid waters.  Sew. Ind. Wastes 29: 695.









Warnick, S.L. and H.L. Bell.  1969.  The acute toxicicy of some heavy raecals




to different species of aquatic insects.  Jour. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 41:




280.









Watling, H.R.  1981a.   Effects of metals on development of oyster embryos.




South African Jour.  Sci.  77: 134.
                                       97

-------
Watling, H.R.  1981b.  Accumulation of seven metals by Crassostrea gigas,




Crassostrea margaritacea, Peina perna and Choromytilus meridionalis.  Bull.




Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 30: 317.




                                                                                 i



Weber, W.J. , Jr., and W. Stutam.   1963.  Mechanism of hydrogen  ion buffering  in   "*




natural waters.  Jour. Am. Water Works Assoc. 55: 1553.








White, A.M.  Manuscript.  The toxicity of hexavalent chromium  (Cr"1"^)  to




twenty-one species of aquatic animals native to Ohio.  John Carroll University,




University Heights, Ohio.








White, B.  1979.  Report of two toxicity evaluations conducted using  hexavalent




chromium.  Michigan Department of Natural Resources.








Wiura-Anderson, S.  1974.  The effect of chromium on the photosynthesis and




growth of diatoms and green algae.  Physiol. Plant. 32: 308.








Wong, M.H., et al.  1982a.  Toxic effects of chromic sulphate  on the  common




carp, Cyprinus carpio.  Toxicol. Letters 10: 225.



                                                                                   i




Wong, P.T.S., et al.  1982b.  Physiological and biochemical responses of  several   '
                                                                                   *



freshwater algae to a mixture of metals.  Chemosphere 11: 367.








Yongue, W.H., Jr., et al.  1979.  Survival of Euglena gracilis exposed co




sublethal temperature and hexavalent chromium.  Jour. Protozool. 26:  122.
                                       98

-------
Zarafonetis, J.H. and R.E. Hampton.  1974.  Some effects of small concentrations




of chromium on growth and phytosynthesis in algae.  Michigan Acad. 6: 417.








Zaroogian, G.E. and M. Johnson.  1983.  Chromium uptake and loss in the bivalves




Crassostrea virginicia and Mytilus edulis.  Mar. Ecol. Progress Series 12: 167.
                                       99

-------