-------
Pulp Manufacturers Data Summary
Table B
Data pulled on Jury 13, 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
:ii?
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
1«5
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
15?
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
JAME
Mississippi RivERittdRpT '
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.
NTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
STONE CONTAINER CORP
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
LAUREL HILL PAPER CO
THE CELOTEX CORP.
ALPHA CELLULOSE CORP.
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
REXHAM INC.
P.H. GIATFELTB? CO:
WEYERHAUSER
FEDERAL PAPER BOARD CO.. INC.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
CROWN PAPER CO.
MARCAL PAPER MILLS
GARDEN STATE PAPER CO
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CCL
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP
FINCH. PRUYN A CO .; 1NC.
LYOALL MANNING
STEVENS it THOMPSON PAPER CO.,
LYONS FALLS PULP & PAPER INC.
PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA
ENCORE PAPER CO.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
MEAD CORP
OHtO PULP MILLS INC
JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION
STONE CONTAINER CORP,
ATLAS ROOFING CORP.
CHENEY PULP 1 PAPER CO
BAY WEST PAPER CORP.
CERTAINTEED CORP.
APPLETON PAPERS INC.
FRASISR PAPERS INC,, W CARRQU
FORT HOWARD CORPORATION
ORCHIDS PAPER PRODUCTS CO
WEYERHAEUSER
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC.
JAMES RIVER CORP
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
JAMES RIVER CORP
SMURFIT NEWSPRINT CORP
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
SMURFIT NEWSPRINT CORP.
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
GEORGiA-PACIFiC CORP
SIMPSON PAPER CO.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
PROCTER J, GAMBLE PAPER PRODUCT
APPLETON PAPERS INC.
P.H. GLATFELTER CO.
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC!:
BOWATER INC.
Inspections (2 years)
Air
Total
- 3.1
NP
NP
1
3
0
1
1
3
5
2
2
14
4
0
3
1
2
1
1
1
7
1
0
2
2
1
5
8
NP
2
8
1
NP
NP
2
5
2
3
NP
4
4
1
7
1
2
2
1
0
4
1
4
7
0
3
6
8
2
2
Water
Total
Avaraga
SMNOtt 1
27
2
0
6
3
S
4
1
4
1
0
3
1
3
2
2
1
2
0
4
5
4
NP
5
9
NP
4
5
4
NP
6
0
NP
0
2
NP
2
2
2
NP
2
2
2
3
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
1
5
18
3
4
10
3
4
RCRA
TOW
Avaraga
Saa Nota 1
'• 0.5
NP
0
0
1
1
NP
NP
0
0
2
1
1
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
NP
1
0
0
NP
1
0
0
NP
1
0
1
0
0
NP
0
0
1
1
0
»
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
NP
2
1
0
Total
Avaraga
Saa Nota 1
54
2
0
7
7
6
5
3
7
6
4
B
16
?
3
S
4
4
1
6
7
11
1
9
11
2
6
10
12
NP
9
8
1
8
3
2
8
4
5
NP
E
6
4
11
4
4
5
3
2
6
3
5
12
18
3
10
20
6
6
Historical Noncomplance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompliBnce
event)
Air
Avaraga
SaaNola 1
1.0
D
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
4
0
0
0
6
0
0
6
a
0
3
1
NP
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
NP
0
0
8
G
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
1
3
0
0
0
2
a
3
water
Avaraga
Saa Nota 1
1 f6
3
0
0
1
0
5
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
8
8
0
3
8
8
0
5
4
0
B
8
0
NP
2
2
0
6
7
0
0
9
1
NP
1
ft
2
2
3
0
4
0
2
2
0
0
4
2
0
2
0
t
3
RCRA
Avaraga
Saa Not* 1
0.6
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
&
0
0
0
NP
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
NP
0
0
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
&
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
A. W R
Avaraga
Saa Nota:
Ts
3
0
0
8
0
5
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
5
8
8
0
3
8
8
0
5
6
0
8
8
1
NP
2
3
0
0
7
2
3
0
1
NP
t
0
8
4
3
0
4
:0
2
r
0
i
5
2
0
2
2
6
5
Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Ad (2
year data)
• of
poMarts
ovar hmt
Avaraga
SaaNote 1
2.0
3
1
t
2
1
2
0
3
t
0
0
1
t
0
3
1
0
0
3
1
7
NP
4
5
NP
0
2
2
NP
2
3
NP
0
2
NP
1
»
2
NP
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
1
2
0
D
2
1
1
2
4
2
7
f olpoftjtants
raguutad
«•"*•
Saa Nota 1
575
6
17
10
16
18
15
0
14
17
0
13
14
1+
20
20
5
7
0
18
15
18
NP
13
9
NP
24
22
20
NP
20
2.1
NP
6
26
NP
15
1$
9
NP
10
«
16
»
12
1S
28
7
12
26
6
0
11
13
7
29
11
IS
18
• of raports
over fcnut
Avaraoa
Saa Nota 1
6.0
9
1
1
2
1
23
0
11
i
0
0
1
6
0
1J
1
0
0
16
1
11
NP
7
26
MP
0
4
2
NP
7
6
NP
ft
4
NP
1
2
2
NP
0
0
2
0
2
1
0
0
1
i
0
0
4
1
11
J
6
6
15
• of raports
sutxnttad
tarw
Saa Nota 1
3824
123
191
295
1,164
37S
345
0
315
390
0
293
453
3*8
399
1.041
48
322
0
418
356
411
NP
357
246
NP
324
550
844
NP
596
745
NP
0
491
NP
409
449
304
NP
202
494
872
271
215
378
307
397
925
405
223
0
288
271
204
415
372
430
566
Significant Noncompliance Indicator
Air
Parcart of
FaciWas
I 19.4%
NP
NP
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
hi
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
NP
N
Y
N
NP
NP
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Wotar
Parcart of
FaciMas
Saa Nota 1
7.7%
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
NP
N
N
N
NP
Y
N
NP
N
N
NP
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
RCRA
Parcant of
Facittaas
' ao5T
NP
N
N
N
N
NP
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
W
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
A+W*R
Avarw.
Saa Nota 3
0.3
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
«
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
<)
0
0
0
«
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years
Air
Awaga
63
NP
NP
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
Z
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
NP
0
0
0
NP:
NP
0
1
0
0
NP
1
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
3
ft
0
Watar
Avaraga
0.2
1
0
0
0
&
0
9
0
ft
0
ft
0
9
0
0
0
ft
0
ft
0
1
NP
0
1
NP
0
0
0
NP
0
0
NP
0
0
NP
0
0
0
NP
0
ft
0
0
1
0
0
a
o
o
0
i>
o
0
0
0
o
ft
1
RCRA
Avaraga
Saa Nota 1
0.0
NP
0
0
0
0
NP
NP
0
a
a
D
0
0
0
2
1
a
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
NP
0
a
0
NP
0
a
0
NP
0
a
0
0
a
NP
0
0
0
g
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
a
o
0
o
NP
0
0
0
Total
Avaraga
Saa Nota 1
0.5
T
0
a
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
2
6
2
0
a
0
3
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
NP
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
NP
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
D
0
^
o
0
0
i
3
0
1
Note 1: Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2. Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomptlance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3 Average number of programs in which faciities are considered to be in significant noncompriance. (maximum value=3)
Note 4 This indicator is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector: Automobile Assembly: vehiclesAwar; Pulp Mils: short tons/day: Petroleum Refining: babels/day; Iron and Steel Mills: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5 This indicator l! NOT comparable across industry sectors. Average is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 6. Average of those with it least one spil reported.
Note 7 Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID* identified: NC = value not calculated: Inact«inactive permit/ID»
50
-------
Pulp Manufacturers Data Summary
Table C
Data puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
11?
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
15?
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
155
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
NAME
MISSISSIPPI RIVER CORP.
GEORGIA'PACIFIC CORP
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP:
LAUREL HILL PAPER CO
THE CELOTEX CORP.
ALPHA CELLULOSE CORP
WEYEftHAEUSER CO:
REXHAM INC
P.M. GtATFELTER CO.
WEYERHAUSER
FEDERAL PAPER BOARD CO .INC.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
CROWN PAPER CO.
MARCAL PAPER MILLS
GARDEN STATE PAPER CO:
KIMBERLY'CLARK CORP
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
FINCH, PRUYN * CO., INC.
LYOALL MANNING
STEVENS tV THOMPSON PAPER CO.,
LYONS FALLS PULP 4 PAPER INC
PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA
ENCORE PAPER CO.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
MEAD CORP.
OHIO PULP MILLS INC
JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION
STONE CONTAINER CORP,
ATLAS ROOFING CORP
CHENEY PULP *. PAPER CO
BAY WEST PAPER CORP
CERTAINTEEDCORP;
APPLETON PAPERS INC.
FRASKR PAPERS INC .WCARROU
FORT HOWARD CORPORATION
ORCHIDS PAPER PRODUCTS CO.
WEYERHAEUSER
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC.
JAMES RIVER CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
JAMES RIVER CORP
SMURFIT NEWSPRINT CORP:
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
SMURFIT NEWSPRINT CORP.
WEYERHAEUSER CO
GEORGIA'PACIFie CORP.
SIMPSON PAPER CO.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO-
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
PROCTER & GAMBLE PAPER PRODUCT
APPLETON PAPERS INC,
P H GLATFELTER CO
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC
BOWATER INC.
Production
Short Tons/Day
Average
See Notes 14 4
1,016
350
1.550
1.600
1,910
1,613
50
520
165
MO
300
2.460
2,400
1.440
71S
250
BOO
132
550
646
620
20
55
220
200
850
1,300
SO
325
845
130
30
260
90
350
300
849
75
3.200
1.350
1,200
950
265
1,080
600
650
1,900
I.SMl
525
1.019
1.000
650
210
815
TOO
225
TRI Releases
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
1,009,463
NP
1.067.431
1.51S.795
1.965.900
2,999,426
NP
500
4,581
1.224,315
8.600
431.167
2.431.560
J.J22,WO
620.694
580.479
Inact
a
15.573
a
63.515
2,489,444
a
Inact
5
NP
255
J95.555
1.316,290
NP
604.975
1,577,485
Inact
250
Inact
NP
423,300
12,830
754.498
NP
3.198.148
S6S,«07
445.318
1.084,221
705.676
79,458
23.005
8S.164
2.592.060
1.206.120
Inact
2.426,248
712,384
748,988
710.670
225.507
1,611.944
609,639
1.635,586
TRI Transfers
1996 -Total Pounds
Average
See Motel
201,719
NP
31,057
0
511
2,867
NP
3,820
0
0
2.000
200.627
0
0
0
4.638
Inact
0
237,485
0
0
1905
10.988
Inact
0
NP
0
0
164.003
NP
505
0
Inact
250
Inact
NP
90,700
0
3.100
NP
0
0
0
0
2.260
207,546
0
124,309
7.698
0
Inact
3.737.52*;
0
0
0
609
14,326
0
0
TRI Releases
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ production units
Average
See Notes 14 5
1178.0
NC
708.7
949,3
1.029.5
1,861.3
NC
8.3
27.8
1.530.4
NC
2.106.0
988.4
1,384.3
569.9
790.4
NC
0.0
1.917.1
0,0
98.3
3,9893
549.4
NC
0.0
NC
1.3
347,7
1,138.7
NC
1.863.0
1,8*6.9
NC
16.7
NC
NC
1.468.6
426
8923
NC
9994
432.5
371.1
1.120.2
2.671.5
2657
38.3
3192
1,3683
8122
NC
6.048,8
7124
1.1S23
NC
1,076.7
1.995.4
870.9
72693
TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
94,718
HP
0
84.240
173.820
190,860
NP
0
0
147,975
0
0
138.513
639,200
66.546
15,520
Inact
0
13.578
0
0
0
0
tract
0
NP
0
22.600
98.070
NP
146.880
510; 1»
Inact
0
Inact
NP
37.000
fl
41,250
NP
141.529
31,654
7,190
31.242
280,200
0
0
0
427,500
78,690
Inact
130.194
16.612
0
0
82,100
51.104
235,161
229.835
TRI Releases <•
Transfers -
Metals
1996 -Total Pounds
Average
SeeNotel
39.143
NP
0
0
0
0
NP
4,320
0
6
0
198.391
3.518
0
0
:0
Inact
0
0
0
0
0
3.665
Inact
0
NP
0
9,900
30.030
NP
0
0
Inact
0
Inact
NP
18.000
0
33,350
NP
0
0
0
0
0
2*1.661
0
0
0
ft
Inact
3367;
0
0
0
4s!s57
7.848
432,630
TRI Production -
Related Waste
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
7.129,139
NP
17.345,072
20.555,472
8.584.832
18,648,568
NP
280
4,581
22,344,112
39,600
2.333.64B
22.364.368
2J.041.328
7,188,200
6,835.024
Inact
0
243,826
0
599.606
5,427,200
11.467
ln»ct
0
NP
300
6.665,008
8,321.508
NP
787,034
1,834.t92
Inact
23,800
Inact
NP
1.629,000
348,04?
941,460
NP
10.681.656
3.216,442
30.234,752
1:869,050
5,768.248
41,000
206,977
8,114.512
2,522.400
Inact
10.2SZ512
4,600,780
1.722,959
2,891.192
1,580.400
6.347,704
6,371,376
Pollutant SpMs (last 2 years)
Soil Occurrence
Percent ot
Facihbes
37.7%
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
¥
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
M.
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
* ot Spils
Average
SeeNotee
36
3
7
1
4
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
2
5
3
2
1
Amount Spiled {tjs)
Average
See Note 7
1 1 .879
24
20,625
4,000
6r
10.560
15.340
375
37Z
1
490
70.564
42
1,357
1,066
385
Surrounding
Population
Residents wthn 3
mtos
Average
SeeNotel
24,957
^0,364
703
411
1.398
•tO.781
3,360
8,792
18.234
t,012
33.096
4.OT7
2.371
628
16.100
9,659
286.532
288,927
65.968
2.760
3,329
36^17
94.597
3,444
1,922
1,922
35.821
23,352
23,352
13.669
tt.SSS
24,324
23,330
45.986
3.481
53,015
40,622
l!si5
7,574
734
1.777
680
7 130
35614
3.491
41 550
59323
4,730
15,160
2.539
4,942
8,728
1,089
Note 1 Average is calculated across «l entries witri value o» 0 of greater.
Note 2 Average of number of Quarters with a violation or noncomplance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs in which facilities are considered to be in significant noncomplance, (maximum value=3)
Not. 5- ™! 'r^'!"' I* WOT TT"^ '"""inlU*" S"*°™ I"* "*" "*"" °^'" * "*'* MmM>* Assembly: veNdes/year; Pulp Mills short tons/day: Petroleum Refining: battels/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short tons/year Nonferrous Metals metric tons/year
Note 6 Avera™ol'"os
-------
Pulp Manufacturers Location Data
Table A
Dtli puled on July 13.1998 from Integrated Data foe Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
17S
176
177
178
17S
180
181
182
1W
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
M7
208
209
210
21<
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
229
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
NAME
wesTyAco:CORP,:::;:;::;:::::::;:::::::::::::
UNION CAMP CORP
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
SONOCO PRODUCTS CO.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
BOWATER INC.;
SOUTHERN CELLULOSE PRODUCTS IN
PACKAGING CORP, OP AMERICA
MEAD CORP.
TAMKO ROOFING PRODUCTS, INC:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORP:
PONDEROSAOF TENNESSEE
INLAND CONTAINER CORP.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP
CHAMPION WTERNATWNAt CORP
INLAND PAPERBOARD AND PACKAGIN
SIMPSON PASADENA PAPER CO,
INLAND EASTEX
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
VIRGINIA FIBRE CORP.
BEAR ISLAND PAPER CO, UP.
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
WESTVACOCORP.
UNION CAMP CORP
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
ST. LAURENT PAPER PRODUCTS COR
PUTNEY PAPER CO IMC.
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.
JAMES RIVER CORP,
WEYERHAEUSER CO
SCOTT PAPER CO.
LONGVIEW FIBRE CO
NORTH PACIFIC PAPER CORP,
WEYERHAEUSER CO
DAISHOWA AMERICA CO. LTD.
RAYONIER
PORT TOWNSEND PAPER CORP,
INLAND EMPIRE PAPER CO.
RAINY RIVER FOREST PRODUCTS IN
SIMPSON TACOMA KRAFT CO.
PONDERAY NEWSPRINT CO.
BOISE CASCADE CORP.
BOISE CASCADE CORP.
KERWIN PAPER CO.
REBBRE
JAMES RIVER CORP.
WAUSAU PAPER MILLS
APPLETON PAPERS INC.
GLOBE BUILDING: MATERIALS INC,
ECOFIBRE INC.
FOX RIVER fIBER CO
POPE S TALBOT INC
FORD HOWARD CORP:
PROCTER AND GAMBLE
THIMANY PULP AND PAPER
REPAP WISCONSIN INC.
STREET ADDRESS
5600 VR61NIA AVE,; ::; : ; :: ! i ••:; ;: : : : : i : : :
POBOXB
PAPER MILL RD.
700 S. KAMINSKI ST.
NORTH SECOND ST.
POBOX8
50ZOHWY11S
W 45TH ST. & CENTRAL AVE
POBOSSJ
PO BOX 1964
2906 JOHNSTON ST. NW
5600 KIMBERLY WAY
iaoi TCLMAN STREET:
PO BOX 70384
PO BOX 299
SHELDON MILL
LUPKINMLL
PO BOX 2500
PO BOX 872
PO BOX 816
PO BOX B70
PO BOX 339
PO BOX 2119
PO BOX 40
10* E RIVERSIDE ST.
34040 UNION CAMP DR.
910 INDUSTRIAL ST.
19TH & MAIN STS.
OLD DEPOT SO.
300 W. LAUREL ST.
4TH4 ADAMS STS
1701 1ST STREET
2600 FEDERAL WAY
PO BOX 639
PO BOX 2069
PO BOX 188
1942 MARINE DRIVE
700 N ENNIS ST.
PO BOX 3170
N3320ARGONNERD
4302 CHAMBERS CREEK RD
801 PORTLAND AVE.
422767 HWY 20
907W.7THST.
PO BOX 500
801 S. LAWE ST.
3001 E GLENDALE AVE
2301 LAKE SHORE DR. E.
PO BOX 305
SO BRIDGE ST.
500 FORTUNE AVE.
1751 W.MATTHEW OR.
1200 FOREST ST.
1919 S BROADWAY
501 EASTMAN AVE
THUMANYROAD
433 NORTH MAIN STREET
CITY
CHARLESTON;:;: ".•.: -•
EASTOVER
FLORENCE
GEORGETOWN
HAHTSVtLE
SELLERS
CALHQUN
CHATTANOOGA
COUNCe
KINGSPORT
KNOXVILLE
LOUDON
MEMPHIS
MEMPHIS
NEWJOHNSONVIILE
HOUSTON
CUFX1N
ORANGE
PASADENA
SILSBEE
TEXARKANA
AMHERST
ASHLAND
BIG ISLAND
COVINQTON
FRANKLIN
HOPEWELL
WEST POINT
PUTNEY
BELLINGHAM
CAMAS
COSMOPOLIS
EVERETT
LONGVIEW
LONGVIEW
LONGVIEW
PORT ANGELES
PORT ANGELES
PORT TOWNSEND
SPOKANE
STEItCOOM
TACOMA
USK
VANCOUVER
WAUULA
APPLETON
APPLETON
ASHLAND
8ROKAW
COMBINED LOCKS
CORNELL
DE PERE
DEPERE
EAU CLAIRE
GREEN BAY
GREEN BAY
KAUKAUNA
KIMBERLY
ST
su:
sc
sc
sc
sc
sc
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VT
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
Wl
Ml
Wl
Wl
Wl
wt
Wl
Wl
Wl
Wl
Wl
W)
Wl
EPA
RGN
04:;;;
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
06
06
06
OS
06
06
03
03
03
01
03
OJ
03
01
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1ft
05
-------
Pulp Manufacturers Data Summary
Table B
Dala pulled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Dala (or Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row?
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
185
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
20?
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
NAME
WESTVACOCORP.
UNION CAMP CORP
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
SONOCO PRODUCTS CO.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
BOWATERINC,
SOUTHERN CELLULOSE PRODUCTS IN
PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA
MEAD CORP
TAMKO ROOFING PRODUCTS. WC
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP
BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORP
PONDEROSA OF TENNESSEE
INLAND CONTAINER CORP.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP:
INLAND PAPERBOARD AND PACKAGIN
SIMPSON PASWJENA PAPER CO:
INLAND EASTEX
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
VIRGINIA FIBRE CORP
BEAR ISLAND PAPER CO, IP
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
WESTVACOCORP.
UNION CAMP CORP
STONE CONTAJNER CORP:
ST. LAURENT PAPER PRODUCTS COR
PUTNEY PAPER CO. INC:
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.
JAMES RIVER CORP.
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
SCOTT PAPER CO.
LONGVIEVV FIBRE CO.
NORTH PACIFIC PAPER CORP.
WEYERHAEUSER CO
OAISHOWA AMERICA CO. LTD
RAYONIER
PORT TOVWtSENO PAPER CORP.
INLAND EMPIRE PAPER CO.
BAitW fHVER FOREST PRODUCTS IN
SIMPSON TACOMA KRAFT CO
PONDERAY NEWSPRINT CO
BOISE CASCADE CORP
BOISE CASCADE CORP
KERWIN PAPER CO
REF1BRE
JAMES RIVER CORP
WAUSAU PAPER MILLS
APPLETON PAPERS INC.
GLOBE BUILDING MATERIALS INC
ECOFIBRE INC
FOX RIVER FIBER CO
POPE & TALBOT INC
FORD HOWARD CORP,
PROCTER AND GAMBLE
THILMANY PULP AND PAPER
REPAP WISCONSIN INC
Inspections (2 years
Air
Total
Average
See Note 1
3.1
1
2
J
2
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
NP
0
4
1
1
3
3
3
2
4
2
»
14
7
8
0
1
2
1
S
3
NP
1
3
1
1
1
B
1
NP
2
1
0
NP
2
3
0
2
NP
NP
1
0
0
1
3
Waler
Total
Average
See Note 1
27
4
7
t
t
3
NP
2
NP
a
2
NP
2
1
NP
1
1
t
2
D
1
0
2
NP
5
a
3
o
4
1
2
5
5
1
6
NP
4
S
4
6
0
2
3
1
2
3
2
NP
0
0
1
0
NP
NP
2
2
2
1
2
RCRA
Total
Average
SaaNoti 1
0.5
0
1
0
0
1
0
o
0
6
0
0
2
0
NP
0
2
1
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
5
Z
5
0
0
O
0
1
0
NP
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
n
2
0
0
NP
NP
NP
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Average
SaaNotal
5.4
5
10
B
10
S
2
2
1
ft
2
0
4
2
NP
1
7
4
4
5
4
i
4
5
7
17
22
9
17
1
3
7
6
7
9
NP
6
8
5
T
1
6
5
2
5
4
2
0
4
3
1
2
NP
NP
3
2
2
2
5
Historical Noncompliance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompiance
event)
Air
A«fW
SaaNota 1
1.0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NP
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
IS
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
NP:
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
NP
NP
2
2
0
3
2
Watar
Awjrage
See Note 1
16
0
0
0
2
0
0
tt
0
0
0
0
0
2
NP
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
3
1
4
NP
4
4
3
0
1
5
1
4
0
5
8
0
1
1
8
0
NP
NP
0
2
0
a
2
RCRA
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
O.S
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
a
0
0
1
0
NP
0
1
0
8
1
0
8
0
0
0
Q
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
NP
0
0
0
0
o
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
NP
NP
0
0
0
a
0
A. W, R
Average
SaaNota 2
2.6
a
0
0
7
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
1
2
NP
2
1
a
8
i
0
8
1
6
2
0
1
6
4
0
8
1
3
1
4
NP
4
4
3
0
1
5
1
4
0
5
8
0
1
1
8
8
NP
NP
2
t
0
3
3
Perrnt Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
• of
pollutants
overkmit
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
2.0
2
1
t
1
4
NP
2
NP
1
0
NP
1
2
NP
1
1
1
2
0
0
2
3
NP
2
2
0
0
1
0
0
t
3
1
1
NP
2
1
3
3
1
3
3
g
0
0
1
NP
2
3
3
0
NP
NP
0
t
2
2
0
* or poftjtarts
regulated
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
125
8
12
8
13
2»
NP
21
NP
8
13
NP
6
3
NP
7
10
9
13
0
8
11
13
NP
16
8
6
0
9
0
6
7
8
7
8
W
10
T
6
»
9
7
8
9
6
$
19
NP
16
29
18
0
NP
NP
10
1»
14
»
12_
i of reports
over Nmt
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
60
4
1
2
3
B
NP
e
NP
i
0
NP
3
4
NP
1
\
2
5
0
0
3
5
NP
2
S
0
0
9
0
0
3
11
S
5
NP
24
J
15
8
1
5
6
0
0
ft
1
NP
8
4
8
0
NP
NP
0
2
3
a
0
* of reports
sutxnttad
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
382.4
29?
372
178
300
1,061
NP
877
NP
142
271
NP
96
1S2
NP
125
244
223
164
0
269
298
267
NP
893
320
116
0
240
0
167
215
245
146
299
NP
356
139
122
483
200
183
237
1)7
138
265
289
NP
391
1,318
1.048
0
NP
NP
345
318
317
580
577
Significant Noncompiance Indicator
Air
Percent of
Faciktjes
SaaNota 1
19.4%
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
NP
Y
Y
N
Y:
N
N:
N
NP
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
NP
NP
N
N:
N
N
Watar
Percent of
Facihbes
See Note 1
7.7%
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
NP
N
N
NP
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
¥
Y
NP
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
NP
N
N
Y
N
NP
NP
N
N
N
N
N
RCRA
Percent of
Fac-kbas
SaaNotal
0.0%
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W
N
N
N
N
fj
N
N
N
N
N:
N
N
N
N
N
NP
NP
NP
N
N
N
N
N
A'W-R
Average
See Note!
0.3
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
:0
1
0
0
t
0
0
o
1
1
2
2
0
2
1
0
1
Q
Q
o
0
0
^
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years
Air
Avaraga
Sea Note 1
0,3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ft
1
0
0
&
NP
ft
2
6
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
0
0
o
o
0
i
2
NP
Q
0
o
ft
rj
Q
Q
NP
0
^
0
NP
0
ft
0
0
NP
NP
0
0
0
0
water
Av»w
See Note 1
0.2
1
1
0
0
0
NP
0
NP
ft
0
f(P
0
0
NP
0
2
ft
0
0
0
1
0
:NP
0
ft
0
ft
0
0
2
S
5
1
4
NP
2
2
2
2
Q
]
2
0
0
(j
Q
NP
0
ft
0
0
NP
NP
0
0
0
6
RCRA
Average
See Note 1
0.0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
NP
0
0
0
0
g
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
rj
0
0
o
0
o
0
o
NP
Q
0
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
D
0
Q
Q
0
0
0
0
NP
NP
NP
0
0
0
0
Total
Average
See Note 1
b~5
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
NP
0
4
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
3
0
0
2
6
5
t
6
NP
2
t
2
2
Q
^
2
Q
0
^
c
0
0
0
0
a
NP
NP
0
0
0
0
Note 1 Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2 Average of number of Quarters with a violation or noncompiance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Nole 3 Average number of programs in which faciities are considered to be In significant noncompiance (maximum varue=3)
Nole 5 ml ir^ca!" !! NOT cZ.™bt .Zs ilS, «dc£ 1^'"^^' "T T""!? " 1""** VehiCleS*"r; "* Mlls: ^ «"""'*
Note 6 1!!^^^^^^^ " °* *" 0bSWV"i°nS """
Note 7 Average of those with a soil amount reported
NP = no permit/ID* Identified; NC = value not calculated; Inact = Inactive permll/IDl.
"«™'**'.y; '™ and Steel Mis: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
53
-------
Pulp Manufacturers Data Summary
Table C
Data puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data (or Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
;ow*
IT'S
176
177
178
m
180
181
182
183
184
1S5
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
703
204
205
206
20?
208
209
210
311
212
713
214
115
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
NAME
wEstvAco'coRp:
UNION CAMP CORP
STONE CONTAINER CORP:
NTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
SONOCO PRODUCTS CO.
NTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
BOWATER INC,
SOUTHERN CELLULOSE PRODUCTS IN
PACKAGING CORP Of AMERICA
MEAD CORP.
TAMKD ROOFING PRODUCTS; WO:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
BUCKEYE CeLlUlOS6 CORP
PONDEROSAOF TENNESSEE
NLANO CONTAINER CORP,
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL: CORP:
INLAND PAPERBOARO AND PACKAGIN
SIMPSON PASADENA: PAPER co:
INLAND EASTEX
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
VIRGINIA FIBRE CORP.
BEAR ISLAND PAPER CO. LP
GEORGIA'PACIFIC CORP
WESTVACOCORP.
UNION CAMP CORP
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
ST. LAURENT PAPER PRODUCTS COR
PUTNEY PAPER CO INC
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
JAMES RIVER CORP,
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
SCOTT PAPER CO
LONGVIEW FIBRE CO.
NORTH PACffIC PAPER CORP:
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
DAISHOWA AMERICA CO- LTD
RAYONIER
PORT T6WNS6ND PAPER CORP.
INLAND EMPIRE PAPER CO.
RAINY RIVER FOREST PRODUCTS IN
SIMPSON TACOMA KRAFT CO.
PONDERAY NEWSPRINT CO;:
BOISE CASCADE CORP.
BOISE CASCADE CORP.
KERWIN PAPER CO
REF1BRE
JAMES RIVER CORP.
WAUSAU PAPER MILLS
APPLETON PAPERS INC
GLOBE 8WLOING MATERIALS INC
ECOFIBRE INC.
FOX RIVER FIBER CO
POPE t, TALBOT INC.
FORD HOWARD CORP.
PROCTER AND GAMBLE
THILMANY PULP AND PAPER
REPAP WISCONSIN INC.
Production
*****
SM Notes 1« <
1.016
2,300
1,880
1.800
1,200
2,480
180
2,300
630
220
256
200
680
1.375
1.220
1,777
875
2,250
1,730
1.125
630
830
2.900
1.900
1,250
2.320
70
700
1,490
440
3.000
2.000
3,270
450
440
575
250
545
1.320
680
330
1.218
145
80
60
480
200
220
155
1,103
550
1.435
TRI Releases
199B- Tow Pounds
SMNote t
1.009,463
3.426,710
1.876.969
2.209.294
2.959.850
436,892
27.038
1,612.957
1.085.983
2.179,513
703.405
0
40.550
25S
5
1,521,255
916.090
1.427,557
1,704,914
1,223,380
927,665
2.045,376
402.790
8T.020
950.134
4.574,092
3.369,176
1.W7.TO
1,253.056
(met
1.038,640
1,3W,S70
563.51 S
615,780
661.950
NP
4.526.372
*7,0»6
1.263.370
509,402
Imct
10,000
884.995
7*,52fl
28
1.2S4,!56
Inact
tract
505
452,148
236.914
bKt
NP
NP
15.227
2,584,124
1
463,949
59,770
TRI Transfers
1998 - ToW Pounds
»<**»
SMNott 1
201.719
130,427
0
a
0
250
110
0
724,430
0
7
1,301
0
0
5
:0
0
0
0
4.998,000
0
0
0
172
0
0
0
4.172.200
0
Mact
2,026
17,000
0
260
0
NP
241.574
0
0
0
Inact
0
0
6
0
0
Inact
tnect
0
0
21,704
*HK(
NP
NP
565
89,150
0
0
2,461
TRI Releases *
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ produchcn ixws
Average
See Notes Ij 5
11780
1.548-6
9995
1.227,4
NC
38*3
NC
8557
10.057.9
947.6
1.116.5
,:5,9
NC
10
0.1
1,9430
6677
442.3
9594
9.Z18.B.
412.3
1.16* 1
358.0
1087
1.144.7
1.575.S
1,7733
4.927,9
540.1
NC
1,486.7
8400
1'.280.7
NC
220.7
NG
1,458.1
1936
2.8713
8859
NC
18.4
670.5
109,6
0.1
1,037.1
NC
NC
8.4
942.0
NC
NC
NC
NC
101.9
2,405.5
NC
84J.S
434
TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
SeefMe 1
94718
122,797
181.650
134,820
294.500
8s>«or
27.038
104,680
0
140,500
47,890
0
40.550
0
0
0
396.964
M6.160
85.500
631,000
125,255
96,120
80.243
0
92.200
367.685
301,727
59,000
30,246
wad
299,863
334,055
44,000
1-H.4SO
44,015
NP
887,507
0
163,750"
6,080
Inact
0
76,704
g
0
27,964
Imct
Inset
0
203,000
0
««cf
NP
NP
0
77,250
0
19,91*
0
TRI Releases »
Transfers -
Metals
1996 -ToW Pounds
A»KW
See Note 1
' 55/143
128,660
104.750
0
0
1.0W
0
588,810
0
6
0
0
0
9
0
0
177.413
fr
0
0
0
0-
0
0
288.550
100,240
125,000
0
0
Inact
13.558
i,2SQ
0
0
0
NP
222.802
0
50.600
0
Inact
6
0
o
0
0
Imct
Imct
0
0
31.716
Inact
NP
NP
0
88,655
0
0
0
TRI Production -
Related Waste
1999 -Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
7,129,139
f4,841,178
8.816.728
7.884,OM
17.882.256
57$,W
39,691
5,129,384
6.856.272
9.241,000
2,141.264
32,400
0
5,952
1.354.310
1,514,000
1.907,005
8,r3i,28«
11,110.096
4.803,990
20.762.704
14,419,416
3.429.932
296.162
9.354.896
17.900,352
31.128.304
6.240.38B
4.904.568
lf*3
11,275,296
16,808,520
3,480.200
5,Jir,81S
8,140,388
NP
21,093.584
«7,0f6
4.238,100
3,723,080
Inact
78,800
8,037.788
115,203
30
7,626,268
Imct
40,874
1.172,560
260,917
(met
NP
NP
268,600
3,180,032
1
3.918,044
689,450
Pollutant Spils
Spil OccuroncB
Parcant ol
FacilbBS
377%
¥
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
¥
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
¥
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
ast 2 years)
#ol Spits
Avaraoa
3!6
1
3
2
1
4
\
2
5
2
3
1
1
12
1
5
3
6
3
2
1
1
1
1
Amu* Spiled |bs)
AMrag*
11,879
132
78
60
175
2.586
2,500
50
2,000
7,687
70
81,726
355
17T
1.067
10.377
5
21,007
70
250
1.151
47.000
Surrounding
Population
Residents nithn 3
nitos
AMrog*
SMNote!
24.957
34,424
2.061
use
10,451
«,232
761
2,246
41,588
1.452
29,973
72.995
6,049
1*1,471
69,889
8,401
7.42*
2.640
59.091
1,406
3,750
1,388
0
7,033:
8,175
22:219
3,041
1,831
45,616
12,966
9.919
36,181
23,579
23,579
33,233
15.631
17,075
3,800
33.276
44,706
59,824
44,509
86,532
82,153
7815
6,819
31,894
2,068
2,066
2,066
47,748
77,283
57,463
2io7a
45,543
Note 1: Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2 Average of number of quarters with • violation or noncompfance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs In which tadMta are considered to be in significant noncomplance. (maximum valued)
Note 4 This indcator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector: Automobile Assembly: vehicles/year; Pulp Mils: short Ions/day; Petroleum Refining: barrelsWay; Iron and Steel Mils: short loretfyear; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5: This Indicator Is NOT comparable across Industiy lectors. Average ii calculated lor etch sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 6: Average of those with at least one spil reported.
Note 7 Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP = no permiWD* Identified; NC = value not calculated; Inact = Inactive permit/ID*
54
-------
Pulp Manufacturers Location Data
Table A
Data puled on July 13.1996 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysts (IDEA) System
Row*
'Ml
242
:2'43
244
245
246
247
NAME
PONPEROSAPUIP PRODUCTS
FRASIER PAPERS INC.. PARK FALL
BADGER PAPER MIIU INC.
GEORGIA'PACIFIC CORP
WEYERHAEUSER CO
PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA
CONSOLIDATED PAPERS, INC.
STREET ADDRESS
2800 N MAIN ST.
200 N FIRST AVE.
200 W. FRONT ST.
100 WISCONSIN RIVER DR
200 GRAND AVE
N9090 COUNTY RD E
9504THAVE N
CITY
OSHKOSH
PARK FALLS
PESHTK3O
PORT EDWARDS
ROTHSCHILD
TOMAHAWK
WISCONSIN RAPIDS
ST
Wt
Wl
Wl
Wl
Wt
Wl
Wf
EPA
RGN
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
55
-------
Pulp Manufacturers Data Summary
Table B
Data puled on Jury 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
NAME
PONDEROSA PULP PRODUCTS
FRASIER PAPERS INC.. PARK FALL
BADGER PAPER MILLS INC
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
PACKAGING CORP. OF AMERICA
CONSOLIDATED PAPERS. INC
Inspections (2 years)
Air
Tot*
Avaraga
SaaNoto 1
3.1
NP
3
i
6
NP
1
1
Water
Total
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
27
NP
2
1
2
D
2
3
RCRA
Total
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
05
0
0
^
0
o
0
«
Total
Avaraga
S«Noto 1
54
0
5
3
t
D
3
10
Historical Noncomplance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncomptance
event)
Air
Avaraga
SMNoto 1
1.0
0
0
0
1
0
8
8
Water
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
1.6
ft
2
1
2
1
0
1
RCRA
Avarma
SaeNota 1
0.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
A. W. R
Avaraga
SaaNota:
26
0
2
1
3
1
e
8
Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
• of
poMarts
ovarimt
Aviraga
SaaNota 1
2.0
NP
2
a
1
i
0
1
iof pohjtants
ragulatad
Avaraga
SaaNotel
12.5
MP
12
«
18
17
16
«
aofraports
ovarlmrt
A/araga
SaaNola 1
6.0
NP
7
a
5
1 :
0
1
• orraports
submBad
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
382.4
NP
417
440
1.051
734
497
1.260
Significant Noncomplance Indicator
Air
Parcant of
Faahbas
SaaNota 1
19.4%
NP
Y
N
Y
NP
N
Y
water
Parcart of
Facrtbas
SaaNoto 1
7.7%
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
RCRA
Parcart of
Facilbas
SaaNota t
00%
N
N
HI
N
N
N
N
A*W+R
Avaraga
SaaNota 3
0.3
0
1
«
1
0
0
1
Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years
Air
Avaraga
SaaNotal
0.3
l#>
0
6
0
W
0
0
Watar
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
0.2
NF>
0
ft
0
0
0
0
RCRA
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
0.0
0
0
a
0
a
0
0
Total
Avaraga
SaaNotel
0.5
D
0
B
0
D
0
0
Note 1: Average Is calculated across al entries wtth value of 0 or greater.
Note 2: Average of number of quarters with a violation or mncomplance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act. Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs In which fadHJes are considered to be In significant noncomplance. (maximum value=3)
Note 4: This indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector: Automobile Assembly: vehicles/year; Pulp Mils: short Ions/day, Petroleum Refining: barrete/day; Iron and Sled Mib: short Ions/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric Ions/year
Note 5 This Indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. Average Is calculated for each sector using only those observations wrth nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 6 Avenge of those with it least one spll reported
Note 7: Average of those with a soil amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID* Identified: NC = value not calculated; Inact = Inactive permit/ID*
56
-------
Pulp Manufacturers Data Summary
Table C
Data puled on July 13, 1 998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
2*1
242
243
244
245
246
?47
NAME
PONDEROSA PULP PRODUCTS
FRASIER PAPERS INC. PARK FALL
BADGER PAPER MILS INC
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
PACKAGING CORP Of AMERICA
CONSOLIDATED PAPERS. INC.
Production
Short Tons/Day
Average
See Notes 1*4
1.016
200
375
225
500
350
1.370
982
TRI Releases
1998 -Total Pounds
Average
See Note i
1,009.463
tract
62.999
1,465
2,071.755
101,406
562.502
2.628.M4
TRI Transfers
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
201.719
(met
0
250
0
23.823
0
8.282.600
TRI Releases •
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ production irtts
Average
Saa Notas IX 5
1178.0
NO
168.0
r.e
4.143.5
357,«
410.6
tt.110.8
TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
Saa Nota 1
94,718
hact
30.045
0
92.061
0
0
35,000
TRI Releases +
Transfers -
Metals
199B- Total Pounds
Average
See Note i
39.143
mart
2.208
6
0
35,940
307.814
0
TRI Production -
Related Waste
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
7.129.139
toacf
6,378,512
),59<
9,313,408
2.535, W4
841,902
14i7ftt44
Potute.nl Spils (last 2 years)
Spil Occurranca
Percent ot
Facifctes
37.714
N
N
N
Y
1
N
Y
I of SPINS
Average
Sa*Nota6
36
3
1
4
Amount Spited (bs)
Avaraga
Saa Nota 7
11,879
90
50
S»
Surrounding
Population
Residents within 3
miles
Anrage
See Note 1
24,957
48.354
4.159
3.590
6.674
18.45)
3,316
*!>,ȣ
Note 1 Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2: Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3 Average number of programs in which fadilies are considered to be In significant noncomplance. (maximum value=3)
Note 4 This indlcalor Is NOT comparable across industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector: Automobile Assembly: vehides*/ear; Pulp Mils, short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: barrete/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short Ions/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric Ions/year
Note 5 TNs Indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors. Average Is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 6 Average of those with at least one spil reported.
Note 7: Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP = no permit/ICW Identified, NC = value not calculated; Inact = inactive permit/ID*
57
-------
-------
Petroleum Refineries Location Data
Table A
Data puled on July 13,1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
e
7
B
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IS
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Vss
36
: »
38
39
40
41
42
!: 43
44
•: 45
46
: 47
4S
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
NAME
TESQRO ALASKA PETROLEUM CO
ARCO ALASKA INC.
MAPCOINC
PETRO STAR INC
ARCO ALASKA INC;
PETRO STAR INC.
COASTAL MOBILE REPINING CO
SHELL CHEMICAL CO.. MOBILE SIT
HUNT REFINING COMPANY INC
LION OIL CO INC
CROSS OIL t REFINING CO INC
BERRY PETROLEUM CO.
INTERMOUNf AIM REFINING CO., IN
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CAL
KERN Oil & REFINING CO
SAN JOAQUIN REFINING CO INC
SUNLAND REFINING CORP.
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
EXXON CORPORATION
HUNTWAY REFINING CO
CHEVRON USA INC
PACIFIC REFINING COMPANY
PETROLEUM FUEL* TERMINAL (TEX
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY
SHELL OIL COMPANY
TOSCO CORPORATION
WITCO CORPORATION
TENBY INC.
PARAMOUNT PETROLEUM CORP
CHEVRON USA INC
UNION OIL COMPANY OP CAL
POWERINE OIL COMPANY
LUNDAYTHAGARDCO.
MOBIL PETROLEUM COMPANY INC
HUNTWAY REFINING CO
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
ULTRAMAR INC
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CAL
COLORADO REFINING
CONOCO INC
STAR ENTERPRISE
YOUNG REFINING CORPORATION
CITSO ASPHALT REFINING CO.
BHP PETROLEUM AMERICAS REF
CHEVRON USA INC
CLARK OIL & REFINING CORP
CLARK OIL » REFINING CORP
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
INDIAN REFINING PARTNERSHIP
UNO-VEN COMPANY
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
SHELL OIL COMPANY
LAKETON REFINING INC
COUNTRYMARK COOPERATIVE INC.
AMOCO OIL CO-
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES INC
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
STREET ADDRESS
KENAI SPUR ROAD
NORTH SLOPE
1100 H1H LANE
1200 HIM LANE
400 INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY, EXTENS
1000MCHENRYST
424 SASTSTH STREET
HWY 57-N-BERRY RD
2555 WILLOW ROAD
324WELSEGUNDO
4901 SAN PABLO AVE
2050 EtHSON WAY
3485 PACHECO BLVD
AVON REFINERY
14708 DOWNEY AVE
12354 LAKELAND AVE
3301 S GARFIELD
3700 WEST 190THST
1651 ALAMEOA ST
2101 E PACIFIC COAST
1660 W. ANAHEIM ST
5800 BRIGHTON BLVO
5801 BRIGHTON BLVD.
2000 WRANGLE HB.LRD
7982 HUEY ROAD
FOUNDATION DRIVE
91-325 KOMOHANA ST,
91-480 MALAKOLS, C1P
20t£ HAWTHORNE
B7THST
135THSTJ.NEWAVE
MARATHON AVENUE
2784 WEST LUKENS LAK
1200 REFINERY RD
28 15 INDIANAPOLIS BL
1400 S. M ST.
B36-T16E-R34S
1401 S DOUGLAS ROAD
CITY
KENAI
KUPARUK
NORTH POLE
NORTH POLE
PRUOHOEBAY
VALDEZ
CHICKASAW
SARALAND
TUSCALQOSA
EL DORADO
SMACROVER
STEPHENS
FREDONIA
ARROYO GRANDE
BAKERSFIELO
BAKERSFIELD
BAKERSFIELO
BAKERSFIELD
BENICIA
BENICIA
ELSEGUNDO
HERCULES
LONG BEACH
LOS ANGELES
MARTINEZ
MARTINEZ
OHDAtG
OXNARD
PARAMOUNT
RICHMOND
RODEO
SANTA FE SPRINGS
SOUTH GATE
TOR RANGE
WILMINGTON
WILMINGTON
WILMINGTON
WILMINGTON
COMMERCE CITY
COMMERCE CITY
DELAWARE CITY
DOUGLASVILLE
SAVANNAH
EWA BEACH
KAPOtEl
BLUE ISLAND
HARTFORD
JOLIET
LAWHENCEyiLlE
LEMONT
ROBINSON
ROXANA/WOODR
LAKETON
MOUNT VERNON
WHITING
ARKANSAS CITY
COFFEYVILLE
EL DORADO
ST
AK
AK
AK
AK
AK
AK
AL
AL
AL
AR
AR
AR
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
DE
GA
GA
HI
HI
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
IN
IN
KS
K.S
KS
EPA
RGN
10
10
10
10
10
10
04
04
04
06
06
06
09
09
OS
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
O9
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
08
08
03
04
<)«
09
09
05
05
05
05
05
OS
05
05
05
35
07
07
07
59
-------
Petroleum Refineries Data Summary
Table B
Data pulled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
WME
TESORO ALASKA PETROLEUM CO
ARCO ALASKA INC
MAPCOINC
PETRO STAR INC.
ARCO ALASKA INC.
PETRO STAR INC
COASTAL MOBILE RCTINHWS CO
SHELL CHEMICAL CO.. MOBILE SIT
HUNT REFINING COMPANY INC
LION OIL CO INC
CROSS OIL ft REFINING CO INC
BERRY PETROLEUM CO.
NTERMOUNTAIN REFINING CO. IN
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CAL
KERN Oil 8. REFINING CO.
SAN JOAQUIN REFINING CO INC
SUNLAND REFINING CORP.
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
EXXON CORPORATION
HUNTWAY REFINING CO.
CHEVRON USA INC
PACIFIC REFINING COMPANY
PETROLEUM FUEL & TERMINAL (TEX
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY
SHELL Oil COMPANY
TOSCO CORPORATION
WITCOCORPORiATION
TENBY INC.
PARAMOUNT PETROLEUM CDRP
CHEVRON USA INC
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CAt
POWERINE OIL COMPANY
LUNDAY THAGARD CO.
MOBIL PETROLEUM COMPANY INC
HUNTWAY REFINING CO
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
ULTRAMAR INC
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CAL
COLORADO R£flN|N<3
CONOCO INC
STAR ENTERPRISE
YOUNG REFINING CORPORATION
CJTCO ASPHALT REFINING CO.
BMP PETROLEUM AMERICAS REF
CHEVRON USA INC
CLARK OIL 4 REFINING CORP
CLARK OIL * REFINING CORP
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
INDIAN REFINING PARTNERSHIP
UNO-VEN COMPANY
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
SHELL OIL COMPANY
LAKETON REFINING INC
COUNTRYMARK COOPERATIVE INC.
AMOCO OIL CO
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES INC
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
nspections (2 years
Air
Total
SaaNota 1
35
::• :0
NP
0
1
1
0
4
5
4
4
1
1
0
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
1
0
3
1
0
2
NP
3
1
1
3
3
2
2
3
3
0
5
3
22
3
2
2
1
NP
10
NP
NP
NP
14
10
0
3
17
4
2
11
Water
Total
So Note 1
2.2
;:;: :ii:i
NP
0
NP
0
0
3
2
1
3
2
3
NP
3
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
NP
1
1
NP
2
0
1
0
NP
1
5
0
2
NP
2
NP
3
t
1
1
1
23
0
2
NP
D
0
4
1
NP
2
2
5
3
8
2
2
4
2
RCRA
TOM
SaaNota 1
2.6
•:':':':'::M'4
0
2
0
2
0
1
3
10
6
0
NP
NP
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Iff
13
6
2
ft
3
4
3
2
1
0
5
12
10
0
6
6
5
12
2
Total
Avafeoa
SaaNota 1
7.6
;::;;::;::5
0
2
1
3
0
t
10
15
13
4
4
0
5
2
2
7
2
1
2
i
2
0
5
f
1
3
0
4
7
1
5
3
5
2
6
4
1
16
17
Sf
5
4
5
9
3
15
2
0
7
28
25
3
17
27
11
18
15
Historical NoncompHance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompHance
event)
Air
Av»«.
SMNott 1
2.0
;:::;:::::0
b
0
0
0
8
0
2
0
0
0
4
D
0
0
0
8
6
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
1
0
8
0
0
g
0
0
a
0
0
0
«
8
0
0
a
0
1
2
Wat"
A«afaaa
SaaNota 1
2.0
l':;::::::.^
b
6
0
0
8
0
3
0
1
0
1
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
i
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
a
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
D
3
6
1
0
0
2
0
4
0
1
8
8
7
RCRA
Avaraga
SaaNota t
3.7
;:::;;;::::i
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
a
8
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
g
0
8
B
0
a
8
8
8
0
B
«
6
a
0
a
0
t
8
0
8
a
B
8
8
A W R
Avaraga
SMNott 2
4.9
::;:::;;;;:;;;;:3
g
s
0
0
8
0
5
2
8
0
5
0
0
0
0
8
6
2
2
8
1
0
0
»
8
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
8
0
8
0
a
8
6
a
1
8
0
*
8
4
e
a
8
8
8
Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Ad (2
year data)
lot
pohjtants
OOTtmit
Aviraja
SMNota 1
4.1
•'::.:.':--:.'.lt
NP
0
NP
0
0
0
5
i
4
5
2
NP
15
NP
NP
NP
NP
4
NP
3
10
NP
2
2
4
«
NP
0
0
S
3
NP
5
NP
6
0
0
2
6
8
0
0
NP
2
0
a
4
NP
1
2
2
2
3
S
0
8
5
totpolutants
raotlataa
A»araga
SMNota t
25.9
'•• K:-:\t
NP
0
NP
D
0
0
20
19
20
13
21
NP
88
NP
NP
NP
NP
47
NP
89
43
NP
115
42
100
&
NP
Q
130
117
120
NP
114
NP
14
0
12
18
31
14
0
u
NP
16
0
11
15
NP
14
19
16
18
11
18
18
20
19
1 of reports
ovaf fcnut
Avngt
SaaNota 1
11.2
i;;.: ;;;.3S
NP
0
NP
D
0
0
8
7
6
11
3
NP
45
NP
NP
NP
NP
7
NP
E
31
NP
3
3
10
a
NP
D
0
7
4
NP
6
NP
18
D
0
2
16
9
0
a
NP
2
0
19
9
NP
3
3
5
3
4
8
0
32
14
t of reports
sutxnttud
Avwagt
SMNota 1
874.2
• •'-'-• --4K
NP
0
NP
0
0
0
1.276
48S
952
54)
407
rs>
950
M»
NP
NP
NP
1.416
NP
748
745
NP
1.143
1,280
1,014
0
NP
0
2.767
1,97*
3.307
NP
2.719
Nf>
306
0
312
532
4.208
587
0
0
NP
282
0
254
736
NP
575
874
966
833
253
709
483
438
414
Sianlficant Noneomptance Indicator
Air
Pareartol
Faciwas
SaaNotal
363%
::::::•::'::<(
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
: N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
tt
N
Y
NP
Y
NP
NP
NP
¥
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
watar
Parcart of
Facihtias
SaaNotal
6.114
::::::::: Y
NP
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
N
NP
Y
N
NP
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
NP
N
MP
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
RCRA
Parcart at
Faciltjas
SaaNota 1
123%
::::•::•:::$
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
NP
NP
N
N
N
N
N
tt
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
A+W'R
wngi
SaaNota 3
0.5
;-::;;:;;::::;;:j:'
6
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
6
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
ft
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ft
0
0
1
2
1
1
2
ft
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
2
1
0
1
0
2
0
Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years
Air
A~aca
SaaNotal
1.1
'::• \W\\0
NP
•f
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
4
2
4
D
NP
1
1
9
0
1
2
0
1
D
0
t
0
1
0
d
2
D
NP
1
NP
NP
NP
2
1
D
0
0
0
0
1
Watar
A»TO
SaaNotal
0.3
::i:::;;:;i
NP
0
NP
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NP
0
NP
NP
NP
NP
d
NP
g
1
NP
0
0
0
0
NP
0
1
1
0
NP
0
NP
0
g
0
0
0
1
0
d
NP
D
0
1
2
NP
0
d
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
RCRA
Avaraj»
SaaNotal
0.3
: :':•:•: :!:':S
0
0
0
0
0
fl
1
1
1
0
NP
NP
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
Petroleum Refineries Data Summary
Table C
Data puled on July 13, 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
NAME
TESORO ALASKA PETROLSUM CO
ARCO ALASKA INC.
MAPCOINC
PETRO STAR INC
ARCO ALASKA INC
PETRO STAR INC
coAstAi MOBILE REFININQ co.
SHELL CHEMICAL CO , MOBILE SIT
HUNT REFINING COMPANY INC
LION OIL CO INC
CROSS OIL:* REFINING, co INC
BERRY PETROLEUM CO.
1NTERMOUNTASM REFffflNG CO. , IN
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CAL
KERN;6lL t REFINING CO
SAN JOAQUIN REFINING CO INC
SUNLANO REFINING CORP:
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
EXXON CORPORATION
HUNTWAY REFINING CO
CHEVRON USA INC
PACIFIC REFINING COMPANY
PETROLEUM FUEL & TERMINAL (TEX
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY
SHELL OIL COMPANY
TOSCO CORPORATION
WITCO CORPORATION
TENBYINC.
PARAMOUNT PETROLEUM CORP
CHEVRON USA INC
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CAL
POWERINE OIL COMPANY
LUNDAY THAGARD CO
MOBIL PETROLEUM COMPANY INC
HUNTWAY REFINING CO:
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
ULTRAMAR INC
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CAL
COLORADO REFINING
CONOCO INC
STAR ENTERPRISE
YOUNG REFINING CORPORATION
CITOO ASPHALT REFIMNS co
BHP PETROLEUM AMERICAS REF
CHEVRON USA INC
CLARK OIL & REFINING CORP '
CLARK OIL 1 REFINING CORP
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
INDIAN REFINING PARTNERSHIP
UNO-VEN COMPANY
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
SHELL OIL COMPANY
LAKETON RERNING INC
COUNTRYMARK COOPERATIVE INC
AMOCO OIL CO
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES INC
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
Production
BgrTels/Day
Average
See Notes 14 4
94.963
72,000
12,000
128,200
10.000
15.000
26.300
18.500
71.000
33,500
51,000
6,200
6,700
3.800
42.000
21.400
24.300
12,000
60.800
128.000
9,000
230.000
50.000
10.800
237.000
148,900
160.000
4.000
46,500
230,000
77,000
46,500
8,100
130,000
5,500
64,000
68:000
127.500
28.000
57.500
140,000
5.540
26.000
93.500
54.000
80.515
62,500
188.000
80,750
147.000
175.000
268,000
11.100
22.000
410,000
56.000
100,000
94.600
TRI Releases
1996- Total Pounds
Average
SeeNotel
484.894
276,546
NP
36,200
255
:NP
500
97,716
160,768
157,344
1,321.957
a
0
Inacf
4.351
>,648
8,555
toct
126,730
1,468.973
1.435
2.203.84C
5.672
116
759,906
1,075,668
1.198.262
Inact
NP
14.301
1,487,330
596,350
toct
tod
1.017.246
875
208.668
40.669
725.696
62.4SO
153,633
162,642
1.015
2T.99)1
29.957
282.250
174.635
132,660
146,518
toct
120.970
316,973
1.050.039
570
35.663
977.4S9
296.718
2,097,334
714.279
TRI Transfers
1996 -Total Pounds
Average
SeeNotel
156.801
21,700
NP
540
0
NP
0
1.905
2.051
0
8,005
0
0
Inact
75
1.092
0
toet
16,425
32.050
2,045
61.570
0
0
1.008.592
26,220
69.889
Inact
NP
75.570
123,677
49,960
toct
toct
529.746
465:
246.943
195.597
96.754
210,015
5.608
12,134
0
0
1,473
4.855
93,400
3.03S
40.238
toct
28.215
28.226
214,553
0
0
114,815
92.593
3,779
216.831
TRI Releases *
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ production unts
Average
See Notes 14 5
8.2
4.1
NC
6.3
00
NC
0.0
60
2.3
4.7
26.1
0.0
0.0
NC
01
O.S
0.4
:NC
2.4
11.9
04
9.9
01
00
7.5
7,4
79
MC
NC
1,8
70
ft.4
NC
NC
119
0.2
7.1
3.5
6.5
?.7
28
1,3
0.2
1.0
0.3
5.3
3.3
2.2
1.0
NC
1.0
2:0
47
0.1
1.6
27
7.0
21,0
98
TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
1996. Total Pounds
Averaoe
See Note 1
24,237
31,181
NP
6.050
255
NP
500
6,452
16,676
5,110
84,190
0
0
Inact
130
171*
0
toct
3.500
27,051
180
30.101
291
16
6,063
4,253
8,606
toet
NP
1.5BO
5.549
3,200
Inact
toct
8,641
90
2,750
1.937
2,665
10,900
6,267
33,900
505
1.30T
4.234
W.870
17,223
6,780
8,240
toct
15,600
28,391
139.604
0
5.427
13,341
28.778
87,568
43.931
TRI Releases *
Transfers -
Metals
1996 -Total Pounds
Average
SeeNotel
24.199
5,212
NP
0
0
NP
0
0
994
0
1.820
0
0
Inset
0
0
0
tod
14.390
11.148
0
47.305
0
0
108.039
7,929
64.947
tod
NP
9,024
133,081
41,050
had
tod
59.394
39.301
469
25.298
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23.321
tod
14.465
0
210.448
7
0
75,636
26,310
0
55,906
TRI Production -
Related Waste
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
SeeNotel
15.360.841
410,451
NP
S4.717
33
NP
228
99,008
196.262
157,344
2,356.562
0
0
(met
115,230
117,747
8,555
toct
5,253.136
27,478,864
52,665
3.384.030
169,050
m
2,974.214
18,436,016
1,067.069
Inart
NP
93,631
944.397.312
755,730
tod
toct
30.842.576
s,vta
1.345.462
23S.749
807,022
336^895
428,375
1.000
27JBW
3,343.342
434,347
267.923
20.40*,406
11.558,488
:toct
1.680,710
1066.417
13,581.152
586
35.929
9,441,656
16,303.384
2,105,1:16
4.981.660
PcJutant Spils
Spl Occurrence
Percent of
Facihties
642%
V
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
V
N
¥
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
¥
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
¥
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
¥
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
¥
Y
Y
Y
Y
ast 2 years)
tor Soils
Average
See Notes
8.1
1
6
2
4
8
1
15
15
1
3
10
7
12
3
10
2
29
29
2
8
t
1
3
.
9
2
7
4
12
13
8
7
2
3
23
1
37
6
Amourt Spiled (fcs)
Average
See Note?
17.392
t
16,518
42
16.758
982
568
6.811
47,781
1.365
84,150
22,294
61.Z1J
1.640
2.627
37.296
48.456
57.121
6,800
510
20,475
3,568
37.237
97,048
62
12,240
1,939
21,853
101.094
9,261
4,170
42.100
55,415
1,642
Surrounding
Population
Residents within 3
miles
Aven»
See Note 1
38.364
1,297
5.T19
6.723
6.723
36,69?
16.196
21,232
18.707
2.945:
1,044
29
4.323
14,140
63,700
40,459
59,455
25.514
34.081
60.410
36,113
171,230
165,516
34,709
6,012
62,660
44.180
271.539
15.035
23,590
191,037
307,638
221,611
169,472
176,103
136.216
169,792
41,644
42,658
5,717
18 659
21^052
5352
116,574
12,44?
9.033
5655
2/302
3,731
18,133
1.513
7,852
49,267
9,247
10,556
Note 1 Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2. Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncompliance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs In which facilities are considered to be in significant noncompliance. (maximum vahje=3)
Nc£ 5 ™s Men" is NOT cZ^ot £os! !±s£ '2°" T """V^u^i0," "T ^I0m0bi"> ASMmWy: """*»*•": Pu*> MIBs: short ">"*""* P*"*""" "««"»: barrels/day; Iron and Steel MHs: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Nrte 6 Averagt of mo«^nth atteaSh£!e I re ed calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 7 Average of those with a spin amount reported
NP = no permit/1 D« identified: NC = value not calculated; Inact = Inactive permit/in*
61
-------
Petroleum Refineries Location Data
Table A
Data puted on July 13,1998 from Integrated Data fcx Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
87
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
i»3
84
55
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
NAME
NATIONALCOOP REFINERY ABBN
ASHLAND OIL INC
SOMERSET REFINERY INC IL
EXXON CORPORATION
BP EXPLORATION SOILING
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
CANAL REFINING CO.
STAR ENTERPRISE
KERR-MCGEE REFINING CORP
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
TRANSAMERICA REFINING CO
VALERO REFINING COMPANY - LOUI
CALCASIEU REFINING CO,
CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
GOLD LINE REFINING LTD.
ARCADIA REFINING (FORMERLY DUB
MURPHY OIL USA INC
SHELL OIL COMPANY
PLACID REFINING CO
CALUMET LUBRICANTS CO L P.
PENNZOtt PRODUCING CO (ATLAS
ST. ROSE REFINING INC
CONOCO INC
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
KOCH REFINING COMPANY INC
ASHLANPOMNC
SOUTHLAND OIL COMPANY
CHEVRON USA INC
SOUTHLAND OIL COMPANY
BARRETT REFINING CORP
ERGON INC
CONOCO INC
EXXON CORPORATION
MONTANA REFINING CO,
CENEX INC
AMOCO OIL CO,
BAYWAY REFINING COMPANY (FORME
CITOO ASPHALT REFtNJNfi COMPANY
MOBIL OIL CO.
CHEVRON USA INC
AMERADA HESS (PORT READING) CO
COASTAL EAGLE POINT OH, CO
NAVAJO REFINING COMPANY
SLOOMFIELD REFINING COMPANY
GIANT INDUSTRIES ARIZONA INC
PETRO SOURCE REFIMNS PARTNBIS
ASHLAND OIL INC
BP EXPLORATION AND Olt INC
BP OIL CORP.
SUN COMPANY INC (R& Ml
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
CYRIL PETROCHEMICAL CORP.
CONOCO INC.
BARRETT REFINING CORP.
SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION
BUN COMPANY INC (R&M)
WYNNEWOOD REFINING COMPANY
STREET ADDRESS
2000 S. MAIN
PO BOX 1547. 600 WON
4045 SCENIC/BOX 551
AU.IANC R8F/H23 12MS
RIVER ROAD 6 89 APH
HWY 357
HWYS 70 S 44
GARYVILLE REF/HWY 61
H902«vwRo«d
PO BOX 453
TANK FARM RD
4401 LOUISIANA HIGHWAY 108
4646 OLD TOWN RD
CLAIBORNE REF/2.5MSE
2500 EST BERNARD HY
EAST SITE REFIN/H61W
1940 HWV 1 NORTH
HWY 157 2.5M N 1-20
3333 MIDWAY STREET
2210 OLD SPANISH TR
E SUPERIOR ST. PO BO
13DOSFORTST
12555 CLAYTON BLVD.
100W3ROAV6
HIGHWAY 11 NORTH
HWY 811.BAYOU CASOTT
HWY 11 NORTH
HARBOR PROJECT ROAD
401SZ3RDST
700 EXXON ROAD
1900 10TH STREET N£
US 21 2. SOUTH OF LAU
MANOAtt AVE 4: OLD RED
PO.BOX 222/1400 PA
4 PARADISE ROAWW.DE
BILLINGSPORT ROAD
12IIOSTATE:STRJEET;
750 CLIFF ROAD
ROUTE 130
PO BOX 81 70
1150SMETCALF5TREE
CEDAR POINT ROAD
WOODVILLERpAB
EOFI-35ON1STARD
2 W MAIN
1000 S PINE
5MIE.3MISOFTHOM
902 W25TH STREET
1700 S UNION STREET
906 S. POWELL
CITY
MC PHERSON
RUSSELL/CATLETTSBU
SOMERSET
BATON ROUGE
BELLE CHASSE
CHALMETTE
OHURCM POINT
CONVENT
COTTON VALLEY
GARYVILLE
N*»S«W
KROTZ SPRINGS
LAKE CHARLES
LAKE CHARLES
LAKE CHARLES
LISBON
MERAUX
NORCO
PORT ALLEN
PRINCETON
SHRSVETORT
ST. ROSE
WESTLAKE
ALMA
DETROIT
ROSEMOUNT
SAINT PAUL PARK
LUMBERTON
PASCAGOULA
SANDERSVILLE
V1CKSBURO
VICKSBURG
B9LUNGS
BILLINGS
GREAT FALLS
LAUREL
MANDAN
LINDEWBAYWAY
PAJULS8ORO
PAULSBORO
PERTH AMBOY
PORT READING
WESTMUE
ARTESIA
BLOOMFIELO
GALLUP
EAGLE SPRINGS
CANTON
LIMA
TOLEDO (OREGON)
TOLEDO/OREGON
ARDMORE
CYRIL
PONCACITY
THOMAS (CUSTES)
TULSA
TULSA
WYNNEWOOD
ST
KS
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA:
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
Ml
Ml
MN
MN
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MT
MT
MT
MT
NO
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NM
MM
NM
NV
OH
OH
OH
OH
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
EPA
RGN
07
04
-------
Petroleum Refineries Data Summary
Table B
Data pulled on July 13. 1996 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
jy
78
79
80
81
82
83
64
IS
66
87
88
69
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
NAME
NATIONAL COOP REFINERY ASSN
ASHLAND OIL INC
SOMERSET REFINERY INC IL
EXXON CORPORATION
BP EXPLORATION S OIL INC
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
CANAL REFINING CO
STAR ENTERPRISE
KERR-MCGEE REFINING CORP.
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
TRANSAMERICA REFINING CO.
VALERO REFINING COMPANY - LOUI
CALCASIEU REFINING CO:
CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
GOLD LINE REFINING LTD
ARCADIA REFINING (FORMERLY DUB
MURPHY OIL USA INC
SHELL OIL COMPANY
PLACID REFINING CO
CALUMET LUBRICANTS CO L.P.
PENNZOIL PRODUCING CO. (ATLAS
ST. ROSE REFINING INC.
CONOCO INC
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
KOCH REFINING COMPANY INC
ASHLAND OIL INC
SOUTHLAND OIL COMPANY
CHEVRON USA INC
SOUTHLAND OIL COMPANY
BARRETT REFINING CORP.
ERGON INC
CONOCO INC
EXXON CORPORATION
MONTANA REFINING CO.
CENEX INC
AMOCO OIL CO.
BAYWAY REFINING COMPANY (FORME
CITGO ASPHAtT REFINING COMPANY
MOBIL OIL CO
CHEVRON USA INC
AMERADA HESS (PORT READING) CO
COASTAL EAGLE POINT OIL CO.
NAVAJO REFINING COMPANY
BLOOMFIELD REFINING COMPANY
GIANT INDUSTRIES ARIZONA INC
PETRO SOURCE REFINING PARTNERS
ASHLAND OIL INC
BP EXPLORATION AND OIL INC
BP OIL CORP.
SUN COMPANY INC (RAM)
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
CYRIL PETROCHEMICAL CORP;
CONOCO INC
BARRETT REFINING CORP.
SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION
SUN COMPANY INC (R & M)
WYNNEWOOD REFINING COMPANY
Inspections (2 years)
Air
Total
Average
SMNote 1
3.5
3
6
2
1
4
1
3
3
1
1
3
5
3
2
3
2
4
2
2
2
3
2
2
5
0
1
1
3
1
NP
1
3
2
4
3
3
4
2
3
9
2
5
2
2
2
1
2
2
4
3
4
0
7
0
4
2
1
Water
Total
Average
SMNotel
22
0
6
3
2
2
4
0
2
2
2
2
3
2
4
2
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
NP
1
0
2
2
3
0
2
1
1
o
1
3
6
t
2
1
5
2
NP
a
NP
NP
3
4
2
0
1
0
2
NP
3
2
2
RCRA
Total
Average
See Note 1
2.6
10
1
4
6
S
3
1
2
1
2
S
1
1
6
6
1
S
2
0
2
0
5
4
1
5
1
2
8
2
1
0
6
4
4
4
9
5
0
1
4
5
4
3
3
2
1
1
5
4
2
3
0
5
0
4
3
2
Total
Average
SMNote 1
7.6
13
13
a
9
11
8
4
7
5
5
10
9
6
12
11
4
12
6
5
7
6
10
8
8
6
2
5
13
6
1
3
to
7
8
8
12
15
3
6
14
12
11
5
5
4
2
6
11
10
5
8
0
14
g
11
7
5
Historical Noncompiance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompiance
event)
Air
Average
SMNote 1
2.0
1
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
8
0
8
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
8
0
0
0
S
6
•s
0
5
3
e
0
0
8
8
8
8
0
0
1
0
5
4
0
water
Average
SMNotel
2.0
0
4
8
2
2
3
8
0
7
0
0
0
0
2
0
3
2
1
0
0
4
0
1
7
0
8
B
0
p
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
5
6
8
8
8
8
B
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
RCRA
Averege
SMNotel
37
2
8
8
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
a
4
8
8
4
0
0
0
5
8
0
8
7
4
0
4
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
8
0
2
8
0
0
0
1
0
0
A W R
Average
SMNote2
49
3
8
8
3
2
3
a
1
7
0
0
0
g
6
a
4
8
8
6
0
4
0
S
8
0
8
8
4
0
4
a
0
2
8
8
0
5
8
«
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
0
8
8
8
8
8
0
1
0
6
4
1
Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
• of
porutanls
overkmit
Average
SMNote 1
4.1
0
10
8
6
0
7
0
2
8
2
0
0
1
7
0
0
3
4
4
0
6
3
3
1
NP
2
2
2
1
1
Q
4
1
1
0
0
4
3
0
0
1
1
0
NP
0
NP
NP
3
7
9
g
1
n
5
NP
5
1
6
Note 1 Average Is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater
f of pollutants
regulated
SMNota i
259
b
25
2B
24
23
21
0
15
19
22
0
13
16
22
0
0
13
13
16
0
26
21
28
20
NP
17
15
13
15
15
0
13
15
16
14
23
16
86
5
21
23
19
18
NP
0
NP
NP
23
36
34
28
15
0
15
NP
13
12
29
tor reports
overitnrt
SMNote 1
11.2
0
44
16
16
D
16
0
5
20
4
0
0
t
12
0
0
3
6
24
0
15
4
8
14
NP
2
4
4
2
1
0
16
1
2
0
0
9
4
0
0
.1
1
e
NP
o
NP
NP
12
18
25
Q
0
8
NP
5
•(
t of reports
submlted
Average
SMNotoi
874.2
0
2,585
-3,832
568
754
1,470
(*
460
502
1,170
6
532
814
1,453
0
0
1,586
407
775
0
S20
386
1,521
528
NP
391
345:
299
877
345
0
827
307
445
296
374
843
2,967
699
925
838
1,518
NP
0
NP
393
91&
980
603
805
n
466
NP
368
275
Significant Noncompiance Indicator
Air
Percert of
Facilities
SMNote 1
36.3%
N
Y
y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
y
N
N
N
NP
N
N
Y
y
N
N
N
Y
N
..
(,
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
y
Y
y
Y
N
Y
y
Water
Percent of
Fecihtes
SMNotel
6.1%
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Kl
N
N
N
N
Y
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
ft)
N
NP
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
RCRA
Percent of
Fecitbes
SMNotel
12.3%
N
N
y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
U
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
M
A*W+R
Average
SMNote 3
0.5
0
1
2
1
0
1
0
0
6
0
4
0
5
0
1
1
0
0
Q
1
0
0
1
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
i
o
e
o
o
o
d
2
Q
0
1
1
2
i
J
1
1
1
1
Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years
Air
Average
SMNote 1
1.1
0
8
t
1
4
2
1
1
0
0
a
0
0
2
4
0
2
2
1
1
3
1
S
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
NP
0
o
o
5
0
0
4
3
12
7
4
r]
Q
Q
2
0
0
4
Q
2
0
0
1
water
SMNotel
0.3
0
4
a
0
g
1
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
NP
0
•f
1
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
o
D
0
0
1
Q
g
NP
NP
NP
rj
rj
0
0
NP
6
0
RCRA
Average
SMNote 1
03
a
0
2
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
o
0
o
1
o
Q
Q
Q
4
0
u
JO
0
1
0
fl
Total
Average
SMNote 1
1.6
0
12
J
2
8
3
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
3
4
1
3
2
2
1
4
1
6
2
0
2
i
2
0
1
0
0
o
o
5
o
o
5
2
13
(j
2
rj
0
1
c
2
1
0
1
Note 2 Average of number ot quarters with a violation or noncompiance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act. Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs In which faciltles are considered to be In significant noncompiance (maximum value=3)
Note t TNsiJSc'S is NOT cZa'raSe' a^s Int?" "H" I" """Vt _?£' "IT f™*"'^^ vehicles/year; Pulp Mils: short tons/day: Petroleum Refining: barrets/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short tons^ear: Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 6: A«rag1 oHhos?w«h attea* o£ spi"e^rted «l«*>led for each sector usmg onry those observations with nonzero values tor BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 7: Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP » no permit/ID* identified: NC = value not calculated; inact = inactive permit/ID*
63
-------
Petroleum Refineries Data Summary
Table C
D«t« pulled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
few*
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
to
«1
92
K
64
«
96
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
109
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
MAME
NATIONAL COOP REFINERY ASSN
ASHLAND OIL INC
SOMERSET REFINERY INC (Li
EXXON CORPORATION
BP EXPLORATION! Oil INC
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
CANAL REFINING CO-
STAR ENTERPRISE
KERR-MCGEE REFINING CORP.
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
TftANSAM ERICA REFINING CO.
VALERO REFINING COMPANY - LOUI
CALCASIEU REFINING CO
CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
GOtb LINE REFINING LTD
ARCADIA REFINING (FORMERLY DUB
MURPHY Oil USA INC
SHELL OIL COMPANY
PLACID REFINING CO.
CALUMET LUBRICANTS CO L.P.
PENNZOR. PRODUCING CO. (ATLAS
ST. ROSE REFINING INC
CONOCO INC
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
KOCH REFINING COMPANY INC
ASHLAND OIL INC
SOUTHLAND OIL COMPANY
CHEVRON USA INC!
SOUTHLAND OIL COMPANY
BARRETT REFINING CORP.
ERGON INC
CONOCO INC
EXXON CORPORATION
MONTANA REFINING CO.
CENEX INC
AMOCO OIL CO.
BAYWAY REFINING COMPANY (FORME
CITGO ASPHALT RHFIMNCJ COMPANY
MOBIL OIL CO.
CHEVRON USA INC
AMERADA HESS (PORT READING) CO
COASTAL EAGLE POINT OIL CO.:
NAVAJO REFINING COMPANY
BLOOMFIS.D REFINING COMPANY
GIANT INDUSTRIES ARIZONA INC
PETRO SOURCE REFINING PARTNER
ASHLAND OIL INC
8P EXPLORATION AND OIL INC
BP OIL CORP.
SUN COMPANY INC (fU M)
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
CYRIL PETROCHEMICAL CORP.
CONOCO INC.
BARRETT REFINING CORP
SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION
SUN COMPANY INC (R I M)
WYNNEWOOD REFINING COMPANY
Production
SaaNotasli*
94,963
75,600
213.400
5.500
424.000
231.500
170.000
9.500
225.000
7,800
255.000
60,000
12,500
305,000
27,600
7.350
100,000
215.000
48.600
6.200
46.200
40.000
181,900
45,600
70,000
230.000
67.100
5,800
295.000
11.000
8.000
23.000
49,500
44,000
7,000
41,450
58,000
215.000
40.000
126.000
80,000
58,000
125,000
57.000
16,600
20.800
•7.000
66,000
161,000
136,000
125.000
68.000
T.SOO
140,000
10.500
54,000
85,000
52.000
TRI Releases
1996- Total Pounds
A*araga
SM Natal
484.694
982.439
503,637
30,135
3.073.470
354.727
580,032
*,31»
714,064
7,525
162,503
0
318,817
48.073
2,277,404
62,819
toad
385,318
2.208.232
27.S43
18,326
7BS,*6Z
33.555
581625
102,475
121,138
823.727
295,405
0
3,781.190
4,650
meet
428.600
101,574
210,477
93,530
143,925
34S.KT
2.077,325
2.17
126,033
29,931
215,259
266,077
145.406
96.194
650,155
IrtKl
132,386
243,600
183.275
61,508
359.906
HP
265.645
NP
307,112
402,722
Inact
TRI Transfers
1996 -Total Pounds
Avanoa
SaeNotel
156,801
14,187
142.459
1.015
25.798
97.715
5.542
75.4JS
68,105
0
200,906
6
17.833
21
166.120
0
tract
1,283
606.750
675
0
103,314
0
383,f74
35,643
140,583
325,256
23.600
0
742,408
0
tract
0
16,419
17,458
3.630
3.275
1.333
71,132
40
49,055
18,970
9.345
119.365
9.000
8.874
0
Inact
57.215
97,521
111.172
1 •13,798
26,873
NP
141,455
NP
47,903
7,211
Inad
TRI Releases *
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ production units
«•»«»
SaaNotas US
8.2
1J.2
30
&.r
7.3
ZO
3.4
6.9
35
1,0
1.4
0.0
56
3.9
80
2.3
NC
J.7
13.1
0.6
2.2
18.8
0.8
*.1
30
3,7
5.0
4.8
0.0
15.3
0.4
NC
18.6
2,4
5.2
13-9
36
6.0
10.0
0.0
1.4
06
3.9
3.1
27
6.3
31.3
NC
29
2,1
22
1.6
5.7
NC
2.9
NC
6.6
4.8
NC
TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
1996 - totat Pounds
Avaraga
Saa Natal
24,237
44,103
112.087
2.905
48.806
38.018
31,842
4,596
5,047
824
7,178
0
11,165
12.185
107.022
9.436
Inact
9,040
142,938
5,003
0
6.500
1,261
32.106
2.930
9,296
24.410
44.793
0
72.245
1,250
Inact
0
12,645
22,831
3.630
8,325
21,240
28.576
217
15.109
3,555
516
33,912
13.490
14.755
58,312
Inact
28,133
26,000
10,436
11.182
19.662
HP
17,181
NP
13,739
9,831
Inact
TRI Releases »
Transfers -
Metals
1996 -Total Pounds
Awega
SeaNota 1
24.199
0
51,384
0
15.198
29.799
1,244
0
29,070
O
26.478
«
0
0
73
0
Inact
0
11.953
0
0
0
0
134,672
1.843
9,030
272.484
473
0
704,565
0
Inact
0
0
15,549
«
0
?as
67.688
0
17.255
0
11,610
19.295
0
0
0
Inact
3.871
28,000
93.273
44,690
13,733
NP
53,510
NP
1,662
3,918
Inact
TRI Production -
Related Waste
1996 -Total Pounds
«»rag.
SaaNota 1
15.360.841
20,797,168
14,317.504
29,135
4,643,924
59.732.832
5.800,184
M1S
3.171,730
7,528
1.220.054
fl
1,462.879
49,977
56,948.224
23,7*8
Iract
3,031,770
83.346,496
2*4,912
23,416
3.177,090
129,190
1.259,929
18,760,912
32,834,624
1.356,771
2.658,582
0
16.759.4M
9,810
mast
412.000
203,791
2,395,610
3*2,331
2.245,050
1.624,787
2.203.066
1.099
129.881.984
121,857
296,308
201.248,768
35.279.424
116.533
1,394,185
Inact
387,429
7,970,756
19,081.808
1.597.554
56,742,176
NP
534,791
NP
353,486
782,973
Inact
Potutant Spills last 2 years)
Soil occurranca
Parcaot ol
Facitbas
642%
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
¥
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
* ol Soils
A--W
SaaNola6
8.1
6
10
1
1
5
29
1
5
9
t
1
14
1
3
3
2
3
4
14.
5
1
1
2
1
24
1
r
5
i
2
13
1
8
1
2
Anwunt Spiled (t«J
-------
Petroleum Refineries Location Data
Table A
Data puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated Data lor Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
1S7
138
133
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
1S1
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
168
170
171
172
173
174
NAME
CHEVRON U;S,A: INC. :
W1TCO CORPORATION
PETROWAX PENNSYLVANIA INC
BAYWAY REFINING
SUN COMPANY INC
SUN COMPANY INC (R « M)
PENNZOt PRODUCTS COMPANY
UNITED REFINING INC
PHILLIPS PR CORE INC.
CARIBBEAN PETROLEUM REFINING L
SUN CO INC.
MAPCO PETROLEUM INC.
PRIDE COMPANIES LP
EXXON CORPORATION
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
FINA OIL AND CHEMICAL COMPANY
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY! :
HOWELL HYDROCARBONS & CHEM. IN
CITGO REFINING AND CHEMICALS
COASTAL REFINING 8. MARKETING
KOCH REFINING COMPANY INC
NESTE TRIFINERY PETRO SERVE (F
SOUTHWESTERN:REFININGeo:iNC.
VALERO REFINING COMPANY
DEER PARK REFG ITB PARTNERSHIP
REFINERY HOLDING COMPANY. L.P
LYONDEU-CITGO REFINING CO LLC
PHIBRO ENERGY USA. INC
PETROLITE CORPORATION
SHELL ODESSA REFINING COMPANY
CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM <5ORP
CHEVRON USA INC
FINA OIL AND CHEMICAL COMPANY
STAR ENTERPRISE
AGE REFINING «. MARKETING
SOUTH HAMPTON REFINING CO
DIAMOND SHAMROCK REF MKTG CO
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
PHIBRO SSKSf USA INC!
DIAMOND SHAMROCK REF MKTG CO
LA GLORIA OIL* GAS CO
BIG WEST OIL COMPANY
AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY
CHEVRON USA INC
CRYSEN R£FINWG )NC
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
AMERADA HESS CORP.
SHELL ANACORTES REFINING COMPA
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY
TOSCO REFINING CO.. FERNDALE R
CHEVRON USA INC
SOUND REFINING INC.
U SOU, REFINING CO
MURPHY OIL USA INC
STREET ADDRESS
550.1 INW FRONT AVE ': : ' ': • '
77 N KENDALL AVE
4401 POST RD.
PO BOX 428
3144 PASSYUNK AVENUE
J MAM ST.
P.O. BOX 780
ROAD 710 KM 13 BO.
ROAD 28. KM 2 . LUCHETTI INDUS
ROUTE 901 KM 2 8 (P
PO BOX 2930
ONU.S,277!MI,N,
2800 DECKER DRIVE
END OP BUHT STREET
INTERSTATE 20 HWY E
NORTH SHJE OF PtflLU
1201 SOUTH SHELDON R
LAWRENCE DRIVE
1300 CANTWELL LANE
SUNTIDE AND UP RIVER
6600 UP RIVER ROAD
ttOONUEceSBAYBOUL
5900 UP RIVER ROAD
STATE HWY, 225
6500 TROWBRIDGE
12000 LAWNOALE
9701 MANCHESTER
AT THE INTERSECTION
2700 S. GRANDVIEW
1U RED BLWF ROAD
GULF OIL CORPORATION
PORT ARTHUR REFINERY
NORTH END HOUSTON AV
7811 S. PRESA
FM 418 WEST
FM119 AT FM12M BETW
HWY 35 AND 524 AT OL
FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH
10TH ST SOUTH
LOOP 197 SOUTH B14T
301 LEROY STREET
1702 EAST COMMERCE
474 W SOON
2551 N. 1100W.
2355 S. 1100 Vi.
393 S. BOO W
RT1730MIEOFRT
P.O BOX 127/ESTATE
WEST MARCH POINT ROAO
20555 RICHMOND BEACH
2628 MARINE VIEW DR
3001 MARSHALL AVE
24TH AVE E AND 26TH
CITY
PORTLAND (WltBRIOGE) ! :: •; :
BRADFORD
FARMER'SVALIEY
TRAINER
MARCUS HOOK
PHILADELPHIA
ROUSEVtLLE
WARREN
GUAYAMA
BAYAMON
YABUCOA
MEMPHIS
ABILENE
BAYTOWN
BEAUMONT
BIG SPRING
BORGER
CHANNELVIEW
CORPUS CHRISTI
CORPUS CHRISTI
CORPBSCHRIST1
CORPUS CHRISTI
CORPUS CHRISTI
CORPUS CHRISTI
DEEFPARK
EL PASO
HOUSTON
HOUSTON
K1LGORE
ODESSA
PASADENA
PORT ARTHUR
PORT ARTHUR
PORT ARTHUR/NECHES
SAN ANTONIO
SILSBEE
SUNRAY(MCKEE)
SWEENY
TEXAS CITY
TEXAS CITY
TEXAS CITY
THREE RIVERS
TYLER
BRIGHAM CITY
SALT LAKE CITY
SALT LAKE CITY
WOODS CROSS
WOODS CROSS
YDBKTOWN
ST. CROIX
ANACORTgS
ANACORTES
BLAINE
FERNDALE
RICHMOND BEACH
TACOMA
TACOMA
SUPERIOR
ST
OH
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PR
PR
PR
TN
TX
TX
TX :
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
UT
Ut
UT
UT
UT
VA
VI
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
Wl
EPA
RGN
10
03
03
03
US
03
OS
03
02
02
02
04
06
06
06
06
IX
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
OS
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
OS
06
OB
06
06
08
08
08
oa
08
03
02
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
OS
65
-------
Petroleum Refineries Data Summary
Table B
Oala puled on July 1 3. 1 998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
12?
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
iS7
158
159
160
151
162
163
164
165
tss
16?
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
NAME
CHEVRON U.SA INC.
WITCO CORPORATION
PETROWAX PENNSYLVANIA INC:
BAYWAY REFINING
SUN COMPANY INC
SUN COMPANY INC (R 8, M)
PENNZOIL PRODUCTS COMPANY
UNITED REFINING INC
PHILLIPS PR CORE INC.
CARIBBEAN PETROLEUM REFINING L
SUN CO. WC.
MAPCO PETROLEUM INC
PRIDE COMPANIES LP
EXXON CORPORATION
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
FINA OIL AND CHEMICAL COMPANY
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
HOWELL HYDROCARBONS 1 CHEM IN
CITGO REFINING AND CHEMICALS
COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING
KOCH REFINING COMPANY IMC
NESTE TRIFINERY PETRO SERVE (F
SOUTHWESTERN REFINING CO INC
VALERO REFINING COMPANY
DEER PARK REFG LTD PARTNERSHIP
REFINERY HOLDING COMPANY. L.P.
LYONOELL-CITGO REFINING CO LLC
PHIBRO ENERGY USA INC
PETROLITE CORPORATIDN
SHELL ODESSA REFINING COMPANY
CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORP
CHEVRON USA INC
FINA OIL AMD CHEMICAL COMPANY
STAR ENTERPRISE
ASS REFINING « MARKETING
SOUTH HAMPTON REFINING CO.
DIAMOND SHAMROCK REF WKTC3 CO
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
PHIBRO ENERGY USA INC
DIAMOND SHAMROCK REF MKTG CO
LA GLORIA OIL «. GAS CO
BIG WEST OIL COMPANY
AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY
CHEVRON USA INC
CRYSEN REFINING INC
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
AMERADA HESS CORP
SHELL AN*COfiT£S RERNING COMPA;
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY;
TOSCO REFINING CO.. FERNDALE R
CHEVRON USA INC.
SOUND REFINING INC.
US OIL «, REFINING CO
MURPHY OIL USA INC
nspectJons (2 years)
Air
Total
See Note 1
35
:0
6
4
5
!1
6
3
7
10
3
5
1
1
5
3
3
1
1
5
1
1
1
2
2
1
3
2
3
0
2
3
2
1
2
i
1
2
2
1
3
5
1
1
12
15
15
10
9
3
3
3
2
5
1
NP
NP
1
4
Water
Total
Avafeqe
See Note 1
2.2
0
9
5
4
4
7
5
13
1
1
1
1
NP
2
NP
0
0
1
D
1
1
1
1
1
2
NP
1
3
NP
0
2
3
2
1
1
1
NP
0
D
1
0
0
3
4
5
2
4
3
NP
4
4
0
RCRA
Total
A**rBoa
See Natal
26
0
2
1
1
3
6
1
3
2
3
2
1
0
0
3
1
2
1
10
6
2
3
4
3
1
1
0
1
0
1
2
3
1
3
0
1
9
2
0
1
0
1
5
2
2
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
Total
A>araga
SMNota 1
7.6
0
13
16
10
H
19
9
23
13
7
8
3
1
7
6
4
3
3
15
8
4
5
7
6
4
4
3
7
0
3
7
8
4
6
:4
3
ft
5
2
6
7
9
3
12
16
19
10
10
11
9
to
6
11
5
0
4
5
4
Historical Noncompiance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncomplance
event)
Air
Avaraae
See Note 1
20
0
0
0
8
6
4
0
8
1
0
s
3
0
8
0
1
0
0
1
5
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
3
1
0
8
0
0
S
0
8
0
1
1
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
wataf
**t*x
See Note 1
20
0
2
0
1
0
8
3
0
1
0
1
3
0
3
1
1
0
0
0
.4
0
a
1
0
0
0
0
\
0
a
2
0
1
6
3
3
1
1
a
a
4
0
0
8
8
1
4
2
4
0
2
1
0
RCRA
farm
See Note 1
3.7
0
0
0
0
e
8
0
7
8
e
e
6
8
8
0
t
8
0
8
8
3
2
0
0
5
4
1
8
0
8
8
8
0
8
6
7
8
8
a
0
0
8
1
8
8
8
0
0
8
8
0
4
0
0
0
2
0
0
A W R
A^rege
See Note 1
4.9
0
2
6
8
8
8
3
a
8
e
t
a
a
a
0
a
8
0
a
8
3
2
0
0
7
4
t
t
0
a
a
8
»
a
t
i
t
a
a
3
»
a
2
6
8
a
0
4
8
8
•(
e
2
4
0
3
1
0
Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
• of
polutarts
ovarlrmt
*»»•«»
Saa Not* 1
4.1
0
5
4
9
1
9
3
6
a
14
6
7
NP
0
NP
3
6
0
2
1
2
0
3
2
3
NP
1
6
;NP
0
3
2
1
3
0
2
NP
6
4
6
8
2
2
0
2
2
0
0
2
10
1
3
2
1
NP
0
0
3
• otpoajterts
rajMatW
A»-M.
259
0
16
10
25
26
30
13
16
38
32
33
20
NP
17
NP
20
84
7
22
23
19
0
13
22
22
NP
4
25
NP
0
3
31
24
13
0
11
NP
14
22
17
23
19
a
0
13
13
0
0
14
19
13
14
14
14
NP
6
11
56
«« reports
ovar hmt
A»r«e
See Note 1
11.2
0
20
4
18
5
20
5
20
22
154
13
27
NP
0
NP
16
17
0
3
1
2
0
4
6
10
NP
1
14
NP
0
7
4
2
5
e
3
NP
34
1
15
19
3
9
0
4
3
0
0
3
15
7
6
2
2
NP
0
0
3
*o( reports
subnled
A«w
SaaNotal
874.2
0
499
347
1,020
2,535
1,949
1,161
1,935
1,403
1,219
2.001
1.185
NP
476
NP
533
97J
104
413
630
7«2
0
414
698
961
NP
tti
886
NP
0
207
580
1,276
1,431
0
437
NP
598
431
929
6S8
472
276
0
50
263
0
0
536:
1,110
460
483
479
582
t*>
132
345
1,885
Significant NoncomplBnce Indicator
Air
Percent of
FKlMlfS
SaaNotal
36.3*
N
N
N
Y
y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
¥
Y
y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
NP
N
Y
Water
Percent of
Facil&as
SaaNola 1
61%
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
NP
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W>
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
W
N
N
N
RCRA
Percent ol
Faci»es
SaaNota 1
12.3*
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
y
N
N
N
y
N
y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
A+W'R
Awerage
0.5
0
0
6
1
!
0
0
1
1
2
6
0
1
1
1
0
2
0
2
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
a
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
2
i
1
0
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
o
0
1
Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years
A
-------
Petroleum Refineries Data Summary
Table C
Data puled on July 1 3. 1 996 from Negated
Data lor Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
117
118
119
120
1Z1
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
181
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
NAME
CHEVRON U.S.A: INC,
W1TCO CORPORATION
PETKOWAX PENNSYLVANIA INC.
BAYWAY REFINING
BUN COMPANY WC
SUN COMPANY INC (R * M)
PENNZOfl. PRODUCTS COMPANY
UNITED REFINING INC
PHILLIPS PR CORE IMC.
CARIBBEAN PETROLEUM REFINING L
SUN CO. INC:
MAPCO PETROLEUM INC
PRIDE COMPANEBLP
EXXON CORPORATION
MOBIL OB, CORPORATION
FINA OIL AND CHEMICAL COMPANY
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
HOWELL HYDROCARBONS 4 CHEM IN
CITGO REFINING AND CHEMICALS:
COASTAL REFINING «. MARKETING
KOCH REFINING COMPANY INC
NESTE TRIFINERY PETRO SERVE (F
SOUTHWESTERN REFINING CO INC.
VALERO REFINING COMPANY
DEER PARK REFG LTD PARTNERSHIP
REFINERY HOLDING COMPANY, L P
LYONDELL-CITGO REFINING CO LLC
PHIBRO ENERGY USA INC
PETROUTE CORPORATION
SHELL ODESSA REFINING COMPANY
CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORP
CHEVRON USA INC
FINA OIL AND CHEMICAL COMPANY
STAR ENTERPRISE
AGE REFINING 1 MARKETING
SOUTH HAMPTON REFINING CO.
DIAMOND SHAMROCK REF MKTG CO
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
PHIBRO ENERGY USA tNC
DIAMOND SHAMROCK REF MKTG CO
LA GLORIA OIL 4 GAS CO
BIG WEST OIL COMPANY
AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY
CHEVRON USA INC
CRYSEN REFINING INC
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
AMERADA HESS CORP.
SHELL ANACORTES R6MNINO COMPA
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
ATLANTIC RJCHFIE1D COMPANY
TOSCO REFINING CO . FERNDALE R
CHEVRON USA JNC,
SOUND REFINING INC.
US OIL 1 REFINING CO
MURPHY OIL USA INC
Production
Barra&Qay
Avaraga
Saa Notes 144
94.963
18,000
10.000
172.000
175.BQO
315.000
25,000
60.000
45.000
85.000
89.000
4Z758
396.000
315.000
55.000
215,000
1.400
130.000
95.000
255.000
27.000
104.000
106,745
215,400
87.000
265.000
71.000
1.000
28.600
100.000
185,000
175,000
235,000
6,006
2.000
132.000
301.000
433,900
70.000
123,500
75.000
55,000
24.000
44:000
45.000
1*500
25,000
53,000
495,000
106,200
136,000
189,000
95,000
11,900
32,400
33,200
TRI Releases
199C- Total Pounds
A*raoa
SaaNota 1
484.894
65,934
182.320
ssr.ur
1.374
289.359
412.797
«S,69«
218,600
652,652
439.989
tract
49,575
159.WO
1.540.930
3.631,652
703,440
2,350,212
4.149
431.018
1.053.192
29.247
NP
21J.721
241,112
2,481,742
50,064
M8.112
769,843
Inacf.
199.148
57S.972
2.782
268,000
617,024
5,542
9,335
674£75
685,461
5,715,828
200.890
491,029
1,165.718
62,540
43.266
132.421
48.335
1S,t56
50.089
323,848
1.506,131
275,558
126,545
248.177
185,752
2«,,616
NP
81,782
82.676
TRI Transfers
1996 - ToM Pounds
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
156.801
1,618
0
6
93
342.897
263.766
28.103
27,867
14,060
0
hact
167,248
15,095
206,979
35,698
16
S
539,915
447,666
146.652
7.065
NP
4,704
307.958
11,289,080
41,887
6B7.82T
21,495
fnact
3.020
260.060
0
1,444
50
0
755
208
264.553
237,356
356
61,381
979.575
500
2.386
106,2«3
3.185
8.3*0
49,993
432
479,211
17,247
152,296
77,280
0
0
NP
20
1 531
TRI Releases +
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ production units
Av«raga
SaaNotasUS
8.2
3,8
182
ftt
00
3,6
22
37.*
4.1
MC
98
NC
24
4.1
4.4
11.6
128
10,9
3886
6.8
12.6
0,1
NC
21
5.1
63,8
1.1
6.3
11.2
NC
7.1
M
0.0
1,5
2.6
09
5.1
5,1
32
1*6
29
4,5
28.6
1.5
1.9
5.5
1.1
1.9
4.0
SI
40
2:7
21
1,7
20
NC
NC
1,9
2.5
TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
1996 - Total Pounds
Avaraga
SMNota 1
24.237
6,534
320
0
0
22.787
61,599
7,00?
8,850
60,481
32.489
tract
6.205
W.360
93,622
80,12*
93,215
100,921
795
21.362
79,621
6
NP
22,152
9,619
194,358
10,457
58.318
43,866
Fnact
13,400
21,161
5
62,033
4,694
310
500
28.160
62,100
338.004
48,034
26,502
47,787
30,460
5,010
8.918
5,160
630
6,702
18,284
100,137
21.W
5,763
24.003
10,583
2,831
NP
9,120
1,762
TRI Releases »
Transfers -
Metals
1996 -Total Pounds
Avaraoa
SaaNota 1
24.199
0
0
«
0
49:264
51,183
0
0
0
0
irad
0
0
245.665
10.127
0
23,953
0
43.189
36,782
0
NP
0
59.064
28,234
0
2,314
967
inad
0
0
17
It
0
0
0
0
271,610
180.439
12
9,3«5
2.066
750
0
0
0
0
0
0
114.881
24,653
0
79;1D2
3.718
0
NP
0
0
TRI Production -
Related Waste
1996 - Total Pounds
Awaoa
SaaNotal
15.360.841
67,853
182,320
663,18?
5.482
4.432,028
2,629.350
2.104.872
1,165,600
1 ,341,676
245,243
tract
28,506.160
192.305
2.489.978
tt.S29.176
703,381
2,397,402
543,369
878,168
16,043.872
38.204
NP
369:676
17.044.320
58,662,680
367.289
1,724,178
4,314.644
(nacf
200,644
860,032
111,115
4,401(176
617.117
5,776
7.080
62,2J4iZ72
117.439,872
12.071,272
4.048.894
1,919,336
2,648.296
Z1.324.W2
26,064,608
2,142.936
72,719.296
192.163
325/55
3,291,8K>
12.944.992
1,592,725
5,787,444
3,907.206
5,665,532
2ft,618
NP
61,7«
84,225
Pollutant Soils
Slxl Occurrence
Parcant ot
Faciltoas
64.2%
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
¥
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
¥
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
K
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
tost 2 years!
• of SPH
ftnraga
SeeNotee
8.1
1
1
2
9
1
2
1
1
5
23
1
37
22
1
2
2
25
7
3
52
9
5
14
81
3
5
31
8
6
7
9
16
4
9
3
5
1
Amount SpMad (bs)
A«araga
SaaNota 7
17.392
882
14,700
1.519
3,503
4
2.965
8,971
17
3.213
:1 60,917
420
146
13
16,094
3.839
14,994
188,547
33,560
4.752
51,866
2,275
58.275
6,276
686
1,880
1,006
31,762
4
1,239
7
13,943
350
Surrounding
Population
Residents wthin 3
milas
Av«rag«
SaaNota 1
38.364
82,679
11,874
806
55.669
48.727
100.119
tt.622
12,902
44.956
39,266
33,124
1,760
7,198
35.494
45.913
35,665
4.728
6.433
49,879
6.249
31,054
82,610
66.ru
89,667
11,939
7,982
68,959
7,883
t9,843
8,315
73.500
3.501
1,615
34,489
29,436
25,815
1.554
40,469
25.356
62.980
25,060
42,199
52,756
66,086
4.533
3,191
2.344
1,266
46,92$
39,722
47,971
Note 1: Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2: Average of number of Quarters with a violation or noncompiance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs in wtich faciltles are considered to be In significant noncompf ance (maximum value=3)
Note 5 Tnls iScata !s NOT cZarlS. '.rro«« intT "H"" I* ""'."t T??'.' "^ ^^^^ ******* «**«*««•. P* Mite short tonsAfcy; Pelroleun, Refining: batTels/day, Iron and Steel Mills, short tons/yea,; Nonferrous Metals metric tons/year
Note 5 rrvs indtcatoris NOT companible across industry sectors. Average is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
pioie o. average 01 tnose with at least one spin reported.
Note 7: Average of those with > spil amount reported
NP = no permit/ID* identified; NC = value not calculated; Inad = inactive permit/ID*
67
-------
Petroleum Refineries Location Data
Table A
Dili pulled on July 13.1998 from Integrated Data (or Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
175
176
177
178
•:;:;i«
NAME
QUAKER STATE .CORPORATION
FRONTIER REFINING INC
iittf i.S AMERICA REFINING CO
WYOMING REFINING CO
SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION
STREET ADDRESS
P.O. BOX 336, STATE
2700 EAST 5TH STREET
PQ BOX 510
740 W MAIN STREET
100 SASTUNCOLN HIGHWAY
CITY
NEWEL).
CHEYENNE
EVANSVIUBCASPES
NEWCASTLE
SINCLAIR
ST
WV
WY
WY
WY
WY
EPA
RGN
03
08
08
08
08
-------
Petroleum Refineries Data Summary
Table B
DKa puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
175
176
m
176
179
NAME
QUAKER STAti CORPORATION
FRONTIER REFINING INC
ante AMEWCA aeemmaco:
WYOMING REFINING CO
SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION
Inspections (2 years)
Air
TOM
Avjraga
SaaNotel
3.5
3
7
4
5
3
Water
Total
Avaraga
SaeNotel
22
2
4
NP
1
1
RCRA
Total
Ay.**
SMMe 1
26
24
7
4
2
4
Total
Averaga
SaaNote 1
7.6
29
19
7
9
9
Historical Noncomplance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompNance
event)
Air
Avaraga
SaeNotal
2.0
8
5
8
0
0
Water
Average
See Note 1
20
9
3
a
4
g
RCRA
Averaae
See Note 1
3.7
8
0
1
B
8
A W R
Average
SaaNot«2
49
8
5
8
8
«
Permit Breeedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
*of
polutants
over Nmit
Average
SaaNota t
4.1
s
5
NP
1
0
* of poftjtarts
related
Average
See Note 1
25.9
24
15
NP
12
0
f of reports
OVerlmrt
Average
SaaNotal
11.2
34
7
NP
2
g
* of reports
submHad
Avaraga
SaaNotal
974.2
924
901
HP
105
0
Significant Noncompliance Indicator
*r
Percart ot
Facikbas
SaaNotal
36.3%
Y
Y
N
N
N
Watar
Pareant of
Facilitias
SaaNota 1
61%
Y
N
t»
N
N
RCRA
Pafcant of
Facitbas
SaaNota 1
12.314
N
N
N
N
N
A'W'R
Avaraga
SaaNota3
0.5
2
1
a
0
0
Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years
Air
A>ar>ga
SaaNota 1
1.1
2
3
a
0
0
Watar
A»rao»
SaaNota 1
0.3
0
0
NP
0
a
RCRA
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
0.3
2
0
0
0
0
Total
A*ar«.
SaaNota t
1.6
4
3
0
0
0
Note 1 Average is calctrtted across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2 Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomptance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3 Average number of programs in which facilties are considered to be In significant noncomplance. (maximum vslue=3)
Note 4 This indicator is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector Automobile Assembly: vehidestyear; Pulp Mils: short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note S. This indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors. Average is calculated for etch sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 6: Average of those with al least one spil reported.
Note 7 Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID* identified; NC = value not calculated; Inact = inactive permit/ID.*
69
-------
Petroleum Refineries Data Summary
Table C
Oala puled on July 1 3, 1 998 from Integrated
Data (or Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
175
176
177
178
179
NAME
QUAKER STATE CORPORATION : :
FRONTIER REFINING INC
LITTLE AMERICA REF ININO CO i i i :
WYOMING REFINING CO
SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION ':': :':':.
Production
Banals/Day
SaaNotas 114
94.963
.:.;;;;;;;:;:iijjoo
38,670
: : : J4.SOO
12.555
:::::: :54soo
TRI Releases
1996 -Tow Pounds
Avarega
SaaNota 1
484.894
::::;:::':;:i»'iiB5
171,765
• 18*534
94.460
::::::::::: 246.883
TRI Transfers
1996- Tow Pounds
Awaga
SaaNota 1
156,801
500
20,935
7.402
40
0
TRI Releases +
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ production umts
Avaraga
Saa Notes 1* 5
8.2
1S9
5.0
7.8
7.5
4,6
TRI Releases-
Carcinogens
1996 - ToW Pounds
Avwoga
SaaNota 1
24,237
838
21,917
13,706
1.440
T4.Z49
TRI Releases +
Transfers -
Metals
1996 - Total Pounds
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
24.199
750
0
IB
0
0
TRI Production -
Related Waste
1996 - Total Pounds
Avaraga
SeaNota 1
15.360.841
80J.244
1,591,180
806,416
168.484
1.006.139
Pdutant Spills
Soil Occurrence
Pafcant ot
Faciltas
64.2%
V
N
N
Y
¥
last 2 years)
ff of Soils
Averaoa
Saa Notao
8.1
1
1
8
Amount Salad (tjs)
Avaraga
SaaNota7
17.392
167
35
10.890
Surrounding
Population
Rasidants mlhn 3
mtos
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
38.364
19,934
45.322
24.204
2,940
528
Note 1 Average Is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2: Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs In which facllties are considered to be in significant noncomplance. (maximum value=3)
Note 4: This indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector: Automobile Assembly: veNdes/year, Pulp Mils: short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mills: short tons/year; Nonferraus Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5: This Indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors. Average Is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 6 Average of those with at least one soil reported.
Note 7: Average of those with a spll amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID* Identified: NC = value not calculated: Inlet = Inactive permit/ID*
-------
Integrated Iron and Steel Mills Location Data
Table A
Data pulled on July 13, 1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NAME
USX CORP
GULF STATES STEEL, INC
NATIONAL STEEL CORP.
ACME STEEL CO.
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP
INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES
LTV STEEL CO INC
USX CORP
AK STEEL CORP
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP
ROUGE STEEL CO.
NATIONAL STEEL CORP
MCLOUTH STEEL
LTV STEEL CO INC.
USS/KOBE STEEL CO.
AK STEEL CORP.
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP
WCt STEEL, INC
YOUNGSTOWN SINTER CO
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORP.
USX CORP
GENEVA STEEL
WEIRTON STEEL CORP,
STREET ADDRESS
5700 VALLEY ROAD
174 SOUTH 26TH ST.
2QTH AND STATE ST8.
13500S. PERRY AVE.
US RTE 12 AND ST. HWY 1
3210WATLINGST
3001 DICKEY ROAD
ONE NORTH BROADWAY
PO BOX 191
5111 N POINT BLVD.
3001 MILLER RD.
NO. 1 QUALITY DR
1491 WEST JEFFERSON
3100 E. 45TH STREET
1807 EAST 28TH ST.
1801 CRAWFORD ST.
MCLtSTER AVE
SOUTH 3RD ST.
1040 PINE AVE. SE
251 DIVISION ST.
701 EAST 3RD ST
13TH ST. ANDBRADDOCKAVE.
1 600 W CENTER
400 THREE SPRINGS DR.
CITY
FAIRRELD
GADSDEN
GRANITE CITY
RIVERDALE
BURNS HARBOR
EAST CHICAGO
EAST CHICAGO
GARY
ASHLAND
SPARROWS POINT
DEARBORN
ECORSE
TRENTON
CLEVELAND
LORAIN
MIDDLETOWN
MINGO JUNCTION
STEUBENVILLE
WARREN
YOUNGSTOWN
BETHLEHEM
BRACKENRIDGE
BRADDOCK
OREM
WBRTON
ST
At
AL
IL
IL
IN
IN
IN
IN
KY
MD
Mt
Ml
Mf
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
PA
PA
PA
UT
WV
EPA
RGN
04
04
05
05
05
05
05
05
04
03
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
03
03
03
08
03
71
-------
Integrated Iron and Steel Mills Data Summary
Table B
Dili puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
4
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NAME
USXCORP
GULF STATES STEEL, INC.
NATIONAL STEEL CORP.
ACME STEEL CO
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP.
INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES
LTV STEEL CO; INC
USXCORP
AKSTESLCORP.
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP.
ROUGE STEEL CO
NATIONAL STEEL CORP
MCLOUTH STEEL
LTV STEEL CO. INC
USS/KOBE STEEL CO.
AK STEEL CORP
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP
WCI STEEL, INC.
YOUNGSTOWN SINTER CO
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP.
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORP.
USXCORP
GENEVA STEEL
WElRTON STEEL CORP.
Inspections (2 years)
Air
TOM
Avaraoa
SMNota 1
14.3
12
NP
28
6
IS
12
10
18
3
77
4
16
1
0
a
6
1
0
1
NP
6
8
10
50
»
Water
TOM
Avaraga
SaaNota!
48
6
1
5
2
10
9
9
17
7
7
2
17
1
4
2
2
1
2
1
NP
3
3
2
0
2
RCRA
Total
Avaraga
SMNota 1
46
22
17
0
1
4
7
3
8
4
3
0
0
4
4
5
3
0
1
2
0
r
1
1
0
17
Total
Avaraga
SMNotal
21.2
39
18
33
9
29
28
22
43
14
87
6
33
6
g
15
11
3
3
4
0
16
12
«
50
2?
Historical NoncompKance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompiance
event)
Air
Avaraga
SMNote 1
4.4
4
0
8
8
8
1
1
7
0
7
6
8
3
8
2
6
0
0
8
0
6
0
a
3
8
Watar
Avaraga
Saa Not* 1
48
4
8
2
1
8
8
2
a
a
7
5
a
e
8
i
2
4
4
4
0
1
0
5
5
a
RCRA
Avaraga
SMNota 1
5.4
2
4
0
2
9
a
8
8
8
0
0
a
8
a
8
a
8
8
8
0
0
0
6
8
8
A. W. R
Avaraga
SaaNota:
7.2
7
a
e
a
a
a
8
8
8
8
8
0
6
0
a
8
8
Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
• of
pollutants
ovarhmit
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
63
8
15
1
0
4
4
6
9
14
4
3
5
3
6
4
S
5
8
7
NP
4
1
2
8
1?
* ol pouants
ragulotad
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
263
ia
31
17
6
24
47
28
35
40
22
2«
27
17
32
38
51
19
22
19
NP
19
12
14
23
39
* of raports
ovarkrrat
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
37.2
25
171
e
0
25
10
7
28
56
30
E
67
13
40
S
40
25
27
45
NP
23
1
4
26
1?8
t of raports
subrrittad
Avaraga
SMNota 1
2.445.7
1,150
1,533
499
468
1.495
4,415
2,866
5,714
2,»36
2,337
2,221
4,179
2.18$
2,906
2,828
3.509
2,458
2,346
2,944
NP
3.25S
896
975
561
4.181
Significant Noncomoiance Indicator
Air
°arcant ot
Facihtjas
SMNota 1
74.1%
Y
NP
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
¥
Y
N
Y
N
Y
y
Y
¥
NP
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Watar
Parcant of
FaciWas
SMNota 1
40.7%
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
V
N
Y
Y
Y
NP
N
N
N
Y
Y
RCRA
Parcart of
Faciftas
SMNota 1
25.9%
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
(4
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
H
N
N
N
N
N
Y
A+W*R
Avaraoa
SMNota 3
1.5
1
2
)
1
2
3
1
2
2
0
i
3
1
1
^
1
2
2
Z
0
1
0
1
2
i
Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years
Air
Avarega
SMNota 1
O.S
0
NP
f
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
NP
S
0
1
4
1
Watar
Avaraga
SMNota 1
0.7
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
5
1
Q
2
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
NP
0
0
0
0
2
RCRA
Avaraga
Saa Nota 1
05
i
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
Total
Avaraga
SM Nota 1
2.0
2
0
1
1
Z
1
0
2
8
2
2
5
0
4
0
5
0
0
1
0
$
0
1
4
5
Note 1 Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2 Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncompiance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3 Average number of programs In which faciilies are considered to be In significant noncompiance. (maximum vakje=3)
Note 4 This indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector Automobile Assembly: vehicles/year; Pulp Mils: short Ions/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Sled Mils: short tons/year Nonferrous Metals metric tons/year
Note 5 This indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. Average Is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 6 Average of those with at least one soil reported.
Note 7 Average of those with a spjl amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID* identified; NC = value not calculated; Inad = inactive permrt/lD*
72
-------
Integrated Iron and Steel Mills Data Summary
Table C
Data puled on Jury 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
•is
16
1?
18
19
20
21
22
2S
24
25
NAME
USXCOSP
GULF STATES STEEL, INC.
NATIONAL STEEL CORP
ACME STEEL CO
BETHLEHEM STEEUCORP,
INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES
LTV STEEL CO INC
USX CORP
AK STEEL CORP.
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP
ROUGE STEEL CD.
NATIONAL STEEL CORP
MCLOUTH STEEl
LTV STEEL CO. INC
USS/kOBS STEEL CO
AK STEEL CORP.
WHEELlNfrPITTSSURGH STEaCORP
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP
WCI STEEL, INC:
YOUNGSTOWN SINTER CO.
BETHLEH6W STEEL CORP,
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORP.
USX CORP
GENEVA STEEL
WBRtONSTEELCOftP.
Production
Snort Tons/Y aar
Avaraga
Saa Notes 1«4
2.594,167
2,240,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
900,000
900,000
4,100,000
8,730,000
1400,000
3.028,000
1,200,000
2,900.000
2>700.000
2,640,000
2.400.000
1,700,000
2,997,000
1.900,000
1,500,000
TRI Releases
1995- Total Pounds
Avaraga
SaaNote 1
1,300.768
4.41M24
896.530
6,006,140
80.714
1,483.170
246.450
727.110
10.540.528
68.881
1.532,566
57,555
353,970
25.300
843.460
42,510
1.086,212
78410
12.650
545.441
537
162.525
741.665
33,532
1.926.635
295,905
TRI Transfers
1995 - TOM Pounds
Avaraga
SaaNote 1
3,665.330
5,334,666
1,618,700
2549
886,103
8,755,849
2,601,956
163,855
4,301,316
338.900
172,150
17,684,446
14,026.712
16,100
1.232,352
851.723
623,515
469,430
0
5,926.036
0
25.765
8. 172,068
17.506.S96
56
2,916,298
TRI Releases *
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ producbon units
Avaraga
Saa Notes U 5
2.3
3.5
1.7
NC
1.0
11,4
32
0.2
1.7
04
NC
5:9
NC
0,0
0.7
0.3
0.7
NC
0.0
4.0
NC
NC
NC
39
1.0
0.9
TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
1998 - Total Poutts
Avaraga
SaaNote 1
9.561
0
7,505
34,464
0
11.650
420
0
77,805
3,760
0
0
22.155
0
0
0
7.308
0
12,000
0
0
44.705
0
0
16.732
523
TRI Releases *
Transfers -
Metals
1998 - Total Pounds
Avaraga
Saa Note 1
4.098.419
7,453,816
2,378,310
S,77i,S8B
880,690
706,810
2,710,050
7S9,S15
10,284,304
87,261
1.370.711
16.060,504
14.114.960
16,700
2.028.312
895,993
1.419.707
539,840
650
6.445,388
537
15
7.537.600
17,518,520
1,792.489
1.WS.209
TRI Production -
Related Waste
iaae - TOM Pouvfc
Avaraga
SaaNote 1
9.224.912
7.815,540
2.500.270
8,093.088
970.290
17.173.536
2.900.468
888,409
67,367.424
438,190
1,651,600
17,652.560
17,625.808
42.890
2,084,200
1,952,910
3,302,278
549,500
12,650
22,295,096
87,340
2,667,292
15,234,464
23,974,960
9.971,280
3.770,806
PoMant Soils
Soil Occun-anca
Parcantol
Facikbas
66.7%
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
last 2 years)
«ot Spite
Avaraga
Saa Note 6
7.9
3
€
3
15
1
11
24
i
1
1
29
12
3
12
11
3
1
3
Amou* Splad Cbs)
Avaraoa
SaaNotaT
20.009
150.926
830
18.44S
0
8,169
2,764
260
1.250
34,776
455
5.002
916
8,043
i
. 71.300
Surrounding
Population
mitos
Avaraga
SaaNote 1
56.662
55,645
27,610
39,416
139.459
5.806
13,558
33,308
55,777
38,770
11,711
114,793
53,325
80,767
140,944
81,931
42.400
1640?
31,867
56,216
73,837
86,272
45,514
110,663
78,259
20,405
Note 1 Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Nole 2 Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncompiance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act. dean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs in which fadltles are considered to be In sgnfflcant noncompiance. (maximum value=3)
Note 4: This indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector Automobile Assembly: vehicfcM/year; Pi* Mils: short Ions/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5: This indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors Average Is calculated for each sector using orty those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 6: Average of those with at least one soil reported.
Note 7: Average of those with a spll amount reported.
NP = no permit/IDf Identified; NC = value not calculated; Inact = inactive permit/IDl>
73
-------
-------
Steel Minimills Location Data
Table A
Data puled on July 13, 1996 from Integrated Data (or Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
: :: '1
2
t
4
5
e
7
8
'.:•:•:•:•:»
10
•;•«
12
:'.:::H
14
..: :i5
16
17
18
«
20
21
22
'•':23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
}1
32
:33
34
&
36
37
38
••"'••'•&
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
•'iff
48
;: ,:49
50
-: si
52
S3
54
;-;;S5
56
•St
58
NAME
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP.
STRUCTURAL METALS, INC
NUCOR-YAMATO STEEL CO.
MACSTEEL
NUCOR STEEL ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS STEEL ASSOCIATES
NORTH STAR STEEL CO
TAMCO
CF*I STEEL L.P,
ciTISTEEL USA, INC.
FLORIDA STEEL CORP.
FLORIDA STEEL CORP
ATLANTIC STEEL: INDUSTRIES: INC
PSCO STEEL INC.
NORTH STAR STEEL IOWA
LACLEDE STEEL CO.
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP,
A. FINKL 1 SONS CO.
CALUMET STEEL CO
AUSTEEL LEMONT CO.. INC
KEYSTONE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRI
NORTHWESTERN STEEL AND WIRE CO
NUCOR STEEL, CRAWFORDSVILLE M
SLATER STEELS CORP.
HAYNES INTERNATIONAL. INC.
KENTUCKY ELECTRIC STEEL. INC
GALLATW STEEL
NS GROUP INC.
GREEN RIVER STEEL CORP.
BAYOU STEEL CORP.
AVESTA SH6FWELD EAST INC
J*L SPECIALTY STEEL, INC
MACSTEEL
NORTH STAR STEEL CO
NORTH STAR STEEL CO-
GS TECHNOLOGIES CORP
BIRMINGHAM SOUTHEAST, LLC
FLORIDA STEEL CORP.
Nt*»rS<«<
CO-STEEL RARITAN
NEW JERSEY STEEL CORP
AUBURN STEEL CO.. INC
AL TECH SPECIALTY STEEL CORP
CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORP.
WORLD METALS, INC.
TIMKEN CO.. THE
WORTHINGTOtt INDUSTRIES INC
ARMCOINC.
MARION STEEL CO
CHAMPION STEEL CO., THE
COPPERWELO STEEL CO.
NORTH STAR STEEL CO.
SHEFFIELD: STEEL CORP.!
CASCADE STEEL ROLLING MILLS, 1
OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC
UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PR
STANDARD STEEL
ARMCO INC.
STREET ADDRESS
2301 f- L.:SHUTTLESWORTH DR;
101 S. 50TH ST.
5928 E STATE HIGHWAY 18
4700 PLANTERS RD,
7301 EAST COUNTY RD. 14Z
2803 VAN DYKE RD.
3000 HIGHWAY 66 SOUTH
12459 ARROW HIGHWAY
2100SFREEWAY
4001 PHILADELPHIA PIKE
HWY, 21 r, YELLOW WATER RD
7105E. 6THAVE.
384 OLD GRASSDALE W}.. NE
2011 7THAVE.
GREEN Rp. AND HIGHWAY 38
BROADWAY AND CUT STS.
972 EAST 4500 NORTH RD.
2011 N. SOUTHPORT AVE
« FEAST -NTH ST
NEW AVE AT CECO RD., PO BOX 2
7000 S.W. ADAMS ST.
121 WALLACE ST.
RR#2, BOX 311 [400 EAST, 400 S
2400 TAYLOR ST. WEST
2000 W DEFFENBAUGH
US60WATCOALTON
RT 42 AGNIELS CREEK
LICKING PIKE 4 QUEEN CITY AVE
*7m :U;S,:HIGHWAY 80 EAST
356 HIGHWAY 628
7700 ROLLING MltLftQ
330 SOUTH LIVERNOIS AVE.
3100 BROOKLYN RD,
3000 EAST FRONT ST.
MM RED SOCK RD:
7000 ROBERTS ST.
FOURTH ST., OFF FLOWOOD DR.
6601 LAKEVIEW RD.
291 1 E. NUCOR ROAD
225 ELM ST.
NORTH GROSSMAN RD.
PO BOX 2008. QUARRY ROAD
WH.LOWBROOKAVS
PO BOX 977
182 BEAVER ST.
1835 OUEBER AVE SW.
2J11 PARSONS AVE.
913 BOWMAN ST
912CH6NEYAVE,
8247 PENNIMAN RD.
4000 MAHONING AVE
2669 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BL
2300 SO. HWY, 97
3200 NORTH HIGHWAY 99W
1-4400 N RIVERSAT6 BLVD
600 MAYER ST
SOON, WALNUT ST,
101 THREE DEGREE RD.
CITY
BIRMINGHAM
BIRMINGHAM
BLYTHEViag
FORT SMITH
HICKMAN
NEWPORT
KINQMAN
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PUEBLO
CLAYMONT
BALDWIN
TAMPA
CWTERSV8.LE
CAMANCHE
WH.TON
ALTON
BOUBONNAIS
CHICAGO
CHICAGO HEIGHTS
LEMONT
PEOR1A
STERLING
CRAWFORDSVILLE
FORT WAYNE
KOKOMO
ASHLAND
(SHEMT
WILDER
OWENSBORO
LAPLACE
BALTIMORE
DETROIT
JACKSON
MONROE
ST. PAUL
KANSAS CITY
JACKSON
CHARLOTTE
NORFOLK
PERTH AMBOY
SAYREVH.LE
AUBURN
DUNKIRK
SYRACUSE
AKRON
CANTON
COLUWWS
MANSFIELD
MARION
ORWELL
WARREN
YOUNGSTOWN
SAND SPRINGS
MCMINNVILLE
PORTLAND
BRIDGEVILLE
8URNHAM
BUTLER
ST
AL
AL
AR
AR
AR
AR
AZ
CA
CO
DE
FL
FL
GA
A
IA
L
L
L
IL
IL
L
L
IN
N
IN
KY
K¥
KY
KY
LA
MD
Ml
Ml
Ml
MN
MO
MS
NC
NE
NJ
NJ
NY
NY
NY
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OK
OR
O«
PA
PA
PA
EPA
RGN
04
04
06
06
OE
06
09
09
08
03
04
04
0+
07
or
05
OS
05
05
05
05
05
OS
OS
OS
04
04
0.
04;
06
0,
05
05
05
OS
07
0*
04
07
02
02
02
02
02
05
05
OS
05
OS
05
OS
05
06
10
10
03
OS
03
75
-------
Steel Minim ills Data Summary
Table B
Data pulled on July 1 3. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
g
9
10
11
12
1S
14
15
16
17
18
18
20
21
22
2i
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
NAME
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP;
STRUCTURAL METALS. INC.
NUCOR-YAMATQ STEEL CO.
MACSTEEL
NUCOR STEEL ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS STEEL ASSOCIATES
NORTH STAR STEEL CO.
TAMCO
CF4I STEEL L.P.
CITISTEEL USA, INC.
RORIQASTEEiCORP,
FLORIDA STEEL CORP.
ATLANTIC STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC
IPSCO STEEL INC.
NORTH STAR STEEL IOWA
LACLEDE STEEL CO.
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP:
A FINKL I SONS CO
CALUMET STEEL CO
AUSTEEL LEMONT CO , INC
KEYSTONE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRI
NORTHWESTERN STEEL AND WIRE CO
NUCOR STEEL, CRAWfOHDSVILLE W
SLATER STEELS CORP
HAYNEB INTERNATIONAL; INE
KENTUCKY ELECTRIC STEEL. INC
GAtLATIN STEEL
NS GROUP INC
GREEN RIVER STEEL CORP.
BAYOU STEEL CORP.
AVESt A SHEFFIELD CAST INC
J»L SPECIALTY STEEL. INC
MACSTEEL
NORTH STAR STEEL CO.
NORTH STAR STEEL CO.
GS TECHNOLOGIES CORP
BIRMINGHAM SOUTHEAST. LLC
FLORIDA STEEL CORP
Nucor Steel
CO-STEEL RARITAN
NEW JERSEY STEEl CORP.
AUBURN STEEL CO., INC.
AL TECH SPECIALTY STEEL CORP.
CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORP.
WORLD METALS, INC.
TIMKEN CO.. THE
WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES. INC.
ARMCO INC.
MARION STEEL CD.
CHAMPION STEEL CO.. THE
COPPERWELO STEEL CO
NORTH STAR STEEL CO.
SHEFFIELD STEEL CORP.
CASCADE STEEL ROLLING MILLS. 1
OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC
UNIVERSAL STAINLESS « ALLOY PR
STANDARD STEEL
ARMCO INC.
'nspedions (2 years)
Air
TOM
Average
See Note!
30
2
0
2
1
2
2
4
2
2
9
1
NP
3
1
D
3
4
3
2
6
3
3
4
3
NP
2
3
2
1
4
11
NP
1
2
0
2
NP
2
a
2
2
1
1
2
NP
1
1
6
2
NP
4
0
3
2
2
NP
3
4
Water
Total
Average
See Mole 1
1.6
1
2
0
1
1
1
NP
NP
0
9
0
0
NP
1
1
2
2
0
NP
2
4
8
2
NP
2
3
3
9
2
2
8
NP
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NP
NP
3
NP
3
0
2
0
NP
2
0
NP
0
0
2
3
3
RCRA
Averw
See Note!
1.6
5
7
1
0
0
0
1
0
4
0
0
0
0
1
0
7
1
0
1
0
7
7
2
4
8
3
2
6
4
0
5
0
1
0
4
0
1
1
2
0
1
0
2
4
:NP
1
0
1
1
NP
2
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
Total
Average
See Note!
5.7
9
9
3
2
3
3
5
2
6
17
1
0
3
3
•f
12
7
3
3
8
14
18
a
7
10
8
8
17
7
6
26
0
3
2
4
2
1
3
5
2
3
1
3
9
NP
5
1
9
3
NP
8
1
5
2
3
3
g
8
Historical Noncompiance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompliance
event)
Air
Average
See Not. !
1.4
4
0
0
0
0
5
7
0
0
0
0
0
a
1
0
1
5
2
0
8
0
8
4
0
0
0
-------
Steel Minim ills Data Summary
Table C
Data pulled on Jury 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
9
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
97
58
NAME
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP.
STRUCTURAL METALS. INC
NUCOR-YAMATO STEEL CO
MACSTEEL
NUCOR STEEL ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS STEEL ASSOCIATES
NORTH STAR STEEL CO.
TAMCO
CF»I STEEL L.P.
CITISTEEL USA. INC.
FLORIDA STEEL CORP
FLORIDA STEEL CORP
ATLANTIC STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC
IPSCO STEEL INC.
NORTH STAR STEEL IOWA
LACLEDE STEEL CO
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP.
A FINKL 4 SONS CO.
CALUMET STEEL CO.
AUSTEEL LEMONT CO.. INC.
KEYSTONE CONSOLIDATED INOUSTRI
NORTHWESTERN STEEL AND WIRE CO
NUCOR STEEL. CRAvVFOROSVILLE IN
SLATER STEELS CORP.
HAYNES. INTERNATIONAL. INC.
KENTUCKY ELECTRIC STEEL. INC
GAUATIN STEEL
NS GROUP INC
GREEN RIVER STEEL CORP.
BAYOU STEEL CORP.
AVESTA SHEFFIELD EAST INC
J»L SPECIALTY STEEL. INC.
MACSTEEL
NORTH STAR STEEL CO
NORTH:STAR STEEL co,
GS TECHNOLOGIES CORP
BIRMINGHAM SOUTHEAST, LLC
FLORIDA STEEL CORP
Nucor Steel
CO-STEEL RARITAN
NEW JERSEY ETE& CORP.
AUBURN STEEL CO . INC.
AL TECH SPECIALTY STEEL CORP.
CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORP
WORLD METALS. INC,
TIMKEN CO.. THE
WORTHInKJTON INDUSTRIES, rNC
ARMCOINC
MARION STEEL CO
CHAMPION STEEL CO , THE
COPPERWELD STEEL CO
NORTH STAR STEEL CO.
SHEFFIELD STEEL CORP,
CASCADE STEEL ROLLING MILLS. I
OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC!
UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PR
STANDARD STEEL
ARMCO INC
Production
Snort Tons/Year
Average
See Notes la 4
621.699
500.000
550.000
2,200.000
345.000
3,000,000
220.000
500
440.000
1.000.000
400.000
500,000
850,000
1,350.000
350.006
1,000,000
886,000
150,000
300,000
850,000
2,400.000
1500.006
75.000
300,000
1,200.00?
700.000
140,000
800.000
200.006
400,000
215,000
600,000
700,000
1,000.000
400,000
340.000
580.006
900.000
650,000
450,000
60,000
10,500
1.500,000
720.000
390.000
2.190
550,000
700,000
450,000
150.000
232,000
TRI Releases
1996 -Tow Pounds
Average
Sea Note 1
488.116
240.037
6,049
30.584
37,235
Imd
89,130
NP
5,390
112,669
32,324
19.122
Inact
21,303
NP
26,629
23,886
7.711
10,552
2,249
1,473,631
1,705,417
14,484,216
11.256
16,310
NK(
9,635
30,318
10.998
15.200
22.004
5,287
20.088
176.949
19,759
35,229
165.500
8.410
43.300
2,Bu5
28.395
Intel
4.900
26,588
13.918
NP
12,633
26,874
43,397
33,503
0
63.000
27.400
24.949
2.648
18,071
755
67,997
15678392
TRI Transfers
1996- Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
3.762.923
4.7E3.632
3.936.400
16.726,664
9.355.968
2.077.461
NP
4.738,732
6.519.404
2.668,690
7.753,448
Inact
8,208,300
NP
3.604,914
418.564
4:593.420
15,306
550,755
1.421,489
5,184.140
144,800
17.488.368
1.416.860
(met
1.508.211
9.573,000
1,880.600
387,011
4.964,708
564,452
7,633,748
1;715,507
4.975.164
4,270,276
8.668,400
2,259,010
3.389.392
7.679,144
8,090.788
tact
2,788.764
682,032
633.116
NP
5.065,700
388,086
3,898,572
2.918.250
0
2.935,900
2,576,860
3,958,826
5.389,092
4,266,260
15.590
890.800
49.994
TRI Releases *
Translers per
Production Unit
pounds/ production ixtfs
Average
See Notes 14 5
7.9
10,0
7.2
76
272
:NC
99
NC
108
6,6
66
156
NC
7.3
NC
14.4
04
5,2
NC
37
9.7
10.8
6.1
11.7
19.1
NC
5.1
6.0
2.7
2.9
62
2.9
19.1
8.9
8.3
62
8.8
5.7
10.1
13-2
9.0
NC
62
120
NC
NC
34
NC
5.5
7,9
00
NC
NC
7.2
7.7
9.5
0.1
4.1
NC
TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
999
0
0
0
0
tract
0
NP
0
0
0
0
Inact
0
NP
0
0
0
107
0
0
0
160
0
0
toad
0
0
8
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
rrwcf
0
7,620
1,782
NP
66
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
112
0
0
0
TRI Releases +
Transfers -
Metals
1 996 -Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
3,937.353
5.003.658
3.942,448
16.757,448
9,374,608
Inact
1,948.162
tit>
4.744.120
6:586.07!
2.701.014
7,772,568
Inact
8,229,600
NP
3,631,542
378,006
4.601.128
25,447
553,004
2.895,120
8.867,528
14.576,160
17,440,566
1.191,610
Inad
1.517,846
8.803,312
1.890.190
399,956
4.986.712
257.066
4.910,516
1.692.455
4,994,924
4,305,282
8.833.896
2,287,450
3,432.692
7681.952
8,114,584
Inact
2 793 664
526:231
533.242
NP
4,979.676
6
3,848,276
2.868.904
0
2,998,900
2.604.260
3480,350
5.391,740
4,266,736
15,625
958.737
413,503
TRI Production -
Related Waste
1996- Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
4.902.864
:5;,On3:,68B
3,945,536
S.J41.328
11.862,208
Imd
2.166,536
NP
4,744.328
6.5SZ.500
2,701.014
4,054.530
Inact
8,171.532
NP
3,631,532
817.626
4.601,128
132.807
552,464
1,473.131
16,717,152
14,876,656
17.594792
1.431,860
feMCf
1.517,214
9,603,280
1,891,331
1,790.200
4.986.712
10,469, 400
8,233,644
1.828,509
4,995,312
4,298,852
8.835.144
2,287.414
3.432.720
2,577
8,119,180
Intel
2793648
i4«l730
1.910,772
NP
5,964.000
482,511
5,143,300
2.946,222
o
2*9*,T20
2,604,264
3,992.634
5,463,476
4,274,348
585,172
954.900
45.679.040
Poljtant Spills
Spl Occurrence
Percent ol
FaaMes
16.5%
N
N
N
N
N
N
¥
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
¥
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
M
::Z:z:Z:ZZ Z 2 Z
last 2 years)
folSpIs
Average
See Note 6
2.1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
4
Amount Soried (6s)
Average
See Note 7
5.375
30.004
1.760
75
50
150
0
Surrounding
Population
Residents mtnin
3mles
Average
See Note 1
39,103
65.339
80,007
16.024
20.824
4.124
0
26309
50.610
59,524
4,691
31.433
17,580
7,130
2,612
38,125
43.560
480,226
63.060
31.032
22,463
22.359
1542
79.170
46.963
30.564
99.058
7,248
11.861
119,523
73,621
18.344
16,568
43.O07
57,079
31.889
8,926
5,818
83,891
74.314
2SJ.86
76,883
73437
70.462
49^143
38.653
2 437
34S30
58,659
21,453
18.177
9,350
64,630
14.859
Note 1. Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2: Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncompliance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act Clean Water Act or RCR A)
Note 3: Average number of programs in which facilities are considered to be in significant noncompSance (maximum value=3)
N£ £ TOs IS!! NOT cZ££ a'cZ ir^f T* T """' "^T?i°',' "T "*°mM>° *"""* vehictes/year; Pulp M«s: short Ions/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mi»s: short tons*..,; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 6 Average o('most,^0, iTkEM^m \™ ^ " " ' SeCtW USIn9 Onty thOSe °bse'v"i°n* "^ "°^"° values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 7 Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP = no permil/IO* identified; NC = value not calculated; Inact = inactive permit/ID*
77
-------
Steel Minim ills Location Data
Table A
Data puled on July 13.1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
7S
76
77
78
79
60
»1
82
83
84
85
86
87
00
es
90
91
NAME
IWENSStESL.ASUBOFUJKENS,
FIRSTMISS STEEL. INC.
NATIONAL FORGE CO
BAR TECHNOLOGIES. INC
NS GROUP INC.
LATROBE STEEL COMPANY
STANtJARtJ STEEL
TELEDYNEALLVAC
ELUWOOO QUALITY STEELS CO.
EDGEWATER CORP.
EL£CTRAaOY(AG.O CARLSON IN
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP
PENNSYLVAN W BIEEl TEGHNOLOGIE
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORP.
WASHINGTON StEeLCOHP
STRUCTURAL METALS. INC.
NUCOR STEEL
GEORGETOWN STEEL CORP.
AMERISTEEL
FLORIDA STEEL CORP.
NORTH STARSTEEL :
BORDER STEEL MILLS. INC.
NucorSIeBl
LONE STAR STEEL CO.
LETOURNEAU, INC. STEEL GROUP
CHAPARRAL STEEL CO
IRIINTEHNATIONAL
STRUCTURAL METALS, INC.
NUCOR STEEL- DtVOF NUCOR COR
RGANOKE ELbUTKIU S 1 bbL COKK
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP
CHARTER MANUFACTURING CO
STEEt OF WEST VIRGINIA, INC.
STREET ADDRESS
ARC BUILDING.: MODEMA RD.
RTE. 601 S.
100 FRONT ST
227 FRANKLIN STREET. SUITE 300
2626 LIGONIER ST.
107(3eRTRUpE$r
PA ROUTE 981 NORTH
700 MORAVIA ST.
300 COLLEGE AVE.
21 SENECA ST.
101 W. BERN ST.
500 GREEN ST.
WOODLANQ ANP GRIFFITH
PO BOX 2005
300 STEEL MILL ROAD, P.O. BOX
SOUTH HAZARD ST.
US-4SN
1919 TENNESSEE AVE.
OLD HWY 90, PO BOX 2390
IH-10ANDVINTONRD.
PO BOX 125. US HWY 7S SOUTH
HWY 259 E 3 MILES
2400 MCARTHUR DR
300 WARD RD
PO BOX 1101
STEEL MILL RD.. PO BOX 91 1
PO BOX 100. W CEMETERY ROAD
102 WESTSIDE BLVD. N.W.
2424 S W ANOOVSR
1658 COLD SPRING DR.
2NDAVEANDirTHST.
CITY
COATESVILLE
HOLLSOPPLE
IRVINE
JOHNSTOWN
W»>PEL
LATROBE
tATROee
LATROBE
NEWCASTLE
OAKMONT
OILCITV
READING
STEELTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
CAYCE
DARLINGTON
GEORGETOWN
JACKSON
KNOXVILLE
BEAUMONT
EL PASO
J6WETT
LONE STAR
LONGVIEW
MIDLOTHIAN
PAMPA
SEGUIN
PLYMOUTH
ROANOKE
SEATTLE
SAUKVILLE
HUNTINGTON
ST
PA:
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
SC
SC
SC
TN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
UT
VA
WA
Wl
Wtf
EPA
RGN
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
OS
03
oi
03
0}
03
OS
04
04
04
04
04
06
06
06
06
OS
06
OS
06
08
03
«
05
03
-------
Steel Minimills Data Summary
Table B
Dala pulled on July 13. 1996 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
59
60
81
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
89
70
71
72
71
74
75
76
77
78
79
90
61
B2
83
S4
85
86
»7
88
69
90
91
NAME
LUKENS STEEL. A SUB OF LUKENS;
FIRSTMISS STEEL, INC.
NATIONAL FORGE CO
BAR TECHNOLOGIES. INC
NS GROUP INC.
LATROBE STEEL COMPANY
STANDARD STEEL
TELEDYNEALLVAC
ELLWOOD QUAirnr STEELS CO.
EDGEWATER CORP.
EtECTRALLOYIAGO CARLSON IN
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP
PENNSYLVANIA ST66L TgCHNOLOGtE
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORP.
WASHINGTON STEEL CORP
STRUCTURAL METALS. INC
NUCOR STEEL
GEORGETOWN STEEL CORP
AMERfSTEEL
FLORIDA STEEL CORP
NORTH STAR STEEL CO,
BORDER STEEL MILLS. INC
Nucor Steel
LONE STAR STEEL CO
IETOURNEAU. INC. STEEL GROUP
CHAPARRAL STEEL CO
tRI INTERNATIONAL
STRUCTURAL METALS, INC.
NUCOR STEEL • DTV OF NUCOR COR
ROANOKE ELECTRIC STEEL CORP
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP.
CHARTER MANUFACTURING CO
STEEL OF WEST VIRGINIA. INC:
Inspections (2 years)
Air
Total
Average
See Note 1
30
1
1
1
NP
T
5
2
4
3
3
3
9
5
1
2
2
Z
3
0
0
2
3
2
1
0
2
0
1
4
9
8
4
Water
Tow
Avecaoe
See Note 1
1.6
2
0
3
0
0
1
0
1
3
2
0
2
4
4
2
0
0
4
NP
1
:1
NP
NP
1
0
NP
NP
0
0
2
0
NP
RCRA
Total
Average
Sa«Not« 1
1.8
1
1
2
2
J
5
0
1
3
0
0
2
4
0
0
3
2
2
6
2
4
2
2
3
5
3
0
0
1
1
0
1
WV 38.4269 0
Total
Average
See Note 1
5.7
4
2
6
2
9
11
2
6
9
5
3
13
13
5
4
5
4
9
6
3
7
5
4
5
5
5
0
1
5
12
6
5
2
Historical NoocompHance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompSance
event)
Air
Average
See Note 1
1.4
0
0
0
0
8
4
0
2
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
8
5
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
a
i
NP
Water
Average
SaaNota 1
2.3
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
8
0
3
0
a
2
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
e
0
0
0
NP
RCRA
Average
SaaNota 1
23
0
0
0
2
0
6
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
a
o
0
0
3
6
8
8
0
6
0
2
0
0
a
0
0
8
NP
A. W R
Average
SaaNota}
4.3
7
0
0
2
t
8
0
2
Z
0
0
0
4
2
0
8
8
6
3
8
8
8
0
8
0
2
0
1
8
0
0
8
1
Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
* 0)
poftjtants
over himt
Average
SaaNolal
32
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
0
0
6
NP
2
2
NP
NP
4
0
NP
NP
0
2
1
0
NP
0
a ot poejtarts
regulated
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
13.4
19
0
D
0
U
0
0
0
0
0
-------
Steel Minimills Data Summary
Table C
Data puled on July 13. 1 998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
71
73
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
.91
NAME
UIKENS STEEL. A SUB OF IUKENS. :
FIRSTMISS STEEL. INC.
NATIONAL FORGE CO
BAR TECHNOLOGIES. INC
NS GROUP INC.
LATROBE STEEL COMPANY
STANDARD STEEL
TELEDYNE AUVAC
ELLWOOD QUALITY STEELS CO:
EDGEWATER CORP
ELECTRALLOY (A G 0- CARLSON IN
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP
PENNSYLVANIA STEEL TECHNOLOGIE
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORP.
WASHINGTON STEEL CORP
STRUCTURAL METALS, INC.
NUCOR STEEL
GEORGETOWN STEEL CORP
AMERISTEEL
FLORIDA STEEL CORP.
NORTH STAR STEEL CO.
BORDER STEEL MILLS. INC
Nucor Sleet
LONE STAR STEEL CO
LETOURNEAU. INC STEEL GROUP
CHAPARRAL STEEL CO.
IRI INTERNATIONAL
STRUCTURAL METALS, INC.
NUCOR STEEt - »V Of NUCOR COR
ROANOKE ELECTRIC STEEL CORP
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP.
CHARTER MANUFACTURING CO
STEELOFWEST VIRGINIA. INC.
Production
Snort-Tons/Yaar
SM Notas U 4
621,699
: ::: :: 150.000-
270,000
100.000
1,500.000
400,000
58.000
300.000
41.600
200,000
1,200,000
200,000
550.000
850.000
475.000
365.000
900,000:
270.000
600.000
500.000
100,000
1.500,000
775.000
930,000
650.000
740.000-
300.000
N
TRI Releases
1996 -Total Pounds
Avarega
SaaNota 1
488,116
;• ;--:':;r:W5,W9
11.381
432,456
NP
9.990
85.083
9,827
411,132
49t
87
21,248
2.379,670
4,015
15.080
S6.W9
2.508
114,722
44.711
2?,s$7
56.825
135,953
11,981
535,547
147.100
51.677
15.842
36,433
2.285
22.674
4,040
Inact
16.160
a
TRI Transfers
1996 - Total Pounds
Avarage
SaaNola 1
3.762.923
V:V:'"::»;»j,«6.
425.083
165,414
NP
2,902,488
764,599
4-16.460
324,314
131v935
779
28r,86?
3.665.266
972,000
10.045.856
1.062,652
2.490.098
7368,476
9,678.296
5,303,896
2,249,782
5,683,484
2.887.828
7.730,808
2.560.390
120.454
12,028.848
0
6,381,664
8,178,916
2.320.312
h*cf
1,759.930
0
TRI Releases *
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ production units
Avaraga
SM Notes 1« S
7.9
•:::;::';:;::::;:::;::11*
16
60
NC
7,0
NC
r.4
NC
0,4
0.0
NC
30.2
08
NC
5.8
NC
13.6
11.4
112
63
65
107
148
5.4
1.9
8.0
NC
82
67
3.6
NC
5.9
0
TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
1996 - Total Pounds
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
999
•::::-::::::-:::-:::0
0
1,905
NP
0
0
a
50.668
17
75
0
18.069
0
0
&
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
750
47
0
0
0
16
Inact
500
350.000
TRI Releases •>
Transfers -
Metals
1996 -Tot* Pounds
Avaraoa
SaaNota t
3.937.353
7.8B5396
436,464
165,909
NP
1808,724
127,320
426,26?
490.346
127.928
190
308.002
3.682,658
978,015
9.760,624
546.666
2,492.596
7.450.948
9.723,008
5,331,780
2.306,606
5,819,436
2,899,808
8,243.336
2,577.930
H5.S37
12.037,088
36,433
6,383,948
6,201,464
2,288.318
Inact
1.748.150
969:322
TRI Production -
Related Waste
1996 > Total Pounds
Awaga
SaaNota 1
4.902,864
:: : :*;740,0*a
433.080
59/.S10
NP
3,622.998
838.783
426,300
947,880
132,426
850
380,881
14.428.552
972.000
10,479.264
2,561,580
2,871,522
7,452,568
9.900,208
5J31,780
2,305.818
5,819.438
2.899,812
?.r«*796
2.799,000
836,419
12,045,192
36,429
6,436.996
7,994,?44
2.324,352
lhaef
1.775.012
M
Potutant Soils
Spil Occuranca
parcart or
Facikhas
165%
•:;;;:-:;;;;;;r:*
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
0
last 2 years)
* of Spits
Avaraga
SaaNotaG
2.1
:.:•:••;:••::• " t
1
4
2
1
1
0
Amount Spdaddjs]
AWW
SaaNota?
5,375
-:::;;::r:;:m»M
500
26,662
148
3.068
200
0
Surrounding
Population
Rastdants Mthin
3milas
Awaraga
SaaNota 1
39.103
::-;:::25;?ra
4.409
2.61S
56,254
15,787
20,593
20,601
21.063
36.771
44,711
14,904
107,526
63,693
35,358
33,602
37.210
1220
10.871
?,788
76,839
39,108
10.988
•(,12?
903
7.400
3,717
3,411
64,932
76,554
9,071
21,950
Note 1: Average Is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2: Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs In which fadlties are considered to be In significant noncomplance. (maximum value=3)
Note 4: This indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors The units apply only to a sector Automobile Assembly: veNdes/yean Pulp MIN: short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short Ions/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tonsjyear
Note 5 This Inricator Is MOT comparable across Industry sectors. Average Is calculated for each sector using orry those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 6: Average of those with at least one soil reported
Note 7: Average of those with a soil amount reported
NP - no permit/ion identified: NC = value not calculated: Inact = Inactive permit/ID*
-------
Primary Aluminum Refineries Location Data
Table A
Data pulled on July 13, 1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
• 11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
NAME
ALUMINUM CO, OF AMERICA
NSA - DIVISION OF SOUTHWIRE CO
ALCAN ALUMINUM CORP.
ALUMAX INC (EASTALCO)
NORANDA ALUMINUM INC.
COLUMBIA FALLS ALUMINUM CO.
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
REYNOLDS METALS CO,
ORMET CORP
NORTHWEST ALUMINUM CORP.
REYNOLDS METALS CO
ALUMAX INC
ALUMINUM CO OF AMERICA
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
ALUMAX INC (INTALCO)
GQLDENDALE ALUMINUM COMPANY
REYNOLDS METALS CO
KAISER ALUMINUM - MEAD WORKS
KAISER ALUMINUM - TACOMA WORKS
VANALCO INC.
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
RAVENSWOOD ALUMINUM CORP.
STREET ADDRESS
WARRICK OPERATfONSST
1627 STATE ROUTE 271 NORTH
HIGHWAY 2096
5601 MANOR WOODS RD
STJUOE INDUSTRIAL P
2000 ALUMINUM DR.
HWY 740
PARK AVE. EAST
S GRASS RIVER R0.PO
43840 ST RT 7
3313 W 2ND ST
5000 NE SUN DIAL RD.
HWY 52 4 176
300 N HALL RD.
FM 1786 5MSWOF ROC
4050 MOUNTAIN VW. RD
85 JOHN DAY DAM RD.
4029 INDUSTRIAL WAY
E2111 HAWTHORNE RD.
3400 TAYLOR WAY
5701 NW LOWER FflVEf? ROAD
6200 MALAGA HWY.
PO BOX 98 WJLLOW GRJ
CITY
NEWBURGH
HAWESVILLE
HENDERSON
FREDERICK
NSW MADRID
COLUMBIA FALLS
BADIN
MASSENA
MASS6NA
ORMET
THE DALLES
TROUTDALE
GOOSE CRE6K
ALCOA
ROCKDALE
FERNDALE, BELLINGHAM
GOLDENDALE
LONGVIEW
MEAD (SPOKANE)
TACOMA
VANCOUVER
MALAGA
RAVENSWOOD
ST
IN
KY
KY
MD
MO
MT
NC
NY
NY
OH
OR
OR
$e
TN
TX
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WV
EPA
RGN
05
04
04
03
or
08
04
02
02
05
10
10
04
04
06
10
to
10
10
10
tO
10
03
81
-------
Primary Aluminum Refineries Data Summary
Table B
Data puled on Jury 13, 1998 from Integrated
Data (of Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1i
16
: 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
NAME
ALUMINUM CO. Of AMERICA
NSA - DIVISION OF SOUTHWIRE CO
ALCAN ALUMINUM CORP.
ALUMAX INC (EASTALCO)
NORANDA ALUMINUM INC.
COLUMBIA FALLS ALUMINUM CO
ALUMINUM CO OF AMERICA
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
REYNOLDS METALS CO.
ORMET CORP
NORTHWEST ALUMINUM CORP
REYNOLDS METALS CO
ALUMAX INC
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
ALUMAX INC (INTALCO)
GO.D6NDALE ALUMINUM COMPANY
REYNOLDS METALS CO.
KAISER ALUMINUM. MEAD WORKS
KAISER ALUMINUM - TACOMA WORKS
VANALCO INC,
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
RAVENSWOOD ALUMINUM CORP.
Inspections (2 years)
Air
TOW
Awfaoa
SMNOU1
2.4
4
3
3
3
2
2
4
3
2
2
3
2
1
1
:1
1
3
3
1
3
2
1
6
Water
ToW
Avaraga
SaeNolal
36
9
2
2
7
1
0
4
£
t
4
3
1
2
3
1
4
6
4
4
4
4
3
i I
RCRA
ToW
Avaraga
SaaNola 1
21
7
4
B
0
t
2
S
2
2
2
1
1
4
0
1
0
2
2
a
2
0
0
2
Total
Avaraga
SaeNota 1
8.1
26
9
13
10
4
4
11
11
11
8
r
4
r
4
3
5
11
9
J
9
6
4
1«
Historical Noncomplance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompiance
event)
Air
Avaraga
SaaNotal
1.0
4
0
0
0
3
1
0
2
0
6
0
0
0
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
wot*
Avaraga
SeaNota!
2.3
1
6
0
0
Q
0
0
8
8
6
0
1
0
2
0
4
2
5
1
4
0
3
1
RCRA
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
2.0
1
0
8
0
0
2
1
0
1
5
8
0
1
8
a
0
«
0
0
3
0
0
a
A, W. R
Averaga
SaaNota 2
4.3
6
6
8
0
3
3
1
8
8
8
*
1
1
8
1
4
2
5
1
6
0
3
a
Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
• of
poMarts
ovwtmi!
Avaraga
SaaNole 1
4.5
6
11
1
3
7
6
3
)3
amount reported.
NP * no permMD* identified: NC = value not calculated: Inact = Inactive permit/ID*
-------
Primary Aluminum Refineries Data Summary
Table C
Dale puled on July 13, 1998 from Integrated
Data (of Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
t
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1f
12
13
14
13
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
NAME
ALUMINUM CO Of AMERICA
NSA - DIVISION OF SOUTHWIRE CO
ALCAN ALUMINUM CORP.
ALUMAX INC (EASTALCO)
NORANDA ALUMINUM INC
COLUMBIA FALLS ALUMINUM CO
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
ALUMINUM CO OF AMERICA
REYNOLDS METALS CO.
ORMET CORP
NORTHWEST ALUMINUM CORP.
REYNOLDS METALS CO
ALUMAX INC.
ALUMINUM CO OF AMERICA
ALUMINUM CO OF AMERICA
ALUMAX INC. (INTALCO)
GOLD6NOALE ALUMtNUM COMPANY
REYNOLDS METALS CO
KAISER ALUMINUM - MEAD WORKS
KAISER ALUMINUM - TACOMA WORKS
VANAICOINC.
ALUMINUM CO OF AMERICA
RAVENSWOOO ALUMINUM CORP,
Production
Metric Tons/Year
Km*
SM Notes li 4
182.696
300,000
186,000
186.000
174,000
215,000
168,000
119,000
125,000
123,000
256,000
42.900
121,000
205.000
210,000
315,000
272.000
168,000
204,000
200.000
73,000
11S.OOO
220,000
168.000
TRI Releases
1996- Total Pounds
Averaoe
See Note 1
668,666
2.296.64S
507.627
88,620
400.270
718.814
275.656
175,878
756,123
159,670
358,000
549,250
293
1.166.340
1.003.881
1,909,875
487.207
120.5*8
249,904
1,254,505
305,389
1.049,255
660.781
677,747
TRI Transfers
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
371.608
1,374,73*
39,954
0
250
27,007
250
2,826
706
10.10*
0
302,497
3,750
1.711,484
2,422,552
33,050
2,920
0
991,339
962,361
122,000
17.39S
21,076
496,720
TRI Releases +
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ production trvts
Average
SM Notes 14 5
5.5
t2.J
29
0.5
23
3.5
1.6
1.6
6.1
3.0
14
<04
0.0
14.0
163
62
1.8
a.?
6.1
11.1
59
9.Z
3.1
7.0
TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
1996 - Total Pouids
Average
SaaNota 1
20.590
A300
0
0
0
104.208
20.128
3,264
3.033
300,250
0
0
0
2,058
1,225
2,830
0
s
22.874
1.25O
5,072
0
3,657
409
TRI Releases *
Transfers-
Metals
1996- Tola! Pounds
Average
See Note 1
146,987
741.S74
2,204
0
0
160
0
2,085
6,678
10,100
0
0
3.762
0
944.017
18,565
13
0
18,572
362,881
120,871
17,«51
1.651
489.409
TRI Production -
Related Waste
1996 - TOW Pounds
Average
SaaNotal
7.216.273
S*,flT7,440
3,345,896
15,784,616
670,000
5.748,784
10.160.688
3,293,858
9,800.392
527.500
4,296,000
1.013.075
52,962
2.879,450
18.949.008
12.676,696
6.017,768
5,tt3,fJOft
3,844.624
2.280.490
601,310
5.868,000
13.669.168
3.257.530
Polutant Soils
Soil Occurrence
Parcanl of
Facikbas
56.5%
Y
N
¥
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
ast 2 years)
< ol Sols
Avaraoa
SaeNot«6
1.6
4
i
1
1
3
J
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
Aim** Spilad (bs)
Average
See Note 7
8,015
3.75«
126
1,500
*,?58
417
5,785
625
3J
30
65,000
6,136
Surrounding
Population
Residents Mtftn
3>nles
Average
SMNote 1
10,337
17.152
8.988
1.20B
2,585
706
2,920
t,871
11,579
11.579
1,392
10,885
22.744
20,735
22.309
1.040
30.452
32,566
30,786
M73.
754
1.060
Note 1 Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2 Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act. Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3 Average number of programs In which (sallies are considered to be In sigrificant noncompiance. (maximum value=3)
Note 4 This indcator is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply onry to a sector: Automobile Assembly: vehidesyyear; Pulp Mils: short tons/day: Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Sled Mils: short tons/year; Norrferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5 This indicator is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. Average Is calculated fof each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 6 Average of those with at least one soil reported.
Note 7 Average of tnose with I spil amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID* identified. NC = value not calculated: Inact = inactive permit/ID*
83
-------
-------
Primary Copper Refineries Location Data
Table A
Data pulled on July 13,1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
NAME
CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS CO.
CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS CO.
ARIMETCO
CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS CO.
ASARCO INC.
ARIMETCO INTERNATIONAL INC.
CYPRUS CUMAX METALS CO.
MAGMA COPPER CO.
CHEMETCO (CONCORDE METALS)
RECONTEK INC.
NORTH CHICAGO SMELT. &REF.
ESSEX GROUP
COPPER RANGE CO.
WARRENTON REFINING CO
PHELPS DODGE CORP.
ARIMETCO
FRANKLIN SMELTING & REFINING
ASARCO INC.
ASARCO INC.
PHELPS DODGE CORP.
KENNECOTT
STREET ADDRESS
INSPIRATION RD.
640 ASARCO AVE.
800 EPIMA MINE RD.
STATE HIGHWAY 76
2028 S SHERIDAN RD.
COUNTRY ROAD M
W1NSLOW RL. SUP
CASTOR AVE., EAST
PO BOX 30200
2301 W PAISANO DRIVE
NORTH LOOP RD.
CITY
BAGDAD
CASA GRANDE
EMERALD ISLE
GLOBE (MIAMI)
HAYDEN
JOHNSON CAMP
SAHUARtTA
SAN MANUEL
ALTON
NEWMAN
NORTH CHICAGO
COLUMBIA CITY
WHITE PINE
WARRENTON/TRUESDALE
HILDALGO/PLAYAS
YERRINGTON
PHttADELPHIA
AMARILLO
EL PASO
EL PASO
MAGNA
ST
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
IL
IL
IL
IN
Ml
MO
NM
NV
PA
TX
TX
TX
UT
EPA
RGN
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
OS
05
05
05
05
07
06
09
03
06
OS
06
08
85
-------
Primary Copper Refineries Data Summary
Table B
Data puled on July 13, 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
6
e
7
a
s
10
(1
12
13
14
15
16
1?
18
19
20
, 21
NAME
CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS CO.
CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS CO
ARIMETCO ;••;•••
CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS CO
ASARCOINC,: •;.
ARIMETCO INTERNATIONAL INC
CYPRUS CLIMAX METAiS CO
MAGMA COPPER CO
CHEMETCO (CONCOftoe MSTAiS)
RECONTEK INC.
NORTH CHICAGO SMELT: i REF:
ESSEX GROUP
COPPER RANGE CO.
WARRENTON REFINING CO
PHELPS DODGE CORP.
ARIMETCO
FRANKLIN SMELTING 1 REFINING
ASARCO INC.
ASARCOINC.
PHELPS DODGE CORP
KENNECOTT :
nspections (2 years)
Air
Total
Av-raga
SaaNola 1
35
1
NP
NP
2
3
NP
NP
3
NP
NP
1
0
1
2
1
1
13
1
2
1
:.::: :W
Water
ToW
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
0.8
0
0
NP
1
0
0
NP
0
0
0
1
0
6
0
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
2
RCRA
ToW
SaaNola 1
2.6
0
NP
NP
0
0
NP
0
1
18
6
2
0
2
0
0
NP
NP
E
:
1
•::::::::0
Total
Avaraga
SaaNotal
5.3
1
0
NP
3
3
0
0
4
ii
6
4
0
10
2
1
1
13
7
7
2
•;:!.. ;.1»
Historical Noncomplance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncomplance
event)
Atr
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
0.5
2
0
NP
1
0
0
0
4
4
0
0
0
fl
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
Watar
AvaTBga
SaaNote!
1.9
0
0
NP
0
0
0
0
0
I
8
2
0
8
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
RCRA
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
3.0
1)
0
NP
1
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
1
5
;:;;;;:;;:;»
A. W, R
Avaraga
SaaNota2
4.0
2
0
NP
2
0
0
a
8
a
a
a
a
8
5
o
0
2
0
2
6
I;;;-:;;;,;::;,;?
Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
«or
poMarts
ovarlml
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
52
0
0
NP
0
0
0
NP
0
S
6
2
0
3
0
NP
NP
Mf>
NP
NP
NP
:::::;:«
• olpoffjtants
ratMatad
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
17.1
13
0
NP
13
0
0
NP
0
18
25
11
0
14
0
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
:::.::!::28
aofraports
ovarkmrt
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
164
0
0
NP
0
0;
0
NP
0
9
8
B
0
13
0
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
:::::,:•««
f of raports
submttad
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
1.077.4
1,820
0
NP
1,794
0
0
NP
0
338
598
649
0
430
0
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
• ian
Significant Noncompience Indicator
Air
Parcanto!
Facittas
SaaNota 1
14.3*
Y
NP
NP
N
N
NP
NP
Y
NP
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
V
N
N
N
;;i;;,;,;H
Watar
Parcant o(
FacitDas
SaaNota 1
48%
N
N
NP
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
N
RCRA
Parcart ot
Faciltjas
SaaNota 1
14.3%
ti
NP
NP
N
N
NP
N
Y
y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
NP
NP
N
N
N
::;;;:;;;N
A*W*R
Avaraga
SaaNota3
0.3
1
0
a
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
a
0
i
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
••••••••• :0
Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years
Air
Avaraga
SaaNotal
0.3
0
NP
NP
0
0
NP
NP
0
NP
NP
D
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
:.-:•:-::
-------
Primary Copper Refineries Data Summary
Table C
Data puled on July 13. 199a from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Rowt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
19
20
21
NAME
CYPRUS CLIMAX MSTALS CO
CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS CO
ARIMETCO
CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS CO
ASARCO INC,
ARIMETCO INTERNATIONAL INC
CYPRUS CUMAX METALS CO.
MAGMA COPPER CO
CHEMETCO (CONCORDE METALS)
RECONTEK INC
NORTH CHICAGO SMELT: 1 R6F.
ESSEX GROUP
COPPER RANGE CO,
WARRENTON REFINING CO
PHELPS DODGE CORP.
ARIMETCO
FRANKLIN SMELTING 1 REFINING
ASARCO INC
ASARCO INC.
PHELPS DODGE CORP.
KENNECOTT
Production
Metnc Tons/Yaw
Average
SM Notes 14 4
173.850
14,000
45.000
425.000
238,000
5.000
16,000
688.000
115,006
1.000
1.000
18.000
68:000
32.000
220,000
11,000
16.000
450,000
115,000
415.000
564.000
TRI Releases
1996- Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
4,431,311
NP
NP
NP
25,936,416
10.311.976
NP
NP
5.649.276
93,089
106
45.260
20.425
fnact
16,168
10,004,160
NP
27,300
447.280
223,636
1,532
9.360,288
TRI Transfers
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
4,859.486
Nf>
NP
W
2,152,660
38.393.98*
NP
HP
10.228,760
6
0
10W2S
1,606.369
Inad
1.051.503
0
NP
0
652.470
13.068.360
6.155
772.300
TRI Releases +
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ production ur»ts
Average
SeeNoles 145
53.3
NC
NC
NC
659
204.6
NC
NC
231
0.7
0.1
145.3
904
NO
334
455
NC
1.7
24
115.6
0.0
18,0
TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
1996 -Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
534
NF-
NP
te>
0
0
NP
NP
0
0
0
0
0
Met
0
0
NP
750
6,060
417
0
250
TRI Releases +
Transfers -
Metals
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
9,222,572
NF-
NP
NP
27,740.048
48,577.*24
NP
NP
15,875.640
93.089
106
145,305
1.626.794
Intel
1,067,691
9,655,01$
NP
26.550
1.050.085
13.24J.8S6
6,937
10.007,024
TRI Production -
Related Waste
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
SMNotel
56.167.294
NF-
NP
NP
509.613.566
103.580.8S4
NP
NP
81.886,528
91.78$
2.646
173,025
28,259,264
load
1,070,273
10,004,180
NP
13,882,5(50
2,209,610
20;035;r92
7,687
9.484,360
Pollutant Soils
Spil Occurrence
Percert of
Facihtjes
238%
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
ast2years)
1 of SPINS
Average
See Note 6
44
J
7
5
1
6
Amourt Spied (ts)
Average
See Note 7
33.224
4704
76,955
13,376
67,000
86
Surrounding
Population
Residents within
3 mites
Average
See Note 1
39,466
3,832
1.587
1.587
4.009
4,968
64,117
1,756
900
5.194
240,043
1.396
42,071
103,744
Note 1 Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2. Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3 Avenge number of programs in which facilties are considered to be in significant noncomplance. (maximum vakje=3)
Note 4 This indicator is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector Automobile Assembly: vehicles/year; Pulp Mils: short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mils short tons/yean Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5 This indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors Average is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfer!
Note 6: Average of those with at least one soil reported.
Note 7 Average of those with a soil amount reported.
NP = no permiulDK identified; NC = value not cafculaled; Inact «Inactive permit/ID*
87
-------
-------
Primary Lead Refineries Location Data
Table A
Data pulled on July 13, 1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
1
2
3
4
NAME
ASARCO INCORPORATED
THE DOE RUN CO.
ASARCO INCORPORATED
ASARCO INCORPORATED
STREET ADDRESS
HWY.49S
881 MAIN ST.
E. OF HELENA-SEC. 36 R
500 DOUGLAS ST.
CITY
GLOVER
HERCULANEUM
EAST HELENA
OMAHA
ST
MO
MO
MT
NE
EPA
RGN
07
07
08
07
89
-------
Primary Lead Refineries Data Summary
Table B
Data puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data tor Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
NAME
ASARCO INCORPORATED
THE DOE RUN CO.
ASARCO INCORPORATED
ASARCO INCORPORATED
Inspections (2 years
Air
ToM
Avorogo
Soo Hotel
25
3
2
2
3
Water
TOW
Avongo
Soo Note 1
0.8
2
0
1
0
RCRA
TOM
Avongo
SooNolol
1.3
3
0
2
0
Total
Avongo
So* Natal
4.5
8
2
5
3
Historical Noncompiance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompliance
event)
Mr
Avongo
SooNolol
1.3
0
0
5
0
WXor
Avongo
Soo Hotel
0.3
1
0
0
0
ROW
Avorogo
SooNolol
1.3
0
0
s
0
A.W, R
Avorogo
So«Holo2
2.3
1
0
8
0
Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act
(2-year data)
• or
poUortl
ovorlml
Avmo.
SooNolol
3.0
6
1
2
0
•of
poMMI
roguloted
Avongo
Soo Hotel
17.8
:13
10
29
19
• orropoHi
ovorln*
Avongo
Soo Halo 1
4.7
11
1
2
0
• ofroportl
submitted
Avongo
SooNolol
347.8
353
34
475
529
Significant Noncompiance Indicator
Ak
Porcorilor
SooNolol
0.0%
N
N
N
N
Woter
PorcortoT
Focnm
SooNolo 1
0.0%
N
N
N
N
RCRA
PonoMoT
F«Mlt>
SooNolol
0.0%
N
N
N1
N
Awngo
SooNolol
0.0
0
0
0
0
Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years
Air
Avongo
SooNolol
0.3
1
0
6
0
Wolor
Avongo
SooNotol
0.3
0
0
1
0
RCRA
Avongo
Soo Noto 1
0.0
0
0
0
0
TOM
Avongo
SooNolo 1
0.5
1
0
1
0
Note 1 Average Is calculated across il entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2 Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3 Average runber of programs In which fadlfles are considered to be In significant noncomplance. (maximum vakie-3)
Note 4: This Indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors The units apply only to a sector: Automobile Assembly: vehicles/year: Pulp Mils: short tons/day: Petroleum Refining: barrels/day: Iron and Steel Mils: short tons/year Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5: This Indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors Average Is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values (or BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 6: Average of those with at least one soil reported.
Note 7: Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP - no permit/ICW identified; NC = value not calculated: Inact - Inactive permWID*
90
-------
Primary Lead Refineries Data Summary
Table C
Data puled on July 13, 199B from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
NAME
ASARCO INCORPORATED
THE DOE RUN CO.
ASARCO INCORPORATED
ASARCO INCORPORATED
Production
Motile Tom/Toor
Avngt
StoNotosll.4
126.305
112.000
229.221
: 82.000
82,000
TRI Releases
1 996 -TOM Pounds
Avorago
SOONOIOI
15,323,960
8,886.646
7.880,312
44;47u:1l2
58,848
TRI Transfers
IMS - TOM Pounds
Avorago
SOONolot
1,468,785
•: : :, :-:::0
997
: 557:861
5,316,460
TRI Releases +
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ production unls
Avorago
SOONOIOI1AS
182,1
:::: : 79*
34,4
::::;:::: : 549;i
65.6
TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
inc. - Total Pounds
Avoraga
SooNolol
5,570
::• 22.278
0
:::::::.: : (j
0
TRI Releases +
Transfers -
Metals
19W - Total Pounds
Avoraga
SooNolat
16,780.879
: :: ::S;864,388
7.881.048
: : 45,di1jtt2
5.366.388
TRI Production -
Related Waste
19M- Tom Pounds
Avoraga
SaaNotal
55.315,356
76.221,066
40.213.248
84,604,768
20.218,352
Potjlant Spils
SpffJ Occurronca
Portontof
FsdtHis
50.0%
:N
Y
N
Y
last 2 years)
• at Spits
Avorago
SooNotoC
2.0
3
1
Amount SpHUd (Hi)
Avor«go
So«Noli7
4.042
4.042
Surrounding
Population
RtsMonls wthlfl
3m«os
Avorago
SooNolol
27,331
622
13,972
S.32S
89,403
Note 1 Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater
Note 2 Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event in any of Die three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs In which tadttes are considered to be in significant noncompiance. (maximum vakje=3)
Note 4 This indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors The units apply only to a sector. Automobile Assembly: vehicles/year; Pulp Mils short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: bairels/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/yeai
Note 5 This Indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors Average is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 6 Average of those with at least one spil reported.
Note 7 Average of Ihose with a spil amount reported
NP = no permit/1 DO identified: NC = value not calculated: Inact = Inactive permit/ID*
91
-------
-------
Primary Zinc Refineries Location Data
Table A
Data pulled on July 13,1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
: :1
2
3
NAME
BIG RIVER ZINC CORP.
ZINC CORPORATION OF AMERICA
SAVAGE ZINC INC.
STREET ADDRESS
ROUTE 3C, MONSANTO AVE.
300 FRANKFORT ROAD
ZINC PtANT RD., BOX 1t04
CITY
SAUGET
MONACA
CLARKSVILLE
ST
IL
PA
TN
EPA
RGN
05
03
04
93
-------
Primary Zinc Refineries Data Summary
Table B
Data puled on July 1 3. 1 998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row* NAME
i HG RIVER ZINC CORP.
2 ZINC CORPORATION OF AMERICA
3 SAVAGE BNC INC.
Inspections (2 years)
Air
Total
Average
See Note 1
23
i
3
1
Water
Total
Average
SeeNote!
2.5
NP
3
2
RCRA
Total
Average
SeeNotel
20
2
4
0
Total
Averege
See Note 1
6.0
5
10
3
Historical NoncompHance (Quarterty Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompHance
event)
Air
Average
See Note 1
2.3
-------
Primary Lead Refineries Data Summary
Table C
Data puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row* NAME
1 BIG RIVER ZINC COUP.
2 ZINC CORPORATION OF AMERICA
3 SAVAGE ZINC INC
Production
Metnc Tons/Year
Average
See Notes 144
109.333
82.000
146,000
100.000
TRI Releases
1996- ToW Pouids
Average
See Note 1
357.580
229,494
485,666
Inact
TRI Transfers
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
SM Natal
12.206.203
•U14.390
23,094,016
Inact
TRt Releases +
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ production units
Average
See Notts 14 S
90.2
1S.S
161.5
NC
TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
SMNott 1
0
«
0
mid
TRI Releases +
Transfers -
Metals
1996 -Tot* Pounds
Avecege
SeeNolel
12.501.552
1.4*5,424
23,579,680
Ired
TRI Production -
Related Waste
1996 -ToM Pounds
Average
See Note 1
12.467.261
1356,106
23,578,416
Ihut
Pokjlant Spills
Soil Occurrence
Percent of
Faciktaes
33.3%
N
Y
N
ast 2 years)
« 01 Soils
Average
See Note 6
1.0
1
Amount Spiled (IK)
Average
See Note T
2.000
2.000
Surrounding
Population
Residents ntthin
Average
S*eNote 1
31.309
64.87*
21,028
B.024
Note 1: Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2: Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs in which fadlttes are considered to be in significant noncomplance. (maximum vatue=3)
Note 4: This indicator is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply onty to a sector: Automobile Assembly: veNdes/year Pulp Mils: short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5: This indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors. Average is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 6 Average of those with it least one spil reported.
Note 7. Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID*4 identified; NC = value not calculated; Inact = inactive permit/IDK
95
-------
-------
Appendix A
HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF SFIP
The Sector Facility Indexing Project arose from the need to examine environmental records and
trends within industry categories. Before beginning SFIP, EPA examined the current status of
facility-level data available to the Agency. This analysis demonstrated a strong need for
improved data integration techniques to allow quick and easy access to important facility
information. Several new analytical methodologies were put in place for EPA's Office of
Compliance Sector Notebook Project (September 1995). Several more improvements are now
made through SFIP, and EPA is planning to follow-up on many issues that have been identified
through this effort. Resolution of these issues will allow EPA to reach its goal of developing a
method to provide detailed facility and sector-based environmental data that is easily accessible
to the public. Step-by-step, EPA is developing better ways to compile this information so that
environmental protection choices can be made based upon the best possible data. Recent efforts
to increase public access and improve data quality are detailed in the four phases presented
below.
Phase 1 - Data Released Under Sector Notebook Project
As a first step, EPA published consolidated compliance, enforcement and chemical release
information for eighteen industrial sectors under the Sector Notebook Project. After two external
review periods, this information was made available publicly in September 1995. Now covering
28 industries, the Sector Notebooks provide aggregate data by sector regarding the
• type and amount of Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) chemicals released and transferred;
• compliance and enforcement history;
• applicable regulations;
• industrial processes descriptions, and technological innovations; and
• industry statistics.
To accurately move from providing aggregate data to facility-level data, extensive research, data
cleansing and quality assurance were necessary. This was done under Phase 2.
Phase 2 - Issuance of Interim 1996 Progress Report for Five Test Sectors
The second step in addressing the issues mentioned above was captured within the October 1996
Interim Progress Report. The 1996 Report focused primarily on presentation of baseline
information at the facility-level for five test sectors: petroleum refining; iron and steel; primary
nonferrous metals smelting and refining; pulp manufacturers; and automobile assembly. The
1996 Report contained facility-level statistics for most of the same indicators as are being used
now. Since that time, several indicators have been revised and others added. The elements EPA
has determined to be important when examining the environmental records of facilities include:
A-l
-------
compliance and inspection history,
TRI chemical information,
on-site pollutant spills,
demographic and geographic data indicating population surrounding each facility, and
facility production or production capacity.
Phase 3 - Public Comment and Data Quality Review
Following the internal review of the 1996 Interim Progress Report, EPA began the process of
soliciting input on the project as a whole and the quality of the data being used in SFIP. For
example, the plans, goals and scope for SFIP were-published in an April 14, 1997 Federal
Register Notice. Soon after, a public meeting was held on May 14, 1997 to obtain input from
industry, state officials, environmental organizations and other interested groups and individuals.
The meeting was followed by a 30-day written comment period. (See Appendix D for a
summary.) Since that time, EPA has continued its discussions regarding the development of
SFIP, the use and utility of particular indicators and the methods of public access. In response to
comments concerning data quality, EPA provided each affected facility with a copy of its
individual environmental records the Agency proposed to include in SFIP. While this data
quality review was voluntary and participation was solely the decision of the individual facilities,
approximately 62% chose to submit comments. During this unparalleled effort, EPA reviewed
all comments received, even those that were submitted after the deadline. A system was put in
place to ensure that all data comments were addressed by EPA in conjunction with the
appropriate state agency. Based upon these comments, EPA and the states modified the data as
appropriate.
Phase 4 - SFIP Reports and Tools for Public Access
The data provided in this Report is a consolidation of very detailed information that goes well
beyond what can be presented in a paper report format. Therefore, EPA has designed a
searchable Internet Website to assist interested users in examining the more detailed information
regarding each facility and to conduct simple analyses of facilities within each sector. The SFIP
Website may also be useful as a tracking system to give EPA, state/local governments, the
regulated community, and the public the ability to monitor the environmental records of each
facility over time. In addition, the SFIP Website allows EPA to collect comments on the utility
and perception of SFIP, as well as any comments regarding problems users may have with this
means of public access to EPA data.
The SFIP Website address is:
http://www.epa.gov/oeca/sfi. |
A-2
-------
Appendix B
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the Sector Facility Indexing Project?
The Sector Facility Indexing Project (SFIP), a pilot program developed by EPA, integrates and
provides public access to more environmental information than has ever before been available to
the public in one location. SFIP profiles approximately 650 facilities in five industrial sectors.
What are the goals of SFIP?
Goals of SFIP include the following:
> to make environmental information about industrial facilities and regulatory compliance
more accessible to the public.
* to expand the comprehensiveness and improve the accuracy of data for analyzing the
environmental track record of an industrial sector.
*• to provide industrial and government stakeholders with better analytical tools for permitting,
reporting, compliance, benchmarking, self-policing, and pollution prevention purposes.
> to help all stakeholders take a more holistic, multi-media approach to environmentally sound
performance.
What industries are included in SFIP?
Five industrial "sectors" were chosen for the pilot stage of SFIP. They are:
> automobile assembly
»• pulp manufacturing
>• petroleum refining
> iron and steel production
>• primary smelting and refining of aluminum, copper, lead, and zinc (nonferrous metals)
How were these industries chosen?
Five criteria were used to select the industries for the pilot phase of SFIP:
1. Be a manufacturing industry—defined as having a primary Standard Industry Classification
(SIC) Code that falls within codes 20 through 39. (For example, the iron and steel sector is
categorized under SIC Code 33—Primary Metal Industries.)
2. Have fewer than 1,000 facilities, so that the size of the pilot project would be manageable.
3. Release relatively high levels of chemicals, because this ensures sufficient data for the pilot
project, and because facilities with greater chemical releases potentfally have a more
significant environmental impact.
4. Use similar processes and products within an industry sector, to facilitate comparisons
between facilities.
5. Have sources of data available for facilities in the sector, to enable SFIP to accurately
identify all facilities and gather all the relevant environmental data for each facility.
B-l
-------
What are the key elements of SFIP?
For each facility, SFIP provides information on its location, production or production capacity,
surrounding population, permits held under major environmental programs, the number of
inspections received, its record of compliance with federal regulations, and any chemical
releases, transfers, and spills. Original facility-specific reports are available in SFIP for viewing
and downloading. However, these raw data are often so detailed and complex as to make it
virtually impossible for a user to compare different facilities, chemicals, or geographic areas. So,
in addition to gathering all this information into one location for the first time, SFIP is unique in
that it structures and aggregates the data so a user can easily view, compare, and analyze
information from different facilities.
What information sources does SFIP use?
SFIP includes compliance and enforcement information submitted to state and federal regulators,
as well as chemical release information submitted under the federal Toxics Release Inventory
(TRI). SFIP also links data submitted to state and federal agencies by facilities regulated under
the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Recovery and Conservation Act, and the
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act. Finally, statistics about the
population around facilities were taken from census reports, and information about production
was gathered from outside sources.
To link all these data, SFIP has used an interactive, high-speed data retrieval and integration
system developed by EPA, called the Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) system.
Are Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) emissions from industrial facilities legal and
permitted?
TRI only affects the reporting of releases and off-site transfers. Just because a chemical is
reported under TRI does not make it illegal. A TRI chemical release may be legal and fully
permitted. In fact, most of the chemicals reported under the TRI program are allowable under
existing single-media permits (i.e., for air, water, or hazardous solid waste) or are unregulated.
Why do some facilities under SFIP have no TRI releases or transfers?
There are several possible reasons why no TRI data are reported, such as:
*• A facility may have been idle during the reporting period.
* A facility may be small and fall under reporting thresholds.
*• A facility may not? have properly filed the necessary data.
What indicators of noncompliance are included in SFIP?
The SFIP uses several indicators, including:
*• historical noncompliance, which indicates the frequency of problems over time.
> significant noncompliance (SNC), which indicates a current major noncompliance
problem or a series of problems.
>• the number of times that a facility has exceeded its Clean Water Act National Pollution
B-2
-------
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) pollution limits.
*• On-site spills of chemicals subject to the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), also known as the Superfund Law. These
spills are reported to the Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS).
How does SFIP indicate the severity and duration of noncompliance problems?
SFIP allows users to dig down into the underlying data to find out more about a violation. For
instance, SFIP provides underlying information about the duration of a problem, such as whether
it extended into more than one quarter. By considering the type and duration of any
noncompliance event in conjunction with other data, SFIP users can draw their own conclusions
about the severity of the problem.
Does the use of "indexing" mean that individual facilities will be ranked?
The term "indexing" describes the process that SFIP uses to identify all facilities and data. The
facilities have not been ranked in any way.
How accurate are SFIP data?
EPA worked for three years to identify the facilities to be included in SFIP, and to collect and
verify the data. Each facility received a copy of its compliance and enforcement data for review,
to make sure that any problems were identified before the information was distributed through
SFIP.
Prior to the industry data review, EPA specifically asked the states to review the data and make
changes as appropriate. Based upon these data reviews, EPA believes that the information in the
underlying databases is generally of high quality. EPA will continue to work with stakeholders
to ensure the greatest possible quality of data in SFIP.
How will EPA ensure that SFIP data continue to be accurate when the data are updated?
The accuracy of the data depends upon reliable reporting by states, local agencies, and industry.
Accuracy also depends upon correct recording of information by regulatory agencies at local,
state, and federal levels. EPA, in conjunction with the affected stakeholders, will continue to
work at improving the quality and consistency of the underlying data. EPA has set up an SFIP
Hotline (617-520-3015) for users to ask questions about the data and has also established a
"comment page" on the SFIP website for users to submit their comments instantly.
Has this information ever been released before?
The information in SFIP has been available to the public directly through different data systems,
publications, and in several places on the Internet. EPA has gathered all this data into one
location, improved the data quality, and made the data easier to work with and understand.
If I work for a facility included in SFIP and suspect that the data need to be corrected,
what should I do?
B-3
-------
A system has been established for making changes to the SFIP data. To report a possible
inaccuracy, users can call the SFIP Hotline at 617-520-3015 and explain their concern. They will
then be directed to the proper individual within EPA. In addition, a "comment page" is located
on the SFIP website for users to instantly submit comments on any aspect of the project,
including concerns with regard to the data.
How can the public and other non-government entities use SFIP?
SFIP enables users to research environmental compliance and chemical releases at individual
facilities. SFIP is especially useful for comparing information about different facilities in a
particular industry; evaluating and comparing chemicals used by an industry, measuring
compliance and chemical release trends over time, identifying common compliance problems and
developing solutions to them, and identifying issues that may warrant further research.
Will SFIP affect the way companies in these industry sectors conduct business?
EPA is hopeful that SFIP will create an additional "compliance incentive" for companies. SFIP
may lead to collaborative efforts between EPA and industry to design compliance assistance
programs. It also may assist states and facilities in taking a more holistic, multimedia perspective
about their business, and may help them to identify pollution prevention opportunities. In
addition, as companies increasingly look to make exemplary environmental records known, SFIP
will provide a platform for those that demonstrate a commitment to the environment, and may
help to identify high-performing facilities that can be recognized publicly.
If I am interested in records for facilities in other sectors, where can I obtain information?
EPA is developing procedures for providing information on additional facilities in the future.
Meanwhile, you can contact EPA or your state/local environmental agency to request specific
facility information.
In what forms are the SFIP data available?
SFIP is available online for use by the general public. The SFIP Internet address is as follows:
http://www.epa.gov/oeca/sfi |
Anyone who wishes to use SFIP online should read the introductory information carefully before
proceeding.
Documentation can be obtained by calling the SFIP Hotline at 617-520-3015.
B-4
-------
Appendix C
PROJECT DESIGN/RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A. Selection of Sectors for the Sector Indexing Project
EPA used the following criteria to choose the sectors included in this pilot project:
• the sector must fall within manufacturing Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
codes 20-39;
• the sector must have a small number of facilities (under 1,000);
facilities must have high relative pollutant output per facility;
• facilities must have relatively similar processes and products; and
• the sectors must have several comparative sources of facility data.
Based on these criteria, the petroleum refining, automobile assembly, pulp manufacturing, iron
and steel production, and primary nonferrous metals (aluminum, copper, lead, zinc) sectors were
selected. The criteria used allowed EPA to focus on industries that were of manageable size, had
similar processes and were of importance to the Agency from a pollutant release perspective.
The 1995 White House Reinventing Environmental Protection Report specifically asked EPA to
focus on a total of five sectors.
B. Explanation of Indexing, Permit Linkages and Sector Universe Definition
Once the five sectors were chosen, the next step was to identify which facilities were operating
within each sector. The following sequential steps were taken to index each sector. "Indexing"
refers to the process used to identify facilities and then find and "link" the appropriate
permits and data records associated with each facility. Indexing allows EPA to provide
detailed information for each facility based upon the underlying data associated with each permit.
Step 1: Develop "Master List" of Facilities This step included:
• defining the scope of each sector for purposes of this study,
• researching the best available facility lists from a wide range of EPA and non-
EPA data sources, and
• consolidating the lists to develop a "master list" of facilities to be used as the basis
of subsequent facility-based analyses.
C-l
-------
In general, EPA concluded that there is often no single listing of facilities that serves as the sole
data source for a given industry. In most instances, it is necessary to canvas available industry-
specific resources, evaluate the relative strengths and weaknesses of each list, and develop a
hybrid list. The following data sources were used to develop the master list for each sector.
Petroleum Refining: Department of Energy list of active petroleum refineries. U.S.
Refining Capacity, January 1, 1995.
Automobile Assembly: The universe of facilities engaged in automobile and light truck
assembly was taken from a list of such facilities provided by industrial trade associations
to the EPA Common Sense Initiative (CSI) workgroup. The universe includes 58
facilities, two of which are operated jointly. The list includes all domestic manufacturing
plants, regardless of ownership. It was reviewed by industry CSI participants and trade
associations. Please note that the automobile assembly index does not include the
extensive universe of automotive parts manufacturers and suppliers since these facilities
are fundamentally different operations.
Pulp Manufacturing: Lockwood-Post Directory (privately developed data). The
resulting universe includes 247 facilities that were flagged in the Lockwood-Post
Directory as having pulp-making capacity.'
Iron and Steel Production: Industrial trade association membership directory of iron
and steel plants (Iron and Steel Directory and Steel Manufacturers Association
Membership Directory); EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) list
of integrated facilities; trade publication of minimills (33 Metals Producing magazine). If
a facility was identified by the directories as having a furnace (basic oxygen or electric arc
furnace) or as being involved in cokemaking, it was included on the master list. Since
there are fundamental differences between each operation, the complete iron and steel list
is then sorted into two sub-sectors: integrated mills (cokemaking and basic oxygen
furnace); and mini-mills (electric arc furnace). Facility-specific furnace and cokemaking
information (and production capacity information) were added from a list of integrated
steel mills provided by OAQPS and from a list of mini-mills from 33 Metal Producing
magazine. A total of 118 mills were identified as having a steel-making furnace or coke-
making capacity.
Primary Nonferrous Metal Refining and Smelting: OAQPS list of primary smelting
operations; Bureau of Mines list of primary smelting and refining operations. The Sector
Facility Indexing Project included data on four primary lead smelters, 23 primary
aluminum smelters, 21 copper smelters and/or refineries, and three zinc smelters.
'Facilities engaged in pulp making (including, but not limited to: pulping from virgin wood fiber,
defibrating, paper recycling with deinking) were included in this analysis. Some such facilities are also involved in
paper making, paperboard and/or non-paper production lines.
C-2
-------
Secondary smelters (that refine from previously manufactured scraps) are not included in
this analysis.
Selection Criteria for Including Facilities. The decision to include a facility within SFIP was
determined based upon whether the facility operated the key process equipment that defines each
given industry. For example, the existence of a either a basic oxygen furnace or an electric arc
furnace was a precondition for being included in the iron and steel index. The determination as
to whether the defined preconditions were met were based upon available sector-specific data
within the sources listed above. This was done to strengthen the ability to compare facilities
within each sector based upon the similarity of their processes and products. If EPA was not able
to positively make a determination as to whether the industrial process was a minor part of the
facility's operation, the facility was kept on the master list. The determinations made regarding
whether facilities were included or not included were made for purposes of this project only, and
do not reflect any decisions regarding regulatory definitions within single-media programs.
Inclusion of Permits from other Industrial Processes. The definition of "facility" needed to be
examined in deciding what data records should be included in a facility's profile. Once the
decision was made as to whether the facility was on the master list, EPA needed to decide what
records should be included in situations when multiple operations were being conducted at a
facility. When the data indicated that there were several processes occurring at the same location
or nearby (e.g., a pulp mill and a chemical plant), EPA had to make the decision as to whether
the complete records of all operations should be included, or whether only the operations
pertaining to the relevant sector should to be included. Under the "facility approach" it is
important that all records at a single facility are kept together to ensure that EPA knows what is
happening at the facility. This allows EPA to perform data screening that examines all portions
of the facility. However, under the "sector approach," it is more appropriate that records are
analyzed based upon the industrial processes that are being examined. This strengthens that
ability to form comparisons across facilities.
For the purpose of this pilot project, the following approach was used. Using the examples listed
above, where the pulp mill is co-located with a chemical plant, EPA did not include the records
associated with the chemical plant, which was not in the scope of SFIP. This approach was taken
to strengthen the comparability of records across facilities within the same sector. In some
instances, facilities may have permits that cover all industrial processes at the site. In this
situation, EPA is unable to identify and break apart environmental records by industrial process.
For example, the SFIP includes TRI submissions for all establishments within a facility. EPA
also identified cases, however, in which processes within a given facility had been split apart
when the information was submitted to EPA. If the processes split apart were deemed to be
essential processes associated with the given sector, the records were consolidated together. It is
important to note that the issue of multiple operations arose in a relatively small percentage of
facilities examined under this project.
C-3
-------
Step 2: Sector Facility Indexing/Linking The following steps were designed to ensure that
each facility on the "Master List" had complete permit linkages, i.e., a listing of all permits and
data records associated with a given facility. Correct permit linkages allow EPA to overcome the
great majority of data problems that have previously hampered multimedia and sector data
analysis efforts. Three separate automated systems were used to identify permits: 1) Facility
Indexing System (FINDS) linkage, 2) Dun and Bradstreet linkage, and 3) TRI linkage. Each of
these linkages were used to identify possible permits under core EPA programs - the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and the Toxics Release
Inventory. The list of permits from all three systems were then manually reviewed, and incorrect
linkages were taken out. In some instances these linkages did not identify permits under some
regulatory programs. When this occurred, EPA performed an "orphan" search which consisted
of a series of manual name and location database queries to find the permits that were missing.
This was done based on the assumption that the overwhelming majority of facilities within the
five sectors profiled are expected to have permits or records for each of the four major programs
examined. The index was then reviewed by EPA regional offices, and the facilities themselves,
to verify that the linkage information was correct. As new information becomes available and
facilities change ownership or permits, EPA plans to continue updating the indices.
C-4
-------
Appendix D
SFIP COMMENT AND DATA REVIEW PROCESS
EPA is committed to affording all stakeholders an opportunity to comment formally on SFIP in
its entirety, as well as to review the project's underlying data. Therefore, from the onset of this
project, the Agency embarked upon an extensive review and outreach process.
In the fall of 1996, EPA solicited each state environmental commissioner for comment and
assistance on the project while also providing the states the opportunity to review the data during
a combined EPA regional/state review period that was conducted from November 1, 1996
through February 28, 1997. Prior to SFIP, EPA had never before done this level of research
regarding the multimedia records of individual facilities and the Agency believed it was
necessary that such a review take place. Thus, in verifying or correcting the data, the EPA
Regions were asked to consult with the states and work closely with them, particularly with
regard to the data that had been previously submitted by the states themselves. The Agency
regarded this collaboration as an important process to ensure that the facility-specific compliance
and enforcement data is accurately reported to the public. Most of the comments raised by the
states participating in the review were relatively minor and were resolved through the
coordinated EPA-state effort.
Public Comment
On May 14, 1997, EPA held a day long public meeting, during which private citizens, industry,
environmental organizations, as well as the states were invited to comment on the overall
purpose and methodology used in the project. They were also invited to provide alternative ways
of analyzing and presenting the data. Following the public meeting, EPA held a one-month
written comment period to accommodate those that could not provide comments in person. All
comments were submitted to the SFIP Docket (Administrative Record 178) which was
established to provide a public record of this project and allow for inspection of all relevant
materials by interested parties. These comments were reviewed and further analyzed by EPA.
Since much of the data was originally submitted by the states, further efforts to obtain state
involvement in the project were undertaken. EPA met with the Director of the Environmental
Council of the States (ECOS). EPA also addressed several meetings of ECOS to ensure that the
states were heard and represented on this project.
Understanding that the states are critical in helping EPA provide quality data and in making SFIP
a success, EPA also held two meetings in early 1998 with ECOS, specifically on SFIP. The
meetings were arranged in order to provide the states with a better understanding of the goals and
purpose of SFIP, as well as to discuss any concerns or suggestions the states had with regard to
this project. The meetings were both beneficial and productive allowing for collaboration with
the states and an ongoing discussion of the issues.
D-l
-------
Oral and written statements made by several commenters, including state and industry
representatives, urged the Agency to provide the affected facilities an opportunity to review the
underlying compliance and enforcement data before the data were published. In response to
these comments, EPA, in August 1997, provided each affected facility with a copy of the
individual environmental records the Agency proposed to include in SFIP. While this data
quality review was voluntary and participation was solely at the discretion of the individual
facilities, approximately 62 percent chose to submit comments.
Concurrent with the direct mailing to each facility covered by SFIP, EPA established a hotline to
answer any questions facilities may have had concerning their data or the review in general. We
received numerous calls on the hotline and provided assistance to those who called throughout
the review period. During this unparalleled effort, we catalogued and tracked all comments
submitted, even those sent in after the deadline. This tracking enabled the Agency to ensure that
all data comments were addressed by EPA in conjunction with the appropriate state agency.
Based upon these comments, EPA modified the data as appropriate.
Summary of Data Quality Assurance Review
Two-thirds of the SFIP facilities submitted comments as part of the quality assurance review
which was open from August through October 1997. A small number of comments have been
received and processed since the October deadline. The review categorized data elements into
two categories: major elements, which include linked permits, enforcement actions and facility
compliance status; and minor elements, which include facility name, address and date of
inspection. Approximately 37,000 major data elements were presented to the facilities that
submitted comments. Comments were received on 3,400 data elements. Of those, EPA and the
state governments agreed that changes were appropriate in 1,700 cases. Comments were
received on approximately 1,000 of the 19,000 minor data elements presented. Of those, EPA
and the state governments agreed that changes were appropriate in 500 cases.
• Permit Linkages => Permits of several co-located operations (e.g., TRI submissions for
on-site energy production, sawmills) were sent to the facilities for their comment rather
than have SFIP make the call about appropriate linking. Facilities commented on 211 of
the 1,790 total permit linkages presented for review. Of these comments, 158 were
accepted.
• Enforcement Actions => Facilities commented on 64 of the 376 enforcement actions
presented. Of these comments, 41 were accepted. Facilities identified another 20 actions
not listed, ten of which have been accepted.
• Significant Noncompliance (SNC) Status => Facilities commented on 103 of the 1,292
eligible data elements. Of these comments, 90 were accepted.
• Quarterly Compliance Status => Facilities commented on approximately 3,000 of the
30,000 quarters of historical compliance status presented for review. Of those, comments
D-2
-------
were accepted on approximately 2,400 quarters. Note: These values represent an average
of the number of quarters presented and commented upon since comments were not
coded separately for all eight quarters.
• Inspections => Facilities commented on 75 of the 3,761 inspections presented. Of these
comments, 31 were accepted. Another 241 inspections were identified, of which 88 have
been accepted.
Science Advisory Board Review
Consistent with existing projects already distributed to the public by the Agency, EPA plans to
add information on the toxicity of individual chemicals to SFIP in the future. A weighting
system was proposed for use in SFIP based upon prior stakeholder comments that known
chemical toxicity data should be used to distinguish chemicals of high hazard from chemicals of
lower hazard. EPA also indicated in public SFIP documents that the long-term goal of the
project is to incorporate relative risk-based information, but that a toxicity weighting approach
would be used as an interim step until a viable relative risk model is ready. Toxicity weighting
allows users to examine where potential hazards may be without respect to whether population
may be affected. Relative risk-based analysis examines the interaction between chemical
releases, toxicity, weather patterns, chemical dispersion properties, and surrounding populations.
Consistent with public comment, SFIP will pursue for future iterations incorporation of both
toxicity and risk-based analysis, and is pursuing the use of the TRI Relative Risk-based
Environmental Indicators Model being developed by the EPA Office of Prevention, Pesticides,
and Toxic Substances.
Given the important relationship between risk and toxicity-weighted scoring, EPA has decided
for this pilot release of SFIP not to use facility-specific toxicity-weightings independently from
the risk-based methodologies that are under development. EPA agrees with the SAB that the
scientific underpinnings of the toxicity weightings are sound and will continue to pursue its
efforts toward communicating hazard and risk information in the future.
D-3
-------