United States
Environmental Protection
Agency	
Office of Enforcement
and Compliance Assurance
(2223A)	
EPA305R98002
July 1998
Sector Facility Indexing  Project
Progress  Report:  July 1998

-------
                 UNITED-STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
                                                                              OFFICE OF
Message from the Assistant Administrator
       Our nation has made tremendous progress in protecting public health and our
environment in the 25 years since the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was created. In
order to continue this progress, we are moving beyond the single media or pollutant-by-pollutant
approaches of the past to comprehensive, facility- wide approaches for the future. It is our goal to
build a new generation pf environmental protection, utilizing communities, environmental
groups, industry, and state and local agencies as full partners in this endeavor.

       EPA's pilot Sector Facility Indexing Project (SFIP) was undertaken as one of several
efforts to achieve this goal. It brings together more information than has ever before been
available to the public in one location, providing the most complete picture of the environmental
compliance records of facilities in the five industry sectors that have been profiled to date. SFIP
makes it possible for anyone to easily find and compare information on the environmental track
record of many industrial facilities by accessing an Internet site or via written report summaries
for those without Internet access.

       The project provides information on U.S. facilities in five industry sectors: automobile
assembly, pulp manufacturing, petroleum refining, iron and steel production, and the primary
smelting and refining of aluminum, copper, lead, and zinc (nonferrous metals).  The SFIP
integrates data that these industrial facilities must supply to government because of existing
statutory and regulatory requirements. In addition, SFIP includes information about the size of
the facilities, the demographics of the surrounding  population, and information on federal and
state oversight activities such as inspections and enforcement actions.

       We are confident that this project will prove beneficial in many ways. For example,
government agencies can use the information as a planning tool. Facilities can benchmark their
data against those of other facilities, or simply monitor their own regulatory performance.
Environmental and community groups can  use SFIP to learn about the environmental
performance of individual facilities.

       I encourage you to use this information and provide us with comments. Lessons learned
from this project may allow for easier access in the future to information about other sectors and
an expansion of the information that is tracked.  Together we can proceed toward ensuring that
everyone has easy access to important information relevant to the protection of our health and
environment.
                             Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov
           Recycled/Recyclable . Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 20% Postconsumer)

-------
                               TABLE OF CONTENTS




                                                                          Page









Chapter One: Introduction and Overview	1




Chapter Two: Presentation of Results for Sectors	7




Chapter Three: Description of Data Indicators  	19




Chapter Four: Facility Level Data Tables 	37






       Appendix A:  Historical Overview of SFIP




       Appendix B:  Frequently Asked Questions




       Appendix C:  Project Design/Research Methodology




       Appendix D: SFIP Comment and Data Review Process

-------
  CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
  The Sector Facility Indexing Project (SFIP) is a pilot project that makes it easier for the public to
  access a wide range of environmental information about regulated facilities. In the past, these
  records, although public, were very difficult for government and public users to access because
  they were spread across many different databases. Under SFIP, the U.S. Environmental
  Protection Agency (EPA) has integrated this information so that it can be viewed in one place,
  and can be used to better understand overall facility environmental records. SFIP, in its current
  pilot stage, will allow EPA to gauge the level of public interest in examining records regarding
  government oversight of regulated facilities, facility compliance with environmental laws, and
  the overall pollutant releases that are reported. SFIP currently contains records for five industry
  sectors that consist of a total of 653 facilities.

  EPA anticipates that SFIP will provide better public access to facility environmental records. It
  also will further the dialogue between regulated businesses, their surrounding communities, and
  state, local and federal governments. SFIP will assist the public  in examining and comparing
  records of individual facilities in nearby
  communities, will assist businesses and
  corporations in tracking their own performance,
  and also will be a useful planning and analytical
  tool for governments. While SFIP examines only
  a limited number of facilities, the project will be
  used to understand what data are important to
  the public  so that access to a greater number of
    SFIP Examines Five Industries
           •Petroleum Refining
           •Iron and Steel Production
           •Primary Nonferrous Metals
           •Pulp Manufacturing
           •Automobile Assembly
 Goals of SFIP
        •Provide greater public access to
        compliance and facility-level
        information
        •Improve multimedia facility
        profiling and sector-based analysis
        •Provide industry with increased
        ability to design self-policing and
        compliance assistance programs
        •Develop analytical tool for
        government to access compliance
        patterns and determine where to place
        scarce resources
i	
facility records can be provided in the future.
This approach also will allow EPA to study the
impact of public access on environmental
performance by regulated facilities. EPA
anticipates that improved public access to data
will provide an additional incentive for
companies to maintain exemplary
environmental records, and may encourage
some companies to improve their performance
and solve existing problems without
government intervention.

The SFIP Progress Report is a publication that
provides aggregated, pre-formatted information.
The SFIP Website is designed as an interactive

-------
tool that will allow users to customize the information and delve into greater detail to look at
information that is too voluminous to include in the Report version. The Website platform will
also allow EPA to provide more frequent updates than the hard copy version. The address for the
Website is:
                          http://www.epa.gov/oeca/sfi.                          |
Overview of Data Presented in SFIP

EPA presents several categories of information. The inspection, compliance, and enforcement
data focus on three important environmental statutes: the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (which regulates the disposal of solid and hazardous
wastes). In most instances, EPA delegates administration of these laws to state and local
governments who in turn report their activities into national data systems. While EPA Regional
Offices do enter some data directly, the sources of most inspection, compliance and enforcement
data presented within this project is from state governments and their local government partners.
When assessing the compliance status of individual facilities, government inspections and/or data
reported directly by facilities are used by states and EPA to determine whether these facilities are
in compliance with environmental laws.  These determinations are then logged into federal
databases (see summary below).

In situations when government sanctions are necessary, EPA and state/local enforcement actions
may be taken and penalties assessed. These enforcement activities and penalties are then entered
into the databases. In addition to basic compliance and enforcement data, SFIP also provides
information reported by facilities regarding the amount of chemicals released and transferred
during plant operations, incidents in which chemical spills were reported, and overall facility
production levels.  SFIP also provides demographic information, such as the estimated number of
people living nearby, and the education and income levels of the surrounding population. The
information contained within SFIP is organized by industry sector so that users can view
facility-level information in relation to other facilities that make similar products. Users cannot
assume that all facilities within a sector are exactly the same — they are not.  However, the close
similarities across facilities within each sector do allow some degree of comparison.

-------
  Regulatory Program Data Contained within SFIP

  1.      Clean Air Act (CAA) Facilities releasing air pollutants that are subject to CAA
         requirements are inspected to ensure that established permit levels and regulated
         operating procedures are being followed. The result of these inspections, and other
         self-reports that are provided determine the compliance status of each facility.

  2.      Clean Water Act (CWA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Program (NPDESI
         Facilities self-report whether they are above or below pollution discharge limits that are
         established at each facility based upon government-established permit limits. These
         reports, along with the results of periodic government inspections, determine whether
         facilities are considered in or out of compliance.

  3.      Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA^) - Facilities that generate and
         manage hazardous wastes are required to meet established regulations regarding
         storage, transport and disposal. Compliance with these requirements is ascertained by
         government inspections and file reviews. The result of these compliance monitoring
         activities determine the compliance status of each facility.
"Indicators" Contained within SFIP

Inspection Data -Presents the number of state/local and federal inspections that have occurred at
   each facility examined under the project.

Noncompliance Data - Three levels of noncompliance data are reported for each facility.

   a. Historical Noncompliance -This indicator provides information regarding whether
   facilities were considered in noncompliance during any of the eight quarterly periods over the
   last two years. This measure indicates whether violations were detected, but does not indicate
   the severity of the violations. Background data are available through SFIP in the detailed
   facility reports; such data provide more information regarding the actual problems that
   occurred. This indicator is most useful in assessing whether there are historical patterns of
   compliance or noncompliance at facilities.

   b. Current Significant Noncompliance - This indicator provides the most recent status for the
   facility in regard to whether more severe noncompliance has been detected.  This indicator
   does not provide an historical measure, but is designed to capture current noncompliance
   events that are considered important by regulatory agencies.

   c. Discharges Over Permitted Limits -This indicator, which is only available for the Clean
   Water Act, provides the user with information regarding the number of times facilities report
   their water discharges, and how often these discharges are over permitted levels.

-------
Enforcement Data - This indicator shows whether administrative enforcement actions or
   civil/judicial enforcement actions have been taken against each facility for violating
   environmental laws. Background information available through SFIP also provides more
   details regarding the nature of each action, and any associated penalties.

Chemical Release Data

   a. Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Data - Facilities meeting reporting thresholds are required
   to annually self-report the amount of chemicals released to the environment, and any that are
   transferred off-site. This information is provided for each reporting facility. It is not a
   measure of compliance as the reported releases are typically permissible under current laws.

   b. Spills Reported to the Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) -Facilities are
   required to report spills or accidental releases that are not a part of normal operations. The
   SFIP indicator shows whether a spill has been reported during the last two years. More
   detailed background information is available through  SFIP in the detailed facility report for
   ERNS which includes: when each spill occurred, what chemical or mixture was released, and
   the approximate amount released.

Production Data - Information regarding the production capacity is provided for each facility as
   an indicator of the overall production and a surrogate  for size and complexity of the facility's
   operations.

Demographic Data - Estimates of the population living in the surrounding three miles are
   provided through SFIP in the facility-level statistics. In addition, the detailed facility report
   provides more detailed demographic data (e.g., racial  mix, education status and income
   level).
Process Used to Develop SFIP and Assure Quality Data

The EPA initiated SFIP in early 1995 by first researching the facilities that fall into each industry
category. These lists were then used to develop an automated system to bring together the core
data elements that EPA thought were most important with regard to facility profiling.  Once this
list was developed in October 1996, EPA provided each state government with a copy of the
profiles for each facility in their state.  This information was provided to get feedback from state
governments, and to provide an oppoitunity for correction of any data errors that may have
occurred during the data entry process. After this process was completed, EPA announced a
public meeting and comment period in the Federal Register to solicit comments on the project
design. The public meeting, held in May 1997, brought together a wide range of stakeholders.
EPA made substantial modifications to the project to better align it with the needs expressed
during this meeting, and the reviews by state/local governments.

-------
Before releasing this report, EPA took                   .        .
    ,,  ,  .   .        ^,     ,..   ,.         • 37,000 major data elements, such as linked
one final step to ensure the quality of           .     ,     ,.                         , ,.
.,  . f     ,.    c  u f  -r+        A     permits and compliance status, were presented for
the information. Each facility covered     r.    .,,,.,..    _                ,   •   ,
   ,   ...     .  .        .         ,,       review by the facilities. Comments were submitted
under this project was sent a copy of            .... J ^.ff,     ,-,„.    , ,,    . .
                                        on 3,400. Of those, EPA and the state governments
                                            '
       ,    ,                  .    .     .  , _. _
agreed that changes were appropnatem only 1,700
                         ^  r
,,  .       ,.       j   r       * j  *
their compliance and enforcement data
,,     .       ,               ,
for review and comment to make sure
mistakes were caught before the                i«AnA      j *  i     *     u          j
information was released under SFIP.         '  19'000 mmOr ^elements, such as name and
While this process revealed that the        ^ddress' were Presef ed
.  f    ..       * •  j-     uj*u        Comments were submitted on 1,000. Of those,
information contained in each database     TO*   , ,                        , ,    ,
          „   f,- ,    ,..   ,,           EPA and the state governments agreed that changes
was generally of high quality, the                      .    .6 „.        ^^            6
        ,.,     ,,  .             ...     were appropnate in 500 cases.
process did result in some corrections to
the underlying databases. EPA has also
developed procedures so that facilities (or anyone else) that believe that there are errors in the
data presented can bring those to EPA's attention. EPA will work to address these in a timely
manner.

Next Steps and Possible Project Modifications

EPA plans to evaluate the results of the SFIP pilot release as part of its own internal evaluation of
SFIP. This evaluation will assist the Agency in making decisions on future modifications to the
project. SFIP is considered an iterative process in which improvements will be made over time.
EPA will be seeking feedback on project and data quality from users and the regulated
community. There are several project enhancements and modifications that EPA will be
considering after SFIP has been released. These are summarized below.

Improvements to EPA 's Facility Profiling

As the Indexing project moves forward, the next challenges facing EPA are:
    •   developing a standardized methodology to expand to additional sectors;
    •   presenting information over time for comparison purposes;
    •   including compliance data from additional regulatory programs;
    •   factoring in chemical releases reported outside the Toxics Release Inventory (e.g.,
       regulated air pollutants and water discharges under the Clean Water Act permit system);
    •   including facility-specific toxicity-weighted TRI release and relative risk data; and
    •   indicating whether facilities are on "compliance schedules" in which facilities agree to a
       set schedule to fix compliance problems.

Through the Indexing Project, EPA hopes to test these new methodologies for several defined
sectors and eventually provide reports for more industries.

-------
Providing Comments on SFIP

EPA is interested in learning from the wide range of SFIP users. Anyone wishing to submit
comments on any aspect of the project is invited to do so. The SFIP Hotline is open from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m. (EST). The telephone number is (617) 520-3015. Written comments can be mailed to:
j SFIP
! U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
! (2223A)
j 401 M Street, SW
j Washington, DC 20460
In addition, the SFIP Website allows users to
easily prepare and submit comments. The
SFIP Website address is:
http://www.epa.gov/oeca/sfi.
In the later part of 1997, each facility was given an opportunity to comment on the compliance
information available via this website.  With the passage of time since that review period, the
older information has been dropped from SFIP and the more recent information incorporated into
the project so that the user has access to the most current two years of data. As a result, the last
two quarters of data in the AFS and RCRIS programs (after July 1997), plus the last three
quarters of data in the PCS program (after April 1997) have not been reviewed by the individual
facilities.  Therefore, for the initial launch of SFIP, facility representatives are invited to submit
proposed changes to these data by calling the SFIP Hotline and to post summary comments
concerning any perceived errors in these most recent quarters of compliance data. As with any
user, facility representatives can submit comments to the Hotline,  via the comment form on the
Website or in writing to the address above.  In addition, individuals representing an SFIP facility
wishing to post a summary comment on the SFIP Website regarding the most recent quarters of
compliance information which they did not previously review can do so by following the same
procedure as described above. Contact information, such as name and telephone number, is
required for verification purposes, but this information will not be posted in the Facility
Comment Log. To get further information on your facility records or to submit proposed
changes for the most recent quarters, the facility should contact the SFIP Hotline.

-------
CHAPTER Two: PRESENTATION OF RESULTS FOR SFIP SECTORS
CROSS-SECTOR COMPARISON

This page presents summary statistics, by sector, for a number of key indicators used in SFIP.
Cross-sector comparisons can be made for the limited number of indicators presented in this
overview. The Data Access page also allows users to examine a wider number of indicators
within a particular sector as well as individual facility records. EPA used the following criteria to
choose the sectors included in this project:
          / the sectors must fall within manufacturing SIC codes (SIC 20-39)
          S the sectors must have a small number of facilities (under 1,000)
          /     facilities must have high relative pollutant output per facility
          /     facilities must have relatively similar processes and products
          /     the sectors must have several comparative sources of facility data
The five sectors selected for
inclusion in this initial
phase of SFIP are listed in
the box along with the
number of facilities in each
sector. Two of the sectors
(Iron and Steel Production
and Nonferrous Metal
Smelting and Refining)
have subsectors.
SFIP Sectors and Subsectors
   •  Automobile Assembly (58 facilities)
   •  Pulp Manufacture (247 facilities)
   •  Petroleum Refining (179 facilities)
   •  Iron and Steel Production
          Integrated Mills (25 facilities)
          Minimills (91 facilities)
   •  Primary Nonferrous Metal Smelting and Refining
          Aluminum (23 facilities)
          Copper (21 facilities)
          Lead (4 facilities)
          Zinc (3 facilities)
The following maps show the distribution of facilities within each of the five SFIP sectors.

-------
   AUTOMOBILE ASSEMBLY
•RON AND STEEL PRODUCTION
PRIMARY NONFERROUS METALS
   PETROLEUM REFINING
                  PULP MANUFACTURING
               •v ^-t  I

-------
Sector Analyses

The SFIP indicators are compiled and generated primarily from EPA's Integrated Data for
Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) system. This system provides the capability to integrate separate
EPA databases for the purpose of providing information across many regulatory programs. To
make the proper connections across data systems using different facility identifiers, complicated
automated and manual data reconciliation necessitated that the work under SFIP be constrained
to a defined number of data systems. Consequently, SFIP currently focuses primarily on EPA
data relating to the air, water, hazardous/solid waste statutes, and the Toxics Release Inventory
program. There are a number of other federal statutory requirements which are not included in
the compliance history of the facilities covered by this project. These  include, for example,
requirements under Superfund (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act) and the Safe Drinking Water Act. To the extent possible,  SFIP will incorporate
other important data from other programs in the future.

The following pages present  an overview of the major SFIP indicators for the five industry
sectors. The graphs break out two subsectors within Iron and Steel Production and the two
largest Nonferrous Metal Smelting and Refining subsectors (Aluminum  and Copper). The
nonferrous metal subsectors with the fewest facilities (Lead and Zinc), which together only have
seven facilities. Sector averages in these two subsectors would not be comparable to the
subsectors with a larger number of facilities and are, therefore, not presented in the following
overview. The selected indicators have been used by EPA, industry, and other groups to:  1)
assess the performance of the industry sectors; 2) assess the performance and efforts of oversight
agencies and programs; and 3) to create a benchmark for comparisons  (across facilities, across
sectors or within sectors over time).  The major data indicators used in this SFIP overview
include:

  •    Inspections;
  •    Closed Enforcement Actions/Penalties;
  •    Current Significant Noncompliance;
  •    Historical Noncompliance;
  •    Chemical Releases and Transfers; and
       Spills.

The SFIP web site allows users to  run customized queries of all SFIP indicators, as well as to
look up detailed facility information.

In most cases, the compliance and enforcement indicators cover the most recent two years for
which data are available. However, the significant noncompliance status is only maintained for
the most recent quarter in the underlying data system.  The most recent year for which TRI
chemical release and transfer information is available is for calendar year 1996. For
comparability, production or capacity is for that same year, where possible.

It is important to understand  that the indicators presented above summarize but a fraction of the
information maintained on all program and permit requirements that are  available in the
underlying water,  air, hazardous waste and other data systems. These overviews give readers a

-------
very general picture of the SFIP sectors; sector overviews are built up from very detailed
information tracked at the facility or permit level. Anyone with Internet access and browser
software can use the data on the SFIP website in a number of different ways. From the SFIP
Data Access page, users can view and analyze the underlying permit information, as well as
details regarding demographics of the surrounding population and chemical releases.

Inspections

This indicator shows the overall inspection presence by environmental regulatory agencies.
Inspections are conducted under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by federal, state and local governments. The
number of inspections presented below include all identified federal and state/local inspections
under the CAA, CWA and RCRA that have occurred over the past two years.  State and local
agencies conduct the majority of the inspections since they have been delegated the responsibility
for these programs.

Findings:
  •    Over the past two years, there were significantly more CAA inspections (1,865) than
       CWA (1,262) or RCRA (1,026) inspections.
  •    Integrated Iron and Steel facilities received the most inspections (21.2
       inspections/facility/year); 3-6 times that of other sectors. Auto Assembly operations (3.1
       inspections/facility/year) received the fewest inspections.
  •    In the past two years, 92 percent of the SFIP facilities were inspected in at least one
       program area.
                             Inspections per Year
                            I Air    B Water    gRCRA i
                            Industry Sector (# of facilities)
                                           10

-------
Closed Enforcement Actions

This indicator provides the number of closed federal and state/local enforcement actions that
have been entered into federal data systems for each facility over the past two years. Only closed
enforcement actions under the Clean Air Act (AIRS data system), Clean Water Act (PCS data
system), and RCRA (RCRIS data system) are included. It is also limited to civil, administrative
and judicial actions and does not include any criminal actions that might have been taken. When
examining the detailed facility data, users can obtain a breakdown by each particular statute, and
retrieve supporting data on the date, type of action, and penalty amount.

Findings:
  •     In the past two years, 570 enforcement actions have been taken against 247 of the 651
       SFIP facilities.
  •     404 of the 651 SFIP facilities (360 of which were inspected during this time) have had no
       enforcement actions closed in the last two years.
  •     Enforcement actions under CAA (330) account for approximately 60 percent of all
       enforcement actions (CWA=133 and RCRA-107).
               Closed  Enforcement Actions per Year
                                | Air • Water o RCRA
   v>
   o
   <
   u
   o
   «•-
   c
   UJ
   •o
   tt
   (A
   £
   O
      100
                       Industry Sector (# of facilities)
                                         11

-------
Current Significant Noncompliance Status

Current Significant Noncompliance Status provides an indication of whether non-compliance at a
given facility is of greater concern to EPA or the state/local agencies. SNC is defined by each of the
major programs based upon their statutory and regulatory authority. Definitions can be found in the
SFIP Indicators document.

Findings:
The percentage of eligible facilities in each sector (those holding major permits -- with significant
regulatory requirements) in SNC varies widely across the media programs.
  •    Designation as SNC occurs most often in the CAA program.
  •    Integrated Integrated Iron and Steel mills have the most consistently high rate of SNC status
      across all programs.
  •    Aluminum and Copper refineries and Automobile Assembly plants have the lowest SNC
      rates.
                Number of Facilities  in Current
                  Significant Non-Compliance
                              I Air • Water HRCRA
    o
    z
    w
                       Industry Sector (# of facilities)
                                        12

-------
Historical Noncompliance

This indicator shows whether individual facilities are generally in compliance or in noncompliance
over a period of two years (measured as eight 3-month quarters).  This indicator does not reflect the
severity or duration of noncompliance, but provides an indication as to whether environmental
problems are recurring.

Findings:
  •    Across the three programs (CAA, CWA and RCRA), Integrated Iron and Steel Mills have,
      on average, the highest number of quarters with noncompliance events (seven out of a
      possible eight quarters); two quarters more than the next highest sector, Petroleum Refining.
  •    Across CAA, CWA and RCRA, Pulp Manufacturers have, on average, the fewest quarters
      with noncompliance events.
                    Average Number of Quarters with
                          Non-Compliant Event(s)
                      in Two Year (8-quarter) Period
                  i Air
i Water
HRCRA
rj Across Programs
                           Industry Sector (# of facilities)
                                       13

-------
Releases and Transfers Reported to the Toxics Release Inventory

The primary chemical release data used under SFIP come from the EPA Toxics Release Inventory
(TRI) Program. Under TRI, facilities meeting several criteria are required to self-report the amount
of over 600 chemicals released on-site, and those that are transferred to other sites on a yearly basis.
The off-site transfers reported to TRI are sent to a geographically or physically separate location for
the purposes of recycling, energy recovery, treatment (including publicly-owned treatment works
treating sewer discharges), or disposal. Although chemical release and transfer information is an
essential element of any facility or sector data profile, users also should be aware that chemical
releases at a given facility are not an indicator of whether the facility is in violation of
environmental laws.  Most of the chemicals reported under the TRI program may be allowable
under existing single-media permits, or may be unregulated. SFIP provides the total number of
pounds released and transferred as reported by each facility.

Findings:
  •    While SFIP includes just three percent of the 21,626 facilities reporting to TRI in 1996, the
      SFIP facilities represent approximately 26 percent of 1996 TRI on-site releases nationwide
      (547 million of 2,139 million pounds), and 18 percent of transfers nationwide (627 million of
      3,452 million pounds).
  •    The Iron and Steel Minimills and Pulp sectors have the highest sector aggregate releases and
      transfers. The aluminum sector has the lowest sector aggregate releases and transfers.
  •    Copper Refineries, Iron and Steel Minimills and Integrated Steel Mills have the highest per-
      facility chemical releases and transfers. Pulp Manufactures, Petroleum  and Aluminum
      refineries have the lowest releases and transfers.
                           1996 TRI Releases and Transfers,
                                        Sector Total
                                                              ft
                            ^
                                        Industry Sector (# of facllltiei)
                                             14

-------
1996 per Facility TRI Releases and Transfers

               •5s-
         Industry Sector (# of facilities)
                   15

-------
Spills

Pollutant spill information, an indicator of disruptions to normal operations, is available from the
Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) database administered by the National Response
Center and a number of different federal agencies. The facility level statistics for SFIP contain a
flag (yes or no) if any on-site spills occurring in the last two years were identified for a given
facility. Obvious duplication and off-site  spills were eliminated.  The ERNS report (available via
the Data Access page) contains further details about each spill, such as: spill date, name of the
material spilled, the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Registry number for the substance released,
the quantity of the substance released, the number of injuries resulting from releases as reported, and
the number of fatalities resulting from spill events as reported.

Findings:
  •   Integrate Steel Mills and Petroleum refineries had the highest fraction of facilities with spills
      in the last two years (70 and 64 percent, respectively).  The lowest fractions of facilities with
      spills were in the Iron and Steel Minimill, Copper Refining and Automobile Assembly
      sectors.
  •   The highest average spill amount was at Copper Refineries (33,000 Ibs/spill), followed by
      Integrated Iron and Steel Mills (20,000 Ibs/spill) and Petroleum Refineries (17,000 Ibs/spill).
      Automobile Assembly facilities had the smallest average spill amounts (809 Ibs/spill).
                            Per Facility Spill Amount
£
/

-------
        Number of Facilities with Spills
(0
0)
o
<0
u.
               ov
               Industry Sector (# of facilities)
                        17

-------

-------
CHAPTER THREE: DESCRIPTION OF DATA INDICATORS
The information used by SFIP is already publicly available. Much of it resides in EPA's own data
systems, having been submitted by the state regulatory agencies or EPA's own regional offices. The
facilities themselves prepare and submit some of the information, such as wastewater discharge
monitoring reports under the Clean Water Act and estimates of chemical releases and transfers to
the Toxics Release Inventory.  The spill records are reported, usually by the facility, to a telephone
hotline. Only facility name, address, and production or capacity are taken from outside data sources.
As described in Appendix C, one of the key components of SFIP is the identification and linking of
each permit related to the in-scope operations at SFIP facilities. This linkage has never been
established as part of the regulatory programs and is not reported by facilities. Once the linkages
were prepared, they were reviewed by EPA regional staff and then the facilities themselves. In
addition to the linkages, each facility was provided with its compliance and enforcement history
report, spill records and production information for review. Facilities' comments and corrections
were sent to  the agency and organization with authority to make the relevant changes.  EPA
requested its regional offices to track revisions to the compliance and enforcement data. SFIP staff
made changes to certain spill records as well  as names and addresses.  Comments regarding details
of the spill record were sent the National Response Center, which maintains the Emergency
Response Notification System. In total, the data review and revision process spanned five months
and will continue as needed.

As used by SFIP, the Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) system brings together a
variety of data from  both internal and external sources:
             Permit requirements from each regulatory program (CAA, CWA,
             RCRA, EPCRA), which are tracked and reported to appropriate state
             data systems (then provided to EPA regional offices), or EPA regional
             data systems and EPCRA, with direct reporting to the Federal Toxics
             Release Inventory (TRI)
             Data accessible via EPA systems
                    already linked: TRI releases and transfers
                    not linked prior to SFIP: spills
             Data from external sources: production
In turn, the linked information is used to generate several different summaries of the SFIP facility
information:
1 . Detailed facility reports -^
2. Facility-level statistics "^
3. Sector-level statistics ~^
Three reports provide details for all indicators:
Compliance and Enforcement, Spills, TRI Release
Transfers (via link to TRI Website)
and
All indicators
All indicators
                                            19

-------
SFIP created a number of different ways of accessing, reviewing, and analyzing information.
This printed report, provides a description of the project and gives readers access to summary
statistics for all 653 SFIP facilities. Chapter 4 of this report contains all of the facility-level statistics
for all SFIP facilities. The text and graphics in Chapter 2 of this report highlight selected indicators
at the sector level. An example of the facility level statistics is presented on page 22. The table on
page 21 lists all of the SFIP  indicators and describes where they can be found.  The data for all 653
SFIP facilities is presented, by sector, in Chapter 4.  However, the most detailed reports are
available from the SFIP Website. In addition, the Website offers users the ability to:

     •  download the data for their own use,
     •  conduct their own on-line analyses of SFIP facilities using simple point-and-click menus,
       and
     •  readily look up the detailed records of specific facilities.
                                              20

-------
Availability of Facility Information from SFIP Report and Website
SFIP Information
Facility name and location
Permits held by facility
Inspections (by program)
Historical Noncompliance: # quarters in last 2 years w/
noncompliance event (by program)
CWA Permit Exceedances: # of pollutants regulated
and # over permit limit any time in 2 years
CWA Permit Exceedances: # of monitoring reports
submitted and # over permit limit
Current Significant Noncompliance Status (by
program)
Closed Enforcement Actions in last 2 years (by
program)
1995 Production or Capacity
1995 TRI Chemical Releases + Off-Site Transfers
- Pounds Released
- Pounds Transferred
- Ratio of Releases+Transfers/Production
- Pounds of Carcinogens Released to Air, Water +
Land
- Pounds of Metals Released and Transferred
On-Site Spill(s) Occurrence
Demographics: Population in surrounding 3 miles
Facility
Statistics
(in Report)
/

/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Facility
Statistics (on
Website)
/

/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Detailed
Facility Report
(on Website)
/
/
/
Status of each
permit each quarter


/
Incl. lead agency,
date and penalty


/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Detailed release
and transfer info.,
by chemical, avail.
by link to TRI site




List of each spill,
chemical, amount,
etc.
Detailed
demographic
information of area
21

-------
SFIP Facility Statistics - In Chapter 4 of this report, the SFIP indicators for each of the 653 facilities are presented across two tables.
Compliance statistics are presented in Sample Table 1.  Chemical release, spills, and the population estimate are presented in Sample Table 2.
Many of the compliance indicators are broken out by environmental program (Air, Water and RCRA) and are totaled across the three programs.
SAMPLE TABLE 1: FACILITY STATISTICS - SECTOR XXX

SFIP ID
Facility
Name
City
State
Inspections (2 years)
Air
Water
RCRA
Air/
Water/
RCRA
Historical Noncompliance
(Quarterly Periods with 1
or more violations or
noncompliance events)
Air
Water
RCRA
Air/
Water/
RCRA
Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act
(2-year data)
#of
Pollutants
Over Limit
#of
Pollutants
Regulated
#of
Reports
Over Limit
#of
Reports
Submitted
Current
Significant
Noncompliance Indicator
Air
(Y/N)
Water
(Y/N)
RCRA
(Y/N)
Air/
Water/
RCRA

Closed Enforcement
Actions - 2 Years
Air
Water
RCRA
Total

XXX.INOOOl
XXX.PA0002
AAA Co.
BBB Co.
Sunny
Elm
IN
PA
10
4
4
1
2
1
16
6
3
1
2
2
0
1
4
2
7
3
17
12
24
18
734
288
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
2
0
2
0
1
1
1
0
4
1
SAMPLE TABLE 2: FACILITY STATISTICS - SECTOR XXX

SFIP ID

XXX.INOOOl
.
                                                               22

-------
SFIP Detailed Facility Report - On this and the following pages is an example of a Detailed Facility Report; the actual reports are available on the SFIP
Website, for each facility. The detailed compliance information and history as well as demographic and geographic information contained in these reports
is summarized by the facility statistics in Chapter 4. Important background information for each indicator is presented beginning on page 26. It is
strongly recommended that users read the description and limitations associated with each indicator prior to reviewing the facility statistics.
                                                              U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                           INTEGRATED DATA FACILITY-SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE PROFILE REPORT 1C
   Linked Permits and Identifiers Using: SFI   |  SFIPID:PET.MA0230
  Statute System Source ID
  RCRA
  CWA
  CAA
  SFI    PET.MA0230
  RCR    MAD000442645
Designation: TSD:Y  LQG:Y
  PCS    MA0004413
 Facility Name
 MASS REFINERS
 MASS REFINERY  PLANT
SIC  Codes:2911
 MASS REF.  PLT.
Designation: Major  SIC Codes:2911
  AFS    3120400022         MASS REFINERY
Designation: Federally Reportable  SIC Codes:
                                                   2911
  EP313   TRI     02337MSSRF8000V     MASS REFINERIES GREENSBORO PLT
       SIC Codes:2911 5171   Lat:42.2448  Long:  -90.0292
 |  Enforcement Actions |

 Statute  Source  ID     Type of Action
 CAA     3120400022    STATE ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER  ISSUED
Street Address
 800 MICHAELS DRIVE
 800 MICHAEL DR.
 800 MICHAEL

 800 MICHAELS DRIVE

 800 MICHAELS DRIVE.
 City
PEABODY
PEABODY
PEABODY

PEABODY

PEABODY
                                                                                                        P9 1
ST  ZIP
MA  02337
MA  02337

MA  02337

MA  02338

MA  02337
                                                                   Date
                                                                   09/23/1995
                                                       Penalty
                                                       $19,000
                               Penalty Description
                               FINAL PENALTY
 |  Current Significant Non-Compliance Status |
Statute Source ID
 RCRA   MAD000442645
                  Designation
                   TSD:Y  LQG:Y
               Significant    Most  Recent
              Non-compliance Quarter     Description
               YES           199704
 CWA    MA0004413          Major                 NO
 CAA    3120400022         Federally Reportable   NO
                                                       1997Q2
                                                       1997Q2
                                                                             23

-------
                                                                   U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                                               INTEGRATED DATA FACILITY-SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE PROFILE REPORT 1C
                                                                                                         P9 2
 I  Noncompliance Status by FY Quarters |

 Statute  Source ID   C=Compliant V=Violation   QTR1
                                          QTR2
                                     QTR3
               QTR4
QTR5
QTR6
QTR7
                                                                                             QTR8
                                                                      FYQtrs Include
   RCRA: MAD000442645/ Area of Violation      Jan-Mar96   Apr-Jun96  Jul-Sep96  Oct-Dec96  Jan-Mar97  Apr-Jun97  Jul-Sep97  Oct-Dec97  Jan96-Dec97
      GENERATOR-ALL REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)   02/13/1994 04/10/1996
      TSD-OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)      02/13/1994 04/10/1996
      TSD-GROUNDWATER MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 02/13/1994 »»»»» »»»»» »»»»» »»»»» »»»»» »»»»» »»»»»
   CWA: MA0004413/ NPDES Parameter in Violatn  Oct-Dec95  Jan-Mar96  Apr-Jun96  Jul-Sep96  Oct-Dec96  Jan-Mar97  Apr-Jun97   Jul-Sep97  Oct95-Sept97
  	                                          C-Resolved
   CAA:  3120400022
Program/Pollutant in Current  Violation
      MACT (SECTION 63 NESHAPS)
      SIP
      NESHAP
              BZ        V-NO  SCH
                              Oct-Dec95  Jan-Mar96  Apr-Jun96   Jul-Sep96  Oct-Dec96  Jan-Mar97  Apr-Jun97  Jul-Sep97  Oct95-Sept97
                               V-NO SCH   C-SCHED     C-SCHED     C-INSP
                               V-NO SCH   C-SCHED     V-NO SCH    C-INSP
 |  Inspection History

  Statute Source ID
  RCRA    MAD000442645
  RCRA    MAD000442645
  RCRA    MAD000442645
  CUA     MA0004413
  CAA     3120400022
  CAA     3120400022
         Inspection   Type
         Non-financial Record Review
         Samp(i ng Inspec t f on
         Compliance (Grounduater) Monitoring Eval
         COMPLIANCE EVAL (NON-SAMPLING)
         Onsite Level 2 Inspection
         Onsite Level 2 Inspection
                                             Lead Agency
                                             State
                                             State
                                             State
                                             EPA
                                             State
                                             EPA
                                                           NO ST REG  NO ST REG  NO ST REG  NO ST REG
                                                           C-INSP    V-NO SCH    C-INSP     C-INSP
                                                           C-INSP    C-INSP      C-INSP     C-INSP
                         Date
                         09/12/1995
                         01/04/1996
                         01/17/1996
                         09/22/1996
                         07/19/1995
                         04/11/1996
  [Demographic Profile of  Surrounding  Area  -  Summary|
Radius of Area:
Center Latitude:
Center Longitude:
Total Persons:
xx Miles
xxxx.xxxx
xxxx.xxxx
XX, XXX, XXX
Land Area:
Water Area:
Population Dens:
Percent Minorities:
XXX. XX%
XXX. XX%
xxxx.xx/squ.mi .
XXX. XX%
                                                                      Households (HHs) in Area:     xx,xxx
                                                                      Housing Units in Area:        xx.xxx
                                                                      HHs on Public Assistance:     xx,xxx
                                                                      Persons below Poverty Level: xxx,xxx
 Race Breakdown:  Persons  (X)    Age  Breakdown: Persons (%)
 White:
 African-Amer.:
 Hispanic-Orig:
 Asian/Pacific:
 Amer.-Indian:
 Other  race:
xxx,xxx (xx.x)
xxx,xxx (xx.x)
XXX,XXX (XX.X)
XXX,XXX (XX.X)
XXX,XXX (XX.X)
XXX,XXX (XX.X)
Child. (<5 yrs):  xxx,xxx (xx.x)
Minors (<18 yrs): xxx,xxx (xx.x)
Adults (>17 yrs): xxx,xxx (xx.x)
Senior (>64 yrs): xxx,xxx (xx.x)
Education Level:  Persons (%)
(Persons 25&older)
Less than 9th:     xxx,xxx (xx.x)
9th - 12th grade:  xxx,xxx (xx.x)
H.S. diploma:      xxx,xxx (xx.x)
some college/2-yr: xxx,xxx (xx.x)
B.S./B.A. or more: xxx,xxx (xx.x)   > $75K:
                                                                                                     Income Breakdown: HHs (%)
          < $15K:
          $15K - $25K:
          $25K - $50K:
            xx,xxx (xx.x)
            XX,XXX (XX.X)
            XX,XXX (XX.X)
          $50K -  $75K:  xx.xxx (xx.x)
                       XX,XXX (XX.X)
                                                                                      24

-------
ERNS INCIDENT REPORT

This is an example of the type of information provided on an Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) Incident Report, which is
available on the SFIP Website.

EPA has carefully screened the information included in this report, but the data represented here may not include all spills that have
occurred, and in some instances spills may be wrongly attributed to individual facilities. The ERNS database is available on-line as well and
can be found by clicking HERE

SFIP ID:
PET.KS0269
Discharger Discharger
Organization ID

MASS 438506
REFINERS
OIL CORP.
MASS 438506
REFINERS
OIL CORP.
MASS 249725
REFINERS
OIL CORP.
MASS 438506
REFINERS
OIL CORP



Discharger
Address

RT 75 AND
REFINERY
RD
RT 75 AND
REFINERY
RD
RT 75 AND
REFINERY
RD
1000
REFINERY
RD



Discharger
City

PEABODY


PEABODY


PEABODY


PEABODY


http


Discharger Discharger
State Zip Code

MA 02053


MA 02053


MA 02053


MA 02053


://www.epa.gov/oeca/sfi.


Date of Spill
(Yr/Mo/Day)

19960219


19961122


19970115


19971005




City of
Incident

PEABODY


PEABODY


PEABODY


PEABODY




State of Zip Code Substance CAS No. of No. of No. of
Incident of Incident Released Chemical Injuries Deaths
Released
MA 02053 SULFUR
DIOXIDE

MA 02053 SOUR
WATER
(D-003D018)
MA 02053 WASTE OIL


MA 02053 OIL FUEL,
NO.2




Quantity
Released
(Pounds)
19


6


124


32


                                                       25

-------
SFIP INDICATORS

This section includes descriptions and additional background information for each of the
facility-specific indicators included in SFIP. The indicators are included to convey important
information relating to facility size, past as well as current compliance and enforcement status,
chemical releases, pollutant spills and demographic information regarding the surrounding
population.  Many of the indicators explained below are aggregated from raw data contained in
EPA databases. To the extent possible, SFIP allows data users to view the raw data in order to
give more context to broader aggregate indicators. For example, if a facility is shown as having
one closed enforcement action, the underlying data would provide details on the event to which
the enforcement action  pertained, when it happened, and whether an associated penalty resulted
and the amount. This layered approach allows for comparative analysis, and more thorough
inquiry regarding individual facility records.

The SFIP indicators are compiled and generated primarily from EPA's Integrated Data for
Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) system. This system provides the capability to integrate separate
EPA databases for the purpose of providing information across many regulatory programs.  To
make the proper connections across data systems using different facility identifiers, complicated
automated and manual data reconciliation necessitated that the work under SFIP be constrained
to a defined number of data systems. Consequently, SFIP currently focuses primarily on EPA
data relating to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) program, and air, water, and hazardous/solid
waste statutes.  There are a number of other federal statutory requirements which are not included
in the compliance history of the facilities covered by this project.  These include, for example,
requirements under Superfund (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act)  and the Safe Drinking Water Act.  To the extent possible, SFIP will incorporate
other important data from other programs  in the future.

       NOTE: The standardized reports available through SFIP array indicators in such a way as
       to separate the compliance and enforcement data from  information not related to
       compliance (i.e., chemical release, production or demographic data).  TRI chemical
       release information is provided for each reporting facility.  It is not a measure of
       compliance as the reported releases are typically permissible under current laws.

       NOTE: SFIP links the permits and identification numbers associated with those facilities
       with active operations included in  SFIP. Due to statutory requirements and the physical
       layout  of particular facilities, there are instances where a permit or identification number
       covers other operations located on the same site. For example, the Toxics Release
       Inventory program requires facilities to estimate chemical releases and transfers from all
       of their operations on a contiguous property. Consequently, the TRI release and transfers
       estimates associated with a particular refinery may also include releases and transfers
       from other operations, such as organic chemical production, located on the same property
       as the petroleum refinery.
                                           26

-------
Inspections: The number of state/local and federal inspections that have occurred at each facility
examined under the project.

Under SFIP, EPA provides the number of inspections that have occurred under the Clean Air Act
(CAA), the Clean Water Act (CWA), and the Resource Recovery and Conservation Act (RCRA)
over the past two years. Inspections include all federal and state/local inspections that are
reported into federal data systems. The three major systems are: Resource Conservation and
Recovery Information System (RCRIS) for hazardous waste management inspections;
Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) for air inspections; and the Permit Compliance
System (PCS) for water inspections. This indicator is used to show inspection presence.
Underlying data, such as the date and type of inspection performed, are presented on the Detailed
Facility Report.

       NOTE: The inspection data within SFIP are limited to what EPA collects at the federal
       level. Thus, there may be inspections at the state/local level that are not required to be
       reported to the federal  systems.

Historical Noncompliance: The number of quarterly periods with one or more identified
violation or noncompliance during the eight quarterly periods over the last two years.

This indicator is  designed to show whether individual facilities are generally in compliance, or in
noncompliance over a period of two years.  The indicator examines whether instances of
noncompliance occurred or continued from previous periods at facilities within the past eight
quarterly measurement periods.  Each quarter equals three months; therefore eight quarters equals
24 months, or two years. Under CAA, CWA and RCRA, SFIP indicates historical
noncompliance as reported into national data systems by the state/local agencies and EPA
Regions. Underlying information is available for each facility, which can be used to determine
the type of violation or noncompliance that is counted in the aggregate statistics, and whether
multiple events occurred.

The quarter is used as the measurement period because it is the shortest measurement period
across all three statutes in which EPA receives noncompliance data from states.  The
methodology used for this indicator does not reflect all potential noncompliance events because:
1) state/local data may not have been entered into or required by federal data systems; 2 ) EPA,
the state or local regulatory agency may not have visited the facility to determine the compliance
status; or 3) facilities may be out of compliance with other statutes and programs that are beyond
the three programs included in this project.  In many cases, EPA does not require national
reporting for facilities with "minor" water permits (which establish limits for pollutants such as
oil and grease), so noncompliance at these facilities may not be completely captured in the SFIP
data.  When possible, EPA provides an indication as to when  data are not available; however, in
some cases when the compliance status is unknown, facilities may be shown to be in  compliance.
                                           27

-------
Given the available data collected, this indicator provides a screening-level indicator of historical
non-compliance with the notes listed above. It is important to note that this aggregate indicator is
not designed to distinguish the severity of the violation or noncompliance.  More detailed
historical noncompliance information (e.g., pollutants over permit limits, reporting violations,
dates) is available through SFIP on the Detailed Facility Report.

       NOTE: The compliance history data within SFIP are limited to what EPA collects at the
       federal level. Thus, there may be quarterly noncompliance information maintained at the
       state/local level that are not required to be reported to the federal systems.

       NOTE: This indicator does not reflect the duration of noncompliance within a quarterly
       period in which a facility is considered out of compliance.  Thus, there may be an
       instance where the facility is out of compliance for a period that is less than the entire
       quarter but is flagged for being in violation for the quarter. The duration of violation may
       be ascertained by reviewing the underlying data reports that indicate the starting and
       ending dates of violations or noncompliance events.

       NOTE: When the Agency has made a determination that a facility  is not in compliance,
       oftentimes a facility will be put on an enforceable compliance schedule to bring them into
       compliance with permit or regulatory requirements. In this data system, a facility is
       considered to be "in compliance" if it is meeting a compliance schedule even though it is
       not in compliance with all underlying regulatory and permit requirements.

Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act: The number of times facilities report their water
discharges, and how often these discharges are over permitted levels.

This indicator merges information on both pollutant release and compliance history.  The
indicator shows the number and frequency of self-reported water monitoring events that are over
permitted limits under the CWA. This indicator is limited to the CWA as there are no similar
indicators available nationally  for the CAA and RCRA.

The CWA requires that EPA or the states set limits through permits under the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) on the amount of pollutants that facilities may discharge
into a waterbody. Limits for these discharges are set according to national technology-based
standards, and the conditions of the waters that receive the discharge based  on state water quality
standards. Depending upon the reporting period specified in a facility's permit, a facility may be
required to submit monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, annual, or bi-annual monitoring
reports for a parameter.  A parameter can be a chemical, such as cadmium; a pollutant, such as
total suspended solids; or a characteristic of the wastewater, such as pH or temperature.
Different reporting periods may be specified for a single permitted parameter based on
monitoring locations within single or multiple discharge pipes.
                                           28

-------
In capturing pollutant releases that are over permitted levels, EPA displays permit exceedances at
the parameter level which enable users to track four indicators:
  •     the total number of Permit Compliance System (PCS) parameters monitored across all
       pipes and NPDES permits maintained by a regulated facility;
  •     the total number of those parameters for which there is at least one exceedance of the
       permitted limit in the past two years;
  •     the total number of self-reporting events by parameter in the past two years; and
  •     the total number of those events which exceeded the permitted limit.

The display of permit exceedances at the parameter level is based solely on the self-reported
monitoring results in PCS, and does not involve any calculations based on the frequency or
severity of violations within a specified period of time. This indicator was added based on
stakeholder comments that more information was needed on noncompliance related to the
frequency of monitoring and the number of times permit limits were exceeded.

       NOTE:  These  four indicators apply to all PCS parameters (e.g., chemical pollutants as
       well as temperature) since it is not currently possible to differentiate among classes of
       parameters using the PCS data stored in IDEA.

Current Significant Noncompliance Indicator (SNC): The most recent status for the facility
with regard to whether more severe noncompliance has been detected.

In contrast to the historical noncompliance indicator explained above, SNC provides an
indication of whether violations or noncompliance events at a given facility may pose a more
severe level of environmental threat.  SFIP uses the significant noncompliance indicator as
defined by each individual program.  The aggregate indicator shown within SFIP indicates a
"yes" or "no" variable  for SNC under the CAA, CWA, and RCRA for the most recent publicly
available data.

       NOTE:  EPA does not maintain historical SNC data in all data systems, so this indicator
       is only used for the most current period.

Air Program SNC - The term for SNC in AIRS is significant violation (SV). Significant
violation of an air source is defined by the "Significant Violator/Timely and Appropriate" Policy
(SV/T&A Policy) issued in February of 1992.  The definition of SV under the Policy is under
review by OECA and State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators
(STAPPA)/Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials (ALAPCO). At present, an SV
is defined as any major or synthetic minor source with any emissions or substantial procedural
violation. SVs are tracked in AFS which is the national database on stationary source compliance
and enforcement. Once a source is determined to be a SV, the delegated state/local agency or
EPA must report that the source is a SV  to AIRS Facility Subsystem (AFS).  The source is
removed from the list of active SVs by appropriate resolution of the violation. Generally,
appropriate resolution  means that the delegated authority or EPA  has determined that the facility


                                           29

-------
is no longer in violation and any associated penalties have been paid.  As a measure of
accountability with the SV/T&A Policy, the Agency maintains a somewhat abbreviated list of
active SVs, tracking SVs only until they have been addressed. An addressing action may be
equivalent to a resolving action, but often is only a step toward it.

Water Program SNC - A facility will be classified in SNC if it meets any of the following three
conditions: submitting a major report 30 days or more past the due date, failure to meet a major
schedule by 90 days or more, or a major exceedance of selected effluent limits. The PCS data
system is set up to anticipate data from the permittee on effluent discharges, reports and
schedules as well  as to calculate violations. In addition, the facility has an obligation to notify the
regulatory agency when it has violations or that compliance has been achieved. A facility may
also be placed in SNC if it fails to comply with the requirements of any enforcement order taken
against it.  In PCS, a facility is removed from SNC status when either the conditions which
resulted in its categorization as SNC no longer exist or a formal enforcement action regarding the
violation has been taken.

RCRA Program  SNC - In RCRIS, a facility  is  classified as being in SNC if it has caused actual
exposure or a substantial likelihood of exposure to hazardous waste or hazardous waste
constituents; is a chronic or recalcitrant violator; or deviates substantially from the terms of a
permit, order, agreement or RCRA statutory or regulatory requirement. A facility is removed
from SNC status when the facility returns to full physical compliance for all violations, and/or a
facility is in compliance with a compliance schedule for any outstanding violations. If just one
violation does not fall into one of the above categories, the facility is out of compliance and
maintains its SNC status.

Closed Enforcement Actions: Closed administrative or civil judicial government actions that
have been taken at each facility for violating environmental laws.

This indicator provides the number of closed federal and state/local enforcement actions that
have been entered into federal data systems for each facility over the past two years. While the
details and regulatory requirements differ across CAA,  CWA and RCRA, an enforcement action
can be defined as  a formal action to address violations either administratively or through the
court system.  Only closed enforcement actions  under CAA, CWA and RCRA are included. This
information does  not include notices of violation (NOVs), referrals and informal enforcement
actions. More detailed information on the breakdown by each statute, the date, type of action,
and penalty amount is available via the Data Access Page.

       NOTE: The compliance history data within SFIP are limited to what EPA collects at the
       federal level. Thus, there may be enforcement actions at the state/local level that are not
       required to be reported to the federal systems.
                                           30

-------
       NOTE: There are a number of other federal statutory requirements which are not
       included in the summary of enforcement actions for the facilities covered by this project.
       These include, for example, requirements under Superfund and the Safe Drinking Water
       Act.

Production or Production Capacity: Production or production capacity of a facility (e.g.,
tons/year).

SFIP includes information on the production or production capacity of included facilities. EPA
prefers to use actual production; however, it is available only for the automobile assembly plants.
Estimated average daily production is available for pulp manufacturers. For all other industry
sectors, the production capacity for each facility is used.  Production or capacity of a facility is
included as an indicator of facility size and complexity. Facility size is a useful indicator that
provides more context to the chemical release and compliance information. The indicator allows
users to index or reference other indicators by the size and complexity of a facility.

The following sources are used for each individual sector.  EPA has offered each facility the
opportunity to review its production or capacity information. Where corrections or missing data
were supplied and documented, they were incorporated into the current SFIP.

SFIP matches the production data year to the year of TRI data used (currently 1996).

  •    Automobile Assembly - 1996 production.  Units are number of passenger cars and light
       trucks produced. Source: Automotive News Market Data Book.

  •    Iron and Steel Production - Capacity as reported for 1996. Units are short tons of
       product per year (short ton = 2000 pounds). Sources: Iron and Steel Directory; Steel
       Manufacturers Association Membership Directory.

  •    Petroleum Refining  - Operating and idle production capacity reported as of January 1,
       1995 to the U.S. Department of Energy. Because DOE collects this data every other year,
       1995 data will be retained for  1996. Units are barrels per day of atmospheric crude oil.
       Source: U.S. Department of Energy.
  •    Primary Nonferrous Metals  Smelting and Refining - Capacity as reported  for 1996.
       Units are metric tons per year (metric ton = 2,200 pounds). Source: United States
       Geological Survey.

  •    Pulp Manufacturing - Average daily production as reported for 1996.  Units are short
       tons of product per day (short ton = 2,000 pounds). Source: Lockwood-Post Directory.

       NOTE: The units of production and capacity differ across industry sectors and are relevant
       only for comparisons among facilities within a particular sector.

                                              31

-------
TRI Releases: Total pounds of TRI chemicals released to air, discharged directly to water, landfilled
on-site or injected underground in 1996.

The primary source of chemical release data in SFIP is the EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI)
program, which was established as part of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know
Act. The TRI program was established to promote public awareness of chemical releases, but is not
a "standard-setting" regulation that spells out chemical release limits.  Under TRI, facilities meeting
several criteria are required to self-report the amounts of certain chemicals released on-site, and
transferred to other sites on a yearly basis.  TRI maintains a listing of over 600 chemicals that must
be reported.  The regulatory limits for pollutant releases at these facilities are contained within
individual single-media permits (e.g., Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act). Although chemical release
information is an essential element of any facility or sector data profile, the reported releases may
be allowed either because the chemical is not regulated, or is allowed under existing single-media
permit limits.  SFIP provides the total number of pounds released as reported by each facility.  The
TRI Website provides users total chemical release estimates and breaks down the on-site releases
according to environmental media: air, land, underground injection, and water.

       NOTE: Although TRI is considered the best and most comprehensive source of chemical
       release data, there are several limitations associated with this information. The user must
       recognize that self-reported releases may be submitted based upon estimation  techniques
       rather than direct monitoring.  Self-reported release amounts might not therefore represent
       the  exact amount of release.  Second, TRI is not a comprehensive listing of all chemicals
       released. Many chemicals and chemical mixtures that may be released by facilities might not
       be on the list of reportable chemicals under the TRI program. Many of the single-media
       regulatory programs require data on these additional chemicals, and EPA is exploring ways
       to provide this information under SFIP.

       NOTE: The user also should be aware that chemical releases at a given facility are not an
       indicator of whether the facility is in violation of environmental laws. Most of the chemicals
       reported under the  TRI program may be allowable under existing single-media  permits, or
       may be unregulated.

TRI Off-site  Transfers: Total pounds of TRI chemicals either discharged to a sewer system or
shipped off-site for disposal or treatment in 1996.

Off-site transfers of toxic chemicals from facilities meeting reporting thresholds are required to be
reported to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI). The off-site transfers reported to TRI are sent to a
geographically or physically separate location  for the purposes of recycling,  energy recovery,
treatment (including publicly-owned treatment works treating sewer discharges), or disposal. This
indicator does not reflect actual  releases  following the  management of chemical wastestreams
off-site.  The  quantities reported represent a movement of the chemical away from the reporting
facility.  Because post-production management of toxics can occur either on-site or off-site, off-site


                                           32

-------
transfers are an important complementary indicator to TRI chemical releases with which to
characterize facility operations.

       NOTE: The user also should be aware that chemical transfer amounts at a given facility are
       not an indicator of whether the facility is in violation of environmental laws. Most of the
       chemicals reported under the TRI program may be allowable under existing single-media
       permits, or may be unregulated.

Ratio  of Chemicals Released  and Transferred to Production or Capacity:  Pounds of TRI
chemicals released and transferred offsite in 1996 divided by facility production or capacity (units
differ by sector).

The ratio of TRI chemical releases and transfers to production or production capacity is designed to
indicate differences in  chemical releases per  unit of production for facilities producing similar
outputs. Because the unit of production or production capacity is specific to the industry sector or
subsector, the unitless ratio is meaningful only within a given sector or subsector.

TRI Releases - Carcinogens: Pounds of known or suspect carcinogens released to the air or water,
disposed of via underground injection, or landfilled on-site in 1996.

This indicator presents the pounds of known or suspect carcinogens released to the air or water,
disposed of via underground injection, or landfilled on-site. Known carcinogens are those that have
been shown to cause cancer in humans.  Suspect carcinogens are those that have been shown to cause
cancer in animals. A further description of these chemicals can be found in the TRI Public Data
Release document available from EPA's EPCRA Hotline (800-535-0202). This indicator presents
greater detail on chemical releases for a category  of chemicals which may be of particular concern
due to their possible effects on human health in the environment. In 1996, carcinogens represented
approximately two percent of all TRI releases.

       NOTE: This indicator includes releases of suspect or known carcinogens.  It does not
       include off-site transfers.

TRI Releases and Transfers - Metals: Pounds of metals and metal compounds (only the metal
portion of metal compounds) which were either released or transferred off-site in 1996.

This indicator presents the pounds of metals and metal compounds (only the metal portion of
metal compounds) which were released or transferred off-site. Metals differ from  other TRI
chemicals because they do not degrade and are not destroyed by treatment although they may be
treated to reduce their availability to the environment. A further description of these chemicals
can be found in the TRI Public Data Release document available from EPA's EPCRA Hotline
(800-535-0202). This indicator  presents  greater detail on chemical releases and transfers for a
category of chemicals which may be of particular concern due to their possible effects on human
health and  the environment. For the approximately 22,000 facilities reporting to TRI in 1996, the


                                           33

-------
vast majority of on-site releases of metals and metal compounds were land disposed. Metals
made up slightly more than one-half of transfers, most of which were shipped.off-site for
recycling.

       NOTE: This indicator includes releases, as well as off-site transfers, of TRI chemicals.
       Reporting of TRI releases does not necessarily indicate that the chemical can readily
       migrate off-site.  Off-site transfers are not necessarily managed near the facility.

TRI Production-Related Waste: Pounds of TRI chemicals contained production-related waste
prior to recycling, treatment, energy recovery or disposal.

Since 1993, in addition to releases and transfers, TRI reporting also includes estimates of TRI
chemicals in waste from routine production during the calendar year.  The amount reported as
waste includes all waste flows prior to recycling (closed-loop/in-process recycling is excluded),
treatment, energy recovery or disposal, whether management occurs on-site or off-site.  This
indicator is useful in characterizing existing source reduction efforts and in identifying further
opportunities for source reduction.

       NOTE: The user should be aware that production-related waste amounts at a given
       facility do not represent chemical releases or indicate whether the facility is in violation
       of environmental laws.  Most of the chemicals reported under the TRI program may be
       allowable under existing single-media permits, or may be unregulated.

Pollutant Spills: On-site chemical or material spills within the past two years.

Pollutant spill information is included in SFIP as an indicator of disruptions to normal
operations.  Spill information is available from the Emergency Response Notification System
(ERNS) database administered by a number of different federal agencies.  The facility level
statistics for SFIP contain a flag (yes or no) if any on-site spills occurring in the last two years
were identified for a given facility. For this project, obvious duplicate and revised reports of the
same events were eliminated by selecting only the "most-up-to-date" reports and by deleting all
duplicate values of spill poundage for a particular facility and spill date. An "ERNS Incident
Report" is available via the Data Access page of the SFIP Website. This report contains further
details about each spill,  such as: spill date, name of the material spilled, the Chemical Abstracts
Service (CAS) Registry number for the substance released, the quantity of the substance released,
the number of injuries resulting from releases as reported, and the number of fatalities resulting
from releases as reported.

The ERNS database is a cooperative data sharing effort among the U.S. Coast Guard, EPA
Headquarters, the Department of Transportation, EPA Regions, and the National Response
Center to store information on  the release notifications  of oil and other hazardous substances.
Initial notifications may be updated with information from various federal, state and local
response authorities. The data are intended for support in emergency planning efforts and in


                                           34

-------
developing spill prevention programs. To link ERNS records with the SFIP facilities, all ERNS
records for the past two years that contained the same first three digit zip code as those reported
in SFIP facility permits were reviewed. On-site spills were identified if there was a match
between the name and address of the discharger and those of an SFIP facility.

       NOTE: ERNS is a "report-driven" database, containing mostly initial accounts made
       during or immediately after a release, when details are often unknown. While we have
       carefully screened the ERNS information included in SFIP, the data represented may not
       include all spills that have occurred at SFIP facilities.

Estimated Surrounding Population: Estimated population living within three miles of a facility
and associated demographics.

SFIP includes a number of population-based  statistics provided by the Bureau of Census. The
total population within a three-mile radius of a facility is one indicator of the facility's
surrounding environment and provides context for other facility indicators. This indicator does
not imply that there is any  exposure to the identified population.  The Detailed Facility Report for
each SFIP facility contains a wide variety of additional demographic and geographic information
for the surrounding area, including but not limited to: percentage of households by income level;
percentage of residents below poverty level; distribution of educational level in the population;
race  of residents; age distribution of residents; number of households; and percentage of area
covered by water.

The calculation of surrounding populations was done using the latest TRI "preferred" latitude and
longitudes, or as found in other EPA databases. Surrounding populations and other statistics
were estimated by retrieving the data for Census block groups within three miles of each facility.
The internal point from the "1990 Census of Population and Housing  Summary Tape Files 1A
and 3 A" was used for the selection technique.

       NOTE: Alternative methods (which may yield more accurate  estimates), such as
       equal-area "weighted" population estimates and/or use of Census block data rather than
       block-group data, may be used in the future. In addition, the option to allow users to
       specify the radius may be included in  future modifications of SFIP.
                                               35

-------
36

-------
CHAPTER FOUR: FACILITY LEVEL DATA TABLES

This chapter presents the facility-level statistics of the SFIP indicators discussed in Chapter 3.
They are broken into three tables. Table A presents facility name and address. Compliance
statistics are presented in Table B. Chemical release, spills, and population estimates are
presented in Table C. The tables are organized by industry subsector and include each facility
operating in 1996. The sectors are organized as follows:

       Industry Sector/Subsector          Number of Facilities          Page(s)
   Automobile Assembly Plants               58                      39-41
   Pulp Manufacturers                       247                      43-57
   Petroleum Refineries                     179                      59-70
   Integrated Iron and Steel Mills              25                      71-73
   Steel Minimills                           91                      75-80
   Primary Aluminum Refineries              23                      81-83
   Primary Copper Refineries                 21                      85-87
   Primary Lead Refineries                    4                      89-91
   Primary Zinc Refineries                     3                      93-95

As mentioned earlier, further information on each of these facilities and their compliance records
can be viewed and downloaded from the SFIP Website.
                         http://www.epa.gov/oeca/sfi.                          |
                                         37

-------

-------
                                         Auto Assembly Location Data
                                                    Table A
Data pulled on July 13,1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
NAME
NUMMI; : : : : •••••••: 	 -:•;::.:•;.
CHRYSLER CORP.
GENERAL MOTORS
FORD MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
CHRYSLER CORP.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
DIAMOND-STAR MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
SUBARU-ISUZU
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS CORP
TOYOTA MOTOR MRS
FORD MOTOR CO
FORD MOTOR CO (KENTUCKY TRUCK
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
FORD MOTOR CO
CHRYSLER (NEW MACK AVE )
CHRYSLER CORP (JEFFERSON N)
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
AUTOAUIANCE INTL.
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS (C PLANT)
GENERAL MOTORS (M PLANT)
GENERAL MOTORS (EAST)
CHRYSLER CORP.
CHRYSLER CORP
FORD MOTOR CO.
FORD MOTOR CO. (MICHIGAN TRUCK
FORD MOTOR CO
FORD MOTOR CO
FORD MOTOR CO
CHRYSLER CORP (DODGE DRIVE)
CHRYSLER CORP. (N. HIGHWAY DRI
FORD MOTOR CO-
GENERAL MOTORS
FORD MOTOR CO-
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
CHRYSLER CORP. *1
CHRYSLER CORP. *2
FORD MOTOR CO.
HONOA OF AMERICA
FORD MOTOR CO.
GENERAL MOTORS
HONDA OF AMERICA
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
BMW MANUFACTURING CORP
NISSAN MOTOR MFG.
GENERAL MOTORS (SATURN)
GENERAL MOTORS
FORD MOTOR CO
GENERAL MOTORS
STREET ADDRESS
45500 FREEMONTBLVp :
550 SOUTH COLLEGE AVE.
BOXWOOD « DOOSON ROADS
340 HENRY FORD II AVENUE
3900 MOTORS INDUSTRIAL WAY
3000 W CHRYSLER DRIVE
12500 TORRENCE AVE.
100 N. DIAMOND-STAR PKWY
12200 LAFAYETTE CENTER RD
5500 SR 38 EAST
3201 FAIRFAX TRAFF1CWAY
PO BOX 90006
1001 CHERRY BLOSSOM WAY
3001 CHAMBERLAIN LN
FERN VALLEY & GLADE RO
7600 GM BOULEVARD
2122 8ROENING HIGHWAY
902 E. HAMILTON STREET
3001 MILLER ROAD
11801 MACKAVENUE
2101 CONNOR AVENUE
601 PIQUETTE
2500 £. GENERAL MOTORS BLVD
1 INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
e-3tOOVANSLYKERD
4555 GIDDINGS ROAD
401 N. VERLINDEN
920 TOWNSEND STREET
2100S.OPDYKERO.
381 11 VAN DYKE
21900 MOUND RD.
37625 MICHIGAN AVENUE
38303 MICHIGAN AVENUE
28801 WIXOM ROAD
)966 SOUTH MISSISSIPPI
HWY69
1050 DODGE DRIVE
1001 N HIGHWAY DRIVE
6290 N. LINDBERGH BLVD
1500 EAST ROUTE A
US HIGHWAY 1
1016 WEST EDGAR RD
199 BEEKMAN AVENUE
1000 JEEP WAY
4000 STICKNEY AVE.
650 MILLER ROAD
1 1000 STATE ROUTE 347 £
5401 BAUMHART ROAD
2300 HALLOCK-YOUNG RD
2400 HONDA PKWY
2601W.STROOPRD
7447 S.E. 74TH STREET
1400 HIGHWAY 101 SOUTH
983 NISSAN DRIVE
HWY 31 SOUTH
2525 EAST ABRAM STREET
2424 SPRINGFIELD AVE
1000 INDUSTRIAL AVE
CITY
FREMONT;: : :::::::
NEWARK
WILMINGTON
ATLANTA
DORAWLLLE
BELVIDERE
CHICAGO
NORMAL
FORT WAYNE
LAFAYETTE
FAIRFAX
BOWLING GREEN
GEORGETOWN
LOUISVILLE
LOUISVILLE
SHREVEPORT
BALTIMORE
BUICK CITY (FLINT)
DEARBORN
DETROIT
DETROIT
DETROIT
DETROtT-HAMTRAMCK
FLAT ROCK
FLINT
LAKE ORION
LANSING
LANSING
PONTIAC
STERLING HEIGHTS
WARREN
WAYNE
WAYNE
WIXOM
TWIN CITIES (ST. PAU
CLAYCOMO
ST. LOUIS
ST LOUIS
ST,LQUtS
WENTZVILLE
EDISON
LINDEN
N. TARRYTOWN
(M TOLEDO
#2 TOLEDO
AVON LAKE
E. LIBERTY
LORAIN
LORDSTOWN
MARYSVILLE
MORAINE
OKLAHOMA
GREER
SMYRNA
SPRING HILL
ARLINGTON
NORFOLK
JANESVILLE
ST
CA
DE
DE
GA
GA
L
IL
L
N
N
KS
KY
KY
KY
KY
LA
MD
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
MN
MO
MO
MO
BO
MO
NJ
NJ
NY
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OK
SC
TN
TN
TX
VA
Wl
EPA
RGN
0»: ;:
03
03
04
04
05
05
05
05
05
07
04
04
04
04
06
03
05
OS
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
03
05
05
05
05
05
OS
07
07
07
07
07
02
02
02
05
05
05
03
05
05
05
05
06
04
04
04
06
03
05
                                                        39

-------
                                                                                                     Auto Assembly Data Summary
                                                                                                                   Table B

Data pulled on July 1 3, 1 998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System







Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
T
»
9
10
11
12
IS
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
«
34
35
36
3?
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
' 45
46
«r
48
49
50
31
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
NAME
NUMM
CHRYSLER CORP
GENERAL MOTORS
FORD MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
CHRYSLER CORP.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
DIAMOND-STAR MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
SUBARIMSUZU
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS CORP
TOYOTA MOTOR MM
FORD MOTOR CO
FORD MOTOR CO. (KENTUCKY TRUCK
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
FORO MOTOR CO
CHRYSLER (NEW MACK AVE.)
CHRYSLER COftP, {JEFFERSON N)
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
AUTOALLIANCE INTL.
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS (C PLANT)
GENERAL MOTORS (M PLANT)
GENERAL MOTORS (EAST)
CHRYSLER CORP.
CHRYSLER CORP.
FORD MOTOR CO
FORO MOTOR CO (MICHIGAN TRUCK
FORD MOTOR CO
FORO MOTOR CO
FORD MOTOR CO
CHRYSLER CORP. (DODGE ORrVE)
CHRYSLER CORP. (N. HIGHWAY DRI
FORD MOTOR CO.
GENERAL MOTORS
FORO MOTOR CO.
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
CHRYSLER CORP. *1
CHRYSLER CORP. IB
FORD MOTOR CO.
HONDA OF AMERICA
FORD MOTOR CO
GENERAL MOTORS
HONDA OF AMERICA
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
BMW MANUFACTURING CORP
NISSAN MOTOR MFG.
GENERAL MOTORS (SATURN)
GENERAL MOTORS
FORO MOTOR CO.
GENERAL MOTORS

Inspections (2 years
Air

Total

Avaraga

2.1

1
0
2
3
3
1
1
4
1
0
2
0
1
NP
0
3
2
NP
S
NP
6
1
3
2
NP
2
NP
2
1
1
2
3
3
NP
1
2
2
2
3
3
2
1
1
1
NP
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
0
0
1
2
1
Water



A*a»sa
SaaNota 1
3.1

1
0
9
4
Id
2
1
4
*
0
2
3
16
4
3
5
r
3
8
0
2
1
4
3
4
5
1
6
1
3
2
5
5
2
2
3
2
2
3
4
5
4
2
2
d
1
3
1
5
2
S
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
Historical Noncomplance (QuartenV Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompHance
event) _ 	


Air

Avaiaga
SaaNota t
0.7

d
0
5
0
d
0
8
0
0
0
0
a
S
0
0
d
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
d
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
2
d
1
0
d
d
d
5
0
0
d
d
d
0
d
0
0
0
0
0
d
d
0
0
1
0


Wat*

Avaraga
SaaNote 1
2.4

0
0
d
0
d
0
7
0
d
0
d
8
t
8
8
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
d
5
«
0
d
8
8
8
d
8
0
8
8
0
d
5
d
5
S
8
d
0
8
0
d
0
0
0
d
4
d
0
d
0
d
0


RCRA

Av«»g.
SaaNota 1
2.8

0
0
0
0
2
8
8
0
8
0
8
a
2
4
3
2
0
0
3
0
3
0
1
0
7
8
3
3
4
4
0
0
d
2
1





0
0
1
d
a
0
0
a
a
1
0
1
d
1
0
0
d
8


A W R

Avaraga
SaaNotaJ
44

0
0
5
0
2
a
8
d
a
0
g
8
B
a
a
2
d
1
5
0
3
0
1
5
a
a
3
8
a
a
0
8
2
e
B
8
a
a
a
8
a
a
1
d
a
0
d
a
a
1
0
5
d
1
0
0
1
a

Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
f 01
pollutants
ovar Imt

Average
See Note 1
1.6

0
NP
2
Q
d
0
d
0
0
0
0
i
t
2
2
0
d
0
0
NP
6
NP
NP
d
0
0
NP
1
0
0
d
d
d
d
2
0
Nf4
o
d
0
d
d
NP
2
2
NP
1
d
d
0
NP
0
NP
NP
0
0
0
0

* of poMants
regulated

Average
SaaNotal
7.3

d
NP
10
0
d
6
9
0
0
0
0
11
10
10
11
0
6
19
8
NP
d
NP
NP
0
3
5
NP
6
0
4
6
0
9
d
S
0
NP
0
d
d
5
7
NP
6
8
NP
E
4
d
4
NP
5
NP
NP
0
0
0
0

• of raports
over Nmrt

Average
SaaNota 1
7.7

d
NP
2
d
d
0
d
d
0
0
d
3
3
9
16
0
d
0
0
NP
d
NP
NP
0
d
0
NP
3
0
0
d
0
0
d
4
d
NP
0
d
0
0
0
NP
5
31
NP
1
0
d
0
NP
0
NP
NP
d
0
0
0

a of reports
submitted

Average
SaaNotal
409.0

0
NP
U4
0
0
54
:756
d
0
0
0
629
830
1.103
i,»r
d
so
719
903
NP
d
NP
NP
d
«9
25
NP
112
0
92
151
0
«87
d
1S1
d
HP
0
0
0
276
185
NP
342
1,1*8
NP
135
84
d
62
NP
92
NP
NP
a
0
0
0

Significant NoncompNance Indicator


Air

r-Bcitbas
SaaNotal
20.7*

N
N
Y
N
V
N
¥
N
N
N
N
N
n
NP
N
N
N
NP
N
NP
N
N
N
N
NP
Y
NP
Y
V
N
¥
Y
Y
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
NP
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N


Water
Parcant of
FaciMies
SaaNota 1
0.0%

H
NP
N
N
N
N
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
NP
NP
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
H
N
NP
N
N
NP
H
N
N
N
NP
N
NP
NP
N
N
N
N


RCRA

Facilities
SaaNotal
1.7%

N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N


A*W*R

Avaraga
SaaNota 3
0.2

d
0
t
d
1
d
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
a
0
0
0
0
0
d
0
a
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
f
1
1
0
0
0
0
d
0
0
d
d
d
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
t
o
0
0
D
0
T
0

Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years


Air

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
0.2

d
0
1
d
0
0
1
0
d
0
d
0
0
NP
d
0
d
NP
d
NP
6
0
d
0
NP
0
NP
0
d
d
d
1
d
NP
d
0
d
0
d
0
3
1
d
0
NP
0
d
d
d
0
d
0
d
0
0
0
1
0


wafer

Average
SaaNota 1
d.O

0
NP
d
0
d
0
d
0
d
0
d
0
0
0
0
0
d
d
d
NP
d
NP
NP
d
0
0
NP
0
0
0
d
0
d
0
0
0
HP
0
d
0
d
1
NP
0
d
NP
d
0
d
0
NP
0
NP
NP
0
0
Q
0


RCRA

Avarage
SaaNota t
0.1

d
0
d
d
ft
0
d
0
1
0
o
d
9
0
d
0
d
0
0
0
6
0
d
0
0
1
d
0
ft
0
d
0
d
0
0
d
0
0
ft
2
d
1
d
0
a
d
d
0
d
0
d
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0


Total

Avarasa
Saa Nota 1
0.2

Q
0
1
d
0
0
t
0
1
0
d
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
Q
1
0
d
0
0
D
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
2
3
3
0
0
d
0
D
d
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
T
0
Note 1: Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2: Average of number of quarters with a violation or rroncompliance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act. Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs In which faciilies are considered to be in significant noncompKance. (maximum vafcie=3)
Note 4: This indcator is NOT comparable across industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector: Automobile Assembly: vehiclestyear; Pulp Mils: short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short tons/year, Nonferrous Metals, metric tons/year
Note 5. This indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors. Average Is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 6: Average of those with at least one soil reported.
Note 7: Average of those with a spill amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID* identified: NC = value not calculated: Inact = inactive permit/ID*

                                                                                                                       40

-------
                                                                                        Auto Assembly Data Summary
                                                                                                     Table C

Data puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System






Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
43
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
NAME
NUMMI
CHRYSLER CORP
GENERAL MOTORS
FORD MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
CHRYSLER CORP.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
DIAMOND-STAR MOTORS
GENERAL. MOTORS
SUBARU-ISUZU
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
TOYOTA MOTOR MFC
FORD MOTOR CO.
FORD MOTOR COi (KENTUCKY TRUCK
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
FORD MOTOR CO,
CHRYSLER (NEW MACK AVE.)
CHRYSLER CORP. (JEFFERSON N)
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
AUTOALLIANCE INTL
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS (C PLANT)
GENERAL MOTORS (M PLANT)
GENERAL MOTORS (EAST)
CHRYSLER CORP
CHRYSLER CORP.
FORD MOTOR CO
FORD MOTOR CO. (MICHIGAN TRUCK
FORD MOTOR CO
FORD MOTOR CO
FORD MOTOR CO
CHRYSLER CORP. (DODGE DRIVE)
CHRYSLER CORP (N HIGHWAY DRI
FORD MOTOR CO.
GENERAL MOTORS
FORD MOTOR CO.
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
CHRYSLER CORP »1
CHRYSLER CORP. *2
FORD MOTOR CO.
HONDA OF AMERICA.
FORD MOTOR CO
GENERAL MOTORS
HONDA OF AMERICA
GENERAL MOTORS
GENERAL MOTORS
BMW MANUFACTURING CORP
NISSAN MOTOR MFG.
GENERAL MOTORS (SATURN)
GENERAL MOTORS
FORD MOTOR CO.
GENERAL MOTORS


Production

veNcles/Year

Average
See Notes 144
206.271

365.469
36.500
124,168
277.791
33,771
247.256
276.722
192.961
231.116
194.871
194,130
12.282
385.657
252.871
252,871
162.301
193.901
227.261
130,488
1.669
307.023
26.851
152.838
149.771
62.547
170.378
182,950
175.484
269,689
232.767
189:509
469.536
469,596
145,035
156,700
218,337
147,905
313,010
233,020
54,240
127,939
178.172
59,539
256.617
122.989
209.912
299,991
313.003
424,462
267,891
131,923
11,473
465,786
3(4.321
89.634
212.675
256.455


TRI Releases

1 996 -Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
819,459

649.970
105,655
581,039
930.635
395,523
248.094
630,282
393,912
1.979,691
1.121,343
847,221
104.610
2.J82.850
846,487
2.385, J1 2
485.927
608,563
955.592
473,653
Inact
447,021
16.372
923.862
1.437,470
268.530
601.972
513,130
350,435
1,752,722
337,269
562.987
1,198.097
800.459
512.095
622,013
2,652.138
585,931
541.537
1,849,428
905.130
448.415
309.979
206,750
1.207.328
1,033
906.666
390,755
835,870
440.ZS3
1,213,399
626,830
695.521
Inact
1.835.957
1.09*076
783,070
1.184,900
838.649


TRI Transfers

1996- Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
942.277

376.915
168,193
578,566
579,595
443,423
105.548
1,465.760
5,569.048
1.590770
386.920
492,661
263.441
3,525,194
1.967.548
6.753
390.697
560.151
334.458
274,817
Inact
1,144,922
49.633
368.746
470,607
694.138
709.042
501,119
204,947
1,376,590
311.793
530.006
739.404
1.040,717
51,634
855,545
2,423.610
492,7*6
75.365
1,488.940
459.565
648.67*
335,024
306,050
162,406
4,882
912,017
602.780
578,560
397,195
8.616,032
1,001,000
624.039
Inact
995.740
1.806.866
645,887
56.770
1,848.343
TRI Releases *
Transfers per
Production Unit

pounds/ production units

Averege
See Notes 145
95

2,8
7.5
9.3
54
24,8
14
7.5
307
15,5
7.7
6.7
300
15.1
11.1
95
5.4
60
5.7
5.7
NC
5,2
25
8;5
127
18,6
77
3.6
32
11.6
2.8
6.5
4.1
3,9
3.9
8.4
233
7.8
20
-14.3
252
6,6
s'e
6.6
53
NC
148
4.7
4.7
2,7
232
5.7
10.0
NC
61
9.2
15.9
5.9
	 10.4

TRI Releases -
Carcinogens

1996 - Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
4.222

500
0
39
88
0
14.126
0
0
481
0
47
3.687
47.901
0
8.813
229
48
130
45
Inact
99
0
125
255
255
155
0
250
591
15,600
7.450
82

0
0
347
2,147
26.641
364
2.350
0
11
0
10.980
0
271
3.750
0
4,210
13.039
260
296
Inect
9,771
60,629
0
0
320
TRI Releases «
Transfers -
Metals

1996 -Total Pounds

Average
Sea Note 1
264,931

46.515
4.000
750
26.461
4.08?
19,650
25.915
1,937.807
2S3.7P2
8.178
13,099
0
2.627,436
34.869
5.092
7,398
25.680
90,990
168,260
Inact
60,138
0
15,263
59,833
719.505
47.659
18,192
2,020
16,785
23,408
22,909
27,319
23.870
8,702
10,745
58,841
7,24j
18.834
24,600
1.905
6 14.4
1l!o38
0
41,953
1,800
34,835
1,020
8,062
87.577
7.872.932
1,000
6.656
Inact
27.451
O55.473
663
870
	 6,165

TRI Production -
Related Waste

1996- Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
2,197.907

1.292,647
278,204
1,226,907
1,656,361
669, t88
396.238
2.1B1,5M
6.095,232
3.568,866
1.795,447
1,440,332
381.399
6.881,088
3,491,462
4,676,708
873,169
1.328.076
1,919.521
2,154,248
Inact
2,116,798
65.766
1,408,667
1.929,864
1,326,013
1,858.212
1,403,232
621,891
4,090,824
708.416
1,122,280
3,040.948
2.742.622
3.262.350
1,744,625
5,952,880
1,184748
1,208,664
3.533,972
1,404,060

718,656
532,595
1,887,261
5,892
2,546,058
1,231,040
1.468,402
3.261.166
10,038,392
1,626,760
1.371,576
Inact
3.136,294
3.359,830
1,795,869
2.364,530
	 3,149,942


Pomtant Spills

Spil Occurrence
Percent of Fecihbes


224%

N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
1
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
M
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
ast 2 years)

f ot SplHS

Average
See Note 6
1.7



1
2
1






1

1



7
1



1



1

1






2
1




2







Amourt Soiled (bs)

Average
SeeNote7
809



112

350








458



3,118


















7












Surrounding
Population
Residents within
3mttos

Average
See Note 1
62.166

29.928
58.352
92.407
47,451
62,136
18.167
71J522
10.083
2,496
4.708
37,717
7.258
2r?93
35.056
60,494
10.506
122,494
115.593
126,308
200.839
157441
201.229
189.879
36.825
62,166
20,361
94.947
81.913
52,066
97,579
156548
67.113
56.631
19,099
117.608
20,215
40,495
36,733
79.026
13.382
80202
126.445

143.077
21.985
17,429
6540
788
48.930
564
9,766
2,476
93,657
109,263
Note 1  Average is calculated across al entries with value o( 0 or greater.
Note 2  Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3  Average number of programs in which faciities are considered to be in significant noncompliBnce. (maximum value=3)
Note 5  ™! !naca£!! NOT cZ^nt '"ol! InST 'T' I* "**.***'°*l° ' '«*«• Aul°™blle ***'«*»  vehicles/year; Pulp Mills: short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mills: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Nc£ 6  A«C of Use with a°^east o^e sPi"ep^rted       *         " "^'^ "* ""* *"** USln9 "* lh°Se obs«rv»l'°'» «* nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 7  Average of those with a soil amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID* identified:  NC * value not calculated: Inact = inactive permit/ID*

                                                                                                                    41

-------

-------
                                       Pulp Manufacturers Location  Data
                                                     Table A
Data pufled on Juty 13, 199B from Integrated Data tor Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
1
2
2
4
9
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
IT
18
19
20
21
22
2}
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
3}
34
32
36
37
38
39
40
«1
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
S3
54
55
56
57
58
NAME
KETCHIKANPyLPCO. : : : !
CONTAINER CORP. OF AMERICA
OS AU1ANCE COOSA PINES CORP
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
GULF STATES PAPER CORP
BOISE CASCADE CORP
GAF MATERIALS CORP
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
SCOTT PAPER CO,
JAMES RIVER CORP.
ALABAMA RIVER PULP COMPANY INC
MEAD COATED BOARD INC.
MACMILLAN 8LOEDEL INC
UNION CAMP CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
MEAD CORP.
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP,
POTLATCH CORP
GREEN BAY PACKAGING INC
GAYLORD CONTAINER CORP
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
WISCONSIN TISSUE - WESTERN OPE
STONE CONTAINER CORP
SIMPSON PAPER CO.
GAYLORD CONTAINER CORP
SIMPSON PAPER COMPANY, HUMBOLD
SIMPSON PAPER CO
SMURFIT NEWSPRINT CORP OF CAL
LOUISIANA*PACIF1C CORP
B.J. FIBRES
REPROCELL
THE DEXTER CORP
NVFCO
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP
JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION
RAYONIER FERNANOINA MILL
ATLAS PAPER MILLS LTD
JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORP.
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION
STONE CONTAINER CORP
BUCKEYE FLORIDA L R
ST. JOE FOREST PRODUCTS CO
AUGUSTA NEWSPRINT CO.
FEDERAL PAPER BOARD CO INC
PONOSROSA GEORGIA
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
GEORGIA'PACIFIC CORP.
PACKAGING CORP. OF AMERICA
SOUTHEAST PAPER MFG. CO.
RAYONIER
RIVERWOOD INTL GEORGIA INC
WEYERHAEUSER CO
STONE SAVANNAH RIVER PULP & PA
INTERSTATE PAPER CORP
FORT HOWARD CORP,
INLAND PAPERBOARD AND PACKAGIN
STREET ADDRESS
PO.BOX8600 :::;;
USHWY31 S

COUNTY LINE RD. 29
28270 US HIGHWAY 80
307 W. INDUSTRIAL RD.
2400 EMOGENE ST
P.O. BOX 2448
P.O. BOX 2447
NAHEOLA MILL HC 66
COUNTY RD 3*
P.O. BOX 940
ALABAMA HWY 10
100 JENSEN RD
PO BOX 1409
P.O. BOX H
PO BOX 496
1944 ADAMS AVSW
PO BOX 3333
HIGHWAY 4. NEAR ROHWER
PO BOX 711
1701 JEFFERSON PKWY
PO BOX 7069
1600 E BUTLER AVENUE
PO BOX lie
21091 HAWES RD.
2301 WILBUR AVE
1900 BENDIXSEN STREET
100 ERIE ST.
2205 W MT. VERNON AVE
#1LPDR
2701 S. BIRCH ST.
9147OSGARMOAVE
2 ELM ST.
MARSHALL BROS MILL
375 MUSCOGEE RD.
N EIGHTH ST.
FOOT OF GUM STREET
372SE10THCT.
1915WIGMOREST.
STATE ROAD 316
PAPER «. PULP DIV.
ONE BUCKEYE DRIVE
PO BOX 190
PO BOX 1847
AUGUSTA OPERA HWY 56 S
COOKIE RD, EXT
W. 9TH ST.

HWY 31 S
709 PAPER MILL ROAD
JESUP MILL
1 00 RIVERWOOD WAY
STAGECOACH RD.
1 BONNYBRIOGE RD
2366 INTERSTATE PAPER ROAD
393 FORT HOWARD ROAIX : '
238 MAYS BRIDGE ROAD
CITY
KETCHIKAN:; 	 :: :;::::
BREWTON
COOSA PINES
COURTLAND
DEMOPOL1E
JACKSON
MOBILE
MOBILE
MOBILE
PENNINGTON
PERDUE HILL
PHOENIX CITY
PINE HILL
PRATTVILLE
SELMA
STEVENSON
ASHDOWN
CAMDEN
CROSSET
MCGEHEE
MORR1LTON
PINE BLUFF
PWE BLUFF
FLAGSTAFF
SNOWFLAKE
ANDERSON
ANTIQCH
SAMOA
POMONA
POMONA
SAMOA
SANTA ANA
SUN VALLEY
WINDSOR LOCKS
YORKLYN
CANTONMENT
FERNANOINA BEACH
FERNANDINA MILL
HIALEAH
JACKSONVILLE
RAIATKA
PANAMA CITY
PERRY
PORT ST. JOE
AUGUSTA
AUGUSTA
AUGUSTA
BRUNSWICK
CEDAR SPRINGS
CLYATTSVILLE
DUBLIN
JESUP
MACON
OGLETHORPE
PORTWENTWORTH
RICEBORO
RiNCpN .:- : : :;: ^-\\^^:\'-'-\\
ROME
ST
AK
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CT
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
EPA
RGN
10 :
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
06
06
06
06
06
06
OS
09
OS
09
09
09
08
09
09
09
09
01
03
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
O4
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
94
04'::::
04
                                                    43

-------
                                                                                                   Pulp Manufacturers Data Summary
                                                                                                                   Table B

Dais puled on July 13, 1 998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System






Sector Statistics
Row.
1
2
3
4
i
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
is
16
1?
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
S3
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
S3
54
55
56
57
58
NAME
KETCHIKANPULPCO.
CONTAINER CORP. OF AMERICA
U.S. ALLIANCE COOSA PINES CORP
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
GULF STATES PAPER CORP
BOISE CASCADE CORP
GAF MATERIALS CORP,
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
SCOTT PAPER CO.
JAMES RIVER CORP.
ALABAMA RIVER RAP COMPANY INC
MEAD COATED BOARD INC.
MACMIILAN 8LOEDEL INC
UNION CAMP CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
MEAD CORP.
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP:
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.
POTLATCH CORP.
GREEN BAY PACKAGING INC
GAYLORD CONTAINER CORP-
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
WISCONSIN TISSUE • WESTERN OPE
STONE CONTAINER CORP:
SIMPSON PAPER CO
GAYLORO CONTAINER CORP
SIMPSON PAPER COMPANY, HUMBOLD
SIMPSON PAPER CO
SMURFIT NEWSPRINT CORP OF CAL
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORP.
B J FIBRES
REPROCELL
THE DEXTER CORP
NVFCO.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP
JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION
RAYONIER FERNANOINA MILL
ATLAS PAPER MILLS LTD.
JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORP
QEQftGWtf PACIFIC CORPOR ATION
STONE CONTAINER CORP
BUCKEYE FLORIDALP.
ST. JOE FOREST PRODUCTS CO.
AUGUSTA NEWSPRINT co.
FEDERAL PAPER BOARD CO. INC.
PON DEROSA GEORGIA
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP;
PACKAGING CORP. OF AMERICA
SOUTHEAST PAPER WFG. CO.
RAYONIER
RIVERWOOD INTl GEORGIA INC
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
STONE SAVANNAH RIVER PULP* PA
INTERSTATE PAPER CORP
FORT HOWARD t»RP:
INLAND PAPERBOARD AND PACKAGIN

nspections (2 years)
Air

TOM

Average
See Note 1
3.1

NP
2
3
6
5
5
:4
6
4
7
4
5
S
3
8
6
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
1
4
2
2
NP
2
2
2
NP
NP
2
2
NP
4
4
NP
2
1
2
1
2
2
4
NP
4
4
4
3
5
S
4
4
5
3
4
Water

Tow

Auriga
See Note 1
27

3
2
2
3
2
1
0
2
3
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
3
2
2
2
5
NP
NP
3
1
0
NP
NP
4
NP
NP
3
13
3
4
5
NP
6
6
NP
4
0
NP
NP
NP
4
S
NP
1
2
0
4
6
2
4
5
RCRA

Total

Anrw
See Note 1
0.5

0
1
11
2
1
3
B
2
2
0
NP
4
1
0
»
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
»
0
0
NP
NP
0
1
0
3
0
NP
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
NP
3
8
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0


Total

Average
See Note 1
5.4

3
5
16
11
8
9
:4
10
4
9
5
10
8
5
10
7
5
4
5
5
4
4
8
2
4
5
J
0
2
2
6
NP
NP
c
1C
3
11
9
NP
8
*
4
5
2
2
4
NP
11
7
4
4
7
6
8
11
7
7
9
Historical Noncompiance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompKance
event)


Air

Average
See Note 1
1.0

0
5
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
5
6
0
1
1
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
NP
NP:
0
5
0
0
0
NP
0
0
2
0
5
0
3
NP
1
0
0
0
0
S
0
0
1
0
0


Water

Average
SM Note 1
1.6

S
1
1
2
3
2
0
2
0
1
1
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
o
NP
NP
3
8
0
3
3
NP
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
NP
0
0
0
0
0
£>
0
0
0
0
0


RCRA

Amg.
See Note 1
06

0
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
1
0
0
a
a
0
0
D
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NP
NP
8
9
0
2
0
NP
0
6
8
D
4
0
8
NP
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0


A W. R

Average
See Note 2
26

S
5
4
3
3
2
1
2
0
5
1
4
1
0
5
6
0
1
t
0
6
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
NP
NP
a
9
0
S
3
NP
4
a
8
0
5
0
8
NP
1
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
1
0.
0

Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
for
poejtarts
overkmit

Average
SaaNotal
2.0

3
3
1
0
3
0
0
0
2
1
2
4
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
NP
NP
1
0
0
NP
NP
0
NP
NP
6
3
2
3
1
NP
1
2
NP
a
0
NP
NP
NP
0
1
NP
2
1
0
1
3
0
D
3

< or poManls
ragulatad

Aww
SaaNota 1
125

31
7
11
12
9
8
0
12
10
9
15
18
11
11
12
16
11
17
8
11
8
4
12
NP
NP
13
12
0
NP
NP
0
NP
HP
44
7
S
19
14
NP
11
«
NP
11
0
NP
NP
NP
13
5
NP
6
6
0
7
S
9
6
7

a of reports
over kmt

Average
SaaNota 1
60

10
9
Z
0
6
0
0
0
4
1
S
e
0
0
0
7
ft
1
1
0
9
0
0
NP
NP
2
0
0
NP
NP
0
NP
NP
17
22
24
r
2
NP
1
4
NP
0
0
NP
NP
NP
0
J
NP
3
2
0
1
16
0
0
9

* or raports
submitted

/tarn.
See Note 1
3824

•f/139
200
441
370
2*5
285
0
487
549
133
191
309
341
206
114
356
-140
363
216
408
130
92
225
NP
:NP
329
56
0
NP
NP
0
NP
NP
3,208
198
138
253
370
NP
296
852
NP
267
0
NP
NP
NP
178
554
NP
117
122
0
85
122
144
-134
374

Significant Noncomplisnce Incf catof


Air
Percent ol
Fecikfies
See Note 1
19.4%

NP
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
HI
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
NP
N
N
N
NP
tff>
N
Y
NP
N
N
NP
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
NP
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y


water
Percent or
Faciihes
Sea Note 1
7.7%

N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
NP
N
N
N
NP
NP
N
NP
NP
N
N
N
Y
N
NP
N
N
NP
N
N
NP
NP
NP
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N


RCRA
Percent ol
Facilities

6"o%

N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N:
N
N
NP
NP
N
N
N
N
N
:NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N


A*W*R

Average
Sea Note 3
0.3

0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
9
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
o
0
1
«
0
0
0
1
0

-------
                                                                                       Pulp Manufacturers Data Summary
                                                                                                        Table C

Dala pulled on Juty 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data tor Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System





Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
i
4
5
6
r
s
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1?
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
5?
58
NAME
KETCHIKAN PULP CO.
CONTAINER CORP. OF AMERICA
U.S. ALLIANCE COOSA PINES CORP
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
GULF STATES PAPER CORP
BOISE CASCADE CORP
GAF MATERIALS CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
SCOTT PAPER CO: ':
JAMES RIVER CORP.
ALABAMA RIVER PULP COMPANY INC
MEAD COATED BOARD INC
MACMILLAN 8LOED61 INC
UNION CAMP CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
MEAD CORP
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
POTLATCH CORP
GREEN BAY PACKAGING INC
GAYLORD CONTAINER CORP
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
WISCONSIN TISSUE- WESTERN OPE
STONE CONTAINER CORP:
SIMPSON PAPER CO
GAYLORD CONTAINER CORP.
SIMPSON PAPER COMPANY. HUMBOLD
SIMPSON PAPER CO.
SMURFIT NEWSPRINT CORP. OF CAL
LOUISIANA-PACIFiC CORP.
B.J. FIBRES
REPROCELL
THE DEXTER CORP
NVFCO,
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP
JEFFERSON SMUHFIT CORPORATION
RAYONIER FERNANDINA MILL
ATtAS PAPER MW.LS LTD.
JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORP
GEORGIA? PACIFIC CORPOfiATlOr*
STONE CONTAINER CORP
BUCKEYE FLORIDA. LP.
ST JOE FOREST PRODUCTS CO
AUGUSTA NEWSPRINT CO.
FEDERAL PAPER BOARD CO. INC
PONOEROSA GEORGIA
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP:
PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA
SOUTHEAST PAPER MFG. CO.
RAYONIER
RIVERWOOD INTL GEORGIA INC
WEYERHAEUSER CO
STONE SAVANNAH RIVER PULP* PA
NTERSTATE PAPER CORP
FORT HOWARD CORP
NLAND PAPERBOARD AND PACKAGIN

Production

Short Tons/Day

Average
See Notes IS 4
1,0)S

600
1,500
1.980
1,940
990
670
120
1.403
1.665
1,270
1.Z50
2,525
2,100
2,600
1,370
1,030
2.600
719
1.530
836
1,500
500
1,630
90
1,330
400
1.000
640
140
420
700
125
250

20
1.490
2.700
430
5$
950
1.44$
1.735
1.298
1,400
1.045
1.860
180
2.221
2.S35
1.250
1.Z50
1.470
1,550
890
1,700
760
2,300

TRI Releases

1990 - Total Pounds

Average
SMNote 1
1,009,463

1.878,162
2.600.094
2.198,882
2,451.468
984.865
649.119
NP
1,660,730
2.055,180
1.622.084
1.386,580
3,594.342
1,560.626
2.065.710
1,006.255
549,149
1,031,662
1,024,016
1.220.382
451,629
624,848
434,670
1,432,045
NP
2.006,062
158.607
;io
Inact
Inect
Inact
1,911.107
Inact
NP
45,965
28,313
1,017,887
1,780,550
1,311.142
Inad
769.001
964,028
1.776,667
1.875,007
660,275
68,400
1.697,127
0
1.982,478
3.07r,<40
1.138.020
154,184
1.012.518
1,087,115
499,091
839,123
174,462
589,835
3009004

TRI Transfers

1996 - Total PouTds

Average
SMNotel
201,719

5,800
0
61.120
0
0
0
NP
0
10.364
0
0
0
150,505
0
3.300
0
9.000
0
0
0
0
2,199
0
NP
0
2,616
0
Inact
Mad
Inact
0
Inact
NP
250
13.824
19.219
0
0
Inact
9,526
0
5.001,036
0
218,250
132,703
170
0
0
510
0
0
160
39,586
0
0
0
0
0
TRI Releases *
Transfers per
Production Unit

pounds/ production lots

Average
Saa Notas 14 5
1178.0

3,139,9
1,733.4
1.141,4
1,2636
1,0367
968.8
NC
1.183.7
1.240-7
1.277.2
1.109,5
1,423.5
8148
794.5
736.9
5332
4003
1,4242
797,6
540.2
416.6
873.7
8786
NC
1,5043
403.1
0,0
NC
NC
NC
2,730.2
NC
NC
NC
2.10E.9
696.0
6632
3.049.2
NC
8195
661.9
3,906.5
1.448,1
627.5
192.*
912.5
NC
8926
1.048.6
910.4
123,4
S88.9
7269
560.8
493.6
229.6
NC
1,308.3

TRI Releases •
Carcinogens

1996 • Total Pounds

Axrasa
Sa«Nola 1
94.718

172,002
292,360
97.66Z
142.625
99,305
68.300
NP
90.755
734,000
83,789
179.410
217,226
112,370
204.009
91,900
70,769
246;355
56.138
: 79.844
101,798
37,195
34,025
54,000
NP
149,484
0
0
Inact
mad
Inact
32,005
Inact
NP
0
0
135,100
182,350
67.584
Inact
44,953
17T,5?2
66.060
163,127
60,005
0
175,165
0
90,926
189,729
70.005
0
136.080
62,000
21.344
43,617
o
70,900
	 149.750
TRI Releases •>
Transfers -
Metals

1996 - Total Pounds

Average
SMNote 1
39.143

0
0
0
22,000
0
3.131
NP
0
0
53,419
0
0
174,200
164,900
110,048
0
42,730
0
520:655
4,354
7,555
13,905
0
NP
0
0
0
Inact
Inact
Inact
0
Inact
Nf>
0
42,137
0
0
0
Inact
650
0
144,470
0
0
0
17,905
0
465,276
580,800
0
29;S58
0
1,700
0
0
Q
239,350
140,000

TRI Production -
Related Waste

1996 - Total Pounds

A-rag.
SaaNdtal
7,129.139

1.852,700
9,749,384
4:693,400
26.950.848
$.845,292
8,689.448
NP
18.116,064
24,651,832
19,763.088
17:628,7:20
11,294.784
8786,040
8,347,900
16,437.288
950,700
32.S46.176
3.613.270
12,019,696
5,783,068
3,203,850
1,526.079
13,835,424
NP
2.386.528
2.450.228
20
Inact
Inact
Inact
5,101,108
Inact
NP
50.416
10.819,884
15,163,048
11,897,896
10.919.200
Inact
2.464.360
5,654,876
7,378,732
46.418,992
7,314,968
201,t03
17.039'552
499,005
27,239744
9,526.232
3,442.692
570.603
26,609,792
5.166,296
8.830.536
5,138,932
2 664 016
1396!70a
19.735,344

Polutant Spils as) 2 years)

Spit Occurrence
Percent ol
Faciktaes

37.7*

¥
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
H
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y

* 01 Spls

Average
Saa Note 6
3.6

57
1


1


2

2
2

3

3
4

2



1



1




5





3
2



1

2
8
7
f
7
1
	 17

Amount Spiled (»s)

Average
See Note r
11,879

13,93)



6,406


1,008

24
1:925

218

54,400
400

5,000







2




73





16
408



40

3,300
24,560
134,588
20
827
26,400
166,815

Surrounding
Population
Res dents vwthin 3
miles

Avarage
Saa Note 1
24,957

1,804
6.351
3.114
749

4,901
94,549
40.456
36.899

957
2,928

14,492

2,326
6.299
11,890
W.13Z
3,274
1,389
41,175

34,222

10,943
46.045
23,560
134,606
160,068
14,704
246,280
246.280
28.395
15.801
6,604
6,70C
6.708
195,073
72.S26
6,717
32.754
3.394
3,434
3.28C
9.325
14 414
2l!si1
1.342
2.673
3.294
34,176
4.410
S,7S8
2,524
Note 1  Average is calculated across al entries witti value of 0 or greater.
Note 2  Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs in which facilities are considered to be in significant noncomplance. (maximum value=3)
Note 4  This Indicator Is NOT comparable across industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector: Automobile Assembly vehic
                                                                                                              itions with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 5 This indicator Is NOT co™.r.hi. .,,nc..~*  i' "„  " A	,"PP£?'!yi°.t *"*? Automobile Assembly: vehicles/year; Pulp Mils: short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
mote o ints inacator is NUI comparable across Industry sectors. Average is calculated for each sector using onry those observatioi	•"	'•--	-..  -.  ..      	_.        ._                                                       '
Note 6 Average of those with at least one spil reported.
Note 7 Average of those with a spil amount reported
NP = no permit/ID* identified; NC = value not calculated; Inact = inactive permit/ion
                                                                                                                45

-------
                                     Pulp Manufacturers Location Data
                                                   Table A
Data puled on JJy 13,1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
58
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
66
69
70
?<
72
75
74
75
76
77
78
79
BO
81
92
13
84
ts
96
»7
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
as
96
97
98
99
too
101
102
103
104
W5
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
11S
116
NAME
UNION CAMP CORP, :::::;:: -:: 	 :;.;;;
OILMAN PAPER CO
POTLATCHCORP,
CHICAGO TISSUE CO L.P.
THE CELOTEX CORP
KIEFFER PAPER MILLS. INC.
THE WESTON PAPER i MFC CO
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC.
WESTVACOCOHP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
GAYLORO CONTAINER CORP.
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC.
BOISE CASCADE CORP.
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
INTERNATK3NAL PAPS) CD.
THE CELOTEX CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
JAMES RIVER CORP.
RIVERWOOO INTERNATIONAL CORP;
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
BAY STATE PAPER COi
ERVINC INDUSTRIES INC.
SCHWBTZER.MAUDUJT NTERNATfON
ESLEECK MANUFACTURING CO. INC.
WESTVACOCORP
STATLER TISSUE CO.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
GREAT NORTHERN PAPER INC.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
LINCOLN PULP 1 PAPER CO.. INC.
MADISON PAPER INDUSTRIES
JAMES RIVER CORP.
MEAD OXFORD CORPORATION. WJMFO
S.D. WARREN CO.
SO WARREN CO,
KIMBERLY CLARK TISSUE COMPANY
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.
AMERICAN FIBRIT INC.
MEAD CORP.
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.
PACKAGING CORP, Of AMERICA
MANISTIOUE PAPERS INC
S.D. WARREN CO.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
MENASHACORP.
POTIATCHCOHP.
LAKE SUPERIOR PAPER INDUSTRIES
BLANDIN PAPER CO,
BOISE CASCADE CORP.
HENNEPIN PAPER CO
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
CERTAINTEEOCORP.
WEYERHAEUSER CO
NEWSPRINT: SOUTH INC,
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
INTERNATIONAl PAPER CO
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
STREET ADDRESS
POBQXS70 	 :::•:•:;:; ::::-"-".;:;;:;";:
PO BOX 878
805 MILL RD
13101 S. PULASKI RD.
901 S FRONT ST.
1220 W. SPRING ST.
2401 PRAJRIETON AVE.
PO BOX 130
PO BOX 278
70S COLLIERS LANE
4TH STREET
PO BOX 377
HWY1«W
MILL ST.
PO BOX 999
7500 FOURTH ST
POBOXSW*
PO BOX 21 8
1000JONESBORORD,
PO BOX 430
892 RIVER ST
123 E. MAIN ST.
701 GREYLOCK STREET
CANAL ST.
300 PRATT ST.
PO BOX 1050
PO BOX 1200
50 MAIN ST.

50 KATAHDIN AVE
MAIN ST.
PORTLAND ST.
J5 HARTFORD ST
RFD3
89 CUMBERLAND ST
14BENTONAVE.
60 MAIN ST
76 ARMSTRONG RD
poBax»7:
2425 KING HWY.
PO BOX 316
453SMACKINACAVE.
2400LAKESHOREDR.
PO BOX 211
ONE SUPERIOR WAY
320 N FARMER ST.
207 AVE. C.
100 N CENTRAL AVE.
11SFIR$TST SW
SECOND ST. & THIRD AVE.
POBOX90
100E. SARTELLST.
3303 4THAVE. 6.
CARSON ROAD
PQ8OX.54S
PO BOX 608
6901GRIERSONST
PO BOX 311
CITY
SAVANNAH::: 	 .;;;;:::::• 	 '
ST. MARYS
UBWISTON
ALSIP
OLflNCY
BROWNSTOWN
TERRE HAUTE
HAWESVILLE
WICKtlFfE
BASTROP
BOGALUSA
CAMPTI
DERIOOER
HODGE
MANSFIELD
MARRERO
PINEVtUe
SAINT FRANCISVIL
WEST MONROE
ZACHARY
BOSTON
ERVING
LEE
TURNERS FALLS
WW
AUGUSTA
BUCKSPORT
EAST MILLINOCKET
JAY
LINCOLN
MADISON
OLD TOWN
RUMFORO
SKOWHEGAN
WESTBROOK
WINSLOW
WOODLAND
BATTLE CREEK
EBCANABA
KALAMAZOO
MANI9TEE
MANISTIOUE
MUSKEGON
NORWAY
ONTONAGON
OTSEGO
CLOOUET
DULUTH
OTAND RAPtpS
INTERNATIONAL FA
UTTLE FALLS
SARTELL
SHAKOPEE
COLUMBUS
GRENADA
MONTICELLO
MOSS POINT
NATCHEZ
ST
QA
GA
ID
IL
It
IN
IN
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MD
ME
ME
ME
ME
ME
ME
ME
ME
ME
ME
ME
ME
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Mt
Ml
Ml
Ml
MM
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
EPA
RGN
04
04
0;
05
di
05
K
04
04
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
0$
06
06
06
01
01
01
01
03
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
05
D5
05
OS
as
05
05
0&
05
05
05
OS
05
05
05
05
04
04
04
04
04

-------
                                                                                                  Pulp Manufacturers Data Summary
                                                                                                                   Table B

Data puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System






Sector Statistics
Row»
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
59
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
NAME
UNION CAMP ottRP1. 	
OILMAN PAPER CO.
POTLATCH CORP.
CHICAGO TISSUE CO LP
THE CELOTEX CORP
KIEFFER PAPER MILLS, INC.
THE VVESTON PAPER t MFC CO
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC.
WESTVACOCORP
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
GAYLORO CONTAINER CORP.
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC
BOISE CASCADE CORP.
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
THE CELOTEX CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
JAMES RIVER CORP
RIVERWOOO INTERNATIONAL CORP.
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.
BAY STATE PAPER CO.
ERVING INDUSTRIES INC
SCHWEITZER-MAUDUIT INTERNATION
ESLEECK MANUFACTURING CO INC
WESTVACOCOHP
STATLER TISSUE CO.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP
GREAT NORTHERN PAPER INC
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
LINCOLN PULP 8. PAPER CO. INC
MADISON PAPER INDUSTRIES
JAMES RIVER CORP
MEAD OXFORD CORPORATION, RUMFO
S D WARREN CO
SD. WARREN CO
KIMBERLY CLARK TISSUE COMPANY
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
AMERICAN FIBRIT INC.
MEAD CORP;
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
PACKAGING CORP. OF AMERICA
MANISTiQUE PAPERS INC.
S.D. WARREN CO.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
MENASHA CORP
POTLATCH CORP.
LAKE SUPERIOR PAPER INDUSTRIES
BLANDIN PAPER CO.
BOISE CASCADE CORP.
HENNEPIN PAPER CO.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP
CERTAINTEED CORP.
WEYERHAEUSER CO
NEWSPRINT SOUTH INC.
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
NTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
NTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.

nspectlons (2 years)
Air

Total

Average
See Note 1
" 31

5
3
3
1
0
1
2
4
1
3
t
2
2
2
2
3
1
3
2
2
0
1
0
0
15
1
1
0
0
10
0
9
1
1
3
0
S
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
2
2
NP
ft
0
0
0
0
NP
2
2
2
1
Water

Total

Average
See Note 1
2.7

2
5
2
NP
S
5
1
6
9
4
2
3
2
1
2
1
2
3
2
2
NP
1
0
0
5
1
4
3
2
3
0
2
3
3
S
3
4
NP
1
0
2
2
1
2
2
1
0
NP
0
1
0
0
NP
3
4
1
1
3
RCRA

Tot*

Average
Sea Note 1
0.5

5
0
0
0
0
NP
0
1
0
0
ft
1
0
0
0
NP
6
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
6
0
ft
1
i
0
0
0
ft
0
0
2
ft
1
ft
0
ft
1
0
0
0
0
NP
0
NP
0
0
0


Total

Average
See Note 1
5.4

12
8
5
1
5
6
3
11
10
7
3
6
4
3
4
t
3
9
4
4
0
2
ft
0
20
2
5
3
2
13
0
11
4
5
9
3
9
1
2
2
5
5
2
4
3
3
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
3
6
3
3
4
Historical Noncomplance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompliance
event)


Air

Average
See Note 1
1.0

0
3
g
1
2
0
S
5
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
1
1
0
8
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
0
3
4
1
4
0
4
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
D
0


Water

Average
See Note 1
1.6

0
1
4
0
ft
0
ft
0
ft
1
0
0
0
1
2
3
1
0
ft
0
ft
0
0
3
3
0
ft
1
T
3
ft
3
a
a
2
3

0
7
1
6
a
1
a
6
6
0
8
8
8
4
0
0
ft
1
ft
0


RCRA

Average
See Note 1
0.6

a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
ft
0
0
0
8
0
1
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
o
&
6
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


A. W R

Average
See Note 1
2.6

a
3
g
1
2
0
5
5
0
1
D
0
0
1
2
3
1
8
0
0
0
0
0
3
5
0
0
1
8
3
8
a
a
a
2
3
2
0
B
1
a
8
2
8
6
6
8
2
a
8
a
4
0
0
0
1
0
	 0

Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
• of
pomtants
overkmt

Average
See Note 1
2.0

D
2
4
NP
1
0
0
2
ft
1
1
3
0
1
2
0
0
1
2
0
NP
0
3
1
2
0
2
0
0
2
5
0
1
1

2

NP
3
1
1
3
•f
0
2
0
0
NP
3
2
5
1
NP
1
0
2
d
2

f of poKutarts
regulated

Average
See Note 1
125

4
6
3ft
NP
4
5
i
8
12
6
71
14
6
17
16
0
14
14
7
16
NP
0
11
8
6
4
ft
9
13
7
ft
12
14
16

20
16
NP
14
5
20
11
S
14

10
7
NP
S
17
7
10
NP
10
8
10
4
6

* or reports
over krnt

Average
See Note 1
6.0

6
3
27
NP
5
0
0
5
6
1
1
6
ft
1
2
0
6
1
4
0
NP
0
S
1
r
0
4
0
0
4
31
0

1
1
8
21
NP
4
1
1
6
1
0
:5
0
0
NP
40
5
53
1
NP
1
0
2
0
7

t of reports
submitted

Average
See Note 1
3824

92
122
516
NP
92
115
11S
878
545
230
276
384
184
571
779
0
200
810
368
324
NP
0
195
136
486
92

234
198
207
1.168
464
536
496
433
530
342
NP
345
115
dif
619
119
313
411
353
414
NP
276
362
299
269
NP
180
284
191
14
98

Significant Noncompliance Indicator


Air
Percent of
Facikbes
SeeNotel
19.4%

N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
V
Y
N
Y

N

N
Y
Y
N
|vj
N

-.
N

Y
Y
NP
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N


Water
Percent of
Facik.es
See Note 1
7.7%

N
N
Y
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
Y
|SJ

N
N

Y
Y
N
NP
N
Y
N
Y
NP
N
N
N
N
N


RCRA
Percert of
Facikbes
SeeNotel
0.0%

N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Nt
N
N
N

N
N
N
H

N
..
j.
N
N
N
hi
N
N
N
NP
N
NP
N
N
N


A'W'R

Average
See Note3
0.3

0
0
2
1
ft
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0

0
ft
0
ft
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
ft
0
fl
o
1
1
1
0
1
Q
0
Q

2
1
0
0
1
0
1
ft
0
B
0
0

Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years


Air

Average
SeeNotel
0.3

ft
0
0
0
0
0
,0
0
1
0
2
0
ft
0
1
0
0
0
ft
0
ft
0
ft
0
ft
0
0
0
0
o
ft
o
ft
0
Q
0
2
0
ft
0
0

Q
0

Q
0
NP
ft
0
ft
0
ft
NP
ft
0
6


Water

Average
SeeNotel
0.2

ft
0
ft
NP
0
0
ft
0
6
2
ft
0
ft
0
ft
2
0
0
ft
0
NP
0
ft
ft
ft
0
0
o

o
ft
0
0
0

Q
0
NP
0

0
Q
0
g
n
Q
0
NP
ft
0
0
0
NP
0
0
0
0


RCRA

Average
SeeNotel
0.0

d
0
D
0
0
NP
0
0
B
0
D
0
0
0
0
NP
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
o
o

fj
o
fj

o
0
0

g



f

0
0
d
0
o
0
NP
0
NP
0
g


Total

Average
See Note 1
0.5

D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
0
ft
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
d
0
a
0
0
o
0
0
fl
o
rj
Q
2
0
0
n
fl

rj
Q
fl
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
Note 1 Average is calculated across all entries with value of 0 or greater
Note 2 Average 01 number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act. Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3 Average number of programs In which facilities are considered to be in significant noncompNance. (maximum vakje=3)
Note 4 This indicator Is NOT comparable across industry sectors. The unit:
Note 5 TNs indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors Average
Note 6 Average of those with at least one spiR reported.
Note 7 Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP = no perrnMD* identified; NC = value not calculated; Inact = inactive permit/ID*
n significant noncompliance. (maximum value=3)
ipply only to a sector: Automobile Assembly: vehldesrymr; Pulp Mills: short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mills: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric lonsfVear
i calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
                                                                                                                 47

-------
                                                                                       Pulp Manufacturers Data Summary
                                                                                                        Table C

Data puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System





Sector Statistics
3 ow»
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
61
92
83
84
B5
86
87
18
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
too
101
102
103
104
105
106
10?
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
MAME
UNION CAMP CORP.
OILMAN PAPER CO
POTIATCH CORP;
CHICAGO TISSUE CO L.P.
THE CELOTEX CORP
KIEFFER PAPER MILLS. INC.
THE WESTON PAPER » MFC CO.
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC.
WESTVACOCORP
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
GAYLORD CONTAINER CORP.
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC.
BOISE CASCADE CORP.
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
THE CELOTEX CORP
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO:
JAMES RIVER CORP.
RIVERWOOD INTERNATIONAL CORP.
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.
8AY STATE PAPER CO.
ERVING INDUSTRIES INC.
SCHWEITZER-MAUDUiT INTERNATION
ESLEECK MANUFACTURING CO. INC.
WESTVACOCOnrP:
STATLER TISSUE CO.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
GREAT NORTHERN PAPER INC
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
LINCOLN PULP a PAPER CO . INC
MADISON PAPER INDUSTRIES
JAMES RIVER CORP.
MEAD OXFORD CORPORATION, RUMFO
S D WARREN CO
S.D. WARREN CO.
KIMB6RLY CLARK TISSUE COMPANY
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP,
AMERICAN FIBRIT INC.
MEAD CORP
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.
PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA
MANISTIOUE PAPERS INC.
5.0. WARREN CO
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
MENASHA CORP.
POTLATCH CORP.
LAKE SUPERIOR PAPER INDUSTRIES
BLANOIN PAPER CO.
BOISE CASCADE CORP.
HENNEPIN PAPER CO.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
C6RTAINTE6DCORP.
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
NEWSPRINT SOUTH INC.
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.

Production

Short Tons/Day

Average
See Notes 144
1.016

3,406
1.200

170
250
190
530
1,475
1.000
1.332
3.ZOO
2.190
2,589
1,900
2,600
200
1.100
1.148
2.325
2.120
450
115
15
26
1,2*9
200
1.Z75
800
1,625
450
630
450
1.50S
1.804
TOO

1.106

1,630
400
912
300
TOD
1,500
730
830
540
670
1.450
1.461
100
830
200
1.550
690
2.776
aio
1,300

TRI Releases

1996 -ToW Pounds

Average
See Note 1
1,009.463

S.913,704
1.237,120
1,384,690
NP
128,620
3
18T.500
1.242.949
1.375, <39
1,499.294
1.715,512
1.092,775
1,924.794
1,736.407
3,489,794
6.354
2:531,260
765.899
2.709,672
1.821.50t
had
0
0
Inacl
1,665,800
17.550
:612i270
244.161
617,003
316.913
liwct
539,141
945,129
852.588
1J2S,H7
55.000
806,498
load
755,047
190.472
398,812
0
303,851
418.960
1.006,590
160.710
352,334
11.000
0
707.705
(met
96.725
NP
Inacl
92.309
3,192.894
677,102
2.118.240

TRI Transfers

1996 - Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
201,719

537,256
1.265
5
NP
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,586
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Mad
0
0
Inact
5.698,360
0
0
210,000
0
1,475
Inert
0
603,056
0
55,695
0
0
Inact
0
0
11,813
0
4,077.982
0
0
0
4,429,676
47.250
28,072
0
IflftCf
0
NP
Inact
0
0
0
0
TRI Releases * 	
Transfers per
Production Unit

pounds/ production umts

Average
SM Notes 14 5
1178.0

1,6111)
1,032.0
NC
NC
5141
00
3046
842.7
1,3:75.1
1,125.6
537,B
4990
7435
9139
1,534.5
316
2,301.2
6672
1.165,5
859.2
NC
NC
0.0
NC
3.670.1
878
480,2
567.7
3797
707.5
NC
1.198.1
1.161.6
4726
1.703.5
NC
7279
NC
4632
476.2
450.3
0.0
6.259.B
279.3
1,378.9
193.6
8,855.6
86.9
19.4
484.4
NC
1165
NC
NC
142.0
1,150.2
835.9
1,629.4

TRI Releases -
Carcinogens

1996 -Tots* Pounds

Average
See Note 1
94.718

190,830
60.500
168.200
NP
0
0
26,000
165.292
111,905
85,867
131.009
28.884
316.843
109.400
119,442
0
120.236
86.535
257.387
193.804
Inset
0
0
Inact
94,000
0
0
0
2J,«16
9.600
tract
66.199
109,700
59,476
:B1;070
0
204,740
Inact
175,548
0
84,781
0
28,914
0
77,658
33.382
9;718
0
0
72.358
Intel
0
NP
Inact
0
212,991
30,699
356,122
TRI Releases *
Transfers -
Melals

1996 - Total Pounds

Average
See Note t
39.143

386.000
0
260,750
NP
9
0
0
0
36,378
29.900
0
0
0
0
ft
0
&
0
7,421
0
Inact
0
0
Inacl
57.73f>
0
174,364
211,750
o
5,765
Inact
0
600.062
1,820
35,808
0
0
Inact
0
0
0
0
0
21.700
0
0
a
0
0
0
Inact
0
NP
Inact
1,522
104,736
0
0

TRI Production -
Related Waste

1996 - Total Pounds

AV..O.
See Note 1
7.129,139

«,782,072
11.228.024
TO.775,016
NP
12*,S20
15,231
241,500
6,525,152
8,289,612
12,641,920
7.123,332
4.406,060
«,*49,880
5,064.104
10,671 ,953
17.688
4.774,400
2.360.414
43.922,656.
18.652.336
Inact
33,220
0
Inact
15,893,960
17.550
812,270
472.440
11,303,496
3.221,284
Inset
7.935.400
15,962,800
11.124,376
•0.9*2,5/12
75.000
11,471,416
Inact
9,615.048
190.522
2,411,492
0
6.898.984
9,318,600
1.789,843
213.433
5,452.920
58.000
28,072
11.094.608
(met
1.424.734
NP
Inact
128.241
9.200,192
6,259,364
12,004,376

Pollutant Soils

Spil Occurrence
percent of
Facimes

37J%

Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
¥
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
¥
Y
Y
N
N
N
1
N
¥
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
¥
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
last 2 years)

HolSpK

A»nw.
See Note H
3.6

9
4
21





1
1






1

2
1






1
5
6
2
2

6
2
3



1

1




2
2
1
4
2



4






Amount Spiled |t>s)

A^
See Note 7
11.879

S1ft
30
65.328





106










7,789






3.ZOO
3.738
904
20
7,040

13.604
20
(8.895



3,552






8
234

8.340
1,043



96,042





Surrounding
Population
Residents "tthin 3
mitos

Average
See Note 1
2T957

25,805
4,554
f2.85!
113.489
32,7®
3,821
41,701
7,750
1.8S1
17.510
14.988
1.153
1,473
6,371

108.880
2.165
1.725
30.748

166,147
1,244
5,875
18.518
4,378:
18.841
2.) 15
2.166
4.198
521
3,007
14.861
5.502
1,648
35.394
22.092
1,274
11.869
4,305
65.384
7.647
4,120
33,014
4.958
1,965
12.227
5,588
27,165
7,621
7.288
7.954
16.151
16,151

12,39S

16,874
19.851
Note 1: Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2: Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncompHance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act. Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs In which facilities are considered to be in significant noncomplance. (maximum value=3)
Note 4  This indcalor Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector- Automobile Assembly, vehicles^ear; Pulp Mils, short tons/day. Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short tons/year: Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5  This indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. Average Is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 6  Average of those with al least one spil reported.
Note 7  Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID* ioentified, NC = value not calculated, Inact = Inactive permit/ID*

-------
                                      Pulp Manufacturers Location Data
                                                    Table A
Data pufcd on July 13,1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
nr
118
419
120
\H
122
:ra
124
125
126
\V
128
129
130
Mt
132
133
134
133
136
«?
138
f39
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
tit
152
M3
154
M5
156
: 157
158
159
160
«1
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
t7.1
172
173
174
NAME
MISSISSIPPI RIVER COftP
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP
LAUREL HILL PAPER CO
THE GEtQTEX CORP:
ALPHA CELLULOSE CORP
WEYERHAEUSER CO
REXHAM INC
P;H:OtA:TreLfSRCO.
WEYERHAUSER
FEDERAL PAPER BOARD CO., INC.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP
CROWN PAPER CO.
MARCAL PAPER MILLS
GARDEN STATE PAPER co
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
F:iNe»,:p:KuYHi,;eo;,iNe:
LYDALL MANNING
STEVENS * THOMPSON PAPER CO,
LYONS FALLS PULP I PAPER INC
PACKAGING CORP. OF AMERICA
ENCORE PAPER CO.
iNteftNAflONAL PAPER CO.
MEAD CORP.
OHWMLP MILLS INC.
JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION
STONE CD*fTAIN6H CORP.
ATLAS ROOFING CORP.
CHENEY PULP * PAPER CO.
BAY WEST PAPER CORP.
CERTAtNTEEDCORP
APPLETON PAPERS INC.
FRASIER PAPERS INC , W CARROLL
FORT HOWARD CORPORATION
ORCHIDS PAPER PRODUCTS CO
WEYERHAEUSER
WttLAMETTEBIOySTRIES INC.
JAMES RIVER CORP
iNTeRNAflONAL PAPER CO.
JAMES RIVER CORP
SMURFIT HEWSPftlNT CORP
WEYERHAEUSER CO
SMURFIT NEWSPRINT CORP.
WEYERHAEUSER CO
QEORQIA-PACIWCCOHP
SIMPSON PAPER CO.
iNTERNATlONAL PAPER CO,
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
PROCTER « GAMBLE PAPER PRODUCT
APPLETON PAPERS INC.
P.H. GLATFELTER CO
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC
BOWATER INC.
STREET ADDRESS
30 MAJORCA RD
BUCK CREEK RD.
PO BOX 950
MULLAN RD.
P.O. BOX 4000
LEDBETTER RD.
430 OLD MT OLIVE RD.
1000 E. NOIR ST.
PO BOX 1391

1ECUSTARO.
PO BOX 787
JOJflilL.UIEfJELRD:
N. ROANOKEAVE.
850 MAIN ST.
1 MARKET ST.
950 RIVER OS.
85 MAIN ST.
PtNEST,
ANDERSON AVE.
iGLENST
68 GEORGE ST.
MILL RO
CENTER ST
98W66DST EXT
1 RIVER ST.
1000 SHORE AIRPORT RO
401 S PAINT ST.
2100 LOSANTMLLE RD.
401 W. MILL ST.
500N+THST
1 25 N. RIVER ST.
ANDERSON ST
700 COLUMBIA AVE.
PO BOX 800
1 030 W ALEX-BELL ROAD
S1 SOUTH ELM STREET
5600 CHANDLER RD
6THSHUNT6TS.
PO BOX 890
PO BOX 339
RT 2 BOX 21 85
PO BOX 854
30470 AMERICAN DR
PO8OXJ6
JORDAN POINT RD
419 MAIN ST.
PO BOX 275
PO BOX 580
400 MILL ST.
1540 E. LAKE RD.
100 CENTER ST
S. HIGHLAND ST
RTE87
100 PAPER Mill. RQ
228 S MAIN ST
PO BOX 678
5300 CURETON FERRY RD
CITY
NATCHEZ
NEW AUGUSTA
VtCKSBURG
MISSOULA
CANTON
CORDOVA
GOLDSBORO
LUMBERTON
NEW BERN
PINEVILLE
PISGAH FOREST
PLYMOUTH
R1EOELWOOO
ROANOKE RAPIDS
BERLIN
ELMWOOD PARK
eARFIELD
SPOTSWOOD
COWMTH
DEFERIET
Ol. ENS FALLS
GREEN ISLAND
GREENWICH
LYONS FALLS
PLATTSBUROH
SOUTH GLENS FALL
TICONDEROGA
CHILLICOTHE
CINCINNATI:
CIRCLEVILLE
COSHOCTON
FRANKLIN
FRANKLIN
MIDDLETOWN
MILAN
WEST CARROLLTON
WE3TCARROLLTON
MUSKOGEE
PRYOR
VALLIANT
ALBANY-
CLATSKANIE
GARDINER
HALSEY
NEWBEftQ
NORTH BEND
OREGON CITY
SPRINGFIELD
TOLEDO
WEST LINN
ERIE
JOHNSON BURG
LOCK HAVEN
MEHOOPANY
ROARING SPRING
SPRING GROVE
BENNETTSVlLtE
CATAWBA
ST
MS
MS
MS
MT
HC
NC
NC
NC
NG
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NH
NJ
NJ
NJ
NV
NY
NV
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OK
OK
OK
OR
OR
OR
OR
Of)
OR
OH
OR
OR
OR
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
SC
sr.
EPA
RGN
rj*
04
04
08
04
04
04
04
0*
04
04
04
04
04
01
02

-------
                                                                                                  Pulp Manufacturers Data Summary
                                                                                                                   Table B

Data pulled on Jury 13, 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System






Sector Statistics
Row*
:ii?
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
1«5
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
15?
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
JAME
Mississippi RivERittdRpT '
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.
NTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
STONE CONTAINER CORP
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
LAUREL HILL PAPER CO
THE CELOTEX CORP.
ALPHA CELLULOSE CORP.
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
REXHAM INC.
P.H. GIATFELTB? CO:
WEYERHAUSER
FEDERAL PAPER BOARD CO.. INC.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
CROWN PAPER CO.
MARCAL PAPER MILLS
GARDEN STATE PAPER CO
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CCL
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP
FINCH. PRUYN A CO .; 1NC.
LYOALL MANNING
STEVENS it THOMPSON PAPER CO.,
LYONS FALLS PULP & PAPER INC.
PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA
ENCORE PAPER CO.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
MEAD CORP
OHtO PULP MILLS INC
JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION
STONE CONTAINER CORP,
ATLAS ROOFING CORP.
CHENEY PULP 1 PAPER CO
BAY WEST PAPER CORP.
CERTAINTEED CORP.
APPLETON PAPERS INC.
FRASISR PAPERS INC,, W CARRQU
FORT HOWARD CORPORATION
ORCHIDS PAPER PRODUCTS CO
WEYERHAEUSER
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC.
JAMES RIVER CORP
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
JAMES RIVER CORP
SMURFIT NEWSPRINT CORP
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
SMURFIT NEWSPRINT CORP.
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
GEORGiA-PACIFiC CORP
SIMPSON PAPER CO.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
PROCTER J, GAMBLE PAPER PRODUCT
APPLETON PAPERS INC.
P.H. GLATFELTER CO.
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC!:
BOWATER INC.

Inspections (2 years)
Air

Total



- 3.1

NP
NP
1
3
0
1
1
3
5
2
2
14
4
0
3
1
2
1
1
1
7
1
0
2
2
1
5
8
NP
2
8
1
NP
NP
2
5
2
3
NP
4
4
1
7
1
2
2
1
0
4
1
4
7
0
3
6
8
2
2
Water

Total

Avaraga
SMNOtt 1
27

2
0
6
3
S
4
1
4
1
0
3
1
3
2
2
1
2
0
4
5
4
NP
5
9
NP
4
5
4
NP
6
0
NP
0
2
NP
2
2
2
NP
2
2
2
3
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
1
5
18
3
4
10
3
4
RCRA

TOW

Avaraga
Saa Nota 1
'• 0.5

NP
0
0
1
1
NP
NP
0
0
2
1
1
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
NP
1
0
0
NP
1
0
0
NP
1
0
1
0
0
NP
0
0
1
1
0
»
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
NP
2
1
0


Total

Avaraga
Saa Nota 1
54

2
0
7
7
6
5
3
7
6
4
B
16
?
3
S
4
4
1
6
7
11
1
9
11
2
6
10
12
NP
9
8
1
8
3
2
8
4
5
NP
E
6
4
11
4
4
5
3
2
6
3
5
12
18
3
10
20
6
6
Historical Noncomplance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompliBnce
event)


Air

Avaraga
SaaNola 1
1.0

D
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
4
0
0
0
6
0
0
6
a
0
3
1
NP
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
NP
0
0
8
G
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
1
3
0
0
0
2
a
3


water

Avaraga
Saa Nota 1
1 	 f6

3
0
0
1
0
5
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
8
8
0
3
8
8
0
5
4
0
B
8
0
NP
2
2
0
6
7
0
0
9
1
NP
1
ft
2
2
3
0
4
0
2
2
0
0
4
2
0
2
0
t
3


RCRA

Avaraga
Saa Not* 1
0.6

a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
&
0
0
0
NP
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
NP
0
0
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
&
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


A. W R

Avaraga
Saa Nota:
Ts

3
0
0
8
0
5
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
5
8
8
0
3
8
8
0
5
6
0
8
8
1
NP
2
3
0
0
7
2
3
0
1
NP
t
0
8
4
3
0
4
:0
2
r
0
i
5
2
0
2
2
6
5

Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Ad (2
year data)
• of
poMarts
ovar hmt

Avaraga
SaaNote 1
2.0

3
1
t
2
1
2
0
3
t
0
0
1
t
0
3
1
0
0
3
1
7
NP
4
5
NP
0
2
2
NP
2
3
NP
0
2
NP
1
»
2
NP
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
1
2
0
D
2
1
1
2
4
2
7

f olpoftjtants
raguutad

«•"*•
Saa Nota 1
575

6
17
10
16
18
15
0
14
17
0
13
14
1+
20
20
5
7
0
18
15
18
NP
13
9
NP
24
22
20
NP
20
2.1
NP
6
26
NP
15
1$
9
NP
10
«
16
»
12
1S
28
7
12
26
6
0
11
13
7
29
11
IS
18

• of raports
over fcnut

Avaraoa
Saa Nota 1
6.0

9
1
1
2
1
23
0
11
i
0
0
1
6
0
1J
1
0
0
16
1
11
NP
7
26
MP
0
4
2
NP
7
6
NP
ft
4
NP
1
2
2
NP
0
0
2
0
2
1
0
0
1
i
0
0
4
1
11
J
6
6
15

• of raports
sutxnttad

tarw
Saa Nota 1
3824

123
191
295
1,164
37S
345
0
315
390
0
293
453
3*8
399
1.041
48
322
0
418
356
411
NP
357
246
NP
324
550
844
NP
596
745
NP
0
491
NP
409
449
304
NP
202
494
872
271
215
378
307
397
925
405
223
0
288
271
204
415
372
430
566

Significant Noncompliance Indicator


Air
Parcart of
FaciWas

I 19.4%

NP
NP
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
hi
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
NP
N
Y
N
NP
NP
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N


Wotar
Parcart of
FaciMas
Saa Nota 1
7.7%

N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
NP
N
N
N
NP
Y
N
NP
N
N
NP
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N


RCRA
Parcant of
Facittaas

' ao5T

NP
N
N
N
N
NP
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
W
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N


A+W*R

Avarw.
Saa Nota 3
0.3

0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
«
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
<)
0
0
0
«
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0

Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years


Air

Awaga

63

NP
NP
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
Z
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
NP
0
0
0
NP:
NP
0
1
0
0
NP
1
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
3
ft
0


Watar

Avaraga

0.2

1
0
0
0
&
0
9
0
ft
0
ft
0
9
0
0
0
ft
0
ft
0
1
NP
0
1
NP
0
0
0
NP
0
0
NP
0
0
NP
0
0
0
NP
0
ft
0
0
1
0
0
a
o
o
0
i>
o
0
0
0
o
ft
1


RCRA

Avaraga
Saa Nota 1
0.0

NP
0
0
0
0
NP
NP
0
a
a
D
0
0
0
2
1
a
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
NP
0
a
0
NP
0
a
0
NP
0
a
0
0
a
NP
0
0
0
g
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
a
o
0
o
NP
0
0
0


Total

Avaraga
Saa Nota 1
0.5

T
0
a
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
2
6
2
0
a
0
3
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
NP
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
NP
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
D
0
^
o
0
0
i
3
0
1
Note 1: Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2. Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomptlance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3  Average number of programs in which faciities are considered to be in significant noncompriance. (maximum value=3)
Note 4  This indicator is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector: Automobile Assembly: vehiclesAwar; Pulp Mils: short tons/day: Petroleum Refining: babels/day; Iron and Steel Mills: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5  This indicator l! NOT comparable across industry sectors. Average is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 6. Average of those with it least one spil reported.
Note 7  Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID* identified: NC = value not calculated: Inact«inactive permit/ID»
                                                                                                                 50

-------
                                                                                    Pulp Manufacturers Data Summary
                                                                                                    Table C

Data puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System





Sector Statistics
Row*
11?
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
15?
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
155
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
NAME
MISSISSIPPI RIVER CORP.
GEORGIA'PACIFIC CORP
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP:
LAUREL HILL PAPER CO
THE CELOTEX CORP.
ALPHA CELLULOSE CORP
WEYEftHAEUSER CO:
REXHAM INC
P.M. GtATFELTER CO.
WEYERHAUSER
FEDERAL PAPER BOARD CO .INC.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
CROWN PAPER CO.
MARCAL PAPER MILLS
GARDEN STATE PAPER CO:
KIMBERLY'CLARK CORP
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
FINCH, PRUYN * CO., INC.
LYOALL MANNING
STEVENS tV THOMPSON PAPER CO.,
LYONS FALLS PULP 4 PAPER INC
PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA
ENCORE PAPER CO.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
MEAD CORP.
OHIO PULP MILLS INC
JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION
STONE CONTAINER CORP,
ATLAS ROOFING CORP
CHENEY PULP *. PAPER CO
BAY WEST PAPER CORP
CERTAINTEEDCORP;
APPLETON PAPERS INC.
FRASKR PAPERS INC .WCARROU
FORT HOWARD CORPORATION
ORCHIDS PAPER PRODUCTS CO.
WEYERHAEUSER
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC.
JAMES RIVER CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
JAMES RIVER CORP
SMURFIT NEWSPRINT CORP:
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
SMURFIT NEWSPRINT CORP.
WEYERHAEUSER CO
GEORGIA'PACIFie CORP.
SIMPSON PAPER CO.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO-
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
PROCTER & GAMBLE PAPER PRODUCT
APPLETON PAPERS INC,
P H GLATFELTER CO
WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC
BOWATER INC.

Production

Short Tons/Day

Average
See Notes 14 4
1,016

350
1.550
1.600
1,910
1,613
50
520
165
MO

300
2.460
2,400
1.440
71S
250
BOO
132
550
646
620
20
55
220

200
850
1,300
SO
325
845
130
30
260
90
350
300
849
75
3.200
1.350
1,200
950
265
1,080
600
650
1,900
I.SMl
525
1.019
1.000
650
210
815
TOO
225

TRI Releases

1996 - Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
1,009,463

NP
1.067.431
1.51S.795
1.965.900
2,999,426
NP
500
4,581
1.224,315
8.600
431.167
2.431.560
J.J22,WO
620.694
580.479
Inact
a
15.573
a
63.515
2,489,444
a
Inact
5
NP
255
J95.555
1.316,290
NP
604.975
1,577,485
Inact
250
Inact
NP
423,300
12,830
754.498
NP
3.198.148
S6S,«07
445.318
1.084,221
705.676
79,458
23.005
8S.164
2.592.060
1.206.120
Inact
2.426,248
712,384
748,988
710.670
225.507
1,611.944
609,639
1.635,586

TRI Transfers

1996 -Total Pounds

Average
See Motel
201,719

NP
31,057
0
511
2,867
NP
3,820
0
0
2.000
200.627
0
0
0
4.638
Inact
0
237,485
0
0
1905
10.988
Inact
0
NP
0
0
164.003
NP
505
0
Inact
250
Inact
NP
90,700
0
3.100
NP
0
0
0
0
2.260
207,546
0
124,309
7.698
0
Inact
3.737.52*;
0
0
0
609
14,326
0
0
TRI Releases 	 	
Transfers per
Production Unit

pounds/ production units

Average
See Notes 14 5
1178.0

NC
708.7
949,3
1.029.5
1,861.3
NC
8.3
27.8
1.530.4
NC
2.106.0
988.4
1,384.3
569.9
790.4
NC
0.0
1.917.1
0,0
98.3
3,9893
549.4
NC
0.0
NC
1.3
347,7
1,138.7
NC
1.863.0
1,8*6.9
NC
16.7
NC
NC
1.468.6
426
8923
NC
9994
432.5
371.1
1.120.2
2.671.5
2657
38.3
3192
1,3683
8122
NC
6.048,8
7124
1.1S23
NC
1,076.7
1.995.4
870.9
72693

TRI Releases -
Carcinogens

1996 - Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
94,718

HP
0
84.240
173.820
190,860
NP
0
0
147,975
0
0
138.513
639,200
66.546
15,520
Inact
0
13.578
0
0
0
0
tract
0
NP
0
22.600
98.070
NP
146.880
510; 1»
Inact
0
Inact
NP
37.000
fl
41,250
NP
141.529
31,654
7,190
31.242
280,200
0
0
0
427,500
78,690
Inact
130.194
16.612
0
0
82,100
51.104
235,161
229.835
TRI Releases <•
Transfers -
Metals

1996 -Total Pounds

Average
SeeNotel
39.143

NP
0
0
0
0
NP
4,320
0
6
0
198.391
3.518
0
0
:0
Inact
0
0
0
0
0
3.665
Inact
0
NP
0
9,900
30.030
NP
0
0
Inact
0
Inact
NP
18.000
0
33,350
NP
0
0
0
0
0
2*1.661
0
0
0
ft
Inact
3367;
0
0
0
4s!s57
7.848
	 432,630

TRI Production -
Related Waste

1996 - Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
7.129,139

NP
17.345,072
20.555,472
8.584.832
18,648,568
NP
280
4,581
22,344,112
39,600
2.333.64B
22.364.368
2J.041.328
7,188,200
6,835.024
Inact
0
243,826
0
599.606
5,427,200
11.467
ln»ct
0
NP
300
6.665,008
8,321.508
NP
787,034
1,834.t92
Inact
23,800
Inact
NP
1.629,000
348,04?
941,460
NP
10.681.656
3.216,442
30.234,752
1:869,050
5,768.248
41,000
206,977
8,114.512
2,522.400
Inact
10.2SZ512
4,600,780
1.722,959
2,891.192
1,580.400
6.347,704
6,371,376

Pollutant SpMs (last 2 years)

Soil Occurrence
Percent ot
Facihbes

37.7%

N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
¥
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y

Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
M.

N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y

* ot Spils

Average
SeeNotee
36




3
7






1
4



1

2
1



1


3
1





1

4

1
2



5

3
2
1

Amount Spiled {tjs)

Average
See Note 7
1 1 .879




24
20,625






4,000
6r



10.560

15.340
375






37Z






1

490

70.564
42



1,357

1,066
385

Surrounding
Population
Residents wthn 3
mtos

Average
SeeNotel
24,957

^0,364
703
411
1.398
•tO.781
3,360
8,792
18.234
t,012
33.096
4.OT7
2.371
628
16.100
9,659
286.532
288,927
65.968
2.760
3,329
36^17
94.597
3,444
1,922
1,922
35.821

23,352
23,352
13.669
tt.SSS
24,324
23,330
45.986
3.481
53,015
40,622

l!si5
7,574
734
1.777
680
7 130

35614
3.491
41 550
59323
4,730
15,160
2.539
4,942
8,728
1,089
Note 1  Average is calculated across «l entries witri value o» 0 of greater.
Note 2  Average of number of Quarters with a violation or noncomplance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs in which facilities are considered to be in significant noncomplance, (maximum value=3)
Not. 5- ™! 'r^'!"' I* WOT TT"^ '"""inlU*" S"*°™ I"* "*" "*"" °^'" * "*'*  MmM>* Assembly: veNdes/year; Pulp Mills short tons/day: Petroleum Refining: battels/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short tons/year Nonferrous Metals metric tons/year
Note 6  Avera™ol'"os
-------
                                      Pulp Manufacturers Location Data
                                                    Table A
Dtli puled on July 13.1998 from Integrated Data foe Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
17S
176
177
178
17S
180
181
182
1W
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
M7
208
209
210
21<
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
229
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
NAME
wesTyAco:CORP,:::;:;::;:::::::;:::::::::::::
UNION CAMP CORP
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
SONOCO PRODUCTS CO.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
BOWATER INC.;
SOUTHERN CELLULOSE PRODUCTS IN
PACKAGING CORP, OP AMERICA
MEAD CORP.
TAMKO ROOFING PRODUCTS, INC:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORP:
PONDEROSAOF TENNESSEE
INLAND CONTAINER CORP.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP
CHAMPION WTERNATWNAt CORP
INLAND PAPERBOARD AND PACKAGIN
SIMPSON PASADENA PAPER CO,
INLAND EASTEX
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO.
VIRGINIA FIBRE CORP.
BEAR ISLAND PAPER CO, UP.
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
WESTVACOCORP.
UNION CAMP CORP
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
ST. LAURENT PAPER PRODUCTS COR
PUTNEY PAPER CO IMC.
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.
JAMES RIVER CORP,
WEYERHAEUSER CO
SCOTT PAPER CO.
LONGVIEW FIBRE CO
NORTH PACIFIC PAPER CORP,
WEYERHAEUSER CO
DAISHOWA AMERICA CO. LTD.
RAYONIER
PORT TOWNSEND PAPER CORP,
INLAND EMPIRE PAPER CO.
RAINY RIVER FOREST PRODUCTS IN
SIMPSON TACOMA KRAFT CO.
PONDERAY NEWSPRINT CO.
BOISE CASCADE CORP.
BOISE CASCADE CORP.
KERWIN PAPER CO.
REBBRE
JAMES RIVER CORP.
WAUSAU PAPER MILLS
APPLETON PAPERS INC.
GLOBE BUILDING: MATERIALS INC,
ECOFIBRE INC.
FOX RIVER fIBER CO
POPE S TALBOT INC
FORD HOWARD CORP:
PROCTER AND GAMBLE
THIMANY PULP AND PAPER
REPAP WISCONSIN INC.
STREET ADDRESS
5600 VR61NIA AVE,; ::; : ; :: ! i ••:; ;: : : : : i : : :
POBOXB
PAPER MILL RD.
700 S. KAMINSKI ST.
NORTH SECOND ST.
POBOX8
50ZOHWY11S
W 45TH ST. & CENTRAL AVE
POBOSSJ
PO BOX 1964
2906 JOHNSTON ST. NW
5600 KIMBERLY WAY
iaoi TCLMAN STREET:
PO BOX 70384
PO BOX 299
SHELDON MILL
LUPKINMLL
PO BOX 2500
PO BOX 872
PO BOX 816
PO BOX B70
PO BOX 339
PO BOX 2119
PO BOX 40
10* E RIVERSIDE ST.
34040 UNION CAMP DR.
910 INDUSTRIAL ST.
19TH & MAIN STS.
OLD DEPOT SO.
300 W. LAUREL ST.
4TH4 ADAMS STS
1701 1ST STREET
2600 FEDERAL WAY
PO BOX 639
PO BOX 2069
PO BOX 188
1942 MARINE DRIVE
700 N ENNIS ST.
PO BOX 3170
N3320ARGONNERD
4302 CHAMBERS CREEK RD
801 PORTLAND AVE.
422767 HWY 20
907W.7THST.
PO BOX 500
801 S. LAWE ST.
3001 E GLENDALE AVE
2301 LAKE SHORE DR. E.
PO BOX 305

SO BRIDGE ST.
500 FORTUNE AVE.
1751 W.MATTHEW OR.
1200 FOREST ST.
1919 S BROADWAY
501 EASTMAN AVE
THUMANYROAD
433 NORTH MAIN STREET
CITY
CHARLESTON;:;: 	 	 ".•.: -•
EASTOVER
FLORENCE
GEORGETOWN
HAHTSVtLE
SELLERS
CALHQUN
CHATTANOOGA
COUNCe
KINGSPORT
KNOXVILLE
LOUDON
MEMPHIS
MEMPHIS
NEWJOHNSONVIILE
HOUSTON
CUFX1N
ORANGE
PASADENA
SILSBEE
TEXARKANA
AMHERST
ASHLAND
BIG ISLAND
COVINQTON
FRANKLIN
HOPEWELL
WEST POINT
PUTNEY
BELLINGHAM
CAMAS
COSMOPOLIS
EVERETT
LONGVIEW
LONGVIEW
LONGVIEW
PORT ANGELES
PORT ANGELES
PORT TOWNSEND
SPOKANE
STEItCOOM
TACOMA
USK
VANCOUVER
WAUULA
APPLETON
APPLETON
ASHLAND
8ROKAW
COMBINED LOCKS
CORNELL
DE PERE
DEPERE
EAU CLAIRE
GREEN BAY
GREEN BAY
KAUKAUNA
KIMBERLY
ST
su:
sc
sc
sc
sc
sc
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VT
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
Wl
Ml
Wl
Wl
Wl
wt
Wl
Wl
Wl
Wl
Wl
W)
Wl
EPA
RGN
04:;;;
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
06
06
06
OS
06
06
03
03
03
01
03
OJ
03
01
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1ft
05

-------
Pulp Manufacturers Data Summary
                Table B

Dala pulled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Dala (or Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System






Sector Statistics
Row?
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
185
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
20?
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
NAME
WESTVACOCORP.
UNION CAMP CORP
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
SONOCO PRODUCTS CO.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
BOWATERINC,
SOUTHERN CELLULOSE PRODUCTS IN
PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA
MEAD CORP
TAMKO ROOFING PRODUCTS. WC
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP
BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORP
PONDEROSA OF TENNESSEE
INLAND CONTAINER CORP.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP:
INLAND PAPERBOARD AND PACKAGIN
SIMPSON PASWJENA PAPER CO:
INLAND EASTEX
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
VIRGINIA FIBRE CORP
BEAR ISLAND PAPER CO, IP
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
WESTVACOCORP.
UNION CAMP CORP
STONE CONTAJNER CORP:
ST. LAURENT PAPER PRODUCTS COR
PUTNEY PAPER CO. INC:
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.
JAMES RIVER CORP.
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
SCOTT PAPER CO.
LONGVIEVV FIBRE CO.
NORTH PACIFIC PAPER CORP.
WEYERHAEUSER CO
OAISHOWA AMERICA CO. LTD
RAYONIER
PORT TOVWtSENO PAPER CORP.
INLAND EMPIRE PAPER CO.
BAitW fHVER FOREST PRODUCTS IN
SIMPSON TACOMA KRAFT CO
PONDERAY NEWSPRINT CO
BOISE CASCADE CORP
BOISE CASCADE CORP
KERWIN PAPER CO
REF1BRE
JAMES RIVER CORP
WAUSAU PAPER MILLS
APPLETON PAPERS INC.
GLOBE BUILDING MATERIALS INC
ECOFIBRE INC
FOX RIVER FIBER CO
POPE & TALBOT INC
FORD HOWARD CORP,
PROCTER AND GAMBLE
THILMANY PULP AND PAPER
REPAP WISCONSIN INC

Inspections (2 years
Air

Total

Average
See Note 1
3.1

1
2
J
2
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
NP
0
4
1
1
3
3
3
2
4
2
»
14
7
8
0
1
2
1
S
3
NP
1
3
1
1
1
B
1
NP
2
1
0
NP
2
3
0
2
NP
NP
1
0
0
1
3
Waler

Total

Average
See Note 1
27

4
7
t
t
3
NP
2
NP
a
2
NP
2
1
NP
1
1
t
2
D
1
0
2
NP
5
a
3
o
4
1
2
5
5
1
6
NP
4
S
4
6
0
2
3
1
2
3
2
NP
0
0
1
0
NP
NP
2
2
2
1
2
RCRA

Total

Average
SaaNoti 1
0.5

0
1
0
0
1
0
o
0
6
0
0
2
0
NP
0
2
1
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
5
Z
5
0
0
O
0
1
0
NP
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
n
2
0
0
NP
NP
NP
0
0
0
0
0


Total

Average
SaaNotal
5.4

5
10
B
10
S
2
2
1
ft
2
0
4
2
NP
1
7
4
4
5
4
i
4
5
7
17
22
9
17
1
3
7
6
7
9
NP
6
8
5
T
1
6
5
2
5
4
2
0
4
3
1
2
NP
NP
3
2
2
2
5
Historical Noncompliance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompiance
event)


Air

A«fW
SaaNota 1
1.0

0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NP
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
IS
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
NP:
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
NP
NP
2
2
0
3
2


Watar

Awjrage
See Note 1
16

0
0
0
2
0
0
tt
0
0
0
0
0
2
NP
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
3
1
4
NP
4
4
3
0
1
5
1
4
0
5
8
0
1
1
8
0
NP
NP
0
2
0
a
2


RCRA

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
O.S

a
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
a
0
0
1
0
NP
0
1
0
8
1
0
8
0
0
0
Q
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
NP
0
0
0
0
o
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
NP
NP
0
0
0
a
0


A. W, R

Average
SaaNota 2
2.6

a
0
0
7
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
1
2
NP
2
1
a
8
i
0
8
1
6
2
0
1
6
4
0
8
1
3
1
4
NP
4
4
3
0
1
5
1
4
0
5
8
0
1
1
8
8
NP
NP
2
t
0
3
3

Perrnt Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
• of
pollutants
overkmit

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
2.0

2
1
t
1
4
NP
2
NP
1
0
NP
1
2
NP
1
1
1
2
0
0
2
3
NP
2
2
0
0
1
0
0
t
3
1
1
NP
2
1
3
3
1
3
3
g
0
0
1
NP
2
3
3
0
NP
NP
0
t
2
2
0

* or poftjtarts
regulated

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
125

8
12
8
13
2»
NP
21
NP
8
13
NP
6
3
NP
7
10
9
13
0
8
11
13
NP
16
8
6
0
9
0
6
7
8
7
8
W
10
T
6
»
9
7
8
9
6
$
19
NP
16
29
18
0
NP
NP
10
1»
14
»
	 12_

i of reports
over Nmt

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
60

4
1
2
3
B
NP
e
NP
i
0
NP
3
4
NP
1
\
2
5
0
0
3
5
NP
2
S
0
0
9
0
0
3
11
S
5
NP
24
J
15
8
1
5
6
0
0
ft
1
NP
8
4
8
0
NP
NP
0
2
3
a
0

* of reports
sutxnttad

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
382.4

29?
372
178
300
1,061
NP
877
NP
142
271
NP
96
1S2
NP
125
244
223
164
0
269
298
267
NP
893
320
116
0
240
0
167
215
245
146
299
NP
356
139
122
483
200
183
237
1)7
138
265
289
NP
391
1,318
1.048
0
NP
NP
345
318
317
580
577

Significant Noncompiance Indicator


Air
Percent of
Faciktjes
SaaNota 1
19.4%

N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
NP
Y
Y
N
Y:
N
N:
N
NP
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
NP
NP
N
N:
N
N


Watar
Percent of
Facihbes
See Note 1
7.7%

N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
NP
N
N
NP
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
¥
Y
NP
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
NP
N
N
Y
N
NP
NP
N
N
N
N
N


RCRA
Percent of
Fac-kbas
SaaNotal
0.0%

N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W
N
N
N
N
fj
N
N
N
N
N:
N
N
N
N
N
NP
NP
NP
N
N
N
N
N


A'W-R

Average
See Note!
0.3

0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
:0
1
0
0
t
0
0
o
1
1
2
2
0
2
1
0
1
Q
Q
o
0
0
^
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1

Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years


Air

Avaraga
Sea Note 1
0,3

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ft
1
0
0
&
NP
ft
2
6
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
0
0
o
o
0
i
2
NP
Q
0
o
ft
rj
Q
Q
NP
0
^
0
NP
0
ft
0
0
NP
NP
0
0
0
0


water

Av»w
See Note 1
0.2

1
1
0
0
0
NP
0
NP
ft
0
f(P
0
0
NP
0
2
ft
0
0
0
1
0
:NP
0
ft
0
ft
0
0
2
S
5
1
4
NP
2
2
2
2
Q
]
2
0
0
(j
Q
NP
0
ft
0
0
NP
NP
0
0
0
6


RCRA

Average
See Note 1
0.0

a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
NP
0
0
0
0
g
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
rj
0
0
o
0
o
0
o
NP
Q
0
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
D
0
Q
Q
0
0
0
0
NP
NP
NP
0
0
0
0


Total

Average
See Note 1
b~5

1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
NP
0
4
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
3
0
0
2
6
5
t
6
NP
2
t
2
2
Q
^
2
Q
0
^
c
0
0
0
0
a
NP
NP
0
0
0
0
Note 1  Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2  Average of number of Quarters with a violation or noncompiance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Nole 3  Average number of programs in which faciities are considered to be In significant noncompiance (maximum varue=3)

Nole 5  ml ir^ca!" !! NOT cZ.™bt .Zs ilS, «dc£ 1^'"^^' "T T""!? " 1""** VehiCleS*"r; "* Mlls: ^ «"""'*
Note 6  1!!^^^^^^^                                         " °* *" 0bSWV"i°nS """
Note 7  Average of those with a soil amount reported
NP = no permit/ID* Identified; NC = value not calculated; Inact = Inactive permll/IDl.
                                                         "«™'**'.y; '™ and Steel Mis: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
               53

-------
                                                                                     Pulp Manufacturers Data Summary
                                                                                                      Table C

Data puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data (or Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System





Sector Statistics
;ow*
IT'S
176
177
178
m
180
181
182
183
184
1S5
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
703
204
205
206
20?
208
209
210
311
212
713
214
115
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
NAME
wEstvAco'coRp: 	
UNION CAMP CORP
STONE CONTAINER CORP:
NTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
SONOCO PRODUCTS CO.
NTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
BOWATER INC,
SOUTHERN CELLULOSE PRODUCTS IN
PACKAGING CORP Of AMERICA
MEAD CORP.
TAMKD ROOFING PRODUCTS; WO:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
BUCKEYE CeLlUlOS6 CORP
PONDEROSAOF TENNESSEE
NLANO CONTAINER CORP,
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL: CORP:
INLAND PAPERBOARO AND PACKAGIN
SIMPSON PASADENA: PAPER co:
INLAND EASTEX
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
VIRGINIA FIBRE CORP.
BEAR ISLAND PAPER CO. LP
GEORGIA'PACIFIC CORP
WESTVACOCORP.
UNION CAMP CORP
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
ST. LAURENT PAPER PRODUCTS COR
PUTNEY PAPER CO INC
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
JAMES RIVER CORP,
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
SCOTT PAPER CO
LONGVIEW FIBRE CO.
NORTH PACffIC PAPER CORP:
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
DAISHOWA AMERICA CO- LTD
RAYONIER
PORT T6WNS6ND PAPER CORP.
INLAND EMPIRE PAPER CO.
RAINY RIVER FOREST PRODUCTS IN
SIMPSON TACOMA KRAFT CO.
PONDERAY NEWSPRINT CO;:
BOISE CASCADE CORP.
BOISE CASCADE CORP.
KERWIN PAPER CO
REF1BRE
JAMES RIVER CORP.
WAUSAU PAPER MILLS
APPLETON PAPERS INC
GLOBE 8WLOING MATERIALS INC
ECOFIBRE INC.
FOX RIVER FIBER CO
POPE t, TALBOT INC.
FORD HOWARD CORP.
PROCTER AND GAMBLE
THILMANY PULP AND PAPER
REPAP WISCONSIN INC.

Production



***** 	
SM Notes 1« <
1.016

2,300
1,880
1.800

1,200

2,480
180
2,300
630
220

256
200
680
1.375
1.220
1,777
875
2,250
1,730
1.125
630
830
2.900
1.900
1,250
2.320
70
700
1,490
440

3.000
2.000
3,270
450
440
575
250
545
1.320
680
330
1.218
145
80
60
480

200

220
155
1,103

550
1.435

TRI Releases

199B- Tow Pounds


SMNote t
	 1.009,463

3.426,710
1.876.969
2.209.294
2.959.850
436,892
27.038
1,612.957
1.085.983
2.179,513
703.405
0
40.550
25S
5
1,521,255
916.090
1.427,557
1,704,914
1,223,380
927,665
2.045,376
402.790
8T.020
950.134
4.574,092
3.369,176
1.W7.TO
1,253.056
(met
1.038,640
1,3W,S70
563.51 S
615,780
661.950
NP
4.526.372
*7,0»6
1.263.370
509,402
Imct
10,000
884.995
7*,52fl
28
1.2S4,!56
Inact
tract
505
452,148
236.914
bKt
NP
NP
15.227
2,584,124
1
463,949
59,770

TRI Transfers

1998 - ToW Pounds

»<**»
SMNott 1
201.719

130,427
0
a
0
250
110
0
724,430
0
7
1,301
0
0
5
:0
0
0
0
4.998,000
0
0
0
172
0
0
0
4.172.200
0
Mact
2,026
17,000
0
260
0
NP
241.574
0
0
0
Inact
0
0
6
0
0
Inact
tnect
0
0
21,704
*HK(
NP
NP
565
89,150
0
0
2,461
TRI Releases * 	
Transfers per
Production Unit

pounds/ produchcn ixws

Average
See Notes Ij 5
11780

1.548-6
9995
1.227,4
NC
38*3
NC
8557
10.057.9
947.6
1.116.5
,:5,9
NC
10
0.1
1,9430
6677
442.3
9594
9.Z18.B.
412.3
1.16* 1
358.0
1087
1.144.7
1.575.S
1,7733
4.927,9
540.1
NC
1,486.7
8400
1'.280.7
NC
220.7
NG
1,458.1
1936
2.8713
8859
NC
18.4
670.5
109,6
0.1
1,037.1
NC
NC
8.4
942.0
NC
NC
NC
NC
101.9
2,405.5
NC
84J.S
434

TRI Releases -
Carcinogens

1996 - Total Pounds

Average
SeefMe 1
94718

122,797
181.650
134,820
294.500
8s>«or
27.038
104,680
0
140,500
47,890
0
40.550
0
0
0
396.964
M6.160
85.500
631,000
125,255
96,120
80.243
0
92.200
367.685
301,727
59,000
30,246
wad
299,863
334,055
44,000
1-H.4SO
44,015
NP
887,507
0
163,750"
6,080
Inact
0
76,704
g
0
27,964
Imct
Inset
0
203,000
0
««cf
NP
NP
0
77,250
0
19,91*
0
TRI Releases »
Transfers -
Metals

1996 -ToW Pounds

A»KW
See Note 1
' 55/143

128,660
104.750
0
0
1.0W
0
588,810
0
6
0
0
0
9
0
0
177.413
fr
0
0
0
0-
0
0
288.550
100,240
125,000
0
0
Inact
13.558
i,2SQ
0
0
0
NP
222.802
0
50.600
0
Inact
6
0
o
0
0
Imct
Imct
0
0
31.716
Inact
NP
NP
0
88,655
0
0
0

TRI Production -
Related Waste

1999 -Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
7,129,139

f4,841,178
8.816.728
7.884,OM
17.882.256
57$,W
39,691
5,129,384
6.856.272
9.241,000
2,141.264
32,400
0
5,952
1.354.310
1,514,000
1.907,005
8,r3i,28«
11,110.096
4.803,990
20.762.704
14,419,416
3.429.932
296.162
9.354.896
17.900,352
31.128.304
6.240.38B
4.904.568
lf*3
11,275,296
16,808,520
3,480.200
5,Jir,81S
8,140,388
NP
21,093.584
«7,0f6
4.238,100
3,723,080
Inact
78,800
8,037.788
115,203
30
7,626,268
Imct

40,874
1.172,560
260,917
(met
NP
NP
268,600
3,180,032
1
3.918,044
689,450

Pollutant Spils

Spil OccuroncB
Parcant ol
FacilbBS

377%

¥
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
¥
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
¥
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
ast 2 years)

#ol Spits

Avaraoa

3!6

1
3

2








1


4
\
2
5





2
3

1

1
12
1
5
3

6

3
2


1







1



1



1


Amu* Spiled |bs)

AMrag*

11,879

132
78

60








175


2.586
2,500

50





2,000
7,687

70


81,726
355
17T
1.067

10.377

5
21,007


70







250



1.151



47.000

Surrounding
Population
Residents nithn 3
nitos

AMrog*
SMNote!
24.957

34,424
2.061
use
10,451
«,232
761
2,246
41,588
1.452
29,973
72.995
6,049
1*1,471
69,889

8,401
7.42*
2.640
59.091
1,406

3,750
1,388
0
7,033:
8,175
22:219
3,041
1,831
45,616
12,966
9.919
36,181
23,579
23,579
33,233
15.631
17,075
3,800
33.276
44,706
59,824

44,509

86,532
82,153
7815
6,819
31,894
2,068
2,066
2,066
47,748
77,283
57,463
2io7a
45,543
Note 1: Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2 Average of number of quarters with • violation or noncompfance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs In which tadMta are considered to be in significant noncomplance. (maximum valued)
Note 4 This indcator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector: Automobile Assembly: vehicles/year; Pulp Mils: short Ions/day; Petroleum Refining: barrelsWay; Iron and Steel Mils: short loretfyear; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5: This Indicator Is NOT comparable across Industiy lectors. Average ii calculated lor etch sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 6: Average of those with at least one spil reported.
Note 7 Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP = no permiWD* Identified; NC = value not calculated; Inact = Inactive permit/ID*
                                                                                                              54

-------
                                      Pulp Manufacturers Location Data
                                                    Table A
Data puled on July 13.1996 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysts (IDEA) System
Row*
'Ml
242
:2'43
244
245
246
247
NAME
PONPEROSAPUIP PRODUCTS
FRASIER PAPERS INC.. PARK FALL
BADGER PAPER MIIU INC.
GEORGIA'PACIFIC CORP
WEYERHAEUSER CO
PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA
CONSOLIDATED PAPERS, INC.
STREET ADDRESS
2800 N MAIN ST.
200 N FIRST AVE.
200 W. FRONT ST.
100 WISCONSIN RIVER DR
200 GRAND AVE
N9090 COUNTY RD E
9504THAVE N
CITY
OSHKOSH
PARK FALLS
PESHTK3O
PORT EDWARDS
ROTHSCHILD
TOMAHAWK
WISCONSIN RAPIDS
ST
Wt
Wl
Wl
Wl
Wt
Wl
Wf
EPA
RGN
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
                                                  55

-------
                                                                                                  Pulp Manufacturers Data Summary
                                                                                                                  Table B

Data puled on Jury 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System






Sector Statistics
Row*
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
NAME
PONDEROSA PULP PRODUCTS
FRASIER PAPERS INC.. PARK FALL
BADGER PAPER MILLS INC
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
PACKAGING CORP. OF AMERICA
CONSOLIDATED PAPERS. INC


Inspections (2 years)
Air

Tot*

Avaraga
SaaNoto 1
3.1

NP
3
i
6
NP
1
1
Water

Total

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
27

NP
2
1
2
D
2
3
RCRA

Total

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
05

0
0
^
0
o
0
«


Total

Avaraga
S«Noto 1
54

0
5
3
t
D
3
10
Historical Noncomplance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncomptance
event)


Air

Avaraga
SMNoto 1
1.0

0
0
0
1
0
8
8


Water

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
1.6

ft
2
1
2
1
0
1


RCRA

Avarma
SaeNota 1
0.6

0
0
0
0
0
0
0


A. W. R

Avaraga
SaaNota:
26

0
2
1
3
1
e
8

Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
• of
poMarts
ovarimt

Aviraga
SaaNota 1
2.0

NP
2
a
1
i
0
1

iof pohjtants
ragulatad

Avaraga
SaaNotel
12.5

MP
12
«
18
17
16
«

aofraports
ovarlmrt

A/araga
SaaNola 1
6.0

NP
7
a
5
1 :
0
1

• orraports
submBad

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
382.4

NP
417
440
1.051
734
497
1.260


Significant Noncomplance Indicator


Air
Parcant of
Faahbas
SaaNota 1
19.4%

NP
Y
N
Y
NP
N
Y


water
Parcart of
Facrtbas
SaaNoto 1
7.7%

NP
N
N
N
N
N
	 N


RCRA
Parcart of
Facilbas
SaaNota t
00%

N
N
HI
N
N
N
N


A*W+R

Avaraga
SaaNota 3
0.3

0
1
«
1
0
0
1


Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years


Air

Avaraga
SaaNotal
0.3

l#>
0
6
0
W
0
0


Watar

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
0.2

NF>
0
ft
0
0
0
0


RCRA

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
0.0

0
0
a
0
a
0
0


Total

Avaraga
SaaNotel
0.5

D
0
B
0
D
0
0
Note 1: Average Is calculated across al entries wtth value of 0 or greater.
Note 2: Average of number of quarters with a violation or mncomplance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act. Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs In which fadHJes are considered to be In significant noncomplance. (maximum value=3)
Note 4: This indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector: Automobile Assembly: vehicles/year; Pulp Mils: short Ions/day, Petroleum Refining: barrete/day; Iron and Sled Mib: short Ions/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric Ions/year
Note 5 This Indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. Average Is calculated for each sector using only those observations wrth nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 6 Avenge of those with it least one spll reported
Note 7: Average of those with a soil amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID* Identified: NC = value not calculated; Inact = Inactive permit/ID*
                                                                                                                56

-------
                                                                                      Pulp Manufacturers Data Summary
                                                                                                      Table C
Data puled on July 13, 1 998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
2*1
242
243
244
245
246
?47
NAME
PONDEROSA PULP PRODUCTS
FRASIER PAPERS INC. PARK FALL
BADGER PAPER MILS INC
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.
WEYERHAEUSER CO.
PACKAGING CORP Of AMERICA
CONSOLIDATED PAPERS. INC.
Production
Short Tons/Day
Average
See Notes 1*4
1.016
200
375
225
500
350
1.370
982
TRI Releases
1998 -Total Pounds
Average
See Note i
1,009.463
tract
62.999
1,465
2,071.755
101,406
562.502
2.628.M4
TRI Transfers
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
201.719
(met
0
250
0
23.823
0
8.282.600
TRI Releases •
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ production irtts
Average
Saa Notas IX 5
1178.0
NO
168.0
r.e
4.143.5
357,«
410.6
tt.110.8
TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
Saa Nota 1
94,718
hact
30.045
0
92.061
0
0
35,000
TRI Releases +
Transfers -
Metals
199B- Total Pounds
Average
See Note i
39.143
mart
2.208
6
0
35,940
307.814
0
TRI Production -
Related Waste
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
See Note 1
7.129.139
toacf
6,378,512
),59<
9,313,408
2.535, W4
841,902
14i7ftt44
Potute.nl Spils (last 2 years)
Spil Occurranca
Percent ot
Facifctes

37.714
N
N
N
Y
1
N
Y
I of SPINS
Average
Sa*Nota6
36
3
1
4
Amount Spited (bs)
Avaraga
Saa Nota 7
11,879
90
50
S»
Surrounding
Population
Residents within 3
miles
Anrage
See Note 1
24,957
48.354
4.159
3.590
6.674
18.45)
3,316
	 *!>,ȣ
Note 1  Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2: Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3  Average number of programs in which fadilies are considered to be In significant noncomplance. (maximum value=3)
Note 4  This indlcalor Is NOT comparable across industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector: Automobile Assembly: vehides*/ear; Pulp Mils,  short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: barrete/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short Ions/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric Ions/year
Note 5  TNs Indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors. Average Is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 6  Average of those with at least one spil reported.
Note 7: Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP = no permit/ICW Identified, NC = value not calculated; Inact = inactive permit/ID*
                                                                                                              57

-------

-------
                                     Petroleum Refineries Location Data
                                                    Table A
Data puled on July 13,1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
e
7
B
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IS
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Vss
36
: »
38
39
40
41
42
!: 43
44
•: 45
46
: 47
4S
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
NAME
TESQRO ALASKA PETROLEUM CO
ARCO ALASKA INC.
MAPCOINC
PETRO STAR INC
ARCO ALASKA INC;
PETRO STAR INC.
COASTAL MOBILE REPINING CO
SHELL CHEMICAL CO.. MOBILE SIT
HUNT REFINING COMPANY INC
LION OIL CO INC
CROSS OIL t REFINING CO INC
BERRY PETROLEUM CO.
INTERMOUNf AIM REFINING CO., IN
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CAL
KERN Oil & REFINING CO
SAN JOAQUIN REFINING CO INC
SUNLAND REFINING CORP.
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
EXXON CORPORATION
HUNTWAY REFINING CO
CHEVRON USA INC
PACIFIC REFINING COMPANY
PETROLEUM FUEL* TERMINAL (TEX
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY
SHELL OIL COMPANY
TOSCO CORPORATION
WITCO CORPORATION
TENBY INC.
PARAMOUNT PETROLEUM CORP
CHEVRON USA INC
UNION OIL COMPANY OP CAL
POWERINE OIL COMPANY
LUNDAYTHAGARDCO.
MOBIL PETROLEUM COMPANY INC
HUNTWAY REFINING CO
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
ULTRAMAR INC
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CAL
COLORADO REFINING
CONOCO INC
STAR ENTERPRISE
YOUNG REFINING CORPORATION
CITSO ASPHALT REFINING CO.
BHP PETROLEUM AMERICAS REF
CHEVRON USA INC
CLARK OIL & REFINING CORP
CLARK OIL » REFINING CORP
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
INDIAN REFINING PARTNERSHIP
UNO-VEN COMPANY
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
SHELL OIL COMPANY
LAKETON REFINING INC
COUNTRYMARK COOPERATIVE INC.
AMOCO OIL CO-
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES INC
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
STREET ADDRESS
KENAI SPUR ROAD
NORTH SLOPE
1100 H1H LANE
1200 HIM LANE



400 INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY, EXTENS

1000MCHENRYST
424 SASTSTH STREET
HWY 57-N-BERRY RD

2555 WILLOW ROAD






324WELSEGUNDO
4901 SAN PABLO AVE
2050 EtHSON WAY

3485 PACHECO BLVD
AVON REFINERY


14708 DOWNEY AVE


12354 LAKELAND AVE
3301 S GARFIELD
3700 WEST 190THST
1651 ALAMEOA ST
2101 E PACIFIC COAST

1660 W. ANAHEIM ST
5800 BRIGHTON BLVO
5801 BRIGHTON BLVD.
2000 WRANGLE HB.LRD
7982 HUEY ROAD
FOUNDATION DRIVE
91-325 KOMOHANA ST,
91-480 MALAKOLS, C1P

20t£ HAWTHORNE

B7THST
135THSTJ.NEWAVE
MARATHON AVENUE

2784 WEST LUKENS LAK
1200 REFINERY RD
28 15 INDIANAPOLIS BL
1400 S. M ST.
B36-T16E-R34S
1401 S DOUGLAS ROAD
CITY
KENAI
KUPARUK
NORTH POLE
NORTH POLE
PRUOHOEBAY
VALDEZ
CHICKASAW
SARALAND
TUSCALQOSA
EL DORADO
SMACROVER
STEPHENS
FREDONIA
ARROYO GRANDE
BAKERSFIELO
BAKERSFIELD
BAKERSFIELO
BAKERSFIELD
BENICIA
BENICIA
ELSEGUNDO
HERCULES
LONG BEACH
LOS ANGELES
MARTINEZ
MARTINEZ
OHDAtG
OXNARD
PARAMOUNT
RICHMOND
RODEO
SANTA FE SPRINGS
SOUTH GATE
TOR RANGE
WILMINGTON
WILMINGTON
WILMINGTON
WILMINGTON
COMMERCE CITY
COMMERCE CITY
DELAWARE CITY
DOUGLASVILLE
SAVANNAH
EWA BEACH
KAPOtEl
BLUE ISLAND
HARTFORD
JOLIET
LAWHENCEyiLlE
LEMONT
ROBINSON
ROXANA/WOODR
LAKETON
MOUNT VERNON
WHITING
ARKANSAS CITY
COFFEYVILLE
EL DORADO
ST
AK
AK
AK
AK
AK
AK
AL
AL
AL
AR
AR
AR
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
DE
GA
GA
HI
HI
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
IN
IN
KS
K.S
KS
EPA
RGN
10
10
10
10
10
10
04
04
04
06
06
06
09
09
OS
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
O9
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
08
08
03
04
<)«
09
09
05
05
05
05
05
OS
05
05
05
35
07
07
07
                                                       59

-------
                                                                                                  Petroleum Refineries Data Summary
                                                                                                                    Table B

Data pulled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System






Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
WME
TESORO ALASKA PETROLEUM CO
ARCO ALASKA INC
MAPCOINC
PETRO STAR INC.
ARCO ALASKA INC.
PETRO STAR INC
COASTAL MOBILE RCTINHWS CO
SHELL CHEMICAL CO.. MOBILE SIT
HUNT REFINING COMPANY INC
LION OIL CO INC
CROSS OIL ft REFINING CO INC
BERRY PETROLEUM CO.
NTERMOUNTAIN REFINING CO. IN
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CAL
KERN Oil 8. REFINING CO.
SAN JOAQUIN REFINING CO INC
SUNLAND REFINING CORP.
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
EXXON CORPORATION
HUNTWAY REFINING CO.
CHEVRON USA INC
PACIFIC REFINING COMPANY
PETROLEUM FUEL & TERMINAL (TEX
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY
SHELL Oil COMPANY
TOSCO CORPORATION
WITCOCORPORiATION
TENBY INC.
PARAMOUNT PETROLEUM CDRP
CHEVRON USA INC
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CAt
POWERINE OIL COMPANY
LUNDAY THAGARD CO.
MOBIL PETROLEUM COMPANY INC
HUNTWAY REFINING CO
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
ULTRAMAR INC
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CAL
COLORADO R£flN|N<3
CONOCO INC
STAR ENTERPRISE
YOUNG REFINING CORPORATION
CJTCO ASPHALT REFINING CO.
BMP PETROLEUM AMERICAS REF
CHEVRON USA INC
CLARK OIL 4 REFINING CORP
CLARK OIL * REFINING CORP
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
INDIAN REFINING PARTNERSHIP
UNO-VEN COMPANY
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
SHELL OIL COMPANY
LAKETON REFINING INC
COUNTRYMARK COOPERATIVE INC.
AMOCO OIL CO
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES INC
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING

nspections (2 years
Air

Total


SaaNota 1
35

::• 	 :0
NP
0
1
1
0
4
5
4
4
1
1
0
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
1
0
3
1
0
2
NP
3
1
1
3
3
2
2
3
3
0
5
3
22
3
2
2
1
NP
10
NP
NP
NP
14
10
0
3
17
4
2
11
Water

Total


So Note 1
2.2

;:;: :ii:i
NP
0
NP
0
0
3
2
1
3
2
3
NP
3
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
NP
1
1
NP
2
0
1
0
NP
1
5
0
2
NP
2
NP
3
t
1
1
1
23
0
2
NP
D
0
4
1
NP
2
2
5
3
8
2
2
4
2

RCRA

TOM


SaaNota 1
2.6

•:':':':'::M'4
0
2
0
2
0
1
3
10
6
0
NP
NP
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Iff
13
6
2
ft
3
4
3
2
1
0
5
12
10
0
6
6
5
12
2


Total

Avafeoa
SaaNota 1
7.6

;::;;::;::5
0
2
1
3
0
t
10
15
13
4
4
0
5
2
2
7
2
1
2
i
2
0
5
f
1
3
0
4
7
1
5
3
5
2
6
4
1
16
17
Sf
5
4
5
9
3
15
2
0
7
28
25
3
17
27
11
18
15
Historical NoncompHance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompHance
event)


Air

Av»«.
SMNott 1
2.0

;:::;:::::0
b
0
0
0
8
0
2
0
0
0
4
D
0
0
0
8
6
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
1
0
8
0
0
g
0
0
a
0
0
0
«
8
0
0
a
0
1
2


Wat"

A«afaaa
SaaNota 1
2.0

l':;::::::.^
	 b
6
0
0
8
0
3
0
1
0
1
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
i
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
a
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
D
3
6
1
0
0
2
0
4
0
1
8
8
7


RCRA

Avaraga
SaaNota t
3.7

;:::;;;::::i
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
a
8
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
g
0
8
B
0
a
8
8
8
0
B
«
6
a
0
a
0
t
8
0
8
a
B
8
8


A W R

Avaraga
SMNott 2
4.9

::;:::;;;;:;;;;:3
	 g
s
0
0
8
0
5
2
8
0
5
0
0
0
0
8
6
2
2
8
1
0
0
»
8
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
8
0
8






0
a
8
6
a
1
8
0
*
8
4
e
a
8
8
8

Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Ad (2
year data)
lot
pohjtants
OOTtmit

Aviraja
SMNota 1
4.1

•'::.:.':--:.'.lt
NP
0
NP
0
0
0
5
i
4
5
2
NP
15
NP
NP
NP
NP
4
NP
3
10
NP
2
2
4
«
NP
0
0
S
3
NP
5
NP
6
0
0
2
6
8
0
0
NP
2
0
a
4
NP
1
2
2
2
3
S
0
8
5

totpolutants
raotlataa

A»araga
SMNota t
25.9

'•• K:-:\t
NP
0
NP
D
0
0
20
19
20
13
21
NP
88
NP
NP
NP
NP
47
NP
89
43
NP
115
42
100
&
NP
Q
130
117
120
NP
114
NP
14
0
12
18
31
14
0
u
NP
16
0
11
15
NP
14
19
16
18
11
18
18
20
19

1 of reports
ovaf fcnut

Avngt
SaaNota 1
11.2

i;;.: ;;;.3S
NP
0
NP
D
0
0
8
7
6
11
3
NP
45
NP
NP
NP
NP
7
NP
E
31
NP
3
3
10
a
NP
D
0
7
4
NP
6
NP
18
D
0
2
16
9
0
a
NP
2
0
19
9
NP
3
3
5
3
4
8
0
32
14

t of reports
sutxnttud

Avwagt
SMNota 1
874.2

• •'-'-• --4K
NP
0
NP
0
0
0
1.276
48S
952
54)
407
rs>
950
M»
NP
NP
NP
1.416
NP
748
745
NP
1.143
1,280
1,014
0
NP
0
2.767
1,97*
3.307
NP
2.719
Nf>
306
0
312
532
4.208
587
0
0
NP
282
0
254
736
NP
575
874
966
833
253
709
483
438
414

Sianlficant Noneomptance Indicator


Air
Pareartol
Faciwas
SaaNotal
363%

::::::•::'::<(
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
: N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
tt
N
Y
NP
Y
NP
NP
NP
¥
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
N


watar
Parcart of
Facihtias
SaaNotal
6.114

::::::::: Y
NP
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
N
NP
Y
N
NP
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
NP
N
MP
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N


RCRA
Parcart at
Faciltjas
SaaNota 1
123%

::::•::•:::$
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
NP
NP
N
N
N
N
N
tt
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N


A+W'R

wngi
SaaNota 3
0.5

;-::;;:;;::::;;:j:'
6
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
6
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
ft
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ft
0
0
1
2
1
1
2
ft
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
2
1
0
1
0
2
0

Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years


Air

A~aca
SaaNotal
1.1

'::• \W\\0
NP
•f
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
4
2
4
D
NP
1
1
9
0
1
2
0
1
D
0
t
0
1
0
d
2
D
NP
1
NP
NP
NP
2
1
D
0
0
0
0
1


Watar

A»TO
SaaNotal
0.3

::i:::;;:;i
NP
0
NP
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NP
0
NP
NP
NP
NP
d
NP
g
1
NP
0
0
0
0
NP
0
1
1
0
NP
0
NP
0
g
0
0
0
1
0
d
NP
D
0
1
2
NP
0
d
0
a
0
0
0
0
0


RCRA

Avaraj»
SaaNotal
0.3

: :':•:•: :!:':S
0
0
0
0
0
fl
1
1
1
0
NP
NP
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

-------
                                                                                    Petroleum Refineries Data Summary
                                                                                                    Table C

Data puled on July 13, 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System





Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
NAME
TESORO ALASKA PETROLSUM CO
ARCO ALASKA INC.
MAPCOINC
PETRO STAR INC
ARCO ALASKA INC
PETRO STAR INC
coAstAi MOBILE REFININQ co.
SHELL CHEMICAL CO , MOBILE SIT
HUNT REFINING COMPANY INC
LION OIL CO INC
CROSS OIL:* REFINING, co INC
BERRY PETROLEUM CO.
1NTERMOUNTASM REFffflNG CO. , IN
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CAL
KERN;6lL t REFINING CO
SAN JOAQUIN REFINING CO INC
SUNLANO REFINING CORP:
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
EXXON CORPORATION
HUNTWAY REFINING CO
CHEVRON USA INC
PACIFIC REFINING COMPANY
PETROLEUM FUEL & TERMINAL (TEX
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY
SHELL OIL COMPANY
TOSCO CORPORATION
WITCO CORPORATION
TENBYINC.
PARAMOUNT PETROLEUM CORP
CHEVRON USA INC
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CAL
POWERINE OIL COMPANY
LUNDAY THAGARD CO
MOBIL PETROLEUM COMPANY INC
HUNTWAY REFINING CO:
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
ULTRAMAR INC
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CAL
COLORADO REFINING
CONOCO INC
STAR ENTERPRISE
YOUNG REFINING CORPORATION
CITOO ASPHALT REFIMNS co
BHP PETROLEUM AMERICAS REF
CHEVRON USA INC
CLARK OIL & REFINING CORP '
CLARK OIL 1 REFINING CORP
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
INDIAN REFINING PARTNERSHIP
UNO-VEN COMPANY
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
SHELL OIL COMPANY
LAKETON RERNING INC
COUNTRYMARK COOPERATIVE INC
AMOCO OIL CO
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
FARMLAND INDUSTRIES INC
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING


Production

BgrTels/Day

Average
See Notes 14 4
94.963

72,000
12,000
128,200
10.000
15.000
26.300
18.500
71.000
33,500
51,000
6,200
6,700
3.800
42.000
21.400
24.300
12,000
60.800
128.000
9,000
230.000
50.000
10.800
237.000
148,900
160.000

4.000
46,500
230,000
77,000
46,500
8,100
130,000
5,500
64,000
68:000
127.500
28.000
57.500
140,000
5.540
26.000
93.500
54.000
80.515
62,500
188.000
80,750
147.000
175.000
268,000
11.100
22.000
410,000
56.000
100,000
94.600


TRI Releases

1996- Total Pounds

Average
SeeNotel
484.894

276,546
NP
36,200
255
:NP
500
97,716
160,768
157,344
1,321.957
a
0
Inacf
4.351
>,648
8,555
toct
126,730
1,468.973
1.435
2.203.84C
5.672
116
759,906
1,075,668
1.198.262
Inact
NP
14.301
1,487,330
596,350
toct
tod
1.017.246
875
208.668
40.669
725.696
62.4SO
153,633
162,642
1.015
2T.99)1
29.957
282.250
174.635
132,660
146,518
toct
120.970
316,973
1.050.039
570
35.663
977.4S9
296.718
2,097,334
714.279


TRI Transfers

1996 -Total Pounds

Average
SeeNotel
156.801

21,700
NP
540
0
NP
0
1.905
2.051
0
8,005
0
0
Inact
75
1.092
0
toet
16,425
32.050
2,045
61.570
0
0
1.008.592
26,220
69.889
Inact
NP
75.570
123,677
49,960
toct
toct
529.746
465:
246.943
195.597
96.754
210,015
5.608
12,134
0
0
1,473
4.855
93,400
3.03S
40.238
toct
28.215
28.226
214,553
0
0
114,815
92.593
3,779
216.831
TRI Releases *
Transfers per
Production Unit

pounds/ production unts

Average
See Notes 14 5
8.2

4.1
NC
6.3
00
NC
0.0
60
2.3
4.7
26.1
0.0
0.0
NC
01
O.S
0.4
:NC
2.4
11.9
04
9.9
01
00
7.5
7,4
79
MC
NC
1,8
70
ft.4
NC
NC
119
0.2
7.1
3.5
6.5
?.7
28
1,3
0.2
1.0
0.3
5.3
3.3
2.2
1.0
NC
1.0
2:0
47
0.1
1.6
27
7.0
21,0
98

TRI Releases -
Carcinogens

1996. Total Pounds

Averaoe
See Note 1
24,237

31,181
NP
6.050
255
NP
500
6,452
16,676
5,110
84,190
0
0
Inact
130
171*
0
toct
3.500
27,051
180
30.101
291
16
6,063
4,253
8,606
toet
NP
1.5BO
5.549
3,200
Inact
toct
8,641
90
2,750
1.937
2,665
10,900
6,267
33,900
505
1.30T
4.234
W.870
17,223
6,780
8,240
toct
15,600
28,391
139.604
0
5.427
13,341
28.778
87,568
	 43.931
TRI Releases *
Transfers -
Metals

1996 -Total Pounds

Average
SeeNotel
24.199

5,212
NP
0
0
NP
0
0
994
0
1.820
0
0
Inset
0
0
0
tod
14.390
11.148
0
47.305
0
0
108.039
7,929
64.947
tod
NP
9,024
133,081
41,050
had
tod
59.394

39.301
469
25.298
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23.321
tod
14.465
0
210.448
7
0
75,636
26,310
0
	 55,906

TRI Production -
Related Waste

1996 - Total Pounds

Average
SeeNotel
15.360.841

410,451
NP
S4.717
33
NP
228
99,008
196.262
157,344
2,356.562
0
0
(met
115,230
117,747
8,555
toct
5,253.136
27,478,864
52,665
3.384.030
169,050
m
2,974.214
18,436,016
1,067.069
Inart
NP
93,631
944.397.312
755,730
tod
toct
30.842.576
s,vta
1.345.462
23S.749
807,022

336^895
428,375
1.000
27JBW
3,343.342
434,347
267.923
20.40*,406
11.558,488
:toct
1.680,710
1066.417
13,581.152
586
35.929
9,441,656
16,303.384
2,105,1:16
4.981.660


PcJutant Spils

Spl Occurrence
Percent of
Facihties

642%

V
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
V
N
¥
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
¥
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
¥
Y
Y
Y
Y
N

Y
¥
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
¥
Y
Y
Y
Y
ast 2 years)

tor Soils

Average
See Notes
8.1

1






6
2


4

8
1


15
15

1


3
10
7


12
3
10
2

29

29
2
8
t
1
3

.
9
2
7
4
12
13
8
7
2
3
23
1
37
6


Amourt Spiled (fcs)

Average
See Note?
17.392

t






16,518
42


16.758

982
568


6.811
47,781




1.365
84,150
22,294


61.Z1J
1.640
2.627
37.296

48.456

57.121
6,800
510
20,475

3,568


37.237
97,048
62
12,240
1,939
21,853
101.094
9,261
4,170
42.100
55,415
1,642

Surrounding
Population
Residents within 3
miles

Aven»
See Note 1
38.364

1,297

5.T19
6.723
6.723

36,69?
16.196
21,232
18.707
2.945:
1,044
29
4.323
14,140
63,700
40,459
59,455
25.514
34.081
60.410
36,113
171,230
165,516
34,709
6,012
62,660
44.180
271.539
15.035
23,590
191,037
307,638
221,611
169,472
176,103
136.216
169,792
41,644
42,658
5,717
18 659
21^052

5352
116,574
12,44?
9.033
5655
2/302
3,731
18,133
1.513
7,852
49,267
9,247
10,556
Note 1  Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2. Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncompliance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs In which facilities are considered to be in significant noncompliance. (maximum vahje=3)

Nc£ 5 ™s Men" is NOT cZ^ot £os! !±s£ '2°" T """V^u^i0," "T ^I0m0bi"> ASMmWy: """*»*•": Pu*> MIBs: short ">"*""* P*"*""" "««"»: barrels/day; Iron and Steel MHs: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Nrte 6  Averagt of mo«^nth atteaSh£!e    I re    ed                  calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 7  Average of those with a spin amount reported
NP = no permit/1 D« identified: NC = value not calculated; Inact = Inactive permit/in*
                                                                                                                 61

-------
                                    Petroleum Refineries Location Data
                                                   Table A
Data puted on July 13,1998 from Integrated Data fcx Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
87
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
i»3
84
55
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
NAME
NATIONALCOOP REFINERY ABBN
ASHLAND OIL INC
SOMERSET REFINERY INC IL
EXXON CORPORATION
BP EXPLORATION SOILING
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
CANAL REFINING CO.
STAR ENTERPRISE
KERR-MCGEE REFINING CORP
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
TRANSAMERICA REFINING CO
VALERO REFINING COMPANY - LOUI
CALCASIEU REFINING CO,
CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
GOLD LINE REFINING LTD.
ARCADIA REFINING (FORMERLY DUB
MURPHY OIL USA INC
SHELL OIL COMPANY
PLACID REFINING CO
CALUMET LUBRICANTS CO L P.
PENNZOtt PRODUCING CO (ATLAS
ST. ROSE REFINING INC
CONOCO INC
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
KOCH REFINING COMPANY INC
ASHLANPOMNC
SOUTHLAND OIL COMPANY
CHEVRON USA INC
SOUTHLAND OIL COMPANY
BARRETT REFINING CORP
ERGON INC
CONOCO INC
EXXON CORPORATION
MONTANA REFINING CO,
CENEX INC
AMOCO OIL CO,
BAYWAY REFINING COMPANY (FORME
CITOO ASPHALT REFtNJNfi COMPANY
MOBIL OIL CO.
CHEVRON USA INC
AMERADA HESS (PORT READING) CO
COASTAL EAGLE POINT OH, CO
NAVAJO REFINING COMPANY
SLOOMFIELD REFINING COMPANY
GIANT INDUSTRIES ARIZONA INC
PETRO SOURCE REFIMNS PARTNBIS
ASHLAND OIL INC
BP EXPLORATION AND Olt INC
BP OIL CORP.
SUN COMPANY INC (R& Ml
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
CYRIL PETROCHEMICAL CORP.
CONOCO INC.
BARRETT REFINING CORP.
SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION
BUN COMPANY INC (R&M)
WYNNEWOOD REFINING COMPANY
STREET ADDRESS
2000 S. MAIN

PO BOX 1547. 600 WON
4045 SCENIC/BOX 551
AU.IANC R8F/H23 12MS
RIVER ROAD 6 89 APH
HWY 357
HWYS 70 S 44

GARYVILLE REF/HWY 61
H902«vwRo«d
PO BOX 453
TANK FARM RD
4401 LOUISIANA HIGHWAY 108
4646 OLD TOWN RD
CLAIBORNE REF/2.5MSE
2500 EST BERNARD HY
EAST SITE REFIN/H61W
1940 HWV 1 NORTH
HWY 157 2.5M N 1-20
3333 MIDWAY STREET

2210 OLD SPANISH TR
E SUPERIOR ST. PO BO
13DOSFORTST
12555 CLAYTON BLVD.
100W3ROAV6
HIGHWAY 11 NORTH
HWY 811.BAYOU CASOTT
HWY 11 NORTH

HARBOR PROJECT ROAD
401SZ3RDST
700 EXXON ROAD
1900 10TH STREET N£
US 21 2. SOUTH OF LAU
MANOAtt AVE 4: OLD RED
PO.BOX 222/1400 PA
4 PARADISE ROAWW.DE
BILLINGSPORT ROAD
12IIOSTATE:STRJEET;
750 CLIFF ROAD
ROUTE 130




PO BOX 81 70
1150SMETCALF5TREE
CEDAR POINT ROAD
WOODVILLERpAB
EOFI-35ON1STARD
2 W MAIN
1000 S PINE
5MIE.3MISOFTHOM
902 W25TH STREET
1700 S UNION STREET
906 S. POWELL
CITY
MC PHERSON
RUSSELL/CATLETTSBU
SOMERSET
BATON ROUGE
BELLE CHASSE
CHALMETTE
OHURCM POINT
CONVENT
COTTON VALLEY
GARYVILLE
N*»S«W
KROTZ SPRINGS
LAKE CHARLES
LAKE CHARLES
LAKE CHARLES
LISBON
MERAUX
NORCO
PORT ALLEN
PRINCETON
SHRSVETORT
ST. ROSE
WESTLAKE
ALMA
DETROIT
ROSEMOUNT
SAINT PAUL PARK
LUMBERTON
PASCAGOULA
SANDERSVILLE
V1CKSBURO
VICKSBURG
B9LUNGS
BILLINGS
GREAT FALLS
LAUREL
MANDAN
LINDEWBAYWAY
PAJULS8ORO
PAULSBORO
PERTH AMBOY
PORT READING
WESTMUE
ARTESIA
BLOOMFIELO
GALLUP
EAGLE SPRINGS
CANTON
LIMA
TOLEDO (OREGON)
TOLEDO/OREGON
ARDMORE
CYRIL
PONCACITY
THOMAS (CUSTES)
TULSA
TULSA
WYNNEWOOD
ST
KS
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA:
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
Ml
Ml
MN
MN
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MT
MT
MT
MT
NO
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NM
MM
NM
NV
OH
OH
OH
OH
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
EPA
RGN
07
04

-------
Petroleum Refineries Data Summary
            Table B

Data pulled on July 13. 1996 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System






Sector Statistics
Row*
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
jy
78
79
80
81
82
83
64
IS
66
87
88
69
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
NAME
NATIONAL COOP REFINERY ASSN
ASHLAND OIL INC
SOMERSET REFINERY INC IL
EXXON CORPORATION
BP EXPLORATION S OIL INC
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
CANAL REFINING CO
STAR ENTERPRISE
KERR-MCGEE REFINING CORP.
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
TRANSAMERICA REFINING CO.
VALERO REFINING COMPANY - LOUI
CALCASIEU REFINING CO:
CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
GOLD LINE REFINING LTD
ARCADIA REFINING (FORMERLY DUB
MURPHY OIL USA INC
SHELL OIL COMPANY
PLACID REFINING CO
CALUMET LUBRICANTS CO L.P.
PENNZOIL PRODUCING CO. (ATLAS
ST. ROSE REFINING INC.
CONOCO INC
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
KOCH REFINING COMPANY INC
ASHLAND OIL INC
SOUTHLAND OIL COMPANY
CHEVRON USA INC
SOUTHLAND OIL COMPANY
BARRETT REFINING CORP.
ERGON INC
CONOCO INC
EXXON CORPORATION
MONTANA REFINING CO.
CENEX INC
AMOCO OIL CO.
BAYWAY REFINING COMPANY (FORME
CITGO ASPHAtT REFINING COMPANY
MOBIL OIL CO
CHEVRON USA INC
AMERADA HESS (PORT READING) CO
COASTAL EAGLE POINT OIL CO.
NAVAJO REFINING COMPANY
BLOOMFIELD REFINING COMPANY
GIANT INDUSTRIES ARIZONA INC
PETRO SOURCE REFINING PARTNERS
ASHLAND OIL INC
BP EXPLORATION AND OIL INC
BP OIL CORP.
SUN COMPANY INC (RAM)
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
CYRIL PETROCHEMICAL CORP;
CONOCO INC
BARRETT REFINING CORP.
SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION
SUN COMPANY INC (R & M)
WYNNEWOOD REFINING COMPANY


Inspections (2 years)
Air

Total

Average
SMNote 1
3.5

3
6
2
1
4
1
3
3
1
1
3
5
3
2
3
2
4
2
2
2
3
2
2
5
0
1
1
3
1
NP
1
3
2
4
3
3
4
2
3
9
2
5
2
2
2
1
2
2
4
3
4
0
7
0
4
2
1
Water

Total

Average
SMNotel
22

0
6
3
2
2
4
0
2
2
2
2
3
2
4
2
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
NP
1
0
2
2
3
0
2
1
1
o
1
3
6
t
2
1
5
2
NP
a
NP
NP
3
4
2
0
1
0
2
NP
3
2
2
RCRA

Total

Average
See Note 1
2.6

10
1
4
6
S
3
1
2
1
2
S
1
1
6
6
1
S
2
0
2
0
5
4
1
5
1
2
8
2
1
0
6
4
4
4
9
5
0
1
4
5
4
3
3
2
1
1
5
4
2
3
0
5
0
4
3
2


Total

Average
SMNote 1
7.6

13
13
a
9
11
8
4
7
5
5
10
9
6
12
11
4
12
6
5
7
6
10
8
8
6
2
5
13
6
1
3
to
7
8
8
12
15
3
6
14
12
11
5
5
4
2
6
11
10
5
8
0
14
g
11
7
5
Historical Noncompiance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompiance
event)


Air

Average
SMNote 1
2.0

1
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
8
0
8
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
8
0
0
0
S
6
•s
0
5
3
e
0
0
8
8
8
8
0
0
1
0
5
4
0


water

Average
SMNotel
2.0

0
4
8
2
2
3
8
0
7
0
0
0
0
2
0
3
2
1
0
0
4
0
1
7
0
8
B
0
p
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
5
6
8
8
8
8
B
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
0
1
0
1
0
0
1


RCRA

Averege
SMNotel
37

2
8
8
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
a
4
8
8
4
0
0
0
5
8
0
8
7
4
0
4
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
8
0










2
8
0
0
0
1
0
0


A W R

Average
SMNote2
49

3
8
8
3
2
3
a
1
7
0
0
0
g
6
a
4
8
8
6
0
4
0
S
8
0
8
8
4
0
4
a
0
2
8
8
0
5
8
«
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
0
8
8
8
8
8
0
1
0
6
4
1

Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
• of
porutanls
overkmit

Average
SMNote 1
4.1

0
10
8
6
0
7
0
2
8
2
0
0
1
7
0
0
3
4
4
0
6
3
3
1
NP
2
2
2
1
1
Q
4
1
1
0
0
4
3
0
0
1
1
0
NP
0
NP
NP
3
7
9
g
1
n
5
NP
5
1
6
Note 1 Average Is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater

f of pollutants
regulated


SMNota i
259

b
25
2B
24
23
21
0
15
19
22
0
13
16
22
0
0
13
13
16
0
26
21
28
20
NP
17
15
13
15
15
0
13
15
16
14
23
16
86
5
21
23
19
18
NP
0
NP
NP
23
36
34
28
15
0
15
NP
13
12
	 29


tor reports
overitnrt


SMNote 1
11.2

0
44
16
16
D
16
0
5
20
4
0
0
t
12
0
0
3
6
24
0
15
4
8
14
NP
2
4
4
2
1
0
16
1
2
0
0
9
4
0
0
.1
1
e
NP
o
NP
NP
12
18
25
Q

0
8
NP
5
•(



t of reports
submlted

Average
SMNotoi
874.2

0
2,585
-3,832
568
754
1,470
(*
460
502
1,170
6
532
814
1,453
0
0
1,586
407
775
0
S20
386
1,521
528
NP
391
345:
299
877
345
0
827
307
445
296
374
843
2,967
699
925
838
1,518

NP
0
NP

393
91&
980
603
805
n
466
NP
368
275




Significant Noncompiance Indicator


Air
Percert of
Facilities
SMNote 1
36.3%

N
Y
y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
y
N
N
N
NP
N
N
Y
y
N
N
N
Y
N

..
(,
Y

N
N
Y
Y
Y
y
Y
y
Y
N
Y
y




Water
Percent of
Fecihtes
SMNotel
6.1%

N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Kl
N
N
N
N
Y
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N

N
ft)
N

NP

NP


N
N
N
N
N
N
N




RCRA
Percent of
Fecitbes
SMNotel
12.3%

N
N
y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
U
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N

N
N
Y

N
N
N
N
N
Y

N
Y
N
M




A*W+R

Average
SMNote 3
0.5

0
1
2
1
0
1
0
0
6
0
4
0
5
0
1
1
0
0
Q
1
0
0
1
2
0
2

0
0
0
0
0
0
1
i
o
e
o

o

o
d
2

Q
0

1
1
2
i
J
1
1
1
1



Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years


Air

Average
SMNote 1
1.1

0
8
t
1
4
2
1
1
0
0
a
0
0
2
4
0
2
2
1
1
3
1
S
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
NP
0
o
o
5
0
0
4
3
12
7

4

r]
Q
Q
2
0
0
4

Q
2
0
0
1



water


SMNotel
0.3

0
4
a
0
g
1
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
NP
0
•f
1
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
o
D
0
0
1
Q

g
NP

NP
NP
rj
rj
0


0
NP
6
0



RCRA

Average
SMNote 1
03

a
0
2
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
o
0
o

1

o

Q

Q

Q

4

0

u
JO
0
1
0
fl



Total

Average
SMNote 1
1.6

0
12
J
2
8
3
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
3
4
1
3
2
2
1
4
1
6
2
0
2
i
2
0
1
0
0
o
o
5
o
o
5
2
13






(j
2
rj
0

1
c
2
1
0
1

Note 2 Average of number ot quarters with a violation or noncompiance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act. Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs In which faciltles are considered to be In significant noncompiance (maximum value=3)
Note t TNsiJSc'S is NOT cZa'raSe' a^s Int?" "H" I" """Vt _?£' "IT f™*"'^^ vehicles/year; Pulp Mils: short tons/day: Petroleum Refining: barrets/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short tons^ear: Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 6: A«rag1 oHhos?w«h attea* o£ spi"e^rted «l«*>led for each sector usmg onry those observations with nonzero values tor BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 7: Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP » no permit/ID* identified: NC = value not calculated; inact = inactive permit/ID*
              63

-------
                                                                                       Petroleum Refineries Data Summary
                                                                                                        Table C

D«t« pulled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System





Sector Statistics
few*
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
to
«1
92
K
64
«
96
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
109
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
MAME
NATIONAL COOP REFINERY ASSN
ASHLAND OIL INC
SOMERSET REFINERY INC (Li
EXXON CORPORATION
BP EXPLORATION! Oil INC
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
CANAL REFINING CO-
STAR ENTERPRISE
KERR-MCGEE REFINING CORP.
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
TftANSAM ERICA REFINING CO.
VALERO REFINING COMPANY - LOUI
CALCASIEU REFINING CO
CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
GOtb LINE REFINING LTD
ARCADIA REFINING (FORMERLY DUB
MURPHY Oil USA INC
SHELL OIL COMPANY
PLACID REFINING CO.
CALUMET LUBRICANTS CO L.P.
PENNZOR. PRODUCING CO. (ATLAS
ST. ROSE REFINING INC
CONOCO INC
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
KOCH REFINING COMPANY INC
ASHLAND OIL INC
SOUTHLAND OIL COMPANY
CHEVRON USA INC!
SOUTHLAND OIL COMPANY
BARRETT REFINING CORP.
ERGON INC
CONOCO INC
EXXON CORPORATION
MONTANA REFINING CO.
CENEX INC
AMOCO OIL CO.
BAYWAY REFINING COMPANY (FORME
CITGO ASPHALT RHFIMNCJ COMPANY
MOBIL OIL CO.
CHEVRON USA INC
AMERADA HESS (PORT READING) CO
COASTAL EAGLE POINT OIL CO.:
NAVAJO REFINING COMPANY
BLOOMFIS.D REFINING COMPANY
GIANT INDUSTRIES ARIZONA INC
PETRO SOURCE REFINING PARTNER
ASHLAND OIL INC
8P EXPLORATION AND OIL INC
BP OIL CORP.
SUN COMPANY INC (fU M)
TOTAL PETROLEUM INC
CYRIL PETROCHEMICAL CORP.
CONOCO INC.
BARRETT REFINING CORP
SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION
SUN COMPANY INC (R I M)
WYNNEWOOD REFINING COMPANY

Production




SaaNotasli*
94,963

75,600
213.400
5.500
424.000
231.500
170.000
9.500
225.000
7,800
255.000

60,000
12,500
305,000
27,600
7.350
100,000
215.000
48.600
6.200
46.200
40.000
181,900
45,600
70,000
230.000
67.100
5,800
295.000
11.000
8.000
23.000
49,500
44,000
7,000
41,450
58,000
215.000
40.000
126.000
80,000
58,000
125,000
57.000
16,600
20.800
•7.000
66,000
161,000
136,000
125.000
68.000
T.SOO
140,000
10.500
54,000
85,000
52.000

TRI Releases

1996- Total Pounds

A*araga 	
SM Natal
484.694

982.439
503,637
30,135
3.073.470
354.727
580,032
*,31»
714,064
7,525
162,503
0
318,817
48.073
2,277,404
62,819
toad
385,318
2.208.232
27.S43
18,326
7BS,*6Z
33.555
581625
102,475
121,138
823.727
295,405
0
3,781.190
4,650
meet
428.600
101,574
210,477
93,530
143,925
34S.KT
2.077,325
2.17
126,033
29,931
215,259
266,077
145.406
96.194
650,155
IrtKl
132,386
243,600
183.275
61,508
359.906
HP
265.645
NP
307,112
402,722
Inact

TRI Transfers

1996 -Total Pounds

Avanoa
SaeNotel
156,801

14,187
142.459
1.015
25.798
97.715
5.542
75.4JS
68,105
0
200,906
6
17.833
21
166.120
0
tract
1,283
606.750
675
0
103,314
0
383,f74
35,643
140,583
325,256
23.600
0
742,408
0
tract
0
16,419
17,458
3.630
3.275
1.333
71,132
40
49,055
18,970
9.345
119.365
9.000
8.874
0
Inact
57.215
97,521
111.172
1 •13,798
26,873
NP
141,455
NP
47,903
7,211
Inad
TRI Releases *
Transfers per
Production Unit

pounds/ production units

«•»«»
SaaNotas US
8.2

1J.2
30
&.r
7.3
ZO
3.4
6.9
35
1,0
1.4
0.0
56
3.9
80
2.3
NC
J.7
13.1
0.6
2.2
18.8
0.8
*.1
30
3,7
5.0
4.8
0.0
15.3
0.4
NC
18.6
2,4
5.2
13-9
36
6.0
10.0
0.0
1.4
06
3.9
3.1
27
6.3
31.3
NC
29
2,1
22
1.6
5.7
NC
2.9
NC
6.6
4.8
NC

TRI Releases -
Carcinogens

1996 - totat Pounds

Avaraga
Saa Natal
24,237

44,103
112.087
2.905
48.806
38.018
31,842
4,596
5,047
824
7,178
0
11,165
12.185
107.022
9.436
Inact
9,040
142,938
5,003
0
6.500
1,261
32.106
2.930
9,296
24.410
44.793
0
72.245
1,250
Inact
0
12,645
22,831
3.630
8,325
21,240
28.576
217
15.109
3,555
516
33,912
13.490
14.755
58,312
Inact
28,133
26,000
10,436
11.182
19.662
HP
17,181
NP
13,739
9,831
Inact
TRI Releases »
Transfers -
Metals

1996 -Total Pounds

Awega
SeaNota 1
24.199

0
51,384
0
15.198
29.799
1,244
0
29,070
O
26.478
«
0
0
73
0
Inact
0
11.953
0
0
0
0
134,672
1.843
9,030
272.484
473
0
704,565
0
Inact
0
0
15,549
«
0
?as
67.688
0
17.255
0
11,610
19.295
0
0
0
Inact
3.871
28,000
93.273
44,690
13,733
NP
53,510
NP
1,662
3,918
Inact

TRI Production -
Related Waste

1996 -Total Pounds

«»rag.
SaaNota 1
15.360.841

20,797,168
14,317.504
29,135
4,643,924
59.732.832
5.800,184
M1S
3.171,730
7,528
1.220.054
fl
1,462.879
49,977
56,948.224
23,7*8
Iract
3,031,770
83.346,496
2*4,912
23,416
3.177,090
129,190
1.259,929
18,760,912
32,834,624
1.356,771
2.658,582
0
16.759.4M
9,810
mast
412.000
203,791
2,395,610
3*2,331
2.245,050
1.624,787
2.203.066
1.099
129.881.984
121,857
296,308
201.248,768
35.279.424
116.533
1,394,185
Inact
387,429
7,970,756
19,081.808
1.597.554
56,742,176
NP
534,791
NP
353,486
782,973
Inact

Potutant Spills last 2 years)

Soil occurranca
Parcaot ol
Facitbas

642%

Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
¥
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N

* ol Soils

A--W
SaaNola6
8.1

6
10
1
1
5
29



1

5

9


t
1
14

1

3
3
2
3
4

14.


5

1
1


2
1
24
1

r
5
i


2
13
1
8


1

2



Anwunt Spiled (t«J


-------
                                      Petroleum Refineries Location Data
                                                    Table A
Data puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated Data lor Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
1S7
138
133
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
1S1
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
168
170
171
172
173
174
NAME
CHEVRON U;S,A: INC. :
W1TCO CORPORATION
PETROWAX PENNSYLVANIA INC
BAYWAY REFINING
SUN COMPANY INC
SUN COMPANY INC (R « M)
PENNZOt PRODUCTS COMPANY
UNITED REFINING INC
PHILLIPS PR CORE INC.
CARIBBEAN PETROLEUM REFINING L
SUN CO INC.
MAPCO PETROLEUM INC.
PRIDE COMPANIES LP
EXXON CORPORATION
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
FINA OIL AND CHEMICAL COMPANY
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY! :
HOWELL HYDROCARBONS & CHEM. IN
CITGO REFINING AND CHEMICALS
COASTAL REFINING 8. MARKETING
KOCH REFINING COMPANY INC
NESTE TRIFINERY PETRO SERVE (F
SOUTHWESTERN:REFININGeo:iNC.
VALERO REFINING COMPANY
DEER PARK REFG ITB PARTNERSHIP
REFINERY HOLDING COMPANY. L.P
LYONDEU-CITGO REFINING CO LLC
PHIBRO ENERGY USA. INC
PETROLITE CORPORATION
SHELL ODESSA REFINING COMPANY
CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM <5ORP
CHEVRON USA INC
FINA OIL AND CHEMICAL COMPANY
STAR ENTERPRISE
AGE REFINING «. MARKETING
SOUTH HAMPTON REFINING CO
DIAMOND SHAMROCK REF MKTG CO
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
PHIBRO SSKSf USA INC!
DIAMOND SHAMROCK REF MKTG CO
LA GLORIA OIL* GAS CO
BIG WEST OIL COMPANY
AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY
CHEVRON USA INC
CRYSEN R£FINWG )NC
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
AMERADA HESS CORP.
SHELL ANACORTES REFINING COMPA
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY
TOSCO REFINING CO.. FERNDALE R
CHEVRON USA INC
SOUND REFINING INC.
U SOU, REFINING CO
MURPHY OIL USA INC
STREET ADDRESS
550.1 INW FRONT AVE 	 ': : ' ': • '
77 N KENDALL AVE

4401 POST RD.
PO BOX 428
3144 PASSYUNK AVENUE
J MAM ST.
P.O. BOX 780
ROAD 710 KM 13 BO.
ROAD 28. KM 2 . LUCHETTI INDUS
ROUTE 901 KM 2 8 (P
PO BOX 2930
ONU.S,277!MI,N,
2800 DECKER DRIVE
END OP BUHT STREET
INTERSTATE 20 HWY E
NORTH SHJE OF PtflLU
1201 SOUTH SHELDON R
LAWRENCE DRIVE
1300 CANTWELL LANE
SUNTIDE AND UP RIVER
6600 UP RIVER ROAD
ttOONUEceSBAYBOUL
5900 UP RIVER ROAD
STATE HWY, 225
6500 TROWBRIDGE
12000 LAWNOALE
9701 MANCHESTER
AT THE INTERSECTION
2700 S. GRANDVIEW
1U RED BLWF ROAD
GULF OIL CORPORATION
PORT ARTHUR REFINERY
NORTH END HOUSTON AV
7811 S. PRESA
FM 418 WEST
FM119 AT FM12M BETW
HWY 35 AND 524 AT OL
FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH
10TH ST SOUTH
LOOP 197 SOUTH B14T
301 LEROY STREET
1702 EAST COMMERCE

474 W SOON
2551 N. 1100W.
2355 S. 1100 Vi.
393 S. BOO W
RT1730MIEOFRT
P.O BOX 127/ESTATE
WEST MARCH POINT ROAO



20555 RICHMOND BEACH
2628 MARINE VIEW DR
3001 MARSHALL AVE
24TH AVE E AND 26TH
CITY
PORTLAND (WltBRIOGE) ! :: •; :
BRADFORD
FARMER'SVALIEY
TRAINER
MARCUS HOOK
PHILADELPHIA
ROUSEVtLLE
WARREN
GUAYAMA
BAYAMON
YABUCOA
MEMPHIS
ABILENE
BAYTOWN
BEAUMONT
BIG SPRING
BORGER
CHANNELVIEW
CORPUS CHRISTI
CORPUS CHRISTI
CORPBSCHRIST1
CORPUS CHRISTI
CORPUS CHRISTI
CORPUS CHRISTI
DEEFPARK
EL PASO
HOUSTON
HOUSTON
K1LGORE
ODESSA
PASADENA
PORT ARTHUR
PORT ARTHUR
PORT ARTHUR/NECHES
SAN ANTONIO
SILSBEE
SUNRAY(MCKEE)
SWEENY
TEXAS CITY
TEXAS CITY
TEXAS CITY
THREE RIVERS
TYLER
BRIGHAM CITY
SALT LAKE CITY
SALT LAKE CITY
WOODS CROSS
WOODS CROSS
YDBKTOWN
ST. CROIX
ANACORTgS
ANACORTES
BLAINE
FERNDALE
RICHMOND BEACH
TACOMA
TACOMA
SUPERIOR
ST
OH
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PR
PR
PR
TN
TX
TX
TX :
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
UT
Ut
UT
UT
UT
VA
VI
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
Wl
EPA
RGN
10
03
03
03
US
03
OS
03
02
02
02
04
06
06
06
06
IX
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
OS
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
OS
06
OB
06
06
08
08
08
oa
08
03
02
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
OS
                                                       65

-------
                                                                                                Petroleum Refineries Data Summary
                                                                                                                  Table B

Oala puled on July 1 3. 1 998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System






Sector Statistics
Row*
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
12?
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
iS7
158
159
160
151
162
163
164
165
tss
16?
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
NAME
CHEVRON U.SA INC.
WITCO CORPORATION
PETROWAX PENNSYLVANIA INC:
BAYWAY REFINING
SUN COMPANY INC
SUN COMPANY INC (R 8, M)
PENNZOIL PRODUCTS COMPANY
UNITED REFINING INC
PHILLIPS PR CORE INC.
CARIBBEAN PETROLEUM REFINING L
SUN CO. WC.
MAPCO PETROLEUM INC
PRIDE COMPANIES LP
EXXON CORPORATION
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
FINA OIL AND CHEMICAL COMPANY
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
HOWELL HYDROCARBONS 1 CHEM IN
CITGO REFINING AND CHEMICALS
COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING
KOCH REFINING COMPANY IMC
NESTE TRIFINERY PETRO SERVE (F
SOUTHWESTERN REFINING CO INC
VALERO REFINING COMPANY
DEER PARK REFG LTD PARTNERSHIP
REFINERY HOLDING COMPANY. L.P.
LYONOELL-CITGO REFINING CO LLC
PHIBRO ENERGY USA INC
PETROLITE CORPORATIDN
SHELL ODESSA REFINING COMPANY
CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORP
CHEVRON USA INC
FINA OIL AMD CHEMICAL COMPANY
STAR ENTERPRISE
ASS REFINING « MARKETING
SOUTH HAMPTON REFINING CO.
DIAMOND SHAMROCK REF WKTC3 CO
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
PHIBRO ENERGY USA INC
DIAMOND SHAMROCK REF MKTG CO
LA GLORIA OIL «. GAS CO
BIG WEST OIL COMPANY
AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY
CHEVRON USA INC
CRYSEN REFINING INC
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
AMERADA HESS CORP
SHELL AN*COfiT£S RERNING COMPA;
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY;
TOSCO REFINING CO.. FERNDALE R
CHEVRON USA INC.
SOUND REFINING INC.
US OIL «, REFINING CO
MURPHY OIL USA INC

nspectJons (2 years)
Air

Total


See Note 1
35

:0
6
4
5
!1
6
3
7
10
3
5
1
1
5
3
3
1
1
5
1
1
1
2
2
1
3
2
3
0
2
3
2
1
2
i
1
2
2
1
3
5
1
1
12
15
15
10
9
3
3
3
2
5
1
NP
NP
1
4
Water

Total

Avafeqe
See Note 1
2.2

0
9
5
4
4
7
5
13
1
1
1
1
NP
2
NP
0
0
1
D
1
1
1
1
1
2
NP
1
3
NP
0
2
3
2
1
1
1
NP






0
D
1
0
0
3
4
5
2
4
3
NP
4
4
0
RCRA

Total

A**rBoa
See Natal
26

0
2
1
1
3
6
1
3
2
3
2
1
0
0
3
1
2
1
10
6
2
3
4
3
1
1
0
1
0
1
2
3
1
3
0
1
9
2
0
1






0
1
5
2
2
2
2
1
0
0
0
0


Total

A>araga
SMNota 1
7.6

0
13
16
10
H
19
9
23
13
7
8
3
1
7
6
4
3
3
15
8
4
5
7
6
4
4
3
7
0
3
7
8
4
6
:4
3
ft
5
2
6
7
9
3
12
16
19
10
10
11
9
to
6
11
5
0
4
5
4
Historical Noncompiance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncomplance
event)


Air

Avaraae
See Note 1
20

0
0
0
8
6
4
0
8
1
0
s
3
0
8
0
1
0
0
1
5
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
3
1
0
8
0
0
S
0
8
0
1
1
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


wataf

**t*x
See Note 1
20

0
2
0
1
0
8
3





0
1
0
1
3
0
3
1
1
0
0
0
.4
0
a
1
0
0
0
0
\
0
a
2
0
1
6
3
3
1
1
a
a
4
0
0
8
8
1
4
2
4
0
2
1
0


RCRA

farm
See Note 1
3.7

0
0
0
0
e
8
0
7
8
e
e
6
8
8
0
t
8
0
8
8
3
2
0
0
5
4
1
8
0
8
8
8
0
8
6
7
8
8
a
0
0
8
1
8
8
8
0
0
8
8
0
4
0
0
0
2
0
0


A W R

A^rege
See Note 1
4.9

0
2
6
8
8
8
3
a
8
e
t
a
a
a
0
a
8
0
a
8
3
2
0
0
7
4
t
t
0
a
a
8
»
a
t
i
t
a
a
3
»
a
2
6
8
a
0
4
8
8
•(
e
2
4
0
3
1
0

Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
• of
polutarts
ovarlrmt

*»»•«»
Saa Not* 1
4.1

0
5
4
9
1
9
3
6
a
14
6
7
NP
0
NP
3
6
0
2
1
2
0
3
2
3
NP
1
6
;NP
0
3
2
1
3
0
2
NP
6
4
6
8
2
2
0
2
2
0
0
2
10
1
3
2
1
NP
0
0
3

• otpoajterts
rajMatW

A»-M.

259

0
16
10
25
26
30
13
16
38
32
33
20
NP
17
NP
20
84
7
22
23
19
0
13
22
22
NP
4
25
NP
0
3
31
24
13
0
11
NP
14
22
17
23
19
a
0
13
13
0
0
14
19
13
14
14
14
NP
6
11
56

«« reports
ovar hmt

A»r«e
See Note 1
11.2

0
20
4
18
5
20
5
20
22
154
13
27
NP
0
NP
16
17
0
3
1
2
0
4
6
10
NP
1
14
NP
0
7
4
2
5
e
3
NP
34
1
15
19
3
9
0
4
3
0
0
3
15
7
6
2
2
NP
0
0
3

*o( reports
subnled

A«w
SaaNotal
874.2

0
499
347
1,020
2,535
1,949
1,161
1,935
1,403
1,219
2.001
1.185
NP
476
NP
533
97J
104
413
630
7«2
0
414
698
961
NP
tti
886
NP
0
207
580
1,276
1,431
0
437
NP
598
431
929
6S8
472
276
0
50
263
0
0
536:
1,110
460
483
479
582
t*>
132
345
1,885

Significant NoncomplBnce Indicator


Air
Percent of
FKlMlfS
SaaNotal
36.3*

N
N
N
Y
y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
¥
Y
y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
NP
N
Y


Water
Percent of
Facil&as
SaaNola 1
61%

N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
NP
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NP
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W>
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
W
N
N
N


RCRA
Percent ol
Faci»es
SaaNota 1
12.3*

N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
y
N
N
N
y
N
y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N


A+W'R

Awerage

0.5

0
0
6
1
!
0
0
1
1
2
6
0
1
1
1
0
2
0
2
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
a
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
2
i
1
0
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
o
0
1

Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years


A
-------
                                                                                      Petroleum Refineries Data Summary
                                                                                                       Table C

Data puled on July 1 3. 1 996 from Negated
Data lor Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System





Sector Statistics
Row*
117
118
119
120
1Z1
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
181
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
NAME
CHEVRON U.S.A: INC,
W1TCO CORPORATION
PETKOWAX PENNSYLVANIA INC.
BAYWAY REFINING
BUN COMPANY WC
SUN COMPANY INC (R * M)
PENNZOfl. PRODUCTS COMPANY
UNITED REFINING INC
PHILLIPS PR CORE IMC.
CARIBBEAN PETROLEUM REFINING L
SUN CO. INC:
MAPCO PETROLEUM INC
PRIDE COMPANEBLP
EXXON CORPORATION
MOBIL OB, CORPORATION
FINA OIL AND CHEMICAL COMPANY
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
HOWELL HYDROCARBONS 4 CHEM IN
CITGO REFINING AND CHEMICALS:
COASTAL REFINING «. MARKETING
KOCH REFINING COMPANY INC
NESTE TRIFINERY PETRO SERVE (F
SOUTHWESTERN REFINING CO INC.
VALERO REFINING COMPANY
DEER PARK REFG LTD PARTNERSHIP
REFINERY HOLDING COMPANY, L P
LYONDELL-CITGO REFINING CO LLC
PHIBRO ENERGY USA INC
PETROUTE CORPORATION
SHELL ODESSA REFINING COMPANY
CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORP
CHEVRON USA INC
FINA OIL AND CHEMICAL COMPANY
STAR ENTERPRISE
AGE REFINING 1 MARKETING
SOUTH HAMPTON REFINING CO.
DIAMOND SHAMROCK REF MKTG CO
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
PHIBRO ENERGY USA tNC
DIAMOND SHAMROCK REF MKTG CO
LA GLORIA OIL 4 GAS CO
BIG WEST OIL COMPANY
AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY
CHEVRON USA INC
CRYSEN REFINING INC
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
AMERADA HESS CORP.
SHELL ANACORTES R6MNINO COMPA
TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING
ATLANTIC RJCHFIE1D COMPANY
TOSCO REFINING CO . FERNDALE R
CHEVRON USA JNC,
SOUND REFINING INC.
US OIL 1 REFINING CO
MURPHY OIL USA INC


Production

Barra&Qay

Avaraga
Saa Notes 144
94.963

18,000
10.000

172.000
175.BQO
315.000
25,000
60.000

45.000
85.000
89.000
4Z758
396.000
315.000
55.000
215,000
1.400
130.000
95.000
255.000
27.000
104.000
106,745
215,400
87.000
265.000
71.000
1.000
28.600
100.000
185,000
175,000
235,000
6,006
2.000
132.000
301.000
433,900
70.000
123,500
75.000
55,000
24.000
44:000
45.000
1*500
25,000
53,000
495,000
106,200
136,000
189,000
95,000
11,900
32,400
33,200


TRI Releases

199C- Total Pounds

A*raoa
SaaNota 1
484.894

65,934
182.320
ssr.ur
1.374
289.359
412.797
«S,69«
218,600
652,652
439.989
tract
49,575
159.WO
1.540.930
3.631,652
703,440
2,350,212
4.149
431.018
1.053.192
29.247
NP
21J.721
241,112
2,481,742
50,064
M8.112
769,843
Inacf.
199.148
57S.972
2.782
268,000
617,024
5,542
9,335
674£75
685,461
5,715,828
200.890
491,029
1,165.718
62,540
43.266
132.421
48.335
1S,t56
50.089
323,848
1.506,131
275,558
126,545
248.177
185,752
2«,,616
NP
81,782
82.676


TRI Transfers

1996 - ToM Pounds

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
156.801

1,618
0
6
93
342.897
263.766
28.103
27,867
14,060
0
hact
167,248
15,095
206,979
35,698
16
S
539,915
447,666
146.652
7.065
NP
4,704
307.958
11,289,080
41,887
6B7.82T
21,495
fnact
3.020
260.060
0
1,444
50
0
755
208
264.553
237,356
356
61,381
979.575
500
2.386
106,2«3
3.185
8.3*0
49,993
432
479,211
17,247
152,296
77,280
0
0
NP
20
1 531
TRI Releases +
Transfers per
Production Unit

pounds/ production units

Av«raga
SaaNotasUS
8.2

3,8
182
ftt
00
3,6
22
37.*
4.1
MC
98
NC
24
4.1
4.4
11.6
128
10,9
3886
6.8
12.6
0,1
NC
21
5.1
63,8
1.1
6.3
11.2
NC
7.1
M
0.0
1,5
2.6
09
5.1
5,1
32
1*6
29
4,5
28.6
1.5
1.9
5.5
1.1
1.9
4.0
SI
40
2:7
21
1,7
20
NC
NC
1,9
2.5

TRI Releases -
Carcinogens

1996 - Total Pounds

Avaraga
SMNota 1
24.237

6,534
320
0
0
22.787
61,599
7,00?
8,850
60,481
32.489
tract
6.205
W.360
93,622
80,12*
93,215
100,921
795
21.362
79,621
6
NP
22,152
9,619
194,358
10,457
58.318
43,866
Fnact
13,400
21,161
5
62,033
4,694
310
500
28.160
62,100
338.004
48,034
26,502
47,787
30,460
5,010
8.918
5,160
630
6,702
18,284
100,137
21.W
5,763
24.003
10,583
2,831
NP
9,120
	 1,762
TRI Releases »
Transfers -
Metals

1996 -Total Pounds

Avaraoa
SaaNota 1
24.199

0
0
«
0
49:264
51,183
0
0
0
0
irad
0
0
245.665
10.127
0
23,953
0
43.189
36,782
0
NP
0
59.064
28,234
0
2,314
967
inad
0
0
17
It
0
0
0
0
271,610
180.439
12
9,3«5
2.066
750
0
0
0
0
0
0
114.881
24,653
0
79;1D2
3.718
0
NP
0
	 0

TRI Production -
Related Waste

1996 - Total Pounds

Awaoa
SaaNotal
15.360.841

67,853
182,320
663,18?
5.482
4.432,028
2,629.350
2.104.872
1,165,600
1 ,341,676
245,243
tract
28,506.160
192.305
2.489.978
tt.S29.176
703,381
2,397,402
543,369
878,168
16,043.872
38.204
NP
369:676
17.044.320
58,662,680
367.289
1,724,178
4,314.644
(nacf
200,644
860,032
111,115
4,401(176
617.117
5,776
7.080
62,2J4iZ72
117.439,872
12.071,272
4.048.894
1,919,336
2,648.296
Z1.324.W2
26,064,608
2,142.936
72,719.296
192.163
325/55
3,291,8K>
12.944.992
1,592,725
5,787,444
3,907.206
5,665,532
2ft,618
NP
61,7«
	 84,225


Pollutant Soils

Slxl Occurrence
Parcant ot
Faciltoas

64.2%

Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
¥
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
¥
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
K
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
tost 2 years!

• of SPH

ftnraga
SeeNotee
8.1

1
1

2
9
1
2

1

1
5

23
1
37
22
1
2
2
25

7
3
52
9
5
14



81
3
5


31
8
6
7
9
16


4
9
3
5
1

Amount SpMad (bs)

A«araga
SaaNota 7
17.392

882
14,700


1.519



3,503

4
2.965

8,971
17
3.213
:1 60,917
420
146
13
16,094

3.839
14,994
188,547
33,560

4.752



51,866

2,275


58.275
6,276
686
1,880
1,006
31,762


4
1,239
7
13,943
350

Surrounding
Population
Residents wthin 3
milas

Av«rag«
SaaNota 1
38.364

82,679
11,874
806
55.669
48.727
100.119
tt.622
12,902



44.956

39,266
33,124
1,760
7,198
35.494
45.913
35,665
4.728
6.433
49,879
6.249
31,054
82,610
66.ru
89,667
11,939
7,982
68,959
7,883
t9,843
8,315
73.500
3.501

1,615
34,489
29,436
25,815
1.554
40,469
25.356
62.980
25,060
42,199
52,756
66,086
4.533
3,191
2.344
1,266
46,92$
39,722
47,971
Note 1: Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2: Average of number of Quarters with a violation or noncompiance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs in wtich faciltles are considered to be In significant noncompf ance (maximum value=3)

Note 5  Tnls iScata !s NOT cZarlS. '.rro«« intT "H"" I* ""'."t T??'.' "^ ^^^^ ******* «**«*««•. P* Mite short tonsAfcy; Pelroleun, Refining: batTels/day, Iron and Steel Mills, short tons/yea,; Nonferrous Metals metric tons/year
Note 5  rrvs indtcatoris NOT companible across industry sectors. Average is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
pioie o. average 01 tnose with at least one spin reported.
Note 7: Average of those with > spil amount reported
NP = no permit/ID* identified; NC = value not calculated; Inad = inactive permit/ID*
                                                                                                                    67

-------
                                      Petroleum Refineries Location Data
                                                     Table A
Dili pulled on July 13.1998 from Integrated Data (or Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
175
176
177
178
•:;:;i«
NAME
QUAKER STATE .CORPORATION
FRONTIER REFINING INC
iittf i.S AMERICA REFINING CO
WYOMING REFINING CO
SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION
STREET ADDRESS
P.O. BOX 336, STATE
2700 EAST 5TH STREET
PQ BOX 510
740 W MAIN STREET
100 SASTUNCOLN HIGHWAY
CITY
NEWEL).
CHEYENNE
EVANSVIUBCASPES
NEWCASTLE
SINCLAIR
ST
WV
WY
WY
WY
WY
EPA
RGN
03
08
08
08
08

-------
                                                                                                 Petroleum Refineries Data Summary
                                                                                                                   Table B
DKa puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
175
176
m
176
179
NAME
QUAKER STAti CORPORATION
FRONTIER REFINING INC
ante AMEWCA aeemmaco:
WYOMING REFINING CO
SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION
Inspections (2 years)
Air
TOM
Avjraga
SaaNotel
3.5
3
7
4
5
3
Water
Total
Avaraga
SaeNotel
22
2
4
NP
1
1
RCRA
Total
Ay.**
SMMe 1
26
24
7
4
2
4
Total
Averaga
SaaNote 1
7.6
29
19
7
9
9
Historical Noncomplance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompNance
event)
Air
Avaraga
SaeNotal
2.0
8
5
8
0
0
Water
Average
See Note 1
20
9
3
a
4
g
RCRA
Averaae
See Note 1
3.7
8
0
1
B
8
A W R
Average
SaaNot«2
49
8
5
8
8
«
Permit Breeedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
*of
polutants
over Nmit
Average
SaaNota t
4.1
s
5
NP
1
0
* of poftjtarts
related
Average
See Note 1
25.9
24
15
NP
12
0
f of reports
OVerlmrt
Average
SaaNotal
11.2
34
7
NP
2
g
* of reports
submHad
Avaraga
SaaNotal
974.2
924
901
HP
105
0
Significant Noncompliance Indicator
*r
Percart ot
Facikbas
SaaNotal
36.3%
Y
Y
N
N
N
Watar
Pareant of
Facilitias
SaaNota 1
61%
Y
N
t»
N
N
RCRA
Pafcant of
Facitbas
SaaNota 1
12.314
N
N
N
N
N
A'W'R
Avaraga
SaaNota3
0.5
2
1
a
0
0
Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years
Air
A>ar>ga
SaaNota 1
1.1
2
3
a
0
0
Watar
A»rao»
SaaNota 1
0.3
0
0
NP
0
a
RCRA
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
0.3
2
0
0
0
0
Total
A*ar«.
SaaNota t
1.6
4
3
0
0
0
Note 1  Average is calctrtted across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2  Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomptance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3  Average number of programs in which facilties are considered to be In significant noncomplance. (maximum vslue=3)
Note 4  This indicator is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector Automobile Assembly: vehidestyear; Pulp Mils: short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note S. This indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors. Average is calculated for etch sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 6: Average of those with al least one spil reported.
Note 7  Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID* identified; NC = value not calculated; Inact = inactive permit/ID.*
                                                                                                                      69

-------
                                                                                       Petroleum Refineries Data Summary
                                                                                                        Table C
Oala puled on July 1 3, 1 998 from Integrated
Data (or Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
175
176
177
178
179
NAME
QUAKER STATE CORPORATION : :
FRONTIER REFINING INC
LITTLE AMERICA REF ININO CO i i i :
WYOMING REFINING CO
SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION ':': :':':.
Production
Banals/Day

SaaNotas 114
94.963
.:.;;;;;;;:;:iijjoo
38,670
: : : J4.SOO
12.555
:::::: :54soo
TRI Releases
1996 -Tow Pounds
Avarega
SaaNota 1
484.894
::::;:::':;:i»'iiB5
171,765
	 • 18*534
94.460
::::::::::: 246.883
TRI Transfers
1996- Tow Pounds
Awaga
SaaNota 1
156,801
500
20,935
7.402
40
0
TRI Releases +
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ production umts
Avaraga
Saa Notes 1* 5
8.2
1S9
5.0
7.8
7.5
4,6
TRI Releases-
Carcinogens
1996 - ToW Pounds
Avwoga
SaaNota 1
24,237
838
21,917
13,706
1.440
T4.Z49
TRI Releases +
Transfers -
Metals
1996 - Total Pounds
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
24.199
750
0
IB
0
0
TRI Production -
Related Waste
1996 - Total Pounds
Avaraga
SeaNota 1
15.360.841
80J.244
1,591,180
806,416
168.484
1.006.139
Pdutant Spills
Soil Occurrence
Pafcant ot
Faciltas

64.2%
V
N
N
Y
¥
last 2 years)
ff of Soils
Averaoa
Saa Notao
8.1
1
1
8
Amount Salad (tjs)
Avaraga
SaaNota7
17.392
167
35
10.890
Surrounding
Population
Rasidants mlhn 3
mtos
Avaraga
SaaNota 1
38.364
19,934
45.322
24.204
2,940
528
Note 1  Average Is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2: Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs In which facllties are considered to be in significant noncomplance. (maximum value=3)
Note 4: This indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector: Automobile Assembly: veNdes/year, Pulp Mils: short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mills: short tons/year; Nonferraus Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5: This Indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors. Average Is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 6 Average of those with at least one soil reported.
Note 7: Average of those with a spll amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID* Identified: NC = value not calculated: Inlet = Inactive permit/ID*

-------
                            Integrated Iron and Steel Mills Location Data
                                                Table A
Data pulled on July 13, 1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NAME
USX CORP
GULF STATES STEEL, INC
NATIONAL STEEL CORP.
ACME STEEL CO.
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP
INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES
LTV STEEL CO INC
USX CORP
AK STEEL CORP
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP
ROUGE STEEL CO.
NATIONAL STEEL CORP
MCLOUTH STEEL
LTV STEEL CO INC.
USS/KOBE STEEL CO.
AK STEEL CORP.
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP
WCt STEEL, INC
YOUNGSTOWN SINTER CO
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORP.
USX CORP
GENEVA STEEL
WEIRTON STEEL CORP,
STREET ADDRESS
5700 VALLEY ROAD
174 SOUTH 26TH ST.
2QTH AND STATE ST8.
13500S. PERRY AVE.
US RTE 12 AND ST. HWY 1
3210WATLINGST
3001 DICKEY ROAD
ONE NORTH BROADWAY
PO BOX 191
5111 N POINT BLVD.
3001 MILLER RD.
NO. 1 QUALITY DR
1491 WEST JEFFERSON
3100 E. 45TH STREET
1807 EAST 28TH ST.
1801 CRAWFORD ST.
MCLtSTER AVE
SOUTH 3RD ST.
1040 PINE AVE. SE
251 DIVISION ST.
701 EAST 3RD ST

13TH ST. ANDBRADDOCKAVE.
1 600 W CENTER
400 THREE SPRINGS DR.
CITY
FAIRRELD
GADSDEN
GRANITE CITY
RIVERDALE
BURNS HARBOR
EAST CHICAGO
EAST CHICAGO
GARY
ASHLAND
SPARROWS POINT
DEARBORN
ECORSE
TRENTON
CLEVELAND
LORAIN
MIDDLETOWN
MINGO JUNCTION
STEUBENVILLE
WARREN
YOUNGSTOWN
BETHLEHEM
BRACKENRIDGE
BRADDOCK
OREM
WBRTON
ST
At
AL
IL
IL
IN
IN
IN
IN
KY
MD
Mt
Ml
Mf
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
PA
PA
PA
UT
WV
EPA
RGN
04
04
05
05
05
05
05
05
04
03
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
03
03
03
08
03
                                                       71

-------
                                                                                            Integrated Iron and Steel Mills Data Summary
                                                                                                                   Table B

Dili puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System






Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
4
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NAME
USXCORP
GULF STATES STEEL, INC.
NATIONAL STEEL CORP.
ACME STEEL CO
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP.
INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES
LTV STEEL CO; INC
USXCORP
AKSTESLCORP.
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP.
ROUGE STEEL CO
NATIONAL STEEL CORP
MCLOUTH STEEL
LTV STEEL CO. INC
USS/KOBE STEEL CO.
AK STEEL CORP
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP
WCI STEEL, INC.
YOUNGSTOWN SINTER CO
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP.
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORP.
USXCORP
GENEVA STEEL
WElRTON STEEL CORP.


Inspections (2 years)
Air

TOM

Avaraoa
SMNota 1
14.3

12
NP
28
6
IS
12
10
18
3
77
4
16
1
0
a
6
1
0
1
NP
6
8
10
50
»
Water

TOM

Avaraga
SaaNota!
48

6
1
5
2
10
9
9
17
7
7
2
17
1
4
2
2
1
2
1
NP
3
3
2
0
2
RCRA

Total

Avaraga
SMNota 1
46

22
17
0
1
4
7
3
8
4
3
0
0
4
4
5
3
0
1
2
0
r
1
1
0
17


Total

Avaraga
SMNotal
21.2

39
18
33
9
29
28
22
43
14
87
6
33
6
g
15
11
3
3
4
0
16
12
«
50
2?
Historical NoncompKance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompiance
event)


Air

Avaraga
SMNote 1
4.4

4
0
8
8
8
1
1
7
0
7
6
8
3
8
2
6
0
0
8
0
6
0
a
3
8


Watar

Avaraga
Saa Not* 1
48

4
8
2
1
8
8
2
a
a
7
5
a
e
8
i
2
4
4
4
0
1
0
5
5
a


RCRA

Avaraga
SMNota 1
5.4

2
4
0
2
9
a
8
8
8
0
0
a
8
a
8
a
8
8
8
0
0
0
6
8
8


A. W. R

Avaraga
SaaNota:
7.2

7
a
e








a
a
a
8
8
8
8
8
0
6
0
a
8
8

Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
• of
pollutants
ovarhmit

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
63

8
15
1
0
4
4
6
9
14
4
3
5
3
6
4
S
5
8
7
NP
4
1
2
8
1?

* ol pouants
ragulotad

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
263

ia
31
17
6
24
47
28
35
40
22
2«
27
17
32
38
51
19
22
19
NP
19
12
14
23
39

* of raports
ovarkrrat

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
37.2

25
171
e
0
25
10
7
28
56
30
E
67
13
40
S
40
25
27
45
NP
23
1
4
26
1?8

t of raports
subrrittad

Avaraga
SMNota 1
2.445.7

1,150
1,533
499
468
1.495
4,415
2,866
5,714
2,»36
2,337
2,221
4,179
2.18$
2,906
2,828
3.509
2,458
2,346
2,944
NP
3.25S
896
975
561
4.181


Significant Noncomoiance Indicator


Air
°arcant ot
Facihtjas
SMNota 1
74.1%

Y
NP
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
¥
Y
N
Y
N
Y
y
Y
¥
NP
Y
N
Y
Y
N


Watar
Parcant of
FaciWas
SMNota 1
40.7%

N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
V
N
Y
Y
Y
NP
N
N
N
Y
Y


RCRA
Parcart of
Faciftas
SMNota 1
25.9%

N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
(4
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
H
N
N
N
N
N
Y


A+W*R

Avaraoa
SMNota 3
1.5

1
2
)
1
2
3
1
2
2
0
i
3
1
1
^
1
2
2
Z
0
1
0
1
2
i


Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years


Air

Avarega
SMNota 1
O.S

0
NP
f
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
NP
S
0
1
4
1


Watar

Avaraga
SMNota 1
0.7

0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
5
1
Q
2
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
NP
0
0
0
0
2


RCRA

Avaraga
Saa Nota 1
05

i
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1


Total

Avaraga
SM Nota 1
2.0

2
0
1
1
Z
1
0
2
8
2
2
5
0
4
0
5
0
0
1
0
$
0
1
4
5
Note 1  Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2  Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncompiance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3  Average number of programs In which faciilies are considered to be In significant noncompiance. (maximum vakje=3)
Note 4  This indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector Automobile Assembly: vehicles/year; Pulp Mils: short Ions/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Sled Mils: short tons/year Nonferrous Metals  metric tons/year
Note 5  This indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. Average Is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 6  Average of those with at least one soil reported.
Note 7  Average of those with a spjl amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID* identified; NC = value not calculated; Inad = inactive permrt/lD*
                                                                                                                     72

-------
                                                                                 Integrated Iron and Steel Mills Data Summary
                                                                                                       Table C

Data puled on Jury 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System




Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
•is
16
1?
18
19
20
21
22
2S
24
25
NAME
USXCOSP
GULF STATES STEEL, INC.
NATIONAL STEEL CORP
ACME STEEL CO
BETHLEHEM STEEUCORP,
INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES
LTV STEEL CO INC
USX CORP
AK STEEL CORP.
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP
ROUGE STEEL CD.
NATIONAL STEEL CORP
MCLOUTH STEEl
LTV STEEL CO. INC
USS/kOBS STEEL CO
AK STEEL CORP.
WHEELlNfrPITTSSURGH STEaCORP
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP
WCI STEEL, INC:
YOUNGSTOWN SINTER CO.
BETHLEH6W STEEL CORP,
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORP.
USX CORP
GENEVA STEEL
WBRtONSTEELCOftP.


Production
Snort Tons/Y aar

Avaraga
Saa Notes 1«4
2.594,167

2,240,000
1,500,000

1,000,000
900,000
900,000
4,100,000
8,730,000
1400,000

3.028,000

1,200,000
2,900.000
2>700.000
2,640,000

2.400.000
1,700,000



2,997,000
1.900,000
1,500,000


TRI Releases
1995- Total Pounds

Avaraga
SaaNote 1
1,300.768

4.41M24
896.530
6,006,140
80.714
1,483.170
246.450
727.110
10.540.528
68.881
1.532,566
57,555
353,970
25.300
843.460
42,510
1.086,212
78410
12.650
545.441
537
162.525
741.665
33,532
1.926.635
295,905


TRI Transfers
1995 - TOM Pounds

Avaraga
SaaNote 1
3,665.330

5,334,666
1,618,700
2549
886,103
8,755,849
2,601,956
163,855
4,301,316
338.900
172,150
17,684,446
14,026.712
16,100
1.232,352
851.723
623,515
469,430
0
5,926.036
0
25.765
8. 172,068
17.506.S96
56
2,916,298
TRI Releases *
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ producbon units

Avaraga
Saa Notes U 5
2.3

3.5
1.7
NC
1.0
11,4
32
0.2
1.7
04
NC
5:9
NC
0,0
0.7
0.3
0.7
NC
0.0
4.0
NC
NC
NC
39
1.0
0.9

TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
1998 - Total Poutts

Avaraga
SaaNote 1
9.561

0
7,505
34,464
0
11.650
420
0
77,805
3,760
0
0
22.155
0
0
0
7.308
0
12,000
0
0
44.705
0
0
16.732
523
TRI Releases *
Transfers -
Metals
1998 - Total Pounds

Avaraga
Saa Note 1
4.098.419

7,453,816
2,378,310
S,77i,S8B
880,690
706,810
2,710,050
7S9,S15
10,284,304
87,261
1.370.711
16.060,504
14.114.960
16,700
2.028.312
895,993
1.419.707
539,840
650
6.445,388
537
15
7.537.600
17,518,520
1,792.489
1.WS.209

TRI Production -
Related Waste
iaae - TOM Pouvfc

Avaraga
SaaNote 1
9.224.912

7.815,540
2.500.270
8,093.088
970.290
17.173.536
2.900.468
888,409
67,367.424
438,190
1,651,600
17,652.560
17,625.808
42.890
2,084,200
1,952,910
3,302,278
549,500
12,650
22,295,096
87,340
2,667,292
15,234,464
23,974,960
9.971,280
3.770,806


PoMant Soils
Soil Occun-anca
Parcantol
Facikbas

66.7%

N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
last 2 years)
«ot Spite

Avaraga
Saa Note 6
7.9


3
€
3
15
1
11
24
i
1
1
29

12

3


12

11
3
1

3
Amou* Splad Cbs)

Avaraoa
SaaNotaT
20.009


150.926

830
18.44S
0
8,169
2,764
260

1.250
34,776

455

5.002


916

8,043
i


. 71.300

Surrounding
Population
mitos

Avaraga
SaaNote 1
56.662

55,645
27,610
39,416
139.459
5.806
13,558
33,308
55,777
38,770
11,711
114,793
53,325
80,767
140,944
81,931
42.400
1640?
31,867
56,216
73,837
86,272
45,514
110,663
78,259
20,405
Note 1  Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Nole 2  Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncompiance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act. dean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs in which fadltles are considered to be In sgnfflcant noncompiance. (maximum value=3)
Note 4: This indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector Automobile Assembly: vehicfcM/year; Pi* Mils: short Ions/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5: This indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors  Average Is calculated for each sector using orty those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 6: Average of those with at least one soil reported.
Note 7: Average of those with a spll amount reported.
NP = no permit/IDf Identified; NC = value not calculated; Inact = inactive permit/IDl>
                                                                                                                    73

-------

-------
                                          Steel Minimills Location Data
                                                     Table A
Data puled on July 13, 1996 from Integrated Data (or Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
: :: '1
2
t
4
5
e
7
8
'.:•:•:•:•:»
10
•;•«
12
:'.:::H
14
..: :i5
16
17
18
«
20
21
22
'•':23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
}1
32
:33
34
&
36
37
38
••"'••'•&
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
•'iff
48
;: ,:49
50
-: si
52
S3
54
;-;;S5
56
•St
58
NAME
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP.
STRUCTURAL METALS, INC
NUCOR-YAMATO STEEL CO.
MACSTEEL
NUCOR STEEL ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS STEEL ASSOCIATES
NORTH STAR STEEL CO
TAMCO
CF*I STEEL L.P,
ciTISTEEL USA, INC.
FLORIDA STEEL CORP.
FLORIDA STEEL CORP
ATLANTIC STEEL: INDUSTRIES: INC
PSCO STEEL INC.
NORTH STAR STEEL IOWA
LACLEDE STEEL CO.
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP,
A. FINKL 1 SONS CO.
CALUMET STEEL CO
AUSTEEL LEMONT CO.. INC
KEYSTONE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRI
NORTHWESTERN STEEL AND WIRE CO
NUCOR STEEL, CRAWFORDSVILLE M
SLATER STEELS CORP.
HAYNES INTERNATIONAL. INC.
KENTUCKY ELECTRIC STEEL. INC
GALLATW STEEL
NS GROUP INC.
GREEN RIVER STEEL CORP.
BAYOU STEEL CORP.
AVESTA SH6FWELD EAST INC
J*L SPECIALTY STEEL, INC
MACSTEEL
NORTH STAR STEEL CO
NORTH STAR STEEL CO-
GS TECHNOLOGIES CORP
BIRMINGHAM SOUTHEAST, LLC
FLORIDA STEEL CORP.
Nt*»rS<«<
CO-STEEL RARITAN
NEW JERSEY STEEL CORP
AUBURN STEEL CO.. INC
AL TECH SPECIALTY STEEL CORP
CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORP.
WORLD METALS, INC.
TIMKEN CO.. THE
WORTHINGTOtt INDUSTRIES INC
ARMCOINC.
MARION STEEL CO
CHAMPION STEEL CO., THE
COPPERWELO STEEL CO.
NORTH STAR STEEL CO.
SHEFFIELD: STEEL CORP.!
CASCADE STEEL ROLLING MILLS, 1
OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC
UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PR
STANDARD STEEL
ARMCO INC.
STREET ADDRESS
2301 f- L.:SHUTTLESWORTH DR;
101 S. 50TH ST.
5928 E STATE HIGHWAY 18
4700 PLANTERS RD,
7301 EAST COUNTY RD. 14Z
2803 VAN DYKE RD.
3000 HIGHWAY 66 SOUTH
12459 ARROW HIGHWAY
2100SFREEWAY
4001 PHILADELPHIA PIKE
HWY, 21 r, YELLOW WATER RD
7105E. 6THAVE.
384 OLD GRASSDALE W}.. NE
2011 7THAVE.
GREEN Rp. AND HIGHWAY 38
BROADWAY AND CUT STS.
972 EAST 4500 NORTH RD.
2011 N. SOUTHPORT AVE
« FEAST -NTH ST
NEW AVE AT CECO RD., PO BOX 2
7000 S.W. ADAMS ST.
121 WALLACE ST.
RR#2, BOX 311 [400 EAST, 400 S
2400 TAYLOR ST. WEST
2000 W DEFFENBAUGH
US60WATCOALTON
RT 42 AGNIELS CREEK
LICKING PIKE 4 QUEEN CITY AVE
*7m :U;S,:HIGHWAY 80 EAST
356 HIGHWAY 628
7700 ROLLING MltLftQ
330 SOUTH LIVERNOIS AVE.
3100 BROOKLYN RD,
3000 EAST FRONT ST.
MM RED SOCK RD:
7000 ROBERTS ST.
FOURTH ST., OFF FLOWOOD DR.
6601 LAKEVIEW RD.
291 1 E. NUCOR ROAD
225 ELM ST.
NORTH GROSSMAN RD.
PO BOX 2008. QUARRY ROAD
WH.LOWBROOKAVS
PO BOX 977
182 BEAVER ST.
1835 OUEBER AVE SW.
2J11 PARSONS AVE.
913 BOWMAN ST
912CH6NEYAVE,
8247 PENNIMAN RD.
4000 MAHONING AVE
2669 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BL
2300 SO. HWY, 97
3200 NORTH HIGHWAY 99W
1-4400 N RIVERSAT6 BLVD
600 MAYER ST
SOON, WALNUT ST,
101 THREE DEGREE RD.
CITY
BIRMINGHAM
BIRMINGHAM
BLYTHEViag
FORT SMITH
HICKMAN
NEWPORT
KINQMAN
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PUEBLO
CLAYMONT
BALDWIN
TAMPA
CWTERSV8.LE
CAMANCHE
WH.TON
ALTON
BOUBONNAIS
CHICAGO
CHICAGO HEIGHTS
LEMONT
PEOR1A
STERLING
CRAWFORDSVILLE
FORT WAYNE
KOKOMO
ASHLAND
(SHEMT
WILDER
OWENSBORO
LAPLACE
BALTIMORE
DETROIT
JACKSON
MONROE
ST. PAUL
KANSAS CITY
JACKSON
CHARLOTTE
NORFOLK
PERTH AMBOY
SAYREVH.LE
AUBURN
DUNKIRK
SYRACUSE
AKRON
CANTON
COLUWWS
MANSFIELD
MARION
ORWELL
WARREN
YOUNGSTOWN
SAND SPRINGS
MCMINNVILLE
PORTLAND
BRIDGEVILLE
8URNHAM
BUTLER
ST
AL
AL
AR
AR
AR
AR
AZ
CA
CO
DE
FL
FL
GA
A
IA
L
L
L
IL
IL
L
L
IN
N
IN
KY
K¥
KY
KY
LA
MD
Ml
Ml
Ml
MN
MO
MS
NC
NE
NJ
NJ
NY
NY
NY
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OK
OR
O«
PA
PA
PA
EPA
RGN
04
04
06
06
OE
06
09
09
08
03
04
04
0+
07
or
05
OS
05
05
05
05
05
OS
OS
OS
04
04
0.
04;
06
0,
05
05
05
OS
07
0*
04
07
02
02
02
02
02
05
05
OS
05
OS
05
OS
05
06
10
10
03
OS
03
                                                         75

-------
                                                                                                      Steel Minim ills Data  Summary
                                                                                                                    Table B

Data pulled on July 1 3. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System






Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
g
9
10
11
12
1S
14
15
16
17
18
18
20
21
22
2i
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
NAME
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP;
STRUCTURAL METALS. INC.
NUCOR-YAMATQ STEEL CO.
MACSTEEL
NUCOR STEEL ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS STEEL ASSOCIATES
NORTH STAR STEEL CO.
TAMCO
CF4I STEEL L.P.
CITISTEEL USA, INC.
RORIQASTEEiCORP,
FLORIDA STEEL CORP.
ATLANTIC STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC
IPSCO STEEL INC.
NORTH STAR STEEL IOWA
LACLEDE STEEL CO.
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP:
A FINKL I SONS CO
CALUMET STEEL CO
AUSTEEL LEMONT CO , INC
KEYSTONE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRI
NORTHWESTERN STEEL AND WIRE CO
NUCOR STEEL, CRAWfOHDSVILLE W
SLATER STEELS CORP
HAYNEB INTERNATIONAL; INE
KENTUCKY ELECTRIC STEEL. INC
GAtLATIN STEEL
NS GROUP INC
GREEN RIVER STEEL CORP.
BAYOU STEEL CORP.
AVESt A SHEFFIELD CAST INC
J»L SPECIALTY STEEL. INC
MACSTEEL
NORTH STAR STEEL CO.
NORTH STAR STEEL CO.
GS TECHNOLOGIES CORP
BIRMINGHAM SOUTHEAST. LLC
FLORIDA STEEL CORP
Nucor Steel
CO-STEEL RARITAN
NEW JERSEY STEEl CORP.
AUBURN STEEL CO., INC.
AL TECH SPECIALTY STEEL CORP.
CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORP.
WORLD METALS, INC.
TIMKEN CO.. THE
WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES. INC.
ARMCO INC.
MARION STEEL CD.
CHAMPION STEEL CO.. THE
COPPERWELO STEEL CO
NORTH STAR STEEL CO.
SHEFFIELD STEEL CORP.
CASCADE STEEL ROLLING MILLS. 1
OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC
UNIVERSAL STAINLESS « ALLOY PR
STANDARD STEEL
ARMCO INC.

'nspedions (2 years)
Air

TOM

Average
See Note!
30

2
0
2
1
2
2
4
2
2
9
1
NP
3
1
D
3
4
3
2
6
3
3
4
3
NP
2
3
2
1
4
11
NP
1
2
0
2
NP
2
a
2
2
1
1
2
NP
1
1
6
2
NP
4
0
3
2
2
NP
3
4
Water

Total

Average
See Mole 1
1.6

1
2
0
1
1
1
NP
NP
0
9
0
0
NP
1
1
2
2
0
NP
2
4
8
2
NP
2
3
3
9
2
2
8
NP
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NP
NP
3
NP
3
0
2
0
NP
2
0
NP
0
0
2
3
3

RCRA



Averw
See Note!
1.6

5
7
1
0
0
0
1
0
4
0
0
0
0
1
0
7
1
0
1
0
7
7
2
4
8
3
2
6
4
0
5
0
1
0
4
0
1
1
2
0
1
0
2
4
:NP
1
0
1
1
NP
2
1
2
0
1
1
0
1


Total

Average
See Note!
5.7

9
9
3
2
3
3
5
2
6
17
1
0
3
3
•f
12
7
3
3
8
14
18
a
7
10
8
8
17
7
6
26
0
3
2
4
2
1
3
5
2
3
1
3
9
NP
5
1
9
3
NP
8
1
5
2
3
3
g
8
Historical Noncompiance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompliance
event)


Air

Average
See Not. !
1.4

4
0
0
0
0
5
7
0
0
0
0
0
a
1
0
1
5
2
0
8
0
8
4
0
0
0

-------
                                                                                         Steel Minim ills Data Summary
                                                                                                       Table C

Data pulled on Jury 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System





Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
9
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
97
58
NAME
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP.
STRUCTURAL METALS. INC
NUCOR-YAMATO STEEL CO
MACSTEEL
NUCOR STEEL ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS STEEL ASSOCIATES
NORTH STAR STEEL CO.
TAMCO
CF»I STEEL L.P.
CITISTEEL USA. INC.
FLORIDA STEEL CORP
FLORIDA STEEL CORP
ATLANTIC STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC
IPSCO STEEL INC.
NORTH STAR STEEL IOWA
LACLEDE STEEL CO
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP.
A FINKL 4 SONS CO.
CALUMET STEEL CO.
AUSTEEL LEMONT CO.. INC.
KEYSTONE CONSOLIDATED INOUSTRI
NORTHWESTERN STEEL AND WIRE CO
NUCOR STEEL. CRAvVFOROSVILLE IN
SLATER STEELS CORP.
HAYNES. INTERNATIONAL. INC.
KENTUCKY ELECTRIC STEEL. INC
GAUATIN STEEL
NS GROUP INC
GREEN RIVER STEEL CORP.
BAYOU STEEL CORP.
AVESTA SHEFFIELD EAST INC
J»L SPECIALTY STEEL. INC.
MACSTEEL
NORTH STAR STEEL CO
NORTH:STAR STEEL co,
GS TECHNOLOGIES CORP
BIRMINGHAM SOUTHEAST, LLC
FLORIDA STEEL CORP
Nucor Steel
CO-STEEL RARITAN
NEW JERSEY ETE& CORP.
AUBURN STEEL CO . INC.
AL TECH SPECIALTY STEEL CORP.
CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORP
WORLD METALS. INC,
TIMKEN CO.. THE
WORTHInKJTON INDUSTRIES, rNC
ARMCOINC
MARION STEEL CO
CHAMPION STEEL CO , THE
COPPERWELD STEEL CO
NORTH STAR STEEL CO.
SHEFFIELD STEEL CORP,
CASCADE STEEL ROLLING MILLS. I
OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC!
UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PR
STANDARD STEEL
ARMCO INC


Production

Snort Tons/Year

Average
See Notes la 4
621.699

500.000
550.000
2,200.000
345.000
3,000,000
220.000
500
440.000
1.000.000
400.000
500,000

850,000
1,350.000
350.006
1,000,000
886,000

150,000
300,000
850,000
2,400.000
1500.006
75.000

300,000
1,200.00?
700.000
140,000
800.000
200.006
400,000
215,000
600,000
700,000
1,000.000
400,000
340.000
580.006
900.000
650,000
450,000
60,000
10,500
1.500,000
720.000
390.000
2.190
550,000
700,000
450,000
150.000
232,000


TRI Releases

1996 -Tow Pounds

Average
Sea Note 1
488.116

240.037
6,049
30.584
37,235
Imd
89,130
NP
5,390
112,669
32,324
19.122
Inact
21,303
NP
26,629
23,886
7.711
10,552
2,249
1,473,631
1,705,417
14,484,216
11.256
16,310
NK(
9,635
30,318
10.998
15.200
22.004
5,287
20.088
176.949
19,759
35,229
165.500
8.410
43.300
2,Bu5
28.395
Intel
4.900
26,588
13.918
NP
12,633
26,874
43,397
33,503
0
63.000
27.400
24.949
2.648
18,071
755
67,997
15678392


TRI Transfers

1996- Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
3.762.923

4.7E3.632
3.936.400
16.726,664
9.355.968

2.077.461
NP
4.738,732
6.519.404
2.668,690
7.753,448
Inact
8,208,300
NP
3.604,914
418.564
4:593.420
15,306
550,755
1.421,489
5,184.140
144,800
17.488.368
1.416.860
(met
1.508.211
9.573,000
1,880.600
387,011
4.964,708
564,452
7,633,748
1;715,507
4.975.164
4,270,276
8.668,400
2,259,010
3.389.392
7.679,144
8,090.788
tact
2,788.764
682,032
633.116
NP
5.065,700
388,086
3,898,572
2.918.250
0
2.935,900
2,576,860
3,958,826
5.389,092
4,266,260
15.590
890.800
49.994
TRI Releases *
Translers per
Production Unit

pounds/ production ixtfs

Average
See Notes 14 5
7.9

10,0
7.2
76
272
:NC
99
NC
108
6,6
66
156
NC
7.3
NC
14.4
04
5,2
NC
37
9.7
10.8
6.1
11.7
19.1
NC
5.1
6.0
2.7
2.9
62
2.9
19.1
8.9
8.3
62
8.8
5.7
10.1
13-2
9.0
NC
62
120
NC
NC
34
NC
5.5
7,9
00
NC
NC
7.2
7.7
9.5
0.1
4.1
NC

TRI Releases -
Carcinogens

1996 - Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
999

0
0
0
0
tract
0
NP
0
0
0
0
Inact
0
NP
0
0
0
107
0
0
0
160
0
0
toad
0
0
8
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
rrwcf
0
7,620
1,782
NP
66
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
112
0
0
0
TRI Releases +
Transfers -
Metals

1 996 -Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
3,937.353

5.003.658
3.942,448
16.757,448
9,374,608
Inact
1,948.162
tit>
4.744.120
6:586.07!
2.701.014
7,772,568
Inact
8,229,600
NP
3,631,542
378,006
4.601.128
25,447
553,004
2.895,120
8.867,528
14.576,160
17,440,566
1.191,610
Inad
1.517,846
8.803,312
1.890.190
399,956
4.986.712
257.066
4.910,516
1.692.455
4,994,924
4,305,282
8.833.896
2,287,450
3,432.692
7681.952
8,114,584
Inact
2 793 664
526:231
533.242
NP
4,979.676
6
3,848,276
2.868.904
0
2,998,900
2.604.260
3480,350
5.391,740
4,266,736
15,625
958.737
	 413,503

TRI Production -
Related Waste

1996- Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
4.902.864

:5;,On3:,68B
3,945,536
S.J41.328
11.862,208
Imd
2.166,536
NP
4,744.328
6.5SZ.500
2,701.014
4,054.530
Inact
8,171.532
NP
3,631,532
817.626
4.601,128
132.807
552,464
1,473.131
16,717,152
14,876,656
17.594792
1.431,860
feMCf
1.517,214
9,603,280
1,891,331
1,790.200
4.986.712
10,469, 400
8,233,644
1.828,509
4,995,312
4,298,852
8.835.144
2,287.414
3.432.720
2,577
8,119,180
Intel
2793648
i4«l730
1.910,772
NP
5,964.000
482,511
5,143,300
2.946,222
o
2*9*,T20
2,604,264
3,992.634
5,463,476
4,274,348
585,172
954.900
45.679.040


Poljtant Spills

Spl Occurrence
Percent ol
FaaMes

16.5%

N
N
N
N
N
N
¥
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
¥
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
M
::Z:z:Z:ZZ Z 2 Z
last 2 years)

folSpIs

Average
See Note 6
2.1







1

1
1











2





1


1


1
2








4



Amount Soried (6s)

Average
See Note 7
5.375







30.004

1.760
75

















50





150









0



Surrounding
Population
Residents mtnin
3mles

Average
See Note 1
39,103

65.339
80,007

16.024
20.824
4.124
0
26309
50.610
59,524
4,691
31.433
17,580
7,130
2,612
38,125
43.560
480,226
63.060
31.032
22,463
22.359
1542
79.170
46.963
30.564

99.058
7,248
11.861
119,523
73,621
18.344
16,568
43.O07
57,079
31.889
8,926
5,818
83,891
74.314

2SJ.86
76,883
73437
70.462
49^143
38.653
2 437
34S30
58,659
21,453
18.177
9,350
64,630
14.859
Note 1. Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2: Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncompliance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act Clean Water Act or RCR A)
Note 3: Average number of programs in which facilities are considered to be in significant noncompSance (maximum value=3)

N£ £ TOs IS!! NOT cZ££ a'cZ ir^f T* T """' "^T?i°',' "T "*°mM>° *"""* vehictes/year; Pulp M«s: short Ions/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mi»s: short tons*..,; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 6  Average o('most,^0, iTkEM^m \™  ^                 " "          '    SeCtW USIn9 Onty thOSe °bse'v"i°n* "^ "°^"° values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 7  Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP = no permil/IO* identified; NC = value not calculated; Inact = inactive permit/ID*
                                                                                                                    77

-------
                                          Steel Minim ills Location Data
                                                     Table A
Data puled on July 13.1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
7S
76
77
78
79
60
»1
82
83
84
85
86
87
00
es
90
91
NAME
IWENSStESL.ASUBOFUJKENS,
FIRSTMISS STEEL. INC.
NATIONAL FORGE CO
BAR TECHNOLOGIES. INC
NS GROUP INC.
LATROBE STEEL COMPANY
STANtJARtJ STEEL
TELEDYNEALLVAC
ELUWOOO QUALITY STEELS CO.
EDGEWATER CORP.
EL£CTRAaOY(AG.O CARLSON IN
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP
PENNSYLVAN W BIEEl TEGHNOLOGIE
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORP.
WASHINGTON StEeLCOHP
STRUCTURAL METALS. INC.
NUCOR STEEL
GEORGETOWN STEEL CORP.
AMERISTEEL
FLORIDA STEEL CORP.
NORTH STARSTEEL :
BORDER STEEL MILLS. INC.
NucorSIeBl
LONE STAR STEEL CO.
LETOURNEAU, INC. STEEL GROUP
CHAPARRAL STEEL CO
IRIINTEHNATIONAL
STRUCTURAL METALS, INC.
NUCOR STEEL- DtVOF NUCOR COR
RGANOKE ELbUTKIU S 1 bbL COKK
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP
CHARTER MANUFACTURING CO
STEEt OF WEST VIRGINIA, INC.
STREET ADDRESS
ARC BUILDING.: MODEMA RD.
RTE. 601 S.
100 FRONT ST
227 FRANKLIN STREET. SUITE 300

2626 LIGONIER ST.
107(3eRTRUpE$r
PA ROUTE 981 NORTH
700 MORAVIA ST.
300 COLLEGE AVE.
21 SENECA ST.
101 W. BERN ST.

500 GREEN ST.
WOODLANQ ANP GRIFFITH
PO BOX 2005
300 STEEL MILL ROAD, P.O. BOX
SOUTH HAZARD ST.
US-4SN
1919 TENNESSEE AVE.
OLD HWY 90, PO BOX 2390
IH-10ANDVINTONRD.
PO BOX 125. US HWY 7S SOUTH
HWY 259 E 3 MILES
2400 MCARTHUR DR
300 WARD RD
PO BOX 1101
STEEL MILL RD.. PO BOX 91 1
PO BOX 100. W CEMETERY ROAD
102 WESTSIDE BLVD. N.W.
2424 S W ANOOVSR
1658 COLD SPRING DR.
2NDAVEANDirTHST.
CITY
COATESVILLE
HOLLSOPPLE
IRVINE
JOHNSTOWN
W»>PEL
LATROBE
tATROee
LATROBE
NEWCASTLE
OAKMONT
OILCITV
READING
STEELTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
CAYCE
DARLINGTON
GEORGETOWN
JACKSON
KNOXVILLE
BEAUMONT
EL PASO
J6WETT
LONE STAR
LONGVIEW
MIDLOTHIAN
PAMPA
SEGUIN
PLYMOUTH
ROANOKE
SEATTLE
SAUKVILLE
HUNTINGTON
ST
PA:
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
SC
SC
SC
TN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
UT
VA
WA
Wl
Wtf
EPA
RGN
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
OS
03
oi
03
0}
03
OS
04
04
04
04
04
06
06
06
06
OS
06
OS
06
08
03
«
05
03

-------
                                                                                                    Steel Minimills Data Summary
                                                                                                                  Table B

Dala pulled on July 13. 1996 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System






Sector Statistics
Row*
59
60
81
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
89
70
71
72
71
74
75
76
77
78
79
90
61
B2
83
S4
85
86
»7
88
69
90
91
NAME
LUKENS STEEL. A SUB OF LUKENS;
FIRSTMISS STEEL, INC.
NATIONAL FORGE CO
BAR TECHNOLOGIES. INC
NS GROUP INC.
LATROBE STEEL COMPANY
STANDARD STEEL
TELEDYNEALLVAC
ELLWOOD QUAirnr STEELS CO.
EDGEWATER CORP.
EtECTRALLOYIAGO CARLSON IN
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP
PENNSYLVANIA ST66L TgCHNOLOGtE
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORP.
WASHINGTON STEEL CORP
STRUCTURAL METALS. INC
NUCOR STEEL
GEORGETOWN STEEL CORP
AMERfSTEEL
FLORIDA STEEL CORP
NORTH STAR STEEL CO,
BORDER STEEL MILLS. INC
Nucor Steel
LONE STAR STEEL CO
IETOURNEAU. INC. STEEL GROUP
CHAPARRAL STEEL CO
tRI INTERNATIONAL
STRUCTURAL METALS, INC.
NUCOR STEEL • DTV OF NUCOR COR
ROANOKE ELECTRIC STEEL CORP
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP.
CHARTER MANUFACTURING CO
STEEL OF WEST VIRGINIA. INC:


Inspections (2 years)
Air

Total

Average
See Note 1
30

1
1
1
NP
T
5
2
4
3
3
3
9
5
1
2
2
Z
3
0
0
2
3
2
1
0
2
0
1
4
9
8
4
Water

Tow

Avecaoe
See Note 1
1.6

2
0
3
0
0
1
0
1
3
2
0
2
4
4
2
0
0
4
NP
1
:1
NP
NP
1
0
NP
NP
0
0
2
0
NP
RCRA

Total

Average
Sa«Not« 1
1.8

1
1
2
2
J
5
0
1
3
0
0
2
4
0
0
3
2
2
6
2
4
2
2
3
5
3
0
0
1
1
0
1
WV 38.4269 0


Total

Average
See Note 1
5.7

4
2
6
2
9
11
2
6
9
5
3
13
13
5
4
5
4
9
6
3
7
5
4
5
5
5
0
1
5
12
6
5
2
Historical NoocompHance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompSance
event)


Air

Average
See Note 1
1.4

0
0
0
0
8
4
0
2
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
8
5
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
a
i
NP


Water

Average
SaaNota 1
2.3

7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
8
0
3
0
a
2
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
e
0
0
0
NP


RCRA

Average
SaaNota 1
23

0
0
0
2
0
6
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
a
o
0
0
3
6
8
8
0
6
0
2
0
0
a
0
0
8
NP


A. W R

Average
SaaNota}
4.3

7
0
0
2
t
8
0
2
Z
0
0
0
4
2
0
8
8
6
3
8
8
8
0
8
0
2
0
1
8
0
0
8
1

Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
* 0)
poftjtants
over himt

Average
SaaNolal
32

3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
0
0
6
NP
2
2
NP
NP
4
0
NP
NP
0
2
1
0
NP
0

a ot poejtarts
regulated

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
13.4

19
0
D
0
U
0
0
0
0
0

-------
                                                                                          Steel Minimills Data Summary
                                                                                                       Table C

Data puled on July 13. 1 998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System





Sector Statistics
Row*
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
71
73
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
.91
NAME
UIKENS STEEL. A SUB OF IUKENS. :
FIRSTMISS STEEL. INC.
NATIONAL FORGE CO
BAR TECHNOLOGIES. INC
NS GROUP INC.
LATROBE STEEL COMPANY
STANDARD STEEL
TELEDYNE AUVAC
ELLWOOD QUALITY STEELS CO:
EDGEWATER CORP
ELECTRALLOY (A G 0- CARLSON IN
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP
PENNSYLVANIA STEEL TECHNOLOGIE
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORP.
WASHINGTON STEEL CORP
STRUCTURAL METALS, INC.
NUCOR STEEL
GEORGETOWN STEEL CORP
AMERISTEEL
FLORIDA STEEL CORP.
NORTH STAR STEEL CO.
BORDER STEEL MILLS. INC
Nucor Sleet
LONE STAR STEEL CO
LETOURNEAU. INC STEEL GROUP
CHAPARRAL STEEL CO.
IRI INTERNATIONAL
STRUCTURAL METALS, INC.
NUCOR STEEt - »V Of NUCOR COR
ROANOKE ELECTRIC STEEL CORP
BIRMINGHAM STEEL CORP.
CHARTER MANUFACTURING CO
STEELOFWEST VIRGINIA. INC.


Production

Snort-Tons/Yaar


SM Notas U 4
621,699

: ::: :: 150.000-
270,000
100.000
1,500.000
400,000

58.000

300.000
41.600

200,000
1,200,000

200,000

550.000
850.000
475.000
365.000
900,000:
270.000
600.000
500.000
100,000
1.500,000

775.000
930,000
650.000
740.000-
300.000
N


TRI Releases

1996 -Total Pounds

Avarega
SaaNota 1
488,116

;• ;--:':;r:W5,W9
11.381
432,456
NP
9.990
85.083
9,827
411,132
49t
87
21,248
2.379,670
4,015
15.080
S6.W9
2.508
114,722
44.711
2?,s$7
56.825
135,953
11,981
535,547
147.100
51.677
15.842
36,433
2.285
22.674
4,040
Inact
16.160
a


TRI Transfers

1996 - Total Pounds

Avarage
SaaNola 1
3.762.923

V:V:'"::»;»j,«6.
425.083
165,414
NP
2,902,488
764,599
4-16.460
324,314
131v935
779
28r,86?
3.665.266
972,000
10.045.856
1.062,652
2.490.098
7368,476
9,678.296
5,303,896
2,249,782
5,683,484
2.887.828
7.730,808
2.560.390
120.454
12,028.848
0
6,381,664
8,178,916
2.320.312
h*cf
1,759.930
0
TRI Releases *
Transfers per
Production Unit

pounds/ production units

Avaraga
SM Notes 1« S
7.9

•:::;::';:;::::;:::;::11*
16
60
NC
7,0
NC
r.4
NC
0,4
0.0
NC
30.2
08
NC
5.8
NC
13.6
11.4
112
63
65
107
148
5.4
1.9
8.0
NC
82
67
3.6
NC
5.9
0

TRI Releases -
Carcinogens

1996 - Total Pounds

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
999

•::::-::::::-:::-:::0
0
1,905
NP
0
0
a
50.668
17
75
0
18.069
0
0
&
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
750
47
0
0
0
16
Inact
500
350.000
TRI Releases •>
Transfers -
Metals

1996 -Tot* Pounds

Avaraoa
SaaNota t
3.937.353

7.8B5396
436,464
165,909
NP
1808,724
127,320
426,26?
490.346
127.928
190
308.002
3.682,658
978,015
9.760,624
546.666
2,492.596
7.450.948
9.723,008
5,331,780
2.306,606
5,819,436
2,899,808
8,243.336
2,577.930
H5.S37
12.037,088
36,433
6,383,948
6,201,464
2,288.318
Inact
1.748.150
969:322

TRI Production -
Related Waste

1996 > Total Pounds

Awaga
SaaNota 1
4.902,864

:: : :*;740,0*a
433.080
59/.S10
NP
3,622.998
838.783
426,300
947,880
132,426
850
380,881
14.428.552
972.000
10,479.264
2,561,580
2,871,522
7,452,568
9.900,208
5J31,780
2,305.818
5,819.438
2.899,812
?.r«*796
2.799,000
836,419
12,045,192
36,429
6,436.996
7,994,?44
2.324,352
lhaef
1.775.012
M


Potutant Soils

Spil Occuranca
parcart or
Facikhas

165%

•:;;;:-:;;;;;;r:*
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
0
last 2 years)

* of Spits

Avaraga
SaaNotaG
2.1

:.:•:••;:••::• " t






1



4

2









1







1
0


Amount Spdaddjs]

AWW
SaaNota?
5,375

-:::;;::r:;:m»M






500



26,662

148









3.068







200
0

Surrounding
Population
Rastdants Mthin
3milas

Awaraga
SaaNota 1
39.103

::-;:::25;?ra
4.409
2.61S
56,254
15,787
20,593
20,601
21.063
36.771
44,711
14,904
107,526
63,693
35,358
33,602
37.210
1220
10.871
?,788
76,839
39,108
10.988
•(,12?
903
7.400
3,717

3,411

64,932
76,554
9,071
21,950
Note 1: Average Is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2: Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs In which fadlties are considered to be In significant noncomplance. (maximum value=3)
Note 4: This indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors The units apply only to a sector Automobile Assembly: veNdes/yean Pulp MIN: short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short Ions/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tonsjyear
Note 5 This Inricator Is MOT comparable across Industry sectors. Average Is calculated for each sector using orry those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 6: Average of those with at least one soil reported
Note 7: Average of those with a soil amount reported
NP - no permit/ion identified: NC = value not calculated: Inact = Inactive permit/ID*

-------
                           Primary Aluminum Refineries Location Data
                                             Table A
Data pulled on July 13, 1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
• 11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
NAME
ALUMINUM CO, OF AMERICA
NSA - DIVISION OF SOUTHWIRE CO
ALCAN ALUMINUM CORP.
ALUMAX INC (EASTALCO)
NORANDA ALUMINUM INC.
COLUMBIA FALLS ALUMINUM CO.
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
REYNOLDS METALS CO,
ORMET CORP
NORTHWEST ALUMINUM CORP.
REYNOLDS METALS CO
ALUMAX INC
ALUMINUM CO OF AMERICA
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
ALUMAX INC (INTALCO)
GQLDENDALE ALUMINUM COMPANY
REYNOLDS METALS CO
KAISER ALUMINUM - MEAD WORKS
KAISER ALUMINUM - TACOMA WORKS
VANALCO INC.
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
RAVENSWOOD ALUMINUM CORP.
STREET ADDRESS
WARRICK OPERATfONSST
1627 STATE ROUTE 271 NORTH
HIGHWAY 2096
5601 MANOR WOODS RD
STJUOE INDUSTRIAL P
2000 ALUMINUM DR.
HWY 740
PARK AVE. EAST
S GRASS RIVER R0.PO
43840 ST RT 7
3313 W 2ND ST
5000 NE SUN DIAL RD.
HWY 52 4 176
300 N HALL RD.
FM 1786 5MSWOF ROC
4050 MOUNTAIN VW. RD
85 JOHN DAY DAM RD.
4029 INDUSTRIAL WAY
E2111 HAWTHORNE RD.
3400 TAYLOR WAY
5701 NW LOWER FflVEf? ROAD
6200 MALAGA HWY.
PO BOX 98 WJLLOW GRJ
CITY
NEWBURGH
HAWESVILLE
HENDERSON
FREDERICK
NSW MADRID
COLUMBIA FALLS
BADIN
MASSENA
MASS6NA
ORMET
THE DALLES
TROUTDALE
GOOSE CRE6K
ALCOA
ROCKDALE
FERNDALE, BELLINGHAM
GOLDENDALE
LONGVIEW
MEAD (SPOKANE)
TACOMA
VANCOUVER
MALAGA
RAVENSWOOD
ST
IN
KY
KY
MD
MO
MT
NC
NY
NY
OH
OR
OR
$e
TN
TX
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WV
EPA
RGN
05
04
04
03
or
08
04
02
02
05
10
10
04
04
06
10
to
10
10
10
tO
10
03
                                                     81

-------
                                                                                           Primary Aluminum Refineries Data Summary
                                                                                                                  Table B

Data puled on Jury 13, 1998 from Integrated
Data (of Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System






Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1i
16
: 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
NAME
ALUMINUM CO. Of AMERICA
NSA - DIVISION OF SOUTHWIRE CO
ALCAN ALUMINUM CORP.
ALUMAX INC (EASTALCO)
NORANDA ALUMINUM INC.
COLUMBIA FALLS ALUMINUM CO
ALUMINUM CO OF AMERICA
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
REYNOLDS METALS CO.
ORMET CORP
NORTHWEST ALUMINUM CORP
REYNOLDS METALS CO
ALUMAX INC
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
ALUMAX INC (INTALCO)
GO.D6NDALE ALUMINUM COMPANY
REYNOLDS METALS CO.
KAISER ALUMINUM. MEAD WORKS
KAISER ALUMINUM - TACOMA WORKS
VANALCO INC,
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
RAVENSWOOD ALUMINUM CORP.


Inspections (2 years)
Air

TOW

Awfaoa
SMNOU1
2.4

4
3
3
3
2
2
4
3
2
2
3
2
1
1
:1
1
3
3
1
3
2
1
6
Water

ToW

Avaraga
SaeNolal
36

9
2
2
7
1
0
4
£
t
4
3
1
2
3
1
4
6
4
4
4
4
3
i 	 I
RCRA

ToW

Avaraga
SaaNola 1
21

7
4
B
0
t
2
S
2
2
2
1
1
4
0
1
0
2
2
a
2
0
0
2


Total

Avaraga
SaeNota 1
8.1

26
9
13
10
4
4
11
11
11
8
r
4
r
4
3
5
11
9
J
9
6
4
	 1«
Historical Noncomplance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompiance
event)


Air

Avaraga
SaaNotal
1.0

4
0
0
0
3
1
0
2
0
6
0
0
0
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


wot*

Avaraga
SeaNota!
2.3

1
6
0
0
Q
0
0
8
8
6
0
1
0
2
0
4
2
5
1
4
0
3
1


RCRA

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
2.0

1
0
8
0
0
2
1
0
1
5
8
0
1
8
a
0
«
0
0
3
0
0
a


A, W. R

Averaga
SaaNota 2
4.3

6
6
8
0
3
3
1
8
8
8
*
1
1
8
1
4
2
5
1
6
0
3
a

Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2

• of
poMarts
ovwtmi!

Avaraga
SaaNole 1
4.5

6
11
1
3
7
6
3
)3
 amount reported.
NP * no permMD* identified: NC = value not calculated: Inact = Inactive permit/ID*

-------
                                                                                Primary Aluminum Refineries Data Summary
                                                                                                       Table C

Dale puled on July 13, 1998 from Integrated
Data (of Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System





Sector Statistics
Row*
t
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1f
12
13
14
13
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
NAME
ALUMINUM CO Of AMERICA
NSA - DIVISION OF SOUTHWIRE CO
ALCAN ALUMINUM CORP.
ALUMAX INC (EASTALCO)
NORANDA ALUMINUM INC
COLUMBIA FALLS ALUMINUM CO
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA
ALUMINUM CO OF AMERICA
REYNOLDS METALS CO.
ORMET CORP
NORTHWEST ALUMINUM CORP.
REYNOLDS METALS CO
ALUMAX INC.
ALUMINUM CO OF AMERICA
ALUMINUM CO OF AMERICA
ALUMAX INC. (INTALCO)
GOLD6NOALE ALUMtNUM COMPANY
REYNOLDS METALS CO
KAISER ALUMINUM - MEAD WORKS
KAISER ALUMINUM - TACOMA WORKS
VANAICOINC.
ALUMINUM CO OF AMERICA
RAVENSWOOO ALUMINUM CORP,


Production

Metric Tons/Year

Km*
SM Notes li 4
182.696

300,000
186,000
186.000
174,000
215,000
168,000
119,000
125,000
123,000
256,000
42.900
121,000
205.000
210,000
315,000
272.000
168,000
204,000
200.000
73,000
11S.OOO
220,000
168.000


TRI Releases

1996- Total Pounds

Averaoe
See Note 1
668,666

2.296.64S
507.627
88,620
400.270
718.814
275.656
175,878
756,123
159,670
358,000
549,250
293
1.166.340
1.003.881
1,909,875
487.207
120.5*8
249,904
1,254,505
305,389
1.049,255
660.781
677,747


TRI Transfers

1996 - Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
371.608

1,374,73*
39,954
0
250
27,007
250
2,826
706
10.10*
0
302,497
3,750
1.711,484
2,422,552
33,050
2,920
0
991,339
962,361
122,000
17.39S
21,076
496,720
TRI Releases +
Transfers per
Production Unit

pounds/ production trvts

Average
SM Notes 14 5
5.5

t2.J
29
0.5
23
3.5
1.6
1.6
6.1
3.0
14
<04
0.0
14.0
163
62
1.8
a.?
6.1
11.1
59
9.Z
3.1
7.0

TRI Releases -
Carcinogens

1996 - Total Pouids

Average
SaaNota 1
20.590

A300
0
0
0
104.208
20.128
3,264
3.033
300,250
0
0
0
2,058
1,225
2,830
0
s
22.874
1.25O
5,072
0
3,657
409
TRI Releases *
Transfers-
Metals

1996- Tola! Pounds

Average
See Note 1
146,987

741.S74
2,204
0
0
160
0
2,085
6,678
10,100
0
0
3.762
0
944.017
18,565
13
0
18,572
362,881
120,871
17,«51
1.651
489.409

TRI Production -
Related Waste

1996 - TOW Pounds

Average
SaaNotal
7.216.273

S*,flT7,440
3,345,896
15,784,616
670,000
5.748,784
10.160.688
3,293,858
9,800.392
527.500
4,296,000
1.013.075
52,962
2.879,450
18.949.008
12.676,696
6.017,768
5,tt3,fJOft
3,844.624
2.280.490
601,310
5.868,000
13.669.168
3.257.530


Polutant Soils

Soil Occurrence
Parcanl of
Facikbas

56.5%

Y
N
¥
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
ast 2 years)

< ol Sols

Avaraoa
SaeNot«6
1.6

4

i


1
1
3
J
1



3
1

1


1

1
1

Aim** Spilad (bs)

Average
See Note 7
8,015

3.75«

126


1,500


*,?58
417



5,785
625

3J


30

65,000
6,136

Surrounding
Population
Residents Mtftn
3>nles

Average
SMNote 1
10,337

17.152
8.988
1.20B
2,585
706
2,920
t,871
11,579
11.579
1,392
10,885
22.744
20,735
22.309

1.040

30.452
32,566
30,786
M73.
754
1.060
Note 1  Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2 Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act. Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3 Average number of programs In which (sallies are considered to be In sigrificant noncompiance. (maximum value=3)
Note 4 This indcator is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply onry to a sector: Automobile Assembly: vehidesyyear; Pulp Mils: short tons/day: Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Sled Mils: short tons/year; Norrferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5 This indicator is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. Average Is calculated fof each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 6 Average of those with at least one soil reported.
Note 7 Average of tnose with I spil amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID* identified. NC = value not calculated: Inact = inactive permit/ID*
                                                                                                                    83

-------

-------
                                 Primary Copper Refineries Location Data
                                                  Table A
Data pulled on July 13,1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
NAME
CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS CO.
CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS CO.
ARIMETCO
CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS CO.
ASARCO INC.
ARIMETCO INTERNATIONAL INC.
CYPRUS CUMAX METALS CO.
MAGMA COPPER CO.
CHEMETCO (CONCORDE METALS)
RECONTEK INC.
NORTH CHICAGO SMELT. &REF.
ESSEX GROUP
COPPER RANGE CO.
WARRENTON REFINING CO
PHELPS DODGE CORP.
ARIMETCO
FRANKLIN SMELTING & REFINING
ASARCO INC.
ASARCO INC.
PHELPS DODGE CORP.
KENNECOTT
STREET ADDRESS



INSPIRATION RD.
640 ASARCO AVE.

800 EPIMA MINE RD.
STATE HIGHWAY 76


2028 S SHERIDAN RD.


COUNTRY ROAD M
W1NSLOW RL. SUP

CASTOR AVE., EAST
PO BOX 30200
2301 W PAISANO DRIVE
NORTH LOOP RD.

CITY
BAGDAD
CASA GRANDE
EMERALD ISLE
GLOBE (MIAMI)
HAYDEN
JOHNSON CAMP
SAHUARtTA
SAN MANUEL
ALTON
NEWMAN
NORTH CHICAGO
COLUMBIA CITY
WHITE PINE
WARRENTON/TRUESDALE
HILDALGO/PLAYAS
YERRINGTON
PHttADELPHIA
AMARILLO
EL PASO
EL PASO
MAGNA
ST
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
IL
IL
IL
IN
Ml
MO
NM
NV
PA
TX
TX
TX
UT
EPA
RGN
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
OS
05
05
05
05
07
06
09
03
06
OS
06
08
                                                     85

-------
                                                                                             Primary Copper Refineries Data Summary
                                                                                                                  Table B

Data puled on July 13, 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System






Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
6
e
7
a
s
10
(1
12
13
14
15
16
1?
18
19
20
, 21
NAME
CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS CO.
CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS CO
ARIMETCO ;••;•••
CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS CO
ASARCOINC,: •;.
ARIMETCO INTERNATIONAL INC
CYPRUS CLIMAX METAiS CO
MAGMA COPPER CO
CHEMETCO (CONCOftoe MSTAiS)
RECONTEK INC.
NORTH CHICAGO SMELT: i REF:
ESSEX GROUP
COPPER RANGE CO.
WARRENTON REFINING CO
PHELPS DODGE CORP.
ARIMETCO
FRANKLIN SMELTING 1 REFINING
ASARCO INC.
ASARCOINC.
PHELPS DODGE CORP
KENNECOTT :


nspections (2 years)
Air

Total

Av-raga
SaaNola 1
35

1
NP
NP
2
3
NP
NP
3
NP
NP
1
0
1
2
1
1
13
1
2
1
:.::: :W
Water

ToW

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
0.8

0
0
NP
1
0
0
NP
0
0
0
1
0
6
0
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
2

RCRA

ToW


SaaNola 1
2.6

0
NP
NP
0
0
NP
0
1
18
6
2
0
2
0
0
NP
NP
E
:
1
•::::::::0


Total

Avaraga
SaaNotal
5.3

1
0
NP
3
3
0
0
4
ii
6
4
0
10
2
1
1
13
7
7
2
•;:!.. ;.1»
Historical Noncomplance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncomplance
event)


Atr

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
0.5

2
0
NP
1
0
0
0
4
4
0
0
0
fl
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0


Watar

AvaTBga
SaaNote!
1.9

0
0
NP
0
0
0
0
0
I
8
2
0
8
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
8


RCRA

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
3.0

1)
0
NP
1
0
0







0
a
0
0
0
1
5
;:;;;;:;;:;»


A. W, R

Avaraga
SaaNota2
4.0

2
0
NP
2
0
0
a
8
a
a
a
a
8
5
o
0
2
0
2
6
I;;;-:;;;,;::;,;?

Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act (2
year data)
«or
poMarts
ovarlml

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
52

0
0
NP
0
0
0
NP
0
S
6
2
0
3
0
NP
NP
Mf>
NP
NP
NP
:::::;:«

• olpoffjtants
ratMatad

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
17.1

13
0
NP
13
0
0
NP
0
18
25
11
0
14
0
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
:::.::!::28

aofraports
ovarkmrt

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
164

0
0
NP
0
0;
0
NP
0
9
8
B
0
13
0
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
:::::,:•««

f of raports
submttad

Avaraga
SaaNota 1
1.077.4

1,820
0
NP
1,794
0
0
NP
0
338
598
649
0
430
0
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
• ian


Significant Noncompience Indicator


Air
Parcanto!
Facittas
SaaNota 1
14.3*

Y
NP
NP
N
N
NP
NP
Y
NP
NP
N
N
N
N
N
N
V
N
N
N
;;i;;,;,;H


Watar
Parcant o(
FacitDas
SaaNota 1
48%

N
N
NP
N
N
N
NP
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
N


RCRA
Parcart ot
Faciltjas
SaaNota 1
14.3%

ti
NP
NP
N
N
NP
N
Y
y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
NP
NP
N
N
N
::;;;:;;;N


A*W*R

Avaraga
SaaNota3
0.3

1
0
a
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
a
0
i
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
••••••••• 	 :0


Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years


Air

Avaraga
SaaNotal
0.3

0
NP
NP
0
0
NP
NP
0
NP
NP
D
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
:.-:•:-:: 
-------
                                                                                 Primary Copper Refineries Data Summary
                                                                                                     Table C

Data puled on July 13. 199a from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System





Sector Statistics
Rowt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
19
20
21
NAME
CYPRUS CLIMAX MSTALS CO
CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS CO
ARIMETCO
CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS CO
ASARCO INC,
ARIMETCO INTERNATIONAL INC
CYPRUS CUMAX METALS CO.
MAGMA COPPER CO
CHEMETCO (CONCORDE METALS)
RECONTEK INC
NORTH CHICAGO SMELT: 1 R6F.
ESSEX GROUP
COPPER RANGE CO,
WARRENTON REFINING CO
PHELPS DODGE CORP.
ARIMETCO
FRANKLIN SMELTING 1 REFINING
ASARCO INC
ASARCO INC.
PHELPS DODGE CORP.
KENNECOTT


Production

Metnc Tons/Yaw

Average
SM Notes 14 4
173.850

14,000
45.000

425.000
238,000
5.000
16,000
688.000
115,006
1.000
1.000
18.000
68:000
32.000
220,000
11,000
16.000
450,000
115,000
415.000
	 564.000


TRI Releases

1996- Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
4,431,311

NP
NP
NP
25,936,416
10.311.976
NP
NP
5.649.276
93,089
106
45.260
20.425
fnact
16,168
10,004,160
NP
27,300
447.280
223,636
1,532
9.360,288


TRI Transfers

1996 - Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
4,859.486

Nf>
NP
W
2,152,660
38.393.98*
NP
HP
10.228,760
6
0
10W2S
1,606.369
Inad
1.051.503
0
NP
0
652.470
13.068.360
6.155
772.300
TRI Releases +
Transfers per
Production Unit

pounds/ production ur»ts

Average
SeeNoles 145
53.3

NC
NC
NC
659
204.6
NC
NC
231
0.7
0.1
145.3
904
NO
334
455
NC
1.7
24
115.6
0.0
18,0

TRI Releases -
Carcinogens

1996 -Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
534

NF-
NP
te>
0
0
NP
NP
0
0
0
0
0
Met
0
0
NP
750
6,060
417
0
250
TRI Releases +
Transfers -
Metals

1996 - Total Pounds

Average
See Note 1
9,222,572

NF-
NP
NP
27,740.048
48,577.*24
NP
NP
15,875.640
93.089
106
145,305
1.626.794
Intel
1,067,691
9,655,01$
NP
26.550
1.050.085
13.24J.8S6
6,937
10.007,024

TRI Production -
Related Waste

1996 - Total Pounds

Average
SMNotel
56.167.294

NF-
NP
NP
509.613.566
103.580.8S4
NP
NP
81.886,528
91.78$
2.646
173,025
28,259,264
load
1,070,273
10,004,180
NP
13,882,5(50
2,209,610
20;035;r92
7,687
9.484,360


Pollutant Soils

Spil Occurrence
Percert of
Facihtjes

238%

Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
	 N
ast2years)

1 of SPINS

Average
See Note 6
44

J


7



5







1

6




Amourt Spied (ts)

Average
See Note 7
33.224

4704


76,955



13,376







67,000

86




Surrounding
Population
Residents within
3 mites

Average
See Note 1
39,466




3,832
1.587
1.587

4.009
4,968

64,117
1,756
900
5.194


240,043
1.396
42,071
103,744

Note 1  Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2. Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event in any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3  Avenge number of programs in which facilties are considered to be in significant noncomplance. (maximum vakje=3)
Note 4  This indicator is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply only to a sector Automobile Assembly: vehicles/year; Pulp Mils: short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mils short tons/yean Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5  This indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors Average is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfer!
Note 6: Average of those with at least one soil reported.
Note 7  Average of those with a soil amount reported.
NP = no permiulDK identified; NC = value not cafculaled; Inact «Inactive permit/ID*
                                                                                                                  87

-------

-------
                                  Primary Lead Refineries Location Data
                                                  Table A
Data pulled on July 13, 1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
1
2
3
4
NAME
ASARCO INCORPORATED
THE DOE RUN CO.
ASARCO INCORPORATED
ASARCO INCORPORATED
STREET ADDRESS
HWY.49S
881 MAIN ST.
E. OF HELENA-SEC. 36 R
500 DOUGLAS ST.
CITY
GLOVER
HERCULANEUM
EAST HELENA
OMAHA
ST
MO
MO
MT
NE
EPA
RGN
07
07
08
07
                                                     89

-------
                                                                                                Primary Lead Refineries  Data Summary
                                                                                                                  Table B
Data puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data tor Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
NAME
ASARCO INCORPORATED
THE DOE RUN CO.
ASARCO INCORPORATED
ASARCO INCORPORATED
Inspections (2 years
Air
ToM
Avorogo
Soo Hotel
25

3
2
2
3
Water
TOW
Avongo
Soo Note 1
0.8

2
0
1
0
RCRA
TOM
Avongo
SooNolol
1.3

3
0
2
0
Total
Avongo
So* Natal
4.5

8
2
5
3
Historical Noncompiance (Quarterly Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompliance
event)
Mr
Avongo
SooNolol
1.3

0
0
5
0
WXor
Avongo
Soo Hotel
0.3

1
0
0
0
ROW
Avorogo
SooNolol
1.3

0
0
s
0
A.W, R
Avorogo
So«Holo2
2.3

1
0
8
0
Permit Exceedances - Clean Water Act
(2-year data)
• or
poUortl
ovorlml
Avmo.
SooNolol
3.0

6
1
2
0
•of
poMMI
roguloted
Avongo
Soo Hotel
17.8

:13
10
29
19
• orropoHi
ovorln*
Avongo
Soo Halo 1
4.7

11
1
2
0
• ofroportl
submitted
Avongo
SooNolol
347.8

353
34
475
529
Significant Noncompiance Indicator
Ak
Porcorilor
SooNolol
0.0%

N
N
N
N
Woter
PorcortoT
Focnm
SooNolo 1
0.0%

N
N
N
N
RCRA
PonoMoT
F«Mlt>
SooNolol
0.0%

N
N
N1
N

Awngo
SooNolol
0.0

0
0
0
0
Enforcement Actions Taken - 2 Years
Air
Avongo
SooNolol
0.3

1
0
6
0
Wolor
Avongo
SooNotol
0.3

0
0
1
0
RCRA
Avongo
Soo Noto 1
0.0

0
0
0
0
TOM
Avongo
SooNolo 1
0.5

1
0
1
0
Note 1 Average Is calculated across il entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2 Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3 Average runber of programs In which fadlfles are considered to be In significant noncomplance. (maximum vakie-3)
Note 4: This Indicator Is NOT comparable across Industry sectors  The units apply only to a sector: Automobile Assembly: vehicles/year: Pulp Mils: short tons/day: Petroleum Refining: barrels/day: Iron and Steel Mils: short tons/year Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5: This Indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors  Average Is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values (or BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 6: Average of those with at least one soil reported.
Note 7: Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP - no permit/ICW identified; NC = value not calculated: Inact - Inactive permWID*
                                                                                                                    90

-------
                                                                                    Primary Lead Refineries Data Summary
                                                                                                       Table C
Data puled on July 13, 199B from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row*
1
2
3
4
NAME
ASARCO INCORPORATED
THE DOE RUN CO.
ASARCO INCORPORATED
ASARCO INCORPORATED
Production
Motile Tom/Toor
Avngt
StoNotosll.4
126.305

112.000
229.221
: 82.000
82,000
TRI Releases
1 996 -TOM Pounds
Avorago
SOONOIOI
15,323,960

8,886.646
7.880,312
44;47u:1l2
58,848
TRI Transfers
IMS - TOM Pounds
Avorago
SOONolot
1,468,785

•: 	 : :, :-:::0
997
: 	 557:861
5,316,460
TRI Releases +
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ production unls
Avorago
SOONOIOI1AS
182,1

:::: : 	 79*
34,4
::::;:::: : 549;i
65.6
TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
inc. - Total Pounds
Avoraga
SooNolol
5,570

::• 	 22.278
0
:::::::.: : (j
0
TRI Releases +
Transfers -
Metals
19W - Total Pounds
Avoraga
SooNolat
16,780.879

: :: ::S;864,388
7.881.048
: : 45,di1jtt2
5.366.388
TRI Production -
Related Waste
19M- Tom Pounds
Avoraga
SaaNotal
55.315,356

76.221,066
40.213.248
84,604,768
20.218,352
Potjlant Spils
SpffJ Occurronca
Portontof
FsdtHis

50.0%

:N
Y
N
Y
last 2 years)
• at Spits
Avorago
SooNotoC
2.0

3
1
Amount SpHUd (Hi)
Avor«go
So«Noli7
4.042

4.042
Surrounding
Population
RtsMonls wthlfl
3m«os
Avorago
SooNolol
27,331

622
13,972
S.32S
89,403
Note 1  Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater
Note 2  Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event in any of Die three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs In which tadttes are considered to be in significant noncompiance. (maximum vakje=3)
Note 4  This indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors The units apply only to a sector. Automobile Assembly: vehicles/year; Pulp Mils short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: bairels/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/yeai
Note 5  This Indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors Average is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers
Note 6  Average of those with at least one spil reported.
Note 7  Average of Ihose with a spil amount reported
NP = no permit/1 DO identified: NC = value not calculated: Inact = Inactive permit/ID*
                                                                                                                    91

-------

-------
                                   Primary Zinc Refineries Location Data
                                                   Table A
Data pulled on July 13,1998 from Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Row*
: :1
2
3
NAME
BIG RIVER ZINC CORP.
ZINC CORPORATION OF AMERICA
SAVAGE ZINC INC.
STREET ADDRESS
ROUTE 3C, MONSANTO AVE.
300 FRANKFORT ROAD
ZINC PtANT RD., BOX 1t04
CITY
SAUGET
MONACA
CLARKSVILLE
ST
IL
PA
TN
EPA
RGN
05
03
04
                                                      93

-------
                                                                                               Primary Zinc  Refineries Data Summary
                                                                                                                  Table B

Data puled on July 1 3. 1 998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System






Sector Statistics
Row* NAME
i HG RIVER ZINC CORP.
2 ZINC CORPORATION OF AMERICA
3 SAVAGE BNC INC.


Inspections (2 years)
Air

Total

Average
See Note 1
23

i
3
1
Water

Total

Average
SeeNote!
2.5

NP
3
2
RCRA

Total

Average
SeeNotel
20

2
4
0


Total

Averege
See Note 1
6.0

5
10
3
Historical NoncompHance (Quarterty Periods
with 1 or more violation or noncompHance
event)


Air

Average
See Note 1
2.3


-------
                                                                                    Primary Lead Refineries Data Summary
                                                                                                       Table C
Data puled on July 13. 1998 from Integrated
Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) System
Sector Statistics
Row* NAME
1 BIG RIVER ZINC COUP.
2 ZINC CORPORATION OF AMERICA
3 SAVAGE ZINC INC
Production
Metnc Tons/Year
Average
See Notes 144
109.333
82.000
146,000
100.000
TRI Releases
1996- ToW Pouids
Average
See Note 1
357.580
229,494
485,666
Inact
TRI Transfers
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
SM Natal
12.206.203
•U14.390
23,094,016
Inact
TRt Releases +
Transfers per
Production Unit
pounds/ production units
Average
See Notts 14 S
90.2
1S.S
161.5
NC
TRI Releases -
Carcinogens
1996 - Total Pounds
Average
SMNott 1
0
«
0
mid
TRI Releases +
Transfers -
Metals
1996 -Tot* Pounds
Avecege
SeeNolel
12.501.552
1.4*5,424
23,579,680
Ired
TRI Production -
Related Waste
1996 -ToM Pounds
Average
See Note 1
12.467.261
1356,106
23,578,416
Ihut
Pokjlant Spills
Soil Occurrence
Percent of
Faciktaes

33.3%
N
Y
N
ast 2 years)
« 01 Soils
Average
See Note 6
1.0
1
Amount Spiled (IK)
Average
See Note T
2.000
2.000
Surrounding
Population
Residents ntthin
Average
S*eNote 1
31.309
64.87*
21,028
B.024
Note 1: Average is calculated across al entries with value of 0 or greater.
Note 2: Average of number of quarters with a violation or noncomplance event In any of the three programs (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act or RCRA)
Note 3: Average number of programs in which fadlttes are considered to be in significant noncomplance. (maximum vatue=3)
Note 4: This indicator is NOT comparable across Industry sectors. The units apply onty to a sector: Automobile Assembly: veNdes/year Pulp Mils: short tons/day; Petroleum Refining: barrels/day; Iron and Steel Mils: short tons/year; Nonferrous Metals: metric tons/year
Note 5: This indicator is NOT comparable across industry sectors. Average is calculated for each sector using only those observations with nonzero values for BOTH production and TRI Release and Transfers.
Note 6  Average of those with it least one spil reported.
Note 7. Average of those with a spil amount reported.
NP = no permit/ID*4 identified; NC = value not calculated; Inact = inactive permit/IDK
                                                                                                                    95

-------

-------
                                     Appendix A
                          HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF SFIP

The Sector Facility Indexing Project arose from the need to examine environmental records and
trends within industry categories. Before beginning SFIP, EPA examined the current status of
facility-level data available to the Agency. This analysis demonstrated a strong need for
improved data integration techniques to allow quick and easy access to important facility
information. Several new analytical methodologies were put in place for EPA's Office of
Compliance Sector Notebook Project (September 1995).   Several more improvements are now
made through SFIP, and EPA is planning to follow-up on many issues that have been identified
through this effort. Resolution of these issues will allow EPA to reach its goal of developing a
method to provide detailed facility and sector-based environmental data that is easily accessible
to the public. Step-by-step, EPA is developing better ways to compile this information so that
environmental protection choices can be made based upon the best possible data. Recent efforts
to increase public access and improve data quality are detailed in the four phases presented
below.

Phase  1 - Data Released Under Sector Notebook Project

As a first step, EPA published consolidated compliance, enforcement and chemical release
information for eighteen industrial sectors under the Sector Notebook Project. After two external
review periods, this information was made available publicly in September 1995. Now covering
28 industries, the Sector Notebooks provide aggregate data by sector regarding the

•  type and amount of Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) chemicals released and transferred;
•  compliance and enforcement history;
•  applicable regulations;
•  industrial processes descriptions, and technological innovations; and
•  industry statistics.

To accurately move from providing aggregate data to facility-level data, extensive research,  data
cleansing and quality assurance were necessary. This was  done under Phase 2.
Phase 2 - Issuance of Interim 1996 Progress Report for Five Test Sectors

The second step in addressing the issues mentioned above was captured within the October 1996
Interim Progress Report. The 1996 Report focused primarily on presentation of baseline
information at the facility-level for five test sectors: petroleum refining; iron and steel; primary
nonferrous metals smelting and refining; pulp manufacturers; and automobile assembly. The
1996 Report contained facility-level statistics for most of the same indicators as are being used
now.  Since that time, several indicators have been revised and others added. The elements EPA
has determined to be important when examining the environmental records of facilities include:

                                          A-l

-------
       compliance and inspection history,
       TRI chemical information,
       on-site pollutant spills,
       demographic and geographic data indicating population surrounding each facility, and
       facility production or production capacity.
Phase 3 - Public Comment and Data Quality Review

Following the internal review of the 1996 Interim Progress Report, EPA began the process of
soliciting input on the project as a whole and the quality of the data being used in SFIP. For
example, the plans, goals and scope for SFIP were-published in an April 14, 1997 Federal
Register Notice.  Soon after, a public meeting was held on May 14, 1997 to obtain input from
industry, state officials, environmental organizations and other interested groups and individuals.
The meeting was followed by a 30-day written comment period. (See Appendix D for a
summary.) Since that time, EPA has continued its discussions regarding the development of
SFIP, the use and utility of particular indicators and the methods of public access.  In response to
comments concerning data quality, EPA provided each affected facility with a copy of its
individual environmental records the Agency proposed to include in SFIP.  While this data
quality review was voluntary and participation was solely the decision of the individual facilities,
approximately 62% chose to submit comments.  During this unparalleled effort, EPA reviewed
all comments received,  even those that were submitted after the deadline. A system was put in
place to ensure that all data comments were addressed by EPA in conjunction with the
appropriate state agency.  Based upon these comments, EPA and the states modified the data as
appropriate.
Phase 4 - SFIP Reports and Tools for Public Access

The data provided in this Report is a consolidation of very detailed information that goes well
beyond what can be presented in a paper report format. Therefore, EPA has designed a
searchable Internet Website to assist interested users in examining the more detailed information
regarding each facility and to conduct simple analyses of facilities within each sector. The SFIP
Website may also be useful as a tracking system to give EPA, state/local governments, the
regulated community, and the public the ability to monitor the environmental records of each
facility over time. In addition, the SFIP Website allows EPA to collect comments on the utility
and perception of SFIP, as well as any comments regarding problems users may have with this
means of public access to EPA data.

The SFIP Website address is:
                          http://www.epa.gov/oeca/sfi.                          |
                                          A-2

-------
                                     Appendix B
                          FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the Sector Facility Indexing Project?
The Sector Facility Indexing Project (SFIP), a pilot program developed by EPA, integrates and
provides public access to more environmental information than has ever before been available to
the public in one location.  SFIP profiles approximately 650 facilities in five industrial sectors.

What are the goals of SFIP?
Goals of SFIP include the following:
>  to make environmental information about industrial facilities and regulatory compliance
   more accessible to the public.
*  to expand the comprehensiveness and improve the accuracy of data for analyzing the
   environmental track record of an industrial sector.
*•  to provide industrial  and government stakeholders with better analytical tools for permitting,
   reporting, compliance, benchmarking, self-policing, and pollution prevention purposes.
>  to help all stakeholders take a more holistic, multi-media approach  to environmentally sound
   performance.

What industries are included in SFIP?
Five industrial "sectors" were chosen for the pilot stage of SFIP. They  are:
>  automobile assembly
»•  pulp manufacturing
>•  petroleum refining
>  iron and steel production
>•  primary smelting and refining of aluminum, copper, lead, and zinc  (nonferrous metals)

How were these industries chosen?
Five criteria were used to select the industries for the pilot phase of SFIP:
1. Be a manufacturing industry—defined as having a primary Standard Industry Classification
   (SIC) Code that falls within codes 20 through 39. (For example, the iron and  steel sector is
   categorized under SIC Code 33—Primary Metal Industries.)
2. Have fewer than 1,000 facilities, so that the size of the pilot project would be manageable.
3. Release relatively high levels of chemicals, because this ensures sufficient data for the pilot
   project, and because  facilities with greater chemical releases potentfally have a more
   significant environmental impact.
4. Use similar processes and products within an industry sector, to facilitate comparisons
   between facilities.
5. Have sources of data available for facilities in the sector, to enable SFIP to accurately
   identify all facilities and gather all the relevant environmental data for each facility.
                                          B-l

-------
What are the key elements of SFIP?
For each facility, SFIP provides information on its location, production or production capacity,
surrounding population, permits held under major environmental programs, the number of
inspections received, its record of compliance with federal regulations, and any chemical
releases, transfers, and spills.  Original facility-specific reports are available in SFIP for viewing
and downloading. However, these raw data are often so detailed and complex as to make it
virtually impossible for a user to compare different facilities, chemicals, or geographic areas. So,
in addition to gathering all this information into one location for the first time, SFIP is unique in
that it structures and aggregates the data so a user can easily view, compare, and analyze
information from different facilities.


What information sources does SFIP use?
SFIP includes compliance and enforcement information submitted to state and federal regulators,
as well as chemical release information submitted under the federal Toxics Release Inventory
(TRI).  SFIP also links data submitted to state and federal agencies by facilities regulated under
the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Recovery and Conservation Act, and the
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act. Finally, statistics about the
population around facilities were  taken from census reports, and information about production
was gathered from outside sources.

To link all these data, SFIP has used an interactive, high-speed data retrieval and integration
system developed by EPA, called the Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) system.

Are Toxics Release Inventory (TRI)  emissions from industrial facilities legal and
permitted?
TRI only affects the reporting of releases and off-site transfers. Just because a chemical is
reported under TRI does not make it illegal. A TRI chemical release may be legal and fully
permitted.  In fact, most of the chemicals reported under the TRI program are allowable under
existing single-media permits (i.e., for air, water, or hazardous solid waste) or are unregulated.

Why do some facilities under SFIP have no TRI releases or transfers?
There are several possible reasons why no TRI data are reported, such as:
*•      A facility may have been idle during the reporting period.
*      A facility may be small and fall under reporting thresholds.
*•      A facility may not? have properly filed the necessary data.

What indicators of noncompliance are included in SFIP?
The SFIP uses several  indicators, including:
*•      historical noncompliance, which indicates the frequency of problems over time.
>       significant noncompliance (SNC), which indicates a current major noncompliance
       problem or a series of problems.
>•      the number of times that a facility has exceeded its Clean Water Act National Pollution

                                          B-2

-------
       Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) pollution limits.
*•      On-site spills of chemicals subject to the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
       Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), also known as the Superfund Law. These
       spills are reported to the Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS).

How does SFIP indicate the severity and duration of noncompliance problems?
SFIP allows users to dig down into the underlying data to find out more about a violation. For
instance, SFIP provides underlying information about the duration of a problem, such as whether
it extended into more than one quarter. By considering the type and duration of any
noncompliance event in conjunction with other data, SFIP users can draw their own conclusions
about the severity of the problem.

Does the use of "indexing" mean that individual facilities will be ranked?
The term "indexing" describes the process that SFIP uses to identify all facilities and data.  The
facilities have not been ranked in any way.

How accurate are SFIP data?
EPA worked for three years to identify the facilities to be included in SFIP, and to collect and
verify the data.  Each facility received a copy of its compliance and enforcement data for review,
to make sure that any problems were identified before the information was distributed through
SFIP.

Prior to the industry data review, EPA specifically asked the states to review the data and make
changes as appropriate. Based upon these data reviews, EPA believes that the information in the
underlying databases is generally of high quality. EPA will continue to work with stakeholders
to ensure the greatest possible quality of data in SFIP.

How will EPA ensure that SFIP data continue to be accurate when the data are updated?
The accuracy of the data depends upon reliable reporting by states, local agencies, and industry.
Accuracy also depends upon correct recording of information by regulatory agencies at local,
state, and federal levels.  EPA, in conjunction with the affected stakeholders, will continue to
work at improving the quality and consistency of the underlying data.  EPA has set up an SFIP
Hotline (617-520-3015) for users to ask questions about the data and has also established a
"comment page" on the SFIP website for users to submit their comments instantly.

Has this information ever been released before?
The information in SFIP  has been available to the public directly through different data systems,
publications, and in several places on the Internet. EPA has gathered all this data into one
location, improved the data quality, and made the data easier to work with and understand.


If I work for a facility included in SFIP and suspect that the data need to be corrected,
what should I do?

                                          B-3

-------
A system has been established for making changes to the SFIP data.  To report a possible
inaccuracy, users can call the SFIP Hotline at 617-520-3015 and explain their concern. They will
then be directed to the proper individual within EPA. In addition, a "comment page" is located
on the SFIP website for users to instantly submit comments on any aspect of the project,
including concerns with regard to the data.


How can the public and other non-government entities use SFIP?
SFIP enables users to research environmental compliance and chemical releases at individual
facilities. SFIP is especially useful for comparing information about different facilities in a
particular industry; evaluating and comparing chemicals used by an industry, measuring
compliance and chemical release trends over time,  identifying common compliance problems and
developing solutions to them, and identifying issues that may warrant further research.

Will SFIP affect the way companies in these industry sectors conduct business?
EPA is hopeful that  SFIP will create an additional "compliance incentive" for companies.  SFIP
may lead to collaborative efforts between EPA and industry to design compliance assistance
programs. It also  may assist states and facilities in taking a more holistic, multimedia perspective
about their business, and may help them to identify pollution prevention opportunities. In
addition, as companies increasingly look to make exemplary  environmental records known, SFIP
will provide a platform for those that demonstrate a commitment to the environment, and may
help to identify high-performing facilities that can be recognized publicly.

If I am interested in records for facilities in other sectors, where can I obtain information?
EPA is developing procedures for providing information on additional facilities in the future.
Meanwhile, you can contact EPA or your state/local environmental agency to request specific
facility information.

In what forms are the SFIP data available?
SFIP is available online for use by the general public.  The SFIP Internet address is as follows:
                          http://www.epa.gov/oeca/sfi                          |
Anyone who wishes to use SFIP online should read the introductory information carefully before
proceeding.

Documentation can be obtained by calling the SFIP Hotline at 617-520-3015.
                                          B-4

-------
                                     Appendix C
                   PROJECT DESIGN/RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

A.     Selection of Sectors for the Sector Indexing Project

EPA used the following criteria to choose the sectors included in this pilot project:

       •      the sector must fall within manufacturing Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
             codes 20-39;
       •      the sector must have a small number of facilities (under 1,000);
             facilities must have high relative pollutant output per facility;
       •      facilities must have relatively similar processes and products; and
       •      the sectors must have several comparative sources of facility data.

Based on these criteria, the petroleum refining, automobile assembly, pulp manufacturing, iron
and steel production, and primary nonferrous metals (aluminum, copper, lead, zinc) sectors were
selected.  The criteria used allowed EPA to focus on industries that were of manageable size, had
similar processes and were of importance to the Agency from a pollutant release perspective.
The 1995 White House Reinventing Environmental Protection Report specifically asked EPA to
focus on a total of five sectors.

B.     Explanation of Indexing, Permit Linkages and Sector Universe Definition

Once the five sectors were chosen, the next step was to identify which facilities were operating
within each sector. The following sequential steps were taken to index each sector.  "Indexing"
refers to the process used to identify facilities and then find and "link" the appropriate
permits and data records associated with each facility. Indexing allows EPA to provide
detailed information for each facility based upon the underlying data associated with each permit.

Step 1: Develop "Master List" of Facilities This step included:

       •      defining the scope of each sector for purposes of this study,

       •      researching the best available facility lists from a wide range of EPA and non-
             EPA data sources, and

       •      consolidating the lists to develop a "master list" of facilities to be used as the basis
             of subsequent facility-based analyses.
                                          C-l

-------
In general, EPA concluded that there is often no single listing of facilities that serves as the sole
data source for a given industry.  In most instances, it is necessary to canvas available industry-
specific resources, evaluate the relative strengths and weaknesses of each list, and develop a
hybrid list. The following data sources were used to develop the master list for each sector.

       Petroleum Refining: Department of Energy list of active petroleum refineries. U.S.
       Refining Capacity, January 1, 1995.

       Automobile Assembly: The universe of facilities engaged in automobile and light truck
       assembly was taken from a list of such facilities provided by industrial trade associations
       to the EPA Common Sense Initiative (CSI) workgroup. The universe includes 58
       facilities, two of which are operated jointly. The list includes all domestic manufacturing
       plants, regardless of ownership. It was reviewed by industry CSI participants and trade
       associations.  Please note that the automobile assembly index does not include the
       extensive universe of automotive parts manufacturers and suppliers since these facilities
       are fundamentally different operations.

       Pulp Manufacturing:  Lockwood-Post Directory (privately developed data).  The
       resulting universe includes 247 facilities that were flagged in the Lockwood-Post
       Directory as having pulp-making capacity.'

       Iron and Steel Production:  Industrial trade association membership directory of iron
       and steel plants (Iron and Steel Directory and Steel Manufacturers Association
       Membership Directory); EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) list
       of integrated facilities;  trade publication of minimills (33 Metals Producing magazine). If
       a facility was identified by the directories as having a furnace (basic oxygen or electric arc
       furnace) or as being involved in cokemaking, it was included on the master list. Since
       there are fundamental differences between each operation, the complete iron and steel list
       is then sorted into two sub-sectors: integrated mills (cokemaking and basic oxygen
       furnace); and mini-mills (electric arc furnace). Facility-specific furnace and cokemaking
       information (and  production capacity information) were added from a list of integrated
       steel mills provided by OAQPS and from a list of mini-mills from 33 Metal Producing
       magazine.  A total of 118 mills were identified as having a steel-making furnace or coke-
       making capacity.

       Primary Nonferrous Metal Refining and Smelting: OAQPS list of primary smelting
       operations; Bureau of Mines list of primary smelting and refining operations.  The Sector
       Facility Indexing Project included data on four primary lead smelters, 23 primary
       aluminum smelters, 21 copper smelters and/or refineries, and three zinc smelters.
        'Facilities engaged in pulp making (including, but not limited to: pulping from virgin wood fiber,
 defibrating, paper recycling with deinking) were included in this analysis. Some such facilities are also involved in
 paper making, paperboard and/or non-paper production lines.

                                            C-2

-------
       Secondary smelters (that refine from previously manufactured scraps) are not included in
       this analysis.

Selection Criteria for Including Facilities.  The decision to include a facility within SFIP was
determined based upon whether the facility operated the key process equipment that defines each
given industry. For example, the existence of a either a basic oxygen furnace or an electric arc
furnace was a precondition for being included in the iron and steel index. The determination as
to whether the defined preconditions were  met were based upon available sector-specific data
within the sources listed above. This was done to strengthen the ability to compare facilities
within each sector based upon the similarity of their processes and products. If EPA was not able
to positively make a determination as to whether the industrial process was a minor part of the
facility's operation, the facility was kept on the master list. The determinations made regarding
whether facilities were included or not included were made for purposes of this project only, and
do not reflect any decisions regarding  regulatory definitions within single-media programs.

Inclusion of Permits from other Industrial Processes. The definition of "facility" needed to be
examined in deciding what data records should be included in a facility's profile. Once the
decision was made as to whether the facility was on the master list, EPA needed to decide what
records should be included in situations when multiple operations were being conducted at a
facility. When the data indicated that there were several processes occurring at the same location
or nearby (e.g., a pulp mill  and a chemical  plant), EPA had to make the decision as to whether
the complete records of all  operations  should be included, or whether only the operations
pertaining to the relevant sector should to be included.  Under the "facility approach" it is
important that all records at a single facility are kept together to ensure that  EPA knows what is
happening at the facility. This allows  EPA to perform data screening that examines all portions
of the facility. However, under the "sector approach," it is more appropriate that records are
analyzed based upon the industrial processes that are being examined.  This strengthens that
ability to form comparisons across facilities.

For the purpose of this pilot project, the following approach was used.  Using the examples listed
above, where the pulp mill  is co-located with a chemical plant, EPA did not include the records
associated with the chemical plant, which was not in the scope of SFIP. This approach was taken
to strengthen the comparability  of records across facilities within the same sector. In some
instances, facilities may have permits that cover all  industrial processes at the site. In this
situation, EPA is unable to  identify and break apart  environmental records by industrial process.
For example, the SFIP includes TRI submissions for all establishments within a facility.  EPA
also identified cases, however, in which processes within a given facility had been split apart
when the information was submitted to EPA. If the processes split apart were deemed to be
essential processes associated with the given sector, the records were consolidated together.  It is
important to note that the issue of multiple operations arose in a relatively small  percentage of
facilities examined under this project.
                                           C-3

-------
Step 2: Sector Facility Indexing/Linking The following steps were designed to ensure that
each facility on the "Master List" had complete permit linkages, i.e., a listing of all permits and
data records associated with a given facility.  Correct permit linkages allow EPA to overcome the
great majority of data problems that have previously hampered multimedia and sector data
analysis efforts. Three separate automated systems were used to identify permits:  1) Facility
Indexing System (FINDS) linkage, 2) Dun and Bradstreet linkage, and 3) TRI linkage. Each of
these linkages were used to identify possible permits under core EPA programs - the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and the Toxics Release
Inventory. The list of permits from all three systems were then manually reviewed, and incorrect
linkages were taken out.  In some instances these linkages did not identify permits under some
regulatory programs.  When this occurred, EPA performed an "orphan" search which consisted
of a series of manual name and location database queries to find the permits that were missing.
This was done based on the assumption that the overwhelming majority of facilities within the
five sectors profiled are expected to have permits or records for each of the four major programs
examined. The index was then reviewed by EPA regional offices, and the facilities themselves,
to verify that the linkage information was correct.  As new information becomes available and
facilities change ownership or permits, EPA plans to continue updating the indices.
                                          C-4

-------
                                     Appendix D
                   SFIP COMMENT AND DATA REVIEW PROCESS

EPA is committed to affording all stakeholders an opportunity to comment formally on SFIP in
its entirety, as well as to review the project's underlying data. Therefore, from the onset of this
project, the Agency embarked upon an extensive review and outreach process.

In the fall of 1996, EPA solicited each state environmental commissioner for comment and
assistance on the project while also providing the states the opportunity to review the data during
a combined EPA regional/state review period that was conducted from November 1, 1996
through February 28, 1997. Prior to SFIP, EPA had never before done this level of research
regarding the multimedia records of individual facilities and the Agency believed it was
necessary that such a review take place.  Thus, in verifying or correcting the data, the EPA
Regions were asked to consult with the states and work closely with them, particularly with
regard to the data that had been previously submitted by the states themselves. The Agency
regarded this collaboration as an important process to ensure that the facility-specific compliance
and enforcement data is accurately reported to the public. Most of the comments raised by the
states participating in the review were relatively minor and were resolved through the
coordinated EPA-state effort.

Public Comment

On May  14, 1997, EPA held a day long public meeting, during which private citizens, industry,
environmental organizations, as well as the states were invited to comment on the overall
purpose and methodology used in the project. They were also invited to provide alternative ways
of analyzing and presenting the data. Following the public meeting, EPA held a  one-month
written comment period to accommodate those that could not provide comments in person. All
comments were submitted to the SFIP Docket (Administrative Record 178) which was
established to provide a public record of this project and allow for inspection of all relevant
materials by interested parties. These  comments were reviewed and further analyzed by EPA.

Since much of the data was originally  submitted by the states, further efforts to obtain state
involvement in the project were undertaken.  EPA met with the Director of the Environmental
Council of the States (ECOS). EPA also addressed several meetings of ECOS to ensure that the
states were heard and represented on this project.

Understanding that the states are critical in helping EPA provide quality data and in making SFIP
a success, EPA also held two meetings in early 1998 with ECOS, specifically on SFIP.  The
meetings were arranged in order to provide the states with a better understanding of the goals and
purpose of SFIP, as well as to  discuss any concerns or suggestions the states had with regard to
this project. The meetings were both beneficial and productive allowing for collaboration with
the states and an ongoing discussion of the issues.
                                          D-l

-------
Oral and written statements made by several commenters, including state and industry
representatives, urged the Agency to provide the affected facilities an opportunity to review the
underlying compliance and enforcement data before the data were published. In response to
these comments, EPA, in August 1997, provided each affected facility with a copy of the
individual environmental records the Agency proposed to include in SFIP. While this data
quality review was voluntary and participation was solely at the discretion of the individual
facilities, approximately 62 percent chose to submit comments.

Concurrent with the direct mailing to each facility covered by SFIP, EPA established a hotline to
answer any questions facilities may have had concerning their data or the review in general. We
received numerous calls on the hotline and provided assistance to those who called throughout
the review period. During this unparalleled effort, we catalogued and tracked all comments
submitted, even those sent in after the deadline. This tracking enabled the Agency to ensure that
all data comments were addressed by EPA in conjunction with the appropriate state agency.
Based upon these comments, EPA modified the data as appropriate.

Summary of Data Quality Assurance Review

Two-thirds of the SFIP facilities submitted comments as part of the quality assurance review
which was open from August through October 1997. A small number of comments have been
received and processed since the October deadline.  The review categorized data elements into
two categories: major elements, which include linked permits, enforcement actions and facility
compliance status; and minor elements, which include facility name, address and date of
inspection. Approximately 37,000 major data elements were presented to the facilities that
submitted comments. Comments were received on 3,400 data elements. Of those, EPA and the
state governments agreed that changes were appropriate in 1,700 cases. Comments were
received on approximately 1,000 of the 19,000 minor data elements presented. Of those, EPA
and the state governments agreed that changes were appropriate in 500 cases.

•     Permit Linkages => Permits of several co-located operations (e.g., TRI submissions for
       on-site energy production, sawmills) were sent to the facilities for their comment rather
       than have SFIP make the call about appropriate linking. Facilities commented on 211 of
       the 1,790 total permit linkages presented for review.  Of these comments, 158 were
       accepted.
•     Enforcement Actions => Facilities commented on 64 of the 376 enforcement actions
       presented. Of these comments, 41 were accepted. Facilities identified another 20 actions
       not listed, ten of which have been accepted.
•     Significant Noncompliance (SNC) Status => Facilities commented on 103 of the 1,292
       eligible data elements. Of these comments, 90 were accepted.
•     Quarterly Compliance Status => Facilities commented on approximately 3,000 of the
       30,000 quarters of historical compliance status presented for review.  Of those, comments

                                          D-2

-------
       were accepted on approximately 2,400 quarters. Note: These values represent an average
       of the number of quarters presented and commented upon since comments were not
       coded separately for all eight quarters.

•      Inspections => Facilities commented on 75 of the 3,761 inspections presented. Of these
       comments, 31 were accepted.  Another 241 inspections were identified, of which 88 have
       been accepted.

Science Advisory Board Review

Consistent with existing projects already distributed to the public by the Agency, EPA plans to
add information on the toxicity of individual chemicals to SFIP in the future.  A weighting
system was proposed for use in SFIP based upon prior stakeholder comments that known
chemical toxicity data should be used to distinguish chemicals of high hazard from chemicals of
lower hazard. EPA also indicated in public SFIP documents that the long-term goal of the
project is to incorporate relative risk-based information, but that a toxicity weighting approach
would be used as an interim step until a viable relative risk model is ready.  Toxicity weighting
allows users to examine where potential hazards may be without respect to whether population
may be affected. Relative risk-based analysis examines the interaction between chemical
releases, toxicity, weather patterns, chemical dispersion properties, and surrounding populations.
Consistent with public comment, SFIP will pursue for future iterations incorporation of both
toxicity and risk-based analysis, and is pursuing the use of the TRI Relative Risk-based
Environmental Indicators Model being developed  by the EPA Office of Prevention, Pesticides,
and Toxic Substances.

Given the important relationship between risk and toxicity-weighted scoring, EPA has decided
for this pilot release of SFIP not to use facility-specific toxicity-weightings independently from
the risk-based methodologies that are under development. EPA agrees with the SAB that the
scientific underpinnings of the toxicity weightings are sound and will continue to pursue its
efforts toward communicating hazard and risk information in the future.
                                          D-3

-------