United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Publication 9320.7-061
Solid Waste and September 1997
Emergency Response
ERA Supplementary Materials:
National Priorities List,
Proposed Rule and Final Rule
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
State & Site Identification Center (5204G)
Intermittent Bulletin
Volume 7, Number 2 (Proposed Rule)
Volume 4, Number 2 (Final Rule)
The National Priorities List (NPL) informs the
public of uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that
warrant further investigation to determine if they pose
risks to human health or the environment. Such sites
are eligible for long-term "remedial action" financed
under the Trust Fund established by the Comprehen-
sive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended by the
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986 (SARA). In October 1990, CERCLA was
extended to September 30, 1994. An appropriation by
Congress for Fiscal Year 1995 authorized Superfund
to continue to operate. The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) has the primary
responsibility for managing the Superfund program.
Contents
How Sites Are Placed on the NPL 2
Statutory Requirements and Listing Policies 3
NPL Status (September 1997) 4
How Sites Are Deleted From the NPL 5
Removing Proposed Sites 6
Key Dates In Superfund 7
Lists and Data Summaries '. 8
Federal Facilities Section (by State) 9
Proposed Sites (by State) . . . . . 14
Sites Deleted from the NPL , 17
NPL Sites Per State/Territory {by Total Sites) 22
Proposed Rule Site Scores 23
Final Rule Site Scores 24
Federal Register Notices 25
-------
HOW SITES ARE PLACED
ONTHENPL
EPA uses informal rulemaking to place sites on
the NPL. Sites are first proposed to the NPL in the
Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments
on the sites (typically for 60 days), responds to the
comments, and finally places on the NPL those sites
that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Section 300.425(c) of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), the Federal regulation by which CERCLA is
implemented (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990), provides
three mechanisms for placing sites on the NPL. The
primary mechanism is EPA's Hazard Ranking System
(HRS): The original HRS, developed in 1982,
evaluated the relative threat a site posed to human
health or the environment over five "pathways," or
routes of exposure. The HRS score was based on the
evaluation of three pathways through which
contaminants can migrate: ground water, surface
water, and air. The other two pathways, direct
contact and fire/explosion, were evaluated to
determine the need for immediate removal
(emergency) action. HRS scores ranged from 0 to
100. An HRS score of 28.50 was selected as the
cutoff point for the first proposed NPL to identify at
least 400 sites, the minimum suggested by CERCLA.
On December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532), EPA
revised the HRS, as required by SARA. The revised
HRS became effective oh March 14, 1991. It is a
more comprehensive and accurate scoring system than
the original HRS and may add new types of sites to
the NPL. '
The revised HRS retains the same cutoff score and
basic approach as the original HRS, while
incorporating SARA requirements as well as
improvements identified as necessary by EPA and the
public. The revised HRS retains the ground water,
surface water, and air pathways, drops the direct
contact and fire/explosion pathways, and adds a fourth
pathway, soil exposure. All four can be used to
calculate the site score.
The second mechanism for placing sites on the
NPL allows States or Territories to designate one top-
priority site regardless of score. Of the 57 States and
Territories, 40 have designated top-priority sites.
Seven of
these sites have been deleted from the NPL because no
further response was necessary.
The third mechanism allows listing a site if it
meets all three of these requirements:
The Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR) of the U.S.
Public Health Service has issued a health
advisory that recommends removing people
from the site.
EPA determines the site poses a significant
threat to public health.
EPA anticipates it will be more cost-effective
to use its remedial authority (available only at
NPL sites) than to use its emergency removal
authority to respond to the site.
Thirteen sites have been listed on the NPL on the
basis of ATSDR advisories:
Eleven are on the NPL: Forest Glen
Mobile Home Subdivision, Niagara
Falls, NY, and Radium Chemical Co.,
Inc., New York City, NY (54 FR
48184, November 21, 1989); White
Chemical Corp., Newark NJ (56 FR
48438, September 25, 1991); Austin
Avenue Radiation Site, Delaware
County, PA (57 FR 47181, October 14,
1992); Lower Ecorse Creek Dump,
Wyandotte, MI (59 FR 27989, May 31,
1994); Raymark Industries, Inc.,
Stratford, CT (59 FR 2568 January 19,
1995); Tennessee Products,
Chattanooga, TN (60 FR 50435,
September 29, 1995); Aircraft
Components (D&L Sales), Benton
Harbor, MI; H&K Sales, Belding, MI;
Little Valley, Little Valley, NY (61 FR
30510, June 17, 1996) and Grand Street
Mercury, Hoboken, NJ (September
1997).
One, Lansdowne Radiation Site, Lansdowne,
PA has been deleted because all appropriate
response has been completed (56 FR 46121,
September 10, 1991).
One, Quail Run 'Mobile Manor, Gray
Summit, MO (48 FR 40674, September 8,
-------
1983) was dropped from 'further
consideration on February 11, 1991 (56 FR
5598). Because of an EPA removal action,
ATSDR had. rescinded its health advisory.
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS AND
LISTING POLICIES
CERCLA restricts EPA's authority to respond to
certain sites by expressly excluding some substances -
petroleum, for example - from the definition of
"release." In addition, as a matter of policy, EPA
may choose not to use CERCLA because the Federal
government can undertake or enforce cleanup under
other laws, thus preserving CERCLA funds for sites
not covered by other laws. EPA has chosen not to use
CERCLA for certain types of sites regulated by
Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC). However, if EPA later determines that sites
not listed as a matter of policy are not being properly
responded to, it may consider placing them on the
NPL.
RCRA-Related Sites
When the first final NPL was promulgated in
September 1983, EPA announced certain listing
policies relating to sites that might qualify for the
NPL. One of these policies involved facilities subject
to RCRA Subtitle C. EPA's policy was generally not
to place on the NPL, RCRA "regulated units" (for
example, land disposal units that received hazardous
waste after the effective date of the RCRA land
disposal regulations) because EPA can require the
owner/operator to clean up under RCRA. The RCRA
cleanup process and standards are similar to those
under CERCLA, ensuring that all actions taken will
protect human health and the environment.
In November 1984, the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments (HSWA) to RCRA were enacted,
expanding EPA's authority to require corrective
measures under Subtitle C. As a result of this
broadened RCRA authority, EPA revised its policy for
placing non-Federal RCRA-regulated sites on the
NPL, and on June 10, 1986 (54 FR 21057) announced
that facilities subject to RCRA Subtitle C corrective
action authorities would be placed on the
NPL if one or more of these conditions exists:
The facilities are owned by persons who have
demonstrated an inability to finance
appropriate corrective action by invoking
bankruptcy laws.
The facilities have lost authorization to
operate (also known as the Loss of Interim
Status, or LOIS provision), and there are
additional indications that the owner or
operator is unwilling to undertake corrective
action.
The facilities have not lost authorization to
operate but have a clear history of
unwillingness to undertake corrective action.
These situations are determined on a case-by-
case basis.
On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978) and October 9,
1989 (54 FR 41000), EPA announced additional
components of the NPL/RCRA policy. As a matter of
policy, EPA will list four additional categories of
RCRA-related sites:
Facilities that were treating, storing, or
disposing of Subtitle C hazardous Waste after
November 19, 1980, but that did not file a
"Part A," the initial part of the permit
application, by mat date as required and have
little or no history of compliance with
RCRA. EPA believes that these non- or late
filers, although they are technically subject to
RCRA, are not likely to be cleaned up
expeditiously under RCRA and so should be
on the NPL. However, if such, facilities have
complied with RCRA, EPA may consider
whether listing is necessary.
Facilities with permits for the treatment,
storage, or disposal of hazardous waste
issued before enactment of HSWA, and
whose owners/operators will not voluntarily
modify the permit. Pre-rHSWA permittees are
not required to take corrective action for
releases. Under RCRA Section 3004(u),
EPA does not have the authority to modify a
pre-HSWA permit for corrective action until
the permit is reissued.
-------
NPL Status (September 1997)
Number of Sites on Final NPL
Total: 1,204
General Superfund Section: 1,053
Federal Facilities Section: 151
Number of Sites Remaining on Proposed NPL
Total: 52
General Superfund Section: 46
Federal Facilities Section: 6
Total Number of Final and Proposed Sites
1,256
Number of Sites on the Construction Completion List
447
Number of Sites Deleted from Final NPL
149
Number of Sites with Partial Deletions
6
Facilities that filed a Part A permit
application for treatment, storage, or
disposal of Subtitle C hazardous waste as a
precautionary measure only. Such facilities
- for example, generators, transporters, or
recyclers of hazardous waste are not
subject to Subtitle C corrective action
authorities. These.are referred to as
protective filers.
Facilities that at one .time treated or stored
Subtitle' C hazardous waste but have since
converted to generator-only status (i.e.,
facilities that now store hazardous waste for
90 days or less) or any other hazardous .
waste activity not requiring Interim Status.
These facilities, whose Part A permit
applications have been withdrawn with EPA
or State approval, are referred to as
conveners. EPA believes it has the
authority under RCRA Section 3008(u) to
compel corrective action at such facilities.
However, RCRA's corrective action
program currently focuses primarily on
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities
(due to permitting deadlines in RCRA).
Therefore, this category should be on the
NPL to ensure expeditious cleanup.
However, if a consent order requiring
remedial action is in effect, a converter
need not be listed.
Federal Facility Sites
CERCLA Section 120(a) requires that Federal
facilities be subject to and comply with CERCLA in
the same manner as any nongovernmental entity.
CERCLA Section lll(e)(3), however, generally
prohibits use of the Trust Fund for remedial actions
at Federally owned facilities. Thus, Federal
agencies must use their own funds for cleanup.
Federal sites are listed hi a separate section of
Appendix B, rather than in the General Superfund
Section.
Because most Federal facilities have RCRA-
regulated units within their boundaries, EPA
determined that a separate NPL/RCRA policy
should be adopted for Federal facilities. As a result,
on March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10520), EPA announced
it would place on the NPL those sites located on
-------
Federally owned or operated facilities that meet the
NPL eligibility requirements - e.g., HRS scores of
28.50 or greater even if the Federal facility also is
subject to the corrective action authorities of RCRA
Subtitle C. Cleanup, if appropriate, could then
proceed at those sites under either CERCLA or
RCRA. The policy is based on several
considerations:
to require cleanup of releases from such facilities.
EPA will, however, list releases from facilities that
hold a current license issued by a State pursuant to
an agreement between the State and the NRC under
Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act. Facilities
whose licenses are no longer in effect are also
considered for listing.
Congress clearly intended that Federal
facility sites should be on the NPL.
Strict application of the non-Federal
NPL/RCRA policy would exclude virtually
all Federal facility sites from the NPL
because they would not likely meet any of
the criteria necessary for listing (inability to
pay as evidenced by invocation of
bankruptcy laws or demonstrated
unwillingness to comply with RCRA).
Placing RCRA-regulated Federal sites on
the NPL serves the primary purpose of
listing Federal facility sites to advise the
public of the status of Federal government
cleanup efforts.
Listing these sites helps Federal agencies
set priorities and focus cleanup efforts on
those sites that present the most serious
problem.
Radioactive Release Sites
CERCLA Section 101(22) excludes several
types of releases of radioactive materials from die
statutory definition of "release." These releases are
therefore not eligible for CERCLA response actions
or the NPL. The exclusions apply to (1) releases of
source, by-product, or special nuclear material from
a nuclear incident if these releases are subject to
financial protection requirements under Section 170
of the Atomic Energy Act and (2) any releases of
source, by-product, or special nuclear material from
any processing site designated under the Uranium
Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978.
Accordingly, such radioactive releases have not been
considered eligible for the NPL.
As a policy matter, EPA has also chosen not to
list releases of source, by-product, or special nuclear
material from any facility with a current license
issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC), on the grounds that NRC has full authority
HOW SITES ARE DELETED
FROM THE NPL
EPA may delete a final NPL site if it
determines that no further response is required to
protect human health or the environment. Under
Section 300.425(e) of the NCP (55 FR 8845, March
8, 1990,) a site may be deleted where no further
response is appropriate if EPA determines that one
of the following criteria has been met:
EPA, in conjunction with the State, has
determined that responsible or other parties
have implemented all appropriate response
action required.
EPA, in consultation with the State, has
determined that all appropriate Superfund-
financed response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and that no further response
by responsible parties is appropriate.
A remedial investigation has shown that the
release poses no significant threat to public
health or the environment, and, therefore
remedial measures are not appropriate.
Since 1986, EPA has followed these procedures
for deleting a site from the NPL:
The Regional Administrator approves a
"close-out report" which establishes that all
appropriate response action has been taken
or that no action is required.
The Regional Office obtains State
concurrence.
EPA publishes a notice of intent to delete in
the Federal Register and in a major
newspaper near the community involved.
A public comment period is provided.
EPA responds to the comments and, if the
site continues to warrant deletion, publishes
-------
a deletion notice in the Federal Register.
Sites that have been deleted from the NPL
remain eligible for further Superfund-financed
remedial action in the unlikely event that conditions
in the future warrant such action.
In November 1995, EPA initiated a new policy
to delete portions of NPL sites where cleanup is
complete (60 FR 55465, November 1, 1995). Total
site cleanup may take many years, while portions of
the site may have been cleaned up and available for
productive use. As of September 1997, EPA has
partially deleted six sites.
REMOVING PROPOSED SITES
As of September 1997, 79 sites have been
proposed for the NPL but subsequently removed
from further consideration, most of them because
their final HRS scores were below the 28.50 cutoff
or they are subject to RCRA Subtitle C. Three of
the sites were reproposed on February 7, 1992 (57
FR 4824) after being rescored with the revised
HRS.
-------
Key Dates in Superfund
Legislation
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) enacted December 11,1980; Trust Fund of $1.6 billion
authorized over 5 years
CERCLA amended by Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
(SARA) enacted October 17,1986; Trust Fund of $8.5 billion authorized
over 5 years
CERCLA extended to September 30,1994; an additional $5.1 billion
authorized
Federal regulation implementing Superfund: National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP)
Revised July 16,1982 (47 FR 31180) to incorporate CERCLA requirements
Revised March 8,1990 (55 FR 8666) in response to CERCLA Section 105,
amended by SARA
Hazard Ranking System
Promulgated July 16,1982 (47 FR 31180) as Appendix A of the NCP
Revised December 14,1990 (55 FR 51532) in response to CERCLA
Section 105(c), added by SARA; effective date March 14,1991
National Priorities List
Promulgated September 8,1983 (48 FR 40658) as Appendix B of the NCP
Must be updated at least annually
Last sites proposed under original MRS promulgated February 11,1991 (56
FR 5598); Construction Completion category activated (56 FR 5634)
First sites proposed under revised HRS July 29, .1991 (56 FR 35840)
First sites added to NPL under revised HRS October 14,1992 (57 FR
47181)
Construction Completion List activated March 2,1993 (58 FR 12142)
-------
LISTS AND DATA SUMMARIES
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
. September 1997
St Site Name
City/County
Date
Proposed Final
AK Adak Naval Air Station
AK Eielson Air Force Base
AK Elmendorf Air Force Base
AK Fort Richardson (USARMY)
AK Fort Wainwright
AK Standard Steel&Metals Salvage YardCUSDOT
6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6
AL Alabama Army Ammunition Plant
AL Armiston Army Depot (SE Industrial Area)
AL Redstone Arsenal (USARMY/NASA)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
AZ Luke Air Force Base
AZ Williams Air Force Base
AZ Yuna Marine Corps Air Station
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
CA Barstow Marine Corps Logistics Base
CA Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base
CA Castle Air Force Base
CA Concord Naval Weapons Station
CA Edwards Air Force Base
CA El Toro Marine Corps Air Station
CA Fort Ord
CA George Air Force Base
CA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA)
CA LEHR/Old Campus Landfill (USDOE)
CA Lawrence Liver-more Lab Site 300 (USDOE)
CA Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (USDOE)
CA March Air Force Base
CA Mather Air Force Base
CA McClellan Air Force Base (GW Contain)
CA Moffett Naval Air Station
CA Norton Air Force Base
CA Riverbank Army Annum tion Plant
CA Sacramento Army Depot
CA Sharpe Army Depot
CA Tracy Defense Depot (USARMY)
CA Travis Air Force Base
CA Treasure Island Naval Station-Hun Pt An
23 Final + 0 Proposed = 23
CO Air Force Plant PJK$
CO Rocky Flats Plant (USDOE)
CO Rocky Mountain Arsenal (USARMY)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
CT New London Submarine Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
DE Dover Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Adak 10/92 05/94
Fairbanks N Star Boro 07/89 11/89
Greater Anchorage Bor 07/89 08/90
Anchorage 06/93 05/94
Fairbanks N Star Boro 07/89 08/90
Anchorage 07/89 08/90
Childersburg 10/84 07/87
Anniston 10/84 03/89
HuntsviIIe 06/93 05/94
Glendale 07/89 08/90
Chandler 07/89 11/89
Yuma 06/88 02/90
Barstow
San Diego County
Merced
Concord
Kern County
El Toro
Marina
Victorville
Pasadena
.Davis
Livermore
Livermore
Riverside
Sacramento
Sacramento
Sunnyvale
San Bernardino
Riverbank
Sacramento
Lathrop
Tracy
Solano County »
San Francisco
07/89
07/89
10/84
02/92
07/89
06/88
07/89
07/89
02/92
01/94
07/89
10/84
07/89
10/84
10/84
04/85
10/84
06/88
10/84
10/84
07/89
07/89
07/89
11/89
11/89
07/87
12/94
08/90
02/90
02/90
02/90
10/92
05/94
08/90
07/87
11/89
07/87
07/87
07/87
07/87
02/90
07/87
07/87
08/90
11/89
11/89
Uaterton
Golden
Adams County
New London
Dover
07/89
10/84
10/84
11/89
10/89
07/87
10/89 08/90
10/84 03/89
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
. September 1997
Date
St
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA
GU
HI
HI
HI
IA
ID
ID
IL
IL
IL
IL
KS
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
September 1997
Date
St.
HA
MO
MD
HO
MO
HO
HO
HE
HE
HE
MI
HN
HN
MO
HO
MO
NC
NC
NE
NH
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
Site Name
South Weymouth Naval Air Station
8 Final + 0 Proposed = 8
Aberdeen Proving Ground (Edgewood Area)
Aberdeen Proving GroundCMichaelsvi lie LF
Beltsville Agricultural Research (USD A)
Fort George G. Meade
Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center
Patuxent River Naval Air Station
5 Final + 1 Proposed = 6
Brunswick Naval Air Station
Lor ing Air Force Base
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
Uurtsmith Air Force Base
0 Final + 1 Proposed = 1
Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant
New Brighton/Arden Hills/TCAAP (USARHY)
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Lake City Army Ammu. Plant (NU Lagoon)
We I don Spring Former Army Ordnance Works
Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/PittsCUSDOE)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
Camp Lejeune Military Res. (USNAVY)
Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Cornhusker Army Ammunrtion Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Pease Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Federal Aviation Admin. Tech. Center
Fort Dix (Landfill Site)
Naval Air Engineering Center
Naval Weapons Station Earle (Site A)
Pica tinny Arsenal (USARMY)
W.R. Grace/Wayne, Interim Storage (USDOE)
City/County
Weymouth
Edgewood
Aberdeen
Beltsville
Odenton
Indian Head
St. Mary's County
Brunswick
Limestone
Kittery
losco County
Fridley
New Brighton
Independence
St. Charles County
St. Charles County
Ons low County
Havelock
Hall County
Portsmouth/Newi ngton
Atlantic County
Pemberton Township
Lakehurst
Colts Neck
Rockaway Township
Wayne Township
Proposed
06/93
04/85
04/85
05/93
04/97
02/95
01/94
10/84
07/89
06/93
01/94
07/89
12/82
10/84
07/89
10/84
06/88
08/94
10/84
07/89
07/89
10/84
09/85
10/84
07/89
09/83
Final
05/94
02/90
10/89
05/94
09/95
05/94
07/87
02/90
05/94
11/89
09/83
07/87
02/90
07/87
10/89
12/94
07/87
02/90
08/90
07/87
07/87
08/90
02/90
09/84
6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6
NM Lee Acres Landfill (USDOI)
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Farmington
06/88 08/90
11
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section. Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
, September 1997
Date
St
NY
NY
NY
NY
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OK
OR
OR
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PR
RI
RI
SC
SC
SD
TN
TN
TN
TN
TX
TX
Site Name
Brookhaven National Laboratory (USDOE)
Griff iss Air Force Base
Pittsburgh Air Force Base
Seneca Army Depot
4 Final +0 Proposed = 4
Air Force Plant 85
Feed Materials Production Center (USDOE)
Mound Plant (USDOE)
Rickenbacker Air National Guard (USAF)
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
3 Final + 2 Proposed = 5
Tinker Air Force(Soldier Cr/Bldg 300)
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Fremont Nat. Forest Uranium Mines (USD A)
Umatilla Army Depot (Lagoons)
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2 ' '
Letterkermy Army Depot (PDO Area)
Letterkermy Army Depot (SE Area)
Naval Air Development Center(8 Areas)
Navy Ships Parts Control Center
Tobyharna Army Depot
Willow Grove Naval Air & Air Res. Stn.
6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6
Naval Security Group Activity
1 Final * 0 Proposed = 1
Davisville Naval Construction Batt Cent
Newport Naval Education/Training Center
2 Final + 0 Propdsed = 2
Parris Island Marine Corps Recruit Depot
Savannah River Site (USDOE)
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Ellsworth Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Arnold Engineering Develop. Ctr. (USAF)
Memphis Defense Depot (DUO
Milan Army Ammunition Plant
Oak Ridge Reservation (USDOE)
3 Final + 1 Proposed = 4
Air Force Plant #4 (General Dynamics)
Lone Star Army Ammunition Plant
City/County
Upton
Rome
Pittsburgh
Romulus
Columbus
Fernald
Miamisburg
Lockbourne
Dayton
Oklahoma City
Lakeview
Hermiston
Franklin County
Chambersburg
Warminster Township-
Mechanicsburg
Tobyharna
Willow Grove
Sahara Seca
North Kingston
Newport
Parris Island
Aiken
Rapid City
Tul lahoma/Manchester
Memphis
Milan
Oak Ridge
Fort Worth
Texarkana
Proposed
07/89
10/84
07/89
07/89
01/94
07/89
07/89
01/94
06/88
04/85
06/93
10/84
04/85
10/84
06/86
01/94
07/89
08/94
06/88
07/89
07/89
08/94
07/89
10/89
08/94
02/92
10/84
07/89
10/84
10/84
Final
11/89
07/87
11/89
08/90
11/89
11/89
10/89
07/87.
04/95
07/87
03/89
07/87
10/89
05/94
08/90
09/95
10/89
11/89
11/89
12/94
11/89
08/90
10/92
07/87
11/89
08/90
07/87
12
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by-State)
< September 1997
Date
St
TX
TX
UT
UT
UT
UT
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
WA
UA
UA
UA
WA
UA
UA
UA
UA
UA
UA
WA
UA
UA
WV
UV
Site Name
Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant
Pantex Plant (USDOE)
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
Hill Air Force Base
Monti cello Mill Tailings (USDOE)
Ogden Defense Depot (DLA)
Tooele Army Depot (North Area)
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
Defense General Supply Center (DLA)
Fort Eustis (US Army)
Lang ley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr
Marine Corps Combat Development Command
Naval Surface Uarfare - Dahlgren
Naval Weapons Station - Yorktoun
Norfolk Naval Base (Sewells Pt Nvl Cmpx)
7 Final + 0 Proposed = 7
American Lake Gardens/McChord AFB .
Sangor Naval Submarine Base
Bangor Ordnance Disposal (USNAVY)
Fairchild Air Force Base (4 Uaste Areas)
Fort Lewis Logistics Center
Hanford 100-Area (USDOE)
Hanford ZOO- Area (USDOE)
Hanford 300-Area (USDOE)
Jackson Park Housing Complex (USNAVY)
Naval Air Station, Uhidbey Island (Ault)
Naval Undersea Uarfare Station (4 Areas)
Old Navy Dump/Manchester Lab(USEPA/NOAA)
Port Hadlock Detachment (USNAVY)
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex
14 Final + 0 Proposed = 14
AUegany Ballistics Laboratory (USNAVY)
West Virginia Ordnance (USARMY) *
City/County
Karnack
Pantex Village
Ogden
Monti cello
Ogden
Tooele
Chesterfield County
Newport News
Hampton
Quant i co
Dahlgren
Yorktown
Norfolk
Tacoma
Silver-dale
Bremerton
Spokane County
Tillicum
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Kitsap County
Uhidbey Island
Keyport
Manchester
Indian Island
Bremerton
Mineral
Point Pleasant
Proposed
07/89
07/91
10/84
07/89
10/84
10/84
10/84
01/94
05/93
05/93
02/92
02/92
06/96
09/83
07/89
10/84
06/88
07/89
06/88
06/88
06/88
06/93
09/85
06/86
01/94
06/93
05/93
06/93
12/82
Final
08/90
05/94
07/87
11/89
07/87
08/90
07/87
12/94
05/94
05/94
10/92
10/92
04/97
09/84
08/90
07/87
03/89
11/89
10/89
10/89
10/89
05/94
02/90
10/89
05/94
05/94
05/94
05/94
09/83
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
UY F.E. Warren Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
151 Final * 6 Proposed = 157
Cheyenne
07/89 02/90
13
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
, September-1997
St
Site Name
Location
Notes"
AX.
CA
CO
n.
<5A
IA
TD
IL
IH
MA
General Super-fund Sites
Monarch Tile Manufacturing, Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
Cooper Drum Co.
GBF, Inc., Dump
Stoker Company
3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3
General Superfund Sites
ASARCO, Inc. (Globe Plant)
Smeltertown Site
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
General Superfund Sites
Florida Petroleum Reprocessors
Normandy Park Apartments
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites =-2
General Superfund Sites
Terry Crk Drdge Spoil Areas/Here Outfall
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
Waterloo Coal Gasification Plant
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
Blackbird Mine
Triumph Mine Tailings Piles
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
General Superfund Sites
Circle Smelting Corp
DePue/New Jersey Zinc/Mobil Chem Corp
Sauget Area 1
3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3
General Superfund Sites
Caro-Or Inc
U.S. Smelter & Lead Refinery Inc.
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
Federal Facility Sites
Sunflower Army Amnunition Plant
0 Genera.I Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
Gulf State Utilities-North Ryan Street
Lincoln Creosote-
Old Citgo Refinery (Bossier City)
3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3
General Superfund Sites
GE - Housatonic River
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
Federal Facility Sites
Fort George G. Meade
0 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 1
Florence
South Gate
Antioch
Imperial
Denver
Saiida
Fort Lauderdale
Temple Terrace
Brunswick
Waterloo
Lemhi County
Triumph
Beckemeyer
DePue
Sauget
Uestville
East Chicago
DeSoto
Lake Charles
Bossier City
Bossier
Pittsfield
Odenton
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
September 1997
St
Site Name
Location
Notes
MI
MS
MT
NJ
NM
OB
OK
OR
TN
TZ
General Super-fund Sites
Bay City Niddlegrounds
Federal Facility Sites
Wurtsmith Air Force Base
1 General Super-fund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2
General Super-fund Sites
Chemfax, Inc.
Potter Co.
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
General Superfund Sites
Burlington Northern Livingston Complex
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
Cornell DubUier Electronics Inc
LCP Chemicals Inc
Puchack Well Field
Zschiegner Refining
4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility
General Superfund Sites
Rincnem Co., Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility
General Superfund Sites
Cross County Sanitation Landfill
Fulton Avenue
Peter Cooper
3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility
General Superfund Sites
Diamond Shamrock Corp(Painesvilie Works)
Dover Chemical Corp.
Federal Facility Sites
Air Force Plant 85
Rickenbacker Air National Guard (USAF)
2 General Superfund Sites > 2 Federal Facility
General Superfund Sites
National Zinc Corp.
1 General Superfund-Sites + 0 Federal Facility
General Superfund Sites
East Multnonah County Ground Wtr Contam.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility
General Superfund Sites
East Tenth Street
Salford Quarry
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility
General Superfund Sites
American Bemberg Plant
Federal Facility Sites
Arnold Engineering Develop. Ctr. (USAF)
1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility
General Superfund Sites
Tex-Tin Corp
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility
Sites = 4
Sites = 1
Sites = 3
Sites = 4
Sites = 1
Sites = 1
Sites = 2
Sites = 2
Sites = 1
Bay City
losco County
Gulfport
Uesson
Livingston
South Plainfield
Linden
Pemsauken Township
HoweII Township
Albuquerque
Patterson
North Hempstead
Gowanda
Painesville
Dover
Columbus
Lockbourne
Bartlesvilie
Multnonah County
Marcus Hook
Lower Salford Townshi
Elizabethton
Tullahoma/Manchester
Texas City
15
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
, September 1997
St
Site Na
Location
Notes"
ur General Super-fund Sites
Kermecott (North Zone) Magna
Kennecott (South Zone) Copperton
Hurray Smelter Murray City
Richardson Flat Tailings Summit County
4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4
uv General Superfund Sites
Hani in-Allied-Olin Moundsville
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
46 General Superfund Sites + 6 Federal Facility Sites = 52
aA = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(if scored, HRS score need not be > 28.50).
S = State top priority (included among the 100 top priority sites regardless of score).
16
-------
Sites Deleted From the NPL
September 1997
st
AK
AL
AR
AS
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CM
CO
CO
CT
CT
DE
DE
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
IA
IA
IA
IA
Site Name
Alaska Battery Enterprises
Mowbray Engineering Co.
Cecil Lindsey
Taputimu Farm
Mountain View Mobile Home Estates
Jibboom Junkyard
Liquid Gold Oil Corp.
Louisiana-Pacific Corp.
PCB Warehouse
Sand Creek Industrial
Uoodbury Chemical Co.
Cheshire Ground Water Contamination
Revere Textile Prints Corp.
New Castle Spill
New Castle Steel
Sea land Limited
Alpha Chemical Corp.
Brown Wood Preserving
Gold Coast Oil Corp.
Northwest 58th Street Landfill
Parramore Surplus
Pioneer Sand Co.
Tri-City Oil Conservationist, Inc
Varsol Spill
Wilson Concepts of Florida, Inc.
Uoodbury Chemical Co. (Princeton Plant)
Luminous Processes, Inc.
Aidex Corp.
E.I. Du Pont de Nemours (County Rd X23)
LaBounty Site
Northwestern States Portland Cement Co.
Location
Fairbanks N Star Borough
Greenville
Newport
Island of Tutila
Globe
Sacramento
Richmond
Oroville
Sai.pan
Commerce City
Commerce City
Cheshire
Sterling
New Castle County
New Castle County
Mount Pleasant
Galloway
Live Oak
Miami
Hialeah
Mount Pleasant
Warrington
Tampa
Miami
Pompano Beach
Princeton
Athens
Council Bluffs
West Point
Charles City
Mason City
Date
Deleted
07/26/96
12/30/93
09/22/89
03/07/86
04/18/88
09/10/91
09/11/96
11/21/96
03/07/86
12/20/96
03/22/93
07/02/97
09/02/94
06/12/96
03/17/89
07/01/97
06/28/95
09/22/95
10/09/96
10/11/96
02/21/89
02/08/93
09/01/88
09/01/88
04/04/95
11/27/95
12/30/82
10/21/93
09/25/95
10/06/93
08/31/95
17
-------
Sites Deleted From the NPL
i September 1997
st
ID
IL
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KY
KY
KY
KY
MA
MO
MD
Ml
HI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
Site Name
Arrcom (Drexler Enterprises)
Petersen Sand & Gravel
Carter Lee Lumber Co.
International Minerals (E. Plant)
Poer Farm
Souths ide Sanitary Landfill
Tri -State Plating
Uedzeb Enterprises, Inc.
Uhiteford Sales & Service/Natipnalease
29th & Mead Ground Water Contamination
Arkansas City Dump
Big River Sand Co.
Hydro-Flex Inc.
Johns' Sludge Pond
A.L. Taylor (Valley of Drums)
Howe Valley Landfill
Lee's Lane Landfill
Newport Dump
Plymouth Harbor/Cannon Engineering Corp.
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc.
Middletown Road Dump .
Anderson Development Co.
Carter Industrials, Inc.
Cemetery Dump
Charlevoix Municipal Well
Folkertsma Refuse
Gratiot County Golf Course
Kent City Mobile Home Park
Metal Working Shop
Ossineke Ground Water Contamination
Whitehall Municipal Wells
Location
Rathdrum
Libertyville
Indianapolis
Terre Haute
Hancock County
Indianapolis
Columbus
Lebanon
South Bend
Wichita
Arkansas City
Wichita
Topeka
Wichita
Brooks
Howe Valley
Louisville
Newport
Plymouth
Baltimore
Annapolis
Adrian
Detroit
Rose Center
Charlevoix
Grand Rapids
St. Louis
Kent City
Lake Ann
Ossineke
Whitehall
Date
Deleted
12/23/92
02/11/91
07/09/96
02/11/91
02/11/91
07/03/97
07/14/97
09/10/91
09/06/96
04/29/96
03/01/96
10/14/92
11/09/93
01/06/92
05/17/96
07/26/96
04/25/96
06/03/96
11/19/93
12/30/82
04/18/88
01/26/96
03/25/97
04/19/95
12/02/93
04/10/96
09/08/83
03/20/95
1 . 12/23/92
01/31/96
02/11/91
18
-------
Sites Deleted From the UPL
September 1997
st
MN
MN
MN
HN
MN
HN
HN
HN
HN
HN
HN
HN
HN
MN
HN
MO
MS
MS
NC
NO
ND
NJ
NJ~
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
Site Name
Adrian Municipal Well Field
Agate Lake Scrapyard
Boise Cascade/Onan Corp. /Medtronics, Inc.
Dakhue Sanitary Landfill
East Bethel Demolition Landfill
Koch Refining Co. /N- Ren Corp.
Kuimer Sanitary Landfill
Morris Arsenic Dump
Oak Grove Sanitary Landfill
Olmsted County Sanitary Landfill
St. Augusta Sanitary Landf ill/Engen Dump
Twin Cities Air Force BaseCSAR Landfill)
Union Scrap Iron & Hetal Co.
Washington County Landfill
Waste Disposal Engineering
North-U Drive Well Contamination
Flouood Site
Walcotte Chemical Co. Warehouses
PCS Spills
Arsenic Trioxide Site
Mi not Landfill
Beachwood/Berkley Wells
Cooper Road
Friedman Property
Jackson Township Landfill
Krysowaty Farm
H&T Delisa Landfill
Monroe Township Landfill
Pijak Farm
Ringwood Mines/Landfill
Spence Farm
Location
Adrian
Fairview Township
Fridley
Cannon Falls
East Bethel Township
Pine Bend
Bemidji
Morris
Oak Grove Township
Oronoco
St. Augusta Township
Minneapolis
Minneapolis
Lake Elmo
Andover
Springfield
Flowood
Greenville
243 Miles of Roads
Southeastern ND
Mi not
Berkley Township
Voorhees Township
Upper Freehold Twp
Jackson Township
Hillsborough
Asbury Park
Monroe Township
PI instead Township
Ringwood Borough
PI instead Township
Date
Deleted
12/30/92
08/01/97
02/15/95
07/24/95
05/07/96
06/15/95
04/26/96
03/07/86
10/17/96
02/15/95
11/14/96
12/16/96
09/10/91
05/16/96
06/05/96
09/08/94
02/16/96
12/30/82
03/07/86
07/05/96
04/01/97
01/06/92
02/22/89
03/07/86
09/13/95
02/22/89
' 03/21/91
02/03/94
03/03/97
11/02/94
03/03/97
19
-------
Sites Deleted From the NPL
September 1997
st
NJ
NM
NM
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
OH
OR
OR
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
SC
SO
TN
Site Name
Uitco Chemical Corp. (Oakland Pit)
Cal West Metals (USS8A)
Pagano Salvage
Action Anodizing, Plating, & Polishing
SEC Trucking
BioClinical Laboratories, Inc.
C & J Disposal Leasing Co. Dump
Clothier Disposal
Conklin Dumps
Kenmark Texti le Corp.
Marathon Battery Corp.
Radium Chemical Co., Inc.
Suffern Village Well Field '
Wide Beach Development
Chemical & Minerals Reclamation
Allied Plating,. Inc.
Martin-Marietta Aluminum Co.
AMP, Inc. (Glen Rock Facility)
Ambler Asbestos Piles
Enterprise Avenue
Lansdoune Radiation Site
Lehign Electric & Engineering Co.
Middletown Air Field
Presque Isle
Reeser's Landfill
Voortman Farm
Wade (ABM)
West line Site
Independent Nail Co.
Uhitewood Creek
Amnicola Dump
Location
Oakland
Lemi tar
Los tunas
Copiague
Town of Vestal
Bohemia
Hami I ton
Town of Granby
Conklin
Farmingdale
Cold Springs
New York City
Village of Suffern
Brant
Cleveland
Portland
The Dalies
Glen Rock
Ambler
Philadelphia
Lansdoune
Old Forge Borough
Middletown
Erie
Upper Macungie Tup
Upper. Saucon Tup
Chester
West line
Beaufort
Uhitewood
Chattanooga
Date
Deleted
09/29/95
12/20/96
10/14/92
09/29/95
10/14/92
09/09/94
09/20/94
02/08/96
04/25/97
05/01/95
10/18/96
03/24/95
05/28/93
08/30/94
12/30/82
11/14/94
07/05/96
10/02/96
12/27/96
03/07/86
09/10/91
03/07/86
07/10/97
02/13/89
05/31/90
05/31/89
03/23/89
10/14/92
04/03/95
08/13/96
04/30/96
20
-------
Sites Deleted From the NPL
, September 1997
st
TN
TN
TN
TT
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
VA
VA
WA
UA
WA
UA
UA
UA
UA
UA
UA
UA
UI
UI
UV
Site Name
Chemet Co.
Gal laway 'Pits
Lewisburg Dump
PCB Uastes
Bio-Ecology Systems, Inc.
Crystal City Airport
Harris (Farley Street)
Pesses Chemical Co.
Stewco, Inc.
Triangle Chemical Co.
Matthews Electroplating
Suffolk City Landfill
ALCOA (Vancouver Smelter)
Bomeville Power Admin Ross (USDOE)
Fort Lewis (Landfill No. 5)
Hamilton Island Landf ill(USA/COE)
Hanford 11 00- Area (USDOE)
McChord Air Force Base (Uash Rack/Treat)
Naval Air Station, Uhidbey Is (Seaplane)
Pesticide Lab (Yakima)
Toftdahl Drums
Yakima Plating Co. .
Omega Hills North- Landf ill
Uaste Research & Reclamation Co.
Leetown Pesticide
Location
Moscow
Gal I away
Lewisburg
Pacific Trust Terr
Grand Prairie
Crystal City
Houston
Fort Uorth
Uaskom
Bridge City
Roanoke County
Suffolk
Vancouver
Vancouver
Tacoma
North Bormeville
Benton County
Tacoma
, Uhidbey Island
Yakima
Brush Prairie
Yakima
Germantown
Eau Claire
Leetown
Date
Deleted
10/09/96
04/29/96
02/21/96
03/07/86
08/05/96
03/23/95
04/18/88
09/28/95
10/04/95
04/08/97
01/19/89
01/24/95
09/30/96
09/23/96
05/22/95
05/25/95
09/30/96
09/26/96
09/21/95
09/01/93
12/23/88
08/23/94
12/11/96
02/05/93
08/29/96
Number of sites deleted: 149
21
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites Per State/Territory
(by Proposed Rule #23)
September 1997
Proposed Rule #23
State/Territory
New Jersey
New York
Indiana
Massachusetts
Tennessee
Alabama
Alaska
American Samoa.
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Commonwealth of Marianas
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Mexico
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Texas
Trust Territories
Utah
Vermont
Virgin 'Islands
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Total
Gen
4
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
d.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
Fed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
Total Proposed
Gen
4
3
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0 '
3
2
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
2
3
1
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
46
Fed
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
Total
Gen
100
73
28
22
11
9
1
0
. 7
12
68
12
0
13
16
0
46
13
1
1
6
34
15
9
15
14
9
10
72
27
1
19
8
9
1
17
8
21
0
31
9
8
93
9
10
24
1
22
0
8
8
2
18
36
4
40
2
1053
Final
. Fed
6
4
0
8
3
3
6
0
3
0
23
3
0
1
1
0
6
2
1
3
2
4
1
1
1
1
3
5
0
2
0
3
0
1
0
1
1
2
0
3
1
2
6
1
2
2
1
4
0
4
0
0
7
14
2
0
1
151
Total
110
80
30
31
16
13
7
0
10
12
94
17
0
14
17
0
54
16
2
4
- 10
41
17
11
16
18
12
16
74
29
3
22
9
10
1
18
10
23
0
38
11
11
101
10
12
26
2
27
0
16
8
2
25
50
7
40
3
1256
-------
National Priorities List
General Superfine) Section, Proposed Rule #23 Scores
. September 1997
5t
IN
4A
HJ
4J
«J
4J
HY
HY
TN
Site Name
Cam-On Inc
GE - Housa tonic River
Cornell Dubilier Electronics Inc
LCP Chemicals Inc
Puchack Well Field
Zschiegner Refining
Fulton Avenue
Peter Cooper
American Bemberg Plant
Number of Sites Being Proposed to the General
Location
Westville
Pittsfield
South Plainfield
Linden
Pennsauken Township
Howe 1 1 Township
North Hempstead
Gowanda
Elizabeth ton
Superfund Section: 9
GW
62.29
NS
10.46
NS
100.00
NS
66.15
NS
NS
Route
SW
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
NS
100.00
NS
100.00
100.00
Scores
SE
NS
100.00
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Air
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Ci ^a
o i re
Score Notes
58.91
70.71
50.27
50.00
50.00
50.00
33.08
50.00
50.00
A = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(if scored, HRS score need not be > 28.50).
S = State top priority (included among the 100 top priority sites regardless of score).
NS = Pathway Not Scored
23
-------
National Priorities List
General Super-fund Section, Final Rule Scores
' September 1997
st
CA
HD
MD
NJ
TX
WA
Site Name
Del Amo
Central Chemical (Hagerstown)
Ordnance Products, Inc.
Grand Street Mercury
Sprague Road Ground Water Plume
Oeser Co
Number, of Sites Being Promulgated to the General
Location
Los Angeles
Hagerstown
Ceci I County
Hobokeh
Odessa
Bellingham
Superfund Section: 6
GU
63.42
NS
62.02
NS
86.42
NS
Route
SU
NS
100.00
16.95
NS
NS
96.07
Scores
SE
NS
NS
. NS
NS
NS
NS
Air
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
100.00
Site
Score Notes
31.71
50.00
32.15
0.00 A
43.21
69.34
aA = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(if scored, MRS score need not be > 28.50).
S = State top priority (included among the 100 top priority sites regardless of score).
NS = Pathway Not Scored
24
-------
Federal Register Notices
Date Rule Type Action
FR Notice
Oct-23-81 N/A Interim Priorities List (IPL) 115 sites
proposed
Jul-23-82 N/A Expanded Eligibility List (EEL) 45
sites added; no notice published
Dec-30-82 Proposal 418 sites (including 153 from the
47 FR 58476 IPL and EEL); Deleted 4 proposed
sites: Removed 1 federal site
Mar-04-83 Proposal 1 site proposed; Times Beach
48 FR 9311
Sep-08-83 Final Promulgation of first NPL; 406
48 FR 40658 finalized, 1 proposed site split into 2
sites; Deleted 1 proposed site and
Removed 6 proposed sites
Proposal 1 133 sites proposed
48 FR 40674
May-08-84 Final 4 San Gabriel sites finalized
49 FR 19480
Sep-21-84 Final 128 sites finalized and 4 proposed
49 FR 37070 sites removed
Oct-15-84 Proposal 2 244 total sites; 208 general and 36
49 FR 40320 federal
Feb- 14-85 Final 2 sites; Glen Ridge and
50 FR 6320 Montclair/West Orange, NJ
Apr-10-85 Proposal 3 32 total sites; 26 general and 6
50 FR 14115 federal
Sep- 16-85 Final 1 site; Lansdowne Radiation, PA
50 FR 37630
Sep- 18-85 Proposal 4 41 total sites; 38 general and 3
50 FR 37950 federal
Proposed Sites
Gen Fed
115
160
418
419
140
136-
4
212 36
210 36
236 42
235 42
273 45
total
419
140
136
4
248
246
278
277
318
Final Sites
Gen Fed
410
538
538
540
540
541
541
Total
406
410
538
538
540
540
541
541
25
-------
Date Rule Type Action
FR Notice
Jun-10-86 Final 170 general sites; Deleted 8 NPL
51 FR 21054 sites since last rule
51 FR 21064 Removed 7 proposed sites
Proposal 5 45 total sites; 43 general and 2
51 FR 21099 federal
51 FR 21 109 5 RCRA sites reopened for
comments
Oct- 17-86 Removal Removed Silver Creek Tailings from
proposal
Jan-22-87 Proposal 6 64 total sites; 63 general and 1
52 FR 2492 federal
Feb-25-87 52 FR 5578 Notice of Availability
May-13-87 52 FR 17991 Proposed RCRA Policy Statements
Jul-22-87 Final 99 total sites; 67 general and 32
52 FR 27620 federal
52 FR 27643 7 federal sites reproposed (no change
in numbers)
Jun-24-88 53 FR 23978 13 sites reproposed (no change in
numbers); Deleted 3 general NPL
sites since last rule
Proposal 7 229 total sites; 215 general and 14
53 FR 23988 federal
Aug-09-88 53 FR 30002 Notice of Availability; RCRA policy
and 30005 statements
Mar-13-89 Final 8 federal sites; Reclassified 1 general
54 FR 10512 NPL site as a federal site; Deleted 8
general NPL sites since last rule
Mar-31-89 Final 93 general sites finalized; Removed
. 54 FR 13296 4 general proposed sites and Deleted
2 general NPL sites since last rule
May-5-89 Proposal 8 10 general sites
54 FR 19526
Jul- 14-89 Proposal 9 52 federal sites; Deleted 1 general
54 FR 29820 NPL site since last rule
Aug- 16-89 Proposal 2 ATSDR sites
54 FR 33846
Proposed Sites
Gen Fed
143 47
137 47
200 48
Total
190
184
248
133 16
348 30
149
378
348 22
251 22
261 22
261 74
263 74
370
273
283
335
337
final Sites
Gen Fed
703
703
703
Total
703
703
703
770 32
767 32'
802
799
758 41
849 41
849 41
848 41
848 41
799
890
890
889
889
26
-------
Date Rule Type Action
FR Notice
Oct-4-89 Final 23 general sites; Removed 27
54 FR 41000 proposed RCRA sites; Deleted 1
general NPL site since last rule
Final 70 total sites; 59 general and 1 1
54 FR 41015 federal; Removed 4 general proposed
sites
Oct-26-89 Proposal 10 25 total sites; 23 general and 2
54 FR 43778 federal; last proposed rule under the
original HRS
Nov-21-89 Final 29 total sites; 2 general ATSDR and
54 FR 48184 27 federal
Feb-21-90 Final 71 total sites; 57 general and 14
55 FR 6154 federal; Removed 1 general proposed
site
Mar- 14-90 Final 1 general site; United Heckathorn
55 FR 9688 Co, Richmond, CA
Aug-30-90 Final 106 total sites; 83 general and 23
55 FR 35502 federal; Removed 9 general and 1
federal proposed sites; Deleted 1
general NPL site since last rule
Feb-1 1-91 Final Last final rule under original HRS -
56 FR 5598 6 general sites; Deleted 4 general
NPL sites; Removed 8 general
proposed sites; No decision on 6
proposed sites
May-9-91 Proposal 1 general ATSDR site; Deleted 1
56 FR 21460 general NPL site since last rule
Jul-29-91 Proposal 22 general sites; First proposed rule
56 FR 35840 under Revised HRS
Sep-25-91 Final 1 general ATSDR site; Deleted 4
56 FR 48438 general NPL sites since last rule
Feb-7-92 Proposal 12 30 total sites; 24 general and 6
57 FR 4824 federal; Deleted 2 general NPL sites
since last rule
Oct- 14-92 Final 33 total sites; 26 general and 7
57 FR 47181 federal; Deleted 4 general NPL sites
since last rule
Proposal 13 9 total sites; 8 general and 1 federal
57 FR 47204
Proposed Sites
Gen Fed
150 63
173 65
171 38
113 24
112 24
20 0.00
0.00 0.00
1 0.00
23 0.00
22 0.00
46 6
25 3
Total
213
238
209
137
136
20
0.00
1
23
22
52
28
Final Sites
Gen Fed
929 52
929 52
931 79
988 93
989 93
1,071 116
1,073 116
1,072 116
1,072 116
1,069 116
1,067 116
1,085 123
Total
981
981
1,010
1,081
1,082
1,187
1,189
1,188
1,188
1,185
1,183
1,208
27
-------
Date Rule Type Action
FR Notice
May-10-93 Proposal 14 26 total sites; 19 general and 7
58 FR 27507 federal; Withdrew 5 NPL sites;
Deleted 6 general NPL sites since
last rule
Jun-23-93 Proposal 15 17 total sites; 7 general and 10
58 FR 34018 federal; Deleted 1 general NPL site
since last rule; Withdrew 2 general
NPL sites
Jan- 18-94 Proposal 16 26 total sites; 16 general and 10
59 FR 2568 federal; Deleted 7 general NPL sites
since last rule; Withdrew 2 general
NPL sites
Feb-23-94 Final 1 general site (Alcoa/Point
59 FR 8724 Comfort); Withdrew 1 general NPL
site; Deleted 1 general site
May-31-94 Filial 42 total sites; 18 general and 24
59 FR 27989 federal; Reclassified 3 general sites
as federal sites
Aug-23-94 Proposal 17 10 total sites; 6 general and 4
59 FR 43314 federal; Deleted 1 general NPL site
since last rule
Dec-16-94 Final 18 total sites; 14 general and 4
59 FR 65206 federal; Deleted 6 general NPL sites
since last rule
Feb-13-95 Proposal 18 9 total sites; 7 general and 2 federal;
60 FR 8212 Deleted 1 general NPL site since last
rule
Apr-25-95 Final 4 total sites; 3 general and 1 federal;
60 FR 20330 Deleted 8 general NPL sites since
last rule
May -26-95 Final 1 general site (Southern
60 FR 278% Shipbuilding); Deleted 1 general and
2 federal NPL sites since last rule;
Removed 1 proposed site since last
rule
Sep-29-95 Final 8 total sites; 6 general and 2 federal;
60 FR 50435 Deleted 10 general and 1 federal
NPL sites since last rule
Oct-2-95 Proposal 19 12 general sites; Removed 1
^OFR51390 proposed site
Proposed Sites
Gen Fed
44 10
51 20
67 30
66 30
48 6
54 10
40 6
47 8
44 7
42 7
36 5
47 5
Total
54
71
97
%
54
64
46
55
51
49
41
52
Final Sites
Gen Fed
1,078 123
1,075 123
1,067 123
1,067 ' 123
1,082 150
1,081 150
1,088 154
1,087 154
1,082 155
1,082 153
1,078 154
1,078- 154
Total
.1,201
1,198
1,190
1,190
1,232
1,231
1,242
1,241
1,237
1,235
1,232
1,232
28
-------
Date Rule Type Action
FR Notice
June-17^96 Final 13 total sites; all general; Deleted 18
61 FR 30510 sites since last rule
Proposal 20 15 total sites; 13 general (2 general
61 FR 30575 sites are reproposed) and 2 federal
Dec-23-96 Final 7 total sites; all general
61 FR 67656
Proposal 21 5 total sites; all general; Removed 1
61 FR 67678 proposed site
Apr- 1-97 Final 5 total sites; 3 general and 2 federal
62 FR 15572
Proposal 22 6 total sites; 5 general and 1 federal;
62 FR 15594 Removed 1 proposed site
Aug-21-97 62 FR 44430 Proposed Amendment of Montrose
Chemical Corporation
Sept-97 Final 6 total sites; all general
Proposal 23 9 total sites; all general
Proposed Sites
Gen Fed
45 7
42 7
43 6
45 7
Total
52
49
49
52 '
Final Sites
Gen Fed
1,073 154
1,059 151
1,057 151
1,053 151
Total
1,227
1,210
1,208
1,204
29
-------
United States Environmental Protection Agency
For further information, call the Supertax! Hotline, toll-free 1-&00-
424-934* or (703)412-9810 in Washington, DC metropolitan area.
or the U.S. EPA Superfund Regional Offices listed below*.
For publications, contact EPA Superfund Docket at (703) 603-8917
SUPERFUND.DOCKET@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV
by Mail:
EPA Superfund Docket (5201G)
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Walk-in Address (by Appt.):
EPA Superfund Docket
123S Jefferson Davis Highway
Crystal Gateway #1,1 stFloor
Arlington, Virginia
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
(5204G)
United States Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
(703)603-8860
Region 1
Connecticut
Maine
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont
Waste Management Division. HAA-CAN-1
John F. Kennedy Federal Building
Boston. MA 02203-2211
(617)573-5707
Region 2
New Jersey.
Puerto Rico
Emergency and Remedial Response Division
290 Broadway, 19th ROOT
New York. NY 10007-1866
(2121637-4390
Region 3
Delaware
District of Columbia
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
Site Assessment Section, 3HV, 33
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
ai5>S66-3033
Region 4
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
..Kentucky.
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Waste Management Division
100 Alabama Street, SW
Atlanta, GA 30303
(404) 562-8651
Regions
Illinois
Indiana
.Michiean____
Minnesota
Ohio
Wisconsin,
Waste Management Division
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 6th Floor
Chicago. IL 60604
(312) 886-7570
Region 6
Arkansas
f xwisiana
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Texas
Hazardous Waste Management Division, 6H-M
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 76202-2733
(214)665^740
Region?
Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska
Waste Management Division
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City. KS 66101
551-7062 or 351-7595
Regions
Colorado
Momma
South Dakota
Utah
Hazardous Waste Management Division, 8HWM-SR
999 18th Street, Suite 500
Denver. CO 80202-2466
(303)294.7630
Region 9
American
Arizona
California
Guam
Hawaii
Nevada
Northern
Trust Territories
Waste Management Division. H-l
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
(4151744-1730
Region 10
Alaska
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
Hazardous Waste Division, HW-113
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101 '
(2021553-1677
* All EPA telephone and telecommunications systems may be
accessed via the Federal Telecommunications System (FTS).
------- |