United States
                  Environmental Protection
                  Agency            	
                                          Office of
                                          Solid Waste and
                                          Emergency Response
Publication 9320.7-071
September 1997
                  Descriptions  of  Six  Final
                  Sites Added  to the  National
                  Priorities  List in  September  1997
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
State & Site Identification Center (5204G) ^
                                                                      Intermittent Bulletin
                                                                     yVolume 4, Number 2
     This document consists of descriptions of the six final sites added to the National Priorities List (NPL) in September
1997. The size of the site is generally indicated, based on information available at the time the site was scored using the
Hazard Ranking System (HRS) or nominated using ATSDR health advisory criteria. The size may change as additional
information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. Sites are arranged alphabetically by site name.
CLEANING UP UNDER SUPERFUND

   The Superfund program is managed by the U.S.
Environmental  Protection Agency  (EPA).    It  is
authorized  by  the  Comprehensive  Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA),
enacted on December 11, 1980,  as amended by the
Superfund  Amendments  and  Reauthorization  Act
(SARA), enacted on October 17, 1986. In October 1990,
SARA  was extended to September 30,  1994.   An
appropriation  by Congress  for  Fiscal  Year  1995
authorized Superfund to continue to  operate.  The
Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund set up by
CERCLA as amended pays the costs not assumed by
responsible parties for cleaning up hazardous waste sites
or emergencies that threaten public health, welfare, or the
environment;   Superfund also pays  for overseeing
responsible parties conducting cleanup.

   Two types  of responses may be  taken when a
hazardous substance  is released,  or threatens to be
released, into the environment:

   •  Removal actions — emergency-type responses to
      imminent threats. SARA limits these actions to
      1 year and/or $2 million, with a waiver possible if
      the actions are consistent with remedial
                                                     responses. Removal actions can be undertaken by
                                                     the private parties responsible for the releases or
                                                     by the Federal government using the Superfund.

                                                  •  Remedial responses  - actions intended to
                                                     provide permanent solutions at uncontrolled
                                                     hazardous waste sites. Remedial responses are
                                                     generally longer-term  and more expensive than
                                                     removals.    A  Superfund-financ sd remedial
                                                     response can be taken only if a site is on the NPL.
                                                     EPA published the first NPL in September 1983.
                                                     The list must be updated at least annually.

                                                     EPA's goals for the Superfund program are to:

                                                  •  Ensure that polluters pay to clean up the problems
                                                     they created; and

                                                  *  Work  first on the worst problems at the worst
                                                     sites, by making sites safe, making sites clean, and
                                                     bringing new technology to bear on the problem.

-------
REMEDIAL RESPONSES

   The money for conducting a remedial response at a
hazardous waste site and a removal action, as well, can
come from several sources:

   •  The individuals or companies responsible for the
      problems can clean up voluntarily with EPA or
      State supervision, or they can be forced to clean
      up by Federal or State legal action.

   •  A State or local government can choose to assume
      the  responsibility to clean up  without Federal
      dollars.

   •  Superfund can pay for the cleanup, then seek to
      recover the costs from the responsible party or
      parties.

   A remedial response,  as  defined  by the  National
Contingency Plan, the  Federal  regulation by  which
Superfund  is implemented, is  an orderly process that
generally involves the following steps:

   •  Take any measures needed to stabilize conditions,
      which might involve, for example, fencing the site
      or removing above-ground drums or bulk tanks.

   •  Undertake initial planning activities to  scope out a
      strategy for collecting information and analyzing
      alternative cleanup approaches.

   •  Conduct a remedial investigation to. characterize
      the type and extent of contamination at the site and
      to assess the risks posed by that contamination.

   •  Conduct a  feasibility study  to  analyze various
      cleanup alternatives.  The feasibility study is often
      conducted  concurrently   with  the  remedial
       investigation as one project.  Typically, the two
      together take from  18 to 24 months to complete
       and cost approximately $1.3 million.

   •   Select the cleanup alternative that:

       -   Protects human health and the environment;

       -   Complies    with   Federal   and    State
           requirements that are  applicable or relevant
           and appropriate;
      -  Uses  permanent  solutions and  alternative
          treatment technologies or resource recovery
          technology   to  the   maximum   extent
          practicable;

      --  Considers views of the State and public; and

      -  Is "cost effective" — that is, affords results
          proportional to the costs of the remedy.

   •  Design the remedy. Typically, the design phase
      takes 6 to  12 months  to complete  and costs
      approximately $1.5 million.

   •  Implement the remedy, which might involve, for
      example,  constructing facilities to treat ground
      water or removing contaminants to a safe disposal
      area away from the site.

   EPA expects the implementation (remedial  action)
phase to average out at about $25 million per site (plus
any costs to operate and maintain the action), and some
remedial actions may take several years to complete.

   The State government can participate in a remedial
response under Superfund in  one of two ways:

   •  The  State  can  take the lead  role under  a
      cooperative agreement, which is much like a grant
      in that Federal dollars are transferred to the State.
      The State then develops a workplan, schedule, and-
      budget, contracts for any services it needs, and is
      responsible for making sure that all the conditions
       in the cooperative agreement are met.  In contrast
       to  a grant,  EPA continues  to be  substantially
       involved  and  monitors  the  State's progress
       throughout the project.

    •   EPA can take the lead  under a Superfund State
       Contract, with the State's role outlined.  EPA,
       generally using contractor support, manages work
       early in the planning process.  In the later design
       and implementation phases, contractors do  the
       work under the  supervision of the U.S. Army
       Corps of Engineers.  Under both arrangements,
       the  State  must share  in the  cost   of  the
       implementation phase of cleanup.

    CERCLA requires that EPA select the remedy.

-------
                      National Priorities List Final Rule #19
                              Narrative Summaries
Site Name and Location

Central Chemical (Hagerstown), Hagerstown, Maryland

Del Amo, Los Angeles, California

Grand Street Mercury, Hoboken, New Jersey

Oeser Co, Bellingham, Washington

Ordnance Products, Inc., Cecil County, Maryland

Sprague Road Ground Water Plume, Odessa, Texas
                                         .3

-------
 xvEPA
                          UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL PRIORITIES  LIST (NPL)
 September 1997
CSWER/OERR
        State, Tribal, and Site Identification Center
Washington, DC 20460
                                                            CENTRAL CHEMICAL (HAGERSTOWN)
                                                                               Hagerstown, Maryland

        Conditions at Proposal (June 19%): Central Chemical blended and produced pesticides and fertilizers at the 19-acre
        site on North Jonathan Street in Hagerstown, Washington County, Maryland from the 1930s until 1968.  Pesticide
        operations ceased in 1968 and the company only produced fertilizer from 1968 until closure in 1984. Currently the
        site is leased for warehousing, auto rebuilding, and other purposes.       .

        The site consists of three sources: an old stone quarry, a sinkhole, and an area of contaminated soil.  Soluble
        materials such as DDT, chlordane, and other pesticides and wastes that became out-of-date or were banned by the
        government were buried in the old stone quarry. Insoluble wastes were buried in trenches or sinkholes throughout
        areas east and northeast of the quarry.  Following the discovery of elevated concentrations of pesticides and heavy
        metals in 1976, the State of Maryland ordered Central Chemical to investigate and stabilize the site.  After complying
        with these orders by'capping the quarry and sinkhole areas with clay and soil and vegetating these areas, the State
        issued a Notice of Compliance to Central Chemical on December 14, 1979.

        After discovering an on-site dump  area during the excavation of a sewer line in 1987, the State began negotiating a
        Consent Order with Central Chemical to clean up the site.  To date, Central Chemical has not signed this order.

        Through, the Cooperative Agreement with EPA, the State conducted an expanded site inspection at Central Chemical
        in May of 1993.  DDT was detected at elevated levels in sediment samples taken from the storm water runoff system
        and Antietam Creek.  Antietam Creek is used for fishing and recreational purposes.  High levels of DDT and other
        pesticides were also detected in soil samples on and near the site.

        Status (September 1997):  EPA has conducted additional sampling at.the site. Central Chemical extended the fence
        to enclose the contaminated area in response to the discovery of contaminated soil outside the former fence line.

        [The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The description
        may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.  See 56 FR 5600,
        February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.]
     Superfund hazardous waste site listed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) as amended

-------
OEPA
                            UNITED  STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL)
 September 1997
 OSWER/OERR
        State, Tribal, and Site Identification Center
Washington, DC 20460
                                                                                                  DEL AMD
                                                                                  Los Angeles, California

        Conditions at Proposal (June 1996): The Del Amo site is located in the city of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County,
        California. From the early 1940s to the early 1970s, a synthetic rubber manufacturing facility operated on site. The
        facility consisted of a butadiene plant, a styrene  plant,  and  a copolymer plant; the butadiene and styrene were
        combined to produce synthetic rubber.  In 1972, the entire 280-acre facility was sold to a land development company.
        The three plants were dismantled and the  site was commercially developed.  Current land use includes light
        industrial/manufacturing and commercial office space.  The Montrose Chemical Corporation site, another EPA
        Superfund site, is located approximately 600 feet west of the Del Amo site.

        A 1993 phase  I remedial investigation identified likely sources  for groundwater contamination in eight  areas.
        However, the Del Amo site consists of one area, Area 8 (Del Amo pit).  This area occupies approximately 4 acres
        in the southern portion of the site  and consists of six disposal pits  and two evaporation ponds.  The pits and ponds
        received process wastes such as sulfur tar oil, acid sludge, clay-like sludge, and propane cracking oils from the styrene
        manufacturing plant.  The pits and ponds are  currently covered with fill material, weeds, and miscellaneous debris,
        and the parcel is surrounded by a double row of fences. The waste remaining in the pits contains hydrocarbons with
        high  polynuclear aromatic and volatile aromatic content, which correlates  with  the chemistry of  the styrene
        manufacturing process wastes.

        Contaminated soil associated with the pits has come to be located below the top of the water table beneath the Del
        • Amo site, due to rising ground water levels.  Soil sampling results indicate that, by 1987, hazardous substances from
        the waste in the pits had migrated to a depth of at least 57 feet belpw ground surface (bgs).  In 1987, the water table
        was first encountered at a depth of 59 feet bgs. In 1993, the  water table had risen to a minimum depth of 40 feet bgs.
        There are 13 municipal drinking water wells within 4 miles of the  Del Amo site.

        Status (September 1997):  The RI/FS  is continuing for ground water.  A joint ground water feasibility study is being
        done  with Montrose. A treatability and modeling study is continuing near well MW-20.  The EPA is planning the
        second phase of the RI, which focusses on soils and surface threats at the site.

        [The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The description
        may change as additional  information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.  See 56 FR 5600,
        February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR  notices.]
      Superfund hazardous waste site listed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) as amended

-------
                           UNITED STATES  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY
&EPA
OSWER/OERR
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL)
        State, Tribal, and Site Identification Center
September 1997
                                                                                               Washington, DC 2046f
                                                                            GRAND STREET MERCURY
                                                                                  Hoboken, New Jersey

        Conditions at Proposal (December 1996): The Grand Street Mercury site is located at 720 and 722-732 Grand
        Street, Hoboken, Hudson County, New Jersey.  The site comprises two buildings, a former industrial building
        converted into 16 residential/studio spaces with the area of each space between 2,600 and 3,500 square feet and a
       ,four story townhouse also slated for residential renovation. The former industrial building is approximately  100
        feet by 150 feet, five stories high and is constructed of brick and masonry with interior wooden structural and
        flooring systems. The townhouse is approximately 25 feet by 40 feet, four stories high and also constructed of
        brick and masonry with wooden structural and flooring systems. The surrounding area is a mix of
        residential/commercial and industrial properties.  Hoboken High School is located across the street to the
        northeast.  More than 40,000 residents live in a one-half mile radius from the site.

        The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), on January 22, 1996, issued a Public Health
        Advisory (PHA) that proclaimed "an imminent public health hazard is posed to residents of 722 Grand Street from
        past,  current and potential future exposures via inhalation, direct dermal contact and possible ingestion of metallic
        (elemental) mercury and mercury vapor." In addition, the PHA states  "the potential exists for mercury-
        contaminated possessions to be taken out  of the building to continue to expose residents of 722 Grand Street,
        contaminate other areas and expose other members of the public."  The PHA recommended that the residents be
        dissociated from mercury exposure in the 722 Grand Street building.

        Elevated concentrations of mercury have  been detected in urine samples from residents. Adverse health effects
        are associated with mercury levels greater than 20 //g/L (micrograms per liter). Mercury concentrations ranged
        from 3 to 102 Mg/L, and 20 samples had  mercury concentrations equal to or  greater than 20 /ug/L.  The elevated
        concentrations of mercury detected ha the residents may be associated with subtle neurological changes and renal
        tubule effects.  A removal action was conducted to dissociate the affected residents  from the metallic mercury and
        mercury vapors, prevent further off-site migration of mercury, and to assess the extent of the mercury
        contamination. All residents had vacated the building by January 11, 1996.

        A mercury contamination study conducted at the site determined that mercury is widespread and remediation for
        residential use is highly unlikely (mercury has been observed in the floor boards^within 13 of 16 residential units
        and concentrations of mercury absorbed into ulterior brick within common areas exceeds 9,100 parts per million).
        The site conditions are a result of a prolific production of  mercury vapor lamps and mercury connector switches,
        over  55 years of operation,  and absorption of mercury into the porous wood and brick comprising the building.
        The extent of mercury contamination coupled with an extremely low residential standard makes cleanup highly
        unlikely.

        Status (September 1997):  EPA completed a Focussed Feasibility  Study in early July 1997, which included a
        technical engineering evaluation and risk assessment, and  released a Proposed Plan for remedial action at the Site
        inviting public comment on the preferred remedy. In mid July 1997, EPA conducted a public meeting to explain
        the remedial alternatives developed, provide rationale for  selection of preferred alternative and answer questions.
        The preferred remedial alternative includes permanent relocation for the displaced site residents; demolition of the
        buildings;  remediation of contaminated site soil; and groundwater investigations. PRPs assumed building
        maintenance and site security activities from EPA hi August 1997.  Dissociated residents of the Site remain in an
        ongoing EPA-administered temporary  relocation program.

        [The description of the site is based on information available at the time the site was scored.  The description may
        change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600,
        February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.}
     Superfund hazardous waste site listed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) as amended

-------
     EPA
                          UNITED  STATES ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY
NATIONAL  PRIORITIES  LIST (NPL)
 September 1997
OSWER/OERR
        State, Tribal, and Site Identification Center
Washinqton, DC 20460
                                                                                               OESERCO
                                                                               Bellingham, Washington
                      •
        Conditions at  Proposal (December 1996):  The Oeser Company site is a wood treating facility located in the
        northwestern portion of the City of Bellingham, Washington.  The facility  comprises approximately 23.5 acres and
        is surrounded by mixed residential and industrial properties.  The terrain at the site is relatively flat, but south of the
        site the terrain drops steeply into a ravine drained by Little Squalicum Creek.  The creek is fed by storm water
        discharges from several outfalls and by ground water and flows approximately 2,100 feet from the Oeser Company
        outfall into Bellingham Bay.

        The Oeser Company has operated  at the site since 1939 and prepares and treats wood poles for utility companies.
        Creosote [which contains semi-volatile organic compounds  (SVOCs)] was used as the chemical treating agent until
        1973.  Pentachlorophenol {PCP) has been used on site since the 1960s in both pressure and thermal treatment.

        An expanded site inspection (ESI) was conducted by Ecology and Environment, Inc., (E & E)  in August/September
        1995 at the request of the EPA.  Sampling and analysis identified five sources of contamination at the site:  the PCP
        treatment system, the retort drip pad, the treated pole drying  areas, gravel filtration beds, and contaminated soil.  An
        observed release to air of several VOCs and SVOCs including PCP was established with ESI air samples collected
        August 30 and 31, 1996 and September 6, 7,  and  8,  1996.  Levels of 1-methyl-benzene, ethyl benzene, and
        naphthalene were above health based benchmarks. An observed release to Little Squalicum Creek of PCP and several
        other SVOCs was established with  sediment and/or surface water samples.

        Little Squalicum Creek is considered a fishery by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife; however,
        fish can no longer survive in the creek due to contamination present.  Bellingham Bay and Puget Sound support large
        commercial, recreational, and tribal fisheries.  The peregrine falcon, the bald eagle, and numerous wetlands are also
        in the vicinity of the site.

        EPA is considering various alternatives for the site.

        Status (September 1997):  An EPA Removal Assessment was conducted in January, February, and in April 1997.
        Significant levels of PCP and PAHs were detected in surface and subsurface soil, in shallow ground water, and hi a
        deep aquifer. The assessment also revealed elevated levels of dioxins in surface soil. Inability to reach agreement
        on the scope of removal actions resulted in EPA issuing a Unilateral Administrative Order (UAO) to the Company
        to conduct the  work EFA has determined necessary to abate immediate  health  threats.  Work  is expected to be
        underway by September, 1997.

        [The description of the site is based on information available at the time the site was scored.  The description may
        change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.   See 56 FR 5600,  February
        11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.]
     Superfund hazardous waste site listed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) as amended

-------
                           UNITED STATES  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                              NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL)
                                                          September 199 j
OSWER/OERR
State, Tribal, and Site Identification Center
Washinqton, DC 20460
                                                                         ORDNANCE PRODUCTS, INC.
                                                                                 Cecil County, Maryland
                                                                                               j*
        Conditions at Proposal (May 1993):  The Ordnance Products, Inc. (OPI), site is. located 2 miles northeast of the
        Town of North East in Cecil County, Maryland. The 94.6-acre property, currently occupied by an industrial park
        and warehousing facility known as Mechanics Valley  Trade Center (MVTC), is located in a rural area.   OPI
        purchased the property in 1960 and began operating an ordnance manufacturing facility. During the Vietnam conflict,
        OPI manufactured grenade fuses,, detonation devices, smoke grenades, and other types of ordnance.  Some :off-
        specification ordnance  was burned  hi open pits and ordnance was buried onsite.  The waste water resulting from
        manufacturing operations was disposed of into five unlined surface impoundments.  Kraus Design, Inc. (KDl) became
        a holding company for OPI in 1969. OPI ceased manufacturing ordnance in 1972 and closed the facility.  In  1986,
        the site was purchased by MVTC, which planned to develop the site as an industrial park. Since that time MVTC,
        and the site were sold but retained the MVTC corporate entity.  MVTC  is currently, renting buildings in a secure
        portion of the site to several tenants.

        In  1987, the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) discovered the site while investigating a nearby
        property. An extensive MDE sampling program detected elevated levels of metals such as selenium and barium in
        onsite soils, ground water,  and surface water.  MDE also detected elevated concentrations of trichloroethene; 1,2-
        dichloroethene; tetrachloroethene;, vinyl chloride; and xylene in two onsite wells and four offsite residential drinking
        water wells. One onsite well is currently connected to an air stripping tower and is still used as a water source.

        On June 27, 1988, EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order under CERCLA Section 106(a) requiring KDI to
        investigate the extent of soil contamination and the amount of buried ordnance onsite.  The order requires KDI  to (1)
        remove all contaminated soils and buried ordnance from the site, (2) determine the extent the contaminated ground
        water plume has migrated both on- and offsite, and (3) install a water treatment system on all residential wells where
        concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have exceeded EPA's Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs).
        In response, KDI has (1) installed 10 offsite ground water monitoring wells to facilitate the offsite hydrogeological
        study, (2) installed activated carbon filtration units on four residential drinking water wells, and is maintaining the
        units and sampling the wells every 6 weeks, and (3) removed some drums and ordnance that had been buried onsite.

        KDI's investigation identified the following hazardous waste sources, some of which KDI has already removed  under
        the order:  drums scattered over the site, five surface impoundments reportedly used for disposal of plating wastes
        and other wastes,  three subsurface disposal areas.containing discarded ordnance, three burn areas also containing
        ordnance, and other areas of contaminated soil. KDI is continuing to evaluate these sources and also plans to sample
        water and sediments of Little Northeast Creek,, which is adjacent to the site.
                                                                                                          *
        On December 31, 1988, EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order to MVTC  requiring MVTC to maintain site
        security and to operate and maintain the onsite air stripper.  KDI is continuing to remove all contaminated materials
        from the site and the offsite hydrogeological investigation.

        Status  (September 1997):  KDI conducted additional investigations of the sources, ground water,  and surface water.
        KDI Installed additional monitoring wells  and also designed and installed a ground water treatment and recovery
        system.  Due  to  financial difficulties, KDI  has now been liquidated and  is unable to perform any .additional
        investigation or remediation at the site. EPA's Removal  Program anticipates beginning operation of the ground water
        treatment and recovery system shortly.

        [The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site  was scored.  The description
        may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.  See 56 FR 5600,
        February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.]
     Superfund hazardous waste site listed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) as amended

-------
-EPA
                          UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                              NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL)
                                                         September 1997
OSWER/OERR
State, Tribal, and Site Identification Center
                                                                                         Washington, DC 20460
                                                        SPRAGUE ROAD  GROUND WATER PLUME
                                                                                         Odessa,  Texas

        Conditions at Proposal (April 1997): A plume of contaminated ground water has been identified in Odessa, Ector
        County, Texas.  The precise extent of the plume has not yet been identified; however, based on analyses of ground
        water from 14 wells, it is approximately 180 acres In area.  The primary contaminant detected in the ground water
        plume is chromium. Three chromium plating facilities with various potential sources of contamination have been
        identified in the immediate area of the plume - Leigh Metal Plating, Inc.; National Chromium Corporation; and
        Machine and Casting, Inc. Several potential sources at these facilities have been presented in the HRS documentation
        record as potential sources because of their proximity to the ground water plume and the presence of the same
        contaminants as those identified in the plume.  However, adequate information  is not available to directly  attribute
        contamination detected  at these facilities with the ground water plume.  Therefore, the site has been scored based on
        a contaminated ground water plume with no single source identified.

        Based on analytical results from various investigations conducted at the three  facilities, a plume of contaminated
        ground water at concentrations ranging up to 5,240 micrograms per liter (/xg/L) has been identified.  The ground water
        pathway contamination is of concern because of the documentation of observed releases of chromium in ground water
        (nine ground water drinking wells and five ground water monitoring wells) and the fact that the contaminated aquifer
        is used as a source of drinking water in the area.  Seven of the nine drinking  water wells have concentrations of
        chromium that exceed  the Maximum Contaminant Level.

        Status (September 1997):  EPA conducted a response action by removing solid and liquid wastes at Leigh Metal
        Plating and National Chromium, and contaminated soil at Leigh'Metal Plating. Removal actions by EPA resulted in
        6,620 gallons of liquid and solid wastes,  156,320 pounds of vat and tank liquid and sludge, and 5,187,340 pounds of
        soil removed from the site.  EPA has also begun investigation of the ground  water contamination near the three
        facilities by installing 12 monitoring wells and collecting 40 water samples from monitoring wells and nearby private
        water supply wells.

        [The description of the site is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The description may
        change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.  See 56 FR 5600, February
        11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.]
     Superfund hazardous waste site listed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) as amended

-------
United States Environmental Protection Agency
For further information, call the Superfund Hotline, toll-free 1-800-
424-9346 or (703) 412-9810 in Washington, DC metropolitan area,
or the U.S. EPA Superfund Regional Offices listed below*.

For publications, contact EPA Superfund Docket at (703) 603-8917
SUPERFUND.DOCKET@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV
by Mail:
EPA Superfund Docket (5201G)
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
                              Walk-in Address (by Appt.):
                              EPA Superfund Docket
                              1235 Jefferson Davis Highway
                              Crystal Gateway #1, IstFloor
                              Arlington, Virginia
     Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
                      (5204G)
    United States Environmental Protection Agency
                 -401 M Street, SW
               Washington, DC 20460
                  (703) 603-8860
                     Region 1
 Connecticut
 Maine
 .Massachusetts
                         New Hampshire
                         Rhode Island
                         Vermont
       Waste Management Division, HAA-CAN-1
          John F. Kennedy Federal Building
              Boston, MA 02203-2211
                  (617)573-5707	
                     Region 2
 New Jersey                Puerto Rico
 New.Yp.rK	^JlSJnJllands	
      Emergency and Remedial Response Division
              290 Broadway, 19th Floor
             New York, NY 10007-1866
 	        (212) 637-4390	•
                     Region3
Delaware
District of Columbia
                           Pennsylvania
                           Virginia
           Site Assessment Section, 3HW33
                841 Chestnut Building
               Philadelphia, PA 19107
                   (215) 566-3033
                     Region 4
  Alabama                  Mississippi
  Florida                   North Carolina
  Georgia                   South Carolina
  JCentuckjr	JifUflSssee	
             Waste Management Division
        .       100 Alabama Street, SW
                  Atlanta, GA 30303
                   (404)562-8651
                      Region 5
  Illinois
  Indiana
  Michigan
                          Minnesota
                          Ohio
             Waste Management Division
         77 West Jackson Boulevard, 6th Floor
                  Chicago, IL 60604
         	(312) 886-7570	
                                                                                     Region 6
Arkansas
Louisiana
Oklahoma
Texas
                                                                      Hazardous Waste Management Division, 6H-M
                                                                                  1445 Ross Avenue
                                                                               Dallas, TX 76202-2733
                                                                     	(214) 665-6740	
                                                                                     Region 7
                                                                  Iowa
                                                                  Kansas.-
                         Missouri
                        p_N_ebraska_
                                                                             Waste Management Division
                                                                                726 Minnesota Avenue
                                                                                Kansas City, KS 66101
                                                                             (913) 551-7062 or 551-7595
                                                                                     Region 8
Colorado                 South Dakota
Montana                 Utah
.North. Dakota	.Wy.offiiQg.i	
  Hazardous Waste Management Division, 8HWM-SR
             999 18th Street, Suite 500
             Denver, CO 80202-2466
_	(303) 294-7630	
                                                                                      Region 9
                                                                  American         Guam          Northern
                                                                  Arizona          Hawaii         Trust Territories
                                                                  California	.Nsyj^JS	
                                                                            Waste Management Division, H-l
                                                                                 75 Hawthorne Street
                                                                               San Francisco, CA 94105
                                                                  	(415)744-1730  .   •	
                                                                                       Region 10
 Alaska
 Jdaho__
                                                                                           Oregon
         Hazardous Waste Division, HW-113
                 1200 6th Avenue
                Seattle. WA 98101  '
                  (202) 553-1677
                                                                  * All EPA telephone and telecommunications systems may be
                                                                  accessed via the Federal Telecommunications System (FTS).

-------