PB 230 379
SONOMA COUNTY SOLID WASTE STABILIZATION
STUDY
EMCON Associates
Prepared for:
Environmental Protection Agency
1974
DISTRIBUTED BY:
National Technical Information Service
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield Va. 22151
-------
BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA
SHEET
1. Report No.
EPA-SV-$30-65d
PB 230 379
4. Title and Subtitle
Sonoma County Solid Waste Stabilization Study
5- Report Date
1974
6.
7. Author(s)
F.MCON Associates
8- Performing Organization Kept.
No.
9. Performing Organization Name and Address
EMCON Associates
326 Commercial Street
San Jose, California
10. Project/Task/Work Unit No.
11. Contract/Grant No.
G06-EC-00351
12. Sponsoring Organisation Name and Address
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste Management Programs
,' Washington, D.C. 20460
13. Type of Report & Period
Covered
Interim
14.
15. Supplementary Notes
16. Abstracts
This report documents the first 2 years of a 3-year demonstration
projected sponsored by EPA and Sonoma County, Calif. The purpose of
the project is twofold: (1) to investigate the stabilization of solid
waste in a sanitary landfill by analyzing leachate, gas, temperature
and settlement parameters, and (2) to determine the effect on solid
waste stabilization of applying, under various operational modes, exces
water, septic tank pumpings, and recycled leachate in a sanitary land-
fill. This report describes the investigation of the test site,
construction, instrumentation, and site operations and discusses the
data produced thus far through extensive monitoring. Tables and figure
following this report summarize the detailed data presented in the
appendi ces.
17. Key Words and Document Analysis. 17a. Descriptors
Landfill, Leachate, Septic Tank, Water
17b. Identiflers/Open-Knded Terms
Test Cell, Solid WAste
.TI Field/Group
Reproduced by
NATIONAL TECHNICAL
INFORMATION SERVICE
U S Department of Commerce
Springfield VA 22151
*y Statement
19. Security Class (This
Report)
UNCLASSIFIED
20. Security Class (This
Page
UNCLASSIFIED
21. No. of Pages
%%•£>
22. Price
/4-sr>
-------
NOTICE
THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED PROM
THE BEST COPY FURNISHED US BY THE SPONSORING
AGENCY. ALTHOUGH IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT CER-
TAIN PORTIONS ARE ILLEGIBLE, IT IS BEING RE-
LEASED IN THE INTEREST OF MAKING AVAILABLE
AS MUCH INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE.
-------
l\
SOHOMA COUHTY SOLID «ASTE STABILIZATION STUDY
This interim report (SW-65d) describing work performed
for the Federal solid waste management program
under demonstration grant Nd. G06-EC-00351
to Sonoma County, California
was written by EMCON ASSOCIATES
and is reproduced as received from the grantee
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
1974
I
-------
Tliis report //j.v been reviewed by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and approved for publication. Approval docs not signify that
the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of commercial
products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the
U.S. Government.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 3
III. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION 7
IV. INSTRUMENTATION 13
V. REFUSE COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS 14
VI. OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT 17
VII. MONITORING PROGRAM 19
VIII. DISCUSSION 22
REFUSE COMPOSITION 22
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS 23
REFUSE STABILIZATION 26
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS 40
TABLES
1. Liquid Conditioning and Purpose of Cells 41
2. Refuse Moisture Content Summary 42
3. Refuse Composition Summary 43
4. Composition of Refuse 44
5. Solution Analysis 45
6. Cell C Leachate - Electro-Conductivity/ 46
Parameter Ratios
7. Cell D Leachate - Electro-Conductivity/ 48
Parameters Ratios
8. Companion Thermister Comparison 50
9. Trace Metal Concentrations in Leachate- 51
Cells A, B, & E
10. Trace Metal Concentrations in Leachate- 52
Cell C
11. Trace Metal Concentrations in Leachate- 53
Cell D
• t
-------
FIGURES
PAGE
1 .
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14.
15,
16.
17,
18.
19.
20.
21 .
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31 .
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
Locati on Map
Geologi c Map
Exploration Map
Field Density Test Location Map
Site Plan (as Built)
Section A-A, Site Plan
Section B-B, Site Plan
Clay Barrier
Typical Instrumentation Location Plan
Alkalinity vs. Time - Cells A-E
Volatile Acids vs. Time - Cells A-E
B.O.D. vs. Time - Cells A-E
C.O.D. vs. Time - Cells A-E
Total Dissolved Solids vs. Time - Cells
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
Plot
Plot
Plot
Plot
Plot
A-E
Plot of
A-E
Plot of
Plot
Plot
Plot
Plot
Plot
Plot
Plot
Plot
Plot
Plot
Plot
Plot
Plot
Plot
B
Electro-Conductivity vs. Time - Cells
Chloride vs. Time - Cells A-E
Sulphate vs. Time - Cells A-E
Phosphate vs. Time - Cells A-3
Nitrate vs. Time - Cells A-E
of Nitrogen-Ammonia vs. Time - Cells A-E
of Nitrogen-Organic vs. Time - Cells A-E
Sodium vs. Time - Cells A-E
Potassium vs. Time - Cells A-E
Calcium vs. Time - Cells A-E
Magnesium vs. Time - Cells A-E
ph vs. Time - Cel1s A-E
Iron vs. Time - Cells A-E
Fecal Coliform vs. Time - Cells A-E
Fecal Streptococci vs. Time - Cells A-E
Cumulative Leachate Production - Cells A,
E
Plot of Cumulative Water Distribution & Leachate
Collection-Cell C
Flui d Routing - Cel1
Fluid Routing - Cell
Plot of Temperature
Cells A-E
Plot of Temperature
Cell A
Plot of Temperature
Cell B
Plot of Temperature
Cell E
plot of Temperature
Cell C
°f Temperature
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
and
t -
C
D
vs .
vs .
vs .
vs .
vs .
vs .
i on
Ti
Ti
Ti
Ti
Ti
Ti
vs
me
me
me
me
me
me
Ti
- Middle The
- Al 1 Thermi
- All
- All
- All
- All
me -
The
The
rmi
rmi
Thermi
Thermi
Cell
s
rmi ster,
sters ,
s
s
s
s
A-
ters
ters
ters
ters
E
»
5
J
9
ells A-E
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
63
64
64
65
65
66
66
67
67
68
68
69
69
70
70
71
71
72
72
73
74
75
76
77
77
78
78
79
79
80
81
-------
APPENDICES PAGE
A. Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing 82
B. Test Cell Construction Data 93
C. Clay Barrier Construction Data 102
D. Instrument Details 105
E. Refuse Compositional Data 112
F. Monitoring Schedules 124
G. Analytical Methods and Procedures, etc. 131
H. Monitored Data 157"
I. Test Cell Refuse Placement History 218
BIBLIOGRAPHY 224
-------
PREFACE
Sanitary landfilling involves (1) the placement of refuse In a
manner which will not degrade the 1and-water-aIr environment of the
disposal site, (2) the compaction of the refuse to the smallest prac-
tical volume, (3) the daily covering of the refuse with a layer of
earth and (k) the performance of disposal operations without creating
nuisances or hazards to the health and safety of the surrounding com-
munIty.
Once disposed of in a sanitary landfill, the refuse presents a
potential source of pollution for a period of 10's to 100's of years.
The introduction of large quantities of water into the sanitary fill
either by acts of nature such as floods and rising groundwater or by
negligence of man through inadequate grading, drainage, or maintenance
of the earth cover can release pollutants from the decomposing refuse
to contaminate the groundwater and surface waters.
The study discussed in this report was conceived to test the hypo-
thesis that stabilization of refuse in a sanitary landfill can be ac-
celerated by the controlled application of water thereby reducing the
period of time during which the landfill presents a potential source
of pollution and the risk that such pollution might occur.
The stabilization of household refuse in a sanitary landfill is
being investigated in five large-scale, field test ce11s. The refuse
in the test cells is subjected to various moisture conditions and med-
iums through the controlled application of excess water, septic tank
pumpings and recycled leachate The stabilization of the refuse is
measured by monitoring and analysis of leachate, gas temperature and
settlement of the sanitary landfill,, In addition, the groundwater in
the vicinity of the test cells is tested periodically to detect any
significant change of groundwater quality.
This study is funded principally by the Environmenta1'Protection
Agency under Demonstration Grant No. G06-EC-00351 of the EPA Office of
vi
-------
Solid Waste Management Programs. Partial funding of the 3 year de-
monstration project is provided by the County of Sonoma, Project Spon-
sor.
Project Management
Mr. Donald B. Head, Director of Public Works, County of Son-
oma is Project Director. All project activities are directly supervised
by the Assistant Director of Public Works for Sonoma County, Mr. Duane
Butler. Project Engineer assisting Mr. Butler is Mr. Johnny Conaway.
Emcon Associates, Consultants in Waste Management, provides
technical direction and input to the project, as well as the laboratory
testing and analysis. Their services are under the direction of Pro-
ject Manager, Mr. John G. Pacey. Dr. James Leckie of Stanford Univer-
sity provides bio1ogica1-chemica1 consulting expertise through Emcon
Assoc i ates .
Acknow1edgmen ts
Among those who contributed significantly to the study were
the staff of the Environmental Protection Agency in Cincinnati, Ohio;
the State of California Department of Public Health; the State of Calif-
ornia Department of Water Resources; the County of Sonoma Sanitation
Department; and students of Sonoma State College and Santa Rosa Com-
mun i ty College.
vn
-------
I - INTRODUCTION
The investigation which forms the subject of this report was
authorized under a three-year demonstration grant project sponsored
by EPA and the County of Sonoma, California. The purpose of the pro-
ject is twofoId:
1.. To investigate the stabilization of refuse in a sanitary
landfill by analyzing leachate, gas, temperature and
settlement parameters.
2. To determine the effect on refuse stabilization of applying,
under various operational modes, excess water, septic tank
pumpings and recycled leachate to a sanitary landfill.
The stabilization of refuse is monitored in five instrumented
field scale test cells. Each test cell is subjected to a different
controlled moisture condition and/or liquid character. The liquid
conditioning and purpose of each cell are set forth in Table 1.
This report documents the site investigation, construction, in-
strumentation and site operations and presents and discusses data gen-
erated during the initial two years of the three-year demonstration
g ran t p roj ect.
The work completed to date was conducted jointly by the staffs
of Sonoma County Department of Public Works and Emcon Associates, the
County's consultant, and includes the following:
1. Geotechnical investigation of test site.
2. Construction and instrumentation of clay barrier.
3. Design and construction of five field scale refuse test cells
and various monitoring instruments and facilities for distri-
bution, collection and storage of leachate and water added to,
or withdrawn from the test cells.
k. Compositional analysis of refuse placed in the test cells.
5. Monitoring of refuse stabilization parameters, including
leachate and gas composition, temperature and settlement.
-------
6. Monitoring of selected groundwater parameters to determine
the effect of the project on the quality of the groundwater.
7. Development of leachate and gas sampling and analytical pro-
cedures .
During the first six months of the study, the geotechnical investi-
gation of the test cell area was accomplished, the test cells were con-
structed, refuse placed, and the cells were covered. From that time
data has been collected on a scheduled basis concerning refuse settle-
ment, cell temperatures, gas composition and leachate composition, as
well as external parameters concerning groundwater quality. Mean temp-
erature, rainfall, evaporation, storm runoff and quantity of liquid
added to and withdrawn from each demonstration test cell are also mon-
i tored.
The first two years of the study were completed in accordance with
the methodology and scope of work set forth in the demonstration appli-
cation. It is expected that the third year program will follow the same
pattern and that trends now becoming apparent will continue during the
forthcoming year.
Discussion presented in this report follows the sequence in which
the activities occurred, namely the first portions of the report de-
scribe the geotechnical investigation and construction activities follow-
ed by a discussion of instrumentation, compositional analysis of the re-
fuse, pertinent operations and management procedures and the monitoring
program. The main thrust of this report is a discussion of refuse stab-
ilization as measured by extensive monitored data. Tables and figures
following the text of this report summarize the detailed data presented
in the append i ces.
Readers wishing to examine closely the quantitative data will find
this information in the appendices following the main body of this report
-------
II - GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION - TEST CELL AREA
Scope of Work
The initial work element for the demonstration grant was a geo-
technical Investigation of the test cell area located within the Cen-
tral Disposal Site in Sonoma County, California. The purpose of the
investigation was (1) to determine the material types and conditions
underlying the test cell area, (2) to determine the suitability of the
site for the proposed use, and (3) to prepare appropriate recommend-
ations concerning the geotechnical aspects of the research program.
The scope of work completed in this investigation included a
surface and subsurface investigation, a review of geologic and engi-
neering data, laboratory testing of selected soil samples to determine
the pertinent physical and mechanical properties of the foundation
materials, and the evaluation of this data to determine the suit-
ability of the area for the intended program.
S i te Descr i pt i on
The Central Disposal Site is located in the southwestern portion
of Sonoma County, approximately *»5 road miles north of San Francisco,
California. (See Figure 1) The site consists of approximately kQQ
acres of sparsely-wooded grazing land in the well-rounded foothills
of the Northern Coast Range. It is located well away from the path
of urbanization, within a relatively short travel distance of central
service areas. An improved all-weather road leads to the large cen-
tral canyon. This canyon will provide capacity for disposal of solid
waste generated in Sonoma County well beyond the year 2000.
An area for the test cells was selected about midway up the cen-
tral canyon in a relatively flat portion of the valley, just east of
the main drainage channel, (see Figure 2.). A small tributary drain-
age channel passes through the test cell area bisecting it approxi-
mately in half, with three cells located to the north and two to the
-------
south of the tributary channel.
Placement of sanitary fill at the Central Disposal Site commenced
in the main canyon just above (north) the test cell area. Landfilllng
will proceed up the canyon away from the test cells. The test cell area
should therefore be available for uninterrupted research activities for
many years to come.
Geology
The Central Disposal Site is underlain primarily by marine sedi-
ments of the Franciscan Formation, (see Geologic Map, Plate 2). These
Jura-cretaceous rocks consist of sandy clayey shale with interbedded
sandstones and silicic chert beds. Geologic structure in the Francis-
can Formation sediments is extremely complex reflecting a turbulent his-
tory of faulting, folding and shearing. The trend of this bedrock sys-
tem is generally northwest-southeast through the Northern Coast Ranges
of Callforn i a.
The surface and near-surface deposits within the valley protions of
the site contain relatively thin deposits of poorly-consolidated sedi-
ments of younger Merced Formation. The Merced Formation rocks are of
P1io-Pleistocene Age and consist essentially of gravelly sandstones with
interbeds of sandy clay and silt. The basal portion of the Merced For-
mation contains a zone of we 1 1-indurated impervious volcanic tuff breccia
Sediments of the Merced Formation have been deposited on an old erosion
surface (valley) of the underlying older Franciscan Formation. The poor-
ly-consolidated sediments of the Merced Formation are relatively undis-
turbed as indicated by their near-horizontal attitude and uninterrupted
con t i nu i ty.
Subsurface Exploration
Five exploration trenches were excavated in the test cell area in or
der to examine foundation soil types and conditions and thereby determine
the most suitable location for the cells from the standpoint of geology.
-------
The locations of the trenches are shown on Figure 3 and the logs of
soils encountered in the trenches are presented in Appendix A. In gen'
eral, the materials encountered in the excavation were comprised of
sandy and sllty clays and clayey sands. Some gravel was encountered
in each trench and free water was observed in trench k.
Gi roundwater
Sedimentary rocks of the Franciscan formation are considered to
be essentially barren of fresh water. Locally, however, these well-
consolidated rock units contain small supplies of poor to fair quality
water which is used for domestic and stock water supply. The more
successful low-yield wells tap water supplies in deeply-weathered or
high1y-fractured rock. These marginal supplies of poor quality water
do not constitute a protectable resource. Sediments of the Merced
Formation contain groundwater of moderate to high quality in the more
pervious strata. This water is contained in beds of sand, lenses of
gravels and occasionally in lenses of permeable volcanic rock.
Groundwater was encountered in thin beds of clayey sand and gra-
vel just above the basal tuff breccia in each of the drill holes in
the canyon bottom areas. This aquifer ranged in thickness from two
to ten feet and occurred from 15 to 25 feet below ground surface.
The groundwater encountered in this formation was confined by over-
lying clays of low permeability and artesian pressure heads ranged
from ten to nearly twenty feet in exploration drill holes. Product-
ion capacities from wells in this thin stratum are estimated to be
marginal, but known hydraulic continuity between this aquifer and
major production aquifers to the south established the absolute need
to prevent pollution of this aquifer by harmful materials originating
i n the refuse f i1 I .
In addition to the subsurface groundwater, at least one perennial
and two intermittent springs exist in the large canyon at the upper
end of the Central Disposal Site. The backhoe investigation in the
test cell area revealed little groundwater within twelve feet of the
ground surface.
-------
Laboratory Investigation
Representative soil samples recovered from the exploration trenches
were tested in the laboratory to determine their physical and mech-
anical characteristics- Test data are presented in Appendix A. Based *"
on the results of these laboratory tests, It was concluded that the
clay soils possess a permeability of less than one foot a year and soils —
excavated for construction of the test ce1Js can be readily recompacted.
Conclus 5 ons
Based on the results of the field and laboratory investigation,
we determined that the test cell area was suitable for the research
test cells. It was decided that excavations for construction of the
test cells should terminate within the upper sandy clay and clayey sand
materials of low permeabi1ity„ Application of this criteria, tempered
by drainage considerations and evaluation of the cut-and-fill material
balance, resulted in the siting of the test cells at the locations
shown on the plans.
The nativ* soils in their existing state were considered generally
satisfactory for retaining any leachate developed during excavation of
the test cells. Occasional lenses or layers of more previous water-
bearing soils were expected in the cell excavations. Such areas were
to be over-excavated two feet and an impervious clay lining was to be
placed to restore the test ceils to design grade, Material generated
from excavation of the cells was considered suitable for construction of
the embankment portion of the test cells. The resulting test cells
would thus be relatively impervious and capable of retaining leachate
and gas.
-------
I I I-PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
Project construction generally proceeded as originally de-
signed and presented on the drawings which accompanied the demon-
stration grant application. However, some design modifications
were made during construction to meet changed conditions and re-
flect additional decisions. Final construction details are shown
on Figures 5, 6 and 7 "As Built" drawings.
CELL CONSTRUCT I ON
Excavat i on
The test cells were excavated to design grade and the material
removed was stockpiled adjacent to the cells.
Some groundwater was encountered in the excavation of Cells A
and E. As a consequence, the subsurface drains above Cell A and E
and above Cells B through D were installed prior to construction of
the embankment.
After excavation to design grade, the ground surface was Inspect-
ed to determine the presence of any pervious lenses within the cell
configuration. A thin zone of pervious material was encountered in
Cells A and E. This material was removed by ove r-excava 11 rvg two
feet. This area was then restored to design grade with a two-foot-
th5ck layer of compacted clay.
Embankment
The embankment areas of the test cells were first stripped of
all surface organic matter. The ground surface was then scarified
and compacted. The stockpiled material from cell excavation was
utilized as embankment fill and was placed in lifts of six inch un-
compacted thickness. The lifts were moisture conditioned as neces-
sary to achieve proper compaction and compacted by numerous passes
-------
of a 5 x 5 sheepsfoot compactor drawn by a D-7 tractor and a Buffalo
Springfield steel wheeled compactor*
Field density tests were taken during the placement operation to
determine the relative compaction of the embankment materials. Results
of the field density tests and laboratory control curves are presented
In Append i x B.
When the downhill embankment had been constructed to a level two
feet above the floor of the cell, trenches for the leachate collection
lines were excavated in the bottom of the cell and a trench was exca-
vated through the embankment for the leachate line discharging to the
collection tank. Leachate collection lines were placed in the trenches
and backfilled. The trench through the embankment was backfilled with
a combination of native soil and 10% bentonite, by weight, in order to
assure an impervious backfill. The embankments were then raised to de-
sign grade. A shallow trench was excavated on the inside slope from
the top of the embankment to the base of the cell for installation of
th«* lysimeter and gas collection lines.
Leachate Collection System
After the cells were excavated and graded and the embankments had
been constructed to an elevation two feet above the base of the cells,
trenches were excavated in the base of the cells and through the em-
bankments for placement of the leachate collection lines. Pea gravel
was placed around the collection lines in Cell C and D.
All collection tanks were positioned below the test cells with the
top of tank below the base of the test cells, thereby assuring positive
drainage of leachate into the collection facilities.
In Cells A and E a single leachate collection line was installed
across the lower (west) side of the base as only a small quantity of
leachate was expected. A full system of leachate collection lines was
installed in Cells B through D to collect the large quantities of leach-
ate expected from these cells. Cell B was expected to develop a consid'
erable quantity of leachate only during the initial charging to field
-------
capacity. Nevertheless, the quantity expected was such that a full
collection system was installed.
Refuse
Refuse was initially dumped at the edge of the cell and then
pushed into the cell and spread by a D-? dozer. The dozer compacted
the refuse in a manner similar to the procedures that would be used
in the normal sanitary landfill operation.
All incoming refuse was weighed. Samples of the refuse were
obtained for compositional analyses in accordance with accepted stat-
istical sampling methods. The samples were hand sorted into approp-
riate waste categories in a covered work area within five miles of
the j ob site.
G r a n u1 a r Materials
Granular materials were used as backfill in the leachate collec-
tion trenches and for distribution material between the distribution
lines and refuse in Cell C and D. Mechanical analyses of potentially
suitable materials were performed prior to cell construction (See
Appendix B). Concrete sand and muck sand from Basalt were accepted
for the silty sand and concrete sand requirements. Pea Gravel was
substituted for the proposed fine soil backfill material on leachate
collection lines in Cells C and D and for material placed between re-
fuse and distribution lines in Cell D. This substitution was made to
avoid the filtering action that might occur when leachate passes
through f i ne so i1.
Cover Mate r i a 1
Cover material generally consisted of the stockpiled sandy clay
material from cell excavation The cover material was placed as a
two-foot capping over the refuse in Cells A, B and E. A one-foot thick-
ness of permeable material was placed between the refuse and sandy clay
-------
cover in Cell C and D to facilitate distribution of water and leachate.
In Cell C this one-foot of material consisted of a layer of fine si1ty
sand placed directly overlying the refuse. A six-inch mound of concrete
sand was placed around the liquid distribution lines installed be-
tween the si I ty sand and cover material. A 12-inch layer of pea gra-
vel (in lieu of si1ty sand) was placed between the refuse and cover
material in Cell D to minimize any filtration of leachate.
Tiie sandy clay was spread in one-foot lifts and compacted by num-
erous passes of a D-7 dozer. Two-inch-dIameter holes were augered
through the cell cover at intervals of 10 feet to permit measurement
of the in-place thickness of cover material. The cover thickness
measurements for all cells are presented in Appendix 8.
Leachate Distribution System
As previously mentioned, a twelve-inch layer of pea gravel was
placed over the refuse in Cell D in lieu of the originally planned fine
si1ty sand spreading medium. Elimination of the spreading medium neces-
sitated further changes in the distribution system for Cell D to assure
uniform application of recycled leachate over the refuse. The changes
consisted of the installation of two separate leachate distribution
systems utilizing eight lines each with lines more closely spaced than
the originally planned eleven line system. The decreased total foot-
age in each system made necessary an increase in the size of the small
discharge holes to maintain planned distribution rates. This had the
side benefit of reducing the potential for plugging of the holes by so-
lids in the leachate.
Clay Barrier Construction
An impervious clay barrier was constructed across the lower end of
the central canyon, below (south) of the test cells and central disposal
areas, to block the subsurface escape of leachate and gases which might
emanate from the sanitary landfill and test cells. See Figure 8 for max-
imum cross section.
-------
Native sandy clay soils were excavated to bedrock in preparation
for construction of the barrier. Conditions encountered in the ex-
cavation were as originally estimated with the maximum depth of ex-
cavation being 30 to 35 feet below the valley floor or approximately
20 to 25 feet below the canyon creek channel. The excavation was
inspected by Mr. Jack McCollough, the Engineering Geologist involved
in the original investigation of the valley, and Mr. John Pacey,
Consulting Engineer for the construction phase of the grant project.
A sump was excavated at the low point of excavation on the
downstream side of the barrier excavation and backfilled with granular
material. A perforated pipe was installed in the sump and extended to
the natural ground surface to permit future removal of seepage waters
collected in the drainage blanket, if required.
The barrier was constructed by backfilling the excavation with
sandy clay soil obtained from the excavation. The fill material was
spread by a D-8 Caterpillar Tractor in relatively thin lifts which
were moisture conditioned as necessary to permit achievement of the
required relative compaction and compacted by numerous passes of a
5x5 Sheepsfoot roller drum pulled by a TD-24 tractor. A sand drain-
age blanket was placed between the downstream face of the clay barrier
and natural ground.
A moisture-density curve was developed in our laboratory to est-
ablish relative compaction parameters for the backfill material in
accordance with ASTM Test Designation D698-70. Field density tests
were performed periodically during the filling operation at random
locations. Test methods utilized included both the sand cone method
(ASTM Test Designation D 1556) and the nuclear density test method
(ASTM Test Designation D 2922-71). The field density test results and
laboratory compaction curve are presented in Appendix C.
The barrier was constructed up to a point slightly above the
stream channel elevation under the inspection and testing control of
Mr. James Cleary of Emcon Associates. County personnel directed and
inspected the placement of additional fill required to raise the grade
up to the natural ground surface and to provide an aesthetically-
pleasing finish ground surface. No tests were performed on this final
1 1
-------
10 feet of fill, as this work was principally for aesthetic purposes
Nevertheless, precautions were taken by County Staff to assure that
the material was properly moisture conditioned and compacted.
12
-------
IV - INSTRUMENTATION
Stabilization of the refuse is monitored by instruments installed
in the test cells and by testing of leachate and gas samples withdrawn
from the cells at programmed intervals. Instrumentation installed
for refuse stabilization data retrieval include gas probes, thermistors,
settlement monuments and leachate collection facilities.
Evaporation, rainfall and Cell runoff data necessary to evaluate
rainfall infiltration into the test cells, are recorded respectively
by an evaporimeter, rain gauge and two flow meters. Additional flow
meters connected at appropriate locations in the collection, discharge
and distribution piping, record the daily application of water to Cell
C and makeup water applied to Cell D, as well as the quantity of leach-
ate produced by Cells C and D.
Instrumentation for obtaining groundwater samples and measuring
its quality include observation wells installed downh ill and uphill
of the test cells and up-valley of the clay barrier, and lysimeters
installed below each test cell. Groundwater levels within and be-
neath the clay barrier are monitored by piezometers.
Instrument locations and identification symbols used in recording
data developed are shown on Figure 9. Detailed drawings of the in-
struments utilized are presented in Appendix D.
13
-------
V - REFUSE COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS
The composition and moisture content of refuse placed in the
test cells was determined by analyzing refuse samples selected by
statistical sampling methods. The sampling schedule was derived
by use of Random Sample numbers, as noted and shown on Plate E-I .
Sample Procurement Procedure
The weigh master marked the refuse trucks containing refuse to
be sampled as it left the scale. Trucks marked for sampling were
directed by the traffic dispatcher to deposit its load of refuse
adjacent to the designated cell. A front loader scooped 300 or more
pounds of refuse at random from this pile and loaded it into the bed
of a pickup truck. The sample was then enclosed in a canvas tarp
and transported to the sorting center which was located about 5 miles
east in the county road maintenance yard at Cotati.
The sample was removed from the truck, placed on a thick black
plastic ground cloth and sorted. Forty-two part-time employees, prim-
arily students from Sonoma State College and Santa Rosa Community Col-
lege, were employed to sort the refuse samples. Ten labelled 32-gal-
lon trash cans with plastic liners were positioned around the sample.
Two to six students classif5ed, segregated and deposited the material
in the trash cans. Approximately 10. man-hours were required to sort
a sample. The material was sorted into the following 10 categories:
1. Food Waste
2. Garden Waste
3. Paper
k. Plastics, Rubber, Leather
5. Text i les
6.
7.
8.
9.
0.
Wood
Metals
Glass
Ash , Rock ,
Fines
Di rt
-------
After the sample was sorted, all cans in each category were
weighed and recorded. The total weight of waste In each category is
presented on Plates E2-E6.
Sorting Guidelines
1. Synthetic material was classified as a plastic.
2. F i ne s were defined as any material that would pass through
a 1" sieve. No further classification was attempted.
3. Wood was wood material that had been processed at a mill,
i.e., a 2x4 was classified as wood, but a tree limb or
branch was classified as garden waste.
k. Food wastes included: bones, shells, feathers, and fecal
material. Food wastes were scraped out of their containers
and the container deposited into its appropriate category.
5. Labels were left on containers.
Moi s tu re De te rm inat ion
Samples of segregated refuse are bulky, take a long time to dry and
generate an obnoxious odor while drying. Therefore, the small capa-
city ovens of the Sonoma County Soils Lab were not adequate to handle
the large number of samples obtained. County staff therefore designed
and built two drying racks that could hold 16-2 feet x k feet X 6 inch
deep sheet metal trays. The racks were enclosed with sheet metal and
heated by a propane-fired forced air heater. This system maintained
a relatively constant temperature of 105° F, drying most samples in
from 2 to 6 days.
All samples were weighed before being placed in the drier. The
samples were subsequently checked and their weights recorded every
morning and evening. When two consecutive recorded weights were
equal, the sample was considered dry.
Data was obtained for two types of moisture samples:
1. Total Sample - A sample was extracted from the sorting sample
as it was loaded onto the pickup truck at the test cells.
This sample contained a representative amount of all constit-
uents and was not sorted.
15
-------
These samples were dried separately and the data is reported
on Plates E7-E11 in the four left-hand columns.
Compos ite Sample - Samples of each of the ten constituents from
each sorted sample were obtained and sealed in plastic bags.
Four or more of these like category samples were combined for this
drying procedure. In combining the samples only sequential sajn-
ples were used and the constituent samples of one cell were never
mixed with those of another.
This data is reported on Plates E7-E11 in the ten right-hand
columns. The samples from which the composite sample was gener-
ated are listed under the appropriate grouping.
16
-------
VI - OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT
AUTOMATIC OPERATIONS
Ligufd Collect ion and Distribution System
Cell C and D distribution and collection systems are controlled
by a central timer that activates twice daily at pre-set intervals.
Four standard house service water meters measure the quantity of liq-
*""_ uids applied to and discharged from the cells. One meter measures
the fresh water inflow to the Cell C distribution system. One meter
*-" is connected to the leachate collection tank discharge line of Cell
C and records the quantity of leachate pumped from the collection
_ tank and disposed of in the adjacent main landfill. A meter Is in-
stalled in Cell D leachate return line and records the leachate re-
cycled through Cell D. The final meter is on the fresh water system
for Cell D and records the make-up water that is added to maintain
the desired quantity of liquid recycled through Cell D.
Cell A 6 E leachate is metered by a house service water meter
and discharged to the main landfill with an electric pump.Cell B leach'
~~ ate is discharged to a collection tank and the quantity is measured
with a graduated bucket. The leachate is disposed of in the main
_ landfi 1 1 .
Storm Runoff Collection and Monitor ing System
Storm runoff from Cell B and the combined runoff from Cells A
& E is collected in swales constructed in the cell embankments and
discharged through drainage inlets to collection tanks. The collec-
tion tanks discharge through Sparling low pressure line meters which
record the runoff quantity.
«
~ MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT
The site is inspected daily by disposal operation's personnel to
check for any vandal ism, theft or equipment malfunction. An
17
-------
office engineer visits the test cell site weekly for a detailed check
on all systems and to record the monitoring data. His duties are:
1) Record all meter readings.
2) Check, retrieve and replace charts on the recording evapor-
meter and rain gauge.
3) Test the discharge rates for Cell C and D distribution systems.
k) Check and test automatic timing system.
5) Record meter readings on storm runoff metering devices.
MAINTENANCE
Although the Cell design and construction minimized the main-
tenance functions, three basic operational maintenance funtions remain:
1) Since water service is not available at the site, water is
hauled by truck to a 6,000 gallon storage tank that supplies
the daily water for Cell 'C1 distribution and the makeup water
for Cel1 D.
2) The distribution lines in Cells C & D have to be cleaned period-
ically.
Ce11 C - The clear plastic tubing, connecting the discharge
manifold pipe to the small diameter distribution pipe have
to be cleaned of algae periodically.
Cel 1 D - The small diameter discharge holes In the distribution
piping clog due to fungus growth caused by the leachate.
These holes must be cleaned periodically.
3) The leachate generated from Cells A,B,C, E, and the adjacent
sanitary landfill is pumped into the sanitary landfill. A
22-foot deep, 6-inch diameter grave 1-packed well was drilled
in the main landfill refuse and is presently accepting all
excess leachate from this project. This construction is of
a temporary nature and has to be checked and serviced because
of line breakage due to landfill equipment operations.
18
-------
VI I - MONITORING PROGRAM
GENERAL
The monitoring program involves the collection of liquid and gas
samples for field and laboratory testing and retrieval of data from
instruments installed in and about the test cells and clay barrier.
Monitoring activities are carried out jointly by the staffs of
Sonoma County Department of Public Works and Emcon Associates. Rain-
fall, evaporation, storm runoff and refuse settlement, as well as the
metering of water and leachate flows into and out of Cells C and D
are monitored by Sonoma County Staff. The staff of Emcon Associates
collects and tests samples of leachate, gas, Cell C input water, and
groundwater, and monitors lysimeters, thermisters and groundwater
1 eve 1s.
All monitored data is presented in Appendix H.
SAMPLING AND TESTING SCHEDULES
Sampling and testing of leachate and groundwater commenced in
December 1971. In February 1972, a formal schedule for frequency of
leachate, gas and groundwater sampling and analysis was adopted.
The initial and revised sampling and testing schedules are pre-
sented in Appendix F.
SAMPLE COLLECTION
Leachate, Groundwater, and Water Added to Cell C and D
Leachate samples are obtained at sampling valves located in the
collection line just upstream from the !eachate col 1ection tank. The
collection line discharges into the collection tank through a riser
19
-------
which extends above the elevation of the sampling valve. This arrange-
ment minimizes the exposure of the leachate to the atmosphere.
The groundw»ter is sampled and tested to detect any contamination
by leachate escaping from the cells. Groundwater samples are bailed
or pumped from the observation wells and periodically collected from
the Cell A subdrain outfall. Samples of water added to Cell C are ob-
tained directly from the water distribution tank. The exposure of the
groundwater samples to air during the bailing and collection process,
although not desirable, is not considered detrimental to detection of
contamination by leachate.
All samples of leachate and water are field tested for pH , dis-
solved oxygen and electro-conductivity. These tests require approxi-
mately 100 to 200 ml. samples. Samples scheduled for laboratory test-
ing of parameters that deteriorate rapidly with time are treated with
a compatible preservative. Samples are stored on ice from the time
they are collected until they are delived to the laboratory. Upon
arrival at the laboratory the samples are refrigerated until tested.
Sampling and test procedures are discussed in detail in Appendix G.
Gas
Gas is pumped from the gas probes using a battery-operated John-
son-Williams Model SSP Combustible Gas indicator. Gas samples are
collected in gas sample tubes. Sampling procedures and the gas analy-
sis test method are presented in Appendix G.
Lys i meters
Lysimeters are sampled periodically by injecting compressed air
through one of two IM inch tubings connected to the lysimeter. The
fluid sample is discharged' from the second \/k inch tubing and collect-
ed for testing. Fluid collected is field tested for pH, dissolved oxy-
gen and, when sufficient quantity is available, electro-conductivity.
20
-------
Fluid Distribution andLeachate Production
Flow meters, installed at appropriate locations in the d1str1 bution
and collection piping of Cells C and D, are read periodically to
determine the quantity of fluid entering and leaving the cells.
21
-------
VI I I - DISCUSSION
REFUSE COMPOSITION
Refuse compositional analysis data Is presented in Appendix E
and is summarized in Table 2, Refuse Moisture Content Summary and
Table 3, Refuse Composition Summary. Both moisture and weight per-
centage figures for the various waste constituents are quite similar
for all cells. The average weight percentage of waste constituents
from all cells are compared with similar compositional data for the
City of Berkeley, California*, the County of Santa Clara, California*
and a study by Dr. Pohland at the Georgia Institute of Technology,
in Table k. The average values determined for the various waste
constituents in the Sonoma County study are reasonably similar to the
values developed for the City of Berkeley and the County of Santa
Clara. Each of the California studies differ significantly from Dr.
Pohland's Georgia study in percentage of textiles, metals, glass and
food wastes. Data from Dr. Pohland's study is included as several of
his project objectives parallel objectives of this study.
The Sonoma study developed a somewhat lower percentage by weight
of paper as compared to the City of Berkeley, Santa Clara County and
Dr. Pohland's study figures. Frequently, paper is reported in the
literature as comprising over k$ percent of the total waste.
REACTIVITY OF CELL CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL
In order to establish the reactive character of the granular
material, 20 gram samples of material were placed in distilled water
in 300 ml. BOD bottles. Four sample bottles were prepared for each
of the three granular materials. A schedule was established to test
the water at time intervals of one week, six months, one year and two
years, respectively. The tests include pH, alkalinity, Na, K, Ca, Mg
and electrical conductivity determinations.
Test results to date (Table 5) indicate that only insignificant
quantities of dissolved materials are contributed by the granular mater-
ials used in the test cells. The general composition of water in
* "Comprehensive Studies of Solid Waste Management, 1st and 2nd Annual
Reports" , prepared by C. G, Golueke and P. H. McGauhey, Public
Health Service Pub 1 icat iion No. 2039, 1970.
-------
continual contact with the granular materials appears to be stable in
each case except for pH. No explanation is offered for the increase
in pH, however, it is unlikely that the change in pH in the test solu-
tions would influence the composition of the leachate materials.
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
Gene ra1
Experience with sampling procedures and analytical methods on
numerous samples of leachate has necessitated changes in both sampling
techniques and analytical methods. The need for such changes was gen-
erally anticipated, but it was not possible to specifically predict
them as leachate exhibits a complex and changing nature.
The following general statements can be made about analytical met-
hods as related to leachate tests:
1. The analytical philosophy should be one of attention to ac-
curacy rather than precision.
2. The analysis is made difficult by the danger of interfer-
ences due to the high concentration of solutes and the chang-
ing nature of the leachate.
3- Colormetric methods are generally not applicable due to the
complex nature of the solution and the high background color
of undiluted leachate samples.
*». It is not possible to analyze for calcium and magnesium on
undiluted leachate samples using the normal EDTA titrimetric
technique due to masking of the end point by background color.
5. On undiluted leachate samples, it is necessary to use a po-
tentiometric titration technique for chloride utilizing an
Ag/AgCl electrode because of color interference.
6. The concentrations of most common constituents in leachate
are generally very high and require dilution prior to analyses
Total Suspended Solids
Analytical measurement of total suspended solids (TSS) in leachate
23
-------
samples is subject to possible error because of the oxidation of re-
duced iron and manganese and the subsequent precipitation of ferric
hydroxide and manganese dioxide in the sample. Depending upon the
sequence of sampling and the care of analyses, experience has shown
that an inordinate variation in measured total suspended solids (TSS)
results, (see tabulated data in Appendix H).
Our experience has shown that when proper care is taken to avoid the
formation of precipitate in the sample that TSS is generally low (<50ppm).
Considering that great care must be taken at all points in the
handling of the sample to avoid introduction of oxygen prior to mea-
surement of TSS and also that the data are marginal in terms of inter-
pretive value, measurement of TSS in leachate is not recommended and
has been discontinued.
Colo r
Quantitative measurement of color is useful only to the extent that
it measures the relative intensity of this parameter and may be cor-
relateable with other more meaningful measurements. Since even slight
turbidity (suspended solids) causes the apparent color to be notice-
ably higher than the true color, it is necessary to remove suspended
material before true color can be approximated. Removal of suspend-
ed solids is normally done by centrifugation.
Measurement of color in leachate samples is somewhat complicated
by the fact that diffusion of oxygen into the leachate sample causes
the oxidation of reduced Fe and Mn solution species and, hence, the
precipitation of the hydroxide and dioxide, respectively. The for-
mation of small, colloidal solids Interferes with the color measure-
ment, and due to the high concentration of reduced iron (and probably •
Mn) in solution it is necessary to either ('i) prevent oxidation and
precipitation from occurring or (2) allow complete oxidation and
precipitation to occur and remove the precipitate by centrifugation.
The first procedure, preventing diffusion of oxygen into the
sample, requires care in handling of the sample at all points of trans-
fer prior to analysis. The second procedure, is more time consuming
than the first and may still result in very small colloidal particles
-------
remaining in solution despite centrifuga11 on. Given the limited value
of the color measurements to begin with and the handling problems dis-
cussed above, measurement of color in leachate is not recommended and
has been discontinued.
Eleet ro-Con duct i v i ty Rat i os
Selection of the degree of dilution required for various analytical
tests is complicated by the changing nature of leachate as a function
of time and site. Since electro-conductivity (EC) is essentially a
measure of the concentration of dissolved ions in solution, there is a
strong possibility that a correlation between EC and major ionic species
can be made. The correlation between EC and other chemical parameters
has therefore been investigated as a possible aid in predicting a pro-
per dilution ratio.
Results utilizing the data available indicate the EC ratios may
prove of value in estimating dilution requirements for some parameters.
Ratio data for leachate from Cells C and D are presented in Tables 6
and 7. Especially good correlation is found between EC and alkalinity,
chloride, BOD, COD, Na and K.
Somewhat greater scatter is seen for the data on calcium and mag-
nesium. The scatter in data on sulfate is expected since SOj. is a re-
active compound under reducing conditions and hence should not be ex-
pected to follow EC values consistently.
Except for magnesium snd sulfate the EC ratios for the two cells
are surprisingly close. This indicates that, at least for these few
parameters, EC ratios can be used effectively in estimating concentra-
tions for dilution in the laboratory. This may be especially useful
in cases where spot samples are brought in for analysis with no prior
information on the leachate composition.
Gas Analyzer
In addition to its use as & pump to withdraw gat samples from the
gas probes, the gas analyzer also registers exp1osib I 1ity of the gas.
Although the value registered is not used to determine precise percent-
ages of gases present, the instrument can be used to detect the presence
of combustible gases.
-------
Therm!s te rs
In order to establish that thermisters installed within the gas
probe conduits register temperature representative of the refuse at
that location, thermisters were installed both inside and outside the
top gas probe in Cell B. No appreciable difference in temperature
was registered by the thermisters. The comparative data is presented
in Table 8.
Gas Samp I ing
The initial gas samples obtained 12-8-71 were collected in large
evacuated sample bottles and are considered to be uncontaminated
samples. These test results are therefore reliable. Samples taken
between 1-3~72 and 3-14-72 were collected utilizing a flushing tech-
nique which resulted in collection of samples contaminated with at-
mospheric air. Subsequent modification of the sampling technique to
include evacuation of the sample bottle have eliminated this problem.
Test results commencing 3-28-72 are considered representative of the
gas produced in the refuse cells.
REFUSE STABILIZATION
Gene raI
Sanitary landfilUng is now widely utilized for solid waste
disposal and careful planning and the application of sound engineering
principles to all facets of site selection, design, construction and
operation help insure that the environmental impact is minimal and,
in some cases, beneficial. With increased use and public awareness
of this method of disposal, increased concern has also developed
with respect to the pollution potential of leachate, its possible
detrimental effects upon surface water and groundwater, and a reali-
zation that in some cases interception and treatment of this liquid
may be necessary.
In spite of satisfactory landfill design and operation, leaching
26
-------
can and frequently does occur. This has been documented by field ob-
servations and case histories which indicate that leachate production
is a most frequent problem in geographical areas which have relatively
high annual rainfall. Limited data collected to date indicate that
some leachates are extremely high in both organic and inorganic con-
stituents and provide potential sources of significant amount of pol-
lutants.
Examination of the leachate problem reveals that even in landfills
containing only municipal refuse, a large number of variables interact
to produce an unpredictable quantity and quality of leachate. A few
of the relevant parameters affecting leachate quantity and quality are:
annual rainfall, runoff, infiltration, mean annual air temperature,
waste composition, waste density, initial moisture content, and depth
of landfill. Additional variables are macro and micro nutrients, and
toxic elements and compounds.
Studies of leachate composition indicate wide variation from site
to site and at any give site with time. Adding to the complexity of
the problem is the fact that leachate flow rates frequently vary widely
over time at any one site.
This study has been designed to investigate the effect of several
modes of operation upon the rate and extent of stabilization of muni-
cipal refuse in sanitary landfills. Five test cells have been construct-
ed and subjected to the operational modes presented in Table 1. The
modes of operation chosen for this study include: (l) addition of excess
water to the refuse after refuse emplacement, (2) recircu1 ation of leach-
ate, and (3) addition of septic tank pumpings to the landfill materials.
The extent of refuse stabilization is being evaluated principally
by monitoring leachate composition. Primary leachate composition
parameters include BOD, COD, pH, alkalinity, volatile acids, phosphate
and forms of nitrogen. In addition, electrical conductivity, tempera-
ture and various inorganic anions and cations are being monitored to
define leachate composition. The time response of these parameters
are presented in Figures 10 through 40. Following is a short discus-
sion of the general effect of seasonal varietlon of rainfall infil-
tration and temperature after which each test cell is discussed sepa-
rately with comparisons made to both the control cell and to literature
if»f orma t i on .
27
-------
Rat nfal 1 I nf11tratton
The first rains of winter have relatively free access to the
refuse through shrinkage cracks in the cell cover material. Natural
swelling of the soil seals these cracks and thereafter the cover
material is relatively impervious. The infi1 atration water influ-
ences the moisture content of the cells and, hence the process of
refuse stabilization. Rainfall records (Figure 30) for the study
site show that very little precipitation occured duriing the first
winter (1971~72). Consequently, very little leachate developed as
a result of infiltration. The second winter (1972-73) however, was
a near-record year for the rainfall and leachate was developed in all
cells, indicating significant infiltration. (Figure 30)
Cell D was a fully saturated system prior to the heavy 1972-73
winter rains and has been monitored on a continuous basis. Prior to
the winter rains (before November 1972) the recycled leachate applied
to Cell D was approximately 6,000 to 8,000 gallons per week (Figure
33)- The maximum quantity of recirculated leachate put through
the Icell was approximately 37,000 gallons per week (February and
March 1973). Although there may be some differences in infiltration
rates between cells, it is reasonable to sxpect that significant
infiltration occured in all test cells. The refuse in both Cells B
and E was wetted to field capacity, but the cells have responded to
the infiltrated volume of rain water In different manners (Figure
30). At the present time, it is not clear why the rate of leachate
production is so different between Cells B and E, but the differences
may be a combination of different permeability of the cover layer
and differences in the rate of stabilization due to mode of oper-
ation. Cell E was originally seeded with 27,200 gallons of septic
tank pumpings and also received 7,^00 gallons of rainfall before the
cell cover was placed. The cell gave early indications of vigorous
anaerobic biological activity. Approximately ^1,000 gallons of
water were added to Cel'i B to bring it to field capacity before
the top cover was applied (Table 1). When compared to control
28
-------
Cell A, both Cells B and E show considerably more leachate produced.
Temperature Effects
Although chemical and biological processes are in general temp-
erature dependent, both as to rate and ultimate equilibria, it is not
reasonable at the present time to speculate on the effect of temper-
ature on leachate composition other than in general terms. The multi-
plicity of chemical and biological processes occurring within a
landfill are so complex as to preclude any attempt at rigorous treat-
ment. On the other hand, observation indicates real differences in
cell temperatures with time, depth and mode of operation.
In general, there is an apparent response of the upper several
feet of landfill to the ambient air temperature while the deeper mater-
ials tend to show a much smaller thermal response. The effect of the
ambient air temperature is significant to the extent of variation of
the ambient air temperature over an annual seasonal cycle. The sea-
sonal variations for this study indicate a range of some 20° C over
the year. The thermal response of Cells A, B and E with depth over
one and one half seasonal cycles is readily observed in Figures
35, 36 and 37.
In contrast, Cells C and D, which receive daily applications of
liquid, show a pronounced thermal response over the whole depth with
the seasonal cycle (Figures 37 and 38). This response over the whole
depth of the cell reflects the fact that the temperature of the ap-
plied liquid tended to approach the mean ambient air temperature on
the dates of application.
Cell A - Control Test Cell
Cell A was constructed in accordance with normal landfill prac-
tice and covered after the cell was filled with refuse with no arti-
ficial addition of moisture. Cell A serves as a control against
which the other four cells are compared in terms of the effective-
ness of the operation procedures o/i refuse stabilization.
-------
Leachate and Gas Composi tlon; The first significant quantity of
leachate was collected from Cell A in October 1972. During this per-
iod the first rainfall of the winter was recorded. Prior to the rains
the soil cover exhibited numerous random shrinkage cracks. Appar-
ently a considerable volume of storm water infiltrated Cell A (see
Figure 30) before the clay cover swelled, sealing the cracks.
Compositional data for leachate samples from Cell A prior to
November 1972 indicate, in general, very low values for the composi-
tional parameters when compared with leachate from other test cells.
These low values prior to November 1972 may indicate that the initial
leachate samples were condensate and, hence, did not carry the normal
load of dissolved and suspended materials found in leachate. The
volume of leachate collected prior to September 1972 also supports
this hypothesis (Appendix H).
In particular, highly solub1e e1ectrolytes such as K, Na and Cl
were found in low concentration until after heavy winter rains pro-
duced a significant quantity of leachate (Figure 30). Parameters
showing marked increase after November 1972 are EC, TDS , Ca, Mg, S.O.,
volatile acids and alkalinity. The pH remains low (pH 5) as expect-
ed because of the high partial pressure of carbon dioxide. As a con-
sequence of the limited data little can be said about the activity
within Cell A prior to October 1972, when production of leachate
allowed consistent monitoring. Settlement data, presented in Figure
41, indicate that little settling occurred before the 1972-73 winter
rains. In fact, a settlement deflection occurred between September
and November 1972 commensurate with early heavy winter rains. Ap-
parently, compaction within the cell occurred due to the infiltrat-
ing mo i s ture .
Although both phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) levels are some-
what low in comparison to nutrient content In other leachates, they
should be considered sufficient for biological activity. Biodegrad-
ation of organic material is proceeding as evidenced by the large
partial pressureof C02 and the increase in volatile acids. Methane
30
-------
has been measured in low concentration (1% by volume), indicating the
presence of methanogenic organisms, even though conditions in the cell
are far from optimal.
Trace metals data (Table 9) indicate that Cd, if present, is
consistently below the detection limits for the analytical methods
used. Since the 1962 U.S. Public Health Service Drinking Water Stan-
dard is 0.01 ppm, below the detection limit of the analytical method
employed, nothing can be said concerning Cd as a potential hazard
using the Drinking Water Standards as a reference point. Cu has
been found (Table 9) in the 0.1-0.2 ppm range which is an order of
magnitude below the USPHS Standards. Zn, Pb and Hg, however, appear
to be consistently present in the leachate in quantities above or
near the Drinking Water Standards (USPHS Standards: Zn, 5 ppm, Pb,
50 ppb; Hg, 5 ppb). An analysis of the potential for contamination
of groundwater by these metals must take into consideration the like-
ly reactions between the leachate and the soil through which the
leachate must pass to enter the groundwater aquifer and potential re-
moval mechanisms such as ion exchange, absorption and precipitation.
Cell B- Field Capacity Test Cell
Cell B is different from Cell A only in the respect that Al.OOO
gallons of water were added to bring the cell up to field capacity
before the cover material was placed. No additional management pro-
cedures have been used on Cell B.
Leachate and Gas Composition: The initial addition of moisture to Cell
B was intended to bring the refuse moisture content to field capacity,
thus allowing any subsequent addition of water to generate a propor-
tionate amount of leachate. The cumulative record of leachate product-
ion for Cell B (Figure 30) shows the increase in leachate production re-
sulting from early winter rains (9/72-11/72). The short duration of
increased leachate production suggests that open cracks in the soil
cover were apparently sealed due to swelling, once the cover material
was saturated with moisture. Apparently, infiltration was significant
prior to the natural sealing of the cell cover material.
Data on leachate composition must be separated into two time
31
-------
periods. The first Is the period from 12/71 to 1/72 immediately after
Cell B was brought to field capacity and the onset of the winter rains
In October 1972. The second period covers the time interval start-
ing with the winter rains of 1972-73 (10/72 on). Nothing signifi-
cant can be said about data developed during the earlier period.
This first set of data are scattered and generally reflect concentra-
tions of components in leachates In the ranges reported in litera-
ture.
Data on leachate composition for the second time period reflect
real changes and can be explained In terms of volume flow-through
and biological activity within the cell. Generally speaking, it can
be said that there continues to be anaerobic biodegradation within
the cell, but no significant activity of methanogenic organisms. Gas
composition (Figure 40) shows continued high C02 content with traces
of CH.. Consistent with the gas composition is the low pH, high al-
kalinity and volatile acids (Figures 26, 10 and 11, respectively).
Apparently conditions within the cell necessary to reduce sulfate to
sulfide in significant quantities have not developed, as is evidenced
by the continued high SO, content (Figure 17).
Trends from October 1972 on, for all parameters (except pH and
P) indicate a possible dilution mechanism acting to lower concentra-
tions. This is especially evident in trends for TDS and EC, both
of which reflect decreasing concentrations with time (Figures 14 and
15). Na, K, Ca, Mg and Cl, as well as volatile acids, alkalinity,
BOD, COD, and organic nitrogen and ammonia (Figures 10 through 25)
all reflect decreases in concentration commensurate with increases
in total volume of leachate produced (Figure 30).
Trace metals data (Table 9 show compositions for Cell B similar
to those for Cell A. Again, Zn, Pb and Hg tend to be at or above the
USPHS Standards, while Cu generally is below Ippm (except on 1/3/72).
Cd has been detected only on 10/24/72 when the level was 0.19 ppm,
well above the accepted USPHS Drinking Water Standard.
Cell C - Continuous Flow -_ Through. Test Cell
Water is applied to Cell C at a rate of approximately 800 gal-
lons per day. The general effects of this mode of operation are
32
-------
discussed be 1ow.
L each a t e and Gas Compo s i t i on: General time responses for leachate
composition parameters indicate decreasing concentrations for all
parameters (except pH). This general decrease reflects the basic
flushing action of the water added to the cell. The rate of addition
2
of water to Cell C was designed to 0.4 gal/ft - day. Figure 31 pre-
sents the cumulative distribution and collection of liquid for Cell
3
C. The slope of the distribution curve is 23.6 x 10 gal/month or
2
0.314 gal/ft - day, slightly under the design capacity. The slope
of the cumulative volume collected from Cell C is 16.65 x 10 gal/ -
2
month or 0.22 gal/ft - day, an average loss of about 3^% which can
be attributed basically to evaportranspiration.
The continuous steady application of water to Cell C has result-
ed in a moderation of the thermal response of the upper layers in the
cell as is reflected in Figure 38. This thermal response is different
for Cells A, B and E, and more closely resembles the thermal response
of Cell D, where continuous recycle of liquid also seems to be reflect-
ed in a stable temperature profile through the depth of the cell (Fig-
ures 35 - 39) .
Data on gas composition, BOD, COD and volatile acids indicate
vigorous biological activity within the cell. In spite of the low
pH (^5) methane is being produced at an increasing rate (10%+ on 3/
73). These data indicate that either the internal pH is greater than
the pH recorded for the leachate in the collection system, or there
are pockets or volumes within the cell having different environmental
conditions. In either case, it is apparent that methanogenic organ-
isms are operating within the cell at an increasingly more efficient
rate.
The vigor of the biodegradation processes is reflected in the
increasing percentage of NH. - Nitrogen and decreasing percentage
of organic nitrogen (Figures 20 ana 21). The strength of the reducing
conditions is reflected by the low level of NO- (Figure 19) and the
smooth decrease on SO (Figure )7). Sulfate, a strong anionic elect-
rolyte under oxidizing conditions, wou1d typica1 Iy follow the same
trends as Cl (Figure 16) which generally functions as a quasi-conser-
vative material. However, under appropriate reducing conditions,
33
-------
sulfate is utilized as an electron acceptor and is reduced to sulfide
during bio-oxidation of organic matter. The presence of CH. and
decreasing SO, indicates strong reducing conditions. •
Nutrient concentrations (P and N) indicate that sufficient quan-
tities of nitrogen and phosphorus are available for biological growth.
It appears that the flushing action will continue to remove nutrients*
from the cell and may eventually lead to nutrient limited biological
activity.
The quantity of oxygen contained in the water added to Cell C
may eventually affect the general composition of the leached liquid,
but at the present time it appears not to be exerting a strong in-
fluence. There is the possibility that added water with substantial
0- con e'en t rat i on could be toxic to the anaerobic organisms present
in the landfill. It is also likely that the oxygen would be con,sum-
ed rather rapidly as the water moves through the cell depth and,
hence, only the upper layer would be affected. This toxic behavior
of oxygen would be reflected in the gas composition, generally caus-
ing a lower production of methane since molecular oxygen is known to
be extremely toxic to methanogenfc organisms.
Concentratipns of dissolved materials and electrolytes as reflect-
* ,
ed by the gross measurement parameters TDS and EC (Figures 1 k and 15)
show a rather smooth trend toward lower concentrations. Specific
parameters such as Na, K, Ca, Mg and Cl reflect the same trends. The
decreasing concentrations are compatible with vigorous bio-degrada-
tion since inorganic salts and refractory organic solutes are ex-
pected end products of the bio-oxidation process and should be easily
washed out. The early data (first 6 months of data) showing high
concentrations of electrolytes should reflect the flushing out of
•
readily solubilized material leaving behind those materials requir-
ing biodegradation.
Trace heavy metals data (Tabla 10) indicate that, except for Cd,
all metals monitored are present in substantial quantities. The con-
centrations of these metals are high but compatible with a low
pK and the presence of dissolved organic solutes which can act as
chelates. Except for Zn, no trends are apparent. Zn concentrations
are decreasing with time, indicating a flushing action. Zn, Pb and
-------
Hg are all high when compared to USPHS Drinking Water Standards and
pose a potential pollutional hazard to groundwater and surface water
sources. Recognition of the potential hazard is important.
The rate of settling of Cell C (Figure *» 1) Is more rapid than the
rate of settling for Cell A, 6 and E. Cell C has had continual through'
put of water and the data indicate accelerated compaction compared to
control Cel1 A.
The presence of po1 yen lorinated byphenyls (PCB) was detected
on 3/2/72 at an 0.35 ppb level and O.AO ppb on 3/28/72. However, none
has been detected in subsequent analysis. Since there is no exper-
ience to allow prediction of time-concentration response for PCB's un-
der the conditions present in the test cell, further monitoring of
this parameter is justified at a reduced frequency. It should be not-
ed that in the process of analyzing for PCB's, other chlorinated hydro-
carbons have been detected. Specifically Lindane was found at the
0.06 ppb level on 12/28/71. No systematic appearance of chlorinated
hydrocarbon pesticides is evident and hence does not appear to be a
major concern.
The concentration of fecal coliform and feca1-streptococci (Fi-
gure 28 and 29) indicate a gradual die-off of these organisms in Cell
C. It was expected that natural competition and inhibition processes
would cause a reduction in the active organism level.
Cell D - Continuous Leachate Recycle Test Cell
Leachate is recycled and redistributed to Cell D at the rate of
about 1,000 gallons per day. The time response of leachate and gas
composition are discussed below for this mode of operation.
Leachate and Gas Composition; The fluid routing for Cell D over the
test period is presented in Figure 33- It is evident that the volume
of recycled leachate has deviated by at least a factor of 10 during
the test to date.
Infiltrated rainwater added to the volume of leachate developed
during the heavy winter rains of 1972-73 (Figure 32). The daily
-35
-------
volume of recycled leachate varied from a ] ow of about 500 gal/day
(3500 gal/week) to a high of about 5,000 gal/day (37,000 gal/week).
2 *
The surface loading rates for these daily volumes are 0.2 gal/ft
2
day and 2 gal/ft - day, respectively. Data on leachate composition
indicate surprisingly stable concentration conditions.
Na, K, Ca and Mg show a leveling trend indicating that some
control mechanisms may be operating on these alkali and alkaline
earth metals. These four metals, usually quite soluble (at low PH
values for Ca and Mg), show no major response to changes in volume
during the period 10/72 to 3/73. TDS and, to some extent EC, also
show a leveling trend commensurate with the data for Na, K, Ca, Mg,
as well as Cl and alkalinity.
Continuous recycling of leachate in Cell D has moderated the
thermal response of the upper layers in the cell as reflected in
Figure 39.
Active anaerobic biological activity is suggested by data on
gas composition, volatile acids and alkalinity. The production of
CH. increased sharply during the summer of 1972 and was about 26%
by volume on 9/72. These data suggest strongly that conditions with-
in the cell are somehow accommodating methanogenic organisms and the
pH measured in the collected leachate (pH 5 for Cell D) cannot nec-
essarily be used as a criteria for viability of the pH-sensitive
methanogenic organisms. The strong reducing conditions within the
cell are reflected in the absence of any substantial nitrate (Figure
19), in the apparent reduction of sulfate (Figure 17) and in the
continually high values for soluble reduced iron (Figure 27). Both
NO, and SO, are utilized, sequentially, as electron acceptors during
bio-oxidation of organic material under strong reducing conditions.
The increasing percentage of ammonia compared to total nitrogen indi
cates a more complete degradation cf organic matter. Substantial
quantities of organic matter have apparently accumulated in the leach-
ate as is reflected in the staole EOD and COD measurements (Figures
12 and 13) .
-------
The high values for organic and ammonia nitrogen and the concen-
tration of phosphate indicate that these nutrients are not limiting
to biological growth. The reduction in phosphate concentration with
time may be indicative of bio-utilization of phosphate.
A balance of the major ions in solution can account for most of
the TDS but the solution is sufficiently complex that it is doubtful
whether any useful information can be gained by attempting a mass
balance on the measured ions and TDS.
Heavy metals appear to be accumulating in the recycled leachate.
Inspection of values in Table II for Cu, Zn , Hg and Pb indicate a
rather steady concentration pattern with time. Cd does not follow
this pattern within the detection limits of the technique used. Cu
has accumulated to about 0.1 - 0.2 ppm levels, below the USPHS Drink-
ing Water Standards. Zn ("20 ppm), Hg (* 10 ppb), and Pb (•'0.2-0.'*
ppm) all are substantially above the USPHS Standards for these metals.
The high organic content and low pH of the leachate solution are
compatible with the rather high levels of trace metals.
The rate of settling of Cell D (Figure Al) is very similar to
the settling rate for Cell C, both of which have a continual through-
put of water. The settling indicates, compaction and is consistent with
the apparent biodegradation occurring in both Cells C and D. The max-
imum settlement to June , 1973 has occurred in Cells C and D with
a magnitude of between 3 and k inches, or about k percent of the refuse
th i ckness .
Pol yen 1 orinated biphenyls were detected once on 3/28/72 at the
0.2 ppb level. No subsequent analysis showed any PCB's to be present.
Lindane, a chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticide, was detected at the 0.07
ppb level on 1/18/72. No subsequent analysis shows evidence for the
presence of pesticides. Apparently most materials of this nature have
been either degraded or are being retained within the cell and are not
in the leachate at detectable levels.
Data for fecal coliform and fecnl strep (Figures 28 and 29) in-
dicate that there has been a gradual, but steady kill-off of these or-
ganisms for all cells, including Cells C and D. The data confirm the
37
-------
expected results of microbial competition and adaptation. The only
surprising development is the fact that there is such little dif-
*
ference between Cell E and Cells C and D. Cell E, seeded with septic
tank pumpings, might be expected to have substantially more fecal
organisms than leachates from other cells.
' «
Cell E - Biologically Seeded Test Cell
Cell E has been seeded with septic tank pumpings (27,200 gal-
lons) to provide microbial seed material to accelerate biological
degradation processes, and also to bring moisture content up to
field capac I ty.
L e a c h a t e and Gas Co m p o s i t i o n : Only small volumes of teachate were
produced in Cell E prior to October 1972. However, much the same
as for Cells A and B, Cell E has responded to precipitation during
1972-73 winter by producing a considerable quantity of leachate
(Figure 30). The cumulative leachate volume (Figure 30) for Cell E
has a time response different from Cells A and B. It is not under-
stood at present why the time response is so different. Data for Cell
E shows a slow, smooth increase in leachate production during the
heavy winter rains only tapering off after the precipitation of Feb-
ruary, 1973- The most plausible explanation for these data is that
the top soil cover of Cell E has a higher permeability compared to
Cells A and B. A higher permeability would allow slow but contin-
uous infiltration of rainwater into the cell and would not neces-
sarily exhibit surface cracks. The less permeable soil with cracks
would allow an immediate infiltration of rainfall, but once closed
by swelling, it would be relatively impervious. The data can not be
explained by other differences in Cell preparation or maintenance. „
The general trend of all parameters for Cell E (except pH) ap-
pears to be toward increasing concentration. initial pH values were
around 6 and considered along with early gas composition and vola- .
tile acid data, It is apparent that blodegration of organic matter
38
-------
was accelerated due to the seeding with septic tank pump ings. However,
it now appears that the early biological activity may have been at
the expense of easily decomposable material since data collected since
October 1972 indicate increasing volatile acids, alkalinity, BOD and
COD (Figures 10-13) with a corresponding decrease in pH to about 5
(Figure 26). The increasing concentration of readily soluble salts
such as Na, K, Ca, Mg, and Cl (Figures 16, 23-25) is reflected by
parallel increases in IDS and EC over time (Figures 1k and 15). The
general increase in concentrations can best be explained as a leach-
ing of readily solubilized materials made available by the early bio-
degradation of organic matter. This explanation is supported by the
opposite response to infiltration water in Cell B which, while brought
to field capacity the same as Cell E, did not have the microbial seed
to accelerate the biological processes.
No substantial change is evident in the gas composition which re-
mains with substantial percents of CO- (90%+) and measurable CH, (2%+)
Although anaerobic, the cell environment apparently is not yet suf-
ficiently reducing to convert sulfate to sulfide as is evidenced by
increasing concentrations of SO^ (Figure 17). Even though the rate
of production of leachate is different between Cell E and Cells A and
B, the rate of settlement for these three cells is quite similar
(Figure *» 1 ) . Cell B was brought to field capacity prior to sealing,
whereas Cell E was brought close to field capacity , Cell A was not
moisture conditioned but received relatively small quantities of rain-
water during construction of the cell.
The P and N nutrient levels (Figures 18-2!) in Cell E leachate
indicate that neither nutrient can be considered limiting by normal
biological requirements. Although the specific nutrient requirements
of the anaerobic microorganisms existing in the cell are unknown, It
is safe to say that the nitrogen and phosphorus available in the leach1
ate are at least an order of magnitude above minimal requirements.
Heavy metal content of Cell E leachate (Table 9) follows the same
trend as for Cells A and B. Cd is either just at or below the detect-
ion 1'mits of the analytical methods used and, when detected, is above
the USPHS Drinking Water Standards. Cu is generally found at levels
39
-------
below 0.2 ppm, while Zn, Pb and Mg tend to be at or above the 1962
USPHS Standards.
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
The purpose of monitoring the quality of groundwater in close
proximity to the test cells and down valley from the cells is to
maintain a check on the effectiveness of the earth cells to pre-
vent leachate from contaminating the underlying groundwater.
The data collected to date (Appendix H) indicate that the qual-
ity of the groundwaters taken from test wells 1 through k remain sta-
ble in terms of the parameters most likely to indicate pollution by
leachate. The parameters most likely to indicate the presence of
leachate contamination are those relatively conservative parameters
(from the point of view of groundwater) such as Cl, Na, K, Ca, Mg,
SO. and alkalinity. In addition, gross measurements such as TDS and
EC are also valuable indicators of changes in composition. The data
collected show no significant shifts in composition of the water in
any of the we 11s.
1*0
-------
TABLE 1
LIQUID CONDITIONING AND PURPOSE OF CELLS
CELL
DESIGNATION
A
B
C
D
E
INITIAL
L I QU I D
CONDITIONING
None
Field ^
Capact ty
None
None
Field ^
Capacity
L I QU I D
USED
None
Water
None
None
Septic
Tank
Pump Ings
OPERATION
DAILY
L I QU I D
APPLICATION
gal /day
None
None
700±
(200-1000)**
1000±
(500-1000)**
None
L 1 QU 1 D
USED
None
None
Water
Reel rcu-
lated
Leachate
None
PURPOSE OF CELL
Control Cell
To determine the effect of high Initial
water content on refuse stabilization.
To determine the effect of continuous
water through flow on leachate character.
To determine the effect of continuous leachate
reel rculatlon on leachate character.
To determine the effect of high Initial
moisture content, using septic tank pump Ings,
on refuse stabilization.
* Field capacity is the condition when a sufficient quantity of fluid has been added to the refuse
to cause a significant volume of leachate to be produced from the cell.
** Range of variation In dally application of fluid.
-------
TABLE 2
REFUSE MOISTURE CONTENT SUMMARY
ITEM
Food Waste
Garden Waste
Paper
Plastic, Rubber,
etc.
Textiles
Wood
Metals
Glass, Ceramic
Ash, Dirt, Rock
Ftnes
TOTAL
Random Sample
Combined Waste
A
LU
_1
cn
<
_i
<
<
Q
O
Z
41
MOISTUR
B
151
67
29
21
38
13
6
1
10
47
i»0
E CONTENT -
CELL
C
133
99
28
20
28
17
7
1
26
47
38
• * OF DRY
D
118
102
38
15
28
22
4
0
15
47
31
WEIGHT
E
122
91
36
20
25
18
4
1
13
51
33
Average of
All Cells
131
90
33
19
30
17
5
1
16
48
37
NOTE: Samples oven dried at 105 Fahrenheit
42
-------
TABLE 3
REFUSE COMPOSITION SUMMARY
ITEM
Food Waste
Garden Waste
Paper
Plastic, Rubber,
etc.
Textiles
Wood
Metals
Glass, Ceramic
Ash, Rock, Dirt
Fines
TOTAL .
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEIGHT
A
8.8
10.8
35.5
4.2
1.1
1.3
8.0
9.1
5.8
15.4
100.0
B
10.4
11.1
44.5
5.2
1.4
1.2
9.9
9.8
1.0
5.5
100.0
CELL
C
12.8
5.8
42.4
5.1
2.5
0.6
8.8
11.5
3.6
6.9
100.0
D
9.7
7.4
45-3
4.7
1.5
1.3
9.5
12.4
1.0
7.2
100.0
E
12.0
17.0
35.2
4.0
1.9
0.4
8.6
11.5
2.8
6.5
100.0
Average of
All Cells
10.7
10.4
40.6
4.6
*.?
1.0
9.0
10.9
2.8
8.3
100.0
43
-------
TABLE 4
COMPOSITION OF REFUSE
^•s. SOURCE OF
^v REFUSE
ITEM ^v
Food Waste
Garden Waste
Paper
Plastic, Rubber,
Textiles
Wood
Metals
Glass, Ceramic
Ash, Dirt, Rock
Fines
TOTAL
WEIGHT PERCENTAGE
SONOMA COUNTY
TEST CELLS
CALIFORNIA
10.7
10. 4
40.6
4.6
1.7
1.0
9.0
10.9
2.8
8.3
100.0
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY (a)
CALIFORNIA
12.0
9.0
50.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
8.0
7.0
7.0
100.0
CITY OF
BERKELEY (b)
CALIFORNIA
25.1
44.5
2.2
1.1
-
8.7
11.3
7.1
100.0
•V;
DR. POHLAND
GA.INST. OF
TECH.- GEORGIA
25.0
0
50. Q
3.0
5.0
1.0
4.0
7-0
5.0
0
100.0
(a) Estimated breakdown of domestic waste. Assumes a per capita
production of 8 pounds per day of which 44% is domestic refuse.
(b) Refuse segregated and weighed at Berkeley Waste Disposal Site.
Percentage figures are average of seven loads from districts
established by income level and type of dwelling unit.
* Reference: "Co.nprehensive Studies of Solid Waste Management"
First and Second Annual Reports. C. G. Golueke 6
P. H. McGauhey. Public Health Service Pub. No. 2039, 1970.
** "Landfill Stabilization with Leachate Recycle"
Frederick G. Pohland, 3rd Annual Environmental Engineering
6 Science Conference, March 5-6, 1973, Louisville, KY.
44
-------
TABLE 5
SOLUTION ANALYSIS
Sllty Sand
Determination - mg/I
Alkalinity
Calcium
Electrical Conductivity
Magnesium
Potassium
Sodium
pH
Time After Immersion
\ week
170
30
500
30
3-5
31
7.2
6 months
170
3*
500
23
1.85
32
7.7
1 year
168
48
600
29
17.0
34
8.8
2 years
Concrete Sand
Determination - mg/i
Alkalinity
Calcium
Electrical Conductivity
Magnesium
Potassium
Sodium
PH
Time After Immersion
1 week
170
28
500
31
2.2
31
7.2
6 months
170
36
500
23
1.75
31.6
7.9
1 year
168
32
500
28
1.8
32
8.7
2 years
Pea Gravel
Determination - mg/1
Alkalinity
Calcium
Electrical Conductivity
Magnesium
Potassium
Sod 1 urn
PH
Time After Immersion
) week
180
33
480
26
1.9
31
7.3
6 months
190
54
550
16
1.95
29.6
7.3
1 year
190
40
460
25
2.0
31
9.2
2 years
-------
TABLE 6
CELL C LEACHATE
ELECTRO-CONDUCT!VITY/PARAMETER RAT I OS
DATE
1-18-72
2-15-72
3-2-72
3-14-72
3-28-72
14-11-72
4-25-72
5-9-72
5-23-72
6-6-72
6-20-72
7-11-72
7-25-72
8-8-72
8-23-72
9-7-72
9-20-72
10-11-72
10-24-72
11-8-72
11-21-72
11-30-72
17-19-72
PARAMETER
ALKALINITY
2.01
2.10
2.25
2.53
2.11
2.22
2-53
2.53
2.38
2.78
3.08
1.70
1 .89
2.61
2.69
1.76
1.97
3.01
3-33
3.65
2.56
3.41
2.84
BOD
0.45
0.42
0.37
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.55
0.52
0.41
0.56
0.54
0.42
0.71
0.54
0.66
0.60
0.66
0.57
0.70
0.38
0.38
0.54
0.38
CALCIUM
9.17
9.17
6.25
11.36
10.00
7.50
9.50
11.22
11.08
9.52
11.43
10.42
12.00
11.59
11.48
10.53
10.70
12.73
12.00
8.93
8.04
11.54
9.32
COD
0.33
0.28
0.31
0.41
0.33
0.32
0.39
0.41
0.40
0.49
0.39
0.32
0.43
0.41
0.41
0.37
0.40
0.42
0.43
0.32
0.28
0.43
0.34
CHLORIDE
9.17
9.82
9.09
11.79
a. 90
10.23
11.05
13.58
13.17
17.54
15.09
15.63
17.56
16.98
16.67
18.58
11.30
14.74
19.46
7.69
14.52
21.13
10.04
MAGNESIUM
14.47
22.00
18.18
30.49
22.22
20.00
21.11
27-50
44.32
45.45
40.00
34.09
37-50
28.63
36.08
37.97
41.22
36.36
40.00
30.12
14.06
41.10
-
POTASSIUM
-
-
11.83
-
-
10.75
-
14.67
-
17.86
-
15.63
18.95
15.87
-
17.65
-
21.54
20.00
14.71
16.67
22 . 22
17.50
SODIUM
-
-
10.53
-
-
12.86
-
13.75
-
18.18
-
15.76
15.38
19-21
-
19.23
-
16.67
12.68
14.71
13.64
18.75
16.67
SULPHATE
-
12.50
-
15.24
-
20.09
-
24.55
-
29.41
-
-
-
-
-
45.80
-
-
-
-
52.63
~
TDS
0.72
0.57
0.54
0.69
0.61
0.67
0.79
0.91
0.79
0.99
0.87
0.80
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.88
0.85
0.84
0.91
0.73
0.69
0.98
0.80
-------
TABLE 6
CELL C LEACHATE
ELECTRO-CONDUCT IVITY/PARAMETER RAT I OS
DATE
1-10-73
1-23-73
2-6-73
2-27-73
3-13-73
3-27-73
4-10-73
4-24-73
5-15-73
6-5-73
6-26-73
AVERAGE
PARAMETER
ALKALINITY
2.81
2.68
1.53
2.24
2.30
1.40
0.95
1.43
1.51
1.63
1.30
2.28
BOD
0.51
0.40
0.28
0.34
0.50
0.23
0.17
0.21
0.30
0.35
0.25
0.44
CALCIUM
9-95
8.75
6.04
6.06
7.93
5.18
3.12
4.87
4.93
5.76
5.69
8.93
COD
0.41
0.32
0.24
0.26
0.34
0.22
0.13
0.18
0.20
0.24
0.21
0.3k
CHLORIDE
18.97
19.09
5.51
8.15
18.59
7-51
7.32
6.44
7.48
7.06
12.35
12. Ik
MAGNESIUM
46.61
17-50
25.00
23.40
37.76
21.15
13.89
19.90
21.59
26.66
23.84
27.88
POTASSIUM
26,70
18.83
13-30
16.50
22.24
13.33
7.89
12.34
14.84
-
16.66
16.60
SODIUM
22.00
13.82
11.15
12.13
15.90
9.32
5.95
8.55
7.42
-
9.07
13.89
SULPHATE
-
-
-
-
30.72
-
-
-
33-93
-
32.54
29. 71*
TDS
0.88
0.81
0.55
0.61
0.79
0.48
0.30
0.41
0.46
0.56
0.49
0.75
-------
TABLE 7
CELL D LEACHATE
ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVITY/PARAMETER RATIOS
DATE
1-18-72
2-15-72
3-2-72
3-14-72
3-28-72
4-11-72
4-25-72
5-9-72
5-23-72
6-6-72
6-20-72
7-11-72
7-25-72
8-8-72
8-23-72
9-7-72
9-20-72
10-11-72
10-2*4-72
11-8-72
11-21-72
11-30-72
12-19-72
i
PARAMETER
ALKALINITY
3.93
2.i»7
1.88
2.02
1.98
2.02
1.91
2.27
2.18
2.24
2.83
2.0U
1.90
1.88
2.53
1.65
1.75
-
3. Mt
2.04
1.96
2.55
2.31
BOD
0.59
0.53
0.41
0.50
0.44
0.46
0.45
0.54
0.36
0.42
0.39
0.50
0.61
0.60
0.71
0.60
0.62
0.54
0.62
0.39
0.36
0.44
0.37
CALCIUM
7.69
8.46
6.43
10.00
7.69
11.11
9.00
12,50
9.38
7.22
10.62
9.85
10.59
10.07
10.86
9.42
9.79
9.99
11.23
7.52
6.25
8.86
6.95
COD
0.13
0.42
0.30
0.40
0.31
0.31
0.29
0.37
0.34
0.38
0.38
0.37
0.41
0.51
0.44
0.39
0.39
0.38
0.44
0.30
0.26
0.35
0.36
CHLORIDE
9.92
10.68
9.18
11.76
9.80
10.87
8.82
11.47
11.19
12.38
11.59
12.62
14.02
13.43
14.21
12.04
11.20
12.08
12.92
9.09
5.92
7.69
6.23
MAGNESIUM
21.43
22.00
18.00
26.67
20.00
16.67
16.36
25.00
33.89
30.95
30.36
26.00
22.87
28.43
28.41
26.26
25.69
24.65
30.51
17.86
14.29
20.69
-
POTASSIUM
13.19
-
12.16
-
-
13.75
-
17.19
-
17.10
-
16.25
18.07
18.59
-
17.57
-
18.67
19.38
13.16
12.33
17.39
16.70
SODIUM
12.24
-
10.00
-
-
11.63
-
12.25
-
13.68
-
14.77
15-89
14.36
-
14.64
-
14.58
15.35
10.99
11.25
13.64
11.50
SULPHATE
-
10.58
-
13.04 x
-
12.59
-
13-59
-
14.32
-
-
-
-
-
21.67
-
-
-
-
-
25.70
-
TDS
0.57
0.77
0.55
0.75
0.59
0.62
0.59
0.77
0.68
0.89
0.73
0.61
0.81
0.77
0.7k
0.69
0.69
0.72
0.91
0.59
0.52
0.69
0.65
-------
TABLE 7
CELL D LEACHATE
ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVITY/PARAMETER RATIOS
DATE
1-10-73
1-23-73
2-6-73
2-27-73
3-U-73
3-27-73
4-10-73
4-24-73
5-15-73
6-5-73
0-26-73
AVERAGE
PARAMETER
ALKALINITY
2.78
2.04
1.46
-
1.42
1.10
1.36
1.27.
1.06
1.43
1.27
2.03
BOO
0.47
0.33
0.37
0.33
0.34
0.28
0.25
0.25
0.30
0.38
0.36
0.44
CALCIUM
8.59
8.94
12.03
5.30
5-00
4.33
4.33
3.75
3.94
5.55
5-92
7-92
COO
0.41
0.28
0.21
0.23
0.24
0.20
0.21
0.21
0.19
0.26
0.26
0.32
CHLORIDE
10.43
8.10
5.98
5.71
5-30
4.35
5.38
5.17
3-31
3.83
4.89
9.16
MAGNESIUM
21.88
15.58
11.72
11.00
18.04
9-80
10.79
9.93
7.14
11.36
17.72
20.46
POTASSIUM
18.67
11.62
9.12
10.94
11.48
8.82
9.84
9.38
17-14
-
21.54
14.80
SODIUM
14.05
9.60
7.27
7.38
7.88
6.64
6.82
7.00
5.45
-
13.73
11.30
SULPHATE
-
-
-
-
15.91
-
-
-
15.19
-
21.79
16.44
TDS
0.72
0.52
0.40
0.43
0.41
0.34
0.35
0.35
0.31
0.40
0.38
0.61
-------
TABLE 8
COMPANION THERMISTER COMPARISON
DATE
12-2-71
12-3-71
12-6-71
12-7-71
12-8-71
12-9-71
12-10-71
12-14-71
12-15-71
12-16-71
12-17-71
12-20-71
12-28-71
12-29-71
1-27-72
2-15-72
3-14-72
3-28-72
4-H-72
4-25-72
5-9-72
5-23-72
6-6-72
TEMPERATURE - ° C
Thermister Inside
Top Gas Probe
Cell B
22.2
21 .0
20.9
21.7
21.7
22.7
22.6
25.6
21.3
21.3
21.2
20.9
20.0
19-8
17.2
15.9
16.9
17.5
17.5
17.6
18.8
20.0
21.1
Thermister Outside
Top Gas Probe
Cell B
22.2
21.1
20.8
21.7
21.8
22.7
22.6
25-6
21.2
21 .1
21.0
20.9
20.1
20.1
16.7
15.6
16.8
17.4
17.4
17.5
18.7
20.0
21.1
-------
TABLE 9
TRACE METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN LEACHATE
CELLS A, B & E
CELL A
Date
2-15-72
9-7-72
10-11-72
11-21-72
4-10-73
CELL B
1-3-72
10-24-72
3-13-73
CELL E
2-15-72
10-24-72
1-23-73
3-13-73
4-24-73
6-5-73
ELEMENT - mg/1
Cu
ND
ND
0.16
0.15
0.22
3.6
0.29
0.18
ND
0.12
0.10
0.19
0.32
0,10
Zn
2.1
0.23
0.58
9.0
3.0
140.0
62.0
10.8
ND
1.67
41.0
5.6
64.0
58.0
Cd
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.19
ND
-
0.09
ND
ND
0,05
0.05
Hg
0.0006
0.0065
0.0035
0.013
ND
0.006
0.0035
0.0044
0.0005
0.0145
0.0112
0.0044
ND
-
Pb
ND
0.16
0.12
0.44
1.81
3.0
0.95
0.33
ND
0.60
0.60
0.45
0.21
0.42
ND - Not detected
No analysis made
-------
TABLE 10
TRACE METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN LEACHATE
CELL C
DATE
3-2-72
4-11-72
5-9-72
6-6-72
7-11-72
7-25-72
8-8-72
9-7-72
10-11-72
10-24-72
11-8-72
11-21-72
2-6-73
2-27-73
3-13-73
3-27-73
4-10-73
4-24-73
5-15-73
6-26-73
ELEMENT - mg/1
Cu
0.6
NO
ND
0.15
0.15
0.18
0.13
0.07
0.08
0.06
0.11
0.1
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.06
0.08
0.05
0.04
0.02
Zn
42.0
30.0
30.0
22.0
13.0
10.0
9.5
7.5
6.5
7.5
8.5
8.0
4.6
4.5
4.3
2.8
3.5
3.8
2.5
0.6
Cd
NO
ND
ND
0.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05
0.06
0.04
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05
0.05
0.05
<0.05
Hg
0.0014
0.0016
0.015
0.0102
0.0065
-
0.018
0.06
0.0065
-
0.0035
-
0.0166
0.0123
0.0007
-
0.0034
0.0078
0.0018
0.0002
Pb
ND
ND
ND
0.8
ND
0.1
0.2
0.22
0.15
0.35
0.15
0.17
ND
ND
0.1
-
0.1
0.1
ND
Tr.
ND - Not detected
No analysis made
-------
TABLE 11
TRACE METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN LEACHATE
CELL D
DATE
1-18-72
3-2-72
4-11-72
5-9-72
6-6-72
7-11-72
7-25-72
8-8-72
9-7-72
10-11-72
10-24-72
11-8-72
11-21-72
1-10-73
1-23-73
2-6-73
2-27-73
3-13-73
3-27-73
A- 10- 73
4-24-73
5-15-73
6-26-73
ELEMENT - mg/1
Cu
0.4
ND
ND
ND
0.1
0.15
0.16
0.14
0.15
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.32
0.29
0.08
0.11
0.12
0.09
0.12
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
Zn
95.0
40.0
40.0
30.0
30.0
28.0
28.0
-
21.5
29.5
28.5
27.5
25.0
21 .0
22.5
17.8
17.6
16.9
17.5
14.0
15.0
12.0
8.5
Cd
0.1
ND
ND
ND
0.13
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.16
0.09
0.04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05
0.05
0.05
<-0.05
Hg
0.003
0.0058
0.0028
0.0066
0.0052
0.009
-
0.012
0.064
0.0055
-
0.0022
-
0.0086
0.0108
0.016
0.0123
0.0047
0.0016
0.0008
0.003
ND
0
Pb
2.0
ND
1.0
ND
0.5
0.18
0.35
0.64
0.36
0.59
0.47
0.32
0.37
0.43
0.40
0.23
0.46
0.24
-
0.1
0.5
ND
0.31
ND - Not detected
No analysis made
-------
Tl K8-7U
MENDOCINO COUNTY
SONOMA
V-'
/ NAPA COUNTY
COUNTY
CENTRAL
DISPOSAL
SITE
O PETALUMA
LEGEND
CENTRAL SERVICE AREA
LOCATION MAP
54
FIGURE 1
-------
LEGEND
O~ Spring
f-»5 Landslide
Merced Formation
KJf Franciscan Formation
GEOLOGIC MAP, CENTRAL DISPOSAL SITE
i i
-------
Trench Location
EXPLORATION MAP
FIGURE 3
-------
Original Topography
Field Density Determination
FIELD DENSITY TEST LOCATION MAP
-------
as/1
Hott
• Obl
-------
-J"N
I 1/2 " 01A. PV.C. PIPE :
1/2" PERFORATED
RVC. PIPE
LOT
DISTRIBUTION PIPE DETAIL
NO SCAlE
CEU-'B-
SETTLE WENT MONUMENT
DISTRIBUTION PIPE.
^V;V°'%tV>ISTRI8UTION MEDIUM
•.•''-'•>.y Cell '£,• Sondy Silt
" ""*? -"-^ Cell D « Pea Grovel
CELL'C'a'D' COVER DETAIL
*NO SCALE
2" DISTRIBUTION
MANIFOLD
.rn.i.ij..-.u.-.,.j»i.i..nji.
CELL-0-
4"SUBDRAW
2"PV.C.
DETAIL OF LEACHATE COLLECTION PIPE
NO SCALE
SECTION 'A-A'- TEST CELL SITE PLAN (AS BUILT) |
SCALE IN FEET
COUNTY OF SONOMA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DONALD a HEAD, DIRECTOR
SECTION 'A-A1 , TEST CELL SITE
PLAN (AS BUILT)
JULY 1972 . SCALE AS SHOWN
FIGURE 6
-------
1
.
•' - 1 .
i
l.obo CM. LtKfcrtt
I
i .
^^WWSJpn | Stl 0< toll on Plel<6 ; Somplinj Tirtninol
) 44 ' DlilrlbutlM -—^ j ( L)niimtl«r,G«s,Thcrmisttr)
6'Concttll ft*' \ Svvict BM<- . 2%"7/L Ll"** \ft\ ' X
"•""^ r- -. \ I .'••»",,*;. «,.»... X.-.1 ^7'4l-.»' i*n» « «.», 1 1..." ^^ — \
^^V4 iMclmu RdumLiiu -y\ V ~X-~ r — "''•"'' "' ' " ••I ^ X
X ""ult ^Gos and Th«rn,istff Probei ~J "\
Vs. /'Collwlioo Lim / ^ - ^^^
VX / 27. > -* S ^^
II2' .
; 1 ** Lyilmltri
; ' '8'
; i SECTION 'B-B'
I
^v
(^O
^ ^v
1
TEST CELL SITE PLAN (AS BUILT) ;
CELL 'd COMPONENTS ,
' i
6 1^ 20 3^^^^^«)
' SCALE IN FEET i
i - i
•4 »
300'
,Evoporimittf
\ ^^*. ^^v
Return Lint • " |
f,t
COUNTY OF SONOMA
DEfWRTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DONALD B HEAD. DIRECTOR
TEST CELL SITE PUN
(AS BUILT)
j JULY.I972 SCALE, AS SHOWN
FIGURE 7
« «
-------
12OO feet to Test Cells
Top of Existing Channel Bank
J
Piezometers
Sand
Drainage
Blanket
6 inch
Dia. CMP
Perforated
bottom 5 feet'
Clay
7
Flow Line
of Existing
Channel
z
7/|\V==/7|\\=='
Bedrock
Collection Sump
backfilled with Pea Gravel
CLAY BARRIER CROSS SECTION
Scale: 1inch - 5 feet
61
FIGURE 8
-------
Typical Cell
\
\
\
\
1
f
,
s
r* ' ~i
4 1
J_ _L
x 3
* *
5 2
_L _L
'
/
/
\
\
\
\
Sampling Location for
Lysimeters, Gas Probes,
and Thermisters
PLAN
Typical Identification Symbols
2 feet - Cover Thickness
Lysimeter Located at
2,4,8.8 feet Below
Cell Bottom
C~Q,,
~
Gas Probe and Thermister
Located at 1 foot above Bottom(B),
Middle(M). & 1 foot below Top(T)
of Refuse.
SECTION
L EGEN D
C-T Cell 'C', Top Probi
C-4 Cell 'C', Lysimeter 4 feet
below Cell Bottom
_L
A
Settlement Plate
Gas Probe & Thermister
Lysimeter
Sampling Location
TYPICAL INSTRUMENTATION LOCATION
SCALE : 1 men = 20 feet
62
FIGURE 9
-------
1200 feet to Test Cells
Top of Existing Channel Bank
7
Piezometers
6 inch
Dia. CMP
Perforated
bottom 5
Flow Line
of Existing
Channel
Sand
Drainage \. '\V
Blanket
Collection Sump
backfilled with Pea Gravel
TI I (B - 71)
CLAY BARRIER CROSS SECTION
Scale: 1inch - 5 feet
61
FIGURE 8
-------
Typical Cell
Y
J_
A
PLAN
Sampling Location for
Lysimeters, Gas Probes,
and Thermisters
Typical Identification Symbols
2 feet - Cover Thickness
Lysimeter Located at
2,4,8.8 feet Below
Cell BoUom
Gas Probe and T her mister
Located at 1 foot above Bottom(B),
Middle(M), & 1 foot below Top(T)
of Refuse.
SECTION
LEGEND
C-T
C-4
Cell 'C', Top Probi
Cell f, Lysimeter 4 feet
below Cell Bottom
_L
<=a
y.
A
Settlement Plate
Gas Probe & Thermister
Lysimeter
Sampling Location
TYPICAL INSTRUMENTATION LOCATION
Tl 1(8 - 71)
SCALE : 1 men = 2O feet.
62
FIGURE
-------
(11,029)
10,000 —
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
ALKALINITY OF LEACHATE
| FIGURE 10
20,000—
16,000 —
X
o>
E
I
v>
Q
O
O
>
I2.00C —
8,000 —
4,000 —
1971
1972
1973
TIME-MONTHS
1974
VOLATILE ACID CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE I FIGURE n
63
-------
X
o>
E
l
o
70.000—,
60,000 —
< 50,000-
UJ
O
UJ 40,000-
o
o
<
2
UJ
o
CD
30000-
20,000-
10,000-
N1 D
197!
jT> IM I A ' M I J i J I A I S ' Qi N ' D
1972
J I F I M I A I M I J I J I A 1310 I NTO
1973
J I F I M I A I M I J
1974
TIME-MONTHS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND OF LEACHATE
FIGURE 12
E
I
O
UJ
o
UJ
to
X
o
<
o
UJ
X
o
70,000—1
60,000 —
50,000 -
40,000-
30,000 —
20,000 —
10,000-
•(89,520)
N ' D| J
1971 '
I 01 N ID
1972 1973
TiME-MONTHS
J IFIMI A I Ml J
i974
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND OF LEACHATE | FIGURE 13
64
-------
en
e
V)
Q
_J
O
CO
Q
LU
O
CO
CO
<
I-
o
40,000—
36,000—
32,000—
28,000-
24,000—
20,000—
I 6,000-
I 2,000—
8,000—
4,000-
N1 D
1971
I J I J I A IS I 01N!D J 'F IM'A 'MI J ' J I A1
1972 1973
TIME-MONTHS
0 I N I D
!MIA'M'
1974
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS IN LEACHATE
FIGURE 14
O
o
o
a:
o
LJ
UJ
25,000—
E
o
£ 20,000-
E
L: 15,000-
>
o
3
Q
10,000-
5,000 —
N ' D
1971
1 j' J'
1972
1973
jl7]MlAl|*l J'
1974
TIME-MONTHS
ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVITY OF LEACHATE
FIGURE 15
65
-------
2,500—
2,000-
jj? 1,500—
I
LJ
Q
O 1,000—
_l
X
O
500-^
N ' D
1971
1972
jIFIMI AIM!j'JI A IsIoIN1D
1973
J I FIMI AIM I J
1974
TIME-MONTHS
CHLORIDE CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE FIGURE is
en
E
l
LU
i,400—i
1,200-
1,000 —
800 —
£ 600 —
13
CO
400 —
200 —
NDJFMA MJ
s ' o N o
1971
1972
1973
TIME-MONTHS
J I F I MI A IM' J I
1974
SULPHATE CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE FIGURE 17
65
-------
(83.0)' -(79.2)
V.
o>
E
Q.
to
o
a
to
o
50 —
1972
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
PHOSPHATE CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE I FIGURE is
o>
E
I
z
UJ
(S
o
a:
<
QL
J'F'M'A'M'J'J'A's'O'N'D
0.01
1971
1972
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
NITRATE-N CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE FIGURE 19
67
-------
E
i
Z
UJ
CD
O
cr.
z
O
1,000—
800—
600—
400—
200-
1973
J I FTM1 A IMI J
1974
TIME-MONTHS
AMMONIA-N CONCENTRATION IN LEACHATE
FIGURE 20
1,000—
UJ
C5
o
cr
h-
z
o
•z.
cc
o
100-
1971
J F M A M
1972
I97o
J I-F 1 M I A I Ml J
1974
TIME-MONTHS
ORGANIC-N CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE FIGURE 21
68
-------
V.
O>
E
Q
O
OT
1,600—
1,400-
1,200-
1,000-
800—
600-
400—
200-
N > D
1971
J I F I M I A
I A I S I 0 I N I D
1972
1973
JIplM IAIMI
1974
TIME-MONTHS
SODIUM CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE
FIGURE 22
1,600—
1,400—
1,200—
OT
e 1,000—
CO
O
a.
800—
600—1
400—
200—
\
1971
1972
j 'F'M'A'M'J'J'A's^o'NIc
1973
JIFI MIA I Ml J
1974
TIME-MONTHS
POTASSIUM CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE
FIGURE 23
69
-------
3,000—1
1972
1973
jlF'MlA'Mljl
1974
TIME-MONTHS
CALCIUM CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE
FIGURE 24
o>
E
cn
UJ
z
1,400—1
1,200—
1,000-
800—
600—
400-
200-
N ID
1971
' K D
1972
j'FlM'A'M'J'-!
1973
jFMA
1974
TIME-MONTHS
MAGNESIUM CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE
FIGURE 25
70
-------
I
Q.
7 —
5—
N1 D
1971
I FTMl
1972
1973
TIME-MONTHS
pH OF LEACHATE
jIFIM'A'MI
1974
FIGURE 26
01
e
o
a:
1,100—
1,000
90O
800-
70 C
600 —
500—
400—
300-
200—
100 —
0
N I D
1971
A:
1972
1973
TIME-MONTHS
IRON CONCENTRATION OF LEACHATE
1974
FIGURE 27
71
-------
E
O
O
Q_
S
I
^
or
o
o
o
<
o
io6H
I05H
io4-
io3H
I02H
10 -
\B
\
\
NOTE CURVES PLOTTED TO INDICATE TRENDS.
SEE APPENDIX H. FOR INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS.
N ' D
1971
J I F I Ml ATM I jTjT A I S I 0 ' N I D
1972
j IF IMI A'MI J ' j I A I s 'o I HMD
1973
IMI A
-------
LLJ
UJ
5
UJ
X
o
g .
6 —
4
? —
0
II
4,000 —
3,000 -
V)
z
o
-} 2,000
<
C5
1,000 —
L09_
Ui
RAINFALL--
EVAPORATION
IJ
i::
CELL "E"
CELL "B
"J~T"A"T"S i
1972
OINlDJlFlMlAlMlJljlAlslOlNID
TIME-MONTHS
J I F
T J
e
•6
: 4
-2
- 0
- 2
• 4
•6
— 4,000
— 3,000
-2,000
— 1,000
CUMULATIVE LEACHATE PRODUCTION-CELLS A, B 8 E
FIGURE 30
-------
8OO-
700 -I
600-
10
O
* 500
CD
400-
3 300
O
200-
r-, IOOH
O
c
m
OJ
WATER DISTRIBUTION
LEACHATE COLLECTION
' A' S ' 0 rN rD J rF ' M r A ' M ' J 'J'A'S'O'N'DJ'F'M'A'M'J'
1971
1972
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
CUMMULATIVE WATER DISTRIBUTION AND LEACHATE COLLECTION - CELL"C"
i i
-------
V)
UJ
o
8-
6
4
2
0-
2
4 -
6
tn
U.I
Ui
V)
z
o
10,000 -
8,000 -
6,000 -
4,000 -
2,000 -
,V
N I D
1971
J I F I M I A
I M I J 1 J
1972
I A I S I 0 I N I D
F I Ml A
\M I J I J
1973
I A I S I 0 I N I D ! J I F
I M I A
1974
M ! J
—10,000
— 8,000
- 6,000
— 4,000
— 2,000
TIME-MONTHS
FLUID ROUTING -CELL
"C"
FIGURE 32
-------
UJ
UJ
UJ
x
o
o
O ~~
4.-
2 —
0--C
2 -
4-
6 —
40,000
30,000 —
it
UJ
UJ
z
o
20,000 -
10,000 -
LEACHATE AND WATER.
DISTRIBUTED
<>x/ J "* | i-1'''"
EVAPORATION 4j
-8
-6
-4
-2
-0
-2
-4
-6
—40,000
N|D[J|F|M|A!M|J!J|A[S|O|N!D(J I F I M I A I M TJ [jlAlslolNlDjlF I M I A I M I J
1971 I 1972 I 1973 I 1974
TIME-MONTHS
FLUID ROUTING-CELL "D"
i— 30,000
-ao,ooo
—10,000
FIGURE 33
-------
o
UJ
o:
UJ
Q.
UJ
40-
35-
30—
25—
20 —
15-
10—
5 —
MEAN AMBIENT AIR TEMPERATURE'1
N1 D
1971
J I F I Nil A I M I jl J I A I S I 0 ' N I D
1972
1973
1974
TIME-MONTHS
MIDDLE THERMISTOR TEMPERATURES- CELLS A-E" FIGURE 34
UJ
tr
CC
U
Q.
40—.
35 —
30-
25—
20-
15-
10 —
5—
MEAN AMBIENT AIR TEMPERATURE
l FJ M1 A> M1 J ' J ' A1 S" O1 N'D J ' F MM^ ATMlj1 JT A 'S I Ql N ! D
1971 1972 1973
TIME-MONTHS
1974
11*11
THERMISTOR TEMPERATURES - CELL A
FIGURE 35
77
-------
cr
LLl
a.
2
UJ
40—i
35—
30—
25—
20—
15—
10—
5-
•MEAN AMBIENT AIR TEMPERATURE
N'DIdIFlMI AIM I J IJIAlSI O1NID]jlF'MlAlMlj'jl
1971 ' 1972 ' 1973
TIME-MONTHS
j I F i Ml A'
1974
j I
HI-.II
THERMISTOR TEMPERATURES-CELL "B
FIGURE 36
o
QC
UJ
OL
5
UJ
40—i
35—
30—
25—
20—
15-
10-
MEAN AMBIENT AIR TEMPERATURE
N'DJJ'F'M'A'M'j'j'A's'o'
1971 I 1972
1973
j1FIMI AI
1974
TIME-MONTHS
THERMISTOR TEMPERATURES-CELL't"
FIGURE 37
78
-------
u
e
I
Ui
tr
£
ui
40-1
35-
30-
25-
20-
15 -
10-
MEAN AMBIENT AIR TEMPERATURE'
1971
1972
ljl J ' A ' S ' 0 ' N ' D| J 1 F ' M I AT||Tjl
1973 I 1974
TIME-MONTHS
THERMISTOR TEMPERATURES-CELfC" j FIGURE 38
40-1
35-
u
o
I
IT
UI
Q.
UJ
30-
25 •
20-
15-
10-
5 -
•MEAN AMBIENT AIR TEMPERATURE
N'D
1971
'j' j' A' S1 O1 N I D I J ' F I M U 1 tf j 171
1972 ' 1973
TIME -MONTHS
! D I J I F I M I A I M I J
1974
THERMISTOH TEMPERATimES - CEliL V I FIGURE 39
79
-------
1001-1
CD
I
V)
80-
60 -
40-
20-
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
CELL V- MIDDLE PROBE
CELL'S"-MIDDLE PROBE
CELL V- BOTTOM PROBE
CELLV-TOP PROBE
CELL'S'- MIDDLE PROBE
1971
1972
M ! J I J I AIS I 0 I N I D I J I F I *MA I M I J
1973 I • 1974
TIME-MONTHS
GAS COMPOSITION
FIGURE 40
» I I I
-------
I I
< I I {
I II I II
O-i
.1 -
H
it,
LJ
z
ui
UJ
CO
.4-
•n
i
r^i
rf
^AVERAGE VALUE OF 5 SETTLEMENT
PLATES PER CELL.
N T D J TF MVTA MVI' J ' J ' A'S'O'N rD[ J rF rMTATM> J ' J ' A
1971 / 1972 ' 1973
I TIME- MONTHS
J 'F ' M1 A"M'
1974
I
'AVERAGE CELL SETTLEMENT
-------
APPENDIX A
FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING
-------
ft I I8-7H
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION:
Tor-
vane
1.0
1.0
Liquid
limit
38
31
Plasticity
Index
21
Natural
Moftture
Content
Percent
12.8
15.6
15.7
Dry
Density
iWCu.Ft.
A
Penet-
ration
4.5+
4.5+
1
.c
1
2
4
6
8
10
12
FEET BORING NO. 1
Groond Water
Leveb
MM
••»
•^
•M
•M
•••
•••
•^
•Hi
•••
••H
^M
•••
•••
•en
•••
eBM
1
••••I
z
z
•MB*
•BIBB,
•••HI
••••
z
••)••
••••
••Me
•Ml
•MM
^MB
••••1
•IMP
••OT
DESCRIPTION
%
%
u
%
%>
m
(CD Yellow Brown Sandy CLAY
with roots to 8 inches;
dry, hard.
(Damp, very stiff to hard)
(SC) Yellow Orange Clayey SAND
with trace of fine gravel
@ 4.0'; moist, stiff.
(Firm)
(Mottled gray with gravel
to *s inch in lense; ve|y
moist)
(Blue-green, wet)
Bottom of Trench- 11.0 feet.
• ' ' " . • ':'
REMARKS: Trench excavated with Drott Backhoe. . ~"~
X - Indicates bulk sample obtained from trench
* — Penetration by pocket penetrometer
Preceding page blank
83
-------
FE 1 (8-71 (
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION:
Tor-
vane
1.0
0.9 ."
Liquid
Limit
30
29
.-
Plasticity
Index
15
15
'-
Natural
Content
Percent
11.3
18.7
Dry
Density
Lbi./Oi.Pt.
*
Penet-
ration
4.5
3.5
1
£
2
4
6
8
10
12
REMARKS: -Trench excavated with Drott
FEET BORING NO. 2
jl
!
2
•*•
«••
—fee*
i
•••JM
MfteH
^••M
~
DESCRIPTION
VY
i//y
I
Yi
%
I
(CL) Medium Brown Sandy CLAY
with roots to 8 inches;
dry, hard.
(Damp, very stiff)
(Yellow brown with trace of
fine gravel; grading damp
to moist, stiff)
(Mottled orange and gray)
(lense gravel to V)
Bottom of Trench - 11.5 feet.
Backhoe. .
X - Indicates bulk sample obtained from trench
* - Penetration by pocket penetrometer
84
-------
FE 1 (8-71 (
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION:
Tor-
vane
0.4
0.8
Liquid
Limit
Plasticity
Index
Natural
Moitture
Content
Percent
19.9
Dry
Deniiry
Lbs./Cu.Ft.
is
Penet-
ration
4.5+
3.0
1
.E
f
1
2
4
6
8
10
12
FEET BORING NO. 3
£
"c *
5 —1
6
—i
_^
j
•^^•»
i •»
•n ii -
ii -
nil • i
L^
•^Mk
•«M—
— w"
^-H—
^Hi«e>
• •••
DESCRIPTION
/yy
///
f
7//
i
i
i
y/s
///
(CL) Medium Brown Sandy CLAY;
grass roots to 8"; dry^ hare
(Traces of fine gravel)
(Mottled orange; ^^*P»^f^y
stiff) ' * •" .
(Yellow brown, moist, stiff)
(More sand) - ^ j''
f
(Mottled orange and gray) ;
*' set -;
Bottom of Trench - 12.5 feet
t.
i.
(
V
REMARKS: Trench excavated with Drott Backhoe ^
X - Indicates bulk sample
* - Penetration by pocket
obtained from trench
penetrometer
85
-------
FE 1 (8-71 (
R
I'.
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION:
Liquid
Limit
30
Plasticity
Index
17
Natural
Moisture
Content
Percent
18.3
20.2
Dry
Density
Lbs./Cu.Ft.
*
Penet-
ration
S
£
£
a
2
4
6
8
10
REMARKS:
Trench excavated with Drott
FEET BORING NO. 4
0
% *t
i-S
™-i
-_i
ft
JD
E
o
1
z
1
DESCRIPTION
w
%
w/
yy
%
(CL) Medium Brown Sandy CLAY with
roots to 8"; dry, hard.
(Damp, very stiff)
(Mottled orange; moist,
stiff)
(Very moist)
(Yellow brown; moist, stiff)
Bottom of Trench - 9.5 feet
Backhoe
X - Indicates bulk sample obtained from trench
" - Penetration by pocket penetrometer
86
-------
PE I (8-71 (
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION:
Tor-
vane
0.4
1.0+
Liquid
limit
" 39
Plottklty
Index
24
'
Natural
Moisture
Content
Percent
15.6
13.8
Dry
Demky
Ibt/Cu.lH.
Penet-
roHon
4.5+
4.5+
1
.E
2
4
6
8
10
12
REMARKS:
Trench excavated with Drott
FEET BORING NO. 5
Ground Water
levels
ena
^»
i
••^B*
•«•••
2
^•••BBHB
•^
en*)
••<
•••
••i
•M
•••
eMM
e^«
••e*
•••
••M
em
••N
evmi
••BBBB
»••••
•(••••>
E
•*••••
••Ml
•••BBB
!•••••
••»•»)
*•••>•
••••»
•IBBM
••*••
^^B
rfe^
••^B
••^B
!•••
m^m
DESCRIPTION
i
i
'/A
i
%
t
(CD Medium Brown Sandy CLAY
with roots to 8"; dry, hard
(Mottled orange; damp, very
stiff)
(Yellow brown mottled
orange; moist, stiff)
( Streaked 'gray)
(Trace of fine gravel)
Bottom of Trench - 11 . 0 feet
' •' '• >....• '
Backhoe
X - Indicates bulk sample obtained from trench
* - Penetration by pocket penetrometer
87
-------
MAJOR DIVISIONS
UNEO SOILS
1 > no. ZOO sieve size)
s|
I?
«» D
O.S
o*-
£
o
FINE GRAINED SOILS
(More than 1/2 of soil < no. 200 sieve size)
GRAVELS
(More than 1/2 of
coarse fraction >
no. 4 sieve site)
SANDS
(More thon 1/2 of
Coarse fraction <
no. 4 sieve size)
SILTS 8 CLAYS
LLX50
SjLTS a CLAYS
11)59
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
SYMBOLS| TYPICAL SOIL DESCRIPTIONS
Qyy HJJBJ Well groded gravels or gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines
PH
GP :•
0
r5
GM >l
s
ft
GC |
sw 1
SP
SM
SC ^
ML
CL ^
•*J
%3 Poorly groded gravels or gravel-sand mixtures, littlt or no fines
'•°J
SS
JH Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures
^»
j< Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures
;'«1 Wtll groded sonds or gravelly sands, little or no fines
w
¥i
Poorly groded sands or gravelly sands, little or no fines
Silly sands, sand-sill mixtures
y
s/ Clayey sands, sand -clay mixtures
t
Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, silty or clayey
fine sands or clayey silts with slight plasticity
y\ Inorganic clays of low to, medium plasticity, gravelly clays,
y\ sandy clays, silly cloys, lean clays
OL ullllnt Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity
MH
CH 1
OH 1
Pt |
1 Inorganic silts, micaceous or diotomaceous fine sandy or silty soils,
] elastic silts
ifi Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays
2 Organic cloys of medium to higH plasticity, organic silty clays,
y organic silts
IS Peaf and other highly organic soils
Sc _ _.. _____ __ _ _ - _ _
CLASSIFICATION CHART
(Unifind Sail Clossificotion Systam)
CLASSIFICATION
BOULDERS
COBBLES
GRAVEL
coarse
fine
SAND
coarse
medium
fine
SILT S CLAY
RANGE OF GRAIN SIZES
US Standard
Sieve Size
Above 12"
12" to 3"
3" to No. 4
3" to 3/4"
3/4" to No- 4
No. 4 to No. 200
No 4 to No 10
No 10 to No. 4O
No. 40 to No 200
Below No. 200
Gram Size
in Millimeters
Above 305
305 to 76.2
76.2 to 4.76
76.2 to 19 1
19.1 to 4.76
4.76 to 0.074
4.76 to 2 00
2. 00 to 0.42O
O420I00074
Below 0074
a
z
CL
ML80L
CH
-OH
a
JO 40 30 60 70
LIQUID LIMIT
eo 90 100
PLASTICITY CHART
GRAIN SIZE CHART
METHOD OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION
-------
SUMMARY OF PERMEABILITY TESTS
TRENCH
NO.
DEPTH
ft.
DENSITY
pcf
PERMEABILITY
@ 20 "C
cm/sec
ft./year
1
4
5
2.5-3.0
5.5
4.0
106.0
112.4
104.9
6.6 x 10'
2.3 x 10"
3.1 x 10'
0.066
0.23
0.31
SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC GRAVITY
TRENCH
NO.
1
DEPTH
ft.
2.5-3.0
4.5-5.0
SPECIFIC
GRAVITY
2.78
2.58
89
-------
PLASTICITY CHART
60
50
40
30
20
10
7
4
CH
a
f
CL
'ML
10 20 30 40 50 GO
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
PLASTICITY DATA
70
80
90
100
KEY
SYMBOL
€
a
•
o
«
0
HOLE
NO
1
2
4
5
DEPTH
( f eel )
2.5-3.0
4.5-5.0
1.0-1.5
8.0-9.0
5.5
4.0
LIQUID
LIMIT
r )
38
31
30
29
30
39
PLASTICITY
INDEX
Ci)
21
14
15
15
17
24
UNIFIED
SOIL
CLASSI-
FICATION
SYMBOL
CL
SC
CL
CL
CL
CL
90
-------
1
N
<^/_ GRADATION TEST RESULTS |
LL 38
PL 17
PI 21
JIAT W/C 12,8
CLASSIF. SYMB. c r_
SAMPLE NO. ]
DEPTH Ft 2.5-3.0
HOLE NO. 1
100
10
M
t
RCENT^
a.
31
17
14
15.6
sc
2
4.5-5-0
1
-
-
-
15.7
SC
3
10.0-10.5
1
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
TIME READINGS
SKIN 7HR ISMIN 60MIN. I9MIM. 4MIN IMIN. ZC
„
1
ff**@
IE ^>b)ii
•^t;
5 3.0
1
" iti h -\ -i
^IgBU.U-l
M \ CH
Q 8 8 8 888 885 o
t .• 5 — 5 -
|S 8
I* .0
i1 "
) . T P
y 1 . ._j
5 §8 ^
«T .01
CLAY (PLASTIC) TO SILT (HO* -PLASTIC)
O
30
15
15 .
,11.3
CL
1
1.0-1 .5
2
29
]k
15
18.7
CL
2
8. 0-9-0
2
U.S. STANDARD SERIES
IOO SO SO IS
•
^ S
/
S '
/
S
y^
•
S
f
^
v
*"
.14
•
. •
•
•
• yX
^r
S /
'S
f /
.'
f
/
/
/
M
9 f
PIAMETE
. '
.
_^
^
S^ ^~
S^S
^ *
f
s x
S s
s S
/ /
/
/
*> < **
(T. .5
R: or Wk«T
* • '
^x^1
_x^"
^^ /
X '
/• v '
•" _, "
x
W 1.
CLE IN M
-
-
'
19-9
1
6.0-7.0
3
SIEVE Al
S. '
... •^i^-
^*^~
^/
S"*^~
•~^-
/"
X
X
9 ' •*.:
ILLIMETEf
jj+ *^*r
. ^*^ ^
_^^ -^
X
m V
* 4
IS
\ SAMO
FIME
MEDIUM
COARSE
30
13
7
18.3
CL
1
5-5
4
-
-
-
20.2
CL,
2
9-0
1ALYSIS
CLEAR SQUARE
5/»" **" 1-1/2
z:
=s^
iii
•• : *
1
o
Z
1!
| |
u ' s
39
15
2k
15.6
CL
1
4.0
5
-
«.
-
13.8
-
2
8.5
5
OPENINGS
j" s"«" a
|l||
i.'1
7«
GRAVEL
FINE
[ COARSE
|
|
III I
.2 " t2T 1
0
o
u
J*
Itl
H
Z
Ul
u
a.
^^
KV\
o
se8
COBBLES
-------
COMPACTION TEST
130
125
u
ex
V)
UJ
o
cr
o
120
115
110
\
10 15
MOISTURE CONTENT %
>-
I-
V)
CL
O
MOISTURE CONTENT
:ST
:ERO AIR
(IDS CURVE
V
\!
SAMPLE NO.
1
SAMPLE DEPTH
2.5' - 3.0'
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
Brown Sandy
CLAY
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
2.78
TEST DESIGNATION
D1557-70
MAXIMUM DRY
DENSITY '( PCf)
123.5
OPTIMUM MOISTURE
CONTENT, %
12.0
20
T.%
:ERO AIR
)IDS CURVE
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE DEPTH
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
TEST DESIGNATION
MAXIMUM DRY
DENSITY (PCf)
OPTIMUM MOISTURE
CONTENT, %
'^ &"7
I •
-------
APPENDIX B
TEST CELL CONSTRUCTION DATA
93
-------
TABLE A
TEST
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
DATE
OF
TEST
1971
10-1
10-1
10-6
10-8
10-11
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
10-18
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
APPROX.
DEPTH
OF
FILL
(feet)
2.0
2.0
3.0
4.5
5.5
4.5
3.5
2.5
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.5
2.0
1.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
0.0
LOCATION
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
See Plot Plan
APPROX.
ELEVA-
TION
( (feet) )
297.0
297.0
298.0
299.5
300.5
300.5
301.5
302.5
303.0
304.0
304.0
303.0
277.5
277.0
278.0
275.5
275.0
276.5
278.0
FIELD
DRY
DENSITY
(pcf))
113.0
115.5
110.0
118.0
110.0
115.0
113.0
119.5
106.0
114.0
115.2
109.0
121.2
113.2
110.2
115.0
111.0
108.0
110.5
WATER
CONTENT
(%)
13.0
13.6
13.5
15.0
15.6
18.6
19.2
11.3
21.2
17.1
19.5
19.2
11.7
18.8
16.2
10.9
17.1
20.8
14.0
MAXIMUM
LAB
DRY
DENSITY
(pcf) I
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
RELA-
TIVE
COM-
PACTION
(%)
99.0
101.5
96.5
103.5
97.0
102.0
99.0
105.0
93.0
100.0
101.0
96.0
106.0
99.5
97.0
101.0
97.5
94.5
97.0
REMARKS
i
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
i
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells B,C,D
Cells A £ E
Cells A £ E
Cells A £ E
Cells A £ E
Cells A 6 E
Re-worked £
Accepted
Cells A £ E
94
-------
COMPACTION TESt
120
' 115
z 110
UJ
o
a:
o
105
100
\
\
ZERO AIR
VOIDS CURVE
10
15 20 25
MOISTURE CONTENT - %
CO
z
a:
o
ZERO AIR
VOIDS CURVE
MOISTURE CONTENT
SAMPLE NO.
Stockoile
SAMPLE DEPTH
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
Brown clayey
fine SAND
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
2.75 (est.)
TEST DESIGNATION
D 698-70
MAXIMUM DRY
DENSITY '(DCf)
114.0
OPTIMUM MOISTURE
CONTENT, %
16.3
SAMPLE NO-
SAMPLE DEPTH
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
TEST DESIGNATION
MAXIMUM DRY
DENSITY (PCf)
OPTIMUM MOISTURE
CONTENT, %
95
-------
OTRDUL. . . — -— ,
\
*
f
|| GRADATION TEST RESULTS 1
LL
PL
PI
NAT. W/C
CLASSIF. SYMB.
SAMPLE NO. Co§knSLB
DEPTH FT
HOLE NO. Kaiser
Cojjtr^le |
Basalt
.
luck Sand
Basalt
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
TIME READINGS
25 HR 4SMIN 7HR.ISMIN 6OMIN. I9MIN. 4MIN IMIN. K
too
Z
M
(A
SO
z
UJ
o
Ul*°
0.
-.
1 II
i -
8 8 § 1 Sil^ 6
.002 JOOS .009, °
i . .i
s s
9 JO
1 III
S § 8 5]
37 .a
CLAY (PUSTic) T0SILT(NOi»-Pi.ASTic)
0
. .
Pea Gravel
Cell D
100
t
f
f
f
/
/
• -- J^
/ ^^x"
^
*-^*=-
8S?
4
M
U.S. STANDARD SERIES
50 50 1C
1
/
1
i
1
f
'
1
1
/
/
1
I
•
i
/
jj
,
/
1
'
>
/
/
/
/ .
/
/
f - *
• £S
S£S
^)T
s~
9 .21
DIAMETE
^^
^ '
""
/
v
/
/ ,
/ '
/ /
/
-'/
/
if
,v
y
f
/
t/
1 !•! ~~
r
R OF t
=*«
' .5!
'ART
•• ' ~ •""*"
i
I
f
I
I '
/ ^ '
/ *~f
/ /
/ f /
/ /
/ /
* y
/
/
/
— . 1 1 1 i
0 1.
CUE IN M
SIEVE A
8 , -
y
/
/
/
/
/ ,
i •
r***«rrV
/ *^
/ *f
/ /
' t
f
/
f
/ •
. _/".
, /
f
t
—
•" - i
9 2.3
LLIMETER
^f^*A
^ .7
^ //
v y
.-/ /
•V /
/ / /
,'y /
f /
/
/
"**^i /
f
j
/
/
.
j
/
f
/
/
j
j
/"
•
1 1
•o <•
18 4:
S
SAND
FINE
MCDftM |
COARSE
NALYSIS
CLEAR
1 5/8" &*"
SQUARE OPENINGS
t- /z* 3H 5" •" 8"
.— *~" ^x*1^ 1 •** 1
^* J •"
4
fl
/I
/
1
I
I
]^
^
mi r
•arA
.
/
/
/
j
/
/
/
j
1
j
/
/
1
1 1 1 1 '1
C
of Pipe
nf rAfl
MGQ
fbr'n
I
f
1
9.62 1!
1 1
.1
.S
V
i
egate
a 1 97^
i i I i
o o o o
* ** w <
GRAVEL
FINE
COARSE
,
111
2 ~ 1Z7 t!
o
o
z "
o
bl
»-
z
Ul
u
a.
70
90
WO
COBBLES
-------
iS'iiiS1*"
\
\
\
\
t*83-
2
2.
2.117
• -* —
1.67
17 217
X
2.33
-X —
2.50
X
2.25
2.00
00 1.75 2.58 2.50
X
2.83
—X—
1.92
!*7 2*33 2*33 2^00
*
2.,58
2.(83
X
2.|42
I
2.67 2.
•^
|25
I
2.|08
I
I
I
I
*- -
/1.92
X
2.08
X
2.42
2X25 2*
58
2^5~
-&
-K —
2.5O
2.17
JC
2.(00
I
I
I
I
- •*
1.67\
\
\
\
CELL
COVER THICKNESS IN FEET
Tl 1(8-71)
SCALE : *r inch = 1O feet
-77-
-------
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
1*90" 1*95 "2*45 ~T9"5 ~"
1*95 2*00 2^50 2?20
•
* x x x
1.i90 2.20 2.55 2:30
I
i
i
1
X X X X
2.100 2.20 2.5O 2\9O
1
1
1
1
•k x x x_
1.|75 2.OO 2.35 2>5
I
I
I
1
/1.45 1.85 2.3O 2.5O
.
.
/
/
'
,
CELL 'B'
COVER THICKNESS
SCALP 1 inch = 1O feet
\
p^. \
^r
/
/ »
/
/ 1
--,-, „ , \f , TM _^ r_l_ l t v* $
reo i:B5
1 ,
1
1
l
x A "
2.40 1H9O
1
- 1 1
1 . I
L : T
fBO 2.|10 " I
I §
I !
| |
' ' 1
x -k •
2.65 2..05 I
1
I
1
1 !
X x •
2.0O 2.|10 1"
1 ' ?
1 ^
' 1
1 ^
2. 2O 2.35\ p
x 1
\ ' 1
\ I
x 1
N i
\ |
. xil
J
1
!
IN FEET .* i
i
~ /J' <>
3
j
-------
' ^"^i—^
s
\ . .
\ '
s
X
\J>25 2.0(5 2>»2 2£2-
ijoo Toe cT83 Too
I
1
1
2*67 1.8.3 2,25 2^0
0?92 1.08 0.83 lfo8
1
| "" .
1 •
;" ' 1 "
1.A92 2^7 2^00 2^7
lijOO 1.17 1.25 O.92
2J42 2.17 2.00 2.17
:: X X X
0.183 1:OO 1.00 1.00
• '
2.JJ7 2.08 2.17 2.OQ
1433 1,17 1.08 1.17
1
1
1
• ' 1 . •":•.
X1.00 1.25 1.00 0.83
s • • • • '
. •
'
/
r - - •
CELL 'C'
COVER THICKNESS
LEGEND
2.25 Thickness of Soil Cover
X
1.00 Thickness of Sand Cover
SCALE: 1 inch s 1O feet
.'-.'.' . ."••/
• s
/
s
*X7 2-0€k
"b*B3 0^2
1
1
1
2£8 2|17
: ' ,.| ' ." -:.;.-•
1
1
2,33 2|25
0^12 1.|33
1
1
2 25 2.1 3 3
. ^j^ . - . •" '.j^'-v •. •
108 tjOO
" ' :' ;' : ' ., -
2.17 SjlOe
X X
1.17 1.108
- 'I- ; '•
' • • . 1 • • ••
1
1,92 2^)0
0.92 Q92\
• N •
\
\
- . . S "l-
••' ' • \
' ; : \
IN FEET
-97-
Tl 1W-71)
-------
TI KM-711
\
s
\
\
\
\
noo
1
1
1
1*67
0*83
1
1
I
Q|92
1
1
1
2133
i.kx>
i
i
i
'*92
1.100
I
I
i
1.'67
X1.08
'
'
/
s
f
C
LEGEND
2.42
X
1.00
,
192
1.00
1,92
1.08
1.67
X
0.92
1.00
2.00
X
O.83
1.92
^^ ^k .
1.00
:OVER
Thickness
Thickness
SC
2gp 183_
O.92 1.08
•
2,25 2^7
0.92 1.00
175 . 132
X . X
1.O8 1.00
1.75 2-17
X X
1.17 1.00
1.67 2.00
x x
1.17 0.92
1.50 1.67
0.83 1.08
'
CELL 'D'
THICKNESS IN
of Soil Cover
of Pea Gravel Cover
ALE: 1 inch s 1O feet
'•'"• ,;'
/]
/
/
2}7 1.6*
0.92 1.,OO
, . , •
•
| tf~
2x°° ^P
1.17 1.|08 :
•-•' 1
1
1
1.92 1J58
i**. • - • ^
1.25 1.J08
I
I
' I" '• -' .
i*67 i£3
O92 1.J08
• r
i
.1
1 75 1.,50
^^ . . ^V .'
1.25 1.108
1
-...,.-,
' '• '
1.58 2.Jl7
•. * • • • *!*•
O92 1.0CN
\
V
\
V
\
' V " . •'••
FEET
.
-/&#-
^
•iT.
]
1 *•>
•
^
1
»
-------
--X-
\
\
ISi
OO
2.1
33
K
2.50
1.92
2X5(
2.33
83 1.
X
2.67
2.
1.|75
I
I
I
1.|67
I
I
2.108
I
I
2.|75
2^0 2^0 2^0
X
2.50
X
1.75
2*33
2X33
I
•.''"~ <
2-H7 f ,
iO'v-
/1.83
-K -
1.67
I
J
v !
\ >
s
s
\
CELL 'E1
COVER THICKNESS IN FEET
SCALE: 1 inch ? v> feet
T( 1(8-71)
-------
APPENDIX C
CLAY BARRIER CONSTRUCTION DATA
102
-------
TABLE A
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
TEST
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
DATE
OF
TEST
1971
8/10
8/10
8/10
8/10
8/10
8/11
8/11
8/11
8/11
8/11
8/11
8/11
8/16
8/16
8/17
8/17
8/17
8/18
8/18
8/18
8/18
APPRQX.
. DEPTH
OF
FILL
(feet)
4.5
315
2.0
6.0
7.0
7.5
8.5
9.0
10.0
10.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.5
17.5
18.5
19.5
LOCATION
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
Barrier Core
APPROX.
ELEVA-
TION
( (feet) )
190.5
189.5
187.0
192.0
193.0
193,5
194.0
194.0
195.0
195.0
194.0
195.0
196.0
197.0
198.0
199.0
200.00
201.5
202.5
203.5
204.5
FIELD
DRY
DENSITY
(pcf))
118.7
114.0
113.2
113.7
111.5
114.2
117.2
117.7
122.2
119.5
120.0
118.0
119.7
117.0
119.2
117.2
121.2
118.0
113.7:
116.2
122.5:
WATER
CONTENT
(%)
16.4
15.8
17.4
15.1
16.4
15.5
15.6
16.4
15.3
15.5
15.0
15.6
15.7
15.4
15.7
16.4
15.4
16.2
17.4
19.3
15.')
MAXIMUM
LAB
DRY
DENSITY
(pcf) I
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
116.0
RELA-
TIVE
COM-
PACTION
(%l
103
99
98
99
97
99
101
102
105
103
104
102
103
101
103
101
105
102
•98
100
105
REMARKS
Re- worked f>
Accepted
• f f - i» •
11 ' 1!
II II
II 11
Sand Cone
Density
Test Method
.. !
MOTE: All field density determination by nuclear method except as noted.
• • ' • ••..'••.''
103
-------
COMPACTION TEST
0-iU
115
"S
ex
1
i 110
UJ
o
or
o
105
-
-
r
/
V
/
f
4
/
/
/
.
\
1
f-ZERO AIR
^OIDS CURVE
T
\
V
\
\
\
Ss?
^
\
\
\
\
\
\
10
15
20
MOISTURE CONTENT %
co
Z
g
CE
O
ZERO AIR
VOIDS CURVE!
MOISTURE CONTENT
104
SAMPLE NO.
Composite
SAMPLE DEPTH
From Stockpile
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
t Brgwn, Sandy
*"
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
2.6'S (SSt.)
TEST DESIGNATION
ASTM D698-70
MAXIMUM DRY
DENSITY '( PCf)
116.0
OPTIMUM MOISTURE
CONTENT, %
14.5
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE DEPTH
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
TEST DESIGNATION
MAXIMUM DRY
DENSITY (PCf)
OPTIMUM MOISTURE
CONTENT, %
rnr
-------
APPENDIX D
INSTRUMENTATION DETAIL DRAWINGS
105
-------
Thermister wiring
NO. 3 Rubber Stopper
3/4 - inch PVC Coupling
1/4-inch Simplex Tubing
3/4 - inch PVC Schedule 40 -*•
11B " Typ.
3/16" Typ.
3/4-inch PVC End Cap-*-
LL
U U
1/2"
36"-Stagger Slots at 2
inch Intervals around
Pipe Circumference
Notes:
1. If thermister is
placed inside probe,
epoxy thermister to
tube wall or stopper.
2. Fabricate holes in
Rubber Stopper for
Tubing and Wiring and
seal with Epoxy.
GAS PROBE
Full Scale
II !(«-7l)
1110
-------
2 inch Pip*
2 inch Coupling
SECTION A-A
I i
; j
rd Pipe Cap »f
Galvanized iron
Both CTnds •
i Galvanized Iron
Coupling -v
\
/T^I
-V \ T
*
••••MM
1 . jf
Variable
IA
3 I/'
baB *
ELEVATION
n t«-
SETTLEMENT PLATE DETAIL
Scale: 1 inch s 6 inches
107
-------
Removable
PVC Cap
Plug
p
1
fWfV* X-'i*1
crete Vi.
1
pervious
irbf ill .. n
nch PVC:
tedule 40 —
ed 2 inch
Schedule 40-
Detail )
rete Sand —
PVC Cap-
\
».':
/t
7
L
•-•i
. •
p
MM
k».
•>
V
V
to
. *
6'
• •
;V
»y
i
/
/
/
"/
•".••
•^
••/.
•
• • * *
*'/
L
4"
•_•
36
t-H
VJ
12
p
Stagger 1/16 inch
wide Stats
around Pipe
Circumference
36- Min.
Variable
SLOTTING DETAIL
Scale: linch: 2 inches
INSTALLATION DETAIL
Scale: 1 inch = 1 foot
OBSERVATION WELL DETAIL
Tl 111-71)
108
-------
Monitoring Station
Alternate Monitoring
Station Location
*-* w.
• „ W
PVC Elbow and Riser
with Rubber Stopper
\+—PVC Riser
Coil 10 feet of Tubing
and Cap Ends
Backfill with Moist
Compacted impervious
Soil
Backfill with Piezoseal
2 inch Boring
1/4 inch QD. Polyethylene Tubing
Lysi meter
Variable
4" Compacted
Impervious Soil
Variable
6"Concrete Sand
LYSIMETER SAMPLING SYSTEM
Scale: 1 inch = 1 foot
Tl 1(1-71)
109
-------
1 inch PVC Cap
Impervious Backfill — -*^^
1-inch PVC Schedule 40 — -
6 -inch Boring — •
Piezoseal — ^
1-1/2 -inch O.D. Porous
Tube and Reducer
Coupling (See Detail ) — **""
Concrete Sand — "•""*""
^*
£
^
y
/
/
$
/
-*.
7
'/
'/
I
';'i
;\j
r » '.
-^
*' *.
b
\
1
•
*«
^
/
/
/
y
/
y
u.
^—
/
/
V/////////A
•' :'
r •
'
i'
*'•'.
4"
Variable
12"
6"
f
12"
12"
r
PIEZOMETER INSTALLATION DETAIL
Scale : 1 inch = 1 foot
1 ,0
-------
12"
r—1-inch PVC Schedule 40
i 11^—1-1/2-inch x 1 i
I ' [ Reducer Coupling
inch pvc
ng
. —
1-1/2-inch PVC Schedule 80
Sleeve
1 -1/2 - inch O.O. Norton
porous Tube P212O
NO. 6 Rubber Stopper
PIEZOMETER TIP DETAIL
Tl 1(1-71)
Scale : 1 inch s 2 inches
m
-------
APPENDIX E
REFUSE COMPOSITIONAL DATA
112
-------
RANDOM SAMPLE ASSIGNMENT
CELL NO. A
CELL NO. B
CELL NO. C
Cumulative
Weight
Tons
21
55
92
160
168
180
189
224
238
255
359
457
480
Sample
No.
A-21
A-55
A-92
A-160
A-168
A-180
A-189
A-224
A-238
A-255
A-359
A- 4 57
A-480
Cumulative
Weight
Tons
11
14
78
125
178
186
18?
255
265
336
365
370
439
495
Sample
No.
B-ll
B-14
B-78
B-125
B-178
B-186
B-187
B-255
B-265
B-336
B-365
B-370
B-439
B-495
Cumulative
Weight
Tons
56
118
142
159
176
178
254
261
262
39^
420
472
496
499
Sample
No.
C-56
C-118
C-142
C-159
C-176
C-178
C-254
C-261
C-262
C-394
C-420
C-472
C-496
C-499
CELL NO. D
CELL NO. E
Cumulative
Weight
Tons
10
55
63
145
168
211
252
358
359
420
436
438
456
493
Sample
No.
D-10
D-55
D-63
D-145
D-168
D-211
D-252
D-358
D-359
D-420
D-436
D-438
D-456
D-493
NOTE:
Cumulative
Weight
Tons
80
86
87
105
157
250
259
276
295
338
362
407
432
495
mbers (500
Handbook
Sample
No.
E-80
E-86
E-87
E-105
E-157
E-250
E-259
E-276
E-295
E-338
E-362
E-407
E-432
E-495
unit sample)
of Tables for
obtained fro
Mathematics
Chemical Rubber Co. 1970
18901 Cranwood Pkwy., Cleveland, Ohio 44128
113
-------
REFUSE COMPOSITION DATA
CELL A
SAMPLE #
A21
A55
A92
AloO
A168
A180
A189
A224
A238
wt.
%
wt.
^_
wt.
wt.
wt.
_£
wt.
%
Wt7r~~-
wt.
'WK>
~*c
"wtT
food
waste
7.7
9^4
3§tB ]
3B.9 "
6.2
"29.T
~*50.2~
,7.1
121. 5
15.4
50.1
7.6
~~2l7C)
10.5
42.0
8.7
27.6
12.1
39. T~
5.5
J- i » ^
-i* .-a--;
garden
waste
3-5
"10.6 "
2 2
7TB
~l8Vf "
12.2
"5776-
191 ."4 "
32.8
99.5
0.1
0.1
2.2
~67o" "
r~o~
27.0
5.3
18.5
11.4
37.1
21.3
6T75
3.3
11.6"
1
paper
22.9
"70.3 ~
22.2
79.7
41.8
152.1
26.9
i25.3~"
_18J5_
106.7
•30 c,
-<--• -X
"98.5
41.9
136.2
49.3
1353" '
32.0
128.0
49.1
15673"
38.1
124.1
47.5
150.9
plastic
rubber,
etc.
5.1-
3.9
13-9
6.1
22.3
3.0
-1379"
"l6~.5
5.'!
16.5
4.5
14.7
4.4
"1276""
4.0
16.0
_j.o
4.5
14.5
"375™
11.3
38.3 j 4.1
335.9 f14-6
I
textil<
1.0
"375 '
1.4
5.0
177 ~
0.5_
0.8
4.7
1.5
4.5
1.8
5.9
1.1
2.4
9.5
0.9
3.0
1.1
3.5
0.8
2.6
0.9
3.0*"
7'"" "1" "T "" I """ j "
wood
0.5_j
0.9
3.0
" 3^4
0.7
" 373-
~o".5~
0.5
1.5
7.2
23.5
0.3
~0.8~
0.6
2.5
0,2
1.7
5.5
1.6
5.1
1,1
metal:
5.5
2T.O~~
-2or£
8.8
31.9
4.5
•21 .T
47io""
3.8
11.5
10.2
33.0
10.2
~2"8.0~
6.5
267o
„ 7-9 '
14.9
48.6
6.7
"21.2
7.6
27.0
glass,
ceramic
11.7
3"o7b "
^:f-
"3o!6~
8.5
~ ^Q Q
. 5.1
"29.0
6.7
20.2
9.4
30.6
8.7
24. 6~
12.3
49.5
9.9
31.5
10.3
'33.6
6.2"
'1975""
13.3
""46.9
ash.
Ib.o
"49T2- •
97i9~
_2..1_
6.0
"28."^
~26.0~
0.3
1.0
0.6
1.8
3.1
2.9
11.5
1.5
~4Tb" '
0.5
" O •
4.1
6.9
24.3
fines
24.4
~75TT5--
17.1
"BHT
|5.6
31.5
17.6 _
101.0 "
9.4
28.5
8.9
29.0
13.1
22.0
88.0
13.0
5.4
17.5
_ 2'7
19-9
70-5
TOTAL
100J6
30774"
T5*ry
36472"
^70-r
"573. r
1*303.2
32479'
"27478"
400. a
11573-
325 r?
jA | » &
-35470'
-------
REFUSE COMPOSITION DATA
CELL B
SAMPLE #
Bll
B14
B78
B125
B178
B186
B187
B255
B265
B336
B365
B370
B439
B495
A _
wt.
-*_
wt.
*
wt.
J*__
wt.
J£_
wt.
*
wt.
%
wt.
*
wt.
•*
wt.
%
wt.
-*—
wt.
JL:-.
wt.
•*'
wt.
#
wt.
food
waste
9.3
37.5 "
12.4
"5573""
2.1
6.5
. 1-L
23.5
6.7
21.1
10.8
44.5
19.6
64.5
19.9
75.5
6.6
24.6
7.8
^8.0
9.9
31.4
13.2
~43T$
2,9
10.0
16.7
48.1
garden
waste
6.4
"26.0 "
15.4
"5875 ~
30.7
93.3
J4J_5_
107.0
12.0
38.1
10.7
44.0
0.7
2.4
0.7
2.5
9.3
34.8
23.0
82.2
2.7
"T.4~
^ 9.7
"32.2
0.0
0.0
. 0.0
0.0
paper
51.5
"208. 5 ~
40.6
180T5'
37.3
113.5
_36.i9-
114.5
47.6
150.5
42.1
173.4
1 38,7
127.4
48.4
183.1
41.6
156 . 2
43.6
156.1
44.3
"140~2~
37.4
124.0~
63.7
220.2
49.6
143.2
plastic
rubber,
etc.
3.7
15.0
5.1
22.5 '
5.6
"17.0
. JL7_
8.4
8.6
" 27.1
5.6
23.2
3.2
10.6
3.8
14.5
5.4
20.3
3.8
13.6
7.4
~23.2
5*9_
19. 6~
3.3
11.5
8.5
24. 5
textil<
1.0
~4.0
1.1
~5.6—
0.7
' 2TO
. °-5 _
1.5
0.7
2.1
0.9
3.8
1.4
4.5
1.3
4.9
2.8
10.T"
3.1
11.2.
2.5
*r:.r"
0.8
"275""
0.5
1.7
2.1
6.0
wood
0.1
0.5
1.5
~-5.5~
1.1
"373
2.7
8.5
0.1
0.3
1.7
7.1
0.4
1.4
1.9
7.4
0.6
2.4
0.2
0.8
0.9
~~5T7
1.3
—Kf
3.2
11.0
0.2
o~T
metal:
7.6
30.5
12.0
"5~5'
10.2
-^170"
— 7i£
21.7
9.0
2576 "
11.1
45.5
12.3
40.5
ID. 3
39. 6~
10.3
38.8
8.5
30.4
ll.l
IT. 3"
9.5
"31.6
7.2
25VO
11.8
34.1
glass,
ceramic
11.0
44.5"
7.3
"323"
5.8
"TT.T"
_TI§;
23.5
4.8
"15.2"
8J_
36.0
14.1
46.6
:9.3
35.1
13.7
51.3
8.3
2975
17.8
• 5&-.1-
16.5
' 54.?"
4.2
14.4
8.9
25.6
ash,
SSS-
1.4
5.5"
2.5
-TT.O-*
1.2
~5.r
_ 0.0
0.0
3.4
10.6"
0.6
2.5
0.3
0.9
P-9
3.5
1.0
3.8
0.0
0.1
0.2
~~°"^
0.0
" "oTo"
2.5
8.5
0.7
275
fines
8.0
32. 2 ~
2.1
" 575
5.4
T6.T
_ °^1
1.5
7.1
~22~7F "
7ji .
31.5
9.3
30.8
3.3
12.5
8.7
32.8
1-T
6.1
2.9
9.2
5.7
"19.0 '•'
12.5
43.0
1.5
"Tf.r"
• * # is #of wet weight.
TOTAL
100J6
404.5
"Tt4475
-30T.I
~31oTl
'316T2
411.5
~329T6
378". 6
37575
"50
"315T?
~*3§r.3
"345T3
288. e
-------
REFUSE COMPOSITION DATA
CELL C
SAMPLE #
C56
C118
C142
C159
C176
C1J8
C254
C261
C262
C394
C420
C472
C496
C499
_± _
wt.
_*_
wt.
J-
wt.
A.,
wt.
J5_
wt.
*
wt.
j£_
wt.
*
wt.
%
wt.
• %
-Wt.
_£__
wt.
JL..
wt.
%
wt.
"#
tirt. .
food
waste
4.4
-2971 '
-IIJ*-
43.0
-20^ _
38.6
_U._i
40.5
-^H.
37.0
10.2
32.0
-JSui
45.6
18.8
82. 5
12.0
42.6
13.7
58.8
13.4
38.9
_1°^2_
257o
10.0
40.0
••12±g-
i:35.^
garden
waste
8.2
"54.2"
>^8_
14.5
0.3
0.6
_2^5_
86.6
«_°i2
0.1
. °-Z_
2.3
0^2.
2.8
2.8
12 0
1.7
6.1
6i.
28.9
11.2
32.8
.13*6-
37.5
3.8
15.1
1.5
3,9
paper
32.0
"211.5~
_3JL4.
.141.2
42.7
79.0"
_28_i:L
133.2
_50.2
157.3
^iLJ.
133.1
30.2
132.3
40.6
143.7
46.6
201.1
39.0
113.8
48.0
"132.0
55.5
221.8
48.8
"la&.O
plastic
rubber,
et£. ,'
3.2
" 21.1
_ -i7,
13.8
3.0
6.6
^ JL°_
13.6
. -_5.J_
14.3
_J-i
22.9
8.1
24.0
5.9
25.7
5.1
18.1
— *il'
18.5
6.4
18.6
5.2
14.3
4.1
16,5
5.4
' Ttt.-
textile
0.4
"2.5 "
_3-I_
17.7
1.1
2.0
.^J_
0.1
0.4
1.0
JL-7
24.0 .
2.^
7.5
5.4
23.8
2 JL .
9.5
2.1
9.2
2.5
7.4
1.1
"3.0
1.0
"~4.(T
0.9
Si;3
wood
0.2
" I-0
0.2
0.6
0.1
" O.l"
2.0
6.9
0.1
0.2
0.5
1.6
0.1
0.3
2.1
9.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
1.0
3.0
1.0
"^B^"
0.3
1.0
0.4
me tali
4.b
30.0
. A.7,
33.0
8.2
15.1
-JL5-
15.3
10.0
27.0~
_5-6
30.1
10.6
31.6
11.1
48.5
12.5
44.0
8.4
36.4
9.0
26.4
10.6
"^.o-
8.0
32.0
,7.o
18.1
glass,
ceramic
2.b
iO "
A1-^
49.7
16.7
31.0
-I.2 .JL
40.7
16.5
"44.5
_2-8
30.7
JJ.6
40.5
114.8
64.8
16.0
56.8
8.6
36.9
10.6
30.1
8.7
•T5.0-
9.3
37.2
10.4
""25", 9"
ash9
S?&'
32.9
2L^70~ "
-^•3^
4.9^
0.1
0.1
2.8
9.5
- °li_
" 0.2^
0.0
0.0
0.5
1.5
2.5
11.0
1.6
5.8
2.1
9.0 "
2.7
"E3-
0.2
"!-ZT5"
0.6
2.2
3.5
9.0
fines
11.3
"7*75"
17.5
66.1
6.3
"11 T
_ 5_.£
19.- 0
- 4<8-..
" 13.0~
4.0
12.6
_ 3.7
11.1
6.4
28.2
-l-»
27.5
- 1^5
32.4
4.7
13.8
1.4
" TV
7.4
29.5
8.3
2173"
TOTAL
lUUJb
"^^..B
17775
"lS4.§
"339". 2
"iToTs
313.5
~2987c
437.^
354.2
"^3172
"^9i"7g
"*275.t
"3997:
2587S
en
* % is ^of wet weight,
l?v'*
-------
REFUSE COMPOSITION DATA
CELL D
SAMPLE
DIG
•ncc
iJJ J
D63
TsT Jl C.
DlHp
D168
D211
D2S2
B358
0359
D420
D43o
D438
D456
T\UQO
tJ"yj
i
±. -
wt.
%
Wt.
*
Wt.
*
Wt.
%
wt.
_£_
wt.
J6
wt.
*
wt.
*
wt.
*.
wt.
-*-_
wt.
iJL--
wt.
-1
wt.
*
wt.
food
waste
_ 8_L-4
25.l"
16_*2
50.2
12^1
54.7
_ 15^2
4O
11.2
40.6
11.7
36.3
1Q.3.
30.7
6.1
43.0
_9.o
29.6
7.7
24.6
_6.J^
16.0
_ Ji9_
36.7
6.4
18.6
X . . .
garden
waste
JL8_
" 23.4"
^7
0.5
11.7
49.9
0.7
2.0
5.8
21.0
. _7-_2_
24,5
I'Ll
42.6
3.7
25.8
1^.0
49.6
0.0
0.0
_28. 3_
74.1
2.3
9.5
2.9
. ».5r
>.
paper
_ 58^5 _.
"174.3
46^0 .
142.0
37.5
16076
_J9^2-
121.9
46.3
167.9
Jt3i2.
136.8
45.8
136.2
44.9
315.8
48. 1_
161.1
46.7
148.9
. 33^^_
87.7
54.7
"226.7
42.4
123.2
plastic
rubber,
etc.
4.2 _
~12.4 "
r- *±2
15.1
L 3.8
IT: 4
4.5
13.8
7.4
26.8
_ _4-0_
" 12.5
3.6
10.8
6.0
42.0
3^
11.5
5.4
17.1
_ 3*1.
8.1
-JL5L
28.4
3.3
9.2
textile
0.8
2.5"
1.8
5.4
1.4
'.T.8
1.8
5.5
1.3
4.7
0.3
1.0
OJ_
2.0
1.3
9.4
o±3
•i.i
4.2
13.2
0.9
2.4
2.5
10.4
1 2.7
7.8
wood
, 1.1
3.2
0.4
1.1
0.6
273
2.4
7.4
1.0
3.6
0.6
1.8
°il
0.8
1.4
9.8
Q±3 .
1.1
1.3
4.1
1.0
2.6
1.0
4.3
5.0
14.6
metals
7.7
23.1
[11.3
35.0
10.1
•53.3"
9.0
27.5
8.7
31.6
11.5
35.7
8.2
24.5
8.2
58.0
7_i2
26.0
10.6
33.6
_L3__
19.2
9.6
40.0
15.3
44.3
glass,
ceramic
10. 2_
30.4"
14.4
44.7
11.9
IEL^I
15.9
48.7
,11.6
42.1
10.3
32.1
10.8
32.3
13.5
95.0
10.9
36.1
13.0
41.4
. 13*6.
35.6
10.1
' 41.8
13.7
39.6
ash,
as-
0.4
1.3 "
0.0
0.0
1.1
~" 4.8~
1.1
3.5
2.1
7.6
0.2
0.5~
1.1
3.2
2.7
19.3
0.0
0.0
.0.0
0.0
_ 0.0 ,
0.0 '
0.7
3.l"
1.0
3.0
fines
0.9
r~ 2.6'
4.8
15.0
9.2
39.5
9.5
28.9
4.6
16.7
_ Si.* -
29.9
4.9
14.6
12.2
86.0
4.4
14.7
11.1
35.4
_6.-3
16.4
3.3
"13.7
7.3
21.2
TOTAL
10656
~29~8~..3
309.0
""W.S
"30575
362.6
"311.1
297.7
704.1
330.8
"31875
"262~7l
~414".6
290.5
* % is %of wet weight.
-------
REFUSE COMPOSITION. DATA
CELL E
SAMPLE
E80
E86
E87
El 05
El 57
E250
E259
E276
E295
E33
E362
!
E407
E.V;
#
A _
wt.
wt.
%
wt.
JL.
Wt.
wt.
wt.
%
wt.
%
wt.
%
wt,
%
wt.
wt.
%
_,.
1
— »•• *• — • (
food
waste
44.0
40.9
10.9
35.2
21.9
_ 14 .Ja.
57.5
"~39^4~
40.6
141.2
10.5
35.6
2.J:
7.0
6.8
23.5
_8.2_
24.0
12.7
Oq.7
,
1
garden
waste
31.2
-JL-5.
17.5
8.7
28.0
_46.6_
203.0
~"i7~7i
llTT
1.8
6.1
26.5
90.2
53.4
140.1
42.3
147.0
6.2
18.0
1.9
6.C
11, ol
"a =K" "**
paper
134.5
~155~.3 '
46.0
148.4
71.6
149.3
1327?"
20.8
72.4
33.4
113.5
27.8
72.8
28.2
98.1
38_.7_
40.7
127.4
-??/a2-
plastic
rubber,
etc.
4.4
15.0
~1~4
3.6
11.5
_ JL8_
8.0
"15 .~8~
" 74. 5~
4.9
17.1
3.7
12.5
5.4
14.0
3.4
11.8
5.7
16.6
4.4
13.8 1
_ _»sLjjr ..
textile
4.4
1.0
3.9
1.0
3.4
0.2 _
1.0
1.8
7.0
_i_.3_
4.4
4.2
14.6
2.4
~8~.2
1.3
3.5
1.6
5.6
3.5
10.2
1.1
3.5
4.8
f— — — '-
l6'-(
wood
0.6
1.9
0.0
0.1
0.5
1.5
" ~o7i~
1.0
4.0
~oT5~
0.6
2.0
0.4
1.2
1.0
2.5
0.3
1.0
0.0
"oa
0.0
0.1
-2.
glass,
ceramic
16.7
57.0
12.2
48.0
11.9
38.5
&\0
35.o'
_ 12.8
" 50.5"
~~32.l
9,5
33.1
10.7
36.4
2.8
7.4
9.2
32.0
17. 1_
49.7
18.3
57.3
IT O £5
I f fl
»» "^L^-'L^
3, -=* -=
•f 4 * JL. 1
ash,
" 47? "
2.6
10. C
0.6
2.0
_ 6_._4
28.0
0.6
2.5"
_13aO
43.2
4.9
17.0
0.6
2.2
0.2
0.5
0.8
^ 2.9
JX5
1.5'
0.6
2.0
3Tc \
fines
6.0 _
20.5
19.8
77.5
6.8
21.9
12.4
54.1
12.8 _
"50.8
28.2
4.7
16.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.4
15.8
9.1
28.4
."5 * .™,,
JU Of 1 1
TOTAL
_iqpj&_
341 .-9
1?~7
322.9
""436li
" 395^6
"331.8
347.7
339". 8
261.9
347.6
~29l7l
313.3
~337~Q
a;.
-------
c
err
REFUSE MOISTURE CONTENT DATA - CELL A
sample
no.
21
55
92
160
168
180
224
238
255
359
457
480
total
ret wt.
12.25
13.70
11.55
25.52
8.6?
10.66
12.41
total
dry wt.
7.69
9.80
7.38
17.59
6.55
8.15
10.14
.-j
%
moist
59.3
39.8
56.5
45.1
32.4
30.8
22.4
43
tt
O®
S3
Bfi
OB
o
T*M
CO
o®
8§
total wet
weight £
total dry
weight #
Jfcnoistxire
•
Coinpoait of saaqples*
*>
f*»>
OJ
o®
OQ
total wet
weieht J
total dry
weight #„
jSmoisture
-
Conposit of samples,
% are % of dry weight.
-------
REFUSE MOISTURE CONTENT DATA - CELL B
sample
no.
11
14
78
125
178
186
187
255
265
336
365
370
439
495
total
•JA-f* Tiff*
VO v V* w *
13.45
7.61
7.41
4.94
6.59
5.93
6.27
6.60
5.39
4.81
5.90
7.00
5.64
10 .88
total
dry wt.
9.89
6.14
5.19
4.04
5.11
3.94
3.88
4.29
4.19
2.93
4.87
3.98
5.03
7.96
moist
36.0
23.9
42.8
22.3
29.0
50.1
61.6
53.9
28.6
64.2
21.2
75.9
12.1
36.7
P
01
31
n
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
^moisture
food
waste
10.02
4.04
L48.0
gardei
waste
7.10
4.42
60.3
Composit of samples , J
So,
a
oa>
8§
total wet
weight: $
total dry
weight #
J&aoisture
Composit of
•p
01
o®
88
OB
O(3
01
total wet
weieht #
total dry
weight #
^moisture
13.88
5.22
L65.9
10.44
6.47
61.4
paper
7.34
5.82
26.1
rHa-ah-?^'
nbber
6.80
5.90
15.3
i-11, B-14,B-
11.86
8.78
35.1
8.93
6.92
29.1
textiLe
6.60
4.98
32.5
•78, B-
8.88
6.61
34.3
samples, B-I78, B-186, B-187,
10.92
4.58
138.4
6.84
3.79
80.5
9.98
8 .00
24.8
8.53
7.22
18.1
9.48
6.49
46.1
wood
7.04
6.56
7.3
•125
7.25
6.45
12.4
metal
9.33
8.95
4.3
11.14
10.28
8.H
:eranic
8.36
8.33
0.5
11.56
11.47
0.8
ash,
rock
5.89
5.79
1.7
8.54
7.45
14.6
fines1
8.19
5.69
43.9
11.54
8.00
L4.3
B-255, B-265
7.67
6.40
19.8
9.86
9.28
6.3
11.73
11.62
1.0
5.03
4.38
14.8
10.87
7.14
52.2
* % are % of dry weight.
CompOSit Of samples, B-336, B=365, B-370, B-439, B-495
-------
REFUSE MOISTURE CONTENT - CELL C
sample
no.
56
118
142
159
176
178
254
261
262
394
420
472
496
499
total
»et wt.
6.63
8.75
7.63
5.05
6.46
11.73
8.31
6.48
6.28
11.73
7.90
5.69
6.20
4.98
total
dry wt.
4.63
5.59
6.44
3.92
4.94
5.32
6.78
5.89
4.69
8.10
5.31
4.84
5.23
3.55
%
moist
43.2
56.5
18.5
28.8
30.8
120.5
22.6
10.0
33.9
44.8
48.8
17.6
18.6
40.3
4*
to
O
OH
B &
O Ej
o<3
w
total wet
weight #
total dry
weight #
^moisture
18.60
7.88
136.0
17.25
8.98
92.1
16.46
13.34
23.4
10.36
9.15
13.2
14.42
11.91
21.1
6.35
5.72
11.0
16.34
15.38
6.2
16.80
16.65
0.9
15.48
12.30
25.9
16.54
10.65
55.3
Composit Of samples, C-254, C-261, C-262, C-394, C-420, C-472, C-496,
C-499.
4>
T**>
n
O
-------
REFUSE MOISTURE CONTENT - CELL D
sample
no.
10
55
63
145
168
211
252
358
359
420
438
436
456
493
total
ret wt.
6.93
4.06
5.42
5.76
7.28
8.36
6.70
17.01
17.01
6.80
9.51
8.59
8.97
DAT.
total
dry wt.
5.47
2.94
4.26
4.94
5.90
4.82
5.29
12.44
12.44
5.77
8.28
6.59
6.90
i LOST
%
moist
26.7
38.1
27.2
16.6
23.4
73.4
26.7
36.7
36.7
17.9
14.9
30.4
30.0
•P
n
Q
0)
O
-------
r
r:- tr; rr
I
-ex
cr .r
REFUSE MOISTURE CONTENT.DATA - CELL E
sample
no.
80
86
97
105
157
250
259
276
•29 5
338
362
407
432
495
total
*et wt.
8.38
9.84
9.95
6.67
10.54
3.39
7.00
6.53
2.52
4.52
5.15
4.48
6.41
9.5*
total
dry wt.
7.21
8.10
8.55
6.15
7.62
2.05
4.50
4.59
2.02
3.44
4.35
3.27
5.34
5.09
•%
moist
16.2
21.5
16.4
8.5
38.3
65.4
55,6
42.3
24.8
31.4
18.4
37.0
20.0
68.2
•P
CD
O
OH
So
OS
oca
n
total wet
weieht #
total dry
weight #
^moisture
15.09
7.50
101.2
14.20
7.75
83.2
14.34
11.49
24.8
9.21
7.47
23.3
13.47
10.09
33.5
samples, E-250, E-259, E-276,
7.54
3.32
127.1
4.69
2.21
U2.2
4.37
3.28
33.2
4.28
3.50
22.3 '
M -
%
i
H
5.03
4.23
18.9
E-295,
2.60
2.13
22.1
metal
10.37
10.16
2.1
glass
:eranic
13.28
13.21
0.5
ash,
rock
9.15
8.59
6.5
fines
13.03
9.82
32.7
E-157
12.41
12.08
2.7
14.40
14.17
1.6
11.43
10.53
8.6
8.34
5.61
48.7
E-338, E-362, E-407
3.86
3.63
6.3
4.52
4.49
0.7
5.71
4.60
24.1
4.18
2.42
72.7
Compos it of samples, 15-432, E-495
* % are % of dry weight.
-------
APPENDIX F
MONITORING SCHEDULES
124
-------
SUMMARY SAMPLING SCHEDULE
Initial Frquency of Analysis for Various Parameters
I n i t i a 1 Frequency
Parameter
K
Na
Ca
Mg
Hg
Pb
Zn
Cu
Cd
Cl
PCB
pH
Alkalin!ty
COD
BOD
IDS
TSS
Settleable Solids
NIt rogen
Ammon i a
Organ S c - N
Nitrate - N
Leach ate
*
*
semi -mon th 1 y**
semi -month 1 y**
sen i -mon th 1 y**
*
sem i -mon th 1 y
semi -month ly
semi -mon th 1 y
semi -mon th I y
sem f -month ly
sem i -mon th I y
sem i -mon th 1 y
semi -mon th 1 y
semi -mon th 1 y
sem i -mon th 1 y
G roundwater
*
*
mon th1y**
month 1y**
*
*
*
*
*
semi-month 1y**
*
semi-month 1y
semi-mon th J y
month Iy**
month 1y**
sem i-mon thly
none
none
monthly**
none
monthly**
Preceding page blank
125
-------
Parameter
Total Phosphate
00
Color
Volatile Acids
Fecal Col 1 form
Fecal Streptococci
Leachate
semi-month 1y
semi-mon thly
semi-monthly
mon th1y***
semI-month 1y**
semi-monthly**
Groundwater
none
none
none
none
month 1y**
none
**
***
Baseline data to be collected monthly at least for the first
six months. The frequency of analysis will then be reeval
uated on the basis of the available data.
Frequency of analysis may change as the data are reviewed
Baseline date to be collected at least the first *) months
within subsequent analysis depending on development of pH
alkalinity and BOD data.
126
-------
b
>
V?
b
il
L
II
j
8* •
u
y
u
! U
Cel1 Location
CelI A - Bottom
A - Middle
A - Top
Cel1 B - Bottom
B - Middle
B - Top
Cel1 C - Bottom
C - Middle
C - Top
Cel1 D - Bottom
D - Middle
D - Top
Cel 1 E - Bottom
E - Middle
E - Top
SUMMARY SAMPLING SCHEDULE
Frequency of Gas Analysis
Commencing February 15* 1972
Sampling Frequency •
Quarterly
Monthly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Monthly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Monthly
Quartly
Monthly
Quarterly
Monthly
Quarterly
No gas samples can be withdrawn from these probes due to fluid
Interference. Attempts in January 1972 to remove fluids encount-
ered in these probes were unsuccessful. Attempts will be made
periodically to withdraw samples.
127
-------
SUMMARY SAMPLING SCHEDULE
Frequency of AnalysIs for Various Parameters
Parameter
K
Na
Ca
Mg
Hg
Pb
Zn
Cu
PCI
pH
Alkalinity
COD
BOD
TDS
TSS
Settleable
Commenting February 15, 1972
i ""•"_,
Leachate , Gfoundwater
Cells A
6-week
6-week
6 -week
6 -week
6-week
6-week
6-week
6-week
6-week
6-week
6-week
6-week
6-week
6-week
6-week
C A 1 1 «l e - - - - -
, B ft € ^ells C * D
intervals
intervals
intervals
intervals
intervals
intervals
intervals
intervals
intervals
intervals
Intervals
intervals
intervals
intervals
intervals
monthly
monthly
semi-monthly
. semi-monthly
monthly
monthly
monthly
monthly
semi -monthly
quarterly
semi-monthly
semi-monthly
semi-monthly
semi-monthly
semi-monthly
semi-monthly
quarterly
Wells 1 thru *»
A & E Subdraln
Water Supply
Cell C
quarterly ^
. quarterly. ^
' quarterly "" - '
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
semi -annual ly
month ly
quarterly
quarterly
semi-annual ly
quarterly
quarterly
Nitrogen
Ammon i a
Organic N
Nitrate N
Sulphate
Tot. Phosphate
DO
Color
Volatile Acids
Fecal coliform
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
quarterly
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
quarterly
Elect. Conductivity 6-week intervals
Fecal Streptococci semi-annually
semi-monthly
semi-monthly
semi-monthly
quarterly
semi-monthly
semi-monthly
semi-monthly
monthly
quarterly
semi-monthly
semi-annually
semi-annually
semi-annually
quarterly
monthly
semi-annually
monthly
semi"annually
^Initial test of Cell A leachate will include all parameters listed in
December 1971 schedule In addition to those listed above,
128
-------
SAMPLING SCHEDULE
Frequency of Fluid Sampljng & Analysis
Revised May, 1973
Parameter
Leachate
Cells A, B 6 E
Cells C & D
G roundwater
Wells 1 thru k*
A £ E Subdrain*
Water Supply
Cel 1 C
Alkalin!ty
B.O.D.
Cadmiurn
Ca1c i urn
C.O.D.
Chloride
Copper
o-week Intervals
6-week Intervals
6-week i nterva1s
6-week i n te rva1s
6-week i nte rva1s
6-week Intervals
3-week intervals
3-week intervals
6-week intervals
3-week intervals
3-week intervals
3-week i n te rva1s
6-week intervals
6-week i n te rva1s
Dissolved Oxygen 6-week intervals 3~week intervals
Electri cal
Conductivity 6-week intervals 3-week intervals
Fecal Coliform semi-annually semi-annua11y
Fecal Streptococci semi-annually semi-annually
Iron 6-week intervals 6-week intervals
Lead 6-week intervals 6-week intervals
Magnesium 6-week intervals 3-week intervals
Mercury 6-week intervals 6-week intervals
Nitrogen-Ammonia 6-week interva1s 3-week intervals
Nitrogen-Organic 6-week intervals 3-week intervals
Nitrogen-Nitrate 6-week intervals 3-week intervals
Phosphate-total ,
as P 6-week intervals
P.C.B.
Potass i urn
Sodium
Sol 5 ds-Total
DIssolved
semi-annua11y
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
3-week i n te rva1s
semi-annual 1y
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals 3-week intervals
quarterly
quarter ly
quarterly
6-week intervals
6-week i nte rva1s
3-week intervals
Sol ids-Settleable
Total Sulphide quarterly
Sulphate quarterly
Volatile Acids 6-week intervals
Zinc 6-week intervals
pH 6-week intervals
quarterly
sem i-annua11y
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
semi-annua11y
semi-annua1ly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
semi-annually
semi-annually
(9nly if detected
in eel 1 s)
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
6-week intervals
*D.O., E.C. 6 pH to be run quarterly on Well *» and A 6 E Subdrain.
129
-------
SAMPLING SCHEDULE
Frequency of Gas SampHng6AnalysI
Revised May, 1973
Gas Probe Location
Cell A - Middle
Cell B - Middle
Cell C - Bottom
CelID- Top
Cel1 E - Middle
Sampling Frequency
6-week Intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
6-week intervals
130
-------
APPENDIX
"". ANALYTICAL METHODS AND PROCEDURES
w • ' FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF LEACHATE,
•L GROUNDWATER AND GAS SAMPLES FROM
"4^ SONOMA COUNTY CENTRAL DISPOSAL SITE
j SANITARY LANDFILL TEST CELLS
i f
"w
^ December 1971
Revised February 1972
-w Revised June 1972
» Revised June 1973
131
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GENERAL
SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND PREANALYTICAL PREPARATION
Sampling Procedures
Sample Procurement
Sample Preservation
ANALYTICAL METHODS AND PROCEDURES
Detection Limits
Alkalinity
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
Calcium and Magnesium
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Chloride
Color
Dissolved Oxygen
Electro-Conductivity
Fecal Coliform
Fecal Streptococci
Gas Analysis
Heavy Metals
Nitrogen
Ammonia
Organic Nitrogen
Nitrate Nitrogen
pH Measurement
Phosphate (total)
Polychlbrinated Btphenyls
Sodium and Potassium
Sulphate
Settleable Solids
Total Dissolved Solids
Total Suspended Solids
Volatile Acids
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Page
133
133
133
134
134
135
135
136
1?6
137
137
138
138
138
140
141
142
142
143
146
146
147
147
150
152
155
155
156
156
156
156
157
132
-------
GENERAL
Unless specifically noted, each analytical method is used to determine
the specific constituent in ail aqueous samples involved in this investigation.
The taking, handling, and preservation of samples prior to analysis will vary
according to the nature of the sample and constituent to be measured. Pre-
analytlcal preparations may require acidification, dilution, addition of a
preservative,or filtration, to name some possibilities.
The samples handled in this research project include a broad range
of concentrations and sample conditions. The analytical problems encountered
Include predicting the proper dilution ratio when samples are too concentrated,
estimating sample volumes when low concentration of a given constituent is
expected, and changing analytical procedures or methods when interferences
occur. It may sometimes be necessary to use several methods for the same
species, shifting the method to suit the special sample conditions.
SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND PREANALYTICAL PREPARATION
Sampling Procedures
In all cases and at all times taking and handling samples should be
done In a manner which reduces to a minimum the possibilities for contamination
and at the same time reduces to a minimum the time between sampling and analysis.
The importance of conducting analysis as soon after sampling has been completed
cannot be overemphasized.
Since there will be a significant time interval (several hours)
between sampling and analysis, the samples for certain time dependent tests
must be preserved in some manner to assure that the error due to chemical and
biological change is held to a minimum. The methods used in this investigation
are generally accepted and widely used (1, 2).
-------
Sample Procurement
Samples, with the exception of those obtained for bacteriological
tests, are collected In all-glass bottles with caps haying plastic or foil
liners. The glass sample bottles are prepared for use by rinsing in warm
dilute HC1 followed by a rinse with tap water.and several rinses in distilled
water. When sufficient sample volume.is available, the bottle Is rinsed at
least once with the sample fluid before filling the bottle .to overflow capacity.
The samples are then prepared according to specific preanalytical procedures
described below.
Samples taken for bacteriological tests are collected in 125 ml plastic
bottles with plastic caps. The bottles are prepared In the laboratory before-
hand by washing and sterilization as described In Standard Methods (pg. 403).
Sample Preservation
Depending upon the test series to be run, from one to four
samples are taken from each source for chemical analysis. All samples are
stored on ice or under refrigeration at or below *» c until tested. A pre-
servative, HgCl-f in a concentration of *tO mg/1 of sample is added to samples
to be tested for the following components:
Alkalinity Ammonla-N Sulphate
Chemical Oxygen Demand Organic-N Total Dissolved Solids
Calcium Nitrate-N Total Suspended Sol ids
Magnesium Phosphate Settleable Solids
Color Volatile Acids
* Hereinafter reference to Standard Methods indicates Reference 1
134
-------
u
The detection limits listed below arc the minimum detection limit*
valid for normal operating procedures in the laboratory. This list is
provided as a guide for the evaluation of th* analytical procedures.
• \ > . : 'V :- '';.. •'''! I'O ,? •?• .•.;.:•.? ,'
* Comoonent Detection
- vWtflfVI H*l 1 W ww-™^— ••— • •— -^ (
; - — • ^ -trtttfv.'.' ''^. • ••
i , •
W Cd 0.05
Cu 0.02
I , • .v.-.J i. •
-^ . Fe ^ - . • • ,•::,- ^0-v..-:-,^-,;--v-:
Hg ..:-.-.'W: JM5^7? .-.. • .,;,;
L K ' 0.1
*•* • . '• ••••.<:>•>& "s..>> ^o; •'.'-.-•• i .-•-; -1
1 Mig 0.05
.; ; Mn ' 0.1 . -^' •;•
^^^ .. A AC
' -Na •. .-.. . • -r. ;7.- "-:••;>?• •:&$*^wAf\u ,:ni';U
j l . . ". Pb . .'. ._ ,0.1
'\ 4 -' ' •"• ' '" • • .'"•. -; -": •:•' ' i;> \-; j w ;is 31*; ,V J S^ 7 • " '"' -, •'•
w Zn 0<01
•j r< •• ' •' ' alkalinity -.•••• -:- -"••'* -£\^ ^•.'u.-i--. •.-.•;
'•' W . ' , BOD '.'.,'• •''. ;.;-.«" rll ti>f-1fo^?v -V"- V!
Ca 1
' :• ' ; '.-"..' •-'. '}^^r:^^ B .•; VKV. s..>;; '' ,- ^.- •-
U COD '
J ' Color' ' • • " j,<-e^,r^ ,:••:••'.
\ Vf- ' Cl ^.HO'-!Jj;a ooa a.,TA>'.:-:
,! W<
Dissolved Oj v;-|.; v-. ^^P^^ ;-
:;-; '' , .Nitrogen - NH- :'.!£•: ,.. 0^5 .i:-l-..i'L;-;-L.
J y j • .. * f .... .,., ' ;. .(
Nitrogen - Orgatilc ; 0.5
v Phosphate (as P) ^ 0.5
! -^ Solids - TS ^ 5
i • , . Solids - IDS ? 5
U Solids - TSS 5
. : Solids - Settleable 0.2
1 U s°j, ' :" 5
W <|
Volatile acids 50
Unit
mg/1
•" mg/ih '•'-•--v'--'- •••
• * . «
- -flig/Ttr.; .• !.'- ':'-: r
>H9/V ;
mg/1
"'•".•.•;.(' - , i
nig/1
•••••ing/iv' ^ ^- -..:-
ma/ 1
.-;:^^?j-!;:;v.l; 'KM
mg/1
"-" 'mg/t "'T': '
mg/i as CaCO^
, ^
mg/1
mg/1 '
color units
- m9/1
,!r,.mgt?tft.,,._
•|r- rtg/loas -»:•);:;-.;
»-T -- »»Wy. ,^>j ..»,...- ^. . :,„.,., ,^,. ,, ...u,, -..
mg/1 as N
mg/1 as P
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
' i' -. .'•!••
ml/I; •
mg/i
mjg/1
U
135
-------
ANALYTICAL METHODS AND PROCEDURES
Alkalinity
Alkalinity is determined by potent lometr I c titratlon using a pH of
4.2 as the end point. The general method described In Standard Methods
(page 52) is used* A sample size of 50 or 100 ml Is used, depending on the
alkalinity of the sample. For samples of high alkalinity a 10 ml sample Is
diluted up to 50 or 100 ml and then titrated.
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
/
The biochemical, oxygen demand (BOD) determination is conducted
according to the procedure given in Standard Methods (page 489). The direct
pipetfng or dilution method js selected for preparing BOD samples based upon
the estimated ultimate 5-day BOD.
For samples containing unknown BOD strengths it is necessary to
prepare a range of dilutions so that the actual value will be bracketed.
Generally three dilutions are required to assure adequate coverage of range.
If the BOD can be reasonably estimated, the range of dilutions can be narrowed
somewhat, but it Is usual 1y best to take a conservative approach. The follow-
ing table will aid in preparing dilutions:
ESTIMATED BOD DILUTONS*
0.05 12,000 - 42,000
0.10 6,000 - 20,000
0.20 3,000 - 10,000
0.50 1,200 - 4,200
1.0 600 - 2,000
2.0 300 - 1,000
5>0 100 - 400
10.0 60- 200
20.0 30-100
50.0 10 - 40
100.0 5 - 20
300.0 0 - 7
* Modified and shortened from Sawyer R McCarty, Chemistry for Sanitary
Engineers, McG/aw-HilJ. 2nd ed.., 1967-
136
-------
Calcium and Magnesium
The concentrations of calcium and magnesium are determined by
complexometric titration with EDTA. There Is the strong possibility of
Interference from dissolved heavy metals (e.g., Cu, Zn, Ni, Fe, Pb). This
interference is overcome by complex ing the metals with cyanide. Routine
addition of sodium cyanide solution is utilized to prevent potential metallic
Interference. The procedure is described in Standard Methods (page 181). When
sample volumes to not permit titration techniques, Atomic Absorption Spectro-
photometry (AAS) should be used to conserve the sample volume for measurement
of other parameters. The methods described in Standard Methods (page 211) and
elsewhere can be used. Where highly colored leachate samples are obtained
It may be necessary to analyze Ca and Mg by AAS to avoid color Interferences
with the EDTA method.
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
The dichromate reflux method, Standard Methods (page 495). has been
selected for the chemical oxygen demand (COD) determination because It has
advantages over other oxldants in oxidizabi1ity, applicability to a wide
variety of samples, and ease of manipulation.
The test Is performed with the following modifications:
1. Sample and reagent volumes used are 20 ml aliquot of sample, 10 ml
of 0.5N K.Cr 0 and 30 ml of H.SO. containing Ag SO. .
2. The maximum COD concentration which can be determined using the
20 ml aliquot sample is 2000 mg/1; for COD concentrations greater
then 2000 mg/1, smaller volumes of sample diluted up to 20 ml with
distilled water should be used.
* CAUTI ON; Cyanide is a strong poison and great care should be exercised
when handling.
137
-------
3. The standard ferrous ammonium sulfate tltrant should be approxi-
mately 0.10N In concentration. Frequent standardization Is required.
k. When the data indicate a COO consistently below 500 mg/1, the normal
procedure described in Standard Methods (page *»95) is to be employed.
Chloride
Because of the interferences expected in leachate samples, the
method used for chloride analysis is the Mercuric Nitrate procedure. It is ex-
pected that orthophosphate, sulfide, and sulfite ions will be in sufficient
concentrations so as to interfere with the Argentometric titration technique.
The procedure as outlined in Standard Methods (page 97) is used. The presence
of sulfltes interferes. If the presence is suspected, oxidize by treating
50 ml sample with 0.5 to 1.0 ml of 30 percent H20». This method Is used for
both leachate and groundwater samples.
Experience has indicated that potentiometric titration of Cl with
a Ag/AgCl electrode system is the best procedure when color interference is
too great to allow colorimetric determinations. Discussions of potentiometric
titration techniques for Cl are readily available (12, 13)-Both methods are used
for chloride analysis depending on the color interference. The procedure in
Standard Methods (pg 377) is used for potentiometric titration of Cl.
Color
<
Color is measured according to the Platinum-Cobalt method described
in Standard Methods (page 160).
Dissolved Oxygen (DO)
Most leachate samples are highly colored and it is therefore not
possible to use the Winkler Method of analysis. A field oxygen probe is used
for in-situ measurement of oxygen in both leachate and groundwater samples.
138
-------
Dissolved oxygen is measured In the field using a battery operated
: Yellow Springs Instrument Co., Model 51A Dissolved Oxygen Meter. The Instru-
•* • •• • '
ment is equipped with a combination temperature, oxygen probe. Temperature
* can be read to 0.3° C and dissolved oxygen can be read to 0.1 ppm.
\ Below is a detailed description for use by field personnel who will
» be making the in-situ DO measurements:
1. Calibration of DO meter.
K' -
a. Check the probe to assure the membrane is not damaged. Should
the membrane be damaged, it can be replaced following the pro-
rt . '..''-.
cedures outlined under "Preparation for Operation" In the
Instruction manual.
J
b. Connect the probe cables to the instrument. The oxygen-temperature
probes have two connectors of different sizes so they cannot be
it - ' ''•-'.
incorrectly attached to the Instrument.
c. With the instrument OFF check mechanical zero of meter and adjust
if necessary with the screwdriver adjustment in the lower center
of the meter bezel. Perform the adjustment with the instrument
In the position it will be used.
' ' d. Turn the selector switch to ZERO and adjust the meter to zero
«• •
with ZERO adjustment knob.
e. Turn the selector switch to FULL SCALE and adjust the meter to the
full scale position (15 ppm on the meter). If the meter cannot be
• adjusted to full scale, replace the batteries. ' '
j '..-'_' '
f. Set the selector switch to CALIB Q£ with the probe in an envlron-
' ment of 100 percent relative humidity. This can be accomplished
by placing the probe in the storage container partially filled
• * with water, taking care that the membrane is not immersed. Leave
the probe in this position for a period of 5 minutes to polarize
it before making further calibratIons or measurements.
! •» '
g. With the CALIB knob, set the meter pointer to the mark for the
local altitude.
139
-------
2. Measurement of Sample 00 Content.
a. Calibrate DO meter as outlined in calibration procedures.
b. Place the probe in the water sample at the measurement site. To
induce a flow of water across the membrane, raise and lower the
probe.
c. Turn the selector switch to TEMP and read the temperature from ^
the lower meter scale. Record temperature.
d. Set the 02 SOLUBILITY FACTOR dial to the observed temperature,
taking care to use the appropriate salinity index (each section
of the bar on the 02 SOLUBILITY FACTOR dial represents 5,000 ppm
chloride concentration.) Previous analytical data on chloride
concentration should be used to estimate appropriate salinity
Index setting.
e. Turn the switch to 02 and read the dissolved oxygen value In
ppm directly from the meter dial. RecordI dissolved oxygen value.
f. To perform a series of measurements in a short time at about the
same temperature (within 5° C of calibration temperature), re-
•; calibration Is not required and performance will not be degraded.
To take readings, simply repeat steps b, c, d, and e.
Electro-Conductivity (EC)
Electro conductivity is measured in the field using a battery operated
Beckman, Type RB3, Solu Bridge. The instrument is equipped with three conduc-
tivity probe cells which provide a measurement range of from 50 to 200,000 micro-
mhos/cm. .
Below Is a detailed description for use by field personnel who will
be making the In-sltu E. C. measurements:
1. Check the battery by depressing the battery check switch and the
ON-OFF button simultaneously. The needle of the battery check meter
should deflect to the right (positive) and come to rest In the green
zone.
140
-------
2. Set the manual temperature compensator to the solution temperature
as measured by a thermometer or the reading from the 0.0. meter.
Record the temperature of the sample.
3. Connect the two lead wires of the conductivity probe cell to the
two Instrument terminals. Either lead wire can be connected to
either terminal.
A. Remove the protective end cap and Immerse the conductivity probe
cell In the solution to be tested to a point at least one-half
Inch above the cell air vent. Move the cell up and down in the
solution once or twice to insure removal of air bubbles from within
the cell.
5. While depressing the ON-OFF button, rotate the main scale knob until
the meter needle is opposite zero on the scale. Release the button.
6. Read the scale value opposite the index mark on the main scale knob.
Determine the electro-conductivity by applying the appropriate con-
ductivity probe cell factor to the scale value. Record electro
conductivity.
7. Results can be checked by using another conductivity probe cell. The
probe that provides a reading nearest the middle range of the scale
should be used.
8. Clean the probe before storing by rinsing with tap water several times.
If this is not done, a film may build up on the probe.
Fecal Col I form
The multiple tube dilution technique is used for the Fecal Coliform
Test. Lactose broth is used for the presumptive test. The confirmed test
utilizes the boric acid lactose broth. Details are given in Standard Methods
(page 669). Data are reported as Most Probable Number (MPN) per 100 ml with a
95% confidence limit.
141
-------
Fecal Streptococci
The Multiple-Tube Technique is used for Fecal Streptococci analysis.
The Membrane Filter Technique could be used equally well. The procedure used
for the presumptive test, confirmed test, and forvcomputing and recording the
MPN per 100 ml of the samples is given in Standard Methods (page 689).
Gas Analysis
Gas samples from the landfill cells are collected in the field and
are analyzed in the laboratory using a gas chromatograph system for gas-liquid
partition chromatography. The gases analyzed for are C^i CH. , N2, H_S, 0_.
Sampling Procedure: Gas samples are collected in the field in 250 ml
glass gas sampling tubes. The principle is to draw the gas sample into and
through the sample tube under a vacuum and to seal the container when a repre-
sentative sample has been collected. Procedure for collection of gas samples
is as follows:
1. Connect tubing from gas probe to gas sample tube inlet.
2. Connect the suction end of the field gas analyzer to gas sample tube
outlet.
3. Open stopcocks on both ends of gas sampling tube.
U. Switch on field gas analyzer and draw sample through gas sample tube
into gas analyzer until parts per million reading remains fairly con-
stant, but for not less than one minute. (Pumping rate is approximately
1400 ml/min.)
5. Close sample tube outlet stopcock.
6. Close sample tube inlet stopcock.
7- Disconnect the gas sample tube outlet from the field gas analyzer.
8. Connect the hand vacuum pump to the gas sample tube outlet.
9. Open the stopcock at the outlet of the gas sample tube.
10. Pump with the hand vacuum pump for 20 repetitions (equal to approxi-
mately 26" of Mercury pressure) to evacuate the sample tube.
142
-------
11. Close the stopcock at the outlet of the gas sample tube.
L 12. Reconnect and switch on the field gas analyzer.
13. Open the inlet stopcock, then the outlet stopcock of the gas sample
!j * tube.
14. Continue pumping for 30 seconds.
*"•* « 15. Close sample tube outlet stopcock.
, 16. Close sample tube Inlet stopcock.
vJ
17- Disconnect gas sample tube from gas probe and field gas analyzer;
Care should be taken not to disturb either stopcock while trans-
-~
porting and handling the gas sample tube. Record on the gas sample
• tube the container number, sampling location, and date.
Connect to
Gas Probe -^
Gas Sample
Tube -7
O -^ ~^- -JE
'"' 4"V y~~^
L- Inlet
Stopcock
-Outlet
Stopcock
Gas
Analyzer
Heavy Metals
All field samples require preanalytleal treatment consisting of the
addition of 5 ml 1:1 UNO* per liter of sample. The acid is placed In the
collecting container prior to collection and the sample bottle Is filled to
the top and capped.
Analysis for five heavy metals (Hg, Pb, Zn, Cu, Cd) is done by
Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry. Pb, Zn, Cu, and Cd are run by the normal
flame method as described In Standard Methods (page
Mercury Is analyzed for by the flameless atomic absorption technique
similar to that prescribed by EPA Methods (page 121). Additional information
on this technique is available (6, 7). Details of the analytical procedure
are presented below:
* Hereinafter reference to EPA Methods indicates Reference 2.
143
-------
Total Mercury Analysis
The following method for the determination of Mercury in solution
employs a preanalytlcal acid oxidation procedure followed by a simple
reduction aeration procedure to produce and introduce elemental mercury
•'•'•-:'•--• : ' .' •
ftfftif Inte • fletfthrough »y»tem where the absorption at 253.7 nm is measured
in a quartr-windowed cell. This method applies to both groundwater and
"':-..•••...;. - • • ', .
leachate samples, although the sample volume may have to be increased for the
• • .-'•.- ' ' ' ..
groundwater samples.
The range of the method may be varied through instrument and/or
recorder expansion. Using a 25 ml sample, a detection limit of l.Ojug Hg/1
can be maintained. Concentrations below this level should be reported as
<1.0.
. • • • - . .
1. Acid Oxidation Procedure
a. Place a sample aliquot of 25 ml in a 100 ml Erlenmeyer Flask.
If necessary, a diluting solution is added to bring samples up
to a convenient volume.
b. Add 5 ml acid splution, 2 ml potassium persulfate solution and
several drops of potassium permanganate solution. Cover or
stopper the flasks and allow solutions to stand at least 2k
hours at room temperature. .
. • . . . .
e. Add several drops of potassium permanganate solution. DIge.s-
tlon Is considered complete whin th« pink KMnO^ color remains
at least one hour. The sample is now ready for analysis.
2. Ana 1 y t i ca 1 P roced u re
a. Transfer the sample to the volItllization cell (see figure).
Seal the volitilization cell.
b. Add 10 ml of reducing solution by syringe. Several blanks
. ' • ••••'.. '
are prepared by treating 25 ml altquots of dilution water
exactly like the samples.
144
-------
3. Calibration
Each and every time samples are run, at least three standard
mercury solutions (0.5, 1.0, 1.5>jg Hg) must be run to calibrate
the system.
a. Add desired amount of standard mercury solution to the volatili-
zation eel 1.
b. Add sufficient dilution water to give about 25 ml total volume.
c. Add 5 ml acid solution.
d. Seal the volatilization cell.
e. Add 5 ml of the reducing solution by syringe.
A. Calculation
a. Determine the peak height of the unknown from the strip chart and
read the mercury value from the standard curve. The standard
curve is prepared by plotting the peak height of standards versus
the micrograms of Hg.
b. Calculate the mercury concentration in the sample by the following
relationship:
jug Hg/1 = jug Hg In Aliquot x . .100° =
x~s a /-a a T aliquot volume
5. Reagents
a. Acid Solution. 2:1 by volume ratio of concentrated sulfuric
acid, H2S0lt, and nitric acid, HNO_.
b. Diluting Solution. Add 1 ml concentrated perchloric acid to one
liter distilled water, and add a few KMnO. crystals to just give
a faint pink color.
c. Potassium Permanganate Solution. 5% solution, w/v. Dissolve-pt
5 gm KMnO, in 100 ml distilled water.
d. Potassium Persulfate Solution. 5% solution, w/v. Dissolve
5 gm «2S Og in 100 ml distilled water.
e. Reducing Solution. To 2 liters of distilled water add 250 gm
SnCl., 150 gm NH OH-HC1, 150 gm NaCl, and 100 ml of concentrated
H2SV
145
-------
f. Stock Mercury Solution. Dissolve 0.135^ gm of mercuric chloride
in 75 ml of distilled water. Add 10 ml of concentrated nitric
acid and adjust the volume to 100 ml. 1 ml - 1 mg Hg
g. Standard Mercury Solution. Make the appropriate dilutions of the
stock mercury solution to obtain a working standard containing
0.1 jug per ml. This working standard and the dilutions must be
prepared fresh daily. The acidity of the working standard
should be kept at about 0.15% nitric acid. This acid should be
added to the flask as needed before the addition of the aliquot.
6. Apparatus
a. Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. Any atomic absorption unit
which is capable of accommodating the cold vapor ceil. Instru-
ment settings recommended by the manufacturer should be followed.
b. Hg Hollow Cathode Lamp.
c. Recorder. Any multi-range variable speed strip chart recorder
compatible with the Uv detection system in use.
d. Cold Vapor Absorption Cell. Suitable cells may be constructed
from standard spectrophotometric 10 cm cells having quartz end
windows or may be constructed from plexiglass tubing making sure
to use quartz end windows that are perpendicular to the line of
light. See Reference 1, 6, or 7 for exact details.
Nitrogen
Ammonia. The preliminary distillation method is used for ammonia
as described in Standard Methods (page 229). The distillation method covers
the determination of ammonia-nitrogen exclusive of total Kjeldahl nitrogen.
This method covers the range from about 1.0 to 25 mg/1 when the titrometric
end point is used. Since most leachate samples will contain NH -N in the
range 100-600 mg/1, it will be necessary to use small sample volumes (20-AOO ml)
and dilute with ammonia-free distilled water up to 500 ml.
-------
H
V Organic Nitrogen. Organic Kjeldahl nitrogen is defined as the
k .
. | nitrogen converted to ammonia from nitrogen components of biological origin
u . . ;
such as amino acids, proteins and peptides, but may not include the nltro-
f , genous compounds such as amines, nltro compounds, hydrazones, oxlmes, semt-
carbazones and refractory tertiary amines. Organic Kjeldahl nitrogen Is
1 \ | •.•''•
U ^ determined after distillation of free ammonia from the sample. The method
used Is described in the EPA Methods (page 149) and is similar except for minor
details to the procedure detailed in Standard Methods (page 244).
'*; . Nitrate Nitrogen. The Brucine Method employed for the measurement
of nitrate nitrogen is described in EPA Methods (page 170). This method is
^ based upon the reaction of the nitrate ion with brucine sulfate in a
j 13N H«SO. solution at a temperature of 100° C. The color of the resulting
u
complex is measured at 410 nm. Temperature control of the color reaction is
fj extremely critical. Details of the analytical procedure are presented below:
Brucine Method
^ This method is applicable to the analysis In both groundwater and
. • leachate samples. Modification can be made to remove or correct for
LJ .. .
turbidity, color, salinity, or dissolved organic compounds in samples. The
* ' range of the method Is 0.1 to 2 mg/1 NO.-N.
«— . . • 3 '
' ' Samples may be preserved for several days by the addition of 40 mg/1
^ HgCl2 and storage at 4°C. Analysis should not be delayed more than a week.
t I. Points to Note.
a. Dissolved organic matter will cause an off color In
and must be compensated for by additions of all reagents except
the bruclne-sulfanllIc acid reagent. This also applies to
natural color present not due to dissolved organlcs.
b. The effect of salinity is eliminated by addition of sodium
chloride to the blanks, standards, and samples.
Brucine Sulfate Is toxic; reagent bottle should be marked with warning;
-------
c. Ferrous and ferric Iron and quadrivalent manganese give slight
positive interference. In concentrations less than 1 mg/1
these are negligible.
d. All strong oxidizing or reducing agents interfere. The presence
of oxidizing agents may be determined by the addition of ortho-
tolidine reagent.
e. Uneven heating of the samples and standards during the reaction
time will result In erratic values. The necessity for absolute
control of temperature during the critical color development
period cannot be too strongly emphasized.
2. Analytical Procedure
a. Adjust the pH of the samples to approximately pH 7 with 1:3
acedic acid and, if necessary, filter through a 0.5^/j pore
size filter.
b. Set up the required number of matches tubes in the rack to
handle reagent blank, standards and samples. It Is suggested that
tubes be spaced evenly throughout the rack to allow for even flow
of bath water between the tubes. Even spacing of tubes should
assist in achieving uniform heating of all tubes.
c. If It Is necessary to correct for color or dissolved organic
matter which will cause color on heating, a set of duplIcate
tubes must be used to which all reagents except the brucine-
sulfanilic acid has been added.
d. Pipette 10.0 ml or an aliquot of the samples diluted to 10.0 ml
into the sample tubes.
e. If the samples have high dissolved solids, add 2 ml of the 30
percent sodium chloride solution to the reagent blank, standards,
and samples. For groundwater samples, sodium chloride solution
may be omitted. Mix contents of tubes by swirling and place rack
In cold water bath (0-10°C).
f. Pipette 10.0 ml of sulfuric acid solution into each tube and mix
by swirling. Allow tubes to come to thermal equilibrium In the
cold bath. Be sure that temperatures have equilibrated in all
tubes before continuing.
, (8
-------
g. Add 0.5 ml brucine-sulfani1ic acid reagent to each tube (ex-
cept the interference control tubes) and carefully mix by
swirling, then place the rack of tubes in the boiling water bath
for exactly 25 minutes.
CAUTION: Immersion of the tube rack into the bath should not
decrease the temperature of the bath more than 1 to 2 C. Flow
of bath water between the tubes should not be restricted by
crowding too many tubes into the rack, in order to keep this
temperature decrease to an absolute minimum. If color develop-
ment in the standards reveals discrepancies in the procedure,
the operator should repeat the procedure after reviewing the
temperature control steps.
h. Remove rack of tubes from the hot water bath and immerse in
the cold water bath and allow to reach thermal equilibrium
(20-25° C.).
i. Dry tubes and read absorbance against the reagent blank at 410 nm.
3. Calculation
a. Obtain a standard curve by plotting the absorbance of standards
run by the above procedure against mg NO,-N. (The color reaction
does not always follow Beer's law).
b. Subtract the absorbance of the sample without the brucine-
sulfanilic reagent from the absorbance of the sample containing
brucine-sulfani1ic acid and read the absorbance in mg NO,-N.
Convert mg per aliquot of sample to mg per leter.
A. Reagents
a. Distilled water free of nitrite and nitrate is to be used in
preparation of all reagents and standards.
b. Sodium chloride solution (300 g/1). Dissolve 300 g NcCl in
distilled water and dilute to 1.0 1.
c. Sulfuric acid solution. Carefully add 500 ml H SO. (sp. gr. 1.
to 125 ml distilled water. Cool and keep tightly stoppered to
prevent absorption of atmospheric moisture.
149
-------
d. Brucine-sulfan!1Ic acid reagent. Dissolve 1 g brucine sulfate
UC23H26N2V2'H2SV7H2°] and 0>1 9 5u1fanilic acid
(Nh^CgH^SO.H-^O) In 70 ml hot distilled water. Add 3 ml
concentrated HC1, cool, mix and dilute to 100 ml. Store in a
dark bottle at 5°C. This solution is stable for several months;
the pink color that develope slowly does not effect its usefulness.
Mark bottle with warning: CAUTION: Brucine Sulfate is toxic;
take care to avoid Ingest ion.
e. Potassium nitrate stock solution (1 ml =0.1 mg NO.-N). Dis-
solve 0.7218 g anhydrous potassium nitrate (KNO,) in distilled
water and dilute to 1 liter.
f. Potassium nitrate standard solution (1 ml = 0.001 mg NO -N).
Dilute 10.0 ml of the stock solution to I liter. This standard
solution should be prepared fresh weekly.
g. Acetic acid (1+3). Dilute 1 vol. glacial acetic acid (CH.COOH)
with 3 volumes of distilled water.
5. Apparatus
a. Spectrophotometer or filter photometer suitable for measuring
absorbance at 410 nm and capable of accommodating 25 mm diameter
cells.
b. Sufficient number of 25 mm diameter matches tubes for reagent
blanks, standards, and samples.
c. Neoprene coated wire racks to hold 25 mm diameter tubes.
d. Water bath suitable for use at 100 C. This bath should contain
a stirring machanism so that all tubes are at same temperature
and should be of sufficient capacity to accept the required
number of tubes without significant drop in temperature when
the tubes are immersed.
e. Water bath suitable for use at 10-15°C.
Measurement of pH
pH Is measured in the field using a battery operated Beckman
Electromate pH Meter. The instrument is equipped with a combination electrode
and normal operating procedures will assure a precision of ± 0.1 pH unit.
150
-------
The following is a detailed description of test procedures for use
by field personnel who will be making the In-sltu pH measurements. It is
Important that explicit care be taken to assure as great an accuracy and pre-
cision as can be maintained since field measurements are unduly subject to
possible error.
1. Calibration of pH meter and electrode.
a. Check the battery power supply to assure adequate power.
b. Check to make sure that the pH meter Is in the proper operating
mode. Turn function switch to STANDBY, temperature compensation
to the temperature of samples and buffers.
c. Be sure that the samples and buffers are at the same temperature
before calibrating Instrument.
d. Rinse off electrode with distilled water and dry gently with
soft tissue paper.
• . e. Place the combination electrode into the buffer .solution pH 7«
Turn function switch to pH and after several minutes adjust the
meter reading to the pH of the buffer solution by using the
"standardize" dial.
f. Turn function switch to STANDBY. Remove combination electrode
from buffer solution, rinse with distil led water, and dry.
g. Repeat e. and f. for buffer of pH k.
'*' Measurement of Sample pH.
a. Use of the combination electrode allows measurement of pH in
small beakers. Use a clean 50 ml or 100 ml beaker. Insert the
combination electrode in sample. The electrode must not touch
the sides or bottom of the beaker. Turn function switch to pH.
Slowly rotate the beaker several times to insure good contact of
sample and electrode When meter reading has stabilized, record pH.
b. Turn function switch to STANDBY and remove electrode. Rinse
electrode with distilled water and dry carefully with soft tissue.
c. Repeat procedure for each sample. •
151
-------
3. Storage and care of combination electrode.
a. The salt solution in the reference part of the electrode
should be topped off occasionally to assure an adequate level "
Is maintained.
b. The rubber sleeve should be kept over the fill hole except «**
when equilibrating pressure or filling with salt solution.
• . '::--- •":•'' :.'.-. . '•.. -:,sv, i
c. The electrode should be stored in a manner that keeps the •<. "
electrode tip wet at all times.
... ' . M
Phosphate - Total
Digestion of Raw Sample; The persulfate digestion method will be
used to prepare samples for analysis of total phosphate. The method follows
.'-"'" ' . '
the description in Standard Methods (page 526). Additional information on
.a
this digestion method can be found elsewhere0.
• < ' ' .
When necessary the sulfuric acid-nitric acid digestive method,
Standard Methods (page 525), will be used In lieu of the above.
Analytical Method; The ascorbic acfd-molybdate method described
In Standard Methods (page 532) is applicable to the measurement of total "
phosphate in the leachate samples. Arsenates Interfere with the analysis
i
above 0.05 mg/1 arsenic. This method for total phosphate is adequate for
the full range of 0.03 to 2.0 mg/1 as P.
When necessary the above specified analytical method will be replaced
by the vanadomolybdo-phosphorlc acid colorimetrlc method, Standard Methods
(page 527).
'
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)
Since the chlorinated compounds are generally quite surface active, *
most of the PCB is expected to be on the suspended material. The suspended
matter, after separation on a glass fiber disc, is extracted by agitation *
in 1:1 acetone:aceton itrite. Chlorinated pesticides are partitioned into
petroleum ether after the addition of a weak salt solution. The extract is
152
-------
cleaned up on florist 1 before gas-liquid chromatography detection of the
chlorinated materials.
This method is suitable for aqueous samples with or without large
amounts of suspended matter. The detection limit is 10 nanograms per liter
of sample. Therefore it is very important that extraordinary cleanliness be
maintained to avoid contamination.
Analytical Method
Samples containing 1 gm/1 or more suspended matter must be filtered
(Section 1) and the filtrate and suspended matter analyzed separately as
discussed in Section 3 (water) and Section 2 (sediment). Samples having less
than 1 gm/1 suspended material can be analyzed as a whole sample according to
Section 3.
'• Filtration of Heavily Sedimented Samples
a. Place a 7 cm. Whatman GF/B filter pad (or equivalent) in a
porcelain Buchner funnel and prewash with 50 ml distilled petro-
leum ether. Discard the washings.
b. Measure out 1 liter of homogeneous sample and filter using suction.
c. Transfer the filtrate to a 2 liter separatory funnel and proceed
according to Section 3-
d. Transfer the filter pad to a 600 ml beaker with clean forceps
and proceed according to Section 2.
2- Extraction Procedure for Sediment Fraction
a. Add 100 ml of 1:1 acetonitrile:acetone and 50 ml distilled
water to beaker containing the filter pads. Allow contact for
more than 2 hours with occasional stirring.
b. After 2 hours remove the sediment from the filter pad by mas-
cerating the pad with two clean glass stirring rods.
c. Allow the sediment to settle and decant the clear supernatant
using the stirring rods to hold back the glass filter fibers.
Decant into 1000 ml of distilled water in a 2 liter separatory funnel
153
-------
d. Repeat the partitioning with two additional 50 ml portions of
1:1 acetonItrile:acetone, each time allowing the sample to soak
for more than one hour with occasional swirling. Decant the
clear supernatant into the separatory funnel. This should
bring the total volume up to 200 ml of extractant.
e. Add 30 gm Na^SO. and extract two times with 150 ml petroleum
ether, each time washing the petroleum ether twice with 100 ml
distilled water which is added to the rest of the aqueous sample.
(This is done to wash acetonitrile and acetone out of the petroleum
ether so they will not interfere with the florisil cleanup.) If
heavy emulsion occurs at this point, as it may with dirty samples,
include the emulsion with the aqueous phase each time and par-
tition a third time with 150 ml petroleum ether.
f. Carry through with evaporation, florisil cleanup and detection
as described fn Section 3 for aqueous samples.
3. Extraction Procedure for Aqueous Fraction
a. Add 150 ml of redistilled 15$ diethyl ether in petroleum ether
to the sample. Shake vigorously for 3 minutes. Settle for at
least 10 minutes.
b. Draw off and save the aqueous phase.
c. Swirl the organic phase to dislodge water from the sides of the
funnel.
d. Draw the organic phase into a clean 600 ml beaker.
e. Return the aqueous phase to the separatory funnel and repeat
steps a-d with another 150 ml \5% ethyl ether in petroleum ether,
f. Repeat steps a-d with 150 ml petroleum ether (no ethyl ether).
g. Prepare a large funnel with a small cotton plug and 2 teaspoons
of Na.SO.. Wash this with 50 ml petroleum ether.
h. Pour the sample through Na2$0. to dry it and catch the sample in
a clean 600 ml beaker.
i. Follow the sample with another 25 ml petroleum ether to wash the
Na.SO. and catch this washing in the beaker containing the sample.
154
-------
j. Place the sample beaker in a b5°C water bath and evaporate to :
about 25 ml volume (about 2 hours). This evaporation can also j
be accomplished in a K-D evaporator. j
k. Prepare a 4-inch florisil column and prewash with 50 ml petroleum !
ether. Discard the washing.
I. Follow the prewash with the sample. Add 150 ml of 11 (V/V)
ethyl ether in petroleum ether and then 150 ml of 20* (V/V)
ethyl ether in petroleum ether.
m. Add 100 mtcroliters of distilled xylene to each elutriated volume.
n. Evaporate the collected volume to about 1 ml volume in a K-D
evaporator.
o. Cool the evaporator under a cold water stream and wash down the
large flask with the condensed solvent.
i
p. Reduce the sample down to an injectable quantity as rapidly as
possible in a 45°C water bath. Thoroughly mix the contents before |
GLC detection. 1
f;
q. Initial detection is done by GLC using 3* OV-I and the Nicher-63 f
electron capture detector. Confirmation of positive amounts of
chlorinated hydrocarbons is first done on 3$ OV-17 using a Coulson
electrolytic conductivity halide specific detector and then on
5% OV-17 plus 2% QF-1 using a Dohrmann mlcro-coulometric chloride
specific detector.
Sodium and Potassium
The preferred method of analysis for sodium and potassium utllIzes
the flame photometer technique. Standard analytical procedures are followed
as described in Standard Methods (page 317 and 283).
Satisfactory results can also be achieved by Atomic AbsorbtIon
Spectrophotometry.
Sulphate
Sulphate is determined by a gravimetric method utilizing precipitation
with barium as the barium sulphate solid. The filtered precipitate Is ignited
155
-------
at 800 C for I hour prior to cooling and weighing. This method Is used for
both leachate and groundwater samples. Care must be taken with leachate
samples to avoid error caused by precipitation of barium chloride during the
sulfate analysis. The gravimetric method is described in detail in Standard
Methods (page 330-
Settleable Solids
Settleable matter is determined according to the procedure given In
Standard Methods (page 539) using the Imhoff cone. '
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total dissolved solids is determined according to the procedure
described in Standard Methods (page 290). There may be a significant dissolved
organic fraction present in the leachate samples so that correspondence
between specific conductance and TDS may be different from thet of the ground-
water samples.
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
The analytical procedure employed for determining suspended solids
was originally described by Wycoff CO. Suspended sol ids are determined by
leachate filtration through a glass fiber filter pad. The initial weight of
each-pad is determined before filtration. Following filtration, the pads are
dried for one hour at 103°C and then weighed. The glass pads are weighed
again after being ignited for 10 minutes at 600°C if the volatile fraction Is
to be determined. The method utilized is described in Standard Methods (page 537).
Volatile Acids
Volatile acids (total organic acids) is measured by the column-
partition chromatographic method as given in Standard Methods (page 577).
Special precaution should be exercised in maintaining the normality of the stan-
dard sodium hydroxide titrant by excluding CO* from the reagent bottle.
15
-------
APPENDIX H
MONITORED DATA
157
-------
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE
PLATE WO.
Thermister Readings
Gas Probe Readings
Laboratory Gas Analysis -Cell A £ B
Laboratory Gas Analysis -Cell C S D
Laboratory Gas Analysis -Cell E
Leachate Analysis -Cell A
Leachate Analysis -Cell B
Leachate Analysis -Cell C
Leachate Analysis -Cell D
Leachate Analysis -Cell E
Water Analysis - Water Added to
CelIs B & C
Groundwater Analysis -Well 1
Groundwater Analysis -Well 2
Groundwater Analysis -Well 3
Groundwater Analysis -Well 4
Groundwater Analysis - Original
Geotechnical Investigation
Cel1 A 6 E Subdrain
Observation Wells and Piezometers
Cumulative Leachate Production
Cumulative Leachate Production
Lysimeter Samples - Field Analysis
So 1ut i on Ana lysis
Record of Rainfall, Evaporation and
Runoff
Settlement Data
Liquid Rout ing - Cell C
Liquid Rout ing - Cell D
H-1A, IB, 1C
H-2A, 2B
H-3A, 3B
H-JfA, 4B
H-5A, 5B
H-6A, 6B, 6C
H-7A, 7B, 7C
H-8A -8H
H-9A -9H
H-10A -IOC
H-l 1A, 1 IB, 11C, 1 ID
H-12A -12E
H-13A, 13B, 13C, 13D
H-UA, UB, 1*»C, 140
H-15A, 15B, 15C
H-16A
H-17A, 17B, 17C
H-18A
H-19A, 19B
H-20A ( Discontinued)
H-21A
H-22A
H-23A - 23T
H-24A - 24D
H-25A - 25H
H-26A - 26H
Preceding page blank
159
-------
THERMISTER READINGS
DATE TIME AIR
TEMP.
1971
11-8 PH 25.8
11-10 AM 24.5
PM 22.3
11-11 AM
11-12 AM
11-11 AM 9.1
PM
11-15 AM 9.8
11-16 AM 13.2
PM 21.it
11-17 AM 7.0
PM 20.3
11-18 AM 13.5
PM 20 . 1
11-19 AM 9.7
PM 17.5
11-22 AM 7.2
PM 17.5
11-23 AM 10.0
PM 12.0
11-214 AM 10.5
PM 10.0
11-29 AM
11-30 AM 6.1*
PM 21.0
12-1 AM 10.1
12-2 AM 7.5
PM 7.5
[ 12-3 AM 6.7
12-6 AM 15.0
PM 18.1
12-7 AM 12.5
12-8 PM 15.1*
12-9 AM 12.1
12-10 AM 15.0
CELL A
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Top
17.1
26.6 19.1
26.8 26.6
27.8 27.5
29.6 27.8
25.1 29.5 18.5
21*. 8 29.2 19.1
24.2 28.4 27.6
22.i* 28.1* 42.5
22.6 28.2 1*3.9
22.5 27.9 35.7
22.3 27.9 33.4
22.3 27.5 28.6
22.3 27.5 27.7
22.2 27.7 26.1
22.2 27.6 25.8
21.9 27.1 ,2i*.0
21.9 27.1 24.0
21.8 27.0 21*. 0
21.8 27.0 23.9
21.8 27.0 23.9
21.8 26.9 23.5
21.7 26.4 23.2
21.6 26.3 21.9
21.6 26.3 21.9
21.7 26.5 21.7
21.6 26.2 21.4
21.5 26.1 21.2
21.6 26.0 21.3
21.4 26.1 19.9
21.4 25.8 19.7
21.U 25.8 19.1
21.4 25.6 18.8
21.6 25.6 18.3
21.1* 25.5 17.8
CELL B
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Top
18.1
-
22.6 13.8
22.8 19. 4
22.1* 25.5
22.6 25.6
23.2 26.6
23.2 27.4
23.1* 28.9
23.4 29.1
23.9 34.4
24.1 35.1
24.2 35.2
24.4 35.5
24.7 35.7 20.6
24.6 35.7 22.2
24.5 35.6 21.0
25.7 34.8 19.7
25.7 34.7 20.9
25.9. 34.4 21.7
29.3 33.1 21.7
29.7 32. 9"" 22. 7
30.5 32.7 22.6
CELL C
Temperature ''c
Bot. Mid. Top
CELL D
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Top
CELL E ~~|
Temperature °C 1
Bot. Mid. Top
]
18.2
22.5
24.5
30.7
22.7
24.5
25.2
30.7 19.6
31.0 19.9
31.4
31.3 20.1
31.5 20.3
31.3 20.6
29.3 26.2
29.0 26,1
28.9 27.1
28.9 27.8
28.6 28.8
28.5 28.9
28.5 28.7 !
27.9 32.0 i
27.9 32.0
27.9 32.5
27.8 32.8
27.8 33.0
27.8 33.1
TIIERMISTER READINGS
PLATE rf- 11
DATE TIME AIR
TEMP.
1971
12-13 AM 11.5
12-14 AM 11.7
12-15 AM 11.3
12-16 PM 14.1*
12-17 PM 14.3
12-20 PM 9.9
12-21 AM 6.6
12-28 PM
12-29 PM
12-30 AM
1972
1-11 AM
1-18 PM
1-27 AM
2-15 AM
3- Ht AM
3-28 AM
it- 1 1 AM
4-25 AM
5-9 AM
5-23 AM
6-6 AM
6-20 AM
7-11 AM
7-25 AM .
8-8 AM
8-23 AM
9-7 AM
9-20 AM
10-11 AM ,6-0
10-21* AM
i :l-8 AM' 21.0
l!-21 AM i;.C
CELL A
Temperature °C
Bot. M)d. Top
21.3 24.9 16.6
24.3 25.6 22.6
21.7 25.1 16.1
21.6 25.0 15-7
-
21.4 24.5 14.6
-
21-3 21.3 13.9
21.2 23.7 13.7
-
20.7 22.5 12.8
20.5 22.0 II. 1
20.8 21.7 13.8
19.7 20.6 17.4
19.0 19.5 15.4
18.6 18.5 15.4
18.4 18.3 16.1
18.2 18.! 16.9
18.2 18.1 18.2
18.1 18.2 20.0
18.1 18.5 21.5
18.1 18.5 23.4
18.2 19.) 24.6
18.5 '9-1* 25.6
18.7 19. S 25.9
18.9 20.4 26,0
19.0 20.4 26.6
20.7 -
19.5 21.3 24.9
The
19.5 20.6 16.7
19.4 20.4 14.3
CELL B
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Top
30.4 32.1 21.4
31.8 39.9 25.6
30.2 31-9 21.3
30.1 31.9 21.3
29.8 31.6 21.2
28.9 30.9 20.9
-
26.9 29.2 20.0
26.7 28.8 19.8
_
27.2 27.1 18.6
24.2 25-3 17-3
24.0 24.1 17.2
22.7 22.2 15.9
20.7 20.2 16.9
20.2 19.7 17.5
19.8 19.8 17.5
19.6 19.2 17.6
19.3 19.0 18.8
19.2 19.0 20.0
19.2 19.2 21.1
19.2 19.5 22.6
19.5 20.1 24.1
19.7 20.6 25.1
19.8 20.9 25.0
20.2 21.3 25.0
20.5 21.6 25.5
21.9 -
20.8 21.9 23.3
mister Connections
20.5 21.1 16.5
20.6 20.8 f -
CELL C
Temperature C
Bot. Mid. Top
31.6 22.6 -
32.5 25.4 20.2
30.1 23.7 24.2
29.7 24.7 21.1
29.3 25.4 20.0
28.3 26.2 17.3
-
26.6 26.1 14.6
26.4 26.0 14.5
26.3 25.8 14.4
24.5 25.0 11.5
23.8 20.3 10.7
22.9 16.8 10.7
20.6 13.5 10.6
18.5 14.0 14.3
18.2 15.6 14.7
18.1 15-7 15.1
17.0 15.7 15.4
17.2 16.9 16.7
17.9 18.4 18.5
18.7 19.9 19.6
19.4 20.4 21.7
20.2 22.3 22.4
21.1 23.6 22.6
21.7 23.3 23.0
21.9 23.6 23.2
22.4 24.1 25.5
24.0
22.4 21.7 20.7
shorted-out by ra
Shorted Oat
01 2 - 17.0
CELL D
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Top
11.3
16.1
17.7
19.5 21.2 23.2
19.5 22.1 24.3
19.5 22.5 22 4
19.9 16.4 15.2
15.9 15.1 13.7
15.7 14.0 14.5
12.4 11.5 10.8
17.0 13.9 14.3
16.5 15,9 16.0
17.0 16.3 17.6
16.6 16.6 17.0
17-4 18.1 ig.l
18.8 20.0 21.8
20.9 21.8 24.7
22.9 23.5 27.6
25.0 26.5 28.0
26.9 27.9 29.2
27.5 27.6 30.3
24.9 26.6 29.3
26.8 27.6 27.9
28.1
26.9 26.0 23.6
nwater .
25.2 21.5 16.8
22.5 13.2 14.6
CELL E
Temperature °C
Bot. Mid. Too
28.0 32.8 19.2
24.0 27.5 17.4
27.9 33.4 18.8
28.0 33.4 18.4
-
28.0 33.0 16.7
-
28.0 31.8 14.5
27.8 31.5 14.1
-
26.9 29.2 10.9
26.1 27.4 10.5
27.9 32.4 p.7
23.2 23.7 12.2
21.0 20.9 16.2
20.6 19,9 17.6
19.8 19.2 16, 7
19.3 18.8 !7.J
19.1 18.9 18.9
18.8 18.7 71 "
18.9 18.2 23.
18.9 19.5 <5,«
19.2 20.J 26.4
19.5 20.9 26.:'
19.7 21.4 27. i
19.8 21.6 27.0
20.2 22.1 27.5
22.4
20.5 22.5 23.0
20.6 21.1 20.6
20.5 20 o U.;< '
-------
THERMISTER READINGS
DATE TIME AIR
TEMP.
11-30 AH 6.0
12-15 AH 14.0
HO-73 AM 11.0
I-2J-73 AM 5.0
2-6-73 A« 11-5
2-27-73 AM 13-0
3-13-73 AM 11.5
3-27^73 AM 15.5
A- 10-73 AH 21.0 -
4-24-73 AM 22.0
5-15-73 AH 22.0
6-5-73 AM 20.0
6-26-73 AH 27.0
CELL A
Temperature C
Bot. Hid. Top
19.2 20.0 13.1
18.9 19.1 7.8
18.2 17.6 8.0
21.2 16.8 10.5
15.4*16.4 9.8
17.1 16.1 11.9
17.1 16.0 11.9
16.8 15.7 12.0
16.7 15-8 14.6
16.7 15.8 16.6
16.9 16.6 20.3
17.6 18.9 21). 8
17.6 18.3 26.8
CELL B
Temperature C
Bot. Hid. Top
20.3 20.3 16-.1
19.7 19.3 12.3
18.7 17.7 -
18.2 17.0 11.9
17.7 16.4 11.5
17.3 15.8 12.lt
15.9 15.7 12.7
16.7 15.5 12.6
16.6 15. 4 13.7
16.6 15.6 15.3
16.7 16.1 18.5
21.6 17.0 21.8
17.7 18.2 2ii.lt
CELL C
Temperature C '
Bot. Mid. TOD
20.4 13.0 11.6
22.7* 14. 4
17.7 9.5 7.2
16.3 9.0 8.6
16.8 16.7 12.6
10.3* l0-8* 10-3*
15-5 11.2 10.6
14.7 11.4 10.6
14.1 11.9 12.8
14.1 13.5 14.9
15.1 15.9 18.0
16.1 16.3 21.9
17.7 21.1 21.8
CELL »
Temperature C
Bot., Hid. TOD
21.1 17.8 13.7
19.3 15.2 8.7
13.1 13.0 9.1
15.8 12.5 II.)
14.7 12.3 10.6
14.2 12.7 12.2
14.1 15.1 12.3
12.1 13.2 12.0
14.) 13.3 13.5
14.4 14.2 15.0
15.1 16.4 18.1
16.4 18.9 24.2
18.1 21.8 23.8
CEIL E
Temperature C '
Bet. Hid. TOD
20.1 19.8 11.3
19.3 18.4 S.9
18.1 16.6 6.4
JZ.l 15. 5 S.2
16.9 15.2 9.4
16,6 15.0 11.9
16.5 15.1 11.6
16.4 15.1 12.1
16.5 15.2 15.7
16.4 15.5 17.4
16.7 16.3 21.9
17.2 17.6 26.2
17.9 19.1 28,3
Ojieit I enable Data
PLATE H-1C
-//A
-------
CELL A
BH>ao*lMlity.-%
Boti Ij. Tttc
Sues collected in the
co*busttt)i<) tonic v
per m*iH'«to
• per million of
; readout- Units
* .
Mate
L
(1) Ease* ,coH«tt»!t In the 9»« #rob«* were teited for 4onc«ntc*tton Impart* p»r nil I ten of «*s*«»%J)»l« toxi« vapofs
prevent. Osp4«atretlons «>(ce«d»i lJi»tm«Wt re»do« 1 lnf» of lOTft K«rts per mlVTlon end «re therefore pot '
i jJ^it. t.h^L.i. r* -''
Ireludcd )jj*thl* table.
2rc»n re-idty.gj with dilution vity«u. tf*r«4*w) cx'los'bM
162
i
to«-IOi.
> t y
PLAT6 H-2B
-------
LABORATORY GAS ANALYSIS
CELLS A 6 B
PROBE
NO.
A-B
A-M
A-T
B-B
B-M
B-T
GAS
COMPONENTS
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Oloxld*
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nl trogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
DATE
12-8-71
30.0
12.4
57.6
0
46.4
8.6
45.0
0.
1-3-72
45.4
13.7
40.9
0
58.0
8.5
33.5
0
38.3
8.0
53.7
0.
71.0
7-0
22.0
0
1-18-72
54.6
10.8
34.6
0
1-27-7
65.3
4.6
30.1
0
2-15-72
81.3
4.2
14.5
0.0
68.8
7.1
24.1
0.0
59.4
6.6
34.0
0.0
3-2-72
75.8
1.4
22.7
O.I
3-14-72
76.5
2.1
21.3
0.1
92.9
1.5
5.6
0.0
4-25-72
75.2
0.4
24.4
Tr
94.1
0.6
5.3
Tr
5-23-72
95.0
0.4
4.6
Tr
89.8
1 .0
9.2
Tr
73.8
0.3
25.9
Tr
-20-72
69.7
0.4 '
29.9
Tr
70.5
0.5
29.0
Tr
M.5
1.9
56.6
Tr
7-25-72
68.7
0.5
30.8
Tr
82.9
1,2
15.9
Tr
* - Flrtt latter Indicates call; second letter Indicates bottom, middle or top probe.
PLATE H-3A
LABORATORY GAS ANALYSIS
CELLS A 6 B
PROBE
NO.
A-B
A-M
A-T
B-B
B-M
B-T
GAS
COMPONENTS
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
N 1 trogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Ni trogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
N 1 1 rogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
N 1 1 rogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
DATE
8-23-72
66.0
1.2
32.8
Tr
81.8
0.9
17.3
Tr
9-20-72
65.3
0.8
33.9
Tr
81.7
0.4
17.8
O.I
10-24-7
66.4
0.6
33.0
Tr
74.3
0.9
24.7
O.I
1 1-2 1-72
69.7
0.4
29.9
Tr
79.1
0.6
20.1
0.2
12-19-72
71.6
0.4
27.9
O.I
78.7
0.7
20.3
0.3
1-23-73
70.9
0.5
28.4
0.2
2-27-73
73-4
1.0
25.2
0.4
78.6
0.6
20.3
0.5
3-27-73
73-7
0.4
25-5
0.4
73.6
0.7
25-1
0.6
6-5-73
77.4
0.3
21.8
0.5
76.9
0.8
21.1
1.2
_
* - First latter Indicates cell; second letter Indicates bottom, middle or top probe.
PLATE H-3B
-------
LABORATORY GAS ANALYSIS
CELLS C & D
PROBE
NO.
C-B
C-H
C-T
0-B
0-M
D-T
GAS
COMPONENTS
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
N i t rogen
Methane
DATE
-11-72
64.9
7.4
27.7
0
79.6
3-8
16.6
0
67.4
6.9
25.7
0
62.8
8.3
28.9
0
70.9
6.1
23.0
0
1-18-72
61.8
9.3
28.9
Tr
I-27-7J
68.7
7.0
24. 3
Tr
68.7
7.3
24.0
Tr
83.9
3.3
12.8
Tr
2-15-7
72.9
6.5
20.6
0.0
82.6
3.9
13-5
0.0
76.8
5.1
18.1
0.0
92.9
,'•*
"5.*
0.0-
3'2'72
75.7
5.6
18.7
Tr.
SOiO
3.8
16.2
Tr.
96.7
. 0.2
"•" 3-1
ff.o--
3-14-72
87". T
3.1
9-8
Tr
" —
3-28-7!
98. 5
0.1
• 1.4
0.0
-25-72
97.8
0.4
1.7
• a.r
98.1
0.1
1.8
Tr
5-23-72
99.8
Tr
O.I
O.I
6-20-72
98.8
0.2
0.9
O.I
98.9
Tr
I.I
Tr
7-25-72
99.4
Tr
0.1
0.5
94.4
0.1
2.2
3.4
* - First letter Indicates cell; second letter Indicates bottom, middle or top probe.
PLATE H-'iA
LABORATORY GAS ANALYSIS
CELLS C S D
PROBE
NO.
C-B
C-M
C-T
D-B
D-M
D-T
GAS
COMPONENTS
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Ni t rogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
N i t rogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Ni trogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
NI trogen
Methane
DATE
8-23-72
98.2
Tr
0.2
1.6
79-1
Tr
1.0
19.9
9-11-72
71.6
0.4
1.2
26.8
D-ll-72
96.4
Tr
0.1
3-5
10-24-7
96.0
Tr
0.2
3.8
80. 0
O.I
0.6
19.3
1 1-21-72
94.9
Tr
0.3
4.8
12-19-72
92.7
O.I
0.4
6.8
1-23-73
90.1
Tr.
0.2
9.7
-27-73
89.3
0.1
0.3
10.3
3-27-73
89.1
Tr
0.2
10.7
6-5-73
90.0
Tr
0.3
9.6
1-
* - First letter Indicates cell; second letter Indicates bottom, middle or top probe.
164
-------
LABORATORY, SAS ANALYSIS
i E o •'"
PROBE
NO.
E-B
E-M
E-T
GAS
COMPONENTS
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
N 1 1 rogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
N 1 1 rogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
0 DATE
2-8-71
65.5
2.5
0.2
•£
1-3-72
52.2
9.2
36.6
2.0
1.9.6
12.3
37 ".5"
0.6-
61.1.
7.5
30.8
-OJ
-
,«' •-
,'"'- "7 "
:i ~
1-18-72
65'. 7 -
7.7
2*7* "
2.2
68.3
7-3
23" i
62. 8 <•••
3.5
33.1
. 0.6.-;
O
O
'~',
^
'8 c
Lil
2-15-72
'V" "? ''
63.1
6.8
V ~
.?
rv
„„.„„„„
3-2-72
± 72.8"
5.4
2.9
' 57-7
3-2
38.3
* 0.7
:..: -v '•'
-.' 3
o o
•i -i
. .T :"
£i '
•-' O
_ -.
' Sg S
3-l*-72
"b.8
1.9
,; -,..
^
;•;, ;-•
" ••?
C)'" O
k °"
*•» W
w..,.,™,..™,..
*-25-7!
88.1
0.2
*• -.0 . C
•'.s
r?.
s . :,
& a f
6-20-73
86.2
0.7
10.2
2.9
77.6
2.3
18.1
2.0
52. *
0.8
1.6.2
_g.te'-
f.
;; '-
-25-72
79.6
1.3
16.8
2.3
.::, . .;.-.. •'
'*, •;.
"
8-23-72
';- |
81.6
0.2
15.7
2.5
- ,, '
|!
S .i
9-20-72
80. 1
0.5
17.1
2.3
r ;
-* :•
;
. ; i
J
J
t
• |
J
J
J
* - First Tetter Indicates cell; second letter Indicates bottom, middle or top probe.
PLATE H-SA
.J5AS».A!l»U_S.IS.,-.,. _.
o -•> CiLL E o a,
ft
PRCBE
NO.
E-B
E-M
:E-T
' : CAS
COMPONENTS
Ccrbon Dicxic'c
Oxygen
lCJ°l~"
Qfrbon Dioxide
Oxygen
K!trc-;tn
Msths.-a .
Oxygen
lift rogen
Katha-.e - '
Ccr;on Dioxide
Oxyccn
Hi t rogcn
Mcthsne
Cerbcn 'Dioxide
!!i trcgcn
Corbcn D.loxide
Oxygen
N'it re: en
Hc.he.-.i
10-21.-72
75-3
0.3
22.0
r..,2,lt...
' ° "" 6 o o DA?E v S - " •" •-" ;^ -• ° ,; ;: '
H-21-72
;- ^*
83.0
0.2
lit. 7
.4,1..
- •
"
'^'
^
-"•* •*"
12-19-72
" :" ;>
0
90.2
0.2
7.5
--- 2^1-
•
it
• I ";
<. --.. ..<
2-27-7
.....
.'" ~
V
O.I
3.3
t,r7_
,
3 ,,
— f
3-27-7
93-5
0.1
it.it
— *»«-
„ _
S r
X .^
,^J '-
•> -j- c
* o «.
!._:..:
1.-24-73
'V
o
•" .
93.0
0.1
"..5
4.4--
,,
.-- .-
? 1
'"I
'.*
liJl
brS-73
;... ;-, -
91.9
0.2
• 's.». '
•;-*-.-5-
!. ..: ;.
-"'
, •-:. -;
„..,...„.
------
; "
,.:.'....:1
..-< -V-
,
;
,,, . '
f
~ •
,- First IcUcr ir.dtcotcs cell;
sccorH letter iind:IMattes top, middle or .bottcri probr.
165
PLATE H-5B
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL A
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity (CaCOj)
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dl ssol ved Oxygen ppm
Fleet. Cond. u mhos/ cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen * Anroonli
Nitrogen - Organic
Nltrcfgen - Nitrate
.Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, nl/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
12-15-71
5.1
12-21-71
1.4
285
> • •
4.8
.'i-3-72
4.7
2-15-72
240
44
16200
5*
28
— 0.2
1.6
500
<0.5
. 2.6
0/0006
4.5
15.6
0'. 0
2,0
4.8
80
724
60
28
17.0
48
2. 1
5.0
9-7-72
1 300
2250
0
20
3260
56
30
-cO.08
4.6
1000
"3
«3
0.16
17
0.006!
0
3
0
0
6.6
128
724
70
«= O.I
20
28.5
430
0.23
5.0
* Units In tng/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Plate H-6A
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL A
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/ cm
Facal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
.Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic'
Nitrogen - Nitrate'
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
SoHds -T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
10-11-72
1370
2850
0
48
3&30
58
28
0.16
I.*
800
<3
<3
22.5
0.12
18
0.0035
3
14
0.10
<0.1
6.1
161
820
42
16.0
0.58
4.7
11-21-72
2160
16,200
•tO. OJ
93«
22.440
390
350
0.15
0.1
5250
<3
9.4.
750
0.44
590
0.013
81
8J
0.0
1.4
130
300
11,800
200
10.0
10,000
9.0
4.7
11-30-72
0.4
7000
0
250
7.0
4.8
1-10-73
3920
19,200
<0.1
1082
20,300
490
125
0.44
0.8
7250
<3
«3
1050
0.55
760
0.0100
48
42
0.90
2.8
148
338
14,080
98
10.0
12,700
5-5
4.8
2-27-73
2310
12,700
<0.05
440
17,600
424
75
0.06
0.4
5000
945
1.29
608
0.0120
66
29
0.40
1.4
120
288
10,700
14
.12.0
9400
3.2
5-4
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Plate H-6B
-------
LTACHATr. ANALYSIS
CELL A
cor.ro«i:NT •'
Alkal ini ty
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Cal c i utn
C.O.D.
Chlor ide
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond . u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli . KPN/ 100 ml
Fecal Strep. KPN/100 ml
Iron
Leud
Magnes 'mm
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod i um
Sol ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Sol ids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature' (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
3-13-73
0
108
3-27-73
SAMPLE DAT
ii-10-73
2835
17,500
< 0.05
858
18,300
MO
1)50
0.22
0.6
!<750
850
1.81
5"i8
0
55
17
1.6
115
272
11,020
16
20.0
9900
3-0
11.9
*• Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of soraple when tested for DO, EC am! pH.
hate H-6C
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL B
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity (CaCO )
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c i urn
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potass ium
Sodium
Sol ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
12-7-71
0
13,500
320
15,933
) ,l»75
1 ,600
1 .4
^4,000
^•2,400
320
66
0.029
15,970
421
4.4
12-10-71
0
15,300
200
17,920
998
2,000
<:0.5
9.3 xlO5
2.1 xlO7
550
58
0.084
0
25 ,028
496
4.2
12-15-71
4.5
12-21-71
1 . 1
14,500
4.3
12-28-71
972
32,400
1 ,681
42,600
1 ,800
2,500
0.8
12 ,000
300
1.5 xlO5
924
0.25
170
2.5
0
0
29,663
148
<0. 1
6, 360
4. 2
Units in mg/1 unless noted.
Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Piste !'- /A
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL B
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alka) inity
8.0. D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect, Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Col i. MPN/100 ml
Fgcal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P,.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod i urn
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volati le Acids
Zinc
p!)
1-3-72
2360
28,350
<0.25
2950
41,000
1725
3.6
2.4
<: 3.0
2.1 x lO1*
3.0
815
0.006
226
20
14
83
1500
1325
42,270
368
^.0.1
14.0
10,800
140
it. 2
1-7-72
7.4 ,
14,000
t
12.5
4.4
10-24-72
6880
45,000
0.19
1640
58,450
2000
950
0.29
0.5
20,000
6.0 '
2400
408
: 0-95
8)6
0.0035
780
5?0 .'
0.4
5.0
0
1560
1550
29,000
1800
980
19.0
17,500
62
5-0
11-30-72
61,700
0.2
10,000
<: 3.0
230
0
1070
6.0
5.3
1-23-73
5880
40,000
•^0.1
1323
51,400
498
650
0.20
0.3
9500
<3.0
360
425
0.35
344
0.0136
560
388
0
o.a
1180
1072
24,520
124
9.0
14,400
24
5.'*
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL B
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT * ,
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/100 m\
Iron
Cead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature** (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
3-13-73
4725 •
22,800
•*0.05
1130
32,200
1320
275
0.18
0.8
4500
«3.0
93.0
348
0.33
378
.0044
480
250
0.1
4.2
0
940
816
17,480
36
-
1036
13.0
10,100
10.8
5-2-
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when, tested for DO, EC and pH.
Plate H-7C
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
SAMPLE DATE ,
COMPONENT *
Temperature** (°C)
Alkalinity (CaCO?)
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. jj mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep.HPN/100 ml
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Armor i a
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Sulphate
12-15-71
4.3
12-21-71
1.4
11,200
*
4-7
12-28-71
* 0
»5.900
1041
27.300
750
1300
0.8
9500
230,000
4,300,000
•
1070
0.33
310
4.3
0.38
n ***
u
15,400
323
<0.1
5.1
1.-3-72
11.0
4900
22,500
< 0.25
1700 .
26,750
2.15
1225
1.0
4
15.000
< 2.0
725
0.0012
304
186
4.25
3.26
445
820
16,890
260
<0.1
11,520 .
28
5.1
1-7-72
11.0
0.5
1 1 ,400
5.4
* Units in mg/1 unless noted
**Temperature of sample when tested
***0etected .06 ppb Lindane.
for 00, EC and pH.
Plate H-8A
r- r
r
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
COMPONENT *
Temperature (°C)
Alkalinity (CaCOjJ
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. ji mhos/cm
Fecal Coll; MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep.MPN/100 ml
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate '
Nitrogen - Nitrite .
Phosphate -Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T^D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Sul pbate
SAMPLE DATE .
1-18-72
8.5
5480
2 It, 600
1200
33.500
700
1200
'•7
1 1 ,000
3
400
760
240
17«
3.24
0.030
9-8
15,190
128
<0.l
5.1
2-15-72
19.0
5240
26,400
1200
39,400
750
1120
0.5
11,000
500
550
432
3.8
34.0
19.336
182
5.1
880
3-2-72
16.5
41(50
27,000
<0.l
1600
32,620
700
0.6
iioo
1.0
10,000
<0.5
550
0,0014
800
400
3.10
41.7
0.35
845
950
18,444
88
io.too
42
5.1
3-14-72
21.0
4940
28,200
IIOO
30,500
500
1060
0.3
12,500
3
43,000
410
570
280
4.2
36
18,025
325
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity (CaCO )
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calc ium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cr?
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Feca! Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod i urn
Sol ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature ' (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
4- 1 1-72
4,050
20 ,400
«=:0. 1
1 ,200
27,948
880
1 ,700
<:0.25
0.9
9,000
cl .0
400
0.015
592
312
2.40
40.6
750
800
1 1 ,980
, 356
< 0. 1
448
. 19'5
9,700
30
5. 1
5-23-72
4, 100
23,700
880
24 ,600
740
400
0.4
9,750
6
43,000
220
656
240
3.6
41 .9
0
12,330
-v84
0.5
19.0
8,720
5. I
6-6-72
3 ,600
18,000
0. 1
1 ,050
20,276
570
350
0. 15
0.2
10,000
92
1 ,600,000
0.8
220
0.0102
632
800
1 .8
40. 3
560
550
10,080
58
0.6
340
20.0
7,730
22
4.9
"* -Units in »g/V unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Plate H-8C
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkal ini ty
B.0.0.
Cadm i urn
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. .Cond. jj mhos/cm
Fecal Co) i. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
6-20-72
2600
! 4,700
700
20,720
530
350
0.8
8000
200
i(16
50*
it. 60
36.3
9180
48
19.0
5-0
7-11-72
4400
17,960
<0.1
720
23,490
480
0.15
0.7
7500
140
•CO. 10
220
0.0065
351
90
0.04
24.0
480
476
9324
52
22.0
7270
13
5.1
7-25-72
3800
10,100
^0.1
600
16,630
4)0
0.18
0.0
72CO
120
0,10
192
303
69
0.05
16.4
380
468
7470
69
21.5
10
5-0
8-8-72
2800
13,600
<: 0.05
630
17,910
430
0.13
0.4
7300
<3
3
130
0.20
255
0.018
341
89
0.04
23-0
460
380
7642
206
20.5
5910
9.5
5.2
8-23-72
2600
10,540
610
17,170
420
150
0.4
7000
194
338
79
26.0
7268
178
22.0
5.0
* Units in mg/l unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Plate H-8B
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Sleet. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Col 1. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature " (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
_ _._)
9-7-72
3400
10,000
<0.05
570
18,320
323
275
0.07
0.2
6000
6
<3
115
0.22
158
0.060
306
68
0.5
17-0
0
340
312
6800
88
co.l
131
21.5
6060
7.5
5.0
9-20-72
3100
9200
570
15,130
540
225
1.2
6100
148
282
64
0.5
18.0
7160
78
22.5
4.9
SAMPLE DAT
10-11-72
1860
9900
<0.05
440
13,430
380
175
0.08
0.0
5600
3
9.3
150
0.15
154
0.0065
283
71
0.2
16.4
260
336
6630
120
18.0
5280
6.5
4.9
E
10-24-72
2160
10,350
0.05
600
16,780
370
240
0.06 .
0.4
7200
154
0.35
180
330
150
0.4
12.0
360
568
7950
50
22.0
6240
7.5
4.8
11-8-72
1370
13,000
0.06
560
15,660
650
150
0.11
0.2
5000
<3
4.0
170
0.15
166
0.0035
294
67
0.10
13.0
340
340
6860
320
20.0
5940
8.5
4.9
:
Units in mg/! vnlcss noted.
Tenp^raturt of sample whei.
?^ and p.i.
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Sol ids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Ac ids
Zinc
pK
11-21-72
1760
1 1 ,800
0.04
561
16,320
310
225
0.10
0.2
4500
160
0.17
320
301
63
0
2.4
270
330
6500
900
18.0
5700
8.0
5-2
11-30-72
1760
11,100
0.05
520
13,900
284
175
0.07
0.2
6000
4
3
163
0
146
0.0038
265
60
0.17
3-2
0
270
320
6160
132
0
114
15.0
5520
3 .3
4.9
12-19-72
1940
14,550
<0.1
601
16,510
558
175
0.10
0.2
5600
t ft
28I~
51
0.10
2.2
320
336
7040
16
15.0
3.5
5.0
1-10-73
I960
10,800
t 0.1
553
13,300
290
125
0.05
0.3
5500
6.1
*3
148
0.19
118
0.0102
224
39
0.26
1.6
206
250
6260
72
15.0
5500
5-0
4.9
1-23-73
1568
10,600
•^0.1
480
13,000
220
75
0.05.
0.4
4200
185
0.20
240
0.0150
242
60
0.34
2.4
223
304
5180
34
14.0
6.0
5.1
for DO, ;£ inc ph
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL C
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.0.0,
Chloride
Color (f,oJ.or, Units)
Copper ;
DlssQ|yed .Oxygep vppro.
E)ee*.,CCBd. ,u mhos/cm
FecjaJ, Cp,i|,, rlPN/lOQjl
Fe**} --^F^MC;^
" ' }ffl&& ;" <^l"9pB?ftM L b
Nlfpijflen -^Nitrate
Phpsp^hafe-Total , as P
''•p'SviiPP!'. i "., .•;;. ;i ;•
Potassium
So^um,,,,
Sot|dS - T.S.S.
So)l|dj.,,- Se|ttle. ml/1
Sulpiwt*
T^lratttre f°C)
VoUtlle Acids . .. . .
Zinc
pH
.2^6-73 '
1890
10,500
,!,:
i •
0.30L
• 3. '6
j i>*
' l44M
4600^
56 '
""
118;
15^5 '
4200
4.3
4.T
E
3*-27-73,
1575
9400
<0.05
; 425 "
10,100
293
; 100
''0.06
! 0.4
'; 2260
; -"it!
.!!?•-'
i 173
?00
104
?"l
176
,
o552
•ffi
f
1 i;6§
•1 ""23^
i 454ib
34
!
_^ »•
- lfe5— • -
2.8"
4.'9
4-10-73
1575
9000
<0.05
48b
11,200
205
75
!0.08 ~
: °.-3
1500 ?'°
ifiS
•f-"t
'jji0^8
ef ••'•'••
Dissolved OXygeri ppm'
Eh
Fes
£t :. ' Cohd'; ' u' (nhos/'tm
i
* • -
Fecpl ' i't rep: HPttf 100 '-ml
Ire
Le,
Ka<
He
Ni
Ml
NI
Ph
£<••''•' ••'•
jisSi.^;:'^
ries fiirn
Airy " c " "" "'-''" ' 'V-'J
t^;9 ^ rcj • ~»» . ,:^ •.
rogen * Ammonia "-
r"dgen * 6r"ganic ' '
rdgen'-'fJiWaie0 "'
spnate-fotal, as P
P.jt.B. ppb
Pokassium " '
Sojdium '
Sojllds - T.flis.
ScflVds - T.S.S.
sdllds - Settle, ml/1
SijlRhate
• ** n
Temperature- (PC) ^.~
Volatile Acids
Z|nc
p«
4-24-73
136$
9100
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
"Temperature"" (°C)
Alkalinity (CaC03)
8.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. )i mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids -T.S.S.
Solids - Settle. ml/I
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH.
Sulphate
1-7-72
13.0
0.8
7800
4.6
1-11-72
8.0
1.1
12,000
1-18-72
9.0
3050
20.400
0.1
1560
89,520
1300
0.4
1210
1.0
12,000
3-0
29,000,000
.2.0
560
0.003
19*
210
4.70
0.080
79.2
0***
910
980
21,010
238
£0.1
8850
95
4.6
2-15-72
18.5
4450
20,850
1300 .
26,300
550
1030
0.4
11,000
500
350
270
3.1
41.2
14,196
122
5.0
1040
3-2-72
16.5
4800
22,050
•CO.)
1400
29,800
440
0.25
980
1.1
9000
<0.5
500
0.0058
408
182
1.90
25
0
7"»0
900
16,252
32
8690
40
5.1
* Units In mg/1 unless noted
**Temperature of Sample when tested
***Detected
for DO, EC and pH.
.07 ppb Lindane.
Plate H-9A
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL D
COMPONENT *
ft*,O V
Temperature ( C)
Alkalinity (CaG03)
8.0.0.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. p mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. HPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/IOO ml
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium ,
Sodium .
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Sulphate
SAMPLE OATE
3-14-72
19.5
5950
24,000
1200
30,300
270
1020
O.I
12,000
3
23,000
450
378
306
3-0
40
15,994
88
0.15
8430
5.1
920
3-28-72
' 17.5
sow
22,800
1300
31,900
520
1020
0.4
10.000
<. 3
43,000
500
360 '
209
3.80
36.0
0.20
16,948
50
0.4
10,190
5.1
4-11-72
17.0
4950
21,750
< O.I
900
32.330
1700
<0.25
920
0.6
10,000
<3
2000
1.0
600
0.0028 >"
423
207
3-60
17-8
727
860
16,132
228
<0.1
8,300
40
/q*
4-25-72
. 20.0
4700
19,800
1000
30,700
900
1020
0.5
9000
<3
430,000
550
500
236
4.22
22.1
0
15,240
58
<0.1
10,200
5.2
5-9-72
19.0
55QO
23.100
<0.1
1000
33,640
600
<0.2
1090
0.2
12,500
6
<3
<1.0
500
0.0066
580
264
2.38
,
28.7
727
1020
16,110
409
<0.1
10,900
30
5-2
q20
* Units in mg/1 unless noted
**Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC, and pH.
Plate H-9B
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c 1 urn
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 m!
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
PhospKate-Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
5-23-72
5600
33,600
1300
36, 040
1090
360
0.1
12,200
< 3
21*0
360
720
332
3-1
32.0
0
17,970
40
0.)
18.5
11,400
5-2
6-6-72
5800
30 , 600
0.13
1800
34,524
1050
350
0.10
0.2
13,000
9.2
2300
0.5
420
0.0052
880
864
'3.0
27.7
760
950
14,610
50
O.C
908
20.0
11,300
30
5.1
6-20-72
4500
33.000
1200
33,040
1100
400
0.2
12,750
420
592
440
6.34
28.1
17,450
34
21.0
5-2
7-11-72
6500
25,950
<0.1
1320
35,060
1030
0.15
0.4
13,000
180
0.18
500
0.0090
560
142
0.16
12.4
800
880
21,220
75
23.5
10,750
28
5.2
7-25-72
7900
24,400
0.1
1416
36,400
1070
0.16
0.0
15,000
185
0.35
656
612
151
830
944
18,460
97
23.5
28
4.9
* Units In mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when (Sestet for DO, EC and pH.
Plate N-9C
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c 1 urn
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
8-8-72
7700
24,300
* 0.1
1440
28,610
1080
0.14
0.3
14,500
3
C3
175
0.64
510
0.012
570
149
0.08
10.0
780
1010
18,740
420
23.5
12,750
5.3
8-23-72
6000
21,550
1400
34,320
1070
250
0.4
15,200
535
638
156
2.6
23.0
20,540
264
25.0
5.1
9-7-72
7900
21 ,800
<0.l
1380
33,660
1080
250
0.15
0.1
13,000
9.2
<3
165
0.36
495
0.064
604
16!
0.2
16.0
0
740
888
18,900
480
*0.05
600
25.0
12,500
21-5
5.1
9-20-72
8000
22,500
1430
35,550
1250
290
0.8
14,000
545
596
167
0.2
15.0
20,200
102
22.0
5.0
10-11-72
3430
25,800
<: 0.1
1402
36,700
1159
290
0.25
0.0
14,000
-=3
<3
208
0.59
568
.0055
702
190
0
8.0
750
960
19,540
370
18.0
13,600
29.5
5-1
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Plate H-9D
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
' CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c 1 urn
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
recal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod ium
Solids • T.D.S.
Sclids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
! pH
10-211-72
4500
25,200
0.16
l}80
34,840
1200
370
0.10
O.k
15,500
185
0.47
508
630
180
0.1
4.0
800
1010
17,000
80
23.0
12,600
28.5
5.0
11-8-72
4900
25,800
0.09
1330
33,260
1100
375
0.35
0.2
10,000
< 3
< 3
185
0.32
560
0.0022
556
146
0.0
11.0
760
910
17,000
600
20.5
11,200
27.5
5.!
11-21-72
4600
25,200
0.04
1440
34,340
1520
225
0.32
0.05
9000
180
0.37
630
561
137
0.0
3.0
730
800
17,400
600
17.0
12,400
25.0
5.2
11-30-72
4700
27,250
0.05
1354
34,300
1560
260
0.11
0.15
12,000
<3
3
200
0.55
580
0.0045
580
134
0.05
4.4
0
690
880
17,380
412
0
467
14.0
12,800
11.5
5.2
12-19-72
4214
26,200
* 0.1
1402
27,250
1565
275
0.07
0.2
9750
522
101
0.4
1.8
584
848
14,980
90
13.0
21.5
5-2
* Units in rng/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of samp 1-5 vher •_est«'
~r, and
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkal inity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volati le Acids
Zinc
PH
1-10-73
4410
26,100
<0.1
1426
30,100
1174
150
0.29
0.4
12,250
6
3
200
0.43
560
0.0086
474
95
0.50
8.0
656
872
16,900
72
12.0
11,800
21.0
5.1
1-23-73
4214
25,700
<0.1
962
31,200
1062
100
0.08
0.2
8,600
230
0.40
552
0.0108
513
119
0.08
8.0
740
896
16,440
22
13.0
22.5
5.3
2-6-73
4620
18,200
^0.1
561
31,600
1129
75
0.11
0.7***
6750
<3-0
3.0
212
0.23
576
0.0160
498
107
0.18
5.6
740
928
16,720
28
13-0
12,200
17.8
4.8
2-27-73
1680
21,400
<0.05
1322
29,800
1225
175
0.12
0.4
7000
300
0.46
636
0.0123
500
128
0.36
2.2
640
948
16,360
66
13.0
17.6
5-5
3-13-73
4935
20,800
*0.05
1400
29,700
1320
150
0.09
0.5
7000
255
0.24
388
0.0047
480
90
O.I
1.8
0
610
888
16,880
72
440
14.0
12,100
16.9
5.0
Un i".3 i I*, rig/1 unless noted .
Ter ;"•"; •: lure of sorp1^ v:hen ;
.i:i.J for DO, U.
Plate H-5F
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium.
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecat Coli. MPN/100 ml
j Fecal .Strep. MPN/100 ml
VIS0'--
Lead,,
Magnesium
; ifcwy
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic .
Nitrogen - ,N I tra te
Pj*«h*H-Tot,l,, as,P
Potassium
Sod, t.um .
SoMds - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solid* - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
^>___- — • Aw tQ(*\
Volatile Acids
Z'nc
pH
3-27-73
5460
21,400
•ffl.05
1386
29,500
1380
ISO
0.12
0.3
6000
248
612
516
90
0.24
6.8
680
904
17,680
50
14.0
17-5
5.3
4-10-73
4410
24,200
*0.05
1386,
29,100
1115
100
0.08
0.3
6000
275
<0.1
556
0.0008
519
61 j
1,4 _•
6)0 :
880
17,280
52
- ;
17.0 j
12,300
14.0 •!
5.3 „.
4-24-73
4935
24,100
*0.05
1600
28,500
1160
125
0.06
0.8 '
6060
290
0.5ft j
604 ''
0.0030 \
563G '
77 i
0.48 - i
; 3,*,- i
640 i
856, !
16,970
68
17.0
15.0
5.4
5-15-73
4515
16,100
<0.05
1218
24,450
1450
0.04
0.5-
4800
240 •
o i
672 i
0 i
290 j
34 \
iJ2 ;
<^s •
280
880 .
15,600
32
316
18.7
9900
12.0
*•*-
6-5-73
4200
15.800
<0.05
1080
22,700
1565
0.10
0.4
6000
• ;
215 ;
9 ;
528
,,543. I
74 ;
0:.3" - ':
2.4 '•
14^00,
'9.5
7.6
S.5
* Units In mg/I unless noted.
** Tenperature of sample when tested for 00, EC and pH.
Plate H-9C
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL D
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D. :
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strepl MPN/100 ml
iron
Lead
W'-JCK; ~ ^
Magnesium
Mercury
!LOi.'
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-total, as f
f.C.t. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Sine ;
P* - ••• . ;
6-26-73
4410
15.500
<0.05
946
21,600
114S
0.08
0.40
5600
20 ;6
7.0
203
0:31
316
551
68
1.60
4.'."4;
260
408
14,600
257
24;5
95*0
8,5
'**'.'..
,.:.
*Units in mg/1 unVess noted. •
** Temperature of sample when tested for 00, EC and pH.
Plate H-9H
r I
L f
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL E
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity (CaCOj)
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Llect. Cond. u mhos/cm
recal Coll. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
1 ron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod i urn
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
12-15-71
6.5
12-2l-7'l
2.l|
3,200
6-5
1-1-72
704
1.730
<0.25
200
1,986
210
0.45
1.6
9
400
<2.0
150
0.004
11.6
350
1 .0
0.35
24
115
2,948
60
<0.l
13.0
480
0.15
5.8
1-1 1-72
0.8
2,200
0
8.0
i-iq-7^
626
1 ,020
170
1 ,430
170
450
1.6
2,000
240
24,000
ICO
4.40
55c
0.87
2.3
2,186
10.0
0. 1
8.0
6.2
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Plate H-IOA
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL E
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Eltct. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Col !. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
2-15-72
620
1(80
130
216
102
1)20
<0.2
1.1
UOO
•<0.5
100
0.0005
6.1
13.2
0.6
2.6
8. it
71
1212
54
0.0 .
18.0
552
<0.1
5.7
3-2-7Z
<0.1
3-14-72
550
2580
300
600
6.6
5.6
27.0
0.8
3.0
' 25
120
2800
2*0
1
0.0
22.5
430
6;5
10-211-72
3720
16,300
0.09
1060
24,450
750
liltO
0.12
0.6
7000
6.1
2k, 000
453
0.60
736
0.0)1(5
220
HO
0.3
3-0
0
3*0
361.
13,200
940
300
20.0
1.67
' 5.2 .
11-30-72
30W
25.250
0.06
1080 '
33,300
950
375
0.08
O.k
9000
"3
<3
483
0.32
544
0.0050
382
132
0
3.2
610
656
15, 400
1(20
456
6.5
1 1 ,800
6.5
4.9 -
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for 00, EC and pH.
Plate H-IOB
-------
LEACHATE ANALYSIS
CELL £
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Col i . MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature * (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
1-23-73
4700
33,200
•iO.I
1360
1(1,700
823
175
0.1
0.3
9000
^3.0
3.0
370
0.60
536
0.0)12
602
248
0
6.4
1040
880
18,420
60
8.0
13.900
41.0
5.1
3-13-73
11,025
40,000
.to. 05
1844
58,100
1565
"•25
0.19
0.6
9500
< 3.0
< 3.0
478
0.45
676
0.0044
690
35
0
5.6
0
1400
1110
26,680
164
958
14.0
18,100
56.4
4.8
4-24-73
8910
50,500
<0.05
2160
51,900
1760
375
0.32
0.6
8000
3.0
<3.0
520
0.21
896
0
895
483
0.40
10.0
1430
12)6
31,680
80
17.0
19,200
64.0
5.2
6-5-73
5250
42,800
*0.05
2600
62,000
1565
0.10
0.4
20,000
525
0.42
896
946
531
0
16.0
1320
1264
30,000
19.0
58
5.2
6-26-73
8925
47,300
<0.05
2605
65,600
1830
0.10
0.20
9800
< 3.0
<3-0
500
0.73
956
0
946
560
0.48
3.6
1470
1344
35.240
1106
29.0
19,560
61
5.3
* Units in m$/l unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Plate HMCC
-------
WATER ANALV5IS
WATER ADDED TO CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkal ini ty (CaCO )
3
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Ca !c ium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
CJect. Cond. u mhos/cm
recal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
1 ron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod i urn
Sol ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Sol ids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volati ie Acids
Zinc
.
pri
12-28-71
0.0
1 .0
36
850
73
5
7.6
750
<3
---
36
0. 1
0. 00
0.10
0
502
1 .0
N 1 L
432
7. 2
3-2-72
8.8
650
15.0
•7.8
_3- 14-22
9.2
700
18.0
7-6
4-1 1-72
8.9
750
14.0
4-25-72
304
3.0
'j : - dfld pH .
WATER ANALYSIS
WRIER ADDED TO rrr.T. c
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkal ini ty
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Col i. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Sol Ids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature " (°C)
Volati le Acids
Zinc
pH
5-9-72
9.8
600
19.0
7.5
.
5-23-72
7.0
750
21.0
7.7
6-6-72
7.2
675
7.8
6-20-72
7.0
900
19-0
7.9
7-11-72
7.3
800
214.0
7.9
i:d for C,"
-------
WATER ANALYSIS
WATER ADDED TO CELL C
oj>
~~"
. SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
7-25-72
330
0
0
22
12
57
0.07
6.4
800
0.5
0.15
16
0.0102
- — _.
7.9
152
536
<0.5
32
23.5
0
0.09
7.3
8-8-72
7.4
800
19.5
7.8
9-7-72
7.0
825
2J.S
7.9
10-11-72
8.0
800
16.0
'1
8.0
11-8-72
9.4
950
14.5
' •
8.0
* Units In mg/1 unless noted. .
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
PIateH-lie
WATER ANALYSIS
WATER ADDED TO CELL C
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/ cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium ,
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
11-30-72
30*
'2
0
43
2
56
4
0.04
9.0
850
<3
4
0.3
0
11
0.0105
0
0
0.23
0
5.7
132
440
25
10
0.03
8.0
1-10-73
9.4
700
9
7.6
2-6-73
8.6
650
12.5
7.4
3-27-73
292
0
28
0
50
0.06
8.8
800
0.20
0
29
0
8.7
124
480
0
38
14.0
0.07
7.7
'6-26-73
286
p
26
4.0
49
•o
6.3
980
<3-0
C3-0
0.2
0
17
0.0002
0
0
0.56
8.5
24
1040
97
30.1
0.06
7.9S
* Units -in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Plate H-11D
-------
GROUNDVATER ANALYSIS
WELL 1
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Temperature (°C)
Alkalinity (CaCOj)
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. p mhos/cm
Fecal Coll . MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Kltrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Sol ids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
Sul phate
1-3-72
15.0
8.3
7-3
1-18-72
11.0
202
31
<0.05
78
8.58
<0.2
60
6.8
750
15
<0.5
40
0.0003
0.160
o-30
0.013
0
2.35
96.0
636
0.9
7-3
3-2-72
15.5
88
3
<0.1
10
120
<0.2
27
5.8
260
2400
<0.5
43
0 .0004
0 .084
1.07
3.15
50
716
1.2
7-1
.0..2
3-14-72
23.0
184
60
5.4
400
508
7-3
3-28-72
15.5
124
53
6.4
430
452
7.1
* Units in mg/1 unless
**Tempera tu re of samp 1e
noted
when tested for DO, EC, and pH.
Plate H-12A
r:
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
' 'WELL 1 '
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Temperature (°C)
Alkalinity (CaCO,)
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Ca 1 c i um
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Col 1. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep.MPN/100 ml
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Kltrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -tota 1 , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Sulphate
4-M-72
17.5
121
2
. <.0.1
11
16
< 0.25
58.5
'5.8
400
23
< 1.0
45
0 . 0050
0
0.74
3.1-
64.8
486
0.1
4-25-72
16.0
122
60
6.5
410-
.470
7.1
5-9-72
20.0
136
2
<:o.l
12
23
<0.2
51
4.0
450
460
<1.0
20
0.0047
0.149
0.50
5-9
75
296
O.I
.7-4
5-23-72
18.0
134
54
4.3
450
482
7-3
6-6-72
17.0
. 132
38
62
4.2
475
4
0.096
0.12
•-•-—-.-
4.9
78
272
7.0
* Units in mg/1 unless
**Tempe?tature of sample
noted
when tested
for. DO, EC, and pH.
Plate H-12B
-------
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
WELL 1
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
7-11-72
2.9
520
22.5
7-3
7-25-72
200
0
19
<0.02
A. 2
525
0
0
6
0.0075
0
2.4
78
22.0
40.05
7.4
8-8-72
4.2
500
21.0
7.3
9-7-72
160
0
10
3
59
0
8.3
500
4.9
0
17
0.0047
2.0
98
366
19
22.0
0.08
7.2
10-11-72
4.8
530
19.0
7.2
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Plate«-12C
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
WELL 1
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkal in! ty
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/IOO ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead
Magnes lum
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature' " (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
11-8-72
4.8
500
19.0
7.3
11-30-72
140
"2
0
16
2
108
0.05
6.3
600
150
460
12.9
0
12
0
0
0.95
1.5
70
560
73
15.0
O.i»
7.4
12-19-72
0
1-10-73
9.2
850
13.0
7.2
2-6-73
7.4
320
12.5
6.9
* Units in mg/l unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Plate H-120
-------
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
WELL 1
COMPONENT *
Alkal inity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen pptn
Elect. Cond. xi mhos/cm
Fecal Col i. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Mitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Sol ids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Sol ids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
3-13-73
98
0
14
3
73
0.08
12.2
380
28
0
18
0
2.9
59
600
72
14.5
0.11
7.1
6-26-73
130
0
\t>
9.6
50
0.06
2.6
675
<3.0
4.0
27
0
19
0.0004
0.1
'•3
0.8
4.0
73
960
30
35.0
0.76
7.15
SAMPLE DAT
-
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC .and pH,
tor L>" " a:
Plat; H-'2E
-------
GROUNOWATER ANALYSIS
WELL 2
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity (CaCO )
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect.Cond. ^i mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate (total)
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Soljos - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH '
Sulfate
1-18-72
158
1
<0.05
8.3
0
2.0
25
5.2
400
3
•CO. 5
40
.0004
.016
.38
.003
2.12
38
1372
0.8
7.15
3-14-72
!42
2
0.1
21
5-6
.01
26
6.3
340
< 3
<1 .0
21
.0009
.096
0.1
11
27
286
0.3
7.2 '
3-28-72
132
•'
31
4.7
350
218
7.0
4-11-72
132
1
< 0.1
11
11.0
< 0. 25
19.7
6.6
320
< 3
< 1.0
30
.00019
0.0
1.4
26.2
272
< 0. 1
4-.2S-72
140
33
6-1
320
0.0
208
7.|
* Units in mg/l unless noted
Plate H-13A
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
WELL 2
COMPONENT *
Temperature"" (°C)
Alkalinity (CaCO.)
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Conii. p mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/10'0 ml
Fecal Strep- MPN/100 ml
Lead
Magnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Kitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Hi trl te
Phosphate -Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
Sulphate
5-9-72
! t . '•>
U6
4 0.1
21
12
< 0.2
23
6.0
330
7
< 1.0
30
0.0062
0.112
0.09
I.I.
30
198
. O.I
7-3
5-23-72
20.0
136
21
3-8
360
228
7-1
SAMPLE DATE
6-6-72
19.0
130
9
0.12
'•5
22
'0.2
30
7-5
1130
*- 3
0.15
29
0.0057
0.160
0.05
2.1
2S.5
158
0.14
7.0
7-11-72
iy.o
4.5
360
7.0
.7-25-72
2J.U
6.2
400
0
7.6
* Unit' in iiKj/1 un)i;ss
** Temperature of sample
noted
when tested for DO,
EC and pK.
Plate M-I3B
-------
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
WELL 2
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D,
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Fleet. Cond. u mhos/cm
. ecal Coll. HPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. HPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature** (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
8-8-72
6.1
360
20.0
7.3
9-7-72
155
0
20
0
20
0
5.0
380
0.4
0
24
0.0025
1.45
44
212
10
22.5
0.08 -
7-'
10-11-72
4.2
370
18.5
7.0
11-8-72
5.2
450
19.5
7-3
11-30-72
150
*1
0
58
1
?o
0.03
7.*
360
<3
4.0
0.7
0
16
0.0060
0
0
0.25
0.7
38
238
8
14.0
0.04
7.4
* Units in rog/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Plate H-13C
BROUNOWATER ANALYSIS
WELL 2
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coll. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature** (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
12-19-72
0.2
1-10-73.
5.6
360
12.0
7.2
2-6-73
6.4
310
12.0
6.7
3-13-73
134
0
32
1
48
0.05
11.5
450
0-3
0
15
.0080
1.0
28
160
10
15.0
0.04
7-3
6-26-73
155
0
19
10.4
18
0
6.4
260
3.0
4600
1.6
0
22
0.0004
0.3
1.1
0.64
1.4
34
840
8
35.6
0.16
7.1
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Plate H-13D
-------
GROUNDV/ATER ANALYSIS
WELL 3
GROUNDVIATER ANALYSIS
WELL 3
CO
-•J
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Temperature (°C)
Alkalinity (CaCO )
B.O.D.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Uni ts)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cond. p nihos/cm
Fecal Col i. MPN/IOO ir.l
Fecal Strep.MPN/100 ml
Lead
Kagnes ium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Hitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.O.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volat i le Acids
Zinc
pH
Sul phate
1-18-72
12.0
118
9
< 0,05
40
0
< 0.2
13
6.0
350
4
<0.5
30
0.0004
0.016
2.25
0.003
0
1.88
14.5
276
0.3
7.1*
3-2-72
15.0
78
2
<• 0.1
26
126
<0.2
10
6.6
250
930
<0.5
20
0-0012
0.048
2.00
1.9
14.0
304
.05
7-2
17.2
3-14-72
20.5
116
43
5.0
330
108
7.2
3-28-72
16.0
112
24
6.8
320
214
7.1
4-11-72
17-0
118
2
< 0.1
21
5
< 0.25
13-3
6.4
300
< 3
< 1.0
17
0 .0015
0.04
2.19
1.7
13.5
672
< 0.1
* Units in mg/1 unless
** Temperature of sample
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT * .
Temperature ( C)
Alkalinity (CaCO )
B.O.D.
^adm i urn
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect .Cond. p mhos/cm
Fecal Col i . MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep .MPN/100 ml
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate-Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sod i urn
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Sulphate
4-25-72
16.0
122
31
6.3
320
202
7.2
5-9-72
19.5
146
2
< 0.1
24
331
<0.2
13
7.2
300
460
< 1.0
20
0.0048
0.088
1-52
1.5
15
366
0.1
7.3
5-23-72
19.0
106
12
3-9
300
214
'
7-1
6-6-72
18.0
102
5
0.15
2.)
38
0.25
19
6.2
300
43
0.20
&
0.0027
0
2.60
2.6
13.8
278
0.22
7.2
7-11-72
22.5
6.2
310
7.1
noted
,when tested for DO, EC, and pH.
Plate H-14 A
t*
* Units in mg/1 unless noted
** Temperature of sample when tested for 00, EC, and prt.
Plate H-146
-------
GRDtJNDWATER ANALYSIS
HELL 3
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT * . . ..
Alkalinity
B.0.0.
Cadmium
Calcium
C.6.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
fleet. Cond. u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Iroq
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
7-25-72
6.2
400
0
22.0
7.5
8-8-72
V
6,7,
300%
. ;
.•,
" ' *
20.0
7.4
9-7-72
120
15
22.0
0.06
7-1
10- 1 1-7.2
•ft
M
}M
*)
c
f i
V -Jit
19.0
7.2
11-8-72
5.0
350
20.0
7.2
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC a.n.d pH.
Plate H-14C
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
WELL 3
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
B.0.0.
Cadmium
ta lei ura
C.O.D.
Chloride
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect. Cone), u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
1 ren
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen r Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Sulphate
Temperature'" (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
11-30-72
110
•<1
0
50
1
2 If
0.03
7.6
300
23.0
93-0
0.4
0
15
0.8051
0
0
4.50
0.5
20
210
18
14.0
0.04
7.2
12-19-72
0
1-10-73
7.4
350
12.0
7.2
2-6-73
*•?
360
12.0
6.7
3-13-73
150
0
ltd
0
29
0.05
11.2
350
0.2
0
25
0
0.8
32
160
27
15.0
0.07
7.3
* Units in mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of sample when tested for 00, EC and pH.
Plate H-14D
-------
ANALYSES
i,j9f*J H-tiC
?•((
Oxygen ppm
"ihos/cm
Cot '
3-38-72 >
HbMMOO
flen " Organi
e -Total, as P
I Solids - T.S.S.
: Acids
3-5
••-tr.-r-
..6,8-
I ••;•»-
6,,7.
:*.*
Zinc
par—
| Sulphate
* Units in.mg/1 unless noted* f.,.BO er and DH
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC, and pH
I
1
r
1
i
j
1 1
T
T
V.L
m \
M
1
4-J
12.0
106
10
0.05
200
o
1.2
27
5-5
300
<»3
< 0.5
300
1.0006
3.163)0
e o
0.08
0.010
0
2.10
13-0
2*
0
n.oi'i
30
0012
1 .23*00
J-Q
0.30
] S8 '
i °
r*s
i »*5
t 262
; ;»
: ,-A-'..r.
|l8.0 I
il» ;1
«
I ' M
i :'t
1
J
24 :•
4.3R
300* "8<4
n-a
0
rg
#rd
<1'0
m
**t
S'8
S3
i
] " '
,,,
! 2i*<--
11 ':-'
i.
i .1
i
i
<
B
.
L
f
J
1.0
'22
2 "i
- , : 1
0. r 1
20 ^
"
0.25
16.7
5-9
3db*5»lt
<"3«
o 1
< Ut»?
35
1.0033
0^0
*'*
O.'O?
Jj
5
l.¥
16.&
1)04
^ :^
.
•
3-v; •.!
17
,
«
L
u
!
.0
132
1
! j
1
1
28 1
.8 1
:so 1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
. 1
2>(8
J
1
Plate H-IJA
-POUHDVATEP ANALYSIS
V.'tLL '•
COMPONENT ^ 1 S-9'72 I 5-"'72 I
Temperature"" (°C) 1
[Alkalinity (CaCOj) J
B.O.D.
1 Cadmium 1
I Calcium 1
1C. 0.0. 1
I Color (Color Units) 1
1 Copper 1
=_=— — -r—
19-0
11(0
2 1
>• n 1 1
^ U . 1 1
2? 1
1
12 1
< 0.2
7S
Chloride 1 " 1
1 1 5 0 1
1 Dissolved Oxygen ppm 1
1 Elect. Cond. p mhos/cm 1 j
1 Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml 1
Fecal Strep.MPN/100 ml
1 LCad
JKagnesium |
1 Mercury
1 Nitrogen - Ammonia
I Nitrogen -, Organic
I Nitrogen - Nitrate
I Nitrogen - Nitrite
1 Phosphate-Total, as P
JP.C.B. ppb
j Potassium
I Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Sulphate
V 1
«£ 1.0 '
0.027
0.112
0.16
1 1-9
1 24
j 202
1
I 0.2
1 6.6
J
"^
18.0
120
15 I
• l(.0
300
6-6-72 1 7-11-^ >"-72
=BB»B»=l^==i===^^^S^^^^
1
"'
0.18
_ A 1
21.0
2.8 I . i
^1 1
3
0,59
22
3.Z
310
< 3 1
O'^ft
.at
90
0.009*.
0.20*
0.3S
1
;
256
Z.i
ta
32*
..
1 1 °~y*
6.7 | 6Jf
5.5 1
240
i '
19.0 1
1
4.0 1
400 1
1
1
i
0 1
1 1
6.9 7'3 !
| 1 1
* Units in mg/1 unless noted
** Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC an*pH.
Plate H-15B
-------
r 7i t
GftOUNOMATER ANALYSIS
4IEU *
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Alkalinity
0.0.0.
CadMlwp
Calclu*
C.0.0.
Chloride
Color (Color Unit*)
Cooper
Dissolved Oxygen pp»
CUetv Cond. n *tos/o»
Fecal Colt. HPN/IOO stl
focal Strap. HPN/IOO ml
Iron
Lead '
MagnesltM
Narcury
nitrogen - Avwnla
•Itrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Phosphate-Total, a* P
P.C.I, ppb
Potass tun
Sod tup
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids -Settle, ml /I
Sulphate
Temperature** (°C)
Volatile Acids
Zinc
PH
8-8-72
«.o
310
18.0
6.6
»-J-72
'J5
0
32
0
to
0
5.0
-,-;fOO
1.1
0
is
0.0037
1.40
21
186
18
22.0
0.04
6.6
M-15-72
130
0
/O.I
26
0
22
0.02
.-».*.'
•' ^ •:
«3.0 i
•3.0
1.8
0
I7.S
0.00*8
0
0
O.I
0
1.16
28
288
23
73
16.0
0.06
6.9
3-27-73
too
0
32
1
13
0.06
5.6
. "•'•'••HO ..• .';
1,65
0
21
0.0*16
1.2
. 17.5
280
35
17.5
0.05
6.4
Units In mg/1 unless noted.
Temperature of sample when tested for DO, EC and pH.
Plate H-15C
-------
WATER ANALYSIS REPORT
PH. 1419) 368-3329
EDISON WAY AT I t TH AVENUE
WATER. WASTE WATER AND AIR POLLUTION
CHEMISTS AND ENGINEERS
P. O. BOX 2266
MENLO PARK. CALIF. 94O2S
ESTABLISHED 1927
LABORATORY FACILITIES FOR ALL
"STANDARD METHODS" TESTS
REPORT TO • Terratech, Inc.
• 193 E. Gish Road
. San Jose, California
95112
SOURCE OF , DATE c /I c DATE , /o ,- _
SAMPLE HammeJ. REC'D D/^D REPORTED o/*//.u
ANIONS
Nitrate (NO.)
Chloride (Cl)
Sulphate (SO,)
Bicarbonate (HCOj )
Carbonate (CO3 )
Phosphate (PO« )
MILLIGRAMS
2.8
38.
11.
181.
0.0
0.1
Total Equivalents Per Million
CATIONS
Sodium (No)
Potassium (K)
Calcium (Ca)
Magnesium (Mg)
MILLIGRAMS
20.
0.40
24.
25.
Total Equivalents Per Million
EQUIVALENTS
0.04
1.07
0.23
3.00
0.00
0.00
4.34
0.87
0.01
1.20
2.06
4.14.
DETERMINATION
Phenolphtholein AlkalinityfCaCOa )
Methyl Orange Alkalinity (CaCOj )
Total Hardness (CaCOj)
Calcium Hardness (CaCOj)
Magnesium Hardness (CaCOj)
Total Solids - Calculated
Total Solids - Evaporation
Loss On Ignition
Total Fixed Residue
Sp. Cond. - Micromhos 25°C
MILLIGRAMS
PER LITER
0.0
148
164
60
104
233
245
346
DETERMINATION
Silica (SiO. )
Iron (Fe)
Manganese (Mn)
Boron (B)
Fluoride (F)
Hyd. Ion Cone. (pH)
MILLIGRAMS
PER LITER
20
0.77
0.03
0.1
0.33
t,'
7.24
THIS IS AN APPROVED COMMERCIAL WATER LABORATORY DESIGNATED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
COMMENTS.
ORIGINAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Reported by
FORM c »/««
PLATE H-16A
191
-------
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
CELL ACE SUBDRAIN
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
CELL A S E SUBDRAIN
f\5 ' -..
f
t-1
t
.,
""•
1 .
1 •
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Temperature (°C)
Alkalinity (CaCO^)
B.O.D. r <
Cadmium
Calcium
C.o.o.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
IJHlorlde ^ ' $'
Dissolved Oxygerf ppnt •
Eliftt.Cond. a mhos/cm '
pVcat Coli .MPN/100 ml
F«ca{ Strep. MPN^l 00 mi-
lead^
Magne,slun , :
i ' :
Mercur» i ; , : ,.
Nitrogen - Ammonia ;
Nitrogen - Organic' -
KUrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate-Total, as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, ml/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Sulphate
12-8-7,1 ,
I
. 116 ;
0
.10
it
5
'23
, 1
I * 4
' ^ . ^
t
22
' '
!'"•" '
216
5-6
1-7-72
15.0
\ t ( *
;
2." 4
2.1(00
i.l
< »
1,*
''•»
'.1
j
i
5.8
2-15.-72
.16.5 :
* ^ • '
.' ' ' •
i
'
**
%*
2.1
i
i
•
' • '
' '
5.5
3- t4 -72
17.5
t
11
3
3
10
!
i
j
S-1*
3-28-72
16.0 i
1
4.9
300
i
i
[ '•
j
5.5
* Units in mg/1 unless
** Temperature of sampl
noted
e when tested for DO, EC, and pH.
SAMPLE DATE
COMPONENT *
Temperature (°C)
Alkalinity (CaCO )
8.0.0.
Cadm i urn
Calcium
C.O.D.
Color (Color Units)
Copper
Chloride
Dissolved Oxygen ppm
Elect.Cond. ^u mhos/cm
Fecal Coli. MPN/100 ml
Fecal Strep. MPN/100 ml
Lead
Magnesium
Mercury
Nitrogen - Ammonia
Nitrogen - Organic
Nitrogen - Nitrate
Nitrogen - Nitrite
Phosphate -Total , as P
P.C.B. ppb
Potassium
Sodium
Solids - T.D.S.
Solids - T.S.S.
Solids - Settle, mi/1
Volatile Acids
Zinc
pH
Sulphate
it-25-72
17-0
•
5-3
350
5-5
5-23-72
17.0
*.9
350
5.7
6-6-72
7.4
340
5.9
6-20-72
18.5
5.2
320
6.7
7-11-72
20.5
5.5
350
5.7
Plate H-17A
* Units in mg/1 unless
**Temperature of sample
noted
when tested for DO, EC, and pH.
Plate H-17B
-------
GROUNOWATER ANALYSIS
SAMPLE DATE
tOHPONEHT f
9-7-7=
lli-30-72
l-10r73
3-27-73;
-T—
Alkallnltyt
fe.O.D. 1
Cadmium j
JC^IcluiiH ; *
•chiorrW
Dto&fcd
WMB-W
Mercury
Nitrogen
Nitrogen
i—TT~A3
Nitrogen
roMMnu
**»&•
V«>ellle
100 ml
>r Un i 0
ra
3-1
5'3
16
150 i
0 :
AS :
i :
18 •
|
0.06;
i
6.0 j
Ii20 i
0.13
0
13
e44*»
1.1 f
30 j
220 !
1*1
...SJL.L..
* Units In mg/1 unless noted.
** Temperature of
PH.
Plate H-17C
-------
OOSfftVATION WELLS AMD PIEZOMETERS
tat
DATE
MI-72
3-t-72
V.lfc.T*
™1™/*
l-»l-72
4-11-72
V2S-72
$-9-72
MS-72
(W-7I
**»•!»*
f»2*-72
W-7I
>Wi
«»-H-n
iH-li
ll-JO-Tt
I«-1»-7J
1-10-71
«^-73
9-U:7J
I-I7-7J
**IO-73
S-15-73
«-»-73
1
4.5
t.O
S.7
f.5
5.7
5.7
S.I
5.7
«.o
-
«.1
4.1
(.4
t.t
5.9
*.7
M
2.1
1.7
l.«
3.9
MEI
2 "
7.0
1.0
7.2
7-1
7.J
7.*
7.5
7.*
S.1
-
.1
.2
.1
.3
.»
».2
3.J
3.1
-
3.*
4.2
7.*
.IS
3
1.5
7.0
4.5
«.J
4.2
4.*
(.4
$.«
7i7 ,
-
*.k
9.1
9.7 •
*.9
*.7
3.1
2.%
3-«
-
3.a
3.1
k
18.5
19.0
11.5
11.7
11.9
11.9
19.0
19.1
19.3
I9.»
19.5
I7.«
14.1
1
10.0
*.<
J.4
a.3
2.4
-
2.2
1.1
O.I
0.7
2
1.0
1.4
1.7
1.S
i.9
- •
1.9
••>
0.0
0.0
HEI»
3
HOM
J*
4.0
A3
2.4
• •
2.1
1.1
0.9
0.5
«TE»S
4
.
5
4
PLATE HH8A
-------
CUMULATIVE LEACHATE PRODUCTION
Dete
12-7-71
12-15-71
12-19-71
12-28-71
1-3-72
1-11-72
1- 1 8-72
2- 15-72
3-2-72
3-14-72
3-2R-72
4- 11 -72
4-25-72
9-7-72
10- 15-72
10- 1 7-72
10-18-72
10-19-72
10-20-72
10-21-72
10-24-72
1 1-8-72
1 1-27-72
12-6-72
12- 1 1-72
12-18-72
12-21-72
(1)
Ce! 1 A - Ga' Ions
Tr
Tr
T r
Tr
Tr
Tr
0. 3
0. 3
0.3
0. 3
0. 3
0. 3
0.8
30.8
50. 8
--
80.8
80.8
80.8
81.8
81.8
81 .8
81 .8
81 .8
81 .8
84.3
(2)
Cell R - Gallons
830
833
834
837
838
83?
838
838
838
838
838
838
838
89?
958
1018
10&3
1093
1153
1 164
1 164
1 164
1 164
1 1 6 •'-
1 164
1 164.5
(3)
Cell E - Gs ) lens
Tr
0 . 1
0 . 1
0. 3
0.7
0.9
1 .9
2 . 1
2 .2
2 .2
2 .2
2 .2
-
-
17.2
-
22 .2
22.2
22.2
23.7
46.2
71 .2
81.2
?C .2
116.2
116.7
(!) An estimated 1710 gallons of rainwater added to Cell A during
cons t rue 11 on.
(2) An estimated 7268 gallons of rainwater and 34,000 gallons of
additional water added to Cell B to obtain field capacity.
(3) An estimated 7420 gallons of rainwater and 27,000 aallons of
septic tank pumpings added to Cell E during construction.
PLATE H-19A
CUMULATIVE LEACHATE PRODUCTION
bete
12-26-72
1-4-73
1-1 1-73
1-18-73
1-26-73
2-1-73
2-8-73
2-15-73
2-22-73
3-1-73
3-8-73
3- 15-73
3-22-73
3-29-73
't-5-73
14-12-73
4-19-73
4-26-73
5-3-73
5-10-73
5-17-73
5-24-73
5-31-73
6-7-73
6-14-73
6-21-73
6-28-73
(1)
Cell A - Ga' Ions
8(4.3
114.3
1 114.3
119.3
135. 3
140.3
140. 3
140.3
145.8
145. 6
145.8
145.8
145.8
145.8
145.8
145.8
145. C
146.0
146.0
146.C
146.0
146.5
146.5
146.5
146.5
146.5
146.5
(2)
Cell B - Gallons
1164.5
1164.5
1 164.5
1 164.5
1 165
1 165
1 165
1 165
1170.5
1170. 5
1)70. 5
1170.5
1 170.5
1 170.5
1 170.5
1170.5
1 170.5
1171.0
1171-0
1171.0
1171.0
1171.0
1171.0
1171-0
1171.0
1171.0
1171.0
(3)
Cell E - Gallons
146.7
241.7
341.7
459-7
590.2
782.2
980.2
1171.2
1352-7
1490. 7
1632.7
1753.7
1775-7
1874.7
1959.7
204 1 . 7
2120.7
2189 .2
2253.2
2314.2
2368.2
2417.7
2465.7
2414.7
2464.7
2505.7
2548.7
PLATE H-19B
-------
LYSIMETER SAMPLE FIELD ANALYSIS
IO
Lys imeter
Location
Cell A -
4 feet below
bottom of Cell
Cell A -
8 feet below
bottom of Cell
Cell E -
8 feet below
bottom of Cell
Date
1-18-72
2-15-72
3-14-72
5-23-72
6-20-72
9-20-72
12-19-72
4-10-73
1-18-72
2-15-72
3-14-72
5-23-72
6-20-72
9-20-72
12-19-72
4-10-73
12-15-71
1-18-72
2-15-72
3-14-72
5-23-72
6-20-72
9-20-72
12-19-72
4-10-73
Vo I ume
ml
200
30
30
70
50
30
50
blocked
400
200
50
240
250
400
150
0
50
300
35
• 50
35
50
30
50
blocked
PH
5.6
7.1
7.1
6.5
8.4
5.9
6.5
5.7 ;
7.0
7.4
6.S i
7.3 -
6.4 i
6.8 ;
'
7.4
6.6
7.4 '
6.9
7.1
8.3
7.2
7.0
D.O."
ppm
5.0
8.4
7.8
9.0
-
9-0
-
1.3
9.3
ioio
912
9.6
10.2
5:9
8.7
8.0
10.4
-
8.9
-
E.C.
p mhos/en
380
-
-
-
-
-
- is-:;
310
_
_
ito
275
300
290
-
-
-
-
- **
Water samples are collected from lysimc-ters by displacing the sample with
air from a pressurized tank. This procedure thoroughly aerates the sample.
Insufficient quantity for D.O. or E.C. tests.
PI,HeH-71A
-------
SOLUTION ANALYSIS
SUty Sand
Determination - mg/1
AfkaHnlty
Calcium
Electrical Conductivity
Magnesium
Potassium
• ! i i ' : : : ; i ;
SIQfl 1 Uin • ' '
f., - > : • . .-.-I
* i •' i-i • r : : i :
Time After Immersion
t week
170™
30
500"""
30
3.5
i i
31
! i 7.2T
;•!... -j ...'•:' ' . ' '• ': I : '•• '• i
•"I •. J ; • i • i .... p
f
•'! T •[ -.- ;-"Y -•-':• •'V':;--
"nifr
Alkalinity
Calcium
Electrical Conductivity
Magnesium ^
Potassium
Sodium
PH
6 months
~~^
; 500
23
~~ 1.85
i i ConcrSete ;34nd?;Sirl
! , ^ ! jo: i o ; o o : o
1 year
168
600
29
17.0
8.8
2 years
: . ." ::; i. "** i
. .1 -. ^. ; ^ - * U \ |
is ;~ J2|(
170
28
500
31
2.2
31
7.2
_6 mohtjhf
170
36
500
23
1.75.
31.6
7.9
; ] year
- ^™ .. ^..
168 ;
32
soa
28
1.8
32
8.7
_J_VWrsj !
' - •"- •."' j •». '
1 1 I : i
i .."'':
• ; 1 '...:••: ;
! I •! ' ; ; ; ; ij's
(A^a >£»' f^tfn*! n ^ t* 'f'TM*! "«> '• tn/T-/'! Jr*-~
jUetfirini no t ion - -"»yr * ? .
AlkLlfnlty
3f£l«ic tr lea I CpnditctlV-liy
-I • 1 • '. i i ! i ! 1 |
Magnesium
C i- i • • : ' ';
"; Potassium
-'* . i ' i • ' T j
|pH] ,„;.,, = .. ;,,is:.;J,,L|,,L
'....-' :... .'.. ; •. ...... .,-.,. :....i. ;._l_i
• •
— 14-
1
i
i
1
j
!
i
isb
i
P
i i
] .L
i i
18C
|33
iJo/
!« ^
L
si?
Fa
s
L
,
9
*i
0
0
3
(C|r
j
I
i
i
~ *
ajv<
1
ft
i
j
AJ
W
i
|
j'
t "
m
k.
fie! After
sntHs '
'$0 I
1! 1"^
116 ,
-li-AcL :
2^1
JAl ,
i ;
i i :
• Immersion
41 VW^f
T
»9,0
- 40
! ,460,
i
25
.0-
31
j , \ • i
I a- n* ! -E. j m * n .
! ; i
"
1
v
s ^ ^ ' '
,* ye0r^s -
" ] < . -;
> - > i
i' '^
' .. •-
l - • " '
H * - - -i —
Plate H-22A
-------
RAINFALL. EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
NOV.
1971
,
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
\k
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2k
25
26
27
28
29
30
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.29
0.25
O.OS
0.96
1.52
EVAP.
RUNOFF
CELLS A * E
METER
READING
"
TOTAL
GALLONS
™*
"
CELL B
METER
READING
TOTAL
GALLONS
REMARKS
No Evaporation <
runoff, data was
for this month.
Evaporation reported In Inches
PLATE H-23A
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
DEC.
1971
1
2
3
V
5
6
7
8
9
»0
II
12
I)
1*
IS
It
»7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.50
0.32
0.2*
0.27
0.09
0.01
0-77.
0.05
0.51
0.22
0.06
' -.77
0.03
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
JAN.
1972
1
2
3
!)
5
6
7
8
9
10
ri
12
13
\k
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
o. 13
0.09
o. n
0.25
0.28
0.01
0.58
0.03
1.1(8
CVAP.
,
RUNOFF
CELLS A s E
METER
READING
TOTAL
GALLONS
CELL B
METER
READING
TOTAL
GALLONS
REMARKS
No evaporat i on c
runoff data was
for this non th .
Evaporation reported in Inches
PLATE H-23C
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
FEE
1972
1
2
3
_5
6
8
9
10
1]
12
'3
I';
'5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
^k
25
26
27
28
29
30
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0. 50
0.81)
_]_. 30
- ---
0.39
0.02
0.03
0.08
0. 15
3.31
- - -
-- -—-
CELLS A
METER
READING
— - - —
RUNG
S. E
TOTAL
GALLONS
- —
FF
CELL
C.ETEK
READING
._
6
TOTAL
GALLONS
--
- --- --
Fvaporation reported in Inches
REMARKS
No evaporation or
runoff data was tak
for this month.
PLATE H-23D
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
RAINKALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
MARCH
1972
1
2
3
M
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
11)
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2A
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0. 10
0.08
0.05
0.25
0.48
EVAP.
.160
.128
.032
.077
.077
.192
.077
. 160
.0614
.128
.128
.077
.06>t
.128
. 128
. 192
.061.
.077
.077
.064
.064
.077
.077
.077
.064
.288
. 160
.064
.064
. 160
.064
3.253
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
732
732
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
CELL B
METER
READING
420
420
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
REMARKS
Evaporation and ru
meters were operat
as of March 1st.
Runoff meter read!
a re the initial re
after testing.
Evaporation reported in Inches
PLATE H-23 E
APRIL
1972
1
2
3
;,
5
6
7
_ 8
9
10
(I
12
13
U;
15
16
17
18
IS
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0. 15
0. 15
JU5JL
0. 26
T.22
1.36
EVAP.
.064
. 128
.077
. 192
.077
. 128
.064
. 160
. 160
_.iil
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
MAY
1972
1
2
3
i)
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 '•
13
14 >
15 '
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
rOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.00
EVAP.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
.128
.256
.288
L?88
.25$
,128
.128
.166"
. 160 '
.192
.128
.160
.077T
.224
.077
.128
.077
.064
• 064
.256
.160
.160
3. 559
RUNOFF
CELLS A £ E
METER
READING
732
r !
(•
•: '
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
CELL B,
METER
READING
549
j
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
REMARKS
* Evaporation gage was
beinq repaired and
was not available for
recording on these
dates.
Evaporation reported in Inches
PLATE H-23G
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
JUNE"
1972
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
; 11
12
'3
!4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
.19
-.-
0.19
EVAP.
. 192
. 160
.128
.128
.352
.160
h . 160
. 160
.064
^.128
-256
^288:
.224
.256
.256
.224
-•131;
. 128
.192
.077
.128
.128
.256
. 160
.077
. 160
.128
.077
.256
5.287
RUNOFF
CELLS A - i E
METER
READING
732
732
TOTAL
5ALLONS
0
0
0
CELL B
METER
READING
549
..
549
TOTAL
GALLONS
._.
0
0
0
REMARKS
Fvaporation reported in Inches
PLATE H-23 H
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
JULY
1972
1
2
3
!)
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
U
14
IS
li
17
IJ
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.00
EVAP.
• 397
.160
.192
.192
.192
.077
.1(0
.160
.320
.800
.197
-51J
.768
.896
.576
.320
.224
.256
.128
.128
.1(0
.160
.064
.192
.160
.192
.320
.192
.160
.128
.224
9.111
1 RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
732
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
CELL B
METER
READING
549
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
REMARKS '
fvaporatlon reported In Inches
PLATE H-23 I
RAINFALL. EVAPORATION AMD RUNOFF
AUG.
1972
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
!
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
SEPT.
1972
1
2
3
ii
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
ill
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
NOV.
1972
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
1.33
0.01
0.56
0.70
0.34
1 .06
2.09
0.27
0.04
0. 14
6.54
EVAP.
.064
.077
.032
.000
.064
.064
.064
.288
.128
.128
.224
. 192
. 160
. 160
.192
.288
.288
.256
.128
.224
.096
. 192
.192
.128
.064
.064
.320
.224
. 160
.064
4.525
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
2221
4889
6183
6670
8350
nooo
23600
25790
25800
25800
TOTAL
GALLONS
2668
1249
532
1680
4650
10600
2190
10
0
23579
CELL B
METER
READING
5087
6500
74J8
7588
8240
10050
15S6Q
16320
16380
16380
TOTAL
GALLONS
1413
938
ISO
652
1810
5510
760
60
0
11293
REMARKS
Evaporation reported in Inches
PLATE H-23 M
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
DEC.
1972
1
2
3
'4
5
6
8
0
10
II
U
• 14
15
IS
17
18
13
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.24
0^32
0.56
' 0.03
0.50
1.83
, 0. 15
0.05
1.06
0.12
0.10
0.10
5.06
EVAP.
_-_P12_
.000
.032
.288
. 256
.192
.320
.416
.320
-J2D...
L1&
. 128
.000
.096
.096
.000
_ .032
.000
.000
.000
.256
.032
.352
.864
. 160
.064
.480
.352
.288
.736
6.432
RUNOFF
CELLS A s E
METER
READING
25800
25800
27410
-- - --
.. ZB79Q
36000
41460
41490
41490
41490
TOTAL
GALLONS
_0_
0
1610
,
lisa
7210
5460
30
0
0
15690
CELL B
METER
READING
16380
16380
16910
-US 40
19280
218S-H
21880
21880
21880
TOTAL
GALLONS
.___0
0
530
;-. 630
i
!
! •*»
1 ...2*00
0
0
0
5500
REMARKS
* Meter failed dur
this period at ri
Meter repaired.
I
i
i
rvaporat ton reported in Inches
PLATE H-23 N
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
JAN.
1973
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
!4
'5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 1
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
1 .20
1 .03
0. 22
3.07
__U1_
0.10
2.17
1.81
0.50
0.21)
0.16
0.69
0.08
0.16
14. 16
CI/AP.
.800
.224
-352
.288
.2't'i
.256
.000
.032
.061*
.064
.032
,000
.064
.192
.096
.224
. 160
.224
.416
.224
.128
. 128
. 128
.064
.288
.256
.288
.288
. 128
. 160
.244
6.036
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
41490
45870
50940
51830
71700
91800
91810
106250
1 19800
1 19800
12)890
121890
121890
122610
122610
124500
126380
126940
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
4380
5070
890
19870
20100
10
14440
13550
0
2090
0
0
720
0
1890
1880
560
85450
CELL B
METER
READING
21880
24080
26340
26780
36540
45790
45920
51960
57630
57630
58060
58060
58060
58270
58270
58560
59100
59170
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
2200
2260
440
9760
9250
130
6040
5670
0
A
430
0
0
*
210
A
0
290
540
70*
37290
REMARKS
* Cell "B" runoff
metering device rr
function. Result
questionable till
2/17/73.
Evaporation reported in Inches
PLATE H-23 0
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFT
evaporation reported in Inches
FEB .
1973
!
2
_ 3_
...L
_...Z - -
8
-5 _
__,0
1 1
' "
-£-•
15
16
l?
18
19
20
21
22
23
2k
25
26
27
28
29
30
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
QJi
0 . 4_0_
1 .04
0.35
0.32
0 .Ok
0.06
0.86
a.Z9
0.0 5-
0.22
0.59
0 . 86
0.01
0.76
0.01
0.96
1 .04
0.03
8.54
rvAF.
.,.28_8_
_., 132
...22 ',
. 320
. 192
.128
.192.
. 160
. 160
.096
22_4
.096
. 128
.288
.288
.288
.288
.381.
.256
.1(16
.5l| 4
.256
.288
1 .381*
.320
.22't
.096
.224
6.944
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
_ 126940
126950
1 36560
143150
143 _l?0
160860
160860
LJ60860
163423
.172760
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
1 0
9610
6590
40
1 7670
0
0
2563
9337
1*5820
CELL B
METER
READING
59170
-19170
62350
61)990
64990
71790
71 790
71860
73530
7.868C
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
3 1 80
261(0
0
6800
•jcrx
o""
70
1670
5150
19510
REMARKS
Ce1 I "B" runof f
metering device
malfunction. Results
questionable, till
2/17/73
PLATE H-23P
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
MARCH
1973
1
2
3
'i
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
'3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.0k
0.86
0.01
0.47
0.38
0. 18
0.56
0.32
0.58
3.40
EVAP.
.288
.352
.064
.192
.224
.256
.288
-320
.288
.096
.384
.576
.800
.736
.288
.256
.416
.120
.064
.416
.384
.384
.544
.224
.256
.288
.544
.640
.448
.032
.448
10.816
RUNOFF
1 CELLS A & I
METER
READING
176440
176440
183210
183210
184780
184780
TOTAL
GALLONS
3680
0
6770
0
1570
0
12020
CELL B
METER
READING
81030
81030
86130
86300
87710
87710
TOTAL
GALLONS
2350
0
5100
170
1410
0
9030
REMARKS
Fvaporation reported in Inches
PLATE H-23Q
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
APRI L
1973
1
2
3
4
5
6
I.....
8
9
to
11
12
M;
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.19
0. 19
F.VAP.*
, .516
t. 153
.800
. 800
.5J2
.485
_._60£
. ..._: 6_I?
.672
_,J6J
.32S.
.480
.320
.38<<
.480
.192
.640
.640
.640
.961
1 .280
.640
.640
.608
.576
.224
.288
.320
.352
.640
17.674
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
1 85780
185780
185780
185780
185780
18780
185680
TOTAL
GALLONS
1000
0
0
0
0
0
0
1000
CELL B
METER
READING
884!,:
68440
88440
88440
88440
TOTAL
GALLONS
730
0
0
0
0
0
0
730
REMARKS
'•'Evaporation reported in Inches
PLATE H-23
-------
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFF
MAY
1973
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
•3
10
11
12
13
U
'5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
21)
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTALS
RAIN-
FALL
0.07
0.01
0.08
EVAP.
. 320
.320
.38l(
.M2
.kitB
.5ltU
.736
.832
.412
1 . 152
. 800
48n
.q?6
.5l;4
.54A
.54'
.ye*
_ .^81
.416
.54*
.48C
.44E
-32C
.256
.60S
.832
.928
.92£
.480
.480
.44!
17.30'
RUNOFF
CELLS A 5 E
METER
READING
185780
1 85780
185780
185780
185780
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
0
0
0
CELL B
METER
READING
88440
88440
88440
88440
88440
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
0
0
0
REMARKS
Evaporation reported in Inches
PLATE H-23 S
RAINFALL, EVAPORATION AND RUNOFr
JUNE
1973
I
2
3
'(
5
6
Z_
8
9
!0
1)
12
'3
!':
1C
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2k
25
26
27
28
29
30
PJTALS
RAIN-
FALL
TVAP,
_-_5_li
.480
.608
.480
. 384
1.217
_!_._! 5_3
1 .856
.961
_^?6l(
^.^8.6.4
.928
.-86k
. 896
.832
.512
1.12)
1.153
1 .249]
1.217
1.376
.576
.480
.896
1 .21(9
1 .661.
1.217
.61(0
.704
.704
27.657
RUNOFF
CELLS A S E
METER
READING
1 85780
185780
185780
185780
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
0
0
0
0
CELL 8
METER
READING
881(1)0
8J440
881. 1,0
881(1(0
TOTAL
GALLONS
0
__0
0
0
0
RE
Evaporation reported in Inches
REMARKS
PLATE H-23T
-------
SETTLEMENT DATA
CELL-
MONUMENT
A-l
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
B-l
B-2
B-3
B-4
B-5
C-l
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
D-l
D-2
D-3
D-4
D-5
E-l
E-2
E-3
i E"'1
E-5
DATE
1 1-16-71
280.89
280.34
280.36
280.76
280.59
1 1-22-71
280.47
279.91
279.83
280.15
279.98
11-23-71
280.57
280.09
279.98
280.30
280.20
12-6-71
280.45
279.95
279.81
280.08
279.96
307.28
307.10
306.99
306.43
307.1 1
12-10-71
281 .27
281.14
281.15
280.70
280.85
12-14-71
307.93
307.85
307.79
307.79
307.53
O
CO
PLATE;
SETTLEMENT DATA
CELL-
MONUMENT
A-l
A-2
A- 3
A-4
A-5
B-l
B-2
B-3
B-it
B-5
C-l
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
D-l
D-2
D-3
D-4
D-5
E-l
E-2
E-3
E-'t
E-5
DATE
12-21-71
280.52
279. 94
279.88
280.23
280.03
307. 15
306.92
306.69
306.20
306.87
280.90
280.73
280.72
280.35
280.60
12-28-71
306.97
307.21
306.82
305.91
306. 16
12-30-71
280.39
279.95
279.82
280.09
280. 1 1
306.95
306. 7*
306.148
305.94
306.61
307.47
307. 44
307.26
307.40
107. 13
306.55
306.77
306.27
305.55
305.59
280.70
280.57
280.47
280.20
280.34
1-7-72
280.52
280.03
279.92
280.23
260. 1 1
306.97
306.75
306. 52
306.03
306.67
307.44
307.38
307. 19
307-33
307.06
306.51
306.76
306.27
305.57
305.64
280.94
280.83
280.76
280.47
280.70
1-14-72
280.52
280.03
279.92
280. 23
2?G . 1 1
306.97
306.75
306.51
306.02
306.66
.307.42
307.36
307.18
307.31
307.04
306. <(9
306.74
306.24
305-55
305.61
280.93
280.74
280.75
280.47
280.68
1-24-72
280.51
280.02
279.91
280. 22
280. 10
306.96
306.73
306.49
306. 01
306.65
307.40
307.34
307. 15
307.29
307.02
306.45
306.71
306.20
305.51
305.58
280.91
280.72
280.73
280.45
280.67
PLATE H-2!)B
-------
SETTLEMENT QATA
CEU-
MONUHEKT
A- 1 -;
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
Z- 1 •' .}
; 6'2: ;
: B-3 ... 5
B-4 1
•j fc--S:'j
C-2 !
t-r
C-41 1
P5,f
; b-i |
0-2 ":
i0'3 i
D-4 '
• "'
E-l
"E-2" '
• ^'>£>-3 ' '
pi(,
/-I.S ;
1-31-72
280.51
280.00
279.91
280.22
280.10
306.95
306.72
306.50
306.01
306.65
307-40
307;. 34
307.14
307.28
307.01
306.45
306.70
306 . 1 9
305.55
305.56
280.91
280.71
280.73
280.45
280.67
2-14-72
280.50
280.01
279.91
280.22
280. 10
Wss;:
306.72:
:306.4g.
!306.00;
1306.64
!307.38i
J307.3ll
J307-12
i 307. 26:
S307.00J
i
1306.42
f 306. 68
^306.17
*305-48i
JSOS.S1!
280.90
280.70
280.72
-- 280.44
280.67
DAT
3-2-72
280.52
280.03
279.91
280.23
280. 10
306.35
306. .72
306 J-48
306.4)0
306.63-
307Jj37
307. |3f
307^:11-
307^25
306 ;%9
306 J4 1
306168-
306.16
305 ,48
305.;53
280.91
280 .-71
280,72
280.45
280.67
E
3*31-72
280.49
280.01
279.90
280.22
280.09
306.93
306.71
306.47
30 5 -.99
306.62
307.35
307.28
307.09
J07.22
306.96
306.39
366.66
306 . 1 3
305. 45
305.51
2*0 . 89
280.6?
280.70
280.43
'280.65
4-28-72
280.50
280.02
279.91
' 280.22
280. 10
306.93,
306.71
306 . 46:
305.98,
306.61
3 07.33 =
', 307.06
S 307.21
'. 306. g J.
306.37..
i 306.65
306.11
; 305.43
305.49
2«0.89
280.68
280.71
'' 280.44
280,65
6-1-72
280.50
280.02
279.89
280.21
280. 10
306,. 9 3
306!. 70
306!. 46
- 3B5.98
306.6!
307;. 32
-307.24
. 3P7.05
307:. 19
3*6.90
;• 306>36
306.64
306. 11
: J05.42
305.48
280.88
280.65
280.71
280.44^
280.64
ro
O
PLATE H-24 C
SETTLEMENT DATA
CELL-
MONUMENT
A-l
; A-2 ' '
A-3
A-4
A-5
G-l
E-2 .
6-3 ...
B-4
B-5 :
c-' ;
C-2 .
C-3
04 ;
; c-5
D-l
0-2
, D-3
0-4
0-5 :
E-)
E-2
JE-3
E-4
• :v. E-5 ; •
8-17-72
280.48
280.01
279.89
280.21
280.09
306.89
306.67
306.41
305.95
306.57
307.28
307. 19
3§6 ..98
307.14
.306.84
306.31 '
306.59
3Q6.03
305.36
305,39
280.86
280.61
280.67
280.42
2,80.61
JO- 13-72
280.48
279.99
279.88
280.20
280.08
306.88
306.66 i
306.40 :
305.94 '
306.56" <
307.25 .
307.15.
306.95 :
307. 11 '
306:80 ^
306^28 ;
306. 56 -
305-99
305.33
305.36
280.85
280.60
280.66
280.41- -
280,60
DAT
1 1-20-72
280.46
279.98
279-86
280. 18
280.06
'- 306.86
306.64
306.40
305.93
•306'. 55
307.23
307. 12
306.93
307.10
: 306.77
'"'306.26
306.54
305.97
305.31
305.33
280.83
280.58
280.65
- -280.39
28ff.58
E
1-3-73
280.46
279.97
279.86
280. 18
280.06
306.86
306.64
306.39
305.93
306.55
307.23
307.11
306.91
307.08
306.76
306.25
306.53
305.95
305-30
305.31
280.82
280.57 ;
280.64
280.39
280.58
4-4-73
280.45
279.97
279-86
280. 17
280.06
306.85
306.63
306. 38
305.92
306.54
307.22
307- 10
306.90
307-07
306.75
306.24
306.51
305-94
305.29
305.29
280.81
280.56
280.63
280.37
280.57
7-3-73
280.45
279.96
279.85
280. 17
280.06
306.84
306.63
306.37
305.92
306,53
307.21
307.09
306.89
307.07
306.74
306.24
306.50
305.92
305.28
305.24
280.80
280.54
280.62
280.37
280.56
PLATE H-24 6
-------
•r;:
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
FLUID ROUT IMG CELL "C"
Date
1971
12-30
12-31
1972
1-*
1-5
1-7
1-10
l-ll
1-12
1-13
1-1*
1-17
i-i a
1-19
1-20
1-21
1-2*
1-25
1-26
Leae
Start
5.8
6.5
7.8
7.9
7.9
8.5
8.6
a.a
8.8
9.0
9.0
9.*
9,5
9.6
10. 1
12.*
28.*
33.2
*0.3
hate Cc
End
(In)
s
llectl
Total
(In)
-
Leachate This .Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
pn
Total
(Gal)
2000*
2000
0
2000
Distribution
Start
(In)
68.1
73.5
73.5
73.5
73.3
73.2
73.5
68.0
73.5
73.5
T3.5
7*. 3
72.7
72.fr
73.2
83.5
73.8
72.3
73.3
End
(In)
I.P
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total
(in)
67.1
72.5
72.5
78.5
72.3
72 . 2
72.5
67.0
72.5
72.5
72.5
73 . 3
72.7
72.6
73.2
83.5
73.8
72.3
73.3
?n!sr^eiion
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
(Gal
1*933*
803.2
868.*
868.*
868.*
865.*
865.*
868.*
802.5
868.*
868.*
868.*
877.*
870.5
869.0
876.2
999.5
883.*
865.*
877.*
31*67
0
31*67
Fluid
Ret. In
Refuse
12933
*8,000 gallons applied by water truck during refuse placement.
6,993 "gallons applied by 2.27"total rainfall during refuse
placement operation.
PLATE H-25A
Date
1972
1-27
1-28
'-31
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-*
2-7
2-8
2-9
2-10
2-11
2-12
2-13
2-1*
2-15
2-16
2-17
2-18
2-19
L»e
Start
(In)
*9.*
60.6
39.5
9.*
19.5
31.1
W-j-Z
3*. 8
11.0
22.8
3*.0
35.1
*5.6
.25. 'I
39.3
53.1
1*.*
3*. 3
58.3
32.*
hate Ce
End
(In)
1.0
1.0
-1 .*
2.0
2*.l
22.7
1.0
I.*
6.0
llectl
Total
(In)
59.6
38.5
*0.8
32.8
9-9
12.*
**.6
51.7
52.3
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
.Total Leachate
an
Total
(Gal)
713.*
*60.8
*88.*
392.6
118.5
271.7
533.9
618.8
626.0
*22*
2000
622*
Distribution
Start
Mn).
72.8
7*.J
72.5
73-0
71.5
00.0
00.0
71.*
72.2
72.*
72.5
72.9
1.0
1.0
72.5
72.*
72.2
72.5
72.5
72.4
En*
(»*J
'
o.a
o.a
6.7
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
o.a
1.0
1.5
1 .6
1.0
1.0
1.0-
I.*
1.2
i.a
1.07
I . *v
1.0
Total
(In)
*." "
72.8
7*. 3
65.8
73-0
71.5
00.0
00.0
71.*
71.2
70.9
70.9
71.9
00.0
60.0
71 •?
71.2
71.2
71.5
71.1
71.6
?n?srSn1e'eiX")
Distribution
Prior She.*£
Total Distribution
Total
(Gal
871.*
889.3
787.6
873.8
855.9
000.0
000.0
as*. 7
852.3
8*8.7
8*8.7
860.6
900.0
900.0
855.9
852.3
852.3
855. 9
851.1
857. 1
13668
31*67
*5135
Fluid
Ret. In
Refuse
29625
3005*
32082
31690
3*127
3*70*
35031
35268
. 37202
PLATE H-25
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
Date
1972
2-20
2-2!
2-22
2-23
2-24
2-25
2-26,
2-27
2-28
2-29
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5
3-6
3-7
3-8
3-9
3-10
3-1 1
Leac
Start
(In)
60. 3
33.2
62.2
31.1
67.5
24.0
5*. 7
30.3
64.5
48.2
37.8
42.9
44. 1
45.5
40.7
42.3
45.0
44.3
47-9
46.8
49. 1
hate Collection
End
(In)
5.0
1 .0
1 .0
4.0
6.0
1 .6
5.0
6.0
6.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
6.0
5.0
5.0
5. 1
Total
(In)
55.3
61.2
66.5
50.7
58.5
47.2
32.8
36.9
38.1
40.5
35-7
37.3
40.0
38.3
42.9
41.8
44. 1
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)
661 .9
732.6
796.0
606.9
700.2
564.9
392.6
441 .7
456. 1
484.8
427.3
446.5
478.8
458.5
513.5
500.3
527.9
9191
6224
15415
D i s t r i but i on
Start
(In)
72.8
72.5
73.2
72.8
72.3
72.9
72.3
72.5
72.3
74.5
72.5
72.5
72.7
72.7
72.7
72.9
72.6
72.8
72.9
72.9
72.8
End
(In)
1 .0
1 .0
4.3
13.3
28.2
1 .0
1 .0
3.0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
2.0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
Total
(In)
71.8
71 .5
68.9
59.5
44. 1
71 .9
71 .3
69.5
71.3
73.5
71 .5
71 .5
71 .7
71 .7
71-7
70.9
71 .6
71.8
71.9
71.9
D i s t ribut i on
This SKeet
Distribution
Prior Sh«Pt
Total Distribution
Total
(Gal
859.4
855.9
824.7
712.2
527.9
860.6
853.5
831 .9
853.5
679.8
855-9
855.9
858.2
858.2
858.2
848.7
857. 1
359.4
860.6
860.6
16632
45135
61767
Fluid
Ret. In
Refuse
38249
39231
39972
40754
41739
42028
42515
42929
43329
43702
44133
44545
44915
45313
45659
46020
46352
PLATE H-25 C
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
Date
1972
3-12
3- 13
3-14
3- 15
3-16
Leachate Collection
Start
(In)
46.6
45.3
49.6
51.4
61.7
End
(In)
5. 0
4.0
5 .0
5.0
6.4
Total
(In)
41.6
41.3
44. 6
46 . 4
55. 3
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)
497.9
494. 4
533.9
555.4
661.9
2743
15415
18158
Distribution
Start
(In)
72.9
72.9
73.0
73.0
1 . 0
End
(In)
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
' 0
Total
(In)
71.8
71.9
71.9
7? .0
72 . 0
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
(Gal]
859.4
860.6
860.6
861 . 8
861 . 8
4304
61767
66071
Fluid
Ret . 1 n
Refuse
46714
47080
47407 i
47714
479 1 3
PLATE H-25 D
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
Date
3-16-72
3-17-72
3-24-72
3-26-72
3-28-72
3-30-72
4-1-72
4-5-72
4-7-72
4-10-72
4-11-72
4-14-72
4-21-72
4-28-72
5-8-72
5-1 1-72
5-17-72
5-23-72
5-31-72
6-9-72
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read i ng
000
362
3822
51 18
6293
7350
8475
1 1193
12556
14592
15391
17734
22072
27102
33540
35191
39010
42251
46622
52567
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gallons
Leachate
Generated
362
3460
1296
1175
1057
1125
2718
1363
2036
799
2343
4338
5030
6438
1651
3819
3241
4371
5945
52567
18158
70725
Distribution
Meter
Reading
000
1233
6771
8366
9881
1 1810
13412
16692
19264
21901
23438
26352
33368
40303
49330
51477
56302
60010
64931
71820
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Total Gallons
Distributed
1233
5538
1595
1515
1929
1602
3280
2572
2637
1537
2914
7016
6935
9027
2147
4825
3708
4921
6889
71820
66071
137891
Fluid
Retained
in
Refuse
48784
50862
51161
51501
52373
52850
53412
54621
55222
55960
56531
59209
61 114
63703
64199
65205
65672
66222
67166
Plate H-25 E
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
Dale
6-16-72
6-23-72
6-29-72
7-3-72
7-10-72
7-18-72
7-25-72
8-1-72
8-9-72
8-14-72
8-22-72
8-30-72
9-5-72
9-18-72
9-27-72
10-3-72
10-10-72
10-19-72
1 1-7-72
1 1-16-72
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read i ng
56288
59299
60956
63070
66970
71700
76070
80164
84360
87394
92050
94164
94164
101230
106400
1 10395
1 14430
122560
135080
140590
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gal Ions
Leachate
Generated
3721
301 1
1657
2114
3900
4730
4370
4094
4196
3034
4656
2114
(3300)*
7066
5170
3995
4035
8130
12520
5510
91323
70725
162048
D i str i but ion
Meter
Reading
75667
78685
80052
83760
89020
95270
100766
106140
1 1 1880
1 15860
12 1623
126490
130740
140100
146490
151020
155790
161580
173450
178370
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Total Gallons
Distributed
3847
3018
1367
3708
5260
6250
5496
5374
5740
3980
5763
4867
4250
9360
6390
4530
4770
5790
1 1870
4920
106550
137891
244441
Fluid
.''etai'ned
in
Refuse
67292
67299
67009
67603
69963
71483
72609
73889
75433
76379
77486
80239
81 189
83483
84703
85238
85973
83633
82983
82393
Collection line broke and leachate generation data durina this
period was lost. E.stimate ^3?-0 gallons.
Plate H-25 F
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
FLUID ROUTING CELL "C"
no- -
_J . .-;
CO
;o.:
Date:
11-27-72
12-6-72
12-1 1-72
12-18-72
12-26-72
1-4-73.'
1-1U73;
1-18- 7$
;
l-2tr;73J
i ;
2-I--7J:
2 - 8>-7 3 >i
;.•
'2-V.5-.75li
: T
2-2,2-jjl
I;
3-1-7J1
|.
3-8,73;;
't
3-15-7?
3-22-7J
3-25-7:3
i
4-5-73
*,
4-12-73
... L«achate Collection
Meter
Reading
147780
: 153130
156050
157880
160990
166040
170620
175410
180095
183170
186460
189450
192160
193790
195650
200460
204130
207690
210990
215170
Leaehate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gallons
Leachate
Generated
7190
5350
2920
1830
3110
', 5050
• -, -
"< 4580:
4790'
; 4685
f-
• 3075
• ) \ •-•-_•:
! 3290
i i
j 2990
| 2710
i i
j 1636
1
i 1860
i
1 4810
• 3670
1
; 3560
'
' 3300
: 4180
74580
162048
236628
Distribution
Meter
Reading
185920
; 191030
192770
192770
196410
202900
: 208500
f 212950
: 217930
220800
1 -' :.> ' .'
5 224740
* 4 "
i 22.792»
,J ' '-
i 22,9680
| 231390
I 234110
: '.. • •
I 240040
•• 245020
250740
255940
' 261150
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total
Distribution
Tota } . Ga 1 1 ons
Distributed
7550
5110 -
•• 1 740
0
3640
t
j 6490
j
! 5600
i '•'','..-
1 4450
4980
2870
3940
31.80
1 760
• • ' ••
i 1710
' v':
i 2720
5930
1 • ''
j 4980
i 5720
1 • "• .
; 5200
1 '
! 5210
! ' • .,
82780
244441
327221
Fluid
f-.etoincd
. *in
Refuse
82753
82513
•81333
79503
80033
8147J
<
' 82493
: 82253
82548
•: 82343
8299
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL"D"
Date'
*
1971
12-30
12-31
^?^3
1-4
1-5
1-7
1-10
1-11
1-12
1-13
1-14
1-15
1-17
1-18
1-19
1-20
1-21
1-24
1-25
1-26
Leachate Collection
Start
(In)
70.0
5.6
27:5
27.6
27.9
28.5
28.8
30.0
31.8
40.0
48.8
58.8
26.2
34.4
49.7
73.4
23.4
69 .l 9
12.3
17,4
•End
(In)
1.3
1.0
1.0
I • 0
1.0
1.0
Total
(In)
56.5
72.4
22.4
68.9
11.3
16.4
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)
1500*
679.7
866.6
268.1
824.7
135.3
196.3
4471
0
4*71
Distribution
Start
(In)
56.6
70.6
73.8
73.3
72.2
73.3
72.5
72.0
72.0
72.0
71.0
56.*
71.5
71.1
71.2
71.2
76.2
69.4
62.3
70.9
?it.tri
End
(In)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
9.3
Total
(In)
56.6
70.6
73.8
73.3
72.2
73.3
72.5
72.0
72.0
72.0
71.0
56.4
71.5
71.1
71.2
70.7
75.2
68.4
53.0
lut ion
hee't
pi s t r J but ton
Prior 5nc0t
Total Distribution
Total
(Gal)
8063*
682.2
851.8
889.5
883.5
871.*
883.5
87*.*
868.4
868.4
868.4
856.3
675.9
867.2
857-3
858.7
852.6
906.9
824.9
639.2
239*8
0
23948
Fluid
Ret. In
Refuse
6563
15281
17678
18262
1834*
1903*
19*77
*8,063 gallons of rain water added during refuse placement.
1,500: gal Ions of teachate generated durlno refuse placement.
PLATE H-26 A
FLUID ROUTING CELL"D"
r r
0»t«
1972
1-27
1-28
l-3t
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-*
2-7
2-8
2-9
2-10
2-11
2-12
2-13
2-1*
2-15
2-16
2-17
2-18
2-19
Leachat* Collection
Start
(In)
27-3
33.*
81.5
16.5
22 . *
*2.8
*2.0
81.*
16.5
20.6
fcl.6
*7.6
*8.2
*7.5
31.8
*0.6
39.2
*2.6
*2.6
43.3
End
(In)
1-0
1.0
2-0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1-5
1.0
1-0
Total
(In)
26.3
32.*
79.5
15.5
21.*
*1.8
*I.O
79.*
15.5
19-6
39-6
*6.6
47.2
*6.5
30.8
39.6
38.2
*l.l
*1.6
*2,3
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Sal)
31*. 8
387.8
951.6
185.5
256.2
500.3
490,7
950 . *
185.5
23*. 6
.474.0
557.8
56*. 9
556.6
368.7
474.0
45713
492.0
497.9
506.3
1*07
4*71
13878
Distribution
Start
(In)
72.5
70.7
72.5
70.5
71.6
*5.l
*3. 1
72.3
71.*
72.9
72.8
70.2
65.3
62.*
73.0
73.1
72.1
71.1
71.2
72.6
?n?srs
End
(In)
0.0
10.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.3
2.0
II. 0
1*.8
15.3
13.5
22.0
19.3
23.3
19.7
21.1
19.0
Total
(In)
70.9
61.6
70.7
72.5
70.5
71.6
45.1
*3.l
60.0
69.*
61.9
58,0
5*. 9
51.8
*0.*
53.7
49.8
52.*
50.0
52.2
but Ion
leet
Prlor's-See?"
Total Distribution
Total
(Gal)
855.1
7*2.9
852.6
875.0
850.9
86*. 1
5**. 3
520.2
72*. 1
837.6
747.1
700.0
662.6
(25.2
487.6
648.1
601.0
632.*
603.5
630.0
1*00*
239*8
37952
Fluid
Ret. In
Refuse
20017
20372
20273
20963
21557
21921
21975
215*5
22083
22686
229S9L
23102
2JI99
23268
23387
23561
23705
238*5
23951
2*07*
PLATE H-26
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL"D"
Date
1972
2-20
2-21
2-22
2-23
2-2*
2-25
2-26
2-27
2-28
2-29
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5
3-6
3-7
3-8
3-9
3-10
Leachate Collection
Start
(In)
41.3
37.5
33.7
37.8
52.1)
«. 7
58.9
50.9
55.3
62.3
60. 5
60.8
60.8
66.5
59.9
61,0
64.5
60.7
59.7
60.7
End
(In)
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
2 .0
11.8
2.0
1 .0
1 .0
2.0
1 .0
2.0
2 .0
3.0
2.0
2.0
2 .0
1 .0
2.0
3.0
2 .0
Total
(In)
itO. 3
36.5
32.7
35.8
ItO. 6
44.7
57.9
49.9
53.3
61.3
58.5
58.8
57.8
64.5
57-9
59.0
63.5
58.7
56.7
58.7
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)
482.4
436.9
331 .4
428.5
485.9
535. 1
693.1
597.3
638.0
733.8
700.2
703.8
691 .9
772.1
690.7
706.2
760. 1
702.6
678.7
702.6
12531
13878
26409
D i s t ri but i on
Start
(In)
72.5
72.9
72.3
81.0
72.7
72.3
72.3
72.5
72.3
72. 1
72.8
72.6
72.8
72.9
72.9
72.9
73.0
72.9
72.8
73.0
Dl s tri
This S
End
(In)
21.4
23.1)
28.2
31.6
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1.0
0.0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1 .0
Tota!
(In)
51.2
49. 1
1)4.7
40. 7
80.0
71.7
71.3
71.3
71.5
71.3
71.1
71 .8
71.6
72.8
71.9
71 .9
71.9
72.0
71 .9
71.8
72.0
ju t i on
heet
Dlstr i but Ion
Prior Sheet
Total D i s t r i but i on
Total
(Gal)
617.9
592.6
539.5
49 i .2
965.5
865.3
860.5
860.5
862.9
860. 5
858. 1
866.5
864. 1
878.6
867.8
867.8
867.8
868.9
867.8
866.5'
868.9
17059
37952
5501 1
Fluid
Ret . In
Refuse
242 10
24365
24514
24576
25056
25386
25553
25817
26042
26168
26326
26489
26661
26768
26945
27106
27214
27380
27569
27733
PLATE H-26
FLUID ROUTING CELL"D'
Date
1972
3-1 1
3-12
3-13
3- H
3-15
Leachate Collection
Start
(In)
58.lt
55.0
54.8
61.1
59.6
Leach
p ump i
End
(In)
1 .0
i .0
1 .0
1 . 0
1 . 0
ite ad
i g ope i
Total
(In)
57.1*
514.0
53.8
60.1
58.6
us t me n
a t i on
Leachate This Sheet
Leachate Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total
(Gal)
687. 1
61)6.')
643.9
715. M
70 1 . 1)
t for
1506.5
"i905
26409
3131"!
Distribution
Start
(In)
73.0
72.9
73 .0
72 .9
73. 0
End
(In)
1 0
1 . 0
1 . 1
i . 0
i . 0
Total
(In)
72 . 0
71.9
72 .0
71.9
72 . 0
?i s t r i but i on
his Sheet
0 1 s t r i but i on
Prior Sheet
Tota 1 Distribution
Total
(Gal)
868.9
867. 8
868 . Q
867.8
868.9
Ii3li3
5501 1
5935
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "D"
Date
3-15-72
3-16-72
3-17-72
•3-24-72
3-26-72
3-28-72
3-30-72
4-1-72
4-5-72
4-7-72
4-10-72
4-11-72
4-14-72
4-21-72
4-28-72
5-8-72
5-11-72
5-17-72
5-23-72
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read 1 ng
1
000
889
1673
6917
8390
9921
1 1643
13352
17395
19574
22051
23133
26420
33072
42378
52260
5*547
59062
63282
Leachate
This Sheet
Leachate
Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-3)
2
889
673
5117
1290
1301
1403
1392
3765
1774
2264
833
3120
6652
8928
9882
2287
4302
3882
59754
31314
91068
Distribution (Leachate & Fresh Water)
Fresh Water Added
Meter
Reading
3
000
1000
1800
7100
8620
10240
11960
13630
17800
19787
22300
23300
26420
33450
42378
52260
54760
59400
63800
Gallons
Added
(3-D
4
1 1 1
127
183
230
319
317
278
405
213
249
167
0
378
0
0
213
338
518
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
Distribution
(4+2)
5
1000
800
5300
1520
1620
1720
1670
4170
1987
2513
1000
3120
7030
8928
9882
2500
4640
4400
63800
59354
123154
Fluid
P.eta i ned
in
Refuse
(4+6)
6
28151
28278
28461
28691
29010
29327
29605
30010
30223
30472
30639
30639
31017
31017
31017
31230
31568
32086
PLATE H-26 E
FLUID ROUTING CELL "D"
Date
5-31-72
6-9-72
6-16-72
6-23-72
6-29-72
7-3-72
7-10-72
7-18-72
7-25-72
8-1-72
8-9-72
8-14-72
8-22-72
8-30-72
9-5-72
9-18-72
9-27-72
10-3-72
Leachate Collection
Meter
Read i ng
1
69953
78027
83347
89513
95122
99470
10
6
32583
32956
33526
34081
34589
34739
34919
35422
35622
35892
36039
36371
36527
37058
37353
38593
39283
40344
42383
PLATE H-26 F
-------
FLUID ROUTING CELL "0"
Date
10-10-72
10-19-72
11-7-72
1 1-16-72
11-27-72
12-6-72
12-1 1-72
12-18-72
12-26-72
1-4-7}
1-11-73
1-18-73
1-26-73
2-1-73
2-8-73
2-15-73
2-22-73
3-1-73
3-8-73
Leachate Collection
Meter
Reading
1
181961
193070
209710
227890
249750
262910
268450
27*020
293550
314290
329580
357350
392160
418640
450770
484430
518560
551560
584850
Leachate
This Sheet
Leachate
Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-3)
2
9070
16640
15340
21860
13160
7940*
5570
19530
20740
15290
27770
34810
26480
32130
33660
34130
33000
33290
400410
200971
601381
Distribution (Leachate i Fresh Water)
Fresh Water Added
Meter
Read i ng
3
184000
193070
212550
227890
249750
262910
268450
274020
293550
314290
329580
357350
392160
418640
450770
484430
518560
551560
584850
Gallons
Added
(3-D
J»
0
2840
0
0
0
-2400*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
Distribution
(4+2)
5
9070
19480
15340
21860
13160
5540
5570
19530
20740
15290 .
27770
34810
26480
32130
33660
34130
33000
33290
400850
243354
644204
Fluid
Retained
in
Refuse
(4+6)
6
42383
45223
45223
45223
45223
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
* 2,400 gallons leachate lost on Dec. 9, 1972, due to frozen
leachate return line.
PLATE H-26G
FLUID ROUTING CELL "D"
Date
3-15-73
3-22-73
3-29-73
4-5-73
4-12-73
"1-19-73
4-26-73
5-3-73
5-10-73
5-17-73
5-24-73
5-31-73
6-7-73
6-14-73
6-21-73
6-28-73
7-5-73
7-12-73
Leachate Collection
HP ter
Read i ng
1
6 15420
61(1600
664900
684020
697580
706120
712727
718603
724792
729941
734398
740773
747340
755397
762J86
768552 .
774599
781260
Leachate
This Sheet
Leachate
Prior Sheet
Total Leachate
Total Gal.
Leachate
Generated
(1-3)
2
30570
26)80
23300.
19120
13560
8540
6607
5643
5882
4991
4028
6193
6000
7257
6571
5402
5949
5300
3890
19493
601381
796364
Distribution (Leachate 5 Fresh Water)
Fresh Wate' Added
Meter
Read i ng
3
615420
641600
664900
684020
697580
706120
712960
718910
724950-
730370
734580-
741340
748140
755815
763150
768650
775960
781890
Gal Ions
Added
(3-D
it
0
0
0
0
0
-400 *
233
307
158
429
182
567
800
418
764
98
1361
630
490
Distribution
This Sheet
Distribution
Prior Sheet
Total Distribution
Total
Distribution
(4*2)
5
30570
26180
26180
19120
13560
8540
6840
5950
6040
5420
4210
6760
6800
7675
7335
5500
7310
5930
4380
201420
644204
845624
Fluid
Reta 1 ned
i n
Refuse
(4+6)
6
42823
42823
42823
42823
42823
42423
42656
42963
43121
43550
43732
44299
45099
45517
46281
46379
47740
48370
48860
* 400 gallons leachate lost" due to equipment failure.
PLATE H-26 H
-------
APPENDIX I
Test Cell Rffuse Plactment History
218
-------
TEST CELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY
CELL A
DATE
EVENT
ADDED LIQUII RAINFALL
ll/ 5/71
11/12/71
11/13/71
11/15/71
11/15/71
11/16/71
11/17/71
11/22/71
Started Placing Refuse
Rain
Rain
Finished Placing Refuse (530.35 Tons)
Started Placing Cell Cover
Rain
Cell Cover in Place
Shot Initial Settlement Elevation
0.29"
0.25"
0.02"
Compacted Refuse ,
Density 1064 #/ydJ
219
-------
TEST CELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY
CELL B
DATE
EVENT
ADDED LIQUID
RAINFALL
11/16/71
11/19/71
11/24/71
11/29/71
12/ 1/71
12/ 2/71
12/ 3/71
12/ 6/71
12/ 6/71
12/ 7/71
12/ 8/71
12/ 9/71
12/10/71
12/10/71
Started Placing Refuse
Switched Refuse Placement to Cell E
Resumed Refuse Placement
Rain
Finished Placing Refuse (524.23 Tons)
Rain
Rain
Rain
Add Water from Water Truck
Add Water from Water Truck (69.25" in tank D as run
off from Cell B.
69.25" = 829 gallons)
Started Placing Cell Cover
Rain
Rain
Cell Cover in Place
Compacted Refuse ~
Density 1052 #/ydJ
0.96"
0.50"
0.32"
0.24"
20,000 gal.
14,000 gal*
0.27"
0.09"
*14,000 gallons should be reduced by 829 gallons to
determine total moisture added to cell
220
-------
TEST CELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY
CELL C
*
4
i •
-
DATE
Wi/fi
12/( 2^1
12/ 3/71
12/3/71
12/j 6/21 (
1. ••'"-""
124 6^1.
12/ 7/71
12/ 9/71
12/10/71
12/11/71
12/13/71
12/13/71
12/13/71
12/13/71
12/15/71
121/17/71
12/21/71
1^/21/71
12/21/71
i
EVENT
Started Placing Refuse
Rain
Rain
Switched Refuse Placement to Cell E
Rain
Resumed Placing Refuse
; *V. . L ' ' •• ; •:-.- '•' ' ., • : • „. '
Add Water from Water Truck (2,000 gal ran through
the cell and out the
tank)
Rain
Rain
Rain
Rain
Add Water from Water Truck
Finished Placing Refuse (521.72 tons)
Began Placing Muck Sand
Rain
Started Placing Distribution System
Started Placing Cell Cover
Cell Cover 1n Place
405 gal. Leachate pumped from bottom tank and
discarded
Compacted Refuse •>
Density 1064 #/ydJ
*4,000 gallons should be reduced by 2,000 gallons
to determine total, moisture added to cell.
\DDED LIQUID
4,000*
4,000 gal.
- 405 gal.
RAINFALL
0.50"
0.32"
0.24"
0.27"
0.09"
0,03"
,0.77":
0.05"
221
-------
TEST CELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY
CELLO
DATE
EVENT
ADDEDLIQUIE
RAINFALL
12/13/71
12/15/71
12/22/71
12/23/71
12/23/71
12/24/71
12/27/71
12/28/71
12/29/71
12/29/71
12/29/71
12/30/71
Started Placing Refuse
Rain
Rain
Rain
Finished Placing Refuse (530.97 Tons)
Rain
Rain - Leachate Collection Tank at bottom of Cell D
was full and overflowing. Leachate held for
recycl1 ng. Estimated vol uae, 1,500 gal.
Pea Gravel Placed for Distribution System
Rain
Distribution System Installed
Started Placing Cell Cover
Cell Cover In Place
Compacted Refuse -
Density 1065 I/yd3
- 1,500
0.05"
0.51"
0.22"
0,06"
1.77"
0.03"
222
-------
TEST CELL REFUSE PLACEMENT HISTORY
CELL E
DATE
1 1/15/71
11/16/71
1 1/16/71
1 1/16/71
1 1/17/71
1 1/S8/71
1 1/19/71
1 1/22/71
1 1/22/71
11/23/71
1 1/24/71
1 1/29/71
11/30/71
12/1/71
12/2/71
12/2/71
12/3/71
12/3/71
12/3/71
12/6/71
12/6/71
12/6/71
12/7/71
12/8/71
12/9/71
12/10/71
12/10/71
12/10/71
12/1 1/71
12/1 1/71
12/12/71
EVENT
Started Placing Refuse
Ra! n
Septic Pump i ngs
Switched Refuse Placement to Cell B (@Ton
180,2
Septic Pump ings
Septic Pump ings
Septic Pump ings
Resumed Refuse Placement
Septic Pump ings
Septic Pump ings
Switched Refuse Placement to Cell B(@ Ton
Ra in
Septic Pump ings
Septic Pump ings
Septic Pump ings
Ra i n
Rai n
Resumed Refuse Placement
Septic Pump ings
Ra i n
Septic Pump ings
Finished Placing Refuse (521.93 Tons)
Septic Pump ings
Septic P ump ings
Rain
Ra i n
Sept ic Pump ings
Started Placing Cell Cover
Ra i n
Septic Pump ings
Ce 1 1 Cover in Pi ace
Refuse Density 1047 #/yd^
<\DDED LIQUID
1 ,000 gal
)
1 ,000 Gal
800 Gal
2,200 Gal
2,200 Gal
1 ,000 Gal
2,200 Gal
2,600 gal
1 ,000 gal
1 ,000 gal
2,000 gal
3,800 gal
2, 100 gal
3,300 gal
1 ,000 gal
RAINFALL
0.02"
0.96"
0.50"
0.32"
0.24"
0.27"
0.09"
0.03"
223
-------
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 13th ed.
New York, American Public Health Association, 1971. 874 p.
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for chemical analysis
of water and wastes. Water Pollution Control Research Series. Washington,
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971. 312 p.
3. Steiner, R. L., and A. A. Fungaroli, eds. Analytical procedures for
chemical pollutants. 2d ed. Publication SWUE-12. Philadelphia,
Drexel University, 1970. 27 p.
4. Wyckoff, B. M. Rapid solids determination using glass fiber filters.
Water & Sewage Works, 111(6) -.277-280, June 1964.
*5. Mancy, K. H., and T. Jaffe. Analysis of dissolved oxygen in natural and
wastewaters. Public Health Service Publication 999-WP-37. 1966.
6. Hatch, W. R., and W. L. Ott. Determination of sub-microgram quantities
of mercury by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Analytical Chemistry,
40(14):2,085-2,087, Dec. 1968.
*7. Brandenberger, H., and H. Bader. The determination of nanogram levels of
mercury in solution by a flameless atomic absorption technique. Atomic
Absorption Newsletter, 6:101, 1967.
*8. Menzel, D. W., and N. Corwin. The measurement of total phosphorus in
seawater based on the liberation of organically bound fractions by
persulfate oxidation. Limnology and Oceanography, 10:28, 1965.
9. Sawyer, C. N., and P. L. McCarty. Chemistry for sanitary engineers.
2d ed. New York, McGraww-Hill, 1967. 518 p.
10. Fishman, M. J., and S. C. Downs. Methods for analysis of selected metals
in water by atomic absorption. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Supply
Paper 1540-C. Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966. 45 p.
11. Mancy, K. H. Instrumental analysis for water pollution control. Ann
Arbor, Mich., Ann Arbor Science Publications, 1971. 343 p.
12. Skoog, D. A., and D. M. West. Fundamentals of analytic chemistry. 2d ed.
New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1969.
13. Lingane, J. J. Electroanalytical chemistry. 2d ed. New York, Interscience
Publishers, Inc., 1958. 669 p.
*A11 references except those marked with an asterisk have been verified
by the Office of Solid Waste Management Programs.
Va959
224
------- |