EPA REGION VII IRC
                                            085841

                                      907976002
                  EPA-7-IA-Salix-Woodbury-NSDP-77-004
                  FEIS-004
                  NPDES Permit Number:  IA0061859
                  January 1977
                FINAL

   ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

                for

 PROPOSED STEAM ELECTRIC POWER PLANT
 GEORGE MEAL STEAM ELECTRIC STATION
            NEAL UNIT #4
    PORT NEAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
    SALIX, WOODBURY COUNTY, IOWA
             prepared by

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

             REGION VII

       KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI



         in conjunction with

     U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT
            OMAHA, NEBRASKA
                  and
RURAL ELECTRIFICATION ADMINISTRATION
          WASHINGTON, D.C.

       with the assistance  of

        Envirosphere Company
 A Division of Ebasco Services,  Inc.
         New York, New York

                  Approved  by:
C



                  i ._
                  Charles  V.  Wright
                  Acting Regional  Administrator

-------

-------
                    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
                GEORGE NEAL STEAM ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION
                                 NEAL UNIT 4

                              TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS	i
LIST OF TABLES	ix
LIST OF EXHIBITS	xv
SUMMARY	xix
                          CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION

A.   PURPOSE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT	1-1
B.   PRINCIPAL OWNERS OF THE PROPOSED NEAL UNIT 4	1-6
      1.  Iowa Public Service Company 	  1-6
      2.  Interstate Power Company	1-6
      3.  Northwest Iowa Power Cooperative	1-6
      4.  Northwestern Public Service Company 	  1-8
      5.  Corn Belt Power Cooperative	1-8
C.  NEED FOR POWER.	1-9
      1.  Regional Supply and Demand	1-9
          a.  Mid-Continent Area Reliability Coordination
                Agreement (MARCA) Region	1-9
                i.  System Adjusted Net Capability	1-9
               ii.  Total Firm Capacity Obligation	1-9
              iii.  System Deficiency 	  1-12
          b.  Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) Region 	  1-12
                i.  System Adjusted Net Capability	1-12
               ii.  Total Firm Capacity Obligation	1-15
              iii.  System Deficiency 	  1-15
      2.  Iowa Public Service Company - Supply and Demand 	  1-15
          a.  System Adjusted Net Capability	1-15
          b.  Total Firm Capacity Obligation	1-15
          c.  System Deficiency	1-19
      3.  Other Major Neal 4 Owners	1-19
          a.  Interstate Power Company (ISP)	1-19
          b.  Northwest Iowa Power Cooperative (NIPCO)	1-19
          c.  Northwestern Public Service Company (NPS) 	  1-19
          d.  Corn Belt Power Cooperative	1-19
      4.  Summary	1-19

-------
                   CHAPTER II - DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

A.  THE EXISTING PLANT - UNITS 1, 2 AND 3	II-l
     1.  General	II-l
     2.  Circulating Water System	II-l
     3.  Air Quality Control System	, . II-3
     4.  Boiler Stacks	II-5
     5.  Chemical Waste System	 . II-7
     6.  Water Treatment System	II-7
     7.  Ash Handling System 	 ..... II-8
     8.  Transmission Facilities	 . H-8
B.  THE PROPOSED PLANT	 11-10
     1.  General	11-10
     2.  Circulating Water System	 II-10
         a.  Intake Structure	 11-14
               i.  Traveling Screens	, . 11-14
              ii.  Desanding Units	11-14
         b. Discharge Structure	,	11-16
     3.  Fuel Handling System	11-16
     4.  Air Quality Control System	11-16
         a.  Fuel Characteristics	11-16
         b.  Combustion Reaction	11-17
         c.  Electrostatic Precipitator	,	11-26
         d.  Boiler Stack	 11-26
     5,  Water Pretreatment System 	 .,.,.. 11-29
     6.  Detnineralizer System	11-29
     7.  Potable Water System	 11-29
     8.  Wastewater Characterization 	 ........... 11-30
         a.  Main Condenser Cooling Water Discharge. „.,....,., 11-30
         b.  Auxiliary Cooling Water 	  	 11-30
         c,  Demineralizer Regeneration Wastewater ,„,.,..,,,« 11-30
         d.  Water Pretreatment and Potable Water Treatment Wastes  , , . 11-31
         e.  Boiler Slowdown and Boiler Dralndown	,	11-31
         £.  Boiler Cleaning Wastes	 . , 11-31
         g.  Powdex Backwash , 	  ,.,,,,. 11-32
         h.  Air Preheater Cleaning Wastes , 	  ,,.,..,,, 11-32
         i.  Plant Floor Drains and Miscellaneous Wastewaters. ,  ,  . . , 11-32
         j.  Ash Systems Emergency Discharge ,,,,.,,,.».,.. 11-32
         'i.  Sanitary Wastewater	,,,,,.,.»... 11-33
         1.  Ceal Pile Runoff	 11-33
     9,  Wastewater Treatment Systems,  ,,,..,....,...,,. 11-33
         a,  Demineraliigir Regentrant Wastes Neutralisation, ...... 11-35
         b.  Treatment of Oily Wastes - Floor Drainage ......... 11-35
         e.  Treatment of Metal Cleaning Wastswatey.	 « 11-38
         d.  Treatment of Non-Metal Contaminated Wastes,  ........ 11-38
         t.  Treatment of Sanitary Waitewafcer.  , ,  . .  	  ,  .  . , 11-38
         f.  Treatment of Coal Pile Runoff ............... 11-39
    10,  Solid Wast* Di»po§«l Aret ,	,  ,  .  . . 11-39
    11.  franiffliggien FseiHtJ,«B	11-39
    12,  fermit;§	11-AO
                                      li

-------
                    CHAPTER III - ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
                            WITHOUT THE PROJECT

A.  GEOLOGY
     ]^  Geomorphology	t	III-l
     2.  Bedrock	III-l
     3.  Mineral  Resources	III-4
     4.  Seismology	III-4
B.  HYDROLOGY	III-6
     1.  Surface Water	III-6
         a.  Monthly River Flows	III-7
         b.  Low Flow Conditions	III-7
         c.  Monthly River Temperatures	111-12
     2.  Ground Water	111-12
     3.  Water Usage 	 111-15
C.  WATER QUALITY AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY	111-19
     1.  Overview	111-19
     2.  Site Specific Ecological Data 	 111-22
         a.  Water Quality 	 111-24
               i.  Existing Water Quality - Neal Unit 4	111-27
              ii.  Summary .  .	111-36
         b.  Algae	111-36
         c.  Macrophytes 	 Ill-40
         d.  Zooplankton 	 111-40
         e.  Macroinvertebrates	111-41
               i.  Drift 	 111-41
              ii.  Artificial Substrates 	 111-41
         f.  Fish	111-45
         g.  Trophic Relationships  	 111-59
         h.  Rare and Endangered Species 	 111-59
D.  METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY	 111-60
     1.  Temperature 	 	 Ill-60
     2.  Precipitation  	 111-63
     3.  Drought  	 111-63
     4.  Snowfall	111-63
     5.  Severe Weather	111-66
     6.  Winds  	 111-66
     7.  Visibility and Fog	 111-73
     8.  Diffusion Climatology 	 111-73
E.  BACKGROUND  AMBIENT AIR QUALITY  	 111-81
     1.  Particulate Concentrations	111-81
     2.  Sulfur Dioxide Concentrations  	 111-84
     3.  Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations ...    	 111-84
     4.  Emission Inventory Data 	 111-84
F.  TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY	111-87
     1.  Vegetation	111-87
         a.  Potential Natural  Vegetation of Woodbury
               and Dakota Counties  	 111-87
                                     iii

-------
         b.  Existing Local Natural Vegetation 	  111-87
               i.  Cottonwood.	111-90
              ii.  Open Cottonwood	111-90
             iii.  Mixed Cottonwood	111-90
              iv.  Willow-Elm-Cottonwood 	  	  111-90
               v.  Basswood-Oak	„	111-90
              vi.  Bur Oak-Elm	111-90
             vii.  Open Shrub	  .  IH-93
            viii.  Riparian Shrub	IH-93
              ix.  Browns Lake Meadow	  HI-93
               x.  Sand Dune	IH-93
     2.  Wildlife	111-93
         a.  Rare, Endangered or Threatened Species	111-93
         b.  Tall-grass Prairie Community	111-95
         c.  Riparian Community	  IH-95
     3.  Existing Stresses on Terrestrial Communities	111-98
G.  HISTORIC, SCENIC AND RECREATIONAL SITES	III-lOO
     1.  Historical Background of the Site Area	III-lOO
         a.  The Creation of Nearby Oxbow Lakes	III-lOO
         b.  Irregularity of the State Boundary	,  Hi-101
         c.  Difficulty in Identification of Past Sites.  .,,,.,.,  HI-101
     2,  Historic and Archeologic Sites. 	 ,  .  III-1Q1
     3.  Existing Parks and Recreation Areas	,  ,  HI-103
         a.  Stone State Park	111-103
         b.  Lewis and Clark State Park	,	III-105
         c.  Omadi Bend State Park	III-105
         d.  Browns Lake (Bigelow Park)	,	HI-105
         e.  Snyder Bend County Park	,  HI-105
         f.  Winnebago Bend State Park  and Management Area	  HI-105
     4.  Status of Proposals for Snyder-Winnebago Bends
           Recreation Areas	,  . ,  ,  HI-106
H,  LAND AND TRANSPORTATION	III-108
     1.  General Existing Land Use 	  111-108
     2.  Agricultural	III-108
     3.  Industrial	  1H-112
     4,  Commercial	III-H2
     5,  Public and Semipublic 	  111-113
     6.  Residential 	  111-113
     7.  Urban 	  111-113
     8,  Transportation	,  HI-113
I.  DEMOGRAPHY	  111-115
     1.  Population History	111-115
     2,  Current Demographic Characteristics ,,..,..,,,,,.,  Hl-115
     3.  Population Projections	111-125
J.  SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS	  111-126
     1.  Education 	  111-126
     2.  Residential Moves	  ,  111-126
     3.  Housing Characteristics .....  	 ....  111-129
     4.  Economy 	  111-129
     5,  Occupation Characteristics, Incomes and Commutation ,«..,.  111-133
                                      iv

-------
         CHAPTER IV - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT

A.  CONSTRUCTION	IV-1
     1.  Impact on Local Socio-Economics 	   IV-1
         a.  Employment and Labor Force  	   IV-2
         b.  Housing and Relocation	IV-2
         c.  Other Economic Factors  	   IV-2
         d.  Community Facilities and Services 	   IV-2
     2.  Impact on Land Use and Aesthetics	IV-3
     3.  Impact on Water	IV-5
     4.  Impact on Land	IV-6
         a.  Effects on Biological Communities of Site Area	IV-6
             i.  Removal of Vegetation	IV-6
            ii.  Construction Activities 	   IV-8
         b.  Effects on Regional Terrestrial Ecosystem 	   IV-8
         c.  Effects on Soils	IV-9
     5.  Impact on Aquatic Ecology 	   IV-9
     6.  Impact on Air Quality	IV-10
B.  CIRCULATING WATER SYSTEM 	   IV-12
     1.  Intake System	„	IV-12
         a.  Effects on Aquatic Ecology  	   IV-12
             i.  Condenser Entrainment 	   IV-12
            ii.  Impingement	IV-23
         b.  Effect on Other Water Uses	IV-32
     2.  Discharge System  	   IV-32
         a.  Effects on Missouri River Temperature Distribution  ....   IV-32
             i.  State Thermal Discharge Criteria  	   IV-33
            ii.  Federal Thermal Discharge Regulations 	   IV-34
           iii.  Thermal Prediction Model  	   IV-34
            iv.  Temperature Rise Predictions  	   IV-35
             v.  Results of the Thermal Analysis	IV-41
         b.  Effects on Other Water Quality Parameters 	   IV-41
         c.  Effects on Aquatic Ecology  .  „	IV-41
         d.  Effects on Other Water Users  	   IV-47
C.  ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS  	   IV-48
    1.    Description of Basic Predictive Methodology 	   IV-48
    2.    Federal Regulations 	   IV-53
    3.    Emission Rates	IV-53
    4.    Ambient Air Quality	   IV-56
         a.  Sulfur Dioxide Concentrations 	   IV-56
         b.  Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations 	   IV-59
         c.  Particulate Concentrations  	   IV-59
         d.  Sulfuric Acid Concentrations  	   IV-62
    5.    Effects on Terrestrial Biota  	   IV-63
         a.  Effects on Terrestrial Vegetation 	  ....   IV-63
             i.  Effects of Sulfur Dioxide on Terrestrial Vegetation .  .   IV-63
            ii.  Effects of Acid Rain and Sulfate Deposition
                   on Vegetation	   IV-67
           iii.  Effects of Nitrogen Dioxide on Vegetation 	   IV-67
            iv.  Effects of Particulate Matter on Vegetation 	   IV-68
         b.  Effects on Terrestrial Wildlife 	   IV-69
             i.  Effects of Sulfur Dioxide on Wildlife 	   IV-69
            ii.  Effects of Sulfuric Acid Mist on Wildlife	IV-69
           iii.  Effects of Nitrogen Dioxide on Wildlife 	   IV-71

-------
         b.  Off-Site Disposal	V- 45
    8.   Lining of Major Storage Areas	V- 45       *
         a.  Coal Storage Area	V- 45
         b.  Coal Runoff Holding Pond	V- 46
         Co  Solid Waste Disposal Area	V- 46
    9.   Fuel Supply	V- 46
D.  ALTERNATIVES TO NORMAL MODE OF OPERATION FOR MINIMIZING
      ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 	   V- 48

        CHAPTER VI - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USES OF
                  MAN'S  ENVIRONMENT AND  THE MAINTENANCE
                AND ENHANCEMENT  OF LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY

A.  INTRODUCTION	VI-1
B.  SHORT-TERM USES	VI-1
    1.   Beneficial Impacts  	  VI-1
    2.   Adverse Impacts which cannot be Avoided 	  VI-2
         a.  Water Quality	VI-2
         b.  Water Quality	VI-2
         c.  Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat 	  VI-2
         d.  Aquatic Ecology	VI-2
         e.  Land	VI-3
C.  LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY	VI-4

   CHAPTER VII - IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF RESOURCES

A.  GENERAL  	 .....  VII-1       ^
B.  FUEL	VII-1         J
C,  LAND USE	VII-1
    1.   Power Plant Site	VII-1
    2.   Coal Mining Area, Wyoming	VII-1
    3.   Other	VII-1
D.  WATER	VII-2
E.  CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS	VII-2
F.  LABOR AND MANPOWER	VII-2

                  CHAPTER VIII - COORDINATION WITH OTHERS

A.  CONTACTS MADE BY APPLICANT 	 VIII-1
B.  MEETING WITH ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS  	 VIII-3
C.  PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING 	 VIII-4

                   CHAPTER IX  -  .WRITTEN COMMENTS RECEIVED AND
                               ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RESPONSES
GLOSSARY	G-l
REFERENCES	R'1
                                    Vlll

-------
                           LIST OF TABLES
                             CHAPTER I
                                                                     Page
 I-A-1   Owners of Neal Unit 4	    1-3
 I-C-1   Members of Mid-Continent Area
           Power Pool                  	    1-13
 I-C-2   Net Generating Capabilities of
           Power Plants Owned by
           Iowa Public Service Company 	    1-16
 I-C-3   Energy Sales by Iowa Public
           Service Company in 1975     	    1-18
                             CHAPTER II

II-A-1   Typical Characteristics of Coal
           Used at Units 1, 2 and 3      	    II-4
II-A-2   Maximum Emissions from Units
           1, 2 and 3 at Full Capacity
           Operation                     	    II-6
II-B-1   Characteristics of Western Coal
           to be Used at Neal Unit 4     	    11-18
II-B-2   Characteristics of Typical
           Western Coal	    11-19
II-B-3   Ash Constituents of Typical
           Western Coal                  	    11-20
II-B-4   Coal Supply Location Description  	    11-22
II-B-5   Trace Elements Found in Coal
           Samples North Knobs Area,
           Wyoming (ppm)                   	    11-24
II-B-6   Average Concentrations of Trace
           Elements in Typical Western
           Coal (ppm)                      	    11-25
II-B-7   Maximum Emissions Calculated for
           Neal Unit 4 and Total Station
           at Full Capacity Operation      	    11-28
II-B-8   Unit 4 Wastewater Flows           	    11-37
II-B-9   Permits Required                  	    11-42
                                  ix

-------
                            CHAPTER III
III-A-l    Soil Properties  in the Area
             of the Neal Site           	    III-3
III-A-2    Seismology in the Area of the
             Neal Site                  	    III-5
III-B-1    Missouri River Flow Rates    	    III-8
III-B-2    Comparison of Predicted and
             Measured Average Monthly
             River Flows                	    III-9
III-B-3    Missouri River Ambient
             Temperatures               	    111-14
III-B-4    Water Use and Waste Water
             Treatment and  Disposal
             in the Neal Unit 4 Area    	    111-17
III-C-1    Commercial Landings in Iowa
             Boundary Waters of the
             Missouri River (1972-1975)  	    111-23
III-C-2    A Comparison of  Water
             Quality at Stations 1 and  8	    111-28
III-C-3    Summary of Water Quality at
             Station 1                  	    111-29
III-C-4    Monthly Bacterial Counts
             at Station 1               	    111-37
III-C-5    Thermal Profiles, Sampling
             Sites (OF) - July 12, 1973	    111-46
III-C-6    Common and Scientific Names
             of Fish Collected in the Port
             Neal Area of the Missouri
             River and its  Backwaters,
             1971-1974                  	    111-47
III-C-7    Summary of Missouri River
             Trammel and Gill Net Data,
             1971-1975                  	    111-51
IJI-C-8    Synopsis of Electrofishing
             Results Above  and Below
             George Neal Units 1 & 2
             (Catch Per 1000 ft Shocked)	    111-54
III-C-9    Larval Fish Survey; Summer 1974  	    111-56
III-C-10   Larval Fish Survey, Summer 1975  	    111-57
III-D-1    Average and Extreme Dry Bulb
             Temperatures Sioux City,
             Iowa (1931-1960)           	    111-61
III-D-2    Specific Frequency of Monthly
             and Seasonal Wet Bulb
             Temperatures (F) Sioux City,
             Iowa (1959-1964)           	,.  .    111-62
                                  x

-------
                                                                     Page

III-D-3    Average and Monthly Extreme
             Precipitation (inches
             Sioux City, Iowa (1931-1960)        	   111-64
III-D-4    Maximum Short Period Rainfall
             Sioux City, Iowa                    	111-65
III-D-5    Average and Extreme Snowfall Data
             Sioux City, Iowa, (1931-1960)       	   111-67
III-D-6    Severe Weather Precipitation
             Sioux City - Des Moines, Iowa       	111-68
III-D-7    Maximum Monthly Extreme Mile Windspeed
             Sioux City, Iowa                    	111-70
III-D-8    Recurrence Intervals of Extreme Mile
             Windspeeds Sioux City, Iowa         	   111-71
III-D-9    Maximum Persistence of Wind
             Direction Sioux City, Iowa
             (1959-1964)                         	   111-72
III-D-10   Percent Frequency of Restricted
             Visibilities and Fog Des
             Moines - Sioux City, Iowa           	   111-74
III-D-11   Relation of Pasquill Stability
             to Weather Conditions and
             Relation of Turner Stability
             Class to Pasquill Stability         	   111-75
III-D-12   Seasonal Distribution of Stability
             Classes Sioux City, Iowa (1959-
             1964)                               	111-76
III-D-13   Percent Frequency of Stabilitu Class
             by Wind Direction and Coincident
             Wind Speed                          	   111-78
III-D-14   Percent Frequency of Inversions
             Omaha, Nebraska (1955-1957)         	   111-79
III-E-1    Air Quality Monitoring System
             High Volume Sampler Data            	   111-82
III-E-2    Total Suspended Particulates,
             City-South Sioux City, County-
             Dakota, Location-City Office        	   111-83
III-E-3    S02 Bubbler, City-South Sioux City,
             County-Dakota, Location-City Offices	111-84
III-E-4    Background Air Quality Summary        	   111-86
III-F-1    Latin Names of Plant Species
             Cited in Text                       	„   111-88
III-F-2    Bird Species of Audubon Blue List II
             Found in Iowa-Nebraska Floodplain   	   111-94
III-F-3    Mammalian Species of the Central
             Tall Grass Prairie Community        	   111-96
III-F-4    Densities of Important Vertebrates of
             Snyder Bend and Browns Lake Parks
             Area                                	111-97
                                 XI

-------
III-F-5    Reptilian and Amphibian
             Species with Ranges
             Including Port Neal Area	    111-99
III-H-1    Existing Land Use Within
             the Neal Site Area               .  .  .	    111-110
III-H-2    Existing Land Use in the Pour
             County Region, and Woodbury
             County, Iowa                     	    III-lll
III-I-l    Woodbury County Populstion
             Trend                            	    III-116
III-I-2    Urban and Rural Population Changes
             in Woodbury County,
             1930-1970                        	    III-117
III-I-3    Past and Projected Population
             (Counties Within 10
             miles of the Neal Site           	    III-118
III-1-4    Population of Woodbury County
             Subdivisions, 1960 and
             1970                             	    III-122
III-I-5    Components of Population Change in
             Woodbury County, 1960 to
             1970                             	    III-123
III-I-6    Selected Demographic Characteristics,
             1970 (Counties Within 10
             Miles of the Neal Site)          	    III-124
III-J-1    Woodbury County Educational
             Attainment                       	    III-127
III-J-2    Residential Moves, 1965 to 1970 (Counties
             Within 10 Miles of the
             Neal Site)                       	    III-128
III-J-3    Housing Characteristics, 1970 (Counties
             Within 10 Miles of the
             Neal Site)                       	    III-130
III-J-4    Moderate Forecast of Gross New
             Residential Housing and Land
             Requirements Sioux City
             Urban Area                       	    III-131
III-J-5    Employed Persons 16 Years of Age and
             Older, By Industry, 1970 (Counties
             Within 10 Miles of the
             Neal Site)                       	    III-132
III-J-6    Moderate Forecast of Total Employment
             by Industry Groupings Sioux
             City Urban Area                  	    III-134
III-J-7    Employment and Payroll, First Quarter
             1971 and 1972 (Counties Within 10
             Miles of the Neal Site)          	,  .  .  .    III-135
III-J-8    Employed Persons 16 Years of Age and
             Older, By Occupation, 1970(Counties
             Within 10 Miles of the Neal Site)	    III-136
                                       xii

-------
 III-J-9    Median Earnings  of Persons  in Experienced
              Civilian Labor Force  for  Selected
              Occupation Groups 1969.   (Counties
              Within 10 Miles of the Neal Site)	III-137
 III-J-40   Per Capita Income, 1969 and Family
              Income and Unemployment,  1970
              (Counties Within 10 Miles of the
              Neal Site)                     	   III-138
 III-K-11   Place of Work,  1970 (Counties Within  10  Miles  of
              the Neal Site)                  	III-140
 III-J-12   Moderate Population and Employment
              Forecasts, Sioux City Urban Area	T	III-141
                              CHAPTER  IV
 IV-B-1   Analysis  of Variance  on Transformed Counts
            (VX+i)   of  Total Green Algae  Enumerated
            in the  Special  Plankton Distribution
            Study, May 30,  1974	IV-15
 IV-B-2   Neal Unit  4 Design CWS  (317,400  gpm)  as  a
            function of  monthly Missouri River  Flows
            during  the period  1965 -  1972	IV-16
 IV-B-3   Composition of Fish Larvae  Found in Drift Net and
            Condenser Passage  (Entrainment)  Samples From
            May - August 1974	IV-20

 IV-B-4    Point  Estimates of Fish  Egg and  Larval
            Entrainment  Neal Units 1-4 and 4	   IV-22
 IV-B-5    Fecundities  of Selected  Species  of
           Missouri River Fish	,	   IV-24
 IV-B-6    Impingement  Data Trends, Neal Units 1 & 2,
            1974 - 1975	   iv-25
 IV-B-7    Impingement  Data, Neal Unit 3
           January, February, March 1976	   IV-27
 IV-B-8    Impingement  Data, Neal Units 1,  2 and 3
           February 22  - 28, 1976	   IV-30
 IV-C-1   Maximum Predicted SO  , NO ,  Particulate and
           H2SO, Concentrations,  Neal Units 1-4
           for Each Grid Point (ug/m )	   IV-50
 IV-C-2   National Ambient Air Quality Standards  	   IV-54
 IV-C-3   Federal Standards of Performance for New
           Stationary Sources  	   IV-55
IV-C-4   Input Parameters for Diffusion Calculations,
           Neal Units 1-4	   IV-57
IV-C-5   Summary of Maximum Predicted Ground Level
           Contaminant Concentrations (ug/m )   	   IV-58
IV-C-6   Twenty-four Hour Particulate Impact/
           Background Joint Frequency Analysis  	 ...   IV-60
                                  Xlll

-------
IV-C-7   Sensitivities to Sulfur Dioxide  of Woody  and
           Agricultural Plants  Common to  the
           Port Neal Area	   IV-64
IV-C-8   Toxilogical Effects  of S0?,  N0?  on Test
           Animals	.,	   IV-70
IV-G-1   Major Noise Sources  During Plant Construction  	
IV-G-2   Plant and Dike Construction  Equipment  Schedule   	   IV-85
IV-G-3   Major Noise Sources  During Plant Operation   	   IV-89
                              CHAPTER V

 V-C-1   Average Water Quality of the Missouri  River  in
           the Vicinity of Neal Unit  4	   V-18
 V-C-2   Monthly Average Blowdown Temperature  - Natural  Draft
           Cooling Tower  	   V-19
 V-C-3   Natural Draft Cooling Tower  Annual  Salt Deposition,
           LBS/ACRE/Year	   V-20
 V-C-4   Monthly Average Blowdown Temperature  - Mechanical
           Draft Cooling Tower	.  .   V-25
 V-C-5   Round Mechanical Draft Cooling  Tower  Annual  Salt
           Deposition, LBS/ACRE/Year   	   V-26
 V-C-6   Woody Plants Sensitive to Sodium Chloride  SaLt  Spray.  .  .   V-29
                                    xiv

-------
                       LIST OF EXHIBITS
                          CHAPTER 1
 I-A-1   Neal Unit 4 Location Map	 1-4
 I-A-2   Construction Schedule Of
           Neal Unit 4            	1-5
 I-B-1   Area Served By Iowa Public
           Service Company	1-7
 I-C-1   Mid-Continent Area Reliability
           Coordination Agreement
           Region                 	1-10
 I-C-2   Projected Total Firm Capacity
           Obligation and Adjusted Net
           Capability of Mid-Continent
           Area Reliability Coordination
           Agreement Region - 1976 to
           1985                   	1-11
 I-C-3   Projected Total Firm Capacity
           Obligation and Adjusted Net
           Capability of Mid-Continent
           Area Power Pool Members	1-14
 I-C-4   Projected Total Firm Capacity
           Obligation and Adjusted Net
           Capability of Iowa Public
           Service Company - 1976 to
           1985                   	1-17
                          CHAPTER II

II-A-1   George  Neal  Steam Electric
           Station  -  The  Existing
           Plant                  	II-2
II-A-2   The  Existing Transmission
           Lines Owned By Iowa By
           Iowa  Public Service
           Company                 	II-9
II-B-1   George  Neal  Steam Electric
           Station, The Proposed
           Plant                  	11-11
II-B-2   Proposed Water Management
           Flow  Diagram            	11-12
II-B-3   Sectional  Views  of the Unit 4
           Intake and Discharge
           Structures              	11-13
II-B-4   Traveling  Screen with Fish
           Protection System      	11-15
II-B-5   Coal Area  Ownership      	11-21
II-B-6   Cutaway View of  Neal Unit 4
           Electrostatic  Pre-
           cipitator               	11-27
II-B-7   Neat 4  Bottom Ash and
           Economizer Ash Re-
           circulating Systems	11-34

                               xv

-------
  II-B-8   Proposed Chemical Wastes Collection
            and Treatment System	11-36
  II-B-9   Transmission Routes      	11-41
                          CHAPTER III

 III-A-1  Soils Index Map          	III-2
 III-B-1  Distribution of MA7CDLF For the
            Missouri River at Sioux City,
            Iowa, 1967 - 1974      	III-ll
 III-B-2  Missouri River Ambient Temperature
            - July                 	111-13
 III-C-1  Aerial View Of The Missouri River
            At Port Neal, Iowa     	111-20
 III-C-2  Water Quality and Plankton Sampling
            Stations, July 1971-April
            1973                   	111-25
 III-C-3  Water Quality and Plankton Sampling
            Stations, May 1973 -
            Present                	111-26
 III-C-4  Semi-monthly Levels of pH at
            Station 1              	111-31
 III-C-5  Semi-monthly Levels of Dissolved
            Oxygen and Percent Saturation
            At Station 1           	111-33
 III-C-6  Semi-monthly Levels of Temperature
            At Station 1           	111-34
 III-C-7  Semi-monthly Nutrient Levels
            At Station 1           	111-35
 III-C-8  Diversity (Number of Genera)
            And Abundance (Number of
            Individuals) of Phytoplankton,
            Stations 1-8, Missouri River,
            Iowa                   	111-38
 III-C-.9   Artificial Substrate Sampler
            Stations, 1973         	111-42
 III-C-10  Monthly Median Abundance of
            Trichoptera (Caddisflies),
            Ephemeroptera (Mayflies),
            and Diptera (Midges), Over
            All Artificial Substrate
            Stations, Missouri River,
            Iowa and Nebraska      	111-43
III-C-11  Diversity (Number of Families)
            And Abundance (Number of
            Individuals) of Aquatic In-
            sects Collected On Artificial
            Substrates, Missouri River,
            Iowa                   	111-44
III-C-12  Fisheries Backwater and Shoreline
            Seining Areas (A through
            K)                     	TII-50
                                   xvi

-------
 III-D-1    Surface Wind  Rose  - Sioux City, Iowa
            Annual  (1951-1960)     	111-69
 III-F-1    Existing  Natural Foodplain Vegetation:
            Sargeant  Bluff to Winnebago
            Bend                   	111-91
 III-G-1    Regional  Recreational
            Areas                  	III-104
 III-H-1    Existing  Land Use Map    	III-109
 III-I-l    Population:  Places Within 10
            Miles of  Proposed Site 	III-119
 III-I-2    Centers of  Over 10,000 Population
            Within  100 Miles of Proposed
            Site                   	III-120
                           CHAPTER IV
 IV-A-1    Natural Vegetation of Neal
            Unit 4 Site            	IV-7
 IV-B-1    Schematic of Plankton Subsampling
            Experiment, May 30,1974	IV-14
 IV-B-2    Thermal Plume Analysis of the Unit
            4 Discharge            	IV-37
 IV-B-3    Thermal Plume Analysis of the Unit
            4 Discharge            	IV-38
 IV-B-4    Thermal Plume Analysis of the Unit
            4 Discharge            	IV-39
 IV-B-5    Thermal Plume Analysis of the Unit
            4 Discharge            	IV-40
 IV-B-6    Length-Frequency Distributions of
            Carp Taken Upstream and Downstream
            of Neal 1 and 2 by Electrofishing,
            April-May 1974         	IV-44
 IV-B-7    Length-Frequency Distributions of
            Carpsucker Taken Upstream and
            Downstream of Neal 1 and 2 by
            Electroshocking, April-May,
            1974                   	IV-45
 IV-B-9    Condition Factors of Carp and
            Carpsucker Taken Upstream and
            Downstream of Neal 1 and 2 by
            Electrofishing, April-May,
            1974                   	IV-46
IV-C-1    Locations of Grid Points for Air
            Quality Study          	IV-49
IV-F-1    Woodbury County Zoning in the Area
            of Neal Unit 4         	IV-78
                                xv 11

-------
 IV-G-1   Construction Sound Levels at a
           Distance of about 4900 ft.
           from the Plant Construction
           Center                 	IV-82
 IV-G-2   Plant Construction Sound
           Contours               	IV-86
 IV-G-3   Plant Construction Sound
           Contours               	IV-87
 IV-G-4   Plant Operation Sound
           Contours               	IV-91
                           CHAPTER V
V-B-1    Candidate Plant Sites    	V-6
V-C-1    Natural Draft Cooling Tower
           System - Neal Unit 4
           Conceptual Plot Plan   	V-15
V-C-2    Makeup Water Intake
           Platform               	V-16
V-C-3    Round Mechanical Draft Cooling
           Tower System - Neal Unit 4
           Conceptual Plot Plan   	V-23
V-C-4    pH Ranges of Surface Soils
           in Unit 4 Area         	V-27
V-C-5    Rectangular Mechanical Draft
           Cooling Tower System -
           Neal Unit 4 Conceptual
           Plot Plan              	V-31
                                xvi 11

-------
                             SUMMARY

      GEORGE NEAL UNIT 4 STEAM-ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION

               ( ) DRAFT                 (X) FINAL

Responsible Office;  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1735
Baltimore, Kansas City, Missouri 64108, telephone 816-374-2921.

1.  Type of Action;  (X) Administrative    ( ) Legislative

2.  Description of Action; Iowa Public Service Company  of  Sioux
City,  Iowa,  has  applied  for  a  new source National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System permit for the operation  of  a  576
megawatt  coal-fired  steam-electric generating facility adjacent
to the Missouri River.   The station is located  approximately  14
miles south of Sioux City, Iowa.

Pursuant  to  the  National  Environmental  Policy  Act  of  1969
(PL 91-190), EPA has prepared  this  final  Environmental  Impact
Statement   (EIS)  to evaluate the potential environmental impacts
of this action upon the Missouri River, Woodbury County, and  the
surrounding area.

This  EIS  is  a multiagency document, and will serve as the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers1 EIS on  their  possible  issuance  of  a
Section  404,  Federal  Water  Pollution  control  Act Amendments
permit and a Section 10, River and Harbor Act permit.   The  Iowa
Public  Service  Company has applied for a Department of the Army
permit under Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act  of  3  March
1899  (30  Stat  1151;  33 U.S.C. 403) and under the provisions of
Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments
of 1972 (86 Stat 816; 33 U.S.C. 1344) for activities  related  to
the   proposed  construction  of  an  intake  pumphouse,  outfall
structure, and armored riprap apron for a 576 megawatt coal-fired
steam-electric power generating facility on and in  the  Missouri
River  at  mile 716.64L  (1960 mileage).  The work will consist of
constructing a coffer cell retaining  structure,  dewatering  the
work   area,  excavating  approximately  21,800  cubic  yards  of
material, constructing the intake and outfall structures, placing
the required backfill,  repairing the bank revetment, removing the
coffer cell retaining  structure,  installing  approximately  300
linear  feet  of  sheet  piling,  and placing approximately 1,500
cubic yards of armor riprap aprons in front  of  the  intake  and
outfall structures.  The intake pumps will extract river water at
a  rate  of  approximately  707  cubic feet per second for use as
condenser coolant in the  power  generating  plant  and  will  be
returned  to  the  river  through  the  discharge structure.  The
                                xix

-------
statement  will  also  serve   as   the   EIS   for   the   Rural
Electrification  Administration's  possible  issuance  of  a loan
guarantee to Cornbelt Power and Northeast Iowa Power Cooperatives
to provide for generating  facilities  and  related  transmission
facilities.

3.  Environmental Impacts;   The   power   plant   will   convert
approximately 450 acres of agricultural land and wildlife habitat
to  industrial  use.   Combustion for pcwer generation will result
in the release of  waste  by-products  into  the  atmosphere  and
heated discharge water into the Missouri River.  Approximately 50
million tons of coal will be committed during the 30-year life of
the  facility.   The  facility  is  expected  to  provide for the
production  and  distribution  of  power  to  meet  present   and
projected demands.  The total cost of the project is estimated at
$276  million.   Liquid  discharges will be those associated with
coal pile runoff, plant wastewater treatment systems and sanitary
waste treatment systems.

Adverse Environmental Effects^ construction of the station  will,
to  varying  degrees,  disrupt  aquatic and terrestrial habitats.
Noise and dust will also  result  from  construction  activities.
Damage  or  death  of  aquatic  organisms  will result from their
impingement on the intake  structure  and  entrainment  into  the
circulating  water  systenj during plant operation.  The levels of
certain air pollutants  (e.g., sulfur  dioxide,  nitrogen  oxides,
and particulates) are expected to increase.

4.  Alternatives; Denial of permit, resulting  in  no  discharge;
alternate  plant  sites;  alternate  cooling  systems;  alternate
fuels; alternate routes of fuel transportation; alternate methods
for the treatment of stack emissions; and alternate ash  disposal
techniques.

5.  Comments Requested;

                        Federal Agencies

Council on Environmental Quality
U.S. Department of Agriculture
     Forest Service
     Soil Conservation Service
U.S. Department of Commerce
     National Marine Fisheries service
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
     Regional Administrator, Region VII
     Area Director
U.S. Department of the Interior
     Special Assistant to the Secretary
     Fish and Wildlife Service
     Bureau of Land Management
     Bureau of Mines
     Bureau of Reclamation

-------
     Bureau of Indian Affairs
     Bureau of Outdoor Recreation
     National Park Service
     Office of Land Use and Water Planning
     Geological Survey
U.S. Department of Transportation
     Federal Highway Administration
     Coast Guard
     Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Power Commission
National Bureau of Standards
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Water Resources Council
Federal Energy Administration
Missouri River Basin Commission

                        Members of Congress

Richard C. Clark, U.S. Senate
John C. Culver, U.S. Senate
Berkley Bedell, U.S. House of Representatives

                                  State

Iowa "A-95" Coordinator, Governor's Office
Nebraska HA-95" Coordinator, Governor's Office
Lyle Scheelhaase, State Representative
Donald V. Doyle, state Representative
Willis Junker, State Representative
Leonard Anderson, State Senator
E. Kevin Kelly, State Senator
Iowa Department of Environmental Quality
State Library Commission of Iowa

                        Local and Regional

Mayor, Salix, Iowa
Mayor, Sioux City, Iowa
woodbury County Conservation Board
Sioux City Public Library

              Interested Groups and Individuals

People's Energy Project
Wildlife Society, Iowa Chapter
American Fisheries Society, Iowa Chapter
Audubon society of Iowa
Sierra Club, Sioux City Chapter
Citizens for Environmental Action
Citizens United for Responsible Energy
Iowa Association of Municipal Utilities
J.N. "Ding" Darling Foundation, Inc.
Izaak Walton League, Sioux City Chapter
Keep Earth's Environment Pure
                                 xxi

-------
Nature Conservancy, Iowa Chapter
State Preserves Board
Ducks Unlimited
Iowa wildlife Federation
Iowa Commercial Fisheries Association
Iowa Ornithologists' Union
Iowa Citizens for Environmental Quality

6.  The draft Environmental Impact Statement was
sent to council on Environmental Quality in October 1976,

7.  The final Environmental Impact Statement was sent
to Council on Environmental Quality in January 1977.
                                   xxii

-------
                        I - INTRODUCTION
A.  PURPOSE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

    The  Environmental  Protection  Agency,   Region   VII,   has
determined  that  an  Environmental  Impact  Statement   (EIS)  is
required before the decision is made on the issuance of  the  new
source    National   Pollutant   Discharge   Elimination   System
(N.P.D.E.S.)  permit for the George Neal, Unit 4, Steam  Electric
Generating Station.  This determination is in accordance with the
rules  and  regulations  pursuant  to  Section  102(2)  (c)  of the
National Environmental Policy Act  of  1969  (NEPA)  and  Section
511 (c) (1)  of  the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments
of  1972  (FWtCA) .

    The EIS for  the  George  Neal,  Unit  4,  station  has  been
prepared  to  assess  the  total  environmental  impacts  of  the
project.  It is a joint EIS, prepared  in  conjunction  with  the
U.S.  Army  Corps of Engineers for the issuance of a Section 404,
Federal Water Pollution  Control  Act  Amendments  permit  and  a
Section 10, River and Harbor Act permit.  The statement will also
serve  as  the EIS for the Rural Electrification Administration's
issuance of loan guarantees for both generating and  transmission
facilities.    Both   the   Corps  of  Engineers  and  the  Rural
Electrification  Administration  (REA)  have  provided  extensive
input  into  this  document  and  it  is designed to identify the
significant impacts of all federal  actions  involved  with  this
facility.

    Section  402  of  the  Federal  Water  Pollution  Control Act
Amendments of 1972, Public Law 92-500, (FWPCA) ,  33  U.S.C.  1342
established  a  program  whereby  every  point  source  pollutant
discharger must obtain a  permit  to  continue  their  wastewater
discharge  into waters of the United States.  This permit program
is known as the National Pollutant Discharge  Elimination  System
(NPDES).   An  individual  permit  is conditioned so that various
levels of discnarge control are obtained by certain  dates   (July
1,  1977,  for  best practicable control technology available and
July  1,  1S>83,  for  best  available   technology   economically
achievable).   These  levels of discharge control are established
by effluents limitations as promulgated pursuant to Sections 301,
304, 306, 307 and 501 of FWPCA.

    The Corps of Engineers' authority  over  this  project  stems
from  Section  10  of the River and Barber Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C.
403, which governs activities in the  "Navigable  Waters  of  the
United  States" as defined in the Control of Federal Regulations,
33 CFR 209.260.  Any activity in a navigable water of the  United
States  below  the  level of ordinary high water (OHW)  requires a
permit from the Department of  the  Army  through  the  Chief  of
Engineers.   A Section 404 permit would also be required under the
provision  of FWPCA, 33 U.S.C. 1311, 1344.  Under Sections 10 and
                                1-1

-------
404, the Corps of Engineers permit  authority  is  only  tor  the
construction,  operation and maintenance of the intake and outlet
structure.

    Corn  Belt  Power  Cooperative  and  Northwest   Iowa   Power
Cooperative   have   applied   to   the   Rural   Electrification
Administration for loan guarantees to finance  25 MW and  100 MW,
respectively,  of  the  proposed Neal Unit 4.  These requests are
being evaluated to insure that reasonable  safeguards  are  being
taken to protect the health and safety of the public and that all
means  of  practical environmental protection are incorporated to
minimize the deleterious effects of the proposed action.

    Iowa Public Service Company (IPS)  and  twelve  other  private
and municipal utilities are the joint owners of the proposed Neal
Unit  4, a 576 megawatt (MW)  low sulfur coal-fired unit scheduled
for commercial operation in May 1979.  Table I-A-1 lists the Neal
Unit  4  owners  including  Interstate   Power   Company   (ISP),
Northwestern  Public  Service  Company   (NFS),  Corn  Belt  Power
Cooperative  (Corn Belt), Northwest Iowa Power Cooperative (NIPCO)
and eight municipal utilities.  Approximately 92 percent  of  the
plant's  capacity  is owned by the five utilities, IPS, ISP, NPS,
WIPCO and Corn Belt.  Four of these utilities are members of both
the jyiid-Continent Area Power Pool  (MAPP)  and  the  Mid-Continent
Area  Reliability  Coordination Agreement (MARCA) .  NIPCO and the
eight municipal utilities are connected to the MAPP  transmission
line network.

    As  the  major  cwner  of  the  unit,  IPS  has  planned  the
construction of this unit near its  existing  George  Neal  Steam
Electric  Station.   The  George Neal Station is located fourteen
miles south of Sioux City in the Port Neal Industrial District in
Woodbury County, Salix, Iowa.  A location map of Neal Unit  4  is
given in Exhibit I-A-1.

    The  budgeted  installed  cost o± Neal Unit 4 is $276,000,000
and construction began in March  1975  with  the  start  of  site
grading  and  drainage  work.   In  April  1975 work commenced on
underground circulating  water  piping,  pile  driving,  and  the
turbine generator foundation.

    By  the  end  of  March  1976 a total of $44,500,000 had been
spent on all phases of the project.  Of this amount approximately
$14,000,000  consists  of  site  specific  items  including  site
improvements,  earthwork  and piling, concrete, circulating water
system, underground electric ducts and a portion  of  engineering
and construction service costs.  A detailed construction schedule
is presented in Exhibit I-A-2.
                                1-2

-------
                   Share  In  Unit  4
Iowa Public Service Company
Interstate Power Company
Northwestern Public Service Company
Northwest Iowa Power Cooperative
Corn Belt Power Cooperative
Algona Municipal Utilities
Bancroft Municipal Utilities
Coon Rapids Municipal Utilities
Graettinger Municipal Light Plant
Laurens Municipal Light & Power
Milford Municipal Utilities
Spencer Municipal Utilities
City of Webster City, Iowa
43.403%
17.3617,
8.681%
17.361%
4.861%
2.604%
. 347%
.521%
. 174%
.521%
. 347%
1.215%
2.604%
250 MW
100 MW
50 MW
100 MW
28 MW
15 MW
2 MW
3 MW
1 MW
3 MW
2 MW
7 MW
15 MW
               100.000%
576 MW
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA

DATE:
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY -
OWNERS OF NEAL UNIT
SCALE:
NEAL UNIT 4
4

TABLE
I-A-1
1-3

-------
NEAL  UNIT  1 2&3
                                                US 20
                                    PROPOSED  NEAL UNIT 4
                                              INTERSTATE 80
                                         COUNCIL BLUFFS
       e
   envirosphere
     company
 A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
     NEAL UNIT 4 LOCATION MAP
                    DATE:
           SCALE:



            1-4
EXHIBIT

I - A - 1

-------
                                                                             S-I
I
o
I-J
                                                                                              I  i  I  COMMERCIAL Of ERATIONr"May 1978

-------
B.  PRINCIPAL OWNERS OF THE PROPOSED HEAL UNIT 4

    1.    Iowa Public Service Company

    Iowa Public Service Company (IPS)  is the principal  owner  of
the proposed Neal Unit 4 and controls approximately 43 percent of
the  total  shares.   As  the  principal  owner,  the  company is
responsible for the design and construction of the facility.   IPS
has contracted with EBASCO Services, Incorporated to be the major
consultant responsible fcr the design  and  construction  of  the
Projects^  EBASCO, in turn, has commissioned Envirosphere Company
(a division of EBASCO) to prepare the environmental assessment of
the  project.   The  assessment  has been used extensively in the
preparation of the EIS.

    IPS supplies gas and electric power to  approximately  twenty
percent  of  the  State  of  Iowa and to a small portion of South
Dakota.  IPS also supplies gas to the eastern part of  the  State
of  Nebraska.   This  area,  as  shewn  in Exhibit I-B-1, borders
Waterloo on the east, Audubon on the south,  Sioux  City  on  the
west, and Rock Valley on the north.

    In  1975, IPS provided electric and gas service to a total of
169,299 customers.   The  population  served  by  IPS  was  about
400,000 persons.

    2.    Interstate Power Company

    Interstate Power Company (ISP), owns over 17 percent interest
in the proposed Neal  Unit  4.   ISP  provides  natural  gas  and
electric  service to 252 communities in more than a 10,000 square
mile area within  northeast  and  north  central  Iowa,  southern
Minnesota and northwestern Illinois.

    The  total number of electric customers served by ISP in 1975
was 142,677.  The total number of natural gas  service  customers
was  41,357.   Dubuque,  Iowa  with a population of 62,309 is the
largest city serviced by ISP.

    3.    Northwest Iowa Power Cooperative

    Northwest Iowa Power Cooperative  (NIPCO), which  owns  17.361
percent interest in the proposed Neal Unit 4, is a rural electric
cooperative  owned  and  controlled  by  more  than  23,000 rural
northwest  lowans.   NIECO  consists  of   ten   rural   electric
cooperative   members  and  one  municipal  electric  cooperative
member.  NIPCO also wheels Bureau of Reclamation power to several
municipals in western  Iowa.   During   1975,  the  sales  to  the
cooperative  members  were  422,412,000 kWh which was 2.9 percent
over 1974 sales.
                                1-6

-------
 SOUTH
DAKOTA
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION Of EBASCO SfRVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
AREA SERVED BY IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE
COMPANY
DATE: . SCALE:
EXHIBIT
I-B-1

-------
    4.    Northwestern Public Service Company

    Northwestern Public Service Company (NFS)r  owns 8.681 percent
interest in the proposed Neal Unit 4, and has its headquarters in
Huron,  South Dakota.  NFS serves  approximately  50,000  electric
customers  in  108  communities and adjacent rural areas in east-
central South Dakota.  NFS also provides natural gas  service  to
customers  in  South  Dakota  and  Nebraska.   During 1975, sales
totaled 646,953,000 kWh which was 9.75 percent over 1974 sales.

    5.  -  Corn Belt Fower Cooperative

    Corn  Belt  Power,  a  rural   electric   cooperative,   owns
approximately  4.9  percent interest in the proposed Neal Unit 4.
This  generation  and  transmission  cooperative   is   presently
composed  of  15  members including North Iowa Municipal Electric
Cooperative (NIMECA), eight members of which are participants  in
the  proposed  Neal  Unit  4 project.  In 1975, Corn Belt sold in
excess of 923 million kWh of electric energy.
                                1-8

-------
C.  MEED FOE POWER

    1.   Regional Supply and Demand

         a.   Mid-Continent   Area    Reliability    Coordination
              Agreement  (MARCA) Region

    The  Federal Power Commission  (FPC), which was created by Act
of Congress to protect consumers, has the overall  responsibility
for  surveying  power  demand  and  supply, compiling records and
auditing accounting records of utility companies  throughout  the
United  States.   MARCA  has  been created in accordance with FPC
directives by the utilities within the States of Minnesota, Iowa,
North Dakota,  most  of  South  Dakota,  most  of  Nebraska,  and
portions  of  the  States  of  Wisconsin, Illinois and Montana as
outlined in Exhibit I-c-1.  MARCA provides  an  overview  of  the
planning  and  operating  activities  in  the  region  to  ensure
reliability of power generation  and  supply.   The  overview  of
regional  planning  is  provided  by  a specific annual reporting
procedure  to  MARCA  by  each  system  on  load  forecasts,  new
facilities  planned,  and the resulting generating capability and
reserve of the overall projected system.  MARCA was organized  in
1968  and  presently  has  a  membership  of  22  larger  systems
consisting of 11  investor-owned,  8  Generation  £  Transmission
cooperatives, 2 public power districts and a federal agency (U.S.
Bureau  of  Reclamation).   Otter Tail Power Company, a non-MARCA
member, operates in the MARCA region.  Data for this  utility  is
included  in the regional reports.  Manitoba Hydro-Electric Board
is an associate member of MARCA; however, data for this  Canadian
utility are not included in the reports.  All 22 MARCA utilities,
along with 12 smaller utilities, are members of the Mid-Continent
Area  Power  Pool (MAPP), Basin Electric Power Cooperative having
joined MAPP during 1975.

              i.  System Adjusted Net Capability*

    The projected adjusted net capability for  the  MARCA  region
for the year 1976 is approximately 20,200 MW.

    Exhibit  I-C-2 presents the projected adjusted net capability
for MARCA participants for the years 1976 through 1985.  As shown
on this exhibit, the adjusted net capability of MARCA members  is
anticipated to increase to about 32,400 MW by the year 1985.

              ii.  Total Firm Capacity Obligation**

    Based  en projected sales, projected seasonal peak demand and
other firm commitments of  MARCA  participants,  the  total  firm
capacity  obligation  is  expected  to increase from 19,200 MW in
1976 to about 33,200 MW in 1985, as shown in Exhibit I-C-2.
*   Adjusted Net Capability  -  defined  as  the  net  generating
    capability  plus  participation  purchases less participation
    sales.

**  Total Firm Capacity Obligation - defined as seasonal adjusted
    net demand plus net reserve capacity obligation.
                                1-9

-------
       o
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
     IOWA PUBLIC  SERVICE CO. -  NEAL UNIT 4
        MID-CONTINENT AREA RELIABILITY
        COORDINATION AGREEMENT REGION
DATE:
SCALE:

1-10
                                   EXHIBIT
                                   I-C-1

-------
       36-




       34-




       32-




       30-
    o   28-
    o
    o
    CO
        26-
    <   24-




    uj   22-




        20-




        18-
                            (O
                            r^-
                            
-------
              iii.   System Deficiency*

    Exhibit  l-C-2  indicated  that  the  total   firm   capacity
obligation  for  the  MARCA  region  is  expected  to  exceed its
adjusted net generating capability for a short  period  in  1978-
1979  and  for  the  period  1984-1985.  At the projected rate of
demand increase, the capacity deficiency  is  anticipated  to  be
about  800 toW  xn  1985.  As a result, MARCA members are planning
the net addition of generating capability including Neal  Unit  4
over the period 1976-1985 to meet their system demands.


         b.   Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP)  Region

    IPS is cne of 22 electric  utilities  constituting  the  MAPP
membership.   This  power  pool  was  formed in March, 1972.   Its
purpose is to coordinate generation and transmission of  electric
energy  to  the general public and to other electric distributing
agencies in the state of Iowa and neighboring states.  One of the
major objectives of MAPP is to coordinate the activities  of   its
members  in  planning,  constructing  and operating an integrated
electric  power  system  utilizing   the   latest   technological
facilities and fuel resources with minimal environmental impact.

    The  operating  areas  of  the  MAPP  members  are  in  close
proximity.   Their  systems   are   already   interconnected   by
transmission  lines  which  enables them to serve their customers
synchronously.  The  coordinated  activities  of  MAPP  are  also
shared  by  non-member utilities.  For instance, among the owners
of the proposed Neal Unit 4, NiPCO and eight municipal  utilities
are  not  MAPP  members  but  they are interconnected to the MAPP
system.  The list of MAPF members is given in Table I-C-1.

    The MAPP members, and consequently their  customers,  realize
many  benefits  (i.e.  economic, reliability, etc)  as a result of
coordinated installation, operation, generation and  transmission
of electrical energy.

    All  22  members  of  MAPP  are participants of MARCA and, as
such, are included in the  annual  regional  report  prepared  by
MARCA.

              i.  System Adjusted Net Capability

    The adjusted net capability of MAPP members for the year 1976
is  projected  to be about 19,870 Mfc.  Exhibit I-C-3 presents the
projected adjusted net capability for MAPP members for the  years
1976  through  1985.   As shown in this exhibit, the adjusted net
capability of MAPP members is anticipated to  increase  to  about
31,880 MW by the year 1985.
    System Deficiency - defined as total firm capacity obligation
    minus adjusted net capability.


                                1-12

-------
    Mid-Continent Area Power Pool
	Member Utilities	

Basin Electric Power  Cooperative

Central  Iowa Power Cooperative

Cooperative Power Association

Corn Belt  Power  Corporation

Dairyland  Power  Corporation

Eastern  Iowa Light and Power Corporation

Interstate Power Company

Iowa Electric Light and Power Cooperative

Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company

Iowa Power and Light  Company

Iowa Public Service Company

Iowa Southern Utilities Company

Lake Superior District Power Company

Minnesota Power & Light Company

Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc

Montana-Dakota Utilities Company

Nebraska Public Power District

Northern States Power Company

Northwestern Public Service Company

Omaha Public Power District

United Power Association

United States Bureau of Reclamation
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC
SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
MEMBERS OF MID-CONTINENT AREA POWER POOL
DATE:
SCALE:
TABLE
I-C-1
                1-13

-------
    o
    o
    CO
       36-





       34-





       32-





       30-
       26^
    <   24-
    o
    UJ

    2

       22-





       20-





        18-





        16-
                            (O
                            i^-
                            0>
                   N-
                   r^.
                   en
oo
i^-
0)
o>
h-
o>
o
03
O>
03
CVJ

00

O>
ro
GO
en
                                                YEARS
                            ADJUSTED NET CAPABILITY


                            TOTAL FIRM CAPACITY OBLIGATION
                  00
                  o>
in
oo
o>
 Data  Source:
A Report by Mid-Continent Area Reliability Co-ordination Agreement

(MARCA) to the Federal Power Commission Pursuant to FPC Docket R-362,

Appendix A-l, April 1,
        O
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SfRVICES INCORPORATED
         IOWA PUBLIC  SERVICE Co. -  NEAL UNIT 4
            PROJECTED TOTAL FIRM CAPACITY OBLIGATION

              AND ADJUSTED NET CAPABILITY OF MID-

               CONTINENT AREA POWER POOL MEMBERS
         DATE:
                                       1-14
                                  EXHIBIT


                                   EXHIBIT


                                    I-C-3

-------
              ii.  Total Firm Capacity Obligation

    Based  on  projected  sales  and  other firm commitments, the
total firm capacity obligation of MAPP  members  is  expected  to
increase  from 18,850 MW in 1976 to 32,640 MW in 1985 as shown in
Exhibit I-C-3.

              iii.  System Deficiency

    Exhibit  I-C-3  indicates  that  the  total   firm   capacity
obligation  of  the  MAPP  members  will  exceed the adjusted net
generating capability for the periods  1977-1979  and  1983-1985.
At  the  projected  rate  shown  in  this  exhibit,  the capacity
deficiency of MAPP will be 760 MW in 1985.   As  a  result,  MAPP
members  are  planning  the net addition of generating capability
over the period 1976-1985 to  meet  their  system  demands.   The
operation  of Neal Unit 4 can provide a portion of the additional
generating capability.

    2.   Iowa Public Service Company - Supply and Demand

         a.   System Adjusted Net Capability

    The net generating capabilities of the power plants owned  by
IPS are presented in Table I-C-2.  The adjusted net capability of
IPS at the end of the year 1975 was 855 MW.

    The  ^rejected  adjusted  net  capability of IPS for the year
1976 through 1985 is presented in Exhibit  I-C-4.   This  exhibit
does  not  include  consideration  of  the  proposed Neal Unit 4.
Moreover, tor the years beyond 1976, the projections assume  that
net  generating  capability  will  equal  adjusted net generating
capability; therefore, these projections assume that IPS will not
have participation sales of electrical energy during this period.

         b.   Total Firm Capacity Obligation

    IPS's total energy sales for the year 1975 were approximately
2,431,000,000 kilowatt-hours (kw-hr),  about  10  percent  higher
than  the  prior  year.  Approximately 2,387,000,000 kW-hr of net
sales were to ultimate customers  and  the  remaining  53,000,000
kW-hr  were  sold to other utilities for resale.  The 1975 energy
sales to various customer categories are given  in  Table  I-C-3.
Load  growth projections indicate that the required energy demand
will increase significantly due to population  growth,  increased
per  capita  consumption  of electricity and generally increasing
industrial use.

    While IPS must have reliable generating capability throughout
the year to meet its users' requirements, it must also  have  the
capability  to  provide  electricity during times of peak demand.
In this connection, MAl
-------
         Name  and  Location  of  Station
Steam Electric
       *
  Neal
  Maynard
  Kirk
  Hawkeye
  Carroll
  Eagle Grove
Total Steam Electric
Sioux City
Waterloo
Sioux City
Storm Lake
Carroll
Eagle Grove
           *
Gas Turbine
  Electrifarm
  Parr Station

Total Gas Turbine
Waterloo
Charles City
Total - All Stations Operated
 Winter capability rating
                            Capability
                                                     (kilowatts)
573,000
 81,000
 18,500
 22,786
 10,611
  9,842

715.739
 77,400
 36.420
113.820
                             854.549
Internal Combustion
Neal
Sheldon
Storm Lake
Sac City
Audubon
Emmets burg
Cherokee
Hampton
Ida Grove
Carroll
Eagle Grove
Total Internal Combustion

Sioux City
Sheldon
Storm Lake
Sac City
Audubon
Emmetsburg
Cherokee
Hampton
Ida Grove
Carroll
Eagle Grove


5,500
1,790
2,200
2,300
2,550
2,200
2,050
1,800
1,600
1,750
1.250
24,990

o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
NET GENERATING CAPABILITIES OF POWER
PLANTS OWNED BY IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
I-C-2
                              1-16

-------
     Ul
1400-



1300-



1200-



1100-



1000-



 900-



 800-



 700-



 600-



 500-
                            CD
                            h-
                            O)
                                  a>
                                oo
                                r-
                                CD
       en
       r-
       cn
o
oo
CT)
00
O)
CJ
00
O)
(O
00
O)
00
0>
If)
CO
01
                                                      YEARS
                	. ADJUSTED NET CAPABILITY *

                	___, TOTAL FIRM CAPACITY OBLIGATION
         includes 125 MW IPS ownership in Ottumwa Unit  in  1981.

Data So\-icf   A Repoii    Mid-Cost i .•  -. A   <,  iv.iai^lit  C  .  .
              (MARCA)  ;. o t.1 c Frri'-vHl  PO-, '' r  Commission  Pv i s ar.f

              Appt-:.-,.:; ix A-I , April  1 .  19 4,
                                                           FPC Docket R-362,
        e
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                 IOWA PUBLIC  SERVICE Co. - MEAL  UNIT 4
                   PROJECTED  TOTAL  FIRM CAPACITY OBLIGATION
                     AND ADJUSTED NET CAPABILITY OF IOWA
                    PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - 1976 to 1985
                DATE:
SCALE:

1-17
                                      EXHIBIT


                                       I-C-4

-------
        Sales  to Ultimate  Customers
 Residential




 Commercial




 Industrial




 Public Street  & Highway Lighting




 Other Sales to Public Authorities




   TOTAL Sales  to Ultimate  Customers




	Sales for Resale	




   GRAND TOTAL
   kW-hr
(thousands)




   924,193




   653,754




   607,251




    33,173




   159,050




 2,377,421




    53,368
o
envlrosphere
company
' A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC
ENERGY SALES
DATE:
SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL
BY IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE
IN 1975
SCALE:
UNIT 4
COMPANY


TABLE
I-C-3
                            1-18

-------
increase  at  approximately  a  six  percent growth rate to about
1560 MW in 1985.

         c.   System Deficiency

    Exhibit I-C-4, which does not include  the  addition  of  the
proposed  Neal  Unit 4, shows that total firm capacity obligation
for the IPS system will exceed its  adjusted  net  capability  in
1979.   At  the projected rate of increase in total firm capacity
obligation and without the addition of the proposed Neal Unit  4,
the IPS system will have an energy deficiency of 438 MW by 1985.

    3.   Other Major Neal 4 Owners

         a.   Interstate Power Company (ISP)

    Based on the projected data as reported to MABCA,  the  total
firm  capacity  obligation  of  ISP  is expected to increase from
708 MW  in  1976  to  1156 MW  in  1985,  and  the  adjusted  net
capability is expected to increase from 708 MW in 1976 to 1049 MW
in  1985.   This would result in a system deficiency of 107 MW in
1985.

         b.   Northwest Iowa Power Cooperative (NIPCO)

    Based  on  its  projected  system  demand   plus   additional
commitments  to  associated  municipal  utilities and other rural
cooperatives, NIPCO requires the  addition  of  100 MW  from  the
proposed  Neal  Unit  4  to  help  meet  its  total firm capacity
obligation in 1985.

         c.   Northwestern Public Service Company (NPS)

    Based on the projected data as reported to MAECA,  the  total
firm  capacity  obligation  of  NPS  is expected to increase from
202 MW in 1976 to 397 MW in 1985, and the adjusted net capability
is expected to increase from 202 MW in 1976 to  312 MW  in  1985.
This would result in a system deficiency of 85 MW in 1985.

         d.   Corn Belt Power Cooperative

    The projected data as reported to MARCA indicates  the  total
firm  capacity  obligation  of  Corn Belt is expected to increase
from 124 MW in 1975 to 237 MW  in  1985,  and  the  adjusted  net
capability  is expected to increase from 169 MW in 1974 to 178 i4W
in 1985.  This would result in a system deficiency  of  59 MW  in
1985.

    4.   Summary

    According to the information presented above, both MARCA  and
MAPP  are  planning  on  the addition of Neal Unit 4 to help meet
their system demand commitments over  the  period  from  1976  to
1985.   IPS has projected that, despite its conservation efforts.
                               1-19

-------
its total tirm capacity obligation will exceed its  adjusted  net
capability  in 1979 resulting in a system deficiency of 438 MW by
1985.  In addition,  each  of  the  other  major  owners  of  the
proposed Neal Unit 4 (ISF, NIPCO, NES, Corn Belt)  projects system
deficiencies  by  1985.   Consequently,  the proposed Neal Unit 4
electric generating unit is essential to the fulfillment  of  the
need  for power for the five utilities and is an integral part of
the future plans of the regional area power pool.
                                1-20

-------
                 II - DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT


A.  THE EXISTING PLANT - UNITS 1, 2 AND 3

    1.   General

    The existing George Meal Steam Electric Station is located on
a 500 acre site in the Port Neal Industrial District on the  east
bank of the Missouri River.  Exhibit II-A-1 is a plot plan of the
existing station.

    The  plant  is presently equipped with three coal-fired units
with a combined generating capacity of 997 megawatts  (MW).   Unit
1f  having  a  generating  capacity  of  147  MW,  was  put  into
commercial operation in 1964.   This  unit  has  a  cyclone  type
boiler   designed  to  operate  on  coal,  natural  gas,  or  the
combination of the two fuels.  Unit 2, having a rated  generating
capacity  of  330  MW, was put into commercial operation in 1972.
This unit has a pulverized coal type toiler and  is  designed  to
use  coal  with  gas  igniters.   Unit 3, a low sulfur pulverized
coal-fired unit, with a generating capacity of , 520 MW,  was  put
into commercial operation in December 1975.

    2.   Circulating Water System

    All three units at the plant are designed with a once-through
circulating water systein.  Units 1 and 2 withdraw  water  from  a
common  intake  structure on the Missouri River.  To remove waste
heat generated by the steam cycle, approximately  75,150  gallons
per  minute   (gpm)   and  130,500  gpm of cooling water are passed
through the Unit 1 and 2 condensers, respectively.   The  cooling
water is then discharged through a common seal well downstream of
the intake structure.  The average temperature rise of the Unit 1
and  2  discharge  is  about  22°F  during plant operation at 100
percent capacity factor.

    The Unit 3 circulating water system  operates  in  a  similar
manner  to Units 1 and 2.  Water is withdrawn from a conventional
intake structure on the Missouri River about  200  feet  upstream
from  the  Units 1 and 2 intake structure.  Approximately 286,200
gpm of condenser cooling water is circulated  through  tne  plant
and then discharged back to the river adjacent to the Units 1 and
2  discharge  at  a temperature rise of about 17.8°F during plant
operation at 100 percent capacity factor.  The discharge is  made
through  a  seal  well  adjacent  to  the Units 1 and 2 discharge
structure.

    The combined flow of the Units 1-3 discharge is approximately
491,850 gpm with a combined  temperature  rise  of  about  19.5°F
during  plant  operation  at  100  percent  capacity factor and a
combined temperature rise  of  16.5°F  at  an  85  percent  daily
average capacity factor.
                                II-l

-------
                                                                   161 KV TRANSMISSION LINE




                                                                            PLYMOUTH
  RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
TOP OF ROCK REVETMENT
                                                                                                                                                          19  Q 20
                                                   \             \    0      500*     1000'
                                                                                                                                                                COUNTY ROAD
e
envirosphere
company
•v D"VS(0. O' EB*-<;a SERVICES ^"OUPC*.*-;?
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
- NEAL UNIT 4
GEORGE NEAL STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - THE EXISTING PLANT
DATE:
SCALE:
EXHIBIT
II-A-1

-------
    3.   Air Quality Control System

    Air quality control is implemented  for  the  existing  units
through  the  use  of low sulfur coal, efficient combustion, high
efficiency electrostatic precipitators and an elevated release of
combustion products into the atmosphere.

    The coal burned at the existing Neal Station has  an  average
sulfur  content  of about 0.6 percent and an ash content of about
15 percent.  Typical  (average)  characteristics of this  coal  are
presented in Table II-A-1.

    It  should  be  noted  that the results of an analysis of the
coal delivered to the Neal Station  from  the  existing  mine  at
Hanna,   Wyoming   during   1975   vary  from  the  typical  coal
characteristics presented in Table II-A-1.   In  particular,  the
recent  coal analysis shows a reduction in ash and sulfur content
in the coal burned during 1975.  The ash content is reduced  from
an  average value of  15 percent as addressed in this report to an
average value of about 11 percent.  The sulfur content  addressed
in  this  report was 0.6 percent average and 0.9 percent maximum.
This is reduced to an average of 0.5 percent  and  a  maximum  of
about  0.6 percent.  The reduced environmental impacts associated
with burning this improved quality coal are discussed briefly  in
Chapter IV.  A summary of the 1975 coal analysis is as follows:
    Percent Moisture
    Percent Ash
    Percent Sulfur
    High Heat Value -
      Btu/lt (as fired)
Typical

 12.38
 10.95
  0.49
10,020
Minimum

 11. 16
  8.77
  0.36
 9,646
Maximum

 13.86
 13.32
  0.58
10,532
    The  amount of air consumed in each furnace during combustion
is  20  percent  above  the  stoichiometric  air-to-fuel   ratio,
resulting in maximum combustion efficiency and minimum production
of  unburned  hydrocarbons,  carbon  monoxide and soot.  However,
nitric oxide production increases moderately  as  the  amount  of
excess  air  rises  beyond  that  dictated  by the stoichiometric
ratio.

    Tne  incombustible  heavier  particles,  mainly  bottom  ash,
resulting  from coal combustion settle out of the combustion zone
into bottom ash hoppers.  The finer particles, consisting  mainly
of  airborne  fly  ash  and  soot, are collected by electrostatic
precipitators.

    The electrostatic precipitator for  Unit  1  is  a  hot  side
precipitator  with a guaranteed particulate removal efficiency of
99 percent.  The precipitator is  presently  operating  at  93-95
percent  collection  efficiency apparently due to the high carbon
content of the ash.  This problem is expected to be obviated with
the installation of a coal blending system presently under study.
                               II-3

-------










Typical Coal Characteristics
Proximate
Characteristics
Volatile Matter
Fixed Carbon
Moisture
Ash



Ultimate Characteristics
Carbon
Hydrogen
Sulfur
Nitrogen
Oxygen
Moisture
Ash









o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
Percent by Weight
29.00
38.00
18.00
15.00
100.00
49.69
4.50
0.61
1.20
11.00
18.00
15.00
100.00

IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4











TYPICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF COAL USED TABLE
AT UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 H-A-1
DATE: SCALE:
II-4

-------
The precipitator for Unit 2 is a cold side  precipitator  with  a
guaranteed  particulate  removal  efficiency  of 99 percent.  The
precipitator does not meet its guaranteed  collection  efficiency
and  is presently operating under a consent order from Region VII
of  the  EPA   (dated  August  7,  1975)   which  stipulates   that
compliance  with  the State of Iowa Air Quality Standards must be
achieved by October 1, 1978.  Tests, the results  of  which  have
been  favorable,  have  been  conducted using gas conditioning to
improve collection efficiency and a determination  will  be  made
whether   gas   conditioning,   an   add-on  precipitator,  or  a
combination  of  these  methods  will  be  used  to   bring   the
precipitator  to guaranteed efficiency.   Since the tests were not
conclusive by August 1, 1976,  an  extension  of  time  is  being
sought.  The electrostatic precipitator for Unit 3 is a cold side
precipitator  with a guaranteed particulate removal efficiency of
99.6 percent.   This  precipitator  is  operating  at  guaranteed
collection efficiency.

    Based  on  guaranteed  collection  efficiencies,  the maximum
particulate emission rate  from  any  unit  is  0.13  pounds  per
million  Btu   (ib/mB)   of  heat  input  which  is well within the
allowable Iowa emission standard for  particulates  for  existing
units.

    A  combination  of  low sulfur content and high heating value
for the coal burned in these units results in  a  maximum  sulfur
dioxide  emission rate of 1.3 Ib/mB which is well witnin the Iowa
emission standard (5.0 Ib/mB) for existing coal-fired units.

    Nitric oxide (NO)  is the remaining  major  gaseous  pollutant
that  a  fossil-fuel  electric  generating  station is capable of
releasing into the  atmosphere  at  a  significant  rate.   After
release into the atmosphere NO is oxidized, either directly or by
the  mucn  quicker  photochemical  reaction,  to  the  more toxic
nitrogen dioxide  (NO2).   Concentrations  of  NO  and  NO2  will
Henceforth be referred to as oxides of nitrogen (NOx).

    Conventional  NOx  control  techniques, based on limiting the
reaction of nitrogen and oxygen to NO in tne combustion zone, are
applied at the existing units.

    Maximum emission rates calculated for the existing units  are
shown in Table II-A-2.

    i*.    Boiler Stacks

    The stack for Unit 1 is 250  feet  high  and  has  an  inside
diameter  of  10.2  feet  at  the top.  This stack is designed to
release combustion gases at an exit temperature of 300°F  and  an
exit  velocity of 95 feet per second  (fps).  The stack for Unit 2
is 300  feet high and nas an inside diameter of 15.25 feet at  the
top.   This  stack  is designed to release combustion gases at an
exit temperature of 263°F and exit velocity of 90 fps.
                               II-5

-------
















Emissions (Lb/Hr)^

Nitrogen
Oxygen
Water Vapor
Carbon Dioxide
Sulfur Dioxide^/
Nitrogen Oxides
Particulates^
Emissions
Nitrogen Vol (%)
Oxygen Vol (9£)
Water Vapor Vol «'/c)
Carbon Dioxide Vol (V<)
Sulfur Dioxide (Ppm)
Nitrogen Dioxide (Ppm)
Particulates (GR/ACF)
Total Flue Gas (ACFM)
Sulfur Dioxide (Lb/mB)
















Nitrogen Dioxide (Lb/mB)
Particulates (Lb/mB)

Unit 1
1.110.000
74,600
115.000
300,000
2,970
2,080
150
71.8
4.2
11.6
12.3
560
820
0.02
529.000
2.0
2.5
0.1
Unit "•
2.310.000
155,000
239,000
624.000
6.180
2,470
410
71.8
4.2
11.6
12.3
470
470
0.046
1,150.000
2.0
1.0
0.13
Unit 3 Units 1, 2 And 3 Total
3,760,000
252.000
388,000
1. 01 0.000
10,020
4.010
270
71.8
4.2
11.6
12.3
560
470
0.23
1.680.000
2.0
1.0
0.053
7, 80,000
482,000
742,000
1,934,000
19,170
8,560
830
71.8
4.2
11.6
12.3
—
—
—
3,260,000
2.0
1.0
0.081















a/ Coal at 9000 Btu/Lb .
™ For Maximum Sulfur Content of 0.9% with all fuel Sulfur as SO for Unit 1-3.
™ Unit 1 40% of Coal Ash as furnace bottom Ash. 99.0% efficient electrostatic precipitator.
Unit 2 20'; of Coal Ash as furnace bottom Ash. 99.0'f efficient electrostatic precipitator.
Unit 3 20'/? of Coal Ash as bottom Ash. 99.6% efficient electrostatic precipitator.
e
envirosphere
company
' A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
MAXIMUM EMISSIONS FROM UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 TABLE
AT FULL CAPACITY OPERATION II-A-2
DATE; SCALE:


-------
    The stack tor Unit 3 is 400  feet  hign  and  nas  an  inside
diaflieter of 19.75 feet at the top.  The stack releases combustion
gases  at  an  exit  temperature  of  254°F  and exit velocity of
90 fps.

    The UTJVJ coordinates for the toiler  stacks  at  the  existing
Neal Station are as follows:
Unit 1

Unit 2

Unit 3

5.   Chemical Waste System
                     Latitude

                    42° - 18' -

                    42° - 18' - 40"N

                        - 19' - 40"N
              Longitude

            96° - 22'  - 25»W

            96° - 22'  - 25»W

            96° - 22'  - 23"W
    Sources of chemical wastes from the  existing  units  include
boiler  blowdown,  demineralizer  regeneration  waste  water  and
sanitary  wastes.   The   boiler   tlowdown   and   demineralizer
regeneration  wastes  are  discharged  into  the  river  with tne
circulating water  system  effluent.   The  sanitary  wastes  are
treated  in septic tanks and the effluent is discharged to a sand
filter type leaching field.

    6.   Water Treatment System

    Makeup water for the existing boilers is  presently  provided
by  wells.   The  treatment  processes  required  for  the boiler
feedwater consist of softening, gravity settling, filtration  and
demineralization.   Water  is softened by using lime and alum and
the resulting suspensions are settled with inert solids  present.
Because  the source is well water, minimal suspended solids enter
the softening units.  Following the settling process,  the  water
is  filtered  to  remove  all  remaining solid particles and then
passed  tnrough  the  demineralizers.   This  process   initially
consisted  of  two  trains of cationic and anionic exchangers for
Units 1 and 2.  Two more trains of appropriate  size  were  added
for Unit 3.

    The  settled  solids  are  discharged  to  a seal well in the
circulating water system.  The solids  are  soluble  in  and  are
diluted  by  the  large  flow  of water; therefore, only a slight
increase in the dissolved solids concentration of  the  discharge
water is observed.
    The   filter   backwashes
circulating water system.
are   also  discharged  into  the
    Condensate polishing demineralization was installed to  clean
the  system prior to initial start-up and prior to restarts.  The
process is not in service during normal operation.
                               II-7

-------
    7•    Ash Handling System

    Bottom ash sluiced from the boilers  and  fly  ash  from  the
electrostatic  precipitators  are  conveyed from each unit to ash
disposal ponds.

    The bottom ash from Unit 1 is pumped to an 11.7 acre pond and
fly ash froir Unit 1 and bottom and fly ash from Unit 2 are pumped
to a 28.6 acre pond.   Unit 3 is equipped with a 73 acre ash  pond
located  northeast of and adjacent to the Unit 2 pond.  Unit 3 is
also equipped with a fly ash silo designed  to  load  trucks  for
off-site disposal.

    Ash  pond  walls  are  constructed  from graded and compacted
material,  free  of  organic  components,   and   obtained   from
excavation within the pond area.

    8.    Transmission Facilities

    Iowa  Public   Service   Company   (IPS)    maintains   direct
interconnections  with Corn Belt Power Cooperative, Iowa-Illinois
Gas & Electric, Iowa Electric Light & Power - Central Iowa  Power
Cooperative,  Interstate  Power  Company, United States Bureau of
Reclamation and Omaha Public Power District.  In addition, IPS  is
a  part  of  a  315 kV network which links the Mid Continent Area
Power Pool with St. Louis, Minneapolis - St.   Paul,  St.  Joseph,
Wichita  and  Kansas City.  A terminal of this network is located
within the Port Neal Industrial District.

    The existing 161 kV switchyard serves the 147 MW  Unit 1  and
the 330 MW Unit 2.  The existing 345 - 161 kV Raun Substation has
been expanded to provide 345 kV terminals for the addition of the
Unit 3 system connection at 345 kV and a 345 kV transmission line
extension to Des Mcines.

    Transmission lines owned by IPS are shown in Exhibit II-A-2.

-------
MINNESOTA
                                                                                                    34.5 AND 22 KV  LINES




                                                                                                    69 KV AND  46 KV LINES




                                                                                                    161 KV LINE





                                                                                                    345 KV LINE
envirosphere
company
* ENVISION Of EBASCO SEBviCtS INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
THE EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINES OWNED BY IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
DATE: SCAIE:
EXHIBIT
1 1 - A - 2

-------
B.  THE PROPOSED PLANT

    1.   General

    Weal Unit 4 will be located approximately 1 3/4  miles  south
of  existing  Units  1,  2 and 3 as shown in Exhibit II-B-1.  This
unit,  having a net generating capacity of 576 MW, will consist of
a steam generator designed  to  burn  a  variety  of  low  sulfur
western  coals.   This  unit  will  consist  of  an  indoor type,
hydrogen  cooled,  3600  revolutions  per  minute  (rpm),  tandem
compound  four-flow turbine generator designed to operate at 2400
pounds per square inch gauge (psig) and 1000°F with 1000°F reheat
under throttle conditions.  The steam generator will  be  capable
of  delivering 4,515,000 pounds of steam per hour continuously at
2630 psig and 1005°F at the superheater outlet.

    The plant grade will be established at elevation  1076  feet.
This  elevation  provides approximately 5 feet of freeboard above
the U S Corps' of Engineers  predicted  one  percent -  100  year
flood elevation.* The plant river frontage is presently protected
by riprap along its full length.

    The  Iowa  Public  Service  Company  is  working  with  Rocky
Mountain Energy  Company,  a  subsidiary  of  the  Union  Pacific
Corporation,  on  a  plan for a joint venture to mine the primary
coal for Neal Unit 4 from the Red  Rim  area  in  Sweetwater  and
Carbon  Counties  in Wyoming.  A letter of intent has been signed
by the parties  and  negotiations  for  a  formal  agreement  are
progressing.  A subsidiary of Iowa Public Service Company will be
the  operating company.  The subsidiary has already filed for the
leases to the federal lands that  adjoin  lands  owned  by  Rocky
Mountain Energy Company.

    The  coal  will  be  transported  by unit trains on the Union
Pacific Railroad  which  goes  through  the  area.   The  Chicago
Northwestern  Raiiroad  will  take the unit trains from the Union
Pacific Railroad at Council Bluffs, Iowa or Fremont, Nebraska and
deliver them to the Neal Unit 4 site.

    2.   Circulating Water System

    The Neal Unit 4 proposed water  management  flow  diagram  is
presented in Exhibit II-B-2.  As indicated, the unit will utilise
a  once-through  circulating  water  system  discharging into the
Missouri River.   Water  will  be  withdrawn  from  a  reinforced
concrete  intake  structure  located  on  the  east  bank  of the
Missouri River.  Approximately 317,400 gpm of cooling water  will
be  passed through the condenser to remove about  2.7 x 10* Btu/hr
of waste heat and then discharged  back to  the  river  through   a
seal  well  located  downsteam  of  the  intake   structure.   The
temperature rise of the Neal Unit  4 discharge will be about   17°F
above  the intake water temperature during plant  operation at 100
percent capacity factor and approximately 14.5°F  at an b5 percent
daily  average  capacity  factor.   Exhibit II-tf-3   presents    a
*Personal  Communication  -  U.S.  Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha
District.
                               11-10

-------
                                                                                                             /  PLANT AREA

                                                                                                             /     UNIT 4
       o
   envirosphere
     company
* PIVISiO. O; tBASCO SEBVlaS 'NCOBPQgA
GEORGE NEAL STEAM ELECTRIC STATION,THE PROPOSED PLANT
                                          SCALE:
EXHIBIT


 II-B-1

-------
                                             SCREEN WASH
MISSOURI
                      MAX. CONDITION OH 100% CAPACITY
                      FACTOR EXCEPT WHEM MOTCO OTHERWISE
                      (E) DEMOTES EMCRCENCV PLOW
                      (t) DENOTES INTERMITTENT FLO!
                      (C) DENOTES CONTINUOUS FLOW
                      LEGEND
SLU06E
FLUC «*»

SLUD4E CAKE
OFF-SITE DISPOSAL
                                                                                                                                                            COAL  PILE
                                                                                                                                                              AREA



-1 r.1 J 780 (I) 1 -1 1 . 	
i| |i f v
- 1 I ' 11
•\ \\ \i
SURM J 1
TANK "*"" S~V
T»D(I) N.
f* 	 O\— — — •
-JL
' L. "
t r
SCTTLINft
TANK
! tx .
j : soon
^ .



	 ^.*2J1L
10 (I) 1 	 ' 	
* TANK


CCONOW- ,L
K
1.
TTo £| SEP
1 STORAK 1
|_ TANK \
MiN. 310 CC1 AVIi

ANT
yps
\\

OIL 1
RATOR | ?
i
;
	 L_L
L
4oo ( c) t
KEUNTION
SASIN
SEWAtE
FMEATMENT
	 »


SSOO aPD
FIELD
SETTLING
TANKS

IETENTION
SASIN

F LOG.- C LAI.
TREATMENT

klAX €><>O <|)


1
1
t
1
1

u
1
•»
1
1

STORH
HOLDIN*
BASIN
1_

— AC
                                                                                                                                                                   _ ACIUA1 SITE LOCATION
                                                                                                                                                                       IE DETEIMINED
                                                                                                                               O -4500 MAX.
                                                SNYDER OXBOW LAKE
      envirosphere
         company
                                                                       IOWA PUBLIC  SERVICE COMPANY-NEAL UNIT 4
                              PROPOSED  WATER  MANAGEMENT  FLOW   DIAGRAM
                                 DATE:
                                                                                                                  SCALE:
EXHIBIT
 II-B-2

-------
                              MWL EL. 1067 00
                          LWL EL. 1048.00


              FUTURE RIVER BED
                                RIP RAP EXIST

                                RIVER BED
                                                                         INTAKE PIPE



                                                                WINTER DISCHARGE
                      HWL EL. 1067.00
    EXIST. RIVER BED EL. 1043.001
                                                                              SECT. A
                                                                          FINISH ORADE EL. 1076.00
                                                    EXIST ORADE EL.IO64.00


                                             EXIST TOP OF SLOPE EL.IOC8.00
                               SECT. B
                                                                               p- HWL. EL. I0«7.00


                                                                                   rtOP OF SHEET PILE
                                                                                        EL. 1050.00
                                                                                                                EL. 1040.00
                                                                                      -CONCRETE WEIRS
                                                                                                                   EL.IOTS 0
                                                                                         CONCRETE APRON    \WINTER

                                                                                                         DISCHAR8E
                                                                   SHEET PILE CUT OFF WALL
                                                             >— EXIST. RIVER BED

                                                               EL. IO45.OO
                                                                                        SECT. C
                                                                                             10 0   tO  40   SO
                                                                                                 SCALE IN FEET
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF cBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED1
                                           IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. -  NEAL UNIT 4
                SECTIONAL VIEWS OF THE UNIT  4 INTAKE
                        AND DISCHARGE STRUCTURES
DATE:
EXHIBIT


 II-B-3

-------
schematic  drawing of the proposed intake and discharge structure
designs.

         a.   Intake Structure

    The deck of the intake structure will be at an  elevation  of
1076  feet  and  the  invert  will te set at the projected future
river bottom elevation of 1024.5  feet.   Two  vertical  one-half
capacity  circulating  water  pumps  will be provided in separate
pump chambers with each chamber subdivided into three 11  foot  2
inch  wide  bays.   Each bay will be provided with a trash racK, a
two speed traveling screen and  two  guides  which  can  be  used
either  for  stop  logs or for fine screens.  During normal plant
operation, both circulating water pumps will  be  operated.   The
velocity  through the six traveling screens will be about 0.9 fps
with an approach velocity of about 0.4 fps  at  the  design  mean
water  elevation  of 1055 feet  (river flow - 12,000 cfs).  During
the  navigational  season  which  extends  from   April   through
November,  the  velocity  through  the  traveling screens will be
about 0.7 fps with an approach velocity of about  0.3 fps  (river
flow - 50,000 cfs).

              i.   Traveling Screens

    The traveling screens, as shown on Exhibit  Il-B-4,  will  be
equipped  with  a fish protective system consisting of fish trays
attached to each screen panel.  Each panel will be  subjected  to
low and high pressure water jet sprays to remove fish and debris,
respectively.   The  system  presented  in Exhibit II-B-4 will be
modified so that fish will be washed into a trough  in  front  of
the  screens  and will te sluiced tc the river between the intake
and discharge structures via a  holding  tank.   Trash  collected
from  the  traveling  screens  will  be  returned  to  the  river
downstream of the intake structure via a separate debris  trough.
Logs  and debris collected at the trash racks will be left in the
river.  The  traveling  screens  will  operate  on  an  automatic
pressure  differential  control.   The  traveling screens will be
monitored and rotated periodically to prevent  sand  accumulation
at the base of the screens.  In addition, provisions will be made
to  allow  for  continuous operation of the traveling screens and
spray system during periods of high fish entrapment.

              ii.  Desanding Units

    Desander supply pumps will te located in the middle four bays
of the intake structure.  These pumps will supply  water  to  the
desanding  system  consisting of centrifugal sand separators that
will serve to remove sand prior to pumping  river  water  to  the
auxiliary  cooling systems and other service water systems.  This
will  prevent  excessive  abrasion  of  system  pumps  and   heat
exchanger tubing.

    The  sand  slurry  produced  in the desanding process will be
free of organics and will be directed to  the  circulating  water
                               11-14

-------
                         LOW PRESSURE
                         FISH WASHING
                         SYSTEM
                                                          DEFLECTOR
                                                          PLATE
                         NEOPRENE
                         DEFLECTOR
                         FISH SLUICE *
                         TROUGH
                        REFUSE  «
                        TROUGH
                                           CONVENTIONAL
                                           HIGH PRESSURE
                                           SPRAY
                                           SIDE ELEVATION
                                           FISH SCREEN
   envirosphere
      company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                           IOWA PUBLIC  SERVICE Co. - NEAL  UNIT  4
         TRAVELING SCREEN WITH FISH
              PROTECTION SYSTEM
                                        EXHIBIT
                                        II-B-4
DATE:
SCALE;

11-15

-------
discharge  for return to the river.  Because the sand slurry will
be  diluted  significantly,   the  resulting  increase   in   sand
concentration will be negligible.

         b.   Discharge Structure

    The inlet section of the discharge structure will be  a  seal
well consisting of a chamber of constant depth widening along its
length  and  a weir at the downstream end.  The outlet section of
the discharge structure will consist of a large chamber  with  an
overflow  weir,  stop logs and a regulating device for the winter
discharge.  Warm water from the winter discharge tunnel  will  be
used  to  melt  and/or  deflect floating ice just upstream of the
intake structure.  The discharge channel will  consist  of  sheet
pile walls and a rip-rap bed.

    3.   Fuel Handling System

    Sub-bituminous coal from the Red Rim area of Wyoming will  be
delivered  to  the site by unit train.  The train will proceed to
unloading hoppers where  an  automatic  system  will  unload  the
entire  unit  train,  consisting of about 10,000 tons or coal, in
three to four hours.  The  coal  will  be  transferred  from  tne
underground   hoppers  to  the  yard  conveyor  where  a  movable
stacker/reclaimer will stack out the coal into two or more piles.
Coal is reclaimed from the coal yard to the plant  silos  by  the
same  systeir  of overhead conveyors.  The coal yard storage piles
may be as high as 50 feet.  A total dead storage of 800,000  tons
and  a  live storage of 200,000 tons will occupy approximately 35
acres of the 450 acre site.

    In order that coal handling and storage  equipment  emissions
comply  with  EPA standards as set forth in 40 CFR 60  (maximum 20
percent opacity), all  equipment,  spouts,  chutes,  hoppers  and
conveyors  will  be  enclosed  ty  hoods, housings and casings to
suppress dust.  In addition, bag filter dust collectors  will  be
installed  at  the  reclaim pits and conveyor transfer points.  A
chemical spray dust suppression system will be  utilized  at  the
unloading hoppers to minimize fugitive dust emissions.

  •  4•   Air Quality Control System

    Air quality control  to  comply  with  National  Ambient  Air
Quality  Standards  and Federal New Stationary Source Performance
Standards will be implemented at Neal Unit 4 through use  of  low
sulfur    coal,   efficient   combustion,   a   high   efficiency
electrostatic precipitator and an elevated release of  combustion
products into the atmosphere.

         a.   Fuel Characteristics

    IPS has initiated a preliminary analysis,  consisting  of  30
test  borings,  in the Red Rim area.  Characteristics of the coal
from the area most  likely  to  be  used  for  Neal  Unit  4  are
                               11-16

-------
presented  on  Table  ll-B-1.   The  complete results of the test
boring analysis are presented in Appendix A-II-B.

    The coal proposed for Neal Unit 4 will be low sulfur  western
coal  with  an  average  heating  value  of 9507 Btu/lb.  At full
capacity  operation,  the   coal   consumption   rate   will   be
approximately 780,000 Ib/hour.

    The  average sulfur content of the coal will be approximately
0.32 percent which is sufficiently low so that complete oxidation
of the coal sulfur to sulfur dioxide (SO2) would not  cause  Neal
Unit  4  to violate the Federal New Stationary Source Performance
Standard of 1.2 Ib/mE of heat input.

    The average ash content of the coal  will  be  8.22  percent.
Particulate  matter  removal  is  required  in  order to meet the
Federal New Stationary Source Performance of 0.1  Ib/mB  of  heat
input.

    Characteristics of the typical western coal used in analyzing
the impact of Neal Unit 4 are presented in Table II-B-2.  Typical
ash  constitutents  of  this  coal are presented in Table II-B-3.
These  data  were  utilized  because  the  impact  analysis   was
completed prior to the availability of the Red Rim coal analysis.
The  reduced  environmental  impacts  associated with burning the
improved quality Red Rim  Area  coal  are  discussed  briefly  in
Chapter IV.

    During  the  time  the  mine in the Red Rim area (see Exhibit
II-B-5 and Table II-B-4) is being  developed  (2-5  years),  Neal
Unit  4  will  utilize  coal  from  the North Knobs area which is
situated a few miles to the north.   This  section  is  privately
owned  and  will  be surface mined under a mining permit from the
State of Wyoming.  Test borings will be performed  in  this  area
during  the summer of 1976 to determine the coal characteristics.
Preliminary indications are that the coal is similar to  that  of
the  Red Rim area.  Trace elements found in coal samples from the
North Knobs area are presented in Table II-B-5 and trace  element
concentrations  in  typical  western  coal, representative of the
principal and interim coal supply, are provided in Table II-B-6.

         b.   Combustion Reaction

    The coal  will  be  pulverized  prior  to  firing  to  obtain
thorough  and intimate mixing of fuel and air.  The amount of air
consumed in the furnace during  combustion  will  be  20  percent
above  the stoichiometric air-to-fuel ratio, resulting in maximum
combustion  efficiency  and  minimum   production   of   unburned
hydrocarbons,  carbon  monoxide and soot.  Production of nitrogen
oxides (NGx), however,  normally  increases  as  peak  combustion
efficiency is reached.  The control of NOx production is based on
reduction  of  combustion  flame  temperature  and control of the
amount and distribution of excess air  in  the  combustion  zone.
                               11-17

-------
Drill Hole
HHV
Sulfur
Moisture
Ash
(Btu/lb) (%) (%) (%)
Seam

Seam

Seam



(F2)
128
134
136
(Fl)
15
125
128
132
135
(G)
4
128
137
AVG
MAX
MIN

9
9
9

8
9
9
9
9

9
10
9
9
10
8

,970
,607
,327

,251
,345
,786
,652
,429

,465
,046
,706
,507
,046
,251

0.
0.
0.

0.
0.
0.
0.
0.

0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.

2
24
37

52
32
15
21
27

32
57
3
32
57
15

16
16
17

20
16
15
15
16

16
16
17
16
20
15

.54
.57
.71

.44
.01
.97
.74
.55

.17
.07
.39
.83
.44
.74

5.
7.
7.

13.
11.
6.
7.
8.

10.
5.
5.
8.
13.
5.

68
18
65

94
12
77
15
86

29
84
96
22
94
68
envirosphere
company
' A DIVISION Of E BASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
CHARACTERISTICS OF WESTERN COAL
TO BE USED AT NEAL UNIT 4
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
II-B-1
II-18

-------
Fuel Constituents


Proximate Analysis

Volatile Matter

Fixed Carbon

Ash

Moisture
       Totals
Fuel Constituents


Ultimate Analysis

Carbon

Hydrogen

Sulfur

Oxygen

Nitrogen

Ash

Moisture
       Totals
High Heat Value -
Btu/lb (as Fired)
 Percent  by Weight


      Typical

       32.6

       31.6

         5.8

	 30.0	
       100.00
 Percent by Weight


     Typical

       48.5

        3.4

        0.4

       11.2

        0.7

        5.8

       30.0
       100.00
        8.125
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. -
CHARACTERISTICS OF TYPICAL
NEAL UNIT 4
WESTERN COAL
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
II-B-2
                          11-19

-------
Ash Constituents
Ferric Oxide -
Lime —
Magnesia —
Sodium —
Potassium —
Silica —
Alumina -
Titanium —
Sulfur
Phosphorus —
Undetermined
Fe203
CaO
MgO
Na2O
K2
SiO2
AI2°3
Ti02
so3
P2o5

Typical
(Percent)
4.1
25.0
4.2
1.5
0.5
31.4
16.2
1.1
14.8
1.1
0.1
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. -
ASH CONSTITUENTS OF TYPICAL
NEAL UNIT 4
WESTERN COAL
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
II-B-3
11-20

-------
                        R90W
                                         R89W
     RME


     LEASED STATE LAND
      COMMITTED RME LAND
      OPEN FEDERAL LAND
                                                                                    T
                                                                                    2
                                                                                    T
                                                                                    2C
                                                                                    N
                      *Rocky Mountain Energy Company
       e
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF E8ASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
  IOWA PUBLIC  SERVICE  Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
          COAL AREA OWNERSHIP
DATE:
SCALE:
11-21
                                    EXHIBIT

                                    II-B- 5

-------
                          COAL SUPPLY LOCATION DESCRIPTION
                ROCK SPRINGS ROYALTY COMPANY - ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CO.
                         Agreement and Option - Subject Lands
                           Lease Agreement - Leased Premises
thence
thence
thence
thence
thence
thence
	 tj
N.
N.
S.
N.
N.
N.
45°
81°
8°
8£
81°
22 •
26'
34'
26'
34'
26'
E.
E.
E.
E.
W.
E.
a
a
a
a
a
a
Township 22 North,  Range 89 West,  6th P.M.

     Section 35:  All

Township 21 North,  Range 89 West,  6th P.M.

     Section  1:  All
     Section  3:  All
     Section 11:  All
     Section 13:  All,  except that portion  of the South Half (S%)  of Section 13,
                 Township 21 North,  Range  89 West,  6th P.M.,  Wyoming,
                  described by metes  and bounds as follows:
                    Beginning at^the  southwest corner  of said  Section 13;
                                         distance of  508.82 feet;
                                         distance of  1056.18  feet;
                                         distance of  10.0 feet;
                                         distance of  500.0  feet;
                                         distance of  10.0 feet;
                                         distance of  3346.97  feet
                 to the point of  beginning of a  curve to the  rigth  the  radius
                 of which is 11309.2 feet;
                                                                  central
                                                                        to
                 a point on the east boundary of said Section 13, from
                 which the southeast corner thereof bears S.  0 01'  E.  a
                 distance of 1110.56 feet;
                    thence N. 0 01'  W.  along the east boundary of said
                 Section 13 a distance  of  942.44 feet to a  point, from  which
                 the east quarter corner of said Section 13 bears N. 0° 01'  W.
                 a distance of 576.8 feet,  said  point being on a  curve  to  the
                 left  the radius  of  which  is 7739.47  feet and at which  point
                 a line tangent to said curve bears S.  85   35' W.;
                    thence along sais curve to the left through a  central
                 angle of 12° 23' a  distance of  1673.71 feet;
                    thence S. 73°12'  W.  a distance of  3271.1 feet;
                    thence N. 10°48'  W.  a distance of  150 feet;
                    thence S. 84°05'  W.  a distance of  470 feet;
                 more  or less,  to a  point  on the west boundary of said
                 Section 13. from which the west quarter corner thereof
                 bears N. 0° 11'  W.  a distance of 1741.07 feet;
                    thence S. 0 11'  E.  along the west boundary of said
                 Section 13 a distance  of  894 feet, more or less, to the
                 place of beginning;
                    said parcel of land  containing 89.7 acres,  more  or less,
  thence along said curve to the right through a
angle of 0 17" a distance of 55.3 feet,  more or less,
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE CO.
COAL SUPPLY LOCATION
- NEAL UNIT 4
DESCRIPTION
DATE:
TABLE
II- B- 4
                                          11-22

-------
                              TABLE II-B-4 (Cont'd)
Section 23:  All, except that portion of the North Half (N%) of the
             North Half (N%) of Section 23, Township 21 North,
             Range 89 West, 6th P.M., Wyoming, described by metes
             and bounds as follows:
               Beginning at the northeast corner of said Section 23;
               thence S. 89° 30' W. along the north boundary of said
             Section 23 a distance of 2623.1 feet, more or less, to
             the north quarter corner of said Section 23;
               thence westerly along the north boundary of said
             Section 23 a distance of 86.92 feet;
               thence S. 73° 12' W. a distance of 2660.01 feet;
             more or less, to a point on the west boundary of said
             Section 23, from which the northwest corner thereof
             bears N. 0° 05' W. a distance of 747.31 feet;
               thence S. 0° 05' E. along the west boundary of
             said Section 23 a distance of 365.44 feet, from which
             point the west quarter corner of said Section 23 bears
             S.0° 05' E. a distance of 1535.25 feet;
               thence N. 73° 12' E. a distance of 3386.36 feet;
               thence N. 74° 48' E. a distance of 638.83 feet,
             more or less, to a point on the north boundary of said
             Section 23, from which the northeast of 1399.55 feet;
             bears N. 89° 30' E. a distance of 1399.55 feet;
               thence S. 16° 48' E. a distance of 100 feet;
               thence N. 85° 30' E. a distance of 1374.84 feet,
             more or less, to the place of beginning;
               said parcel of land containing 28.4 acres, more or less,

Section 25:  All
Section 27:  All
o
envirosphere
company
/ A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
^ IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE CO
COAL
SUPPLY LOCATION
. - NEAL UNIT 4
DESCRIPTION
DATE:
TABLE
II- B- 4
(Cont'd)
                                      11-23

-------
       ELEMENT
    ANALYSIS OF ASH
                     ANALYSIS  OF WHOLE COAL
       Arsenic
       Barium
       Cadmium
       Chromium
       Copper
       Lead
       Zinc
       Uranium
     nd*
     2,840
     nd
       160
        60
        20
       105
        10.7
                             nd
                             270
                             nd
                              15
                              6
                              2
                              10
                              1.13
       Mercury
       Selenium
       Antimony
       Thorium
       Flourine

       Cyanide
     volitalized
     upon ashing
    no possible way
        to test
                                .15
                                .5
                                           nd
                                           nd
                                            80
       *Not Detected
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                         IOWA PUBLIC  SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
     TRACE ELEMENTS FOUND IN COAL SAMPLES
       NORTH KNOBS AREA, WYOMING (ppm)
DATE:
SCALE:

 11-24
                                    TABLE
                                    II-B-5

-------
Trace Element

Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Bromine
Cadmium
Chlorine
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Europium
Fluorine
Galluim
Germanium
Hafnium
Lanthanum
Lead
Lithium
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Samarium
Scandium
Selenuim
Strontium
Tantalum
Terbium
Thalluim
Tin
Vanadium
Zinc
Zirconium

Montana
Peabody Coal Co.
Big Sky Mine
(as received)

7.5 (none detected)
0.3
210
0.03 (none detected)
34.5
7.5 (none detected)
5.3 (none detected)
73.5
9
3.5
.9.8

3.8
6.5
3 (non detected)


16.5
10.5
48
0.46
24
5.3

•
0.4
185



4.5 (trace amount)
1.5 (none detected)
20.5
25.5

Montana
Western Energy Co.
Rosebud Mine
(as received)


Trace

Trace
Trace
15.8
0.17
124
2.2
0.33
75
0.06,
33.7*'


0.59
2.9
3.61

71
0.16^-'


0.40
0.75
0.012

0.19
0.046
1.1

4.1



aj  Two standard deviations above the mean value.
b/  Maximum reported value.
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. - NEAT. TINTT 4
AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS OF TRACE ELEMENTS
IN TYPICAL WESTERN COAL (ppm)
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
II-B-6
                             11-25

-------
The  Neal  Unit  4  furnace will utilize interstage air ports and
oft-stoichiometric firing to achieve these goals.

    The  incombustible  heavier  particles,  mainly  bottom  ash,
resulting  from  coal  combustion  will settle out of the firebox
into bottom ash hoppers.  Under optimum conditions, much  of  the
finer  particles, consisting mainly of airborne fly ash and soot,
will be collected by the electrostatic precipitator (discussed in
next section) .

         c.   Electrostatic Precipitator

    The electrostatic precipitator for Neal Unit 4 will be a  hot
side   precipitator   with   a   guaranteed  particulate  removal
efficiency cf 99.6 percent when  utilizing  coal  with  a  sulfur
content range of 0.3 to 0.7 percent and an ash content range of 3
to  18  percent.   The  iraximum  flue gas flow rate will be about
4,200,000 Actual Cubic Feet Per Minute  (ACFM) .  The  precipitator
will  be  designed  to  handle  loads  up  to  117,000  pounds of
particulate matter per hour.  Based on a maximum fly ash  content
of 18 percent,  the maximum particulate emission rate will be 0.05
Ib/mE   which   is  within  the  Federal  New  Stationary  Source
Performance Standard of 0.1 Ib/mE.

    A schematic of the  precipitator  for  Unit  4  is  shown  in
Exhibit II-£-6.

         d.   Boiler Stack

    As stated previously,  the  use  of  0.32  percent   (average)
sulfur  coal  will  ensure  Neal  Unit 4 compliance with Iowa and
federal emission standards for SO2.   The  National  Ambient  Air
Quality  Standards  for SO2 and the other emitted pollutants will
be met by releasing the gaseous pollutants  at  elevations  where
atmospheric   winds   will  normally  disperse  and  diffuse  the
pollutants before they reach ground level.

    The boiler stack on Neal Unit 4 will result in  the  elevated
release of gaseous pollutants.  It will have a height of 469 feet
and  a  top  outlet diameter of 25.75 feet.  As tne gas exits the
stack it will have a velocity of  90 fps  and  a  temperature  of
244°F which will give the stack plume additional buoyancy.

    The  UTM  coordinates  for the Unit 4 boiler stack will be as
follows:

                     Latitude                 Longitude

                   42° - 18' - 08"N          96° - 21' -  44"W

    Table II-B-7 presents the maximum emission  rates  calculated
for  the  gaseous  and  solid  combustion  products for  the major
pollutants leaving the stack.  Pollutant  concentrations  as  the
plume  diffuses  and  drifts  to  ground  level are dealt with in
                               11-26

-------
           HIGH VOLTAGE
   TRANSFORMER/RECTIFIER


         SAFETY RAILING
    PENTHOUSE ENCLOSING
 INSULATORS AND GAS SEALS
            PERFORATED
     DISTRIBUTION BAFFLE
       SUPPORT COLUMNS
                                                                            RAPPER - H.V. ELECTRODE
                                                RAPPER - COLLECTING SURFACE
                                                                            ACCESS PANEL
                                                                            INSULATOR
                                                                            H.V. WIRE SUPPORT
                                                                            H.V. DISCHARGE ELECTRODE
                                                                            GROUNDED
                                                                            COLLECTING SURFACE
                                                 QUICK OPENING DOOR
                                                 (INSPECTION PASSAGE
                                                 BETWEEN STAGES)
                                                                            WIRE WEIGHTS
        O
   envirosphere
      company
* DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
  IOWA PUBLIC  SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
         CUTAWAY VIEW  OF TYPICAL

         ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR
DATE:
 SCALE:
11-27
                                          EXHIBIT
                                            II-B-6

-------
Emissions (Ib/hr)


Sulfur Dioxide

Nitrogen Oxides

Particulates


Emissions
Nitrogen Vol (%)

Oxygen Vol (%)

Water Vapor Vol (%)

Carbon Dioxide Vol (%)

Total Flue Gas (ACFM)

Sulfur Dioxide (Ib/mB)^

Nitrogen Dioxide (Ib/mB)^/

Particulates (Ib/mB)^
                                            Unit 4
    7,090^

    4,140^
       71.8

        4.2

       11.6

       12.3

1,750,000

        1.2

        0.7

        0.07
                           Total Station
   26,260
   12,700

    1,260
       71.8

        4.2

       11.6

       12.3

5,010.000
^   Coal at 8125 Btu/Lb for Unit 4

y   Based on Federal New Stationary Source Performance Standards

^   For 0.49% Sulfur coal with fuel sulfur as SO2

=/   20% of coal ash as furnace bottom ash, 99.6% efficient electrostatic precipitator.
     Maximum fly  ash content  of 187<>.
envirosphere
company
,* DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
MAXIMUM EMISSIONS .CALCULATED FOR
NEAL UNIT 4 AND TOTAL STATION
AT FULL CAPACITY OPERATION
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
II-B-7
                                     11-28

-------
Section IV-C.  This information is  based  on  the  typical  coal
characteristics utilized prior to the Bed Rim area analysis.

    5.    Water Fretreatment System

    Desanded river water will be pumped from the intake structure
to the water pretreatment plant for potable water  usage,   boiler
feedwater,   fire   protection,  and  other  miscellaneous  plant
systems.  The water pretreatment system, consisting of two upflow
sand filters, will utilize the processes of chemical  coagulation
and filtration for the removal of suspended and colloidal  solids.
Each filter will be designed to treat a flow of 400 gpm.

    A  polywer  approved  by  the U.S. EPA for drinking water use
will be added as a coagulant to  improve  filtration  efficiency.
The   sand   filters  will  require  periodic  backwashing.    The
frequency of backwashing will be dependent upon the concentration
of  suspended  solids  in  the  filter  influent.   To  insure  a
continuous  supply  of  filtered  water, pretreated water  will be
retained in the service water storage tank.

    6.    Demineralizer System

    Boiler feedwater is the highest quality  water  required  for
plant  operation  and  must  be  free  of suspended and dissolved
solids prior to use.  Boiler makeup water for Neal Unit 4  will be
drawn from the service water storage tank and passed through  the
following demineralizaticn equipment:

         n    stratafced cation exchanger

         n    degasifier  (for CO2 removal)

         n    organic scavenger

         a    stratabed anion exchanger

         a    mixed bed cation-anion exchanger (polishing  unit)

    The demineralized water will  be  stored  in  the  condensate
storage tank for use in the steam cycle.

    7.    Potable Water System

    The  potable  water  system  will  be   designed   to    serve
approximately  100  plant personnel.  Water from the pretreatment
plant will be passed through an activated carbon filter and  then
chlorinated  to insure that drinking water standards will  be met.
An average demand of 4.5 gpm is anticipated for this system.    It
should be noted, however, that consumption will probably occur in
surges concurrent with working shift changes.
                               11-29

-------
    8.    Wastewater Characterization

    The wastewater discharged from various  plant  areas  can  be
classified  into three general categories: high-volume water from
main condenser cooling and auxiliary cooling systems;   low-volume
wastewater  resulting  from  operation and maintenance of various
process units; and  storm  water  runoff  from  material  storage
areas.     The   low-volume  wastewater  discharges  contain  high
suspended and/or dissolved solids; acidity or alkalinity; oil and
grease; heavy metals; etc.  These discharges will be  treated  to
comply   with   applicable   Iowa,  Nebraska  and  federal  NPDES
regulations.

         a.   Main Condenser Cooling Water Discharge

    A once-through cooling system  will  be  employed  to  remove
waste  heat  from  the  steam cycle.  A total flow of 317,400 gpm
will be discharged through a seal well directly into the Missouri
River.   The abrasive action of the sand, entrained in  the  river
water,   will remove any accumulated biological slime.   Therefore,
chemicals for the control of biological fouling will not be added
to the cooling water system.  The cooling  water  discharge  will
have  essentially  the  same  chemical  composition  as the river
water.

         b.   Auxiliary Cooling Water

    The cooling water discharged from auxiliary  heat  exchangers
and  coolers  will  be discharged into the Missouri River through
the seal well.  Total flow from the system will be 6,801 gpm.

    Periodically, raw river water may  be  passed  through  tnese
cooling  units  so  that  the  abrasive  action  of  the  river's
suspended solids may remove any  accumulated  biological  slimes.
No  chemical  biocides  will  be  added  in the auxiliary cooling
water.

         c.   Demineralizer Regeneration Wastewater

    Jt is anticipated that the demineralizer will be  regenerated
twice  per  day.   The  maximum  daily  quantity  of  regenerated
wastewater  produced  will  be  approximately   152,000   gallons
including  spent  chemicals and rinse water.  The wastewater will
oe discharged to a neutralization  tank  and  then  bled  to  the
treatment plant at a continuous rate of 150 gpm.

    The  spent  regenerant solution will contain eluted ions with
excess acid and/or caustic soda.  The eluted cations will include
calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium, and the eluted  anions
will  include sulfate, chloride, nitrate, phosphate, bicarbonate,
carbonate,   and   hydroxide.    The   total   dissolved   solids
concentration will range between 5,000 and 10,000 mg/1.
                               11-30

-------
         d.   Water  Pretreatment  and  Potable  Water  Treatment
              Wastes

    The   sand   filter  used  for  water  pretreatment  will  be
backwashed  periodically  to  remove  the  accumulated  suspended
solids from the filter ted.  The backwash water flow is estimated
to  be 1,200 gpm for a duration of 10-20 minutes depending on the
suspended  solids  concentration  in  raw  water.    The  backwash
frequency   will  also  depend  on  the  total  suspended  solids
concentration in the filter influent.

    The suspended solids in the filter backwash  wastewater  will
be  high   (over  3,000  mg/1)  at the beginning of the backwashing
cycle and will gradually decrease as the cycle  progresses.   The
average  suspended solids concentration will be approximately 900
mg/1.

    The wastewater discharged from the  potable  water  treatment
unit's  carton  filter,  will be relatively low in both suspended
solids concentration and volumetric flow rate.  Tfie carbon filter
backwashing frequency will  depend  upon  the  concentrations  of
total  suspended  solids  and  dissolved organic material.  After
carbon filter backwashing,  steam  will  be  passed  through  tne
column  to strip it of adsorbed organic compounds and restore the
adsorptive property of the column.

         e.   Boiler Elowdown And Boiler Draindown

    The boiler blowdown flow is estimated  to  be  60 gpm.   This
waste  stream  will  be  high  in  temperature  and  will contain
suspended solids.

    The flow discharged from the toiler draindown system will  be
approximately  1500 gpm.   The wastewater will be relatively hign
in temperature, suspended solids, iron  (Fe)  and  possibly  copper
(cu) .

         f.   Boiler Cleaning Wastes

    The internal heating surfaces of the boiler  are  cleaned  at
infrequent  intervals,  from  36 to 60 months.  Intervals between
cleanings are extended or reduced  as  conditions  warrant.   The
quantity  and  quality  of  the  wastewater is dependent upon the
method used for boiler cleaning.

    Chemical cleaning agents are usually employed to remove scale
and corrosion products  from  the  toiler  tubes.    The  cleaning
solutions   commonly   used   are:   hydroxyacetic-formic   acid,
ammoniated citric acid,  hydrochloric  acid,  alkaline  chelating
chemicals, and other organic solvents such as "Vertan 675".

    The  major  contaminants in the cleaning wastes will be total
suspended solids, total dissolved solids, iron, copper,  oil  and
grease.
                               11-31

-------
    The  total volume of wastewater generated during a lull cycle
cleaning oi the Unit 4 toiler is estimated to be 730,000 gallons,
including cleaning solution and rinse water.

         g.   Powdex Backwash

    Periodic backwashing of the powdex unit,  which will  maintain
high water quality in the boiler feed cycle,  will be performed to
remove spent resin.  Backwash flow is estimated to be 1,060 gpm.


         h.   Air Preheater Cleaning Wastes

    Air preheaters are usually cleaned by washing down  soot  and
fly  ash  accumulation  on  the surfaces with high-pressure water
jets.  Therefore, the washing wastewater will  contain  fly  ash,
soot,  rust,  oil  and grease, and metallic ions.  Depending upon
the sulfur content of the coal, the cleaning wastes are  more  or
less acidic in nature.

    The  cleaning frequency is determined by the accumulated time
under  oil-fired  startup  operation.    Usually,   cleaning   is
necessary  after  72 hours of operation on oil.  The total volume
of wastewater resulting from air preheater cleaning is  estimated
to be 192,000 gallons, i.e., 1,600 gpm of flow rate for two hours
duration tor each train of two air preheaters.

         i.   Plant Floor Drains and Miscellaneous Wastewaters

    This wastewater category represents  routine  discharge  from
floor  drains, including miscellaneous equipment cleaning wastes.
The flow rate and the  level  of  contamination  will  be  highly
dependent  upon  plant  maintenance  operations.   All mechanical
equipment  will  require  periodic  lubrication  and  they   are,
therefore,   potential   sources   of  oily  wastes.   Additional
pollutants will be suspended solids that may be washed into floor
drains.   The  average  waste  flow  rate  from  this  source  is
estimated to be 100 gpm.

         j.   Ash Systems Emergency Discharge

    The fly ash,  collected  using  electrostatic  precipitators,
will  be  conveyed pneumatically to fly ash silos, from which the
ash will be removed by truck for disposal.  The bottom  ash  will
be  hydraulically  transported  from  the bottom ash hoppers to a
dewatering tank.  The dewatered bottom ash will be  trucked  away
along  with  fly  ash  for  disposal.  Clarified effluent will be
recirculated to the bottom ash sluicing system. Therefore,  there
will  be  no  wastewater  discharges  from  the  ash handling and
sluicing  systems  during  normal  plant  operating   conditions.
However,  in  case  of  the  failure  of the jet exhauster at the
economizer ash silo, there will be an  emergency  discharge  from
the bottom asn sluicing system to the fly ash disposal site.  The
                               11-32

-------
ash   transport   water  system  flow  diagram  is  presented  in
Exhibit II-J3-7.

         k.   Sanitary Wastewater

    Sanitary wastewater is characterized by high  BOD,   suspended
solids  and  fecal  coliform  counts.  All sanitary waste streams
from locker rooms, showers and  toilets  will  be  collected  and
piped  to  tne  sanitary sewage treatment facility.  During plant
operation, it is estimated that a staff of 100  persons  will  be
stationed  at the plant over any 24-hour period.  Based on a flow
of 35  gallons  per  capita  per  day,  the  sanitary  wastewater
produced  will  be  3,500  gallons  per day (gpd).  Typical water
quality characteristics of  the  sanitary  wastes,  exclusive  of
coliform bacteria, are expected as follows:

                        BODS                     180 mg/1
                        Suspended Solids         200 mg/1
                        Settleable Solids         60 ml/1
         1.   Coal Pile Runoff

    Coal pile runoff is characterized by high  suspended  solids.
The  pH of coal pile runoff will partially depend upon the sulfur
content of the coal.  In general, lew sulfur  coal  will  have  a
high  calcium  content resulting in a high pH of any runoff water
entering the holding basin.  This  is  supported  by  field  data
obtained from studies at Neal Unit 3 indicating pH values of 7-9.
The  suspended  solids result from coal handling operations which
tend to generate many fine particulates through abrasion.

    The total  volume  of  runoff  will  be  dependent  upon  the
rainfall    duration    and    intensity,   antecedent   rainfall
characteristics, and physical conditions at the coal  pile  area.
The  total volume to be handled is estimated to be 6.51 mgd based
on a 10-year 24-hour rainfall event  (5.0  inches)   and  a  total
catchment area of 48 acres.

    9.    Wastewater Treatment Systems

    Eased on water quality characteristics, the plant  wastewater
flows  can  be  segregated into five different categories.  These
are as follows:

         a    Acid  wastes  (demineralizer   regenerant   wastes)
              requiring pH adjustment pretreatment.

         n    Oily wastes  (plant floor drainage)  requiring  oil-
              water separation pretreatment.

         n    Non-metal  contaminated  wastes   (filter  backwash,
              plant  drainage,  etc)   requiring sedimentation for
              suspended solids removal.
                               11-33

-------
VC-II

-------
         a    Metal  contaminated  wastes  (boiler  cleaning  and
              drain  down  flows,  air  preheater  cleaning wash,
              powdex backwash,  and  toiler  blowdown)   requiring
              physicochemical  treatment  for  suspended  solids,
              iron and copper removal.

         n    Sanitary wastewater requiring biological  treatment
              for suspended solids and BOD removal.

    The  proposed  wastewater  treatment  block  flow  diagram is
presented in Exhibit XI-B-8.  The estimated flow  rate  for  each
waste  stream  and its associated treatment process unit capacity
are presented in Table II-B-8.

    As indicated in ixhibit II-B-8,  three  retention  ponds  are
proposed  tc  provide flexibility in tne collection, equalization
and treatment of plant wastewaters.

    Pond A will be sized to contain the entire volume  of  Unit <*
boiler  cleaning wastes which is estimated at 750,000 gallons.  A.
private contractor will provide a temporary pipeline tor drainage
of the cleaning wastes from the boiler to the pond and also  will
remove the cleaning wastes for disposal off-site.

    Pond  2.  will  be  sized  at  300,000  gallons  to accomplish
equalization of the intermittent and high flow  rate  wastewaters
for  the  downstream  physicochemical  treatment units.  The pond
will be operated in a  filling-empty  cycle  mode  to  accomodate
either  boiler  draindown  or  air preheated cleaning wastewater.
Average pond discnarge will be 100 gpm,  for  the  daily  average
inflow,  and  a  maximum  flow of 200 gpm will be pumped when tne
pond receives cleaning wastes.

    Pond C will be sized at 50,000  gallons  for  equalizing  the
filter  backwash flow.   The pond will discharge a continuous flow
of 300 gpm to the downstream physical treatment process.

         a.    Demineralizer Regenerant Wastes Neutralization

    Demineralizer regenerant wastes and acid wastewater from  the
acid  drainage  sump  will  be conveyed to a neutralization basin
(approximately  180,000  gallons)   for  neutralization  and  flow
equalization.  Subsequently, the self-neutralized wastewater will
be discharged at a controlled rate ot  150 gpm  and  pH  adjusted
within  the  range  of   6.5 -  9.0  prior to flowing to Retention
Pond C for treatment as described in "d" below.

         b.    Treatment of Oily Wastes - Floor Drainage

    All plant areas that have tne  potential  for  producing  oil
spills will be equipped with drains to collect all liquid wastes.
These  streams will be piped to an cil-water separator system for
treatment.
                               11-35

-------
1 	
env
c<
' A DIVISION OF E

COAL PILE RUNOFF

BOILER CLEANING

DEMINERALIZER REGENERATION
WASTES W/pH CONTROL

FILTER BACKWASHING
(WATER PRE -TREAT. 8 POTABLE)

PLANT DRAINAGE SUMP
(OIL SEPARATOR)
1 	 *-Conc. oil to oil tonk
BOILER SLOWDOWN

POWDEX BACKWASHING

AIR PREHEATER CLEANING

BOILER DRAIN DOWN

6.51 MGD


150 (C)

1290(1)
100(1)
60 CC)
240 CD
1060(1)
1600 (I)
1500 (1)


» RETENTION
POND A


POND B — — — —

RETENTION
POND C
0
o
MIXING
TANKS
4
FIOCCULATION Fl(
TANKS
I
SETTLING S
f»-- TANKS fj--
Ig Ig
A"
1 1, *
t »00
MIXING
TANKS
4
DCCULATION
TANKS
\
ETTLING
TANKS
1,,?§ ^ TO
FLOW EXPRESSED IN GPM
TINUOUS FLOW
:RMITTENT FLOW
RGENCY FLOW
EXHIBIT



-------
   Wastewater Source

Pond B:
Boiler blowdown
Boiler blowdown
Powdex backwashing
Air preheater cleaning
Boiler draindown

Pond C:
Demineralizer
  regenerant wastes
Plant drainage sump
Filter backwashing
Flow Rate
  (gpm)


     60
    240
  1,060
  1,600
  1,500


    150

    100
  1,250
   Assumed
   Duration
(hr/operation)
 Continuous
     1.0
     0.5
     2.0
     3.0
  Continuous
     Total
  Wastewater
     Volume	
 86,400 gpd
 14,400 gpd
 31,800 gallons
192,000 gallons
270,000 gallons
216,000 gpd
   Recommended
    Basis for
Treatment Process
 Design Capacity
        60
        10
        15
       100
       100
       150
20
0.3
(Twice
per day)
120,000 gpd
45,000 gpd
100
50
o
envirosphere
company
_A DIVISION Of EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED—
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY -
NEAL UNIT 4
UNIT 4 WASTEWATER FLOWS
DATE:
SCALE:
TABLE
II-B-8

-------
    The oil-water  separator  system  will  have  a  capacity  of
100 gpm  and  will  consist  of two stages.   The first stage will
remove free oil and suspended solids by gravity  separation,  arid
will  prevent  the  second  stage from being overloaded with high
free  oil  concentrations.   The   second   stage   will   employ
coalescence to break emulsions.

    The  emulsions  can be of two types, mechanical and chemical.
Mechanical emulsions result from physical agitation.  For example
the use of centrifugal pumps will produce  mechanical  emulsions.
Chemical  emulsions result from the addition of surfactants which
form stable emulsions.  Chemical  emulsions  cannot  normally  be
broken  by  physical means.  When chemical emulsions are present,
pretreatment will be required to destabilize the  emulsion.   Tne
addition of alum, with or without pH adjustment, is commonly used
to  break  chemical  emulsions.   Once  the  emulsion  is broken,
physical methods are again used to separate the oil.

         c.   Treatment of Metal Cleaning Wastewater

    Physicochemical treatment will  be  provided  to  treat  Neal
Unit U   wastewaters   expected   to   contain   relatively  high
concentrations  of  iron  and/or   copper.    As   indicated   in
Exhibit II-E-8,  Pond B  discharge  will  be directed to a mixing
tank where pH will be  adjusted  and  polymer  added  to  enhance
precipitation of metal ions.  Mixing tank effluent will flow to a
flocculation  tank  for  development  of adequate floes, and then
discharged to a settling tank.  Sludge will be disposed of at the
fly ash disposal area.

    The pE of the chemically treated effluent will be adjusted if
necessary to meet  pH  limitations  (6.5  to  9.0)   before  being
discharged to the Missouri River.

         d.   Treatment of Non-Metal Contaminated Wastes

    Retention  Pond C  effluent  will   require   only   physical
treatment  to satisfy effluent limitations as determined on a net
discharge basis.  The flow will be controlled at an average  rate
of  300 gpm  and  directed to a mixing tank for pH adjustment and
polymer addition as required.  The wastewater will then  flow  to
two  settling  tanks for suspended solids removal.   The provision
of two settling  tanks  will  allow  periodic  maintenance  of  a
settling  tank  without  affecting treatment of tnese flows.  The
settling tank effluent will satisfy applicable  requirements  and
will be discharged to the river.

         e.   Treatment of Sanitary Wastewater

    Sanitary wastewater treatment will  be  accomplished  with  a
Smith and Loveless "Oxigest" treatment plant.  The system will be
operated  in  an extended aeration activated sludge mode and will
be designed to treat a daily BOD loading of 20 pounds and have  a
hydraulic  capacity  of   10,000 gpd.  A removable stainless steel
                               11-38

-------
screening basket will  te  provided  to  remove  unusually  large
solids  from the raw wastewater entering the plant.   The aeration
chamber will provide approximately a 24-hour  detention  time  at
design flows.

    The aeration system will consist of two blowers with a design
capacity  of  46  cubic  feet per minute (cfm)  at 3.5 psig.  At a
flow  of  100,000 gpd,  the  clarifier  will  provide  a  minimum
over±low  rate of 263 gpd/sq ft.  The effluent will be discharged
into a leaching field  and  will  not  exceed  25 mg/1  BODS  and
25 mg/1 suspended solids.

    Excess  sludge  will  be periodically removed from the system
and disposed of at a local treatment facility.

         f.   Treatment of Coal Pile Runoff

    To treat coal pile runoff a holding  pond  will  be  provided
with  sufficient  storage  capacity to retain the entire 6.51 mgd
resulting from a 10 year 24 hour rainfall event.  The  pond  also
will  provide  sufficient  detention  time to produce an effluent
with a total suspended solids concentration of  less than 50 mg/1.

    10.  Solid Waste Disposal Area

    The solid waste disposal area will consist  of  approximately
114  acres  of  land  and will provide storage for sludge and ash
generated  by  Neal  Unit 4.   Ash  will  be  mixed  with   water
(approximately 15 percent by weight) during transport by truck to
minimize  fugitive  dust emissions during unloading.  Operational
procedure will include alternating layers of waste material  with
layers  of  soil to provide the potential for reclamation of this
area at some future date.  Provisions will be made at  the  solid
waste  disposal  area  via  water truck to maintain fugitive dust
emissions at a minimuir level.

    11.  Transmission Facilities

    The additional transmission facilities that will be  required
for  Neal  Unit 4  will  consist  of a 345 kv line, 1.82 miles in
length, connecting the Raun Substation to  the  proposed  Neal  4
Substation.    Right-of-way   for   this  line  segment  will  be
predominantly across land owned by Iowa Public  Service  Company.
The  remaining  portions  will  be located either on the Woodbury
County road right-of-way or on rights-of-way secured by voluntary
easement from industrial customers located along the  route.   No
special  maintenance  requirements  of  these  rights-of-way  are
expected since all properties traversed by the  line  are  eitner
under  cultivation  or  will  be  mewed  by  either the county or
private property owner.   This  route  was  selected  from  among
several  alternate  routes  and  was authorized in all details by
action of the Iowa Commerce Commission Decision and  Order  dated
September 25, 1975, under Docket No. E-17776.
                               11-39

-------
    A  345 kV  line approximately 23.3 miles in length is planned
to connect Raun Substation and the U.S.  Bureau  of  Reclamation,
Sioux  City  substation located near Hinton, Iowa.  The line will
be supported by steel pole H-frame structures averaging 105  feet
in   height.    No   special   maintenance  requirements  of  the
right-of-way are anticipated because of the  agricultural  nature
of   the   land.    The  route  is  depicted  on  Exhibit II-B-9.
Acquisition of right-of-way will be conducted under the rules  of
the Iowa CciruTierce commission.

    Route selection for transmission facilities was determined on
the   basis  of  aerial  photographic  interpretation,  land  use
considerations, distance between terminals and consultation  with
the  Iowa  Commerce  Coirnriission.   The environmental criteria and
guidelines to be followed for the  transmission  facilities  will
consider  those  set forth by the U.S. Department of Interior and
Agriculture arid will be in conformance with the rules of the Iowa
Commerce Commission.

    12.  Permits

    Table II-B-9 presents a listing  or  permits,  certifications
and  approvals  required  from  various  governmental  regulatory
agencies in connection with the  construction  and  operation  of
Meal Unit 4.
                               11-40

-------
                        WOOD6UNY AND PLYMOUTH COUNTIES
                        MOWD3CO BOUTt OF 345 KV LINE
                         IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
                           SIOUX CITY, IOWA
   envirosphere
      company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                           IOWA  PUBLIC  SERVICE  Co. -  MEAL UNIT 4
TRANSMISSION ROUTES
                                                                                  EXHIBIT
II-B-9
                          DATE:
                                          11-41

-------
AGENCY
Federal Aviation
Administration
Iowa Natural Resources
Council
PERMIT
Stack Construction Approval
#75-CE-579-OE
Boiler Bldg. Construction
Approval
#75-CE-579-OE
Woodbury County Planning & Certificate of Zoning
Zoning Compliance
#ZA 404 Building Permit
Corps of Engineers
Construction on Rivers
(Sect 10)
(Includes Sect 404 Permit)
Iowa Conservation Commission Construction of Intake &
Discharge Structures
Environmental Protection Determination under Sect 316
Agency (a) and (b)


NPDES (National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System
Non Significant Deterioration
Declaration - Sect 306
Iowa Dept of Environmental Sanitary Disposal System
Quality Construction




e
envirosphere
company
*A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
Sanitary Disposal System
Operation
Temporary Permit to Discharge
Water
Waste Water Disposal System
Construction
Waste Water Disposal System
Operation
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. - NEAL UNIT
PERMITS REQUIRED
DATE:
FILED
11-12-75
11-12-75
8- 6-75
8- 6-75
10- 6-75
7-22-76
5-31-74
5-74

7-30-75
7-30-75
8-23-74
3-30-76
8-23-74
4


APPROVED
1-19-76
12-30-75
3- 1-76
3- 1-76

8-13-76


5-26-76


9-10-74


TABLE
II-B-9
11-42

-------
AGENCY
PERMIT FILED
APPROVED
Iowa Dept of Environmental Waste Water Disposal System
Quality Certification Sect 401
Air Pollution Control Equip- 1-26-76 4r 15-76
ment Construction-



Precipitator
Air Pollution Control Equip-
ment Construction-Coal
Handling



United States Geological Mining Permit
Survey Reclamation Permit
Wyoming Department of Land Permit, Water Permit
Environmental Quality Air Permit
Sweetwater and Carbon Building Permits
Counties Planning and
Zoning Department
envirosphere
company
* DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE CO - NEAL UNIT 4
PERMITS REQUIRED
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
II-B-9
(Cont'd)
11-43

-------

-------
         Ill - ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING WITHOUT THE PROJECT
A.  GEOLOGY

    The site for Neal Unit 4 is located within the Middle Western
Upland Plain physiographic  sub-unit.   Most  of  the  region  is
covered  by varying thicknesses of Pleistocene to recent sediment
consisting of glacial tills, loess,  glacial  outwash  and  river
deposits.   Bedrock  in  the  region  is  generally flat lying or
slightly dipping south and east.

    1»   Geomorphology

    The landforms, soils and surficial geology  of  the  proposed
site  itself,  are  expressions  of  the dynamics of the Missouri
River,  Physiographically the  site  is  located  on  the  broad,
nearly  flat  alluvial plain of the river.  This plain was formed
as the meandering river shifted  its  course  between  the  loess
capped  bluffs (over 3 miles to the southwest and over 5 miles to
the Northeast) over a period of geologic time.  Evidence of  this
shifting  can  be  seen  in  the oxbow lakes of the area, such as
Browns Lake and meander scars visible in the aerial photos of the
flood plain.

    The channel in the vicinity of the proposed site has adjusted
radically over the past two  hundred  years  both  naturally  and
through  man's  intervention.   Schumm  *  recounts how the river
between Sioux City and Platteville has  been  reduced  in  length
from  about 250 miles in 1804 to approximately 135 miles in 1960.
The alluvial land to the south of the proposed site represents an
abandoned reach of channel.

    The plant site is located on the outside of a  meander  bend.
Typically,  this  is  an  area  of  bank  instability  and unless
protected, erosion can be expected to occur. Conversely, it is an
optimum point for water extraction  as  less  silting  of  intake
works would occur at this point of the river bank.

    As  the  river  has shifted laterally the different materials
deposited have corresponded to the energy of  that  part  of  the
fluvial  system.    This  alluvial material varies from fine silts
and clays deposited in low energy situations, such  as  in  oxbow
lakes  to  coarse  gravels  and  sands  deposited  in high energy
environments such as bars.

    2.   Bedrock

    The lateral variability can be seen in the soil  types  which
form on the different materials.  Exhibit III-A-1 is a map of the
soil  series  in the vicinity of the proposed site.  These series
are identified  and  their  properties  are  described  in  Table
III-A-1.   They  are  representative  of the Albaton-flaynie-Onawa
Association of alluvial soils.
                                  Hl-l

-------
                                                                   IOOO
                                                    200O
                                                                   FEET
            1 -  Haynie Silt Loam




            2 -  Blake Sllty Clay Loam




            3 -  On HUB iilty Clay




            4 -  Mondale Silt Loam




            5 -  Albaton Clay
                        6 - Sarpy Loamy Fine Sand




                        7 - Alluvial Land




                        8 - Grable Silty Clay Loam




                        9 - Grfibie Silt Lotra




                       10 - Carr  Fine Sandy Lo*m
        o
   envirosphere
     company
, A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
 IOWA  PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
               SOILS INDEX MAP
DATE:
SCALE:



III-2
                                    EXHIBIT

                                    11I-A- 1

-------
M.,|,
Svmbol I Name
1 llayrm- -Mil Loam
Blake Nilix clay loam
3 Onawa siltv clay
I Mondale sill loam
S Alb.uon cla\
i
6 Sarp\ loam\ fine sand
Alluvial land
S . Grablt Mlty clay loam
^ ! tirahle silt loam
10 (.arr fine sandv loam

Depth
{ K.chcs)
0-90
0-20
20-60
0-29
29-60
0-10
10-12
21-90
0-60
0-24
24-60

0-10
10-20
20-60
0-20
20-60
0-33
3 3 -"?0

Unified
Classification
ML or ML-C1-
CL or CH
ML-Cl. or ML or CL
CH
CL or ML-CL
CL; CH or ML-CL
ML-CL
CH
CH
SM or SP-SM
SM or SP-SM
GC-SP
CL' or ML-CL
ML
SM
ML
SM or SP-SM
SM or SC
SM

Permeability
(in., hr)
0.63 - 2.0
0.2 - 2.0
0.63 - 6.3
0.06 - 0.2
0.63 - 6.3
0.6* - 2.0
0.63 - 2.0
< 0.2
<0.02
> 20.0
>20.0
-
0.63 - 2.0
0.63 - 2.0
6.3 - 20.0
0.63 - 2.0
6.3 - 20.0
2.3 - 6.3
2.0 - 6.3

Shrink-Swell
Potential
Low
Moderate to High
Moderate
High
Low to Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
High
High
Low
Low
-
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Low to Moderate
Moderate
Low
Low

Remarks
Erodible; possible dusi or
blowing soil hazard

Mav he net and boggv:
severe leach field limitations
Severe leach field limitations
May be wet and boggy,
May be subject to blowing
and dust hazard
Highly variable;
severe leach field limitations
May be wet and boggv
-
Erodible and may be subjcc ;
to liquefaction

Source    florster. ct^il  —/

envirosphere
company

IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY -
SOIL PROPERTIES IN THE AREA OF
DATE:
NEAL UNIT 4
THE NEAL SITE
SCA1E:

'".ABLE
III 4- i


-------
    While depositing laterally the river  has  also  built  up  a
thick  vertical  accumulation of material.  Preliminary drillings
at the site show at least 74 feet of sands  and  silts  near  the
river bank.  Water wells and other borings in the vicinity of the
proposed  site  show that from 110 to 150 feet of alluvium covers
the underlying bedrock.

    The topmost bedrock units found at depth in the area are  the
Cretaceous  Dakota  Group  of  sandstones  and shales.  These are
relatively flat lying and have an approximate thickness  of  3000
feet.   The  next oldest unit is a 500 foot thickness of Devonian
and Upper Ordovician  limestone.   Lower  Ordovician  strata  are
represented  by  the Decorah-Platteville Formation, the St. Peter
sandstone  and  the  Praire-Du  Chien   dolomite.    Depths   and
thicknesses of the later formations are difficult to estimate for
the Sioux City region because of the lack of deep wells.

    3.   Mineral Resources

    Except for sands and gravels found in the alluvium, there are
no known mineral resources among the earth materials present.  No
active mining of the aggregates is done locally.

    H.   Seismology

    The proposed site  is  located  in  the  relatively  inactive
Central  Stable  Platform between the Sioux Uplift and the Forest
City Basin.  There are no known major active faults in the  area;
however,  it  is  in  a  Zone I  seismic risk area implying minor
seismic accelerations may be  expected  and  designed  for.   The
closest earthquake to the site occurred near Sioux City, about 10
miles  to  the  north, in 1872.  This quake had an intensity of V
(Modified Mercali 1931) indicating only  slight  damage  such  as
cracked  plaster  in  some buildings.  Table III-A-2 includes the
other earthquakes which have been felt in  the  vicinity  of  the
proposed  site in recent history.  All of these may be considered
intermediate to minor  in  intensity.   The  strongest,  with  an
Intensity  of  VII, caused little damage to properly designed and
constructed buildings.  No surface disturbance or  fissuring  has
been noted for any of these quakes.
                                   III-4

-------







Year
1872
K>79
i9o:
1910
1938

1877
14] 1





1967
1927
1946
1906
1867

Location
Sioux City, Iowa
South Dakota
eastern Nebraska
Columbus. Nebraska
Sioux Falls, Nebraska

hastern Nebraska
South Dakota
South Dakota
White Cloud. Mo.
Wessington, S.D.
Manhattan. Kansas
Lawrence. Kansas

Intensity*
V
V
V
V
V

VII
V
V
V
VI
VII
Vll
Approximate Distance
From Site (Miles)
10
70
"0
80
90

1 10
170
170
190
190
230
250
Source: NO A A 3A














*Modified Mercali, 1931
0
envirosp
compc
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERV
, IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
* TABLE
there SEISMOLOGY IN THE AREA OF THE NEAL SITE m-A-2
my
CES INCORPORATED DATE: SCALE:

III-5

-------
B.  HYDROLOGY

    1.   Surface Water

    The Missouri River is the primary source of surface water for
the George Neal Steam Electric Station.

    Descriptions of this River have appeared  numerous  times  in
the literature *,2,3 but will be reviewed briefly here to provide
a  scenario  for  detailed  ecological  data  to  follow (Section
III-C).

    The Missouri River originates in southern Montana, and  flows
for  about  1833  miles  before reaching the proposed Neal Unit 4
site.  It is the longest river in North America, traversing  over
2464  miles and seven states before joining the Mississippi River
above St. Louis, Missouri.  It drains approximately one-sixth  of
the  continental  United  States  and a small part of Canada1 and
over its course declines from an elevation  of  about  1860  feet
mean  sea  level (MSL) to about 1070 feet MSL.  Records of stream
flow maintained by the U.S. Geological Survey at the  Sioux  City
gage  station,  16  miles  above  the  Neal site, show an average
discharge of 31,860 cubic feet per  second  (cfs)  when  computed
over  a  77-year  period. However, these averages are higher than
present mean discharge rates due to the inclusion of  many  years
of preimpoundment data in the calculations.

    While extreme flows of 2500 to 441,000 cfs nave been noted at
Sioux  City,  Iowa  in  the past, the river is now regulated as a
result of Congressional legislation (Flood Control Act  of  1944)
which  authorized  the  construction of impoundments on the upper
Missouri River and its tributaries.

    The river flow in the Missouri River main stem is  controlled
by  a  series  of six storage reservoirs located above Sioux City
and operated by the  Reservoir  Control  Center,  Missouri  River
Division of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers  (Corps of Engineers)
located in Omaha, Nebraska.  These reservoirs are Fort Peck  (mile
1775),  Fort Randall  (mile 880), Garrison  (mile  1390), Oahe  (mile
1072), Big Bend  (mile 987), and Gavins Point   (mile  811).   They
were   completed  in  1943,  1956,  1960,  1963,  1964  and  1964
respectively.  The normal operation of the  Missouri  River  main
stem  reservoir  system  did  not  commence   until  1967. In 1964
construction was completed on the Big Bend dam,  the last  of  the
main  stem  dams, located south of Pierre, South Dakota; however,
due to the  meteorological  conditions  which  persisted  in  the
entire  main  stem reservoir drainage area during the period from
1964 through 1967, the initial fill of the overall system was not
accomplished until 1967.   At  full  capacity,   these  reservoirs
impound water in over one-half of the upper 1500 miles of river2.
Gavins  Point  Dam  is used by the Corps of Engineers to regulate
downstream flows in the Missouri River and acts  as a control  for
the section of the Missouri in the vicinity of the Neal site.
                                  III-6

-------
    Releases of water from Gavins Point Dam during the navigation
season,  from  about  April 1  to  December 1,   are  dictated  by
navigation needs to provide a 9-foot navigation channel extending
from Sioux City to the mouth of the Missouri River.  The  channel
has  more  or  less been stabilized with pile or stone fill dikes
and revetments to maintain an average river width of 800 feet and
a navigation channel  width  of  300  feet.   Under  normal  flow
conditions, the velocity of the streamflow in the vicinity of the
Neal site varies between 3 and 5 feet per second  (fps).

    Releases  of  water  from  Gavins  Point  Dam during the non-
navigation  season,  from  about  December 1  to   April 1,   are
scheduled  to  meet  the  interim  flow  requirements  for stream
sanitation and supplemental power  generation.   At  present,  the
minimum flow release anticipated by the Corps of Engineers during
the  non-navigation  season  is  about  6000 cfs.s Local flooding
caused by river  ice  jams  are  experienced  during  the  winter
season.   The  length  of tne Missouri River navigation season is
determined by the initial freeze and breakup  dates  of  the  ice
flows in the river.  According to a recent report by the Corps of
Engineers,6 the months exhibiting the highest potential for river
icing are December through March.

         a.   Monthly River Flows

    Appendix Exhibits  A-III-B-1  through  A-III-B-12  present  a
statistical  analysis  of Missouri River flows in the vicinity of
the Neal site based on United  States  Geological  Survey   (USGS)
daily average historical records? obtained at the Sioux City gage
station  for  the  eight-year period from 1967 through 1974.  The
results pertaining to maximum, average arid minimum daily  average
flows  are  given  in  Table III-B-1.  In addition, the predicted
average monthly Missouri River flows at Sioux City, Iowa based on
the Corps of Engineers' study* for the current  (1970)   level  of
basin  water resource development followed by a recurrence of the
hydrologic period 1898-1972 are presented in Table III-B-2  along
with the USGS recorded river flows for the period 1967-1974.

         b.   Low Flow Conditions

    In order to determine the appropriate low flow for the  river
in  tfte  vicinity of the Neal Station, the flows during the eight
year period  1967-1974  (this  period  represents  normal  system
operation)   were  analyzed  statistically for the one in ten year
minimum average seven consecutive day  low  flow  (MA7CDLF),  and
then  adjusted  (by  several  methods)  to  correct for the above
average runoff during this period.

    The procedure utilizing the Gumbel distribution8 is  to  take
the MA7CDLF for each of the eight years of record, and plot these
low  flows  on  Gumbel paper using the Weibull9 plotting position
for the observed flows.  The MA7CDLF for each of the eight  years
is as follows:
                                  II1-7

-------
Month
* January
' February
* March
April
May-

June
July
August
September
October
'November
^December
Maximum Flow
(cfs)
28,400
60,000
41,800
76,400
51,200

69,800
54,100
58,500
56,500
53,100
55,700
48,200
Mean Flow
(cfs)
16,750
18,950
26,340
35,910
36,530

38,010
38,300
41,670
40,850
39,620
38,500
20,290
Minimum Flow
(cfs)
5,000
6,270
7,400
24,200
24,600

21,100
29,400
31,000
27,800
24,400
13,700
6,240
Months exhibiting the highest potential for river icing.
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION Of EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
MISSOURI RIVER FLOW RATES AT
SIOUX CITY, IOWA
1967-1974
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
III-B-1
                                III-S

-------
AVERAGE MONTHLY MISSOURI RIVER FLOWS AT  SIOUX  CITY,  IOWA
FOR
Month
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Annual
THE PERIODS 1898-1972 and 1967
Average Flow (cfs)
for the Period 1898-1972
Based on the Current
Basin Development (a)
15400
17000
26200
32700
32800
33200
35000
36800
36400
34900
35100
17700
29400
-1974
Average Flow
(cfs) for the Period
1967-1974(b)
16750
18950
26340
35910
36530
38010
38900
41670
40850
39620
38500
20290
32690
(a)   Based on Corps predictions.




(b)   Based on USGS flow records.
e
envirosphere
company
* DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
COMPARISON OF PREDICTED AND MEASURED
AVERAGE MONTHLY RIVER FLOWS
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
III-B-2
                      III-9

-------
              year                          MA7CDLF (cfs)
              1967                              7,410
              1968                             10,966
              1969                             10,231
              1970                             12,157
              1971                             12,857
              1972                             17,143
              1973                             20,271
              1974                             13,929

    The  above  data  were plotted as a frequency distribution on
Gusnbel paper arid the 1 in 10 year MA7CDLF was extrapolated.   For
the  years  1967-1974, the 1 in 10 year MA7CDLF is about 7200 cfs
as shown on Exhibit III-B-1.

    Having obtained the 1 in 10 year MA7CDLF  for  the  1967-1974
period, the low flow was adjusted by three methods to correct for
the  above  average  runoff during this period.  The first method
was to  compare  the  average  runoff  from  the  Missouri  River
Drainage Basin above Sioux City foi the period from 1698 to 1974,
with  the above average runoff over the same basin for the period
from 1967 to 19?4.  The average runoff for the former period  was
24,600,000  acre-feet,  arid  28,030,000  acre-fet't for the latter
period*.  The resulting correction factor is 0.38,  Applying this
factor to the 1957-1974 1 in 10 year MA7CDLF, the  adjusted  flow
becomes 6336 cfs.

    The  seccn I  method was to compare the Missouri River flow in
the vicinity of 3ioux City, Iowa for the  period  1398  to  1966,
with  the  period  1967 to 1974.  The average flow for the former
period was 31,680 cfs, and for the latter period, it  was  32,730
cfs.   The  .resulting  correction  factor is 0.97.  Applying this
factor, the adjusted 1 in 10 year MA7CDLF is 6984 cfs.

    The third method was to compare the Corps predicted  Missouri
River  flows for the current (1970) level of basin water resource
development followed by a recurrence  of  the  hydrologic  period
from  1898 tc 1972, with the measured flows at Sioux City for the
1967 to 1974 period.  Table III-B-2 shows  these  average  flows.
The average annual flow for the former period was 29,400 cfs, and
32,690  cfs,  for  the  latter  period.  The resulting correction
factor is 0.90, and the adjusted 1 in  10  year  MA7CDLF  becomes
6480 cfs.

    The  correction  factors and adjusted low flows determined by
these three methods are tabulated below:

                                                 Adjusted
    Method         Correction Factor        1 in 10  year MA7CDLF

      1                 0.88                     6336 cfs
      2                 0.97                     6984 cfs
      3                 0.90                     6480 cfs
                                  111-10

-------
   25
o
o
o
o
*
o
0
0
o
LU


LU
CD

-------
    On the basis  of  this  analysis,  it  is  concluded  that  a
representative  1  in  10  year MA7CDLF for the current method of
river operation would be about 6500 cfs.

The Iowa  Department  of  Environmental  Quality  has  based  its
analysis  of  low flow on the period of record, 1954-1972.  Their
analysis for this 19 year period yields a 1 in 10 year MA7CDLF of
6000 cfs*.

         c.   Monthly River Temperatures

    Based on maximum  daily  water  temperature  measurements  as
recorded  during  the  11  year  period,  1955-1965, at the Omaha
Metropolitan Utilities District (MUD)  Florence  Water  Treatment
Plant   (located  85 miles south of the Neal Station) and reported
by Ebasco10 the estimated frequencies that given temperatures are
equaled or exceeded are as follows:

              Temperature (°F)    Frequency Equaled or Exceeded
                                             (percent)

                   84                         0.32
                   83                         0.91
                   82                         1.98
                   81                         3.75

    Based on the analysis of daily temperature data  recorded  at
the  Neal Station Unit 1 intake during the nine year period 1964-
1972**, the monthly  average  temperature  ranges  from  36°F  in
January  to  77°F  in July.  The minimum daily temperature ranges
from 33°F during the months of December through .Vlarch to 68°F  in
July.   Maximum  daily temperatures range from 47°F in January to
83F in July.

    Exhibit II1-B-2 presents the statistical  analysis  for  July
which  represents  a  typical  summer  month.  Analysis of winter
water temperatures yields values slightly higher than the  actual
ambient   river   temperature   due   to  interference  from  the
recirculation of a small volume of discharge water  in  front  of
the  Unit  1  trashracks  to prevent icing.  It is estimated that
this  deicing  recirculation  may  raise  the  water  temperature
entering the plant by about 1 degree Fahrenheit  (F) .

    Table  III-B-3  presents  the  monthly  average,  minimum and
maximum ambient  river  temperatures  based  on  the  statistical
analysis of data measured daily at the Unit  1 intake.

    2.   Groundwater

    The Missouri River Valley in the vicinity of  the  Neal  site
has  two  major  aquifers,  the Dakota  sandstone and the  alluvial
fill of the valley.  The Dakota  sandstone   is   a   high   yielding
artesian  aquifer  which  is  used   extensively  for  community and
commerical supplies to the north and east  of  the   site.   Sioux
                                  111-12

-------
                                          ei-m
   o
 &<
IS?
                                     AMBIENT  RIVER TEMPERATURE (f)

-------

t !
! Mix Temp Mean Temp
Mjnth :F; (F)
!-naary 47 | 3<,
t :
1
i Febru-i.iy 4H 36
March 5'J 40

April i 66 bl
! 1
May i 84 60

June ; 39 7;

July 83 -;!
August 81 75
September 78 67
October t,7 56
November 54 42
December 50 37
i



Min Temp
(F;
33


33
33









36

43




57

68
66
52
45
35
33











OIOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
.
envirosphere MISSOURI RIVER AMBIENT WATER TEMPERATURES
company
f A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
rii-B-3


111-14

-------
City  obtains  its water supply, approximately 28 million gallons
per day (mgd), from 16 wells  in  the  Dakota  sandstone.   These
wells yield up to 1400 gallons per minute (gpm)12.

    Wells  utilizing  the  Dakota  aquifer  are  not found in the
immediate vicinity of the site.  The closest  are  those  in  the
Sergeant  Bluff  area,  about  6 miles to the north.  These wells
yield between 20 and 600 gpm from the Dakota layer which is about
340 feet thick.  The sandstone aquifer is generally topped by  15
to  90 feet of shale,  wells drilled to the Dakota Group near the
existing Neal units indicate the existence of a least  five  feet
of shale and up to 140 feet of alluvial fill.

    The  sands and gravels deposited in the Missouri River Valley
constitute another major aquifer.  In the immediate  vicinity  of
the  site  the  alluvium  is  tapped  primarily  for domestic and
industrial water supplies.

    A sample of wells within two miles of the site shows  that  a
number  of residences obtained water supplies from well points in
the alluvium.  These are generally bacteriologically safe but may
have problems with high iron or hydrogen sulfide content13.  More
than 15 miles to the southeast, the towns  of  Onawa,  which  has
wells yielding 2.2 mgd, and Whiting, with wells yielding 0.4 mgd,
use the alluvium as a source of their community supplies.

    The depth of groundwater varies from near surface adjacent to
the river, to about 18 feet in some parts of the site.  The water
table appears to slope generally downstream and toward the river.
As  the  river  and aquifer appear to be hydraulically connected,
fluctuations in the river level will  cause  fluctuation  in  the
groundwater level.

    Yields from the alluvial aquifer may be quite high because of
the  permeable  nature  of  the  sands and gravels.  Five 12-inch
wells were drilled in 1965 for the Terra Chemical  Company  which
is  located  adjacent  to the existing units.  The wells were 110
feet deep and produced 650 gpm with only 2 to 6 feet of  drawdown
with a specific yield of 200 to 300 gpm per foot of drawdown.

    3.   Water Usage

    The major users of water in the vicinity of the proposed site
are industries and the George Neal Steam Electric  Station.   The
municipalities  of Sioux City, Iowa and Dakota City, Nebraska are
the major municipal users.

    The  industrial  facilities  include   livestock   and   meat
processing,  food  processing  and  fertilizer  manufacturing and
together with the municipalities utilize  groundwater  for  their
needs.   The Neal Station uses Missouri River water for the major
part of its water requirements.
                                 111-15

-------
    The list of major water users in  the  area  surrounding  the
proposed  site  is given in Table III-B-4.  This table also gives
the source  and  quantities  for  each  user  and  the  treatment
provided before disposal.
                                  111-16

-------














INDUSTRIAL
NAME
PRODLCT, PROCESS OR SERVICE
The Beerman Brothers. Sergeant Bluff. Iowa
Alfalfa Dehydration
Flavor Land Industries. Sioux City. Iowa
(Formerly Needham Packing)
Cattle Processing
Flavor Land Industries. Sioux City, Iowa
(Formerly Needham By Products)
Rendering Plant. Meat & Hide By Products
Iowa Beef Packers. S Sioux City. Nebraska
Cattle Processing
Iowa Public Service Co . Port Ncal. Iowa
Units 1 2 & 3 Coal-Fired SES
Kay Dee Feed Co , Sioux City. Iowa
Agricultural Fertilizer
Kind and Knox Gelatin Inc . Sergeant Bluff.
Iowa — Gelatin Manufacture
Nutra Flow. Sioux City. Iowa
Manufacturers of Liquid Fertilizer
Raskin Packing Co . Sioux Citv. Iowa
Cattle Processing
Sioux Citv Cold Storage. Sioux City. Iowa
Frozen Food Products
Sioux City Dressed Beef
See Flavor Land Industries
Sioux Citv Stock Yards. Sioux City. Iowa
Livestock Sales Holding Pens
Swift & Co . Sioux Citv. Iowa
Hog Processing
PROCESS
WET DRY
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X Animal Intake
and Flushing
X
WATER
AMOUNT
SOURCE GPM
No Process Water
3 Wells 695
2 Wells 2.146
3 Wells 2.100
Missouri 490.000
River and
Wells
Well and 90
City Water
Well 695
City Water 1.000
System
3 Wells 35
Well plus 430
City Water

4 Wells 5,530
Wells 165
DISPOSAL
TREATED UNTREATED


Screening.
City Stp
Primary before-
City Stp
Iron Removal
Pressure Sand Filters.
Aeration
Sanitary Cooling Water
Septic Tank Untreated
Cooling Only
Plant Flotation
City Stp
Daily Sampling Water
Ouality and Temperature
City Stp
No Process Wastewater
Heat Exchanger Cooling

Crude Screening
City Stp
Vibrating Screen
City Stp
RECEIVING

Missouri
Missouri
Missouri
Missouri
105 Acre
Lagoon
Evaporation
Missouri &
Floyd
Missouri
Floyd

Missouri
Missouri
PRODUCT
Livestock
Feed
Beef for
Consumer Mkt
Meat and Hide
By-Product
Beef for
Processors
and Market
Electric
Power
Agricultural
Fertilizer
Gelatin for Food.
Pharmaceutal and
Photography
Agricultural
Fertilizer
Beef Carcass
Frozen Meat &
Food Products

Livestock
Sales
Pork Meat
Products
SEASONAL
OPERATIONS
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No

No
No

OIOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
envlrospHere WATER USE AND WASIEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL IN THE NEAL UNIT 4 AREA
company (SHEET i OF 2)












TABLE
III-B-4


-------



















1
INDUSTRIAL
NAME
PRODUCT, PROCESS OR SERVICE
The Terra Chemical Co . Port Neal. Iowa
Ammonia & Nitric Acid Manufacture
United Packing of Iowa. Sioux Citv. Iowa
Slaughter and Process Hogs
Wilson Frailer. Sioux Citv. lovL\
Livestock Trailer Cleaning
Farmland Industries, Port Neal, Iowa
Soybean Processing


PROCESS

WET
X

X

X



MUNICIPAL
Dakota City Sewage Treatment Plant
Dakota City. Nebraska
Sioux Citv Sewage Treatment Plant
Sioux Citv. Iowa



DRY






X



SOURCE
Wells

2 Wells

Citv Water
Svsiem
Wells

POPULATION






Data Source-
Data collected hv telephone survey and from the
Storet Data Retrieval System of the Optimum Systems
Incorporated. 5272 River Road, Bethesda. Mary and.
dated August 2-4. 19?3


envtrospnere
company
A WVISIOK OF EBASCO SEBvlCES INCOHPORA-ED DATE:
-oo

8S.OOO






AMOUNT
GPM
660

435

%

3000



WATER

TREATED
Stabilisation
Ponds
City Stp

Cttv Sip

No Process
Cooling















DISPOSAL
UNTREATED






Wastewater
Only

PLANT FLOW - GPM




120



12.000





















IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL
WATER USE AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL IN
(SHEET 2 OF 2)














RECEIVING
Missouri

Missouri

Missouri

Missouri









FINAL
PRODUCT
Fertilizer and
Feed
Pork Meat
Products






Livestock Trailer
Cleaning & Maintenance
Soybean Meal

TREATMENT
Holding Tank — Primary

Primary

Designs <






nd Plans for Secondary
Treatment Late '75. Early '^6

















SEASONAL
OPERATIONS
No

No

No

No

RECEIVING










UNIT 4
THE NEAL UNIT 4 AREA

SCALE:













Missouri

Missouri



1





















TABLE
III-B-4

-------
C.  WATER QUALITY AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY

    1.   Overview

    The  aquatic  environment  in  the  region  surrounding   the
proposed Neal Unit U is composed of:

         •  The Missouri River main stem
         •  Missouri River cutoffs
         •  Natural Oxbows

    Neal  Unit H will primarily influence the Missouri River main
stem.  As discussed in detail in Section III-B (hydrology), river
flow in the Missouri River main stem is  controlled  by  upstream
storage  reservoirs  operated  by  the  Corps  of  Engineers.  In
addition to mandating control of upper Missouri River  discharge.
Congressional  legislation  (River  and  Harbor Act of 19U5)  also
called  for  channel  improvements,  or  channelization,  on  the
Missouri  River  and  its tributaries.1,2 Channelization involves
straightening the  natural  meanders,  clearing  the  banks,   and
widening and deepening the channel; thus facilitating containment
of  most  floods  and,  due  to a lowered base level, drainage of
adjacent flood plains.3 The Missouri River has  been  channelized
from its mouth just above St.  Louis,  Missouri, to a point some 52
miles  downstream  of  Gavins  Point Dam.2 Incorporated along its
length are  various  current-directing  and/or  bank  stabilizing
structures,  including  pile dikes, trail dikes, and revetments.1
Examples of these structures are apparent in Exhibit III-C-1.

    Besides the main channel  and  channel  banks,  the  Missouri
River  has  numerous  backwater  areas  along  its  course called
"cutoffs.11 Most of these are "open",  that is they  are  diked  at
their  upper  ends,  and  open  to the river at their lower ends.
Open cutoffs are shallow, horseshoe-shaped waters.* Their  depths
vary  markedly  in  response  to river discharge and they provide
boat access from the river only at times  of  maximum  discharge.
Certain  cutoffs  have  been closed at their lower ends, and fish
management programs have been undertaken in them.*.

    In the Sioux City area there are three principal  sources  of
waste  discharges  into  the  Missouri  River:  domestic  wastes;
industrial wastes associated with food processing  (meat  packing
in  particular); and wastes from ammonium nitrate and insecticide
manufacturing plants.5 All wastes discharged to  the  Sioux  City
municipal  sanitary  sewer  system  had  been  receiving  primary
treatment since 1970.5 There are six major waste water outlets in
the Sioux City area5.  These are associated with:
                                  111-19

-------
       c
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
  IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co, - NEAL UNIT  4
     AERIAL  VIEW OF  THE MISSOURI RIVER

             AT PORT NEAL, IOWA
                                  EXHIBIT

                                  III-C-i
DATE:
SCALE:



111-20

-------
         •    A packing plant in Dakota City, Nebraska
         •    The Sioux  City  municipal  waste  water  treatment
              plant
         «    The effluent from chemical plant detention ponds at
              Port Neal
         «    Three major stockyards in Sioux City  each  with  a
              separate discharge.

    In  addition to point-source discharges* nonpoint sources and
land-runoff are also responsible for significant waste input into
the Missouri River.  Comparison between Environmental  Protection
Agency   (EPA)   data   from  two-day,  wet-weather  surveys  and
eight-day, dry-weather surveys, indicate fecal coliform increases
of several orders of magnitude during the  former  period.5  Such
two-to-three  day  runoff  peaks, as indicated on hydrographs for
Missouri River tributaries, occur about a dozen times a  year  on
the average.

    Basically, organic materials, containing bacteria and viruses
are  discharged  into  the Missouri River.  Fecal coliform counts
are generally in excess of State of Iowa Water Quality  Standards
of  less  than  2000  organisms/100  ml   (February 12, 1974).  In
addition, persistence of a fecal sterol,  coprostanol,  confirmed
the  presence  of  relatively fresh animal excreta in the river.5
Coprostanol is one of the principal sterols in the feces  of  man
and  other  higher  animals -  reportedly the only sources of the
compound.6 Salmonella a pathogenic group of  bacteria,  has  been
isolated   from  Missouri  River  water.   Additionally,  organic
contamination of channel catfish held captive in cages  at  Sioux
City has been indicated by taste panel studies.

    The   EPA,5  in  summary,  stated  that  the  Missouri  River
represented a potential hazard to anyone using it as a source  of
drinking  water or recreation.  It could, however, be restored to
a relatively clean river through implementation of existing waste
water treatment technology.

    Ecologically,  the  Missouri  River  provides  a  variety  of
habitats.  However,  the  amount  of  productive habitat has been
significantly  reduced  by   channelization   over   the   years.
Estimated  losses,  due  to channelization, of Missouri main stem
and/or tributary habitat range from 67  percent  of  the  benthie
area2  to  95  percent  of  the  "aquatic  habitat'1.8  Gould  and
Schmulbach7, found almost twice as many fish in the unchannelized
portions of the Missouri River as in  the  channelized  portions.
Recreational   fishing   pressure   reflects  these  differences.
Green19, found that the annual fishing pressure on the portion of
the Missouri River  which  includes  the  Neal  4  site  was  901
hr/mile/year.   The  upstream unchannelized portions of the river
received 1,218 hr/mile/year while  the  Gavin's  Point  Dam  tail
waters   received  33,886  hr/mile/year.   These  values  can  be
compared to those reported by Green19 for other rivers, including
the Mississippi  (8,811  hr/mile/year)  the  Des  Moines   (10,U1^
hr/mile/year)  and  the  Platte  (4,439 hr/mile/year). Still, the
                                  111-21

-------
Missouri  River  below  Sioux  City  supports  a   characteristic
assemblage  of  fish species, which have been recruited primarily
from upstream (unchannelized)  areas,  wing  dike  habitats,  and
cutoffs.

    The  main  channel  and  channel border of rivers such as the
Missouri have fish communities composed of channel  and  flathead
catfish,  carp, smallmouth and bigmouth buffalo, carpsuckers, and
freshwater drum.10 These communities differ little from those  of
large  prairie  streams, in which, quoting Funk,»o the "catfish -
carp -carpsucker community is prevalent in all but  the  smallest
... (low-gradient) streams." Other game species in this community
include  sauqer,  crappie,  bullhead,  white bass, northern pike,
bluegill, and paddlefish.* Carp, drum, goldeye, and  channel  cat
were  the  fish  most  frequently taken by sport fisherman19, and
they, as well as flathead catfish, buffalo, and suckers,  support
a  very  modest  commerial fishery in the Missouri River.  Forage
species include tiie gizzard shad,  various  chubs,  shiners,  and
minnows.

    Table  III-C-1 presents commercial fishery landings for 1972-
1975 from Iowa boundary waters of the Missouri River.  Spinner ll
considered the fishery  "insignificant",  as  contrasted  to  the
Mississippi  Fiver,  and  attributed  low  catches of fish in the
Missouri Fiver to stream channelization.  As an indication of the
magnitude of the fishery, in 1972 there were 400 linear  feet  of
gill  net  and 11,000 linear feet of trammel net licensed for use
in the Missouri River. By contrast, over 250,000 combined  linear
feet  of these gear were licensed for use in Iowa boundary waters
of the Mississippi River.1* Numbers of hoop and slat nets in  use
on  the  Missouri  and  Mississippi Rivers bordering Iowa in 1972
were  94  and  8845,  respectively.   Missouri  River  commercial
fisheries  accounted  for  an  estimated $4,283.88  in 1972, while
Mississippi River fisheries were  valued  at  $442,162.56.*l  The
total  annual  recreational value of the fishery from the Gavin's
Point Dam to Rulo, Nebraska has been estimated at $619,000.19

    2.   Site Specific Ecological Data

    Since July, 1971,  Iowa  Public  Service  Company   (IPS)  has
sponsored  a  detailed  pre-  and  post-operational  study of the
Missouri River aquatic ecology in the vicinity of  Neal  Unit  3,
located  about  1.8  miles  up-river  from  the Neal Unit 4 site.
Briefly,  the  program  has  involved  collecting  and  analyzing
bi-monthly  water  quality grab samples, and identifying biologic
populations and communities along the river.   The  methodologies
employed   in   the  program  are  summarized  in  the  following
paragraphs.  A more detailed description  of  procedures  can  be
found in Appendix A III-C.  Water quality analyses were performed
according  to methods and procedures outlined in Standard Methods
for The Examination of Water and Waste Mater.*z

    The  biotic  communities  studied   included   phytoplankton,
periphyton,  macrophyte,  zooplankton, benthic macroinvertetrate.
                                   111-22

-------
                                                   Harvest
                          Species
                                                  (Ibs/Round)
                                        1972     1973     1974     1975
                                                                                   Avg Price/lb
                                                                          1972
                                                                                   1973
                                                                                           1974
                                                                                                    1975
                                                                                                             1972
                                                                                           ($)
                                                                                      1973      1974
                                                                                                                                       1975
                      Carp
       17,038    24,510   15,502    17,689    0.05
                                                                                  0.06
                                                                                           0.05
                                                                                                   0.05
                          851.90  1,470.60   775.00    bd4.45
                      Buffalo
                        Sr:allr.iOuth
                        Black
                                       3,693   10,088    6,432     8,742     0.15
                                                                                  0.15
                                                                                           0.16
                                                                                                    0.22
                                                                             553.95  1,513.20   1,029.00  1,923.24
                      Catfish
                        Channel
                        Flathead
4.SS3     6,419
1,485     2,683
5,186     5,734
2,984     2,444
                                          0.35
                                          0.35
0.46
0.46
0.45
0.45
0.49
0.49
                                         916
                                                  965    1,243    1,701
                                                                          3.08
                                                                                  0.10     0.10      0.11
                      Sturgeon Sand
                                         147
                                                   97
                                                          323
                                                                          0.35     0.41     0.35      0.32
                                        7,375    7,946    6,942     3,339     0.05     0.04     0.05
                                                                                                    0.05
                      Others
                        Xoor.eye
                        Goidcye
                        Shad
                                         330
                                                  412
                                                          784
                                                                    40     0.04
                                                                                  0.02
                                                                                           0.03      0.03
                                                                                                             13.20      8.24    24.00    12.00
                      Bullhead
                          TOTAL
                                       36,821   54,355    40,508   41,891
                                                                                                           4,283.88  7,819.57  6,226.00  7,631.05
                      undressed

                      Source: Spinner —
           o
     envirosphere
        company
_A DIVISION Of EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                           IOWA  PUBLIC  SERVICE COMPANY -  NEAL UNIT  4
                    COMMERCIAL LANDINGS  IN  IOWA BOUNDARY WATERS  OF THE
                                  MISSOURI RIVER  (1972-1975)
DATE:
                    SCALE:
                                                                 TABLE

                                                                III-C-1

-------
and fish.   Phytoplankton samples were collected by filtering five
gallons of river water  through  a  Wisconsin  Net  (No.  20,76  u
mesh).   Zooplankton  in  the  June 1973 - December 1975 sampling
period were identified from phytoplankton and drift net  studies.
However,  in  the June 1975 - August 1975 study, zooplankton were
also collected by towing a metered Wisconsin plankton net so that
150 liters passed through the net.  Organisms were identified  to
lowest   possible   taxon  in  replicate  samples  mounted  in  a
Sedgewick-Rafter  cell.   A  drift  net  was   used   to   sample
invertebrate  drift; and a series of artificial substrate baskets
was  used  to  collect  benthic  macroinvertebrates.    Quarterly
fisheries   surveys   were   conducted  using  AC  electrofishing
apparatus, seine nets  and  gill  nets,  as  conditions  allowed.
Larval fishes were sampled with Wildco stream drift nets.

    From July 1971 through April 1973, water quality and plankton
samples were taken along three transects (Exhibit III-C-2) :

         •    Transect I - 14,100 feet (2.67  miles)  below  Neal
              Units 10-3;
         •    Transect II  - 3,000 feet below Neal Units 1-3;
         •    Transect III - 1,380 feet above Neal Units 1-3.

    Since then, a new series of eight stations,  spaced  linearly
along  the Iowa shore of the Missouri river, has been established
for these purposes  (Exhibit  III-C-3).   Transect I  was  located
5,700  feet below the proposed Neal Unit 4, whereas. Station 1 of
the new series of stations is approximately 4,785 feet above  the
Neal Unit 4 site.  Artificial substrate stations are located from
Browers  Bend   (just  above  Neal Units 1-3) to Snyder Bend  (just
below Neal Unit 4), and fisheries seining stations extend to Unit
4.  Data taken from the stretch of the Missouri River from Brower
Bend to Snyder Bend are considered representative to evaluate the
proposed Neal station expansion.

    Data presented here are essentially restricted to a  nineteen
month period from May 1973 to December 1975.  This corresponds to
the  time when new stations were designated for water quality and
plankton monitoring.  However,  limited  use  is  made  of  water
quality  data  gathered  at  Transect I, from August 1971 through
April 1973.  Fisheries  data  are  included  in  their  entirety.
Detailed  data  tabulations  for  Transects I-III, and additional
benthic invertebrate  (substrate) data are given  by  Baldwin  and
Hey13 and Hey and Baldwin14

         a.   Water Quality

    The 1973-1974 monitoring program documented bimonthly changes
in  temperature,   dissolved   oxygen    (DO),   pH,   total   and
orthophosphate,  ammonia  nitrogen,  nitrate  nitrogen,  chemical
oxygen demand  (COD), turbidity, and total,  dissolved,  suspended,
and  volatile solids.  In addition, total and fecal coliform, and
fecal streptococci were measured at monthly  intervals.   In the
following discussion only data collected at Stations 1 and 6  (see
                                   111-24

-------
                                            GEORGE NEAL STATIONS 1-3
                                                              Proposed George Neal


                                                             'Unit 4
       c
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. -  NEAL UNIT 4
 WATER QUALITY AND PLANKTON SAMPLING

     STATIONS, JULY 1971 - APRIL 1973
                      DATE:
            SCALE;



            111-25
EXHIBIT

III-C-2

-------
                                               GEORGE NEAL STATIONS I-3
 LOCATION

 I.- 3000 FEET DOWNSTREAM  FROM NFAL 1-3
   AND 10 FEET  OFFSHORE

 2.-700 FEET  DOWNSTREAM AND 10 FEET
   OFFSHORE.

 3.-80 FEET DOWNSTREAM AND 10 FEET
   OFFSHORE.

 4.- NEAL 1-3 OUTFLOW.

 8.- NEAL 1-3 INTAKE.

 6.- 200 FEET  ABOVE NEAL 1-3 AND 10 FEET
   OFFSHORE.

 7- TERRA  CHEMICAL OUTFLOW.

 8.-S40FEET ABOVE TERRA CHEMICAL
   AND  10 FEET OFFSHORE.
                                                                 Proposed  George Neal

                                                                 Unit 4
       e
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
 IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE  Co. - NEAL  UNIT 4
        WATER  QUALITY AND PLANKTON
   SAMPLING STATIONS. MAY 1973 - PRESENT
DATE:
SCALE:

111-26
                                    EXHIBIT
                                    IU-C-3

-------
Exhibit  III-C-3) ,  will  be  considered.   Station  1 is located
approximately  3000  feet  downstream  from  Neal  Unit   3   and
represents ambient conditions for Neal Unit 4.

    As  water  quality  at Station 1 is influenced by inputs from
the Port Neal Industrial arear a statistical comparison was  made
between Stations 1 and 8 to determine if the Missouri River water
quality  is  being  affected  by  these  inputs.  The results are
summarized in Table III-C-2.

    The comparisons were made using the "t" statistic as  applied
to  paired variables.  This technique substantially increases the
sensitivity of the test in that eliminates the large  variability
in  the  raw data resulting from seasonal and short-term effects,
e.g. flow.  To be strictly valid, the samples would have to  have
been  obtained allowing for the time travel between stations.  As
this was not done, the statistical analysis should be interpreted
as only indicating possible differences  between  stations.   The
levels  of  ammonia,  nitrogen,  total solids and chemical oxygen
demand (COD)  were significantly greater  at  Station  1  than  at
Station  8.   The  increases most probably result from discharges
from Station 7.  They  were  observed  to  have  high  levels  of
ammonia-nitrogen,  up to 200 mg/1; IDS, up to 4000 mg/1; and COD,
up to 240 mg/1.  Phosphate was significantly greater  at  Station
8; the reason not apparent.

              i.   Existing Water Quality - Neal Unit 4

    Station 1 was  selected  as  best  representing  tne  ambient
conditions  for  Neal  Unit  4.  The result of two years of water
quality sampling and analysis is summarized in Table III-C-3  and
discussed in detail in the following sections.
    The  pH levels observed during the study period are presented
in Exhibit III-C-4.  Most of the samples were slightly  alkaline,
in  the  pH range 8.2 to 8.8. The relatively low pHs, 7.6 to 8.0,
recorded during the colder months, November  1973  through  April
1974,  most  probably  resulted from subsurface releases from the
Gavins Point dam.  These  releases  would  be  expected  to  have
rather  high  CO2  concentrations,  which  would  depress  the pH
levels.

    Alkalinity and Hardness

    As shown in Table III-C-3, alkalinity and hardness levels  in
the Missouri River are high.  The mean total alkalinity and total
hardness concentrations were 167 and 250 mg/1, respectively.
                                  111-27

-------
                                        Standard         Confidence
   Parameter      Mean Difference      Deviation          Interval
                       (1-8)                                (95%)
pH (Std Units)         0.005             0.131          +/-0.034
Dissolved Oxy-        -0.085             0.346          +/-0.104
gen (mg/1)
   Nutrients
                           -i-
Ortho-Phosphate       -0.02"             0.010          +/-0.003
(mg/1)
Total Phosphate        0.005             0.020          +/-0.006
(mg/1)
Ammonia (mg/l-N)       0.116"            0.209          +/-0.063
Nitrate (mg/l-N)      -0.001             0.122          +/-0.037
    Solids
Total (mg/1)           9.50"            18.9            +/-S.76
Total Suspended        8.45             32.0            +/-9.7S
(mg/1)
Dissolved (mg/1)       5.66             20.6            +/-6.26
Total Volatile         1.04             17.6            +/-S.38
(mg/D
Turbidity (FTU)       -1.81              6.21           +/-1.87
Chemical Oxy-              ,v
gen Demand  (mg/1)      1.86'             5.12           +/-1.56
 The difference between stations is significant at  the  95 percent
 confidence level.
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
A COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY AT
STATIONS 1 AND 8
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
III-C-2
                             111-28

-------
(mg/D
Percent Satura-
tion
Alkalinity (mg/1)
  Total
  Phenolphth-
    aleine
Total Hardness
(mg/1)
BOD
Total Iron
Nutrients
  Ortho - PO, (mg/1)
  Total - P04 (mg/1)
  NH3 - N (mg/1)
  N03 - N (mg/1)
Solids
  Total (mg/1)
Min
7.6
-1.0
6.9
84
148
0
196
1.4
1.09
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.06
Max
9.0
26.8
15.4
122
188
12
304
9.0
31.7
0.11
0.14
1.50
1.14
491
691
 98

167
  3.7

250

  4.2
  5.7

  0.032
  0.050
  0.236
  0.327

549
 5.6

12.3
 4.0

23.6

 2.8
 9.8

 0.022
 0.031
 0.270
 0.296

32.9
c
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
SUMMARY OF WATER QUALITY AT

DATE:
- NEAL UNIT 4
STATION 1
SCALE:
TABLE
III-C-3

-------
OJ
o
                   Parameter
  Total suspended
  (rag/1)
  Dissolved (mg/1)
  Total Volatile
  (mg/1)
Turbidity  (FTU)
COD (mg/1)
                                 Range
                                        Min
                                           Max
                                 11

                                432
                                 42
                                        9
                                        5.6
130

613
150

 39
 56.5
                                                                      Mean
 55.3

493
 69.7

 23.9
 13.2
                                     Standard
                                    Deviation
18.1

28.3
16.9

 8.1
 6.8
    o
envirosphere
  company
                         DATE:
                                     IOWA  PUBLIC  SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
                                             SUMMARY OF WATER QUALITY AT STATION 1
                                                           SCALE:
                                                                                           TABLE
                                                                                          III-C-3
                                                                                          (cont'd)

-------
9  .  0
e
envirosphere
company
» OiViSiON Of EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
SEMI-MONTHLY LEVELS OF pH
DATE:
AT STATIC N 1
SCAIE:
EXHIBIT
III-C-4

-------
    Iron

    The concentrations of total iron reported are rather high for
a  surface  water,  up  to  32 mg/1 with a mean of 5.7.  The iron
content is most probably associated with  suspended  sediment  in
the form of Fe2(OH)3.

    Dissolved Oxygen

    Dissolved oxygen (DO) levels at Station 1 are relatively high
and  exhibit the normal seasonal variation for DO concentrations,
as shown in Exhibit Ill-c-5.  Because of the  seasonal  variation
in  DO concentrations, the percent saturation is generally a more
useful parameter for assessing the oxygen regimen  of  a  stream.
As  shown in Exhibit III-c-5 the percent DO saturation levels are
satisfactory.   The  seasonal  variation  in  saturation   levels
results  from the higher rates of Biological Oxygen Demand  (BOD),
Nitrification Oxygen Demand  (NOD),  and  benthal  oxygen  demand
during   the   warmer  months.   Several  observations  exceeding
saturation were noted during the colder months.   This  may  have
resulted from the entrapment of small air bubbles, resulting from
the highly turbulent flow of the Missouri River.

    Temperature

    Temperature   variation   is   given   in   Exhibit  III-C-6.
Temperatures showed the normal seasonal variation, with  maximums
occuring  during  July and August and minimums during January and
February.  During the two-year study, the average temperature was
12.3° C with a maximum of 26.8° C and a minimum of -1° C.

    Nutrients

    The levels of ammonia and nitrate nitrogen,  and  phosphates,
both  total  and  ortho, were determined at semimonthly intervals
over  the   study   period.    Exhibit   III-C-7   presents   the
concentrations  of  NH3-N,  NO3-N  and  total  PO4  at Station 1.
Nutrient levels exhibited  seasonal  fluctuations,  with  minimum
levels  observed  during the late summer, July through September.
During the winter months the nutrient levels remained  relatively
constant;  sharp  increases  in nutrient levels were noted during
the spring.

    The decreased nutrient levels during the summer most probably
result from  increased  biological  activity,  especially  algae,
while  sharp  increases  in  the  spring probably result from the
application of fertilizers during the planting season.

    Solids and Turbidity

    Suspended solids concentration  in  the  Missouri  River  are
moderately  high,  a mean of 55.3 mg/1, as would be expected of a
rapidly flowing, highly  turbulent  river.   In  general,  levels
tended  to  be  somewhat  lower  during the low flow stages, non-
                                  111-32

-------
                                                                                                              — —— ——   LiSSOLVtD  OXYGEN
                                                                                                              	   PERCENT SATURATION
130
120
I 00
 9 0
 80
                                                                                                                                              •»  I 6
envirosphere
company
* DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCOBPORMFD
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
SEMI-MDNTHLY I£VELS OF DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND
PERCENT SATURATION AT STATION 1
DATE: SCALE:
EXHIBIT
III-C-5

-------

envirospnere
company

IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
SEMI-MONTHLY LEVELS OF TEMPERATURE AT STATION 1
DATE: SCALE:
EXHIBIT
tII-C-6


-------
2.0
                                                                                                                    AMMONIA -N  mg/l
                                                                                                                    NITRATE  -Nmg/l
                                                                                                                    TOTAL  PHOSPHATE mg/lx10

envirosphere
company
, 3IV,-,,ON OF iBASCC MIVi;!, ,N,;-i- -l.A',0,
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY -
SEMI-MONTHLY NUTRIENT LEVE
DATE:
NEAL UNIT 4
L S AT S TAT ION 1
SCALE:
EXHIBIT
11I-C-7


-------
navigation season, with maximum levels associated  with  rainfall
events.   Turbidity  levels  generally  paralleled  the suspended
solids.  The average turbidity at Station  1  was  23.9  Formazin
Turbidity Units (equivalent to Jackson Turbidity Units) .

    Total  dissolved  solids levels remained relatively constant,
varying between UOO and 600 mg/1.

    Chemical Oxygen Demand
    The COD levels at Station 1 varied between 5.6 and 56.5  mg/1
with a mean of 13.2 mg/1.  The COD levels measured are typical of
a slightly polluted environment.

    Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD^

    BOD  levels with a mean of 4.2 are characteristic of slightly
polluted streams.   The  mean  COD  to  BOD  ratio  is  3:1,  and
indicates  the  organic  pollutants  in  the  stream  are readily
degradable.

    Bacterial Indicators of Pollution

    Table III-C-4  summarizes  the  total  coliform  (TC) ,  fecal
coliform   (FC) ,  fecal  streptococci  (FS) ,  and FC/FS ratio from
Station 1.  The means presented are geometric means, (X1 • X2 ...
Xn) 1/n.  FC counts were high at Station 1,  the  mean  number  per
100  ml  exceeds the Iowa water quality criteria for the Missouri
River by a factor greater than two.

              ii.  Summary

    The water quality in the vicinity of the Neal station remains
rather high considering the substantial  pollutional  loads  from
the  Sioux City area, both sewage and stockyard wastes.  The high
flow rates, flow velocity, and resulting  turbulence  combine  to
provide  the  Missouri  River with an extremely high capacity for
self purification.  This is evidenced by  high  dissolved  oxygen
percent saturation levels even with substantial BOD loadings from
the Sioux City region.

    From   a   water  quality  standpoint  the  most  significant
consideration for the Missouri below Sioux city is  the  high  FC
and  FS  levels  which results from the discharge of inadequately
treated sewage and animal wastes.  The  high  levels  indicate  a
potentially serious health hazard to swimmers in water bodies fed
from the Missouri.

         b.   Algae

    Detailed data of abundance and distribution of  phytoplankton
genera  found in the vicinity of the George Neal Station Units1-4
from May 1973 through April 1974 and from June 1974  to  December
1975, are presented in Appendix Table A-III-C-1.  Exhibit III-C-8
                                   111-36

-------


Total Co li form
Fecal Coliform
Fecal Strepto-
cocci
FC/FS Ratio
Geometric
Mean
per 100 ml
31,700
4,600
920
5.0
Maximum
per 100 ml
146,000
103,000
17,000
98
Minimum
per 100 ml
2,600
180
140
0.09
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
- MEAL UNIT 4
MONTHLY BACTERIAL COUNTS STATION 1
DATE:
SCALE:
TABLE
III-C-4

-------
         LEGEND.
                    BLUE-GREENS

                  J GREENS
        L
J
                    DIATOMS
        Number above each bar indicates
           abundance in cells/liter
           ! "E" FORMAT - 10' )
            NO DATA
us
GO
G
envirosphere
company
VISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED"1
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
DIVERSITY (NUMBER OF GENERA) AND ABUNDANCE
(NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS) OF PHYTOPLANKTON, STATIONS 1-8
MISSOURI RIVER, IOWA
DATE: SCALE:
                                                                                                                              EXHIBIT

                                                                                                                              III-C-8

-------
represents  a consolidation of the data from May 1973 to February
1974.

    The data indicate an  overwhelming  year-round  dominance  by
diatoms.  The most abundant genera observed during the study were
Asterionella,  dominant  from January or February through June or
July, and  Cyclotella,  usually  dominant  from  July  or  August
through  December  or  January.   However,  in  the  November and
December 1975 samples, Asterionella was  dominant  while  in  the
October 1975 sample Nitzchia was dominant.  Both Asterionella and
Cyclotella  are  euplanktonic.   Other important diatoms included
Fragillaria,  Melosira,  Nitzchia  and  Navicula.   Nitzchia  and
Navicula  are  benthic  and  were  more  abundant at Station 4 on
various dates  (see  Appendix  A-III-C-A) .   Abundance  of  other
benthic  diatoms,  (Diatoma,  Gomphonema,  Synedra)   was  usually
independent of levels of Navicula and  Nitzchia.   Kite  diagrams
showing   temporal   changes  in  the  relative  contribution  of
Asterionella, Cyclotella, Nitzchia, and  Navicula  to  the  total
sample  composition   (May  1973  to  May  1974)  are presented in
Appendix A-III-C-A.

    Green algae reached their peak abundances in late summer 1973
and during June 1974 and June 1975.  Distribution of green  algae
was variable (Exhibit III-C-8).

    Blue-green  algae  were  present in low numbers, usually 2000
cells/liter and were generally  absent  in  plankton  samples  in
winter and early spring.  Blue-greens, as a group, grow optimally
in  higher  temperatures than green algae and diatoms.23 However,
there  appeared  to  be  no  significant  differences  in   their
abundances  among  the stations sampled, although the May 1973 to
May 1974  data  showed  small  increases  in  blue-green  numbers
observed  at  Station  4.   Commonly sampled genera of blue-green
algae   included   Oscillatgria,   Spirulina,    Anacystis    and
Stichosiphon.

    Similarities  and  dissimilarities  in the composition of the
plankton community among the seven  stations  are  apparent  when
faunal  affinity indices are used.  Sanders* 2* index of affinity
was used to produce trellis diagrams for each sampling date  from
May  1973 to April 1974  (Appendix Exhibits A-III-C-1 through 11).
Appendix Exhibits A-III-C-2 and 4 effectively illustrate, with  a
single  number, the sample differences.  The dominance of samples
taken in June at Station 4  by  Navicula  and  Nitzchia,  and  of
samples  taken  in  August,  by  Nitzchia,  is  reflected  in low
similarities between that station and others sampled.  Numbers of
Asterionella and Cyclotella which dominated the other samples  on
a  percentage basis, were approximately the same for all stations
(with the single exception of Asterionella at Station 4, in  June
1973).

    Differences  in  levels  of abundance of key species from May
1973 to February 1974 were also reflected in dendrograms, or tree
diagrams depicting station  similarities.   These  are  shown  in
                                  111-39

-------
Appendix Exhibits A-III-C-12 to 20, and were formed by regrouping
stations  on  the basis of a general similarity coefficient given
by Gower.26 Differences in samples taken at Station 4  stand  out
distinctly  in  Mayf  June,  July,  August  and October (Appendix
Exhibits A-III-C-12 to 15 and 17), when levels of similarity with
respect to other stations were between only 0.30 and  0.40  on  a
scale of 1.00.

    Dendrograms based simply on the presence or absence of genera
convey  yet  a different picture  (Appendix Exhibits A-III-C-21 to
29).   No  consistent  community  patterns  emerge  in   Appendix
Exhibits A-III-C-21 through 28.

    Two qualitative "periphyton" surveys (as they have come to be
called)  were  conducted  in the Port Neal area in 1973.  In June
1973, rocks were sampled upstream and downstream of Neal Units  1
and 2 discharge.  In August 1973, rocks were sampled upstream of,
downstream of, and on the discharge structure.  Results are given
in  Appendix  Tables  A-III-C-A-1  and 2.  Station differences in
green algae were essentially opposite for the two sampling dates,
and the presence of blue-greens at and fcelow  the  discharge  was
noted  in August.  Genera found were comparable to those reported
in  the  Missouri  River  near  Brownville,   Nebraska,21   where
communities  colonizing  glass panels were generally dominated by
Nitzchia and Navicula.

         c.   Macrophytes

    In the channelized sections of the Missouri River, few if any
macrophytes exist  because  of  flow  manipulation  and  shifting
substrate.   However,  in  the  backwater  areas during the lower
river  levels  of  1973  and  1974,  the  relative  abundance  of
Phraqmites comrcunis,  Polygonum and Typha spp. increased.  Sedges
and rushes became more  important,  and  cottonwood  and  willows
established themselves on exposed sandbars.17 In 1975, during the
high river flows, this vegetation was submerged.

         d.   Zoopiankton

    According to phytoplankton and zooplankton samples  collected
in  the  Missouri  River  from June 1973 through December  1975, a
copepod, Cyclops, was the  dominant  animal,  although  Diaptomus
(another  copepod)  and Daphnia  (a cladoceran) occurred regularly
in the summer of 1973.  Daphnia was by  far  the  dominant  genus
collected   in  drift  net  samples.   Organisms  such  as  mites
(Hydracarina) and hydroids  (Hydra) occurred with low,  but  equal
frequency.   Rotifers, which have been described as nearly always
dominating  the  riverine  zooplankton16,  were  notably   absent
(Appendix  Table  A-III-C-1.)   This was probably due to the  fact
that size of the drift net  (243 u) was too large to trap rotifers
(according to Pennakss,  rotifers  range  from   100-500 u  long).
During  June  and July of  1975 when zocplankton samples were  made
by towing a metered  Wisconsin  net  made  of  76 u  mesh  nitex,
samples  included both protozoa and rotifers.  The ten  species of
                                  111-40

-------
9 . 0






8 . 8






8 . 6






8 . 4






8 2






8 . 0






7. 8






7 .6
envirosphere
company
A 0( VISION OF E&ASCO SERVICES INCOBPOBATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
SEMI-MONTHLY LEVELS OF pH AT STATION
1
DATE: SCALE:
EXHIBIT
III-C-4

-------
    Iron

    The concentrations of total iron reported are rather high for
a  surface  water,  up  to  32 mg/1 with a mean of 5.7.  The iron
content is most probably associated with  suspended  sediment  in
the form of Fe2(OH)3.

    Dissolved Oxygen

    Dissolved oxygen (DO) levels at Station 1 are relatively high
and  exhibit the normal seasonal variation for DO concentrations,
as shown in Exhibit IlI-c-5.  Because of the  seasonal  variation
in  DO concentrations, the percent saturation is generally a more
useful parameter for assessing the oxygen regimen  of  a  stream.
As  shown in Exhibit III-c-5 the percent DO saturation levels are
satisfactory.   The  seasonal  variation  in  saturation   levels
results  from the higher rates of Biological Oxygen Demand  (BOD),
Nitrification Oxygen Demand   (NOD),  and  benthal  oxygen  demand
during   the   warmer  months.   Several  observations  exceeding
saturation were noted during the colder months.   This  may  have
resulted from the entrapment of small air bubbles, resulting from
the highly turbulent flow of the Missouri River.

    Temperature

    Temperature   variation   is   given   in   Exhibit  III-C-6.
Temperatures showed the normal seasonal variation, with  maximums
occuring  during  July and August and minimums during January and
February.  During the two-year study, the average temperature was
12.3° C with a maximum of 26.8° C and a minimum of -1° C.

    Nutrients

    The levels of ammonia and nitrate nitrogen,  and  phosphates,
both  total  and  ortho, were determined at semimonthly intervals
over  the   study   period.    Exhibit   III-C-7   presents   the
concentrations  of  NH3-N,  NO3-N  and  total  PO4  at Station 1.
Nutrient levels exhibited  seasonal  fluctuations,  with  minimum
levels  observed  during the late summer, July through September.
During the winter months the nutrient levels remained  relatively
constant;  sharp  increases  in nutrient levels were noted during
the spring.

    The decreased nutrient levels during the summer most probably
result from  increased  biological  activity,  especially  algae,
while  sharp  increases  in  the  spring probably result from the
application of fertilizers during the planting season.

    Solids and Turbidity

    Suspended solids concentration  in  the  Missouri  River  are
moderately  high,  a mean of 55.3 mg/1, as would be expected of a
rapidly flowing, highly  turbulent  river.   In  general,  levels
tended  to  be  somewhat  lower  during the low flow stages, non-
                                  111-32

-------
rotifers collected were evenly distributed  at  the  three  sites
sampled.   Difflugia  was  the most abundant protozoan collected.
Copepods were present in all samples  in  June  1975,  but  their
abundance,  and  that  of  the  rotifers, decreased as the summer
progressed.  The Cladocera were less numerous than the  Copepoda,
and were represented by Bosmina and Daphnia.

         e.   Macroinvertebrates

              i.   Drift

    Drift studies in the Missouri River have  been  conducted  by
Russell*,  Holz33,  and  Morris et al^2.  Dipterans were found by
Holz33  and  Russell*  to  be  the  dominant  insects  near   the
Iowa/South Dakota line.  Hey and Baldwin15, in the present series
of  investigations   (Appendix  Table  A-III-C-2), also found that
Diptera  was  the  most  abundant  order  of  insect   collected.
Ephemeroptera   (mayflies)  and  Diptera  comprised  approximately
equal percentages of the insect drift in  studies  by  Morris  et
al2,  however,  mayflies  were  not abundant in drift at the Port
Neal site.  Morris et aj.2 found greater crustacean biomass in the
drift from unchannelized portions  of  the  Missouri  River,  but
biomass of insects was higher in the drift in channelized areas.

              ii.  Artificial Substrates

    Artificial  substrates were used to collect  macroinvertebrate
samples.   The  data collected in the vicinity of the George Neal
Stations'!-4 during April 1973  to  November  1975  are  given  in
Appendix   Table   A-III-C-3.   Aquatic  macroinvertebrates  have
classically been used as indicators of organic pollution.30,  3S,
3*  The  kinds of invertebrates colonizing substrates in the Port
Neal area of the Missouri River were  generally  the  facultative
and/or  intolerant  groups30,  as  opposed  to the more pollution
tolerant  forms  such  as  tubificids,  and  certain  snails  and
beetles.

    Dominant   macroinvertebrates   at   Port  Neal  were  midges
(Tendipes), caddis flies (order: Trichoptera) ,  mayflies   (order:
Ephemeroptera),  planarians  (phylum:  Turbellaria),  and  hydras
(phylum: Hydrazoa), Nematodes   (roundworms),  stoneflies   (order:
Plecoptera) ,  and  sow  bugs  (Asellus;  class:  Crustacea), were
occasionally abundant,  overall, the class Insecta, and primarily
the orders Trichoptera, Ephemeroptera, and Diptera were dominant.
Their numbers, expressed as medians  over  all  stations  sampled
(Exhibit  III-C-9),  are  presented in Exhibit III-C-10 for April
1973 to October 1973.

    There  was  considerable  variability  in  distribution   and
abundance  of  invertebrates  among  individual  samplers.   This
variability is illustrated in Exhibit  III-C-11   (April  1973  to
October  1973)  for  insects,  as  well as in trellis diagrams of
indices of affinity using all animals sampled (Appendix  Exhibits
A-III-C-30  to  36),  April  1973  to  November  1973.  At times.
                                  HI-41

-------
                                            GEORGE NEAL STATIONS 1-3
                                                6  \ 700'DOWNSTREAM
                                                             ProposedjGeorge Neal



                                                             Unit 4
       e
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
  IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4



 ARTIFICIAL SUBSTRATE SAMPLER STATIONS, 1973
DATE:
SCALE:



111-42
                                  EXHIBIT


                                  III-C-9

-------
    100  <
  v>
  _ 100 <
  a:

  UJ

  m
    100
                                    TRICHOPTERA
                                    EPHEMEROPTE R A
                                                            D I P T E  R A
                  A/M'M/J  ' J/J '  J/A 'A/8  'S/O'O/N

                             EXPOSURE  PERIOD
       e
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION Of EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE  Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
 MONTHLY MEDIAN ABUNDANCE OF TRICHOPTERA
 (CADDISFLIESJ.  EPHEMEROPTERA (MAYFLIESj,
AND DIPTERA  (MIDGES),  OVER ALL ARTIFICIAL
   SUBSTRATE STATIONS,, MISSOURI RIVER,
           IOWA AND NEBRASKA
                      DATE:
             SCALE;

             111-43
EXHIBIT
III-C-10

-------
       NUMBER  OF OMDIVODUAD.S
               J  i < 100
               J  100 <: 250
               J  250 < 500

                  > 500
       -g
       5
                                                                                          NO  DATA
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASC^ SERVICES INCORPORATED
                                    IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
   C'VERSITY (NUMBER OF FAMILIES! AND ABUNDANCE (NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS)
         OF AQUATIC INSECTS  COLLECTED ON ARTIFICIAL  SUBSTRATES
   	MISSOURI RIVER.  IOWA	
DATE:
SCALE:
                               EXHIBIT
                               III-C-11

-------
abundance of insects was higher downstream (Stations 1, 2,  3  and
22,  23,  24)   than  upstream  (Exhibit  III-C-11).    However,  no
consistent patterns emerged, and the data failed  to  indicate  a
deleterious effect on aquatic insect communities due to operation
of  Neal  Units 1 and 2 (primarily thermal, see Table III-C-5 for
example).  Upon closer inspection of data given in Appendix Table
A-III-C-3, certain trends however do, appear; i.e.,  caddis  flies
and  mayflies  were  often  more  abundant in semiprotected areas
along the Nebraska shore (Stations 16, 17, 18, and  22,  23,  24)
than  they  were on the Iowa shore.  Also, the crustacean Asellus
(sow bug) had a tendency to be more abundant at  Stations  13  to
15,  compared  to other stations on the Iowa site.  Other animals
showed wide spatial variability.  The correlation  between  drift
organisms  and organisms populating artificial substrates was not
obvious, although Diptera were commonly numerous in both sets  of
samples.

         f.   Fish

    Fish species indigenous  to  the  Missouri  River  have  been
described  in  a  general  way in Section III-C-1, and commercial
data  for  1972-1975  have  been  presented.   The  community  is
dominated  by  catfish,  carp,  and  carpsucker  with  additional
species such as northern pike, sauger, buffalo, gizzard shad, and
others enhancing the diversity of the system.  Channelization has
been cited as the major cause of decreased  productivity  in  the
Missouri  River.   Existing  species are dependent upon wing dike
habitats, upstream areas (in particular below  the  Gavins  Point
Dam), cutoffs, and seasonally-inundated flood plains for spawning
and recruitment.

    Often,  spawning of riverine fish is accompanied by a general
upstream movement,, and significant losses to  populations  within
the  normal  adult  "home  range" are thus averted.16 This may be
true of carp, carpsuckers, catfish, minnows, and others, although
specific data are not available.  Sauger  may  move  upstream  to
spawn  in  the  vicinity of Gavins Point Dam, and some sauger are
probably recruited from Lewis and Clark  Lake  above  the  dam.38
Recruitment  from  Lewis  and Clark Lake may also be expected for
carp, carpsucker, channel catfish, freshwater drum, walleye,  and
shiners.38  Intrastream  movements  may  also  normally occur for
reasons other than spawning.   For  example,  up  and  downstream
movement  of  channel  catfish has been well documented39, *°, 41
and it has been suggested that at any given time  both  sedentary
and mobile groups may exist within the population.16

    Abundance  of fishes in the Missouri River was studied by bag
seining,  electrofishing,  trammel  netting,  and  gill  netting.
Common  and  scientific  names  of fish species collected at Port
Neal, are  given  in  Table  III-C-6.   Carp,  river  carpsucker,
goldeye  and  gizzard  shad were the most common species found in
the greatest numbers an all habitats present in the study area.
                                  111-45

-------


Depth
Surface

1'

2'

5'

LO1






Sampling Sites:
#1 #2 #3 #6 08

83.1 82.8 86.0 82.4 82.0
(1.1) ( .8) (4.0) ( .4) (0.0)
82.8 83.3 86.7 82.2 81.7
( .8) (1.3) (4.7) ( .2) -( .3)
82.8 83.3 86.0 82.2 82.0
( .8) (1.3) (4.0) ( .2) (0.0)
82.9 83.5 85.8 82.2 82.0
( .9) (1.5) (3.8) ( .2) (0.0)
82.8 83.5 84.6 82.0* 82.0**
( .8) (1.5) (2.6) (0.0) (0.0)
* depth at bottom 8.8'
** depth at bottom 9.0'
Note: ambient river temperature determined at
4:00 p.m. prior to sampling site-
thermal profiles « 82.0°F
Location of Sampling Sites Used in Preoperational Study for Neal III
1 3000 feet
downstream from George Neal Station and 10 feet out from
shore (same as old Site II-Iowa)
2 700 feet
downstream from George Neal Station and 10 feet out from
shore (same as Site II-A)
3 80 feet downstream from George Neal Station and 10 feet out from shore
6 200 feet
upstream from George Neal Station and 10 feet out from shore
8 approximately 400 feet upstream from the Terra Chemical outflow
and 10 feet out from shore
4 Neal Station outflow - not included here
5 Neal Station intake - not included here
e
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
THERMAL PROFILES TABLE
SAMPLING SITES (° F) - JULY 12, 1973
DATE: SCALE:
111-46

-------
                     Common  Name



               Bigmouth buffalo


               Black   bullhead


               Black  crappie


               Bluegill


               Blue sucker


               Bullhead Minnow


               Burbot


               Carp


               Carpsucker


               Channel  catfish


               Flathead catfish


               Flathead chub


               Freshwater drum


               Gizzard  shad


               Goldeye


               Green  sunfish


               Johnny darter


               Largemouth bass


               Longnose gar


               Minnows


               Mirror carp


               Mooneye


               Northern pike


               Orangespotted sunfish


               Pallid sturgeon


               Plains flathead chub
                                Scientific Name



                           Ictiobus cyprinellus


                           Ictaluras melas


                           Pomoxis nigromaculatus


                           Lempomis marochirus


                           Cycleptus elongatus


                           Pimephales vigilax


                           Lota lota


                           Cyprinus carpio


                           Carpiodes carpio


                           Ictalurus punctatus


                           Pylodictus olivaris


                           Hybopsis gracilis


                           Aplodinotus grunniens


                           Dorosoma cepedianum


                           Hiodon alosoides


                           Lepomis cyanellus


                           Etheostoma nigrum


                           Micropterus salmoides


                           Lepisosteus osseus


                           Notropis spp.


                           Cyprinus carpio


                           Hiodon tergisus


                           Esox lucius


                           Lepomis humilus


                           Scaphirhynchus  album


                           Hybopsis gracilis
   envlrosphere
     company
A DIVISION Of EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                           IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. - NEAL UNIT 4
       COMMON AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES  OF
    FISH COLLECTED IN THE PORT NEAL AREA
  OF THE MISSOURI RIVER AND ITS BACKWATERS
               (SHEET 1 OF 2)
DATE:
SCALE:

111-47
                                      TABLE
                                     III-C-6

-------
                Common Name



             Pumpkinseed


             River Carpsucker


             River redhorse


             Sauger


             Shorthead redhorse


             Shortnose gar


             Shovelnose sturgeon


             Skipjack herring


             Smallmouth bass


             Smallmouth buffalo


             Stonecat


             Walleye


             White bass


             White  crappie


             White sucker


             Yellow perch
                          Scientific Name




                       Lepomis gibbosus


                       Carpiodes carpio


                       Moxostoma carinatum


                       Stizostedion canadense


                       Moxostoma macrotepidotum


                       Lepisosteus platostomus


                       Scaphirhynchus platyorynchus


                       Alosa chrysochloris


                       Micropterus  dolomieui


                       Ictiobus bubalus


                       Noturus flavus


                       Stizostedion vitreum vitreum


                       Morone chrysops


                       Pomoxis annularis


                       Catostomus commersoni


                       Perca flavescens
        o
   envirosphere
     company
«. DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
  IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE CO.  - NEAL UNIT 4
     COMMON AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES OF
  FISH COLLECTED IN THE PORT NEAL AREA
OF THE MISSOURI RIVER AND ITS BACKWATERS
             (SHEET 2 OF 2)
                        DATE:
             SCALE:

             111-48
 TABLE
III-C-6

(Cont'd)

-------
    Fish species were collected in varying life  history  stages,
depending  on  the  habitat  sampled  and  gear selectivity.  For
example, bluegills, minnows, johnny darters, crappies, largemouth
bass and yellow perch were  only  collected  by  bag  seining  in
backwater  areas   (Exhibit  III-O12).   Most of these, and other
species collected by seining, were young-of-the-year  individuals
(Appendix Table A-III-C-4).

    Electrofishing  was  the  most  successful  sampling  method,
although it is apparently not effective on channel catfish32, *2.
The presence of  channel  catfish  was  indicated  by  commercial
fisheries data (Section III-C-1) and Neal Units 1,2 and 3 intake
screen impingement data (Section IV-B).  A summary of trammel and
gill  net  data  for  1971-1975  is  given  in Table III-C-7, and
electrofishing data for areas above and below the present Neal  1
and  2  discharge are given in Table III-C-8.  Gammon42 has shown
that carp, carpsucker, and buffalo are attracted  to  warm  water
discharge  in  the  Wabash  River,  Indiana,  and  a trend toward
increased abundance of carp and carpsucker and  total  number  of
species in the discharge plume of Neal 1 and 2 has been observed.

    The  most  productive  backwaters  were  sites, D, E, J and K
although sites D and F are apparently being  filled  by  riparian
owners.   In  fact,  all  sites are subject to year-to-year river
level fluctuations and  often  winterkill.   Sites  F  and  J  in
Nebraska,  for  example,  experienced  an extensive winterkill in
1973 resulting in the death of many carp,  carpsucker,  bullhead,
freshwater drum, crayfish, and frogs.is

    Eggs  arid  larvae  of the various fish species inhabiting the
Missouri River were taken in drift net  samples  and  entrainment
(by Neal Units 1 and 2) samples in 1973, 1974, and 1975.

    Of  1487  larvae  taken in drift and entrainment samples from
May through August 1974, 79 percent were drum;  20  percent  were
minnows;  and  1  percent remained unidentified.  Of 1,001 larvae
collected  from  May  through  August  1975,  42   percent   were
freshwater  drum  and 57 percent were minnows (Tables III-C-9 and
10).

    In comparison of data presented in the  Environmental  Report
for  the  Fort  Calhoun  Unit   1 nuclear station located about 65
miles to the south of Neal Unit 4, to the data  provided  herein,
differences   in  numbers  of  fish  collected  are  significant.
Available literature19,  substantiates  these  results.   Green19
divided  the  portion  of the Missouri River he studied into four
sections.  Of these. Section II extends from Sioux City, Iowa  to
Blair,  Nebraska  and includes the Neal 4 plat site.  Section III
extends from Blair,  Nebraska  to  Nebraska  City,  Nebraska  and
contains  the  Ft  Calhoun  plant  site.  Section IV extends from
Nebraska City, Nebraska to Rulo, Nebraska.  He states  that  "all
channelized  river sections are not alike because of effects man-
made structures have had upon the river.  For example. Section II
had more oxbow lakes with functional  connections  to  the  river
                                  111-49

-------
                                            GEORGE NEAL UNITS l-3i
                                                             Proposed George Neal

                                                             Unit 4
       o
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
  IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
       FISHERIES BACKWATER AND SHORELINE
                  SEINING AREAS
                  (A THROUGH  K)
DATE:
SCALE:

111-50
                                  EXHIBIT
                                  III-C-12

-------
                            October 1971
               (2 Trammel Nets - Each  Set  for  6  Hours)

                  Species	        Number  Caught
           Goldeye                             2
           Gizzard Shad                        1
           Northern Pike                       2
           Carp                                9
           Channel Catfish                     1
           Carpsuckers                        30
           Shortnose Gar                       2
                                              47  Total
                              May 1972
                    (1 Gill Net - Set for 3 Hours)
                  Species
Number Caught
           Goldeye
           Carpsuckers
           Yellow Perch
           Northern Redhorse
           Carp
                              June 1972
     10
     21
      1
      1
     _2
     35 Total
                    (1 Gill Net - Set for 3 Hours)

                  Species	         Number Caught
           Carpsuckers                         4
           Shortnose Gar                       j.
                                               5 Total
                             August 1972
      (3 Gill Nets - 2 Set for 3 Hours Each,  1 Set for 17 Hours
2 Trammel Nets - 1 Set Overnight, 1 Set and Fish were Driven Into It)
                  Species
           Crappie
           Gizzard Shad
           Goldeye
           Sauger
           Shortnose Gar
           Carpsucker
           Channel Catfish
           Bigmouth
Number Caught
G
5
9
3
2
6
T

1



                                        25
           30
            1
           _1
           33 Totals
                          13/
     ,147
           Baldwin and Hey^— and Hey and Baldwin—'
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OE EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
SUMMARY OF MISSOURI RIVER TRAMMEL AND GILL
NET DATA, 1971-1975
(SHEET 1 OF 3)
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
III-C-7
                             111-51

-------
                                     April  1973
               (1 Gill Net - Set Overnight; 1 Trammel Net Set Overnight)
                          Species
                   Redhorse
                   Shortnose Gar
                   Goldeye
                   Channel Catfish
                   Carp
                         Number Caught
                         2
                         1
                         2
                                     August 1973
                            (1 Trammel Net  Set Overnight)
                       1
                       1
                       I
                       3 Totals
                          Species
                         Number Caught
                   Carpsucker                         13
                   Channel Catfish
                   Gizzard Shad
                   Largemouth Buffalo
                   Sauger                             _1
                                                      14 Total
                                      July 1974
                            (1  Trammel Net Set Overnight)
                          Species
                         Number Caught
                   Carpsucker
                   Sauger
                               2

                               I Total
                                     October  1974
                 (2 Gill.Nets  and  1  Trammel Net, Each Set Overnight)

                   	Species	         Number Caught
                   Channel Cat
                   Gizzard Shad
                   Goldeye
                   Sauger
                   Shortnose Gar
                          1
                          0
                          6
                          1
                          0
                          8
                       0
                       2
                       2
                       0
                       4
                       8 Totals
                                          13/
                   Source: Baldwin and Hey—'

                           Hey and Baldwin-^/—/
                                        147
                          Hey  and Baldwin^'
   envirosphere
     company
«, DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                        IOWA PUBLIC  SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
  SUMMARY OF MISSOURI RIVER TRAMMEL AND GILL
             NET DATA,  1971-1975
                (SHEET 2 OF 3.)
DATE:
SCALE:

111-52
                                      TABLE
                                     III-C-7
                                     (Cont'd)

-------

(2 Gill Nets and 2
Species

Blue sucker
Carp
Carpsucker
Channel Catfish
Goldeye
River Redhorse
Shortnose Gar
S auger


(2 Gill Nets and 2
Species

Bigmouth Buffalo
Black Crappie
Carp
Carpsucker
Channel Catfish
Freshwater Drum
Gizzard Shad
Goldeye
Longnose Gar
May 1975
Trammel Nets, Each Set Overnight)
Number Caught
G T
3 0
0 2
1 3
1 0
10 10
1 1
2 1
1 _0
19 17 Totals
July 1975
Trammel Nets, Each Set Overnight)
Number Caught
G T
0 2
0 3
2 3
4 20
0 5
0 2
0 1
6 26
1 0


























Shorthead Redhorse 0 6
Shortnose Gar
5 0

Smallmouth Buffalo 0 4
White Crappie


(2 Gill Nets and 4
Species

Black Bullhead
Carp
Carpsucker
Channel Catfish
Gizzard Shad
Goldeye
Largemouth Bass
Perch
Sauger
_i __!
19 73 Totals
October 1975
Trammel Nets, Each Set Overnight)
Number Caught
G T
0 2
1 5
2 17
0 1
2 0
4 30
1 0
1 1
4 3















Shorthead Redhorse 3 3
Shortnose Gar
White Bass

9 2
_1 _0
28 64 Totals



G = Gill Net; T = Trammel Net Source: Baldwin and Hey — and Hey and Baldwin —
OIOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
SUMMARY OF
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION. OF r \SCO SERVICES INCORPORATED DATE:
MISSOURI RIVER TRAMMEL AND GILL
NET DATA, 1971-1975
(SHEET 3 OF 3)
SCALE:
TABLE
III-C-7
(Cont'd)

111-53

-------

Carp
Carpsucker
Redhorse
Scnallmouth buffalo

Gizzard shad
Freshwater drum
Goldevc
Bigmouth buffalo
Blue sucker
Fiathead catftsh
White sucker
Channel catfish
9-P--I
Above
1-1
H
1


1
1


1
1


Stonecat
Bc!o«
9
I i
2
1

1 t
4



1



Mi rmr carp :
Shortnose gar
Green sunfish ; 1 1
White has s ^
S auger ! j 1
lalleye


6-8-7}
Above
28
4
4
2

1
1



I
1




1

!

Below
X
2
3
3
6-J6-73
Above
14
15

1





1





1


1
1









i ]
"



Below
9
13
3
2

I

I

1





1


1
1
"-H-73
Above
14
9
2
1


2
2







Below
16
17
1
1

1



3





! 7
j






10-4-73
Above
8
4



15

1


1







2

Below
5
4
3


U
2










3
1

4-19-74
Above
4
2

1

1

1
1

1
1








Below
18
4

1


1
1
1











5-4-74
Above
6
5

- 1

1
-.1

1











Below
18
9
2
1

1
-.1
4




-1
-.1
1


1


5-20-74
Above
3
3
,<1





U











Below
5
3
2
3




1
<1





1




5-31-74
Above
8
4
<\
2





1


<\







Below
12
5
<1
4


<1
1

<1





1




Source:  Adapted from  Baldwin and Hey —



         and Hey and Baldwin  —'  —
envirosphere
company
A DIVISIC*-! Of :6ABCO SERVICES iNCORE'GPA-E!:
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
SYNOPSIS OF ELECTROFISHING RESULTS ABOVE AND BELOW GEORGE NEAL UNITS 1 & 2 (CATCH PER 1000 FT SHOCKED)
(SHEET 1 OF 2)
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
III -C B

-------
1



















Bigmouth Buffalo
Blue Sucker
Carp
Carpsucker
Channel Catfish
Flathead Catfish
Freshwater Drum
Gizzard Shad
Goldeye

Largemouth Bass
Mirror Carp

River Redhorse
S auger

Shorthead Redhorse
Shortnose Gar
Smallmouth Buffalo
tfalleye

tfhite Sucker
White Bass


k
Cr
envirosphere
company


July 25, 1974
Above
14
10








1

1




Below
1
19
11
1
<1
<1
1




< 1

5



November 1974
Above
6
11

<1
5





1

2



i
Below
7
13

<1
2





1

<1




May 1975
Above
4
12

<1

<1


<1
<1

<1
2




Below
1
1
6
10

1
<1
2


2
<1

<1
3

<1


July 1975
Above
4
17
2
<1

3




1

<1




Below
1
4
11
<1
<1

3



<1


1


<1

October
Above
1
3

2
3


2

<1
1





.
1975
Below

















IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
SYNOPSIS OF ELECTROFISHING RESULTS ABOVE AND BELOW
GEORGE NEAL UNITS 1 & 2 (CATCH PER 1000 FT SHOCKED)
(SHEET 2 OF 2)
DATE: SCALE:
1
3
5
<1
1
40

1


1
2


<1

1



















III-C-8
(Cont'd)

-------
       Date
May 1974

  Notropis

  Sauger

  Unidentified



June 1974

  Freshwater Drum

  Notropis

  Unidentified



July 1974

  Freshwater Drum

  Notropis

  Unidentified



August 1974

  Freshwater Drum

  Notropis
Condenser Passage
Drift Net
 Total
        42

         4

         0
   110

     0

     1
  152

    4

    1
       826

       108

         6
    62

    33
       132

       101

         1
     2

    51
  157



  888

  141

	6

1,035



  134

  152

	1

  287
                                                                     8
Collected with a Wildco Stream Drift Net - Nytex #6 - Aperature 243u
  Weekly interval collections
Condenser passage data represent a composite: of 4 thirty minute samples for each date
Drift Net Data for each date represent a composite of 3 five minute drift net
samples.                Source:  Hey and Baldwin - 17/
A
envirospnere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
LARVAL FISH SURVEY, SUMMER 1974
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
III-C-9
                                  111-56

-------

8,600 gallons
*
river water sampled





Condenser Passage
(Net placed in one in-
Date

5/15/75
5/22/75

5/30/75
6/ 3/75
6/ 6/75
6/10/75



6/13/75


6/17/75

6/19/75



6/23/75


6/26/75

6/30/75


11 3/75

11 6/75



envirosphere
company
take bay of Neal 2

none
1 egg

1 Notropis
none
none
1 Drum
2 Notropis


4 Notropis


8 Notropis

6 Drum
13 Notropis

,
1 egg
11 Drum
15 Notropis
72 Drum
10 Notropis
35 Drum
22 Notropis

34 Drum
10 Notropis
1 Blue Sucker
11 Drum
14 Notropis

IOWA PUBLIC



Intake
Velocity
(f/sec)
0.5
0.7

0.9
1.0
0.7
0.7
8,600 gallons
river water sampled
\
Drift Net
(Along shoreline,
just upstream from in
take house at Site 6)

Notropis
6 Notropis
1 Unidentified
9 Notropis
20 Notropis
25 Notropis
1 egg



- River
Velocity
(f/sec)
2.2
1.4

2.4
1.6
1.7
1.6
2 Bigmouth buffalo


0.5


0.6

0.4



0.8


1.0

0.8


0.5

0.6



SERVICE
1 Drum
13 Notropis
1 egg
4 Drum
104 Notropis
1 egg
7 Notropis
1 egg
6 Drum
1 Goldeye
23 Notropis
48 Drum
36 Notropis
1 Unidentified
96 Drum
19 Notropis
1 egg
47 Drum
25 Notropis
19 Drum
50 Notropis


1.4


2.3

1.4



1.8


1.5

1.8


1.6

1 Bigmouth buffalo 1.8
1 Catostomus
6 Drum
22 Notropis
Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
LARVAL FISH SURVEY, SUMMER 1975
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED' DAT E : SCALE:



TABLE
III-C-10

111-57

-------
8,600 gallons
river water sampled
Condenser Passage
(Net placed in one in- Intake
Date take bay of Neal 3 Velocity
(f/sec)
7/14/75 12 Drum
10 Notropis
7/17/75 1 Ictaluridae 0.4
33 Notropis
7/22/75 5 Notropis
7/25/75 2 Notropis

7/28/75 1 Drum
7/31/75 none 0.6
8/ 6/75 none 0.5
8/13/75 none 0.5
8/18/75 2 Notropis
8/25/75 none
*
Amount sampled using two nets
Source: Jane Hey. ^riar Cliff College,
Sioux City, Iowa.
Personal Communication
August 1976
OIOWA PUBLIC SERVICE
8,600 gallons
river water sampled
Drift Net
(Along shoreline,
just upstream from in- Intake
take house at Site 6 Velocity
(f/sec)
3 Drum
5 Notropis
1 Centrarchidae 1.6
2 Drum
31 Notropis
7 Notropis
1 Unidentified
1 Drum
7 Notropis
7 Notropis
2 Notropis 1.8
none 1.6
none 2 . 8
2 Notropis
none



Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
TABLE
envirosohere LARVAL FISH SURVEY, SUMMER 1975 in-c-io
company rr.ont'
-------
than  the  other  sections and the main channel of Section IV was
deeper".

         g.   Trophic Relationships

    Relationships among members of  the  various  trophic  levels
described  in  Section III-O2 are summarized in Appendix Exhibit
A-III-C-37.  Rooted aquatic macrophytes are noticeably absent  in
the channelized sections, and some of the larger fish species are
depicted   as   ingesting   large   quantities   of  allochtonous
materials - particularly  abattoir,  or  slaughterhouse   wastes.
Such  species  include  the  carp,  carpsucker  and  channel  and
flathead catfish.

    Many  invertefcrates  and  fish  are   opportunistic,   taking
organisms,  or  perhaps wastes, in relation to their availability
in the ecosystem.  Their food habits reflect relative  abundances
of  food  items  falling  within  ingestible  size  ranges in the
waterbody.31 Those of  others  indicate  selection  of  one  prey
species  in  preference  to another.  The potential for impact on
specific components on the generalized food web shown in Appendix
Exhibit A-III-C-37 is discussed in Section IV-B.

         h.   Rare and Endangered Species

    No species of fish indigenous to the Missouri River  at  Port
Keal  are  included on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service list of
threatened species.  However, the pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus
album) has been suggested for inclusion by Dr. Frank Cross of the
University of Kansas.  The State of Nebraska rates  the  skipjack
herring  (Alosa  chrysochloris)  as  rare,  and  the blue catfish
(Ictalurus furcatus)  as endangered.  A skipjack herring was taken
by bag seining in Spring 1972, and a pallid sturgeon was taken by
hook and line in 1972.
                                  111-59

-------
D.  METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY

    The site of George Neal Steam  Electric  Station  is  in  the
Missouri River Valley at an elevation of about 1075 feet mean sea
level  (MSL).  There are hills about 2 miles southwest of the site
with  a  northwest-southeast orientation.  Maximum elevations are
about 1500 feet MSL.

    The  climate  of  the  area   is   characterized   by   large
fluctuations  in  precipitation  and  temperature  from season to
season and from year to year; this is due  to  its  mid-latitutde
and  interior  continental location.  There is a prevailing moist
southerly flow from the  Gulf  of  Mexico  during  the  April  to
November  period, causing a summer rainfall maximum with frequent
thunderstorms and convective  type  precipitation.   Occasionally
hail,  high  winds  and  even  tornadoes  are associated with the
thunderstorms.  Winters are cold and relatively dry  due  to  the
prevailing northwesterly flow of dry Canadian air.

    Air  masses  from the Pacific Ocean moving across the western
United States frequently reach the area, producing  comparatively
mild and dry weather.  The autumnal "Indian Summers" are a result
of the dominance of these modified Pacific air masses.  Unusually
hot  temperatures and periodic droughts in the area are generally
associated with a flow  of  hot  dry  winds  originating  in  the
southwest desert portions of the country.

    The  climatology  of  the  site  area  is  mainly  based upon
meteorological data observed  at  the  National  Weather  Service
Forecast Office at the Sioux City Municipal Airport.  The airport
is  located about 7 miles north of Neal Unit H at an elevation of
1095 feet MSL.  Meteorological  conditions  at  the  airport  are
considered  representative  of  the  site  area  as  there are no
significant differences in  topography,  elevation  and  physical
features.   Actual  weather  conditions at the site, however, can
only be detei"mined by on-site measurements.

    Meteorological data from Des Moines, Iowa and Omaha, Nebraska
have been used whenever specific data from Sioux  City  were  not
available.   Des  Moines  is  about 155 miles southeast and Omaha
about  80 miles south of the site.  Although  climatic  conditions
are  generally  similar, the distances between these stations and
the site limit the representativeness of these data  to  specific
weather conditions in the site vicinity.

    1.   Temperature

    Table III-D-1 gives average and extreme dry bulb temperatures
and Table III-D-2 gives the specific  frequency   of  monthly  and
seasonal  wet  bulb  temperatures.   These temperatures are based
upon data for Sioux City for the base periods  specified  in  the
tables.   A  computer  program  was utilized to tabulate specific
frequencies of wet bulb temperatures from hourly  data.
                                  111-60

-------
Month
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Annual
Daily Avg.
Maximum
(°F)
27.9
31.7'
42.5
59.9
72.9
82.5
89.5
86.9
78.2
66.9
46.7
34.5
60.0
Daily Avg.
Mininum
<°F>
9.5
12.6
23.7
37.8
49.8
60.3
65.2
63.2
52.8
41.1
25.5
15.4
38.1
Monthly
Average
(° F)
18.7
22.2
33.1
48.9
61.4
71.4
77.4
75.1
65.5
54.0
36.1
25.0
49.1
Extreme
Highest
<°F>
59.0
66.0
91.0
94.0
102.0
104.0
102.0
101.0
101.0
93.0
77.0
64.0
104.0
Year
1964
1972
1968
1960
1967
1961
1964
1964
1971
1963
1971
1970
1961
Extreme
Lowest
<°F>
-26.0
-26.0
-22.0
19.0
28.0
40.0
42.0
43.0
30.0
13.0
- 6.0
-19.0
-26 0
Year
1970
1962
1960
1968
1967
1969
1971
1967
1967
1972
1964
1968
1970
              Extreme temperature data based on 13 Year base period.
Source:   Sioux City local Climatological Data, U S Department of Commerce, 1972.
e
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. -
AVERAGE AND EXTREME DRY BULB
SIOUX CITY, -IOWA (1931 -
DATE:
NEAL UNIT 4
TEMPERATURES
1960)
SCALE:
/
TABLE
III-D-1

-------


















Month/Season
December
January
February
Winter
March
April
May
Spring
June
July
August
Summer
September
October
November
Fall
Annual
Specific Frequency (Percent) ^ '
' 1 *
f)\
\f-.i
50.0° F
40.0
44.0
45.0
54.0° F
64.0
72.0
63.0
77.0° F
79.0
79.0
78.0
77.0°F
68.0
56.0
67.0
76.0° F
40.0° F
35.0
37.0
37.0
47.0° F
58.01
68.0
58.0
74.0° F
76.0
76.0
75.0
73.0° F
62.0
49.0
61.0
72.0° F
10
35.0° F
32.0
34.0
34.0
42.0° F
54.0
66.0
54.0
72.0° F
74.0
74.0
73.0
70.0° F
60.0
46.0
59.0
69.0° F
20
31.0° F
28.0
31.0
30.0
37.0° F
50.0
62.0
50.0
69.0° F
72.0
72.0
71.0
66.0° F
56.0
42.0
55.0
64.0° F
i
50
22.0° F
16.0
23.0
20.0
31.0° F
41.0
55.0
42.0
64.0° F
67.0
67.0
66.0
57.0° F
46.0
33.0
45.0
46.0° F
Above data based on 3.985 4,464 hourly observations per month.
75
11.0° F
4.0
13.0
9.0
25.0° F
35.0
49.0
36.0
59.0° F
63.0
62.0
61.0
50.0° F
40.0
27.0
39.0
29.0° F
90
1.0° F
-6.0
5.0
0.0
17,0° F
30.0
43.0-
30.0
54.0° F
59.0
58.0
57.0
45.0° F
34.0
18.0
32.0
15.0° I


















(1) Specific frequences defined as the percent of time that wet bulb temperature equals or exceeds
the corresponding wet-bulb temperature given in the table.
(2) Temperatures rounded to nearest whole degree.
Source: Hourly Meteorological Data Sioux Citv. Iowa. 1959 1964. U S Department of Commerce,
EDS, Asheville, North Carolina.
o
envirosphe
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES IN
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4

SPECIFIC FREQUENCY OF MONTHLY AND
re SEASONAL WET BULB TEMPERATURES(° F)
SIOUX CITY, IOWA (1959-1964) 1I1-D-2
:ORPORATEQ, DATE: " SCALE:

111-62

-------
    The average monthly dry bulb temperature ranges  from  18.7°F
in  January  to  77.4°F in July with an annual average of 49.1°F.
The extreme highest and lowest temperatures recorded during a 12-
year base period were 104°F in June 1961  and  -26°F  in  January
1970  and  February  1962.   As  is characteristic of continental
climates, there is a large diurnal range in temperature.

    The  wet  bulb  temperature  is,  along  with  the  dry  bulb
temperature, a measure of the humidity of the air.  It is usually
used   as   the  temperature  criterion  in  evaporative  cooling
processes.   The  specific  frequency  of  wet  bulb  temperature
indicates  the  percent of time that it equals or exceeds a given
value.  The data given in Table III-D-2,  for  example,  indicate
the wet bulb temperature in May is 68°F or higher five percent of
the time.  In September, however, the five percent level is 73°F.
Wet  bulb  temperatures  in the site vicinity are highest in July
and lowest in January with fall wet  bulb  temperatures  somewhat
higher than those found in spring.

    2.   Precipitation

    Average monthly precipitation amounts range from 0.74  inches
in December to 4.33 inches in June with slightly less than 3/4 of
the  annual  (24.77 inches) precipitation occurring during the 6-
month April-September period.  Precipitation amounts ranging from
trace to  9.69  inches  have  occurred  during  a  single  month.
Average  and monthly extreme precipitation data for the site area
are presented in Table III-D-3.

    Table III-D-4 presents maximum short period rainfall at Sioux
City for time periods ranging from 5 minutes to 24 hours.   These
maxima  all  occurred  during  summer  months  and are typical of
maximum rainfall values at other recording stations in the region
(Des Moines, Omaha, Drexel and  Sioux  Falls).1  The  Sioux  City
maximum  values  are far less than the maximum observed rainfalls
in other parts of the United States.

    3.   Drought

    Drought occurs periodically  in  Iowa;  the  most  severe  in
recent  decades  was  during  the 1930ls.  Other years of drought
were 1886, 1894, 1901, 1910, 1916, 1918, 1927 and the mid-1950's.

    4.   Snowfall

    Snowfall occurs primarily during the months from November  to
March,  although snow has been recorded as early as September and
as late as May.  The average annual snowfall  at  Sioux  City  is
31.6  inches.   However,  the annual snowfall has ranged from 7.9
inches during the 1968-1969 season to almost  66  inches  in  the
1959-1960 and 1961-1962 seasons.  Snowfalls of one or more inches
occur on an average of 10 days per year.  The maximum snowfall in
the area in a 24-hour period was 20 inches in April 1913.
                                  111-63

-------

















Month
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Annual
Average
Precipitation
0.78
0.89
1.46
2.25
3.23
4.33
3.11
2.66
2.74
1.42
1.16
0.74
24.77
Maximum/ 1 \
Monthly
2.44
2.48
3.19
4.35
8.46
8.67
6.12
7.75
9.69
3.73
4.10
1.68
9.69

Year
1949
1954
1962
1951
1959
1957
1962
1951
1965
1946
1948
1945
1965
Minimum
Monthly
0.11
0.17
0.29
0.45
0.60
1.87
0.41
0.61
0.07
T(2)
0.04
0.01
T

Year
1948
1949
1956
1942
1955
1958
1947
1955
1950
1958
1949
1943
1958















(1 ) Maximum and minimum data based on a 26-Year period of record.
(2) Trace is defined as an amount too small to measure.
Source: Sioux City Local Climatological Data, U S Department of Commerce, 1972.
envirosphei
company
* DIVISION Of- tBASCO SERVICES INCC
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
AVERAGE AND MONTHLY EXTREME PRECIPITATION
•e
(INCHES) SIOUX CITY, IOWA (1931-1960)
5RPORATED DATE: SCALE:
/
TABLE
III-D-3
111-64

-------













lime
Period
5 min
10 min
15 min
30 min
1 hr
2 hr
3hr
6 hr
12 hr
24 hr
Period of
Record
1907-1961
1907-1961
1907-1961
1907-1961
1907-1961
1907-1961
1907-1961
1907-1961
1907-1961
1891-1961
Rainfall
(Inches)
0.77
1.40
1.75
2.73
2.94
3.43
3.58
4.02
5.11
5.12

Date of
Occurrence
7/21/28
7/21/28
7/21/68
6/13/30
7/21/28
8/21/61
61 3/40
61 3/40
61 3/40
61 3/40
Source: Maximum Recorded United States Point Rainfall, U S Weather
Bureau, 1963.
e
envirosphere
company
* DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
MAXIMUM SHORT PERIOD RAINFALL
SIOUX CITY, IOWA
DATE: SCALE:















-
i TABLE
III-D-4 j

111-65

-------
    Table  III-D-5  presents  the  average  and  maximum  monthly
snowfall and the  average  number  of  days  each  month  with  a
snowfall of one inch or more at Sioux City.

    5.   Severe Weather

    Destructive storms in the region include thunderstorms,   hail
and  freezing  precipitation  (glaze).   Table  III-D-6 gives the
monthly and annual frequency of  these  phenomena  in  the  area.
About  94  percent  of the 47 thunderstorms per year occur during
the April to September period,  with  June  having  the  greatest
frequency.   Damaging hailstorms reach a maximum in early summer,
average three per year destroying about 1 or  2  percent  of  the
major crops.2 Freezing precipitation is the result of supercooled
rain or drizzle falling on surfaces with temperatures below 32F.3
The  precipitation  is supercooled by passing through subfreezing
air just before striking  the  ground.   Severe  storms  of  this
nature  can considerably reduce highway traffic, stretch or break
transmission lines and damage trees.  There are, on the  average,
nine glaze storms per year at Des Moines, with December being the
month  with  the  maximum  frequency of these storms.  During the
1953-1962 period, 15 tornadoes were reported in  the  Sioux  City
area.

    6.   Winds

    The prevailing wind  directions  at  Sioux  City  during  the
winter  months   (November through April) are northwest and north-
northwest with average wind speeds of about  14  miles  per  hour
(mph).   Prevailing  winds  are  from  the  southeast  and south-
southeast during the June-September period with average speeds of
about 12  mph.   Winds  are  transitional  in  May  and  October.
Northwest and north-northwest winds have a total annual frequency
of about 21 percent and southeast to south-southeast winds have a
total annual frequency of about 22 percent.  Calm conditions have
a  monthly  frequency that ranges from 1 percent to slightly less
than 3 percent.  An annual wind rose is shown in Exhibit III-D-1.

    The extreme mile wind speed is equal to the one mile  passage
of wind with the greatest speed during a given period at a height
of 30 feet above the ground.  Table III-D-7 gives monthly extreme
mile  wind speeds and Table III-D-8 gives the recurrence interval
of extreme mile wind speeds.  The maxiirum mile wind speed  during
a  32-year  period  was  91  mph  in  June  1945.   Winds of this
magnitude can be expected every 100 years, and winds with 70  mph
wind speeds can be expected to occur every 10 years.

    The  persistence  of  winds  from a given direction is, along
with speed and direction, another identifying  characteristic  of
the  wind  regime  at a given locale.  Table III-D-9 presents the
maximum persistence of wind direction at Sioux City during  a  6-
year  period.   A  computer program was utilized to determine the
maximum number of hours during the period that the wind was  from
each  of  16  wind sectors  (each sector is 22.5 degrees) and also
                                   III-66

-------
Month
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Annual
Average
Snowfall
(Inches)
6.1
6.1
8.2
1.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
T(2)
0.4
3.0
6.4
31.6
Average
Number of
Days ot I Inch
or More
2
2
3

* *
0
0
0
0

1
2
10
Maximum
Snowfall I1)
(Inches)
19.4
25.0
26.2
8.8
4.0
0.0
0.0
'.).0
0.4
5.1
15.1
20.6
26.2
Year
1936
1936
1962
1937
1945
-
-
-
1961
1970
-J959
1968
1962
(1)   Period of record 1933-1973.
(2)   Trace is defined as less than 0.05 inches.
**   Less than one-half day.
Source:  Sioux City Local Climatological Data, U S Department of Commerce, 1972.
envirosphere
company
'A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
AVERAGE AND EXTREME SNOWFALL DATA
SIOUX CITY, IOWA (1931 - 1960)
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
III-D-5

-------



















Month
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Annual
Frequency (Number of Days per Month per Year)

Thunderstorms^ >
*
*
1
4
8
10
9
8
5
2
*
*•
47

HaU(l)
0
0
**
1
1
1
* *
* *
* *
* *
0
0
3
Freezing^)
Precipitation
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
9
















(1) Thirty-two year period of record for Sioux City, Iowa
(2) Ten-year period of record for DCS Moines. Iowa
* Less than one-half day per month
** Less than one day per month
Sources: Sioux City Local Climatological Data. U S Department of Commerce. 1972.
Climatic Summary of the U S - Sioux City. U S Weather Bureau. 1930.
Glaze - It's Meteorology and Climatology, Geographic Distribution and
Economic Effects. Quartermaster Research and Engineering Command.
Tech Report EP-105. 1959.
o
envirosphere
company
• »
•A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED

SEVERE WEATHER PRECIPITATION TABLE
SIOUX CITY - DES MOINES, IOWA III-D-6


DATE: SCALE:
111-68

-------
\0-3  4-7 8-12 13-M W-24 >2S
               •    •
                MPH
or wm DIWCTIO* AKD snto
DIRECT m
HOTW.Y OBSi«v»n«w or WIHD SPEED
(in MILES ret HOMO AV
AT srnv
0-3 ft - 7 8-12 13-18 1» - 2ft 25-31 32-38 39-46 OVE« TOTAL


St
E
SE
r '.
WWW
KKW
CALM 1.
TOTAL 9,
'•
j
;.
2.
L-

i!
;•
L
3.
4.
3.
'•
l!
.

t.
2.
'•
1.
l'




'•


.4
*
+ +
.1 * * 1
.3 .1 * - 1
.2 .! T <-
!:!,!.
1.3 1.4 2.6 1.8 .9 .3 .1 1

19.9 31.0 24.8 10.1 3.6 .9 .2 +
»!
^ 8.

1 .
1 •
1 '
..'
| '

on i .;
e
envirosphere
company
* DIVISION Of :BASrO Sf»VICi= iNCOHPOBATiiJ
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY -
SURFACE WIND ROSE - SIOUX CITY
ANNUAL (1951 - I960)
DATE:
NEAL UNIT 4
, IOWA
SCALE:
EXHIBIT
III-D-1

-------

















Month
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Annual
Speed
(mph)
56
54
61
68
80
91
66
56
66
70
59
53
91

Direction
NW
NW
N
W
W
W
NW
NW
S
W
NW
NW
W
Year of
Occurrence
1967
1947
1950
1946
1956
1945
1967
1951
1957
1940
1954
1968
1945















Extreme mile windspeed is the one mile passage of wind with the
greatest speed at a height of 30 feet above the ground. Data base
is a 32-year period of record.
Source: Sioux City Local Climatological Data, U S Department of Commerce, 1972.

o
envirosphere
company
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
MAXIMUM MONTHLY EXTREME MILE WINDSPEED TABLE
SIOUX CITY, IOWA iii-D-7

A DIVISION of EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED DATE: SCALE:
111-70

-------
                           Extreme
                        Mile Windspeed
                            (mph)
                              70
                              75
                              81
                              90
                            Recurrence
                             Interval
                               (Yrs)
                                 10
                                 25
                                 50
                                100
     Extreme mile windipced is the one mile pamfc of wind with the greatest speed at a height of
     30 feet above the ground.  Data base is a 21-year period of record.
     Source:     Thorn, H.C.S.
                          12/
        o
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
 IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT  4
  RECURRENCE  INTERVALS OF EXTREME MILE
        WINDSPEEOS  SIOUX CITY, IOWA
DATE:
SCALE:
111-71
                                       TABLE
                                       III-D-8

-------

One-Sector Wi'id Direction (*)
Wind
Direction
N
NNE
NE
ENE
E
ESE
SE
SSE
S
SSW
SW
WSW
w
WNW
NW
NNW
Date
1-13-60
12-20-62
6-20-59
4- 3-64
5- 2-64
3-15-60
1-30-60
11-28-62
5-25-59
4-25-62
5-12-59
10-31-59
4-14-64
9- 2-59
1-16-59
10-24-59
Avg.
Speed
(mph)
10.4
9.7
9.3
,20.1
8.5
12.5
12.3
13.1
20.1
20.1
10.3
15.0
20.3
11.1
15.7
25.7
Hours
13
21
9
21
16
28
23
35
16
16
9
7
21
14
29
32
Three-Sector WinH Direction (2)
Wind
Direction
NNW-N-NNE
N-NNE-NE
NNE-NE-ENE
NE-ENE-E
ENE-E-ESE
E-ESE-SE
ESE-SE-SSE
SE-SSE-S
SSE-S-SSW
S-SSW-SW
SSW-SW-WSW
SW-WSW-W
WSW-W-WNW
W-WNW-NW
WNW-NW-NNW
NW-NNW-N
Date
1-11-63
12- 1-60
3-26-59
2- 3-64
3-15-60
5- 6-61
3- 3-62
6-25-63'
5-17-62
2- 3-59
4-24-62
4-14-64
5-24-62
9-24-64
12-30-59
2-12-63
Avg.
Speed
(mph)
16.2
20.2
19.6
11.0
12.5
18.0
13.0
15.5
17.3
17.3
13.4
20.3
14.7
12.7
18.8
16.0
Hours
49
67
56
42
43
57
67
71
64
20
18
21
28
50
97
62
The maximum persistence of wind direction is the greatest number of consecutive
hours during the 1959-1964 period that the wind direction was from the given
direction or directions. Data is based on 52,589 hourly observations during the 1954-1964 period.
(1) Wind was from the one given wind direction for the given number of consecutive hours.
(2) Wind was from any one of the three adjacent wind directions for the given number of consecutive hours.
Source: Hourly Meteorological Data - Sioux City, Iowa, 1959-1964, U S Department of Commerce,
EDS, Asheville, North Carolina. v
envirosphere
company
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4

MAXIMUM PERSISTENCE OF WIND DIRECTION TABLE
SIOUX CITY, IOWA (1959 - 1964) m-D-9
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPOBATED DAT E ' SCALE:
111-72

-------
from each of 16 groups  of  three  adjacent  wind  sectors.    The
maximum  persistence  of  wind  direction  from one sector was 35
hours of winds from the south-southeast on November 28-29,  1962.
The  maximum  persistence of wind direction from any one of three
adjacent directions was 97 hours of winds from either  the  west-
northwest, northwest and north-northwest during a period starting
December 30, 1959.  The data indicate that in general, winds from
the  northwest,  southeast and adjacent directions tend to be the
most persistent; these also are the prevailing wind directions in
the Sioux City area.

    7.   Visibility and Fog

    Table III-D-10 gives  the  percent  frequency  of  restricted
visibility  at  Des Moines and fog at Sioux City.  The restricted
visibilities given in this table are mainly due to  haze,  smoke,
fog  and  precipitation.   The  percent frequency of dense fog is
associated with visibilities reduced to 0.25 miles or less.

    The incidence  of  both  restricted  visibility  and  fog  is
greatest  during  the fall and winter months and least during the
spring and summer months.  This is probably  due  to  the  higher
frequency  of inversions during the winter and fall seasons which
inhibit the dispersion of water vapor and pollutants  (see Section
IIJ-D-8) .

    8.   Diffusion Climatology

    The  dispersion  characteristics  of  the  atmosphere  depend
mainly  on  horizontal  wind speed, thermal stability and surface
roughness.  The distribution  of  these  parameters  defines  the
diffusion climatology at a particular site.

    Pasquill5  correlated  thermal stability with solar radiation
and surface wind speed.  The resulting Pasquill classification of
thermal stability ranges from extremely  unstable   (Class  A)  to
extremely  stable   (Class  F).  Turner6 proposed a scheme for the
classification of thermal stability which utilized hourly surface
meteorological data.  The Turner stability classes are  described
and compared to those of Pasquill in Table III-D-11.

    Table  III-D-12  gives  the  seasonal  percent  frequency  of
stability  classes  at  Sioux  City,   These   frequencies   were
determined  by  a  computer  program  for  the  period 1959-1969.
Hourly  meteorological  observations   from   Sioux   City   were
stratified  into  stability classes in accordance with the method
developed by Turner.   This  procedure  correlates  the  vertical
temperature  lapse  rate  with solar elevation angle, total cloud
cover, cloud ceiling height and wind speed.

    Neutral (Class 4)  conditions prevail most of the  time   (58.1
percent)  while  stable   (Class  5-7)  and  unstable  (Class 1-3)
conditions  are  less  frequent  (27  percent  and  15   percent,
respectively) .   Neutral  conditions are most prevalent in spring
                                  111-73

-------
Season
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
Annual
Restricted Visibility (Miles)^1)
0.0-0.5
7.9
2.4
0.5
1.5
3.1
0.5-1.0
6.6
3.0
0.6
2.5
3.2
1.0-2.0
8.9
4.9
1.1
3.8
4.7
2.0-6.0
27.1
20.1
12.2
28.1
21.9
Total
50.5
30.4
14.4
35.9
32.8
Dense (2)
Fog
10.0
4.3
3.3
5.5
5.2
(1)   Des Moines, Iowa. Data base is 12,591 observations.

(2)   Sioux City, Iowa. Thirty-two year period of record.  Dense fog has visibility reduced to
     0.25 mile or less.

Sources: Airway Meteorological Atlas for the United States, U S Weather Bureau, 1941.
         Sioux City Local Climatological Data, U S Department of Commerce, 1972.
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION CF E8ASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
PERCENT FREQUENCY OF RESTRICTED
VISIBILITIES AND FOG
DES MOINES - SIOUX CITY, IOWA
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
III-D-10
                                      111-74

-------
               PAM,'( ILL -TAHll.m CLASSIFICATIONS
A.   EXTREMELY UNSTABLE CONDITIONS

B    MODERATELY (NSTAPLE  CONDITIONS

C    SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE CONDITIONS

D.   NEITRAL CONDITIONS  -  APPLICABLE TO HEAVY OVERCAST
     DAY OR NIGHT

E.   SLIGHTLY STABLE CONDITIONS

f.   MODERATELY  STABLE  ( ONDITIONS
RELATION OK TTRNER STABILITY' < LASS TO PASQLTLL
                  STABILITY  < LASS
        Subilitv  Clas
                                     Pasqmll
                                    ability CU
RELATION OF PASOUILL STABILITY TO LEATHER CONDITIONS
Surface Wind
Speed, m/sec.
Less than 2
2
4
6
More than 6
Strong
A
A-B
B
C
C
Solar Radiation
Moderate
A-B
B
B-C
C-D
D
Slight
B
C
C
D
D
Nighttime Conditions
Thin Overcast
or 4/8
Cloudinm*'
by
E
D
D
D
3/8
Cloudiness
b/
F
E
D
D
                                                                                                      a,   The degree of cloudness  is defined as  that fraction of the sky above the local apparent horizon which is
                                                                                                          covered by clouds.


                                                                                                      b   Mo classifications have been made because the plume is unlikely to have any definable travel.
envirosphere
company
A LWISION OF tBASCO «SVIC^ INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
RELATION OF PASQUILL STABILITY TO WEATHER CONDITIONS AND
RELATION OF TURNER STABILITY CLASS TO PASQUILL STABILITY
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
Ill-D- 11

-------
Stability
Class
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Seasonal Frequency (Percent)
Winter
0.00
1.13
6.70
64.27
13.39
10.26
4.24
Spring
0.21
3.64
8.14
68.67
9.87
6.84
2.64
Summer
1.09
8.77
16.40
47.55
12.17
10.24
3.78
Fall
0.04
3.43
10.41
52.08
15.70
13.00
5.34
Annual
0.34
4.26
10.44
58.06
12.79
10.10
4.01
 Data based on 52,589 hourly mean observations.

Source:  Hourly Meteorological Data - Sioux City, Iowa, 1959-1964, U S Department of
         Commerce, EDS. Asheville, North Carolina.
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
SEASONAL DISTRIBUTION OF STABILITY CLASSES
SIOUX CITY, IOWA (1959 - 1964)
DATE; SCALE:
TABLE
III-D-12

-------
as a result of the higher wind  speeds  during  this  season  and
unstable  conditions  occur  most  often during the summer due to
increased solar radiation.  Stable conditions are  most  frequent
in the fall.

    Table   III-D-13   gives  the  annual  percent  frequency  of
stability classes according to wind  direction.   The  coincident
wind  speed  is  also  given for each wind direction.  These data
give an areal representation of the diffusion characteristics  of
the  atmosphere in the site vicinity.  In general, the dispersion
capacity of the atmosphere increases with increasing  instability
and higher wind speeds.

    Wind  direction  is  not highly correlated with stability but
the dispersion capacity of the  atmosphere  is  somewhat  greater
with  winds  from  the  south and west than from other directions
(winds from the south-southwest are associated  with  instability
22 percent of the time).  Winds from the northwest through north-
northeast  have  the  highest incidence of neutral conditions  (68
percent).

    The  site  is  in  an  area  which  rarely  experiences   the
occurrence  of  stagnating  high-pressure systems.7 Consequently,
there is little potential  for  persisting  high  levels  of  air
pollution.

    The  mixing  height  is  defined  as  the  thickness  of  the
atmosphere  layer  above  the  earth's  surface   through   which
pollutants  are  presumed  to  mix by convection.8 The higher the
mixing height,  the  greater  the  dispersion  potential  of  the
atmosphere.   A  study by Holzworth9 indicates that the potential
for episodes with  limited  dispersion  conditions  in  the  site
vicinity  is  less  than  5 days per year.  An episode of limited
dispersion was defined as follows:

    • All mixing heights 4920 feet or less.
    • Average wind speeds 13 mph or less.
    • No significant occurrence of precipitation.
    • Above conditions satisfied continuously for at least 2 days.

    Mean maximum mixing heights at Omaha, Nebraska*°  range  from
1214  feet  in  January  to  4395  feet  in July.  January mixing
heights at other reporting stations  in  the  continental  United
States range from about 561 feet in Jackson, Wyoming to 4092 feet
in  Miami,  Florida.   July mixing heights range from 924 feet in
Seattle, Washington to 13,134 feet in Ely,  Nevada.   The  values
for  Omaha,  therefore,  are somewhat less than average values in
the country but fairly representative of mixing heights for otner
reporting stations in the upper midwest.

    The mixing height  is  coincident  with  the  height  of  the
inversion  base.   This  height is a boundary delineating the two
distinct layers: a well mixed layer below and a stable  inversion
layer  above.   Table  III-D-14  gives  the  percent frequency of
                                  111-77

-------
















Wind
Direction
N
NNE
NE
ENE
E
ESE
SE
SSE
S
ssw
sw
wsw
w
WNW
NW
NNW
Calm
Total
Avg. Wind
Speed (mph)
11.1
9.8
10.0
10.1
8.7
8.9
10.1
11.5
12.7
12.2
9.1
8.1
8.5
0.6
13.8
13.5
0.0

Wind Speed (mph) -
Stability Class
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.06
0.34
3.8
2
0.25
0.21
0.21
0.15
0.21
0.19
0.38
0.54
0.31
0.29
0.22
0.13
0.19
0.22
0.33
0.28
0.16
4.26
5.7
3
0.42
0.36
0.30
0.24
0.38
0.67
1.24
1.47
1.00
0.84
0.40
0.25
0.41
0.50
0.90
0.84
0.21
10.44
9.3
4
3.18
2.51
1.89
1.93
2.38
J-. 9 7
6.25
7.25
4.38
2.64
1.18
0.73
1.21
2.51
8.25
7.54
0.28
58.06
13.6
5
0.43
0.39
0.24
0.25
0.60
2.43
2.68
1.26
0.52
0.24
0.21
0.23
0.46
0.57
1.32
0.97
0.00
12.79
8.7
6
0.39
0.37
0.25
0.19
0.51
1.77
1.45
0.73
0.46
0.28
0.35
0.32
0.61
0.64
0.95
0.71
0.12
LQ.10
5.6
Data based on 52.589 hourly mean observations for period January 1, 1959-Dccember 31, 1964
Source: Hourly Metrorological Data - Sioux Citv, Iowa, 1959-1964, U S Department ot Commerce, EDS,
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
7
0.19
0.18
0.07
0.08
0.15
0.17
0.24
0.19
0.17
0.15
0.21
0.18
0.27
0.27
0.32
0.29
0.87
4.01
2.4
Total
4.88
4.05
2.98
2.85
4.24
9.23
12.24
11.47
6.86
4.46
2.60
1.85
3.16
4.71
12.07
10.64
1.71
100.00

Asheville, North Carolina
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
PERCENT FREQUENCY OF STABILITY CLASS BY WIND DIRECTION AND
COINCIDENT WIND SPEED
DATE: SCALE:
















TABLE
II1-D-33

-------

Season
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
Annual
Local Standard Time
0500
72
60
80
64
69
0800
57
23
15
42
34
1700
43
8
9
22
20
2000
61
58
70
71
65
Average
42
27
33
38
35
         Base on inversion less than 500 feet above the station elevation.
         Source:  Hosier, C.R.,
                           I!/
        e
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE  Co. - MEAL UNIT 4
  PERCENT FREQUENCY OF  INVERSIONS

     OMAHA,  NEBRASKA (1955 - 1957)
                       DATE:
            SCALE:



            111-79
TABLE



III-D-14

-------
inversions with bases less than 500 feet at Omaha,  Nebraska.   The
seasonal  and  diurnal  variation  of  inversion   frequency   is
characteristic  of  a  continental climate.11  Nocturnal stability
and daytime instability are prevalent in the lower levels of  the
atmosphere  and  there is a higher frequency of inversions during
the winter and fall seasons than during  the  spring  or  summer.
The  higher  frequency  of  stability during the colder months is
mainly due to a maximum length of a stable nocturnal period  with
strong  radiational  cooling  from  the earth1s surface.  Average
inversion frequencies for Omaha range from 42  percent during  the
winter  to 27 percent during the spring.  The annual frequency is
35 percent.  The incidence of inversions is greatest  during  the
early  morning  hours  [an annual frequency of 69 percent at 0500
local standard time  (LST)] and least during the afternoon with an
annual frequency of 20 percent at 1700 LST.
                                   111-80

-------
E.  BACKGROUND AMBIENT AIR QUALITY

    Measurements of background air quality in the vicinity of the
Neal Station have been taken by the Iowa Public  Service  Company
intermittently between May of 1972 and March of 1976 as discussed
in  detail in Appendix A-III-E.  For the purposes of this report,
ambient data were also obtained from the 1975 reports of the Iowa
Air Pollution Control Commission (IAPCC) and  the  Air  Pollution
Control  Division  of  the  Nebraska  Department of Environmental
Control (NDEC).

    1.   Particulate Concentrations

    Particulate   concentrations    were    measured    by    IPS
simultaneously  with  four  high  volume samplers surrounding the
Neal Station.* By comparing the four simultaneous concentrations,
(Table III-E-1) it was possible to determine  if  any  level  was
either  incorrect because of a sampling or analysis error, or not
representative of the area-wide background because of a localized
effect.  Such incorrect and non-representative  values  were  not
considered  in  the  background  analysis.  The remaining values,
when represented using a log-normal frequency distribution, had a
median of 30 ug/m3 and a geometric  standard  deviation  of  1.9.
These   results   correspond   to   the  levels  of  natural  and
agricultural dust typical of rural areas,  (see USEPA  Publication
AP-49,  Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter 1969, p. 15).
Although  the  75  ug/m3  annual  particulate  standard  is   not
violated,  statistical  extrapolation  of the data indicates that
the 150 ug/m3 24-hour secondary  standard  is  probably  exceeded
about twice yearly, while only one such excess is permitted.  The
24-hour  primary  standard  of  260  ug/m3  is not expected to be
exceeded.  It should be noted that this  situation  is  area-wide
and  is  not attributable to the Neal Station, since point-source
effects were excluded from the ambient data.  The effects of  the
Neal Station will be described subsequently in Chapter IV.

    Particulate  matter  monitored  by  the  IAPCC  in Sioux City
exhibited a median of 50 ug/m3 and a geometric standard deviation
of 1.8.  Although the 75 ug/m3 annual standard is  met,  the  150
ug/m3  24-hour  secondary standard is projected to be exceeded 11
times  yearly.    The  260  ug/m3  24-hour  primary  standard   is
projected not to be violated.

    The  RDEC  particulate  data  for  South  Sioux  City,  Table
III-E-2, have a  median  value  of  130  ug/m3  and  a  geometric
standard  deviation  of  1.7.   The  75  ug/m3 annual standard is
contravened at this location.  The 150  ug/m3  24-hour  secondary
standard  is  estimated  to be exceeded 144 times yearly, and the
260 ug/m3 24-hour primary standard 35 times yearly.

    The occurrences of high particulate concentrations  discussed
above are evaluated in detail in Section IV-C-4-c.
*The locations of these stations are presented in Appendix
Exhibit A-III-E-1 and Table A-III-E-1.

                                  111-81

-------
All Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Data reflects 24-hour sampling periods.
Sampling ran from midnight to midnight. All final concentrations are expressed
in Micrograms/M .
Micrograms per Cubic Meter
Day Sampled
(midnight-
midnight)
11/17/75
11/24/75
12/01/75
12/08/75
12/14/75
12/21/75
12/28/75
1/04/76
1/11/76
1/18/76
1/25/76
2/ 1/76
21 8/76
2/15/76
2/22/76
2/29/76
North Site Terra Site



*
•31 24 	
21.72 25.11
	 33.11
	 59.70
	 65.21
*
	 140 08
53.69 28.30
16.13 12.96
12.75 11.94
67.73 103.31*
6.72 17.71
60.67 89.19
3/07/76 19.02 19.47
3/14/76 16.75 21.72
*
Not considered.
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF E6ASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
AIR QUALITY MONITORING
HIGH VOLUME SAMPLER
Nebraska Site


23.31
7.80
27.24
27.10
39.00
28.11
41.52
91.60
25.10
14.54
13.68
55.62
17.98
61.41
25.49
20.24
- NEAL UNIT 4
SYSTEM
DATA
DATE: SCALE:
South Site


50.20
47.90
40.40
28.21
42.26
65.60

43.20
71.08*
27.30
45.04
22.39
62.85
22.68

TABLE
III-E-1
111-82

-------
DATE


1/06/75
1/18/75
1/30/75
2/11/75
2/23/75
3/07/75
3/19/75
3/31/75
4/12/75
4/24/75
5/06/75
5/18/75
5/30/75
6/11/75
6/23/75
7/05/75
7/17/75
7/29/75
8/10/75
8/22/75
9/03/75
9/15/75
9/27/75
10/09/75
10/21/75
11/02/75
11/14/75
11/26/75
12/08/75
12/20/75
CONCENTRATIONS WIND DIRECTION
(micrograms per (degrees)
cubic meter)
Invalid 190
24.8 290
53.3 30
71.3 320
98.5 340
46.9 330
210.0 220
182.2 340
137.0 240
219.5 100
295.8 120
196.1 70
129.8 350
73.2 290
145.8 150
138.9 290
271.0 180
169.8 140
119.1 110
119.7 100
160.6 340
92.0 170
105.4 180
205.5 ' 280
221.6 340
148.4 150
87.4 50
Invalid
62.9 310
99.1 340
North is equal to 0 and 360 .
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF E8ASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATES
TABLE
CITY - SOUTH SIOUX CITY, COUNTY - DAKOTA
LOCATION - CITY OFFICES III-E-2
DATE: SCALE:
111-83

-------
    2.   Sulfur Dioxide Concentrations

    Sulfur dioxide (SO2) monitoring conducted by the IAPCC at  an
urban  location  (Sioux  City)  and by the NDEC at more industrial
(South Sioux  City,  Table  III-E-3)  and  rural  (Grand  Island,
Nebraska)   sites,  indicate  that  background  S02  levels in the
region are negligibly low.  Similarly, background sulfate  levels
which may result from the oxidation and hydration of SO2 as it is
transported  over  great  distances  appear also to be low in the
area.  Based on EPA data, background sulfate levels are  expected
to average 2 ug/m3.

    3.   Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations

    Nitrogen dioxide  (N02) concentrations measured  (using  a  wet
chemical  method)  by  IPS at the Neal Station exhibited a median
value of 7ug/m3 and a geometric standard deviation of  1.9.   The
NDEC  NO2  data  for  Lincoln have a median value of 30 ug/m3 and
geometric standard deviation of 2.0.  The 100  ug/m3  annual  NO2
standard is satisfied at both locations.

    4.   Emission Inventory Data

    Current emission inventory data obtained from the IAPCC   (for
Woodbury  County) and the NDEC  (for Dakota and Thurston Counties)
offer  some  support  for  the  ambient  air  quality   situation
discussed above.  The major single existing source of particulate
matter,  is  the  Neal  Station Units 1-3 emitting  1,554 tons per
year  (tpy).  There are also five other major  industrial  sources
within  the  near  vicinity  which emit over 2400 tpy for a total
emission of over 4000 typ.

    There are no point sources in  the  area  which  emit  sulfur
oxides  in  quantities  comparable to the Neal Station emissions.
Other than Neal Station   Units  1-3,  the  only  major  source  of
nitrogen  oxide emission  in the area is one nearby  industry which
emits approximately 1100  tpy.  The major  source  of  hydrocarbon
emission  in  the  area   is Concrete Pipe Machinery in Sioux City
 (672 tpy).

    Table III-E-4 presents a summary of  background air  quality
data.
                                   111-84

-------
                      DATE
                     1/06/75
                     1/18/75
                     1/30/75
                     2/11/75
                     2/23/75
                     3/07/75
                     3/19/75
                     3/31/75
                     4/12/75
                     4/24/75
                     5/06/75
                     5/18/75
                     5/30/75
                     6/11/75
                     6/23/75
                     7/05/75
                     7/17/75
                     7/29/75
                     8/10/75
                     8/22/75
                     9/03/75
                     9/15/75
                     9/27/75
                    10/09/75
                    10/21/75
                    11/02/75
                    11/14/75
                    11/26/75
                    12/08/75
                    12/20/75
                                 CONCENTRATIONS
                              (parts per million)
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .004
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
                                      .000
        e
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF E8ASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
  IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
     S02 BUBBLER CITY - SOUTH SIOUX CITY
   COUNTY - DAKOTA,LOCATION - CITY OFFICES
DATE:
SCALE:

111-85
                                      TABLE

                                     III-E-3

-------
Contaminant
Particulates
Location
Sulfur Dioxide
Sulfuric Acid

Nitrogen Dioxide
Hours of Data
Neal Sta.(4 sites)   1,272

Sioux City, la.      1,296

S.Sioux City, Ne.       672


Sioux City, la.      1,320

S. Sioux City, Ne.     720

Grand Island, Ne.       720

Regional Estimate

Neal Station           360

Lincoln, Ne.         1,344
Median Concentration
                             30 ug/m"
                                    3
                             50 ug/nT

                            130 ug/m3
                              0 ug/m
                                    3
                              0 ug/m

                              0 ug/m3

                              2 ug/m
                              7 ug/
             m
                                                                  30 ug/m
Geom. Std. Dev.

      1.9

      1.8

      1.7
      1.9

      2.0
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
BACKGROUND AIR QUALITY
DATE:
- NEAL UNIT 4
DATA SUMMARY
SCALE:
TABLE
III-E-4

-------
F.  TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY

    1.   Vegetation*

         a.   Brief History of Natural Vegetation of Woodbury and
              Dakota Counties

    The natural and undisturbed vegetation of  Woodbury,  Monona,
Dakota   and   Thurston  Counties  originally  consisted  of  two
community types, bluestem or tall grass prairie,  and  floodplain
forests.   The  former  extended  from North Dakota and Minnesota
south to Oklahoma.  It was characterized by  the  four  principle
grasses:  big  bluestem, little bluestem, switchgrass, and Indian
grass.1 Bluestem  comprised  eighty  to  ninety  percent  of  the
Missouri  River  lowland  vegetation  cover, with switchgrass and
prairie cordgrass dominant in wetter sites and needlegrass in the
dry sandy hillsides2 (locally scarce  in  the  vicinity  of  Neal
Unit 4).   Because of the rich mollisol soils developed under the
tall grass, this community type has  been  entirely  replaced  by
agricultural  crops  (corn, soybeans); patches of native bluestem
prairie may still be found along roadways and railroad tracks.

    Floodplain  forests  formerly  extended  from  the   Missouri
River's  edge to almost a half mile on either side; thin lines of
trees and shrubs continued along tributary river and stream banks
breaking up the expanses of Nebraska and Iowa tall grass prairie.
Soil  moisture  availability,  more  than   any   other   factor,
determined   the   distribution  of  wood  plants.   Insufficient
rainfall limited forested regions to generally riparian and mesic
hillside sites.3 Pure stands of cottonwood and willow,  described
in  more  detail below, covered the more frequently flooded first
floodplain, while the  poorly  drained  soils  of  the  remaining
portions  of  the  valley  which  were only occasionally flooded,
consisted of marshland, cordgrass and bluestem prairies.2 Forests
dominated by basswood  (linden) and red oak, presently  not  found
on  the  Iowa  side of the river near the proposed sites, covered
the more mesic protected slopes and bluffs.*

    As with the native prairie, farm crops have replaced much  of
the original forest vegetation, which now comprises only four and
five  percent of Woodbury and Dakota Counties, respectively.5,6 A
relatively  large  portion  of  the  basswood-red  oak  and   bur
oak-Kentucky   coffeetree-black   walnut  types  remains  on  the
Nebraska uplands  of  Dakota  and  Thurston  Counties  while  the
cottonwood -  willow  floodplain  forest  is limited to scattered
patches along the Missouri's banks.

         b.   Existing  Local Natural Vegetation

    Exhibit III-F-1 depicts the distribution of plant communities
found in the floodplain  area  of  Neal  Unit 4.   The  following
descriptions  are  derived  from the study of aerial photographs,
visual field inspections,7 and literature accounts.2,*
*The latin names of plant species cited in the text are
presented on Table III-F-1.
                                  111-87

-------
                       Colloquial Name
                                         Latin Name*
                Cattail

                Big  bluestem
                Little bluestem
                Switchgrass
                Indian grass
                Prairie cordgrass
                Needlegrass
                Kentucky bluegrass
                Brome grasses
                Bunchgrass
                Corn
                Wild rye

                Sedges
                Bullrushes
                hastern cottonwood
                Sandbar willow
                Peach-leaved willow
                Black  willow
                Bitternut  hickory
                Red oak
                Bur oak

                Red elm
                American elm
                Hackberry

                Mulberry

                Knotweed
                                  Typha latifolia
                                  Andropogon gerardi
                                  Andropogon scoparius
                                  Panicum  virgatum
                                  Sorghastrum nutans
                                  Spartina  pectinata
                                  Stipa spartea
                                  Poa  pratensis
                                  Bromus spp.
                                  Sporobolus airoides
                                  Zea  mays
                                  Elymus sp.
                                  Carex spp.
                                  Scirpus validus
                                  Scirpus fluviatilis
                                  Scirpus acutus

                                  Populus deltoides
                                  Salix interior
                                  Salix amygdaloides
                                  Salix nigra
                                  Carya corditormis
                                  Quercus  rubra
                                  Quercus  macrocarpa
                                  Ulmus rubra
                                  Ulmus americana
                                  Celtis occidentals

                                  Morus rubra

                                  Polygonum spp.
        O
   envirosphere
      company
«i DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL  UNIT 4
        LATIN NAMES OF PLANT SPECIES
          CITED IN TEXT (SHEET 1 OF 2)
DATE:
SCALE:
111-88
                                         TABLE
                                         III-F-1

-------
             Table  111-Pi (Cont'd)
             Latin Names of Plants Cited in Text
                   Colloquial Name
                                 Latin Namea
             Prairie rose
             Kentucky Coffee-tree
             Indigobusb
             Soybean

             Smooth sumac
             Poison ivy

             Silver maple
             Boxelder

             Riverbank grape
             Virginia creeper

             Basswood

             Russian olive

             Roughleaf dogwood

             Green  ash

             American germander

             Wolfberry
             Coral berry
             Elder

             Goldenrods
             Oxeye
             Sunflowers
                          Rosa blanda
                          Trymnocladus dioica
                          Amorpha fruticosa
                          Clycine max
                          Rhus glabra
                          Rhus radicans
                          Acer saccharinum
                          Acer negundo

                          Vitis riparia
                          Parthenocissus quinquefolia
                          Tilia americana

                          hlaeagnus angustifolia

                          Cornus drummondi

                          Fraxinus pennsylvanica

                          Teucrium canadense

                          Symphoricarpus occidentalis
                          Symphoricarpus orbiculatus
                          Sambucus canadensis

                          Solidago spp.
                          Heliopsis helianthoides
                          Helianthus spp.
                   According to Fernald
                                        isy
  envlrosphere
     company
DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                          IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co.  - NEAL UNIT 4
LATIN NAMES OF PLANT SPECIES
 CITED IN TEXT (SHEET 2 OF 2)
                         DATE:
          SCALE:
          111-89
TABLE
III-F-1
(Cont'd)

-------
              i. Cottonwood

    Homogenous, even aged stands of mature prairie cottonwood and
an understory of hackberry, roughleaf dogwood, poison ivy,  green
ash,  and  red  elm  are  characteristic.  Black and peach-leaved
willows are often  sparsely  distributed.   The  vines  riverbank
grape,  poison  ivy,  and  Virginia creeper are ubiquitous.  With
suitable soil conditions, basswood and silver maple may  in  time
replace the mature coottonwoods.7

    Various    successional   stages   of   riparian   vegetation
communities,  which  are  included  in  Exhibit  III-F-1  in  the
cottonwood  type,  are  developing along the banks of streams and
rivers which flow into the Missouri,  following establishment  by
willows  (sandbar  and black) and cottonwoods, are shrubs such as
coral  berry,  wolfberry,  elder  and  indigobush.    Eventually,
cottonwood,  elm  (red and American), and green ash may comprise a
thin strip of closed canopy vegetation.

              ii. Open Cottonwood

    A sparse  distribution  of  mature  cottonwood  trees  allows
development  of  an  extensive  shrub  layer  often consisting of
roughleaf  dogwood,  indigobush,  prairie  rose,  young   willows
(black,  sandbar,  and  peach-leaved), cottonwoods, and red elms.
Commonly associated with these shrubs are the  non-woody  plants:
cordgrass,  switchgrass, American germander, and sunflowers.

              iii. Mixed Cottonwood

    These  stands  are  comprised of mature cottonwood, boxelder,
green ash,  and peach-leaved willows.

              iv. Willow-Elm-Cottonwood

    Peach-leaved  willow,  red  elm,  and  cottonwood  constitute
canopy species; roughleaf dogwood and poison ivy form a shrub and
vine community.

              v. Basswood-Oak

    Restricted  mostly to upland sites, this forest type  exhibits
a canopy of basswood, red elm, bur and red  oak,  and  hackberry.
Red  oak  predominates mostly along ridges and other xeric sites,
while basswood is restricted to more mesic locations.

              vi. Bur Oak-Elm

    Found on sandy  slopes and bluffs, this forest is dominated by
bur oak, red elm, and an understory of smooth sumac.
                                   111-90

-------
                                                                   o
                                                    LEGEND



                                                  I  COTTONWOOO



                                                  1  OPEN COTTONWOOD



                                                  HI  MIXED COTTONWOOD



                                                  \V  WILLOW-ELM-COTTONWOOO



                                                  V  8ASSWOOD- OAK



                                                 VI  BUR OAK - ELM



                                                 VII  OPEN SHRUB



                                                 VIII  RIPARIAN SHRUB



                                                 IX  BROWNS LAKE MEADOW



                                                 X  SAND DUNE
envirosphere
  company
                                                         IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE  COMPANY  - NEAL UNIT 4
EXISTING NATURAL  FLOODPLAIN  VEGETATION

 SERGEANT BLUFF  TO  WINNEBAGO BEND
                                                                                               SCALE:
EXHIBIT

m-F-1

-------
SIOUX CITY

  IPAL AIRPORT
                          IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - HEAL UNIT 4
                           EXISTING NATURAL FLOODPLAIN VEGETATION
                             SERGEANT BLUFF  TO WINNEBAGO BEND
envirosphere
  company
EXHIBIT
III-F-1
(Cont'd)

-------
              vii. Open Shrub

    Browns Lake open  shrub  evidences  a  few  scattered  mature
cottonwoods,  and consists chiefly of shrub and grass communities
of roughleaf dogwood, smooth sumac,  Kentucky  bluegrass,  switch
grass, and brome grass.

              viii. Riparian Shrub

    This   conglomeration  of  plant  communities  is  constantly
responding to changes in water level and  drainage.  Some  areas,
such as the northern portion of Snyder Bend, are comprised almost
exclusively  of  cottonwood  saplings  and  Equisetum  spp., with
sparsely distributed clumps of  bunch  grass,  willows   (sandbar,
black and peach-leaved), and roughleaf dogwood.

    Sites  recently  inundated  by  the  Missouri  River  exhibit
scattered individuals of cottonwood and willow  (sandbar).

    Areas exposed to standing water for parts  of  the  year  are
characterized by cattails, knotweed, and barnyard grass.

              ix. Browns Lake Meadow

    This  area  has  been  described  as  an  ecocline  of  three
communities:7  where  standing   water   is   present,   cattails
predominate;  rushes  and  sedges occupy moist but less inundated
sites; and golden rod meadow with switch grass and  wild  rye  as
the  dominant  grasses  develops  on  the  most  xeric locations.
Russian olive  and  mulberry  are  common  shrubs  of  the  drier
meadows.

              x. Sand Dune

    Relatively  unique,  this vegetation type is characterized by
large open areas of zones having sparsely distributed  cottonwood
seedlings and shrubs, and colonies of bunch grass.

    2.   Wildlife

         a.   Rare, Endangered, or Threatened Species

    The  Iowa  Conservation  Commission  does  not  know  of  any
threatened  or  endangered terrestial fauna, including waterfowl,
currently residing in  the  vicinity  of  the  proposed  site8,9.
Whistling   swan,  Ross'  goose,  and  golden  eagle,  which  are
generally uncommon in northwestern Iowa*7, utilize the backwaters
of Snyder and Winnebago bends during migration10.   Brant,  which
usually  migrate  along  the  eastern  flyway21,  have  also been
reported in this area10.  Bird species  which  may  be  declining
significantly  in  population  according  to the National Audubon
Society's Blue List11, and which occur along the  Missouri  River
in Iowa, are noted in Table III-F-2.
                                  111-93

-------

Species
Double - crested cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus)
Black - crowned night heron (Nycticorax nycticorax)
Sharp - shinned hawk (Accipiter striatus)
Cooper's hawk (Accipiter cooper ii)
Marsh hawk (Circus cyaneus)
Osprey (Pandion haliaetus)
Prairie falcon (Falco mexicanus)
Pigeon hawk (Falco columbarius)
American kestrel (Falco sparverius)
Piping plover (Charadrius metodus)
Least tern (Sterna albifrons)
Barn owl (Tyto alba)
Burrowing owl (Speotyto cunicularia)
Loggerhead shrike ( Lanius ludovicianus)
Bell's vireo (Vireo bellii)
Grasshopper sparrow (Arnmodramus savannarum)
Status3
Common migrant

Uncommon breeding bird
Uncommon permanent resident
Rare breeding bird

Common migrant, uncommon permanent
resident
Uncommon migrant
Casual
Uncommon migrant



Common breeding bird, uncommon
permanent resident
Rare breeding bird in
western Iowa
Uncommon breeding bird
Rare permanent resident
Rare breeding bird

Uncommon breeding bird, rare permanent
resident
Common breeding bird
Common breeding bird
^ As noted in Brown, '-A
CIOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
BIRD SPECIES OF AUDUBON BLUE LIST
envifOSphere 117 FOUND IN THE IOWA-NEBRASKA
company ~~~ FLOODPLAIN
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED DATE! SCALE:
TABLE
III-F-2
111-94

-------
    Approximately 80 to 100 northern bald eagles are estimated to
winter  in  the  area  of  Snyder Bend 1Z.  The cottonwood forest
vegetation type provides shelter for wintering bald eagles, which
feed on the winter-killed shad found in the oxbow lakes.

         b.   Tall-grass Prairie Community

    Almost the entire land area originally comprising  the  tall-
grass   or   tig  bluestem  prairie  is  presently  utilized  for
agricultural production.  Much of the fauna associated with  this
biome,  therefore,  is  now relatively rare.  Table III-F-3 lists
those mammals originally indigenous  to  the  Neal  site  prairie
area.

    Most  of  the  former  prairie  is  now planted with corn and
soybeans.  Deer from bottom land forests range several miles into
cropland to feed.  Cropland is also utilized by raccoon,  opossum,
badger,  quail,  pheasants,  and   eastern   cottontail.     These
croplands  are  considered  marginal  for  the  latter three game
species due to harsh winters, predator pressure, and the lack  of
cover nesting habitat.12

         c.   Riparian Community

    The riparian community includes  backwaters,  marshlands  and
floodplain  forests  which  border  the Missouri River within the
region of Neal Unit 4.  Table III-F-4 provides density  estimates
for  the  most  important  (recreationally) vertebrates of Snyder
Bend and Browns Lake.

    The floodplain forests can provide shelter and winter  browse
for  a small population of white-tailed deer.19 Several deer have
been observed at the northern end of Snyder Bend on the  site  of
Unit 4. Locally, high densities of bobwhite quail and ring-necked
pheasants   occur  in  the  dense  cottonwood  shrub -  Equisetum
thickets19.  This habitat provides undisturbed winter  cover  and
nesting habitat, both of which are limiting factors for quail and
pheasants in this region of Iowa12.

    Mammals  inhabitating  the  ecotone  along the Missouri River
include  mink,  muskrat,  fceaver  and  badger.   Other  mammalian
residents  of  the  Snyder-Winnebago Bends riparian community, as
reported1o are: fox squirrel, eastern  cottontail,  raccoon,  red
fox,  coyote,  opossum,  striped  skunk,  and  a variety of small
rodents.

    Raptors such as the red-tailed hawk, American kestrel, rough-
legged hawk. Cooper1 s hawk, and great horned  owl  migrate  along
the Missouri River and utilize the cottonwoods for resting sites.
Other  birds  observed  in  the  cottonwood  forest during summer
include the mourning dove, common flicker, easter kingbird,  blue
jay,  black-capped  chickadee, house wren, American robin, yellow
warbler,  common  yellowthroat,  northern  oriole,   and   common
                                  111-95

-------
          Bison (Bison bison)
          Pronghorn antelope  (Antilocapra americana)
          Wolf (Canis  lupus)
          Badger (Taxidea  taxus)
          Blacktail jackrabbit (Lepus  californicus)
          Whitetail jackrabbit (Lepus  townsendi)
          Eastern  cottontail (Sylvilagus  fioridanus)
          Thirteen-lined ground  squirrel (Citellus  tridecemlineatus)
          Deer mouse  (Peromyscus maniculatus)
          White-footed mouse (Peromyscus   leocopus)
          Eastern  spotted skunk  (Spilogale putorius)
          Striped  skunk  (Mephitis mephitis)
          Pocket gopher (Geomys bursarius)
                    i
          Prairie  vole  (Microtus  ochrogaster)
As reported  in Carpenter --J ;  Common  and  Latin names modified  according to
                          16/
Burt  and Grossenheider —'
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. -
MAMMALIAN SPECIES OF THE
GRASS ;3RAIRIE COM;
- NEAL UNIT 4
CENTRAL TALL
•IUNITY
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
III-F-3
                                   111-96

-------
       Species1

White-tail deer (Odocoileus virginianus)
Beaver (Castor canadensis)
Muskrat  (Ondatra zibethicus)
Ring-necked  pheasant (Phasianus colchicus)
Bob-white quail (Colinus  virginianus)
Blue-winged teal   (Anas discors)
Wood duck" (Aix sponsa)
                Density3

1-1.5/100 upland  acresb-  c
1 lodge/3 miles of river'1'  e
0.7/wetland acref< g
0.2-0.3/upland  acrec
1.0  covey/100 acres**
1.0  nesting  pair/5 wetland  areas
1.0  nesting  pair/10 wetland acres
     Values  are  approximate estimates,  provided  by District Wildlife Biologist,
     Neil Heiser 121,.
     Upland acres  includes all  land which  is above  the  cattail zone (without standing water.
     most of the year).
     Winter-season  estimate.
     Value  is approximate estimate provided by  Ken  Baldwin,  ~U  Briar Cliff College,
     Sioux  City, Iowa.
     Yearly  average.
     Wetland acres include all  areas located below the cattail  zone (covered  by  standing  water
     most of the year).
     Early fall-season estimate.
     Summer-season  estimate.
    Latin names according to  Burt and  Grossenheide

envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co, - MEAL UNIT 4
DENSITIES OF IMPORTANT VERTEBRATES OF
SNYDER BEND AND BROWNS LAKE PARKS AREA
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
III-F-4
                                         111-97

-------
grackle20.    Red-winged  blackbirds  and  long-billed marsh wrens
have been observed in the marshland areas of Snyder Bend20.

    Partially inundated zones of the riparian shrub lands support
populations  of  nesting  blue-winged  teal,   wood   duck,   and
mallards7.    Aquatic  plant productivity, especially the emergent
plants bullrush, knotweed,  and  wild  rye,  supports  flocks  of
migrating   shovelers,   gadwalls,   lesser   scaups,   baldpate,
buffleheads, pintails, and green and blue-winged teal13.  Nesting
great  blue  herons  and  pied-billed   grebes,   and   migrating
canvasbacks, and common mergansers, utilized fish, amphibians and
crustaceans for food13.

    Snow, blue, white-fronted, and Canada geese migrate along the
Missouri  Flyway;  the first two often winter at Snyder-Winnebago
Bends7.  Snyder Bend provides 250,000 duck-use days for migrating
waterfowl during a typical fall season12.  Large numbers of  snow
geese and mallards often utilize the floodplain marshes of Snyder
bend.  One  census,  performed  November 17, 1972 at Snyder Bend,
revealed 5500 mallards and HHQQ snow geese12.

    Reptiles and amphibians with ranges including the  Port  Neal
area  are  listed in Table III-F-5.  Particularly common reptiles
are snapping, painted and softshelled turtles,  and  the  eastern
hognose and garter snake  (2 species).10.

         d.   Existing Stresses on Terrestrial Communities

    The encroachment  of  agricultural  operations  resulting  in
artificial  drainage  of riparian habitat and thus affecting more
area of existing natural communities, may represent the  greatest
presently  occurring  stress  on  the biological system near Neal
Unit 4.  Exhibit III-F-1 depicts the rarity of  remaining  blocks
of  cottonwood  forest  and  floodplain  forest in general.  This
paucity  of  large  areas  of   undisturbed   wildlife   habitat,
particularly   forest   habitat,  increases  the  sensitivity  of
terrestrial species to additional  environmental  stresses  which
interefere with animal behavior.

    Drought, by acting as a differential natural selection agent,
may also affect animal and plant abundance.
                                  111-98

-------








	 -*
Species (3)
Common snapping turtle
1 .use map turtle
Ouaclu'a map turtle


Wesu i '' panned untie
Ornate box turtle
HlaiuJinj/s turtle
Smooth soitshen tin


le
Hf-d::;; sprim' sottshell turtle
(



I j>tc>;; -,pnng solishcil turtle
Nerrhern prairie skuik
Ki\e lined skmk

Six-lined rjn' runnel
Northern water snake
Western plains ganer snake



















(
Red- sided garter snake
Wes'ern nbbon snake
Northern lined snake
I astern hogno>e snake
Prairie inigneck snake
Lasicrn \.:llo>.v-bellied racer
Western siuooih green snake
Bullstiake
Wesiern to\ snake
Red milk snake
Prairie rattlesnake




Lasteni tiger salamander
Plains spadetoot

Roek\ mountain toad
Great plains toad

Eastern gray treetrog
Blanchard's cricket trog
Western chorus trog
Boreal chorus Irog


Northern leopard trog
Latin Name
Chelydra serpentina
Ciraptemys pseudographica
Graptemys pseudographica ouachitensis
Chrysemys picta belli
lerrapene ornata ornata
-him doidea blandingi
Irionyx muticus
Irionyx spmit'er nartwegi
"lrioM>\ spiniler spiniler
l-.umeces septentrionalis septentrionaiis
F'Aimeces iasciatus
C nemidophorus sexlineatus
Natrix sipedon sipedon
Ihamnophis radix haydeni
Storena occipitomaculata
Ihamnophis sauritus proxnmis
1 ropidoclomon lineatum Imeatum
Helerodon platyrhinos
Diadoplu> punctatus arnyi
(olubci constrictor llaviventris
Opheodrys vernalis blanchardi
Pituophis melanoleucus sayi
l-laphe xulpina vulpina
Lampropeltis dohata s>spila
( rotalus vindis viridis
Ambystoma tigrmum tigrinum
Scaplnopus bombilrons
But'o woodhoLi.sei woodliousei
liut'o cognatus
Hyla versicolor versicolor
Acns crepitans blanchardi
Pseudacris tnseriata trisenata
Pseudacns triseriata maculta
Rana pipiens pipiens


































.'V> recorded in Corunt - .
o
envirosphere
company
* DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPOSA'tD
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4

REPTILIAN AND AMPHIBIAN SPECIES WITH TABLE
RANGES INCLUDING PORT NEAL AREA III-F-5
DATE: SCALE:
111-99

-------
G.  HISTORIC, SCENIC, AND RECREATIONAL SITES

    The history of the vicinity of  the  proposed  site  and  the
recreational  and scenic development of the surrounding territory
is tied to the Missouri River  and  the  associated  use  of  the
shorelands.   The first complete exploration of the Missouri River
occurred  between 1804 and 1806 when Meriwether Lewis and William
Clark  undertook  the  officially  sanctioned  Lewis  and   Clark
Expedition.    Since  that time, the river and abutting lands have
undergone intensive periods of  use  for  settlements,  commerce,
transportation,  and agricultural development.  More recently the
river area has been  developed  for  multipurpose  use,  such  as
navigation,  irrigation and flood control, the production of goods
and services, and scenic and recreation uses.

    The following discussions, will present information regarding
the  historic  background  of the general site area, the historic
and archaeological sites in  the  general  region,  the  existing
parks  and  recreational  areas  in the region, and the status of
proposals for additional recreational areas.

    1.   Historical Background of the Site Area

    The history of the Missouri River flood plain in the vicinity
of the proposed site has been greatly affected by the  continuous
relocation  of the river channel.  Through a cycle of erosion and
deposition,   the  Missouri  developed  oxbow  bends  which   were
subsequently  cut  off,  forming  shallow  lakes  and  eventually
becoming  dry  land.   This  process  occurred  rapidly  and  was
repeated many times in the region surrounding Neal Unit 4.

    The cycle has been documented by explorers, river navigators,
and  scientific  parties  since  the late 1700fs.  In more recent
times man has become the major  cause  of  both  realignment  and
channel stabilization.

    The process of river realignment and the corresponding change
in  adjacent  lands  has been responsible for the following three
major historical consequences in the area of the  proposed  site:
the creation of nearby oxbow lakes; the irregularity of the state
boundary  between  Iowa  and  Nebraska;  and  the  difficulty  in
identification of past historical sites.

         a.   The Creation of Nearby Oxbow Lakes

    Several nearby oxbow lakes are present in  the  area  of  the
site,  including  Winnebago Lake and Snyder Lake  (closest to Neal
U).  These lakes and their surrounding areas of  sandbar,  willow
bar,  and  marsh were created by man-made action in 1962 when the
straightening of the Missouri River channel cut  off   the  oxbows
from the remainder of the river.
                                  HI-100

-------
         b.    Irregularity of the State Boundary

    Another recent example of the effect of river action concerns
the  precise  location  of  the   state   boundary.     The   1943
Iowa-Nebraska  Boundary Commission established the official state
boundary as the middle of  the  then  stabilized  Missouri  River
channel.   Once  established, however, the navigation channel has
been altered in several  places,  notably  downstream  from  Neal
Unit 4,  shifting  land once on the Nebraska side of the river to
the east side of the present channel.

         c.    Difficulty   in Identification of Past   Historical
              Sites

    Because  of  the  continuous  process  of  relocation  of the
channel of the river, past records, historic sites,  and  stopping
places  along the river are difficult to locate.  The process has
resulted in an uncertainty on the location of some past  recorded
events, and the river action has probably removed other sites.1

    The  first  white traders and explorers used the Missouri for
commerce and transportation, but only temporary  camp  sites  and
trading  posts  were placed within reach of the river.  The Lewis
and Clark Expedition is known to have set up camp in the vicinity
of the proposed site, probably west of present day  Browns  Lake.
However,  all  traces of this temporary camp have been destroyed,
most likely as a result of past river action.

    Between the 1820*s and the Civil  War  period,  the  Missouri
River   was   the   main   means   of  access  for  supplies  and
transportation from the Mississippi River into the frontier West.
After the advent  of  the  railroads,  additional  areas  of  the
countryside  were  opened up, as was the case with the subsequent
widespread use of the automobile.

    Agricultural development did not make use of the flood  plain
land  until  the  late  1920's,  when  work  was begun on channel
stabilization.  Historic sites along  the  river  have  therefore
been  at a minimum, except at major nodes of river transportation
activity and at major river crossing points.

    The portion of the Missouri River near the proposed  site  is
part of the river's major navigation system developed after World
War  II  under  the  Pick-Sloan  Plan.  This navigational channel
stretches from the river*s mouth to its terminus in Sioux City.

    2.   Historic and Archaelogical Sites

    Coordination with state and local historic offices led to the
identification  of   seven   known   sites   of   historical   or
archeological  interest  in  the  two-county area of Neal Unit 4.
For Woodbury County, Iowa, the Division of Historic  Preservation
of  the  Iowa  state  Historical  Department*  and the Sioux City
                                  III-101

-------
Public Museum3 identified three historic sites which  are  on  the
National Register* while one other is nominated for the Register.

    The  three National Register sites in Woodbury County are all
located in Sioux City.  The Sergeant Floyd Monument, which  is  a
national  landmark, is a 100-foot obelisk commemorating the Lewis
and  Clark  Expedition.   Floyd,  who  was  a  co-leader  of  the
expedition,  died  of  an  illness  in  1806  as  the  expedition
proceeded up the Missouri River.

    The Sioux City Central High  School  on  Nebraska  Street  is
commemorated   for   its  Gothic  Revival  architecture  and  its
contribution to education.  In use from 1892 to 1972, it is Sioux
City's oldest community high school.

    The Woodbury County Courthouse is of historical  significance
because   of   its   architecture  and  architectural  sculpture.
Designed by Steele, Purcell  &  Elmslie,  it  is  considered  the
largest  public  Prairie  School style building.  This courthouse
has been in use since it was built in 1918.

    The two National Register sites in Dakota County are Emmanuel
Lutheran Church in Dakota City, and Homer village,  northeast  of
Homer.5   The  Emmanuel  Lutheran Church in Hickory Street, Dakota
City, was built in 1860 and may  be  Nebraska's  oldest  Lutheran
Church  still  standing.   The  Church's  Greek Revival frame and
structure  has  been  virtually  unaltered.   Homer  Village,  or
Ton-Wan-Tonga,  is  an  archaeological  site last occupied by the
Omaha Indians around  1800.  The  home  of  Chief  Blackbird,  the
Village  was visited in 1796 by James McKay, a fur trader, and in
1804 by Lewis and Clark.

    The O'Connor House, south of Dakota City, is a site which has
been nominated for the National  Register.   It  is  a  two-story
Italianate  house  constructed  by Captain Cornelius O'Connor, c.
1875.

    In addition to these National Register sites. Fort Charles,  a
fur-trading post set up by James McKay, is  known  to  have  been
located  on  a knoll or rise in the vicinity of Homer.  The exact
site has not yet been  determined.

    All of the sites described above are a minimum of seven miles
away from Neal Unit 4, and there  are  no  reported  historic  or
archaeological sites  in the immediate vicinity of Neal Unit 4.

    In  May 1973, a historical, archeological and cultural survey
was conducted and included air and  surface  examinations  of  the
nearby proposed Snyder - Winnebago  Bends Recreation Areas for the
U.S.   Corps   of   Engineers.1   No   evidence   of  historical,
archeological or cultural activity  was found in the area.
                                 III-102

-------
    The  following  is  a  listing  and  brief   description   of
additional  sites  in  Dakota  County  identified by the Historic
Preservation Office of the Nebraska State Historic  Societys  and
the  Dakota  County Historical Society* as being historically and
archeologically significant:

         •    Bobier site - c.1400-1450 A.D.

    Prehistoric aboriginal  earth  lodge  site  assigned  to  St.
Helena  Focus.   This  site  is located approximately 4 1/2 miles
southeast of Homer.

         •    Nelson Site - c.1400 A.D.

    Earth lodge village located approximately one mile  northwest
of Homer.

         •    Ryan Site

    Prehistoric and historic woodland burial mound, located  just
southeast of Homer.

         •    Site 2SDK 18

    Southeast of Homer, is reportedly a Winnebago trading post.

         •    Combs Schoolhouse

    Erected  in  1857,  it  is  the   only   remaining   one-room
schoolhouse  in  Dakota  County.  It is located near the O'Connor
House, south of Dakota City.

    The following is a listing of additional  sites  in  Woodbury
County  identified  by  the Sioux City Public Museum as worthy of
preservation:

         •    The War Eagle Monument

    It is located on a high bluff above the  Missouri,  near  the
place  where  the  Sioux  River empties into it.  War Eagle was a
Sioux Indian chief who was friendly to the white  settlers.   His
son-in-law,  Theophile  Bruguier,  is  recognized as Sioux City's
first white settler, having built a cabin on  the  banks  of  the
Sioux in 1849.

         •    Prospect Hill Monument to a Prayer Meeting

    Commemorates a prayer meeting held  on  Prospect  Hill   (high
bluff  on  Sioux City's west side with a fine view of Iowa, South
Dakota and Nebraska) on April 29,  1869,  by  three  Presbyterian
ministers.   One  of  them,  the Reverend Sheldon Jackson, was so
inspired by this experience  that  he  persuaded  his  church  to
appoint  him  Superintendent  of  Missions to the Western states.
The monument was erected in 1913.
                                102a

-------
         •    Monument to Cordua and Roberts

    This marker is near the spot where two pioneer Sioux Cityans,
Henry Cordua and Thomas Roberts, were  murdered  by  the  Indians
while  cultivating  their  potato  field on July 9, 1861.  It was
dedicated October 13, 1928, by the Woodbury County  Pioneer  Club
and is located on the Correctionville Road, old Highway 20, about
three  and  one half miles east of Sioux City.  The crime alerted
Sioux Cityans to the ever  present  danger  of  the  Indians  and
prompted them to beef up their home guard.

         •    First Bride's Grave

    Grave site of Rosalie Menard Leonais, of  French  and  Indian
descent,  believed by some to be Sioux City's first bride.  It is
located on a bluff across from the Floyd Monument on  Highway  75
south.

         »    The Peirce House

    Present site of Sioux City Public Museum.  It  was  built  by
John  Peirce  in  1891-1892  of  South  Dakota  quartzite  at  an
estimated cost of $80,000.  Mr.  Peirce  has  been  described  as
Sioux  City's  most  energetic  and ambitious developer, and this
house was built to impress eastern investors  with  Sioux  City's
potential  for  growth.   Throughout the years the house has been
owned by various families, the most  prominent  having  been  the
T.S.  Martin's,  one of Sioux City's foremost merchants.  In 1960
the house was purchased by the Junior League of  Sioux  City  for
$10,000 and donated to the city for a public museum.

    According  to  the  Division  of Historic Preservation of the
State Historical Department of  Iowa,  there  have  been  no  new
submissions of sites for nomination to the National Register.

    None  of  the  known  historical  sites in either Woodbury or
Dakota Counties are expected to  be  adversely  affected  by  the
proposed project.
                                    102b

-------
    3.   Existing Parks and Recreation Areas

    There are presently several  recreational  areas  and  scenic
attractions in the general Sioux City-Missouri River vicinity and
in   the   area   of   the  proposed  site.   These  areas  offer
opportunities  for   water-oriented   activities,   camping   and
picnicking,  trail-oriented  activities,  sightseeing and general
recreational activities.

    In 1970, Woodbury County had an estimated 2874 total acres of
federal, state, county,  and  municipal  parks  and  recreational
areas.   In  addition, Dakota County, Nebraska had three existing
areas,   and   the   surrounding   region   provided   additional
recreational opportunities.

    In the portion of the Missouri River region where Neal Unit U
is  to  be  located,  the  following six recreation resources are
considered significant  (see Exhibit III-G-1):

    •    two parks of regional importance, one north (Stone State
         Park), the other south (Lewis  and  Clark  State  Park),
         each in excess of 15 miles from the proposed site

    •    three locally important parks, located east (Browns Lake
         State Park), southeast (Snyder Bend  County  Park),  and
         northwest  (Omadi  Bend  State  Recreation  Area) of the
         proposed site.

    •    one state game management  area  and  undeveloped  state
         park  (Winnebago  State Park), located immediately south
         of the proposed site.

    In addition, both  Nebraska  and  Iowa  have  wayside  areas,
stopping  points,  municipal  parks,  and  other  areas  of local
importance in the general region.

    Recreation information for parks of regional  importance  and
parks  outside  the  immediate area of the proposed site has been
included for completeness.  More detailed information on existing
facilities is available in the recreation and open space plans of
the Iowa Conservation Commission,  the  Nebraska  Game  and  Parks
Commission,   and  the  comprehensive  plans  of  the  individual
counties.

         a.   Stone State Park

    This state park in the northern Sioux City area is visited by
an estimated 275 thousand visitors from  the  region  each  year.
Located  approximately  17 miles upstream from the proposed site,
the park provides facilities for  campsites,  lodging,   trailers,
picnicking,  fishing,  as  well  as  horseback  riding and hiking
trails.  The park's 918 acres overlook the Big Sioux River  above
the point where it joins the Missouri.
                                  III-103

-------
                   OMADI BEND
              STATE RECREATION AREA
                                                           IOWA
           NEBRASKA
                              PROPOSED
                              NEAL UNIT 4
   NOTE'
       LOCATIONS OF PARKS ARE
       APPROXIMATE ONLY.
                                                   BROWNS LAKE
                                                   STATE PARK
                              SNYDER BEND
                              'COUNTY PARK
                             WINNEBAGO BEND STATE PARK
                              8 MANAGEMENT AREA
                                N
                                                        LEWIS AND CLARK
                                                         STATE PARK\
                                                                        ONAWA
                                                                        CITY
                     10
        15
               MILES
       A
   envlrospnere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
 REGIONAL  RECREATIONAL  AREAS
                      DATE:
             SCALE:

            III-104
 EXHIBIT
m-G-i

-------
         b.   Lewis and Clark State Park

    The park, located 20 miles south of  Neal  Unit 4  in  Monona
county,  is  the  eighth-most  used state park in Iowa.  The Iowa
Conservation Commission estimated that 1973 attendance  was  more
than 315,000.  In terms of the combination of regional importance
and proximity to the site, the park can be regarded as a southern
counterpart  to  Stone State Park.  Facilities include provisions
for boating, fishing, campsites,  shelter,  lodging,  picnicking,
and trailers.

         c.   Omadi Bend State Recreation Area

    Ihis park is operated by the Nebraska Game,  Fish  and  Parks
Commission  and  is  situated  on 33 acres of land adjacent to an
oxbow remnant  of  the  Missouri  River,  approximately  5  miles
northwest  of  the  proposed  site.   The park is accessible from
Homer, Nebraska, and the area to the west and south.  The present
fcscilities include cookout grills,  picnic  tables,  and  a  boat
ramp.

         d.   Browns Lake  (Bigelow Park)

    Situated on the southeast shore of Brown's Lake, due west  of
Salix,  Iowa, the park is state owned and is operated and managed
by Woodbury County.  The park is located about two miles east  of
the  proposed  site  on a shallow oxbow lake.  Facilities include
provisions  for  boating,  fishing,  picnicking,  swimming,   and
qeneral recreational activities.
      Browns Lake (P-iaelov? Park) has  received  fnndinrr  assistance
  fron the Land and Water Conservation Fund.  This funrb'prr has been
  used  to  develop  the par!-'s recreational facilities.  Therefore
  the park's land is subject to the provisions of Section  P(f)  of
  the  Land  and  Fater  Conservation  Fund  T'ct, as amended, which
  requires  that  chanaina  land  fron  recreational  use  must  be
  approved by the Secretary of tho Interior.

         e.   Snyder Eend County Park

    Snyder  Bend  Park,   operated   by   the   Woodbury   County
Conservation Commission, provides an area of 34 acres of parkland
and  access  roads,  located  about  one  mile  southeast  of the
proposed  site.   Existing  facilities  include  provisions   for
boating,   fishing,   picnicking,   camping,  field  sports,  and
swimming.  The park is situated on the  shores  of  Snyder  Lake,
which  was  created  in  1962  through relocation of the Missouri
River channel.  Boats are not allowed on the lake after September
15 of each year, at which time a portion of the lake  is  managed
as a waterfowl refuge.

         f.   Kinnebago Bend State Park and Management Area

    Located on the oxbow lake south of Snyder Lake, the Winnebago
Bend park area is approximately 5 miles  south  of  the  proposed
site.   The  park  area itself is undeveloped.  The oxbow lake is
managed by the Iowa Conservation Commission as a game  management
area.   Existing  use  of  the  overall  area is light, primarily
focusing on fishing, hunting, and sightseeing.


                                 III-105

-------
    4.   Status of Proposals for Snyder-Winnebaqo Bends
         Recreation Areas

    Since the creation of the Snyder  and  Winnebago  Bend  oxbow
lakes  in  1962,  there has been a series of proposals concerning
additional park and recreation facilities in this general  region
of   the   Missouri,  as  well  as  concerning  the  enlargement,
consolidation, and reorganization of  existing  facilities.    The
development  of  the  proposed  Snyder-Winnebago Bends recreation
areas has been variously modified, suspended, and  revised  as  a
result of the changing situation concerning: the boundary dispute
between Iowa and Nebraska, the ownership claims and participatory
rights  of  the  Winnebago  Indian  Tribe,  and  the arrangements
concerning the precise properties,  facilities,  and  development
schedule to be utilized.

    Under present development plans, the proposed recreation area
will  be  created  by  the  combination  of  Snyder Bend lake and
Winnebago Bend  lake,  and  the  consolidation  of  the  existing
recreation facilities around them.

    Major new improvements to be undertaken include: a connecting
channel  between  the two oxbow lakes; the construction of levees
between the Missouri River and the two cutoff channels;  and  the
construction   of   water   control  structures  for  the  lakes:
Recreational development is planned  to  include  facilities  for
camping,  hiking,  picnicking,  swimming,  fishing  and horseback
riding in addition to the  provision  of  access  roads,  parking
areas  and sewage disposal facilities.  It is planned that motor-
boating and related water sports activities will  take  place  in
the  Winnebago  oxbow lake, while less intensive recreational use
along with fish and wildlife resource improvement will  be  goals
for Snyder Lake.

    Regulations   concerning   farming   or  private  development
activities on lands adjacent to the park have not been developed.

    Original  proposals  for the park occurred  in   1963  and   1964
when  the initial project design was prepared under the authority
of  the  Corps  of  Engineers.   The  designs  were   temporarily
postponed, but were revised several years later. In January 1968,
the   State  of  Iowa  agreed  to  act  as the local sponsor.  The
Nebraska Game and Parks  Commission officially agreed  in  February
1969   to   participate   in   the  project  and   to  assume  its
proportionate share of   costs  for  development,   operation,  and
maintenance of  the  project.

    At this stage,  the  plans for  the proposed recreation area are
progressing.    Land    acquisition   began   in  March  1970,  and
construction  plans  and  specifications were  completed  and  sent out
for bid  in May  1970.  Plans for   the  proposed  park  were  again
suspended,  however,  in June  1970, because of objections  by the
Winnebago Indians concerning the  right of  government   to  acquire
Indian lands  without  the consent  of the  Tribe.
                                  Ill-106

-------
    The  plans  for  the  proposed  park were again proceeding by
January 1973, and a tentative  agreement  was  reached  with  the
Winnebago  Indians  in  May 1973.  Since that time, the scheduled
development  of  the  proposed  park  has  undergone   additional
revisions  and alterations, and the area enclosed in the proposed
park has been slightly modified.

    The recreational park project  is  proposed  to  be  a  joint
undertaking  between  the  U.S.  Army  Corps  of Engineersv Omaha
District, and the State of Iowa, State  Conservation  Commission.
The Federal responsibility would include initial land acquisition
and  the  construction  of  a  protective  levee,  water  control
structures, and initial facilities.  The State of  Iowa,  as  the
local  sponsor,  would be responsible for the provision of access
roads and for operating and maintaining the recreation facilities
for the life of the  project.   Project  development  costs  were
proposed  to  be  divided  50  percent each, with the State share
primarily comprising  State  land  contributions,  including  the
existing recreation facilities in the area, described above.
                                  III-107

-------
H.  LAND AND TRANSPORTATION

    1.    General Existing Land Use
    The existing land use of the area  surrounding  the  proposed
site, shown in Exhibit Ill-H-1,  was investigated in the following
four  regions - listed in terms  of decreasing area and increasing
detail:

         •    The four county region,  defined  as  WOodbury  and
              Monona  Counties,   Iowa,  and  Dakota  and Thurston
              Counties, Nebraska - 2213 square miles.

         •    The Sioux City  Standard  Metropolitan  Statistical
              Area (SMSA) - 1126 square miles.

         •    Woodbury County, Iowa - 871 square miles.

         •    The site study area - 160 square miles.

    Existing land use within the four county area - Woodbury  and
Monona  Counties  in  Iowa,  and  Dakota and Thurston Counties in
Nebraska - is primarily  devoted  to  agriculture.   Agricultural
production  accounts  for  approximately  90 percent of the total
land  area  of  the  counties.   Within  the  site  study   area,
approximately  76  percent  of  the total land area is devoted to
agricultural use with another 20  percent  belonging  to  forest,
grassland,  marsh,  and vacant lands.  The remaining 4 percent of
available land is accounted for by other represented land uses of
the area including: industrial,  public, commercial,  residential,
and  urban.   Existing  land  use  within  the  site  study area,
expressed in acres and percent of total study area, is  given  in
Table III-H-1.

    2.   Agriculture

    Within the four county regional  area  90.5  percent  of  the
total  land area is devoted to agricultural production, including
all types of croplands, orchards, and grazing lands as  indicated
in  Table  III-H-2..   Some  of  the more important crops produced
within this area include: field corn, soybeans, hay, sorghum, and
other grains and vegetables.  Major  livestock  produced  include
cattle  and  calves,  hogs  and  pigs,  and,  to a lesser extent,
poultry, sheep and lambs.  Intensive agriculture takes  place  in
the  Missouri  River  valley  and on the surrounding hills of the
four county region, with grazing lands found on the  steeper  and
less suitable lands.

    A  breakdown  of  the agricultural statistics within Woodbury
County revealed that, as of the 1969 Census of Agriculture,  92.7
percent  of  the  total  land  area  was  designated  for farm or
farm-related uses.  Total cropland for all purposes accounted for
approximately  84.5  percent  of  this  amount,  while  harvested
cropland totaled 55.1 percent, and cropland used only for pasture
                                 III-108

-------
e
envirosphere
company
A ^::*.o: OF [BAiCO :i t.'CF- ',•;> oa"OaA-EC
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
EXISTING LAND
DATE:
- NEAL UNIT 4
USE MAP
SCALE:
EXHIBIT
m-H- 1

-------

Land Use Category
Agriculture
Industrial
Public (Airports, Schools, Churches, Etc.)
Commercial
Residential
Urban \
Cemetery
Parks and Recreation
Forest, Grassland, Marsh and Vacant
Total Land Area

Acres
78,292
496
895
114
349
860
96
424
21,075
102,601
Percent of
Total
76.31
0.48
0.87
0.11
0.34
0.84
0.09
0.42
20.54
100.00
c
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION Of E8ASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
EXISTING LAND USE WITHIN THE
NEAL SITE AREA
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
III-H-1
III-110

-------




























Woodbury County.



Iowa
Monona County, Iowa
Dakota County. Nebraska
Thurston County, Nebraska
Total Four County Region





Four County Region
Total Land in Farms Percent
Land Area (Inc. Woodland & of
(Sq Miles) Grazing Land) Total
870.7 806.8 92.7
699.2 . 636.7 91.1
255.4 223.9 87.7
387.5 336.2 86.8
2,212.8 2,003.6 90.5

Detailed Classification,



Woodbury County


Unincorporated Area:
Agriculture
Transportation. Commercial & Utilities
Industrial


Commercial
Residentia


Public & Semi-Public
Undeveloped Open Space
Subtotal
Incorporated Cities & Towns
Total Woodbury County

Acres
•
502,517
13.873
753
34
145
961
9.888
528.171
39,711
567,882
Percent
of Total

88.7
2.4
0.1
--
-
0.2
1.7
93.1
6.9
100.0















Source: U S Bureau of the Census, 1969 Census of Agriculture (Top);
General Development Plan, Woodbury County, Iowa, 1970 (Bottom).
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
EXISTING LAND USE IN THE FOUR TABLE
COUNTY REGION, AND ,,,„->
WOODBURY COUNTY, IOWA in-H-2
DATE:
SCALE:
Ill-Ill

-------
or  grazing  accounted  for 12.3 percent.   The major agricultural
crops produced are representative of those in  production  within
the four county region, with vegetables and fruits being of minor
importance.   Livestock  production  in  Woodbury  County,  on the
other hand, accounts for more poultry farms than the other   three
counties  of  Monona in Iowa and Dakota and Thurston in Nebraska.
Additional information on agricultural production can be found in
Appendix Tables A-III-H -1 and A-III-H-2.

    Existing agricultural land  use  within  the  immediate  site
vicinity  includes intensive production within the Missouri River
valley and surrounding hillsides, with some forests  and grazing
lands   occupying  the  steeper,  less  usable  slopes.  However,
livestock grazing and poultry production are minimal  within  the
site study area.

    3.   Industrial

    Industrial  land  use  within  the  four  county  study  area
includes manufacturing enterprises, mainly electronic components,
tools,  beef  products,  and chemical and food processing plants.
Most of these industrial establishments are located in or  within
the  vicinity  of Sioux City, especially along the Missouri River
where the land is relatively flat and water is readily  available
for industrial purposes.

    The Port Neal Industrial District comprises almost 3000 acres
of  relatively  flat land along the bank of the Missouri River in
Woodbury County.  Some of  the  industries  represented  in  this
district  include  Iowa  Public  Service Company, Borden Chemical
Company, Iowa Beef  Processors,  Terra  Chemicals  International,
Inc.,  Kind  &  Knox Gelatin, Inc., and Farmland Industries.  The
existing George Neal Steam Electric Station is located within the
heart of this Industrial District.   The  Neal  Unit  1  site  is
located  approximately  one  and three quarter miles south  of the
existing units.

    4.   Commercial

    Commercial  development  within  the  four  county  area   is
primarily  limited  to  the  vicinity of Sioux City and the South
Sioux City area, and along the major roads and  highways  leading
in  and  out  of  these  urban centers.  Most commercial activity
outside of the cities and towns is confined to  highway  oriented
services,  such as service stations, motels, drive-in restaurants
and theaters, etc.  In Woodbury County, commercial development is
located  primarily  along  Highway  20  between  Sioux  City  and
Moville.   Smaller  commercial  centers  are found in most of the
unincorporated towns.  Additional information on  industrial  and
commercial   establishments   is  presented  in  Appendix  Tables
A-III-H-3 and A-III-H-H.
                                  Ill-112

-------
    5.   Public and Semipublic

    Public and semipublic uses include such  forms  as  airports,
schools,  churches, parks, government buildings, etc.   Within the
four county area most of these uses are found within the vicinity
of Sioux City and South Sioux City.  The  principal  public  land
use  within  the  site  vicinity  is  the  Sioux  City  Municipal
Airport - approximately 6 miles south of Sioux City and  about  7
miles  north  of  the plant site along the Missouri River.  Other
public and semipublic uses are located near some of the  outlying
residential  areas  in the vicinity of the towns of Salix, Dakota
City, and Crystal Lake.   Additional  information  on  parks  and
recreational areas was presented in Section III-G.

    6.   Residential

    Residential areas outside of urban clusters are  concentrated
in  the  four county region along the fringes of the metropolitan
areas, and within  the  smaller  unincorporated  towns.   In  the
immediate  site area there are some 349 acres of residential area
or less than one percent of the total  study  area.   Residential
clusters  are  located  to  the  east of Sergeant Bluff, south of
Sioux City, scattered around the perimeter of Crystal  Lake,  and
clustered  along  the  southeast  shore of Browns Lake, about one
mile to the east of the proposed site.

    7.   Urban

    Urban lands within the vicinity of the proposed site comprise
0.8 percent of the total land area, or about 860 acres  of  land.
Urban  areas include portions of Sioux City and South Sioux City,
all of Dakota City, Sergeant Bluff, and Salix.  The  urban  areas
are  located  within  the  Missouri River valley except for Sioux
City which is partially built  upon  the  Missouri  River  bluffs
along the east bank of the river.

    8.   Transportation

    Major transportation routes  within  the  surrounding  region
include  the  north-south Interstate Highway, 1-29, which extends
along the Missouri River valley.  The route passes through Omaha,
Nebraska and Sioux City, Iowa, as well as  other  Missouri  River
communities.   At  its closest point, Interstate 29 passes within
2-1/2 miles east of Neal Unit 4.

    The major east-west highway route is Highway 20 which  passes
through  Sioux  City,  and  continues  east  to  Fort  Dodge  and
Waterloo, and west  across  the  Missouri  River  into  Nebraska.
Within  the  immediate site area, a system of paved roads extends
south from the town of Sergeant Bluff,  and  existing  roads  are
present to the north and east of the proposed site boundaries.

    Rail   transportation  within  the  four  county  study  area
includes the  Chicago,  Milwaukee,  St.  Paul  and  Pacific;  the
                                 III-113

-------
Chicago  and  Northwestern;  the  Burlington  Northern;  and  the
Illinois Central Railroads - all serving  the  Sioux  City  area.
The Chicago and Northwestern tracks parallel Interstate 29 to the
east of the site, and a spur which serves the existing Neal units
and  the Port Neal Industrial district is readily available to be
extended and utilized for Neal Unit 4.
                                  III-114

-------
I.  DEMOGRAPHY

    The discussion of demography includes  an  analysis  of  past
population  trends,  the  composition,  distribution,  and various
other demographic characteristics of the current population,  and
projections   of  future  population.   Areas  of  focus  include
Woodbury County, the region within 10 miles of the proposed site,
the four counties surrounding the proposed site, and  the  region
within a 100 mile radius of the proposed site.

    1.   Population History

    Woodbury  County  experienced  continuous   and   significant
population  growth earlier in this century.  This is presented in
Table III-I-1 which lists the decennial  population  counts  from
1900  to 1970 for Woodbury County, the Sioux City urbanized area,
and the rural portion of Woodbury County.  From 1900 to 1930, the
County's  population  increased  from  56,610  to  101,669.   The
statistics  indicate  that  this 46.3 percent increase was due to
the growth of  the  Sioux  City  urbanized  area  as  opposed  to
population  changes  in  the  rural part of the county.  In fact,
during  that  period,  the  population  of  the  urbanized   area
increased by 139 percent while the rural area grew by less than 5
percent.  Since the 1930 Census, however, the county1s population
grew  slowly  to  a  peak  reflected  in the 1960 Census and then
declined by the 1970 federal count to a point below that recorded
in 1940.  An  examination  of  Table  III-I-1  reveals  that  the
pattern  of the past 40 years was caused by a significant loss of
rural population to the Sioux City urbanized area.

    In 1900, the rural area of  Woodbury  County  comprised  39.4
percent of the total county population.  By 1930, this percentage
was  reduced  to  17.3  percent.   The 1970 statistics revealed a
further decline to 16.9 percent.  Table III-I-2  illustrates  the
changes  that  have  occurred  in the urban and rural populations
from 1930 to 1970.

    Table  III-I-3  presents  decennial  population  counts   and
forecasts  from  1920  through  1990  for Woodbury County and the
three counties that are within 10 miles  of  the  proposed  site.
Woodbury  County  is  significantly  more  populous  than Monona,
Dakota, or Thurston counties.  Among these counties  only  Dakota
County  registered  a  substantial population increase during the
past half century  (71 percent).

    2.   Current Demographic Characteristics

    There are eight named places within  10 miles of the  proposed
site.   Exhibit  III-1-1  shows  a  map  of this area and a table
listing the 1970 populations  and  positions  of  each  of  these
places  relative  to  the  proposed site.  These places ranged in
1970 population from approximately 50  (Luton) to  1153   (Sergeant
Bluff).   Salix  had  a  1970 population of 387.  Exhibit III-I-2
shows the positions of centers of over   10,000  population  which
                                  III-115

-------
Year
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
Woodbury County
Rural
21,499
19,788
20,944
22,486
21,263
19.926
18,690
15.973
Sioux City
Urbanized Area
33,111
47.828
71,227
79,183
82,364
83,991
89,159
87,079
Total
54,610
67.616
92,171
• 101,669
103,627
103,917
107,849
103,052
Source:   Past population  counts provided by  U S Bureau  of the Census  1973 data
         are provisional estimates  for July  1, provided-by the U S Bureau of the Census.

         Projected  populations from  the Iowa State Office of  Planning and  Programming
         (Des Moines, Iowa), 1973, and the University of Nebraska. Bureau of Business
         Research (Lincoln.  Nebraska), 1973.
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. - NEAL UNIT 4
WOODBURY COUNTY POPULATION TREND
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IH-I-1
                                    III-116

-------
Year
1930
1940
% Change
1950
% Change
1960
% Change
1970
% Change
Woodbury County
Sioux City
Urbanized Area
79,183
82,364
+4.0
83,991
+2.0
89.159
+6.2
87.079
2.3
Rural
22,486
21,260
-5.5
19,926
-6.2
18,690
-6.2
15,973
-14.5
Total
101,669
103,627
+1.9
• 103,917
+0.3
107,849
+3.8
103,052
-4.4
Source:   U  S Bureau of the Census
         General Population  Characteristics
         PC(1)-B17  Iowa
o
envirosphere
company
ft DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. - NEAL UNIT 4
URBAN AND RURAL POPULATION CHANGES
IN WOODBURY COUNTY, 1930-1970
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
III-I-2
                            III-117

-------
Year
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1974
1975
1980
1985
1990
Woodbury Co.
92,171
101,669
103,627
103,917
107,849
103,052
103,800
108,800
114,400
120,700
126,400
Dakota Co. (Neb)
7,694
9,505
9,836
10,401
12,168
13,137
14,800
14,401
15,391
16,236
16,925
Thurston Co. (Neb)
9,589
10,462
10,243
8,590
7,237
6,935
7,300
6,681
6,559
6,603
6,733
Monona Co.
17,125
18,213
18,238
16,303
13,916
12,069
11,900
12,700
13,200
13,900
14,500
Source:   Past population counts provided by U S Bureau of the Census 1974 data are provisional
         estimates for July 1,  provided by the U S Bureau  of the Census.
         Projected populations from  the Iowa State Office of Planning and Programming
         (Des Moines, Iowa), 1975, and the University of Nebraska, Bureau of Business
         Research (Lincoln,  Nebraska), 1973.
A
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
PAST AND PROJECTED POPULATION
(COUNTIES WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE
NEAL SITE)
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
III-I-3
                                      III-118

-------
    IRCDAK
    [LEGEND
       United States

   \J  Interstate

  CD State Route
                                                                      10 MILES
PLACE
Salix
Sergeant Bluff
Homer, Neb.
Luton
Dakota City , Neb.
Sloan
Winnebago, Neb.
Bronson
POPULATION
387
1,153
457
50*
1,057
799
675
193
DISTANCE
FROM SITE
(miles)
4
7
7
7
8
8
8
10
DIRECTION
FROM SITE
E
N
W
ENE
NNW
SE
SW
NE
                 *  1974 population estimate provided by Siouxland  Interstate Metropolitan
                   Planning Council (SIMPCO)
                                                          Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census
                                                                1970 Census of Population
                                                                Number of Inhabitants
                                                                PC ( I ) -AI7 IOWA, Table 6
        e
   envirosphere
      company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE  Co. -  NEAL UNIT  4
   POPULATION:  PLACES WITHIN  10  MILES
             OF PROPOSED  SITE
                         DATE:
              SCALE:

             III-119
EXHIBIT
III-I-l

-------
                                                                           100 MILES
PLACE
Sioux City, IOWA
Fremont, NEB.
Norfolk, NEB.
Yankton, S.D.
Omaha, NEB.
Council Bluffs, IOWA
Bellevue, NEB.
Columbus, NEB.
Spencer, IOWA
Sioux Foils, S.D.
DISTANCE
FROM SITE
(miles)
14
60
60
65
75
75
80
80
85
90
DIRECTION
FROM SITE
N
S
wsw
NW
SSE
SSE
SSE
SW
NE
NNW '
1970
POPULATION
85,925
22,962
16,607
11,919
347,328
60,348
19,449
15,471
10,278
72,488
I960
POPULATION
89,159
19,698
13,640
9,279
301,598
55,641
8,831
12,476
8,864
65,466
% CHANGE
-3.6
16.6
21.8
28.5
15.2
8.5
120.2
24.0
16.0
10.7
                                                       SOURCE:  U.S.Bureau of the Census
                                                               1970 Census of  Population
                                                               Number  of Inhabitants
                                                               U.S. Summary, PC(I )-AI,Table 31
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                         IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT  4
CENTERS OF OVER 10,000 POPULATION
 WITHIN 100 MILES OF PROPOSED SITE
                        DATE:
           SCALE:
          III-120
EXHIBIT
III-I-2

-------
are located within a 100 mile radius of the proposed site.  Sioux
City  is of most significance to the proposed site because of its
high population (85,925 in 1970) and close proximity (14  miles).
Sioux City, however, was the only listed city to experience a net
loss  of  inhabitants  (36  percent)  from  1960 to 1970.  Omaha,
Nebraska, 75 miles south-southeast of the proposed site,  is  the
largest  city  in the region.  Over the same ten year period, its
population increased 15.2 percent, to 347,328.

    The 1974 population estimates for counties within 10 miles of
the proposed site  are  presented  in  Table  I1CI-I-3.    Woodbury
County,  with  an estimated 103,800 people, is more populous than
the other 3  counties  combined.   During  the  1960's,  Woodbury
Countyfs  population  declined  by  4.4 percent as shown in Table
III-I-2.  A decline was registered in both urban and rural  areas
although  the  percentage  drop  was  considerably greater in the
rural sector.

    The proposed site is  located  within  Liberty  and  Lakeport
townships   which   had  a  1970  population  of  1022  and  210,
respectively (shown in Table III-1-4).  Liberty is among the more
heavily settled townships in Woodbury County.  While  the  County
experienced  a 4.4 percent decline in population between the last
two decennial federal censuses. Liberty  township  was  the  most
stable  among the twenty-four Woodbury County subdivisions with a
decline of only 1 percent.

    The components  of  population  change  of  a  community  are
births,  deaths  and migration.  Migration, the least amenable to
measurement  and  especially  to  forecasting,  plays  the   most
important  role  in  population  fluctuations.  The components of
population change in Woodbury County from 1960 to 1970 are  given
in  Table III-I-5.  During that decade, Woodbury county had a net
loss of 4797 persons, equivalent to a  decline  of  4.4  percent.
This  compares to the state increase of 2.4 percent.  The natural
increase, which is defined as the excess of births  over  deaths,
for  the county was 10,463 persons or 9.7 percent while the state
experienced a natural increase of 9.1 percent.  Due  to  a  heavy
out-migration from the county  (14.1 percent, or almost 1 out of 7
residents),  the  net  change was a loss of 4.4 percent.  The net
change in the state's population was an increase of  2.4  percent
because  net  migration  was not significant enough to negate the
gain in population due to natural increase.

    As indicated in Table III-I-6, the  median  age  in  Woodbury
County in 1970 was 28.8 years; 12.5 percent of the population was
65  years  of age or over.  These statistics are similar to those
of the Sioux City urbanized area, the State of Iowa and the State
of Nebraska, as well as to  the  two  Nebraska  counties  in  the
immediate vicinity of the proposed site.  Monona County, however,
had  a  considerably  older  population with a median age of 36.9
years, and 16.9 percent of the population  65  years  of  age  or
over.
                                 III-121

-------
Minor tivil Division
Arlington township
Banner township
Concord township
Floyd township
Grange township
Grant township
Kedron township
Lakeport township
LIBERTY TOWNSHIP
Listen township
Little Sioux township
Miller township
Morgan township
Moville township
Oto township
Rock township
Rutland township
Sioux City city
Sloan township
Union township
West Fork township
Willow township
Wolf Creek township
Woodbury township
Woodbury County
1970
1,639
818
828
722
302
372
1,180
210
1,022
895
661
251
330
336
541
754
858
85,925
1,086
886
427
600
353
2,056
103,052
1960
1,602
788
657
778
343
426
1,082
277
1,032
961
804
491
421
441
644
1,020
923
89,159
1,056
948
545
730
487
2,234
107,849
Percent
Change
+2.3
+3.8
+26.0
-7.2
-12.0
-12.7
+9.1
-24.2
-1.0
-6.9
-17.8
^8.9
-21.6
-23.8
-16.0
-26.1
- 7.0
- 3.6
+2.8
- 6-5
-21.7
-17.8
-27.5
-8.8
-4.4
Source:   U S Bureau of the Census
         1970 Census of Population
         Number of Inhabitants
         PC(1) -A 17 Iowa, Table 10
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
POPULATION OF WOODBURY COUNTY
SUBDIVISIONS, 1960 AND 1970
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
111-1-4
                             111-122

-------

1960 Population
Natural Increase
(Birthsj
(Deaths)
Net Migration
Net Change
1970 Population
Woodbury County
Number
107,849
10,463
(21,689)
(11,226)
-15,260
- 4,797
103,052
Percent Change

+9.7

-
•-14.1
-4.4

Iowa
Number
2,757.537
251,431
(541,097)
(290,666)
-183,592
+66,839
2,824,376
Percent Change

+9.1


^6.7
+2.4

     Source:  U S Bureau  of the  Census
            1970 Census of Population
            Components  of Population Change of County, 1960-1970
            P25 #461
       O
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBA5CO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
  COMPONENTS OF  POPULATION CHANGE
    IN WOODBURY COUNTY 1960 TO 1970
                       DATE:
            SCALE:
           III-123
TABLE
UI-I-5

-------
County
Woodbury
Dakota (Neb)
Thurston (Neb)
Monona




Sioux City Urbanized
Area
STATE OF IOWA
STATE OF NEBRASKA



Population
103,052
13,137
6.935
12,069
95,937
2.8 1 4,. J, 76
1,483,493
Age Characteristics


Median
Age
28.8
26.0
27.4
36.9
28.2
28.8
28.6


Percent
Under
18 Yrs
34.6
38.7
38.9
32.3
34.5
34.5
34.2


Percent
65 Yrs &
Over
12.5
' 10.1
12.4
16.9
12.3
12.4
12.4


Percent
Rural
15.5
39.7
100.0
72.8
-
42.8
38.5
Native
Pop. -
Percent
Residing
In State
of Birth
70.0
50.4
83.2
82.1
65.8
78.7
72.3
Persons 25
Yrs & Over -
Median
School Years
Completed
12.3
12.1
11.2
12.1
12.2
12.2
12.2
Households



Number
32,854
3,910
2,036
4.134
30,657
896,295
473,902


Persons
Per
Household
3.04
3.30
3.34
2.87
3.03
3.05
3.02
Source: U S Bureau of the Census u $ fiureau of the Census
1970 Census of Population 19?n Census of Popu]ation
General Populat.on Characteristics General Social and Economic Characteristics
PC(1)-B17 Iowa, Tables 16, 24 and PC(1)-C17 Iowa, Tables 82, 83 and
PC(1)-B29 Nebraska, Tables 20, 22, 35 and 36 PC(l)-C29 Nebraska, Table 43
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4

SELECTED DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS, TABLE
1970: (COUNTIES WITHIN 10 MILES OF III-I-6
THE NEAL SITE)
DATE: SCALE:

-------
    3.   Population Projections

    County population projections for  5-year  intervals  through
1990 were made available by the Iowa State Office of Planning and
Programming  and  the  University  of Nebraska Bureau of Business
Research and are listed  in  Table  III-I-3.   Woodbury  County's
population is expected to increase over the 15-year period ending
in  1990.   The  population  of  Monona  County  is  projected to
increase at a slower rate, while Thurston County's population  is
anticipated  to  remain  relatively  stable.   The  population of
Dakota County is also expected to increase.
                                 III-125

-------
J.  SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS

    The  discussion  of  social  and   economic   characteristics
includes  an  analysis  of  educational  attainment,  residential
moves, housing characteristics, incomes, and  commutation.    Most
of  the information used in this study was obtained from the U.S.
Bureau of the Census, the Iowa  Employment  Security  Commission,
and the Iowa Crop Reporting Service.  Areas examined are Woodbury
and  Dakota  Counties   (which  comprise  the  Sioux City Standard
Metropolitan Statistical Area); the two other counties within  10
miles of the site; and the Sioux City urbanized area.

    1.   Education

    The level of education is an indicator of the  socio-economic
status  of  a  community.   A  summary  of educational levels for
Woodbury County is shown in Table III-J-1.  In 1970,  persons  25
years  of age and over residing in Woodbury County had achieved a
relatively high level of educational  attainment  with  a  median
number of 12.3 school years completed.  This may be compared with
12.2  years  for  the median for the state and 12.1 years for the
nation.  In 1960 the median for both the  county  and  state  was
11.3  years  of school completed.  Both the county and the state,
therefore,  experienced  substantial  gains  in  the   level   of
educational    attainment    during   the   intervening   decade.
Contributing heavily to this increase was the  larger  number  of
residents  attending  college  during  the  1960*s  and  reaching
adulthood by the 1970 census.  High  school  graduates  accounted
for 59.3 percent of the county1s adult population in 1970.

    An opposite indicator of educational attainment is functional
illiteracy.   Functional  illiteracy is measured as the number of
persons, 25 years old and over, who have completed  less  than  5
years  of  school.   In  1970,  2.6  percent of Woodbury County*s
population was in this  category.  This is higher than the state's
figure of 1.9 percent,  but substantially below the national total
of 5.5 percent.

    Among the counties within 10  miles  of  the  proposed  site,
Woodbury had the highest median number of school years completed,
as  shown  in  Table III-I-6 in the previous section.  The median
for Thurston County, Nebraska was considerably  lower  with  11.2
years  completed  while those  for  Dakota  County, Nebraska and
Monona County were both 12.1 years.

    2.   Residential Moves

    The native population, as measured by the percent of the 1970
population residing in  their state  of birth, was 70  percent  for
residents  of  Woodbury County, as  shown in Table III-1-6.  Table
III-J-2 presents  information  regarding  residential  moves  for
residents  of  counties within 10 miles of the proposed site.  Of
the Woodbury County residents in  1970,  almost  40  percent  had
moved  since  1965;  among  those who changed residence, about 60
                                  III-126

-------
Total Persons,
25 Years old and over
No School Years
Completed
Elementary
1 to 4 Years
5 to 7 Years
8 Years
High School:
1 to 3 years
4 Years
College:
1 to 3 Years
4 Years or More
Median School
Years Completed
1970
Woodbury County
Number

55,908

555

877
3.011
8,399
9,894
20,932
6.733
5,507


Percent

100.0

1.0

1.6
5.4
15.0
17.7
37.4
12.0
9.9

12.3
Iowa
Percent

100.0

0.6
-
1.3
5.7
18.5
15.0
38.7
11.1
9.1

12.2
          Source:  U S Bureau of the Census
                  1970 Census of Population
                  General Social and Economic Characteristics
                  PC(1)-C17  Iowa,  Tables 46 and 120
       O
  envirosphere
    company
DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
 IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE  CO.  - NEAL UNIT 4
WOODBURY  COUNTY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
                        DATE:
            SCALE:
          III-127
 TABLE
III-J-1

-------


County
Woodbury
Dakota (Neb)
Thurston (Neb)
Monona
STATE OF IOWA
STATE OF NEBRASKA

Total
94,647
11,791
6,343
11,274
2,591,320
1,362,316
Same
Residence
53,610
6,545
4,541
7,206
1,479,159
734,027
Residence in 1965
Difference Residence in U S

Number
37,638
4,814
1,464
3,739
1,015,866
559,209
Percent
of Total
39.8
40.8
23.1
33.2
39.2
41,0
Same
County
23,265
2,352
786
1,954
580,843
295,308
Percent
of Total
24.6
19.9
12.4
17.3
22.4
21.7
Different
County
14,373
2,462
678
1,785
435,023
263,901
Source: U S Bureau of the Census
1970 Census of Population
General Social and Economic Characteristics
PC(1)-C17 Iowa, and
PC(1)-C29 Nebraska, Tables 45 and 119
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
RESIDENTIAL MOVES, 1965 TO 1970
(COUNTIES WITHIN 10 MILES OF
THE NEAL SITE)
DATE: SCALE:
Percent
of Total
'15.2
.20.9
10.7
15.8
16.8
19.4





TABLE
1 1 1 - J - 2

-------
percent had moved within the county.    These  figures  are  quite
similar  to  those  for  the State of Iowa as a whole.   Among the
four counties in  the  immediate  study  area,  Thurston  County,
Nebraska,   had an especially stationary population with only 23.1
percent having changed their residences since 1965.

    3.   Housing Characteristics

    Several 1970 housing characteristics of the four counties  in
the immediate site vicinity and the Sioux City urbanized area are
presented  in Table III-J-3.  More than 99 percent of all housing
units in these four counties  are  year-round  units.   Of  these
year-round  housing  units  in  Woodbury County, only 6.3 percent
lacked some or  all  plumbing  facilities  while  the  comparable
figure  for  the  state  was 7.5 percent and for Thurston county,
Nebraska,  it was 22.1 percent.  The median value  of  $ 12,900  of
owner  occupied  housing units in Woodbury County was higher than
that in the other three counties  and  also  exceeded  the  state
averages.    More  than  1500  housing units in Woodbury County in
1970 were vacant and available for sale or rent.

    For the Sioux City Urban Area, under conditions  of  moderate
growth,  forecasts  of  housing and land requirements through the
year  2000  have  been  prepared  by  the  Siouxland   Interstate
Metropolitan  Planning  Council  (SIMPCO).  As presented in Table
III-J-4, 2,537 acres in the area require development  to  support
11,870 new housing units, both single and multi-family types.

    U.   Economy

    According to the Iowa Crop Reporting Service located  in  Des
Moines,  Iowa,  livestock  in Woodbury County produced more total
cash receipts than did crops  in  1973.   Cattle  and  hogs  were
responsible   for  similar  cash  receipts  with  dairy  products
following.  Corn, soybeans and oats are the main crops.  Woodbury
County is characterized by the Iowa Crop Reporting Service  as  a
consistently good producing agricultural county.

    In  1970  there  were 39,179 employed persons 16 years of age
and over in Woodbury County.  The figures for Monona, Dakota, and
Thurston Counties were, respectively,  4251,  1889  persons,  and
2421  persons.   Information  regarding employment by industry to
1970 is presented in Table III-J-5.   Due  to  the  influence  of
Sioux  City on the character of Woodbury County, the retail trade
employed  19.6  percent  of  those  working,  and   manufacturing
accounted for 17.4 percent.  Agriculture, forestry, and fisheries
together  accounted  for  4.7 percent or 1842 persons.  In Dakota
County, Nebraska manufacturing and the retail trade also employed
the highest percentages of workers, with 23.2  percent  and  19.5
percent,  respectively.   Agriculture,  forestry,  and  fisheries
together accounted for 9.5 percent of those  employed  in  Dakota
County.   Monona  and Thurston Counties, Nebraska, both exhibited
markedly different industrial profiles from those of Woodbury and
Dakota Counties, Iowa.  In these counties, agriculture,  forestry
                                 III-129

-------






















County
Woodbury
Dakota (Neb)
Thurston (Neb)
Monona
Sioux City Urbanized
Area
STATE OF IOWA
STATE OF NEBRASKA




Total
Housing
Units
35,127
4,174
2,211
4,511
32,626

964,060
515,069
Year-Round Housing Units





Total
35,093
4,171
2,207
4,478
32,614

954,801
511,891

Percent
Lacking
Some or
All Plumbing
Facilities
6.3
7.4
22.1
4.5
5.4

7.5
6.1
Owner -Occup ied




Total
22,816
2,753
1,239
2,908
21,200

642,676
314,600


Median
Value
(dollars)
12,900
11,800
7,400
8,100
13,200

9,900
12,400
Renter -Occup ied

•-


Total
10,018
1,158
794
1,225
9,457

253,635
133,279
Percent
La.ki..g
Some or
All Plumbing
Facilities
11.4
8.4
28.2
11.3
11.6

9.6
7.6

Median
Contract
Rent
(dollars)
72
76
51
49
74

77
77

Vacant
for
Sale only
or
For Rent
1,572
152
67
110
1,547

28,070
17,672















Source: U S Bureau of the Census
1970 Census of Population
General Housing Characteristics
HC(1) -A17 Iowa and
HC(1 ) -A29 Nebraska. Tables 2, 3. 4 and 29
GIOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS, 1970
envirosphere (COUNTIES WITHIN 10 MILES OF TABLE
company THE NFAL S!TE^ "I-J-3
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED DATE- SCALE!

-------
New Housing Units
Year
Housing Type
Single Family
Low
Medium
High
Multi Family
Low
Medium
High
Totals
Lot Area

20,000
8,000
6,600
4,000
2,800
1,000

Gross Acres/
Housing Unit
.662
.293
.254
.153
.119
.062

1980

145
1,501
732
367
732
183
3,660
1990

302
2,650
1,590
1,514
1,135
379
7,570
2000

474
2,970
2,492
2,374
2,374
1,186
11,870
Additional Acres
to be Developed
1980

96
440
186
56
87
11
876
1990

200
776
404
232
135
23
1,770
2000

314
870
633
363
283
74
2,537
Source: Siouxland Interstate Metropolitan Planning Council (SIMPCO), Economic Report, 1972.
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION o1 rs/v-co 'ssvia.- KGJRPOKA-ID
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
MODERATE FORECAST OF GROSS NEW RESIDENTIAL HOUSING AND LAND REQUIREMENTS
SIOUX CITY URBAN AREA

DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
III-J-4

-------
       Industry

Agri
-------
and   fisheries  employed  a  plurality  of  the  working  force,
amounting to more than 28  percent.   In  Monona  County,  retail
trade  and education were the next largest industries (19 percent
and 8.9 percent, respectively)  while in  Thurston  County  retail
trade and manufacturing both accounted for 13.0 percent.

    Table   III-J-6   presents  forecasts,  under  conditions  of
moderate growth in the Sioux City urban area,  of  employment  by
industry groupings through the year 2000.

    In Woodbury County, taxable payrolls during the first quarter
of 1972 amounted to $51,077,000, which represented a 10.2 percent
increase over the previous year (Table III-J-7).  The larger role
of  agriculture  in  Monona and Thurston Counties is reflected in
the relatively  low  taxable  payrolls  in  these  two  counties.
Thurston  County did, however, experience a 20.3 percent increase
in taxable payrolls during 1972 (Table III-J-7).

    5.   Occupation Characteristics, Incomes, and Commutation

    The occupational groups of the employed labor forces in  each
of  the  four  counties  within 10 miles of the site are shown in
Table III-J-8.  Data in Table III-J-9 indicate  generally  higher
earnings  in  Woodbury  County  than  in the other three counties
studied.  Earnings  for  comparable  occupations  were  generally
lowest in the Thurston County, Nebraska, which is entirely within
the boundaries of the Omaha and Winnebago Indian Reservations.

    Per  capita  and family income in Woodbury County was typical
of the State of Iowa (Table  III-J-10)  while  levels  for  Monona
County  were  generally lower.  The per capita income in Woodbury
County was 32886 in 1969, and the median family income was  $9035
in  1970.   Among  the  25,863  families  in Woodbury County, 9.2
percent had  incomes  below  poverty  level  ($3,259),  while  16
percent  had  incomes of $15,000 or more.  Monona County's family
income was lower  than  Woodbury  County.   Thurston  County  had
significantly  lower  per  capita  and  family  income than other
counties in the study area.

    According to data supplied by the  Iowa  Employment  Security
Commission  (IESC),  the  January  1976  unemployment rate in the
Sioux City SMSA (comprising of Woodbury and Dakota Counties)  was
3.8   percent*,   or   less   than  half  the  national  average.
Unemployment has, in fact, decreased steadily over the past three
annual surveys.  U.S. Census Bureau statistics, arrived at  by  a
different  methodology,  show  higher  levels of unemployment for
this area.  However, these are  still  relatively  low  rates  of
unemployment  and can be ascribed to three characteristics of the
State of Iowa as a whole:

         *    Agriculture, a relatively non-volatile industry, is
              at the base of the state's economy.
* Not seasonally adjusted.  Local unemployment rates are currently
  undergoing a data revision process which will, in the case of
  Sioux City, cut the rate by about 0.5*.  (Iowa Unemployment
  Security Commission, telephone contact, March 31, 1976).

                                 III-133

-------
                Industry Grouping
                                             Year

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Agriculture
Construction
Meat Processing
Other Food Manufacturing
Other Manufacturing
Transportation, Communications
and Utilities
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
1980
38
2,078
5,422
1,448
6,623
3,502
3,565
8,618
1990
43
2,153
5,850
1,430
8,865
4,005
3,954
9,789
2000
47
2,275
6,402
1,661
11,323
4,616
4,436
11,332
           Trade Sub-Total (7 & 8)
        9  Finance, Insurance and Real
             Estate
       10  Education
       11  Medical Services
       12  Other Services
           Services Sub-Total (10, 11, 12)
           General Government
13
             TOTALS
(12,183)(13,743)(15,768)
  2,357    2,735   3,194

  2,137    2,511   2,957
  3,203    3,666   4,221
  4,604    5,453   6,472
 (9,944) (11,630) (13,650)
  2,052    2,309   2,630
 45,647   52,763  61,566
Source: Siouxland Interstate Metropolitan Planning Council (SIMPCO),
        Economic Report, 1972.
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. - NEAL UNIT 4
MODERATE FORECAST OF TOTAL
EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY GROUPINGS
SIOUX CITY URBAN AREA
DATE:
TABLE
III-J-6
                          III-134

-------











County
Woodbury
Dakota (Neb)
Thurston (Neb)
Monona
STATE OF IOWA
STATE OF NEBRASKA
1972
Number of
Employees,
Mid-March
Pay Period
32,533
4,281
1.076
1.382
683,626
379,781
Taxable
Payrolls,
Jan-Mar
(I 1000)
51,077
7,269
1,241
1,349
1,127,543
579,520
1971
Number of
Employees,
Mid-March
Pay Period
31,181
4,323
943
1,302
660,427
361,041
Taxable
Payrolls,
Jan-Mar
($1000)
46,355
6,954
1,031
1,254
1,010,141
511,269



Percent Change ,
Taxable Payrolls,
First Quarters
1971-1972
10.2
4.5
20.3
7.6
1
1.6
13.3







*Excludes government and railroad employees, self-employed persons, farm workers, and domestic service workers.
Source: U S Bureau of the Census
County Business Patterns, 1972
CBP-72-17 Iowa and
CBP- 72-29 Nebraska. Table 1F
(
envir
cor
A DIVISION OF E6AC
BIOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
EMPLOYMENT AND PAYROLL, FIRST
OSDhere QUARTER 1971 AND 1972:(COUNTIES WITHIN
npany 10 MILES OF THE NEAL SITE)
ro SERVICES INCORPORATE:; DATE- SCALE"




TABLE
III-J-7

-------
Occupation
Professional, Technical
Managers and
Administrators, Non-Farm
Sales
Clerical
Craftsmen, Foremen
Operatives, Non-Transport
Transport Equipment
Operatives
Laborers, Non-Farm
Farmers, Farm Managers
Farm Laborers,
Farm Foremen
Service
Private Household
Total
Woodbury County
Number
4,983

4,281
3,376
6,429
4,900
3,959

1.637
1,898
1,318

386
5,545
467
39,179
Percent
of
Total
12.7

10.9
8.6
16.4
12.5
10.1

4.2
4.8
3-4

1.0
14.2
1.2
100,0
Dakota County
Number
395

438
358
579
738
680

278
231
363

80
655
94
4,889
Percent
of
Total
8.1

9.0
7.3
11.8
15.1
13.9

5.7
4.7
7.4

1.6
13.4
1.9
99.9
Thurston County
Number
257

175
80
273
166
192

92
173
505

161
294
53
2,421
Percent
of
Total
10.6

7.2
3.3
11.3
6.9
7.9

3.8
7.1
20.9

6.7
12.1
2.2
100.0
Monona County
Number
418

400
254
446
451
225

174
200
952

' 226
411
94
4,251
Percent
of
Total
9.8

9.4 _
6.0
10.5 -
10.6
5.3

4.1
4.7
22.4

5.3
9.7
2.2
100.0
Source:   U.S. Bureau of the Census
         1970 Census of Population
         General Social and Economic Characteristics
         PC(1)-C17 Iowa and PC(1)-C29 Nebraska Table 122
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
EMPLOYED PERSONS 16 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER, BY OCCUPATION, 1970
(COUNTIES WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE NEAL SITE)
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
III-J-8

-------



Occupation
Professional. Managerial, an
Kindred Workers
Craftsmen, Foremen, and
Kindred Workers
Operatives, including
Transport
Laborers, except Farm
Farmers and Farm
Managers
Farm Laborers and
Foremen
Clerical and Kindred
Workers



d












Woodburv Co.
Median Earnings
Males

$10,282

7.633

6.615
4.313

6,153

3.492


Females





$3.152






3.552
Dakota Co. (Neb;
Median Earnings
Males

$9.547

7.492

6.880
6.364

5.741

2.893


Females





$3.366






3.284
Tliurston Co. (Neb;
Median Earnings
Males

$6,897

5,300

4,742
3,800

4,635

2.939


Female:,





$3,407






2,065

Monona Co.
Median Earnings
Males

$9,071




6.433


5,545
4,250


5.892


2,662




Females






-

—

-

$2,254
Source: U S Bureau of the Census
1970 Census of
Population

General Social and Economic Characteristics
PC"i;'-C17 Iowa
PC 1 ;-C29 Nebra
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF FBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
and
ska, Table 122
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
MEDIAN EARNINGS OF PERSONS IN EXPERIENCED CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE
FOR SELECTED OCCUPATION GROUPS, 1969: (COUNTIES WITHIN 10 MILES OF
THE NEA! SITE)
DATE: SCALE:


TABLE
III-J-9


-------












County
Woodbury
Dakota (Neb)
Thurston (Neb)
Monona




STATE OF IOWA
STATE OF NEBRASKA
Sources: U S Bureau of

Per Capita
Income
(dollars)
2,886
2,593
1,875
2,603
2,894
2,814
Families

Total
Number
25,863
3,273
1,672
3,273
713,490
372,430

Median Income
(dollars)
9,035
8,557
( 6,075
6,975
9,018
8,564
Percent
Less Than
Poverty Level
9.2
9.5
20.2
12.3
8.9
10.1
Percent
$15,000 or
More
16.1
11.3
5.4
12.4
16.2
14.9




Civilian Labor
Force — Percent





Unemployed
4.6
2.5
1.3
3.9
3.5
2.7
the Census











1 970 Census of Population
General Social
and Economic Characteristics

PC(1) -C17 Iowa and
PC(1) -C29 Nebraska, Tables 44, 68, and 124
U S Bureau of
the Census

1 970 Census of Population
General Population Characteristics
PC(1) -B17 Iowa and
PC(1) -B29 Nebraska, Table 22
e
envirosphere
company
A D VISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
PER CAPITA INCOME, 1969 AND FAMILY INCOME AND UNEMPLOYMENT 1970
(COUNTIES WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE NEAL SITE)
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
III-J-10


-------
         •    Much  of  the  industry  is  also   correspondingly
              stable, e.g., farm machinery manufacturing and food
              processing.

         •    The state is experiencing a net out-migration which
              tends to diminish unemployment.

    In 1970, among  workers  residing  in  Woodbury  County,  7.2
percent  worked  outside  that  county (Table III-J-11).  About 10
percent of Monona County's workers commuted outside the county to
their jobs.  Comparable figures for Thurston and Dakota Counties,
Nebraska were 12.0 percent and 40.4 percent.

    Future employment rates in the Sioux City  Urban  Area  under
moderate  growth conditions have been forcasted by SIMPCO and are
presented in Table III-J-12.  On  the  basis  of  these  data,  a
steady  increase  in  the  percent of population employed and the
labor force participation rate is expected through the year 2000.
                                 III-139

-------







County
Woodbury
Efckou (Neb)
Thurston (Neb)
Monona

All
Workers
38,590
4,857
2,481
4,201
Worked
In
County of
Residence
34,024
2,722
1,941
3,425
Worked
Outside
County of
Residence
2,621
1,843
264
394
Place of
Work
not
Reported
1,945
292
276
382
Percent of
Reported Total
Working Outside
of County
7.2
40.4
12
.0
10.3
Source: U S Bureau of the Census
1970 Census of Population
General Social and Economic Characteristics
PC(1)-C17 Iowa and
PC(1)-C29 Nebraska, Table 119
envi
CO
A DIVISION OF EB
OM PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - IMEAL UNIT 4
rosphere PLACE OF WORK, 1970: (COUNTIES WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE NEAL SITE)
mpany
ASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED DATE: SCALE!










TABLE
III-J-11

-------
                                                                    1980
                                       Year
                                       1990
 2000
M

I—'
-P-
Employment  (FTE)
Percent  of  Population Employed
Total Population
                                                                    45,650
                                                                      39.0
                                                                   117,000
                                       52,760
                                        41.0
                                      128,700
 59,480
   42.0
141,600
                                FTE - Full Time Employment
                            Source: Siouxland Interstate Metropolitan Planning Council (SIMPCO),
                                   Economic  Report, 1972.
           O
       envirosphere
         company
IOWA  PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY -  NEAL UNIT 4
     MODERATE POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT FORECASTS,
                SIOUX CITY URBAN AREA
                          DATE:
                                       SCALE:
                        TABLE

                       III-J-12

-------

-------
                  IV - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF
                      THE PROPOSED PROJECT
A.  CONSTRUCTION

    1.   Impact on Local Socio-Economics

    The  development  of  the  proposed  Neal   Unit 4   is   not
anticipated  to  introduce  a  major  or abrupt alteration in the
socio-economic character of the area.  The overall effect of  the
proposed  action  on both a local and regional basis is projected
to be consistent with the area's existing character  as  well  as
recent trends and developments.

    From  an economic viewpoint, the proposed project will have a
generally beneficial, though not substantial, impact on the Sioux
City Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA); ie, the  area
consisting of Woodbury county, Iowa, and Dakota County, Nebraska.
These  benefits  include  the  creation  of  new  jobs during the
construction of the project, and  secondary  economic  activities
resulting from the project.

    To  evaluate  construction  impacts,  present  socio-economic
developments in  the  area  were  examined  and  related  to  the
experience  gained from construction activities which occurred in
the same general vicinity for the existing Neal Units 1,2 and 3.

         a.   Employment and Labor Force

    The primary effect of  construction  on  employment  and  the
labor  force  is  expected  to  occur  within the Sioux City SMSA
because the proposed project will be located only 14  miles  from
the  center  of  the  Sioux  City  urbanized  area.   The project
development would be in keeping with employment patterns for  the
area  since the construction industry has generally accounted for
more than 5 percent of the labor force.

    A number of  construction  workers  for  the  plant  will  be
available  because  of  two factors. First, because of the recent
completion of George Neal Unit 3 in December 1975,  a  number  of
the  workers  required for the construction of George Neal Unit 4
will already be in the area.  Construction of George Neal  Unit 3
required an average of 350 to 400 workers.  Second, based on 1970
U.S.  employment  statistics,*  a  total  of  5,727  construction
workers are available within an approximately ninety minute drive
of the site.

    The average unemployment  rate  between  1970  and  1976  for
construction  workers in the State of Iowa has been approximately
10 percent2.  This rate along with the knowledge that George Neal
Unit 3  has  just  been  completed  indicates  there  should   be
approximately  600  construction workers available in the area to
work on George Neal Unit 4.
                                 IV-1

-------
    Construction employment for the proposed project is scheduled
to extend over an approximately 3-1/2 year period.    Construction
began  in  March  1975,  and  trial  operation  is   scheduled for
September 1978.  The projected average construction work force on
the site is 700 workers and a maximum of 1,200 workers.

         b.   Housing and Relocation

    Based on the projected work force it will be necessary during
various phases of construction to employ relocated   workers.    It
is  estimated that anywhere from 100 to 700 workers will relocate
to the Sioux City area during various  periods  of   construction.
Assuming  an  average  family size to be 3.1 persons3, relocation
would result  in  a  maximum  increase  in  population  of  2,170
persons.   The  derived  population  increase  may  be higher than
would actually be experienced, since many relocated  construction
workers  should  be  staying  in  the area for a relatively short
period and are not expected to bring families.  Compared  to  the
population  of the Sioux City SMSA  (118,600 in 1974), this influx
will result in a maximum increase  of  1.8  percent.   Therefore,
construction  worker  immigration  should  have  little,  if any,
adverse impact on housing and social services in  the  area.    In
addition,  because  of  the higher levels of housing available in
the Sioux City SMSA than in adjacent rural counties,  no  adverse
impact or pressures are predicted for these counties.

         c.   Other Economic Factors

    Some important considerations include: the economic  benefits
resulting  from  construction activities; the subsequent economic
activity resulting from secondary or "multiplier11  effects;  and,
the  growth  in  the  local  tax  base, including those resulting
directly and those resulting indirectly from  increased  payrolls
and business activity.

    The  potential  taxes  resulting from the construction of the
proposed project will accrue to both state and local  government.
The beneficial impact of the proposed project is augmented by the
fact  that  construction  will  not cause a substantial temporary
loss in annual property tax  due  to  dislocation  of  houses  or
businesses.

    Neal  Unit 4 will have no effect on the economic costs to the
consumer during construction because the Iowa Commerce Commission
does not allow construction work in progress to become a part  of
the rate base.

    The  unit  has  a  projected  heat  rate  and  operating cost
equivalent to the Neal 3 unit.  The budgeted  installed  cost  of
the  unit is $276,000,000.  The increased burden to the consumers
of all the partners in the project based on today's  taxes,  cost
of  money,  depreciation  rate,  and  allowable rate of return on
investment amounts  to  $41,400,000  per  year.   This  would  be
realized   from  increased  consumption  by  existing  consumers.
                               IV-2

-------
increase in number of consumers, and individual  company  related
savings  due  to decreased operation of less efficient generating
units.

         d.   Community Facilities and Services

    The construction of the proposed project is expected to  have
an  impact on community facilities and services.  The majority of
construction employees are expected to  commute  to  the  project
site  from  the  nearby  Sioux  City  area.  Interstate 29, which
extends south from Sioux City,  is  located  approximately  2-1/2
miles  east  of  the proposed site.  A secondary access road runs
from Interstate 29 to the site vicinity.

    The  traffic  resulting  from  construction  activities  will
generally  be  of  two types: construction employees commuting to
and  from  work,  and  road  usage  by  construction  trucks  and
equipment,  which  will  be on an intermittent basis.  To a large
extent trucks and equipment will be limited to the  project  site
while  commuting  traffic  will be on regional routes and project
access roads.

    During the workday when construction workers are at the site,
support facilities and services required from  local  communities
are  anticipated to be minimal.  Based on past experience at Neal
Units 1, 2 and 3, normal community  services,  including  police,
fire,  health  facilities,  and  similar  public  and semi-public
activities should not be significantly affected.

    Due to the sparsity of workers that are  expected  to  reside
near  the  site,  the  effects  on local school enrollment by the
proposed project is estimated to be small.   Waste  disposal  and
operation   of   sanitary  facilities  will  be  accomplished  in
accordance with applicable federal, state, and local standards.

    2.    Impact on Land Use and Aesthetics

    Environmental  disturbances   resulting   from   construction
include:   the   disruption   of   local   transportation  during
construction; displacement of land from agricultural  production,
excavation  and  stockpiling  requirements;  and reduction of the
scenic value in the area.

    The site is located at the southern end of  several  existing
industrial  developments  in  a  region  generally  surrounded by
agricultural lands.  According to current zoning practices,  with
the  presence  of  the  Port  Neal  Industrial  District  and the
existing Neal Station to the north, the addition of  Neal  Unit 4
will  not  conflict  with  present  land  use  patterns or recent
development trends.

    Since the site is just south  of  the  existing  power  plant
complex,    additional   facilities   for   vehicles   and   rail
transportation are necessary.  Existing roads are sufficient  for
                                IV-3

-------
construction  access to the site.   About 1-1/2 miles of rail spur
have been constructed.   Due  to  the  generally  low  population
density in the vicinity of the proposed project, and the presence
of the Port Neal Industrial District, the effects of noise,  dust,
and  smoke  disturbances  from  construction  and  transportation
vehicles should not be significant.

    Construction of the proposed project has displaced an area of
land most of which was in agricultural production.  The 415  acres
of cropland on the site constituted less than 0.1 percent of  the
total agricultural land in Woodbury County.

    The  construction of the proposed project will have no direct
or indirect effect on properties listed in the National  Register
of   Historic   Places  and  the  National  Register  of  Natural
Landmarks.  No known historic or  archaeological  sites  will  be
affected  by  the  project.   The  seven  sites  of historical or
archeological interest in the Dakota-Woodbury County  region  are
each  a  minimum  of 7 miles away from the proposed location, and
there are no reported historic or  archaeological  sites  in  the
immediate vicinity of the proposed project.

    The  greatest  impact  on existing land use and features will
occur during construction.  During construction operations,  areas
will  be  excavated,  earth  will  be  stockpiled,   construction
materials   stored,   and   protective  fencing  erected.   These
construction activities will initiate  a  temporary  impact  both
physical  and  visual  on the site area.  To mitigate the adverse
visual and other negative environmental  consequences  associated
with construction, a program of specific practices and safeguards
will  be adopted by the construction contractor.  These practices
include:

         •    Soil and water conservation  procedures,  including
              the  retention and protection of natural vegetation
              wherever possible and the removal  and  appropriate
              treatment of top soil during construction.

         •    Development of appropriate temporary  ground  cover
              and the reduction of soil erosion by minimizing the
              duration of soil exposure.

         •    Dust  control  procedures,  including   the   water
              sprinkling  of  roads and construction areas,  where
              appropriate.

         •    Appropriate management,  removal  and  disposal  of
              construction debris and unsightly materials.

         •    Compliance with state and local safety  and  health
              regulations, including statutory and administrative
              regulations  which  are  applicable  to the project
              activities.
                                 IV-4

-------
         •    Permanent landscaping and planting  of  appropriate
              vegetation   consistent  with  the  precepts  of  a
              program   for   landscaping    and    horticultural
              practices.

    3.   Impact on Water

    High infiltration rates occur at the plant site (as noted  in
Table  III-A-1  the maximum infiltration rate ranges from 2 to 20
inches/hour) .  Therefore, since these rates are  greater  than  5
inches/24 hours (equal to the 10 year-24-hour rainfall event), it
is  estimated  that  no  runoff  will  result due to construction
activities.

    Construction practices, moreover, are planned to minimize and
inhibit soil erosion.  These practices are:

         •    Minimizing cleared areas

         •    Avoiding steep slopes during grading operations

         •    Establishing plant cover  as  rapidly  as  possible
              after grading

    Specific  practices to be followed during construction of the
intake and discharge structures are as follows:

         •    Excess concrete from the construction of the intake
              and  discharge  structures  and  the  cleaning   of
              concrete truck's chutes will not be discharged into
              the river.

         •    All  areas  disturbed   along   the   bank   during
              construction   will   be   protected  against  soil
              erosion.

         •    Measures will be employed to  prevent  spillage  of
              oils,  fuels, or other types of hazardous materials
              and to keep these materials from entering the river
              during or after construction.

         •    In order to protect water quality and aquatic life,
              all construction activities will be accomplished in
              a manner to minimize turbidity.

         •    Debris will not be left  on  shore  after  cleaning
              operations   to  prevent  the  possibility  of  its
              entering the waterway.

         •    The excavated material not used for  backfill  will
              not be placed in the river or in a wetland area.
                                  IV-5

-------
    4.   Impact on Land

         a.   Effects on Biological Communities of Site Area

              i. Removal of Vegetation

    Tne areas of natural vegetation which have been  cleared  for
plant  construction  are  shown  in  Exhibit IV-A-1.   These areas
consist of 4 acres of riparian  shrub,  24  acres  of  sand  dune
border,  and 6 acres of cottonwood forest.  The remaining area to
be cleared consists of approximately 415 acres of cropland.

    The direct effects of construction will result in the loss of
animals having restricted ranges or  those  which  are  sedentary
(e.g.,   amphibians,  reptiles,  some  small  mammals,  and  most
invertebrates).   These  animals  will  probably  be   eliminated
because of clearing, excavating, grading and filling operations.

    Larger  mammals  such as deer and coyotes and most birds will
emigrate to  adjacent  undisturbed  habitats.   The  animals  not
suffering  mortality  from predation during migration may utilize
temporary habitats.  However, since most habitats are at  maximum
carrying  capacity  prior  to migration, the populations of these
animals will  decrease  and  revert  back  to  the  pre-migration
population size after winter kills and predation.  Therefore, the
number of larger mammals and birds will be reduced as a result of
construction.

    Removal of riparian shrub, including wetlands, will eliminate
the  habitats of: deer dependent upon the cottonwood thickets for
shelter and winter browse: pheasants which roost in the  thickets
and  feed  in  the dry grassy areas: and, waterfowl which feed on
the emergent aquatic plants of  the  partially  inundated  zones.
The  removal  of  cottonwood  trees bordering a section of stream
located within the site will represent  a  loss  of  habitat  for
deer,  rabbits,  pheasants  and squirrels and therefore a loss in
population numbers.

    The direct impact of construction on wildlife will be  severe
but  highly  localized.   Because  of  the  small area of natural
vegetation found on the proposed site, reductions in densities of
game species and other wildlife resulting from vegetation removal
are expected to be small.

    Discontinuation of agricultural practices  on  the  remaining
415  acres  of  the  proposed  site  will  reduce food supply for
wildlife on the site and  surrounding  region.   The  Iowa  State
Conservation  Commission  owns  a  large  refuge  and  state game
management area south of the site   (see  Exhibit  III-G-1)  which
includes cropland and many cover types.5

    Iowa  Public  Service,  in  conjunction  with  the Iowa State
Conservation Commission, has planted some vegetation for food and
cover  for  wildlife  at  the  site  with  a  shelterbelt.    The
                                IV-6

-------
                                                                    Rl PARI A N
                                                                    SHRUB
                                                    NEAL UNIT 4
                                                         SITE
   envirosphere
     company
* DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                       IOWA  PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
NATURAL  VEGETATION OF
   NEAL  UNIT 4 SITE
                     DATE:
     SCALE:
EXHIBIT
IV-A-1
                                       IV-7

-------
shelterbelt has been planted along the perimeter of the site.   It
covers  approximately  33  acres  and  is  about 110 feet wide by
12,900 feet long.  The belt consists of russian olive,   ponderosa
pine,  red  cedar,  honey suckle,  redosier, dogwood, native plum,
soft maple and cottonwood.  It will provide food, nesting  sites,
and protective cover for many kinds of wildlife.*

              ii. Construction Activities

    The   increased   presence   of  humans  and  the  activities
associated with plant construction may inhibit  certain  wildlife
species  from utilizing habitat adjacent to the site, such as the
Browns Lake and Snyder Bend areas which are between one-half  and
three  miles from the site.  Construction noise may cause many of
the more mobile species of wildlife to emigrate temporarily  from
areas  adjacent  to  the  noise sources.  This avoidance behavior
could restrict their access to food or  shelter  and,  therefore,
adversely  affect  their  survival.7  Breeding  and  feeding near
construction areas is also expected to  be  less  than  in  areas
outside  of  hearing distance of the construction noise.  Animals
relying on auditory signals for courtship  and  mating,  and  for
detecting prey and predators, will be affected by increased noise
levels  if  they  remain near the noise source.  Some animals may
adapt to noise produced during  the  construction  phase  of  the
project   and   utilize  areas  adjacent  to  construction  noise
sources.8

    It has been observed that  sparrows,  blackbirds,  and  quail
utilize  open  field habitat adjacent to power plant construction
sites but flush when earth movers, bulldozers, or personnel  come
within  the  species flushing distance.  Construction traffic can
be expected to result in an unquantifiable increase in road kills
of mammals, amphibians, and reptiles.

         b.   Effects on Regional Terrestrial Ecosystem

    The assessment of plant construction impacts on the  regional
terrestrial  ecosystem must consider the uniqueness of removed or
disrupted vegetation types, the  segmentation  or  separation  of
natural terrestrial areas, and the interference with particularly
productive  communities.   The  four vegetation types affected by
site preparation activities  are:  sand  dunes;  riparian  shrub;
cottonwood forest; and cropland.  Because the latter three types,
as  depicted in Exhibit III-F-1, are common, the loss of riparian
shrub,  cottonwood  forest,  and  cropland  is  not   likely   to
significantly  alter  the  diversity  of  vegetation and wildlife
habitat types in the regional ecosystem.

    Most of the plant communities of the type found on  the  site
are   not  unique  to  the  region.  However,  the  sand  dune areas
represent a relatively unique terrestrial  community.   The  area
destroyed   by   site  construction,  however,  is   small  and  is
primarily a transition between sand dune and shrub woods.
                                IV-8

-------
    The effect of plant construction on regional productivity  is
unquantifiable.  As  described  above,  parts  of  the productive
riparian shrub zone of Snyder Bend may experience a  decrease  in
wildlife utilization as a result of the area's close proximity to
Neal Unit 4.  Behaviorally wary species which rely to some extent
on  vegetative  cover  along  the  river's  shore,  such as deer,
beaver, and mink, may  be  affected  by  plant  construction  and
operation.    There is some evidence that wintering bald eagles in
the Snyder Bend area avoid  present  construction  activities  by
flying along the western side of the Missouri River when foraging
past the site.9

    While the area of habitat affected by Neal Unit 4 is small in
comparison with the total amount of these habitats which exist in
the  region  surrounding  the site, the loss of approximately 450
acres of vegetation and  wildlife  habitat  for  industrial  use,
nevertheless,  represents a small but negative incremental impact
on the  terrestrial  ecosystem  of  the  Missouri  River  valley.
Construction  of Neal Unit 4 in the Port Neal Industrial District
extends into agricultural and  natural  terrestrial  communities.
This  industrial district, with the addition of Neal Unit 4, will
border a large block of relatively  undisturbed  habitat  on  the
east  side  of  the  Snyder-Winnebago  Bends.   This  block  will
therefore not be divided into smaller segments.

         c.   Effects on Soils

    Conversion of agricultural land to impervious  buildings  and
pavements  causes  an increase in runoff because precipitation is
prevented from soaking  into  the  soil.  In  addition,  soil  is
compacted  by  the  passage  of  vehicles  and  cannot infiltrate
precipitation as rapidly as undisturbed soil.  In both situations
the impact effect is a greater amount of runoff in a shorter time
than would occur on the undisturbed soil.  For the proposed site,
however, this impact should not be great for  two  main  reasons.
First,  the  terrain is relatively flat which is not conducive to
rapid runoff.  Second, soils are  mostly  permeable  which  would
allow  for  drainage  into  the soil if it has been scarified and
vegetated after construction.

    If the proposed site is cleared at the latest  possible  time
and  some  portions  are  revegetated  as  soon as possible after
construction, sedimentation and erosion should  be  mimimal  even
though credible soils are present.

    5.   Impact On Aquatic Ecology

    Several  effects  of  power  plant  construction  on  aquatic
systems  can  occur.   These  can  be  fitted  into  the  general
categories of habitat modification and habitat loss.  In the case
of George Neal Unit 4, no aquatic  habitat  will  be  lost  as  a
result of construction.
                               IV-9

-------
    Habitat   modifications  result  primarily  from  changes  in
chemical water characteristics.   Of  these,  increases  in  total
suspended  solids  (TSS)  due to site dewatering, runoff,  and in-
water construction of the intake and discharge structure  usually
has   the   greatest   potential   for   impact.   However,    TSS
concentrations in the Missouri River were greater  than  50   mg/1
(Table  III-C-3)   in  every  month  except  December,  January and
March.  Assuming all discharges and runoff are treated to  reduce
TSS  to  50  mg/1  as  required by federal regulations, no impact
should result except possibly during the winter months.

    McKee and Wolf*°, report that fish generally tolerate TSS  at
concentrations  of  20,000  mg/1  and  higher.  However,  several
centrarchid species are sensitive  to  concentrations  of  75-100
mg/1  during  spawning  periods.  Because treated discharges from
the construction area will contain lower concentrations  of   TSS;
spawning of sensitive species in the Missouri River occurs during
late  spring;  and  centrachids  will  not  spawn directly in the
Missouri River, but in quiet  backwaters  or  flooded  areas;  no
impact  due  to  raised  TSS  levels  during the winter months is
expected.

    Higher TSS levels in the Missouri River due to  the  in-water
construction  of  the  intake  and discharge structure will occur
only at the time of cofferdam placement  and  removal.   Although
TSS  levels  at  these  times  could  exceed  critical values for
spawning of some centrachids, the increased levels will occur for
only brief periods of time and are not  expected  to  persist  in
backwater areas where spawning occurs.

    Other  potential  changes  in  chemical water characteristics
could result from spillage of  corrosion  inhibitors,   oil,   etc.
Care will be exercised in the storage and use of these materials,
and any spillage is immediately reported and properly dealt with.

    One  small backwater located immediately behind the Iowa rip-
rap. Site A in Exhibit III-C-12 may be disturbed by construction.
This backwater is a potential source of recruitment for  Missouri
River  fish populations given a free connection with the river in
summer and fall. However, it often  serves  as  a  sink,  wherein
spawned  individuals  are lost due to receding water levels, high
temperatures and low oxygen concentrations.

    6.   Air Quality

    During  construction,  care  will  be   taken   to   minimize
significant  adverse  effects  on  air quality.  The project will
comply with the provisions of  the  Iowa  Air  Pollution  Control
Commission  "Rules  and  Regulations  Relating  to  Air Pollution
Control" which are applicable during construction activities.

    All construction waste material will be disposed of either by
hauling to landfill sites, or  by  on-site  burning  as  provided
under  the Iowa State Regulations.  Waste from landscape clearing
                                IV-10

-------
may  be  burned  as  permitted  under  the  State  of  Iowa   Air
commission's  Rules and Regulations Subsection Number 4.2 (455B),
Openburning, with the following restrictions:  "However,  burning
of   landscape   waste   produced   in  clearing,  grubbing,  and
construction operations shall be  limited  to  areas  located  at
least  one-fourth mile from any inhabited building.  Rubber tires
shall not be used to ignite landscape waste."

    Construction  techniques  at  Neal  Unit 4  will  follow  the
guidelines set forth in Subsection Number 4.3(2)c, Fugitive Dust,
of the State of Iowa Air Pollution Control Commission's Rules and
Regulations.  During dry periods all access roads will be watered
or  treated  with  calcium chloride to suppress fugitive dust. In
addition, all cleared storage  areas  which  may  create  a  dust
problem will be paved or rocklined.

    The effects of airborne fugitive dusts will be minimal due to
the  above  outlined  steps  and  the location of the plant in an
industrial park area away from residential areas.

    Construction equipment and practices will  be  in  compliance
with  Iowa  Department  of  Environmental  Quality,  Air  Quality
Commission  Rules  and  Regulations  Relating  to  Air  Pollution
Control,   Sections   4.3(d) (2)   Gasoline-powered  vehicles  and
4.3(d) (3)  Diesel-powered  vehicles.    Gasoline   vehicles   are
prohibited  from  emitting visible emissions for longer than five
seconds.  Diesels are prohibited from emitting smoke equal to  or
darker than 40 percent opacity for longer than five seconds.

    It  is  anticipated  that  most construction workers will use
Interstate 29 for travel  to  and  from  the  plant  site.   This
traffic   can   be   expected   to   result  in  an  increase  in
concentrations of hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, nitrogen  oxide,
photochemical  oxidants and particulate matter in the vicinity of
the highway.
                                IV-11

-------
B.  CIRCULATING WATER SYSTEM

    1.    Intake System

    The cooling water for Neal Unit 4 will be  withdrawn  from  a
reinforced  concrete intake structure located on the east bank of
the  Missouri  River.   During  normal  plant  operation,   about
317,400 gpm (707 cfs) of cooling water will be passed through the
condenser  and then discharged directly back to the river through
a seal well located downstream from the intake  structure.    This
comprises  approximately  2  to  5 percent of the monthly average
river flow that passes the site.  Combined  with  condenser  flow
through  Neal Units 1-3, this could represent a total circulating
water system passage of about 11 percent of  the  river  flow  in
December,  January,  February;  8 percent in March; and 5 percent
the rest of the year.  The velocity through the traveling screens
will be about 0.9 feet per second (fps) with an approach velocity
of about 0.4 fps at the design mean water elevation of 1055  feet
(river  flow  =  12,000 cfs).   At mean high water, (el 1067 feet
river flow = 50,000 cfs),  the  velocity  through  the  traveling
screens  will  be  about  0.7 fps  with  an  approach velocity of
0.3 fps.  A more detailed discussion  of  the  intake  system  is
found in Section II-B-2.

         a.   Effects on Aquatic Ecology

    Power plant intake operation can  effect  the  ecology  of  a
water  body by entraining and impinging aquatic organisms.   These
potential  impacts  are  treated  in  detail  in  the   following
sections.   The  bases  for  assessments  given  here  are  acute
temperature mortality data; time-temperature exposure data  where
available;  empirical  data  on  condenser passage mortalities at
other  steam  electric  stations;  life  history  and  behavioral
information; and actual operating data for Neal Units 1, 2, and 3
regarding  impingement  rates  and  mortalities,  and entrainment
rates.

              i.   Condenser Entrainment

    Entrainment is the  process  whereby  aquatic  organisms  are
carried  through  a  power  plant circulating water system.  Only
those organisms that are not filtered by  the  traveling  screens
(mesh size = .95 cm) are entrained.  Because organisms this small
are  relatively  non-motile  when compared to water velocities at
the intake, it is assumed individuals cannot  avoid  entrainment.
If  entrainment  is  non-selective  and  if  the  distribution of
organisms in the water body is homogeneous, the  relative  number
                              IV-12

-------
of  entrained  organisms  is  equal to the relative amount of the
river flow withdrawn.

    Homogeneity of organism distribution has been  experimentally
tested  at  Port  Neal.   Appendix  Table  A-IV-B-1  includes the
results of this study.  The river was  divided  at  two  stations
(Transects  1  and  6, Exhibit III-C-3)  into Iowa, mid-river, and
Nebraska sections.  Triplicate phytoplankton samples  were  taken
at random within each section, and counts of organisms present in
a single strip across each of three Sedgewick - Rafter cells were
made.     This   subsampling   experiment   is   illustrated   in
Exhibit IV-B-1.

    Distribution  and  abundance  of  green  algae  were   highly
variable.   This  could  have  been  due  to  current vectors and
velocities but  the  lack  of  diatom  variation  among  stations
suggests  that this is not the case.  Analysis of variance of the
results using transformed counts of total green  algae  indicated
that  significant  differences  occurred  even at the replicate -
within stratum level   (Table IV-B-1).   This  suggests  that  the
variability   could   be   due  to  inadequate  sample  size,  an
insufficient number of replicates, and/or some  other  aspect  of
the sampling design.

    By  dividing  the circulating water system flow rate for Neal
Unit 4 by Missouri River flow rates, it can be seen that  between
1 and 8 percent of the entrainable organisms present in the river
will   be  entrained   (see  Table IV-B-2) .   Under  average  flow
conditions between 2 ana 5  percent  of  the  organisms  will  be
entrained.   During  the  spring and summer months, when greatest
numbers  of  fish  eggs   and   fry,   zooplankton,   drift   and
phytoplankton were observed, only 1-2 percent of the flow will be
v/ithdrawn.

    While  passing  through a circulating water system, entrained
organisms are subjected to pressure changes, temperature changes,
changes in water chemistry and  mechanical  damage.   Effects  of
these  stresses  are  dependent  upon  the  type of organism, the
maximum stress encountered, and the duration of the stress.

    Phytgplankton

    The effects of entrainjnent  on  phytoplankton  appear  to  be
primarily  a  result of exposure to increased water temperature1.
Increased  temperatures   can   either   increase   or   decrease
productivity  depending  upon  the intitial water temperature and
the amount  of  temperature  increase1,2,3.   Most  algae  prefer
temperatures   between   20-25°C  although  a  few  prefer  lower
temperatures and many, especially the blue green species,  prefer
higher   temperature4,5,6.   Maximum  temperature  tolerances  of
greater than 30°C have been  reported  for  Nitzchia,  Chlorella^
Oscillatoria,  Lyngbya,  and  AnKistrodesmus?.  Although the test
species were not necessarily the  same  as  those  found  in  the
Missouri  River,  it  is  generally  reported  that  diatoms, the
                                 IV-13

-------
                   3 RANDOM  REPLICATE
                     PLANKTON SAMPLES
                           TRANSECT
                              6
   TRANSECT    NEBRASKA
                                                 COUNT 1
                                                 COUNT 2
                                                                  \SEDGEWICK
                                                                   X RAFTER
                                                                  1  \\\ COUNTING
                                                                      \\CHAMBER

                                                                  -,'  \ \
       e
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
 IOWA  PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT  4
    SCHEMATIC OF PLANKTON SUBSAMPLING
          EXPERIMENT,  MAY 30, 1974
DATE:
SCALE:
                                       IV-14
                                   EXHIBIT
                                   I V - B - 1

-------


Level
3 (Stations)1
2 (Strata: Stations)-

1 (Replicates: Strata)
0 (Slides: Replicates)
Sum
of
Squares
19.592
31.459

21.655
26.973
Degrees
of
Freedom
1
4

12
36

Mean
Squares
19.5915
7.0647

1.8046
0.7492


F Ratio
10.8564**
4.3582*
*
2.4085

*    Significant  at  the  .05  level of probability.




**   Significant  at  the  .01  level of probability.




1-Station  1  vs. Station 6 (Exhibit II1-C-3).




2-lowa, Mid-River,  Nebraska (Exhibit IV-B-1).
e
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF fBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE ON TRANSFORMED COUNTS
(/TH5) OF TOTAL GREEN ALGAE ENUMERATED IN
THE SPECIAL PLANKTON DIST. STUDY, MAY30, 1974

DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IV-B-1
                                              IV-15

-------







	 . 	
Month
Jan
Kch
Mar
Apr
Max


V1.i> iniuin
(low
(iipm s IO3)
10.350
27.000
18.810
34.380
23.040
Jim 31.410
Percent
ol Max How
Withdrawn
By Neal 4
3
1
:
1
1
1
Jnl 24.345 1

^IJS
Sept



Get
Nov
Dec
20.325 !
25,425 ; ''•
23.760
25.065
21,690
1
i
1

,WK,.',
6.975
7,200
10.350
15.300
15.300
16.200
16.650
18.000
17.325
15.300
15.750
7.425
Percent of
Average How
Withdrawn
By Neal 4



90 Percent
Low 1 km
(gpni \ 10-")
5 3.825
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4.050
4.500
12.510
1





3.050
3.050
3.612.5
4.085
4.085
3.612.5
12.150


o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
NEAL UNIT 4 DESIGN CWS FLOW (317,400 GPM) AS A
FUNCTION OF MONTHLY MISSOURI RIVER FLOWS
DURING THE PERIOD 1965-1972
DATE: SCALE:
4.500
Percent ul
Low How
Willulrawn
B\ Nea! 4
8
8
7
2.5
"
L.
2
'
2
2
3
7














TABLE
IV-B-2
IV-16

-------
dominant  phytoplankton   in   the   Missouri   River,   tolerate
temperatures near or slightly above 30°C8.

    On  the  basis  of  the  preceding,  it  appears  likely that
phytoplankton entrainment will  result  in  primary  productivity
increases  during  winter  months,  and  decreases  during summer
months. However, Morgan and Stress1 suggest  that  the  pressure,
chemical  and  mechanical  stresses of entrainment may lessen any
productivity stimulation.  Because no biocides will  be  used  in
Neal Unit 4, these additional negative effects may be negligible.

    In  any  case,  changes in phytoplankton productivity are not
likely to have any  significant  ecosystem  effects.   The  river
water  is  so  turbid  that  autochthonous  production  is likely
restricted to the limited aufwuchs community found on the shallow
portions of river control structures and other solid  substrates.
When  compared  to allochthonous sources of carbon, autochthonous
production  probably  contributes  little  to  the  total  carbon
budget.

    Zooplankton

    The zooplankton species subject to entrainment were described
in Section III-C-2.  Data obtained in summer, 1973, and in spring
and  summer,  1974  on  passage of organisms through the existing
Neal  Units 1  and  2  condensers  are   included   in   Appendix
Tables A-IV-B-2  and  3.  These data were collected by suspending
nets in the intake forebay of Neal 1 and 2 between the  traveling
screens  and  the  trash  racks  and  provide a good baseline for
evaluating Neal 4.  The discrepencies between  the  two  sets  of
data  arose from a smaller mesh net being used in 1974, resulting
in higher and more representative number of Daphnia than in 1973.

    Together, the studies convey a  realistic  picture  of  large
zooplankton entrainment at Neal Units 1 and 2.  Small zooplankton
species,  especially rotifers, immature cladocerans, and immature
copepods, were not effectively sampled by  the  large  mesh  nets
that were generally employed. However, large individuals are most
important  as  prey for fish9,1**, including freshwater drum11,12,
channel catfish fry13, gizzard shad1*, and bigmouth buffalo12.

    Mortality of zooplankton resulting from  entrainment  is  not
likely  to  have  a  significant ecosystem impact.  Hynes1s notes
that turbid rivers carry few  true  plankton  and  the  Cladocera
(other  than Bosminidae) are especially susceptible to silt.  The
large numbers of Daphnia found in the  Missouri  River  indicates
much  of  the  zooplankton  production  is occurring in backwater
areas and  upstream  reservoirs,  and  many  of  the  individuals
sampled  are  strays  from these areas.  As these individuals are
not contributing to the secondary productivity of the system  and
as  their biomass remains available to other trophic levels after
entrainment, few effects of these mortalities are expected.
                                 IV-17

-------
    Undoubtedly,  some  zooplankton,  especially  rotifers,   are
viable   producing  populations.   Rotifers,  however,  are  more
resistant to high temperatures  so  their  entrainment  mortality
should  be  low.   Because  members of this phyla also have rapid
regeneration times16 and because only  a  small  portion  of  the
standing crop will be entrained, little impact should result from
entrainment of viable members of this zooplankton community.

    The  smaller members of the drifting benthos are also subject
to entrainment.  Drift samples taken  as  part  of  the  baseline
survey  (see  Appendix  Table A-III-C-2) provide an indication of
the constant (ie, daytime) drift*7. Research*8 has shown that the
greatest numbers of drifting organisms occur at night, often in a
sharply peaked, bi-modal pattern.   Because  of  this  behavioral
drift the sampling data could underestimate numbers entrained.

    A  more  accurate estimate of entrained macroinvertebrates is
provided by operating data from  Units  1  and  2.   Sheet  2  of
Appendix   Table A-IV-B-2   presents  the  numbers  of  organisms
entrained over a  24 hour  period.   The  remainder  of  Appendix
Tables A-IV-B-2 and A-IV-B-3 presents data for macroinvertebrates
comparable   to   those   previously  described  for  zooplankton
entrained in 1973 and 1974.

    Although little work has been done on temperature  tolerances
of  larval  macroinvertebrates,  one  study19  indicated that the
median tolerance limit  (TLM) of mayflies, stoneflies, and  caddis
flies  was  in  the  range 20°C  (68°F) -30°C  (86°F).  Ephemerella
subvaria and Stenonema tripunctatunij both mayflies, had TLM«s  of
21.5°C (70.7°F) and 25.5°C  (77.9°F), respectively.  Brachycentrus
americanus,  a  caddis  fly  of the family Brachycentridae, had a
96 hr TLM of 29°C  (8U.2°F) Dipterans of the  family  Tendipedidae
(midges)   have  been  found  to  exhibit upper lethal temperature
tolerances of between 29°C  (84.2°F) and 35°C  (95°F)2o,21,22,  and
thus  may  be  less  affected  by  heat  than the other orders of
insects.  Mihursky and Kennedy22 cited data indicating that  some
genera  showed  upper limits as high as 37.8°C (100°F) and 39.4°C
(103°F).  Temperatures achieved inside the Neal Unit 4 condensers
will be in excess of 32.2°C  (90°F) in summer.

    Benthic macroinvertebrates are important to lotic  ecosystems
because  of  their  role  in processing organic material and as a
food item for fish15,18,23,2*,25.  In the Missouri River  in  the
vicinity  of the George Neal site, channelization has resulted in
a habitat generally unsuited to benthic invertebrate  production.
For  this  reason, the importance of benthic invertebrates to the
ecosystem in this region is suspect.  When compared to planktonic
invertebrates, the benthic populations  are  more  susceptible  to
damage  resulting  from low level continuous mortality because of
their much greater regeneration times.  However, in  the  case  of
entrainment,   only   that   portion  of  the  benthic  community
comprising the drift is  subject  to  this  mortality.   Waters23
reports  that  drift  invertebrates  usually  comprise  .01 to .5
percent  of  the  total  benthic  community   at   any  one   time.
                               IV-18

-------
Entraining  2  to  5  percent  of  these  should result in little
impact.

    Fish

    Effects of power plant entrainment on fish  eggs  and  larvae
were  reviewed  recently  by  Marcy26.  He noted that, while most
studies have dealt with the effects of  increasing  temperatures,
some  of  the  more  recent  work  has indicated that many of the
observed mortalities may be due to  mechanical  stress.   Marcy27
reported  that  80  percent of the mortality experienced by young
white perch, carp, white catfish, American eelr spottail  shiner,
and  johnny  darter,  could be attributed to mechanical abrasion.
Schubel28  found   that   time-temperature   exposure   histories
experienced by fish eggs of a number of estuarine species did not
preclude successful hatching.  Heat is responsible for some inner
plant  mortality,  however,  and  in fact coutant29 has developed
predictive equations for time-temperature moralities of a  number
of  young  fish,  including  gizzard  shad  and  channel catfish.
Davies and Jensen30 (In: Marcy26) indicated that rapid mixing  of
circulating  water  discharge  helps minimize heat mortality, but
due to the combination of effects it is probably not unreasonable
to assume 100 percent mortality of entrained fish eggs and larvae
at Neal 4.

    The majority of species  inhabiting  the  river  provided  no
parental  care  of  the eggs, and produced large numbers of eggs,
and in many cases demersal or demersal/adhesive ones.  Numbers of
fish eggs and larvae at Port Neal are highest in May, June, July,
which is consistent with the life histories  of  the  warm  water
fish  present  in  the  river.  Total numbers found in 1973, 1974
(Appendix Tables A-IV-B-2 and 3), and 1975 represented only a few
species   (Table IV-B-3),   including    unidentified    minnows,
freshwater  drum,  and  sauger.   Sauger  were  not abundant, the
minnows  and  drum  comprised  20   percent   and   79   percent,
respectively,  of  all  larvae found in the 1974 samples.  In the
1975 samples, minnows comprised 57 percent and drum  made  up  42
percent  of all larvae found.  Based on the median number of eggs
and larvae found in samples collected for entrainment on  May 23,
May 31,   June 22,  and  July 3,  and  July 19,  1973  (ie,  22.5
organisms), a gross estimate of 5500 eggs and larvae per day  may
be  given  for  the  combined  action  of  Neal  1-4  during  the
productive season.  About half that total would be  due  to  Neal
Unit >4  alone.   These  are  extremely crude estimates and recent
data provided by Hey and Baldwin3' indicate  that  at  times  the
numbers may be much higher.  Estimates based on 1974 data were as
high  as 500,000 larvae per day for Neal Unit 4.  These are point
estimates,  (see Table IV-B-4) and additional data  are  necessary
to produce more precise and representative projections.  However,
the  500,000  larvae per day is similar to that reported at Omaha
Public Power District's Ft. Calhoun Station.  During their May  7
to  July  24, 1974 survey, they reported a mean larval density of
31.56 per 100 m3.  Projecting this density to Neal Unit 4,  which
will  have  an  intake  volume  of  about 20  m3/sec., amounts to
                              IV-19

-------

Month
May




June



July



August



Species
Notropis spp
(minnows)
Sauger
Unidentified

Notropis spp.
l-'reshwater drum
Unidentified

Notropis snp.
Freshwater drum
Unidentified

Nortropis spp.
Freshwater drum

Condenser
Passage
42

4
0

108
82(>
6

101
132
1

3
4

Drift
Net
110

0
1

33
62
0

51
2
0

1
0


Total
152

4
1
157
141
88X
(i
1035
152
134
1
287
4
4
8
Source:  Hey and Baldwin-""-


Collection made at weekly intervals

Drift Net Data represent a composite of three, 5 minute drift net
samples (243 u)

Condenser Passage
Data represent a composite of 4 thirty minute samples for each date
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION Of EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
COMPOSITION OF FISH LARVAE FOUND IN DRIFT
NET AND CONDENSER PASSAGE (ENTRAINMENT)
SAMPLES FROM MAY -AUGUST 1974
SHEET 1 OF 2
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IV-B-3
                                         IV-20

-------

Month
May


June






July









August


Species
Notropis
Unidentified

Drum
Notropis
Bigmouth buffalo
buffalo
Goldeye
Unidentified

Drum
Notropis
Bigmouth
buffalo
Catastomus
Blue sucker
Centrarchidae
Ictiluridae
Unidentified

Notropis

Condenser
Passage
1
0

125
74





58
74



1

1


2
Drift
Net
18
1

202
272
2

1
1

31
131
1

1

1

1

2 I
^ 1

Total
19
1
20
327
346
2

1
1
677
89
205
1

1
1
1
1
1
300
4
~4
Collection made once a week in May and August  and  twice
a week in June and July

Time was the amount required to sample 4,300 gallons  of water
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
COMPOSITION OF FISH LARVAE FOUND IN DRIFT
NET AND CONDENSER PASSAGE (ENTRAINMENT )
SAMPLES FROM MAY-AUGUST 1975
SHEET 2 OF 2
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IV-B-3
(Cont.)
                               IV-21

-------
N3
                                                                                           Estimated Number Entrained
        Month







        May




        June









        July
       Species
        August
Notropis




Drum




Notropis




Drum




Notropis




Blue Sucker




Ictaluridae




Notropis

Number
Sampled
1
125
74
58
74
1
1
2
Volume
Sampled
(gal)
17,200
34,400
34,400
43,000
43,000
43,000
43,000
8,600


Unit 4
26,573
1,660,815
983,202
616,494
786,561
10,629
10,629
106,292
(per Day)

Units 1-4
67,751
4,234,450
2,506,793
1,571,826
2,005,432
2,725
2,725
271,004
        Based on  1975 condenser passage data;317,400 gpm intake flow for Unit 4;  491,850 gpm intake flow for Units  1-3.
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF E8ASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
POINT ESTIMATES OF FISH EGG AND LARVAE ENTRAINMENT*
NEAL UNITS 1-4 AND 4
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IV -B -4

-------
545,356  larval  fish  per  day.    Walleye  and  sauger  were   a
significant   part  of  the  entrainment  loss  at  Ft.  Calhoun.
Table IV-B-5 is offered so the reader may  parallel  these  first
approximations  with  fecundities  reported in the literature for
Missouri River species.  Some concern can be expressed  regarding
mortality   of   freshwater  drum,  walleye  and  sauger;  it  is
impossible to state unequivocably what  effect  entrainment  will
have on populations of these species in the river.

              ii.  Impingement

    Impingement problems arise at cooling water intake structures
for a variety of  reasons.  These  problems  are  dependent  upon
location,   physical  design,  intake  water  velocities,  screen
rotation, spray wash  velocities,  and  method  for  disposal  of
impinged  fish.   The  Environmental  Protection  Agency issued a
development document on proposed best  technology  available  for
minimizing adverse effects of circulating water system intakes.32
At  Neal  Unit 4, each of the above parameters as well as the EPA
developed information and results  from  the  biological  studies
described  previously  have  been  considered,  and the resultant
design should produce minimal fish mortalities.

    Impingement at Neal Units 1 and 2 was monitored from February
1974 through February 1975.  Data from these studies are given in
Appendix Table A-IV-B-4.  They represent all time periods  within
each  week,  and a variety of operating conditions (ie, number of
pumps and screens working).  Samples were  taken  from  three  of
four  intake bays for 16 hours per week from February through May
1974, and for 20 hours per week from June 1974  through  February
1976.    The  following  trends  were  observed  in  these  data:
impingement   rates   exhibit   seasonal   trends;    impingement
mortalities  are  depended upon the species of fish impinged; and
number of fish impinged exhibit  a  diurnal  periodicity.   These
trends are more readily observed in Table IV-B-6.

    Seasonal patterns of impingement result from a combination of
several factors. Small, weakly swimming fish are more susceptible
to impingement than larger fish.   In fact, 95 percent of the fish
in impingement samples taken at Neal Units 1 and 2 were less than
15 cm  long.   Small  fish  are more abundant in late summer when
young - of - the - year fish grow large enough  to  be  impinged.
Warmed  water, recirculated for intake deicing during the winter,
may attract fish to the intake and  increase  impingement  during
that  season.  Catfish,  in  particular,  may be attracted to the
structure due to increased temperature and the  shelter  afforded
them.   Brown  et al33 showed that channel catfish sought shelter
day and night when temperatures dropped below 4°C (39.2°F).  Fish
also exhibit decreased swimming ability  at  lower  temperatures.
This has been cited as a factor in increased impingement rates of
winter  flounder  at  Brayton  Point,  Massachusetts3*.  Hocutt35
examined  the  relationship  between  channel  catfish   swimming
performance  between  30°C/no  change and 30°C/15 drop.  Swimming
speeds of catfish, 14 to 15.4 cm long, subjected to a  15°C (59°F)
                                IV-23

-------
           Species
\  Carp (Cyprinus carpio)


  (.oldeye (Hiodon  alosoides),

  (ii//ard shad (Uorsoma cepedianurn)

  Carpsucker  (Carpiodes carpio)

  Bigmouth  buffalo (Ictiobus cyprint 11 us)

I  Channel catfish (Ictalurus  nebulosus)

  Walleye (Sti/ostedion  vitreum vitreuir,)

  Freshwater drum  (Aplodinotus grunniens)
       Number of Eggs Per  Female
30.000 to 1.400.000;  most authors reporting
about I '2 million

5.800 to  25.200 average  14.150

22.405 to 5.439.12 average 300.000

4.828 to  149.744 average 102.766

Average  400.000

200 to 70.000

50.000 to 400.000

200.000 to 400.000
 Sources:   Carlander—      Breder and Rosen—      Lopinot—
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF E6ASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
FECUNDITIES OF SELECTED SPECIES OF
MISSOURI RIVER FISH
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IV-B-5
                                             IV-24

-------
                    Mortality Rates, Total Mortality and
         Percent Abundance  of the Most  Commonly  Impinged Fish Species
                    Percent Mortality     Percent Total       Percent Total
                      Rate for each     Mortality of all    Abundance of all
     Species	   	Species	     Impinged Fish       Impinged Fish
Gizzard shad
Freshwater drum
Channel catfish
Bluegill
Carpsuckers
        67.7
        37.2
        13.7
         9.8
        33.3
54.8
21.3
 2.0
 1.1
 3.9
36.7
25.2
 6.3
 6.3
 5.2
    A  Comparison of  Collecting Times and Total Fish Sampled per Interval
                                                   Number of Fish
                Hours                                 Collected
                                                         100
                                                          84
                                                         112
                                                         145
                                                         179
                                                         147
       data represents compilation of all 24 hour per week studies
       from June 1974 through February 1975.
9
1
5
9
1
5
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
:00
a
P
P
P
a
a
m -
m -
m -
m -
m -
m -
1:
5:
9:
1:
5:
9:
00
00
00
00
00
00
P
P
P
a
a
a
m
m
m
m
m
m
                Hours
        8:00 a m
        1:00 p m
        7:00 p m
        1:00 a m
12:00 p m
 5:00 p m
11:00 p m
 5:00 a m
    Number of Fish
       Collected

            6
           11
           15
            8
       data represents compilation of all 16 hour per week studies
       from February 1974 through June 1974.
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF E8ASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
IMPINGEMENT DATA TRENDS NEAL UNITS 1 & 2
1974-1975
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IV-B-6
                                      IV-25

-------
temperature drop were above 1.38 fps.   King36  found that  channel
catfish  under  10.0 cm swam at a maximum rate of 1.1  fps.   Thus,
in winter, catfish coming in contact with the   traveling  screens
at  Units 1-3  might  not be able to escape.   In the case of Neal
Units 1 and 2 (Appendix  Table A-IV-B-4),  all  impinged  catfish
were   observed  between  the  months  of  September  and  April.
Seasonal changes in  river  water  levels  also  serve  to  cause
impingement variations.  As noted previously,  approach velocities
and  velocities  through the traveling screens are dependent upon
water levels. Finally, plant operations serve  to  cause  seasonal
changes  in  impingement.  For  example,  on  many  of the winter
sampling dates, only one of  the  two  circulating  water  system
pumps was in operation.

    Among  the  five  most  commonly  impinged  fish species, the
mortality rate ranges from  9.8  percent  for   bluegill  to  67.7
percent  for gizzard shad (see Appendix Table  A-IV-B-4) .  This is
undoubtedly due to species specific variations in response to the
factors mentioned previously.

    Diurnal variations in impingement rates are best demonstrated
in the data collected from June 1974, to February  1975.   During
this  period  of time, 471 fish were impinged  between 9:00 pm and
9:00 am, while only 296 were impinged in the 9:00 am  to  9:00 pm
sampling  periods.   A  similar  trend  can be  seen in the data
collected between February and June 1974, with 23  fish  impinged
during  the  7:00 pm to 11:00 pm, and 1:00 am  to 5:00 am sampling
periods, while only 17 fish were impinged during the  8:00 am  to
12:00  and  1:00 pm to 5:00 pm sampling periods.  When considered
on a monthly basis and subjected to  statistical  analyses  using
the  Wilcoxon matched pairs signed ranks test37 the combined data
were found to exhibit day/night differences  significant  at  the

-------
                            Time of Day
                         Length   Condition













Blue sucker
Carp
Carpsucker
Channel catfish
Drum
Flathead catfish
Goldeye
Green sunfish
Mirror carp
Notropis
Perch
Sauger
Shorthead redhorse
Smallmouth buffalo
Walleye
White bass
White sucker
Yellow perch
B
o
B E B B E E
U->
cd a, a a, ctj cs r-i
 i-i in a-i i-i m c
n)
i i i i i i jz
4-1
E E B B B B
CO
co oj a. a, a. 03 co
in ey> i-i m 
-------
Time of Day Length Condition
B
ca
a\
S
n)
in
Bigmouth buffalo
Black bullhead
Black crappie
Blue sucker
Carp
Carpsucker 2
Channel catfish 8
Drum 19
Flathead catfish 1
Gizzard shad 1
Green sunfish
No tr op is
Orange -spot ted
sunfish
Perch 1
S auger
Shorthead Redhorse
Smallmouth buffalo
White bass
White crappie
Yellow perch
Total 42
Crayfish 2
Note: Collection effort =
OIOWA PUBLIC
e
B B e e 6 °
m c
(X o, a, ca nj i-i ts
i-i m o> r-t m c w
es
1 1 1 1 1 xl M
u a)
BEEBE AJEd)
CO C8 CJ > T3
to ex &. ex nj en a) T-I aj
m M in r-i a)
«r> IH in a» 1-1 MO'-i 
-------



























M
<
1
K>
VO


















S
Q O
hi




2 •< ffl^
8-1

O "^
1
o

o

m








O
^
r-
m





















M
^
M
3
O
1
^/^ Q
sf |H
fl> ^ Q
rt O J^
ff H
O vC
M> — 1 Sj
CO j>

S
M
H
CO







O
^i
^^
^
-o
OJ
I™"

o

m
3D
^^
O
m
r»

i
z
m
^>
t—
=
15
.P,





^^
o < tf
J-J 1 l&>
rt W W
CL ^





^ n sssjcocfl^soo'Tianonwww
O *1 5^ P^ P> 3 p) (D O O H' I—1 1 3" 05 03 HJ h—1 H*
it 0) H H-H-f-'OJCHrri-'NOJgOJ'-i^COJOQ
Mi It (Dfl>fDhJfl>;3"O(1>0>!3" SCO OQ5TO
H- OJ ^SH •O'^HfD (DC H- C
w M cocrroo H-(DD.oi MO Merit
n y cojc co ex. j^i-iccr
O ocorr co o (D M
t-1 prcoiy crooj'i I-'CT'
re i-jo4 ex. rr HI tDMi
O C Ml H- OJ Ml
rt MI (-•• co ex. 0>
H- Ml CO y HJ
o oj y o
3 M
o
(D
Q
7j
it CO (-• O M
•P" l-'OCn |_j ^_i (jj |_> |_i i-i

N3 !-•
00 O N3 M J>-
O> M t-1 1— ' Ol-'l-1 CO ^JhOMCOH-1

M M CO f-» Cn (-«


M to,-,,-. M^O^VOMM
(Ti I-1 K-"

M I-"
*vj h-1 -P* 1 — * h-1 CO h-1 N3 H1 CO
















5 a m - 9 a m



9 a m - 1 p m

1 p m - 5 p m


5pm- 9pm
9pm- lam

1 a m - 5 a m






H
g-
g
o
Ml
!






•P- to

OO Cfl h-1
VO tOCOMl-1 COH-* VOMMCn h-«
Less than 15 cm
Greater than
15 cm

•P- N3
O CO I-1 CO ~J
CO h-1 CnOOUJOOCOtO t->-P-COOOvOvO IsJh-"
I-1
O "^J
h-> CO H-"N3 OO 1— ' M CO N3 Cyi (Ti 1— ' 1— '
Alive

Dead


f
m
w
cr
o
o
3
a
it
H-
o
3




-------
             Neal Units 1 & 2

Channel catfish
Drum
Alive
I
2
Dead

1
Total
1
3
Total                 3         1




         Collection effort = 24 hr
Neal Unit 3

Black bullhead
Blue sucker
Carp
Carpsucker
Channel catfish
Drum
Flathead catfish
Gizzard shad
Perch
Sauger
Shorthead redhorse
Smallmouth buffalo
White bass
Alive Dead
2
1
1
1 1
6 2
12 20
4
1
9
1
1 1
3
Total
2
1
1
2
8
32
4
1
9
1
2
3
Total                42        24




         Collection effort = 24 hr
66
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
IMPINGEMENT DATA, NEAL UNITS 1, 2 AND 3
FEBRUARY 22-28, 1976
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IV-B-8
                    IV-30

-------
screens with debris or ice,  stop logging an intake bay,  etc.   It
is  not  known  whether  these velocities persist on a day to day
basis or were peculiar to the sampling  date.   However,   if  such
high  velocities  have  characterized the operation of the Unit 3
intake, it would account for the observed impingement rates.

    It should be noted that the mortality of impinged fish during
the three month period  is  substantially  lower  at  Unit 3  (21
percent  of  impinged  fish)  than at Units 1 and 2 (36 percent of
impinged fish).  This observation  is  not  consistent  with  the
persistent   high   velocity   hypothesis.    Latent  mortalities
(mortalities occurring after removal from the screens)  are  also
probably high at Units 1,2 and 3, as only a high pressure screen
wash  is  used  and  additionally  in  the case of Units 1 and 2,
because fish are returned to the river in  the  heated  discharge
zone.

    It  is difficult to predict Unit 4 impingement effects on the
basis of the disparate data resulting from Units  1  and  2,  and
Unit 3   operations.  However,  it  appears  likely  that  Unit 4
impingement rates will be lower than those at Units 1 and 2.

    This  prediction  is  based  on  two  factors:  the  lack  of
operating  experience  at  Unit 3, and the superior Unit 4 intake
design.

    Operation of Unit 3 commenced in December 1975, approximately
one month before the impingement monitoring  program  was  begun.
As  operating  experience  is  gained,  it  should be possible to
optimize recirculated deicing water flow so that the  intake  can
be  kept ice free with a minimum of fish attraction to that area.
Operating experience should also help to  prevent  the  extremely
high velocities such as was observed on April 19, 1976.

    Intake  designs  for the four Neal Units have been previously
described in Chapter II.  Several design features of  the  Unit 4
intake  should help to reduce both impingement rates and the rate
of mortality resulting from immediate and latent impingement.

    The  design  low  water  level    (DLWL)   velocity    (maximum
velocities)  through  traveling screens at Neal Units 1,2, and 3
is 2.25 fps.  This  is  typical  of  most  existing  once-through
circulating cooling water systems (EPA32).  The approach velocity
to  the  screens  is 1.12 fps.  These maximum velocities occur in
winter when water levels are lowest.   During  the  rest  of  the
year,  the  velocity through the screens is less than or equal to
1.0 fps, and screen approach velocity is less than .8 fps.

    The DLWL velocity through  the  screens  at  Neal  Unit 4  is
0.9 fps, with the approach velocity equal to 0.4 fps.  Velocities
in  navigation  season  will  be  significantly lower (0.3 fps on
approach). Thus, the design specifications for intake  velocities
at Neal Unit 4 are lower than those of Neal Units 1, 2,  and 3 and
impingement rates, therefore, should be lower at Neal Unit 4.
                                IV-31

-------
    At  Neal  Unit 4, fish mortalities will be reduced further by
use of "fish buckets"  on  the  vertical  traveling  screens  and
sluicing the removed fish back to the Missouri River, upstream of
the  discharge  plume but at a point where they are not likely to
be re-impinged.  A sequential low and high pressure  screen  wash
system  will be employed (Exhibit II-B-4)  in order to remove fish
more gently from the traveling screens, and a vertical sand  weir
will be used in an effort to reduce crayfish entrapment.

    In  view  of present impingement rates at Neal Units 1 and 2,
considering the design  modification  established  to  date,  and
assuming  plant  operations  to  minimize impingement, ecological
effects of Neal Unit 4 impingement should be slight.  Although it
will be impossible to separate the impingement mortality  impacts
of  Neal  Units 1-4  from  effects  of habitat reduction, careful
monitoring should establish at least the  direct  mortalities  of
fish actually impinged.

         b.   Effect on Other Water Uses

    The intake system for Neal Unit 4 will have little impact  on
other Missouri River water uses.  The Missouri River is primarily
used  for  navigation  and  irrigation  in  the  vicinity  of the
proposed plant site. In addition, however, the river is a primary
source of  water  for  local  industry,  and  is  also  used  for
recreational purposes by the local population.

    A  total  of about 317,400 gpm of flow will be withdrawn from
the river and  utilized  for  condenser  cooling  water  by  Neal
Unit 4.   The  flow will be discharged directly back to the river
at a point located immediately downstream  of  the  intake.   The
proposed intake system will induce minimal consumptive water loss
on  the river  (approximately 20 acre feet per year) and therefore
will have little effect on the supply of  river  water  available
for  irrigation,  recreation  and  municipal  or industrial water
supply.

    During the navigation season, the plant intake  water  demand
will  represent  only about 2 percent of the total river flow. In
addition, the intake structure will be constructed on the bank of
the river and will not intrude into the river navigation channel.
Consequently,  the  proposed  intake  system   should   have   no
distinguishable impact on river navigation.

    2.   Discharge System

         a.   Effects on Missouri River Temperature Distribution

    This section presents the results  of  the  thermal  analysis
performed  for  the  proposed Neal Unit 4 condenser cooling water
system   (Reference  III-B-4)  along  with  a  discussion  of  the
applicable State and Federal thermal discharge criteria.
                                  IV-32

-------
              i.   State Thermal Discharge Criteria

    The information presented in this section has  been  obtained
from  the Water Quality Standards adopted by the State of Iowa on
February 12, 1974.

              •    Mixing Zone

                   The  Iowa  standard  applies  outside  of   an
              allowable  mixing  zone.  With regard to the mixing
              zone, the Iowa standard indicates that:

                   "The mixing zone shall contain not  more  than
              twenty-five  (25)   percent  of  the cross-sectional
              area or volume of flow in  the  receiving  body  of
              water."

              •    Thermal Discharge Criteria

              Iowa thermal discharge criteria state that:

                   "No heat shall be added to the Missouri  River
              that would cause an increase of more than 5 degrees
              Fahrenheit.   The  rate of temperature change shall
              not exceed 2 degrees Fahrenheit per  hour.   In  no
              case  shall  heat  be  added  that  would raise the
              stream temperature above 90 degrees Fahrenheit."

              ii.  Federal Thermal Discharge Regulations

    Final effluent Guidelines and Standards  for  Steam  Electric
Power  Facilities  were  published  in  the  Federal  Register on
October 8r 1974.  Essential points stressed in  these  guidelines
are summarized briefly here.

              •    Thermal Discharge Standards

                   Neal Unit 4 is required under Section  306  of
              the  FWPCAA to achieve Standards of Performance for
              New Sources.  These Standards require that:  "There
              shall  be  no  discharge  of  heat  from  the  main
              condensers except: (1) Heat may  be  discharged  in
              blowdown  from  recirculated  cooling water systems
              provided the temperature at which the  blowdown  is
              discharged  does  not exceed at any time the lowest
              temperature of recirculated cooling water prior  to
              the addition of the make-up water.   (2) Heat may be
              discharged  in blowdown from cooling ponds provided
              the temperature at which the blowdown is discharged
              does not exeed at any time the  lowest  temperature
              of recirculated cooling water prior to the addition
              of  the  make-up water." However, Section 316(a) of
              the  FWPCAA  does  provide  a  means  for   further
                                     IV-33

-------
              consideration  of  modification of thermal effluent
              limitations on a case by case basis.

    At the time an application for an NPDES permit is  filed  the
applicant  is  eligible  to notify the EPA Regional Administrator
that imposition of alternative thermal  effluent  limitations  is
requested  under  Section  316(a)   of  the  FWPCAA  and to submit
evidence in support of this  request.   Section  316 (a)  provides
that:

         "With  respect  to any point source otherwise subject to
    the provisions of Section 301  or Section  306  of  this  Act,
    whenever  the  owner  or  operator  of any such source, after
    opportunity  for  public  hearing,  can  demonstrate  to  the
    satisfaction  of  the  Administrator  (or if appropriate, the
    State) that any effluent limitation proposed for the  control
    of  the  thermal  component of any discharge from such source
    will  require  effluent  limitations  more   stringent   than
    necessary  to  assure  the  protection  and  propagation of a
    balanced,  indigenous  population  of  shellfish,  fish,  and
    wildlife in and on the body of water into which the discharge
    is  to  be  made,  the Administrator (or, if appropriate, the
    State) may impose an effluent limitation under such  sections
    for such plant, with respect to the thermal component of such
    discharge  (taking  into  account  the  interaction  of  such
    thermal component with other pollutants),  that  will  assure
    the  protection  and  propagation  of  a balanced, indigenous
    population of shellfish, fish, and wildlife in  and  on  that
    body of water. "

              iii. Thermal Prediction Model

    Missouri River ambient  temperature  characteristics  in  the
vicinity  of  the  Neal  Station  were evaluated and presented in
Section III-B.

    The  mathematical  model  used   in   this   study   is   the
Prych-Davis-Shirazi model.  This surface jet model was originally
analyzed  by  Prych*1  utilizing  Morton,  Taylor  and Turner1s*z
integral approach.  Recently, Shirazi and Davis*3  improved  this
model  by  calibrating  it with prototype and series experimental
results.

    Prych-Davis-shirazi*s thermal model appropriately  considers:
hydrological  and  physical characteristics of the Missouri River
(Reference III-B-11), such as: volume of flow, velocity  of  flow
and  cross-sectional area of the river**; meteorological factors;
such as: wind speed, air temperature and  wet  bulb  temperature;
plant  operational  characteristics  such as: temperature rise at
the discharge point, rate of  discharge  (volume,  velocity)  and
plant  capacity  factor;  engineering  details  of  the discharge
structure, such as: angle of discharge, depth  of  discharge  and
width of discharge.
                                IV-34

-------
              iv.  Temperature Rise Predictions

    The Missouri River temperature rise at the Unit  U  discharge
due  to  the  operation  of  Units 1-3 was understood to be the
completely mixed temperature rise resulting from the Units 1-3
discharge3',*o.  Previous analysis (Reference III-B-11) has shown
that the heated water discharge of Units 1-3 will be completely
mixed  in  the  river by the time it reaches the Unit H discharge
structure location.

    The impact of Units 1-3 downstream of the Unit U  discharge
represented as the completely mixed temperature rise is tabulated
below for various river flow conditions.
            Units 1-3
River Flow  Discharge
Rate (cfs)   Rate (cfs)
  6000*

  6000

  6500**

 20000***
1093

1093

1093

1093
Units 1-3
Capacity
Factor
(percent)
100
85
100
100
Units 1-3
Condenser
Temperature
Rise (°F)
19.5
16.5
19.5
19.5
Completely
Mixed
Temperature
Rise For
Units 1-3 (°F)

   3.51

   2.97

   3.24

   1.07
    * 1 in 10 year MA7CDLF for Non-Navigation Season
      (Iowa DEQ-Section III-B).
   ** 1 in 10 year MA7CDCF for Non-Navigation Season
      (Ebasco - Section III-B) .
  *** 1 in 10 year MA7CDLF for Navigation Season
      (Ebasco - Reference III-B-4).

    The  effective  allowable  temperature  rise  for  the Unit 4
discharge was computed by calculating the difference between  the
allowable  5° F  criterion  and  the completely mixed temperature
rise presented above.  The allowable temperature  rises  for  the
Unit  i*  discharge at various river flow conditions are presented
below.
                                IV-35

-------
                                                 Allowable
                      Unit 4      Unit 4         Temperature
            Unit 4    Capacity    Condenser      Rise Outside
River Flow  Discharge Factor      Temperature    The Mixing
Rate (cfs)   (cfs)      (precent)    Rise (°F)      Zone (°F)
  6000        705        100         17             1.49

  6000        705         85         14.5           2.03

  6500        705        100         17             1.76

 20000        705        100         17             3.93
    Exhibit IV-B-2 presents the predicted isotherm of the 1.49° F
allowable temperature rise (ier 5° F effective  temperature  rise
considering  effects  of  Units 1-3) for a river flow of 6000 cfs
and Units 1-4 all operating at 100 percent capacity factor.   The
Unit 4  discharge  velocity  is  6 fps which is the minimum value
proposed  for  low  flow  operation  and  represents   the   most
conservative   (high)    case   with   respect  to  thermal  plume
prediction.   The  downstream  and  off-stream  extents  of  this
isotherm  are  1410 ft  and  260 ft,  respectively.   The maximum
cross-sectional area  of  the  Missouri  River  affected  by  the
effective  5° F  temperature rise is 35 percent of the full river
cross-sectional area.

    Exhibit IV-B-3 presents the predicted isotherm of the 2.03° F
allowable temperature rise (ie, 5° F effective temperature  rise)
for  a  river  flow of 6000 cfs and Units' 1-4 all operating at 85
percent capacity factor.  This value is representative  of  daily
average  sustained  plant  operation  (Reference  III-B-11).  The
Unit 4 discharge velocity is 6 fps.  The downstream and offstream
extents of the effective 5° F isotherm  are  980 ft  and  210 ft,
respectively.   The  maximum  cross-sectional area affected is 24
percent.

    Exhibit IV-B-4 presents the predicted isotherm of the 1.76° F
allowable temperature rise (ier 5° F effective temperature  rise)
for  a  river flow of 6500 cfs and Units 1-4 all operating at 100
percent capacity factor.  The Unit 4 discharge velocity is 6 fps.
The downstream and offstream distances and maximum  cross-section
area affected are 1140 ft, 230 ft and 27 percent, respectively.

    Exhibit IV-B-5 presents the predicted isotherm of the 3.93° F
allowable  temperature rise (ier 5° F effective temperature rise)
for a river flow of 20,000 cfs and Units 1-4 all operating at 100
percent capacity factor.  The Unit 4 discharge velocity is  4 fps
which  is  the  minimum value proposed for average flow operation
and represents the most conservative (high) case with respect  to
thermal plume prediction.  The downstream and offstream distances
                                 IV-36

-------
              RIVER FLOW RATE : 6000 cfs

              RIVER VELOCITY: 12 fps

              JET VELOCITY: 6 fps

              PLANT CAPACITY FACTOR: 100 PERCENT
              CONDENSER TEMPERATURE RISE:   17°F
   600
UJ

u!  500
<

LO
O
I

U.
u.
o

UJ
o
CO

Q
   400
   300
   200
   100
         EFFECTIVE
           100  200  300  400  500  600  700  800   900   1000  1100  1200  1300  1400 1500   1600 1700  1800


                                    DOWNSTREAM  DISTANCE  FROM DISCHARGE IN FEET
    O
 envirosphere
   company
                                  IOWA PUBLIC  SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
                                THERMAL  PLUME  ANALYSIS OF THE UNIT

                                               DISCHARGE
                 DATE:
                                                                   SCALE:
                                                                                            EXHIBIT

                                                                                            IV-B-2

-------
UJ
UJ
u,
a:
o
u.
o

UJ
o
z
<

en
    600
500
    40°
    300
200
 100
                RIVER  FLOW RATE : 6,000 cfs

                RIVER  VELOCITY-. I.Zfps

                JET VELOCITY: 6 fps

                PLANT CAPACITY FACTOR: 85 PERCENT
                CONDENSER TEMPERATURE RISE:  14.5°F
           EFFECTIVE 5° F
                                                  PLUME CENTER LINE
            100   200  300  400   500   600  700   800  900   IOOO  1100  1200  1300  1400  1500


                        DOWNSTREAM DISTANCE FROM DISCHARGE IN FEET
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBA5CO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
THERMAL PLUME ANALYSIS OF THE UNIT 4
DISCHARGE
DATE: SCALE:
EXHIBIT
IV-B-3

-------
                RIVER FLOW RATE: 6,500 cfs

                RIVER VELOCITY. l.2fps

                JET VELOCITY: 6 fps

                PLANT CAPACITY FACTOR: 100 PERCENT
                CONDENSER TEMPERATURE RISE:  17°F
LU
U
u.
UJ
cr
o
X
CO
LJ
O
z
<
h-
co
    600
    500
400
    300
200
    100
          EFFECTIVE  5° F -,
                                                                  PLUME CENTER LINE
                                                                        N I t.K LINt —1
            100  200   300  400  500   600  700   800  900   1000  1100   1200  1300  1400  1500  1600

                          DOWNSTREAM DISTANCE  FROM DISCHARGE IN FEET
c
envirosphere
company
A UVI-MON OF tBASr.Q it^.ic:^ INCORMORVtD
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
THERMAL PLUME ANALYSIS OF
DISCHARGE
DATE:
- NEAL UNIT 4
THE UNIT 4
SCALE:
EXHIBIT
IV-B-4

-------
               RIVER FLOW RATE: 20,000 cfs
               RIVER VELOCITY: 2.4 fp«
               JET VELOCITY: 4  fps
               PLANT CAPACITY FACTOR: 100 PERCENT
               CONDENSER TEMPERATURE RISE:   17°F
UJ
UJ
LJ
co
   600
   500
   400
   300
UJ
o
2  200
CO
    100
EFFECTIVE 5* F
                                                 PLUME CENTER  LINE
                                                      33	
            100   200   300  400  500   600  700  800   900  1000   1100  1200  1300  1400  1500  1600  1700
                               DOWNSTREAM  DISTANCE FROM DISCHARGE  IN FEET
e
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICE? INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
THERMAL PLUME ANALYSIS OF THE UNIT 4
DISCHARGE
DATE: SCALE:
EXHIBIT
IV-B-5

-------
and the maximum cross-sectional area affected are 770 ft, 120 ftr
and 5 percent, respectively.

              v.   Results of the Thermal Analysis

    For a flow of  6000  cfs   and  the  Neal  Station  (4  units)
operating  at  100  percent  capacity  factor,  the maximum cross-
sectional area affected by the 5° F  effective  temperature  rise
isotherm  is  35  percent of  the full river cross-sectional area,
assuming a Unit 4 discharge velocity of 6 fps.

    For, the same flow of 6000 cfs  and  the  station  (4  units)
operating  at  85  percent capacity factor and a Unit 4 discharge
velocity of 6 fps, the maximum cross-sectional area  affected  by
the  5° F  effective temperature rise isotherm will not exceed 25
percent of the full river cross-sectional area.

    At a flow of 6500 cfs, discharge velocity of 6  fps  and  the
station  (4  units)  operating at 100 percent capacity factor, the
maximum cross-sectional  area  affected  by  the  5° F  effective
temperature  rise isotherm will not exceed 27 percent of the full
river cross-sectional area.  Based on the results at  a  flow  of
6000 cfs,  thermal criteria would be satisfied at 6500 cfs, 6 fps
and 85 percent capacity factor.

    For a river flow of 20,000  cfs,  and  100  percent  capacity
factor,  the  maximum  cross-sectional  area affected by the 5° F
effective temperature rise isotherm is estimated to be 5  percent
of the full river cross-sectional area.

         b.   Effects on Other Water Quality Parameters

    The impact on water quality associated with the discharge  of
once  through cooling water should be negligible since no biocide
additions will be  made.   The  only  effect  will  be  a  slight
alteration  in  the CaCO3 equilibriums resulting from an increase
in temperature.  The Langelier Saturation Index (LSI) is commonly
employed to calculate the state of  the  system  with  regard  to
CaCO3 equilibrium.  A negative LSI indicates that CaCO3 is under-
saturated  and a positive LSI indicates a concentration exceeding
saturation.  As the LSI is affected by temperature,  an  increase
in  temperature will result in an increase in the LSI.  Using the
data  presented  in  Section  III-C  and  assuming  that  calcium
hardness  is  approximately  65 percent of the total hardness, an
LSI of +0.5 is calculated.  A temperature increase of 17° F  will
result  in  an  LSI  of  +0.7.   The  increase  in  LSI  is of no
consequence, since the increase is temporary and will  return  to
ambient levels as the temperature returns to ambient.

         c.   Effects on Aquatic Ecology

    Waste heat should be the primary  source  of  impact  on  the
Missouri  River  due to coolant discharge.  Substances associated
with the chemical waste system will be treated to  meet  effluent
                               IV-41

-------
standards  prior  to  discharge.   These  wastes are discussed in
Section IV-E.  No adverse effects should be noted in the Missouri
River.  The levels of ammonia upstream of the plant site could be
a significant problem if Neal 4 were located above  the  existing
generating  station,  but  concentrations  at the Neal 4 site are
less than 0.5 mg/1  (Exhibit III-C-7).

    Effects  of  temperature  on  aquatic  organisms  have   been
extensively  reviewed*sr  22 r  «s,  46f  47,  *8r  *9r  so.    The
Environmental Protection Agency*sr si  has  excerpted  data   from
numerous  publications  on  the effects of temperature on aquatic
organisms, and Bush, et also have synthesized data in the form of
predicted displacement temperatures for fish  indigenous  to  six
North American rivers.

    At  the  primary producer level, Bott et al8 pointed out that
replacement of diatoms by green  algae  usually  takes  place  at
about  30° C  (86° F).   Temperatures  approaching  these optimum
ranges could be achieved within the 10° F (5.56° C) A T  isotherm
from  late  July  through  August at Neal Unit 4.  Based on  these
data and the predicted temperative isotherms from  Neal  Unit  4,
localized  short-term increases in green and blue-green algae can
be expected on the rocks below Neal Unit 4.  However,  periphyton
studies   taken   in   relation   to  the  existing  once-through
circulating water system at Neal Units 1-2, showed  no  clear-cut
patterns  of  diatom, green, and blue-green algae abundance  above
and below that discharge   (Appendix  Table  A-IV-B-5).   Plankton
studies  at  the  Neal  site  have not revealed any consistent or
important upstream/downstream differences due to present  thermal
discharges  either   (Section  III-C and Appendix Table A-IV-B-1),
and thus it is expected that the discharge from Neal 4  will  not
significantly  affect  the distribution and abundance of algae in
the Missouri River.

    The importance of zooplankton to the river ecosystem has been
discussed in Section IV-B-1.   Lethal  temperatures  reported  by
Bush  et also for zooplankton are generally higher than predicted
plume temperatures  (e.g. 30° - 38.5° C for Cyclops spp and  27° -
44° C  for  Daphnia  spp) .  Individual zooplankton are exposed to
plume temperatures  for limited time periods as  they  are  washed
downstream.   For   these  reasons,  no  substantial impact to the
ecosystem as a result of zooplankton exposure to the  warm  water
discharge is expected.

    Benthic  invertebrates  are also thought to contribute little
to the Missouri River ecosystem at the Neal  site.   Because  the
benthos  is  restricted  in  terms of movement, exposure to plume
temperature is long term.  The  potential  for  effects  is  thus
greatly   increased.   However,  abundance  and  distribution  of
invertebrates on colonizing test panels below Neal Unit  1  and  2
was  not systematically affected by the surface discharge of warm
water  (Section III-C).  There is no reason  to  expect   that  the
warmed  water  from the  Unit  4 surface discharge would cause a
different effect.
                              IV-42

-------
    Appendix Table A-IV-B-6 presents a compilation of  tolerance,
preference, or required temperatures of important fish species at
Neal  Unit 4.   Unless  otherwise  indicated,  lethal  thresholds
represent median tolerance limits.  The data  are  more  complete
for  some  species  than  others,  based  on  availability in the
literature.  It is  evident  that  some  of  the  most  important
species;   e.g., channel catfish, northern pike, carp, carpsucker,
and bullhead, exhibit high temperature tolerances as juveniles or
adults, and should not be adversely affected by the Neal  Unit  4
discharge.   However,  most  of  these  would  probably avoid the
immediate area of the discharge  (50 ft radius)  in mid-summer.

    Data  obtained  upstream  (control   area)    and   downstream
(affected  by thermal discharge) of Neal Units 1 and 2 by Hey and
Baldwin3*, 5* r sa indicated a  tendency  for  fish,  particularly
carp  and  carpsucker,  to be more concentrated in the plume area
than above it.   In  studies  conducted  from  June  to  November
197453,  it  was  concluded  that when ambient river temperatures
were below 70° F, fish, especially carpsucker,  were attracted  to
the  plume  area when compared to a downstream control.  However,
when ambient river temperatures were above 70° F,  fish  did  not
appear   to   be  attracted  to  the  discharge  plume.   Length-
frequencies of these species in April and May 1974 are  shown  in
Exhibits  IV-B-7  and  8.   It is apparent that, although lengths
were similar in the two reaches, numbers were greater  below  the
plant.    Additionally,   differences   in   condition   factors,
expressing relative  "robustness"  of  fish,  were  statistically
significant  between  upstream  and downstream groups, downstream
individuals displaying higher  weights  per  unit  length   (Table
IV-B-9).    No  data are available at Neal Units 1 and 2 regarding
the growth of channel catfish above and below the plant.  Andrews
and Stickney54 reported that fingerlings grew best  at  30° C  in
their lab experiments, which suggests that growth may be enhanced
in the Missouri River for much of the year.

    Distribution   of  other  fishes  listed  in  Appendix  Table
A-IV-B-6 may be affected differently by Neal  Unit  4  discharge.
For  example, in the April-November 1974 thermal plume attraction
study,53rss smallmouth buffalo was generally more abundant in the
warmed discharge plume than it was in  control  areas.   However,
numbers  are  not large enough to permit statistical treatment of
possible plume attraction.  Gammon56 indicated that  goldeye  and
smallmouth  buffalo,  as  well  as freshwater drum, gizzard shad,
white crappie, and  white  bass,  selected  the  coolest  thermal
regime  available to them in summer at the Wabash, Indiana plant.
Based on data in Appendix Table A-IV-B-6, a similar  pattern  for
Neal  Unit  4  is  predicted.   Sauger, white sucker and redhorse
would probably avoid mid-summer plumes.  Their summer preferences
are  given   as   27-29° C,s*    19-21° C*s;   and   26-27.5° CS6;
respectively.   None of the species present at Neal Unit 4 should
experience temperature-related mortalities.  They may  avoid  the
immediate  area  of the discharge plume in mid-summer, but should
be attracted to it during the  rest  of  the  year.   Temperature
differences  within  a  few  hundred feet of the discharge on the
                                IV-43

-------
zoo
             300
                         400
                           SIZE (mm.)
                                       500
                                                   600
                                                                700
envirosphere
company

IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
LENGTH-FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS OF CARP TAKEN UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM
OF NEAL 1&2 BY ELECTROSHOCKING, APRIL - MAY, 1974
DATE- SCALE:
EXHIBIT
IV-B- 7


-------
  CD
si
Q-0
33"
•<*
 o
    m
    z
    o.
    73
    m
  O
  oo n|
  H -<
  O -
  >
    -H

    O
s^

5>
  XI
m TI
|— oo
  o
  00
  o c:
    ~o
    00
    H
    73
    m
      oo
      O
      O
  
-------
                            R.mse ol' K*
                                                Moan K
                                                   I..'4
                                                               Moduli  k
                                                                                ol DitToroiKv
M.inn    Wining  I   lost (Sioiiol37)
A
envirosphere
company
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
CONDITION FACTORS OF CARP AND CARPSUCKtR TAKEN UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF
NEAL 1 AND 2 BY ELECTROFISHING APRIL-MAY 1974
DATE: SCALE:

1 ABU
1 \ -R .9

-------
Iowa shore would raise temperatures above spawning  and  egg  and
larval  development  requirements  for most species in May, June,
and July.  However,  no  important  spawning  grounds  have  been
recognized  there.  One possible species which may spawn near the
site is the channel catfish.  Improved  reproductive  success  of
this species below a power plant on the Wabash River, Indiana has
been   indicated   by  Gammon57.   Species  with  lower  spawning
temperature requirements, namely sauger, white crappie,  northern
pike, carp, and white sucker, spawn in different habitats.

         d.   Effect on other Water users

    Neal  Unit  4  is  not  expected  to  affect   the   chemical
composition  of  the  Missouri  River  other than as described in
Section  IV-B-2-b.   Also,  no  other  industries   are   present
immediately  below Neal Unit 4 which could require cooling water.
Thus, the  circulating  water  system  will  have  no  effect  on
downstream water users.

    During  the  winter  months,  the  Neal Unit U discharge will
affect river ice formation in  the  vicinity  of  the  plant  and
immediately downstream of the discharge structure. However, there
should  be  no  measurable  impact on ice formation downstream of
Synder Bend  and,  subsequently,  no  occurrences  of  downstream
flooding.
                             IV-47

-------
C.  ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS

    1.   Description of Basic Predictive Methodology

    Ground  level  concentrations   of   plant   emissions   were
calculated for 138 grid points within approximately 10 kilometers
of  the  Neal site (see Exhibit IV-C-1).  Consideration was given
in the grid selection task to those areas around the  site  which
were  most  likely  to  experience  high  calculated ground level
concentrations of contaminants.   The  basic  rationale  used  in
selecting the grid system is detailed below.

    Areas likely to be impacted by looping plumes during unstable
atmospheric  conditions  were  covered  by an inner circular grid
surrounding Units 1-3 and another surrounding Unit 4 at distances
of from 1-2 km.

    Areas  likely  to  experience  highest  concentrations  under
neutral  atmospheric  conditions,  or  during  incidents of plume
trapping due to an elevated inversion, were covered with an outer
circular grid at distances from 5-9 km from Units 1-3.

    Additional grid points were placed in the areas  of  elevated
terrain  southwest  and  north-northeast of the site, since these
areas could experience high concentrations due to plume impaction
during stable atmospheric conditions.

    Since the  diffusion  model  utilized  for  the  calculations
considers the physical separation of the stacks, the grid density
was increased in directions for which the stacks would be aligned
(i.e., NW, NNW, N and S, SSE, SE).  It is in these areas that the
emissions   of   all  four  units  could  impact  simultaneously,
resulting  in   high   ground   level   concentrations   of   air
contaminants.

    The  elevation  of each grid point was determined from United
States Geological Survey topographic maps of the area.  In  cases
where  higher  terrain existed in close proximity to a particular
grid point, the higher elevation was utilized for the grid point.
The locations and elevations of  each  of  the  grid  points  are
listed in Table IV-C-1.

    The  computerized  atmospheric  diffusion  model employed for
this study uses plant design  and  operating  parameters,  hourly
surface  meteorological  data  and  twice daily radiosonde  (upper
air) data as inputs.  One  full  year  was  chosen  based  on  an
examination  of  the meteorological data for the years 1960-1964.
Both surface and upper air data were readily available  from  the
National Weather Service in a computer-compatible format.

    This  examination  indicated  that  the  year   1963 exhibited
poorer diffusion characteristics  (i.e., lower average wind speeds
and  higher  frequencies  of  both  very  unstable   and   stable
conditions)  than  the  other  years considered.  Another earlier
                                 IV-48

-------
  envlrosphere
    company
* DIVISION OF E9A5CO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                                                 IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
LOCATIONS  OF  GRID  POINTS FOR AIR QUALITY  STUDY
                                                                                                                                     w
EXHIBIT


EXHIBIT

 IV-C-1
                        DATE:

-------
Grid
Point
Number

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
13
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
23
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
from Unit

Distance
(ire te rs )
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1S3S
2173
2562
2936
3253
3485
3615
3547
3352
3065
2709
2319
1953
1700
5000
7000
9000
5000
7000
9000
5000
7000
9000
5000
7000
9000
5000
7000
9000
1685
2 Stack

Direction
(+/- 11.25°
N
NNE
NE
ENE
E
ESE
SE
SSE
S
ssw
sw
'WSW
w
WNW
JNW
KNW
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SSE
SSE
SSE
S
S
S
S
SSW
N
N
N
NNE
NNE
NNE
NE
NE
NE
ENE
ENE
ENE
E
E
E
SW


Elevat ion

1076
1076
1074
1078
1074
1074
1075
1065
1070
1071
1075
1075
1075
1065
1082
1080 •
1080
10S2
1075
1075
108O
1075
1070
1070
1065
1067
1070
1073
1070
1065
1095
1090
1095
1089
1092
1089
1085
1086
1086
1080
1084
1082
1083
1080
1078
1065

3-hour
Average
469
908
638
438
262
468
687
744
286
416
379
282
131
128
296
401
443
500
458
420
369
362
298
294
335
419
304
336
409
527
261
210
220
493
378
314
237
221
176
246
193
164
328
233
179
571
SO;
24-hour
Average
64
125
80
61
36
62
87
93
36
52
50
36
24
16
37
50
80
114
107
96
81
69
50
50
56
69
50
63
58
78
49
54
58
107
82
67
45
30
27
36
30
25
55
53
43
71

Annual
Average
1.79
1.79
1.40
0.90
0.83
1.10
1.41
1.38
0.80
1.12
1.12
0.81
0.63
0.70
1.15
1.84
2.59
3.16
3.32
3.39
3.39
3.36
3.28
3.19
J.25
2.70
1.39
1.46
1.69
1.93
3.45
3.37
3.22
3.32
3.21
3.13
1.68
1.49
1.44
1.13
0.91
0.94
1.46
1.24
1.29
1.90
                   Particulates
 Annual
Average
 1.22
 1.24
 0.93
 0.57
 0.53
 0.71
 0.97
 0.97
 0.56
 0.77
 0.75
 0.53
 0.41
 0.44
 0.78
  .35
  .01
  .44
  .57
  .69
  .74
  .lit
  .68
  .63
 2.61
   07
   01
   04
   22
   43
 2.51
 2.42
   29
   39
   28
   18
   15
   03
 0.99
 0.78
 0.64
 0.65
 1.02
 0.89
 0.92
 1.38
24-hour
Average

   3
   6
   4
   3
   2
   3
   4
   4
   2
   3
   2
   1
   i
   1
   2
   2
   4
   5
   5
   4
   4
   3
   3
 •  2
   3
   3
   2
   3
   3
   4
   2
   3
   3
   5
   4
   3
   2
   1
   1
   2
   1
   1
   2
   2
   2
   3
 Annual
Average

 0.10
 0.1C
 0.08
 0.05
 0.05
 0.05
 0.07
 0.07
 0.04
 0.06
 0.06
 0.04
 0.04
 0.04
 0.07
 0,10
 0.13
 0.16
 0.16
 0.17
 0.17
 0.17
 0.17
 0.16
 0.16
 0.13
 0.07
 0.07
 0.08
 0.09
 0.18
 0.17
 0.16
. 0.17
 0.16
 0.15
 0.09
 0.08
 0.07
 0.06
 0.05
 0.05
 0.07
 0.06
 0.06
 0.09
24-hour
Average

   1
   1
   2
   1
   1
   1
   1
   1
   1
  . 3
   1
   1
   2
   1
   2
   2
   6
   7
   8
   9
   9
   8
   6
   9
   6
   5
   3
   3
   3
   2
   2
   3
   4
   7
   7
   7
   4
   4
   5
  10
   9
   8
   7
   7
   6
   2
                                                  HoSO/,
 Annual
Average

 0.04
 0.04
 0.03
 0.02
 0.01
 0.01
 0.01
 0.01
 0.01
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.03
 0.03
 0.04
 0.05
 0.04
 O.C5
 0.07
 0.0-3
 0.08
 0.09
 0.10
 0.09
 0.03
 0.06
 0.03
 0.03
 0.03
 0.03
 0.09
 0.13
 0.16
 0.09
 0.11
 0.15
 0.08
 0.08
 0.11
 0.08
 0.08
 0.10
 0.08
 0.10
 0.14
 0.04
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
MAXIMUM PREDICTED SO,, NO,, PARTICULATE
AND H2SOA CONCENTRATIONS 'NEAL UNITS 1-4
FOR EACH GR^D POINT
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IV-C-1

-------
 Grid
 Point
Number
 ',7
 48
 49
 50
 51
 52
 53
 54
 55
 56
 57
 58
 59
 60
 61
 62
 63
 64
 65
 66
 67
 68
 69
 70
 71
 72
 73
 74
 75
 76
 77
 73
 79
 80
 81
 82
 83
 84
 85
 86
 87
 88
 89
 90
 91
 92
                from Unit 2  Stack
Distance
(ire ters)
4634
5632
7000
9000
1414
4600
3637
5592
7000
9000
6583
4492
5457
5000
7000
9000
5COO
6000
7000
9000
5000 .
7000
90on
5000
7000
9000
5000
7000
9COO
5000
, 7000
9000
6433
2000
3000
5000
7000
9000
2000
3000
4000
5000
7000
9000
2000
3000
Direction
(+/-H.250)
SSE
SSE
ESE
ESE
NW
SE
HNE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SSE
SSE
SSE
SSE
SSE
S
S
S
S
SSW
SSW
ssw
sw
sw
sw
wsw
HSW
wsw
w
w
w
SSE
N
N
WNW
WNW
WNW
NW
NW
NW
NW
NW
NW
NNW
NNW
                                        Elevation
1070
1070
1080
1080
1080
1080
1065
1073
1070
1076
1063
1065
1075
107j
1072
1070
1080"
1175
1300
1210
1360
1380
1370
1320
1400
1400
1089
1450
1350
1080
1090
1100
1073
1075
1075
1080
1090
1093
1080
1080
1080
1086
1090
1095
1078
1090

3-hOur
Average
349
332
197
158
460
422
259
427
439
358
369
250
372
314
301
246
194
172
294
194
700
877
795
295
351
329
207
773
358
149
143
142
336
332
316
389
316
256
537
372
430
367
299
260
597
484
S00
24 -hour
Average
54
56
51
50
72
79
39
85
95
75
73
42
66
54
54
48
34
39
53
46
96
123
109
75
85
70
35
130
59
37
36
46
58
6
57
56
51
44
104
88
64
71
57
58
158
118

Annual
Average
3.57
3.99
1.99
1.98
1.95
3.76
3.06
4.20
4.46
4.81
4.27
3.61
3.77
4.00
4.51
4.86
1.66
1.98
2.96
2.28
3.79
4.17
3.88
2.00
2.58
2.50
0.95
3.98
2.06
1.00
1.16
1.40
3.36
3.08
3.48
2.12
2.64
2.95
3.00
3.38
3.42
3.59
4.23
4.69
5.51
6.64
                                                                                                   NO,
                                                                                                                    Particulates
                                                       Annual
                                                       Average
2.82
3.13
1.48
1.46
1.48
2.95
2.51
3.23
3.36
3.52
3.24
2.91
2.98
 .15
3.48
3.62
1.25
1.55
2.32
0.72
3.06
3.30
0.76
0.92
1.10
2.61
  26
  51
  62
  03
  25
2.24
2.52
2.58
2.79
3.28
3.58
4.20
4.58
24-hour
Average
3
3
2
2
4
4
2
4
5
4
4
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
5
6
6
4
4
3
2
7
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
5
4
3
3
3
3
8
6
Annual
Average
0.18
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.11
0.19
0.15
0.21
0.22
0.24
0.21
0.18
0.19
0.20
0.23
0.24
0.09
0.1.0
0.15
0.11
0.19
0.21
0.19
0.10
0.13
0.12
0.05
0.20
0.10
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.17
0.16
0.18
0.11
0.14
0.15
0.16
0.17
0.17
0.18
0.22
0.24
0.28
0.33
                                                                                                         HjSO,
24-hour
Average
9
6
4
3
2
13
9
16
18
18
17
7
3
8
6
13
4
4
7
6
6
12
15
4
8
11
3
24
12
8
7
7
6
2
3
6
13
13
2
4
6
4
6
7
7
7
Annual
Averaee
0.13
0.16
0.11
0.14
0.05
0.15
0.10
0.19
0.26
0.36
0.23
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.21
0.32
0.07
0.11
0.23
0.23
0.19
0.34
0.41
0.11
0.24
0.30
0.06
0.59
0.29
0.09
0.12
0.19
0.13
0.06
0.08
0.17
0.31
0.43
0.09
0.14
0.18
0.22
0.37
0.56
0.14
0.23
e
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF tBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
MAXIMUM PREDICTED S02, NOo, PARTICULATE
AND H2S04 CONCENTRATIONS NEAL UNITS 1-4
FOR EACH GRID, POINT
(ug/m3)
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IV-C-1
(cont'd)

-------
 Grid
 Point
Number
 93
 94
 95
 96
 97
 98
 99
 100
 101
 102
 103
 104
 105
 106
 107
 108
 109
 110
 111
 112
 113
 114
 115
 116
 117
 118
 119
 120
 121
 122
 123
 124
 125
 126
 127
 128
 129
 130
 131
 132
 133
 134
 135
 136
 137
 138
                from Unit 2 Stack
                                        Elevation
NNW
NNW
NNW
NNW
N
NNE
N
NNE
NNE
NNE
'NNW
NNW
NSE
NE
NW
NE
NNW
NNW
NW
NNW
NNW
N
NNE
NNW
NNW
N
E
E
E
ESE
SE
SE
S
s
S
ssw
ssw
s
SE
wsw
sw
ssw
ssw
sw
sw
sw
1095
1095
1080
1082
1090
1070
1098
1250
1300
1200
1100
1097
1300
1034
1095
1083
'1090
1092
1080
1090
1082
1086
1090
1098
1097
1095
1086
1085
1075
1077
1075
1075
1073
1075
1075
1075
1075
1065
1080
1380
1410
1350
1440
1320
1450
1440
534
491
386
351
288
331
176
178
375
252
218
219
409
145
197
143
328
345
396
445
616
421
202
220
258
191
307
302
419
245
333
500
304
188
274
470
508
190
511
937
582
505
1153
326
767
826

3-hour
Average
534
491
386
351
288
331
176
178
375
252
218
219
409
145
197
143
328
345
396
445
616
421
202
220
258
191
307
302
419
245
333
500
304
188
274
470
508
190
511
937
582
505
1153
326
767
826
SOo
24-hour
Average
126
116
92
77
48
58
48
47
50
53
77
61
57
24
73
32
71
79
76
97
116
125
49
86
89
49
38
45
52
54
83
114
40
35
38
71
74
24
67
122
77
76
158
45
92
103

Annual
Average
6.64
6.85
7.08
7.35
3.36
4.24
3.17
2.79
4.37
3.19
7.50
6.33
4.76
1.48
5.12
0.95
5.86
6.13
4.93
5.50
5.26
5.20
3.40
7.77
7.93
3.29
0.97
1.38
1.85
2.23
3.14
3.58
2.11
1.40
1.46
1.82
1.90
0.70
1.09
3.09
3.04
4.06
7.11
2.45
3.96
4.04
                                                                                                                   Particulates
4.96
5.15
5.27
5.35
2.44
 .30
 .17
 .92
 .07
 .21
 .38
 .60
 .40
1.00
3.87
0.65
4.40
4.56
3.71
4.08
3.90
3.89
2.41
5.54
5.71
2.37
0.67
0.98
1.32
1.67
2.44
2.82
1.60
1.04
1.06
1.30
1.41
0.46
0.72
2.47
2.30
3.28
5.77
1.86
3.09
3.29
24-hour
Average
6
6
4
4
2
3
2
2
2
3
4
3
3
1
4
2
3
4
4
5
6
6
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
3
5
2
2
2
3
4
1
3
6
4
4
8
2
5
6
Annual
Average
0.33
0.34
0.36
0.37
0.17
0.21
0.16
0.14
0.21
0.16
0.37
0.32
0.24
0.07
0.26
0.05
0.30
0.31
0.25
0.28
0.27
0.26
0.17
0.39
0.40
0.16
0.05
0.07
0.09
0.11
0.15
0.18
0.11
0.07
0.07
0.09
0.09
0.04
0.06
0.16
0.15
0.21
0.36
0.12
0.20
0.20
24-hour
Average
7
8
9
10
2
6
5.
6
10
7
12
13
9
5
10
4
6
5
7
8
7
5
6
14
14
3
1
1
2
4
7
15
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
5
7
12
4
6
12
18
Annual
Averase
0.28
0.34
0.47
0.67
0.08
0.20
0.87
0.24
0.36
0.21
O.S1
0.73
0.29
0.12
0.80
0.10
0.39
0.28
0.23
0.21
0.15
0.17
0.16
0.87
t.82
0.14
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.10
0.13
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.26
0.33
0.34
0.69
0.25
0.38
0.43
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
MAXIMUM PREDICTED SOo, N02, PARTICULATE
AND H2S04 CONCENTRATIONS NEAL UNITS 1-4
FOR EACH GRID POINT
(ug/m3)
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IV-C-1
(cont 'd^

-------
diffusion analysis for this plant (Ebasco Services Incorporated1)
confirmed the occurrence of the highest predicted  concentrations
based on 1963 meteorological data.

    The  hourly surface meteorological data used were recorded at
the National Weather Service first order station  at  Sioux  City
Airport,  8 km  north of the site.  Since radiosonde data are not
recorded at Sioux City, the  upper  air  data  utilized  in  this
analysis  were  obtained from the records of the National Weather
Service first order station at Omaha, Nebraska, which at  roughly
120 km  south  of  the  Neal  Station,  is  the nearest source of
radiosonde data.  Both the surface and upper  air  meteorological
data are reasonably representative of site conditions.

    A  detailed description of the operation of the STACK SELECT*
diffusion model is presented in Appendix A-IV-C.

    2.   Federal Regulations

    The  National  Ambient  Air  Quality  Standards  (NAAQS)   are
published  in  the  Code of Federal Regulations as 40 CFR Part 50
and are presented in Table IV-C-2.   The  primary  standards  are
pollutant  concentration limits designed to protect human health.
Secondary standards are welfare related.  These standards were to
be attained in the Iowa portion of -the  Metropolitan  Sioux  City
Interstate    Air    Quality    Control   Region   by   July 1975
(40 CFR 52.827).   Available  monitoring   data   indicate   that
standards have been attained in this region.

    New Source Performance Standards  (NSPS) have been promulgated
for  power  plants (40 CFR 60.40) and coal preparation facilities
(40 CFR 60.250).  Standards for power  plants  are  presented  in
Table IV-C-3.  These standards limit the amounts of particulates,
sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides allowed to be emitted from new
power  plants  and  the amounts of particulates allowed from coal
preparation  facilities.   The   NSPS   also   require   emission
monitoring  for  opacity,  sulfur  dioxide,  nitrogen  oxides and
either oxygen or carbon dioxide as outlined in 40 CFR 60.45.

    Implementation  of  the  federal  emission  and  ambient  air
quality  standards  are  the primary responsibility of the states
according to the 1970  Clean  Air  Act.   If  a  state  does  not
exercise  regulatory  control of air pollution, the United States
Environmental Protection Agency  (EPA) Administrator is authorized
to  perform  this  function.   Enforcement  of  federal  emission
standards  is  the  responsibility of EPA unless delegated to the
states.  The NSPS for power plants have been delegated  to  Iowa,
but coal preparation facilities have not.

    3.   Emission Rates

    As discussed earlier in this section, the Federal New  Source
Performance Standard for sulfur dioxide emissions from coal-fired
electric  generating  stations  is 1.2 Ib per million Btu  (mB) of
*Envirosphere Company


                              IV-53

-------


1)
2)
3)
4)
5)


Particulate Matter
a) Annual Geometric Mean
b) Maximum 24hr Concentration"''
Sulfur Oxides

a) Annual Arithmetic Mean
i /
b) Maximum 24 iir Cocnentration --'
c) Maximum 3hr Concentration
Nitrogen Dioxide

a) Annual Arithmetic Mean
Carbon Monoxide
a) Maximum
b) Maximum
Hydrocarbons
8hr Concentration
Ihr Concentration '

a) Maximum 3hr Concentration
(d am *•) am)
Primary Standard
(ug/irr »
75
260
80 (0.03 ppm)
365 (0.14 ppm)
100 (0.05 ppm)
10,000 (9 ppm)
40,000 (35 ppm)
H>0 (0.24 ppm)-/
Secondary Standard
(ug/mr)
60^
150
1,300
(0.50 ppm)
100 (0.05. ppm)
10,000 (9 ppm)
40,000 (35 ppm)
160 (0.24 ppm)£/

a' Guideline only, not a standard, h/ Not to he L.xcceded more than once per year.
c
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - MEAL UNIT 4
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IV-C-2

-------
Particulate Matter
a/
Emission Rate"- Ib/mB
I/
Opacity for over 2 min in any hr
Opacity at any time - percent
Sulfur Dioxide
Emission RattM Ib/mB
Equivalent sulfur content in fuel - percent —
C. )
Equivalent concentration in flue gas - ppnr
Nitrogen Oxides (as N00)
a/
Emission Rate-*' Ib/mB
Equivalent concentration in flue gas - ppn£'
Coal
0.10
20
40
1.20
0.5
600
0.70
500
Oil
0.10
20
40
0.80
0.7
400
0.30
200
Gas
0.10
20
40

-
-
0.20
150
    Emission rates are maximum 2-hr averages.

    Based on  typical  heating values of 9,000 and 18,000  Btu/lb  for coal and oil, respectively.
    Based on  typical flue  gas  compositions and expressed  on  a  dry volume basis.
d/  A maximum of 40  percent  opacity  is permissible for not more than  1 minutes in anv hour
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF [BASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - NEAL UNIT 4
FEDERAL STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IV-C-3

-------
heat input.  The typical sulfur content of 0.32 percent  and  the
heating value of 9507 Btu per Ib of the coal to be burned by Neal
Unit 4  will result in an SO2 emission rate of approximately 0.65
Ib per mB.  At full capacity operation, 3800 Ib/hr  of  S02  will
typically  be  emitted  from the stack. However, the SO2 emission
rates and the  ground  level  concentrations  presented  in  this
report  are based on a sulfur content in the coal of 0.49 percent
and a heating value of 8125 Btu per Ib of coal which would result
in a maximum SO2 emission rate of 1.2 Ib/mB.   At  full  capacity
operation,  a  maximum  of 7100 Ib/hr of SO2 will be emitted from
the stack.

    Emission rates for oxides of nitrogen are  almost  completely
dependent  upon the mode of operation of the Neal Unit 4 furnace.
The Meal Unit 4 furnace manufacturer guarantees that under design
conditions as discussed in Section II-B-4-b, the unit  will  meet
the  Federal  New  Source  Performance  Standard of 0.7 Ib/mB for
oxides of nitrogen.  A maximum of 4140 Ib/hr of  nitrogen  oxides
will be emitted into the atmosphere at full capacity operation.

    Suspended  particulate matter emissions will be approximately
0.07 Ib/mB for coal based on a maximum 18  percent  ash  content,
and on a 99.6 percent collection efficiency for the electrostatic
precipitator.    The   New   Source   Performance   Standard  for
particulate matter emission is  0.10  Ib/mB.   At  full  capacity
operation,  a  maximum of 420 Ib/hr of particulate matter will be
emitted.

    Ambient pollutant concentrations presented in this report are
based on the diffusion calculations using the  full  load  design
parameters  and  maximum  values  for  Neal  Unit 4  presented in
Table IV-C-4.

    4.   Ambient Air Quality

    The maximum predicted  ground  level  concentrations  of  all
contaminants   for  Neal  Units 1-4  and  for  Unit 4  alone  are
discussed below.

         a.   Sulfur Dioxide Concentrations

    The maximum  3-hour  average,  iraximum  24-hour  average  and
annual   average   ground  level  sulfur  dioxide  concentrations
calculated for each receptor point due to  the  continuous  full-
load  operation  of  Neal  Station 4  for  the  critical  year of
meteorological record are presented in Table IV-C-5 and  compared
to the Class II Significant Deterioration Standards.  The maximum
3-hour  value  of  378 ug/m3  is  54  percent  of  the  700 ug/m3
standard.  The 24-hour maximum value of 48.63 ug/m3 is 49 percent
of  the  standard  and  the  annual  average   concentration   of
3.13 ug/m3  is  1  percent  of the standard.  These SO2 values for
Neal Unit  4 are within the  Class  II  Significant  Deterioration
Standards.
                                 IV-56

-------








Parameters


Stack Diameter (ft)
Stack Height
(ft)
Sulfur Content (percent)
Coal Heating
Value (Btu/lb)
Particulate Release Rate (Ib/hr)
S09 Release Rate (Ib/hr)
NO Release Rate (Ib/hr as N09)
! X ^


Mass Release
Rate (106 Ib/hr)
Stack Exit Temperature (F)

envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED



Unit 1 Unit 2 : Unit 3 | Unit 4


10.2 15.2 19.8 25.8
250 300 400 469
0.9 0.9 0.9
0.49
9000 9000 9000 8125
150 410 270 420
2910 6170 10020 7100
2080 2470 4010 4140
1.60 3.33 5.41
6.55
300 263 254 244

IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY - MEAL UNIT 4
INPUT PARAMETERS FOR DIFFUSION CALCULATIONS
NEAL UNITS 1-4
DATE:
SCALE:











TABLE
IV-C-4

-------
Contaminant
Sulfur Dioxide


Nitrogen Dioxide
Particulares

Sulfuric Acid

Averaging
Time
3 hr
24 hr
Annua 1
Annual
24 hr
Annual
24 hr
Annual

Maximum
1,153
158
8
6
8
<1
45
1
Neal
Units
1-4
Typical Total
Back- Concentra- Minimum^
ground tion Standard
0
0
0
7
30
30
2
2
1,153
158
8
13
38
<31
47
3
1,300
365
80
100
150
75
- - -
- - -

Percent
of
Standard
89
43
10
13
25
41
--
--
Neal Unit 4
Predicted
Concentra
tion,
(ug/m )
378.63
48.13
3

2.88
0.19


Percent
** **
Standard Standard
(ug/m )
700 54
100 49
15 1

30 10
10 2


.'National  Ambient  Air Quality Standards
 Class  II  Significant Deterioration  Standards
c
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM PREDICTED GROUND LEVEL
CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS
(ug/m3)
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IV-C-5


-------
    The  maximum  3-hour  average,  maximum  24-hour  average and
annual average ground level sulfur dioxide  (SO2)   concentrations
calculated  for  each  receptor point due to the continuous full-
load operation of Neal Station Units 1-4 for the critical year of
meteorological record are presented in Table IV-C-5.  The maximum
3-hour value of 1,153 micrograms per cubic meter  (ug/m3)   is  89
percent  of  the  1,300 ug/m3 3-hour standard.  Less critical are
the 24-hour level of 158 ug/m3,  43  percent  of  the  365  ug/m3
24-hour   standard,  and  the  annual  average  concentration  of
8 ug/m3, which is 10 percent of the 80 ug/m3 annual standard.  As
discussed previously, background SO2 levels  are  negligibly  low
throughout  the  area  of  plant  air quality impact.  Therefore,
ambient SO2 concentrations are expected to be  within  applicable
standards.

         b.   Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations

    The  calculated  annual  average   nitrogen   dioxide    (N02)
concentrations  are presented in Tatle IV-C-5.  The maximum value
of 6 ug/m3 is 6 percent of the 100 ug/m3 annual standard.   After
adding the typical background concentration of 7 ug/m3, the total
of 13 ug/m3 is 13 percent of the standard.

         c.   Particulate Concentrations

    Table IV-C-5 presents the calculated maximum 24-hour  average
and  annual  average  particulate concentrations compared to both
the ambxent and significant deterioration standards.  The maximum
24-hour value of 8 ug/m3 is 5 percent of  the  150 ug/m3  ambient
standard.   Adding the typical* background level of 30 ug/m3, the
total of 38 ug/m3 is 25 percent of  the  standard.   The  maximum
annual  average is less than 1 ug/m3, which is about 1 percent of
the 75 ug/m3 annual  standard.   Adding  the  typical  background
level,  the  total  of  31 ug/m3  is  41 percent of the standard.
However, since background concentrations  of  particulate  matter
are both high and subject to great fluctuation, the use of only a
single  typical  background  level  is  not  sufficient to assess
compliance with applicable ambient standards.

    Primary ambient air quality  standards  for  total  suspended
particulates  were attained in 1976 in the Sioux City Air Quality
Control Region.  Since background particulate  concentrations  in
the Neal Station area of impact may be in violation of applicable
ambient  air  quality standards due to the high levels of natural
and agricultural dust, the potential incremental  effect  of  the
Neal  Station  on  existing  contraventions must be considered in
more  detail.   The  analysis  of  this  problem,   summarized  in
Table IV-C-6, is discussed below.
*Measurements  of  particulate concentrations in the Neal 4 area,
when represented using a log-normal frequency distribution, had a
median of 30 ug/m3 and a  geometric  standard  deviation  of  1.9
corresponding  to levels of natural and agricultural dusy typical
of rural areas,  (see Section III-E-1).
                                IV-59

-------




1— 1
<
0




Annual Neal Background Critical Additional
Receptor Downwind
Description Distance
Neal Sta. . .
... . . _ 2 km
Vicinity
Sioux City, „ ^


South Sioux ... .
„ , 17 km
City, Neb.
Direction Wind Station Atmospheric Plume Background Standard Background Violation
from Station Frequency Impact Stability Width Median Deviation Frequency Periodicity
NNW 11.0% 8 ug/m3 A or 1 1 sector 30 ug/m3 1.9 0.16% 16 yr
(sec. std.)
N 9.37. 2 ug/m3 D or 4 1/3 sector 50 ug/m3 1.8 0.17% 52 yr
(sec.

std.)

N 9.37. 2 ug/m3 D or 4 1/3 sector 130 ug/m3 1.7 0.24% 37 yr
(pri. std.)
0.98% 9 yr

envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
(sec.
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
TWENTY- FOUR HOUR PARTICULATE IMPACT/BACKGROUND
JOINT FREQUENCY ANALYSIS
DATE; SCALE:
std.)
TABLE
IV-C-6

-------
    It  has already been noted that background particulate levels
in the Neal Station vicinity may  exceed  the  150 ug/m3  24-hour
secondary standard about two days yearly.   Since the maximum Neal
Station   impact  based  on  continuous  full-load  operation  is
8 ug/m3, the background concentration at the point of the maximum
would need to be in the range of 142 to 150 ug/m3 for the plant's
impact to result in an additional violation.  From the background
particulate frequency distribution, the concentration would be in
this range 0.16 percent of the time, or  about  one  day  in  two
years.

    The  south-southeasterly  wind  required  to  carry  the Neal
Station plumes to the point of the critical concentration  occurs
with  an  annual average frequency of 11.0 percent, assuming that
the background  level  and  the  wind  direction  are  dependent.
Therefore,  it  can  be  seen  that  the  joint  frequency of the
background  level  and  the   wind   direction   being   critical
simultaneously  is  0.16 percent x 11.0 percent = 0.0176 percent,
or one day in 16 years.

    Actually, the  frequency  of  additional  secondary  standard
excesses  at  any  point due to the operation of the Neal Station
may be significantly lower, given the infrequency  of  the  large
atmospheric instability required to cause the plumes to impact at
the critical point.

    When  considering  the above results, it should be emphasized
that the large majority of ground level locations within the area
of air quality impact are subject to maximum Neal Station 24-hour
average particulate concentrations of much less than 8 ug/m3.  It
should  also  be  noted  that  because  of   Unit 4's   efficient
electrostatic   precipitator   and   tall   stack,   the   Unit 4
contributions are a small fraction  of  the  maximum  particulate
concentrations  attributable  to  the total plant.  For the above
reasons, the operation of Unit 4  is  not  likely  to  result  in
additional  excesses  of  ambient  particulate  standards  at any
location in the vicinity of the Neal Station.

    The considerations described above have also been applied  to
Sioux  City,  Iowa  and  South  Sioux  City, Nebraska.  Since the
maximum Neal Station impact is 2 ug/m3 at  these  locations,  the
critical  range  of  background  concentrations  approaching  the
secondary standard is 148 to 150 ug/m3.  Southerly  winds,  which
are  required  to  transport  the  Neal  Station  plumes  to  the
locations, are recorded in the Sioux City Airport with an  annual
average  frequency  of  9.3  percent.   Under  the  conditions of
maximum plant impact (neutral atmospheric stability),  the  plume
width  is  one-third  of  a sector.  Therefore, the wind actually
blows from the Neal Station toward  any  receptor  point  to  the
north  with  an  average frequency of 3.1 percent, or 11 days per
year.  The results based on this  frequency  and  the  background
level   distributions   indicate  that  an  additional  secondary
standard excess attributable to the combined effects  of  a  high
background level and the Neal Station impact may occur one day in
                               IV-61

-------
52  years at any ground level location in Sioux City,  and one day
in 9 years in South Sioux City.  Moreover, an additional excess of
the 365 ug/m3 primary 24-hour average  particulate  standard  may
occur in South Sioux City one day in 37 years.

    The  steady-state  assumption required by the diffusion model
(described in Appendix A-IV-C)  employed in  the  Sioux  City  and
South  Sioux  City  analyses  lends  conservatism to the results,
since the critical stability and wind conditions may not  persist
long  enough to transport the Neal Station plumes to the receptor
locations.  The maximum plant impact of 2 ug/m3 is only about one
percent of" the applicable standards.  Such low levels  are  below
the  sensitivity  of  the  high  volume sampler, and thus are not
directly measurable. Again, since the Unit 4  contribution  is  a
small fraction of the total plant impact, the operation of Unit 4
is  not  likely  to  result  in  additional  excesses  of ambient
particulate standards in the Sioux City-South  Sioux  City  area.
With  regard  to annual average particulate impacts, it should be
noted that the total Neal Station annual average impact at  South
Sioux  City was calculated to be only 0.2 ug/m3.  This presents a
negligible increase of the existing average background  level  of
130 ug/m3,  which exceeds the 75 ug/m3 annual average particulate
standard.

         d.   Sulfuric Acid Concentrations

    The calculated maximum 24-hour  average  and  annual  average
sulfuric   acid    (H2SO4)  concentrations  due  to  the  in-plume
oxidation of sulfur dioxide are presented in  Table IV-C-5.   The
maximum  24-hour  concentration of 45 ug/m3, added to the typical
background level of 2 ug/m3, results in a total  24-hour  average
of  47 ug/m3.   The  1 ug/m3  maximum annual value, when combined
with the typical background level,  results  in  a  total  annual
average of 3 ug/m3.  Because of the very conservative assumptions
employed in modelling the formation and transport of H2SO4  (e.g.,
steady  state  conditions  and conservative reaction rates) these
results should be considered as upper limits, not  likely  to  be
attained.

    Although  there are no applicable H2SO4 ambient standards, it
may be noted  that  the  threshold  limit  value  for  industrial
exposures  to  H2SO4  in   1,000  ug/m3.2 The most widely employed
standard for general populations is  a  24-hour  average  of  100
ug/m3.3  The  maximum  concentrations expected in the vicinity of
the Neal Station are well within these levels.
                               IV-62

-------
    5.    Effects on Terrestrial Biota

         a.   Effects on Terrestrial Vegetation

              i.   Effects  of  Sulfur  Dioxide  on   Terrestrial
                   Vegetation

    Sulfur  is  an  essential plant macronutrient and required in
relatively large amounts.  Sulfur dioxide (SO2)  which is taken up
by plants through leaf stomata* may be a source of sulfur for the
synthesis of sulfur-containing compounds.  Although the source of
sulfur is generally sulfate (SO4)  obtained  by  root  absorption
from  soil,  foliar  uptake  of  gaseous  SO2  has  proven,  under
laboratory   conditions,   to   be   an   alternative    source5.
Agricultural   soils   may  require,  for  maximum  productivity,
addition   of   sulfur-containing   fertilizers,   if   SOU     in
precipitation  and  soil  absorption  of  SO2 are insufficient to
compensate for depletion incurred by crop removal*.

    The  sensitivity  to  SO2  of  woody  plants  and   important
agricultural  species  of  the  George Neal area are indicated in
Table IV-C-7.  Few plants other than economically important  ones
have been investigated for sensitivity to S02.

    Concentrations of SO2 predicted from operation of George Neal
Units 1-4 are presented in Section IV-C-4 and summarized in Table
IV-C-5.   The  maximum   (including  background  level)  predicted
ground level 3-hour, 24-hour and annual concentrations of SO2 are
1153 ug/m3, 158 ug/m3, and 8 ug/m3, respectively.

    The maximum annual average SO2  concentration  predicted  for
George  Neal  Units  1-4,  8  ug/m3,  is  less  than the 13 ug/m3
concentration  reported  to  affect  lichen  species,  which  are
particularly  sensitive  to atmospheric pollutants.  Although the
effects of chronic exposure to low concentrations of SO2 are  not
generally  known,  it appears unlikely that the predicted maximum
annual concentration from George Neal Units 1-4 will injure flora
of the site and surrounding region.

    The predicted maximum 3-hour concentration of SO2 exceeds the
suggested injury thresholds  for  sensitive  plant  species.   If
conditions  conducive to plant injury occur concurrently with SO2
concentrations exceeding the suggested injury  threshold  levels,
sensitive  species  may  suffer  visible  injury.  The effects of
possible foliar injury  on  yields  of  known  sensitive  species
occurring  in  the  site  region,  alfalfa, soybeans, and grains,
depend on numerous factors and cannot accurately be predicted.

    The presence of other pollutants in addition to SO2, such  as
NO2  or  O3,  could alter the levels at which SO2 affects plants.
Available information on  plant  responses  to  mixtures  of  air
pollutants  is not adequately complete to determine of thresholds
applicable to field situations involving SO2  and  other  gaseous
pollutants.
                              IV-63

-------






























A. Woody Plants


Species
Juniper
(Jimi perns spp.)
Jack pine
(Piiuis hanksiana)
Austrain Pine
(Pinus nigra)
hastern white pine
(Pi nils s trot) us)
Red maple
(Acer rub rum)
Boxelder
(Acer iiegundo)
Sugar maple
(Acer saccharum)
Silver maple
(Acer saccharinum )
Birch
(Betual spp )
White birch
i Betulu papyrit'era)
(•lowering dogwood
(Cornus tlorida)
(ireen ash























(t:iaxinus pennsylvanica)
Tulip tree

( l.iriodendron tulipil'era )
Apple
( Mains spp. )
Sycamore
(Platanus occidentalism

o
envirosphere
company
A DIV SION OF EBASCO SERVICE? INCORPORATED




Sensitivitya
Tolerant
X



X



X

X

X

X





X

X

X





Intermediate










X



















Sensitive


X



X









X

X







X




IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
SENSITIVITIES TO SULFUR DIOXIDE OF WOODY AND
AGRICULTURAL PLANTS COMMON TO THE PORT NEAL AREA
(SHEET 1 OF 3)
DATE: SCALE:






























TABLE
IV-C-7
IV-64

-------
   Species
                                                       Sensitivity^
                                      Tolerant
                                 Intermediate
                                                                                 Sensitive
   Eastern cottonwood
   (Populus deltoides)

   Pear
   (Pyrus spp.)

   Red oak
   (Quercus ruhra)

   Black  locust
   (Robinia pseudo-acacia)

   Willow
   (Salix  spp.")

   American elm
   (Ulmus americana)

   Basswood
   (Tilia  americana)

   Mulberry
   (Morus spp.)

   Sumac
   (Rhus spp.)

   Honeysuckle
   (Lonicera spp.)

   Wild grape
   (Vitis  spp.)

   B.     Agricultural  Crops

   Soybeans
   (Glycine max)

   Alfalfa
   (Medicago  saliva)

   Potato
   (Solanum tuberosum

   Corn
   (Zea mays)
   Wheat
   (Triticum aestivum)
                X
                                      X


                                      X
                X
                                                             X
                                                             X


                                                             X
                                                             X
                                                              X
                                                              X
                                                              X
        c
   envirosphere
      company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
  IOWA  PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL  UNIT  4
  SENSITIVITIES  TO SULFUR DIOXIDE OF WOODY AND
AGRICULTURAL PLANTS COMMON TO  THE PORT NEAL  AREA

                  (SHEET 2  OF  3)
 DATE:
                                         SCALE:
  TABLE
 IV-C-7
(Cont'd)
                                              IV-65

-------
   Species
                                    Sensitivity'
                                         Tolerant
                                      Intermediate
                                        Sensitive
   Rye
   (Seeule eereule)

   Oats
   (Avena saliva)

   Red elover
   (Trit'oiumi sativuni)
                                                           X
                                                           X
                                                           X
    a    Compiled from references  11,  24,  25.
   envirosphere
      company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                          IOWA  PUBLIC SERVICE  Co. - MEAL  UNIT  4
  SENSITIVITIES  TO SULFUR DIOXIDE OF WOODY AND
AGRICULTURAL PLANTS COMMON TO THE PORT NEAL AREA

                  (SHEET 3 OF 3)
  DATE:
SCALE:
                                             IV-6 6
                                       TABLE
                                       IV-C-7
                                      (Cont'd)

-------
              ii.  Effects of Acid Rain and Sulfate Deposition on
                   Vegetation

    Acid rain may result from the oxidation of  SO2  and  NO2  to
sulfuric  (H2SOU),  sulfurous  (H2S03)   and  nitric (HNO3)  acids.
Rain with pH values as low as 2.1 has been  measured  during  the
past  20  years  in  samples  collected  in New Hampshire.   These
decreases  in  pH  have  been  tentatively  attributed  to   coal
combustion  and  consequent  increases of concentrations of these
acids in precipitation26.  The extent  to  which  stack  releases
from  coal  combustion  promote  acid  precipitation is currently
debated* ».

    Sulfate deposition may affect terrestrial systems by lowering
the pH of  rain  and  soil;  the  impact  of  SO4  deposition  is
therefore  discussed  in  terms of potential impact of acid rain.
Although high concentrations of SOU  have  been  associated  with
leaf   chlorosis*   and  inhibition  of  uptake  of  calcium  and
molybdenum,28 thesa effects have apparently not  been  attributed
to  the  deposition  levels  resulting  from  operation  of power
plants.  Deposition rates of sulfate (and soil absorption of SO2)
derived from coal combustion are small, even in heavily  impacted
areas,  when  compared  to  amounts  of SOU added to croplands to
offset sulfur losses by harvesting of crops29.

    Likens and Bormann26 state that "the  ecological  effects  of
acid  rain  are  as yet largely unknown, but potentially they are
manifold and very complex." They note that possible  consequences
of  acid  rain may include changes in leaching rates of nutrients
from plant foliage and soil, and long-term  decreases  in  forest
productivity.   Reuss29  concluded  that  acid  rain  leaching of
nutrients from soil  in  moderately  to  heavily  impacted  areas
"would  be  of  little  consequence  in  agricultural areas where
nutrients are commonly replaced, but may well be  significant  in
forests and areas not intensively farmed."

    Present  literature  suggests  that coal combustion may lower
the pH of rain within local or large regional areas.  It  appears
unlikely  that possible decreases of rain pH resulting from Units
1-4 will affect agricultural systems.  The  extent,  if  any,  of
rain pH change, and its potential effect on forest vegetation and
soils cannot be determined due to the present state-of-the-art.

              iii. Effects of Nitrogen Dioxide on Vegetation

    High concentrations of NO2 may cause plant injury.   Symptoms
of  acute  injury  are  similar to those resulting from excessive
dosages of SO2  described  in  the  preceding  section.   Chronic
injury  induced  by  NO2 is characterized by discolored flecks on
leaf surfaces, and premature leaf abscission*.   Plant  responses
to  NO2  vary  with  species,  lengths of exposure, developmental
stage of the plant, and environmental  conditions  such  as  soil
moisture and light intensity".
                                  IV -67

-------
    Concentrations  of NO2 which produce visible plant injury are
high, relative to ambient levels near fossil-fuel  power  plants.
Thompson  et al33 suggested the following threshold levels of NO2
for visible injury: 18,800-2,200 ug/m3 for 1 hour,  4324  -  6580
ug/m3  for  8  to 21 hours, and 1800 ug/m3 for 48 hours.  Limited
data suggest that plants exposed to NO2 for intervals longer than
48 hours may be affected by lower concentrations.   For  example,
the  yield  of  navel oranges decreased, and leaf drop increased,
following an 8 month exposure to 470 ug/m3 NO2.36

    Reductions in rates of photosynthesis may result from  short-
term  exposures to low concentrations of NO2.  Hill and Bennett37
observed a reduction in uptake of CO2 in oats and alfalfa exposed
for 0.75 to 1.5 hours to 940 - 1316 ug/m3 NO2.  They  doubt  that
significant  growth reductions would occur from inhibition of CO2
uptake, however, without foliar damage12.  Their data and that of
others  indicate  that  "plants  can  repeatedly   recover   from
subnecrotic exposures to SO2, C12, NO2, and NO if sufficient time
is  allowed  between fumigation for full recuperation.  Generally
an intervening nighttime period is sufficient."

    Plant injury caused by NO2 can be increased  by  simultaneous
exposure  to SO2.  A discussion of this effect is included in the
preceding section.

    Maximum concentrations of NO2  predicted  from  operation  of
Units 1-4 are presented in Section IV-C-4.  The predicted maximum
ground  level 1 hour, 4 hour, and annual averages are 2315 ug/m3,
816 ug/m3, and 13 ug/m3, respectively.  The  predicted  1  and  4
hour  maximum  concentrations  of  N02  were calculated using the
methodology discussed  in  Section  IV-C-1.   Concentrations  are
considerably  less  than  the NO2 levels suggested as potentially
injurious to vegetation, and are not  expected  to  significantly
affect plants of the site and surrounding region.

    Plant  responses  to mixtures of NO2 and SO2 are discussed in
the section which assesses the effects on vegetation of S02.

              iv.  Effects of Particulate Matter on Vegetation

    Information reported in the  literature  on  the  effects  of
particulates  on  vegetation is limited, and precludes a complete
assessment of impact.  Investigations of effects of  particulates
on  conifers  growing  near  a  power  plant in West Virginia are
inconclusive, and are not  considered  applicable  to  situations
where  fly-ash  removal systems are operating properly.  The lack
of information on fly-ash  injury  to  vegetation  suggests  that
particulate  emissions  from power plants with properly operating
fly-ash removal systems are not likely to injure vegetation.
                                IV-68

-------
         b.   Effects on Terrestrial Wildlife

    Sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter  may
adversely   affect  animals.   These  effects  depend  upon  many
factors, including the sensitivity of a given species to specific
emissions, period of exposure  and  physiological  conditions  of
exposed   organisms.    In  addition,  emissions  may  indirectly
influence animals by affecting the  quality  of  vegetation  upon
which they depend for food and cover.

              i.   Effects of Sulfur Dioxide on Wildlife

    Animals exposed in the laboratory to high  concentrations  of
SO2  show  upper  respiratory  tract  and  ocular  irritation and
bronchoconstriction43.   The   physiological   and   pathological
responses  of  animals to SO2 are shown in Table IV-C-8.  Most of
these studies have used concentrations of SO2 higher  than  those
predicted for the area within 25 km of the proposed station.

    The   maximum   predicted   three-hour,  24-hour  and  annual
concentrations of SO2  (including background) within 25 km of  the
proposed facility are  1153, 158, and 8 ug/m3, respectively  (Table
IV-C-5).   The  maximum  predicted  three-hour level of S02 (1153
ug/m3)  lies within the range of concentrations at  which  adverse
effects  on  laboratory  test animals have been noted.  Amdur and
Underbill4*  found  temporary   increases   in   pulmonary   flow
resistance  of  guinea pigs (sensitive to SO2) to 460 and 1310 ug
SO2/m3.  However, other investigations, reviewed  and  synopsized
by Talisayon43 have shown guinea pig pulmonary function and blood
chemistry  to  be  unaffected  by  year  long  exposures  to  SO2
concentrations of 240 to 15.0  x  103  ug/m3.   Overall,  present
knowledge  of the effects of low SO2 concentrations on animals is
not well documented, and"... the presence or absence  of  adverse
effects of ambient levels of the order of 0.1 ppm (260 ug SO2/m3)
is, experimentally, still an open question"43.

    The  effects  of both chronic and acute concentrations of SO2
from Neal Units 1-4 on local wildlife species cannot be predicted
adequately with  the  data  presently  available.   However,  the
information presented in Table IV-C-8 suggests adverse effects on
wildlife from SO2 emissions are unlikely.

              ii.  Effects of Sulfuric Acid Mist on Wildlife

    SO2 from  the  Units  1-4  stacks  will  undergo  atmospheric
oxidation  to  sulfate  (SO4).   A fraction of the SO4 formed may
exist as sulfuric acid mist (H2SO4).  Sulfuric acid mist has been
shown to be more toxic than SO2 in  experiments  with  laboratory
animals45.   The  predicted  maximum  24-hour  and annual average
ground level concentrations of sulfates  (taken complete as H2S04)
from Unit 1-4 are 45 and 3 ug/m3,  respectively  (Table  IV-C-7).
Concentrations  of  H2SO4  for  these  two  exposure  periods are
considerably lower than those tolerated by laboratory animals and
                             IV-69

-------
Stack Cuu':i.'i:l.raLion Li-n^Lli of An:. :il
Emission • (LII-,/;I!JI l>.r>t's'.ire 'IVi'ted Kffr,-i nr i- ...•nnnsc
SO 370 x 103 i54 hrs duino.-i Pigs LC 50-30 Percent. Mo r La lit
GO 3M x 103 847 hrs Mice, Cock- LC50-Mi.ce (l.isoct^ - Sir.i
roaches, Co Mice)
Grasshoppers
SO 460 and 1310 1 hr Guim-a Pigs Temporary increase in pul
* flow res is La nee
SO 79, 445, , 165 days Rats Sepresiicn oi r;-l c!,..;.li:i
2 17.8 x 10 "" ase, spl^.-n ci.- 1;y>.:r...-, , <-.:
hydra so, fine YiU.::.in C co
traticns in cor I." i:i cu^;an
SO 340, 2650, 1 yr Guinea Pigs No si ^:ii f ic.-ni <.lii"iorni;cc
2 15.0 x 10J pul:,.o.i.-:ry fu;;cti,v.i or cli
biochenical costs
SO. 1405-7673 14 v;i;s ;ioney Sees Hives gained less v.-cit-.:it,
iloCcci le;'S surplus ao:'.ey,
lecLed lest, pollen, and p
s-.:;aller jr.).)Js
SO 2.55 x 10 Honey Bees LC 50 for adnli.s, l.-irvae,
pupae v:. re 23,71, 147, ar.
1723 minutes, respectivol
j,,0 165 x 103 240m.i«. Kacs I.C 50
NO, 900 4 hr Rats ])e:-ranula tion in nnst rel
L pholofv of LIMIT
1900 1 hr Rats jje';r;mu1;i L.; en ir. mast eel
piiblo/y i;i lui;i:',
NO. 940 6-24 hr/day Mice Enlargement of alve.il i of
for 12 mos, enhanced r.u: cepLibility t
r espi ra r.oi'y infection as
strnt.ed by increased wort
after e.-posure to bacteri
(.CLciiicll;-' upe:r>'oniae_)
r i1. t ('• ifoncc
y (55)
:lar (55)
.-.onciry (46)
(43)
• o'~ -
ici_n-
s
s ii. (43)
niral
pro- (47)
cc.l-
roduced
etr-s, (47)
d
y
(48)
1 mor- (48)
1 mor-
lung; (48)
o
c er.ion-
ality
a
N0_ 470 4 hr/day Rabbits Structural changes in lung col- (48)
for 6 days lagen and el.'istin; condition
reversible but son;c damage per-
sisted after 7 days.
NO- 1500 Continuous, Rats Tachypnea and some terminal (48)
Lifetime bronchiolar hypertrophy
NO- 28.2 x 10 Continuous, Guinea Pigs Formation of circulating sub- (48)
1 yr stance in lung - possibly lung
antibody
GiOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
TOXICOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF SOa, NOz
envirosphere ON TEST ANIMALS
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED DATE I SCALED
TABLE
IV-C-8
IV-70

-------
therefore, are not expected to be  harmful  to  wildlife  in  the
vicinity of Units 1-4.

              iii. Effects of Nitrogen Dioxide on Wildlife

    Nitrogen dioxide exerts its primary toxic effect on the lungs
of  animals.   The  maximum  one  hour,  four  hour  and   annual
concentrations  of  NO2 (including tackground levels) from George
Neal Units 1-4 have been predicted at 2315, 816 and 13 ug NO2/m3,
respectively.  The one and four hour concentrations of  N02  were
calculated  using  the methodology presented in Section IV-C-1 of
this document, and the predicted annual concentration is found in
Table IV-C-5.

    The predicted one and four hour NO2 levels are in  the  range
of  concentrations  which  have  been  shown,  experimentally, to
produce  subtle  changes  in   lung   metabolism   (e.g.,   lipid
peroxidation  in  rat  lungs  and alteration of lung collagen and
elastin) and lung pathology (e.g., degranulation of mast cells in
rat lungs)*8.  However, most symptoms  appear  to  be  reversible
after short-term exposures to concentrations below 1900 ug NO2/m3
*8.   Although the reaction of wildlife species to various levels
of NO2 has not been ascertained, laboratory  experiments  suggest
that  potential  minor  and reversible lung damage to mammals may
occur during those periods of elevated NO2 concentrations.

    The predicted annual concentration of NO2r 13 ug/m3,  is  two
to  three  orders of magnitude below concentrations which, during
continuous lifetime and/or one year exposures, have affected rats
and guinea pigs respectively  (Table  IV-C-8).   No  experimental
data  suggest  that concentrations of 13 ug N02/m3 will adversely
affect wildlife in the George Neal Plant vicinity.

              iv.  Effects of Particulate Emissions on Wildlife

    Particulate emissions consist of heterogeneous  and  variable
mixtures   of   airborne   solids.    Ingestion   of   vegetation
contaminated by particulates containing toxic chemical components
may be detrimental to animal health.  Detailed assessment of  the
impact  of  the predicted concentrations of particulate matter on
wildlife cannot be made because of the paucity of  the  available
data.

    The  maximum  predicted  24-hour and annual concentrations of
particulate matter within 15 km of the proposed facility will  be
38  and  30  ug/m3,  respectively   (Table  IV-C-5).  The National
Secondary Standards for particulate matter are 150 and 60  ug/m3,
respectively.   The maximum 24-hour and annual concentrations are
not to be exceeded more than once per year.  Since the  predicted
particulate  matter  levels  of  the  proposed facility are below
standards which are designed  to  protect  and  conserve  natural
resources  and  environment,  no adverse effects on wildlife near
the site are expected.
                                 IV-71

-------
              v.   Stack Interference

    The stack of Unit 4 will be 469 feet high and about  26  feet
in  diameter  at  its top.  It will intrude into the airspace and
has a potential to obstruct  the  flight  of   birds,   especially
nocturnal  migrants.   Tall  structures,  such  as the Washington
Monument and television towers, have been noted  as  obstructions
to  migrating  birds56.  More recently, cooling towers and stacks
associated  with  generating  stations  have  been  reported   as
obstructions to birds57,5*,59.

    Neal Unit 4 is situated in the Missouri River Valley, a major
avian  flyway  during  fall  and  spring migration62.  A study of
nocturnal bird migration conducted in  Illinois  has  shown  that
approximately 20 percent of the migrants fly below an altitude of
500  feet63.   It is expected that bird mortality will be greater
in the fall than spring, owing to the large number of young birds
making their first migration.  Small passerines will probably  be
most  susceptible  to  collision  particularly  during  inclement
weather when a low cloud ceiling  forces  birds  to  fly  at  low
altitudes.

    Based  on  the above discussion and reports of bird mortality
at structures of similar height,57,so,59 there may be a potential
for bird collision with the stack at Unit 4.  It is difficult  to
accurately  estimate  the  extent  of  bird  mortality because 1)
mortality  studies  at  similar  structures  in  the  region  are
presently  not  available, 2) bird densities and migration flight
height past the site are not known, and 3)  the  state-of-the-art
in  predicting  mortality under various meteorological conditions
is not adequate at present.  However, the  narrow  dimensions  of
the   stack   may   preclude  any  significant  affects  on  bird
populations.
                                IV-72

-------
D.  IMPACT OF SANITARY HASTE SYSTEM

    There will be no discharge of sanitary wastes to the Missouri
River.  The treated effluent from the extended aeration activated
sludge treatment system will be discharged to  a  leaching  field
and  will  not  be monitored.  The characteristics of the treated
wastewater are expected to be as follows:

         Flow                          3500 GPD
         Suspended Solids              15-25 mg/1
         BOD                           15-25 mg/1
         Phosphorus                    10-15 mg/1 as P
         Total Nitrogen                20-30 mg/1 as N
         Total Dissolved Solids        500 mg/1

    The  sanitary  wastes  will  have  no  detectable  effect  on
groundwater quality.
                                 IV-73

-------
£.  IMPACT OF CHEMICAL DISCHARGES

    All discharges from the chemical waste and coal  pile  runoff
collection  and treatment system, described in Section II-B, will
be in compliance with all applicable Iowa, Nebraksa  and  federal
regulations.  As discussed in Section II-B, no chemical additions
will  be  made  to the once-through main condenser cooling water.
In addition, during normal plant  operations  no  water  will  be
discharged  from  any  ash handling operation; the fly ash system
will be pneumatic, the bottom and  economizer  ash  systems  will
employ complete recycling of all sluice water.

    The  following  estimate of water quality in the discharge is
based on average water quality in the Missouri River  and  normal
plant operation:
         Parameter                Mean

         pH                          8.0
         TDS(mg/l)           3000.
         Alkalinity  (mg/1)          65.
         Total Hardness  (mg/1)     550
         TSS  (mg/1)                 25
         Oil 6 Grease  (mg/1)       <10
         Total Iron  (mg/1)          <0.2
         Total Copper  (mg/1)        <0.2
         Flow  (CFS)                  0.73
          Range

           6.0-9.0
     1000-4000
            50-150
           300-600
            10-50
           <10-25
           <0.2-0.5
           <0.2-0.5
            0.1-1.5
    Based  on  the  above  estimates  there will be no measurable
effect on the water quality in the Missouri River resulting  from
the discharge of effluents from the chemical treatment system.

Coal Pile Runoff

    The quality of treated coal pile runoff will be as follows:

              Parameter                     Range
              pH
              TSS
              TDS
              Alkalinity
              Sulphate
              Total Hardness
6.0-9.0
less than 50 mg/1
less than 500 mg/1
less than 100 mg/1
less than 50 mg/1
less than 100 mg/1
    Coal pile runoff will be associated only with storm events.

Potential Leaching

    There  is  a potential impact by the seepage of leachate from
ash ponds.  This leachate may contain trace substances which  can
contaminate  ground  water  and  adjacent wetlands.  Self-sealing
capacity of the ash  pond  will  be  studied.   Analyses  of  the
                                 IV-74

-------
existing  ash  pond   (Neal  Unit  3) constituents will be used  to
determine the need or lack of need for pond lining.
                                IV-75

-------
F.  IMPACT ON LAND USE, RECREATIONAL SITES AND AESTHETICS

    1.   Land Use and Ovgrall Regional Character

    The facilities of the proposed project will be located  south
of  the  existing  Neal  Units  1-3.  The proposed project's coal
storage area will be located in the middle portion  of  the  site
and  the disposal area will cover the eastern portion.  The plant
structure will be situated in the western portion of  the  tract.
A  spur  from  the  rail  line  used for the existing George Neal
Station will service the site and connect it with  the  remainder
of the region.

    Existing land use in the region is primarily agricultural and
agriculturally  related.  Agricultural production within the four
county area of Woodbury and Monona counties, Iowa, and Dakota and
Thurston Counties, Nebraska accounts for approximately 90 percent
of the total land use of the Sioux City region.  Land devoted  to
agricultural  production  in  the  immediate vicinity of the site
accounts for 76 percent of total land use.  The  remaining  areas
include  forest,  grassland,  marsh,  and vacant land.  Developed
areas in the vicinity of the  proposed  plant  are  predominantly
industrial.   Of  major  importance  is  the Port Neal Industrial
District which encompasses nearly 3000 acres of  industrial  land
south  of the Sioux City Airport.  The proposed Neal Unit 4 is at
the southern extension of this District.  A central component  of
the industrial complex is the existing George Neal Steam Electric
Station.

    According  to the Woodbury County Planning and Zoning Office,
the Iowa  State  Office  of  Planning  and  Programming  and  the
Siouxland  Interstate Metropolitan Planning Council, there are no
comprehensive projects or plans at present for the  Neal  Unit  4
area  other  than  those  now  under consideration.  There are no
public services  (water and sewer) planned  in  the  area  in  the
foreseeable future.

    The  proposed  Neal  Unit  4  site is situated in a generally
sparsely populated area.  Across  the  Missouri  River  from  the
proposed  site,  in  Nebraska,  there  are  no  nearby population
concentrations or centers.  Roads are present to  the  north  and
east  of  the  proposed  site,  but on-site project roads must be
developed which tie into the existing system.

    The proposed 345 kV transmission  line  is  not  expected  to
adversely   impact   land  use  since  the  right-of-way  crosses
predominately agricultural lands  and  will  not  interfere  with
cultivation.Noknown historic sites,  archeologic  sites  or  game
management areas will be adversely impacted by  the  transmission
facilities.   Minimum impact on wildlife is expected because line
construction will alter little wildlife habitat.

    The easement area will consist of approximately 423 acres  of
real  estate.   Approximately  18  acres  of  the total 423 acres
                               IV-76

-------
consist of scattered tree growth.  It is estimated that  6  acres
of  the total 18 acres of tree growth will have to be removed for
the safe operation of the transmission line.   Approximately  405
acres  of  the  total  423 acres consist of open land (cultivated
land  and  pasture  or  hay  land).     It   is   estimated   that
approximately  2.2 acres of the total 405 acres will be taken out
of  production  due  to  transmission   line   structure   ground
encroachme nts.

    In  summary,  the  proposed  plant  site  is  situated  in an
industrially zoned  area  in  a  generally  agricultural  region,
adjacent  to  an  array  of  industrial facilities located to the
north.  Since a power generating station and  its  attendant  ash
handling,  coal  handling,  and related activities already exists
within the industrial district, the addition of Neal  Unit  4  is
not considered to be in conflict with present land use patterns.

    The impact of Neal Unit 4 becomes more complex when viewed in
respect    to    anticipated,   or   future,   land   use.    The
Snyder-Winnebago Bends Recreation Area (proposed for  development
by  the  U.S.  Army  Corps  of Engineers) could be a major public
recreation facility  in  the  vicinity  of  Neal  Unit  4.   When
completed,  the  park  will  extend along approximately seven and
one-half miles of the Missouri River south of Neal  Unit  4.   In
order  to  avoid possible negative visual impact here, it will be
necessary to maintain proper  coordination  with  the  developing
organizations of the proposed recreation areas.

    The  plant  building, disposal area, and coal facilities will
be visible for some distance, due to  the  flat  terrain  of  the
area.   Zones  from  which  the  proposed  site is highly visible
include: portions of Interstate Highway 29, several minor  2-lane
roads  on  both  sides  of  the  Missouri River, several existing
housing units scattered throughout the  area,  and  the  proposed
Synder-Winnebago  Recreation Area.  In order to contribute to the
reduction of visibility of various facilities  of  Neal  Unit  4,
implementation of landscaping techniques will be carried out.

    2.   Zoning

    The site of the proposed project occupies  an  area  entirely
within  a  "MH"  or  heavy industrial zoning district of Woodbury
County.   The  "Zoning  and  Subdivision   Ordinances   for   the
Unincorporated Area of Woodbury County," adopted January 1971 and
since  revised,  states that the heavy industrial district is the
least restrictive district of any district and may be  used  "for
any  purpose whatsoever", provided certain designated regulations
are met.  The proposed  project  is  not  in  conflict  with  the
provisions mandated for the district and is in general compliance
concerning permitted uses, (See Appendix A-IV-F) .

    Woodbury  County  zoning  in  the  area  of  Neal  Unit  4 is
presented in Exhibit IV-F-1.  The southern portion of the site is
shown as being situated in the "FPC District', or floodplain  and
                                 IV-77

-------
                     PROPOSED
                     NEAL UNIT
                     No.4
          P A V e D     ROAO

          GRAVEL    ROAD

          UNIMPROVED  ROAD
      CU
            I AG-AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT


       liiaiij fPC-FLOOOPLAIN  AND CONSERVATION  DISTRICT


       «&&Sf AR-AGRICULTURAL-RESIDENTIAL  DISTRICT


       iiiiiiij fl-IO - SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT


       A*iuli9 R-3O-MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
                               RMH-MOBILE HOME PARK DISTRICT


                         L—__JCG - GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT


                         H^H CHS-HIGHWAY SERVICE  COM MERCJAL DISTRICT


                         I'.:'•,,'','/.',\ m -I ir.HT INDUSTRIAL  DISTRICT


                               "" - "g ^"v INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT



                                 - PLAN DEVELOPMENT
   envirosphere
      company
A DIVISION Of EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                             IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. -  NEAL  UNIT 4
        WOODBURY COUNTY ZONING IN  THE
             AREA OF  NEAL UNIT 4
DATE:
SCALE:
                                           EXHIBIT
                                            IV-F-1
                                                 IV-78

-------
conservation  district.   This area has been rezonedr  however, to
industrial since map publication.

    3.   Visual Impactc Landscaping, and Horticultural Practices

    The potential visual impact of Neal Unit 4 concerns  exposure
of the plant buildings, stacks, disposal area and coal area.

    In  providing  for  the  restoration  and enhancement through
landscape treatment of the proposed project, two areas of primary
concern have  been  recognized.   One,  the  high  visibility  of
various   components   of   the   proposed  project  from  nearby
properties, roads, and proposed recreational facilities.   Second,
the restoration and landscape treatment of the proposed  site  to
blend  facilities  into  the existing environment and enhance the
visual setting.

    In areas where considerable  excavation  and  earth  movement
occur   during   construction,  landscaping  techniques  will  be
employed  to  return  the  site  to  appropriate   gradient   and
preconstruction  features.  Planting will be used to complete the
restoration process, to provide screening in certain  areas,   and
to  help relate the station structures to the visual environment.
Ornamental trees, shrubs, grasses, and other ground cover will be
applied as required in the immediate vicinity of the plant  area.
More than 31,000 native and ornamental trees and shrubs have been
planted  on  the  perimeter  of  the  plant  site  area to act as
barriers and screening in order to eliminate or mitigate views of
objectionable areas.  The use  of  ornamental  and  native  plant
materials  will  also  help  to  establish  stable conditions and
control any potential erosion, especially along the east bank  of
the Missouri River.

    4.   Fuel Supply

         a.   Mine Area

    The primary source of coal for Neal Unit 4 will  be  the  Red
Rim  area of Sweetwater and Carbon Counties in Wyoming.  A letter
of intent has been signed with the Rocky Mountain Energy Company,
a subsidiary of Union Pacific Corporation, to develop a plant for
a joint mining venture with the  Energy  Development  Company,  a
subsidiary  of  Iowa  Public Service Company.  Negotiations for a
formal agreement are in progress.

    An alternative source of coal for Neal Unit 4 could  be  from
mines  in  the Hanna, Wyoming area.  Three mines in this area are
currently under long-term contracts to supply fuel for Neal Units
1-3.  Since the Neal Unit 4 boiler will have  the  capability  to
burn coal with a wide variation in characteristics, the potential
for  supplying  Neal  Unit  4  from  mines  in the Hanna area, or
subsequently from mines in other  areas,  could  be  investigated
should  difficulties  arise in the negotiations for the Red River
area.
                                IV-79

-------
    The Energy Development Company, which will operate the Neal 4
mine,  has  implemented  operational  procedures  involving   the
leveling of stripped areas and replacement of topsoil followed by
reseeding of all areas with local grasses.

    Both   regional   and   site   specific   environmental   and
socioeconomic studies for the mine areas have been  completed  or
are  underway.   In all cases, the mining operations would comply
with all existing regulations such as  those  set  forth  by  the
State  of  Wyoming, U.S. Bureau of Land Management (43 CFR 3041),
U.S. Geological Survey  (30 CFR 211) and  the  U.S.  Environmental
Protection Agency  (40 CFR 434).

         b.   Fuel Delivery

    The coal will  move  by  unit  train  on  the  Union  Pacific
Railroad  which  presently  goes  through  the area.  The Chicago
Northwestern Railroad will take the unit trains  from  the  Union
Pacific Railroad at Council Bluffs, Iowa or Fremont, Nebraska and
deliver  them  to  the Neal Unit 4 site.  Since these are already
existing and active rail routes, except for the constructed  spur
to  the  site,  no  impact  on  land  use  or changes in regional
character are expected.
                               IV-80

-------
G.  NOISE IMPACTS

    1.   Introduction

    Daytime ambient sound measurements at the Neal  Unit  4  site
were  taken  on  March  18,  1975.  These measurements were taken
prior to any construction activities at the  site  and  reveal  a
residual sound level (approximating L90)  of 42 dB(A).

    The  following instruments were used during the sound survey:
one (1)  precision sound level meter and analyzer.  General  Radio
Company  Type  193*3 (ANSI - Type  1), Serial No. 620 with electzet
condenser microphone  Type  1962-9601,  Serial  No.  1367.   This
instrument  was  calibrated  just  prior to and immediately after
taking sound measurements with a sound level calibrator,  General
Radio  Company,  Type  1562-A,  Serial  No.  8710.   A microphone
windscreen was used to reduce wind effects.

    The impact of plant construction  activities,  operation  and
maintenance   and   transmission   facilities   on  the  existing
environments at the Neal Unit  4  site  is  discussed  in  detail
below.

    2.   Plant Construction

         a.   Noise Characterization

    At Neal Unit 4 the construction activities will last  through
November 1978 and are being carried out in the following discrete
stages,    each  of  which  has  its  own  characteristic  mix  of
equipment:

              Site "clearing and grading
              Excavations
              Foundations and concrete pours
              Structural steel and siding erection
              Equipment installation

    The work done during any one stage is often  concurrent  with
that of one or more other stages, such as work done on the siding
erection  and  simultaneous equipment installation.  Table IV-G-1
depicts major noise sources during plant construction  and  their
correspondent  average sound levels, and Exhibit IV-G-1 shows the
sound level  produced  by  the  construction  activities  at  the
nearest  residence  (4900 ft).  As can be seen from this Exhibit,
the construction site noise output  changes  as  work  progresses
from a maximum value of 55 dB(A) to a level of 20 dB(A) by August
1978.
                                 IV-81

-------
80
70
60
50
40f
30 -
20 H
10
M AY
I 9 76
                                 5 5
                                                                                                           5 2
                                                                                                                         20
                 AJGU S T
                  1977

CONSTRUCTION  TIME PERIOD
                                                                                                 APRIL
                                                                                                  1978
AUSUST
 1978
NOVEMBER
  1978
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION at EBASCO Sfvias irjcOBPORA'ED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY 	 GEORGE NEAL UNIT 4
CONSTRUCTION SOUND LEV ELS AT A DISTANCE OF ABOUT 4900 FT.
FROM THE PLANT CONSTRUCTION CENTER
DATE: SCALE:
EXHIBIT
TV-r.-l


-------
Equipment

Truck Cranes
Mobile Cranes (Cherry Pickers)
Backhoes
Graders
Air Compressors
Pickup Trucks
Trucks
Bulldozers
Front End Loaders
Scrapers
Crane Derrick
Crawler Cranes
Pile Driver
Steam Blowout
Average
Sound Level
(db(A))
83
83
85
85
81
58
91
80
79
88
88
83
104 dB Peak Impact
129
Distance From
Equipment
(ft)
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
MAJOR NOISE SOURCES
DURING PLANT CONSTRUCTION
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IV-G-1
IV-83

-------
    At the Neal site, the normal construction workday is based on
a  single shift, 8 hour day,  40 hour week, Monday through Friday.
However, extended workdays might be required as work progresses.

    Table IV-G-2 shows an  equipment  utilization  schedule  that
indicates  the  type,  quantity  and  operational  period  of the
equipment utilized during plant construction  (between  May  1976
and December 1978).  There will also be construction work done in
connection  with  the  holding pond dike and Table IV-G-2 depicts
the type and quantity of equipment associated with this work.

    At the end of construction and prior to  Neal  Unit  4  trial
operation  there  will  be  noise  produced by the steam blowout,
which is a temporary procedure that cleans the debris left in the
steam pipework.  At Neal Unit 4, the steam blowout operation will
use silencers that will  reduce  the  noise  output  during  this
process.

    Sound  level  estimates  for  individual  pieces of equipment
shown in Table IV-G-1 were used in conjunction with the plant and
dike equipment utilization schedule  shown  in  Table  IV-G-2  to
develop the temporal construction sound output at the Neal Unit 4
site.   The  sound level associated with each period was computed
by estimating the sound pressure  level  produced  by  individual
pieces  of equipment at a distance of 50 feet.  These levels were
added logarithmically and represent the  sound  produced  by  the
construction  activities  at  any  given period of time.  Exhibit
IV-G-1 depicts graphically the estimated sound  levels  projected
at   a  distance  of  about  4900  ft  (nearest  residence),  and
demonstrates  the  temporal  characteristics   of   the   station
construction activities.
         b.   Plant Construction Noise Impact

    The  representative  maximum  sound  level  of   the   entire
construction  period  was  projected  in  5 dB(A)  intervals using
hemispherical spreading and  molecular  absorption  as  shown  in
Exhibits  IV-G-2  and  3.  Two acoustic centers were selected for
the propagation model: one near the power  station  boiler  where
most  of  the construction activities are assumed to be centered,
and a second one in the center of the holding pond  to  represent
the  dike  construction.   The  dashed  contours shown in Exhibit
IV-G-3 depict the  sound  levels  produced  by  the  construction
activities  carried  out  in  connection  with the aforementioned
dike.

    As can be seen from Exhibit IV-G-1 the  maximum  sound  level
produced  by the station construction activities at a distance of
about 4900 ft. varies between 55 dB(A) and  20 dB(A)  during  the
construction  period   (May  1976 through November 1978).  Between
May 1976 and August 1978 the sound level ranges  between  52  and
55 dB(A),  and  between  August 1978 and November 1978 there is a
constant level of 20 dB(A).
                                 IV-84

-------
               PLANT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
1
1
1
1
1
8
4
1
3
1
4
2
1
                  Crawler  Crane
                  Crawler  Crane
                  Crawler  Crtane
                  Crawler  Crane
                  Crawler  Crane
                  Crawler  Crane
                  Truck  Crane
                  Truck  Crane
                  Truck  Crane
Manitowoc  4100
Manitowoc  4100
Manitowoc  4000
Manitowoc  3900
Manitowoc  3900
Koehering  65T
American   65T
Linkbelt   65T
Linkbelt   50T
65T Truck Crane
75T Stiffleg Derrick  -
14T Cherry Pickers
600 CFM Compressor  -
Front End Loader
Backhoe
Backhoe
Loader
3/4T Pickups  -
10T Dump Trucks  -
Pile Driving Rig
2-1/2 2T Flat Bed Trucks
Grader
   May  1976  to  July
   May  1976  to  June
   May  1976  to  May
   May  1976  to  December
   July 1976  to  April
   May  1976  to  September
   May  1976  to  September
   May  1976  to  September
   May  1976  to  September
   July 1976  to  July
   June 1976  to  August
   May  1976  to  September
   May  1976  to  September
   May  1976  to  September
   May  1976  to  December
   May  1976  to  June
   May  1976  to  September
   May  1976  to  December
   May  1976  to  September
   May  1976  to  August
   May  1976  to  September
   May  1976  to  September
1978
1978
1978
1977
1978
1978
1978
1978
1978
1977
1977
1978
1978
1978
1977
1976
1976
1978
1977
1976
1978
1978
                DIKE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE
14 cu.  yd .
D-8 Dozers
Grader
           scrapers
-  August 1976 to October 1978
-  August 1976 to October 1978
-  August 1976 to October 1978
e
envirosphere
company
* DIVISION Of EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co
PLANT AND DIKE CONSTRUCTION
- NEAL UNIT 4
EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IV -G -2
                                   IV-85

-------
PLANT  CC N S "RUCT ION  30UNC  CONTOURS

-------
envirosphere
company
10 * A
P L
DATE:
A

PU B L
N r

L
C

S E R v
ON S

C E C 0 M P
TRUCT

A H r
10 N

	 G E C R 5 E
SOUND

N E A L J M ! T
CONTOUR
SCALE:
4
S

EXHIBIT
IV-G-3

-------
    Construction noise levels are below the ambient  noise  level
(42  dB(A)Lgo)   and  would  be  only 20 dB (A)  without the ambient
noise level.

    Projections of the representative maximum sound level of  the
entire  construction  period as depicted in Exhibits IV-G-2 and 3
show that 12  houses  will  be  impacted  by  a  sound  level  of
40-55 dB(A).   These  houses  are  located  around the plant at a
distance of 4900-8400 ft southwest to east from the  construction
center.

    At   a   distance   of   3000  ft  south-southeast  from  the
construction  center,  the  maximum  sound  level  entering   the
proposed  Snyder-winnebago  Bends  Recreational  Area  will range
between 64 and 67 dE(A).  However, development  of  the  proposed
recreational  area  will  not  commence  prior to Neal 4 becoming
operational.

    The peak impact sound level  produced  by  the  pile  driving
operations at a distance of 4900 ft is estimated to be 64 dB(A).

    The  temporary silenced steam blowout will generate a maximum
sound level of about 46 dB(A) at a distance  of  4900  ft.   This
steam  blowout  will occur intermittently only during the initial
startup of the boiler and will not be repeated after the  station
is brought into operation.

    In conclusion, the construction activities at the Neal 4 site
are  not  expected  to create significant noise impacts, although
some sporadically high levels might occur.

    3.   Plant Operation and Maintenance

         a.   Noise Characterization

    The sound level's of major sources of noise that will have  an
impact  on  Neal  Unit 4 environs have been developed from actual
field  measurements  of  similar  coal-fired  plants,  analytical
calculations    and    data   supplied   by   various   equipment
manufacturers.  Table IV-G-3 depicts the  potential  major  noise
sources, their equipment location and the type of operation, e.g.
continuous or intermittent.

    Equipment  located indoors, such as the turbine generator and
pulverizers, radiate noise  through  the  station  siding  walls.
Because  Neal  Unit  4  is  of  an  indoor  type  design,  it  is
intrinsically quieter than a similar plant of the outdoor type.


    Maintenance activities usually consist of routine  inspection
and  replacement  of  machinery  parts  such  as  pumps and motor
components.  These activities  produce  sound  levels  which  are
normally lower than plant operation sound levels.
                                   IV-88

-------
                    Equipment
  Turbine  Generator
  Pulverizer
  Induced  Draft  Fan
  Forced Draft  Fan
  Primary Air  Fan
  Boiler Feed  Pump
  Boiler Feed  Pump  Turbine
  Main  Transformer
  Auxiliary  Transformer
  Emergency  Diesel  Generator
  Power Control Valve Discharge Pipe
  Public Address System
  Coal Crusher
  Stacker Reclaimer
  Coal Conveyor
  Coal Car Shaker
  Precipitator Rapper
  Auxiliary Boiler
  Safety Valve Discharge Pipe
*C = Continuous
 I = Intermittent
                                                    Type of*
                                                    Operation
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C
            Equipment
             Location
Indoor
Indoor
Indoor
         Indoor
         Indoor
Indoor
Indoor
Outdoor
Outdoor
Indoor
Outdoor
Indoor/Outdoor
Indoor
Outdoor
Outdoor
Outdoor
Indoor

Outdoor
A
envlrospnere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co.
MAJOR NOISE SOURCES DURING
- NEAL UNIT 4
PLANT OPERATION
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
IV-G-3
                                      IV-89

-------
    Ten major sound systems were selected as being representative
of continuous operation of Neal Unit 4.  They are as follows:

         •    Two induced draft fans

         •    Two induced draft fans motors

         •    Two forced draft fans

         «    Two primary air fans

         •    Coal conveyor

         •    Power station building

         *    One main transformer

         *    Two auxiliary transformers

         •    Coal crusher house

         •    Plant ventilation system

    Sound  attenuation,  by   using   materials   of   acoustical
treatment, has been provided as follows.

              i. Plant Building

    The  power  station  building  will be totally enclosed.  The
turbine generator, boiler, pulverizers and other major  auxiliary
equipment are located indoors.

    The  plant  building will employ a four foot, eight inch high
concrete block wall around the periphery of the unit.   From  the
top  of  the  concrete block to the tuilding roof, the walls will
consist of metal' siding, both  insulated  and  uninsulated.   The
coal  crusher  house  walls  and  the  circulating  water  intake
structure walls will be made of insulated metal siding.

              ii. Forced Draft and Primary Air Fans

    The two forced draft and two primary air fans will be located
in the fan room which will be made of twelve inch thick  concrete
block.   Silencers installed in the enclosure wall will attenuate
fan inlet noise.

         b.   Plant Operation And Maintenance Noise Impact

    The ten representative noise  sources,  taking  into  account
sound    attenuation    as   discussed   above,   were   combined
logarithmically  and  projected  in  5  dB(A)   intervals   using
hemispherical  spreading  and  molecular  absorption  as shown in
Exhibit IV-G-4.  Because the stacker-reclaimer is  located  about
2,800  feet  from the power station building, it was necessary to
                                  IV-90

-------
OO         0        10(X)       3000       fOOO      4UOO       5000       6000       7000 FEET
e
envirosphere
company
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICt COMPAN
PLANT OPERATION
DATE:
Y — 6EORSE HF.Kl UNIT 4
SOUND CONTOURS
SCALED
EXHIBIT
IV-G-4

-------
select two acoustic centers for the plant  operation  model:  one
for  the stacker-reclaimer and a second for the rest of the plant
centered on the power station building.

    At a distance of 4900 ft.  north  of  the  plant  center  the
continuous sound level produced by the plant operation will be 60
dB(A),  which  is  equivalent to a day-night sound level (Ldn)  of
about 66 dB(A).  One existing dwelling unit will be  affected  by
this value.

    At  a  distance  of 3000 ft. south-southeast of the plant,  in
the  proposed  Snyder-Winnebago  Bends  Recreational  Area,   the
maximum  daytime  sound level produced by the plant will be about
65 dB(A) or an Leg of 65 dB(A).  Under the Noise Control  Act  of
1972, EPA is required to develop criteria identifying the effects
of  noise  on  public  health  and  welfare and specify the noise
reduction necessary for protection with  an  adequate  margin  of
safety.   EPA's  basic  "levels" document, which identified noise
levels requisite to protection of public health and welfare,  was
published  in  March  1974.   It concluded that virtually all the
population is protected against lifetime hearing loss when annual
exposure to noise, averaged on a 24-hour  daily  level,  is  less
than  or  equal to 70 A weighted decibels.  The noise level found
requisite to residential outdoor enjoyment is Ldn < 55 dB.

    The results of the  analytical  calculations  have  indicated
that a maximum Ldn=66 dB(A) at the nearest residence could result
from  the normal operation of Neal Unit 4.  The primary source of
the noise is the unsilenced induced draft fans.   Provisions  are
being  made  to  allow for the installation of silencers on these
fans if, after operation, the noise from the plant is found to be
unacceptable.  Due to the significant cost associated with  these
silencers,  the  probable conservatism in the analytical analysis
and the lack of residential dwellings in close proximity  to  the
plant,  the  installation  of  silencers on these fans may not be
necessary at the present  time.   However,  IPS  is  prepared  to
conduct   a  boundary  noise  survey  after  plant  operation  is
initiated.

    Equipment such as the  auxiliary  boiler  safety  valves  and
station  power  control  valves  operate  intermittently  and  at
unpredictable intervals and are  not  included  in  the  previous
calculations.   The maximum "silenced" sound level  (intermittent)
emitted by the emergency diesel generator at a distance  of  3000
ft.  will  be about 42 dE(A) , and about 35 dB(A) at a distance of
4900 ft.

    The coal car shaker operates intermittently and only  in  the
winter  when  frozen  coal  might te delivered to the plant.  The
coal shakeout operation could take place every two days with  the
arrival of the unit train and would last intermittently for about
seven  to  eight hours.  The estimated sound level emitted by the
coal car shaker  entering  the  proposed  Snyder-Winnebago  Bends
Recreational  Area  (2500 ft.)  will be about 57 dB(A), and at the
                                IV-92

-------
nearest two residences (4500  ft.  east)  about  47  dB(A).   The
estimated  sound  level  at  about 4500 ft. east of the unloading
hoppers for regular coal deliveries is expected to be 53-59 dB(A)
due to the operation of coal car bottom hopper doors.


    Maintenance activities at Neal Unit 4 such as replacement  of
machinery  parts  will generate a limited amount of noise without
any significant impact on noise sensitive land uses.

    In conclusion, plant operation and maintenance activities  at
Neal  Uhit  4 may have an adverse noise impact on the surrounding
area due to estimated noise levels of  unsilenced  induced  draft
fans.

    4.   Transmission Facilities

    The additional transmission facilities required in connection
with Neal 4 will include two segments:

         •    A line 1.82 miles in length of 345 KV, and

         •    A line of approximately 23.3 miles in length of 345
         KV.

         The maximum noise level  produced  by  the  transmission
facilities  at  the  right  of  way  line  is estimated to have a
maximum value of 48 dB(A), which is not  expected  to  create  an
adverse environmental impact in the area.
                              IV-93

-------

-------
                 V. - EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES


A.  ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES

    Iowa  Public  Service  Company  (IPS),  in  tne  process   of
selecting  coal as the energy source for Neal Unit 4 (a base load
unit), evaluated several alternatives which included:

    •    Not Providing Power

    •    Nuclear Power Plant

    *    Oil-Fired Power Plant

    •    Natural Gas-Fired Power Plant

    •    Gas Turbine Power Plant

    •    Hydroelectric Power Plant

    •    Diesel Generator Power Plant

    *    Other Energy Sources
           Solar
           Wind
           Fusion

    The  evaluation  of  alternatives  considered   environmental
impacts, engineering feasibility, and economic factors associated
with each alternative.  On the basis of this evaluation, which is
described  in  detail  in this section, coal was selected because
there are reserves of low  sulfur,  low  ash  coal  available  at
comparatively low cost and because the environmental impacts of a
coal-fired  facility  can  be  maintained  at  a  minimal  level,
possibly less tnan that for the  other  alternative  fuels.   The
appropriateness  of  selecting  low  sulfur  western  coal as the
energy source is further  evidenced  by  the  following  detailed
review of the above mentioned alternatives that were evaluated.


    1.   Not Providing Power

    Justification of the need for power is described in detail in
Section I-C.   Though  Iowa  Public  Service  Company  (IPS)   has
stopped  promoting the sale of electric power and has initiated a
conservation effort, the area served  by  IPS,  Interstate  Power
Company,  Northwest  Iowa  Power Cooperative, Northwestern Public
                                   v-i

-------
Service Company, and Corn Belt Power Cooperative,  the five  major
owners  of  Neal Unit 4, have exceeded previous forecast figures.
The most recent prediction by these companies, the  Mid-Continent
Area Power Pool, and the Mid-Continent Area Reliability Agreement
region  shows  that electric power deficiencies will occur in the
latter part of this decade.  The remaining eight owners  of  Neal
Unit  4 are Iowa municipalities which need electric power to meet
their long-range growth projections.

    The five major owners of Neal Unit 4  are  regulated  by  the
public  service  laws  of  their  respective  states and they are
required to provide electric service to their  customers.   Based
upon  the  anticipated energy requirements in the service area of
the Neal Unit 4 owners, as presented  in  Chapter  I,  additional
generating capability is essential to meet future needs.

    Furthermore,  if  the  possibility  of restricting service is
viewed as an alternative to Neal Unit 4, it becomes apparent that
without an increase  in  the  generating  capabilities  of  these
utilities  and  municipalities,  the  supply of electrical energy
will be less  than  adequate  for  customers  and  for  municipal
programs.   Such  a  condition  when  applied "across the board,"
would restrict the use of  electricity  for  a  wide  variety  of
applications and would lead to curtailment of industrial growth.

    In  view  of the obvious hardships which would result for the
utilities' customers and municipal programs and in view of  their
legal  obligations  as  public  utilities, the alternative of not
supplying power is not feasible.
    2.   Nuclear Power Plant

    An economic study of various alternative  plans  for  meeting
the  future  power  requirements  of the Mid-Continent Area Power
Pool was conducted by a joint intercompany task  force  in  1970.
Units  of  various  sizes  and fuel sources were considered.  The
results of this study indicated that a nuclear installation could
be considered from the standpoint of cost.

    However, because of the protracted time period, approximately
8 to 10 years, required for installation of  a  nuclear  unit  as
compared  to approximately 4 to 5 years required for installation
of a fossil-fueled unit, a nuclear facility  for  1979  operation
was eliminated as an alternative.
    3.   Oil-Fired Power Plant

    The annual oil requirement for Neal Unit 4  would  amount  to
approximately  193,000,000  gallons at 50 percent capacity factor
with a maximum hourly consumption of 44,000 gallons.
                                   V-2

-------
    In terms of national policy  objectives,   oil  is  much  more
valuable  to  the  overall  economy of this country for its other
uses, which include space heating.  In addition,  current  policy
calls for converting existing and new oil-fired plants to coal to
further conserve oil resources.

    Thus,  oil was not considered acceptable as a fuel supply for
the proposed unit.


    4.   Natural Gas-Fired Power Plant

    Another alternative fuel is natural gas.   However, there  is,
at present, a shortage of natural gas throughout the country, and
no  large  scale  additional  supplies  can  be  anticipated with
reasonable certainty.

    The nearest major natural gas transmission  pipeline  in  the
proximity  of  the  proposed  unit  is  owned and operated by the
Northern Natural Gas Company.  Due to  the  severe  gas  shortage
that  has persisted over the past few years,  the Northern Natural
Gas Company is  not  selling  gas  to  new  large  nonresidential
customers  and nas even refused to increase deliveries to present
customers.

    Natural gas requirements for the proposed unit  would  amount
to  approximately 27.5 billion cubic feet per year or 740 million
cubic feet per day at 50 percent capacity  factor.   Furthermore,
the  existing  major  gas  transmission line which services Sioux
City  is  operated  at  its  maximum  capacity.   Thus,  even  if
sufficient  gas  were  available  for  the proposed unit, the gas
transmission line would not have the capacity to supply the  gas.
In order to supply gas to the proposed unit from this line at the
prescribed  high  pressure,  it  would  be necessary to construct
either a new loop line or add  a  compression  station  to  boost
pressure  or  both.  The increased costs and environmental impact
of such an undertaking would be significant.

    For the above reasons,  and  in  line  with  national  policy
considerations which prefer gas usage for other purposes, natural
gas was eliminated as a fuel source.


    5.   Gas Turbine Power Plant

    Since early 1962, electric utilities  have  rapidly  expanded
their  use of gas turbines to drive generators during peak loads,
and to fill capacity gaps caused by delays in bringing base  load
units  on  line.   Gas  turbines  are  generally unsuited for the
continuous operation that is required of base load units  due  to
maintenance   requirements  and  low  efficiency.   In  addition,
because gas turbines would be fueled by either gas or oil,  which
are  in  short  supply,  gas  turbines  have been eliminated from
consideration.
                                   V-3

-------
    6.   Hydroelectric Power Plant.

    Hydroelectric  power  plants  have   been   eliminated   from
consideration because there are no feasible sites for such plants
that  would  meet the base load requirements of IPS by the end of
this decade.

    A pumped storage project would be  unsuitable  because  of  a
lack  of  feasible  sites  for  such plants and because base load
capacity is required.


    7.   Diesel Generator Power Plant

    There are several plants of IPS employing diesel  engines  to
drive generators.  These plants are very small and cannot be used
for  base  loading,  and  for  the  same  reasons  given  for gas
turbines, are impractical.
    8.   Other Energy Sources

    As a result of the shortage of energy sources in  the  United
States,  several new techniques are being sought by government as
well as industry to develop energy.  These sources have potential
commercial use but are not feasible for application to  meet  IPS
needs by the latter part of this decade.

         a.   Sol ar

    Based on available technology, the  practical  conversion  of
solar energy is limited to space exploration and other unique and
small scale applications such as residential use.  The time-table
for application on a large-scale is too distant to consider solar
energy as a viable alternative for Neal Unit 4 requirements.

         b.   Wind

    Although wind powered generators are commercially  available,
the  largest  unit  has  only  about  a 2MW capacity.  Due to the
intermittent nature of wind and  the  need  for  storage  of  its
energy,  wind  is  not  capable  of providing reliable and steady
production of power.

         c.   Fusion

    A fusion reactor derives its power  from energy releases  when
very  light  elements are combined to form heavier elements.  One
of the environmental advantages of this mode of power  generation
is  expected to be a significant reduction in the amount of waste
heat rejected.  At the present time, technology to generate power
on a commercial scale has not been developed.
                                   V-4

-------
B.  ALTERNATIVE PLANT SITES

    In  anticipation  of  the  need  for  additional  power,  the
applicant  (IPS)   initiated  a  survey  to  identify  and analyze
candidate sites capable of accepting two 600 megawatt (MW)   coal-
fired  generating  units.   Neal  4, as the first of these units,
would be required to be operational in 1979 while a second  unit,
as  yet unidentified, may be anticipated at some future date.   As
in most site selection surveys,  efforts  are  made  to  identify
those   candidate   sites   offering  the  most  flexibility  for
additional power  generation  development.   The  utilization   of
these  sites  for  subsequent units, however, may not be realized
but would offer opportunities in  accumulating  an  inventory   of
potentially viable locations for future needs.

    Criteria established for the survey included the following:

    •    The  site  should  be  suitable  for   development   and
         construction  leading  to  initial  power  generation in
         1979.

    •    Environmental  impact  due  to  plant  construction  and
         operation should be minimal.

    •    The unit should be capable of burning low  sulfur  coal,
         and  the stack effluent should meet the National Ambient
         Air Quality Standards.

    •    The ash pond on the site should be sufficient in size to
         provide for the accumulation of 30 years of ash with  the
         plant operating at an  average  capacity  factor  of   60
         percent.

    •    The site should be suitable for a closed-cycle condenser
         cooling  water  system  with  evaporative  type  cooling
         towers,  except  for  one  site  located on the Missouri
         River.  For this site, consideration was  given  to  the
         feasibility of once-through cooling.

    Prior to the applicant's decision to construct on the present
site,  the following five locations, identified on Exhibit V-B-1,
were considered in the site selection survey.  In addition to  the
Neal site on the Missouri River, three  candidate  sites.  Lizard
Creek, Holiday Creek and £oone River, are on the Des Moines River
in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Dodge,  Iowa,  while  the  remaining
candidate site is on the Cedar River in the vicinity  of  Nashua,
Iowa.

    The   survey   included  both  qualitative  and  quantitative
comparisons of the  candidate  sites  taking  into  consideration
engineering/site development factors and environmental factors.
                                   V-5

-------
 e
'irospher
  envirosphere
    company
A DIVISION OF ffl«fO SERVICES IN
                                                      IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE'COMPANY - MEAL UNIT 4
EXHIBIT

 V-B-1

-------
    1.   Lizard Creek Site

         a.   Site Description

    This site is located about four miles west of the Des  Moines
River, on Lizard Creek in the Fort Dodge area.  It was determined
that at this site the plant would utilize a portion of the Lizard
Creek  basin as a makeup water storage reservoir.  It was further
determined  that  damming  would  be  necessary  at  a   location
approximately  one  mile above the confluence of Lizard Creek and
the south branch of Lizard Creek.  A 400 acre ash pond  would  be
located  on a bluff east of the north-south leg of the reservoir,
approximately one mile from the plant area.

         b.   Engineering and Site Development Factors

    This site requires an additional 560  acres  for  the  makeup
water  storage  reservoir.  The land requirement of approximately
550 acres for the plant island, cooling tower area, coal  storage
and  ash  disposal  area  is  the same as for the other candidate
sites.

    At this site the till is from 80 to 110 feet thick  underlain
by  shale  and  sandstone.   Therefore,  piles  can  be  driven a
reasonable depth to a firm base on the shale and sandstone.

    This site would require a 2 mile spur from  the  Chicago  and
Northwestern  Railroad  line;  however,  it  would tie in between
Clare and Tara just north of Lizard Creek.  The site  would  also
require improvement of about one mile of light duty road.

    As indicated above, the system includes reservoir storage for
makeup  water.   This  would require a pumping station on the Des
Moines River at its nearest point to the reservoir.  Water  would
be  pumped to the reservoir from the Des Moines River to maintain
the reserve supply at maximum levels.  The makeup water  for  the
cooling  tower  system  would  be  supplied directly from the Des
Moines River when the  flow  is  sufficient  to  permit  pumping.
However,  during low flow periods the makeup water would be drawn
from the storage reservoir.

         c.   Environmental Factors

    The  area  surrounding   this   site   is   generally   zoned
"Agricultural".   An  airport  with  scheduled service is located
approximately 2 miles  east.   The  site  area  itself  is  zoned
"Conservation  District",  and  the  existing  land use is mainly
residential.

    The visual impact of a plant at this site is considered to be
significant because of the residential character of the area.
                                  V-7

-------
    The population within a 3 mile  radius,   which  includes  the
city  of  Fort Dodge, is 32,000,  and that within a 10 mile radius
is 43,276.

    The effects of plant  construction  and  operation  on  water
quality  is  judged  to  be  significant  in  this area.   This is
because the main water course, the Des Moines River,   is  a  much
smaller  river  in terms of average flow than the Missouri River.
Consequently, the diluting capability is decreased.

    The area along the Des Moines River in the vicintiy  of  Fort
Dodge  has  a  floral  community  of  floodplain  forests.  These
forests provide suitable habitat for a majority  of  the  mammals
indigenous to the area.  In addition, these are the only forested
areas  for  a  significant  distance  in  any  direction.   It is,
therefore, judged that a  moderate  ecological  impact  would  be
experienced  if  a  generating  plant  were to be located at this
site.

    In addition, impacts on the aquatic and  terrestrial  ecology
are  to  be  expected  because Lizard Creek would be dammed and a
significant area benind the dam would  be  flooded^   This  would
affect   large   areas  of  forest,  which  provide  recreational
opportunities as well as habitat for animals  indigenous  to  the
area.
    2.   Boone River Site

         a.   Site Description

    This site is located approximately one mile south  of  Homer,
Iowa  and  straddles the line between Webster County and Hamilton
County.  The area is generally bounded on  the  east  by  Prairie
Creek  which provides water for a makeup water storage reservoir,
by Boone River on the south and by the Des Moines  River  on  the
west.

         b.   Engineering and Site Development Factors

    The land required for this site could be  as  much  as  1,110
acres,  which  is considerably greater than for most of the other
candidate sites.

    There  are  no  boring  logs  available  for  the   immediate
vicinity,  but  there  are  surface  tills underlain by St. Louis
limestone.  The limestone is only slightly permeable and  is  not
known to be cavernous.

    Rail  access  to this site requires construction of an 8 mile
long spur due north connecting with the Fort  Dodge,  Des  Moines
and  Southern  Railroad.   An  alternative would be to extend the
spur another 2 miles for connection to the Illinois Central  line
between  Fort  Dodge  and Webster City.  Although these distances
                                   V-8

-------
are considerable, they avoid the necessity of river crossings for
the spur.

    Light duty roads currently provide access to the site.   Some
improvement of the roads may be required.

    This site would require a pumping station on the west bank of
the  Des  Moines  River south of its confluence with Boone River.
This station would be designed to supply makeup water directly to
the cooling tower basins or to the reservoir on Prairie Creek.  A
second pumping station would be required at the  reservoir  which
would  supply  the  cooling towers during low flow periods on the
Des Moines River.

         c.   Environmental Factors

    The area around the site is mostly agricultural.   The  river
valley,  which is forested and used for recreational purposes, is
zoned "Conservation District".

    The population within a three mile  radius  of  the  site  is
sparse,  and  that  within  10 miles of the site is 10,662.  This
site was rated high for demographic considerations.

    The effects of plant construction and operation on area water
quality are judged to be significant because  of  the  relatively
low  flows  in  the  Des Moines River.  The diluting power of the
river is therefore limited.

    Makeup water for this site is drawn from the Des Moines River
when flows permit.  A storage reservoir is  required  to  provide
surge  water  to  carry plant operation over periods of low river
flow.  As previously discussed for the Lizard Creek site, the Des
Moines River  basin  is  composed  of  floodplain  forests.   The
forests provide a habitat for the mammals indigenous to the area.
The  formation  of the storage reservoir necessitates the removal
of a part of this forested area.

    The Des Moines River in this area is aquatically  productive.
Many  areas  along  the  river valley provide sport fishing.  The
impact of constructing and operating a plant at this  site  would
be significant.


    3.   Holiday Creek Site

         a.   Site Description

    The Holiday Creek site is located  approximately  four  miles
from  Fort Dodge, and approximately one mile from Coalville in an
area bounded by the Des Moines River on the west and  south.   It
was  determined  that  at  this  site  the  plant would utilize a
portion of the Holiday Creek basin  as  a  makeup  water  storage
reservoir.   It  was  further  determined  that  damming would be
                                   V-9

-------
necessary at a location 1,500 feet above the confluence with  the
Des Moines River, 9 miles downstream of the Fort Dodge gage.

         b.   Engineering and Site Development Factors

    This site requires an additional 250  acres  for  the  makeup
water  storage  reservoir.   The  land  requirement for the plant
island,  cooling  tower  area,   and   coal   storage   area   is
approximately 150 acres.

    The  boring  logs for the area indicate 45 to 55 feet of till
underlain by 5 to 14 feet of gypsum, which is underlain by shale.

    This site would require a 3 mile  rail  spur  from  the  Fort
Dodge, Des Moines and Southern Railroad line which would tie into
the  Illinois  Central  Railroad.   The site would also require a
medium duty highway bridge over Holiday CreeJc.

    As indicated above, the system includes reservoir storage for
the makeup water.  This would require a pumping  station  on  the
Des  Moines  River  at its nearest point to the reservoir.  Water
should be pumped to the reservoir from the Des  Moines  River  to
maintain  the reserve supply at maximum levels.  The makeup water
for the cooling tower system would be supplied directly from  the
Des  Moines  River when the flow is sufficient to permit pumping.
However, during low flow periods the makeup water would be  drawn
from the storage reservoir.

         c.   Environmental Factors

    The area around the site is  dedicated  to  agricultural  and
residential  use.  Coalville, a small community with a population
of about 250, is located one mile southwest, while  the  city  of
Fort  Dodge  is located four miles to the northwest.  A quarry is
located in the vicinity of the site.  Two rail lines run  through
the general area.  The site is zoned "Conservation District".

    The  population  within  a 3 mile radius of the site is 1,076
and that within a 10 mile radius is 34,871.  The major population
center is Fort Dodge with  approximately  32,000  persons.   This
site  was rated low for demographic considerations because of its
proximity to the Fort Dodge area.

    The effects of plant construction and operation on area water
quality are considered significant at this site  because  of  the
relatively  low flows in the Des Moines River which would be used
to dilute plant releases and runoffs.

    The impact of a plant in this area on terrestrial ecology  is
substantial.   This  is  caused  mainly by the damming of Holiday
Creek to provide a storage pond.  As  previously  discussed,  the
Des Moines River Valley contains forested areas for a significant
distance in either direction.  This area is used for recreational
purposes  and provides the only habitat for mammals indigenous to
                                  v-io

-------
the area.  Flooding a large area and  destroying  the  vegetation
within the area would alter the scenic and recreational values of
the land and reduce the amount of wildlife habitat.

    Aquatic   life   in   the  area  would  be  affected  by  the
construction of a plant at this site.  Damming of  Holiday  Creek
and creating a relatively stagnant pond with constant water level
fluctuations  would  tend to diminish the aquatic productivity of
the creek.  In addition, silt bearing  runoff  and  plant  liquid
releases  which  end  up  in  the  river  could  create potential
problems since the diluting potential of the river is  relatively
small.
    4.   Nashua Site

         a.   Site Description

    This site is located on the Cedar Fiver,  about  2 1/2  miles
southwest  of  Nashua,  Iowa  in Floyd County.  It was determined
that because of the low flows in the rivers adjacent to the  site
(Cedar, Little Cedar, Shell Rock),  the source of makeup water for
the cooling tower system would be groundwater.

         b.   Engineering and Site Development Factors

    The total land requirement  for  the  plant  island,  cooling
tower area and coal storage area is approximately 470 acres.

    Rail  access  to  the site would be provided by a 3 mile spur
connecting with the Illinois  Central  line  between  Nashua  and
Waverly.   Road  access would involve some improvements to a road
which intersects US Route 218 due east of the plant.

    As previously  stated,  groundwater  would  be  utilized  for
makeup  water  to  the  cooling towers.  Assuming an average well
capacity of 3,000 gpm, the site would require a total of 4  wells
or 12,000 gpm to supply makeup to the cooling tower system.

         c.   Environmental Factors

    The plant loacted at this site, within two miles  of  Nashua,
would be highly visible from both Nashua and Highway 128, a major
highway  in  the area.  In addition, the land use surrounding the
site is generally agricultural and residential.

    The "Little Brown Church in the Vale" is within two miles and
the "Carrie Land Chapman Catt Home" is within seven miles of  the
site.  Both o± these are historic sites.

    The  population  within  a 3 mile radius of the site is 1,742
and within ten miles is 13,814.
                                  v-ii

-------
    The effects of plant operation and construction on area water
quality are considered significant at this site  because  of  the
relatively low flows of the adjacent rivers.

    No  destruction  of  forested lands is involved at this site,
and, therefore, the impacts on terrestrial communities would  not
be significant.


    5.   Summary

    Based on an evaluation of  the  engineering/site  development
factors  and  environmental  factors  associated  with  the  five
candidate sites, the existing George Neal Steam Electric  Station
was  considered to be the most suitable site  for construction and
operation of Neal Unit 4 for the reasons outlined below:

    •    The proximity of the Missouri River  would provide  large
         quantities of water for plant operation.

    •    Analysis of the environmental impact of the once-through
         discharge of cooling water to the Missouri River,  based
         on  the aquatic monitoring data developed by Briar Cliff
         College  for  Units  1,  2,   and   3   indicated   that
         construction  and  operation  of  a   plant  at this site
         should not have a significant impact on aquatic biota in
         the river.

    •    The proposed unit would be  located   in  the  Port  Neal
         Industrial   District,   and,  therefore,  the  proposed
         activities would be compatible with  the present land use
         practices of the area.

    •    Unlike most of the other sites, the  Neal site is  not  a
         forested   area,   and,   consequently,  the  impact  on
         terrestrial communities would be less significant.

    •    The Neal site is about 14 miles from Sioux  City,  Iowa,
         the major population center in the area.

    •    A low sulfur coal-fired unit at this site could meet the
         National Ambient Air Quality  Standards  in  combination
         with the existing George Neal Station.

    •    The site would be in close proximity to the transmission
         facilities and  railroad  line  servicing  the  existing
         George Neal Steam Electric Station.
                                  V-12

-------
C.  PLANT DESIGN ALTERNATIVES

    1.   Cooling Water System

         a.   Introduction

    This section presents an evaluation of the condenser  cooling
water  systems  considered  as  viable  alternatives to the once-
through cooling water system proposed for Neal Unit 4.   The three
alternative systems discussed in this section are as follows:

         •    A closed-cycle cooling water system with a  natural
              draft cooling tower;

         •    A closed-cycle cooling water system  with  a  round
              mechanical draft cooling tower;

         •    A closed-cycle  water  system  with  a  rectangular
              mechanical draft cooling tower.

    Other  alternative  condenser  cooling water systems, such as
spray  ponds,   cooling  ponds  and  dry  cooling   systems   were
considered for this site but were eliminated because of economic,
environmental  impact  and/or  engineering  feasibility  factors.
More specifically, cooling ponds and spray ponds were  eliminated
from  consideration  because of the lack of available land at the
site.  Spray ponds were also considered  undesirable  because  of
the  lack  long-term operational experience with spray equipment.
Dry  cooling  systems  or  combination   wet/dry   systems   were
eliminated from consideration because of their excessive cost and
because these systems are required primarily in areas where there
is a lack of adequate water supply.

    A  discussion  of evaluation methods is presented in Appendix
A-V-C  which  dwells  primarily  on  the  methods  of  evaluating
environmental impact of cooling towers.  The environmental impact
evaluation  methods pertain to predictions of salt deposition and
fogging frequencies for cooling towers and the  establishment  of
terrestrial  ecology  impact criteria.  In addition, the criteria
used in performing the economic  analysis  for  eacn  alternative
cooling  water  system are presented.  The impact analysis of the
once-through system is discussed in detail in Chapter IV.

    The conceptual  designs  for  the  three  viable  alternative
condenser  cooling  systems are presented herein.  Based on these
conceptual  designs,  comparative  cost   estimates   have   been
developed  for each cooling water system in absolute terms and in
differential terms relative to the selected once-through  system.
An   evaluation  of  the  environmental  impact  on  aquatic  and
terrestrial ecology associated  with  each  alternative  is  also
presented.   These  analyses,  along  with  an  evaluation of the
aesthetic impact inherent in each system,  are  used  to  develop
comparisons  between  the  alternatives  and  the  selected once-
through cooling water system.
                                  V-13

-------
         b.   Natural Draft Cooling Tower

              i.   Engineering Description

    Exhibit V-C-1 presents a conceptual plot plan of Neal Unit  4
utilizing  a  closed-cycle  cooling  water  system with a natural
draft cooling tower.   Approximately  317,400  gpm  of  condenser
cooling  water  would be passed through the natural draft cooling
tower to remove  about  2.7 x 10®  Btu/hr  of  waste  heat.    The
temperature  rise across the condenser would be about 17°F during
plant operation at 100  percent  capacity  factor.   The  cooling
tower  would be designed for a wet bult temperature of 77°F and a
dry bulb temperature of 89°F.  Based on an approach to  wet  bulb
temperature of 18°F, the physical dimensions of the natural draft
cooling tower were determined to be as follows:

                   •    Base Diameter  370 feet
                   •    Overall Height 350 feet
                   •    Top Diameter   160 feet

    Three vertical  one-half  capacity  circulating  water  pumps
would be provided in a pump chamber attached to the cooling tower
basin.   During  normal  plant  operation,  two circulating water
pumps would be operating while the third  pump  would  act  as  a
standby.

    Makeup  water would be provided to the cooling tower by pumps
contained in vertical rotary drum screens located on  a  platform
constructed  along  the  bank of the Missouri River.  Four makeup
water pumps would be installed on the concrete  platform.   Three
pumps would provide makeup water to the cooling tower basin wnile
the  remaining  pump  would  act  as  a standby.  The rotary drum
screen assembly includes a vertical turbine pump operating with a
revolving  steel  casing  whose  lower  end  is  fitted  with   a
perforated  steel  plate  which  acts as the screening mechanism.
Water is drawn through the perforated plate by the  pump  and  is
piped to the cooling tower basin.  As the screen casing revolves,
high-pressure spray nozzles clean off any debro.s on the screening
surface on the downstream side.

    The  concrete  intake platform would be approximately 36 feet
wide and would extend out about 5 feet from  the  existing  river
bank.   Exhibit V-C-2 presents a schematic drawing of this makeup
water intake platform.  The structure would be supported  by  two
steel  H-piles  and  sheet  piling  along  the  river  bank.  The
structure would be enclosed on three sides by trashracks.

    The blowdown from the cooling tower basin would be discharged
directly to the Missouri  River.   The  blowdown  would  flow  by
gravity  through  a  concrete pipe that would extend out from the
river bank below the river surface.
                                  V-14

-------
              MAKEUP
              INTAKE
              PLATFORM
   envirosphere
     company
* DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                         IOWA PUBLIC  SERVICE Co.  -  NEAL UNIT  4
NATURAL DRAFT COOLING TOWER SYSTEM
 NEAL UNIT 4 CONCEPTUAL PLOT PLAN
                       DATE:
        SCALE:

        V-15
EXHIBIT
 V-C-1

-------
             MAKEUP  PIPE
     GRADE EL 1076
    SHEET PILE
                   I
            TREMIE'
             MAT
                                           ^ PUMP MOTOR

                                         ^   \	f
                                                        HANDRAIL
                     v~
                                  •^A
                         ROTATING
                         PERFORATED
                         PLATE SCREEN
                          k.         '          A  W  A

                        •"•*'V       i    I     ' /a'•«'•'•
                                SECTION
                                                         ^7
                                                                    MHW
                                                        TRASH RACK (ON 3 SIDES)
                                                                 EL 1055 MLW
                                    L
                                                              RIVER BED EL 10421
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                         IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. -  MEAL UNIT  4
          MAKEUP WATER INTAKE PLATFORM
DATE:
SCALE:

V-16
                                  EXHIBIT
                                    V-C-2

-------
              ii.  Environmental Impact

                   •    Effects on Aquatic Ecology

    Biological and ecological  effects  of  closed-cycle  cooling
incorporating   a  natural  draft  cooling  tower  would  not  be
significant.  Entrapment of juvenile  and  adult  fish  would  be
negligible,     and     fractional     amounts    of    plankton,
macroinvertebrates, and fish eggs and larvae would  be  entrained
in  the  makeup  water.   In  January, at low river flows of 8500
cubic feet per second  (cfs), approximately 0.24  percent  of  the
water  would  be required for makeup, whereas in August, when low
flows are in the range of 31,300 cfs, only 0.06  percent  of  the
river  water would be required.  During May, June, and July - the
months of  peak  fish  spawning  activity  -  approximately  0.07
percent of the Missouri River flow would be required for makeup.

    No  significant  ecological  effects  would  be expected as a
result of discharging cooling tower blowdown to the river.  Table
V-C-1 presents the average ambient water quality of the  Missouri
River at Neal Unit 4.  Even at five cycles of concentration and a
maximum  blowdown  rate  of  5 cfs, effects on the Missouri River
would be negligible due to the rapid mixing of the effluent.  For
example, the total dissolved solids  (IDS) level would  be  within
the  allowable  limits  within  a  short distance of the point of
discharge.  Table V-C-2 presents  the  monthly  average  blowdown
temperatures  from  the  natural draft cooling tower.  As stated,
because of the rapid dilution of the effluent, thermal effects on
river biota should be insignificant.

                   •    Effects on Terrestrial Ecology

    Salt deposition rates  for  a  natural  draft  cooling  tower
located  at  Neal  Unit  4 are presented in Table V-C-3.  Exhibit
A-V-C-1 presents the distribution of these rates and location  of
potentially  affected vegetation types.  Spring season rates were
considered more critical than those  of  other  seasons  as  some
plants,  such as soybeans, are more sensitive to the chloride ion
during the early growth stages.  Also, it  has  been  noted  that
seedlings  obtain  water  from  the  upper  soil  surface,  where
temporary maximum salt concentrations can  occur  before  soluble
materials are transported by leaching and erosion.1

    Lack  of  information  on  plant injury resulting from aerial
deposition of sulfate  salts  precludes  accurate  prediction  of
effects  of  cooling towers on vegetation at Neal Unit 4.  It may
be assumed, however, that the sulfate ion is no more  toxic  than
chloride:  in general, sensitive plants are only affected by high
concentration  of  the  former2,  whereas  species   particularly
sensitive  to  chloride  such  as tobacco and fruits are known to
respond to relatively low chloride concentrations.* Incorporating
this assumption of  equivalent  toxicities  and  an  estimate  of
cooling  tower  salt  composition  of  75  percent  sulfate  into
criteria for calculating a salt deposition rate  which  will  not
                                  V-17

-------


















{
envir
con
A DIVISION OF EBASC

Description
pH (unit)
Total alkalinity
Total hardness
Ca++
.Mg++
Na++
K+
HCCT,
co3
Cl
S04=
NH^N
NO^N
Total Phosphate
Silica
IDS
Total Suspended Solids
BODS
Concentration
8.1
(mg/l asCaCO}) 170
(mg/1 asCaCO}) -50



(mg/l asCaCO}) 155 j
(mg/1 asCaCO^) c'5
(mg/l asCaCO3) 37
(mg/l asCaCO}) 7
(mg/l asCaCO^) 170
(mg/l as CaC'O^) 0
(mg/l as CaCO}) Id
(mg/l asCaCO,) 208
(ing. 1 as N) 0.25
(mg'l as N) 0.30
(mg/l asP) 0.21
(mg/l as SiO-,) ().7
(mg/l) 480.
(mg/l) 150.
(mg/l) 2.1)

B IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
AVERAGE WATER QUALITY OF THE MISSOURI TABLE
osphere RIVER IN THE VICINITY OF NEAL UNIT 4 v-c-1
npany
•o SERVICES INCORPORATED DATE: SCALE:















V-18

-------
Month
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
Auiui^t
September
October
November
December
Temperature (F)
55
58
64
72
74
85
87
88
82
75
65
54
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF E8ASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED)
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
MONTHLY AVERAGE SLOWDOWN TEMPERATURE
NATURAL DRAFT COOLING TOWER
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
V-C-2
V-19

-------
Distance
From
lower
(ft)

5UU
1.000
1.500
:.uou
3. 000
4.000
5.1)00
10.000



Direction from Tower
S
53 0
13.0
4.:
4.5
4.0
: (,
\M
!.0
s\v
40.0
7.7
J.S
3.1
\v
<>0.0
7.7
3.8
4.1
:.^ , 3.7
1.7 • :.:
i :
1.0
I.X
1.0
\\\
207.U
18.0
S 8
N
40.0
^.7
4,h
M
15.0
().S)
3.1
c>..: 5.0 3.2
8.5 4. s> :.7
5>»
4.4
"> T
3.5
i 7
"" '
l.i
1.5
1.1
1.0
i.
17.0
7.:
3.1
3.2
2.5
1.3
1.0
1.0
SI
1 1'J.O
3:.o
S.I
8."
~" •>
5.4
4.0
1 X
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - MEAL UNIT 4
NATURAL DRAFT COOLING TOWER
ANNUAL SALT DEPOSITION, LBS ACRE YEAR
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
V-C-3
V-20

-------
affect  terrestrial  biota,  a  rate  is  arrived  at  of  1.6 Ib
salt/acre/month.  Inspection of Exhibit  A-V-C-1  indicates  that
only a small portion (50 acres) of riparian shrub land is exposed
to  salt  deposition  greater  than 1.6 Ib/acre/month, indicating
that natural draft  cooling  towers  are  not  likely  to  affect
vegetation in the area of Neal Unit H through aerial impaction of
salt crystals on leaf blades.

    Chloride  ion would comprise only two to three percent of the
cooling tower salts  (based  on  preliminary  calculations),  and
would  not  be  deposited  to any significant degree at the rates
shown in Exhibit A-V-C-2.  A natural draft cooling tower  maximum
chloride deposition of 0.1 Ib chloride/acre/month is considerably
smaller  than  amounts  added  to the soil through precipitation,
which have been shown to range in the United States from  0.8  to
over 8.0 Ib chloride/acre/month.3

    Operation  of  a  natural  draft  cooling  tower would not be
expected  to  significantly  alter  salinity  of  nearby   soils.
Deposition  of sulfur by natural precipitation can range up to 17
Ibs/acre/month, with no deleterious effects.*

              iii. Aesthetic Impact

    The natural draft cooling tower system will have  a  definite
aesthetic  impact  on  the  surrounding environment.  The cooling
tower, along with the Unit U stack, would be  visible  for  miles
from  any  direction.  In addition to the physical height of both
structures, their associated vapor plumes would be visible during
certain periods of the year.  The visual impact  of  the  natural
draft  cooling  tower  would  be  greater  than that of the stack
because of the opacity of the plume  and  width  of  the  cooling
tower.   The  diameter  of  the natural draft cooling tower would
vary from 160 feet at the top to a maximum diameter of  370  feet
at the tower base.

              iv.  Investment Cost

    The investment cost for the  closed-cycle  condenser  cooling
water  system  with  a  natural  draft  cooling  tower  has  been
developed based on the evaluation method  discussed  in  Appendix
A-V-C.   The  estimate for the natural draft cooling tower system
includes the cost of the concrete cooling  tower,  cooling  tower
basin,  makeup  water  intake platform, pumps, piping, valves and
electrical equipment.  The initial capital  investment  cost  was
estimated  at  $14,500,000  for  the  base  year 1977.  The total
investment costs including operating, fuel and maintenance  costs
are presented below:
                                   V-21

-------
                                                 ABSOLUTE COST

                   •    Total Generating Cost     $35,465,000
                        (Present worth value)

                   •    Total Generating Cost     $ 2,858,000
                        (Annual ized)

         c.   Round Mechanical Draft Cooling Tower System

              i.   Engineering Description

    Exhibit V-C-3 presents a conceptual plot plan of Neal Unit  4
utilizing  a  closed-cycle  cooling  water  system  with  a round
mechanical draft cooling tower.   Approximately  317,400  gpm  of
condenser  cooling  water  would be passed through the mechanical
draft cooling tower to remove about  2.7 x 10*  Btu/hr  of  waste
heat.   The  temperature rise across the condenser would be about
17 F during plant operation at 100 percent capacity factor.   The
cooling  tower  would  be  designed for a wet bulb temperature of
77 F and a dry bulb temperature of 89 F.  Based on an approach to
wet bulb temperature of 18 F,  the  physical  dimensions  of  the
round  mechanical  draft  cooling  tower were determined to be as
follows:

                   •    Number of Cells      12
                   •    Overall Diameter    315 feet
                   •    Overall Height       62 feet

    Three vertical  one-half  capacity  circulating  water  pumps
would be provided in a pump chamber attached to the cooling tower
basin.   During  normal  plant  operation,  two circulating pumps
would be operating while the third pump would act as a standby.

    Makeup water would be provided to the cooling tower by  pumps
contained  in  vertical rotary drum screens located on a platform
constructed along the bank of the  Missouri  River.   As  in  the
previous  case  with the natural draft cooling tower, four makeup
water pumps would be installed on the concrete  intake  platform.
Three pumps would provide makeup water to the cooling tower basin
while the remaining pump would act as a standby.  The description
of the makeup water intake platform and the screened pumps is the
same  as  that  presented in the previous section for the natural
draft cooling tower system.

    The blowdown from the cooling tower basin would be discharged
directly to the Missouri  River  as  discussed  in  the  previous
section.
                                  V-22

-------













Month
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Temperature (F)
73
74
77
81
85
89
91
91
87
83
78
75
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED'
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
MONTHLY AVERAGE SLOWDOWN TEMPERATURE
MECHANICAL DRAFT COOLING TOWER
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
V-C-4
V-25

-------
Distance
From
Tower
(ft)

500
i .000
1.500
2.000
.1.000
4.000
5.000
10.000



Direction from Tower
S
505.0
108.0
69.0
::.o
22.0
13.0
13.0
1.0
sw
385.0
68. 0
46.0
1S.O
15.0
~ i
12
1.0
w
542.0
03.0
55.0
20.0
20.0
9.0
9.0
0.0
NW
1857.0
151.0
104.0
54,0
54.0
31.0
31.0
1.0
N
390.0
93.0
75.0
36.0
35.0
24.0
24.0
1.0
NI:
138.0
56 0
54.0
15.0
14.0
6.4
6.4
1.0
h
279.0
87,0
81.0
19.0
18.0
7.0
7,0
1.0
si:
i 197.0
2X2.0
1 16.0
49,0
48.0
32.0
32.0
1.0
o
envirosphere
company
A DIVISION OF E8ASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
ROUND MECHANICAL DRAFT COOLING TOWER
ANNUAL SALT DEPOSITION, LBS/ACRE /YEAR
DATE: SCALE:
TABLE
V-C-5
V-26

-------
                           S»*M
                              &;&"-fa?-:-
Effi
                I



              .
                en

                Cfi
                                                £'4'<*'
                                                          m
                                             3 >; O O D O O O O O O
                                                           m


                                   1 oc:-'i.

                                        fe^^ss=M^>:t-N^-:Vv/;r:/;•'•:: •;•'.:.'• \\JSZ ••:'"'-X:;i
                                     tv~r-.-o o^3,
                                                     ??^^go^gs2^^SS^
                                                    ;^^5^K^^«^^
                                                        y c
                                                           \> A-j.J;/a'
LEGEMD

     Surface
                                     •oo-ooo'
                                                    • o'A
     Soil pH


Surface Soil pH
Range: 6.


Range 7
                      6 - 7.
                      4-84

                                                                      -Oo0ojo0o^0^
                                                                    	j>Vo0o0o-.
                                                    p;o:c:o;;o:o:o:o:;o; 3:y,-o-o;o-:o:3^o°o°o3^o°o°o^o°o^
                                                                   ':o-o;o-o:3;oro;ro-<
                                                                   ^.,,^o2<
                                                                       ' o o..o a oil
       o
   envlrosphere
     company
4 DIVISION OF [BASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                        IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE  Co. - NEAL UNIT  4
                               RANGLS 0!- SURFACE: SOILS IM
                                     UNiT d  AREA
                      DATE:
                               SCALE:

                               V-27
                                                                  EXHIBIT
                                                                   V-C-4

-------
quantity of sulfate that  plants  can  tolerate,   when  the  salt
particles  accumulate  on  leaf  surfaces  in this manner,  is not
known.

    Table  V-C-6  lists  woody  plants  which  are  known  to  be
sensitive  to sodium chloride spray.  Smooth sumac and greenbriar
are  important  shrub  and   vine   components   of   terrestrial
communities in the Missouri River floodplain.

    As  discussed  in  Appendix  A-V-C, chloride  deposition rates
less than 1.2 Ib/acre/month are not expected to injure  the  most
chloride  sensitive plants (tobacco and some fruits).   Since only
approximately 2 1/2 percent of Neal Unit 4 cooling tower salt  is
chloride,  this  rate  translates  into a salt deposition rate at
Neal Unit 4 of 48 Ib/acre/month.  Only vegetation growing  within
the boundaries of Neal Unit 4 and near the cooling tower would be
exposed to potentially injurious quantities of this ion.

    The  soil  salinities of farmlands in the area of  Neal Unit 4
would not be expected to change  due  to  operation of  a  round
mechanical   draft   cooling  tower;  with  sufficient  drainage,
deposited salts would be leached  into  the  groundwater  system.
Poorly  drained  nonagricultural areas, however,  could experience
small changes in sulfur concentrations.

              iii. Aesthetic Impact

    The aesthetic impact of the round  mechanical  draft  cooling
tower   system  on  the  surrounding  environment  would  not  be
significant.  The overall height of the cooling tower  would be 62
feet and, while the cooling tower would be visible from both  the
river  and  a  portion  of  the  site  property  line,  the major
aesthetic impacts would be incurred by the plant  island, the Neal
Unit 4 stack and, the coal handling facilities.  However,  during
periods of the year, a high altitude vapor plume  would be visible
from the round mechanical draft cooling tower.

              iv.  Investment Cost

    The investment cost for the  closed-cycle  condenser  cooling
water system with a round mechanical draft cooling tower has been
developed  based  on  the evaluation method discussed  in Appendix
A-V-C.  The estimate for the round mechanical draft cooling tower
system includes the cost of the concrete cooling   tower,  cooling
tower  basin, makeup water intake platform, pumps, piping, valves
and electrical equipment.  The intital  capital  investment  cost
was  estimated  at  $9,400,000 for the base year 1977.  The total
investment costs including operating, fuel and maintenance  costs
are presented below:
                                  V-28

-------
             Blackjack oak

             Spanish oak

             Red maple

             Honey locust

             Wild black cherry

             Apple

             Flowering dogwood

             Sassafras

             Red bud

             Pepper bush

             Hawthorn

             Smooth sumac

             Vireinia creeper

             Greenbriar
                          (Quercus marilandica)

                          (Quercus palustris)

                          (Acer rubra)

                          (Gleditsia tricanthos)

                          (Prunus serotina)

                          (Malus  spp.)

                          (Cornus florida)

                          (Sassafras spp.)

                          (Cercis  canadensis)

                          (Clethra alnifolia)

                          (Crataegus spp.)

                          (Rhus glabra)

                          (Parthenocissus quinquefolia)

                          (Smilax spp.)
   envirosphere
      company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                          IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - NEAL UNIT 4
         WOODY PLANTS SENSITIVE  TO
        SODIUM CHLORIDE SALT SPRAY
DATE:
SCALE:

V-29
                                        TABLE
                                          V-C-6

-------
                                                 ABSOLUTE COST

                   •    Total Generating Cost     $27,635,000
                        (Present worth value)

                   •    Total Generating Cost     $ 2,227,000
                        (Annualized)

         d.    Rectangular Mechanical Draft Cooling Tower System

              i.   Engineering Description

    Exhibit  V-C-5 presents a conceptual plot plan of Neal Unit  4
utilizing  a closed-cycle cooling water system with a rectangular
mechanical draft cooling tower.   Approximately  317,400  gpm  of
condenser  cooling  water  would be passed through the mechanical
draft cooling tower to remove about  2.7 x 109' Btu/hr  of  waste
heat.   The  temperature rise across the condenser would be about
17°F during plant operation at 100 percent capacity factor.   The
cooling  tower  would  be  designed for a wet bulb temperature of
77°F and a dry bulb temperature of 89°F.  Based on an approach to
a wet bulb temperature of 18°F, the physical  dimensions  of  the
rectangular  mechanical draft cooling tower were determined to be
as follows:

                        *    Number of Cells      12
                        •    Overall Width        70 feet
                        •    Overall Length      480 feet
                        •    Overall Height       60 feet

    Three vertical  one-half  capacity  circulating  water  pumps
would be provided in a pump chamber attached to the cooling tower
basin.   During  normal  plant  operation,  two circulating water
pumps would be operating while the third  pump  would  act  as  a
standby.

    Makeup  water would be provided to the cooling tower by pumps
contained in vertical rotary drum screens located on  a  platform
constructed  along  the  bank  of  the Missouri River.  As in the
previous cases with the natural draft and round mechanical  draft
cooling  tower  systems,  four makeup pumps would be installed on
the concrete intake platform.  Three pumps would  provide  makeup
water  to  the cooling tower basin while the remaining pump would
act as a standby.  The description of  the  makeup  water  intake
platform  and the screened pumps is the same as that presented in
the section for the natural draft cooling tower system.

    The blowdown from the cooling tower basin would be discharged
directly to the Missouri River as  discussed  previously  in  the
section on the natural draft cooling tower.
                                  V-30

-------
              MAKEUP
              INTAKE
              PLATFORM
       e
   envirosphere
     company
A DIVISION OF EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
 IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE Co. - IMEAL UNIT 4
      RECTANGULAR MECHANICAL DRAFT
         COOLING TOWER NEAL UNIT 4
          CONCEPTUAL PLOT PLAN
DATE:
SCALE:

V-31
                                EXHIBIT
                                 V-C-5

-------
              ii.   Environmental Impact

                   •    Effects on Aquatic Ecology

    No significant ecological effects  would  be  expected  as  a
result  of  discharging  cooling  tower  blowdown to the river as
discussed in the section  on  the  natural  draft  cooling  tower
system.   As  indicated,  even at 5 cycles of concentration and a
maximum blowdown rate of 5 cfs, effects  on  the  Missouri  River
would  be  negligible  due  to  the rapid mixing of the effluent.
Table V-C-4 presents the monthly  average  blowdown  temperatures
from  the  mechanical draft cooling tower.  As previously stated,
because of  the  rapid  dilution  of  the  effluent,  temperature
effects on river biota would be insignificant.

                   •    Effects on Terrestrial Ecology

    Salt deposition rates were  not  calculated  for  rectangular
mechanical  draft  cooling towers at Neal Unit 4 because reliable
estimates could be made from those  deposition  rates  calculated
for  round  mechanical  draft cooling towers.  Although the total
salt emission would be the same  as  that  for  round  mechanical
draft   cooling  towers,  deposition  rates  would  range  up  to
approximately four times higher due to a lower plume rise  and  a
corresponding decrease in deposition area.

    Salt    deposition    rates    would    likely   exceed   the
1.6 Ib/acre/month criteria developed previously.  Nearby riparian
shrub type of vegetation, which serves as  a  productive  habitat
for  deer, pheasant and waterfowl, would have a greater potential
for injury.  The fourfold increase in concentrations of deposited
sulfate ions may be a source of more concern to  this  productive
riparian community.

    Because  salt  deposition from a rectangular mechanical draft
cooling tower is concentrated in an area near the  tower  itself,
deleterious  effects  on  agricultural  crops  and  soils are not
expected.

              iii. Aesthetic Impact

    The aesthetic impact  of  the  rectangular  mechanical  draft
cooling  tower system on the surrounding environment would not be
significant.  The overall height of the cooling tower would be 60
feet and, while the cooling tower would be visible from both  the
river  and  a  portion  of  the  site  property  line,  the major
aesthetic impact would be due to the plant island, the Neal  Unit
i*  stack  and  the  coal  handling  facilities.   However, during
periods of the year, a low altitude vapor plume would be  visible
from the rectangular mechanical draft cooling tower.
                                   V-32

-------
              iv.  Investment Cost

    The investment cost for the  closed-cycle  condenser  cooling
water  system  with  a rectangular mechanical draft cooling tower
has been developed based on the evaluation  method  discussed  in
Appendix  A-V-C.   The  estimate  for  the rectangular mechanical
draft cooling tower system includes  the  cost  of  the  concrete
cooling tower, cooling tower basin, makeup water intake platform,
pumps,  piping,  valves  and  electrical  equipment.  The initial
capital investment cost was estimated at $9,700,000 for the  base
year  1977.  The total investment costs including operating, fuel
and maintenance costs are presented below:

                                                 ABSOLUTE COST

                   •    Total Generating Cost     $28,258,000
                        (Present worth value)

                   •    Total Generating Cost     $ 2,299,000
                        (Annualized)

         e.   Comparison of Systems

              i.   Environmental Impact Comparison

    The evaluation of the environmental impact of the alternative
condenser cooling water systems on the  aquatic  and  terrestrial
ecology  indicates  that  none  of the alternatives should have a
significant adverse impact on the environment.  The  once-through
cooling  water  system,  discussed  in Chapter IV, would have its
greatest, although not necessarily  significant,  impact  on  the
aquatic  ecology,  while  the  closed-cycle cooling tower systems
would impact greatest on the terrestrial communities.

    In most cases, the impact of the cooling water system on  the
environment  would  be  minimal.  However, there is a possibility
that  salt  deposition  from  the  rectangular  mechanical  draft
cooling  tower might expose portions of the riparian shrub in the
Snyder   Bend   recreational   area   to    possibly    injurious
concentrations  of chlorides.  In addition, the consumptive water
use for the closed-cycle cooling tower  systems  would  be  about
7200  acre-feet per year (ac-ft/yr) while the once-through system
would have negligible consumptive water use   (20  acre  feet,  per
year).   The  aesthetic  impact  inherent  in  each cooling water
system has also been discussed and the impact shown to be minimal
in all cases except for the natural draft cooling tower system.

              ii.  Engineering Cost Comparison

    The evaluation of the engineering  costs  for  the  condenser
cooling  water  systems  is  based  on  the total generating cost
(present worth) associated with each  system.    As  discussed  in
Appendix  A-V-C,  the cost estimate prepared for each alternative
system were based on conceptual  system  designs  developed  from
                                   V-33

-------
preliminary plot plans and plant operating characteristics and do
not include the cost of the condenser.  The total generating cost
(present  worth)   for  the  once-through cooling water system was
lower than that for the closed-cycle cooling tower systems by the
amounts shown below:

                                                 Differential Cost
                   System                        (base year 1977)

         «    Once-Through System
         •    Round Mechanical Draft Cooling     $ 4,219,000
         •    Rectangular Mechanical Draft
                Cooling Tower                    $ 5,112,000
         •    Natural Draft Cooling Tower        $12,049,000

    It should be noted that the  once-through  circulating  water
system  intake  structure  presented  in Chapter II is a modified
version of the intake structure evaluated in the engineering cost
analysis.   Subsequent  modifications  to  the  original   intake
structure  have  been  made  to  further reduce the environmental
impact of the structure on the  aquatic  ecology.   These  design
modifications  do  not  significantly affect the total generating
cost developed for the once-through cooling water system.

              iii. Conclusions

    The once-through cooling water system has been chosen as  the
primary  alternative  for  Neal  Unit  4  based  on  analysis  of
environmental impact, aesthetics and engineering cost.  The once-
through system will have a minimal impact on the aquatic ecology,
no  impact  on  terrestrial   communities   and   will   minimize
consumptive water loss.  The aesthetic impact of the once-through
cooling  system  will  be  negligible.   In  addition,  the total
generating cost (present worth) of the  once-through  system  was
lower  than  that  for  the  closed-cycle  cooling tower systems.
Consequently, the applicant considered the once-through system to
be the preferred condenser cooling water system for Neal Unit 4.


    2.   Intake Structure

    Power plant intakes have traditionally been  designed  solely
on  the basis of satisfactory engineering design at minimum cost.
However, with current attention  directed  toward  the  potential
environmental effects of intake systems, these structures must be
designed  to  minimize  their environmental impact, while keeping
the cost factors in proper perspective.  In light  of  this,  the
EPA issued the "Development Document for Proposed Best Technology
Available  for Minimizing Adverse Environmental Impact of Cooling
Water Intake  Structures"   (December,  1973)  followed  by  final
intake  structure  design  guidelines  as set forth in 40 CFR 402
 (April,  1976) .
                                   V-34

-------
    The following alternative intake systems were considered  for
use at Neal Unit 4:

         a.   Lagoon System

    This  alternative  would  involve  the  construction  of   an
offstream  lagoon  at  the  plant  site.   Offstream  systems are
discussed in the aforementioned EPA Development Document and  are
considered  to  be  conducive  to  increased  incidence  of  fish
entrapment.  This is the result of the attraction of fish to  the
still  waters  of  the  lagoon.   A modified approach would be to
install screens flush with the river bank at  the  inlet  to  the
lagoon; however, this would entail increased operational problems
to  maintain  both  the  screens  at the intake structure and the
additional screens at the river bank.  Consequently,  the  lagoon
alternative was rejected for use at Neal Unit 4.

         b.   Groundwater Intake

    This alternative would involve the construction of  a  system
of wells or Ranney collectors to provide the 317,400 gpm required
for  the once-through condenser cooling water system at the plant
site.   Because  of  the  amount  of  land   required   for   the
installation  of  a sufficient capacity well/collector system and
the reluctance  to  utilize  a  limited  groundwater  supply  for
condenser  cooling water when there is a large flow available for
such purposes in the Missouri River, the alternative was rejected
for use at Neal Unit 4.

         c.   Slotted Pipe Intake

    This alternative would involve the  construction  of  slotted
collecting  pipes  along  the river bottom.  Water would be drawn
through these pipes to a concrete caisson and then passed through
the Neal Unit 4 condenser.   Because  of  the  quantity  of  flow
required  for  the  once-through  cooling  water  system  and the
necessity of designing a system that  would  not  interfere  with
navigation on the Missouri River, a series of these slotted pipes
would  be  required  along the river bottom.  However, because of
the continuous shitting of river bottom elevation resulting  from
normal sediment transport and the potential future degradation of
the  Missouri  River bottom due to the effects of channelization,
this alternative was rejected for use at Neal Unit 4.

         d.   Shoreline Intake

    This  alternative  would  involve  the  construction   of   a
conventional  shoreline  intake  along  the  bank of the Missouri
River.  This alternative was selected for use at the Neal Unit  4
site.

    A   design  study  for  a  suitable  intake  system  included
selection of intake approach velocity to the  traveling  screens,
design and location of the intake structure, trashrack design and
                                  V-35

-------
selection  of  the  traveling screens.  for example, the approach
velocity to the traveling screens should be as low as practicable
to reduce fish impingement upon the screens  and  allow  fish  to
swim  away  from  the  intake area.  A balance had to be achieved
between increased cost due to a larger intake required for  lower
velocities,  and  reduced  fish  entrapment.  Recent studies have
shown that intake approach velocities should be in the  range  of
0.5 fps to minimize injury to aquatic life.

    In  line  with  the  above,  the following criteria have been
developed for the design of the Neal Unit 4 intake structure:

              i.   Intake Velocities

    The velocity through the  traveling  screens  will  be  about
0.7 fps  with  an  approach  velocity of about 0.3 fps during the
navigation season.  This season extends from  about  April  1  to
December 1.

              li.  Sand Weir

    A vertical sand weir will be employed instead of one that  is
inclined  along the trashracks (Units 1-3)  in an effort to reduce
crayfish entrapment.

              iii. Screen Wash System

    The screen wash system will consist of  both  high  and  low-
pressure  sprays.  The low-pressure sprays will be used to remove
any fish that may impinge on the screens to a trough  where  they
will  be  sluiced back to the river at a point located downstream
of the intake structure.  High-pressure sprays will  be  used  to
remove  trash  from  the  screens to a separate debris trough for
disposal back to the river.

    A detailed description of the intake system is  presented  in
Chapter II.


    3.   Chemical Waste Treatment System

    The following waste streams  will  require  treatment  before
discharge  to  be  in compliance with the EPA Effluent Guidelines
and Standards: boiler blowdown, demineralizer regenerants, filter
backwash, floor drains and powdex wastes.

    At Neal 4 chemical waste streams will be collected in various
flow equalization basins.  Waste water will be diverted from  the
basins  through  final treatment processes before discharge.  The
following treatment systems are capable  of  producing  effluents
meeting the applicable regulations:
                                   V-36

-------
                        Evaporation
                        Ultrafiltration
                        Plain Sedimentation
                        Flocculation-Clarification
                        Sand Filtration

    A  description and evaluation of each alternative waste water
treatment system follows.

         a.   Evaporation

    This  treatment  alternative   will   produce   an   effluent
essentially  free  of  dissolved  solids.   The effluent would be
suitable for reuse in the  boiler  makeup  water  supply  system.
Approximately  5-10 percent of the waste water stream, containing
all the dissolved and suspended solids from the waste water,  may
require further treatment before disposal.

    Evaporation  systems  require large capital and operation and
maintenance expenses, and impose a large  power  penalty  on  the
generating station.

         b.   Ultrafiltration

    Ultrafiltration employs membrane filters for the  removal  of
suspended  solids.  Ultrafiltration systems operate at relatively
low  pressures,  50  to  100 psig  and  produce  a   concentrated
suspension of suspended solids for disposal.

         c.   Plain Sedimentation

    Plain  sedimentation  is  sufficient  to  effectively  remove
suspended  solids  from non-dissolved metal content wastes.  This
system is inexpensive in  terms  of  capital  and  operation  and
maintenance costs.

         d.   Flocculation-Clarification

    A flocculation-clarification  system  precipitates  dissolved
heavy  metals  and  fine colloidal suspended solids by entrapment
and sedimentation.  To accomplish this a flocculating agent, lime
and/or an organic polymer, is added and the waste water is slowly
mixed to induce floe formation.  The floes formed are removed  by
s edimentation.

         e.   Sand Filtration

    Sand filtration is a well developed technology  with  gravity
and  pressure  filters  in  common use.  For effective filtration
close control of the hydraulic loading rate is  necessary.   Sand
filters are well adapted for use where the TSS concentrations are
relatively  low, as high levels of TSS makes frequent backwashing
necessary.
                                  V-37

-------
         f.   Comparison of Alternatives.

    Based on the above, a flocculation-clarification  system  and
plain  sedimentation  system  were selected for use at the Neal 4
Station to treat heavy metal  content  wastes  and  non-dissolved
metal content waste streams, respectively.


    4.   Sanitary Wastewater Treatment

    For Neal Unit <*, the following sanitary wastewater  treatment
systems were considered:

              •    Discharge to a municipal treatment system
              •    Extended aeration activated sludge treatment
              •    Physicochemical treatment

The   following   is   a  brief  description  of  eacn  treatment
alternative:

         a.   Discharge to a Municipal Treatment System

    This alternative is not viable at the Neal 4 site as its  use
would  require  the  installation  of  a  12  mile pipeline and a
pumping station to reach the Sioux City, Iowa treatment plant.

         b.   Extended Aeration Activated Sludge Treatment

    The extended aeration activated sludge process is an  aerobic
biological  treatment  system.  It is ideally suited for use with
discharge of raw wastewater because of its  consistent  treatment
efficiency   and  low  excess  sludge  production.   This  system
incorporates an aeration basin where raw wastewater is  put  into
contact   with   aerobic   microorganisms.    The  microorganisms
metabolize much of the dissolved and  suspended  organic  solids.
After  sedimentation,  the  effluent  would  be  discharged  to a
leaching field.

         c.   Physicochemical Treatment

    Physicochemical treatment of sanitary wastes  uses  the  unit
processes  of  flocculation-clarification,  for  suspended solids
removal, and carbon adsorption for removal of dissolved organics.
This treatment system is overly expensive when applied  to  small
systems,  as  the  cost of chemicals, chemical feed equipment and
operation and maintenance costs would te high.

         d.   Comparison of Alternatives

    Based on the above, the extended  aeration  activated  sludge
system  is  the  most  viable  alternative for both technical and
environmental reasons.  The use of a leaching field  will  result
in no discharge of sanitary wastes to the Missouri River.
                                  V-38

-------
5.   Li9ui
-------
         b.   Auxiliary Cooling Water Discharge

    The possibility of redirecting the cooling  water  discharged
from  the  auxiliary  heat exchangers and coolers to Browns'  Lake
State Park is under consideration at  the  request  of  the  Iowa
State   Conservation   Commission.    The   total   discharge  of
approximately 6,800 gpm would be used to maintain  the  level  of
the  lake.   An  alternate  discharge  line  would be provided to
divert the cooling water to the seal well when high water  levels
occur  in  Browns  Lake.   Should  this alternative in the future
prove  beneficial  to  the  management  of  the  park   then    an
application  for  the necessary discharge permit would be made at
that time.

    The most recent information regarding the project is included
in the Environmental Assessment for the Brown's Lake  Restoration
Project prepared by Iowa State Conservation Commission in 1976.

    The   following   impacts   which   may   result   from   the
implementation of the project will require further study prior to
issuance of a NPDES permit for the discharge to Brown's Lake.

    •    Construction activities will involve increases  in  fuel
consumption,  noise  levels,  fugitive  dust, and smoke.  Various
degrees of both soil erosion and compaction will occur.   Minimal
impacts  to  local  traffic should result.  Temporary disturbance
and displacement of wildlife can be expected.  Vegetation in   the
"dry"  marsh  area will be destroyed at and near the construction
site.

    •    The proposed  increased  water  level  in  Brown's  Lake
should  increase  the  water  surface  area from about 200 to 580
acres.  This level will conform closely  to  the  "ordinary  high
water  mark"  of the lake.  The "dry" marsh area, therefore,  will
become "wet" marsh, which should result in more intensive use  by
certain  wildlife  species.   However,  other animals, especially
upland species requiring nesting cover, will lose their  habitat,
resulting in local losses in their populations.

    Inundation  will affect the amount of tree cover in marsh and
transition areas.  Continuous flow of  water  through  the  ditch
will  alter  the  types  of  vegetation  in  the low-lying areas.
However, operation of the ditch should not impose constraints  on
existing land use.

    •    Thermal pollution to the lake as a result of discharging
cooling water may affect certain species of aquatic  biota.   The
timing  and  quantity  of  water released to Brown1s Lake will be
controlled to minimize any adverse environmental impact.

    •    Sedimentation  resulting  from  the  existing  suspended
materials  to  be  introduced  to the lake by discharging cooling
water may affect the water quality of the lake.  Deposits of sand
and silt in Brown's Lake will  occur,  however,  the  timing  and
                               V-AO

-------
quantity  of  water  released  to  the lake will be controlled to
minimize any adverse environmental impact.

    •    Operational impacts to be incurred by the  lake  include
minor  increases  in fuel consumption and air and water pollution
resulting  from  flat-water  sports,  especially  motor  boating.
Traffic  congestion,  possible  trespass  by potential users, and
soil compaction and erosion may occur as a  result  of  intensive
usage.  Increases in solid waste production will result.

         c.   Coal Pile Runoff

    Coal pile runoff will be treated  as  required  to  meet  New
Source Performance Standards  (NSPS) effluent limitations and then
directed  to the Missouri River.  As in the case of the condenser
cooling water, should an application be made in the future for  a
permit  to  discharge  water into Snyder Bend, then the potential
inclusion of treated coal pile runoff in that discharge would  be
evaluated at that time.
    6.   Air Quality Control System

         a.    Introduction

    For a coal-fired electric generating station,  such  as  Neal
Unit  4,  air quality control techniques are applied to limit the
emission of polluting combustion products  into  the  atmosphere,
and  to  utilize  the potential of the atmosphere to dilute those
air pollutants that are  emitted.   The  effectiveness  of  these
techniques  can be measured, respectively, in terms of compliance
with the Federal New Stationary Source Performance  Standard  (40
Code  of  Federal  Regulations  60)  and the National Ambient Air
Quality standards  (40  Code  of  Federal  Regulations  50).   An
evaluation  is  made  in  this  section  of  the applicability of
various techniques to remove  sulfur  dioxide  (SO2),  oxides  of
nitrogen (NOx) and suspended particulate matter from the flue gas
and  of  the suitability of a major boiler stack parameter; i.e.,
height.

         b.    sulfur Dioxide Control

    The typical coal evaluated in Chapter IV has a heating  value
of  8125 Btu/lb  and  a  sulfur content of 0.478 percent or less.
Hence, compliance with Federal emission standards can be realized
without the need for SO2 removal equipment.   However,  space  is
being  provided so that S02 removal equipment can be installed in
the future,  if required by changes  in  coal  characteristics  or
regulatory standards.
                               V-41

-------
         c.   Oxides of Nitrogen Control

    Compliance  with  Federal  emission  standards  for  NOx   is
effected  by efficient operation of the boiler.  Stack monitoring
of NOx emissions and the manufacturer* s furnace guarantee provide
additional assurance  that  Neal  Unit  H  will  meet  the  above
standards.  Present state-of-the-art removal of NOx from the flue
gas  is  economically  unfeasible.   The Environmental Protection
Agency has stated that combustion additives are ineffective as  a
control  measure.  Therefore, no feasible alternative NOx control
technique exists at the present time.

         d.   Particulate Matter Control

    In Section II-B-U, reasons were given for the selection of  a
hot-side   electrostatic  precipitator  for  Neal  Unit  U.   The
alternative particulate matter control devices include  cold-side
electrostatic   precipitators,  mechanical  collectors,  baghouse
filters, wet scrubbers and various combinations of these devices.

              i.   Electrostatic Precipitator

    Cold-side  and  hot-side  electrostatic  precipitators   have
identical principles of operation  (see Section II-B-4).  However,
the  latter is placed at the "hot" side (inlet) of the combustion
air heater while the former is placed at the "cold" side (outlet)
of the combustion air heater.  Since the boiler flue gas cools as
it  heats  the  combustion  air,   the   cold-side   precipitator
experiences  flue  gas temperatures in the range of 250 to 300 F.
At these temperatures the chemical properties of the  flue  gases
and  suspended  particles  play  a  significant role.  Sulfur and
moisture   exhibit   appreciable   influence    on    particulate
resistivity.   When  sulfur  content  is  low  (up  to 2 percent)
resistivities in this temperature range are generally higher than
the critical value of  10»° ohm -  cm  and  electrical  operation
becomes  unstable.   Freguent  sparking could occur and it may be
difficult to achieve reasonable efficiencies.

    The  advantages  of  the  cold-side  precipitator  are   that
construction   materials   need  only  withstand  moderately  low
temperatures and volumetric requirements for a given mass flow of
the flue gas which are considerably  less  than  for  a  hot-side
precipitator.   Since  Neal  Unit  4  is  a  new plant, and since
materials technology is sufficiently developed, these  advantages
cannot  outweigh  the  previously  mentioned characteristics of a
hot-side precipitator.

              ii.  Mechanical Collector

    Mechanical collectors are utilized extensively, primarily  to
remove  relatively  large sized particles.  Mechanical collectors
can collect approximately 70 to 80 percent of  fly  ash  in  flue
gases  produced by modern pulverized coal-fired steam generators.
Such low collection efficiencies are not adequate to comply  with
                             v-42

-------
emission  regulations.   However,  this  does  not  preclude  the
consideration of mechanical collectors in conjunction with  other
more    sophisticated   emission   control   devices,   such   as
precipitators, in order to minimize associated problems with such
devices.

              iii. Baghouse Filter

    The baghouse filter is the oldest  method  of  dust  removal.
The principle of particle removal is simply to filter particulate
laden  gas through a fabric which retains the particle and allows
the cleaned  gas  to  proceed  on  through.   The  fabric  filter
collector  is  capable  of providing a high collection efficiency
for particles as small as 0.5 microns.   The  limitation  in  the
applicability  of this collection technique is dependent upon the
chemical and physical properties of  the  fabric  materials,  and
"caking"   associated   with   hygroscopic   properties  of  some
particulate substances.

    The primary limitation of baghouse filters corresponds to the
existence of a large amount of moisture.  Condensation, occurring
inside the collector, will foster the buildup of a  wet  cake  on
the   fabric   filter   surfaces,   increasing   the   resistance
sufficiently to curtail gas flow.  The cohesive properties  of  a
"mud-like"  cake  impair removal of particulate buildup employing
ordinary design methods.  The bags must be removed,  washed,  and
dried.  Frequently, under these conditions, the bags will shear.

    Some  particulate  substances  are  hygroscopic  and build up
excessively on the bag surfaces  when  inconspicuous  amounts  of
moisture are present in the flue gas.

    There  is concern about the effects of the sulfur dioxide and
moisture content in the flue gas.  This combination is  conducive
to  creating  conditions  which  can  shorten fabric life.  Other
parameters taken on a large scale basis, such  as  bag  cleaning,
resistance  profile, etc., which are significantly related to fly
ash characteristics, have not been established.

    These uncertainties, combined with the lack of any widespread
utilization by electric  utilities,  must  restrict  the  use  of
baghouse filters to special AQCS retrofit operations.

              iv.  Wet Scrubber

    Wet scrubbing involves washing the fly ash laden  flue  gases
with a liquid, usually water.  Wet scrubbers provide for intimate
contacting  between the flue gas and the scrubbing liquid in such
a manner that the particulates are transferred from the flue  gas
to the liquid and removed as a liquid effluent.

    The most common type of scrubber is the venturi.  The venturi
design  uses  the  kinetic  energy  of  the flue gas to shear the
curtain of liquid that converges with the high velocity flue  gas
                               V-43

-------
at  the  throat  section.   The  scrubbing  liquid  can either be
injected at the throat section or at the top  of  the  converging
section.

    To   achieve   at   least   99  percent  fly  ash  collection
efficiencies, pressure drops on the order of 10 to 12  inches  of
water   (gauge pressure)  are required.  To achieve 99 plus percent
collection efficiencies, pressure drops ranging  upward  from  12
inches  of  water  (gauge  pressure) to 20 inches of water (gauge
pressure) may be required.  Exact operating pressure drop depends
upon the gas flow rate  and  the  quantity  of  scrubbing  liquid
injected  into the scrubber.  The liquid flow rate nominally used
is 15 to 20 gal per 1000 absolute cubic feet per minute (ACFM) of
flue gas.  Saturation conditions (temperature and gas density) in
conjunction with the quantity of scrubber  liquid  determine  the
precise pressure drop.

    Fly  ash  scrubbing will also result in the removal of sulfur
dioxide from the flue gas.  Different fly ashes possess different
alkalinity properties.   Scrubbing  units  recirculating  a  high
alkaline   fly  ash  have  resulted  in  sulfur  dioxide  removal
efficiencies as  high  as  50  percent.   Such  removal  requires
special  materials  of  construction.   Also  depending  upon the
locality, the bleed liquid from the recycle scrubbing liquid  may
require  neutralization  before being transmitted to the existing
water treatment facilities.

    The major factors  in  excluding  wet  scrubbers  are  larger
operating  power  requirements  to  overcome  the relatively high
pressure  losses,  potential  water  quality  problems  requiring
additional intake water and water treatment facilities, potential
clogging,  corrosion  or  abrasion  problems  which  would affect
system reliability and economic cost.

              v.   Boiler Stack

    The potential of  the  atmosphere  to  dilute  air  pollutant
emissions  depends  on meteorological conditions, topography, and
boiler  stack  height.   Computation  of  pollutant  ground-level
concentrations,  presented  in  Section  IV-C, shows that the 469
foot Neal Unit 4 stack is adequate to meet ambient standards.   A.
taller   boiler  stack  would  permit  greater  dilution  of  the
pollutants emitted from the stack and thereby lower  ground-level
concentrations.   However, due to its proximity to the Sioux City
Municipal Airport,  the  Neal  Unit  4  boiler  stack  cannot  be
increased  from  its  proposed height of 469 feet; this limit has
been established by the Federal Aviation Administration.


    7 •   Solid Waste Storaqe and Disposal

    Neal Unit 4 will utilize an approximate 114 acre solid  waste
disposal  area  to provide storage for plant generated sludge and
ash.  Operational procedure will include  alternating  layers  of
                               V-44

-------
waste  material  with layers of soil to provide the potential for
reclamation of this area at some future date.   Provisions will be
made at the solid waste disposal area by use of water  trucks  to
minimize fugitive dust emissions.

    Alternatives   to  this  sytem  and  the  reasons  for  their
rejection are presented below:

         a.   Wet Storage Ponds

    Consideration was given to providing  for  storage  of  plant
generated  ash  and  sludge  in  wet  disposal  ponds.    The area
reguired for these ponds would be similar to  that  required  for
the  solid  waste  disposal  area.   Inherent in the use of a wet
system is the increase in plant consumptive water use to  satisfy
sluice water requirements.  In addition, blowdown from the bottom
ash  and  sludge  ponds  would  require  treatment  to  meet NSPS
effluent limitations prior to discharge back into the  river  and
fly  ash sluice water could not be discharged.  Consequently, for
these reasons the wet storage pond system was judged to  be  less
acceptable,   both  from  an  environmental  and  an  engineering
viewpoint, than the solid waste disposal area.

         b.   Off-Site Disposal

    Consideration was given to providing  for  total  or  partial
off-site   removal   of  solid  waste   (ash)  by  an  independent
contractor for marketing purposes.  Unfortunately, at the present
time no firm market exists for utilization of the  ash  generated
by  Neal  Unit  4.   However,  should  conditions  improve in the
future, this alternative would be explored further.


    8•    Lining of Major Storage Areas

         a.   Coal Storage Area

    Initial investigation of a coal storage area lining  at  Neal
Unit  4  indicated  that  the capital cost of either a stabilized
lime-fly ash or a high density polyethelene membrane lining would
be about $2,000,000.  Because the ccal storage area  is  designed
so  that  rain water will predominately run off the coal pile and
will be transported by a ditch system  to  a  holding  pond,  the
excessive cost associated with the installation of a lining under
the coal storage area was not deemed justified.

    Preliminary tests of coal pile runoff at the existing station
indicates  basic pH characteristics.  It is the intention of Iowa
Public Service Company to conduct ground water quality monitoring
underneath the existing station coal pile and a  control  station
prior to establishing the location of the Neal Unit H coal pile.
                                V-45

-------
         b.   Coal Runoff Holding Pond

    Based on the preliminary analysis of the coal  from  the  Red
Rim  area  proposed  for  Neal  Unit  4 (Section II-B-4),  the low
sulfur characteristic  of  the  coal  indicated  a  high  calcium
content  that  will  result  in  a  high  pH  of any runoff water
entering the holding basin.  This  is  supported  by  field  data
obtained from studies at Neal Unit 3 indicating pH values of 7-9.
The  combination  of  this  high pH runoff and the long detention
time in the holding pond would result in  the  precipitation  and
sedimentation  of  materials  in  the  runoff.  In addition, this
effluent would be further treated in the wastewater system  prior
to discharge.  Based on the projected runoff characteristics, the
approximate  cost of $500,000 and the fact that a lining could be
installed at a later date if it were deemed necessary, no  lining
will be installed at the present time.

         c.   Solid Waste Disposal Area

    The lack of deleterious environmental impacts associated with
the waste disposal areas at Neal Units  1-3,  combined  with  the
excessive  cost   (approximately  $5,000,000)  associated with the
alternative of  lining  under  the  solid  waste  disposal  area,
resulted in a decision that a lining in this area was unnecessary
and uneconomical.
    9.   Fuel Supply

    The primary source of coal for Neal Unit 4 will  be  the  Red
Rim  area of Sweetwater and Carbon Counties in Wyoming.  A letter
of intent has been signed with the Rocky Mountain Energy Company,
a subsidiary of Union Pacific Corporation, to develop a plan  for
a joint mining venture with Centenial Coal, Inc., a subsidiary of
Iowa Public Service Company.  Negotiations for a formal agreement
are in progress.

    An  alternative  source of coal for Neal Unit 4 could be from
mines in the Hanna, Wyoming area.  Three mines in this  area  are
currently under long-term contracts to supply fuel for Neal Units
1-3.   Typical  characteristics  of  the coal from this area were
presented in Chapter II.  Since the Neal Unit 4 boiler will  have
the   capability   to   burn   coal  with  a  wide  variation  in
characteristics, the potential for supplying  Neal  Unit  4  from
mines  in  the  Hanna  area,  or subsequently from mines in other
areas, could be investigated should  difficulties  arise  in  the
negotiations for the Red Rim area.

    In  all  cases,  the  mining operations would comply with all
existing regulations such as those set  forth  by  the  State  of
Wyoming,  U.S.  Bureau  of  Land  Management   (43 CFR 3041), U.S.
Geological  Survey   (30  CFR  211)  and  the  U.S.  Environmental
Protection  Agency (40 CFR 434).  The Energy Development Company,
which  will  operate  the  Neal  4  mine,   follows   operational
                              V-46

-------
procedures  which  involve  the  leveling  of  stripped areas and
replacement of topsoil followed by reseeding of  all  areas  with
local  grasses.   During  five  years of mining in this area, the
Energy  Development  Company  has  disturbed  about  300   acres.
Approximately  90 percent of this area has already been reclaimed
or is in the process of being restored from wasteland to valuable
grazing land.
                                  V-47

-------
D.  ALTERNATIVES TO  NORMAL  MODE  OF  OPERATION  FOR  MINIMIZING
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

    EPA  is concerned about the loss of larval fish via condenser
and plume entrainment resulting from  George  Neal  Station.    At
certain  flow  rates in the river and at full power large numbers
of larval fish will be killed which  may  cause  significant  and
measurable adverse impacts on the Missouri River ecosystem.

    As  indicated  in  Chapter  III, there is a difference in the
larval fish population  reported  at  the  existing  George  Neal
facility from that reported at Omaha Public Power Districts,  Fort
Calhoun  Station.  It is acknowledged that there are geographical
differences and differences  in  the  time  of  data  collection,
however,  it is EPA's opinion that data collected at Fort Calhoun
may represent the larval fish population in this section  of  the
Missouri River.

    Because   of   the   difference   in  estimated  larval  fish
population,  and  the  somewhat  uncertainty  of  the  source  of
recruitment  of  larval  fish  downstream of George Neal Station,
several studies will be conducted  to  lead  to  a  selection  of
possible   alternative  modes  of  operation.   If  data  becomes
available to show that the proposed operational mode will  indeed
result  in significant adverse impact, EPA may recommend that one
of the following alternative modes of  operation  be  adopted  to
minimize the impact:

    •    Adjust power generation of Neal Unit  U  with  resultant
reduction  of  cooling water flow, during the time of larval fish
passage to  adequately  reduce  the  environmental  impact.   Any
adjustment  could  be  keyed  to  those  species  of  fish  which
potentially would be most severly  impacted.   For  example,  the
peak  entrainment  time for walleye and sauger occurs in May (Ft.
Calhoun data).  It is possible a reduction in cooling water  flow
during this time would reduce the impact of plant operation.

    •    Modification of the daily operational procedures of  the
plant  to  retain  its  daily  peaking  ability, but reduce power
output during other  times  of  the  day  to  reduce  entrainment
losses.

    Detailed  studies  by  the applicant to identify the areas of
spawning and recruitment along with additional documenting of the
species composition and numbers of local fish entrained may  lead
to  a conclusion that no operational modifications are necessary.
However, based on the information available  at  this  time,  the
above  alternatives  or  other  modifications  described  in this
chapter will be evaluated to minimize impact.
                               V-48

-------
                           CHAPTER VI

          RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USES OF
    MAN'S ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF
                     LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY
A.  INTRODUCTION

    The term "local short-term uses11 of  the  Neal  Unit  4  site
refers  to  the period of plant construction and operation (about
30 years).  The  term  "long-term  productivity"  refers  to  the
environmental resource development potential through the lifespan
of  the  proposed plant and beyond.  Short and long-term impacts,
both beneficial and adverse, may be associated with  the  use  of
the Neal 4 site.

fi.  SHORT-TERM USES

    1.   Beneficial Impacts

    A short-term benefit of the  expansion  of  the  George  Neal
Steam  Electric  Station  will  be  the  creation  of  generating
capacity adequate to meet the electrical power needs of the owner
utilities,   Mid-Continent   Area   Power   Pool   Members    and
Mid-Continent Area Reliability Coordination Agreement Region (see
Chapter  I).  This augmented supply of electrical energy would be
available throughout the service area to the public  as  well  as
for  industrial,  commercial,  agricultural,  public service, and
recreational use.  With the proposed capacity, Neal Unit  4  will
provide  greater  system  reliability  and  a  reduction  in  the
duration and extent of possible system disturbances.

    Additional short-term benefits can be anticipated during  the
construction  phase.  These include the creation of new jobs, the
expansion of local commerce and other related secondary  economic
activities.   Also,  a  growth  in  the  local  tax  base will be
generated  directly  from  the  expanded  facility   because   of
increased  payrolls  and  business  activity.   On  the  basis of
current tax rates, Neal Unit 4 will represent $6,300,000 annually
apportioned  to  36  counties  and  400  school   districts   and
townships.

    2.   Adverse Impacts Which Cannot be Avoided

    Environmental impacts which are likely  to  result  from  the
short-term  use  of  the Neal Unit 4 site have been identified in
Chapter IV.  These impacts must be traded-off in  the  short-term
in order to realize the beneficial effects of the proposed plant.
However,  in  most  instances, measures are being taken to reduce
environmental  impacts  to  minimal  levels   well   within   the
applicable  standards  of  federal and state regulatory agencies.
Systems,  including  those  used  for  dust  control,  water  and
                               VI-l

-------
wastewater  treatment  and  air  quality  control are expected to
mitigate environmental impacts.

         a.   Water Quality

    Neal Unit 4 will produce a certain amount of thermal (Section
IV-B-2), chemical   (Section  IV-E),  solid  and  sanitary  wastes
(Section  IV-D).   The  regulations set down by appropriate state
and federal agencies limit the release and concentration of these
wastes.  As presented in Chapter IV, no  adverse  impact  on  the
balanced  indigenous  aquatic populations is expected as a result
of discharges into the Missouri River.

         b.   Air Quality

    Emissions of air contaminants and occurrences of ground level
concentrations due to the operation of a coal-fired  power  plant
such as Neal Unit 4 can te reduced, but not completely prevented,
by  air  quality control systems  (Section IV-B-4).   However, both
emission rates and ambient  concentrations  are  expected  to  be
within  the applicable federal and state standards established to
protect  the  environment  from  kncwn  and  anticipated  adverse
effects,  allowing  a  reasonable margin of safety.  Therefore no
significant adverse effects  on air quality are expected.

         c.   Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat

    The short-term impact of Neal Unit 4 on the terrestrial biota
will be to remove a portion of the riparian shrub,  winter  browse
and agricultural land serving as habitat and food sources for the
many  wildlife  species  inhabiting  the  area.   If  the Snyder-
Winnebago Recreation Area is  instituted,  the  land  immediately
south  of  Neal Unit 4 will remain a productive habitat for these
wildlife species throughout the life of the plant.

         d.   Aquatic Ecology

    The probable adverse effects of  operation  of  Neal  Unit  4
which cannot be avoided include:

                i. Impingement of fish on  the  intake  structure
                   resulting in damage or death.

               ii. Entrainment of planktonic organisms  into  the
                   circulating  water system, resulting in damage
                   or death.

              lii. Entrainment of planktonic organisms  and  fish
                   in  the  thermal plume, resulting in damage or
                   death.

    Though mortalities of biota can be expected,  the  impact  on
the aquatic ecosystem will not be measurably significant.
                                VI-2

-------
         e.   Land

    An adverse environmental effect on  land  use  would  be  the
withdrawal  of  the  450  acre Neal Unit U site from agricultural
use.  Since this acreage  is  minimal  (less  than  0.1  percent)
compared  to  the  total  agricultural land available in Woodbury
County, it is not expected to present serious  problems.   Visual
impact  of  the plant complex from the potential Snyder-Winnebago
Recreation Area is probable.  Opportunities  for  mitigating  the
visual  impact  are  being  instituted  through  landscaping  and
planting procedures at key locations on the site.

    It is not expected that serious socio-economic problems  will
be   encountered  in  the  surrounding  area.   Since  the  major
construction work force is expected to come from the  Sioux  City
area,  social  service  impacts  upon the local community will be
minimal.
                              VI-3

-------
C.  LONG-TEUM PRODUCTIVITY

    The maintenance of the resources  described  below  has  been
dealt  with  in  the  previous  chapters of this report.   In this
section  questions  concerning  their  potential  for   long-term
productive use are discussed.

    Maintenance   of   long-term   productivity  potential  seems
acceptable especially in the areas of thermal discharge into  the
Missouri River, aquatic biota, and ambient air quality since Neal
Unit 4 must comply with applicable state and federal regulations.

    To  maintain  long-term productivity of wildlife habitats and
recreational use in the area, Iowa Public Service has a  Wildlife
Management Agreement with the Iowa Conservation Commission.  This
agreement  sets  aside several small areas totaling approximately
65 acres in the area surrounding the George  Neal  Station  which
are  reserved  for  wildlife nesting and winter cover area.  Food
plot areas are left for winter feed from the  farming  operations
on  lands  of  Iowa Public Service.  Public hunting is allowed on
lands under the Wildlife Management Agreement.  In addition, Iowa
Public Service, with the cooperation  of  the  Iowa  Conservation
Commission,  has  planted more than 30,000 trees in a buffer zone
which will also provide wildlife habitat  at  the  Neal  4  site.
This Duffer zone is approximately 110 ft. wide and runs along tne
highway  separating  the  Neal 4 site from Brown's Lake and along
the property line separating the Neal 4 site from the Snyder Bend
park area.

    The Neal Unit 4 site includes about 114 acres for storage  of
plant-associated  solid  wastes.   This acreage is sufficient for
the life of the plant.

    Since the Port Neal Industrial District  is  presently  zoned
and  developed  for industry, land use is consistent with present
policy and this is not  anticipated  to  change  in  the  future.
Through  replacement  to  meet  demand, long-term productivity of
regional resources, dependent upon electric power, is expected to
continue long after the projected life of Neal Unit 4.
                                VI-4

-------
                           CHAPTER VII

     IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF RESOURCES

A.  GENERAL

    Construction and operation of Neal Unit 4 will result in  the
irreversible  and irretrievable commitments of natural resources.
These resources will either be totally exploited  or  altered  to
the extent where their restoration would be impossible.

B.  FUEL

    The coal used to operate Neal Unit 4 represents  a  principal
irreversible commitment of natural resources.  After burning, the
major constituents of the coal will be bottom and fly ash.  These
constituents have teen altered greatly from the fossil fuels they
once were.

    During  the  30-year  life  of  the  plant,  approximately 50
million tons of coal will have fceen  committed  and  irreversibly
changed,  based  on  projected capacity factors.  This represents
0.012 percent of the coal reserves in the United States.

C.  LAND USE

    1.    Power _Plant Site

    Land resources used for agricultural purposes  prior  to  the
construction  and operation of Neal Unit 4 will be eliminated.  A
total of 450 acres of land will be converted from agricultural to
industrial usage, and wildlife habitat in those areas are  to  be
landscaped  with  "shelterbelts." In view of changing development
trends, zoning, and the availability  of  relatively  inexpensive
energy,  it  is  doubtful  the  land  committed to the plant will
revert back to agricultural  production  after  Neal  Unit  4  is
decommissioned.   Therefore,  for  all  practical  purposes,  tne
agricultural productivity has been irretrievably lost.

    2.    Coal Mining Area, Wyoming

    The overburden will te irreversibly  altered  by  disturbance
and   replacement.    These  changes  will  affect  the  physical
stratification, density, and  compaction  of  the  topsoil.    The
terrain   will  be  altered,  potentially  resulting  in  changed
drainage patterns.

    3.    Other

    The increased power generated by the project  may  result  in
other  irreversible  changes  in  land use from new commercial or
private  development.   This  development  is  unpredictable  and
cannot be quantitatively evaluated in this statement.
                                VII-1

-------
D.  WATER

    The cumulative loss of water in the Missouri River basin over
the 30-year life of the project will  be  about  600  acre  feet,
resulting  from  evaporation of heated water in the discharge and
evaporation from the retention ponds.  This will be  a  continual
incremental loss of water during operation.

    According to present knowledge, trace elements carried in the
coal pile runoff and discharged into the Missouri River will have
an  irreversible  impact on the river's ecosystem since it is not
practical for these elements to be retrieved.   The  elements  may
precipitate  to  the  river floor or be suspended and transported
downstream.  Whichever  is  the  case,  these  elements  are  new
additions  to  the  ecosystem  which  would  not be present under
existing conditions.

    The runoff  from  mining  sites  will  be  altered  and  will
irreversibly  change  the  character of receiving bodies of water
(e.g., changes in pH and trace metal constituencies).

E.  CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

    Lxcept for materials which can te salvaged and recycled, most
man-made resources will be irreversibly lost or  altered  to  the
extent  that their use has been limited.  These materials include
steel, aluminum, copper, zinc, lead items, oils  and  fuels,  and
concrete.

F.  LABOR AND MANPOWER

    During   the   3 1/2-year   period   of   construction,    an
irretrievable   commitment  of  human  resources  will  be  made.
Approximately 25,900 iran-months of labor will be employed  by  an
average  of  700  workers.   This  labor  is  needed to engineer,
construct and operate Neal Unit H.
                             VII-2

-------
                          CHAPTER VIII

                    COORDINATION WITH OTHERS
A.  CONTACTS MADE BY APPLICANT

    The following federal, state,  county and local  agencies  and
individuals  were  contacted  by  the  applicant  concerning  the
proposed plan for construction and operation at Neal Unit 4:

         U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region VII
         Kansas City, Missouri

         U. S. Corps of Engineers, Omaha District
         Omaha, Nebraska

         Federal Aviation Administration
         Kansas City, Missouri

         Iowa Department of Environmental Quality
         Des Moines, Iowa

         Iowa Natural Resources Commission
         Des Moines, Iowa

         Iowa Conservation Commission
         Des Moines, Iowa

         Iowa Commerce Commission
         Des Moines, Iowa

         Nebraska Department of Environmental Control
         Lincoln, Nebraska

         Woodbury County Health Department
         Sioux City, Iowa

         Woodbury County Board of Supervisors
         Sioux City, Iowa

         Woodbury County Conservation Commission
         Sioux City, Iowa

         Woodbury County Planning & Zoning Commission
         Sioux City, Iowa

         Mayor & Council, City of Salix
         Salix, Iowa

         Mayor and Council, City of Sioux City
         Sioux City, Iowa
                               VIII-l

-------
Siouxland Interstate Metropolitan Planning Council
Sioux City, Iowa

Mr. Ted Hoffman, Nebraska Chapter
Sierra Club,
Omaha, Nebraska

Sioux City Chapter Izaak Walton League
Sioux City, Iowa

Mr. George Wimmer
Sioux City Industrial Development Council
Sioux City, Iowa

Sioux City News media
                     VIII-2

-------
B.  MEETING WITH ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS

    On July 8, 1976, the U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency,
U.S. corps of Engineers, Rural Electrification Administration and
Iowa Public Service Company held a meeting with some of the Sioux
City  area environmental groups.  Representatives from the Sierra
Club, Izaak Walton League, and Woodbury County Conservation Board
were present at the meeting.   Representatives from the League  of
Women  Voters  and  the  Audubon Society were invited but did not
attend.  The purpose of the  meeting  was  for  the  agencies  to
receive input and information concerning Neal Unit U in the early
preparation stages of the impact statement.

    Environmental issues such as water and air quality, land use,
and   wildlife  impacts  were  explored.   The  EIS  process  was
explained and discussed.  Another important  issue  discussed  at
the  meeting  was  possibility  of discharging cooling water into
Brown's Lake and Snyder Bend.  It was  stated  that  due  to  the
differences  in  the  lakes'  characteristics compared to those of
the discharges, they  would  have  to  be  assessed  as  separate
discharges  from  the  discharge  into  the Missouri River.  This
would require a new NPDES permit  and  a  separate  environmental
evaluation.
                              VIII-3

-------
C.  PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

    On  August  25r  1976,  EPA  and  the  Corps  held  a  public
information  meeting wherein all citizens were invited to comment
on the project and/or the EIS preparation process.   News releases
and public service  announcements  were  used  to  publicize  the
meetings.

    In  attendance  at  the meeting were representatives from the
federal  agencies,  ppwer  company,  news  media,   environmental
groups, and concerned citizens.

    Topics  of  the  meeting  included  type  and degree ot water
pollution, possible usage of cooling water to upgrade Brown  Lake
and  Snyder Bend, schedules for Neal Unit 4, and explanations and
rationales for the various permits required for the  construction
and operation of the power plant.

    No controversies or objections to Neal Unit 4 surfaced at the
meeting.

-------
          CHAPTER IX
   WRITTEN COMMENTS RECEIVED
              AND
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
           RESPONSES

-------

-------
          United States Department of the Interior
                    OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
                     WASHINGTON, D.C.  20240
ER 76/1021
Dear Mr. Svore:

Thank you for your letter of October 12, 1976, transmitting
copies of the Environmental Protection Agency's draft envi-
ronmental impact statement for the George Neal Steam Electric
Generating Station, Unit 4, Woodbury County, Iowa.

Our comments are presented according to the format of the
statement or by subject.
^eneral Comments

We note from Exhibit l-A-2 that the project is approximately
one-third complete.  As a result, many decisionmaker options
have been foreclosed and the utility of an environmental
statement at this point in project development greatly re-
duced.  Especially significant is the elimination of oppor-
tunities to implement the alternatives discussed in Chapter V
with the exception of those mentioned in section D.  For
example, further consideration of alternate plant sites and
alternatives to a once-through cooling system are precluded.
Outdoor Recreation

The environmental statement should recognize that the "Browns
Lake (Bigelow Park)" briefly described on page III-105 has
received matching assistance from the Land and Water Conserva-
tion Fund for the development of public recreation facilities.
Although it appears that no land will be taken from this park,
the applicant should be aware that this area is subject (in
its entirety) to the provisions of Section 6(f) of the Land
and Water Conservation Fund Act, as amended.  This section of
the Act requires that changes from the recreational use of the
land be approved by the Secretary of the Interior.
                                IX-1

-------
We suggest that the noise impact on recreation on and around
Browns Lake during construction be evaluated.  In addition,
the statement should include a non-technical discussion of
the noise impact of plant operation on both the Snyder Bend
and Browns Lake recreation areas.  The discussion on page
IV-92 suggests that the noise level in the Snyder-Winnebago
Bends Recreation Area will substantially exceed the maximum
noise level found to permit residential outdoor enjoyment.
Therefore, the conclusion on page IV-93 that plant operation
"... should not have a significant adverse noise impact on
the surrounding area" seems unwarranted.

The statement should evaluate impacts on the vegetation,
wildlife, and water quality in nearby recreation areas re-
sulting from atmospheric emissions.  Where scientific knowl-
edge is inadequate to make accurate predictions, estimates
should be given.based on observations of impacts resulting
from emissions from Neal Units 1-3.

Also, we believe that the final environmental statement
should include a discussion and worst condition analysis of
the cumulative impact of noise, visual intrusion, and atmos-
pheric emissions of all four Neal Units and the transmission
line on the continued recreational utility of the Browns
Lake and Snyder-Winnebago recreation areas.

Information presented in the statement contradicts the
conclusion on page V-12 that "the proposed activities would
be compatible with the present land use practice of the area."
Noise, aesthetic, and air quality impacts on nearby parklands
appear to be significant and are in need of a more complete
evaluation.
Historic and Archeological Sites

It is unclear from the discussion on page III-102 whether the
cultural resource survey undertaken in Kay, 1973, included
the proposed George Neal Steam Electric Generating Station,
Unit 4, as v;ell as the proposed Snyder-Winnebago Bends
Recreation Area.  In the event that the 1973 inventory in-
cluded the Unit 4 project area, the statement should provide
detailed information concerning the inventory and analysis of
cultural resources within the affected area, including a
                                 IX-2

-------
description of the survey methods utilized and extent of arche-
lolgical testing.  Complete coverage of the entire project
area including access roads and transmission facilities by a
professional archeologist is necessary.

Copies of correspondence with the State Historic Preservation
Officer (Mr. Adrian Anderson, Division of Historic Preserva-
tion, B-13 MacLean Hall, Iowa City, Iowa 52242) and the State
Archeologist (Dr. Duane C.  Anderson, 21 MacLean Hall, University
of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242) should be included within the
statement.  The statement should further reflect procedures to
be followed should previously unknown archeological resources
be encontered during project development.


Fish, and Wildlife

We understand that the best possible methods will be used so
that impingement on aquatic life will be kept at a minimum.
This is commendable but it is quite certain that the entrain-
ment will be of a greater magnitude than that described in
the draft environmental statement.  Species composition of
fishes found at other Missouri River generating stations do
not compare favorably with data gathered for the George Neal
Station.  A fair job has been done in qualifying the fishes
that will be lost during the once-through cooling process;
a poor job has been done in quantifying these losses.  Numbers
of fishes are of little use for entrainment studies when
these numbers are not correlated with volumes of water
sampled.  The draft environmental statement should.identify
the problems of entrainment in a more definitive manner and
describe what is to be done to lessen the impacts resulting
from this type of cooling process.  Two methods of mitiga-
ting the losses could be considered.  One is to limit the
velocities of water withdrawn and a second is to limit the
times that the water is withdrawn both seasonally and diur-
nally.   Potential mitigating measures of this nature should be
discussed in the final statement.
Lining of Storage Arenas

VJe are concerned that seepage from the ash disposal area and
the coal storage area will contaminate the groundwater.  Page
V-44 indicates that linings under the coal storage area and
the solid waste disposal area are not considered necessary.
                             IX-3

-------
Likewise the liner for the coal runoff pond will not be
installed at this time but will be considered later, if
necessary.  Little information is provided in the draft
statement to support these decisions.  More detailed
justification for the conclusions should be given in
the final statement.

A proper analysis of the impacts of leachates from the
ash ponds should be provided.  The suggested use of data
from existing ash ponds seems appropriate if similar
coals have been used in the existing units; we believe,
however, that data to be used should include information
on effects on the ground water beneath the existing ash
ponds in order to provide a firm basis for anticipating
or predicting effects.  The ground water impact analysis
should also include consideration of effects from infil-
tration of chemicals from the retention ponds A and B
discussed on page 11-35.

Monitoring programs to determine the impacts on ground-
water in the ash disposal and coal storage areas should be
described in the final statement with specific indication
of the mitigating measures the applicant is prepared to
implement if contamination of the ground water is signifi-
cant.
                       •
Solid Waste Storage and Disposal

In the discussions on page V-43, we do not understand the
rationale of storing the ash and sludge on-site and alter-
nating layers of waste material with layers of soil to
provide a potential for reclamation of this area "at some
future date."  The procedures employed for potential recla-
mation along with any specific plans for reclaiming the
area should be discussed more fully.

^§"ter_. Quality Monitoring Stations

Water-quality monitoring of the river below the proposed
plant should be considered.  This would permit assessment
of any adverse effects resulting from the combined waste-
water discharges.  The discussions on pages 111-24 to 27
appear to indicate that no monitoring stations will be
located below Unit 4.
                              IX-4

-------
Cumulative Impacts

No mention is made of the cumulative impacts of the various
generating stations along the Missouri River although Section
VII-D does mention the cumulative loss of water in the
Missouri River due to this project.  There are, for instance,
fifteen generating stations along a 360 mile stretch of river
from Sioux City to Kansas City.  Each plant is not an entity
apart from the others when the same air and the same body of
water are shared.  As future additions are made to the power
generating facilities in this area, cumulative impacts will
become increasingly important.  Recognition of this situation
should appropriately be given in the final statement with
some indication of its current significance.
                             Sin/rsrely yours,
                         t   Secretary of the Interior
                   A3Sis
Mr.  Jerome H.  Svore
Regional Administrator
Environmental Protection Agency
Region VII
1735 Baltimore
Kansas City, Missouri  64108
                                  IX-5

-------

-------
            DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION. AND WELFARE
                                REGION VII
                             FEDERAL BUILDING
                            601 EAST JZTH STREET
                         KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64106               OFFICE Of
                             November 24, 1976            THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR
Mr. Jerome H. Svore
Regional Administrator
U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
Region VII
1735 Baltimore
Kansas City, Missouri   64108

         RE:  Draft Environmental  Impact Statement
              George.NeaJ  5team Electric Generating Station
              NeaT'Onit 4
Dear Mr. Svore:

Thank you for the opportunity to review the above referenced document and
to comment on it's impact on responsibilities and interest of the Depart-
ment of Health,  Education and Welfare.

In the specific  area of "Impact on Local  Socio-economics" starting on
p IV-1 it is indicated that the Neal  Unit #4 will have a construction
schedule of approximately 3% years with a projected average construction
workforce on the site of 700 to a maximum of 1200 workers.  Further it is
estimated that it will require an estimated 100 to 700 workers with an
assumed average  family size of 3.1 persons relocating to Sioux City area
during various periods of construction.  It is conceded that not all
workers will relocate their families  and that the maximum population
increase in Sioux falls and vacinity  is expected to be 1.8% of the total
population.  Based upon this, the conclusion is drawn that "construction
worker immigration should have little,  if any adverse impact on housing
and social services in the area."

Data which is presented in the document would in part bear out this con-
clusion as far as housing is concerned  however, there does not appear to
be any data presented as to the types,  numbers, or case loads of social
services or the  numbers and types of  community facilities and services,
including health, from which a valid  conclusion can be drawn relative to
impact on "social service".

Demographic information is presented  in the document to show the ambient
state of the population in the area effected.  Such information and data
should also include existing community  facilities and services and other
                                 IX-7

-------
Mr. Jerome H. Svore                                      November 24, 1976


community resources which are utilized by the existing population with
discussion in the final EIS on the effect that the proposed project has
upon the services rendered.

Further, there should be some discussion to assure that adequate drainage
will be provided to borrow areas and construction sites  to reduce or
eliminate ponding of water and thus the enhancement of vector control  in
the area.

                                     Sincerely
                                     William H.  Henderson
                                     Regional  Environmental  Officer
                                                                    IX-8

-------
                   U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
                      FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
                               REGION SEVEN

                            P. O. Box 19715

                     Kansas City, Missouri  64141
                                                             November 4, 1976
   •
                                                              IN REPLY REFER TO:

                                                               07-00-ED

Mr. Jerome H.  Svore
Regional Administrator
U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency, Region VII
1735  Baltimore
Kansas City,  Missouri  64108

Dear  Mr. Svore:

The Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the George Neal Steam Electric

Generating Station, Woodbury County,  Iowa,  has been coordinated with the

Office of the  Secretarial Representative,  DOT, and the Statement adequately

considers the  effect the project may  have  on road systems within the juris-

diction of the Federal Highway Administration.

                                     Sincerely yours,
                                     Steiner M.  Silence
                                     Director, Office of Environment & Design
                                   IX-9

-------

-------
                DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
               UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
MA'LING ADDRESS

COMMANDER
SECONO COAST GUARD DISTRi
FLUERAl BLDfi
1',20 MARKET ST
bT LOUIS MO  63103

•  16475

  Ser3

  3 December 1976
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Attn:  Mr. Jerome H. Svore
1735 Baltimore
Kansas City, MO  64108

Gentlemen:

We have reviewed the draft environmental impact statement for George Neal
Steam Electric Generating Station, Neal Unit 4. We have no comment to offer
on this document.

Thank you for  the opportunity to review this environmental impact statement.
                                   C. E. JOHNSON, JR.
                         Environmental Protection Administrator
                         By direction of the District Commander
Copy to:
COMDT (G-WEP-2/73)
DOT SECREP Region VII
DOT (tes), Office of Environmental Affairs
CEQ (5)
                             IX-11

-------

-------
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
823  Federal Building, Des Moines, Iowa   50309

                                                    November 5, 1976
Jerome H. Svore
Region VII Administrator
Environmental Protection Agency
1736 Baltimore
Kansas City, Missouri  64108

Dear Mr. Svore:

We have reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the
George Neal Steam Electric Generating Station, Neal Unit 4, in
Woodbury County, Iowa.

We have no comments at this time.

The opportunity to review and comment on this proposed project is
greatly appreciated.

The Soil Conservation Service would be happy to furnish assistance
with general site preparation through the local Soil Conservation
District.

Sincerely,

  ,./
  / <_-^
William J. Brune   [	,
State Conservationist
                                 IX-13

-------

-------
         DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
         FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
   DATE: November 16, 1976
IN REPLY  rt .^,-r-,  A
REFER TO: ACE~4
                                                   CENTRAL REGION
                                                   601 EAST 12TH STREET
                                                   KANSAS CITY. MISSOURI 64106
 SUBJECT: Draft - EIS - George Neal Steam Elect. Generating Station,  Unit

   FROM: Chief, Planning and Appraisal Staff

    TO: Jerome H. Svore, Regional Administrator
        The stack and the generator building for the generating plant were the
        subjects of Aeronautical Study No. 75-CE-579-OE and 75-CE-580-OE,
        respectively,  and received a "No Objection" airspace determination
        January 19,  1976.  This airspace  determination expires July 19, 1977.

        The stack was air spaced for a height of 470' (AGL) and a maximum of
        1546'  (AMSL).  On the basis of our study,  neither structure will exceed
        obstruction  standards of Federal Aviation Regulation, Part 77,  and
        neither will be a hazard to air navigation provided appropriate obstruc-
        tion marking and lighting of the structures is accomplished.
                                                  .•

        We have no  objection to the generating plant or stack.
  c	
         AMES H.  KING  )
                                                              o
                                                              m
                                      IX-15

-------

-------
                      FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION
                            REGIONAL OFFICE
                      31st Floor, Federal Building
                      230 South Dearborn Street
                      Chicago, Illinois  60604
                                                     December  21,  1976
Mr. Jerome H. Svore
Regional Administrator
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region VII
1735 Baltimore
Kansas City, Missouri  64108

Dear Mr. Svore:

     As requested in your October 12, 1976 letter, ve  have reviewed  the
need for power presentation given in Chapter 1  of the  Draft EIS  being
prepared for the addition of the coal-fired, 576 megawatt, Unit  No.  4  to
the George Neal Steam-Electric Generating Station operated by the  Iowa
Public Service Company.  Unit No. 4, scheduled  for service in May  1979,
is to be jointly owned with major interests by  Iowa  Public Service Company
(43 percent), Interstate Power Company (17 percent), Northwest Iowa  Power
Cooperative (17.4 percent), Northwestern Public Service  Company  (8.7 per-
cent) and Corn Belt Power Cooperative (4.9 percent).   Remaining  interests
in the Neal No. 4 Unit range from one to 15 megawatts  and are divided
among eight municipally owned electric systems.

     Comments of this office are in compliance  with  the  National Environ-
mental Policy Act of 1969, and the August 1, 1973, Guidelines of the
Council on Environmental Quality.

     The projected capabilities and capacity obligations of the  Iowa
Public Service Company as shown in Exhibit I-C-4 are consistent  with data
reported by them in the Mid-Continent Area Reliability Coordination  Agree-
ment (MARCA) Report to the Federal Power Commission  pursuant to  Commis-
sion Order 383-3.  Likewise, the capability projections  of Exhibits  I-C-2
and I-C-3 are the. same as the data reported by  MARCA in  their 1976 Appen-
dix A-l report.

     Iowa Public Service Company, in their Form 12E-2  report to  the
Federal Power Commission, projects an approximately  7.4  percent  average
annual growth in system peak load over the period 1976-1985.  Similar
peak data for the conbined Iowa Public Service  Company and Corn  Belt
T'ovctTC Cooperative systems presented in the MARCA Appendix A-l report
shows a projected growth rate of 7.6 percent for the 1976-1985 period.
Based on our analysis of these projections and  a comparison of them  with
data submitted by other systems in the area, we believe  the estimates
are reasonable.

                                 IX-17

-------
                              - 2 -

     Analysis for the combined Iowa Public Service Company and Corn Belt
Power Cooperative load and supply presented in the 1976 MARCA Appendix A-l
report indicates that without the addition of the  Neal  No. 4 Unit  as planned,
reserves for these systems will fall to  11.9 percent  by the summer of 1979
and to 4.9 percent by 1980.  This also assumes that approximately  135 mega-
watts of new combustion turbine peaking  capability currently under construc-
tion and a 25 megawatt share of the new  Council Bluffs  steam unit  will be
available prior to the 1979 summer peak  period.

     Interstate Power Company reserves for the summer of 1979, as  deter-
mined from the 1976 MARCA Appendix A-l report, would  be 15.9 percent of
their annual adjusted net demand if Neal No. 4 is  not available and they
would fall to 10.0 percent by the summer of 1980 without the addition of the
Neal unit.  Even with the addition of the No. 4 Neal  Unit, Interstate's
reserves are projected to fall nearly 150 megawatts below their reserve ob-
ligation level before the addition of their next scheduled unit in 1985.

     Northwestern Public Service Company's 1979 net generating capability
is projected to fall 16 megawatts below  their projected system demand if
the Neal No. 4 Unit is not available as  scheduled. Even with the  addition
of the new Neal Unit, Northwestern1s reserves will be two megawatts below
their 1979 pool reserve obligation.

     Northwest Iowa Power Cooperative (NIPCO), the remaining system with a
significant interest in the Neal No. 4 Unit, at present receives all its
power from the Basin Electric Power Cooperative and the U. S. Bureau of
Reclamation (USBR).  With increasing capacity obligations to, .thel'f member
Cooperative systems and a leveling of hy'ropover available from USBR, it
is prudent for NIPCO to secure additional generation  resources.

     Finally, any surplus capacity upon  initial installation of Neal. No. 4
Unit would be available to other systems in the MARCA region on'a  short-
term basis.                                             *"'w"

     Minimum system reserves required to maintain  a reliable electric ser-
vice are generally considered to be in the range of 15  to 25 percent. In
order to assure the continued reliability of the systems sharing in the
output of the proposed unit, we conclude that additional capacity  equiva-
lent to Neal Unit No. 4 is necessary by  the summer of 1979 to satisfy
applicants' desired reserve margin criteria.

                                        Very truly yours,
                                        Orel E.  IlauLadahl
                                        Acting Regional Engineer
                                 IX-18

-------
       )
 OFFICE
   OF
:. ANN ING
  .'•NO
BOX  94601 •  STATE CAPITOL • LINCOLN,  NEBRASKA • 6C509 • (402) 471 -".
                               Governor J. James Exon
                                 S;a;e Planning Officer
                                                 W. Don NoJi
                                                    Director
            November  15,  1976
            Mr. Jerome Svore,  Regional  Administrator
            Environmental  Protection  Agency
            1735 Baltimore
            Kansas City, Missouri
            Dear Mr. Svore:

            Under the provisions  of  OMB  Circular  A-95,  this  office has
            completed a state  level  review  of  the draft environmental
            impact statement for  the George Neal  Steam  Electric
            Generating Station, Unit 4.

            The proposed project  does  not appear  to  be  in  conflict with
            any state level comprehensive plans.   No comments were re-
            ceived during the  review of  the statement.

            This letter completes the  state clearinghouse  review.
            Sincerely,
             rafrHn G. White
            Natural Resources Coordinator

            WGW/klf
                                        IX-19

-------

-------
£


\



' \ ',
: o ,
)

i S.
~~ u
f


•"N :


\^__s/
L
s


"^


V^-X

ROBERT D. RAY
Governor
ROBERT F. TYSON
    Director
                        STATE OF IOWA
                        Office for Planning and Programmm;
                        523 East 12th Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50319  Telephone 515/281-3711
                                          STATE  CLEARINGHOUSE
PROJECT NOTIFICATION AND REVIEW SIGNOFF
   Date Received:  October 19, 1976       State  Application Identifier:  770448
                                                    Review Completed: November 9, 1976
   APPLICANT PROJECT TITLE:
   Draft Environmental  Impact Statement, George Neal  Steam  Electric Generating Station
   APPLICANT AGENCY:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
       Address        Region VII, 1735 Baltimore
   	              Kansas City, Missouri  64108	
   FEDERAL PROGRAM TITLE, AGENCY  U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
   AND CATALOG  NUMBER:
   AMOUNT OF FUNDS  REQUESTED:
                                   NA
   PROJECT DESCRIPTION:                          ~    ~~     ——	
   This is the  Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the George Neal Steam Electric
   Generative Station, Unit 4.
   The State Clearinghouse makes the following  disposition concerning this application:

      / X/  No  Comment Necessary.  The application  must be submitted as received  by
            the Clearinghouse with this form attached as evidence that the required
            review has been performed.

     /	/   Comments are Attached.  The application must be submitted with this form
            plus the attached comments as evidence  that the required review has been
            performed.
   STATE CLEARINGHOUSE COMMENTS
    CH-14 Rev.  9-75
                                                        Federal Funds Coordinator
                                        IX-21

-------

-------
     STATE HISTORICAL DEPARTMENT OF IOWA

     DIVISION  OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION
                                                     ADRIAN D. ANDERSON. DIRECTOR
                                                    HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER


                                                      December 3, 1976
        Mr. Jerome H. Svore
        Regional Administrator
        Environmental Protection Agency, Region VII
        1735 Baltimore
        Kansas City, Missouri  64108


        Re:  DRAFT Environmental Impact Statement for George Neal Steam Electric
             Generating Station, Neal Unit #4.


        Dear Mr. Svore:

             The opportunity to review and comment on the above draft EIS is
        appreciated.
             If we have properly interpreted the EIS, construction for the above
        project has been underway since March 1975 (page 1-2).   This construction
        apparently was started without the benefit of a cultural resources survey
        being conducted to determine if potentially significant archaeological,
        historical and architectural properties might be impacted as a result of
        alterations to the 450 acre site.
             We wish to point out what we consider to be inadequacies of sections
        of the report pertaining to cultural resources.

             A)  Section III G; pages 100-102.

                 1.  Reference to published and unpublished, literature utilized
                     in preparation of the section is not indicated.  This makes
                     it difficult to evaluate the accuracy of the section.

                 2.  Also lacking is any indication that a cultural resources
                     survey was made of the project site.

                 3.  Apparently there is a misunderstanding of  the applicability
                     of information provided from the Division's inventory.  The
                     The Division has not and does not consider the available.
                     inventory data to be sufficiently complete to adequately
                     represent the potentially  significant cultural resources in
                     this area.  Nor has the Division ever advised any agency
                     that such data obviates the need for thorough, well-planned
                     and well-executed, cultural resources surveys, nor is this
                     data intended to be a surrogate of such surveys.

                                                                                IX-23

3.13 MAC LEAN HALL . IOWA CITY.  IOWA 52243
                                         TELEPHONE 31 9-353-6949/31 9-353-41 86

-------
Mr.  Jerome H.  Svore
Draft EIS  George Neal  Steam Electric
           Generating Station.
December 3, 1976
Page 2
         4.   The  information contained in Section III G-2 does, however,
             represent what was available, to our knowledge, at the time
             It is, however, inadequate.

         5.   Reference to a "historical, archaeological, and cultural
             survey"  (III page 102) does not pertain directly to the
             impact of the above project since it concerns the proposed
             Snyder-Winnebago Bends Recreation Areas.

     B)   Section  IV 1  (page 76).

         6.   The  statement, "No historic,  archeologic site...will be
             adversely impacted by the transmission facilities", is
             made.  This should be modified to read, "No (known) historic
             sites,   archeologic sites...will be adversely impacted by
             the  transmission facilities."

     Additional comments, relating to the assessment of potential impacts
on cultural  resources, are as follows:

         7.   No surveys known to us have been made of the proposed or
             alternate transmission line routes.  There are no known
             sites which would be impacted along these routes but this
             does not obviate the need for surveys and such should be
             done prior to approval.

         8.   Finally, consideration should be given to two steamboat
             wrecks recorded to have occurred somewhere within two miles
             of the transmission facility.  Six additional wrecks are
             reported to have occurred between Sioux City and Winnebago
             Agency.

     We  hope the  above comments will be of use in preparing the final EIS
of the above project  and look forward to reviewing a much improved section
of the final statement.

Sincerely,


   /JL,  u.

Adrian D.  Anderson, Director
State Historic Preservation Officer

ADA/af
cc:   Wil.liam Butler,  IAS, Denver
     Chuck Spilker, National Advisory Council                         IX-24
                   on Historic Preservation

-------
The University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa 52242
 Office of the State Archaeologist
 Eastlawn
 (319) 353-5175, 353-5177
                                                                                  1847
                                                       January 3, 1977
      Mr.  Daniel A.  Vallero
      United States  Environmental Protection Agency
      Region VII
      Kansas City, Missouri  64108

      RE:   George Neal Steam Electric Generating Station,  Neal Unit 4

      Dear Sir:

      Thank you  for  the opportunity to comment on this report.  Reference is made
      in the report  to the identification of historic and  archaeological sites in
      the vicinity of the project (Chapter III,  Section G, 101-102).  However, the
      sources for this work are not cited in the bibliography.

      Further it appears from the discussion of  cultural resources that only a
      literature search was done of the project  area and not a cultural resource
      reconnaissance survey.   A literature search alone is not sufficient for
      evaluating the potential impact on cultural resources that may be present
      in the project area.   Could you please clarify these matters?

      We would also  like written assurance that  if no cultural resource field
      survey has been done, that such a survey will be conducted with ample lead
      time prior to  the construction of the generating station.
                                           Duane  C.  Anderson
                                           State  Archaeologist
     DCA:bh
                                      IX-25

-------

-------
          State UniVerSl'tlj of Science and Technology ||| | Ames. Iowa 50011
                                                   Department of Earth Sciences
                                                   253 Science Hall I
                                                   Telephone 515-294-4477
                                                   October 26, 1976
Mr. Jerome H. Svore
Regional Administrator
U. S. Environmental Protection  Agency
Region VII
1735 Baltimore
Kansas City, Mo.   64108

Dear Mr. Svore:

     In looking over  the draft  environmental impact statement for the
George Neal Steam  Electric Generating Station,  Neal Unit #4, I have
the following comments:

     1.  I did not see any reference  to the coal pile runoff area
         being sealed on the  bottom.   Therefore, any material that
         filters through the  coal  pile will certainly move into the
         ground water.  The leachate  developed as it moves through
         the coal  pile has a  possibility of containing some of the
         trace elements listed  in  the table in the report.  Likewise,
         I did not see any reference  to the dissolved solids composition
         of the coal pile runoff.   I  do not know exactly what this
         is, but I have read  reports  where this concentration can be
         extremely high.

     2.  The leaching potential of the ash ponds was discussed as
         a possibility and that an analysis would be conducted to
         determine this.  I did not see any alternatives listed
         should the results show that leaching does occur and that
         the ground water does  become contaminated by the leachate
         produced  from the ash  ponds.   It is important that a proper
         ground water study be  conducted to determine the potential
         for contamination from these ponds and also from the coal pile.

     I feel that the potential  contamination of the ground water by
both the coal piles and leachate developed from ash ponds is an area
'hat needs to be investigated properly.   I do not know of recent liter-
ature that addresses itself to  this problem and would be very
                                 IX-27

-------
Mr. Jerome H. Svore
October 26, 1976
Page 2
interested in seeing the data developed by consultants for the
owners of this new generating plant.

                                           Sincerely,
                                           Lyle V. A. Sendlein
                                           Professor of Geology
LVAS:bd
                                 IX-28

-------
     (Confederation of  C^nuironmental  \JraanizationS

                       P.O. Box 1147 • Ames,  Iowa  50010
                        December  16,  1976
 Mr.  Jerry  Svore, Regional Administrator
 Environmental  Protection Agency
 Environmental  Impact  Statement Program
 1735 Baltimore
 Kansas  City, MO 64108
 Dear  Mr.  Svore;

 Please accept  these comments  respectfully submitted  in response to the Draft EIS
 on  the George  Neal Electric Station #4.

 We  conclude that the major  issue  is the need for George Neal #4 which has not
 been  demonstrated by the acceptable techniques of demand forecasting.  Also,
 equally serious omissions are alternat iyes to construction, most particularly
 load  balancing efforts,  peak pricing mechanisms and public information and
 conservation program to reduce demand  in the" residential and industrial
 sector.

 A principal concern with respect to the George Neal complex is the air pollution
 impacts of the existing three units and the fourth unit as projected.  Our
 specific  comments point out the inadequate considerations given to the economic-
 ally  most  important pollutants and emphasize the failure of the draft EIS to
 review the scientific data available as well as the episodes of crop damage
 due to coal-fired plumes that have already been documented.

 Other shortcomings in the EIS are evident, but time and resources prevent our
 full  review at this time.

 S incerely yours,
James J. O'Toole
Act ing Cha i rman

Enclosures
                                                                          IX-29

-------
 ICEO                                                    December  16,  1976








                      ALTERNATIVES TO PLANT CONSTRUCTION






    Under Sec. 102(c)(iii) of NEPA, the alternatives to the proposed project




have not been adequately explored.  This fact is emphasized in the description




entitled, "Need for Power11 starting on page 1-9.  Documentation for need does




not appear in MARCA projections.  Such documentation, to be valid, requires




the support of econometric projection based on price/demand techniques of




analysis which are well established.  In general,  electric utility marketing




programs until recently have ignored these scientific techniques for project-




ing power demand, with the result that the mushrooming cost of power production




has generated spiralling rate increases.  These rapid sequences of rate hikes




have resulted in decreasing electricity usage, consequent  idle generating




capacity and dramatic  loss of investor confidence in the utility industry.




Overcapacity and decreased earning  in 197^ and 1975 led to a crisis.  Accord-




ing to Bankers Trust Company of New York, "Probably no industry has come




closer to the edge of financial disaster."




    This dilemma within the industry has been the result of casual and in-




adequate demand projections based on historical extrapolations in a market




that has changed dramatically.   Since 1970 when the cost of electricity pro-




duction stopped its downward trend, considerable increases in production costs




due to rapid rises in the cost  of installed kilowatt capacity combined with




decreasing availability factors of newer large units, have harnessed utility




customers with a legacy of debt for idle generating capacity.  The present




situation calls for a new pricing philosophy based on equitable and sound




economic techniques of analysis.  Applications of these techniques are no-




where in evidence in this Draft EIS of the Nea1 generating station.




Basically, two major considerations need to be addressed.
                                IX-30

-------
 ICEO                                 2                 December 16,  1976






     1.   Failure of  historical  pricing mechanisms to relay to the consumer




 through  price  signals  the  costs of his service on the basis of  time and




 quantity of  demand.




     2.   The  failure  to apply appropriate and established econometric tech-




 niques of  price/demand analysis to project future demand, so critical to




 estimation of  capacity needs.




     Correction of the  flaws  in pricing mechanisms are being undertaken by




 many utilities, principally  through orders from their state utility commis-




 sions  (Wisconsin, Missouri,  Vermont, New York, Michigan, Florida, etc.).




 These corrective actions are reflected in efforts to  initiate marginal cost




 pricing  and  time of  day pricing which in combination  can convey accurate




 price signals and improve  load balancing over short,  intermediate and long




 run  periods.  To list  these  specific cases and techniques requires consid-




 erable space, but the  options are well described in recent orders of the




 Wisconsin Public Service Commission and in the recorded testimony of Iowa




 Commerce Commission  hearings of December 7, '976.  Excellent detailed testi-




 money by recognized  rate economists are readily available (Charles J.




 Cicchetti  in Pacific Gas & Electric Company application #5^279  before the




 California Public Utilities Commission and in Madison Gas & Electric Company




 Docket #2-11-7^23 of  the Wisconsin Public Service Commission; also Fred J.




Wells in Docket #U-1933 before the Arizona Commission on behalf of Tucson




 Public Power.)   A brief report by J.  Robert Malko,  Chief Economist of the




Wisconsin Public Service Commission (Public Utilities Fortnightly, July  15,




 1976) is attached which describes the philosophy and feasibility of marginal




cost pricing and time of use pricing now being initiated in Wisconsin.




    Efficient load  management cannot  be achieved without accurate cost  of
                              IX-31

-------
 ICEO                                  3                 December  16,  1976







service information and the fair allocation of those costs to the users




creating the demand.  The present declining block rate structure in general




practice does just the opposite, it rewards the consumers  creating peak de-




mand through subsidies paid by off-peak users.  Such rate  structures did




not appear inequitable when the cost and price of electricity were de-




clining due to economies of scale and other efficiencies.   Since 1970,




however, the increasing costs of power have only emphasized the social




inequities and economic fallacy of declining block rates.




    Perhaps the most serious omission in the Nea 1  EiS is the absence of




justification supported by valid data which would lend credence to growth




projections claimed.  In particular, the three utilities (Iowa Public Service




Company, Interstate Power Company and Northwest Iowa Power Cooperative)




claiming the lion's share of the George Nea1  IV output disclose no infor-




mation on cost of service or load analysis to support the  need for the new




station.  Specific data are also lacking on the capital  cost of George




Nea] IV, its anticipated capability factor and its impact  on retail prices




of electricity in the residential and industrial service sectors.




    Such data voids cannot be explained away by claiming lack of information.




In particular, the methods of forecasting demand based on  the accepted pro-




cedures using economic models is by now a we 11-recognized  technique in the




industry.   A study published in 1975 by the Federal  Power  Commission demon-




strated that the projections of power consumption by the National Electric




Reliability Councils for 1980 were about 40% too high when econometric demand




analysis techniques were applied to each NERC.  In particular, MARCA projections




were 49% too high.  A copy of the report, "Electricity Demand;  Project Inde-




pendence and the Clean Air Act", ORNL-NSF-EP-89 is attached.  Overforecasting
                                IX-32

-------
 I CEO                                k                   December  16,  1976







demand is a serious economic flaw, especially since debt retirement of




today's new facilities accounts for roughly 75-80% of the average bill.




     Exhibit A is a list of references describing applications and results




of demand forecasting.  We urge that these techniques be considered in de-




veloping an economically and socially acceptable procedure that can more




accurately assess the need for George Neal IV.




     The Neal Draft EIS does not adequately report upon nor discuss the




data used as the basis for projecting demand in the MARCA and MAPP region




as indicated in the EIS.




     We anticipate that, to a large extent, the data necessary to accurate




demand forecasting is in the files of the utilities but additional data may




be required to apply the appropriate forecasting technique referred to in




our  Exhibit A.   The data needed for this type of analysis is well expressed




in the statement (Exhibit B) by Mr. Robert 0. Marritz, executive director of




the  Missouri Basin Systems Group and in Exhibit C by Mr. Roy B. Hurlbut,




utility specialist and energy adviser.   These two exhibits are taken from




testimony presented to the Iowa Commerce Commission at its hearing on




December 7, 1976.  We urge that the data needs described in these two state-




ments be obtained and a re-evaluation of need for George Neal |y be made on




the  basis of professional econometric analysis.  NEPA is very clear in empha-




sizing that all  agencies "Utilize a systematic, interdisciplinary approach...




in decision making."(102A)   CEQ Guidelines (38 Fed Reg 20550-20562, 1973)




express the responsibilities of Federal  agencies to develop a "rigorous ex-




ploration and objective evaluation of the environmental  impacts of all




reasonable alternative actions, particularly those that  might enhance environ-




mental  quality  or avoid some or all of  the adverse environmental  effects, is
                               IX-33

-------
 I CEO                                 5                  December  16,  19?6






essential."  1500.8(4).  It is apparent that in the failure to treat the




issues of demand forecasting and the application of marginal cost pricing and




time of use pricing, viable alternatives, which might result in postponing




or cancelling this economically and environmentally costly generating capac-




ity, were precluded from consideration.  We urge this omission be rectified




in a supplemental draft EIS.





                          ENERGY CONSERVATION OPTIONS




    The role of energy conservation has been ignored in the Neal  EIS.




Options to save energy in electric power consumption are many and varied.




The environmental and health costs of fossil fuel combustion are well docu-




mented in EPA and CEO. publications.  The political  implications of energy




saving have been emphasized in Project Independence reports and Federal




Energy Administration literature.  The economic burden in higher utility




bills to consumers caused by the new George Neal IV station are not analyzed




in relation to the potential savings to be gained from conservation techniques.




It is obvious that any program of conservation requires some investment.




What is needed in this case is a Cost/Benefit analysis of alternatives




which in fact are called for under CEQ. guidelines.




    Conservation measures should be considered in two general ways;




(1) greater efficiencies at the same level of consumption, and (2) modifi-




cations of technology and/or practice which decrease total energy consumption.




    The first approach can be achieved through load balancing and full




substitution.  Load balancing had been effectively demonstrated in peak




load pricing techniques in Vermont and is now underway in Wisconsin and




planned by several other states.  Pennsylvania Electric Company simply




through a publicity campaign aimed at reducing residential peaks, realized a
                                 IX-34

-------
 ICEO                                6                   December  16,  1976







22%  improvement with a $700,000 saving.  Fuel substitution using the more




efficient fossil fuels for hot water and space heating as opposed to




electric  is capable of reducing peaks as well as total use.




     Information on appliance efficiency is a valuable help in consumer se-




lection of high wattage units.  Air conditioners are a prime target since




they create the summer peaks in midwest residential demand.  A study of a




Missouri  service area showed that replacing all air conditioners of low




efficiency with the most efficient models available would be a cheaper option




than building the power plant required to meet the rising demand created by




the old air conditioner peak.




    Such options for conservation should be analyzed on a cost/benefit basis




of KW of demand saved vs newly installed generation capacity.  The response




of industrial  customers in Iowa to load management programs  is proved by




the successful test run by IPALCO to reduce load of 15 large consumers in




the summer of  1975.  The projected periods of high demand were relayed to




the cusomters  who were given credit for reducing their demand.  Peak power




was reduced by 3521 KW at a cost of $10,563 in credits.   Contrast this to an




installed cost of $800/kw which would require a capital  investment of 2.8




million dollars.  In summary, we urge that conservation alternatives be




initiated and  developed under  guidelines of the Energy Conservation Act of




1976 and the assistance of other Federal,  state and private parties as




directed under NEPA and CEQ. Guidelines.  The alternative of "Not Providing




Power", p. yl  of the EIS,  is a wholly inadequate statement in addressing




the alternatives contained in para.  102(c)2(iii)  of NEPA.
                                 IX-35

-------
                                     7                   December  16,  1976






                               AIR EMISSIONS




    In estimating air emissions,  first order consideration  is coal  composition.




In the EIS, p. II-3, the presently operating Neal  Units 1-3 are described as




using Hanna Wyoming coal with an  average sulfur content of  0.6%.  This  coal




created an emission rate of 1.3 Ib/mB which is permissible  for old  sources




but would not be for new sources.   Over on p.  IV 56 an inconsistency appears




when the typical S content is said to be 0.32%.   This, we presume,  is the




same Wyoming coal source.  Such casual use of  analytical  data is  unacceptable




for several reasons.




    1.  Sufficient replicates of  coal should be analyzed to provide a variance




and confidence level of analysis.




    2.  Coal should be sampled in  the prescribed manner throughout  the  seam




and throughout the seam face in order to provide a measure  of the variance




of the chemical constituents due  to the naturally occurring compositional




differences.  Adequate chemical data have been  reported on Western coals to




demonstrate large naturally occurring chemical variances within a seam on




both vertical and horizontal axes.  In the case of sulfur,  this variance can




be threefold.  It is therefore possible for George Neal IV  to exceed Federal




emission standards for extended periods when higher sulfur  areas  are encountered.




Unless more definitive evidence is presented to assure compliance,  we urge




scrubbers be installed.




    The emission of minor constituents released either as a gas or  particle




has not been treated adequately.   The toxicity of many of these elements




is well known, e.g., the heavy metals Pb, Cd,  As,  Se,  Hg, etc., and the




lighter elements Be and F.  The mass balance of these  elements through  the




plant should be considered in detail.  There is a sequestration process
                                   IX-36

-------
 ICEO
                                     8                  December 16,  1976
taking place  in all coal-fired plants.  Some elements are found enriched




in bottom ash while some are enriched  in stack gases and fly ash.  The




trend for many toxic elements to become enriched  in the small participate




size  (.1 to 1 micron) of fly ash poses respiratory threats since they




reach the lung alveoli.  Even though these particulate releases may meet




emission standards, they add to air shed loads since they are capable of




being transported  large distances.  These  incremental pollutant loads




added to urban air sheds should be discussed in relationship to the findings




of EpA's CHESS report.  Such factors also should  be considered on a Cost/




Benefit basis.




    Of these minor elements, fluorine  poses a very great threat to vege-




tation.  It is 100 to 1000 times as toxic as sulfur dioxide and the sulfur/




fluorine ratio in Western coal makes fluorine a greater threat to sensitive




native and agricultural plant species  than sulfur.  The phytotoxic effects




of fluorine were discussed by Gordon et_ £_]_. at the American Chemical Society




Symposium on Fluorine Compounds in the Environment, 8/31/76 at San Francisco,




California.   We urge that direct data on fluorine concentrations in the air




and environment of George Neal units 1-3 be determined.   The environmental




sampling program reported by Gordon in Montana showed fluorine accumulation




and significant pathology to native vegetation in the vicinity of a 180 MW




power plant  burning Rosebud seam coal, a "typical11 Western low sulfur coal.




The impact  of 1573 MW of George Neal 1-4,  by comparison,  approaches an order




of magnitude greater threat.




EIS p. IV-63,  Effects on Terrestrial Biota




    This section,  which deals with potential  impacts of  very significant




economic importance,  is deficient  in addressing the known scientific facts
                                 IX-37

-------
 I CEO                                9                 December  16,  1976






about sulfur dioxide pollution.  It also attempts in the opening paragraph




to place this serious plant toxin in a favorable light by suggesting a




minor and debatable benefit.   Indeed, the fact that leaf stomata take up




SO,,  is the principal explanation for the first step in the toxicity chain




of events.




    The conclusion on p. IV 63, "it appears unlikely that the predictable




maximum annual concentrations from George Neal Units 1-4 will injure flora




of the site and surrounding region" is made in the face of scientific evi-




dence to the contrary.  Much is made of the data projected from diffusion




modelling which would support the hypothesis that emissions from all four




units will meet ambient and emission regulations.  In the first place, we




believe that these projections are inadequate substitution for sufficient




field observations which should have been underway at sites 1-3 and carried




out  in a more purposeful scientific design.  Even dismissing this criticism,




however, the facts under consideration in the NEPA process are not simply




compliance with regulations, but the estimation of any impact this project




will produce irrespective of regulations.  The following observations amplify




the  impacts of sulfur dioxide and emphasize the omissions of these important




data in the draft EIS.




     1.  The sensitivity of economically important crops in this area, corn




and beans, has been demonstrated in controlled experiments at S0_ levels




well below even secondary standards.  In 1966-7, the National Air Pollution




Control Administration carried out greenhouse studies in Kansas City on




sensitive plant species including corn and beans.  The experimental plots




were grown in an atmosphere whose S0» levels during the growing season were




below Federal ambient standards.  Nevertheless, plant growth was suppressed




25-50% compared with controls.
                                   IX-38

-------
 ICEO                                10                      December 16, 1976







    2.  Serious fumigation episodes at Mount Storm, West Virginia in 1972




 and Kyger Creek, West Virginia in  1973 caused extreme foliar damage.  In




 July of 1971 and twice during 197*1, the plume of the TVA 1750 MW Shawnee




 plant fumigated at acute  levels affecting 26,400 acres of soybeans  in 1971




 and 41,800 of vegetation  in 1974.  EPA representatives made field obser-




 vations during these episodes and a full description including the potential




 for similar impacts at the George Nea] site should be presented.  In ad-




 dition, the comments of Dr. Clarence C. Gordon, Plant Pathologist, Univers-




 ity of Montana, Missoula, who investigated and reported on these episodes,




 should be sought.




    3.  The National Environmental Research Laboratory of EPA has been con-




 ducting Zonal Air Pollution research with SO. at their Montana study site.




 Results of these studies  should be obtained and the data, where possible,




 used in evaluating vegetative impacts at the George Neal site.




    4.  The section on acid rain  (EIS, p. IV-67) is a vague and incomplete




 description of the scientific knowledge and true impacts of acid rain.




 Since 1952, European investigators have carried out precipitation chemistry




 studies throughout western Europe.  These studies,  which are reported in




 over 100 scientific articles,  demonstrate rather vividly that acid rain




 primarily caused by atmospheric emissions of the industries of Germany,




 France, and England have  caused in the past and are currently causing a




 serious impact upon the aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems of Norway and




Sweden.  A condensed version of what is currently knownabout acid precip-




 itation and its effect on ecosystems can be found in a 1976 USDA 1,074-page




publication (Technical  Report  NE-23),  "Proceedings  of the First Internationa]




Symposium on Acid Precipitation and the Forest Ecosystem."  It is imperative
                                  IX-39

-------
I CEO                                11                  December 16,  1976






that the EIS writers obtain this publication and attempt to relate the known



data to the potential S0_ and NCL emissions to be released from stacks of



George Neal units ]-k.  In amplifying further the specific impacts on



plants of acid rain, we suggest the report of Gordon in "Proceedings of



Fort Union Coal Field Symposiurn V25-26/75" at Eastern Montana College,



Billings, be reviewed.  Also important  is Gordon's testimony before the



Montana Energy Siting Board in 197^~75-   The need for a rainwater monitoring



program to determine the acid rain potential of the currently operating



George Neal Units 1-3 is essential.  It  should have been initiated at least



by the Spring of 1976 when NEPA procedures began to be applied.  The entire



on-site monitoring program for providing needed data on the phytotoxic pol-



lutants is inadequate.  We urge that steps be taken to design a program



that will provide sufficient data to establish a benefit/cost analysis on



potential economic impacts to agricultural crops resulting from the George



Neal complex.



    The effects of air pollutants on higher animals starting on p. IV 69 of



the draft EIS omits  impacts on man.  Perhaps the reasoning here is that the



primary ambient air  regulations of the  Clean Air Act cover adequately such



impacts.  In our interpretation of NEPA, such is not the case.  CEQ. guide-



lines emphasize the  importance of detailed considerations of all  impacts.



In the case of the George Neal plume, the annual loads of pollutants released



are huge and may increase.  The ultimate fate of these pollutants, SCL, F,



NO  particulates with toxic trace elements, have to be evaluated  carefully
  /\


and their potential effects discussed.   These pollutants in part  are de-



posited locally, yet the bulk of all are transported considerable distances



off site.  They may be ultimately precipitated by wet and dry deposition
                                  IX-40

-------
ICEO                                 12              December 16,  1976



processes, arriving at target sites which may be highly sensitive  or re-

fractory.  At any rate, they contribute to pollutant loads in adjoining

air sheds and such incremental threats to human health, biota, and materials

are not  insignificant by any means.  These effects should be evaluated.

The atmospheric modelling and Benefit/Cost analysis technique of EPA are

capable of providing such information.   Such concepts are already  incorpor-

ated into the non point source philosophy.  Through these and the  previously

cited considerations, the provision of NEPA can receive the substantive

response it demands and the ultimate best alternative rationally adopted.
                                        (/  James  j.  O'Toole
                                            Act ing Cha i rman
                                            Iowa  Confederation of
                                              Environmental Organizations
                               IX-41

-------

-------
                                    //
                          LIST OF INFERENCES

  1. U.S.  Department of the Interior,  Bureau of Mines,  "Annual U.S.
     Energy Use Drops Again," News Release,  April 5i  1976,  Table  9.

  2. Energy Policy Project, A Time to  Choose;  America's  Energy Future,
     Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, Mass.,  1974, pp  13.

  3. Dupree, G,,  Jr. and Corsentino, J.S,, U.S.  Department  of  the
     Interior,  Bureau of Mines,  United States  Energy  Through the
     Year  2000, (revised),  December, 1975, pp  4-5.

  4. U.S.  Energy  Research and Development Administration, A National
     Plan  for Energy Research, Development and Demonstration:  Creating
     Energy Choices  for the Future, Vol. 1,  U.S.  Government Printing
     Office, 1975, PP S-4 through  S-6,  figures 4-2 and B-14, Table B-5.

  5. federal Energy  Administration, "National  Energy  Outlook,"
     February,  1976,  pp 2?6.

  6,  Mooz,  W.E.,  and  Mow, C.C.,  "California's  Electricity Quandaryi
     Estimating Future  Demand,"  The Rand Corp.,  (K-1084-NSF/CSRA),
     September, 1972.

  7.  Daly,  H.E.,  "Energy  Demand  Forecasting,"  Minnesota  Energy Project,
     December,  1974.

  8.  Council of Environmental  Duality,  "Conditions and Trends," The
     Seventh  Annual Report  of  the CEQ,  U.S. Government  Printing Office,
     September, 1976, pp  189.

  9.  Laitner, S., Motion  in the  Natter  of Iowa Power  and Light  Company
     Application for Revision  of Kates, Docket No. U-526, September 17,
     1976.

10.  Iowa State Commerce Commission, "kWh Growth Rate- Iowa Electric
     Utilities  for the  first eight months of 1976," Press Release,
    October  21, 1976.

11. Iowa Energy Poicy Council, Ei'KRGY; 19?6,  Second Annual Report,
    PP 53.

12. #2-pp 133 and #B-pp 188.

13. Chapman, L.D., Ackland, G.G., and  Mount, T.D., "Electricity
    Demand: Project Independence and the Clean Air Act," Oak Ridge
    National Laboratory-NSF,  (EP-89),  November, 1975, pp 11-12.

14. Chapman, D.,  Tyrol1, T., and Mount, T.,  "Electricity Demand
    Growth and the Energy Crisis," Science,  Vol. 178, November 17,
    1972,  pp 704-705.

                                                                       IX-43

                                 - 27  -

-------
15. WIT Energy Laboratory, Policy Study Group, Project Independence,
    Cambridge, Mass., March, 197.4.

16, U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs,
    "Summary Report of the Cornell Workshop on Energy and the
    Environment," sponsored by NSF, 92nd Congress, May, 1972, pp 137.

17. Regional Economic Analysis l>ivision, Survey of Current Business 54.
    19-45, April, 1974.

18. Federal Power Commission, 1970 National Power Survey, "The
    Methodology of Load Froecasting-," Part IV.

19. Chateau, Bertrand, "The Methodology of Long Term Forecasting i
    Limitations of Traditional Methods and 'Proposals," University of
    Grenoble, France, presented to a conference on Energy System
    Forecasting at the University of Wisconsin, Sept. -Oct., 1974.

20, Dubin, Fred S,, "Analysis of Energy Use on Long Island."

21. Fisher, F.M., and Kaysen, C.A., A Study in Econometrics i The
    Demand for Electricity in the United States. North Holland
    Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1962.

22. Houthakker, H.S. and Taylor, L.D., Consumer Demand in the
    United States , 2nd edition, Harvard Press, Cambridge, 1970.

23. Wilson, J.W., "Residential Demand for Electricity,"
    Review of Economics and Business, Vol. 11, No. 1, Spring, 1971.
    pp 7-22.

24. Anderson, K.P., "Toward Econometric Estimation of Industrial
    Energy Demand! An Experimental Application to the Primary Metals
    Industry," The Rand Corp., (R-719-NSF), December, 1971.

25. Houthakker, H.S., Verleger, P.K. andSheehan, D.P., "Dynamic
    Demand Analysis for Gasoline and Residential Electricity,"
    Data Resources, Inc., Lexington, Mass., 1973«

26. Levy, Paul F. , "The Residential Demand for Electricity in New
    England," MIT Energy Lab, (PB-227-172) , Cambridge, Mass.,
    November, 1973.

27. Venegas, E.G., "Energy Demand Forecasting at the State Level-
    The Minnesota Approach," Minnesota Energy Agency, March , 1976.

28. Mooz, W.E., "Projecting California's Electrical Energy Demand,"
    The Rand Corp., Santa 1-ionica, California, January, 1973i
                                                                      IX-44

                              - 28  -

-------
 29.  Mooz, W.E., Mow, C.C., and Anderson, K.P.,  "A Methodology for
     Projecting the Electrical Energy Demand of  the Residential Sector
     in  California," The Rand Corp., (R-995-NSF/CSRA), March,  1973.

 30.  Mow, C.C. and Mooz, W.E., "A Mehtodology for Projecting the
     Electrical Energy Demand of the Manufacturing Sector in California,"
     The Rand Corp., (R-991-NSF/CSRA), January,  1973.

 31.  Mow, C.C, and Mooz, W.E., "A Methodology for Projecting the
     Electrical Energy Demand of the Commercial  Sector in California,"
     The Rand Corp., (R-1106-NSF/CSRA), March, 1973.

 32.  Berlin, E. , Cicchetti, C.J., and Setlen, W.J., "Perspective on
     Power « A Study of the Regulation and Pricing of Electrical Power,"
     Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, Mass.,
33. Nelson, D.C., "A Study of the Elasticity of Demand for Electricity
    by Residential Consumers: Sample Markets in Nebraska,"
    Land Economics, February, 1965, PP 92-96.

34. Cargill, T.E. and Meyer, R. A., "Estimating the Demand for Electricity
    by Time of Day," Applied Economics. Vol. 3» 1971, PP 233-246.

35. Herman, M.B. and Hammer, M.J., "The Impact of Electricity Price
    Increases on Income Groups: A Case Study of Los Angeles," The
    Rand Corp., (R-1102-NSF/CRSA) , March, 1973.

36. Barman, M.B. and Tihansky, D.D., "The Impact of Electricity Price
    Increases on Income Groups i Western United States and California,"
    The Rand Corp., (R-1050-NSF/CRSA) , November, 1972.

37. California Legislature, Assembly Bill No. 1575, Chapter 276,
    subchapter 4, Planning and Forecasting, January 7, 1975.

38. Connecticut Legislature, Public Act No. 73-458, Senate Bill
    No. 2203, October 1, 1973.

39. Wyoming Power Advisory Council.

40. Minnesota Legislature, Minnesota Power Plant Siting Act,
    S.F. No. 2115, section 4, (ll6C,54).

41. New Hampshire Legislature, Chapter 162-F, 1971.

42. Taylor, C.D., "The Demind for Electricity! A Survey,"
    The Ball Journal of Economics, Vol. 6, No. 1, Spring, 1975.
                                - 29 -

-------

-------
                                          3
Testimony of Robert 0. Marritz
In the Matter of Regulations Proposed
By the Iowa State Commerce Commission
For "Location and Construction of
Electric Power Generating Facilities"
DOCKET NO.
RMU-76-3
     My name is Robert 0. Marritz.  I reside at 706 Lake Washing-
ton Boulevard South, Seattle, Washington 98144.
    For the past ten years I was employed as Executive Director and
Staff Counsel of the Missouri Basin Systems Group (MBSG), with
offices in Lakewood, Colorado.  MBSG is a regional electric power
supply planning and pooling group composed of 120 consumer-owned
electric systems and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.  MBSG member
systems serve portions of Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, The Dakotas,
Nebraska, Kansas,  Minnesota and Iowa.
    In my capacity with MBSG I was responsible for supervising
planning studies to determine future power supply requirements of
MBSG members.   I have also represented MBSG members in engineering
and economic studies involving other utilities and groups, including
at least one of inter-regional scope.
    My most recent activity with MBSG, relating to planning of gen-
erating facilities, involved the Missouri Basin Power Project
(MBFP).   The project is comprised of the 1500 megawatt Laramie
                                                              ix-47

-------
                             -2-
 River Station and an extensive 230 and 345 kilovolt transmission



 system.   It is located in southeast Wyoming and will come on line



 between 1980 and 1984.  Between 1973 and 19-76 I was very actively
                              • f


 involved in project planning as Chairman of the Project Management



 Committee,  Project Coordinator and as ex officio member of the



 Engineering and Operating Committee.  I also participated in Siting



 Studies and other analyses leading to sizing and location of the



 required facilities.



     I am a graduate electrical engineer (BSEE, 1961) from the



 University of Pennsylvania,  and hold a law degree (LL.B., 1965)



 from the George Washington University.  I am a member of the bars



 of the State of Colorado and the District of Columbia.



    This testimony is being submitted at the request of the



Iowa Energy Foundation.
                              IX-48

-------
                            -3-

                Information Required to Plan
                  Power Supply Facilities
                         »

    In order to determine the specific increments of electric
generating facilities required to meet anticipated requirements,
it is necessary to assemble and analyze various historic and pro-
jected data.  In my experience, these data should include, among
others:
    (l) system peak demand, by season or month, for approximately
the past ten years;
    (2) total system energy consumption, by season or month, for
the past ten years;
    (3) forecasted total system peak demand, by season or month,
for the ensuing ten to fifteen years;
    (4) forecasted total system energy consumption, by season or
month, for the ensuing ten to fifteen years;
    (5) for data in (1) through (4) above, actual and forecasted
requirements data for residential, commercial and industrial
consumers;
    (6) for each of the past ten years, naneplate kilowatts and
actual kilowatt hours generated for each generating unit, with
class (baseload,  intermediate or peaking) and type of generation
(e.g., coal, nuclear,  gas,  oil, or hydro) indicated;
    (7) for each of the ensuing ten to fifteen years, nameplate
kilowatts and projected kilowatt-hours to be generated for each
existing and planned unit,  with class and type of generation
indicated;
                             ix-49

-------
                              -4-
    (8) for each of the past ten years,  a load-duration curve for
the system's demand;
                          t
    (9) for each of the ensuing ten to fifteen years, a load-
duration curve for the system's projected demand; and
    (10) an analysis of hourly, daily, monthly and seasonal system
load trends, including information on the bases and methodology
for projections made in (3), (4), and (5) above.
    The above data, particularly that encompassed by (1) through
(4) and (7) would be necessary, in my view,  to a utility planning
additional generation.  Specifically, projected capacity (kw) and
energy (kwh) data are both required,  as  well as historical data,
to analyze the type of generation increment  which should be con-
sidered by a utility.  (Projected capacity and energy data was,
I might add, furnished the Wyoming Public Service Commission by
the applicants in the Missouri Basin Power Project.)
    As one example of why both capacity  and  energy data are re-
quired, a projected deficiency of 500 megawatts does not necessarily
imply a requirement for a 500 megawatt net block of baseload gen-
erating capacity.  Depending upon the indicated associated energy
requirement, tne utility's need might be met by 500 mw of peaking
capacity,  or some mix of baseload,  intermediate and peaking.
                           ix-50

-------
                QUALIFICATION^ OF ROY B. HURLBUT

        Roy B. Hurlbut, ^alem, Oregon, is a utility specialist
and energy adviser, with over twenty years of experience, most
of which was in the private utility area.  He is co-author with
Battelle Labs of the Oregon Energy Stuqy, a comprehensive study
of the energy demand, energy resources, and the social and envi-
ronmental impact of energy resource utilization; Demandf Supply,
ana Price—a Plan Tor OptimumJSnergy Planning (197^'), and has
testified as an expert witness in numerous rate cases before
regulatory bodies.  Mr. Hurlbut received his BSEE degree in 1962
from Heala College, and his MBA in 1968 from the University of
San Francisco.  In 1973 he completed the NARUC course on Utility
Economics ana Regulation at Michigan State University.  Mr.
Hurlout is a member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic
Engineers (IEEE) ana the National Association of Business Econ-
                            IX-51

-------
                   STATEMENT OF ROY B.  HURLBUT

        My name is Roy B. Hurlbut,  my aaaress is 804 Faymar Drive NE,
Salem, Oregon 97303.  I have been asked by the Iowa Energy Foundation
to review the proposed Iowa ^tate Commerce Commission's draft rules
(Commerce Commission 250 - Chapter 24) for the purpose of any addi-
tions or cnanges to these rules which will be the basis for utility
filing requirements in the State of Iowa.
A.  THE NEED FOR IMPROVED ENERGY PROJECTION
        Faulty forecasting and improper utility plant utilization
are causing the energy consumer to pay higher utility bills.  Study
the forecasts.  First, energy usage has been running below expecta-
tion on a national level.  As electricity usage falls, revenues
decline faster than costs, so utilities wind up with less profit,
or, in some cases, a loss.  Then, the utility must go before the
state regulatory commission to request rate relief.  Second, util-
ities have historically added new plant to meet peak.  This results
in much idle capacity and increased expenses, which means higher
rates for consumers, as well as capital funding problems for util-
ities .
        The first of these dilemmas, i.e., faulty forecasting, can
be resolved to a great extent cy having utility filing Requirements
which give proper definition to each of these categories.
        This information, for the most part, can be found in the
Form 1 and Form 12 utilities submit to the Federal Power Commission.
                             ix-52

-------
          The alleviation of the plant utilization problem can be

  resolvea, to a great extent, with loaa management.  Regulatory

  agencies, such as the Central Vermont  Public Service Corporation

  and the Wisconsin Public Service Commission, have both directed

  that utilities devise rates for electricity at a rate closely
•
  related to the cost of producing and supplying it.

  B.  DEMAND VS. RATES

          One fact that utilities (for the most part) have failed to

  aaaress is the elasticity of demand, and as the consumer pays more

  and more for his energy, he will, out of economic necessity, con-

  sume less.  In the meantime, utilities are sticking to their fore-

  casts, stating the present dip is only a temporary perturbation.

  Large capital budgets, the sine qua non for rate increases, are

  being expanded to meet what utilities assume will be a doubling in

  demand in the next 10 years.  The obvious inequities in pricing

  policies by some state regulators, which place industrial rates

  below average bus bar cost of production, result in the residential

  users subsidizing the industrial customers.

          The need to select the best energy alternatives with the

  least environmental affects should be pursued.

          All of these problems can be lessened to a great extent by

  better planning ana more detailed filings.

          The basic information to be compiled should be:

          1.  The nature and extent of the energy supply situation.

          2.  The projected availability ana cost .:"or different

  types of energy.

          5-  Technical  alternatives available now,  or predictea at

  some future date, and  economic ana environmental impacts on the

  various alternatives.          ix-53

-------
        4.  The effect of existing ana projected safety ana en-
vironmental standards.
        This inquiry should be divided into three phases:
        Phase 1 should be 'summary presentation of anticipated
future energy requirements of Iowa electric and gas consumers,
together with utility plans for meeting these requirements, which
should be made by Doth public and private utilities.  It is
important to note that the impact of elasticity of demand should
be shown in Phase 1.
        Phase 2 should be present and future alternatives, includ-
ing types of present and future energy generation productions
alternatives, and types and cost of fuels available now and in the
future.
        Phase g should be comments of other concerned agencies,
individuals, and groups on the information presented in Phase L.
        In addition to the need for better long-range planning.
is the need to make industry more .efficient.  The large manufac-
turers of electrical machines have not moved fast enough.  Energy
conservation must be a way of life, an ever present life style.
Penalties for over-use should be dispensed with the same dispatch
as a traffic policeman handing out a ticket for speeding.  Off-
peak consumption of power should be encouraged by establishing
ofr-peak rates.  This shift would level the peaks, reducing the
capacity needs of the over-all system.
        The Iowa ^tate Commerce Commission can, and should, take
an active part in trie planning of the over-all energy needs of
the state,,
                              IX-54

-------
                           RESPONSES
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
COMMENT li    We note from Exhibit  1-A-2  that  the  project  is
approximately    one-third   complete.    As   a   result,   many
decisionmaker options have been foreclosed and the utility of  an
environmental  statement  at  this  point  in project development
greatly reduced.  Especially significant is  the  elimination  of
opportunities  to implement the alternatives discussed in Chapter
V with the exception  of  those  mentioned  in  Section  D.    For
example,  further  consideration  of  alternate  plant  sites and
alternatives to a once-through cooling system are precluded.

RESPONSE:     The  on-going   construction   has   limited   many
alternative   options.   However,  in  view  of  the  information
outlined in Chapter I, the  necessity  for  increased  generation
capacity requires the plant to be on line by 1979.  Therefore, in
order  to  meet  power quotas and schedules, construction of Neal
Unit 4 has continued.

COMMENT 2:    The environmental statement should  recognize  that
the  "Browns  Lake   (Bigelow  Park)"  briefly  described  on page
III-105 has received matching assistance from the Land and  Water
Conservation  Fund  for  the  development  of  public  recreation
facilities.  Although it appears that no land will be taken  from
this  park,  the  applicant  should  be  aware  that this area is
subject  (in its entirety) to the provisions of  Section  6(f)  of
the  Land  and  Water  Conservation  Fund  Act, as amended.   This
section of the Act requires that changes  from  the  recreational
use of the land be approved by the Secretary of the Interior.

RESPONSE:     Chapter III of the Final EIS has been  modified  to
include this information.

COMMENT 3:    We suggest that the noise impact on  recreation  on
and  around  Browns  Lake  during  construction be evaluated.  In
addition, the statement should include a non-technical discussion
of the noise impact of plant operation on both  the  Snyder  Bend
and Browns Lake recreation areas.

RESPONSE;     The evaluation of noise impact at Brown's Lake  and
the  Snyder-Winnebago  Recreation  Areas  during the construction
period  is  provided  in  Section  IV-G.   The  location  of  the
recreation  areas with respect to the plant site and the range of
expected noise has been described.

COMMENT jU^    The discussion on  page  IV-92  suggests  that  the
noise  level  in  the Snyder-Winnebago Bends Recreation Area will
                             IX-55

-------
substantially exceed the maximum  noise  level  found  to  permit
residential outdoor enjoyment.   Therefore, the conclusion on page
IV-93  that  plant operation "... should not have a significant
adverse noise impact on the surrounding area" seems unwarranted.

RESPONSE:     The comment is valid and the conclusion in  Chapter
IV  (p.  IV-93) has been changed.  It was based on conservatively
high noise level  estimates  resulting  from  unsilenced  induced
draft  fans.   The applicant has made provisions to install noise
abatement devices for those fans, if, after the plant's operation
has commenced, noise levels are found to be  unacceptable.    Page
IV-93  has  been  changed to read "In conclusion, plant operation
and maintenance activities at Neal Unit 4  may  have  an  adverse
noise  impact  on  the  surrounding  area  due to estimated noise
levels of unsilenced induced draft fans."

COMMENT 5:    The  statement  should  evaluate  impacts  on   the
vegetation,  wildlife,  and  water  quality  in nearby recreation
areas resulting from  atmospheric  emissions.   Where  scientific
knowledge  is  inadequate to make accurate predictions, estimates
should be given based on observations of impacts  resulting  from
emissions from Neal Units 1-3.

RESPONSE:     Impact  evaluation  as  a  result  of   atmospheric
emissions   in  the  Neal  area  has  been  based  on  predictive
methodology utilizing a computerized atmospheric diffusion model.
This model employs plant design and operating parameters for Neal
Units 1-4 and a full year  of  surface  and  ground  level  data.
Calculations  of plant emissions were made for a number of points
within 10 kilometers of the site which includes Brown's Lake  and
Snyder-Winnebago  Bends  Recreation areas.  Using these data, the
expected impacts on vegetation  and  wildlife  are  discussed  in
Section IV-5.

The  effects  of  atmospheric  emissions  on water quality in the
recreation areas will not be adversely affected.  Effects of acid
rain on the pH of the lakes  in  the  vicinity  of  Neal  Unit  4
(Snyder  Bend  and  Brown's  Lake)  should  be minimal due to the
apparent buffering capacity of the lakes, the alkalinity  of  the
soils,  and  the  fact  the  Neal  boiler  stacks  are  the  only
predominant source of SO2 in the vicinity of the site.

COMMENT _6r_    Also,  we  believe  that  the  final  environmental
statement   should  include  a  discussion  and  worst  condition
analysis of the cumulative impact of noise, visual intrusion, and
atmospheric emissions of all four Neal Units and the transmission
line on the continued recreational utility of the Browns Lake and
Snyder-Winnebago recreation areas.

RESPONSE:     Information with respect to the impact significance
to the Brown's Lake  and  Snyder-Winnebago  Recreation  areas  of
                              IX-56

-------
noise, visual intrusion and atmospheric emissions from Neal Units
1-U is included in Sections IV-F and G.

COMMENT 7;    Information presented in the statement  contradicts
the  conclusion  on page V-12 that "the proposed activities would
be compatible with the present land use practice of the area."

EESPONSE:     Neal  Unit  4  is  consistent   with   zoning   and
industrial  development  in  the  Port  Neal Industrial District,
which  is  specifically   zoned   for   heavy   industrial   use.
Information  regarding  other industrial establishments and usage
in the district is provided in Section III-H-3.

COMMENT 8;    Noise, aesthetic, and air quality impacts on nearby
parklands appear to be significant and are  in  need  of  a  more
complete evaluation.

RESPONSE;     Impacts to be incurred in the vicinity  surrounding
the  site  with respect to noise, aesthetics, and air quality are
discussed in Chapter IV, Sections G,  A  and  F,  and  A  and  C,
respectively.

COMMENT 9:    It is unclear from the discussion on  page  III-102
whether  the  cultural  resource  survey undertaken in May, 1973,
included the  proposed  George  Neal  Steam  Electric  Generating
Station,  Unit  U, as well as the proposed Snyder-Winnebago Bends
Recreation Area.  In the event that the 1973  inventory  included
the  Unit  U  project area, the statement should provide detailed
information concerning the inventory  and  analysis  of  cultural
resources  within  the  affected area, including a description of
the survey methods utilized and extent of archeological  testing.
Complete  coverage  of  the  entire project area including access
roads and transmission facilities by a professional  archeologist
is necessary.

RESPONSE^:     Refer  to  response   to   the   State   Historical
Department  of  Iowa.  Monitoring by a qualified professional for
the  occurrence  of  unknown   archeological   resources   during
construction are being arranged by the applicant.

COMMENT JO:   Copies of correspondence with  the  State  Historic
Preservation  Officer   (Mr. Adrian Anderson, Division of Histroic
Preservation, B-13 MacLean Hall, Iowa City, Iowa 52242)  and  the
State  Archeologist  (Dr.  Duane  C.  Anderson,  21 MacLean Hall,
University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa  52242)  should  be  included
within  the  statement.   The  statement  should  further reflect
procedures to be followed should previously unknown archeological
resources be encountered during project development.

RESPONSE:     Refer to comment letter and  response  to  comments
submitted by State Historical Department of Iowa.
                              IX-57

-------
COMMENT 11:    We understand that the best possible  methods  will
be  used  so  that  impingement on aquatic life will be kept at a
minimum.  This is commendable but it is quite  certain  that  the
entrainment  will be of a greater magnitude than that described in
the draft environmental statement.  Species composition of fishes
found  at other Missouri River generating stations do not compare
favorably with data gathered for the George Neal Station.   A fair
-job has been done in qualifying the  fishes  that  will  be  lost
during the once-through cooling process; a poor job has been done
in quantifying these losses.  Numbers of fishes are of little use
for  entrainment  studies  when  these numbers are not correlated
with volumes of water sampled.  The draft environmental statement
should identify the problems of entrainment in a more  definitive
manner  and  describe  what  is  to be done to lessen the impacts
resulting from this type of  cooling  process.   Two  methods  of
mitigating  the  losses could be considered.  One is to limit the
velocities of water withdrawn and a second is to limit the  times
that  the  water  is  withdrawn  both  seasonally  and diurnally.
Potential mitigating measures of this nature should be  discussed
in the final statement.

RESPONSE:     The Final EIS  discusses  a  program  of  study  to
further  evaluate  the  loss  of  larval  fish and the subsequent
impact of this loss on the  aquatic  community  of  the  Missouri
River.   If  this loss is shown to be significant and detrimental
to the aquatic community, the  operational  changes  outlined  in
Section  V-D  of the Final EIS and other measures to minimize the
impacts will be considered.

It is EPA1s position that the  loss  of  larval  fish  and  other
planktonic  organisms via entrainment is primarily related to the
volume of water  used  for  condenser  cooling  and  not  by  the
velocity   of  water  withdrawn.   The  alternative  of  reducing
velocity  to  minimize  entrainment  losses  is  not   considered
beneficial   and,  therefore,  is  not  discussed  in  the  final
statement.

COMMENT J2:    We are concerned that seepage from the ash disposal
area and the coal storage area will contaminate the  groundwater.
Page  V-U4 indicates that linings under the coal storage area and
the solid waste  disposal  area  are  not  considered  necessary.
Likewise the liner for the coal runoff pond will not be installed
at  this time but will be considered later, if necessary.  Little
information is provided in the draft statement to  support  these
decisions.   More  detailed   justification  for  the  conclusions
should be given in the final  statement.

The proper analysis of the impacts  of  leachates  from  the  ash
ponds  should  be  provided.   The  suggested  use  of  data from
existing ash ponds seems appropriate if similar coals  have  been
used  in the existing units;  we believe, however, that data to be


                              IX-58

-------
used should include information on effects on  the  ground  water
beneath  the  existing ash ponds in order to provide a firm basis
for anticipating or predicting effects.  The ground water  impact
analysis  should  also  include  consideration  of  effects  from
infiltration of chemicals  from  the  retention  ponds  A  and  B
discussed on page 11-35.

Monitoring  programs  to determine the impacts on ground water in
the ash disposal and coal storage areas should  be  described  in
the  final  statement  with specific indication of the mitigating
measures the applicant is prepared to implement if  contamination
of the ground water is significant.

RESPONSE:     Possible surface and/or  ground  water  degradation
resulting  from  the coal and ash handling systems is of concern.
The NPDES permit will be conditioned to  assure  compliance  with
the  Safe  Drinking  Water Act, Toxic Substances Act, EPA Qualify
Criteria for Water, and Iowa State Water Quality Standards.

Surface and ground water monitoring will be  implemented  by  the
applicant   and   supervised  by  EPA  to  develop  baseline  and
operational data.

COMMENT 13:   In  the  discussions  on  page  V-43,  we  do   not
understand  the  rationale  of storing the ash and sludge on-site
and alternating layers of waste material with layers of  soil  to
provide  a potential for reclamation of this area "at some future
date." The procedures employed for  potential  reclamation  along
with  any  specific  plans  for  reclaiming  the  area  should be
discussed more fully.

RESPONSE:     The applicant has  informed  us  the  proposed  ash
handling  will  be  similar  to  a  landfill  operation.  Present
technology permits certain types  of  reclamation  of  landfills.
This  reclamation  is  usually  in the form of nonresidential and
nonstructural land uses.  However, in the  event  the  area  will
continue  to be zoned for heavy industry, such reclamation is not
likely.

COMMENT 14:   Water-quality monitoring of  the  river  below  the
proposed   plant   should   be  considered.   This  would  permit
assessment of any adverse effects  resulting  from  the  combined
waste-water  discharges.   The  discussions on pages 111-24 to 27
appear to indicate that no monitoring stations  will  be  located
below Unit U.

RESPONSE:     Thermal plume studies  will  be  conducted  in  the
Missouri  River  downstream  from  Neal Unit U.  In addition, the
applicant  will  be  required  to  conduct  analysis  for   total
suspended  solids,  oil  and  grease  pH  and iron and copper for
various discharges associated with plant operation.  No  chemical


                              IX-59

-------
water quality monitoring programs are planned for water below the
proposed  plant.   Based  on  our  preliminary  review,  chemical
impacts incurred to the river are not expected to be significant.

COMMENT J[5:   No mention is made of the cumulative impacts of the
various generating stations along  the  Missouri  River  although
Section  VII-D  does  mention the cumulative loss of water in the
Missouri River due to this project.   There  are,  for  instance,
fifteen  generating  stations  along  a 360 mile stretch of river
from Sioux City to Kansas City.  Each  plant  is  not  an  entity
apart  from  the  others  when  the same air and the same body of
water are shared.  As future additions  are  made  to  the  power
generating  facilities  in  this  area,  cumulative  impacts will
become increasingly important.   Recognition  of  this  situation
should  appropriately  be  given in the final statement with some
indication of its current significance.

RESPONSE:     We too are concerned about the  cumulative  impacts
of existing and proposed power plants on the aquatic ecosystem of
the  Missouri  River.   The  applicant and other utilities having
plants on the Missouri River have been  and  will  be  conducting
additional   studies  in  the  future  in  attempting  to  assess
recruitment of fish and identify  compensitory  mechanisms  which
may be operating in the Missouri River.  These are key factors in
evaluating the cumulative impacts.

Although  our present knowledge in this area is limited, the data
base established by existing utilities on the river was  used  in
the  development  of the Final EIS.  Along with this information,
various other  entities  involved  with  the  river  system  have
supplied pertinent data relative to cumulative impacts.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE
COMMENT 1:    In the specific area of  "Impact  on  Local  Socio-
economics"  starting  on  page IV-1 it is indicated that the Neal
Unit #4 will have a construction schedule of approximately  3-1/2
years with a projected average construction workforce on the site
of  700  to  a maximum of 1,200 workers.  Further it is estimated
that it will reguire an estimated 100  to  700  workers  with  an
assumed  average  family  size of 3.1 persons relocating to Sioux
City area during various periods of construction.  It is conceded
that not all workers will relocate their families  and  that  the
maximum  population  increase  in  Sioux  Falls  and  vacinity is
expected to be 1.8 percent of the total population.   Based  upon
this,   the   conclusion   is  drawn  that  "construction  worker
immigration should have little, if any adverse impact on  housing
and social services in the area."
                               IX-60

-------
Data  which  is  presented in the document would in part bear out
this conclusion as far as housing is  concerned,  however,   there
does  not  appear  to  be  any  data  presented  as to the  types,
numbers, or case loads of social  services  or  the  numbers  and
types  of  community  facilities  and services, including health,
from which a valid conclusion can be drawn relative to impact  on
"social service".

Demographic  information is presented in the document to show the
ambient state of the  population  in  the  area  effected.    Such
information  and  data  should  also  include  existing community
facilities and services and other community resources  which  are
utilized  by the existing population with discussion in the Final
EIS on the effect that the proposed project has upon the services
rendered.

RESPONSE:     Further study indicates  the  construction  related
impacts  incurred  by  community  facilities  and social services
would not be significant for the following reasons:

    a.   If   the   maximum   number   of    immigrant    workers
    (approximately   700)  were  to  settle  in  the  Sioux  City
    S.M.S.A., the population would increase by only  1.8  percent
    over  the  1974 population.  This is not expected to create a
    significant increase in demand for services.

    b.   Historically, immigrant  workers  do  settle  in  cities
    close  to  the  construction  site.   However,  some  workers
    commute as far as 90 miles every working day.  Therefore, the
    total increase in population in the Sioux City  S.M.S.A.  may
    be less than 1.8 percent.

    c.   The increase in population would occur  over  a  two  or
    three  year  period,  thereby  reducing  further its effects.
    Moreover,  during  the  1975-1980  period,  the  Sioux   City
    S.M.S.A. is expected to have a population growth in excess of
    1  percent  per  year.  Since facilities will be expanding to
    accommodate  this  population  growth   regardless   of   the
    construction  worker population, effects of the latter should
    not reguire further adjustments to  the  S.M.S.A.*s  modified
    services.

    d.   The  construction  worker   population   should   settle
    throughout  the  Sioux  City  area.   Therefore,  no  serious
    impacts  upon  the  facilities  of  any  given  locality  are
    expected.

Based  on the above findings, a detailed analysis of construction
worker impacts on all social services and community facilities in
the Sioux City S.M.S.A. is not warranted.
                              IX-61

-------
COMMENT 2i     Further, there should be some discussion to  assure
that  adequate  drainage  will  be  provided  to borrow areas and
construction sites to reduce or eliminate ponding  of  water  and
thus the enhancement of vector control in the area.

RESPONSE;     There will be no need for borrow  pits  during  the
construction of Neal Unit 4.
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

No response necessary


UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

No response necessary


SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE

No response necessary


FEDERAL AVIATION COMMISSION

No response necessary


FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION

No response necessary


STATE OF NEBRASKA, OFFICE OF PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

No response necessary


STATE OF IOWA, OFFICE FOR PLANNING  AND  PROGRAMMING

No response necessary
                               IX-62

-------
STATE HISTORICAL DEPARTMENT OF IOWA
        J: Reference  to  published  and  unpublished  literature
utilized  in  preparation  of the section is not indicated.  This
makes it difficult to evaluate the accuracy of the section.

Response; References to published and unpublished literature used
in the preparation of Section III-G have been added to the  final
EIS.

Comment 2:  Also  lacking  is  any  indication  that  a  cultural
resources survey was made of the project site.

Response: Although no cultural resources survey was made for  the
site,  the  EIS  presents a summary of information concerning the
known historical  and  archeological  sites  in  the  area.   The
following   agencies   and   organizations   were   contacted  by
Envirosphere Company in 197U and 1976:

    Division of Historic Preservation, Iowa State
      Historical Department, Iowa City, Iowa

    Sioux City Public Museum, Sioux City, Iowa

    Historic Preservation Office of the Nebraska
      State Historic Society, Lincoln, Nebraska

    Dakota County Historical Society, Dakota City,
      Nebraska

The information presented in pages  III-100  to  III-102  of  the
draft  EIS  is  a  complete  summary  of the known historical and
archeological sites in woodbury and Dakota counties  as  obtained
from the above organizations at the time the report was prepared.
These  organizations  have  again  been  contacted  in  order  to
establish whether any additional historic or archeological  sites
have  been  identified.   These  additional  sites identified are
described on page III-102a and III-102b in the final EIS.

Surveys to identify cultural resources were not made  during  the
site   selection   phases   of  Neal  Unit  1.   However,  future
developments in which terrain has not been disturbed will require
complete archeological and historical  surveys.   Any  additional
construction  will be monitored and reviewed according to Section
106 of  the  National  Historic  Preservation  Act  of  1974,  as
Amended.   The  applicant will be expected to coordinate with the
State Historic Preservation Office prior to any new construction.

Comment 3:  Apparently  there  is  a  misunderstanding   of   the
applicability   of   information  provided  from  the  Division's
                         IX-63

-------
inventory.  The Division  has  not  and  does  not  consider  the
available   inventory   data   to  be  sufficiently  complete  to
adequately  represent  the   potentially   significant   cultural
resources  in  this  area.  Nor has the Division ever advised any
agency that such data  obviates  the  need  for  thorough,   well-
planned  and  well- ex ecu ted,  cultural  resources surveys,  nor is
this data intended to be a surrogate of such surveys.

Response; No response necessary

Comment 4 ; The information contained in  Section  III  G-2   does,
however,  represent  that was available, to our knowledge,  at the
time.  It is, however, inadequate.

Response: See response to Comment 2.

Comment 5:  Reference  to  a  "historical,  archaeological,   and
cultural  survey"  (III of page 102) does not pertain directly to
the impact of the above project since it  concerns  the  proposed
Snyder-Winnebago Bends Recreation Areas.
           The  historical,  archeological and cultural survey of
the  Snyder-Winnebago  Bends  Recreational  Areas  conducted   by
Western   Interpretive   Services   was  thought  to  provide  an
indication of the  potential  for  the  location  of  significant
cultural  resources since the area is immediately adjacent to the
Neal Unit U site.

Comment 6; The statement, "No historic,  archeologic  site. ..will
be  adversely  impacted by the transmission facilities", is made.
This should be modified to  read,  "No  (known)   historic  sites,
archeologic   sites. . .will   be   adversely   impacted   by   the
transmi ssion facilities . "

B^sponse: The final EIS has been amended to reflect this change.
Comment_7: No surveys known to us have been made of the  proposed
or  alternate transmission line routes.  There are no known sites
which would be impacted along these  routes  but  this  does  not
obviate  the  need  for  surveys and such should be done prior to
approval.

B§sponse_: When  transmission  line  routes  are  identified,  the
applicant  will  conduct  all  necessary  surveys  to satisfy the
provisions of Section 106  (as stated in response 2) .   Mitigative
measures,  if  necessary,  will  be  implemented  in the event of
aesthetic, historic, or cultural intrusions by the lines.

Comment 8:  Finally,  consideration  should  be  given   to   two
steamboat  wrecks  recorded to have occurred somewhere within two
miles of the transmission facility.  Six  additional  wrecks  are
.reported  to  have  occurred  between  Sioux  City  and Winnebago
Agency .
                              IX-64

-------
Response: No structures or excavations will  interfere  with  the
presently known steamboat wreck sites.
PFFICE_OF_THE_STATE_ARCHEOLOGIST

Comment_J:  Reference is made in the report to the identification
of historic and  archeological  sites  in  the  vicinity  of  the
project   (Chapter III, Section G, 101-102).  However, the sources
for this work are not cited in the bibliography.

Response: Refer to response to Comment 1 of the State  Historical
Department of Iowa.

cpnunent_2:  Further  it  appears  from the discussion of cultural
resources that only a literature search was done of  the  project
area  and  not  a  cultural  resource  reconnaissance  survey.  A
literature search alone is  not  sufficient  for  evaluating  the
potential impact on cultural resources that may be present in the
project area.  Could you please clarify these matters?

Response:  Refer to response to Comment 2 of the State Historical
Department of Iowa.

Comment 3: We would  also  like  written  assurance  that  if  no
cultural  resource field survey has been done, that such a survey
will be conducted with ample lead time prior to the  construction
of the generating station.

Response;  The applicant will be expected to coordinate with your
office prior to any new construction.
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
Cgmment_J: I did not see any reference to the  coal  pile  runoff
area  being  sealed  on the bottom.  Therefore, any material that
filters through the coal pile will certainly move into the ground
water.  The leachate developed as it moves through the coal  pile
has a possibility of containing some of the trace elements listed
in  the  table  in  the  report.   Likewise,  I  did  not see any
reference to the dissolved solids composition of  the  coal  pile
runoff.   I  do  not  know  exactly what this is, but I have read
reports where this concentration can be extremely high.

Response: The NPDES permit will be  conditioned  to  protect  the
underlying  aquifers.   Levels  of  suspended  solids,  dissolved
solids, toxic substances and pH will meet the criteria set  forth
in the following:

    a•   EPA* s Quality Criteria for Water

    b.   Safe Drinking Water Act Standards
                              IX-65

-------
    c.   Toxic Substances Act Standards (to be promulgated  at  a
         later date)

    d.   Iowa State Water Quality Standards

The permit will also be conditioned  to  require  the  applicant,
under  the  supervision  of  EPA, to monitor adjacent surface and
ground water.
        2i The leaching potential of the ash ponds was  discussed
as  a  possibility  and  that  an  analysis would be conducted to
determine this .  I did not see any alternatives listed should the
results show that leaching does occur and that the  ground  water
does  become  contaminated  by the leachate produced from the ash
ponds.  It is important that  a  proper  ground  water  study  be
conducted to determine the potential for contamination from these
ponds and also from the coal pile.

Response:   EPA,   Region   VII,   is   presently   studying  the
effectiveness of other ash disposal  techniques,  including,  but
not limited to the following:

    a.   Locating the ash in an area more hydrologically suitable
         for disposal operations.  Such parameters as  soil  type
         and  grain  size,  level  of  ground  water  table,  and
         proximity to human and  aquatic  life  supporting  water
         sources are being considered.

    b.   Lining the solid  waste  disposal  area  with  synthetic
         material,  clay,  organic peat, or asphalt to prevent or
         minimize leaching.
     CONFEDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATION

Comment 1:     Pages 1-6 of comment letter.

Response;     Since  the  Federal  Power  Commission    (FPC)   is
recognized   as  the  federal  agency  with  the  most  expertise
concerning power demand forecasting, load balancing,  and  energy
conservation  measures,  we  asked  that they respond to comments
relative  to  these  topics.   Attached  is  a  letter  from  FPC
responding  to  your  comments  submitted  to  EPA.  In addition,
please refer to the FPC  comment  letter  of  December  21,  1976
regarding this project.

Comment 2;     In   estimating   air   emissions,   first    order
consideration  is  coal  composition.   In  the EIS, p. II-3, the
presently operating Neal Units 1-3 are described as  using  Hanna
Wyoming  coal  with an average sulfur content of 0.6%.  This coal
created an emission rate of 1.3 Ib/mB which  is  permissible  for
old  sources  but would not be for new sources.  Over on p. IV 56
an inconsistency appears when the typical S content is said to be
0.32%.  This, we presume, is the same Wyoming coal source.   Such
                             IX-66

-------
                      FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION
                             REGIONAL OFFICE
                      31st Floor,  Federal Building
                      230 South Dearborn Street
                      Chicago, Illinois  60604
                                                     January  6,  1977
Mr. Jerome H. Svore
Regional Administrator
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region VII
1735 Baltimore
Kansas City, Missouri  64108

Dear Mr. Svore:

     At your request, we have reviewed the comments  of  the Iowa  Confeder-
ation of Environmental Organizations regarding the need for George Neal
Unit 4 as set out in the Draft Environmental Impact  Statement.

     The Iowa Confederation's comments focus on two  issues, namely, (1)
acceptable load forecasting methodology,  and (2)  deferral  of construction
through conservation measures.  It appears to be  the Confederation's posi-
tion that an econometric technique is the only satisfactory load fore-
casting technique.  While continued progress is being made in terms of
refining forecasting, we believe the 1969 findings of the  Technical Advi-
sory Committee on Load Forecasting Methodology for the  National  Power Sur-
vey are still valid.  In the Committee's  report to the  Federal Power Com-
mission they concluded "... that because of differences  in load charac-
teristics no single method or technique is best for  all utilities,  but
rather each utility must consider its own special conditions and require-
ments in developing or adapting a method  for its  use."   Despite  the many
improvements being made in load forecasting data  and methods,  there is
little that is mechanical in forecasting.  Even the  more sophisticated
techniques do not eliminate the need for  good judgment. Individual tech-
niques may stress demography, economic conditions, or give special  atten-
tion to weather influences.  If such an isolated  factor critically affects
a specific system's load pattern, then such a technique will help in under-
standing the past growth pattern.  However, none  of  these  techniques pro-
vides for certainty in forecasting.  The  accuracy of the forecast is still
dependent on the input the forecaster uses.  The  isolation of the more
important load variables may help concentrate efforts on those areas of
most importance.

     With the above considerations in mind, and without the benifit of
results from an actual econometric analysis of the specific system loads
in question, we cannot conclude that the  methodology used  by the individual
systems in developing the estimates presented in  the MA.RCA data  is  inferior
to an econometric study.
                             IX-67

-------
                                - 2 -

     As noted by the Confederation, conservation in the use of electric
energy has been advocated as one means of reducing demands for electric
power and, thereby, the need for generating facilities.  To date,  most
conservation measures have been voluntary and have been implemented by
public education methods.  The usage of electricity in the U. S. dropped
off markedly after the Middle East oil embargo.  Two main factors  for the
decrease were the recent economic recession in the U.  S.  and energy conser-
vation measures.  However, the influence of conservation has been  very
short-term, and with the effect of the recession removed, the rate of growth
in electricity consumption is rapidly returning to pre-embargo levels.
This would suggest that voluntary conservation in its present form and with
its current effectiveness is unlikely to affect significantly the  future
rate of growth in power demands.

     Rate revision has been advocated as a possible means of accomplishing
conservation.  The extent to which peak load pricing can be economically
justified depends in part on: (1) customers' response to a revised rate
structure, (2) the load characteristics of the system, and (3) the cost
and inconvenience of new metering and billing.

     Demand probably is somewhat responsive to price in the long run (i.e.,
several years), but limited in response during shorter periods. Certain
life styles dependent upon electrical usage may take both time and strong
incentives to change.  Commercial and industrial customers have a  sunk
investment in electric and nonelectric equipment.  Operating existing equip-
ment even at higher electric rates may be less expensive than investing in
more efficient equipment even though it may involve lower operating costs.

     While improved conservation measures such as redesign of rates should
be pursued vigorously, the uncertainties of the effects of specific rate
redesigns and other conservation measures on the load characteristics of
an electric system, the time lag associated with consumer responses, and
the long lead times required for constructing new capacity, severely reduce
the practical potential of rate revision and conservation as alternatives,
at this time, to the construction of additional generating capacity.

     We hope that our discussion will be useful in your consideration of
these questions.
                                             Very truly yours,
                                             Orel E. Haukedahl
                                             Acting Pvegional Engineer
                             IX-68

-------
casual  use  of  analytical  data  is  unacceptable  for  several
reasons.

Response;     The Wyoming coal source for Neal Unit 4, as pointed
out on Page 11-10, is not in the same area as the coal supply for
the existing units.  Whatever coal source is used for  Neal  Unit
4, it must meet new source standards, including those for sulfur.

Comment 3:    Sufficient replicates of coal should be analyzed to
provide a variance and confidence level of analysis.
              The applicant  will  be  required  to  submit  coal
sample  analyses  when a coal source is agreed upon.  Thereafter,
EPA will determine if the sampling techniques  are  adequate  and
the coal meets new source standards, as well as other criteria.
        4:    Variance for sulfur content in Western coals can be
threefold within a seam, on both vertical  and  horizontal  axes.
It  is  possible  for Neal 4 to exceed Federal emission standards
for extended periods when  high  sulfur  areas  are  encountered.
Unless   more   definitive   evidence   is  presented  to  assure
compliance, we urge scrubbers be installed.

Response:     EPA does not have  the  authority  to  require  any
specific  pollution abatement device be installed in Neal Unit 4.
However, the plant must meet all air quality criteria established
for new sources.  A wet scrubber could serve to  reduce  S02  and
particulate  emissions  from  the  stack.   Neal  Unit 4 has been
designed to accommodate a wet scrubber in the event that  one  is
required to meet new source standards.

Comment 5:    The emission of minor constituents released  either
as  a  gas  or  particle  has  not  been treated adequately.  The
toxicity of many of these elements is well known, e.g., the heavy
metals Pb, Cd, As, Se, Hg, etc., and the lighter elements Be  and
F.   The  mass balance of these elements through the plant should
be considered in detail.  Even though these particulate  releases
may  meet  emission  standards,  they add to air shed loads since
they are capable of being  transported  large  distances.   These
incremental  pollutant  loads  added to urban air sheds should be
discussed in relationship to the findings of EPA's CHESS  report.
Such factors also should be considered on a Cost/Benefit basis.
              Coal  analyses  have  not   presently   been   made
available  to  EPA  due  to the applicant's inability to obtain a
contract for  a  coal  supply.   EPA,  Region  VII  is  presently
studying  the  feasibility  and desirability of performing a mass
balance analysis for various trace metals for coal  samples  upon
their  receipt.   If the studies are determined to be worthwhile,
the analyses would be performed by EPA before operation  of  Neal
Unit  4  has  commenced.  In addition, the applicant will perform
stack tests under EPA supervision after plant operation is  under
way.
                            IX-69

-------
Qomment j>!    "°f these minor elements,  fluorine  poses  a  very
great  threat to vegetation.  It is 100 to 1000 times as toxic as
sulfur dioxide and the  sulfur/fluorine  ratio  in  Western  coal
makes   fluorine   a  greater  threat  to  sensitive  native  and
agricultural plant species than sulfur.  The  phytotoxic  effects
of  fluorine  were  discussed  by  Gordon  et al. at the American
Chemical  Society  Symposium  on  Fluorine   Compounds   in   the
Environment, 8/31/76 at San Francisco, California.  (We urge that
direct data on fluorine concentrations in the air and environment
of  George  Neal  units  1-3  be  determined.)  The environmental
sampling program reported by Gordon in  Montana  showed  fluorine
accumulation  and  significant  pathology to native vegetation in
the vicinity of a 180 MW power plant burning Rosebud seam coal, a
"typical" Western low sulfur coal.   The  impact  of  1573 MW  of
George  Neal 1-4, by comparison, approaches an order of magnitude
greater threat."

Response:     Based on whole coal analyses for the  North  Knobs,
Wyoming coal source which will be burned on an interim basis, the
fluorine  constituency  is  80 ppm.   According to the Coal Fired
Power Plant Trace Element Study by EPA,  Region  VIII   (September
1976),  approximately 7.6 percent of the fluorine will be emitted
in the flue gas.  At a  feed  rate  of  about  780,000  lbs./hr.,
fluorine will be emitted at approximately 4.13 lbs./hr.  The coal
to  be  burned in Neal Unit 4 is expected to have a heating value
of 9507 Btu/lb., which means there will  be  approximately  .0006
Ibs.  of  fluorine/mB.   The  new source performance standard for
sulfur is 1.2 Ibs./mB, therefore, this could indicate even  at  a
1000  times  the toxicity of sulfur, the fluorine emissions would
be less than the comparative levels for sulfur.

Comment 7j    It  (the draft EIS) also  attempts  in  the  opening
paragraph to place this serious plant toxin  (sulfur dioxide) in a
favorable light by suggesting a minor and debatable benefit.

Response:     The purpose of the first paragraph of p.  IV-63  is
not  to  place  sulfur  dioxide   (SO2)  in a favorable light, but
rather to define the status of sulfur in terrestrial system.  The
fact that sulfur is an essential  macronutrient   (as  opposed  to
micronutrient) , is an important consideration in an evaluation of
potential  effects  resulting  from changes in the fluxes of this
element through biological communities.

Comment 8:    The conclusion on p. IV 63,  "it  appears  unlikely
that  the  predictable  maximum annual concentrations from George
Neal Units 1-4 will injure flora  of  the  site  and  surrounding
region"  is  made  in  the  face  of  scientific  evidence to the
contrary.

Respgnsej     The statement  referred  to  is  derived  from  the
existing  data  on  long-term  effects of SO2, on vegetation.  An
annual average of 13  ug  SO2/m3  was  noted  in  the   literature
 (during  preparation  of  the EIS), to be the lowest level, which
may possibly be harmful  to  certain  species  of  lichens.   The
                             IX-70

-------
maximum  annual average SO2 concentration expected to result from
operation  of  George  Neal  Units  1-4   is   8   ug/m3.    This
concentration  is  not  expected  to have a significant effect on
either corn or bean production in the surrounding area.

Comment 9:    The sensitivity of economically important crops  in
this  area,  corn  and beans, has been demonstrated in controlled
experiments at SO2 levels well below  even  secondary  standards.
In  1966-67,  the  National  Air Pollution Control Administration
carried out greenhouse studies in Kansas City on sensitive  plant
species  including  corn  and beans.  The experimental plots were
grown in an atmosphere whose SO2 levels during the growing season
were below Federal ambient standards.  Nevertheless, plant growth
was suppressed 25- SOX compared with controls.
              The draft EIS states  (p. IV- 63)   that  exposure  to
the  maximum 3 hour SO2 concentrations predicted for operation of
Units 1-4, could, in combination with environmental factors which
promote plant sensitivity, result in  visible  foliar  injury  to
sensitive  vegetation.   This  conclusion derives from a detailed
comparison  of  predicted  maximum  3  hour  and   1   hour   SO2
concentrations,  with  SO2  dosage  which  are  considered injury
thresholds for sensitive plant  species.   The  threshold  levels
utilized  in  this  comparison are presented in Table 1.  Table 2
presents  comparable  SO2  injury  thresholds   for   plants   of
intermediate sensitivity.

These   threshold   levels  are  estimates  proposed  by  various
researchers as approximate lowest short-term SO2 dosages  capable
of  causing  visible foliar injury.  The values determined by the
National Environmental Research Center  (US EPA) , and derived from
Table V-8 of the Revised Chapter 5 of the  Air  Quality  Criteria
for Sulfur Oxides (EPA, 1973) , are based on the literature, while
those  ascribed  to  Linzon  and  Jones  et al are based on field
observations in Sudbury, Ontario,   (1973)  and  the  southeastern
United  States,  respectively.  The thresholds for visible injury
to sensitive plants exposed for 1 hour to SO2,  range  from  1300
ug/m3  to approximately 7860 ug/m3 .  One-hour thresholds proposed
for plants of intermediate sensitivity range from 2600 to  26,200
ugSO2/m3.  It is important to note that these thresholds refer to
occurrence of visible injury and not necessarily to reductions in
crop yields.

The  threshold SO2 concentrations presented in Tables 1 and 2 may
not apply to ambient atmospheres which contain more than one  air
pollutant, or to field situations where conditions do not promote
plant sensitivity.  Susceptability to S02 injury may be increased
or  decreased  when  plants are simultaneously exposed to S02 and
Nitrogen  Dioxide,  or  S02  and  Ozone  (O3) .   However,   plant
responses to mixtures of SO2 and Nitrogen Dioxide, or S02 and 03,
vary  widely  with  species, environmental conditions, plant age,
and dosage.  The concensus among  leading  investigators  in  the
field  is  that more research is required to identify the effects
of mixtures of ambient air pollutants on threhold dosages of  SO2
                            IX-71

-------
(EPA,  1973;  Jones  et  al,  1974;  Linzon 1973; Severson, 1975;
Tinqey et al., 1973; Heagle  et  al.,  1974).   Heggestad  et  al
(1974)  concluded  that,  "the  current  Federal  Standards (1300
ug/m3/3-hourr 365 ug/m3/24-hours, and 80 ug/m3/yr  for  S02,  and
157   ug/m3/1-hour  for  O3)  should  protect  most  plants  from
synerqistic effects from these two pollutants (SO2 and O3)  in the
field.  Much more  data  on  actual  economic  damage  should  be
obtained  from  ambient  level  field  exposures  to  verify this
statement. "

Environmental  factors,  including  high  light  intensity,  high
humidity, adequate plant moisture, and moderate temperature, tend
to  promote stomatal opening and plant growth.  Consequently, gas
uptake through leaf  stomata  and  plant  susceptability  to  SO2
damage  are  increased  (Thomas, 1961.)  The number of occurrences
of predicted SO2 1-hour concentrations greater than  1300  ug/m3;
are  noted  in  Table  3.   The  1300 ug SO2/m3 level utilized in
constructing Table 3, was  selected  because  it  represents  the
lowest  1-hour threshold dosage noted in Table 1.  Because of the
considerations outlined above, this level can  be  compared  with
SO2  emissions  predicted  from  George Neal Units 1-4, only as a
means to gain perspective on  the  likelihood  of  occurrence  of
veqetation injury.

While  Jones  et  al.  tentatively concluded in 1974 that for SO2
dosaqes, 1 hour, 2 hour and 4 hour limits of 2620, 1572, and 1048
uq/m3 would likely prevent "siqnificant  damage  to  vegetation,"
the  relationship between visible foliar injury and crop yield is
still not well defined.  Bennet and Hill  (1973)  concluded  from
their laboratory investigation of alfalfa and barley responses to
SO2,  that  siqnificant  qrowth  reductions  (due to repression of
photosynthesis)  would not likely result without detectable tissue
necrosis.  In some instances, yields of crops such as alfalfa are
not siqnificantly affected unless  a  minimal  amount  of  foliar
injury  is  exceeded   (Barret  and Benedict, 1970).  For example,
sulfur dioxide injury manifested or tissue necrosis on less  than
5  percent  of  the leaf area of soybean plants, growing near the
Shawnee electric qeneratinq facility  (Kentucky), did  not  affect
soybean  yields  (Jones et al., 1973).  In other studies, however,
radish plants exposed in the laboratory to mixtures  of  SO2  and
O3,  exhibited  decreased  growth  rates with little or no foliar
damage  (Tinqey et al.,  1971).
                           IX-72

-------
                             TABLE  1
             ESTIMATED THRESHOLD SO2 CONCENTRATIONS
          FOR VISIBLE INJURY TO SENSITIVE  PLANT SPECIES
Exposure
Interval
(hr)

1
2
3
4
8
National Environmental
Research Center (1973) 2
uq/m3

1310-7860
655-5240
400- 37501
262-2620
131-1310
Linzon 19732 Jones et al (1974)
uq/m3 uq/m3

1834 1300-2620
1048
7851 786-1572
681
472
*   Interpolated

2   Refers to situations especially  conducive  to plant injury.
                             IX-73

-------
                         TABLE  2
   ESTIMATED THRESHOLD SO2 CONCENTRATIONS FOR VISIBLE
   INJURY TO PLANT SPECIES OF  INTERMEDIATE SENSITIVITY
Exposure
Interval
(hr)

1
2
3
4
8
National Environmental
Research Center (1973) 2 Jones et al (1974)
uq/m3 uq/m3

6550-26,200 2620-5240
3930-19,650
2250-15,5001 1572-2096
1310-13,100
524-6,550
Interpolated
                            IX-74

-------
                             TABLE 3
          MONTHLY FREQUENCY OF PREDICTED 1-HOUR AVERAGE
           SO2 CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 1300 uq/m3
Month

January

February

March

April

May

June

July

Auqust

September

October

November

December
Number of
Occurrences*

      2

      0

      0

      4

      1

      4

     10

      5

      8

      1

      2

      3
Air Quality Study Grid
Points2 at which Predicted
1 hr SO2 Concentrations
Exceed 1300 uq/m3	

157
157, 159

74

1, 2, 74

68, 74, 153, 155, 157
159, 160
157, 159, 160

74, 155, 157, 159, 160

157

157

74, 157
1   See EIS Section IV-C-1 for description of predictive
    methodoloqy.

2   See EIS Exhibit IV-C-1;  Locations of Grid Points for Air
    Quality Study.
                              IX-75

-------
Comment _10:   Serious fumigation episodes at  Mount  Storm,  West
Virginia  in  1972  and Kyger Creek, West Virginia in 1973 caused
extreme foliar damage.  In July of 1971 and  twice  during  1974,
the  plume  of  the  TVA 1970 MW Shawnee plant fumigated at acute
levels affecting 26,400 acres of soybeans in 1971 and  41,800  of
vegetation  in 1974.  EPA representatives made field observations
during these  episodes  and  a  full  description  including  the
potential  for  similar impacts at the George Neal site should be
presented.  In addition, the comments of Dr. Clarence C.  Gordon,
Plant   Pathologist,   University   of   Montana,  Missoula,  who
investigates and reported on these episodes, should be sought.

Response:     Care  must  be  exercised  in  extrapolating  field
observation  recorded  under one set of conditions to other field
situations  where  different   environmental   factors   may   be
prevalent.   Symptoms  typical  of  SO2  injury  were observed on
conifers exposed to emissions from the Mount Storm  Power  Plant,
in  Maryland,  West  Virginia.  These conifers may also have been
subjected  to  relatively  high  (compared  to  average  nonurban
levels)  particulate  deposition and above standard O3 levels (US
EPA, 1971).  In  addition  to  symptoms  typical  of  SO2  injury
(perhaps  in  conjunction with O3), the conifers exhibited growth
aberrations  (such as long-short needle syndrome and  adventitious
budding)   for  which  no  casual  agent  (or  agents)  could  be
identified.   Gordon   (1972)  and  Hindawi  and   Ratsch    (1974)
postulated  that  particulate  deposition may have caused some of
the  observed  growth  aberrations.   Gordon   simulated,   under
laboratory  conditions, some of the observed symptons by repeated
application  of  fly-ash  slurry   to   conifer   needles.    The
applicability  of  these  laboratory studies to field conditions,
however, has not been  adeguately  demonstrated.   Investigations
conducted  by  FA  Wood (1976) suggest that a "biological entity"
may have been responsible  for  the  long-short  needle  syndrome
observed  on  Scotch pine.  The 1971 fumigation episode occurring
in the vicinity of the Shawnee Steam Plant,  Kentucky   (Jones  et
al.,    1973)   was  referred  to  in  response  to  the  previous
interrogatory.  The EPA investigation of  the  episode  concluded
that  "foliar  SO2 -  injury  had no detectable effect on soybean
production." However, a 1975 SO2  episode  at  this  station  did
result  in  a  "significant  economic  loss"  to  persons raising
tobacco, soybeans, red clover,  and  home  gardens   (EPA,   1976) .
This damage was associated with maximum 3 hour SO2 concentrations
of  1716-2197  ug/m3.  The maximum 3 hour concentration predicted
for George Neal Units  1-4 is 1153 ug/m3.

Comment 11:   The section on acid rain  (EIS, p. IV-67) is a vague
and incomplete description of the scientific knowledge  and   true
impacts  of  acid  rain.  Since 1952, European investigators  have
carried out precipitation chemistry  studies  throughout  western
Europe.  These studies, which are reported in over 100 scientific
articles,  demonstrate  rather  vividly  that acid rain primarily
caused by atmospheric emissions of  the  industries  of  Germany,
France,  and  England  have  caused in the past and are currently
causing  a  serious  impact  upon  the  aquatic  and  terrestrial
                            IX-76

-------
ecosystems  of Norway and Sweden.  A condensed version of what is
currently known  about  acid  precipitation  and  its  effect  on
ecosystems  can  be  found  in a 1976 USDA 1,074-page publication
(Technical Report NE-23) , "Proceedings of the First International
Symposium on Acid Precipitation and the Forest Ecosystem." It  is
imperative  that  the  EIS  writers  obtain  this publication and
attempt to relate the known data to the  potential  S02  and  NO2
emission to be released from stacks of George Neal Units 1-4.

Response;     The publication referred to was  not  available  at
the  time of preparation of the draft EIS.  Preliminary review of
this publication does not indicate a need to alter the concluding
paragraph of the section  entitled  "Effects  of  Acid  Rain  and
Sulfate Deposition on Vegetation."
        .12:   The National Environmental Research  Laboratory  of
EPA  has been conducting Zonal Air Pollution research with SO2 at
their Montana study site.  Results of  these  studies  should  be
obtained  and  the  data,  where  possible,  used  in  evaluating
vegetative impacts at the George Neal site.

Response;     The data  currently  available  from  the  National
Environmental  Research  Laboratory's  investigation conducted at
Colstrip, Montana (Lewis et al. , 1976), are generally of  a  base
line nature, and not presently suitable for predictive purposes.
                            IX-77

-------

-------
                        LITERATURE CITED
US   Environmental   Protection  Agency,  National  Environmental
Research Center, 1973.  Effects of sulfur oxide in the atmosphere
on vegetation; revised Chapter 5 for  Air  Quality  Criteria  for
Sulfur Oxide NIIS PB 226 314, 43 p.

Linzon,  NS,  1973.   Sulfur  Dioxide  Air  Quality Standards for
Vegetation.  Paper  No.  73-107  presented  at  the  66th  Annual
Meeting  of  the Air Pollution Control Association, Chicago, June
24-28, 1973.  Air  Pollution  Control  Association  (Pittsburgh),
19p.

Jones,  HC,  Weber, D., and D Balsillie, 1974.  Acceptable limits
for air pollution dosage and vegetation effects:  Sulfur  Dioxide
Paper No. 74-225 presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of, the Air
Pollution  Control  Association,  Denver  June  9-13,  1974.  Air
Pollution Control Association (Pittsburgh), 31 p.
Thomas, MD. 1961.  Effects of air pollution  on  plants,  in
pollution. World Health Monograph Series No. 46, pg 233-278.
axr
Severson,  J. G., Jr., 1975.  Sulfur and Higher Plants, Sulfur in
the Environment, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis pp. 92-111.

Tingey, D.T., R. A. Reinert, J. A. Dunning, and W. W. Heck  1973.
Foliar  Injury  Responses of Eleven Plant Species to Ozone/Sulfur
Dioxide Mixtures.  Atmospheric Environment 7:201-208.

Heagle, A. S., Body, D. E. and G.  E.  Neely  1974.   Injury  and
yield  responses  of soybean to chronic doses of ozone and sulfur
dioxide in the field.  Phytopathology 64:132-136.

Heggested, H.  E.,  Anderson,  C.  E.,  and  W.  A.  Feder  1974.
Determining  acceptable  limits  for  air  pollution  dosages and
vegetation effects: Ozone.  Paper No.  74-224  presented  at  the
17th  Annual  Meeting  of  the  Air Pollution Control Association
(Pittsburgh) , 37 p.

Bennet, H. H., and A.  C.  Hill  1973.   Inhibition  of  Apparent
Photosynthesis  by  Air  Pollutants.   Journal  of  Environmental
Quality 2 (4): 526-530.

Barret, T. W., and H. M.  Benedict. 1970.  Sulfur Dioxide,  in  J.
Jacobson and A. Hill  (Edit.), Recognition of Air Pollution Injury
to Vegetation.  Air Pollution Control Association  (Pittsburgh), p
C1-C17.

Jones,  H.  C., Cunningham, J. R., McLaughlin, S. B., Lee, N. T.,
and S. S. Ray. 1973.   Investigation  of  Alleged  Air  Pollution
Effects on Yield of Soybeans in the Vicinity of the Shawnee Steam
Plant.   Tennessee  Valley  Authority,  Division of Environmental
Planning, Chattanooga, Term.
                             IX-79

-------
                    LITEEATURE CITED (Cont'd)


Tingey, D. T., Heck, W. W. , and R. A. Reinert., 1971.  Effect  of
Low Concentration Ozone and Sulfur Dioxide on Foliage, Growth and
Yield  Radish.   Journal of the American Society of Horticultural
Science 96(3): 369-371.

US Environmental Protection Agency, 1971.  In Mount  Storm,  West
Virginia-Gorman,   Maryland,  and  Luke,  Maryland-Keyser,  West,
Virginia, Air Pollution Abatement Activity.  NTIS pB 199181, p.

Gordon, C. C., 1972.  Mount Storm Study.  Unpublished  Manuscript
Submitted  to  US  Environmental  Protection Agency, November 17,
1972.  EPA Contract No. 68-02, 0229, 31 pp.

Hindawi, A. J., and H. C. Ratsch, 1974.  Growth abnormalities  of
Pollution  74-252 presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Air
Pollution Control Association, Denver, Colorado, June 9-13, 1974.
Air Pollution Control Association (Pittsburgh) , 21 p.

US Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV,  Air  Surveillance
Branch,  1976.   Investigation  of Reported SO2 Fumigation in the
Vicinity of the Tennessee Valley Authority Shawnee Steam Plant.

Lewis, R. A., Glass, N. R. and A. S. Lefohn  (edts.),  1976.   The
Bioenvironmental  Impact  of  a Coal-Fired Power Plant.  National
Ecoological Research  Laboratory,  Corwallis,  Oregon.   NTIS  PB
252177, 313 p.
                             IX-80

-------
                           REFERENCES
                        III - A - GEOLOGY

III-A-1    Schumm,  SA  1971.   Fluvial   Geomorphology   Channel
           Adjustment  and  River  Mechanics.   HW  Shen  ed.. Ft
           Collins, Co.

III-A-2    Worster, JR et al  (1972).   Soil  Survey  of  Woodbury
           Co., Iowa. US Dept of Ag. Soil Cons. Service, p 87.

III-A-3    National  Oceanic   and   Atmospheric   Administration
           (NOAA).  1973.  Earthquake History of the US.


                       Ill - B - HYDROLOGY

III-B-1    Russell, TR.  1965.  Age, growth, and food  habits  of
           the  channel  catfish  in  unchanneled  and  channeled
           portions  of  the  Missouri  River,   Nebraska,   with
           emphasis  on  limnological  observations.   MA Thesis,
           Univ of Mo. (unpub).

III-B-2    Morris, LA, RN Langemeier, TR Russell and A Witt,  Jr.
           1968.    Effects   of   main   stem  impoundments  and
           channelization upon  the  limnology  of  the  Missouri
           River,  Nebraska.   Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 97  (4); 380-
           388.

III-B-3    Holz, DD. 1969.   The Ecology of the unchannelized  and
           channelized Missouri River, Nebraska, with emphasis on
           the  life history of the flathead catfish.  MA Thesis,
           Univ of Mo. (unpub) .

III-B-4    Ebasco Services, Inc., 1975: Thermal Plume Analysis of
           the George Neal Electric Generating Station,  prepared
           for Iowa Public Service Company, 21pp.

III-B-5    US Army Corps of  Engineers,  August  1973.   Missouri
           River  Main  Stem  Reservoirs  -  1973-1974  -  Annual
           Operating Plan.

III-B-6    US ARMY Corps of Engineers, 1971.  Freeze and  Breakup
           Missouri   River-Sioux  CjLty^  Iowa  to  Kansas  City,
           Missouri.

III-B-7    United  States  Department  of   Interior   Geological
           Survey.  Water Resources Data for Iowa.

III-B-8    Gumbel, EJ, Statistical Theory of  Draughts,  Proc  Am
           Soc  Civil  Engineers,  Vol 80, Sep. No. 439, pp 1-19,
           May 1954.
                                R-l

-------
III-B-9    Weibull, W, A Statistical Theory of  the  Strength  of
           Materials, Ing. Vetenskap Akad Math Ser 22, 1953.

III-B-10   Ebasco Services Inc., 1971, Effect  of  Cooling  Water
           Discharge  on  the  Temperature  Distribution  of  the
           Missouri River, prepared for the Iowa  Public  Service
           Company, 10pp.

III-B-11   Ebasco Services Inc., 1974, George Neal Steam Electric
           Station,  Temperature  Prediction   and   Hydrogr aphi c
           Analyses,   prepared   for  the  Iowa  Public  Service
           Company, 20pp.

III-B-12   Iowa Geologic Survey, 1974.  Computer  files  of  well
           data.

III-B-13   Cipperley,  CE  1974.   Woodbury  County   Sanitarian.
           Personal Communication.
           Ill - C - WATER QUALITY AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY

III-C-1    Russell, TR 1965.   Age, growth, and food habits of the
           channel catfish in unchanneled and channeled  portions
           of  the  Missouri   River,  Nebraska,  with emphasis on
           limnological observations.  MA  Thesis,  Univ  of  Mo.
           (unpub) .

III-C-2    Morris, LA, RN Langemeir, TR Russel, and  A  Witt  Jr.
           1968.    Effect   of   main   stem   impoundments  and
           channelization upon  the  limnology  of  the  Missouri
           River,  Nebraska.    Trans. Am^ Fish. Soc. 97 (4) ; 308-
           388.

III-C-3    Funk, JL and CE Ruhr. 1971.  Steam  Channelization  in
           the  Midwest.   In:  E  Schnelberger and JL Funk, eds.
           Stream Channelization - A Symposium.   N  Cent.  Div.,
           Am. Fish Soc., Spec. Pub No. 2 - (pp 5-11).

III-C-4    Conover, M. 1973.   Missouri River and associated water
           fishery resources.  Present and potential.   Iowa Cons.
           Comm. Proj. No. 73-1-C-2B, Mimeo.

III-C-5    US Environmental Protection  Agency.  1971.   Everyone
           Can't  Live  Upstream  - A Contemporary History of the
           Water Quality Problems on the Missouri  River.  Office
           of Water Programs, Kansas City, Mo.

III-C-6    Tabak, HH and RL Bunch. 1970.   Missouri  River  Basic
           sterol  assay project report - coprostanol, a positive
           marker of domestic and run-off pollution.  USDI, FWQA,
           Adv. Waste, Trt. Res. Lab., Cinn.,  Ohio.   In:  USEPA
           1971.   Everyone  Can't Live Upstream. Office of Water
           Programs, Kansas City, Mo. pp252-268.
                                R-2

-------
III-C-7    Gould,  G  and  J  Smulbach.  1973.    Final   Report.
           Missouri   River   Environmental  Inventory:  Relative
           Abundance and Distribution of Fishes in  the  Missouri
           River.  1972-73.

III-O8    Barstow,  CJ.   1971.   Impact  of  channelization   on
           wetland   habitat  in  the  Obion-Forked  Deer  Basin,
           Tennessee.  In: Schneberger, E and JL Funk, eds. 1971.
           Stream Channelization - A Symposium.  Am. Fish.  Soc. r
           Spec. Pub. No.  2  (pp 20-29) .

III-C-9    Congdon, JC 1971.  Fish populations of channelized and
           unchannelized   sections   of   the   Chariton   River,
           Missouri.   In:  E  Schneberger,  E, and JL Funk, eds.
           Stream Channelization - A Symposium.   N  Cent.  Div. ,
           Am. Fish. Soc. , Spec. Pub. No. 2  (pp 52-62) .

III-C-10   Funk, JL 1970.  Warm water streams.  In:  N.  Bension,
           ed.   A  Century  of  Fisheries in North America.  Am.
           Fish. Soc. , Sgec^ Pub. No. 7 (pp  141-152) .
III-C-11   Spinner, J. 1973-1976 Commercial  Fisheries  Statistics.
           Iowa Cons. Comm.

III-C-12   APJA, AWWA and WPCF 1971.  Standard  Methods  for  the
           Examination  of  Water  and  Wastewater. 13th Edition.
           Amer. Pub. Health Assoc., Inc., N.Y.

III-C-13   Baldwin, K and J Hey.  1973.   Aguatic  Ecology  Study
           (Pre-operational  Survey)  of  the Missouri River near
           the George Neal Station Sioux City^ Igwa t July 1971  -
           June 1972. Prepared for Iowa Public Service Co. 90p.

III-C-14   Hey, J and K Baldwin, 1974a.   Aguatic  Ecology  Study
           (Post-operational  Survey,  Neal  II)  of the Missouri
           River near the George Neal Station Sioux  City,  Iowa,
           July 1JT72 " May 1973. Prepared for Iowa Public Service
           Co. 108 p.

III-C-15   Hey, J and K Baldwin, 1974b.  Missouri  River  Aguatic
           Ecology Study Report, March - May 1974. Prog. Rept. to
           Iowa Public Service Co. 76p.

III-C-16   Hynes, HBN 1972.  The Ecology of Running Waters.  Univ
           of Toronto Press, Can. 555p.

III-C-17   Hey J. and K. Baldwin  1975.   Aguatic  Ecology  Study
           (Pre-operational  Survey,  Unit  III)  of the Missouri
           River near The George Neal Station, Sioux City, Iowa -
           June 1974 - December 1975.
                                R-3

-------
III-C-18   Hey, J. and K. Baldwin. 1974.  Aquatic  Ecology  Study
           (Pre-operational  survey,  Neal  II)   of  the Missouri
           River near the George Neal Station Sioux City, Iowa
           May  1973 - May 1974. Prepared for Iowa Public Service
           Company.

III-C-19   Green,  CL.  1973.   A  Creel  Census  survey  of  the
           Missouri  River  Sport  Fishery.   MA Thesis, Univ. of
           South Dakota. 126p.

III-C-20   Gudmundson, BJR 1972.  Plankton algae of the upper Des
           Moines River, lona.  Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 79: 1-6.

III-C-21   US   Atomic   Energy   Commission.    1973b.     Final
           Environmenta1 Statement Related to Operation of Cooper
           Nuclear  Station.   Neb.  Public Power Dist. Docket No.
           50-298.

III-C-22   US   Atomic   Energy   Commission.    1973c.     Final
           Environmental  statement Related to Operation of Duane
           Arnold Energy Center.

III-C-23   FWPCA. 1968.  Water Quality  Criteria.  Rept.  of  the
           Nat'l  Tech.  Adv. Comm. to the Sc't of the Int. April
           1968.

III-C-24   Sanders, HL. 1960.  Benthic Studies in  Buzzards  Bay.
           III.   The  structure  of  the  soft bottom community.
           Limnol and Oceanog. 5: 130-153.

III-C-25   Swartz,   RC.   1972.     Biological    criteria    of
           environmental  change  in  Chesapeake Bay.  Ches. Sci.
           J_3: 517-511.

III-C-26   Gower, JC. 1971.  A general coefficient of  similarity
           and some of its properties.  Biometrics 27; 857-874.

III-C-27   Brown,  SD.  1969.   Grouping  plankton   samples   by
           numerical analysis.  Hydrobiologia 33(3-4|; 289-301.

III-C-28   Cairns, J Jr., and RL Kaesler. 1971.  Cluster analysis
           of Potomac River survey stations  based  on  protozoan
           presence - absence data.  Hydrobiologia 34 _13_-4J_: 414-
           432.

III-C-29   Cairns, J Jr., and RL Kaesler. 1971.  Cluster analysis
           of fish in a  portion  of  the  upper  Potomac  River.
           Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 100  (4) ; 750-756.

III-C-30   Weber, CI.  1971.    Biological  field  and  laboratory
           methods  for  measuring  the quality of surface waters
           and effluents.  Enyir. Mpn. Ser., USEPA, July, 1973.
                                R-4

-------
III-C-31   Cummins, KW. 1972.  What  is  a  river?  -  zoological
           description.   In:  Oglesby,  TT,  CA  Carlson, and JA
           McCann, eds.  River Ecology and Man. Acad. Press.,  NY
           pp 33-47.

III-C-32   Hansen, DR. 1971.  Stream  channelization  effects  on
           fishes  and  bottom  fauna  in the Little Sioux River,
           Iowa.  In: Schneberger, E and JL  Funk,  eds.   Stream
           Channelization - A Symposium.  N Cent. Div., Am. Fish.
           Soc. , Spec. Pub. No. 2  (pp 29-51).

III-C-33   Holz, DD 1969.  The Ecology of the  unchannelized  and
           channelized Missouri River, Nebraska, with emphasis on
           the  life history of the flathead catfish.  MA Thesis,
           Univ of Mo. (unpub) .

III-C-34   Beak, TC, C Griffing, and AG  Appleby  1973.   Use  of
           artificial   substrate   samplers   to   assess  water
           pollution.  In: Cairns, J  Jr  and  KL  Dickson,  eds.
           Biological   Methods   for  the  Assessment  of  Water
           Quality. Amer. Soc. Testing  and  Materials.   Phila.,
           Pa. pp 227-241.

III-C-35   Gaufin, AR 1973.  Use of aquatic invertebrates in  the
           assessment of water quality.  In: Cairns, J Jr, and KC
           Dickson,  eds.   Biological Methods for the Assessment
           of Water Quality. Amer. Soc.  Testing  and  Materials.
           Phila., Pa. pp 96-116.

III-C-36   Mackenthun,  KM  and  WM  Ingram   1968.    Biological
           Associated  Problems  in  Freshwater  Envi ronments. US
           Fed. Wat. Poll. Cont. Admin. 287 p.

III-C-37   Nebeker, AV and EA Lempke 1968.   Preliminary  studies
           on  the tolerance of aquatic insects to heated waters.
           J Kans. Ent. Soc. 41; 413-418.

III-C-38   Walburg, CH 1971.  Loss of  young  fish  in  reservoir
           discharge  and  year  class  survival, Lewis and Clark
           Lake, Missouri River.  In:  Hall,  G,  ed.   Reservoir
           Fisheries  and  Limnology.  Am. Fish. Soc.r Spec. Pub.
           No. 8 (pp 441-448)

III-C-39   Harrison,  HM,  1953.   Returns  from  tagged  channel
           catfish  in  the  Des  Moines River, Iowa. Proc. Iowa.
           Acad. Sci. 60: 635-644.

III-C-40   Welker, B 1967.  Movements of marked  channel  catfish
           in the Little Sioux River Iowa.  Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.
           36 (3); 351-353.

III-C-41   Mayhew,   J   1971.    Intra-stream    movement    and
           distribution of channel catfish.  Pro. Iowa Acad. Sci.
           78(1) ;  30-33.
                                R-5

-------
III-C-42   Gammon, JR 1973.  The effect of thermal inputs on  the
           populations  of  fish  and  macroinvertebrates  in the
           Wabash  River.   Purdue  Univ.  Water  Res.  Ctr.,   W
           Lafayette, Ind. Tech Rept. No. 32.

III-C-43   Cramer, JD and GR Marzolf, 1970.  Selective  predation
           of zooplankton by gizzard shad.  Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.
           IE (2) : 320-332.

III-C-44   Bonneau, DL, JW McGuire, OW  Tiemeier,  and  CW  Deyoe
           1972.   Food habits and growth of channel catfish fry,
           Ictalurus punctatus.  Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.  101   (ft).;
           613-618.

III-C-45   Buchholz, M 1957.  Age and growth of river  carpsucker
           in  the Des Moines River, Iowa. Proc. Iowa. Acad. Sci.
           £4: 589-600.

III-C-46   Calhoun, Alex, ed. 1966.  Inland Fisheries Management.
           Cal.  Dept. Fish and Game. 546 p.

III-C-47   Carlander, KD 1969.  Handbook  of  Freshwater  Fishery
           Biology,  Vol.  1. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa.
           751 p.

III-C-48   Carlson,  CA  1968.   Summer  bottom  fauna   of   the
           Mississippi   River,   above  Dam  19,  Keokuk,  Iowa.
           Ecology 4£ (1); 162-169.

III-C-49   Jester,  DB  1972.    Life   history,   ecology,   and
           management  of  the river carpsucker, Carpiodes carpio
           (Rafinesque) .  With reference to Elephant Butte  Lake.
           New Mexico State Univ., Ag. Exp. St., Res. Rept. 243.

III-C-50   Jude, David  J  1973.   Food  and  feeding  habits  of
           gizzard  shad  in  Pool  19, Mississippi River. Trans.
           Amer. Fish. Soc. 102 (2); 378-383.

III-C-51   Lagler, KF 1956.  Freshwater  Fishery  Biology.  Wm  C
           Brown Co., Dubuque, Iowa 421 p.

III-C-52   McComish,  TS  1967.   Food  habits  of  bigmouth  and
           smallmouth  buffalo  in  Lewis  and Clark Lake and the
           Missouri River.  Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 96  (1) ; 70-74.

III-C-53   Minckley, WL, JE Johnson, JN Rinne, and SE Willoughby.
           1970.  Food of Buffalofish, genus Ictiobus, in central
           Arizona reservoirs.  Trans. Am. Fish Soc. 9JJ  (2); 333-
           342.

III-C-54   Nelson, WR 1968.  Reproduction and early life  histoi-y
           of  sauger, Stizostedion canadense, in Lewis and Clark
           Lake.  Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 97  (2); 159-166.
                                R-6

-------
III-C-55   Pennak, RW 1953.   Fresh-Water  Invertebrates  of  the
           United States. The Ronald Press Co., NY. 769 p.

III-C-56   Platt, WJ 1973.  Comparison of vertebrate  communities
           of  Coralville  Reservoir and Cone Marsh, Iowa.  Proc.
           Iowa Acad. Sci. 80 (3): 117-128.

III-C-57   Swedberg DV 1968.  Food and growth of  the  freshwater
           drum  in  Lewis  and Clark Lake, South Dakota.  Trans.
           Am. Fish. Soc. 97  (4): 442-447.


                      Ill - D - METEOROLOGY

III-D-1    US  Weather  Bureau   1963.   Maximum  Recorded  United
           States Point Rainfall.

III-D-2    US Department  of  Commerce  1967.   Climates  of  the
           States, "The Climate of Iowa".

III-D-3    US Army Quartermaster Research and Engineering  Center
           1959.     Glaze-Its   Meteorology   and   Climatology,
           Geographic   Distribution   and   Economic    Effects,
           Technical Report EP-105.

III-D-4    Thorn. 1963.  Tornado  Probabilities,  Monthly  Weather
           Review, October - December.

III-D-5    Pasquill, F 1961.  "The Estimation of  the  Dispersion
           of  Windborne Material," Meteorological Magazine, Vol.
           9>0.

III-D-6    Turner, DB 1961.  Relationships Between  24-hour  Mean
           Air Quality Measurements and Meteorological Factors in
           Nashville,    Tennessee.     Appendix:   A   Stability
           Classification  Using  Hourly  Airport   Observations.
           Journal  of  the  Air  Pollution  Control Association,
           2(10).

III-D-7    The American Society of  Mechanical  Engineers,  1958.
           Recommended Guide for the Prediction of the Dispersion
           of Airborne Effluents.

III-D-8    American Meteorological  Society  1968.   Glossary  of
           Terms Frequently Used in Air Pollution.

III-D-9    Holzworth,  GC  1970.   Meteorological  Potential  for
           Urban  Air  Pollution in the Contiguous United States.
           Second International Clean Air Congress.

III-D-10   Holzworth, GC 1964.  Estimates of Mean Maximum  Mixing
           Depth   in  the  Contiguous  United  States.   Monthly
           Weather Review, 92 (5) .
                                R-7

-------
III-D-11   Hosier, CD 1961.   Low Level Inversion Frequency in the
           Contiguous United States.   Monthly weather Review.

III-D-12   Thorn, HCS 1968.  New Distribution of Extreme Winds  in
           the   US.    Journal   of   the  Structural  Division,
           Proceedings  of  the   American   Soci ety   of   Civil
           Engineering, July.
                  Ill - F - TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY

III-F-1    Kuchler, AW 1964.   Potential Natural Vegetation of the
           Coterminous  United  States.   American   Geographical
           Society, Special Publication No.  36.

III-F-2    Weaver, JE 1960.  Floodplain vegetation of the central
           Missouri valley and contacts of woodland with prairie.
           Ecological Monographs 30: 37-64.
III-F-3
III-F-4
III-F-5
III-F-6
III-F-7
III-F-8
1965. Native Vegetation
University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
Walter, H 1973. Vegetation of the Earth
Wieser) . Springer-Verlag, NY.
Iowa Forest Industries Committee 1968.
Facts. Dubugue, Iowa.
Iowa Public Service 1971. George Neal 3
Report.
Baldwin, K 1974. Briar Cliff College,
Iowa. Personal communication.
Office of Endangered Species and
of Nebraska.
(Transl. by J
Iowa Forest
Environmental
Sioux City,
International
           Activities,  Bureau  of  Sport Fisheries and Wildlife,
           United  States  Department  of  the   Interior   1973.
           Threatened Wildlife of the United States.

III-F-9    Kakae, KR 1974.   Superintendent, Conservation  Officer
           Section,   Iowa   Conservation  Commission.   Personal
           communication.

III-F-10   United States Army Engineer District, Omaha,  Nebraska
           1973.    Missouri   River  Recreation  Lakes,  Snyder-
           Winnebago Complex.  Final Environmental Statement.

III-F-11   National Audubon Society  1974.   The  Blue  List  for
           1975.  American Birds 28 ^6_: 971-974.
III-F-12   Heiser, N 1974 and 1976.  woodbury  District  Wildlife
           Biologist.  Personal communication.
                                R-8

-------
III-F-13
III- F- 14
III- P- 15
III-F-16
III- F- 17
III- F- 18
III-F-19
III-F-20
III-F-21
Martin. AC. HS Zim, and AI Nelson 1951. American
Wildlife and Plants, A Guide to Wildlife Food Habit.
Carpenter, JR 1940. The Grassland Biome. Ecological
Monographs 10 (4) ; 617-684.
Conant, R. 1958. A Field Guide to Reptiles and
Amphibians. Houghton~Mif flin Company, Boston.
Burt, WH and RP Grossenheider. 1964. A Field Guide to
the Mammals. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
Brown, WH. 1971. An annotated list of the birds of
Iowa. Iowa State Journal of Science 45(3): 387-469.
Fernald, ML. 1950. Gray's Manual of Botany. D Van
Nostrand Company, NY.
Both, J. 1976. Iowa State Conservation Officer.
Personal communication .
Harrell, B. 1976. University of South Dakota,
Vermillion, south Dakota. Personal communication.
Robbins, CS, Brunn, B, and HS Zim. 1966. Birds of
North America . Golden Press, NY 340 pp.
       Ill - G - HISTORIC, SCENIC, AND RECREATIONAL SITES

III-G-1    U.S.   Army   Corps   of   Fjigineers   1973.     Final
           Envi ronmen ta1    Statement,   Snyder-Winnebego   Bends
           Recreational Areas. Omaha, Nebraska.

III-G-2    Bowers, M. 1976.  Divisipn of  Historic  Preservation,
           Iowa  State  Historical  Department,  Iowa City, Iowa.
           Personal Communication.

III-G-3    Taxer, S. 1976.   Sioux  City  Public  Museum.   Sioux
           City, Iowa.  Personal Conimunication.

III-G-4    National Park Service.  National Register of  Historic
           Places    (Including   National   Historic  Landmarks).
           Federal  Register.  National  Archives   and   Records
           Service.  Washington, E.G.

III-G-5    Munn, B. 1976.  Historic Preservation Office, Nebraska
           State Historic Society.  Lincoln, Nebraska.   Personal
           Communication.

III-G-6    Culbertson,  P.  1976.    Dakota   County   Historical
           Society.     Dakota    City,    Nebraska.     Personal
           Communication.
                              R-9

-------
                      IV - A - CONSTRUCTION

IV-A-1     US Bureau of the Census, 1970  Census  of  Population,
           General  Social  and Economic Characteristics for Iowa
           and Nebraska, Table 123.

IV-A-2     Seaton, C. 1976.  Iowa Employment Security Commission.
           Personal communication.

IV-A-3     US Bureau of the Census, 1970  Census  of  Population,
           General  Population  Characteristics,  Iowa, Table 16.
           (Average household size for Sioux City SMSA)

IV-A-4     Davis,  DE  and  FB  Golley.  1965.    Principals   in
           Mammalogy.  Van  Nostrand  Reinhold Company, New York.
           335 p.

IV-A-5     Hot,  JM.  1976.   Iowa  State  Conservation  Officer.
           Personal communication.

IV-A-6     Yoakum, J and WP Dasmann. 1969.  Habitat  manipulation
           practices.   In:  Wildlife  Management  Techniques. RH
           Giles, ed.  The Wildlife Society, Washington, D.C.  pp
           173-231.

IV-A-7     US Environmental Protection Agency. 1971.  Effects  of
           Noise  on  Wildlife  and  Other Animals. Memphis State
           University, Document NTID 300.5.  74pp.


IV-A-8     US Environmental Protection Agency. 1973.  Effects  of
           Noise on Wildlife and Other Animals. Public Health and
           Welfare Criteria for Noise, July 27, 1973.

IV-A-9     Haindfeld, M 1976.  Snyder Bend County  Park  Officer.
           Personal communication.

IV-A-10    McKee, JE and HW Wolf. 1973.  Water Quality  Criteria,
           2nd  ed.  The  Resources  Agency  of California, State
           Water Quality Control Board.


                IV - B - CIRCULATING WATER SYSTEM

IV-B-1     Morgan,  RP  and  RG  Stross.  1969.   Destruction  of
           Phytoplankton  in  the Cooling Water Supply of a Steam
           Electric Station.  Ches. Sci. 1.0 j[3-4]_: 165-171.

IV-B-2     Fox, JL and MS Moyer. 1973.  Some Effects of  a  Power
           Plant on Marine Microbiota.  Ches. Sci. 1M1) • 1-10.

IV-B-3     Warinner, JE and ML Brehmer.  1966.   The  Effects  of
           Thermal  Effluents  on Marine Organisms.  Air and Wat.
           Pollut. Inter Jour. 10: 277-289.
                                R-10

-------
IV-B-4     Bush,  RM  1974.   Supplementary  materials.    Thermal
           Requirements  of  Freshwater  Fish.  Envir. Sci.  Tech.
           8(6) 561-568.

IV-B-5     Fogg, GE.  1966.   Algae  Cultures  and   Phytoplankton
           Ecology. U. of Wise. Press, Madison, Wise.  126  pp.

IV-B-6     Hutchinson, GE 1967.  A Treatise on Limnology   Vol  _II
           Introduction  to  Lake  Biology and the Limnoplankton.
           John Wiley and Sons, NY.

IV-B-7     Altman,  PL  and  DS  Dittmer.  1966.     Environmental
           Biology. Fed. Amer. Soc. Exp Biol. Bethesda, Md.

IV-B-8     Bott, TC,  R  Patrick,  and  RL  VanNote.   1973.    The
           Effects  of Natural Temperature Variations  on Riverine
           Communities.  In: USEPA. 1973.  Effects and Methods of
           Control of Thermal Discharges. Rept. to the Congress.
           Part 3, Nov. 1973. pp. 1181-1270.

IV-B-9     Confer, JL and P Blades. 1975.  Reaction  Distance  to
           Foodplankton By Lepomis gibbosus.  Vech int ver limnol
           .19: 2493-2497.

IV-B-10    Brooks,  JL.   Eutrophication  and  Changes  in    the
           Composition   of   the  Zooplankton.   Eutrophication:
           Causes, Conseguences, Correctives. NAS, Wash. D.C.

IV-B-11    Swedberg, DV 1968.  Food and Growth of the  Freshwater
           Drum  in Lewis and Clark Lake, South Dakota. Trans. Am
           Fish. Soc. 12 (4) ; 442-447.

IV-B-12    Minckley, WL, JE Johnson, JN Rinne, and SE  Willoughby.
           1970.   Food  of  Buffalofishes,  Genus   Ictiobus,  in
           Central  Arizona Reservoirs.  Trans. Am.  Fish.  Soc. 99
           (2) : 333-342

IV-B-13    Bonneau, DC, JW McGuire, OW Tiemeier,  and  CW  Deyoe.
           1972.   Food Habits and Growth of Channel Catfish Fry,
           Ictalurus Punctatus.  Trans. Am.  Fish.   Soc.   101(4):
           613-618.

IV-B-14    Cramer, JD and GR Marzolf,  1970.  Selective Predation
           of  Zooplankton by Gizzard Shad.  Trans Am. Fish. Soc.
           12 (2) : 320-322.

IV-B-15    Hynes, HBN. 1972.  The Ecology of Running Waters. Univ
           of Toronto Press, Can. 555p.
                               R-ll

-------
IV-B-16    Hall,  DJr  WE  Cooper,  and  EE  Werner.  1970.    An
           experimental  approach  to the production dynamics and
           structure of freshwater animal  communities.   Limnol.
           Qceanoqr. 15 (6)  839-928.

IV-B-17    Chutter, FM 1975.  Variation in the Day-Time Drift  in
           a Natal River.  Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol 19: 1728-1735.

Iv-B-18    Waters, TF. 1972.  The Drift of Stream Insects.   Ann.
           Rev. En torn. _17:  253-272.

IV-B-19    Nebeker, AV and AE Lempke. 1968.  Preliminary  Studies
           on  the Tolerance of Aquatic Insects to Heated Waters.
           J._ Kans. Ent.  Soc. jn: 413-118.

IV-B-20    Coutant, CC and Goodyear, CP 1972.   Thermal  Effects.
           J Water. Poll. Cont. Fed. 4^: 1250.

IV-B-21    Wurtz, C, and C Renn.  1965.   Water  Temperature  and
           Aquatic   Life.    Cooling  Water  Studies  for  Edison
           Electric Institute.

IV-B-22    Mihursky, JA and VS Kennedy. 1967.  Water  Temperature
           Criteria  to  Protect Aquatic Life.  Amer. Fish. Soc.,
           Spec. Pub. No. JJ.

IV-B-23    Sedell, JR, FU  Triska,  and  NS  Triska.  1975.   The
           Processing  of  Conifer  and  Hardwood  Leaves  in Two
           Coniferous  Forest  Streams:  I.  Weight,  Loss,   and
           Associated  Invertebrates.  Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol 19:
           1617-1627.

IV-B-24    Cummins, KW, RC Peterson, FO Howard, JC  Wuycheck  and
           VI  Holt.  1973.   The  Utilization  of Leaf Litter by
           Stream Detritivores.  Ecology 5J4  (2) : 336-345.

IV-B-25    Peterson, RC and KW Cummins. 1974.  Leaf Processing in
           a woodland Stream.  Freshw. Biol. j»: 343-368.

IV-B-26    Marcy, BC Jr.  1974.   Vulnerability  and  survival  of
           entrained organisms at water intakes, with emphasis on
           young  fishes.  ASCE, Power Div. Spec, conf., Boulder,
           Col.  Unpublished mimeo.  August  13, 1974.

IV-B-27    Marcy, BC Jr.  1971.  Survival of  Young  Fish  in  the
           Discharge  Canal  of  a Nuclear Power Plant.  J. Fish.
           Res. Bd. Can.  28: 1057-1060.

IV-B-28    Schubel, JR. 1974.  Effects of Exposure to Time-Excess
           Temperature Histories Typically Experienced  at  Power
           Plants  on  the  Hatching Success of Fish Eggs.  Ches.
           Bay. Inst., Spec. Rept. 32.  Johns Hopkins Univ.
                                R-12

-------
IV-B-29    Coutant, CC. 1973.  Time-Temperature Relationships and
           Lethal  Temperatures   for   Resistance   of   Aquatic
           Organisms   (Principally fish) to Extreme Temperatures.
           In:  Technical Manual of Selected Techniques for Case-
           by-Case Evaluation  of  Thermal  Discharges.  US  Env.
           Prot.  Agy. Office of Enforcement and General Council,
           Wash., D.C. Appendix. 2.

IV-B-30    Davies,  RM  and  LD   Jensen.   1974.    Effects   of
           Entrainment of Zooplankton at Three mid-Atlantic Power
           Plant.    Electric  Power  Res.  Inst.  Cooling  water
           Discharge Res. Proj.  (RR-49) , Pub.  No.  74-049-00-1,
           Rept. 16, The John Hopkins Univ.

IV-B-31    Hey, J and K Baldwin. 1974b.  Missouri  River  Aquatic
           Ecology  Study Report, June, July, August 1974. unpub.
           mimeo.

IV-B-32    US   Environmental   Protection    Agency,    Effluent
           Guidelines   Div.   1973.   Development  Document  for
           Proposed  Best  Technology  Available  for  Minimizing
           Advance  Environmental  Impact of Cooling Water Intake
           Structures.  USEPA. Dec. 1973, 775 p.

IV-B-33    Brown, BE, I Inman, and A Jerald, Jr. 1970.  Schooling
           and Shelter Seeking Tendencies in  Fingerling  Channel
           Catfish.  Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 99(3): 540-545.
IV-B-34    Matthiessen, GC. 1972.  Marine Research, Inc. Wareham,
           Mass. Personal Communication.

IV-B-35    Hocutt,  CH  1973.   Swimming  Performance  of   Three
           Warmwater   Fishes  Exposed  to  a  Rapid  Temperature
           Change.  Ches. Sci. 14 (i) : 11-16.

IV-B-36    King,  LR.  1969.   Swimming  Speed  of  the   Channel
           Catfish,  White  Crappie,   and  Other Warmwater Fishes
           from  Conowingo  Reservoir,  Susquehanna   River   Pa.
           Ich thvo 1 ogic a 1 Assoc. Bull. No. 4..

IV-B-37    Siegel, S. 1956.   Nonparametric  Statistics.  McGraw-
           Hill Book Co., Inc. N.Y.

IV-B-38    Hey, J. and K. Baldwin.   1976.   Impingement  studies,
           Neal  III.   Also  relative abundance estimates - Neal
           II.   Preliminary  Recommendations  for   Design   and
           Operation of Intake and Screens.

IV-B-39    George Neal Station,  Units  1-3,  Effect  of  Cooling
           Water Discharge on the Temperature Distribution of the
           Missouri  River.   Ebasco   Services  Incorporated, New
           York, NY, February 1971.

IV-B-40    Environmental Impact Analysis - George Neal Unit No. 3_
           for Iowa  Public  Service   Company.   Ebasco  Services
           Incorporated, New York,  NY, January 1973.

                                R-13

-------
IV-B-41    Prych, EA, 1972. A Warm Water Effluent Analyzed  as  a
           Buoyant,  Surface  Jet.   Swedish  Meteorological  and
           Hydrological Institute, Series HYDRQLOG I. , No. 21.

IV-B-42    Morton, BR,  Taylor,  G  and  Turner,  JS.   Turbulent
           Gravitational    Convection    from   Maintained   and
           Instantaneous  Sources.   Proceedings  of  the   Royal
           Society. London. Vol. 234, 1956.

IV-B-43    shirazi, MA  and  Davis,  Workbook  of  Thermal  Plume
           Prediction - Volume .2 - Surface Discharge.  EPA-R2-72-
           0056, May 1974.

IV-B-44    us Army Corps  of  Engineers.  1971.   Missouri  River
           Hydrographic Survey - Omaha District Ponca to Rulo.


IV-B-45    US Environmental Protection Agency,  1973b.   Proposed
           Criteria For Water Quality, Vol. 1. October, 1973.

IV-B-46    Christiansen, AG, and BA Tichenor.  1968.   Industrial
           Waste   Guide   on  Thermal  Pollution.  FWPCA  Rept.,
           Cornwalls. Ore. 112p.

IV-B-47    Jones, JR Ericksen. 1964.   Fish and  River  Pollution.
           Buttenworth, Canton.

IV-B-48    Langford,  TE.  1972.   A  Comparative  Assessment  of
           Thermal  Effects  in  Some  British and North American
           Rivers.  In: Oglesby, RTCA  Carlson,  and  JA  McCann,
           eds.  River Ecology and Man.  Acad. Press, New York.

IV-B-49    Parker, FL and PA Krenkel. 1969.   Thermal  Pollution;
           Status of the Art. Vanderbilt Univ., Dept. Of Env. and
           Water Res. Eng., Rept. No. 3.

IV-B-50    Bush, RM, EB  Welch,  and  BW  Mar.  1974.   Potential
           Effects  of  Thermal  Discharges  on  Aquatic Systems.
           Env. Sci. Tech. 8 (6): 561-568.

IV-B-51    us Environmental Protection  Agency,  1973c.   Effects
           and  Methods  of Control of Thermal Discharges.  Rept.
           to the Congress by the Env. Prot. Agency in Accordance
           with Sect. 104(t)  of the Fed. Wat.  Poll.  Cont.  Act.
           Amend, of 1972.  Serv. No. 93-14. Part 3, Nov., 1973.

IV-B-52    Hey, J and K Baldwin. 1974a.   Missouri  River  Aquatic
           Ecology  Study Report, March - May, 1974.  Proj. Rept.
           to Iowa Public Service Co. 76p.

IV-B-53    Hey, J and K Baldwin.  1975.    Aquatic  Ecology  Study
           (Pre-operational  survey,   Unit  IJCI1.  of the Missouri
           River near the George Neal Station, Sioux City,  Iowa,
           June  1974  - December 1975.   Prepared for Iowa Public
           Service Co. 55p.

                                R-14

-------
IV-B-54    Andrews, JW and RR Stickeny.  1972.   Interactions  of
           Feeding Rates and Environmental Temperature on Growth,
           Food  Conversion,  and  Body  Composition  of  Channel
           Catfish.  Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 101 (1); 94-99.


IV-B-55    Hey, J and K Baldwin.  1974.   Aquatic  Ecology  Study
           (Pre-operational  Survey,  Neal  III)   of the Missouri
           River near the George Neal Station, Sioux City,  Iowa,
           May 1973 - May 1974.  Prepared for Iowa Public Service
           Co. 40p.

IV-B-56    Gammon, JR. 1973.  The Effect of Thermal Inputs on the
           Populations of  Fish  and  Macroinvertebrates  in  the
           Wabash  River.   Purdue  Univ.  Water  Res.  Ctr.,  W.
           Lafayette, Ind. Tech. Rept. No. 32.

IV-B-57    Gammon, JR. 1971.  The Response of Fish Populations in
           the wabash River to  Heated  Effluents.    Radioecology
           1971: 513-523.
IV-B-58    Carlander, K D. 1969.  Handbook of Freshwater Fishery
           Biology.  Vol. 1. Iowa State Univ Press, Ames, Icwa.
           751 p.

IV-B-59    Breder, C M Jr, and D E Posen. 1966.
           Modes of Reproduction in Fishes.
           T F H Pub., Jersey City, N?~J. 941 p.

IV-B-60    Lopinot-  A. 1970.
           What Fish Is This?
           111. Div. of Fish., Fish. Bull. No. 2.

IV-B-61    Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA).  1974.
           Guide for demonstrations under Section 316  of the
           F W P C A Amendments of 1972  (P.L. 92-500) .
           Unpublished mimeo, July 18, 1974.

IV-B-62    Jester, D B 1972.  Life History, Ecology, and
           Management of the Fiver Carpsucker, C^r^iodes
           carpio (Rafinesque), with Reference to Elephant
           Butte Lake. New Mexico State Univ., Ag. Exp. Sta.,
           Res. Rept. 243.
                                R-15

-------
                 IV - C - ATMOSPHERIC DISCHARGES

IV-C-1     Ebasco  Services,  Inc.,  1974:  Ambient  Air  Quality
           Studyq  Neal  Station  Units  1~1»  prepared  for Iowa
           Public Service Company, 20pp.

IV-C-2     American   Conference   of   Industrial    Hygienists,
           Industrial Ventilation, 1970. p. 13-19.

IV-C-3     Stern, AC. 1968.   Air Pollution.  Vol. 3, p. 673.

IV-C-4     Taylor, OC 1969.   Injury Symptoms Produced by  Oxidant
           Air  Pollutants,   Handbook  of  Effects  Assessment  -
           Vegetation Damage, edited by NL Lacasse and WJ  Moroz,
           Center for Air Environment Studies, Pennsylvania State
           University, University Park.

IV-C-5     Severson, JG, Jr. 1975.   Sulfur  and  Higher  Plants,
           Sulfur  in the Environment, Missouri Botanical Garden,
           St. Louis, pp. 92-111.

IV-C-6     Buckman, YO, and  NC  Brady,  1969.   The  Nature  and
           Properties of Soils. 7th edition, MacMillan Corp., New
           York.   653  pp.   57.   Trace  Elements,  Soil, the US
           Department of Agriculture.


IV-C-7     Taylor, LD. 1973.  Acute responses of plants to aerial
           pollutants.  Chapter 2  in  Air  Pollution  Damage  to
           Vegetation.   edit.    by   JA  Naegele.   Advances  in
           Chemistry  Series  122,  American   Chemical   Society
           (Washington D.C.  137p.)

IV-C-8     Thomas, MD. 1961.  Effects of Air Pollution on Plants.
           Air Pollution,  World  Health  Organization  Monograph
           Series No. 46, pp. 233-278.

IV-C-9     Linzon, SN. 1969.  Symptomatology  of  Sulfur  Dioxide
           Injury on Vegetation, Handbook of Effects Assessment -
           Vegetation  Damaget   ed.  by  NL Lacasse and WJ Moroz,
           Center for Air Environment Studies, Pennsylvania State
           University, University Park.

IV-C-10    Katz, M. and AW McCallum. 1952.  The Effect of  Sulfur
           Dioxide  on  Conifers.   Air  Pollution,  edited by JC
           McCabe, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.

IV-C-11    US Environmental Protection Agency. 1973.  Effects  of
           Sulfur   Oxides   in  the  Atmosphere  on  Vegetation.
           National Environmental Research Center Report No. EPA-
           R3-030.

IV-C-12    Bennett, JH and AC Hill, 1973.  Inhibition of Apparent
           Photosynthesis by Air  Pollutants.   J.  Environmenta1
           Quality 2  (4): pp. 526.530.
                                R-16

-------
IV-C-13    Jones, EC, Cunningham, JR, McLaughlin, SB, Lee, NT and
           SS Ray. 1973.  Investigation of alleged Air  Pollution
           Effects  on  Yield  of Soybeans in the Vicinity of the
           Shawnee  Steam  Plant.   Tennessee  Valley  Authority,
           Division of Environmental Planning. E-EB-73-3.

IV-C-14    Tingey, DT, Reinert, RA, Wickliff,  C,  and  WW  Heck.
           1973.   Chronic  ozone or sulfur dioxide exposures, or
           both, affect the early vegetative growth of  soybeans.
           Canadian Journal of Plant Science 53; 875-879

IV-C-15    Tingey, DT, Heck, WW, and RA Reinert. 1971.  Effect of
           low concentrations of  ozone  and  sulfur  dioxide  on
           foilage,  growth  and yield of radish.  Journal of the
           American Society of Horticultural Science 96(3);  369-
           371.

IV-C-16    Jones, HC, Weber, D and D Balsillie. 1974.  Acceptable
           limits  for  air  pollution  damages  and   vegetation
           effects:  sulfur dioxide.  Paper No. 74-225, presented
           at the  67th  Annual  Meeting  of  the  Air  Pollution
           Control  Association,  Denver,  Colorado,  June  9-13,
           1974, Air Pollution Control  Association  (Pittsburgh)
           31p.

IV-C-17    Linzon, SN 1973.  Sulfur dioxide air quality standards
           for vegetation.  Paper No.  73-107  presented  at  the
           66th  Annual  Meeting  of  the  Air  Pollution Control
           Association, Chicago, Illinois.  June 24-28, 1973, Air
           Pollution Control Association  (Pittsburgh), 19p.

IV-C-18    Andrews, NJ. 1975.  Lichens: Natural Indicators of Air
           Quality.   Sulfur   in   the   Environment,   Missouri
           Botanical Garden, St. Louis, pp. 79-91.

IV-C-19    White, KL, Hill AC, and JH Bennett. 1974.  Synergistic
           inhibition of apparent photosynthesis rate of  alfalfa
           by   combinations   of  sulfur  dioxide  and  nitrogen
           dioxide.  Environmental Science and Technology 6!  (b) ;
           574576.

IV-C-20    Tingey, DT, Reinert, RA, Dunning,  JA,  and  WW  Heck.
           1971.   Vegetation  injury  from  the  interaction  of
           nitrogen dioxide and  sulfur  dioxide.  Phytopathology
           J51: 1506-1511.

IV-C-21    Tingey, DT, RA Reinert, JA Dunning, and WW Heck. 1973.
           Foliar Injury Responses of  Eleven  Plant  Species  to
           Ozone/Sulfur     Dioxide     Mixtures.     Atmospheric
           Environment 7:  201-208.

IV-C-22    Heagle, AS, Body, DE, and GE Neely. 1974.  Injury  and
           yield  responses  of soybean to chronic doses of ozone
           and sulfur dioxide in the field.   Phytopathology  64;
           132-136.

                               R-17

-------
IV-C-23    Heggested, HE,  Anderson,  CE,  and  WA  Feder.  1974.
           Determining   acceptable   limits  for  air  pollution
           dosages and vegetation effects: ozone.  Paper No.  74-
           224  presented  at  the 17th Annual Meeting of the Air
           Pollution Control Association  (Pittsburgh), 37 p.

IV-C-24    Benedict, HM, JC Miller, and RE Olson. 1971.  Economic
           impact of air  pollutants  on  plants  in  the  United
           States.  Stamford Research Institute.

IV-C-25    United States  Forest  Service.  1972.   Our  Air.  US
           Department of Agriculture, NE-INF-14-72REV.

IV-C-26    Likens, GE and FH Bormann. 1974.  Acid Rain: A Serious
           Regional Environmental Problem.   Science  184;  1176-
           1179.

IV-C-27    Frohliger, JC and R Kane.  1975.   Precipitation:  its
           acidic nature.  Science 89: 455-457.

IV-C-28    Richards, LA, ed, 1954.  Diagnosis and Improvement  of
           Saline  and  Alkali  Soils.  Agricultural Handbook No.
           60, US Dept of Agriculture. 160 pp.


IV-C-29    Reuss, JO, 1975.  Sulfur in the soil system.   Chapter
           4  -  Sulfur  in  the  Environment, Missouri Botanical
           Garden (St. Louis), 187 p.

IV-C-30    Wood, T and FH  Bormann.  1974.   The  Effects  of  an
           Artificial   Acid  Mist  Upon  the  Growth  of  Betula
           alleghniensis Britr. Environmental Pollution 7 (4); pp.
           259-268.

IV-C-31    Hindawi,    AJ,   and   HC   Ratsch.   1974.     Growth
           abnormalities   of   Pollution.    Paper   No.  74-252
           presented at  the  67th  Annual  Meeting  of  the  Air
           Pollution  Control Association, Denver, Colorado, June
           9-13,  1974.   Air   Pollution   Control   Association
           (Pittsburgh), 21p.

IV-C-32    Gordon, CC. 1972.   Mount  Storm  Study.   Unpublished
           Manuscript  Submitted  to  US Environmental Protection
           Agency, November  17,  1972.   EPA  Contract  No.  68-
           02,0229.  31 pp.

IV-C-33    Overrein,  LN   1972.    Sulfur   Pollution   Patterns
           Observed;   Leaching   of   Calcium   in  Forest  soil
           Determined.  Ambio 1 (4); 145-147.

IV-C-34    Ti, P, and HE Lindsberg. 1975.  Rainwater pH dose to  a
           major power plant.  Atmospheric Environment 9, 81-88.

IV-C-35    US  Environmental  Protection  Agency,  Air  Pollution
           Control   Office.  1971.   Air  Quality  Criteria  for
           Nitrogen Oxides.  Publication No. AP-84.

                                R-18

-------
IV-C-36    Thompson,  CR,  Tingey,  DT,  and  RA  Reinert.  1974.
           Acceptable   limits  for  air  pollution  dosages  and
           vegetation  effects:  nitrogen  dioxide.   Paper   No.
           74-227 presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Air
           Pollution  Control Association, Denver, Colorado, June
           9-13.  1974.   Air   Pollution   Control   Association
           (Pittsburgh), 22 p.

IV-C-37    Hill,  AC,  and  JH  Bennett.  1970.   Inhibition   of
           Apparent    Photosynthesis    by    Nitrogen   Oxides.
           Atmospheric Environment £: pp 341-348.

IV-C-38    Ricks,  GR,  and  RJH  Williams.  1971.   Effects   of
           Atmospheric  Pollution  on  Deciduous Woodland Part 2:
           Effects of Particulate Matter Upon Stomatal  Diffusion
           Resistance  in  Leaves of Quercus petraea (Mattuschka)
           Leibl.  Environmental Pollution 6_: 111-129.

IV-C-39    US  Department  of  Health,  Education,  and  Welfare,
           Public  Health  Service National Air Pollution Control
           Administration.  1969.   Air  Quality   Criteria   for
           Particulate Matter.  Pub. No. ap-49.


IV-C-40    Eller,  BM.  1974.   Street  duct  heat   up   plants.
           (strauss entauk heiet pf lanzen auf).  Text in German.
           Umschau  Wiss.  Tech.,  74 (9) ; 283-284.  Air Pollution
           Technical  Information  Center  (US.  EPA)  Literature
           Search Abstract No. 61311.

IV-C-41    US. Environmental Protection Agency. 1971.   In  Mount
           Storm,  West  Virginia  -  Gorman, Maryland, and Luke,
           Maryland  -  Keyser,  West  Virginia,  Air   Pollution
           Abatement Activity.  NIIS ph 199181. 159 p.

IV-C-42    Wood, FA. 1975.  Development of  the  long  and  short
           needle  disease of pines.  Abstract of paper presented
           at  the  First   International   Symposium   on   Acid
           Precipitation and the First Ecosystem, Columbus, Ohio,
           May 12-15, 1975.

IV-C-43    Talisayon, SD. 1972.  Low-level air pollution  effects
           on    experimental   animals:   a   review.    Cornell
           University,  Ithaca,  New  York,   National   Sciences
           Foundation, Paper No. 72.  pp. 11-15.

IV-C-44    Air Quality Criteria for Sulfur Oxides.  National  Air
           Pollution  Control Administration Publications No. AP-
           50.  US.  Department of Health, Education, and Welfare,
           Washington DC, January 1969.

IV-C-45    Lillie,  RD.  1972.   Air  Pollutants  Affecting   the
           Performance of Domestic Animals.  Agriculture Handbook
           No.   380,   rev.   ed.   US.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,
           Washington, DC. 109 pp.
                               R-19

-------
IV-C-46    Amdur, MO, and D  Underbill.  1968.   The  effects  of
           various  aerosols  on  the  response of guinea pigs to
           sulfur dioxide.  Arch.  Env.  Health 16: 460-468.

IV-C-47    Hillman,  RC.  1972.   Biological   effects   of   air
           pollution on insects, emphasizing the reactions of the
           honey  bee   (Apis mellifera L)  to sulfur dioxide.  PhD
           thesis.  Department of Entomology, Graduate School  of
           Pennsylvania State University,  p. 160.

IV-C-48    Air  Quality  fpr  Nitrogen  Oxides.   Air   Pollution
           Control    Office    Publication    O.   AP-84.    US.
           Environmental  Protection  Agency,   Washington,   DC,
           January 1971.

IV-C-49    Treon, JF, FR. Dutra, J Cappel, H Signmon, and others.
           1950.  Toxicity of sulfuric acid  mist.   Arch  Indus.
           Hyg. Occup. Med. 2: 716-734.

IV-C-50    Amdur, MO, RZ Schulz, and P Drinker.  1952.   Toxicity
           of  sulfuric acid mist to guinea pigs.  Arch. Industr.
           Hyg. £>: 318-329.

IV-C-51    Amdur, MO, 1958.  The respiratory response  of  guinea
           pigs  to sulfuric acid mist.  Arch. Indus. Health. 18;
           407-414.

IV-C-52    Thomas, MD, RH Hendricks, FD Gunn,  and  J  Critchlow.
           1958.   Prolonged  exposure of guinea pigs to sulfuric
           acid aerosol.  Arch. Indus.  Health. 17; 70-80.

IV-C-53    Cooper,  WC,  and  IF  Tabershaw.  1966.    Biological
           Effects of nitrogen dioxide in relation to air quality
           standards.  Arch. Environ.  Health. 12; 522-530

IV-C-54    Crocker, TT. 1973.  Nitrogen oxides - animal  effects.
           Preprint,  National  Academy  of Sciences, Washington,
           DC. 17 pp.

IV-C-55    US Dept. of Health, Education,   Welafare.  1969.   Air
           Quality   Criteri a  for  Particulate  Matter.   Public
           Health Service, National Air Polution  Control  Admin,
           Durham, NC. Pub. No. AP-49

IV-C-56    Jackson, WB, EJ Ryback, and SH Vessey.  1974  Vertical
           barriers   to   bird  migration.   Conference  on  the
           Biological  Aspects  of  the  Bird/Aircraft  Collision
           Problem.   Clemson University,  South Carolina, P. 279-
           287.

IV-C-57    Zimmerman, DA. 1975.  The changing seasons.   American
           Birds 19: 23-28.

IV-C-58    Rybak, EJ, WB Jackson, and SH Vessey. 1973.  Impact of
           Cooling Towers on bird migration.   Proceedings  Sixth
           Bird  Control Seminar, Bowling Green State University,
           30-31 October-November, 1973, pp. 187-194.

                                R-20

-------
IV-C-59    Mudge, JE and  RW  Firth,  Jr.  1975.   Evaluation  of
           cooling  tower  ecological  effects  - an approach and
           case  history.   Presented  before  the  21st   Annual
           Meeting  American  Nuclear Society, June 12, 1975, New
           Orleans, LA. 8 pp.

IV-C-60    Overing, R. 1936.  The  1935  fall  migration  at  the
           Washington Monument.  Wilson Bull. 48: 222-224.

IV-C-61    Brewer,  R  and  JA  Ellis.  1958.   An  analysis   of
           migrating  birds killed at a television tower in east-
           central Illinois, September 1955-May  1957.   Auk  75:
           400-414.

IV-C-62    Bellrose, FC.   1968.   Waterfowl  migration  corridors
           east  of  the  Rocky  Mountains  in the United States.
           111. Nat. His. Sur. Biol. Notes 61. 24 pp.


IV-C-63    Bellrose, FC.  1971.   The  distribution  of  nocturnal
           migrants in the air space.  Auk 88: 397-424.
                               R-21

-------
                 V-C - PLANT DESIGN ALTERNATIVES

V-o-1      Roffman, A. 1973.  The State of the Art  of  Saltwater
           Cooling  Towers  for Steam Electric Generating Plants.
           Westinghouse Electric Corp.

V-C-2      United States Salinity  Laboratory.  1954.   Diagnosis
           and   Improvement   of   Saline   and   Alkali  Soils.
           Agricultural Handbook No. 60.

V-C-3      Stout, PR and CM Johnson. 1957.  Trace  elements,  in:
           Soil. The Yearbook of Agriculture, 1957. USDA.

v-c-4      Jordan, HU and HM Reisenauer. 1957.  Sulfur  and  soil
           fertility.   In:  Soil,  the  Yearbook of Agriculture,
           1957. USDA.

V-c-5      Fried, M  and  H  Broeshart.  1967.   The  Soil  Plant
           Systems.   (Adademic Press, NY.).

V-C-6      Martin, WE. 1959.   The  vegetation  of  Island  Beach
           State Park, NJ.  Ecological Monographs 29 (1}; 1-46.
                                R-22

-------
                            GLOSSARY
BOD5 - five day biochemical oxygen demand.  A test of pollutional
potential.

B.T.U. (British Thermal Unit) - the quantity of heat required  to
raise  the  temperature  of  one  kilogram  of  water  one degree
Celsius.

Bottom Ash - incombustible  particles  that  settle  out  in  the
furnace after coal is consumed.

c.f.s. - measure of flow in cubic feet per second.

Cationic and Anionic Exchanger Trains  -  a  method  of producing
demineralized  water  by  exchanging  dissolved  ions   (calcium,
sodium, chloride, etc)  for hydrogen and hydroxide ions.

Circulating water system  - system of pumps, pipes and structures
that provides a continuous supply of cooling water to the plant.

Condenser - heat exchanger wherein the waste heat from the  steam
cycle is transferred to the cooling water flow.

Cyclone boiler  - a type of boiler that employs a cyclone furnace
which is a  water-cooled  horizontal  cylinder  wherein  fuel  is
fired, heat is released at extremely high rates and combustion is
completed.

Electrofishinq  - a method of capturing fish in which an electric
field is created in the water between two submerged electrodes or
between one electrode and a "ground".

Electrostatic precipitator - equipment  which  removes  particles
from  the stack flue gas by imparting an electrical charge on the
suspended particles and collecting them on electrodes.

    a.   cold side - refers to the location of the  electrostatic
         precipitator  in  the  flue gas stream at the air heater
         outlet.

    b.   hot side - refers to the location of  the  electrostatic
         precipitator  in  the  flue gas stream at the air heater
         inlet.

Entrainment - the process by which organisms are  passed  through
the plant's circulating water system.
                                   G-l

-------
Entrapment - the prevention of the escape of organisms due to the
cooling water currents and forces involved.

f .p. s. - measure of velocity in feet per second.

Filter backwash  - that portion of wastewater resulting from wash
of the filter bed.

Fly ash - incombustible fine particles that are suspended in  the
flue gas.

Gill Net - a single wall of fabric, hung from a float line.  Fish
are  captured  by swimming into and partly through the mesh where
they cannot disengage themselves.

Impingement - sharp collision of organisms with a physical member
of the  intake  structure  (usually  in  reference  to  traveling
screens in the intake forebay).

Inclined trash rack  -  system of bars located on the face of the
intake structure to protect the screens and pumps from damage due
to large debris and ice.

Intake structure - water  screening  and  pump  chamber  for  the
circulating water system.

Particulates  - finely divided solid or liquid airborne material,
with dimensions ranging between 0.0002 microns  and  2.0  microns
diameter.

Plume  -  effluent  from  a  stack  retaining  its  bulk physical
properties until dispersed by atmospheric turbulence.

SO2 - sulfur dioxide

Sand weir guides - vertical slots that hold the  sand  deflecting
plates in place at the base of the intake structure.

Seal well  -  part  of  the  discharge  system that maintains and
regulates the siphon action at the condenser.

Seining   - in this report, the  process  whereby  a  rectangular
net,  fitted  with  poles  on each end, is pulled through shallow
water for the purpose of catching fish.

Sluice - transportation of material using water as a conveyance.

Stop log guides - vertical slots that hold the stop logs in place
during intake structure dewatering operations.

Trammel net    - three separate pieces of net  suspended  from  a
float line extending to a lead line.  The two outer nets are made
of  coarse  twine  and large mesh.  The inner one is made of fine
twine and small mesh.  fish are captured by swimming into the net
                                   G-2

-------
^OST*r*f
      r,
        UNITED STATES  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                                   REGION VII
                                 I73.r; BALTIMORE
                            KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI  6410meatal.JQ!ipj^t
  Statement (EIS) for the George Neal S^am El_e_ctric,generating Station,,
  Ujvit 4.  This document is submitted for your review and comment pur-
  suant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act
  of  1969 (Public Law 91-190).

  The principal owner of the power plant, Iowa Public Service Company,
  has applied for Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps
  of  Engineers permits, and two cooperatives, Cornbelt Power and
  Northeast Iowa Cooperatives, have applied for Rural Electrification
  Administration loan guarantees.  This document serves as the EIS for
  these three agencies and will be used to evaluate the environmental
  impacts of their actions.

  The applicant (Iowa Public Service Company) has expressed the
  necessity to complete construction of the plant's intake facility
  prior to the opening of the Missouri River for navigation.  Therefore,
  a request has been submitted to the Council on Environmental  Quality
  (CEQ) to reduce the "no action" period to 15 calendar days for the
  issuance of the Corps of Engineers' Section 10 and 404 permits.
  Comments or objections pertaining to the issuance of the Section 10
  and 404 permits for construction of the intake structure should be
  submitted to this office within 15 days of receipt of this letter.
  Comments or objections to the other actions described in the final
  EIS should be submitted within the normal 30-day period.  Following
  the no action period, the above Federal agencies may issue their
  permits and loan guarantees.

  The Final EIS is available for public review at the Environmental
  Protection Agency, Region VII library and the Sioux City Public
  Library, Sioux City, Iowa.
                                                nMtu—"   ,„,
                                                \\\  ,-•, rx\  VJ>
                                                AX  \'':» ~'
                                                              U

-------

-------
Please refer this notice to all persons who may be interested in
the project.  We appreciate the time and effort you will  spend
reviewing this document.

Sincerely yours,
                  .
Charles V. Wright        .)
Acting Regional Administrator

Enclosure

-------

-------
       STATEMENT OF FINDINGS

     GEORGE NEAL STEAM ELECTRIC
     GENERATING STATION, UNIT 4
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
             REGION VII
        KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI
            JANUARY 1977

-------

-------
                       STATEMENT OF FINDINGS

The interpretation and evaluation of information collected during
the preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has
resulted in the following determinations:

1.  The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' issuance of a Section 10, 1899
River and Harbors Act permit and Section 404, Federal Water Pollution
Control Act Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92-500) permit is not expected
to create significant environmental impacts.  This is demonstrated
by the lack of evidence for environmental degradation and the
absence of controversy or public concern with these issuances.

2.  The Rural Electrification Administration's issuance of loan
guarantees to Corn Belt Power Cooperative and Northwest Iowa Power
Cooperative to finance 25 MW and 100 MW, respectively, should not
have a significant impact on the'environment.

3.  The evaluation of information relevant to the Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA) issuance of a National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit required under Section 402, P.L.
92-500, has demonstrated the potential  for environmental degradation
resulting from ash disposal and coal storage operations for Neal
Unit 4.  In order to mitigate these impacts, the applicant and  EPA,
Region VII, have agreed to the attached stipulation.   In addition,
the NPDES permit may be conditioned to  assure compliance with the
Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-523), EPA's  Quality Criteria
for Water, Iowa State Water Quality Standards, and all guidelines to
be promulgated pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act of  1976
(P.L. 94-469), for leakage and runoff from those operations.
                                                            ""V
        _	                    V.  Wright          ^
         Date                     Acting Regional  Administrator

-------

-------
             UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                             REGION VII
                           1735 BALTIMORE
                    KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI  64108

IN THE MATTER OF

NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE                    STIPULATION FOR THE
ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT                       APPROVAL OF THE
APPLICATION NO.   IA 0061859                     REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR
IOWA PUBLIC SERVICE CO.
GEORGE NEAL STATION UNIT NO. 4

                    Applicant

                       PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

     The Iowa Public  Service Company, hereinafter "the Applicant," has
applied for a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
pennit to discharge pollutants from Georae Neal Station Unit No. 4.  The
application has been  identified as NPDES No. IA 0061859.  Site preparation
began in March 1975,  and the construction schedule calls for the facility
to begin trial operation in September 1978.  On February 11, 1976, the
Regional Administrator made the determination that this facility is a new
source as defined in  Section 306 of the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act.  The Environmental Protection Agency then assumed the responsibility
of lead agency for the preparation of an environmental impact statement.
     Potentially  unacceptable environmental impacts in the form of ground
water degradation have been identified with the proposed ash disposal and
coal handling systems.  The stipulations set forth below were developed
pursuant.to EPA's authority and responsibility under the National
Environmental Policy  Act of 1969.  The parties enter into this stipulation
for the purposes  of assuring both that environmentally acceptable
alternatives will be  selected for the ash disposal and coal handling
systems and that  the  administrative processing of the permit will proceed
in an expeditious manner.

                            STIPULATION

     The Applicant and the Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region VII, stipulate and agree as follows:

     1.  Within nine  (9) months from the date this Stipulation is signed
by the Regional Administrator, the Applicant shall submit to the Regional
Administrator for review and approval, the location, design and method
of operation of proposed alternative ash disposal sites and/or methods
of disposal.  The alternative sites shall satisfy the following criteria,
adapted from Iowa Department of Environmental Ouality Rules and Regulations
Relating to Solid Waste Disposal, Chapters 25 et seq.:

-------

-------
        a.  So situated as to obviate any significant, predictable
leakage of leachates from the landfill to shallow unconsolidated aquifers
that are in actual use or are deemed to be of potential use as a water
resource.

        b.  So situated that the base of the proposed landfill is at
least five feet above the high water table unless a lesser separation is
unlikely to have a significant effect on ground and surface waters.

        c.  Not in significant hydroloaic subsurface or surface connection
with standing or flowing surface water.

        d.  Not situated in an unconsolidated sequence that will permit
more than 0.004 cubic foot of.liquid per day per souare foot of area
downward leakage into a bedrock or alluvial aquifer if such an aquifer
is present beneath or adjacent to the proposed site.  The potential
downward leakage will be evaluated by means of the generalized Darcy's
Law Q = PIA where:
Q = feet of liquid, day, foot area of the interface,
P = coefficient of permeability of the unconsolidated confining unit,
I = the hydrologic gradient derived by the function:
Piezometric head in the unconsol idated sediments minus the piezometric
head in the bedrock aquifer divided by the thickness of the confining
unit of lowest permeability nominated to retard downward migration of
liquids or derived by other acceptable engineering practices, and
A = one square foot of area at the base of the landfill.

        e.  Outside a flood plain or shoreland, unless proper engineering
and sealing of the site will render it acceptable and prior approval of
the Iowa Natural Resources Council and where necessary the U.S. Corps of
Engineers is obtained.

     2.  Satisfaction of the site selection criteria in 1, above, does
not preclude the Regional Administrator from disapproving a proposed
ash disposal system on the basis of an unreasonable environmental impact
as compared to alternative systems.

     3.  The coal pile should be confined to an area as small as
practical with boundaries fixed with a dike system to prevent uncontrolled
runoff.  Surface preparation of the area prior to actual storage of coal
should ensure that the infiltration rate is less than 0.004 cubic feet
per day per square foot.  All surface runoff except that resulting from
a precipitation event which exceeds a 10-year 24-hour storm (4.3 inches)
shall be controlled and treated to a maximum of 50 mq/1 total suspended
solids and a pH within the range of 6.0 to 9.0  The treatment system
shall be designed and operated so as to discharge the supernatant from

-------

-------
sedimentation structures into the Missouri River as soon as practical
after the precipitation event ends so as to minimize the potential for
leaching of soluble pollutants into the ground water.  Settled materials
shall be removed and disposed of with ash or burned in the facility
boilers.

     4.  Within 180 days of the date this Stipulation is signed by the
Regional Administrator, the Applicant shall submit to the Regional
Administrator for review and approval the design of a monitoring
program to assess the impact of the ash disposal system and coal pile
leachates on the ground water.

     5.  The Applicant waives its right to request an adjudicatory
hearing on any item agreed to herein.

     6.  Nothing in this Stipulation shall be deemed to relieve the
Applicant from liability for non-compliance with other provisions of
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, or any other
federal laws, including any requirements of the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act of 1976, which might be made applicable to this
facility.

     7.  The terms contained herein shall not bind any person not
a party to the Stipulation and shall not bind the Applicant or the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency until signed by the Applicant
and the Regional Administrator, Region VII.
       Date
                                                           .
       Date't£-\ Director, Enforcement Division
                                    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                    Region VII
       Date                     -^>'Regional Administrator          A,
                                    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                    Region VII

-------

-------
carrying the loose fine mesh through the  adjacent  coarse  mesh,
becoming trapped.

Traveling screen  -  rotating  fine screen that removes debris in
the intake structure.
                                  G-3

-------

-------