O
NJ
SJ
.:|4
|^:
*;>y-.
•'S!
r*a
fl
m '
$&
&m*v-$M
;Y "' >"Lr' .'». :
i">tl/-.T <*»:.•.!.
-------
-------
JUN 22 1992
O
AFFIRMATIVE EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM
FY 1992 MID-YEAR REVIEW
October 1, 1991 - April 18, 1992
This data report addresses the status of minorities and nonminority women in supervisory and managerial positions in
grades GM 13-15 and the Senior Executive Service (SES) to include hires/conversions, and affirmative employment goals
for senior management positions in Professional and Administrative occupations and the extent to which each AAship and
Region has achieved the targeted goals during the first half of FY 1992.
The benchmark for determining affirmative employment progress is the civilian labor force1 since the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (EEOC) assesses each Federal agencies progress in taking affirmative employment actions by
comparing the representation of minorities and nonminority women in the appropriate civilian labor force with the agencies
work force population.
Some targeted groups have increased their presence in the EPA's upper management levels. Nevertheless, even with these
increases, a substantial disparity exists at grade levels GM 14, GM 15 and SES. While the EPA shares this condition with
many other Federal agencies, it must be rectified. We are not alone in this opinion. In her October 23, 1991, testimony
before the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, Constance Newman, Director, Office of Personnel Management
(OPM) said that "...the percentages of women and minorities in the SES and the pipeline to the SES are unacceptable."
While some AAships and Regions have made progress, others continue to show little or no increases. It is recognized that
a number of factors, such as job requirements, educational levels of employees, employees' time in grade, and the number
of job vacancies all influence the progression employees have made in the EPA's hierarchy. However, much of the data
in this report depicts a low rate of representation and, in some instances, a total absence of minorities and nonminority
women which is sufficient to warrant continued use of affirmative employment/advancement initiatives.
1 To measure representation, the September 1988, civilian labor force data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics was
used. However, the levels of underrepresentation identified in this report may be even more severe than depicted since
the Bureau's data does not cover enough households to provide statistically sound projections of a number of targeted
groups and more current benchmarking data were not readily available.
-------
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS .
WORK FORCE PROFILE GM 13-15:
Percent of managers by AAship/Region as compared to the Agency (EPA) and the Civilian Labor Force -
MINORITY (Minority men and minority women) 1
MINORITY MEN 2
MINORITY WOMEN 3
NONMINORITY WOMEN 4
Percent of managers - September 1991 as compared to March 1992:
MINORITY (Minority men and minority women):
By AAshlp 5
By Region 6
NONMINORITY WOMEN:
By AAshlp 7
By Region 8
HIRES:
Percent of Management Hires GM 13-15 - Minorfties/Nonminority Women - October 1, 1991 - March 7, 1992
by AAship/Region 9
Number of Management Hires vs Opportunities GM 13-15 • Minorrties/Nonminority Women October 1, 1991 -
March 7, 1992:
By AAshlp 10
By Region 11
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
PARITY COMPARISON:
Number Mlnorftles/Nonminortty Women Managers GM 13-15 Agency-wWe Compared to the number for Parity 12
Number of Managers GM 13-15 Compared to the Number for Parity:
Women (Minority and nonminority women) Managers GM 13-15:
Number by AAshlp as compared to number for Parity 13
Percent of Parity by AAshlp 14
Number by Region as compared to number for Parity 15
Percent of Parity by Region 16
Nonminority Women Managers GM 13-15:
Number by AAshlp as compared to number for Parity 17
Percent of Parity by AAshlp , 16
Number by Region as compared to number for Parity , 19
Percent of Parity by Region 20
Minority Women Managers GM 13-15:
Number by AAship as compared to number for Parity 21
Percent of Parity by AAship 22
Number by Region as compared to number for Parity 23
Percent of Parity by Region 24
Minority Managers (Minority men and minority women) GM 13-15:
Number by AAship as compared to number for Parity 25
Percent of Parity by AAship 26
Number by Region as compared to number for Parity 27
Percent of Parity by Region 28
Minority Men Managers GM 13-15:
Number by AAshlp as compared to number for Parity 29
Percent of Parity by AAshlp 30
Number by Region as compared to number for Parity 31
Percent of Parity by Region 32
-------
SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES):
Percent Minority (Minority men and minority women) SES 33
Percent Women (Minority women and nonmlnority women) ; 34
Agency-wide • Number MinorRies/Nonminority Women SES as compared to number for Parity 35
PARITY COMPARISON:
Minority SES (Minority men and Minority women) 36
Minority Men SES 37
Minority Women SES 38
Nonminorlty Women SES 39
FY 1992 MID-YEAR GOALS STATUS - PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE - GS/GM 13-15:
FY 1992 Agency-wide Goals vs Net Change - GS/GM 13-15 40
FY 1992 Agency-wide Goals vs Net Change - SES 41
PROFESSIONAL GOALS - GS/GM 13-15 -
By AAship:
Minority (Minority men and minority women) 42
Nonmlnority Women . 43
By Region:
Minority (Minority men and minority women) 44
Nonminority Women 45
ADMINISTRATIVE GOALS - GS/GM 13-15 -
By AAship:
. Minority (Minority men and minority women) 46
Nonminority Women 47
By Region:
Minority (Minority men and minority women) 48
Nonminority Women 49
DATA TABLES:
GM 13-15 Supervisors/Managers by AAship/Region by Race, Sex, and National Origin 50
SES by AAship/Region by Race, Sex, and National Origin 51
-------
-------
••>
WORK FORCE PROFILE
GM 13 - 15
-------
-------
m m m
PERCENT MINORITY MANAGERS
GM 13-15
OE
OAR
REGION 7
REGION 10
OPPE
OGC
ORD
OSWER
REGION 1
OW
REGION 3
REGION 8
OPPTS
REGION 2
REGION 6
OIA
OIG
REGION 5
OARM
REGION 9
OA
REGION 4
7.9
8.6
8.8
Agency
10.2%
10.6
3 11
a 11.1
14.3
3 14.7
17
17.2
16.2
a IJLJ_
10
Civilian
Labor
Force
21.6%
15
20
25
BELOW AGENCY
BELOW CLF
DATA SOURCE: EPAYS
AS OF: March 7, 1992
-------
PERCENT MINORITY MEN MANAGERS
GM 13-15
OIA
REGION 7
OAR
OPPE
OE
REGION 10
OWSER
ORD
OPPTS
OW
REGION 1
OGC
OA
REGION 3
OARM
REGION 9
REGION 2
REGION 6
REGION 8
OIG
REGION 5
REGION 4
0
==„
'
V»M^^^^^^
V
/
AGENCY
5.7%
«1 8.1
juwHtaeBBB****** . .
\
f^i \i i I ism
Labor
Force
11.8%
/
\
8
10
12
14
BELOW AGENCY
BELOW CLF
-------
PERCENT MINORITY WOMEN MANAGERS
GM 13-15
OE
OGC
REGION 8
OAR
REGION 10
ORD
REGION 1
OSWER
REGION 3
OPPE
REGION 7
REGION 2
REGION 6
OW
OIG
OPPTS
REGION 5
REGION 4
REGION 9
OARM
OA
OIA
0
0
0
•MS 1
••• 1.1
••••a 1.4
MHMHBI 1.8
ws^ammsssm 2.3
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^1 Z • 4
••••••^••H) 2.0
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^mB^^^^^^^B) 3
V
/
\
/
\
s
\
/
Agency )
4.6% :
s
\
/
\
/
%
/
\
/
\
/
\
/
\
TrmTmmWm7nmymmm--rrrrrrrri. »., :
^^X^^^M^^^^AS^S^ -, >
^^>>^>^^^^^^ . }
1.
\
^t****, jM******^ — .— M^^X
.^^^^^^^^^^ff^^^,
) 2 4
y
( Civilian
Labor
/ Force
J 9.8%
/
\
r
s
\4
'9.7
6 8 10 12 14 1
•1 BELOW AGENCY -...
BELOW CLF
DATA SOURCE: EPAYS
AS OF: March 7, 1992
-------
PERCENT NONMINORITY WOMEN MANAGERS
GM 13-15
DIG
OlA
ORD
REGION 2
REGION 4
OGC
OAR
REGION 10
REGION 3
REGION 8
REGION 7
REGION 6
REGION 1
OPPE
REGION 5
OE
OW
OARM
OPPTS
REGION 9
OA
OSWER
•r*r^*^-^Za
0
13,2
• 14.3
• 14.4
•• 14.8
•«• 16.2
Agency
24.8%
20
« 20.7
"• 22.2
• "•«• 23.4
—•• 23.6
•— 23.7
26.3
a 26
3 26.2
27.2
28.7
29.4
s-M 30.6
zzzza 31.3
zzzza 31.8
Civilian
Labor
Force
35.1%
10
BELOW AGENCY
20
30
40
50
BELOW CLF CH AT/ABOVE CLF
DATA SOURCE: EPAYS
AS OF: March 7, 1992
-------
m m m
PERCENT MINORITY MANAGERS GM 13-15
Sept 1991 as compared to March 1992
Agency 10.2%
10.6
OIG
OIA
OARM
18.1
OSWER
OAR
4
^^^^^^^~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^|^^
OPPTS
ORD
0
10
15 20
MARCH 1992
SEPT 1991
DATA SOURCE: EPAYS AS OF: March 7, 1992
Civilian
Labor
Force
21.6%
25
-------
PERCENT MINORITY MANAGERS 13-15
Sept 1991 as compared to March 1992
Agency
2%
17.1
19.1
10
SEPT 1991
15 20
MARCH 1992
Civilian
Labor
Force
21.6%
25
-------
PERCENT NONMINORITY WOMEN MANAGERS 13-15
Sept 1991 as compared to March 1992
OA
OPPE
OECM
OGC
OIG
OIA
OARM
OW
OSWER
OAR
OPPTS
ORD
P 32->i
ar are*
26.1
26.2
20
17
28.4
28.2
Agency
24.8%
6.1
29.4
R 29.3
•
28.7
10 20
SEPT 1991
Civilian
Labor
Force
35.1%
38.8
40
MARCH 1992
50
DATA SOURCE: EPAYS
OF: March 7, 1992
-------
PERCENT NONMINORITY WOMEN MANAGERS 13-15
Sept 1991 as compared to March 1992
o
25.7
26
Agency
24.8%
10
20
SEPT 1991
30
MARCH 1992
35.1%
40
-------
m
PERCENT OF MANAGEMENT HIRES
GM 13-15 Minorities/Nonminority Women
October 1, 1991 - March 7, 1992
REGION 3
REGION 10
OGC
OE
REGION 8
ORD
REGION 2
OW
OA
OIG
REGION 4
REGION 6
REGION 5
OPPTS
OARM
REGION 9
OSWER
OAR
REGION 7
OPPE
REGION 1
0
25
=> 33.3
37.6
37.6
J 33.9
=3 40
46.
46
20
40
AGENCY
GOAL
52% *
50
50
62.6
66.7
66.7
75
75
60
80
100
BELOW GOAL
I . I Within 2 points of Goal
AT/ABOVE GOAL
* Where underrepresented
-------
AASHIPS
MANAGEMENT HIRES VS OPPORTUNITIES
GM 13-15 Minorities/Nonminority Women
October 1, 1991 - March 7, 1992
OPPORTUNITIES
52% GOAL
HIRES *
(Minorities)
(Nonminority women)
DATA SOURCE: EPAYS
Total Minorities/Nonminority women
10
-------
• m m
MANAGEMENT HIRES VS OPPORTUNITIES
GM 13-15 Minorities/Nonminority Women
October 1, 1991 - March 7, 1992
10-rl
8-
REGIONS 6
4-
2H
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
R10
OPPORTUNITIES
52% GOAL
HIRES *
4
2
3
8
4
2
2
1
0
18
9
7
11
6
5
5
3
2
6
3
4
9
5
2
8
4
4
4
2
0
(Minorities)
(Nonminority women)
2
1
1
1
0
0
4
3
1
4
2
0
1
3
0
4
0
0
DATA SOURCE: EPAYS
Total Minorities/Nonminority women
I I
-------
NUMBER MINORITIES/WHITE WOMEN MANAGERS
GM 13-15
Number
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
PARITY
ON BOARD
WHITE WOMEN
MINORITY WOMEN
MINORITY MEN
PARITY
ON BOARD
1088
767
304
172
366
139
DATA SOURCE: EPAYS (March 21, 1992)
-------
m m m m m m at
Number 200
NUMBER WOMEN MANAGERS GM 13-15
COMPARED TO NUMBER FOR PARITY
PARITY
ON BOARD
PARITY
ON BOARD
-------
PERCENT OF PARITY
WOMEN MANAGERS GM 13-15
AASHIPS
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
m m m
-------
Number 100
80
60
40
20
Regions
0
NUMBER WOMEN MANAGERS GM 13-15
COMPARED TO NUMBER FOR PARITY
1
REGIONS
8
10
PARITY
ON BOARD
83
51
62
24
58
33
80
43
71
54
45
28
34
20
37
19
58
52
41
21
PARITY
ON BOARD
15
-------
PERCENT OF PARITY
WOMEN MANAGERS GM 13-15
REGIONS
20
40
60
80
100
120
-------
NUMBER NONMINORITY WOMEN MANAGERS
GM 13-15 COMPARED TO NUMBER FOR PARITY
AS OF: MARCH 7, 1992
140
PARITY
ON BOARD
DATA SOURCE: EPAYS
PARITY
ON BOARD
IT
-------
PERCENT OF PARITY
NONMINORITY WOMEN MANAGERS GM 13-15
AASHIPS
0
20 40
60
80 100 120 140
-------
fljj^^^Wp ^PI^^BB ^HHI^^V ^^^^^^P ^^^^^^B
NUMBER NONMINORITY WOMEN MANAGERS
GM 13-15 COMPARED TO NUMBER FOR PARITY
AS OF: MARCH 7, 1992
REGIONS
PARITY
ON BOARD
DATA SOURCE: EPAYS
PARITY ••• ON BOARD
-------
PERCENT OF PARITY
NONMINORITY WOMEN MANAGERS GM 13-15
REGIONS
0
20
40
60
80
100
on
-*- W
-------
Number 70
60
NUMBER MINORITY MANAGERS GM 13-15
COMPARED TO NUMBER FOR PARITY
AASHIPS
PARITY
ON BOARD
PARITY
ON BOARD
-------
PERCENT OF PARITY
MINORITY MANAGERS GM 13-15
AASHIPS
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
-------
NUMBER MINORITY MANAGERS GM 13-15
COMPARED TO NUMBER FOR PARITY
REGIONS
PARITY
ON BOARD
PARITY IB ON BOARD
23
-------
PERCENT OF PARITY
MINORITY MANAGERS GM 13-15
REGIONS
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
24
-------
NUMBER MINORITY WOMEN MANAGERS
GM 13 - 15
Number
50
40
30
20
10
0
AASHIPS
OA
OPPE
OE
OGC
OIG
OIA
OARM
OW
OSWER
OAR
OPPTS
ORD
PARITY
ON BOARD
8
8
5
1
9
0
3
0
7
4
1
1
39
37
18
6
22
4
22
2
29
17
37
5
PARITY
ON BOARD
25
-------
PERCENT OF RARITY
MINORITY WOMEN MANAGERS GM 13-15
AASHIPS
OA
OIA
OARM
OPPTS
OIG
OW
OPPE
OSWER
ORD
OAR
OE
OGC
33.3
20
40
60
80
100
120
26
-------
NUMBER MINORITY WOMEN MANAGERS
GM 13 - 15
Number
20
15
10
0
REGIONS
REGIONS
8
10
PARITY
ON BOARD
19
3
14
4
13
3
18
16
17
11
10
3
8
2
8
0
13
12
9
1
PARITY
ON BOARD
21
-------
PERCENT OF PARITY
MINORITY WOMEN MANAGERS GM 13-15
REGIONS
8
20
40
60
80
100
120
,28
-------
NUMBER MINORITY MEN MANAGERS
GM 13-15
AASHIPS
PARITY
ON BOARD
PARITY
ON BOARD
29
-------
PERCENT OF PARITY
MINORITY MEN MANAGERS GM 13
AASHIPS
-15
20
40
60
80
100
30.
-------
NUMBER MINORITY MEN MANAGERS
GM 13 - 15
Number
25
20
15
10
5
0
REGIONS
REGIONS
4
8
10
PARITY
ON BOARD
22
9
16
11
15
8
21
18
19
14
12
8
9
1
10
7
15
10
11
3
PARITY
ON BOARD
31
-------
PERCENT OF PARITY
MINORITY MEN MANAGERS GM 13-15
REGIONS
5
8
2
6
9
3
1
10
7
85.7
53.3
40.9
27.3
11.1
0
20
40
60
80
100
-------
MINORITIES
and
NONMINORITY
WOMEN
-------
-------
PERCENT MINORITY SES MANAGERS
REGION 1
REGION 3
REGION 6
REGION 7
REGION S
REGION 9
REGION 10
ORD
OAR
OW
OIA
OE
OPPE
OPPTS
OSWER
OA
REGION 5
REGION 2
OGC
REGION 4
OIG
OARM
0
0
0
0
t ll
•
I o
1 °
t| Q
0
0
0
0
. .
- -- - ••
•"
X
AGENCY
4 7%
(
Mi 6.6
MPHl 8.3
/
|
Civilian
Labor
Force
21.6%
c
0
10
15
20
25
BELOW AGENCY
BELOW CLF
33
-------
PERCENT WOMEN SES MANAGERS
OIA
ORD
REGION 4
REGION 6
REGION 7
REGION 8
REGION 9
REGION 10
REGION 5
REGION 3
OE
OARM
OIG
OAR
REGION 2
OSWER
OPPE
OW
OPPTS
OGC
OA
REGION 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
^^
\
AGENCY
19.1%
3 20
V
Civilian
Labor
Force
45.0%
X
^ 9
10
20
30
40
50
60
BELOW AGENCY
BELOW CLF
34
-------
I* t
NUMBER MINORITIES/WHITE WOMEN SES
AS COMPARED TO THE NUMBER FOR PARITY
WHITE WOMEN
100
80
60
40
20
# PARITY
# ACTUAL
* % of Parity
# PARITY K2 # ACTUAL
MINOR TY MEN
MINORITY WOMEN
30
Q2 --- (41.3*)* ----
34
12
(3^.3%)*
35
-------
NUMBER MINORITY SES
AS COMPARED TO THE NUMBER FOR PARITY
# PARITY K2 # ACTUAL *
# POSITIONS 16 9 16 8 6 3 28 22 18 20 25 32 7 9 9 7 11 7 6 5 7 6
# PARITY 42421 1 6544572222221 1 21
FACTUAL* 1001 105010100101100000
m m
-------
NUMBER MINORITY MEN SES
AS COMPARED TO THE NUMBER FOR PARITY
Number
PARITY R2# ACTUAL *
IIJUJIUUJLLJLULJJLLILUO
occococciriECEiruJ
cc
# POSITIONS 16 9 16 8 6 3 28 22 18 20 25 32 7 9 9 7 11
# PARITY
# ACTUAL *
21211033223411111
10011040101001011
76576
11111
00000
37
-------
NUMBER MINORITY WOMEN SES
AS COMPARED TO THE NUMBER FOR PARITY
Number
a.
O
OOOCJOGOOO
UJLUUIUJlilUJUJllJUJ
DCOCDCOCDCCECCCCa:
o
o
UJ
cc
# POSITIONS 16 9 16 8 6 3 28 22 18 20 25 32 7 9 9 711 7 6 5 7 6
# PARITY 2121103222231111111011
FACTUAL* 0000001000000000000000
• m «"*•
-------
NUMBER NONMINORITY WOMEN SES
AS COMPARED TO THE NUMBER FOR PARITY
Number
12
I* PARITY US FACTUAL*
< UJ UJ Q CD
O g. O
o
g 6 3
Q
DC
r- CM CO
Z Z Z
10 to r- co en
Z Z Z Z Z
Q.
O
CJOCDOCDC5OC5C3 —
LUUJUJLUL1JUJUJUJUJC7
cctrtrcccctEiraiccuJ
cc
# POSITIONS 16 9 16 8 6 3 28 22 18 20 25 32 7 9 9 7 11 7 6 5 7 6
# PARITY 636321 10 8679 11 2332422222
FACTUAL* 6223103544823210102021
39
-------
-------
* *
FY1992
GOALS STATUS
-------
-------
FY 1992 MID YEAR GOALS STATUS
GRADES 13-15 AGENCY-WIDE
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PROFESSIONAL
Goals
Net Change
ADMINISTRATIVE
27
36
3
69
MINORITIES WOMEN i
Sept 21, 1991 - March 21, 1992
Data Source: FY 92 AEP Plan Update
Goals HP Net Change
Status • Net numerical change between
Sept 21, 1991 and March 21, 1992
40
-------
-------
FY 1992 MID YEAR GOALS STATUS
SES AGENCY-WIDE
Sept 21, 1991 - March 21, 1992
PROFESSIONAL
Goals
Net Change
ADMINISTRATIVE
MINORITIES
Goals
Net Change
Data Source: FY 92 AEP Plan Update and Status • Net numerical change between
EPAYS March 21, 1992 Sept 21, 1991 and March 21, 1992
41
-------
FY 1992 MID YEAR GOALS STATUS
PROFESSIONAL GOALS/GRADES 13-15
Sept 21, 1991 - March 21, 1992
10
Minority
Men
and
Women
AASHIPS
OGC
MIN Goals
MIN Net Change
OIA
m
OARM
m.
OW
OAR
OPPTS
MIN Goals
MIN Net Change
0
3
0
0
0
3
0
2
0
2
0
3
Data Source: FY 92 AEP Plan Update
Status • Net-numerical change between
Sept 21, 1991 and March 21, 1992
-------
FY 1992 MID YEAR GOALS STATUS
PROFESSIONAL GOALS/GRADES 13-15
Sept 21, 1991 - March 21, 1992
NON
MINORITY
WOMEN
-2
AASHIPS-4
OPPE
1
1
1
1
mm
uoais
Net C
I
ha
|
age
OIG
ORD
OA
OE
3SWBB
OGC
OIA
OARM
OW
OAR
OPPTS
Goals
Net Change
1
0
1
2
0
0
0
7
0
-3
0
1
0
0
0
-1
0
3
0
5
0
7
Data Source: FY 92 AEP Plan Update
Status • Net numerical change between
Sept 21, 1991 and March 21, 1992
-------
Minority
Men
and
Women
10
REGIONS
FY 1992 MID YEAR GOALS STATUS
PROFESSIONAL GOALS/GRADES 13-15
Sept 21, 1991 - March 21, 1992
MIN Goals
MIN Net
i
i
•
1
10
•
MIN Goals
MIN Net Change
5
9
3
4
2
0
2
0
0
3
0
5
0
4
0
9
0
.1
0
2
Data Source: FY 92 AEP Plan Update
Status • Net numerical change between
Sept 21, 1991 and March 21, 1992
44
-------
FY 1992 MID YEAR GOALS STATUS
PROFESSIONAL GOALS/GRADES 13-15
Sept 21, 1991 - March 21, 1992
NON
MINORITY5
WOMEN"
REGIONS °
I
I
I
Goals
Net Change
m
I
Goals
Net Change
0
2
0
4
0
7
0
6
0
1
0
1
Data Source: FY 92 AEP Plan Update
Status • Net numerical change between
Sept 21, 1991 and March 21, 1992
45
-------
FY 1992 MID YEAR GOALS STATUS
ADMINISTRATIVE GOALS/GRADES 13-15
Minority
Men
and
Women
12
10
AASHIPS
Sept 21, 1991 - March 21, 1992
MIN Goals
MIN Net Change
OGC
OIA
OARM
I
I
OW
OAR
QPPTS
MIN Goals
MIN Net Change
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
2
0
2
0
2
Data Source: FY 92 AEP Plan Update
Status • Net numerical change between
Sept 21, 1991 and March 21, 1992
46
-------
10
NON
MINORITY,
WOMEN4
AASHIPS-
FY 1992 MID YEAR GOALS STATUS
ADMINISTRATIVE GOALS/GRADES 13-15
Sept 21, 1991 - March 21, 1992
DIG
OE
W
I
OA
Goals
Net Change
OPPE
OGC
OIA
OARM
OW
5SWER
OAR
OPPTS
•
w.
ORD
Goals
Net Change
1
0
1
3
0
3
0
-3
0
0
0
2
0
3
0
1
0
8
0
7
0
9
0
1
Data Source: FY 92 AEP Plan Update
Status * Net numerical change between
Sept 21, 1991 and March 21, 1992
47
-------
FY 1992 MID YEAR GOALS STATUS
ADMINISTRATIVE GOALS/GRADES 13-15
Minority
Men
and
Women
REGIONS
Sept 21, 1991 - March 21, 1992
11
MIN Goals
MIN Net Change
I
•
I
MIN Goals
MIN Net Change
0
1
0
3
0
2
0
2
0
1
Data Source: FY 92 AEP Plan Update
Status • Net numerical change between
Sept 21, 1991 and March 21, 1992
48
-------
Pi p
10
NON
MINORITY
WOMEN1
REGIONS •
FY 1992 MID YEAR GOALS STATUS
ADMINISTRATIVE GOALS/GRADES 13-15
Sept 21, 1991 - March 21, 1992
Goals
Net Change
m
I
w
9
III
m
10
Goals
Net Change
1
5
0
5
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
1
0
3
0
5
0
9
Data Source: PY 92 AEP Plan Update
Status • Net numerical change between
Sept 21, 1991 and March 21, 1992
49
-------
GM 13 - IS SUPERVISORS/MANAGERS
100 ADMIN
210 OPPE
220 OECM
230 OGC
240 DIG
260 INT ACT
300 OARH
400 WATER
500 OSWER
600 AIR RAD
700 OPTS
800 ORD
901 REG 1
902 REG 2
903 REG 3
904 REG 4
905 REG 5
906 REG 6
907 REG 7
908*1 REG 8
909 REG 9
910 REG 10
TOTAL
AMERICAN
INDIAN
F
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
M
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
ASIAN
F
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
1
1
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
9
1
23
M
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
6
3
1
4
9
6
3
0
2
5
0
0
1
7
1
51
BLACK
F
6
1
0
0
5
0
32
5
2
1
11
4
0
1
1
15
11
3
2
0
1
0
101
M
3
1
1
1
2
0
19
0
2
3
7
1
3
3
6
12
9
3
1
3
1
1
82
HISPNAIC
F
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
0
2
0
15
M
0
0
0
0
3
0
7
1
2
1
1
3
1
4
2
3
1
5
0
3
2
1
40
WHITE
F
20
11
21
4
9
1
108
48
83
46
80
49
51
19
32
27
43
25
19
19
40
20
775
M
32
29
50
14
49
5
202
106
115
155
155
282
124
99
87
114
93
64
54
56
67
66
2018
TOTAL
64
42
73
19
69
7
373
167
209
208
264
348
188
132
130
175
163
101
76
82
129
90
3109
DATA SOURCE: EPAVS (APRIL 18, 1992)
-------
p f"
100 ADMIN
210 OPPE
220 OECM
230 OGC
240 OIG
260 INT ACT
300 OARM
400 WATER
500 OSWER
600 AIR RAD
700 OPTS
800 ORD
901 REG 1
902 REG 2
903 REG 3
904 REG 4
905 REG 5
906 REG 6
907 REG 7
908 REG 8
909 REG 9
910 REG 10
TOTAL
ASIAN
M
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
BLACK
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
M
1
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
10
HISPANIC
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
WHITE
F
6
2
1
3
1
0
3
5
4
4
8
2
3
2
1
0
1
0
2
1
2
1
52
M
8
6
14
4
4
3
20
17
13
16
15
30
4
6
8
6
9
8
4
5
5
5
210
TOTAL
15
8
15
8
6
3
28
22
18
20
24
32
7
9
9
7
11
8
6
6
7
6
275
DATA SOURCE: EPAYS (APRIL 18, 1992)
51
-------
------- |