8503-oco I
    SUPERFUN
    FINANCIAL
    ASSESSMEN
    SYSTEM	





-------
8503 - OOo  I
           SUPERFUND FINANCIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
                     INSTRUCTION MANUAL
                        Prep'ared for

                 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS DIVISION
          OFFICE OF POLICY AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
            U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                        Prepared by

             INDUSTRIAL  ECONOMICS, INCORPORATED
                     30  BOYLSTON STREET
               CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS  02138
                        25 May 1982

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1
 KEYPOINTS TO REMEMBER	 1

     Introduction	 1
     Key Features of the System	 1
     Organization of the Manual	 3


CHAPTER 2
 SIGN-ON PROCEDURE	 4

     Introduction	 4
     Signing on the System	 4
     Accessing the Program	 6
     Aborting the Program	 6


CHAPTER 3
 COMPILING THE DATA	 9

     Introdution	 9
     Compiling the Required Data	 9
     Examples of Data Sources	15


CHAPTER 4
 ENTERING THE DATA	33

     Introduction	33
     Initial Data	34
     Rules for Entering Financial Data	35
     The Financial Data	37
     Correcting Input Errors	38


CHAPTER 5
 OUTPUT OF FINANCIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM	46

     Introduction	46
     Calculation of Ability to Pay	47
     Financial Ratios	48
     Intermediate Calculations	50

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS  (continued)
APPENDIX A
 ESTIMATING NET INCOME FOR ADDITIONAL YEARS	57


APPENDIX B
 UPDATING KEY PARAMETERS	61

     Introduction	61
     Tax Rate. . .	62
     Depreciation to Fixed Assets	62
     Interest Rate	62
     Reinvestment Rate	63
     Exponential Smoothing Factor.	63
     Updating the Estimate	64

-------
TABLE OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 2-1
 SAMPLE OF SIGN-ON PROCEDURE	  8


EXHIBIT 3-1
 WORKSHEET	22

EXHIBIT 3-2
 EFFECTS OF MISSING DATA	23

EXHIBIT 3-3
 VALUE LINE REPORT	24

EXHIBIT 3-4
 WORKSHEET	25

EXHIBIT 3-5
 EXCERPT FROM DUN & BRADSTREET REPORT	26

EXHIBIT 3-6
 WORKSHEET	27

EXHIBIT 3-7A
 ANNUAL REPORT INCOME STATEMENT	28

EXHIBIT 3-7B
 ANNUAL REPORT BALANCE SHEET	29
                    *
EXHIBIT 3-7C
 ANNUAL REPORT STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION..30

EXHIBIT 3-7D
 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT	31

EXHIBIT 3-8
 WORKSHEET	32


EXHIBIT 4-1
 INITIAL DATA ENTRY	40

EXHIBIT 4-2
 FINANCIAL DATA ENTRY	41

-------
TABLE OF EXHIBITS  (continued)
EXHIBIT 4-3
 SUMMARY OF DATA	43

EXHIBIT 4-4
 CORRECTING ERRORS	44

EXHIBIT 4-5
 SUMMARY OF DATA	45


EXHIBIT 5-1
 AFFORDABLE REMEDIAL ACTION COSTS	52

EXHIBIT 5-2
 FINANCIAL RATIOS	53

EXHIBIT 5-3
 FINANCIAL WARNING	54

EXHIBIT 5-4
 INTERMEDIATE CALCULATIONS	55
 4

EXHIBIT A-l
 DUN & BRADSTREET REPORT	,	59

EXHIBIT A-2
 WORKSHEET	60


EXHIBIT B-l
 UPDATING THE KEY PARAMETERS	66

-------
KEYPOINTS TO REMEMBER
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION

     This manual provides step-by-step instructions in the
use of the Superfund Financial Assessment System.  The com-
panion document, the Technical Support Document, describes
the design and the underlying rationale of the system and
the interpretation of the results.

     This chapter describes the key features which the an-
alyst should bear in mind when using the Superfund Financial
Assessment System.  The organization of the remainder of
this manual is then provided.
KEY FEATURES OF THE SYSTEM

     The Superfund Financial Assessment System is an inter-
active system designed to calculate the remedial action
costs affordable by'the firm.  The system asks the user to
provide certain data on the firm being analyzed.  This data
may be found in one of the following sources:

     •    The company's annual reports or 10K state-
          ments filed with the Securities and Exchange
          Commission (SEC),

     •    A Value Line report on the firm, or

     •    A Dun & Bradstreet Business Information
          Report.

-------
                             -2-
If data are not available from these sources, the necessary
data should be requested "from the company.

     After gathering the data, the data should be entered
into the system.  At least three years of income data must
be entered or the system will not operate.
     The following rules should be remembered when entering
the data:

     •    The carriage return should be pushed after
          each data entry.

     •    Non-numeric data may be entered for case
          name, party name, date case was filed,
          location, and today's date.  The dates
          are limited to 8 characters? while the
          names and locations 'are limited to 20
          characters.

     •    Omit dollar signs, percentage signs,
          commas, and other non-numeric data when
          entering financial data.

     »    All decimal points should be included.

     •    Enter 999.9 when financial data are un-
          known.  Enter "unknown" for non-numeric
          data which are not known.

     •    If any actual financial data have values
          between 999.0 and 999.999, round these
          values to 1000.0.

     •    Do not convert data to constant dollar
          equivalents.

     •    Use consistent units.

     •    The tax rate may be entered either in per-
          centage form (46.0) or decimal form (0.46).
          If a tax rate greater than 100.0 is entered,
          a default rate of 40.0 percent will be used
          instead.

-------
                             -3-
     •    To correct data before the RETURN key
          is pushed, press the BACKSPACE key or
          hold the CONTROL key down and press H
          to backspace to the appropriate place
          and re-enter the data.

     The system then uses these data to compute the afford-
able remedial action costs and three financial ratios.
ORGANIZATION OF MANUAL

     The remainder of the Instruction Manual is organized
as follows:

     Chapter 2 describes the sign-on procedure
     for EPA's IBM system.

     Chapter 3 reviews the compilation of the
     necessary data.

     Chapter 4 provides detailed instructions
     for entering the data.

     Chapter 5 describes the resulting output
     from the system.

     Appendix A discusses some suggestions for
     estimating income data when these data are
     not available.

     Appendix B describes how the system pro-
     grammer can update key parameters in the
     system.

The exhibits to each chapter and appendix are located at the
end of the chapter or appendix.

     The companion document, the Technical Support Document,
describes the rationale behind this system, the supporting
evidence from the literature, and the interpretation of the
results.

-------
SIGN-ON PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 2
INTRODUCTION

     This chapter reviews the procedure for signing on to
the EPA IBM computer system and for accessing the Superfund
Financial Assessment System.  Procedures for aborting the
session are also provided.  Should the analyst encounter
difficulties in accessing the system, the analyst should
consult David Erickson, Economic Analysis Division, Office
of Policy and Resource Management.
SIGNING ON THE SYSTEM

     Exhibit 2-1 provides a sample of signing on the EPA
IBM system.  All responses required by the user are under-
lined.  Each step of the sign-on procedure is reviewed below.
After entering the response required at each step, the ana-
lyst should push the RETURN key.

     1.   Dialing in to the system;  The user should
          dial the appropriate local phone number to
          access the system.  In Washington D.C. this
          phone number is currently 488-15151. ^ loud
          piercing tone is heard when the system has
          been reached.  The telephone receiver should
          then be placed into the coupler and the RETURN
          key pushed.
 This number may be periodically changed.  Check with User
 Services at EPA if no response occurs at this number.

-------
                             -5-
          If the computer terminal is hardwired to
          the IBM system, the analyst need not use.
          the telephone to access the system.  The
          terminal need only be turned on and the
          RETURN key pushed.

          Enter terminal identifier1:  Once the an-
          alyst has dialed into the computer, the
          computer will respond by asking you to
          "PLEASE TYPE YOUR TERMINAL IDENTIFIER."
          For most standard terminals, the user
          should respond by typing A.  If the ter-
          minal is not standard, the user should
          consult User Services for the appropriate
          terminal identifier.

          Login Procedure:  The computer will now
          respond by printing the remote access
          mode and port number of your terminal
          "NNNN-PPP" and then ask the analyst to
          "PLEASE LOG IN:".  To log in the analyst
          should hold down the CONTROL key and type
          H.  The analyst should then release the
          CONTROL key and type IBMEPA1;NCC.2

          Entering the time sharingmode;  The com-
          puter will now respond with the number of
          the host computer port, "P ###" and "IBM1
          IS ON LINE".  The analyst now types TSO
          to enter the time sharing mode on the com-
          puter.

          Logging on the computer:  The computer will
          now ask the analyst to "ENTER LOGON".  The
          analyst should type LOGON EPADME/SFUND.
l-Some terminals at EPA may skip this step and step 3 of the
 procedure.  In this case, the analyst should skip to step
 4 and enter TSO in response to the computer's question
 "TSO or OBS."

2Pressing the CONTROL and FI suppresses the echoing of the
 characters being typed on this line.  If the analyst fails
 to type CONTROL H, the computer will still respond to the
 IBMEPA1 but it will be echo back to the user as IIBBMMEE-
 PPAA11.  This does not present a problem and the user should
 continue.

-------
                             -6-
           Entering the account number;  Finally,
           the computer will ask for the account
           number "ENTER ACCTUID NUMBER-".  The
           analyst should enter the account number
           "XXXXXXXXX".1

           System responds;  The system will now
           respond by printing that logon is now
           in process and relaying any system
           messages.  When the system is ready, the
           word "READY" will appear.  The analyst
           may now access the Superfund Financial
           Assessment System.
ACCESSING THE PROGRAM

     Once the computer responds with "READY" the user may
access the Superfund Financial Assessment System.  As indi-
cated in Exhibit 2-1, to access this system, the user types
SPFUND and then pushes the carriage return.  At this point
the interactive program begins to function and the program
will ask the user for specific data.  These data and ex-
amples of the program operation are provided in detail in
the next two chapters.
ABORTING THE PROGRAM

     If the user encounters any difficulties with the system
and wishes to abort the session, certain procedures should
be followed.  If the analyst is not yet logged on to the
system {that is, the system has not responded that the logon
is in progress), the analyst may simply hang up and redial
the phone.  If the system has printed "READY" and the user
decides to stop the session, the word LOGOFF should be typed
in, followed by a carriage return.  LOGOFF should also be
typed when the program has completed its analysis and re-
sponded again with "READY".2  Finally, if the user wishes
-'-The account number may be obtained from David Erickson,
 Economic Analysis Division.
2If the user wants to run the program again, he should type
 SPFUND.

-------
                             -7-
to stop the program in mid-operation, the user should push
the BREAK key.l  After pushing the BREAK key, the computer
will again respond "READY", the user may then enter LOGOFF
to exit the system or SPFUND to restart the program.
    the BREAK key does not terminate the program, check
 with User Services for the appropriate way of stopping
 the program.

-------
                                                                 — fi —
                                                  00
                                                  03
                                                  O
                                                  N
                                                  or
                                                  QL
                                                  Q
                                                  cn
                                                  LU
 I
CM
•s
w
       N
<*•  in n
h-  h- h-
or  or or
UJ  UJ UI
_J  _J -1

UI  UI LU Or
cn  cn tn «x
          or
 t   i   i  m
                                                            oo
                                                            en
                                                            N
    - c
••H
01
On 1 0|
>. |fj O
*J ("- •— '
o
01 I 01
ui CO in
re •>-* re co
01 *4' QI n
t-i fvj  (- Z
••H O» O
r o +* a
to cn c o
!-• J— 01 _l

z
0

in
P3
• •
03
in
> »
o
rH

J—

r z
Q
 LU I
X J- I
u z I
n LU S
u
_i a s:
l-H UJ
a: » ^-
o. z cn

H cn
z a
a z o
^4 I™"
CO X
in cn Q
 z) tn
a <*• m »H
or • z: _j _j
Q. ^ CD > U
HH 3 •
z u. i s 
Q x. X X « Q

                                                                                                   Cfl
                                                                                                   CJ
                                                                                                  •i-l



                                                                                                  I

-------
COMPILING THE DATA
CHAPTER 3
INTRODUCTION

     This chapter describes procedures for compiling the data
required to run the financial assessment system.  -The first
section identifies the types of data required and describes
potential sources for the required data  (including Annual Re-
ports, Value Line and Dun & Bradstreet).  The next section
provides sample copies and worksheets containing data from
each of these sources.

     The user may find it convenient to compile all the re-
quired data in a single place before beginning to use the
program.  A worksheet which organizes the data in a conven-
ient format is provided as Exhibit 3-1.1
COMPILING THE REQUIRED DATA

     The financial assessment system requires financial data
on the subject firm for some recent time period.  The re-
quired data may be obtained from the firm's own financial
statements (for example, as shown in Annual Reports or in
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)),
or from such services as Dun & Bradstreet or Value Line.
^Exhibits can be found at the end of the chapter.

-------
                              -10-
     Dun & Bradstreet's Business Information Reports  (D&B)
is a confidential service providing credit ancT other types
of information on a large number of companies.  Subscribers
to the service have access to reports which include infor-
mation on personnel,,, financial condition; credit record,
operations and history of the firm.  D&B usually provides 3
years of financial data for each firm.  EPA's Office of Waste
Programs Enforcement has a subscription to the service.  Re-
ports on individual firms may be ordered by contacting Kathy
Summerlee.

     The Value Line Investment Survey is a loose-leaf service
reporting on approximately 1500 firms with publicly-traded
stocks.  A single-page report on each company includes key
financial data for a 10 year period.  The service is updated
on a rotating basis, with the report on each company being
revised quarterly.  The data reported in Value Line may also
be obtained from the firm's published financial statements,
but the Value Line Investment Survey provides the data in a
consistent and convenient format.

     Other financial services which may provide published
financial data in a convenient format include:

     •    Moody's Investors Service, Moody*s Industrial
          Manual,

     •    Moody's Investors Service, Moody's OTC Indus-
          trial Manual,

     •    Standard & Poor's Standard Corporate Descrip-
          tions ,

     •    Standard & Poor's N.Y.S.E. Stock Reports,

     •    Standard & Poor's A.S.E. Stock Reports, and

     •    Standard & Poor's Over-the-Counter and Regional
          Exchange Stock Reports.
    _ Some of the firms of interest may not publish financial
statements, especially if their stocks are not traded pub-
licly.  In other.cases, the firm of interest is a subsidiary
of a larger firm and its financial statements are consolidated

-------
                             -11-
with those of the larger company.1  In the latter case, it
is appropriate to use the parent company's financial data
in the program since the parent will generally be respon-
sible for the liabilities of the subsidiary and the parent
firm's ability to pay remedial action costs may determine
the potential for recovery of these costs.  Where neither
the firm itself nor a parent firm publishes financial state-
ments, D&B is likely to be the only available source of
financial data.

     The financial assessment system requires a minimum of
three and preferably five years of annual data on net in-
come and depreciation.  In addition, data on financial con-
dition for the most recent year are required.  In general,
income statements data should be obtained for the most
recent complete fiscal year and for two to four previous
years.2  The balance sheet data used should be that reported
as of the end of the most recent complete fiscal year, to be
consistent with the income statement data used.

     In general, use of data from a single source is pre-
ferred.  If data are compiled from several different sources,
care must be taken to ensure that dollar figures are ex-
pressed in the same units, consistent time periods are
covered, and the definition of "net income" and other finan-
cial terms is the same.

     It may not be possible to obtain all of the data re-
quested by the program for a particular firm.  The program
is designed to make whatever calculations are possible when
some of the data are not available.  Exhibit 3-2 indicates
which calculations will be omitted if the indicated data are
not provided.
 -One of two sources may be consulted to identify affiliated
 companies:  the Directory of Corporate Affiliations  {Nation
 al Register Publications Co.)or Funk & Scott Index of
 Corporate Change  (Predicasts, Inc.).

 it is less desirable to use quarterly data restated to an
 annual basis, even if quarterly data are available for more
 recent periods.  Quarterly results may be quite unrepre-
 sentative if the business' earnings are subject to seasonal
 fluctuations.

-------
     The remainder of this section describes the types of
data required.
Net Income

     After-tax income is reported on a firm's annual income
statement or may be obtained from Dun & Bradstreet or Value
Line Reports.  Net income may also be referred to as after-
tax "profit", and is equal to revenues less operating costs,
other accrued expenses, interest and taxes.

     Data on net income are needed for a minimum of three
years for the program to calculate the firm's cash flow and
then estimate the amount the firm could afford to pay for
remedial action.  If data on income are not available, the
program will calculate one of the financial ratios (ratio of
total liabilities to net worth), but will skip calculations
of the other ratios and the estimate of affordable remedial
action costs.

     Because so many of the program's calculations require
data on net income, every effort should be made to obtain
the minimum three years of data.  If data are available only
for one year, however, the user may estimate income for the
other years in order to run the program.  An example of such
an estimate is provided in Appendix A to this manual.  The
user should keep in mind that the data used will reflect
only one year's results accurately and will in most cases
understate the true variability of the firm's earnings.  The
effect will likely be to overstate the firm's ability to pay
remedial action costs, as described in Appendix A.

     Notes to the financial statements may indicate that the
results for a particular year are significantly affected by
some unusual event, such as gain on a sale of assets or a
loss due to discontinuation of a subsidiary.  If the event
in question is not representative of the firm's normal earn-
ings or losses, and therefore if future earnings are not
likely to be affected by similar events, the net income fig-
ures used should exclude the effects of those events where
possible.  An adjustment to income to account for extraordin-
ary earnings and losses is illustrated in the sample compila-
tion of data from an Annual Report provided in the next sec-
tion.

-------
                             -13-
Depreciation

     Depreciation is reported as an expense on an Income
Statement or may be obtained from Value Line.  Data on de-
preciation are needed for each year in which net income is
reported.

     Depreciation may in some cases be included in a single
"cost of operations" or "operating costs" figure in an In-
come Statement.  In that case, depreciation may be obtained
from a "Statement of Changes in Financial Position," where
it is reported as a source of internal funds.  Depreciation
may also be reported separately in the notes to the financial
statements.

     If depreciation is not reported separately and there-
fore cannot be provided, the program will estimate depreci-
ation as 5 percent of fixed assets annually  (if fixed assets
data are available) or as zero (if not).  This estimate will
be used only for purposes of calculating ability to pay; the
ratio of cash flow to total liabilities will not be calcu-
lated without actual data for depreciation.

     Amortization expenses, which reflect periodic write-off
of intangible or other assets (for example, patents or lease-
hold improvements), are similar to depreciation in that both
are non-cash expenses.  Where reported,' amortization should
be included in depreciation for purposes of this analysis.
Similarly, if depletion is reported, it should be added to
depreciation for the purposes of this analysis.
Fixed Assets

     Data on fixed assets are required only if data on de-
preciation are not available.  The program uses data on fixed
assets to estimate a value for depreciation.  The year-end
value of assets can be obtained from the "Assets" side of the
balance sheet.  Current assets (including cash, accounts re-
ceivables, inventories, prepayments and the like) should not
be included in fixed assets.  Fixed assets include such items
1See the Technical Support Document for a discussion of this
 ratio.

-------
                            -14-
as property, equipment and intangible assets.  Some sources
report only "current assets" (or several categories of cur-
rent assets) and "other assets."  In those cases, the "other
assets" figure should be used.


Current Liabilities

     Current liabilities are needed only for the final year.
Current liabilities include all obligations falling due with-
in one year, including accounts payable, short-term debt and
the portion of long-term debt due within the year.  Total
current liabilities may be obtained from the "Liability and
Stockholders' Equity" side of a balance sheet.


Long-Term Liabilities

     Long-term liabilities are needed for the final year only
and are obtained from the "Liability and Stockholders' Equity"
side of the balance sheet, or from Value Line or D&B.  "Long-
term debt" is the most common long-term liability.  Deferred
taxes and other deferred items may also be reported.  Where
data are obtained from a balance sheet, long-term liabilities
can be calculated as all liabilities reported on the "Liability
and Stockholders' Equity" side except current liabilities and
Stockholders' Equity.!
Net Worth

     Net worth as of the end of the year can be obtained from
a balance sheet or from Value Line or D&B.  Net worth is cal-
culated as total assets less total liabilities  (current and
long-term).
^-Stockholders' Equity includes common stock  (par value, addi-
 tional paid in capital and retained earnings) less the value
 of treasury stock  (if any).  Preferred stock should be treat-
 ed as a long-term  liability.

-------
                             -15-
Interest Expense

     Interest expense for the final year can be obtained
from the firm's Income Statement or can be calculated from
information provided in Value Line reports.
Tax Rate

     The tax rate for the final year should be calculated
by dividing taxes (as reported on an Income Statement) by
pretax income.  The tax rate can be obtained directly from
a Value Line report.  If a tax rate is not provided, the
program will use 40 percent as a default value.
EXAMPLES OP DATA SOURCES

     This section illustrates methods for compiling the re-
quired data using three sources.  The first two described—
Value Line and Dun & Bradstreet reports--are relatively
straightforward.  The third source--^a firm's reported finan-
cial statements—'-may be more complicated to use because data
are generally provided in more detail than in the other two.
The final example using Annual Reports illustrates some of
the complications that may arise.  Where the amounts in-
volved are minor, the adjustments described may not be worth
the additional effort they require.  If the adjustments
would significantly change the figures used, however, the
program's results will be more reliable if appropriate ad-
justments are made to the input data.
Value Line

     Value Line reports provide most of the data needed for
the financial assessment system in a convenient format. -*-
Exhibit 3-3 shows a Value Line report for Pfizer, Inc. as an
example.  Exhibit 3-4 is a sample worksheet completed with
data from the Pfizer Value Line report.  The circled numbers
lvalue Line uses a "d" placed in front of a figure to indicate
 a negative (deficit) number.

-------
                          -16-
identify the location in the Value Line report of the data
used for each line of the worksheet.  Most of the data items
are self-explanatory.  Note that years for which Value Line
estimates financial data (1981-1983) are not used—1980 is
the final year for which actual results are reported, and
hence is the final year of data used in the program.

     Interest expense is not reported directly in the Value
Line report.  However, because the Value Line report provides
a figure for "total interest coverage" (6B), interest expense
can be estimated.  Value Line calculates the ratio of oper-
ating income to interest expense.  Operating income can be
calculated using reported "operating margin" and "sales" data
(6A).  Therefore,

     Operating income = operating margin x sales

                      = 19.9%            x 3029.3
and
                        572.5
     interest expense = operating income *
  "total interest
   earned" ratio
                      - 572.5
                      = 119.3
T 4.8
This figure for interest expense is used by the program to
calculate a similar "interest coverage" ratio (based on total
income before taxes and interest rather than operating income)

     Note that no data are reported for fixed assets.  These
data are not needed by the program, however, because depre-
ciation data are available.
Dun and Bradstreet, Inc.

     D&B credit reports are likely to be the only source of
financial data for some of the companies investigated.  The
formats of D&B reports vary depending on the amount of infor-
mation published or reported by the company, its banks or
other sources.  Exhibit 3-5 shows the "Finance" section from

-------
                                     -17-
         a typical D&B report.  {The subject company's name'and other
         information from the report have been deleted to preserve
         confidentiality.)  Exhibit 3-6 is a completed worksheet for
         the sample D&B report.  The circled numbers identify the loca-
         tion of each data item in the sample D&B report.  Note that
         this sample does not report data on depreciation, interest
         expense or income tax rate, but does provide net income fig-
         ures for each of the three years.  Appendix A to this manual
         provides another sample D&B report in which required data on
         net income are not available for three years, to illustrate
         how net income might be estimated for missing years.

              Note that a D&B report may include two sections report-
         ing financial data, the typical "Finance" section illustrated
         in Exhibit 3-5 and a "Statement Update" section with more
         current but unreviewed financial data.  (The sample D&B re-
         port in Appendix A includes a "Statement Update" section.)
         If the data reported in the "Statement Update" section are
         for a full year, those figures should be used as well as the
         three years of data reported in the "Finance" section.
         These data should not be used if only part of a year is
         covered.
V
Annual  Report

      The  subject  company may  publish  annual  financial  re-
ports,  which can  be  obtained  from  the company  itself.   The
data  reported  in  Annual Reports  are also  available  for firms
with  publicly-traded stocks from required filings with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission.   SEC  10-K  reports  include
standard  financial data, often in  more detail  than  in  Annual
Reports,  and may  be  obtained  from  the SEC or from the  company.

      Exhibit 3-7  provides  copies of three standard  financial
reports from the  1981 Annual  Report of SCA Services, Inc.:
the Income  Statement (Exhibit 3-7A),  the  Balance Sheet (Ex-
hibit 3-7B) and a Statement of Changes in Financial Portion
 (Exhibit  3-7C).   The notes to the  financial  statements often
contain useful information for interpreting  the reported
data; excerpts from  the notes in SCA  Service's Annual  Report
are reproduced as Exhibit  3-7D.  Note that the financial
statements  report consolidated data for SCA  and its sub-
"sidiaries.  These statements  provide  the  appropriate data,
even  if the company  being  investigated is a  subsidiary of
SCA,  as long as the  parent corporation is potentially  liable

-------
                            -18-
for the activities of the subsidiary.

     Three years of data are provided on the Income State-
ment shown in Exhibit 3-7A.  Where possible additional data
should be obtained from historical Annual Reports.  Only
three years of data are used here to simplify the example.

     There is substantial variation in the level of detail
and format for reporting in financial statements.  The SCA
statements are typical, however, and they illustrate several
adjustments that may be required when data are compiled.
Exhibit 3-8 is a sample worksheet completed from data in the
SCA Annual Report.  The worksheet is filled out as if "XYZ,
Inc.", a hypothetical subsidiary of SCA Services, is the
party to the case in question.  The circled numbers and
notes in the worksheet margin identify where the required
data can be found in the financial statements.

     Net Income is obtained from the Income Statement.  Note
that income for 1979 includes two non-recurring items, which
are described in the Notes:  a write-off of claims receiv-
able (-$2000} and a gain on the sale of an investment (+$2925).
The reported income before-tax is adjusted to exclude the
effects of these unusual gains and losses, and taxes then
estimated, as follows:
     Reported income, before tax

     Plus unusual losses
      (write-off of claims receivable)

     Less unusual gains
      (gain on sale of investment)

     Adjusted income, before tax

     Less estimated income tax^

     Adjusted income, after tax
$13,522

  2,000


 (2,925)


$12,597

 (5,795)

$ 6,802
    the subsidiary is not wholly-owned by the parent company,
 the parent's liability may be limited to its ownership share
 of the subsidiary.

^Income taxes are estimated at the average tax rate (described
 below—in this case 46 percent).

-------
                            -19-
The purpose of this adjustment is to estimate what net in-
come would have been had these unusual events not occurred,
and therefore to base calculations of ability to pay on
more "typical" results.

     Depreciation expense is reported in the Income State-
ment.  Note that both depreciation and amortization are re-
ported in the sample Income Statement and the combined
figure is used in the program.  If depreciation/amortization
is not reported separately in the Income Statement, these
figures may be obtained from the Statement of Changes in
Financial Position or from the Notes.

     Fixed Assets data are not required because depreciation
is reported.  If these data were required, data reported in
the Balance Sheet would be used.  In the case of SCA Ser-
vices, the required figures for 1981 would be the sum of any
assets which are depreciated or amortized:  net property and
equipment ($178.0) plus net intangible assets ($23.8), for a
total of $201.8.  The Notes to the financial statement often
indicate whether an asset is being depreciated or amortized;
the use of the term "net" may also indicate that assets are
being written off over time.  In general, it is better to
locate actual data on depreciation in the financial statements
or the associated notes than to rely on the program's estimate
using fixed asset data.  In any case, as in SCA Services' fi-
nancial statement, data on fixed assets are often not reported
for the required minimum of three years.  In this case, his-
torical statements should be obtained if necessary.

     Current Liabilities can be obtained from the right-hand
side of the Balance Sheet.

     Long-Term Liabilities are also obtained from the right-
hand side of the Balance Sheet, and may often be most easily
calculated as:
     Total Liabilities and Stockholder's
      Equity1

     Less Current Liabilities

     Less Stockholders'  Equity

     Equals Long-Term Liabilities
$263.9

- 48.8

-130.3

$ 84.8
 The total of the right-hand side of the Balance Sheet.

-------
                            -20-
The same result would be obtained by adding all long-term
debt and other long-term liabilities (including deferred
taxes):
     Long-Terra Debt

     Minority Interest

     Deferred Income Taxes
$ 52.1

   2.4

  20.3
     Long-Term Liabilities                    $ 84.8

     Net Worth is calculated from the Balance Sheet as Total
Assets (the total of the left-hand side of the Balance Sheet)
less Total Liabilities (Current plus Long-term):
     Total Assets

     Less Current Liabilities

     Less Long-Term Liabilities

     Equals Net Worth
$263.9

- 48.8

- 84.8


$130.3
In many cases, such as SCA Services, net worth is actually
shown on the Balance Sheet as "Total Stockholders' Equity"
and need not be calculated.

     Interest Expense may be reported in the Income State-
ment, as it is in the SCA Services example.  The Income
Statement indicates that a net interest figure is reported;
the associated Notes state that interest earnings of $2.1 and
capitalized interest of $0.3 have been offset against interest
expenses of $7.6.  Where possible, gross rather than net in-
terest expense should be used—$7.6 in the SCA Services
example.

     Income Tax Rate may be estimated by calculating an
average tax rate, if income taxes are reported as an expense
in the Income Statement or the accompanying notes.  The tax
rate is calculated as income tax expense divided by before-
tax income:

     Tax Rate =  Income Tax Expense * Before-tax Income

                        13.9        T       30.5

              =  46%

-------
                            -21-
     The next chapter of this manual describes procedures
for entering data into the program.

-------
                                      -22-

                                  Exhibit 3-1

                                   WORKSHEET
                     (dollar figures expressed in
Name of Party
Name and Address of Subject Company
  (if different)	
Relationship to Party
Name and Location
of Case
Financial Year
  Ends:         	
Estimated Remedial
  Action Cost
Financial Data for Subject Company:

   Year            Net Income     Depreciation
      Fixed Assets
     (end of year)
  19
Additional Financial Data for Final Year 19_

  Current Liabilities
   (end of year)
  Long-Term Liabilities
   (end of year)
  Net Worth
   (end of year)
  Interest Expense

  Income Tax Rate
Source of Data:

Notes:

-------
                                          -23-



                                    Exhibit 3-2

                              EFFECTS OF MISSING DATA
 If the following
 data are not
 provided:
 Net Income

 Depreciation/Fixed
  Assets

 Current Liabilities

 Long-term Liabilities

 Net Worth

 Interest Expense

 Income Tax Rate
              The program will not calculate:

  Cash Flow to                                  Ability
Total Liabilities  Total Liabilities  Interest    to
 (Beaver's ratio)    to Net Worth     Coverage    Pay
        X

        X
X

X

X
                                         X

                                         **
  If depreciation data are not entered, the program will estimate depreciation
  as 5 percent of fixed assets (if data on fixed assets are provided) or as
  zero (if data on fixed assets are not available).  This estimate will gener-
  ally result in an over-estimate of the firm's ability to pay.  This estimate
 .will not be used to calculate financial ratios.  Fixed assets data are needed
  only if depreciation data are not provided.
**
  If an income tax rate is not provided, the program will assume 40 percent as
  a default value.  The income tax rate is used in the calculation of interest
  coverage.

-------
Exhibit  3-3:   VAiUE LINE  REPORT
        PFIZER INC.NYSE.PFE
                                                            -24-
                                                                                                                           1265
                                                                   16.9K-
               31.0  25,3  35.3  38.3  43.1
                                                         45.0  36.9  31.1  29.6  39.0  41.8   63.8
                                                         ?.k+..L?3-8  26.4  13.8  25.6  29.O  32.0

                                                                 18.0 J
                                                                                                                      1984  1985  1986
                                                                                                                      Nov. 20. 1981  ViluiUm
                                                 Options
                                                 TndtOn
                                                  ASE
                                                                                                              nVwftft Pnct Piifoiiiv
                                                                                                              •nci Ntit 12  Mas.
                                                                             RMnhra Me* Ivtnglli
         nslder Decl* font              1981
               J AS ONDIJ F MAMJ J AS
         to BUY  ooozaojac-ooioooo
          Ssil  i i  i o o  o  o o o o  1  i .i o o
                                                                                                              (Salt: 1 Highttt to S Umitl
                                                                                                                         1984-8S PROJECTIONS
                                                                                                                           Mo    fefe   teal T«W
                                                                                                                                       Man
                                                                                                                           110 (+130%)  25%
                                                                                                                            90  (+90*1  ia%
 Institutional Decisions
         20-80  30-80 40-aO  ia'81 20*81
 to Buy'   .101   IIS   104   116   11O
 to Sell     101   120   110   109   122
 HMg-ilOOO) 39111  41048 42052  42315 41040
                                    Pttc*mi6.0
                                    fhtm i4.0
                                    traded  2.0
          19661.19671  1968   1969)1970  1971
                                                                                                                      Sifeiptrth
                                                                                                                      "CuhFI«H"perik
                                                                                                                    (A)EirnlR|ipZO%
           CK-
          1*78
          1979
          1980
          1981
          1982
          Cat
          tudir
          1978
          1979
          1980
          1981
          1982
          imdtr
          1977
          1978
          1979
          1980
          1981
         QUARTERU MIES (J fflllL)
       Har.31 lmiJBj«pi30 Dtt.31
       546.9  585.3  SB9.7  640.2
       640.8  677.5  683.9  743.8
       710.1  7345  759.4  825.3
       818.2  797.8  819,1  SS4.S
       SIS    895   8H>   BSD
                               236Z
                               2746.(
                               3029.
                               3300
                               3650
          , EARNINGS PER SHURE
       Met. 31 JBM38Stpl30 Otc.31
                              Ml Fu«
               .78
 .71
..80
 .89
 .96
1.00    .80
                     .78
                     .88
               .79    .92
               .85    .19
                     .95
       .78
       .80
       .88
       .80
       .as
        QUHRTERLt DIVIOErtDS >MD
       •tr. 31 June 30 Sept 30 OK. 31
        .24
        ,27
        .33
        .36
        .40
              .24
              .30
              .33
              .36
              .40-
.24
.30
.27
.30
.33   .33
.36   .36
.40
                                Fun
                                Ten
                                Yur
      2.93
      3.26
      3.48
      2.80
      3.80
wl Fun
 •TtIT
   .99
  1.1J
  1.3;
  1.4*
                                      BUSINESS: Pfizer  Inc.  is ,a major  producer  of Phar-
                                      maceuticals; • animal health'  lines; specialty chemicals;
                                      toiletries  and cosmetics. Also makes iron oxides  and
                                      specialty  metals.  Important product  names  include •
                                      Vibrant-felt  (antibiotic);  Mlnipress  (antihypertensive
                                      aa.nl}:  Felftfrts  (antiarthrittc  agent);  Dlabinese
                                                                                     (antidiabetes agent); and Coly (cosmetics). Int'l bus., 60%
                                                                                     of sales {63% of operating profits);' R&D, 5.3%; employee
                                                                                     'costs. 30%. '80 doprec. rate: 5.8%.,Est'd plant aget 9 yre,
                                                                                     Has 41,200 errtpls.. 59.0OO stkhldrs. Diri own 1% of stk.
                                                                                     Chrhnn.: E.T. Pratt, Jr. Pros.:  G.D. Laubach. Inc.: Del. Ad-
                                                                                     dress: 235 E. 42rtd St., New York, N.Y. .10017.
Pfizer will be glad to get  1981, out  of the
way.  We estimate shard' earnings at $2.80,
20% below 1980*8 high-water mark.  A  $45
million-(590 a share) writeoff on the disposal
of the unprofitable CT Scanner business is'
one reason for the shortfall. Another is the ex- ••
ceptional strength of the dollar.  With over
60% of its business denortiinated in overseas
currencies, Pfizer suffered exchange losses of
90C a  share in the first nine months.
Prospects for 1982 appeal brighter, assum-
ing currency 'fluctuations ease. The absence
of the profit-draining CT scanner operation'
will'boost operating results. Too, consumer
products  and  the metafe-related materials
science  business  should  continue posting
good  results despite sluggish economic con-
ditions. (Sales in  both divisions were up 20%
in the third  quarter.) So should the all-im-
portant' pharmaceutical  business, which is
benefiting from  successful  new' products.
Feldene,  the most promising new entry, has
met with enthusiastic physician response in
the 20 overseas countries where it's already
available. We estimate sales of Feldene  will
more than double to $300 million, with a bot-
tom line contribution of 50C-60C  a  share in
1982. The expected launching of the product
                                                       in the lucrative U.S. market early next year
                                                       will boost sales further. ,
                                                       Pfizer'. is .on  the prowl  for 'acquisitions.
                                                       Although its large cash positon— $495 million
                                                       at midyear— is earning high interest, Pfizer
                                                       would father put the money to work  in an
                                                       ongoing business. That way its returns won't
                                                       suffer  as  interest   rates   fall. , The  recent
                                                       purchase of Shiley Inc., a $60 million maker
                                                       of artificial heart valves, could be dwarfed in
                                                       importance by a  really big acquisition.
                                                       .This conservative  issue  is best suited for
                                                       its 3- to 5-year recovery potential. The pay-
                                                       off from  new drugs  and acquisitions will en-
                                                       sure that earnings advance at 10%-15% an-
                                                       nually to 1984-86, giving  rise to worthwhile
                                                       stock price appreciation over that time span.
                                                       Since we don't expect profit comparisons to
                                                       improve  until next  year,  there's no partic-
                                                       ular rush to buy these shares. They will prob-
                                                       ably trail the market averages over .the next
                                                       twelve months. '                 R.C.C./L.K,
                                                                                                    H«»mtd SUM dad Pratu thcmm in Bmxm Un»
.
HMMi Cm
Agridlwd
                                                                                                         '1978
                                                                                                                          . Mtt
                                                                                                                                    1MI
                                                                                                                                    IKOfl3.IV
                                                                                                  i?7i
                                                                                                 14W.<| 22.6%)
                                                                                        177 j | f.7%] 093 1 9?XI  *S18 |mi
                                                                                        W7.8 I UK) 3144 1 6.3X1  416J (U%)
                                                                             Omaiw      533.9 15.6\l t43.sls.Hl}  3S].0|f.l%)
                                                                             Md«>b Sana  JIM («.4<| ' 841.7 JSJ%1  253.7 I MM
                                                                             Comcaiy Intel   ?399.3I I6.IXI }74t»l 15.8X1 M».3( lt,3%| nOtttl.}%)
 (A> Based  on. avg.  shs. putst'g. Nextlto UFO. <"*4 <"
                                                                                                            Compemi-s Finenciel Strength    A+*
                                                                                                            Sloek's Price Stability             as
                                                                                                            Price Growth Persistence          25
                                                                                                            Earnings Predictability     	100

-------
                                           -25-
                                  Exhibit 3^4

                                   WORKSHEET
                      (dollar figures expressed in millions}
Name of Party   PFIZER, INC.
Name  and  Address of  Subject  Company
   (if different)   SAME	
Name and Location
of Case
Financial Year
  Ends;         	
Estimated Remedial
  Action Cost
                     December 31
                        N/A
                                              Relationship to Party
Financial Data for Subject Company:

   Year            Net Incomeu'
  197S
  19
                      159.9
                       17.5.4
                      206,3
                       237.9
                       254.8
                                  DepreciatiorQy    Fixed Assets *
                                                   (end of year)
                                     59,0
                                     67.6
73,6
                                     80,0
                                     86.6
                   N/A
                   N/A
N/A
                   N/A
                   N/A
Additional Financial Data for Final Year 19#£:

   Current Liabilities  fend of year)       1080.2

   Long-Term Liabilities (end of year)

   Net Worth (end of year)

   Interest Expense * *

   Income Tax Rate
                                            1572.9
                                             119.3
                                              36.4%
                 (3)

                 ©

                 Oft
Source of Data:  Value Line Report> 11/20/81

Notes:**Estimated from "Total Interest Coverage" (4.8x) and operating income
         (operating margin 18.9% x sales $3029.. 3):
                  (30.2-9.3 x ,189}  v 4,8 =-129.3
*Not needed if depreciation data are available

-------
                                              -26-





                                       Exhiblt 3-5


                             EXCEPT FROM DUN & BRADSTREET REPORT
INAHCE
* A  FINANCIAL  SPREAD SHEET OF COMPARATIVES,  RATIOS,  AND INDUSTRY  AVERAGES
* MAY  BE AVAILABLE.  ORDER A DUNS  FINANCIAL  PROFILE  VIA YOUR DUNS  PRIHT
* TERMINAL OR  LOCAL D£B  OFFICE
Curz  Assets
Curr  Liabs
Current Ratio
Net Working Capital
Other Assets
Long  Term Debt
Worth
Sales
Net Income
      Consol/Fiscal
Cash               $
Accts Rec
Inventory
Overpayment of
Taxes
Ppd Expenses
Prepaid Taxes
           Curz  Assets
         Fixed Assets
         Unamoztized
         Mortgage
         Other Assets
                              Consol/Fiscal
                                Dec  31 1978
                                   1,856,951
                                     347,031
                                        5.35
                                   1 ,509,920
                                   2 , 4 1 3 . 82j9.
                                   2, mi , 698
                                   1 ,782, 051
                                   6,756, 171
                                     .1*12, 1 50.
                              statement dated
                                   1,220, 186
                                     820,266
                                     910,430

                                      27,659
                                      57,329
                                       2,723
               Consol/Fiscal
                  Dec 31  1979
                    2,953,330
                    2, 131,794
                           3.4
                    2,090,396
                    j> r fi-7 i) , n 1 A.
                    2,131,794
                    2,632,620
                   11,991,149
                      .850.569.
             DEC  31   1980 :
             Accts  Pay         $
             Accruals
             L/T  Debt Due
             Current
                                                                 Consol/Fiscal
                                                                   Dec  31  1980
                                                                      3,038,593 ,
                                                                        49Q.H3S.<
                                                                            b . 1
                                                                      2,548,158
                                                                      ft . A i p . n •> 3.
                                                                      ?.. o A 2 . f> ?. s

                                                                     tn, too ,"b"u2
                                                                       178,269
                                                                       245, 186

                                                                        66,980
3,038,593
2,779,297

   27,832
    3,944
                                             Curt Liabs
                                           L.T. liab-Other
                                           CAPITAL  STOCK
                                           Capital  in Excess
                                           of Pax
                                           RETAINED EARNINGS
                                                                   490,435
                                                                 2.082.625
                                                                    40,000
                                                                        300
                                                                 3,236,305
         Total Assets           5,849,666      Total                  5,849,666
          From  JAN  01  1980   to  DEC 31 1980 sales $10,100,582; net income $643,980.   Fire
     insurance on mdsa I fixt  I bldg $4,000,000.
          Submitted SEP 04 1981 by            office mgr.  Prepared  from  statement(s)   by
     Accountant'                           CPA's.   Prepared  from  books  without audit.
                                          — 0 —
          Fixed assets shown net loss $2,325,261 depreciation.   Fixed assets shown  consists
     of  property,  plant  and equipment,  apartment  buildings,  autos,   trucks furniture,
     fixtures and rental property.  Accruals in current liabilities are wages  and  bonuses
     and  pension  expense.   Other  assets - miscellaneous assets.  Current debt clue within
     one year and the long term liabilities consists of a 95J  first  inortgae  noto  payable
     $12,810  monthly,  balance $1,300,927.  Secured by real estate, Normandy Park Apartment
     Complex.                                                          ~       ,
          Second note owed $783,006; payable $6,850 monthly.  Secured by  real  estate,  the

          Third note $7,316; payable $250 monthly, secure by land.
          Fourth note  $17,815;  payable,  at  $487  monthly,  secured  by office equipment-
          Fifth note   $18,975;   payable  $146   monthly,   secured  by
                                                 monthly,  secured  by
                                       real   estate.
                                    real   estate  and
                                                  represents  the  subject  and  its  one
                            payable
     Sixth  note  $18,975;  payable  at  $184
obligations under capital leases $13,635.
     Note this consolidated  fiscal  statement
subsidiary.
     On  Sep  4  1981, officers Mere unavailable for an interview.  The subject  is well
establsihed and has operated successfully for     years.   Trade  payment  history   is
good.   The current ratio is 6.1,  which  is high for the industry.  Operating capital  is
good. Subject shows a continued growth  in the stockholder's equity  over  the  last   3
years.   Sales  show a  sales decrease for 1980.  Financial condition  is strong.  Trend
of business steady.

-------
                                              -27-
                                     Exhlbit 3-6
                                      WORKSHEET
                         (dollar figures expressed in dollars)
   Name  of Party     "XXX INC."
   Name  and  Address  of  Subject  Company
      (if different)    SAME	
                           Relationship to Party
   Name and Location
   of Case
   Financial Year
     Ends:         	
   Estimated Remedial
     Action Cost
    December 31
    N/A
   Financial Data for Subject Company:
      Year            Net Incomen)  Depreciation
     1978
     19££
     19££
     19_
     19
422,150.00
850*569.00
643,986.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
 Fixed Assets
(end of year)
 2,413,829,00
 2,674,018.00
 2,810,073.00
    Additional Financial Data for Final Year 19_£3
       Current Liabilities Cend of year)      490,435.00
      Long-Term Liabilities (end of year)   2,082,625.00
      Net Worth (end  of year)
      Interest  Expense
      Income Tax Rate
   Source of Data:    D&B Keport, 9/4/81
   Notes:
                      3,276,606.00
                          N/A
                          N/A  %
K  *Not needed if depreciation data are  available.

-------
                                   -28-





                          Exhibit 3-7A




                 ANNUAL REPORT INCOME  STATEMENT
Years ended March 31,
1981
1980
1979
In thousands except per shore data
Revenues
Costs and expenses;
Operating
Setting, general and administrative
3 Depreo'at/on and amortization (Notes i(b)
and t(c))

Income from operations
Other income (charges):
I Interest expense, net (Note 1 (d))
{Write-off of claims receivable (Note 1 1)
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated
affiliates (Note II)
} Income before income taxes
) Provision for income taxes (Notes l(e) and 7)
y Net income
Average common shares outstanding
Per share of common stock (Note l(f))

$269,120

166,160
38,864

28,401
233,425
35,695

(5,1931

—
30,502
/J,945
$ 16,557
tt.007
$ 1.27

$230,217

147,969
31,27*

24,157
203,402
26,815

(5,014)
—
_
21JBQI
10,050
$ 11,751
11,619
$ 1.01

$207,764

137,292
29,591

21.639
188,522
19,242

(6,645)
(2,000)
2,925
13.522
5,893
$ 7,629
1 1.505
$ .66
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

-------
                                                          -29-
                                        O (N o
                                                                                       8
                                                 *O  •*• rv  l*>
                                                 S>  00 "I  O
                                                 fs»  QJ "ij*  ^^
                                                     x>
I--,
 I
•H
•a
                                        >o
rsi

-O
                                                                  I — 00
                                                                o-
                                                                  . LO LO
                                                                         O rn
                                                                                                     S
                                                                                                    l/\

                                                                                                    I
                                                                                                     g
                                                                                                    5
                                                                                                    I
                                                                                                    s
                                                                                                    3
                                                                                                   . oo
oo

o
V
rsi
                                                          82
                                                          ••*-
                                                          hC
                                                          a

-------
                                 -30-







                          Exhibit  3-7C




  ANNUAL REPORT STATEMENT OF  CHANGES  IN FINANCIAL POSITION
Years ended March 31,
1981
1980
1979
In thousonds
Working capital provided by:
Net income
Charges (credits) not affecting working capital:
Depreciation and amortization (£)
Deferred income taxes
Write-off of claims receivable
Amortization of deferred investment tax credits
Minority interest
Other
Working capital provided by operations
Disposal of property and equipment
Proceeds from sale of common stock
Increase in long-term debt*
Proceeds from debt placement
Other
Increase in equity applicable to business
acquisitions
Sale of investments in unconso/idated affiliates
Other, net
Total working capital provided
Working capital used for:
Purchases of property and equipment
Reduction in long-term debt
Term credit agreement
Other
Reciassification of deferred taxes for IK
settlement
Increase in intangible assets relating to acquired
businesses, net
Cash dividend
Total working capital used
Net increase (decrease) in working capital
Working capital at beginning of year
Working capital at end of year
Increase (decrease) in components of working
capital:
Cash, equivalents and short-term Investments
Accounts and notes receivable, trade
Notes and claims receivable
Prepaid expenses and other i
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Income taxes
Current portion of long-term debt
Net increase (decrease) in working capital


$16,557

28,401
6,379
—
(1,897)
663
(75)
50,028
1,712
24,620

—
12,520

1,506
_
2,234
92,620

71,117

—
15,253

5,946

6.001
702
99,019
(6.399;
M,249
H£50


$ (88)
6,969
607
1,432
(5,276)
(8,425)
ff.6/8J
$(6,399)


$11,751

24,157
6,939
—
(1,607)
782
163
42,185
4,480
-

-
1,326

_
—
626
48.617

48,446

—
4,900

—

247
—
53,593
(4.976)
19,225
$14,249


$ 349
2,4/3
(3,585)
(312)
(3,132)
877
(1,586)
$(4.976)


$ 7,629

21,639
3,359
2.000
(1.326)
100
115
33.5/6
3,392
_

57,000
10,430

_
1,375
1,880
107.593

35,102

51.000
8,042

—

195
—
94.339
13,254
5,971
$ 19,225


$ 5.278
3,614
3.468
913
(4,530)
(1,775)
6,286
$ 13,254
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

-------
                                         -31-

                               Exhibit  3-7D

             NOTES  TO  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  (EXCERPTS)
6. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets, relating to acquired bus/nesses, consist of the following:	
AsofMarch3l,       ,	I98_[	1980
Cost of purchased businesses in excess of fair value of net assets
  acquired, net of accumulated amortization of $4,253,000
  ($3,641.000 in 1980)
Covenants not to compete and customer lists, net of accumulated
  amortization of $2.626,000 ($2,016,000 in 1980)
$22,155


  1.644
$16,945


 .2.075
                                                                 $23,799    $19,020
The cost of purchased businesses in excess of fair value of net assets acquired is amortized
principally over forty years on a straight-line basis. Covenants not to compete and customer
lists are being amortized over the lives of the agreements or their estimated economic lives
which at March 31,1981 have a weighted overage remaining life of approximately four years.
Amortization of intangible assets amounted to $1,222,000, $1.020,000 and $944,000 in
1981, 1980 and 1979, respectively.
C. Property and Equipment
Major renewals and betterments are capitalized. Ordinary maintenance and repair
costs are charged to expense as incurred. Repairs and maintenance costs amounted to
$18,046,000, $16,852,000 and $16,318,000 in 1981. 1980 and 1979, respectively. When
items of property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, related cost and accu-
mulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or toss is
included in  income.
        Landfill sites are recorded at cost and are depredated, principally on the basis of
capacity used, to estimated residual value. Landfill preparation costs and improvements are
capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives or the life of the land/if!, which-
ever is shorter.
        Depreciation and amortization of other property and equipment are provided using
the straight-line method over estimated useful lives as follows: buildings, 10 to 40 years;
equipment, 3 to 10 years; and leasehold improvements over the period of the applicable
leases. The  weighted overage remaining life of each category as of March 31,1981 is 14
years, 4.5 years and 9,5 years,  respectively.
        Depredation and amortization of property and equipment amounted  to           t
$27,179,000, $23,137,000 and $20,695,000 in 1981, 1980 and 1979. respectively.          {
D. Interest Expense
Commencing in 1981, interest has been capitalized in accordance with Statement of Finan-
cial Accounting Standards No. 34. Net interest expense consists of the following
components:
Years ended March 31,
Interest expense
Interest income
Capitalized interest
1981
$7,630
(2,114)
(323)
$5,193
1980
$7,268
(2,254)
$5,014
1979
$7,290
(645)
$6.645
Income before income taxes in fiscal 1979 included the effects of two items of a non-
recurring nature.
       During fiscal 1976 and 1977, SCA commenced two lawsuits against its former Presi-
dent and others to recover excessive amounts estimated at $2,560,000 which it alleged he
caused SCA to pay for the purchase of certain assets in three transactions which occurred
while he was President. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 1979, SCA determined that it was
improbable that it would collect the full amount of these claims and charged $2,000,000 of
the claims receivable against income and reclassified the remaining $560,000 to current
assets. In the second quarter of fiscal, I960, the Company accepted payment of $525,000
from its insurance carrier and charged the remaining $35,000 against income.
       Further, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 1979, the Company sold its investment in
a group of related unconsolidated affiliates for an aggregate of $4.300.000. which resulted
in a pre-tax gain of $2,925,000.

-------
                                           -32-
                                  Exhiblt  3-8

                                   WORKSHEET
                      (dollar  figures  expressed  in  thousands)
Name  of Party    "x?z INC. "
Name  and  Address  of  Subject  Company
   (if different)  SCAServiaes,  Ina.
Name and Location
of Case
Financial Year
  Ends:             Maroh SI
Estimated Remedial
  Action Cost   	N/A
                                              Relationship to Party   Parent
                                                                   (wholly-owned
                                                                    subsidiary)
Financial Data for  Subject Company:
   Year


  19 JL*

  19 J?
  19j?
  19	
  19
                   Net Income
                      6,802
                           * *
                     11,751

                     16,55?
Depreciation
  21,639

  24,157

  28,401
 Fixed Assets *
(end of year)

    N/A

    It/A

    N/A
 Exhibit 3-7A &
 Exhibit 3-7D ©

^Exhibit 3-7A,  3-7B
 or Exhibit 3-7D(z)
Additional Financial Data for Final Year

   Current Liabilities (end of year)

   Long-Term Liabilities (end of year)

   Net Worth (end of year)

   Interest Expense

   Income Tax Rate
           48,765

           84,824

          130,276

            7,630.
                                                          Exhibit 3-7B(3)

                                                          Exhibit 3-7BQ)

                                                          Exhibit 3-7B(j)

                                                          Exhibit 3-7A and Exhibit 3-70©

                                                          Exhibit' 3-7A
Source of Data:  5^ serviees Inc., 1981 Annual Report
Notes: **Adjusted for the extraordinary gain & loss in 1979.
*Not needed if depreciation  data  are  available.

-------
ENTERING THE DATA
CHAPTER 4
INTRODUCTION

     The outline and- exhibits below illustrate the basic for-
mat and procedure for entering data into the financial assess-
ment program.  The underlined items are those entered by the
program user.  The program asks for information in the order
indicated by the exhibits, and in most cases, after printing
the request prompts the user's response by typing a question
mark.  After typing the response the user should press the
RETURN key; data are not entered and the program will not pro-
ceed until RETURN is pressed.  If the user wishes to halt
program operation he should press the BREAK key.l  This com-
mand will terminate the-run.  To restart the program after
termination, simply type SPFUND.  Note that this returns the
program to its starting point; all data from previous run are
lost when the run is terminated, and must be re-entered.

     It is important to remember that all data required to run
the financial assessment program must be entered in a form
which the program can read and correctly interpret.  For ex-
ample, the program is designed to read only numerical entries
 For some terminals the BREAK key will not terminate the pro-
 gram.  In this case the analyst should ask User Services for
 the "appropriate means of terminating the program.

-------
                             -34-
for financial data.  Thus, if a firm has a tax rate of forty-
six percent, the appropriate entry is 46.^  The program will
respond to entries such as 46% or FORTY-SIX with an error
message.  The user should therefore be careful to adhere to
the program format whenever entering data.
INITIAL DATA

   .  At the outset the program requests information which
identifies the case under analysis.  Each question the com-
puter asks must be answered, because pressing RETURN without
making an entry will result in an error.  If the user does
not know the answer to a question in this section, he should
continue the program by typing UNKNOWN.  The only exception
to this rule is in entering the number of the EPA region in
which a case is located.  If that number is unknown, the
user should enter 0^ (zero) .   An example of the initial data
entry is provided in Exhibit 4-1.

     •    Today's Date.  This date should be entered
          in numerical form, XX/XX/XX, as illustrated
          in the exhibit.  The program will read only
          the first eight characters  (including num-
          bers, slashes and spaces), ignoring any
          characters beyond that length.

     •    Case Name.  The program will read only the
          first twenty characters  (letters and spaces)
          of the case name,  ignoring any characters
          beyond that length.

     •    Location.  Identification of case location
          by city and state is recommended, but the
          program will accept other locational data.
          The entry is again limited to twenty char-
          acters .
•"•The program will also accept a tax rate entered in the form
 .46, and will interpret the entry correctly as 46 percent.

-------
                             -35-
          Region Number.  The number of the EPA region
          in which the case is located should be en-
          tered in numerical form.  If unknown, enter
          £ (zero).

          Filing Date.  The format for the date a case
          was filed with EPA is a numerical entry,
          XX/XX/XX,  identical to that for entry of to-
          day's date.

          Par±y jSFame.  The entry for the name of the
          party whose financial capabilities are to be
          analyzed is limited to twenty characters.
RULES FOR ENTERING FINANCIAL DATA

     The last entry requested in the program's initial sec-
tion is an estimate of the cost of remedial action.  The
format for this entry illustrates some general rules to fol-
low whenever entering financial data into the program.

     •    Dollar or Percentage Signs.  The program will
          not accept entries containing dollars, per-
          centage signs or other non-numeric characters.
          The user should omit all such characters from
          input data.

     •    Commas.  The program will misread any numbers
          containing commas, ignoring all numbers to the
          right of the first comma.  For example, the
          program will interpret the entry .9,985,168.98
          as 2/ and will employ the latter value in all
          calculations.  The user should therefore omit
          all commas from input data.

     •    Decimal Points.  Decimal points must be entered
          for all financial data.  Printed output is
          rounded to two or three decimal points, but re-
          maining digits of the entry are retained in-
          ternally and employed in all calculations.  The
          decimal point should be omitted when entering
          the "number of years of data" and the "first
          year of data" as discussed below.

-------
                            -36-
     •    Unknown Values.  If data on any financial
          variables are unavailable, the user should
          enter 999.9.   The program recognizes tiiis
          entry as indication that the value for a
          variable is unknown, and will modify its
          calculations accordingly.
                 \
     •    Default Values.  In some instances lack of
          adequate data will prevent calculation of
          the desired financial ratios.  In other cases
          the program makes reasonable assumptions
          about unknown values and employs these default
          values in estimating a firm's financial cap-
          abilities.  The default values assigned to
          various variables are indicated in Exhibit
          3-2.  Note that default values will only be
          activated if the user enters 999.9.  Simply
          pressing RETURN without making an entry will
          result in an error.

     •    Reaj^ Values ^etween^ 999 V0^ and _99_9' ..99J?.  If
          any real financial data have values between
          999.0 and 999.999, the program will misinter-
          pret the data and treat the value as unknown.
          To avoid this problem the user should round
          the data to 1000.0.

     *    Consistent - Units.  The user should place ex-
          treme importance on ensuring that all finan-
          cial data are entered in consistent units.
          For example,  if data taken from Dun & Brad-
          street, Value Line, or annual reports are
          expressed in millions of dollars, the esti-
          mated cost of remedial action should be
          similarly expressed.  To avoid conversion
    ^ .    errors the user is advised to express all
          financial data, whenever possible, in the
          units employed by the primary data source.

     •    Nominal Dollars.  It is not necessary to con-
          vert dollar figures from previous years to
          current dollar terms.  The nominal dollar
          figures, as they are expressed in the origin-
          al source document, should be entered.

The entry for the estimated costs of remedial action and for
all financial data should follow the rules above.

-------
                             -37-
THE FINANCIAL DATA

     After receiving an estimate of the cost of remedial
action the program requests input of specific data on a firm's
financial situation.  The protocol for entering these data
is outlined below and an example is provided in Exhibit 4-2.

     •    Years of Data to be Analyzed.  The total
          number of years of data the user plans to
          employ in the analysis should be entered
          in numerical form without a decimal point.
          (.see exhibit) .   The program will respond
          to spelled-out entries such as THREE with
          an error message.

          Between three and five years of data are
          necessary; the program will terminate if
          a number less than three is entered, and
          lacks the capacity to analyze more than
          five years of data.  To ensure accuracy
         • in assessing financial capability, the
          user is advised to submit five years of
          the most recent data available.  Note too
          that the program assumes that data will
          be provided for consecutive years.

     •    First Year.  The first (earliest)  year of
          data to be analyzed should be entered in
          numerical form without a decimal point.
          For example, if data from 1976 to 1980 are
          being used, enter 1976.  The program will
          reject entries in other forms.

     •    Financial Data.  The program then asks for
          year-by-year data on the firm's net income,
          depreciation,  and fixed assets.  In addition,
          it requests the most recent year's data on
          the firm's current liabilities, long-term
          liabilities, net worth, interest expense,
          and income tax rate.  Entries for these var-
          iables should follow the rules for entering
          financial data previously discussed.  Briefly,
          the guidelines are:

          a)  Omit dollar signs, percentage signs, or
              other non-numeric characters.

-------
                            -38-
          b)  Omit commas.

          c)  Include decimal points.

          d)  Enter 999.9 for unknown values.

          e)  Revise data if any actual values
              are between 999.0 and 999.999.

          f)  Use consistent units.

          f)  Do not convert figures to constant
              dollars.
CORRECTING INPUT ERRORS

     In some cases, as indicated above, format errors result
in an error message being printed.  The program will not
recognize incorrect numbers for financial data, however.  In-
correct entries of this type may be corrected through the
procedure described below.

     Once the user has entered all necessary financial data,
the program summarizes the data in tabular form (see Exhibit
4-3) .  The user should check this table against his work-
sheet.  If there are no errors, the user should type N or
NO when asked if there are any errors in the data.  If there
are errors, the user should type Y or YES.  Entering YES
moves the program into an error correction mode.  In this
mode the program first prints a numbered list of all finan-
cial variables.  (See Exhibit 4-4.)  It then asks the user
to enter (in order) the number of the incorrect variable, a
comma,' and the year for which the value is incorrect.  Cor-
rections should be entered one variable and one year at a
time.  The program continues to correct values and to ask
whether other variables need to be corrected until the user
responds to that question by entering N or NO.

     Once the user has indicated that all errors have been
corrected, the program again summarizes the data in tabular
form and asks the user if there are any errors in the data.
If the user responds Y or YES, the program will return to
the error correction routine.  If the user responds N or NO,
the program will proceed.  (See Exhibit 4-5.)

-------
                            -39-
     A list of variables with unknown values is then pro-
vided.  The program will indicate whether the missing data
will preclude the calculation of any financial ratios or
the firm's ability to pay.  It asks whether the user would
like to continue.  If the data gaps are such that the user
believes the program cannot provide a realistic assessment
of a firm's financial capabilities he should enter NO or N,
thus terminating the program.  If he has entered adequate
data, however, he should type Y or YES.  This entry shifts
the program to its output mode.  The results provided by
the system are discussed in the next chapter.

-------
                              -40-

                         Exhibit 4-1

                       INITIAL DATA ENTRY
          SUPERFUND FINANCIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
     THIS PROGRAM IS DESIGNED TO ASSIST SUPERFUND  PERSONNEL
IN DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF REMEDIAL ACTION COSTS A
FIRM CAN AFFORD TO PAY. THE PROGRAM  IS INTERACTIVE AND
WILL ASK YOU TO PROVIDE CERTAIN DATA.  THE  PROGRAM WILL
ANALYZE THESE DATA AND ESTIMATE THE  AMOUNT  A FIRM  CAN
AFFORD TO PAY.  IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONSr  PLEASE  CONSULT
THE INSTRUCTION MANUAL.
 ENTER TODAYS DATE(XX/XX/XX)
4/25/82
 ENTER CASE NAME(UP TO 20 LETTERS)
TEST CASE #2
 ENTER LOCATION QF CASE 
-------
                               -41-

                          Exhibit 4-2

                       FINANCIAL DATA ENTRY
     THE PROGRAM WILL NOW ASK YOU FOR SPECIFIC DATA.  THESE DATA
ARE NORMALLY AVAILABLE IN A COMPANYS ANNUAL REPORT, A VALUE LINE
REPORT OR A DUN & BRADSTREET REPORT ON THE COMPANY.  EXAMPLES OF THE
REQUIRED DATA ARE PROVIDED IN THE INSTRUCTION MANUAL. PLEASE OMIT
ANY COMMAS AND ALWAYS INCLUDE THE DECIMAL POINT.   IF THE DATA ARE NOT
AVAILABLE, PLEASE TYPE IN 999.9
 HOW MANY YEARS OF DATA WILL BE USED IN THE ANALYSIS?
(FIVE IS RECOMMENDED.  AT A MINIMUM, THREE IS REQUIRED.
5
 WHAT IS THE FIRST YEAR OF DATA TO BE ENTERED?
197S
 ENTER NET INCOME FOR 1976
159.9
 ENTER DEPRECIATION FOR 1976
       FIXED ASSETS IN 1976
       NET INCOME FOR 1977
 ENTER DEPRECIATION FOR 1977
67. S
 ENTER
?
999.9
 ENTER

206.3
       FIXED ASSETS IN 1977
       NET INCOME FOR 1979
       DEPRECIATION FOR 1978

-------
                         -42-

                  Exhibit 4-2 (cont'd)

                  FINANCIAL DATA ENTRY
 ENTER
7
999.9
 ENTER
7
237.9
 ENTER
7
as. 6
 ENTER
?
999.9
 ENTER
?
254.8
 ENTER
7
86.8
 ENTER
7
999.9
FIXED ASSETS IN 1978
NET INCOME FOR 1979
DEPRECIATION FOR 1979
FIXED ASSETS IN 1979
NET INCOME FOR 1990
DEPRECIATION FOR 1980
FIXED ASSETS IN 1980
 ENTER CURRENT LIABILITIES  IN  1980

1080.2

 ENTER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES IN  1980

583.1

 ENTER NET WORTH IN  1980
7
1572.9
 ENTER
?
119.3

 ENTER
7
3.64
INTEREST EXPENSE IN 1980
INCOME TAX RATE IN 1980

-------
                            -43-


                       Exhibit 4-3

                      SUMMARY OF DATA
     YOU HAVE PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING DATA.
THE DATA FOR COMPLETENESS AND ACCURACY.
                                 PLEASE CHECK
YEAR

1876
1377
1978
137S
1980
NET INCOME

  159.80
  175.40
  20S.30
  237.80
  254.80
DEPRECIATION

     53.00
     67.60
     73.60
     86.60
     86.60
FIXED ASSETS

    993.30
    999.30
    999.30
    333.30
    339.90
FINANCIAL VALUES FOR THE YEAR 1980:
  CURRENT LIABILITIES
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
            NET WORTH
     INTEREST EXPENSE
      INCOME TAX RATE
                       1080.20
                        583.10
                       1572.90
                        119.30
                          3.64

-------
                          _44-

                     Exhibit  4-4

                  CORRECTING  ERRORS
 ARE THERE ANY ERRORS  IN  THE  ABOVE  DATA(YES/NO)?
YES.

INDICATE WHICH DATA CONTAIN ERRORS  BY  TYPING  IN  THE  NUMBER
OF  THAT VARIABLE, AS FOLLOWS!
    1. NET INCOME
    2. DEPRECIATION
    3. FIXED ASSETS
    4. CURRENT LIABILITIES
    5. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
    S, NET WORTH
    7. INTEREST EXPENSE
    8. INCOME TAXES
ENTER NUMBER OF INCORRECT VARIABLE AND YEAR OF  INCORRECT  DATA
(SEPARATED BY COMMAS)
7
2,1979
 ENTER DEPRECIATION FOR 1979
7
80.0

ARE THERE ANY OTHER VARIABLES TO BE CORRECTED?
YES

ENTER NUMBER OF INCORRECT VARIABLE AND YEAR OF  INCORRECT  DATA
{SEPARATED BY COMMAS)
7
B,198Q

 ENTER INCOME TAX RATE IN i960
7
36.4

ARE THERE ANY OTHER VARIABLES TO BE CORRECTED?
NO

-------
                            -45-


                       Exhibit 4-5

                     SUMMARY OF DATA
     YOU HAVE PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING DATA.
THE DATA FOR COMPLETENESS AND ACCURACY.
                                 PLEASE CHECK
YEAR

1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
NET INCOME

  159.90
  175.40
  20B.30
  237.90
  254.80
DEPRECIATION

     59.00
     67.60
     73.60
     80.00
     86.60
FIXED ASSETS

    999.90
    999.90
    999.90
    999.90
    999.90
FINANCIAL VALUES FOR THE YEAR 1980!
  CURRENT LIABILITIES
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
            NET WORTH
     INTEREST EXPENSE
      INCOME TAX RATE
                       1080.20
                        583.10
                       1572.90
                        119.30
                         36.40
 ARE THERE ANY ERRORS IN THE ABOVE DATA(YES/NO)?
NO
YOU HAVE PROVIDED THE REQUESTED INFORMATION WITH THE EXCEPTION
OF:
    FIXED ASSETS FOR THE YEAR 1976
    FIXED ASSETS FOR THE YEAR 1977
    FIXED ASSETS FOR THE YEAR 1978
    FIXED ASSETS FOR THE YEAR 1979
    FIXED ASSETS FOR THE YEAR 1980
THE MISSING FIXED ASSET DATA WILL NOT PRECLUDE THE
CALCULATION OF ANY OF THE FINANCIAL RATIOS.
DO YOU WISH TO CONTINUE?
YES

-------
OUTPUT OF FINANCIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
CHAPTER  5
INTRODUCTION

     As noted previously, the financial assessment system is
a two-part system designed to:

     1)  Calculate the amount of remedial action costs a
         firm can afford to pay, and

     2)  Provide a concise financial evaluation of the firm.

The system's output reflects this structure.  First, the
system presents the results of its "ability to pay" calcu-
lations.  Next, it calculates three standard financial ratios
to assess the firm's ability to borrow additional funds.
Finally, on request, the program will display the intermediate
calculations employed in determining the affordable remedial
action costs.  A detailed description of each output is pre-
sented below.1
 The accompanying Technical Support Document contains a
 detailed review of the concept of ability to pay.  It also
 explains the basis for selection of the three financial
 ratios, discusses the interpretation of program results,
 and describes the steps employed in all calculations.

-------
                             -47-
CALCULATION OF ABILITY TO PAY

     The first output of the financial assessment system is
a table which indicates the probability that a firm will be
able to pay a given amount of remedial action costs.  The
system defines cash available to fund remedial action as the
cash flow generated by the firm's operations less the cash
which must be reinvested in the business to maintain its
plant and equipment.  The amount is likely to vary from year
to year.  Consequently, variability in annual cash flows
must be taken into account in estimating the firm's ability
to pay.  The system does so by determining the probability
that given amounts of cash will be available given the var-
iability of the cash .flow which existed in the past.

     An example of the results is provided in Exhibit 5-1.
This example indicates that there is a 50 percent probabil-
ity that the firm will be able to pay annual remedial action
cost of $171 million or a one-time charge of $615 million.
There is an 80 percent chance that the firm can afford a
smaller annual payment of $41 million or a one-time charge
of $148 million.

     The figures provided in Exhibit 5-1 are the before-tax
amounts the firm is likely to be able to afford.  The program
assumes that the costs of remedial action are tax-deductible.
In the event that the costs of remedial action are not tax-
deductible/ this assumption will lead the program to over-
estimate the firm's ability to pay.  In such cases the user
can translate the figures to after-tax affordable costs by
multiplying the before-tax amounts by one minus the marginal
tax rate.1

     An additional feature of the output shown in Exhibit
5-1 is the calculation of"the probability that the firm will
be able to pay the estimated cost of remedial action.  If
the user has not provided an estimated cost during data input
the program will omit this calculation.  If an estimate has
been entered, however, the output will take two basic forms:
.1
 A marginal tax rate of 40 percent should be used since this
 rate is used in the program to convert after-tax cash flows
 to before-tax dollars.

-------
                            -48-
     •    A statement that the firm is unlikely to
          be able to afford the remedial action cost,
          or

     •    An estimate of the probability that the
          firm will be able to pay the cost of re-
          medial action.

An example is presented in Exhibit 5-1.  Note that $615.4
million is the smallest one-time charge greater than the
estimated cost of remedial action of $500 million and that
there is a 50 percent probability that the firm can afford
this charge.

     The one-time charge a firm can afford to pay assumes
that the firm will be able to borrow against its future ex-
pected earnings.  The ability of a firm to raise additional
debt, however, depends on its financial health.  Failure of
two or three of the financial ratios discussed below indi-
cates potential difficulty in obtaining additional debt.
FINANCIAL RATIOS

     After estimating the affordable remedial action costs,
the financial assessment system calculates three ratios:

     •    The ratio -of cash flow to total liabilities,

     •    The ratio of total liabilities to equity,
          and

     •    The ratio of earnings before interest and
          taxes to interest payments (the interest
          coverage ratio).

The system prints the value of these three ratios in decimal
form and states whether or not the values fall above or below
established critical levels.  A message indicates whether the
outcome suggests potential financial difficulties for the
firm.  An example of program output is presented in Exhibit
5-2.

     The three ratios indicate whether a firm may have dif-
ficulty financing remedial'action costs requiring large in-
itial expenditures.  The intent of this assessment is not
necessarily to exempt firms from paying remedial action

-------
                             -49-
costs, but instead to indicate when an extended payment
schedule may be necessary.  A brief explanation of each
of the ratios is provided below.

     The ratio of cash flow to total liabilities is calcu-
lated by dividing internally-generated cash flow (net in-
come plus depreciation) by total debt (current liabilities
plus long-term debt).  This test measures a firm's solvency
and is the single best predictor of bankruptcy up to* five
years prior to failure.  A ratio less than the critical
level of 0.10 indicates that the firm may be unable to meet
its fixed obligations  (interest repayments, debt repayments,
etc.), and is in danger of bankruptcy.

     The ratio of total liabilities to stockholders' equity
is calculated by dividing the firm's total debt (current
liabilities plus long-term debt) by the stockholders'
equity.1.  It indicates the firm's ability to obtain addition-
al debt financing and is also useful in 'predicting bankruptcy,
A ratio greater than the critical level of 1.5 indicates that
a firm may be unable to borrow a large amount of money to
immediately fund remedial action.

     The final ratio is the ratio of earnings before interest
and taxes to interest payments, commonly referred to as the
interest coverage ratio.  This ratio indicates whether it is
likely to be able to obtain additional debt financing.  A
ratio less than the critical level of 2.0 suggests that the
firm may have difficulty financing remedial action if re-
medial action costs are greater than the available cash flow
in any given year.

     It is possible that a firm may pass one or two of the
financial ratios while failing the remaining ratios.  As
Exhibit 5-3 shows, the program will print a warning if the
^•Stockholders' equity includes common equity plus paid-in
 surplus and retained earnings less the value of any treasury
 stock.

-------
                             -50-
firm fails two or more of the three financial ratios.   This
warning is meant to (1)  indicate that it may be necessary to
allow an extended payment schedule so that the firm can
spread the remedial action costs over several years, and (2)
alert EPA that the firm may use these ratios or a similar
analysis to contend that it cannot pay any remedial action
costs.
INTERMEDIATE CALCULATIONS

     After calculation of the three financial ratios, the
program will ask the user if he wishes to see the inter-
mediate calculations of affordable annual costs.  If the user
does not want an illustration of these calculations he should
enter N or NO and either sign off or proceed to the next case.
If the user does wish to see these calculations, however, he
should enter Y or YES.  The program will respond by printing
the intermediate calculations in the format described below.
An example is shown in Exhibit 5-4.

     The program illustrates each of the steps required to
determine annual affordable remedial costs.  First, it shows
the calculation of residual cash flow for each year analyzed
(net income plus depreciation less required expenditures.)
Next, the weights used in determining the weighted average
    the absence of available data, the program may be unable
 to calculate one or more of the financial ratios.  The pro-
 gram will indicate which ratios cannot be calculated.  If
 one ratio cannot be calculated, the firm must fail both of
 the remaining ratios in order for the warning to be printed.
 If two or three of the ratios cannot be calculated, no warn-
 ing will be printed but the value of any ratio which can be
 calculated will be provided.
 The signoff procedure and the procedure for restarting the
 program are both explained in Chapter 2.

-------
                              -51-
residual cash  flow  are provided.1  The program then prints
the weighted average  and the  standard deviation of the
residual cash  flows.  Finally the program provides the
.equation used  to determine  the annual affordable  costs  and
explains how one-time charges are calculated.
 The more recent  the year  the  greater  the weight  assigned
 its annual  cash  flow.   Calculating  a  weighted  rather  than
 simple  average provides a better  estimate  of future per-
 formance, since  greatest  weight is  given to performance
 attained under conditions most likely to be similar to
 those currently  encountered by the  firm.   The  user should
 consult the Technical  Support Document for a thorough ex-
 planation of  the rationale employed and the calculations
 used in determining these weights.

-------
                                 -52-

                           Exhibit 5-1

                  AFFORDABLE REMEDIAL  ACTION COSTS
THIS PROGRAM WILL NOW DISPLAY A RANGE OF ANNUAL  COSTS  AND  ONE-TIME
CHARGES THAT XYZ CORPORATION      MAY BE ABLE TO AFFORD. THIS  IS  BASED
ON THE AVERAGE CASH AVAILABLE AND THE VARIATION  IN  THAT CASH FLOW OVER
THE PAST 5 YEARS.
4/25/82
CASE: TEST CASE #2
PARTY: XYZ CORPORATION
LOCATION: COSTON, MA.
REGION:   i
DATE FILED: 4/2/82
   PROBABILITY OF
 ADEQUATE CASH FLOW

         507.
         607.
         707.
         80%
         90%
         35%
         99%
ANNUAL COSTS
 AFFORDABLE
(BEFORE-TAX)

   171.43
   132.32
    90.44
    41.29
     0.0
     0.0
     0.0
ONE-TIME CHARGE
   AFFORDABLE
  {BEFORE-TAX)

       615.43
       475.04
       324.66
       148.20
         0.0
         0.0
         0.0
THIS MEANS THAT THERE IS A 60 PERCENT CHANCE THAT
XYZ CORPORATION      WILL BE ABLE TO AFFORD        41.28 DOLLARS
ANNUALLY OR A ONE-TIME CHARGE OF       148.20 DOLLARS
(ASSUMING THE FIRM WILL BE ABLE TO BORROW AGAINST FUTURE EXPECTED
EARNINGS).  REMEMBER THIS CALCULATION ALLOWS FOR SUFFICIENT FUNDS  TO
MAINTAIN THEIR CURRENT PLANT AND EQUIPMENT BUT WILL NOT ALLOW
THE FIRM TO MAKE ANY SIZABLE NEW INVESTMENTS.
   THERE IS A  50 PERCENT PROBABILITY THAT XYZ CORPORATION
WILL BE ABLE TO PAY THE COST OF REMEDIAL ACTION OF
                           500.00 DOLLARS

-------
cn
            -53-


CN
1
«1
4-1
»Q
-rt
*5
pa




























o
M
H
5§
PS
3
n
U
5
a
i-t
PC,'


























MMON FINANCIAL RATIOS
O
u

LU
s:
o
tn

UJ
h-
^[
_j
Z3
U
«J
-
f-
t-4
_J
H-l
DO

^
£

x
u
hH
X
3

tn
UI
a:
— f
j—
i— i
Q
Z
UJ
a.
x
UJ

_J
*
UJ _J
0- UJ
0 X
EQ I-H

i— <
i- x:
-<
X
t-
INDICATING THAT THE
_j
UJ
>
UJ
J
j
-i
U.
CO
in
tn
n
CJ
Z
1-4
N
CE
Ui
N
1-4
U.
a.

a:
o
u.

0
l-t
»-
f^
fV

LU
t5

o
LJ

h-
tn
LU
&.
LU

Z
>— i

UJ
X
I-
INDICATING THAT THE FIRM
TERM OBLIGATIONS.
_J i
UJ h-
:> o:
UJ O
-J X
tn

 z:
O 0
DO CJ
: Q

-------
               -54-
eo
en
FINANCIAL WARNING
CULATE SOME COMMON FINANCIAL RATIOS
_l
 M
H X
•H 3
_J
M in
CQ Ut
<£ CK
Z3
Ul >-
X M
H CJ
Z
Ul Ul
z. a.
M X
£ ui
CK
Ul -1
i- 
H- CO

Ul 
a
CJ

H
co
Ul
CK
Ul
H
2
1-1

Ul
X
H
CRITICAL LEVEL AND INDICATES THAT THE
MEETING ITS INTEREST PAYMENTS AND OTHER FIXED
>
Ul H
X _J
H Z3
U
3 «-•
O U.
_J U.
Ul HH
QQ Q

CO Ul
M >

-i
£ CK
CK Ul
HH a.
U. X
Ul
Ul
X CD
H M
2
O
_J
U.

X
CO

-------
                                -55-


                         Exhibit 5-4

                     INTERMEDIATE CALCULATIONS
WOULD YOU LIKE TO BEE THE INTERMEDIATE CALCULATIONS  OF  AFFORDABLE  ANNUAL
 COSTS?
YES

INTERMEDIATE CALCULATIONS OF AFFORDABLE ANNUAL COSTS
 YEAR

 NET INCOME
 PLUS DEPRECIATION
 LESS REQ. EXPENDITURES

 EQUALS CASH FLOW
 MULTIPLIED BY
   WEIGHT

 CONTRIBUTION TO
   AVG CASH FLOW
  1976

159.90
 59.00
 88.50
130.40

  0.09
 11.29
 YEAR

 NET INCOME
 PLUS DEPRECIATION
 LESS REQ. EXPENDITURES

 EQUALS CASH FLOW
 MULTIPLIED BY   '
   WEIGHT

 CONTRIBUTION TO
   AVG CASH FLOW
  1977

175.40
 E7.SO
101.40
141.BO

  0.12
 17.51
 YEAR

 NET INCOME
 PLUS DEPRECIATION
 LESS REQ.  EXPENDITURES

 EQUALS CASH FLOW
 MULTIPLIED BY
   WEIGHT

 CONTRIBUTION TO
   AVG CASH FLOW
  1978

206.30
 73. SO
110.40
169.50

  0.19
 29.95

-------
                                  -56-

                          Exhibit 5-4  (cont'd)

                        INTERMEDIATE CALCULATIONS
 YEAR

 NET INCOME
 PLUS DEPRECIATION
 LESS REG. EXPENDITURES

 EQUALS CASH FLOW
 MULTIPLIED BY
   WEIGHT

 CONTRIBUTION TO
   AVG CASH FLOW
  1979

237.90
 80.00
120.00
197.SO

  0.25
 49.95
 YEAR

 NET INCOME
 PLUS DEPRECIATION
 LESS REG. EXPENDITURES

 EQUALS CASH FLOW
 MULTIPLIED BY
   WEIGHT

 CONTRIBUTION TO
   AVG CASH FLOW
  1980

254.80
 86.60
129.90
211.50

  0.36
 76.27
AVERAGE CASH FLOW EQUALS
THE STANDARD DEVIATION OF THE CASH FLOW EQUALS
               184.98
                28.79
   A NORMAL DISTRIBUTION IS ASSUMED ABOUT THE MEAN.
TO ARRIVE AT THE ANNUAL COSTS AFFORDABLE THE FOLLOWING  FORMULA
is USED:
            (AVG - FACTOR X SD)/(1-TAXRATE)
WHERE:
            AVG - THE AVERAGE CASH FLOW
            SD = STANDARD DEVIATION OF CASH FLOW
            FACTOR = FACTORS FROM A STANDARD NORMAL DISTRIBUTION  TABLE
            (SEE TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR MORE  DETAILS.)
            TAXRATE = MARGINAL TAX RATE (ASSUMED TO BE 407.)
   THE ONE-TIME CHARGE AFFORDABLE IS THE PRESENT VALUE
OF 5 YEARS OF ANNUAL COSTS AT A DISCOUNT RATE OF 207.

-------
ESTIMATING NET INCOME FOR ADDITIONAL YEARS
APPENDIX A
     In some cases, data on net income may not be available
for the minimum required three years.  If net income data
are available for only one year, but related data are avail-
able for three or more years, net income may be estimated
for the additonal years.  The following example illustrates
how such an estimate could be developed.

     Exhibit A-l is a sample D&B report for an unnamed "ABC
Inc."  Exhibit A-2 is a worksheet from this report.^-
 In this example, the income tax rate is calculated as follows:

     Tax rate  =  taxes -=• income before taxes
               =  73.5  T (158.8 + 73.5)
               =  32%

     Also note that there appears to be a typographical error
in the reported data on "Other Assets" for 1979.  The accuracy
of this abnormally-low number can be checked by relying on the
following relationship:

     Total Assets  =  Total Liabilities  4-  Net Worth
     Current Assets  +  Other Assets  =  Current Liabilities
                       +  Other Liabilities  +  Net Worth
     194.9 + X = 95.8 + 129.3 + 263.1 or X = 293.3

     This check reveals that the report is, in fact, in error,
and that "Other Assets" for 1979 (expressed in thousands) is
293.3, not 0.293.

-------
                               -58-
ABC Inc. did not report net income data for 1978 or 1979,
but did provide sales data for the three years 1978, 1979
and 1980.  In addition, net income is provided in the notes
for 1980.  Net income for 1978 and 1979 could be estimated
by assuming that the ratio of net income to sales is the
same in all three years.  This calculation is done as fol-
lows:

     Ratio of income to sales in 1980  =  $ 158.8  =  .106
                                          $1503.8

     Estimated income for 1978  =  ratio x sales for 1978

                                =  .106  x  399.8

                                =  42.4

     Estimated income for 1979  =  ratio x sales for 1979

                                =  .106  x  987.1

                                =  104.6

In interpreting the program results based on these estimates,
the user should bear in mind, first, that the data are esti-
mates only and; second, that to the extent that the estimates
understate the variability of income the calculated ability
to pay will be overstated.  In most cases, net income varies
more proportionately from year-to-year than do sales and there-
fore this estimating procedure is likely to understate vari-
ability in net income.

     For some companies, it may not be possible to estimate
net income because data on sales are not reported for a
sufficient number of years.  In these cases, the user can
simply enter the same data two or three times in order to
obtain an estimate of ability to pay based on one or two
years of financial results.  This procedure inherently under-
states the variability of income and, again, will result in
an overstatement of the firm's ability to pay.

-------
                                            -59-




                                       Exhibit A-l


                                   DUN & BRADSTREET REPORT
fINANCE
 * A FINANCIAL  SPREAD SHEET  OF COMPARATIVES, RATIOS,  AND INDUSTRY AVERAGES
 * MAY BE AVAILABLE.  ORDER  A DUNS FINANCIAL PROFILE  VIA YOUR  DUHS PRIHT
 * TERMINAL  OR  LOCAL D£B  OFFICE
                                                   3;
                                                   *
J2/18/81
         Curr  Assets
         Curr  Liabs
         Other Assets
         Other Liabs
         Worth
         Sales
               Fiscal statement
         Cash               $
         Accts Rec
         Certificate of
         Deposits
                                Nov
    Fiscal
   30  1S78
   120,960
    73.398
   ^123,230.
    i> M , 'I 1 6
   116, 375
    Nov
 Fiscal
30 1979
Nov
  ^
dateTT NOV  30
    70,526
   206,930

     8,000
95
^
129
263
.92?
831
?9J$r
306
1t1
130,
 Fiscal
30 19CO
235,507
            Curr Assets
         Fixed Assets
         Real  Estate
   285,507
   'MS, 302
    85,000
1980:
Accts  Pay
Notes  Pay
Prov for  Costs
Accruals
Taxes

  Curr  Liabs
Notes  Def
CAPITAL STOCK
RETAINED  EARNINGS
* 67
25
25
20
283
82
5
116
,953
,755
, TOG
,95H
,223
, 993
,832
,000
,984
            Total Assets            788,810     Total    


-------
                                         -60-

                                 Exhibit A-2

                                   WORKSHEET
                      (dollar figures expressed  in thousands)
Name of Party    "ABC, INC."
Name and Address of Subject Company
  (if different)	
Name and Location
of Case
Financial Year
  Ends:
                 November 30
Estimated Remedial
  Action Cost
                                              Relationship  to  Party_
Financial Data for Subject Company:

   Year            Net^nooipe     Depreciation
                                       N/A
  19
  19
                       42.4*
                      104.6*
                      158.8
                                       N/A
                                       N/A
                                                    Fixed
                                                    (end  of
123. 2
293. S
503.3
Additional Financial Data for Final Year  19 80-.
  Current Liabilities
   (end of year)
  Long-Term Liabilities
   (end of year)

  Net Worth
   (end of year)
  Interest Expense
  Income Tax Rate


Source of Data:  DSB Report, 12/19/81

Notes:  **Es timated
                                             284.0
                                              82.8
                                             422.0
                                              N/A
*Not needed if depreciation data are available.
 5
•s^^.


 6.
                                              32%    %  (7

-------
UPDATING KEY PARAMETERS
APPENDIX B
INTRODUCTION

     The Superfund Financial Assessment System uses some
program-supplied data when:

     1)    the user fails to provide key data, and

     2)    calculating the firm's affordable remedial
           action costs.

These program-supplied data include:

     1)    a tax rate of 40 percent,

     2)    a ratio of depreciation to fixed assets
           of 0.05,

     3}    an interest rate of 20 percent,

     4)    a ratio of required reinvestment to de-
           preciation of 1.50, and

     5)    an exponential smoothing factor of 0.30.

The use of each of these factors is discussed in more detail
below.  This discussion is followed by instructions for up-
dating these factors.

-------
                               -62-
TAX RATE

     If the analyst cannot provide an estimate of the firm's
tax rate in the most recent year of the analysis, a default
value of 40 percent is assumed.  For some firms, this will
be an over-estimate of the average tax rate, since the max-
imum marginal tax rate is 46 percent.  This 40 percent tax
rate is also used as the marginal tax rate for all companies
when translating the after-tax affordable annual cost into
before-tax affordable costs.  This rate should be altered
when existing corporate tax rates are changed.
DEPRECIATION TO FIXED ASSETS

     In calculating the annual affordable costs, the cash
flow available to pay remedial action costs is estimated
by adding net income and depreciation and subtracting the
funds needed for reinvestment.1  if no depreciation data
are available, the program estimates the depreciation of
the firm.2  Depreciation is assumed to equal 5 percent of
fixed assets  (if fixed asset data are available).  Five  (5)
percent was selected as a conservative (low) estimate of
depreciation based on the assumption that the remaining fixed
assets would be depreciated over a twenty year period on a
straight-line basis.  If the estimated depreciation is low,
the amount of affordable annual costs will be over-estimated.
In a negotiation process it was felt that providing an over-
estimate of the firm's affordable remedial action costs may
increase the firm's willingness to provide additional data
on depreciation.
INTEREST RATE

     When calculating the one-time charge affordable, it
 As explained below and in the Technical Support Document:, the
 funds needed for reinvestment are assumed to equal 150 per-
 cent of the depreciation amount.
2
 This estimate is used only when calculating affordable re-
 medial action costs and not in the calculation of any of
 the financial ratios.

-------
                               -62-
TAX RATE

     If the analyst cannot provide an estimate of the firm's
tax rate in the most recent year of the analysis, a default
value of 40 percent is assumed.  For some firms, this will
be an over-estimate of the average tax rate, since the max-
imum marginal tax rate is 46 percent.  This 40 percent tax
rate is also used as the marginal tax rate for all companies
when translating the after-tax affordable annual cost into
before-tax affordable costs.  This rate should be altered
when existing corporate tax rates are changed.
DEPRECIATION TO FIXED ASSETS

     In calculating the annual affordable costs, the cash
flow available to pay remedial action costs is estimated
by adding net income and depreciation and subtracting the
funds needed for reinvestment.1  if no depreciation data
are available, the program estimates the depreciation of
the firm.2  Depreciation is assumed to equal 5 percent of
fixed assets (if fixed asset data are available).  Five (5)
percent was selected as a conservative (low) estimate of
depreciation based on the assumption that the remaining fixed
assets would be depreciated over a twenty year period on a
straight-line basis.  If the estimated depreciation is low,
the amount of affordable annual costs will be over-estimated.
In a negotiation process it was felt that providing an over-
estimate of the firm's affordable remedial action costs may
increase the firm's willingness to provide additional data
on depreciation.
INTEREST RATE

     When calculating the one-time charge affordable, it
1
 As explained below and in the Technical Support Document, the
 funds needed for reinvestment are assumed to equal 150 per-
 cent of the depreciation amount.

 "This estimate is used only when calculating affordable re-
 medial action costs and not in the calculation of any of
 the financial ratios.

-------
                              -64-
                             Factor

                             a

                             a (1-a)

                             a (1-a)2

                             a (1-a)3

                             a (1-a)4



           t= the most recent year of data

           a= the exponential smoothing factor

In the current version of the Superfund Financial Assessment
System, the value of a is 0.30.  The effect of this value is
to give the most recent year's data twice the weight of the
data for the year t-2 and three times the weight of the data
for the year t-3.
   Year

   t

   t-1

   t-2

   t-3

   t-4

where:
UPDATING THE ESTIMATES

     The above estimates are based on the current state of
the economy (current tax laws, inflation rates, and so forth)
and may become obsolete as a result of changes in the econo-
mic environment.  Thus it will be necessary to periodically
review these estimates and update them as required.  Exhibit
B-l provides an indication of when circumstances may require
updating these parameters and the name of the variable in
the program which should be changed.

     As explained in Exhibit B-l the parameters should be
altered when the economic environment changes or when the
values are found to produce results which are too high or
too low based on some actual experience.  Methods for esti-
mating new values are also suggested 'in this exhibit.

    .All of the parameters are defined at the start of the
program.  To alter these parameters, a programmer familiar
with the EPA IBM system should access the listing of the

-------
                              -65-
program (SUPERF), change the appropriate parameter value,
and recompile the program.

-------
                                                      -66-
>>
CU r-l
X 0)
4J 4->
cd
H TH •
O 13 g

& C
Qj § »!_}
3 vH X
r~f flj
Qj 4J S
> cu
^i cu
cd y js
CO 4->
0) )-l
CO rQ g
o 5
O X H
43 cd cu
u 4-) ,n
0)
4-1
CO
ri
3
o
y
CO

cu
^4
o
S

cd

cu
CO
o
o
ja

4J
a
CU
U
cu
to

C
O

*T3
CU
CO
cd


cu
3
iH
CO
>






•

cu co

CU 0)
3 >
r-i 0

> "cd

CO CO
4J
« (3
ca iH
0 0
O P.
O CM
CO

4-1
CO
CO
rH

^4
CU
^
0

cu
4-1
ca

co
CU ,13

•H C
to o
pj g
o
4-1

rH
cd
3
0*
cu

CJ
3

cd
£>

cd

cu
co
0
o
6
e
o
t-l
4J
ctf
i4
y
CU
I-l
p,
CU
t>

4-1
O

o
•H
4-1
id
to

CU
4=
4-1
storic
the
•H
& C
, "H
0
4-i C!
0
4-1 -H
o> 4-1
0 cd
y T-I
y
4-1 CU
(3 l-i
cu a.
to cu

0
y 4-j
en
4-> 0
co y
CO
 H f> 0)
cd co y co -H 3
> CU CU > 60
M I-l CO
Vj (30 )-i O CO
cu cu cu 4-i a)
,£3 CU to & i-l
OC > 0 O ^
•H T( B iH CS Cd
,13 60 • 4J
o td o cd
C8 O 4J Tl
4J to to
CU 4J O O 4->
CO /— - J3 f3
O -3- 6C CO r-l 0)
O . -H 4-1 • «J
js o cu rt o a)









cu

JJ

CO
cu
4-J
CO
*o

3

O
4J
C
cu

5
cu
60
J3
CO
J3
0

i5
qj
r-l
CO
H








W
cd
4.)

CU
g
0
a
c
•H

CU
4J
cd

o co
O. CU
to 4J
O co
O »





1
eg co

•H
4J |3
CO O
CU >rt
I-l 4->
a) cd
tl -H
c y
3 cu
!-i
4-J P,

CO T)
y
•H 4-1
4-J O
•rl
C 60
60 e
•H i-l
LO 4J




1
^
CU
a.
3
en

pj
iH

1 t
fM-f
3
CQ
cu •
to co
cu
O CO
4J CO
y
TJ
0 §
1 [ 1 It i







CU




60 sD
CU
•H
CO
4-1
3
O

to
CU
>
O
e

cu
4-1
CO


•H
rl
CM
§
to

u
a
cu
U
to
CU
a.

00
fH

O
4J

VD
CU

4-1
"^
T3
o
•H

CU
ex

13
CU

B
CU
4J
^
CU .

c 'm
cd si
4-1
j^ C3
0 g
•4-1 e
t i
cd cu
£3 ^
CO cd
n
T3 4J
(3
CO CU
0) CJ
60 to
C cu
co a.
^3
y oo

CU C3
4J (0
cd
}4 j^
O
c ^
O 4-J
•H
J-> >>
cd H
rH rH
4H CO
G y
M -H
O
'to 0 4J
0) O
a c (3
0
TJ -rl CU
CU 4-1 J-l
TJ M CO
C 0
cu 0,13
4J Q)
X CU N
CU 60 P*.
to H
C cd cd
CO rH (3
CO
(-1 CO
O 60
I4~tf ^ £«
O -H
CU 0)
4-* CU .*"*
cd €
to -H CO
4J S
CU to
60 IH -H
CO O 4-i


cu
4-1
co
cO

CO
3
o

]>4
CO

cd
JZ

^t
o

"rH
cd
y
1
,c
y






















•
CO
•H
>4H
                                                                                         CO   •
                                                                                     a)  a»  cu
                                                                                     >  cu  3
                                                                                     •H H r-i
                                                                                     60     CO

                                                                                     00^
                                                                                     4-1      CU
                                                                                         OJ  60
                                                                                     ca  i-i  co
                                                                                     CU  O  to

                                                                                     $  B  £
                                                                                     CO  co  co
                                                                                     CU  4-1
                                                                                     Tf  cd  C
                                                                                        T3 •'-d
                                                                                     CO
                                                                                         4J  4-1

                                                                                         CU  60
                                                                                         y 1-1
                                                                                         cu    a, o
 CO  CU  -H
p2  o  4J
                           CO
                                   cu  cu
                                   4->  4J
 I   CU
 4-1  4J
 CO  Cfl
 CU Orf
•H
 cu
                                                                                      I
                                                                                         O  O
                                                                                         O  4J
 c   e
 cu  en
 fi      f*
 O  r-t
 &  aj  60
 X  -H  C
W  4->  «H

-------
OCT  I  6 .1995
                                U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
                                Library. Boom 2404   PM-211-A
                                401 M Street,  S.W.
                                Washington, DC.   20460

-------