oo ff
                                                      EPA/60O/8-89/051
                                                      January  IV89
               HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS DOCUMENT
                           FOR 1,3-BUTADIENE
             ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA  AND  ASSESSMENT  OFFICE
             OFFICE OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
                  OFFICE OF  RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
                 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY
                         CINCINNATI,  OH  4526B

-------
i

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Pteasc read Inttntetiom on the rcverte before completing)
  REPORT NO.
  PA/600/8-89/051
 . TITLE AND SUBTITLE

 Health  and Environmental Effects Document for
 1,3-Butadlene
             3, RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
               PB91-216341
                                                           6. REPORT DATE
             «. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOH(S)
                                                           8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                            10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                            11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                            13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
 Environmental  Criteria and Assessment Office
 Office of  Research and Development
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 Cincinnati.  OH  45268	
             14. SPONSORING AGENCV CODE
                EPA/600/22
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
      Health and  Environmental Effects Documents (HEEDS) are prepared  for  the Office of
 Solid Waste and  Emergency Response (OSWER).   This document series is  intended to
 support listings under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)  as  well as
    provide health-related limits and goals for  emergency and remedial actions under
   e Comprehensive  Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability  Act  (CERCLA).
  oth published literature and information obtained from Agency Program Office files
 are evaluated as they  pertain to potential human health, aquatic life and environmen-
 tal effects of hazardous waste constituents.
      Several quantitative estimates are presented provided sufficient data are
 available.  For  systemic toxicants, these include Reference Doses (RfDs)  for chronic
 and subchronic exposures for both the inhalation and oral exposures.  In  the case  of
 suspected carcinogens,  RfDs may not be estimated.   Instead, a carcinogenic potency
 factor, or q^,  is provided.  These potency estimates are derived for both oral and
 inhalation exposures where possible.  In addition,  unit risk estimates for air and
 drinking water are presented based on inhalation and oral data, respectively.
 Reportable quantities  (RQs) based on both chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity are
 derived.  The RQ is used to determine the quantity  of a hazardous substance  for
which notification is  required in the event of  a release as specified under  CERCLA.
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a.
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                              b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                           c. COS AT I Field/Group
.8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

   ublic
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report I
  Unclassified
                                                                         21. NO. OF PAGES
84
                                              30. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
                                                 Unclassified
                                                                         22. PRICE
EPA form 2220-1 
-------

-------
                                         EPA/60O/8-89/O51
                                         January 1989
  HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL  EFFECTS DOCUMENT
              FOR  1,3-BUTADIENE
 ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA AND ASSESSMENT OFFICE
OFFICE OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
      OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
     U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
             CINCINNATI, OH 45268

-------

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please rtad liutructioru on the revene before completing)
  REPORT NO,
  PA/600/8-89/051
                              2.
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
  PB91-216341
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

 Health and  Environmental Effects Document for
 1,3-Butadiene
6. REPORT DATE
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHORISl
                                                           8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                           10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                            It. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                            13. TVPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
 Environmental  Criteria and Assessment  Office
 Office of  Research and Development
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 Cincinna±iJLOH  45268	
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
   EPA/600/22
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
      Health and Environmental Effects Documents  (HEEDS) are prepared  for  the  Office of
 Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER).  This  document series is  intended to
 support listings under  the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)  as well as
  o  provide health-related limits and goals for emergency and remedial actions under
  he Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability  Act  (CERCLA).
 Both published literature and information obtained from Agency Program Office files
 are evaluated as they pertain to potential human health, aquatic life and environmen-
 tal effects of hazardous  waste constituents.
      Several quantitative estimates are presented  provided sufficient data are
 available.  For systemic  toxicants, these include  Reference Doses (RfDs)  for  chronic
 and subchronic exposures  for both the inhalation and oral exposures.  In  the  case of
 suspected carcinogens,  RfDs may not be estimated.   Instead, a carcinogenic potency
 factor, or q1*, is provided.   These potency estimates are derived for both oral and
 inhalation exposures where possible.  In addition,  unit risk estimates for air and
 drinking water are presented based on inhalation and oral data, respectively.
 Reportable quantities (RQs) based on both chronic  toxicity and carcinogenicity are
 derived.  The RQ is used  to determine the quantity of a hazardous substance for
 which notification is required in the event of a release as specified under CERCLA.
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                              b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
              c. COS AT I Field/Group
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Public
                                              19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
                                                 Unclassified
              21. NO. OF PAGES
                 84
                                              20. SECURITY CLASS (This page/
                                                 Unclassified
                                                                         22. PRICE
EPA Font 2220-1 (R«v. 4.77)   PHKVIOUI KDITIQN i» OBSOLETE

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

    This document  has been  reviewed  In  accordance with  the U.S.  Environ-
mental  Protection  Agency's   peer   and administrative  review  policies  and
approved for  publication.   Mention of  trade names  or commercial  products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                       11

-------
                                    PREFACE


    Health and  Environmental  Effects Documents (HEEDs) are  prepared  for  the
Office of  Solid  Waste  and Emergency Response  (OSWER).  This document series
Is Intended to support  listings  under  the  Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act  (RCRA)  as  well as  to provide health-related  limits and  goals  for  emer-
gency  and  remedial actions  under  the Comprehensive  Environmental  Response,
Compensation  and  liability  Act  (CERCLA).   Both  published literature  and
Information obtained from Agency  Program Office files are evaluated  as  they
pertain to potential human health,  aquatic  life and environmental  effects of
hazardous  waste  constituents.   The  literature  searched for  1n  this document
and  the  dates  searched  are  Included In  "Appendix:  Literature  Searched."
Literature search  material  Is  current up  to 8 months previous  to  the  final
draft  date listed  on  the front  cover.   Final  draft document  dates  (front
cover) reflect the date the document Is sent to the Program Officer  (OSWER).

    Several quantitative  estimates  are  presented  provided   sufficient  data
are available.   For systemic toxicants,  these  Include Reference doses (RfOs)
for  chronic  and  subchronlc  exposures  for  both  the Inhalation  and  oral
exposures.  The  subchronlc  or  partial  lifetime  RfD, 1s  an estimate of  an
exposure  level   that  would  not  be  expected  to  cause adverse effects  when
exposure occurs  during  a limited time  Interval,  for  example,  one  that  does
not constitute a significant portion of  the  Hfespan.   This  type of exposure
estimate has  not been  extensively  used, or  rigorously  defined as  previous-
risk   assessment   efforts  have  focused  primarily   on   lifetime   exposure
scenarios.  Animal data  used  for  subchronlc estimates  generally  reflect
exposure durations  of  30-90  days.   The  general  methodology  for  estimating
subchronlc RfDs  1s  the  same  as  traditionally  employed for  chronic  estimates,
except that subchronlc data are utilized  when available.

    In  the case  of   suspected   carcinogens,   RfDs  are  not  estimated.   A
carcinogenic potency  factor,  or q-j*  (U.S.  EPA, 1980), Is provided Instead.
These  potency  estimates are  derived for  both oral  and  Inhalation  exposures
where  possible.  In addition, unit  risk  estimates  for  air  and drinking water
are presented  based on Inhalation and oral data, respectively.

    Reportable quantities  (RQs)  based  on both  chronic  toxlclty and carclno-
genldty are derived.   The RQ  Is used to determine the quantity  of a hazar-
dous  substance for  which  notification  1s required  1n  the  event of  a  release
as specified under  the  CERCLA.  These  two  RQs  (chronic toxlclty and carclno-
genlcHy)  represent two  of  six  scores developed  (the  remaining four  reflect
Ignltablllty,   reactivity,  aquatic  toxlclty,  and  acute mammalian  toxlclty}.
Chemical-specific RQs reflect .the lowest of  these  six primary criteria.   The
methodology for  chronic  toxlclty and  cancer-based  RQs are  defined  In  U.S.
EPA, 1984 and  1986c, respectively.
                                      111

-------
                               EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY
    1,3-Butacliene  Is  a colorless  gas  with  a  mild aromatic  odor  at ambient
temperatures (Hawley,  1981).   It  Is  soluble  In most common organic solvents,
but  Is  almost  Insoluble  In  water  (Klrshenbaum, 1978; McAullffe,  1966).   In
1985,  10  U.S.  manufacturers  produced  2.3  billion  pounds  of  rubber-grade
1,3-butadlene (USITC,  1986).   U.S.  production of all grades  of  butadiene In
both  1985  and  1986  was  estimated  to  be  -2.5 billion  pounds  (C&E  News,
1986).   l,3-Butad1ene  Is  used  predominantly In the  production  of synthetic
rubbers and elastomers (CMR, 1985).
    1,3-Butadlene  Is not  expected  to be  a persistent environmental compound.
When  released   to  the atmosphere,  1t  will  oxidize rapidly  with  several
oxldant  species.   The  dominant atmospheric  removal  process will  be reaction'
with hydroxyl  radicals,  which  has an  estimated half-life of 2.6  hours  1n a
normal  atmosphere.   If released  to  the  aquatic  environment, volatilization
and  oxidation   (by  singlet  oxygen)  are expected   to  be  the  significant
environmental  fate processes.   The  estimated  volatilization  half-life  of
1,3-butadlene from a  river  1 m deep  flowing  1  m/sec  1s  -2.2 hours.   The
estimated  half-life  of the  reaction with singlet  oxygen 1n sunlit natural
water Is ~1 day.   Aquatic  hydrolysis,  direct photolysis,  adsorption to sedi-
ment and bloconcentratlon  are  not expected to  be significant; 1f released to
soil, significant  evaporation  1s  likely to  occur.   Based on estimated  K
values  (116-288),  any residual  1,3-butadlene  In  soil   Is  susceptible  to
significant leaching.
    Atmospheric   emission  sources  of   1,3-butadlene   Include   Industrial
effluent and fugitive  emissions, forest  fires  and exhausts from automobiles,
dlesel engines and  jet turbines (Graedel, 1978;  Hayano  et  al.,  1985; Hughes
                                      1v

-------
et  al.,  1979;  Katzman and L1bby,  1975).   Based  on available monitoring data
(see  Table  3-1), a  typical  ambient  air concentration  of  l,3-butad1ene 1n a
U.S.  urban/suburban  area  1s  ~l-2  ppb.   Assuming  an ambient air concentration
of  1.5  ppb, an  average dally  Inhalation Intake  of 66  vq  has  been estimated
for the  U.S. urban/suburban  population.  An  NIOHS  conducted between 1972 and
1974  estimated   that  -65,000   U.S.   workers  are  potentially  exposed  to
l,3-butad1ene (NIOSH, 1984).
    The  only available  Information concerning the  toxlclty of 1,3-butadlene
to  aquatic  biota  was a  24-hour  LC5Q of  71.5  mg/i  for  plnperch,  Lagodon
rhomboldes  (Daugherty and Garret, 1951).
    1,3-Butad1ene  Is absorbed  after  Inhalation  by B6C3F1  mice  and Sprague-
Oawley  rats (Bond  et  al.t  1986).   Estimates of  absorption were  >4-20X  of
Inhaled  dose  for mice  and >1.5-17%  for  rats exposed  to  very  high  concen-
trations.
    Following Inhalation,  1,3-butadlene  1s  distributed  to  the   brain,  liver,
kidney and  spleen  of rats at nearly equivalent  levels,  and very high  levels
are found  In  the  perlnephrlc  fat (Shugaev,  1969).   1,3-Butadlene was  also
found to distribute  to the mouse  brain and the central  nervous system of the
cat following Inhalation exposure (Shugaev, 1969).
    The  primary  |£  vivo  metabolites  of 1,3-butad1ene  In   the blood of rats
and mice following  Inhalation exposure  appear to be 1,2-epoxy-3-butene and
butadiene dlepoxlde  (Bond et al.,  1986).   Saturation  of the metabolic  elimi-
nation  mechanism for  1,3-butadlene  was  approached  at Inhalation  exposure
levels >1000 ppm (2200 mg/m3)  In both  Sprague-Dawley  rats and  B6C3F1  mice
(Krelllng et al., 1986a,b;  Fllser  and Bolt,  1984).   The  maximal  metabolic
rate  of elimination of  1,3-butad1ene  (V   ),  however,   was   found  to  be
approximately twice  as high  In mice as In  rats.   Exhalation of 1,3-butadlene

-------
monoxide and acetone  has  been  demonstrated In rats exposed  to  l,3-butad1ene
by Inhalation  (Fllser  and  Bolt,  1984).   The primary j£  vitro metabolites  of
!,3-butad1ene(us1ng rat  liver  mlcrosomes)  are l,3-epoxybutene-3,  3-butene-
l,2-d1ol,   dlepoxybutene   and   3,4-epoxy-l,2-butaned1ol    (Malvolsln   and
Roberfrold, 1982).
    Excretion  of  radioactivity derived  from Inhaled radlolabeled  1,3-buta-
dlene  was  determined to  be  primarily  1n the  urine  and  exhaled  air  of
1,3-butadlene-exposed  Sprague-Dawley rats  and  B6C3F1   mice (Bond  et   al.,
1986).   These  routes  of  elimination accounted  for  -75-85% of  the  total 14C
eliminated.
    The  toxldty  of  1,3-butadlene  following  Inhalation  exposure appears  to
depend on  the  species of animal.   Adverse  effects attributable  to  1,3-buta-
dlene exposure .were practically nonexistent except for  Increased  salivation
observed  In  female  Sprague-Dawley rats  exposed  to  8000  ppm  (17,698  mg/m3),
6 hours/day, 5 days/week for 13 weeks  (Crouch  and  PulUnger, 1978;  Crouch  et
al.,  1979)  and In  rabbits and  dogs  exposed to 6700 mg/m3,  7.5  hours/day,  6
days/week for 8 months (Carpenter et al.,  1944).  The bone marrow appears  to
be a  garget site  for  1,3-butadlene  toxldty 1n  B6C3F1 and  NIH mice  (Irons  et
al.,  1986a,b;  Lelderman  et al.,  1986).   A  l,3-butad1ene-1nduced macrocytlc-
megaloblastlc anemia was observed In B6C3F1 and NIH mice exposed to 1250 ppm
(2765 mg/m3),  6   hours/day,  5-6  days/week  for  as  few as  6  weeks  (Irons  et
al,  1986a,b;   Lelderman   et  al.,   1986).   Chronic  Inhalation  exposure  to
1,3-butadlene  at >625  ppm  (1383 mg/m3),  6 hours/day,  5 days/week for  60
weeks  caused   gonadal  atrophy  In both  sexes  of  B6C3F1  mice   (NTP, 1984).
Nonneoplastlc  lesions  of  the nasal  cavity  of male mice  occurred at 1250 ppm
(2765 mg/m3) (NTP, 1984).
                                      v1

-------
    Several epldemlologlcal  studies  (McMlchael  et  al.,  1974;  Andjelkovlch  et
al.,  1976;  Matanoskl  et al.,  1982}  associate  work in the SBR  Industry  with
excess  risk  of  cancers  of  the  hematopoletlc  and   lymphatic  systems,  but
concurrent  exposure  to potential carcinogens  other   than  1,3-butad1ene  also
occurred.   Long-term   Inhalation  carclnogenlclty   studies   performed   with
B6C3F1  mice  (NTP,  1984)  and  Sprague-Dawley   rats   (Hazleton  Laboratories,
1981a) confirmed  that  1,3-butad1ene  1s carcinogenic   In  these  species.   Rats
exhibited  an   Increased Incidence  of  the  following tumors:   Leydlg  cell
adenomas, exocrlne adenomas  of the  pancreas, multiple mammary  gland  tumors,
folllcular cell adenomas and  carcinomas of  the  thyroid,  and  stromal  sarcomas
of  the  uterus-cervix.   The  most  prevalent  tumor  types  In B6C3F1 mice  were
malignant lymphomas associated with  the hematopoletlc system,  and  hemanglo-
sarcomas.  This mouse  strain  1s not only  much  more  sensitive  1n terms  of  a
carcinogenic  response  than  Is  the  Sprague-Dawley  rat,  but  the  tumor  sites
also  differ  In the two species.   Several  hypotheses for these  differences
have been postulated,   Including a faster rate of 1,3-butadlene  metabolism  by
the mouse  (KrelUng  et al.,  1986a,b}; limited  detoxification  by the mouse
leading  to   greater   accumulation   of  the  primary  reactive  metabolite,
1,2-epoxybutene-3 (KrelUng  et al.,  1987);  a   lower  absorption rate 1n the
rat vs.  the mouse (Bond  et  al., 1986);  and the  presence of  an endogenous
virus (MuLV)  In  the  B6C3F1  mouse strain,  which may   act  1n  combination  with
butadiene  to   yield   Increased luekemla-lymphoma  response  (Irons  et  al.,
1986a).
    1,3-Butadlene  Is   mutagenlc  1n   bacteria  with  activation   (DeMeester  et
al., 1980) and Induces  chromosomal aberrations  and SCE  In mice  (Tlce et  al.,
1987).   Data  from Hazleton Laboratories (198lb) Indicate  that  1,3-butadlene
Is a  teratogen when  pregnant  female  rats  are  exposed by  Inhalation  at  8000
ppm (17,698 mg/m3),  6  hours/day during organogenesls.

                                     vll

-------
    1,3-Butadlene has been classified  as  an EPA Group B? compound,  probable
human  carcinogen,    A   q *  of   2.4X10"1   (ppm)"1  or  1.8   {mg/kg/day)"1
expressed as  Internal dosage [or  9.0  (mg/kg/day)"1 assuming 2054  absorption
via  Inhalation  and  100%  absorption  from the  gut]  was  derived  as the  geo-
metric mean  of  q *s  developed from the data  In  male and female mice  in  the
NTP  (1984)   Inhalation  study.   An  RQ  of   1000 was  derived  for  systemic
toxldty from a  chronic Inhalation rat  study  {Hazleton  Laboratories,  1981a).
An RQ of 10 was based on carcinogenldty In  male mice {NTP,  1984).
                                     vM1

-------
                              TABLE  OF  CONTENTS
1.  INTRODUCTION	    1

    1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER	    1
    1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES 	    1
    1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA	    2
    1.4.   USE DATA	    3
    1.5.   SUMMARY	    3

2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT	 .    4

    2.1.   AIR	    4

           2.1.1.    Reaction with Hydroxyl Radicals 	    4
           2.1.2.    Reaction with Ozone 	    4
           2.1.3.    Reaction with Atomic Oxygen 	    4
           2.1.4.    Reaction with Nitrate Radical  	    5

    2.2.   HATER	    5

           2.2.1.    Hydrolysis	    5
           2.2.2.    Photolys1s/Photoox1dat1on 	    5
           2.3.3.    Mlcroblal Degradation 	    5
           2.2.4.    Volatilization	    6
           2.2.5.    Adsorption	    6
           2.2.6.    Bloconcentratlon	    6

    2.3.   SOIL	    6

           2.3.1.    Adsorption	    6
           2.3.2.    Volatilization	    7

    2.4.   SUMMARY	    7

3.  EXPOSURE	    8

    3.1.   WATER	    8
    3.2.   FOOD	    8
    3.3.   INHALATION	    8
    3.4.   DERMAL	   10
    3.5.   SUMMARY	   10

4.  AQUATIC TOXICITY	   11

    4.1.   ACUTE TOXICITY	   11
    4.2.   CHRONIC EFFECTS	   11
    4.3.   PLANT EFFECTS	   11
    4.4.   SUMMARY	   11
                                     1x

-------
                         TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  (cont.)
                                                                       Page
5.  PHARMACOKINETCS	    12

    5.1.   ABSORPTION	    12
    5.2.   DISTRIBUTION	    13
    5.3.   METABOLISM	    14
    5.4.   EXCRETION	    18
    5.5.   SUMMARY	    19

6.  EFFECTS	    20

    6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	    20

           6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposures	    20
           6.1.2.   Oral Exposures	    23
           6.1.3.   Other Relevant Information	    24

    6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY	    24

           6.2.1.   Inhalation	    24
           6.2.2.   Oral	    32
           6.2.3.   Other Relevant Information	  .    32

    6.3.   MUTAGENICITY	    33
    6.4.   TERATOGENICITY	    33
    6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS 	    37
    6.6.   SUMMARY	    37

7.  EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS 	    39

    7.1.   HUMAN	    39
    7.2.   AQUATIC	    39

8.  RISK ASSESSMENT	    40

    8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY	    40

           8.1.1.   Inhalation	    40
           8.1.2.   Ingestlon 	    40
           8.1.3.   Other Routes	    40
           8.1.4.   Weight of Evidence	    40
           8.1.5.   Quantitative Risk Estimates 	    41

    8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	    44

-------
                           TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  (cent.)

                                                                        Page

 9.  REPORTABLE QUANTITIES 	    45

     9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY 	    45
     9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY	    49

10.  REFERENCES	    52

APPENDIX A: LITERATURE SEARCHED	    68
APPENDIX 8: SUMMARY TABLE FOR 1,3-BUTAOIENE	    71
                                      xl

-------
                               LIST OF  TABLES

No.                               Title                                Page

3-1     Ambient A1r Monitoring Data for 1,3-Butad1ene  	    9

6-1     Inhalation Cardnogenldty of Butadiene  (98.9-100%
        purity) After 60-61  Weeks  of Exposure (6 hours/day,
        5 days/week) 1n B6C3F1 Mice	    26

6-2     Inhalation Cardnogenldty of Butadiene  (unknown  purity)
        In Sprague-Dawley Rats Exposed  6 hours/day,  5  days/week  ...    30

6-3     MutagenUUy Testing of 1,3-Butadlene	    34

9-1     Inhalation Toxldty  Summary for 1,3-Butad1ene	    46

9-2     Inhalation Composite Scores for 1,3-Butad1ene  	    47

9-3     l(3-Butad1ene: Minimum Effective Dose (MED)  and
        Reportable Quantity  (RQ)	    48

9-4     Derivation of Potency Factor (F) for  Butadiene	    50

-------
                             LIST OF  ABBREVIATIONS

ADP                     Adenoslne 5'-d1phosphate
ATP                     Adenoslne 5'-tr1phosphate
BCF                     Bloconcentratlon factor
CS                      Composite score
DNA                     DeoxyMbonuclelc acid
Koc                     Soil sorptlon coefficient standardized
                        with respect  to organic carbon
KQW                     Octanol/water partition coefficient
LCso                    Concentration lethal to 50% of recipients
                        (and all other subscripted  dose levels)
LD5Q                    Dose lethal  to 5094 of recipients
HEO                     Minimum effective dose
MTD                     Maximum tolerated dose
NADPH                   Nlcotlnamlde  adenlne dlnucleotlde phosphate
                        (reduced form)
NOAEL                   No-observed-adverse-effect  level
NOHS                    National Occupational Hazard Survey
PEL                     Permissible  exposure level
ppb                     Parts per billion
ppm                     Parts per million
RfO                     Reference dose
RQ                      Reportable quantity
RV                      Dose-rating  value
RV                      Effect-rating value
SBR                     Styrene-butadlene rubber
SCE                     Slster-chromatld exchange
TLV                     Threshold HmH value
UDS                     Unscheduled  DNA synthesis
v/v                     Volume per volume

-------

-------
                               1.  INTRODUCTION
1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER
    1,3,-Butadiene  Is  the  common  name   for   the  chemical  also  known  as
butadiene,   blethylene,   blvlnyl,   dlvlnyl,   trans-butadiene,   erythrene,
pyrrolylene, vlnylethylene  and  buta-1,l-d1ene  (SANSS,  1987).   The structure,
molecular  weight,  empirical  formula  and  CAS  Registry number  for  1,3-buta-
dlene are as follows:
                                 CH?=CH-CH=CH2
Molecular weight:  54.09
Empirical formula:  C.H,
CAS Registry Number:  106-99-0
1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
    1,3-Butad1ene  Is  a colorless  gas with a  mild  aromatic odor at  ambient'
temperatures  (Hawley,  1981).   It Is soluble  In  ethanol  and  methanol  and
readily  soluble  In most  other  common organic  solvents  (Klrshenbaum,  1978).
Selected physical properties of 1,3-butadlene are listed below:

Melting point:               -108.9°C                   Klrshenbaum, 1978
Boiling point:               -4.41°C                    Klrshenbaum, 1978
Specific gravity:
(liquid at 20°C)             0.6211                     Hawley,  1981
Vapor pressure, atm:
  at  -4.5*C                  1                          Perry and Green, 1984
  at  14.5'C                  2                          Perry and Green, 1984
  at  47.0°C                  5                          Perry and Green, 1984
Hater solubility:
  at  25'C                    735 ppm                    McAullffe, 1966
Log Kow:                     1.99                       Hansch and Leo, 1981
A1r odor threshold:          1.6 ppm                    Amoore and Hautala,
                                                        1983
0068d                               -1-                            .  09/14/87

-------
Flash point:

A1r conversion factors
  at 20°C:
-76°C

1  mg/m3 = 0.445
1  ppm = 2.212 mg/m3
Hawley, 1981
    Although l,3-butad1ene  Is a gas  at  normal  temperatures  and pressures,  1t

Is  easily   liquified   (Hawley,   1981).    The   liquid  material  polymerizes

readily, particularly  In  the presence of  oxygen,  and the commercial material

usually  contains  an  Inhibitor  to prevent  spontaneous  polymerlzaton  during

shipping and  handling  (Hawley, 1981;  Klrshenbaum,  1978).   Butadiene  under-

goes addition,  substitution,  oxidation  and D1els-Alder  reactions and  can  be

hydrogenated to butene and butane (Klrshenbaum, 1978).

1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA

    In  1985,  10 U.S.  manufacturers  produced  2.3  billion pounds of  rubber-

grade 1,3-butadlene  (USITC,  1986).   U.S. production of all grades of buta--

dlene In  both  1985  and 1986 was  estimated to be -2.5  billion  pounds  (C&E

News, 1986).  1,3-Butadlene  Is produced  by  the following manufacturers,  with

a combined annual capacity of 3.755 billion pounds (SRI, 1986):
                    Company
               Amoco Corp.
               Atlantic Richfield
               Dow Chemical
               DuPont
               El Paso Products
               Exxon Corp.
               Exxon Corp.
               Mobil Corp.
               Shell Oil
               Shell 011
               Texaco
               Texas Oleflns
                   Location
              Chocolate Bayou,  TX
              Channelvlew,  TX
              Freeport, TX
              Chocolate Bayou,  TX
              Corpus  Chrlstl, TX
              Baton Rouge,  LA
              Baytown,  TX
              Beaumont, TX
              Deer  Park, TX
              Norco,  LA
              Port  Neches,  TX
              Houston,  TX
Current  exports  of  1,3-butadlene  total  -125  million  pounds/year,  with

Imports totaling -500 million pounds/year (C&E News, 1986).
0068d
                                        09/14/87

-------
    1,3-Butadlene  Is  manufactured  by steam cracking  of  naphtha and gas  oil
fractions, which  produce butadiene  and  ethylene as  co-products,  or by  the
catalytic dehydrogenatlon of n-butene and  n-butane  (Klrshenbaum,  1978).   The
steam  cracking process  Is  the predominant  U.S.  production  process  (SRI,
1986).    The  Isomerlc 1,2-butadlene  Is  sometimes found  as  a contaminant  of
1,3-butadlene (Klrshenbaum,  1978).
1.4.   USE DATA
    The  use  pattern  for   1,3-butadlene  was  estimated  In  CNR  (1985)   as
follows:  styrene-butadlene  rubber,  37%;  polybutadlene  rubber, 22X;  adlpo-
nltMle/HMDA  (hexamethylenedlamlne),  11%;  styrene-butadlene   latexes,   9%;
neoprene, 7%; ABS  resins, 5X; exports, 4%;  nltrlle  rubber,  3%  and other,  2%.
The dominant  use  Is  the  production of synthetic  rubbers  and elastomers;  the
miscellaneous uses Include use  as  a  chemical  Intermediate for  the  production'
of 1,4-hexadlene and 1,6,9-cyclodecatMene (Klrshenbaum,  1978).
1.5.   SUMMARY
    1,3-Butad1ene  Is  a colorless  gas  with a  mild  aromatic odor  at  ambient
temperatures  (Hawley, 1981).  It Is  soluble In most  common  organic solvents,
but 1s  almost Insoluble  In water  (Klrshenbaum,  1978; McAullffe,  1966).   In
1985.  10 U.S.  manufacturers  produced  2.3  billion  pounds  of  rubber-grade
1,3-butadlene (USITC.  1986).  U.S. production of all grades of  butadiene  In
both 1985 and  1986  was estimated  to  be -2.5  billion  pounds   (C&E  News,
1986).    1,3-Butadlene  Is used  predominantly  1n  the production  of  synthetic
rubbers and  elastomers (CHR, 1985).
0068d                               -3-                              09/14/87

-------
                     2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT
2.1.   AIR
    Because  of  Its  very  high  vapor   pressure,  1,3-butacMene  will  exist
entirely  1n  the  vapor phase  In  the atmosphere.   It Is  extremely  reactive
with  various  atmospheric oxldants  and,  therefore,  does  not persist  In  the
atmosphere.   Although  1,3-butadlene Is   transformed  rapidly  In  the  atmo-
sphere, 1t has been  detected  as a commonly occurring atmospheric contaminant
(Section 3.3.), probably  because  of  Its  continual  emission to the atmosphere
from automobile exhaust, dlesel exhaust  and other sources.
2.1.1.   Reaction  with  Hydroxyl  Radicals.   The  recommended- rate  constant
for the  vapor-phase reaction of  1,3-butadlene  with  photochemlcally  produced
hydroxyl  radicals   In  the  atmosphere   Is  6.&8XKT11  cm3/molecule-sec   at
25°C  (Atkinson,   1985).   Assuming  an  average  atmospheric  hydroxyl  radical'
concentration  of   8xlOs  molecules/cm3   (U.S.   EPA,  1987),  the  estimated
half-life 1s 3.6  hours, which  Indicates  that  reaction with hydroxyl  radicals
will be the dominant atmospheric removal  process.
2.1.2.   Reaction with Ozone.   The  recommended  rate  constant for  the vapor-
phase  reaction  of l,3-butad1ene  with  ozone  In  the  atmosphere  Is  8.1x10~18
cma/molecule-sec  at  25°C (Atkinson  and  Carter, 1984).   Assuming  an  average
atmospheric  ozone   concentration   of   6xlOJ1   molecules/cm3    (U.S.   EPA,
1987), the estimated half-life 1s  -40  hours.   Acroleln  has  been  Identified
as one of  the  products of the  reaction  of  1,3-butadlene  with ozone  (N1k1  et
al., 1983).
2.1.3.   Reaction with Atomic  Oxygen.   Ihe  rate constant  for  the  vapor-
phase  reaction  of 1,3-butadlene with atomic  oxygen   (03P)  In the  atmosphere
1s  19.4xlO~12   cma/molecule-sec   at  24°C   (Atkinson   and  Pitts,   1977).
Assuming  an  average  atmospheric  atomic  oxygen  concentration  of  2.5x10*
molecules/cm3 (Graedel, 1978), the estimated half-life Is -16.5  days.
0068d
-4-
09/14/87

-------
2.1.4.   Reaction with  Nitrate  Radical.   The reaction with  nitrate  radicals
has  been recognized  as  a  potentially Important  night-time environmental  sink
for  some  chemicals.   The  rate  constant  for  the  vapor-phase  reaction  of
1,3-butad1ene  1n  the  atmosphere  Is  5.34xlO~14  cmVmolecule-sec  at  22°C
(Atkinson  et  al.,  1984).   Assuming an  average atmospheric  nitrate  radical
concentration   of  2.4x10*  molecules/cm3  (Atkinson  et  al.,  1984),   the
estimated half-life Is -15 hours.
2.2.   HATER
2.2.1.   Hydrolysis.   l,3-Biitad1ene  does  not   contain  hydrolyzable  func-
tional groups; therefore,  It  Is  considered  Inert  to  environmental  hydrolysis
(Jaber et al., 1984).
2.2.2.   Photolysls/Photooxldatlon.   Direct   photolysis  Is  not   environ-
mentally significant with respect to 1,3-butadlene (Jaber et al., 1984).
    Jaber  et  al.  (1984) estimated  the  aquatic  oxidation  rate constants  for
the  reaction  of  1,3-butad1ene with peroxy radicals  and  singlet  oxygen to be
2/M-sec  and  IxlO7  M-sec,  respectively.   Assuming  that  the  concentrations
of  peroxy  radicals  and  singlet  oxygen  In  sunlit  natural water are  1(T» M
and  10"12  M,  respectively  (Mabey  et  al.,  1981),  the corresponding  half-
lives  for  1,3-butadlene are  11  years  and  1 day.   Therefore, reaction  with
singlet oxygen 1s a potentially significant removal mechanism.
2.2.3.   M1crob1al  Degradation.   Limited  data  are  available  pertaining  to
the  environmental   blodegradatlon  of  1,3-butadlene.   Thorn  and Agg  (1975)
listed 1,3-butad1ene as biodegradable under  typical  biological  sewage treat-
ment  conditions  as  long  as  suitable  acclimation Is  achieved.   A  Nocardla
species  Isolated  from  soil  has been found  to use  1,3-butadlene  as  a  sole
carbon and energy source (Uatklnson and  Sommervllle,  1976).
0068d                               -5-                              09/14/87

-------
2.2.4.   Volatilization.   Based  on  measured  water-to-air  equilibria  data
(H1ne and  Mookerjee,  1975),  the  Henry's Law  constant  for  l,3-butad1ene  at
25°C  1s  0.0617 atm-mVmole.   This  value of  Henry's  Law  constant  Indicates
that volatilization from  water  will  be rapid.  Using the  method  outlined  In
Lyman et al.  (1982),  the  estimated  volatilization  half-life of 1,3-butad1ene
from a river  1  m  deep flowing at 1 m/sec with a wind velocity of- 3 m/sec  1s
-2.2  hours.   The  volatilization  rate  from  deeper  or  less  rapidly  moving
bodies of water will be slower.
2.2.5.   Adsorption.   Based  on  the  estimated   K     values   from  Section
2.3.,  l,3-butad1ene  Is  not  expected  to  partition  significantly from  the
water column to sediment or suspended partlculate matter.
2.2.6.   Bloconcentratlon.  The BCF values  of an  organic  chemical  can  be
estimated from the following regression equations {Lyman et al., 1982}:
                                                                        (2-1)
                    log  BCF  =  2.791  - 0.564  log MS  (1n ppm)              (2-2)
    For l,3-butad1ene,  the  BCF  values  calculated from  Equations  2-1  and 2-2
are  -19  and  17,   respectively,  based  on  a   log  K    of  1.99 and a  water
solubility of  735  ppm.   These BCF values Indicate  that 1,3-butadlene 1s not
expected to bloconcentrate significantly  In aquatic organisms.
2.3.   SOIL
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the  chemical   or  mlcroblal  degradation  of
1,3-butadlene  In  soil could  not  be located  1n  the available  literature  as
cited In Appendix  A.
2.3.1.   Adsorption.   The  K    of  an  organic  chemical  can   be  estimated
log BCF = 0.76 log KQW - 0.23
from the following regression equations (Lyman et al., 1982):
                     log  KOC  =  3.64  -  0.55  log MS (In  ppm)
                       log KQC =  0.544 log KQW + 1.377
                                               (2-3)
                                               (2-4)
0068d
           -6-
06/23/87

-------
For  1,3-butadlene,   the  K    values  calculated  from Equations  2-3 and  2-4
are  116  and  288,  respectively, based on a water  solubility  of  735 ppm and a
log  K   of  1.99.   These K    values  Indicate  high  to  medium  soil  mobility
(Swann et  a!., 1983);  1,3-butad1ene  1s susceptible  to  significant leaching
In most soils.
2.3.2.   Volatilization.  Because  1,3-butad1ene Is  a gas at  normal  tempera-
tures  and  pressures, rapid  evaporation from dry  surfaces  can  be expected.
In  addition,  1,3-butad1ene  volatilizes   rapidly   from  water   (see  Section
2.2.4.),  which suggests significant evaporation from moist soil  surfaces.
2.4.   SUMMARY
    1,3-Butad1ene 1s not  expected  to  be a  persistent environmental compound.
When  released  to   the  atmosphere,  It  will oxidize rapidly  with  several
oxldant  species.  The  dominant atmospheric  removal  process  will  be reaction*
with  hydroxyl  radicals,  which has  an  estimated half-life of 2.6  hours  In a
normal atmosphere.   If released  to the aquatic  environment, volatilization
and  oxidation  (by   singlet  oxygen)  are  expected   to  be   the  significant
environmental  fate   processes.   The  estimated  volatilization   half-life  of
l,3-butad1ene  from  a  river  1 m  deep  flowing  1  m/sec   1s  -2.2  hours.   The
estimated  half-life of the  reaction  with singlet  oxygen In sunlit  natural
water  Is -1  day.  Aquatic hydrolysis, direct photolysis,  adsorption to sedi-
ment and bloconcentratlon are  not  expected to be significant; If released to
soil,  significant   evaporation  Is  likely.    Based   on  estimated  K    values
(116-288), any  residual  1,3-butadlene 1n soil  1s  susceptible to significant
leaching.
0068d                               -7-                              09/14/87

-------
                                 3.  EXPOSURE
    An  NOHS conducted  between  1972  and  1974  estimated  that -65,000  U.S.
workers may be  exposed  to  1,3-butad1ene  (NIOSH,  1984).   Surveys conducted by
NIOSH  at  six  user  facilities  found  worker exposure  levels of  0.06-39  ppm
(0.13-86  mg/m3),  significantly  below  the  OSHA  standard  of  1000  ppm  (2200
mg/m3) (OSHA, 1985).
3.1.   WATER
    Ewlng et al.  (1977) collected surface water samples  from 204 sites  near
heavily  Industrialized  areas  across  the  United  States  and  analyzed  the
samples for a wide  variety of contaminants.   1,3-Butad1ene was Identified In
only one  sample.  The  U.S.  EPA STORET  data base  contained only one reporting
station for l,3-butad1ene;  the reported level of  1,3-butad1ene was 3 ppb.
3.2.   FOOD
    Pertinent  food  monitoring  data  could  not  be  located In  the  available
literature as cited In Appendix A.
3.3.   INHALATION
    Ambient  air monitoring  data  for  1,3-butad1ene are  presented  1n  Table
3-1.   These data   Indicate  that  the  general population  In  urban/suburban
areas  1s  typically  exposed to  an  ambient air concentration  of 1.5 ppb  (3.3
vg/m3)  and  an  average  Intake  of  20  m3  of   air/day,  resulting  In   an
average dally Inhalation Intake of ~66 >ig.
    1,3-Butad1ene  Is   emitted to  the  atmosphere   In  automobile  and  dlesel
exhaust,  In Incomplete  combustion  products  from  forest  fires, from effluents
and  fugitive  emissions  from  Industrial   manufacturing  processes  and  In  Jet
turbine exhausts  (Graedel,  1978; Hayano  et  al.,  1985; Hughes  et al.,  1979;
Katzman -and Llbby,  1975).   It  has also been  Identified 1n  tobacco  smoke
(Graedel.  1978).
0068d
-8-
06/23/8?

-------

















1
•I
3
CD
1
*
In.
O
l *j
CO m
O
kM
« B
«K «-
e

|


5
e
41
i



















i
k.
4)
oc






VI
1
i
u






e
o

II
c &
41 —
 >V U
•9 > rs* •*••
01 IB *x
'S ..F- "S
1— VI
V F- 1/t VI
C 41 ^ F»
*- C U 41
E 01 >
VI 3 r— 41
§<-• Ik r-
41
•*• X> w. 41
*• E i—
iv iv E .0
So IB
VI — «<
*~ 3 'S a!
& (• L. *J
=-il*
t— C •*
I. O —

IT
2
4)
•V
CD
*
CM

r>
gp|
1
O

^
1**
£
*•»
*«
1
CO
^M
en
o.
4>
-



X
^m

e
o
VI
i

is
i/i ,—
c
r* JZ
X? Oi
££


Ol
a.
u
w
^p 4)
a> vi
ki 3
01
•o at
•- i-
£3
o
U VI
u
«-• £
e £

E •
IV *
1^;
_ IV U
§ vi 3 *"
L. iv e oi
**- 41 VI tm
L. >a
B O V
•t> e u» 41

•— k. "c" C




^
i
un
fa
«;
i
«
F**
2
I
•o
e
VI
4)
^—
^
a>
» o

i^
IV ^
ss
r- a
pM»
 •£>
e r- 01
vi C*
eo e
Ol VI ^
£ Ol Cl
^L^" w*
41 L. 1 —
•** 3 Ol
CO 00 Z


41 vi
&. VI
O 4>
— • B
e vi
i £
VI r-
§ 2
•••• e
fg 4)
*• LI
VI
E
Ol —
E
— 41
E C
* L
•— _E _0
^C V) 13




41
Ol
"0


* i-
* 0i
O '
V 0


o
k.
4>
'i
>
'

p- «^
£ 3>



^ S
VI
• 41
4t •—
5 |
4}
> M
(X 2
§
9 ^
c c
fe 1
F- 41
X «


I!E
>« 3 »-
m O -0
« 41 3
B A
vi 41 t
Ol £ r-*
 01 41
E F-
a 
e -o
^ 41 41
Of 01 41
E F-
O >B 41


|

3
i

*
,_

o






ao
en

fe
3
E
F-
VI O
41

ai e


f 41 E
CO F- O
vi e vi
41 3
<-> •—
•
 bk.
> 3
^rf VI VI
k> k. 41

IV kl
k. • 41
3 *• >
CE CO u












































E
i
O
u

u
^
0068d
-9-
09/14/87

-------
3.4.   DERMAL
    Pertinent dermal monitoring  data could not  be located 1n  the  available
literature as cited In  Appendix A.
3.5.   SUMMARY
    Atmospheric   emission   sources  of   1,3-butad1ene   Include   Industrial
effluent and  fugitive emissions,  forest  fires  and  exhausts from automobiles,
dlesel engines and  jet  turbines  (Graedel, 1978; Hayano et al.,  1985;  Hughes
et al.,  1979;  Katzman  and  L1bby, 1975).   Based  on available  monitoring data
(see Table  3-1),  a typical ambient  air concentration of  1,3-butadlene In  a
U.S. urban/suburban area Is -1-2  ppb.   Assuming  an ambient air concentration
of  1.5  ppb,  an average dally  Inhalation Intake  of 66 »g  has  been  estimated
for the  U.S.  urban/suburban  population.  An NOHS  conducted between  1972 and
1974  estimated   that  -65,000   U.S.  workers   are  potentially  exposed  to'
1,3-butadlene (NIOSH. 1984).
0068d
-10-
06/23/87

-------
                             4.  AQUATIC TOXICITY
4.1.   ACUTE TOXICITY
    The  only  available Information  regarding the  toxlclty  of  1,3-butad1ene
to  aquatic  biota  was  a  24-hour  LC5Q  of  71.5 mg/n  for pin perch,  Lagodon
rhomboldes. a marine fish species (Daugherty and Garrett, 1951).
4.2.   CHRONIC EFFECTS
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the  chronic  toxlclty  of  1,3-butad1ene  to
aquatic  organisms  could  not  be located In  the  available literature as cited
In Appendix A.
4.3.   PLANT EFFECTS
    Pertinent data  regarding the effects  of  1,3-butad1ene on aquatic  plants
could not be located In the available literature as cited 1n  Appendix A.
4.4.   SUMMARY
    The  only  available Information concerning  the  toxlclty  of  1,3-butad1ene
to  aquatic  biota  was  a  24-hour  LC™  of  71.5 mg/l  for plnperch,  Lagodon
rhomboldes (Daugherty and Garret, 1951).
0068d                               -11-                             06/23/87

-------
                             5.  PHARMACOKINETICS
5.1.   ABSORPTION
    In  preliminary  experiments,   NTP   (1985a)   Investigated  the  Inhalation
absorption  of  14C-1,3-butad1ene   In  rats  and  mice  exposed  nose-only  to
concentrations  of  7-7100  ppm  (15.45-15,675 mg/m3)  for  6  hours.   Following
exposure  the  animals  were placed  In  metabolism cages  for measurement   of
excreted  radioactivity.   Based   on  the   excretion  of  radioactivity  and
plethysmographlc  data obtained  from  other  animals  similarly  exposed,  the
Investigators estimated  respiratory retention of  7.1,  3.1  and 1.5% of  the
Inhaled  dosage  1n  rats  exposed  to 70, 930  and 7100  ppm (154.5, 2053  and
15,675 mg/m3)  and  54, 9.6 and 4.7X In mice  exposed  to 7, 80 and 1040  ppm
(15.45, 176.6 and 2296 mg/m3),  respectively.
    In a published  version  of  these  and  additional Inhalation  absorption.
studies,  Bond et  al. (1986)  exposed Sprague-Oawley  rats  and  B6C3F1 mice  for
6  hours  to  various  concentrations   of   14C-1,3-butadlene   (four   to  six
animals  at  each concentration) by  nose  only  Inhalation.   The concentrations
of  l,3-butad1ene  for rats  were   0.14,  1.4,  12.1,  134,  1720  and  12,700
mg/m3.   Exposure  concentrations  for  mice  were  0.14,  1.4,  12.1,  145  and
1870  mg/m3.  At  the  end   of  the   exposure  period,   the  rats and  mice  were
sacrificed  and   placed   Individually   1n   a   desiccator  containing   enough
tetraethyl ammonium  hydroxide  to  digest the carcass.  Volatile  radioactivity
liberated during the digestion process  was  measured  1n the atmosphere of  the
desiccator,  and  samples  of  the  digest  were  taken   to measure  radioactivity
remaining In  the carcass.  Total  14C  retained  In  the animals  at  the  end of
the 6-hour  exposure period was estimated as  the sum  of  the  volatile radio-
activity and the radioactivity 1n  the  digest.   This  method [of  measuring the
absorption  and  retention  of  14C-labeled   1,3-butadlene  and  unidentified
0068d
-12-
01/21/88

-------
metabolites] Indicated  that  the  percentage  of Inhaled 1,3-butad1ene retained
In  the  animals  as   [i4C]-l,3-butad1ene  equivalents   [at  the  end  of  the
6-hour exposure]  ranged  from 4-2054 1n mice and  from  1.5-17X  1n  rats.   These
figures are measurements  of  radioactivity retained by  the  animal  at  the end
of  the  6-hour  exposure  period  and   do  not  Include  any  l,3-butad1ene  or
metabolites absorbed  and  exhaled during  the exposure period.    When  these
data  were  normalized  to  body   weight   for  each  species,  the  amount  of
1,3-butad1ene and metabolites  accumulated at  the end of  the  6-hour exposure
period  (1n terms  of  jimol   [14C]-1,3-butad1ene  equivalent/kg)  was  signifi-
cantly  larger   In  mice  (0.2-650  ymol/kg)  than  In  rats  (0.08-160  v
-------
mouse  following  Inhalation  exposure  and  was  fairly  evenly  distributed
throughout the  central  nervous system  of  the cat.  In  this  study (Shugaev,
1969), the elimination  of  butadiene from the brain and  liver  of  the  rat  was
examined by exposing animals  to butadiene  by  Inhalation  for  1  hour, and then
sacrificing the  animals and  determining  the  tissue concentrations of  buta-
diene at various  times  (0.1,  15,  30,  60 and 90  minutes) after termination of
exposure.   Butadiene  concentrations  decreased  steadily  In  the  brain  and
liver;  1n  rats  sacrificed  90 minutes  after  termination  of  exposure,  only
trace amounts of butadiene were found 1n-the liver and brain.
5.3.   METABOLISM
    In a  study by  Bond et al.  (1986)  (see  Section  5.1.).  B6C3F1 mice  and
Sprague-Dawley  rats  were exposed  by nose  only Inhalation  to 14C-l,3-buta-
dlene, labeled  1n the  number  1 carbon atom.  Concentrations  of 1,3-butad1ene
used  for  rats  were  134 and  1720  mg/ma  for  rats,  and 14.2,  145 and  1870
mg/m3  for mice.   After  2,  4  or  6   hours  of  exposure,  groups of  three
animals were  withdrawn from  the  Inhalation  chamber  and blood samples  were
Immediately taken and  analyzed  for  1,3-butacHene and  metabolites.   Ninety
percent  of  the  total  14C  measured  In  the  blood   consisted  of  volatile
butadiene  metabolites  (1,2-epoxy-3-butene  and   butadiene   dlepoxlde)  and
nonvolatile metabolites (unidentified).   The parent  compound 1,3-butadlene
and   radioactive  14CO_,   derived  from   1,3-butad1ene,   were also   found.
Species  differences  1n  metabolism  were  found  at  Inhaled  1,3-butadlene
concentrations  of  -130  and   1800  mg/m3.    Mice  had   significantly  higher
blood  concentrations  of  1,2-epoxy-3-butene  than  did  rats,   and rats  had
significantly  higher   concentrations   of   14CO_  In  the   blood   than  did
mice.  1,3-Butadlene and dlepoxybutene concentrations were similar.
0068d
-14-
10/14/87

-------
    A  study  of the  rate  of metabolism of  1 ,3-butad1ene  In  male B6C3F1  mice
was performed  by  Krelllng et al.  (1986a,b)  using  a  gas uptake method.  This
method  Involved  placing  a  group  of  mice   (usually  eight)  1n  a  desiccator
containing  Initial  butadiene  concentrations  of  between  10 ppm  (22  mg/ma)
and  5000 ppm  (11,061  mg/m3)  and  following  the  disappearance  of  1,3-buta-
dlene  (by gas  chromatography)  from  the   desiccator  atmosphere over  time.
That  disappearance  of  1,3-butadlene  from  the  desiccator  atmosphere  Is  a
measure  of  the  metabolic  elimination  rate  of  butadiene  1n  the  mice  Is
supported  by  the  observation that pretreatment with  dHhlocarb,  a  metabolic
Inhibitor,  decreases  the  rate  of  disappearance  of  1 ,3-butad1ene.   The
metabolic  elimination  rate  constants determined for mice  were  compared  with
those determined  for rats using  a  similar  gas uptake technique (Bolt et  al.,
1984).   At  all  exposure  concentrations,  mice  metabolized  1 ,3-butad1ene
faster than did rats.   The  metabolic elimination rate  for  butadiene In  mice
was proportional  to exposure  concentrations  up  to  1000  ppm  (2212  mg/m3).
At exposure concentrations  >1000 ppm,  metabolic  elimination  of 1 ,3-butad1ene
In mice  approached  saturation,  and a  V     for  the  1,3-butadlene  elimina-
tion  rate  was  calculated  to  be  400  ymol-h^kg"1.   In  rats  (Bolt  et
al., 1984), the metabolic elimination  rate  was also  proportional to  exposure
concentrations  up   to  -1000   ppm  (2212  mg/m3).   Above   1000  ppm,   the
metabolic  elimination  of  1,3-butadlene  in  rats  approached  saturation,  but
the   calculated  Vmax   for   rats   (220   pmol.h'ikg'1)   was   well   below
that calculated  for  mice.   Bolt  et  al.  (1984) also  observed  that  pretreat-
ment  of  rats  with  Aroclor  1254  to  Induce  the  1 ,3-butad1ene  metabolizing
enzyme  (presumably  cytochrome  P-450) Increased  the V     of the  1,3-buta-
                                                       max
dlene elimination mechanism.   In the Aroclor-pretreated  rats, saturation  of
this elimination mechanism was not observed up  to  exposure  concentrations  of
12,000 (26,547 mg/m3)  1 ,3-butad1ene.

0068d                               -15-                              10/14/87

-------
    When Sprague-Dawley  rats  were exposed  1n an Inhalation  chamber  (desic-
cator) to  concentrations  of 1,3-butadlene  (>2000  ppm or 4425  mg/m3),  which
are much  larger  than those required  to achieve saturation of  the 1,3-buta-
dlene metabolism mechanism, the exhalation  of  butadiene  monoxide  by the rats
was demonstrated (Fllser and Bolt, 1984).
    lii vitro  experiments  using liver  mlcrosomal preparations  from  rats  and
an NADPH-generatlng  system  demonstrated  that  1,3-butadlene  Is metabolized to
l,2-epoxybutene-3  (Halvolsln   et   al.,   1979).   Pretreatment   of  rats  with
phenobarbHal before  preparation  of  liver  mlcrosomes Increased the  rate of
oxidation  of  1,3-butadlene to  1,2-epoxybutene-3 by  the  mlcrosomal  prepara-
tion, and  treatment of mlcrosomal  preparation  with  SkF 525A  Inhibited  the
butadiene  epoxldase  activity  and  strengthened  the case  for  the  Involvement
of  cytochrome   P-450   In  the   mlcrosomal   epoxldatlon of   1,3-butad1ene..
l,3-Epoxybutene-3  undergoes  further  metabolism in  vitro  and reacts  with
mlcrosomal  epoxlde  hydratase  to  form  3-butene-l,2-dlol   (Malvo1s1n  and
Roberfrold, 1982; Malvo1s1n et al.,  1982)  or  1,2-epoxybutene-3 may undergo a
second oxidation  reaction  to  form dlepoxybutene  (Malvolsln  and  Roberfrold,
1982).   3-Butene-l,2-d1ol  may also  undergo a  second oxidation reaction to
form  3,4-epoxy-l,2-butaned1ol.    The  metabolic  pathway  of  1,3-butadlene 1s
shown In Figure 5-1.
    Species differences were  also noted In the  ability  of  liver  homogenates
to produce butadiene monoxide when  Incubated  with  1,3-butadlene (Schmidt and
Loeser,   1985,  1986).   B6C3F1  mouse  liver  preparations were  found  to have a
much  greater  butadiene  monoxide-producing  activity  when  Incubated  with
1,3-butadlene  than did  human liver  preparations, which suggests  that  the
mouse may  not  be a  good  model  for studying  the metabolism  of 1,3-butadlene
(Schmidt and Loeser, 1986).
0068d
-16-
01/21/88

-------
            CH8=CH-CH=CH2    i
                        WDPH
                          0^   *  tlcrosoies
              CH2=CH-CH-CHE
                         g
             (Epoxlde hydratase)
     OH  OH
      -l,e dlol
      MROPH
CH-CH-CH-CHe
 \
 \
    OH OH
           ,«-k»iM« diol
Cboth  «lereoi»o«er» productd*
                                          NOOPH,
                                                 A
                                            -CH-CH-^

                                                  dlepoxybutone
                                               
-------
5.4.   EXCRETION
    The  excretion  of  an  Inhaled  dose  of  radlolabeled  1,3-butadlene  was
measured  1n  Sprague-Dawley  rats  and  B6C3F1  mice  by  Bond  et al.  (1986).
Groups of mice were  exposed  to  1,3-butad1ene  concentrations  of 14.2, 145 and
1870 mg/m3  (four  animals at each  concentration),  and rats  (four  animals at
each concentration  level) were exposed  to 1,3-butadlene concentrations  of
134,  1720  and  12,700  mg/ma.   At   the  end  of  the  exposure  period,  the
animals were  placed  In metabolism  cages.   Urine and feces  samples  (collected
separately)  were  taken  at  various  times after   the  end  of exposure  and
expired air was collected 1n a  series of  traps designed to collect 1,3-buta-
dlene and  Its volatile metabolites.   The  traps  for  expired  air were sampled
for radioactivity at  the same  time that  urine  and fecal  samples were taken,
and this  sampling was  continued  for  65  hours following  the  termination of
exposure.   At all  concentrations  of  1,3-butadlene  tested, urine and exhaled
air were  the  major routes of  excretion of 14C for both  rats  and mice,  and
these  routes  accounted  for -75-85%  of  the   total  14C  eliminated.   The
relative Importance of the different  pathways  for  the  excretion of 1,3-buta-
dlene and  Its metabolites  varied  with  the  concentration of  1,3-butad1ene to
which  the  animals  were  exposed.   At  higher  concentrations  of  Inhaled
1,3-butadlene,  exhalation  of   14CO_   became   a major  pathway  for  urinary
excretion  of   14C.   In  mice,   the  half-time  for   urinary  excretion of  14C
was 4.6  hours and the  half-time  for  fecal excretion  of  14C  was  8.6 hours.
In  rats,  the  half-time for  excretion  of  14C  1n feces and urine were 22 and
5.6 hours, respectively.
0068d
-18-
10/14/87

-------
5.5.   SUMMARY
    1,3-Butadlene  Is  absorbed after  Inhalation  by B6C3F1 mice  and  Sprague-
Dawley  rats  (Bond  et  al.,  1986).   Estimates of  absorption were >4-20%  of
Inhaled  dose  for  mice  and >1.5-17%  for  rats exposed  to very  high  concen-
trations.
    Following Inhalation,  1,3-butad1ene  Is  distributed  to the  brain,  liver,
kidney and spleen  of  rats  at nearly  equivalent  levels,  and  very high  levels
are found  In  the  perlnephrlc  fat  (Shugaev,  1969).   1,3-Butadlene was  also
found to distribute to  the  mouse  brain  and  the central  nervous system of the
cat following Inhalation exposure (Shugaev,  1969).
    The  primary  1_n vivo metabolites  of 1,3-butadlene  1n the blood of  rats
and mice following Inhalation exposure  appear to be 1,2-epoxy-3-butene and
butadiene dlepoxlde (Bond et al., 1986).  Saturation  of  the  metabolic  elimi-
nation  mechanism  for  1,3-butadlene  was  approached  at   Inhalation  exposure
levels >1000  ppm  (2200 mg/m3)  In  both  Sprague-Daw!ey  rats  and  B6C3F1  mice
(Krelllng et  al.,   1986a,b;  Fllser  and Bolt,  1984).   The maximal  metabolic
rate  of  elimination  of  1,3-butadlene  (V    ),   however, was   found  to  be
                                           max
approximately twice as  high  1n mice as  1n rats.   Exhalation  of 1,3-butad1ene
monoxide and acetone  has  been demonstrated  1n rats exposed  to 1,3-butadlene
by  Inhalation (Fllser and  Bolt,  1984).  The  primary  j_n  vitro metabolites  of
l,3-butad1ene (using  rat  liver  mlcrosomes)  are  1,3-epoxybutene-3,  3-butene-
l,2-d1ol,   dlepoxybutene   and    3,4-epoxy-l,2-butaned1ol   (Malvolsln   and
Roberfrold,  1982).
    Excretion of  radioactivity  that   1s  derived  from   Inhaled  radlolabeled
l,3-butad1ene was  determined to be  primarily  In  the  urine and exhaled air  of
1,3-butadlene-exposed  Sprague-Dawley   rats  and  B6C3F1   mice  (Bond  et  al.,
1986).   These routes  of elimination  accounted  for -75-85%  of  the  total 14C
eliminated.

0068d                               -19-                             10/14/87

-------
                                  6.   EFFECTS
6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposures.
    6.1.1.1.   SUBCHRONIC — A   3-month   Inhalation   toxIcHy   study   of
1,3-butadlene was conducted by  Crouch  and  Pullinger  (1978)  and Crouch et al.
(1979).  Five  groups  of Sprague-Dawley  rats (40 male and  40 female animals
In  each  group) were  exposed  to  0,  1000  ppm  (2212  mg/m3),  2000  ppm (4425
mg/m3),    4000    ppm    (8849   mg/m3)   and    8000    ppm   (17,698   mg/m3)
(concentrations 1n  mg/m3  as reported  by authors),  6  hours/day,  5  days/week
for 13 weeks.   The parameters  examined  1n  the  exposed  rats  Included growth
rate,  food consumption, hematology  and  blood  biochemistry,  urine  analysis,
erythrocyte  and  brain  chollnesterase  activity, erythrocyte  osmotic  fragil-
ity,  neuromuscular  function  and  neutrophll  phagocytosis.    Macroscopic  and*
hlstopathologlc examinations  were also  conducted.   No  effects  attributable
to  1,3-butad1ene  exposure  were observed  In  any of these parameters  and the
only adverse affect reported was  Increased  salivation  In female animals that
were exposed to higher concentrations of 1,3-butad1ene.
    Carpenter  et  al.   (1944)  exposed  groups  of 24 albino rats,  12 guinea
pigs,  4  rabbits  and  1  dog  to 1,3-butadlene  by  Inhalation.  Animals  were
equally distributed by  sex except for  the  dogs, which  were  all females.  The
concentrations used  were 600  ppm  (1327 mg/m3), 2300  ppm  (5088 mg/m3}  and
6700  ppm  (14.822  mg/m3).   Exposure  was  for  7 1/2  hours/day,  6  days/week
for 8  months.   Chamber-exposed controls were  maintained.   Biological param-
eters  examined  were  body  weight, blood cytology,  fertility  (rats,  rabbits
and guinea pigs),  blood and urine chemistry,  kidney and liver weights (rats
only), ocular  examination  of rabbits  and  dogs, and general  organ  gross and
microscopic pathology.  The only adverse effect noted  was a decrease In body
0068d
-20-
09/14/87

-------
weight gain  In  exposed  rats and male guinea  pigs.   Body  weight  gain In rats
was <90% of  controls  only  at  >2300  ppm.   Quantitative data were not provided
for guinea pigs.   Carpenter et al.  (1944) concluded  that  1,3-butad1ene 1s  a
relatively Innocuous substance.
    Several  studies  have  Indicated  that  stem  cells  In  the bone  marrow  of
mice  are  a  target  site for  1,3-butadlene-lnduced  toxlclty.   Irons et  al.
(1986a) exposed male  B6C3F1 mice to 1,3-butadlene by  Inhalation  to 1250 ppm
(2765  mg/m3),   6  hours/day,  6  days/week  for  6-24  weeks.   Blood  and  bone
marrow were  examined,  and   treated mice  were found  to  have  a 1,3-butadlene-
lnduced  macrocytlc-megaloblastlc  anemia.   Lelderman  et  al.   (1986)   also
exposed male B6C3F1  mice  to  1,3-butad1ene  by  Inhalation to 1250  ppm  (2765
mg/m3).  The exposure schedule  used  was 6  hours/day,  5  days/week  for  6  or
30-31  weeks.   In  yj^o  and In  vitro  assays  were  used  to  Investigate  the'
proliferation and  differentiation  of bone  marrow cells.   After  6  weeks  of
exposure to  1,3-butad1ene,  Lelderman et  al.  (1986) concluded that there were
alterations  In bone marrow  stem cell development.
    Studies  of  1,3-butadlene toxlclty using  B6C3F1  mice  are complicated  by
the  presence of  an  endogenous  type  C  retrovlrus  (MuLV)  present  1n  this
strain.  Irons  et  al.  (1986b)  exposed   eight male NIH Swiss mice,  which  do
not possess  this virus, to  1,3-butadlene by  Inhalation at a concentration of
1250  ppm  (2763 mg/m3), 6   hours/day,  5  days/week for  6  weeks.    At  the end
of  the exposure  period,   peripheral  blood  was  drawn  and analyzed  and  the
cellularlty  of  bone  marrow  from  the femur  was  determined.   Irons et  al.
(1986b)  concluded  that  1,3-butad1ene exposure caused  alterations  In  bone
marrow precursor cell  activity and that the changes 1n  the bone marrow and
peripheral   blood   were   Indicative  of   a  1,3-butadlene-lnduced  macrocytlc-
0068d                               -21-                             09/14/87

-------
megaloblastlc anemia.   It  was also  concluded  from this study  that  the  bone
marrow toxldty  Induced by exposure  to  1,3-butadlene Is Independent of  the
presence of the murlne MuLV virus.
    The effects of  Inhalation exposure to  1,3-butad1ene  on  the  Immune system
were  examined  by  Thurmond  et al.  (1986).  B6C3F1  mice were  exposed  to  a
1,3-butadlene  concentration  of  1250  ppm  {2765  mg/m3),   6  hours/day,  5
days/week for 6 or  12  weeks.  Lymphold organ  hlstopathology was examined  and
Immune  function  assays were  performed  to  evaluate  specific  humoral  and
cell-mediated  Immunity;  no significant  1mmunolog1cal defects  were  detected
In the 1,3-butadlene-exposed mice.
    A  number  of  Russian  studies, available  only as  brief abstracts,  have
been performed on  the  subchronlc  Inhalation  toxldty  of 1,3-butad1ene.   Rats
exposed  for  81  days  (exposure  schedule  unknown)   to  1,3-butadlene  (30
mg/ma)  developed  dystrophlc  processes   In  the   tissue  structures  of  the
kidneys and  heart  (Nlklforova et al.,   1969)  and structural changes In  the
spleen (Molodyuk  et al.,  1969).  Rats exposed for 81  days  to  1,3-butadlene
(30  mg/m3  and  300 mg/m3)  developed erythrocytosls  and leukocytosls  (R1pp
and  lyutlkova,  1966), and  rabbits  exposed  to  1,3-butad1ene  (200  mg/J.;
exposure schedule  not  given)  showed  an  Increased ratio of  erythroblasts  to
granulocytes   (Pokrovskll   and    Volchkova,   1968).    Experimental   animals
(species not reported)  exposed  to 1,3-butad1ene by Inhalation  (1.0,  3.0  and
30 mg/m3) had  morphological changes  In  the  liver and  kidneys,  disturbances
of  the central  nervous  system,  and  changes   In  the  Immune   system  (Rlpp,
1969).  Rats  exposed  by  Inhalation  to  1,3-butadlene  (100  mg/l),  6  hours/
day, 6 days/week  for  4.5  months  had  alterations  1n  the bronchial  epithelium
of the  lung  and a  hypersecretory state  In the connective  tissue  structures
of the  lungs (Kuz'mln, 1969).   These studies  were  not available  In suffi-
cient detail to assess their reliability.
0068d
-22-
06/23/87

-------
    6.1.1.2.   CHRONIC — In  an   Inhalation  study   of   the  toxlclty   of
l,3-butad1ene  In  male  and  female  B6C3F1   rake   (NTP,  1984),  exposure  to
1,3-butad1ene, 6 hours/day, 5 days/week for  60-61  weeks/at  concentrations  of
0,  625  ppm  (1383  mg/m3}  or  1250  ppm  (2765 mg/ma)  caused  gonadal  atrophy
In  both  sexes  at  both  concentrations.   Male  B6C3F1  mice  exposed  to  2765
mg/m3 had  nonneoplastlc  lesions  of the  nasal  cavity;  the details  of  this
study are presented 1n Section 6.2.1.
    Chronic  toxlclty  data  were obtained  from the  105- to  111-week  cancer
study by Hazleton  Laboratories  (1981a)  (also reported In Owen  et  al.,  1987)
(Section  6.2.1.).   In  this experiment,  Sprague-Dawley rats  of  both  sexes
were  exposed  to 1000  or  8000  ppm (2212  or 17,698 mg/m3),  6 hours/day,  5
days/week.  There  were  no effects  on  overall  body weight  gain,  hematology,
blood  biochemistry,   urlnalysls,   neuromuscular   tests  or  gross  pathology.1
Survival was  significantly reduced In  both sexes at  8000  ppm, and  rats  at
this  level  exhibited  ataxla  and  ocular  and  nasal  discharge.   Increased
absolute and  relative  liver weights were  observed In 8000 ppm rats  of  both
sexes and  1n  1000  ppm females,  but  hlstopathologlc changes  In the liver  were
not  observed  at either  concentration,  and  the elevated liver weights  were
attributed to enzyme  Induction,  an adaptatlve rather  than  a  toxic  response.
Increased absolute and relative heart, lung  and kidney weights  were observed
In 8000 ppm  males.  Hales at 8000  ppm had  an  Increased  Incidence  of nephro-
pathy that  was  considered  partially  responsible  for  the decreased survival
observed 1n this group.
6.1.2.   Oral Exposures.
    6.1.2.1.   SUBCHRONIC -- Rats   (strain   not    specified)   were   given
1,3-butad1ene  orally  at  100  mg/kg/day  for  2.5  months   (Donetskaya   and
Schvartsapel, 1970).   Granular and hydropic dystrophy,  cytolysls  and  dis-
turbances of  permeability  were  found  In the cells  of  the  brain,  sympathetic

0068d                               -23-                             01/13/88

-------
ganglia, heart, liver and  kidneys.   Lymphohlstlocytlc  Infiltration  was  found
In the  lungs,  heart,  liver,  kidneys and gastrointestinal tract.  A thicken-
ing of the Interalveolar septa was also found In the lungs.
    6.1.2.2.   CHRONIC — Pertinent data regarding  chronic  oral exposure  to
1,3-butadlene  could not  be located  In  the  available literature as  cited  In
Appendix A.
6.1.3.   Other  Relevant  Information.   The  oral  L05Q  for  1,3-butadlene  Is
5480  mg/kg In  the rat  and  3210  mg/kg 1n  the mouse  (Sax,  1984).   Humans
exposed  to  2000   ppm  (4425  mg/m3),  4000  ppm  (8849  mg/m3)  or  8000  ppm
{17,698 mg/rn3}  1,3-butadlene  for  6-8  hours  experienced a  slight  Irritation
of the eyes (Carpenter et  al.,  1944).   Inhalation  of  1,3-butadlene  (exposure
schedule and  concentration  not  reported)  by mice Increased liver content  of
ATP  and Increased  the   ratio  of  ATP  to ADP  (Oura et  al.,  1967).   Direct'
dermal  contact with  1,3-butadlene  caused  burns  and   frostbite  (Sandmeyer,
1981).
6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY
6.2.1.   Inhalation.  Human  epldemlologlc  data  regarding  the  carclnogenlc-
Ity of 1,3-butad1ene are restricted  to  several  studies  of workers  exposed 1n
the production  of  SBR.   SBR  usually  1s  made up of 26% 1,3-butadlene  and  9%
styrene  (U.S.  EPA,  1985).    Exposure   to  many  other  chemicals  Including
toluene and benzene also occurred;  exposures  usually were not  quantified and
the effects  of 1,3-butadlene Independent from  other  chemicals could  not  be
evaluated.   Some  of  these epldemlologlc  studies  (HcMlchael  et al.,  1974;
Andjelkovlch  et al.,  1976; Melnhardt  et  al., 1982) suggested  a  correlation
between  SBR  production  and  excess  cancer  risk;  others  (Checkoway  and
Williams,  1982;  Matanoskl  et  al., 1982) did  not.   The strengths  and weak-
nesses  of  these  studies  have  been  reviewed  extensively  by  the   U.S.  EPA
(1985).  [It  Is beyond the scope of this task to repeat that effort here].
0068d
-24-
02/06/89

-------
    Two  long-term  Inhalation  cardnogenldty studies, one  using  B6C3F1  mice
(NTP, 1984) and one  using  Sprague-Dawley  rats  (Hazleton  Laboratories,  1981a;
Owen  et  al.,   1987)  established   1,3-butadlene  as  a  carcinogen  In  both
species.  NTP  (1984)  exposed  groups of 50 male and 50 female mice  to  0,  625
or 1250  ppm (0,  1383 or 2765 mg/m3),  6 hours/day,  5 days/week for  60 weeks
(males)  or  61  weeks   (females).  The  experiment  was designed with  a 103- to
104-week exposure period, which was  shortened because of  high mortality pri-
marily  associated  with -neoplasla.   Incidences  of  statistically  significant
tumors are  summarized  In Table 6-1.   The  tumor  type with  the highest overall
Incidence  1n  both sexes  was a  lymphoma associated  with  the  hematopoletlc
system.  Other  tumors with statistically Increased Incidences  In  both sexes
Included alveolar  or bronchlolar  adenomas or carcinomas,  hemanglosarcoma  of
the  heart   and  squamous cell  neoplasm  of  the  forestomach.   The  Increased'
Incidence of  hemanglosarcoma of the  heart  following 1,3-butadlene  exposure
Is significant  because this  Is  a   rare  tumor  type  1n  this strain  of mouse
(Wooder, 1986).  1,3-Butadlene-exposed  female 66C3F1  mice also  had Increased
Incidences  of hepatocellular adenoma  and  carcinoma,  aclnar  cell  carcinoma of
the mammary gland and granulosa cell neoplasm of the ovary.
    In  the  Hazleton  Laboratory  (1981a)  study,  groups  of  110  male and  110
female  Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed  to 1,3-butad1ene  at  concentrations
of  1000  ppm  (2212  mg/m3)  or   8000  ppm  (17,698  mg/ma)  for   111   weeks
(males)  or  105 weeks  (females).   Ten  rats/sex/group were sacrificed  at  52
weeks  for  gross  and  hlstopathologlcal  examination.    Male  rats  had  an
Increased Incidence  of  Leydlg cell  adenomas  and  carcinomas  of  the testes and
an  Increased  Incidence  of  exocMne  adenoma of  the  pancreas  (Table  6-2).
Female  rats had  an Increased Incidence of multiple mammary gland tumors,  fo
Hcular  cell adenomas  and  carcinomas  of  the  thyroid,  and  stromal  sarcomas of
the uterus-cervix.

0068d                               -25-                             01/13/88

-------







O)
u
ac

<~
">^m
4-> <_»
— MO
* ff\
In* ^B
3
O. C
o~
O -X
1 O>
c* 3
• X.
00 v»
at ^^
^•^ ^
0 '
e un
»
*0 *O
4-» "O
3 "X
CO i/»
k
«- 3
0 0
•C
•2*uD
U
«- a>
C k
Ot 3
0 0
c a.
«- X
U uj
k
jWj (^^
0 O

C (^
0 J*
4- O>

e i
^^ ^M
^^ ^?
k
01
u.






pM» ^J
rO U
U C
•^* i"0
*- u.
^5 C
4rf O>
tfl «-


U
U C
O ft»
3 "-
h- U
e
1—1









o.
9^
h-

!M>



|M»










e
'O
o>
o

V

19

X
CO

%"*
O Q.

•^^


i— I— CM CO i— i— i—
O O CO vO O O O
O O O CO O O O
o o o o o o o
V V II il V V V
Q. Q. Q. O. Q. O. Q.





^^ C3 c3 at at ^^ ^t
LT> tft ui ^ ^- un *
CM O O O **• CO " tO
r— CM f


•



u 3 (_ 55
^ € tj &
r-* O ^— O
o e i_ o c
«- — O «- —
f w S JS o 5
u i- E v> o L. E
C fQ On C  e A g
ft) f111* (Q I""* *O ^<| 0^
<0<«r- .CiBU'B'Oi— «





u u

^^ ^jjj£ ^^
^ ^J ^^
"o E "o
ex o ex
0 E •»> OS
4^ ^^ 4^ Vt 4^ &f 4^
CD ^3 4^ ^— ^J O) ^9 4>^ ^B
c Eo'Ok c SI/>> 4» o 3 a> >» a>
r — fVtfU. i — .Cl/tf


w
X.
O U1 O>
^D
^_
CO
CO

CO
0
o
o
II
ex





o
«*•
ji










^
o
«rt


o

I"— flj

ex o

ex *^
u
r" k-
^MM *O
(Q U







^2
u


(/<
k
0










jHHm ffmi
O 0
o o
0 C5
V V
ex a





at a
•«*• tn
>» X
r- CM






k g

»— o
o e

f U
U k
C  S i"

•0  '?••-•
e E vi

r— .C irt


r
X.
o a>
CNJ
i— CO
^o
r-

*&
o
o
o
g*





o^
^
Xk












s
Q
u

M
V*
o
4fM>
en
e

flj
^











<-l
k
IQ










0068d
-26-
06/23/87

-------

















*M*
^
. >
0
U
^^
1
Nfc*
LLJ
..J
aa


















i— 0>
u c
•*•• u
tfl ^
19 c
t-» O>
Lo
O>
u
1- C
E -O
3 —
c




flj
ex
^^
^»

h-






C
i^
o»
o

—•
o>
^
*-
X
to


O CX
a ex
"~ '


Mr— »O r— i— vCf-»i— o
f— OOOO<— OOr-O
^•ooooooooo

oooooeoooo
clclcxexexexexexexex


u
^ CT^ O O 9 O O Cfl CO Cft
^^cnm^bnm^-^^

i— C*5(— OOOOOCMO

fe|
^« O ^~ O
i. O C u O C
0 — — 0 — —
-C u 3 *• "
v>o«_ Sviu i— u L.

§O O W B ^* CU O O
^1- U 0 3 •— U U
ex o CU S 8 •— u CX — (- 4l E
^*O'~^ >» a» r- <9 CU Ort3 t. fl* r— TJ >»
(QO fl3t)r~ jC >QU£ t)O CT C fO  u c o <— o>
§0 E *o *- *o
CL O *tj O dhi CL
•^ OS*- i-t- OS
OJ Ol «4-*t_CU Ol O £ t_ (71 5 —•
i- c EI/I>VI_ > E t> e Ei*
O 3 0>>>CUO -- 1_ 15 > 3 O> >>
*»- p— finfu- i— OS O i— JC vt

X i^i ^
A n
^ ^
o o> o en o»
JCS Se
f^ CO p»
S S
CM r-


0
o

o
V
ex



CO
•^
f—







U'

•9
1^
o
c


•*=







^J
^
T3









0068d
-27-
09/14/87

-------
J3
r- 0»

u
L. C
§o>
•o

I— "u
1— 1





Ol
CL
— » >»
h-
4^
e t_
0 g
u g
"""" 1—
f
t
<4>

LLJ
_J
0
<
^

C


t-
O

•^^

^B
<«
1—
X
Jll
w
CO


11
o ex



oo CM CM o i— co
r- CO «*> i- 0 0
O CM CM O O O
• * * • • •
O O O O O O
II II II II V il
ex CL ex ex ex GL

CM r* en un en 01
*• «*•*»•*• 5- *>
>. "N. >» >. >^ >»
Uf> CM CM \D CO O
CM r-
fe u — U L.
§»O  u i^ E L. «
ex o w Ol E
^ ro 0)TS W k>Ol r- "O >»
fOU f>«  «-
0
>> ex
^j r f^ ^"
•f* !•» O C
t« t_ rg >i ^J O
0» 0> E U D> 

3 o; >» u- r- £ O •— -C Wi i^ t^ 0 A ^ ^ JCi1 SI UD CM ^ ^ CO 00 >D co r» (— CM i— r- 1^. CM i— O O fM t— O o o o o o « « • * « o o o o o V V il il V ex ex ex ex ex y on on en on co * * ^- * «»• >» X >» "N» X, oo o in >o co p— i" • ^ 1 s o o e L. C — 0 «- U fu u. «A b. (_ «0 O — E 0> O «rt E "- CL O U «B O Irt en roc OS t- i— 10 e ex— *• o >Q a r- Q 0 i— §0) >1 *J i« <_ m >, L. «J 4) g t Mt e ^k ^5 **^ •9 IM. ^ B fQ 0) O *^- A > £ U. r- go 0068d -28- 09/14/87


-------




























*
c
o
u
*"""*

1
vO

^j
ao






























<^
e

a*
§
c

flj

^B
3
0)
^3
1
o> »-
> u
(— Q.
^
VI O*
•ss
1°
— •* pw»
f^
*^ O
rQ «^
*1
*^ jC
o> x <->
o ^
•o .e ir
MM* ^| »
i o o
cv>
u- -. X
** O flj
o **
-^ u-
5 *o °

"« s> **
3 -4-* 3

e
is
"2
in g
5
£X

3 ^
° O»
&"s.
o ^2
^ n
^» P
^M ^

,.
^^
•o
3
tn
u-
o

Jc
^^


^
^H»
CO
0068d





*
w^
^B

IQ
•o
U-
o

O)
•g
c

1/1
3
"0
U
un
J*
0»
3

i—
i
O
sD
•*->
•o
O)
C
"i
*•

3
>,
•o o>
3 ^-^
•** ro
 o>
i— <


• • -
^^ • *
•o >»
3 U
 3
o-
(4- O>
o -o
<
^ ^~
0> i—
J< U
'Q d)
Ol >
X O
t »
•o
c
i
,_
(0
0)
c

,—

£
^^

o

t:
t^ '
I/I
rtj a^
S"~
1_ X
< LLJ
1
C s-

1- fz
o «-
O u_
f 5
«*J
o

o *-

** s
•Z at
2 •-
* 5
to
5 1£
wi "*
^^ ^L
3
O
VI l_
a* at
c -o
u ^u
^3 •^^
O fliE
C t-
— 4-t
^ c
0 "~
•JJ o>
0 w
*• U 0)
oo -o
en u. —
f- 0 U
u- e
£ § »•>
Z ^ 0

« ^3

O ^r—
3 0> >
O f I
OO t— Q.
(0 A

0)
^^
**
5
"5


Oi
o
1_
s*

^J
3

— ,
03
^^

Q.
t—
C
^-n
tn A

^ 00

"0 "~*
'S
3".""1
ffl A
g °^
E ^Ek
9
* >i
"°
jd "^

c a.
"~" e
"O
^J ^
0 M
&• u
5
i/i C
o fl>
Z. f*
^» ^^
•*-> O-
<
§01
JC
1- 4-1

a>
.. ^3
^
**^ ^j
*^* ^
^* O
CL
3

(Q *
> £
Of
0) "0
a; u
f C
1— —
u
-29-
























































•o
Q}
-*-*
^B
O
Q.
a>
L.
_^
0
X
II

oe
z

02/06/89

-------









A
-•* p.
^**O
•*•• J*
U 4)
C >»
O -D
.* ID
e
3 *

^9
Of "O
C X.
•5 9
CVi ** ^
' 5»o

tu «^ "O
SB 5»
S >» e
X *- CL
•^ *• x
U UJ
C irt
Of 4^
o oc
e
•^ ^v
^J Al
^ ^«
'V ^
O IQ
Q
C 1
O Of

^•1 p)
*o TO
<3 CL
^C (A
c
1-4 C







•o
•— 4>
ng u
u c
«- <9
•*- u
— £
•2 §>
t/>
u
I- C
§^1
•o
3 —
J— W
c







0)
CL

u

^»








c
(Q
e>
^
0

•*•*
(U
o>
|w
*fl
H-

o>

*₯
«/« CL
o CL





CO O>
O (— CM
O O r-
o do
V il U
CL CL Q.

o o O
0 O 0
X v^ x^
O CO CO




•o -o
c c

e §
o o
c g c
4>
^ "^ ^
4? {O 01 Q
o e 4> u E
o e o

V U U "O U
>» l_ O >» U
0) >Q X 4> 19
^j O 4) ^^ W








in
rQ
1/1 4) m
4? ^0)
** U •»->
I/I C «/•
0) IQ Of
*• CL *»

-
r
o OS
o
OCM

i 1-
X 4> fC
Of wj O








^
tQ
4) vt
»_ Of
u •**
C m
iq 
o e
o
o oo
co en

r»


r~ r— r- U"l i—
^ O O r- Q
O O 0 i— G
O O O O C
II V V II V
CL CL a. CL a

o o o o a
o o o o c
V. X^ X^ X^ X
O O O r- CT
r— lf> r*



I/I
TJ a T3
C S C
^ O ^
p>v» ^? •••
o> — o
u
§>•!_>
u «— m a i_
o fo f~ o E »c
Cg Of 06
Of S O "9 U E
^ § ug J5 1
 »-» vi CL
C r- 3 m ^ f-
•^ CX t/i U e fS C
U ** O f— C O 4-1

>t 33 O -O 4-t =
Of E •*•" *•-  c
tn U
« "o i >
41 i. «- vi i_

w S i. i-l
C E >• 4) E
CL E -H> a 1

u- u-

o a
a
a
r-






O
O
II
L 0.

S
X,





I/I
1
o
c
1 «-
u
1 w
^ o
u -o
e
b. ro
r*~ i/*
a a
L Wl O E
IMK «^ O
E (—4)

4>* u* (Q







n

t "O

o

•^
5


B
i1
CM
f^K
IM
^
0068d
-30-
06/23/87

-------

































^
,
^ f
^
o
o


C\J
\o

LIJ
1
CD

^^



































^
^-» 4*
T3 U
O C
**"" ^
4-> U
I/I »^

T3 e
4-> O>
co «-
CO




u
to
u
0 0)
E -o
3 —
1— 0
C
^^









a
a
H-

IM.



flMM.











c
'Q
o>
^B
0

4-*
0)
iw
^
^




X
if
CO








^^ fir
to CX
o a.
a —






*»• r—
00 0
i— O

o o
n V
a. a.









o o
0 0
i— r—
^4i ^^
OO











2^»
§ g
o g
<-> S


I/*
 ^#
i/> i_
^ c ^^
& C tJ
"^ § 'oi





L^ ^U


~


^^ ^*^
m n
6 E
V, V.
of o§
0 0
O CM O 00
i— i— oo cn
CM vO
* •
CM r»
-P--
0068d



r^*
O
O

0
V
CL









O .
O
V.
r—
^_







c«
i
c
u
^
I— O

U "O
e
^ 'Q
»0

3 3
u E
i— e
^~ ^
e -o
u_ rQ












•o
O
^_
>»
5























U-
o

»jj
O gj


^ |
Q. *~

&
4->

U*> O
^H

4;
i/i
O
•o

^
3
4-
T3
t/l
^
S ** x
O e trt

L» -p^ ^
*o 25
1/1 > 0

^^ uj j2
fi /•! ^
0 ° *»
i_ ^
4-> 4^' "O
<" «_ a*

m fl^
=9 •**

^~* •»•••
C
x E

l> T3
^^
fl^ tyi
^ TV
1 •«
3
L. "O
O 3
3 O
|
U

<^
£
r—

,.
^>
•o
3
4^
CO

u-
O

4-1
O*
c
&
u
CO
-31-


































*
O)
|M>
3
i/i

Q,
0;

u_
o

to
4^
3
O
i»

*T3
t_
3
^^
rg
C

CL
3
o
o>
^s.
'a
g
w
e
 ^5
T3 to
3 -C

U ro
— l_
4-* C
O ^
C 0)
I/I
to to
O >

.c
4-1
L. 4->
0 O
CL C
&
^ ^t
5
£ O
v h-
^3 flU
3 £
0.1—
C
3

& I/)
£ C
*- 0

7 -"-1

r~
*O ^3
fli ^
£ 0)
i/«
•'^ ^~
i*1^ ^
JQ U
3 «-
CL O>
O
C^^
^^
4U O
^i ^C
£ 4->
^3
4-> CL
O O
C 4-«

fl(J ^J
f
*~
•O 3 OJ
3 ^ ^->
1^1 > 3
*f» Q"
fl^ ^D Q^
£ C -0
(— "~ <


• •
>» ••
•o >>
3 U
-*^ 
0) >
X O















J\
is
to
3
o


^_
0
u-

^3
to
i/i
0
^
X
to

to
3
i/i
O<




u-

•
1/1

fl>
4^
3

f—
f«M
I"
^
O


^g
0)
1^
o
CL
x


to
x
i/i

GO ^9
cn «-

• to
^C ^~
Q. 3
LLJ «g
i
CO O)
3
^3 ^P
* 4 ^^
O> CO
u

3 ^
0 ^
OO Z
rtl -Q


•«
— .
^*
4^"

X
O

£j
,
C/
3
•o
^

t/1
to

CM
LO
A

t.
O
u.

"to
~
3
i/i

CL
3
O

pys
•x
X

l/<
N.
^Nrf
^
t

O
o


4^
13
^

e
o

^^

_,
i/i
i/i


to
^

0 >t

fQ C~~
C (Q

"i^i
G) C'l
c o

•o o

to i/i
(— £
U
to

L




•o
e
to
^
4^

«

C o
P c
•o
b- "^
o w
a- e


^ ^
3 o

1 ^
CL ^_
«
a> >
£ r
t— CL
•o
02/06/89

-------
6.2.2.   Oral.   Pertinent  data regarding  the carclnogenlcHy  of  1,3-buta-
dlene by  the  oral route of  exposure could not  be  located 1n  the  available
literature as  cited In Appendix A.
6.2.3.   Other Relevant  Information.  The  positive carclnogenlclty  studies
In  Sprague-Dawley rats  (Hazleton  Laboratories,  1981a) and  1n  B6C3F1  mice
(Haseman et al.,  1984; Huff et al.,  1985;  NTP,  1984)  reveal that  mice  were
more  sensitive  than   rats   regarding  carcinogenic  response  to  butadiene.
Several Investigators  (Krelllng  et al., 1986a,b; Bond  et al.,  1986)  raised
the  question  of   whether differences  1n  species  metabolism of  1,3-butadlene
might  be  responsible  for   differences  In   species  susceptibility  to  the
carcinogenic  properties  of  1,3-butad1ene.   Mice do  metabolize  1,3-butadlene
faster  than rats  (Krelllng et al.,  1986a,b)  and higher blood  levels  of  the
primary   reactive  metabolite,  1,2-epoxy-3-butene,  have  been   found   In'
butadiene-exposed  mice when compared  with similarly exposed  rats  (Bond  et
al., 1986; Krelllng et al., 1987).
    Differences   In  species metabolism  of   1,3-butadlene  between  Sprague-
Dawley rats and B6C3F1 mice  may only partially explain  the greater sensitiv-
ity of B6C3F1  mice to  the  carcinogenic  properties of 1,3-butadlene following
Inhalation exposure.   Another  possibility  1s  that an endogenous virus  (MuLV)
present In  the  B6C3F1 mouse strain  acted  1n  combination  with  1,3-butad1ene
to  produce  the high  Incidence of  lymphoma present  In  this strain  of  mouse
after 1,3-butadlene exposure.  Studies  are In progress using a mouse  strain
(NIH) which 1s free from the MuLV  virus  to elucidate what role, 1f any,  this
virus plays In  the development of lymphomas  In  1,3-butadlene-exposed  B6C3F1
mice (Irons et al., 1986b).
    The  toxic response  to  1,3-butadlene  consisting of a  butadiene-Induced
macrocytlc-megaloblastlc  anemia   1n  mice  (Irons  et  al., 1986a,b)  may  be
0068d
-32-
10/05/88

-------
considered  a  preneoplastlc response.   This  1,3-butad1ene-1nduced anemia  1n
mice Is considered  to  be similar to human preleukemlc  syndrome  and  may  play
a role  1n butadiene-Induced murlne  thymus  lymphoma/leukemla (Irons et  a!.,
1986a).
6.3.   MUTAGENICITY
    Hutagenlclty data are  summarized 1n Table 6-3.   Apparently metabolism  of
l,3-butad1ene to  a reactive metabolite  1s  required  for  butadiene  to exert
Us  mutagenlc effect  In  certain strains of Salmonella  typhlmurlum (Poncelet
et  al.,   1980;  OeMeester  et  al.,  1980;  Wooder,  1986),  although  positive
results without S-9  activation  were  obtained  In  an  earlier   study  In  S.
typhlmurlum  strain TA1535 at  higher  concentrations.   Similarly,  positive
results 1n  a  forward  mutation  test 1n mouse  lymphoma cells  were obtained  In
the  presence  but  not  the  absence of  S-9  from rats  (Sernau et  al.,  1986).,
Positive  results  were also obtained  1n j£ vivo  mlcronucleus (Choy et  al.,
1986)  and SCE tests  (Cunningham et al., 1986), 1n mouse and rat bone  marrow
cells   and  In  the SCE  test In  rat bone  marrow   cells  (Cunningham et  al.,
1986).   Results  were negative In  In  vivo tests  for unscheduled  DNA synthesis
In  liver  cells  from rats  and mice  (Vincent et  al.,  1986)  and 1n  the  micro-
nucleus test 1n rat bone marrow  cells  (Choy et  al.,  1986;  Cunningham et  al.,
1986).    Recently,   T1ce  et al.   (1987)  reported   Increases  1n  chromosome
aberrations and SCE  (with depressed  mltotlc  activity) 1n  bone  marrow and
Increased  mlcronuclel  formation  In peripheral  blood.  •
6.4.   TERATOGENICITY
    An   Inhalation  teratogenlclty  study of  1,3-butadlene was   performed  by
Hazleton  Laboratories  (1981b).   Female Sprague-Dawley  rats  were  exposed  to
200, 1000 or  8000 ppm (442, 2212  or  17,698  mg/m3) 6 hours/day  on days  6-15
(Inclusive)  of  gestation.   Maternal  toxlclty  In  the  form  of   reduced  body


0068d                                -33-                             10/05/88

-------



























4*
0*

*«
2
3
flQ
i
rt
*
pull*
CO U.
t O
CD -*
«C vi
^B

.*•»
U
I
flO

I




















01
i
k.
4>

O)
oc






e

§
u




01
i
a.
VI
0)
oe


w
- s
•< Ol
 VI
•i- >>
•w t/>
i


e
e

•r* Ol
Concentra
or Dos


S
w
IS
(^

1^
a

?
1
'S*
ffl 6
u «a
e o
*•*

>»
wi

§

Ol "~
VI *
Ol •—
« 'Q

^9! Oi *-
u  >• u •* e CM
o ^ a 2 £ ^
•** > Ol f k.
— i- a- a, o
oi •< a. e ^
C U f U
Ol <0 Ol vi •* O
•^ .O U. •- L.
•o u 01 x

*• C vl — TJ i-
3 01 a i— 01 e
^ o> e <->

o "S — u L. o
ki. B S <*- *^ **


i *



,^
e •«

4> JM ^
91 91 > r— «l
V) W» ^ b» *
' ^i52
O u •*
1. O Ol
<*» k ^
— «t a.


e

u o>
> o u
•N. •* o>
» W A
*3^
K— a
n vi B
oil *

e u
— o
VI «Q
a u
e u

VI VI
 w -» >• u —
c oi u ^ u S
3 !t 'IH

o e *- *-o n>
I- •- O
u. oi e oi
VI 4) C — C
X « u Ol Ol
"5 vi ^ S -a
™ ^ ° 2 -^ 2
1 "B X ^ ^ ?


4 1



_
o c u o •*
O w i«
4> — -O Ol
91 * gQ Ol 91 * ^
1 <^ k ^ 1 -^ 41
A J9 01 * *9
Bo" B S
8 e •* 3 <-
L. Ol Ol U »
— "a a. ~ §




£S£
>^£
*v u a
> b>  r- 4* cfi 0i><"H>a> en 9* &
i r — *- i i — ^i r i u *rf
M t/) *— • fc. »fl V> t/> r~ u »B V) O(Q
f 4> O4l ' *. O4l ' «fi—^
O W -*1* O U •** Q ••*
uoa» L.OOI t. >

e B "" o> u A xi
u o oi k e IQ iv
— e oi w
> " Ol £ IS VI VI
v, n, — a. u 'O •«
> k *O VI U
Mirf 19 Q •"• 01 Of
gs-5 & « I I
oi 3 «•> ai  T3 vi vi

e w e w e w
— o *- o «- o
v «q vi  S n co
*- irf^ *^ O
• 5 5 5
co|>- >- *—
c
4* O
u* *••»
I* •«•*
11
















^B






1 1



_
^ jQ
U^ I.
^> (9
91 91 Ol
(/> «/» O ifl
1 * r- Ol
W t-
e ••
L. 0)
i Q.

0>


VI
i
VI

e u
— o
VI 
H-



0068d
-34-
09/14/87

-------
c
4>
ae


**
1

I
o
a.
VI
41
ac
EX
i!
> VI
— *»
Concentration
or Dose
Application
2-
^
- 3
D.
Kfc
IV C
U i«
c o

VI

to e uo
f- tfj Q3
flU *> '"
£ rJ •— " 3 .* "c
to *Q U IV C IQ k
4> •** O •** 4) -^ «•
O 4> a. 4) «/» 41 >
3°
41 •-
(X »l U
VI 4< C
K w 4i
-0 •• 41
U CJ U U •*-'3tt-U
* * * * 5,e *
4,  —
1 U —
41 a> 15
111

ii ii * i * i
•*• ~* Urn —
^^4il A v
U L. U L. g gC k.
o — o •< 5 u **
— & — e. — «t a.
VI -O
3 4f
Uiht^a^ i^ ^0 41 vi
IOCQ > ioc o 41 > e
.C!<~- O £:•*• viOO Qi
O C Oi u J3 O C 41 O ifl — A X
uO4»k.oiv ueo>ua)iv 4>
^GE41^* .^C4> 4tC
> — 41 £ H) VI >-»4lf ->k,4> vi vi
X.iV«-Q,0 «5 X.IV— a.OV.3— V r-
>k.9viu >k>'Ovi^>i/iIo m
*i*iVQ<^ii «rfmt> ow4f B
X=-gv* S M e -3 g -X a.— 1 •=
3*<4> >V 104)3^ OOK3 ^ C
r**UA(V9 v1 r^UJfiiV eM>^ ^1^3 ^ ^.
XXX
fl% ^ft Qn
§
U vi 41 »•
1 iu I
O > CO CO JT t_

e e e
a* o o» e T3 o
* «s o> w 5 ^S
11 ii Ii i
e* Gh 6™
i— r— fl> r~
J 1 _: f J"
IB u i« e iv
e e
«•* ^ «* 3 **
41 » 41 CJ 4>
0
41 «-
S s
L. "D
e «-
«^ 3

tJ C 3
£!
^ u
1 «-
* 4} E
VI
O C
a —
i *


£ £
14- ~ &
«£ « ^o
0*2 1». §§ s^r
O *» >>
O > -OH)
Vl^^kiO VIVVV
^ O VI ^ 4* X«
SV VI >l IB VI VI fV
4>9t L. nj B e k.
— v» s'o «- ft a k.
C O u- O C X O O
4)Q.O£Pv fO4)£ 6-2 « 4»i^
LJ 3* O X U C >•*
(. JS — l_ ^ <0O4l
n- m <- u. o BBAU
VI
I
u
3
g
k. 
-------
           OJ
           u
          

          « r»
          W 00
                              0> r»
                              u eo
                              c
                              o
                              CL
           o
           CL
e
u
          £..
          u e
           1
o
o
          "B
          U
                             in

                             (Nl
                             (M in
                              > C\l
                   x o   >>   x e   >,
                   Of f »> <9   0)£>ti«
                               O   O
                               a * u-
                             S»
                               §o

                               t
                            u e
                            sO O
        ai

        u
                              ^ vi



                              U
                                                                                                                        f
                                g.
                                cu
                                L.

                               **

                                I

                                u
                                         ft
       Q068d
                                               -36-
01/21/88

-------
weight  gain was observed  at 442  and  2212 mg/m3  and  loss  of  maternal  body
weight  was  observed at  17,698  mg/m3.   A  teratogenlc  effect 1n  the  form of
major  skeletal  and  cardiovascular-thoracic  anomalies was  noted  In fetuses of
dams exposed to 8000 ppm (17,698 mg/m3).
    An  abstract  of  a  Russian  study   (Serebrennlkov  and  Ogleznev,  1978)
Indicated  that  a   4-month   Inhalation  of  1,3-butad1ene   (concentration  not
reported) by  female rats  (strain  not  specified)  caused  embryonal  mortality
and teratogenesls.
6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
    NTP  (1984)  performed  a cancer  study  In  which  groups   of  50  B6C3F1
mice/sex  were  exposed  to  0, 625  or 1250  ppm  (0,  1383  or  2765 mg/m3),  6
hours/day,  5  days/week.   The study  had  to  be terminated after  60-61  weeks
because  of  high cancer-related mortality.   Gonadal  atrophy was  observed 1n-
both sexes 1n both  treated groups.
6.6.   SUMMARY
    The  toxldty of 1,3-butadlene  following  Inhalation   exposure appears to
depend  on  the  species  of  animal.  Adverse  acute  effects  attributable  to
1,3-butadlene  exposure  were practically  nonexistent  except   for  Increased
salivation  In  females  1n  Sprague-Dawley  rats  exposed to 8000  ppm  (17,698
mg/m3),  6 hours/day,  5 days/week  for  13 weeks  (Crouch and  Pulllnger,  1978;
Crouch  et  al.,  1979)  and  In  rabbits  and  dogs exposed  to  6700 mg/m3,  7.5
hours/day, 6 days/week  for  8 months (Carpenter et al.,  1944).   Reduced  body
weight  In rats and male  guinea pigs was  observed at  this  level.  The  bone
marrow appears  to  be  a target  site  for  1,3-butad1ene  toxldty  1n B6C3F1  and
NIH mice  (Irons  et  al.,  1986a,b;  Lelderman et  al.,  1986).  A l,3-butad1ene-
Induced  macrocytlc-megaloblastU  anemia  was observed In  B6C3F1 and NIH  mice
exposed  to  1250 ppm (2765 mg/m3), 6 hours/day, 5-6  days/week  for as  few as


0068d                               -37-                             10/05/88

-------
6 weeks (Irons et al., 1986a,b;  Lelderman  et  al.,  1986).   Chronic  Inhalation
exposure  to  1,3-butadlene at  >625 ppm  (1383 mg/ma),  6  hours/day, 5  days/
week for  60  weeks  caused gonadal atrophy  In  both  sexes of  B6C3F1  mice  (NTP,
1984).   Nonneoplastlc  lesions  of the nasal  cavity of male mice occurred  at
1250 ppm (2765 mg/m3) (NTP, 1984).
    Several ep1dem1olog1cal studies (McMlchael et  al.t  1974;  Andjelkovlch  et
al., 1976; Matanoskl  et  al.,  1982) associate work 1n the  SBR  Industry with
excess   risk  of  cancers   of  the hemotopoletlc  and  lymphatic  systems,  but
concurrent exposure  to potential  carcinogens other  than  1,3-butadlene also
occurred.    Long-term  Inhalation   cardnogenlclty  studies  performed   with
B6C3F1   mice   (NTP,   1984)  and  Sprague-Dawley rats   (Hazleton  Laboratories,
1981a;   Owen  et  al.,  1987)  confirm  that  1,3-butadlene  Is carcinogenic  1n
these  species.   Statistically   significant  (p<0.05)  Increased  Incidences  of
primary   tumors  at   multiple    sites  were   observed  Including   lymphomas,
hemanglosarcomas,  alveolar/bronchlolar   adenomas,   aclnar  cell  carcinomas,
granulosa   cell  tumors  or carcinomas,  forestomach  paplllomas  and  carcinomas,
and hepatocellular adenomas  and carcinomas.   The  most  prevalent  tumor  types
In  B6C3F1  mice  were  lymphomas  associated  with the hematopoletlc  system and
hemanglosarcomas.  Five  other  tumor sites  also had statistically  significant
Increases   (p<0.05)  In this  study, which  had to  be terminated after  60-61
weeks  because of high cancer  mortality.   This mouse strain was found  to  be
far  more   sensitive   In   terms  of a  carcinogenic   response  than  was  the
Sprague-Dawley rat.
    Butadiene 1s mutagenlc  In bacteria only with activation  (DeMeester  et
al., 1980) and  Induces chromosomal  aberrations and SCE  In mice (Tlce et al.,
1987;  Wooden, 1986).   Data from Hazleton  Laboratories  (1981b)  Indicate that
1,3-butadlene  Is  a   teratogen  when  pregnant  female  rats are  exposed  by
Inhalation at 8000 ppm (17,698 mg/m3), 6 hours/day during organogenesls.
0068d
-38-
01/06/89

-------
                     7.   EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
7.1.   HUHAN
    A TLV  of 10  ppm (22 mg/ma) has  been  adopted for 1,3-butadlene  (ACGIH,
1986a),   and  this  compound   has  been  listed  In  Appendix  A2,   Industrial
Substances  Suspect  of Carcinogenic  Potential  for  Han.   This  TLV has  been
adopted   on  the   basis  of positive  Inhalation  carclnogenlcUy studies  with
rats and mice  and observed  teratogenlc  effects  1n rats  (ACGIH, 1986b).   The
OSHA (1985) PEL 1s 1000 ppm (2200  mg/m3).
7.2.   AQUATIC
    Guidelines and  standards  for  the protection of  aquatic organisms  from
the effects  of  1,3-butad1ene  could not be  located  In the  available  litera-
ture as  cited 1n Appendix A.
0068d                               -39-                             09/14/87

-------
                             8.   RISK ASSESSMENT
8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY
8.1.1.   Inhalation.   Two  long-term  Inhalation  cardnogenlclty  studies  of
1,3-butad1ene  have been  conducted.   In   the  NTP  (1984)  study,  mice were
exposed  to  1,3-butad1ene  at  concentrations of 625  (1381  mg/m3) or  1250  ppm
(2763  mg/m3).   The  exposure schedule  was 6  hours/day,   5  days/week.   The
study was  scheduled for 2 years  but  had  to be terminated after 60-61  weeks
because  of  high  cancer  mortality.  Several  tumor  types  1n various  organs
were  observed,  but the two  most  significant  were lymphoma  arising  from  the
hematopoletlc  system  and  hemanglosarcomas.  In general, cancer  response  was
both massive and  rapid.  Male and female  Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to 1000
ppm  (2212  mg/m3)  and 8000  ppm  (17,698  mg/m3)  1,3-butad1ene by  Inhalation
for  6 hours/day,   5 days/week  for  105  or 111  weeks  (Hazleton  Laboratories,'
1981a, subsequently published as  Owen et  al.,  1987) also  developed tumors of
various organs (testes, pancreas,  mammary gland,  thyroid and  uterus-cervix).
8.1.2.   Ingestlon.    Pertinent   data  regarding   the  cardnogenlclty   of
1,3-butad1ene via  Ingestlon  could  not be  located  In the available  literature
as  cited  1n  Appendix A.   However,   because   of  the high  volatility   of
1,3-butadlene and  Us  low  solubility  In water, this  route  1s  not  considered
nearly as Important as the Inhalation  route.
8.1.3.   Other  Routes.   Pertinent data   regarding  the  cardnogenlclty   of
1,3-butadlene  following  exposure   by other than  the  Inhalation  or  Ingestlon
routes  could  not  be  located  In the   available  literature  as  cited   In
Appendix A.
8.1.4.   Weight of Evidence.  Based on the  positive  results from  two  long-
term  Inhalation  cardnogenlclty  studies  (NTP, 1984;   Hazleton  Laboratories,
1981a)  In  two  species  (rats  and  mice)   that  caused multiple  tumor  types,
0068d
-40-
10/05/88

-------
together with  supporting Information about metabolites  having  genotoxk  and
carcinogenic   properties,   and   Inadequate   epldemiological   evidence   for
1,3-butadiene  cardnogeniclty  In  humans,  1,3-butadlene  Is  classified  by  EPA
as Group B2, probable human carcinogen.
8.1.5.   Quantitative Risk Estimates.
    8.1.5.1.   INHALATION — U.S.   EPA  (1985)  derived  q^s  for  1,3-buta-
diene  based  on the  incidence  of   tumors  in   the  NTP  (1984) mouse  study  and
Hazleton  Laboratories   (1981a)   rat  study  using   the  multistage  model.
Separate q,*s  were developed  for  males and  females  of both  species.   From
the  NTP  (1984) study,  tumor  incidences of 2/50,  43/49 and 40/45  were  used
for  male  mice at  0,  625 and  1250 ppm  (0,  1383 and  2765 mg/m3)  and  tumor
incidences of  4/48, 31/48 and  45/49  were  used for female mice exposed to  the
same  concentrations.   These numerators are  the numbers of  animals observed'
at  time  of  death  with  tumor  types  that  both  occurred at a  statistically
Increased  incidence   (hemanglosarcomas,   lymphomas,   lung  and  forestomach
tumors in both sexes,  plus  mammary,  ovarian and liver tumors 1n female mice)
and  also  tumor types  considered  unusual  In  this strain  of mouse  at  60-61
weeks  (preputlal  gland  squamous-cell  carcinomas, brain gllomas and  Zymbal
gland  carcinomas  in male mice).   The  transformed  doses were  calculated  as
Internal or  retained  doses, based  on  an  evaluation  of  then unpublished  NTP
(1985) mouse  absorption data,  which  showed  a substantial  reduction,  1n  the
percent of the inhaled  dose that was  retained,  as the exposure concentration
increased.  Retained  dose  In  the  NTP  (1984)  study was  estimated  from plots
of   log   yg/kg  butadiene  retained   In  animals   vs.  log   ppm   exposure
concentration  In  the  NTP (1985) study  (U.S.  EPA, 1985).   Potency  estimates
were  then  calculated  using a  correction  term  to account  for  the  shortened
experiment time of  60-61  weeks.   Adjusting to  lifetime  exposure resulted  in
a   q.j*   of   6.1X10"1   (mg/kg/day)'1    (Internal    dose)   or   9.2X10'1

0068d                               -41 -                             02/06/89

-------
(ppm)'1  (air  concentration)  based  on  data  from  male  mice,  and  3.0x10"*
(mg/kg/day)"1  (Internal  dose)  or  4.5X10"1  (ppm)"1  based  on  data   from
female mice.  Since  the male  and  female  mouse response was so  similar,  the
results were combined  by  taking as the final  potency  estimate  the geometric
mean  of   6.4XKT1  (ppm)"1.   Assuming humans  breathe  20  mVday,  weigh  70
kg and absorb 54% of  Inhaled  1,3-butad1ene  (at  low exposure  concentrations),
this  q,*  was  expressed  as  1.8  (mg/kg/dayT1  In  terms  of  Internal   dose
(U.S.  EPA,  1985).  The potency estimates  from mouse  studies were  considered
to  be consistent  with the  human  responses;  however, there  were too  many
uncertainties  and gaps  In  the  human  data  base  to make  more  definitive
statement (U.S.  EPA,  1985).
    Subsequent to  the  NTP  (1985)  unpublished  report, the  final  data  were
published (Bond et al., 1986)  and  these published  data contained differences'
In  the low exposure absorption  In the mouse  (but  not In the  rat)  compared
with  the  unpublished   report.   The  main  difference  1s   that   low  exposure
Inhalation  absorption  of  butadiene  In   the  mouse  (and,  by  extrapolation,
humans) Is  now estimated  to be 20% Instead  of 54% (see Section 5.1.).   These
new  figures  lead  to  a   decrease  1n  the   estimated  potency  from  q,*  =
6.4X10""1   (ppm)'1   to   q-j*   =   2.4X10"1   (ppm)'1.   The  details   have
recently  been  presented   (Bayard,  1988;  Cote  and   Bayard,  1988).   These
estimates  supersede  those  of  the  U.S.  EPA  (1985)  document.    The  estimate
based  on  Internal  dose  remains  the  same,  q * =  1.8 (mg/kg/day)'1,  since
the low exposure absorption fraction Is assumed the same for mice and humans.
    U.S.   EPA   (1985)   also   derived   q^s   of    7.0xlO"3    (mg/kg/day)'1
Internal  dose  or   4.2xlO~3   (ppm)"1  from   the  data on  male  rats,  and
9.4xlO"2   (mg/kg/dayr1  Internal   dose   or   5.6xlO~2   (ppm)'1   from  the
data  on  female rats  from the  Hazleton  Laboratories  (1981a)  studies.   U.S.
EPA  (1985)  noted  that  these data  were unpublished  and had not been audited.
0068d
-42-
02/06/89

-------
In addition,  a major  concern  was that  the  individual  animal  data were  not
included In the report.  Subsequently, the data  have  been  published  (Owen et
al.,  1987).   The  published data  in  general  support the unpublished  report.
However, small  differences  In  some Incidence  rates  are apparent.   Because
the primary data are still not  available  for  evaluation  and  because  the  U.S.
EPA  (1985)  analysis  demonstrates   that  a  more  conservative  approach  to
carcinogenic  risk  assessment  is  based on  the NTP  (1984)  mouse data,  this
document  shall  adopt   the  q-j*  of  2.4X10'1  (ppm)"1   from  the U.S.   EPA
(1985) analysis of  the NTP (1984) mouse data  as  the  upper limit  estimate of
incremental carcinogenic potency.
    The concentration of butadiene in  the air  associated with  an  upper  limit
Increased  lifetime  risk of  cancer  at a  risk level  of  1(TS was  calculated
by  dividing   10~5   by  the   q *   of  2.4x10^   (ppm)"1   to   give   a  lower'
limit  concentration   of   4.2xlO~5   ppm  or   9.3xlO~5  mg/m3.    This  lower
limit  concentration (9.3xlO~s  mg/m3)  Is  associated with  a  risk  level  of
1Q~S.   The  lower   limit   concentration  associated  with  a  risk  level  of
ICT*   Is   4.2xlO~6   ppm    or    9.3xlO~6   mg/m3   and   the   concentration
associated with a risk  level  10~7  is 4.2xlO~7 ppm or 9.3xlO~7 mg/m3.
    8.1.5.2.   ORAL —  Based   on  the  NTP   (1984)   Inhalation  study which
showed  1,3-butadiene  to   be  a  potent  carcinogen   at  multiple  sites,   the
assumption  Is  made  that 1,3-butadiene can  also  cause cancer via  the inges-
tion route.  Assuming  100% absorption  from  the gut  (see  Section 5.1.) and an
Inhalation  absorption  at  low  exposures  of  20%,  an upper  limit  incremental
risk  estimate  of q *  = 9.0  (mg/kg/day)"1  is  used.   This  value  supersedes
that of U.S. EPA (1985).
0068d                               -43-                             02/06/89

-------
8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
    Two  animal  studies,  one  using  mice   (NTP,  1984)  and one  using  rats
(Hazleton  Laboratories,  1981a;  Owen   et   al.,   1987),   demonstrated   that
1,3-butadlene  1s  a  carcinogen  following  exposure  by  Inhalation.    Data
regarding  the cardnogen1c1ty  of  1,3-butadlene  following  exposure  by  the
oral  route  could  not  be located  In the  available  literature  as  cited  1n
Appendix A.  In the absence of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  H was  assumed that
1,3-butadlene  Is  potentially  carcinogenic  by  both routes  of  exposure  {oral
and Inhalation);  1n addition,  Insufficient  data  for  RfD derivation  precludes
such a quantitative derivation for systemic toxlclty {RfD).
0068d
-44-
10/05/88

-------
                           9.   REPORTABLE  QUANTITIES
9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
    The  toxldty  of  1,3-butad1ene  was   discussed  In  Chapter  6  and  dose-
response data relevant for consideration  1n  derivation  of  CSs are  summarized
In  Table  9-1.   The studies of  Irons et  al.  (1986a,b)  and Lelderman et  al.
(1986)  were  not  considered   suitable  for  RQ  determination   because  the
responses  1n  these  studies (macrocytlc-megaloblastlc anemia and  alterations
In  stem  cell  development) were  considered  to be preneoplastlc responses  In
l,3-butad1ene-exposed mice.
    The most  severe  effect In Table  9-1  Is  mortality In rats at  an  equiva-
lent human dosage of 340  mg/kg/day.   Another  severe  effect  1s  teratogenlclty
with maternal toxldty  (Hazleton  Laboratories,  1981b).   This effect  occurred
at an equivalent human dose of 483 mg/kg/day.
    The  next  most severe effect was  gonadal atrophy  In  mice (NTP,  1984).
The effect on  reproductive dysfunction  associated with  this atrophy  was  not
studied.   Gonodal  atrophy occurred at  an  equivalent  human  dose  of   24
mg/kg/day  1n females.  Multiplication  of  this dose by 70 kg gives an MED of
1666 mg/day.
    The  least  severe  response,  reduced  body  weight 1n  rats  (Carpenter  et
al., 1944), occurred at  an equivalent human dose of  148 mg/kg/day.   CSs  for
these effects are calculated and presented In Table 9-2.
    The highest CS,  10,  corresponding to  the lowest  RQ  (1000)  1s  associated
with mortality  1n chronically exposed rats  1n the study by Hazleton  Labora-
tories (1981a).  This Is the RQ of choice  and 1t Is  presented In  Table 9-3.
0068d                               -45-                             10/05/88

-------
ox
on
0068d
01
w
4>
41


at





41
e
o
a
«
Of



<-• 41 >i
41 S 13
^™ ^3 *^

uj Z ^—


is?
.2*1.
vi m M
e 8 -v
•5-2 01
£5l






a*
V*
a
M
yj

<£
u
1
•v.
3
a.



f~2-
i*?.?.?
>«*-.


t
"V. tl
x 49
31


•s
vi e
JF

•» 41 C CO
en •»- a> en
4i *~ e o o ""
B < *• 19 •• •
4( ^ 41 L. IB r-
0. <« •— O r~ IQ
i. IM 43 03
<« «* iq i« on *i
0 41 X _I i— 41



^S VI
O>i—
e
>t O
?u
J3 <*- >»
O «->

is |



5 5




oo •»
vO .—
oo o




<-• 41
rj II

Cft V» "B V*
B*G S CO -O Ji
^*. on 4>
oo *« g * S
S-S 5 >ii—
— vce — ««£
Wl O (**
8 «- fc- 6^'
o. a o & v»n
Q. O u- 0. !_ O
O M O O
O kO 4) O J= L.
CO * 4) O O
CM f** 3 ao *e i**



5 5
oc at



w u

0 O


^.
^ §§
£ iS


o i>,
V. C >. 0> 41

4)

W
e o
o *>

4> i- a
r~ O I—
N A CO

fj V*
>,— u ft)
•w c •— — i«
o oi IB • u a
^ o ^ £ u "S
>>•« 41 3 f
— 1> 1/1 4! »-
U ** fc 1.
— u iq m
X - O C r- 4»
o m »^^ a ^
•* *« 3 u •**
O B vi v* <^>
^ i— 4i iq i—
>« •— > «
c — *<«— o 8
^^l^s
•M — «- S »- e
.q ft u_ c 10 43
X X 4) 19 U <0



as




£
s




*
17 *
f*S
VI ^
eS^ci
o -o —
8000 ppm (17.
6 hours/day,
of gestation



^^
ae



^
5^
o



S


w
3 >•
•S. OI4>
VI -0 1—
oc  o
-46-


S S



a. a.
£ S





I I
o o
L. L.
iq (Q

!.* (O >«J<
^ >[ $ ^^ $
a a 10 a. a Z
o o
CM O CM O
^) t^} 1^ .^ ^J ^^

1. U

i i
o e
i T
<^ en
OB 03
en *

T3
C
^-»
vt
•o
X
5*
*w
u
t_
3

^
X •

If

^}
is
ii
^a
25
is
u
s-
a o>
VI c
o ^*
M 2
« >
w •a

_c"^

=•?
Z ^
17
-o 2
o e
*Calcul*<
Inhalati


.
e>

o

*^*
I
1
>>
o
J3

|
4>


*
(4k
41
O
**
e
i
•o
_§

i
e
u
**
o
o
w*
^
«
£
M_
O
o
o
turn
i
u
41
a
01
yt
O
•o
r.
i
'e -~
•O 09
8 £
i2
^ ^U
s ***
t_ *
flj ^^ C
f S
- § s


>> v< 4>
^ *• o>
& 4fi
- 5" o
i J 2
J 1 1
4) a> *•
1 ! s
w * w
»— MB N^
X 1 J



























•








—
SL
to
e
!
£
4)

i
"Si
4>
^5
i_
|
13
<« VI
£ Ol
e >
3

Ol f W
5 3 JS
VI ^ ^
3 Ol O
•O B 4)

1=1
w at
5 3 «
« u- X
02/06/89

-------
















Ol
c
T3
*O
4-1
3

r-"
O

C\J i^
£9% iZ
e
LU O
CO
r- 4->
e
t
Q
CJ
e
o
<•»





















u

c
^
01
u-
O>
oe


O'
ce





01

cc





^
u
0)
LU



•o
ae
e
U LM *"**
4"- ^C ^^
C ^3
o c -o
4= 1 gl
U 3 E
4, .—
O 
u
0>
0.
^ ^
tt> C CO
-- a> en
c o o '""
O 4-> »
4^ ^ • • •
9) t- •
U- «-
U- U
(U *-
X
U 0
•(-» 4^
c
OJ P-
CD flQj
o c
1o 4>
1_ 4->





O

03
CO
co



^^
r*
O






^j
'O
06
^.
*

Q3 (Jj
en 4-> .
«— c •
» "a)
jC 31
0.
e >>
i- -o
4-> O
r~ ^
•o u
c -o
Cj (^
cs ee




*

00 CO
•£> O
*~ *~



^O GO
CM 

Z oe













D
O
**
^^
X
O)
u
c
o

•^
a*
1
X
o
t.
a.
Q.
TS
O
O
p-
u_
O
O
U

u-
4->
e
4->
^
Ol
u
c
c
^B
^3
0)
•o

^
•f^
^
(/t
3
Q>
O
•o
a*
^
r-
OQ68d
-47-
10/05/88

-------
                                                                                  f
                                  TABLE 9-3
                                1,3-BUTADIENE
          Minimum Effective Dose  (MED) and Reportable Quantity (RQ)
Route:
Dose*:
Effect:
Reference:
RVd:
RVe:
Composite Score:
RQ:
Inhalation
24,080 mg/day
mortality
Hazleton Labortorles, 1981a; Owen et al., 1987
1
10
10
1000
^Equivalent human dose
0068d
            -48-
10/05/88

-------
9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY
    Two  long-term  Inhalation  carclnogenlclty  studies  of  1,3-butachene  have
been  performed  (Hazleton  Laboratories,  1981a;  NTP,  1984).   These  studies
were summarized  1n Section 6.2. and  Tables  6-1  and 6-2.   There Is sufficient
evidence from  these two studies to conclude that  1,3-butadlene Is a carcino-
gen  In  animals.   There  Is,  however,  Inadequate  evidence to  demonstrate  or
refute the carcinogenic potential  1n  humans.   Butadiene  Is therefore classi-
fied as  an EPA  Group  B2,  probable  human carcinogen.   The available  animal
data provide a basis  to derive an RQ  based on  carclnogenlclty.   An F  Factor
was  calculated from the geometric  mean of  the  tumor  Incidence  In  male  and
female mice.   The data and derivation  of  the F  factor  are presented In Table
9-4.  Because  the F  factor  Is between  1  and  100,  1,3-butad1ene  1s  placed  In
Potency  Group  2.  An  EPA Group B2 chemical In  Potency Group  2  has  a  MEDIUM
hazard ranking under  CERCLA.   Therefore,  the RQ based on carclnogenlclty  1s
10.
0068d                               -49-                             01/06/89

-------
                                  TABLE 9-4

                       Derivation of Potency Factor  (F)
                               Agent: Butadiene
Reference:
Exposure route:
Species:
Strain:
Sex:
Vehicle or physical
state:
Body weight (average):
Duration of treatment:
Duration of study:
Planned duration of study:
Target organ and tumor
type:
NTP, 1984
Inhalation
mouse
B6C3F1
male
air
0.035 kg
60 weeks
60 weeks
104 weeks
Lung-adenoma/carcinoma
Hematopo1et1c system-
NTP, 1984
Inhalation
mouse
B6C3F1
female
air
0.035 kg
61 weeks
61 weeks
104 weeks
Lung-adenoma/carcinoma
Hematopo1et1c system-
Experimental doses/
exposure:

Transformed doses
(mg/kg/day) Internal:

Tumor Incidence:

Unadjusted 1/EDio:
 (mouse)
                              malignant lymphoma
                            Heart-hemang1osarcoma
                            Forestomach-squamous
                              cell neoplasm
                            Preputlal gland-squamous
                              cell carcinomas
                            Zymbal gland-carcinomas
                            Brain - glloma
0, 625, 1250 ppm
6 hours/day, 5 days/week

0, 17.6. 28.5
2/50, 43/49, 40/45

0.8955 (mg/kg/day)'1
malignant lymphoma
Heart-hemanglosarcoma .
Forestomach-squamous
cell neoplasms liver..
Mammary gland aclner
 cell carcinoma.
Ovary-granulosa cell
tumors
Liver-Hepatocellular
tumors

0, 625, 1250 ppm, 6
hours/day, 5 days/week

0, 17.6, 28.5


4/48, 31/48, 45/49

0.1853 (mg/kg/day)'1
0066d
        -50-
              01/06/89

-------
                              TABLE 9-4 (cont.)
Species extrapolation
factor:
Adjusted factor for
early sacrifice:
Internal to external
12.6
5.21
0.20
12.6
4.96
0.20
dose:

Adjusted 1/ED10
(external) (F factor):

Geometric mean:
11.8 (mg/kg/day)'
2.3 {mg/kg/day)'1
                5.2 (mg/kg/dayr
0068d
        -51-
              01/06/89

-------
                                10.   REFERENCES

ACGIH  (American  Conference of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1986a.
Threshold  Limit  Values  and  Biological  Exposure  Indices  for  1986-1987.
Cincinnati, OH.  p. 40.

ACGIH  (American  Conference of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1986b.
Documentation of the Threshold  Limit  Values  and  Biological  Exposure Indices,
5th ed.  Cincinnati, OH.  p. 68-69.

Amoore, J.E. and £. Hautala.  1983.   Odor  as an  aid to chemical safety:  Odor
thresholds  compared with  threshold  limit  values  and  volatilities for  214
Industrial  chemicals   1n  air and  water  dilution.   J.  'Appl.  Toxlcol.   3:
272-290.

Andjelkovlch, D., J. Taulbeen and H.  Symons.   1976.  Mortality  experience of
a cohort of  rubber  workers, 1964-1973.   J. Occup.  Med.   18: 387-394.   (Cited
In U.S. EPA, 1985)

Arnts, R.R. and S.A. Meeks.  1981.   B1ogen1c  hydrocarbon contribution  to the
ambient air of selected areas.   Atmos. Environ.   15: 1643-1651.

Atkinson, R.   1985.   Kinetics  and  mechanisms  of the gas-phase  reactions of
hydroxyl radical with  organic compounds  under  atmospheric conditions.   Chem.
Rev.  85: 69-201.
0068d
-52-
02/06/89

-------
Atkinson, R. and W.P.L. Carter.   1984.   Kinetics  and  mechanisms  of  gas-phase
reactions  of  ozone  with  organic  compounds   under  atmospheric  conditions.
Chem. Rev.  84: 437-470.

Atkinson, R.  and  J.N.  Pitts,  Jr.   1977.   Absolute  rate  constants for  the
reaction  of  oxygen (3P) atoms  with allene,  1,3-butad1ene  and  vinyl  methyl
ether over the temperature  range 297-439 K.   J. Chem.  Phys.   67:  2492-2495.

Atkinson, R., S.M. Aschmann,  A.M. Winer  and J.N.  PHts,  Jr.   1984.   Kinetics
of  the  gas-phase  reactions  of  No.   3  radicals with  a  series of  dlalkenes,
cycloalkenes and monoterpenes at 295 K.   Environ.  Sc1. Techno!.   18:  370-375.

Bayard,   S.P.   1988.   Pharmacoklnetlcs  In  the  risk  assessment  of  1,3-buta-
dlene.   Presented  at  the  Inst.  Workshop  on   Biological  Data for  Pharmaco-
klnetlc  Modeling and  Risk  Assessment, Ashevllle, NC.   Hay.

Bolt, H.M.,  J.6. Fllser and  F.  Stoermer.   1984.  Inhalation  pharmacoklnetlcs
based on gas  uptake  studies.  V.  Comparative pharmacoklnetlcs  of  ethylene
and l,3-butad1ene In  rats.   Arch.  Toxlcol.   55: 213-218.

Bond, J.A.,  A.R.  Dahl,  R.F.  Henderson,  J.S.  Dutcher,  J.L. Mauderly  and  L.S.
Blrnbaum.    1986.   Species   differences  In   the  disposition   of   Inhaled
butadiene.  Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.  84:  617-627.

Brodztnsky,   R.  and H.B.  Singh.  1982.   Volatile organic  chemicals  1n  the
atmosphere:   An  assessment  of avlalable data.   Atmospheric   Science  Center,
SRI International, Menlo Park, CA.  198 p.    Contract  68-02-3452.


0068d                               -53-                             01/06/89

-------
Carpenter, C.P., C.B. Shaffer, C.S. Well and H.F.  Smyth,  Jr.   1944.   Studies
on the Inhalation of 1:3-butad1ene; with a comparison  of  Us  narcotic  effect
with benzol,  toluol,  and styrene, and  a  note  on the  elimination of  styrene
by the human.  J. Ind.  Hyg.  Toxkol.   26:  69-78.

C&E News  (Chemical and Engineering News).  1986.   Key  Chemicals.  Butadiene.
Chemical and Engineering  News, June 9,  1986.   p.  15.

Checkoway, H. and T.M. Williams.   1982.  A hematology  survey  of workers  at a
styrene-butadlene  synthetic  rubber   manufacturing  plant.    Am.  Ind.   Hyg.
Assoc. J.  43: 164-169.   (Cited In U.S.  EPA,  1985)

Choy, W.N., O.A. Vlachos, M.J. Cunningham, G.T.  Arce and  A.M.  Sarrlf.  1986.
Genotoxlcity of  1,3-butadlene  Induction of bone  marrow mlcronuclel  In  B6C3F1
mice and Sprague-Dawley rats jjn vivo.   Environ.  Mutagen.  8:  18.

CMR  (Chemical  Marketing  Reporter).    1985.   Chemical  Profile.   Butadiene.
Chemical Marketing Reporter, April 11,  1985.

Cote,  I.  and S.P. Bayard.   1988.  EPA's  risk  assessment of  l,3-butad1ene.
Presented  at  the  National  Institute  of  Environmental  Health   Sciences'
International Symposium on 1,3-Butadiene,  Research  Triangle  Park, NC.   April.

Crouch,  C.N.  and D.H.  Pulllnger.  1978.   The  toxlclty of butadiene  to  rats
by Inhalation.  Toxlcol.  Appl. Pharmacol.   45(1): 249-250.
0068d
-54-
02/06/89

-------
Crouch,  C.N.,  D.H.  Pulllnger and  I.F. Gaunt.   1979.   Inhalation  toxlclty
studies  with  1,3-butad1ene -- 2.  3-Month  toxlclty  study  1n rats.   Am.  Ind.
Hyg. Assoc. J.  40: 796-802.

Cunningham,  H.J.,  W.N.  Choy,  G.T.  Arce,  et al.   1986.   Jjn  vivo  slster-
chromatld  exchange and  mlcronucleus  Induction studies with 1,3-butad1ene  In
B6C3F1 mice and Sprague-Dawley rats.   Mutagenesls.   1:  449-452.

Daugherty,  P.M.,  Jr. and  J.T. Garrett.   1951.   Toxlclty  levels of  hydro-
cyanic  acid and some  Industrial  by-products.   Texas  J.  Scl.    3:  391-396.
(Cited In U.S. EPA, 1983)

DeMeester,  C.,  F.  Poncelet, M. Roberfrold  and  M.  Herder.  1978.   Hutagen-
1city  of  butadiene and  butadiene monoxide.   Blochem.  Blophys. Res.  Common.
80{2}: 298-305.

DeMeester,  C.,  F.  Poncelet, M. Roberfrold  and  M.  Herder.  1980.   Mutagen-
Idty  of  butadiene   towards   Salmonella   typhlmurlum.   Toxlcol.   Lett.    6:
125-130.

Oonetskaya, E.I. and F.S.  Schvartsapel.  1970.   Morphological  studies  of  the
organs of  white  rats under the action of 1,3-butadlene In subacute experi-
ments.  Tr. Permsk  Med Inst.  82:  223-225.

Ewlng,  B.B.,  E.S.K.  Chlan,  J.C.  Cook,   C.A.  Evans,   P.K.  Hopke  and  E.G.
Perkins.   1977.  Monitoring to detect  previously unrecognized  pollutants  In
surface waters.  Appendix:  Organic Analysis  Data.   U.S. EPA, Washington,  DC.
p. 75.  EPA 560/6-77-015.  Appendix:  EPA 600/6-77-015A.

0068d    '                           -55-                             01/06/89

-------
Fllser, J.G. and H.H. Bolt.   1984.   Inhalation  pharmacoklnetlcs  based  on  gas
uptake studies.  VI.  Comparative evaluation of ethylene oxide and  butadiene
monoxide  as  exhaled  reactive  metabolites of  ethylene  and 1,3-butad1ene  In
rats.  Arch. Toxlcol.  55: 219-223.

Graedel,  I.E.  1978.  Chemical Compounds  In  the Atmosphere.   Academic  Press,
New York.   p. 76.

Hansch, C.  and  A.3.  Leo.   1981.   Medchem Project.   Issue  No.  19.   Pomona
College,  Claremont, CA.

Haseman,   J.K.,  D.D. Crawford, J.E.  Huff, G.A. Boorman  and  E.E.  HcConnell.
1984.  Results   from  86  two-year  carc1nogen1c1ty studies  conducted  by  the'
NTP.  J.  Toxlcol. Environ. Health.  14:  621-639.

Hawley,  G.G.   1981.    The   Condensed  Chemical  Dictionary,  10th  ed.   Van
Nostrand  Relnhold Co., New York.   p.  156.

Hayano,  S.,   J.H.   Lee,   K.  Furuya  and  T.  Klkuchl.   1985.   Formation   of
hazardous  substances  and  mutagenldty  of  PAH produced during  the  combustion
process 1n a dlesel engine.   Atmos. Environ.   19:  1009-1015.

Hazleton   Laboratories.   1981a.   The  toxldty  and  carc1nogen1c1ty of  buta-
diene  gas  administered  to  rats  by  Inhalation  for  approximately 24 months.
Prepared  for  the International Institute  of Synthetic Rubber  Producers,  New
York, NY.   Unpublished.   (Cited In U.S.  EPA,  1985; Scala,  1981)
0068d
-56-
02/06/89

-------
Hazleton  Laboratories.    1981b.    1,3-8utad1ene   Inhalation   teratogenldty
study  1n the  rat.   Intl.  Inst.  of  Synthetic Rubber.   OTS  8e  submission.
F1che #OTS0505459.  Doc #888200415 (8£hQ-0882-0441).

Mine, J.  and  P.K.  Mookerjee.   1975.  The Intrinsic  hydrophlllc  character  of
organic  compounds.   Correlations  In  terms  of structural  contributions.   J.
Org. Chem.  40: 292-298.

Huff, J.E.,  R.L.  Melnlck, H.A.  Solleveld,  J.K.  Haseman, H.  Powers  and  R.A.
Miller.   1985.   Multiple  organ  cardnogen1c1ty of  1,3-butadlene in  B6C3F1
mice after 60 weeks of Inhalation exposure.   Science.  227: 548-549.

Hughes,  T.W.,  D.R.  Tlerney  and  Z.S.  Khan.   1979.    Measuring  fugitive
emissions from petrochemical  plants.  Chem.  Eng.  Prog.   75: 35-39.

Irons, R.D.,  C.N.  Smith, W.S. Stlllman,  R.S.  Shah,  W.H.  Stlnhagen  and  L.J.
Lelderman.   1986a.   Macrocytlc-megaloblastlc  anemia   1n  male  B6C3F1  mice
following chronic  exposure to  1,3-butadlene.   Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.   83:
95-100.

Irons, R.D.,  C.N.  Smith, W.S. Stlllman,  R.S.  Shah,  W.H.  Stlnhagen  and  L.J.
Lelderman.  1986b.   Macrocytlc-megaloblastlc  anemia 1n  male  NIH  Swiss  mice
following  repeated  exposure  to  1,3-butad1ene.   Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.
85: 450-455.
0068d                               -57-                             01/06/89

-------
Jaber, H.M., W.R.  Mabey,  A.T.  Liu,  T.W. Chou and  H.L.  Johnson.   1984.   Data
acquisition  for   environmental  transport  and  fate  screening.   SRI  Inter-
national, Menlo Park, CA.  p. 105.  EPA  600/6-84-009.   NTIS  PB  84-243906,  P8
84-243955.

Katzman,  H.  and  W.F. Llbby.  1975.   Hydrocarbon  emissions from  jet  engines
operated  at  simulated  high-altitude  supersonic  flight conditions.   Atmos.
Environ.  9: 839-834.

Klrshenbaum, I.   1978.   Butadiene.  IrK  K1rk-0thmer  Encyclopedia  of Chemical
Technology,  3rd  ed., M.  Grayson  and  D. Eckroth,  Ed.   John WHey  and  Sons,
Inc., New York.  p. 313-337.

Krelllng,  R.,  R.J.  Lalb  and  H.M.  Bolt.    1986a.   Alkylatlon  of  nuclear
proteins  and ONA  after  exposure of  rats and  mice  to [1,4-l4C]l,3-butad1ene.
Toxlcol.  Lett.   30: 131-136.

Krelllng,  R.,  R.J.  La1b  and   H.M.  Bolt.    1986b.   Species  differences  In
butadiene metabolism between mice and rats  evaluated by Inhalation pharmaco-
klnetlcs.  Arch.  Toxlcol.  58:  235-238.
          \
Krelllng,  R.,  R.J.  Lalb,  J.G.  Fllser  and  H.M.   Bolt.   198.7.   Inhalation
pharmacoklnetlcs   of  1,2-epoxybutene-3   reveal  species  differences  between
rats and  mice  sensitive  to butadiene-Induced  carclnogenesls.   Arch. Toxlcol.
61: 7-11.
0068d
-58-
01/06/89

-------
Kuz'mln, V.I.   1969.   Pathomorphologlcal  changes In the  lungs  of  white rats
under  the  action  of  1,3-butad1ene and  a-methylstyrene vapors.   Nauch.  Tr.
Omsk. Med. Inst.  88:  215-219.  (CA 75:107749b)

Lelderman, L.J.,  W.S.  Stlllman, R.S.  Shah,  W.H. Stelnhagen and  R.D.  Irons.
1986.   Altered  hematopoletlc  stem  cell  development  in  male B6C3F1  mice
following exposure to 1,3-butadlene.   Exp. Hoi. Pathol.  44: 50-56.

Lonneman,  W.A.,  R.L.   Sella  and  J.J.  Bufallnl.  1978.   Ambient  air  hydro-
carbon concentrations  In Florida.   Environ. Sd. Technol.   12:  459-463.

Lonneman,  W.A.,  G.R.   Namle  and  J.J.   Bufallnl.   1979.   Hydrocarcons  1n
Houston air.   U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.   EPA 600/3-79-018.

Lyman, W.3.,  W.F. Reehl  and D.H. Rosenblatt.   1982.   Handbook  of  Chemical
Property  Estimation  Methods.   McGraw-Hill  Book Co.,  New York.   p.  15-16,
5-4, 5-10, 4-9.

Mabey, W.R.,  J.H. Smith,  R.T.  Podoll, et  al.  1981.  Aquatic  fate  process
data  for  organic  priority pollutants.   Monitoring and  Data Support  Division
(HH  553),  Office  of  Hater Regulations  and Standards,  U.S.  EPA,  Washington,
DC.  p. 28.  EPA 40/4-81-014.

Malvolsln, E.  and M.  Roberfrold.  1982.   Hepatic  mlcrosomal  metabolism  of
l,3-butad1ene.  Xenob1ot1ca.   12(2):  137-144.
0068d                               -59-                             01/06/89

-------
Malvo1s1n, E., G.  Lhoest,  F.  Poncelet,  H. Roberfroid and M.  Herder.   1979.
Identification and  quantHatlon  of  1,2-epoxybutene-3 as the  primary metabo-
lite of 1,3-butadlene.  J.  Chromatogr.   178(2):  419-425.

Malvolsln, E.t  M.  Mercler and  M.  Roberfroid.   1982.   Enzymlc hydratlon  of
butadiene monoxide and  Its  Importance  1n the metabolism of butadiene.   Adv..
Exp. Med. Blol.  136A: 437-444.

Matanoskl, G.M., L.  Schwartz,  J.  Sperrazza  and J. Toriascla.   1982.  Mortal-
ity  of   workers   1n   the  styrene-butadlene   rubber  polymer   manufacturing
Industry.   John  Hopkins  University School  of  Hygiene and  Public Health,
Baltimore, MD.  Unpublished.   (Cited In  U.S.  EPA,  1985)

McAullffe,  C.   1966.   Solubility   In  water  of  paraffin.   Cycloparaffln,
olefln,  acetylene,  cycloolefln  and aromatic  hydrocarbon.    J.  Phys.   Chem.
70: 1267-1275.

McMlchael, A.J., R.  Splrtas  and  L.L. Kupper.  1974.  An epidemlologic  study
of mortality  within  a cohort of  rubber  workers,  1964-1972.   J. Occup.  Med.
16: 458-464.   (CHed 1n U.S.  EPA,  1985)

Melnhardt, T.J., R.A.  Lemen,  M.S.  Crandall  and R.J. Young.   1982.   Environ-
mental epidemlologic  Investigation of the Uyrene-butadlene rubber  Industry.
Scand. J. Work Environ. Health.   8:  250-259.   (CHed In  U.S. EPA, 1985)

Miller, D.F.  and A.J.  Alkezweeny.   1980.  Aerosol formation  In urban  plumes
over Lake Michigan.  Ann. N.Y. Acad.  Scl.  338:  219-232.
0068d
-60-
02/06/89

-------
Molodyuk,  A.V.,  V.V.  Semchenko and  G.  Rlpp.   1969.  Microscopic  changes  1n
the  spleen of experimental  animals  during the  Inhalation  of  1,3-butad1ene.
Nauch. Tr. Omsk. Med. Inst.  88: 170-173.  (CA 75:107773e)

Nellgan,  R.W.    1962.   Hydrocarbons   In  the  Los  Angeles atmosphere.   Arch.
Environ. Health.  5: 581-591.

N1k1, H.,  P.O.  Maker,  C.M. Savage and L.P. Breltenbach.  1983.   Atmospheric
ozone-olefln reactions.  Environ.  Scl. Technol.  17: 312A-322A.

Nlklforova, A.A., 6.  R1pp  and I.I. Taskaev.   1969.  Action  of  1,3-butadlene
on  the  structural  elements  of  kidneys and  heart.  Nauch.  Tr.  Omsk.  Med.
Inst.  88: 166-169.

NIOSH  (National  Institute  for  Occupational  Safety   and   Health).    1984.
1,3-Butadlene.   Current  Intelligence  Bulletin 41.  U.S.  EPA. Health,  Educa-
tion, Welfare, NIOSH, Washington,  DC.  p. 1-18.

NTP  (National  Toxicology  Program).    1984.    Toxicology  and  Cardnogenesls
Studies  of  l,3-8utad1ene   1n  B6C3F1  Mice.   National  Toxicology  Program,
Research  Triangle  Park,   NC.   (Also  published  as Report  No.  NTP-83-071;
NIH/PUB-84-2544)

NTP  (National  Toxicology  Program).   1985.   Quarterly  report  from  Lovelace
Research Institute,  January  1  through March 31,  1985.   Interagency agreement
22-YOI-ES-0092.    (L.  Blrnbaum, NTP  Project  Officer)    (Cited  In U.S.  EPA,
1985)
0068d                               -61 -                             02/06/89

-------
OSHA  (Occupational  Safety and Health  Administration).   1985.  OSHA  Occupa-
tional Standards.  Permissible Exposure Limits.   29 CFR  1910.1000.

Oura,  E.,  N.C.R.   Ralha  and  H.  Suomalalnen.   1967.    Influence  of   some
alcohols  and  narcotics  on  the  adenoslne  phosphates   In  the  liver  of  the
mouse.  Ann. Med. Exp. Blol.  Fenn.   45: 57-62.   (CA 006/001290E)

Owen, P.E., J.R. Glalster, I.F. Gaunt  and  D.H.  Pulllnger.   1987.   Inhalation
toxldty  studies with  1,3-butad1ene.    3.  Two-year  tqxlcty/carclnogenlclty
study in rats.  Ann. Ind.  Hyg. Assoc.  3.  48(5): 407-413.

Perry,  R.H. and D.  Green.   1984.   Perry's  Chemical Handbook.  Physical  and
Chemical Data, 6th ed.  McGraw-Hill Book Co.,  New York.   p.  3-62.

Pokrovskll, V.A. and  R.I.  Volchkova.   1968.  Effect of some  organic  poisons
on blood  formation  processes.  Tr.  Voronezh.  Gos. Med. Inst.   73(4): 61-64.
(CA 74:97300m)

Poncelet,  F., C.  DeMeester,  M. Duverger-van Bogaert, M.  Lambotte-Vandepaer,
M. Roberfrold and  M.  Merder.  1980.   Influence of experimental  factors  on
the mutagenlclty of vlnyllc monomers.   Arch. Toxlcol.   4:  63-66.

Rlpp, G.K.  1969.   Toxlcohyglenlc  characteristics of 1,3-butad1ene.  Nauch.
Tr., Omsk. Med.  Inst.   88: 10-18.   (CA  75:107777j)
R1pp, G.K. and T.M. Lyutlkova.   1966.   Some  hematologlcal  Indexes  In experi-
mental chronic Intoxication with divlnyl and  cracking  gas.   Nauch.  Tr.  Omsk.
Med. Inst.  69: 90-92.
0068d
-62-
01/06/S9

-------
Sandmeyer,  E.E.   1981.   Butadiene.   In:   Patty's   Industrial  Hygiene  and
Toxicology.  John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.  p. 3207-3208.

SANSS  (Structure  and Nomenclature Search System).   1987.   Chemical  Informa-
tion System (CIS) computer data base.  Online.

Sax, N.I.  1984.  Dangerous Properties  of Industrial  Materials,  6th  ed.   Van
Nostrand Relnhold Company, New York.   p. 545.

Scala,  R.A.    1981.   Status  report   on  butadiene  Inhalation study.   Annu.
Meet. Proc. - Int. Inst. Synth. Rubber Prod.  22: I1/1-I1/13.

Schmidt, U. and E.   Loeser.   1985.   Species differences 1n  the  formation of
butadiene monoxide from 1,3-butad1ene.  Arch. ToxUol.  57{4): 222-225.

Schmidt, U. and E. Loeser.  1986.  Epoxldatlon  of  1,3-butadlene 1n liver and
lung  tissue  of  mouse,   rat,  monkey  and  man.   Adv.  Exp.  Med. B1ol.   197:
951-957.

Sella,  R.L.    1979.   Non-urban  hydrocarbon  concentrations  In  ambient  air
north of  Houston, TX.   U.S.  EPA, Research  Triangle Park,  NC.  p.  38.   EPA
600/3-79-010.

Sella,  R.L.,  R.R.   Arnts  and J.W.  Buchanan.   1984.  Atmospheric  volatile
hydrocarbon composition at five  remote  sites  in northwestern North Carolina.
U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.  EPA 600/D-84-092.
0068d                               -63-                             01/06/89

-------
Serebrennlkov,  O.A.  and G.A.  Ogleznev.  1978.   Developmental anomalies  In
the  mother-fetus  system   following   exposure   to   petrochemical   products.
Deposited Doc.  151-2.  {CA 205223A)

Sernau,  R.,  J.  Cavagnaro  and  P.  Kehn.   1986.   1,3-Butadlene  as  an  S-9
activation-dependent  gaseous  positive  control   substance  In  L-5178Y  cell
mutation assays.  Environ.  Mutagen.   8: 75-76.

Shugaev, 8.B.  1969.  Concentrations of  hydrocarbons  In  tissues as  a  measure
of toxlclty.  Arch. Environ. Health.,  18: 878-882.

SRI  (Stanford  Research  Institute).    1986.    1986  Directory  of   Chemical
Producers:  United  States  of America.   SRI International,  Henlo Park,  CA.
p. 514.

Stephens,  E.R.  and  F.R.  Burleson.   1967.   Analysis  of  the  atmosphere  for
light Hydrocarbons.  0.  Air Pollut.  Control  Assoc.  17:  147-153.

Swann, R.L., D.A. Laskowskl, P.J. McCall, K. Vander  Kuy  and H.J.  Dlshburger.
1983.   A .rapid method  for  the  estimation  of  the  environmental  parameters
octanol/water  partition  coefficient,   soil  sorption  constant, water  to  air
ratio and water solubility.  Res. Rev.   85:  23.

Thorn,  N.S.  and A.R.  Agg.    1975.   The  breakdown of  synthetic organic  com-
pounds In biological processes.  Proc.  R. Soc.  Lond. B.   189:  347-357.
0068d
-64-
01/06/89

-------
Thurmond, L.M.,  L.D.  Lauer,  R.V.  House, et a "I.   1986.   Effect  of  short-term
Inhalation exposure  to 1,3-butadlene  on  murlne  Immune  functions.   Toxlcol.
Appl. Pharmacol.  86: 170-179.

Tlce,  R.R.,  R.  Boucher,  C.A.  Luke  and  M.O.   Shelby.   1987.    Comparative
cytogenetic analysis  of bone marrow  damage Induced  In  male B6C3F1 mice  by
multiple exposures to gaseous 1,3-butad1ene.  Environ. Mutagen.   9:  235-250.

U.S. EPA.   1980.   Guidelines and Methodology  for the Preparation  of  Health
Effect  Assessment  Chapters of the  Consent Decree Water  Criteria  Documents.
Federal Register.  45(231): 79347-79357.

U.S. EPA.  1983.  Health and Environmental Effects Profile for l,3-Butad1ene.'
Prepared by the  Office  of  Health  and  Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental
Criteria  and  Assessment  Office,   Cincinnati,   OH  for  the   Office  of  Solid
Waste, Washington, DC.

U.S. EPA.  1984.   Methodology and Guidelines  for Ranking Chemicals  Based  on
Chronic ToxUHy  Data.   Prepared  by  the Office  of Health  and  Environmental
Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,   OH  for  the  Office  of  Solid  Waste  and
Emergency Response, Washington,  DC.

U.S.   EPA.    1985.     Mutagenlclty   and   Carclnogenlclty   Assessment   of
1,3-Butadlene.    Office  of Health  and Environmental  Assessment,  Washington,
DC.  EPA 600/8-85-004F.  NTIS PB  86-125507.
0068d                               -65-                             02/06/89

-------
U.S. EPA.   1986a.   Reference  Values  for Risk  Assessment.   Prepared by  the
Office  of  Health and  Environmental Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria  and
Assessment Office,  Cincinnati, OH for  the Office  of  Solid  Waste,  Washington,
DC.

U.S. EPA.   1986b.   Methodology  for  Evaluating Potential  Cardnogenlclty  In
Support of  Reportable  Quantity  Adjustments  Persuant to CERCLA Section  102.
Prepared  by  the Office  of Health  and Environmental Assessment,  Carcinogen
Assessment  Group for  the  Office  of  Solid  Waste  and  Emergency  Response,
Washington, DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1986c.   Guidelines   for   Carcinogen   Risk  Assessment.   Federal
Register.   51(185):  33992-34003.

U.S. EPA.  1987.  Graphical  Exposure  Modeling System (GEMS).   Fate  of  Atmo-
spheric Pollutants (FAP) computer data systems.   U.S.  EPA,  Research  Triangle
Park, NC.

USITC  (U.S.   International  Trade  Commission).   1986.   Synthetic   Organic
Chemicals.   United  States  Production  and  Sales.   USITC  Publ.  1892,  Wash-
ington, DC.  p. 19,  22.

Vincent,  O.R.,   G.  Theall  Arce   and   A.M.  Sarrlf.   1986.   Genotoxlclty  of
l,3-butad1ene  assessment  by  the unscheduled  DNA synthesis assay In  B6C3F1
mice and Sprague-Dawley rats .In. vivo 'and In vitro.  Environ. Mutagen.  8: 88.
Watklnson,  R.F.  and  H.J.  Somervllle.   1976.   The mlcroblal  utilization  of
butadiene.  Irn Proc. 3rd Int. Blodegradatlon Symp.  p. 35-42.
0068d
-66-
02/06/89

-------
Wooder,  M.F.   1986.   Butadiene  Overview.  Annu.  Meet. Proc.  - Int.  Inst.
Synth. Rubber Prod.  27: 18.
0068d                               -67-                             02/06/89

-------
                                  APPENDIX A

                             LITERATURE SEARCHED



    This  HEED  1s  based  on  data  identified  by  computerized  literature

searches of the following:
         TSCATS
         CASR online (U.S. EPA Chemical Activities Status Report)
         TOXLINE
         TOXBACK 76
         TOXBACK 65
         RTECS
         OHM TADS
         STORET
         SRC Environmental Fate Data Bases
         SANSS
         AQUIRE
         TSCAPP
         NTIS
         Federal Register
These searches were conducted  In  February,  1987.   In  addition,  hand searches

were made of  Chemical  Abstracts  (Collective Indices 5-9), and  the  following

secondary sources should be reviewed:


    ACGIH (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1986.  Documentation  of the  Threshold  Limit Values  and  Biological
   •Exposure Indices, 5th ed.  Cincinnati, OH.

    ACGIH (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1986-1987.  TLVs: Threshold Limit  Values for  Chemical Substances 1n
    the  Work  Environment  adopted by  ACGIH with  Intended Changes  for
    1986-1987.  Cincinnati, OH.  Ill  p.

    Clayton,   G.D.  and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1981.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene and  Toxicology,  3rd  rev.  ed., Vol.  2A.   3ohn  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.   2878 p.

    Clayton,   G.D.  and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1981.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene and  Toxicology,  3rd  rev.  ed., Vol.  28.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.   p. 2879-3816.

    Clayton,   G.D.  and  F.E.  Clayton,  £d.   1982.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene and  Toxicology,  3rd  rev.  ed., Vol.  2C.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.   p. 3817-5112.
0068d
-68-
02/06/89

-------
    Grayson,  M.  and  D. Eckroth,  Ed.   1978-1984.  Kirk-Othmer  Encyclo-
    pedia of  Chemical Technology, 3rd ed.  John  Wiley and  Sons,  NY.   23
    Volumes.

    Hamilton,  A. and H.L. Hardy.  1974.   Industrial Toxicology,  3rd  ed.
    Publishing Sciences Group,  Inc.,  Littleton,  HA.   575  p.

    IARC  (International  Agency  for  Research  on Cancer).   IARC  Mono-
    graphs on   the  Evaluation  of  Carcinogenic  Risk  of  Chemicals   to
    Humans.   WHO, IARC, Lyons,  France.

    Jaber, H.M.,  W.R.  Mabey,  A.T.  L1eu,  T.W.   Chou  and H.L.  Johnson.
    1984.   Data  acquisition   for  environmental  transport   and  fate
    screening for compounds  of Interest  to  the Office  of Solid Waste.
    SRI   International,  Henlo  Park,   CA.   EPA  600/6-84-010.   NTIS
    PB84-243906.

    NTP  (National Toxicology  Program).   1986.    Toxicology Research  and
    Testing  Program.   Chemicals  on   Standard  Protocol.    Management
    Status.

    Ouellette,   R.P.  and  J.A.  King.    1977.    Chemical  Week  Pesticide
    Register.   McGraw-Hill  Book Co.,  NY.

    Sax,  I.N.   1984.   Dangerous  Properties of  Industrial  Materials,  6th
    ed.  Van  Nostrand Relnhold Co.,  NY.

    SRI  (Stanford  Research  Institute).   1986.   Directory of  Chemical
    Producers.   Menlo Park,  CA.

    U.S.  EPA.   1986.  Report  on Status  Report  In  the  Special  Review
    Program,   Registration   Standards   Program  and   the   Data  Call   1n
    Programs.    Registration  Standards  and  the  Data  Call  1n  Programs.
    Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC.

    U.S.  EPA.   1985.   CSB Existing  Chemical  Assessment Tracking System.
    Name  and  CAS Number Ordered  Indexes.  Office of Toxic  Substances,
    Washington, DC.

    USITC  (U.S.  International  Trade   Commission).    1985.    Synthetic
    Organic Chemicals.   U.S.  Production  and Sales,  1984, USITC  Publ.
    1422, Washington, DC.

    Verschueren, K.   1983.   Handbook of  Environmental   Data  on  Organic
    Chemicals, 2nd ed.   Van Nostrand Relnhold Co., NY.

    Wlndholz, M., Ed.  1983.   The Merck  Index,  10th  ed.   Merck and Co.,
    Inc., Rahway, NJ.

    Worthing,  C.R.  and S.B. Walker,  Ed.   1983.  The Pesticide  Manual.
    British Crop Protection Council.  695 p.
0068d                               -69-                             02/06/89

-------
    In addition,  approximately 30  compendia  of  aquatic  toxIcHy data were

reviewed. Including the following:
    Battelle's  Columbus  Laboratories.   1971.   Water  Quality  Criteria
    Data  Book.   Volume  3.   Effects   of  Chemicals   on   Aquatic   Life.
    Selected  Data  from the Literature  through  1968.   Prepared for  the
    U.S. EPA under Contract No.  68-01-0007.   Washington,  DC.

    Johnson,  W.W.  and  M.T. Flnley.   1980.   Handbook  of  Acute  Toxlclty
    of  Chemicals  to  F1sh and  Aquatic  Invertebrates.   Summaries  of
    Toxlclty  Tests  Conducted at  Columbia  National  Fisheries  Research
    Laboratory.   1965-1978.   U.S.  Dept.  Interior,  Fish  and  Wildlife
    Serv. Res. Publ.  137,  Washington,  DC.
    McKee, J.E. and  H.W.  Wolf.   1963.   Water
    Prepared  for   the  Resources  Agency  of
    Quality Control Board.  Publ. No.  3-A.
          Quality Criteria, 2nd ed.
           California,   State  Water
    Plmental, D.  1971.  Ecological Effects  of  Pesticides  on  Non-Target
    Species.  Prepared for  the U.S.  EPA,  Washington,  DC.   PB-269605.

    Schneider, B.A.   1979.  Toxicology Handbook.   Mammalian and  Aquatic
    Data.  Book 1: Toxicology  Data.  Office  of  Pesticide  Programs,  U.S.
    EPA, Washington,  DC.   EPA 540/9-79-003.   NTIS PB  80-196876.
    In addition, the following documents were consulted;.
    Santodonato, J.  1985.  Monograph on  human  exposure  to  chemicals  In
    the workplace:  1,3-butad1ene.  National Cancer Inst.   p. 53.

    U.S. EPA.   1976.   Biological  effects  and  environmental  aspects  of
    l,3-butad1ene.   Office of Toxic Substances,  Washington,  DC.   p.  58.

    U.S. EPA.   1978.   Investigation  of  selected potential  environmental
    contaminants: Butadiene and Us ollgomers.  p. T95.

    U.S. EPA.   1981.   Chemical Hazard  Information Profile  Draft  Report
    1,3-Butadlene.   OTS, Washington,  DC.

    U.S.  EPA.    1983.   Health  and  Environmental Effects  Profile  for
    1,3-Butadlene.   Prepared  by  the  Office of  Health and  Environmental
    Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria and  Assessment   Office,  Cincin-
    nati, OH for the Office of Solid  Waste. Washington,  DC.

    U.S. EPA.   1985.   The air toxics  problem  In the United  States:  An
    analysis of cancer risks  for selected  pollutants.   Office  of  Air
    Quality Planning and Standards,  p. 123.
0068d
-70-
02/06/89

-------























I















a>


^
a.
Q <= h-


•4 •

—• rt
iu
& >>
n
1 O)
0 JC
3|
fM
^j
ti *
0*
a a r-i_


4l
i/i ••»
^ VI
i*
3 I—
•* O.

3 fM»
- 1
o a  «0






^
2 "5 <5

CM a
0^ ||

ee * vi
o * >».—

a a » 01 o
i— i i-» o S m -A




j«^
VI
X
VI

a a g a



4)
3
e at
X ^ tl
LU U k.
C U C VI
o — at o
•M o u o x
•2 Jfe "5 £ "
ifl U O U r~
f ^ k. k. 10
C 3 £ * k.
f^ M Cl U O
VI

w^
00 c 0 GO
91 O «• 9»

4> k. TJ
Q." M 2 S Gk*
o o i— 
'oiS
"X Ot
II
el
«i fM
u LT>
a a %


(U
vs -*
L. VI
-* a

3 i—
21
O O "0 *•






 a S

CO • VI
0 . >,r-
i- e <« • z — c
r s § -
U O k. k.
1» £ 'Q
U C LU U U
— 41 _l
e 91 oa e e
e u o « o o
k. ^ B h-
^E 6 "^ QC ^3 ^9
U O U O 41 41
A k. k. ev vi vi
3 f "fl LU »B  u 
U
e
o
u
1
OJ
c
^
^^
 O
*h» VI

•o  i s
S B
0) •«* —
5 £ 1
VI U
ffl "W **-
^3 v* ^3
4) VI 41
> 0) >
41 X V
o u a
IB .a u

























































•*
•3
1
u.

3
C
*^
11
S
0068d
-71-
02/06/89

-------

-------