EPA/600/8-90/033
                                                    September  1989
\,
              HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS DOCUMENT
                          FOR  BENZYL ALCOHOL

             ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA AND ASSESSMENT OFFICE
            OFFICE OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL  ASSESSMENT
                  OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
                 U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ABENCY
                         CINCINNATI, OH 45268

-------

-------
                                                                                                        I
                                      TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                              (Fltate nod Instructions on the reverse before completing)
    FREPORT NO.
   'EPA/600/8-90/033
                                                           3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
                                                            PB91-213694
   4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

    Health and Environmental Effects Document  for
    Benzyl Alcohol

   7. AUTNOR(S)
                                                              5. REPORT DATE
                                                           «. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
                                                           8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
    . PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                              10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                              117CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
   12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                              13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
    Environmental Criteria  and Assessment Office
    Office of Research and  Development
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
    C incinnati. OH  45268	
                                                           14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE

                                                              EPA/600/22
   IS. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
  I  bO
*
16. ABSTRACT
      Health and Environmental  Effects Documents  (HEEDS)  are prepared for the Office of
 Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER).  This document  series is intended  to
  pport  listings under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) as well  as
   provide health-related limits  and goals for emergency and remedial actions  under
  e  Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and  Liability Act (CERCLA).
 Both published literature and  information obtained from  Agency Program Office  files
 are  evaluated as they pertain  to  potential human health,  aquatic life and environmen-
 tal  effects of hazardous waste constituents.
      Several quantitative estimates are presented provided  sufficient data are
 available.  For systemic toxicants, these include Reference Doses (RfDs) for chronic
 and  subchronic exposures for both the inhalation and oral exposures.  In the case  of
 suspected carcinogens, RfDs may not be estimated.  Instead, a carcinogenic potency
 factor,  or q^*, is provided.   These potency estimates are derived for both oral and
 inhalation exposures where possible.  In addition, unit  risk estimates for air and
 drinking water are presented based on inhalation and oral data, respectively.
 Reportable quantities (RQs) based on both chronic toxicity  and carcinogenicity are
 derived.   The RQ is used to determine the quantity of a  hazardous substance for
 which notification is required in the event of a release as specified under CERCLA.
   17.
                                   KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                     DESCRIPTORS
                                                 b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                                                         c. COSATI Field/Group
      ptSTRIBUTtON STATEMENT
    'Public
                                              19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report/
                                                Unclassified 	
21. NO. OF PAGES
   105
                                                 20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                                                   Unclassified
                                                                            22. PRICE
   EPA Fora 2220-1 (R*v. 4-77)   PMKVIOUI COITION i* OBCOLETE

-------
                              ORD CLEARANCE FORM
1. EPA Report No 2. Series 3 Lab/Office Draft No 4. Co
EPA/600/8 ECAO-Cin-G075 . D v
SA. Original Document Title:
Health and Environmental Effects Document for Benzyl Alcohol
>B Final Document Title, if changed:
i. Authors), Affiliation, and Address (identify
EPA authors with Lab/Office)
10 OU/Obj./PPA/Project/Deliverable Output No.
D109 Y105
11. Technical Information (Program) Manager
Signature^- Dafe
Signature of sender (if other than TI(P|M) DatetoCERI
insfe ^wp*==^iLi
(jpcumtfnf manager *f * / /
^L/,//^,7, „„,.,
Branrp [Jiipf/
,r-i-rX.X^,

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

    This  document  has been  reviewed 1n  accordance with  the U.S.  Environ-
mental  Protection  Agency's   peer  and  administrative  review  policies  and
approved  for  publication.   Mention  of  trade names  or commercial  products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for  use.
                                      11

-------

-------
                                    PREFACE
    Health  and  Environmental  Effects Documents (HEEDs) are  prepared  for the
Office of  Solid Waste and Emergency Response  (OSWER).  This document series
Is  Intended  to  support  listings  under  the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act  (RCRA)  as well as  to provide health-related  limits and goals  for emer-
gency  and  remedial actions  under  the  Comprehensive  Environmental  Response,
Compensation  and  Liability   Act  (CERCLA).   Both  published literature  and
Information  obtained  for  Agency Program  Office  files are evaluated  as  they
pertain to  potential  human health,  aquatic  life  and environmental effects of
hazardous  waste constituents.  Ihe literature searched for  1n  this document
and  the  dates  searched  are  Included  In "Appendix:  Literature  Searched."
Literature  search  material  Is current  up to 8 months previous  to  the final
draft  date  listed  on  the  front  cover.   Final  draft document  dates (front
cover) reflect  the date the document Is sent to the Program  Officer (OSMER).

    Several  quantitative  estimates  are  presented provided  sufficient  data
are  available.   For  systemic   toxicants,   these  Include:  Reference  doses
(RfDs) for  chronic  and  subchronlc  exposures  for  both the  Inhalation and oral
exposures.   The subchronlc  or  partial  lifetime  RfD, Is  an estimate  of  an
exposure  level  which  would   not  be expected  to  cause adverse  effects  when
exposure occurs during a limited  time  Interval   I.e., for an Interval which
does  not  constitute  a  significant  portion  of the Hfespan.  This  type  of
exposure estimate  has  not  been  extensively  used,  or rigorously  defined  as
previous risk assessment  efforts  have  focused primarily  on  lifetime exposure
scenarios.   Animal  data  used  for  subchronlc  estimates  generally  reflect
exposure  durations of  30-90 days.  The  general   methodology  for estimating
subchronlc  RfDs  1s  the  same  as  traditionally employed for  chronic estimates,
except that  subchronlc  data are utilized when available.

    In the case of suspected carcinogens, RfDs are not  estimated.   Instead,
a   carcinogenic  potency  factor,   or  q-j*  (U.S.   EPA,  1980a)  1s  provided.
These  potency estimates are  derived  for  both oral  and  Inhalation exposures
where  possible.  In  addition, unit  risk estimates for air  and drinking water
.are presented based on  Inhalation and oral data, respectively.

    Reportable  quantities  (RQs)  based  on  both chronic  toxldty and carclno-
genldty  are  derived.    The RQ  Is  used  to determine  the  quantity  of  a
hazardous  substance  for  which  notification  Is  required  1n the event  of  a
release  as  specified  under   the   Comprehensive  Environmental  Response,
Compensation and  Liability  Act  (CERCLA).   These two RQs  (chronic toxldty
and carclnogenlclty) represent  two of  six  scores  developed  (the remaining
four  reflect IgnHabllity,  reactivity,  aquatic toxldty,  and acute mammalian
toxlclty).   Chemical-specific RQs  reflect  the  lowest  of  these  six  primary
criteria.   The methodology  for  chronic  toxldty and cancer  based  RQs are
defined 1n  U.S. EPA,  1984 and 1986a, respectively.
                                      111

-------
                              EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    Benzyl alcohol  Is  a colorless  liquid with  a  mild aromatic odor  (Rlngk
and Thelmer, 1981).  It  Is  soluble In most organic  solvents  such  as  chloro-
form, ether, glycerol  and  alcohol, and  Is  moderately soluble  In  water  (Sax
and  Lewis,  1987).   Benzyl  alcohol  Is usually  produced  commercially by  the
catalytic hydrolysis of  benzyl  chloride,  although reduction  of  benzole  add
or  benzole  acid  derivatives  Is  also feasible  (Rlngk and  Thelmer,  1979).
Chemical  Dynamics  Corporation,   ICI  Amerlcal   Holdings  Inc.  (Agricultural
Products  Group)  and  Kalama   Chemical   Inc.   currently  manufacture  benzyl
alcohol  (SRI, 1988; USITC 1987, 1988); a  large  proportion Is  used  1n flavor-
Ings and  fragrances (SRI, 1988).   Benzyl  alcohol  1s  also  used In development
of  color  photographic  film,  as a  solvent for dyestuffs.  Inks  and cosmetics
and  1n  the preservation of  parenteral  drugs  and  medical syrups,  ointments
and aerosols (Rlngk and Thelmer, 1979; Sax and Lewis, 1987).
    In the atmosphere, benzyl alcohol probably  exists  almost  entirely In the
vapor phase  (Elsenrelch et al.,  1981).   Apparently,  the  gas-phase  reaction
with photochemically  produced hydroxyl radicals 1s the  primary atmospheric
degradation pathway (half-life  of  -2  days)  (Atkinson,  1985).   Wet  deposition
may also  occur.  The reactions  both with  ozone  and with direct photochemical
degradation are not expected to be Important fate processes.
    In  water,  the dominant fate  process  Is  probably  mlcroblal  degradation.
Benzyl  alcohol  rapidly degraded 1n water  under aerobic  (Belly  and  Goodhue,
1976; Dore et al.. 1975; Shelton  and  Tledje,  1984; Urano  and Kato, 1986) and
anaerobic  (Balba  et  al.,  1981;  Horowitz  et  al.,  1982)  conditions In  the
laboratory.   Photolysis,  hydrolysis,  volatilization  to  the atmosphere  and
                                      1v

-------
chemical  oxidation  are  all expected to be  slow processes In water.  Adsorp-
tion  to  sediment  and  suspended  organic  matter,  as well as bloaccumulatlon 1n
fish  and  aquatic organisms, are probably not Important fate processes.
    Benzyl  alcohol  occurs  naturally In  some   foods  (Coleman et  al.,  1981;
Oumont and  Adda,  1978;  Ho et  al.,  1983; K1nl1n et al., 1972; Takeoka et al.,
1988}.   It  1s also  a man-made  compound used  predominantly In flavorings and
fragrances,  household  remedies  and other  common household  products (Rlngk
and Thelmer,  1979;  Sax and Lewis,  1987).   Although quantitative Information
Is  lacking,  available  data  suggest  that  the  general   population  may  be
exposed  to  benzyl alcohol primarily by Inhalation.   Exposure can also occur
by  Ingestlon and dermal  contact  during the use  of products 1n  which  1t 1s
contained.
    Benzyl  alcohol  can be  released  to  the environment by various pathways.
Primary  sources of  release  Include wastewater emissions from  Us manufac-
ture,  formulation and use In  commercial  products  (Dagon,  1973; Keith, 1976),
effluent  from sewage treatment  plants  (Ellis  et al.,  1982;  Gossett  et al.,
1983)  and landfill  leaching  (Albalges  et al.,  1986;  Harmsen, 1983).   Benzyl
alcohol  was detected  In  Incinerator emissions and exhaust  of  gasoline and
«
dlesel engines  (Hampton et al., 1982; Mulawa and Cadle,  1981; Selzlnger and
D1m1tr1ades,  1972;  James  et al., 1984).
    Benzyl  alcohol   was  considerably  more  toxic  to  bluegllls  (LC5Q   =  10
mg/J.)  and  tidewater  sllversldes  (LC5Q  =  15  mg/a)  In   a  study  by Dawson
et  al.   (1977)  than  It  was   to fathead  minnows  (LC5{J   =,  460  mg/ft)   In  a
study by Mattson et  al.  (1976).  These differences  may  be  species-related,
but  the   fact  that  two low values  were reported  1n one  study  and one high
value was  reported  1n  another  study  suggests  that differences  In  experi-
mental  procedures  between studies  could  have  affected  the  results.   An

-------
LC50  of  646  mg/t  was  reported  1n  golden  orfe  (Kn1e et  al.,  1983),  but
lack  of  details  prevented  assessment  of   this   study.   No   effects  were
reported  In  larval  sea  lamprey (Applegate et  al.,  1957),  blueglll, goldfish
or  trout (Hollls  and  Lennon,  1954;  Wood,  1954)  acutely  exposed  to  5 mg/Ji
of  benzyl alcohol  1n  screening-type studies.  Among  Invertebrates,  an EC5Q
of  400 mg/a.  was reported  for Daphnla  Immobilization (Knle et al.,  1983),
and   LDgQ  values   of   105-160   l/hectare   were  reported   1n  mosqultos
(Slnnlah.  1983).  Among  algae,  the  EC™ value for effects  on photosynthe-
sis  and  nltrogenase activity  exceeded 100 nig/8.  In all  five species  tested
(Stratton and  Corke,  1982).   The  EC5Q  for  reduced   growth was  2600 mg/l
1n  one species  (Knle  et al.,  1983).   Effects In  bacteria were reported at
concentrations  ranging  from  71.4-5083 mg/l  (Kaiser  et  al., 1987; Knle et
al.,  1983; Valshnav,  1986).   In studies  of  terrestrial  organisms  1t  was
found  that  131  mg/l of  benzyl alcohol Inhibited  spore germination 1n fungi
(Wilson  et al.,  1987)  and  that  LD5_  values  were  100  mg/kg bw  or  more In
two  species of  birds (Schafer  et  al.,  1983).
     No  data were found  regarding  the extent and rate  of absorption of benzyl
alcohol   from  Inhalation  exposures.   Benzyl   alcohol  has been  shown  to be
*
rapidly  absorbed from orally administered doses In rabbits (D1ack and Lewis,
1928;  Bray  et al., 1951, 1958) and  man (Snapper  et al., 1924).  An 1n vitro
study  of  percutaneous  penetration  of 14C-benzyl  alcohol  Indicated  that  a
major  portion   of  the  compound   remained  1n  the  stratum  corneum  of  the
epidermal layer  of  human  skin.
     No   Information  was  found   regarding  distribution  of  benzyl  alcohol
following Inhalation or  oral  exposures.   In  dogs, the calculated apparent
volume  of  distribution   suggested  that  the  major  portion  of   Intravenously
administered  benzyl alcohol was  distributed  In the tissues  (Klmura et al.,
1971).
                                       vl

-------
    Metabolism  of benzyl  alcohol  Involves  rapid  oxidation to  benzole  add
 using  a benzaldehyde  Intermediate.   Benzole add 1s  further  metabolized to
 hlppuMc  add,  which 1s excreted In  the  urine  1n  both animals and man (Bray
 et  al., 1951. 1958;  D1ack  and Lewis, 1928; Stekol,  1939;  HcCloskey  et  al.,
 1986;  Snapper et al.,  1924).   Ring  labeled 14C-benzyl alcohol  was  shown to
 form  14C-phenol   In  guinea pig  liver mlcrosomes  where  there  was  no mlcro-
 somal metabolism  of  benzole add (Sloane, 1965).
    In  humans,  the  Immature  Hver  and  kidney  of preterm  Infants  appear to
 have  a  reduced  capacity to metabolize benzyl alcohol  by  glyclne conjugation
 (LeBel  et  al.,  1988).   No  differences  were  detected  In the pattern  of
 metabolism,between  adult  and neonatal mice  (McCloskey et  al., 1986).  Small
 Increases  In  the  dose resulted In  disproportionate plasma levels, Indicating
 that  benzyl alcohol  was eliminated by saturable kinetics.
    In  soil,  benzyl  alcohol   displays  high  mobility and readily  leaches
 through soil  {Brlggs, 1981;  Southworth  and  Keller,  1986;  Swann   et  al.,
 1983).   H1crob1al degradation  In  soil  may  occur; however, conclusive  data
 were  not  located 1n the available literature.  Volatilization from dry  soil
 to  the  atmosphere may be an  Important fate  process;  however.  It Is probably
*
 not an  Important  process 1n wet soils.
    No  Information  was located regarding  the subchronlc  or chronic exposure
 to  benzyl  alcohol   by  Inhalation.    Systemic effects from  a  16-day  gavage
 study  using male and female F344/N rats  and B6C3F1 mice  at doses of  0,  125,
 250,  500,  1000  and  2000 mg/kg given  5 days/week Included  Increased mortality
 and  lethargy In  both  spedes  at  doses  >1000 mg/kg,  mean body  weights  18%
 lower  than controls  1n male  rats  receiving 1000  mg/kg,  unusual  bleeding 1n
 male  rats  and mice  at  >1000 mg/kg, and  rough hair coats  In male rats at  the
 500 and 1000 mg/kg  level, 1n  female  rats  at the  250  and  500 mg/kg level. In
                                      vll

-------
male mice  at  >500 mg/kg and In  female  mice at >1000 mg/kg  (NTP,  1988).   No
hlstopathologlcal effects attributable  to  treatment  were  noted 1n  either  sex
of either  species.   Effects  on rats and mice  from 91-day treatment at doses
of 0.  50,  100,  200,  400 and 800 mg/kg  given 5  days/week  were similar to  the
shorter-term  experiment.   There  was   Increased   mortality   at  the  highest
dosage In male rats  and  female mice (and possibly female rats); other deaths
were  attributed  to  the  gavage  procedure.   Signs of neurotoxldty followed
dosing at  the 800 mg/kg level  In  rats  and mice,  but this was considered an
acute  effect.   Mean body  weights  of the  highest dosage rats of  both sexes
and  the  female mice  receiving >400 mg/kg  were  slightly lower than controls.
Hale  rats  at  the 800 mg/kg level  exhibited  hlstopathologlcal effects of  the
hippocampus,  thymus,  kidney,   skeletal  muscle,  as well as  unusual bleeding;
females  rats  at this  dose also  showed  necrosis  of  the  hippocampus.   No
hlstopathologlcal effects attributable to treatment were seen  In the mice.
    Chronic  oral  studies   consisted  of  the  NTP-sponsored   103-week  gavage
studies  using rats  and  mice   (NTP,  1988),  and a  developmental  toxlclty  and
reproduction  study  using mice  by Nazelden  (1983).   In  the NTP (1988) study,
rats  and mice of both sexes were given  doses of  0,  200 and  400 mg/kg and 0,
100  and  200  mg/kg,  respectively,  administered   5  days/week  for 2  years.
Survival  of the  female  rats at both dose levels was significantly lower than
that  of  vehicle  controls.   However, many  of  the  deaths  were judged  to be
gavage-related,   and  not   compound-related.     The  higher   Incidence   of
accidental  death In  the dosed  animals  1s likely  a result  of  the combined
effect  of the gavage  procedure simultaneous with the neurotoxlc  effect of
the  compound.   High-dose  male  rats  had  a higher  Incidence  of  epithelial
hyperplasla of  the  forestomach,  and a  squatnous  cell papHloma was  seen In
one  male rat  In  the high- and  low-dose  groups.   In female mice, survival 1n
                                     V111

-------
the high-dose group was significantly higher  than  In  controls  after the 74th
week.   Survival  was  not  different  between  other   groups  of  either  sex.
Although mice  were treated  with  lower  doses  of  benzyl alcohol,  they  stm
appear to be the  less sensitive  species,  since there  were no lexicologically
significant effects even  at the  200  mg/kg dose,  which  did  produce systemic
effects In the rats.
    In acute  studies,  rats  died  within 14  days  after  exposure to  1000 ppm
(4422  mg/m3)  of  benzyl  alcohol   for  8  hours  (Smyth  et al.,  1951).   Single
oral  dose  LD5Qs   In  animals  range  from  -1000-2000  mg/kg  (Jenner et  al.,
1964;  Graham and  Kulzenga,  1945).  The average survival  time  of  cats  was 22
hours  from one  20 ml application  of  100% benzyl alcohol  to their  shaved
backs  (Graham  and  Kulzenga,  1945).   Cats  have  a pronounced  sensitivity to
drugs  containing   benzene rings  that 1s  due,  In  part,  to a  relative  defi-
ciency 1n  their  ability  to detoxify  xenoblotlcs  by glucuronlc acid conjuga-
tion   (Wllcke,   1984).   An  acute  dermal   LD5Q of  <5.0  ma/kg was  reported
for  guinea pigs  (Jones,  1967).   Benzyl  alcohol  has  been reported  to  cause
severe eye  problems following Us use  In  ocular  surgery (Grant,  1974), some
dermal  Irritation  to  rabbits  and  humans   (Motoyosh!  et al.,  1979),  hyper-
*
sensitivity  reactions  (Grant  et  al.,  198?; Shmunes,  1984;  Wilson et  al.,
1986)  and   contact  allergies  1n   humans  (Fisher,   1975;   Edwards,   1981;
Lazzarlnl,  1982;  Shojl, 1983;  Van Joost et al., 1985).
    A  higher  Incidence of  preterm Infant  mortality resulted from Intravascu-
lar and  Intramuscular administration  of drugs  containing benzyl alcohol as a
preservative, so  that dosages  averaged  191 mg/kg/day  (Brown et al., 1982).
    No  Information  was  found   regarding   carclnogenlclty  from  Inhalation
exposure  to benzyl alcohol.  A 2-year  gavage  study  using rats and mice with
doses  of 0, 200  and  400  mg/kg,  and 0, 100  and  200 mg/kg, respectively, was
negative  for carclnogenlclty under the  conditions of  the study  (NTP, 1988).

                                      Ix

-------
    Benzyl alcohol  was  negative  1n  reverse mutation assays  with S.  typhl-
murlum. with  and without metabolic  activating  systems,  (Mortelmans et  al.,
1986;  Florin  et  al.,  1980; Rogan et  al..  1986;  Ishldate et al.,  1984),  and
1n tests with E_. coll WP2  uvrA,  but  1t  caused  DNA damage 1n a  rec assay with
B. subtmis  (Kuroda et al., 1984; Yoo,  1986).   It  was  negative In an  micro-
nucleus test  1n  ddY mice  (Hayashl et al., 1988),  In mammalian  cell culture
(Ishldate  et  al.,   1988),  and  did not  Induce  DNA  damage  1n human  alveolar
cells  (Waters et al.,  1982).    In  the  mouse  L5178Y/tk*X~ lymphoma forward
mutation assay, results were equivocal (McGregor  et al.,  1988).
    In a  reproductive and  developmental  toxlclty  study,  gavaged  doses  of 750
mg/kg/day  given  to  pregnant mice for  gestation  days 7-14  resulted  1n lower
mean  Utter and  pup weights,  and signs  of  maternal  toxlclty  Including lower
mean  body weights   and  Increased mortality (Hazelden,  1983;  Hardln et  al.,
1987).
    As data  regarding  the subchronlc and  chronic  toxlclty  and  carclnogenlc-
1ty  of Inhalation exposure to  benzyl alcohol were  not available,  It was not
possible  to  derive RfDs  or  q*s for   this route  of  exposure.  There  was
equivocal  evidence  of  carclnogenldty  In  mice  exposed  to  benzyl  alcohol  by
gavage for 2 years.  Therefore,  benzyl  alcohol  was classified  In Group  D -
not  classifiable as to human carclnogenldty.   A subchronlc oral  RfD  of 1.0
mg/kg/day  was derived  based on  the  NOAEL  of 200  mg/kg, 5 days/week  for  13
weeks  in   the NTP  (1988)  subchronlc   rat study.   A  chronic  oral  RfO  of  0.3
mg/kg/day  was derived  based  on  the LOAEL of  200  mg/kg  5 days/week   for  2
years  In  the  NTP (1988)  study.   An RQ of 1000  was derived, also based  on the
LOAEL  of  200  mg/kg  5 days/week In the NTP  (1988) chronic study.

-------
                             TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                                       Page
1.  INTRODUCTION	     1

    1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER	     1
    1.2.   CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 	     1
    1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA	     2
    1.4.   USE DATA	     2
    1.5.   SUMMARY	     3

2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT	     4

    2.1.   AIR	     4

           2.1.1.   Reaction With Hydroxyl Radicals 	     4
           2.1.2.   Reaction WHh Ozone	     4
           2.1.3.   Physical Removal Processes	     4
           2.1.4.   Photolysis	     4

    2.2.   HATER.	     4

           2.2.1.   Hydrolysis	     4
           2.2.2.   Oxidation 	     4
           2.2.3.   Photolysis	     5
           2.2.4.   Mlcroblal Degradation 	     5
           2.2.5.   B1oconcentrat1on	     6
           2.2.6.   Adsorption	     6
           2.2.7.   Volatilization	     6

    2.3.   SOIL	     6

           2.3.1.   Mlcroblal Degradation 	     6
           2.3.2.   Adsorption/Leaching 	     7
           2.3.3.   Volatilization	     7

    2.4.   SUMMARY	     7

3.  EXPOSURE	     8

    3.1.   HATER	     8
    3.2.   FOOD	     8
    3.3.   INHALATION	     9
    3.4.   DERMAL	     9
    3.5.   OTHER	     9
    3.6.   SUMMARY	     9
                                     X1

-------
                         TABLE OF CONTENTS  (cont.)
4.  ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY	    11

    4.1.   AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY 	    11

           4.1.1.   Acute Toxic  Effects on Fauna	    11
           4.1.2.   Chronic Effects on Fauna	    12
           4.1.3.   Effects on Flora	    13
           4.1,4.   Effects on Bacteria 	    13

    4.2.   TERRESTRIAL TOXICOLOGY	    14

           4.2.1.   Effects on Fauna	    14
           4.2.2.   Effects on Flora	    14

    4.3.   FIELD STUDIES	    14
    4.4.   AQUATIC RISK ASSESSMENT	    14
    4.5.   SUMMARY	    16

5.  PHARMACOKINETCS	    19

    5.1.   ABSORPTION	    19
    5.2.   DISTRIBUTION	    20
    5.3.   METABOLISM	    20
    5.4.   EXCRETION.	    23
    5.5.   SUMMARY	    24

6.  EFFECTS	    26

    6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	    26

           6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposure 	    26
           6.1.2.   Oral Exposure	    26
           6.1.3.   Other Relevant Information	    30

    6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY	    34

           6.2.1.   Inhalation	    34
           6.2.2.   Oral	    34
           6.2.3.   Other Relevant Information	    35

    6.3.   MU1AGENICITY	    35
    6.4.   DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY 	    37
    6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS 	    37
    6.6.   SUMMARY	    39

7.  EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS 	    42

    7.1.   HUMAN	    42
    7.2.   AQUATIC	    42

-------
                          TABLE OF CONTENTS  (cont.)

                                                                        Page
 8.  RISK ASSESSMENT	    43

     8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY	    43

            8.1.1.   Inhalation	    43
            8.1.2.   Oral	    43
            8.1.3.   Other  Routes	    43
            8.1.4.   Weight of Evidence	    43
            8.1.5.   Quantitative Risk Estimates  .  .  .	    43

     8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXIC1TY	    44

            8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure 	    44
            8.2.2.   Oral  Exposure	    44

 9.  REPORTABLE QUANTITIES  	    47

     9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC 70X1C11Y 	    47
     9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY	    49

10.  REFERENCES	    52

APPENDIX A: LITERATURE SEARCHED	    70
APPENDIX B: SUMMARY TABLE  FOR BENZYL ALCOHOL 	    73
APPENDIX C: DOSE/DURATION  RESPONSE GRAPH(S)  FOR EXPOSURE  TO
            BENZYL ALCOHOL  	    74
                                     xin

-------
                               LIST OF TABLES
No.                               Title                                Page
9-1     Oral Toxlclty for Benzyl Alcohol	   48
9-2     Composite Scores for Orally Administered Benzyl Alcohol ...   50
9-3     Benzyl Alcohol: Hlnlmum Effective Dose (MED) and
        Reportable Quantity (RQ)	   51
                                     x1v

-------
                             LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
BCF
bw
CAS
CS
ONA
EEG
61
GMAV
GHCV
HPLC
K
Koc
Kow
 LD50
 LOAEL
 MED
 MNPCE
 MTO
.NOAEL
 PCE
 ppm
 RfD
 RQ
 SPF
 THOD
 v/v
Bloconcentratlon factor
Body weight
Chemical Abstract Service
Composite score
Deoxyrlbonuclelc acid
Electroencephalogram
Concentration effective to SOX of recipients
(and all other subscripted concentration levels)
Gastrointestinal
Genus mean acute value
Genus mean chronic value
High-performance liquid chromatography
Partition coefficient
So1l/sorpt1on coefficient
Octanol/water partition coefficient
Concentration lethal to 5054 of recipients
(and all other subscripted concentration levels)
Dose lethal to 50% of recipients
Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level
Minimum effective dose
NUronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes
Maximum tolerated dose
No-observed-adverse-effect level
Polychromatic erythrocytes
Parts' per million
Reference dose
Reportable quantity
Specific pathogen free
Theoretical oxygen demand
Volume per volume
                                      xv

-------

-------
                               1.   INTRODUCTION
1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER
    Benzyl alcohol  1s  also  known  as  a-hydroxy  toluene,  benzene methanol,
phenylcarblnol and  hydroxymethyl  benzene  (Chemllne,  1989; CAS, 1989; SANSS,
1989).  The  structure,  CAS  number,  molecular weight  and empirical  formula
for benzyl alcohol are as  follows:
CAS Registry number:   100-51-6
Empirical formula:  C-.HD0
                     / o
Molecular weight:  108.13
1.2.   CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    Benzyl alcohol  1s a  colorless  liquid with  a  mild aromatic odor  (Rlngk
and Thelmer,  1979).    In  Us purest  state,  H  has the  distinct  odor of  a
rose.    It  Is  soluble  In most  organic solvents such  as chloroform,  ether,
glycerol  and  alcohol  (Rlngk  and  Thelmer,  1979;  Sax  and  Lewis,   1987}.
Selected physical properties of benzyl alcohol  are  as follows:
    Melting point:        -15.3°C                Weast et al.,  1988
    Boiling point:        205.3°C               .Weast et al.,  1988
    Density:              1.0419 g/mi            Weast et al.,  1988
    Vapor Pressure        0.11 mm Hg             Rlddlck et  al., 1986
      at 25°C:
    Water Solubility      40.00 g/l              Rlngk and Thelmer. 1979
      at 25'C:
    Log Kow:              1.10                   Hansch and  Leo, 1985
0269d                               -1-                              11/01/89

-------
    Flash point:
    Conversion factor
      at 25°C:
105°C
1  ppm = 4.40 mg/m3
Sax and Lewis, 1987
    Benzyl alcohol Is  readily  esterlfled  with a variety of  organic  adds  In
the  presence  of  an  acid  catalyst.    It can  be  readily   oxidized  to  the
corresponding aldehyde, and under vigorous conditions,  It can  be  oxidized  to
benzole  acid.   Benzyl  alcohol   can   also  be  catalytlcally   hydrogenated,
producing toluene (Rlngk and Thelmer,  1979).
1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA
    Benzyl alcohol  Is  commercially  prepared by  the  alkaline  hydrolysis  of
benzyl  chloride  using  sodium  carbonate  (Rlngk  and Thelmer,  1979).   Benzyl
alcohol  can  also  be prepared  by the  hydrolysis  of  benzyl  chloride  using
other catalysts, by the Grlgnard  or related  metalatlon  reactions  with  benzyl.
chloride and  by  the  reduction of  benzole acid, benzole acid  derivatives  or
benzaldehyde.  During  1977, 24  U.S.  manufacturing plants produced  115-1150
thousand pounds of benzyl  alcohol  (TSCAPP,  1989}.   The  primary manufacturing
site  was  Monroe Chemical,  Inc.,  Eddystone,  DE.  Current U.S. manufacturers
of  benzyl  alcohol are  Chemical   Dynamics  Corp., South  Plalnfleld,  NJ;  ICI
Agricultural   Products  Group,   Edison,   NJ;   and   Kalama  Chemicals,   Inc.,
Seattle, MA  (SRI,  1988;  USITC,  1987,  1988).   More current  U.S.  production
data were not located In the available literature cited In  Appendix A.
1.4.   USE DATA
    Benzyl alcohol 1s  used 1n  photographic developers  for color  films,  as a
degreaslng agent  In  rug cleaners and as  a  solvent for  dyestuffs,  ballpoint
pen Inks, cellulose esters, casein, waxes,  etc.   It Is  also  used to preserve
aqueous  and  oily  parenteral   drugs   In   cough  syrups,  ointments,  Insect
ointments  and  repellents, dermatologlcal  aerosol  sprays,  and  ophthalmic,
0269d
          -2-
                    11/01/89

-------
burn and  dental  solutions.  Cosmetics  such as  nail  lacquers and hair  dyes
contain benzyl alcohol, as well.  The aliphatic  esters  of  benzyl  alcohol  are
used In flavorings, fragrances, soaps and perfumes  (Rlngk  and Thelmer,  1979;
Sax and Lewis, 1987).
1.5.   SUMMARY
    Benzyl alcohol  1s  a  colorless  liquid with  a  mild aromatic  odor  (R1ngk
and Thelmer,  1979).  It  Is soluble  In most organic solvents  such as  chloro-
form, ether,  glycerol  and alcohol,  and  1s  moderately soluble  In water  (Sax
and Lewis,  1987).   Benzyl alcohol  1s usually  produced  commercially by  the
catalytic hydrolysis of  benzyl  chloride, although reduction  of benzole  add
or  benzole  add  derivatives  Is  also feasible  (Rlngk and  Thelmer,  1979).
Three companies currently  manufacture benzyl alcohol  (SRI,  1988;  USITC  1987,
1988);  a  large proportion Is  used In flavorings and  fragrances  (SRI,  1988).«
Benzyl  alcohol Is  also used  In development of  color  photographic film,  as  a
solvent  for  dyestuffs,   Inks   and  cosmetics  and  1n  the  preservation  of
parenteral  drugs   and  medical  syrups,  ointments  and aerosols   (Rlngk  and
Thelmer, 1979; Sax and  Lewis,  1987).
0269d                               -3-                              11/01/89

-------
                     2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT
2.1.   AIR
    Based on a  vapor  pressure of 0.11 mrn  Hg at  25°C  (Rtddlck  et  al.,  1986),
benzyl alcohol  ts expected  to  exist almost entirely  1n the vapor  phase  In
the ambient atmosphere (Elsenrelch et al., 1981).
2.1.1.   Reaction  with Hydroxyl  Radicals.   Using the  method  of  Atkinson
(1985),  the  half-life  for  the  gas-phase  reaction  of  benzyl  alcohol  with
photochemically   produced   hydroxyl   radicals    In  the  atmosphere   can  be
estimated  at  2  days,  based on  a  calculated   rate  constant  of  S.llxlO"15
cm3/molecule-sec  and  an average  atmospheric  hydroxyl radical  concentration
of  5xl05  molecules/cm3.   This  process  Is   probably  the  most  Important
atmospheric fate process for benzyl alcohol.
2.1.2.   Reaction with  Ozone.   Benzyl alcohol  1s  not susceptible  to  oxlda-*
tlon by ozone In the atmosphere (Atkinson, 1985; U.S.  EPA,  1987).
2.1.3.'  Physical  Removal   Processes.   Based  on  Its  water  solubility,  40
g/a (R1ngk and Thelmer, 1979),  benzyl  alcohol  may undergo  dissolution  Into
clouds and subsequently be removed from the atmosphere In precipitation.
2.1.4.   Photolysis.    The  direct   photochemical   degradation   of   benzyl
alcohol 1n the atmosphere  Is not expected to be an Important fate process.
2.2.   WATER
2.2.1.   Hydrolysis.   Benzyl  alcohol  probably  does  not undergo  hydrolysis
since 1t contains no hydrolyzable functional groups (Lyman et al., 1982).
2.2.2.   Oxidation.   Based on  the  experimentally  determined  rate  constant
for the  reaction of  benzyl alcohol  with  alkylperoxy radicals,  2.4 a/mol-s
(Hendry et al.,  1974), and  an  estimated alkylperoxy  concentration  In water
of  lxlO~»  mol/4  (Mill  et  al.,  1980),  the half-life for  this  reaction  1s
0269d
-4-
11/01/89

-------
9 years.  The  half-life  for  the reaction of  benzyl  alcohol  with  photocheml-
cally  produced hydroxyl  radicals  1n  water  can  be estimated  at -100  days
using  an   experimentally   determined  rate  constant  of   8.4xlQ»   a/mol-s
(Dorfman and  Adams,  1973) and  a optimal  hydroxyl  radical  concentration  of
IxlCT17 mol/l In natural waters  (Mill  et al.,  1980).
2.2.3.   Photolysis.    No  reaction  was  observed  during  a  4-hour  sunlight
Irradiation  of  benzyl  alcohol  In  water  (Draper  and  Crosby,  1983).   Thus,
direct photochemical  degradation of benzyl  alcohol  1n water Is probably  not
an Important fate process.
2.2.4.   Mlcroblal Degradation.   Benzyl  alcohol  underwent 60.8%  degradation
In  a  5-day  test using  a sewage  sludge  Inoculum  under  aerobic  conditions
(Belly and  Goodhue,  1976).   In  a  screening  test,  benzyl alcohol  underwent
>75%  aerobic  degradation  within  8   weeks  using  a  sewage  sludge  Inoculum*
(Shelton and  Tledje,  1984).   Benzyl   alcohol  (100 mg/it)  underwent 79%  and
87% degradation  after  5.4 and 8.3  days,  respectively, under  aerobic  condi-
tions using  a  sewage  seed (Urano  and Kato, 1986).   In a  5-day  test,  benzyl
alcohol underwent 33%  biological THOD using a sewage  Inoculum (Core et al.,
1975).  These  studies  suggest rapid  aerobic  blodegradatlon  1n environmental
waters.
    Benzyl  alcohol underwent  fast  blodegradatlon  after a  2-month  acclimation
period  under  anaerobic  conditions   using  a  salt  marsh  sediment  Inoculum
(Balba et  al., 1981).   Anaerobic  blodegradatlon  for  benzyl alcohol  using a
sludge seed  from two different  waste   treatment plants  was  complete within 2
weeks  (Horowitz et  al.,  1982).   However,  the  sampling  frequency was  not
reported;  thus,  It  Is  not  clear at what  rate  benzyl  alcohol  underwent
degradation.
0269d                               -5-                              11/01/89

-------
2.2.5.   B1oconcentrat1on.   The  BCF  for  benzyl  alcohol  Is  4.04,  based on
the  log  KOW>  1.81  (Hansch  and Leo,  1985).   The  regression  equation,  log
BCF  e 0.76  log  K   - 0.23,  was used  In this determination  {Lyman et  al.,
1982).  This value suggests that concentration In fish  and aquatic  organisms
Is not an Important fate process.
2.2.6.   Adsorption.    Based  on  experimental   K     values   In  soil   that
ranged from <5-16 (Brlggs, 1981; Southworth and  Keller,  1986),  adsorption to
sediment and  suspended  organic  material  Is not  expected to be an  Important
fate process.
2.2.7.   Volatilization.   Based  on  benzyl  alcohol's  water  solubility, 40
g/8,   at  25°C   (R1ngk  and  Thelmer,  1979),   and  Us   vapor  pressure of
4.1xl(T» mm  Hg   40  g/l  at  25°C  (Rlddlck  et  al.,   1986),  a  Henry's  Law
constant of  3.91xlO~7  atm  mVmolecule  at  25°C can   be  calculated  (Lyman*
et  al.,  1982).   Using  the   bond  method of  Mine  and  Hookerjee  (1975),  a
Henry's  Law  constant  of  2.28xlO~7  atm  •   mVmolecule  at   25°C  can be
obtained.   These  values suggest that  volatilization  of benzyl alcohol  from
water  Is  not  an  Important  fate   process.   The  estimated  volatilization
half-life from a  model  river  1 m deep,  flowing 1 m/sec, with a  wind velocity
of  3 m/sec  Is  97  days,  based on  the  smaller of  the above Henry's  Law
constants (Lyman et al., 1982).
2.3.   SOIL
2.3.1.   M1crob1al Degradation.   Pertinent data regarding  the degradation
of benzyl alcohol 1n  soil  were  not located  In  the  available literature cited
In Appendix  A.   Bacteria obtained from soil  and grown  on phenol or  toluene
degraded benzyl   alcohol  (Chambers   et  al., 1963;  Claus and  Walker,  1964;
Kramer and  Doetsch, 1950).   In water,  blodegradatlon  of benzyl  alcohol would
probably occur rapidly  under  both aerobic and  anaerobic conditions,  suggest-
ing rapid blodegradatlon In soil.
0269d
-6-
11/01/89

-------
2.3.2.   Adsorption/Leaching.   Experimental  K    values  for  benzyl  alcohol
range  from  <5-26.9 (BMggs, 1981;  Southworth  and Keller,  1986),  suggesting
high mobility 1n soil  for benzyl alcohol  (Swann et al.,  1983}
2.3.3.   Volatilization.    The   relatively  high  vapor  pressure  for  benzyl
alcohol, 0.11 mm  Hg at  25°C (R1dd1ck et al.,  1986),  suggests  that volatili-
zation from  dry soil  Is  an Important fate process.   However,  volatilization
from moist or wet  soil may not  be significant.
2.4.   SUMMARY
    In the atmosphere, benzyl alcohol probably  exists almost  entirely  In  the
vapor  phase  (Elsenrelch  et  al.,  1981).   Apparently,  the gas-phase  reaction
with  photochemically  produced  hydroxyl  radicals  is  the primary  atmospheric
degradation  pathway (half-life  of -2  days)  (Atkinson, 1985).   Wet deposition
may also occur.  The  reactions  both with ozone and with  direct photochemical1
degradation are not expected to be Important fate processes.
    In water,  the dominant  fate  process  1s probably microblal  degradation.
Benzyl alcohol  rapidly  degraded In water  under aerobic (Belly  and  Goodhue,
1976; Core et al., 1975;  Shelton and  Tledje,  1984; Urano and  Kato, 1986)  and
anaerobic  (Balba  et  al.,  1981;  Horowitz  et  al., 1982)  conditions In  the
laboratory.   Photolysis,  hydrolysis,  volatilization  to  the   atmosphere  and
chemical oxidation are all  expected to be slow processes  In  water.   Adsorp-
tion  to sediment and  suspended  organic matter,  as well  as  bloaccumulatlon In
fish and aquatic organisms, are probably not Important fate processes.
    In  soil,  benzyl  alcohol  displays  high  mobility   and readily  leaches
through  soil  (Brlggs,  1981;  Southworth  and   Keller,  1986;   Swann  et  al.,
1983).  Microblal  degradation  In  soil may  occur; however,  conclusive  data
were  not  located  1n  the  available literature.   Volatilization  from  dry  soil
to  the atmosphere  may be an Important fate  process;  however,  It Is  probably
not an Important process  In wet soils.

0269d                               -7-                              11/01/89

-------
                                 3.   EXPOSURE
    Benzyl alcohol results from both  natural  and  anthropogenic  activity.   It
Is  found  In  various  foods  and  Is  used  In  a wide  range of  applications.
Primary  sources  of  release  Include  losses  In  wastewater  and  fugitive
emissions during Us commercial manufacture and formulation.
    The National Occupational  Exposure  Survey estimated  that  203,108 workers
are  exposed  to  benzyl   alcohol   (NIOSH,  1984).   Based  on  the  available
monitoring and  use  data,  the general population apparently would  be exposed
to benzyl alcohol by  Inhalation,  dermal .contact and Ingestlon during the use
of common  household  products  In  which  It  1s  contained.   Minor  exposure can
occur through the Ingestlon of food In which benzyl alcohol occurs naturally.
3.1.   NATER
    Quantitative monitoring  data  for  benzyl  alcohol  In water  are  limited.
Benzyl alcohol  was  Identified  In wastewater effluent from  the photographic
processing  Industry  (Dagon,  1973)  and  Kraft  paper  mills  In 6/8  samples  at
<0.013 mg/i  (Keith,  1976).   Benzyl  alcohol  was qualitatively  Identified  In
secondary  effluent  from  wastewater  treatment plants  (Ellis  et  a!.,  1982).
The effluent  from a  Los  Angeles  County wastewater  treatment  plant contained
500 yg/i of benzyl alcohol (Gossett et al., 1983).
    Benzyl  alcohol   was  detected  In  leachate  from  a  Barcelona,  Spain,
sanitary  landfill   (Albalges  et  al.,  1986)  and  from  a  municipal  refuse
disposal site In the Netherlands  (Harmsen,  1983).
3.2.   FOOD
    Benzyl alcohol 1s a volatile  flavor component  of baked potatoes (Coleman
et al., 1981),  Beaufort  (Gruyere) cheese  (Dumont  and  Adda,  1978), bacon (Ho
et  al.,  1983)  and  roasted  filberts  (Klnlln  et  al., 1972).   It Is  also  a
0269d
-8-
11/01/89

-------
volatile component of  blended  nectarines,  but was not  Identified  In  a  head-
space analysis of the  Intact fruit  {Takeoka  et  al.,  1988).   These  monitoring
data Indicate that the general population  can be  exposed  to small  amounts  of
benzyl  alcohol  by Ingesting these  foods;  however,  quantitative  Information
Is not  available.
3.3.   INHALATION
    Pertinent data regarding  the ambient concentration of  benzyl  alcohol  In
the  atmosphere  were  not   located   In   the  available  literature  cited  In
Appendix A.   Benzyl   alcohol  was  found In  the gaseous  effluent  from  four
waste  Incinerators  (James  et al.,  1984} and  In  gasoline and  dlesel  engine
exhaust  (Hampton  et  al.,  1982;   Mulawa  and  Cadle,  1981;  Selzlnger  and
Dlmltrlades, 1972).
3.4.   DERMAL
    Pertinent  data   regarding  dermal  exposure  to  benzyl  alcohol  were  not
located In  the  available  literature cited  In Appendix  A.   Benzyl  alcohol  1s
used In perfumes, ointments, ophthalmic  and  burn  solutions, Insect ointments
and  repellents,  dermatologlcal  aerosol  sprays,  cosmetics and  the  preserva-
tion of aqueous  and  oily  parenteral drugs  (R1ngk  and  Thelmer,  1979;  Sax and
Lewis,  1987).  Use of these products results  In  dermal  exposure.
3.5.   OTHER
    Benzyl   alcohol   Is  also  used  1n  flavorings,  cough  syrups  and  dental
solutions  (R1ngk and  Thelmer,  1979;   Sax  and  Lewis, 1987).   Exposure  to
benzyl  alcohol may occur during the use of  these products.
3.6.   SUMMARY
    Benzyl   alcohol  occurs  naturally In some  foods (Coleman  et al.,  1981;
Dumont  and Adda,  1978; Ho et al.,  1983;  Klnlln  et al., 1972; Takeoka et al.,
1988).   It  Is  also a man-made compound  used  predominantly  1n  flavorings and


0269d                                -9-                              11/01/89

-------
fragrances, household  remedies and  other common  household products  (Rlngk
and Thelmer,  1979;  Sax and Lewis, 1987).  Although  quantitative  Information
1s  lacking,  available data  suggest  that  the general  population  may  be
exposed to  benzyl  alcohol primarily by  Inhalation.  Exposure can also  occur
by  Ingestlon  and  dermal  contact  during  the  use of  products  In which  It  Is
contained.
    Benzyl  alcohol  can be released  to  the environment by  various  pathways.
Primary sources  of  release  Include wastewater  emissions  from Its  manufac-
ture, formulation and  use In commercial  products  (Oagon,  1973;  Keith,  1976),
effluent  from sewage treatment plants  (Ellis  et  al., 1982;. Gossett  et a!.,
1983) and  landfill  leaching  (Albalges  et al.,  1986;  Harmsen,  1983).   Benzyl
alcohol was detected  In  Incinerator emissions and  exhaust of gasoline  and
dlesel engines  (Hampton  et al.,  1982;  Mulawa  and  Cadle,  1981;  Selzlnger  and'
Dlmltrlades, 1972; James et al.,  1984).
0269d
-lO-
ll/01/89

-------
by  benzyl   alcohol  of  400  mg/a.    An  ECQ  of  300  mg/a  and  an  EC10Q
                         4.  ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
4.1.   AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
4.1.1.   Acute  Toxic  Effects  on  Fauna.   Two   tests   of   benzyl   alcohol
toxldty  have  been  performed  In  freshwater   Invertebrates.   Knle  et  al.
(1983)  reported  an  EC™  for  Immobilization of  water  fleas, Daphnla  magna.
                                                              —-•""" —•  	"—
                                                                           Of
500  mg/a  were  also  reported.    No  experimental  details   were  provided.
Sinnlah (1983) studied the acute  toxldty  of benzyl  alcohol  to  mosquito eggs
and larvae.   Eggs of  Aedes aegyptl and Aedes scutellarls. 5-14 days  old and
Immersed  In  hay Infusion, were exposed  to various concentrations of  benzyl
alcohol  for  24-72 hours.  Water  temperature was  kept  between  25 and  27°C.
Results  were  similar  In  eggs  of  both  species,  with  LD5Q values  of  160
a/hectare.   Tests  were  also  done  using  larvae and  pupae.   LD5Q values  of*
105-110  a/hectare were reported  In first  Instar  larvae.   Third and  fourth
Instar  larvae  were  less  sensitive,  with  LD5Q  values  of  126-129  a/hec-
tare.  Concentrations <500 a/hectare failed to  produce mortality In  pupae.
    LC5Q  values  have  been  calculated  for several   species  of  freshwater
fish.   The  acute toxldty of benzyl  alcohol to fathead  minnows,  Plmephales
promelas.  was  determined  by  Mattson  et  al.  (1976).    Juvenile  fathead
minnows,  ranging  1n  age from 4-8  weeks  and 1n length from  1.1-3.1  cm, were
exposed  to  benzyl  alcohol In a  static nonrenewal test.  The temperature of
the water  varied between  18 and  22°C.   Twenty  fish (two groups  of  10) were
tested  at each  of  3-5  nominal  concentrations.   The  1-,  24-,  48-,  72- and
96-hour  LC5Q  values  were 770,  770,  770,  480 and  460 mg/a,  respectively.
Toxldty  was  much  higher In  blueglll  sunflsh,  Lepomls macrochlrus.   In  a
static  acute  test conducted  by  Dawson et  al.  (1977).  Blueglll,  which varied
from  33-75  mm In length, were exposed to  nominal  concentrations  of  5-56 ppm
0269d                               -11-                             11/01/89

-------
(mg/l) of  benzyl alcohol  for  96  hours  at  23°C.   The 96-hour  LC5Q was  10
ppm  (mg/l).   Kn1e  et  al.  (1983)  reported  an LC5Q  of  646  mg/t  1n  golden
orfe,  Leudscus  Idus.    The  LCn   was  630 . mg/i   and  the   LC,__   was   662
                  	           U     '                          IUU
mg/i.  No experimental  details  of this study were provided.
    Several  toxldty  screening  studies  have  been  conducted In  freshwater
fish.   Larval   sea  lampreys,  Petromyzon  marlnus.   varying   1n  length  from
7.5-12.5 cm,  were exposed  to  5  mg/l  of  benzyl alcohol  for  24 hours under
static conditions at 13°C {Applegate  et al.,  1957).   No  effects  were seen In
the  two  lampreys  tested.   Exposure  to  5  mg/fi. of  benzyl alcohol  did  not
have  toxic  effects on  blueglll  sunflsh,  Lepomls  macrochlrus.  goldfish,
Carasslus  auratas.  or  trout,  Sal mo  trutta.  In similar  studies  (HolUs  and
Lennon,  1954;  Wood, 1954).   In  one  study, benzyl  alcohol was  forcefed  to
carPt Cyprlnus  carplo.  at  doses  of  127-136 mg/kg  bw  using gelatin  capsules'
(Loeb and  Kelly,  1963).  The fish, which weighed an average  of  1.4  kg,  were
placed In  18°C  running  spring  water for  observation.  No  effects were noted
after 48 hours 1n the three fish  tested.
    One  study  of the acute  toxlclty of  benzyl alcohol  to a marine  species
was  located  In  the  literature.    Tidewater  sllversldes,  Henldla  beryl Una.
ranging  In length  from  40-100  mm,  were exposed to  nominal  concentrations of
10-32 ppm  (mg/i)  benzyl  alcohol  under static conditions at  20°C  (Dawson et
al., 1977).  The 96-hour LC5Q was estimated to be  15 ppm (mg/H).
4.1.2.   Chronic Effects on Fauna.
    4.1.2.1.    TOXICITY — Pertinent  data  regarding  the  effects of  chronic
exposure  of  aquatic  fauna  to  benzyl  alcohol  were  not   located   In   the
available literature cited In Appendix A.
    4.1.2.2.    BIOACCUMULATION/BIOCONCENTRATION -  Pertinent  data  regarding
the  bloaccumulatlon/bloconcentratlon  potential  of  benzyl alcohol  In aquatic
fauna were not located In the available literature  cited In Appendix  A.
0269d
-12-
11/01/89

-------
4.1.3.   Effects on Flora.
    4.1.3.1.   TOXICITY — The effects  of  benzyl  alcohol on  photosynthesis,
nHrogenase activity and  growth  In algae were studied  by Stratton  and  Corke
(1982).   Blue-green  algae,   Anabaena   Inaequalls,  Anabaena  cyllndrlca  and
Anabaena varlabllls. and  green algae,  Chlorella pyrenoldosa  and  Scenedesmus
quadrlcauda.  were  tested.    The   3-hour   EC5Q  for  photosynthetlc  effects,
measured  by  uptake  of  14C02   from   NaH14C03,  was   >100  ppm   (mg/i)   In
all five  species.   The 5-hour EC,-n  for Inhibition of  nHrogenase  activity,
measured by acetylene  reduction,  1n A.  Inaequalls and  A.  cyllndrlca  also
exceeded  100  ppm  (mg/l).  Growth,  calculated from  absorbance values,  was
unaffected  by 12- to 14-day exposures to benzyl alcohol concentrations  of 10
ppm  (mg/8.)  In  any  of  these  species.   A  second   study  of  the  effects  of
benzyl alcohol  on  algae was  conducted  on  Haematocqcc^us, pluv.1a11s  by Knle et%
al.  (1983).  The  EC5Q  for   reduced  growth  was  2600  mg/8.  1n this  study.
No experimental details were provided.
    4.1.3.2.   BIOCONCENTRATION -- Pertinent  data   regarding  the  bloconcen-
tratlon potential of benzyl alcohol  In  aquatic  flora  were not located 1n the
available literature cited In Appendix A.
4.1.4.   Effects on  Bacteria.  A  few studies have  Investigated the toxldty
of  benzyl   alcohol  to  bacteria.   The  acute  toxldty  of  benzyl  alcohol  to
Photobacterlum  phosphoreum  was measured by Kaiser et  al.  (1987)  using  the
Hlcrotox  test.   The  30-mlnute EC™  for  light  reduction  In  the  bacterial
suspensions  was  0.66   mM (71.4  mg/8,).   Effects   were produced  at  higher
concentrations  1n  other  studies.  A  cell  multiplication test  was  conducted
In  Pseudomonas  putlda  by  Knle   et  al.  (1983).    The  EC1Q  for  effects  of
benzyl  alcohol  was  658 mg/l. Valshnav,   (1986) Investigated the  effect  of
benzyl alcohol  on  the  blodegredatlon  rate  of  a mixed mlcroblal culture.  The
ECcg for rate reduction was 0.047 mol/l (5083 mg/i).

0269d                               -13-                             11/01/89

-------
4.2.   TERRESTRIAL TOXICOLOGY
4.2.1.   Effects on  Fauna.   The  acute  oral toxlclty  of  benzyl alcohol  was
determined  In   two  species  of birds  (Schafer  et  al.,  1983).   Birds  were
trapped  1n  the wild  and held  1n captivity  for 2-6  weeks before  testing.
Benzyl  alcohol  was administered  by gavage In  propylene  glycol.   The  LD.
was 100 mg/kg In redwing blackbirds and >100 mg/kg In starlings.
4.2.2.   Effects on  Flora.   The  effect of benzyl   alcohol  on fungus  spore
germination was  studied by  Wilson et  al.  (1987).   This  chemical  Inhibited
spore  germination  In  both  Mon111n1a fructlcola and  Botrytls  clnerea at  a
concentration   of   125   yl/8,   (131   mg/a).    Other   studies   of   benzyl
alcohol's effects on terrestrial flora  were not located.
4.3.   FIELD STUDIES
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the effects  of   benzyl  alcohol  on  flora  and*
fauna  In the  field  were not  located  In  the  available literature cited  In
Appendix A.
4.4.   AQUATIC RISK ASSESSMENT
    The  lack of an adequate  quantity of  pertinent  data regarding  the effects
of  exposure of  aquatic  fauna and  flora  to  benzyl  alcohol  precluded  the
development of a freshwater  criterion  (U.S. EPA/OWRS,  1986).   Available data
are displayed  In Figure  4-1.   Although  studies on  Daphnla and mosqultos were
available,  these were  not used because  study  details were not provided for
the former,  and results were  reported  1n  nonstandard  units  for  the latter.
Additional  data  required for  the  development  of  a freshwater  criterion
Include  the results of  acute assays  with a salmonld fish species,  planktonlc
and benthlc  crustaceans, an Insect, a  nonarthropod and  nonchordate  species
and an  Insect  or  species   from  a phylum  not previously  represented.   The
development of  a  freshwater  criterion  also requires data  from three chronic
toxldty tests and one bloconcentratlon  study.
0269d
-14-
11/01/89

-------
TEST TYPE
Family
*1
Chordate (Salmonid-f ish)
#2
Chordate (warmwater fish)
#3
Chordate (fish or amphibian)
#4
Crustacean (planktonic)
*5
Crustacean (benthic)
#6
Insectan
*7
non-Arthropod/-Chordate
#8
New Insectan or phylum
representative
#9
Algae
#10
Vascular plant
GMAVa
(mg/L)
NA
10*>
460°
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GMCVa
(mg/L)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
>100d
NA
BCFa
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
   •NA-Not available
   bLCso for bluegHI sunflsh, Lepomis macrochirus
   cLCso for fathead minnow, Plmephales promelas
   "ECso for effects on photosynthesis and nitrogenase activity In the
    blue-green alga, Anabaena Inaeoualls
                                  FIGURE 4-1

    Organization Chart for  Listing  GHAVs,  GMCVs and BCFs Required  to  Derive
Numerical Water  Quality  Criteria by  the  Method of U.S. EPA/OURS  (1986)  for
the Protection of Freshwater Aquatic Life from Exposure to  Benzyl  Alcohol
0269d
-15-
11/01/89

-------
    The lack of pertinent  data  regarding the effects of exposure  of  aquatic
fauna and  flora  to benzyl alcohol  precluded  the development of a  saltwater
criterion  (U.S.  EPA/OWRS,  1986).   Available  data  are  shown  In Figure 4-2.
Additional  data   required  for   the  development  of  a  saltwater   criterion
Include the results of  acute  assays with a chordate  species, a nonarthropod
and  nonchordate  species,  a  mysld  or  panaeld  crustacean,  three  additional
nonchordate species and  one other  species  of marine  fauna.  The development
of  a saltwater  criterion  also  requires data  from  three  chronic  toxlclty
tests, one  test  on a species of  algae  or  vascular plant and one  bloconcen-
tratlon study.
 I
4.5.   SUMMARY
    Benzyl  alcohol was  considerably more  toxic  to  bluegllls (LC™  =   10
mg/i}  and  tidewater  sllversldes  (LC5Q  =  15  mg/i)   In  a  study  by  Dawson*
et  al.   (1977)  than  It  was  to  fathead minnows   (LC™  =  460 rng/i)  In  a
study by  Mattson  et al.  (1976).   These  differences may be  species-related,
but  the  facts  that two  low values were reported  In  one study and  one high
value was reported  1n another study  suggest  that differences  In experimental
procedures  could  have   affected   the  results.  An  LC5Q  of  646  mg/a.  was
reported  In golden orfe (Kn1e et  al.,  1983), but   lack of details  prevented
assessment  of  this study.  No  effects  were  reported In larval sea  lamprey
(Applegate  et  al., 1957), blueglll,  goldfish or  trout (HolUs and  Lennon,
1954;  Wood,  1954)  acutely   exposed   to   5  mg/8.   of  benzyl  alcohol   1n
screening-type   studies.   Among   Invertebrates,  an  EC™  of  400  mg/l  was
reported  for  Daphnla Immobilization  (Knle et  al.,  1983),  and LO^g  values
of  105-160 a/hectare  were reported In  mosqultos  (Slnnlah,   1983).   Among
algae,  the  EC™  values  for  effects   on  photosynthesis  and  nltrogenase
activity  exceeded  100  mg/a 1n all  five  species tested  (Stratton  and Corke,
0269d
-16-
11/01/89

-------
Family
HI
Chordate
#2
Chordate
«3
non-Arthropod/-Chordate
14
Crustacean (Mysid/Panaeid)
#5
non-Chordate
#6
non-Chordate
*7
non-Chordate
#8
Other
#9
Algae
#10
Vascular plant
aNA = Not available
bLCcn for tidewater sllverslde,

GMAVa
(mg/L)
15*
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Menldla berylUna
TEST TYPE
GMCVa

-------
1982).   The  EC5Q  for  reduced  growth was  2600  mg/8, In  one species  (Knle
et al.,  1983).   Effects  1n bacteria were reported  at concentrations  ranging
from  71.4-5083  mg/l  (Kaiser  et al.,  1987;   Kn1e  et al.,   1983;  Valshnav,
1986).   Studies  of  terrestrial  organisms  showed  that  131  mg/i of  benzyl
alcohol  Inhibited  spore  germination  In fungi   (Wilson et al.,  1987) and that
L05Q  values  were  >100  mg/kg  bw In  two  species of  birds  (Schafer et  al.,
1983).
0269d
-18-
11/01/89

-------
                             5.  PHARHACOKINETICS
5.1.   ABSORPTION
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the  extent  and  rate  of  absorption of  benzyl
alcohol  from   Inhalation   exposure  were  not   located   In   the  available
literature cited 1n Appendix A.
    Benzyl alcohol  administered  orally by  stomach  tube to rabbits  In  a 450
mg/kg  dose  was  rapidly  absorbed,   as  measured  by  urinary  excretion  of
hlppurlc acid  at  65.7  and  72.8% of the dose at  6 and  24 hours, respectively
(Olack and Lewis, 1928).   A  1000 mg  dose  of an aqueous suspension given to a
r-abbH by stomach tube was  similarly  absorbed  by the excretion of 8254 of the
dose as  either  glucuronldes  or ether-soluble acids  (Bray  et  al., 1951).  In
another gavage  study 1n  rabbits, compounds  found In  the urine after  24 hours
accounted for  98% of  a  250 mg/kg dose  of benzyl alcohol,  Indicating  rapid*
absorption of  the compound  (Bray  et  al.,  1958).  Humans  also  were  found to
absorb a major  portion of  a 1500-2000 mg  dose given orally,  as shown  by the
excretion of 74-88% of the dose as hlppurlc acid {Snapper et al., 1924).
    In  an  J[n  vitro study  of  the percutaneous  penetration  of  14C-labeled
benzyl alcohol  In human  autopsy skin  (Menczel  and Malbach, 1970), absorption
was measured  In an  absorption cell  as  the percent of  dose applied  to the
epidermal  layer of  the skin  that  was  found  In the  normal  saline  dermal
perfusate after  5 days.  Benzyl-7-l4C-alcohol  (2.7  mg) was  dissolved  In 50
pi  benzene.   The amount of  benzyl  alcohol that  diffused through  the skin
ranged  from  4.45-32.74%,  with the  variation  thought  to  be  related  to the
thickness of  the dermal layer.   A  large  proportion  of  the  benzyl  alcohol
remained In  the epidermal  layer of  skin,  even  after  the  5-day experimental
period.  The  ratio  of dermal  to  epidermal retention was  generally  <1  (mean
of  0.76  for  five experiments).   In  a study using the  same methods  (Henczel


0269d                               -19-                             11/01/89

-------
and Malbach,  1972),  the dermal/saline solution equilibrium concentration of
benzyl-7-14C-alcohol  ranged  from 0.232-0.270,  and  conformed  well  with  the
K  of   0.254.   The  stratum  corneum  retained  the  major  portion  of  benzyl
alcohol that was partitioned Into the epidermis.
5.2.   DISTRIBUTION
    Pertinent data  regarding the  distribution of  benzyl  alcohol  following
Inhalation  or  oral exposure  were not  located In  the available  literature
cited In Appendix A.
    Klmura et al.  (1971) administered benzyl alcohol  In  Intravenous  doses of
52  and  105 mg/kg  to  unanesthetlzed  beagles  of  both  sexes.   The  plasma
half-life was  -1.5 hours.  The  calculated  apparent volume of  distribution,
11  I/kg,  suggested that  the major  portion  of the drug  was  distributed In
the tissues.
5.3.   METABOLISM
    A  number  of  older  studies   reported  that benzyl alcohol  was  rapidly
oxidized  to  benzole   acid,   which   was  then  conjugated  with  glyclne  and
excreted by the  kidney as  hlppurU acid 1n animals and man (Snapper  et al.,
1924;  Olack and  Lewis,  1928; Stekol,  1939).   Conjugation of benzole  with
glydne  Is  catalyzed   by   glydne  acyltransferase   In   the   mitochondria!
fraction of the liver  (Lebel et al.,  1988).
    Several studies  of  benzyl  alcohol  metabolism  from oral  administration
have  been  performed   with  rabbits.    Olack and  Lewis  (1928)  administered
benzyl  alcohol  to male  rabbits  by  stomach tube  (448-450  mg, expressed as
equivalent  dose  of   benzole  acid/kg  bw)  and found that  It  was  rapidly
oxidized  to  benzole   add  and  excreted  In  the  urine  as  hlppurlc  add,
accounting  for 65.754 and 72.8X of  the dose  at  6 and 24 hours,  respectively.
0269d
-20-
11/01/89

-------
Administration  of  450  mg/kg  sodium benzoate  to  the rabbits  resulted  In
similar recoveries, which  Indicated  that  the oxidation of benzyl alcohol  to
benzole acid  occurred  at least as  rapidly  as the  formation and  elimination
of  hlppuHc  acid.   A  rabbit  given  1000  mg  of  an  aqueous  benzyl  alcohol
suspension by  stomach  tube excreted  8254  of  the dose  as  either  glucuronldes
(2454 of  excreted amount)  or  ether-soluble  adds  (76% of excreted  amount);
however,  when  doses  of  500-1600 mg  were  administered  with  glyclne,  the
glucuronlde  fraction  dropped  to   2-9%,  and   the  ether-soluble   fraction
Increased  to  91-98% of  the excreted  dose   (Bray  et  al.,  1951).   When  the
Initial rate  of  benzyl  alcohol  conversion was greater  than the  maximum rate
of  glyclne  conjugation,  benzole  add  was found  In  the blood.   Bray et  al.
(1958)   Investigated  the metabolism  of benzyl  alcohol (suspended  1n water)
administered  by  stomach  tube  to   rabbits   In  doses  of  250  mg/kg.    The*
compounds found  In urine after  24 hours,  as a percent  of the dose  (means  of
4-6  experiments),  were  2%  mercapturlc  add,   74%  glyclne  conjugates,  8%
copper-reducing  material  (as  glucuronlc  acid)  and  14% glucoslduronlc  acid,
accounting for  98% of  the  dose.  Humans on a pure  milk and flour diet  given
1500-2000  mg  orally  of  benzyl  alcohol   excreted  74-88%  of  the  dose  as
hlppurlc add (Snapper  et al.,  1924),
    HcCloskey  et  al.  (1986)  gave  Intraperltoneal  Injections  of  500-1100
mg/kg  of  benzyl alcohol  (10%  In  peanut oil, v/v)  to adult CD-I male  mice.
Benzyl  alcohol  appeared  In  the plasma within  minutes of administration  at
levels  of  11.0-208.4  g/roi.   Significant  levels  of benzaldehyde,  an  Inter-
mediate In the  oxidation,  were  also found 1n plasma of mice  5  minutes  after
doses  of  benzyl alcohol >700  mg/kg were administered.   Benzaldehyde plasma
concentrations  of 4.2-15.0  g/mi  resulted  from  doses  of  700-1100  mg/kg,
with no  benzaldehyde  detected  In  the  plasma  following  doses  <700  mg/kg.


0269d                               -21-                             11/01/89

-------
Neither benzyl  alcohol  nor benzaldehyde was  found In the  plasma  of  control
mice Injected with either  saline  or  peanut  oil.   At 4 hours after  1ntraper1-
toneal  Injection  of  adults and neonates  with benzyl alcohol  at 1000 mg/kg,
plasma  levels  were   60-70   vg/ma  for  benzyl   alcohol   and  15-16  yg/ma.
for  benzaldehyde  In  both  age groups.  No  differences  were detected  In  the
pattern of metabolism between mature  and  neonatal  mice.   Pretreatment of  the
mice  with  pyrazole,  an  Inhibitor of  alcohol dehydrogenase  and  the  enzyme
responsible for  the  conversion  of benzyl alcohol  to benzaldehyde, Increased
levels  of  benzyl  alcohol  IR  the  plasma.    Pretreatment  of  the  mice  with
dlsulflram, which  Inhibits aldehyde  dehydrogenase,  the  enzyme Involved  1n
the  conversion  of benzaldehyde to  benzole  acid,  markedly  Increased  plasma
benzaldehyde levels to 3 times that of controls.
    In  metabolism  studies  of  subcutaneously administered  benzyl alcohol,  two'
rabbits  Injected  with  1000  mg  of  benzyl   alcohol  excreted  300-400 mg  of
hlppurlc add  1n  the  urine  after  24  hours  (Stekol, 1939).   Stekol  (1939)
Injected  three  rats  subcutaneously  with  500 mg/kg bw  benzyl alcohol  and
found  that the  substance Isolated  from pooled  48-hour  urine samples  was
hlppurlc add (percent of dose not specified).
    In  a   study  of benzyl  alcohol  metabolism  and  elimination,  14  term  (8
male,  6 female) and  9  preterm (5 male,  4  female)  neonates  received Intra-
venous  or  Intramuscular  loading  doses of  phenobarbltal   containing  benzyl
alcohol (Lebel et  al., 1988).   Benzole  add accumulated  In the serum more In
preterm  Infants  than  In  term  Infants,  as determined   by   10-fold  higher
normalized  peak  level   when  measured   by   HPLC  (p<0.001).    Also,  preterm
Infants were  found  to  have  greater percentages  of benzole  add and  less
hlppurlc add 1n  the urine after  doses  of benzyl alcohol  than  term Infants.
0269d
-22-
11/01/89

-------
It has been suggested that the  Immature  livers or  kidneys  of  preterm  Infants
may have a reduced capacity to  detoxify  by glyclne conjugation  the amount of
benzole add produced from the oxidation  of benzyl  alcohol.
    Gershanlk et  al.  (1982)  administered benzyl  alcohol  (0.9%) to neonates
at a  level of  99-234 mg/kg.   The compound was found  In  the serum at a mean
concentration  of  1.QUO.13  mmol/i.   Mean  benzole  acid  and  hlppurlc  acid
concentrations   In   the   urine  were  0.377^0.119  and  1.469_tQ.25   mmol/a,
respectively.   In Infants that  had not received benzyl alcohol, benzole add
and hlppurlc acid were  found  1n the urine at much lower levels (0.029+0.009
and 0.765-0.089 mmol/!.,  respectively).
    An in vitro metabolism study using  guinea pig liver mlcrosomes  (Sloane,
1965)  showed  that   14C-phenol  could   be formed  from  14C-benzyl   alcohol
(ring-labeled); there was  no  mlcrosomal  metabolism of  benzole  add   (In the'
presence of NAOPH) to phenol.
5.4.   EXCRETION
    Orally administered  benzyl alcohol   Is converted  to  benzole add, which
Is then  conjugated  with glydne and excreted  1n  the urine as  hlppurlc add
In animals  and man  (Snapper  et al.,  1924;  Dlack  and  Lewis,  1928).   In the
study  by  Dlack and  Lewis  (1928),  450 mg of  benzyl  alcohol administered to
male rabbits by stomach tube was accounted for as  hlppurlc  add In the urine
at 65.7 and 72.8% of  the  dose  at 6  and  24 hours,  respectively.  Doses of 250
mg/kg administered to rabbits  by gavage  were  recovered In  the  urine  after 24
hours as (percent of  dose):   2% mercapturlc add,  74%  glyclne  conjugates, 8%
copper-reducing material  (as  glucuronlc  add) and 14% glucoslduronlc acid,
accounting for 98% of the dose  (Bray et  al.,  1958).   A dose of  1000  mg given
by stomach  tube to  one  rabbit was excreted  as  either glucuronldes   (24% of
excreted amount) or ether-soluble adds  (76%  of excreted amount), accounting


0269d                               -23-                              11/01/89

-------
for 8254  of  the dose, while  glydne  administered with 500-1600 mg of  benzyl
alcohol  resulted   In the  glucuronlde  fraction  dropping  to  2-9%  and  the
ether-soluble  fraction  rising to 91-98%  of the  excreted  material  (Bray  et
a!., 1951).   Humans  given 1500-2000 mg of  benzyl alcohol  orally while on  a
pure milk and  flour  diet  excreted  74-88%  of  the  dose as  hlppurlc add
(Snapper et al., 1924).
    Following  Intraperltoneal  Injections  of benzyl alcohol  In peanut  oil  to
adult  and neonatal  mice,  McCloskey et  al.  (1986)   suggested  that  benzyl
alcohol  was  eliminated  by saturable kinetics,  so that  small  Increases  In
dosages would result 1n disproportionate levels In the plasma.
    Subcutaneously administered  benzyl  alcohol, In dosages of 1000  mg given
in  three portions  2 hours  apart to rabbits,  was  recovered  in the  urine  as
300-400 mg of hlppurlc acid after 24 hours (Stekol, 1939).
5.5.   SUMMARY
    No data were found  regarding the  extent and rate  of absorption of benzyl
alcohol  from  Inhalation  exposures.   Benzyl  alcohol  was rapidly  absorbed from
orally  administered  doses  In  rabbits  (Dlack  and  Lewis,  1928; Bray  et  al..
1951,  1958)  and man (Snapper  et al.,  1924).  An  hi  vitro study  of  percuta-
neous  penetration  of 14C-benzyl  alcohol  Indicated that  a major  portion  of
the compound  remained in  the stratum corneum of the epidermal  layer  of human
skin.
    No   Information  was  found  regarding  distribution  of   benzyl   alcohol
following  inhalation or  oral exposure.   In  dogs,  the calculated  apparent
volume  of distribution  suggested  that  the major  portion  of  Intravenously
administered  benzyl  alcohol was distributed  In the tissues (Kimura  et al.,
1971).
0269d
-24-
11/01/89

-------
    Metabolism of  benzyl  alcohol  Involves  rapid oxidation  to benzole add
using a  benzaldehyde Intermediate.  Benzole acid  Is  further metabolized to
hlppurlc acid, which  Is excreted  In the urine In both animals and man  (Bray
et al.,  1951,  1958;  Dlack and  Lewis,  1928;  Stekol,  1939; HcCloskey et al.,
1986; Snapper  et  al.,  1924).   Ring-labeled  14C-benzyl  alcohol  was  shown to
form  14C-phenol  1n  guinea   pig   liver   mlcrosomes   where  there  was  no
mkrosomal  metabolism of benzole add  (Sloane,  1965).
    In humans, the.Immature  livers  and kidneys of preterm  Infants appear to
have a reduced capacity to  metabolize  benzyl alcohol  by  glyclne conjugation
(Lebel  et   al.,  1988).   No  differences  were  detected   In  the  pattern  of
metabolism between adult  and  neonatal  mice  {HcCloskey et al., 1986).   Small
Increases In the dose resulted  In  disproportionate plasma levels, Indicating
that benzyl  alcohol was  eliminated  by  saturable kinetics.
0269d                               -25-                             11/01/89

-------
                                 6.   EFFECTS
6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
6.1.1.   Inhalation   Exposure.    Workers  occupational1y   exposed  for   an
undetermined duration to a  high vapor concentration of a  mixture  containing
benzyl  alcohol,  benzene  and  ester  solvents  reported temporary  headaches,
vertigo, nausea,  diarrhea and weight loss (Treon and Staslk, 1983).
    6.1.1.1.   SUBCHRONIC — Pertinent   data    regarding   toxlclty    from
subchronk  Inhalation exposure of  benzyl  alcohol  were not  located 1n  the
available literature cited In Appendix A.
    6.1.1.2.   CHRONIC — Pertinent  data  regarding  toxlclty  from  chronic
Inhalation  exposure   of  benzyl alcohol  were  not  located  1n  the  available
literature dted In Appendix A.
6.1.2.   Oral Exposure.
    6.1.2.1.   SUBCHRONIC — In 16-day and 13-week  studies, F344/N rats and
B6C3F1  mice were  gavaged  with technical-grade  benzyl  alcohol   (99X  pure)
suspended  In  corn oil  (NTP,  1988).   In  the  shorter  experiment,  groups  of
five males and five females  of each  species,  8 weeks old at the start  of the
study,  were administered  0  (vehicle  only),  125,  250,  500,  1000  and  2000
mg/kg 5  days/week  for 12 doses.  (Animals In  the 125  rag/kg dose  groups were
unintentionally  administered  a 10-fold  higher  dose   on   days  8  and  9  of
treatment.)  Animals  were  observed  twice dally  and were  weighed Initially
and  once a  week.   All  animals were necropsled at  the  conclusion of  the
study,  and hlstologlc  examinations were  performed on three  male and  two
female  rats  and four male  mice  In the  500 mg/kg  dose  group and  on  three
female mice  In the 1000 mg/kg dose  group.   All rats  In  the  2000  mg/kg dose
group and 2/5 males and  3/5  females  In the 1000 mg/kg dose group died before
completion  of  the  study.  At  the end  of the study, mean  body  weight  of the
0269d
_26-
11/01/89

-------
male  rats  In  the  1000  mg/kg  dose  group  was 1854  lower  than  that of  the
controls.  Rats  receiving  the  two  highest  dosages were  lethargic and  had
blood  around  the  nose and  mouth and  In  the urinary and  gastrointestinal
tracts;  these  rats also  had  hemorrhages  under the  skin.   Hales In the  500
and  1000 mg/kg  dose  groups,  and  females   In the  250  and  500 mg/kg  dose
groups,  had   rough  hair   coats.    There   were  no  hlstopathologlc  effects
attributable  to treatment  In any rats at any dosage level.
    Effects In mice from  the  16-day  gavage  study  were  similar to those  found
In rats.  All mice  at  the 2000  mg/kg level,  and 1/5 males and 2/5 females at
the 1000 mg/kg dosage  level,  died  before  completion  of the study.  Male mice
receiving 500,  1000 and  2000 mg/kg  and female mice receiving 1000  and 2000
mg/kg  benzyl alcohol  were lethargic  and had  rough  hair  coats.   At  necropsy,
blood  was  found  In the urinary  bladder of  mice  1n  the 1000 and 2000  mg/kg.
dose  groups.   Hlstopathologlc  effects attributable  to  treatment  were  not
found  In any mice at any dosage level.
    In  the  13-week studies,  groups  of  10 male and  10 female rats  and mice
were dosed with  0 (vehicle only), 50,  100,  200,  400 and  800 mg/kg  of  benzyl
alcohol  5  days  a  week for the  duration  of  the  experiment.  Rats  were  7-8
weeks  old  and  mice were  7-9 weeks  old when  placed on  the study.   Animals
were observed twice dally,  weighed Individually at  the  beginning and  end of
the  study  and weighed as  groups  once a  week during the  study.   Moribund
animals were sacrificed.   All animals were  necropsled; those  In the control
groups and the 800 mg/kg  treatment groups  were examined h1stopatholog1cally.
Microscopic examinations  of  the  brains were  performed on  animals in the 400
mg/kg  treatment  groups of  both  species  and  on  all  mice that   died  before
termination of the  study.   Following  dosing  by gavage, 8/10 male rats  admin-
istered 800 mg/kg and one  given  200 mg/kg  died;  four of  the deaths at  the


0269d                               -27-                             11/01/89

-------
highest dose were  attributed to  the  gavage procedure.  In  the  female  rats,
one  vehicle  control,  one  In the  400 mg/kg  dose  group and  two in  the  800
mg/kg  dose group  died  after  being  dosed;  all   deaths  except  one  at  the
highest dose  were  accidental.   Following  treatment,  rats  of both sexes  In
the 800 mg/kg dose group showed  signs of  neurotoxldty Including staggering,
labored breathing and  lethargy;  at the end of  the study,  they  had  mean body
weights lower  than   that of  vehicle  controls  (7%  lower for  males, 5%  lower
for females).  Five  of  10  males  1n this  dose  group had blood around the nose
and mouth  after  8  weeks of  treatment.  At this dose  level, hlstopathologlc
effects attributable to treatment Included necrosis of the  dentate gyrus  of
the  hippocampus  In  9/9 males  and  7/7  females.   Skeletal  muscle  necrosis
(5/10), thymlc  congestion,  hemorrhage and atrophy  (8/10) and  nephrosls  1n
the  kidney (6/9) were also observed In  male  rats at this highest  dosage*
level.
    In mice, no deaths  were  observed  In  the control groups,  In the two lower
dosage groups in males  or  In the 200 mg/kg dose group  In females; one or two
deaths were seen in  the other dosage groups,  but  the only deaths not  related
to the  gavage  procedure were of two females In the high-dose  group.  Final
mean  body  weights  were 5  and 8% less than those  of vehicle controls 1n the
400  and  800 mg/kg   female  dose  groups,   respectively;  all other groups  had
mean  body  weights within 5% of  controls.   In  the  first 2 weeks of the study,
male  and   female mice   staggered  after receiving  the  800 mg/kg  dosage.   No
hlstopathologlc  effects attributable to  treatment  were  seen  In  the  mice.
All  groups had  some mice  with  a  chronic Interstitial pneumonia, which  is
characteristic of a  Sendai Infection.
    6.1.2.2.   CHRONIC  --Two-year  toxicology and carcinogenesis  studies  on
benzyl alcohol  were  conducted using  groups of 50 male and 50 female F344/N
0269d
-28-
11/01/89

-------
rats and 86C3F1 mice  (NTP,  1988).   Technical-grade  benzyl  alcohol  (99% pure)
mixed  In  corn oil was  administered by gavage  5  days/week for 103  weeks  to
rats  In  dosages  of 0  (vehicle  control),  200 and  400  mg/kg,  and  to mice  In
dosages  of  0, 100 and 200 mg/kg.   Although mice  In  the  100 and  200 mg/kg
treatment  groups  were  unintentionally   dosed  with  375   and   750  mg/kg
a-methylbenzyl alcohol  for 4 days  during week  80, no adverse effects  were
noted.   Animals  were  8-9  weeks old  when  treatment   began.   Animals  were
observed twice a  day;  they were weighed  Initially, then once a week for  12
weeks and once a  month thereafter.   All animals were  necropsled,  and hlsto-
loglc examinations on a number' of  organs  and tissues were performed on all
female rats  and  on male rats and mice In the vehicle  control and high-dose
groups, male rats and  mice  that  died  before  the 22nd month and male rats and
mice with  gross  lesions.   The  pituitary  gland  and testes were examined  In'
low-dose male  rats;  the adrenal  gland, brain,  kidney,  liver and  lung  were
examined In  low-dose male mice;  and the brain,  liver,  spleen  and  uterus  were
examined In low-dose  female mice.
    Survival of  the  benzyl alcohol-treated  female  rats at both dose levels
was  significantly  lower  than  that of the  vehicle  controls,  the  low-dose
group after week 71 and  the high-dose  group  after  week 50.  However, many of
the deaths In the treated  rats,  but considerably  fewer 1n  the controls,  were
related to the gavage  procedure.  Respectively,  accidental  and nonacddental
deaths In  groups  of  50  control,  low- and  high-dose female rats were 1, 13,
17, 16,  13 and  20.   Survival  of control and  treated male  rats  and mean  body
weights for  all  rats  within sex groups were  generally comparable  throughout
the study.  No clinical  signs that  could  be  attributed to  the treatment  were
observed.  Rats  In control  and  treated groups at  both dose levels exhibited
swelling In  the  cervical  region, pink eyes  and  red exudate around the eyes,


0269d                               -29-                             11/01/89

-------
signs of slalodacryoadenltls, which was  confirmed  In  sentinel  animals.   Rats
In the  high-dose  groups showed an  Increased  Incidence of  cataracts  (males:
control, 2/50; low dose, 3/50;  high dose,  23/50;  females:  2/50,  2/50,  16/50)
and retinal atrophy  (males:  1/50,  3/50,  24/50, females: 1/50. 3/50,  20/50),
but  this was  attributed to  those  animals  being housed  In  the cages on  the
top  racks,  permitting greater  exposure  to fluorescent  lighting.   High-dose
male rats also had a  higher  Incidence  of epithelial  hyperplasla  of the  fore-
stomach  (control,  0/48;  low dose, 0/19;  high dose, 4/50).  Benzyl  alcohol-
treated  rats   that  died  before completion  of the  study  had an  Increased
Incidence  of   hemorrhage  and   foreign  material  1n  the  respiratory  tract.
Dose-related  effects  in the  respiratory tracts of males  Included Increases
In acute Inflammation  In   the  nasal   tract,  hemorrhages In  the  larynx  and
edema In the  lungs.   Higher  Incidences of  hemorrhage  and foreign material In'
the lungs were seen In both male and female dosed  rats.
    In  female mice,   survival was  significantly lower  In   the control  group
than  In  the  high-dose  group after the  74th  week.  Survival  did  not  differ
between  other  groups  of either sex.   High-dose male and female mice had an
Increased  Incidence  of corpora amylacea  (males:  control,  15/49;  low  dose,
21/48;  high  dose, 22/50;  females:  14/50,  15/48,  25/50),  although  this  was
noted to be "a common,  spontaneously occurring  lesion."   High-dose male mice
had an  Increased  Incidence  of lung congestion, and low-dose male  and  female
mice had an Increased Incidence of  foreign material  In the lungs;  neither of
these effects was statistically significant.
6.1.3.   Other Relevant Information.   In an  acute  Inhalation  study reported
by Smyth et al.  (1951), six rats  (strain and  sex  not specified)  were exposed
to 1000  ppm benzyl alcohol  for 8  hours  and  observed for 14 days.  Three of
the six  rats  died.  The maximum time  that  rats could be exposed to saturated
vapors of benzyl alcohol without death resulting was 2 hours.
0269d
-30-
11/01/89

-------
    Single  oral   dose  LD5Qs   (Intubated)  of  2080  and  1040  mg  of  benzyl
alcohol/kg bw were  reported for rats  (20  animals) and rabbits  (9  animals),
respectively (Graham and Kulzenga, 1945).  Within  30 minutes of  dosing,  both
rats and rabbits became prostrate until  they died.   Intubated  benzyl  alcohol
resulted  In  acute  oral <-D50s  of  1230  mg/kg  (95%  confidence  Intervals  of
1130-1330)  1n  rats  from  a 100%  solution and  1580 mg/kg  (95%  confidence
Intervals of 1410-1770}  In mice from a  25%  solution In corn  oil  (Jenner  et
al., 1964).  In  the rats,  death occurred  within  1  hour  to 4  days;  In mice,
death resulted within  2-18 hours.   Other  signs  of toxldty were  depression
In  both  rats and mice,  coma  within 10-15 minutes  In  rats and  excitability
for 3-4 days In  rats.
    Gruber (1923) reported  that pure benzyl alcohol  In volumes of  2.5-10.8
mi  administered  by  stomach   tube  to  dogs  weighing  12.5-27  kg  caused*
catharsis and emesls,  usually  within minutes  of  dosing.   In  other  studies,
1.0-5.0  mi  of  pure benzyl  alcohol  administered  IntraperUoneally to  dogs
and rabbits and  Intramuscularly to rabbits caused  a  marked Increase In urine
flow {Gruber, 1924).
    Benzyl alcohol  elicited an  antlarrhythmlc effect  1n  dogs  within 30-60
seconds  after  an Intravenous  Injection of  0.1-0.4 ml/kg  of  a 4%  solution
(Elchbaum and Yasaka,  1976).   A similar response 1n rats occurred  after  an
injection of 0.2-0.6  ml/kg of  1-2% benzyl  alcohol.   In  cats,  subcutaneous
administration   of  50-100   ml/kg  of  lactated  Ringer's  solution  containing
1.5% benzyl alcohol as  a  preservative (doses of  benzyl alcohol  were 392 and
660 mg/kg) resulted In  toxic signs  Including ataxla, hyperesthesla,  fasdcu-
latlons of head  and ear muscles,  slight but Increasingly  severe depression,
coma, respiratory  failure,  convulsions  and  death (Culllson et  al.,  1983).
0269d                               -31-                             11/01/89

-------
Lower doses  produced  a slower advancement  of  signs and  longer  progression,
but  death  resulted  In all cases.   Cats  apparently have  a  pronounced  sensi-
tivity to drugs containing benzene  rings, particularly  phenol.   This  Is  due,
In part,  to  a relative deficiency  In their ability to detoxify xenoblotlcs
by glucuronlc  acid  conjugation because of a lack  of  UDP-glucuronyltransfer-
ase activity with respect  to some substrates (Wllcke,  1984).
    3ones  (1967)  reported  an  acute dermal  LD5Q  of  <5.0  ml/kg In  guinea
pigs.   Cats  were  particularly  sensitive  to  dermal  application of  benzyl
alcohol, with  an  average  survival  time  of  22  hours (two animals) after one
20 ma  application  of 100% benzyl  alcohol to their shaved  backs (Graham and
Kulzenga,  1945).    Signs   of  toxlclty  Included  excessive  salivation  and
twitching at  the  site of  application.  Later, animals  exhibited generalized
tremor,  muscular  1ncoord1nat1on,  hind  limb  paralysis  and violent  convul-'
slons,  sometimes  leading  to  prostration, and  then respiratory  failure and
death.   The  cats'   body  weights  decreased  by  200-400  g, but probably  from
Inability to eat and drink.
    Grant  (1974)   reported   that  "severe   strlate  keratopathy  developed,
progressing  to chronic edema  of  the cornea, with  vesicles,  bullae and dirty
plgtnented  appearance  of  the  endothellum"   following   Intraocular  use  of  a
benzyl alcohol-preserved saline solution during cataract surgery 1n humans.
    In  a comparative  study  of  the Irrltancy  of  synthetic perfumes  to the
skin  of  animals  and  humans,  Motoyoshl  et  al.  (1979) found   that  benzyl
alcohol  (>97%  pure) had little  or  no Irritation  response  In  guinea  pigs or
miniature  swine,  but was moderately Irritating  to  rabbits when  applied at
100%  concentration;  In humans,   benzyl  alcohol   was  mildly  Irritating  when
applied  to  the  skin  In  a  32%  solution In  acetone.    In  these tests,  no
correlation  was  found between the  animal and  human tests  for the synthetic
perfumes.
0269d
-32-
11/01/89

-------
    HypersensHWIty  reactions  In  humans  have  been  reported  after   the
parenteral administration  of  Injectable drugs or  diluents  containing  benzyl
alcohol  as  a  bacteMostatlc  agent.   Grant  et  al.   (1982)  noted  that  a
55-year-old  man  showed  symptoms  Including sudden  onset  of fatigue,  nausea
and diffuse  angloedema following an  Intramuscular Injection of vitamin  B,?
that contained benzyl  alcohol  as  a preservative.  A skin  test  consisting of
Intracutaneous  Injections  of   vitamin  B12, with  and  without benzyl alcohol
(0.9%) as a  preservative,  and  saline with  benzyl  alcohol  revealed  a positive
wheal-and-flare  response  only to  the  solutions  containing benzyl  alcohol.
Signs  of  an  allergic  dermatitis  (erythema,   palpable   edema and  raised
borders)  were seen  In  a  46-year-old  woman  treated with  sodium  tetradecyl
sulfate, formulated with 1% benzyl alcohol  (Shmunes, 1984).  A  patch test of
5%  benzyl  alcohol  In  petrolatum  showed a  moderately  severe response at  48'
hours, while a patch test  of  the  Injectable treatment  solution  containing IX
benzyl  alcohol  was negative.   In  another   case,  a 49-year-old  male patient
developed a  hypersensH1v1ty  reaction  characterized by fever  and  a maculo-
papular  rash on the chest and arms  after receiving three  different  Injec-
tions  for antlneoplastlc  chemotherapy, all  preserved with benzyl alcohol
(Wilson et al., 1986).   The sensitivity was also confirmed with  skin testing.
    Contact  allergies   have   also  been reported  following  use  of  benzyl
alcohol-containing topical  solutions  or creams.   A 36-year-old woman and  a
43-year-old man developed  contact dermatitis  at  the  site  of application  of a
perfume  and   an  aftershave lotion,  respectively,  both  of which  contained
benzyl alcohol  (Fisher,  1975).   Both  patients responded  positively  to patch
tests  with   1%  benzyl   alcohol  In  petrolatum,   but negatively  to  scratch,
Intradermal  and  subcutaneous   Injections   of  1% benzyl  alcohol In  saline.
0269d                               -33-                             11/01/89

-------
Allergic reactions were  also reported  In  a  44-year-old white woman  using  a
sunscreen (Edwards, 1981),  a  46-year-old  woman being treated with  a  topical
cortlcosterold (Lazzarlnl,  1982) and  a  41-year-old  Japanese  woman prescribed
a  cream  for  tinea   pedls   {Shojl,   1983).    In  all  cases,  the  solutions
contained benzyl  alcohol,  and  all  patients  had  a positive  reaction to  a
patch  test   with  benzyl  alcohol  In  petrolatum.   In  a  study  of  allergic
reactions to a  number  of  perfume Ingredients,  4 of  242  patients  reacted
positively to a benzyl alcohol skin test (Van Joost et al., 1985).
    Several   reports   describe  toxldty  In  preterm  neonates exposed  Intra-
vascularly  to solutions  that contained  benzyl alcohol  as  a  preservative.
Brown  et al.  (1982)  gave  details of  10  of  16  low  birth weight  Infants
(<1250 g)  who  died  following   exposure  to  bacterlostatlc  normal   saline
containing benzyl alcohol so  that  the amount  of benzyl  alcohol  received  was*
minimally 130  mg/kg/day,  the average was  191  mg/kg/day and the  maximum  was
405 mg/kg/day.  The symptoms  of  toxldty,  seen between  day 2 and 4 of admin-
istration, were  slowly  progressive bradycardla, often with  gasping respira-
tion  (resulting  In  the  name  "gasping  syndrome"),  seizures,  unresponslveness
and  extremely  depressed   EEGs,   characteristic   of   progressive  metabolic
acldosls.   Gershanlk  et  al.  (1982)  reported  that  10  low  birth  weight  or
premature Infants developed  "gasping  syndrome" following hospltallzatlon  and
exposure to benzyl alcohol through administration of bacterlostatlc saline.
6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY
6.2.1.   Inhalation.   Pertinent  data  regarding carclnogenldty from  Inhala-
tion exposure  to  benzyf alcohol  were  not  located  In the available literature
cited In Appendix A.
6.2.2.   Oral.    In   2-year   toxicology  and   carclnogenesls  studies  using
F344/N  rats  and  B6C3F1  mice  (see  Section  6.1.2.2.), animals were  gavaged  5
0269d
-34-
11/01/89

-------
days/week with  technical-grade benzyl alcohol  (99% pure) suspended  In  corn
oil  to  achieve  concentrations of  0,  200 and 400  mg/kg for  rats  and  0,  100
and  200 mg/kg  for  mice (NTP,  1988).   There was  an Increased  Incidence  of
epithelial  hyperplasla  In   the  forestomachs  of  the  high  dose  male  rats
(control, 0/48; low dose, 0/19; high  dose,  4/50),  and 1/19 low-dose and  1/50
high-dose  male  rats  had  squamous cell  paplllomas  In the  same  tissue.  A
negative  trend  was  seen   1n  the  Incidence  of  adenomas  and  adenomas  or
carcinomas  (combined)  of   the anterior  pituitary   gland  of  female  rats;
vehicle controls had a higher Incidence than the high-dose group.
    There  was  a  slightly   Increased  Incidence  of adenomas  of  the  adrenal
cortex  1n  high-dose  male  mice (control,  0/48; low  dose,  0/44;  high  dose,
3/48;  p=0.044  In  life table and   Incidental  tumor  tests);  despite  the
occurrence  of  this  tumor   being  somewhat  uncommon   historically  In  corn'
oll-gavaged  controls,   the  number  that  occurred  was  within  the  historical
range,  and  therefore  not attributed  to the  compound  treatment.  There was a
negative  trend  of  adenomas  of the  Harderlan  gland  In male  mice, but  the
Incidences  In  the  dosed  groups were  not  significantly  different  from  the
vehicle controls.
6.2.3.   Other Relevant Information.   Pertinent data regarding the  carclno-
genldty from other routes  of  exposure to  benzyl alcohol  were not  located In
the available literature cited 1n  Appendix A.
6.3.   MUTAGENICITY
    Benzyl alcohol  has  been tested for mutagenlclty  and  clastogenlclty  In a
number  of assay systems.  In  a  short-term  mutagenlclty  test  used by the NTP,
benzyl  alcohol  (99.8% pure)  was assayed  at  a minimum of  five  dose levels In
a  prelncubatlon  modification  of  the Salmonella/mammalian  mlcrosome  assay
(Hortelmans  et  al.,   1986).   It  did  not  produce  reverse  mutations  1n


0269d                               -35-                              11/01/89

-------
Salmonella typhlmurlum  strains  TA1535, TA1537,  TA97,  TA98 and TA100  1n  the
presence  or   absence  of   Aroclor   !254-1nduced   rat  and  hamster  metabolic
activating systems.   Similar  results were  reported  for  benzyl  alcohol  (3
oinol/plate) by  Florin et  al.  (1980)  after  testing constituents of  tobacco
smoke  for  mutagenlclty in  four  strains of  S. typhlmurlum with  and  without
S-9  from  Aroclor-lnduced  rats.   Rogan et  al.  (1986) also  reported  that
benzyl alcohol was  not  mutagenlc 1n  two strains  of S.  typhlmurlum  (TA98 and
TA100),  but  the  presence or absence of an activation  system  was not noted.
Ishldate et al.  (1984)  also  found  benzyl alcohol to be negative at  a maximum
dose of  10 mg/plate In reverse mutation assays  using  £.  typhlmurlum strains
7A92, TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA94 and TA98, with and without S-9 activation.
    Benzyl alcohol  was  not mutagenlc  In   E_.  coll  WP2 uvrA.   It  exhibited
antlmutagenlc  activity  1n  a  test  In  £.   col1  WP2  uvrA   (trp~)  pretreated*
with furylfuramlde  (AF-2)  without  a  cytotoxlc effect   In  the  bacteria (1035
jig/m8.  reduced  the   number  of  AF-2-1nduced  trp~  revertants  to  50%),  but
did not  suppress the mutagenlc  activity of N-methyl-N'-nltrd-N-nltrosoguanl-
dine.  However,  In  a rec  assay  using Bacillus subtil Is M45 (rec~  )  and H17
(rec*),  benzyl  alcohol was  found  to  cause  DNA  damage   to  the  organisms
(Kuroda  et al.,   1984;  Yoo,  1986).   In  an experiment  designed  to  determine
the  practicality  of  using  P3478  (pol   A")  E,.   coll.  a  repair-deficient
mutant,  1n  predicting  the  carcinogenic   potential  of  compounds,  benzyl
alcohol  gave  a negative response  at 10-50 pi and  had  reduced toxlclty when
tested with metabolic activation at  10 »i  (Muck et al., 1976).
    In a mlcronucleus  test  conducted In six 8-week-old male ddY mice, benzyl
alcohol  was  administered  In  a  single  Intraperltoneal  Injection  (Hayashl et
al., 1988).   From each mouse,  1000 PCEs were scored at low  and  high power,
and the  number of MNPCEs was  noted.  The ratio of  PCEs to total erythrocytes
02690
-36-
11/01/89

-------
was also  determined.   Concurrent negative and positive  controls,  as  well  as
historical  control  data  from  the  testing  laboratory,  were evaluated  to
determine a  true  spontaneous  level  of  frequencies  of HNPCEs.   Benzyl  alcohol
was negative 1n the  hi  vitro chromosomal aberration  test, meaning  that the
total  Incidence  of  cells  with  aberrations  (Including  gaps)  was  <4.9%.
Ishldate  et  al.  (1988)  also reported  negative  results when  benzyl  alcohol
was tested 1n mammalian cell culture at 1000 yg/mi (9.2 mM) for 48 hours.
    Haters  et  al.   (1982)   found  that  benzyl  alcohol  did  not   Induce  DNA
damage, nor  did It  Inhibit growth of  human  alveolar cells,  A549,  when added
to the medium at <0.5 mM concentration.
    The evidence  for  mutagenlclty  of  benzyl  alcohol  was  equivocal   1n  the
L5178Y  tk\\/tk~ mouse  lymphoma  cell  forward mutation assay (McGregor  et
al., 1988).
6.4.   DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY
    The only Information  available  on  teratogenldty  of  benzyl  alcohol  Is
from  a study  In  chick  embryos  Injected  with  0.01-0.02 mil of  undiluted
benzyl alcohol  either  before Incubation or within the  first  7 days  of Incu-
bation (Duralswaml,  1953).   There were a number  of  embryonic abnormalities,
but  because  many  of  the  treated  embryos  did   not survive  to  day  11  of
Incubation,  and an anatomic  and physiologic maternal-fetal  relationship  1s
lacking,  this test was  judged  unsuitable  for  determining teratogenlc  risk  to
humans.
6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
    Benzyl  alcohol  was  tested  In mice  for  possible  embryotoxlc,  fetotoxlc
and  neonatal  toxic  responses  In  a  study  that  screened  compounds  for
potential  reproductive  hazard (Hazelden,  1983;  Hardln  et  al., 1987).  Fifty
SPF, pregnant  female CD-I  mice,  42-60 days  old at  the start  of  the study,


0269d                               -37-                             11/01/89

-------
were gavaged  with  benzyl  alcohol mixed  1n  distilled water at 750 mg/kg  bw,
the MTD  In  this  strain of mice.  Fifty mice given  only  vehicle  were  used as
controls.  Mice were treated from gestation days  7-14,  the period of  maximum
organogenesls.  Mice were observed  once dally  for  clinical signs and  twice
dally  for  mortality.   Mice that died  were  not necropsled.  Body  weights of
the dams were recorded Initially,  on gestation days 7  (which  determined  the
dally dosage) and 18,  and  on day 3  postpartum.   Pups/litter and  total Utter
weights were  recorded  within  12 hours of parturition  (day 1  postpartum)  and
again  48  hours  later.   Three Indices of reproductive  performance determined
for the  compound  and the concurrent vehicle  control  Included:  reporductlve
Index = number of animals  pregnant/number mated;  gestation Index = number of
pregnancies resulting  In  live  pups/number  of pregnancies;  viability  Index =
number of  pups alive on day 3  post  par turn/number alive  on day 1 postpartum,'
Reproductive  and gestation  Indices  and  mean  gestation  lengths  were  not
significantly different  In treated  and control  mice.   Mean day  18 maternal
body weight was significantly less  In  treated  mice  than  In controls  for both
unadjusted data  (p<0.05)  and  data  adjusted for day 1  postpartum litter size
(p<0.001). Day 3 post  par turn maternal  weight was  less  (p<0.05),  and maternal
body weight  gain over  the treatment period  (gestation  days  7-18) was less
using  both unadjusted  (p<0.05)  and adjusted  data   (p<0.001)  when  comparing
treated  animals  with  the  vehicle  controls.   Differences  from controls
recorded In Utter weight  data  Included  lower  mean  Utter mean pup weight on
day  1  postpartum  (p<0.01);  lower   mean  litter  mean  pup weight on  day  3
postpartum  (p<0.001);  lower mean  litter weight  change  days  1-3 postpartum
(p<0.05);  and lower  mean  Utter mean  pup  weight change  days  1-3 postpartum
(p<0.001).   Signs  of  maternal   toxlclty  Included  Increased  dam mortality,
cyanosis, dyspnea, hypothermia,  behavioral  pathologies  and pHoerectlon.
0269d
-38-
11/01/89

-------
    In  a preliminary,  short-term,  jm  vWo  developmental  toxldty test  In
mice, benzyl  alcohol  was  given a score of  Intermediate  priority classifica-
tion or  "no  decision" when rated according  to  maternal  toxldty relative  to
five  Indices  of  potential  developmental  toxldty,  I.e.,  the proportion  of
pregnant  survivors  that  produced  a Utter  of  at least  one live  born  pup,
average  Utter  size  and  pup  weight at birth,  and average  pup  survival  and
weight gain  to  3 days of age  (York et al.,  1988).   No  other Information  was
given.
6.6.   SUMMARY
    No  Information  was located  regarding  subchronlc or chronic  exposure  to
benzyl alcohol  by Inhalation.  Systemic effects  from a 16-day  gavage  study
using male and  female F344/N  rats  and B6C3F1 mice at doses of  0,  125,  250,
500, 1000 and 2000  mg/kg  given 5 days/week  Included Increased mortality  and-
lethargy  In  both species  at  doses  >1000  mg/kg, mean body weights  18%  lower
than controls  In male  rats  receiving 1000  mg/kg,  unusual  bleeding In  male
rats and  mice at >1000 mg/kg  and  rough hair coats  In  male rats at the  500
and 1000  mg/kg,  In  female rats  at  250 and  500 mg/kg,  In male  mice at  >500
mg/kg and  In  female  mice  at  >1000  mg/kg (NTP,  1988).   No hlstopathologlcal
effects  attributable  to   treatment were  noted   In  either  sex  of either
species.  Effects on  rats and mice from 91-day  treatment  at doses  of 0,  50,
100, 200, 400 and 800 mg/kg  given  5  days/week  were similar to  the shorter-
term experiment.   There  was   Increased mortality  at the  highest  dosage  In
male  rats and  female mice  (and possibly  female rats);  other   deaths  were
attributed to the gavage  procedure.  Signs  of  neurotoxlclty followed dosing
at  800  mg/kg 1n  rats and  mice, but  this   was  considered an acute effect.
Mean body weights of  the  highest  dosage  rats  of  both  sexes and the female
mice receiving >400  mg/kg were slightly  lower  than  those  of controls.   Male


0269d                               -39-                              11/01/89

-------
rats  at  the  800  mg/kg   level  exhibited  hlstopathologlcal  effects  of  the
hippocampus,  thymus,  kidney  and  skeletal  muscle,   as  well   as   unusual
bleeding; female rats at  this  dose also showed necrosis of  the  hippocampus.
No hlstopathologlcal effects attributable to treatment were seen  In the mice.
    Chronic oral  studies  consisted of  103-week gavage  studies  In rats  and
mice (NTP, 1988} and a developmental  toxlclty and  reproduction study  1n mice
by  Hazelden  (1983).   In  the NTP  (1988) study,  rats  and mice of  both  sexes
were given doses  of  0,  200 and 400 mg/kg  and  0,  100 and  200 mg/kg,  respec-
tively,  administered 5  days/week  for 2  years.   Survival  of the  female rats
at  both  dose  levels was  significantly  lower  than that  of vehicle controls.
However,  many  of  the  deaths were  gavage-related  and  not compoundTrelated.
High-dose male  rats  had  a higher  Incidence of  epithelial  hyperplasla of the
forestomach, and  a squamous cell  papllloma was seen In one male  rat  In the*
high- and low-dose groups.   In  female mice, survival 1n the  high-dose group
was significantly higher  than 1n controls  after the  74th week.   Survival did
not  differ  among  other  groups  of  either   sex.   Although  mice were  treated
with  lower  doses  of  benzyl alcohol,  they were  still  the  less  sensitive
species,  since  there were no toxlcologlcally significant effects  even at the
200 mg/kg dose, which produced systemic  effects  In the rats.
    In acute  studies,  rats  died  within 14 days  after  exposure  to 1000 ppm
(4422  mg/m3)  of  benzyl  alcohol  for  8  hours  (Smyth  et a!., 1951).   Single
oral-dose  LD5Qs  1n  animals  range from -1000-2000  mg/kg  (Jenner  et  al.,
1964;  Graham and  Kulzenga,  1945).   The average survival time of  cats was 22
hours  from  one  20 mi application  of  100% benzyl  alcohol  to their  shaved
backs  (Graham  and Kulzenga, 1945).   Cats   have a pronounced sensitivity to
drugs  containing  benzene  rings  Is  due,   In  part,  to  a relative deficiency In
their  ability   to  detoxify xenoblotlcs   by   glucuronlc   add   conjugation
(Wllcke,   1984).   An  acute dermal   ID™  of  <5.0  ml/kg  was  reported  for
0269d
-40-
11/01/89

-------
guinea  pigs  {Jones,  1967).   Benzyl  alcohol  reportedly  causes  severe  eye
problems  following  Us  use 1n  ocular  surgery (Grant, 1974),  dermal  Irrita-
tion  1n  rabbits  and  humans  (Motoyoshl,  1979),  hypersensltlvlty  reactions
(Grant  et  al.,  1982;  Shmunes,  1984;  Wilson  et  al.,  1986)  and  contact
allergies  In  humans  (Fisher,  1975; Edwards,  1981;  Lazzarlnl, 1982;  Shojl,
1983; Van Joost et al., 1985).
    A higher  Incidence  of  preterm  Infant  mortality  resulted  from  Intravascu-
lar and  Intramuscular administration of drugs  containing  benzyl alcohol  as  a
preservative,  so that dosages  averaged 191 mg/kg/day (Brown et al.,  1982).
    No  Information  was  found  regarding  carclnogenlclty  from   Inhalation
exposure  to benzyl  alcohol.   A  2-year gavage  study using  rats and  mice  with
doses of  0,  200 and 400 mg/kg,  and 0,  100 and 200 mg/kg,  respectively,  was
negative for carclnogenlclty under  the conditions of the  study (NTP, 1988).
    Benzyl alcohol  was negative 1n reverse mutation  assays  with  S.  typhl-
murlum.   with  and without  metabolic activating  systems  (Hortelmans  et  al.,
1986; Florin et al., 1980;  Rogan et al.,  1986; Ishldate  et al.,  1984) and In
tests with E_. coll  WP2  uvrA,  but  It caused DNA damage 1n a rec assay with B_.
subtmis  (Kuroda  et al.,  1984;  Yoo,  1986).   It was negative  In  a  micro-
nucleus   test  1n  ddY  mice (Hayashl  et  al.,  1988)  and  In  mammalian  cell
culture   (Ishldate et  al.,  1988).   Benzyl  alcohol did not  Induce  DNA damage
In  human  alveolar  cells  (Waters  et al.,  1982).   In the  mouse  L5178Y/tk*"/-
lympnoma  forward  mutation  assay,  results were  equivocal  (McGregor  et  al.,
1988).
    In a  reproductive and  developmental toxlclty  study,  gavaged doses of 750
mg/kg/day given  to  pregnant  mice  on  gestation  days  7-14 resulted  1n  lower
mean  Utter and  pup weights,  and signs of maternal  toxlclty  Including  lower
mean  body weights  and  Increased  mortality  (Hazelden, 1983;  Hardln  et  al.,
1987).

0269d                               -41-                             11/01/89

-------
                     7.   EXISTING  GUIDELINES AND  STANDARDS
7.1.   HUNAN
    The  Flavor  and  Extract  Manufacturers Association  reported  that  benzyl
alcohol was granted  GRAS  (generally  recognized as  safe)  status  (FEMA,  1965),
and the FDA has approved Us use In food (Opdyke, 1974).
    Because of  reports  of  fatalities  In newborns  weighing <2.5 g  that  had
been  exposed  to  benzyl  alcohol  through bacterlostatlc  solutions  used  for
flushing Intravenous catheters, the  FDA  recommended  1n a  letter to pediatri-
cians,  hospital  pharmacists  and  hospital  administrators,  that  "solutions
used  to flush  intravascular  catheters  or  for  diluting or  reconstituting
medications  In  newborns  not  contain benzyl  alcohol  or  any other  preserva-
tive" (Anonymous, 1982).
7.2.   AQUATIC
    Guidelines  and  standards  for  the  protection  of  aquatic  life  from
exposure  to benzyl  alcohol  were  not  located   In  the available literature
cited In Appendix A.
0269d
-42-
11/01/89

-------
                              8.   RISK ASSESSMENT
8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY
8.1.1.   Inhalation.   Pertinent   data   regarding  the  carclnogenldty   of
benzyl  alcohol  to  animals  or  humans   from  Inhalation  exposure  were  not
located In the available literature cited In Appendix A.
8.1.2.   Oral.  Benzyl alcohol was  negative for carclnogenldty  In  103-week
gavage studies  In rats  at  dosage levels of  200 and  400 mg/kg  administered 5
days/week  (143 and  286 mg/kg/day)  and  In  mice at dosage  levels of  100  and
200 mg/kg (71 and 143 mg/kg/day}  (NTP,  1988).
8.1.3.   Other  Routes.   Pertinent  data  regarding  the  carclnogenldty   of
benzyl alcohol  to  animals  or  humans  from  other routes of exposure  were  not
located In the available literature cited In Appendix A.
8.1.4.   Weight of  Evidence.   No  data  were located  regarding  the  carclno-*
genldty of benzyl alcohol to  humans.   In  a well  designed  and  well  conducted
study, there  was  no  evidence  of carcinogenic  activity  from  benzyl  alcohol
administered  orally  by gavage 5 days/week for 103  weeks  to male  or  female
F344/N rats at doses  of  200 and 400 mg/kg,  or  to male or  female B6C3F1 mice
at doses of 100 and 200 mg/kg  (NTP, 1988),   Applying guidelines for carcino-
genic  risk  assessment adopted by  the  U.S. EPA  (1986b),  benzyl alcohol  Is
assigned to Group E, evidence of  noncarclnogenlclty for humans.
8.1.5.   Quantitative Risk Estimates.
    8.1.5.1.   INHALATION — A complete lack  of  data  precludes estimation
of carcinogenic potency of benzyl alcohol from Inhalation  exposure.
    8.1.5.2.   ORAL — The  only   carclnogenldty  data   located   regarding
benzyl alcohol were  the  negative  gavage  studies In  rats and  mice by  NTP
(1988).  Quantitative estimation  of carcinogenic  potency cannot be  performed
for oral  exposure to benzyl alcohol.


0269d                               -43-                             11/01/89

-------
8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure.
    8.2.1.1.   LESS  THAN  LIFETIME  (SUBCHRONIC)  — Pertinent  data  regarding
the subchronlc Inhalation toxlclty of benzyl alcohol  were  not  located 1n the
available  literature  cited   In  Appendix  A; therefore,  derivation  of an  RfD
for subchronlc Inhalation exposure Is not possible.
    8.2.1.2.   CHRONIC — Pertinent  data  regarding   the  chronic  Inhalation
toxlclty  of benzyl  alcohol  were  not located   In  the available  literature
cited 1n  Appendix  A;  therefore, derivation of an  RfD for  chronic  Inhalation
exposure Is not possible.
8.2.2.   Oral Exposure.
    8.2.2.1.   LESS  THAN  LIFETIME  (SUBCHRONIC)  -- Subchronlc gavage  studies
on mice  and rats  were conducted for 16  days at  dosages of  0,  125,  250,  500,*
1000 and 2000 mg/kg  given 5  days/week  (converted doses:  0, 89,  179, 357, 714
and 1429  mg/kg/day)  and 91  days at  dosages of  0, 50, 100, 200, 400  and 800
mg/kg given 5  days/week  (converted doses: 0,  36,  71,   1435,  286  and  571
mg/kg/day}  (NTP,   1988).   From  the  16-day  study.  Increased  mortality  was
reported  In rats  and mice at  doses of  >1000  mg/kg  (Recs. #13, 16).  Other
signs  of  toxlclty  at  >1000  mg/kg  In  male  rats  Included  decreased  body
weights,  lethargy, hemorrhaglng under  the skin  and blood  In  the urinary and
GI  tracts  (Rec.  #13).  At dosages  of  >500 mg/kg  (LOAEL)  1n male  rats  (Rec.
#14) and >250 mg/kg  (LOAEL)  1n  female  rats (Rec. #17), rough hair  coats  were
observed.   No  effects  were  seen  1n males at  doses  <250  or  In  females  at
doses  <125  rag/kg  (NOAELs)   (Recs.   #15,   18).    Systemic  effects   1n  mice
Included  Increased mortality at dosages  >1000  mg/kg (Rec.  #19),  and  lethargy
and rough  hair  coats  In males  at  dose  levels >500 mg/kg  (LOAEL)  (Rec.  #20)
and 1n  females  at dose  levels  >1000 mg/kg (Rec.  #22).  The  highest dosages
0269d
-44-
11/01/89

-------
were associated wHh blood  In  the  urinary  bladder  In  both  sexes.   No  effects
were seen  In  male  mice at doses <250 mg/kg  or  In  female mice at  doses  <5QO
mg/kg (NOAELs) (Recs. #21, 23).
    In the 91-day study, adverse effects In  the  brain (hippocampus),  thymus,
kidney and skeletal muscle  1n  male  rats were reported at 800 mg/kg (Rec.  #3)
but  not  at  lower  doses.   Female  rats exhibited the  same effect  on  the
hippocampus at the  same  dose  level (Rec.  #4).  Eight of 10  male rats  In  the
800 mg/kg  dose  group died, with  four  deaths judged  to be accidental;  there
were  two  deaths   In  the  female  rats  at  this dosage  level,  with  one  death
attributed to  the  gavage procedure.  Rats of both sexes exhibited signs  of
neurotoxklty following  dosing wHh >800  mg/kg.   At  this  dose level,  some
decrease  1n  final  mean  body  weights  was  seen  In  both  sexes, as  well  as
hlstopathologlcal effects  In  males, Including  necrosis  In  the  hippocampus,'
skeletal  muscle  necrosis,  thymlc  atrophy  and  kidney  nephrosls.   At  the  400
mg/kg dose  level  (LOAEL),  female  rats  had final mean body  weights 9% lower
than  those  of  controls  (Rec.  #5).    Effects   In mice  Included   Increased
mortality  1n  females  at the highest dosage  and  some decrease In  final  mean
body weights  of  females  given  >400 mg/kg  (Rec.  #9).   At the highest  dosage,
mice of both sexes exhibited signs of  neurotoxlclty following dosing.
    In the 91-day  study,  a NOAEL of 143 mg/kg/day (200 mg/kg administered 5
days/week)  (Rec.  #2)  was  Identified  for  female  rats, which were the  more
sensitive  sex.   Applying an uncertainty factor  of 100 (10  for  Interspedes
extrapolation multiplied  by 10  to protect  unusually sensitive  Individuals)
results In an RfD for subchronlc  oral  exposure  of 1.43 mg/kg/day, which  Is
rounded to 1  mg/kg/day.
    Confidence  In  the  key study  Is  high,  with effects   occurring  In  a
dose-related manner.  Therefore, confidence In the  subchronlc RfD 1s  high.


0269d                               -45-                             11/01/89

-------
    8.2.2.2.   CHRONIC — Chronic  gavage  studies  were  conducted  for  103
weeks on rats  and  mice at dosage  levels  of  0,  200 and 400 mg/kg  and  0,  100
and   200   mg/kg,   respectively,   administered   5  days/week   {NTP,   1988).
Converted dosages  calculated  by  multiplying  by 5  (number  of  doses/week)  and
dividing by  7  (days/week) are:  for  rats, 0, 143  and 286 mg/kg/day and  for
mice, 0, 71 and 143 mg/kg/day.   A  dosage of  400 mg/kg (LOAEL) was  associated
with  an  Increased  Incidence  of  hyperplasla  of  the epithelium of  the  fore-
stomach  In  male  rats  (Rec. #11),  with no effects  observed  In males at  the
lower dose  of  200  mg/kg  {Rec.  #12).   Both  the  200 (Rec. #1)  and  400  mg/kg
doses  were associated  with  Increased  mortality   In  female   rats,  but  the
ultimate cause of  death  remains  In  doubt.   Deaths  of many  female rats  In
both  dosage  groups (low  dose,  17; high  dose,  13),  but  of  only one  In  the
control  group,  were  attributed  to   accidental   causes,  I.e.,  the  gavage'
procedure.    NTP  (1988),  however,  concluded that  administration  of  benzyl
alcohol  reduced  the  survival   of dosed  female  rats.   There Is  no  firm
evidence that  the  mortality was or  was  not  associated with  the chemical  or
with  a  combined effect  of the  chemical  and  the method  of  administration.
Therefore,   the LOAEL of  286  mg/kg/day for  male  rats was Identified as  the
appropriate dose from which an  RfO  can  be  derived (Rec.  #11).  Applying an
uncertainty factor  of 10 to  extrapolate from rats to  humans,  10  to protect
unusually  sensitive   Individuals  and  10  to extrapolate  from  a  LOAEL to  a
NOAEL results  1n a chronic oral RfD  of  0.286 mg/kg/day,  which Is  rounded to
0.3 mg/kg/day.
0269d
11/01/89

-------
                           9.   REPORTABLE  QUANTITIES
9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
    The  toxlclty  of  benzyl  alcohol  was  discussed  In Chapter  6 and  dose-
response data  are  summarized  In Table 9-1.  The  data  available  for  deriving
CSs are  from  chronic  and subchronlc gavage  studies  (NTP,  1988)  and  a repro-
ductive  toxlclty  study  by  Hazelden  (1983).   In  the  chronic oral  studies,
groups of  50  male  and 50 female  F344/N  rats and B6C3F1  mice  were gavaged
with benzyl alcohol at dosages of 0, 200  and  400 mg/kg,  and 0,  100 and  200
mg/kg, respectively,   5  days/week  for  103  weeks.   In  the  91-day  studies,
groups of  10  F344/N   rats  and  86C3F1  mice of  each  sex  were  gavaged  with
benzyl alcohol at dosages of 0,  50,  100,  200,  400 and 800 mg/kg 5 days/week.
Survival  decreased  In  female rats  at  chronic  exposures of >200  mg/kg  for  2
years and  In male rats exposed  to 800 mg/kg for  91 days.   Although Increased4
mortality was observed  In the  male  and  female  rats at the higher dose It was
not  specifically  attributed to  the chemical  and may  have  been due to  the
gavage administration  procedure.  High-dose  male  rats  had  a  higher Incidence
of  epithelial  hyperplasla  of   the  forestomach  compared  with the  controls.
Other  effects  observed  In  male  rats  given  800 mg/kg  for 91 days  were
necrosis  of the dentate gyrus  of the hippocampus,  skeletal  muscle necrosis,
thymlc congestion,  hemorrhage,  and  atrophy  and nephrosls  of   the kidney.
Necrosis  of the dentate  gyrus  of the hippocampus  was also observed  In female
rats at  this  dosage level.   A dosage of  400 mg/kg 1n  rats and  800  mg/kg In
mice, given S  days/week  for  91  days,  was associated with decreased mean body
weights.    No   signs  of  toxlclty were  observed   In  the mice  at  the dosage
levels eliciting  toxic effects  In  the  rat, Indicating that  rats may be the
more sensitive species.
0269d                               -47-                             11/01/89

-------























"o
o
«

>>
Isl
g
CO
U
.— e
t u-
an
>»
UJ •***
_» «-
O3 CJ
<« «-
1— X
o
^•^

41
Ol
19
>
3
19
^
0




























4)
U
C
a>
t^
41
1^
4>
oe





4>
Irt
i
v»
O>
ee.



•019 — .
4) 4l >>
E v» <9
b. O -O
o a ^
<*- o»
VI C .tt
c m v
<9 E O>
£:££

ja
•O 4> — -
41 VI >i
E e 19
i- O •O
o -v
u- •— o>
vt n ^
SJ "5,
££.§



o>
L. •""*
a en
VI Jf
g.01
s-f
ItJ IMT


>l
4^
U
3
^L

•V i—
0) 19
t— U 4>
t^ «- 4-1
4- VI 19
.C >>4->
» -C 6/>
» Q.

4»4->
19 £ ~^
k en o»
41 •- -K
5S~



o
M
4)
«/»


•v,
VI C
4) —
4— 19
M b
s**
CL(/>
CO
00
03
O>

»
Q.
»—
X


4>
f 4)
4«* JC
4-»
4-
O M-
o
19 .e
— E w
vn 3 *
CX 41 *<
t- « m
41 ** 4>
Q.— 1_
>i Q. 0
Z D X-


10
LO
^^
IO



10
eo
CM



j<:
0>
SVI
J<
•s. oi
VI 4>
>1 *
•So
o
in •—
o u
O 0
•* H-


$
W


F"
*•
o

c
K_
o
u



^_
*
o



o
IO
i



z
>«, *
^s
ecu.
OS
CD
en
•^
A
Q.
H-
Z
X
en u-
O
IS*
•" 4)
JZ vi
o> o
•- f
«:
>»9
•O f vi
O  "c
4) O O
K •— u


«r>
o
<£
n



IO
s



15
|JS
VI 4>
I"8
en
Lrt t—
e L_
o o
^r u-


35
en


^
•f"
o

c
5
u



^
O



O
^^
U_




•*^
X» *
1SS
OC u.
00
eo
on
^
.
eu
>—
u*
o >•
£
VI 0.
•^ o
VI l_
CD e <->
r— l_ 10
u u
trt 4> *
ICS
^vTtS
19— % E
•^ 1A U >l
a) o o f
^~ t» Q. •**
ttP U Q.
.* 
Sv,
•X Jf
u> 4>
>> e
CO u-
o
VI
f 4)
«s
— .c
«:
>l 19
•O £• vi
O *< i—
A O
b. l_
C 41 4^
19 3 e
at e o
Z i- u


CM
CO
09
n




r^
kn



^
41
41
* v>
X. n
vi a>
>• 0)
>9 S
"^M
10 r—
O t-
0 0
00 o-


X
en
on



^
o

e
i»
o
o


rM

4-1
4^


VI
C •"
19 JT
8.
41
?*
VI Q.
ffl 3
0> Q.
k-
U V
0) C
O (0


o
*
(D
Ut



o
U1
p-h.


*9*
f-W
I
r»»
1A C
»» O
ng «~
-Q **
"0
k- *^
O Vi
u. o>
sT
r~ O


ee
z


•a
u

^~
•^ i.
4-> 41
VI 4-i
*- f9
TS *


CO
C*J
e
C3



S
^


-7
•x a
41 U
VI
gs
X (/)




































^^
£
en
J
>i
•^•y
£

^9




t_
«*-

1
<9
3
U
<9
U
VI
4)
en
«
^
41
>
IB
•ei
41
£
O<
4>
X
1
I
H—
IB







































*
s»
X
19
^
f*.

<9

W
at
>
o
a>
I

a>
^
4-1
O
c
^
c
IB
O.
K
41
S
•o
41
19
9
<-»
2
<0












eo
••x

--*
O)
^
o
r**
.b*
^
Dl
(U

>Y
•o
o
-O
i
.c
a>
u
c
fl*
fe
a>
«*w
*
fa.
>^_
e>
jf.
4-1
f
o>
S
>t
"O
o
JOt

1
G>
<5
b^
X
>>
(O
ig
%k
W
,M
I


41
01
IB
VI
O
^
I

c
19
i
b-
O
M-
VI
C
IB
i.
..
cz
o


l_
O
&
4>
b
4-»
o
£
a
ee
z
0269d
-48-
11/01/89

-------
    In  the  study  by Hazelden (1983), a  dosage  of 750 mg/kg/day administered
by gavage  to  pregnant  CD-I  mice for  gestation  days  7-14 was associated with
decreased  mean litter  and  pup weights,  maternal  toxlclty and  mortality.
Although mortality  was  observed In  these  mice, the deaths  were a  result of
acute exposure to a high dose In this strain.
    Table  9-1  summarizes the  toxlclty  data of  benzyl  alcohol.   Table  9-2
presents the  CSs  and  RQs  derived associated  with each effect  presented In
Table 9-1.   The guidelines  for  calculation of a chronic toxlclty  RQ  (U.S.
EPA, 1984)  recommend  the  use of chronic data,  If  adequate.   Hence  the  RQ of
1000 associated  with  Increased  hyperplasla  of  the  epithelium  of  the  fore-
stomach  In  male  rats  Is most  appropriately chosen  to  represent  the chronic
toxlclty of benzyl alcohol  (Table 9-3).
9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY
    As  reviewed  In Chapter  6,  cardnogenlclty  data  for benzyl alcohol  are
limited to  gavage studies In rats  and mice conducted for the NTP (1988).   In
this study  there was  an  Increase In  tumors of  the adrenal cortex  In male
mice (3/48  high  dose  vs.  0/48 control;  p=0.044 In life table and  Incidental
tumor tests).  Although 3/48 was considered  by  NTP to be within the range of
historical   controls,  these  results  should be  considered  equivocal evidence
of carcinogenic activity  rather  than negative.   It  1s  suggested,  therefore,
based on U.S.  EPA (1986)  guidelines   that  benzyl  alchol  could be assigned to
Group  0.    Since  potency  factors  cannot  be  derived  for  this chemical,  a
hazard ranking based on carclnogenclty 1s not possible for this  compound.
0269d                               -49-                             11/01/89

-------




























CM
1
O>
LU
i
CD

1—








































0
f*
0
(J

^

"^
M
dl
00
•o
d)
.
0>
-,
c
XJ

^^
f 	
rO
O
t-
o
<4>»

(/I
O)
fct»
o
U
(/t
ei
T»

t/i
o
t
o















0>
c
£
a>
»*-
0)
Q£


o-
OS

CO




CD
>
06







*•»
Ol
LU



•

•o
Q£




Q ,--
UJ >>
3: re
•o
e "x
|f

Ol «/» >»
E o w
i_ ^3 w
0 -N.

si<
(O «^" CJ5
L. C E

V.
wi e
cu «-

w f
a> -**
a. to
CO
00
oo
a>
"~
•
Q.
(—


0
0
0

10





10




_c a>
-M 4.ZH
<^J
^4~
0 <*-
o
«J £
*"• E *>j
w> 3 na
a. 
t- -C I/I
QJ ^^ d>
Q.-C- L.
>» O. O
31 Q> u»


r—






CM
«
in
o
CO


vO
. CO
CM




^»
s^
•S^ ^*i
^-* ^f
rO CO
of LU-
GO en 00
CO CO CO
CT> 0^ 0v
<— •— i—
» •> *
a. a, a.
i— i— i—


00 0
O O 0
00 O
in •— m

CO iQ CO





CO \O CO



.
 cu v> 3 -*j a>
X:M a> o • E x: i^
O) O r~ 1_ (/I >) D> O
••- JC Uu3f i-jC
» trt 3CE*" .»""»«
c r— g ra u- e !•—
^% t rO O
TUjCl- r- vi O TJjCl-
O -!-• -»-" ro«-ca>« O-fc>-«->
-Q C <4^ oo CXjC jQ C
i_o ajo-r-a. i_ o
c a>  o
rO 2 O o L- ro ^
d> O f Qj 14^ ^J* C^| O I4»
^ r— o CO C O rO SIi— O


r- 'r-






O CM lO
• • «
co en en
CM in i—
in oo r»
CM in CM


\£> ,— r—
GO r— r-
CM in in




^E j^ x^ ^~
"•v "V. 41 U_
V. ^ "V «» to CO
-M «*• *J ^f 3 (_>
^3 CO ^9 CO C) uO
Of U. Q£ U- E OO
c"
o
5
a> co
IM CO
ffl OH


o
o
0

oo





oo







c ex
rO 3
o> ex
T3
T3 C.
to in
f8 L- **
CD 0> jE
O *J> «r-
0> ««* CD
O r— 5


_






O

vtO
CO
O


o
m
p^



t
"s. Q
0) O
VI
3 U.
O Q.
•C co
o>

o
r~*
(Q

o
u-
rg
•o
t
c
UJ
to
to
o>

ex

0>
o
**
D>
->^
o


^
VH.I
di
'a.
•4-)
^Z
3

i
0)
!a

i—
e
Q
U.


*^
^^
•o
0>
H
I
4)
0
•o
^
C
0)
3
• ft)
c'
r0
E
3
2C i
*
                                                                      il
0269d
-50-
11/01/89

-------
                                  TABLE 9-3
                                Benzyl  Alcohol
                              (CAS No.  100-51-6)
          Minimum  Effective Dose  (MED) and Reportable Quantity (RQ)
Route:                  oral,  gavage
Species/sex:             rat/male
Dose*:                  3605 mg/day
Duration:                103 weeks
Effect:                 Increased  hyperplasla of  the epithelium of  the  fore-
                        stomach compared with controls
RVd:                    1
RVe:                    6
CS:                     6
RQ:                     1000
Reference:              NTP, 1988
*Equ1valent human dose
0269d                               -51-                             11/01/89

-------
                                10.  REFERENCES

Albalges,  0.,   F.  Casado  and  F.   Ventura.   1986.   Organic  Indicators  of
groundwater pollution by a sanitary landfill.   Water Res.   20:  1153-1159.

Anonymous.  1982.  Benzyl  alcohol  may be toxic to  newborns.   FDA  Drug  Bull.
12{2): 10-11.

Applegate,  V.C.,  J.W.   Howell,  A,E.  Hall,   Jr.   and   M.A.   Smith.    1957.
Toxlclty  of  4346 chemicals  to  larval  lampreys and fishes.  Spec. S1.  Rep.
F1sh. No. 207.   Fish W1ldl. Serv. USDI, Washington,  DC.   p. 1-9,  34-35.

Atkinson, R.   1985.   Kinetics and  mechanisms  of  the gas  phase  reactions  of'
the  hydroxyl  radical with  organic compounds  under atmospheric  conditions.
Chem. Rev.  85: 69-75; 185-193.

Balba, M.T.H.,  E.  Senior and D.B.  Nedwell.   1981.   Anaerobic metabolism  of
aromatic  compounds   by  mlcroblal  associations   Isolated   from   saltmarsh
sediment.  Blochem.  Soc. Trans.   9: 230-231.

Belly,  R.T.  and  C.T.  Goodhue.   1976.  A  radloresplrometrlc technique  for
measuring  the  blodegradatlon of specific  components In a  complex effluent.
In.: Proc. Int.  Blodegrad. Symposium, 3rd ed.   p. 1103-1107.
Bray, H.G., W.V. Thorpe and  K.  White.   1951.   Kinetic studies of the metabo-
lism  of  foreign organic  compounds.   1. The  formation of benzole  acid  from
benzamlde, toluene, benzyl alcohol  and  benzaldehyde  and Its  conjugation  with
glyclne and glucuronlc acid In the rabbit.  Blochem.  J.  48:  88-96.
02690
-52-
11/01/89

-------
Bray,  H.G.,  S.P.  James  and W.V.  Thorpe.   1958.   Metobllsm of some  omega-

halogenoalkylbenzenes and  related  alcohols  In the  rabbit.   Blochem.  J.   70:

570-579.



Brlggs,  G.G.   1981.   Adsorption  of  pesticides  by  some  Australian  soils.

Aust. J. Soil  Res.  19:  61-68.


                                                 »
Brown, H.J., N.R.  Bulst,  H.T.  Glpson,  R.K.  Huston  and  N.G.  Kennaway.   1982.

Fatal benzyl alcohol  poisoning In a neonatal  Intensive care  unit.   Lancet.

1: 1250.



CAS  (Chemical  Abstracts  Service).   1989.   Registry  file  database.   Online

02/28/89.



Chambers C.W., H.H.  Tabak and P.M.  Kabler.   1963.  Degradation of  aromatic

compounds by  phenol  adapted bacteria.   J.  Water  Pollut.  Control  Fed.   35:

1517-1528.



Chemllne.  1989.   National  Library of Medicine,  Chemllne  database.   Online

02/23/89.



Claus,  D  and  N.  Walker.   1964.   The decomposition  of   toluene  by  soil

bacteria.  J.  Gen. H1crob1ol.  36: 107-122.



Coleman, E.C.,  C.  Ho and  S.S.  Chang.  1981.   Isolation  and Identification of

volatile compounds from baked potatoes.   J.  Agrlc. Food  Chem.  29:  42-48.
0269d                               -53-                             11/01/89

-------
Crockett, P.W.,  EL  K111an,  K.S.  Crump  and R.B.  Howe.   1985.   Descriptive
methods  for  using  data from dissimilar  experiments  to locate a  no-adverse-
toxlc-effects region In the dose-duration plane.   Prepared by  K.S.  Crump  and
Company,  Inc.,  under   Contract  No.  6807-007  for  Environmental Criteria  and
Assessment Office,  U.S. EPA, Cincinnati,  OH.

Culllson, R.F.,  P.O.  Mernard and W.B. Buck.   1983.   Toxicosis In  cats  from
use  of  benzyl  alcohol  In lactated  ringer's  solution.   J.  Am.  Vet.  Med.
Assoc.  182: 61.

Dagon,  T.J.   1973.  Biological  treatment of photo processing  effluents.   3.
Hater Pollut. Control  Fed.  45:  2123-2135.
                                                                            %
Dawson,  G.W.,  A.L.  Jennings, D.  Drozdowskl  and E. Rider.   1977.   The acute
toxlclty  of  47 Industrial chemicals  to  fresh and salt water  fishes.   Mater
Waste Manage. Sect. Battelle-Northwest.  J.  Hazard. Mater.  1(4):  303-318.

Dlack,  S.L. and  H.B. Lewis.  1928.   Studies In  the synthesis of  hypanlc add
In the animal organism.  J. Blol.  Chem.  77: 89-95.

Dore, M., N.  Brunei and B. Legube.   1975.   Participation of various  organic
compounds  In  the evaluation of  global pollution  criteria.   Trlb.  Cebedeau.
28: 3-11.  (Fre.)

Dorfman,  L.M., and G.E. Adams.  1973.  Reactivity of  the  hydroxyl radical In
aqueous  solution.   National Bureau of Standards,  Washington,  DC.  p. 18-31.
MSRD-NBS-46.  NTIS COM-73-50623.
0269d
-54-
11/01/89

-------
Draper  W.H.  and  D.G.  Crosby.   1983.   The  photochemical  generation  of
hydrogen  peroxide  In  natural  waters.   Arch.  Environ. Contam.  Toxlcol.   12:
121-126.

Oumont, J.P.  and J.  Adda.   1978.   Occurrence of sesqulterpenes  In  mountain
cheese volatlles.  J. Agrlc. Food Chem.  26: 364-367.

Ouralswaml,  P.K.  1953.   Experimental  teratogenesls with  benzyl  alcohol.
Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp.  95: 57-67.

Durkln, P.  and  W.  Heylan.   1988.   User's  Guide for  D2PLOT:  A  program for
dose/duration  graphs.    Prepared  by  Chemical  Hazard  Assessment  Division,
Syracuse  Research  Corporation  under  Contract  No.  68-C8-0004 for  Environ-*
mental Criteria and Assessment Office, U.S.  EPA, Cincinnati,  OH.

Edwards,  E.K.,  Jr.    1981.    Allergic   reactions  to  benzyl  alcohol  1n  a
sunscreen.  Cutls.   28: 332-333.

Elchbaum,   F.H.  and W.J. Yasaka.   1976.  Antlarrhythmlc effect of  solvents:
Propylene glycol, benzyl alcohol.  Basic Res.  Cardlol.  71: 355-370.

E1senre1ch,  S.J.,  B.B.  Looney  and  J.D.  Thornton.   1981.   Airborne  organic
contaminants  of  the  Great  Lakes  ecosystem.  Environ. Scl.  Technol.   15(1):
30-38.

Ellis,  D.D.,  C.M.  Jones,  R.A.  Larson  and  D.J.  Schaeffer.    1982.   Organic
constituents  of mutagenlc   secondary  effluents  from  wastewater  treatment
plants.  Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxlcol.  11:  373-382.

0269d                               -55-                             11/01/89

-------
FEMA  (Flavor  and   Extract  Manufacturers  Association).   1965.   Survey  of
flavoring  Ingredient  usage  levels.   No.  2137.   Food  Techno!.,  Champaign.
19(2): 155.

Fisher,  A.A.   1975.  Allergic  paraben  and  benzyl alcohol  hypersensltlvlty
relationship  of  the delayed  and Immediate  varieties.   Contact  Dermatitis.
1: 281-284.

Florin,  I,,  L.  Rutberg,  M.  Curvall  and  C.R.  Enzell.   1980.   Screening  of
tobacco   smoke  constituents    for   mutagenlclty  using   the   Ames1   test.
Toxicology.  18:  219-232.

Fluck,  E.,  L.A.  Polrler  and  H.W.   Ruellus.   1976.    Evaluation of  a  DNA*
polymerase deficient mutant  of £. coVl  for  the rapid  detection  of  carclno-
genesls.  Chem. Blol.  Interact.  15:  219-231.

Gershanlk, J.,  B.   Boeder,  H.  Ensley,  S.   McCloskey and  H. George.   1982.
The gasping  syndrome  and benzyl  alcohol  poisoning.   N. Engl.  J.  Hed.   307:
1384-1388.

Gossett, R.W., D.A. Brown  and  D.R.  Young.   1983.  Predicting the bloaccumu-
latlon  of  organic  compounds In  marine  organisms  using  octanol/water  parti-
tion coefficients.   Mar. Pollut. Bull.  14:  387-392.

Graham,  8.E.  and M.H.  Kluzenga.   1945.   Toxlclty  studies  on  benzyl  benzoate
and related benzyl  compounds.   J. Pharmacol.  Exp. Ther.   84:  358-362.
0269d
-56-
11/01/89

-------
Grant, W.M.  1974.  Toxicology of the eye.  In: Effects of  Drugs, Chemicals,
Plants and Venoms, 2nd ed.   Charles  C.  Thomas,  Springfield,  IL.   p.  184-185.

Grant,  J.A.,   P.A.   Bllodeau,   B.G.   Guernsey  and  F.H.  Gardner,   1982.
Unsuspected benzyl alcohol  hypersensHWHy.   N. Engl.  J.  Med.   306:  108.

Gruber, C.M.  19?3.   The pharmacology  of  benzyl  alcohol and Us esters.   I.
The effect of benzyl  alcohol,  benzyl  acetate and  benzyl  benzoate when given
by mouth upon the blood pressure, pulse and alimentary  canal.   J. Lab. Clln.
Med.  9: 15-33.

Gruber, C.M.  1924.  The pharmacology of benzyl alcohol and Us  esters.   IV.
The diuretic effect  of benzyl alcohol, benzyl  acetate and benzyl  benzoate.'
J. Lab. CUn. Med.  10: 284-294.

Hampton, C.V.,  W.R.  Plerson, T.M.  Harvey,  M.S.  Updegrove  and R.S.  Marano.
1982.   Hydrocarbon gases emitted from vehicles on  the road.   1. A  qualita-
tive  gas  chromatography/mass  spectrometry  survey.   Environ.  Scl.  Techno!.
16: 287-298.

Hansch, C.  and  A.J.  Leo.    1985.   Medchem Project.   Issue  No. 19.   Pomona
College, Claremont, CA.

Hardln, B.D.,   R.L.  Schuler,  J.R.  Burg,  et   al.   1987.    Evaluation of  60
chemicals   In a  preliminary developmental  toxlclty  test.  Terat.  Carcinogen.
Mutagen.  7: 29-48.
0269d                               -57-                             11/01/89

-------
Harmsen 3.   1983.   Identification  of  organic compounds  In  leachate from  a
waste tip.  Water Res.  17: 699-705.

Hayashl,  M.f  M.  Klshl,  T.  Sofunl  and  M.  Ishldate Jr.   1988.   Mlcronucleus
tests In  mice  on 39 food additives and  eight  miscellaneous  chemicals.   Food
Chem. Toxlcol.  26: 487-500.

Hazelden,  K.P.   1983.   Screening of priority  chemicals  for  potential  repro-
ductive hazard.   NIOSH,  Public  Health  Service,  U.S.  Department of  Health,
Education and Welfare, Cincinnati, OH.   Contract  No.  210-81-6005.  135 p.

Hendry, D.G, T.  Hill,  L.  Plszklewlcz,  J.A.  Howard and  H.K.  Elgenmann.   1974.
A critical review  of  the  H  atom  transfer In the  liquid phase:  Chlorine  atom,'
alkyl,  trlchloromethyl,  alkoxy  and alkylperoxy  radicals.  3.  Phys.  Chem.
Ref. Data.  3: 937-978.

H1ne, 3.  and  P.K.  Mookerjee.   1975.  The  Intrinsic hydrophlllc  character  of
organic compounds.   Correlations In terms  of structural  contributions.   3.
Org. Chem.  40: 292-298.

Ho,  C.,  K.N.  Lee  and  Q.Z.  31n.   1983.   Isolation  and Identification  of
volatile  flavor compounds In fried bacon.  J.  Acrlc.  Food Chem.  31: 336-342.

Hollls, E.H.  and  R.E.  Lennon.   1954.  Ihe   toxlclty of  1085  chemicals  to
fish.   F1sh Toxlclty  Report No.  2.   U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services, Depart-
ment of the Interior, Leetown, WV.  (Cited In Ltpnlck et a!., 1985)
0269d
-Se-
/01/89

-------
Horowitz, A.,  D.R.  Shelton,  C.P.  Cornell and J.M. Tledje.   1982.   Anaerobic
degradation  of aromatic  compounds   In  sediment and  digested  sludge.   Dev.
Ind. Mlcroblol.  23: 435-444.

Ishldate, M.J., T.  Sofunl, K. Yoshlkawa,  et  al.   1984.   Primary  mutagenlclty
screening of  food additives  currently  used 1n  Japan.   Food Chem.  Toxlcol.
22: 623-636.

Ishldate,  M.,  Jr..  M.C.  Harnols   and  T.  Sofunl.    1988.    A   comparative
analysis of data  on the clastogenldty  of 951  chemical  substances  tested  In
mammalian cell cultures.  Mutat.  Res.  195:  151-213.

James, R.H.,  R.E.  Adams,  J.M. Flnkel,  H.C.  Miller and L.D. Johnson.   1984.-
Evaluation of analytical methods for the  determination of  POHC 1n  combustion
products,  in: Proc. 77th Ann. Mtg.  Air  Polutlon  Control  Assoc.,  June 24-29,
1984, San Francisco, CA.  J.  A1r  Pollut. Control Assoc.   p. 1-25.

Jenner,  P.M.,  E.C.  Hagan,  J.M.  Taylor,  E.L.  Cook and O.G.  Fltzhugh.   1964.
Food flavorings and compounds of related  structure.   I.  Acute  oral  toxlclty.
Food Cosmet. Toxlcol.   2:  327-343.

Jones,  H.H.   1967.   Toxlclty  and  health  hazard summary.   Laboratory  of
Industrial  Medicine,  Eastman Kodak  Co., Rochester,   NY.   (CHed  In  Opdyke,
1973}
0269d                               -59-                             11/01/89

-------
Kaiser, K.L.E., V.S. PalabMca and J.M. Rlbo.  1987.  Qsar  of  acute  toxldty
of mono-substituted benzene  derivations  to photobacterlum  phosphoreum.  |n:
QSAR In Environmental  Toxicology - II.  Proc 2nd  Inter. Workshop  on  Environ.
Toxlcol. Hamilton,  Ont.,  Canada, K.L.E.  Kaiser,  Ed.  0.  Reldel  Publ. Co.,
Boston, MA.  p. 153-168.

Keith,   L.H.   1976.   Identification  of   organic  compounds   In  unbleached
treated Kraft paper mill wastewaters.  Environ.  Sc1. Techno!.   10: 555-564.

Klmura, E.T.,  T.O. Darby  R.A.  Krause and  H.D.  Brondyk.    1971.  Parenteral
toxldty studies with  benzyl  alcohol.  Toxlcol.  Appl. Pharmacol.   18:  60-68.

Klnlln, T.E.,  R.   Muralldhara, A.O.  Plttet, A. Sanderson  and a.P.  Walradt.'
1972.   Volatile components  1n roasted filberts.   J. Agrlc. Food Chem.  20:
1021-1028.

Knle,  J.,  A.  Haelke,  I.  Juhnke  and  H. Schiller.    1983.  Results of  studies
of  chemical  substances  using   four   blotests.   Dtsch.  Gewaesserkd.  Hltt.
27(3):  77-79.

Kramer, N. and R.N. Doetsch.  1950.   The  growth of  phenol  utilizing  bacteria
on aromatic carbon sources.  Arch.  Blochem. Blophys.  26:  401-405.

Kuroda, K.,  Y.S.   Yoo  and T.  Ishlbashl.    1984.   Antlmutagenlc  activity  of
food additives.  Mutat. Res.   130:  369.
0269d
-60-
11/01/89

-------
Lazzarlnl,  S.   1982.    Contact  allergy  to  benzyl  alcohol  and  Isopropyl
palmltate Ingredients of topical  cortkosterold.   8:  349-350.


Lebel, M., L.  Perron,  M.  Hasson,  J. Plchette and C. Carrier,  1988.  Benzyl
alcohol  metabolism  and  elimination  1n  neonates.   Oev.  Pharmacol.  Thera-
peutics.   11: 347-356.


Llpnlck,  R.L.,  D.E.  Johnson,  J.H.  Gilford,  C.K.  Blcklngs  and L.D. Newsome.
1985.  Comparison  of fish  toxldty screening data  for  55 alcohols with the
quantitative  structure-activity relationship predictions of  minimum toxlclty
for  nonreactlve nonelectrolyte organic compounds.   Environ. "Foxlcol. Chem.

4(3): 281-296.
                                                                            *

Little {Arthur  0.  Little, Inc.).   1984.   Development  of candidate chemical
simulant  11st:  The evaluation of candidate  chemical  simulants which  may  be
used 1n chemically hazardous  operations.  NTIS/AD-B070 947.   144  p.


Loeb,  H.A.  and W.H.  Kelly.    1963.   Acute oral  toxlclty  of  1496  chemicals
force-fed  to carp.  U.S.  F1sh.  Wlldl. Serv.  Sp. Sd.   Rep.  Fish.  No.  471,
Washington, DC.  p. 1-7.


Lyman, W.J.,  W.F.  Reehl and  D.H.  Rosenblatt.   1982.   Handbook  of Chemical
Property  Estimation Methods.   McGraw Hill  Book Co.,  New  York. NY.


Mantel,  N.  and  M.A.   Schnelderman.    1975.   Estimating  "safe"  levels,   a
hazardous undertaking.   Cancer Res.   35: 1379-1386.
0269d                               -61-                             11/01/89

-------
Mattson,  V.R.,  J.W. Arthur  and C.T.  Walbrldge.   1976.   Acute toxlclty  of
selected  organic  compounds  to  fathead minnows.   U.S.  EPA,  Off.  Res.  Oev.
4-3(17): 1-13.

McCloskey, S.E.,  J.J.  Gershanlk,  J.J.L. Lertora,  L.  White and W.J.  George.
1986.   ToxIcHy  of  benzyl  alcohol   1n  adult and  neonatal  mice.   J.  Pharm.
Scl.  75: 702-705.

McGregor,  O.B.,  A.  Brown,  P.  Cattanach,  et  al.   1988.   Responses of  the
L5178Y  tk+/tkmouse  lymphoma cell  forward  mutation  assay:   III.  72  Coded
chemicals.  Env. Mol. Mutagen.  12:  85-154.

Menczel,  E.  and  H.I. Malbach.  1970.   in  vitro human  percutaneous  penetra-
tlon  of  benzyl  alcohol  and testosterone:  Epidermal-dermal   retention.   J.
Invest. Dermatol.  54:  386-394.

Menczel,  E.  and H.I.  Malbach.   1972.  Chemical binding  to human dermls  Jjn
vitro of testosterone and benzyl alcohol.   Acta. Dermatol.  52: 38-42.

Mill,  T., D.  Hendry  and  H. Richardson.   1980.   Free radical oxldants  In
national waters.  Science.  207: 886-887.

Hortelmans,  K.,  S.  Haworth,  T.  LawTor, W.  Speck,  B. Talner  and  E.  Zelger.
1986.   Salmonella  mutagenlclty  tests.  II.  Results  from  the  testing  of 270
chemicals.  Environ. Mutagen.  8:  1-26, 47.
0263d
-62-
11/01/89

-------
Motoyoshl, K.t  Y.  Toyoshlma, M.  Sato  and M. Yoshlmura.   1979.   Comparative

studies  on the  Irrltancy of  oils  and   synthetic  perfumes  to  the skin  of

rabbit, guinea  pig,  rat,  miniature swine and man.   Cosmet.  Toiletries.   94:

41-48.



Mulawa, P.A.  and S.H.  Cadle.   1981.  Measurement  of  phenols  1n  automobile

exhaust.  Anal. Lett.  14(A9):  671-687.



NIOSH  (National  Institute  for  Occupational  Safety   and  Health).    1984.

Current-  awareness   file.    RTECS   (Registry   of  Tox.lc  Effects  of  Chemical

Substances).   Online.


                                                                             i
NTP  (National  Toxicology Program).   1988.   Toxicology  and  carclnogenesls

studies of benzyl alcohol (CAS No. 100-51-6) In  F344/N rats  and  B6C3F1  mice

(gavage  studies).    Natl.  Toxlcol.  Program   Technical  Report,  NTP TR  343.

p. 1-161.



Opdyke, O.L.J.   1973.   Monographs on  fragrance raw  materials.   Food  Cosmet.

Toxlcol.  II:  1011-1013.



Rlddlck, 3.A., VLB.  Bunger and  T.K.  Sakano.   1986.   Organic  solvents:  Physi-

cal  properties  and  methods  of purification.   In:  Techniques  of  Chemistry,

Vol. 2, 4th ed.  W1ley-Intersc1ence, New York, NY.  p.  240-241.



Rlngk,  W.  and  E.T.  Thelmer.    1979.    Benzyl  alcohol  and  beta  phenetyl

alcohol.   ITU  K1rk-0thmer Encyclopedia  of Chemical  Technology, Vol.  3,  3rd

ed.  Wlley-Intersclence, New York, NY.   p. 793-802.




0269d                               -63-                             11/01/89

-------
Rogan,  E.G.,  E.I. Cavallerl,  B.A.  Walker,  et al.   1986.   Mutagenlclty  of
benzyl1c  acetates,   sulfates   and  bromides  of  polycycllc  aromatic  hydro-
carbons.  Chem. B1ol. Interact.  58:  253-275.

SANSS (Structure and Nomenclature Search System).   1989.   Online 2/28/89.

Sax,  N.I.  and  R.3.  Lewis.   1987.   Hawley's  Condensed Chemical  Dictionary.
Van Nostrand Relnhold Co.,  New York,  NY.  p.  134-135.

Schafer, E.W.,  H.A.  Bowles  and J.  Huellout.    1983.  The  acute  oral  toxlclty
repellency and  hazard  potential  of 998  chemicals  to  one or more  species  of
wild and domestic birds.  Arch. Environ. Contam.  Toxlcol.   12:  355-382.
                                                                            %
Selzlnger,  D.E.  and B.  Dlmltrlades.   1972.    Oxygenates   In  exhaust  from
simple hydrocarbon fuels.  J.  Air Pollut. Control Assoc.   22: 47-51.

Shelton,  D.R.  and   J.M.  Tledje.   1984.   General  method  for  determining
anaerobic blodegradatlon potential.   Appl.  Environ. M1crob1ol.   47: 850-857.

Shmunes, E.   1984.   Allergic  dermatitis to  benzyl alcohol  In  an  Injectable
solution.  Arch. Dermatol.   120:  1200-1201.

Shojl,  A.   1983.   Allergic reaction  to  benzyl  alcohol  In an  antlmycotlc
preparation.  Contact Dermatitis.  9:  510.
Slnnlah,  B.   1983.   Insectlcldal  effect  of  aliphatic  alcohols  against
aquatic stages of  Aedes  mosquitoes.   Trans. R. Soc.  Trop.  Med.  Hyg.   77(1):
35-38.
0269d
-64-
11/01/89

-------
Sloane. N.H.   1965.   Hydroxymethylatlon of the benzene  ring.   1.  Mlcrosomal
formation  of  phenol  via  prior   hydroxymethylatlon  of  benzene.    Blochlm.
Blophys Acts.  107: 599-602.

Smyth,  H.F.,  C.P.  Carpenter  and  C.S.  Well.   1951.   Range finding  toxlclty
data: List IV.  AMA Arch. Ind. Hyg. Occup. Med.  4:  119-122.

Snapper,  I.,  A.  Gruenbaum and  S.  Sturkop.   1924.   The  decomposition  and
oxidation of  benzyl  alcohol and benzyl  esters In the human  organism.   Ned.
Tljdschr  Geneeskd.    68:  3125-3133.   (Cited   In  Little,  1984;  FEMA,  1984;
Anonymous, 1984)

Southworth,   G.R.  and  J.L.  Keller.    1986.   Hydrophoblc  sorptlon  of  polar*
organlcs by low organic carbon soils.  Water A1r Soil  Pollut.   28:  239-248.

SRI  (Stanford  Research Institute).   1988.   Directory of  Chemical  Producers
In the United States of America.  SRI International,  Menlo  Park,  CA.   p.  633.

Stekol, J.A.   1939.   Studies on the  mercapturlc  acid synthesis 1n  animals.
XI.  The detoxlcatlon  of  benzyl chloride,  benzyl  alcohol, benzaldehyde  and
s-benzylhomocyste1ne  1n   the  rabbit  and  rat.   J.   Biological  Chem.   128:
199-205.

Stratton,  G.W.  and   C.T.   Corke.   1982.    Toxlclty   of  the   Insecticide
permethMn and  some  degradation  products  towards  algae and  cyanobacterla.
Environ. Pollut. Ser.  29{1): 71-80.
0269d                               -65-                             11/01/89

-------
Swann, R.L., D.A. Laskowskl, P.3. McCall,  K.  Vander  Kuy and H.J.  Dlshburger.
1983.  A  rapid  method  for  the  estimation of  the  environmental  parameters
octanol/water  partition  coefficient,  soil  sorptlon constant,  water  to  air
ratio and water solubility.  Res. Rev.  85: 17-28.

Takeoka,   6.R.,  R.A.  Flath,  M.  Guntert  and  W.  Jennings.   1988.   Nectarine
volatlles:  Vacuum  steam distillation  versus  headspace sampling.   J.  Agrlc.
Food Chem.  36: 553-560.

Treon, J.F. and  M.3.  Stasik.  1983.  Alcohols.   In: Encyclopedia  of  Occupa-
tional Health  and  Safety,  3rd  rev.  ed., L.  Parmegg1an1,  Ed.   U.S.  EPA,
Washington, DC.  1:  109-112.
                                                                             «
TSCAPP.   1989.   Computer  print-out  of non-confidential production  data  from
TSCA Inventory OPTS, CID,  U.S.  EPA,  Washington, DC.  Online 3/28/89.

Urano,  K.  and  Z.   Kato.    1986.    Evaluation  of  blodegradatlon  ranks  of
priority organic compounds.  J. Haz. Hat.  13: 147-159.

U.S.  EPA.  1980.   Guidelines  and  Methodology Used  In  the  Preparation  of
Health  Effect  Assessment   Chapters  of  the  Consent  Decree  Water  Criteria
Documents.  Federal  Register.  45:  79347-79357.
U.S. EPA.   1984.   Methodology and Guidelines for  Reportable  Quantity Deter-
minations Based on  Chronic  Toxlclty Data.  Prepared by  the  Office of Health
and Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental Criteria and  Assessment Office,
Cincinnati,  OH  for  the  Office  of  Emergency  and  Remedial   Response,  Wash-
ington, DC.
0269d
-66-
11/01/89

-------
U.S.  EPA.   1986a.   Methodology  for  Evaluating  Reportable  Quantity  Adjust-
ments Pursuant  to CERCLA  Section  102,   Prepared  by the Carcinogen Assessment
Group,  Office  of  Health  and Environmental  Assessment  for  the Office  of
Emergency and Remedial Response,  Washington, DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1986b.    Guidelines   for   Carcinogen   Risk  Assessment.   Federal
Register.  51: 33992-34003.

U.S.  EPA.   1987.    Graphical  Exposure  Modeling  System   (GEMS).   Fate  of
Atmospheric Pollutants (FAP),.  Office of Toxic Substances, Washington, DC.

U.S.  EPA/OWRS (Office of  Water   Regulations  and   Standards).   1986.   Guide-
lines  for  Deriving  Numerical  National  Water   Quality  Criteria  for  the*
Protection of  Aquatic Organisms  and  Their  Uses.   U.S. EPA,  Washington,  DC.
p. 22-58, 98.  NTIS PB85-227049/XAB.

USITC  (U.S.  International  Trade  Commission).    1987.   Synthetic  Organic
Chemicals  United  States  Production  and  Sales,  1986.   Publ.  No.  2009,
Washington, DC.  p.  214,  239, 240.

USITC  (U.S.  International  Trade  Commission).    1988.   Synthetic  Organic
Chemicals  United  States  Production  and  Sales,  1987.   Publ.  No.  2118,
Washington, OC.  p.  15-37.

Valshnav, D.D.   1986.  Chemical  structure-blodegradatlon Inhibition and fish
acute  toxlclty  relationships  for  narcotic  Industrial  chemicals.   Toxlcol.
Assess.  1(2): 227-240.


0269d                               -67-                             11/01/89

-------
Van  Joost,  T.,  E.  Stolz and  J.C.S.  van der  Hoek.   1985.   Simultaneous
allergy to perfume  Ingredients.   Contact  Dermatitis.   12: 115-116.

Haters, R., R. MUzayans, J.  Meredith, G. Mallalah, N. Danford and a. Parry.
1982.  Correlations In mammalian  cells  between  types  of  ONA damage rates of
DNA repair and the  biological  consequences.  Prog.  Mutat. Res.  4: 247-259.

Weast, R.C.,  M.J.  Astle  and  W.H. Beyer.  1988.   CRC Handbook of Chemistry
and Physics, 69th ed.   CRC Press,  Inc.,  Boca Raton,  FL.   p. C-146.

Wllcke, J.R.  1984.   Idlosyncracles  of  drug metabolism 1n  cats.   Effects on
pharmacotherapeutks  In  feline  practice.   Vet.  Clln.  North.  Am.    14:
1345-1354.

Wilson, J.P., D.A.  Sollmando Jr.  and  M.S.  Edwards.  1966.  Parenteral benzyl
alcohol  Induced  hypersensltlvlty  reaction.  Drug  Intell.  Clln.  Pharm.    20:
689-691.

Wilson, C.L., 0.0.  Franklin  and  B.E. Otto.   1987.  Fruit  volatlles  Inhibi-
tory  to  MonlUnla  fructlcola  and  Botrytls  clneren.   Plant  DIs.   71(4):
316-319.

Wood,  E.M.   1954.   The  toxldty  of  3400  chemicals  to fish.  Fish Toxlclty
Report No.  1.   U.S. Fish and Wildlife  Service,  Department of the  Interior,
Leetown, WV.  (Cited 1n Llpnlck  et.  al., 1985}
0269d
-68-
11/01/89

-------
Yoo, Y.S.  1986.  Mutagenlc and  antlmutagenlc  activities  of  flavoring agents
In foodstuffs.  J. Osaka City Med. Center.  34: 267-88.

York, R.6., P.L. Barnwell, H. Plerrera,  R.L.  Schuler  and  B.O.  Hardln.  1988.
Evaluation of twelve chemicals  In a  preliminary  developmental  toxlclty test.
37: 503-504.
0269d                               -69-                             11/01/89

-------
                                  APPENDIX A

                              LITERATURE  SEARCHED



    This  HEED  Is  based  on  data  Identified  by  computerized  literature

searches of the following:
              CHEMUNE
              TSCATS
              CASR online (U.S. EPA Chemical Activities Status Report)
              TOXLINE
              TOXLIT
              TOXLIT 65
              RTECS
              OHM TADS
              STORET
              SRC Environmental Fate Data Bases
              SANSS
              AQUIRE
              TSCAPP
              NTIS
              Federal Register
              CAS ONLINE (Chemistry and Aquatic)
              HSDB
              SCISEARCH
              Federal Research In Progress
These  searches  were conducted  In  April, 1989,  and the  following  secondary

sources were reviewed:
    ACGIH  (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts}.
    1986.  Documentation  of  the  Threshold  Limit Values  and  Biological
    Exposure Indices, 5th ed.  Cincinnati,  OH.

    ACGIH  (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1987.  TLVs:  Threshold Limit  Values for Chemical Substances  1n  the
    Work  Environment  adopted  by  ACGIH   with   Intended  Changes   for
    1987-1988.  Cincinnati,  OH.  114 p.

    Clayton,   G.D. and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1981.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and  Toxicology,   3rd  rev.  ed., Vol.  2A.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.  2878 p.

    Clayton,   G.D. and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1981.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and  Toxicology,   3rd  rev.  ed., Vol.  28.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.  p. 2879-3816.
0269d
-70-
11/01/89

-------
    Clayton,  G.D.   and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.    1982.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and  Toxicology,  3rd  rev.  ed.,   Vol.  2C.    John  WHey  and
    Sons, NY.  p. 3817-5112.

    Grayson, M.  and D. Eckroth,  Ed.   1978-1984.  Klrk-Othmer  Encyclo-
    pedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd ed.  John  Wiley  and  Sons,  NY.   23
    Volumes.

    Hamilton, A. and H.L. Hardy.  1974.   Industrial  Toxicology,  3rd  ed.
    Publishing Sciences Group, Inc.,  Littleton,  MA.   575 p.

    IARC  (International  Agency  for   Research  on Cancer).   IARC  Mono-
    graphs  on   the  Evaluation  of  Carcinogenic   Risk   of  Chemicals   to
    Humans.  IARC,  WHO, Lyons, France.

    Jaber,  H.M.,  W.R.  Mabey,  A.T.  L1eu,  T.W.   Chou and H.L.  Johnson.
    1984.   Data  acquisition   for  environmental  transport   and  fate
    screening for compounds of Interest  to  the  Office of Solid Waste.
    EPA  600/6-84-010.    NTIS  PB84-243906.    SRI  International,   Menlo
    Park, CA.

    NTP  (National Toxicology  Program).   1987.   Toxicology Research  and
    Testing  Program.   Chemicals  on   Standard   Protocol.    Management
    Status.

    Ouellette,   R.P. and  J.A.  King.    1977.   Chemical  Week  Pesticide
    Register.  McGraw-Hill  Book Co.,  NY.

    Sax, I.N.  1984.   Dangerous Properties of  Industrial  Materials,  6th
    ed.  Van Nostrand Relnhold Co.,  NY.

    SRI  (Stanford   Research  Institute).   1987.   Directory of  Chemical
    Producers.   Menlo Park,  CA.

    U.S.  EPA.   1986.   Report  on  Status  Report   In  the Special  Review
    Program.  Registration   Standards   Program  and   the  Data  Call   In
    Programs.  Registration Standards and  the  Data Call  In  Programs.
    Office of Pesticide Programs,  Washington,  DC.

    USITC  (U.S.  International  Trade  Commission).    1986.    Synthetic
    Organic  Chemicals.   U.S.  Production  and Sales, 1985,  USITC  Pub!.
    1892, Washington,  DC.

    Verschueren, K.   1983.   Handbook of  Environmental Data  on  Organic
    Chemicals,  2nd ed.   Van Nostrand Relnhold Co., NY.

    Wlndholz, H., Ed.  1983.  The Merck  Index,  10th  ed.  Merck and Co..
    Inc., Rahway, NJ.

    Worthing, C.R.  and S.6.  Walker,  Ed.   1983.   The  Pesticide  Manual.
    British Crop Protection Council.   695 p.
0269d                               -71-                             11/01/89

-------
    In addition,  approximately 30  compendia of  aquatic  toxldty data  were

reviewed, Including the following:
    Battelle's  Columbus  Laboratories.   1971.   Water  Quality  Criteria
    Data  Book.   Volume   3.   Effects  of  Chemicals   on   Aquatic   Life.
    Selected  Data  from the Literature  through  1968.   Prepared for  the
    U.S. EPA under Contract No.  68-01-0007.   Washington,  DC.

    Johnson,  W.W.  and  M.T. Flnley.   1980.   Handbook  of  Acute  ToxIcHy
    of  Chemicals  to   Fish and  Aquatic  Invertebrates.   Summaries,  of
    Toxlclty  Tests  Conducted at  Columbia  National  Fisheries  Research
    Laboratory.   1965-1978.   U.S.  Dept.  Interior.  Fish  and  Wildlife
    Serv. Res. Publ. 137,  Washington, DC.
    McKee, J.E. and  H.W.  Wolf.   1963.   Water
    Prepared  for   the  Resources  Agency  of
    Quality Control Board.  Publ. No. 3-A.
          Quality Criteria, 2nd ed.
           California,  State  Water
    Plmental, D.  1971.  Ecological  Effects  of  Pesticides  on  Non-Target
    Species.  Prepared for  the U.S. EPA, Washington, DC.   PB-269605.

    Schneider, B.A.   1979.   Toxicology  Handbook.   Mammalian and  Aquatic
    Data.  Book 1: Toxicology Data.   Office  of  Pesticide  Programs,  U.S.
    EPA, Washington,  DC.  EPA 540/9-79-003.  NTIS PB 80-196876.
0269d
-72-
11/01/89

-------















fmm
0
O
u

^£

^B
^^
ISJ
CO C
O>
X CO
!••!
Q l_
Z O
LLJ U—
Q.
O. O>
f,
W
nj
€
IB
3
yj



























41
O
C
Ol
u-
O)
*
£7

o

0
u-
ce




-*->
u
O)
14-
t^
LU









Ol 
i- -O
3 X.
V> 0»
O .*

x o>
LLJ E


VI
O>
U
V

*
O,
a o a i—
•o
en
J*
a>
E

0
a a o
O> i—
3 o

•o c
0 0
J3 U

c o
«r— ^J

41 T3
en 0>
T3 L-
Ol 03
l- Q.
U E
O O O O) O
i— i i— i i_i -O U


0
U- VI
^£
vO 0)
CO Ol
• 3
CM
O O O <• CO
•— ' •— 1 1— 1 r— r—



Q a a ra
i-^ t-^ h— I L»




a>

3
I/I
O >>
a •*-•
x «~ ot
LU LJ t_
I^B ^3
C U C in u
0 H- 0> 0 i-
«- c a> a c
•4-» O U O X O
ro i_ •<- c LU L.
<— J= C f- f
PO O O W «— W
JZ JQ k_ k_ ffl A
C 3 J= 
u-
O **-
O
^ JC
— E u
in 3 to
«O "- E Ol
i— r- O >
OL Ol *•> "—
i_ f tn •*->
O) +•> O> >O
>» a. o o>
^ Ol ew C


0 10
<4— ,X
Ol
L{* Ol ^^*
CO 3 f^*
O
(M CO U"> O
•* O CO O «
f— ^ CSJ ^ Z



^3 "nO
* •
J-> >.
«J i-
 •- U
LU X f-
i-l O C
(_ -U 4>
i^ O>
H* O O
>> 3E — C
*J < C <^-
-- 13 O 0
O O t_ L.
•^™ «C ^B
C LU U U
Ol — J
en aa e e
U 0 «C 0 0
•r- C t—
c »- oe -a T3
O U O O» O)
i_ i_ a. v> vt
^C fO lj>>l ^9 ^9
O tj GC CD CO




















%














0>
^™
jQ

u
*~
'L^

3
I/I
C
NH

II

C3
t— l
11/01/89

-------
                                  APPENDIX C
         DOSE/DURATION RESPONSE GRAPHS FOR EXPOSURE TO BENZYL ALCOHOL
C.I.   DISCUSSION
    Dose/duration-response graphs for  Inhalation and  oral  exposure  to benzyl
alcohol generated by the method  of  Crockett  et  al.  (1985)  using the computer
software by  Durkin  and Heylan (1988) are  presented  1n Figures  C-l  through
C-4.  Data  used  to  generate  these  graphs are presented In  Section  C.2.   In
the generation  of  these  figures,  all  responses are  classified as  adverse
(FEL,  AEL or LOAEL) or  nonadverse (NOEL  or  NOAEL)  for plotting.  For Inhala-
tion exposure  the ordlnate  expresses  concentration  1n  either  of  two  ways.
In  Figure  C-l,   the  experimental   concentration   expressed  as  mg/m3  was
multiplied by the time  parameters of the exposure  protocol  (e.g.,  hours/day
and  days/week)   and  Is  presented   as   expanded  experimental  concentration*
[expanded  exp  cone   (mg/m3)].    In  Figure  C-2,   the expanded  experimental
concentration was multiplied  by  the cube root  of  the ratio of  the animal:
human body weight to  adjust for  species  differences  In  basal metabolic rate
(Mantel and  Schnelderman, 1975)  to estimate an  equivalent  human  or scaled
             «»
concentration  [scaled  cone   (mg/m3)].   For  oral  exposure,  the  ordlnate
expresses dosage  as  human equivalent  dose.   The animal dosage  In  mg/kg/day
1s multiplied by  the  cube root of  the ratio of  the an1mal:human body weight
to  adjust  for  species  differences  In  basal   metabolic  rate   (Mantel  and
Schnelderman, 1975).  The  result 1s then multiplied  by  70 kg,  the reference
human body  weight,  to  express  the  human equivalent dose as  mg/day  for  a 70
kg human.
    The boundary  for  adverse  effects  (solid line)  1s drawn  by Identifying
the lowest adverse  effect dose or  concentration at  the shortest duration of
exposure at  which an  adverse effect occurred.   From  this  point, an  Infinite
0269d
-74-
11/01/89

-------
e
u

z
      ieee
          e.eeei
fInhalation  Exposure)
                                                       .061
HUNAN E4U1U DURATION Cfraction lif*sput>


           ENVELOP METHOD
 Key:   F . FEL



 SoUd Line - Adverse Effects Boundary
                                      FIGURE  C-l



                Dose/Duration Response Graph for Inhalation Exposure to

                        Benzyl  Alcohol,  Expanded Concentration
    0269d
           -75-
                                                                        11/01/89

-------
       1000
 n


 I
        lee
              Benzyl alcoKol
           0.0001
BENZALC.DDP


           ENVELOP METHOD
                                                                                    0.001
 Key:   F . FEL

 Solid Line « Adverse Effects Boundary
                                       FIGURE C-2

                 Dose/Duration  Response  Graph for  Inhalation  Exposure to
                          Benzyl Alcohol, Scaled Concentration
     0269d
           -76-

-------
     leeeee
      leeee • -
H

g
3
9
hi
9
       1800 • -
        100
          e.eeai
BEWZflLC.DDP
   aI  Exposure)
                     alcohol
                                                              I IMI|	1—I	1  I  I I III
e.eei              e.ei              e.i
 HUNAN EQUIV  DURATION (fraction lif*ci»an>
            EMUELOP METHOD
  Key:    N  .  NOEL
         L  -  LOEL
         F  «  FEL

  Solid  Line  -  Adverse  Effects  Boundary
  Dashed Line - No  Adverse  Effects Boundary
                                         FIGURE C-3

                     Dose/Duration Response Graph for Oral Exposure to
                              Benzyl Alcohol. Envelope Method
       0269d
              -77-
11/01/89

-------
     180688
J

I

H
2
9
18888 • r
       1888 • -
        188
          8.8881
(fir*!  Exposure)
                       8.881              8.81               8.1
                        HUNAN EQUIU DURATION (fraction lifespan)

                              CENSORED DATA METHOD
  Key:   N . NOEL
         L - LOEL
         F « FEL

  Solid Line • Adverse Effects Boundary
  Dashed Line » No Adverse Effects Boundary
                                       FIGURE C-4

                    Dose/Duration  Response  Graph  for  Oral  Exposure  to
                          Benzyl Alcohol, Censored Date Method
     0269d
                                                                    ll/01/89

-------
line  Is  extended  upward, parallel  to  the dose axis.  The  starting  point  1s
then  connected  to  the  lowest adverse  effect dose  or  concentration at  the
next  longer duration  of  exposure that has an  adverse effect  dose  or concen-
tration equal to  or  lower than  the previous  one.   This  process  Is continued
to the lowest adverse effect  dose  or  concentration.   From this  point, a line
1s extended  to the  right,  parallel  to  the  duration axis.   The  region  of
adverse effects lies above the adverse effects boundary.
    Using the envelope  method,  the boundary  for  no adverse  effects (dashed
line) Is drawn by  Identifying  the  highest  no  adverse effects  dose  or concen-
tration.  From this  point,  a  line parallel to the  duration axis  Is  extended
to the dose or  concentration  axis.  The  starting point  Is  then  connected  to
the next lower or  equal  no adverse effect dose or  concentration at  a longer
duration of exposure.  When  this process can  no  longer  be  continued, a line'
1s dropped parallel  to  the  dose or concentration axis to the duration axis.
The no  adverse  effects  region lies below  the no adverse  effects boundary.
At  either  ends  of  the  graph between  the  adverse effects  and  no adverse
effects boundaries  are  regions  of ambiguity.  The  area (1f any)  resulting
from  Intersection  of the adverse  effects  and no adverse  effects  boundaries
Is defined as  the region of  contradiction.
    In the censored  data  method, all  no  adverse  effect  points located In the
region of  contradiction   are  dropped  from consideration  and  the  no adverse
effect boundary Is redrawn so  that It  does  not Intersect the adverse effects
boundary and  no  region  of contradiction  Is  generated.   This method results
In the most conservative definition of the no adverse effects  region.
    As seen from  Figures  C-l  and  C-2, only one data point  was  available for
Inhalation exposure.   Figure  C-3  presents  the dose-duration  response  graph
generated by  the  envelope method.  The  adverse  effects  boundary  Is defined


0269d                               -79-                             11/01/89

-------
by  five  points,  corresponding  to  an LD5Q  In  rabbits  of 1040 tng/kg  (Graham
and Kulzenga,  1945)  (Rec. #27), a  mouse  LD5_  of 1580 mg/kg  (Jenner  et  a!.,
1964)  (Rec.   #26),  maternal  mortality  and  body  weight  decrease  In  mice
gavaged with  750  mg/kg during  days  7-14  of gestation,  decreased  Utter  and
pup weights (Hazelden, 1983)  (Rec.  #7), rough  hair  coat  1n  female rats given
250  mg/kg 5  days/week for  16  days  (NTP,  1988)  (Rec.  #17) and  Increased
mortality  In  female  rats  gavaged  with  200 mg/kg 5 days/week for  103 weeks
(NTP, 1988) (Rec. #1).  The  no  effects  boundary  Is  defined  by two points one
representing  no  effects  observed   1n  male rats  at dose  levels <400  mg/kg
given 5 days  a week  for 91 days (NTP,  1988) (Rec.  #6),  and  the  other  repre-
senting the  2-year  study  by  NTP (1988) where no effects  were  seen  In  male
mice at the  100  mg/kg dosage given 5 days  a week (Rec.  #10).  The  region of
contradiction contains some LOAELs, NOAELs and NOELs.
    When  the  graph  Is  redrawn to eliminate the  region  of  contradiction  (see
Figure C-4),  the no adverse  effects  boundary  Is  defined  by  the points repre-
senting the  dose  levels of 200  mg/kg 5 days/week for 91 days (Rec.  #2)  and
200 mg/kg, 5  days/week  for  2  years  (Rec.  #12), both given to male rats for 2
years and producing no observed effects  (NTP,  1988).
C.2.   DATA USED TO GENERATE DOSE/DURATION-RESPONSE GRAPHS
C.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure.
Chemical Name:    Benzyl Alcohol
CAS Number:       100-51-6
Document Title:   Health and Environmental Effects Document  for Benzyl
                  Alcohol
Document Number:   Pending
Document Date:    Pending
Document Type:    HEED
0269d
-BO-
l/01/89

-------
RECORD #1
Comment:


Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
NR
PEL
Inhalation
Dose:                  4422.000
Duration Exposure:      0.3 days
Duration Observation:   14.0 days
Number Exposed:     6
Number Responses:   3
Type of Effect:     DEATH
Site of Effect:     BODY
Severity Effect:    10

Acute  Inhalation  toxlclty  reported;  no  other  endpolnts,
Maximum Inhalation of saturated vapor 2 hours  without death.

Smyth et al.. 1951
C.2.2.  Oral Exposure.
Chemical Name:
CAS Number:
Document Title:

Document Number:
Document Date:
Document Type:
   Benzyl alcohol
   100-51-6
   Health and Environmental Effects Document for Benzyl
   Alcohol
   Pending
   Pending
   HEED
RECORD #1
Comment:
Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Rats
Female
LOAEL
Route:
Dose:                 143.000
Duration Exposure:    103.0 weeks
Duration Observation: 103.0 weeks
               Number Exposed:
               Number Responses:
               Type of Effect:
               Site of Effect:
               Severity Effect:
                    Gavage

                    50
                    33
                    DEATH
                    BODY
                    10
Doses given:  0,  200, 400  mg/kg/day  x 5  days/week  = 0,  143,
286  mg/kg/day.   Nonaccldental  deaths:  control, 13;  low,  16;
high,  20/50.   Accidental  deaths  1,  17,  13/50.  LOAEL  basis
for chronic RfD.

NTP, 1988
0269d
                     -81-
                                           11/01/89

-------
RECORD #2:
Comment:
Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Female
NOAEL
Gavage
Dose:                  143.000
Duration Exposure:      91.0 days
Duration Observation:   91.0 days
Number Exposed:     0
Number Responses:   9
Type of Effect:     WGTDC
Site of Effect:     BODY
Severity Effect:    4

Dosages: 0, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800 mg/kg 5 days/week = 0, 36,
71,  143,  286,  571  mg/kg/day.   NOAEL 1s basis  for  subchronlc
RfD.

NTP, 1988
RECORD #3:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Male
PEL
Gavage
Dose:
Duration
Duration


Exposure:
Observation:

571.000
91.0 days
91.0 days

Comment:


Citation:
               Number Exposed:     10       10       9        10
               Number Responses:   4598
               Type of Effect:     DEATH    NECRO    NECRO    ATROP
               SHe of Effect:     BODY     MSKEL    BRAIN    THYHS
               Severity Effect:     10       8        8        8
Four additional deaths  attributed  to gavage procedure.
of the hlstopathologlc effects occurred at lower doses.

NTP, 1988
                                             9
                                             6
                                             FUNP
                                             KIDNY
                                             8

                                              None
RECORD #4:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Female
AEL
Gavage
Dose:
Duration
Duration


Exposure:
Observation:

571.000
91.0 days
91.0 days

Comment:
Citation:
Number Exposed:     7
Number Responses:   7
Type of Effect:     NECRO
Site of Effect:     BRAIN
Severity Effect:    8

Other effects: final mean body weights 5% lower than controls;
staggering  and lethargy  following dosing.   See  Rec. #2  for
dosing schedule.

NTP, 1988
0269d
                     -82-
                                           11/01/89

-------
RECORD #5:     Species:    Rats
               Sex:        Female
               Effect:     LOAEL

               Number Exposed:     9
               Number Responses:   9
               Type  of  Effect:     HGTOC
               Site  of  Effect:     BODY
               Severity  Effect:    4
        Dose:                   286.000
        Duration  Exposure:      91.0 days
        Duration  Observation:   91.0 days
Comment: See Rec. #2.
Citation: NTP, 1988
RECORD #6: Species: Rats
Sex: Male
Effect: NOAEL
Route: Gavage
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
SHe of Effect:
Severity Effect:
Dose: 286.000



10
0
DEATH
BODY
10
Duration Exposure: 91
Duration Observation: 91

9 10 9
000
NECRO ATROP FUNP
BRAIN THYMS KIDNY
888
.0 days
.0 days

10
0
NECRO
MSKEL
8
Comment:       No hlstopathologlc effects at doses <571 mg/kg/day.   One  male
               died In 200 mg/kg dose group (143 mg/kg/day)  after dosing.

Citation:      NTP. 1988
RECORD #7:








Species: Mice
Sex: Female
Effect: AEL
Route: Gavage
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
SHe of Effect:
Severity Effect:




19
50
DEATH
BODY
10
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation;

21 21
21 21
WGTDC RE PRO
BODY FETUS
4 9
750.000
8.0 days
21.0 days






Comment:       Maternal toxlclty  on treatment  days  7-14: hunched,  tremors,
               subdued, prostrate,  dyspnoea,  swollen  and cyanotlc  abdomen,
               plloerectlon,  cyanosis.   Increased  maternal  toxlclty:  19/50
               vs. 0/50 controls.

Citation:      Hazelden, 1983
0269d
-83-
11/01/89

-------
RECORD #8:
Comment:
Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Mice
Female
LOAEL
Gavage
Dose:                  571.000
Duration Exposure:      91.0 days
Duration Observation:   91.0 days
Number Exposed:      B
Number Responses:    8
Type of Effect:      WGTDC
SHe of Effect:      BODY
Severity Effect:    4

Dosages: 0, 50, 100,  200,  400,  800 mg/kg  x  5 days/week =  0,
36, 71,  143,  286,  571 mg/kg/day.   Final  mean body weight  854
lower than controls.  Signs of neurotoxlclty  after  dosing.

NTP, 1988
RECORD #9:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Mice
Female
NOAEL
Gavage
Dose:
Duration
Duration


Exposure:
Observation:

286.000
91.0 days
91.0 days

Comment:


Citation:
Number Exposed:     9
Number Responses:   0
Type of Effect:     WGTDC
SHe of Effect:     BODY
Severity Effect:    4

Final mean  body  weight  5X lower than controls.
related hlstopathologlcal effects were observed.

NTP, 1988
                                       No  compound-
RECORD #10:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Mice
Female
NOEL
Gavage
Dose:
Duration
Duration


Exposure:
Observation:

71.000
103.0 weeks
103.0 weeks

Comment:

Citation:
Number Exposed:     50
Number Responses:   0
Type of Effect:     DEATH
Site of Effect:     BODY
Severity Effect:    10

Doses were 100 and 200 mg/kg, 5 days/week,

NTP, 1988
0269d
                     -84-
                                           11/01/89

-------
RECORD #11
Comment;


Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Hale
LOAEL
Gavage
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:

Hyperplasla of the
200 and 400 mg/kg,

NTP, 1988
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
286.000
103.0 weeks
103.0 weeks
         50
         4
         HYPRP
         COLON
         3

        epithelium of
        5 days/week.
     the  forestomach.   Doses  were
RECORD #12:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Male
NOAEL
Gavage
Dose:
Duration
Duration


Exposure:
Observation:

143.000
103.0 weeks
103.0 weeks

               Number Exposed:      50
               Number Responses:    0
               Type Of Effect:      HYPRP
               SHe of Effect:      COLON
               Severity Effect:    3
Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #13:

See Rec. #11.
NTP, 1988
Species: Rats
Sex: Male
Effect: FEL
Route: Gavage
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
SHe of Effect:
Severity Effect:



5
2
DEATH
BODY
10


Dose:
Duration
Duration
5
NR
8EHAV
BODY
7




Exposure:
Observation:
5
NR
WGTDC
BODY
4
5
NR
HEMOR
CARDV
5


714.000
16.0 days
16.0 days
5
NR
IRRIT
COLON
5
Comment:       Doses  were  125,  250,   500,  1000,  2000  mg/kg,  5  days/week,
               Effects were seen at >1000 mg/kg.

Citation:      NTP, 1988
0269d
                     -85-
                                           11/01/89

-------
RECORD #14:
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Male
LOAEL
Gavage
Dose:                  357.000
Duration Exposure:     16.0 days
Duration Observation:   16.0 days
               Number Exposed:      5
               Number Responses:    MR
               Type of Effect:      FUNS
               Site of Effect:      SKIN
               Severity Effect:     2
Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #15:
Rough hair coat the only effect observed at 500 mg/kg.
NTP, 1988
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Male
NOAEL
Gavage
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
179.000
16.0 days
16.0 days
               Number Exposed:     5
               Number Responses:   0
               Type of Effect:     FUNS
               Site of Effect:     SKIN
               Severity Effect:    2
Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #16:
See Rec. #13.
NTP, 1988
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Female
FEL
Gavage
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
714.000
16.0 days
16.0 days
Number Exposed:     5
Number Responses:   3
Type of Effect:     DEATH
Site of Effect:     BODY
Severity Effect:    10

See Rec.-#13.

NTP, 1988
0269d
                     -86-
                                           11/01/89

-------
RECORD #17
Comment:


Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Female
LOAEL
Gavage
Dose:                  179.000
Duration Exposure:      16.0 days
Duration Observation:   16.0 days
               Number  Exposed:      5
               Number  Responses:    NR
               Type of Effect:      FUNS
               Site of Effect:      SKIN
               Severity Effect:     2
Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #18:
Rough hair
NTP, 1988
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
coat was

Rats
Female
NOAEL
Gavage
the only effect noted. See Rec

Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
. #13.

89.000
16.0 days
16.0 days
               Number Exposed:      5
               Number Responses:    0
               Type of Effect:      FUNS
               Site of Effect:      SKIN
               Severity Effect:     2
Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #19:
See Rec. #13.
NTP, 1988
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Mice
Hale
AEL
Gavage
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
7H.OOO
16.0 days
16.0 days
Number Exposed:     5
Number Responses:   1
Type of Effect:     DEATH
SHe of Effect:     BODY
Severity Effect:    10

All mice  at  the next  higher  dose  level  (1429 mg/kg)  died.
None of the control mice died.

NTP, 1988
0269d
                     -87-
                                           11/01/89

-------
RECORD #20:
Comment:
Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Mice
Male
LOAEL
Gavage
               Number Exposed:      5
               Number Responses:    NR
               Type of Effect:      BEHAV
               Site of Effect:      BODY
               Severity Effect:     7
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation;
                             5
                             NR
                             FUNS
                             SKIN
                             2
357.000
16.0 days
16.0 days
Dosages: 0, 125,  250,  500,  1000, 2000 mg/kg  x  5 days/week =
0,  89,  179t  357,  714,  1429  mg/kg/day.   No  compound-related
hlstopathologlcal effects seen.

NTP, 1988
RECORD #21:








Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #22:








Species: Mice
Sex: Male
Effect: NOAEL
Route: Gavage
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:
See Rec. #20.
NTP, 1988
Species: Mice
Sex: Female
Effect: FEL
Route: Gavage
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:




5
0
BEHAV
BODY
7






5
2
DEATH
BODY
10
Dose:
Duration
Duration

5
0
FUNS
SKIN
2


Dose:
Duration
Duration

5
NR
BEHAV
BODY
7

Exposure:
Observation:









Exposure:
Observation:
.
5 5
NR NR
IRRIT FUNS
OTHER SKIN
5 2
178.000
16.0 days
16.0 days








714.000
16.0 days
16.0 days






Comment:       All  animals  died   in  2000  mg/kg   groups   of   both  sexes.
               Lethargy and  rough hair  coats  were  seen;  also  blood  In  the
               urinary bladder.  See Rec. #20.

Citation:      NTP, 1988
0269d
                                                      11/01/89

-------
RECORD #23:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #24:
Species: Mice
Sex: Female
Effect: NOAEL
Route: Gavage
Number Exposed: 5
Number Responses: 0
Type of Effect: DEATH
Site of Effect: BODY
Severity Effect: 10
See Rec. #20.
NTP, 1988
Species: Rats
Sex: Both
Effect: PEL
Route: Gavage
Dose:
Duration
Duration
5
0
BEHAV
BODY
7


Dose:
Duration
Duration
Exposure:
Observation:
5
0
IRRIT
OTHER
5


5
0
FUNS
SKIN
2


Exposure:
Observation:
357.000
16.0 days
16.0 days



1230.000
1.0 days
14.0 days
Comment:


Citation:
Number Exposed:     10
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     DEATH
Site of Effect:     BODY
Severity Effect:    10

Depression and  then coma within 10-15 minutes,
3-4 days.

Jenner et al., 1964
Excitable for
RECORD #25:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
NR
FEL
Gavage
Dose:
Duration
Duration


Exposure:
Observation:

2080.000
1.0 days
1.0 days

Comment:

Citation:
               Number Exposed:      20
               Number Responses:    NR
               Type of Effect:      DEATH
               Site of Effect:      BODY
               Severity Effect:     10
Graham and Kulzenga, 1945
0269d
                     -89-
     11/01/89


-------
RECORD #26:
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Mice
NR
PEL
Gavage
Dose:                  1580.000
Duration Exposure:      1.0 days
Duration Observation:   14.0 days
Number Exposed:     NR
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     DEATH
SHe of Effect:     BODY
Severity Effect:    10

Depression; death occurred within 2-18 hours.

Jenner et al., 1964
RECORD #27:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rabbits
NR
PEL
Gavage
Oose:
Duration
Duration


Exposure:
Observation:

1040.000
1.0 days
1.0 days

Comment:

Citation:
               Number Exposed:      9
               Number Responses:   NR
               Type of Effect:      DEATH
               Site of Effect:      BODY
               Severity Effect:    10
Graham and Kulzenga, 1945
NR = Not reported
0269d
                     -90-
                                                                     11/01/89

-------