i-..,-••/
 i"f I
        United States
        Environmental Protection
        Agency
FINAL DRAFT
ECAO-CIN-6052
August, 1989
        Research and
        Development
         HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS DOCUMENT
         FOR THIRAM
        Prepared for
         OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND
         EMERGENCY RESPONSE
        Prepared by
        Environmental Criteria  and Assessment Office
        Office of Health and Environmental  Assessment
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        Cincinnati,  OH  45268


                     DRAFT: DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
                            NOTICE

     This document  1s a preliminary draft.  It has not been formally released
f» by  the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and should not at this stage be
*~ construed to represent Agency policy.  It 1s being circulated for comments
^ on  Us technical accuracy and policy Implications.


->                      ENVMONMCNTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       WASHINGTON, D.a 20460

-------
         UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                        WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
                                  a BBS
                                                      OFFICE OP
                                                RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
              th and^nvironmental Effects Document for Thiram

                  H. Farlarttf, Ph.D.
          -Director
          Office of Health and Environmental
            Assessment  (RD-689)

TO:       Matthew Straus
          Chief, Waste Characterization Branch
          Office of Solid Waste  (OS-330)

     I am forwarding copies of the Health and Environmental
Effects Document  (HEED) for Thiram.

     The HEEDs support listings  under RCRA, as well as provide
health-related limits and goals  for emergency and  remedial
c.ctions under CERCLA.  These documents represent scientific
summaries of the pertinent available data on the environmental
fate and mammalian and aquatic toxicity of each chemical  at  an
extramural effort of about $10K,  The attached document has  been
reviewed within OHEA, by staff in OPP and OTS, and by two
external scientists.

     Should you wish to see any  of the files related to the
development of the HEEDs, please call Chris DeRosa at
FTS:  684-7531.

Attachment

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

    This report  is  an external draft  for  review purposes only  and  does  not
constitute  Agency  policy.   Mention of  trade names  or commercial  products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                      11

-------
                                    PREFACE


    Health and  Environmental  Effects Documents (HEEDs) are  prepared  for  the
Office of Solid  Waste  and Emergency Response  (OSMER).  This document series
1s Intended to support listings  under  the  Resource  Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) as  well as to provide health-related limits and  goals  for  emer-
gency and  remedial actions under  the Comprehensive  Environmental  Response,
Compensation  and  Liability  Act  (CERCLA).   Both  published literature  and
Information obtained for  Agency Program Office  files are evaluated  as  they
pertain to potential human health',  aquatic  life  and environmental  effects of
hazardous waste  constituents.   The  literature searched for  In  this document
and  the  dates  searched   are  Included In  "Appendix: Literature  Searched."
Literature search  material  1s current up  to 8 months previous  to  the  final
draft date  listed  on  the front  cover.   Final  draft document  dates  (front
cover) reflect the date the document 1s sent to the  Program Officer (OSWER).

    Several quantitative  estimates  are  presented  provided  sufficient  data
are available.   For systemic  toxicants,  these  Include Reference doses {RfDs)
for  chronic   and  subchronlc  exposures  for  both  the  Inhalation  and  oral
exposures.  The  subchronlc or   partial  lifetime RfD 1s  an  estimate of  an
exposure  level   that would not  be  expected  to  cause  adverse  effects  when
exposure occurs  during a  limited  time  Interval  I.e.,  for an  Interval  that
does  not  constitute a  significant  portion  of the  Hfespan.  This  type  of
exposure estimate  has  not been  extensively used,  or rigorously defined  as
previous risk assessment  efforts have  focused  primarily on  lifetime exposure
scenarios.  Animal data  used  for  subchronlc estimates  generally  reflect
exposure durations of  30-90  days.   The  general  methodology for  estimating
subchronlc RfDs  Is  the same as  traditionally  employed for  chronic  estimates,
except that subchronlc  data are utilized  when available.

    In the case  of suspected  carcinogens,  RfDs are  not estimated.   Instead,
a  carcinogenic  potency   factor,  or   q-|*   {U.S.  EPA,  1980),  1s  provided.
These potency  estimates  are  derived  for  both oral  and Inhalation  exposures
where possible.  In addition, unit  risk  estimates for air  and drinking  water
are presented  based on  Inhalation and oral  data,  respectively.

    Reportable quantities  (RQs)  based on both chronic toxlclty  and carclno-
genlclty are derived.  The RQ  Is  used  to determine  the quantity of a hazard-
ous substance  for  which   notification  Is  required 1n the event  of  a  release
as  specified  under  the   Comprehensive  Environmental Response,  Compensation
and Liability  Act  (CERCLA).   These two  RQs  (chronic toxlclty  and carclno-
genlclty) represent two of six scores developed  (the remaining  four  reflect
1gn1tab1lHy,   reactivity, aquatic  toxlclty,  and  acute mammalian  toxlclty).
Chemical-specific RQs reflect the lowest of  these six primary criteria.   The
methodology for  chronic   toxlclty and  cancer  based  RQs  are  defined  In  U.S.
EPA, 1984b and 1986b,  respectively.
                                      111

-------
                               EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    Thlram  (137-26-8)   Is  a  white  crystalline  solid  at  room  temperature
(Hawley, 1981).  It 1s  Insoluble  In water  but  soluble  In  benzene,  chloroform
and  carbon  dlsulflde.   Thlram Is  manufactured  by  UC8  Chemicals  Corp.  1n
Bucks,  AL,  and Goodyear  Tire and  Rubber   In  Akron,  OH  (SRI,  1987;  USITC,
1987).  During 1982, a  minimum of  2.29 million  pounds  of  thlram was consumed
In the United  States (HSDB,  1988); ~97X of the  thlram  consumed  1n  the United
States Is used as a rubber accelerator (IARC,  1976).
    If released to the  atmosphere, thlram  Is expected  to  exist  partly In the
vapor  phase  and  partly  In  participate   form  (Hartley  and   Kldd,  1983;
Elsenrelch et  al.,  1981).   The dominant  removal mechanism  for  thlram 1n the
vapor  phase  appears  to  be  reaction  with   photochemically generated hydroxyl
radicals.   The half-life  for  this   reaction  has been  estimated. to be  71
minuted (Atkinson,  1985;  1987).   Dry deposition  may  be a  significant  route
of removal  for partlculate-phase  thlram.    Because of  Us  ability  to absorb
sunlight, direct  photolysis  1s  also a  potential removal  process for  both
vapor- and partlculate-phase  thlram.   If  released to  water or soil,  thlram
1s expected to decompose by  chemical  and microblal action to  dlmethy1d1th1o-
carbamate (Munnecke and Mlckall.  1967;  Richardson, 1954; Shirkot  and Gupta,
1985;  Kluge,   1969a,b;  Rajagopal  et  al..   1984).   Under  acidic  conditions,
chemical  processes  should dominate.  Under anaerobic  conditions,  thlram has
been  found  to  blodegrade  to  dlmethylamlne,  carbon  dlsulflde  and  hydrogen
sulflde  (Williams, 1977).  Volatilization  from water or soil  surfaces Is not
expected  to  be  an  Important fate   process.    This  compound  should  adsorb
moderately to  suspended solids and sediments  In  water.  In  general,  thlram
1s  expected   to  have   low  mobility 1n  soil,  although  potential  exists  for
                                      1v

-------
movement through  some  soils (Rajagopal  et  al.,  1984; Helling  et  al.,  1974;
Relnbold et  al.,  1979).   The half-life  of  thlram In soil has  been  found to
vary from  <1  day to >32  weeks,  with the rate of  degradation  depending upon
such  variables  as   pH,   humus   content  and  Initial  concentration  of  the
compound (Shirkot and Gupta, 1985;  Griffith and  Matthews,  1969; Chlnn,  1973;
Richardson, 1954; Kluge,  1969a).
    Pertinent  data  regarding   human   exposure   to   thlram  were  extremely
limited.   The U.S.  EPA   STORET  data  base  contained no  data  regarding  the
detection  of  thlram  In  water,   aquatic  biota or  sediment  samples.  Because
t hi ram  is  used as a fungicide  In  fruit  plants,  It was analyzed  for  but  not
found  In  samples  of  sweet  cherries   and  peaches  grown  domestically  In
Ontario, Canada,  between 1983  and  1984. The  detection  limit  for  thlram In
this study was 0.01  mg/kg (Frank et al., 1987).
    The  96-hour  TL  of  thlram  1n  finger!Ing channel  catfish was  reported
as  0.79  rag/l  (McKce  and  Wolf,   1963).   The  26-hour  LD5Q   of  thlram  to
Daphnla  magna was  1.3 ppm (frear  and  Boyd,  1967).  The  48-hour  LC5Q  of
thlram  to  Tublfex  tublfex  was 0.67  mg/i  (Voronkln and   Loshakov,  1973).
Tooby  et  al.  (1975)  reported a  96-hour  LC5Q  of 0.007  mg/i  (based  on
concentration  of  product) for  harlequin fish, Rasbora heteromorpha.  exposed
to a  thlram-contalnlng  product  with BOX active  Ingredient  under  flowthrough
conditions.   Tooby  et  al.  (1975)  estimated a  3-month  LC5_  of 0.001  mg/8.
from an extrapolation of the acute  test results.
    Schneider  (1979)  reported  96-hour  LCrgS   of  0.13  and  0.4  ppm  for
rainbow  trout,  Salmo galrdnerl. exposed to  solutions of thlram  (99  and  7S%
active  ingredient,   respectively).   Exposure  of  blueglll   sunflsh,  Lepomls
macrochlrus.  to  thlram   (99  and 75X  active  Ingredient)  generated  96-hour
LC5Qs  of  0.045  and 0.28 ppm,   respectively.   The  96-hour  LC5Qs  (based  on

-------
active Ingredients) for  two  products  each containing an  80% level  of thiram
but 20X levels of dissimilar  Inactive  Ingredients  to  the  freshwater mollusc,
Lymnaea stagnalls.  were  12 and 8.9  ppm for products A and  B,  respectively,
1n aqueous  solutions  (Bluzat et al.,  1981).   The 96-hour LC5Qs  for  acetone
suspensions of products A and B were 2.8 and 3.2 ppm,  respectively.
    Exposure of  scud,  Garomarus  pulex.  to 10, 5, 2 and 1  ppm of  a commercial
product containing  BOX thiram resulted  In 95, 79,  48  and  25X mortality after
10 days  (Bluzat  et al., 1982a).   Groups  of scud (n=130 and  190) exposed  to
0.7 ppm aqueous  suspensions  of thiram  1,  48 and 96  hours after  preparation
of  the test  solutions  experienced 84.6,  91.5  and  SOX mortality  levels,
respectively,  after  96  hours  of  treatment.    The   96-hour  LC5Qs  for  two
commercial  thiram-containing  products  (80X active Ingredient)  to  G.  pulex
were  0.20  ppm and  0.13  ppm  for products A  and B, respectively, in  aqueous
solutions  {Bluzat  et  al., 1982b).   The 96-hour LC5Qs for  products A  and  B
In acetone were 0.22 and 0.06 ppm,  respectively.   The  approximate  median
lethal times  for G. pulex exposed  to  0.02, 0.025, 0.035, 0.05 and 0.08  ppm
solutions  of  thiram were 30,  8.5,  6.5, 4.5  and 5  days, respectively (Bluzat
and Seuge,  1983).   Scud  offered bean seeds  treated with  3000 and 10,000  ppm
thiram demonstrated 90X survival  after 3-3.5  days   and  10X survival  after
29-36  days.   Scud  offered mosses  treated with  50-10,000 ppm thiram  demon-
strated 90X survival after  2.4-5.4 days and 10X survival after 9-27  days.
    The 96-hour  LC5Qs  for the flatworm,   Dugesla  gonocephala,   the  Isopod,
Asellus  aquaticus.  and  the  amphibian, Xenopus  laevls.   at two  stages  of
development  {47  and 53) were  0.048,  61,  0.013 and  0.021 ppm,  respectively
(Seuge  et   al.,   1983).   The  96-hour  LC5Q   for   mayfly   larvae,   Cloeon
dlpterum.  exposed  to  freshly  prepared  solutions of  thiram  was  1.01  mg/i.
                                      v1

-------
Solutions  of  thlram aged  for 1,  7  and  36  hours produced  mortality levels
among mayfly larvae of 79.5,  64.7  and  45.3%,  respectively, after 96 hours of
exposure (Seuge and Bluzat, 1983).
    The  respective  ECn,  ECcn  and  EC,nn  for  Daphnla  magna  exposed  to
                       U     DU         IUU         	  —
tetramethylthluram  dlsulflde  were  0.05,   0.06  and 0.8 yg/i  (Knle  et  al.,
1983).   3ouany  et  al.  (1985)   reported  0%  mortality for  the water  flea,
Daphnla  magna.  carp,  Cyprlnus  carplo.  and  zebraflsh, Brachyodanlo  rerlo.
exposed  to  <0.1,   1.0   and   0.1  mg/i   after   24   hours.    Zebraflsh  fed
thlram-contaminated daphnlds  experienced  a linear Increase In mortality from
0-100%  between 4 and  8 days  after  the  Initiation  of the  experiment.   The
96- and  48-hour  LC5Qs  for  gupples,  Poecllla  retlculata.  and  daphnlds,
Daphnla  magna.  exposed  to  thlram were   0.27  and 0.21   mg/l,  respectively
(Van  Leeuwen  et al.,  1985a).  The 24-hour LC5Q  of  thlram  (>98%  purity)  to
rainbow  trout,  Salmo   qalrdnerl.  weighing   34.0 g   was   0.26  mg/i.    The
24-hour  LCrQ  for trout  weighing -47 g was  0.30  mg/l (Van Leeuwen  et  al.,
1986a).  Exposure of trout  to thlram  also resulted In.significant changes 1n
several blood parameters.
    The  21-day  LCcn  for  thlram 1n  the  water  flea,   Daphnla  magna. was  8
                  3D                                    —		 -
pg/l  (Van  Leeuwen  et  al.,  1985b).   The lowest  tested  concentration  that
resulted  1n  a  decrease  1n   fecundity   was  10   vg/i.   The  lowest  tested
concentration  that  resulted  In  a decrease In size of  daphnlds  after 21  days
was  1.8 jig/i.   There  were  no  significant  effects  on daphnlds  exposed  to
1 iig/s, of thlram over the 21-day study.
    The  60-day  LC—  for  embryolarval   stages   of   rainbow  trout,  Salmo
galrdnerl.   exposed   to   thlram  was 1.1  ^g/l  (Van Leeuwen  et  al.,  1986b).
The  60-day  EC,.-  based   on   mortality  and   teratogenesls  was  0.64

-------
The lowest concentrations at which  there  were  no  observable effects based on
mortality, total  embryotoxIcHy,  length  and weight  were 1.0, <0.32,  <0.32
and  0.56  jig/4,  respectively.    Exposure   of  juvenile   rainbow  trout  to
thlram  for 21  days  resulted  In  a concentration-related  loss  of  glycogen 1n
the  liver  at  >25  yg/l  and  was  associated  with  reduced  body weight  gain.
At  100  jig/i,  thlram  Induced  a  proliferation   of  bile  duct   epithelial
cells  both  with and  without  formation of  new ductules.   Cell necrosis  was
observed occasionally, and hemorrhages were  apparent  1n the  brain and  spinal
cord  at 5  yg/l (Van  Leeuwen et al., 1986c).   Thlram  Is  not  expected  to
bloaccumulate  significantly  In aquatic organisms based  on an  estimated  BCF
value of 90.8.
    Hotlllty and topophototaxls of  Euglena ara_c_1.11s_were  Inhibited  to  50% of
control  organisms  within  30  minutes  of  exposure  to 10"* M solutions  of
tetramethylthluram dlsulflde (Dlehn and TolHn, 1967). Cultures of  the green
alga, ^cenedesmus  acutus,  exposed  to  10  and   100  ppm  tetramethylthluram
dlsulflde were  dead  after 1 and  3 days,  respectively.  The NOEL appears  to
be <0.5  ppm.   Gangawane  and  Kulkarnl  (1979)  reported a  25.4% reduction  In
growth  for  cultures  of  Nostoe  sp.  exposed to  500 ppm  thlram and a  14.1%
reduction  In   growth  for  cultures of  TolypothMx   sp.  exposed  to 100  ppm
thlram.  Hutber et al.  (1979)  reported that growth  of four  species of blue-
green  algae,  Aphanocapsa  (strains  6308 and 6714),  Anabaena  varlablUs  and
Mostoc. was  reduced  by 50% on  exposure  to  50. 100,  50 'and 100  ppm thlram,
respectively.  The concentrations  of thlram  that  Inhibited  growth completely
were 100, >100, 100 and >100 ppm, respectively.
    The minimal active dose  of thlram required to produce  reductions  In  the
number of generations  of  the  dilate protozoan,  Cg1p1d1um campy!urn, was  0.3
mg/l  (D1ve  et  al.,  1980).  The  24-hour  IC5Q for  Chlorella  vulqarls  based
                                     V111

-------
on ATP  levels  was  >2 ppm thlram  (Vasseur et al.,  1982).   Knle et al.  (1983)
reported  an  EC,Q  of  >6  mg/l   for   the   alga,   Haematococcus  pluvlalls.
exposed  to  tetramethylthluram dlsulflde.   Growth  rates  of   the  dilates,
Tetrahymena  thermophlla  and Tetrahymena  pyr1form1s strains,  were  Inhibited
completely at  1.0  mg/l thlratn for all  but  one strain at  28°C  (D1ve  et  al.,
1984}.   Growth  Inhibition  of  amoebae exposed  to  thlram  was achieved  at
concentrations ranging  from 0.5-16  mg/l.   Thlram  at  concentrations  ranging
from  0.25-1.0 mg/l  Induced a  lengthening  of  the generation  time In  heat
                                                                           *,
shock  synchronized  axenlc cultures  of Tetrahymena pyrlformls  (Grollere  and
Dupy-Blanc. 1985).
    The  72-hour  IC5Q  for  growth of   the  green  alga,  Chlorella  vulgarls.
exposed  to  thlram  as determined  by  optical  density at 665  nm  was  -5.5  mg/l
(Jouany  et  al.,  1985).   The  96-hour  EC5Qs  for  the average specific  growth
rate  and  effects   on  the  time-lag  until  maximum  population  growth  In
Chlorefla pyrenoldosa  were  1.0 and  0.03  mg/l,  respectively (Van Leeuwen  et
al.,  1985a).  The  EC5Q for  assimilation of radioactive  bicarbonate  by  £.
pyrenoldosa  was   4.0  mg/l.    The  EC5Q  for  respiration  of  14C   by  C.
pyrenoldosa was >10.0 mg/l.
    Growth of  a  chrysomonad was  Inhibited  completely following  exposure  to
210  jiM  thlram.    Growth  of  the  dilate,  Cyclldlum  sp.,  was  Inhibited
completely at  -180 jjM thlram  (Taylor  and Pace,  1987).  Growth of  a  chloro-
phyte,  Dunallella  tertolectlca.  was  Inhibited at  4 yM thlram  after  7 days.
Growth  of  five other  phytoplankton species was Inhibited  from -0.2-18.6% of
controls  by  exposure  to  4   yH   thlram  for  7  days.   The !5-m1nute  EC5Q
value  for  Photobacterlum phosphoreum  exposed to  thlram  was  0.1 mg/l  (Van
Leeuwen  et  al.,   1985a).   The  lowest  effective   concentration  or  minimum
Inhibiting concentration  of  thlram on  the  nitrification  process of a mixed
culture of Nltrosomonas and Nltrobacter after 3 hours  was  18 mg/l.
                                      1x

-------
    The  oral  LDCfts  for  thlram  In mallard  ducks,  Anas  platyrhynchos.  and
                3U                                   ————  -
ring-necked pheasants, Phaslanus colchlcus. were  >2800  and 673, respectively
(Tucker and  Crabtree,  1970).   Egberts et  al.  (1972) reported  no  statistic-
ally significant  effects  1n Japanese quail, Coturnlx coturnlx.  offered feed
contaminated with 10 ppm thlram  for 11 weeks.   Birds fed 50 ppm contaminated
feed demonstrated significant reductions In numbers  of  eggs  laid and hatched
and shell  thickness  of  eggs.   There were also  significant  reductions  1n the
numbers of lymphocytes, granulocytes and monocytes of blood  from birds dosed
with 50  ppm th1ram-contaminated feed.  Heath  et  al. (1972)  reported  a lack
of mortality  among Japanese  quail,  C..  coturnlx  japonlca.  and  pheasant,  £.
colchlcus.  fed  the  highest  concentration  of  thlram  tested  (5000  ppm  In
feed).    Mallard  ducks,  Anas  platyrhynchos.   fed  mash  containing 5000  ppm
thlram had 20% mortality.
    Lorgue  et  al.   (1975)  reported  that   th1ram-contaminated  feed  (20  gc
Th1rban/10 kg)  caused  Immediate (24 hours)  blockage of egg  laying  In quail
and  regression  of  secondary  sexual  characteristics  1n  males.  Lorgue  and
Soyez  (1976)  reported  that  thlram completely  Inhibited  egg laying by gray
partridges exposed to 1.6  g/kg within 48 hours.   The  Incidence of embryonic
mortality  was  Increased  significantly at 4-fold  lower  doses.   The  ID™ and
LC5Q  of  thlram  to  Japanese  quail,  C.   coturnlx  japonlca.  were  695  and
>10,000  mg/kg,  respectively   (Gruen  et  al.,  1982).   Hadhazy  and  Glavlts
(1982)  reported that  100  and  200  g  th1 ram/100 kg feed caused  Imperfect egg
shell  calcification  and  production of  eggs with  abnormal  size and form In
pheasants.
    Earthworms, El senla foetlda  exposed to  thlram by Immersion had mortality
levels  ranging  from  5%  seven days posttreatment,  to 38%  one hundred and one
days   posttreatment  (Roark   and  Dale,  1979).    Worms   fed  thlram-treated
bermudagrass clippings had  mortality  levels  ranging  from 10% after 34 days

-------
of  treatment  to  42% after  101  days.   Mortality among  worms  reared  1n
th1ram-treated soil ranged from  21% after  10  days  to 98.1% after 29 days and
99.9%  after  52  days.   The  ALO  of  thlram  to  wild-trapped  deer  mice,
Peromyscus manlculatus. was  reported  to be  1600 mg/kg (Schafer  and  Bowles,
1985).
    Although  specific quantitative data concerning the pharmacoklnetlcs  of
thlram  are  limited,  ACGIH  (1986) stated  (without providing  documentation)
that  following absorption,  thlram 1s  widely distributed,  and  1s  predomi-
nantly excreted unchanged  1n  the urine and feces.  Rannug  and  Rannug (1984)
stated  that  thlram and other  dlsulfldes have a tendency  to participate  In
redox-reactlons.   Thlram  Is reduced  by glutathlone to  d1methyld1th1ocarba-
mate, and 1t  may  also Interact with SH-groups of  proteins, which may result
1n the  Inhibition  of  a number of enzymes.  Dalvl  and  Deoras  (1986)  reported
a dose-related  Increase In  the amount of carbon dlsulflde  exhaled following
treatment of rats with an  1ntraper1toneal Injection of  thlram.
    Data  regarding the toxldty  of thlram following  Inhalation  exposure  of
animals were  not  located.   SlvlUskaya (1974, summarized by Flshbeln,  1976)
reported ophthalmologlc changes  In persons occupationally exposed to  thlram.
Exposure concentrations were not reported.
    The  most  notable effect  observed  In  animals following  chronic  oral
exposure  to  thlram 1s  ataxla and hind leg  paralysis  observed In rats  fed
thlram  In the  diet at >300 ppm  (E.I.  Du Pont de Nemours and Co.,  n.d.;  Lee
and  Peters,   1976).   Neurotoxlc  effects   following  exposure  to  thlram  may
result  from  the production of  carbon  dlsulflde.   Thuranszky  et  al.  (1982)
found  similar  effects on  the  nervous system when  rats  were treated with  a
single oral  dose of thlram or  carbon dlsulflde.
                                      x1

-------
    Dietary treatment  of animals  with thlram  has  consistently resulted  In
decreased  food  Intake  and  body  weight  gain.    The  study  by Lowy  et  al.
(1980). which found  that body weight  gain  1n  thlram treated rats was  below
pair-fed controls. Indicates  that  the effect on  body weight Is a result  of
thlram  treatment  rather  than just  a result of  decreased food Intake.   The
lowest  dietary  concentration of  thlram resulting  In  decreased body weight
gain In rats was 100 ppm (Lee et al.,  1978).  A study using  mink and  ferrets
(Hornshaw et al., 1987)  did not clearly Identify  levels  resulting  In  changes
In body weight  because  of the small numbers of animals  used, and  because  of
the high variability  of body weight of the animals used  In the  study.
    Thlram  1s  an Inhibitor  of  mlcrosomal  monoxygenases Including aldehyde
dehydrogenase and dopamlne Q-dehydrogenase.  Combined exposure  to  thlram  and
ethanol has been shown to result In  the accumulation  of  acetaldehyde  (Garcia
de  Torres   et   al.,  1983).   Interactions  between  thlram  and prometazlne,
meprobamate and trlhexyhenldyl  have also  been  reported .(Fenyvesl  et al.,
1985).  Oral cardnogenldty studies of thlram using  rats (Lee  et  al.,  1978;
Takahashl et al., 1983;  Lljlnsky,  1984)  and a limited cardnogenldty  study
using  mice (BRL, 1968a) have  not  found  a carcinogenic  effect.   Lljlnsky
(1984) found that simultaneous oral  treatment of  rats with thlram  and sodium
nitrite  significantly  Increased  nasal cavity and forestomach  tumors.  This
effect probably was  due to the \n_ vivo formation of  N-n1trosod1methylam1ne.
    Kutagenlclty studies of thlram have yielded mixed results,  with numerous
positive and negative  studies available.   Rannug and Rannug (1984) proposed
that  mutagenlclty Induced  by  thlram. may result  from the  Inhibition   of
enzymes that are Involved 1n protecting against  harmful  oxygen  species.

-------
    Oral teratogenldty  studies  using hamsters  (Robens,  1969), mice  (Roll,
1971; Matthlaschk,  1973;  Short et al.,  1976)  and rats (Short et  al.,  1976)
have  reported  an  Increased  Incidence   of  resorptlons   and  malformations
observed prenatally and  reduced  viability and growth, postnatally.  In  some
Instances,  the findings were observed In  the presence of maternal  toxlclty.
    Oral studies  concerning the effects  of thlram  on reproduction 1n  rats
(Short et al., 1976)  Indicate  that at  132 mg/kg/day  the  30% of the males who
survived,  failed   to  Inseminate  females   and   some exhibited   testlcular
lesions.  This dose also  caused  mortality.  A dose  of 30 mg/kg/day  given to
females  reduced   the   number  of  Implants/dam.   Treatment  at  96  mg/kg/day
resulted 1n  only  1  of  the 15  female  survivors to  mate  successfully.   A
cross-fostering  experiment  (Short  et   al.,  1976),  which   found  reduced
survival of offspring  from  untreated dams  placed  with treated dams Indicates
that developing rats  are  still sensitive to thlram  postnatally.   Results of
a  reproductive  study  using  mink  and   ferrets   (Hornshaw  et   al.,   1987)
Indicates  that ferrets  may be  more  sensitive  than mink  or rats  to  the
reproductive effects  of thlram; 0/12  female  ferrets  produced litters  at  a
dose of 7 mg/kg/day.
    Thlram  was assigned  to  EPA  group   D:   not  classifiable as  to   human
cardnogen1c1ty.   An  RfO  for subchronlc   and  chronic oral  exposure  of  0.006
mg/kg/day  was  derived  from the  NOAEL  for  reproductive effects  1n  female
ferrets  of 0.61  mg/kg/day   1n  the  study by  Hornshaw et  al. (1987).   The
verified oral  RfD  of   0.005  (U.S.  EPA, 1987c)  1s  based on an unpublished 2-
year  study  In  rats (E.I. Dupont  de  Nemours & Co.  Inc.,  n.d.) derived  from
the  NOEL of  5 mg/kg/day  for weakness, atoxla, varying degrees of  hind  11mb
paralysis,  and calcified masses In the basal  gonglla and  1n  the cerebellum.
                                     X111

-------
Both  RfDs  are well  below the  boundary line  for adverse  effects  when  the
available  data  are  plotted   In  dose/duration-effect  graphs.   In  addition,
exposure to  2.1  ntg/kg/day produced  a decrease  In  the number of offspring/
Utter and  1n offspring  body  weights.   In the  adult  animals,  there was  an
Increase 1n  splenic  weight at 2.1  and  7 mg/kg/day  and  a decrease  In  RBCs,
hemoglobin and hematocrlt at  7 mg/kg/day.
    Freshwater criteria  calculated  for  aquatic  toxldty  were a Final  Acute
Value  of  20.4   yg/i,   a  Final   Chronic   Value  of  0.0256   yg/t.  and   a
Final Acute-Chronic Ratio of 797.91.  The Final  Plant  Value was estimated  at
0.03 mg/l.   Data were not sufficient for estimating  saltwater  criteria.
    An RQ of  100  pounds  was  derived for chronic  toxldty based on  reproduc-
tive  effects  In  female  ferrets  (Hornshaw  et  al..  1987).   Data  were not
sufficient for derivation of  a cancer-based  RQ.
                                     xW

-------
                             TABLE  OF  CONTENTS
                                                                       Page
1.  INTRODUCTION	    1

    1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER	    1
    1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES 	    1
    1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA	    2
    1.4.   USE DATA	    2
    1.5.   SUMMARY	    3

2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT	    4

    2.1.   AIR	    4
                                                                     *»

           2.1.1.   Reaction with Hydroxyl Radicals 	    4
           2.1.2.   Reaction with Ozone 	    4
           2.1.3.   Photolysis	    4
           2.1.4.   Physical Removal Processes	    4

    2.2.   HATER	    5

           2.2.1.   Chemical Degradation	    5
           2.2.2.   Mlcroblal Degradation 	    5
           2.2.3.   Volatilization	    5
           2.2.4.   Adsorption	    5

    2T3.   SOIL	    6

           2.3.1.   Chemical Degradation	    6
           2.3.2.   Volatilization	    6
           2.3.3.   Adsorption	    6
           2.3.4.   Persistence 	 	    6

    2.4.   SUMMARY	    8

3.  EXPOSURE	   10

4.  ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY	   11

    4.1.   AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY 	   11

           4.1.1.   Acute Toxic Effects on Fauna	   11
           4.1.2.   Chronic Effects on Fauna	   16
           4.1.3.   Effects on Flora	   18
           4.1.4.   Effects on Bacteria 	   22

    4.2.   TERRESTRIAL TOXICOLOGY 	   23

           4.2.1.   Effects on Fauna	   23
           4.2.2.   Effects on Flora	   25
                                     xv

-------
                         TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  (cont.)

                                                                       Page
    4.3.   FIELD STUDIES	   25
    4.4.   AQUATIC RISK ASSESSMENT	   25
    4.5.   SUMMARY	   30

5.  PHARHACOKINETCS	   36

    5.1.   ABSORPTION	   36
    5.2.   DISTRIBUTION	   36
    5.3.   METABOLISM	   36
    5.4.   EXCRETION	   38
    5.5.   SUMMARY	   38

6.  EFFECTS	   39

    6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	   39

           6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposure 	   39
           6.1.2.   Oral Exposure	   39
           6.1.3.   Other Relevant Information	   45

    6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY	   48

           6.2.1.   Inhalation	   48
           6.2.2.   Oral. . .	   48
           6.2.3.   Other Relevant Information	   50

    6.3.   NUTAGENICITY	   50
    6.4.   TERATOGENICITY	   54
    6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS 	   58
    6.6.   SUMMARY	   61

7.  EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS 	   64

    7.1.   HUMAN	   64
    7.2.   AQUATIC	   64

8.  RISK ASSESSMENT	   65

    8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY	   65

           8.1.1.   Inhalation	   65
           8.1.2.   Oral	   65
           8.1.3.   Other Routes	   66
           8.1.4.   Weight of Evidence	   66
           8.1.5.   Quantitative Risk Estimates 	   66

    8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	   66

           8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure 	   66
           8.2.2.   Oral Exposure	   67
                                     xvl

-------
                          TABLE OF CONTENTS  (cont.)

                                                                        Page
 9.  REPORTABLE QUANTITIES 	    75

     9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY 	    75
     9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY	    81

10.  REFERENCES	    82

APPENDIX A: LITERATURE SEARCHED	102
APPENDIX B: SUMMARY TABLE FOR THIRAM 	   105
APPENDIX C: DOSE/DURATION RESPONSE GRAPH(S)  FOR EXPOSURE  TO THIRAM .  .   106
                                     xv11

-------
                               LIST  OF TABLES
No.                               Title                                Page
6-1     Acute Tox1c1ty of  Thlrara	   46
6-2     Hutagenldty and GenotoxIcUy Testing of Thlram	   51
9-1     Toxlclty Summary for  Oral  Exposure  to Thlram	   76
9-2     Composite Scores for  Oral  Exposure  to Thlram	   79
9-3     Minimum Effective  Dose (MED) and  Reportable Quantity (RQ) . .   80
                                   xvlll

-------
                               LIST OF  FIGURES

No.                               Title                                Page

2-1     Degradation Pathways of Thlram and Zlram 1n Soil and
        \n Mlcroblal Cultures 	    9
4-1     Organization Chart for Listing GMAVs, GMCVs and BCFs
        Required to Derive Numerical Water Quality Criteria
        by the Method of U.S. EPA/OURS (1986) for the Protection
        of Freshwater Aquatic Life from Exposure to Thlram	   27

4-2     Example Computer Program In BASIC Language for Calculating
        the Final Acute Value 	   28

4-3     Summary Chart for Data Required to Generate Criteria by
        the Method of U.S. EPA/OWRS (1986) for Safe Levels of
        Thlram In Aquatic Environments	   29

5-1     Two-Step Reduction of Thlram to D1methy1d1th1ocarbamate
        Ion	   37
                                     xlx

-------
                             LIST  OF  ABBREVIATIONS
AEL                     Adverse effect level
ALD                     Approximate lethal dose
ATP                     Adenoslne 5'-tr1phosphate
BCF                     Bloconcentratlon factor
BUN                     Blood urea nitrogen
CAS                     Chemical Abstract Service
CHO                     Chinese hamster ovary
CMC                     Carboxymethyl cellulose
CNS                     Central nervous system
CS                      Composite score
DNSO                    Dimethyl sulfoxide
DNA                     Oeoxyrlbonuclelc add
ECso                    Concentration effective to 50% of recipients
      ~~                 (and all other subscripted concentration levels)
PEL                     Frank effect level
GMAV                    Genus mean acute values
GMCV                    Genus mean chronic values
IC5Q                    Median Inhibition concentration
Koc                     Soil sorptlon coefficient
Kow                     Octanol/water partition coefficient
LC5Q                    Concentration lethal to-50% of recipients
                        (and all other subcrlpted dose levels)
LEL                     Lowest effect level
1050                    Dose lethal to 50% of recipients
                        (and all other subscripted dose levels)
LOAEL                   Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level
                                      xx

-------
                         LIST OF  ABBREVIATIONS (cont.)
NED                     Minimum effective dose
NPI                     Maximum permissible Intake
MTD                     Maximum tolerated dose
NADP                    N1cot1nam1de adenlne dlnucleotlde
NOAEL                   No-observed-adverse-effect level
NOEL                    No-observed-effect level
PCV                     Packed cell volume
PEL                     Permissible exposure level
PNS                     Peripheral nervous system
ppm                     Parts per million
RBC                     Red blood cell chollnesterase
RfD                     Reference dose
RQ                      Reportable quantity
RV
-------
                               1.   INTRODUCTION
1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUN8ER
    Thlram 1s  currently  referred  to by CAS as  thloperoxydlcarbonlc  dlamlde,
tetramethyl (SANSS, 1988).  This compound  1s also  known  as  b1s(d1methylth1o-
carbamyl)d1sulf1de, tetramethylthluram  dlsulflde,  thluram and THTD  (Hawley,
1981).   Trade  names  for this  compound Include  Arasan,  Fernlde,  Fernasan,
Pomarsol,  Thlanosan,  AAplrol  AAtack,  Hexathlr,  Hercuram,  Poraarsol  forte,
Chlpco  Thlram  75, Polyram-Ultra,  Thlramad,  Trlpomol,  Tuads,  Tersan  75,
Thylate, Vanclde-TM and  Vanclde TM-95 (SANSS,  1988; Hartley and  Kldd,  1983;
SRI,  1987;  Melster, 1988)).  The  structure,  CAS Registry number,  empirical
formula and molecular  weight of this compound  are as follows:
                             CH3    S     S   CH3
                                \   n     n  /
                                 N-C-S-S-C-N
                                /           \
                             CH3             CH3

Molecular weight:  240.42
Empirical formula:  CgH.JI-S^
CAS Registry number:  137-26-8
1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
    Thlram Is  a  white  crystalline  solid at room temperature, with  a charac-
teristic odor  (Hawley,  1981).   It  1s  soluble  1n water,  benzene, chloroform
and carbon  dlsulflde,  and  Insoluble  1n dilute  alkali  and aliphatic  hydro-
carbons  (IARC,  1976).   Selected   physical  and  chemical properties are  as
follows:
Melting point:       155-156°C                      Wlndholz.  1983
                     146°C (commercial grade)        Wlndholz,  1983
Boiling point:       129°C (20 mm Hg)               IARC,  1976
0133d                               -1-                              02/22/89

-------
Hater solubility:
Log Kow:
Vapor pressure:
Density:
30 mg/t (room temperature)
not available
<7.5xlO"» mm Hg (20°C)
1.29 g/cm* (20°C)
Worthing and Walker, 1983

Hartley and K1dd, 1983
Worthing and Walker, 1983
Chemically,  thlram will  be oxidized  by  strong  oxidizing  agents  and  will
decompose 1n the presence of strong adds (HSDB, 1988).
1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA
    Thlram  Is  believed  to be  produced  commercially In the  United  States  by
passing  chlorine  gas through  a  solution  of sodium  d1methyld1th1ocarbamate
(IARC,  1976).   It  1s manufactured  In  the  United States  by UCB  Chemicals
Corp.  1n Bucks,  AL,  and  Goodyear T1re and  Rubber  In  Akron, OH  (SRI,  1987;
USITC, 1987).  During 1982, consumption  of thlram  1n  the  United  States was a
minimum of 2.29 million pounds (HSDB, 1988).
1.4.   JSE DATA
    According  to   IARC  (1976), -97% of the thlram consumed  In the  United
States  1s  used  as  a   primary   and secondary  accelerator  In   compounding
natural,   1sobuty1ene-1soprene,    butadiene,   styrene-butadlene,   synthetic
Isoprene  and  nitrlle-butadlene  rubbers.    Thlram renders  low  sulfur  and
sulfurless  stock  less heat-resistant,  1s nondlscolorlng and nonstalnlng,  and
1s  an excellent activator  of  guanldlnes,  amines  and  thlazoles.   Thlram  1s
also  used as  a  cure retarder  for Neoprene  G  rubbers (IARC, 1976).   Other
applications Include  use  as  a  fungicide (on seeds, fruits,  nuts,  vegetables
and ornamental crops, and on paper, polyurethane  foam and  textiles),  animal
repellent,  bacterlostat  1n  soap  and   antiseptic  sprays,  antl-oxldant  In
polyolefln  plastics,  and peptlzlng  agent  1n polysulphlde  elastomers  (IARC,
1976).
0133d
               -2-
                 03/21/89

-------
1.5.   SUHMARY
    Thlram  (137-26-8)   Is  a  white  crystalline  solid  at  room  temperature
(Hawley, 1981).  It Is  Insoluble  In water  but  soluble  1n  benzene,  chloroform
and  carbon  dlsulflde.   Thlram 1s  manufactured  by  UCB  Chemicals  Corp.  1n
Bucks,  AL,  and Goodyear  Tire and  Rubber  In  Akron,  OH  (SRI,  1987;  USITC.
1987).  During 1982, a  minimum of  2.29 million  pounds  of  thlram was  consumed
In the  United States (HSDB, 1988); ~97X  of the  thlram  consumed  In  the  United
States  Is used as  a rubber accelerator (IARC,  1976).

0133d                               -3-                              02/22/89

-------
                     2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT

    Limited experimental data  regarding  the  environmental  fate and transport
of  thlram  were located 1n the available  literature.   Therefore,  predictions
concerning environmental  fate  and transport of  this  compound were  based  on
theoretical calculations using physical properties or  molecular structure.
2.1.   AIR
    It can be assumed  from  Us  vapor  pressure of <7.5xlO~*  mm Hg  at  20°C
{Hartley and  Kldd,  1983} that  thlram would  exist mostly  In  the  participate
form  and  partly  1n  the  vapor  form  In  the atmosphere  (Elsenrelch  et  al.,
1981).
2.1.1.   Reaction  with  Hydroxyl  Radicals.   Using the  method  of  Atkinson
(1987),  the   rate constant  for   the  reaction  of  thlram  vapor  with  photo-
chemical ly generated hydroxyl  radicals  1n the atmosphere  Is estimated  to  be
3.23xl(Ti0   cma/molecule-sec  at  25°C.    Assuming   an   average   ambient
hydroxyl   radical   concentration  of    S.OxlO9   molecules/cm9   (Atkinson,
1985), the hydroxyl reaction half-life 1s estimated to be 71 minutes.
2.1.2.   Reaction with  Ozone.   Thlram Is  not  expected to  be  susceptible  to
reaction with ozone molecules 1n the atmosphere (U.S.  EPA,  1987a).
2.1.3.   Photolysis.   At  a  concentration of  100  mg/l  In methanol,  thlram
has been  found to absorb UV light In the environmentally significant  range
(wavelengths >290 nm)  (Gore  et al., 1971).   This  suggests  that thlram may  be
susceptible  to  direct  photolysis  1n  the  atmosphere,  although  no  data
regarding the rate of this reaction are available In the  literature.
2.1.4.   Physical  Removal  Processes.   Dry  deposition  may be  a  route  of
removal for partlculate-phase thlram 1n the atmosphere.
0133d                               -4-                              02/22/89

-------
2.2.   WATER
2.2.1.   Chemical  Degradation.   Thlram  is  reported  to  decompose  In  acidic
media  (Hartley  and K1dd,  1983;  Worthing and  Walker, 1983).   This Informa-
tion,  as  well  as data  pertaining  to  the  persistence of  thlram  In  soil,
suggests  that  chemical processes  such  as hydrolysis  1n acidic  medium will
contribute  to  the decomposition of  thlram  In  natural waters.   Since  thlram
absorbs  light   1n  the environmentally  significant  region  (>290 mm)  (HSDB,
1988),  H  has  the potential  to  undergo direct photolysis  In  surface  waters
when  exposed  to  sunlight.    Rate  data  that  would  permit  estimation  of
half-lives for hydrolysis and photolysis are not available In the literature.
2.2.2.   Mlcroblal Degradation.  Results  of  a  study using  the  Japanese HITI
test  protocol   Indicate  that  thlram Is  resistant  to  blodegradatlon  under
aerobic conditions;  <30% degradation was  observed  when  100 ppm thlram  was
Incubated with  30 ppm activated sludge for  2  weeks  (Sasaki, 1978;  Kawasaki,
1980)." Degradation   of   thlram  to d1methylam1ne,  carbon  dlsulflde  and
hydrogen  sulflde  by  rumlnal  microorganisms  Indicates  that  thlram may  be
susceptible  to  blodegradatlon under anaerobic conditions  1n the environment
(Williams, 1977).
2.2.3.   Volatilization.    Henry's  Law  constant   for  thlram  has   been
estimated  to be <7.9xlO~8  atm-mVmol  based  on  a  water  solubility  of  30
mg/i  at  room  temperature  and  a  vapor  pressure  of  <7.5xlO~€  mm  Hg  at
20°C.  This  value  for  Henry's  Law  constant'suggests  that volatilization from
water surfaces would not  be a significant fate process (Thomas,  1982).
2.2.4.   Adsorption.    A  soil  adsorption  coefficient  of 672  was  estimated
for  thlram  using the following  regression  equation  (Lyman, 1982):  log  K
=  -0.55 log  S  + 3.64.    Based  on  this  K    value,  thlram Is expected  to
adsorb moderately to suspended sol  Ids and sediments In water.
0133d
-5-
02/22/89

-------
2.3.   SOIL
2.3.1.   Chemical Degradation.   It  appears  that  the chemical  decomposition
of  thlram  In  aerobic  soil  may  be a  significant  process  (Kluge,  1969a).
Because of  Us  ability to absorb  light  of wavelength >290 mm  (HSD8,  1988},
direct photolysis on soil  surfaces 1s a potential  loss process.
2.3.2.   Volatilization.   Moderate  adsorption  of  thlram  to   soil   and  a
relatively  low  value   for  Henry's  Law  constant   (<7.9xl(T8  atm-mVmol  at
20-25*0) suggest that volatilization from moist soil  surfaces would not  be a
significant  fate  process.   The  low vapor pressure  of  thlram  suggests  that
volatilization from dry soil  surfaces also would be Insignificant.
2.3.3.   Adsorption.  Thlram has  been  found  to be  Immobile  1n  a black  clay
and a red sandy  loam soil, but  was  more  mobile In  peat  moss  and particularly
In  loamy  sand  soil (Rajagopal  et  al.,  1984).  These  observations  are  In
agreement with  an  estimated  K    value  of 672, which Indicates  low mobility
In  sofT.   Helling  et  al.  (1974)  employed  bloassay  methods  In  combination
with  soil  TLC  to  study  the mobility  of thlram  In sllty  clay loam.   The
overall mean Rf value  for  this  compound  was determined  to  be 0.73, which
Indicates moderate  mobility  In  this  soil  (Relnbold et  al.,   1979).  These
data  Indicate  that  In general  thlram  has low mobility 1n soil, although  H
may show moderate mobility 1n certain soils.
2.3.4.   Persistence.    It  appears that  thlram Is  degraded  In  soil  by  both
blotlc  and  abiotic mechanisms,  with  the  rate of  degradation  depending  on
such  variables  as  pH,  soil  type (humus content) and  concentration of  thlram
(Munnecke  and  Hlckall,  1967;  Richardson,   1954;  Shlrkot and  Gupta, 1985;
Kluge,  1969a,b;  Rajagopal  et  al.,   1984).   Thlram added  to alluvial sandy
loam  at an  Initial  concentration  of  300 ppm underwent  16X degradation  In
autoclaved  soil and  25%  In nonautoclaved  soil   In  24  hours  (Shlrkot  and

0133d                               -6-                              02/22/89

-------
Gupta,  1985).   In  autoclaved  and nonautoclaved  alluvial  sandy  loam Inocu-
lated with Pseudomonas aeruglnosa. thlram at  an  Initial  concentration of 300
ppm  had a  half-life of  8  days  and  underwent  90%  degradation  In  24  days
(Shlrkot and  Gupta, 1985).  At an  Initial  concentration of  125  ppm, thlram
had  a half-life  of 1 day when  distributed  evenly  throughout  a  soil  (45X
moisture  content)  (Griffith  and  Matthews,   1969).   In  contrast,  the  same
amount  of  thlram  added  to the soil In the form of  a  dressing on  the  surface
of  0.7  mm glass  beads  was much  more  persistent, undergoing only  about 10%
degradation In  21 days  (Griffith and  Matthews,  1969).   In a  study by Chlnn
(1973), the persistence  of thlram In  loam soil  was  measured quantitatively
using  a  method  that  Incorporated  some  features  of  the  cylinder-plate
technique used for  assaying  antibiotics.  Thlram  was  applied  to  loam  soil  at
concentrations of 100 and 1000 ppm.   Results showed that thlram at  100 ppm
had  a half-life  of -1 week,  while  at 1000  ppm H persisted  longer  than  32
weeks.  It  seems  probable that thlram at 1000 ppm killed  many of the  soil
mlcroflora that are responsible for  degradation of fungicides (Chlnn,  1973).
     In  other  studies, thlram  added  to sandy  soil  at concentrations  of 100
and  200 ppm had  a  half-life of <2 days;  at  a concentration of  50 ppm, the
half-life  ranged  between <2  days to -7 days,  and  when added to  greenhouse
compost soil  at a concentration of  50 ppm, thlram  had a half-life  of <1 day
(Richardson,  1954).   The addition of  thlram  to  soil appeared to  alter the
microbiological balance  of the soil.  Increasing  the number  of bacteria and
decreasing  the  number of  fungi  over  time  (Richardson,  1954; Rajagopal  et
al.,  1984).   Thlram  Is  reported  to decompose  faster In soils with  greater
humus content  (Mendel, 1974).   In soil with  humus  content  <1.2%,  an  Initial
lag  1n  the  decomposition  of  thlram was observed  (Kluge,  19695).   Thlram has
been  found to decompose faster  In soil with  a lower pH.   In humus sandy soil
at  pH 3.5,  thlram was largely decomposed after 4-5 weeks, while  In the same
0133d
-7-
08/24/89

-------
soil at  pH 7.0,  thlram decomposed  after 14-15  weeks  (Kluge,  1969a).   The
proposed  degradation  pathway  for  thlram In  soil  1s  shown  In Figure  2-1
(Rajagopal et al., 1984).
2.4.   SUMMARY
    If released to the atmosphere, thlram Is  expected to  exist partly In the
vapor  phase  and  partly  In  participate  form  (Hartley  and  K1dd,  1983;
Elsenrelch et al., 1981).   The dominant removal mechanism  for  thlram 1n the
vapor phase  appears  to  be  reaction  with photochemically generated  hydroxyl
radicals.   The  half-life  for  this  reaction  has  been  estimated  to be  71
minutes (Atkinson, 1985; 1987}. Dry  deposition  may be a  significant  route of
removal  for   partlculate-phase  thlram.   Because   of  Its ability to  absorb
sunlight,  direct  photolysis  Is  also  a  potential  removal  process   for  both
vapor- and partlculate-phase  thlram.  If released to  water or  soil,  thlram
Is expected to decompose by chemical and  mlcroblal action to dlmethyldlthlo-
carbamate  (Munnecke and  Mlckall,  1967; Richardson, 1954; Shlrkot and Gupta,
1985;  Kluge,  1969a,b;  Rajagopal  et  al., 1984).   Under  acidic  conditions,
chemical  processes  should  dominate. Under  anaerobic conditions, thlram has
been  found to  blodegrade   to  dlmethylamlne,  carbon  dlsulflde  and  hydrogen
sulflde (Williams, 1977).  Volatilization from  water or soil  surfaces Is not
expected  to  be  an  Important fate  process.    This compound  should  adsorb
moderately to suspended  solids and  sediments  In  water.   In  general,  thlram
1s  expected   to  have  low  mobility  In soil,  although  potential exists  for
movement  through  some  soils (Rajagopal et  al., 1984;  Helling  et al.,  1974;
Relnbold  et  al.,  1979).   The  half-life of  thlram In soil  has  been  found to
vary from <1  day to >32 weeks, with the rate  of  degradation  depending  upon
such  variables   as  pH,  humus content   and  Initial  concentration  of  the
compound  (Shlrkot and Gupta. 1985; Griffith and Matthews, 1969;  Chlnn,  1973;
Richardson, 1954; Kluge,  1969a).
0133d
-8-
08/23/89

-------
                CH
                              CM,
                    Ziram
                f
                CH3  S       0

                ODC-flf -ketcbotyrie acid

C*S) NCSCHjCHjCHCOOH

CMj  s       '
                DOC -f •tminabutyrie acid
                         •
                        v
                 S -f CNjSCHjCHjCHCOOH
                              NHj
                    Mcthipnint
                        *
                  S 4 HCHO

                        I
                        V

                      C02
                                 C>CSSC
                                 rM / I!  It \ru
                                   3  S  S     1

                                     Thiran
                                            CH
  V;$
CHj   *»
                                               Heavy rnt tal
                                               eomplexM Hkt
                                               CuOOCj
                         Oimcthyldtthioearbamatf(poO
                                           CH
                           CH

                         DiffiftttylnitrotanMnc
                                     FIGURE 2-1

  Degradation Pathways of Thlram and Zlraro  In Soil and  1n  HUroblal  Cultures

                          Source:  Rajagopal  et al.,  1984
0133d
                       -9-
                               02/22/89

-------
                                 3.  EXPOSURE

    Pertinent  data  regarding  human   exposure   to   thlram  were  extremely
limited.   The  U.S.  EPA STORE!  data base  contained no  data regarding  the
detection  of  thlram 1n water,  aquatic  biota  or  sediment  samples.   Because
thlram  1s  used  as a fungicide  In  fruit  plants,  It was analyzed  for  but  not
found  1n  samples  of   sweet  cherries  and  peaches  grown  domestically  In
Ontario, Canada,  between  1983  and 1984.  The  detection  limit for  thlram In
this study was 0.01 mg/kg (Frank et al., 1987).
    Thlram  Is  used  as  a primary  and  secondary  accelerator In  compounding
rubber  (IARC,  1976).  In a  study by Kru1s-de Vrles et  al.  (1987),  6 of  8
haemodlalysed patients  developed  subacute eczematons dermatitis  In the  area
surrounding the rubber  arterlovenous shunt In the forearm.
    It  Is  also  possible   that  the  dermatitis  was  caused  by  short   and
Intermittent  contact of  the  skin  with  rubber  gloves  used  by   the  nursing
personnel.  Harks  and   Ralney  (1984) conducted  a prospective  study  of  100
surgical patients  to Identify  causes of  contact dermatitis.  Patch  testing
was performed on  11  patients  with post-operative dermatitis  or  a history of
tape allergy.  Two patients  had  reactions  to the tests.
    In  two abstracts  of Russian studies,  workers  exposed to  unspecified
concentrations  of  thlram  exhibited  neural  and  myocardlal  disorders,  a
thyroid  volume  Increase,   upper   respiratory  Infections  and  hematologlcal
alterations (Cherpak et al., 1971; Kaskevlch and Bezugly,  1973).
    Although  thlram  was found  at one  superfund waste site, other  data  on
environmental  fate  and  human  exposure  pathways  were not  located  In  the
available literature (U.S.  EPA,  1987d).
0133d                               -10-                             08/24/89

-------
                         4.  ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
4.1.   AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
4.1.1.   Acute Toxic  Effects  on Fauna.   McKee  and Wolf (1963)  reported  the
results of a  toxtclty test 1n which flngerllng  channel  catfish were exposed
to thlraro at 19°C.  The 96-hour TLffl was 0.79 mg/l.
    Frear and  Boyd  (1967) assessed  the  acute toxldty of  thlram  to Daphnla
magna.   Daphnlds were  exposed  singly  1n  100  ml  solutions   of  thlram  In
4-ounce bottles.  The  solubility of  thlram In test solutions was enhanced by
use of  acetone as a  carrier.   LD50 values were calculated from the results
of 10 definitive assays.  Investigators reported a 26-hour  L05(, of 1.3 ppm.
    Voronkln  and Loshakov (1973)  reported  a  48-hour  LC5Q   of  0.67 mg/i
for TubIfex tubJlex exposed to thlram.
    Tooby et  al.  (1975) assessed  the  toxldty of thlram  (80% active Ingre-
dient  product)  to harlequin  fish,  Rasbora  heteromorpha.   under  flowthrough
conditions.  The  dilution water  had a hardness  of  20  rag/i, a   pH of  8.1  and
a  temperature  of  20°C.   Toxldty  levels were  calculated on  the basis  of
commercial product and not on active  Ingredient.   The 24-, 48- and  96-hour
LC5pS  were  0.02,  0.012 and  0.007 mg/l,  respectively.  The   Investigators
estimated  a  3-month  LC5Q of  0.001  mg/i   from  an  extrapolation  of  the
results of acute studies.
    Schneider  (1979)   reported  24-,  48-  and  96-hour LC5()s  of  0.138,  0.130
and 0.13  ppm  for  rainbow trout,  Salmo  galrdnerl.  exposed to  solutions  of
thlram  (99%  active  Ingredient).   The  respective  LC5Qs  for trout exposed  to
a  th1ram-conta1n1ng  product with 75%  active  Ingredient  were 0.50,  0.40  and
0.40 ppm.  Exposure of  blueglll  sunflsh,  Lepomls  macrochlrus.  to thlram (99%
active  Ingredient) generated  24-,  48- and 96-hour  LC5Qs  of 0.21, 0.093  and
0.045  ppm,  respectively.  The  respective  LC5Qs  for  sunflsh   exposed  to  a
0133d                               -11-                             02/22/89

-------
product  containing  75%  thlram were  0.71, 0.31  and 0.28  ppm.  Tests  were
conducted  under  static  conditions  In 15  i, of  reconstituted water at  12°C
for trout and 18*C for sunflsh.
    Bluzat  et  al.  (1981)  assessed  the  acute  toxUHy of  two  commercial
thlram-contalnlng  products   (product  A  and  product B) to  the  freshwater
mollusc, Lymnaea  staqnalls.   Each product  contained  an  8054  level  of  thlram
but 20%  levels  of dissimilar  Inactive  Ingredients.   Snails were exposed  to
aqueous  suspensions  of  the  products  In groups  of  four  In  800 ml  of  water
at  230  ppm  hardness  and  2Q°C.  The 48-, 72-  and  96-hour  LC^s   based  on
active  Ingredient  for product  A  were 35.7,  19.1  and 12 ppm,  respectively,
and 38,  19.1 and  8.9 ppm,  respectively,  for  product  B.  The  products  were
2- to  4-fold more  toxic when  suspensions were  prepared  In acetone.   The
96-hour LC50s for products A and B were 2.8 and 3.2 ppm,  respectively.
    Bluzat  et  al. (1982a)  assessed the effects  of  short-term exposures  (1
hour)  of  scud,  Gammarus pulex. to  a  commercial  product  (probably  product  A
as  described above)  containing  80%  thlram.   Thirty  scud were  exposed  to
nominal  concentrations  of  thlram ranging  from 1-50  ppm In  1  I, of  water  for
1  hour.   Animals were  rinsed  and  transferred  to aerated  freshwater  (hard-
ness=230 ppm, pH=7.5)  for 10 days.  All  scud  exposed to 50  ppm died within  5
days  of  treatment.   Scud exposed to  10,  5, 2 and  1 ppm thlram  experienced
95, 79,  48 and  25%  mortality  by the end  of  the 10-day  observation period.
The mortality level  among  control scud at  the end of the 10-day  observation
period  was 7.5%.  Bluzat  et  al.  (1982a)  also  assessed the dissipation  of
acute  toxlclty of  aged thlram solutions to G. pjl_ex.   Groups of  scud  (n=130
and 190} were exposed for  96 hours to 0.7  ppm aqueous  suspensions  of  thlram
1, 48  and  96 hours after preparation of  the  test  solutions.  Scud  had  84.6,
91.5  and  50% mortality  levels  for  96-hour exposures to  1-,  48-  and 96-hour
aged solutions of 0.7 ppm thlram, respectively.

0133d                               -12-                             02/22/89

-------
    Bluzat et al.  (1982b)  assessed  the acute toxldty of  the  two commercial
th1ram-conta1n1ng products (product A  and  product B described above)  to  the
freshwater scud,  Garomarus pulex.   Each product  contained an  80% level  of
thlram but 20% levels of  dissimilar Inactive  Ingredients.   Scud  were  exposed
to aqueous suspensions  of the products  In groups of  10  In 800  ml of  water
at 230  ppm hardness  and 20°C.  The  24-,  48-,  72-  and  96-hour  LCggS  based
on active Ingredient  for product  A   were 14.0,  1.21,  0.41  and 0.20  ppm,
respectively, and 4.77, 0.48,  0.2 and  0.13 ppm,  respectively,  for product B.
The  toxldty  of  each  product  was  only  minimally Influenced by  the  solvent
used  to  prepare  suspensions  (water   or  acetone).   The  96-hour  LC5Qs  for
products A and 8 In acetone were  0.22  and 0.06 ppm, respectively.
    Bluzat and  Seuge (1983) assessed  the effects of  exposure  to thlram on
Gamroarus  pulex  by  different  routes of  exposure  (water  and diet).   Twenty
scud were exposed  to aqueous  solutions of thlram  at  concentrations of  0.02,
0.025, 0.035, 0.05  and  0.08  ppm.  Test solutions  were renewed  twice  weekly.
The  approximate  median  lethal  times   for  groups  of  scuds  exposed to  these
solutions were  30,  8.5,  6.5,  4.5  and 5  days,   respectively.   Alternately,
scud  were offered  either dried  bean  seeds  soaked  1n,  or  pieces  of  moss
rehydrated In, aqueous  suspensions  of  thlram ranging from  50-10,000  ppm  for
48 hours  at   8°C.   Observations  were  reported  1n terms  of the  duration  of
treatment over  which 90  and  10%  of   the  treated animals  were   expected  to
survive.  Scud  offered bean seeds  treated with  3000  and 10,000  ppm thlram
demonstrated   90% survival  after 3-3.5  days and  10% survival  after  29-36
days.  Control animals  survived  7.4-10 and 143-145 days,  respectively.   Scud
offered mosses  treated with 50-10,000 ppm thlram demonstrated  90% survival
after  2.4-5.4 days and  10%  survival  after  9-27  days.   Control   animals
survived 5.9-10 and 101-121 days, respectively.


0133d                               -13-                            03/21/89

-------
    Seuge et al. (1983) assessed  the  acute  toxlclty of an aqueous suspension
of thlram  1n a  flatworm,  Duqesla gonocephala. an  Isopod,  Asellus aguatlcus.
and an amphibian,  Xenopus  laevls. at two stages  of development (47 and 53).
Organisms  were  exposed  to nominal  concentrations  of  thlram  In 800  ml  of
water  at  230 ppm  hardness and  20°C.   The  24-,  48-,  72- and  96-hour  LC5Qs
for D. gonocephala  were  0.53,  0.26, 0.088  and 0.048 ppm,  respectively.  The
24-, 48-,  72- and  96-hour  LC5Qs  for  A.  aauatlcus were 1,882,  688,  161,  and
61  ppm,  respectively.  The  24-, 48-,  72- and 96-hour  LC5Qs for  X.  laevls
were  0.017, 0.014,  0.013  and  0.013  ppm,  respectively,  for  stage 47  and
0.025, 0.022, 0.021  and 0.021  ppm,  respectively, for stage  53.   The Inves-
tigators noted  that  the  slopes of the response curves were  much  steeper  for
X. laevls than for either of the other organisms  tested.
    Seuge  and  Bluzat (1983) assessed  the  acute  toxlclty of fresh  and aged
aqueous  suspensions  of  thlram  to  larvae  of  the  mayfly, Cloeon  dlpterum.
Organisms  were  exposed  to nominal  concentrations  of  thlram  1n 800  mi  of
water  at  230 ppm hardness  and 20°C.  Tests  with  larvae  were begun  within  2
hours  of  collection  from  the  field.   The  24-,  48-,  72- and  96-hour  LC^.s
for larvae  exposed  to freshly  prepared  solutions of  thlram  were 1.92, 1.3,
1.08 and  1.01  mg/i, respectively.  Tests  with larvae that had been held  1n
the  laboratory  for  4   days   before  testing  demonstrated  a  significantly
greater  sensitivity  (-2-fold)   to thlram than larvae  used  Immediately upon
collection.   The  toxlclty of  aged  solutions of   thlram  to  larvae  of  C.
dlpterum was assessed by exposing larvae  to solutions  that had  been prepared
1,  7  and 36  hours  before Initiation of  exposure.   The levels of  mortality
after  24  hours  were  50.4,  16.7  and  3.3X,  respectively.   The levels  of
mortality after 48 hours were  67.3,  26.6  and 8.654,  respectively.   The levels
of  mortality  after  72  hours  were  73.6,  46.7  and  22X,  respectively.
0133d                               -14-                             03/21/89

-------
The  levels  of  mortality  after   96   hours   were  79.5,  64.7  and  45.3X,
respectively.
    Kn1e  et  al.  (1983)  reported  an  EC5Q of  0.06  wg/l for  Daphnla  maqna
exposed  to  thlram.   The  respective  EC.  and  EC10Q  concentrations  were
0.05 and 0.8 yg/i.
    Jouany et  al.  (1985)  assessed the toxlclty  of  thIrani to the water flea,
Daphnla  maqna.  carp,  Cvprlnus  carplo.  and  zebraflsh,   Brachyodanlo  rerlo.
Daphnlds  were  exposed  to  0,  0.1 and  1  mg/l  thlram  1n  crystallizing  dishes
containing  500 mi  of  test  solution  for  24  hours.   None  of  the  daphnlds
exposed  to  1   mg/l  survived,  and  mortality  among   those  exposed  to  0.1
mg/l  was  50%.   The  toxlclty  of   thlram to   carp,  Cyprlnus  carplo.  and
zebraflsh,  Brachyodanlo rerlo.  was assessed  under  static  conditions  In  a
synthetic  dilution  water.   There  was  no mortality  among  fish  of  either
species  exposed  to  0.1 mg/l  after  24 hours.   Zebraflsh had  100% mortality
at  1.0~mg/i,  while  carp  had  no  mortality   at 1.0  mg/l  after  24  hours.
Jouany  et  al.   (1985)  also assessed the toxlclty  of  thlram to  zebraflsh by
passage  of  thlram  through  a   simple  food  chain.   Exponentially  growing
cultures  of  algae  were Incubated with 0.1 mg/l thlram  for  48 hours.   Cells
were centHfuged,  washed  and offered  to daphnlds  that  were  then  offered to
zebraflsh.   Fish  were  each fed  20 daphn1ds/day.  Mortality  among zebraflsh
rose OX at  4  days  to 100% at  8  days  after  Initiation of  the experiment.
Mortality among control fish was ~40% after 8  days.
    Van  Leeuwen et  al.  (1985a)  assessed the  acute  toxlclty of thlram to
gupples.  PoeclHa  retlculata.  and water fleas,  D.  roagna. 1n  static  renewal
assays  using  standard protocols.   The 96- and 48-hour  LC5Qs for  gupples
and daphnlds exposed to thlram were 0.27 and 0.21 mg/l, respectively.
0133d                               -15-                             02/22/89

-------
    Van Leeuwen  et  al. (1986a)  assessed  the acute  toxUHy  of  thlram (>98%
purity) to  rainbow  trout, Salmo  qalrdnerl.   F1sh {average weight  of  34.0 g
and average  length  of 15.3  cm),  were acclimatized  to  laboratory conditions
for 5-7 days 1n a  400 t,  tank at  15°C.   Diluent  water used  1n  the toxlclty
tests was  reconstituted  with a  pH of 7.8 and  a  hardness of  50  mg/i.  Fish
were  fasted for  24  hours  before  being  exposed  to thlram  In  10 8,  tanks.
The  24-hour LC5Q  (and 95%  confidence limits)  was  0.26 mg/l  (0.24-0.32).
For  flsti  weighing ~47 g,  the 24-hour LC5Q  (and  95% confidence  limits)  was
0.30 mg/l (0.18-0.50).
    Van Leeuwen  et  al. (1986a)  also assessed the  sublethal  effects  of acute
exposure of  rainbow  trout,  S. galrdnerl.  to  thlram  (>98% purity).   Ten fish
were  exposed  to 0.18  mg/l  of   thlram  for   24  hours  under  the  conditions
described above  for  the  lethality assays.    Fish  were  anaesthetized  at  the
end  of  the  24-hour  exposure  period.  Tissue  samples  were  analyzed   for  a
variety of  parameters.   Exposure of trout to thlram  resulted  1n  significant
declines In  blood glucose  levels  and  IWer protein bound  SH content.   Inves-
tigators  also  noted  significant  Increases  In liver  LDH activity,  percent
llpld  content   of   liver,  nonproteln  bound   SH   content   In  liver,  G-6-PDH
activity  1n blood,  and blood  osmolarlty.  The Investigators  concluded that
thlram should be regarded as a cytotoxlc  chemical.
4.1.2.   Chronic Effects on Fauna.
    4.1.2.1.   TOXICITY — Van Leeuwen et al.  (1985b)  assessed  the chronic
effects of  thlram (98% purity)  on survival, reproduction and growth  of  the
water  flea, Daphnla  magna.   In  a  21-day study.   Daphnlds  were exposed  to
thlram  1n  500  ml  of  solution  1n  800  ml  vessels.  Test  solutions  were
renewed 3  times  a  week  from freshly prepared stock solutions  of  thlram.
0133d                               -16-                             03/21/89

-------
Test concentrations  were  not verified  by  analysis.   The  test  was conducted
at  20°C  In a  temperature controlled  room with a  photoperlod of  12 hours.
Diluent  water   had   a  hardness  of  225 mg/i  and  a  pH  of  8.1.   Daphnlds
starting at  <24 hours old  were fed  dally with  3xlOB  cells/I of  the green
algae,  Chlorella  pyrenoldosa.   Investigators  reported  a  21-day  LC5Q  of  8
        The  lowest   tested  concentration  that  resulted  In  a  decrease  In
fecundity  was  10 yg/l.   The  lowest  tested  concentration  that resulted  1n
a  decrease  In  size of  daphnlds  after  21  days  was  1.8  tig/I.  There  were
no  significant  effects  on  daphnlds  exposed to  1  yg/l of  thlram over  the
21 -day study.
    Van  Leeuwen  et  al.  (19865)  assessed  the  chronic  toxlclty of  thlram  to
embryolarval stages  of  rainbow trout, Sal mo galrdnerl.  Eggs within  3 hours
of  fertilization  were  exposed  to  10-1  volumes  of  a  series  of  thlram
concentrations In all-glass aquaria.  The test  temperature was  10°C.  Diluent
water was  reconstituted with a  hardness  of 50 mg/i. and a pH  of  7.7.   Test
solutions were renewed 3  times weekly and were  aerated continuously.   Thlram
stock solutions  were prepared freshly at  each  renewal.  Test  concentrations
were not measured, and  eggs were kept In  the dark until embryogenesls, after
which a  photoperlod  of  12:12 hours was Imposed.  Larvae were not  fed during
the  study.   The  60-day  LC™  (and 95% confidence  limits)  for  embryolarval
stages  of   rainbow  trout  exposed  to thlram was  1.1   yg/l  (1.1-1.2).   The
60-day EC5Q  (and 95X confidence  Tlmlts)  based  on mortality and  teratogene-
sls  was  0.64  yg/l  (0.57-0,73).   The  most  pronounced teratogenlc  lesions
observed  Included  severe  spinal  and  vertebral  abnormalities,  scollosls,
lordosls, kyphosls and  dwarfed structures of the trunk.  The lowest  concen-
trations at which there were  no  observable effects  based on  mortality, total
embryotoxlclty,   length  and  weight were  1.0,  <0.32,  <0.32 and  0.56  ug/l,
respectively.

0133d                               -17-                             02/22/89

-------
    Van Leeuwen et  al.  (1986c)  assessed the effects of  exposure  of  juvenile
rainbow trout  to  tMram.  Trout ~5  cm In length were  exposed to thlram  In
reconstituted  water  with  a  hardness  of 50  mg/l  and  a  pH of  7.7 for  21
days.  Exposure of  trout to  thlram resulted 1n a concentration-related  loss
of  glycogen  1n   the  liver  at  >25  yg/l  and  was  associated  with  reduced
body  weight  gain.   At  100  pg/l,  thlram Induced  a proliferation  of  bile
duct epithelial cells both with  and without formation of  new ductules.   Cell
necrosis  was  observed  occasionally,  and  hemorrhages  were  apparent 1n the
                                                    *.
brain  and  spinal  cord  at  5  yg/l.  The  Investigators   concluded  that the
teratogenlc action  of  the dithlocarbamates 1s  confined  to the notochord  at
concentrations likely to be encountered In the  environment.
    4.1.2.2.   BIOACCUMULATION/BIOCONCEMIRATION -- No measured steady-state
BCF  value  for thlram was  found  In the literature.   Based on  the  regression
equation,  log BCF = 2.791 - 0.564 log S  (Lyman  et al.,  1982)  and a  water
solubility  of 30  mg/l  (see  Section  1.2.), a  BCF  of 90.8 1s estimated for
this  compound.   This  value  suggests  that  thlram will  not bloaccumulate
significantly In aquatic organisms.
4.1.3.   Effects on Flora.
    4.1.3.1.   TOXICITY -- D1ehn and  Tollln  (1967)  assessed  the  effects  of
thlram  on  motnity and topophototaxls  of  Euqlena  gracHls.   Phototactlc
responses  were determined  In  a  phototaxlgraph  using   white  light  of 140
erg/cm2  second.    MotllHy  of  E..  gradlls  was  determined  by   microscopic
observation at  low levels of Illumination.   The  Investigators reported  that
motmty  and  topophototaxls  were  Inhibited  to  50%  of  control organisms
within  30  minutes  of  exposure  to  10~« M solutions  of  tetramethylthluram
dlsulflde.
0133d
-18-
02/22/89

-------
    KMshnakumarl   (1977)   assessed   the   toxlclty  of   tetramethylthluram
dlsulflde  to  the green alga,  Scenedesmus  acutus.  Cultures  were  maintained
at a  temperature  of 28+1 °C,  a light Intensity  of  8500  lux and a  pH  of  7-8.
Growth  of cultures  was  measured  dally  by  optical  density.   Assays  were
continued for 5 days.  Cultures exposed  to  10 and 100 ppm tetramethylthluram
dlsulflde were  dead after 1  and  3 days, respectively.   Cultures  exposed  to
0.5,  1,  5 and  10 ppm demonstrated  90.9,  90.9,  75  and  59%  growth  compared
with  controls  after  1  day.   Cultures  exposed  to  0.5,  1  and  5  ppm demon-
strated  83.1,  80.3  and  56.3% growth  compared with  controls after  3  days.
Cultures  exposed  to  0.5, 1  and  5 ppm demonstrated  82.0,  77.7  and  42.8%
growth compared with  controls.  The  NOEL for  tetramethylthluram dlsulflde  1n
S. acutus appears to be <0.5 ppm.
    Gangawane and Kulkarnl (1979)  assessed  the  effect of  thlram on growth  of
the  blue-green  algae,  Ngstoc sp.  and  Tolypothrlx  sp.   Cultures of  these
algal  species  were exposed  to thlram In  test  tubes In  10 mi of medium  at
1500  lux  and  25°C  for  8  hours.   Growth  of  algae  was  determined  by  the
optical  density  of acetone-soluble  pigments.   The Investigators  reported  a
25.4%  reduction  In  growth  for cultures  of  Nostoc  sp.  exposed  to  500  ppm
thlram  and a  14.1%  reduction In growth   for  cultures  of Tolypothrlx  sp.
exposed to 100 ppm thlram.
    Hutber et  al.  (1979)  assessed the  effect  of thlram on  growth  of  four
species  of  blue-green algae,  Aphanocapsa  (strains  6308  and  6714),  Anabaena
vaMabllls and Nostoc.  Cultures  were maintained  at 30°C  at 9000 lux Illumi-
nation  Intensity.   Thlram was added to  the cultures  during  the  exponential
growth  phase.   Exposure  of  cultures  to  various  concentrations  of  thlram
continued  for  48  hours.   The concentrations  that  reduced  the  exponential
0133d
-19-
02/22/89

-------
growth  rate  of  these  algae by  50% were  50,  100, 50  and 100  ppm,  respec-
tively; the  concentrations  that  Inhibited growth  completely were  100,  >100,
100 and >100 ppm, respectively.
    Dive et al.  (1980) assessed  the  toxldty  of  thlram to the  dilate proto-
zoan,  Colpldlum  campy1urn.   Protozoan cultures were cultivated monoxenlcally
on  Escherlchla  coll.   Solutions  (0.25  mi)  of   thlram  with   acetone  as  a
carrier were  added  to  50 ml  of  culture medium.    Protozoa were counted with
a Coulter  counter after  43  hours of Incubation at 20°C.   The  minimal active
dose of  thlram required to produce  reductions  1n the  number  of generations
of C. campy1urn was 0.3  mg/i.
    Vasseur  et  al.  (1982)  assessed the  toxlclty of  thlram  to  the  alga,
Chlorella  vulgar Is.  by  monitoring the  effect on  ATP  levels.   Cultures were
swirled at a  rate  of  150  oscillations/minute and maintained  at  20°C  under
1500  lux   Intensity  light.  The  24-hour  IC__  for C.   vulqarls based on  ATP
levels^ias >2 ppm thlram.
    Kn1e   et   al.   (1983)   reported  an  EC,Q  of  >6   mg/i   for  the  alga,
Haematococcus pluvlalls. exposed  to tetramethylthluram dlsulfIde.
    D1ve et  al.  (1984)  assessed  the effects  of   thlram on growth  of  various
strains of the dilates, Tetrahymena thermophlla  and  Tetrahymena pyrlformls.
and various  species  of  amoebae,   dilates were exposed to thlram  In  sterile
cotton  plugged  glass  tubes  containing  10  ml  of   medium.  Tests   were
performed  1n an automatic  blophotometer.  Optical density  of  cultures  was
monitored  every  30 minutes  for 3 days.   Experiments were  conducted at 28, 37
and 39°C.   The effects  of  thlram on amoebae  growth was achieved by exposing
amoebae to th1ram-contaminated agar  plates spread with  bacteria or yeast.  A
drop  of amoebae cyst  suspension was  placed 1n  the  center  of the  plate.
0133d                               -20-                             02/22/89

-------
Growth of amoebae was  monitored by observation of  the  extension of lysis of
the prey.  Growth rates  of dilate strains were  Inhibited  completely at 1.0
mg/l  thlram  for  all   but  one  strain   cultured   at   28°C.   At  0.5  mg/l,
growth  rates  were  relatively  unaffected,  except  for  a  single  strain.
Effects of thlram on growth  of  amoebae were highly variable and species- and
strain-dependent.   Growth  Inhibition ranged  from 0.5-16  mg/l.   Complete
Inhibition  of  growth  commenced  at  8  mg/l  for   one  species  but  was  >32
mg/t for several strains of another species.
    Grollere  and  Dupy-Blanc  (1985) reported  that  thlram Induced a lengthen-
ing of  the  generation time  In heat  shock  synchronized axenlc  cultures  of
Tetrahymena  pyrlformls.    The  effect was  observed  for  concentrations  of
thlram ranging  from 0.25-1.0 mg/l applied  at the end of the  6th heat shock
treatment and at various  Intervals  (<90 minutes)  after completion  of  heat
shock treatments.
    Jouany et al.  (1985)  assessed the toxlclty of  thlram to the green alga,
Chlorella vulgar 1s.   Algal cultures  were Incubated at  20°C under  1500 lux
and a 16:8 photoperlod on  a  gyratory  shaker at 150 rpm.  Thlram was added to
exponentially   growing   cultures   with   cell   concentrations   of   15x10*
cells/ml.   The   72-hour  ICrQ  for growth of  algal cultures  as  determined
by optical density at 665 nm was -5.5 mg/l.
    Van  Leeuwen et  al.  (1985a)  assessed the  toxlclty  of  thlram  to algae,
Chlorella  pyrenoldosa.   Algal  bloassays  were  conducted  at   20°C  with  an
Initial  cell density  of  ~108  cells/l   In   200  ml Erlenmeyer   flasks  held
on  a  mechanical  shaker.   Cells  were counted with a  Coulter  counter.  The
96-hour  EC5Qs  for   two  measures  of  algal  density,   the  average  specific
growth  rate  and  effects  on  the  time-lag  until  maximum population  growth,
were  1.0 and  0.03  mg/l, respectively.   Van  Leeuwen  et  al.   (1985a)  also


0133d                               -21-                              02/22/89

-------
assessed  the effects  of  thlram on  photosynthesis  and  respiration  1n  C.
pyrenoldosa.  Effects of thlram  on  photosynthesis was  assessed  by Incubating
algae with  NaH14C03  1n  the presence  of thlram  for  4  hours and  determin-
ing  the  bicarbonate uptake  by  liquid scintillation.   Effects  of  thlram  on
respiration  were  assessed  by Incubating  14C-labeled  algae  1n  the dark  for
16  hours before  determining the  radioactivity remaining 1n  the  cells  by
liquid  scintillation.   The  ECgo for assimilation  of radioactive  bicarbon-
ate  by   algae  was  4.0  mg/i.   The  EC5_ for  respiration  of  14C  by  algae
was >10.0 mg/l.
    Taylor  and  Pace  (1987)  assessed  the  effect  of  thlram  on  growth  of
cultures  of  a  chrysomonad and a dilate,  Cvclldlure sp.   Log-phase cultures
of  the  chrysomonad and  dilate  were  exposed  to thlram for 24 and  48  hours,
respectively. In darkness at 22°C.   Culture flasks  were  neither  agitated  nor
aerated.   Growth  of  the   chrysomonad  was   Inhibited completely  following
exposure  to  210 pH  thlram.  Growth of  the dilate  was  Inhibited completely
at  -80  and  -1800  yM, but. was   Inhibited 60% of control  levels at -560  yM
thlram.   Taylor and  Pace   (1987)  also  reported  that  4  »ft  thlram did  not
Inhibit  growth  of a  chlorophyte,   Dunallella  tertolectlca. after 7  days.
Growth of five  other  phytoplankton  species were  Inhibited  from  -0.2-18.6% of
controls by  exposure to 4 pM thlram for 7 days.
    4.1.3.2.   BIOCONCENTRATION — Pertinent   data   regarding   the   blocon-
centratlon  potential of  thlram  1n aquatic  flora  were not  located  1n  the
available literature cited In Appendix A.
4.1.4.   Effects  on  Bacteria.   Van  Leeuwen   et  al.  (198Sa)  assessed  the
toxlclty  of  thlram to luminescent  bacteria,  Photobacterlum  phosphoreum.  and
nitrifying  bacteria, Nltrosomonas  and  NUrobacter.   The  EC™  value  for  P.
phosphoreum  exposed  to thlram,   defined as  the concentration of  thlram that

0133d                               -22-                             03/21/89

-------
produced a 50% reduction  1n  bacterial  luminescence  after 15 minutes, was 0.1
mg/i.  The  effects  of exposure  to  thlram on the nitrification  process  of a
mixed  culture of  Nltrosomonas  and  NUrobacter were monitored  by  using  a
pH-1nd1cator  mixture  that assessed the  conversion  of ammonia by  nitrite to
nitrate. The  lowest effective  concentration  or  minimum Inhibiting concentra-
tion of thlram on the nitrification process after 3 hours was 18 mg/i.
4.2.   TERRESTRIAL TOXICOLOGY
4.2.1.   Effects on Fauna.   Tucker  and Crabtree (1970)  reported  the results
of  studies assessing  the  acute oral toxlclty of thlram  to 3- to 4-month-old
pen-reared  mallard ducks.  Anas  platvrhvnchos. and  ring-necked  pheasants,
Phaslanus  colchlcus.   Birds were  dosed  by  Inserting gelatin capsules  con-
taining thlram through glass tubing to the level of the  crop, proventrlculus
or  stomach.   Birds were  fasted for 16-20  hours  before dosing.   Two to seven
animals were  employed at  each of four  dosage  levels.  Birds were observed
for  14 days  post treatment.   The authors  reported oral  LD5Qs  of  >2800  and
673  (95%  confidence   limits   of  485-932)  mg/kg for ducks  and  pheasants,
respectively.
    Egberts et  al.  (1972)  examined  the  oral chronic toxlclty of  thlram to
Japanese quail,  Coturnlx  coturnlx.   Four groups of quail  consisting  of  five
hens  and   two cocks  each  were  exposed  to  thlram  1n   their  diet  (turkey
starter)  at  concentrations  of  2,  10  and  50  ppm  (mg/kg) for   11  weeks.
Females were  housed  separately  but mated with one  of  the  males each  2.5
days.  There  were no  statistically significant  effects 1n  birds  offered  feed
contaminated  with 10  ppm  thlram.  Birds fed 50  ppm contaminated  feed demon-
strated significant reductions 1n numbers  of eggs laid and hatched and shell
thickness of  eggs.  Investigators also demonstrated that there were signifi-
cant reductions  1n the numbers of  lymphocytes,  granulocytes  and  monocytes of
blood from birds dosed with 50 ppm ttilram-contaminated feed.

0133d                               -23-                             03/21/89

-------
    Heath  et  al.  (1972)  assessed  the  oral  acute  toxlclty of  thlram  to
Japanese quail,  C. coturnlx  japonlca. pheasant,  P.  colchlcus.  and  mallard
ducks, A.  platyrhvnchos.   All test  birds  were Incubator-hatched  progeny  of
breeding colonies.  Thlram was dissolved  In a carrier and  added to  the diet
by mixing with commercial mash In  a  ratio  of  2 parts  of  solution  to  98 parts
of feed  by weight.  Birds were  offered  thlram-contaminated mash  for  5 days
and monitored  for  3 days after termination  of  treatments.   The Investigators
reported  a  lack  of  mortality  among  quail and  pheasants  fed  the  highest
concentration  tested   (5000  ppm  1n  feed).   Mallard  ducks experienced  20%
mortality among birds  fed mash containing 5000 ppm thlram.
    Lorgue et  al.  (1975)  also examined the oral acute toxldty of thlram  to
quail.   These Investigators  reported  that  thlram-contaminated  feed  (20 g
Thlrban/10  kg)  caused Immediate  (24  hours)  blockage  of egg  laying  and
regression of  secondary  sexual  characteristics In males. These effects were
reversible on  withdrawal  of  contaminated  feed from  diet.  Lorgue and  Soyez
(1976) assessed  the  oral  toxlclty of  thlram  to gray partridges.  Thlram  at
1.6 g/kg completely Inhibited egg laying within 48 hours.   The  Incidence  of
embryonic mortality was Increased significantly at 4-fold lower doses.
    Gruen  et al.  (1982)  assessed  the acute  toxlclty of thlram to  Japanese
quail  C.,  coturnlx Japonlca.  The  Investigators reported an ID™  and  an
LC50  of  695  and >10,000 mg/kg,  respectively.  Hadhazy  and  GlavHs  (1982)
reported  that  100 and  200 g  thl ram/100 kg feed  caused Imperfect egg  shell
calcification  and  production  of  eggs  with  abnormal   size and  form  1n
pheasants.   Apparently,  disturbances were  due to oviduct  Inflammation,  but
were reversible 2-3 weeks after cessation of dosing.
    Schafer  and  Bowles  (1985) reported the results of studies assessing the
ALD of thlram to  wild-trapped  deer  mice,  Peromyscus manlculatus.  The  ALD


(1133d                               -24-                             02/22/89

-------
was obtained with  a  single level at each  treatment  that  was  50% higher than
the preceding  treatment.   Thlram was administered by gavage  with  a carrier.
Mice were monitored for mortality for  3  days.   Investigators  reported an ALD
of  1600  mg/kg; deer  mice Ingested  an average of  +200 mg th1 ram/kg bw/day
over the 3-day test period.
    Roark and  Dale  (1979)  assessed the  toxldty of  thlrara  to  earthworms,
E1sen1a  foetlda.   Worms   were  exposed  to  thlram  by  Immersion  In  a  2.0%
solution  for  1  minute,  as  a  component  of their  diet   (bermudagrass  feed
treated  with a 0.1% aqueous solution),  and mixed  with  the  worms'  culture
soil  (0.426  g  thlram  In  4719  cm3  of  soil).    Worms  exposed to  thlram  by
Immersion experienced  mortality  levels  ranging  from  5%, 7  days  posttreat-
ment,  to 38%,  101 days  posttreatment.    Worms  fed  th1ram-treated  bermuda-
grass clippings experienced  mortality  levels ranging from 10% after  34 days
of  treatment to 42% after  101 days.  Mortality  among worms reared In thlram-
treated~so1l ranged  from  21% after   10 days  to 98.1% after  29 days and 99.9%
after 52 days.
4.2.2.   Effects on  Flora.  Ingham  (1985) reviewed  the  effects  of  thlram-
contalnlng products  on soil  bacteria  and  fungi  In a  wide variety  of  test
systems.  The  author  listed Inhibitory  and  stimulatory effects,  as  well  as
the presence of tolerant populations of soil mlcroflora.
4.3.   FIELD STUDIES
    Pertinent data regarding the  effects of  thlram  on flora and fauna In the
field were not located 1n the available literature cited 1n Appendix A.
4.4.   AQUATIC RISK ASSESSMENT
    Aquatic  toxldty  data  for  tetramethylthluram  dlsulflde  (thlram)  were
sufficient  to  calculate  a  Final  Acute Value,   Final  Chronic Value,  final
Acute-Chronic  Ratio  and  Final  Plant  Value.    The  lack  of  appropriately

0133d                                -25-                             03/31/89

-------
conducted b1oconcentrat1on/b1oaccumulat1on  studies prevented  the estimation
of a Final Residue Value.
    The Final  Acute  Value was  calculated  from GMAVs  for  flatworms,  Dugesla
gonocephala  (0.038  mg/i),  blueglll  sunflsh,  lepomls  macrochlrys  (0.045
mg/i),  scud,   Gamma r us   pulex  (0.104  mg/l),  and   rainbow  trout,  Salmo
qalrdnerl  (0.13 mg/l),  listed  In  Figure  4-1  using  the computer  program
appearing In Figure  4-2.  The Final Acute  Value obtained  In  this manner was
20.4 tig/1 (Figure 4-3).
    The Final  Chronic  Value was  calculated  from the ratio  of  the Final Acute
Value and the  final  Acute-Chronic Ratio.  The  Final  Acute-Chronic  Ratio was
calculated  from the geometric  mean of  the ratio  of results  from  acute and
chronic  studies listed  In Figure  4-1  with  rainbow  trout,  Salmo  galrdnerl
(0.13/0.00032=406.25),  and the water  flea,   Daphnla magna  (0.21/0.000134=
1567.16).  The  Final Acute-Chronic  Ratio obtained  from the geometric  mean of
406.25~and  1567.16  was  797.91  (see Figure  4-3).   The Final  Chronic  Value
obtained from  the ratio  of the Final Acute  Value and the Final Acute-Chronic
Ratio (20.4/797.91) was 0.0256 vg/l  (see Figure 4-3).
    The  Final  Plant Value  was  obtained  from  the lowest EC™  obtained from
an acceptable  study with freshwater  algae.   The Final  Plant  Value obtained
In  this  manner  was 0.03 mg/l  for  a  study  with Chlorella  pyrenoldosa (see
Figures 4-1 and 4-3).
    The Criterion Maximum Concentration  as  described  1n U.S. EPA/OWRS  (1986)
Is  equal  to 1/2  the Final  Acute  Value  (20.4/2).  The Criterion Continuous
Concentration as described  In U.S.  EPA/OWRS  (1986)  1s  equal  to the lowest of
the Final Chronic Value, the Final Plant Value and the Final  Residue Value.
0133d
-26-
03/31/89

-------
Family
*1
Chordat* 
f2
Chorda!* (warmvat*r fi*h>
•3
Chordat* (fi«h or amphibian)
#4
Cru«tac*an ' (planktonic)
*S
Cru*tac*an ( b*nthic >
*6
Xn**ctan
#7
non- Arthropod/ -Chorda!*
*a
H*v Zna*ctan or phylum
r*pr*a*ntativ*
f9
alga*
• 10
Vascular plant
TEST TYPE
GHAV
0.13*
0. 045*
0.27*
0.21*
0. 104'
0. 81*
0. 038"
0.67'
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
GttCV*
<0. 00032 J
NA
NA
0.000134"
MA
NA
NA
NA
0. 03>
NA
BCF«
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
   *NA*not availabl* * 96-hr LC»«  in ppm for rainbow trout Salmo Qairdn*ri
   •96-hr LC«* in pp* for blu»gill  «unfi*h L*oomia- macrochirua- "96-hr  LC«0
   in mg/L for guppi** Po*cilia  r*tieulata •48-hr LC*« in mg/L for th*
   wat*r fl*a Daphnia maana '96-hr  LC««  in mg/L for >cud Gammarus oul*x .
   •96-hr LC(* for th* mayfly Clo*on diotarum "96-hr LC>o for th* flatworm
   Duo*eia oonoophala > 48-hr LCi*  in mg/L for th* worm Tubif*x tubif*x
   ^ 60-day NOEC in mg/L for rainbow trout  g..  oairdn*ri "21-day NOEC  in
   mg/L for th* wat*r fl*a £. maona >96-hr EC.* in mg/L for th* alga
   Chlor*lla pvr*noido«a
                                 FIGURE 4<1

               Organization Chart for Listing GMAVs. GHCVs and
           BCFs Required to Derive Numerical Water  Quality Criteria
         by the Method of  U.S. EPA/OURS (1986) for the Protection  of
               Freshwater  Aquatic Life from Exposure to Thlram
0133d
-27-
03/31/89

-------
       10  REH THIS PROGRAM CALCULATES THE FAV WHEN THERE  ARE  LESS THAN
       20  REM 59 HAVS IN THE DATA SET
       30  X«0
       40  X2-0
       50  Y»0
       60  Y2»0
       70  PRINT "HOW HANY HAVS ARE IN THE DATA SET?"
       80  INPUT N
       90  PRINT "WHAT ARE THE FOUR LOWEST HAVS?'
       100 FOR R*l TO 4
       110 INPUT V
       120 X«X*LOG(V)
       13O X2«X2*(LOG(V»*(LOG(V»
       140 P-R/(N*1)
       150 Y2«Y2*P
       160 Y«Y*SQR

170 NEXT R 180 S»SQR«X2-X»X/4>/(Y2-Y*Y/4)J 190 L»(X-S»Y)/4 200 A«S«SQR(O.OS)»L 2JLO F«EXP(A> 220 PRINT "FAV - »F 230 END FIGURE 4-2 Example Computer Program In BASIC Language for Calculating the Final Acute Value Source: U.S. EPA/OWRS, 1986 0133d -28- 03/31/89


-------

Freehwater*
Saltwater'
FAV«
20.4
ug/L
ID
FCV»
0. 0256
ug/L
ID
FACR«
797. 91
ID
FPV«
30 ug/L
ID
FRV*
ID
ID
   •Minimum data requiremente  for  generation  of  a Final Acute Value
         (FAV) include the  results  of  at  least one accepatable teat vith
         organisms in each  of eight taxonomic  families.

   •Minimum data requirement*  for  generation  of  a Final Chronic
         Value (FCV) Include the  result*  of at leaet one acceptable teet
         with organisms in  each of  three  taxonomic familie* with at least
         one fieh and one invertebrate.   A  freshwater criterion muat
         include at least one apeclee  that  ia  freahwater while the
         remaining may be marine.   A aaltwater criterion muat include at
         leaat one apeciea  that ia  marine while the remaining may be
         freahwater.

   •Minimum data requirement*  for  .generation  of  a Final Acute-Chronic
         Ratio (FACR) include aatiafying  the minimum data requirements for
      -  the FAV and FCV.

   'The  Final Plant Value  (FPV)'  la obtained by aelectlng the loweat plant
         value from a teat  with either an algae or vascular plant in which
         the concentrationa of  teat material were measured.

   •The  Final Residue Value (FRV)  ia  obtained by aelecting the lowest of
         the available residue  values.

   'ID»Insufficient data for calculation of a criterion.
                                FIGURE 4-3

      Summary Chart for  Data Required to Generate Criteria by the Method
  of U.S. EPA/OWRS (1986) for  Safe Levels of Thlram In Aquatic  Environments
0133d
-29-
                                                                 03/31/89

-------
    The procedures  described In  U.S.  EPA/OWRS (1986)  Indicate  that,  except
possibly  where  a  locally  Important  species  Is  very  sensitive,  freshwater
aquatic organisms and  their uses should not be affected  unacceptably  1f the
4-day  average  concentration  of  tetramethylthluram  dlsulflde  (thlram)  does
not  exceed  the  Criterion  Continuous  Concentration  of   <0.0256  yg/i  more
than once every 3 years  on  the  average,  and 1f the 1-hour average concentra-
tion  does  not  exceed   the  Criterion  Maximum Concentration  of  10.2  yg/J.
more than once every 3 years on the average.
    The lack of  pertinent  data  regarding  the  effects  of  exposure  of  marine
fauna  and  flora   to  tetramethylthluram  dlsulflde   (thlram)  prevented  the
development of a saltwater criterion.
4.5.   SUMMARY
    The 96-hour  TL  of  thlram  In  flngerllng channel  catfish was  reported
as  0.79  mg/l   (McKee  and   Wolf,  1963).   The  26-hour  LD5Q  of  thlram  to
Daphnla magna  was  1.3  ppm (Frear  and  Boyd,  1967).  The  48-hour LC5Q  of
thlram  to  Tublfex  tublfex  was  0.67  mg/4  (Voronkln  and Loshakov,  1973).
Tooby  et  al.   (1975)  reported  a  96-hour  LC5Q  of  0.007  rag/*  (based  on
concentration of  product)  for  harlequin Hsh, Rasbora heteromorpha.  exposed
to  a  thlram-contalnlng product with 80% active Ingredient under  flowthrough
conditions.  Tooby  et  al.   (1975)  estimated  a  3-month  LC5Q  of 0.001  mg/J,
from an extrapolation of the acute test results.
    Schneider  (1979)  reported  96-hour  LC5Qs  of  0.13  and  0.4  ppm  for
rainbow trout,  Salmo galrdnerl.  exposed to solutions of  thlram  (99 and 75%
active  Ingredient,   respectively).   Exposure  of   blueglll sunflsh,  Lepomls
macrochlrus.  to  thlram  (99  and  75% active  Ingredient) generated  96-hour
LC5 s  of  0.045  and 0.28  ppm,  respectively.   The  96-hour  LC5Qs  (based  on
active  Ingredients)  for  two products each   containing  an  80%  level  of  thlram
0133d                               -30-                             03/31/89

-------
but 20% levels of dissimilar  Inactive  Ingredients  to  the freshwater  mollusc.
Lvmnaea staqnalls. were  12 and 8.9  ppm for products A  and  B,  respectively.
In aqueous  solutions  (Bluzat et al.,  1981).   The 96-hour LC5Qs  for  acetone
suspensions of products A and B were 2.8 and 3.2 ppm,  respectively.
    Exposure of  scud,  Gammarus  pulex.  to 10, 5, 2 and 1  ppm of  a commercial
product containing 80% thlram resulted  1n 95, 79,  48  and 25% mortality after
10 days  {Bluzat  et al.,  1982a).   Groups  of scud (n=130 and  190} exposed  to
0.7 ppm  aqueous  suspensions of thlram 1,  48 and 96  hours after  preparation
of  the  test  solutions  experienced 84.6,  91.5  and  50% mortality  levels,
respectively,  after   96   hours  of  treatment.    The   96-hour  LC5_s  for  two
commercial  thlram-contalnlng  products   (80% active Ingredient)  to  G.  pulex
were  0.20  ppm and 0.13  ppm for products A and B, respectively, 1n  aqueous
solutions  (Bluzat  et al.,  1982b).   The 96-hour LC5Qs  for  products  A  and  B
1n acetone were  0.22 and  0.06  ppm,  respectively.   The approximate  median
lethal times  for G.  pulex  exposed  to  0.02, 0.025, 0.035, 0.05 and  0.08  ppm
solutions  of  thlram  were 30,  8.5,  6.5, 4.5 and 5  days,  respectively (Bluzat
and Seuge,  1983).  Scud  offered bean seeds treated with  3000 and 10,000  ppm
thlram demonstrated  90%  survival  after 3-3.5  days   and  10% survival  after
29-36  days.   Scud offered mosses  treated with  50-10,000 ppm thlram  deomon-
strated 90% survival  after 2.4-5.4 days and  10% survival  after 9-27  days.
    The  96-hour  LC5Qs  for  the  flatworm,  Duqesla  qonocephala.   the  Isopod,
As ell us  aquatlcus.  and   the  amphibian, Xenqpus  laey1s.  at two stages  of
development  (47  and   53)  were 0.048,  61, 0.013 and  0.021 ppm,  respectively
(Seuge  et   al.,   1983).   The  96-hour  LC5Q   for   mayfly   larvae,   Cloeon
dlpterum.  exposed  to  freshly  prepared  solutions  of  thlram was  1.01  mg/1.
Solutions  of  thlram  aged for 1,  7  and 36 hours  produced  mortality  levels
among mayfly larvae of 79.5,  64.7  and  45.3%,  respectively, after  96  hours  of
exposure (Seuge and Bluzat, 1983).
0133d
-31-
03/31/89

-------
    The  respective  EC,,,  EC5Q  and  EC100  for  Daphnla  maqna  exposed  to
tetramethylthluram  dlsulflde  were  0.05,  0.06  and  0.8  yg/l,  respectively
(Knle  et  al.,  1983).   Oouany et  al.  (1985)  reported  OX mortality  for the
water  flea,  Daphnla maqna.  carp,  Cyprlnus  carj>1o. and  zebraflsh,  Brachyo-
danlo  rerlo.  exposed to  <0.1, 1.0  and  0.1  mg/i after  24 hours.   Zebraflsh
fed  thl ram-contaminated  daphnlds  experienced  a  linear  Increase  In mortality
from  0-1 00% between 4  and  8  days after  the  Initiation  of  the experiment.
The  96- and 48-hour LC5_s   for gupples,  Poec111a  retlculata. and daphnlds,
Daphnla maqna.  exposed   to  thlram  were  0.27  and  0.21   mg/i,  respectively
(Van  Leeuwen  et al..  1985a).   The  24-hour  LC5Q of thlram  (>98X  purity) to
rainbow  trout,  Salmo   qalrdnerl.   weighing  34.0 g  was  0.26   mg/4.   The
24-hour LC50   for  trout  weighing  -47 g  was  0.30  mg/l  (Van Leeuwen  et al.,
1986a).  Exposure  of trout  to  thlram also resulted 1n significant changes In
several blood  parameters.
    The 21-day  LC,.rt  for  thlram   1n  the  water  flea,  Daphnla  maqna.  was  8
                   50                                    — -
iig/i.  (Van   Leeuwen et  al.,  1985b).   The lowest  tested  concentration that
resulted  In   a  decrease  1n  fecundity  was  10  yg/l.    The  lowest   tested
concentration  that  resulted  1n a decrease In  size of daphnlds  after 21 days
was  1.8 yg/4.  There were  no  significant  effects  on daphnlds  exposed to
       of thlram over the 21 -day study.
    The  60-day  LC5Q   for   embryolarval  stages  of  rainbow  trout,  Salmo
qalrdnerl.  exposed  to thlram  was  1.1  yg/l  (Van Leeuwen  et  al.,  1986b).
The  60-day  EC™  based  on  mortality  and  teratogenesls  was  0.64  iig/l.
The lowest concentrations at  which there were no observable effects based on
mortality,  total  embryotox1c1tyt  length and weight  were 1.0,  <0.32,  <0.32
and  0.56  yg/l,   respectively.    Exposure   of   juvenile  rainbow  trout  to
thlram  for  21  days  resulted  In a  concentration-related  loss  of glycogen In
the  liver  at  >25  yg/l and  was associated  with reduced  body  weight gain.

0133d                                -32-                             03/31/89

-------
At  100  yg/l,  thlram  Induced  a  proliferation  of  bile  duct  epithelial
cells both  with and without  formation of  new ductules.   Cell  necrosis  was
observed occasionally, and hemorrhages were apparent  In the  brain  and  spinal
cord  at  5  v9/l (Van  Leeuwen et  al., 1986c).   Thlram 1s  not  expected  to
bloaccumulate significantly  In aquatic organisms  based  on an estimated  BCF
value of 90.8.
    MotllHy and topophototaxls of Euqlena qracllls were Inhibited  to  50% of
control  organisms  within  30  minutes  of  exposure  to 10~* M  solutions  of
tetramethylthluram dlsulflde  (D1ehn and Tollln,  1967). Cultures  of  the green
alga,  Scenedesmus  acutus.  exposed  to  10 and   100  ppm  tetramethylthluram
dlsulflde were  dead  after  1  and  3 days,  respectively.  The NOEL appears  to
be <0.5  ppm.  Gangawane and  Kulkarnl  (1979)  reported a  25.4%  reduction  In
growth  for  cultures  of  Nostoc sp.  exposed to  500 ppm thlram  and a  14.1%
reduction  In growth  for  cultures of  Tolypothrlx sp.  exposed  to  100  ppm
thlram.   Hutber et  al.  (1979)   reported  that  growth of  four  species  of
blue-green  algae,  Aphanocapsa (strains 6308  and 6714), Anabaena  vaMabnis
and  Nostoc. was  reduced by  50%  on  exposure  to 50,  100,  50  and 100  ppm
thlram,  respectively.   The concentrations  of  thlram  that  Inhibited  growth
completely were 100,  >100,  100 and >100 ppm,  respectively.
    The minimal active  dose  of thlram required  to produce reductions  In  the
number of generations  of the  dilate protozoan, Colpldlum campyTurn, was  0.3
mg/i  (Dive  et  al.,  1980).   The  24-hour  IC5Q  for  Chlorella vulgarls  based
on ATP  levels was  >2 ppm thlram (Vasseur et al.,  1982).  Kn1e et al.  (1983)
reported  an  EC,Q  of   >6  mg/i   for   the  alga,   Haematococcus  pluvlalls.
exposed  to   tetramethylthluram dlsulflde.   Growth  rates  of  the   dilates,
Tetrahymena  thermophlla  and  Tetrahymena pyrlformls  strains, were  Inhibited
completely  at  1.0  mg/i thlram for all but  one strain at  28°C (Dive et  al.,

0133d                               -33-                             03/31/89

-------
1984).   Growth  Inhibition  of  amoebae exposed  to  thlram was  achieved  at
concentrations ranging  from 0.5-16 mg/l.   Thlram at  concentrations  ranging
from  0.25-1.0 mg/i  Induced a  lengthening of  the generation  time  In  heat
shock  synchronized  axenlc  cultures of Tetrahymena pyMformls  (Grollere  and
Dupy-Blanc, 1985}.
    The  72-hour   IC5Q  for  growth of  the  green  alga,  Chlorella  vulgar 1s.
exposed  to  thlram as determined  by optical density  at 665 nm was  -5.5  mg/l
(Jouany  et  a!.,  1985).  The  96-hour   EC5Qs for  the average  specific  growth
rate  and  effects  on  the  time-lag   until  maximum  population  growth  1n
Chlorella pyrenoldosa  were  1.0 and 0.03  mg/l,  respectively  (Van  Leeuwen et
a!.,  1985a).  The  EC5Q for  assimilation   of  radioactive  bicarbonate by  C.
pyrenoldosa  was  4.0   mg/l.    The  EC5Q   for   respiration   of   14C   by  C.
pyrenoldosa was >10.0 mg/l.
    Growth  of  a  chrysomonad was  Inhibited completely following  exposure to
210  yM  thlram.    Growth  of  the  dilate,  Cyclldlum  sp.,   was  Inhibited
completely  at  -180  jiM thlram  (Taylor  and Pace,  1987).  Growth  of  a  chloro-
phyte, Dunallella  te.rto1ec.t1ca,  was  Inhibited at  4  jiH thlram after  7  days.
Growth of five other phytoplankton species was  Inhibited  from  -0.2-18.6% of
controls  by  exposure  to   4  yH  thlram  for   7  days.   The  15-mlnute  EC5Q
value  for  Photobacterlum phosphoreuro  exposed to  thlram  was  0.1 mg/i  (Van
Leeuwen  et  al.,  1985a).   The  lowest effective  concentration  or  minimum
Inhibiting  concentration of thlram on  the  nitrification  process of  a  mixed
culture of Nltrosomonas and NUrobacter after  3 hours was  18 mg/l.
    The  oral  LD5Qs  for thlram  In mallard  ducks,  Anas   platyrhynchos,  and
ring-necked pheasants,  Phaslanus  colchlcus. were >2800 and 673,  respectively
(Tucker  and Crabtree,  1970).   Egberts  et  al.  (1972)  reported  no statistic-
ally  significant  effects  1n Japanese  quail, Coturnlx  coturnlx.  offered  feed
0133d                               -34-                             03/31/89

-------
contaminated with 10 ppro thtram  for  11  weeks.   Birds  fed 50 ppm contaminated
feed demonstrated significant reductions 1n numbers of  eggs laid and hatched
and shell thickness  of  eggs.   There were also  significant  reductions 1n the
numbers of lymphocytes, granulocytes and monocytes of  blood from birds dosed
with 50  ppm  thlram-contaminated feed.  Heath  et  al.  {1972}  reported a lack
of mortality  among Japanese  quail,  C.  coturnlx  japonlca.  and  pheasant,  P.
colchlcus,  fed  the  highest  concentration  of  thlram  tested  (5000 ppm  In
feed).    Mallard ducks.  Anas  platyrhynchos.   fed  mash  containing  5000  ppm
thlram had 20% mortality.
    Lorgue  et  al.   (1975)  reported  that   thlram-contaminated  feed (20  gc
Th1rban/I0 kg)  caused  Immediate (24 hours)  blockage  of egg  laying  In  quail
and  regression  of  secondary  sexual characteristics  In males.  Lorgue  and
Soyez  (1976)  reported  that  thlram completely  Inhibited egg laying  by  gray
partridges exposed to  1.6  g/kg within 48 hours.   The  Incidence of embryonic
mortality was  Increased  significantly at 4-fold  lower  doses.   The  LD5_  and
LC50  of  tn1ram  to  Japanese  quail,  C.  coturnlx Japonlca.  were  695  and
>10,000  mg/kg,  respectively   (Gruen  et  al.,  1982).    Hadhazy  and  Glavlts
(1982)   reported  that 100 and  200  g  thlram/100 kg feed  caused  Imperfect  egg
shell  calcification  and production  of  eggs with  abnormal  size and  form In
pheasants.
    Earthworms,  Elsenla foetlda  exposed to  thlram by  Immersion had mortality
levels  ranging  from  5%, 7  days  posttreatment,  to  38X,  101  days posttreatment
(Roark  and Dale, 1979).  worms  fed thlram-treated bermudagrass clippings  had
mortality levels ranging from  10% after  34  days  of  treatment  to  42% after
101 days.   Mortality among worms  reared  1n thlram-treated  soil  ranged from
21X after 10  days  to 98.IX after  29  days and 99.9X after  52  days.   The  ALD
of thlram to wild-trapped deer  mice,  Peromyscus manlcujatus.  was reported to
be 1600 mg/kg  (Schafer  and Bowles,  1985).
0133d                               -35-                             03/31/89

-------
                             5.  PHARHACOKINETICS
5.1.   ABSORPTION
    Pertinent data  regarding  the  absorption  of  thlram  were not  located In
the available literature cited In Appendix A.
5.2.   DISTRIBUTION
    ACGIH  (1986)  stated that  after absorption  (respiratory,  dermal, gastro-
intestinal),  thlram Is widely  distributed,  with much  of the  dose  excreted
unchanged 1n the urine and feces.  Supporting data were not provided.
5.3.   METABOLISM
    In a  general  discussion  of  the  reactions  of  the dlsulflde  analogs of
dlalkyldlthlocarbamates  Including thlram,  Rannug and  Rannug  (1984)  stated
that these compounds have a  tendency  to  participate  1n redox-reactlons.   For
example,  thlram  1s reduced  by glutathlone to  d1methyld1th1ocarbamate  In two
steps as  Illustrated In Figure 5-1.   Thlram may also Interact with SH-groups
of proteins, which could result 1n the Inhibition of a number of enzymes.
    Dalvl  and Deoras   (1986)  studied the  metabolism  of  thlram to  carbon
dlsulflde  In  male Sprague-Dawley rats treated  by 1ntraper1tonea1 Injection.
Rats were treated with thlram 1n corn oil at  doses of 15,  30  or  60  mg/kg,
and expired air  was collected and analyzed for  carbon  dlsulflde for 5 hours
after dosing.  The  results  indicated  a dose-related  Increase In the propor-
tion of  the dose  exhaled  as  carbon  dlsulflde,  with 0.510,  2.334  and 5.435
titnol carbon  dlsulflde/g of  thlram (0.012, 0.056  and 0.13%  of  administered
dose)  exhaled  at  doses  of   15,  30   and 60  mg/kg.  respectively.   Carbon
dlsulflde was detected beginning 1.5-2 hours  after  treatment.   Pretreatment
of  rats  with Intraperltoneal  Injections of  phenobarbltal  to  Induce  mlcro-
somal enzyme activity  resulted  In  a nonsignificant  Increase  In  the amount of
carbon dlsulflde  exhaled  from  a  60  mg/kg  Intraperltoneal  dose  of  thlram.

0133d                               -36-                             03/31/89

-------
        s      s
        II      II
CCH3>|,N-C-S-S-C-N(CH3>2
        ThirM
   •$-G
Glutathionc
                    .1                   IS
            
-------
         Pretreatment  with SKF  S25-A to  Inhibit  mlcrosomal  enzyme activity  resulted
         In  a   significant   (p<0.05)  decrease  In  the  amount  of  carbon  dlsulflde
••     exhaled.   According  to the Investigators, these results  suggest  the  Involve-
         ment of  liver  mlcrosomal  enzymes  In  the  metabolism of  thlram.  Dalvl  and
         Deoras   (1986)   noted   that  Merlevede  and   Peters   (1965)   detected  carbon
         dlsulflde 1n  expired air  following  oral administration of thlram  to  humans.
         5.4.   EXCRETION
             Without  providing  documentation,  ACGIH  (1986)   stated  that  thlram  1s
         "mainly  excreted  unchanged  1n  urine and  feces."   Dalvl and  Deoras  (1986)
         reported  a dose-related  Increase 1n the amount  of  carbon dlsulflde  exhaled
         following the treatment of  rat.s  with an  Intraperltoneal Injection of  thlram
         (15-30  mg/kg).   Other  routes of excretion were not studied.
         5.5.   SUMMARY
             Although  specific  quantitative data  concerning  the pharmacoklnetlcs  of
         thlram  are  limited, ACGIH  (1986)  stated  (without  providing  documentation)
™"     that following  absorption,  thlram .Is widely distributed,   and  Is  predomi-
         nantly  excreted unchanged  In the urine and feces.   Rannug and Rannug  (1984)
         stated  that  thlram  and other  bisulfides have a tendency to participate  In
         redox-reactlons.  Thlram  1s reduced by  glutathlone   to  d1methyld1th1ocarba-
         mate,  and 1t may  also  Interact with SH-groups of proteins,  which may  result
         In the  Inhibition of a  number  of enzymes.   Dalvl and Deoras (1986)  reported
         a dose-related   Increase 1n  the amount  of carbon dlsulflde exhaled  following
         treatment of  rats  with  an  Intraperltoneal Injection of thlram.
€»
         0133d                               -38-                             03/31/89

-------
                                  6.   EFFECTS
6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposure.
    6.1.1.1.   SUBCHRONIC — Pertinent   data   regarding   the  toxldty   of
thlram  following  chronic  Inhalation  exposure  were  not  located  1n  the
available literature cited 1n Appendix A.
    6.1.1.2.   CHRONIC — Flshbeln    (1976)    summarized    a   report    by
Slvlttskaya  (1974)  concerning  ophthalmologlc  changes  In  50 workers  (20-58
years  old)   with  prolonged  occupational  contact  (not otherwise  specified)
with  thlram.   The predominant route of exposure  and  exposure concentrations
were  not  stated.   The Initial symptoms reported  were  lacrlmatlon  and  photo-
phobia,  which  disappeared  after  prolonged   Interruption  of  contact  with
thlram.   Additional  symptoms reported  were  chronic  conjunctivitis,  reduced
visual acuity, delayed  dark  adaption,  reduced  corneal  sensitivity, change In
the  diameter of  the  retinal vessels  and Increased  tonometrlc and  retinal
artery pressure.
6.1.2.   Oral Exposure.
    6.1.2.1.   SUBCHRONIC — In a  13-week  study.  Lee  et al.  (1978) provided
groups of  20 young male CD  rats  with practical  grade thlram In the diet at
0,  0.05,  0.1  or  0.25%.  Variables evaluated Included  general appearance and
behavior,  food  Intake,  body  weights,  comprehensive  hematology  and  blood
chemistry analyses, organ  weights and comprehensive hlstopathologlcal  exami-
nations.  According  to the Investigators, these  diets  provided thlram doses
of. 0, 30,  58 or  132 mg/kg/day.   Body  weight gain  was 81. 64  and  22% of
controls  1n  low-, middle- and high-dose rats.  Statistical  analysis of body
weight  gain  data  was  not  performed.   Food   Intake  was also  reduced  In  a
dose-related  manner  In all treated  groups  compared with controls.  One rat


0133d                               -39-                             03/31/89

-------
treated at  58  mg/kg/day and  five  at 132 mg/kg/day died.   At  132 mg/kg/day,
SGOT and SGPT  were  mildly elevated, while a mild  elevation of BUN was noted
1n  rats  treated at  58 mg/kg/day.   No  changes  In hematologlcal  parameters
were  reported.  The  only  hlstologlcal  effect  observed  was mild  tubular
degeneration of  the  testes  with  atypical  spermatlds  1n  the  epldldymls  1n
rats  treated  at 132  mg/kg/day.   In another report of  this study.  Short  et
al. (1976) stated that  rough  hair  coats  and  alopecia  were observed at 58 and
132 mg/kg/day.  In contrast to the report  by Lee et  al. (1978), Short et al.
(1976) stated that  70% of the rats died at 132 mg/kg/day.
    In a  study by  Lowy et al. (1979,  1980), groups  of  six  young  (0.080 kg)
male Ulstar rats were fed diets  containing thlram (90%  pure) at 0, 225, 300,
450,  600,   900 or  1200  ppm  for  29  days.   Similar  groups   of  rats  were
maintained as  pair-fed  controls.   Based on  food  Intake  and body weight data
provided by  the Investigators  (Lowy  et al.,  1980),  the rats  were  treated
with  thlram at  estimated  doses  of 0,  33.6,  41.9,  54.7,  71.9,  106.7  or 143.4
mg/kg/day.  The  results  Indicated that body  weight  gain  was significantly
reduced (Flsher-Snedecor  F test)  compared with pair-fed controls  at  300 ppm
(41.9  mg/kg/day)  on  study  days  16  and  19,  and was   consistently  reduced
compared with pair-fed  controls at  >450  ppm  (>54.7 mg/kg/day).  Organ weight
measurements Indicated  a  dose-related  decrease 1n the  weights of  epldldymal
fat  pads,  and  perlrenal  fat  pads  that were  significantly  different  from
pair-fed controls  at  all doses.   Dose-related decreases  In  the  weights  of
the kidneys (significant  at  >900 ppm),  testes (significant  at >900  ppm) and
seminal vesicles  (significant at  >450 ppm)  were  also  noted.   Organ weight
data  were  applied   to  a model designed  to  estimate  the lowest dosage that
would  result   In   a  statistically  significant  effect,  and  conventionally
derived levels  of  significance  (p values) were not  provided.  Hlstologlcal


0133d                               -40-                             03/31/89

-------
examinations  and  hematologlcal  analyses  were not  performed.   The use  of
pair-fed controls 1n this study provides  evidence  that  decreased body weight
gain 1s a  result  of thlram treatment rather  than  just  a  result of decreased
food Intake.
    In a 28-day study, Hornshaw et  al.  (1987) fed  groups  of two male and two
female standard dark mink  (5-6 months old) and groups  of  five male and five
female agouti-colored  ferrets  (6-7  months old) thlram  (analytical  grade)  In
the  diet.   N1nk  were  fed  at dietary  levels  of  0,  45   or  82  ppm thlram.
Additional  groups  of  five mink/sex  were  fed at 147  and  265  ppm,  but  these
groups were terminated after  2  weeks because  the minks   avoided  the  diets.
Ferrets were  fed at 0, 8,  20.  50,  125 and 312 ppm.  Based on body weight and
food Intake data  provided by  the authors,  mink were treated  at  doses  of  0,
8.6  or  12.6 mg/kg/day for males,  and 0,  6.6 or  9.5 mg/kg/day  for  females,
and  ferrets were  treated at doses  of 0,  1.1, 2.8, 5.6, 14.8  or  27.5  mg/kg/
day  for males and  0,  1.6, 3.3, 8.6,  16.5  or  44.8  mg/kg/day for females.  No
                         *
treatment-related  deaths were  reported   1n  mink,  and  no  changes   In  organ
weights or  gross  lesions  were observed  at  necropsy (hlstologlcal  examina-
tions were  not performed).   Effects observed In  mink  at  82  ppm Included  a
reduction   In  food  consumption,   loss  of  body  weight  and  bloody  feces.
Hematocrlt  values   for  mink  treated at  45  and  82  ppm   were significantly
(p<0.01) below control  values.  In  ferrets,  all  animals   treated at 312 ppm
died between  days  11  and  16.  Signs of  toxlclty  observed  In these animals
Included  bloody  feces,  Inanition,  Ustlessness,  1ncoord1nat1on and  occa-
sional  convulsions accompanied  by  Intense  vocalization.   Changes In  body
weight were significantly different  from  controls  In  male  ferrets at >20 ppm
(p<0.05) and  In females at >125  ppm (p<0.01).  At  necropsy,  spleen weights
were Increased  In  females  fed at 125 ppm.   No gross  lesions were observed.

0133d                               -41-                             03/31/89

-------
RBC  counts  and  hemoglobin  values  were  significantly  (p<0.01)  reduced  1n
ferrets compared  with controls  at  50 and 125  ppm,  and hematocrH was  also
significantly  reduced (p<0.05)  at  50  ppm.   The  Investigators stated  that
based on this  study,  a dietary NOEL  for mink  was  not found,  while  a level  of
8 ppm  was  a dietary  NOEL  for  ferrets.  This  study 1s difficult  to  Interpret
because  body  weights of  mink  and  ferrets  were  highly  variable,   thlram
treatment decreased food Intake and  group  sizes  were  small.
    6.1.2.2.   CHRONIC — Lee and  Peters  (1976)  reported  neurotoxlclty and
behavioral  effects  of thlram  In CD  rats.   Groups  of  24  rats/sex were fed
diets  containing  practical  grade  thlram  at  0, 0.01,  0.04  or  0.1%  for  80
weeks.  The diets were adjusted  during the study  to  maintain thlram doses  at
about  0,  5.3, 20.4  and 52  mg/kg/day for males  and 0, 6.1,  25.5 and  66.9
mg/kg/day for  females.  The rats were observed  for overt  signs   of  neuro-
behavloral  toxIcHy  and  given  experimental  behavioral   tests   (hind  leg
walking gait,  Jump/climb ability,  open field test).  Among  high-dose  female
rats, eight developed hind limb  ataxla or paralysis.  These  rats became  very
emaciated  near the  end  of  the study.   Hlstologlcal   examinations  of  the
gastrocnemlus  muscle, sciatic  nerve  and  spinal  cord  of   two  ataxlc  rats
revealed demyellnatlon and degeneration of  the sciatic  nerve,  and  degenera-
tion  of  the  lumbar  region  of  the  spinal  cord.   Analysis  of  the hind leg
walking gait  of  female  rats  Indicated a  significant (p<0.05)  difference  In
stride width  and  the angle  between  the  hind feet  In  rats   treated at >25.5
mg/kg/day and  controls.   Nonataxlc high-dose  female rats required signifi-
cantly  (p<0.01)  more  shocks and cleared a  lower height  In the  jump/climb
ability test  compared with  control,  low- and mid-dose  rats.   In   the open-
field  test,  mid-dose males  and  high-dose males and females  (Including  five
ataxlc females) were hyperactive.

0133d                               -42-                             03/31/89

-------
    In a second  part  of this study, groups of 24  female  rats  were fed diets
containing thlram that  provided  dosages  of 0 or 65.8  mg/kg/day  for 36 weeks
(Lee and  Peters, 1976).   Impaired  nerve conduction,  peripheral  neuropathy,
ataxla and  paralysis  were observed  In  4/24.  When picked  up by the  tall,  9
treated rats exhibited hlndfoot clasping.
    Lee et  al.   (1978)  reported  additional effects  observed In the  80-week
rat study described above.   Alopecia was  observed  among ataxlc  and nonataxlc
high-dose rats  and  1n  a  few mid-dose  rats.   It  Is  not  clear If  hair  loss
occurred only  In females  or In  both  sexes.   Body  weight gain was  reduced
compared with  controls  at  all   doses  In males  and  In   high- and  mid-dose
females.  Blood  and  clinical analyses  completed on  four  rats/sex/group  were
similar  to  controls.   At  necropsy, results  of  organ  weight  measurements
showed Increased relative  thyroid and  testes  weight In high-dose  males,  and
Increased  relative   liver,  kidney,  thyroid,  ovary  and  brain  weights  In
high-dose females, with relative spleen weights Increased  In  both high- and
mid-dose  females.   Statistical  analyses  and  actual  values  for  blood  and
clinical chemistry studies and organ weights were  not  provided.   Hlstopatho-
logUal examinations  revealed a  dose-related  Increase 1n the  Incidence  and
severity of  fatty  Infiltration   of  the  pancreas  1n male rats,   with  1/17,
3/13,  11/15  (p=O.OQ01,  Fisher Exact test  run  at  Syracuse  Research Corpora-
tion)  and  14/16 control,  low-,  middle-  and  high-dose rats  affected.   Fatty
Infiltration of  the  pancreas was  found  In only 1/11  high-dose  female rats.
Squamous metaplasia  of  the  thyroid  was  observed  In 4/16  and  3/11 high-dose
male and female  rats,  compared with 1/17 male and 0/18 female  control rats.
Specific  lesions of  the  central  and  peripheral  nervous  systems were  not
observed In  nonataxlc,  ataxlc or  paralyzed  rats,  with the  exception  of  the
lesions reported 1n  two ataxlc rats (Lee and  Peters,  1976).


1)133d                               -43-                             03/31/89

-------
    U.S. EPA  (1987a)  cited  a 2-year Industry study  (E.I.  Ou  Pont de Nemours
& Co.,  n.d.)  In  which groups of 24 rats  (strain and  sex  not  specified)  were
fed thlram  (purity  not provided)  1n  the diet at  0,  TOO, 300,  1000 or  2500
ppro.   Observations   and  tests   reported  Included  body  weight,  mortality,
clinical  signs,   neurological   examination  and  microscopic  examination  of
tissues.   Weakness,   ataxla,  varying  degrees of  hind  11mb  paralysis,  and
calcified masses  In  the basal  ganglia  and cerebellum were observed at  300,
1000  and  2500 ppm.   Additional Information  concerning  this  study was  not
provided.
    Abstracts briefly describe  2-year  Japanese studies using rats  and  dogs.
Malta et  al.  (1980)   fed  diets  containing thlram at  0,  3, 30 or  300 ppm to
groups  of  64 JCL  Wlstar  SPF  rats of  both  sexes.   Examinations  Included
urlnalysls,  hematology,  blood  biochemistry,  ophthalmoscopy,  organ  weights
and hlstopathology.   Interim kills  of  eight  rats/sex/group were  performed at
13,  26  and  52  weeks.   Effects were  restricted  to  the  300  ppm  level  and
Included  reduced food  consumption  and  growth,  reduced erythrocyte  count In
females during  the  first year  of  the  study, and reduced  muscle  mass and an
Increased   Incidence   of  muscle   lesions   (not   specified),   compared   with
controls.   The  Investigators   concluded   that  30  ppm,   equivalent  to  1.15
mg/kg/day for males and 1.39 mg/kg/day for females, was a NOEL.
    SaHo  et  al. (1980)  treated groups  of four beagle dogs/sex  with thlram
1n  gelatin  capsules   at  dosages of 0,  0.4,  4 or 40  mg/kg/day.  Examinations
Included  hematology,  blood  biochemistry,  urlnalysls  and  ophthalmoscopy  at 0,
4,  13,  26,  39, 52, 78 and 104  weeks,  and organ weights and hlstopathology at
termination.   All  dogs  at 40  mg/kg/day  died  within   6-29  weeks.   Other
effects observed at   this dosage Included  vomiting,  salivation,  convulsions,
ocular  changes,  a marked  decrease In erythocyte  counts, and altered  blood

3133d                               -44-                             03/31/89

-------
biochemistry  Including  elevated SGOT  and SGPT.   Some dogs  at 4  mg/kg/day
exhibited vomiting, salivation and clonlc convulsions.  A  slight  to moderate
reduction  In  erythrocyte count  was  observed  during the  first 13 weeks  of
exposure, but  not thereafter.  At termination,  the liver exhibited  hepato-
cellular atrophy and granuloma formation with an  Increase  In  brown  pigmenta-
tion.  No effects were reported at  0.4 mg/kg/day.
6.1.3.   Other  Relevant  Information.   Acute  toxldty  data   for  thlram  are
summarized  In  Table  6-1, which Indicates  that  oral ID™ values have  varied
between  Investigators,  with  2300  mg/kg  In  female  NHRI  mice  (Matthlaschk,
1973) reported as the highest  value, and  190 mg/kg In  female  CD rats  (Lee et
al.,  1978)  reported  as   the  lowest value.   Studies In which  male and  female
rats  or mice  were  studied  separately  appear  to  Indicate  little  gender-
related difference 1n sensitivity.
    Thuranszky  et  al.   (1982)  studied  the   effect  of   thlram  or   carbon
dlsulflde on  the nervous system  of  male Wlstar  rats  treated with a  single
oral  dose.   Endpolnts   examined  were  the  "orientation  of   hypermotllHy"
(measured using  an 1KB  ANIMEX activity meter), analysis of dopamlne  and  the
formation  of   noreplnephrlne  and  eplnephrlne  from 3H-tyros1ne  (rats were
pretreated  with  an 1ntraper1toneal  Injection  of   3H-tyros1ne).  The  results
Indicated that  thlram (240  mg/kg)  or carbon dlsulflde  treatment  (152  mg/kg)
significantly  reduced  the   "orientation  of  hypermotllHy"  (not  otherwise
specified), compared with  untreated  controls.   The effect was  comparable to
meprobamat, a tranqulllzer.   Both   thlram  (60 mg/kg)  and carbon  dlsulflde
(152  mg/kg) resulted In  an  Increase  In  dopamlne levels  and a decrease  In
noreplnephrlne  and  eplnephrlne formation. The  Investigators   suggested that
the  effects  were  consistent  with   a  proposed mechanism  of  Inhibition   of
0133d                               -45-                             03/31/89

-------
                                  TABLE 6-1
                           Acute Toxlclty  of  Thlram
Species/Strain
Rats /Sherman
Rat/CD
Rats/Sherman
Rat/CD ~
Mlce/CO-1
mce/CD-1
M1ce/NHRZ
Rats/M1star
Rats/Sherman
Sex
H
H
F
F
H
F
F
M,F
M,F
Route
oral
oral
oral
oral
oral
oral
oral
l.p.
dermal
LD50
(mg/kg)
640
400
620
190
400
380
2300
248
>2000
Reference
Galnes, 1969
Lee et al., 1978
Galnes, 1969
Lee et al., 1978
Lee et al., 1978
Lee et al., 1978
Hatthlaschk, 1973
PoUou et al., 1978
Galnes, 1969
1.p. = IntraperHoneal
0133d
-46-
03/31/89

-------
dopam1ne-B-hydroxylase activity  and  suggested  that  carbon dlsulflde may  be
responsible  for  at  least   some of  the  nervous  system  effects  observed
following thlram treatment.
    Dalvl  and  Deoras  (1986)  treated   male  Sprague-Oawley   rats  with  an
IntraperUoneal Injection of  thlram  In  corn oil (60 mg/kg) and  examined the
effect  on  hepatic   mlcrosomal   enzymes  5  and  24  hours  after  treatment.
Elevated  serum  sorbHol  dehydrogenase levels  and  SGOT levels were  observed
at 5  and  24 hours,  with significant (p<0.05)  Increases found  24 hours  after
treatment.  Liver cytochrome P-450  activity and benzphetamlne N-demethylase
activity  were  significantly  (p<0.05)  decreased at  24 hours, but not   at  5
hours after dosing.
    Thlram,  similar  In  structure  to  Antabuse,  1s a potent  Inhibitor  of
mlcrosomal  monoxygenases   Including  aldehyde   dehydrogenase  and  dopam,1ne
8-dehydrogenase (ACGIH,  1986).   Combined exposure  to  thlram and  ethanol  can
result In the accumulation  of acetaldehyde.  In  a  study by Garc'la de Torres
et al. (1983),  treatment of  female kllstar  rats  with  two oral  doses of thlram
at  16 or  256  pmol/kg  (3.8 or   61.5  mg/kg) followed  by  an  1ntraper1toneal
Injection  of  ethanol  (2 g/kg)  resulted  In  a  significant  Increase 1n  the
blood  acetaldehyde   level  for  <240  minutes  after  ethanol  treatment.    The
Increase  In blood acetaldehyde  was  still detectable In rats pretreated  with
thlram (16 ymol/kg)  48 hours before  treatment with  ethanol.
    Fenyvesl et al.  (1985)   reported that  combined  oral  treatment of female
Ulstar rats with thlram  (10  mg/kg) and the drugs promethazlne  or meprobamate
(dose  not specified) resulted  In a  potentlatlon of the  CNS  effects of  the
drugs.   Treatment  with  thlram  and  tHhexyphenldyl  resulted  In  an  additive
effect.
0133d                               -47-                             03/31/89

-------
6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY
6.2.1.   Inhalation.   Pertinent   data   regarding  the  carc1nogen1c1ty   of
thlram  following  Inhalation  exposure  were  not  located  In  the  available
literature cited In Appendix A.
6.2.2.   Oral.  In  a  cardnogenlcHy  study  sponsored by BRL  (1968a),  groups
of  18  (C57BL/6xC3H/Anf)Fl  mice/sex  and  18  (C57/BL/6xAKR)Fl  mice/sex  were
treated orally  with commercial  thlram (purity not reported).  Gavage  treat-
ment at a dose  of  10  mg/kg/day  In  gelatin was Initiated when  the  mice  were 7
days old.   At 4 weeks of  age,  the mice were provided with diets  containing
thlram  at  26 ppra.   The IARC  (1976)  review  of this study stated  that  treat-
ment was an  MTD for Infant and  young mice,  but may not  have been  an MTD for
adults.  The  number of mice  surviving  to 78  weeks of age, when  the experi-
ment was  ended, was  16  male and  18  female  (C57BL/6xC3H/Anf)F1  mice and  18
male  and  15  female  (C57/BL/6xAKR)Fl   mice.   Tumor  Incidences   were   not
significantly greater  1n  thlram treated mice compared with 79-90  necropsled
negative control mice of  each  sex and strain,  which had  been treated  with
gelatin or had been left untreated.
    In  an  80-week  study.  Lee et al.  (1978)  did not  observe  Increased tumor
Incidences 1n CD rats  treated with  thlram in  the diet at concentrations  that
provided doses  of  0.  5.3,  20.4  and 52 mg/kg/day for  males and 6.1,  25.5 and
66.9 mg/kg/day  for  females.   Additional  details  of this study are  presented
1n Section 6.1.1.2.
    Takahashl et al.  (1983) examined  the potential cardnogenlcHy  of  thlram
In  F344 rats  treated  for   2  years.  Groups  of  50  rats/sex  were fed diets
containing  thlram  (99.76%  pure) at  0,  0.05  or  0.1X  (0,  500  or  1000 ppm).
Body weights  of the high-dose  rats were  slightly depressed.   No effects  on
mortality,  gross  pathology or  hlstopathology were  observed.   Treated  male


0133d                               -48-                             03/31/89

-------
and female  rats  exhibited a  significantly  lower Incidence of  leukemia than
controls and  historical controls.   Although  not significant,  Incidences  of
pituitary chromophore tumors  1n  females and thyroid  C-cell  adenomas In males
were  also  reduced.    The  Investigators  speculated   that  thlram,  a  known
Inhibitor of  hepatic mlcrosomal  monoxygenases,  may  alter metabolism  or  the
endocrine state of the animal to Inhibit spontaneous  tumor development.
    In  a  study that  examined the cardnogenlclty of  simultaneous  treatment
with  thlram and sodium  nitrite, Lljlnsky (1984) fed  24 male and  24  female
F344 rats a diet containing  thlram at  500 ppm and sodium nitrite at 2000 ppm
for  130 weeks.  Additional  groups of  rats  were fed  the basal  diet,  basal
diet  containing  thlram  (500 ppm)  or  basal   diet  containing sodium  nitrite
(2000  ppm).   The  study  began  at  thlram  concentrations  of 750  ppm,  but
because of  decreased food  Intake the  concentration  was lowered to 500  ppm
after 3 weeks  of  treatment.   Lljlnsky  (1984) noted  that the only biological
effect  observed was  the  production  of  copious amounts of  urine by  rats
treated with  thlram  and nitrite.   No  explanation of  this  effect was  avail-
able,  and  the kidneys  did  not  appear to be adversely  affected.  Only  the
survival of  thlram and nitrite  treated rats  was affected,  with deaths from
treatment-related  tumors.   Tumors  Incidences  that  were  Increased  In  thlram
and  nitrite treated  rats  compared  with  controls were nasal cavity  tumors
(18/24  treated males, 0/24  untreated  control males;  15/24  treated females,
0/24  untreated control  females) and forestomach  tumors  (5/24 treated  males,
0/24  untreated control males;  5/24 treated   females,  0/24  untreated  control
females).   Increased  tumor Incidences  were not  observed In  rats  treated with
only thlram or nitrite.   Lljlnsky (1984)  noted  that  "although this study was
not  large  enough  to  state categorically that  thlram  1s noncardnogenlc  In
rats, we feel  that a  maximally  tolerated  dose was achieved, and that,  there-
fore, the carcinogenic  effect of thlram In  rats. If  any, must be very weak."
0133d                               -49-                             03/31/89

-------
  The  carcinogenic  effect of  simultaneous  treatment  with thlram  and nitrite
  may  be  the  result of  the  formation of  N-n1trosod1methylam1ne.   IARC (1976)
  stated  that  Elespuru and.  Lljlnsky (1973) and  Sen  et al.  (1974)  found  that
'  thlram  reacts  with nitrite  at the acid pH 1n  the  stomach  of  guinea pigs,
  resulting In the formation of N-n1trosod1methy1am1ne.
  6.2.3.   Other  Relevant Information.    BRL  (1968a)  treated  groups  of  18
  (C57BL/6xC3H/Anf)Fl mice/sex  and  18 (C57/BL/6xAKR)Fl mice/sex with a single
  subcutaneous  Injection of  commercial  thlram  1n gelatin at  a dose  of  46.4
  mg/kg.  The mice were  treated  at  28 days of age and observed until -78 weeks
  of age.  Tumor  Incidences  were not Increased compared with  141-161 untreated
  or vehicle  treated controls.   IARC (1976) noted  that  "a single  subcutaneous
  Injection may not be an adequate basis for discounting carc1nogen1c1ty.H
       Goodyear Tire  &  Rubber Co. (1982) reported  that  thlram did  not Increase
  the  frequency  of  transformation 1n BALB/3T3 cells \t± vitro.   The concentra-
  tion  range  tested,  2.8-13.8  pg/mi,  resulted  In 12  to -90% survival.   In
  preliminary tests, no cells survived at  concentrations >25 pg/mt.
  6.3.   MUTAGENICITY
       Hutagenlclty  data  for   thlram  are  summarized In  Table  6-2.   Thlram has
  been  tested  In  numerous   systems  with  Inconsistent  results.    Thlram  has
  generally tested  positive  In  at  least  one  strain of  Salmonella  typhlmurlum
  (TA100)  without  metabolic  activation,   but  the  available  studies  do  not
  clearly  Indicate   1f  S-9  Increases  or   decreases the mutagenlc  activity  of
  thlram.   Nixed results  have  been reported, for several  assays  In Chinese
  hamster  V79 cells,  sex-linked recessive  lethals In  Drosophlla  melanogaster
  and  mlcronucleus  tests  1n  mice.  Tests  reporting positive results for thlram
  Include  mutation  In  CHO   cells   and  Asperqlllus  nldulans.   ONA  damage  In
  Escherlchla coll..  prophage lambda Induction In  E.. coll  and Increases In the


  0133d                               -50-                             03/31/89

-------
X


1
         ^•w
         i
           E
ntral

Dose

         55
                   • «
                  oo in
                o
                o
o?



 |

 «•*


  i
                            en
                            !«•
                             O
                             k 3 X 19 .C C
                           >••« C   •««'—
                           «< «i — •« 3 —
                           — a. • e •— 3 c
                           » Ok T ^B>  e
                           — i« o L.  e«-
                           «< vi K « u o £
                             S—  Q.O — ^
                             •o <«
                 O
                ^  .
                  m
                 vin
                           is ii^ir
                           •• « ^ U W 4) —
                           IS.S.SJ.ct.S
                                            o—
                                            a.
            i ^  01 ^
            X  S. 4>
                          OB co
Sin
f-
                            ,

                          O     S
                   com    —
                       o
                   wn iri o  -»]
o
e
   0133d
                         41
                         we
                         a—
                         ^.2
                          r t.
                         tn u
                  ^S
                  p> 10
                                              gJScUSS
                                              X 41 — *• -O

                                              * SJS £0"



                                              §£?|-f
                                              5 Si "o « 3 —

                                              "S evw 01 feS

                                              iS£§c,7
                                              U I 1 •- Elfl

                                              £^g£Si



                                              £      §
                                                          ••  L.
                                                         O95
                                                        ) « O I- •*>
                                                         «< ^ -- o
                                              > i
                      > <• o  •  e ji  *• — as
                      o> £ -o i *  r-



                      «;|  i11:!!
                       w* O O  0> 9 irt «^
                       IV £ —  t. B C b< 41 4)


                       L> •< "  Ib ^ ^ 01 •
                       B O 4)  — ——> 3 -B C
                       — C I.  ajW —
                     ..        -1

                o*R    2.*    SS'-^g
                e >tm co  < en >>«   ««<«<£•_•
                i-^^-o»  H-«^en   «• w B>^

                                                     e» 4> m
                  |


                  «q
                  i.
S5

i\

  |

  IV
  i
                                   l

                                   IV
                                   ^
                                              »n^

                                              Jit

                                                      § 4»

                                                      *~ <»
                                                      ^^
                                                      o o.
                                                         ^

                                                      S3

                • i-T
                3n*
                                                     w  o>     Of


                                                     1,1     i

                                                     •£ S a.     Q.
                         IS  .
                         » m a»
                                                      S
                                             sS
                     o
                     o   --I
                              o
                              S  -^
                                                                                      *
                 -51-
                                                      |



                                                      03/31/89

-------
     (M





«

u
1
•I
at




„
B


01
I
J


>"v!
•*«/»

«
B
e
*^"
•B 41
U VI
fl
|
|
 M e u
4) — 9V-
gal -B10
S« *-8
85 S-S
»• VI 4) VI
<*- B Dl «
"e *|k

e £ e i- JE o
K«* e o.— x



* *
"**(">

«t 0» vt

+1 +| *l


*
e .a *"" M
»*» a em
• 01 o. 01 ac
e a a e x

C
— 0 vi
*• ~* 41
A -O 3
19 ft «•
w C -0*3 of
O."- » «:,5 ic
s. XB
3 &5 §
IB n «• -^
I fl •*
1 £= ii
5 a. • 
i- 41 • CD « •
f— W I- O Oi •— i— ^
0 W — tj -O •— «»*••* *>
U »l.b>IB4»« 41
1 1^ 7§ >,S "^5 fc "S i>
7 m f e at 9 w ^ eo> i— o» COD

VI
!— IV >i
B •— — Ol VI "O «<«*
O 41 ^ •!«,,— BE 3 —
U^ O u • »— w r- <» •- O u
Ok WOK a •- «• •• •« •— — o

CM Ll •'1 Al ^ vi im i. »» O> Vi 4)
1C P- F-4IIB— Wt-<^««VI
f. O >, >, . ^ OIO1»£C-? 1 41 O>OVk.<— £V3 g o i.£oe,vc£« 01
(V) «•* Irt fi..(jW| |y) J| ^^, CX^pB y «•» ^« ^rf IHP ^
s|
|.u
o ** e
* T» §5
1 * * * ^ u M 1 i|.

S 1 i 1 2 1 2

*l B B B *| g «,
«•>
<*j * m
*™T *" *•• I
Itf I d ° c s
S5 ' o S f * °
••^ * »^ Ct  ^0% S c>
e o a fsi ea ea e a ^ ?
M
e«* Out OKI O VI O VI O VI O vi
IV «< 4) *>ll •— Ol «. 41 •* 4) •• Ol
«| v| -g| v^ v| v| v|
evi— i« o vw IB u  UfivX A'PI^'UV* «•
I" 41 4t 41
VI VI • • • VI
B • S IB IB IB •—
"B IB M £ VI £ VI .C 1—
S 2 T *^ *T * *
VV4tvi4»vi4f vi

^ ? w e^e" g?
e ^ m — at o —IB
*i Bm^ ^ «' — •• n<— vi MbU
^i 513. .Si £i Ii2 st2
-52- 03/31

-------
    W
«
            = 1
entra

e
ntr

Dos

ndlcato

rganlsn
wo  wo

88?  8S?
                                     o

                                   1!
          e


          «
                             il
                   I    S    -=i2

                   £    £    4i7i
                             §^

                             ii
                             -32
                       I
III
S-5  t

ili  f
e «i  o M  — w
•> ft  •< «  ^ ft
  k    k  *. ik
•a a  •o a
ft *•  « *•  ft ft
W i—  "O •—  ^ k
ad

cu
a

cu
       = 1
       ** Hv
          i



       a$i
                                                              i-
                                                            tM
                                                            ep
                                                          •£    ^  f— iv   X
                                           ft 8 «-«-    vo e
                                           i.S»   •  J« c«- §   ».
                                                  t'
                                                •W ft ••
                                                   ^ O k
                                                ft-0 B O ft
                                                •* ft O •> &
                                                iv vi ei g vi
                                                w a e •
                                               U «l U

                                               ^ •* —

                                              »<-> <• K
                         k o. 6 v e  » « • «
                         ~-  k £ "  ,JJ ** ^ S

                         k. o u —• M  K * • >
                                        ft ft      —•*< L. Vl«
                                        k A        e ft   w
                                         $•>      v» « a >» ft
                                                «••,« u*.
                                         k      r- ••«<•-

                                        « *      » 5 * • «
                                                         SS±J

                                                         5i^i?
                         i


                         i


                         a*
                         Is
                         ss
                        HI
                         ?J!
                       *

VI    O

=ft*  t    5
u vi  5»    >-
v,5  "I    |

IS  Ii  8
£ k  3 >»  k
                                     Kv> *
                                     '«


                                   oil'
                                             « U
22
a •
t»


u


ii
                   v >•
                   £ w>
                   u
                                           I
                            • 1! ii
                            V9 fc.f-
                                   I       U   -
                                         i   S   S  -S
                                         5   s.   i  i
                                           VIM    >V 4)  ^  ftftftft


                                           ^1~  J^l  .1  $i$i


                                                     S* ^  a*
                                                   O «1 
-------
number of abnormal sperm and chromosomal aberrations  In  treated  mice.   Tests
reporting negative  results  for  thlram  Include mutation  In  E_.  coll.  sister
chromatld  exchange  and  the  anaphase-telophase  test  In  CHO   cells,  and
unscheduled DNA synthesis In thymus cells from rats and human lymphocytes.
    Rannug and  Rannug  (1984)  proposed   that  mutagenlclty Induced by  thlram
may  result  from  the  Inhibition of  enzymes  Involved  In protecting against
harmful oxygen species.  Thlram may react with  sulfhydryl  groups In  enzymes,
or may react to form  dUhlocarbamate metal  chelate complexes,  decreasing  the
activity of enzyme  systems  requiring  metal  Ions.  Experiments by  Rannug  and
Rannug  (1984)  that  found   Increased  mutagenlclty  1n  S. typhlmurlum  strain
TA100  1n  the presence  of   Increased  oxygen,  copper  sulfate and  menadlone,
which  results   1n  the  formation  of  .large  amounts  of   singlet  oxygen  and
H-Op Inside the cell, support this  hypothesis.
6.4.   TERATOGEHICITY
    Robens  (1969)  studied  the  teratogenldty  of  thlram 1n  Syrian  golden
hamsters.  Groups of  four  to eight pregnant  hamsters were treated by  gavage
with thlram In DMSO or  CMC  at  doses of  0 (vehicle control),  31,  63,  125,  250
or 500 mg/kg  (DMSO)  or  0 (vehicle control),  125,  250, 300 or  500  mg/kg CMC)
on gestation day  7  or 8.  Dams were sacrificed on  gestation day 15, and  the
viability  of  fetuses  was   studied  by  placing  them  In  an  Incubator   for  6
hours.  Maternal  mortality  occurred  In  hamsters at doses >125 mg/kg,  and  at
500  mg/kg  In hamsters  treated with  thlram  In  DMSO  and CMC, respectively.
Litters were  resorbed  completely  from  one  or  more  hamsters  at  >125  mg/kg
thlram  In  DMSO  and  >300  mg/kg thlram In CMC.   There  was a  dose-related
decrease  In  the  number  of  live  fetuses/Utter and  an  Increase  In percent
fetal deaths for  thlram  In  DMSO  and 1n  CMC  groups.  In addition, there was a
dose-related decrease In fetal  weight   for  thlram 1n DMSO  groups.   At  500

0133d                               -54-                             08/24/89

-------
mg/kg/day thlram  1n either vehicle,  there  was 100% fetal  death.   It 1s not
clear how many fetuses were examined  for  visceral and skeletal effects.  The
Investigator  stated that  "the  percentage  of  fetuses  showing  terata  would
probably be  larger  If all of  the fetuses had been  stained and examined for
bone  anomalies.*    It  was difficult  to  assess   the  teratogenlc  effects  of
thlram  In  DMSO because OMSO  1s  teratogenlc.   Robens  (1969)  considered that
the teratogenlc effect of  DMSO and  thlram was additive or slightly more than
additive. The most  common abnormalities  In  thlram-treated and DMSO-control
hamsters were exencephaly  and  fused ribs.   In addition,  a few fetuses In the
thlram  In DMSO  group  were found  to have  heart defects,  predominantly of the
great vessels.  Fused  ribs were   the most common  anomaly  observed 1n fetuses
from hamsters treated with thlram In  CMC.   Although the  effects of thlram In
CMC  on  the  number  of  fetuses/litter,  fetal   mortality,  average  fetal  body
weight  and  the number  of fetuses with  terata appeared  to be dose-related.
statistical   analyses  were   not  performed.    The  Investigator  concluded,
however, that thlram 1n CMC was teratogenlc at >250 mg/kg.
    An  abstract of  a study by Roll  (1971) reported that  thlram was terato-
genlc to  NMRI and  SU  mice.   The mice were  treated between  gestation  day  6
and  17  and  "during other stages of gestation."   There  was  a dose-related
Increase  In  resorptlons  and   "Impaired fetal  development".  Mice  were most
susceptible  when  treated  on  gestation  day 12 and 13.   NMRI mice  were more
susceptible  than  SU mice   to  the development  of  cleft palate.   The "terato-
genlcally Ineffective dose" was estimated to be -250 mg/kg.
    Matthlaschk  (1973) reported Increased  resorptlons   and  a  dose-related
Incidence of malformations In fetuses from  NMRI  mice  treated  orally  with
thlram  at  10, 20  or  30 mg/an1maI/day on gestation  days  S-1S.   Simultaneous
oral treatment  with thlram and  Intraperltoneal Injection  with  L-cyste1ne at

0133d                               -55-                             08/24/89

-------
2.5  or  5 rag/mouse  on gestation  days  5-15  reduced  the severity  of malfor-
mations but not the number  of  malformations.  Oral  treatment with thlram (30
mg/kg)  on  gestation  days  12-13  Increased  the  number  of  malformations
compared with  treatment on  gestation  days  5-15.   Simultaneous treatment with
thlram  and  L-cystelne at  10 mg/kg  (days  of treatment  unspecified) reduced
the number of malformations.
    Short et  al.  (1976) treated  groups  of 10-32 pregnant CD  rats by gavage
with  thlram (practical grade)  1n  CMC  at  doses  of  0,  40,   90.  136 or  164
mg/kg/day on  gestation  days 6-15, or at 200 mg/kg/day  on  gestation  day 6 or
7-12.   For  calculation  of  doses,  "the  thlram preparation was  considered to
be pure and no corrections  were  made for  Inactive  Ingredients."   Rats were
sacrificed  on  gestation day  20;  50% of the fetuses were examined  for soft
tissue  anomalies;  and  the remaining  fetuses  were examined for  skeletal
anomalies.  At 200 mg/kg/day,  only  6/18  rats survived.   Body weight  gain and
food  consumption  were   significantly   depressed   1n  all  treated   groups.
Treatment resulted  In a  significant  decrease In  the number  of  fetuses/dam
and a corresponding Increase  In resorptlons at  levels >136 mg/kg/day.  Fetal
body  weight  was  significantly   reduced  at  all  doses.   The  Investigators
reported  higher  Incidences  of  hydrocephalus, domed  cranium split  or  lobed
antra and decreased ossification  1n rats treated at  136  mg/kg compared with
controls, although  statistical  analysis of  these  data  was  not  performed.
Incidences at other doses were not reported.
    Short  et   al.  (1976)  also completed   a  teratogenlclty   study  In  which
groups  of  18-19  pregnant  Swiss-Webster flilce were   treated  by gavage with
thlram  (practical  grade)  In  CMC at doses of 0,  100  or  300 mg/kg/day  on
gestation days 6-14.  Mice  were sacrificed  on gestation day  18.  Half of the
fetuses were  examined for  soft tissue  anomalies  and half were examined for
0133d                               -56-                             08/24/89

-------
skeletal  anomalies.   At  300  mg/kg,  4/18  mice  died.   No  effects  on  body
weight  gain  of  dams,  Utter  size,  Incidence of  resorptlons or  fetal  body
weights  were  observed.   An   Increased  Incidence  of  hydrocephalus,  hydro-
nephrosls, collapsed  cranium,  malallgned sternebrae, eye  and cardiovascular
defects was  observed  at  300 mg/kg.  Short et  al.  (1976)  concluded that rats
were more sensitive than mice to the developmental toxic effects of thlram.
    Short  et al.  (1976)  also  conducted a  study  regarding  the  effects  of
perl- and  postnatal  thlram  (practical  grade)  treatment  In  rats.   In  this
study,  groups  of 10-20  pregnant rats were provided  with  diets containing 0,
0.03  or  0.1%   thlram  from  day  16  of gestation  to  postpartum  day  21.
Practical grade  thlram doses were  0,  17  and  26 mg/kg/day before birth and 0,
51 and  115 mg/kg/day after  birth.   A control group of  food-restricted rats
was  also  maintained.   Directly  after  birth,  pups of   six  thlram-treated
dams/group were  exchanged with  control pups  1n a cross-fostering experiment.
Food  consumption and body  weights  of  dams  were  reduced 1n  both treatment
groups, although at the low  dose,  body weights returned  to normal by the end
of  the experiment.   Body  weights  of   food-restricted  rats  were depressed
throughout lactation.   Survival of  pups from dams  treated  at  0.03% thlram
was  not affected.  However,  pup  body weights were significantly decreased
throughout the period of lactation.  At  0.1% thlram, there was a significant
decrease  1n  pup  body  weights  on  days  0  and 4  and In  survivors on day 4
(viability  Index);  there  were no  survivors  at  weaning.   In   the  cross-
fostering experiment, survival  and body  weights of  offspring  from untreated
dams  placed  with  treated  dams   (0.1%)  were   significantly  reduced;   1n
contrast,  survival  of  prenatally  exposed  pups  (0.1%)  nursed  by untreated
dams  was  normal, and  body   weights,   which  were  Initially  significantly
depressed, reached control  values by day  21.

0133d                               -57-                              08/24/89

-------
    In a  BRL  (1968b) study,  eight  pregnant BL6 mice and  seven pregnant AKR
mice were treated by  subcutaneous  Injection with  thlram In DMSO on gestation
days 6-14  (BL6)  or 6-15  (AKR).   BL6 mice  were  treated at 10  mg/kg/day and
AKR mice  were treated at  115 mg/kg/day.   Maternal weight  gain was signifi-
cantly  (p<0.05)  decreased  In  AKR  mice.   A  number  of  abnormalities  were
reported  In  BL6 mice,  but  the abnormalities were  similar In  type  to  those
observed  In  DMSO-treated  controls.  Because only  one dose was  studied  In  a
small number of mice, no conclusions can be made from this study.
6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
    Mshbeln  (1976)   summarized  a  study  by Davydova  (1973)  concerning  the
reproductive function of female albino  rats exposed to  thlram by Inhalation.
Female rats  (number  unspecified)  were  exposed  to thlram  (purity  not  speci-
fied)  at  concentrations of  3.8+0.058  mg/m3,  6  hours/day,  5  days/week  for
4.5 months.  No  Information concerning  controls was provided.   Effects  noted
Included  an  extension of  the estrous  cycle at  the  expense  of  the  resting
phase  during  the  beginning  of   the study  (the  estrous  cycle returned  to
normal  by  the  end   of  the  study),  reduced   rate  of  conception,  reduced
fertility and  reduced  body  weights of  fetuses.   No additional  Information
regarding this study was reported 1n F1shbe1n (1976).
    Short et  al.  (1976)  studied  the  effects  of  thlram on  reproduction  In
male and  female  CO rats.   In the  study on male  reproduction, groups of  20
male rats were  fed  thlram In  the diet at 0, 0.05, 0.1  or  0.25X for 13 weeks
before mating with untreated  controls  (see  Section 6.1.2.1.).   Based  on  food
Intake  and  body  weight  data,  the Investigators  Indicated  that  the  rats
consumed 0,  30,  58  or  132 mg  practical  grade thlram/kg/day.   On  gestation
day  13,   half  of  the  females  were sacrificed,  while  the  remaining  were
allowed to deliver; the pups  were  examined  at  birth and on postpartum days  4
0133d
-58-
08/23/89

-------
and 21.  Thlrara at  30  and  58 mg/kg/day had no effect on the ability of males
to  fertilize  females.   Hale  animals  In  the  58 and  132  mg/kg/day  groups
exhibited loss of hair and  had  rough coats;  70% of males In the latter group
died.   At   132 mg/kg/day,  males  failed   to  Inseminate females.  Testlcular
lesions  (hypoplasla,  tubular degeneration,  and  atypical  spermatlds  1n  the
epldldymls)  were  observed  1n   <50%  of   the   rats  with  Impaired  breeding
performance.
    In the  reproductive  study In female rats  (Short  et a!.,  1976), groups of
20  virgin  females  were provided with  thlram  In the  diet at 0,  0.04 or  0.2%
(0, 30  or  96  mg practical  grade thlram/kg/day) for  at  least  14 days  before
mating  with untreated males.   After  mating,  all female  rats were fed  the
•control  diet.   On  gestation day  13,  half of  the females  were sacrificed,
while the remaining females were allowed  to deliver;  the  pups were examined
at  birth and  on postpartum days  4 and  21.   Body  weights of  female  rats
treated  with thlram at  30 or  96  mg/kg/day  were  94  and 74%  of  the control
value after  2  weeks of  treatment.   At 30 mg/kg/day,  significant reductions
In  the number  of Implants/dam  (11.9 vs. 14.4  1n controls)  and pups/dam (10.8
vs.  12.9 1n controls) were observed.  Treatment  at 96 mg/kg/day prolonged
the  dlestrous  phase of  the estrous cycle.  Only 1/20 rats at  96 mg/kg/day
was  mated  successfully,  with  5/20  dead  after 4.5  weeks  of  treatment.  The
effect of 96 mg/kg/day thlram treatment on estrous cycle was reversible;  9/9
rats became  pregnant within 9 days  of being  transferred to the control diet.
The  number  of  Implants  (9.5)  and  embryos (8.5)  was reduced  In  this  group.
although  no effect on  fertility  Index,  gestation   Index   or  the  ratio  of
viable embryos to Implants was noted.
    Hornshaw et  al.  (1987) completed  reproductive  studies  where  mink  were
fed  thlram  for  20  weeks  and  ferrets were fed thlram  for  24 weeks  1n  the
0133d                               -59-                             08/24/89

-------
diet.  Groups of 4 male  and  12  female mink were fed thlram 1n the diet at 0,
2.5, 10 or  40 ppm,  and similar  groups of ferrets were fed at  0.  4,  16 or 64
ppm.   Based  on food Intake  and  body weight data  during 8 weeks  before  the
breeding season, dosages for male mink were  estimated  at 0,  0.5,  1.4 and  6.1
mg/kg/day, for female mink at 0, 0.4,  1.5  or 5.7 mg/kg/day,  for male ferrets
at 0,  0.6, 2.7 or 10 mg/kg/day  and  for female  ferrets  at 0,  0.61, 2.1 or  7.0
mg/kg/day.   The  animals  were treated  until  the  kits  were  weaned.   After
weaning,  four adult  males  and  four adult  females  from each  group were
necropsled,  organ  weights  (brain,   liver,  spleen, kidney,  heart and  lung)
were recorded and hematologlc parameters  were determined.
    Body weight  changes, reported  for  the first  8  weeks  of  the  study,  are
difficult to  Interpret because  female ferrets  and, to a  lesser extent, mink
tend  to  reduce  food  consumption  and  lose  body  weight  as  they  approach
estrus.   The  only  body  weight  changes  that  were significantly  different
compared with controls were  In male  mink at  40 ppm and female ferrets (which
lost less weight than controls) at  64  ppm.   The Investigators  suggested that
In ferrets at  64 ppm the normal pre-estrus  pattern may  have  been disrupted;
only 7/12  females  were  In estrus  (vulvar  swelling) after 8 weeks  of treat-
ment.  Thlram treatment  did  not result In  signs  of Intoxication or deaths In
either  species.  Gross  lesions  were  not observed  at necropsy, and  no  birth
defects were  observed.   The  only  significant effect on  reproduction  1n mink
was  a  decrease  In  average  birth weight at 40  ppm.   At  40  ppm, only 7/12
female mink  whelped  compared with  10/12 controls,  and 6/9 and 11/11  at  2.5
and  10.0  ppm,  respectively.   In  ferrets,  no  females  at 64  ppm  whelped,
compared with  12/12  controls, and  9/12  and 8/12  at 4  and  16 ppm,  respec-
tively.  At  16 ppm,  the number of  ferrets/Utter  was reduced  (10.6/lltter,
controls;   8.2/lHter,  16  ppm);  ferret Utter weights  were  significantly


0133d                               -60-                              08/24/89

-------
reduced at  birth,  3 and 6  weeks;  and average kit body weights  were reduced
at  3  weeks.  For  both  mink and ferrets,  the Investigators stated  that  kit
survival was dose-related.   Kit  survival  was 85.0, 80.0,  73.6  and 72.2% for
control,  low-,  middle- and  high-dose mink,  and  94.1,  89.2 and 81.5%  for
control,  low- and  middle-dose  ferrets   kits  surviving   for  6  weeks.   At
necropsy,  spleen  weights  of  adults  were  Increased  significantly  compared
with  controls  at  40  ppm  In mink, and  at  16  and 64  ppm In  ferrets.   RBC
counts,  hemoglobin concentration  and  hematocrlt were  reduced  significantly
at 40 ppm 1n mink and 64 ppm In ferrets.
6.6.   SUMMARY
    Data  regarding the  toxlclty of  thUam following Inhalation  exposure  of
animals were  not located.   S1v1t1skaya (1974, summarized  by  Flshbeln,  1976)
reported ophthalmologlc changes  In persons  occupationally  exposed to thlram.
Exposure concentrations  were not reported.
    The  most  notable   effect  observed  In  animals   following  chronic  oral
exposure  to thlram Is  ataxla and hind  leg paralysis  observed  In  rats  fed
thlram  In  the  diet at  >300  ppm  (E.I.  Du  Pont de Nemours  and Co.,  n.d.;  Lee
and  Peters, 1976).   Neurotoxlc effects   following  exposure to thlram  may
result  from the production  of carbon dlsulflde.  Thuranszky  et al.  (1982)
found  similar  effects  on  the  nervous system when rats were treated with  a
single oral dose of thlram or carbon  dlsulflde.
    Dietary  treatment  of  animals  with thlram has consistently  resulted  In
decreased  food  Intake  and  body  weight  gain.    The  study  by  Lowy et  al.
(1980), which  found that body weight  gain 1n thlram treated rats  was  below
pair-fed controls,  Indicates that  the effect on body weight Is  a  result  of
thlram  treatment  rather than  Just a  result  of  decreased food  Intake.   The
lowest  dietary  concentration  of  thlram  resulting 1n decreased  body  weight
gain In rats was 100 ppm  (Lee  et al.,  1978).  A  study using mink and ferrets

0133d                               -61-                              08/24/89

-------
(Hornshaw et al., 1987} did not  clearly  Identify  levels  resulting 1n changes
1n body weight  because  of the small numbers of animals  used,  and because  of
the high variability of body weight of the animals used In the study.
    Thlram  Is  an Inhibitor  of  mlcrosomal  monoxygenases  Including  aldehyde
dehydrogenase and dopamlne B-dehydrogenase.  Combined  exposure to thlram and
ethanol has been shown  to result In  the  accumulation  of  acetaldehyde (Garcia
de  Torres  et   al.,  1983).   Interactions  between  thlram and  prometazlne,
meprobamate  and trlhexyhenldyl  have also  been  reported  (Fenyvesl  et  al.,
1985).  Oral  cardnogenldty  studies of  thlram  In rats  (Lee et  al.,  1978;
Takahashl et al., 1983; LlJInsky, 1984}  and a  limited cardnogenldty  study
In mice  (BRL,  1968a)  have not found a carcinogenic effect.   LlJInsky  (1984}
found  that  simultaneous  oral   treatment  of  rats  with  thlram  and  sodium
nitrite significantly  Increased  nasal cavity  and forestomach  tumors.   This
effect probably was  due to the in vivo formation of  N-n1trosod1methylam1ne.
    Nutagenlclty studies of thlram have yielded mixed  results,  with  numerous
positive and  negative  studies available.   Rannug and  Rannug  (1984)  proposed
that  mutagenlclty   Induced  by   thlram may  result  from  the  Inhibition  of
enzymes that are Involved 1n protecting against harmful oxygen species.
    Oral  teratogenlclty  studies 1n  hamsters   (Robens,   1969),  mice  (Roll,
1971; Matthlaschk,  1973;  Short  et al.,  1976)  and rats (Short et  al.,  1976)
have  reported  an   Increased   Incidence   of resorptlons  and  malformations
observed prenatally and reduced  viability and  growth, postnatally.  In  some
Instances, the findings were observed 1n  the presence  of  maternal  toxldty.
    Oral  studies concerning  the  effects  of thlram on reproduction  1n  rats
(Short et al.,  1976) Indicate  that at 132 mg/kg/day the  30% of the males who
survived  failed to  Inseminate females and exhibited  testlcular  lesions.   A
dose  of  30 mg/kg/day  given to  females  reduced the number  of  Implants/dam.

0133d                               -62-                              08/24/89

-------
Treatment at  96  mg/kg/day resulted In  only  1  of the 15  female-survivors  to
mate successfully.  A cross-fostering experiment  (Short et al.,  1976),  which
found reduced  survival  of  offspring  from untreated dams  placed  with  treated
dams  Indicates that  developing rats  are still  sensitive  to  thlram  post-
natally.  Results  of  a  reproductive study using mink and ferrets  (Hornshaw
et al., 1987}  Indicates that ferrets may  be  more sensitive  than  mink  or rats
to the  reproductive effects  of  thlram;  0/12  female ferrets  produced  Utters
at a dose of  7 mg/kg/day.   In addition,  exposure to  2.1 mg/kg/day  produced  a
decrease  In  the  number of  offspring/Utter  and  In  offspring body weights.
In the  adult  animals, there was an Increase In  splenic  weight  at 2.1  and  7
mg/kg/day and a decrease 1n RBCs, hemoglobin  and  hematocrU at 7  mg/kg/day.
0133d
-63-
08/24/89

-------
                     7.   EXISTING GUIDELINES AND  STANDARDS
7.1.   HUNAN
    The  OSHA  (1985)  PEL  for  thlram  Is  5  mg/ma.  The  AC6IH  (1987)  TLV-TWA
was  recently  lowered  from  5  to 1  mg/m3,   based  on  the probability  that
clinical symptoms 1n exposed workers occurred  at  concentrations >1.0 mg/m3.
    Tolerances  for  thlram on  raw agricultural  products are  7 ppm In or  on
apples, celery, peaches, strawberries,  tomatoes  and bananas  (not  more than  1
ppb  shall  be  In the pulp after  the  peel  Is  removed and discarded),  and  0.5
ppm 1n or on onions (U.S. EPA, 1986a).
    U.S. EPA  (1984a)  determined that data were  Insufficient  for  Identifica-
tion  of  a  NOEL;  therefore,  an  MPI  could not be  calculated.  The  verified
oral  RfD for  thlram Is  0.005 mg/kg/day (U.S. EPA, 1987c);  the derivation  is
discussed  In  Section 8.2.2.2.   The  RQ for   thlram  Is  10  pounds, based  on
aquatic toxIcHy data (U.S.  EPA, 1988).
7.2.   AQUATIC
    Guidelines  and  standards  for  the  protection   of  aquatic   life  from
exposure to tetramethylthluram  dlsulflde  (thlram)  were  not  located  In  the
available literature dted In Appendix A.
0133d
-64-
08/23/89

-------
                             8.  RISK ASSESSMENT

    Statements  concerning  available  literature In  this document  refer  to
published,  quotable  sources  and  are  In  no  way  meant   to   Imply   that
confidential  business  Information   (CBI),  which  this  document  could  not
address,  are  not In  existence.   From examination of  the bibliographies  of
the CBI data,  however.  It  was  determined that CBI data  that  would alter  the
approach  to risk assessment  or the  risk  assessment  values presented herein
do not exist.
8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY
8.1.1.   Inhalation.   Pertinent  data   regarding   the   cardnogenlcHy   of
thlram  following  Inhalation  exposure  were  not   located  1n  the available
literature cited 1n Appendix  A.
8.1.2.   Oral.   In  a  BRL  (1968a)  study,  thlram tested negative  for  carclno-
genldty  1n  (C57BL/6xC3H/Anf)F1  mice and  In  (C57/8L/6xAKR)F1  mice.    This
study Is  limited;  only  one dose level was used, and  1t  Is  not clear If  the
mice received an MTD throughout  the  study.
    Additional oral chronic  studies  In  rats  (Lee et al., 1978;  Takahashl  et
al.,  1983;  Lljlnsky,  1984} also reported negative results for cardnogenlc-
Hy.  The study  by  Takahashl  et  al.  (1983)  reported  significantly   lower
Incidences of  leukemia  In thlram  treated  rats  (0,  500  or 1000 ppm In  the
diet) compared  with controls.   The  Investigators  speculated  that thlram, a
known Inhibitor  of  hepatic mlcrosomal monoxygenases, may alter metabolism to
Inhibit  tumor development  or   may   Inhibit  mlcrosomal   activation  of   other
chemical  carcinogens.   Lljlnsky (1984)  found that thlram  was not  carcino-
genic when given to rats  In  the diet at 500  ppm,  but that thlram (500  ppm)
and  nitrite  (2000  ppm)  In  the  diet significantly Increased the number  of


0133d                               -65-                              08/23/89

-------
nasal cavity tumors and the number of  forestomach  tumors.   The  cardnogenlc-
Ity of  thlram  and nitrite treatment may  be  the result of .In. vivo  formation
of N-n1tro-sod1methylam1net a  potent  carcinogen.
8.1.3.   Other  Routes.  BRL (1968a)  reported  negative results  1n a  cardno-
genlclty  study  1n which  28-day-old  mice  were given  a  single  subcutaneous
Injection of thlram  (46.4 mg/kg) and  observed until  78  weeks of age.   IARC
(1976)  noted  that "a  single  subcutaneous Injection  may  not  be an  adequate
basis for discounting cardnogenlclty."
8.1.4.   Height of Evidence.  No  data  were available regarding  the  cardno-
genlclty of thlram In  humans.   The  available data Indicate no  evidence  of a
carcinogenic effect In mice or rats  treated with  thlram, but  the animal  data
base Is Inadequate.  According to U.S. EPA (1986b) guidelines,  thlram can be
placed In EPA group D: not classifiable as to human cardnogenlclty.
8.1.5.   Quantitative  Risk  Estimates.   The  lack  of  Inhalation cardnogen-
lclty data  and  the lack  of positive oral cardnogenlclty data  preclude the
derivation of carcinogenic potency factors for thlram.
8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
8.2.1.   Inhalation  Exposure.   Flshbeln  (1976)  summarized   a  study  by
Slvltskaya  (1974) that   reported  ophthalmologlc  changes  In  workers   with
prolonged occupational  contact  with  thlram.   Because estimates of  exposure
levels were not provided,  this Information 1s  not  useful for risk assessment.
    The only Inhalation study In animals  was  a  reproductive study using  rats
(Davydova,  1973)  summarized by  Flshbeln   (1976).   In  this  study, effects on
reproduction (extension  of the  estrous  cycle, reduced  rate  of conception,
reduced fertility and  underweight fetuses) were observed  In rats exposed to
thlram at a concentration of  3.8+0.058 mg/m3,  6  hours/day, 5  days/week for
4.5 months.  This  study was  reported Inadequately for proper evaluation and
1s therefore not suitable  for  risk assessment.
0133d                              -66-                              08/23/89

-------
    The  lack  of  Inhalation  data  useful  for  risk  assessment precludes  the
derivation of subchronlc and chronic Inhalation RfDs.
8.2.2.   Oral Exposure.
    8.2.2.1.   LESS  THAN  LIFETIME  EXPOSURES  (SUBCHRONIC) — Lowy  et  al.
(1980)  fed groups  of  six  young  male Wlstar  rats  thlram In  the diet  at
concentrations  that  provided doses  of  0, 33.6,  41.9,  54.7, 71.9,  106.7  or
143.4  rag/kg/day for  29  days.   Similar  groups of  pair-fed rats were  main-
tained  as  controls.   Body  weight  gain  was  consistently  different  from
pair-fed controls at  >54.7  mg/kg/day.  Organ  weight measurements  Indicated a
dose-related decrease 1n the weights  of epldldymal  fat  pads and  perlrenal
fat pads  that  was  significant at all doses.   Hlstologlcal  examinations were
not completed.   Because only one  sex  and small  numbers  of rats were  used,
and because hematology  and  hlstopathology were not evaluated, this  study  1s
not sufficient  for  risk assessment.   The use  of pair-fed controls  In this
study  provides  evidence  that  decreased body  weight gain Is  a result  of
thlram treatment, rather than just a result of decreased  food Intake.
    Lee  et  al.  (1978) provided  groups of  20 young male rats with  thlram  In
the diet at concentrations  that provided doses  of 30,  58 or 132  mg/kg/day
for 13 weeks.   Food  Intake  was  decreased  and  body weight  gain was 81,  64 and
22X of controls at 30,  58 or  132 mg/kg/day,  respectively.   At 132 mg/kg/day,
18X  of  the  rats  died  (Short   et  al..   1976),  SGOT  and  SGPT  were  mildly
elevated and mild tubular degeneration of  the testes  was  noted.   M1ld  eleva-
tion  of  BUN was  reported   at  58  mg/kg/day.   The  lowest  dose  used In this
study  can  be  considered  a  LOAEL,  which resulted  In decreased  body  weight
gain.  This study 1s limited by the use of only male rats.
    Teratogenlclty studies  using hamsters (Robens, 1969).  mice  (Roll,  1971;
Hatthlaschk, 1973;  Short et al.,  1976;  BRL,  1968b) and rats (Short et al.,
0133d
-67-
08/23/89

-------
1976) have  reported  an Increased Incidence of  resorptlons  and malformations
observed prenatally  and  reduced viability and  growth,  postnatally.   In  some
Instances, the findings  were  observed 1n the presence  of  maternal  toxldty.
The  studies  by Robens (1969)  and  BRL (1968b)  are  confounded  by the  use  of
DMSO, a  teratogen,  as the  vehicle.  In  reproductive studies, Short  et  al.
(1976)  found  that  reproduction  was  affected  In  male  rats  mated  with
untreated females at an  oral  dose  of 132 mg/kg/day (13 weeks), a  dose  that
also  resulted  1n  deaths, and  In female  rats  mated to untreated males at  30
and  96  mg/kg/day  (96  mg/kg/day  also   resulted  In  deaths).   In  a  cross-
fostering experiment (Short  et al.,  1976),  survival  and  body  weights  of
offspring from untreated rats  placed with treated  rats  (0.1% In  the diet,
115 mg/kg/day} were  reduced.   This  experiment Indicates  that developing  rats
exposed  to  thlram  postnatally are  still susceptible  to  the  developmental
effects.
    Hornshaw et al.  (1987) fed groups of  2 male and 2 female mink and 5  male
and  5  female  ferrets thlram  1n  the  diet for  28 days at  concentrations  that
provided  doses of  0,  8.6 or  12.6 mg/kg/day for  male  mink,  0,  6.6  or  9.5
mg/kg/day for  female mink, 0,  1.1,  2.8,  5.6,  14.8  or 27.5 mg/kg/day for  male
ferrets, and  0,  1.6,  3.3,  8.6, 16.5 or  44.8 mg/kg/day for female  ferrets.
The  only effects  noted  In  mink   were   significantly  decreased  hematocrlt
values  at  both  doses and  a  reduction  In food  consumption,  loss of  body
weight  and  bloody  feces  at  the   high  dose  (12.6  mg/kg/day  males,   9.5
mg/kg/day females).   All high-dose  male (27.5 mg/kg/day)  and female  (44.8
mg/kg/day} ferrets died  between  days 11  and 16.  Signs  of  toxlclty observed
In these animals Included bloody feces,  Inanition,  Ustlessness,  Incoordlna-
tlon  and  occasional  convulsions   accompanied by  Intense  vocalizations.
Changes In body weights were  significantly different  1n male ferrets  at  >2.8


0133d                               -68-                              08/24/89

-------
rag/kg/day and  In females  at  >16.5 mg/kg/day.   At necropsy,  spleen  weights
were  Increased  1n  female  ferrets at  16.5  mg/kg/day,  and  RBC counts  and
hemoglobin  counts  were significantly  reduced at  5.6  and  14.8  mg/kg/day  In
males, and 8.6 and 16.5 mg/kg/ day In females.
    Hornshaw et  al.  (1987) also completed  reproductive  studies  where groups
of  4  male and 12 female mink  (20  weeks)  and similar  numbers  of ferrets  (24
weeks) were  fed  thlram 1n the diet  at  concentrations  0, 2.5, 10 and 40  ppm
for mink  and  0,  4, 16 or 64 ppm for  ferrets.  Based on  food Intake and body
weight data  for  the  first 8 weeks of the  study,  the diets  provided doses  of
0,  0.5,  1.4  or 6.1 mg/kg/day In male mink,  0,  0.4, 1.5 or  5.7  mg/kg/day  1n
female mink, 0,  0.6,  2.7  or  10 mg/kg/day  In male ferrets and 0,  0.61, 2.1  or
7.0 mg/kg/day  In female  ferrets.   The accuracy  of these dose  estimates  Is
unclear;  female  ferrets and  to  a lesser  extent  female  mink  tend  to reduce
feed  consumption and  lose body weight  as  they  approach  estrus,  so actual
doses  during  gestation and weaning  may  have been  higher.   The  animals were
treated  until  the kits  were weaned.   The  Investigators  suggested  that  1n
female ferrets at  7  mg/kg/day,  the  normal pre-estrus  pattern may  have been
disrupted; only  7/12  females  were In estrus  (vulvar swelling) after  8 weeks
of  treatment.
    Thlram  treatment  did  not  result  1n signs  of  Intoxication  or  deaths  1n
either species.   Gross lesions were  not  observed at  necropsy,  and no birth
defects were observed.   The  only significant effect on  reproduction  In mink
was a decrease  1n average birth  weight  at  the  high  dose.   In  ferrets,  no
females  at  7 mg/kg/day  whelped,  compared with  12/12  controls  and 9/12  and
8/12  at   the  low and middle  dose, respectively.   At  the  middle dose,  (2.1
mg/kg/day In females),  the number  of  offspring/Utter  was  reduced and ferret
Utter  weights  were  reduced  significantly  at  birth,  3  and 6 weeks,  and

0133d                               -69-                             08/23/89

-------
average kit body weights were  reduced  at  3 weeks.   For both mink and ferret,
the  Investigators  stated  that kit  survival was  dose-related;  85.0,  80.0,
73.6 and  72.2% survived 1n  control,  low-, middle- and high-dose  mink  kits,
and 94.1, 89.2 and 81.5% control,  low- and middle-dose ferret kits surviving
for 6 weeks.   Kit  survival data are not  considered  In the Identification of
a  LOAEL  and  NOAEL  for reproduction  because  the  data  reported cannot  be
statistically  analyzed.   This  study appears  to Identify a  reproductive  PEL
for ferrets  of -1 mg/kg/day,  a  LOAEL  of  2.1 mg/kg/day and a  NOAEL  of  0.61
mg/kg/day.
    It  appears  that  the ferret  is  the species  most sensitive  to  thlram and
that the  critical  effect  1n this species  Involves  Impaired  female reproduc-
tion.   In the reproduction  study  by  Hornshaw  et  al.   (1987),  2.1  mg/kg/day
was a LOAEL and 0.61 mg/kg/day was  a  NOAEL for  reproductive effects.   An RfD
for subchronlc  oral  exposure  to thlram can be  derived by application of an
uncertainty factor of  100:  10 for  extrapolation  from  animals  to  humans  and
10  to  provide additional  protection for  unusually  sensitive humans, to  the
reproduction  NOAEL  1n  ferrets of   0.61  mg/kg/day   (Hornshaw et al.,  1987).
The RfD 1s  0.006 mg/kg/day.   Confidence  In the data  base  Is medium  because
the  chronic,  developmental  and  reproductive  toxldty of  thlram have  been
Investigated  In  a wide range of  experimental  species,  although no multi-
generation  study  has  been  reported.   Confidence   1n  the key  study  1s  low
because  group  sizes  were   small,   hlstopathologlcal   examinations  were  not
performed,  and because variable  food  Intake  and body  weight  data  made
reliable  estimation  of dosage levels   difficult.   Data obtained  from  other
species,  however,  suggest  that  the  NOAEL  for  reproduction  In ferrets  Is
below  dosages  1n other   species   associated  with  CNS  signs,  hematologlc
effects and hlstopathologlc lesions.  Confidence In  the RfD Is medium.
0133d
-70-
08/23/89

-------
    8.2.2.2.   CHRONIC EXPOSURE — The  verified oral  RfD  (U.S.  EPA,  1987c)
1s based  on an  unpublished  study 1n  rats (E.I.  Du  Pont  de Nemours  & Co.,
Inc., n.d.) In which  groups  of  24 rats  (strain and sex unspecified) were fed
diets  containing  thlram  at  0,   100,  300, 1000  or  2500  ppm  for 2  years.
Weakness,  ataxla,   varying  degrees  of  hind  11mb paralysis  and  calcified
masses  1n  the basal  ganglia  and  1n  the cerebellum were noted at  >300 ppm.
The  300 ppm level   [a  dose of 15 mg/kg/day,  calculated assuming a  rat food
consumption factor of  0.05 (U.S.  EPA, 1986c)]  was  considered a  LOAEL and the
100 ppm level (5 mg/kg/day)  was considered a  NOEL.  An uncertainty factor of
1000, 10  for  Interspecles extrapolation,  10  for  Intraspecles  extrapolation,
and  an  additional  uncertainty factor  to  account for  the  severity  of  the
effect  and  the  questionable quality of  the database, was used  to calculate
an RfD  of  0.005  mg/kg/day.  Confidence In  the  RfD was considered low, based
on low  to medium confidence In the study and low confidence In the data base.
    U.S.  EPA  (1967b)  cited  the  Lee  and  Peters  (1976)  80-week  study using
rats  and  Indicated that  the  dose of 6.1  mg/kg/day (female  rats)  1s  a NOEL
and  25.5  mg/kg/day 1s a  LEL resulting  In  alopecia.   The  Lee et  al.  (1978)
study,  which  reported additional  effects  1n  the study  described  by  Lee and
Peters  (1976). 1s not cited.
    In  the  80-week study  reported by  Lee and  Peters  (1976) and Lee  et  al.
(1978), groups of  24  CD  rats/sex were  fed diets  containing practical grade
thlram  that  provided  doses  of  0, 5.3,  20.4  or 52 mg/kg/day to  males,  and
6.1,  25.5 and 66.9 mg/kg/day to  females.   H1nd  limb  ataxla  or  paralysis was
observed In 8/24 high-dose female rats  (Lee and Peters,  1976).   Hlstologlcal
examinations of nervous tissue of two ataxlc  rats  revealed demyellnation and
degeneration of  the  sciatic  nerve,  and  degeneration of  the  spinal  cord (Lee
and Peters, 1976).

0133d                               -71-                             08/23/89

-------
    This  Is  In conflict  with Lee  et  al.  (1978),  who stated  that  specific
lesions of  the central and  peripheral  nervous  systems were  not  observed In
nonataxlc,  ataxlc  or  paralyzed  rats.   Additional  nervous  system  effects
noted  were  changes  In hind  leg  walking gait  In  females  treated at  >25.5
mg/kg/day, and hyperactlvlty  1n males  at  >20.4  mg/kg/day  and  females  at 66.9
mg/kg/day (five ataxlc females were also hyperactive).   Effects  reported In
Lee  et  al.   (1978)  Included  alopecia  In   middle- and   high-dose  rats  and
decreased body weight  compared with controls at  all doses In  males,  and In
middle- and high-dose  females.  Body weight, presented 1n growth  curves,  was
consistently below controls  1n low-dose males.  Statistical analyses  of body
weight data were  not presented.   Results  of organ weight  measurements showed
Increased  relative  thyroid  and   testes   weight  1n high-dose   males  and
Increased  relative  liver,   kidney, thyroid,   ovary and  brain  weights  In
high-dose females,  with  relative  spleen weights  Increased 1n both high- and
middle-dose females.   Statistical analyses  and  actual  organ weight data were
not   provided.    Hlstopathologlcal   examinations    revealed   a   dose-related
Increase In the Incidence and  severity of fatty Infiltration  of the pancreas
In male  rats,  with  1/17,  3/13.   11/15  and  14/16 control, low-,  middle- and
high-dose rats  affected.   Fatty  Infiltration  of  the  pancreas  was found  In
only  1/11  high-dose female  rats.  Squamous  metaplasia   of  the  thyroid  was
observed In 4/16  and  3/11  high-dose male and female rats compared with 1/17
male  and 0/18  female  control rats.   Based  on decreased body  weight  gain. In
low-dose males,  the 5.3 mg/kg/day  dose can  be considered an  effect  level.
Although  1t  Is   not  clear  whether decreased  body  weight   gain should  be
considered  an  adverse effect.  It  1s  an  effect  observed   consistently  In
thlram treated animals, and  the subchronlc  study  by Lowy  et  al. (1979, 1980}
0133d                               -72-                             08/23/89

-------
\n  which body  weight was  decreased  In  thlram  treated  rats  compared  with
pair-fed controls  Indicated  that  thlraro Itself contributes  to  the effect on
body weight.
    In  addition,  It  1s  known  that  thi ram  1s   an  Inhibitor  of  aldehyde
dehydrogenase, a biochemical effect  that  1s  significant  to humans  because of
the widespread  use  of  ethanol.   In the  study  by  Garcia  de Torres  et  al.
{1983),  two  gavage  doses  of  thlram  at 3.8  mg/kg  given  to female  rats
followed by an  Intraperltoneal  Injection  of ethanol  (2  g/kg)  significantly
Increased blood  acetaldehyde levels for  up  to 240  minutes  after  treatment.
The Increases  1n blood acetaldehyde were also  detectable when ethanol  was
administered 48  hours after  thlram treatment.  Although  this study Is acute,
It suggests that exposure to thlram may potentiate the action of ethanol.
    Minimal toxlclty data are available  In dogs.   U.S. EPA (1987c) mentioned
a  1-year dog study  1n  which 200  ppm (5  mg/kg/day) was considered  a NOEL.
Salto  et al.  (1980),  however,   reported  CNS signs  and  liver  lesions where
dogs  were  treated  for  2   years   with   thlram   In  gelatin  capsules  at  4
mg/kg/day.    In  addition,  there  was  a  transient  reduction In  erythrocyte
count at that dosage.  All dogs  treated  at 40 mg/kg/day  died.  There were no
effects at 0.4 mg/kg/day.
    No  single  chronic study with  thlram clearly  defines  a  NOAEL  and LOAEL
for the critical  effect  1n  the most  sensitive  species.  The NOAEL  of  0.61
mg/kg/day for  reproductive  effects  1n  the  ferret  (Hornshaw et  al.,  1987)
appears  to  be the most defensible  basis  for  the  RfD, because It Is below any
LOAEL for chronic  toxldty  In  rats and dogs.  Application  of an uncertainty
factor  of  100  (see  Section  8.2.2.1.)  results In  an RfD  for  chronic  oral
exposure  of  0.006  mg/kg/day,  the  same  as  the  RfD for   subchronlc  oral
exposure.  Confidence 1n the  RfD Is medium (see Section 8.2.2.1.).


0133d                                -73-                             08/23/89

-------
    A  significant  feature  of  the  graphs   1s  that  the  boundary  line  for
adverse effects 1s nearly without  slope  at  human  equivalent durations beyond
about 0.0025 llfespan.  This feature  Is  consistent  with  the observation that
there  1s  little difference between  the subchronlc  and  chronic  toxlclty  of
thlram, and  with  the  fact  that the  subchronlc and chronic oral RfD values
are Identical.
    No  one  species,  effect,  or study  figures prominently  In defining  the
boundary  line  for adverse  effects,  as  can  be  seen by  Identifying  the FELs
and  LOAELs  on  or  near the line.   The  LOAEL for  the major  Inflection  (at
0.0025  llfespan)  1s  for  Inhibited  metabolism 1n  rats  treated  with  thlram at
3.8 mg/kg/day  for 2 days  (Garc'la de Torres  et al.,  1983).   The  PEL located
slightly  above  the  line at 0.013  llfespan  Is for  teratogenlclty where NMRI
mice were treated at  10  mg/kg/day for  2  days,  as  reported  In  an  abstract
(Matthlaschk, 1973).  The LOAEL slightly above  the  line  at 0.022  llfespan Is
for  reduced  body weight   In  male  ferrets  fed  a  diet  that provided  2.8
mg/kg/day  for   28  days.   At  0.12 llfespan,  the  LOAEL  on  the  line  1s  for
reproduction In ferrets fed a  diet that provided 2.1  mg/kg/day for  24 weeks
(Hornshaw et al., 1987).  The LOAEL  slightly above  the line at 0.76 llfespan
Is  for reduced body  weight  In  male  rats  fed  a  diet  that provided  5.3
mg/kg/day for 80 weeks.
    The region  of contradiction Is not  unduly large and  Is restricted to the
region  between 0.0011  and  0.12   llfespan.   This  region  probably  reflects
differences In  study  quality and protocol rather  than differences In species
sensitivity.  The regions of ambiguity  are  also relatively small, reflecting
the  rather  extensive nature of the data base  as well  as  general  agreement
between studies.  The subchronlc  and chronic RfD value,  0.006 mg/kg/day  or
0.4  mg/day  for a 70  kg  human, Is  well  below the  boundary  for no  adverse
effects.
0133d                               -74-                             08/23/89

-------
                           9.   REPORTABLE  QUANTITIES
9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
    The  toxldty  of t til ram was  discussed  In  Chapter  6.  Data  suitable  for
the derivation  of an  RQ  are  summarized  In Table 9-1.   In the  study using
mink  and  ferrets  (Hornshaw  et  al.,  1987),  ferrets  appeared  to  be  more
sensitive  than  mink;  therefore,  only  data concerning ferrets  are  presented
1n  Table 9-1.   In the 28-day  study, male ferrets  treated at a  dose  of  27.5
mg/kg/day died following 11-16 days of treatment.  Death within such  a short
period  of  time  1s considered an  acute   effect  and  Is  not  scored   for  CS
determination.  Altered body  weights were observed In males at  >20 ppm  (2.8
mg/kg/day)  and  reduced erythrocyte counts  and hematocrlts were  observed  1n
both  sexes  at  >50 ppm  (5.6-8.6  mg/kg/day).  Only the effect on  body weight
1s  entered  In Table  9-1,  because  this   effect  and  the  hematologlc  effects
would  both  be  assigned an  RV   of  4.   Although  this  study  was  extremely
short  In duration, no  uncertainty factor  Is applied  to expand to  chronic
exposure because data In other species do not  show differences  In subchronlc
and chronic toxldty.  In  the  reproductive study,  no  offspring  were produced
by  ferrets  treated at 7 mg/kg/day,  and  reduced litter, and kit  weights  were
reported at 2.1 mg/kg/day.
    In  an 80-week  study  (Lee and  Peters, 1976;  Lee  et al.,   1978),  subtle
nervous  system  effects  (altered  gait)  were noted  1n female rats treated  at
>25.5  mg/kg/day,  while   body  weights   were  decreased   1n  males   at   5.3
mg/kg/day.  E.I.  Du Pont  de  Nemours & Co.  (n.d.)  reported ataxla,  hind  limb
paralysis and  calcified  masses 1n  the basal  ganglia and  cerebellum  of  rats
treated  with   thlram  In the  diet  at  doses  of 15  mg/kg/day  for  2  years.
Incidence  data were  not   provided.   Malta et al.  (1980) reported  reduced
muscle weight  and  the  presence of hlstopathologlc lesions  In  the muscles  of


0133d                               -75-                             08/23/89

-------
•r*

i
to%J





I
»t


i
s
             o
             s
             g.
             VI
             Ol
            ae
            ?**
             v>
             O "
          III
Exposure
ehicle

bystca

State
          o
          mm
          S£
                             J"r     il-     !
                             s-
                             -
                             a>
                             —
                             V
                             S
                             w
                             a
                             v
                             «
                             ac
                     ,S5
                                                      e:
                                                      oio
                                                                                   a»    r»
                                                                                   0«    o>
                                                                             <-   Or-   «*^
                                      a.
                                      e
f
01
*-
 0»
          v> e u ^
        tidinoi
t.     «^
     •« 4t »> C «. >»
                                                                                 e     e<*2^v>B45wT
                                                                                 9     — t-iaec^u-
                                                                                          «i  « « <» -5
                                                                                         v'CiDi&ue
                                                                                        is-e— 01— o
                                                                                          lvfu^^
                                                                          S
                                     e t.     c >-
                                     — o    — o
                                       «.      >k
                                     x  v>  >»   <»
                                     » «- ^  r-+iM
                                     o «. o»  o oi oi
                                                          **I
                     >»       >%      — 01     «• 01
                                               ts
                                     wo      o
                                                                                         «*
                                                                                       u«
                                               .&    S
                                      »«*     a> *•     o> ••
                                       a)     -o*    •o*
                                       ^     ts —    -o —
                                                                          oo
                                                                                       oa
                                                                                       ^ »—
                                                                                       kF-
                                                                                       >g oi
                                                                                       uu
                                                          -3o>
                                                          v
                            U
                            kft
                    £±1
                     i^s
                     ig.0
                    u. <• U
                                         ^

                                         i
                                                                                                   08/23/Q9

-------


\














w
. ^>t

P
_j
1


























to
v
B
to
u-
to
o.
i



•o* —
i s ?
*k O>
ui e .K
c ™ v.
sir
^ z —
llf

u «•- *•
to £ v
» &


a
 Ol
»!
Hi
s s
ۥ3
Sit


»
e


^
oi
JUs
(St O.
e to
O ^^
S.1" »i
)£ 5 $

u
^
'i
e
B -o
^9 ^J W*

if-

ago
w ***
o
»
o



«M .
^



MI r ^
•»«- *
to ^ *»
kk O ^
i ?3
g

** (—
!
5
V
•5
s
u



CD
to



o
>>
1 1

•* "X e e m
c S ** ^
5 »3i*'0
ti 5 1! 5.
€ SSS5

-
w
5-S
O. 5J>
!•
to to

K r—
O 3
L. ^



«M
1
O
"



a
*^»
,^
S



1
$
!
o>
M
S
U
£
V
to
u
B
1
-M
|
o

e
^
2
to »-
Z s..
1 i
L. e
1 5
u
>> o
tl
M «
o •-
* : I
• j* «

s ^ ^
•o to
i 1 1
s. - „
II*
» I i
B •• O
| S k
"a, >•  *** w
IE!

5 IT *5
^ oS -
: i j ,
to M «
•**•»•*
9V i-
j O »> O
— * « 2!
to u to
S*< w
o. . I £
. * • —

•o3 ? i1 S
0133d
-77-
08/23/89

-------
rats at 300  ppm In the diet  (15  mg/kg/day)  for  2 years.  In  a  2-year study
In  dogs  treated with  thlram In  gelatin  capsules,  40 mg/kg/day  resulted 1n
the death  of all  dogs by 29  weeks,  and 4 mg/kg/day was  associated  with CNS
effects and liver lesions.
    Short  et  al.   (1976)  reported maternal and  teratogenlc  effects  In  rats
treated by gavage  at  136 mg (practical   grade  th1ram)/kg/day on  gestation
days 6-15.   The only  effect  reported at  40 mg/kg/day  was reduced fetal  body
weight.   In  a rat  reproduction  study  (Short  et al.,  1976),  a dosage of 96
mg/kg/day  precluded  reproduction  and  30  mg/kg/day  was  associated  with
reduced number of Implants and offspring/litter.
    The derivations of CS  and RQ values are presented  In  Table 9-2.   CSs
were not  calculated, from  studies 1n  which deaths occurred  shortly  after the
study  began  (Hornshaw et al.,  1987; Short et al.,  1976).  As  Indicated In
Table  9-2,  the  highest  CS  Is  calculated from  the  ferret  study  In  which
reduced Utter  and  kit  body  weights  were  reported at a human equivalent  dose
of  0.49 mg/kg/day.  The CS  of 25.6  corresponds to an  RQ  of  100  (Table 9-3).
That reproduction  1n  ferrets  Is  the critical effect  1n the  most  sensitive
species Is supported by the  fact  that  the highest  CS was calculated for  this
effect.
    U.S.  EPA  (19875}  derived an RQ  of  100 for thlram  based  on an Inhalation
study  of   reproductive  effects  In  rats   (Davydova,  1973).    In  this  study
(summarized  by  Flshbeln.  1976), reproductive  effects  (extension  of  the
estrous cycle,  reduced  fertility,  underweight  fetuses) were  observed 1n  rats
exposed  to  thlram at  a  concentration  of 3.8±0.058  mg/m3  6 hours/day.  5
days/week  for 4.5  months.  A CS  of 35.4 was  calculated from this study based
on  an  Rv^ of 4.4  and  an RV& of 9.   Although  the  CS calculated  from the
0133d                               -78-                             08/23/89

-------













f
1
e
*
3
M
e
a,
M
«» *"
9> -*J
it
|M
ttl
1
1
u









u
s
,2
01


o
OK


v>
o

J,
oc




I



s

o —
u w >•
i!s
aji
•1 —•>
VI »•
AnlMl D
(•g/kg/d
1
to
s * i
": ?. S ! 1 I

Z 5 " -S : r
* £ <-• £ ""? ** *
JIB e *» +*
n 3 tl •*
B - 0 . * *
S £ S ~" $ •;
z _i _i »>• ie «>
§ § § § § 1

(NJ *4> 00 0* r»

^ IN! o w W e

^ r» *• on r* o
^


e -^
^ ** V*
M «P- - tft •* C
* S S S£
S ? 51 5-S
e> S v |jr-
* fe S 5 *u
S S 5 S Jt«
* 3 5 ^ iff
o a o
A VI V • • £ >.
B V v> +* *t
•O C7> «n vi -o i« ^
* • * v S e> •-
u vi « e u e <•
Jl- .M 9 *• •*
Vt u m •emu
5 £ Ji £22


«M ^  z 
O o o o e

^ v£ ^

«0 01 

r- 01 co CD «o


—
f -. ?
B JBE §1 <** ••
S ' > f If I V5
^* •• e •» a *•
8*. A e *• •*
« «.r F- *-o °'
> •- u ia up u v
»- t» — «• «2 oei
f- x «| — J3 B
we iu f •*• § —
• • •- «* •- ^ S u.
M c 'O r- ^ e &
D> 0>n-
V. «« U «l UW WO
<9 « 1. 33 S
g fc** ° '9'* ^>'w
u 1-8 a at L. £ %


eg ^ r-' « ^


«
«
I 2 5 S S

* ^ o ^ o
rt * «
0)
2 ' * 5







e
1
s
A
f»
e
J
|
ib
e
S
1

B
a
•M
1
•>
e
en
M
e
£
«
£
I
—
i


e
*
0133d
-79-
08/23/89

-------
                                   TABLE  9-3
                                    Thlram
           Minimum Effective  Dose  (MED) and Reportable  Quantity  {RQ)
Route:
Dose*:
Effect:
Reference:
RVd:
RVe:
Composite Score:
RQ:
oral
34.3 rag/day
reproductive; reduced litter size and reduced
litter and kit body weights
Hornshaw et a!., 1987
3.2
8
25.6
100
'Equivalent human dose
0133d                               -80-                             08/24/89

-------
Davydova (1973) study  U  larger  than the CS calculated from  the  Hornshaw  et
al.  (1987)  study, the  Hornshaw  et  al.  (1967)  study  1s  a more  appropriate
basis  for  the RQ  because  only limited  Information  concerning the  Davydova
(1973) study was available In the review by  Flshbeln  (1976).
9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGEN!CITY
    Thlram  has  tested  negative  In  a  limited  oral  study  using  mice  (BRL,
1968a)  and  In  oral  carclnogenldty  studies  using  rats  (Lee  et  al.,  1978;
Takahashl et  al.,  1983).   Lljlnsky (1984)  found that oral  treatment  of rats
with  thlram did not result  In a  carcinogenic  effect,  while treatment with
thlram and  nitrite In  the diet  Increased  the Incidence of nasal  cavity and
forestomach tumors.  Data  regarding the carclnogenldty of thlram to  humans
were not located.
    Based on  the  negative  animal  data and the  lack of  human  carclnogenldty
data, thlram  can be classified in  EPA group  D - not classifiable  as  to human
carclnogenldty.   EPA  group  D compounds  cannot be given  a hazard  ranking;
therefore, an RQ based  on carclnogenldty cannot be assigned.
0133d
-81-
08/23/89

-------
                                10.   REFERENCES

ACGIH  (American  Conference  of Governmental  Industrial Hyglenlsts).   1986.
Documentation of the Threshold  Limit  Values  and  Biological  Exposure Indices,
5th ed.  Cincinnati, OH.  p. 573.1-573.3.

ACGIH  (American  Conference  of Governmental  Industrial Hyglenlsts}.   1987.
Threshold  Limit  Values  and  Biological  Exposure  Indices  for  1987-1988.
Cincinnati, OH.  p. 34.

Atkinson,  R.   1985.   Kinetics and mechanisms  of the gas-phase  reactions  of
the  hydroxyl   radical  with  organic  compunds  under  atmospheric  conditions.
Chem. Rev.  86: 71.

Atkinson,  R.   1987.  A structure-activity  relationship  for  the estimation  of
rate  constants  for  the gas-phase reactions  OH radicals  with  organic  com-
pounds.  Int. 3.  Chem.  K1net.  19: 799-828.

Bluzat,  R.  and J.  Seuge.   1983.   Effects  of poisoning by  thlram  present  In
the environment or  food of the crustacean Gammarus  pulex.   Environ.  Pollut.
Ser. A. Ecol. Blol.  31(2): 133-148.

Bluzat,  R.,  0. Jonot  and  J.  Seuge.   1981.   Acute  toxclty of  a  fungicide,
thlram  (dlthlocarbamate),  to  the  freshwater  mollusk  Lymnaea  stagnalls.
Colloq.  - Inst.  Natl.  Sante  Rech.   Med.;  Tests  Toxic  A1gue H1l1eu  Aquat.
106: 377-386.
0133d
-82-
08/24/89

-------
Bluzat,  R.,  0.  Jonot  and  J.  Seuge.  1982a.   Acute toxUHy  of thlram  In
gammarus-pulex  effect   of  a   1-hour  contamination  and  degradation  of  an
aqueous suspension.  Bull. Environ. Contain.  Toxlcol.   29(2):  248-252.

Bluzat,  R.,  0.  Jonot and  J.  Seuge.   1982b.  Acute toxlclty of  a fungicide,
thlram  (dlthlocarbamate)  In   the  freshwater  amphlpod  crustacean  Gammarus
pulex.  Environ. Pollut. Ser.  A Ecol. Blol.   29(3): 225-233.

BRL  (Blonetlcs  Research Labs).  1968a.  Evaluation of  Carcinogenic,  Terato-
genlc, and MutagenU Activities of Selected  Pesticides  and  Industrial  Chemi-
cals.  Volume  I.  Carcinogenic  Study.   Prepared  for  National  Cancer  Insti-
tute.  NTIS PB-223159.   p. 2-7, 28, 83,  328, 329.

BRL  (Blonetlcs  Research Labs).  1968b.  Evaluation of  Carcinogenic,  lerato-
genlc, and Mutagenlc Activities of Selected  Pesticides  and  Industrial  Chemi-
cals.  Volume II.  Teratogenlc  Study  In Mice  and Rats.   Prepared  for  National
Cancer Institute.  NTIS PB-223 160.  p.  1-13, 22,  49,  50,  73.

Cherpak,   V.V.,  B.Bezugly  and  L.M. Kaskevlch.  1971.   Sanitary  and  hygenlc
characteristics  of working conditions  and   the  state  of  health 1n  persons
working   with   tetramethylthlram  dlsulflde   (TMTD).    Vrach.   Delo.    10:
136-139.   (English Abst).

Chlnn, S.H.F.   1973.   Effect  of  eight  fungicides   on mlcroblal activities  In
soil as measured by bloassay method.   Can.  J. M1crob1ol.  19: 771-777.
0133d
-83-
08/24/89

-------
Crockett,  P.M.,  B. K1l1an,  K.S. Crump  and R.B.  Howe.   1985.   Descriptive
Methods  for  Using  Data from Dissimilar  Experiments  to Locate a  No-Adverse-
Toxic-Effects Region 1n the Dose-Duration Plane.   Prepared  by  K.S.  Crump and
Company,  Inc.,  under   Contract  No.  6807-007  for  the  Environmental  Criteria
and Assessment Office,  U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, OH.

Dalvl, R.R.  and  D.P. Deoras.   1986.  Metabolism of a  dlthlocarbamate  fungi-
cide thlram  to carbon  dlsulflde  In  the  rat  and  Its hepatotoxlc Implications.
Acta Pharmacol. Toxlcol. (Copenh).  58{1):  38-42.

Davydova,  T.B.   1973.   The effect of tetramethyl  thluram dlsulflde  (thlram)
Inhaled on the estrous  cycle and  the  reproductive  function  of  animals.   G1g.
SanH.  38: 108-110.  (Cited In Flshbeln, 1976)

D1ehn,  B. and  G.   Tollln.  1967.   Phototaxls  In  Euglena.   IV.  Effect  of
Inhibitors of  oxldatlve and photophosphorylatlon  on the rate  of  phototaxis.
Arch. Blochem. Blophys.  121(1): 169-177.

D1ve,  D., H.  Leclerc   and  G.   Persoone.   1980.    Pesticide  toxlclty on  the
dilate protozoan  Colp1d1um campy1am: Possible consequences  of the  effect  of
pesticides  In  the   aquatic  environment.  Ecotoxlcol.  Environ.  Saf.   42(2):
129-133.

Dive,  D., M.N.  Fourmaux,  P.  Vasseur,  M.   Pussard,  R. Pons and  B. Harals.
1984,   Thlram  toxlclty to non-target organisms  - A  comparative-study  with
protozoan  and  mammalian-cells.   Environ. Pollut.  Ser. A-Ecol. B1ol.   36(2):
121-131.
0133d
-84-
08/24/89

-------
Conner,  H.,  K.  Husgafvel-Purlalnen,   D.   Jenssen  and  A.   Rannug.    1983.
Hutagenlclty of rubber additives  and  curing fumes.  Scand. J. Work  Environ.
Health.  9(2):  27-37.

Dulout, F.N., O.A. OHvero and M.C. PastoM.   1982.  The  mutagenlc  effect  of
thlram  analysed by  the  mlcronucleus  test  and the anaphast-telophase  test.
Hutat. Res.  105(6):  409-412.

Durkln,  P.  and W. Meylan.   1988.  Users'  Guide  for  D2PLOT:  A  Program  for
Dose/Duration Graphs.  Prepared  by the Chemical Hazard Assessment  Division,
Syracuse Research Corporation under Contract No. 68-C8-0004 for  the  Environ-
mental Criteria and Assessment Office,  U.S.  EPA, Cincinnati, OH.

Egberts, 3.,  H.3.M.  Beljer  and  F.D.  Roos.   1972.  The toxlclty of TH1D  1n
Japanese quail, an experimental  study.   TNO-Nleuws.  27(10): 594-598.

E.I.  Du  Pont  de Nemours  & Co.,  Inc.  n.d.   Doc. No. 004550.   Available from
EPA.  Write to  FOI, EPA,  Washington, DC 20460.   (Cited  In  U.S.  EPA,  1987c)

E1senre1ch,  S.J.,  B.B.  Looney  and J.D.  Thornton.  1981.  Airborne  organic
contaminants of the  Great Lakes  ecosystem.  Environ.  Sc1. Techno!.   15(1):
30-38.

Elespuru,  R.K.  and   W.   LlJInsky.   1973.   The   formation  of  carcinogenic
nltroso  compounds  from  nitrite   and  some  types  of agricultural  chemicals.
Food Cosmet. Toxlcol.  11: 807-817.  (Cited  In  IARC, 1976)
0133d
-85-
08/24/89

-------
Fenyvesl, G.,  M.  Botos and  J.  Ivan.   1985.   Pesticide-drug Interaction  In
rats.  Arch. Toxlcol.   8:  269-271.

Flshbeln, L.  1976.  Environmental health aspects of  fungicides.   I.  DHhlo-
carbamates.   3. Toxlcol.  Environ.  Health.   1(15):  713-735.

Frank,  R.,  H.E. Braun  and B.C.  Rlpley.   1987.   Resdlues  of  Insecticides,
fungicides  and  herbicides  In fruit  produced  In Ontario, Canada,  1980-1984.
Bull. Environ. Contain.  Toxlcol.   39:  272-279.

Frear, O.E.H. and 3.E. Boyd.  1967.  Use of Daphnla  for  the mlcrobloassay  of
pesticides.    I.  Development  of standardized  techniques  for rearing  Daphnla
and preparation.  J. Econ.  Entomol.   60(5):  1228-1236.

Galnes,   T.B.    1969.    Acute  toxldty   of   pesticides.   Toxlcol.   Appl.
Pharmacol.  14: 515-534.

Gangawane,  L.V. and L.  Kulkarnl.   1979.  Tolerance of certain  fungicides  by
nitrogen  fixing blue-green  algae  and their side  effects on rice  cultlvers.
Pesticides.   13(5): 37-38.

Garcia de Torres,  G.,  K.G.  Romer,  0. Torres Alanls and  K.3. Freundt.   1983.
Blood  acetaldehyde leve-ls  In  alcohol-dosed   rats  after  treatment.    Drug.
Chem. Toxlcol.  6(4):  317-328.
Goodyear T1re  & Rubber Co.  1979.   Mutagenlclty  Evaluation of Methyl  Tuads
(TMTD-Bayer).   U.S.  EPA/OPTS Public Files  (8d submission).  Microfiche  No.
OTS0513096.
0133d
-86-
08/24/89

-------
Goodyear  Tire  &  Rubber  Co.   1980s.    Mutagenlclty  of  methyl   tuads  1n
mammalian cells.   (Laboratory Report No. 79-52)  U.S.  EPA/OPTS  Public  Files
(8d submission).  Microfiche No. OTS0513104.

Goodyear  Tire  &  Rubber  Co.   1980b.   Evaluation of  methyl tuads  (peroxide
process)  with  Drosophlla  melanoqaster.   U.S.  EPA/OPTS   Public  Files  (8d
submission).  Microfiche No. OTS0513102.

Goodyear  T1re  &  Rubber  Co.   1981.  Mutagenlclty  of  evaluation  of  methyl
tuads  lot  4-26-B  In  the  DNA repair  test.   Final  report.   U.S.  EPA/OPTS
Public Files (8d submission).   Microfiche No. OTS0513107.

Goodyear  Tire  & Rubber Co.   1982.   Evaluation of  8048-69-1 1n  the  Ui  vitro
transformation of  BALB/3T3  cells  assay.   Submitted  by Litton  Blonetlcs, Inc.
U.S. EPA/OPTS Public Files  (8d submission).  Microfiche No. OTS0513109.

Gore, R.C.,  R.H.  Hannah,  S.C. Pattaclnl and  T.J. Porro.   1971.   Infared and
ultraviolet  spectra  of seventy-six  pesticides.   J. Assoc. Off. Anal.  Chem.
54: 1040-1082.

Griffith,  R.L.  and S.  Matthews.   1969.   Persistence  In  soil of  the  fungl-
ddal seed dressings captan and thlram.   Ann. Appl.  B1ol.   64:  113-118.

Grollere, C.A.  arid J.  Dupy-Blanc.  1985.  Action of  thlram on  the cortex of
Tetrahymena  pyrlformls  during the  stomatogenesls.   ProtlstologUal.   21(4):
525-540.
0133d                               -87-                             08/24/89

-------
Gruen, G., H. Sadek and P. Clausing.  1982.  Evaluation of acute toxUHy of
plant protection agents 1n birds In relation to possible side effects 1n the
field.  NachrUhtenbl.  Pflanzenschutz  Index  DDR.   36{6): 127-130.

Hadhazy, A.  and  R.  Glavlts.   1982.   Tox1colog1cal  study  of  seed disinfect-
ants  1n ylldHfe  animals.    Magy.  Allatorv.  Lapja.   37(6):  399-402.   [CA
97{15):121668K]

Hartley, D.  and  H.  Kldd,  Ed.   1983.  The Agrochemlcals Handbook.  The Royal
Society of Chemistry,  Nottingham,  England.

Hawley,  G.G.   1981.    The  Condensed  Chemical  Dictionary,   10th  ed.   Van
Nostrand Relnhold Co.,  New York.   p. 1020-1021.

Heath,  R.G.,  O.W.  Spann,  E.F.  Hill and J.F.  KreUzer.   1972.   Comparative
dietary  tox1c1t1es  of  pesticides  to  birds.   U.S.  F1sh H1ldl.  Serv.  Spec.
Scl. Rep. Wlldl.  152:  57.

Hedenstedl.  A.,  U.  Rannug, C.  Ramel and C.A. Wachtmelster.  1979.   Mutagen-
Iclty  and  metabolism  studies  on  12  thluram  and dlthlocarbamate  compounds
used  as  accelerators  1n  the  Swedish  rubber Industry.  Mutat.  Res.   68(4):
313-325.

Helling, C.S., O.G. Dennlson and D.D. Kaufman.   1974.  Fungicide movement In
soils.  Phytopathology. 64:  1091-1100.
0133d                               -88-                             08/24/89

-------
Hornshaw, T.C.,  R.J.  Aulerlch and  R.K.  Ringer.  1987.   ToxIcHy of  thlram
(tetramelhylthluram dlsulflde) to mink and European ferrets.   Bull.  Environ.
Contain. Toxlcol.  38(4):  618-626.

HSDB (Hazardous Substance Data Base).  1988.  Record #863.  On-line: May  16,
1988.

Hutber, G.N., L.J. Rogers and A.J.  Smith.  1979.  Influence of  pesticides on
the growth of cyanobacteMa.  Z.  Allg.  H1krob1ol.  19(6):  397-402.

1ARC (International Agency  for  Research  on Cancer).  1976.   IARC  Monographs
on  the  Evaluation of  the  Carcinogenic Risk of  Chemicals to Humans.   IARC,
WHO, Lyons,  France.  Vol. 12,  p.  225-236.

Ingham, E.R.  1985.  Review of the  effects of 12  selected blocldes on  target
and non-target soil organisms.  Crop. Prot.   4(1): 3-32.

Jouany,  3.M.,  R.  Truhaut,  P.   Vasseur,   0.   Klein,   J.F.   Ferard  and  P.
Deschamps.   1985.   An  example of  Interaction  between environmental pollut-
ants: Modification of  thlram  toxUUy  to freshwater organisms  by  nitrites or
nitrates  In  relation  to nltrosamlne  synthesis.  Ecotoxlcol.  Environ. Saf.
9(3): 327-338.

Kawasaki, M.   1980.   Experiences  with the  test  scheme  under  the  Chemical
Control  Law  of  Japan:   An  approach  to   structure-activity  correlations.
Ecotoxlcol.  Environ. Saf.  4:  444-454.
0133d                               -89-                             08/24/89

-------
Kaskevlch, L.M. and V.P. Bezugly.  1973.  Clinical aspects of chronic  thlram
poisoning.  Vrach. Delo.  6:  128-130.   (English Abst.).

Kluge, E.   1969a.   Effect  of the  soil  reaction on decompostlon and persis-
tency  of  thluram,  ferbam  and  captan  In  the  soil.   Arch.   Pflanzenschutz.
5(4): 263-271.  (CA 73:24214)

Kluge, E.   1969b.   Duration  of the effect  of thluram,  ferbam and captan  In
forest soils.  Arch. Pflanzenshutz.   5:  39-53.   (CA 71:69579d)

Kn1e, J., A.  Haelke,  I. Juhnke and W.  Schiller.   1983.  Results of studies
of  chemical  substances using  four  blotests.   Dtsch.  Gewaesserkd.  Mitt.
27(3): 77-79.

Kr1shnakumar1, U.K.   1977.   Sensitivity  of the alga  Scenedesmus  acutus  to
some pesticides.   Life Scl.   20(9):  1525-1532.

Kruls-de Vrles, M.H., P.J.  Cuenraads and  J.P  Nater.  1987.  Allergic contact
dermatitis  due  to  rubber  chemicals   1n  haemodlalysls  equipment.   Contact
Dermatitis.   17(5):  303-305.

Lee,  C.C. and  P.J.  Peters,   1976.  Neurotoxldty  and  behavioral effects  of
thlram In rats.  Environ.  Health Perspect.  17:  35-43.

Lee,  C.C.,  J.Q.   Russell  and  J.L.  Minor.   1978.   Oral  toxlclty  of  ferric
dlmethyldKhlocarbomate {Ferbam)  and  tetramethylthluram  dlsulMde   (Thlram)
In rodents.   0. Toxlcol. Environ.  Health.   4(1): 93-106.

0133d                               -90-                             08/24/89

-------
L1J1nsky, H.   1984,  Induction  of tumors  of  the  nasal  cavity  1n  rats  by
concurrent  feeding  of  thlram  and  sodium  nitrite.   J.  Toxlcol.   Environ.
Health.  13(4-6): 609-614.

Lorgue,  G.  and D.  Soyez.   1976.  Study  of  the toxic effects  of thlram, a
dlthlocarbamate  fungicide,  on  partridges.  Part  II.   Bull.  Soc.  Sd.  Vet.
Med. Comp. Lyon.  78(5): 279-288.

Lorgue,  G.t  P. Oelatour, D.  Courtot,  J.  Gastellu  and  M. Mackowlak.  1975.
Toxic  effects  of  thlram,  a dlthlocarbamate  fungicide, on quail.  Rev.  Med.
Vet.  126(3): 365-381.

Lowy,  R.,  G.  Grlffaton,  L.  Brlgant, B.  Ardouln  and F.  Dupuy.   1979.  The
dietary  no-effect level of a  dHhlocarbamate fungicide, thlram,  as evaluated
from  the measurement  data  on  rats.   II. The  various  sensitivities of the
various parameters.   Toxicology.  14(1):  39-53.

Lowy, R., G. Grlffaton, F. Dupuy,  B. Ardouln and  P.  Hanchon.  1980.   Dietary
no-effect  level  of  a  dUhlocarbamate   fungicide,  thlram,  evaluated  from
measurement  data on  rats.    I. Choice  of  the  model  of  the dose-response
relationship.  3. Toxlcol.  Environ. Health.  6(2):  403-419.

Lyman,  W.J.    1982.    Adsorption coefficient  for  soils and  sediments.  In:
Handbook of Chemical  Property Estimation  Methods, W.J. Lyman, W.F. Reehl and
D.H. Rosenblatt, Ed.  McGraw Hill Book  Co., New York.   p.  4-1  to  4-33.
0133d
-91-
08/24/89

-------
Lyman, W.J.,  W.F.  Reehl  and  D.H. Rosenblatt.   1982.   Handbook of  Chemical
Propterty Estimation Methods.   Environmental  Behavior of  Organic  Compounds.
McGraw-Hill  Book Co., New York, NY.   p.  5-10 to 5-11.

Malta, K.,  1.  Salto, K.  Takahashl,  S.  Tsuda  and Y.  Shlrasu.   1980.   Twenty
four month  chronic  toxlclty study with  bls(dlmethylthlocarbamoyl)  dlsulflde
(thlram) 1n rats.  J. Toxlcol.  Sc1.   5(3): 269-270.

Mantel,  N.   and  M.A.   Schnelderman.   1975.   Estimating  "safe"  levels,  a
hazardous undertaking.   Cancer  Res.   35:  1379-1386.

Marks,  J.G.  and  M.A.  Ralney.   1984.    Cutaneous  reactions  to  surgical
preparations and dressings.  Contact Dermatitis.   10(1):  1-5.

Matthlaschk,  G.  1973.   Influence  of  L-cyste1ne  on thlram  (TMlD)-lnduced
teratogenesls In NMRI-m1ce.  Arch. Toxlkol.  30(3):  251-262.   (CA 79:1002v)

McKee,  J.E.  and  H.W.  Wolf.   1963.   Hater Quality  Criteria,  2nd  ed.   Res.
Agency of California State Water Quality Control  Board, Publ.  No. 3-A.

Melster,  R.T.,  Ed.   1988.   Farm Chemicals Handbook  87.   Melster  Publishing
Co., Wllloughby, OH.

Merlevede,  E.   and  3.   Peters.   1965.   Metabolism  of xanthates  In  man  and
guinea  pig.   Arch.  Beiges  Med. Soc.   23:  523-551.   (Cited  1n   Oalvl  and
Deoras. 1986)
0133d                               -92-                             08/24/89

-------
MoMya, M., K. Kato,  Y.  Shlrasu and T. Kada.  1978.  MutagenlcHy screening
of  pesticides  1n  mlcroblal  systems.   4.  HutagenUlty  of dlmethyldlthlo-
carbamates and related fungicides.   Mulat.  Res.   54:  221.

Morlya, H.,  T.  Ohta,  K.  Watanabe, T.  Hlyazawa,  K.  Kato and  Y.  Shlrasu.
1983.   Further mutagenlclty  studies   on  pesticides  In  bacterial  reversion
assay systems.  Mutat. Res.  116:  185-216.

Munnecke,   D.E  and  K.Y.  Mckall.   1967.   Thlram persistence  In  soil  and
control of damplng-off caused by pythlum ultlmum.   Phytopath.  57: 969-971.

OSHA  (Occupational  Safety and  Health  Administration).   1985.   Occupational
Standards  Permissible Exposure Limits.   29  CFR 1910.1000.

Paschln,  Y.V.  and l.M.  Bakhltova.   1985.   Mutagenlc  effects  of  thlram  In
mammalian somatic cells.  Food Chem. Toxlcol.   23(3): 373-375.

Poltou, P.,  B.  Harlgnac  and  D.  Gradlskl.   1978.  Effect  of  tetramethyl-
thluram monosulflde and  dlsulflde on the central nervous  system.  Comparison
with dlsulflram.   J.  Pharmacol.  9(1):  35-44.

Prasad, M.H.,  K.  Pushpavathl,  P.  RHa  and P.P. Reddy.  1987.  The effect  of
thlram on the germ cells of male mice.   Food Chem.  Toxlcol.  25(9): 709-711.

Rajagopal,  B.S.,  G.P.   Brahmaprakash,   B.R.  Reddy,   V.D.  Singh  and   N.
Sethunathan.   1984.   Effect  and persistence of selected carbamate pesticides
In soil.  Res. Rev.  93: 31-39.

0133d                               -93-                             08/24/89

-------
Rannug, A. and  U.  Rannug.   1984.   Enzyme Inhibition as a  possible  mechanism
of  the  mutagenldty  of   dlthlocarbamlc  acid   derivatives   1n  Salmonella
typhlmurlum.   Chem. 81ol.  Interact.   49(3):  329-340.

Relnbold, K.A.,  J.J.  Hassett,  J.C.  Means and  H.L.  Banwart.   1979.   Adsorp-
tion  of  energy-related organic  pollutants:  A  literature  review.   Environ.
Res. Lab. U.S. EPA, Athens, GA.   NTIS PB 80-105117.

Richardson,  L.T.  1954.  The persistence of thlram 1n  soil  and Us  relation-
ship  to  the  microbiological balance and damplng-off  control.   Can.  J. Bot.
32: 335-346.

Roark, J.H.  and J.L.  Dale.  1979.   The effect  of turf fungicides  on  earth-
worms.  Proc. Arkansas Acad. Scl.   33:  71-74.

Robens,  J.F.   1969.   Teratologlc   studies  of  carbaryl,   dlazlnon,  norea,
dlsulflram   and   thlram   1n  small   laboratory   animals.    Toxlcol.   Appl.
Pharmacol.  15(1): 152-163.

Rocchl, P.,  P.  Perocco, H.  Albergh1n1, A.  F1n1 and G. Prodi.   1980.   Effect
of  pesticides  on scheduled and unscheduled DNA  synthesis  of  rat thymocytes
and human lymphocytes.  Arch. Toxlcol.   45(2):  101-108.

Roll,  R.   1971.  Teratologk studies  with  thlram (TMTD)  on two strains of
mice.  Arch.  Toxlkol.   27(3): 173-86.  (Taken  from TOXBIB/71/206703)
0133d                               -94-                             08/24/89

-------
SaHo, T., K.W. Takahashl,  S.  Tsuda,  K.  MHsumorl. K. HaHa and Y. Shlrasu.
1980.   Twenty-four  month  chronic   toxlclty   study   with   b1s(d1methylth1o-
carbamoyl) dlsulflde (thlram)  1n beagles.   3.  Toxlcol.  Sc1.   5(3):  269-270.

SANSS (Structure and  Nomenclature Search System).  1987.   Chemical Informa-
tion System (CIS)  computer data base.   On-Hne:  Hay 13,  1988.

Sasaki,  S.  1978.   The  scientific aspects  of  the  Chemical  Substance Control
Law   In   Japan.    In:   Aquatic   Pollutants:   Transformation and   Biological
Effects,  0.  Hutzlnger,  L.H.   Letyoeld and  B.C.J. Zoeteman,  Ed.   Pergamon
Press, Oxford,   p.  283-298.

Schafer,  E.W.,  Jr.  and  W.A.  Bowles, Jr.   1985.   Acute  oral  toxlclty and
repellency of 933  chemicals to house and deer  mice.   Arch. Environ. Contain.
Toxlcol.  14(1): 111-129.

Schneider,  B.A.   1979.    Toxicology  handbook  mammalian and  aquatic   data.
Book  1. Toxicology data.   Office of Pesticide  Programs, U.S. Environ.  Prot.
Agency, Washington, DC.  EPA-540-9-79-003A.   NTIS PB80-196876.

Sen,  N.P., B.A.  Donaldson and C. Charbonneau.  1974.   Formation of nltroso-
dlmethylamlne from the Interaction of certain  pesticides and nitrites.   In:
N-Nltroso  Compounds In  the Environment, P.  Bogovskl  and  E.A.  Walker,  Ed.
IARC, Lyons, France.  IARC Sc1. Publ. No. 9, p. 75-79.  (Cited  1n  IARC,  1976)

Seuge,  J.  and  R.  Bluzat.  1983.  Acute  toxlclty  of  a dlthlocarbamate  fungi-
cide,  thlram,  In  larvae  of the  mayfly  Cloeon dlpterum: Effects  of various
parameters.  Hydroblologla.  101(3): 215-222.    (Fre.)
0133d                               -95-                             08/24/89

-------
Seuge, 3.,  D.  Marchal-Segault  and R.  Bluzat.   1983.   Acute toxUHy of  the
dlthlocarbamate  fungicide  thlram  to  freshwater  animals.   Environ.  Pollut.
Ser. A.  31(3): 177-189.   (Fre.)

Shlrkot,   C.K.   and   K.6.   Gupta.   1985.   Accelerated   tetramethylthluram
dlsulflde  (TMTO)  degradation  In  son  by  Inoculation  with TMTD-utlllzIng
bacteria.  Bull. Environ.  Contam.  Toxlcol.   35:  354-361.

Short, R.D.,   J.Q.  Russel,  J.L.  Minor  and C.  Lee.   1976.   Developmental
toxldty   of ferric  dlmethyldUhlocarbamate  and  b1s(d1methylth1ocarbamoyl)-
dlsulflde In rats and mice.  Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.   35:  83-94.

Slvltskaya,  I.I.   1974.  State of the organ of vision  In persons working  In
contact with TMTO.  Oftalmon. Z.   28:  286-388.   (Cited  1n Flshbeln,  1976)

SRI  (Stanford  Research   Institute).    1987.    1987  Directory  of   Chemical
Producers:  United States  of America.   SRI  International,  Henlo  Park,  CA.
p. 047.

Szymezyk, T.   1981.  Mutagenlclty of the fungicide thlram.   Mutat.  Res.   85:
223-224.

Takahashl,  M.,  T.  Kokubo,  F. Furakawa  et  al.   1983.   Inhibition of  sponta-
neous  leukemia  In  F-344  rats   by  tetramethylthluram  dlsulflde   (thlram).
Gann.  75(6):  821-813.
0133d
-96-
08/24/89

-------
Taylor, G.T.  and M.t.  Pace.   1987.   Validity  of  eukaryote  Inhibitors for
assessing production and grazing mortality of marine bacteMoplankon.   Appl.
Environ. Mlcroblol.   53(1):  119-128.

Thomas, R.6.   1982.  Volatilization  from water.   I_n:  Handbook  of Chemical
Property Estimation Methods, W.J. Lyman, W.F. Reehl and D.H. Rosenblatt, Ed.
McGraw Hill Book Co., New York.   p.  15-1  to 15-34.

Thuranszky, K.,  I.  Kiss,  M.  Botos  and A. Szebenl.  1982.  Effect of dHhlo-
carbamate-type chemicals on the  nervous  system  of rats.  Arch. ToxUol.  5:
135-138.

Tooby,  I.E.,  P.A.  Hursey and J.S.  Alabaster.   1975.   The acute toxlclty of
102  pesticides  and miscellaneous  substances  to  fish.    Chem.   Ind.   12:
523-526.

Tucker, R.K.  and D.G.  Crabtree.   1970.   Handbooks of loxldty of Pesticides
to Wildlife.   U.S.  Fish  and Wildlife  Service,  Bureau of Sport ElsheMer and
Wildlife, Resource Publ.  No. 84.   p.  1-9, 114-115.

Upshall,  A.   and P.E.  Johnson.   1981.    Thlram-lnduced  abnormal  chromosome
segregation In Asperglllus nldulans.   Hutat.  Res.   89(4):  279-301.

U.S.  EPA.   1980.   Guidelines  and  Methodology  Used  In the  Preparation of
Health  Effect  Assessment   Chapters  of  the  Consent  Decree  Water  Criteria
Documents.  Federal Register.   45(231):  79347-79357,
0133d
-97-
08/24/89

-------
U.S.  EPA.   1984a.   Guidance for  the  Rereglstratlon  of Pesticide  Products
Containing Thlram  as the Active  Ingredient.   Office of  Pesticide  Programs,
Washington, DC.  NTIS PB85-102705.

U.S. EPA.  1984b.  Methodology and Guidelines  for  Ranking Chemicals  Based on
Chronic ToxIcHy  Data.   Prepared by  the  Office of Health  and  Environmental
Assessment. Environmental Criteria and  Assessment  Office, Cincinnati,  OH for
the Office of Emergency and Remedial  Response, Washington, DC.

U.S. EPA.  1986a.  Thlram: tolerance  levels.  40 CFR 1880.138.

U.S.  EPA.   1986b.   Guidelines   for  Carcinogen   Risk  Assessment.    Federal
Register.  51(185): 33992-34003.

U.S.  EPA.   1986c.   Reference Values  for Risk  Assessment.   Prepared  by  the
Office  of  Health  and  Environmental   Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria  and
Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH for the Office  of Solid Waste,  Washington,
DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1987a.  Graphical  Exposure  Modeling  System  (GEMS).   Personal
Computer  Version.   Fate  of  Atmospheric  Pollutants (FAP)  computer  program.
April 1987.  U.S.  EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.

U.S. EPA.  1987b.  Reportable Quantity  Document  for Thlram.  Prepared  by the
Office  of  Health  and  Environmental   Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria  and
Assessment Office,  Cincinnati,  OH for  the  Office of Emergency and  Remedial
Response, Washington, DC.
0133d
-98-
08/24/89

-------
U.S. EPA.  1987c.  Integrated Risk  Information  System (IRIS):  Reference Dose
(RfD)  for  Oral  Exposure  for Thlram.   Online.   (Revised;  Verification  date
04/15/87.)   Office of  Health  and  Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental
Criteria and Assessment Office,  Cincinnati, OH.

U.S.   EPA.    1987d.    Superfund   Record   of  Decision   (EPA  Region   5):
Johns-Hanvllle-Waukegan Site,  Illinois  (First  Remedial  Action),  June  1987.
Final Draft Report No.  EPA/ROD/R05-87/048.

U.S. EPA.   1988.   Integrated Risk  Information  System  (IRIS).   Chemical  File
for  Thlram.   Online.    Office   of  Health   and   Environmental  Assessment,
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati,  OH.

U.S. EPA/OWRS  (Environmental Protection  Agency/Office of  Water  Regulations
and  Standards.    1986.    Guidelines  for  Deriving Numerical  National  Water
Quality  Criteria  for  the Protection  of  Aquatic   Organisms  and Their  Uses.
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,  DC.  106 p.

USITC  (U.S.  International  Irade  Commission).   1987.    Synthetic  Organic
Chemicals,  United States  Production  and Sales,  1986.    USTIC Publ.  2009,
Washington, DC.

Van  Leeuwen,  C.J.,  J.L.   Maas-Dlepeveen,  G. Nlebeek,  W.H.A.   Vergouw,  P.S.
Grlffloen and M.H. Luljen.   1985a.   Aquatic  toxlcologlcal  aspects  of dlthlo-
carbamates  and  related  compounds.   I.  Short-term  toxlclty  tests.   Aquat.
Toxlcol.  7(3): 145-164.
0133d
-99-
08/24/89

-------
Van Leeuwen, C.J., F. Roberts and G. Nlebeek.  1985b.  Aquatic  lexicological
aspects of dUhlocarbamates and related compounds.  II. Effects on survival,
reproduction and growth of Daphnla magna.   Aquat.  Toxlcol.  7(3): 165-175.

Van  Leeuwen,  C.J.,  J.L.  Maasdlepeveen and  H.C.M. Overbeek.   1986a.   Sub-
lethal  effects  of  tetramethylthluram  dlsulflde  (thlram)  1n rainbow-trout.
Aqua. Toxlcol.   9(1): 13-19.

Van Leeuwen, C.J.,  A.  Espeldoorn and F.  Mol.  1986b.   Aquatic  toxlcologlcal
aspects of dUhlocarbamates and related compounds: III. Embryolarval studies
with rainbow trout.  Aquat.  Toxlcol.  9(2-3):  129-146.

Van  Leeuwen  C.3.,  T.  Helder  and  W. Selnen.   1986c.   Aquatic  toxlcologlcal
aspects of  dUhlorcarbamates  and  related  compounds:  IV.  Teratogenlclty and
hlstopathology  1n rainbow trout.  Aquat. Toxlcol.   9(2-3): 147-160.

Vasseur, P., 3.M.  Jouany  and  J.F.  Ferard.   1982.   Determination of A1P as a
criterion for acute  ecotoxlclty 1n  algae.   Colloq. Inst.  Natl.  Sante.  Rech.
Hed.  106: 207-226.

Voronkln, A.S.  and  Y.T.  Loshakov.   1973.   Toxic effect  of  pesticides  on
Tublfex tublfex.  Eksp. Vodn.  Tokslkol.  5:  169-178.   [CA 86(19):134541m]

Hendel, K.G.   1974.   Influence of  pesticides  on  rhlzopshere organisms.  I.
Study of TMTO  (tetramethylthluram dlsulflde)  In  soils using  a model experi-
ment.   Zentralbl.   Bakterlol.   ParasHenk,   Infertlon.  Hyg.,   Abt.l:0r1g.,
Relhe. A.  228:141-153.  (CA  81:115754)

0133d                               -100-                            08/24/89

-------
Williams,  P.P.   1977.   Metabolism  of   synthetic   organic   pesticides   by
anaerobic microorganisms.  Res.  Rev.  66:  63-135.

Hlndholz, M.,  Ed.   1983.   The  Merck  Index, 10th  ed.   Herck and  Co.,  Inc.,
Rahway, NJ.   p. 1343.

Worthing, C.R  and  S.B.  Walker,  Ed.   1983.  The  Pesticide  Manual, 7th  ed.
British Crop Protection Council,  p. 534.

Zdzlenlcka,   M.,  M.  Zleleska,  B. Tudek  and T.  Szymczyk.   1979.   MutagenU
activity of  thlram  In  Ames  tester strains  of Salmonella  typhlmurlum.   Mutat.
Res.  68(1): 9-13.

Zdzlenlcka,   M.,  M.   Zleleska,   M.   Trojanowska   and  T.   Szymczyk.    1981.
Mlcroblal short-term assays with thlram In vitro.   Mutat. Res.   89(1):  1-7.

Zdzlenlcka,   M.,  M. Hrynlewlcz  and  M.   Plenkowska.   1982.   Thlram-lnduced
sperm-head abnormalities 1n mice.  Mutat.  Res.   102(3): 261-264.
0133d
-101-
08/24/89

-------
                                  APPENDIX A

                              LITERATURE SEARCHED



    This  HEED  Is  based  on  data  Identified  by  computerized  literature

searches of the following:

              CHEMlINE
              TSCATS
              CASR online {U.S. EPA Chemical Activities Status Report)
              TOXLINE
              TOXLIT
              TOXLIT 65
              RTECS
              OHM TADS
              STORET
              SRC Environmental Fate Data  Bases
              SANSS
              AQUIRE
              TSCAPP
              NTIS
              Federal Register
              CAS ONLINE (Chemistry and Aquatic)
              HSDB
              SCISEARCH
              Federal Research 1n Progress


These  searches  were  conducted  1n  May,  1988,  and  the following  secondary

sources were reviewed:
    ACGIH  (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1986.  Documentation  of the  Threshold  Limit Values  and Biological
    Exposure Indices, 5th ed.  Cincinnati. OH.

    ACGIH  (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1987.  TLVs:  Threshold  Limit Values for  Chemical  Substances  1n the
    Work  Environment  adopted   by   ACGIH   with   Intended  Changes  for
    1987-1988.  Cincinnati,  OH.  114 p.

    Clayton,   G.D. and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.    1981.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and  Toxicology,  3rd rev.  ed.,  Vol.  2A.   John Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.  2878 p.

    Clayton,   G.D. and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.    1981.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and  Toxicology,  3rd rev.  ed.,  Vol.  2B.   John Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.  p. 2879-3816.
0133d                               -102-                            08/23/89

-------
    Clayton,  G.D.   and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.    1982.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and  Toxicology,  3rd rev.  ed..  Vol.  2C.   John Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.  p. 3817-5112.

    Grayson, N.  and D. Eckroth,  Ed.  1978-1984.   K1rk-0thmer  Encyclo-
    pedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd ed.   John  Wiley and Sons,  NY.   23
    Volumes.

    Hamilton, A. and H.L. Hardy.  1974.   Industrial  Toxicology,  3rd  ed.
    Publishing Sciences Group. Inc., Littleton, MA.   575 p.

    IARC  (International  Agency  for  Research on Cancer).  IARC  Mono-
    graphs  on  the  Evaluation  of  Carcinogenic  Risk  of Chemicals  to
    Humans.  IARC,  WHO, Lyons, France.

    Jaber,  H.M.,  W.R.  Mabey,  A.T.   L1eu,  T.W.  Chou  and  H.L.  Johnson.
    1984.   Data  acquisition   for   environmental   transport  and  fate
    screening for compounds  of Interest  to  the Office of  Solid  Waste.
    EPA  600/6-84-010.    NTIS  PB84-243906.    SRI  International.   Menlo
    Park, CA.

    NTP  (National Toxicology  Program).   1987.   Toxicology Research  and
    Testing  Program.   Chemicals   on   Standard  Protocol.   Management
    Status.

    Ouellette,  R.P. and  J.A.  King.   1977.   Chemical  Week  Pesticide
    Register.  McGraw-Hill Book Co., NY.

    Sax, I.N.  1984.   Dangerous  Properties  of Industrial  Materials,  6th
    ed.  Van Nostrand Relnhold Co.,  NY.

    SRI  (Stanford   Research  Institute).   1987.   Directory  of  Chemical
    Producers.  Menlo Park,  CA.

    U.S.  EPA.   1986.  Report  on Status  Report  In  the  Special  Review
    Program,  Registration  Standards  Program  and   the  Data  Call   In
    Programs.  Registration  Standards and  the  Data  Call  1n  Programs.
    Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC.

    USITC  (U.S.  International  Trade  Commission).   1986.   Synthetic
    Organic  Chemicals.   U.S.  Production  and  Sales,  1985,  USITC  Publ.
    1892, Washington, DC.

    Verschueren, K.   1983.   Handbook of  Environmental Data  on  Organic
    Chemicals, 2nd ed.   Van  Nostrand Relnhold Co., NY.

    Wlndholz, M., Ed.  1983.   The Merck  Index.  10th ed.  Merck and Co..
    Inc., Rahway, NJ.

    Worthing, C.R.  and S.B. Walker,  Ed.   1983.  The  Pesticide  Manual.
    British Crop Protection  Council.  695 p.
0133d                               -103-                            08/23/89

-------
    In addition,  approximately  30  compendia of  aquatic toxlclty  data  were

reviewed, Including the following:


    Battelle's  Columbus  Laboratories.   1971.   Water Quality  Criteria
    Data  Book.   Volume  3.  Effects  of  Chemicals  on  Aquatic  Life.
    Selected  Data  from the  Literature  through  1968.  Prepared  for the
    U.S. EPA under Contract No. 68-01-0007.  Washington, DC.

    Johnson,  U.W.  and H.T.  Flnley.   1980.  Handbook of  Acute  Toxlclty
    of  Chemicals  to  F1sh  and   Aquatic   Invertebrates.   Summaries  of
    Toxlclty  Tests  Conducted  at Columbia  National  Fisheries  Research
    Laboratory.   1965-1978.   U.S.  Dept.  Interior,  Fish and  Wildlife
    Serv. Res. Publ. 137. Washington, DC.

    McKee, J.E. and  H.W.  Wolf.  1963.  Water Quality Criteria,  2nd ed.
    Prepared  for  the  Resources  Agency  of  California,  State  Water
    Quality Control Board.  Publ. No. 3-A.

    Plmental, D.  1971.   Ecological  Effects  of  Pesticides on Non-Target
    Species.  Prepared for the U.S.  EPA, Washington, DC.  PB-26960S.

    Schneider, B.A.   1979.   Toxicology  Handbook.   Mammalian and Aquatic
    Data.  Book 1: Toxicology  Data.   Office  of  Pesticide Programs, U.S.
    EPA, Washington, DC.   EPA 540/9-79-003.  NTIS PB 80-196876.
0133d                               -104-                            08/23/89

-------












































ft>
c

^^
O)

oe

^
o
o
IL.
oe



•**
u
ft>

LU






ft*

I/I
O
X
LU

I/I
0)
•^
u
Of



















oo
o»
31 *""
^ *
JC •
w» r~
e <«
!•>

9
1
i
o o a
i— i w i— i O
1
fc» **
o -o o
U- ft) 3
U 'O
.J "- O
LU (Q ^
a o o o S ftt
l-l I-N 1— 1 Z •- L.


Ifl
^ l/t
^^ ^tf
O» 0)
>J 31
g*
CM
kO L.
o a a • o

<4^
ft*
^
j^
a a a o>



4)
L.
3
I/I
O >»
O *-
X •- Ol
LU U L.
•- 3
e u e i/i o
^S M""> ^J ^J •*<•
«- e o» o e
«* O U O X O
19 1- — C LU L.
r-.ee*- ^
2U O W r— O
A «- L. ro ^
C 3 f £ 91
o»
 0
t^ 1— 1

V)
UJ
P
i—
>• Z

•^ md
0 O
 oo
u o <
»- C h-
§— oe
U O
L. . i- 0.

u o as
09
Crt
»*"
IQ .
^C *
i^ r~-
e re
o ** «c
X ftt Z


















•o
c
g
0.
o
O 0




• *
>»
*- >1
o «^
»• u
X —
o e
*t*t *\t
U 0
— • c
e <~
o u
L. L.
JM ^O
U U

c e
0 0

•a -a
ft* o>
^ ^
fQ (Q
00 00
0133d
-105-
08/23/89

-------
                                  APPENDIX C
            DOSE/DURATION RESPONSE GRAPH(S) FOR EXPOSURE TO THIRAM
C.I.  DISCUSSION
    Dose/duration-response graphs  for  oral  exposure  to thlram  generated by
the method  of  Crockett et al.  (1985)  using the computer  software  by Durkln
and Meylan  (1988) under contract  to  ECAO-C1nc1nnat1 are presented In Figures
C-1 and  C-2.   Data used  to  generate this (these) graph(s) are  presented In
Section C.2.   In  the  generation of this  (these)  f1gure(s)  all  responses are
classified  as  adverse  (PEL,  AEL or LOAEL) or  nonadverse (NOEL  or NOAEL) for
plotting.   If   data  are  available  for   Inhalation exposure:    The  ordlnate
expresses  concentration   In  either of  two  ways.   In  Hgure(s) (—),  the
experimental concentration expressed  as   mg/m3  was multiplied  by  the  time
parameters  of  the exposure protocol  (e.g.,  hours/day  and  days/week) and Is
presented   as   expanded   experimental   concentration    [expanded  exp   cone
(mg/m8)].   In  flgure(s)   (---},  the  expanded  experimental  concentration was
multiplied  by  the cube root  of the ratio of  the  animal:human  body  weight to
estimate  an equivalent human  or  scaled  concentration  [scaled  cone  (mg/m3)]
(U.S. EPA,  1980; Mantel and Schneider man',  1975).
    The  boundary  for  adverse  effects  (solid  line)  Is   drawn by Identifying
the lowest-adverse-effect  dose or concentration at the  shortest duration of
exposure  at which an  adverse  effect  occurred.  From this  point an  Infinite
line  1s  extended upward  parallel to the dose axis.   The  starting  point Is
then  connected to  the  lowest-adverse-effect  dose or  concentration at the
next  longer  duration  of  exposure  that  has  an  adverse-effect  dose  or
concentration  equal  to  or lower  than the  previous  one.   This process  1s
continued  to  the lowest-adverse-effect  dose  or  concentration.  From  this
point a  line 1s  extended  to  the  right parallel  to the duration  axis.   The
region of adverse effects lies above the adverse effects boundary.

0133d                               -106-                            08/23/89

-------
J.MM0B
A
j 10000
•J
\
!
V
H A"8'
$
ft
»
H
a 100 •
2
z
I
i "»-
i -
• ; i i i i i r i i | i i i i i i i i | i .1 iiiiii
F
r r
I F
*.' ' * '

* •• ' BL ng
: lt T k
•
-
1
;
_
I
•
• -•.. t .* s 1
_ . ••
! L r L J-
*• 	 	 	 v 	
I N
N- 	 _„,
r °
t 1 llll_Lll L 1 Illltll 1 1 Illtil

™
•
-
1



0.001 0.01 0.1 1 2
                         HUNAN EQU1U DURATION (fraction lif>sp»n>
                                  FIGURE C-1

           Dose/Duration - Effect Graph for Oral  Exposure to TMram:
                               Envelope Method
0133d
-107-
08/23/89

-------
91
I
10000 -r
3
9
i
  100-r
        10--
r
r
              fc
          0.001

                                                          L


                                                         >f»
                                                  —*-
                                                   n
                  I    1   llllli
                           0.01                   0.1

                        HUMAN CQUIM DURATION (fraction tifcspan)
                                       FIGURE  C-2


                Dose/Duration - Effect Graph for Oral Exposure to Thlram:
                                  Censored  Data Method
     0133d
                                   -108-
                                                           08/23/89

-------
    Using the  envelope  method, the  boundary  for  no adverse  effects  (dashed
line)  Is  drawn  by  Identifying  the  highest  no-adverse-effects  dose  or
concentration.   From this  point  a  line parallel  to  the  duration axis  Is
extended  to  the  dose or  concentration axis.   The starting  point Is  then
connected  to   the   next   highest  or   equal   no-adverse-effect  dose   or
concentration  at  a longer  duration  of exposure.   When this process  can  no
longer be continued,  a line  Is  dropped parallel  to  the dose or concentration
axis  to  the  duration axis.   The region of  no adverse  effects  lies below the
no-adverse-effects  boundary.   At   both  ends  of   the  graph  between  the
adverse-effects and  no-adverse-effects boundaries are  regions  of ambiguity.
The  area (1f  any)  resulting  from  Intersection  of  the adverse-effects  and
no-adverse-effects boundaries 1s defined as the region of contradiction.
    In the censored  data method, all  no-adverse-effect points  located  1n the
region   of   contradiction    are   dropped   from  consideration   and   the
no-adverse-effect  boundary   Is  redrawn so  that  H  does  not   Intersect  the
adverse-effects boundary  and no region of  contradiction  1s  generated.   This
method results  1n  the most  conservative definition  of  the no-adverse-effects
region.
C.2.  DATA USED TO GENERATE DOSE/DURATION-RESPONSE GRAPHS
Chemical Name:    Thlram
CAS Number:       137-26-8
Document Title:   Health and Environmental Effects Document on Thlram
Document Number:  SRC-TR-88-133
Document Date:    12/22/88
Document Type:    HEED
0133d                               -109-                            08/23/89

-------
RECORD II
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Male
PEL
Gavage
               Number Exposed:      NR
               Number Responses:    NR
               Type of Effect:      DEATH
               Site of Effect:      BODY
               Severity Effect:     9
               Number Exposed:      NR
               Number Responses:    NR
               Type of Effect:      DEATH
               SHe of Effect:      BODY
               Severity Effect:     9

Dose:                  400.000
Duration Exposure:      1.0 days
Duration Observation:   1.0 days
Comment :
Citation:
RECORD #2:
L050
Lee et al
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:

., 1978
Rats
Female
FEL
Gavage


Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:


190.000
1.0 days
1.0 days
Comment:
Citation:
RECORD |3:
LD50
Lee et al
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:

.. 1978
Rats
Male
FEL
Gavage


Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:


640.000
1.0 days
-1 .0 days

Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
SHe of Effect:
Severity Effect:
                                   NR
                                   NR
                                   DEATH
                                   BODY
                                   9
Galnes, 1969
0133d
                     -110-
                                           08/23/89

-------
RECORD 14:
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Female
FEL
Gavage
Galnes, 1969
Dose:                  620.000
Duration Exposure:     1.0 days
Duration Observation:  1.0 days
               Number Exposed:      NR
               Number Responses:   NR
               Type of Effect:      DEATH
               Site of Effect:      BODY
               Severity Effect:    9
RECORD #5:
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Mice
Male
FEL
Gavage
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:
Lee et al., 1978
Dose:                  400.000.
Duration Exposure:     1.0 days
Duration Observation:   1.0 days
                                   NR
                                   NR
                                   DEATH
                                   BODY
                                   9
RECORD #6:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Mice
Female
FEL
Gavage
Dose:
Duration
Duration


Exposure:
Observation:

380.000
1.0 days
1.0 days

Comment:

Citation:
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:

LD50

Lee et al., 1978
                                   NR
                                   NR
                                   DEATH
                                   BODY
                                   9
0133d
                     -111-
                                           08/23/89

-------
RECORD #7:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #8:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #9:

Comment:
Citation:
Species: Mice
Sex: NS
Effect: FEL
Route: Oral (NOS)
Number Exposed: NR
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: DEATH
Site of Effect: BODY
Severity Effect: 9
1059; abstract
Matthlaschk, 1973
Species: Rats
Sex: Female
Effect: LOAEL
Route: Oral (NOS)
Number Exposed: NR
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: ENZYM
SHe of Effect: NS
Severity Effect: 2
Altered metabolism of ethanol
Garcia de Torres et al., 1983
Species: Rats
Sex: Hale
Effect: FEL
Route: Food
Number Exposed: 20
Number Responses: 14
Type of Effect: DEATH
Site of Effect: BODY
Severity Effect: 9
2500 ppm In diet; food Intake
Lee et al.. 1978; Short et al
Dose:
Duration
Duration



Dose:
Duration
Duration



Dose:
Duration
Duration
NR
NR
HGTDC
BODY
5
2300.000
Exposure: 1.0 days
Observation: 1.0 days



3.800
Exposure: 2.0 days
Observation: 2.0 days



132.000
Exposure: 13.0 weeks
Observation: 13.0 weeks
20 20
NR NR
ENZYH DEGEN
LIVER TESTE
2 5
also reduced
., 1976

0133d
-112-
08/23/89

-------
RECORD #10:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #11:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #12:
Species: Rats
Sex: Male
Effect: AEL
Route: Food
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
SHe of Effect:
Severity Effect:
1000 ppm In diet
Lee et al., 1978;
Species: Rats
Sex: Male
Effect: LOAEL
Route: Food
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:
500 ppm In diet
Lee et al.. 1978;
Species: Rats
Sex: Male
Effect: AEL
Route: Food

20
NR
WGTOC
BODY
5

Short et
*.

20
NR
UGTDC
BODY
5

Short et

Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
20
NR
ENZYM
KIDNY
2

al., 1976
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:


al., 1976
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
58.000
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks



30.000
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks



41.900
29.0 days
29.0 days
Comment:

Citation:
Number Exposed:     6
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     WGTDC
Site of Effect:     BODY
Severity Effect:    5

300 ppm In diet; controls were pair-fed

Lowy et al.. 1979, 1980
0133d
                     -113-
08/23/89

-------
RECORD #13:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #14:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #15:

Comment:
Citation:
Species: Rats
Sex: Male
Effect: LOAEL
Route: Food
Number Exposed: 6
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: HGTDC
Site of Effect: BODY
Severity Effect: 4
225 ppm In diet; controls
Lowy et al., 1979, 1980
Species: Rats
Sex: Female
Effect: FEL
Route: Food
Number Exposed: 24
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: FUNP
Site of Effect: PNS
Severity Effect: 8
1000 ppm 1n diet
Lee and Peters. 1976
Species: Rats
Sex: Female
Effect: LOAEL
Route: Food
Number Exposed: 24
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: FUND
Site of Effect: CNS
Severity Effect: 7
400 ppm 1n diet
Lee and Peters, 1976
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:

were pair-fed

Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:



Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
24
NR
FUND
PNS
7


33.600
29.0 days
29.0 days



66.900
80.0 weeks
80.0 weeks



25.500
80.0 weeks
80.0 weeks



0133d
-114-
08/23/89

-------
RECORD #16:

Comment :
Citation:
RECORD #17:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #18:
Species: Rats
Sex: Hale
Effect: AEL
Route: Food
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:
400 ppm 1n diet
Lee and Peters, 1976
Species: Rats
Sex: Male
Effect: LOAEL
Route: . Food
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:
100 ppm In diet
Lee and Peters, 1976
Species: Rats
Sex: Female
Effect: FEL
Route: Food

24
NR
FUND
CNS
6

; Lee

24
NR
WGTOC
BODY
5

; Lee

Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:


et al., 1978
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:


et al.. 1978
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
20.400
80.0 weeks
80.0 weeks



5.300
80.0 weeks
80.0 weeks



65.800
36.0 weeks
36.0 weeks
Comment:

Citation:
               Number Exposed:     24
               Number Responses:   NR
               Type of Effect:     FUNP
               Site of Effect:     PNS
               Severity Effect:    8
Lee and Peters, 1976
0133d
                     -115-
08/23/89

-------
RECORD #19:

Comment :
Citation:
RECORD #20:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #21:
Species: Rats
Sex: NS
Effect: PEL
Route: Food
Number Exposed: 24
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: FUNP
Site of Effect: CNS
Severity Effect: 8
Briefly reported; 300 ppm In
E.I. Ou Pont de Nemours & Co.
Species: Rats
Sex: Both
Effect: LOAEL
Route: Food
Number Exposed: 64
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: WGTDC
Site of Effect: BODY
Severity Effect: 5
300 ppm In diet; abstract
Malta et al., I960
Species: Rats
Sex: Both
Effect: NOEL
Route: Food
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:

diet
, n.d
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
64 64
NR NR
HE MAT DEGEN
BLOOD HSKEL
3 5


Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
15.000
2.0 Years
2.0 Years



15.000
2.0 years
2.0 years



1.150
2.0 years
2.0 years
Comment:

Citation:
Number Exposed:     64
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     WGTDC
Site of Effect:     BODY
Severity Effect:    5

30 ppm In diet; abstract

Malta et al.. 1980
0133d
                     -116-
08/23/89

-------
RECORD #22:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #23:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #24:
Species: Dogs
Sex: Both
Effect: PEL
Route: Capsul
Number Exposed: NR
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: DEATH
Site of Effect: BODY
Severity Effect: 9
Abstract; beagles
SaHo et al., 1980
Species: Dogs
Sex: Both
Effect: LOAEL
Route: Capsul
Number Exposed: 8
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: FUND
Site of Effect: CNS
Severity Effect: 7
Abstract, beagles
SaHo et al., 1980
Species: Dogs
Sex: Both
Effect: NOEL
Route: Capsul
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:



Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
8
NR
HE HAT
BLOOD
2


Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
40.000
6.0 weeks
6.0 weeks



4.000
2.0 years
2.0 years



0.400
2.0 years
2.0 years
Comment:

Citation:
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
SUe of Effect:
Severity Effect:

Abstract, beagles

SaHo et al.,  1980
                                  NR
                                  NR
                                  FUND
                                  CNS
                                  7
0133d
                     -117-
08/23/89

-------
RECORD |25:
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Male
AEL
Oral (NOS)
Dose:                  240.000
Duration Exposure:     1.0 days
Duration Observation:  1.0 days
Number Exposed:     NR
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     BEHAV
Site of Effect:     CNS
Severity Effect:    6

Reduced "orientation of hypermotmty*

Thuranszky et al.f 1982
RECORD #26:
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Male
LOAEL
Oral (NOS)
Dose:                  60.000
Duration Exposure:      1.0 days
Duration Observation:   1.0 days
Number Exposed:     NR
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     ENZYH
SHe of Effect:     CNS
Severity Effect:    2

Altered neurotransmUter levels In unspecified tissue

Thuranszky et al., 1982
RECORD #27:
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Minks
Female
LOAEL
Food
               Number Exposed:
               Number Responses:
               Type of Effect:
               Site of Effect:
               Severity Effect:
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation;
                    2
                    NR
                    HEMAT
                    BLOOD
                    2
6.600
28.0 days
28.0 days
45 ppm In diet; dosage 1n males was 8.6 mg/kg/day

Hornshaw et al., 1987
0133d
                     -118-
                                           08/23/89

-------
RECORD #28:
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Ferrets
Hale
PEL
Food
Dose:
Duration
Duration
                                                     Exposure:
                                                     Observation:
27.500
11.0 days
11.0 days
               Number Exposed:      5
               Number Responses:    NR
               Type of Effect:      DEATH
               Site of Effect:      BODY
               Severity Effect:     9
Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #29:
312 ppm; females at this
also died
Hornshaw et al. , 1987
Species: Ferrets
Sex: Male
Effect: LOAEL
Route: Food
dietary level (44.8

mg/kg bw/day)

Dose: 2.800
Duration Exposure: 28.0 days
Duration Observation: 28.0 days
               Number Exposed:      5
               Number Responses:    NR
               Type of Effect:      HGTDC
               Site of Effect:      BODY
               Severity Effect:     5
Comment:
Citation:
RECORD |30:
20 ppm
bw/day) r
Hornshaw
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
In diet; female;
tot affected
et al., 1987
Ferrets
Female
LOAEL
Food
\ at this dietary level

Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
(3.

16
28
28
3 mg/kg

.500
.0 days
.0 days
Number Exposed:     5
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     WGTDC
SHe of Effect:     BODY
Severity Effect:    5

125 ppm 1n diet

Hornshaw et al., 1987
0133d
                     -119-
                                           08/23/89

-------
RECORD #31
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Ferrets
Male
LOAEL
Food
Dose:                  5.600
Duration Exposure:      28.0 days
Duration Observation:   28.0 days
               Number Exposed:      5
               Number Responses:    NR
               Type of Effect:      HEHAT
               Site of Effect:      BLOOD
               Severity Effect:     2
Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #32:
50 ppm In
bw/day)
Hornshaw et
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
diet; effect
al.. 1987
Ferrets
Male
NOEL
Food
also observe

Dose:
Duration
Duration
d In females

Exposure:
Observation:
(8.6 mg/kg

1.100
28.0 days
28.0 days
Number Exposed:     5
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     HEHAT
SHe of Effect:     BLOOD
Severity Effect:    2

8 ppm In diet; no effects In females (1.6 mg/kg bw/day}

Hornshaw et al., 1987
RECORD #33:
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Hamsters
Female
FEL
Gavage
                             Dose:
                             Duration Exposure:
                             Duration Observation:
                                         500.000
                                         1.0 days
                                         1.0 days
               Number Exposed:
               Number Responses:
               Type of Effect:
               SHe of Effect:
               Severity Effect:
                    4
                    NR
                    DEATH
                    BODY
                    9
Given In carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)

Robens, 1969
0133d
                     -120-
                                           08/23/89

-------
RECORD f34:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #35:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD |36:

Species: Hamsters
Sex: Female
Effect: FEL
Route: Gavage
Number Exposed: 4
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: TERAD
SHe of Effect: FETUS
Severity Effect: 8
Given 1n CMC; statistical
Robens, 1969
Species: Hamsters
Sex: Female
Effect: NOAEL
Route: Gavage
Number Exposed: 4
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: TERAD
Site of Effect: FETUS
Severity Effect: 8
Given 1n CMC; statistical
Robens, 1969
Species: Mice
Sex: Female
Effect: NOAEL
Route: Oral (NOS)
Number Exposed: NR
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: TERAO
Site of Effect: FETUS
Severity Effect: 8
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:

analysis not performed

Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:

analysis not performed

Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:

250.000
1.0 days
1.0 days



125.000
1.0 days
1.0 days



250.000
2.0 days
2.0 days

Comment:       Abstract;   NHRI   mice   more   sensitive   than   SW   mice.
               Teratogenlclty  was  observed at  higher  unspecified  doses;  no
               maternal toxlclty

Citation:      Roll, 1971
0133d
-121-
08/23/89

-------
RECORD 137:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #38:
Species: Mice
Sex: Female
Effect: FEL
Route: Oral (NOS)
Number Exposed: NR
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: TERAD
Site of Effect: FETUS
Severity Effect: 8
Abstract; NMRI mice
Matthlaschk, 1973
Species: Rats
Sex: Female
Effect: LOAEL
Route: Gavage
Dose: 10.000
Duration Exposure: 11.0 days
Duration Observation: 11.0 days



Dose: 40.000
Duration Exposure: 10.0 days
Duration Observation: 10.0 days
Comment:


Citation:
               Number Exposed:      10
               Number Responses:    NR
               Type of Effect:      TERAS
               Site of Effect:      FETUS
               Severity Effect:     8
Comment :
Citation:
RECORD #39:
Maternal
Identify
Short et
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
food Intake
NOAEL
a!., 1976
Mice
Female
LOAEL
Gavage
and bw gain r

Dose:
Duration
Duration
educed; study

Exposure:
Observation:
does not

300.000
9.0 days
9.0 days
Number Exposed:     18
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     TERAS
Site of Effect:     FETUS
Severity Effect:    7

Slight  evidence  of  fetotoxldty;  statistical  analysis  not
performed; 4/18 dams  died;  SW mice

Short et al., 1976
0133d
                     -122-
08/23/89

-------
RECORD #40:
Comment:
Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Mice
Female
NOAEL
Gavage
Dose:                  100.000
Duration Exposure:     9.0 days
Duration Observation:  9.0 days
               Number Exposed:     18
               Number Responses:   NR
               Type of Effect:     TERAS
               Site of Effect:     FETUS
               Severity Effect:    7
Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #41:
SH mice;
Short et
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
no evidence
al.. 1976
Rats
Hale
FEL
Food
of maternal or fetal toxlclty
Dose:
Duration
Duration
Exposure:
Observation:
132.000
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks
Number Exposed:     20
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     REPRO
Site of Effect:     NS
Severity Effect:    8

2500 ppm In diet; males  failed  to  Inseminate  control  females;
<50X   of   males  with   Impaired  breeding   performance   had
testlcular lesions

Short et al.t 1976
RECORD #42:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Male
NOAEL
Food
Dose:
Duration
Duration


Exposure:
Observation:

58.000
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks

Comment:

Citation:
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:

1000 ppm 1n diet

Short et al., 1976
                                   20
                                   NR
                                   REPRO
                                   NS
                                   8
0133d
                     -123-
                                           08/23/89

-------
RECORD #43:
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Female
LOAEL
Food
Dose:                  30.000
Duration Exposure:     14.0 days
Duration Observation:  14.0 days
               Number Exposed:     20
               Number Responses:   NR
               Type of Effect:     TERAS
               Site of Effect:     FETUS
               Severity Effect:    7
Comment :
Citation:
RECORD #44:
400 ppm
Short et
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
1n diet; lowest
al., 1976
Rats
Female
LOAEL
Food
dosage tested

Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:


95
27
27


.200
.0 days
.0 days
               Number Exposed:     10
               Number Responses:   NR
               Type of Effect:     SURVI
               Site of Effect:     OTHER
               Severity Effect:    9
Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #45:
Reduced viability and growth of offspring; 1000 ppm In diet
Short et
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
al.. 1976
Rats
Female
NOAEL
Food

Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:

43.400
27.0 days
27.0 days
Number Exposed:     10
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     SURVI
Site of Effect:     OTHER
Severity Effect:    9

No effect on survival of offspring

Short et al., 1976
0133d
                     -124-
                                           08/23/89

-------
RECORD |46:
Comment:


Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Minks
Female
AEL
Food
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
5.700
20.0 weeks
20.0 weeks
Number Exposed:     12
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     SURVI
Site of Effect:     OTHER
Severity Effect:    9

Decreased  average   birth   weight,   possibly  decreased   kit
survival; 40 ppm

Hornshaw et al., 1987
RECORD #47:

Comment :
Citation:
RECORD #48:
Species: Minks
Sex: Female
Effect: LOAEL
Route: Food
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:
Probably decresed
Hornshaw et al..
Species: Minks
Sex: Female
Effect: NOAEL
Route: Food

12
NR
SURVI
OTHER
9
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:

1.500
20.0 weeks
20.0 weeks

kit survival; 10 ppm In diet
1987


Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:

0.400
20.0 weeks
20.0 weeks
Comment:

Citation:
Number Exposed:     12
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     SURVI
SHe of Effect:     OTHER
Severity Effect:    9

No effect on reproduction

Hornshaw et al., 1987
0133d
                     -125-
                                           08/23/89

-------
RECORD #49:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #50:

Species: Ferrets
Sex: Female
Effect: FEL
Route: Food
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
12
NR
REPRO
OTHER
8
7.000
24.0 weeks
24.0 weeks

Reproduction precluded at 64 ppm 1n diet
Hornshaw et al., 1987
Species: Ferrets
Sex: Female
Effect: LOAEL
Route: Food
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
SHe of Effect:
Severity Effect:
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
12
NR
REPRO
OTHER
8
2.100
24.0 weeks
24.0 weeks

Comment:       16  ppm:   reduced  number  of offspring/litter,  Utter weight
               and offspring  body weight at 3 weeks postpartum;  survival  of
               offspring reduced

Citation:      Hornshaw et al., 1987
RECORD #51:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Ferrets
Female
NOAEL
Food
Dose:
Duration
Duration


Exposure:
Observation:

0.610
24.0 weeks
24.0 weeks

Comment:

Citation:
Number Exposed:     12
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     REPRO
Site of Effect:     OTHER
Severity Effect:    8

No effects on reproduction

Hornshaw et al., 1987
NR = Not reported
0133d
                     -126-
08/23/89

-------