United States
         Environmental Protection
         Agency
FINAL DRAFT
ECAO-CIN-G078
September. 1989
         Research  and
         Development
         HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS DOCUMENT
         FOR RDX CYCLONITE
         Prepared for
         OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND
         EMERGENCY RESPONSE
         Prepared by
         Environmental Criteria and Assessment  Office
         Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
         U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency
         Cincinnati, OH  45268
                     DRAFT: oo NOT C,TE OR QUOTE
                             NOTICE
                                           WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
o     This document 1s a preliminary draft.  It has not been formally released
§>  by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency  and should  not at this stage be
„  construed to represent Agency policy.  It Is being circulated  for comments
<=>  on Us technical accuracy and policy Implications.

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

    This report  1s  an external draft  for  review purposes only and  does  not
constitute  Agency  policy.   Mention of  trade names  or commercial  products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                      11

-------
                                    PREFACE

    Health and  Environmental  Effects  Documents (HEEOs) are  prepared  for  the
Office of Solid  Waste  and Emergency Response  (OSHER).  This  document series
1s Intended to support listings under  the  Resource  Conservation and Recovery
Act  (RCRA)   as   well  as  to  provide  health-related   limits  and  goals  for
emergency  and   remedial   actions  under  the   Comprehensive  Environmental
Response,   Compensation   and   Liability  Act   (CERCLA).     Both   published
literature  and   Information  obtained  for  Agency  Program  Office  files  are
evaluated  as they  pertain  to  potential  human  health,  aquatic  life  and
environmental  effects   of  hazardous  waste   constituents.    The  literature
searched  for  In  this  document  and  the  dates  searched  are  Included  In
"Appendix: Literature  Searched."   Literature  search  material  Is  current  up
to 8  months  previous  to  the  final draft date listed on  the  front  cover.
Final draft  document  dates  (front  cover)  reflect  the date  the document  1s
sent to the Program Officer (OSWER).

    Several   quantitative  estimates  are presented  provided  sufficient  data
are  available.    For   systemic  toxicants,  these  Include:  Reference  doses
(RfO's)  for  chronic and  subchronlc exposures  for  both  the Inhalation  and
oral exposures.   The  subchronlc or partial  lifetime  RfD.  Is an estimate  of
an exposure  level which  would not be expected  to cause adverse effects  when
exposure occurs  during  a limited  time  Interval  I.e., for an Interval  which
does not  constitute a  significant portion  of the  llfespan.  This  type  of
exposure estimate  has  not been  extensively  used,  or rigorously  defined  as
previous risk assessment  efforts  have  focused  primarily on  lifetime exposure
scenarios.   Animal  data  used  for  subchronlc estimates  generally  reflect
exposure durations  of  30-90  days.  The general  methodology for  estimating
subchronlc  RfO's   Is   the  same   as   traditionally   employed   for   chronic
estimates, except that  subchronlc  data  are  utilized  when available.

    In the case  of  suspected  carcinogens,  RfD's are  not estimated.  Instead,
a  carcinogenic   potency  factor,   or   q-|  (U.S.  EPA,  1980)  Is   provided.
These potency estimates  are  derived for both  oral  and Inhalation exposures
where possible.   In addition, unit  risk  estimates for air and drinking water
are presented based on  Inhalation  and oral  data, respectively.

    Reportable   quantities   (RQs)  based  on   both   chronic   toxldty   and
carclnogenlclty  are derived.  The RQ  Is used to determine  the  quantity  of  a
hazardous substance for   which  notification  Is  required  In  the  event of  a
release  as   specified   under  the  Comprehensive   Environmental   Response,
Compensation  and  Liability Act  (CERCLA).   These two RQs   (chronic  toxldty
and cardnogenldty)  represent  two  of  six scores  developed (the  remaining
four reflect  IgnltabllUy, reactivity,  aquatic  toxUUy, and  acute mammalian
toxldty).  Chemical-specific RQ's  reflect the  lowest  of  these six  primary
criteria.  The  methodology for chronic toxldty and cancer  based RQs  are
defined 1n U.S.  EPA, 1984 and 1986a, respectively.
                                     111

-------
                               EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY
    RDX cyclonlte  (1,3,5-tr1n1trohexahydro-l,3,5-trlazlne)  Is  a nonvolatile,
white crystalline compound at  room  temperature  (Sax  and  Lewis, 1987).   It Is
soluble In  polar  organic solvents, slightly  soluble In water  and  Insoluble
In  nonpolar  organic  solvents  (Sax  and  Lewis,  1987;  Spanggord  et  al.,
1980a).  RDX  1s  normally produced  by  the  action of nitric add  on  hexamlne
(Ryon  et  al.,  1984).   During  1977,   four  U.S  manufacturing  facilities
produced  between  10.2  and 52 million  pounds  of RDX  (TSCAPP,  1989).   The
primary manufacturing  site was  the Holston  AAP In Klngsport, TN.    RDX  1s
used as an explosive 1n armaments and  munitions  (Spanggord et  al., 1980a).
    The  dominant   fate  process  of  RDX  In  translucent  waters   Is  probably
direct photochemical degradation.  The half-life  for this  process Is about  2
weeks {Spanggord et  al.. 1980b).  Sufficient  data are  lacking to predict the
significance of aerobic  blodegradatlon.  Limited data suggest  that under the
proper conditions  In lakes, ponds and  groundwater, anaerobic  degradation may
be  significant.    Volatilization   from   water   or   soil   Is   probably   not
Important.   Slow   hydrolysis  of  RDX   Is  also  a potential  removal  process
(Spanggord  et  al.,  1980a;  Hoffsommer  and  Rosen, 1973).   When  released  to
soil, RDX  displays moderate  to  high  mobility and can  be expected  to leach
Into groundwater.   This  process  depends  greatly on  the  type  of soil  (Kayser
and Burllnson, 1988).   If  released  to the atmosphere, RDX  may be removed  by
dry  or  wet  deposition.   Direct photochemical  degradation  of  RDX   1n  the
atmosphere may also occur.
    RDX  Is  a  man-made  compound  used In  the manufacture  of  armaments  and
munitions.  RDX can enter  the environment through wastewater  discharge  from
Its production, formulation and  Incorporation Into munitions  and through the
demilitarization  or deepwater  dumping  of  antiquated  munitions  (Hoffsommer
                                     1v

-------
and  Rosen,  1972;  Hoffsommer  et  al.,  1972;  Ryon  et  al.,  1984; Small  and
Rosenblatt,  1974).   RDX  can  also  enter  the  environment  by leaching  from
waste  lagoons   Into  soil  and  from  the  Improper  disposal  of  contaminated
sludge  (Oenklns  et al.,  1986).  RDX  may enter  the atmosphere  through  the
release of contaminated partlculate matter formed during  the Incineration of
ROX-conta1n1ng mixtures (Carroll et  al., 1979;  Ryon et  al., 1984).
    Exposure to RDX Is apparently limited  to areas near  where It Is  manufac-
tured  or  used  In  munitions.   Exposure can occur  by the  Inhalation  of  par-
tlculate matter produced during the  Incineration of RDX-contalnlng mixtures.
    Data  on  the  toxlclty of  RDX to  aquatic  organisms  were obtained  from
studies by Bentley  et  al. (1979) and  Liu et al.  (1984).   RDX was more toxic
to   fish   {96-hour  LC™  =   4.1-6.4  mg/l)   than  Invertebrates   (48-hour
EC5Q   =  >100  mg/l)   or  algae   (96-hr  ECSQ   =  >32   mg/l)  In   acute
static  toxlclty  tests.    The  results  of  flowthrough   toxlclty  tests   In
blueglll and fathead  minnow were similar  to  those  of static  tests  (96-hour
LC5Q  =  6.6-7.6  mg/l);  however,  the   toxlclty  of  RDX  to  catfish  was
reduced   slightly  under   flowthrough   conditions   (96-hour   LC™  =   13
mg/i).   The  most  sensitive   life  stage  of  fathead minnows  exposed  to  RDX
was  7-day-old  fry  (96-hour   LC5Q  =  3.8  mg/l),  followed  In  order   by
60-day-old fry,  30-day-old fry, 1-hour-old fry  and eggs.   Chronic  exposure
to   >4.8  mg/l   of   RDX   produced   a   transitory   decrease   In   daphnld
reproduction.  Although  decreases were reported  In  the survival  and percent
emergence  of  midges exposed  to RDX at  1.3-21  mg/l,  these effects   did  not
appear  to  be related  to  exposure.   Fathead minnows chronically exposed  to
6.3  mg/l  of  RDX  had  reduced  survival  during   the first  60  days  of  the
experiment.   RDX  did  not   accumulate   significantly   In  the   tissues   of
Invertebrates or fish;  however,  a 4-day BCF of  123 was  calculated In  algae.

-------
    Balance  experiments  with  14C-RDX  1n  rats  suggest  that  absorption  of
radioactivity from  the  gastrointestinal  tract Is nearly  complete  {Schneider
et  al.,   1977).    Plasma   levels   of  RDX  1n  rats   and   miniature   swine
administered RDX by gavage  plateaued  after an Initial  rise  and  did  not peak
until  24  hours after  treatment (Schneider  et al.,  1977),  Indicating  that
gastrointestinal  absorption   Is   prolonged.    In  rats  treated  with  RDX
suspended  In saline, higher plasma  levels  were achieved with a  50  mg/kg dose
of  a  finely  powdered  sample  compared with  a 1QO  mg/kg dose  of a  coarse
granular  sample,  demonstrating the effect  of  particle size on  gastrointes-
tinal  absorption  (Schneider  et al.,  1977).   RDX  Is reported to be  absorbed
from the stomach and lung but not through the skin (Taylor,  1975).
    Distribution experiments In rats  (Schneider et  al., 1977, 1978;  MacPhall
et  al.,  1985), miniature  swine (Schneider et  al., 1977) and  mice (Guo  et
al., 1985)  Indicate that distribution  Is rapid  following  oral or Intravenous
administration.  Highest levels of  RDX were found  In  the kidney of  rats and
miniature  swine  (Schneider  et  al., 1977)  and  In  the  lung,  liver  and  kidney
of mice  (Guo  et al.,  1985).  Continued oral exposure  of  rats did  not  result
In  accumulation  of  RDX  In  any tissue  (Schneider et  al., 1978; MacPhall  et
al., 1985).
    RDX appears  to  be  extensively  metabolized  and  excreted as  Indicated  by
recovery  of 43%  of an  oral  dose  of  14C-RDX  as  14CO  In  rats  (Schneider
et  al.,  1977).  Urinary radioactivity accounted  for  34% of the  dose;  only
3.6% of  the urinary radioactivity  constituted unmetabollzed compound.   The
liver  appears  to  be  the  principal  dte  of metabolism  (Schneider  et  al.,
1977).    Within 4  days  of  treatment, excretion  accounted   for  =80% of  the
administered dose.
                                     v1

-------
    In  the  only report  of  Inhalation exposure  to  ROX,  69 humans  showed no
adverse effects  after  exposure  to atmospheric  concentrations  ranging  from
0-1.5 mg/m3 In an ammunition plant (Hathaway and Buck, 1977).
    Subchronlc  exposures  of rats  to  RDX  In  the diet produced  several  dose
related effects.   Levlne et  al.  (1981)  noted  that  mean survival  times of
F344  rats  were Inversely related to concentrations  of  RDX  In  their  diets.
Other  dose-related  effects seen  Included  reduced  mean body  weights  and
reduced serum trlglycerlde  levels.   Dosjes  ranged, from 10-600 mg/kg/day  for
90 days.   At  10 mg/kg/day, male body weights were reduced 6% compared  with
controls.    Cholakls  et  al.   (1980)  reported  that  administration  of  28
mg/kg/day for  90  days In the diets of  F344  rats produced no  adverse effects
but  saw a  dose-related decrease  In  mean body weights at  40  mg/kg/day.   von
Oettlngen et  al.  (1949) reported  no  adverse effects  In rats  fed  RDX  In  the
diets  at  a  dosage  of  15  mg/kg/day  for 10  weeks  and   for  12 weeks,  but
Increased mortality  and decreased weight  gain  at dosages of  25,  50 and  100
mg/kg/day.
    In  a subchronic  study  with B6C3F1 mice, Cholakls  et  al.  (1980) reported
a  dose-related Increase In mean  liver weights  that  was  significant  at  the
highest dose  when the  animals were  exposed  to 0, 80, 145 and 277 mg/kg/day
(TWA  doses)  for 90  days.   The  authors  noted no  significant  effects In  mice
receiving 145 mg/kg/day.
    Subchronlc  studies with  other species  have been  done.   In  dogs,  von
Oettlngen  et  al.  (1949)  saw a  20%  weight  loss  compared with  controls  and
convulsions and behavior changes  In  dogs given 42.9 mg/kg/day  for 42  days
(expanded dose).   Hart (1974)  observed  no adverse  effects when  beagle  dogs
were  given  <10 mg/kg/day for  90 days.   Cynomulgus monkeys  administered  RDX

-------
by  gavage  for  90  days  experienced  no adverse  effects at  a  dosage  of  1
mg/kg/day but had disturbances of  the central  nervous  system at 10 mg/kg/day
(Martin and Hart, 1974).
    Three 2-year dietary studies are reported, one with  B6C3F1  mice (L1sh et
al., 1984).  one with F344 rats  (Levlne et  al.,  1984} and one  with Sprague-
Dawley  rats   (Hart,  1976).   In  mice,  dosages of  1.5  mg/kg/day  caused  no
adverse  effects  while dosages of  7.0  mg/kg/day  caused  biochemical  changes.
Doses of 35  mg/kg/day resulted  1n  testlcular  degeneration  In  the  males  and
higher  renal  weights and  107  (TWA dose) mg/kg/day  produced decreased  body
weights  and   Increased  kidney  and  heart   weights  compared  with  controls.
Results  with  the rats  Indicated  that  there  were  no adverse  effects  at  a
dosage  of   0.3  mg/kg/day  while  doses >1.5  mg/kg/day  produced  prostate
Inflammation  and hemoslderosls  1n  the  males.  Lower  body weights  compared
with controls were  seen In rats  given a dosage of  8  mg/kg/day.   Effects  seen
at  40  mg/kg/day  Included  Increased   mortality  and  reduced  body  weights
compared with controls.   No adverse  effects  at  doses  <10  mg/kg/day  were
noted In a  study with Sprague-Dawley rats,  (Hart,  1976).
    Acute exposures  of  rats  by  gavage  resulted  In LD    values  ranging  from
71-200  mg/kg  (von  Oettlngen  et  al.,  1949;  Dllley  et al., 1979; Cholakls  et
al., 1980);  reported ID™ values  In  mice  administered by gavage  range  from
58-97 mg/kg  (Dllley et al.,  1979; Cholakls et al.,  1980)  with one  outlier
value of 500 mg/kg reported by Spector,  (1956).
    Oral human  exposures  resulted  1n convulsions, seizures  and unconscious-
ness  several   hours or  days  after  exposure  but  no fatalities  have  been
reported.
    The  only  carcinogenic effect  reported  was  seen  In  female B6C3F1  mice
administered  RDX at  0,  1.5,  7, 35 and  175/100 mg/kg/day  for  105 weeks  (Llsh

-------
et al., 1984).  The animals receiving  dosages  >7  mg/kg/day had statistically
significant Increased Incidences of  liver  adenomas  and  carcinomas (combined)
compared with  controls.  This  effect was  not seen  In  the  male mice.   No
carcinogenic effects were seen In F344 rats at doses <40 mg/kg/day.
    RDX was  not mutagenlc  In  the Ames  assay  at  concentrations  <1  mg/plate
with  metabolic  activation  and  <2.5  mg/plate without  activation (Hhong  et
al., 1980;  Cholakls et al..  1980).
    Based  on  U.S.  EPA  classification scheme  RDX was  assigned  to  Group  C,
possible  human  carcinogen,  on   the   basis  of  statistically  significantly
Increased  Incidence of  liver  tumors  1n  female mice  In the  2-year  dietary
study  by  L1sh  et  al.  (1984).    From  these   data,   a  q^  of   5.4xlO~2
(mg/kg/day)'1 was estimated  and a cancer-based RQ  of 100 was derived.
    In reproductive/teratology studies using  Sprague-Dawley rats,  RDX caused
reduction  In fetal  size and maternal  lethality  at  concentrations  of  20
mg/kg/day when  given  by gavage  on days 6-15 of gestation (Angerhofer  et  al.
1986).  In F344 rats, at  concentrations  of  20  mg/kg/day when given  by gavage
on  days  6-19 of  gestation,  RDX  produced  both  embryotoxlclty and  maternal
toxldty  (Cholakls  et  al.,  1980).   F344  rats  exposed  to a  dosage of  16
mg/kg/day  1n a  2-generatlon  reproduction study  showed  signs  of  Impaired
lactation ability but no embryo or maternal toxldty.
    Data were not  sufficient  for  estimating an RfD for  Inhalation  exposure.
A  previously  verified  RfD  for  oral  exposure  of  0.003  mg/kg/day based on  a
NOEL  of  0.3  mg/kg/day  In  a  2-year  rat  study  (Levlne et  al.,  1984)  was
adopted  as the  RfD  for  subchronlc   and  chronic  oral   exposure.   Prostatlc
Inflammation and hemoslderosls of  the spleen  occurred at  1.5  mg/kg/day,  the
next  higher  dose.  An  RQ of 1000  was based  on  prostatlc  Inflammation  and
hemoslderosls of  the  spleen  In a  105-week oral rat  study by Levlne  et  al.
(1984).
                                      1x

-------
                              TABLE  OF CONTENTS

                                                                        Page

1.    INTRODUCTION	      1

     1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER	      1
     1.2.   CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES	      1
     1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA	      2
     1.4.   USE DATA	      2
     1.5.   SUMMARY	      3

2.    ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT	      4

     2.1.   AIR	      4

            2.1.1.   Reaction With Hydroxyl Radicals	      4
            2.1.2.   Reaction With Ozone	      4
            2.1.3.   Photolysis	      4
            2.1.4.   Physical Removal Processes	      4

     2.2.   WATER	      5

            2.2.1.   Hydrolysis	      5
            2.2.2.   Oxidation	      5
            2.2.3.   Photolysis	      5
            2.2.4.   Mlcroblal Degradation	      5
            2.2.5.   Bloconcentratlon	      6
            2.2.6.   Adsorption	      6
            2.2.7.   Volatilization	      6

     2.3.   SOIL	      7

            2.3.1.   Mlcroblal Degradation	      7
            2.3.2.   Hydrolysis	      7
            2.3.3.   Adsorption/Leaching	      7
            2.3.4.   Volatilization	      8

     2.4.   SUMMARY	      8

3.    EXPOSURE	      9

     3.1.   WATER	      9
     3.2.   FOOD	     10
     3.3.   INHALATION	     11
     3.4.   DERMAL	     11
     3.5.   SUMMARY	     11

-------
                          TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  (cont.)
                                                                        Page

4.   ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY	      12

     4.1.   AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY	     12

            4.1.1.   Acute Toxic Effects On Fauna	     12
            4.1.2.   Chronic Effects On Fauna	     14
            4.1.3.   Effects On Flora	     18
            4.1.4.   Effects On Bacteria	     19

     4.2.   TERRESTRIAL TOXICITY	     19
                                                  •
            4.2.1.   Effects On Fauna	     19
            4.2.2    Effects On Flora	     20

     4.3.   FIELD STUDIES	     20
     4.4.   AQUATIC RISK ASSESSMENT	     20
     4.5.   SUMMARY	     20

5.   PHARMACOKINETICS	      23

     5.1.   ABSORPTION	      23
     5.2.   DISTRIBUTION	      24
     5.3.   METABOLISM	      27
     5.4.   EXCRETION	      27
     5.5.   SUMMARY	      28

6.   EFFECTS	      30

     6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	      30

            6.1.1    Inhalation Exposures	      30
            6.1.2.   Oral Exposures	      31
            6.1.3.   Other Relevant Information	      40

     6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY	      44

            6.2.1.   Inhalation	      44
            6.2.2.   Oral	      44
            6.2.3.   Other Relevant Information	      46

     6.3.   MUTAGENICITY	      46
     6.4.   TERATOGENICITY	      47
     6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS	      50
     6.6.   SUMMARY	      51

7.   EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS	      54

     7.1.   HUMAN	      54
     7.2.   AQUATIC	      54
                                     xl

-------
                          TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  (cent.)
                                                                        Page
8.   RISK ASSESSMENT	      55

     8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY	      55

            8.1.1.   Inhalation	      55
            8.1.2.   Oral	      55
            8.1.3.   Other Routes	      55
            8.1.4.   Weight of Evidence	      55
            8.1.5.   Quantitative Risk Assessment	      56

     8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	      58

            8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure	      58
            8.2.2.   Oral Exposure	      58

9.   REPORTABLE QUANTITIES	      62

     9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	      62
     9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY	      65

10.  REFERENCES	      68

APPENDIX A	     A-l

APPENDIX B	     B-l

APPENDIX C	     C-l

APPENDIX D	     0-1
                                      xll

-------
No.

5-1

6-1


9-1

9-2

9-3
                         LIST OF  TABLES

                              TUIe

Concentrations (±S.D.) of ROX In  Animal Tissues,
Incidence of Liver Adenoma/Carcinoma In B6C3F1  Mice Fed
CyclonHe for 105 Weeks	
Oral Tox1c1ty Summary for ROX.

Oral Composite Scores for RDX.
RDX:  Minimum Effective Dose (MED)  and Reportable
Quantity (RQ)	
9-4    Derivation of Potency Factor (F)  for  RDX.
Page

  25


  45

  63

  64


  66

  67
                                    xlll

-------
                             List  of  Abbreviations
AAP        Army ammunition plant
AEL        Adverse-effects level
BCF        Bloconcentratlon factor
CAS        Chemical Abstract Service
CBC        Complete blood cell
CNS        Central nervous system
CS         Composite score
CSF        Cerebral spinal fluid
DMSO       Dimethyl sulfoxlde
           Concentration effective to 50% of recipients (and all other
           subscripted concentration levels)
           Frank effect level
           Fischer 344
           Genus mean acute value
           Genus mean chronic value
           Soil sorptlon coefficient
           Octonol/water partition coefficient
           Concentration lethal to 50% of recipients (and all other
           subscripted concentration levels)
LD50       Dose lethal to 50% of recipients
LOAEL      Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level
LOEC       Lowest-observed-effect concentration
MED        Minimum effective dose
HFO        Mixed function oxldase
MTD        Maximum tolerated dose
NOAEL      No-observed-adverse-effect level
NOEC       No-ovserved-effect concentration
PEL
F344
GHAV
GMCV
Koc
Kow
                                     xlv

-------
                         List  of  Abbreviations  (cent.)
NOEL      No-observed-effect level
PEL       Permissible exposure limit
ppm       Parts per million
RfD       Reference dose
RQ        Reportable quantity
SER       Smooth endoplasmlc retlculum  -
STEL      Short-term exposure level
TLV       Threshold limit value
TNT       Trinitrotoluene
TWA       Time-weighted average
                                     xv

-------
                              1.   INTRODUCTION
1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER
    RDX  1s  the common  name  for 1,3,5-trlnHrohexahydro-l,3.5-trlazlne.  It
1s  also  known  as  cyclonUe,  cyclotrlmethylenenltramlne, cyclotrlmethylene-
trlnltrarolne  and   hexogen  (Chemllne,  1989;  SANSS,  1989).    The  structure,
molecular  weight,   empirical  formula  and  CAS  number  for   1.3,5-tMnHro-
hexahydro-l,3,5-tr1az1ne are  as  follows:

Molecular weight:  222.26
Empirical formula:  C_H,N,n,
                     J D OUt)
CAS Registry number:  121-82-4
1.2.   CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL  PROPERTIES
    RDX  1s  a white  crystalline solid  at  room temperature  (Sax  and Lewis,
1987).   A  powerful  chemical  oxldant,  It  Is  1.5  times  more  powerful  and
explosive than  TNT (Sax and  Lewis,  1967).   It Is  soluble  In polar organic
solvents  such  as  acetone,  ether  and methanol,  and Insoluble  In  nonpolar
organic  solvents  such  as carbon tetrachlorlde  and carbon  dlsulflde  (Sax and
Lewis. 1987; Ulndholz  et al.,  1983).   Selected physical  properties for RDX
are as follows:
    Melting point:         203.5°C                 Sax and  Lewis, 1987
    Density:               1.82 g/fflt               Sax and  Lewis, 1987
    Vapor pressure
       at 20°C:            4.1xlO~" mm Hg          Spanggord et al..  1980a
5940H
-1-
07/28/89

-------
    Hater solubility
      at 208C:
      at 25°C:
    Log Kow:
    Conversion  factor
      at 25eC:
                           38.4
                           76 mq/4
                           0.87
Spanggord et al., 1983
Small and Rosenblatt, 1974
Hansch and Leo, 1985
                           1  ppm * 9.09 mg/m3
                           1  mg/m1 * 0.11 ppm
1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA
     The  production  of  RDX  was  reported  as  102  million  pounds in  1972;
however,  this  figure is  thought  to  represent  95%  of  the total  produced
(Small   and  Rosenblatt.  1974).    Thus,  the  actual  1972  production  was  an
estimated 107  million pounds.   RDX is usually synthesized  by  the nitration
of hexamine and  purified  by  recrystalllzation (Ryon et  al., 1984).  RDX  is
produced  for   use   at  Army  munitions  plants  but   1s   not   manufactured
commercially.   Plants that produced RDX in 1977 and their  production  volumes
are as  follows (TSCAPP, 1989):
    IMC Chemical Group         Spanish Fork,  UT
    IMC                        Libertyville,  IN
    Holston AAP                Ktngsport, TN
    Confidential               Confidential
More recent  data regarding  the  production  of  RDX  were  not located in  the
available literature.
1.4.   USE DATA
    RDX  is  used mainly as an explosive for munitions, although  it has been
used as  a  rat poison (Small  and  Rosenblatt,  1974;  Windholz et  al.,  1983).
                                                     0.1-1  mi 11 ion pounds
                                                     1,000-10,000 pounds
                                                     10-50  mi 1 lion pounds
                                                     0.1-1  mi 11 ion pounds
5940H
                                     -2-
                    06/20/89

-------
RDX  1s   usually  handled  while  wet  or  as  a  slurry  In water  to  prevent
detonation during processing.
1.5.   SUMMARY
    RDX  Is  a  nonvolatile,  white  crystalline compound  at  room  temperature
{Sax and  Lewis,  1987).   It  Is soluble  In  polar organic solvents,  slightly
soluble In water and  Insoluble 1n nonpolar organic solvents  (Sax and  Lewis,
1987; Spanggord  et  al.,  1980a).  RDX  Is  normally.produced  by the  action  of
nitric  acid  on   hexamlne  (Ryon  et  al.,  1984).   During  1977,   four  U.S
manufacturing  facilities  produced  between  10.2-52  million  pounds  of  RDX
(TSCAPP,  1989).   The  primary  manufacturing  site  was  the   Holston  AAP  In
Klngsport,  TN.  RDX  Is  used as  an explosive  In armaments and  munitions
{Spanggord et al., 1980a).
5940H
-3-
07/28/89

-------
                    2.   ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT
2.1.   AIR
    Elsenrlch  et  al.  (1981)  report  that  organic  compounds  with  a  vapor
pressure 
-------
2.2.   WATER
2.2.1.   Hydrolysis.  Hydrolysis  at environmentally  significant pHs  should
be  slow.   The  rate constant for  hydrolysis  at  pH 7 and  30°C  was  reportedly
4.7xlO~B  s"1  (Spanggord  et al.,  1980a).    This  translates  to  a  half-life
of  170  days In  neutral waters.   An  11.6%  loss  of  RDX was  observed In  a
seawater solution  stored  In  light-filtering  bottles  for  112 days (Hoffsommer
and  Rosen, 1973).  The  loss  was  attributed  to  hydrolysis;  however,   no
control samples were used.
2.2.2.   Oxidation.  Pertinent data  regarding the oxidation of  RDX  In water
were not located In the available literature cited 1n Appendix A.
2.2.3.   Photolysis.  The quantum yield of  RDX  Is  0.16  at  a wavelength  of
299 nm  {Spanggord  et al.,  1983).   The experimental half-lives  for  sunlight
photolysis  of  RDX  In  distilled   water,   Holston   River,   TN,  water  and
Searsvllle Pond water were  13, 14 and  9 days, respectively, In January, 1980
(Spanggord et  al.,  198Qb).
    The rate constants  for  photolytlc  transformation  of RDX  In a  Louisiana
munitions  plant wastewater  lagoon  were  0.016  cm/day   (winter)  and  0.076
cm/day  (summer) at a  depth  of 50  cm.   This  translates  to half-lives  of 2000
and 456  days,  respectively  (Spanggord  et  al.,  1983).  This  slow  photolysis
rate can be attributed to the high absorptivity  of light by the lagoon.
2.2.4.   Mlcroblal   Degradation.    RDX   resisted  aerobic  degradation  during
studies 18-90  days long  using  Inoculum from various  sources (Spanggord  et
al.,  1980a, 1983;  McCormlck et  al.,  1981).   In a 70  l  biological  treatment
simulator, RDX  underwent  14% degradation In 5 days  when  an activated sludge
Inoculum was used  (Small and Rosenblatt, 1974).   ROX at  concentrations of  50
or  100  ug/8, was completely  removed  after  4 days under  anaerobic  conditions

5940H                                -5-                              07/28/89

-------
In nutrient broth  cultures  with a sewage sludge  Inoculum  (McCormkk  et al.,
1981).  Metabolites  Identified  1n  this study  Include hydrazlnes,  dimethyl
hydrazlnes, dlmethylnltrosamlnes,  azoxymethane,  formaldehyde and  methane!.
In the laboratory, 13 ppm RDX  1n lagoon wastewater  did not undergo anaerobic
degradation for  83 days  while  a  yeast extract  was  repeatedly  added as  a
nutrient.   After  90  days,  the  RDX  concentration  dropped to  2.9  ppm.   After
92  days,   the  RDX concentration  was  1.3  ppm  (Spanggord  et  al.,   1983}.
Subsequently,   RDX-accllmated  micro-organisms   from  these  experiments  were
Incubated  with  ROX In  various  nutrient-fed systems.  Rapid  degradation  was
observed;   In  one  case,  9.1  ppm  RDX  was  reduced  to 0.6  ppm  In  5  days.
Anaerobic  degradation  also  occured  1n  the  presence of  a  yeast  extract
cometabolUe during dleaway  studies using 10 ppm  RDX 1n  river water and pond
water (Spanggord et al., 1980a).  Degradation was complete  1n 10  and  8 days,
respectively.  These  data  suggest that  under  laboratory conditions, RDX  can
undergo anaerobic blodegradatlon.
2.2.5.   B1oconcentrat1on.    The whole-body BCF  In  the   blueglll,  Lepomls
macrochlrus. was  24.8  (Ryon et  al.,  1984), suggesting that  bloaccumulatlon
In aquatic organisms  Is  not  an Important fate process.
2.2.6.   Adsorption.   K    values  for  RDX  In sediment   from  the  Hols ton
                        oc
River, TN, ranged  from  0.8-270  (Spanggord et al., 1980a, 1983). These  values
suggest  moderate  to  low  adsorption  to   sediment   and   suspended   organic
material  (Swann  et   al.,  1983);  however,   RDX  was  found  In  sediment  at
concentrations <43,000  yg/g  1n a stream receiving  high levels of  munitions
wastes (Spanggord et  al.,  1983).
2.2.7.   Volatilization.  Based on  RDX's   water  solubility.  38.4 mg/i   at
20°C  (Spanggord  et al., 1983),  and  vapor   pressure, 4.1xlO~9  mm  Hg at  20°C
5940H
-6-
10/02/89

-------
(Spanggord  et  al.,  1983),  a Henry's  Law constant  of S.lxKT11  atm-raVmol
at 20° C  can  be calculated.  This value  suggests  that volatilization of ROX
from water Is not an Important fate process.
2.3.   SOIL
2.3.1.   M1crob1a1 Degradation.   Aerobic degradation for RDX  Is  not  known to
occur  (Spanggord  et al.,  1980a,  1983; McCormlck  et  al.,  1981).  Osman  and
Klausmeler  (1973)  observed some loss  of  RDX during aerobic  soil  enrichment
studies,    but   there   was   no   evidence   that  .this  loss   was   due   to
blodegradatlon.   Under  the proper conditions,  anaerobic  degradation  of  RDX
by acclimated  microorganisms  occurs  (Spanggord  et al., 1980a,  1983;  Ryon et
al..   1984),   and   this   may  be  an   Important   fate  process  In  soil.
Blodegradatlon  of  RDX  In  soil  was suggested,  but not quantified,  during  a
lyslmeter column study (Kayser and Burllnson, 1988).
2.3.2    Hydrolysis.   Pertinent  data  regarding hydrolysis  of  RDX   1n  soil
were  not  located  In the available  literature cited In Appendix A;  however,
limited data for aquatic systems  suggest  the potential for  removal from soil
via this  mechanism.
2.3.3.   Adsorption/Leaching.   K    values   for  RDX  In sediment  from  the
                                 OC
Holston  River, TN,  ranged  from  0.8-270  (Spanggord  et al.,  1980ar  1983).
These  K    values  suggest  moderate  to high  mobility  In soil  (Swann  et al.,
1983).   In  a   6-month  study  using   2-foot   lyslmlter  columns,  Kayser  and
Burllnson  (1988)  found  that  RDX  movement  varied   considerably  In  four
different  types of  soils.   These  soils ranged  In  texture as  well  as ability
to fix compounds  because  of their various amounts of  organic  matter and  1on
exchange   capacity.   Half  of  the  soils displayed  a  strong  affinity  for  RDX
while the other half allowed RDX to leach through  the  column.
5940H                                -7-                              10/03/89

-------
                                                                _9
2.3.4.   Volatilization.   The  vapor  pressure  of  ROX,  4.1x10    mm  Hg  at
20°C  (Spanggord  et al.,  1980a),  suggests that  volatilization from  soil  Is
not an Important fate process.
2.4.     SUMMARY
    The  dominant  fate  process  of  RDX   In  translucent  waters   Is  probably
direct photochemical  degradation.   The half-life  for  this  process  Is  a few
weeks (Spanggord et al.,  1980b).  Insufficient  data  are  available to predict
the significance of  aerobic  blodegradatlon.  Limited data suggest that  under
the proper conditions In  lakes,  ponds  and groundwater, anaerobic  degradation
may  be   significant.   Volatilization  from water  or  soil   Is  probably  not
Important.   Slow  hydrolysis  of  RDX   Is  also  a  potential  removal  process
(Spanggord et  al.,  1980a;  Hoffsommer  and  Rosen,  1973).   When  released  to
soil, RDX  displays moderate to  high  mobility  and  can  be expected  to  leach
Into groundwater.  This process  depends  greatly on  the  type  of  soil (Kayser
and Burllnson, 1988).   If released  to  the atmosphere, RDX may be removed by
dry  or   wet  deposition.   Direct photochemical  degradation  of   RDX In  the
atmosphere may also occur.
5940H                                -8-                              07/28/89

-------
                                 3.    EXPOSURE
    ROX  Is  a  synthetic organic compound manufactured  and  processed predomi-
nantly by  military  armament plants  as  an  explosive In  munitions  (Small and
Rosenblatt, 1974).   RDX  can  enter  the  environment through  wastewater  dis-
charge from Us  production, formulation and Incorporation  Into  munitions or
through  the demilitarization  of antiquated munitions  (Hoffsommer  and Rosen,
1972; Hoffsommer  et  al., 1972; Ryon  et  al.,  1984).  RDX can  also enter the
environment by leaching  from waste  lagoons and  from the  Improper disposal of
contaminated  sludge  (Jenkins  et  al.,  1986).    RDX  may be  released  to  the
atmosphere  In  contaminated  participate matter  formed during the  Incineration
of mixtures that contain RDX (Carroll et al.,  1979; Ryon et al.,  1984).
    The  National  Occupational   Exposure  Survey, conducted  between  1981  and
1983, estimated  that  488 workers are  occupatlonally exposed  to  RDX (NIOSH,
1984).   The  available  monitoring   data  suggest   that  probable  routes  of
exposure for  the  general public Include Ingestlon of  contaminated water and
Inhalation  of  contaminated  partlculate matter  produced 1n  the  Incineration
of RDX-conta1n1ng waste.
3.1.   WATER
    ROX  concentrations  of  0.1-0.15  mg/l  were  found  In   Brush   Creek,  IA,
which originates on an  AAP  (Small and  Rosenblatt,  1974).  RDX concentrations
In  a stream  near  an   AAP  In  Milan  ranged  from  0.1-109  mg/8,   (mean  11.9
mg/i) (Ryon et al.,  1984).   RDX  was  detected  In  a  river  1  mile  from the
point of  last  discharge  from the  Holston  AAP  at a  concentration of  79
iig/8.  (Ryon  et  al.,   1984).    An  on-s1te   lagoon  at  an  unspecified  AAP
contained  6280  jig/a (Jenkins  et  al., 1986).   ROX  was  not  found  200  miles
off the  Florida coast  or  45 miles west  of  San  Francisco; two sites where old
ships loaded  with  antiquated  munitions were  scuttled  at sea  (Hoffsommer  et
al., 1972; Hoffsommer  and Rosen, 1972)

5940H                                -9-                              10/02/89

-------
    A  plume  of  RDX-contamlnated  groundwater   stretched  6.5  km  near  the
Cornhusker,   IA,   AAP.    Concentrations   ranged   from  9   to  >100   yg/a
(Spa"Iding and Fulton, 1988).  In  4/39  groundwater  samples  taken at  the Milan
AAP,  detectable  levels  of  RDX  ranged  from  <20-780  yg/l  {average  270
yg/l)  (Ryon  et al..  1984).  RDX was  detected  In  7/7  groundwater wells  at
a  munitions  disposal   site In  concentrations  of  1-47  yg/4  (Richard  and
Junk,  1986).   An  unspecified   AAP water  supply  well  contained  70  yg/l
(Jenkins et al., 1986).
    RDX  was  found  In  5/5  sediment   samples  (2600-38.000  yg/g;   average
11,080  ng/g)  from an on-s1te lagoon at the Milan  AAP  (Ryon et  al.,  1984).
In  the  sediment  of  a  nearby  stream,  RDX  was  found  In  3/15  samples  at
290-43,000  yg/g (average  15,160 ng/g).   The   sediment  of  a Louisiana  AAP
wastewater  lagoon contained  0.10-89  yg/g (Spanggord  et al.,   1983).   RDX
was not  found  In  five sediment  samples taken  near  deepwater munitions  dumps
In the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans (Hoffsommer  et al., 1972)
    RDX  was quantitatively determined  In the  wastewater  effluent  of  the
Holston  AAP.   Over a  6-month  period  In  1973,  the concentration In  various
effluent  discharges  ranged  from  <0.1-24.4   mg/i,  with   average   concen-
trations  ranging  from  0.4-10.4 mg/l (Small  and  Rosenblatt,  1974).   In
1979,  the  average dally  discharge  of   RDX  from this plant  was  156  Ibs/day
(Ryon et al., 1984).
3.2.   FOOD
    Pertinent data regarding  RDX 1n food  were not located  In  the available
literature cited In Appendix A..
5940H                                -10-                             10/02/89

-------
3.3.   INHALATION
    People  living  near  plants  where  RDX  1s  manufactured,  formulated  or
packed Into munitions may be  exposed  to  RDX by  Inhalation.  RDX was found 1n
participate matter  released  during Incineration of  waste  munitions (Carroll
et al., 1979; Ryon et al.,  1984).
3.4.   DERMAL
    Pertinent data  regarding  dermal  exposure to RDX were  not  located  In the
available literature cited  1n Appendix A..
3.5.   SUMMARY
    RDX  Is  a  man-made compound  used In  the manufacture of armaments  and
munitions.  RDX  can enter  the environment  through wastewater  discharge from
Us production,  formulation and  Incorporation Into munitions  and through the
demilitarization  or deepwater  dumping  of  antiquated munitions  (Hoffsommer
and  Rosen,  1972;  Hoffsommer  et  al., 1972;  Ryon  et al.,  1984;  Small  and
Rosenblatt,  1974).   RDX can  also  enter  the  environment  by leaching  from
waste  lagoons  Into soil  and  from  the  Improper  disposal  of  contaminated
sludge (Jenkins  et  al., 1986).   RDX may  be detected  In groundwater when wash
waters  are  used  to  clean   equipment   and  Interior  surfaces  at  munition
manufacturing and  demilitarization  facilities.   The wash  water  Is collected
In  holding  tanks and  periodically  pumped  through carbon  absorption  columns
before being  discharged  to  surface streams (Jenkins et  al.,  1986).  RDX may
enter  the  atmosphere through  the release  of contaminated  partlculate  matter
formed during the  Incineration  of  RDX-conta1n1ng  mixtures (Carroll et al.,
1979; Ryon et al., 1984).
    Exposure  to  RDX  1s apparently  limited  to areas  near  where It Is manufac-
tured  or  used  In  munitions.   Exposure can occur  by the  Inhalation of par-
tlculate matter  produced during  the  Incineration  of  RDX-contalnlng mixtures.


5940H                                -11-                             10/03/89

-------
                          4.  ENVIRONMENTAL  TOXICOLOGY
4.1.   AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
4.1.1.   Acute Toxic  Effects  On Fauna.  RDX  that  had  been  dried and  mixed
with  acetone  was  used 1n  static  acute toxlclty tests  conducted  In  a series
of  freshwater  Msn and  aquatic  Invertebrates  (Bentley  et al.,  1979).   The
Invertebrates  tested  were <1-day-old  water  fleas,  Daphnla magna.  juvenile
scud,  Gammarus  fasclatus. juvenile  sowbugs,  Asell us  mllltarIs. and  second
and  third  Instar  midge  larvae, Chlronomus  tentans.   For  each  Invertebrate
species, three  groups of  five  animals were  tested  at  each  of  the  five or
more  nominal  exposure concentrations.  Water  temperature was  maintained at
2Q*C.   The  24-  and  48-hour EC^   values  for   Immobilization  exceeded  100
rag/i,  the  highest  concentration  tested.   In  all four  Invertebrate  species.
Fish were more sensitive  than the  Invertebrates to the toxic  effects of ROX.
The  ranges  of  24-,   48- and  96-hour  LC5Q  values   In  fish  were  7.5-14,
5.8-8,5  and   4.1-6.4  mg/l,  respectively.   There  was  little  difference  1n
susceptibility among  the  species  tested,   which Included  blueglll  sunflsh,
Lepomls  macrochlrus.  rainbow   trout,  Salmo  galrdnerl.   channel   catfish,
Ictalurus  punctatus.   and  fathead minnow Plmephales   promelas.   For  each
species, three groups  of 10  fish were tested at each  nominal  concentration.
Water  temperature  was kept  at   10°C  for   the  trout  and  20°C  for the  other
species.   Life  stage  tests  were  conducted  on fathead  minnows.  In  these
tests,  eggs  were exposed  to  RDX  for  144  hours, and  1-hour-old, 7-day-old,
30-day-old  and  60-day-old fry  were  each  exposed  for   96  hours.    Thirty
minnows of each  life  stage,  In  three groups of  10 each,  were  tested  at each
nominal  concentration.   Water  temperature for  these  tests  was 25°C.   The
LC    for  minnow  eggs was  >100 mg/l  after  24- to  144-hour  exposure.   In
5940H                                -12-                             07/28/89

-------
comparison,  the 96-hour  LC5Q  In  the  static  test  was  4.1  rog/l.    In  the
other fish  tested  (blueglll sunMsh  and  fathead minnow; 30  of  each exposed
to  every  concentration),  24- and  48-hour  and  Incipient  LC5Q  values  were
>10,  6.6-7.6  and  5.2-6.4  mg/B.,  respectively.    Incipient  IC™  values  In
fish were calculated at 264 hours.
4.1.2.   Chronic Effects On Fauna.
    4.1.2.1.   TOXICITY —  Studies  of chronic to*1dty  were performed with
freshwater  Invertebrates  using  a  solution  of  RDX  In   DMSO solvent  under
flowthrough   conditions   (Bentley  et  al.,   1979).   Both   untreated   and
DMSO-exposed  controls  were  used.   Water   fleas,   Daphnla  magna.   20   per
aquarium,   and  midge   larvae,  Chlronomus  tentans.  100   per  aquarium,  were
tested.    Four  replicates   were   employed   at  each  exposure  concentration.
Measured  concentrations  to which  water fleas  were  exposed  were  1.4,  2.2,
4.8, 9.5  and 20 mg/l.  Survival  of  the first  generation  (up to day  21)  was
not  affected  by  treatment.   The  average   number  of  young  produced  per
parthenogenetlc  first-generation  female was significantly  reduced  at  >4.8
mg/i, between  days  7  and 14, but not  between  days  14 and 21.  In  the  second
generation,  neither  survival  (up to  day 42)  nor reproduction differed  from
controls.    Based on  first-generation reproductive  effects, a  NOEC  of  2.2
mg/l  and  a  LOEC of  4.8 mg/l  were  derived  from  this  study.   Midges  were
exposed to  measured RDX concentrations  of  1.3,  2.2, 4.0,  10  and  21  mg/i.
No  effect  on  the  survival  of   larvae,  pupae  or  adults,  or  the  percent
emergence of  adults  was seen In  the  first  generation (up  to day  23).  Only
Infertile eggs  were  produced  by midges exposed  to 1.3 and 4.0 mg/i,  and  no
eggs at all  were produced  at  10 mg/l.   These effects  did  not appear  to  be
exposure-related  since  reproduction  was   unaffected   by   exposure  to   21
mg/l.  The  second  generation  was Initiated  from control eggs In  the  groups
5940H                                -14-                              07/28/89

-------
o
that  did  not  successfully  reproduce.   Although  significant reductions  In
second generation  survival  and  percent  emergence  were  found,  1t does  not
appear  that   these  effects   were  exposure-related;   good  dose-response
relationships were  not  attained,  and  effects were  found In  groups  started
with  control  eggs even though  these  were  actually being exposed  to  RDX for
the first time and first-generation effects had not  been  seen.  Reproduction
was  not  affected  In  the  second  generation.    The  inconsistent  results
obtained in this study preclude deriving effective concentration levels.
    Bentley et  al.  (1979)  performed  a critical  life  stage  toxicity  test in
which the eggs  and  fry  of channel  catfish, Ictalurus  punctatus.  and  fathead
minnows, Pimeghalej promelas.  were exposed to RDX  in  DMSO  for 30 days under
flowthrough  conditions.   Both  untreated  and  OMSO-exposed  controls  were
Included  In  these studies.   Eggs, 50/concentration for  catfish  and  40/con-
centratlon for  minnows, were exposed  within 48 hours  of  fertilization.  The
eggs  hatched  within  3-8  days.   In the  catfish,  25  fry were  selected from
each  group for  continued  exposure.  In the minnow,  the  number  selected was
based  on  percent  hatch.   The  tests  were  conducted  at  22°C.   Catfish were
exposed to  mean measured  concentrations  of  0,  0.11,  0.71  and  2.3  mg/^ of
RDX.   Other  exposure  levels  were  estimated  to  be  0.30  and   1.2  mg/l.
Percent hatch of eggs was not affected by  exposure.   Although survival after
30  days  was   reduced  at  ^1.2   mg/^,  this  was  attributed  to   a  diluter
malfunction   early   in   the   experiment   that  temporarily   increased  RDX
concentrations  above  the  mean   exposure  levels;  most  mortality occurred
within 6 days of  the  malfunction.   Body length at  30  days  was unaffected by
exposure.   Effective  concentration levels  could  not  be derived from  this
study because  of  the  diluter malfunction.   Minnows  were  exposed  to mean

5940H                                -15-                             06/20/89

-------
measured  concentrations  of   0,  0.26,  1.2  and  5.8 mg/i.   Other  exposure
levels  were  estimated  to  be 0.76 and  3.0 mg/i.   There were  no  effects on
percent  hatch  of  eggs  or  survival  at  30  days;   body  length was  reduced
slightly,  but  significantly.  In  the  30-day-old  fry exposed  to  5.8  mg/i.
This concentration was  taken to be the LOEC  In  this study;  the NOEC was 3.0
mg/i.
    The  effect  of chronic exposure  to  RDX  In  freshwater fish  under  flow-
through  conditions was  also  studied by -Bentley  et"  al.  (1979).   In the first
test,   fathead  minnows,   Plmephales   promelas.   were  exposed  to  measured
concentrations  of  0,  0.29,   0.64,  1.1,  2.7  and 4.9 mg/l of  RDX  In  DHSO.
Both untreated  and DMSO-exposed controls  were  Included 1n this  study.   The
study  design was  as  follows:  two  aquaria,  each  containing 60  eggs,  were
exposed  at each concentration and,  after  hatching,  two groups of 20 fry were
selected  for  continued  exposure from each aquarium.  On  day  181,  after most
fish had reached  sexual maturity,  each group was  reduced  to  three males and
seven  females.   Groups of  50  eggs  from  the  first seven  spawns  In  each
aquarium were  Incubated,   and  20  fry from the  first two egg groups  In each
aquarium were  selected  for  continued   exposure.    The   total  duration  of
exposure  for  adult fish was  240  days.   Water  temperature  was  maintained at
25°C.   There were  no  effects  on  percent hatch,  survival  at  30  days,  or
length  at 30 or 60  days.   Survival at 60  days was  reduced  from 93-100% In
controls  to  65-75%   1n the  4.9  mg/l group,   but  the  difference was  not
statistically significant.   No  mortality  was  recorded between day 60 and day
140,  when the  fish   were  all  killed  accidentally  while  being  treated  for
external  parasites.
    A second  test  was  then conducted.   The mean measured concentrations were
0,  0.43, 0.78,  1.5,  3.0  and 6.3  mg/i.  Percent hatch  was not  affected by
ROX  exposure.   Survival was  significantly  reduced   from 93-100%  1n controls
5940H                                -16-                             07/28/89

-------
to  c?25%  at  30  days  and  15% at  60  days   1n  fish  exposed  to  6.3  mg/l.
Neither  30-  nor  60-day   survival  was  affected  at  lower  concentrations.
Length was  not  Influenced  by  30- or 60-day  exposure.   Between days  64  and
181,  only four  deaths  occurred,  suggesting  that RDX  was not  cumulatively
toxic after  60 days.  At  240  days,  percent  survival, length and  wet  weight
of  both  males and  females were  unchanged from  controls.  Also  unaffected
were  spawning  activity,   hatchabllHy  j»f  second-generation  eggs,  percent
survival,  length and wet  weight  of  second-generation fish  after 30  days.
Water quality  parameters  were measured and  found not to  be affected  by  RDX
concentration  In  this  study.   A  LOEC  of  6.3  mg/l,   based  on  reduced
survival  during  the  first 60  days  of  the   experiment,  and a  NOEC  of  3.0
mg/i, were taken from this study.
    4.1.2.2.   BIOACCUWJLATION/BIOCONCENTRATION  --   Exploratory   bloconcen-
tratlon  tests  In   fish  and  Invertebrates  were  conducted by  Liu  et  al.
(1984).   RDX,   labeled  with  14C  and   dissolved  in  DMSO,  was   added   to
aquaria containing 50 annelid worms,  LumbMculus  varlegatus.  100 adult water
fleas,  Daphnla  magna.  or  3  blueglll  sunflsh,  Lepomls   macrochlrus,  at  a
nominal  concentration  of  0.3 mg/J,  for 96  hours. These  static   tests were
performed at  20°C.   Significant accumulation  of RDX  was  not  reported  In  any
of  these  species.  Four-day BCF of  3.0  and 1.6 were found In worms and water
fleas,  respectively.  In  bluegllls,  the  BCFs  values were 1.9  In  muscle
tissue  and  3.1  In  the viscera.   These values  are  slightly  less than  the
equilibrium  BCF  values of 4-5 1n  muscle and  9-10  In  viscera reported  by
Bentley et al. (1979) for  bluegllls.
    Bloaccumulatlon  of  RDX  In  fish  was  studied  by  Bentley et al.  (1979).
Groups  of 65  blueglll,  Lepomls  macrochlrus.  65  channel   catfish,  Ictalurus
5940H                                -17-                             07/28/89

-------
pynctatus.  and  130  fathead minnows,  Pimephales  promelas.  were exposed  to
t4C-RDX  under  flowthrbugh  condlttons  at mean  measured  concentrations  of
0,  0.014 and  1.0 ing/^  for 28  days.  A  14-day depuration period  followed
exposure.  Water was kept  at  a constant 18°C.  Mortality was  unusually high
(22-261)  In bluegill and  minnows  exposed to either concentration of ROX, but
the  cause could not  be  determined.   Exposed catfish  and  controls  of  all
species   were   unaffected.   Recovery  of   administered  radioactivity  was
complete  (99-1011).    Accumulation -and  elimination  of  "C   residues  was
directly  proportional  to  the   concentration  of  '4C-RDX  In  the  water.
Equilibrium between  the  rates of accumulation and  elimination was  reached
between  14  and  21  days in most cases, depending  on the tissue  and species  in
question.   RDX  did  not   accumulate  significantly  in   any  of  the  species
tested.   Equilibrium  BCFs  were =4-5  1n  the  muscle of fish  exposed  to 0.014
mg/^,  and  3-4  1n  the  muscle  of  those  exposed  to  1.0  mg/^.    In  the
viscera,  BCFs  ranged  from 6-11  at 0.014 mg/^,  and 3-9 at 1.0 mg/^.   The
results  regarding elimination  of  radioactivity during the 14  days  following
exposure  were   not  as  consistent.   Although  almost  all  radioactivity  was
eliminated from the muscle and viscera of bluegills  exposed to  0.014  mg/^,
almost  none was eliminated  from  bluegllls  exposed  to  1 mg/^.  In  fish  of
other species exposed to 1  mg/^,  70-87% was eliminated.
4.1.3.   Effects On Flora.
    4.1.3.1.   Toxidty -- Bentley  et  al.   (1979)   investigated  the  acute
toxicity  of RDX to  several species of algae  in  static  tests.   RDX was dried
and  mixed  with  acetone  in  these  studies.   Test  species   Included  the
blue-green  algae,  Microcvstis  aeruqinosa and  Anabeana flos-aquar.  the green
alga,  Selenastrum capricornututn.   and  the  diatom,   Navlcula  pelliculosa.


5940H                                -18-                             06/20/89

-------
Chlorophyll  a levels  were  monitored in all four  species.   Cell  density  was
also recorded by  measurement  of optical density In A.  flos-aquar and by cell
counts for  the  other  three  species.   The  96-hour EC50  values  for  changes
In  chlorophyll   a  content and  cell  density  were >32  mg/4,   the  highest
nominal exposure  level,  in all  four species.   S.  caprlcornututn  appeared  to
be more  sensitive to  RDX  than  the  other species; at 32 mg/4t  cell  density
was reduced 38%  In  this species but only  14-18%  in the other  species.   The
decrease  was  also  greater than  In-other  species at  lower  concentrations.
Percent reduction in  chlorophyll  a  content was greater In  this  species than
others  at 0.32-10  mg/^  but  was  similar  in  all   four  species  at 32  mg/^
(17-23% decrease).
    4.1.3.2.   BIOCONCENTRATION  --  RDX   labelled  with    "C  was  used  to
perform  an  exploratory   bioconcentration  test   in  the  green  alga,   S.
capricornutum.   (Liu et  al.,   1984).   The  algae   were  exposed to  a  nominal
concentration of  0.3 mg/^  of ROX  for  96 hours under  static  conditions  at
24°C.   Relatively  large   amounts  of  radioactivity  were  recovered   in  the
tissues of  the  algae.   The  BCF  was  123.0, which  Is  much  higher than  the
values reported for fish and invertebrates in the  same study (1.6-3.1).
4.1.4.   Effects  On  Bacteria.    Pertinent  data   regarding  the  effects  of
exposure  of aquatic  bacteria   to  RDX  were  not   located  in  the  available
literature cited  in Appendix A.
4.2.   TERRESTRIAL TOXICOLOGY
4.2.1.   Effects On Fauna.  Pertinent data regarding the  effects  of exposure
of  terrestrial  fauna  to  RDX  were  not  located  in the available literature
cited in Appendix A.
5940H
-19-
06/20/89

-------
4.2.2.   Effects On Flora.  Pertinent data  regarding  the  effects of exposure
of  terrestrial  flora  to  RDX were  not located  In the available  literature
cited 1n Appendix A.
4.3.   FIELD STUDIES
    Pertinent data  regarding the effects  of RDX  on  flora and  fauna  In  the
field were not located In the available literature cited In Appendix A.
4.4.   AQUATIC RISK ASSESSMENT
    The lack of an  adequate  quantity  of pertinent  data regarding the effects
of exposure of aquatic fauna  and  flora  to  RDX prevented the development of a
freshwater criterion by the method  of  U.S.  EPA  (1986a,b).  Available data are
displayed  In  Figure  4-1.   The  lowest   LC,Q  reported   was  3.8  mg/l  In
7-day-old  fathead  minnow fry.   The  lowest  level   at which  effects  were
reported  In  a  chronic study  was  4.8  mg/l  In  0.  Magna.   Additional  data
required  for  the  development of  a  freshwater criterion Include  the results
of acute assays with a nonarthropod and nonchordate  species and an Insect or
species  from a  phylum  not   previously  represented,  another  chronic  study
using either  a  fish or an  Invertebrate, an assay In  which  an  aquatic plant
species Is exposed  to  measured  concentrations of  RDX  and  an estimate of the
maximum permissible tissue concentration In wildlife.
    No data  were  located regarding the effects  of exposure  of marine fauna
and flora to RDX.   Acute  studies  with  representatives from eight families of
marine  fauna  and at  least  three chronic   studies  and one  bloconcentratlon
study with marine fauna and  flora are  needed In  order to  develop a saltwater
criterion.
4.5.   SUMMARY
    Data  on  the  toxlclty of  RDX  to  aquatic organisms  were  obtained  from
studies by Bentley  et  al. (1979) and Liu et  al.  (1984).   RDX was  more toxic

5940H                                -20-                              07/28/89

-------
TEST TYPE
Family
#1
Chordate (Salmonid-fish)
12
Chordate (warmwater fish)
13
Chordate (fish or amphibian)
#4
Crustacean (planktonic)
#5
Crustacean (benthic)
16
Insectan
#7
non-Arthropod/ -Chordate
18
New Insectan or phylum
representative
#9
algae
#10
Vascular plant
GMAVa
(mg/L)
6.4
-6.75
5.56
38.73
100
38.73
NA
KA
32
NA
GMCV*
(mg/L)
NA
NA
4.35
3.25
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BCFa
NA
10
11
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
 *NA-Not Available
                                 FIGURE 4-1
Freshwater Aquatk Life  From Exposure to
                                       RDX.
                                                                       of
5940H
                                   -21-
                                                                  07/28/89

-------
to  fish   (96-hour  LCSO   »   4.1-6.4  mg/^)   than   Invertebrates   (48-hour
EC!Q  *   >100   mg/4)   or  algae   (96-hour   EC™  -   >32  mg/£)   in   acute
static  toxkity  tests.   The  results  of  flowthrough  toxiclty  tests  1n
bluegill and fathead minnow were similar to those of static  tests  (96-hour
LC50  -   6.6-7.6   mg/*);   however,  the  toxiclty  of  RDX  to  catfish  was
reduced   slightly  under   flowthrough  conditions   (96-hour   LC50   -   13
mg/^).   The most  sensitive  life  stage of  fathead  minnows  exposed  to ROX
was  7-day-old  fry  (96-hour  LC50 "*«  3.8  mg/^),  followed   in   order  by
60-day-old  fry,  30-day-old fry,  1-hour-old  fry and  eggs.   Chronic exposure
to  .>4-8  nig/^ of  RDX  produced  a  transitory  decrease  In daphnid  reproduc-
tion.    Although   decreases   were   reported   in  the  survival  and  percent
emergence of  midges exposed  to RDX  at  1.3-21  mg/l,  these  effects did  not
appear  to be exposure-related.   Fathead  minnows chronically  exposed  to 6.3
mg/^  of  RDX  had  reduced  survival  during  the  first  60   days   of  the
experiment.   RDX   did   not  accumulate  significantly  in  the  tissues  of
Invertebrates or fish;  however, a 4-day BCF of 123 was calculated in algae.
5940H                                -22-                             06/20/89

-------
                             5.  PHARMACOKINETICS
5.1.   ABSORPTION
    Schneider  et  al.  (1977)  administered  a  SO  rag/kg  dose  of  14C-RDX
dissolved In DMSO by  gavage  to 10  adult Sprague-Oawley rats (presumably both
males  and  females)   and  collected  urine,  feces  and  expired  1*CO_   for  4
days.    The   rats   were   then   sacrificed  to   estimate   whole   carcass
radioactivity.  Fecal  radioactivity acounted  for  <3%  of  the  administered
dose,  while  urinary  radioactivity and-  expired'  14CO   accounted  for  34%
and  43%,  respectively.  Radioactivity  In  the carcass  accounted for  10% of
the   administered   dose.     Overall  recovery   accounted  for   90%   of  the
administered radioactivity.   These  data suggest  that  RDX and Us radioactive
metabolites  produced  1n  the  gut  are  almost  completely  absorbed  from  the
gastrointestinal tract of rats.
    In  rats  given  a 100 ing/kg  oral  dose of coarse granular RDX as  a slurry
1n  Isotonlc  saline  and sampled at  several  Intervals  within 24 hours, levels
of  RDX  In   serum  rose  to  2.09  ug/mi  within  4   hours  and  peaked at  3.0
yg/mi  at 24  hours  (Schneider et  al.,  1977).   In  rats  similarly treated
with  a  finely powdered sample  In  saline at 50  tug/kg,  24-hour plasma levels
reached  4.7 ^g/mt,  demonstrating  the  effect of  particle  size on  rate of
absorption from an orally administered  suspension.
    In  female  miniature  swine  treated  similarly  with   100   mg/kg  finely
powdered  RDX  In  saline, serum RDX  concentration  Increased for  the first hour
to  =1.7  vg/mB.,  plateaued  for  the next  5  hours  and   Increased  notably
from   the  sixth   to   the   24th   hour  to  -4.7  ug/mi,   suggesting  that
gastrointestinal absorption   In miniature  swine  was  similar  to  that  In  the
rat.
5940H                                -23-                             07/28/89

-------
    MacPhail  et al.  (1985)  reported  that .RDX was absorbed  Into blood within
1  hour of  oral  administration of  50 mg/kg  In  2X  carboxymethylcellulose  to
4-5 adult female  Sprague-Dawley  rats.   Levels 1n plasma  rose  rapidly In the
first hour but much slower over  the  next 23 hours.   Peak levels  appeared  to
occur at 24 hours.
    According to  Taylor  (1975),  RDX  Is absorbed from  the stomach  and  lungs
but  not  through  the  skin.   Further  Information  or  documentation  was  not
provided.
5.2.    DISTRIBUTION
    RDX  concentrations  In  tissues  from rats  and   miniature   swine  In  the
Schneider et  al.  (1977)  studies  described above are summarized In Table 5-1.
Highest  levels  were  located In  the  kidney;  however,  RDX  did   not  appear  to
accumulate In a specific organ.   Schneider and Andersen (1975) reported that
treatment of rats with slurries of RDX at 500 or 50 mg/kg by intraperitoneal
administration  or at  100  mg/kg  by  gavage  resulted 1n  the same  pattern  of
tissue distribution with  the  levels  in the tissues  proportional  to the dose
administered.
    MacPhail et al. (1985) reported  that concentrations of  RDX  in the brains
of  adult  female  Sprague-Dawley  rats  peaked  within   24  hours   after  oral
administration  of 50  mg/kg  In  carboxymethylcellulose.   The brain  level  of
RDX  then decreased and was not  detectable  72  hours after treatment.  Plasma
levels plateaued  8 hours after dosing and remained  relatively  steady for the
next  16  hours;  they  began to fall  and  were  almost  undetectable  by 3 days
after dosing.
    MacPhail  et  al.   (1985)  administered  RDX  in  carboxymethylcellulose  to
adult (probably male)  Sprague-Dawley rats (10/group) at concentrations of 1,
3  and  10 mg/kg for 30  days  and  measured  RDX concentrations  in plasma and
5940H                                -24-                             06/20/89

-------


















VI
Ol
VI
M
,»
^m

^
1

C
c
X
- 0
1 or.
u o
JO *•*
i- a
•
vt
•fl


VI
c
o
IB

C
4)
U
C
o
o



































II

1- OS
a a

41 -~
C O>
•o v.
.- Ol
^ a.



^
«i tr
.,- O!
-i a.






c — •
— Ol

\- Ol
o a.



— ^.
u Ol
Is
—




s
I/I

^_
OL

^
C
Ol ••"*
£ Wl
1^ 5 L.
O U 3
3 0
41 ul £
E <0 — •

l~x


01 Ol
t/l Jtf
e -v
o en
E




Ol
w
O
ac
L.


ai 3
 z








VI
01 =
u *B
4> 1-
aw




i

in
•w
CO

£

^D
*
•H
^

^



fs.
*
^^
•fi

a>
CM

«
CM

O
in
CM



•J3
(M •—
4H Ol
00 X.
• Ol
<•", 3,


VI
3
O


in

\o

Ol

o>
E
O
in
01

o
1 —

i. .-
e u
•- a.
0
^
Li.

91


,,
Ol
"^
1)
a

Qt
^|

^ ^
fi a.
oe 

0
^i
CO
CM

O
o


«


CO
m
CO

m




vD

O

^
ro


"",
O
«
CM



V
^3 j.^i
O >»
•H 01
•- a

•~



VI
L.
3
O


CM

cx
V
t

in
Oi
c
a
i •-

i. •-
^ *
— a.

CM
^^
cc
z


^
01
^
IB
f^
1
01

•V ifl
«J V
m a.
oe 
E
O
—



Ol
Ol
13
«
Ol

o


1*.






4>
1.
3
V -w
4l 'B
e —
•- c

































































f>ht
r»«
2
,
•S
jj
Ol

t.
Oi T3
T) 41
s >.
C O
J£ CL
u 0>
fcO W


41 O
u Z
3 H
O

-------
whole  brain at  15  and  30  days.   Results  showed  that  after  15  days  of
treatment, RDX was not  detectable  In  the  plasma  or  brain of animals  1n the 1
and  3  mg/kg treatment  groups;  It  was detectable In  the plasma of  only  one
rat  and  In  the  brain  of  two rats  In  the highest  dosage group.   After  30
days, RDX was  detected  only  1n the brains  of two rats at  the  highest  dosage
level.   The group  mean  brain  concentration for  this  dose  group  was  0.27
pg/gm; there  was no  evidence of  Increwed  concentration  In the  brain  with
continued duration of treatment.
    Guo  et  al.  (1985)  administered  an  unspecified dose  of  3H-RDX to  male
mice (number and strain not  given)  by gavage  or  Intravenous Injection  before
the mice were  sacrificed  and  3H-ROX  concentrations  In  several  organs,  blood,
urine  and  feces  were  measured.    Distribution  was  rapid following  either
route  of administration.   After  Intravenous  administration, tissue concen-
trations  were  highest  In lung,  followed  by heart,  liver,  kidney,  brain,
spleen,  testls, adipose tissue and  muscle  (In order  of decreasing concentra-
tion); after  gavage  administration,  tissue  concentrations  were  highest  In
liver, followed  by kidney,  muscle,  lung,  spleen,  heart,  brain,  testls  and
adipose  tissue (In order  of  decreasing concentration).   Tissue  levels  In  all
mice decreased  significantly 1n 12-24 hours.  After gavage  treatment,  organ
radioactivity  decreased to  almost  background levels  In seven  days.   There
appeared to be no accumulation of RDX In  any organ of the mouse.
    Schneider  et  al.  (1978)  exposed Sprague-Dawley  rats  of  both  sexes  to
RDX-saturated  drinking water  (50-70  ug/m!)  for  <90  days  and  sacrificed
the rats  In groups of  six at 30,  60 and  90 days  to measure tissue concentra-
tions  of the  chemical.  There appeared  to be no RDX  accumulation In  any of
the  tissues studied,   Including  heart,   brain,  liver,  kidney, stomach  and
colon.
5940H                                -26-                             07/28/89

-------
5.3.   METABOLISM
    In  the  Schneider  et  al.   (1977)  rat  study with  a  50  mg/kg  dose  of
[14C]-RDX  (see  Section  5.1),  expiration  of  14CO_ accounted  for  43%  of
the administered  radioactivity.   Urinary radioactivity accounted  for  34% of
the dose.  On  the basis  of  gas  chromatographlc  analysis  of the urine of rats
treated   orally  with   100   mg/kg,   the   Investigators   estimated   that
unmetabollzed  RDX accounted  for  only  3.6%  of  the  total  urinary  radioac-
tivity.   Levels  of  radioactivity much  1n excess of actual ROX  levels  were
also  measured  1n the  liver,  prompting  the  Investigators  to  state  that  RDX
metabolites  were  present   1n   the   liver.    They  concluded   that  extensive
metabolism of  RDX occurred  In the liver.   Schneider  et  al.  (1977) cited work
Indicating  that a  single   50  mg/kg  dose  of RDX  stimulated  persistent  SER
proliferation   In  the   liver   of   rats   (French et al.,   1976)   and  that
phenobarbltal,  a  known  liver mlcrosomal  MFO-lnducer,  Increased the  rate of
ROX metabolism In  the  rat  (Conney,  1967).  The  Investigators  concluded that
RDX was extensively metabolized 1n the liver.
    When  rats   were  treated with  [14C]-RDX-saturated water   for  1  week  (5
rats)  or  13 weeks (6  rats  of  both  sexes),  30-50%  of the  radioactivity  was
recovered  as   exhaled  14C02.  25-35% was  found  In   the  urine  and  4-5%  In
the   feces.    Of  the   total   urinary   radioactivity,   unmetabollzed   RDX
contributed  only  3-5%,  while  the  remainder  was  due   to  unidentified
metabolites (Schneider et al.,  1978).
5.4.   EXCRETION
    In  the  Schneider  et   al.  (1977)  rat  study  (see  Section  5.1.),  the
Investigators  reported   that  expired  14CO_   accounted  for  43% of  an  oral
50  mg/kg  dose  of  14C-RDX.   Expiration  of 14CO   remained  fairly  linear
through  the  first   3  days after   treatment  before  stabilizing.   Urinary
5940H                                -27-                             07/28/89

-------
radioactivity accounted for 34% of  the  dose  and  remained fairly linear for 2
days,  Urinary  excretion   was  nearly   complete  by  the  third  day.   Fecal
excretion accounted for <3% of the administered radioactivity.
    In  the  gavage study  where  3H-RDX  was  administered to mice  (Guo,  1985)
(see  Section 5.2),  more  radioactivity was  eliminated  through  urine  than
feces  after  gavage  administration,  and  64.82%  of   the  radioactivity  was
eliminated through the urine and feces within 24 hours  of administration.
5.5.   SUMHARY
    Balance  experiments   with  14C-ROX  1n  rats  suggest  that absorption  of
radioactivity from  the gastrointestinal tract 1s  nearly complete (Schneider
et  al.,  1977).    Plasma  levels  of  RDX   In  rats   and   miniature  swine
administered  RDX  by  gavage plateaued after an Initial  rise  and did  not  peak
until  24 hours after  treatment  (Schneider  et  al.,  1977),   Indicating  that
gastrointestinal  absorption   Is   prolonged.    In  rats  treated  with   RDX
suspended In  saline, higher plasma  levels  were achieved with a 50 mg/kg dose
of  a  finely  powdered sample  compared with  a  100  mg/kg dose  of  a  coarse
granular  sample,  demonstrating the  effect  of particle  size  on  gastrointes-
tinal  absorption  (Schneider  et al.,  1977).   RDX Is reported  to  be  absorbed
from the stomach and lung but not through the skin  (Taylor,  1975).
    Distribution experiments In rats  (Schneider  et  al., 1977, 1978;  MacPhall
et  al.,  1985), miniature swine   (Schneider  et  al., 1977) and mice  (Guo  et
al., 1985)  Indicate  that  distribution  Is rapid  following oral or  Intravenous
administration.  Highest  levels  of  RDX were  found  In  the kidney  of  rats  and
miniature swine  (Schneider et al.,  1977}  and In the  lung,  liver  and kidney
of mice  (Guo et  al., 1985).  Continued oral  exposure  of rats did not result
In  accumulation  of  RDX  In any tissue  (Schneider  et  al., 1978;  MacPhall  et
al., 1985).

5940H                                -28-                             07/28/89

-------
    RDX appears  to be  extensively  metabo.11 zed and excreted  as  Indicated by
recovery of  43% of an  oral  dose of  I4C-RDX  as  '4C02  In  rats  (Schneider
et al., 1977).   Urinary radioactivity accounted for 341 of the dose and only
3.6% of the  urinary  radioactivity  constituted unmetaboltzed  compound.   The
liver  appears  to  be  the  principal  site  of  metabolism (Schneider  et  al.,
1977).  N1th1n  4 days  of  treatment,  excretion accounted  for  »80% of  the
administered dose.
 5940H                                 -29-                             06/20/89

-------
radioactivity accounted for 34X of  the dose  and  remained  fairly linear for 2
days.  Urinary  excretion   was  nearly  complete  by  the  third  day.   Fecal
excretion accounted for <3X of the administered radioactivity.
    In  the  gavage study  where  3H-RDX was  administered  to mice  (Quo,  1985)
(see  Section  5.2),  more  radioactivity  was  eliminated  through  urine  than
feces  after  gavage  administration,  and  64.82%  of   the  radioactivity  was
eliminated through the urine and feces within 24 hours of  administration.
5.5.   SUMMARY
    Balance  experiments  with  14C-RDX  1n   rats  suggest  that  absorption  of
radioactivity  from  the gastrointestinal  tract Is  nearly  complete (Schneider
et  al.,  1977).    Plasma  levels  of  RDX   1n  rats   and   miniature  swine
administered  RDX  by  gavage plateaued after an Initial rise  and did  not  peak
until  24 hours after  treatment  (Schneider  et  al.,  1977),  Indicating  that
gastrointestinal  absorption   1s   prolonged.    In  rats  treated with   RDX
suspended 1n  saline, higher plasma  levels  were achieved with a 50 mg/kg dose
of  a  finely  powdered  sample  compared with  a  100  mg/kg dose  of  a  coarse
granular  sample,  demonstrating the  effect  of particle size on  gastrointes-
tinal  absorption  (Schneider  et al.,  1977).   RDX 1s reported  to  be  absorbed
from the stomach and lung but not through the skin (Taylor,  1975).
    Distribution  experiments  In rats  (Schneider  et  al., 1977,  1978;  MacPhall
et  al.,  1985), miniature swine  (Schneider  et al., 1977) and mice  (Quo  et
al., 1985)  Indicate  that  distribution  Is rapid following  oral  or  Intravenous
administration.   Highest  levels of  RDX were  found  In  the kidney  of  rats  and
miniature swine  (Schneider et al.,  1977)  and In the  lung,  liver and kidney
of  mice  (Guo et al.,  1985).  Continued oral  exposure  of  rats  did not result
In  accumulation  of  RDX  In any tissue  (Schneider  et  al., 1978;  MacPhall  et
al., 1985).
5940H
-30-
06/20/89

-------
workers  with  regard  to  any  parameter  tested.  The  authors  concluded  that
there  was  no  evidence for  adverse  health  effects among  workers with  RDX
exposures of up to 1.57 mg/m3 or an average of 0.28 mg/m3.
6.1.2.   Oral Exposures.
    6.1.2.1.   SUBCHRONIC —  Schneider  et  al.  (1978)  provided RDX-saturated
drinking  water  (50-70  vg/mi)  ad  libitum  for  90 days  to  a  group of  18
male  and  female  Sprague-Dawley  rats  to  study  tissue  distribution  during
subchronlc   exposure.   The   total  dally   dose* was   estimated   by   the
Investigators  to  be 5-8 mg/kg.   A  control  group of 10 male  and female rats
received distilled  water.   At  30-day  Intervals,  groups of  six  animals  were
sacrificed and levels of RDX  In selected  tissues were measured.   No signs of
toxlclty were  observed during  the  study  and the  growth  of  treated rats  was
similar  to that of the controls.  At necropsy, all organs appeared normal.
    Schneider  et al.  (1978)  gave  20  mg  RDX/kg/day  In  an  Isotonlc  saline
slurry to  a group of  30  male and female Sprague-Dawley rats by gavage for 90
days  to  study distribution during  subchronlc  treatment.  Ten  control  rats
from  both  genders received  Isotonlc saline by  gavage.  While  eight  of  the
treated  rats  died between  days  42  and  77,  the deaths appeared  to  be due to
exacerbation of  an  underlying  chronic  respiratory disease rather  than as  a
direct result  of  the  toxlclty  of ROX.  Treated  rats  exhibited no CNS signs.
No deaths occurred In the control group.
    von  Oettlngen  et  al.  (1949) conducted  two  studies to measure  the  sub-
chronic  toxlclty  of dietary  RDX 1n rats.   A  group of 45 rats  (age,  strain
and  gender  not   reported)  were divided  Into  three   treatment  groups  and
received  diets  containing  RDX  concentrations adjusted  to provide dosages of
15,  50  or 100  mg/kg/day  for  10  weeks;   the  rats  were then  sacrificed.
5940H                                -31-                             07/28/89

-------
Mortality, growth and clinical  observations  were recorded,  but hematologlcal
or hlstologlcal observations  were  not.   No control animals were  reported In
this study.   While  no animals  In  the  lowest dose group died,  there  was  60%
and  87%  mortality 1n the  middle- and  high-dose groups, respectively.   The
only abnormality  observed  In  the  dead animals  was  congestion of  the  lungs
and  gastrointestinal  tract.   According  to  the  authors,  the  rats   that
received  15  mg/kg/day  had a  "normal" -weight  Increase during  the  time  of
treatment  while  the  rats  at  the  two  higher  dosages  lost  weight  rapidly
during  the first three  weeks  of  exposure;   their  weights  then  fluctuated
below  Initial  weight  levels  until  the  final  week  of the  study when  the
weight of  the animals  at  the  highest  dose  was  the  same as  It  was at  the
beginning  of  the  treatment.   The rats at  the lowest  dosage exhibited normal
behavior while  those at the  higher  dose levels  were  Irritable,  vicious  and
suffered clonlc-tonlc convulsions.
    For the second study,  80  rats,  In  treatment  groups of  20, received  diets
containing RDX  adjusted  to provide dosages of 0,  15,  25 or  50 mg/kg/day  for
12 weeks.   Behavior, weight,  mortality  and  blood chemistry  parameters  were
recorded  and  surviving  rats  were  sacrificed 5  days  after cessation of  the
treatment  for  Mstopathologlc  examination  of  unspecified  tissues.    All
control  rats  and  19/20   low-dose  rats  survived.   The death  of  the  one
low-dose  rat  was  probably not  due  to RDX exposure.   Forty per cent of  the
animals  In each  of  the two  high-dose  groups  died and autopsies of  these
animals  revealed  lung  and  gastrointestinal  tract  congestion.   Heights  of
animals In the  control  group  and 15  mg/kg dose  groups Increased In a similar
manner while weights of rats  1n the  two higher  dose groups decreased for  the
first  four  weeks  and then  Increased  to almost   the Initial weight  (50  mg/kg
group) or  higher  than  the  Initial  value  (25 mg/kg group).   Control  animals

5940H                                -32-                             07/28/89

-------
and those at  the  lowest dosage exhibited normal  behavior  while  those at the
two  higher  dose  groups  were   Irritable,   vicious   and   had  convulsions.
Behavior  of   survivors  returned  to  normal  during  the 5 nonexposure  days
before  sacrifice.   Blood  chemistry  patterns were  similar  In  all  groups.
Tissues of sacrificed rats had no significant abnormalities.
    A  13-week  study  of  the  effects of  orally  administered  RDX  on  F344
(Sprague-Oawley) rats was  conducted  by  Levlne  et al.  (1981).   Doses  of 10,
30,  100,  300  and  600  mg/kg/day  were "provided 'by  adjusting  the  concen-
tration of RDX  In  the diets fed  to  test animals  (10/sex/group)  for  90 days.
A control group of  30 rats/sex received no  RDX  In  their  feed.  Animals were
observed  for mortality,  toxic   signs,  body  weight,   food consumption  and
clinical chemistry.   All  rats  were necropsled at death or at  the conclusion
of  the study;  major  organs were  weighed  and about  25 selected  organs and
tissues  were  prepared   for  microscopic  examination.  Results  showed  that
doses  >100  mg/kg/day  resulted  1n  mortality.   Irritability,  reduced  food
consumption  and  reduced   body   weight  gain.    Mean  survival   times  were
Inveresly  related  to dose  with  no  sex differences  noted.   Rats that were
given  10 mg/kg/day had  at least  a 10% reduction 1n serum trlglycerlde levels
and the  magnitude  of this  effect was dose-related.   Females  at  this dosage
had  significant leukocytosls  and  males had  a  6% reduction  In mean  body
weight  gain  compared  with  controls.   Hales   that   received  30  mg/kg/day
exhibited a  13% reduction  In body weight gain  although food  consumption was
comparable  with  that  of  controls.   Animals  that  received  RDX   had  no
histopathologlcal lesions at any dose level.
    NacPhall  et al.  (1985)  studied the  behavioral   effects of  RDX  when
administered  to adult Sprague-Dawley rats  for  30 days.   Dosages  of  0,  1,  3
and 10 mg/kg/day of RDX suspended In a  2% solution of carboxymethylcellulose

5940H                                 -33-                             07/28/89

-------
were given  to groups  of  24-72 male  or female  rats  by gavage  for  30 days.
Behavior  and  motor  activity  tests  were  given  the  day  before  the  Initial
dose,  then  on  days   16   and  31.    There  was  no  evidence  of  behavior
modification that was due to ROX administration.
    A  study  of  the subchronlc effects  of  RDX In the diets of  F344  rats  and
B6C3F1 mice was conducted by  Cholakts  et  al.  (1980).   Dietary concentrations
were adjusted  to  provide dosages  of  0.-10,  14.  20,  28 and  40 mg/kg/day In
treatment groups of  10 males and  10 females  of  each  species. Animals  were 5
weeks  of  age at the  beginning of the  study.   Dosages  were  adjusted  on  the
basis  of weekly food  consumption  and body  weight measurements.   The compound
was given for 90 days  during  which the animals were observed dally for signs
of  toxldty,  behavior  changes  and other  abnormalities.   Clinical  pathology
measurements  were  taken  from selected animals  at selected  Intervals.   All
animals  that  died before  the  conclusion  of  the  study  were  necropsled.
Animals  that  survived  the  study  were  sacrificed  and necropsled on day  90.
Major  organs were  weighed and  a  comprehensive set  of organs and tissues from
control  and  high-dose  rats  were  subjected  to  microscopic  examination.
Tissues  from mice were not  examined  microscopically.   The  only consistent
lexicological  effect   seen  In  the rat  study was  a decrease  In mean  body
weights compared with  those of controls In the rats given 40 mg/kg/day.  The
decrease  appeared  to  be  dose-related  and was  statistically  significant  In
the  male  rats;  It was  also noted In  the  females.  The  food consumption  of
male rats at  the high-dose  level  was  lower than  that of controls for several
weeks  during  the  study.  There was  one death In  the-hlgh  dose group  but It
did  not  appear  to  be related  to  RDX administration.  No  other  behavioral or
5940H                                -34-                             07/28/89

-------
pharmacological signs  were observed  In  the high-dose  rats.   Rats  given  28
mg/kg/day RDX apparently were not affected by the treatment.
    Cholakls  et  al.  (1980)  reported no  differences  In  the  treated  mice
compared  with  controls  with   respect   to  change   In  body  weight,  food
consumption,  behavior  and  clinical   pathology;   therefore,  the  study  was
repeated at  higher doses,  using treatment groups of  10 male and  12 female
B3C3F1  mice.   The  mice were  5 weeks  old at  th&  beginning of the study.
Diets were  adjusted to provide  dosages  of 0,  40, 60  or 80  mg/kg/day for  2
weeks followed  by  0,  320,  160  or  80 mg/kg/day,  respectively,  for  11 weeks
(TWA  doses  of  0,  277,  145  and 80  mg/kg/day for  91  days).   Treated mice  of
both  sexes  exhibited  a dose-related  Increase  In  mean  absolute  and  relative
liver  weights   that were  statistically  significant  at  277 mg/kg/day.   A
dose-related  but  statistically  nonsignificant  Increase  In  absolute  and
relative  kidney  weight  was  reported In  treated male mice.   Nice  at  the
highest dose had greater  mortality than controls  (27  and  0%, respectively);
deaths occurred during  the llth  week  of  the  study except for  one female that
died  during week 6.   Hale mice at  the highest  dosage  became  hyperactive and
nervous  during  weeks   7-8.  Hlstopathologlcal   lesions   observed   In  the
high-dose  group  restricted  to  the  males   possibly  attributable  to  RDX
Included mild  focal myocardlal  degeneration,  hepatocellular  vacuollzatlon,
Increased hepatocellular karyomegaly and mild tubular nephrosls.
    According  to  von  Oettlngen  et al.  (1949),   seven  female dogs  (age  and
breed not given) treated with  50 mg RDX/kg/day  In a  pellet of moistened food
6  days  a week  for 6  weeks  (expanded  dosage  42.9  mg/kg/day)  exhibited  no
significant changes  In blood  chemistry.   They  became  excited and  Irritable
several hours  after the  first dose  and  as  exposure continued,  they became
hyperactive and progressively convulsive.  While five control  dogs maintained
5940H
-35-
07/28/89

-------
a  fairly  constant weight  for  the duration  of  the study, treated  dogs lost
weight  after  the first  week.   Although  their  food  consumption  was  not
affected,  treated dogs  showed  a 2OX weight loss  at  the  end  of the 6 weeks.
One treated dog died, but  no  deaths  were noted  among five control dogs.  The
six  surviving  treated dogs  were  sacrificed  and  necropsled.   All  exhibited
dlstentlon  of  mesenterlc   blood  vessels   and   slight  congestion  of  small
Intestine mucous membranes.
    Hart  (1974} studied  the  effects  of oral administration of  RDX  In beagle
dogs {three males  and three females/dose group) for  90 days.   Ooses  of 0.1,
1  and  10  mg/kg/day were given  In  small  portions of moist dog  food,  and the
dogs were  observed dally for changes  In appearance, behavior  and  for  signs
of  toxIcHy.   Dogs   were  weighed  weekly,   and  hematologlcal,   clinical
biochemistry   and  urlnalysls   parameters   were  measured   regularly.    At
termination,  the   dogs  were  sacrificed  and necropsled.   Major  organs  were
weighed  and subjected  to  hlstopathologlcal  examination.   There were  some
cases  of  nausea  and  vomiting during the  first  2 weeks of the  study,  but  no
other  toxic  signs or changes  In body weight were observed.   One  animal  In
the  1   mg/kg/day   dose-group  died  for  reasons apparently  not  related  to
exposure.  Clinical pathology  parameters, necropsies  and  microscopic  studies
showed  no  effects that  were  due to  RDX administration.   The  value  of this
study  1s questionable because of the small number of dogs  that were treated.
    Martin  and Hart  (1974)  conducted a  study   to determine the subchronlc
effects of  RDX when  administered orally to  groups  of cynomolgus  monkeys for
90  days.   Three monkeys/sex/treatment group were  given  doses  of 0,  0.1,  1
and  10  mg/kg/day  suspended  In  1%  methylcellulose  by  oral  Intubation.
Monkeys  were  monitored  dally  for  mortality,   toxic  signs   and  changes  In
appearance  and behavior.   Weighings  were  conducted  weekly and laboratory
5940H                                -36-                             07/28/89

-------
tests,  Including  ophthalmologlcal  examination, hematology,  blood  chemistry,
urlnanalysls  and  liver   function,  were  made  at  regular  Intervals.   All
surviving  animals   were  sacrificed  and   necropsled   after  90   days   of
treatment.   Hlstopathologlcal  examination  was  not  performed.   Weight  loss
occurred  1n  all  groups.  Including  the control group, within  the  first week.
The Investigators attributed the weight loss  to  the  stress  of dally handling
and manipulation  for  gavage admlnlstatlen.   The  Vnvestlgators  reported  that
treated monkeys  appeared not to regain  lost weight as rapidly as  controls,
suggesting  an effect  of RDX.   The  data  Indicated considerable  Individual
variation  and no  conclusion  can   be  drawn.  Of  monkeys  that  received  10
mg/kg/day,  five  had  disturbances   of  the  central  nervous   system  Involving
convulsions;   four  survived and   recovered,  but  one  was  euthanized.   An
Increase  In  the  amount  of  Iron-positive  material   In  liver   cord  cell
cytoplasm  was reported  In  high-dose monkeys.   The authors  were  unable  to
explain  the  toxlcologlcal significance of  this  observation.  There  were  no
effects  on  the  other  parameters   monitored  that  were  attributed  to  RDX.
Because  the  number  of  monkeys  used  1n  the study was  small,  statistical
significance was not performed.
    6.1.2.2.   CHRONIC — A 2-year  feeding study of RDX with 86C3F1  mice was
conducted  by L1sh  et al.  (1984).   Groups  of 85  male  and  85 female  mice
received  ROX  mixed with  feed at  concentatlons adjusted  to provide  dosages of
0, 1.5, 7.0,  35  and  175  mg/kg/day  for 105 weeks.   Because mortality was high
at  the  Initial   dosage   of  175 mg/kg/day,  this  dose was  reduced   to  100
mg/kg/day after  the first 10 weeks  of the study,  resulting  In a 1HA dose for
this group of 107 mg/kg/day.
    Dally observations for  mortality,  toxic signs  and  behavior  abnormalities
were  made.    Body  weights,  food consumption, ophthalmology, hematology  and

5940H                                -37-                             07/28/89

-------
blood chemistry  parameters  were  measured  regularly.  Palpations  for  masses
were  conducted  weekly.   Ten  mice/sex/treatment  group  were  sacrificed  at
weeks  26  and  53  and  all   animals  that  did  not  survive the  study  were
necropsled.  Surviving mice  were sacrificed and necropsled  at week 105-106,
1 day  following  the last administration  of  RDX.  Major  organs were weighed
and  selected  tissues  from some  animals  from each dose  group were  subjected
to   microscopic   examination.    A   moLe    comprehensive   hlstopathologlcal
examination was  performed on  mice  from  the control  and high-dose  groups.
Results  showed  that mice, at  dosage levels  >35.0 mg/kg/day,  had  Increased
mortality,  body  weight change,  food consumption  and hematology  parameters
that  were not  significantly different  from those  of  controls.   The  only
statistically  significant effect (p  value  not  reported)  noted  In  the  mice
that received 7.0 mg/kg/day was  hypercholesterolemla  In  the  females.   At the
35 mg/kg/day dosage,  males  had  significantly higher renal weights  (p value
not  reported)  and  an  Increased  Incidence  of testlcular  degeneration,  while
females  had  a  greater (not  significant)  Incidence  of  hepatomegaly compared
to controls.  Mice  that were exposed  to  the  highest  dosage had  significantly
(p value not  reported) reduced  body weight gain  over  the 2-year  period  as
well  as   Increased  kidney and  heart weights,  an Increased  number of  lung
hlstlocytes,  an  Increased   Incidence  of  hepatomegaly  and.  In  the  males,
Increased  Incidence  of   testlcular  degeneration  compared with   controls.
Although  the  Increase  In testlcular  degeneration  observed  at  35 and  107
mg/kg/day was not statistically  significant,  the  Investigators attributed  It
to RDX.
    Using  the   same   protocol   as   Ush   (1984),   Levlne  et  al.   (1984)
Investigated  the effects  of  dietary concentrations  of  RDX  on   344  rats.
Doses of  0, 0.3, 1.5,  8.0 and  40 mg/kg/day  were fed  to groups  of 75 male and
5940H
-38-
07/28/89

-------
75  female  rats  for  105 weeks.    No  effects  attributable  to RDX  admini-
stration  were  seen 1n  the  animals  that  received 0.3 mg/kg/day.   Hale rats
administered 1.5 mg/kg/day  had suppuratlve Inflammation of  the prostate and
Increased amounts of a  hemoslderln-llke pigment  In  the spleen.   Rats  of both
sexes  given 8.0 mg/kg/day  had body weights  that were -5%  lower  than  those
of  controls.    In  addition,  females  had  hepatomegaly  and  decreased  total
serum  protein  levels.   Rats at  the  highest  dose of RDX had a  statistically
significant higher  rate of  mortality  compared with  controls   (80% and 50%,
respectively},  as   well  as   reduced  body   weight  gains,   reduced   food
consumption,  hyperactlvlty,   signs  of   liver  and   kidney   damage  and  an
Increased Incidence of cataracts.
    Hart  (1976) conducted  a 2-year  study  to  determine the  effects of  diets
containing  fine  granular RDX  at  concentrations  adjusted to  provide  dosages
of  0,  1.0,  3.1 and  10  mg/kg/day on Sprague-Dawley  rats  (100  males  and 100
females/dose group).  Rats  were observed  dally for mortality and  weekly for
signs  of  toxic  or  pharmacologlc  effects and   changes  In  appearance  and
behavior.   The body weights  and food  consumption of  25  rats/treatment  group
were monitored.  Hematology,  blood chemistry and urlnalysls  parameters were
evaluated  at  regular  Intervals on  selected  rats.   Twenty  rats/dose  group
were sacrificed and  necropsled after  52  weeks.   All  rats that survived the
study were  sacrificed and  necropsled after 104 weeks  of treatment.  Selected
organs  were weighed  and  selected  tissues   were subjected  to  microscopic
examination.    A   more  comprehensive  hlstopathologlcal    examination   was
performed  on  rats  from  the  control  and  high-dose  groups.   Treated  rats
showed  no  apparent  differences,  compared  with  controls,   In any  of  the
parameters evaluated.
5940H
-39-
07/28/89

-------
6.1.3.   Other Relevant  Information.   The  acute  oral LD5Q  for RDX  1n  rats
was  determined  by  von  Oettlngen et   al.   (1949)   to  be  200  mg/kg  when
administered as  a  ^% suspension  In gum acacia.  RDX was administered  to 95
rats  (age,  sex and  strain not given)  by gavage 1n  doses  ranging from 25-400
mg/kg.  Host  deaths occured  <24  hours  after treatment.  Autopsies  revealed
moderate to severe congestion of the gastrointestinal tract  and lungs.
    The oral  LDrQ  for  RDX  In F344 rats- (combined  sexes) was  determined by
Cholakls et al.  (1980)  to be  118.1  mg/kg when administered  by gavage \n a 1%
aqueous  solution  of  methylcellulose.   The  response was  not  sex-related.
Signs of  toxlclty  In  exposed animals  Included gasping and  labored  breathing
and clonlc/tonlc  convulsions.
    Dllley  et al.  (1979)  determined  the  oral  L05Q  for  RDX 1n  Sprague-
Dawley  rats  to  be  71  mg/kg for  males,   and  approximately  that  value  In
females.  All 10 females  given 50 mg/kg survived,  while  1/10  given  75  mg/kg
survived.     Ten   male  and  10  female  animals  at  each  dose  level   were
administered ROX  In corn  oil  by gavage.   Signs of  toxldty Included tremors
and  convulsions.   The   acute  oral   LD5Q   In  Swiss-Webster  mice  was   also
determined  In this  study  using the same protocol.   For male  mice,  the  value
was 86 mg/kg; for  female  mice the  value could not be determined because 5/10
animals at every dose level died.
    The oral  L05Q for RDX  In  B6C3F1  mice  was determined by Cholakls el al.
(1980) to be 97.2,  58.9 and 80.3  mg/kg  for males, females and combined  sexes
when administered by gavage  In  an  aqueous  solution  of 1% methylcellulose and
1%  polysorbate  80.   Signs  of  toxldty   Included  labored   breathing  and
clonlc/tonlc convulsions.   The response appeared to  be  sex-related  although
the authors  stated that  overlapping  confidence  limits  do  not  support  this
5940H                                -40-                             07/28/89

-------
observation.   Spector   (1956)   lists  the  acute  oral  LD5Q  1n  mice  as  500
mg/kg; In cats, as 100 mg/kg.
    Schneider  et  al.  (1977)  noted  that the acute  oral  toxlclty of  RDX  was
dependent on  the  physical  form of the  test  sample.   Without  providing data,
these  Investigators  stated  that  the  oral  LD5Q of  RDX dissolved in  DMSO or
of  finely  powdered  RDX  suspended  1n   saline  was  =100 mg/kg  1n  Sprague-
Dawley rats.   Coarsely granular RDX suspended  In  saline,  however,  yielded an
oral L05Q of =300 mg/kg.
    The effects of acute  administration of RDX to  adult  Sprague-Dawley rats
on behavior was studied by  MacPhall et  al.  (1985).   Doses of  1,  12.5, 25 and
50 mg/kg  In 2% carboxymethylcellulose  were  given orally to  groups  of 24-72
male  or  female rats.   Behavior tests  were  conducted  2  hours later  and  the
next day.   Results showed  that motor  activity  decreased  with Increasing  RDX.
dose with  the lowest dose,  causing a >50% decrease  In  activity compared to
controls.  Activity levels were still  depressed 24 hours  after dosing.
    Burdette et al.  (1988)  studied the  effects  of oral administration of RDX
on seizure activity of male Long  Evans  rats.   ROX,  In 2% carboxymethylcellu-
lose,  was  administered to  groups of  10 rats  orally  at doses  ranging from
0-60  mg/kg,  and  the  animals  were  monitored  for  seizure activity   for  24
hours.  Plasma RDX  concentrations were  also monitored.   Results showed that
spontaneous seizures occurred  at  dosages of >10  mg/kg and  plasma concentra-
tions  of   3.1  pg/mi.   French  et al.   (1976)  studied the change  in  liver
and  kidney  morphology  in rats  {number, strain and sex not reported)  24, 48
and  120  hours after  oral  administration of  100  mg/kg RDX.   Changes  in  the
hepatocytes   Involving   mltochondrlal   swelling,   dilation   of   the   rough
endoplasmic  reticulum  and  the  presence of concentric membrane  arrays after

5940H                                -41-                             07/28/89

-------
24 hours were  noted.   These effects persisted through  the  120-hour  observa-
tion.   Proliferation  of  the SER  of  the  liver  had  begun by  48 hours  and
Increased  dramatically  by  120  hours.   The  effects of  RDX on  renal  tissue
were minimal and transient at this dose level.
    A  study of  the  acute  toxlclty  of  RDX  In  dogs  was reported  by  von
Oettlngen  et al.  (1949).  Dosages  of  5 mg/kg and  15 mg/kg suspended  In  10%
gum  acacia were  given  to  three  dogs -{age,  sex*  and  breed  not given)  by
stomach  tube and  physiological  parameters.   The dogs  were observed  for  240
minutes.   No  changes  In  any physiological  functions measured  (arterial  and
venous  blood   pressures,  respiratory  rate,   spinal  CSF  pressure and  urine
nitrate content) were observed.
    A  study designed to assess the dermal  toxlclty of  RDX  In  New  Zealand
albino  rabbits showed  that  a  single  application  of 2  g/kg  In  1%  carboxy-
methylcellulose caused  no  mortality,  no  clinical  signs  of  toxlclty and  a
small,  transient,  loss  of body  weight  In eight male and five female  animals
during a 14-day observation period  (Furedl-Machacek  et  al., 1987).
    Schneider  et al.  (1977)  gave RDX 100 mg/kg  In  an  Isotonlc  saline slurry
to ten  female  miniature swine  (21-60 kg)  by  gavage.   Four animals convulsed
12-24  hours after  dosing  and  two  died at  22 hours.   The lag  time  between
compound administration  and  onset  of convulsions In the  swine  Is comparable
with  the latent period  before  RDX  convulsions  In  humans  (Schneider  et  al.
(1977).
    Gleason et al.  (1969)  suggested  an  acute  fatal,  oral  dose of   RDX  1n
humans  as  ranging  from 5-500 mg/kg.  According to  Taylor  (1975), Industrial
workers   exposed   to   ROX  experienced  sudden   convulsions  or  loss   of
conslousness without  convulsions.   Some  workers  had  headaches, dizziness,
nausea  and vomiting  before losing  consciousness.   Return to  consciousness

5940H                                -42-                              07/28/89

-------
was  followed by  Intermittent  stupor,  weakness  and  nausea.   Recovery  was
essentially  complete.   There  were no  fatalatles  reported  In 915,000  man-
years of RDX exposure  In  U.S.  ordnance  plants  during World War II (HcConnell
and Fllnn, 1946).
    Kaplan  et  al.   (1965)   reported  case  studies  of  five workers  In  an
ammunitions  plant  exposed   to  RDX  through  Inadequate  ventilation   1n  the
workplace.   Possible  routes of  exposure  Included  Inhalation,  1ngest1on  and
skin  absorption.    Five  of  26 workers-engaged  1n  the operation  reported
convulsions  or  unconsciousness  (or both)  within 2  days  (2  cases) or  2 weeks
(1  case)  or unknown  periods of  time  (2  cases)  after the  beginning  of  RDX
exposure.   Premonitory signs  of  headache, dizziness  and vomiting were  not
always  seen.   Unconsciousness lasted  from several  minutes  to 24  hours  and
was  followed by  stupor,  dlsorlentatlon,   nausea,. vomiting  and weakness  for
varying  lengths of time.   Urlnanalysls  and CBC  counts were  normal.   After
supportive  treatment,  recovery was complete.   Two  men who  were subsequently
reexposed to the compound had the  Illness again.
    Human exposures  to RDX  have been reported.   A  3-year-old  child suffered
clonlc-tonlc  convulsions  after  Ingesting =1.23  g  of  the  compound.   He
recovered within several days (Woody et al., 1986).
    Cases of soldiers  who experienced  effects  from exposure to RDX have been
reported  by Merrill  (1968);  Hollander  and Colbach (1969)   and Stone  et  al.
(1969).   The  soldiers were  exposed  to  C-4,  a  plastic  explosive used  In
Vietnam,  containing 91%  RDX,  either  by  conscious  or  accidental Ingestlon.
Signs  of  the  Intoxication  Included multiple  generalized  seizures,  followed
by  lethargy,  severe  nausea and  vomiting,  muscle  twitching and  loss  of
memory.   The   seizures  usually  occurred  without  previous  Indication  of
sickness.   At  least  3/8  patients  had  consumed  alcohol  In the form of beer or

5940H                                -43-                             07/28/89

-------
vodka with  or before  Ingesting C-4.   Actual amounts  of C-4  consumed  were
only reported  for  three  patients,  and were 25 g,  25 g and 180  g;  the other
exposures could  not be  quantified.   There were  no fatalities  reported  and
all  patients  recovered   within  several   days  except  the  case  of  180  g
Ingestlon  who  had  anemia   and loss  of  recent   memory  after  30  days  of
hosp1ta!1zat1on {Stone et al., 1969).
    von  Oettlngen  et al.  (1949)  reported that no signs  of  Irritation  were
seen when  a 1 cm2 patch of  wet  gauze Covered with  RDX  was taped  onto  the
forearm of a volunteer for 48 hours.
6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY
6.2.1.    Inhalation.   Pertinent   data  regarding  the   carclnogenlclty   of
Inhalation  exposure  to  RDX  were   not  located In the  literature   cited  In
Appendix A.
6.2.2.    Oral.   In  the  2-year study  using  mice   reported  by  Llsh  et  al.
(1984)   (see Section  6.1.2.2.),  oral  administration  fed  In  the diet of  0,
1.5, 7.0,   35  and  175  mg/kg/day  resulted  In a   statistically  significant
Increase  In the number  of  hepatocellular carcinomas combined  with  adenomas
In  the  females at  doses >7.0  mg/kg/day  when compared with  controls  (Table
6-1).   The  Investigators  observed  that  the  Incidence of  hepatocellular
adenomas/carcinomas  1n  the  female  control  mice  was unusually  low;  however,
the  Incidence  of   these liver  tumors  was   statistically  significant  when
compared with  historical control Incidence of  7.954 from the NTP (n.d.).   The
Incidence of  combined alveolar-bronchial  carcinoma/adenoma  1n male mice  at
the highest dose level was  Increased compared with controls but the Increase
was not statistically significant.
    Levlne  et  al.  (1984)  (see Section  6.1.2.2.) observed  no evidence for the
carclnogenlclty  of  RDX  In  F344  rats  under  the   conditions  of the study.
                                                                              *

5940H                                -44-                             10/03/89

-------
                                  TABLE 6-1

             Incidence of Liver  Adenoma/Carcinoma  In  B6C3F1  Nice
                         Fed Cyclonlte for  105  Weeks3
Sex/
Number b
F/65
F/62
F/64
F/64
F/31
M/63
M/60
M/62
M/59
M/37
Dose
(mg/kg/day)
0
1.5
7.0
35.0
175/100d
0
1.5
7.0
35.0
175/1 00d
QUALITY OF EVIDENCE
Tumor Incidence
(%)
1 (1-5)
5 (8.1)
9 (14.1)c
12 (18.8)c
6 (19.4)c
21 (33.3)
26 (43.3)
17 (27.4)
25 (42.4)
18 (48.6)
Strengths of Study: The compound was administered to both sexes at more  than
                    two dose levels.  Adequate  number  of  animals/group;  nat-
                    ural route  of exposure;  adequate  duration of  exposure;
                    compound 89-98% pure;  MTD achieved.
Weakness of Study:  Highest  dose  altered  after  10  weeks   due   to  excess
                    mortality In males and females.
Overall Adequacy:   Adequate


aSource: Llsh et al.. 1984

bNumber of animals surviving >12 months

Clnc1dence significantly different from that of  control group (p<0.05)

dBecause  of  toxldty.  Initial  dose of  175 was  reduced  to  100  after  10
 weeks.


6200H                                -45-                            07/28/89

-------
Groups of 75  rats/sex/group  received diets that provided  dosages  of 0, 0.3,
1.5, 8  or  40  mg/kg/day  for  <24  months.   Increased mortality  and decreased
rate of body  weight  gain were observed at doses of  40 mg/kg/day,  suggesting
that the MTD had been reached.
6.2.3.   Other  Relevant  Information.  Other  relevant  Information  regarding
the  carclnogenldty  of  RDX  were  not located  In  the available  literature
cited 1n Appendix A.
6.3.   MUTAGENICITY
    ROX at concentrations <2.5 mg/plate was negative  In the  reverse mutation
assay  In  Salmonella  typhlmurlum  strains  TA98,  TA100,  TA1535,  TA1537  and
TA1538 with  rat liver S-9 metabolic  activation;   1t was  also  not mugatenlc
when tested  In the Salmonella  spot test at spot concentrations of 0.625  and
1.25  mg with   the  same  strains   (Whong  et  al.,  1980).   It  was  also  not
mutagenlc to any of  the  five bacterial strains  of  S^ typhlmurlum  when tested
with  and without  rat   liver  activation  at  concentrations  <.012  mg/plate
(Simmon et al., 1977).
    In  a  separate  study,  Cholakls et al. (1980)  reported that RDX  was  not
mutagenlc to  any of  the five Salmonella tester strains at concentrations <1
mg/plate  with  and   without  metabolic   activation   (Arochlor-lnduced  rat
liver).  RDX  was  not mutagenlc  In the rat dominant lethal mutation  test at
doses <50 mg/kg/day.
    Dllley et  al.  (1979)  assayed  the  effect of  various concentrations of  ROX
In  an  unscheduled  DNA  synthesis  assay.   The  ability of  RDX dissolved  1n
dlmethylsulfoxlde  to  stimulate  DNA  synthesis   In  cultured WI-38   cells with
and without metabolic  activation  (mouse  liver)  was determined  to  be zero at
concentrations <4 mg/mB..
5940H                                -46-                             10/03/89

-------
6.4.   TERATOGENICITY
    A study  of the  teratologlcal  effects of  RDX In Charles  River  Sprague-
Dawley rats  was done  by  Angerhofer et  al.  (1986).  In  a pilot  study,  RDX
(90% pure) dosages  of  10,  20, 40,  80 and  120  mg/kg/day were  administered by
gavage to  pregnant rats,  six/dose  group, on  days 6-15 of gestastlon.   The
test  compound  was  suspended  In 10X  gum acacia In concentrations  of  3%.
Total volume of the administered  doses was not given.   Only six control  rats
received  the  vehicle,  4  mi/kg/day,  on- the  same  schedule.   Test  animals
were observed  dally for changes  In  appearance  and behavior;  all animals  that
died before  the end of the  study were  necropsled.  On day 20 of  gestation,
surviving  animals  were  sacrificed  and  examined  for  gross  pathological
changes;  the  uterus and  ovaries were  exposed and  examined   for  number  and
location   of   viable   fetuses,   nonvlable    fetuses,   resorptlons,   total
Implantations  and  corporea lutea.  Each  fetus was weighed,  measured,  sexed
and examined  for  external  malformations  and  visceral anomalies.   All  of  the
rats  that  received  >40  g/kg/day  died   before   the   end  of  their  dosing
periods.   These animals experienced  convulsions  before  death and  necropsy
findings  Included  bloody  discharge  around   their mouths  and noses.   Dams
treated with  20 mg/kg/day had  urogenltal  discharge and red  nasal discharge
throughout  the dosing  time.   Those administered 10 mg/kg/day displayed no
effects from  treatment.   Pups born  to treated  dams  from all  test  groups  had
body weights that were significantly lower than those born  to control dams.
    In  the definitive  study,  groups  of  at  least  25 mated rats  were  given
dosages of 0,  2,  6 or 20 mg/kg/day on days  6-15  of gestation (Angerhofer et
al.,  1986).   Necropsies were  performed  on  all  animals that  died or  became
moribund before the end of  the study.  All  surviving animals  were sacrificed
5940H                                -47-                             07/28/89

-------
on day 20 of gestation; uteri were  exposed  and scored for number of fetuses,
Implantation sites, resorptlons, and corpora  lutea.   Each uterus was excised
and  weighed and  this  value subtracted  from  the  terminal  body weight  to
determine  the  absolute  body weight  change  during  gestation.   The  fetuses
were  removed,  weighed,  measured,  sexed   and  scored   for  abnormalities;
one-half were  then  prepared for soft  tissue examination and  the others  for
skeletal observation.
    Of  the  dams  receiving  20  mg/kg/day-,  16  of  51   (31%)  did  not  survive.
These   animals   experienced  urogenltal  discharge,   red   nasal   and   oral
discharge,  convulsions and  prostration  before death;  necropsies  of  these
animals did not establish a  specific cause  of death.   Some surviving dams at
this dose level exhibited nasal, oral  and urogenltal  discharge, convulsions,
hyperactlvlty  and  alopecia.   These  animals  had  body  weights  that  were
significantly  lower  than controls  on  days  10, 13 and  16 of  gestation  but
which were more comparable with those  of  controls  by  day 20.   The high-dose
group had  a fertility Index of  74% compared with 64% In  the  controls  and a
gestation Index of 94% compared with 100% 1n all other groups.
    One  dam from each of  the  other  treatment  groups   (2  mg/kg/day  and  6
mg/kg/day)  did  not  survive  the  study.   No  overt signs were  noted for  these
deaths.
    The  fertility Indexes  for  controls and  the 2 mg/kg/day  dose group were
64% while that  for  the 6 mg/kg/day  group  was 74%.  The gestation  Indexes for
both of these groups was 100%.
    Studies  of  fetal  parameters   showed   no   statistically  significant
differences In  Implantations  per dam or  fetuses per  dam In treatment groups
compared with controls.  All  treatment  groups had slightly higher Incidences
of  resorptlon   (6%)  than the  controls  (5%), but  the differences  were  not

5940H                                -48-                             07/28/89

-------
statistically  significant.   The  weights   and   lengths  of  fetuses  In  all
treated groups were significantly  less  than  those  of  controls  (p<0.05).  The
differences, however, were slight  and did  not appear  to  be dose-related at 2
or  6  mg/kg/day.   When  the   data  were  statistically reanalyzed  using  the
litter as the basis of  comparison,  reduced fetal  length  and body weight were
significant only at  20  mg/kg/day (U.S.  EPA, 1988a).   One  of the conclusions
drawn  by  the  authors  of this study was 4hat oral dosages  of RDX as  low as 2
mg/kg/day can  cause reduced  fetal  size In  rat  pups  receiving  the  chemical
during  the  major   period  of  organogenesls.   U.S.   EPA  (1988a),  however,
considered 20 mg/kg/day a  LOAEL  and  6 mg/kg/day  a  NOAEL  for fetal  effects In
this study.
    Cholakls et al.  (1980} studied the developmental  effects of RDX on F344
rats and  New Zealand rabbits.   Treatment  groups of  24  pregnant  rats  or  10
pregnant  rabbits received  doses  of 0,  0.2,  2.0 or  20 mg/kg/day  by gavage on
days 6-19 (rats) or 7-29  (rabbits)  of  gestation.   The vehicle  was  aqueous 1%
methylcellulose  and 1% polysorbate 80.    Positive  controls  were  given  by
gavage  350  mg/kg  hydroxyurea (rats) or  3 mg/kg/day  of  6-am1nonlcot1nam1de
(rabbits).  Animals were  observed  dally for signs of  toxldty;  body weights
and  feed  consumption   were   monitored  frequently.    Dams   were  weighed  and
sacrificed  on  day  20 (rats)  or day 30  (rabbits)  of  gestation.   Uteri  were
exposed and examined.   The number  and  position of  resorptlons,  live fetuses
and  corpora  lutea   were scored.   Fetuses  were  counted,  weighed,  sexed  and
examined  for  abnormalities.   Selected  fetuses were cleared and stained  for
soft tissue and skeletal examination.
    Rats  that received  20  mg/kg/day  had 24% mortality (6  of 25), lower  whole
body weights  and  liver weights  compared   with controls  and signs of  neuro-
toxlclty.   There  were  fewer  viable fetuses  (81.4%)   compared with  controls
5940H                                -49-                              07/28/89

-------
(93.2%) and more early  resorptlons  (15.3%) than controls  (6.0%).   There was
no evidence for  teratogenlc  effects  and no adverse  effects  were reported at
0.2  or  2.0 mg/kg/day.   The only  effect  seen  In the  rabbits  was a  slight
reduction  1n  maternal  weight  gain  at the highest RDX  dose.  There were no
effects on  the  number  of  fetuses/dam,  Implants/dam, fetal weights or  fetal
abnormalities and there appeared to be no specific teratologlc effects.
6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
    A 2-generat1on reproduction study of RDX  using F344  rats  was reported by
Cholakls  et  al. (1980).   The  FQ  generation  consisted  of 22  males  and  22
females/treatment group  that  were  fed diets  adjusted  to provide  dosages  of
0, 5,  16  or  50  mg/kg/day for  13 weeks  and then mated.   The  F,  animals  were
maintained on  the test  diets  for  13 weeks  after   weaning  and then  mated.
F_   pups   were   sacrificed   after   weaning    and   selected  animals   were
necropsled;  some tissues  were  prepared  for   hlstopathologlcal  evaluation.
Mortality  In  the  high-dose  group was  18%  1n the FQ  generation  compared
with 0%  1n controls  (statistically significant,  p  value not given) and the
number  of stillbirths  In F,  and  F_ generations was   significantly  higher
than those  of  controls  1n this  dose  group (p  value not given).   The  number
of  Hveblrths   was  also  decreased  In  the   high-dose   rats,  compared  with
controls.  Rats  from the  high-dose  group showed a  consistent  reduction  In
body  weight  and food  consumption  In   the  F_  and  F,  generations.   There
appeared  to  be  no differences In  gross necropsy observa- tlons  of F™  pups
compared  with  controls.   Reduced  pup body  weights  at  25 days after  birth
were reported  at 16 and  50 mg/kg/day  In  offspring of  the  first  FQ  mating
but  not   In  the   second  FQ  mating   or  1n   subsequent  generations.   A
statistically significant Increase In the  number  of  renal  cortical cysts was
reported   at   16  mg/kg/day   In   F?  offspring  of  either   sex  examined

5940H                                -50-                             07/28/89

-------
hlstopathologlcally.  Although   the  authors  concluded   that   reproductive
performance of  rats  1n  the  low-  and middle-dose groups was  not  affected by
treatment, the  observation  of lower  body  weights  In the  first  FQ offspring
at  weaning suggests  Impaired  lactation  ability  1n the  dams,  which  Is  a
slight, but adverse, reproductive effect.
6.6.   SUMMARY
    In  the only report of  Inhalation exposure  to'  RDX,  69 humans  showed no
adverse  effects  after exposure  to  atmospheric  concentrations  ranging  from
          3
0-1.5 mg/m  In an ammunition plant (Hathaway and Buck, 1977).
    Subchronlc exposures  of rats to  RDX  In the diet produced  several  dose-
related  effects.   Levlne et  al.  (1981)  noted  that  mean  survival  times of
F344  rats was  Inversely  related  to concentrations  of  RDX   In their  diets.
Other  dose-related  effects  seen  were a reduction  In mean body  weights  and
reduced  serum  trlglycerlde  levels.   Doses  ranged  from 10-600  mg/kg/day  for
90  days.   At  10 mg/kg/day, male  body weights were reduced 6%  compared  with
controls.   Cholakls  et  al.  (1980)  reported  that  administration  of   28
mg/kg/day  for 90  days  In  the diets  of  F344  rats produced  no  adverse effects
but  saw a dose related decrease  In mean  body weights at  40  mg/kg/day.   von
Oettlngen  et  al.  (1949)  reported no  adverse effects  1n rats fed  RDX  1n  the
diets  at  a  dosage  of  15  mg/kg/day  for  10  weeks  and  for  12  weeks,  but
Increased  mortality  and  decreased weight  gain  at  dosages  of 25,  50  and  100
mg/kg/day.
    In  a  subchronic  study  with B6C3F1 mice, Cholakls et al.  (1980) reported
a  dose-related  Increase In  mean liver weights  that  was  significant at  the
highest  dose  when the animals were  exposed  to 0,  80, 145 and  277 mg/kg/day
(TWA  doses)  for  90 days.   The  authors noted no significant  effects  In  mice
receiving  145 mg/kg/day.
5940H                                 -51-                             07/28/89

-------
    Subchronlc  studies  with  other  species  have  been  done.   In dogs,  von
Oettlngen et  al.  (1949)  saw a  20%  weight loss  compared with  controls  and
convulsions and  behavior  changes  In  dogs given  42.9  mg/kg/day  for  42  days
(expanded dose).   Hart  (1974) observed  no  adverse effects when  beagle  dogs
were given  <10  mg/kg/day  for 90 days.   Cynomulgus monkeys  administered  RDX
by  gavage  for  90  days  experienced  no adverse  effects  at  a  dosage of  1
mg/kg/day but had  disturbances of  the central  nervous  system at 10 mg/kg/day
(Martin and Hart, 1974).
    Three 2-year dietary studies are  reported,  one with  B6C3F1  mice (Llsh et
al.,  1984),  one  with  F344  rats  (Levlne  et  al.,   1984)  and  one  with
Sprague-Dawley rats  (Hart,  1976).   In mice, dosages of  1.5  mg/kg/day caused
no  adverse  effects,  while  dosages  of 7.0  mg/kg/day  caused  biochemical
changes.  Doses  of 35 mg/kg/day  resulted  In  testlcular  degeneration  In  the
males  and  higher   renal  weights,  and  107  (TWA  dose)  mg/kg/day  produced
decreased body weights and  Increased  kidney and  heart weights  compared  with
controls.   Results  with  the rats  Indicated  that there were  no  adverse
effects  at  a dosage of  0.3 mg/kg/day  while  doses >1.5  mg/kg/day  produced
prostate  Inflammation and  hemoslderosls In  the  males.   Lower  body  weights
compared  with controls were seen  In  rats given a dosage  of  8 mg/kg/day.
Effects  seen  at  40 mg/kg/day  Included  Increased mortality and  reduced  body
weights  compared  with controls.   No  adverse  effects  at  doses  <10  mg/kg/day
were noted  1n a study with Sprague Dawley rats (Hart,  1976).
    Acute exposures  of  rats  by  gavage  resulted  In L05Q  values  ranging  from
71-200  mg/kg  (von  Oettlngen  et  al.,  1949;  Dllley et al., 1979;  Cholakls et
al., 1980);  reported LDrn values  1n  mice administered  by gavage range  from
58-97  mg/kg (Dllley  et al., 1979; Cholakls  et  al.,  1980) with  one  outlier
value of 500 mg/kg reported by Spector (1956).
5940H                                -52-                             07/28/89

-------
    Oral human exposures  resulted 1n convulsions,  seizures  and  unconscious-
ness  several  hours  or  days  after  exposure  but  no  fatalities  have  been
reported.
    The  only  carcinogenic effect  reported was  seen  1n  female  B6C3F1  mice
administered ROX at  0,  1.5,  7, 35 and 175/100 mg/kg/day  for  105 weeks  (Llsh
et al.,  1984).  The  animals  receiving dosages >7  mg/kg/day  had statistically
significant Increased Incidences  of  liver  adenomas'  and carcinomas  (combined)
compared with  controls.  This  effect was  not  seen  In  the  male  mice.   No
carcinogenic effects were seen in F344 rats at doses <40 mg/kg/day.
    RDX  was  not  mutagenlc  In  the Ames  assay at concentrations <1  mg/plate
with  metabolic  activation  and <2.5  mg/plate without  activation  (Whong  et
al., 1980;  Cholakls et al.,  1980).
    In  reproductive/teratology studies using  Sprague-Dawley  rats,  RDX caused
reduction  In  fetal  size and maternal  mortality  at  concentrations  of  20
mg/kg/day when given by gavage on days  6-15  of  gestation (Angerhofer et al.
1986).   In F344 rats, at  concentrations  of 20 mg/kg/day when given by gavage
on  days 6-19 of  gestation,  RDX  produced  both  embryotoxlclty  and  maternal
toxlcity  (Cholakls   et  al.,   1980).   F344  rats  exposed  to  a  dosage of  16
mg/kg/day  1n  a  2-generat1on  reproduction study   showed  signs  of  Impaired
lactation ability but no embryo or maternal toxlcity.
5940H                                -53-                             07/28/89

-------
                    7.   EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
7.1.   HUMAN
    A verified RfD  for  chronic oral  exposure is  0.003 mg/kg/day  (U.S.  EPA,
1988b).  The duration of this RfD presented In Section 8.2.2.2.
    ACGIH  (1988)  recommended  a  TWA-TLV  of  1.5  mg/m3  for  occupational
exposure based  on  analogy  to TNT (ACGIH, 1986).  This value  Is accompanied
by  a  "skin"  notation,  Indicating  that  dermal  exposure  Is  potentially
                                              •
hazardous.    A  STEL of  3  mg/m3 Is 1 fated, but ACGIH  (1986,  1988) recommends
that  this   value  dropped  because  data  are   Insufficient.    OSHA  (1989)
established  a  PEL  for  an  8-hour  workday  of  1.5  mg/m3   with  a  "skin"
notation, primarily to provide protection against neuropathic effects.
7.2.   AQUATIC
    Guidelines  and  standards  for  the  protection  of  aquatic  life  from
exposure  to  RDX  were  not   located  In  the  available  literature  cited  'In
Appendix A.
5940H
-54-
06/26/89

-------
                              8.   RISK  ASSESSMENT
8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY
8.1.1.   Inhalation.    Pertinent  data  regarding  the  carclnogenlclty   of
Inhalation  exposure to  RDX  were  not   located  In  the available  literature
cited In Appendix A.
8.1.2.   Oral.  RDX has been  shown  to  be  carglnogenlc  to female B6C3F1 mice
when  administered  at  dietary  concentrations  adjusted  to provide  dosages  of
0,  1.5,  7,  35 and  175/100  mg/kg/day  for 105  weeks  (Llsh  et a!.,  1984).
Females  at   dosage  levels  >7  mg/kg/day   had   statistically  significant
Increased  Incidences  of  liver  adenomas and  carcinomas  (combined)  compared
with  controls.   This  effect  was  not  seen 1n male  mice.   This study  was  an
adequate carcinogenic study  because the compound was given to  both  sexes  at
more  than  two  dose levels,  there were an  adequate  number of  animals  In each
dose  group  (85  at  start), the route was natural  and length of  exposure time
was adequate.  The compound was  89-98%  pure.  The main weakness of the study
was that the highest dose had to be decreased after 10 weeks  because of high
mortality  In  this  dose  group.  Thus,   the number  of  mice  In  this  exposure
group was reduced before the conclusion of the study.
8.1.3.   Other Routes.  Pertinent data  regarding the  carclnogenlclty  of RDX
by  other  routes  of exposure  or  other  data regarding  the carclnogenlclty  of
RDX were not located In the available literature cited  In Appendix  A.
8.1.4.   Weight  of   Evidence.   Data   were  not   located   regarding   the
carclnogenlclty  of RDX   to   humans.   Oral  administration  of  cyclonlte  to
female  B6C3F1  mice  (Llsh   et   al.,   1984)  resulted   In  a  statistically
significant   Increased   Incidence   of    liver   adenomas   and   carcinomas
(combined).  According to EPA guidelines  (U.S.  EPA, 1986c),  the L1sh  et al.
(1984) study  constitutes  limited evidence for carclnogenlclty  In  laboratory
5940H
-55-
07/28/89

-------
animals.   Applying  U.S.  EPA  classification • scheme for  carcinogenic  risk
assessment adopted  by the  U.S.  EPA  (1986b), RDX  Is assigned  to U.S.  EPA
Group C, possible human carcinogen.
8.1.5.   Quantitative Risk Assessment.
    8.1.5.1.    INHALATION   —    Data   were   not   located   regarding   the
cardnogenlclty  of   Inhalation  exposure  to  RDX.  The  development of  liver
tumors  In female  mice  In   the  2-year  dietary   study  (L1sh  et  al.,  1984)
suggests  that  RDX may  be  carcinogenic-by any  route of  exposure,  provided
absorption and  distribution  to the  liver  occurred.  Pharmacoklnetlc  data
(see  Section  5.1)  suggest   that  absorption  from the lung  occurs.    In  the
absence of adequate  Inhalation data,  It  Is  appropriate to adopt  the  q  * of
5.4  x 10"2  (mg/kg/dayr1  derived   for  oral   exposure (see Section  8.1.5.2)
as the slope  factor for Inhalation  exposure as well.
    In  estimating  the concentration of RDX  In air associated with  specific
levels  of  Increased  risk  of cancer, H Is necessary  to adjust for  the ratio
of  the  extent  of  absorption  from the respiratory  tract to  that from  the
gastrointestinal   tract.     Pharmacoklnetlc   data   were   Insufficient   for
estimation of  the  extent of absorption  of Inhaled RDX from  the  respiratory
tract.  A default  value of  50%  Is assumed.   The  rat study by Schneider  et
al.  (1977)   Indicated  that  absorption  from  the  gastrointestinal  tract  was
nearly  complete.   A  resp1ratory:gastro1ntest1nal absorption ratio of  0.5 Is
estimated.   By  applying  the adjustment  factor of 0.5 discussed above  and by
assuming  humans  weigh 70 kg and  Inhale  20 mVday,  It  Is estimated that  an
air  concentration  of  RDX  of  1.3xlO~3  mg/m3 would  be  associated  with  an
Increased  cancer risk  of  lxlO~s.   Concentrations  In  air of  1.3xlO~4  and
1.3xlO"s  mg/m3  are  associated   with   Increased cancer   risks   of   lx!0~6
and lxlO~7,  respectively.
5940H
-56-
07/28/89

-------
    8.1.5.2.   ORAL   —   A   statistically  significant   and   dose-related
Increased  Incidence  of  combined  adenomas and  carcinomas  was  reported  In
female  B6C3F1  mice fed  diets  containing RDX  for  2  years  (L1sh et  al.f
1984).  There was  no  evidence of a carcinogenic effect  In  male  mice In this
study nor evidence  of cardnogenldty  In  F344  rats  1n a 2-year dietary study
(Levlne et al., 1984).  RDX was  assigned  to  U.S.  EPA Group C, possible human
carcinogen, because of the positive results In the female mice.
    The decision whether  to  estimate  slope factors  for  Group C  chemicals  1s
made on a  chemical-by-chemical  basis.   In the case   of  RDX,  the response  In
the  female  mice was  not only  statistically significant  but occurred  In  a
dose-related   fashion,   strengthening   the   position   that  the   observed
carcinogenic  response  was   due   to   exposure  to   RDX;   therefore.  It  1s
appropriate  to  estimate  a slope factor  for  oral  exposure to RDX  using the
data  From  female  mice.   The  data  and calculations  for  the  derivation are
presented  In  Appendix  B.    A  q * of 5.4xlO~2  (mg/kg/day)'1  was  derived
for oral exposure of humans  to RDX.
    From  the  q^  of  5.4xlO~2   (mg/kg/day)'1,  H   Is   estimated  that   a
concentration  of   6.5xlO~3   mg/8.   In  drinking  water   1s   associated  with
Increased cancer  risk to humans of lx!0~s.   This  estimate  Is  based  on the
assumption  that  humans  weigh  70 kg and  drink  2 I  of water/day  (U.S.  EPA,
1980).   Drinking   water   concentrations   of  6.5xlO~4  mg/l and   6.5xlQ~5
mg/8,  are  associated  with  Increased  cancer  risks  of  IxlQT6  and  lxl(T7,
respectively.
5940H
-57-
10/02/89

-------
8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
8.2.1.  Inhalation Exposure.
    8.2.1.1.   LESS  THAN LIFETIME  EXPOSURES  (SUBCHRONIC)   —  Hathaway  and
Buck  (1977)  did  not  see  any  adverse effects  on  69 workers  exposed  to
workroom atmospheric concentrations of  RDX  ranging  from undetectable to 1.57
mg/ma  with an  average  value  of  0.28  mg/m3.    This  study  cannot  be  used
for risk assessment  because  exposures were  not  sufficiently quantified, only
69  persons were  evaluated,  the  study-was  narrowly  focused and  did  not
evaluate a sufficiently  broad  spectrum of  potential  toxlcologlcal  effects
and no effects were seen.
    8.2.1.2.   CHRONIC EXPOSURES -- Pertinent data  regarding  the  toxlclty of
Inhalation  exposure to  RDX  were not  located  In  the  literature  cited  In
Appendix A; data are Insufficient for derivation of an RfD.
8.2.2.  Oral Exposure.
    8.2.2.1.   LESS  THAN  LIFETIME   EXPOSURES   (SUBCHRONIC)  -   Of   the
subchronlc  studies  of  RDX that are reported, several  cannot  be used for RfD
derivation.   Schneider  et al.  (1978)  (rec  #16)  saw no  adverse effects when
RDX-saturated  drinking  water   at  dally  doses  of  5-8  mg/kg  was   given  to
Sprague-Dawley  rats  for 90  days.   MacPhall et al.  (1985)  (rec #15)  saw no
changes In  behavior  or motor  activity  In  Sprague-Dawley rats that were given
<10  mg/kg/day  for   30  days.   Hart   (1974)  (rec  #20)  observed  no  adverse
effects after administration of 0.1,  1  or  10 mg/kg/day to  beagle  dogs for 90
days,   A  10-week  study  with  rats   (von   Oettlngen  et  al.,  1949) had  no
controls.
    Other   subchronlc  studies  In  which  adverse  effects   were   noted  are
appropriate for  RfD consideration,   von  Oettlngen et  al.  (1949)  (rec #18)
observed 40% mortality and  abnormal  behavior  In  a group of  20 rats that were

5940H                                -58-                             07/28/89

-------
given 25  mg/kg/day  but saw  no  adverse effects  1n  rats  treated at  the next
lowest  dosage,   15  mg/kg/day  (rec  #17).   Levlne  et  al.   (1981)   (rec  #8)
reported  that F344  rats administered  10  mg/kg/day  (the lowest  dose used In
the  study)  for  90 days, had  reduced serum trlglycerlde levels;  females  had
leukocytosls  and  males had reduced   body  weight  gain.   No  animals  had
hlstopathologlcal  lesions.   Cholakls  et  al.   (1980)  (rec  #11} observed  a
dose-related  decrease  In mean  body weights  1n F344  rats  that received 40
mg/kg/day for 90  days  but  reported no  adverse  effects  1n  rats  that received
28 mg/kg/day (rec #10).
    RDX administered In the  diets  of B6C3F1 mice produced  no adverse effects
at  dosages  of 145 mg/kg/day for  91 days  but  at  dosages  of  277  mg/kg/day,
caused greater mortality  than controls and hyperactlvlty and  nervousness In
males (Cholakls et al., 1980) (rec #13, 14).
    von  Oettlngen et  al.  (1949)  (rec #19)  observed  a   20%  weight  loss,
hyperactlvlty,  and  convulsions  In  seven  female  dogs  that were   given  50
mg/kg/day, 6  days a  week  for 6 weeks.   Cynomulgus  monkeys  were administered
RDX  by gavage for  90 days  and showed  no adverse effects at  doses  of 0.1  and
1 mg/kg/day but  five/six animals had disturbances of  the CNS at 10 mg/kg/day
((Martin  and  Hart, 1974)  (rec #21, 22).   The weakness of  this  study Is that
only a  small  number  of animals  were exposed and hlstopathologlcal  examina-
tion was  not performed.
    The monkey  appears to  be the  species  most sensitive to  the CNS effects
of  ROX according  to  the subchronlc studies.  None  of  the  subchronlc studies
reported  adverse  effects  1n  rats,  dogs  or  mice  at doses  <10 mg/kg/ day,
which Is  the  lowest  adverse effect  dose In  the Martin and  Hart (1974) (rec
#22) monkey  study;   the  no  effect  dose  In  the study  Is  1 mg/kg/day (rec
#21).  U.S. EPA  (1988a,b), however,  concluded  that  monkeys  and  dogs appeared
5940H                                -59-                             07/28/89

-------
to  be  no more  sensitive than  rats.   Because  this  study Included  only  six
monkeys/group  and  hlstopathologlcal  examination was  not performed,  confi-
dence  In  the 1 mg/kg/day as a  NOEL Is low; therefore,  the  verified RfO  for
chronic   exposure,   0.003  mg/kg/day  (U.S.  EPA,   1988b),   1s   adopted   as
sufficiently  protective  for  subchronlc  exposure.   Confidence  In  the  key
study, the data base and the RfD Is high (U.S.  EPA, 1988b).
    8.2.2.2.   CHRONIC EXPOSURES   - Three chronic  studies  and three  develop-
mental/reproduction  studies are  considered In  th'e  determination of  an  RfO
for  chronic  oral   exposure.    Levlne  et   al.   (1984)   reported  suppuratlve
Inflammation  of  the prostate and hemoslderosls  In  the spleen  In male F344
rats  that were given  1.5 mg/kg/day  for  105 weeks  but did  not  see adverse
effects In rats treated  with 0.3 mg/kg/day  (rec #1  and 2).  Hart (1976) (rec
#7) reported  no  adverse effects In Sprague-Oawley rats  at 10 mg/kg/day,  the
highest dose  used.   Developmental  studies with  RDX  In F344 rats (Cholakls et
al., 1980) showed  that  embryotoxlclty and maternal  toxldty  occurred at dose
levels of 20 mg/kg/day when the compound was administered by gavage on days
6-19 of  gestation  (rec  #26).   A reproduction  study  (Cholakls  et  al., 1980)
showed  that   lactation  was  Impaired   In  dams  administered  16 mg/kg/day  J_n
utero.  through growth   period,  pregnancy  and   pup  weaning  (rec  #28).   No
adverse effects  on  fetal  or  maternal parameters  In F344 rats were seen at
dosages  of  0.2 and  2.0  mg/kg/day (rec #25).   In  a  developmental  toxldty
study  with  Sprague-Oawley  rats.  Angerhofer et  al.   (1986)  reported reduced
fetal  body  weight  and   length  without maternal  toxldty  at exposures of  2
mg/kg/day,  the lowest  dose used,  on  days 6-15  of  gestation.   Subsequent
evaluation of the data  by U.S.  EPA   (1988a),  however,  Indicated  that fetal
effects were  significant at 20 mg/kg/day, but not at 2 or 6 mg/kg/day.
5940H                                -60-                             07/28/89

-------
    When New  Zealand  rabbHs  were treated  by  gavage on days 7-29  of  gesta-
tion, dose  levels of  20 mg/kg/day  caused decreased  maternal  weight  gain;
yet, 2  mg/kg/day had no  adverse  effects  (Cholakls  et  al.,  1980)  (rec  #29,
30).
    Administration of RDX  In  the diets  of female B6C3F1 mice for  105  weeks
resulted 1n hypocholesterolemla at doses of 7  mg/kg/day and hepatomegaly  at
35 mg/kg/day.   Hales that received 35 mg/kg/day had  higher renal  weights and
an  Increased  Incidence  of testlcular degeneration  (Llsh et  al., 1984)  (rec
#5, 6).
    The  chronic  data  Indicate  that  rats are  more sensitive  than mice  or
rabbits   to  the  effects  of oral  RDX  because they exhibit adverse effects  at
lower dose  levels.   The lowest dosage  at which an adverse effect  was  noted
was  1.5  mg/kg/day  In  male F344  rats  (Levlne  et al.,  1984)  (rec  #2).  The
highest  dosage  lower than  1.5  mg/kg/day  at  which  no  adverse effects  were
seen Is  0.3 mg/kg/day  (Levlne et al.,  1984) (rec #1).   Thus, 0.3 mg/kg/ day
Is  selected as  the  basis  for an  RfD   for  chronic  exposure  to RDX.   Appli-
cation  of  an  uncertainty factor  of 100  (10   to extrapolate  from rats  to
humans  and 10   for  Intraspedes  variation)   results   In  an  RfD  of   0.003
mg/kg/day.  This  Is  the value reported   In IRIS (U.S.  EPA, 1988b).  U.S. EPA
(1988b)   considers confidence  In  the  key study, the data base and the  RfD  to
be high.
5940H                                -61-                             07/28/89

-------
                           9.   REPORTABIE  QUANTITIES
9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
    The systemic toxIcUy  of RDX was  discussed  In  Chapter  6.   For each study
considered  for  computation of  candidate  CSs,  the lowest  dosages associated
with  the  effects  reported are  summarized  In Table  9-1.   Effects  noted  In
chronic exposure studies  In  mice Included hypercholesterolemla,  hepatomegaly
and  testlcular  degeneration  (Llsh  et al., 1984}.'  Effects  seen  In  chronic
rat   studies    Included   suppuratlve    Inflammation    of   the   prostate,
hemoslderosls,  hepatomegaly,  decreased  serum protein  levels and  Increased
mortality  (Levlne  et  al., 1984).   Developmental  effects  observed  In  rats
were  reduced  fetal   body weight   and   length  and  fetal  lethality  at  20
mg/kg/day,  but   the  fetal effects  were  accompanied  by maternal  lethality
(Angerhofer  et  al.,   1986;  Cholakls  et  al.,  1980)  and are  not  scored  for
derivation  of  candidate  CSs.    Impaired  lactation ability was   reported  In
rats  at  16  mg/kg/day   (Cholakls  et   al.,  1980).    Effects   reported  in
subchronlc  studies not  reported In  these species  In chronic  studies  Include
severe weight  loss In  dogs  at 42.9  mg/kg/day  (von  Oettlngen et  al.,  1949)
and convulsions  and CNS disturbances  In monkeys at 10  mg/kg/day (Martin and
Hart, 1974).
    Table 9-2 presents  candidate CSs  for  the  effects  presented  In Table 9-1.
CSs are calculated for the chronic and  reproductive  studies.  A  CS  Is  also
calculated  for  the subchronlc  study  with  monkeys (Martin and   Hart,  1974)
because  It   reported  the  lowest dose  level  at  which  disturbances  of  the
central nervous  system,  Including  convulsions,  were  seen.   A  CS  Is  also
calculated  for  body  weight  loss  In  dogs  In  the subchronlc  study by  von
Oettlngen et al. (1949)  because no  chronic data were  located  regarding  this
effect In this  species.   An  uncertainty factor  of 10 was  not applied In the

5940H                                -62-                             07/28/89

-------

Ot
e
at
01
<*»
at





at
v»
e
o
CL
v»
Of


•a ai _
a 0»>,
£ VI *S
e> o >*
«to O 0»
VI JC
C B "X
S1I
z
S -o §•—
. 1- O -O
0 OOX.
£ «- o>
V» ^ J*
** 5 2 'oi
an B *
s £
h- •-
£ C* M
|f IB <9
,2 35
e w

2 £|
O ,J




-»•* ,
••m «•%
s **
a.



4» flB

f *>-2
j> f  1) —

t_ l_
01 IQ
f*J
(/)



X
3



^^
VI
01 C
U <*

••X'*'*
V* VI
m
**

4*

v> do



01
*e»
.c
u
o
Q.
•£


E
O



a

***


"m"
IS
0$

r» tn
o
*"*




eo
en
i
eo



u.
—
at



to
o

o





CO








•X. i—
Sco
3 ^_?
O 10

—
•~

at

li
i

at
c
01
Ol

'

14
3
W
2
**


09
(M



O

in


~^~
01
oS

in in
en o
*"*




eg
en
'
eg



t.
—
^



CO
o

O




in
CO








X,—
VI CO
3 O
O >O
X oo
—
^

01

•- en






J

Ol

a.
£


§
CM



O

in


~"~
tti



CO 0
*~lr




CO
en
r
CO



?
*»
^



8
O

O




in
CO








X.—
Irt CO
3 O

xee
n

at
at
c
>s
oi en
it

+• Vf


•— VI
c v»
^- o
s-
** VI
vi O
o 6
t. at
CV£


IM
O



*«rt

^




«






jam*

CO J<
en at
1 Q>
CO
a

*^*
L.
—
—



in
r*-
eo

0




in










x, »

10 CO
ac u.
m

01
^
e
si
K4 VI
at •—
i- at
u >
•a i—


2*^1

q^ o
It
a 3

£ VI


^
^



O

CO




o

•eo




<•••
VI
CO J<
en «t
i at
CO
s

*-*
tW
**
^



s
CM

a




in










x. »

« CO
at u.
 en


JJ
a

K.
i

•o
01 •
VI
s
w
c
•^


GO
in





s






o




^^,
VI
CO .*
en 01

CO
s

""•
L.
2
—



2
r—

o




tn










^ ^
•*-* •»

ae "-
19
e en
— "~
01 •
o •—
§:
•o
I
f
S

VI
o
v»

c o
Dl t.
oi e
a o
u
So
CM <+*


cn
s



en

CM



0) VI
32
•x cu
O I/I Ji
in >»
•o
^ft O





K



i-
>>
Jf



u


CM














^
^
Ol
o


•t» *
m en
B

•^ -^
t* w


M

u

• VI
vi at
c w
0 C
-* ia
M A
^ ^
C M
O —
u 'O


•»
CO
CO





o


^ ^
in
»
> M
"X ^Z O
01 <-r-
?S-
^ )tl>
O>^ U



^o

CM

M
01
VI
x»
en


Lite
^C




x.
>t in
at a
.M VI
c: oi
O £
X <-
.M
01
VI CO
J< ^

£ i—
C^ Ifl

g
4rf


u


•a
fti >»
^ *>
 a. a
en «t *•
t ^ VI
tM
e e
coo
S"" "• "^
~.*J +i



^9
L.
*fl
«4
^
'


o
CNl

o




•0
CM



^H





X, «
•** ^
i« CO
CK Lk































•O
at
^^

g
^
W*J
•^
O
**
3,
^
«*
^
c

>^
^
a*
T3

»
O
^
4
"S
"O
§

"^
-o

Ji
o
^^
-
I

o
A
e
5
«i
u
g
o
01
^
X.
"5
Jtf
afc-
-C
Ol


*
•o
o
A


i

c
tv^
K

>*
^
•a
Vfc
^kft
^x.
I
at u
OI >O
 en
O i —
•a
So.
uj
c
10 
-------





























o
Of,
^
O


Irt
01
CM >-
1 O
01 w

Ul
_l Ol
3 -
1— M

1

rre
o






























Ol
u
c
Ol
01
Ol
at





Or
at





I/I


91

QC












w
01
**-
UJ




a
>
*


a
.,- 10
c c -o
a - E o>
-C 3 E

•— -a
•0 01 -V
S M 01

c a ^
< 01
E
^


i/i
o>

01
a.

*r ^ *
§1 § ""
^— ^ •
,
* • ,_
fO

Ol
41 oi ai
c
JE JC ••-
I/I I/I >
•F- -~ 41


e o o
0 0 O
o o o




CM ^ i—

vO CM CO


CM >O in



c
o
••- C
(0 "*•* O
.«. « —
E i- *•
» 11 L.
j= 44 a.


O r- ^

f*1 CM M



Ol vO CM

^h ^ CO
rn o^ ^
•~

o o vn
p^ in r—
ro







01 Ol
!£ 3 **
€ 2 c?































c
ai
Ol

a.

i^
O

I/I
VI
o

41
t/i
4*





























i
"~
•
.
fUrn-
ft}

0>
01
C

^
Ol


0
o
o




in

o


^













^
CTI
I
o
a.
Ol
JC


M
\o
CM



Ol
.
,•»
CO


O
co









^j
10
at

I
*~
•
,
^f
fH

Ol
Ol
c
.^
^
Ol


o
o
f—



in

vO


O







***
.•^
|W—
HI

w
i
•o
41
I/I
41
U
e



IS)
\o
^



vD

^^
^D
m


0









jj
T)
QC
;
"
Ol

C
Ol
Ol
c
'Z
'J
^J
Ol
C V



s
o
>a



*

*


^










I/I

o
^
J^
Ol
Ol
X
§
CM


a
o
pj





^
o
r**

Oi
CM









Ol
O
a
2
£ •
4J"
L.
'O
X

•a
c
c
• ^
A^
I.
4?


s
o
^



10

in


CO









in
z


I/I 41
O C
• <- 10
's 3
C I/I
0 —
u -a


m
CJl
,_



CO

ro
CO
CM


0







>l*
41
C
I
O
2
.
^B.
fQ

^j
0)
Ul
jie
*Q
^_
o
f 1


o
e
o
<— •



m

-


CO







lA
C
O
>(_
44
m

u
a

•Q
1>
!_
1



*
*~
CM



P.
•
CO

*~


vO









—
,
JQ
Ol
>T
~
i
_
i

01
ja
§
14.

«MH
^1

-------
derivation of  MED  values  for these  subchronlc  studies because there was  no
evidence that the Intensity of the effects  Increased with  Increased  duration
of exposure.   The  highest CS, 18.1,  was  calculated for prostatlc  Inflamma-
tion and  hemoslderosls of  the  spleen 1n rats  exposed to  1.5 mg/kg/day  for
105 weeks  (Levlne  et al., 1984).  The CS of  18.1  corresponding to an RQ  of
1000 Is  chosen to represent  the  chronic  (noncancer)   toxldty of RDX  (Table
9-3).
9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY
    Data were  not  located  regarding  the cardnogenlcHy  of  RDX  to  humans.
Data from  laboratory  animals  (see Section 6.2.2) consisted of well  designed
and well  conducted 2-year  studies  using mice  (Llsh et  al.,  1984) and  rats
(Levlne et al.,  1984).  There was no evidence  of cardnogenlcHy  In  rats  of
either  sex  or   In   the   male  mice;  however,  female   mice  developed   a
dose-related and statistically  significantly  Increased Incidence of  combined
liver adenomas and carcinomas.  The positive  response  In the  female  mice was
responsible  for assignment   of  RDX  to  U.S.  EPA  Group   C,  possible human
carcinogen.
    Using  the  data presented  In Table 9-4 and  Appendix B  and  the  multistage
model by  Howe  and Crump  (1982),  a  human F factor  of  0.2780798(mg/kg/day}~1
was estimated,  which corresponds to  a  Potency  Group  of 3.  Potency  Group  3
compounds  In U.S. EPA Group C  are  assigned  a  "low"  hazard ranking, which
corresponds  to an RQ of 100 for carclnogenlclty.
5940H
-65-
07/28/89

-------
                                 TABLE 9-3
                                    RDX
          Minimum Effective Dose  (MED) and Reportable Quantity (RQ)
Route:
Spedes/sex:
Dose8:
Duration:
Effect:
RVd:
RVe:
CS:
RQ:
Reference:
oral
rat/male
18.2 mg/day
105 weeks
prostatic inflammation and hemosiderosis of spleen
3.61
5
18.1
1000
Levine et al.,  1984
 'Equivalent Human Dose
6200H
                   -66-
06/26/89

-------
                                 TABLE 9-4
                  Derivation of Potency Factor  
-------
                                10.   REFERENCES
ACGIH  (American  Conference  of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1986.
Documentation  of   the   Threshold  Limit  Values  and   Biological   Exposure
Indices.  5th ed.  ACGIH, Cincinnati, OH.  p.  162.

ACGIH  (American  Conference  of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1988.
Threshold  Limit  Values  and  Biological  Exposure  Indices  for  1988-1989.
ACGIH. Cincinnati,  OH.  p. 17, 40.

Angerhofer,  R.A.,   B.   Davis  and  L.  Balezewskl.   1986.    Teratologlcal
assessment of trlnUro-RDX 1n rats.  NTIS AD-A166 249.   24  p.

Atkinson, R.   1985.   Kinetics and mechanisms  of the gas  phase  reactions  of
the  hydroxyl  radical with  organic  compounds  under  atmospheric  conditions.
Chem. Rev.  85: 69-193.

Barsottl, B.  and G.  Crottl.   1949.   Eplleptlform attacks  as  manifestations
of professional  poisoning with  trlmethylenetrlnltramlne.   Med.  Lavoro.   40:
107-112.  (Taken from Chem. Abs. 43:  8682.)

Bentley,  R.E.,  J.W.  Oean,  S.J.  Ells,  T.A.  Holllster  and  G.A.   LeBlanc.
1979.    Laboratory   evaluation   of   the  toxlclty   of   cyclotrlmethylene
trlnltramlne (ROX)  to aquatic organisms.  NTIS AD-A061730.   99 p.

Burdette, L.J.,  L.L.  Cook  and  R.S.  Dyer.  1988.   Convulsant properties  of
cyclotr1methlenetrln1tram1ne  (RDX):  Spontaneous,  audlogenlc  and  amygdaloid
kindled seizure activity.  Toxlcol. Appl. Pharmacol.   92: "436-444.

5940H                                -68-                             07/28/89

-------
Carroll, J.W.,  C.P.T.'Thomas, T.L.  Gulnivan,  R.M. Tuggl, K.E.  Williams  and
D.L. Lillian.   1979.  Assessment  of hazardous  air pollutants from  disposal
of munitions  in  a  prototype  fluidlzed  bed Incinerator.   Am.  Ind. Hyg.  Assoc.
J.  40: 147-158.

Chemllne.  1989.   Online.   National Library of Medicine chemline  database.
03/02/89.

Cholakls,  J.M.,  L.C.K.   Wong,  D.L., et  al.   1980.  Mammalian  toxicological
evaluation of RDX.  NTIS AO-A092 531.  158 p.

Conney,  A.    1967.   Pharmacological   Implications   of  microsomal   enzyme
induction.   Pharmacol.  Rev.  19:  317-366.  (Cited in Schneider et al.,  1977.)

Crockett,  P.W.,  B.  KHian,  K.S.  Crump  and  R.B.  Howe.  1985.   Description
Methods  for  Using  the  Data  from  Dlsslmilas   Experiments  to   Locate  a
No-Adverse-Toxic-Effects  Region   in the  Dose-Duration  Plane.   Prepared  by
K.S. Crump and Company,  Inc.,  under Contract No.  6807-007  for  Environmental
Criteria and Assessment Office, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, OH.

Dllley,  J.V., C.A.  Tyson  and G.W.  Newell.   1979.  Mammalian  toxicological
evaluatiion of TNT wastewaters.   II. Acute  and subacute mammalian  toxlcity
of TNT and LAP mixture.   NTIS ADA080-957.
5940H
-69-
06/26/89

-------
Durkin,  P.  and  W. Meylan.   1988.   User's  Guide  to  DZPLOT:   A Program  for
Dose/Duration  Graphs,    Prepared  by  Chemical  Hazard  Assessment  Division,
Syracuse   Research   Corporation   under   Contract   No.   68-C8-0004   for
Environmental Criteria and Assessment  Office,  U.S.  EPA,  Cincinnati,  OH.

Eisenrelch,  S.J.,  B.B.  Looney  and J.D.  Thornton.   1981.  Airborne  organic
contaminants of the Great Lakes  ecosystem.  Env.  Tech.  15(1):  30-38.

French,  J.E., S.L. Bradley,  N.R.  Schneider, M.E.  Andersen  and  L.J.  Jenkins
Jr.  1976.   Cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine  Induced  ultrastructural  changes in
rat liver and kidney.  Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.   37:  122.

Furedl-Machacek, M.,  B.S. Levine and P.M. Lish.   1987.   Determination  of the
chronic  mammalian  toxicological  effects of RDX.   Acute  dermal  toxicity test
of hexehydro-l,3,5-trinitro-l,3,5-triaz1ne  (RDX)  In  rabbits.    NTIS  AD-A174
710.

Gleason, M.N.,  R.E.  Gosselin,  H.C.  Hodge  and R.P.  Smith.   1969.   Clinical
toxicology  of commercial  products.   3rd  Ed.   Sec.  II.   The   Williams  and
Nilkins  Co.  Baltimore, MD.  (Cited in Taylor,  1975.)

Guo,  L., H.  Xu,  Y. Chen and Y.  Chang.  1985.   Distribution  and metabolism of
3H-RDX  in  mice.   Zhonghua Laodong  Weisheng Zhlyebing Zazhl.   3(6):  335-339.
(Taken from Chem. Abstr. 105/073861c>
Hansch,  C.  and  A.J.  Leo.   1985.   Medchem project.   Issue No.  26.   Pomona
College, Claremont, CA.
5940H
-70-
06/26/89

-------
Hart,  E.R.   1974.    Subacute  toxicity  of  RDX  and  TNT  in  dogs.   NTIS
AD-A035717.  200 p.

Hart, E.R.  1976.  Two year feeding study in rats.   NTIS AD-A040 161.

Hathaway, J.A. and  C.R.  Buck.  1977.  Absence  of  health  hazards  associated
with RDX manufacture and use.  J. Occup. Med. -19:  269-272.

Hoffsommer,  J.C. and  J.M.   Rosen.   1972.   Analysis  of  explosives  in  sea
water.  Bull. Env. Cont.  Tox.   7: 177-181.

Hoffsommer,  J.C.  and J.M.  Rosen.   1973.   Hydrolysis  of  explosives  in  sea
water.  Bull. Env. Cont.  Tox.  10: 78-79.

Hoffsommer, J.C., D.J. Glover and J.M. Rosen.  1972.  Analysis of explosives
in  sea  water  and  in  ocean  floor  sediment  and fauna.   White Oak,  Silver
Springs, MD.  Naval  Ordinance Lab.  p. 16.  NTIS-AD 757778.

Hollander,  A.I.  and E.M. Colbach.   1969.   Composition  C-4 induces  seizures:
Reprot of five cases.  USARV  Medical Bull.  40: 31-35.

Howe and Crump.   1982.  Global 82; A  computer  program to extrapolate quanta!
animal  toxicity  data  to  low  doses.   Prepared  for  Office   of  Carcinogen
Standards, OSHA,  by Science  Research Systems, Ruston, LA.
5940H
-71-
06/26/89

-------
Jenkins,  T.F.,  D.C.  Leggett,  C.L.  Grant  and C.F.  Bauer.   1986.   Reversed
phase high  performance liquid chromatographk determination of  nitroorganlcs
In munitions wastewater.   Anal.  Chem.   58:  170-175.

Kaplan, A.S., C.F.  Berghout  and  A. Peczenik.   1965.   Human  Intoxication  from
RDX.  Arch. Environ. Health.   10: 877-883.

Kayser, E.G.  and N.E. BurMnson.   1988.   Migration  of  explosives  in  soil:
Analysis  of  RDX.   TNT  and  Teryl  from  a  carbon  "C lysimeter  study.   J.
Energ. Mater.  6: 45-71,

Levlne, B.S.,  E.M.  Furedi,  D.E.  Gordon,  J.M. Burns  and P.M.  Lish.   1981.
Thirteen    week   oral   (diet)   toxicity   study  of   trinitrotoluene  (TNT),
hexahydro-l,3,5-trinitro-l,3,5-triazine (ROX)  and  TNT/RDX  mixtures  in  the
Fischer 344 rat.  NTIS AD-A108447.  363 p.

Levine,  B.S.,  E.M.  Furedi,  V.S.  Rac,  D.E.   Gordon  and P.M.  Lish.   1984.
Determination fo the  chronic mammalian toxicological  effects of RDX: (Twenty
four   month  chronic  toxiclty/carcinogenicity   study   of   hexagydro-1,3,5-
trin1tro-1,3,5-tr1az1ne  (RDX)  in  the Fischer  344 rat.)   NTIS  AD-A160774.
Vol.  1.  347 p.
5940H                                -72-                             06/26/89

-------
llsh,  P.M.,  B.S.  Levlne,  E.M.  Furedl,  J.M.  Sagartz  and  V.S. Rac.   1984.
Determination of the chronic  mammalian toxkologlcal  effects of RDX.   Twenty
four month  chronic toxlclty/carcinogeniclty study of  hexahydro-1,3,5-trlni-
tro-1,3,5 trlazine  (RDX)  in  the  B6C3F1  hybrid mouse.   Phase  6.   NTIS  AD
A181766.  364 p.

L1u, D.H.,  R.J.  Spanggord,  H.C.  Bailey,  H.S.  Oavitz  and  D.   Jones.   1984.
Toxlclty  of  TNT  wastewaters to  aquatic organisms:  Acute  toxldty  of  LAP
wastewater and 2,4.6-trinitrotoluene.   NTIS AD-A142144.   85 p.

MacPhall,  R.C.,   Q.D.  Walker  and   L.L.   Cook.    1985.    Neurotoxlcity  of
cylortrimethylenetrinitramine (RDX).   NTIS AD-A168-266.   65 p.

Mantel,  N.   and  M.A.  Schneideman.    1975.   Estimating  "safe"  levels,  a
hazardous undertaking.  Cancer Res.   35:  1379-1386.

Martin,  and  Hart*.   1974.   Subacute  toxicity of  RDX  and TNT 1n  monkeys.
NTIS AD-A044 650.

McConnell, W.I.  and  R.T.   FUnn.   1946.   Summary of  twenty two trinibtoto-
luene  fatalatles  in  World  War II.  J. Ind.  Hyg.  28:  76.   (Cited  In Taylor,
1975.)

McCormlck,  N.G.,  J.H.  Cornell  and  A.M.   Kaplan.   1981.   Biodegratlon  of
hexahydro-1,3,5-tr1n1tro-l,3,5-triazine.   Appl.  Env.  M1crob1ol.  42:  817-823.
*No Initials provided.
5940H
-73-
06/26/89

-------
Merrill, S.L.  1968.  Ingestlon of an  explosive  material,  composition C-4:  A
report of two cases.  USARV Medical Bull.  40: 5-11.

NIOSH  (National  Institute  for  Occupational  Safety  and  Health).    1988.
National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES).

NTP  (National  Toxicology  Program),    n.d.   Historical  control  data.    NTP
Bulletin 10.

OSHA  (Occupational  Safety  and  Health Administration).   1989.   29 CFR  Part
1910.  Air Contaminants: Final Rule.   54: 2577.

Osmon,  J.I.  and  R.E.   Klausmeler.    1973.    The  mlcroblal  degradation  of
expolslves.  Dev. Ind. M1crob1ol.   14: 247-252.

Richard,  J.J.  and  6.A.  Junk.  1986.   Determination of  munitions 1n  water
using macroretlcular resins.  Am.  Chem. Soc.  58: 723-725.

Ryon, M.6.,  B.C.  Pal, S.S. Talmage  and  R.H.   Ross.   1984.   Database  assess-
ment  of  the health  and environmental effects  of  munition  production  waste
production.  Final  Report.  Oak Ridge, TN.  Oak Ridge  Natl.  Lab.   p. 22-23;
37; 101; 110-113; 116-117; 119; 123;  125; 127; 131; 133.  NTIS DE84-016512.

SANSS (Structure and Nomenclature Search System).  1989.  Online.   03/02/89.

Sax,  N.I.  and  R.J.  Lewis.   1987.   Hawley's  Condensed  Chemical  Dictionary.
11th ed.  Van Nostrand Relnhold Co.,  New York, NY.   p. 338.
                                                    b

5940H                                -74-                             10/03/89

-------
Schneider, N.R.  and  M.E.  Andersen.  1975.  Toxldty and  tissue  distribution
of cyclotrlmethylenetrlnltramlne (RDX).   Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.   33:  198.

Schneider,  N.R.,  S.L.  Bradley  and  M.E.  Anderson.   1977.   Toxicology  of
cyclotrlmethylenetrlnltramlne:   Distribution  and  metabolism In  the rat  and
the miniature swine.   Toxlcol.  Appl. Pharmacol.   39:  531-541.

Schneider, N.R.,  S.L.  Bradley  and M.E.  Andersen,   1978.  The  distribution
and  metabolism  of  cyclotrlmethylenetrlnltramlne (RDX)  1n  the  rat  after
subchronlc administration.  Toxlcol. Appl. Pharmacol.   46: 163-172.

Simmon,   V.F.,   R.J.   Spanggord,   S.   Eckford  and   V.  McClurg.    1977.
Mutagenlclty  of  some  munition  wastewater  chemicals  and  chlorine  test  kit
reagents.  Final Report.  NTIS Doc. AD-A057-680.  p.  1-37; 67-69.

Small  M.J.  and  D.H. Rosenblatt.   1974.  Munitions  production  products  of
potential concern  as waterborne pollutants Phase  II.   In;  Tech. Rep.  7404.
Aberdeen, MD.   U.S.  Army Medical  Bloenglneerlng  Res.  Devel.  Lab.  p.  3-96.
NTIS AD919031.

Spaldlng, R.F.  and  J.U.  Fulton.   1988.   Groundwater  munition  residues  and
nitrate near Grand Island, Nebraska, U.S.A.  J.  Contam.  Hydrol.   2:  139-153.

Spanggord, R.J.,  T.   Mill,  T.W. Chou,  H.R.  Mabey,  J.H.  Smith  and S.  Lee.
1980a.    Environmental    fate   studies   on   certain   munition  wastewater
constituents.   Final report Phase I Literature  Review.   Fort  Detrlck,  MO.
U.S. Army Med. Res. and Develop. Command.  SRI  Project No. LSU-7934.

5940H                                -75-                             10/02/89

-------
Spanggord,  R.J.,  T. Mill,  T.W. Chou,  H.R. Nabey,  J.H. Smith  and S.  Lee.
1980b.    Environmental    fate   studies   on   certain   munition   wastewater
constituents.  Final report  Phase  II Laboratory studies.   Fort  Detrlck,  MD.
U.S.  Army  Med.  Res.  Oevel.    p.  89.   SRI Project  No.   NTIS  AD  A099256.
LSU-7934.

Spanggord,  R.J.,  W.R.  Habey,   T.  Mill,  et  al.  .1983.   Environmental  fate
studies  on  certain  munitions   wastewater  constituents.  Fort  Detrlck,  MD.
U.S. Army Ned. Res. Devel.  SRI Project No.  LSU-7934.   NTIS  AD A138550.

Spector,  M.S.  1956.   Handbook of Toxicology.   Vol.  1.  W.B. Saunders  Co.,
Philadelphia, PA.   (Cited In Taylor,  1975.)

Stone.  H.J.. T.L.  Paletta,  E.M.  Helman,  J.I.  Brude  and  J.H.  Knepshleld.
1969.   Toxic effects following Ingestlon of  C-4  plastic  explosive.   Arch.
Intern. Med.  124: 726-730.

Swann,   R.L.,  O.A.   Laskowskl,  P.J.  McCall,  K.   Vander  Kuy   and   H.J.
Dlshburger.   1983.   A  rapid method  for  the estimation of  the  environmental
parameters  octanol/water  partition   coefficient,   soil  sorptlon  constant,
water to air ratio and water solubility.  Res.  Rev.   85: 17-28.

Taylor,  G.D.  1975.   Military dog  training  aids:  Toxlclty  and  treatment.
NTIS AD/A-006 438.

TSCAPP.   1989.  Computer  print-out of  non-confidential  production  data  from
TSCA Inventory.  OPTS,  CID,  U.S. EPA, Washington, O.C.
5940H                                -76-                             07/28/89

-------
U.S.  EPA.   1980.   Guidelines  and  Methodology Used  1n  the  Preparation  of
Health  Effect  Assessment  Chapters  of  the  Consent  Decree  Water  Criteria
Documents.   Federal Register.  45:(231) 79347-79357.

U.S.  EPA.  1984.   Methodology  and Guidelines for  Ranking Chemicals  Based  on
Chronic loxldty  Data.   Prepared by  the  Office  of Health and  Environmental
Assessment, Environmental Criteria  and  Assessment  Office, Cincinnati,  OH for
the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC.

U.S.   EPA.    1986a.    Methodology   for    Evaluating   Reportable   Quantity
Adjustments   Pursuant   to   CERCLA  Section   102.   Prepared   by   Carcinogen
Assessment  Group,  Office  of  health   and  Environmental  Assessment  for  the
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington,  DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1986b.   Guidelines  for   Carcinogen   Risk  Assessment.   Federal
Register.  51(185): 33992-34003.

U.S.  EPA.   1986c.  Reference  Values  for  Risk  Assessment.   Prepared  by the
Office  of  Health  and  Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental Criteria and
Assessment Office,  Cincinnati,  OH for  the  Office  of  Solid Waste,  Washington,
DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1988a.   Health  Advisory  Document for  Hexahydro-l,3,5-tr1n1tro-
1,3,5-tMazlne  (RDX).  Office of  Drinking Water,  Washington,  DC.
5940H                                -77-                             10/05/89

-------
U.S. EPA.  1988b.  Integrated Risk Information System  (IRIS):  Reference  Dose
(RfD)  for  Oral  Exposure  for Hexahydro-1,3,5-tr1n1tro-1,3,5-tr1az1ne  (RDX).
Online.  (Verification  date  04/20/88.)  Office  of Health and  Environmental
Assessment, Environmental  Criteria and Assessment Office,  Cincinnati,  OH.

U.S. EPA/QWRS  (Environmental Protection Agency/Office  of Water  Regulations
and  Standards).   1986.   Guidelines   for  Deriving Numerical  National Hater
Quality  Criteria  for the  Protection of Aquatic Organisms  and Their Uses.
U.S. EPA, Washington, DC.   NTIS PB 85-227049/XAB.  p. 22-58;  98.

von  Oettlngen, W.F.,  D.D.  Donahue,  H.  Yagoda,  A.R.  Monaco and M.R.  Harris.
1949.   Toxldty  and   potential   dangers   of   cyclotrlmethylenetrlnltramlne
(RDX).   J.  Indus. Hyg. Toxlcol.   31:  21-31.

Whong,  W.Z., N.D.  Spedner and G.S.  Edwards.   1980.   Mutagenlc activity  of
tetryl,  a   nltroaromatlc   explosive,  In   three  mlcroblal   test   systems.
Toxlcol.  Lett.   5: 11-17.

Wlndholz,  E.M.   1983.  The  Merck  Index.   10th  ed.   Merck  and  Co., Inc.,
Rahway, NJ.  p. 392-393.

Woody,  R.C.,  G.L.  Kearns, M.A.  Brewster,  C.P.  Turley,  G.B. Sharp and  R.S.
Lake.  1986.   The  neurotoxlclty of  cyclotrlmethylenetrlnltramlne (RDX)  1n  a
child:   A  clinical   and   pharmacokenetlc   evaluation.    0.   Toxlcol.  CUn.
Toxlcol.   24: 305-319.
5940H                                -78-                             10/05/89

-------
                                  APPENDIX A

    This  HEED  Is  based  on  data  Identified  by  computerized  literature

searches of the following:

                   CHENLINE
                   TSCATS
                   CASR online (U.S. EPA Chemical Activities Status Report)
                   TOXLINE
                   TOXLIT
                   TOXLIT 65
                   RTECS
                   OHM TADS
                   STORET
                   SRC Environmental Fate Data Bases
                   SANSS
                   AQUIRE
                   TSCAPP
                   NTIS
                   Federal Register
                   CAS ONLINE (Chemistry and Aquatic)
                   HSDB
                   SCISEARCH
                   Federal Research In Progress
These  searches  were  conducted  In  Hay,  1988,  and  the following  secondary

sources were reviewed:
       ACGIH  (American Conference  of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
       1986.   Documentation of  the  Threshold  Limit  Values  and  Biological
       Exposure Indices.  5th ed.  Cincinnati, OH.

       ACGIH  (American Conference  of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
       1987.   TLVs:  Threshold Limit  Values  for  Chemical  Substances  In  the
       Work   Environment   adopted  by   ACGIH  with    Intended   Changes   for
       1987-1988.  Cincinnati,  OH.  114 p.

       Clayton,  G.D.  and  F.E.   Clayton,  Ed.    1981.   Patty's  Industrial
       Hygiene and Toxicology.   3rd rev.  ed.  Vol. 2A.   John  Wiley and Sons,
       NY.  2878 p.

       Clayton,  G.D.  and  F.E.   Clayton,  Ed.    1981.   Patty's  Industrial
       Hygiene and Toxicology.   3rd rev.  ed.  Vol. 28.   John  Wiley and Sons,
       NY.  p. 2879-3816.

       Clayton,  G.O.  and  F.E.   Clayton,  Ed.    1982.   Patty's  Industrial
       Hygiene and Toxicology.   3rd rev.  ed.  Vol. 2C.   John  Wiley and Sons,
       NY.  p. 3817-5112.
5940H                                A-l                            07/28/89

-------
       Grayson,  M.  and  D. Eckroth,  Ed.   1978-84.  K1rk-0thmer  Encyclopedia
       of Chemical Technology,  3rd ed.   John W.I ley and Sons.  NY.   23 Volumes.
       Hamilton,   A.  and  H.L.  Hardy.    1974.   Industrial  Toxicology.   3rd
       edition.   Publishing  Sciences  Group,  Inc.,   MA.  575 p.
       IARC (International Agency  for  Research on Cancer).  IARC  Monographs
       on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of  Chemicals  to  Humans.   IARC,
       Lyons,  France:  WHO.
       Jaber,  H.M.,  M.R.  Mabey,  A.T.  Lieu,  T.U. Chou  and H.L.  Johnson.
       1984.    Data   acquisition  for   environmental  transport  and   fate
       screening   for  compounds of  Interest to  the   Office  of Solid  Waste.
       EPA-600/6-84-010.    (NTIS  PB84-243906)  Menlo  Park,  CA:   SRI  Inter-
       national.
       NTP {National  Toxicology  Program).   1988.  Toxicology Research  and
       Testing Program.   Chemicals on Standard Protocol.   Management Status.
       Ouellette,   R.P.   and   J.A.  King.   1977.   Chemical  Week   Pesticide
       Register.   McGraw-Hill  Book Co.,  NY.
       Sax, I.N.    1984.   Dangerous Properties of  Industrial Materials.   6th
       edition.   Van Nostrand  Relnhold  Co.,  NY.
       SRI  (Stanford  Research  Institute).   1987.   Directory  of  Chemical
       Producers.   Stanford,  CA.
       U.S.  EPA.   1986.   Report  on Status  Report   1n   the  Special  Review
       Program,    Registration   Standards   Program  and   the   Data   Call   In
       Programs.    Registration Standards  and  the Data Call  1n  Programs.
       Office of  Pesticide Programs,  Washington,  DC.
       USITC    (United   States   International  Trade  Commission).    1986.
       Synthetic   Organic  Chemicals.   U.S.  Production  and Sales, 1985,  USITC
       Publication 1892.   Washington, DC.
       Verschueren, K.    1983.   Handbook of  Environmental  Data  on  Organic
       Chemicals.   2nd ed.  Van Nostrand Relnhold  Co., NY.
       Worthing,   C.R.  and S.B. Walker,  Ed.  1983.   The Pesticide  Manual.
       British Crop Protection Council.   695 p.
       Wlndholz,   M. Ed.   1983.  The Merck  Index.   10th  ed.   Merck  and  Co.,
       Inc.,  Rahway, NJ.
5940H                                A-2                            07/28/89

-------
    In addition,  approximately  30  compendia of  aquatic  toxidty data  were

reviewed, including the following:


       Battelle's Columbus Laboratories.   1971.  Water Quality  Criteria  Data
       Book.   Volume  3.   Effects  of  Chemicals on  Aquatic  Life.   Selected
       Data from  the  Literature through  1968.   Prepared  for  the  U.S.  EPA
       under  Contract  No.  68-01-0007.   Washington.  DC.

       Johnson,  W.W. and  M.T.  Finley.   1980.  Handbook of Acute  Toxidty of
       Chemicals to Fish  and Aquatic  Invertebrates.   Summaries  of  Toxicity
       Tests   Conducted  at Columbia  National Fisheries Research  Laboratory.
       1965-1978.   United States  Dept.  Interior,  Fish  and  Wildlife  Serv.
       Res. Publ. 137,  Washington,  DC.

       McKee,  J.E.  and H.W. Wolf.   1963.   Water Quality Criteria.   2nd ed.
       Prepared for the Resources  Agency  of California,  State  Water  Quality
       Control Board.   Publ.  No. 3-A.

       Pimental, D.   1971.  Ecological Effects of Pesticides  on Non-Target
       Species.   Prepared for the U.S.  EPA, Washington, DC.   PB-269605.

       Schneider,  B.A.   1979.    Toxicology  Handbook.   Mammalian  and  Aquatic
       Data.   Book  1:  Toxicology  Data.   Office of  Pesticide Programs,  U.S.
       EPA, Washington, DC.  EPA 540/9-79-003:  NTIS PB 80-196876.
 5940H                                 A-3                             06/09/89

-------
                                 APPENDIX B
        Cancer  Data  Sheets  for  Derivation  of  a  qt for Oral  Exposure

Compound:   RDX
Reference:  Ush et al.,  1984
Specles/straln/sex:  mouse,  B6C3F1, female
Length of exposure (le)  • 105 weeks
Length of experiment (Le) » 105 weeks
Llfespan of animal (L) - 105 weeks
Tumor site and type:   liver, adenoma/carcinoma
Route/vehicle:  oral, diet
Animal
Dose8
(mg/kg/day)
0
K5
7.0
35
107"
Human qt « 0
TWA Animal
Body Weight"
(kq)
0.0356
0.0361
0.0368
0.0355
0.0318
.0535374 (mg/kg/day) '
Equivalent
Human Dosec
(mg/kg/day)
0
0.120
0.565
2.79
8.23
le
Incidence
No. Responding/No. Tested
(or Examined)
1/65
5/62
9/64
12/64
6/31

'Data provided by Investigators
"Calculated  as  average of  body weight measurements  taken  every  eighth week
 throughout the experiment
'Estimated by multiplying  the  animal  dose by the  cube  root of the  ratio of
the animal to reference human body weight of 70 kg (U.S. EPA, 1980)
'Mice dosed  at  175 mg/kg/day  for  10  weeks followed  by  100  mg/kg/day for 95
weeks
"Because  a  human dose  was estimated  and  entered Into  the Global  82  (Howe
and Crump,  1982) computer  program,  the  95%  lower confidence  limit on dose
and the qT are gor humans rather than for experimental animals.
6204H
B-l
06/16/89

-------
































X
o
DC
fc
0 O

X
«-i Ol

z 3
U "O
a.
u
13
|









































Ol
U

o»

ai

Ol
Of





• -
^
o
o
ac









4,
u
4i
H-
**»
U











0)
I/I
X
Ul



VI
Oi


01
in

















:
sO *£ *~
* § * ^
*— ^ 

r r oi ""

i» n»
O 0 O — »*  > Ol VI
oi oi c •-
-1-1 < _l
X X
IB H
•N. V
O Q O Ol Ol
*-l l-t *+ J£ JC
O> Ol ^ *

po fl
0 0
e c
o a
* "S
i i
c c
Ol Ol
"S "S
*•» 4-1
I/I tfl Ml tf»
O— o — '
O O a k. ui k. in
—, _i .-, a. o a o
v. u
b Ol 4. Ol
O T3 O T3
•*•••" **--•*
-JO -JO
bJ E u E

Z JC Z nfi"

J£ M
Oi CU
tf> in
o o
u u.
O O

>s >•
O Q ^3 4 ^0
o> ai

Xw V O O
Ol Oi O O
f> (T
o o

^> +J
o a o < TS * •

«j >.
U -f
> >< z ••• c
a ^ 4J < c —
x ••- oil — 3 o u
UJ U L. O O !• *-
•^ 3 '^ J— ^
CU c tn u c ujuu
O •- dl O — Ol —1
— c cr a c en ace
*JOuO XO u O  f t | Qg[ g^ ^ flfj
T*.
CO
O

^t
VD
O
























































>0

4
^


c
Oi

•—
^^

c

X
u r^
O"
O <-

C-l

-------
                                 APPENDIX D
              DOSE/DURATION  RESPONSE  GRAPHS  FOR  EXPOSURE  TO  RDX
0.1.   DISCUSSION
    Dose/duration-response graphs for  oral  exposure to  RDX generated  by the
method of  Crockett et  al.  (1985)  using the computer  software  by  Durkln and
Meylan (1988) developed under  contract  to  ECAO-Clnn1nnat1  are  presented  In
Figures D-l  and D-2.   Data used to generate  these graphs are presented  in
Section  D.2.   In  the  generation  of  these,  figures,  all   responses  are
classified as adverse  (FEL, AEL,  or  LOAEL)  or non-adverse  (NOEL or NOAEL)
for  plotting.   For oral  exposure,   the  ordlnate  expresses  dosage  as human
equivalent dose.   The  animal  dosage in mg/kg/day  1s  multiplied by the cube
root  of  the   ratio  of  the  animal :human body  weight  to adjust for  species
differences  In  basal  metabolic rate  (Mantel  and  Schneiderman,  1975).   The
result is  then multiplied  by  70  kg,   the  reference  human  body  weight,  to
express the human equivalent dose as mg/day for a 70 kg  human.
    The Boundary  for  Adverse  Effects  (solid  line) is  drawn  by  identifying
the  lowest adverse  effect dose or concentration  at the shortest  duration of
exposure at  which  an  adverse effect occurred.  From this  point,  an  Infinite
line  Is  extended  upward  parallel  to  the  dose axis.   The  starting point is
then  connected  to  the lowest   adverse  effect  dose  or  concentration  at the
next   longer  duration of   exposure  that  has  an  adverse  effect  dose  or
concentration equal to or   lower  than  the  previous  one.   This  process  is
continued  to  the   lowest  adverse  effect  dose or  concentration.    From this
point a  line Is extended to the  right  parallel  to the duration  axis.  The
Region of Adverse  Effects lies  above the Adverse  Effects Boundary.
 6201H                                 D-l                             06/22/89

-------
 ,l\
 91
 \
 n
 v
 SI
 0'
 hi
 a
 z
           ft.0001
(Oral Exposure)
0.001             0.01              0.1

  HUNAN EQUIV DURATION (fraction  lifcspan)

             ENVELOP NETHOP
                                          FIGURE D-l

                  Dose/Duration - Response Graph for Oral  Exposure  to RDX,
                                        Envelope Method

             KEY:        F = FEL
                        A - AEL
                        n = NOAEL
                        N = NOEL

         Solid Line  - Adverse Effects Boundary
         Dotted Line = No Adverse Effects Boundary
         6201H
                  D-2
                                                                              06/16/89

-------
      ieeee
 il
 0'
 in


 I
       1890  r
           8.9001

-------
    Using the  envelope  method,  the Boundary  for  No Adverse  Effects  (dashed
line)  Is  drawn  by   Identifying  the  highest  no  adverse  effects  dose  or
concentration.  From  this point,  a line  parallel to  the  duration axis  Is
extended  to  the  dose or  concentration axis.   The starting  point Is  then
connected to the next lower or  equal no adverse effect  dose or concentration
at  a longer  duration  of exposure.   When  this   process  can  no  longer  be
continued, a  line 1s  dropped parallel  to  the dose or  concentration axis  to
the duration axis.  The  No Adverse Effects Region  lies  below the  No  Adverse
Effects  Boundary.  At either  ends  of  the  graph  between  the  Adverse  Effects
and  No  Adverse Effects  boundaries  are  Regions  of Ambiguity.  The area  (1f
any)  resulting from  Intersection  of   the  Adverse  Effects  and  No  Adverse
Effects boundaries Is  defined as the Region of Contradiction.
    In the censored data  method, all no adverse effect  points located  In the
Region of  Contradiction   are  dropped  from consideration  and  the No  Adverse
Effect boundary Is redrawn so that  It  does  not  Intersect the  Adverse  Effects
boundary and  no Region of Contradiction Is  generated.   This  method  results
In the most conservative definition of  the No Adverse Effects  region.
    Figure D-l  presents  the  dose-duration response  graph  generated by  the
envelope method.   The Adverse  Effects  Boundary  Is  defined by  four  points,
corresponding to convulsions and death  In miniature swine at  one dose  of 100
mg/day   (Schneider  et  al.,  1977)  (rec  #36),   mouse  LD5Q  of   80   mg/kg
(Cholakls  et   al.,  1980)  (rec  #31),   convulsions  and   CNS disturbances  1n
monkeys  at  dosages  of  10  mg/kg/day  for  90  days  (Hart,  1974)  (rec  #22),
maternal  lethality at  2  mg/kg/day In rat  developmental  toxlclty  studies
(Angerhofer et al., 1986; Cholakls  et  al.,  1980)  (rec #23,  26), reduced body
weight gain  In a  90-day study  In  rats (Levlne  et  al., 1981)  (rec #8)  and
prostatlc  Inflammation  and  splenic  hemoslderosls  seen  In  rats  at  1.5
6201H
D-4
07/28/89

-------
mg/kg/day  for  105 weeks  (Levlne  et  al., 1984)  (rec #2).   The  No  Effects
Boundary  Is  defined by  two points,  one  representing no  effects seen  In  a
mouse  study  at dose levels  <145 mg/kg for 90  days (Cholakls et  al.,  1980)
(rec  #13)  and  the  other  representing the Hart  (1976)  study  with  rats  In
which  no adverse  effects  were seen at dosages  <10  mg/kg/day  (rec  # 7).   The
Region  of  contradiction  contains  NOAELs  In  3-month  studies  In dogs  (rec
#20), mice (rec #12, 13) and rats (rec #10, 17).  .
    When  the  graph  1s  redrawn  to eliminate  the   Region  of  Contradiction
(Figure  0-2),   the  No  Adverse  Effects  Boundary Is defined  by  the  points
representing the  dose level  of 10 mg/kg/day given to rats  1n  a  behavioral
study  (McPhall et al., 1985)  (rec  #15),  50 mg/kg/day 1n  a  reproduction study
In  rats (Cholakls  et  al.,  1980)  and 1.5 mg/kg/day given  to mice  for  105
weeks  (L1sh et al., 1984) (rec #4).
D.2.    DATA USED TO GENERATE DOSE/DURATION-RESPONSE  GRAPHS
D.2.1.   Inhalation   Exposure.    Inhalation   data   were   Insufficient   to
generation of dose/duration-response graphs.
0.2.2.   ORAL EXPOSURE
Chemical Name:    RDX
CAS Number:       121-82-4
Document Title:   Health and Environmental Effects Document on ROX
Document Number:  pending
Document Date:    pending
Document Type:    HEED

6201H                                D-5                            07/28/89

-------
RECORD #1
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Both
NOEL
Food
                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  SHe of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
Dose: 0.300
Duration Exposure: 105.0 Weeks
Duration Observation: 105.0 Weeks
                          150
                          0
                          DEATH
                          BODY
                          10
                  Comment:      Doses given 0.3,  1.5,  8.0,  40 mg/kg/day.
                               effects seen at  this  dose

                  Citation:    Levlne et al.. 1984
                                                       No
RECORD #2:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Both
LOAEL
Food
Dose: 1.500
Duration Exposure: 105.0 Weeks
Duration Observation: 105.0 Weeks

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          150
                          75
                          OTHER
                          OTHER
                          5
                  Comment:      Doses of 0.3,  1.5,  8,  40  mg/kg/day.   Prostate
                               Inflammation 1n males  at  this  dose.   Effects
                               observed at 8.0 less  severe  that  at  1.5--  In-
                               clude reduced  body  weight gain, hepatomegaly

                  Citation:     Levlne et al.,  1984
RECORD #3:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Both
FEL
Food
Dose: 40.000
Duration Exposure: 105.0 Weeks
Duration Observation: 105.0 Weeks

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  SHe of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          150
                          NR
                          DEATH
                          BODY
                          10
                  Comment:      Highest dose of  the  study  80% mortality

                  Citation:    Levlne et al.,  1984
6201H
                   D-6
                                     07/28/89

-------
RECORD #4:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
             Mice
             Both
             NOAEL
             Food
                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
Dose: 1.500
Duration Exposure: 105.0 Neeks
Duration Observation: 105.0 Weeks
                          170
                          0
                          WGTNS
                          BODY
                          4
                  Comment:      Doses of 1.5,  7.0,  35,  175/100 mg/kg/day,
                               effects seen at this  dose

                  Citation:     Lish et al., 1984
                                                        No
RECORD #5:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Mice
Both
LOAEL
Food
Dose: 7.000
Duration Exposure: 105.0 Weeks
Duration Observation: 105.0 Weeks

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          170
                          NR
                          METAB-
                          OTHER
                          2
Comment:
Citation:
             Doses of 1.5, 7
             cholesterolemia
                                              ,  35,  175/100 mg/kg/day hyper-
                                               in females at this dose
                               Lish et al., 1984
RECORD #6:








Species: Mice
Sex: Both
Effect: AEL
Route: Food
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:
Dose: 35.000
Duration Exposure: 105
Duration Observation:

170
NR
DEGEN
TESTE
6

.0 Weeks
105.0 Weeks






                  Comment:     Doses of 1.5, 7, 35, 175/100 mg/kg/day.  At
                               this dose,  hepatomegaly in females, testicu-
                               lar degeneration in males highest dose
                               produced high mortality, was reduced

                  Citation:    Lish et al., 1984
6201H
                   D-7
                                                  06/22/89

-------
RECORD #7:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Both
NOAEL
Food
                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
Dose: 10.000
Duration Exposure: 104.0 Weeks
Duration Observation: 104.0 Weeks
                          200
                          0
                          WGTNS
                          BODY
                          4
                  Comment:     Doses of 1,  3.1,  10 mg/kg/day.
                               effects seen at any dose level

                  Citation:    Hart, 1976
                                             No adverse
RECORD #8:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Both
LOAEL
Food
Dose: 10.000
Duration Exposure: 90.0 Days
Duration Observation: 90.0 Days

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          20
                          10
                          WGTDC
                          BODY
                          4
                  Comment:     Doses of 10,  30,  100,  300,  600 mg/kg/day.
                               Body weight gain  reduced 6% In males,  also
                               biochemical changes 30 mg/kg/day produced
                               changes In body weights also

                  Citation:    Levlne et al.,  1981
RECORD #9:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Both
PEL
Food
Dose: 100.000
Duration Exposure: 90.0 Days
Duration Observation: 90.0 Days

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          20
                          NR
                          DEATH
                          BODY
                          10
                  Comment:     Doses of 10, 30, 100,  300,  600 mg/kg/day High
                               mortality at this dose and  at higher  doses

                  Citation:    Levlne et al., 1981
6201H
                   D-8
                                     07/28/89

-------
RECORD #10:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Both
NOAEL
Food
                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
Dose: 28.000
Duration Exposure: 90.0  Days
Duration Observation: 90.0 Days
                          20
                          0
                          WGTNS
                          BODY
                          4
                  Comment:     Doses of 10, 14, 20, 28, 40 mg/kg/day.  No
                               adverse effects seen at 10, 14, 20, and 28
                               mg/kg/day

                  Citation:    Cholafcis et all, 1980
RECORD #11:








Species: Rats
Sex: Both
Effect: LOAEL
Route: Food
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:
Dose: 40.000
Duration Exposure: 90
Duration Observation:

20
NR
WGTDC
BODY
4

.0 Days
90.0 Days






                  Comment:     Doses of 10, 14, 20, 28, and 40 mg/kg/day.
                               Dose related weight decrease compared to con-
                               trols at this dose.  No other significant
                               adverse effects seen

                  Citation:    Cholakis et al., 1980
RECORD #12:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Mice
Both
NOAEL
Food
                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
Dose: 40.000
Duration Exposure: 90.0 Days
Duration Observation: 90.0 Days
                          20
                          0
                          HGTNS
                          BODY
                          4
                  Comment:     Doses of 10, 14, 20, 28, 40 mg/kg/day.  No ad-
                               verse effects seen at any dose level in mice

                  Citation:    Cholakis et al., 1980
6201H
                   D-9
                                     06/22/89

-------
RECORD #13:
Species:
Sex:  .
Effect:
Route:
Mice
Both
NOAEL
Food
                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
Dose: 145.000
Duration Exposure: 90.0 Days
Duration Observation: 90.0 Days
                          22
                          0
                          HGTNS
                          BODY
                          4
                  Comment:     Doses of 40, 60, 80 mg/kg/day given for 2
                               weeks, then Increased to 320, 160, 80 mg/kg/
                               day (resp.) for 11  weeks—Transformed doses of
                               277, 145, 80.  NO adverse effects seen at
                               this flose

                  Citation:    Cholakls et al., 1980
RECORD #14:








Species: Mice
Sex: Both
Effect: FEL
Route: Food
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:
Dose: 277.000
Duration Exposure: 90
Duration Observation:

22
6
DEATH
BODY
10

.0 Days
90.0 Days






                  Comment:     Dose: 40 mg/kg/day for 2 wks, then 320 mg/kg/
                               day for 11 weeks: transformed to 277 mg/kg/day
                               In males, 401 mortality

                  Citation:    Cholakls et al., 1980
RECORD #15:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Both
NOAEL
Gavage
Dose: 10.000
Duration Exposure: 30.0 Days
Duration Observation: 31.0 Days

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          8
                          0
                          BEHAV
                          CNS
                          8
                  Comment:     Doses of 1, 3, 10 mg/kg/day.   Behavior and
                               other CNS changes were endpoints.  No adverse
                               effects seen at any dose level

                  Citation:    MacPhail et al., 1985
6201H
                   D-10
                                     06/22/89

-------
RECORD #16:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
N.S.
NOAEL
Water
                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  SHe of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
Dose: 5.000
Duration Exposure: 90.0 Days
Duration Observation: 90.0 Days
                          6
                          0
                          WGTNS
                          BODY
                          4
                  Comment:     Drinking water saturated with RDX, total dose
                               5-8 mg/kg/day .   No adverse effects seen

                  Citation:    Schneider et a]., 1978
RECORD #17:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
N.S.
NOAEL
Food
Dose: 15.000
Duration Exposure: 84.0 Days
Duration Observation: 89.0 Days

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          20
                          0
                          DEATH
                          BODY
                          10
                  Comment:     Doses of 15, 25, 50 mg/kg/day .
                               effects seen at this dose level

                  Citation:    von Oettingen et al., 1949
                                              No adverse
RECORD #18:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
N.S.
FEL
Food
Dose: 25.000
Duration Exposure: 84.0 Days
Duration Observation: 89.0 Days

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          20
                          8
                          DEATH
                          BODY
                          10
                  Comment:     Doses of 15, 25, 50 mg/kg/day.  Convulsions,
                               irritability, 40% mortality at this dose level

                  Citation:    von Oettingen et al., 1949
6201H
                   D-ll
                                     06/22/89

-------
RECORD #19:
RECORD #20:
Species:
Sex:
Effect"
Route:
Dogs
Female
AEL
Capsul
                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
Dose: 42.900
Duration Exposure: 42.0 Days
Duration Observation: 42.0 Days
                          7
                          7
                          HGTDC
                          BODY
                          4
                  Comment:     Dose of 50 mg/kg/day 6 days/week, for 6 weeks:
                               transformed dose of 42.9 mg/kg/day for 42 days
                               1/7 dogs at this dose level died

                  Citation:    von Oettingen et al., 1949
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Dogs
Both
NOAEL
Food
                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
Dose: 10.000
Duration Exposure: 90.0 Days
Duration Observation: 90.0 Days
                          6
                          0
                          ENZYM
                          N.S.
                          2
                  Comment:     Doses of 0.1, 1, and 10 mg/kg/day 6 animals/
                               dose group.  No adverse effects seen at any
                               dose level

                  Citation:    Hart, 1974
RECORD #21 :



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Monkeys
Both
NOAEL
Gavage
Dose: 1.000
Duration Exposure: 90.0 Days
Duration Observation: 90.0 Days

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          6
                          0
                          ENZYM
                          N.S.
                          2
                  Comment:     Doses of 0.1,  1, and 10 mg/kg/day by gavage
                               No adverse effects observed at dose levels of
                               0.1 and 1 mg/kg/day 6 animals/dose group

                  Citation:    Hart, 1974
6201H
                   D-12
                                     06/22/89

-------
RECORD #22:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Monkeys
Both
FEL
Gavage
                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
Dose: 10.000
Duration Exposure: 90.0 Days
Duration Observation: 90.0 Days
                          6
                          5
                          NEURB
                          CMS
                          8
                  Comment:
                  Citation:
             Doses of 0.1, 1,
             had convulsions
             this dose level

             Hart: 1974
                 and 10 mg/kg/day.  Animals
                and disturbances of CNS at
                6 animals/dose group
RECORD #23:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Female
FEL
Gavage
Dose: 20
Duration
Duration

.000
Exposure: 10.
Observation:


0 Days
20.0 Days

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          26
                          16
                          DEATH
                          BODY
                          10
                  Comment:     Doses of 2, 6, 20 mg/kg/day given on days 6-15
                               of gestation 31X mortality in dams.   Fetal
                               weight and length less than controls

                  Citation:    Angerhofer et al., 1986
6201H
                   D-13
                                     06/22/89

-------
RECORD #24:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Female
FEL
Gavage
                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
Dose: 40.000
Duration Exposure: 10.0 Days
Duration Observation: 20.0 Days
                          6
                          6
                          DEATH
                          BODY
                          10
                  Comment:     Doses of 10, 20, 40, 80, 120 mg/kg/day given
                               on days 6-15 of gestation.  All animals at
                               dose levels of 40, 80, and 120 mg/kg/day died

                  Citation:    Angerhofer et al., 1986
RECORD #25:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Fema 1 e
NOAEL
Gavage
Dose: 2.000
Duration Exposure: 14
Duration Observation:


.0 Days
20.0 Days

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          24
                          0
                          TOXDF
                          FETUS
                          8
                  Comment:     Doses of 0.2, 2, and 20 mg/kg/day given on
                               days 6-19 of gestation.  No adverse effects
                               seen at 0.2 and 2 mg/kg/day

                  Citation:    Cholakis et al., 1980
RECORD #26:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Female
FEL
Gavage
Dose: 20.000
Duration Exposure: 14.0 Days
Duration Observation: 20.0 Days

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          25
                          6
                          DEATH
                          BODY
                          10
                  Comment:     Doses of 0.2, 2, and 20 mg/kg/day given on
                               days 6-19 of gestation.  This dose produced
                               exbryo and maternal toxicity

                  Citation:    Cholakis et al., 1980
6201H
                   D-14
                                     06/22/89

-------
RECORD #27:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Both
NOAEL
Food
                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
Dose: 5.000
Duration Exposure: 26.0 Weeks
Duration Observation: 26.0 Weeks
                          52
                          0
                          REPRO
                          OTHER
                          8
                  Comment:     Doses of 5, 16, and 50 mg/kg/day given in a
                               two-generation study.   No adverse effects seen
                               at this dose level

                  Citation:    Cholakis et al .*', 1980
RECORD #28:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Both
LOAEL
Food
Dose: 16.000
Duration Exposure: 26.0 Weeks
Duration Observation: 26.0 Weeks

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          26
                          26
                          REPRO
                          OTHER
                          8
                  Comment:     Doses of 5, 16, 50 mg/kg/day in a two-genera-
                               tion study.  At 16 mg/kg/day, dams have
                               impaired lactation ability

                  Citation:    Cholakis et al., 1980
RECORD #29:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rabbits
Female
NOAEL
Gavage
Dose: 2.000
Duration Exposure: 23.0 Days
Duration Observation: 30.0 Days

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          0
                          0
                          TOXDF
                          FETUS
                          8
                  Comment:     Doses of 0.2, 2.0, and 20 mg/kg/day given on
                               days 7-29 of gestation.  No adverse effects
                               seen at 0.2 and 2 mg/kg/day

                  Citation:    Cholakis et al., 1980
6201H
                   D-15
                                     06/22/89

-------
RECORD #30:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rabbits
Female
LOAEL
Gavage
                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  SHe of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
Dose: 20.000
Duration Exposure: 23.0 Days
Duration Observation: 30.0 Days
                          10
                          10
                          WGTDC
                          BODY
                          4
                  Comment:     Doses of 0.2,  2,  and 20 mg/kg/day  given  on
                               days  7-29 of  gestation.   Materlan weight gain
                               reduced at this dose level.   No fetal  effects
                               observed

                  Citation:    Cholakls et al..  1980
RECORD #31:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Mice
Both
PEL
Gavage
Dose: 80.300
Duration Exposure: 1.0 Days
Duration Observation: 1.0 Days

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          NR
                          NR
                          DEATH
                          BODY
                          10
                  Comment:     1050 for B6C3F1  mice

                  Citation:    Cholakls et al., 1980
RECORD #32:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Both
PEL
Gavage
Dose: 118.000
Duration Exposure: 1.0 Days
Duration Observation: 1.0 Days

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  SHe of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          NR
                          NR
                          DEATH
                          BODY
                          10
                  Comment:     LQ$Q for F244 rats

                  Citation:    Cholakls et al.,  1980
6201H
                   D-16
                                     07/28/89

-------
RECORD #33:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
N.S.
PEL
Gavage
                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  SHe of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
Dose: 200.000
Duration Exposure: 1.0 Days
Duration Observation: 1.0 Days
                          95
                          NR
                          DEATH
                          BODY
                          10
                  Comment:     Dose range 25-400 mg/kg  1050  In  rats

                  Citation:     von OetUrrgen et  ali,  1949
RECORD #34:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Hale
PEL
Gavage
Dose: 71
Duration
Duration

.000
Exposure: 1.0
Observation: 1


Days
.0 Days

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          20
                          NR
                          DEATH
                          BODY
                          10
                  Comment:     1059 for  male Sprague-Dawley  rats

                  Citation:     Dllley et a!.,  1979
RECORD #35:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
H1ce
F ema 1 e
PEL
Gavage
Dose: 86
Duration
Duration

.000
Exposure: 1
Observation


.0 Days
: 1.0 Days

                  Number Exposed:
                  Number Responses:
                  Type of Effect:
                  Site of Effect:
                  Severity Effect:
                          NR
                          NR
                          DEATH
                          BODY
                          10
                  Comment:      (.050 for  female  Swiss  Webster mice

                  Citation:     Dllley et al., 1979
6201H
                   0-17
                                     07/28/89

-------
RECORD #36:       Species:     Other/NOS    Dose: 100.000
                  Sex:         Female       Duration Exposure: 1.0 Days
                  Effect:      FEL       '   Duration Observation: 1.0 Days
                  Route:       Gavage

                  Number Exposed:           10
                  Number Responses:         2
                  Type of Effect:           DEATH
                  Site of Effect:           BODY
                  Severity Effect:          10

                  Comment:     One dose given, 100 mg/kg 20X died, 40% had
                               convulsions

                  Citation:    Schneider et al., 1977
 6201H                                 D-18                           06/22/89

-------