United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Washington, DC 20460
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
(5101)
EPA 5QOF-99-291
November 1999
www. epa. gov/bro wnfields/
wEF'AThe Brownfields Economic
Redevelopment Initiative
Proposal Guidelines for
Brownfields Job Training and
Development Demonstration Pilots
U.S. EPA i-'-'raaquarters Library
-via:; •;.•::•..j;-= ?!VQ<
1200 f i'^sy'v^Ma A-.'onue NW
Wjjshincjtor; DC ::G460
:EPA
500
F-
99-291
-------
-------
EPA's Brownfields Job Training and
Development Demonstration Pilots
The bro .vnfields environmental job training and development pilots will each be ftmded up to
$200,OCO over two years. These funds are to be used to bring together community groups, job
training organizations, educators, investors, lenders, developers, and other affected parties to
address the issue of providing training for residents in communities impacted by brownfields The
goals of the pilots are to facilitate cleanup of brownfields sites contaminated with hazardous
substances and prepare the trainees for future employment in the environmental field. The pilot
projects must prepare trainees in activities that can be usefully applied to a cleanup employing an
alternative or innovative technology.
EPA expects to select approximately 10 Brownfields Environmental Job Training and
Development pilots by the end of May 2000. Pilot applicants must be located within or near one
of the biownfields assessment pilot communities (see Attachment A on page 12). Colleges,
universi' ies, nonprofit training centers exempt from taxation under 26 U.S.C. 501 (c)(3),
commurityjob training organizations, states, cities, towns, counties, U.S. Territories, and
Federall / recognized Indian Tribes are eligible to apply for the funds. EPA welcomes and
encourages applications from coalitions of such entities, but a single eligible entity must be
identified as the legal recipient. Entities with experience in providing environmental job training
and placement programs, including training in alternative or innovative cleanup technologies, are
invited tD apply. The deadline for the new proposals for the 1999 environmental job training
and development pilots is March 3, 2000.
EPA's Brownfields Demonstration Pilots
EPA delines brownfields as abandoned, idled, or under-used industrial and commercial facilities
where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental
contamhation. EPA's Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative is an organized
commitnent to help communities revitalize such properties both environmentally and
econorncally, mitigate potential health risks, and restore economic vitality to areas where
brownfields exist. Successful brownfields cleanup and redevelopment are proof that economic
development and the environment can, and indeed, must coexist.
As a part of the Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative, EPA has funded 307
Brownfi;Ids Assessment Demonstration Pilots. The pilots are designed to empower states,
commurities, tribes, and other economic redevelopment stakeholders to work together in a timely
manner o prevent, assess, safely cleanup, and sustainable reuse brownfields. EPA has awarded
coopera ive agreements to states, cities, towns, counties, and Tribes for demonstration pilots that
test bro^mfields assessment models, direct special efforts toward removing regulatory barriers
without sacrificing protectiveness, and facilitate coordinated public and private efforts at the
federal, state, tribal and local levels.
A critical part of EPA's efforts to encourage assessment and cleanup of brownfields is
participation by affected residents. In addition, EPA works to ensure that disadvantaged residents
do not bsar a disproportionate burden of the effects of environmental contamination.
-------
Reviialization of communities that are distressed due to uncertain liabilities related to
environmental contamination typically results in improved job opportunities. This should not
cause the displacement of local disadvantaged residents due to a lack of training needed to fill
those job opportunities. To help residents take advantage of new jobs created by the assessment
and cleanup of brownfields, EPA has initiated another demonstration pilot program—the
Brownfields Job Training and Development Demonstration Pilots.
Authority for Brownfields Job Training Pilots
Funding for the brownfields environmental job training and development demonstration pilots is
authorized under §31 l(b)(A) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980, as amended, (CERCLA or Superfund), 42 U.S.C. 9604(d)(l). This statute
authorizes and directs EPA to carry out a program of training and an evaluation of training needs
in the procedures for the handling and removal of hazardous substances for employees who
handle hazardous waste substances training in the management of facilities at which hazardous
substances are located and in the evaluation of the hazards to human health presented by such
facilities for State and local health and environmental agency personnel. The Agency is
authorized to award grants and cooperative agreements for this purpose by CERCLA 31 l(b)(3).
Training funded under this solicitation must be in the handling and removal of hazardous
substances related to the implementation of alternative or innovative treatment technologies as
defined in section 311 (b) (10) of CERCLA. The statute defines the term alternative or innovative
treatment technologies as: "technologies, including proprietary or patented methods, which
permanently alter the composition of hazardous waste through the toxicity, mobility, or volume
(or any combination thereof) of the hazardous waste or contaminated materials being treated.
The term also includes technologies that characterize or assess the extent of contamination, the
chemical and physical character of the contaminants, and the stresses imposed by the
contaminants on complex ecosystems at sites".
Limitations on Use of EPA Funds
Restrictions on the use of CERCLA funding apply to brownfields environmental job training and
development demonstration pilot cooperative agreement recipients. For example, pilot funds may
not be used for training for sites contaminated by petroleum products unless they are believed to
be co-mingled with a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant (e.g., used oil). CERCLA
expressly excludes petroleum from the definition of hazardous substances. Demonstration pilot
proposals should conform to the following guidelines:
The recipient may teach trainees skills that are relevant to the implementation of non-
alternative or innovative treatment technologies, provided these skills can be applied in
alternative or innovative treatment technologies as well.
Eligible applicants include colleges, universities, nonprofit training centers, community job
training organizations, states, cities, towns, counties, U.S. Territories, and Federally
recognized Indian Tribes. EPA welcomes and encourages applications from coalitions of
such entities, but a single eligible entity must be identified as the legal recipient. Nonprofit
-------
organizations must be exempt from tax under 26 U.S.C. 501 (c)(3) to be eligible for
funding.
Pilot funds may be used to train residents in communities impacted by brownfields in the
procedures for the handling and removal of hazardous substances, which includes training
for jobs in sampling, analysis, and site remediation. The proposed training program must
encompass activities that can be usefully applied to a cleanup employing an alternative or
innovative treatment technology. Funds may be used for: 1) training in the management of
facilities at which hazardous substances are located, 2) training for response activities
often associated with cleanups—for example, landscaping, demolition, and groundwater
extraction—where these activities are directly related to planned cleanups; and
3) development of curriculum for the training described in this paragraph.
Pilot funds may be used for outreach activities directed toward improving participation in
hazardous waste management training for communities impacted by brownfields.
Pilot funds may be used for training participants in the use of the techniques and methods
for cleanup of leaking underground storage tanks, asbestos or lead abatement; where this
training is a part or component of a more comprehensive hazardous waste management
training course.
Pilot applicants must be located within or near one of the 307 brownfields assessment pilot
communities (see Attachment A on page 12)
Use of pilot funds requires that training programs provide proof of non-replicability with
other established hazardous waste management training programs in their target
community.
Proposed training programs must establish procedures to ensure that participants:are
recruited from the neighborhoods where the brownfields sites are located and graduates
from their training programs are employed in cleaning up hazardous waste facilities.
Pilot funds should, whenever possible, be used to ensure those training participants
include, but are not limited to, the unemployed, welfare to work, environmental justice
communities, and other disadvantaged populations.
Pilot funds may not be used for conducting site assessments or actual cleanups. Pilot funds
may not be used for response activities often associated with cleanups—for example,
landscaping, demolition, and groundwater extraction. Assessment, cleanup, and associated
activity costs should be funded through other means, such as state voluntary cleanup
programs, state and federal government grants, state tax incentive programs, tribal funds,
contributions from responsible parties, and prospective purchaser agreements.
Pilot funds may not be used for general or life skills education activities, job readiness
training, GED costs, transportation costs or stipends for students, web site development,
or child care costs.
-------
As specified in Agency guidance, Pilot funds may not be used to support "lobbying"
efforts of the grantee (for example, lobbying members of Congress or state legislatures, or
lobbying for other federal grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts).
Pilot funds may not be used to match any other federal funds unless there is specific
statutory authority for the match. CERCLA does not provide this authority. However,
pilot funds may be used to match state or local funds if authorized by the relevant state
statute or local ordinance.
Evaluation of the Proposals
The National Brownfields Environmental Job Training and Development pilots are administered
on a competitive basis. To ensure a fair selection process, evaluation panels consisting of EPA
Regional and Headquarters staff and other federal agency representatives will evaluate the
proposals. The evaluation panels will assess how weil the proposals meet the evaluation criteria
outlined below.
Proposals must be clear and decisive and strictly follow and address each of the criteria. Sufficient
detail must be provided for the panels to compare the merits of each proposal and decide which
proposals best support the intent of the pilot program. Vague descriptions, unnecessary
redundancy, failure to address budgetary responsibility for all training, recruitment, and placement
costs, may reduce the chance of a favorable rating. Incomplete proposal packages will not be
accepted. Proposals providing the best evidence of a true need, a quality project, a proven track
record of job placement and student tracking, leveraging of partnerships with public and private
sources, a comprehensive budget analysis, and effective use of funds will have the best chance of
being recommended by the panels.
The panel's recommendations will be presented to EPA Senior Management for final selection.
When a proposal is selected, applicants will receive a confirmation letter, and the appropriate EPA
Regional Brownfields Coordinator and Regional Grants Specialist will be informed. The applicant
will then be asked to submit a formal cooperative agreement application package. This package
will include a formal work plan that describes the work to be performed, including a final budget,
and the required certification forms. The EPA Regional Brownfields Coordinators and Regional
Grants Specialists will work closely with the applicants to process and finalize the cooperative
agreement package. Proposal funding is not guaranteed at any stage of the proposal process
until the final awards are given.
Applicants with proposals that are not selected will be informed in writing. EPA's goal is to select
a broad array of brownfields environmental job training and development demonstration pilots
that will serve as training models for other communities across the nation. EPA seeks to identify
applications that demonstrate integration of the pilots with their community's existing brownfields
cleanup and redevelopment efforts; other federal, state, tribal, and local sustainable development
programs; community revitalization programs; and pollution prevention programs.
-------
Proposal Contents
Propos Us for brownfields environmental job training and development pilots should consist of the
followi tg sections:
1.0 Cover Page (1 page)
2.0 Project Overview (Up to 2 pages)
3.0 Responses to Evaluation Criteria (Up to 10 pages)
3.1 Budget
3.2 Problem Statement and Needs Assessment
3.3 Community Involvement and Partnerships
3.4 Institutional Capacity
3.5 Training Program Goals and Plans
3.6 Measures of Success
4.0 Attachments (As appropriate, please provide an index)
4.1 Letters of Support
4.2 Abbreviated Training Course Outline
4.3 Nonprofit 501(c)(3) Status (if applicable)
Attachr lents that will be considered during proposal evaluation are those requested above.
Examples of attachments that will not be considered during proposal evaluation include strategies
or plan;, developed for other programs, advertising brochures, newspaper articles, resolutions,
statutes, and videotapes. Information in these types of attachments should be distilled and
incorpc rated into the responses to criteria.
To ensure fair and equitable evaluation of the proposals, please do not exceed the above, single-
sided piige limitations. In addition, all materials included in the proposal (including attachments)
must b£ printed on letter-sized paper (8V£" by 11"). Font sizes may be no smaller than 11 points.
Please mbmit two copies of your proposal, including attachments, to EPA headquarters. In
addition, please submit one copy of your proposal, including attachments, to your EPA
Regional Brownfields Coordinator (see Attachment B on page 15).
1.0 COVER PAGE
This is intended to identify the brownfields environmental job training and development pilot
applicant and a point of contact for communication with EPA. This should be on a single page
and in t ic format of your choice.
1.1 Project title: this should be as descriptive as possible.
1.2 ^ocation: city, county, and state or reservation, tribally-owned lands, tribal fee lands, etc.
rf your assessment pilot partner.
1.3 \pplicant identification: the name of the main implementor of your proposed training pilot
jroject.
-------
1.4 Project director: the name, telephone number, Fax/E-mail and address of the person who
is responsible for the project proposal. This person will be contacted if other information is
needed.
1.5 Date submitted: the date when the proposal is postmarked or sent to EPA via registered
or tracked mail.
1.6 Project period: the project period must not exceed two years.
1.7 Cooperative partners: provide names and phone numbers of individuals and organizations
that have agreed to participate in the implementation of the project. Please note that
funding to cooperative partners will be subject to compliance with applicable EPA
assistance resolutions (40CFR Part 30 for nonprofits and universities, 40 CFR Part 31 for
states, local governments and tribes, and 40 CFR, Part 45 for training assistance).
2.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Project Overview is an important opportunity to summarize your plans for the proposed
pilot. Information you provide in the Project Overview may overlap with your responses to the
evaluation criteria. Provide an overview of the following topics:
2.1 Background
• Describe your experience in providing training, particularly training in the handling of
hazardous materials.
• Include a description of how this experience relates to training in alternative or innovative
cleanup technologies.
2.2 Goals and Objectives
• Discuss the goals of your overall brownfields environmental job training and development
efforts. This should represent broader goals than those to be attained by an EPA
brownfields pilot. This should provide a context for understanding your plans for use of
pilot funding. Goals should be specific, measurable, realistic, and within a specific time
frame, and relationship to innovative and alternative technology.
* Discuss the educational and employment objectives of the EPA-funded aspects of your
brownfields environmental job training and development demonstration pilot. Please
adhere to the limitations on the use of EPA funds (see page 2).
2.3 Project Strategy
• Provide an overview of your proposed curriculum plan, target participants, and
participation plan. Describe follow-up employment development plans, such as
recruitment, placement and employment tracking.
-------
Describe the role and resources to be provided by all of your public and private partners in
;he pilot. Provide documented evidence of the commitment of employers.
• Describe other training programs offered to your target community and demonstrate that
/our program does not duplicate other existing programs.
• Describe the involvement of advisory boards or councils and other commitments to
nvolve the community in decision making.
3.0 RESPONSES TO EVALUATION CRITERIA
Your response to each of the following criteria will be the primary basis on which EPA selects or
rejects your proposal for one of the pilots. The proposal evaluation panels will review the
propose Is carefully and assess each response based on how well it addresses each criterion.
3.1 Budget (5 points)
• :*rovide a detailed proposed budget for your training project. This should include cost
estimates for each of the proposed pilot activities to be conducting using EPA funds. The
Budget breakdown also should include specific resource commitments from public and
jrivate partners. Provide the names and budget estimates of committed partners who will
>e responsible for: 1) nontechnical training courses (for example, life skills training); and
2) stipend or transportation costs. Clearly distinguish between the use of EPA funds and
•esources to be provided by your partners. The following is a suggested format for your
>udget:
Budget
Categories
Persornel
Fringe Benefits
Travel
Equipnent
Supplies
Contractual
Other
Total
Project Tasks
Taskl
Task 2
Task3
*
Task 4
Total
-------
3.2 Problem Statement and Needs Assessment (5 points)
• Identify your brownfields assessment pilot partner (recipient of an EPA assessment pilot
grant located in your service delivery area, see page 12).
• Describe the community you propose to serve under this pilot. Provide demographic
descriptions of the population, poverty rate, unemployment rate, and minority constituents
within the service delivery area or community you are targeting in your proposed pilot.
• Demonstrate the need for environmental training in your targeted community. The need
for training can be indicated by environmental and economic conditions, brownfields
cleanup and redevelopment activities, environmental job training planning, and
commitments from future employers to hire local residents to fill environmental cleanup
jobs.
• Explain how environmental training will impact the environmental and economic situation
in the target community.
• Indicate whether your community is located in or near an Empowerment Zone/Enterprise
Community (EZ/EC), or is classified as a small community (population < 100,000).
3.3
•
Community Involvement and Partnerships (10 points)
Describe your efforts to involve community-based organizations in developing this
proposal. Provide a list of the community-based organizations involved and a contact
person, phone number, and brief description of the organization's activities and
representation. These organizations may include, but are not limited to, local citizen
groups, environmental organizations, civic organizations, local business groups and
institutions, educational institutions, and local labor organizations. Letters of support
should be included as attachments. These organizations may be contacted by EPA during
the evaluation process. -
Describe how the recipient of the EPA assessment pilot grant in your service delivery area
will be involved in your proposed project.
•
Describe how you plan to leverage funds and other resources to support the pilot. For
example, provide details on how you intend to fund life skills training, pre-employment
training, counseling, child care, academic enhancement, placement assistance,
transportation assistance, and other activities not funded by this grant. Letters of
commitment from your partners should be included as attachments.
Describe how the employers' community (for example, local businesses, environmental
contractors, brownfields site owners) has been involved in the development of the
proposed training. This involvement could include curriculum development, advisory
councils, apprenticeships, and mentoring.
Describe prerequisite skills or knowledge (math, science, or other related education)
required by participants in the training program. Describe partnerships with local
-------
c immunity groups, labor unions with apprenticeship programs, academic and other
it stitutions, historically black colleges and universities, and public schools located in or
n ?ar the target community that can provide the prerequisite skills or knowledge.
3.4 Institutional Capacity (5 points)
• E escribe your experience and the experience of your partners in providing environmental
a: id other job training services to the targeted or similar communities. Include a
description of experience and capacity to provide training in alternative or innovative
tieatment technologies. Describe the success of your organization in recruitment, job
training, and placement.
• Describe the certifications that your organization has been approved to provide to
g-aduates.
3.5 Training Program Objectives and Plans (5 points)
• Describe the objectives of your proposed project. Specify: 1) how many participants you
expect to train through this pilot; 2) when you expect to conduct training classes; 3) your
targeted placement rate at jobs that bear a direct correlation to the training received; 4)
and the target time frame for retention (for example, 90 days, 6 months, one year).
• Discuss your training plans. How classes will be structured and what topics will be
covered, including how innovative and alternative technologies will covered. Discuss how
your plan will address skills and knowledge required in the handling and removal of
h;.zardous substances. Provide an abbreviated course outline as an attachment.
• Describe ordinances requiring employment of local residents (first source hiring) and how
the ordinances will affect your training and placement plans.
• D ascribe how you will ensure that local brownfields residents have easy access to training
fa;ilities.
3.6 M easures of Success (10 points)
• D ascribe how you will measure the success of your project. Discuss your plans for
establishing and demonstrating achievement of milestones and endpoints.
• Describe how your organization proposes to ensure sustainable employment, including
pi ins to track progress upon initial job placement and continue environmental job training
w!ien this pilot ends.
• Di sscribe reports or other deliverables you plan to provide to EPA as documentation of
ycur project's progress and success.
9
-------
Schedule for Selecting Brownfields Job
Training and Development Pilots
November 1999
March 3, 2000
May 2000
Activity Schedule for Applications
Federal Register Notice published
Proposals due to EPA
Announcement of Pilots
Please submit two copies of your proposal, including attachments, to EPA headquarters. In
addition, please submit one copy of your proposal, including attachments, to your EPA Regional
Brownfields Coordinator (see Attachment B on page 15). Applications must be to EPA via
registered or tracked mail by the March 3, 2000, deadline to:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
OSWER Outreach and Special Projects Staff (5101), Room SE 385
Attn: Myra Blakely or Nancy H. Wilson
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
10
-------
Attachment A.
US EPA Brownfields Assessment Pilots by State
(As of 6/99)
Alabama
Birrrunghi m
Prichard
Union tow i
Alaska
Ketchikan Gateway Borough
Arizona
N'aco Fire District
Navajo N .rion
Phoenix
Tohono C 'odham Nation
Tucson
White Mo mtain Apache Tribe
Californii
Alameda C iounty
Anaheim
State of C: Jifomia Trade and
Commerce Agency
Carson
Colton
East Palo Alto
Emeryville
Hoopa Va ley Tribe
Long Beac i
Los Angel s
Lynwood
Montebell >
Oakland
Pomona
Richmond
Sacrament >
San Diego
San Franci >co
Santa Barb ira County
Stockton
Ventura
West Holh wood
Colorado
Aurora
Englewooc
Lakewood
North Star, leton
Sand Creel Corridor
Westminst< r
Connectie tit
Bridgeport
Danbury
Haddam
Hartford
Middletovn
Naugatuck Valley-
New Britain
New Haven
New Milford
Norwich & Griswold
Stamford
Winsted
Delaware
Wilmington
District of Columbia
Washington, DC
Florida
Clearwater
Escambia County
Fort Lauderdale
Fort Myers
Gainesville
Hillsborough County-
Jacksonville
Miami
Miami-Dade County
Ocak
Sarasota
St. Petersburg
Southeast Florida
Tallahassee
Tampa
Georgia
Atlanta
Augusta
East Point
Fort Valley
Macon
Idaho
Panhandle Health District
Illinois
Calumet City
Canton
Chicago
Cook CounW
East Moline
East St. Louis
State of Illinois
Lacon
Rockford
Waukegan
West Central Municipal
Conference
11
Indiana
Fort Wayne
Hammond, Lake County
State of Indiana
Indianapolis
Northwest Indiana Cities
South Bend
Iowa
Cedar Rapids
Clinton
Coral ville
Des Moines
Sioux City
Kansas
Kansas City, KS/MO
Wichita
Kentucky
Covington
Louisville
Louisiana
Gretna
New Orleans
Shreveport
Southeastern Louisiana Regional
Planning Commission
Maine
Lewiston
State of Maine
Portland
Maryland
Baltimore
Baltimore County
Hagerstown
Massachusetts
Boston
Brockton
Chelsea
Chicopee
CMEDA (Central Massachusetts
Economic Development
Authority)
Colrain
Great Barrington
Greenfield
Lawrence
Lowell
Lvnn
U.S. EPA H^-I
1200 Pe.,
-------
Maiden, Medford, Everett
Mansfield
Marlborough
State of Massachusetts
Department of Environmental
Protection
Methuen
Montachusett Regional Planning
Commission
New Bedford
Pioneer Valley
Salem
Somerville
Springfield
Taunton
Walpole
Westfield
Worcester
Michigan
Antrim County
Chippewa County/Kinross
Township
Detroit
Downriver Community
Conference
Flint
Jackson County
Kalarnazoo
Muskegon Heights
Saginaw
St. Joseph/Benton Harbor/
Benton Charter Township
Wayne County
Ypsilanri
Minnesota
Hennepin County
Minneapolis
State of Minnesota
Roseville
St. Paul Port Authority
Twin Cities Metropolitan Council
Virginia
Mississippi
Columbia
Jackson
Oktibbeha County
Missouri
Bonne Terre
Kansas City, KS/MO'
St Louis
Springfield
Wellston
Montana
Misscula
Nebraska
Omaha
Nevada
Ely Shoshone Tribe
Las Vegas
New Hampshire
Concord
Nashua
State of New Hampshire
State of New Hampshire—
Coastal Piscataqua River
Watershed
New Jersey
Atlantic City
Camden
Elizabeth
Hackensack Meadowlands District
Hudson County
Jersey City
Long Branch
Middlesex County
Morris County
Newark
Orange Township
Paterson
Perth Amboy
Phillipsburg
Trenton
New Mexico
Albuquerque
Bemalillo County
State of New Mexico
Environment Department
Pueblo of Acoma
Rio Grande Council of
Governments, TX & NM*
Santa Fe
New York
Albany
Buffalo
Elmira
Glen Cove
Johnstown
New York
Niagara County
Niagara Falls
Ogdensburg
Rochester
Rome
Schenectady
Seneca Nation
Ulster County
Urica
Watertown
Yonkers
North Carolina
Burlington
Charlotte
Fayetteville
High Point
Raleigh
Wilmington
Winston-Salem
North Dakota
Spirit Lake Nation
Turtle Mountain Band of
Chippewa
Ohio
Barberton
Cincinnati '
Cleveland
Columbus
Cuyahoga County
Dayton
Girard
Hamilton
Lima
Lockland
Southern Ohio Port Authority
Springfield
Toledo
Warren
Youngstown/ Campbell/
Struthers
Oklahoma
Association of South Central
Oklahoma Goverments
Comanche Nation
Oklahoma City
Tulsa
Oregon
Coos Bay
Oregon Economic Development
Dept.
Portland
Tri-County Metropolitan
Transportation District
Pennsylvania
Borough of Central City
Bucks County
Delaware County
Duquesne
Ford City
Johnstown
Luzeme/Lackawanna Counties
MiffHn County
Montgomery County
Neville Township
Northampton County
Philadelphia
Phoenixville
Pittsburgh
Reading
12
-------
Puerto Ri< o
Puerto Ric< i industrial
Developm< nt Company
Puerto Ric< > Ports Authority
Rhode Ishnd
State of Rh ade Island
State of Rh }de Island Economic
Developrm nt Corporation
South Car >Iina
Anderson
Charleston
Columbia
Cowpens
South Dakota
Sioux Falls
Tennessee
Chattanoo§ a
Knoxville
Memphis
Texas
Austin
Brownsville
Dallas
Fort Worth
Galveston
Grand Prai) ie
Houston
Laredo
Rio Grande Council of
Govemmer ts, TX & .MM*
San Anton* >
Tarrant Coi nty
Utah
Murray City
Ogden City
Provo
Salt Lake Ci y
West Jordar
Vermont
Burlington
Southern W ndsor Count)'
Regional Pla nning Commission
Virginia
Cape Charle s-Xorthampton
County
Newport N< ws
Richmond
Shenandoah
Washington
Aberdeen
BeUingham
Duwamish ( oalition
Everett
Port of Bellingham
Port of Seattle
Puyallup Tribe
Renton
Seattle/King County
Tacorna .
West Virginia
Wheeling
Wisconsin
Glendale
Kenosha
Milwaukee
Milwaukee County
Northwest Regional Planning
Commission
West AUis
State of Wisconsin Department of
Natural Resources
Wyoming
Evanston
Kemmerer
13
-------
Attachment B. EPA HQ/Regional Brownflelds Coordinators
If you have questions regarding your application, call
Mvra Blakelv at (202)260-4527 or Nancv Wilson at (202)260-1910
Regions and States
EPA Region 1
John Podgurski
EPA Region 2
Larry D' Andrea
EPA Region 3
Tom Stolle
EPA Region 4
Mickey Hartnett
EPA Region 5
Jane Neuman
EPA Region 6
Stan Hitt
EPA Region 7
Susan Klein
EPA Region 8
Kathy Atencio
EPA Region 9
Jim Hanson
EPA Region 10
Susan Morales
EPA Headquarters
Myra Blakely or
Nancy H. Wilson
CT, ME, MA, NH,
RI,VT
NJ, NY, PR, VI
DE, DC, MD, PA,
VA.WV
AL, FL, GA, KY,
MS, NC, SC, TN
IL,IN,MI,MN,OH,
WI
AR, LA, NM, OK,
TX
IA, KS, MO, NE
CO,MT,ND,SD,
UT,WY
AZ, CA, HI, NV, AS,
GU
AK, ID, OR, WA
Address and Phone Number
John F. Kennedy Federal Building
One Congress Street
Suite 11 00 (HIO)
Boston, MA 02203
Phone (6 17) 9 18- 1209 Fax (617) 918-1291
290 Broadway
18th Floor
New York, NY 10007
Phone (2 12) 637-43 14 Fax (212) 637-4360
1650 Arch Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone (215) 814-3129 Fax (215) 814-3254
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street
Atlanta, GA 30303
Phone (404) 562-866 1 Fax (404) 562-8628
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, IL 60604-3507
Phone (312) 353-0123 Fax (312) 886-0753
First Interstate Bank Tower at Fountain PL
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200
Dallas, TX 75202-2733
Phone (214) 665-6736 Fax (214) 665-6660
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101-2728
Phone (913) 551-7786 Fax (913) 551-7063
999 18th Street, Suite 500 (EPR)
Denver, CO 80202-2405
Phone (303) 312-6803 Fax (303) 312-6071
75 Hawthorne Street, H-l
San Francisco, C A 94105
Phone (415) 744-2237 Fax (415) 744-2180
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone (206) 553-7299 Fax (206) 553-0124
401 M Street, SW (5101)
Washington, D.C. 20460
Fax (202) 260-6606
14
------- |