United States Solid Waste and , EPA530-R-97-037d
Environmental Protection Emergency Response ' ' NT1S: PB97-177 465
Agency • , (5305WJ June 1992 '
4>EPA Background Document
* , * '
for Capacity Analysis
for Newly Listed
. t | ' ..," s . . '
Wastes and Hazardous
Debris to Support 40
CFR 268 Land Disposal
Restrictions (Final Rule)
i- . ' • ' ' .
Volume 4:
Appendix C - Background
• i .
Data for Incineration and
>. ' ..-..- •••'.,.:.-
Cement Kiln Capacity (Part 3)
401IW stress1
Printed on paper that contains at lest 20 percent postconsumer fiber
-------
-------
E
Background Document for. Capacity Analysis-for
Newly Listed Wastes and Hazardous Debris to ..
Support 40 CFR 268 Land Disposal Restrictions
. (Final Rule)
Yoiume 4: Appendix, A - Background Data for Incineration
•and Cement Kiln Capacity (continued)
United States Environmental Protection Agency
.' Office of Solid Waste-
- . 401 M Street, ^N.W.
-• -Washington, D.C. 20460 -
June 1992
• r^ z ft z
5 ° s.o
" 2 •"•* S" w *"»
• P 2-rt '«^ «
« sf - «• G
n-~ -
a g
O
a
to
CD
O
U)
tea'
M"*
ud
-------
-------
.:..' • ' .The following information included in EPA's commercial combustion capacity
". ;. update are included in'this document: . • ,: • - '.-. , •
.:"'. ' Volume 1: Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition surveys. •'.••...'
-,'.-'''.' ' ' ' 1 ' ' • ' ' •
-. ''•. Ash Grove Cement, Chanutc, Kansas ._'•_". . • • :
..j-.''.-• . .-.'..-'• .Ash Grove;Ceraent, Foreman, Arkansas
• Ash .Grove Cement, Louisville, Nebraska • '•.--, , .' •
-* '' ' . .Ash Grove Cement West, Clancy, Montana , ..
;j . . *.Ash .Grove Cement West,, Nephi,.Uiah - ' '..-."
• Blue Circle Cement, Atlanta, Georgia ; -\ .
^ - , -•Blue .Circle Cement, Tulsa, Oklahoma '-'"...
il .- • ESSROC Cemeht Group, Logansport, Indiana . . : , ..
1 •"-.'• ESSRQCCement Group, San Juan, Puerto Rico •'.--..'
~ . • ' • ESSROC Cement Group, Speed, Indiana . .'; '
'~ .'"• ,• Giant Cement, Harleyville, South Carolina . • - '
: .HeartlandCement, Independence, Kansas > : .
~* : . . •. ' i • Keystone Cement,' Bath, Pennsylvania , . . ' ' .-. • ' , .
•'. ' '• , • Lafarge,'Alpena, Michigan'. .• • • . • - '..
1 ' • Lafarge, Demopoh's, Alabama ;. , . . ' •.
~|- ' - '•' • Lafarge, Fredonia, Kansas.:,, . ' '•..''' . ;
•• - Volume 2: Cement KihVRecycling Coalition surveys ' - .. - '.- •• .- :
'.' . . .' • Lafarge, Paulding, Ohio • : ""..•'
_ - • Lone;Star Industries,"Greencastle, Indiana ...
'. -,' -', •Medusa Cement, CUhchfield, Georgia : . . -. .
, ' ' ;• ->• Medusa Cement, Wampum, Pennsylvania . . " ' •
„ . ,«National Cement, Lebec, California . '..'_'- j
- • River .Cement, Festus, Missouri . ,,. ».'
• Southdown, Brpoksville, Florida - ,
... ' '• Southdown, Fairborn;.Ohio , '. i .'
. • •''; . - • Southdown, Knoxville, Tennessee .. , . ,: .
. .•Southdown, Louisville, Kentucky: • • . . .' . ' '• •
•-.- •''.• Southdown,''Odessa; Texas . '• . ' . • ... .
• Southdown, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania • . '.-'' , • •
Volume 3: Incinerator capacity surveys • ' .> . . . "
, ^ . \.Aptus, Coffeyville, Kansas .' ; , . , '•'.''•
' • ; • Aptus, Tooele; Utah ; . ' .. .•••'. . .
• Chemical Waste Management, Chicago, Illinois /-. . -
'."'•;"" • Chemical Waste Management, Port Arthur, Texas . - •'
• Chemical Waste Management, Sauget, Illinois
•• '• RhOne^Po'ulehc; Baton Rouge, Louisiana > . ".•<•'
. .'• .' • Rhone-Poulenc, Houston, Texas .• • \'; .--..'
••-...iff:
-• !•£'•*&»•
: . « 0 2' ?. 0 ''
(•.** s _m
ft O. — w •.
. o
-------
-------
Volume 3: Incinerator .capacity surveys (continued)
• Rollins, Bridgeport, New Jersey ' •
,• « Rollins, Baton Rouge,-Louisiana .
• Rollins, Deer .Park, Texas
• Ross, Grafton, Ohio ' ' '; - x '.'-...
• ThermalKEM, Rock Hill, South Carolina'
Other.backgrouhd informatipn .' .
•8.s».i-S
IS;
S o ff
O
O
.0
en
up
Uj
-------
r
-------
Survey Responses Contained in. this Document ,
' Volumes 2;and 3: Appendix A cpmairi surveys completed by firms that are .
.'connected with fuels.(Substitution, own cement kilns,.and act as fuels blenders, regarding .
the capacity to burn hazardous wastes .under regulation since November 1984 ("newly .'. • •.
' listed" wastes.) The survey was sponsored by theCement Kfln:Recycling Coalition .
(CKRQj'.arid completed survey forms were returned to EPA to evaluate and incorporate.
into-the Agency's effort to determine the commercial combustion capacity available iri •
• May 1992. In addition to requesting.infonriation regarding liquid,'containerized solid, dry .
solid; pumpable and nonpumbable sludge hazardous'waste fuel-combustion capacity of, ~-,:
kilns they own or operate, the survey asked respondents about hazardous waste fuel
storage capacity and fuels processing capability, the fuels blenders from whom they :
.receive their-hazardous1 waste (if applicable), and the physical, and chemical specifications '
their fuels must-meet. . ' ..;.,.' .... • • : • '•'•'..''
' ' Volume 4: Appendix A contains voluntary capacity update responses from - . •
companies that own commercial hazardous waste incinerator facilities: in addition to
supplying information regarding theirpresent and future capacity to burn liquids, ;
pumpable sludges, non-pumpable sludges, containerized solids, and bulk solids, the • '•'_•'•
capacity update forni included engineering specifications of'incinerator unit(s) at facility, .
debris and soil acceptance criteria,' and waste code acceptability. This document also
containsjfacilities that are expected to come on-line, by July 1994. EPA contacted f
appropriate state regulatory .agencies, todetermine the status of those facilities. .-. '",_ .
.' telephone legs of conversations clarifying capacity information can be found at the end .
. of this document. -' :. •-' •. . ' . ' .''..-' . ". • '• • .
•-a.
* a s. 5" P
f III
o. a. M. w
• -0 •«-„
o , n
.•a
to
•.O'
o
. : Some facilities requested that all or part of,the information, they submitted be -
maintained as Confidential Business Information. 'Their responses are included in this
document, with the confidential information-deleted.'-Their complete responses can be
found in the 'CBI room at-EPA headquarters in Washington, D.C. v
." . • ' . --'. • • . • '• -' • •* * - • • -.- .
..." '"The data contained in these :capacity update responses was used in EPA's capacity
analysis as discussed in Chapter 2 of Background .Document for Capacity Anatysis for '•
NewfyListed Wastes'and "Contarninated Debris To Support 40 CFR 268 Land Disposal '
Restrictions'(Final Rule). '.'"'-.. ."•". - . •''. . .- -,-.•• -. • '•' . • .
-------
-------
1-
I.
»
..: o.
to
OJ
tri-
-------
-------
'&
' i «".
If
Facility information.
Respondent 'Name and: Title:
Company: • _____ '-, /I t/Tu •>
^m He' ' ' fcjuii «aj>"'
Phone Suraber:_
Fax Number:
:.; •'siGr'&yr:- i'oir-
Kane of Caller: ' • . .frc.fc.toV ' Ixr r*r\ TL^,
' Dace-.of Call: - .' Ji
Time of Call: ''. •"• '-' , '- ' T.
o. itS i"
Kiinber of units currently burning RCRA 'hazardous uaste ac. this- .
'facility: <£ '\- '-." "- '::-"_ ". " •'• ' ''• .
.Number o£ units expected Co shutdown \>y 'July 1994: . . • Q • •'•
. Additional units expected to come on-line by July 1994:''
• Total number of units expected to .bum RCRA hazardous .wastes at this .at
the facility -by July 1994: . ,j>.': . ••_• _ ; r'; : •' . . ' - -;' " :.
".-•'•-'' '•-•'' V. f -. ._ .
•' '. - ' • ----- '.''•'••.
Has this facility undergone any -physical or regulatory changes in the
past 2 years that have changed 'it's capacity? If so, 'briefly. explain.
Of
a o. „.«
.•,;::;•; ill--'-'
- 3 *• i
O
to
O '"-
•o. .-
en
on
-------
-------
Facility Information (ctd.)
What, is the current/overall utilization of this facility's incineration
'capacity-for folloving physical forns of waste? . ' •
Liquids - ____" : ,-
Pumpabie Sludges _^_
Nonpuitipable Sludges • •
Bulk.Solids . ' I:.
.Containerized Solids. ' . ' >
Total . ' •.-.•'.: 3!
•-.§•:?"'
••I.!a
o
o
to
• hrj
"o
o
'' I
Yi
•'»''
t(
|
i
MD
w-j.
-------
-------
-a
sr B
'il .
Permit Issues
Have you reef. .:ed.a final RCRA Pare B permit? If not, when do you
expect.co -.f-. ---ive a RCPA Part B pemic? : ..''''• • • '• •
Vhat-ochec permit(s) are riqulred-
-------
-------
. . • - -Permit Issues.(etd.) ' ." • .••'.' , v' . . .-• ''
What RCRA wastes.are currently permitted? If .oore convenient",. please'
fax list. Are all units' authorized for same RCRA.codes?; If not, please
'specify RCRA codes .accepted for each unit. ' . '•..' :
' • I**(•>/'- TK^./VC.f*. kr.crl jf •{e-*- ••• t'V' OT "
fer • Of <_rg"ff ^. "' '.'•''•'. .. • . . ' •
» o|»°
5' ** ••• » ^
,.O -.-..;
>o
•''.•.°-' '
UJ
4.
Are you adding any waste codes to your permit? Uhlch. ones?- 'When 'do you
,' expect approvals?- '." •'••:,. './•"''•".'. ' . • • '•
5.
What types of wastes do you generally reject?
'-^g-al'iA. fra'i' i^t u/»«?ccr^>rbt<- CooTJ
j -- -. r 7 .. _
-------
-------
c.
1. .
, : Constituent-Licit*tions/ Maximum Feed Rates
Do you accept bronihated wastes (e.g. ,. activated alumina containing''
•ethylene dibromide or phenolic poiyners containing.methyl bromide)?
. is your, maximum brorcine Unit (e.g.1. pounds per hour or raaximum . '
'•• concentration in feed)? . . ,
...
/ ny'
•: :•; . r •.• , . ,•'• : ' I
ogj \3\*fff il -~r f^ff^t^i-if-^ • c^ ^ nju.f* ^
' **\ V •
.;•,
- -,'
' , - ' - . '
.*••-.
.. ,rt . ' .
. - . • ' '•''- • " '
. '" . ' ' ' •
).' • Container types that' can be Received at the Facility '. . -
L- Do you accept liquids, puttpabl'e -sludges,, nonpumpable -sludges, and solids
-.'in the following forms? '..'._•.'. V' " .- .".. .'• • ''•' ' '' :-': ''
,•"•'. Container Type' _•.'.
..Lab Pack
' Drums. (What Sizes?) •
,.'; Cubic Yard Box
. Cubic Yard Bag ',
'...- . Roll-off. ''.' :
..-. • Dumptraller ..••''
Tanker . . .
Pressure tanker
.. • (Cusco) '"• ' - :
' '•/"'' Rallcar '• • .' : ''
•" '• -Barge'- •''
.• .-- 'Other (Specify)
' - ' -. ..'.'-..
. Liquid
•' • '
•'.•"• '.
'". ">'•
:•< • -\
~ '-' ' ' . ' -
'."..' -'
•'.' ''*< '^: '
•-K,. -,-
'•• •'--' - • '; -
Punpable
..' Sludge ,
'" '''•/'• •'
:.V/"^'
• • ; v
^rtr:/^^
•• '. • .-• '.-
Nbnpumpable
Sludge
.'•"• :•''•*- •:•-
•' :-^],:
;. .-/ ': •'
. \S " •
• -,.-' -.
.' '.-••- •'- . '• r
- ' -\ • -.
. - •.•'.••
Solid'. - ;
••'>'•• '
'.•'•'• V
•••'L/.-.'- '.
>/ .:•
•«x' ; " •
'• '* *' ' .'
& :.' ''
o.o.j. r.b--
*' ' " '••'•'.' • '••'.'.. ', • ..- • ''""• '" : ':. • - ' :.''•' ' .'
a. a ». M
V o « „
ft
-ESg
'<£?
Oh
-------
-------
9. . ' Do'you accept debris? Please indicate if you accept Che following types
.-. •• of debris, and any 1inications or.conditions of acceptance. •
• •« o 2 j q .
5 -s a ~.
•'.".-. " . . Hazardous Waste Contaminated Debris Acceptance •
Type of Debris
Common Cloth Materials (e.g.. rap, mop '
heads, blankets, or,cloihin|) • • . - •
PeRonal Proiection Equipment (e-g:. TVvex1
suits)' ''.•.'•.•-''..
Paper or Cardboard Materials . ' . ' .• •
Filter Cartridges: •'.' '•- -
Wood Materials
Rubber Objexu (e-g., tires, hoses) '
PVCPipe. •'.,-.' < •'.'•'....• ;_•''
Other Plastic Debris ••'•-. • .,
Class Debris '.' • . ,;.'' •• •
Ceramic Debris (e.g., semiconauctors)
Metal Objects (e.j., pipes, valves, pumps, nuts
acd bolls) ' .
Asbestos Materials (e.g., shingles, insulation)
Non-Soil Geologic Material (eg., rocks) .
Concrete Debris • ; • • .,.- :
Refractory Brick .'"• . :,.. '. ..'
'Other Bricks . .•..••''.- v -.'..-.
Slag i" ..-.-.. ~ ','• - . .
•Intact .Batteries '
Battery Cases • ... • ; . ' " /• .
Electronic Corappnenis,(e.g., printed circuit
boards) . . ' ' , ...
Electrical Wires, Switches, etc/ •
' Accept,
: Now
, (Y/N)
. .. - '.
•:••
. < • .
Plan to Accept.-
. By June 94
(Y/N)
-
' '.-
r • • ~:
1 " l
i . -.'
'"•'-..''; ' ' .'
. . - .
'. -•'.- .'-. "' '•
'. -'
. " Acceptance-
Condition; •
(e.j. particle JJ7C).
. -;-.."
•• :' : •'
' - -.. ' ' . ."' :- '
'• ' V'" '
V '
' ' ' • • . . : ;• .
• *'- ' " - - . •
-,.
•'-. .' _- •-••-
n
a
O
o
U)
-------
-------
••n
. V
i
1 • -•
F. "
=1',-
5.
Incinerator Unit Specific Capacity Sheet
Unit #:_[each question in Section F'will be addressed for each •••."
uhitl • ' ' ' • ' ' •
Unit Type:_
Thermal Raiing:(M BTU/ Hour)
Status: Currently Operating (Y/N) u/_ Planned for . . 19
If this iciln is currently not operating, please indicate current physical and/or regulatory
status (e.g.- preparing- permit, permit'submittedi performing trial burns, kiln, under
•construction).. .... ' , .' . .- •-"•''' '••••:'-".
Average operating hours jjer year accounting for scheduled and unscheduled "down time".
.- • Hours/ Year' - " • • .. . .'
^,£8M
. •« o 2 f i
*» . J?» '
ae-Za-'
'' 2 " —
o -v n
.n.:
•o--"1
K)
-O;-. '
UJ
"U
-------
-------
6. Please describe .the waste feed mechanisms used to feed RCRA hazardous wastes to ihis'
.•' unit: ..• '!. -;- '"'•••"-. •'' ." • : • ' '; ••• -.' . • "• ' '
-. . Liquids: '
Pumpable Sludges: " :' : . •". . •;. ./ ' . .' ••''• •
• ' ." -A' Atuit be'- cL A)e.«- •>St.' -V ( Vr C-
Nonpunapable Sludges: .,
-•< * «•
i» n
.'"I:
to
'• o-
. o-
^
Containeiized Solids: :
': ' g^cc Jl
-------
-------
.
11"
6. • -Bulk Solids:.
: v • '.' • •'' Df.?n^'<
i •..;•
7. Please indicate/the' RCRA hazardous waste volume burned in this unit, it's permitted.
- • capacity, and practical capacity in the table below. . " :• • . • ;' • • . i •. .
Type of Waste
• Liquids " <.
Pumpable Sludges
Nonpumpable
, . • -Sludges
Containerized
•./ . Solids
Bulk Solids .
Total
Amount burned ..-•
during first 6 ' •
months.of 1991 "'-
(Tons). .'••; /•-
•;'• O • -- \ .
o •
• ••• '.-'o.-1.-': -'- .- -
••• '•'.'• O • •; -;
"• . •'.. O :-' ''
-'•"- o -.'•-•:'•' '
Maximum . ''•
. Permitted Waste .
Capacity -,-
(Tons/ Year) or
(Pourids/Hour)- ,
35_oS^: •
; : ': . ,-r .-:.
""•;' '-Vvj.^
•• •/•- ... -,-:T-A=
• . •' '']••'': '-'.
Co>s5 •
• -Maximum . :
Practical Waste .
Feed Capacity
•(Tpns^Year) or -
(Pounds/Hour) . •'
.-•'•'•• "•---
j,"- •"''• ' 'N •"•'
'•?a. ,• Were the waste volumes received during the first 6 months of 1991 tj'pical of .what you
• expect to receive over the next year? '.If not, how dp you expect waste volumes to change
, after the next 6 months? 1 year? (i.e. provide.the percentage increase or decrease of each
'••;. . waste forrn that you anticipate.) . . . ' , . - ,.
•-'ct'.V-jrs ••- ' FL.Y' -the • f>/^-.^j."' ?<
. uC.gr •
t.V •.-v'f>-f ,1. K. fie . -?*,( ' Ij /, }{' i±j\.-&t\ Of\;fai
T~ - •• ~ -•-• •-. - • , • V • • • I
i-t t
-------
-------
12
8. Please indicate the amount of.RCRA hazardous waste contaminated debris and scjil
. . burned and your capacity to bunrdebris and soil by filling in the table below. >• .' .
Type of >Vaste
."• : '-' '• : .••• '
• . Debris
. 'Soils •'".',
; Amount burned •
., .during first 6
: months of 1991
(1991) • .
' .--O.--'.::-"-
•::..-O-V:;',:,-:
• • . Manrcium . •
Permitted. Waste
'•'':' -Capacity
*. (Tons/ Year) or •
. '{Pounds/ Hour)
/>.<*»«.;_•? or>oWj \->.
'Maximum
Practical Waste
. Feed Capacity
(tons/Tear) or .
(Pounds/Hour) ,
TaisA-.r • •. •' ' •
8a. , Are soil volumes and capacities of soil accounted for'in the Bulk Solid category of .
. -• -Table .#7? 'If not, what categories do they fall under? Please provide percentages'of»soil-
under those categories. •" ; ,. . . . ,'
8b. ^Arc debris volumes and capacities accounted for in the Bulk Solid category of ' :.
' • Table #7? If hot,, what ptegories do they fall under? Please provide percentages of debris
under those categories. • ;• . '-•' . '•/ . •-. •"-••"•.
-it
_>«*'
»lff
&
?!.
to
o.
•o-
UJ
en
ca
en
-------
-------
G.
Future Capacity of Commercial Incinerators
:T • '-
•.-"' ' *" ,'.
J ".>•••
What other physicalchanges (e.g., changes to feed systems, storage area) are planned for .
..this fa'cility that will change.it's capacity by.JuIy, 1994? Describe the change and the .-.•'/ .
•resulting change in capacity by .waste form, (i.e. the increase or decrease by waste form.)
•'" r
>.i'
•What other regulatory changes are planned for this facility that will change it's capacity.?
Describe the change and the resulting change-in capacity.by waste form..
S - S-Z
'
o
•O'
K)
^
: O •
;O
uo
C3
On
oh.
-------
-------
G. Other Factors to Determine Future Capacity of Commercial Incinerators (Ctd.)
3. Arc you prohibited from receiving any RCRA hazardous wastes from any states? If so,
•'' ' which stale's? .•,.".;";'.'.' - • ' . ' .. • .,'•'."•.'
. Arc you limited to receiving a maximum amount of RCRA hazardous waste' from any
states?. If so,'which states and what is maximum amount? c • "• . ,.:- : .
.; l?
n. - f «. t
a a «. M
t o vt ^
8 &2
""-
o
u
to
UJ
i/
X .
-------
-------
.-'/' 3JG-14-1S91 ' ;2:34- FRCK VnjS . •
P.W
.
S&-S
•;-o.
03
-------
-------
'TO .'.'
i*e39349rrie ' P-0s;
••" a s !T 9
•ex ex ~ "
• §.•?•»;.
;..'.', X
-------
-------
.-JoC-:4-i99i "13:34 Fscn:
P.06
r - 2.
"**
»•
if
i f,T
gla
Son
=.':i..-V:O-:
:.- U.
K>
Ch
t *'••
-------
-------
. j=PTLJS
F.B7
** H-
-
- Ill
- 1
o
- a1-
on
-------
-------
• s^.'z
*1 ss
• e " j-
,S?2-
0
. o
to
•..:Hrj
• o'
- o
-------
-------
so
.sni*
«s:c
a W **
•» ?«. (i 2
a " !• _ m
.o. &-•'«•
: ;O
. o
to
h-1
•'•o
.,•-• o
U)
'MJ
-------
I.
-------
snide ueaj 9£=c: . T6&i-p:-3nt
o ** >-
' ft -ft. »•
en
-------
-------
i
1
.-•i
. (i.
ft.
•JJP
•?• • M ':*
,Snidb
I
.ir
•«¥
" a. ~ •
e &
• § "
O
O:
ts)
•^
o-
•o
cn
ui
-------
-------
",-••!*£!!'.'
}
o
a
to
>U
O'
o
OJ
ch
-------
-------
"
M.O 2 jr'o
*• "* o 2 ">
is
•• • ;. UJ ,
CD
cn
-.1-
-------
-------
V
••»!•
•It :-1
• **'''• "ll
J* l
if 4
3
1
*
P
ill
so:*?,
.' Kin; t'S6t-«-orw
z
« o 2 y o
•3 3 «;:£•
B-.J U<» O-
o '!* S. „. tn
8
to
"O
••o
eh
CD
-------
-------
-•"•
*- •* 3 •
ffi ET
_ Z •»
» s - " I
.o. o.-~«-
rt o
5 S 5T
'•*
Sl'd.
O
O
cri
-------
-------
f •
If
I
J!
I
*
J
J
if
to
.
o ' • .•
U)
«
cn
-------
I V
-------
.
.2
Facility Information
iRespondent Sane and Title: RuJu' 0. ft"./, i - tVtOrfidir a< t.\O W/t
'»«"*.,. • ' • -' , x J .' .. -: ' • •/ ~ • ^ -
Company : _• '
Phone Number': '
. Fix Number:1'
:£_v7- - t'^ig
?> i^ '-
Same of Caller:_
Dace of Call:
: Time:of Call:- ;
Nunber
facility
of units currently burning RCRA hazardous waste at/this - , - .,- •
;y:—— '.-•'• "•''' '':•" ". •' ''.'":••- -•' ' •' '
Kumber of units expected to shutdown by July-1996: I ' .'- • ;_
Additional units.expected to come on line by.July 1994: Q ...
.Total-number of units expected to burn RCRA hazardous wastes at this at.
the_ facility by July *-1996: Q. •'. - "•'• ...' . -:'.,'-':
Has this'facility undergone'any physical or regulatory changes in the
'past 2 years that have changed it's capacity? -If so, briefly explain.'
"&-SB-O..
O. o. — ef '
•• s •* -
O ;:
O'.'
o .
UJ
en
-------
-------
r
'A. .'',.• ••.. ' .Facility Information (etd.-)1'-' >-..
4.. Uhae,is the.current overall utilization of 'this-facility's incineration
••capacity'for. following physical forma of waste? .» '-'— •
'•' - Liquids ' ' • / X • - .
•• Pumpable Sludges. X •'.- .
• • ' Nonpunpable Sludges X
•';Bulk Solids ... _^X ' ' • ...,".
,v Containerized Solids. .. -.X ' .. ' •
a-Q.--«•
' r*5
.«*?.
o
o
OJ
m
en
-------
-------
a.
i.
Fermic Issues • •
ive you received a .final RCRA Part B permit?.. If not,-when do .you
ipect .to receive a RCRA Part B permit? . • • '. '
Ha
'expect
-tV-.
O. ft--. »
1 8 " a-
SS-2 .
» §"
. i* r
'O
O
to
What other permit(s)'are requirelf t\f* vVftTvO' &r.'if to C.3
Ck.cr.o
~
oJ .,e J,
J '^T^^^ .• v
' .• v ^. . . -
'F'. f ^/».>He- t-.^M,.-! "aiara.-xt- Pfry/-i"T
. . .. .
CK'«CJvv3 L.^'J.-^r IJJ.ivh- t-ta.ritft.Vj, ••'pn^it.'t'A .Ff '<
.
'^ ^ -Ja C r r-i i-l \ij-.-\e. -t arc
L-if..
Ci/VQJ-..-T,^'f. p«/.~;-V A.t'i-c.-i-i -OS:
tf
cn
Uj
-------
-------
B.
3!
'_" .-•"• '' Penult .Issues (ctd.). • , . • • ., ." .
What RCRA wastes -are 'currently .permitted? If more convenient, please
fax list. . Are, all. units, authorized for sane RCRA codes'? 'if not. please
specify RCRA codes .accepted .for each unit.. ' • . ' ' . • ••'•''-..
fl1' CI", \v' WC-jVin-Vir*:\.' Q 'frt->i-.f j • Ouo'tW. ^c"t>».'i\3
AOA txi
•*!a -:
sMf--..
« 9
» s
"3 --
,,o;/;
to -,
o.
. O-
Are .you adding any yaste cede< to your permit?.. Uhich ones?.' When do you
expect approvals? . . •' '. - . , . • . .'•-..•,
What;types of wastes do you generally reject? •'
_M(?C. ri*a.i^lj»^|g^' fgA lO'ifl^i\eri lu.-^ i^CV, JjQO'i^r^' p/oh'
.-i«« %r A"
v~V' Are.rff
-J ' ^
-3 r^ O 1* «
«
ibrt
-------
-------
C.
'. Constituent Limitations/ Maximum Feed Races
Do you accept brominaced' wastes (e;g..'activated alumina containing
..ethylene dibroraide or phenolic polymers containing methyl bromide)?
is'your, maximum broaihe limit (e'.g., pounds, per hour or maximum • '
concentration :in feed)? •..."' . .'_."''" ' . • ' - . •
'2Jk^
O " —
go."
'
• Container types;that can be Received .at the Facility
Do you accept liquids, puapabl* sludges, nonpumpable sludges, :ar.d solids
•in the. fpllowing forms? . ; . . . ..' '• ..".•••;• . •- '•
• Container Type • .• ;'
"... ' 'Lab-' Pack '.;'••.
..Drums vjl
• - Ko : •
• . kfo . ••-
•^>
;..Vo •-,,:.
• ' ^'.•i
•• NO '*
'". •-*{"?•>
Pumpable.
. . Sludge' .
.-•', f^0 : '.
. yzopv. vi%
Mi'- •••;
IslO .
Wo . •'-.
. -. KJ.V
• MO.. : :
..••,•• . \
,. Mo
'. Mo
*•'*
' '•' < .
• v •> '• •' -
•.'Nonpuorpable
Sludge '
. fr/0 1
'•£ .f.\. Pdij
.. '.No
" ,' 'S-KJ ". . '
. . '• Mo. ' .
.-•f'J3..
N6 .
.'.••">J* • •••
•'.'• --No/". .-,
>Jo
Vc.V'-.
. -..• •
Solid' ' .
• r«
. AiV- ..
<.t«->
• : fvj "? . > •
• i'JO
.!•;•?• •;
to' .
• )j6
• Ws,--"-
- -NU- • •
-.'.(•'.- -.••
1 C-.» 'S
o
o
to
o
'O
U)
-------
-------
•r-
-f
Do you'accept debris? ?l«ase indicate if you accept .the'following'-;vpes ,
'of debris-i and any lioi cat ions or conditions of. acceptance.• •". • '.'..
'• . • ' ,' Hazardous Waste Contaminated Debris Acceptance . •;''.'. , • . :
Type of Debris .. . . ,
/ .
Common Cloth Materials (e.g., tags; mop .' ,
heads, blankets, or clothing)
Personal Prelection Equipment (e.g., Tyvex
s'uiu)' . • ' '•. • " .
Paper or Cardboard Materials '
Filter Cartridges •. ' . ' •
Wood Materials . .
Rubber Objects (e.g., tires, holes)
FVCPipe ' •. •
Otier Plastic 'Debris v ; . ~
Class Debris '. , ' ••
Ceramic Debris (e,g, semiconduabrs) . .
Meial Objects .'(e-g, pipes, valves, pumps, nuts
anil bolts)' .- ' .
Asbestos Materials (e.g!. shingles, insubtion) •
Non-Soil Geologic Material (e.g.. rocks) .' '
Concrete Debris ' '"•'.•'
Refractory Brick .• ' •''.'".
Other Bricks • ' . •
a«i '•:'-.• : '•• •'.'"•
Intact .Batteries ' •
Battery Cases • . .,'••-
Electronic Components (e.g.. primed circuit •
boards) . ••.''"•
Electrical Wires, Switches, etc
Accept
Now
(Y/N)
'.Y .
Y :
• V- '•"
•' V .
f-.
-Y, ••
• " t/ •
\ •
• Y
,Y.-
N
•y-.'.
M,
Y
M
Nl
M'
rO ."•'
•N'
>J-.
"V ••-.
•^f.
'.Plan to Accept
By June 94
. (Y/N)
"v-,. -
•' :';:-V;:-' : ;
' *f '
\
*
Y.
' Y •:
Y.: ..-•
y •: • .
•.Y.'- .- .- '
ro ,
:.x. -..•-. •:
N). -
Y:
N
• -.-M .
N
•.' f'J. '." ' •'
N ••.•:-
M"v '
;V.V. '
• \s-
\
. Acceptance • •
. Conditions
(e.g. particle size)
(U u^ -bt' lj.Ai-.fi:' if J
ku*VtO(!i».'.tr.»fc'
(KOolW C«iaiAcr>i.':tl
tw.n bc.'O^«L«cf i vtrf
Kt.i te t_j«t»-.-cr- H.-I
WwlW Cjx^n.«oit-d
rnuvt it Cj^ciV"*0
(Xujt \e, C».i4t.«.-.'V:cit-
[Hu.>1 ise.t-- •»'>•• .•••'.:'•'•
WM>« be v_./--i<-.-v : •
isfr.
to
O
<=>' -.
-------
-------
" . i "'id-'- 'Please explain any'debris acceptance conditions .noied on the Table #9. ". •
T ; . • '-MV d*i-.f.V rv.vf-ft r.yi V.^r -•» p'r.-.(c'. H'.'V-
,.j ./• . TT" —- : . i, ,.. ; 7
l-i
r^-t'r .--r r ••.
• VlMi.
, 'AS '. .'vi\
II; 5 . Do you' accept'soils? If so, under what. conditions or limitations?
v.ccJ-.fft- ^^o iby. e^-
O
s
o
•o-
^ . • '•-• -:,;t!
C3
CTi
—J
-------
-------
5.
F.
9 , • , ' '/';,.
Incinerator Unit Specific Capacity Sheet -
CL. O. M. M .
• O M w-
1. ' Unit #:_{each question in 'Section F will be addressed for each
'
• 3 - ii
v;5°2
2.' ... Unit Type:
ii-v
i\/s •"••>cc.")r>Aa's
i*S Agpf
ul' tvlct
V<
: A-
'
5. Average operating hours per year accounting for scheduled and unscheduled "down time".;
Hours/ Year . '.:. • • , .-.'•.."
o
S
.»TJ;
.'o
o
U)
ttl
CD
-------
-------
io.
6.. .Please.describe the waste feed m'echanishis'.used to feed RCRA"hazardous waste's to ihi>
. . »init ' .' . •' '•'-.".•
unit. .. -
Liquids: ' '. • '
; bv.At \& r.t ^r:U:
• T>Qrv.£cr •{<£*« .-\&*4-V Cji'l^ircr^ '4 a
si^^'
- ° !T o
o
o-
to
O-
U>
ctf
en
-------
-------
:.flS:
.;•' •• '• •• .'
'-• 11
6. -• Bulk Solids:
,. "••a|5-o
. jrtlso
n n *• in
? tt IT ™"
S & J
•"• .£g.B .
..7. • Please indicate the RCRA hazardous waste volume burned in this unit, it's permitted
•.• capacity, and practical capacity in the table below. ' '
'Type .of Waste
• • '• Liquids
Pumpable Sludges .
Nonpumpable
,' /.Sludges . :
Containerized •
:'• Solids .. ;.
BulkSolids
Total;
Amount burned " "•
during first 6. . ' '-.
months of 1991:
"(Tons),
t- .
Maximum
Permitted Waste
Capacity - -' .
: (Tons/ Year) or
"(Pounds/Hour)
• •'.'•' " .'.'"'
-;•. \ •'• • •' "
. - . . ' .-"
. ' • • .'.-••' , '
•^ ' i .
Maximum
Practical Waste- .
Feed Capacity ; '
(Tons/Year) or
(Pounds/Hour)
1 -• ' . ••'
•• '.'•'-
•':. •'' ' " -'•". . ;
•
.• •'"-.' j
-Were-the waste volumes received during the first.6 months of 1991 typical of what'you
: expect to receive over the next year?: If not, how do you expect waste volumes to change
after the next 6 months? 1 year? (i.e.1 provide the'percentage increase or decrease of each'
-waste form that you anticipate.) • ..''"' . • ••• . • •
O-
to
o
o
CT5
-------
-------
.1
,-n
12
S.; ' . Please indicate.-the amount of RCRA hazardous waste contaminated debris and soil' •''
. burned and.your capacity to bum debris and soil by filling in.the table below.
Type of Waste'.
: Debris -
• Soils' '•
'- Amount burned
during first 6
months of .1991 -'
. (1991).'
' • Maximum
Permitted Waste
Capacity
(Tons/ Year) or
(Pounds/ Hour)
.'-': "- • '. ' '
Maximum.
>( Practical Waste
Feed Capacity
-.(Tons/ Year) or
' (Pounds/Hour)
•" '''" '.• ' •:
8a. Are soil volumes and capacities of soil accounted for in the. Bulk Solid category of •
. Table,#7? If not, what categories do they fall under? Please provide percentages of soil
under those" categories. .''•••. . • •
under those categories.
UbX
8b. ' • Are debris volumes and capacities accounted for in the Bulk Solid category of ; . '.
• Table #7? If npt.'what categories 'do they fall under? Please provide, percentages of debris .'
Under those categories. .••''• - • • "• .
s ••
o
o
o
o
U)
on
uy
-------
-------
) .
' Future Capacity of Commercial .Incinerators. ; ''•.
What other physical changes (e.g., changes to. feed systems, storage area) are planned for
this facility that will change it's capacity by July, 1994? .'Describe the change and the . •:'- •
resulting change in capacity by waste form (i.e. the increase or decrease by waste form.)
'Ck
.•.-"••n
2.
What other regulatory changes are planned for this facility that will change it's capacity.?
Describe the change and the resulting change .in capacity by waste form. - ,'.:'.'..
K/e.
Ore. i>>
-------
\ .
-------
•14.
;>" -4
' Other Factors to Determine Future Capacity of Cpm'merciai Incinerators (Ctd.) .
- Are you prohibited from receiving any RCRA hazardous wastes frorri.anv states? If so.
"which states? ."• . . • • . • •• ' ,v '. . • '• , ." •
' ' " ' ' '
'4-.- Are you limited to receiving a maximum amount of RCI^A' hazardous waste'from any
',. ..states? If so, which states and what is maximum amount? ;•'.;• : ... ••
<-.«'•
<•!
*!*•'
05-0
*
:-3 g
•» " ~ _ in
--
•, o
«• _
O
•a.
K)
>n
o
o
-------
-------
»
3'
J:
a-'
.A. .
Facility Informatloh_
1.
Respondent. Kaote and Title :^
Company:._ ^___
' - tfig/-aA'c-rrC ir,
Ac
j
Phone Number:^
' Fax Number:
Kane of Caller:
Date of Call: '
.TIae of Call:
Port. AriV:.,f T'^^5
Nuaber of unlcs currently burning RCRA hazardous vaste at this .
facility: 1 • •".-••." •--. . "_ '''.''. ". '
• Number of unlcs expected to shutdown by July 1996;^ •>.'.
: :O
3.
Additional units expected to come on Una by July 1994
Total nunber of units expected to burn RCRA hazardous wastes at this, at
tha facility -by. July, 1994; t _____ 1 - . ' . . . ...
Has .this facility undergone 'any physical or' regulatory changes, in the .
.past 2 years that have changed it's capacity? If so,, briefly explain. .
ff. •i'/>'c.iftcVf.4aV' i?t -r.>H Ay-fV-.uf 'i
'jSu'e.gJL.'
f'ltr.t-.Ao,. -to
_ M. /J 4— «
38.5 •
Sg-.S
-'•• g"
loir
-O
'
O
O
Ui
fcs
CTi
I.AU
•-JC
-------
-------
A.
'" '.'..• 3 "• : •' "•
Facility Information (ctd.) . , •
What Is the current overall utilization of this facility's Incineration
•capacity for following physical forms of waste? f "
Liquids'. ..',.\ • ' ' » r' ' . .',''•' :.
PtLBpable Sludges ___T •.-.•'. •
Nonpunpable Sludges* - ' - I ,
Bulk Solids : ' . : • • » . ' .' '
•Containerized Solids. _j___X •-..'.'
•Total/ • •'••:•'. -: _•_* ..-••• . .'
• • '
o .0
"
o. a -i
' 8"i
" ^ n - 6 •-.
;-v. 55* g.
. o-
Uj
un
-------
-------
• *: . . *• ~.:-j-
.-*•'• I-''''.' . '
' ' '', •••• * .'<' *. .:
B.
1.:
•.'• Permit Issues-. .
Have you received, a final RCRA Pare fl permit? If not|-when do you
•expect'to receive a RCRA Pare. B pernitT . .. • .
•2; ~ What other perniic(s) are" required (e.g. NTDES. Air Emission)? By when?
• What la .the'current'status of these pernlt(s)? ' ' '.•"'-_ ' - •
If-X? .- _ . >. -I • ~~ '• -.. -s '- ' ~
'( <*-SfcT I ,suav. '-•
-_No
re.rc.wol
'-aL-MO
. .J" \V>'; .-•'.. j '-. '•..• •" ;. ' ''•'
" .^' '- '".^"f*- •-': ''•/• '•'''"
I • " "'•". ^^V- 'l" " >"
'. . '.. " • "^'•<"'-b' ! ' "' . '
' ', "> J ••" •' 1 ' ^ '. ' • :
'•'.\ ''. " ,;' ^
-------
-------
rz
B.
3. •"
.''•'• . .' •".,;• ." •' 5" •-. ;..''•.• ' • I ' ..." -•"-
' . ... ., ' "Penie Issues, (ctd.) ;. _ L ' •-,.-••
What RCRA wastes are currently penaitted? If more convenient, please
fax list. -.Are all units authorized for sane RCRA codes?' If not. please
specify RCRA codes accepted for each unit. . . '•.•'•'
Ge.g Q"Hc.cVeji lr.^~ . 01. 'ujori
Are .you adding any ,wuce codes to your permit? Which ones? When do you'
expect approvals? • - , .'i ,''.•'.•"'' • ' "• . ; • • • "
TVg; TjUau/i<
) .<• - hace. fceeri Qg|ct<.cj- -t'p
' ' ' • i_ '' • ' .-•
3C./fVM"T' yccr/<-tt^''. -~\(
i^^T^^^^^^"^^^"^^^^^^ J
Fo^T,
• OrtfJL
5. Vhat type* .of wastes do you generally reject? • ' . '- ' •. '.'
- . . • .. . J r •-. /^T 7
143 •• /vu ri'iclo^i
_^j _^^ '3 ; ,'
.
r ted-d •• • ft^lh-S
a-c
O ..
to
o- •'
:o- :•'
«
Cjn
ijj
^j
-------
-------
DOOl,
.(HV. 50212 - 001) . .
EPA HAZARDOUS WASTES CODES .
' '
:, 0002;
0013,
-' V
FOOI,
F012,
. K001,
K013,
X024,
K035,
X046,
X065,
K090,
K102,
X113,
K132,
P001,
P012,
P024,
P038,
P049,
P064,
P073,
P092,
P104,
PUS,
0001,
CO 12,
O024.
U033,
O047,
0039,.
0071,
0082;,
(7093,
0106,
0117,
oi28.
0139,
.0150,
0161,
0172,
0114,
DIM,
O2p9,
O221,.
023«,
0359
D003,
0014,
^
FC02,
F019,
K002,
K014,
K025,
K036,
K047,
KO«C,
-K09V,
K103>
K114 i
K136,
P002,
.P013,
P028,
P039,.
P030,
P063,
P07«,
P093,
P103,
Pilft,
0002,
U014,
O02S;
0036,
O04t,
ooeo.
0072,
OOM,
UQ94,
0107,
out.
O129,
0140,
0151,
-oica,
0173,
DIM,
0197,
O2 10,
0222,
0239,
0004,
D01S,
F003,
F024,
K003,
K013,
K026,
K037,
,K048,
K069,
K093,,
K104,
K113,
K137,
P003,
P014,
.P027,
P040,
P031, .
P0««,
P077,
P094,
P10C,
Pi«,;
O003,
0015,-
0026,
U037,
0049,
O061,
0073,
0084,
0093,
not,
0119,
0130,
O141,
O152,
O163,
O174,
oisc;
0200,
O211,
.0223 i
0340,
DOOS,
0016,
F004,
F025,
K004,
K016,
K027,
K038,
K049,
K071,1
K094,
K103,
K11S,
X13t,
P004 ,
PP123
0008,
0020,
0031,
0043 ,
0035,
O067/:
0078,;
0089,-
0101,
0113,
0124,
. O13S,
O146,
0137,
0168,
0180,
0191,
0203,
0217,,
0234,
0248,
* , '.• . '
1
F009,
• " f .
K009,'
K021,
K032,
X043,
X061,
X086,
X099,
xiio,
K125,
P009,
P021,
P034,
P046,
P060,
P072,
P087,
pioi.
P112,
U009,'
0021,
0032,
O044,
O056,
.0068,
0079,
0090,
0102,
0114,
O125,
O136,
0147,
0138,
0169,
0181,
0192,
0206,
O2 18,
O23S,
O249,
.
FO'lO
X010
K022
K033
K044
K0«2
K087
K100
Kill
K126
P010
P022
P036
P047
P0*2
P073
P088
P102
P113
-. .
U010
0022
0033
0043
0037
0069
0080
0091
0103
0113
0126
0137
O148
0139
..
,
f
,
> '•]
f .
f
,
f .
,
t '
,
t •
t
f ..
t
»
,
r
f
t
t
t
t -
t •
t
9
9'
9
t
9
0170,
0162
0193
O2 07
0219
O236
0328
1
9:
1
•,"
,'
1
DO 12',
FOll,
K011,
K023,
K034,
X045,
K064,
K088,
XiOl,
X112 ,
K131,
FOll,
P023,
P037,
P048,
P0«3,
P07'4(:
P089,
P103,
F1H,
,U011,
.U023,
U034,
0046,
0058,
U070,
0081,-
U092,
0103,
0116 ','•
0127,
O136,
0149,
0160,
0171,.
0183,
0194,
0208,
0220,
0217,
O353,
. ..
- g- •< « & z
'•'•'. ft-.•./'.
';-'tOV
-------
-------
.C.
1. ,
'.. . Constituent Limitations/ Maximum Feed Rates
Do you accept brooiaawd vas'tes (e.g., activated.'alumina containing . .,
ethylene dibroaide or phenolic polymers containing methyl bromide)? Uhac
is your oaxinua broaine liait (e.g.. pounds per. hour or maximum •
concentration in-feed)?. : • ';-• . "..' ...
i|uO'?:
ng r UC.GI"
D..
Container typet that caii be Received at the Facility
1. -Do you-accept liquids,. puapable sludges, nonpumpable sludges, and solids
. ' in the following fonn? !, . - - -,- ' '.}" ,'.. ' -.'. >
Container Type
IJLD Pack:
, Druas (Uhat Sizes?) '
Cubic Yard Box
.,: , Cubic Yard'flag . ,
. •" Roll-off /'•"•-..'•
. ' • ," Dunptrailer "
, . Tanker . • ,-•
Pressure Tanker,
. . . (Cusco)
' '' . • Ratlcar '•':'>• '-.
1 •, ' Barge " " ;' •
. . 'Other (Specify)-
•'. , •" _•'..;..
Liquid.
•Yi*-:-V
.No
. no"1 -.
•'•' Ma': .'.
••' • 'M o • -
• .MO
.1& .'
Vcr , -. -
. • wo
h/o". :.' '
. • M» • ••.
.' Punpable '
:Sludge • !
'.Vcv
'.'.-••
.-. H b . ; ' •
- r\o
1 ' NO'- - -
no'-
• NO
Ve-y. .
. . li-S •
wo • ' •• •
'•.'NO '••
' •'. tJQ
( ' ,
• Nonpuapable
. Sludge
' ' ' Yt^-: . .. .'
: ^ '. '•
• \*0 1? $7 o,al. '
•'•". :ho ' •
^ -.NO''
NO . .
.NO •'
N t)
' N. °' '.
:. H-O'
NO
f»0
Solid
-Vt-5 "
;;Vcj '
up.io 3'i".'-.^l
' -Vcy •.
Vo".-
. ver •
••• 'Yt^1 ..
.rJO ..
' - >J9. • •
; •.. «jo'.
••• vob ''.
• fwp
•"55
Jli
A !* 1
a-< z<^ a-
" £s» P
S T S"» H
o. ex — « •.
.'• s *•§"
rt» O
. 2 o ff .
•: ' - O
vo.
10
•
O
o
C3
I ''
Cth-i--1-..
• •'.»'
ijj
i^d /
-------
-------
•**'
Do you accept debris? Please Indicate .if. you accept the .followiftg'. types
of debris, and any limitations or conditions of acceptance.
'•' • Haiardous Waste Contaminated 'Debris Acceptance ''. •:;'<• (•
Type of Debris . . . • . •;
Common Cloth Materials (e.g., rags, mop
. head£ blankets, or clothing) • ' •'.
Personal Protection Equipment (e.£,.Tyvat
suits) . ' . :
Paper or Cardboard Material; ; •
FUter .Cartridges . • • . ' • •:
Wood Materials
Rubber Objects (e.g., tires, hoses) ' • .
PVCPipe
Other Plastic Debris . .,.-
Glass Debris. ' .' . ".•'•'-.
Ceramic Debris (e.g., semiconduqon) '
Metal Objects (e.g., pipes, valves, puraps, nuts
and bolts) '-.' " '•. .
Asbestos Materials (e.g., shingles, insulation)
Non-Soil Geologic Material (tg., rocks)
Concrete Debris ' • . '".
Refractory Brick . •
Other Bricks
Slag. .• . • ' - • '• •• -.-. ';•
Intact Batteries ..'. . --
Battery Cases
Electronic Components (e.g* printed circuiv '
boards) .
Electrical Wires. Switches, etc. ; . •
. Accept
Now
(Y/N)
. Y..
Y
v.:
V .'•
Y .,
N
.•Y
Y- ..
M
•;;r •'
. .Y
Y
/:Y -
Y
-Y
Y
'-' f: ' V
:Y
Y:-.:'
. Y:
. Plan (o Accept
: By June 94 .
, . (Y/N)
:V '
' ..' -Y •-.-•'. -'
Y -.-
• '- Y ••-•--•• •
Y;
• . v-/ .- ••
Y" /
V- Y - •'
Y ••--..,
• Y '-•:. -. •:
' ' Vv '••--
. ../•¥•.•:•,-.
.•••;. Y .-'.
,: .:V '
Y
" Y;. -••
Y ,
•- Y : .
Y
''•••••£; '
Y. ' • '•
~. Acceptance
... Conditions
(e.g. panicle size) .
. 1 /\ jrt Vc. rt WjJ'vfcl ii
B-urf It ^VirciJ^C
ivi)( bc'-%c."«;JJ.-N<-.
t-ujt t<: 'ii-.'Jl-t| tciV'x'-l-l'Ut
'in i^jKrioTi/n/i- .
k.jM'n.^fo s<- ->-.><*-.H'
jt.p-ia:'9' 3 .
Kp ;tj S' ^
•-p »J c>' '^ ' •
ypi., £••£ .
vp ...» j •>'.#
Cj-rAl.'-ef.- -U-:J t .,;.-«
•"u^ be '*->V- »(>•>•• •
-p.^i te i*--"-*! l-
^.V',b« •->-.., J-i-.t.'
" ::';V.*°.
•:' ' • • O
• .'•-. . O
-------
-------
10. "^Please explain any debris acceptance conditions noted.on the Table.#9. '••.
be.
lorn
xfo .
' • • ^-Q'fna^' ob^f^Ty •fniji->^' Vlg. sV>r^.dclqblc . 'or (.rti^koi big. __ ••
V '•••'' •• ' uCdd/d.C^ 'feci\ri . o^'
•. •
o. d ~ «
• O « «'
'•" S * S
*" f"
.O
..O-
to
-.hd
'O"
en
-------
-------
•-•••9.
F.
Incinerator Unit Specific Capacity Sheet
Unit,#:J[each' question in Section F will be adUressed for each
2. Unit Type: , i Rj\ar\> 1Ct\o. ", '•' "'
' • - "^ - ' •--
thermal Ratihg:(M BTU/ Hour)
Status: Currently Operating fY/Nl
Planned for „ ' 19
If this kitais currently not operating; please indicate current physical a nd/Ot regulatory
status (e.g. preparing permit, pennit submitted, performing trial bums, kiln under . . ,
construction). ". . '; ' . , ,•'-.•', '•' .=-'"•;'•. '
Average operating hours per year accounting for scheduled and.unscheduled "down tinie"
. CLR3T Hours/Year ' .- .. \,. / . . '
ft O, U. «•
' O K -.
n a. o
o
o
O -
o
OJ
en
-------
-------
.:/'.'.••••:.• " '. 10 ' :••'.'..- ,. .
Please describe the waste feed mechanisms used to feed RCRA hazardous wastes-to this
unit . •. ' •;'' ••'....- ' •'•,-•• ' • '.•/'
<-'i •fling1 / nS<.(4'tK. •dx'S
. J -I ,
I • • f » . " • ., •
»~1 pt^/ftpS \VJQ-! TC^fc.*; J^ TT'rf<»fa> " '
Pumpable Sludges:
* •lr\vp^iQV\ pi pi^l
, J j ; Y
pur».oj
1 cotes.
f
.
• g "
.3- "'a
•
-O'
s
Noppuaipable Sludges: -
va^n
hi.iV; 'g.
iai g
Containerized Solids:
.a fen- •ftielec': ,•
*-**!•
en
-------
-------
6. Bulk Solids:
. 'fTf'r/viaru
I .; V .1
sVir'cttditf . .
;:i) :. . , 7.
c. by-
Please indicate the RCRA. hazardous waste volume burned in this unit, it's permitted
capacity/ and practical capacity in the table below. C6I / :. .
Type of Waste :
•'••'. • Liquids .
Pumpable Sludges
' Nonpumpabte j
Sludges .
. Containerized
: Solids
Bulk Solids i
Total
Amount burned '
during ISrst 6 • - -: . •
months of '1991
(tons) -"•._."
'' - ' •'
\ . : . , ' -
' . i .•."••
• • • ' • . • ;
. 'Maximum .•
Permitted Waste ',
Capacity '•; ...
;(Tons/ Year) or
(Pounds/Hour) - :
';' ••-•;'•'••".. - • ; "-".".'.
•'.•'• ' -• •
." '. s ''.. >
'••".. . • . ..-
' "'' '\ . '- ':' ^ -..'•
..•Maximum.
Practical Waste
Feed Capacity
(Tons/Year) or =
-(Pounds/Hour) •
•••'•' ••"-,, •-•••--
'. • '' :-:
.'-. ' • ''.: ""' •'.. •"
•'. •'•• .'.",'; • '
':}•'. ' '.' ' ' •
7a. ' Were ihe waste volumes received during the.first 6 months of 1991 typicatof what you -
• expect-to receive'over the next year? If not, how do you expect waste volumes to change •
. after the next 6 months? 1 year? (i.e. provide the percentage increase or decrease of each
•;.•• waste form that you anticipate.) : '-• "• •' ' •,. •',.. •• • ' ' '. • •
8*2
-•Isft
o
•o.
to
c5
cri
-------
-------
•v'-v-
' t'
I
12-
,8.
Please indicate.the amount of RCRA. hazardous'waste, contaminated debris and soil
1 burned and your capacity.to burn debris and soil by filling in the table
Type of Waste
' - ' f
Debris. ' '
: '• ', ' 'Soils: .' ;.- '
'. Amount burned ;•
during first 6
months of 1991
. (1991).
• :Maximum '
Pemritted Waste
. '••. '- Capacity. . '•
.(Tons/ Year) or
.(Pounds/ Hour) .' .
•' . - --, . . .-
;. Maximum
, Practical Waste >
. Feed Capacity
(tons/ Year) or !
(Pounds/Hour) -'
. I , '•
8a. Are soil volumes and capacities of soil accounted for in the Bulk Solid category of ~. ''-
! Table #7? If not, what categories.do they fall under? Please provide percentages of soil . . .
; • under those,categories.." ' .' _ • ''..-,- ,v v"' • .-' \ -....' ••' , -
Iff:
c
o S -jro
"?r2 K
~ a n • «
-?-.«• 2 '
<* — „. m
'
o
O
O
OJ
8b. Arc debris volumes and capacities accounted for in the Bulk Solid category of .
. table #7? If riot, what categories do they fall under? Please provide percentages of debris •
•under those categories. '.-.'• • ' • . -! ';•'•-•• '.• ; •"•••. • . •'
C3
cn
iJC'
Lfl
y:~-&
-------
-------
13
a;
.••*
,:.«.
'i.«
G.
1. .
,' Future Capacity of Commercial Incinerators
What other physical changes (e.g., changes to feed systems, storage area) are planned for
this facility that wiU change it's capacity by,July, 1994? Describe the change and the
resulting change in capacity by waste form (i.e. the increase or decrease by waste form.)"
co"hyH*ucAcol. txte. 'ryicxM onsifuc-i' ."the.od dUjK j na V
q >C~'
n&. ^jtM
to rnCcr -PeeJi'
'What other regulatory changes-are planned for this facility that will change it's capacity.?',
Describe the change and the resulting change in capacity by waste form. ..,'..
artVPocV ,jTU
a M 5
"-« 0
•» _ in
l*a-.
to
,w
o
.o.
U)
'CS
q^
-C
.On
-------
-------
14
G. ; Other Factors to Determine Future Capacity of Commercial Incinerators (Ctd.)
3.,. "Are you proWbitcd from-receiving any RCRA hazardous wastes from any states? .if so,
-.'. .,' which states? ' • - : ' .'. ' !" "•' • •' ,• : ' '
4. Are you iWted to receiving a maximum amount of RCRA hazardous waste frotn any
states? If so, which states and what is maximum amount? ' ..
'•-.' • ••'.' 1-.No...•-..:•••,.--./ •• :';:-.-•.;-' "„••" ';•''"• '••;- '''>./';'-
•* o 2 r o
"
to
o .
U)
en
-------
-------
- \^M.^«c.T.,'.'I..1'•. •»>•:
A.' .
, " '• ' 2 . ' • "
. Facility Information.
1, Respondent Name and Title:
Company: C.V'erp.'L'Ol
Phone Huaber: . fcdSN tX I a" - J(
\c/»ay.'j*cnT
". • ' ' Fax Number:
&1S'- 15
•v:>:,"-i|lf|-.."
. & & M. *r
Name of Caller:.
' ..Date of Call: 'm
-. , Tlme.of Call:
Number of units currently-burning RCRA hazardous waste'at this' •
facility: "M- . • ;-, . - '•'•.•:'• '.'.;"'': '''.',''..-' '-" ' •',•
Number of units expected Co tKutdown by .July 1*994: . . . 0; .' •
Additional units expected to cone on llne.'by July -1994: '•' . Q .. ,:'' .
.Total, nuaber of units expected 'to burn RCRA hazardous wastes at this at
the facility, by July 1994 ; M- ' '/ . ' •
Has this •facility undergone any physical or .'regulatory changes in the ,
past '2 years that have changed' it's capacity?'. If so, briefly explain.
' v' ' ' ' ' •''• '"•'
*^x • Ol T-jtotl
o.
o-
-o
CD
crs
-c:
-------
-------
'__-•• . • Facility information (ctd.)
'.What .is .the .current overall utilization of this facility's' incineration
, : capacity.for following physical"forms of waste? -*'"—•
, ' Liquids '.'\. ._
: Punpable Sludges '. _
Nonpuopable Sludges . _
Bulk Solids _
Containerized Solids
3t'
1 '
X'1.
.»
X
R.
" a = « 9
•3 ^ o 5 ">
'•••I ""a
»
11 ='
•: :.to'- .-.
••'•.o: .
' '-o '
U) .
.C3T1-
-------
-------
HJCWK--5! .
5 -r P»
ssr
i'
Permit Issues
1.- .-Have you received a final RCRA Part.B permit? If.not. .when db'you
i -expect to receive a RCSA Pare B permit? " / , " , ••
2. Uhat other perolc(s) are required (e.g. NPDES, Air Emission)? -By "hen?
•" • What is the', current status of these penile (s)?. • .
' ivc^/'na^ciojs 4rVcf<
.
a a M. M
• g »
g &3
*•*•*•.
- » § w
. z - a
'• ~ °
•O"'
a
to
w
O '.
'O./
cn
-------
-------
5'
1 . • • Penttlt Issues (ctd.)- .''•-, . :(
What RCRA wastes are currently' permitted? If more convenient, please'
fox' list. Are all units authorized for same HCRA codes? If not, please.
specify. RCRA codes accepted -for each unit. ''.''•' . '
'All eyccci ur.aC£C-.y^blc. t^oAff, U-^
o
• O
o.
UJ-
4. . Ara you adding any'vast*'cod*•'to'your permit? Which'ones? Uhep do you
expect approvals? • ' .- • . ,- .' " ' '' '•••'',.' .'..
' . ' ' :..L. Klrrl trV -V-W1 'Cv.frfftV -t'\
-------
-------
-oCT-e3-'91 THU 09:36 ' IDiTRflDE LftSTE . . FflX NJ:616-271-2804 X 113 .-0229'P01 '
gotHf bund fax Iransnmtial mono TOT |«o«>»a«i»
r
T R APE WAS T E I K C I N E H A T T
., .UNACCEPTAalE MATERIALS
asv
PART B fSECTOH VIIH
F022
F023
F026-
•F.02T-
,f028 •
• Asbestos: . •
PCBl (>SO ppm)
.P009 - Ammonium PI crate, (jjaa.)
P03t - Cyanogen (gae) . •.-. . .
P033 '-;.Cyanogen Chloride ,(gas) • . •
P056 - Fluorine (sa«)'••'..''
POS3 - Hydrogen Cyanide (gas) - . . .
P09S - Phosgene (gas) . ' ~
• P096 -".PhOsqhine (aas) " - .
U07S •* Oichlorodifluoroniethane (>0.1*)
U121*,- Trlcmbromohof luoromethane (>0.ix)
U13* - Hydrogen .Fluoride (oa»)
U225 - Tr1brbrnqmethane (>0.ix)
Radioaetlves,, (other .than deregulated C14 and H*)
•MO?' ', • •' . ;'. • .' • -. -' :.
Kids •*••.•.,;-• - ' -.. •..'•••• : •• . • . '
THIRD THIRD^gPECIFIEP TECHHOLqffyCQOES
0008 (Cadmium Batteries)
0006 (Lead Acid Batteries) :.
K061 (High Zn subeategory) .*'••'
KOB9'- '..-•' - ' . ' . '••-.' . -'..-,. ./.
P076 - Mitric Oxide
^- Nitrogen, Dioxide ,
•: CODES RESTRICTED DUE TO LOW TREATMENT STOS OR SITE - POLICY
0017 ,
P010
F024
K022
K026
X0*3
KOBO
K099:'
KT04 -'•
U151
KOM
KOI 3
K014
KOBS
K087
ACCEPTABLE AS APPENDIX IV. OR V^LABPACK ONLY
•pots
REV; 4/25/91
K)
• ••o-
u>
-------
-------
r
,.:'. '• - Constituent- Limitations/ -Haxinum Feed Rates , '• •' „
Do- you accept broolnated Wastes "
- ' ' ' •* . .'--••
'. .Pressure; Tanker
'•••' • (Cusco) ,
' ' . .I'RaUcat
• •• . ., Barge :, ' . ',
. Other /(Specify)
»A«"V*d Tc-nfctr.
:'-•-- i . ., . .• .
. Liquid
' lt-5.
•55 to *SyW
- (. -
. Wo '
M,o
Mo -
»»
Yes
.K>o"
No •-..
:MO
'
. Ve.i-
Pumpable
Sludge •
Yt-t •
J5'4i«£l.
No -•• .
No ,
Ho .
Ms
Y«
.Wo •
;No
N'o •• .
- •> ,
• . >JO
. Nonpufflpable
". Sludge " ' ..
VtJt .
55*»''SSefi.-
.too
Wo ' .
No " '
. rJo
. -NO. . :
.No." .
Nh)
. Mo v "
. : . NO '
Solid '. /
• • 'i • '.
: Yes"
5S
-------
-------
- -58
•
• 9.
Do you accept debris? Please Indicate if you accept the following-types
; ' of debris,.and any limitations or conditions'of acceptance. .'.'••
.: . ' Hazardous Waste Contaminated' Debris Acceptance •••'-•• • . •'. .
TVpe'of Debris , Y . :
Common' Qoth Materials (e.g.. rags, mop
heads, blankets, or clothing) ' ,' ••' '
Personal Protection Equipment (e,g, Tyvcx
suits) • •'••... ' _. •• . •" • '.
Paper or Cardboard Materials •
Filter Cartridges .
Wood Materials: J .
/Rubber Objects (&£, tires, noses)- .
pvcpip* ; ; ..-'-:•' .. '
Other Plastic Debris . '' ~ .'.
Class E>ebris .,' . . . ' .
Ceramic Debris (e,g_ semicondttctors) . ...
Metal Objects (e.g, pipes, valves, pumps, nuts
and bolts) ' - , •
Asbestos Materials (e.g,,shinj)<3. insulation) ;>-
Non-Soil Geologic Material (e.g.; rocks) .
Concrete Debris ' ' .: '
Refractory Brick ' • . , ""
Other Bricks ', . •- ' .'••..
Slag. :-. . . -.'•'.•'
Intact Batteries •..•'• '.,'..'.-•
Battery Cases-. . . : •
Electronic Components (e.g., printed. circuit •
boards) .'• •' •'..'.-. •;• ,,: .
Elearical Wires, Switches, etc ' .•
.Accept-
Now
(Y/N)
^
^
YcT
:vc.5
Ycr
Air '
.Vw •:
^y«-
Ves-'.-.
Vfe5 .
Ye.5
TN/O
Ytv
v«
.•Wf
Y^r
Yw.
Ve.T - '•
Y«
Yc5
YW .
Plan to Accept .
~ By June 94
(Y/N) ;•
• 'V«v.
.'.",'Ye.r- :. ...
•Ye 7
Y<-T . .
Y«. .
1 Y^ - r
Y^T
YtY
VM-----.-.-
r^r
V.-Y^-:';.::
: ' 'NO"'.---
- .y« /
Vtv- ^
Yw .
•V^r' -.= '•
-. Y** :
Ye:r .
. --.Year-
.'Ye,' -
"Yey .
Acceponce •
. Conditions
(e.g. particle size)
..'-.• Cm HiTin-p.'j ' .
.-.ilT. liTVo-it
1 . ' 2Cjr\ >Xr«^> •
Ir>'. Af^aa
' I>^ nlrun'J, ;
' - TK/ 4r<»m>
JEo • -dfuno'
Jut^. Hrurti
, • Xr> . .'ir-a fl^-
.Ir»'HrUo"7.
i)^ '\ruwi -
• .' ;•' ; .",
ivife^k^t':-.^
£/> WK.' <:tr'-',.*r."
^b-.^^H-.:.:^.
i*\ bwl)L •^'t 5» t'c "
t* bv,!^ i-1*";:, » •: '
inAV*,™ f.Stt."
:.-lT^ dro-.-.-.
•JTrt'-J «•<»«"'• :
Cn -di r ;i r« .
• •• - i
v' •'-• •
p.,0. ...»
S e. §f •
c *? - -
to
x.*t?".
o
o
U)
-------
-------
10.' Please explain any debris acceptance conditions noted on the.Table #9.' , •• •. • . •
• Of.brn o nrW-afil
MV Ar{.- Auc '-to . -. r . ..- ~ ~ • _
-or
— mu-ste r»a\ ic-rV-iVc cuV>gir> sulAccirct -tn gi-'flaJU '• no'vAJ
'•' ' "' ' '' ' ' '' -''"
\. -o
Qn':j
uril
-------
I..
-------
r-r /
F.
incinerator Unit Specific Capacity Sheet
1-. : Unit •#: {each question in Section F will be addressed-for each
- .-.1. •--•••..'•••• .. " ' :.•;•.
2. ' Unit Type:"'• £ivrji V>ccvrtV '•' i •• . • '.•
.Thermal Rating:(M BTUAHpitr)
Status; Currently Operating (Y/N) -feS" Planned for 19 ... .
If this kiln is currently not operating, please indicate current physical and/or regulator)'
status (e.g. preparing permit, permit submitted, performing trial bums,'kiln under, ..
.construction); -... • •".'•. * . .-'• • , / .
5.
Average operating hours per year accounting for scheduled and unscheduled "down time".
" Hours/Year • . ' , ' "•
us
5*8
I si.
'•n -
o •
to-.
• • o.
.' o--
; UJ
cn
en
-------
-------
Incinerator:Unit Specific Capacity Sheet
1. Unit #:Jeach question inlSection F wjll be addressed for each
• ' •• -unitl.. -.^ ' •.'-'.. •. ' .•• • :; -• '• • '••' •••' .. '•
Z . Unit TTOC: Pi
Thermal Rating:(M BTU/ Hour)
Status: Currently Operating (WO Ygj Planned for . -'• 19 . . .; r
.If this kiln is currently not operating, please indicate current physical and/or regulatory
status (e.g. preparing permit, permit submitted, performing trial bums, kiln tinder
'construction). •..-; '. . - :' '• :, .';: •••." '.•' %;" . • .•'''; • " '-..',-
to
•**'
•-o-
o
5. Average operating hours per year accounting for scheduled and unscheduled "down time",
CKT Hours/Year' '•....."" , '• . -
cn
-------
-------
• f.
'.*. •
*.'•'
a"
F.
.1.'.
-2.
Incinerator ;Uriit Specific Capacity Sheet
Unit #: [each question in Section F will be addressed, for each
unit! • 4-. . . . •;••.'
,Unit Type:
.Thermal Rating:(M BTU/ Hour) 'aO . ' .
Status; Currently Operating (Y/N) fo Planned for ;' •.' .19' "•'•';'.
If this kiln is currently not operating, please indicate-current physical and/or regulatory
'status.; (e.g. preparing permit, permit submitted, performing trial bums, kiln under •• ,
construction). . - .. • .
« o Zyo
-
• §"
3 - a '
'* °
'-. o
: -.O:-
to
=- ••n -.
o
-• o.
5 ''.''• Average operating hours per year accounting for scheduled and .unscheduled "down time"
, . ' -C'M-. Hours/Year ' . , . ;,
Qrv
-------
-------
.-Ill-
• S.S= - •
6.-.v. Please describe the waste feed mechanisms used to feed RCRA hazardous wastes' to this •
•.A'ina -to y{ oroac. 4i
•- Liquids: ' . '•" •'. .':'
. . Orurn decani" jf.
Pumpabie Sludges: .'
"to SluiJ.Qey l°Xcg, fjr l^e^4'>ofv. . TO
~
NonpvmpabJc Sludges:
f e
Qjntainerized .Solids: ..
ciruvnS' QrC. i
ocka^
.*.-info)/•"
ic^ . (!>O.ynrlje. t^xrfa'i^c
:'O- .
cn
-------
-------
•
11 "••'
'6. Bulk Solids:
•' -'V-
7. • ' Please indicate the RCRA hazardous waste volume burned in this unit, it's.permitted
• ". • ' capadQ1/and practical capacity in the table below. . C. Bi • .• •
- Type of Waste . •
• Liquids
Punipabk Sludges
• . Nonpumpable ;•
, Sludges
• Containerized
4 ;;. Solids,
-V Bulk Solids
'• Total
Amount burned .
• during first 6
months of 1991 "'
: .(Tons) .
' •••'. • ':'••/'.
•'"'.' '•
"'" l • ' *
• • Maximum '
Permitted Waste ;
., . Capacity
(Tons/ -Year) or
:(Pounds/Hour) ' .
.'•<•• •
'.'' ' '•••-'
: • ' f •
" ' --'
Maximum
Practical Waste "
Feed Capacity •
(Tons/Year) or
(Pounds/Hour) .
'.-.-'
_ ; . :
• ' . • ••'"
* . ,. ,
7a. " ! Were the waste volumes received during the first 6 months of 1991 typical'of what you . ,
expect to receive over the not year? ''If not, how do you' expect waste volumes to change
•.' .after the next 6 months? 1 year? (Le. .provide the .percentage increase or decrease of each
., • . waste form, that you anticipate.) _ •' . . , ,. ' ' : ~.'• •• :
O-
'
en
-------
-------
12
8. .
Please indicate the amount of RCRA hazardous, waste contaminated 'debris and soil
burned and your .capacity to bum debris and- soil by. filling in the table below.
Type of Waste
Debtls!. '
Soils
Amount 'burned .
during first 6
months of 1991
,••'. 0591) ,
:"••-. ... :..-..
. Maximum' ' •
Permitted Waste
Capacity
(Tons/ Year) or .
(Pounds/ Hour) .
••' ' / ". ' ,'••.'•
. . Maximum '
PracticalWaste-
1 .Feed Capacity
. (Tons/ Year) or
(Pounds/Hour) '•''.
. r Are soil volumes and capacities of sofl accounted for in the Bulk Solid .category of
' Table #7? !f notj what categories do they fall under? Please provide percentages of soil
under.those categoriss. .'••" . , . - . "V . .
8b. .Are debris .volumes and capacities accounted for :in the Bulk Solid category of , . .
• . Table #7? If not,.what categories do they fall under?. Please provide percentages of debris
.".. '. under those categories.'.. / '..' - • '-; .• . '. ••• .: • ' .'• . ;' ;.:-... .
: •'-". CRT •-.._' . " -_'L - . ^_^ -_i_L ' " •• •'••' "• •
%'Ps •-
£:i£?
o
o,
to
,hrj
O
O
-------
-------
.:y..
.*».;
13.
Future Capacity of Commercial Incinerators
What other physical changes {eig., changes to feed systems, storage rfrea) are planned for'
this facility that will change it's capacity by July, 1994?. Describe the change and the '
resulting change in capacity by waste form (i;e. the increase or decrease by waste form.)
b<- tiuM-V,
Whit other regulatory changes are planned for this facility that will change it's capacity.?
Describe the.change and the resulting change in capacity by waste form'. .- . -
-'•none.-.-
~.o 2 jo
85 l£ a
to
hd ••
••o. • •--•
o • ••;
on
cart'
-------
N
-------
• 14- .
Other Factors to Determine Future Capacity of Commercial Incinerators (Ctd.)
• 3. •' Arc you prohibited from'receiving any RCRA hazardous wastes from any states? -If so, j
which states? ' . ; . . - • - . •'-'•'. '.;.-••
4.
Are you limited, to receiving a marimum amount of RCRA hazardous waste froin any '
states?. If so,' which states arid what is' maximum amount?'-. . . . ,-'_ .. ."
•• o S jr o
. *«
• a -n 2
<» f •» ^. tn
& ft M» »»
• .- o « -'
n o. n
: e •?••••
"
n .
a
K)
•W'
O
'O.-'-.:
en
en
Uj
-------
-------
Facility Information •,
''Respondent Nane and title: Mf. n.TiUiiao»''FtA •-'"•''Mo irfrgKViq
.",••-• '. - "• ' V .• i .'. '•' .v-
•' Company: .
Phone' Number:_
Fax Number:._
. Same ,'of Caller: ' P <-'dk.Q."sV
. Date of Call:__i
; Tlne; of Cill:
t.€.ST\V.
.2. •Number of units, currently burning RCRA hazardous waste.at this
'Nuiber of'units expected to shutdown by'July. 1996:: •-•. O :—
Additional units expected to cone oh line by July 1994:
Total.huttfcer of units expected .to burn-.RCRA hazardous wastes at this at
tho facility by July 199<>: ' ^L ' ' .. '
' Has this .facility undergone any physical or-regulatory changes in the
• past 2 years that have changed'it's capacity? ''If'so,' briefly'explain. .
I— t^ IV •>! f^
• S-^tS
ft ft .~ »
.
',-• • -hcj.
V''0.'
, o
en
en
'CC:
-------
-------
'"•HI
Infomutlon (ctd.)
Uhae Is th« current over»ll uclllzacion of this ftcilicy'» Incinericlon
capacity •' for : f ollovlng phyilckl forms of. waite?.^ -' '
Liquids - ' ; _
Puip«bl« Sludges ^ _
Honpunpabl* Sludgai _ _
Bulk Solid*' i : . _
Cbn«ain«riz«d Solid* ^ _
Total ; . ' /- • ' ___
o •,.
OJ : l
-------
-------
arg-j- ••
B.
1.
•''••-...•• '4 . ' '
' ' . '. \ Permit Issues . : - ' •"..
'• ' ' , • • ' '• " r "... >•..-.''' • • ' ' .
Have you received- a final RCRA Part B permit? -If -not, vhen-do ycu
' expect to receive a RCRA Part B permit? • '. •'. >'' •
'2. What other pernit(s) are required (e.g. NPDES, Air Emission)? By when?
.. What is the current status- of these permit(s)? •'*•." '.',.. ;
TU.C Pef^.
• - •
o"
. " O'"
-: ' -.0
c^
01
en
cn
-------
-------
• fff f
OT o •
B.:..
3.
«:
'. ' . .' •' Perait Issues (ctd.) ' . .' , ' "
What .RCRA wastes are currently permitted? .If more convenient, please
fax list. Are ail units -authorized for sane. RCRA codes? '-If not. 'please
specify RCRA codes Accepted for each unit. '. •• .
1:4'.. dor. ftt,gf^
..
/UP 38- u>V3;:, kt'lV k.i
'
Are -you adding any waste codes to your pernit? Which ones? When do you
expect approvals? . ; ' . . ' . ... •'
TA.T. Pu IMQ'T Ct
S. .What types of wastes do you generally reject?
frf-
U.Q b !&•> V U
, Km?
r
:• «• •
••3 la*
..
.0
C^
Gsrvt
Crv
i.
w.::
-------
-------
) ',»
c..
1.
•-.;*:.-• v i-,;:?-;. ; ... • :.
Constituent Limitations/ Maxlmun Feed Rates'.
Do you accept troninated vastes (e.g.. activated .aluilna containing ,
ethylene-dibromlde or phenolic;polymers containing methyl bromide)? What
Is your maximum bronlne limit (e.g.-. pounds per hour or.riaxlmun .
'concentration, lii feed)?' -'. ' . ' '/ •
GCLf.fi
|
'^'t'i TCce.Ai'vLv f orpviV ott.'tt'^m^eol- /j'-f-
-D.
. ..
Container t7p«t.that can b« Received a'e the Facility
1. Do ,you •accept liquids. piiapable sludges, nonpuapable sludges, and solids
.'In the following forasr •'. : .. ' . ..'. . '-" ",,'--.••
V CoticaltiftT Typ»'j '
.' , • • \ •
. ••''•'•''. Lab' Pack- . ' '•
I/runs (What Sizes?)
Cubic Yar4 Box.
Cubic Yard-! Bag.
Roll-off. ;.-,:.'•. .
• Dump, trailer.
'-Tanker ';' • •'' •
.Pressure Tanker •- '
(Cusco)- ': -
Rallear
'• Barge • .'•• .•'•. •'
Other (Specify)
. '. •-'•'..-••
••- > -
' U^Uld: >
••.-..'• '- . •
••-'. ' "
'"''•..'•
••••ix--,-,
;-'':''.y*::-
••••••^ ,
. • •
. • , -.
. Futopabla
' Sludge
m. " .
'•-. t/':- '.
:.viX • •:
/ •
'• • , •
Hotipunpable-.'
.Sludge.
' •; ' '.
' '-•
'. :.
•* •
•' •'.' ' •'
..'•'. " "•.'.••
• '•• •
solid; '' '_'•; •'.
• ;. - . , ;•'
.'.'-._• ' ••-' .
'* '•.
• » • '•
.
• o » „
hrj
O
o
UJ
cn
on
Qd
i
-------
-------
Do you accept debris? Please indicate if you accept th« following types
of debris, and any linicacions or conditions of acceptance. .. .-,
• •• • '•.'•'•.-'.'. Hazardous Waste Contaminated Debris Acceptance :
Type, of Debris • '''"-. ' ; •
Common qoUl Materials (e,g, rags, mop
beads, blankets, or clothing) • . ' : : ; •
Persona} Protection Equipment (efr, Tyvex
suits) . ;. ... ••;... '- '. • ••;- ;• -
Paper or Cardboard Materials • '. . -
Filter Cartridges '.'..'
Wood Materials ..'.. .. . '
Rubber Objects (tg- tires, bcses) • '
PVC'Pipe •)-.'.. ' •:•'*• _•:
Other Plastic Debris . . ".'•". •
GUtaDtbris ' • . • v, • "•.,'"
Ceramic Debris (tj, sonkonduaors)
Metal Objects («.(.,' pipes, valves, pumps, nuts
aad bolts) . . , . ' . •.'••'". . ,
Asbestos Materials (ej, shingles. imulaMoo)
Non-Soil Geologic Material (e-g^ rocks) •• ; '
Concrete Debru • - ' ' ' '•-
Refractory Brick .;• • .... .
Other Bricks ... ''. -.'•;'
Slag.' •-.' ' • '•' . ; '-. • .'.•'.'
Intact Batteries .'.,'. ••' , .' -.
Battery Cases .'.-..'
Electronic Components (e.j, printed circuit
boards) • ' , . • ' x
Electrical Wires. Switches, etc, ' . ' •
Accept
.Now
(Y/N)
•V -.*
: tJ. '
W .
; W'V
M :
• *o /.
AJ
N> . .
-• N-'
V ',.
• /o
N-...
>J --;-
. w , .
.10
^
A/:
-: A;
, A; ,
! t^
.-&...•
Plan to Accept
By June 94
' (Y/N) "
'.<•' fV V.
- /k.%
-' ':-'r-: •' '.
• /.V- • •:
', rv
;,KJ ;
u .^
.-•M.-. ' •.•
. M :. '
..ro
V-'Vv.'. .
-,w . .,'
r. .. N-'".-'':".
. W .
. -N
K(
M .
rJ .
' 'N
'-• ;.'.rv'; -; '.
••'>.. N; . V.t
Accepunce
'Conditions -
(e.g. particle size)
' ' •
'.•'•'••' " ' -v
" " ' '-L
':.' •'. -'
f .
. ' '" , •'
. ' '" "
• . • .
a ai «. £ •
• o ** **
-•
*• "_ v*
• § " .v,,
•« - -n
.-:52'-..
K)
'O.'.V
\'UJ- v.^.'-
• '. ' f
CD
£n
en
UD
-------
-------
ill •
10. Please explain any debris acceptance conditions noted on the Table #9..
11. Do you accept soils? If so, under what cc*nditighs or limitations? •
' '
• a .tt " <•
ffxzftz
" o 2 S-o
fill.
a. a. „. jr
' O ** N-
"O.n
o
a
ts)
C3
qh
—j
-------
-------
F.
. . •• . • ••• 9: "
Incinerator Unit Specific Capacity Sheet
1. - Unit #:_[$a<$ question in Section F will be addressed for each
. - until' .' ' "1 _•_ '• ' ' • ' '. •'._'_
"2. Unit Type; _:' 3 ultur C tr MJC ru Ek
3. , 'Thencal Rating:(M BTU/Hourj ISO
4. ".' Status: .Currently Operating (Y/N) i. Planned for 19 ^ - ;
. . If this loin is currently not operating, please indicate current physical and/or regulatory
. ; - . • status (e.g. preparing permit, permit submitted, performing trial bums, kiln under' '
'construction). '..--.. •''"-.• ": • . -••:.''..-• • .'• '• •
5.- Average operating hours per year account ing for scheduled and unscheduled "down, time1'
CKT Hours/Year A .'.•• : v '•: ". •.'. '
-
s?-
- 53
- » o.
0^m,
on
-*J-
i
.-. ••'•/-__j
-------
-------
ll
F.
Incinerator Unit Specific Capacity' Sheet
n
1. .Unit #:Jeach' question in Section F will be addressed for each
•• ' uniti "~. .v ft ; —r, • ••' ',:.^..^-.-_..
UnitType:_
' 5utVs
i£_
3..
v -
4.
Thermal Rating:(M BTU/ Hour)
Status: Currently Operating (Y/N)
Planned for '
. 19
• If this kiln is currently not operating, please indicate current physical and/or regulatory
. status (e.g. preparing permit, permit submitted, performing trial bums, kiln under
construction). :. ".'••.' ~. " ' ' : '".-•.•.'
.. o.
D-
to
•-• .. hcj
o
. o.
Average operating hours per year accounting for scheduled and,unscheduled "down time"
CRX Hours/Year . ; ' ' , .
C3
cn
-------
-------
g- x a: a
' Please describe the waste feed mechanisms used ib feed 'RORA hazardous wastes to this
• unit. • •• ' .-..,-. '. ' :.'- . •' V. • •
! Liquids:
iS dlArt^lu • -fedl -f'ff'm. •Vo/'ke^' Or /••siilt
Pumpable Sludges: '
4 ' PL i^O
. _r i
. Containerized Solids:
'.•'.•Hi
- ' ^ ft t\ '
are,
~~~
- O
to
', -
-------
-------
II'-
' Bulk Solids:
*§*
-
Sg-2
•3 "a '-'
2 on
7. • Please indicate the RCRA hazardous wane volume burned in this unit, it's permitted
capacity, and practical capacity.in the table below.
Type of Waste -
Liquids . '.
Pumpcble Sludges
' Nonpumpable .
Sludges- :,
'Containerized
. . SoJids ' '
, Bulk Solids
:Total '•".•
Amount burned .
during first 6 • .
inonths of 1991 , : .
(Tons)
. •• ' . ' - '•"
';; ••' '. ' . ,
.-••.- , • .; .
-•<: '-.':''': '•".'-.':• '• '
Maximum - • •
Permitted Waste •
Capacity
(Tons/ Year) or
'(Pounds/Hour) .
; ' • V "
;. . •*
Maximum
Practical Waste ; ,' '
Feed Capacity '
(Tons/Year) or
(Pounds/Houi) •. •
'.' ' - . •
•*.
. • ' •'
7a.; - .Were the waste volumes received during the first 6 months of 1991 typical of what you
, expect to receive over the next year? If not, how do you expect waste volumes to change
• after the next 6 months? it year? (Le. provide the .percentage increase or decrease of each ' •
', waste form that you anticipate.) "; . . :
!- CSX - ' " • . /' •'"- : '• ' ': /".' - - '•' -•
;O:.;
to
-..•o -
o-
. ..-U)
-------
-------
12
8. . Please indicate the amount of RCRA hazardous waste contaminated debris and soil
• .burned and your capacity to bum debris and soil by filling in the table below.
• Type;of Waste •
• Debris
' . Soils. . .
• Amount burned .
during first 6 , '-'•
months of 1991
>(1991) :
•,-'•" •••...o' :\-'\;
•/:.:'::& •:''/"••
' Maximum •.
Permined Waste,
. .Capacity . " ..
. (Tons/ Year) or
(Pounds/ Hour)
.."'"•'.- 0 '•••
/". .-i:-o; . •
. • • Maximum
.Practical Waste
;. Feed Capacity
(Tons/ Year) or
(Pounds/Hour):
•. . '. o" ••.-•'• ••
o : :
8a. Are soil volumes and capacities of soil accounted for in the Bulk. Solid category of
Table'#77 if not^, what categories do they fall under? Pleas?; provide percentages of soil:
.' • 'under those categories. '.' " :.. . .;'..- '"/.'• . -. ."•• '' ;• - ;• '.-•.".'• ' )•
•»£!•'
n S n
«.
n 0.-ST
& a "
« S "
•*«»:•
V;O •
K)
->TJ .
•"O .',
U)
8b. Are debris volumes and capacities accounted for in the Bulk Solid category of ; :.' ,
Table #7? If not, what categories do they fall under? Please provide percentages of debris
'• . under .those categories. ... \ -.-'."•• .. r ' :.. • ..."
'•'- ..' ~: " '.•.'•".••••.'.•'•';' '•'..-K)/A:'':.'•"•"•-••'.' .' • - '•••'.- • "• - :•'-''•' '• : .'•''• •'
-------
-------
13
Future Capacity of Commercial Incinerators
•
n •—;-
IQrt.e
U ..- '
i
.2. 'What other regulatory changes-are planned for this facility that wffl change it's,capacity.?
Describe the change and the resulting change in capacity by waste form. ; : \ -
ch
-------
-------
14 '•
G. Other Factors to Determine Future Capacity of Commercial Incinerators (Ctd.) '
3. . Are you prohibited from receiving any RCRA hazardous wastes from any states? If so,
which states?.. r ' •". •'•'•" • . '-.". .
•Il
X 9 tS
«•-«• '
0 ~ O
vB-
**l/
Are you limited to receiving a maTi'Tn"'r> amount of RCRA hazardous waste, from any
states? If so, which states and what is maximum amount? . - • . '
'
to
'-^
' <±>'
-•O.
CD
-------
-------
-
§
•51-
: ' ..'•'" : . •' . Facility Information , • '
Respondent Name and Title: ' fAf- UU'-lVi'o«r>- Fu'i' . jfAgrtefir« (A
' '
Conoanv:
-rte. — PoulcnC -• '
Phone
•Fax Number1:
, Haas of. Caller: '•'" PvcfccoV.
Date of Call: ...
Time of Call: '
Number of units currently burning RCRA hazardous waste at this
facility:." ;
Number of .units' expected to shutdown by. July 1994: ' O «
Additional'units expected to cone on. line by July 1994: O'
Total number, of units expected to burn RCRA hazardous wastes at this at
the facility by July 1994: .1 ' -. • .".-'"..
Has this'facility undergone any physical'or regulatory.changes in the -
past 2 years.that have changed it's capacity?-. If so, briefly explain..,
•" - ' " J". "
--• . 'v • ;i.. ' •'
- I! .
«,§.?•?•
n st .*• a
.ax *«•>-
•» o 2 5-0
•"."ffS-i
• o
, o
• c
•o.-:
o
O
'£3
en
Cd
-------
-------
VI.!!
A.
• 3
.Facility Information (Ctd.)
e. a - «
• c »
•••§"
no
i.
Uhat is this 'current overall utilization of this facility's Incineration
capacity for following physical forms of waste? ' ' '
•Liquids.', •; '• . .. '. . :" '- 1 .'".'' •• ' ^
• Pumpable Sludges " . ..._JLI • •• ' .
Nonpuopabla Sludge* '•" ' -X ' • ..'
8ulk Solids'. ."-..•.'._. ' ...» - ''.-.'.
Containerized Solids X . •• • . •
Total. . • • • . •.'- _ -.1 • '.".•• " '.
rt'
;©
""
J^ '
Cn
UD.
-------
-------
p r
' .Permit Issues
i:
Have you received a final RCRA Part.B -permit?- If'not, when do you
expect to'receive-a RCRA Part-B permit?. ••, ''••'..
.
to
^
O'
o
U)
,2. What other pernit(s) ire required {e.g. NFDES, Air Eoisston)? By when?
• What is the current status of these permit (s)? : ';'
- 'A-.y '•
'g>
-------
-------
£•!»'
s •
• B.
3.
'•'•'••- • -; ' •5 • • -.'.'•• . • •'• •
• . ' , - I , , . ' • .•'.'."
.-'•'•. ' r ' . •
.. '. , ..-. . .Feraie Issues (ctd.) . • •' '•.'••- -..'
What RCRA wastes are currently .permitted? If oore convenient, please
tax,list. Are all units authorized for same RCRA codes?- If not please
specify. RCRA codes.accepted for each unit. • . •.
Of +W yiru/tn {
ttlO-3S-, '
-r' .rnr, CiCfs.ei
fc tlJ • K. I'tflj-.O01 j r
4.
Are you'adding any waste co .£nfcetioua--. mu/lionat ^^A:oc
rE'iaAf V.I1I6-,--
•'"
to
;W
.0
^
CD
QQ
-------
-------
.!
••1
C.
1.
Constituent- Limitations/ Maximum Feed Rates
Do ypu-aceepc bromiivsted wastes (e.g. , activated alumina, containing
ethylene dibronide or phenolic polymers containing methyl bromide)? What
-is your nmximun bromine Hole (e.g., pounds per hour or maximum •'•"'.
concentration in feed)? J • \ • •• '• - ' • . . '
D.
. . ...
Container typet that can be Received at the Facility
1. • . Do you accept liquids, puopable sludges, nonpumpablo sludges, and . solids'
• ,"in the following forms? " - . . •' -. •• , _. ~ . -' "•. _•' '<.
• - Container Typ* ;
• Ub Pacic
, Druos (What Sizes?) ,
. Cubic Yard Box
Cxibic -Yard Bag
. Roll-off
! ..." Duoptrailer.
Taifiket ; '.'. '
' • ; Pressure Tanker
. (Cusco) -.
Railcar ,
•. - . Barge • ..
Other (Specify)'
.' ' ' ,:- '•' .'• '' ''--
Liquid
- '- ,:
•V^:.
, / '
IX^
• : . \ •
Puapable .
"Sludge
• , .- . .
• .
" •><'' -..
' ".(/', "'
'- '*s: ' ,
: - "
'j
NoitpuxopAblo •
Sludge ;.
i
• ''•'-•'.•••
•.••'•".'•,:••
. / . .•- -•
'- .'•• ...... .
Solid
•'"•'. *
• . "~
-• •_•"• '. ':
*
•» o 2 5-0
. tt aw!.
' S " -
. 5 -a. <> -
o
'O
ts>
trj-
.0'
O
C?
can
°Q
NJ.
-------
-------
s
Do you accept debris? .Please indicate i.f'you accept the'following, types
of debris, and any limitations or conditions of acceptance. _ '• :
» §"•
'. ., •' •' Haordoos Wute CootimiMted Dtbrii Acceptance ....
Type of Debris " •, •'.- • '.;
Common 'doth Materials {c.f, njs. mop !
heads, bbnkeu, or doihing) .
Personal Protection Equipment (c.g^ Tyvex •.
soils) •''.;.•
Paper or Cardboard Maierials
Filter Canri(J|es ' '. . ; ...
Wood Maierials .. . . _
Rubber Objects (e.&. tire, hoses) : , •.'
PVCPipe. '. , . . ' ,
Other Plastic Debris .
Glass Debris •= -^ . ' „ , -,{ :
.Ceramic Debris (e-&. semicomJoctors)
Metal Objects (e.g, pipes, valves,- pumps, nuu
and bolls) '.. - .. '. .
Asbestos Materials (tg., shingles, insuhtion)
Non-Soil Geologic Material (e.g, roots) '
Concrete -Debris -'\ -
Refractory Brick '.'. ! ' .-.-' •'.•-..'
Other Bricks '.'•.•• .
Slag.-. ' "• - , ."••. -','. -.
Intact Batteries •-. . .' '. •' • •'-...- ...
Battery Cases . •
Electronic Components (eg., printed circuil
boards) . .
Electrical Wires, Switches, etc. . V -. ; *
Accept
No*
Of/N):
N'
rJ
w.
' M
>J
10 ';
-AJ
N>
/Vl .-,
fJ
tJ.'
N
rJ
ru .
M
V
tJ '
w
..AJ-
; ;.'(v>. •;
. ;./y .
Plan to Accept '
' By June 94
. . (Y/N)
:. T^.-V-
rj
•'.. \rv , • '.-'
'!'*>''
rx/1
N ;
- -V
, >J .
. ..N> .;
NJ ; .
/V;--. ';
: M . •
K/- -.: .
. . M .
•W. .--.-
• jv : .
M
M
N •'•'
• :'.M: . '
; N-
Acceptance
Conditions •
• .(e,g. particle size)
• - ". '•'",
.-
'".'•' ' ' V
. . - • • ' - '-
• • i '• " V.',.. ' ".
• ' \ "'•./'
• .•' '" -.'',."
- ,
; / *•-,'"' :
.'. ; ; ,>. =-,'
J- . •
-'"'• - .- ,-• '•}':
« ' '" -
7^ " - '- "
*' . .* *;
- -'O-. .
o ,-
OD
-------
-------
• O
':•?
-- ' *.
10. Please explain any debris acceptance conditions'noted on the Table #9.
'3-v' •-•-.-•• —
11. Do you accept soils? If so, under what conditions or limitations? .
p »•. ,
f S*r '
g- X, SB «• Z
3 b g-o
""1
••o'
O
• O
cn
CQ
-------
-------
F.
9
Incinerator Unit.Spilcific Capacin- Sheet
3.
4.
Uuit #:Jeach question in Section FwilUbc addressed for cnch
unit] •'"'..• • . •• •'.-..
2. Unit Type:_
'
-------
-------
"f*
;_.-•.-.-'- .; 10 ._•-.• . • . •.,.-..
6.. Please describe the waste feed mechanisms used to feed RCRA hazardous wastes to this
unit • ' . " • • . • '•'••' , .,'.. .-• ' ' ... .-• . • • • • .
Liquids:
Ifvta
• '.' Pumpable Sludges: ' ":;
NoDpumpable Sludges:
., • .
'<;iu«iy-< arc
Tt
Containerized Solids: :'•'. . • . ".'. "'•'
fci\\iaf .
ft-**'
-•Jaflf
- s.<* - „ i
, a o. — «•
... o. » „
n
- '
o
O.
O:
cn
cn
-------
-------
11
6. : Bulk Solids:
K/A
• 7. ' Please indicate the RCRA hazardous waste volume burned in this unit, it's permitted'.
capacity, and practical.capacity in the table below. Cfc]T; . ', , •
Type of Waste
• Liquids :-
Pumpable Sludges
Nonpumpabh .
.Sludges .
.Containerised
••"• .-: Solids. :i '
'! Bulk Solids
. • Total :
. Amount burned' •
. during first 6 -
months of 1991
(Tons)-
... [ . • - . - .
" t :
'. - '• '" '
" ' .' ••' , - '
.•"''•
Maximum • '
Permitted Waste
'•• Capacity . . • .
(Tons/ Year) or
.(Pounds/Hour)
• ' • ; " - '
.•'•••/••
Maximum ' ;:
Practical Waste
.Feed Capacity
(Toris/Ycar) or •
(Pounds/Hour) ;
"'••-.-• ' •-•• ••
. .-
's *
. . 1
*"
7a. \ •• Were the waste volumes received during the first '6 months of 1991 typical of what you
expect to receive over the next year? If not, how,do you expect waste volumes to change
., • • . after the next 6 months? 1 year? (i.e. provide the percentage'increase or decrease of each
waste form'that you anticipate.) ' •' -. :.,:',
•. n ^.-n
•' c r «
-.» §,"-
-
•:' o-.1.--
o .
cn't
CD!
-------
-------
12
.8. Please indicate the. amount of RGRA hazardous waste contaminated debris and soil
, '. . burned and your capacity to bum debris and soil by filling in the table below. ' • J • ...
Type of Waste
„ Debris '
-.:. .Sous- ..
' Amount burned
during first 6
, months of 1991 •
(1991)-
• '. ':''-';0. "•':;• . .
'-,-: '•'• 0': ••••.-:
; Maximum .j
Permitted Waste.
. ^Capacity
(Tons/ Year) or
(Pounds/. Hour)
•-•-. 6 •••••-.
""'-••0; ''••". /
••" . Maximum
Practical Waste
Feed- Capacity :.
(Tons/ Year) or .
.(Pounds/Hour) '
-' OVv'V
--. o.
Sa. .Are soil volumes and capacities of soil accounted for in the Bulk Solid category of
Table #7? If not, what categories, dp they fail under? Please provide .percentages of soil
under those categories.'"' -...'.•' •• .. . ': . . •- • • '• • ''' • '. • ^' '.
" s,- S» q
a . ?r a *-» •
C5 5 (i M S
'• ? -.0 O
l» » - ;_tn
•ft ft - H
• .o " „
- •
Is)
• • • • hi •
'. o.:'
U)
8b. Are debris volumes and capacities accounted for in the Bulk Solid category of ,. '''•
'' • . Table #7? If not. What categories do.they fall under? Please-provide'percentage's of debris
under those categories. .' . • : ••""'•: ' '•• • '..-. ." • . .' . ••'••'.
\
C3-1
CQ
-------
-------
.."I gg-.-v
?'S.*" " . '
• . 13
.Future Capacity of Commercial Incinerators
B tl n •« S
" n -<» D
o ™ ~ — . tn
& £X Mb VI
I
What other physical changes (c^, changes to feed systems, storage area) arc planned for
thisVacflity that .will change it's capacity by July, 1994? Describe the change and the
resulting change in. capacity by waste form (i.e. the increase or .decrease by waste form.)
PifnAont
QfC,
e. C?
"'4-a
iv'-
J
. What other regulatory changes "are planned for this facility that will change it's capacity.?
Describe the change and the resulting change in capacity by waste form. . .
< to
•O
O
U)
c^
Ql
CQ
M3
-------
-------
14
G. ' Other Factors to Determine Future Capacity of Commercial Incinerators (Ctd.)
3.
Are you prohibited from receiving any RCRA hazardous wastes from any states? If so,
which states?.' ' '. • :- . '.'. i ,. ' •"-.'• . ••. . • •• ' \
rVo
4. Are you limited to'receiving a ciaxunum amount of RCRA hazardous waste froin any •• ••'
.•states? .If so,-which states and what is maximum ainouht? • • • • . ' :- ••
.or
'O-
to
.HTJ.
'C>'
-o
CD
-------
-------
BJG-21-19S1 B8.'24 FROM
, •> ,91703934970 '. F.03
Kuob«r of unit* currently burnlnj R.CRA butttfovur'»a*e« at chit
'
jfu»b*r of unt* «icp«ct«d to thut^oyit by July 1804;
Addltlotvtl uait*^ix?«cud -to; 'coma on ltn« by July
lotcl w«b»r e£ units. «xp«ct»d to bum'RCSA htzardovs vnt*a ft.thlt at
th« ftellttar by July 19S»: V '' • ". ' . •.' '•-; ;
'
Baj;thl» 'facility undergone «ny phy»l«»l or t*|ui«tozy dh»ne«« in
2 y«M» th«c brr*. cKuvg«d:ic'i OptcltyT •!£ to, btt'iifly
. tl
e. a. ~»
' 9 *> ~
2 o. n
' 5 g s
.3 -a
:',- ° 2
o
K>
-O :.
to
c:f
at
~ ."* • l
cd
-------
-------
A.
4.
TO
9173393^9740 P.03
-------
-------
• 5
If Is". 5
Vh»t It eh» current cutui «f th«it
-------
-------
TO
III
"•0.25-0,
.''-.• ''•'•'. ' • -;-:: "• ' ''•• . ' s :.'.'." • . • '•
i • "' •• '•'. • • "• ' ! . . ' '. •' •-'..'•
8. . . -.':' ,...•..,."'•. '• ?«tait iitu«« (ctfl.)'- •••••••
3. tfh*C RCKA v«»c'»§ «r» eurrtatly p»ecitc«d?' If abrii eettvie
' f*x lite. ' AJT» ill \aoiu authorized fee *ia* RCJA ood«*?
" ipiclfy KGKA eo4*i »ce»y«« • ..'•".."' •. .-,• ; •:, -. '. , •'.'•.': -
' ' . ' .- '' .-:'•: ' •• '•'.''• '•'"•'.' •':
". .,- • . ' ;' . ' . . . ' ' .-'.. ••• ...
'• .'"•'.' . '. ' ' • ' ..•.'"•'•
•6. *<;» you aiding »ny v««t*'.eo
" ; '".. •,. .V''.. ' 'I'-'1- -.• '' '-.' . • : .:-'*• ' '': '
. ' ' . t '".'•' -' • - , .'..'.',.
• ' •"'. .-- •.•' '••:'•'•'.."• -• ••• .
5;' . ^i^V* -!S? txJL*Te7"ye^^«^oe6 • •**
'•'•: &**e>7oiu^&«<« -.-..•. ' '
' . '. •" '.- " ; ,'••' ."'.•' • .: '• ' "•••'.-••
•• \ ..'.•;':-' • .•'• • - ;
L*ac, pl«*i« .
12 IMC,/ pl«M«
'•.-'• .: .
'-''-. • ": •
. • . •.*. f
'• : .' , "
i?. Vh«n do you
• ,:,;.;.;.
t. . • '. . ' •
.-'. -. ,••• •••
• ..'.' - ''• ••.
.•-. .- : • . •
* •• '.
Luu/,^fl
... -. .
> £1 h- M
, o n
° o. <*
c — **
• " g " •
9 - a .
Eon
: • • "O'
O
o
-C-
-------
-------
• c »«
•
i
)
• " _ . «JG-
-
"".'!
-' \
<
. • ; , ' ; .
v " • '
.. . . i
i ' '
21-1991 B?:26. FSOM • '•'. \ ••'. " ' \ • .TO • . 917
•••••.'••'"-:'••:..'''•' : '- : « .''•'•. • • • ••
,.-. '.'•;• .-'•:.•••..•'•••.'• -. '.' "• ;
B, . • -OoaitltMnt UKiutlon*/ Xulrim F**d R*t«i
L. ' 3o you »ce»pt bfoal'ftic«d vutt't («.|., »etlv»t«d ilunln*
• tthyl«M dibreBid* gt'ptncgllo polyatrt containing Mthyl
U your a»xlaum braala* -Ilalc (•.{•• poundi p»r hoos or »
«orw«ntt»tlon in f«*d}T _ • , •' ' •
• .. ' f
J. . .. '• CD«t«ta«r t7p««, th«t din ."b» ,B*c«iT«d at th« Ftctll
1. Do you uc*pC liquid* , . frtmpabl* «ludj»«, n«mpuncp«hl« «l,ud
."-. i« tb« following fanwt •'• . '.-..; .•".. .•• • .'"•'•-
-_"•• c
BSUM
Cubic Y«d Box . '
Cubic Y»rd Btj
' Eoll-off
' Dyaptr.ll.r .
•V''. .;.t«nk«1f -.--..
/' . Prwjur* .Tuikar *,
(Cuico)
. «*tlc«r .
. . •' , ' B»rg« .-.• . . p ' •
• " . ' Cthtr (Sptclfy) '
^Sg|
u^v
K
i^is^f''
. VVS
,KT>
v"'wo' .':"
v^
***'
-a--'-.'
u*4- :- '•
•..•'-.
Puagtbl*
Sludgo
'..-••- x •••'--.••.
•Vf»-ts^:'
gtjjts*irrj
wo ': • ..
S^i^
n • . :
tljt,
:w :- /'•'.
Kvo • '
Vu>
t££l2U**^
: ' '• •- ''. •
i j.^j^jLi-^ Jf«v.?iy^
JH -fix « r\t«J>jL» vu^ucU.
KoopuBpabl
SIud|t
• ' ' • • - . ' «*'"..**•
, . • - - " 2. *•*' 2 ~
•'.''• sas*g
j - • ' - "^ • ft V- ^
Q. Q. — 5"
- . • • • . • o *• _
' . . • . . o • rwld»)7' vftu'p ' .. . : '. . '- •
ixicuffl ''. • ' . ' '
.;•.•-. ' . - -
T ;. :' '.,. ' . •" • : . ' ' .,'•'•- •
l«i,.«ad lolidt
y 1
V*->v<:
• i
,,ii- i
'.•..!**»." -.
: • -vio'.
TUXL'w <>"%^ "
T , ^
* •• " - "''-.•' V
^
Vet
solid . . :
X
•*V!M
«4£ttMT'.
no .
SiCovblT
. ii '' .
vu>- .
;:^>\
• 'we •
Wo
tJCKi. »x.
pL»->d^. oM""
*^.
ftf^vOvv'T'vhkv
•".-•• "". o" '•
: . "• ' .-• ' '••"••> " ;
chuW" '.' . '... \
*jLc*£) • . '..'•-.' ••
'O: .
D .
to
O .,
O '
DO,-.,
'f-w^;
uri'
• c
-------
-------
«JG-2i-1991 .68:26..FROM
T0 . . 9173353*9740 P.07
Do W» «SC««
'
• 7.-. ''
l*M» lndtc«» If you «ee»pt ti
Caaam OMliM««!ia (*#t np. mop
Pwiaii Ptotwdon EqBijnMkt (*.». Tyvtt
' •'• ' ' -
Ptpet of Cndbond Mttttitb .'.
Robbii Otjtcti («.|, ttra, bo»e»>
bite Flute Drtcir
Otnmle P*W1 («.(» unicoodeoan) •
M*al Otyecn (&{,, ptptt, ntw, panp*. nata
'
Aibwtoi Mturiik (e-t,
twUttioa)
•BaiwyCam
Beetroaie Compootea {*,», pttand 'tUeait
' ' -' '
Elecuictl Wira, Swltcho. eu:
Aooni.
No-
(WO
- Y
•
.y.-
TtuwXocem
••v ,
>• follovini type*
nc», •'..'. " .
Aoaptauco
CondittOU .
(«.&. ptrdd* «tas)
V»t" SLCXtf So/Id
JS*
fi
»
» ? ~« 2
a n - »» tn
1
K>
>Tj
O
o:
U31
-------
-------
fiUG-2i-i93i' 00*27
•TO
F.88
* . • ' . '. " . f
'•'" ;. .-' ."'• ."'•"••'• . .". « -. ••-''<' ; ': -v
10. pleate explain' •aydebrii acceptance conditions noted on the Table f
f) N«l- 4t> ja/kii)i 3.6&XW PoilCAAC. -u^i^A^'f^u^uLCi
' ' ^) '* • ' ' • 1 VvwJJ^i*«~ t^ro | bk^-v "
' ^ nv*4>- JvAtJf' KIAJIAA. rwklfi Outttioli^&MA^ffv^*
• ^ TK^ii"»«iut 4U«.«Jjfl WiwIFto' C^Jxa^cyft f
Vi pju^n^ «k aL^ri^^^J .-••••' J
:,"--- -. • : ;;r> . .. .- • -v:.'-.. '.v '•• ' ;. :..;••:;
-. ,; , •...-.••/•. ^:_ '.. ..- ; ,. \ "';. - • 'V.; •'.
.'.:•••'. -. :•'.'.- '• •' '' • ' . •' '- '.'••' •' ' '': " '•'''.
... - " .- ' :",•''.• .'-,-•'.'• . '"".,'
11. ' Po you .accept loUs? If to, under what condition! or limitation*? .
• '.'•' ' • > ; ".' - ' • ' . .-''"". ••'
.'.•'...-.•••'.•• : .•• ''•'•..'• '• :' •.''," ':';."-': '•• '' :'.'.':; '
9. •/.;.•.••••.-'•.;'•
j^- . . '. • • . •
/ • .
A ' .• • ' •
fJv^tt«Ajjub
.O.J.
-* "
o .;.
cn
-------
-------
P
I'-
: .OUG-21-1931.
-P.'
S.
TO. , ', .' ; 9179393^97^3 P.e8
-^:~—-rp-- .;- •••-;•-=
li Unit dfc teach aue«'
Incinerator Unit Specific Capwtfy Sheet
tion in Section F wfll be laddregsed for etch
Unit Type:
"
l Ut .
J-i
Statui: Coiientfy Opentniig (Y/N) V jPlanaed fat ,
ff this Kb i» currently not operating, pkase indkate current phyilcal ind/or regulatory
t (e-g.' prepwinj permit, permit nibmilted, perfcrming ci-ud buntti, kfln under
'«*-.; '.."7'- ... •''-. >'••"'.-.:.'---/'- • .'•
Avenge operating noun pec year accounting for icbeduled and unscheduled "down time'1.
Hbun/Yegr ! ..-'.;. '"•.-.•• '.:.•'.•..'• . - • •: _' '- :
. .
".025-0
" O **'»-
8 o-2 .
W;
.O .
O
'-. •- -.i-s1
C3
on
UD
C30
-------
-------
RUG-21-1991 . 08=26
TO
917335349740 R.10
10
«. Pkuo deKdbe the wute feed mecbanismt uwd to feed RCRA hazardous wastes to thi*
' " ' '
Liquids: '
Fmnpable Sludjw:'
Koapumpable Sliidgei;
Containerised Solkte , '
• UTO
Fie.
' \li*
\
,§ X SB 2. _
Ja2j|
a
O"
O
cri
-------
-------
RUG-21-1931 08=29
TO
91733=3497d3 -, P.11 Y. .
BuIkSoUdK>,
riof
fvd-
7. . Tieate indJcste the RCRA hidrdom wutfl vohim* burned In thi* rajt, iff pennltted
y, and practfc*] capacity fn the tibia b«lpw. :-• l , [ : . •
1>pe of Waste ,
Liquids
PmnptbJe Shidgn
NonpujEpiblfl •
" • Shidge* '
Cootsiceiixed .
".. -. SoUds --
BuftSclUi
...'total , .
Amount burned
during fint 6
maathi of 1991 -
: (Tab)
\*j\VO.S
IK.
.--• '0-- :•: • .
ffjiZ.Sf .. .;.
•.'.•" o . '" •'"-..
•-\i< I?1-
Mudnmm .
Permitted Wsjte .
Cip&cicy •' '-•'
.CTbnj/Yetr)or :
(Poundsffloiar)
V •• • /
•-•Ni.' ..-/••
-.•-X: '.n
••:/:. :'^.
/ ^ \
2.J,93t'*/«A.
Mini
Pactica;
FeedCi
(TomA
(PoutKb
.•
7a, -' Wen the waite volume! recdvied during the Cfit 6 monUis of 1991 ty
. cipect to receive over the next year? If not, how do you expect vrastc
" after the next 6 months? 1 year? (ie. provide the percentage increase
w»ite form that yoa anticipate.) . . ;. \
ium, .
Wa^te
yacity •
eir)br .
llotir)
". -
< j' ' •
* t
• ..
* /.
k
s .
i]cal of what you
volume* to change..
or decrease of each
Ytf * —J
9 Z S- O
n •»
• « - •> 2
n » -.. -„, m
ft a — »
=•"
.'• ": '"••• • ' VO.' . .'' '
. -' ' -.O- . .:•
C3
, . !•
£3'"
'ci'
-------
-------
flUB-21-199t B8=2S • FROn
• TO ., 917339349740 . F,12
8. Ple»*efaKjfctt«theamoujrtofRC^haz3idouswMteccmtamlM
binned and 7001 capacity to bum debrii ud soil by ding-in the tab! & below. "
TypeofWtste
Debris
Sob
Amount burned
. during fint 6 .
xaojrtlu of 1991
•-, (1991), :_.
Ptxinitud Watte
-• ' ^nfim f *tl_l
utpicny .
(Tow/Year) or
(Pciiadi/Hour)
-*ir
Pnci
M jdmum
Cipadty
(Tom ' Year) or
(Poii idi/Hour)
St. Are wfl volume} and capacities of lofl accounted for in the Bulk Solid category, of
Table *T? K not, what categories do they fan under? Fleaie provide '^percentage*. o£ wfl
. TOdw tiote eattgorie*.' • .. ~ -.-.-:
.- No —
'8b. Are debra volumes and capaetie* accounted for Jn the Bulk SoUd citpgoty of
Table #7? If not, what categories do they fall under? Please provide percentages of debiu
under '•' '': • - ' '
B. O. «--M.
• 2 -** —
.2 & S
•• ™
o
O
tsJ
O
o,
C2
-------
-------
•6UG-2:-1931 88:29
P.13
' Fmtnre Cap&ciqr of Conuntrdil Incinerator*
mat other physical change* (e^., changes to feed synetm, itorage am) are planned for
this &cflfcy that wffl change H'i csptcty by Jufy, 199f? Describe tlie Uwiigc and the
refusing change in capacity by waite fcnn (le. the increase or deeretse by w;
gifaoteO
other regulatoiy changes are planned to this &dfity that .will chanje it'i capnety.?
dhwigo.»nd ti« reidting citnge fa apaciQf by wajte tonn. , .. .
ff
2. - 2-
- °-
3 ~a
. S o sr
.
:•• '-to' .
^1 .
:o;- •'
'- O' /
-------
-------
«J3-S:-1931. E8:29 FROM.
TO
5170393^=7*0, . P. 1J
V*
~~ <»> Oft* ButoM t» PctemJM Fatnrt Capacity, of Commecctol heUJtateri (
~ . 3.> ' Are you prohibitedtan receiviag gnyRCRAbuardouiwanei,from anx •*>»*? If to,
'(CK.)
4. ' Axe yon limited to rewlviiyj i laadmuai
««te*? If 10, wkichtt«tei and wfatt b n«xinium unount?
g ?
-
-I -5' B
n <* -. „. m
. Q. Q. — «
8 S •
. o
d-:-.
N>
hd • •
•• B/-
. .'• U) ' ;
cr<
-------
-------
rt
. .„.
end iitl
•- v; 2° • . • •;-.
facility Infornitian
Todd Raba, Sales Manager '•
. • Maxine Weldman, Technical Representative.
ROLLINS EJiVIRnN'MENTAL SERVICES {N'J) . INC. __ - . - , - -
(609) 467-1040
Nam* o.f Ctller:.
•:D«WO£ cku: •*:
Tine of!c«U:_l
Kuab« of! unit*, currently burning RCBA hazardou*. vaice at-this. . ' . ; - .-
f«eility:Li_ ''.*'.:.'-•' :.•'•.'- '•/ .
.
Nuabet of unit* »xptcr«4 to shutdown by .July 199t; '.'••'' 0 '• •
Additional units »jip«ct»d"so eon* on line by July. 1994;' 1
' Tottl nxwber of unit* expected'. to burn RCRA. hazardous w«'t«»"»c this sc
the fMllity by July 1994: _L_H___ . "• '
Ha« thi»:f«cilityluadergon» any pjiysle*.! or regulatory ehang»e in th»
past 2 y«ar» chat ha vt changed .it's'capactty?1 If so,:. briefly explain.
D£ Direct By
Fad
-Pad
o S jr o
:^.n2 ->.
•nil-
.. a. M. <*
o •> - :
O a. (l
e ? »•
a:
K)
>TJ
O.
o
..... . ->^-
C3
•-T^
cs
,-J^:'
-------
-------
'A.".- '.'-• ': . ;•-' Fteillty Info'tmitloti » . :
Containariztd Solid*
'
26
100
fill
5 o 2 jr o
a"?S-"'S
' Ft **" A M
• ? «,» f>
n ™ •» -. tn .
' : O
- O:
-------
-------
s.
1;
P«nalt
H»v» you received.« 'fitul RCRA Pirc B perait?; If no;, «h«n 46••you ,
axpccc to r«c»tv« a R.CRA Part B parmlt? • ' ' . : ' • ','
Yes
2.
•Uh»c other pernitU) *r« r4nuir«dX«.g- NPDES, Air Enlsiton)? By vhen?
What it the current iticui of thsse p«rnit(s)? . • '• ' •• • '•
See Attached.
z a-
- 2.
<* _ o
2 o sr
'O
U '
K)
... ^d
o
o
U)
"*~J
en
-------
-------
B.
3.
• • , , ". >'" . •. . F«ral6 iMuai (ctd.) - • • . \ .
Kh&e RC8A;v»sc«» «• :curr«ntlx pormiseedT .If BOB* conv»ni«nt, pit*
f»k li«.; Are all unit* »u:horlzBd for'same RCRA cod««? .If noe, .pl««««
«p«cify RCRA. eode*, aee»pt«d for e«ch unU.
"'• ''.See Attached. J_ • : — '- '•—'—-—• •
4. !
A» .-you *ddl»8 »ny ,«m« cod.i' w, yoic permleT , Which on«? Uhw do you
,/expaee »pprov»l»?.- •" ' ' ' •' ^-..' ' ... ; •' .'•-"',•
•'. ' .'\ •!•-.- ' ' '• ."":'•'.'•.."' • v " ": -' .' •
" . • .''•'. All waste codes listed 1" ^Q CFR 261 except "dlmcin" codes. ..
: ' RES (NJ> is "constantly" Adding «aste codes as they are —
uigated.
'.5. HK»t. types, of w»»t«» do ybu:g«ntraily r»J«ct7 .
. ,-. TSCA.regulated vtaste. dioxlns; explosives/ radioactive,.
poison A's, asbestos, see
attached list.
W
o. a -
2 " '
-;'' ! :
•s
hcd
- r.,
,O'
o
-------
-------
ROLLINS
•M, ^L C.WIROSMC.VTAI. SUMCTS
June
•TO: -
24, 1991 -
' ' - '
.',' •'..'-.'
•'.,•' Maury Hunt ' • . '. ' .. .'•...-
;--.< . ••"•'. a A 1 •• • . ' .
''PROMS.' Lewis. R.
SUBJECT: List of
RCRA
Permit ;•• ' •
(OB09D1HP01)
•, Schoenberger ' <£*$><£_ "• ' •'',.••
Permits - ' ! ' '.. .'•••'•'
• • ,s • Date ' Expiration
-' :* |5^ugd; ' -. Date ;
" -03/31/90 03/31/94
' . . Revi'sed-
, . , ''- 09/29/90. • . ... .
- 04/04/91 i'
; ... 05/14/91 •'-.-.
. '"
Required Renewai ,
. :&EBlication ' Date-
. ^ '.09/30/93
• 1 ** •-" ,'
HJPD1ES ;.(NJ0005240)
Air .Perwit. for
, Tank Faria'- Incinerator
operating- (Log: HO. 8,2ilis)
Air Permit' for .Incinerator/
Tank Farm.'-1' Incinerator,.-not
Operating (040073) .•
Air P.erniit..- incinerator
Stack (68328) . - .
Air Permit - Tank 323 .
(70293)
Air Permit -.. Preaeration
Tank V-203 (Log- No." 88-1679)
• -.' . •' '•' . . ' i-.
•Air' Permit - Cooling Tower
(78964) . .. - ,
Air Permit'- Line Slaker
(70539). . • v
Air .Permit' -'.Sludge Dryer/'
Coridehs.er. (85318),
net JO-ISMS
08/10/87 ; 0?/14/89
08/18/88
RES(HJ). submitted '.
• renewal'application.
This will eventually supersede
68328 (listed below).
08/14/79 08/12/94
08/19/84 ' 07/13/91
(With " '.-• • • .,.'• ;
numerous . ' • . '••
90 day !
extensions) ' •-.':';
..12/18/84 06/10/96
•, 05/12/94
H/A • (Temporary •.
.permit automatic-.
a 1-ly renewed) -~,
03/10/96
08/27/87
01/18/85 .'
07/29/88
(With :.
numerous '.
90- day •
. extensions)'
08/10/95.
01/18/95
07/13/91
- . ' '05/10/95 '.'..'":
- 10/18/94
'N/A "(Temporary,.
. permit 'automatic-
ally' renewed).
•» *-> •
•:»«&'
.a
to
.^Tj
o
•.o-'
-------
-------
Page Two ' •"; '. .. •'•.
.•Air Permit - Hot Oil Heater
, (80903) ' , . . .
Air Permit - 200 HP Steam
Boiler (73816) .'•-;
'Air Permit - Cooling Tower-
" (92136) . .. .
.' Air. Perjsit"'- T-3.12 (96812)
Air Permit - 'Approval to
Alter T-312 (01903371)
s DRBC Permit•T Permit' for
Drum Storage and-Basins.
B104, BIOS, Bill, ,B112, -
8113 and B122 .
(D69-152-1) ;
DRBC Pernit- - Groundwater
Abateaent (D69-i52r2)
DRBC Permit':-. scrubber
Water and Biosystea'
Clarifier (D69-152-3)
DRBC Permit.-, Groundwater
. Abateaent. Well {D70-170)
DRBC Permit - Surface Water
Supply (D-72-49) ••;.
DRBC Perait •*-. Cool ing Tower
and. 1.2M gal Wastewater •• ,,
Storage Tanks (D-84-38)' . -
.•'•..;- ' '*
DR8C Pemiit —'New Clarifier
and;Keatek r
• n -« 2
n * S- tn
09/27/72
N/A .
. 11/08/72 N/A
07/31/74 H/A
Aaended 6/17/75,
12/17/75, 12/8/76,
3>3b/77, 7/1/77,.
11/30/77
09/25/74 ' • H/A - '
09/25/74 K/A
09/22/87
05/25/88 N/A
07/02/87 07/02/92
to.
replace T-312)
N/A. • ' '
N/A
H/A
N/A
.N/A
.H/A
N/A
N/A
o
OJ.
-------
-------
Stream Encroachnteht - Pernit 07/21/87 08/07/92
. •'•• for earthen berm, 2 storm •''..' •'...-
water outfalls, place fill' . :' . ' ,
; "V and construct various buildings •
V- for, incineration (13580) ' ....
Regulated Medical Waste 05/01/91 N/A .
'Intermediate-.Handier : . .". • • .
(0809D1HP01) .
3
B206 & B207 Closure Plan
(HJPDES Permit 5240) . '
L Series ' Lagoon /Closure ' . 06/28/88
Plan {NJPDES, Permit 5240) .
Guardhouse brun Pad Closure 04/06/90
Plan (under^RCRA Permit) .
, A new,.' perait
..'application will
• be required by,
at .least, 2/7/92
K/A
06/28/88 07/28/93 N/A :
07/28/93 -..
01/28/93
, Approx: . 'H/A:
10/06/90. : . ..;,..
• .Closure is-still-.on "going'.
NJDEP is aware of delays..
Closure responsibility-..••' '
shifted to 3008{h) 'interim
measures work plan..
-
'•? *"S
<» * •* «. w
o
-a
to
->ri-
o
o
LRS\ne
-—j
-------
-------
I •
I
I
AUTHORIZED WASTES .' . '•.. ' .'.'.• ." , . •
(A) • Waste* Accepted For Incineration ." ; -.•;'....
, The permittee is authorized to accept the following hazardous wastes for-
'storage, blending .and Incineration: . •'.'.-'.'' '. ' - •
NJDEP -Hazardous ' ' •'.- ; ' '' • • , •
Waste NumberDescrtotion of Hazardous Waste" . . . ,
DOOl
D002
-D003
-"." 0004
'.,0005
. D006
.D007
, D008
', 0009 '
0010
DOU
.0012.
a.
b.
d.
Ignitabi'e'.'not.otherwise classified ••'".- ' , ' .,
Corrosive, not otherwise classified ' . ,, -'. ' - ..
• Reactive, hot otherwise classified • • ' -. . •• ,
The' permittee shall not accept a solid waste that exhibits
characteristics of reactivity If a representative sample of the
waste has any of the following properties: • ..
It forms potentially explosive mixtures with water.
It Is capable -of deto'nation or' explosive reaction if it is
subjected to a strong Initiating.source-or If heatjd under
confinement. ' '< ; '••• . . '••-.-.' .
It is readily capable of detonation or explosive
decomposition or reaction at standard temperature'and
pressure. ' ; '. "' ' •- " • •..•'•- -, '.-'-•
It Is'a forbidden 'explosive as defined in 49'CFR 173.-SI, oc
a Class A explosive. »s defined-in 49. CFR 173-.S3 or a Class E
explosive as defined In 49 CFR 173.88; :
Arsenic by'EP.Toxlclty test ; '' ' ' ' '"'.'
Barluia by EP .Toxlclty test ' • • - " . ' .-
Cadaiuniby. EP Toxlclty teit •;...'.'. '
Chroaiua'by'EP Toxlcity test • . '.
Lead by IP Toxlelty test .'. . . ' . : '
Mercury by EP Toxlclty.;test •. •'
Selenium by EP Tbxlctty test- . ; , , . • .
. Silver by .EP Tbxl'c,lty test .;. . '. • . ,-. -.
'.'-.. . . . ^ • ' - '
Endrln (l'.2,3.4.io; 10-hexachlo'ro-l. J-epoxy,-, l,4.4a,5 ,6,7.8,8a-
octahydro-1, 4•endp.Vendo-5",8-diauethano naphthalene) by EP
Toxlclty test-' " ' '; -. •':• -. •'.: '••. •.-.•.! .'
' -' •- ''.-• :. - ' y-''\ V-;-.\"\ •'-?. ' ;,'- - '••'-•
'" ' • ,.'•..-';• :"'::<.;^v.--l ;•':': '•-' •,. • ;. ; ' '
n - «.-
o. o. i- *>
• o » -
o - n
c ? <•
O'
-O
G:D:
-------
-------
i :
r
.jl
'
D013
D015
D016
0017 ..
FOOl
F002
F003
|-r-
,;,:i>:.:
-«. •. •:
.v;:
F004
1
Llndane (l'.2l'31i.5|6'-hexachloroTCyclohexane. gamma isorcer)'by EP
•Toxiclty test. ''••..'. . " • "•'.'•'
,trichloro;2,2-bls'lp-i»ethoxy phenylI) ethane
Mechoxychlor (1.1.1,
by.EP:.Toxlcity:teit - -. ' . . • ••' ., • .
Toxaphene (CJI.C1.}. by EP Toxlclty-test . . • .
•2,4-D, ,<2,4'Dichloto'phenoxy acetic acid) by EP ToxicIty test '.'-
•'•••: . • ' ' ' ' ' • . '
. 2,4',5-TP Sllvtx (2,'4,5-Trlchlorophenoxyproplonlc acid), by EP
Toxlcley test '.-'.'•-..-, •, '. ;; ' . '••.• '•'.
The following spent halogenated solvents used In degreasing; • •/
tetraclilotoethylene.'trlchloroethyleheV methylene .chloride,
1,1,1-trlchlbroethanei carbon cetrachlorlde, -and chlorinated
fluorocarbons; all spent solvent Dlxtures/blends.used In' . •
degreasing containing,'.before use,,a total of 10 percent or more
(by volume) of one or nore of the above halogenated solvents or
those solvents listed in F002, F004 and F005; and still bottoms
•from'the recovery of these -spent'solvent mixtures. ••
The following spent halbgenated solvent*: tecrachloroethylene,
• aethylehe chloride, .trichloroethylene, 1.1,1-trichloro-l, ,2-2- -
trifluoroethane; o-dichlorobenzene,'trlchlorofluoromethane, and
lll.Z.-trichloroethane; 'all spent solvents mixtures/blends
.containing, before use, a total of 10 percent or'more- (by volume}
of one or nore'df the above halogenated solvents or those'listed
in FOOl, F004, or F005; and the spill bettoas from the.recovery '
.of these spent solvents' and spent solvent' oixtures'.
The. foilovihg spent nori-halogenated solvents: xvlene, acetone,
'ethyl acetate, ethyl benzene, ethyl ether, atthy1 isobutyl
keeone, n-butyl alcohol', cyciphexanone, and methanol;' all spent
solvent Elxtures/blends containing, before use, a total of 10
percent or Bore (by yoluae) of one or oore of the non-halogenated.
solvents listed above or those solvents' listed in FOOl, F002,
P004.and F005; and the still bottoms.fron-the recovery of.these
spent solvents and spent' solvent oixtures. •• •
.the folloving spent non-halogenaced solvents:, cresols ^and .. .
cresylic acid,- and nitrobenzene;'all'spent-solvent . ; .
oixtures/blends containing, before;use, a total of 10 percent or
nore (by volurie) of. the above non-halogenated solvents listed in
.FOOl, F002, and F005; and all. still bottoms from the recovery of
these spent solvents'and spent solvent mixtures. ' ' . ...
u.
'O
O
-------
-------
*
FQOS
•\ '
1
1
1
l'v:
V" ,
I.'-:"-
1
IV'
I>«*"
f*3.
t ; ; ;
i ••'.;.
i ..
§
w
' i- '
' f
F006
F007
F008
,F009
.F010
F012
'^ KO'OI
-K002
K003''.
K004
K005
'K006 .
The following non-halogenated solvents: toluene; methyl ethyl
'.ketone. carbon dlsulfide. .isobutanol, pyrldlne, benzene. 2- • ,
ethoxyethanol, and 2-nitropropane; .all spent solvent -
mixtures/blends containing, before-use, a total of 10 percent or
more (by volume) of one or more or.-the non-halogenated solvents.
listed above or those solvents listed In F001, F002 or F004; and'
still bottoms from the recovery of these spent solvents and -spent
solvent,mixtures. "• • . ' .
Uastewater treatment sludges'from electroplating operations
except froa the following processes: (1). sulfuric acid anodizing
of aluminum; (2) tin plating on carbon steel; (3) zinc plating
(segregated basis) on carbon steel; (4) aluminum, or zinc-'• ' •
' aluminum.plating on carbon steel; (6) chemical etching and
Billing of aluatnua. " .-'•-."' ' - '
Spent plating bath .solutions froa electroplating operations.
Plating bath sludges fron the bottom of'plating baths'from .
electroplating operations .where cyanides are used'in the process:
' • .' • ' - * ' ' ; ' ' '
Spent stripping and cleaning and bath solutions from • .
-electroplating operations where, cyanides" are used in the'process'.
Quenching bath sludge froa-oil baths from metal heat treating
operations where cyanides are used In the process. . '
Spent'cyanide solutions from salt bath.pot cleaning froa metal.
heat "treating operations.. .^ .-'.'.-. " '.
Quenching wastewater treatnent sludges from metal heat treating
.operations-where'cyanides are used In the process . > •
Bottom sediment.sludge fron the treatment of wastewater from/wood
preserving processes that use creosote and/or pentachlorophetiol.
Uastetfater'treatnent sludge from the production of chrome yellow
'and orange pigments.' ••' . . . .•_'..'.
Uastewater treatnent .sludge .from the production of nolybdate
•orange pigments.' -. -.-':'::.. •• '... •. '•/'••
' Uastewater treatment sludge fron.the production of zinc yellow
pigments. . - '..•''•• '
Uastewater treatment'sludge' from the production of chrome green
pigments. - . . ' ". '''•''• . •
Uastewater. treatment sludge from.the production of chrome oxide
green'pigments (anhydrous and hydrated). - • ' .
B -.<»•• S
• ? ^ o O
£". ~ -. «
CX •*' **
-;lfl';
8 •» £.-
to
o'
••o ••
-------
-------
'S3-
a n
1
1'1
1
t
•••; ." •'•'. ? .-'•--'
K007 ' -Wasteuater treatment 'sludge from the .production of iron blue'
....'• ' pigments. • . ''. , ; \ '.'''.".- '• • ' •. .
'-...' • . .• • "" • , •" ." ' •. '- '..'•'•. • '• . " ' • '
K008 . Oven residue .from the production of chrome oxide'green'pigments. '
K009 Distillation bottoss from the production of acetaldehyde- from . •
'. . eth'ylene. . , • ' ' ' ' ' • .' . ;
. KOIO Distillation side cuts from the production 'of acetaldehyde from
; ethylene. ,• -••... • •.
K011 : . Bottom stream fron .the'.wastevater stripper In the production of
•' ' • ' ac'rylonitrile. .-•'• ' •.'"•.-'••'' • • '"'
• '•' • ''••.- • '., ." ' • ' ...••*''• • . •'
K013 • • Bottom strean-frba the acetonltrile'colunn,in the.production of ' •
• • '"'•.' •'• acry.lonltrlie. . •' • '• " . , - _. ;.. " . • '•'.'"
K014 ' Bottoa from the ae'etonltrlle purification colunn in ^M . .- '
,'-'•"'•.' ' production'of acrylonltrlle. . ' - '•'• ' .',
K01S • Still bottoms froa the distlJlAtion of benzyl chloride.
KOI6 . ' Heavy ends or.distillation residues from the production of carbon •
'."." ,' . , tetrac'hlorlde; - • • ,"• •' . '" ' ' ' ,
K017 '-. Heavy ends (still-bottoms) from the purification'column in the...
..': ' production of'eplehlorohydrin. • . . . ." '•
•'KOig.- •. ' Heavy" ends, from fractionatlon in'ithyl. chloride'production.
!K019 ' ' Heavy, ends- from the •distillation of ethylene. dlchlc-rlde" in!.,,
. • 'ethylene dlchlorlde production. ; . , .',.".' •- .
; K02'0 .".; . Heavy ends from the distillation o£ vinyl chloride In vinyl
.' ; ., 'chloride Bononer production. ,'. ,• > •, ' '•...-
K021 . Aqueous.spent •antimony catalyst waste from fluororaethanes
.. . f '.' • production... '• . ' ' ' .' " .." . . -•.'•'• ._ •
K022 . • Distillation bottoa tars'from the production, of phenol/acetone
' • • ,from cumene. -' . • • ' ' .
•K023 • .Distillation lights ends from the production of phthalic .. ' .
. .' anhydride'from naphthalene. . '. ' . . • .
K024' " Distillation.bottom from the production of phthalic'anhydride •
from naphthalene. '• ; . - . ' •
K02S - plstillation'bottoms from the production of nltro-benzene by the
'•••i . nitration of'benzene. _-.-• . • • . \ '." ..'•".'• '
' CX CL M. M
• • 8'" - •
• c °-Z
•<•• s§»
g2a
... ~°2-
K)
-------
-------
I
I
K026
K027 .
. K028.
K029 .
K030
K031
K032
K033 .-'.
K034
K035
K036
K037
K038
. K039
K040
K041
K042
'K048
K049
, Stripping seill call's'fron.the prpdu'cclon of netliyl echyl . * ;•
pyrldlnes. -•'';' ... ' : .• '•• •. - •
'Centrifuge and'dLsclUatton: residue's from toluene dllsocyanace' . .
, production,1 • '. - • ',, . • ' .•
Spent'catalyst, froa the hydrochlorlnacor reactor :in the. :_ . ;..•
production of •lil.i^cr.ichlo roe thane.' __,".' '. .' '.''
. Uaste froo the production -streans stripper .In the production of
l.i.l-trtchloroethane'. • • ; . ,'. " : .'':""•'
-Column.bottoms or heavy ends from the combined production of
. • trlchloroethylene and perehloroethylene.
•By-products salts, generated in the production of MSKA and ;... . .— .
: -cacodyllc acid. •' ' / -.'"-• . .' • •'
•Vastewater treataent sludge .frob the production of chlordane.- •
Vastewater'and scrub water from the chlorlnatlon- of •. . .
• cyclopentadlene In the production o£ chlprdane. ' ' . . . .. "•
.Fllter-sollds fro« ihe filtration of hexachlorocyclopentadlene ;.tn ;,;
• ,thft production of ehlord«n«.> -' . . " : ' -
' Uastevater treatnent' sludges generated in the production of ,• .:'
creosote;' - •" '''.'. ' '\ ' • : '
Still bottoms fron toluene reclamation distlllacion 'In the .
.:. production of dtsulfoton. ' ', ' ' •;• '-.,-'•.".•
tfaste«ater treataienc sludges from the production of disulfoton. ;
Uastevater froa the washing and stripping of phorate production. ' .
Filter!cake fron,
-------
-------
ff-.
1
1
I
*» '
I
••
fi
K050 . Heat exchanger bundle cleaning sludge, from-the pecroleuni refining-
' ' '" . industry. ' ' .. • " ; . •' .'•'.•• --...-'
• • " .. - '•.'-' : 1- . . ' . . .• " -'' •. -'' ' '•
.'K051- '. API separator sludge from the petroleum refining industry.-.
.K052' '.' Tank bottoms (leaded) from'the petroleum refining Industry':
K071 ,' Brine-purifications audi. from.the mercury-cell process In
• " .- chlorine production-, .where separately prepurlfled brine is not
• ' used. . .. '• • , • -: r ' • -' . - . •
K073 • Chlorinated hydrocarbon wastes from the purification step of the-
• diaphragm cell process using graphite anodes in chlorine
production.'" . '...- • • •••'.' • ' . . • . • • •
K083.. ' Distillation bottoms fron aniline, production. '
K084 ••'• Uastewater treatment.sludges generated during the production of '
• • ''.'•• 'veterinary pharmaceutical*'from arsenic or-organs-arsenic
compounds. ••-'.'"'•, • ..; • • - ' • . '...'.'
.•'" °- "•.'." '. , ' ' " •
K085--' 'Distillation or. fractlonatiqn' column bottoms from the "production.
••-•„-. " •' '"• of chlorobenienes;.' • - - •"*••.. . • •' _.' • ' •' . .- ••''•_
K086 . Solvent washes and sludges, caustic.wastes and.sludges or water ..
' •' , ' washes and sludges froa cleaning tubs and equipment used in the .
... ' foruulatton of ink fron pigments, driers, soaps', and "stabilizers •
. containing chromium and lead. ': . . "' ' '•. •
KQ87 • • Decanter tank tar sludge from choking operations. • ' ' - .
K093 , . ' Distillation light end* from'the production .of 'p*>c^*iie-.•nhydtlde
'.- -• from orthoxylene. • ••'•"'• "' "- " .' '. > ..'•'•• " .
K094 '. Distillation bottoms from; the production of phthalic anhydride
' '. ,: . from orthoxylene. ., ' .,,".. • . :. . . . '" '•.. ....-'•'
K095 . . . , Distillation bottoms' from the production of 1,1.1-
trichloroethane. • , -' . i • . . '.. . '. ' ' .
K097 ' Vacuum stripper discharge from the chlordane chlorinator.
• • • production of chlordane. . . ••••,. ., . ' .
K098 . Untreated process wastewater-from' the production of tox'aphene.
'K099. Untreated'wastewater from the production of. 2,4-0. -.-..•
Klpl. Distillation tar .residues, from the'distillation, of aniline-based
.' "•"• •' 'compounds in the production of veterinary pharmaceutlcals from
arsenic or. organo-artentc compounds. ••' • ;. ..
.;'...6 .'•
'
3 ^ f- — -31
•» o 2 r o
' . a-"-n2ri
'0-
O
Q
to
'- hr|.
':• o
'.- O
-------
-------
K102 •
.K103
K104 ' ' •'
K105 .
"kio« '--.
: Kill - ...
Kii2. . :
- K113
KllA .'•'
. K1.15
K116
X721
X722
X723 .
X724. .
Residue from the use of activated for decolorizatlpn in the-. -. •
production of veterinary Pharmaceuticals from arsenic or organo-
. arsenic compounds. . . • ". ' • "-.''-*
Process residues from aniline extraction from the production of
aniline. '••.?'.. '. .' " ' . - ••- •' .
Combined vastevatec streams generated froa.nitrobenzene/aniline
production.' / ' - • . •' '.
Separated aqueous strean fron the reactor produce washing seep in
the production of chlorobenzenes., • ••' ,. ... -,
. • ' i; - •' - ^
Wastewater treatment: sludge' Eton .the mercury cell process In •' •
• chlorine production. " . •••• ' : • - - . ,
Product wash waters froo the production of dinitrotoluene via .
nitration of toluene. ._ • '•' " '•,.'. • '''"..'
Reaction by-product water from the drying of tolue'nedlaaine via •
hydrogenatlon of dlnitrocolueneL ,• •' . .' . _ : '.
. Condensed liquid light ends, fron purification of toluenedlaalne
:' -in the production of toluenediamine via hydrogenatiorv of
dinltrotoluene. .''.'. > ' ' ' ' -•' •''.-'
Viclnals from the .purification' of toluenedlanine in the, . '.• .
production of toluenediaalne.via hydrogenation-of dlnltrocoluene.
Heavy ends from the purification of toluenediaalne in the - ,'
production of .toluenediamine via hydrogenatlon of dlnitrotoluene.
..Organic condehsate from the solvent recovery column in" the •
" production of toluene dllsocyanate via phosgenatlon of ' ' ,
. toluenediaalne. ' • . ".. • .
-.Waste autouotlve crankcate and lubricating oils from automotive...
service and gasoline itations, truck terninala and garages. . -
•Waste oil and bottom sludge! generated from tank clean-outs from
.. residential /coemerclal fuel oil tanks.' '. ' . -' "
Ua'ste oil and bottom sludge generated by gasoline stations when
gasoline and oil. tanks are tested, cleaned, or replaced.
Waste petroleun oil-generated when1 tank trucks or other vehicles
or mobile vessels are cleaned, including,-but not Halted to;-'
oily ballast water froo.produce transport units of boats, barges;
ships or other vessels. ' • , . .
• : •
7 .
:J'5l •
ov *-••»•
it S o- ,
3X ^^ Z
5.o--S-:ro
—
2
»
--D.
2o-
' g
O •
o
to
>Tl
"O .'
o. ,
-------
-\
-------
H p*w*?»
I
1
\
K725
X72'6
X728
Oil spill cleanup residue which: (A) is contaminated beyond ...
saturation; or"(B> the generator fails .to demonstrate that, the ......
spill Baterlal was.not.one.of the listed hazardous waste.oils. •.
The following used and unused .waste oils; netal working oils; ;,.
turbine"lubricating oils; dlesel lubricating oils; and quenching. ,.
•oils. -' .•-•'. v .-''.• • . . ., ...,' , ....'.' •; ;:':; '
' BottoD sludge /generated from the processing, .blending, and _ : ,•
t.^eatntent of waste oil in waste oil-processlng faciUties. ,
= '•* ? * =
«.o x r o
*
-
o " —
e & 2
o
. O-.
o
Ui
cs
-------
-------
i-S
Izs
I
j
All "P" and "V" hazardous wastes listed in H.J.A.C. 7:26-8.15 except for the
waste specified in Condition 3(c) of Section II and the hazardous, waste listed.
below: • .• • -._' : • . ~. •' ••., .' •" . " ""'...- ;
POOS : ;. ' Anujonium'. picrate' • , • ,• • . '..,-'.•/ ' ' ' •' .-"
P041 . • • Phosphoric acid, dlechyl p-hitrpphenyl- ester , . ; •_'..-••
:P065 ./ . . Fuloinic acid, oercury (III) salt '".'.-'• ..' . '
P081 ' Nitroglycerine- ' "" '-'''• . ' . .
•P092 ... Phenylmercuiflc acetate. " ' .•'•'.- ." . v • '
P112 ; • • Tetranltrooe thane ' '"' . ' • 'V . . ;
UOSO , 1,2-benzphenanthlert* ."-. • • , ,• . • : • " .
• ' \'. '..' ' .• • •''• -• • ".': • ,• •... •".-".' - • : • ' ".-..•
; Non-listed, noh- character is tic waste streams classified as hazardous waste by
•• the generator or the Department because .of ''the presence, of hazardous -waste
constituents listed b«lo«: •.......-:.• .• ; ^ .
o- — 51
; = 8£5
o « ™
:S-*3
» S -
3s£
I
C103
C104
C105.
C10B
C109
C110
cm
C112
,C113
C115
CIJ6 !
C117
C118
C170
C128
C131
C132
C133
C135
C136 '
C138 .
C139
I
C141
C142
. C144'.
Cl45
C146
C147.
C148
C149
C150
. C151
C152
C156
C160
Acetonltrile • '• '.•.''.
Warfarin & .Salt ^. . '..•'
2-Acetylaninorluorene
Ac role in . ' .•".. -.. '.
Aerylaalde
; t
o
-O
to
.o
o
Af latoxins
''Aldrin - - '-,.'•••.•;;
•Allyl. alcohol '• •
4-Anihoblph*nyl'-'' ..'•'.•.",
Kitonycin C- .'••,..""' ;'.- ':-
• S-'(Aainoaethyl) 3-lsoxazolol
. 4-Aninopyridine '•..'•-
Aniline ;/,•'' - ' '• ' • .,'
Azaserine : .',•'; '.' .•
,;8enz'...(C) acrldine , .,. - '.•''
. Benz (A) anthracene •.'..- '
Benzene .'• . /, .. • ' .'
Benienethlol '. • v _' • ...' .
Behzidine ' : >''•• ~ ,-'
fienzo (B) fluoranthene • . /
Benzo (J) fluoranthene '
' Benzp (A)Xpyrene-- .' •. :
Benzotrichlorlde .'.',• '
Benzyl 'chloride ; : .•• ,
Bis <2 chloroethoy). aethane
.Bis (2-chloroethyl) .ether • ..:
Naphthylanine not tar d •. '• .-,.; '
Bis (2-chloroi»bpropyl) ether
Bis (chlorooethyl) ether .
Bls.(2-ettiylh'exyl) phthalate '•,
Broiaoacetone. •.•...'.'
Bromone thane '•..;' -;. • .. .. "• .-
4-Bromophenyl ehenyl ether ,.*•'•
.4,'6-Dinltro-0->ec-butyi phenol
- Carbon disulfide. ,-. . - -:-'. ,' . '
-------
-------
C162
C163
C164
C165
C166
C167-
• CI68 ••
CIS9
C170
. C172
•J-.
I
•.*. I
C175
C176
•C177."
C178-
• C179
, C180
' C181 .
C183 • .
- C185
'.C186-
C18S
C189
C191
: C195
C19S"
C199'
.C200'
C202
C203
• .C204,
C20S •
. C206
.C207
C208 '
C209 '
.C210
C211
C212.
C213
C214
.'C215 '
C216 .
C217.
" . IS .
C219
•C220 '
C221 <
• C222
,C223;.
C226.
: C227
"chlordane (A and' C Isoner'*) - .- " '
Chlorinated benzenes. K.O.S.
Chlorinated ethane, N.O.S.' .
' Chlorinated naphthalene. N.O.S.-
Chlorinated phenol, N.O.S. • ".'
Chlbfoacetaideyde ' . • - '
. Chlorpa'lkyl ethers, N.O'.S., •'
. PrChloroariilln«
Chlotobenzene ' • , • •-
• Chloroprene . • . . x- • •
••• P-Chlorp-ar;cresoV. . ''•'..-.
2-Chloroethyl vtriyl ether ;, • - ".
.Chloroform ., ... '..- ;
-.Chlorbmethahe -.-'.-..
Chloromethyl ite thy 1 ether .'' '' . •
-' .2-Chloron6n8phth4l«he .
'. '2-Chlor'ophenol'. - . '.-'•-.'-.
' l-(Ofchloropheny)- thiourea ••....
. -Chlorptoluene, B.O.S. •..-'-. ,
L-. Chrysene '. -" •'-, .. ' . '
, -Citrus red nov 2' -V1 "' '• /'
Creosote " . •-..'' j. • :'.•' ' '
Crotonaldehyde . ' /
. Cyanogen " • " ' • . , :
;2-Cyclohexyl-4.6-
-------
-------
*
C228 : ' Dichlbropropene.-S-O.S. .• -
;.C229 , 1,3-Dlchloroprcpene
C230' '.. • , Dleldrln "• . . '. ' -' : ; '
C234'. ' 1.2-'Diethylhydrazine ,, ' , .
:C237 Dlet'hyl phthaUte • . . .- ,.
C246, 7.i2-Dlmethylbenz (A) .anthracene
C247 •'•' 3,3-Dlnethylberizidlne ., -
' C248 • Dlraethycarbaaioyl -chloride ',
C249 'l.l-Dlnethylhydrazlne' . . ' •
C250 '•• 1,2-Dinechylhydrazine.
• C253 . •'•• - ••A.A-Dlaiechylphenechylaatn*
•C25b; ' . Dimethyl phthaU'ce- , •
'C256 Olraethyt .sulfate .'-.'"•
C2S7 DinUtoben2«n«,-H;o.S.
C258 ' ' 4,6-Dlnttro-O-cresol and iialcs
'•• C262 .Dl-ri-octyl phttialate .'• ' •
C263 •'.• 1.4-Dlbxane . ...
C266. ; •'. Di-h-propylhltrosaalne- ,'. . ,"
C269 . ' Endosulfan . . . , ,. ' ..
'•C270', Endrln'and'B«t»bolle«s ". . ,
C279 . . ' .•: Flupranchen« -'-,'.: '"•
. C281 "' 2-Fluoroacetanlde .. ••' . . • -.
. .C283 ,.-• ' Fonoaldehyde ' / .' - .
C284 Cycidylad«hyTJ
o;
O
-------
-------
C377 •; • : .' Phenol . : ,-. . '_.. t . . , ' ' ' .- .
, C385."• - 'Phthallc'acid ethers. N.O.S: .. • . • '..-'.
C386 Phthalic' anhydride - . . . . .'. ' '':.''''
C387 , Polychlorlnaced BlphenyU N.O.S.\
-------
-------
•"'firs. ,
fl
(8) Kinageoent of Non-Hazardous Wastes ' : ' ..'..'. . .;
, 1) The'permittee is Authorized to accept and incinerated the
following non-hazardous wastes:' " ' '..,•'..'.
• CX ft ». M
NJDEP :". • . '
Waste Number
X900
X905 • .
X910
1 -Description of Waste • .'• . ', .
. Non-hazardous-Liquid waste:,N.O.S.
•-. Kon-hazardous-Cas waste: N.p.S. .
•Non-Hazardous-Solid waste: N.O.S.
2}
I
I
1
.
All non-hazardous wastes listed in Condition 3 (B) 1 above shall-.
be managed as-hazardous wastes-in full compliance with N.J.A.C. ..
7:26-1 ft "seo.- and the terns of this »,pe rait /.except the non-' - -
' ' hazardous storage-areas authorized in'Condition 2 (A). 9,' Section
- - ' II-. -•, . • ; . v.' - •' •.;•'•.-. . . - " '. -• '.'-/
.3) All shipments o'f non-hazardous.wastes shall be accompanied by a
!r . completed hazardous', vast* manifest, using-the. NJDEP authorized '
• 'non-hazardous waste'numbers listed in Condition 3 (B) 1 above.
4) On-site storage of non-hazardous wastes shall be counted toward
' the permittee's authorized storage capacity. '"• . ' .
5) 'The pernittee shall hot accept or incinerate Class C explosives
as defined in 49 CFR 173.100. . " ."•':.
(C) ffastes • Accepted -for Transfer. Only '. • .',.'. : . •. •• ..
The permittee is. authorized to accept containers of the' following .'....
hazardous wastes in addition to the wastes listed In Condition 3. (A). . -;
'Section -II. for storage for periods of one hundred eighty (180) days or :'
-.. .''less, and subsequent transfer of., the containers to an authorized off- • •.
^- . .site hazardous waste facility: .-.-:. • ' " , ' . .' ..'•- . .
: • • ••' .' ' • ' •'' ' . : • ' I • "••'"'' "''. " •'
-P010 • ' Arsenic .'. ••'."'., ' • • : .
P011 ' . , Arsenic pentoxlde - ; ' ••'. .
' P012 '/ Arsenic trloxide . ' . . '- , :. '
» P015 .... Berylllua du«c . .; • • '
'• P087. . • OsaiuB oxide ' . -,.•.'.' ,'• ."-.' '" . : -••."•'"
P107 • Strontlun sulfide : .',"-". • . ' .••'..
-. PU3 ' •'-. Thalllc oxide ••*.'.' . '•'•. ' •'•-•' ,-' ,', ' .'
• - PUA " - Thalliua (I) selenide • • ' • . . : ..
P115 ; Thill iiia (I) sulfIda . ,' . '
P119 '• '. Vanadlc acid, lanimoniuai salt - ..",.,''
. • ' 'PI 20 " Vanadlua pentoxide • '. . . . .' •"' -••..'., \- '• .
P122 ..'Zinc'phosphide, (concentration greater.'than "101)' ' *•
. U032 -. ..-" Chroalc acid., calciua salt'-..'
• •. : 0134 ''.i .-..,. Hydrofluoric acid- .- '.'••'
,0135 . Hydrogen sulfide " . ' . . .
'
o
o
..' O.
I
nj
M-J
-------
-------
.0151 " •* Mercury .
1)189 . . Phosphorus suldde
U203 - . Safrole . ;
U204 . Selehious .acid -
U215 'Th'alliua (I) carbonate
U216" ' Thalliua (I> chloride
U217 Thaiiiua,(I) nitrate .
The pemittee shall"store these wastes only in their-original . •
.'containers and shall not ra'nove the wastes froa their original :.• .
containers unless a damaged container needs, to be over-packed. ,
;.The:peri»itteel shall not'accept wastes containing"polychlorinated .,
: biphenyls (PCBs) ac * concentration'greater than-fifty (50) parts per
- ailllon or greater, than any future concentration limit set by Federal
^Agencies or the DepartBent:. ;..•' '. . , .1 . ... ' ' .". \ . •
i
:t
1
i
» 6 2 S--O
g-^o-5 £
S»*!.-8
O. & M. M
:--.8 £*•-••
c 5"M
5 » " -
. 3 - a
1 So 2
:O
. 'O
, ,o
.';''. 'i :• **'•.-,* '.
-------
-------
. NOT ACCEPTABLE AT RESfNJ)
D003E
D006CB
0008LB '
D009HM
F019
FOZO :
F02L
F022
P092HM .
P092LM
P107 '-•
P112
P11J
P114
PU5
•P119 ;
P120
F024
• F02S
F026
F027 .
F028
K028 '-'-.
. KQ4J' -
K044
K045 . :
K046:
K047
'K060
K061HZ "•'.
K061LZ.
. K062 .
K069CS.. ,
K069KCS '
K071BK
' K07ILH
K096 ". ?
K099
KlpO. . '
K106HH
K106LM
; F009- ,
P010 . "
•pou
;?012
F015 '•"-
F019
P041
P056
P065HH
P065LH
P076
P078
P081
P087
t.
\CB - Cadniun Battery
, CS - Calcium Sulfate
E.-; Explosive . '
jKM - High Her'cury
' (>-16o6A8 for-K071)
HZ -. High Zinc (>15»)
LH - Lo« Kercury (<260 is
.. . (<16jogA8 for K071)
LZ'- Low Zinc (<15%) .
• NCS-. Non-Calclua-Sulfate
U032
U050
0134
U135
U151KH
OISILM
U189
U203 .
U204
U205
8
•o
o
U215
U216
U217
-------
-------
./X
C. - ' Conttltuent Lialt*tloai/. XwtlouB Ptt'd R»tV»
. 1. Do.you accept: bremlnatrj vact»> <«.g.'. »ctlv»Md.-*luiain« 'coni.mi.pj.ng
. cthylan*' dibroaid* 5-. phinolie polynart containing nmthyl broaid*)? Whit
li your ulxlstuB V.oniM limit (».g.'. pound* p*r houv or c»jtimua
• '.,• conctntratlp? in f««d)T .• .. • • ....
'.'•-'. t . • '' . • - " • •
•P • ',' . ; • 'Sot accepted at'this tine. --. • • .. j
.«• 2x5-0
ii'fls
:2. i Z»ra
" C- *«. **
,Ǥ"
Cont*ln*r typ«i thtt can 'b« R«c»iv»d .»t thi Facility. ••'••'•• •
• Do you aeitpt 11-quida, puicpablt cludgei, nonpumptbl* tludg«*. and to lid t
'.•-In.the'following form?- •• [. ..'••••.• ..'-.. . . '. .• •...'••
. ' Conttlrver TVp«
• , ..- Ub- P«eit " .
' Dnia» (tt)»C':sir««t)
''' •-. ' !' ' ,i
. Cubic1 Yard1 Box
Cubic Y«rd!-B»g
'"•'.' •. -ILoU.eff' . . '.-•
• ; " Duaptrailtr
' ', •. .-Tinker ]-....,' ';
. -, Fretture T*nV«r .'.
: (Cuccoj ;,
. •, : R»tlea'r I ' . ' . '•;
-."•• .' B«»e.' '' •'.-' ".'-.
Oeher (Specify)
: ,.'-•••..'.! •• ' - .
••'-"• .-" ' ' -."•/ ' '.
• :_ 'liquid',; .
• • t '-"
20, 30r .40
55 • - •-• .
. '• K<
•'».-'. :•
•• ••.- K' '•' ' . •
. •••' s '•'.-.'
: • y '
':..'' 'N-- ; V
'••••• K -'
•' ". v
'. "'-.'.' '. '' '
Punp*bl«
S*udge ....
' - Y .", , .
20, 30, 40,
..'55 '-. . •''
• • H". •'
:• .'-N: -' .
•?.-•:••'*•
'•" «'. . u
Y
' • N •'.
• r' N'" .• . '
•:.• -'..,.Y -• ' ':
auger sludge
' trucks
,'' '
. Nonpunpiblt ,
Sludga
Y ••• '.
.20, 30, 40, :
55 ' - -' ".'•'
•'• • N ••;••
. ' •' H ' '
. '.' ;•'»••'' -
': ... . N ' "'•'
. '•' 'N ..-.. .
• '• . . N ' ' '
" N .
' .-.'," ' -
solid :
. y.- '•'.
,20," 30, "40,
55
• tr "
-'•'' -N.. ',
-'. -K.' • '••
•N "' '
• •. 'N' ' e-
K; •
• H'' :• '
• >. •-. "
- . . - -
o
.0
to
^rj
"O
•O
Ui
ru
-------
-------
.9.
Do you accept d.brlif ?l«»i» . Indicate 'If you icctpc th« following' typ«j
'•of debris, «nd»nyllalc4Clons or conditions of 4cc«pctnc«.
. • -\' Hjmordoni Wislc Contaminated Debrit AccepUnce • ' ' •.'
TypeofD«bris • . ....
Common Goto Material* {».(., np, mop •
heads, bluKea, or ctotMag) . ' ". . ' .
PenomH Protection Equlpac&i (e.|, Tyvex •
tula) •'.'.,•'•-<•' . . ' . •'•'"'.
Piper or Cirtboirt MiterWi . ...
Filter CartriSges -...•'.
Wood Mtteriili ' ' .' ; '•/•••• : " •
Rubber Object! (e.g, drtt, bom) '' '. .
PVCHpe !'•• . •. ' • '.-'... -: '-;.
OQwrPiucfcDebcb -
Otm Ortrii . ';> .• ' ' . • " •'; .
Cerimle D«bril (e,g, MnJconducton) : .
Mtttl Otjecu (e,f., pip». vilvea, pump*, nnu
tadbolu) ! ... . : : .
Aibatot Mtterlili (e.j., Hilagk*, Imuiitloa)
Noa-SoU Geologic Matertal {&(., rods) ' •
Concrete Dtbrll .- . ',
Refcietory Brick . ', ' .V . .
Other.Brida
SU« ! - •'••'•'. •'-. I."'.--
Inuci Bitwrt«i' . . . ":' .:.
BttietyCuet . . .
Hftorontc Componesn (e.g., printed circuit
boirdi) : . . ' ' • .. .
Electrical . Wires, Switches, MC. . .- •'.
Accept
; NO*
(Y/N)
'IY-'-. •
Y '
'.\--:'--
Y .- '
« •':.- "
• ' \ • •
'•'-Y- "•
Y
• '• Y. ; :
'• Y • -
.-" Y- •• ' '
• Y'"' '
- .N • -
Y
Y
' -Y'
'Y'
'. Y -•
. -.Y'< . '•'
Y
... Y , • .
' Y . •> .
•PUn to Accept .
. -By June M ;
V (Y/N)..
'
.''"'• *' ,'
'. ''.-•'
' - . 1 " • '. ' ,'*•"'
. • ' '.
\ •'* . .
'-: ;•' •'•'••
r • -
- ' ... ' -.':
\J.< '--•'.*'' '
Acceptance •
• Condiiloiu
(e.g: pirticle size) .
' '•.-'-." '.
\ •
. ' '
metals limits, .
must be certain
size
no nickel, lead,
zinc
: . •• .
j-'.r..-,
..
to
.; *-«.
Vo
,. ,
/."• v"/.-/,"'-*; .j';?• ' -• :, ;'''.
-------
-------
.;,•„• -•• .•••vJr-,,v
'-<".•.':•.••' V'*.;'; Si'.-^'A^X"
r.
10. please explain'any debris acceptance condition! noted on the Table #9.
• ' , • • j- . .. '. •> . . • • .
It. Do you accept soils? If so, under what conditions or limitations? • • '.
.. • - Yes.' Kust be contalntrezed and within permit llmlcations.
i *.
III
ro
.
Q W t_
°
O-
a
V'o.
o
C3
ru
03
-------
-------
incinerator UnK Specific Capacity Sh«t
fr.Segrion F- ^bc
2." tfaitType; CamhlMtlon-'^r^.k'llil/itntiiii inaction incinerator.
ariot:(M BTU/Hour) .Vj 35/70
4; Status; Currently OiwratingXY/KJ;^.; ,PlMU»d tor ^^_^ JA_; ;-""•. . '
" If this unit is'currently not operating please indicate current physical,and/or regulatory
. status (e.g. preparing permit, permit submitted, performing .trial bums, unit under -. .,.
'.'.: ,.. construction)..'- • • .,: ' . -.'• •'._ •'- ,;,- .-•_/•• ; _ '..'';.' . / , .-. - _' •;'• •_.•
O
ro
o •
.'*•' ' /Average operatins hours per year accounting for scheduled and unscheduled "down time1',
: Confidential HOUTS/ Year ' .'•• j .'";'_'_ ' .. ,. . :
- " - ' V ' ' "•' "- '.. . ' ' ' ' '' -"• " -, ' .'." ' ' - ' " - ' '
, ; ;* Rotary reactor .type unit has been approved;in ihe site Part B and will be
' online in 1993. .Unit will handlelow BTU solids/sludges. . . .
'''
ru
-------
-------
••••,,-.--•• 10. ' -..••". . . • •
6. : Please describe'the waite feed mechanisms used to feed . RCRA-haiardoui wastes to this
•. unit/ •'..'•,.' .-• ' : •."•'.•' •. ' ' - ;.':' -.
- a a •-
• . ^ r? 5
».
o o ~_ to
a -a — 5?
• o «• _
O. 0. fl
. e £• *>
» a f
•
_
. 0. fl . ' .
e £• *>
.: ' -Liquids: _';• • _
' • • T-OX Into-
Aspirated fron tank fara.
Direct '.'burn .froa tanker.
Pumpablc Sludges:,
.: '. ••',- '' POP
' Nonpumpable Sludges:
Direct kiln via'conveyor and elevator.
Containerized Solids: . ,
. ' Direct kl-ln via convtvor and elevator.
Ni
'o- ••:/
MJ
-------
-------
... ' . .. . • . • ' , ' ' • .•••--' 11 '• • • .'
6.' , ?ulkSolids: , . f '• ,'' ;;,. • ''-.'_ . ..
• . - ••' .' ••' Currently not accepting bulk solids.'
-* .* z
o £ £• o
'
• s " -
2 a <*'
• C « ** -
•iJi .
7. Please indicate the RCRA hazardous waste volume bunied in this unit, it's penniued
eityi and practical capacity in the table below. -
Type of Waste
-• . :--: ..-' - „ . '>'''.
" ,•' '•-. '-• ••.. •'.
' (Uquids-;
Pumpable Sludges
' Nonpucipable .
Sludgei. .-; .
Containerized
"Solidi .; ,:••':
Bulk Solids ''•
:: ' T6tai ';.;.;'•
Amovnt burned
during first 6
months of 1991 •::••
.(Tons) .
. " • f '.
•• 26,457.000 :
' 2,532.000!
1 - ,;.._.-•
. ' '' * •" • . •
•; • ••• • .''" A'
sjoie^ooo
Not Accepted . * '
' 38,005,000
? • Maximum
Permitted Waste
. Capacity
(Tons/ Year) or
(Pounds/Hour) .
Pounds per Hour
Kiln 7,000
Loddby ,6.875
Afterburner 4,800
' MAXIMUM :
TOTAT ' ' '
CAPACITY 15,575
Maximum
Practical Waste,
Feed Capacity . ....
(Tons/Year) .or ;
(Pounds/Hour) . , .
• •' • •''",•
• Pounds per Hour .
Kiln \ 10,000
Loddby, .: 7,000
Afterburner 5 ,000
• .'.:.• '.••
TOTAL 22,000
7a.
Were the waste volumes received during the first 6 months of 1991 typical of what you
expect to receive over the. next year? If not, how do:you expect waste volumes to change
after the next 6 months? lyev?:(i.e. provide the percentage increase or decrease of each
waste form thftt youranticipate.)-,. : . - . .-. " .
Yes.r
•*'-.Non-puiBpable sludges' ?re accepted, .in containers, .but areVsolidified
. V 'and.'disposed'of .as. a containerized solid.-.-." '• '•'-•"'; 1 '•-' . •
K>
. O-
C3
-------
-------
' 12 • .•
V • '8. Please indicate the amount of RCRA hazardous waste contaminated debrisarid soil
'• ..-'i -.burned and yoW capacity to bum. .debris and soil by filling in the table below.' ' , .
Type of Waste ,
' .;:Debri*- : •'.' -
•. ". -. Soas;- ;•:.•• ,
Amount burped V
during Ent 6 . .
months of 1991
. (1991) '
. * •
776,926 •:.
.Maximum .'•'-
•' Permitted Waste
. Capacity, . . .
.(tons/ Year) or
; (Pounds/ Hour) .
•': .. --\ '•-"'.'. ,•".-';
Maximum ' -;
'.: Practical Waste' ,
Fe«j Capacity
.'(Tohs/ Year) or ":.
' (Pounds/Hour)- .
• ~ . u. . • ' ' • " -
Are soil volumes and capacities of soil accounted for.in:the Bulk Solid category of '. .
Table #7? Knbt, what categories do they faU under? Please provide percentages of. soil
'Under those categories.' '.. .. ' •./ •. '".'."-'•• •"•' ; ..''.•.•''-••'•'"
• No bulk solid, but-containerized solids.
.
<• ^ *" n
• • 5 :x X <>•
« o 2 S-
'a ** * 2 -
• .o
.-a
-j.' O.
- UJ
> 8b. Are dcbm volumes and capacitiej Eccoumed for in the Bulk Solid category of
'.••!' '. Table #7? If not, .what categories,do they fail under? Please provide.percentages of debris
' ,\ . under those categories.. ' '.-;"•' . .\. "•"/ '•'.. :- •• . • .
•'_• •'••'• v • • So bulk solid.'but containerized, solids. . . ' . ..
-------
-------
. •,"••'.••'•• .'!•'?':"n'\y C*
13
G.
1..
Future Capacity of Commercial Incinerators
Mtt* »MV.M*-J "'" ' ' T ' *-
.' resulting change in capacity, oywa;
of-a direct aspiration station; Construction_of ':.
i • . "• '
!3'iOOO drua.Warehouse; Construction of a rotary reactor and
ssociated feed systecs - solid/sludge thermal processing- .'
Lll add ^-5,000 tons !per vtar'of capacity); Construct i on:
a. tank faris;. Construct ion cf a. fail: spur. -•'. ' •
•«?'3-
••= x o S
". o 2 5"
• — "" n" a •
c: — u n
B J,^ n
„ •».„ „
(X 'Ck ^- «
• o " _
n a. n
- »
D
/-. J-O
• .-.o'
•: 2. -- • • WKot other regulatory changes are planned for this facility that will change it's'capacity.?
- Describe the change and the resulting change in capacity by\vaste:forni.. . '•",- .-
Uj
.r'.•"''• •••(. ~'' * • .';.j.-..-'-'-*/•-:
'"" •; ' .'' •"_'• * ' ,i!'.'" ,':• •'" ' ' •
-------
-------
•« o 2 =•
=• o
G.
Other F.cW to DetermiaeTutur. Capacity of CommerdatlnaneratorrCCtd,) .-;.
I ' V ^AreyouproWbitcd^ f*
: •'• '.uXi<-k cr'al^l? •" ' ' '• '•••. •' • • '' ' : ' •-. ' • • •- '
. 'which states?
4.
• o •> ~
2.^2
..«Sr
- O
. o. •
.- to-.
.. HTJ-. •
!-1-o'.-.
O
uj
-------
-------
V.
I .•• -
2'
^Facility Information
, - . • . • .,..• . .
Respondent Name and Title: fflr 'CnvK'i- Hur.n • '..hn.v\f^nn.rn\n] fl\"r>r-V:T~
. .... ... . . . ...-• ;.:-•. -0-. ; .: •• . --• •." J •
Company: '.' •' RoH\/V> -t-nm/jn'n-'rrtt '.\ 'Sg. f. O;tC6
Kibne Humber:
Ql6 -
Fax Number: :' .l
Name of Caller:' " • Ti*e.»-vlbV
Date of Call:_;
Time of Call:_
Hunber'of units currently burning RCRA. hazardous waste at this..."
facility: »-l.rg -. • 'LA/ji*.-( ''•,-.
Wi-v" ' O n f \r. I \. be. 'ir. •)•*'.% fjf«>.' . .' •- '
'•'. '- ;'":i5:;.c
• •!." ,"'.••:-',"••.'','*•%'••'.'',!.•'•*
.•'/,: •';''>,:r,v4:&::'
••. • - •'• :'-••;-•«!?•• i. v.
4 ••'•' '.'.-'-t ?".-,' '•'> ::
-a
i sf s
S-^ ?.Rz
•» o 2 tr o
BlS
ft Q. »-. «•
:• o * ,-
"if 5
K)
>TJ
O
.O-
OJ
ca
.". ' '"'j '•. : , . ° • •'
, • ;•% ••- >."'-.• ._ '• ..."
-------
-------
. • . Facility. Information' (ctd.) - ' ,• '' , ••• J,
What-is. the current overall utilization of•this facility's incineration
capacity, for following physical. forms>f waste?;,. . •';•'••
.Liquids1-." ' " ' '• ' '•"« , •...".. . . ,..',.
Pumpable Sludges *• • , ' ' ' "
Honpiimpable Sludges • ' ._^* . •< . • *'...': . ' ' .
Bulk'Solids • . _.••'. Ji.'' :- •'.'.• ••.-'"'.. " ';.-'• .
Containerized Solids •• ' » . • .' ; '' •']'.•', '.'• ' • - -•
Total . . .^»-
.
•» o 2 so
-" ^
••;«.r
'"-:O--'
•-'O- :
UJ
-— J
CTi
-------
-------
•'••:*«;
B..
. 1J
. .-.,•• .Penatt Issues •..•'• .
.•Have you received a final- RCRA Part B.permit? If-not; vhen'db you
expect to receive-a RCRA Pare B. permit? . • ,. • 'V-. -.'.',• ': : -
(AQ,<-
.What other perniit(s) are required (e.g. NFDES, Air Emission)? By when? .
What -is', the current status. of these permit (s) 7 .• '.._-' •} ,, '.''.'.
,- '•' Vgf -».it
: vc..'1 Air-
i. . r*J,i>r '
. r*J,fi>r 'g-t-.'. • • I ^ h . i <• •
' ••' ' ' •'' •'
. .1.0.0,^." -
~ r - 9 ».--.•
•'. cS-2
n
.0
to
'-**>
,0.
O
Uj
-------
-------
"8.
3;
'•"•> - Perntt Issues (ctd.) '.. . • . '-,, ; . ,
What RCRA wastes ace currently, pennicced? -If more convenient, .please
fax list. Are -all units authorised far sane RCRA codes? if'not,- please
•specify RCRA codes, accepted for each unit. ....';.-.''•_• . ,
Ail
4. Are you adding any;vaste codes to your permit? Which ones? -When do you.
expect approvals?' • •' • . • '.' ' •'.... • ..'•"••••:
I rtv -^V\i f^f. JIT''
5. , What types of wastes do you'generally reject? . .'.•"
- i-w» iO/:ni' &m nl> n<- . • V p"< <'.>/
, . . T^ . .- HJ...^^ . I ^— V i •
' '
C.\t
'SMSS
a. & u. M
>' -• O- ** Ui •
"«:<».
S5ff
,. H.
O
•d
GO
-------
-------
C.
.' . Constituent Limitations/ Haxiaum "Feed Rates '..
Do you accept bromlnated wastes (e.g. .activated alvuiina containing.
echylerie dibromide or .phenolic polymers .containing methyl bromide)? What
is your. riaxioun bronine limit (e.g., pounds' per hour or, maximum ' •.
•.concentration. in feed)? ' . " ' * - ..
{jrcf flffH. f»v fft.Lt i
. tv^t'.,
D. : Container typts that can.be Received-at the .Facility ' i
1. . Do-you accept liquids, .purapable sludges, nonpunpable sludges, and solids
, in the following'fonts?' . ; • ' ' ., - . • •
. Container Type
Lab Pack
• -Druas (What Sizes?) ,. ''
5«afl> -^-apjfc
' Cubic Yard Box
Cubic Yard Bag .
Roll-off
. ' Dump trailer' '•' .
, ' Tanker - -".
Pressure Tanker.
'(Cusco) ;. •''.'
/Railcar' ' ;":....
Barge. ' - .-,:•_
;'• Other (Specify)
•••". • •' ;'- '•'.. ..-.."'
s t ,
Liquid
,.- ••''•••
.'.'«/ -::' '•
. ';'.. '••; • . "..
1 • . :••'•• •-.
' ' i ? * '
'"' , '\'-' •• 7''
••' ^r
: ^;'' -
:• ^ •
. ' \' ••'
".•'.- •.''•••.
' Funpable ' .
: Sludge
;>,^ -•
..'•-• ^
'•• i
:•..''*' ' '
^' : ., '
'" • . .'- ' .
..:. :' -.".' • •.-
, ^
Nonpumpable
• ' Sludge •
- L^""- '•'
'. l>"
.. -^ "'
•'.-' *r
" -ix ". '•"
• .' , •
' ••'-.-' ' '
*
Solid ; .
••.„/;.,••
' . ^/- ''
v^ '.
• " -'
t.>-
IX1
•; -
fir
-y|f!
£x *.°-*
•« o 2« o.
'3-"*a'
K ^
-------
-------
£••!*-!•-V-1
•S*-S :
. .-
«< o 2 jr o
'
Do you,accept debris? '.Please indicate if you accept'the following types
• • '. of debris, and.any -liaitacions' or conditions of acceptance. -.! : • ,. '•'
•...'..• : ..Hazardous Waste Contaminated Detail Acceptance .••'/• • • ." .
Type.of. Debris "'"..•• ' '_•'•'•
Common Cloth Materials (e.g, rags, mop
heads, blankets, or clothing) , ' - ' .
Personal Protection Equipment (e-g-. TVvex
suits) .'••••• '.-,,' •..:'-.•
Paper or Cardboard Materials . •
Filter Cartridges . • .._."." '• .
Wood Materials ... . .-,..- > : , '.
Rubber' Objects (e.g., tires, hoses) i .
pvcptpe .; • , " "
Other Plastic Debris
Glass Debris ; '. /..:. •.'.•'.. . ,.'
Ceramic Debris (t.g., semiconductors) - ',
Metal Objects {e.g.. pipes, valves, ptunps, nuts
and bolts) --••'.. • .
Asbestos Materials (tg.. shingles, insulation)
Non-Soil Geologic Material (tg^ rocks)
Concrete Debris • ' . . '.•:'".
Refractory Brick . -
Other Bricks ' •
Slag ".'. ' .' -..- ;' •' -
.Intact Batteries . . ' . . , .
Battery Cases "-. : . '
Electronic Components (tg., printed circuit
boards); ; . ' •' '
Electrical Wires; Switches, 'etc . .
Accept .
Now •
..(Y/N)
'^..
•. •'/'•..
••.ix_ -.,
• ..«x- •"
• . i
'•••• ^ . •' •
.-\jf •
: - i
• v -
y '
\s .
.;•
\S .
V
• -H"-.-; ;
, <^
\ •'.
y -•-'•
V '
y- .-
w
w
:V
\S : '
• \
Plan to Accept
• .'• By June 94-'
. (Y/N) - -
v oV,::;./;
. ^ ' • •
. ••- . I • • . . •
• .^ '-./•-:'
V •"/ >.'
';";-V-'-'. -..;••
•: --rV '-' :,:' l
. "/••.-'•••-
-V: r:> '.-:.
-.'.-Y-'-.l-1- ••:;
• . y:--: .,:.- '-
•::&••"•.:
• ' :': rJ •• - ;.'• •
•••*: --^
; . . w/ •.• • •'!
: Y-. • •
y
. - y. ••:•/•.'••
N
•'•" : N, •."•'••
•',',V.:;. -.• -
Y'-.'; •'.
:' Acceptance • . •
• Conditions '•
• (e.g. particle size)
joc iv^--'
"10 1 "- <•-•'
'•: - '&,>
. ...'-• •
•. .- ' .-• - .-;;- •
.•''".'••-
-*,
•••.•-,•''. • ' •'
• •- •'.' ' -•..'.• ''
•'." •-• -'" •'.'-' • '
:...--'V.v
,N
;a-
vo;
CJ
].•
-------
-------
• rv:v^r'r'X'"v'r.*r>^s—^'':-^7:;.;'V/-'r: '... ••'•*'
'10. : Please explain any debris acceptance conditions noted on the Table #9. •'•'..,-'.•-;
- '' A i' dda-.\
II; Do you accept soils^ If so, under.what cpniJitions or. limitations? :.
PnV V)> 1 m ' '<^,r-,ctv\ff:t-A o>4( P>>.i k.^
1 W \ff
. T
jr «•<•
TK.
i * ~ • -'• > ' ., .•"-•-•'
~i' i', • VC>^K -. ' !'•"«;»*«} .»„. i- ,-| ojc
\) ... MI1.'J , '[' ' . - •...!'. • !,-" :'..-• '. .
.<*i, -..I\y\ '-Al-1 fti,K' cC-1'1 Cjo'ta jSuvrfrv. <0 '-t^ViitV.' bo
'FU--.J-f*<- frrdt ^.jt-o/«. f(p6r,t~ir- . ' .
..'."" " • ' --."••.•- - '.• ' . -'
ts 5 <» *• s •
• a -<» 2
n
§
:.';• VQ
o
-.c
-------
-------
I.
•.: F.
Incinerator Unit Specific Capacity Sheet
Unit #:_{each question in Section F will be addressed for each
unit! .. . • -..''••'• :...: ' •
UriitType:__
' / 5HVt< 1. .:'••• .".••' .- Ljbbvj L.r.y,9b. .
e: . Kpi a rm Vc-.'ln....'. / ,juTth p... ;,j A f Ir>'feur >\r
-100
- tHermal Rating:(M BTU/ Hour). '•'... -115 Q. |H faTU / r-r •- Mt^^.i.^ to
,Status: Currently' Operating (YOT . iX' ; Planned for _^_j__ 19; _ . '•'.'.
If this kiln is ciirrehtly not operating, .please indicate current physical /arid/or regulatory
status ;(e.g. preparing permit, permit submitted, performing trial burns, kiln under • • - '
construction). . • . ' . ' '..•''• '':'~ '• ' • • -•'••' •'•• ,.'''-.'. ,-
O
a.
U)
Average operatmg hours per year accounting for scheduled and.unscheduled "down time"
Hours/Tear . - . ; : . ' .
ry
-------
-------
r:
10.
-i ''6, Pleaise describe the waste feed mechanisms used to feed .RCRA hazardous wastes to this
unit. . ' ...'... .. • • •
Liquids: . ; -. ' •' . /
Pumpable Sludges:^ •'•
Co-ret ftf-
Nonpumpable Sludges: '.-..'•'
Containerized Solids: ' .
Gu
r>
/AfA «T\ ht
III
»» o a 5-0
• O ** MM
» § ?
S
'
—J
.-c:
-------
-------
11
6. ': BulkSoUds:,
7. Please indicate the RCRA hazardous waste volume burned in this .unit, it's permitted
'• • • capacity, and practical capacity in the .table, below. '-. fair
;... J
•••j>'J '
Type of Waste
.';• Liquids
'Pumpable Sludges
'• Nonpumpable •
.. ; Sludges
. ' 'Containerized •'
!' • Solids • ' .
Bulk Solids
. ' Total ''.-.
' Amount burned •
during first 6
months of 1991 .
frbns). •-;
iQ-VsO T-3HS
.":.• '" /'. '.V- ';''
- --,;fe:
".;;•••.:•-•••)••;.:•
'fip.nc ' '
6 JSOO ^'j"'^
-. Maximum •. •
Permitted Waste'
.Capacity.
(Tons/ Year) or
(Pounds/Hour)'. •
:- • W/r\
V: '.•-.' fJ/A ..
-.;••• ^ :' .;'.
•„"•'«/ A;:.. .'-\\
• w//\'"
'..:63to6ib»^-r.
. Maximum ;.. .
Practical, Waste -
Feed Capacity •
(Tons/Year) or.
(Pounds/Hour) . :
JIW Jb/h?f*? •
• ' '.'.'•'•' ;.-.•' , -•" .'••'';- •tv.'.tooo':iV/t"- ^^ • • '•"'•-., •••.'^
7a. Were the waste volumes: received during the first 6 months of 1991 typical of what you ...
. expect to receive over the next year? If not, how do you expect waste volumes to change
after .th'e.next:6 months? 1 year? (i.e. provide the percentage increase or decrease of each ':
waste form that you anticipate.) ,\ . .- ' • , . . <: -•....- • . • ;. •"
.
» «-•<» 2
« .**••*„ tn
a a .... H c
•, o .<* «..
• -2 fr'S: .
• -. g-g."
-•§ -a -.•
• "So 2' ,
'•n--:--:
, to
'CD'-
! O.
-------
-------
: • i
':-*
8.- Please indicate the amount of RCRA hazardous waste contaminated debris and soil
^ burned and your capacity to bum debris and soij by filling in the table below.
Type of Waste
Debris '
Soiis .
Amount burped
• • during first 6
months of 1991
• :(1991) ;V .
tj. GjMO Tjn5
eit. ?>HO ToTrf
;'' .. Maximum
Permitted Waste -•
• Capacity. •
(Tons/ Year) or,
• '(Pounds/ Hour) .
-,M,/A
."<• fj-th
Maximum1
Practical Waste" .;.
Feed Capacity
(Tons/ Year) or-.;
(Pounds/Hour) ;
..M//V . .
:t&(k. '• '.. "•:
8a; Are soil volumes and capacities of soil accounted fo£ in the Bulk Solid category of.
Table #7? If not; what categories do they fall under? Please provide percentages of soil
-'under those categories: ' ...... •' .'. ;•;...';...;.-; '' • ,
• ;iOA •• ! ^n4 ««..>- • 3 O W>tlgJ LC
,, p • T^ ~~~. ~ ' . . ... - ~ '
: :8b. Are debris volumes and.capacities accounted for in the Bulk Solid .category of .
,..',• ': Table #7?, if not, what categories do they fail under? Please provide percentages of debris
• ' tinder-those categories'. .-' •'.••.:• ' -._:'.- .'".-.' . - . : •• y ';. ' . .'.. ,
' '' '
.
; g - •
• S - 2.
O
U)
*H
-£:
un-
-------
-------
F.'- -
Incinerator Unit Specific Capacity Sheet
1. Onit #;jeach Question in Section F will tie addressed for each • .'• .. . ' .
.•''.' -unit1-:' ' . ' . - -• • • =•"•.'• - '• •• • • ': ' • ', '' '•
"., Unit Type:
fc'i < >-. / .F('i»:. <> .'
:..-••••„•: :- v .
otftrv^ Kcc c-tj^ / fa {ff feu/«;
<: so
3. .' Thermal Rating:(M BTU/ Hour) . :' /.'Q I?>-.-.6t>O';OOO feTU- /' Hour HR. 3b ft\«,
: '. 'V. ':• .''-..-.' -' :^ • :• ''-:-. . ': -•'. .:• •' M':w
*. ' ; Stiatus:. Currently^Operating (Y/W) ^_kl Planned'for ,19. ... , •'''
• ''-•. '.j. ' -' "7 •••'-'•' •-••.- . .; • _ •'.-.. . ,', •"• ••.:•;'"
, '',.-'••'. If this kiln is currently'not operating; please indicate current physical and/or regulatory
...statiis'(e.g/preparing perinit, permit siibriStted, perfpnning trial burns, kiln under • •
' •-.'; _construction): '.- ' v • • •. " ' ' . ' , .'_'''_' ' '•'"' ,• ' - "•;•
. • 5. -: ' Average •
'
rating hours per year accounting for scheduled and unscheduled "down time"
''Hours/ Year .' ' ' '•.'',•' ' :" '- '; '•"•' 'X. ' -. "•••
• ' " '
-," • , * ' - <•
':"•**; .1 .'
SB-
" •*
" S - » 0
<» ** 5» .. . to
o. a — »
'
--
n
O
.0
-------
-------
•• •'.' -.- ••*,• ,'-. •
V .- '•• *••' •••' . • ••>
Please describe the waste feed mechanisms used to feed RCRA hazardous wastes to this
"unit. "•.: '•,'•.• .'. ' ..".''.":." -' • . V '•
•» O X
.
n a •» „ .
. CL a »~ »•
-
Liquids: . _ • '••' .-..
Purapable Sludges:
' . .'- Covit.
•' ' Containerized Solids:
Pu,
rurnY?'--.
Nonpumpablc Sludges: .
or ••
F/t. ,A\e.ea fieri
O ,
-.. O-.,.;
to
-------
-------
11
,6. ' Bulk Solids:
• 7. ' • Please indicate the-RCRA hazardous waste volume.burned in this unit, it's permitted
capacity, and practical capacity-in the.-table-bclow.1 ' ppr-5ypHt5
months of 1991
. {Tons).' ,, ,
-*-•," ••"'"..
U.^OO MW
"•;••• '-.'•'••'-Ss • :•'
.,;::::.;fo,u
-; '•'-'••"/ '
• ':•'.•" -.A-'- ••
3HODDT^s-
• •'Maximum ' .- •
Permitted Waste
-Capacity;.,, •
(Tons/ Year) or
(Pounds/Hour)' . •
• .-,Vv*t /.-'
• -JW/A ' :V-
• •" w/A-.", '•*•'
N/A
, jv//^ . : .
3a>o6o'V«,
: Maximum
Practical Waste'
Feed Capacity .'.-• :'
(Tons/Year) or
(PoundsyHpur) .(
:.: '-1I,9L06%
'• (^c*ooll
•• .••:|:'/.1 ^
.-.-•J •..'••' ,•:
"3 * jOoo 1 1^/ 1. s~
•• / A*
•, • -"; • •' . :••"' '•*'•• ' tooo '*/»»••. AF • • . '- • -: ' : ; "':
7a. ' Were the waste volumes received during the first .6 months of 1991 typical of what you . . '*;
expect to receive over the next year? If not, how do you expect waste volumes to change
. . after the next 6 months? 1 year? (i.e; provide the, percentage increase or decrease of each .'
waste form that you anticipate.) , , , .- .' • ...,.'
" -^V
ill!!.
o
:.d
to
-hrl
-o
O:
U)
-------
-------
-'-S. •
;.--.' ..:,"-: v -.-' . :.:*"; • ;/12 • ' ' -"-- , .' ;--'' ;. ':'
.8.' ^ -Please indicate the amount of RCRA hazardous waste contaminated debris and soil
' burne'd and your capacity to bum1 debris and spir by filling in'the table below;
Type of Waste
• •- '
/ •
' ' . • • -
"., '"Debris ; •
. 'Soils : .
Amount burned
. during first 6 :'.
•" months of 1991 •
•i . (1991) .
'. -iiTo.y T3Y&-
5,5^5 To.n5.'
. Maximum
Permitted Waste
Capacity
'(Tons/ Year) or
.•(Pounds/ Hour)
: XI i A •-'
, ' Miiximuin.
'Practical Waste.
• Feed Capacity
• (Tons/ Year) of
•(Pounds/Hour) .
': K~I /ia- •
Are soil volumes and capacities of soil accounted for in the Bulk Solid category of
Table'- #7? .-If not, what categorits dp. they, fall' under? Please provide percentages of soil .
under those categories. :..-.•'• • . „;.'•.• . " •-.'•',.'•-.'.
• M&*> QS^ of a" salhCJL'vJS jt"ol'. Sjl.at'': Ib CtCfet iV ' .
•'•' '• .- v.'^"^'',.^..':
. —
P. O. _ w
• o « -
O
O.
K)
,
•o
u>
^-J
-------
-------
ffjgttXyff
G. ./•::
13-
Future Capacity of Commercial Incinerators .
What other physical changes (e.g., changes to feed systems, storage area) are planned for
this facility that will change it's capacity by July, 1994? Describe the change and'the
resulting change in capacity by^wastc'form (Lei the' increase or decrease by waste form.)
resulting change in capacity by
-Crvivilrmr ¥'• SVAitie.JL'fi
•.. • i t •)-.--
•^^ri.rp> •$*
ffC. V^j f 'V%<- t, . «. . >-'n..-»• U>ill
o
5t-U-rAi •
• r-.;.
What other regulatory changes are planned for this facility that will change it's capacity.?
Describe the* change-and the resulting change in capacity by waste form.
G-tJ
. KcorW
rO"' 6c
~
c^
^*l
U-i
CD
-------
-------
g'¥MX'>
G. . .Other Factors to Determine Future Capacity of Commercial Incinerators (Ctd.) .•'
.3. Are you prohibited from receiving any RCRA hazardous wastes from any. states? If so,
whichstates? >.- : .. ' - ' • .
HO'
•'.4. , Are you limited to receiving a maximum amount of .RCRA hazardous waste from any
-'states? If so, which states and what is maximum amount? . . •• ' /• '.• .
tfitt .'
& _.
-flil
0.
•:«•=
.0-
-------
-------
.'X • '"'r. 2. :'''. - -'
Facility .Infbrmation_
'' r
1. . Respondent Hame" and -Title: -feri JL CVvo
frto>-kc(''»' '
'Company:'
ruiCO '
Phone SUnbw :
Fax krnber:
f^ ' "3 H3 '
Haac of Caller:
.' Date, of Call:
all: uuv ^
'
ilae of CallV . :' - ' ' VrBO : AVV\ •' - l^ '^5 P>V\
2. . Number of units currently burning RCRA hazardous waste at this • , . ;
Number_of units expected to shubdcjm by July 1994: . O
Additional units expected to "coin on tine by. July .1994: O'.l
Total number of .units expected to burn RCRA hazardous waste's 'at,this at '
the facility by July .199ft: .> -1 : . . . . .
Has this .facility'undergone any physical or'regulatory changes'in; the .
, past 2 years that have changed .it's capacity? If so, briefly explain. . " ',.
OUbfRll 't =
'.'-' ''':i'~';'^:'':. i'- ''",.
0 2 j
0 jo
a. » «•
•
-------
-------
.A..•'•..'•' ' ...'•'• > Facility Information(ctd:) . J , ..
4. tfhat is the current overall utilization of this facility's incineration
capacity, for following physical forms of va'sce? -''"""
.Liquids . '... .'•. ;
Punpable Sludges • •:._
Nonpunpable Sludges ___
.Bulk" Solids. . _
Contalnerired Solids. ____
-Total - -. ' -••'•._!
!L
: .':;.;.' i. •>_•;-. .••• . • -. -.
' . '- -i' >"' ' '..•'.-. ."' '•
'-• :.'• "I'-'A .••'•-••,-'.-.'
' f-J^ifi
.' 0.0. u.»', •
§.
•o;v
.o-
t^
*»j
un
Cu
f .-..
-------
-------
' '" ,4
Permit Issues
'Have1' you received a final RCRA Part B pernic? If not. when do you
expect to receive "a 'RCRA Part B. permit? ' . . < • •'.' •
d . Cgckftl fraH fS \n Auri'v*^
.
)/lCJi;c-Vifl& 3ri *»^
'
What other perait(s) are required (e!g. KPDES," Air Eoisslon)?, • By when?.
What is the current stacus of -..these pernit(s}7 •. ' . • '• .
TaXIC
*
o. a ^ wi
• '-
. 3 ~ a
. 5°2.
"O
to
O-
o
- U>.
C3
"--*•
en.
-c
-------
-------
» P.
S.
•"'_ '. '' , .' . • Permit Issue* (ctd.) . ';•• ...' • . •
What RCRA vastes are currently, permitted? If more convenient', please- ...
'fax list:'-.Are all'.units authorized for same RCRA codes?. If not, .please
specify RCRA codes accepted for each unit. • .• '•. .
- "Of-tW viftC'c/vJLcs' :DOl^>'DD>-r3 •••••' ,
o a. >- » •
'&. Are you adding, any waste 'codes to !your permit? .Which ones? When do you
expect approvals? '-. .'.•:'• -. ' . , _ '. .
gxo&iictA.., October. AWl . ::
. - ,. .v KUt: -••
.^ : JLcpp^
What Cypea of wasces do you generally reject?
A^ -H\W -Kme ''
f-frt^-l
:° "'•'
bO '
.TI. .
".O '-:
o- '
OJ •'.,.
-------
-------
(' ""'' " r*» •.. '• >" ;.. /* '• ''^ !* "'* * * "''"i 1* HJ'II'"*
. • •' -' : •/ '-v" • '*. :': •; ' --.-' '"'.. .. . •'.
Constituent Limitations/ Maxlmun Feed Rates
a .B- "*• n •
"a
•. 1.
'Do you: accept .brbminared wastes'<•.s-; activated.alumina containing .. •
'ethylene' dibronide pt phenolic polymers containing'methyl bromide)?. What'
is your maximum -bromine limit (e.g.. pounds per hour 'or. maximum'
concentration--iii .feed)? . • . • ' ," • i . :"- •
' ' Container types that can be Received;at 'the Facility .-. '•„
•Do you accept liquids, puapable sludges', nonpumpable sludges, and solids'
• in the following forms?; . ' ••• •:' , . - . . '• . ' . . .
.. Container Type ••
".. Lab Pack .
Drums. (What Sizes?) .,
• 'Cubic Yard Box .
Cubic Yard Bag
. . . Roll-off , • .
\ . Dunptraller
• Tanker • •
. Pressure Tanker . .
(Cusco) '
: '. Railcar . .
. ..." Barge'
Other (Specify)-
. PMlt-Vs-. .
rv.^u *jCrtx.- <-ofjt>
Liquid '
'. • -*f '~i.
' ,^.''
•• •• •, • .;
':- ..&"..'••
•• :- :??•*:
• ': \^
- P., .
Puapable
-,; Sludge •
-,,-.:.&'..' ••;
'••'•^••••\
. ' •:
,- ,. ' ^
•-/•'•^- -•
v-.'^."."-
' ' * - - .
\. ' • ' i
' . '
- ^
Ac.tjs-5^.
Nonpumpable'
Sludge . .•
••- v^. : ...
.:• ' V^'-V '
•-• •;"... ..
•'
"' ;.- "•
IS
O
o
to
.^
O
O
ch
i.'"
en
-------
-------
9. .
Do you accept debris?. Please Indicate if you accept the following types'
o£ debris, and any-limitation*-or conditions of acceptance. •' •
">.'•• •• ' Hanrdous. Waste Contaminated Debris Acceptance. . . "
Type of Debris ' . • • '• . ,
t -
Common Cloth Materials (tj, rags, mop
beads, blankets, or dotninj) ' .'•.'.
.Personal Protection Equipmeat (e.g.. Tyvot •
suits) .'.' • .-" ... :.• .
Paper or Cardboard Materials .
Filler Cartridges . • " : .
Wood Materials '
Rubber Objects (e-g., tires, boscs)
PVCPipc .. '- r"
Ctker Plastic Debris , • ->
Glass Debris •' ' A . . : . •
Ceramic Debris (eg., seraiconduaon) •
Metal Objects (e.£, pipes, vahes,'.puinps. nuts .
and bolts) .
Asbestos MateriaJs (e.^ s&ikjlcs. insulatiOB) .
Non-Soil Geologic Material («.£, rocks) •
Concrete Debris •. . . .'••..;•
Refractory Brick: ' ."••.-.•'
Other Bricks
iSlag--,,'.. •'-.-. . - -.. . '. ,' . -
Intact Batteries • ! • • . ......-' •-"..
Battery Cases . • '• .'• ; . , '
Electronic Components (e-g, printed circuit •
boards) '. .'-.,.'••-:
Elecincal Wires, Switches, etc.
Accept
. Now.
(Y/N)
•;V'.:/.
-v-V-
Y V
:.Y-.-
•vY,
Y '
Y
•Y.
r ••
. N .,
Y :
N/ -
: v-
V
\f
y -.
••-.-•r ,
M
M .'•
rO
<&.
Plan to Accept
•: By June 94
.(Y/N).
'.-••*'••• ":
-,-v-i:-
. Y •;• ;
'.:',V.'- ,,
. \ .v -. :
.. Y.:
,%Y' .-.
. V
'•••Y •:
N
*•*•''.:'•••
, :N. •.,..
• Y •'.-.. '
'::Y. •-•.-.
- V .,: ,'
r
:^
r>j •
.-. . fj
M
. rvJ ,
Acceptance
• 'Conditions '
(e.g. panicle size)
$ce hevt- .'
• Pailc
•''".• ' ' • •
,•
: •-"-'
m
a. a. «* M •
UJ.
+J.
U"V
-—j
-------
-------
tS-f\VU
' *~ ~
"
oVK' rhu-)t be
; •
y^a. (AJi"tK hcw< Un-.'t
on
xf fef:- . rgg
o
•d
to
O
o
ea
-------
-------
. .. . .
F. . Incinerator llhll Specific Capacity Sheet
'1. Unit #:_[each question in Section p will t>e addressed for each
- uniil f.RI ' •••.' • . . ' • ' . •'
2. • Unit Type: CS£.; . •
3.
4.
5.
thennal Rating:(M BTU/ How)
CRT
Status:-Currently Operating (Y/>0 Planned for _. 19
If this loin is currently not operating, please indicate current physical and/or regulatory:
status (e.g. preparing permit, permit submitted, performing trial bums, kiln under
construction). :•';'-.' . •' ' - . . '•.'.' -:; ' •
Average operating hours per year accounting'for scheduled-and unscheduled "down time"
CRT Hours/Year . - ; .. .
Ill
,*?:
•» o 2 r-o.
» § "
2 •*•&•
'
O
-''.'. o
•.:. o-
ca
•^.-j
th
to.
-------
-------
-f,
• •-" : ' '*. ••,'.' •' • 10 .
. 6. Please describe the waste feed mechanisms used to feed RCRA hazardous wastes to this
.unit.
Liquids:
C6>I
Pumpable Sludges: '.
CRT:
Nonpumpable Sludges:
CfeL
'', •.... .•' .' • Containerized Solids: •
CfeT
p. a - ST
* S"*1 -
go."
•'§"••
'
. o..:
v to
."" o •
on
i.-
-------
-------
11
6. Bulk Solids: ,
2 ' o
•z-ss.
7. • Please indicate the RCRA hazardous waste volume burned in this unit, it's .permitted
• '•• capacity, and practical capacity in the table.below.. C8l * ...
.".- Type of Waste
- Liquids. . .
PumpabJe Sludges
Nonpumpable
1 Sludges
'Containerized
.:' Solids
Bulk Solids
. Total -
Amount burned .
during first 6
months of 1991
(Tons)1 ,
>.'.'-.
.. .
" • r
' ' "' " •''•''
. Maximum
Permitted .Waste
1 Capacity .
(Tons/. Year) or
(Pounds/Hour)
r- ** ' " •
' > ' ' '' '
^ t
'•' '•'••''..:••
• ' ': '..'•'..•'•
Maxinium
Practjca] Waste . •
• Feed Capacity
(tons/Year) or
(Pounds/Hour)
'" - '< " .-
- ' •• •
7a.
.to
.-.Tj
O
'O
OJ
Were the waste volumes received during the first 6 months of 1991 typical of what you
expect to receive over the next year? If not, how do you'expect waste volumes to change
after the next 6 months? 1 year? (i.e. provide the percentage increase or decrease of each
waste form that you anticipate.) " ^ . ' ' < ^
C.G.X : ••'••'-••" •;••". •• ' -••• . ••• . ' -;
i—!
cn
-------
-------
12
8.. , Please indicate the.,amount of RCRA hazardous waste: contaminated debris and soil -
. burned and your capacity' to burrLdebris and'soil by filling in the table below. C5IT
Sa. Are soil volumes and capacities of soil, accounted for in the Bulk Solid category of '
'„•' • Table #7? -If not, what categories do they.fall under? Please provide percentages of soil..
•• under.those categories. ".- •"' ..'.." - . ' • '. '" .•-"' •
:••" ;'; car •,. '••' .".-• • .'•'••: •-.•:- •••.- •-. -: . ;'•-'•' .... \.
••i
Type of Waste.
Debris', ".'
V- :. - •
• : , -. . Soils . •'. .
. 'Amount burned •'
during first 6
months. of 1991 "-.
(1991)-. :
• .. •
'.Maximum • ..
Permitted Waste
-. . ;Capacity •
. .' (Tons/ Year) or
(Pounds/ Hour)
' • • ' .' '• •' ./
. -Maximum • .
' .Practical Waste ;
Feed Capacity. _
(Ton's/ Year). or',
(Pounds/Hour) -
• , •-;"
X'
'.':•- ., . ' _• .-. ' ' •
.)•'-''•• ' . -• .'
''''..• • 'f • '•"
." • ••"'. ="• .' ' ..
..-. o.2 s-.o
'3 - ^ * «
' O n S __ ft]
ao.«!l :
-a:-
to
O
'
8b. Are debris volumes and capacities accounted for in the Btilk Solid category of .: .:
• ' Table #7? If not, >vhat categories do they fall under? Please provide percentages of debris
under those categories. •••'.' . . ; . '' • : . ' . .'••••'•'.
QPt
-------
-------
riff
- ^
13
G.
1.
.Future Capacity of Commercial Incinerators '
.What other physical changes (e.g., changes to feed systems, storage area) are planned for
this facility that wfll. change it's capacity by July, 1994? Describe ,the change and the
resulting change in capacity by waste form (i.e. the increase,or decrease by .waste form.)
What other regulatory changes are planned for this facility that wfll change it's capacity.?
•Describe the change and the,resulting-change in capacity by waste form.. • ,
, O
: -O'
K)
-o'
o
C3
- j ;;.
psl-
Uj;'
;( '
-------
-------
'-. ". V G.
-\.
. Other Factors to Determine Fqture Capacity of Commercial Incinerators (Ctd.)
Are you prohibited from receiving any RCRA hazardous wastes from any states? If so, •
which states? ; . ••,'',.•'. . . .;. '' ' .• " .'.., • • •'. : -.•-•
Are you limited to receiving a maximum amount of RCRA hazardous waste from any'
states? If so, which states and ttiiat is maximum amount? . .' '..•- • . : ..
' ' ''' '''
".o.-5-0
-- o
^- -Q-
:. to
en
-------
-------
'.'•'•'•' . : "' '•*• " ': ". '• I'
**
3
<1
ti
; '•'" ,' '.;_ - •' ' V .„ • • .;• •; ,2..-V'-;
- •. • • ' '-. F»eUley: In
- ' . _ - - • ' '•' .,'/•' '.•''
Respondent Hane and Title:. - AV Trr/.-lto P:-
' ' • - " - '
Conpany:
-
Nane-of Caller:
Date of.Call: -'. .' - '•
.Tine of Call: .
of units ^currently Wrnthg RCRA; hazardous waste »t this
facility:'.. J,: • '••'•;.'." '" • '..?. ' J',,•;.' "' .-.. •..•'. . '• •' •
Nunber of units, expected to '* $- '':•>
•.'', - -\ ',* i -
• y >vO>"T* ", , ^
o. — T
o "• —
.8 -off
.-a:
u
to
o
•O"
OJ
m
wj
CTi
U^
-------
-------
A. ; ,. ••' •;•". .•- Facility Information (ctd.)
UhaC is tha 'current overall uctllzation of this facility's incineration
' capacity, for following physical 'forma of waste? '
_
Pumpable Sludges • _
Nonpunpable Sludges .
, Bulk Solids : ;~
Containerized'Solids
'Total- ' "• : • . ' ":~
-. I
. I.
I
"• o 2 JO
' o ** .5" ^ W
K)
•'W
O'
O
U)
-^
tn
-------
-------
T
B'.
1.
2.
Permit Issues
Have you received 'a final RCRA Pace B permit? .If not. when do you
expect to receive a R.CRA Part B permit?, . •' .'
What other pernlt(s) are"required (e.g. NPDES, Air Emission}?. By uhen?
Wlutt 1* the current status of these pemlt(s)? > . '•. . ; .' : .
ex rr Pe.fr; ,-V -
srl^s
ES|
o.
O
•o
MJ:!
C.TV
—J
• : !
-------
-------
8.'
, 3.
•• .' '•' . •• . ' Fermic Issues _.'- ' .' . . .-...-
Wh*t:RCRA wastes ire currently permitted? . If more Convenient, please '
.fax Use.- 'Are all units, authorized for same RCRA codes? -If. not, please
specify. RCRA code's accepted fot each unit. . '" •./•''
'Ml iQTc
Q>
CXT
?tvg<
J
Are,you adding any vast* codes to your permit? Which ones? When do you
expect approvals? • . •-•' ..'"-••'••...--': •'=•"•': •"•• '-• • '
5. "- What types of wastes do you 'generally-reject? ;'••" •• ' . .^ • .;'_. . . "
.o.
••-'O'
K>
v O
•x-.o-
. U):
tf
T~J
Ore
cd
-------
-------
c.
. 6
Constituent limitations/ Maximum Feed Rates
1. Do you accept broainated. vastes («;g.. activated aluaina containing .
ethylehe dibromlde or phenolic polymers containing nethy1 bromide)? .What
. '.Is your naxiaua bronine liait (e.g.. pounds' per hour or oaximum
. '• concentration in feed)? . • ••...' • • • -. ';' . .
D.
'Container'types that'csn be Received at the Facility
.1. '• Do you accept liquids, ptrapabld tludges, nonpumpable'sludges,• and solids
•: ' .in:th« following forms? CbT .'',:'. "'.-:' --; ."•'",..".•''. '.•' /' " •'' "-: "'"'
.; Container. Type.
'••' '•. • ' 'lib -''Pack'-'- '.
• Druni (What Sizes?)
.( .-- • .'•' '> • . • •
'•• '' Cubic Yard Box ..
'.. .Cubic Yard Bag
. Roll-off.
, Dunptrailer '
... ' ' Tanker:'.' • - '
Pressure tanker:-. .
. . " ^ V (Cusco)'
if . Rallcar
Barge : /.
Other (Specify)
'1 ... .-': .' .-", •--"'.
Uquid- r
•'.'.'• ; ' .
. " .'-:.-••'
-, -. •";'
":" •' •
-/ '.. " '
-. • . • •', ,
-. . '• ; '• -. '•
Punpable.
Sludge
• '-. ' ' • •
' ' '• ".' .
' • ' • ;"": : ' .'
• . • '• ;C- . ' '
^.
; ^ .••
Nonpuapable .
. ' Sludge .
""''•/ •- ••••
-"- ••'•' •• :'. . '
•:/•.":••>-,'"" :
•- •• "• , - ' ' ' .' '
• ."• "., .J • •
'•V ' •' ' '
.'' '-. '. " '-.'''
'"'.-.•-•.•'-'•-/ ': '
•-,-.'•
Solid
"
"'. .' '! '
-'- i
: • ". '.' .
.',.'•
• ••- .,'l1~\'., •
' ".' ' •'*.!' ( : * :'' „'•''' , '
' .'. '' '"'«:-".,'* v
.:
' * "7
8&f
' 1-2. '.''
, "* f>
•. *' . t • '
a
^^
r**&'
cn
US
-------
-------
. DCN PH2A012 ' • • . , x
COMMENTER :Beazer East '- . ' . .
RESPONDER JLABIOSA '"' - ' ',
SUBJECT . WOOD11 • ; . " . - ' . • ."''."
SUBJNUiM 012 '-..'"' ' •".:• ' . -.'•'•
COMMENT Specifically, EPA discusses the Penta Task-Force's and the" , • ,
American Wood Preserving Institute's concerns that promulgation . "
of concentration limits for dioxin/furan hazardous constituents ..
in Hazardous Waste F032 may discourage commercial incineration
facilities from treating this waste. 61 Fed. Reg. 21420. For the
record,'Beazer also submitted comments which were critical of -
EPA's proposal to establish dioxin/furan constituent
concentration limits as LDRs for F032. It was and continues to
' •. be Beazer's belief that selection of incineration as the Best . .
Demonstrated Available Technology ("BDAT") will bring cleanups . '
'.of wood treating sites to a halt due to a lack of capacity at , .
off-site incineration facilities, negative community reaction ' . " . :
for ori-site incineration facilities and skyrocketing treatment <
costs., Beazer recommended that EPA omit the dioxin/furan • . •' .
constituents from the LDR constituents of concern for Hazardous
Waste No. F032. _Beazer cited several reasons for not including . , .
dioxin/furan as part of the F032 LDRs, to wit: (1) EPA's failure
to scientifically demonstrate and support the risk from low , ...-'•'
level exposure to dioxin/furans; (2) the problematic nature of ' ..
the analytical method used for detecting dioxin/furans; and (3) '
the non-availability of incineration capacity for treatment of. ' -
large quantities of soil .and debris which may contain F032.
RESPONSE . - . '
EPA is not persuaded by the commenter's arguments that the regulation of ;
D/F in F032 is not necessary or that such proposal would delay treatment of F032. EPA.
points out that these constitents are toxic to the human health and the environment and that D/F
constituents also supported the listing of F032 as a hazardous waste under Subtitle C of
RCRA. (See Background Document for the Listing of Wood Treater Wastes (F032, F034, and
F035)) As the commenter may be aware, EPA's existing guidance documents on the
management of contaminated media at wood preserving sites also identify D/F constituents as
RCRA constituents to be addressed during the design of clean up treatment options and within
the scope of Record of Decisions. Further, EPA existing soil guidance documents for wood
preserving sites also identify incineration and thermal desorption as treatment options capable
of meeting clean up levels and treatment standards under the LDRs. (See Presumptive '
Remedies for Soils, Sediments, and Sludges at Wood Treater Sites (Directive 9200.5-162, also'
published under NTIS: PB-95-963410); Technology Selection Guide for, Wood Treater Sites
(EPA 540-F-93-020 or Pub^9360:0-46FS); arid Contaminants and Remedial Options at Wood
••''','•."'' 1281 ' • ' . ......
-------
Preserving Sites.(EPA/600/R-92/182).) ,. -. .'.-•''
Finally, the majority of commenters were more supportive of EPA's proposal
to co-promulgate both treatment limits and an alternative compliance treatment standard of
combustion, "GMBST". for the regulation of D/F in F032, Like EPA, these commenters felt
that such approach can create more available capacity, based on empirical experience with
F024 wastes.' . - .
1282
-------
DCN ' PH2A012 , , . - : • .
COMMENTER Beazer ... '
RESPONDED JLABIOSA ' . : ' '••
SUBJECT WOODli .•: .• ' '• . . .. ' • ' ' • « -
SUBJNUM 012 ' • • ' ' • . ."' . ' • / - , '
COMMENT - In our comments to the proposed Phase' IV nileniaking, we
discussed the unavailability of any commercial incinerator which
, '.. could meet the proposed 1-part per billion LDR'concentration '.."•••
• ' standard for dioxin/furan, aside from the Aptus facility in •
v Coffeyville, Kansas. The instant proposal would allow '
incineration or combustion of the wastes by facilities with '
destruction removal efficiencies (".DRE") of 99.99% rather than
,'the-99.9999% ORE required for "dioxin-listed" wastes. 40 C.F.R. • •
266.104(a)(3). Theoretically, this alternative LDR treatment , '
. standard should increase the availability of incineration and .
combustion facilities-to manage F032 wastes. •; . - :
RESPONSE « • . '•-/.'>
1 i , ' \ . ' V ."
; It appears that the commenter was concerned that since the BOAT model
supporting numerical limits for D/F constituents was based on six 9's Destruction and Removal
Efficiency (DRE) incinerators, facilities seeking compliance with the numerical limits in ' '
RCRA incinerators, cement kilns, or other industrial furnaces achieving a four 9's DRE were
likely to fail the proposed UTS limits. It also appears from EPA's'discussions in the preamble ;
and the BOAT Background Document for FOS2, F034, and F035 that at least one facility was
permitted to treat D/F containing wastes as difficult to treat as F032. This led the commenter
to believe that EPA Was considering limiting the combustion of F032 to a six 9's DRE-RCRA
combustion device. EPA is clarifying, therefore, that in today's rule EPA is not amending •,
264.343 (a) (2) or 266.104 (a) (3) to compel the combustion of F032 or F024 in a six 9's
Destruction and Removal Efficiency combustion device. Nor has EPA proposed that the
combustion of F032 or F024 is only conducted in a six 9's or a four 9's DRE - RCRA
combustion device. , '
; . . - •
It should be noted that although the BOAT combustion technologies supporting
the development of UTS limits for D/F regulated in nonwastewater forms of F032 and F024
met a RCRA incineration performance of six 9's DRE performance, the modeled compliance
treatment alternative of "CMBST" was based on,the performance a four 9's DRE - RCRA , -
264vSubpartO, rotary kiln incinerator combusting F024. Data from the F024 incineration
study shows that a well designed and well operated four 9's DRE incinerator can also meet the; '
.proposed limits of 1 ppb for nonwastewater forms'of F024. . ' .
Based on this information, EPA believes that RCRA Omnibus permit
authorities can be used under 40 CFR 264, Subpart O and 40 CFR 266 to ensure .that the
combustion of F032
-------
devices and thus, 'minimizing the release or generation of D/F during combustion .. This
adopted approach may be superseded by,the outcome of the-proposed MACT limits for D/F.
arising from combustion devices schedule for promulgation in the April 1998. .
Facilities seeking the combustion of F032,in an incinerator regulated under a
40 CFR 265, Siibpart O do not qualify for a '"CMBST" treatment standard, unless they,are'abie
to make a demonstration of equivalent performance to a permitted incinerator or to a BIF.
F032 residues arising from all other ;40 CFR 265 units must meet the applicable UTS
numerical limits for each regulated D/F constituent as a prerequisite to land disposal. . ; .
EPA believes that promulgation of this revised suboption 3, fully addresses
the concerns of the commenters, fully addresses the capacity concerns raised by the
commenters, and that this suboption is protective of the human health and .the environment.
- 1284
-------
.DCN PH2A013 . - - - ' . '
COMMENTER Georgia Department of Natural Resources,.EPD
RESPONDER JLABIOSA ; '• '
SUBJECT WOOD11 . . .' ; '
SUBJNUM 013 . , . . . • ' \ ' .
COMMENT The Georgia Department.of Natural Resources, Environmental
Protection Division (EPD) has reviewed the above notice of data
. availability and would like-to take this opportunity to provide , .
additional comments oh the issue of treatment capacity for soils .
contaminated with F032 wastes. Specifically, the State of
Georgia may be unique in the nation for having a very !.,
substantial amount of this material on hand that will likely (
place a strain on the Capacity of virtually any. treatment
. methodology that is ultimately selected for F032-wastes. . ,
RESPONSE . . . . -
. , >/ • ... '".-.-'
EPA is addressing the commenter's concerns in today's rule.
1285
-------
• DCN " PH2A021 • . • .
COMMENTER J. H. Baxter . • •
RESPONDER JLABIOSA - ,
.SUBJECT WOOD11 .. .
SUBJNUM 021 . . ' -
COMMENT In its comments on the August 1995 proposal. J.'H. Baxter made
. clear that the cost of incineration and lack of available
.x capacity would impose a real, unwarranted hardship on many ;
members of the wood preserving industry. Suboption 1 appears to
address this problem by .expanding the number of facilities . .
available to treat F032 wastes. In the very limited time made
available to comment on this proposal, J.H. Baxter has tried to ,
ascertain the impact it would have if implemented. We
understand from sources in the waste disposal industry that
implementation of suboption 1 should result in adequate
capacity. Further, J.H. Baxter has been informed that it should
. not cause the dramatic price increase for disposal-of F032 that
will occur if the original proposal is implemented. J.H. Baxter
has not been able to obtain any meaningful information on the
impact of suboptions 2 and 3. Therefore, J.H. Baxter remains
' very concerned that either of these are unlikely-to yield the
same benefits. They both will result in a smaller universe of .
approved combustion facilities and hi higher prices. Therefore, .
J.H. Baxter urges EPA to adopt suboption.1, not suboptions 2 or
3 when the final Phase IV rule is issued. If EPA is interested :
in proceeding with suboptions 2 or 3, it, along with OMB,.must -
carefully assess the benefits and burdens of these proposals, as
well as the impact on the regulated community. To obtain
meaningful public input, EPA also should provide additional time
for comment.
RESPONSE ' • ' • . •'.'..
Economic considerations have no bearing in the development of treatment
standards under the LDR. EPA is relying solely on treatment management alternatives
allowed under Section 3004(m) of HSWA, which EPA believes enable the reduction of
short- and long-term risks associated with the disposal of Dioxin and. Furan (D/F) constituents
in F032 wastes. , , .
EPA is promulgating treatment standards that set numerical limits for the
regulation of Dioxin and Furan (D/F) hazardous constituents in F032. In response to
comments from the Penta Task Force and the American Wood Preserving Institute, the.EPA
has also proposed and is promulgating in today's rule an alternative compliance treatment
. ' 1286 ' .
-------
standard-that sets combustion ("CMBST") as a treatment method for D/F constituents in' •
F032. . •' ; • •,. _- . '•'•-.'...•' ••'...
EPA has promulgated, however, a revised "CMBST" compliance alternative
which limits the-availability of the "CMBST" to those combustion devices in compliance .
with applicable combustion standards in the 40 CFR 264 , Subpart O, or 266. F032 wastes'
combusted in combustion devices operating under 266 or 264 do not have to monitor the
•concentrations of D/F left behind in combustion residues. However, the facilities must meet
UTS numerical limits applicable to each organic and metal constituent regulated "in FQ32 .as a'
. prerequisite to land disposal. '
It should be emphasized that facilities seeking the combustion of F032 in an incinerator
regulated under a 40 CFR 265.Subpart O do not qualify fora "CMBST" treatment standard.!
unless they are able to make a demonstration of equivalent performance to a permitted
incinerator or to a BIF. F032 residues arising from all other 40,CFR 265 units must meet the
applicable UTS numerical limits for each regulated D/F constituent as a prerequisite to land
disposal. x •
- . EPA's authority to:,prescribe treatment limits ormethods of treatment under-
the LDR are set under section:3004 (m) of HSWA. Under such'HSWA provisions, EPA is .
directed to set treatment standards that would reduce short-, and long-term threats to the human
health and the environment. EPA believes that Omnibus permit authorities under RCRA and
other available environmental federal/state laws can be used-to support the establishment of "
3004(m) treatment standards and thus, to prescribed appropriate technological controls on
treatment methods prescribed for these wastes. EPA has promulgated specific performance
standards for the operation of incinerators combusting certain acutely toxic wastes that contain
D/F constituents (see 40 CFR 264.343 (a) (2) and 50 FR 2005, January. 14, 1985). EPA has .
promulgated similar kinds of technology treatment standards for hazardous wastes regulated
under §268.42 and hazardous debris §268.46./These specific treatment standards under
§§268.42 and 268.46 prescribe treatment methods and EPA has relied on permit authority,
• federal/state air emission standards, or promulgated operational technology performance
requirements to ensure that the technology treatment methods are protective of the human
health and the environment. . ' •. _ .
' 1287
-------
1288
-------
DCN - PH2A003 - ' . . , '
CQMMEiNTER Penta Task Force ' ,
RESPONDER . JLABIQSA - . ' "
SUBJECT. - WOOD12 .'-..- : -'•' "
SUBJNUM ,003 ' ' .'...' •
COMMENT The Penta Task Force is comprised of the two U.S. manufacturers
- of penta - Vulcan Chemicals, a division of Vulcan Materials.
Company, and KMG-Bernuth. Inc. Penta is the chlorophenolic - .
chemical used in wood preserving processes that generate F032
waste. Accordingly, the Penta Task Force is profoundly affected
by the Agency's August, 1995 Phase IV LDR proposal and the May ,
. 10, ,1995 Notice of Data Availability. . . / , .
RESPONSE . . " . !• '
EPA is addressing the commenter's concerns in today's final rule.
1289
-------
DCN ' PH2A009
COMMENTER Dow Chemical Company . •
•RESPONDER JLABIQSA
SUBJECT WOOD 12' : "
SUBJNUM 009 . ' ' -
COMMENT The Dow Chemical Company (Dow) appreciates this opportunity to
comment oh this important Notice of Data Availability and
respectfully submits these comments on the notice published in
the May 10, 1996 Federal Register pages 21,418 - 21,422. Dow is
only submitting comments on item 2 Treatment Standards for .Wood
Preserving Waste F032, and Potentially, F024.
RESPONSE
EPA is addressing the commenter's concerns in today's final rule.
1290
-------
1291
-------
DCN PH2A010 '. ' ' . '
COMMENTER EOF . - :
RESPONDER JLABIOSA -
SUBJECT, WOOD12,
SUBJN.UM .010 ' ; ' .--..'•
COMMENT These comments are submitted to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) in response to the Agency's notice'of
data availability (NODA) related to the land disposal
restrictions (LDR) program under the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA's NQDA was published in the Federal .
Register at 61 FR 21418 (May, 10, 1996). Description of the .
Commenter EDF is a national non-profit environmental advocacy
• , organization with more than 300,000 members dedicated to the
protection of human health and the environment by inter alia,
eliminating unnecessary exposure to hazardous substances,
including hazardous wastes'. EDF members'live, wprk, and recreate
in areas immediately affected by the; improper management of .
hazardous and industrial wastes, including the hazardous wastes
addressed in this NOD A.. EDF participates extensively in RCRA
implementation and oversight, including activities in the
regulatory, legislative, and judicial contexts. The NQDA \
Generally Though published under the title "Notice of Data
Availability", the current notice largely requests comment on
issues for which the Agency lacks data, has never proposed
regulatory language, and/or never articulated a rationale or
methodology for reaching a particular position. In many cases,
the only material on which EPA seeks comment is the position of
other commented
RESPONSE - .
EPA believes that it clearly presented certain issues for supplemental comment
in a legitimate manner. The issue is whether there should be an alternative means of
compliance for the CDD/CDF standards. EPA proposed an alternative whereby monitoring
was unnecessary if treatment was conducted in certain types of devices. The basis for the .
alternative standard was that if the device is combusting efficiently and demonstrates
compliance with all other organic standards through monitoring, compliance with CDD
standards would also be demonstrated. EPA has adopted essentially this approach in the final *
rule, the alternative being available only to combustion devices subject to at-the stack controls
which show efficient combustion conditions (these are BIFs and permitted incinerators, all of
whom would be subject to continuous CO or HC standards; and in some cases, to at-the-stack •
CDD/CDF controls, plus interim status incinerators able to demonstrate equivalent
performance.) EPA believes that this level of combustion is a valid alternative way of
-' " '
, ' ' " 1292 . - ' ' .
-------
expressing BOAT for the CDDs in the wood preserving wastes.
•r
1293
-------
DCN PH2A010 -.-•••'
COMMENTER EDF ' ...--.
RESPONDER JLabiosa ' - ' 'f
SUBJECT WOOD12 . -
SUBJNUM 010 . - , ' ' '
.1 p .
COMMENT Conclusion EPA should abandon issues raised in the NODA not
ripe for consideration in this rulemaking, and promulgate the
1 necessary treatment standards as.expeditiously as possible .
•••> "•" reflecting the comments expressed herein. .
RESPONSE I1.'-'. ' ' • • . ' • -. • '
EPA believes that the revised suboption 3 allowing .the combustion of F032
and F024 in combustion devices regulated under 40 CFR 264 Subpart O, and 40 CFR 266
Subpart H, fully addresses EDF concerns that these wastes are combusted in a manner that will
achieve the numerical CDD standard. The Agency's experience with F024 wastes, which can
achieve these same standards (as established initially in the June 1989 Second Third
rulemaking), demonstrates that combustion properly conducted can treat CDDs to this level:
See also information in the BDAT Background Document for these wood preserving wastes.
EPA believes it is warranted to adopt this alternative standard, because a) the standard is
equally effective at minimizing threats posed by land disposal of wood preserving wastes; and -
p) the alternative creates desirable flexibility' and is likely to provide more available treatment
capacity for these wastes, thus further minimizing threats by increasing the likelihood that
treatment will occur promptly. EPA's past experience with F024 wastes again supports these
conclusions. • - -. -
i ' . ' • • •
EPA has Deferred the proposed M ACT standard for "the combustion of F032' and F024
to the MACT rule, scheduled forpromulgatioh in April 1998. EPA believes that adoption of .
such proposed treatment standard for F024 and F032 may impose regulatory burden on the
combustion industry while technical issues on the proposed air emission for D/F-MACT limit
are still being deliberated. EPA believes that the existing CO/HC standards, plus at-the-stack
controls on D/F, are adequate to assure that the treatment standard for D/F will be met without
analysis. EPA's experience with F024 wastes in 1989 lends credence to commefiters' concerns
that there will be insufficient capacity without this compliance alternative. EPA therefore has
decided to adopt it.
1294
-------
1295
-------
DCN PH2A011 .
COMMENTER', Vinyl'institute - ' .
RESPONDER JLabiosa . •" -.-.''•
SUBJECT . WO.OD12 • -
SUBJNUM Oil , , - -
COMMENT On behalf of our client, the Vinyl Institute (VI), a division of
The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. (SPI), we are pleased
to submit the following comments on the above-captioned matter.
61 Fed. Reg-. 21,418 (May 10, 1996). As discussed below, we
.support.suboption 1 as it relates to F024 wastes.
RESPONSE , ,
EPA is addressing the commenter's concerns in today's final-rule.
1296
-------
DCN PH2A012 • ' \ '.
COMMENTER , Beazer East ~ . . - •.
RESPONDER JL
SUBJECT WOOD12 . - ,."
SUBJNUM 012 • ' -'•••/ , -."-'. • . -..-••
COMMENT EPA has identified three suboptions for implementation of the'
• proposed alternative treatment method. Suboption 1 would apply <..„'> •
the existing F024 combustion treatment standard to F032.
Suboption 2 would establish the incineration/combustion
• alternative standard but would require the combustion unit to ,
achieve a dioxin/furan emission standard. Thus, such units would
be required to install controls to limit the potential for . . '
forming and emitting dioxin/furan emissions into the atmosphere
or adsorption into the,waste. EPA has suggested that the • ' / • '
dioxin/furan emission standard proposed by EPA under the Clean
.' Air Act, that is, a maximum toxicity. equivalent emission r •• .
standard of 0:2 mg/dscf for combustion units burning ..
RCRA-hazardous wastes, could be a requirement of the combustion x
alternative treatment standard. Under this suboption, any
RCRA-permitted or interim status combustion device capable of
... meeting the 0.20 mg/dscf standard would be allowed to combust .
F032. The third suboption would limit the combustion of F032 . . -
. * waste to combustion devices that have been permitted (i.e.,
v Suboptions 1 and 2 would apply to interim status and ' „
fully-permitted facilities but under Suboption 3 only .
fully-permitted facilities could accept hazardous waste). 61
Fed. Reg. 21421. •.".., . .
RESPONSE. " - ' ' ''\ .'..,•'.-• ' ' ' '•' .-.'•.•'.••'
In today's final rule, EPA is promulgating, as proposed, numerical limits and
an alternative compliance treatment standard for the regulation of each Dioxin and Furan
(D/F) constituent regulated in F032 and F024; After reviewing public comments, EPA
decided not to promulgate suboptions 1 and 2. In addition, EPA amended the proposed
suboption 3 and promulgated a revised combustion --"CMBST" — treatment standard
alternative that meets BDAT under the Land Disposal Restrictions. The revised "CMBST"
standard is only available for those units operating pursuant to permit conditions under 40
CFR 264, Subpart O, or operating under the Part 266 standards for BIFs. F032 or F024
wastes treated pursuant to the ."CMBST". treatment compliance alternative do not have to be
monitored to see if the numerical limits for D/F constituents have been achieved. However,
the other .organic and metal constituents must be analyzed to assure they meet the applicable
UTS limit as a prerequisite to land disposal. ,
1297-
-------
' : Facilities'who choose to combust F032 or F024 in an incinerator operating
pursuanfto 265 provisions must meet the applicable treatment limit for each one of the
resulated D/-F constituents, organics, and metals as a prerequisite to land disposal. .EPA also
believes that facilities operating a Part 265 incinerator that can demonstrate to EPA that their
combustion device operates in a manner that conforms to the combustion controls achieved by
Part 264 incinerators or Part 266 BIFs may qualify for the CMBST-treatment standard
pursuant to a treatability variance under 268.42(b). (See Final Background Document for
Wood Preserving Wastes F032, F034, and F035, April 15, 1997, and today's preamble '
discussion.) . . ' •
1298
-------
pCN PH2A012, - ' . ' ' ,; - v '.
COMMENTED Beazer " • '-'
RESPQNDER JLabiosa . • * •. . /: ' ; ;. '. '
SUBJECT WOOD12 , ' ' ' .
SUBJNUM 012 '',.., v • .
COMMENT Beazer East, Inc. ("Beazer'1), and its..subsidiaries and
affiliates with:headquarters in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, hereby
'. submit comments in response to the United States Environmental
Protection Agency's ("EPA's" or the "Agency's") notice of data
availability for the Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV
Proposed Rule.-Issues Associated with Clean Water Act Treatment
Equivalency, and Treatment Standards for Wood Preserving Wastes
and Toxicity Characteristic Metal Wastes, 61 Fed. Reg. 21418, '•','.
May 10, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the "Notice"). On
August 22, 1995, EPA proposed the Land Disposal Restriction
("LDR") Phase IV rule ("proposed Phase IV rulemaking") (60 Fed.
Reg..43654) which, among other things, set forth proposed
treatment standards for newly listed and characteristic wastes. ; . • .
Beazer provided comments to the August 22, 1995. Notice of
: Proposed Rulemaking which addressed the proposed LDRs for wood
' - .' preserving wastes F032, F034 and F035. These comments are
incorporated by reference as if fully set out herein. Seer '
: ' Comments of Beazer East, Inc. Regarding the August 22, 1995
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Request for Comment on Land
Disposal Restrictions - Phase IV, November 17, 1995. In the
instant Notice, EPA discusses certain data and comments that.it
' has received in response to the proposed Phase IV rulemaking and
requests comments on certain issues raised by the Phase IV
proposal commenters. 61 Fed..Reg. 21419.
RESPONSE . / •,., . . >
EPA is addressing the commenter's concerns in today's Final rule.
1299
-------
DCN ' PH2A014 . ' . . ' , . -
COMMENTER Env. Technologies Intl '.
RESPONDER JLABIOSA .. . . '
SUBJECT WOOD12 x •
SUBJNUM . 014 ' ' ' , -
COMMENT IL Treatment Standards for Wood Preserving Waste F032, and
Potentially E024 In this NODA, EPA has suggested three
alternative treatment standards-for F032.wood preserving wastes. '
61 FR at 21420-21. ETC is considering these alternatives in
greater detail and will provide supplemental comment. •
RESPONSE . * . -.
EPA did not, receive supplemental comments from ETC with regard to the
proposed "CMBST" treatment standard alternative and each one of the three proposed not
mutually exclusive suboptions. -
1300
-------
PCN PH2A015 ' :..-..-.
COMMENTER CKRC , ' ..•/•'-.' " ' '
RESPONDED JLABIOSA
SUBJECT /WOOD12 ( ' . .: " -' '• • ' ., '. . .
SUBJNUM '015 ' .' • •= -. . "' . . •
COMMENT In the following paragraphs, CKRC comments on specific concerns
raised within each NDA option to set an alternative treatment'.
standard for F032 wastes that the Agency-has published for
comment, but stresses the importance of our fundamental process \
concern as it is applicable to each specific issue identified in ..
this comment letter. ^ .•••'•' ( ' .
RESPONSE . . ' ' • . • ' - ''•'"..-
After reviewing public comments, EPA concurs with the commemer that
promulgation of regulatory performance requirements for combustion technologies treating
D/F constituents in F032 arid F024 will ultimately be addressed in the MACT rule and that
finalizing the MACT standards at this time is premature. The standards are only proposed,
and may well undergo change as a result of public comments received. EPA intends to
finalize the proposed MACT standards in April 1998. EPA believes further that until MACT
standards are promulgated, standards for permitted incinerators and for BIFs (which may be
supplemented by conditions adopted pursuant to permit writer's omnibus authority, upon a
proper site-specific,demonstration of need) are sufficient to assure that D/F in the waste will be
destroyed to the level of the treatment standard. The particular controls are those .assuring .
proper combustion efficiency, 'and, for some units, at-the-stack D/F standards. EPA therefore
has modified its proposal. : ,
1301
-------
DCN .PH2A016 ' ' - '
COMMENTED .DuPorit ••
RESPONDER JLABIOSA . '
SUBJECT WOOD12 -
SUBJNUM 016
COMMENT " DuPont is pleased to submit one original, "two paper and one
. . computer disk ASCII file-copy of our comments on the
Environmental Protection Agency's notice of data availability
for Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV Proposed Rule-Issues
• Associated With Clean Water Act Treatment Equivalency, and
' Treatment Standards for Wood Preserving Wastes and Toxicity
. Characteristic Metal Wastes published in the Federal Register on
May 10, 1996. DuPont is a generator and treater of hazardous
wastes which are potentially impacted by this rulemaking, once
final. If there are questions regarding any of the information.
provided in this package, please call me at 302-774-8056.
DuPont appreciates your consideration of these comments.
RESPONSE .
EPA is addressing the commenter's concerns in this final rule.
1302
-------
1303
-------
DCN. PH2A021 ' '
COMMENTER J.H.Baxter .-'-.'• - ' -
RESPONDER JLABIOSA •
SUBJECT . WOOD 12 • ,
SUBJNUM 021 . . . .
COMMENT J.H. Baxter & Company (J.H. Baxter) submits these comments, on
the information set forth in the above-referenced notice. J.H.
Baxter is a family-owned company in the wood preserving
industry. J.H. Baxter-is very concerned about the potential
impact of the proposed regulations on the industry and submitted
comments on EPA's August 1995 Notice, proposing land disposal
restrictions for certain wood preserving wastes. Two aspects of
EPA's May 10 Notice'concern J.H.. Baxter: 1) treatment standards
for F032 wastes; and 2) excluding wood preserving-waste waters
from the definition of solid waste.
RESPONSE : ' ' ,
EPA is addressing the commenter's concerns in today's final rule.
1304
-------
I
I
OCN V PH4P113 '. . ' ,'.'.-.
.COMMENT ER Chemical Manufacturers; Association
RESPONDER IL . " .- ' . • ' ""
SUBJECT WOOD12- "Non Detection Limits"
SUBJNUM • 113 '.,'.-• ..'-..
.COMMENT . ' . .
B. EPA should allow concentration-based as well as
technology-based criteria to satisfy BDAT for metals in
. ' nonwastewater forms of F032, F034, and F035. .
In the preamble, EPA indicates that for metal in nonwastewater
. forms of F032, F034, and F030, stabilization is BOAT for chromium
. (total), and that vitrification is BOAT for arsenic. Use.of the . .
word "is" and not the phrase standards "... are based on"-implies
that the Agency intends to allow only the use of these specific
' technologies to treat these constituents, to levels below which
these wastes may be land disposed. However, the regulatory
language in the table at 268.40 indicates .that the nonwastewater
,. standards for arsenic and chromium are numerical standards -
CMA has commented in the past that it generally favors
concentration-based treatment standards for BDAT and that it
• supports the allowance of technology-based standards as
an alternative to, and not as a replacement for,
concentration-based standards. We maintain this position. Although
- the Agency and CMA may not currently be aware of technologies
, other than stabilization and vitrification that could be used to
treat for chromium and arsenic in the wastes described above, we
favor the flexibility afforded by a concentration-based standard
which would allow any technology that can meet these levels as an '
alternative. CMA requests that the preamble language be modified to
clarify that any technology that can meet the levels indicated in
the table may be used. '.'-'.
In addition, EPA is proposing F032 wastewater and nonwastewater
1 standards that would require meeting a concentration that does not
exceed 1 ppb (or 1 ug/kg) for all the PCDD and PCDF homologue and
isomer constituents proposed for regulation for F032 wastes. Even
if a 1 ug/kg level is achievable for PCDD and for PCDF, analytical
limitations may preclude UTS levels this.low.
Normally when EPA sets treatment standards for.a waste
, constituent, a procedure is followed in which both an "accuracy
correction factor" and a "variability factor" are applied to the
concentration of the constituent .observed in the treatment data
that supports the standard. See, Final Best Demonstrated Available
- Technology (BDAT) Background Document for Universal Treatment
••'•'• • " " .1305
-------
,
Standards Volume A: Universal Treatment. Standards for Wastewater
Forms of Wastes, 52 (July 1994). The accuracy correction factor is
used to account for analytical limitations in the available
treatment performance data, and the variability factor is used
to correct for variations in waste treatment/sampling, analytical
techniques and procedures, and other factors that affect treatment
performance. - .
However, we are not sure if EPA accounted for variability and "
accuracy in setting the universal treatment standards for
nonwastewater forms of these organic wastes We urge EPA to do so.
As CM A has previously written in its July 9, 1993 comments on the
May 24,1993 Interim final rule on land disposal restrictions for
ignitable and corrosive characteristic wastes whose treatments
standards were vacated, organic wastestreams are not easily
analyzed for constituents at very low concentrations. CMA (
reiterates its previous recommendation that EPA explicitly.states
that, given approved test methods, nondeductible levels of i
constituents are equivalent to zero concentration and should also
be applied this the setting of UTS levels. .
RESPONSE
follow below:
The commenter raised four issues and EPA's responses to such comments
L Clarification that EPA is setting numerical limits for the regulation of Arsenic'
and Chromium (total) in wastewater arid nonwastewater forms of F032.
- -•• .
. EPA is clarify ing in today's final rule that EPA is promulgating UTS limits for
the regulation of Arsenic and Chromium (total) in F032, F034, and F035. Since EPA is
establishing UTS limits that are expressed as maximum concentrations of these metals allowed
for land disposal, the use of any treatment technologies capable of meeting the UTS limits is
not prohibited except for those that may constitute impermissible dilution.
2.
F032.
'Analytical Difficulties" may preclude the establishment of UTS limits for
EPA's lacks data from the commenter to assess what kind of technical
difficulties will be encountered during .the'analysis of F032 wastes. •
After reviewing the characterization data of the Penta Group, the reported
analytical difficulties, and F032 Characterization studies; EPA has concluded that the reported
1306 . •' '
-------
-difficulties" appear to represent more the unfamiliarity of chemists performing the chemical
analyses with D/F recommended test methods rather than"real flaws in the test method. EPA
• believes,further that the alleged "difficulties" can easily be overcome by routine laboratory
'clean-up procedures and the use of appropriate solvents and other laboratory calibration \
techniques. EPA has enhanced, therefore, the discussion of these recommended procedures
. and calibration techniques in the BOAT Background Document: • Also, see the Administr.any_e
Record supporting.today's Phase 4 finalrule for the technical document titled:
Background Paper Addressing Technical Issues Related to Analysis ofF032 Wood > ' '
Preserving Wastes for Dioxins arid Furans, dated June 19, 1996,
3. • <• EPA should correct the D/F limits for accuracy and variability.
• ' ,-':.'• ' • \
Several commenters were correct in pointing it out that EPA did-not correct
'the proposed UTS limits for D/F in F032 with accuracy and variability factors, as typically ' -
done in the'calculation of treatment standards of other hazardous constituents prohibited from
land disposal. EPA did not adjust the proposed UTS limits for D/F constituents, nor EPA is
doing so in today.'s final rule, as explained below. • , ;
.' . '• * _ •
The UTS,treatment limits are based on combustion.technologies that EPA
believes will meet the proposed UTS. limits for D/F in F032 as long as the combustion of F032
is conducted in a device that is well designed and well operated. EPA concluded in the
. Solvents and Dioxins rule that a six-nines Destruction and Removal Efficiency,(DRE)
combustion device can routinely achieve the promulgated limit (see January 18, 1986, 51 FR
- (1733-1735)). Based on the performance of a four-nines DRE rotary kiln incinerator burning
F024, EPA believes that a four:nines DRE unit that is well designed and operated can also
meet the promulgated UTS limits for D/F (see June 1, 1990, 55 FR (22580-22581). Although
none of the submitted comments or data appear to support the revisions to D/F limits proposed
by the commenters, EPA may revisit this issue in a separate rulemaking if new data become
available..
,./'-.. '•'.'"'.•',''" ' ' . . • .
However, EPA points out to the commenter that EPA generally allows
deviations from the promulgated treatment limits to concentration of up to one order of
• magnitude above the applicable treatment standard (i.e. the 'numerical UTS limit) prescribed in
the 40 CER 268,40, for the ashes arising from combustion devices. EPA refers to such
treatment limits allowances as the analytical detection limit (compliance) alternative. .Facilities
seeking the disposal of .such combustion ashes must satisfy the provisions in the 40 CFR
268.40 (d) (1) through (3) and 268.7 (b) (5) (Hi). (Also, see June 1, 1990, 55 FR (22541r .
225*2).)' ; ' . '•'--...../- '.-.'...' '
• ' • ^ . ' * i %
In addition, EPA has set.an alternative compliance treatment standard that sets
combustion "CMBST" as a treatment standard for-D/F for nohwastewater forms of F032.
To qualify for a "CMBST" treatment standard, the combustion device should be operated
• under a 40 CFR 264 Subpart O or under a 266 operating permit and the Permit writer
*• ', ' • ' ' ' ' • '
. ' : • ' ' '. ! 1307 - .' '.''..•
-------
will use his/her Omnibus power authorities to determine if a combustion device seeking to treat
F032 can be deemed well operated and well designed combustion devices. If deemed a well
operated and designed combustion device, the facility will not have to monitor the
concentrations of D/F constituents in wastewater and nonwastewater forms arising from the
combustion of F032. EPA feels therefore that such alternative compliance treatment standard
fully addresses the concerns raised by the commenters. .- , •
4.
Proposal that "riondetection limits" are equivalent to zero detection.
. EPA believes the commenter is concern that,a detection limit in a treated %.vaste
above a UTS numerical limit may fail to meet the applicable treatment standard even if the
targeted analyte is below the detection limit. EPA believes that a "nondetection limit" is'not
feasible way to address this concern. EPA believes that a constituent shown below a particular
targeted detection limit means that the constituent is either destroyed by the employed
technology, mask in the waste residue due to matrix interferences, or it could be measured in
concentrations below the targeted detection limit. As a result, it could be possible that the
constituent of LDR concern is still above the applicable UTS limit should the targeted selection
limit be above the UTS promulgated'limit. Therefore, EPA believes that.a facility could still be,
deemed in violation of the applicable limit if EPA detects such constituent above its UTS
limit.' ... .
However, EPA points out to the commenter that EPA generally allows
deviations from the promulgated treatment limits to concentration of up to one order of
magnitude above the applicable treatment standard (i.e. the numerical UTS limit) prescribed in
the 40 CFR 268.40, for the ashes arising from combustion devices. EPA refers to such
treatment limits allowances as the analytical detection limit (compliance) alternative. Facilities
seeking the disposal of such combustion ashes must satisfy the provisions in the 40 CFR
268.40 (d) (1) through (3) and 268.7 (b) (5) (iii). (Also, see June 1, 1990, 55 FR (22541-
22542).) Another option available to the commenter is to verify if the waste of concern is
different from the one supporting the UTS limit and seek from EPA a treatability variance
pursuant to provisions in the 40 CFR 268.44. .
1308
-------
RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS
ON THE PROPOSED PHASE IV
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTION RULE:
Wood Preserving Wastes
Office of Solid Waste,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
April 15, 1997.
1309
-------
1310
-------
INTRODUCTION ,
EPA proposed the .Phase IV Land Disposal Restriction (LDR) rule in August 4995 to .
"regulate decharacterized wastewaters and several newly listed hazardous wastes.1 As.part of the
proposed rule, .the Agency solicited and .received public comments. This document reviews EPA's.
response to comments that relate to the Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) conducted for the 'l
proposed Phase IV rule.2 We discuss below only those comments related to the analysis of the
costs, benefits, and economic impacts of the proposed rule.? We also exclude.discussion of
, . comments on the portion of the proposed rule addressing decharacterized wastewaters. In March
. 1996 Congress passed the Land Disposal Program Flexibility Act, a statute that-essentialiy
/postpones any decision on potential regulation of decharacterized wastewaters until EPA
. conducts a study of.the risks posed by units that manage these wastes. We-alsp.exclude • '
discussion of comment on the portion of the proposed rule addressing treatment standards for 1C
metals. The Agency is reproposing treatment standards for TC metal nonwastewaters. .-"
Responses to public comments made on the TC metals portion of the proposed rule will be
addressed in the response to comments document for the final rule.
In several instances, comments on the proposed rule led EPA to initiate new analysis to
reflect the concerns of commeritors and to incorporate their suggestions for improving the impact
assessment.. We identify below the major issues raised in the comments and describe the analysis
. that we performed in response. We address: each of the major issues cpmmentors raised for the
Phase IV LDR rule regarding treatment standards proposed for newly identified wood preserving
wastes; . ' v -
s ' •--.'• i ' .
WOOD PRESERVING LDRS
'- v " •*! ' ' " i
Summary of Comments
.Commentors on the portion of the rule that establishes LDRs at UTS levels for wood
preserving wastes focused on three major issues: (1) comrrientors in the wood preserving industry
. suggested that the economic impact of establishing dipxin treatment standards based on "six
nines" incineration is very large and is underestimated in the RIA because they disagree with both •
1 EPA, "Land Disposal Restrictions •,- Phase IV," 60 PR 43654, August 22, 1995.
• See Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Phase IV Land Disposal Restriction Rule, which can
be found in the docket for this rule. , . .
' t • •
. 3 In most cases we have not addressed the wide range.of comments that deal with EPA's
selection of specific policy options. Examples of such comments include arguments related to the
Agency's decision to regulate specific constituents, the'suitability of granting compliance variances .
to certain industries, and the basis for selecting concentration standards. EPA's response to these
comments is summarized in the preamble to the final rule. ... , _ •• '.•• •
'. •"• • ' .- 1311 - . - . '• . ..-,'.••'
-------
the cost per ton and tonnage affected estimates in the R1A (e.g., estimates of tonnage affected did
not include quantities of remedial waste at wood preserving sites); (2) commentors supported
language in the rule that would'provide exemptions for recycling of wood preserving
wastewaters; and (3) commentors expressed some concern about differences in the quantity
estimates in the capacity analysis and RIA (the difference was substantial, approximately an order
of magnitude) and 4) commentors-expressed concern that EPA had underestimated costs of the
proposed rule for media (e.g., soil and groundwateh) contaminated'with wood preserving waste.
Most of the commentors expressed similar concerns'and most referred explicitly'to the co.mments
of the American Wood Preservers Institute. ' ' . . ' "
EPA's Response ' . '
EPA's revised RJA addresses most of the concerns of commentors. First, [[[revisions to
the proposed rule .allow for less stringent "four nines" incineration of wood preserving wastes^-
affected by the rule. EPA reconsidered its suggestion that these wastes be combusted only in
units meetings a "'six nines7' standard. This was not required in the listing rule itself, and is not
warranted in any case.since these wastes are not listed as acute hazardous — the principal dcc.'dcf.
- contaminant are HCDD/HCDFs, not the more toxic TCDD/TCDFs.. • As a result of this change. .
the estimated unit costs for incineration dropped substantially, from approximately S6.000 per ton
to a range of $1,000 to $1,500 per ton, depending on whether the waste contains both organic .
and metal hazardous constituents (wastes that contain both types of constituents are more costly
to treat to UTS standards). EPA has also evaluated the option of treating newly-identified wood
preserving wastes in other combustion units such as cement kilns and the economic feasibility of''
this option. • ., . -
\ ' • • '.
Second, the final rule affirms an exclusion for recycling of certain wood preserving
wastewaters -- this assumption is reflected in the cost and affected waste analysis conducted for
the revised RIA, as it was in the RIA supporting the proposed rule. - • ' -
Third, EPA devoted considerable effort to developing revised estimates of the total,
quantity of affected waste that accurately affect the legitimate uncertainty in measuring these
quantities using existing sources of information. The revised RIA now incorporates a range of
estimates, with the low end of this range based on the waste-per-unit-'product approach employed
in the RIA for the proposed rule and the high end of this range reflecting quantities of wood
.preserving wastes reported in EPA's Biennial Reporting System. After careful efforts to correct
for differences in the manner in which the data were collected and interpreted, the two estimates
nonetheless still differ by a factor of five. Differences in these estimates reflect that BRS^
estimates include some undetermined amount of soil and debris not captured in the waste-perr
unit-production approach, and may also reflect some uncertainty over the physical form of the
waste as reported in the BRS. Using a range of estimates is a reasonable method to reflect these
uncertainties in evaluating the quantity of affected wastes. . _ ' ' •. ..
i . . . • '
EPA also explored the possibility of updating affected waste estimates that rely oh the
waste-per-unit-product approach used in the proposed RIA, but found that the wood preserving
- • ' ' 1312 . ' '
-------
industry no longer sponsors development of the comprehensive, detailed estimates of industry .
production necessary to implement this approach: Recent industry data-collection efforts may not
represent trends in the industry as a'whole, and;do hot provide information at the detailed level
necessary to update the waste-per-unit-product approach. The result of EPA's efforts to improve
estimates of the impact of wood preserving LDRs are summarized in Exhibits 1 and 2 below.. .
1313
-------
. '• •" Exhibit 1
: QUANTITY ESTIMATES FOR NEWLY LISTED WOOD
PRESERVING WASTES BY PRESERVATIVE TYPE
Preservative Type (Wastecode i
Number of
Generating
Facilities*
Low-End.
Micklewright-based
Quantitv (tons >b
, High-End;
BRS'-basetl Quantity
. • (tons)'
WastewatcrsJ • . . - • ' :
Creosote (Fi\34V
Crci;**eAnor*anic , .' ''
• Chlcfnphemu iF032> '. • ' '
Chlorophenol/lnoreanic (F0321
Chlorophenol/Creosote i F03 2)
Chlorophenol/lnoraanic/Creosote i F03 2}
Inorcahic (F0351
TOTAL -
40
18 -
19
12
6
12
362' .
' 469
284.3-5
55.220 ' •
56.754 >
34.632
-'37.193 ' -
".S3 5
,0"
546.009
44r> ,
i) • -
;:.-MV'.:
• 0
0
• . 1) ' • .
• ' 59
13.260 -
Nonwaste'waters' • ' . ' . ' , • . •
Creosote (.F0341 ' . . .
Creosote/lnoreanic i'F034>
Chlofophenol(F032") _ ' .
Chlorophenolflnorganic (F032) .'.
Chlorophenol/Creosote (F032) -
Chlorophenol/Inorganic/Creosote (T032) ' • ,
Inorsamc (F035t '
TOTAL
40
18
19'
12
' 6
12"'
362 .
469
1 .086
242
348
• ' 240 :
' 170'
-424
1.350
3.860'
1 .6~ I' - '
8.751
.2.3 85' •
• ' "
- ' L165» •' '
,
- . 2.907? •
. • "284 ' •'
, 18.808
' Number of active facilities data was taken from the 1 993 Micklewright report: BRS data indicate a total estimate of over
, • 200 facilities generating primary newlv listed wood' preserving wastes. ...
k . Quantitv' estimates are based on data from. Wood Preservation Statistics;-] 993: A Report to the Wood~Preserving . .
Industry* in the United States (Tables 7 and 8") and waste generation rates.fronv./fegu/atory Impact Analysis for. th<.' Finn:
^ Listing of Certain Wood Preserving Wastes (.Exhibit 2-17"). . .. '. ' '
c ' Quantiw estimates are based on data from "Revised Wood Preserving Estimates," a memorandum from. 1C F Incorporated
to EPA's Capacity Programs Branch.' June 1 8. 1 996 and include an unknown amount of soil and debris.
d ' Includes quantity estimates for wastewaters and preservative drippage. " • '
'* ' No wastewaters/preservative drippage are generated. Facilities recycle/reuse all of their F035 wastewaters.
' t Includes quantitv-estimates for process solid residuals. Spent formulations are assumed .to be rhinimal. and -therefore are
,not affected by the proposed Phase IV restrictions. . .
4 • In the BRS scenario, we were unable to directly classify all F032-bearing wastes. Therefore, we- have allocated the total
• -F032-bearing waste quantity (8.102 tons') according to the proportions in the Micklewright scenario.
i
1
\
. r
-
•
1314
-------
Exhibit!
Prese^ativjOv^^
Waste Quantity
(tons)_
12-
to
170 to_
424^-2121
^ i
Combined LDR
Treatment and
Subtitle'C
Disposal'
S 1.0 to SI 6
SQ.3toSlb.4
S0.3loS2.2
Subtitle C
'Land,
Disposal
(Baseline)
JiO.2 loj
SO. 1- to S1.6_
Incremental
Treatment G>
i in million" L
J0_2_v>
<0.? '>
SQ.2toSl.l
_s'o.5'lo_S3.5
SO.TloSQ.l
to
•sQ. 1 to
. 1 to
,1 10 SOj
to
to S3.7.
•s __
IV affeetea nom> a^.
ers are recycled/reused.
/ " . •
Incineration costs for F032 arid F034 nomvastewaters assume a 99.99 percent destruction and removal efficiency rate.
The values in the F035 range appear in descending order to.mairitain the format within the range: the first value refcren
the low-end N/ucklewnght scenario, while the second value references the'high-end, BRS scenario. This is reflected in
totals! • • ' ' ' , . ' " • . J_ ' ' ,' . v • ' ' ., • . • •
-r>A-n m;Yrti wasle reguiated by'Phascll LDRs
,nc
the low-end N/licklewnght scenaiiu. .
totals! • -• , . ' " • . , .
Totals may not add due to rounding. •, • . •. ' ,
Baseline costs for F032 include incineration costs for 180 tons of F032/D037-mixed waste reguiatedbv'PhascUl.pRs
—j ^/ wnnd oreserving wastes is being
• ' —i
OtaiS lim> u^v
. baseline costs for F032 include incineration cusu i^. . _.
Finally, because environmental media contaminated by wood preserving wastes is being
granted a capacity variance for two years, no costs from the Phase IV final rule will be incurred
• 'during this time period. Beyond this time period, any remaining remediation of these contaminated '
media still have a series of alternatives that would preclude the. need to .incinerate these media as ' •
comrhenters claim. In-situ treatment of these media are exempt from LDR treatment standards. '
Second, placement of wood preserving remediation wastes into or within a Corrective Action
Management Units (CAMU) designated by the Regional Administrator .does not-constitute land
disposal. 40 CFR §264.552(a)(,l). Third, the alternative treatment standard for dioxins and rurans •
] • for F032 wastes allows combustion in a wider range of units (e.g., cement kilns) at a lower cost than
in the proposed rule. Fourth, hazardous' debris can be treated using alternative treatment standards
.provided at 40 CFR §268.45, Finally, prospective EPA rulemakings such as the Hazardous Waste
. Identification Rule for contaminated media should be in effect at the end of the capacity variance ,
• ' . • • uis -."-..' ' ' : ' •
-------
period and afford some regulatory relief through the promulgation of generic'exit levels for
hazardous constituents. For these reasons. EPA believes that "it is inappropriate to attribute
treatment costs to the Phase IV final rule for vyood preserving contaminated media.
1316
-------
»
Contact: . .Bill Pii, Marketing Manager, ' . . . ":, . ' ":: ••
. Company:.... Rhone-Poulenc, Shelton, Connecticut / , -•. . .
... J>hone: ,i[203) 925-1300 -.-.. v ''.:'• • • ' .. -' '••••'.' . " . : . - .
Date: . 8/li9/91 '.".''•-•'•:'.• ...' • '/;.;•'_. '•'••'•'•[': .
;.. Qtller: PrakashRamaswamy" .,'.. ' .. ...
. Subject: ,. Hazardous waste incineration capacity of all of Rhone-Poulenc's facilities. *
Report of Discussion: ". .: ; '. - ::-'" .-•'•''•,••' , •'. . .• '-;..'
'" Mr. Fu provided, updates on all incinerators owned by Rhone-Poulenc. Mr. Fu provided
• present and'future capacities, .waste; acceptance,and permit status-for each facility. ' He
, requested that information pertaining to capacities be classified as CBL •- '.'
If
«-• ^. II M ^r
* sf — « 0
<» O - m
o. a — «
•. o «« -
8 & S •
S:S
2 .3 Jf.
o:
o
.o.
-------
-------
I I
. L ..'..''•'... . . ' , c.-io , ;.• /. - - ..-.• ;•.-,.•••;. •.. .
Contact:.- ' Steve Change, Environmental Compliance Specialist • •• , '. . •..'
Company: Rollins, BatonRouge,Louisiana ' * •.. .. ''•••;. "•••"•••
Phone: . (504)778-3607 •'• ''"". \ ,; !
;Date:: ' 8^20/91 . / .','•' '.-''.'• .- '' ' -'.-.' •' '-'^ •'
(Men : . Prakash Ramaswamy • . . . -. - , . -
Subject:/ • Update of facility"* hazardous waste incineration capacity. '• • •
Report of Discussion: " . " , .
Explained and faxed capacity update form.to Mr. Change. He indicated that form will be
completed and returned. .; . ' •-.'.• ' . , ,
in
-
a a —
*: 8 "
o
o
K)
o
Ui
U3
-------
-------
Contact: Eric: Chokan, Supervisor of Marketing and Research . ' '
./Company: Ross .Incineration Services, Grafton, Ohio . . . •. . •'... ' ,
> Phone: ' ' (216) 748t22
. *3 - S £ S
"'" n -* 2
n ™. •» „ tn
&• o. ** *» -
• o " j.. ,
• » '
:-
- Q.
'.'.'• to...:
-------
-------
'.' P«WK«P
|j
Contact: Rudy Vingris, Marketing Manager • •,' " .'..". ; .-''.y
Company: • Chemical Waste Management, Oak Brook, Illinois •• " - :'• • :'
Phoiie:. •"' (.708)218:1618 : .'. •;' ''.'•'. . . ;
Date: ,; 8/27/91 ' ... ' ' • ' -''- '' •' ' • . ' : . ; '. ' '.'-'
Caller Prakash Ramaswamy ! . ' • : . ' .•
Subject:'. " . Capacity update for all of CWM's commercial incinerator facilities (SCA,
TWI, Port Arthur) ' ..... ' ., . . :.. .
•Report of Discussion: • • . • ' . .•''••>' '• . • - ' .
. Explained aod faxed.capacity update form to Mr. Vingris. He indicated that-form-will be
completed and returned.. He also requested that information to capacities be classified as
CBL '- •' ' •••••"•• • ' .-.'••'• ;. -..' ••' . -•-,•".'. .''.;-
c •* 3
-
j- tf -
S of •
o
-a/
o:-
o.
-" ' >
.-. . - « •
:••" ,.^;A-* -•"'
-------
-------
•
- 13
Contact: , Amos Weiheke, Customer Service • . _ '• .
Company: Aptus, Coffeyville, Kansas ,, . . •' ' •'..]
Phone: ; (800) 292-2558 ' ''. .
Date: ",/ 9/18/91 . - '-. . , •".' . : .; ..•'. / " ,
.Caller: .'•• Prakash Raraaswamy ... . • ;
• : "' '''I,- •"••',.
Subject : Confirm that facility accept F037/F038 wastes. .
• ': •-'• ^ ',-•*' • • • ' •• •
Report of Discussion: : ' .• . ' '.-••' . ' '•'.
Mr. Weineke confirmed that the facility can accept F037/F038 wastes;
-
s " »
'• =-•* f ft *•
..«• 6 £ tro
•-
o-
o-
N)
c> ..-
o • '
trf
M3
-------
-------
r
C - 14
1 '<
' Contact: ,' Marine Weldmah, Technical Representative - : ..
i,' ,•'-•-.. " ' ' •. ' • .•.'-'• '-..'•''•.'•:'
Company: '.. Rollins Envifbnmental, Bridgeport, New Jersey ...
.Phonc:\ ;\ '(609)497-3100 .' , . -..,,.-
' Date:". . 9/18/91, / • -;•"'. :'..;•->'., . ';
Caller. Prakash Ramaswamy • ' .. .
Subject:. Cohfinn that facility can accept F037/F038 wastes. -:
Report .of Discussion: '.-.'• ''..'; '.•
Ms. Weldman confinied that the facility can accept F037/F038 wastes.
* - z
-o2s-3
,.. slsis
,
.-So g1,.
"
,o
p..
K)
.«
O
o
-------
-------
F
. -.. .,','•'.'••••'' c-15 .•'.':.•'••'. ..-..•••• '•
Contact . Edward Limb, Manager of RCRA Enguieering.Section ; ' -
Company:' Ohio Envirombenta!'Protection Agency, Columbus, Ohio
"Phone: . (614) JS44-3020 . . •; - r . ; • .
Date: . . - 10/07/91' . . '' '. - ;."""; ' . , ':;: . .
Calier: , Prakash Ramaswamy -••• . •• .'• • .."•'.
Subject: .Permit status, expected start up date for the Waste-Tech commercial
hazardous waste incinerator in East Liverpool, Ohio.'
Report of Discussion:'- . ' -: •• ' '. . ' • ;,
Mr. Limb reported that the facility received a final Pan B permit'in 1984 and that trial burns
are scheduled for May 1992. He indicated that the facility will be on-line in February 1993.
„
0. CL — St
'
S
*i)
o
o
OJ.
cs
1 '' • '
^j-i
M3
-JC'
-------
-------
C -.16
. .Contact:' Cheryl Hying, Engineer ' . '', '.' ', . ;" • •
Company: ' Utah'Departmeiit of Environmental Quality, Division of Solid and Hazardous
. " ' ; Waste, SaJt Lake City* Utah ' . . , V
Phohe::. ^(801) 538^110. . '; • ' "... .
Dater ' •_ 11/12/91 ''. ; ' ••.-''. •' ' • "'" '.' . ' ' ' .
Caller: -Prakash.Ramasv-amy . .'.'•'.'-'
' • Subject: Permit status, expected-start up'date for the USPCi commercial hazardous
-'• . waste incinerator in Tooele, Utah . ' . ' . -•' . •' .'
Report of Discussion: . •• ' . : • ••
-. Ms. Hying reported that the facility received-a-Part B from the state on November 1,1991.
. She also reported that the facility is currently under' construction and that trial burns are
expected tostartin late 1992. She estimates |that facility should be on-line late.in 1993.
•-.yllf
•? o 2 y o
. "•'•?'3 f "-S
» -"-
•
". ; O.
to
•- '-..o'
OJ.
up
un
-------
-------
.-."•.-'-. ' ' , ' ', : C-,17 • ' ,-;••' .' •', ;•• ' '.
.Contact:",: Glenn Dively, Environmental Engineer .' •;"''•' ' . • .•
•Company: •: Nebraska'Depanment of Environmental Control/Lincoln Nebraska •'
Phone:'' (801)538-6170,.. .' \ '<-.• ;; - ;. ,
Date:"'.: . 11/12/91 , ."-"-• ,"••' : • ' , •• /•'•_' - -;- -
Caller:1' . Prakash Ramaswamy' . , • - .-, . ••
Subject;. Permit status, expected ,stan up date for-the Waste-Tech', commercial
::' ~. ,hazardous waste incinerator in Kimbcll, Nebraska. •. '. •"• -
. Report of Discussion": .•'. , '-' • . .. '"••:•.•• •••'.'•'"•
Mr. Dively reported that the facility will receive a Draft Part B permit from the state in
March,1992 to began construction of the incinerator and associated facilities and.that.trial.
bums are expected iii November 199Z .He indicated; barring any unexpected'delays, the
.facility should be on-line in October 1993. ; .." : . > .
" ' fi 2 B P
Son
•:.>rj ..
'••' O-
-,o •".
C3
en
-------
-------
rr
C- 18'
Contact: Rusty Lundber& Manager of Planning arid Project Development Section
Company: Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Solid and Hazardous
,.•••;-.. : Waste, Salt llake City, Utah ' . '. ' ' .,•:.. . .
?i • " , - "' . ' ' ' ' - .
Phone: (801)538^6170. : - .. :- '. , . !
Date:'..- . ' H/12/91 > '.',.''"''•''•• - ; ' ; '
Caller: Prakash Ramasvt'amy • . • ••-.••
Subject: •Permitted capacities for the USPCI commercial hazardous waste incinerator
';.':•.. facility in Tooele, Utah. .././. , . •-• -
Report of Discussion: ' ; . . '
Mr. Lundberg repdned that the facility will have a total permitted capacity of 130,000 tons
per year. He also indicated that the facility.Submitted.a TSCA permit to USEPA (Region
') for burning PCB contaminated wastes.' " , -. .'• , ' -• ..••'''.
C ?K.
'• §"
a - a
. i
o
o.
N)
^Tl.
Q-
O--
~J
US
wj
-------
-------
• B •
'
C-19
;CEMENt KILN
FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION
i'JH.
•« o £ s- o
•3 " » " S
B = n •» X
» ?' — » 2
n •" . S m
e. o. — « -
S
.
.1st
O
O-.
K)
*n -
*o-
•o .
CQ
-------
-------
• «MK7«> _
. C, 20
Contact: Joe Gaibraith •
Company: EPA Region 7
Phone:
(913) -551-7051
Date: 2 March, 1992 • ' '. . ' " . ..
' Caller: ' . Usette .Lambregts . ' ' • .•'. " '• . ' ' • .'';'-.•
Subject: -Issues pertaining to Region 7 cement kilns .burning, hazardous wastes.
Report of Discussion: . , " •" • •• • .. • • • .-..-.
Compliance: Mr. Gaibraith believes all facilities in Region' 7 are progressing pretty smoothly
toward certification. Two may be dose (Heartland and Lafarge) but he believes they .will
all make it by the August 1992 deadline. .Some have already completed test burns;
. BTU limits: Should go away in Missouri and Nebraska," those two states haven't indicated
• any interest-in setting up new regulations.' Kansas will stUJ have a~5 or 6,000 BTU/lb
minimum, and a tax system for wastes under the minimum. Blenders will-be able to "blend
up", but the proportion of wastes under 5,000. BTUAb will be taxed as if it were going to an
incinerator. , . ' . . . • •••'.' •-•.".. ' , ••' • ,.
Public opposition:^ Always exists, but he doesii|t believe.there is any opposition .that will
prevent kirns from burning wastes after 21'August, 1992; '' '...-•
••S*
-
• « -<•
a™ «• _ In
o. — «»
,tu
•..'"* .
to
^d
o
•o
u>
UQ
-------
-------
-' '..'• ' " . ,' -' '.. - ' "•'. C-21 ;' '••;•/ • - ' -• '•.,- - .:;, '-'
Contact: Ruben Casso '.' ''.'-.-. • . • V -
Company: EPA Region 6 . •-.'
Phone:'"''. - (215) 655,6785 '• .' ! •. .' '; • ,';'.': '/ :"'. _ .'.
Date: ' 2 March, 1992 '• ' •. ', . ' ./' -. '/' .
Caller: Lisetie Lambrcgu ' -:'•.,
Subject: • . issues penaining to Region 6 cement kilns burning hazardous wastes..
•. Report of Discussion: • ; . ' ' . ' . . •. , •.•'•
Discussion focused on Ash ;Grove". Foreman, AR, which is the only Region 6 kiln burning
solids. "• ". -''.•''•' ' . '. '•,",•-.' • •.-''•'
..Compliance: Mr.Casso believes they are onschedule and should haveno problem certifying.
compliance by 21 August.1992. . .
*-.',' ' i ""• ' ' •' . '
BTU limitation on kilns and blenders: \lr- Casso believes that blenders will still have to
abide by a minimum BTU limit or 5,000 BTU/lb.'.
' .. - •'•• " '. .''- ' - ' •'.'•' '--••- '.- • • ,-:.• • - '
Public opposition: Mr. Casso isn't aware of any real threat to hazardous waste burning.
TTiere is always public opposition, and they'll know the extent of it better after the public
comment period. ' . -.
S o •
-< ?ftx
a ~ sr Q
o n
c e **
3-
K>
.hrj ,
o; •
O '
C3
-------
-------
T
. C-22
Contact: . Eric Hansen • . ' . /
Company: i Ash Grove Cement .•' '
-Phone; ." (913) 45I-&00 /
5 March. 1992:,'
Lisette.Lanibiregts
Date:
Ciller:
Subject:
.Petroleum refining waste'combustion capacity and inconsistencies between.
L API and CKRCsun-ey results. '. '. • • : , . .:
Report of Discussion: • . '.-.-' '•• • •. ' ^ . ^ ' . . . '
Mr. Hansen could not comment on how API conducted their questionnaire, because^e does
not recall speaking with them, h is.possible for them to be "at capacity" on a given day in
the winter, when the kitas are rotating through their routine downtime for maintenance, but •
over the course of the;year;they have excess capacity. ,/•-• - •
Mr. Hansen said that he always gives the same response when anybody asks about capacity:
they have excess capacity for solids and.liquids. Solids capacity is approximately half utilized,
whicK translates to approximately 10,000 tons of available capacity per year per kiln in each
of Ash Grove's seven loins. Abo, they are not at their technical limit for solids burning, and
their current "maximum practical capacity" could be increase still further. If the material is .
available, the capacity'wiU foflow,shortly. Capacity is driven by demand. ".'-.. '.:,";.
Mr. Hansen si'd that relative to other hazardous wastes, F037 and F038 are ideal kilns feed
because,they have low metals and moderate BTU'content. '.'.'_'
o 2
o -..
''
-------
-------
..- '• •••.' -. .'''..' • '....'.•'••• Cf'23,'.. '..-". . ••.'.'
'Contact: Tom Patterson . , ' •
• ' , • " • ' • . - i '""•.''
• Company: -. ..Louisiana Department 'of Environmental Quality -. - • :-.
Phone: '.(514)342-1354 , ' v ' :•'•'• . .;
' ' *'"«!.- ' ' V '"'.,' '
Date: 10 March, 1992 ; -. ;- .: .- / - .
.Caller: Usett^Latnbregts . ., • ' . • • . , .
Subject: BTU for Louisiana blenders - ' .
. Report of Discussion:- ..' .'' .. ; ••" .' .. '•..•'.' . " •
. .' Louisiana's interpretation of the sham recycling policy is' that wastes under 5,000
BTU/lb do not add heating value, and are .therefore being incinerated, not recycled. This
will not change' after kilns certify compliance with the BIF rule.
,'• !•''• "' '...}'.' • ;\ '• ' ."
'V • •'"' i' " '''','.•••-' ',
..' '.:-'LI.^- f:-.-.
. :°-a-tf.
o
D
to
i^:
o-
CD
GO
C3
ru
-------
-------
C-.24
Contact: -.Dan Nugent - : - . . : .• .
.'--.'''• • *-,*('' ' .
• ' " . '..•-'- • . } - ".•'»"
Company: .Heartland Cement •'.., "• . '.''•'• ' " " ' , . .
, Phone: \ (215)866-4400 . j / . ' : ......
Datis: ; • 10 March, 1992 . . " .' " , :
Caller: ;•'• , Lisette Lambregts , . <• '.'.,' . '
Subjeci:' Petroleum refining waste combustion capacity, and inconsistencies between
. ' API and CKRCsun-ey results. . . \
Report of Discussion: ' ; ....
• At the time of the API/Gossrhah'call, he had only been in his position for a month,
and was still learning the ropes. He might have said he didn't know if they accepted K048-
52, F037 andFOSS, and API conservatively took that as 'a no. Mr. Nugent said Ed Mpnon
(Cemtechj-would certainly know.. ... ; •' :-
. He does not know whether they are currently burning these wastes, but believes they
are buming'primarily soh/ents in their hazardous waste fuel program. Mr. Nugent believes
Heartland is currently burning at their Missouri permitted limit. They are in the process of
.revising their permit to. increase volumes and range of wastes accepted. They are hoping'
.to combine test burns for this permit modification with their BIF test burns. this spring. •
a .
O. ;.
to
-------
-------
' • N '\ " • ' • > .
'• -•',' &„?*•":. *'^~,-**
- • . / ••. • .;•. .- C.-25; .,' .;• '; .'• • '•""•.-';••". .'"
Contact: '•' Joe Ford •....••'- J-.'- .;...'•; ••. • '• - '>•• '_.;•' : .
Company: •' -Medusa Cement • • ,;' .' , • ,.'. . >--1 • '
'Phone: ; (412) 535-4311'' .: ' I ;.;• '' .; ';..• ;; .-;;. ••'.; - '';'•':".•' '
.Date:, '- .. 10 March, 1992. ' . ' . ' ;•.-_'..; ' .... . • ; .
Caller: Lisette Lambregts ' / . '• '• . . ..'. .!. .
Subject: ' Petrpleura refining wkstc cpmbustiqn capacity and inconsistencies between
API and CKRC surviey results;. :. '.'•.'-'••.' ,' ..
Report of Discussion: .. •..; ;.- /' V" ^ .. .
Does not .recall speaking vC-ith"'API 6r Gossman,but uncertain, Uncertain whether
they accept F037 and F038 wastes. . ' .; . ;'' /,- "__
r|f
IS
i»
o. a *-•*
* O ** V*
III
':' ^
' , "O
. -/='. P
C3Q
" ' "-"' *'• .'.'' v> '•'. i" ' ",'•• ' •-'••'!
,'." ". .• ' -.•'• ; 'i '•'.• ,'"?/•;•*.' -:-- '• • • '. -
' • •'"•' -. '•'':~':' ? •"'-.•!.?:•' .-•':'.-.'
-------
-------
•'.C-26''. '.. '..,
.INCINERATOR
FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION
'•_.'.. -f' /,• -i'" ••-' :**•''.
'•'• '• . ,. .:,•'':!" '• . '•'-
'''•^fj&/\{f?i
fi-S
* a
'.-Sly
to
hcj
.O--
o.
U).
-------
-------
Cbmact: Shaun.Rdoke, Waste Approval Manager . . .
Incinerator: Aptus, Kansas. .'".'• .- •
Location: Coffeyville," Kansas ....: : .; . • .
Phone: .<.'..' '(800)292-2558 •' ' '"•.'• • '''.'• - ';' "
Date: ',; 3 March 1992 ' . ." .-.! •'_" • . ". '/ . :
Caller: "• Prakash Ramaswaray •' . , "-;.."-' . . ' - - ::-p.
Report'of Discussion: _. " ...':.• ' .-'•.• - ': ', ' " •• ', '.'
Current status of facility to accept Ktlisted (K048-K052) and F-listed (F037,'F03S) petroleum
•refiningwastes: ''//•• .•''..'".'';' ' '••„ ' •• '-• •',•'". . .-.
', • • Mr. Rooke indicated that the facility is permitted to accept K048rK052;-F037,
'arid F038 wastes but is currently not accepting K048-K052 wastes due to
, ,' • ' cyanide treatment standards. ".The issue is not'a technical restriction .but'
.' , .rather'a management: decision. IWr. Rooke stated that F037/F038 wastes can
••' •. -. be accepted but .it.uiil depend bri cyanide concentration. •• '. .,..', " •
.Methock of shipment of K-listed petroieum refining wastes to facility: .. ... ;:
.•..'.' The facility is currently not accepting any K-listed petroleum refining wastes.-
I .' Mr. Rooke .noted that previous shipments of K-Iisted petroleum refining
wastes in^ roll-off bins were rejected dueI to free liquid in the- roll-off bins. .
• •*&!•!'
?•? H n O
• tt • •* _, W
a a..~ "
"- ° " »
•- '-sl'?-.
CQ
an
-------
\.
-------
'. ' ••"-;• -• •'• ' '' ' . './ c-2&. " '•- •'' ' ' • • '•'' - - '
'-. Contact: ' Sharia Barber, Manager of Environmental Planning •
'••- '. Incinerat6'r:: Aptus, Utah • ..'''; • - .' • ' . ' ' •
• .Location: Tooele, Utah • ,'. ...-;.. '.- .. . ' '.
' >: . Phone: (801)-521-9040•', , : •
. . Date: 5 March 1992; 6 April 1992. ''..' . :,"'.'. .
. •; Oilier: V Prakash Ramaswainy . ..,', ,' • . ' • . • '
Repon of .Discussion: • • -..-'." '"••••• '••' ; •' .; '
:'' • ..' . . This new. facility'is. presently conducting trial bums. The facility expects to complete
• ••.' .the trial bum process in May, 199Z. . "... '. '.
"". Current statusiof^^facility to accept K-listed (K048-K052) and F-listed (F037, F038) petroleum
refining wastes: . ' • ;.'..- :' ; •• x , " " -\
' .The facility can accept K048- K052 wastes but'it cannot accept F037 and F038 wastes. The
.;.,' issue is not a technical restriction but rather a permitting limitation. Ms. Barber hopes that
' , ;the facUity will be permitted to Accept F037/F038 by May 1992, but considers that an
. ' .'optimistic;estimate. ' . • •••. • \ • '• . . '' • i • : .
? Current methods of shipment of K-listed petroleum refining wastes to facility: ."-,-,
' .»:-Ms. Barber reported that-all K-listed petroleum refining wastes except one
;-. • • , •'-.". load have been shipped in roll-off bins. The exception was a pressure tanker
••:"'• which was rejected due to the sludgers viscosity. . .-''-..
• Frequency of-K-listed wastes being received by the facility: : .
': , ; . . • The facility .began burning waste on Dec. 16, 1991. The.facility is currently
1 . ... - • " accepting approximately-forty cubicyards per dayMH roll-off .bins. ,
Rejection rates of petroleum refining wastes'at facility:
.. , • * • Ms Barber reported'thai the one load of K-listed petroleum refining waste
. •..-'"«.. : .whichi was considered a-pumpablesludge was- rejected by 'the facility. The
. .' .1 , 40% water/ 60% sludge mixture w-as shipped in a pressure tanker. The,load
.'was rejected because the sludge portion had a viscosity greater than the 10,000
' .: •" . ' maximum centpotse operating limit of the.cement pump -used at the facility.
O. ft - «
'
.
K)
,^rj •
o; -.
•o .
-------
-------
.'•' .•••.''• . • :'" •• • '.'.-' ' •' C'29 '•'•:':,. . .-.'.-•' -•'' ' -.'
•• ]•' •• Ms. Barb'er reponed that the consistency of the dewatered K-listed petroleum".
• '•• •.. ' refining sludges has been amenable'id the.bulk solid feed system. . "'-'*'
Feed'systems at facility that currently, process of have-the ability'to process petroleum •
refining wastes: ' '. • - •..'''•'•'• • '- ' ' ' :-." .'. ••
•" • ' Purapable sludges: Ms Barber indicated that, pumpabie sludges with viscosities '
: ; ' . less than 10.000 centipbise can. be incinerated' as a pumpabie sludge.. •
'.." Pumpabie sludges pn be shipped in,bulk tankers. The waste does hot have
to be colloidal in nature, but any material settling put of solution must have. .
• -. • '"a viscosity less than 10,000 centpoise. :/ \ • •- . ..
''.'•' •.'= ''•.'••'. .'.-'.'."'• '" > •. - •••'.'. . ' • ;• "
. • -Bulk solids: Ms. Barber indicated that the apron feeder/ciamsriell system is
,. • . amenable to dewa:sved petroleum refining filtercakes.. ' ..' ' ..-''.'.
• " o. • — .Containerized Solids: Ms. Barber reported that petroleum refining wastes can
: ..^ ' " be processed at the facility: in containers. : She-indicated-there.;'are xno ' .
. -'" '-; operational or technical restricuons to incinerating K-Iisted petroleum refining
• '• .-'•.-."'.... sludges ini containerized .form. . "• '•" • ' . -.''_ • . .
Operating capacity of facility:. . . •/ . ... .' ". . ..-
'••••..•• Bulk Solids: The facility has burned up to 12,000 Ib/hr during trial burns, the
.;'"'''• ."'•', •'.' facility is considering negotiating with the-state to. change .-the current '.
. v' :. permitted rate of 10,000 Ib/rir, to 12,000 Ib/hr. Ms. Barber .indicated that the .'
' . ' facility can operate at this rate for 18 hours per day but she estimates that the
' .' facility will operate -13 hours/day when the facility becornes.fully operational. .
';. '-.• • ' "Containerized Solids: The facility is 'currently burning 20 55-gallpn drums-per. .
,''• i • ;.hour. Ms. Barber indicated that this facility will be able to burn containerized '
- solids at this^ rate' for 13 hours per day. when ;the-facility becomes, fully
•••..••-•'.•• .operational. . . . \ ' _• • .'• '_;• . ' '• '". •
• •. Pumpabie sludges: The .facility, is currently 'burning 5,000 Ib/hr... Ms.- Barber
-, . , '• estimates that the facility will be able to burn pumpabie sludges at this rate
• : :".;. for 13 hr/day when the facility becbmes fully operational..-., ' •'.
Other factors that coiiid affect a^ilable capacity: -, •.•..'"•".," '''_, '; . .
.• •: Storage space at the facility-is limited: to 12,000yd3 for bulk solids, and 35,000 ::
' -.'•' 'gallons for putnpable-sludges: !. • •', . -: .- .:. ] , •.!
3" "
s?
•»**•»_ w
'• & &, im-M
.. •• o » „ - •
^ '"'§"!».•
'O'
-o
C3
-------
-------
fl>«F«W™
IV
••'ii'.'.'-'•"••• ;s'-/'vv?.•:•»>' ';-V:''J-
••'-..' •• • c-3o; ; r, • "••.-. :.. • ••'•"'.,•
•Ms Barber indicated (hat because the facility is new, most of the problems' '• .<
that are; inhibiting, available capacity involve administrative aspects.of the
facility, i.e. waste profile review, lab sample turnaround, scheduling for slots, . ,
'etc. -.••••','• - ' .-.,'-•• -" V ''•'_. '""• •'
Ms.:Barber indicated that TSCA waste i.e; PCBS, will riot be make up a large
percentage of bulk solid wastestfeams accepted by the facility. Present market
conditions indicate that PGBs;will be shipped in liquids or containerized form. .. •
O
a
to
O
O
uo
o
CD
to
-------
-------
ll
. ••.Contact:' Sharla Barber; Manager of Environmental Planning .,•>.; ' • - ;
Incinerator: Apius, Utah '„. v . ' • ; ... .' . . - ' .'.
Location: -Tooele, Utah •' • ; ••...;•.:.' -.'/•.. , :" -•
Phone: : .(80.1) 521,9040 '. " ' • . - ' •/ ' ; '-.--.
Date: . 4 June 1992 . .•; .' \" . . '- ; • '. . •
Caller: '. Prakiash Ramaswamy .. . .
Report of Discussion: • ; • •' '•.. ''; \ ."•• '. -_. \ . '• •" . ... .
This new facility completed trial burns in May 1992;: The facility is expecting to
receive trial bum results in July .1992. - ' ' • . . \;
: Current status of facility to accept K-listed (k048^K052) and F-iisted (F037, F038) petroleum .
' refining wastes: : . • .• .-.' ' •_ <''V.' ''•••'•/. ' . • " .'"/"•
.'. , / • The facility can accept K048-K052 wastes but it cannot accept F037 and F038
•.'". • wastes'.',Msi-Barbet'indicated that a Class II modification, will be submitted
• . ; shortly in order to.add the newly listed petroleum.refining wasje.codesito the
- .; facility's permit. Ms Barber hopes that the"facility will be permitted to accept
.. '. ' F037/TO38 wastes by August 1992. ,-.. /. .. , •'
Frequency of K-iisted wastes being received by the:facility: ' (.
• • • •*,',• .'•'•'• t
• . • The facility is currently accepting approximately forty cubic yards per day in :
•. • roll-off bins. '•. • .,-. ' " . .-" .: . • ,:
Current and planned capacity'bf the facility:••'"-. .
..: - •• •-" Current arailable, utilized, and planned capacity has not .changed since
. . pre«ous discussions with Ms/Barber.'Ms. Barber indicated-that facility's
capacity, and any associated limitations will be dependent on trial burn results.
. Anticipated increase of newly-listed petroleum refining wastes received by facility: ...
! • The facility presently can not accept F037/F038 wastes. Ms. Barber indicated
. ,...•••'. that the facility is not planning to reserve capacity for F037/F038 wastes when
v ' " the facility becomes.permitted to bum those wastes:. . •-' , •••
' 8'-" a-
o,"
- n'
• o
to
: ^cj
•''''•• O
. -o
Ui
-------
-------
yapaftyS'
"••.-. .; ••- '-• • .•' , .. c-32 ..... •' •.'•' •
; • ' •• - ' :'••• •' • • -. ••••• . .••• •.-.".'••
.Contact: . Mark Gynn " . • , ••'-.•%'". • -•'.'''
Company: , Chemical Waste Management . . • . '•.-'".-•
..Location:, Oak Brook, Illinois •". • • • . ' .
•Phone: ' (708)218-1749 - . . •:.. •'
Date: 6 March, 1992 .. . . . ' -
Caller*
Pra'kash'Ramaswamy
. . - . - . . -
Report of Discussion: • •.'••••, • . ' ' ••"
- • - - ;Mr. Gynh beUeves that there is not enough nationwide 'treatment capacity for
F037/F038 wastes. He indicated thatF037-F038 wastes will have a lower heat content value
than the minimum usually required for fuel blenders. .-Mr. Gynn provided a .list of fuel
'blending facilities that .have -sludge/solid processing capability. The facilities, are
GSX/Laidlaw, USPCI,. and Safety KJeen. Mr." Gynn confinned current management
^practices of facilities within the CWM system that could process/treat wastes that have
physical characteristics similar to F037/F038 wastes. . ' • ; •• ' .
K048-K052 wastes are currently processed in brie of two ways: -, : ..-•'.
: • , Pumpable sludges (in containerized form) are. shipped; processed^ and
• •""•.',_ repacked into burnable containers at CWM, (Emelle, Alabama). Repackaged'
; . ; wastes are then shipped to either CWM, Sauget, Jilihpis (TW1) or CWM, Port
-•', ' .'"" / •Arthur, Texas. '• . -• ." ' ',. •" '. ,'. ,. . .. '.-•'''• '.'" •' '•
; • Bulk solids with low heat content, water content, and high solids content can
" . be shipped 'directly to CWM, Port Arthur, Texas.- ."• .', ,
' ?»?
•••€-£•
•-la?
ES _ rt 6>"^
*3 r* <| n 5T
* ? ». (» O.
•»' *• — u. W
. O. 0. .- «
3^
a
o
,
OJ
-------
-------
Contact:
Darreli Lentr
Company: • Rhohe-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Co. ...... • . ' ' ' '._•-. ..'"•-'
- Phone:-' " 504-359-3735 '.--•' ' : ' ' ;.; .. •'...'' ; '.;:/• "• •' '.,
Date:'', ' 27 February, 92 ... -'-'•• • : '
'Caller:- Gary Light ^ .~. • ... ' .. ';. ' ..
.Subject: .. Petroleum Refining Waste. Management at Rhqne-Poulenc{RP) '.•-:/.' ' ' -•
. . Report of Conversation: • . ,_ : : '•".'• ' .; . ." . . : .. " '. ' .
Current Management of KQ48-52. ., ,. ' ;. . .... ;
: ( RP's Baton Rouge, plant currently receives K048-52 from 3 major refineries, and is .-,
. '. • in the process of approving waste profiles for several additional refineries.' Some DAF float ..,...'
• (JC048) is also carrying the F037/38 codes.. The-Baton Roiige plant received 14,000 tons of ",
petroleum refining wastes in 1991,' which it incinerated as pumpable sludge. The facility 'did
see an increase in the second half of 1991,but it was not due to new waste generation. The.
'increase• came from a contract for.a waste stream that had been, going.to another ' ..•'
commercial treatment facility; • ( ... . . . . , . :. .: • ..-'-'
Market Factors . ..;. ."•""-.. '•-;•". .'•;'-.•.' x •. '-. • .••.. --'.: • '.•••'-. '•'=:-''
By the end of 1992, RP expects to see deciines in the amount of petroleumi wastes ."•.:.•-•-
'. it receives as' it loses customers toon-site thermal drying and delisting. -RP also anticipates '" .
• •• more petroleum refiningsludges going to' cement kilns. This facility has seen wide variability-- ': v
. in the heating value of petroleum refining wastes, and noted that cement kitns often rely on ' .',
. "cutttag1* the sludges .with higher, heating value wastes to ehVure a consistent.mix. Blenders . '
V play a key role in this process, and RP is aware of cases where winter shutdowns at cement ;
kilns have caused delays for waste-generators. • .. , .. • . •.; . .. "..'.
Capacity for F037/38 > - :v: . ..• .•'-..' . ': . . ,;
". • -. ' ^ -' , . . . ' ' ' .-.'•. . ' . . ; »•-_'. -.'•...
.;, RP's'Baton; Rouge facility is limited; by'its storage capacity. Under current .- ••
l'r constraints, the Baton Rouge facility could accept about one third more petroleum refining . '/ .
: wastcs-'than it is currently receiving; -The facility plans to complete a 157,000-gallbn tank in
October 1992. This^tanJcwiU^greatly increase the facilities (practical throughput capacity. . .
t
a x Z -tt
S
• c - »
" g"
Q
-O
'O'
-------
-------
• ,>•• • r •. , ' ..'">•'•
" ' ><••*: . *• "' •'-*••
,,**-•
.Contact: Rusty Dunn, Waste Approval Manager ,
Incinerator:. Rollins . .
Location: Deer Park, Texas '-. './..'..""
• ' Phone: .(713)930-2420 . • ' : •
'..'•-. Date: 4 March 1992,9 March 1992 .. . ' , . . ".
Caller: ' - Prakash Raraaswamy > . , • ; . : .'.',.
• Report of Discussion:" ' . . .• . .- : ..;.', . ,
Current status of facility to accept K-listed (K048tK052) and F-listed (F037, F038) petrcleum
-, refining wastes: • •.• '" --,'.- ' . ".- . •_ ..!. • •-.''•. • .'• . '. •• . ..-' ' •
] '' •'• • • The facility, is permitted to accept K048-K652, F037, andF038^^ wastes.
.Current methods of shipment of K-listed wastes received by facility: '..'-•...
> . •' Currently95%of petroleum refining wastes are being shipped.in roll-off bins.. ..'.
. •'*He stated that dewatered K-Usted sludges have a "crumbly" not a "tacky" ..
, ••'/..•' •"' 'consistency.',. .•,.;/ ' ' • . •• ,".. . • - -.' " • : " . .-.
.. . • Mr, Dunn indicated that'lcss than 5% of K048-K052 wastes 'are shipped in .
• . .' _ ' ^ntainers.' ..,:'•_.•'•'•''. : ;• • : .. .-"'•' .' •' .•• - ", . ;
' Rejection;rates of k-listcd.wastes shipped to facility:.. . . ,.
. • '•• Mr. Dunn could not report rejection rates for .the facility. .: • .
.Frequency of,petroleum refining wastes received by facility: . ;
• /The facility regularly accepts K-listed petroleum refining waste. Mr. Dunn did ,
; , ;: not see an increase of K048-K052 wastes .being shipped to the 'facility during
; ... ; the second half oH991. \ : . •- •. ': . ,. . • .
: Feed .systems at facility that currently process or have the ability to process petroleum
refining wastes: ..• ' '..-.; ";•• . . . - •: .• V -•
' • Pumpable. sludge: Mr .Diinn indicated that dewatered filtercakes are not
amenable to-the| facility's puriipable sludge system. " , ;
..
.« o 2-q
••» ;*ff * 2
C ~ r> « •;
•* » -« 0
'
-------
-------
t
«!§•• '-
.i5-l£: '
Bulk solids: Mr.'Dunn reported that to be amenable to the bulk feed system..
wastes should have a water content less thari 40% and a heat content less than
5^000 BJU/lb. He indicated that K048-K052 wastes that have, been shipped
have met ihese,cnteria; He indicated the focility.can add drying agents to the
waste to decrease moisture content, but ihis'has not been required for.K-listed
petroleum refining wastes* Bulk solids at the facility are processed exclusively
; through the rotary reactor. .The facility is currently processing 90 cubic yards'
(three 30 cubic yard bins) per day: Mr. Dunn indicated that the facility can
process 150'cubic'yards per day under current storage capacity limitations of
100 roU^ff bins. According to Mr. Dunn, current available capacity, is 20 roll:
• off bins: '••.-•'. " ' ' : • .,•••:• -. "' ",.•
Containerized solids: Mr. Dunn reported thai.there is no technical restriction
>for incinerating K-iisted petroleum refining wastes.at the facility. Mr. Dunn
reported that currently one-third of container throughput -capacity is being'
utilized. Storage capacity for containers is 25,000 drums. Mr. Dunn did not
provide available.capacity for ccmtainer storage: • •. '-, .• -' '" • ..
'• Npnputnpable sludges: Mr. Dunn indicated that ribnpumpable sludges.fqr this
:'facility should,have been distributed between containerized solids and bulk
solids in EPA's capacity analysis. He believes that for treatmerit,tram'#.i. all
nonpumpable sludge-capacity should have been.classified as.containerized"
solids capacity. ,For train #2, .nonpumpable sludge capacity should have been
distributed evenly between .containerized.solids capacity and bulk solids
'capacity. .; " /.. ', .. . ' ' '. • :,",-.. '. • • '
« .a
. e rr «
"O
^ ^^'
to
-------
-------
-Contact: Mr. Rusty Dunn . v . . . .'. .
Incinerator: Rollins Environmental Services (TX) Incorporated : "
Phone: (713) 930-2420 . : . . ,
Date: 20 May 1992 . ;. ; • , \ ...;'' ...-. V
. Caller:.' Gary Light. • . ' ' - , . ' ..'••':•-.
.Subject: .. Incineration capacity for F037/F038 . :. ,., '.;••' - . ,
; . , Mr. Dunn indicated that the Deer Park facility is currently receiving a significant
quantities of K04S-52, and that the rotary reactor system is largely dedicated to these wastes.
•' .Mr. Dunn provided the following information regarding the facility's capacity for petroleum
refining sludges including F037 and F038: > ,
' • The rotary reactor is.limited to 331 million BTUs -per hour; '•'..'''•' :'
• , The average heating value of ICONS'to K052 wastes received at the facility is .
. - somewhere in the area or 3,000 to 4,000 BTUs per pound; J•''•••• '.-'••. •
. : ..'•' '•; The rotary reactor is operational 85 percent of the time on average; • • '
5 z
= « 9
ft * *
a M 5?
The facility currently receives about 3 roll-off bins of K048-52 per day, and
each 30 yard bin contains roughly 20 tons of waste; . . ,. ,
. Under current storage limitations, the facility could receive an average of 5
• roll-off bins per day; • - ' ' .•''.' •'.' • .,.-'.
.The only.reason the facility would reject additional R048-52 would be if a .
particular waste contained very high metals levels (e.g., thousands of parts per '
million of lead, arsenic, or chromium). Mr Dunn could not estimate jhe
fraction of petroleum refining wastes that are currently rejected; , . . :'--',
.'• The facility also has the capacity to re package, wastes iiito drums on site to.;
feed them to one of the two rotary kilns;. _ ' ..
• The two rotary kilns currently operate in slagging mode, but could be run in
•' non-slagging mode and 50 percent dedicated to petroleum refining sludges-if
warranted by demand. Such a change would add jroughty 4,000 pounds per ...
hour:qf capacity for F037 and F038, but wbuld.displace other wastes;; , . . ,.
'• The facility is'taking new customers and was planning to shutdown the rotary
n
o
o
-------
-------
C-37
•'' - reactor over Memorial Day Weekend due to a lack of waste.
•« o1 8 jo
P - " " 2
c 5 n « "
:5'-US'
•. CL a. M
K)
•^
•.o
O
•'-'.•.'•"•''> - OV'.'v"V '
Cn
\
-------
-------
.t
. - • ' ' r* -ao .. • • . ' '•
• - -" • . ' - ' t- - JO . . : • ' .• ••','.-
Contact: . Eric Chokan • '. . \'.• '•'".... .
.Incinerator: Ross Incineration . : . . • - '
Location: '• Graftori, Ohio . ! , • .; . . _ •' .'
.-•Phone:/- . (21(5)748-2172 . , •'"••'. . . :. '•' —
. Date: :; 11 March 1992 , " .-'.-;
Caller "• • Prakash Ramas*-amy . . '... ;
."•'• Report of Discussion: ' . , •• • . ,. , . '. " . .
Current status of facility to accept K-lisicd (K048^K052) and F-listed (F037, lr03S) petroleum
. ' ; refining wastes: " ' '..'• • ' 1% .• - '•.' '; ••• '. " •'
•.,-. ,; ^ ;: ' The facility can accept K-listed (K048-K052) wastes and F-listed (F037, F038)
-. •'• '.-'•' •' ••'",;wastes. ,'. , ' '. •.'. ,-.' '• •'• '' .. -•. . '"-''. .-.-. • ''
.;• Current methods of shipment of K-listed wastes received by facility: •.' r .-,'[•' '.' :-'
'• . ..'•.••- The company received K-!isted wastes in 1991. in bulk solids form. •••' . • .. •
' Frequency of petroleuni refining wastes received by facility: -.•.:'•; >• •' ' ••
: •• " .The facility began receiving K-listed.petroleum refining wastes during the
surhmer of 1991. Puring the second half of 1991, the volumes'of. IC-listcd
' .. ..' • '•' • shipped to the facility decreased, due .to increased competition from the
. cement kiln industry. '- '•• '• • .-,-'•.. '' >' .•'
, Capacity: A replacement kiln came on-line in December 1991. Maximum and available
•' : capacity estimates for the replacement kiln were 'not readily available,'but Mr. Chokan1
offered to provide maxunutn and available capacity estimates at a later date. '
vn., .
. Q-. v
^•••o.
• '.O
OJ
w'-J
• *-' -'f5-vt>,-.\>' * •"'
•'• . -"->:'Xr'->"-^---'.'j. '/ -/ -•' •.' • ' •
•-' ''" " - ' '• '
-------
-------
i
Contact: , AJJ'agano '•'.'• ;'";• -' : .. ' • .
Company: • Dupont Chambers 'Works. •'•-,''"'• •. . - .
Phone:. "(609)540-4106 ;: . '; "• : . . ~ :.'
;Datc: 5-March; 1992 '. '-• . ; . . ; ... : - ; • :"•
: Callcn Lisettc Lambregts ... . • " ... . ' .
•'Subject: . . F039 (leachate) treatment'• ,... • .' r . .
.Report of Discussion:'.•;•. "-, . '•'.' • . . , .; ',' - .....'..f
' They generate' and,receive'multi-source leachate (F039) sludges and solids from 'Offsite.'
After the,variance expires May 8, 1992 they intend tq-biirn it in an on-site incinerator.
He did caution that if anything happens to the-incinerator, they may need to store the waste"
temporarily, or even send it off site. Currently ihe incinerator is working fine, and they .are .
.' not planning to ship F039 sludges and sblidsrtb commercial combustion facilities' after the
'• variance expires;"; • -.•••'' '•'•-•,.'.'• '. •• •' ; • ' ,' ..-.' "''...
'"" ''''
= x ? z
»• o 2 s-o
S-sSfiR
S---1S.
a. a. — «• '
: 8 Iff
e** M * '
ff ** -- -
» §"
• 2 - C.
• 5 o ff- •
. "o
. O1-
' ts>
-, • l"rl-
'• o •
o •
-------
-------
„
>L
' .' ' '.".-' • ',-..'..' C-40; . ' ' ". ..••--.'
Contact: '.'- Mark Moses . .- • . '.'..-'.' ',. • J '.
-Company: GE Waterford ".. ' ....
Phone: ,(518) 233-2254 • ' .-•'_• .' '.. '., ; .
Date: 3 March, 1992, . .' :
•• • • .' • • ' . * ' ••'
Caller: '•' Lisette Lambregts . ' . . ;•
Subject: . F039 (leachate) treatment ' "' •.; ' . .:
. Report of Discussion: «. : .
They do not like to respond to phone surveys, but he did indicate that the expiration of the
variance will riot affect .them. , . . • ' : • . • . . -.- . ,
•III
•ItJI.
" a = « 2
a • o.B-1^
O. o. — ft
• O ** 'i'j
o -••» .
. • e f «• • .
•-£ "
/ -
•O
D
K)
O
O
u>
CO
-------
-------
-Contact:. JeriyHoppee ... . . :
Company: Chemical Waste Management, C1D Landfill,
Phone: ((312)646,6666 .•••"_. . . . /-y ;
' Date:. 3 March, 1992 " ,' •
Caller: Lisette Lambregts . : '.'. . :
. Subject: F039 (leachate) treaunent
:, Report of Discussion: -- . ; . ' .:
They have not received any F039.s!udges and solids in the lasvyear.
w O S JO
>.*« 2 S
C 2' rt •» J?
' B ?'-.•» 2
• n ™ •» •„ ro
fr & M>'«* '.
' P » ~
- . ». .
o
• b«*w •
to
-o
o
03
C3
-------
-------
r
r
: **s-
•'.-Contact: • Roger Fuchs "•'.-. . . . •'• .<,' •-. • - ' r.. .' •
- Company: -Chemical Waste Management, CID Landfill f • '•'
*..'•; • •'. '., •" .' ' • ':•''".' • -'. '• '.' . ' '
. Phone: , •' (312)646-6660 ;.''"• .
' . .'. Date:. . 9'March, :1992'. . . . .. . -. ' .'' .. ..
.Caller: Lisette Lambregts : •• •••/• •'•••' • . ••'•''••'
Subject: '. F039 generation and management ..';... ' '. ..'. • '. • .'
•• Report of Discussion:. ..'-.. •'. , ' .• • •"•"..''. • . '• : •• ...
v.. ' After the expiration of the multi-source leachate variance on.8.May 1992,'.they will
treat F039 sludges and solids on site through lime stabilization and sludge drying. Sludges
•' , ,': '\Mllriotgo6ffsiterandwllnotrequire.coramercialcbmbusti6ncapacity: -:
n-• o
O
a-
K)
o.
o;
y^P^'s^
qb
-------
-------
.1- -
C-43
INTERMEDIATE PROCESSORS
'FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION
'a a- 2
n n> 2
C " " S
to
.»rj
••o'
O.
OJ
'.y/•?'...•<'.$:.«vV ,'
-^^.'^."•V,
-------
-------
• , C-44 , ..; . ,.
ONE MARINE DRIVE.'..yiCHIOAN CITY. INDIANA 4<,-60
'May 3, 1990
t± ~ -a M X
'-Jff
Hr., William K. Reilly . . ' ' -
Administrator • • . . • .'-, "• '. '
U.S.; Environmental Protection Agency =-..'. .-..*•
401 K Street, S.W.' ':''''' ' ' '• ' . -.'• :;' - "; •'
'Washington, D.C. 20460 . ' . . .''••• . :
. Dear Hr. Heillys. ''• " '"'__, '._:-•."''.• • ' • ' •'" ' ..-. ' ' .•', ' . . ':„'••: ' /. ,
•'•, We are most disturbed by Don 8. Clay's nemo .of April 24,
1990 regarding"the "Third Third Final.Ruler for,the RCRA land
ban. We understand you intend to sign the final rule no later '
•'than May 's. '• ;...• •'•-'• ''. •'•• ''..-....- • • . • • :.•''•.
. , Our basic problem is with, the last paragraph of the memo.
Mr. Clay announces his intent to Trecomkend a one-year,national
capacity variance for all K048-52 wastes. He states: "Our
analysis indicates that there, is currently inadequate treatment
capacity for generated K048-52 waste's."' .. - .•;.•, , ":.
As May 8 is only a few days away,.we must .urgently call'your
attention to the fact that there is currently available treatnent
:capacity for a significant portion of .this waste, and that more '
..treatment capacity will .soon b« available. We strongly urge you.
to consider this' information in making your 'final decision. /
• ', Cadence has developed and patented technologies, for '. '• . . .
recycling hazardous waste fuel (HWP) for use in-cement kilns. ..
(See attached patent.) Along with cement companies such as Ash
Grove. Cement Company and.Southdown, Inc.', we have several.HWF>..
burning projects'now'fully underway and several more coming, on-
linein-th«.next few-montha.:. , ... \ ;_ " ,/'•;;
Unlike others who manage KWF for cement kilns, our patented .
technology -involves the use of "solid" . (non-puapable) HWF. We. .
have kept EPA personnel closely informed of developments in the
solids area, 'and EPA has obtained extensive.stack .test data, from
our/cement kilns, both from EPA1s testing and our own which
clearly,show the. environmental integrity of'our process. Many
K048-52 waste streams are readily usable as solid HWF in
facilities using the cadence technology. . • '• ;
UADINGTHE NATION INORGASJC-HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING TECHNOLOGY•
O
"'a
o
U)
CO
tj
-------
-------
C - 45
We have.commented extensively'oh your-pending .proposals'
.relating both to industrial .furnace burning and to the "Third
Third..". In those consents, we have'submitted extensive ''-.. . ..
• documentation of. the. efficacy of our process. Based on. data' we
'.•and others have submitted, -EPA has.found.-that.cement kilns are • '.
"ideally suited" devices to burn HHF. 52 Fed. Reg. I698b. May's,
":. 19187. . ' : _ .•'•"''.'.' '•'••'. " • ' -•'-•'• .'•'' ' "
•' . In: the past, availability of. cement kiln HWF capacity'has
been a'key factor in EPA'3 decision not to grant national
capacity variances for:certain wastes.(such as'"California list' '
HOCs"). EPA also, specif led "fuel substitution" as-. BOAT for '
several waste codes in tha "Third Third" proposal, arid EPA .
personnel have made clear .'to us that this was done'in'large part ,
•;• -.to'avoid'granting national capacity variance's. . ' .. •
Thus'; EPA's. consistent policy has been to fully-consider '
cement kiln .capacity:before granting .national capacity variances,
and we: fear that Mr. Clay's recommendation is a clear departure '•
from this policy. .The result will be that ---contrary to' '•
• congressional and agency .policy — large volumes of wastes'will
go untreated;before land disposal even though.the treatment
, capacity.for such'wastes exist; . ' • ' " ' ,' ' :, ' • '
Before turning to the specifics :of our capacity,'I should •
note that wo must alert 'you to a few basic legal concerns-over :.
Mr.. Clay's recommendation. First,- EPA never proposed to grant,a
.-'blanket national capacity extension for K048^52 wastes, it '•
. proposed an extension only for those constituents for which EPA .
was proposing more stringent BOAT controls than specified in the
- First Third. In fact, because of some confusion in the Third-
.Third preamble in this respect f5« Fed. Rea. 48472). our- ••-....
.representative contacted Ms.. Bassi, the .EPA "national- capacity" .
contact/listed,in the preamble. .She explained quite clearly on ,
February 23 that EPA wa'». not proposing an extension with'respect
to. the unchanged standards.. '.' ' " ' ..'. ••_'" '.' ''".'" : ..
Second, we believe EPA is without authority to 'rmove" waste-
codes from the First, to the Third .Third once final standards have
.been set for them. EPA certainly did not propose to do this. In
fact, in a'discussion on an analogous.situation in the Third .
Third proposed preamble, EPA stated: .-^Any other interpretation
would.result in EPA1s extending the date: of a prohibition beyond
the dates established by congress, and" therefore beyond EPA1s
legal authority." 54 Fed. Reg. 48489. - . .>.
- .. • As to Mr. Clay's key assumption -^ a lacJc of .capacity— we
. can offer the following information for your consideration. Ash
• Grove currently"has available a maximum annual capacity .to.accept
t 0. 'IP^ **
.o- " «
0 .«. n
,,.lfS-..-.
: O'
-------
-------
C-46
105,000 tons of K048-K052 wastes'.' This capacity exists at the
following authorized and operating 'Ash Grove kilns: -
Foreman, Arkansas facility' . • , .
' , - ,.: Kiln '#2- '22,000 tons - .....
v; , •, Kiln #3 .22, ooq- tons . '- . ;'• •
. . •' Chanute, Kansas facility • •''•."• '• •
-Kiln #1 26,000 tons .. ,. . -,-•'. •
'• ', Kiln t2 26,000-tons
Louisville, Nebraska facility ' . . - , .
': ' Kiln Hun ' 10,000 tons . . '
Kiln ACL . .26, 000 .tons . . ' . ., . '. :
(Of this total capacityrof 132,000 tons, only 27,000 tons are
currently, being used,, leaving 105,000 tons currently available.')
in' addition to the Ash Crovo 'kilns, -Southdown is in -the.. -
final stages, of authorization for two kilns located' in •
'Louisville, Kentucky and.Knoxville, Tennessee. • Each is expected
to be operating by August, 1990. The 'Louisville kiln wiil'haye.a
maximum annual capacity of 26,004 tons;, and the Knoxville kiln a
capacity of 7C-,000 tons. Together they will add another 96,000
.tons af annual capacity.. ''.Thus', 'the .combined makiaum capacity .
that will be available by August, 1990 is 201,000 tons. ' .; '
.Both Ash Grove- and Southdown are' also in the process of '
retrofitting facilities 'or seeking necessary, approvals to burn" .
HWF at additional facilities. It is anticipated that in 1991 an
additional 131,000 tons of capacity will become available .at the
following 'facilities: . ' . ." •.. '. '.••.',•" ' •
to
^d
o
O
In pur. January 8, 1990 eomkents on -the Third Third. ' •
-regylations we indicated that 90;,000 .tons of annual
capacity existed for solids energy recovery. , That
estimate did not include the Louisville ACL kiln that
has since cone on-line. Also, modifications to the
solids feed aeehanism have-allowed kilns to increase .
the-rate of admitting solids, thereby increasing
capacity. • '- ; •'-.''• ' . ' "•"..'' . .
'.•'l^-"i!:;••?:!'\.'...•' '.:''fi 4' ••"
-------
-------
C-47
Ash -Grove , /
Foreman, Arkansas , ; .
•' ,..' -,""• . Kiln •«- 26^000'tons
. southdown • > ~:~ , '•• ..'-. '..'• '
•. .Fairborn, Ohio 27,000 tons
Odessa; Texas 26,000 tons
'I**'
rlif
ilisf
*- £ f* " «
• ? _o D
.
2-- 2.
: S o Sf
3rd Licensee*
52,000 tons.
*
.
He are aware'that past EPA studies have assumed a need for
as much a's 600,000 tons of capacity'per year. •• However,, our .
'analysts demonstrates jehat the total .quantity of such wastes /
generated is actually about.350,000-400,000 tons annually'. .
. ' Our numbers are based on a survey of K048-K052 wastes • ''
undertaken by Cadence in January 1990 tip determine how many of v.
these wastes are capable of'being used for energy recovery. One
. hundred fifteen.(115) of the 181 active'refineries in the .United •'
States responded with-data on volumes of K048-K052 hazardous ,
wastes generated, dewatering processes employed, and disposal
, options used. Our anaJ;sis of this current data indicates that ,
'past EPA esjtimatesfligiiificantly over-estimate the amount of
.waste generated and thus,.the treatment capacity needed*- We
believe the current reduction in the total quantity of wastes -.
generated is the result of several :factors, .including a reduction
in,the number of .refineries.'now.operating, more widespread use.of
modern' dewatering techniques, and waste minimization efforts by <
the refineries. . •'• ". . , ,.•'.'.' • . • ' '._ ' :
Since heat content is an 'important consideration in the'use
of any fuel source, Cadence-analyzed .samples received from 22 '
refineriesiat the 5000 .Btu level, since this is a commonly used .,
minimum level when .evaluating wastes for. energy recovery . "
applications.. Our analysis shows that 25-30* of these K048-K052
wastes are above 5000 Btu peri pound and thus, can be used for ..
energy recovery, in cenent kilns. . . - . ._''._ .
In addition, by: modifying current dewatering techniques to .-,
eliminate the use of filter aids, filter cakes in the 4000-4500
Btu/pound range could be increased to 5000-5500 Btu/pound. • Our
O
O
O
CO
Active negotiations are underway to license an
additional coapany, currently permitted to receive HWF
fuel, .to use the Cadence patent for.burning solid. HWF..
-------
-------
f
C-48
.current-evaluation indicates that .such changes could make an
.'additional''20-25%; of K048-KOS2 wastes, available for use in energy
recovery. '~: J. -.-''.'. "•''..•• •_.'•' ' •.. .., • /. "
; In sum, it appears that of the 350;;oob-400,000 tons of K048-
K052 wastes currently generated, an estimated 125,000 .to 175,000
'tons could be used for'energy'recovery with Cadence's technology.
And as demonstrated above, .available capacity exists to handle
•.these wastes. • . ' '-" . • .'. >'•" ' •' ' "••'.•-
• • 'YOU may .note frOB the data supplied above-'that'some: of our
capacity is not currently available, but is projected to become
' available within -the'next six months. This .should not be a
problem, as all generators of these wastes can store on-site for
90 days even if they are hot RCRAT/S/D facilities. For those.
. that 'are T/S/D facilities','they may. store on-site 'for up to one •
'•• year if they are. accumulating for valid land .bah treatment.
: : . At the very least our data suggest that a one-year extension
is wholly .unwarranted. In light of the fact that.we have
capacity on-line now and. will'have additional-capacity.'on-line in
six months, we urge as an alternative, that only a 6-month" :' .-
extension be granted. Although_we believe our start-up
projections to be accurate; CPf•'would .always have the discretion
to grant further variance's if wur-projections prove incorrect.
EPA has previously recognized that this approach, is nore
consistent with congressional intent to ban land disposal at the
earliest possible time'. (See 51 Fed. Reo. 1693. column 2,
January 14, 1986.) : ', . . ; , .
• Finally, at a minimua EPA must exclude-from any national •
capacity variance petroleua refining .wastes, capable of'being used'
for energy recovery. Our "data clearly demonstrate adequate .
existing capacity for .these wastes. As EPA itself .stated in the
preamble to the Third Third regulations ."there is.clearly.no •
reason to grant national capacity variances-when EPA can define a
reasonable subcategory.for prohibited wastes for which there ' .
exists treatment capacity." • f54 Fed. Rea. 46474. column.3.) In
'excluding K048-K052 wastes capable'of being, used for energy /
recovery froa any national variance .EPA should consider the need
to discourage.practices designed .to lower the Btu content so as
to make these wastes unusable for energy recovery. • :. -
a
O-
.o-
U)
QQ'
-------
-------
.' ..Thanie you for your consideration'oC these comments.
.. . '• . Veryjtruly yours.
. Theodore^a. Reese
President- •.
O
o
o
CO
-------
-------
C-50.
United States, Pa tent
Btnoll tt aL- ' , ' •. , '•
im
[ill
(«>!'
Puent Number
Dtte of Patent:
4,850,290
Jul. 2S, 1989
»rcovT«Y ntoM
pjr tovtSBF'.MicW *. Emit. Grant R.L; Cite
,. lt.HiMn.Sluwici.ICut:
Tinton J. RMH. Midupa Ciy. \
••' • • .lint '..' ., . '
.{TJJ Aui|nca; Art Cr»»i CIOMM Caa»ur. •
•; Ovtrtuid Put Kiau O4*>« '
Pit
.{tfj
I?'!
f. U,lftt
uxa...
.' roc intf
< 311.IJ)
. 4)is.Jiz wit ji|L« .
'. 4)11.711 i/ltll tltttH.
. . 4 JM.KM ^ItlJ Yo.nj .
• )lf.J«: t/111) iiurtiiL
• i.fl».*«J l^lfl) FxrIMWi
,' OTHER PUBLICATIONS
."Kuirtoui WU|< u Supplcm«(iiil Fml for Ctmm
Kilni", Trttn. Hiipra. in4 Oitdteurn*. Proc..N»a
' wuit Pnecn Cenf.. IJiH. 1»1*. ' . .
I HuMeiu Wuit in C*mtnl Kilni".- Oitd-
i ind Hciirj«ii/l«17 Cwrtuau. '
]/itn ptw«i.
' ll/IIM Jimn ti it . •
frtntrf £umi*tr— Ejjwud O. Fivon :
t"J:.. -' • ABCTJUCT' . . , ' "'• '.
. A mnhod ndncnbtd tot tfivironirtnully wund ui>|i
of combmublt huiroeut wuti ia tn op*nn)if rbiwy
kiln. The niftkod i» p4«tcul»rty i4*pibo«t |]M'.C le
uhitvt rtifh iJniructioB tnd removil tfltatucict.'
10
14
.•»jw:-v'
-------
-------
C-51.
•UJ0.290.
: METHOD FOR EMRGY RECOVTRY FROM •
.. ••" SOUD HAZARDOUS WASTE ' •'-:
.-'• . HELD Of THE INVENTION v
TH'e proeat invention, relates te «M ef haiardaui
.weua ui reury talc*. More particularly. Utn invention
. a directed to i twined for aceempliihiiii envmnmen.
lloniin'lnefonnirl|clinker ud tdveruty'i/TccI cimeni
qulhty. '• '. .' . _• ' . |. ' • .,•' -. '•" ' •
•, Before pran'
Mliiuiu, it »u i'pnctice to ctwr|c «embmuble iana
wute into the cold end of ike kiln with ih< lo-be-p'oc.
cu«d mirunl miteniU. Such pricuca continue in
caunina where ernuiioa.iundirdt t>< liot w effect or
'not enforced. Todty. hov/ever. without idded etpen-
coinbuMiMc wawt lelidi ud the rei
enef|y>alua la mineral proeeaHM Wna,.
' BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE
.. '•- .'..-• INVENTION - ..' • '-..
. Solid con-omtible wwtet hive elwiri been |e«e>ued
by induairy. Muy of lueh wuus. became iliryto provide ftvoraM* cohditiani '
Tor the caenucal cocbuuuon of inorctmc mduainto
the leave compound* of ponltad cemeat-iueh optre-
' noni provide ideal eoedmees for ravrroaroenul wund
dueoul ef c'omlwniM* h«Tiirinni wwse miteruU.
. However, beciuw of prooleau tnbqi»e w UK hu<
4hn| ud burntei of lalid hiurdoo wute ia apenan|
Uu-riiulinMcomBliiiudtipoinlo/huiraawuiri 4,
kiln tnd tull ellaw the Wo te eperiie c
•with environmental re(uliuani controllinf kiln cmi».
uou. Cootbiuuil* ulid huirdoui wute by atfinnion
cw contain « wide run of voluile e<|uic nibuutcci.
Cbnbuuible huirdaut wute.iolidi. tdded wiih ike
. /i" nutcnil to the "cold" or upper end of i.coavcn- •
nonil kilA, 'without coobultioii fii ifterburnert or
Other imiuton control equipment, retulu ui luitccepi.
able levin of hydrocarbon cmiutani. Ai the riw mite.
nil ud wane ulidi n»ve down the kiln cylinder u
higher ud hither umpentui* tout, voluile compo-
neau are driven off into the effluent |ua it tempen-
turn below thote required for thermal dctrediuoii of
the volaiaiied campencati. The mult u aiKlur|« of i
ninificul tmcwni of to* votalile coApaundt into lite
.unoiphcrc. Pamculaie residue fuelt with low veleitlei •
conunt can be added either to the raui'eril nutthal
introduced u die cold end afd» kiln aria the ctlcmini •
tone with efficient cneriy **jut ""I* >l« w
• with little or ne modification ef kiln btmcr coafi|«r»>.
tian. Solid hiiirdouc wutt*. howcvtr. ct* 'eccur « t.'
.midiipUcuy of fora*, from hard oymlliec wlidi 10
.
v,«wi.iueky«h»d(e»,Tbeyu««|wflaMemtiM*ratdn!la|al'»rtlMir „
«fe hudliaf ud ddmrr i«« ree»r» kita. Further.,
ih« b«m»« of tuahiaitU t»Ud» « tt« «ra» chupber
of,» tata fine ether prtctictt proWeaa. Huvaoui-
'. «ute wfid* in tot catty dbpened ion the fume of .
the biinui| phatiry tiHk tfwwte *aUd» tt* chir|td iy elinkw. bath »termi of color'
.ind eerfornuae*. liut euditi>i condioau be m«»-'(i
• 'u«wdi*ihe«Ur«ke>>foraiin(ioaeoi'Dtekil«.Chiriin|.
conbutnble MiWl oew ihi fermiiil dialer ti ti rnperi- .
. tura'in eiceu of I HO* C cut crciie rMu«m| cor>4i>
wuu handtinf.plant tnimetr -|. end-
product quality and emuiton control hu del rrrd kiln
operuora freca talunf'advut4|c.af.the lAcapensi'vc'
eneriy vilua available thrau|h Vunia( of haiareoui
wute tolida. Tnet hi* been true pamcularly in view of
the availability ef. ud the cavuennciuaUy unctioned
liie of, haurdom wane liquid! u incxpentive iltemiic
fueli far kiln openooM. However, with the promulf i- '
uon ef cnvuoniacnial rejulatieni inpatint uvete re-
ippreved eompUte eooibiuuon facttitiev there Hal been
a iitniTiciM effon directed'toward the'development of'
alicrnatc in HIM far ui* dUpoui af toltd huardoui
wtatta. The pmeal invetitwn evolved from Utat effort..
.One object of thii invention ti to provide i safe. tnvir
ronmeniaUy accepuate method,for diipaul of hiutd-
ou wuu maunali, inclvdiaf panicularl» haurdau
wuu Klida. which contain uinJicant leveli ef com-
buitiWe and/or talk ertuie wmjxmndi and. tons
inbrtuuc Mhturica, It e» another abject of ihil inven-
tion te provide a method of reeavennt enerfy V.IUM of
wlid combutuble huwdatu wuu rutenaU md of
'«»( wck maunali to provide up ia *0* ar more of
the eneriy ncrwremena of Ui operation. The method.
u fully eoaptiant with epctfcacee eavironnwetal emit-
von ref,uliuoni. and it (UoiUawt foe the man efficient.
use ef the wuu aiicetuli u fuel in the proccu wtinout
compramaiaf quality of the praccawd mineral product.
One aipeet of the invention eaaiansa a iuno.ue con-
fiiuriiien ef hatudoui wute proceuiaC o«ck.t"i«-
(containeruitio
-------
-------
• C - 52
. wuict u rappuiMBUl futt wndi mwiuuiutf compli-
,„ „;,„
. "Tail hat atta practiced »y pnowut fuel niodula of >
conuintnatd'aaaaMaui waitca. MOM prtfinMy iht
haurdoiti win n ptckifid "> pornoiu htvu| a • croM-MctMiui VMW ukn tlon| lint 1-1 '
of th« kilt cyliadw ui FIG. 1 feuitd i»»t W.... .
FIO. 4 it t croa-wcaoui vww of Iht ftitl cnw|Ui(
uomm ukn tloat UM UM 4-J in FIG.).
, FIO. I a amiltf to FIO. I illtiKntuif tn ilicnuie
tmbodbMM of (at charpat tppwwn. . >' • . •'
FIO- t'mt ptrnl creti-itcooiMl vww of tht «csiri-
nu lbow« m FIO,» wnh iht kJ« cytwd«r round toout
FIO. T b t ptriitl creia-MctioMl » xitt
cylinder rouuoa •„."••. ' ' ''.JJ
, . Btaduif huardna wt»t mattrial to fens naikrdoiol
want honiofcaaia prior (a comaiMmanoa facibuiit*
.' procoi control tad nummitti p«rou»tuoa of kiln eptf- .
nwn condition* by. uiuraii MOM ttmformy (from
caiuimtr.ta contaiMr) u itnu of-watit conpouuoa, al«c -and cambosoM ckancuniucti.
, Conuintnuuoa of tUt titardett want. prcfenMy u t
hatardoin want aocabitaata. not ealy prB'idti t uft :
and cORvtntM,octal for ktadliiii and Dupo«f of •
rok ffl Uw
a&
ili|i
parbciilafiy tht voUoM poroo* i« tht
Sealed conn men of haiarooa wina art caar|ed imo
iht kilt at t ponu when kila (• uaptrtnm art Niah
•' jIMfftjI^ll IO VflCOfllpOM_ Of WOfptftit COBttVi *0lillin| M
rnmpaiittu dnvta iate UM (at atrtaoL
'' fiptntjr for dMnr coflMjItM cotaovanott-M UM
ttroaa, Whk rjkt haardoa want M
. or modtJMk rtMitt of UM ootapJ* compoMma of UM -»1
coauMoi haurdota w*jtt aaa UM kilt fat ttrtta
'.-.ocean over • ptriod of (MM comiMmiiran wnn int
tiint tee aMkMg orduiniili iikit of tat cp»m«tr aattt
' CoauuMtuaw* of OM wactt tieretort —•—— UM .
eoienual for overloadull UM caeipMit ttxnl»«no« «*• M
pacurafUM kiln galnnaw witk volanlt arttiua. Tat .
rtuli a a dtatncoea and rcaMnral tTficicKy (DU) of
pnaapil ertaue hirinlon conmueau (fOKCi) of
.,».»«% and «i|her for tat proem.
. [niradWMti of UM coniaiaenied want « tat M
9SO*-tICO* COM of the kiln not only amm KcepubM .
complete ti>oi of volatttt ceeapeoaan >»i iUo,.
eniola cinami UM and diipcMl of UK iw*->olauM .-
nttt**£D EMiODIMlNt
Thil BreeooareUui to a attnod for ichitvun «ivi.
rouMiatty tatnd tn.
tionalAMla. '-.-'. • ' •'•. '. ••
In whai ia know* at Mjtoj tn or wet proctu kilnt i»t
tnurt naatral htaonf proctat a caaducud in Hit ro»i;.
io( Un cylinder. Tht ey liadtt a typwallr 10 and I: ftt:
or anrt i> diaioeiir and MO-SCO fen tn, lcn|iii ind'.t
inclioed 10 thai it tht eyimder a nttitd. raw mitiriit
fed iau> tht eppti imt of the bin cyliadtt move to- tre.
iht tewtr-flrtdT tad whtrt the final cluainnIPfoeni
taatt pirn at* UM protect clinkat it diiehwtrt tai
caotitf aid ittttgont procttai«(. Ttrnptnivrei m iht •
.niw4cliAkma«t0Mt/UMaiuinn(trraini6o«i I.'W
C to aoo« I WO* C Oat itmptniwt ui iht kiln dt-
riitltt to lt-k»w M abCM IW-BB* C u Hit uppe?
miniiil ovuanal iietiviag tad of M-calledj wit p(ocet«
kilat, locacwnat hither fat lewpermiuca tun in t)»
upper tad of dry procta kilaa, . ' . ' •
Fit lie il ii (n punt ml iitni hivt in H1"-- "T "
inelintci roun»t kiU cylia4«r Arad'n IM.lower a.-
»_ 2 » 2
^* i_, ^» ** -fc
— *»
-fc
o
O
to
.O
o.
Ui
da
-------
-------
C - 53
cry and wet proceu kilna, The gai temperaturea inaide
,ihe rotating kiln cylinder of a.precalciner.type kiln
ranges frem.ibout IMO*'to about 1600' C. it the fired
discharge end lo about 930*-IJW1 C'at tu uppermost
• .• .,' .- '-" •'-. • ' ". 4.830,290 ."•
•• . V •'.- '. '.... 5- - ••.... •.'•-.«-•
charge end. en ippennu for preheating or precalcining wute mneruli ithat can be proceued m. accordance
the mineral material befor* n ii charged into the.upper with ihii invention can oe cenved from a wide vanity
end of the rotating kiln cylinder. The kiln u typically of mduimal source) tnd,ciri>iuum* in equally wide
much shorter than kite cylinder! in conventional long range of formt and chemical competition!. They can »e
1 in the form of hard solid*: sludgtt..vncoul tar-lile'resi-
• duet, and ofteti cwtui of high molecular wei|nt'or-
ganic reaina. The.term "nixardoui wute" n intended 10
refer to thot* watte product! designated aa haurdoui
. -end., . " ,"...• " under applicable environmental,regulation!, 'pirticu-'
• .Inthe proem method.combustible huarsou* wuii*.IO larly thotc that an so caiegorued because of their in-
.. preferably.corabtuiible huardoui wane wbiti are eon-... herent touciiy and/or flammabiliiy or their content of
lamented and charged into the kiln to contact the min- tout ind/or flammable maienaU. WDUe'ihe proceu u
ml maicnal It a point along ill* length of the ailn cylin. puticularly adapted to destruction of combustible hai-
der where lltl kiln gai lemperatuni ruga from ibotu -ardoui wane toiidi. volatile conttiiucnu. of typical
,»50* C. to about 1100* C In a conventional long dry 11 solid! are readily tolerated trid aafcly and effectively
and .wet proceu rotary kilo, that range of gat tempera-• complete combusted m the proceu. •,
; turns typically found in the kiln cylinder IB a ion* that . It a contemplated that ihii proccu findi application.
cormponrH apprcauaaicly 'to the middle axial on*- loo. for thermal treatment of »Ua contaminated *nh
• third portion of ih* kila cylinder. la > prtheaur or. tone and/or eomtuiuble haurdoui compound*. • •
• precalaner type rotary kiln. Ik* specified gu tempera-20 The hazardous wutemawruli are containemtd for
ture rangca ettii ia looui the upper oae^lurd poroon of • .ufe ihipnieat and handling ind .for complete combua-
the rotary kiln cylinder. ° .< ... ' lion control of volatile coninnicnti in the proceu. Fur-
. luiardou! wute> which can be charged to a kiln for . ihcr. to facilitite control of kiln operating condmonL n
diipoul 'in. accordance, with thu :invention typically : 11 preferred thai haurdoui wute matcnal! for u&c in the
have volatile; component!. whMT are'volatilized from ii 'proceii be cellectee. opuonatly catcgenud » that
the win* material u it contact! in* hoi mineral mate* hard tblidi can be comminuted and blended with other
nil. and non-volatile component* compruuif bota com-
tumble high molecular weight brgtaic nater.aU.and
nonnofcaBuin- ' Cadence Oemx*l Keovrett under ih* name CHEM
enud aoltd haurdoui «!**•. » ihu carto* •onoud* FUEL® for burning in *ilo opetrauoni. The solid hai-
cgnctatnt^ in eiJiaua I^MI ca* be iitiiued eta direct tlardoui wuta by-product conuu of trie non-volatile and
indicationc^lheDUoflfHOltgoiilgprDCa&'rhga.for ncn-«tiraetabl*-raiidiM>! which coruujl principally of
eumple. carceM mooouo* limnaim siiu* rugug from . higji. molecular weight ream, polymen ind cntdual •
about 100-1003 peril per tuBicM on be deunuaed to volatilei. PrefenMy th* haiardota wute contaiMfued
cortapond lo a defined rang* of hydrocarbon emit-; for uae in the prcaent proceu should have a BTU valve
• siona. Continuous monitoring of effluent gaao auurti M. of greater than 5.000. BTU/lb: Free liquid*'in the solid
full complianc* with applieatal* Hvuonaenul reguia- wait* maienali mould b* minieniicd. If preaeai. they.
lions and comment product «uaJity. . - mty be' loaerbed utuig in orguue absartocni nutcnal
" Environmentally wand dupoul" u wed ill ih* tuch u ground comcioei or lutuUr BTU conmbuung
detcnpuon of th* inveniio* «***» ditpoul cifilie haa-. matenaJ. • . . '•. • . . '. ' •
. ardoui *ut* with a dettmcticM and removal eiTmency 41 Sealabi* containers for ihenaurdouiwwteihouU be
of pnnciptl organic hauidovi-conliiitienti of u leair fully compliani with applicable Oeptnmciu of Trim-
»9M«4 and cormpondingly.minimil enutiioni of other ' poniRon tttndardi for coniainmefli/thipmcnt of tiat-
poutble environtnental conuminanta, The-haurdout- trdoul wute nutenali. Sellable tieel paila or druml »re
. haurdoui wute materula to• form • hutrdou outt
hom6|eriate- Individual loci oThaiardoui wiite-l»v
mo|«(Mio cut «iw fee catc|«ru<« IK term! Or u« con-
'lent, volatile*.- halortn contenr and energy value per
• umi weifhLiPoruoni of tht wuit.homof enaic ere then
packaied'into tiealed container* adapted to be charged
into e rotary kiln ta accdrdinc* wiih the pmeni'dnv
poul proem uulmaj. for eumple. the charging
-------
-------
C-54
MJ0.290
I •
• preferred. Ttit coauineir eonmtwa w» cxerty (lrrm_
n oixliud it iM niihcr icnper •nire taut no/ itw
duciivi* end of <*t kiln) uid mtientl lira oudct) w
th* preean clummry. Other cgnmtefi UCM it Mitt -.
titdpltircmtrtbo Maid. But BU of th*con'uiMn (
tr* dependent o« ih« enerigr *tl»» of *• humrOoiu
«>u» urteud Car tfiipoul 1114 IBI ctetcay of ibe kila
'> 10 receive toe* centiiBtn. •
tii i repremiiav* unbadunent of dw invention i
tonwfeiute of haurdeui »««« lolidt njvuf. t nuni- to
mum energy .«iliw .(liai of conamaoa) of 1000
STU/lb, i ehlonn* canton of lot cfcta 1M« tnd ,.'
PCB"»tlleitU»a»ppniiipicii|tdiaw<»Uo«ii«d ..
• ptili conforming 10 DOT Speaf-c*«i* DH or JTA.- •
Tht pull ire spa hod conuucn a COMIUMTI
. .
.Pnfamunc* of tin pracnt m«ko4 tat ichi*viB|
. tnyironmcnullr Muiid 4i«pOHl. of COI«MKI»I« htiud-
'ot» wtki n coavmnoiul IOT| ary wd •« proem H
• kiliu a «hi»v»j by > no»ti chtffm vpirHtu com*'-
pn»B| i pon m ilw vtll of Uw nil* crfaMtr: i drop • •
.itiM HuadiAf f'om ihc pon uio IM tiii cylindtr IMI , .
pOMiomd » Uui ik* awn! mutna! • DM kit* will
' not pin UtrMfJi ill* port or eotua OM pen cloton H
aunnf rouooa of th* W» cylMtr. nnnri to racnvwif
Die f«l md poanomn| un« for P»»f> ihmi|li th* •
•: pen. tad maun for ipptrut * fora w ujd COHUUMT- i
it« fad mfllcicBt 10 cievt im foci froa itc necurtnf
'uitf (xnixMuiti mum ihrwih ik* pon tad drop tub* <0
• >n4 mia UM kilo cyiiM«. PraftrtDljr t down a pnv
vitftd fer.tfc* part ilont "'"i n*t*> lor icnMiaf IM
Jrel«itn to ope* ud doc* dM port « pnd«HtaH**4
iimti darut recanoo. of flu* kil*. uttidti. • .
. FIG. liB«tr»a»««nvwtw>«iito»|«r)r«»d/orw« •!
proccu U« II kaviiif kila cylMci U «tk IOMT And 1
tndV 1* «rh*ri prnetma ouotnl auieul U it di*>
ckwttd from tjtiattt It Miotnl aatml n thtr$«d .
iaih*«pp*rcnd»afkU«tli»d*tl]Mdt>avtii| c»ult «l 11 c«i.|n« •
to (Mi whm fu«l nodttl* M a racnv«« m ud t pon-«IOMil pcnuoo (FlO 2). Clown w ,,
biufd m ui* clewd poutioa Br iprui) «* coop«riiiit|
wuh Icvtr **. Lt*tt 44 a po«uoi<«d .to.ihii u kjin
crlioOr II rouia to t pouit «htr« port M ,i iinr m
hj|h*« pooooa duruif rotiiioa of. kil« cylinder. 12.
•| not.-'
conua kver 4« danai rai*«em of bin cylinder It
•• Onan 44 u pamwiMd rtttave to pon M ud uted
19 tluu *IM« U a ut the porKlottd pbtiuo*. cleuuce
a tllOMd for. «r 'Oow IBM tain cylinder U under the
inftiMnc* of Mfiav« prawn in kiln cylinder 11 *!•:
fecud oy Mo**r> 14. Air (tow ikm(h pan it imund
clonr* 44 ud into kiln cylinder 11 ttuovfh drop tu«
J4 hdpt 10 coal dotun 44 tad drop HIM M. Air ttm-
pennn ia kito cylinder U ia the vwiiuiy of drop t«b*
M nntm from e«b« 190* C 10 Iftoui 1100* C. Drop
Mb* M not bt eaemnetad of e mtienil «hick un
witiutud ihQM ihemtlly htnk candman over lo«t '
period* of urn*. (C it pretetbl)' connruted of in nicy
praucMd *y rcfrcennr II. On* tiloy Taud tuusie 'ci
'ceBKncaM of t*tt drc» flrke.M it ta tHoy wH •>• •
Durtltoy -aUw-KMt wa«r i*e irtctimtrk SVPER
U-K A Tnti tllor a t puenud nifh uren|ih Xiao
dtvfiwt for tome* M UHT F. (I1M-.CV lu rated
chesruol contpoudoa i* " (oltowr nrckcl. ek-iO'c.
ctrboa. HO-0.tO%; chromnan. J40-W01; ntn|t-
HH, l.)01> muLi .'nlke*. I.7J* mu.; luncnen.
toO-4.00%: 'Aeltlxltaiim 030%. mu.: caeili.
t JO-tOO*; nllw. 0.04* UL; ud pbotpMrui 0 04<%
Uifon»H kjta ntfta U i) co«rgl>*d *? Mowcn U U
whick iaek U A MU4
fuel ckir|Mij| cppinm a it fcetu* « i**mu*Mt*)y
' UM ou4*Mcot of ^'^ cYludci 1^ ' • '• ' •
Fod (MMta N wt loc*ud «• ctenud pbtfom 11
from whiek itey tr* lo*4*d wo ektrpH tfpwww a H
u th* kill ertorf*! U rouio. A ih*r*Mcoirp*i U if '
tocitidiOCMl lOiottow M foil
from chutut tppvwia It la •annor |x untpmutn'
in bla cylinder IX . . : . . -
Rtfcrnaf lo FIO. 2. chtrfwi tpptnca U cbtoMU of W
4<^Mo*Mui*ndM|«ieiMkil*crfci4*rt«auM« .
(rcutr ihM-ih* mtiuntim drptR of ntwnl bed. >*. •
Drop ub« M coaiBiviuciia Will 40 of
ft. ft 'i— H
• • s M -
e 0-2
'.:'Ȥ"
." _ n
.. Z'SJf
.,.__ M it petitioned u detect trutifcr of fu
ul* M ihrouih port H tnd raid bit cylinder II..An
MdiM* or vuiM* ii|ad a (enented 10 mdicttt thit tne
inntftt n compl«i«. ' • .•'•''
In optnuoo, fud ewd«K » «lotded from elected
pUifom 31 into kila cylinder mounted fuel receivtni •
chat* 41 u it ptcia d*vti*d plufann 31. At kiln cyl>n- •
• der U a routed tnd Aed recwuif cluii* 41 tpprotchei .'
•I new vMTjcd poeioe* Oud cut M conitcu pi»oted'
lever 44 nevin| clotan to ib* pon-opened paimon
tllowun fud nedBla M ta drag throuftt port )l tnd •
drop tube M tod o*to adncnl be* 14. A« kiln cylinder
cantuna tai rouiw tAd pnoud lever 44 movo put
flied C4A *«. ih* clotiir* i* r*nm*d n ih* ponn|
chin* 14] ti tttuoetry ud ammcd immrditieiy ibove
...
."-'O
u
••^•:-:.t.^
-------
-------
G-55
4,850.290
• • the routing kila cylinder. Stationary fuel .recevui
chutl *i u poiiiwettd w that u cone* into aupuneni' .
wnh pen 131 and drop tub* U* one* od each revoiu-
IK» of kila cylinder 111 A fuel BOdul* retauuae ml M .
' it'aevaied arcanfercaaally'oa iheveitcnor of kiln >
. cylinder 1121> an e^poiHmn alignment wuh'odin •
' port .131 and ttauonary fuel receiving chute Ul and
1 hiring rail lermiai 42.44 u oppooie cdfa of pen 131 •
to till when fuel module 3d u portioned ia recertng
' chut Kl it nda on reitmuig fad 40 until nil urmiaui '*
42 of reuiautf rail U clean fuel module 30 u i pout •
• where receiving chute lU port II* and drop t«bt U4 •
art «' alitnmeai. iatf fuel modal* M fllU under Hit •
force of In-ity through pen. Ill u>4 drop tube 134
. onto the ouunl bed utfthowa in FIO. 4. Fuel BOdul* "
, retaiaiat rav Mind port Utart eacloiediaToed uau>-
lir houuf MJ which heJpi 10 control itr.inlu'tniwav
ifl» kdacyliaderm through pan U*. Ai kila drliadcr .
Ill rotate* iod.nd urmiaua 44 clean Ihe fuel recemftg ...
chut* 141. UM neil fuel module can be tmufcrred 'ia ™
reeemag chut* J41. \' •"'>' ': •'• i.''-'
With reference 10 FIO. T. fuel modulo M caa be
delivered directly «H°>lhi mineral bed 134 ia die upper • -
' end 110 of rotary kila, cylinder'211. la twrmal open-' „
no*, auaeril material ii preheated by ihe heat roe lined
in Ihe eiAtutl ft***. In prccalcin*r operation, fuel a
added to the ruer dim 1*4 and coabuiu tuher -"h •'
cicea air ui'ilM kila (ta or addiooaal air provided
. through t tepartu duct 141. Tat energy related by w
tha combiaaoa ia ibiorbed by the rflincral-auunal
before enteni| the kilo. Thit preheated mineral maw
nil tnveU down i duel parallel w the fuel modal* .
delivery tube HO and then dowi ramp IH and ««*)
upper ead IK of inclined routine, kila cylinder 111 ,,
when thermal pnceuiag of the. mineral euieml it
^ completed u it ox>vet down rotaiiag kiln cy&odcr 111.
A fuel module delivery tub* 270 a imulled at Id* tpptr
.end of rasp 141 at th* biM of prehcater/precalcatr
' ruer dun M. Delivery tube 1TO hia a ceramic luted «
portion J11 proaioui to the bat* of the mer duct 1*4 .;
• .ind tt equipped wuh miner |tie valv* IT4 aid ipper '
. ud lower eue valvct 174 tad m, rttpecBvely. oner* '
tied dunni the 'fuel module lo*di»« prradex*. The
delivery lab* a con/ititred ia tfcel a fuct owdmi* cMer: ,t
m|ihebueof mer duct 144 thmth delivery nbe 174
. hat taffioesi memeatum u carry is quckljrdawanmp
141 and onto in* mintnl bed Itt ia upper end U9 of . '
wury tain cylinder 2U Fly between ibOMt'SO'Ciftd HOT C '
'in eicoi of n,n% i* ill iota,
..Comparable raulu »ere obtained.in t conventional
1en|dryandwetproc<
'* „* ' '
J *
-------
-------
-11
C-56
4,130.290"
wou a chiriod dincdr one tix tippw «na of Ovi kill
12'
.11 *» iwpr»v«J m«hed r haud. rauiui« cylincKf conitiAini.
auuruL ui« nwtliod COBI^^UI, ih* i.cn »r
ITIn mil had of tUhu* »>>«r»ui Uw ceouiMTtnd
•HutidOHl WMM • chiffcd iferoiifft I pen unte W»
- ^yli^jjj^ ^*im» ' IT. Tta mnbad of eUia l« wNrtia ih* coiium.r. .
of Wcndini iM kuwtfOM w«iui to fom i huuttou it*d Kmrtrm wuu u «thodofi:U)io»»N€rwiJi«»il««Mi«m. 11 Th* meiked of diim II whnin ih« aotfiiuij
ptniutuihtBOwtefcJuriiuif n*t*'r » rottrr Ua « i pnamtf or rnalaaa typt roiiry bJn
Cieiooot ilOO*C •• "" >t*vu»i « prrtMiei pomo« upumm from t fouunt'
' ' ' ' crliadw ktn*| u «pp*r ad for i
"km UMlulii|ungip«nnnrut*>r'<»
CuitowliOO'C .. . ' •
U. Tlw method of clua 12 olM
itcd luixirdotii «ut» a ctai |«t ihrov|J> t pon ui «*•
kit* eylindw valL .....,- ,
!«. TtK n»«thod of eto« U farthw eom»raifl» ib«
'
u/T*. Mted of dam it Knhtr oxnpm»i ihe
' mp of tltadU« U» hiTirrtout W«CB la farm 4 lumd-
OM wuu bojx>|cn«t« fof pict»|nii Hi «iid coamam. U
itwpKU|i«tot
ih« luurtem WHM « eurad ml »
-------
-------
^;; -••".
C-57
US. Patent M is, iw Sh*t 2 of 2 4,850,290
" '
riG.,3
- • '« S ff '
• gra
fE jr •
— ** n
tt
8
to
hTj-
.o
O
OQ
cn
-------
-------
.C, 58
'atent M 25.19*9 , she*? of? 4,850,290
14
ss .
11 "I
a
a
o
to
o
.8-'
Uj
-------
-------
' '..•". ••.'"';•. v ' • '-';•" - C-59 • •'' • •:- >' .-:..:- .-.; -,-
Contact: Reginald Miller, Technical Representative (313) 778-9089 : •-.
i' . . Chartes Binkey, Environmental Compliance: Manager (313) 824;5418 '
'Processor: ,'PetroChera Processing Inc. .... ' '
Phone: •_. see contacts .-..',. ..•'".''-.' :*.
1' ' ' • ' ' ' ' . ' • ~ ' • f' _' . • , ' '" • •. -\
Location: .Detroit,'Michigan •'-.;. . . . l .
Date: •'. 27 February, 1992^28 Februat>'1992 ; -'
ICT Contact: Prakash Ramaswamy' - • . V ' ' ' .
Report'of Discussion:' •••.'. . . • '• " • - •.'. . '.' . ' •',••• . -• ''.[
" .'.. ,' PetroChem Processing Inc. is.a T/S/P facility that accepts.wastes in containers and
bulk liquid-tankers. -The facility only accepts .wastes that have heat, content values greater
than.5,000 BTU/lb. ' PetroChem .repackages sludges and' solids into 6-gallon.burnable •
containers for shipmenl to cement IcJlns. .' ." •' '-''•'.- -. •-•'• • ' "'."'
Current status of facility to accept K048^K052, F037, and F038 wastes: ' . '.._.•
., » ••" The facility is permitted to accept K048-K052, F037, arid F038 : wastes
Volumes of K-listed petroleum refining wastes currently being accepted and processed by
facility:- •'.'•'• • ••' . .. . ". •' • : ,'^". . " ' ±\ "' •• - '• .. ... •" .-
, • . - Mi. Binkey, indicated that PetroChern regularly accepts K0484C052 wastes.
• •!'• . .: ' The facility receives the K-listed petroleum refining wastes in containerized'-'
' form. Mr. Binkey could not estimate Volumes of K-listed wastes accepted and
;-''' '• processed in 1991. •- .';. ' ."••"*•'. .-'.';..-.'; ",-.•..•'•. '. -- , '.-'.-
.''.-.•• '. PetroChem operates one mobile-process unit. The K04&K052 wastes are -,
>..'•• ,' slurried on site and.shipped to Ash Grove;iii a Bulk tanker (one 5,000 gallon.
. ' J • tanker/day). Mr. Binkey could hot estimate how much of the ;K-listed waste
' "-: • is blended for each tankcr-or the.down time for'.the. unit. • •'• • . "' • ..
Current processing and storage capacity of- facility (for.all wastes): ' •" '•.'••'• ' ; . .
''. :-'•'••' .Mr.'Binkey provided>current maximum processing capacity and .utilized
'_'{• • ''capacity estimates. Maximum'-practical, capacity is 70,000 gallons/day.
;/,-' Currently utilization is 50,000 gallons/day. ' Available capacity is 20,000
•• -,.' •' ' ""• -gallons/day. Mr. Bfnkey could not categorize these-volumes by'physical types
. '• .of waste. ' •' •- : • -' . v
•7 • "•'• '-.' " ^• : •
,1 . .-''. .•;•••• \ • ", ' ' '.
ill-"
3-v! z.o.-.,,
m
O
•o
to
O
'O.
CO
UJ
-------
-------
•'.. . . • •••-,•• .-•.-.: ' ." C-60 '•• . ' ' . .-• '.. ••/ ' _ : . • '•
• «.-" Mr. Binkey stated that 792 six-gallon pails are shipped to cement kilns on a
daily basis. •,'•'(••.-. : . . .
Physical forms of wastes accepted by facility: • . ; .
.' • •' The facility accepts liquids, noh-pumpable sludges, pumpable sludges, and .
• '-'.'• solids!.•' All forms 'of waste except liquids must be containerized. • •
Heat'contcht restrictions imposed on wastes accepted by facility: :
' •. Because of permit requirements, the facility can only accept materials that
'•- • '" ••-; have heat-contents greater than 5,000 BTU/lb. The facility is considering to
'•• •• lower the minimum to 2,500 BTU/Ib when the cement kilns certify compliance
. . with the BIF Rule.'. ... . ;; . . ,
BIF. Rule impact'on the facility: , .'•-'•• ' . . ' '••''. • •• '
'.• Mr. Binkey indicated that permit can be modified within a brief period of time
• "••••• after kilns,complete compliance certification. . ' :;. .. . :
Cement Kilns utilized: , ' • .. . • • -. •. '.' •. :i ;• " '•'•' - . . •
' •- Ash Grove (Chanute, Foreman, Louisville), ,. . •
" •; Dixie Cement (Khoxville, tenn) ;". . •'. • ,_.'. . ';...
Incinerators utilized: N/A.". '. . .- .. '.'''.,, ••"••.'.',
Waste packaging for cement kilns: • . . •,.,-.- '. '.'''.'• '*•"""' •
.* .Waste.is repacked into 6-gallon containers. Mr. Binkey could not provide
.• . - .-. process mechanisms of repackaging unit, . ' .-v' •".-. >•'
» ^ ^. rt n
1 0 . -. •» ^ tti -
?a « £ ' •
• " 0.3
c — **-. . .
V-O'
o •;-.
o
OJ -
-------
-------
t*t
..- . .- ' ••• •••-• , . •• •/ .. , . c'-6i . • , •-• ;;. .= • ' •"'. ' "
Contact: Bill. Clarke, Facility Sales. Manager • ••.; '. •, . -' * ;
'Processor: . GSX/Laidlaw . . , , ' .
Location: • Crowley.'Louisiana ..-:', •..-.•• . '. ' .•
Phone::, (318)783-3624 -, " '
Date: 2 March 1992 M " ." . ...
ICF Contact:. Prakash Ramaswamy - ' . . "
' Report of Discussion: . ' ' . • .•'.•••-
GSXA-ajdlaw is a T/S/D facility that accepts wastes' in containers,, cubic yard bags, '
! butk tankers, and roll-off bins, the facility repackages. the wastes for shipment. to eiihe'r
commercial hazardous waste incinerators or cement kilns. The facility repackages sludges
and solids that have.heat content values greater than 5,000 BTU/lb into ,6-ga;l|on burnable
containers for- shipment to cement -kilns owned by Ash' Grove or resuspends sludges and.
.solids with heat content value greater^, than 5,000 BTU^b into a liquid; slurry for b'ulk
shipment to River. Cement. Wastes not meeting the minimum heat content'requirements
of 'cement kilris arc repackaged or shipped directly to 'hazardous waste' incinerators.
GSX/Laidiaw also provides off-site .processing services for clients. Telephone 'discussions
with GSX representath'cs focused on K-lisied petroleum wastes processed at the ,Cr6wley,
Louisiana facility 'and processing capacities of off-site treatment units owned and operated
• ' ' ' ' ' "' ' ' '"'
•*
o -
I fits
a o, ^ *..
• o «• „ ,
;o ••.-.
o"
. O-
Current status of facility to accept K-listcd.(K048-K052) and F-listed; . (F637.F038)
petroleum refining wastes: ., '.-.'.-' . . ' " v : ' • .'• , • • .- -' ...
.'.•'• The facility. is permitted i to ;accept K048-K052, F037, and F038 wastes.
•Rejection rate of petroleum refining wastes at facility: - •'•'._ ' • ~ • .'. '.
v*,. ' Mr. Clarke- indicia ted that wastes' shipped to facility are pretreated.on-site at .
•• ' . refiners, therefore the reject ion rate is 0%. .... '•..•
' Volumes of K-listed petroleum' refining wastes beirig accepted and processed: !
.- • - Mr. Clarke indicated that the facility regularly accepts K048-K052 wastes. He
• . '--; . estimated that the facility accepts between '.375 ••• and 500 tons of K-listed
.. . . ' ' petroieum refining wastes, per month. He indicated that the 98% of K-listed
.. . ; ".. petroleum refining wastes are shipped in roll-off bins to. the facility/ • .
-------
-------
' •••.-...•- • •• '". •.' C r fl2 -' .- •' ' ' . - •'. ; '. .
. * '; Mr. .Clarke indicated that, less 'than 2% of'K-listed wastes are'shipped in
; containers to. the facility: He suited that there are no technical restraints for
' liaving'petrbleum refining 'sludges shipped in containers as'long as' the \i-aste •
.,.-'.' meets minimum heat content requirements. . .-.•'•'
"Current:storage and processing capacities of iiicility (for alj wastes): • , -..
'• •, For containerized wastes,'Mr. Clarke estimates that the facility is capable of
accepting I0;000 55-gallon drums per month and is currently"receiving 6,000
•. . ' ' . \ drums per'month. :-•/.'... , • •
.;''•>'. . .For bulk solids^ Mr. Qarke estimated that the facility is capable of accepting'
., - ~ 'sixty roll-off, bins/month and is currently receiving forty roll-off bins/rnbnth.
Physical forms'of wastes accepted by. facility: .•'._•.'•-. . • • . , .'' v. >".'.',
. • .The facility accepts1 liquids,, npnpurhpabie sludges, ptimpable sludges, and
• . • solids. These physical foriris of waitc are accepted in bulk tankers, containers,
cubic yard bags, and roll-off bins. (Waste packing[protocol must meet D.O.f •
:- '.. • , • specs): ".-;.-.•; ' : "'.' • . - .''""••
Heat content restrictions imposed on'wastes accepted by facility: '
._•• Permit requires;that the facility can.only accept,material that has a.heat
- • content greater than 5,000 BTU/lb.' -
BIF Rule impact on the facility:'/ -, ' •;-,.. ' • : . . •• , .
- » Mr. Clarke is uncertain on how the state is going to respond to BIF Rule. ;Mr.% /
.-.•' .. Clarke believes that.fuel"processors:in Louisiana are not-going to-change .'
' • "minimum heat content requirements in the coming yearv " .'.'..
Cement Kilns utilized: . " , • ; '; '.."',--' .••• . . •
'• •". Ash Grove (Fbrenaan) . ' . 7 ' '-• . • -. ' • •'.'".
Q River.Cement (Festus). ';"" . '
Incinerators utilized: N/A -•, • "•• '.!"•' • . '.-•. . '".• ....
Waste packaging for cement kilns:'-- , ''.' . . . '• ''.-'•.•• •''.".-•
• • ..Waste is repacked into 6-gallqn containers for shipment to Ash Grove. 409c
of all waste is repackaged into 6-gullon .containers. ' •'._.;'•
;j If
e ~ 2
• .-5 ST S
!*•*•
'
; 0 » M.r •
' -
.
-D .
to
^
•o •••
;O"
LO-
-------
-------
s >—s
/-,...<.. . •• • ,c-63 ..'.'•'. '••••::':••'• f .-.•.. ..
• Solids are resuspended. and shfpped. via bulk tanker.'to. River Cement.
. " • .;_."- .Presently.60% of all wasteris processed.for:'bulli: tanker,shipment. ".'•'•
Other capacity related issues: . . ;. , - • '. •''•.. .'••"...'
'• -VOne factor, that affects facility.capacity is the. seasonal .operation of cement
, \ kilns. Several of the cement kilns that GSX utilize are down for maintenance
during Dec.,Jan.,and Feb. During this period, outgoing shipments are reduced
.'by'50%. . .. • '' -1'"7 . . '•.'•'•".".'• :' :••
"• • ' GSX/Laidlaw'operates between 40 and 50. mobile plate-arid'frame filter.-
• '.-•'' :; presses; that provide on-site dewatering'of K-listed petroleum refining sludges.
. Between 20 and 30, filter presses:are in Texas and between 10 and 20 filter
presses are in Louisiana. Plate and frame filter presses-can reduce water
. content-in sludge to 35-40%. Each filter, press produces between 20 arid 45
• cubic yards of filtercakes per week.'Throughput volumes of filter presses are
. .' , • based on filter presses operating'eighty hours per week. \GSX lises.x'aribus
types of organic filter media to enhance heat content in resulting filter.cakes.
•Mr. Clarke indicated that dewatered sludges.that meet the 5,000 BTU/lb
requirement are transpbned to the Growley, Louisiana facility-to be blended;
. . as fuel for cement kilns. . . ••'' ' ' ..'-.'., • • .
'* ' . GSX also uses-.thermal dryers in,conjunction, with plate'-and.frame .filter
' presses. Mr. Clarke stated that the filter, press/thermal dryer system can
• ' reduce moisture content of sludge to less than 5%.'. • :•••'• ".
.
g-3'
~ •
o a..S"o
-
n " -» _• m
, o. a. — " ,
• o « g.
e 0.2
. if: .
E '
/''°/'
••'K)';._;'
•' --o '
:,. 'O
U).
CQ
-------
-------
V
'.C-64 ••'"
. Contact:. Ed Tobia "'••• . ,'
' . -Processor: ' GSX/Laidlaw. .•'
., Location: Houston, Texas •',
.. ; Phone:';' (713X467-3433;. .
Date:
2 March 1992
.' ICF'Contact: Prakash Ramaswamy ..... . ' ' . • .
Repqn of Discussion: ,' . .'.-.'«'.'..- : •.; ''.- , '
•:. This • phone, discussion focused'on'; GSX's off-site pretreatment operations of
, petroleum refining wastes in the Gulf Coast region. '. .' . '
'. " ,-Nfn Tobia stated that"GSX currently, operates four mobile thermal" dryers units.
Three are in California and one is in Texas/.The thermal.dryer .unit in Texas is used for
.processing F037/F038 wastes. .The refinery is using the thermal dryer/filter press,
; combination in orderTto:delist the waste for that particular facility! Mr. Tobia indicated that
• the maximum processing capacity for the units that GSX operates is 2 tons/hour. The dryers'
... . 'are designed to operate 24 hour/day. Mr. Tobia indicated that-the practical maximum
! 'capacity of thermal dryers is 1.5 tons/hour based on a 40% sludge/60% water mixture. „ Mr.'
Tobia beheves that the F037/F038 ffltercakes being produced at this particular refinery have
. . ; heat content values ranging between 1,500 to 2,000 BTU/lb. He noted that diatomacous
earth, a material with no heat content value, is used as the filter aid.- The resulting filtercake
has the consistency of fly ash and a moisture content of 5%: Mr. Tabia believes that there'
is a shortage of thermal dryer units' available for 'drying petroleum refining sludges. He
;•• ' indicated that .there are several, competitors, but most own one or two thermal dryers.
- •*
• n -<» 2
a a " — ra
. a o, *-' M
• -o » .i '
go. 2
- o
K)
•'"'O.
"' O"
-------
-------
Contact:- Steve Chandlih i • .. . ....
-Processor: GSX/Laidlaw . ••.'.-.. '; . •.'/ - •'_'.. ','•'
'Location:1 ' Bakersfieid,. California '''.-•• . . •.-,.'
Phone: .. ..(805) 835-5801 :. ' V. . ' - •.. . - - ' ; ' ' •' ,•
Date: 2 March 1992' . . • " '. '
ICF Contact: Prakash Ramaswamy. . • .-. ' • . '.
. Report of Discussion: ' . ".•-*. ' •'"'-'.'• '
This, phone discussion focused on GSX's off-site pretreatment operations'of"
• petroleum refining wastes in Galifornia. . • . '.'- ; ' . -•.'••'-•,
^IrChandlin indicated that GSX operates three-thennal dryers in California , •
'....- ••• Thermal dryer'#1 is 'currently being used in conjunction with a plate and
frame filter press to pretreat'K948-K052 -sludges at a local, refinery. '.The
system is processing 1.5 tons per hour. The'system is in operation for 24 '
' hours/day, 4 days per week.^The sludge is filter pressed using a coke product ,
' .; .filter'aid and dryed' at 'a temperature between 350-500 °F. .Mr. Chahdlin
• ' stated that 40 'tens per week is currently-being shipped to cement kilns'. 90% .
• of the filtercakes are transported in-roll-off bins, 5% are shipped in cubic yard
bags, and 5% are shipped in containers. Mr. Chandlin indicated that the filter
; press/thermal diyer unit can reduce moisture level to less than 10%.
•.-.'•- '•' - - ; ' • • . " ' ' ' • • ' ' • ' '•••"*--,
,''••.' • Thermal dryer #2 is currently waiting for reassignrnent. '- .'...'
•• •.' • » . Thermal Dryer #3' is undergoing minor repair. '• . ,• .
Mr. Chahdlin indicated that there is a shortage of thermal dryers. He stated .that there is
'.no available capacity'for the GSX. thermal dryers'operating'in'California. Mr. Chandlin
estimates that there are twelve mobile thermal dryers currently operating nationwide.'
Mr. Chandlin believes that the F037/F038 wastes will have a lower heat content value than '
that of the K048:K052 wastes, but that adding filter media with higher heat content and by
adjusting retention time of the dryer should enhance heat content of the resulting F037/F038 .
filtercake.'' ' . '. . • •'.•'.- - ' .• •
' •„»£?
• »=•*"
. • .- g-v, tea z
•> o 2 ro
' '• v a - s- 2 H
• . ? 3, « •" —.
n
QQ
-------
-------
. '. •.-.-• '-; '"•'_ ;•' . . .. C-66 •; " '_ • ' : . '• - .;
Contact: Dav'e Parker, Project Manager. • ..." ••'',-'. • :• '.
• Albert Williams, Process/Control Supervisor ..'"'' •-'.-•'
Processor • OHM Group • ' . • • " • .'•''; ;.•''.''
.'Location: Marrow, Georgia/' , •. • "•..•••.'•'
• - *. ' ., .''..',. • . . r '', " /
Phone:. (404)362-8902 :... ' :
Date: -V : 9 March 1992, 10 March 1992 . ;
ICF Contact: Prakash Ramaswamy. '' • - • '^ .• • . " '• ,"••'•_
Report of.Discussion: ., " • . - ..' ..-'-
. .OHM Group is a T/S/D facility that.accepts wastes in containers, bulk tankers, and
roll-off bins. The facility repackages the wastes for shipment to either commercial hazardous
waste incinerators or cement kilns. PetroChem repackages sludges and solids that have'heat
content values greater than 5,000 BTU/lb into 6-gallon burnable containers for shipment to
cement kilns:' Wastes not meeting the minimum heat content requirements of cement kilns
are. repackaged or shipped directly to hazardous waste incinerators. ... - ••' _'y '••:;
'Current status of facility to accept K048-K052, F037, and F038 wastes: .
• .' • . '' '- "'•. • -V '" ;t>'.". •'-"•' • • ' .
\. o The facility can accept KW8-K052 wastes. The facility has applied for F037,
.' '.- F038 wastes 'and 'expects approval from the state within six months. - •; . •
Volumes of K-listed wastes'currently being; accepted .and processed by facility: , •' •. .
• ••• Mr. Parker-;could not estimate the volumes of K-listed petroleum-wastes
( accepted and processed in 1991.; Mr. Parker could not indicate whether K048^.
• . • .K052 wastes -were shipped to the facility' in roll-off bins or in containerized
•; • . .'form.'.." --• ' ''-' ••-'.'• • . ._•..--*•,'". ' "••
Current processing and storage capacity of facility {for all wastes): : .. ;
• • Mr. Parker''stated-that the. maximurn throughput (taking storage and
. '• •. processing factors into consideration) is two hundred 55-gallon drums per day.
. .. •. Mr..Parker indicated that 50% of that capacity is available. .Mr. Williams
''indicated that .between 75 and 100 55-gallon drums are processed daily. ;The •
;" .'' .rnaximurflroll-off bin storage and processing capacity is two roll-offbins per
•. .week. Container storage is limited to 165,000 gallons at any given time.. :;'
. i ' ' . " ' • . . V • . • - " '
I. • .. -..."- ' .." ' ' ....
Physical forms accepted 6y facility:' ' ., . • ' ' :.. ';•.". '•
g• »•
O
o
to
'
-------
-------
-.The facility accepts liquids/containerized solids arid.bulk solids; The bulk:
solids must'not contain free liquids." • . . . ,'-•'.
Heat conient, restrictions at facility:
Facility can only accept material that has a heat content greater than 5.000
BTU/lb if it is going to be blended into fuel.. Material less than 5,000 BTU/lb
is accepted,-but it must be brokered lo an incinerator.. Mr. Wiliiaras indicated
that.between 60% and 70% of K048-K052 wasies are shipped:to cement kilns
and between 30%. and 40%' are. shipped -to commercial incinerators;
BIF Rule: impact on^ the'facility: . . ' •• ,' :- .• .' ',.•'', .
• ' , Mr..-Williams does not expect that the BIF-Rule will not alter heat content'
v restrictions .'•••' : . .- . .•>.••'"
Cement kilns-utilized: , "' .. , •''"•'.
• Ash.Grove (Chanute, Foreman, beuisville) J • • . ,.
'••'•'-. ESSROC (Indiana) ' ; ' , . . • '
,• Southdown (Knoxville, Tehn), :. ; . "'•'... - "... .'
Incinerators .utilized: ' -,'.. ...'.'. '•••.•' . • ' -^
• .:••, •'. .Rollins"/ • •. ' .,•' ;.• . . ' •_•' "'. .;" . ' •:.:;•
.-'•'» • Ensco . •' •' . • . . " ' . ' . .--.,.".'•"
• -A "... . • • .' • •" •;•'.".. :- ' ' - . . . - - • • .-"
Waste packaging for cement kilns:. .....'••••' " . ' •
. ' •• / Waste is removed manually -or via -Bobcat from roll-off bins. The material is.'-
.then packed into 55 gallon .drunis. The 55. gallon drums are'processed
: through an automated system which repacks material into 6-gallon pails. ,
" a » 9
• " s ff " 2
t± 5 i».» B.
'
(I ™ *••
a a —
''
.
• "
•• • •• ---2 ~ a
!8
'.o
o
-U)
C3
-C
-------
-------
'•' " - v • •' ..."•• .';,-;• ••" -v . .- c-68. • •.• •''.;.. .-;." '•'..: . • ; ' •
Contact: TonyLavinwood ; .> /'- - , .' ..'••••_ •'•
Company: - Allwqrth . , . r ./ • / ''.',••• •
-' • - ". • : :'".••'• •• :'.• ;. '" ' ,. • • "".. '-•. • , • •'• '.' "
Phone:. .(615)37W215 \. • , ' •. \. '. -.-'. ,';" '• -.'... '..'•
Date: .' . 10 March, 1992 ".- v, . .'. ; .; " ,''.'•'.'.•'
Caller:1 - Lisette Lambregts • .- '. , • .;••••.•
' ' ' ~ • - x "
Subject: .•• Packaging capacity '. ' •" . - '. , • '
Report of Discussion: / - "-.''" . '
Their hazardous waste fiiel packaging capacity is 18,533 tons per'year) and they are
currently operating at just over half of this; •. ' . . '., /
.'They have •submitted a permit/modification to be. able to handle K048-52 and
F037/38, and expect it to be approved this vyeek or next. '.- ' . •' ::;-• . / '
.
ill!'
~ ' •»
• n -.» 0
' o * ^ „. W
ft ft JJ. *1
5 <-
2 o ST.
n
O:
to
'
"<•--.I-. ,V;,v'-'..;'.,.
OQ
-------
-------
;'*. •' • •'. '•' :, '• . •<'.-- "•'•' "• -.', C-69 '•,;,,-. '• • . . - ' './
Contact: ...Tom Scott . . , ' • '. . :
•'Company:.'..Cadence' ' ..'::...; : : -_ •'''
Date: :10 March, 1992 . .'..'' ' .
Callers: .Gary'Light, James Hsu, Prakash Ramaswamy. Lisette Lambregts-.
Subject: . • Packaging capacity . - , ••-.-•
Report of Discussion:. " , • •'.',: '.'; /'. , . . ' -. , ..
Cadence operates "two types of. mobile" packaging, equipment: pailers anil baggers.
Paiiers fil| six-gallon'pails, and ideally take material.that is slightly'sticky: Baggers fill'10.5 .
.gallon bags, and-ideally take material that is. well-dried. F037 and'F03S wastes would go
straight from a filter, press to a, pailer, but would need to be thermally dried before going to
'a,bagger. Mr. Scott.indicated that industry is moving toward increased drying, to minimize
: the amount of water that must be transported to treatment facilities.. The cost of containers
is ai consideration also; each bag-costs less than^Sl and pails cost;about S2. Baggers are
' designed to fill five lp.5-gatlon bags per minuie,-and have been tested as high as 7.5 bags
' per. minute., Mr. Scott-estimates,ihat baggers normally average .three bags ber minute..
Generally, the baggers'are less complicated than the pailers,. and therefore require less'.
•maintenance and are operational a greater percentage of the time. Mr. Scott estimates ihat.
baggers are operational 90 percent .of the'timc, pa.ilers 80 percent. ,- . . ,
:'• Cadence operates one bagger and one paiier at Ash Grove's Kansas facility. The
-pailer has an operational limit of about 14,000 tons per year. Cadence also operates a
bagger at a remediation site in Calcasieu, Louisiana, one idle in a warehouse in Kansas, and
one leased to a processor in Texas. -The pailer 'at Ash G rove, Kansas is receiving K048-52.
.From January to April 1991 it receive-1,500 tons. The machine.currently operates one or
two shirts per day, but could operate three^if there was sufficient demand. They have not..
'run into storage problems; but the.ideaj system would be for wastes to be packaged on site.
at refineries.. Mr. Scott indicated they are 90.percent certain of one contract to lease mobile
.packaging machine to'a.refinery, 75. percent certain of another, and less than 50 percent
'certain of two others. After movingj baggers can be set up in onertwo days, pailers in two-
four. They have not had trouble With permitting these units', as officials have regarded them
•as packaging, ;not processing;. However, refineries, that operate dryers'generally require
processing permits; Currently Mr. Scott is not aware of any dewatering contractors that Have
packaging equipment. Many refineries are adding dryers. .... ' . • .
.; .-Packaging capacity is a bottleneck for utilizing containerized solids capacity in cement'
kilns, but they have hot run.into real problems except for a few months in the winter.
Mr. Scott believes that if ajl the: wateris eliminated from FQ37 and F038, most would
~ rt
-.VC Z O. ±
a ~ • p
'
-& a-:
§ =••
. '•
o
D
to
•o
-------
-------
' -"' " ' .' -' -'' ' '•'"-' C-70 •.'..;. '• • ,-" " • •
have a heating value greater than 5,000 BTU/ib. It is difficult to filtei- all water out without
•. using organic filter aids. Mr. Scott does not believe that the use of organic filter aids
• constitutes"blending up" due to the intrinsic value of the aids themselves (from 6^000 to
9,000 BTU/Ib with sonic as high as 12,000 or 13,000 BTU/lb), but rather, that diatpmaceous
. earth acts as a diluent. 'Organic filter aids'merely avoid masking the inherent heating value
.' of the wastes. .'••• • . ' . ' '.'••"•••
•J-
-------
-------
^f""
C-71
LATE INFORMATION
a
•9 - jj
•rE??
o •» " <• .•
S-vsza.
•f
a. & ^- BI .
• 8 ;•«
e ?•««.•
Sg.o
'V S'» :
a •
o
to
un
-------
-------
•
oG.-3o-.92
029: :i; oo.to
"
2002
c-72.
•.•QTS
SUBJECTS Meeting with CESe'-He'HC Cont rols. Under .the BIS1 Rule
.
n • . •..•.= •.
:*i?s-.;
./MM:- • Bob Eollcway, Cii.ei
-•• Combustion Section
. CO:
BIT Docket.
•• .pa Kay--l, 1992,. representatives c; the Cement . Kiln Recycling-
:oalition (CXRC) net with /JO representatives to discuss CXRC's
:oncerns with conplying with the EC rr.Vvrisioas !oC Che BIF rule.
• Jee attached list of attendees. - ' ' '' .'. . ' .'.•''=.»' -' . . . • .-
CSEC expressed •< their .concern t-iec icilns'- feeding raw '. • • '
nateriala with high orgarJ.z content snti that subsequently have -
,iigh EC. levels (greater taan- about *o ppnw eafi - Tip/to. 250. ppmv) '. '•'
••ay not bo able to comply with the alternative HC provisions of ; '
:he BI?;tuie eyes if. the nile' is attended to allow 'a '10. ppnw EC
/oriability factor. (Bas«i on previci. 5 discussions 'with CKEC' and '.
•.-eevaluation by the igeacy,. the Agaccy plans <' to .Issue a. technical •
aat to bha BIF rvle to redefine dhe baselinevHC. level that . .
" '
3 - a
-O.S"
. .
. :annat. be aatceeded" when- -fccrning hazardous 'waste! as'- Che- EC level
.-, :hat -is achieved wbsn the' kilii is cat turning hazardous wast* and - -
: Is .- operated under coadicio=.s .to ndniiaire .HC •miss : ons p 1 yg 1 0 ';••
- JDHltf". ) '•".-''-. ' . ' ; ' :. - " ' " , ' • ' - - ' •
: . CKRC asserts that tbe bwseliiie KC. level- (i'.e.,' »ftien not :
suming haiardoua waste) '.varieg .auista^tiatlly over tine (I.e., -
.•eaJc to week 'or lEonth' to abnth. not hour to totir) for- kilns with'".'
..-elatively high HC levels tron raw nar»rial- (i.«l, greater than .
Uxiut 40 ppaiv) . CXRC. iiadisated that chey did not fully
mdexstend the factors that, caused tha baseline HC level to vary, .
jut it appeared to be. a £iaccion-.o£ variability of organic
:octent of the rair nateridi and variabilicy oJ the amount of .the.' '
jrgaaie cooposnds deaorJbed from the r sw : naterial that are
, actually combusted rather than emitted: aa,HC. ..Ibe; Cracdion -of . ,
urjjaaics that are coJdjusted rather than emitted as HC. will-ivary '
,.*» the tesperature. profile in .the Icila chacgeai 'la turn, there .
>an,be a nuaiber of operating factors . that affect changes in the
tenperature profile. '. . \ .-.'•'• -,,, '-._ - /..".'•', •' .- •',' ' ••':-" '-
. - . Given :that the .baselise for kilas with high, kc levels can •
rary substantially over ciae «™j| chat the incus try does not fully . -
mdexstaad the factors :thi= cavise the variability, the industry
is concerned that soae facilities nay not. &e able t^o comply with
:he alternative HC provisions, of the issg rule. .Accordingly, CKRC
isked if there was. some wv/ affected facilities could have .
-idditional time to try to aauage the problem.' we , indicated chat
the inule would b« iaplenia£=ed on the schedule pronalgated — : '. '
:emeat. facilities have until 8/21/92, tc sutenit Part B - . .
. implications, .request a case-by-case tiae 'extension ^ for •••'
roapliance with ,tae B: concrols, aad receive approval, for .the"
. :iice .extension in an agreement that includes c. EC limit based on
to
Tj ••
OV.
o .-•
03!
'.. ' !
• ' -. .' -T
-'"•'.: ^^j.'.-w^'T"-'.-^*•''--''.•"' - .-.': '..''•.-.-;.'';'•'.''••-.'.
-. • " • .•;-..."-V4,'',>v:* -^-..v-- •-.-•," -;v-' •.-..,•.,.-•
-------
-------
»r
14:43 0202 ZJ2 C080
EPA••••. »:3tI.BIV .
C-73 .' '. •;•
';he baseline level adjust«s ijy tha <• j r .::abiiity. factor, of' 10
(if tha Agency so ;ameB(ia. tha rule, ^- •'
a 003
I
•i"
in
- «
• « — •» G
-O a - „ Bl
a. a. i- "
: O .
..-:1O..'
to
:. -W. ,.
.'•••o';
o\ •
-------
-------
-'I- ..
-JJO-'JZ .'il:,15' ' .OIO: 232 OCSO . •' t •' EP.- « .
'.' "•"-*'"••. :•"- '•'. :'-'. ' ''•"••'• ".c-''7* '• '•
\rteudees: • ;• .'.,•.'". • ' / "'•.••
. ....- ,• . .
.. Sric Hunam.Ashgrove Cement. : .
' .-'. Bob Schrlber, Lafser & Schraibftr ./
• Mike Benoit'. .Cadeiice Cteaacaa - . ,
-Oicdc Stall. FreecSaac, Lwvy,. Kroli 4 Sia»nds
VMD
Bob Hollowny, 'Contois ziatL .Sectlori
Shiva Oorn. Conbuscic.3 Section: ,
Lori Stoll. Radian Corporation "
2I094 .
•r
•
-n.
U)
-------
-------
12:4i
'•"'.'"• - " '-•- .•.f'-?5'/* "'.-•''•• .".' ''
UNITED STATES eNVlRONMEH&L PROTECTION AGENCY
WASMNOTON, 0-C. 204CO . .; .'
~
. .
ANO EWCAOEMCV RtS'ONXI, '
-ffJIIliM teifhi
SUBTECTt
Ceaent Kiln; Combxisticn Capacity Cor- Hazardous > ,
Wast* at Cadcnc* Facilities and BIF Rui A Inpacts
' ''''
101
Las . ....
Analysis end '. Land .Disposal Restriction Section.
" Ftias* I ,LCR_' R«gtilatc3ry
D.
.0'- "
%•
Th« porpoM'-biC this call on Kay 13, 1992, was, to discuss
several subjects- including. th« tnpncc of the Boiler and ^ • ' •• ' ''
•XndttBtricl'-fbznxoa^BZF) rul* cbmpliacoa raeftiir«B«nt» on capacity*
for aludgma andsolids at cadence facilities. Kr. Benoxt /• ;
> suv&arized bis.knowledge to data concerning Ash Grave's • > . -,
facilities capability tormeit the Brr rule requireasents as of .
August 1992 for the 20 ppsc hydrocarbon emission limits ' :
> certification. He reported that one of the Ash Grov* facilities ,\
was having difficulty nesting the 20 ppa hydrocarbon liait. The
Ash.erove Chanuta,: Kansas -facility, -routinely''emits above the 20 .
,'ppn hydrocarbon liBit vben, not utilising hazardous waste derived
fuel. The' reason for the high.and irregular hydrocarbon baseline
was believed to be the result.of natural organic materials within
the feed materials. Bott the source of tho. high levels of .
hydrocarbons and the irrejulsr level or hydrocarbon emissiorve
heed to be understood and controlled In order for conplianc*. He
.also indicated that the other ish Giova facilities were in. .
Various stages of developing, testing, and providing . ' • \ •
docuaentation!to the Kegianal offices for compliance with the 20 <
ppm, hydrocarbon emission limit: . • . . . -
.
CQ
-------
-------
-.;:.' >•- • - . , c-76 '•' •
• . HEMORAHDUK 07 TELEPHONE DISCUSSION
.DATE: May 19, 1992 . . '.'••
TIKE; 2-3 pm
PARTICIPANTS:
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT COUNCIL
• .Richard.Fortuna,. Executive Director
David,' Case ..-•••• ' . • ' •
• ~ ' • • *-.-.' - '
"; • -4 ' , " , r •
EPA ' : : ..' ...•;' . ; •'• . '
.,' Steven Silverman, Off ice'of 'General
. Counsel,
Benigna Carroll, Haste Management
... Division . . .
POBFOSB! On Hay 13, 1992, Mrs. Carroll requested updated . .
information from.the 'Council, on 'the continued management 'of ..and ,'
treatment capacity for soils:contaminated with Third .-"Third .
wastes whose national capacity variance expired.May 8, 1992. ._
..This'discussion'resulted, from that request. .•••'• . ;. .
DISCUSSION: Mr. Silvermah explained that EPA recently received
some information that there are concerns about and some' .
disruptions with the management of mercury, arsenic, and organic '
'constituent contaminated soils which were-under the national ,'
capacity variance that expired May 8, 1992'. : , ." , • •'
Hr. Fortuna said'he received about a half dozen of calls ' • •
about treatment capacity' for 'mercury,'and arsenic .(soils-and non- •
soil wastes).' However, he said he had no updated information on
either: concerns about or capacity for; treating organic- '!.'<
contaminants in soils. . . - " ;' . •. • -. •••..= ' .'.
• -. Mrs..Carroll explained that EPA's methodology for capacity
analysis requires infonaation on available off-site connercial
'capacity'.whose treatment technologies currently are: '. • •':
-retorting for high concentrations of mercury, .
.../ -vitrification for high concentrations of arsenic, and
.. ,,-primarily incineration .(off-site commercial) for !
.' 'organic constituents. • '.; ' . ' .-.- • . .' • . '
• Mr. Fortuna also noted that the situation with'the treatment
of contaminated debris differs from that of the treatment of.
.contaminated soil. For debris,, there.are materials, handling ,
constraints'and the: treatment industry needs time.to bring on . •
line technologies whose standards are expected to.be finalized at.
'the end of June. For soils, current treatment technologies are
'.applicable? however, treataent capacity may be limited.
AQSEEMZKTSJ 'Mr. Fortuna agreed to provide us additional
information on.available; capacity of Council members for treating
these soils especially soils contaminated with organic
constituents. . ..'-"' : ,-' •. - ' ' .' -
isi
^
o-
-------
-------
C-77
Contact: . Ann Elizabeth Loyen. Hazardous WLSIC treatment Council (H\VTC);.
Date:-
June 2,. 1992
.Callers:1 l Berime Carroll. EPA arid Gary Light, ICE Inc. V -; ;: •
Subject: "• Clarification of HWTC's Capacity Information Submittal of June I',' 1992
Report of Discussion:. •' . • ' ' ' • , . . ' > '' •
•;Purpose: ..• ' .' '• ' • •:' ''. •-..'-• "'."'''.'
On June ;i, 1992, the mVTC sent a facsimile to Bengie Carroll of EPA/OSW/CPB
•. summarizing the results ah'intennl.survey of HWTC's member firms to'determihe available
capacity for-soil, Organic Toxjcm- Characteristic (OTC) wastes, and. F037 and F038
\ petroleum-refining wastes. This lelephone, call was intended to.clarify this information. ••.•
Background on the HWTC Survey: . .
The HWTC was 'initiated in the.fall of 199L It initially focussed on contaminated ' •
•'/ soil.'. After several attempts by HWTC to encourage its members to 'respond, 14 companies . . ,
pro%ided information. This information varied considerably in detail. When'H WTC realized
that EPA was Devaluating capaciri- for F037 arid F038, it compiled this information without
additional follow-up and,clarification that was intended. ' ; .' . ,'•'.. ': ^''. •'
" Definition Of Available Capacirj-:. •" '. : •. ., v • '.'•... •. • '' .
EPA sought clarification on whether the capacity information' represented maximum
. .capacity or whether the estimates represented available capacity net of current utilization. .
Ms. Lovett was uncertain of how the capacity terms were defined.in the survey,-but offered'
to send the actual form used to solicit the information. Ms. Lovejt a|sp pointed out that it
was unclear how the capacin' estimates accounted for existing contracts to receive F037 arid
•• Fb38.' ' '."•'-•' -^ "•'•/.. .'.••',. ''•; • ;.' • •' .-• ''• •
' Specificity of Capacity Types: '• . . . .• '.. / .-'•'"' '• '• •
~" • - EPA sought clarification on whether the capacity information provided accounted for
wastcrspecific constraints of F037. and F038 (e.g., .heating value and physical.'form /. .
constraints). Ms. Lovett indicated that the capacity information was requested only at the . •
, ''technology and waste code level. . .. '. ''
Firm or Facility Capacity Information: . . . .'•..'• ; ' • ,
i , . -EPA.'sought clarification regarding whether the.capacity information provided was
1«
-••fsa
' 'O M M*'
o ^. ft
. !-«?.;
Qv-;.:.?-'
- .- -o.
-• .•; o.
-------
-------
,:. ••.-.- :'••'. ' :.'- •-.-'."• ,C-'78 . ;,. ... > .:
available at a facility-specific jevel or whether such. information; which was noted as~
' • necessary for EPA's capacity analysis,-was available. .'Ms,- Lovett indicated that'the
information was provided to HWTC on a.firm-wide basis and that she did.not have authority
to provide firm-specific information. .- , .-• . -'• : " ' . - •' , ' . i.
Commercial Status of Solvent Extraction Capacity: ' ' v •.•'..: "• ..
'. '•• EPA sought to clarify whether the reported solvent extraction capacity was from
. fixed-site commercial facilities or from on-site operations'at petroleum refineries. Ms. Lovett
.. was .unable to clarify. ;•., - " • ' • ' -•"'. ... . . ' •
' CPSCapacity: " . •'• • ,' ..'•',' . '•. ' '' ' •• / . . .'••• .'
"'•'•' EPA sought to clarify what was meant by container processing of solids, Ms. Lovett •,
was unable to clarify. ••'•- . : - ', " -' ;•;.'. • •.'•:'• • • • - ':• . •
Fpllbw-ap: . ••.; -.-. • • v . '• • • . • . • ' • -
«' Ms. Lovett offered to talk to Richard-Fonuna and/or Bill Ziegler to determine.
• whether.they would be able to clarify the information for EPA and whether,HWTC would.-
provide survey responses ffoin specific firms.' ' 1. . ' '••."• '.'.',
..
. :.' d 5~
- •" • tu ^^ *—•
'-. ?|.-S
• s*"*0-
« o.S JT
•. ~-ff.S-
o .
B.
.
'o-
GO
-------
-------
• - . •-.- '•'•-••• • '.'. . • ' ., r .'?o
; - • , • . »•» - 7
Contacts: Bill Zeigler,; Ann Elizabeth Lovett •'. "•
.' Company:. -Hazardous Waste .Treatment Council "••'.'. . ;
. Phone: • -' - •:" ,. .... '"•'-/". -'':'. •.'•'•• ' •'' ' \-
•"•'.-'. •• '-i' • •••'• '••'• /'-••/•'..'.,'... -. '• ' "
Date: 3'June, 1992 . ,. .'; . , , ' • ..>.
Caller: -IBengie Carroll.(EPA), Liset'.e Lambregts (ICF), Gary Light (ICF), Prakash
: ; ' Ramaswamy (ICF) '.-' , . ''.--'. .! '.-,-•
Subject: ..> . .Updated Capacity Information .' .' • , •''•.-.
Report of Discussion: •, . ' ' :; ,
Background and Purpose: •;. "•".,- -f ~ ' ' . ' . A--
- . .-•'"; The^purpose of the conference call was.to clarify^^the information provided by HWTC
in its June 1, 1992 letter to Bengie Carrol!. Iri the spring of 1992, HWTC conducted a
survey, and learned that approximately 10 rbmraerciai combustion facilities have available
treatraerit capacity.; Much'of this is in the form of new equipment or aquisitions, which we
,would.not have been reported by.HWTG members last August. EPA began the discussion
by ejiplaining that it defines "available" capacity as capacity that is in place, tested, permitted,
and.not utilized.', EPA also noted the need for facility-specific information to confirm and
. reconcile with other information.'•,' . / •.
.ThennalkENS Expansion:; ' ' . . •. ~ • -' .. . - ,
"-: "'-. •• -• ~ - :'•• • ' ' •'-' ' ' '•" . •- '.' '-''..''• -,'"' '--<•-,'•
"' .'-"•.•• . TherrnalKEM now owns and operates a lightweight aggregate facility (2 kilns) in New
York that it acquired from Norlite.' They have updated the air pollution control system, and •
are pennilted as an incinerator {the state of NY requires BIFs be permitted as incinerators)
; as of last Thursday. They burn similar feeds as cement kilns, cannot take soilSi have never
.. ,; burned F037/8, require wastes greater than.5 or 6,000,BTU/lb. Are most concerned about
; ' metals;(14 metals in permit). Will begin operating week of 10 June ,1992. Sample analysis
'• . takes 2 weeks. . . V '• . • ' ' . '. ' ." •' ..
' . Qarification: , " . '' .:•• ''.-.,•'
* ;. The capacity estimates they faxed to EPA were aggregated, by facility, and .also by.
, . waste type.1 EPA explained that i/ve have conducted a facility specific capacity analysis, and
.that it is difficult to compare their data with EPA?s. For the F037/8 capacity analysis it is
' . also important to break apart "available capacity by feed;system. HWTC data reported only
"excess", or available capacity, as interpreted by .the respondents. EPA is interested in also
. .' having maximum, and,utilized volumes, for comparison -to its; own data; '• .
,-!f-\:-~'tt.'\y^:'X'\'£'"t':.U-•''• • '•'•; -•••'•"' -\
'.. 1 ?'•*•&•:.": .•i'.^&i'.f;--* :>, '•- ' ; •
•• '•, !*<'-/""/."••'•^•.iv-f?--!"'.-:': '•-'• '•'-' '-.'•'. '• 'c.-:;. •'' --•
Ill
f S3-
8
-------
-------
C-80
: :.HWTC could, not'estimate, rejection rates, commenting that .few of their members
have seen F037/8 and suspects that the F vvastes they have seen are also carrying the K048-
52 codes. .They also commented that, contrary to API's assertion, the amounts of K wastes
•have-been decreasing and that they suspect generators1 have been relabeling K wastes as F
wastes. "• • • . • '.••... ' '. • •.
•••'..--. -. • •' '\ - . • ' '• .
Followiip: . .... •: ; •• . -. • ,. . .
Facility specific information is not available at this time, but HWTC agreed to get.
approval.from .its members and provide Facility specific capacity information. .
•g::«s2
» ? ™" n
•o ." •».•_ 01
o. a ~ x
•,o•• «
n -v <»
c -2
»" r* '
-•-••• §"
-off
n..
O,
..o.
U)
03
M3
-------
-------
-- .
. JUf Bl 'SE 14131-
HflZOTXXS WASTE TT^TMeffCOtMOL
P.i -T"
C-81
!*? Kw Y«k AIMIM, H.W.
,.aaaos-.-•'•
HAZARDOUS VttSTE 7REATMBIT COUNCIL Phone: 2C2/7B3-OS7O
1440 New YorfcArenoa,HW Bnc 202/737-2038
Sufte310 '•;.'• - . ' •' ••'•.'• •-•'••• .. . -. '
DC 20005 ' ' - , • -. -" •
-
-3 a
. X-O'g,
Phone UK
FROM:
tt«DC
Totari Ha
. E»acuStf
a Com},
Datec
,»ttwre is a prabiera and you Jdo oat naoote* al of ibe MhMnfi panes, pteate contact'
'
' . ••r>T-'
lrf*'MMl'«9B
-------
-------
06-02/82 06:39
. JIH si 's
O202 2J2 00»U '
P.E
1)
C-82 •
• Three of fl>e 14 asaptxncA oa oaoeat Itfin rc«?cCty trrhndopea to
owg wiflaMc cgacig of 270^000 T/Y
r ftfffp4 tftM ord^uC uQtuo$ OQiv SLCO **-
pteanodft» tte two jtott tosbodd beon_line by fhc end of I95Q.
wastes, the fTuf^f1 T™1" hsse a rniiJinnia fctdTalue-of 5,000 BTU/Ib. • -
lbeoan«ttVtoh3«cq>Mi^totre«&efanowng
(230,000 T/V and 62,600,000 g/^; ioanminstodioa (JjOOfl^OOO G/V);
H337 end P038 petrcJemn refinery w»sti4(20.000 TyYjmd 18^00,000
O/Y); Pta^ PCB4 and F035
•'
: AsxitsUa dnnent kiln reed to treat ifae .;
foflgoring tasas with flio oapadty, if ayinrtt-Jy j^eofiad, noted '• >
puamtoiaDy; OTC wwte (SjOQQ T^); «xwimmTed SoO (I^OOS.T/y);
PC88 pcttoteom. watts OTjOOO T/y); F03Z, F054andP035 Wtes
md £DS3 TTSSU&. Ono coi^ienjr sated tfcat treatment by indueixtioa is -
nal stsbObsadba. of ioocgmlca, but iMsiJ probably
Sawfandpoafce among aHaxcpsauci. .. • • -•• '':'•' •,, •
• " : Indartaion o^»dty by tfae end of 1993 is expected to be SG^OO :
T/y. C^swav fiw the fisDowing wtttestreana sbooM be «nfi&Ue:OTC
(C,000 T/Y); connontaated soH» (87,000 T/y); F037 and F03S
-IS
s
o
•a
to
**1
.O
o
CD
-------
-------
•s^ieisp"*,,'""' ""*". '' '• •""-••• -"•"»• y-
" . P.3.
••' •.-•-••'• C- 83 •.•"• . ' .-'.
po«ikmrcfln*iywa5t« (60^00 T/y); E088 (SWCO T/y), One cocapoay
. noted tot it b ttnGkcfr to add F032, F034 end ITB5 CBpaaiiy AM to •• •
snocipaaxl inabfll^ or difficntey fa roirrffBg BOAT for related constircems.
That conspany Added tbst ft is imKfccly to pcnae * penmt fiar £088
p«rimf_rt ate gnttgefl anted far tnaneniion.
r I ?»••
-
a • .
a !. «• *
'
One of flic 14 con^isni
MMiMiin^gf
tecboology isnicd to tresu OTC wastes (134,000 T^r-wastcwzter); sod
caotmlBjttdttdls(tlJ8>DOOT/i-). For 1993 da zs^Qshlfi cspacity ii
to reznsin «t 252,000 T/y. ;-
4)
^ vffwift"^ "* aoKnent «^rfr»rtThn to treat Pn37 and •
FQSS petroleom icftiKry WEKCE, wMi it'cairciitsnilaUe treannent c^oiJtj
of 22{y»0 T/y. Only one of ttwse compynfts ptos to expend te cspadty
GSZL oc *^^i^ tithe rate o£.
BunOBtta. The only factOfiestrainiogdiispotealisl
fflftfr"Il >>riifiry •PTtJf^ <
5) ' Mchfla wa^ie-denvetf-fge] pnxMAJin; mnt • ".-. - ' , -..•';•
i '-••.' . -. . • • ~ ':" • , ' • " ,.*• •
V /• 'Pae bi die^^14 coMpurfes uses MVPDF tecfamilpgy, sod tes a. cerrent
««J of 1992. THs tedmnJcgy it ennoitlycied to tataltikft £olto«ing
• wastes: OTC wastes; contaminated jcab; mi 1W//FGBS pecblann. refineiy
onMti. Ij fee cad of 1993, the campsny cnticspstes ninablc capaoty of
. 301^20 tfy far tbo auno &ree wasJ«C«ns. AdcfrtioTial
-------
-------
C-84; .
Oaa of tie 14 compute* uses cyanide alkaline ditonnnffcm .
"\ a owe* available eapsdty of II&OOO T& TUs.
tcctooSDiy insscd to trad oootauiostad soils. For 1993 the available
cssjaritjris opscfed tp renata «t 118.006 T^f.',=
I 53
r=.jr»
•« o
"< Z a
oscs y^ft
t «>BHaUe fear OTC wastes, qvnanilmi>rrt wfls, end
r^fnvay natfeg. By ti» end Of 1993, tta CQtnpailf
' '
tneabtetapadtyof ^^UUOOT^rto flie;'aaiBBifaen .
Th» eoenpmjy anfldpatei fiuthei gro«tii 81 * rsie of 25
' OneoftbeWcotnpBB
a cancat antiUble cmad
wutes; K87 and FD38 p«ro
This bwaaaHe fee ore
(KMOO.OOQ O/V) and
ft ttqp agpooos \rastes Trfth typiafly <100 ppox •tnfrt oijgaimity. -
•o
,o _
to
.o"
o. .-
U)
C3
CO
CD
-------
-------
fjgOPgiS,
P.S
• ...C-85
050
urn sowi
JLVIIIABLE CtSMXT
D CU&CXT? 5T U
•rfYirnirwT^ cU&CXT?
1«92 '
1943
• v»/
I I *
!• , •'
TOS2, FCS4
594.000 t/y •'. • 751,6aO _.
«p,ibo;ooo,?V »o,«oo,ooo e/y
;,— <3*.*<*-,f ISO.OOO
1,000,000 «/y 5,000,000
319,800 V/y 996,130 T/y
23,400,000 o/y ', 33,000,000 c/y
20,000
.10,400,000
24,000
44,500
.10,409,000 6/y
-* ' ' .' ''
74,900 T/y
24,000 C/y
Kotft; da
listed for each Individual
•• oft; a aa
la only an indication o* tu*- capacity nrail«ibl« Sor ttiat
e than OZML
. b« n««d tor
capacity for individual wastastsceaaa
aoftaal total oncall oapacity •
.0
•a-
K)
o-
o
cn
-------
-------
- ;
^^ 1 Utt. • DC, if* 131.
P.I
C-86 .
.
»*•*»
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT COUHCO. Pharie 202/783^)876
1440 New York AVHOue,KW Fax 202/737.2038
SuSe 310 •••'•"- ... . •"'.',. . :••'• ' • - '-"'^Tr ;. •••
Washington, DC 20005 : , . ,
PLEASE OaJVER (ASAP) THE KUlOMflHQ PAGES TO
' -to
FROU: , : .'<'.
' .. Name _•
Company:
Tott to of p^gtsftnotgfli^ covert
4
Mt{.
O-
d
to
' U) -:-
'-, • / • - ' '
Q
-------
-------
' '' C;- 87 ; :
ffWTCCAPM^ SURVEY"
AKPRU 2, Oetotwr 24,1891
.-/.-. '. t't '- ,. . ••»
. * ' -**"» -
If!
,»Zm
"~i.:.
sol? • . ' . • •
PorOTCwastos?'. .'. ' "...-...•• >
For F037, and R038 petafeum n**g wastes?
vasts fe&d betDW and indicate the unuficaerf treawienlcBpadly tar each
tsehootogy- PteesetztoaidJliona) space fnocessajy. ; • ;.,.
Waste TVoe
3 - a
n
'O
to
o
OJ-
OTCWteta
R337. P038
F032.RB4
KD88
cn
-------
-------
r
'•'«*•"""'•
-• -x.
iC-88
What trBZtfment capacity aB
1933 crtetsr for these types erf wass?
Waste Tvoa
^tf«
''
Tarfindacv 1
3- - 4
SOB
FO3T.F03&
RD8
-raea"
4. Watara the toy taoors to making «30E?»cay8vaB*bie7
.Business Deddore
jr?
£'l«
s " <»
O
: O
O
OJ
CQ
— J
-------
r
-------
.'•J
W
UD/UJ-di UiiJB
- •'• JUM 82 '95 i?«az
1 ' :-• ',' /: :. '• .''.'.. 'C.-89'.'.••:•-• • . . . ,- .
.8., ;Ramedtaflon Companies • -• -.' '''.'•'• ;.-: _"• • .• '.• •
. Plaese desoAe «» capacity you- company has to, ntnacfiafion of
oortfifflBtatod sol. Hoy nagy tons/year of sqg do you raiaJUiB tajrantty? How
manradtSScxHl toh/yaar rf sc8 coutt ywi manage h the ftfture, ifthalaxldsposd.
restrfctons ereatid edcfiiond oapaoity domand, md tf» GA^^^Quidancs was adopted as
BOAT?-' - : •;• . . ,,'•.•'; '"''::'" '.'..-
• "'o
-o
.
O
00
on
QC3
-------
-------
C - 90.
Contact: Mike Benoit
Company: Cadence Chemical Resources . . ..••'.
Phone:.. . 401-392-0151 ' '•.'-''' ''.'•. • '
.' Date:, . ' '6/8/92 ' '• . • . ' .. ' ' ( ',.",_
Caller: Gary Light. . -, • . ' '•"_
• Subject: Combustion Capacity at Cadence Facilities and BIF Rule Impacts (Nori-CBI
" Version) •• • •''/" . ••.'••' • •'• • ' " . '" :
• Repbn of Conversatipri: '. ' . ...'..
Cadence Chemical Resources manages the hazardous waste program and/or licenses
its'solid, hazardous waste fuel technology to Ash Grove'Cement Company,. Southdown
Incorporated, and ESSROC Cement Group. The'purpose of'this call was to resolve*
discrepancies in available capacity estimate's for these facilities and to clarify the nature and
extent of reported problems cement kilns are-having as they attempt to certify compliance
with hydrocarbon emission limits required by the BIF rule to maintain interim.status as a
hazardous waste facility.' Conficiential Business Information (CBI) contained in a.CBI
version of this report has been removed in this Non-CBI version. ;
Available Capacity at Each Kiln Equipped with the Cadence System ,'. .
• ; Mr. Benoit summarized his estimation of capacity at each cement kiln unit as follows.
' Each kiln nominally feeds one container (pail or bag) to a kiln per minute (this generally
corresponds to one container per rotation of the kiln). Each pail typically contains 55
pounds of waste, and each kiln operates 85 percent of the year (accounting for winter '
shutdown and other maintenance). Consequently, each kiln can readily accept 40 tons of.
waste.per day (oFj'appnnaniately two truckloads per day): This corresponds to about 12,400
tons of .waste per year. If warranted by demand, each kiln could roughly double this
throughput by either stacking a second container on the feed chute used for wet process
kilns or by doubling the cycle rate of automated feed systems used on preheater-type kilns.
In general Mr.. Benoit estimates that this "doubling" would actually be possible about 50
percent of'the time without potentially compromising. BIF rule compliance.' Mr. Benoit
added that petroleum refining wastes are particularly amenable to such "doubling" due to
their low heating value and relatively consistent physical and chemical properties compared
"to other waste fuels. ; . •• ' ' • : •'"''. •
;.J-.°!jro
"O ~.«- I
- •- .0. O. _ »
o.
U
to
'.-hi • •
'O''
o, •
U)
-------
-------
C-91
Ash Grave Capacity.
' - Seven kilns'at three Ash GroVe facilities arc configured .with the.Cadence technology:
two preheater kilns in Louisville, Nebraska; three wet process ki|ns in Foreman,'Arkansas;'
and two wet process kilns in Chanute, Kansas. Only two of the three kilns at Ash Grove's
Foreman, Arkansas facility generally operate at any. given time. Therefore,' Mr. Benoit.
estimated that Ash Grove's total capacity while feeding one pail per minute is roughly 75,000
ton's'per year (12,400 tons per year at each of six kilns). For wastes, such as petroleum
refining sludges, that are relatively easy to feed at a rate of two pails per minute; Mr. Benoit
estimated Ash Grove's capacity to be. 110,000. tons per .year (18,600 tons per year at each
of six kiln; feeding one pail per minute half of the time and two pails per minute half of the
time). In 1991, Ash Grove burned 2,300 truckloads of wastes containing roughly 20,tons
each or a total of 46,000 tons of containerized wastes. Therefore, Mr. Benoit estimated that
..Ash Grove has roughly 29,000 tons per year of excess capacity burning only one pail per
minute (75,000.-.46,000.tons per year) of about 64,000 tons per year (110,000 - 46,000) if
they feed two/containers per minute about half of the time they are operating.
'•'•.' j ' "^ ' •
Southdown Capacity • .-' . ;,. - . - . ;. •
. • Southdown Incorporated currently operates ont preheater kiln at the Dixie'Cement
plant in KnoxviUe, Tennessee. Mr Benoit did not provide specific maximum or utilized
capacity estimates for this facility, but he .'noted that his discussion-of capacity for each
. individual kilri applies to any .kiln equipped with the Cadence technology. He did report that
this facility has received authorization to burn K048-K052 and has begun burning this waste.
He also noted that the facility has raised its permitted mercury: limit, which had previously
been an obstacle to the facility's ability to accept certain wastes; Mr. Benoit did not know
. if the facility had received approval of its permit modification to accept F037 and F038; but
he believed it had.1 • / .V , •'•••'? '•' ;
ESSROC Capacity , ."_., • ' • "-''"'•
" Mr, Benoit reported that ESSRQC's facility in Logansport, Indiana has recently
equipped its two wet process kilns with the Cadence system. The facility has been receiving
containerized solids since August 1991. The facility is permitted for K048-K052 and has
'been burning K048-K052 as a slurry through the Cemtech suspension system. It has burned
tittle, if any, K048-K052 in containers; Mr. Benoit believes the ESSROC facility is also
permitted for F037 and FQ38, but he was not certain2. :Like other kilns equipped with the
• ' On June 22, '1992, Mr, Benoit submitted comments on [his report conftrmiing [hat (he Dixie Cement
•plant is authorized for P037 and F03i ;'•' .' '"..,'. '• ' . '
S - ; • - '' ' ' . », ' ' / " '
:' 2 ' On June.22, 1992;.-Mr.-' Benolc. subnlcced comments on this report ..
confirising that che' ESSROC plane '.In Logansporc, It\diana Is authorized for F037
. and F038. - ••',-.<'•'•
," a = - o
g - <7 » 2
5«s>S
to
^
o
o
OJ*
—..J
-------
-------
•'*« -.
I-
. '/'.'...-. • . • ' ' : •••'.' '.'. '.' C-92. ;•; '• .''• '" •: : '. ",/ '•_ " '•' .
Cadence system, each of the two kilns at'.this facility has a capacity of 20 tons, per day or
about 12,400 tons per year-burning one pail per minute. '. •> • ;
BIE.Hydrocarbon Limits . .: : : ..
-. /' "Mr. Benpit acknowledged that some cement kilns are.experiencing difficulty with the
20 ppm hydrocarbon emission limits required to certify compliance with the BIF rule interim -
status requirements. He reported that only one of the facilities that use the Cadence system;
'Ash-Grove's Chanute,- Kansas facility,.routinely emits above 20 ppm hydrocarbon from raw
' materials and is therefore having'difficulty meeting BIF rule requirements. - He' provided the
following information on the status of BIF interim status compliance certification at each of
the cement kilns equipped with the Cadence process. Ash Grove has submitted Certification
of Compliance (COC) forms'for one kiln at the Foreman. Arkansas facility,, is conducting
tests for a second kiln in July,' and is working on an equivalency certification for the third.
kiln (equivalency certification allows identical units'to certify compliance based on testing.
..of only one of the units). Ash Grove conducted COC testing at the.Louisville, Nebraska
\ facility in May and plans to submit COC forms by late July. 'Ash' Grove is having trouble
at its Chanute, Kansas facility because the facility hydrocarbon emissions from raw materials
are routinely above 20 ppm, and these levels vary unpredictably.. Mr..Benpit 'does not expect
the facility to cease hazardous waste operations, but it may have to seek a case-by-case
extension of the deadline for certifying'BIF rule compliance. If necessary, the facility will
implement a technology that Ash Grove has developed and is seeking to patent. This
.technology is designed to .enable the kilns to comply with the. BIF hydrocarbon limits.
ESSROC has completed COC testing at its Logansport, Indiana facility and will submit COC
forms by late July, Southdown/Dixie has tested and certified its kiln in Khdxville, Tennessee;
" a
a o. — «
' §VS" '
:.o
•o
O
,.-o
'(A
-------
-------
|