-------
2-36
approximately 20 percent solids. Of the Phase II wastes, the facility is authorized to
receive D018-D040, D042, and D043 wastes.
Ash Grove, Louisville, Nebraska
The Ash Grove Louisville facility currently burns liquid and containerized solid •
waste fuel in two rotary preheater BIFs. Liquid hazardous waste fuel is injected into the
hot end of the kiln, and containerized solids are charged to the calcining zone. Both
kilns operate 7,500 hours a year, slightly less than the "total operating time" of the kilns.
Based on the reported maximum practical capacity and 1992 utilized capacity, EPA
estimates thai the facility has 44,847 tons of liquid combustion capacity available per
year, and 17,558 tons of containerized solids capacity available per year. Ash Grove
reports tin: as burned, their liquids contain approximately 30 percent solids. Of the
Phase II wastes, the facility is authorized to receive DOI8-D040, D042, and D043 wastes.
Citadel Cement Company, Demopotis, Alabama
This facility burns liquid and pumpable sludge hazardous waste fuels in one
preheater kiln. Canisters are injected into the burning zone by compressed air cannons.
This kiln is operational for 1,784 hours a year. The facility reported that as burned, their
liquids contain an average of 25 percent solids. Dnscd on reported maximum practical
burning capacity and 1992 capacity utilization estimates, EPA estimates that the facility
has 6,257 tons per year liquids capacity available, and 2,750 ions per year pumpable
sludge capacity available.
,, Continental Cement Company, Hannibal, Missouri
' Continental Cement currently operates one long wet BIFs, which burns liquid and
bulk solid, and dry solid hazardous wastes. The kiln operates 7,600 hours per year.
Based on reported maximum practical capacity, and 1992 utilized capacity, EPA
estimates the facility's adjusted available liquid waste capacity 10 be 49,389 tons per year,
its available bulk solids capacity to be 17,774 tons per year, and its available dry solids
capacity to be 3,472 tons per year. The facility reports that their liquids, as burned,
contain an average of 25 percent entrained solids.
Dixie Cement Company, Knoxville, Tennessee
This facility burns liquid and containerized solid hazardous waste fuel in one four-
stage cement kiln with preheater and precalciner. The facility reported that as burned,
their liquids contain an average of 30 lo 40 percent solids. The kiln operates 7,850 hours
per year. Based on reported maximum practical feed rales and 1992 waste quantities,
EPA estimates that the facility has 18,219 tons per year solids capacity available, and
10,062 tons per year liquids capacity available. This facility is currently not permitted to
*
O
o
O
03
UO
-------
2-37
receive D018-D043, K141-K145, and K147-KI51 waste codes, but has submitted a permit
modification to add these wastes.
liolnam, Artesia, Mississippi
This Holnam facility is new, and was not operational in 1992. It burns liquid
hazardous wastes in one wet kiln, which is projected to operate 90 percent of the time,
beginning 'in August of 1993. The hazardous waste fuel is injected into the hot end of
the kiln. There was no hazardous waste utilization during 1992. but based on the
reported projected maximum practical capacity, EPA estimates that the facility has
46,300 tons per year available capacity. The facility is authorized to accept DO 18, D019,
D021-D036, and D038-D043 waste codes.
Horaam, Holly Hill, South Carolina
The Holnam facility in Holly Hill burns liquid hazardous waste fuels in two long
wet kilns. Liquid hazardous waste fuel is injected into the hot end of the kiln. The
larger kiln operated 7,400 hours in 1992, however, operation of the smaller kiln was
discontinued during 1992 due to difficulties in meeting the hydrocarbon/carbon monoxide
standard under the BIF rule. EPA estimates that the larger kiln has 23,000 tons per year
liquids capacity available. The facility indicated that it accepts D040-D043 waste codes.
Holnam/Safety Kleen Corp., Clarksville, Missouri
This facility burns liquid hazardous waste fuels in one long wet rotary kiln. Liquid
hazardous waste fuel is injected into the hot end of the kiln. The kiln operates 7,500
hours a year. The facility reported the average solid content of liquids as burned, is 20
percent. Based on reported maximum practical burning capacity and 1992 capacity
utilization estimates, EPA estimates that the facility has 47,479 tons per year liquids
capacity available. This facility has interim status for the following Phase II wastes:
D018, D019, D02I-D030, and D032-D043.
Keystone Cement Company, Bath, Pennsylvania
Keystone Cement Company bums liquid hazardous waste in two wet process
rotary BIFs. These kilns operate 7,850 hours per year. The hazardous waste fuel is
injected into the hot end of the kiln. The facility reported that as burned, their liquids
contain less than IS percent solids. EPA estimates that the facility has 40,035 tons per
year available capacity. This facility is authorized to receive D018-D043 wastes codes.
Lafarge Corporation, Alpena, Michigan
This facility operates five rotary BIFs, but only two are currently burning
hazardous waste. These kilns burn liquids only, and each operates 7,500 hours per year.
o
CO
to
T1
o
o
to
-------
2-38
The facility reported that as burned, their liquids have a 15 percent solid content. EPA
estimates that together the loins have 8,000 tons of capacity available per year. Lafarge
intends to burn hazardous waste in the three kilns that are not currently burning
hazardous waste, but must first satisfy numerous construction and regulatory
requirements. Lafarge estimates they will be on line burning liquid waste by 1994 (survey
says no changes to burning practices planned before July 1994). The facility also plans to
install a sludge handling system at some unspecified point in the future. The facility is
authorized to receive D018, D019, D021-30, and D032-42 waste codes.
Lafarge Corporation, Fredoaia, Kansas
This facility operates two rotary BIFs. Both burn liquid hazardous waste streams.
The facility reported that as burned, their liquids contain an average of 25 percent solids.
The smaller kiln operates about 7,800 hours per year, while the larger one averages 7,600
hours. EPA estimates this facility is utilizing all of its dry solids combustion capacity and
has about 1,000 tons of liquids capacity available. The facility is authorized to burn
DOlb, D019, D021-30, and D032-42 wastes.
Lafarje Corporation, Paulding, Ohio
This facility burns liquid and pumpable sludge hazardous waste fuel in two rotary
BIFs. Lafarge reports that this facility's liquids, as burned, contain approximately 10
percent solids. One of the kilns operates approximately 8,100 hours per year, the other
7,800 hours. EPA estimates this facility has 4,868 tons per year of available liquid
capacity and 1:546 tons of available pumpable sludge capacity. Lafarge has indicated in
the past that dry solids capacity would be added. Although the 1993 survey did not
include mention of dry solids capacity, additional containers and bulk solids capacity were
indicated for 1994-1995. The facility is authorized to burn D018, D019, D021-30, and
D032-42 wastes.
Lone Star Alternate Fuel Company, Cape Girardeau, Missouri
This facility burns liquid hazardous waste fuels and containerized solids in one
precalciner kiln. Pumpable liquids are injected at the hot end, and containerized solids
are fed via air cannon. The kiln is operational for 7,440 hours per year. Lone Star
reported that as burned, this facility's liquids contain an average of 25 percent solids.
EPA estimates that the facility has 31,457 tons per year liquids capacity available and
2,346 tons per year containerized solids capacity available.
Lone Star Industries, Green Castle, Indiana
This facility burns liquid and containerized solid hazardous waste fuel in one long,
wet process rotary cement kiln. The facility reported that as burned, their liquids contain
an average of 20 percent solids. The liquid waste fuel is injected into the hot end of the
' ill
lift
Bsfs!
•ft1
O
C/J
K)
71
O
O
-------
2-39
kiln, and solids are reground with bulk liquid and fed as pumpable liquid at hot end (one
gallon plastic jugs are injected at hot end). The kiln burns liquid waste fuel for 5,500
hours a year, and burns containerized solids for 2,350 hours a year. EPA estimates that
Lone Star has no liquid combustion capacity available, nnd 7,668 tons per year capacity
available for containerized solids. This facility is authorized to burn D018, D019, D021-
30, and D032-42 wastes.
National Cement Company, Lebec, California
This facility burns liquid hazardous waste in one long, dry process cement kiln.
Waste fuel is injected into the hot end of the kiln. The facility reported that as burned,
their liquids contain an average of 10 percent solids. National Cement operates an
average of 6,756 hours per year. EPA estimates that the facility has 7,700 tons of
capacity available per year. This facility is authorized to burn DO 18, DO 19, D021-26,
D028, D035, D039 and D040 wastes.
Safety Kleen Envfrosystems, Dorado, Puerto Rico
This facility bums liquid hazardous waste in one dry process kiln. Hazardous
waste feed is pumped into the hot end of the kiln. This kiln operates an average of
6,000 hours per year. The facility has two more kilns, but did not indicate why these
other kilns are not expected to burn hazardous wastes by July 1994 EPA estimates that
the kiln has 44,547 tons per year of available capacity. This facility is authorized to burn
D018, D019, D021-43 wastes. . , '
Texas Industries, Incorporated, Midlothian, Texas
This facility burns liquid hazardous waste fuels in four rotary kilns. Each of these
kilns operates 8,300 hours per year. The facility reported that as burned, their liquids
contain an average of 8 percent solids (maximum 30 percent .suspended solids). EPA
estimates that the facility has 164,000 tons per year liquids capacity available. This
facility is authorized to bum DO 18, DOI9, D021-30, D032, D033, and D035-43 wastes.
23.2 Commercial BIFs Not Included in the CKRC Survey
EPA is aware that additional BiFs are burning hazardous waste that did not
submit 1993 CKRC surveys. These facilities include Carolina Solite (Albermarle, NC),
ESSROC (Logansport, IN), Florida Solite (Green Cove Springs, FL), Giant Cement
(Harleyville, SC), Heartland Cement (Independence. KS), Kentucky Solite (Brooks,
KY), Medusa (Wampum, PA), North Texas Cement (Midlothian, TX), River Cement
(Festus, MO), Solite {Arvonia, VA), Solite (Cascade, VA), and Southdown (Fairborn,
O
c/)
to
71
o
2
UD
-------
O
2-40
OH}9. An additional facility, Holnam (Ada, Oklahoma), is not operating but it does
have interim status. It is currently negotiating with state officials for final approval. This
facility is not included in the capacity analysis.
To present a complete picture of available commercial combustion capacity, the
Agency has supplemented the analysis with information contained in the September 1993
El Digest10. El Digest provides the quantity of hazardous waste burned in 1992 and
the maximum practical burning capacity. The waste quantities are not allocated, though
among waste forms (e.g., liquids and solids). To overcome this obstacle for facilities that
burn multiple waste forms, the Agency applied percentage utilization factors for each
waste form at each facility based on data submitted in the 1991 CKRC Survey.
' Maximum and utilized capacities for each waste form have been incorporated into the
analysis. Brief individual facility profiles are presented below based on information
contained in the 1992 CKRC Survey and the September 1993 El Digest.
Carolina Solite, Albemarle, North Carolina
This lightweight aggregate facility has an interim status BIF permit. It burns liquid
wastes in four kilns. The facility did not bum wnslc in 1992. EPA estimates their
current liquid waste burning capacity as 22,000 tons.
ESSROC, Logansport, Indiana
This facility burns liquid hazardous waste fuel in two wet process BIFs. The
Agency estimates that this facility has 11,000 tons per year of available capacity for
liquids and 4,000 tons per year available for containerized solids. Of the Phase II wastes,
this facility accepts D018-43, K14M45, K147-148, and K149-151.
Florida Solite, Green Cove Springs, Florida
This lightweight aggregate facility has an interim status BIF permit. Florida Solite
is currently operating one of its three kilns for burning liquid wastes. The facility did not
burn waste in 1992. EPA estimates their current available capacity at 11,000 tons of
liquid wastes. Of the Phase II wastes, this facility is permitted to burn DO 18-043, K141-
145 and K147-I4S.
O
o
O
* Marine Shale Processors (Amelia, LA) is not included in ihc iiniil^is due 10 ongoing enforcement actions. In 1992,
the repotted liquids capacity »as 200,000 tons and 80,000 inni i>f u:uic »crc burntd.
* 'Industrial Furnaces 1993", El Ditesl. Stpicmbtr 19">V
UJl
j
-------
2-41
Giant Cement Company, Hariejviile, South Carolina
This facility bums liquid and dry solid hazardous waste in four wet process BIFs.
Both types of wastes are fed into the hot end of the kiln. The facility reports that their
liquids, as burned, contain an average of 20 percent entrained solids. EPA estimates that
together the kilns have 22,500 tons per year liquid combustion capacity available, and
13,500 tons per year available capacity for dry solids. Of the Phase II wastes. Giant
Cement is permitted to receive DO 1 8-4 3 wastes.
Heartland Cement Company, Independence, Kansas
This facility bums dry solids in four dry process BIFs. They each feed dry solid
hazardous waste into the hot end of the kiln. EPA estimates that together the four kilns
have 23,450 tons per year available capacity for dry solids. Of the Phase II wastes, the
facility is authorized to bum D018-D043 wastes.
Kentucky Solite, Brooks, Kentucky
Kentucky Solite has an interim status BIF permit. This facility burns solid wastes
in three aggregate kilns. EPA estimates that the facility has 7,000 tons of available solid
waste bunting capacity.
Medusa Cement, Wampum, Pennsylvania
This facility bums liquid and sludge hazardous waste in three long dry process
BIFs. Solids are ground and mixed into the liquid sitcam, before being injected into the
kilns. The facility reported that as burned, their liquids contain an average of 25 percent
solids. EPA estimates that the facility has 25,400 tons per year liquid capacity available,
3,900 tons per year pumpable sludge capacity, and 700 tons per year npnpumpable
sludge capacity available. The facility is authorized to burn D018, DO 19, D021-36, D03S,
D039, D042 and D043 wastes. D020, D037, D040 and D041 are acceptable in trace
amounts.
North Texas Cement, Midlothian, Texas
This facility bums liquid wastes. The facility hns an interim status BIF permit, and
has not burned commercially since April 1991. [IPA estimates that North Texas has
49,000 tons of available liquids burning capacity.
River Cement, Festus, Missouri
River Cement burns liquid and sludge h:iz:udous waste fuel in two dry process
BIFs. The facility reports that their liquids, as burned, contain an average of 20 percent
entrained solids. The facility filters liquid hazardous waste and grinds sludges, before
» !» »
-gsr*
3
O
GO
i
o
o
UD
-------
2-42
blending the two and pumping the hazardous waste fuel into the hut end of the kiln.
EPA estimates that the two kilns have 10.500 tons per year liquid hazardous waste
capacity available, 3,750 tons per year pumpable sludge capacity available, and 750 tons
per year nonpumpable sludge capacity available. The facility is authorized to burn D018,
D019, D02I-36, D038, D039, D042 and D043 wastes. D020, D037, D040 and D041 are
acceptable in trace amounts,
Solite-Arvonia, Arvonia, Virginia
This Solite facility has an interim status BIF permit. It operates four kilns that
burn liquid wastes. Solite-Arvonia's available liquids burning capacity is estimated by
EPA to be 7,000 tons. Of the Phase II wastes, this facility is permitted to bum DO 18-043.
Solite-Cascade, Cascade, Virginia
Sob'te-Cascade has an interim status EtF permit. The facility burns liquid wastes
in four kilns. EPA estimates its available liquid burning capacity at 18,000 tons. Of the
Phase II wastes, this facility is permitted to burn DO 18-043.
Southwest Portland Cement Co., Inc, Fair born, Ohio
Southwesl's Fairbom, Ohio facility burns liquid hazardous wastes in one dry
process cement kiln with preheater. The facility reported in the 1991 CKRC survey that
their liquids, as burned, contain less than 5 percent entrained solids. The waste fuel is
injected into the hot end of the lain. Based on reported maximum practical feed rates
and 1991 waste quantities, EPA estimates that the facility has 19,370 tons per year of
liquid combustion capacity available. At present it is only permitted to burn
characteristic metal wastes, D001, and F001, F002, F003, and F005. It is modifying its
RCRA permit to receive additional wastes, including the Phase II waste codes DO 18,
D019, D021-30, D032-40, and D043.
23.5 Commercial BIF Capacity for Soils
The CKRC survey did not specifically request capacity data for the combustion of
soils. However, facilities were asked if soils could be accepted for burning. Of the 18
facilities that responded to the CKRC survey, 16 explicitly indicated that they do not
accept hazardous soils. Two facilities, Continental Cement (Hannibal, MO) and
Southdown (Knoxville, TN), reported that thsry could accept hazardous soils, and that this
capacity can be considered part of their solids capacity. The Agency believes that,
because soil alone generally has a very low heating value, facilities are blending soils with
other hazardous wastes having high heating values, or .ire using contaminated soil as an
ingredient rather than for energy recovery. The Agency's evaluation of heating value
limits provided by Continental and Southdown supports the contention that BIFs
generally cannot accept soil as a large peregrine of their feed (i.e., without extensive
•Soggo
fr rt 2 ,8 M
• 8*sr
o
o
o
UQ
un
-------
2-43
blending). Exhibit 2-8 summarizes the minimum heats of combustion reported at each of
the facilities that report accepting soils.
EXHIBIT 2-8
REPORTED MINIMUM HEATS OF COMBUSTION At CEMENT KILNS
THAT ACCEPT HAZARDOUS WASTES
Facility/Location
Continental Cement
Hannibal, MO
Souihdown
Knoivil!e,TN
Minimum Allowable Haling Value
(BTU/ID) As Received
Bulk
Solids
5.000
n/r
Diy
Solids
5.000
n/r
Containerized
Solids
n/f
5.000
Minimum Allowable Heating Value
(BTU/lb) As Burned
Bulk
Solids
8.000
n/r
Dry
Solids
8.000
n/r
Containerized
Solids
n/r
n/r
Note W radkaia UK iafonutiwi wn oat repotted
o
C/3
to
71
o
o
O
2.4 OTHER TREATMENT SYSTEM CAPACITIES
•This section discusses commercial treatment capacity other than combustion.
Specifically, it presents EPA's capacity analysis for stabilization, biological treatment, and
chemical precipitation. Section 2.4.1 discusses the general approach and assumptions "
EPA used for estimating available capacity for these technologies, and Section 2.4.2
summarizes available capacity for newly listed and newly identified wastes regulated
under the Phase II LDR rule.
2.4.1 General Approach and Assumptions
In analyzing alternative treatment capacity for stabilization, biological treatment,
and chemical precipitation for newly listed and identified wastes, the Agency built on the
capacity analyses conducted for the Third Third LDR rule. This analysis was based on
data contained in the May 1990 TSDR Capacity Data Set.11 The TSDR Capacity Data
Set contains results from the National Survey of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage,
Disposal and Recycling Survey (the TSDR Survey). The TSDR Survey was administered
in 1987 to 2,500 facilities and was designed to provide comprehensive information on
current and planned hazardous waste management, and practices at RCRA-permiUed
" US. EPA, ComawKiel Trttamuu.'Recorerji Data Sri, May I WO.
ch
-------
;•"*"
2-44
and interim status treatment, storage, recycling, and disposal facilities. The TSDR Survey
collected projections of capacity changes from 1986 through 1992. The TSDR Capacity
Data Set includes the amount of hazardous and nonhazardous waste entering each
treatment system in 1936, the maximum hazardous waste capacity, and the maximum
total waste capacity.
For prior LDR rulemakings, EPA updaied the TSDR Capacity'Data Set for
critical technologies based on confirmation of planned capacity changes, and other
information received since the survey (e.g., comments on proposed rules). Updaied
information was obtained by contacting facilities and verifying critical projected capacities
reported in the TSDR Survey. Based on the information provided by facility contacts,
EPA determined whether planned facility capacity had come on line as projected. For a
more detailed explanation of the TSDR Survey and of the Third Third Rule refer to U.S.
EPA, Background Document for Tliird Third Wastes to Support 40 CFR Pan 268 Land
Disposal Restrictions, May 1990.
2.4.2 Summary of Available Capacity for Biological Treatment, Chemical Precipitation,
and Stabilization
Exhibit 2-9 summarizes required and available capacities of commercial treatment
systems appropriate for newly listed and identified wastes covered in the Phase II rule.
The 1994 baseline available capacity is the updated maximum (updated as described
above) net of the 1986 baseline utilized capacity. The 1994 baseline does not reflect any
capacity required as a result of prior LDR rales. To estimate the capacity available for
newly identified wastes, the capacity demand for previous LDR rules was subtracted from
the 1994 available baseline capacity. For individual facility data refer to the TSDR
Capacity Data Set.
o
o
o
—J
-------
r
2-45
EXHIBIT 2-9
AVAILABLE COMMERCIAL CAPACITY FOR PHASE II
NEWLY LISTED AND IDENTIFIED WASTES"
H. ~ 5 »*
Pits
Technology
Biological Treatment
Chemical Precipitation
S'abilization
1994
Baseline
Arailable
Capacity
(1000 tpy)
196
1,414
3,125
Capacity
Required
for LDR
Rules Prior
to 1992
(Tons/year)
8,000
600,000
1,921,000
Capacity
Required for
Phase I
Wastes
(Tons/year)
< 1.000
< 1,000
77,000
Capacity
Available for
Phase II
Wastes
(Tons/year)
187,000
813,000
1.127,000
* Toub nuy be ineuct due lo rouBdin|.
Source Baclyaind Documaafor JJlirrf Third Wtaa to S*ff>~t 40 CfR P<*1168 Land Cifxunf Raoiaioni. Miy 1990, ipd
BeJwourtDaWwferCafaciirAnatfaifvKt** LduJ M Uun «kl Haur&xu Dthrii m Support 40 CFR 26f La*
Kamamarieaaiu. June tin
o
-------
CHAPTER 3
CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC WASTES
This chapter discusses the required treatment capacity analysis (i.e., the demand
for alternative commercially available treatmeni) conducted for the newly identified •
tenacity characteristic (TC) pesticide wastes (D012-D017) and ihe newly identified TC
organic wastes (D018-D043). Section 3.1 provides background information on the
regulatory history of these wastes, the treatment standards being considered for this rule,
and an overview of how EPA assessed the required treatment capacity for these wastes.
Section 3.2 describes the data sources that were consulted and developed to collect the
information required for the capacity analysis. Section 3.3 explains the detailed method-
ology used for the analysis of required treatmeni capacity, discusses the factors affecting
the analysis of TC pesticide wastes (D012-D017) find TC organic wastes(D018-D043),
and provides estimates of the quantities of these wn.stes requiring commercially available
treatment. Lastly, Section 3.4 presents the results'of the capacity analysis.
Today's rule establishes treatment standards fur all newly identified TC organic
wastes that are managed in units other ih.in: 1) waslcwater treatment systems which
includ : surface impoundments and whose ultimate discharge is subject to the Clean
Water Act (CWA); 2) zero-dischargers who. before land disposal of the wastewater, treat
the wastewater in a CWA equivalent system; or 3} Class I non-hazardous underground
injection wells subject to the Safe Drinking Water Act (SOWA) Underground Injection
Control (UIQ program. EPA is deferring regulattun of these TC wastes until the Phase
III rulemaking, so that EPA may consistently consider these wastes with other wastes
impacted by the D.C. Circuit Court decision issued September 25, 1992 (Chemical Waste
Management v. EPA, 976 F. 2d 2). This court decision addressed the regulation of
characteristically hazardous ignitable, corrosive, and reactive wastes under the Third
Third Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) rule. The court decision responded (o several
challenges to the Third Third LDR Rule that were brought by various petitioners,12
including challenges to provisions allowing dilution ;is a treatment to remove some
11 This court deosioa consolidated thirteen separate cases before ihc court. The coun grouped the petitioners into
several groups. The "NRDC petitioner*' »ere coropnvd of ihe )fii/:irdnus Waste Treatment Council. The
Emiranmenul Defeat Fund, the Sierra Out), and the Natural KCUUIICM Defenx Council. The 'Industry petitioners*
were comprised of (be CScmical Manufacturers AUUIKKVI. The I ernluer Institute, Chemical Waste Management, the
American Petroleum Institute. RSR Corporation, me American Mining Congress, me American Iron and Steel Institute,
the Dow Chemkal Company, the American Paper I.iuituie. ihe Mammal Forest Products Association, the Specialty Steel
Industry of UK United States, and the Edison Elcctnc Institute. Other petitioner} included Ihe Edde Corporation,
Honetead Resource Development Company,Inc.. the Zinc Corporuimn of America, the Aluminum Association, Ihe
Secondary Lead Sachet], me Auociatioa of Battery Rrcyctcrs, the Nniunul Association of Metal Finishers, the Battery
Council tnternaliocal, the Lead Industries Association. Inc., rte Cadmium Council. El. du Pont de Nemours &
Company, Allied-Signal Corporation, the Institute of Mikcr* pf [ jrtluwei, 'Ihiafcol Corporation, and Oiin Corporation.
a » j
2~i
5 ™ «• >• '
0.0.5. "
'its
5?s-
o
GO
i
O
O
-------
3-2
hazardous characteristics13. The decision remanded ihc dilution provisions at 40 CFR
268.1 for wastes managed in Oass I deep injection wells subject to the requirements of
the Safe Drinking Water Act (SOWA), and at 40 CFR 268.3 for wastes managed in
centralized wastewater treatment systems subject «> ihc Clean Water Act (CWA).14
Consequently, TC wastewaters and other liquid wastes 1) managed in surface impound*
ments regulated under the Clean Water Act, 2) managed in CWA-equivalent systems15
prior to ultimate land disposal, or 3) disposed of in Class I underground injection wells
regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act are not being addressed in this rulemaking;
they will be addressed in the upcoming LDR rulemaking to allow the Agency sufficient
time to address the regulatory overlap between KCKA, SDWA, and CWA. Because
EPA believes that most TC wastewaters will be managed in one of the three types of
systems listed above, the analysis presented in this chapter considers only the required
treatment capacity for TC nonwastewaters.
3.1 BACKGROUND
Section 3001 of RCRA specifies the criteria fur identifying characteristics of
hazardous wastes. One such characteristic is the tnxicity of the waste. The original test
for toxicity was the Extraction Procedure (EP), a laboratory test that evaluated the
potential teachability of specific constituents from a w.-iste. In 1980, EPA promulgated a
set of regulatory levels for 14 constituents16 and the protocol for the EP test. The use
of the EP test to determine whether the concentration of any of the 14 constituents in an
extract of ihe waste exceeded the regulatory levels defined the criteria whereby a waste .
exhibited the hazardous waste characteristic of toxiciiy. In the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA), section 3001 was amended to direct the EPA
10 8, jr W°
l5?lo
o
GO
to
*Tl
I
O
o
.*>
0 In pan, UK NRDC petitioners asserted that (1) the rule's ikacirvatxm standard allowed impermissible dilution in
some cases, rather than treatment with specfic technologies; and (2) the rule allowed placemen! of untreated formerly
characteristic wastes into surface impoundments regulated under the (lean Water Act, or into Class [ non-hazardous •
underground injection «U§ regulated under the Safe Drinking V.jttr Act, thereby violating the intenl of RCRA.
" The court deosioo vacated some parts of the Third Third rule and remanded others. Vacated rule are no longer
in effect (once the court's mandate issues), whereas remanded nilu rcrmun in force until EPA acts to replace them.
This distinction bat considerable significance witn respect to LDR treatment ctundards. II a proiously promulgated
treatment standard tor a waste is vacated, that waste is now effccioety prnhibiicd from land disposal because airy »aste
thai would IK land disposed would be land disposed without tenifli firvi hccn treated to the standard previously
established by EPA (assuming thai the »as:e is not being land disputed in a lurid disposal unit with an approved no-
migration petition). A remanded treatment staadard, on the otlxr ruoJ. remains in cdcct, and disposal of wastes treated
to the remanded treatment standard is leal until the standard is amended.
" CWA-equivalcat treatment includes biological treatment fur nrjpnici. alltaline chlorinalkxi or ferrous sulfate
precipitation for cyanide, precipUation/scdmentaLon for metals, leductxin of hexavalcnt chromium, or other treatment
technology thai can be dernoaMrated to perform equally or greater irun ihcse technologies (see 53 Federal Register
29364. May 24. 1993).
" These constituents were Ihe meu'j z^ftx (D004), banum (IXOI), c.idmium (D006), chromium (D007), lead
(D008), mercury (D009), selenium (D010) aad shTr (DO11). Md me pcMicuJcs Endrin (DOi:), Lindane (DOB),
Melhorychlor (0014), Touphcne (D015X 14-0 (DO 16). and l.H-11> (Silvex) (0017).
'"U
CD
-------
3-3
t
Administrator to "examine the extraction procedure loxiciry characteristic... and make
changes ... as are necessary to ensure that it accurately predicts the leaching potential of
wastes" (RCRA section 3001 (g)). In addition, ihe Administrator was charged with the
identification of "additional characteristics of hazardous waste, including measures or
indicators of toricity".
In response to HSWA, EPA proposed the Toxicity Characteristic (TC) rule on
June 13, 1986, and promulgated the final TC rule on March 29, 1990 (55 FR 1 1798). The
TC rule established the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) as a
replacement for the HP test. In addition, the rule expanded the criteria whereby wastes
exhibit the hazardous waste characteristic of toxicily by establishing regulatory levels for.
25 new organic constituents (D018-D043). Generators of newly identified TC wastes
were required to submit RCRA section 3010 notificntions to EPA, and facilities managing
tr*ese wastes were required to submit Part A permit modifications or new permit
applications to EPA by September 25, 1990 (or by Miirch 29, 1991 for small quantity
generators).
For the purposes of the LDRs, newly identified TC wastes have been divided into
two categories. The first category are the newly identified TC organic wastes. This
category consists of wastes that have been identified us hazardous because of the
presence of one or more of the newly regulated organic constituents. The new waste
codes and the corresponding organic constituents arc presented in Exhibit 3-1. The
second category, the newly identified pesticide wastes, is comprised of the TC pesticide
wastes that were determined not to be hazardous when tested using the old EP test, but
are now hazardous when tested using the new TCLP. The constituents for which these
wastes are regulated, and the appropriate codes arc presented in Exhibit 3-2.
Nonwastewater forms of TC organic wastes and all forms of TC pesticide wastes
are subject to the universal treatment standards in today's rule. These universal treat-
ment standards are based on existing treatment data, which is based on some form of
thermal destruction (typically incineration) as the ficsl Demonstrated Available
Technology (BOAT) for treating these wastes.
A regulation related to today's rule is the fin;il listing determination for used oil
(57 FR 21524, May 20, 1992). Used oil may also exhibit ihe TC due to the presence of
benzene and other constituents. The Agency has determined that it is unnecessary to list
used oil that is being disposed as hazardous because the TC rule adequately defines
those used oils that should be regulated as hazardous wastes. Therefore, under today's
a There are 26 new wane codes and 25 new consii!ue.-,a tccmv itie regulatory level for loul ncsols (D026) a used
if conccnuatioas for o-, m-, and p-cresol cannot be dciernuned wiwf.iirty.
o
i
O
O
Oj
C3
-------
3-4
EXHIBIT 3-1
NEWLY IDENTIFIED TC ORGANIC WASTES
AND CORRESPONDING ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS
nl
III
D018 - Benzene
D019 - Carbon tetrachloride
D020 - Chtordane
D021 - Chlorobenzene
D022 - Chloroform
D023 - o-Cresol
D024 - m-Cresol
D025 - p-Cresol
D026 - Cresol
D027- 1,4-DichIorobenzene'
D028 - 1,2-Dichloroethane
D029 - 1,1 Dichloroethylene
D030 - 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
D031 • Hepiachlor and
Heptiichtor epoxidc
D032 • Hexachlorobenzene
D033 - Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
D034 - Hexachloroelriane
D035 - Methyl ethyl ketone
D036 - Nitrobenzene
D037 - Pentachlorophenol
D038 - Pyridine
D039 - Tetrachloroethylene
D040 - Trichloroethylen?
D04I • 2,3.5'TrichIorophenol
D042 - 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
D043 • Vinyl chloride
EXHIBH 3-2
NEWLY IDENTIFIED PESTICIDE WASTES
AND CORRESPONDING ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS
D012-Endrin
D013 - Ltndane
D014 • Methoxychlor
D015 - Toxaphene
DO! ft • 2.4-D
DO 17 - 2.4.5-TP (Silvex)
la*
|ss
H
O
O
O
CD
-------
3-5
O
rule, used oil that is not recycled and that exhibits the TC would be subject to the land
disposal restrictions.18
3.2 DATA SOURCES
This section discusses the major data sources used to perform the required
capacity analysis for newly identified TC wastes. Section 3.2.1 discusses the 1992 Survey
of Organic Toxicity Characteristic Wastes Managed in Land Disposal Units (TC Survey).
This survey was the main source of data on the generation and management of newly
identified organic TC wastes (D018-D043) used in this ;m:i lysis. Section 3.2.2 discusses
some of the comments received in response to the Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule-
making (56 FR 55160) regarding the newly identified TC wastes. Section 3.2.3 discusses
comments received in response to the Phase II proposed rule.
~2.\ 1992 Survey of Organic Toxicity Characteristic Wastes Managed in Land Disposal
Units (TC Survey)
In the spring of 1992, EPA conducted a census of 139 facilities that disposed of
newly identified TC organic wastes in land disposal units ur underground injection wells.
EPA identified the universe primarily based on those who had submitted RCRA permit
modifications or received interim status for managing these wastes. For each facility,
EPA requested waste stream-specific data on newly identified TC organic wastes and
information about on-site land disposal units and treatment and recovery systems.
The purpose of the TC Survey was to obtain estimates of the quantities of newly
identified organic TC wastes (D018-D043) that are currently being managed, and that
would be managed, in land disposal units (i.e., landfills, Iqnd treatment units, surface
impoundments, waste piles and underground injection wells) from 1991 to 1995. These
waste quantities will require alternative commercially available treatment capacity prior
to land disposal upon promulgation of the LDRs for these wastes. The data reported in
the TC Survey were 1991 data. EPA used this baseline data to project demand for
alternative treatment from 1992 to 1995, taking into account such factors as planned
waste minimization activities, construction of on-site treatment capacity, and anticipated
changes in waste management practices at individual facilities, as reported by the
respondents to the TC Survey. EPA also requested estimates on quantities of newly
identified TC organic wastes that are not currently land disposed, yet would require
alternative treatment prior to land disposal (e.g., tank clean out sludges that will be
generated in the future from tanks that replace surface impoundments). EPA used the
results of the survey to support the required capacity analysis conducted for today's rule.
The TC Survey also collected data on hazardous soil and debris contaminated with TC
organic wastes. Appendix D contains a sample of the TC Survey questionnaire.
" Used oil itoa a recycled is noi subject 10 ihe land dapsvii rx-K.Tcm.w (JO CFR »l.6(a) and {b)).
O
GO
i
O
O
ru
UU
-------
3-6
3.2.1.1 Identification of Population
This section describes the data sources EPA used to identify the facility
population for the TC Survey. It includes a brief description of the data sources and how
EPA used the information to determine the final list of facilities.
Survey:
EPA used three primary data sources to identify the target population for the TC
National Survey or Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, Disposal, and
Recycling Facilities (TSDR Survey). EPA mailed the TSDR Survey in the
fall of 1987 to approximately 2,500 facilities (hat managed hazardous waste
on site. These facilities included all of the 2,400 RCRA-permitt?d or
interim status treatment, disposal, or recycling facilities, plus about 100 of
the 700 RCRA permitted storage facilities. The TSDR Survey requested
information on hazardous waste quantities and management practices for
the calendar year 1986, as well as any projected changes in hazardous waste
management capacity prior to 1992.
Because the TSDR Survey reflects 1986 hazardous waste management
practices, it does not directly provide information on facilities managing
newly identified TC organic wastes; these wastes were not identified as
hazardous until 1990. For identifying (he target population to receive the
TC Survey, EPA used the TSDR Survey for information on the type of
land disposal units at a facility.
Hazardous Waste Data Management System (HWDMS). HWDMS was
developed in the early 1980's to track (he activities of the RCRA-regulated
community. EPA regional offices entered data on facilities generating and
managing hazardous waste into ten regional data bases.
EPA used HWDMS to gather information on facilities operating land
disposal units that had submitted applications to modify their RCRA
permits, on the assumption that some of these modifications were to
manage TC organic wastes.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS). As the
RCRA program changed (particularly as a result of HSWA), greater
'authority was increasingly being given to the states for administration of the
RCRA program. Fitting the additional data requirements into the existing
HWDMS data base structure became increasingly difficult, and OSWER
designed RCRIS as a replacement data base for HWDMS. RCRIS con-
tains information on hazardous waste handling facilities, including the
facility name, location, mailing addrcvi. owner name and address, types of
O
o
O
CD
-------
3-7
i
activity (generator, transporter, burner/blender), and the types of hazardous
waste handled. A facility that treats, stores, or disposes of hazardous waste,
roust obtain a RCRA permit, which consists of two parts, referred to as
Part A and Part B. EPA enters all of the Part A information into RCRIS,
as welt as the process codes and design capabilities for the hazardous waste
treatment units from Part B. If a facility is required to undertake correc-
tive action activities, EPA enters into RCRIS information on these activities
including the type of contamination, the remedial activities planned, and
the instrument (permit or order) by which corrective action is required.
For identifying the TC Survey population, RCRIS provided information on
whether the owner or operator of a hazardous waste TSDR facility had
submitted an application to modify Part A or Part B of their RCRA permit
to manage newly identified TC organic wastes.
EPA verified the information in the above data sources in several ways. EPA's
Office of Solid Waste, Permits and State Programs Division, obtained from each EPA
region a list of facilities that had submitted Part A applications or Part B modifications
for the generation or management of TC organic wastes. Using this information, EPA
verified the data provided by the TSDR Survey, HWDMS, and RCRIS, and also
identified an additional fifty potential survey participants. EPA's Office of Water, Under-
ground Injection Control (UIC) Branch, obtained, from each region, information on
facilities that operated Class I injection wells and were believed to inject TC wastes. The
Chemical Manufacturers Association also provided (to UIC Branch) information on
facilities it believed to be injecting TC wastes. EPA also contacted the Regional Offices
to inquire about additional facilities. When EPA found inconsistencies in the data
sources, the Agency contacted the Regional Offices to verify the information obtained
regarding these facilities; when the Regional Offices did not have the necessary informa-
tion, EPA contacted the State agencies.
EPA assumed that commercial facilities would manage some of the newly
identified TC organic wastes after the LDRs became effective, as hazardous waste
generators chose not to treat the waste themselves. Consequently, all commercial
landfills and surface impoundments were included as potential survey participants.
As a result of these data base searches and telephone calls to regions and states
described above, EPA initially identified -100 facilities as potential survey participants.
EPA called each facility to verify that the facility was managing newly identified TC
organic wastes in land disposal units. Based upon this screening, EPA identified 139
facilities that manage newly identified organic TC wastes in land disposal units.
.
P-g-sr"
8*8
°
O
t/J
N>
>TJ
I
O
o
un
-------
3-8
3.2.1.2 Population Not Included in the TC Surrey
Because the TC Survey was sent only to those sites that land disposed TC organic
wastes, the TC Survey estimates the quantity of newly identified TC organic wastes being
land disposed that would require alternative commercially available treatment as a result
of the LDRs. Not all of the sources of newly identified TC organic waste generation
potentially requiring alternative commercial treatment, however, were captured by the
TC Survey. The two most obvious sources of potential additional TC organic waste
generation are corrective action activities and Superfund site clean-ups.
EPA did not capture all of the generation due to corrective action activities
* ecause the data bases used do not in themselves give complete information on the
corrective action activities at a particular facility. In the HWDMS data base, the
permitting and enforcement data are stored in two separate pans of the data base.
General information on corrective action events are stored with the permitting data. The
RCRIS data base contains all the information from the Part A application and only
minimal information from Pan B. Detailed technical information about the construction,
operation, maintenance, and closure of all the unite handling hazardous waste at a
particular facility is not available from RCRIS. In addition, although corrective action
requirements would be included in Part B of a facility's RCRA permit, most facilities, at
the time the permit is granted, would not be far into the corrective action process and
could not estimate the quantity of corrective action wastes that might be subject to the
LDRs. For example, it is not unusual for facilities to begin corrective action procedures
several years after Part B of the permit is approved.
Another complicating factor is that when the survey was conducted (1992), the •
Corrective Action program was relatively new. Facility investigations and corrective
measure studies are still being conducted today. Therefore, it is relatively difficult to
estimate the quantity of waste affected by corrective actions.
How a corrective action is to be performed would also affect whether a particular
facility was included in the TC Survey. Wastes to be treated in situ or left in place would
not trigger the LDRs; consequently, EPA did not request that these quantities be
reported in the TC Survey.
In spite of these limitations, EPA believes that the TC Survey captured most of
the TC organic waste generation due to corrective action and requiring alternative
treatment due to the LDRs. EPA believes these wastes would be included in the
quantity of TC organic wastes reported as land disposed by the commercial facilities.
The commercial facilities would be the ultimate receivers for most of these wastes,
because if the corrective action wastes are subject to the LDRs, generators of these
wastes would need to obtain a RCRA permit to treat these wastes on-site. These
permitting requirements could discourage generators from treating their wastes on-site
unless their corrective action would span several years.
o
71
o
g
C3
cn
-------
3-9
Using the TC Survey, EPA collected data on waste generation resulting from the
clean-up of Superfund sites only where wastes were removed from the site and sent off
site for treatment or disposal. For example, organic TC wastes from Superfund clean
ups that are sent to commercial landfills would be accounted for in EPA's analysis of TC
organic wastes land disposed at commercial landfills.
3.2.1-3 Formal of the TC Survey Questionnaire
The TC Survey questionnaire was divided into five sections: (I) General Facility
Information; (II) Land Disposal Units; (HI) Newly-identified Organic TC Waste Streams
Managed in Land Disposal Units; (IV) Treatment or Recovery Systems for Managing
Newly-identified Organic TC Wastes; and (V) Additional Information. A sample
questionnaire is provided in Appendix D. Each of these sections is described below.
Section I: General Facility Information. Section I requested information on the
facility, including the name, EPA ID number, mailing address, location, and the name
and phone number of the person to contact regarding responses to the survey. Section I
also requested a simple block diagram of units managing newly identified organic TC
wastes.
Section II: Land Disposal Units. Section [I requested information on the land
disposal units at the facility that are used to treat, store, or dispose newly identified
organic TC wastes. Specifically, this section requested information on the type of land
disposal unit (landfill, land treatment unit, surface impoundment, underground injection
•well or waste pile), management practices (storage, treatment,/ or disposal), the commer-
cial status (on-site, captive, or commercial), and the no-migration petition status of the
waste piles, [and treatment units, and underground injection wells. Information on the
no-migration petition status of land disposal units was requested since the LDRs are not
applicable to wastes managed in land disposal units with an approved no-migration
petition. (See Section 3.3.1 for a more detailed discussion on the use of this information
for analyzing the survey responses.)
Section II also requested information an the closure plans for surface impound-
ments along with the estimated quantities of wastes to he removed at closure. This
information was used to identify those facilities that planned to switch to tanks rather
than comply with the minimum technological requirements for surface impoundments by
the March 25, 1994, deadline (55 FR 11835. March 29, 1990).
Section IIT; Newlv-identificd Organic TC Wnste Streams Managed in Land
Disposal Units. This section requested information on organic TC waste streams that are
managed on site in land disposal units. Because the primary goal of the TC Survey is to
estimate the quantities of organic TC wastes that will require alternative treatment due
to the LDRs, the survey focused on identifying the quantities of organic TC wastes being
managed in land disposal units rather than the quantity of TC organic wastes generated.
*°R
O
00
K>
71
o
o
CD
—*
-------
3-10
Consequently, this section did not request information on wastes being shipped off site
for treatment, recycling, or disposal. If the waste w;is shipped off site and managed in a
land disposal unit, EPA identified this quantity from (he receiving facility rather than the
generator.
Section III is divided into three sub-sections. The first subsection (Pan A)
requested a description of the waste stream, including the origin of the waste stream (i.e.,
on-site or off-site); the EPA ID of the generator; the form of wasie stream received from
off-site locations (e.g., drums); the EPA hazardous waste code; the waste stream's
physical form and chemical composition, underlying hiiznrtlous constituents, and concen-
trations; the type of generation (i.e., routine, sporadic, or remedial); and the quantity
managed in on-site land disposal units.
Pan B requested information on the type of waste management (storage, disposal,
treatment, etc.), the .type of land disposal unit managing the waste stream, and the
quantity of the waste stream managed in the land disposal unit. Part C requested
information on planned waste minimization activities that could potentially reduce or
eliminate the TC waste stream, including the type
-------
3-11
3.2.1.4 Administering the TC Surrey
To assist facilities in responding to the questionnmrcs, six chemical engineers were
each given responsibility for a unique subset of the 139 fiidlities to facilitate the collec-
tion of information from the respondents. The cngirigcrs I'irM contacted the facilities to
inform them that their facility had been identified :ts m:in:iging newly identified TC
wastes in land disposal units and that they would be receiving a questionnaire. These
same individuals made follow-up telephone calls to verily receipt of the questionnaire, to
answer questions and to provide assistance in completing I lie questionnaire.
When the questionnaires were completed and returned by the facilities, the
engineers responsible for these facilities examined the questionnaires for. completeness
and technical accuracy, verified and validated the infonnniion, and made follow-up
tele; hone calls when necessary to clarify information.
Of the f 39 questionnaires mailed, three facilities did not return the questionnaire,
and 39 responded that they do not manage newly identified TC wastes in land disposal
units. Exhibit 3-3 presents an overview of the 97 facilities who confirmed that they
manage newly identified organic TC wastes in land Ji%[)i«;il units.
EXHIBIT 3-3
TC SURVEY RESPONDENTS WHO REPORTED MANAGING NEWLY
IDENTIFIED TC ORGANIC WASTES IN LAND DISPOSAL UNITS
o
I
O
o
Respondent
Commercial
Non-Commercial
TOTAL
•Surface
Disposal
17
66
83
Underground
Injection
5
13
IS
Both
0
4
4
3.2.2 Comments on the AN'PRM
In the October 24, 1991, ANPRM (56 FR 55K.O). 1IPA requested data on the
quantity of TC organic waste that would require alternative treatment. E. I. Dupont de
Nemours & Company, Inc. (Dupont) and Lawrence l.ivcrmore National Laboratories
(LLNL) provided waste quantity estimates for some nf ilicii facilities. Many of the
commenters (Chemical Manufacturers Association fC'MA), American Petroleum Institute
C3
UO
-------
3-12
|
(API), Dupont, Utility Solid Waste Activity Group (USWAG), and American Indepen-
dent Refiners Association (AIRA)), however, felt that the collection of TC data requires
more time than the 45-day comment period allowed by the ANPRM, and consequently,
were not able to submit complete data.
Commenters discussed the various sources of data and the methods that may be
used to estimate the quantities of wastes requiring alternative treatment due to the
LDRs. Dupont agreed with the Agency's acknowledgement that EPA's existing data
bases do not provide a clear or comprehensive view of the quantity of TC organic wastes
that will be generated and that may require alternative treatment due to the LDRs.
Three commenters, CMA, Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturers Association
(SOCMA), and LLNL encouraged EPA to conduct a comprehensive survey of the
industry before proceeding with the LDR rulemalcing. SOCMA recommended that EPA
develop and use information from facilities that have been complying with the new TCLP
characteristic.
Three commenters (API, CMA, and SOCMA) warned against using the Toxic
Release Inventory (TRI) as a basis for quantity estimates because the TRI data reflect
the quantity of the listed toxic chemical in a waste stream rather than the quantity of the
whole waste stream which would be subject to alternative treatment.
API believes that EPA should not use data on the quantity of TC wastes generat-
ed prior to the implementation of the TC Rule because this quantity does not reflect the
substantial changes in the regulatory climate in light of the National Emission Standards
for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) rules for primary sludge (F037 and F038) and
benzene. API also noted that in the past EPA has estimated quantities using best-case
examples which are not representative of the petroleum refining industry. Consequently,
API recommended that EPA incorporate data which considered all elements of a
required capacity analysis.
The ANPRM also requested comments and data on the development of treatment
standards and quantities of wastes requiring alternative commercial capacity due to the
LDRs for the newly identified TC pesticide wastes. EPA did not receive any estimates
for additional D012-D017 wastes due to the use of TCLP rather than the EP.
3.2J Capacity Data Obtained from the Comments to the Proposed Rule
In the background document to the Phase II proposed rule, EPA presented its
estimates of the quantities of TC nonwastewaters that would require alternative, commer-
cially-available treatment due to the LDRs for the time period 1991 to 1995. EPA did
not receive any comments to the Phase II proposed rule that disputed EPA's estimates of
the quantities of newly identified TC nonwastewatcrs that would require alternative
commercially-available treatment due to the LDRs. Consequently, EPA has not changed
i
o
oo
to
71
o
o
-------
3-13
its estimates of the quantities of TC nonwastewaicrs i)i;it will require alternative
treatment due to the LDRs.
In the Phase II proposed rule, EPA solicited comnuTiis on the quantities of newly
identified organic TC wastewaters and nonwasiewatcn ihfit were impacted by this rule
(i.e., wastewaters and olher liquid wastes not 1) m.inayccl in surface impoundments
regulated under the Clean Water Act, 2) managed in CWA-cquivalent systems prior to
ultimate land disposal, or 3) disposed of in Gass I urulcground injection wells regulated
under the Safe Drinking Water Act). EPA did not receive siny comments on this issue;
therefore, the Agency has concluded that sites managing organic TC wastewaters will not
be impacted by this rule..
33 METHODOLOGY, ASSUMPTIONS, AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS
In conducting the capacity analysis for Phase II wastes, EPA estimated the
amounts and characteristics of the wastes that will require iiliernative, commercially-
available treatment or recovery as a result of :he LDRs, These estimaies were revised
between the proposed and final rules as EPA evaluntcit ;idciiiional data. This section
presents only the estimates obtained for the final rule. The basic methodology did not
change between the two rulemaltings, and the analysis (if required capacity for TC wastes
consisted of four tasks:
'* Collect information on waste generation, chemical/physical characteristics,
type and concentration of constituents, waste (reliability, and current and
potential management practices (treatment, Murage, disposal, ond recycling)
of newly identified organic TC hazardous wiiMcs (DOI8-D043) that will be
restricted from land disposal. EPA collected this information using the '
1992 Survey of Organic Toxicity CharacicriMic Wastes Managed in Land
Disposal Units (TC Survey), and the comments EPA received to the Phase
II proposed rule.
• Quantify the demand for alternative jrciitiiicni or recycling (i.e., national
demand for on-site and commercial capacity) that will be created by the
shift of untreated D018-D043 TC WJMCS away from land disposal at the
expected promulgation date of the LDR (August, 1994), and for the two
year capacity variance "window" following ilic final rule (August 1996).
• Collect information on the generation, ni;in;i£cmcnt, and demand for
alternative treatment or recycling capacity for the newly identified D012-
DO 17 pesticide wastes.
• Collect information on the generation, m;in<'i£cment, and demand for
alternative treatment capacity for used oil exhibiting the TC.
S
o
. M
Q-g-tr»
' H
O
00
to
71
o
o
U
-------
3-14
Each of these tasks is discussed below. Section 3.3.1 describes how EPA analyzed and
interpreted the TC questionnaire responses. Section 3.3.2 presents EPA's estimates for
the quantity of newly identified surface disposed TC nonwastewaters that will require
alternative commercial treatment due to the LDRs. Section 3.3.3 presents a discussion of
the required capacity analysis for newly identified TC pesticide wastes that were not
previously hazardous by the old'EP leaching procedure. Section 3.3.4 concludes with a
discussion of EPA's estimates for the quantity nl uvd oil disposed in landfills.
3-3.1 Analysis of the TC Survey
Fur each questionnaire. EPA analyzed the waMe stream specific information and
categorized the quantities by year of generation, organic TC waste code {i.e., D018-
D043), the type of generation (routine, sporadic, tank clean out, treatment surface
impoundment closure, storage surface impoundment closure, or disposal surface im-
poundment closure), waste form (wastewater, noitwastewater, liquid nonwnstewater,
mixed radioactive, soil or debris), whether the tircam was mixed with any RCRA listed
wastes containing other organic constituents, and whether the waste stream would be
treated on-site or off-site when the LDRs become effective. EPA estimated the quanti-
ties of newly identified TC wastes that would be subject to the LDRs and that could also
be treated on-site using available or anticipated alternative treatment capacity. These
quantities are not part of EPA's estimate of waiict requiring alternative commercially
available treatment due to the LDRs.
Routinely and Sporadically Generated Wanes. EPA estimated the quantities of
newly identified organic TC wastes requiring alternative treatment as a result of the
LDRs. For wastes identified in the questionnaire as routinely or sporadically generated,
the quantities reported for 1991 were used as the baseline quantities for estimating the
annual waste generation for 1992 through 1995. EPA assumed that any waste reported
as routinely or sporadically generated an an annual basis (i.e., irregularly generated over
the course of a year) would continue to be generated at the same. rate through 1995,
unless the questionnaire respondent specifically indicated otherwise. If a routinely
generated waste was not generated for an entire year, the amount of waste estimated for
that year was the annual amount prorated for the portion of the year that the waste was
being generated. This steady state assumption ;ibo was used to project the annual
quantity of wastes, from 1992 to 199S, associated with management of TC wastes in land-
based units and potentially requiring alternative commercial treatment due to the LDRs.
One-Time Generated Wastes. Waste quantities reported as one-time generations
(e.g., quantities resulting from a remediation activity) were only included in the estimates
of wastes requiring alternate treatment for the year «>r years in which these wastes were
generated or planned to be generated. Waste quantities generated from remedial actions
or corrective action activities were treated as one-time generations and reported only for
their year of generation. EPA believes that theic unites wo>itd not be generated at a
constant rate over the time frame of the analviiv
8 " sr
c &s
a S *
S«a
S« 2
•o
00
to
o
o
-------
3-15
No-Migration Petitions. Restricted wastes may continue to be land disposed
without treatment to the LDR treatment standards if a facility c:in demonstrate that
hazardous constituents will not migrate from the disposal unit for ns long as the waste
lemains hazardous. The demonstration must include the components specified in 40
CFR 268.6(a) and meet the sampling, testing and analysis criteria required in 40 CFR
268.6(b). An approved no-migration petition allows wastes to be land disposed at a
specific site. If wastes were managed in land disposal units hfivjng nn approved no-
inigration petition for the TC constituents in the wastes, then these wastes would not be
subject to the LDRs pursuant to RCRA section 3004(h)(4). If i!ie no-migration petition
for a land disposal unit was not yet approved at the time of the questionnaire, and no
i.pproximate date for approval was given, then EPA assumed iliat the land disposal unit
would not have an approved no-migration petition for the entire period from 1991
through 1995, and that the quantities of wastes handled in such units would be subject to
the LDRs.
Waste Forth \flxtures. Some survey respondents indicated more than one waste
form (i.e., wastewater, nonwastewater, soil, dtbr:s) for an individual waste stream. Waste
form mixtures were apportioned based on the specific waste forms in the mixture.
Mixtures of soil and debris or nonwastewater and debris were ;i.ssumed to be 75 weight
percent soil or nonwastewater, and 25 weight percent debris.1'' The quantities of all
cither waste form mixtures were apportioned equally between the individual waste forms.
(Question 27 of Section III indicated the waste forms of each W.MMC stream managed by
the facility.)
Organic TC Wastes Mixed with Organic F. K. U. or_P_ Wastes. Many individual
waste streams were reported as bearing more than one RCRA waste code. EPA
examined each mixture to determine whether the mixture would require alternative
treatment. LDR treatment standards have existed for all F, K, U, and P wastes since
1990. Treatment standards for these wastes are incineration, wet air oxidation, carbon
adsorption, or air/steam stripping. Consequently, treatment of these wastes by these
methods would likely result in the waste no longer exhibiting T.I'A »nn representatives of companies
i -KU manage hazardous debris. See Background Dxumia f>* r^^-Li Jmkiu l<* Xnfy Land H'asies ami Hazardous
Iktris 10 Support 40 CFR 263 Land Disposal Ktsirictions (Fir-! R-'ei. Jcnc W2, Volume 1, p. 6-6.
* With ihe ocepiion of say and debris contaminated w:!; I>..:J 1>,;rJ V.-MC-, .mJ mulu-source leactuie, which
r:«iw!(J variances in the Third Third Rgk until Nfay 1991
fff
5" s" » i
1 * S* i
?" aM "
O n ST
a
S
o
71
o
o
.J
-------
3-16
longer characteristic, and EPA assumed that these wastes would not require additional
treatment as a result of the LDRs for TC wastes.
Mixtures of Organic TC Wastes. If all the RCRA waste codes of the waste
stream were newly-identified TC codes (i.e., D018-D043), the waste quantity was
apponioned equally among the organic TC codes.
Mixtures of Metal and Organic TC Wastes. If the waste stream carried organic
and metal TC waste codes, the appropriate LOR treatment to meet the metal standards
(e.g., stabilization) would not necessarily meet the TC LDR standards. Because the total
mixture would likely require treatment for the organics, the total waste quantity was
apportioned among the organic TC codes.
Waste Minimization. Waste minimization was declared a national policy by
RCRA section 2003(b). In this analysis the reported quantities of generated waste were
noi reduced to account for waste minimization that was begun on or before 1991, as
EPA assumed the quantities reported in 1991 reflected the effects of this waste
minimization activity. EPA did not adjust these quantities unless additional waste
minimization efforts were reported to be planned for the future. For waste minimization
reported to begin after 1991, EPA reduced the waste quantities by the amount of the
reductions the facilities expected as a result of waste minimization. EPA used the effects
of anticipated waste minimization activities to adjust estimates of wastes requiring
treatment between 1992 and 1995.
Wastes Managed in Landfills. Land Treatment Units, or Waste Piles. EPA
assumed that the entire quantity of newly identified TC wastes reported as being
managed in landfills, land treatment units, or waste piles would require alternative
treatment as a result of the LDRs, unless the facility reported having an approved no-
migratiqn petition for management of the newly identified TC wastes.
Wastes Generated in Surface Impoundments. Sites that were managing newly
identified TC wastes in surface impoundments wece required to upgrade these impound-
ments to meet the Minimum Technological-Requirements (MTRs) if the sites wished to
continue to manage hazardous wastes in these impoundments. If sites chose not to
upgrade their impoundments, the sites were required to close the impoundments or
convert them into Subtitle D impoundments to manage non-hazardous wastes within four
years from the date of promulgation of the TC Rule (March 25, 1994). EPA assumed
that any waste stream reported as being managed in a treatment impoundment that
complied with the MTRs would continue to be managed in the treatment impoundment
after March, 1994.
Surface impoundment closures would likely generate nonwastewater sludges, soil,
and debris. EPA assumed that any sludge, debris, or soil, leaving" or removed from a
surface impoundment that managed newly identified TC wastes would exhibit the TC and
^?5
•- -rs?
0.0.5-1
• O ™ i
? a.1
O
oo
to
71
o
O
-C
-------
3-17
would require alternative treatment due to the LDRs. The only exception to this rule
occurred when the facility reported that the surface impoundment would be closed with
the wastes in place. Because no wastes were retrieved from the unit, the wastes would
not be subject to the LDRs.
Wastes Managed in Tanks. Most of those facilities that reported managing newly
identified TC waste streams in surface impoundments that did not meet the MTRs, also
reported that these waste streams would be managed in tanks on or before the effective
date of the MTRs (March 25, 1994). Wastes managed in tanks would not be subject to
the LDR treatment standards. However, nonwastewater sluJge (lank clean out wastes)
would be generated and would likely require alternative treatment. EPA assumed these
wastes would exhibit the same organic TC as the wastes managed in tanks, and that these
tank clean-out wastes would require alternative treatment due to the LDRs.
3-3.2 Quantity of Surface Disposed Organic TC Wastes Requiring Alternative
Treatment Due to the LDRs
Exhibit 3-4 shows EPA's estimates for the quantities of newly identified TC wastes
that will require alternative commercially available treatment as a result of the LDRs.
Exhibit 3-4 projects the estimated demand for alternative treatment through 1995.
These estimates of future demand for alternative treatment were based on survey
respondents' answers about anticipated waste generation activities, planned waste
minimization efforts, planned construction of alternative, non land-based treatment
systems, and actions taken because of other regulatory requirements (i.e., NESHAPs and
the minimum technology requirements (MTRs)).
N'omvastewater Sludges/Solids. The survey results indicate a more or less steady
generation, through 1995, of nonwastewater sludges that wftuld require alternative,
commercially available treatment as a result of the LDRs. Many facilities reported plans
to replace their surface impoundments with tanks. Although these tanks were expected
to be ready to meet the March, 1994, deadline, approximately half of the facilities that
would be replacing their surface impoundments with tanks could not estimate the amount
of nonwastewater sludges they would be removing from their tanks as a result of tank
clean-outs. If a facility did not estimate their tank clean-out quantities, EPA assumed
they generated none. Consequently, the results most likely underestimate the actual
quantity of waste generation from tank clean outs.
The preliminary analysis of the survey responses revealed a number of trends in
the quantities of wastes requiring alternative treatment. Virtually nil of the survey
respondents indicated they would be shipping their newly identified TC waste quantities
off-site for treatment once the LDRs become effective. Only one facility reported having
alternative treatment capacity already in place to treat all of their newly identified TC
wastes currently managed in land disposal units. EPA believes that there are two reasons
for this limited development of on-site capability. First, the treatment standards for the
o
c/a
to
o
o
-------
3-13
EXHIBIT 3-4
SURFACE DISPOSED ORGANIC TC NONWASTEWATERS REQUIRING
ALTERNATIVE COMMERCIALLY-AVAILABLE TREATMENT
' *":
Physical Form
Nonwastewaters-
Sludges/Solids
Nonwastewaters-
Liquid
Annual Totals
Surface Disposed Nonwastewatcrs (Tons)
1991
263,518
11,450
274,968
1992
305,213
11.447
316.660
1993
252,347
11.447
263,794
1994
220.262
. H.170
231.432
1995
256,200
1 1,447
267,647
ia»
3 rt 2.
*°R
o
newly identified TC wastes have not been promulgated. In follow up conversations, a
number of facility contacts said they had several potential plans for constructing alterna-
tive treatment systems, and are waiting for the treatment standards to be published
before they decide how to proceed. A second reason, is that the TC Survey was directed
to facilities that land disposed newly identified TC wastes. EPA did not send the survey
to those facilities that generated and managed newly identified TC wastes in non land-
based units, or those facilities that generated newly identified TC waste, yet shipped it
off-site for treatment or disposal as a matter of routine practice." No information was
collected on whether these facilities have plans for constructing on-site treatment systems
to manage their newly identified TC waste. Because some generators may construct on-
site treatment rather than transfer the waste off-site, the future demand for commercial
treatment may shift to on-site treatment.
Exhibit 3-5 presents the estimates of newly identified surface-disposed TC
nonwastewater sludges/solids that will require alternative commercially available treat-
ment in 1994, broken down by waste code. For each type of waste tracked in the survey,
Exhibit 3-5 reports the quantities exhibiting the TC for DO 18 and D019-D043. The
apportionment assumptions discussed in Section 3.3.1 for wastes exhibiting the TC for
several waste codes were used to generate these results. Of the 220,262 tons of newly
identified TC organic nonwastewater sludges/solids anticipated to require alternative
treatment in 1994 as a result cf the LDRs, the TC Survey data indicated that 122,525
:| For ihe group of generators of TC organic uauea irui routinely shipju'd ihcir wtnlci of! site for treatment or
disposal. EPA assumed that the required capacity for these fencrjiora WM eipiured in the TC Survey responses of
commercial facilities that land disposed TC wastes.
O
o
u
-------
3-19
tons (56 percent) will consist of D018, and 97.737 Ions (44 percent) will consist of D019-
D043.
/
_'»,
f
>*v
EXHIBIT 3-5
1994 ESTIMATED SURFACE DISPOSED
ORGANIC TC NONWASTEWATER SLUDGES REQUIRING
ALTERNATIVE COMMERCIALLY-AVAILABLE TREATMENT
c e S
Is"
H
O
Waste
Code
D018
D019
D020 .
D021
D022
D023
D024
D025
D026
D027
D028
D029
D030
Quantity
(Tons)
120,000
8,700
6,300
8,500
8,400
3,900
520
310
1,500
1,200
11,000
3,800
510
TOTAL*
Waste
Code
D031
D032
D033
D034
D035
D036
D037
D038
D039
D040
D041
D042
D043
Quantity
(Tons)
200
3,300
450
410
4,200
260
600
3,600
6,900
6,600
110
120
16,000
220,000
'Note: Tout auy not 41103 due lo rounding.
n
O
O
a
Liquid Npnwastewaters. Exhibit 3-4 also shows the projected demand for alterna-
tive commercial treatment for surface-disposed liquid nonwastewaters. (Liquid nonwaste-
-------
3-20
waters are liquid wastes not meeting the definition of a wnstewater. ) EPA anticipates
a steady generation of liquid nonwastewaters requiring alternative commercially available
treatment through 1995. These 11,000 tons of liquid ntmwnstewaters tend to contain a
high organic content, and were reported in the TC Survey us being managed in landfills.
For the purposes of the capacity analysis, these wastes were assigned to liquid combus-
tion.
333 Newly Identified TC Pesticide Wastes That Were Not Previously Hazardous by the
Old Extraction Procedure
In response to the October 24, 1991 ANPRM. EPA did not receive any estimates
for additional D012-D017 waste quantities or newly identified D012-D017 wastes due to
the use of TCLP rather than the EP. Because of the lack of comments to this issue,
EPA continues to believe that the quantities of the newly-identified D012-D017 pesticide
wastes due to the use of the TCLP rather than the EP arc small, if any, and expects little
or no additional demand for commercial treatment capacity us a result of the LDRs.
3.3.4 Quantities of Used Oil Disposed in Landfills
Several EPA programs regulate used oil generators, transporters, collectors and
recyclers. In addition, used oil that exhibits the TC may be subject to the LDR, if it is
not recycled.23 In a previous analysis, EPA estimated thnt the majority of used oil
(approximately 800 million gallons per year) is being recycled by burning for energy
recovery and refining, and that a small portion of the total quantity of used oil generated
each year (approximately 80 million gallons) is disposed.
EPA extracted data from the 199! Biennial Reporting System and reviewed
preliminary data from the State of New Jersey in order 10 estimate the quantities of used
oil that are managed in landfills. Exhibit 3-6 shows the total quantities of waste types
that may contain used oil and indicate the quantities managed on-site and off-site and the
quantities of these wastes reportedly landfilled on-site and off-site. The quantity of
landfilled wastes that may contain used oil is a small percentage of the total quantity of
used oil generated and managed by other means than disposal (i.e., treatment or
•Ml
22 A wastewater a deBacd in 40 CFR 263.2 as a liquid wane having leu than I1* by weight total organic carbon
(TOC) and leu than 1% by weight total suspended solids (TSS). with The following exceptions: (1) FOOI, FOOI F003,
F004, and FOOS wasiewaten are solvent-water menu res that eiimain leu than If by weight TOC or less than 1% by
might total FOOI, FOB, FOOS, F004, and FOOS solvent consmucnts listed in S26H.41, Table CCWE; (2) KOI 1. KOI3, and
KOI4 wastewaten contain leu Ihao S% by Might TOC and tea than 1% by weight TSS, at generated; and (3) K103 and
KI04 wasiewaten contain less than 4% by Might TOC and leu ihun l"3> by weight TSS.
a Used oil thai is recycled and exhibits the TC is not subject 10 inc I.UKs. m accordance with §261.6{aX4).
:* EPA, Haiardota Watte Management Syvim; Central lArM'icuruai anil I Ming of Hazardous tt'oiK; Hud Oil
(Final Rule),W CFR Part 361, May 1992.
3 r»
O
&
to
71
o
O
CD
-------
/v<
3-21
recycling). Overall, the BRS data show that approximately one percent of all reported
waste oil is landfiiJed. For example in the "Oil Changes" category of the 1991 BRS,
approximately 1,400 tons was reported as landfilled. Furthermore, most of the wastes
from oil changes are reported as state codes (primarily from California and New Jersey)
and may not be subject to this rule.
EXHIBIT 3-6
USED OIL'MANAGEMENT
srPi
•••. H
3 ™
Ifff
ft
.
Source/Form Code
Possibly Containing
Used Oil
Source Code A54
Oil Changes
Font Code B205
Oil-Water Emulsion
Mixture
Form Code B205
Waste Oil
Form Code B603
Oily Sludge
Total Used Oil*
Total All Wastes*
Quantity
Managed On
Site (Tons)
5.500
10,000.000
SS.OOO
470.000
1.600,000
-
Quantity
Managed Off
Site (Tons)
80,000
230.000
290,000
: 10,000
710,000
--
Quantity
Landfilicd
On Site (Tons)
30
0
30
2,900
2,900
530.000
Quantity
Landfilicd •
Off Site (Tons)
1.400
3.600
UOO
.17,000
43.000
2,000,000
• Totab nay 001 MUD due lo rouQdin{.
Source: 1991 Biennial Reporting S}i(cm
The State of New Jersey treats used oil as state hazardous waste and maintains
waste management data from State manifests. Preliminary data from New Jersey on
used oil management are shown in Exhibit 3-7 and indicate that approximately one
percent of all used oil generated in the state is landfilled. This one percent includes both
used oil hazardous for TC organics and nonhazardous used oil (i.e., used oil that is
considered hazardous under New Jersey regulations, but not under federal regulations).
EPA's analysis of used oil has determined that the quantities of used oil that are
land disposed and are also hazardous for TC organics are small and that sufficient reuse-
as fuel, energy recovery, and or incineration capacity exists. Thus, EPA has determined
that a capacity variance is not warranted for these wastes.
o
GO
O
O
-------
3-22
EXHIBIT 3.7
NEW JERSEY'S USED OIL MANAGEMENT
Year
19SS
1989
1990
1991
1992
Quaniity of Used Oil Managed in
Landfills (Tons)
2,200
660
2,000
3.700
650
Total Quaniity of Used Oil
Generated (Tons)
120.000
160,000
210,000
170.000
130,000
Source SuieofSt* Jtre«y Hazardous Waste Coatus™
3.4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR TOX1CITY CHARACTERISTIC WASTES
To determine the need for national capacity variances, EPA estimated the
quantities of TC waste requiring alternative commercially available treatment as a result
i, ~) of the LDRs and the available capacity at commercial treatment facilities to treat these
~" restricted wastes. As discussed in this chapter. EPA expects little if any additional
demand for treatment capacity for newly identified pesticide wastes (D012-D017).
Exhibit 3-8 summarizes the quantities of organic TC minwastewaters that will require
alternative, commercially available treatment capacity ;>s a result of today's rule and
compares then to the commercial treatment capacity that is projected to be available in
August 1994 for each alternative treatment technology required for newly identified TC
wastes, as discussed in Chapter 2. A comparison of the required and available capacity
indicates that sufficient capacity exists to treat surface disposed nonwastewater sludges/-
solids exhibiting the TC for D018-D043. EPA also believes that sufficient commercial
treatment capacity is currently available tb treat surface disposed organic TC
nonwastewater liquids. For the purposes of this analysis, EPA has assigned the entire
quantity of organic TC liquid nonwastewaters to liquid combustion.
As previously mentioned in this chapter, the TC Survey was the main source of
data on the quantities of newly identified TC wastes that will require alternative
commercially available treatment due to the LDRs. Although the TC Survey question-
naire asked respondents to provide data on the piociicc of other hazardous constituents
in their wastes, very few respondents provided this d;ii;i. Consequently, EPA was not
able to determine (1) whether the newly identified TC wastes covered by today's rule
also contained other hazardous constituents th.it would he subject to the Universal Treat-
ment Standards; (2) the other hazardous constituents in the wastes; and (3) how the
5-
Is"
o
oo
o
o
'"
-------
3-23
EXHIBIT 3-8
COMPARISON OF REQUIRED AND
COMMERCIALLY AVAII.AIU.K CAPACITY FOR
SURFACE-DISPOSED NEWLY IDENTIFIED ORGANIC TC NONWASTEWATERS
Waste Type
D018-D043
Sludges/Solids
D018-D043
Liquid Nonwaste-
waters
D018-D043 Wastes
(Treatment
Residuals)
Treatment
Technology
Sludges/Solids
Combustion
Liquids
Combustion
Stabilization
Available Capacity
(Tons/year)
334,000
541,000
1.127,000
Required Capacity
(Tons/year)
253,000
1 1,000
NAa
' Stabilization ma* be required to m»t underNiD| hutrdcu* ncul crmuilurmi in organic TC *^»ica 1j
O
o
presence of these constituents would affect the waste's trcutubility or the choice of
technologies that could be used to treat these wastes. Therefore, EPA assumed that no
additional treatment of the TC wastes or their residuals wilt be required due to the
presence of organic underlying hazardous constituents. EPA believes that any metal
underlying hazardous constituents in these Basics can bu treated to universal treatment
standards using stabilization. As shown in Exhibit 3-8, there is sufficient stabilization
capacity to treat these wastes, if necessary.
J
-------
CHAPTER 4
CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR NEWLY LISTED WASTES
This chapter presents EPA's analysis of required alternative commercial treatment
capacity for several newly listed wastes that are currently being land disposed. This
chapter specifically addresses coke by-product wastes (KS4I-K145, K147-K148) and
chlorinated toluene wastes (K149-K151). The purpose of the required capacity analysis is
to estimate the quantity of these wastes requiring alternative commercial treatment
capacity as a result of the LDRs.
4.1 DATA SOURCES AND METHODOLOGY
EPA used several data sources for conducting the required capacity analysis for
these newly listed organic wastes. The Agency collected generation and management
information on coke by-product wastes (K141-K145, K147-K14S) during 19S5 and 1987
under the authority of section 3007 of RCRA. Additional capacity information on coke-
by product wastes was obtained from the Regulatory Impact Analysis25 and the
Economic Impact Analysis (ELY)26 for the listing of these wastes, along with comments
submitted in response to the proposed rule for the identification and listing of coke, by-
product wastes (56 FR 35758, July 26, 1991). Generation and management information
on chlorinated toluene wastes was collected by EPA during 1987 under the authority of
section 3007 of RCRA. Several companies involved in the data collection effort for both
chlorinated toluene and coke by-product wastes requested that their information be
classified as Confidential Business Information.
EPA's assessment of required alternative commercial capacity was based on an
analysis of the most current generation and management of these wastes. To determine
how each individual waste stream will be affected by the final rule, EPA first considered
whether a waste stream is currently land-disposed. If a waste is not currently land-
disposed or is land-disposed in a unit that has received a no-migration petition, or is
managed in a RCRA-exempt unit, it would not be subject to the LDRs. For the
required capacity analysis, EPA assumed that all land-disposed wastes will require
commercial alternative treatment.
These land-disposed waste quantities were assigned the technology on which the
Agency based the final LDR treatment standards. EPA compared the required capacity
for a particular treatment process to the available commercial capacity to determine
whether a capacity variance would be warranted.
-Midwat Reward! Imtiluie, Background Doewrunt Supponinf tht Propoitd Lilting of Wasus From the Production,
Rtcovtry, end Refining of Cvk* By-ProJuett Produced From Cooi rtfort prepared tor EPA, 1991.
^DPRA Incorporated, Con and Economic tmfaa XiuAiit Of Luring Additional Wailti From iht Coke By-Pmduea
(Coking and Tar Riffling) Indian, nport prepared for EPA. !V».
o
o
o
-------
4-2
4.2 REQUIRED CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR COKE BY-PRODUCT WASTES
K141-K145 wastes are generated by the coking industry. Two types of plants exist
within this industry: captive and merchant plants. Captive coke plants are operated by •
major iron and steel companies and produce blast furnace coke that is generally used on
site or within the company at integrated iron and steel plants to produce steel. Captive
plants are owned by the iron and steelmaking firms. Merchant plants are smaller,
independent plants that sell coke on a commercial basis. Foundries (hat use coke to
melt iron prior to casting are the major consumers of coke produced by merchant plants.
Between 1985 and 1989, the number of coking plants in operation declined from forty to
thirty-four.27 Updated information provided by an industry trade organization indicates
that there are currently thirty-two active plants.2* Twenty-two of the thirty-two plants
are classified as captive and ten are considered merchant. A list of active plants is
provided in the Background Document for the final listing of these wastes.
K147 and K148 wastes are generated by tar refining plants. Tar refining plants
purchase coal tar from coking plants for use in production and use distillation processes
that separate the various products (e.g., coal tar pitch, creosote oil, naphthalene, solvent
naphtha, and refined tar). There are fourteen active tar refining facilities. Eleven of the
fourteen tar refining facilities generate K147 and KJ48 wastes.2'
Coke by-product and tar refining wastes contain hazardous constituents such as
benzene and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. The definition of coke by-product
wastes are:
•Q _ M,
aaj
- o <
O
oo
N>
71
o
o
K141 Process residues from the recover)' of coal tar, including but not limited to
tar collecting sump residues from the production of coke from coal or the
recovery of coke by-products produced from coal. This listing does not
include K087, decanter tank tar Sludge from coking operations.
K142 Tar storage tank residues from the production of coke from coal or the
recovery of coke by-products produced from coal.
K143 Process residues from the recovery of light oil, including but not limited to
those generated in stills, decanters, and wash oil recovery units from the
recovery of coke by-products produced from coal.
"op. tit., DPRA Incorporated. 19)0.
EPA, final Rutt: Idtroipftoion and LJsanf of /tii-rfotu U'aile; CERCLA Hazardous Subiianct
Dcsipwion; Reponotlt Quantity Adjusonz/u: Coke Bi-Pmiuc-j U'astti. July 31, i992.
"U
LU
-------
o
K144
K145
K147
KI48
4-3
Wastcwater treatment sludges from light oil refining, including but not
limited to intercepting or contamination sump sludges from the recovery of
coke by-products produced from coal.
Residues from naphthalene collection and recovery operations from the •
recovery of coke by-products produced from coal.
Tar storage tank residues from coal tar refining.
Residues from coal tar distillation, including but not limited to still bottoms.
The coke by-products listing was proposed on July 26, 1991 (56 FR 35758) and
finalized on July 31, 1992. For all coke by-product anil tar refining nonwastewaters, EPA
is promulgating concentration standards (consistent with UTS) based on incineration
performance data. For coke by-product wastewaters, EPA is promulgating concentration
standards based on the performance of industrial wasicwater systems. The primary
source of data on waste management practices was the EIA for the listing of these
wastes.30 For the EIA, waste management practices were determined on a plant-
specific basis for each waste stream. If a facility did not report a management practice
for a specific waste, the Agency used best engineering judgement to determine the
management practice. EPA believes that the quantities of coke by-product wastes land-
disposed may be lower than those documented in the EIA for two reasons. First, the
number of coking plants decreased between 1985 and 19S9. Second, commenters noted
an increase in recycling of coke by-product wastes in response to the proposed rule for
the listing of these wastes.'
According to information submitted by coking plants in the 1985 RCRA 3007
questionnaires for the proposed listing, the majority of coking plants used biological
treatment for wastewaters in RCRA-exempt tanks before discharging them to a POTW
or through a NPDES permitted outfall. Tank bottoms may be removed from these units
periodically and potentially be subject to the LDRs. EPA solicited comments or
information on tank bottoms that may require alternative treatment, but received no
responses. In 1985, six coking plants managed wastewaters in surface impoundments.31
Presently, all facilities in the coking industry have closed their surface impoundments and
lagoons. Those facilities currently manage wastewaters generated from coking
operations in wastewater treatment plants that arc regulated under the Qean Water Act
and other EPA regulatory programs.
"ibid.
"ibid
"op. til., DPRA Incorporated, 199O.
i 1 1
»
» w
o
DO
ts>
T1
o
o
-------
4-4
Management practices and estimates for each newly-listed K141-K145
nonwastcwater, obtained from 1987 data, are discussed below.33
• Only one facility land disposed process residues from coal tar recovery
(K141) in an on-site landfill. The remaining facilities recycled the wastes
back to coke ovens or decanters. The total amount of K141
nonwastewaters managed in the on-site landfill was 49 tons.
• Seven facilities reported that they land disposed tar storage lank residues
from coking operations (K142) in on-site or off-site land-based units. The
total amount of K142 nonwastewaters kind disposed was 2,750 tons. The
remaining facilities recycled watte back to the coke oven.
• The majority of residues from light oil plant processing units (K143) were
recycled to coke ovens, decanters or to tar sumps. Several facilities used
the wastes as fuel in boilers Several facilities shipped waste off-site for
reclamation. One facility disposed 10 tons of K143 nonwastewaters in an
off-site landfill.
• The majority of wastewater treatment sludges from light oil refining (K144)
were recycled to coke ovens, sumps or decanters. Four facilities managed
these wastes in landfills. The total amount of K144 nonwastewaters land-
disposed during 1987 was 304 tons.
• Facilities that generated residues from (he production of naphthalene
,. collection and recovery (K145) recycled the residues back to decanters,
ovens, or to tar tanks. No K145 nonwastewaters were land-disposed in
1987.
According to information submitted by tar-refining plants in response to 1985
RCRA 3007 questionnaires for the listing of these wastes, all tar-refining plants managed
their waste waters in RCRA-exempt tanks or in surface impoundments already regulated
under Subtitle C because they managed K035 wastes (i.e., wastewater treatment sludges
generated from creosote production). Presently, all facilities in the tar refining industry
have closed their surface impoundments and currenlly manage wastewaters generated
from tar refining operations in wastewater treatment plants. These wastewater
treatment plants are regulated under the Clean Water Act and other EPA regulatory
programs.
Q, O. r> <*
• o " >-
"ibid.
"Source: EPA, ratal Rule: Umttficeaon and Loom of H^aniaur Ua\u: C.tRCLA liazvioiu Substance
Designation; Rtponatlc Quantity Adjustment: Cola By-rnxlu?x lliii/rt, Jul> 31. 1992.
O
o
o
un
-------
4-5
Management practices and estimates for K147 ;md K148 nonwastewaters,
obtained from 1987 data, are discussed below.'1
• Tar storage tank residues (K147) were recycled hack to coke ovens,
recycled back to the production using circulation pumps, or landfilled. The
total amount of K147 nonwastewaters land-disposed was 1,403 tons.
• Still bottoms and residues from coal tar distillation (K148) were recycled
back to coke ovens and landfilled. The tola! amount of K148
nonwastewaters land-disposed was less than 1(K) tons.
In total, EPA estimates that about 4.600 tons of coke by-product nonwastewaters
(K14M45, KI47-148) will require alternative commercial treatment as a result of today's
final rule.
43 REQUIRED CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR CHLORINATED TOLUENE WASTES
(K149-K1S1)
KI49-K15I wastes are generated from the manufacturing of chlorinated toluenes.
The chlorinated toluene industry is composed of four facilities thai manufacture ten
chemical products. Chlorinated toluenes are used as intermediates and raw materials for
manufacturing chemical products such as pesticides, herbicides, Pharmaceuticals, and
solvents. The manufacture of chlorinated toluenes includes four .chemical processes:
(1) Thermal chain (alpha) chlorination. (2) ultraviolet light-catalyzed chain chlorination,
(3) Lewis acid-catalyzed ring chlorination, and (4) catalyiic steam hydrolysis. These
wastes typically contain various hazardous halogenaicd orgimic compounds. The
definitions of newly listed chlorinated toluene wastes (K149-K1S1) are:
K149 Distillation bottoms from the production of alpha- (or methyl) chlorinated
toluenes, ring-chlorinated toluenes, bcnzoyl chlorides, and compounds with
mixtures of these functional'groups. (This waste does not include still
bottoms -from the distillation tJf benzyl chloride.)
K150 Organic residuals, excluding spent carbon adsorbent, from the spent
chlorine gas and hydrochloric acid recovery processes associated with the
production of alpha- (or methyl-) chlorinated toluenes, ring-chlorinated
toluenes, benzoyl chlorides, and compounds with mixtures of these
functional groups.
K1S1 Wastewater treatment sludges, excluding neutralization and biological
sludges, generated during the treatment (if wastewaters from the production
i
«= e 2
3 S w
"op. at.. DPRA Incorporated. 1990.
o
00
K)
71
o
o
Oj
en
J
-------
4-6
of alpha- (or methyl-) chlorinated toluenes, ring-chlorinated toluenes,
benzoyl chlorides, and compounds with mixtures of these functional groups.
The chlorinated toluene wastes listing was proposed on October 11, 1991 (56 FR
51593) and finalized on September 30, 1992 (57 FR 44999). For chlorinated toluene
nonwastewaters, EPA is promulgating concentration standards based on incineration
performance data. For chlorinated toluene waste-waters, EPA is promulgating
concentration standards based on the performance of industrial wastewater systems.
EPA collected generation and management information on wastes generated from
the production of chlorinated toluenes (KI49-K151) under the authority of section 3007
in RCRA and during site visits in 1983. Additional information was obtained from the
Background Documents for the listing of these wastes.36 EPA identified no K149
nonwastewaters, no K150 nonwastewaters, and less than 100 tons of K151
nonwastewaters that are currently being land disposed. EPA identified no quantities, of
chlorinated toluene wastewaters that would require alternative commercial treatment as a
result of the LDRs.
o
4,4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR OTHER NEWLY LISTED WASTES
EPA estimates that 4,600 tons of coke-by-product nonwastewaters and less than
100 tons of chlorinated toluene nonwastewaters require off-site commercial capacity as a
result of this rule. EPA has determined that these waste can be treated to meet LDR
standards by using combustion technologies. EPA also as determined that there is
adequate sludge/solid combustion capacity to accommodate these wastes. Therefore, the
Agency is not granting a capacity variance for these other newly listed wastes.
o
o
**Thc Background Documcnls consist of an Enjjneenflj Analyst and ;i Health Assessment Document. The
Engineering Analysts ta been classified as Conlidcmial Buuress Information (CGI) and a not available [o ine public.
The Healti) Assessment Document is not CBI anJ is avaits&ie in ihc UCHA Docket.
Oi
Oj
—I
-------
CHAPTER S
CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR SURFACE DISPOSED MIXED RADIOACTIVE WASTE
This chapter presents EPA's estimates of the quantities of mixed RCRA/
radioactive wastes (mixed wastes) contaminated with newly listed and identified wastes
(D012-D017; D018-D043; K141-K145; and KZ47-KI51) that will require alternative
commercial treatment as a result of the proposed Phase II LDRs. The chapter also
discusses the available alternative treatment capacity for mixed wastes. The chapter is
organized into four sections: Section 5.1 provides background on EPA's findings for
previous analyses of required capacity concerning mixed wastes; Section 5.2 examines the
data sources used to conduct the analysis of required capacity for Phase II mixed waste;
Section 5.3 presents the results of EPA's review of the available data sources on DOE
and non-DOE mixed waste generation; Section 5.4 discusses the alternative treatment
capacity that will be available to treat mixed wastes; and Section 5.5 discusses the
national capacity variance for mixed wastes.
5.1 BACKGROUND
EPA has defined a mixed waste as any matrix containing a RCRA hazardous
' waste and a radioactive waste subject to the Atomic Energy Act (53 FR 37045, 37046,
September 23, 1988). Regardless of the t>pe of radioactive constituents that mixed
wastes contain or the radiological classification of the wastes (i.e., high-level, low-level, or
transuranic), thess wastes are currently subject to RCRA hazardous waste regulations. In
general, the treatment standards for mixed waste are the same treatment standards in
effect for non-radioactive RCRA hazardous waste.
Mixed wastes that contain spent solvents, dioxins, or California list wastes, First
Third, Second Third, or Third Third scheduled wastes, or Phase I scheduled wastes, are
subject to the land disposal restrictions already promulgated for those hazardous wastes.
In the Third Third rulemakmg, EPA granted a two-year national capacity variance for
mixed waste contaminated with First Third, Second Third, and Third Third waste because
of a lack of available alternative treatment capacity. This variance expired on May 8,
1992. In addition, EPA granted a generic, one-year extension of the LDR effective date
applicable to all facilities managing hazardous debris (with several exceptions), including
mixed waste classified as debris. This extension was renewed for one additional year and
expired on May 8, 1994.
In the Phase I nilemaking (57 FR 37194. August 18, 1992), EPA granted a two-
year national capacity variance for mixed waste contaminated with Phase I waste because
of insufficient alternative treatment capacity. The wnsies regulated under the Phase I
LDRs include F037, F038, K107, K108, K109. KI10. Kill, KI12, K117, K118, K123,
KI24, K125, K126, K131, K132, K136, U328. U353, and U359. This variance expired on
June 30, 1994.
O
o
o
CD
-------
5-2
The Department of Energy (DOE) submitted a case-by-case (CBC) extension
application for certain Third Third mixed waste generated and stored at 31 of its sites.
DOE requested a one-year extension of the Third Third capacity variance for the mixed
waste addressed in the application. EPA reviewed DOE's application and issued a
proposed finding that DOE had made all hut one of the demonstrations required by 40
CFR 268.5 for a case-by-case extension (57 FR 22024. May 6. 1992). The remaining
demonstration would have required DOE to enter into a binding contractual commitment
to construct or otherwise provide alternative treatment, recovery, or disposal capacity for
the wastes included in the application. As a result of the passage of the Federal
Facilities Compliance Act and the belief expressed by Congress that DOE no longer
needs a CBC ixtension, EPA suspended further processing of ihe CBC.
The Federal Facilities Compliance Act (FFCA) was enacted into law (Public Law
102-386) on October 6, 1992. FFCA amends the Solid Waste Disposal Act (1965) which
was itself previously amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA,
1976) and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA, 1934). Section 102 of
the FFCA waives sovereign immunity for executive branch departments and agencies,
and allows states to impose fines and penalties ;ig;iinst federal facilities for violations of .
RCRA. However, the FFCA delays the effective date of the waiver for mixed waste
storage violations for three years to allow DOE time to prepare plans for the develop-
ment of treatment capacities and technologies for facilities at which DOE generates or
stores mixed waste. Consequently, the FFCA dclnys the effective date of the LDRs until
October, 1995 for surface disposed mixed waste.
5.2 DATA SOURCES
Section 5.2.1 discusses the types of comments that were received in response to '
the October 24, 1991 ANPRM. Section 5.2.2 discusses comments received in response to
the proposed rule. Sections 5.2.3 and 5.2.4 discuss the sources of information on non-
DOE and DOE mixed waste, respectively, that were used to prepare this analysis of
required capacity.
5.2.1 Comments on ANPRM
The Advance Notice of Proposed Rulcmaking (AN'PRM) for Phase H (56 FR
55160, October 24, 1991) requested data and comments on the generation and
management of certain newly listed and identified wastes. Treatment standards for these
wastes are included in today's final rule. In response to Ihe ANPRM, eight commenters
discussed issues relating to the capacity available for the treatment of mixed waste. The
commenters addressed the following major issues:
n*
;s?
e "P
£ Sr E
-
0-
n
00
o
o
Oi
UD
..J
-------
50
» The tack of commercial treatment capacity for mixed waste streams;
• The need for a national capacity variance for mixed waste contaminated
with the newly listed and identified waste; nnd
• The treatment of mixed waste to remove the hazardous portion, thus
allowing the waste to be reclassified and managed as radioactive waste.
Only two commenters provided quantitative information on mixed waste. The
quantitative information consisted mostly of mixed waste generation and characterization
data. Where appropriate, EPA incorporated this information into the analysis of
required capacity (information received from DOE in response to the ANPRM is
discussed in Section 5.2.4). Following its review of the information, EPA believes that
there are little or no additional quantities of mixed waste contaminated with D012
through D017 wastes that are newly identified due to the change in the leaching
procedure. EPA received no data on mixed waste .streams containing coke by-products
(K141-K145, K147-K148) or chlorinated toluenes (K149-K151), and the Agency believes
that few, if any, mixed waste streams exist th;it arc contaminated with K141-K14S and
K147-K151.
5.2.2 Comments on Proposed Rule
In response to the Phase II proposed rule* EPA received six comments concerning
the proposal to grant a two-year national capacity variance for non-soil, non-debris TC
organic mixed radioactive wastes. All six commenters, including DOE, were in favor of
the two-year capacity variance. Furthermore, none of the commenters identified any
additional treatment capacity for the wastes. EPA's responses to these comments may be
found in the Response to Comments Received on the Ncwty Listed Wastes and Hazardous
Soils Proposed Rule to Support 40 CFR 268 Land Disposal Restrictions: Capacity-Related
Comments, which is part of the public docket for this rulemaking.
5.2.3 Non-DOE Mixed Waste Data Sources
For previous LDR rukmakings, EPA has received comments and data concerning
the generation and treatment of mixed waste. Based on these comments, EPA believes
that DOE facilities generate the vast majority of mixed waste. According to the
Background Document for the Third Third LDRs, nun-DOE mixed waste is believed to
account for less than one percent of all mixed waste gent-rated nationwide.37
" EPA. Background Docvmerufor Hunt Third Wautt to \upfaa -tli( IK Part 268 Land Disposal Rumriioni. Final
Rult, Third Third H'osu Vctumt*. Charaacnstici. and Required ami AvutluHr '[rratimru Capacity, Volume III. Apptrutix
B, May 1990.
o
C/3
ts)
71
o
o
uu
CD
.J
-------
5-4
In the process of conducting the analysis of required capacity that appears in
Section S.3, EPA evaluated available data on the generation and treatment of non-DOE
mixed waste contaminated with Phase II wastes. The amount of comprehensive
information available to EPA on these wastes is limited at this time. EPA and the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), however, recently published the results of a
survey designed to "collect information to develop ;i national profile on the volumes,
characteristics, and ireatability of commercially generated mixed wasie." The published
results of the survey are known as the "National Profile on Commercially Generated
Low-Level Radioactive Mixed Waste" (National Profile). The National Profile contains
information on 'ow-ltvel mixed waste generated hy commercial (non-DOE) facilities in
1990 and in storage at these facilities at the end i>l 1990. Data from the National Profile
are discussed further in Section 5.3.
5.2.4 DOE Mixed Waste Data Sources
In response to the ANPRM, DOE submitted comments that contained
information on mixed waste streams affected by the proposed rule. In developing its
comments, DOE focused largely on collecting dala
-------
5-5
stream data were often omitted because many Held sites did not consider TRU waste
streams relevant to the data call.
Section 105 (a) of FFCA required DOE to prepare a mixed waste inventory
report within ISO days of the enactment of FFCA (i.e., by April, 1993). This Interim
Mixed Waste Inventory Report was prepared on time, and included a national inventory
of all mixed wastes that are currently stored or will he generated over the next five years,
and a national inventory of mixed waste treatment capacities and technologies. This
report is currently being updated; however, the Final Mixed Waste Inventory Report
(MWIR) Data Case that will be used to develop the Final MWIR was made public in
May, 1994. This data base provides waste-stream specific information for each DOE site.
Because the data in the MWIR Data Base are more recent and more comprehensive
that those provided in DOE's comment to the ANPRM and the CBC. we have relied on
these data in conducting our capacity analysis for mixed wastes, as discussed below.
S3 RESULTS
This section presents the results of EPA's review of available data on DOE and
non-DOE mixed waste streams contaminated with newly identified hazardous wastes
being restricted in today's rulemaking. Mixed waste containing newly identified TC
pesticide waste, coke by-products, or chlorinated toluenes arc not discussed, as EPA does
not believe that any of these waste currently are being generated.40 This section
presents estimates of the quantities of TC organic mixed waste that will be generated
annually and that are expected to be in storage at both DOE and non-DOE sites.
Section 5.3.1 discusses non-DOE generation and storage of mixed low-level waste and
Section 5.3.2 addresses the quantity of DOE mixed waste generated annually and in
storage.
5-3.1 Non-DOE Generation and Storage of Mixed Low-level Waste
Information collected on individual hazardous constituents present in the mixed
waste streams identified in the National Profile was generally incomplete. As a result,
estimating the quantities of non-DOE low-level mixed waste that contain newly identified1
TC organic wastes is not possible and is not specifically addressed in this subsection.
However the results from the National Profile do provide the most recent overall picture
of non-DOE low-level mixed waste generation.
Results from the National Profile presented in Exhibits 5-1 and 5-2 include
estimates of the types and quantities of non-DOE low-level mixed wastes that were
generated in 1990, as well as the total quantities of non-DOE low-level mixed wastes in
storage at the end of 1990. The National Profile identifies five non-DOE sectors that are
»" According to the MWIR Daia Bait, none of these wastes j:c currently hemg generated or scored ai any DOE site.
In addition. EPA has not received any indication from o&et vurccv ihjl these wastes are hem j generated.
«
-"
Is
ri o i»
8
O
(73
O
O
Oi
uu
!
-------
5-6
sources of mixed waste: academic, government, industrial, medical, and nuclear power
plants. The quantities of mixed waste generated by each of these sectors in 1990 and the
quantities of mixed waste stored by each of these sectors at the end of 1990 are listed
and identified below in Exhibit 5-1. The National Profile's estimate of annual non-DOE
low-level mixed waste generation is greater than the estimate developed in the Third
Third capacity analysis. EPA believes, however, thai ihe newer data are more complete
and therefore more reliable.
» 5
EXHIBIT 5.1
SOURCES OF NON-DOE MIXED WASTE
GENERATED OR IN STORAGE IN 1990
Sector
Academic
Government
Industrial
Medical
Nuclear Power Plants
TOTAL
1990 Generation
fmV)
X21
750
I.4M
564
J86
3.949
Amount Stored
-------
o
5-7
EXHIBIT 5-2
TYPES OF NON-DOE MIXED WASTE
GENERATED OR IN STORAGE IN 1990
Wwte Tyft
Organic;
Liquid Scintillation Fluids (LSFi)"
Waste Oil'
Chlorinated Organics*
Fluorinaied Organic*
Chlorinated Fluorocarbons (CFCs)
Other Organics
Corrosive Liquids
LewlWulcs
Mercury Wtstes
Chromium Wtstcs
Cadmium W«ste*
Other H*zardous MMertaU
TOTAL
1990 CrnrnMlnn
(mjl
:.«37
W
71
1)
IB
275
HO
X2
13
28
0.25
.VII
3.949
Amount Stored «s of
12/31/90 (m*)
363
178
27
4
255
US
12
139
81
S3
745
141
2,116
M*y contain Be»ly idtaufied TC orpaic wute.
Source Oik Ridft Natioul Laboratory, ffaaaaal Ffofk en C<
NUREO/CR.5»3«. ORNL-4731. Deccralxr 1992.
•uOlf C.watd Lou-Lrvcl OalioocA* Matd Want,
may contain newly regulated TC organic wastes. Hie RODs did not identify any mixed
debris.
53.2 DOE-Generated Mixed Waste
This section summarizes and evaluates DOE data on the quantities of newly
identiGed TC organic DOE mixed waste generated annually and in storage. The data are
organized by each of the newly identified TC organic waste codes. Although the
proposed rule addresses treatment standards for newly identified TC pesticide wastes
(D012-D017) that were not previously hazardous by I he old EP test, none of the data
identified any DOE mixed waste contaminated with newly identified pesticide wastes.
pill
I * *Z."
S8S
O
C/Q
K>
71
o
o
'""U
UJ
-------
4
5-8
Consequently, EPA believes that very small quantities (if any) of mixed waste containing
newly identified TC pesticide wastes exist at DOE facilities. Therefore, the analysis of
Phase I! DOE mixed wastes presented in this chapter focuses on mixed wastes containing
newly identified TC organic wastes.
Exhibit 5-3 presents EPA's estimates of the quantities of newly identified TC
organic high-level waste (HLW), mixed transuranic wastes (MTRU), and mixed low-level
wastes (MLLW) that are generated annually and that currently are in storage at all DOE
sites.41 These estimates include only waste streams that carry at least one of the TC
organic waste codes and do not carry any other RCRA listed waste codes. Many cf the
waste streams in the data submitted by DOE contained more than one newly identified
TC oiganic waste code; therefore, this exhibit shows the total quantity of all mixed
organic TC wastes, as well as the quantity carrying each wnste code. Please note that
summing across waste codes may result in double-counting.
Of the mixed TC organic wastes currently in storage, approximately 45 percent are
MTRU, 35 percent are MLLW and 20 percent are HLW. The total quantity of waste
currently in storage is 51,000 m . In contrast, the projected annual generation rate for .
1994 is a total of 2,700 m3, with almost 50 percent HLW, 40 percent MLLW, and 10
percent MTRU. As can be seen in the exhibit, much of the mixed waste carries more
than one TC organic waste code.
Exhibit 5-4 breaks out both the current inventory and the annual generation of
newly identified mixed organic TC wastes by waste type. As shown, the majority of the
MTRU and MLLW is considered to be hazardous debris, while most of the HLW is
aqueous liquid or slurry. The quantity of hazardous soil in storage or projected to be
generated in 1994 is very small. This can be attributed to the fact that the MWTR Data
Base generally does not include DOE environmental restoration wastes. When these
wastes are generated they will increase the quantity of newly identified mixed wastes,
particularly soil, that require treatment. Although these wastes are not included in the
Final MWIR Data Base, the IMWIR estimates that DOE will generate approximately
600,000 m of mixed environmental restoration wastes over the period from 1993 to
1997.42
"The estimate of ihe quantity generated annually is based on KIC projections of the quantity that will (x generated in
1994.
'• Some of these wastes may be organic TC mixed radioactnc soils.
"
&a«r *
• o ™ *-
0 a 2
| c 3
O
71
O
O
Oj
UJ
un
-------
5-9
EXHIBIT 5-3
QUANTITY OF DOE TC ORGANIC MIXED RADIOACTIVE WASTE
GENERATED OR IN STORAGE
Waste Code
D018
D019
D020
D021
D022
DOB
DOZ4
D025
DQ26
D027
D028
D029
0030
DQ31
D032
D033
D034
DOSS
D036
D037
D038
D039
D040
D04I
D042
D043
ToUl
Current Inventory (nr*)
HLW
10,452
10,727
0
10,452
10.452
0
0
0
10.452
0
10.452
0
0
0
10.452
0
10.452
10.452
0
0
0
0
10.452
0
0
0
10.727
MTRU
5.044
5,043
0
20
17302
5.022
5,022
5,022
5.043
0
103%
11,882
0
0
20
0
20
20
0
0
0
0
22
0
0
0
23,001
MLLW
4,914
3.088
36
179
8,189
2,856
2,839
2,895
2.9SS
132
W77
11.090
79
91
131
46
111
914
0
0
0
0
879
35
.W
134
17.427
Annum! Generation (m3/jr)
1ILW
1,165
1.282
0
1.165
1.165
0
0
0
1.165
0
1,165
0
0
0
1.165
0
1,165
1.165
0
0
0
0
1.165
0
0
0
1.282
MTRU
378
378
0
7
378
371
371
37!
378
0
7
0
0
0
7
0
7
7
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
379
MLLW
732
496
3
409
590
44
44
44
450
28
502
109
3
2
409
3
409
649
0
0
0
0
529
3
3
0
1.061
Source Rui Mixed Wuu [AVCQKXJI Report Dan B*K. May. rw.
Note Rows do eoc MIB bediae ioae *wic iiraai carry m-*r ih-in «nc
O-O-K*
• o n *~
Sg-3
l!a
o
00
to
71
o
o.
cn
-------
5-10
EXHIBIT S-4
TYPES Ofr DOE TC ORGANIC MIXED RADIOACTIVE WASTE
GENERATED OR IN STORAGE
Waste Tjpc
Aqueous Liquids/Slurries
Organic Liquids
Solid Process Residues
Soils
Debris
Lab Packs
Compressed Gases
Other
Total*
Current Inventory (mj)
HLW
6.998
0
3.729
0
0
0
0
0
10,727
MTRU
0
2
4.461
0
18.339
0
0
200
23.001
M1J.W
206
1,276
I. Ml
24
1X054
7f>
2
242
17,427
Annual Generation Rate
(mV)
1ILW
h!7
0
465
0
0
0
0
0
1,282
MTRU
0
0
0
0
378
1
0
0
379
MLLW
16S
130
76
10
645
24
0
8
1.061
c "£
o y
KM g
&*£*
o
C/3
to
71
o
o
Source Final Mind Waob* fovratwy Report Data Bise. Mty IVM,
•TouJ nay not vtm 4we to rouadiag.
5.4 AVAILABLE CAPACITY FOR MIXED WASTE
5.4.1 Existing and Planned Non-DOE Capacity
Currently, only five commercial facilities nationwide hold or are in the process of
obtaining RCRA permits to treat mixed RCRA/radkwietive waste, including waste
scintillation fluids. Two facilities, one each in Florida and Texas, currently hold RCRA
Pan B Permits for the storage and processing of mixed waste. A third facility, located in
Tennessee, holds a Pan B Permit for the storage of mixed waste and is operating a waste
fuel boiler under RCRA interim status. A founh facility, Incited in Colorado, stores and
processes mixed wastes under interim status, and h;is submitted an application for a Pan
B Permit. A second facility in Tennessee currently (rents low-level radioactive waste and
has submitted an application for a Pan B Permit in order to process mixed RCRA/radio-
active waste. Only one facility, located in Utah, is permitted to land dispose mixed
RCRA/radioactive wastes. The types of waste disposed ;il this facility are constrained by
the facility's RCRA permit and NRC license. Other th;m these facilities, EPA is aware
-------
5-11
of no other non-DOE facilities that are permitted to irc;it, store, or dispose of mixed
RCRA/radioactive wastes.
According to the National Profile, a total of 41,000 nvVyr of capacity is available
for treatment of commercially-generated low-level mixed wastes at the four facilities
currently accepting these wastes. This treatment capacity is spread over various technol-
ogies, including bulking/vial shredding followed by storage (for liquid scintillation fluids,
LSFs); incineration; stabilization; chemical oxidation and reduction; neutralization;
cleaning, decontamination, and macroencapsulation (for lend materials); and solidifica-
tion. Approximately 33,000 m3fyr of this treatment capacity is available for the bulking
and storage of liquiu mixed wastes, mainly LSFs. for radioactive decay prior to incinera-
tion. However, EPA docs not consider storage for radioactive decay in determining
available treatment capacity, and therefore these facilities dn not provide any treatment
capacity for incinerable mixed wastes. The remaining 8,000 m3/yr of capacity appears
sufficient to manage the more than 6,000 mj of non-DOE mixed waste that required
treatment in 1990 (the annual generation + amount in storage), but no capacity currently
exists for 300 m3 of the total amount.43
5.4.2 Existing and Planned DOE Capacity
As part of its CBC extension application, DOE performed a comprehensive search
for commercial facilities capable of treating mixed RCRA/radioactive waste. DOE
concluded that only very limited commercial treatment capacity exists nationwide to treat
its mixed RCRA/radioactive waste. The existing capacity that was identified was limited
to the treatment of liquid scintillation fluids.
As part of its comments on the ANPRM, DOE submitied a series of appendices
from its CBC application that provide information on 45 mixed RCRA/radioactive waste
treatment facilities at 13 DOE sites. Subsequently, DOE modified its CBC application by
withdrawing certain treatment facilities and adding another; reducing the total number of
mixed waste treatment facilities to 36 (57 FR 22024, May 26, 1992). EPA evaluated this
information in order to determine the amount of available mixed waste treatment
capacity at DOE facilities.
In addition, as part of the data call described earlier, DOE requested its field sites
to indicate whether their treatment units were capable (if accepting mixed RCRA/radio-
active wastes contaminated with newly identified TC organic wastes. Not all of the DOE
field sites responded by the internal deadline; DOE received responses concerning only
15 of the 45 existing or planned mixed RCRA/radioactive waste treatment units originally
included in the CBC. All 15 of these units, however, were unable to accept mixed
RCRA/radioactive wastes contaminated with newly identified TC organic wastes. The
"This 300 ions includes CFCs and lead shielding for »Ri-l there a nor .idri)uJic treatment capacity.
o
71
o
o
-------
5-12
units are either not technically capable of accepting TC organic*, or are not allowed to
do so by their permit or permit application. Some units face both of these difficulties.
EPA'j review of the IMWIR indicates that 4,000 m* of treatment capacity are
available annually for HLW at three DOE treatment systems. The available capacity
appears sufficient to treat the estimated average annuaH generation. However, the
IMWIR indicates that the current national inventory of HLW is greater than 280,000 m3.
This quantity dwarfs DOE's annual available treatment capacity for HLW. Consequently,
DOE faces a treatment capacity shortfall for high-level mixed radioactive wastes.
DOE is developing the Waste Isolation Pilot Project (WIPP) in New Mexico as a.
permanent repository for DOE TRU wastes, including MTRU wastes. However, EPA
has not yet authorized DOE to begin the placement of TRU wastes in the WIPP. In
addition, wastes received at the WIPP must meet DOE's WIPP Waste Acceptance
Criteria (WIPP-WAC). DOE is still in the planning stages for facilities designed to
prepare MTRU wastes for shipment to the WIPP. As a result, DOE faces a capacity
shortfall for treatment of MTRU wastes.
EPA's review of the IMWIR indicates that 300 rrrVyr of currently available
capacity exists at four DOE treatment systems for the treatment of alpha MLLW.
(MLLW may be categorized as either alpha or non-alpha depending on the transuranic
alpha content.) However, the available capacity is greatly exceeded by the estimated
quantity of alpha MLLW requiring treatment annually over the next five years, 3,700 m3.
Consequently, DOE faces a treatment capacity shortfall for non-soil, non-debris alpha
MLLW.
According to'IMWIR, 1,000,000 m3/yr of treatment capacity among 26 systems are
currently available to treat non-alpha (i.e., less than 10 nCi/g transuranic alpha content)
MLLW. However, LMWIR states that most of DOE's currently available treatment
capacity for MLLW is represented by facilities limited to the treatment of wastewaters
(defined by DOE as less than 1 percent total suspended solids (TSS)). While these
treatment facilities provide excess capacity for MLLW wastewaters, they cannot process
wastes with high TSS and are not readily adaptable for other waste forms. Thus,
although the quantity of MLLW treatment capacity is greater than the total quantity of
mixed wastes, DOE faces a treatment capacity shortfall for minwastewater MLLW, and
thus non-alpha MLLW.
The IMWtR indicates that no available treatment capacity exists at DOE facilities
for mixed radioactive soils. In addition, EPA's review of IMWIR data indicates that 16
m fyr of currently available capacity exists at one DOE facility for the treatment of high-
level mixed radioactive debris, an amount that exceeds the estimated annual generation.
As noted above, EPA has not authorized DOE to begin placement of MTRU wastes into
the WIPP. As a result, DOE faces a treatment capacity shortfall for mixed transuranic
debris. Finally, review of IMWIR reveals that less than 2 m3/yr of treatment capacity is
, rr*
0.0,
o
GO
N>
T1
o
o
UU
UQ
-------
5-13
available that can accept mixed low-level debris. Thus, DOE faces a treatment capacity
shortfall for both alpha and non-alpha mixed law-level debris.
While DOE has provided its best available data on mixed waste generation,
uncertainty remains about mixed waste generation at DOE (and non-DOE) facilities.
For example, as discussed above, the MW1R data generally did not include DOE
environmental restoration wastes which, when generated, will increase the quantity of
newly identified mixed wastes that require treatment. The IMWIR estimates that DOE
will generate 600,000 m3 of mixed environmental restoration wastes (primarily MLLW)
over the period from 1993 to 1997. Although the IMWIR notes that the estimates of
DOE environmental restoration wastes arc preliminary, any quantity of this magnitude
will place additional strains on DOE's limited available mixed waste treatment capacity.
In addition, although uncertainty exists as the total quantities of TC organic mixed wastes
generated at DOE and non-DOE facilities that are affected by today's rule, EPA believes
that insufficient treatment capacity exists for these wastes at both DOE and commercial
sites.
5.5 NATIONAL CAPACITY VARIANCE FOR MIXED RCRA/RADIOACTIYE
WASTES
Based on the analysis presented above, EPA believes that DOE generates a large
majority oC mixed RCRA/radioactive wastes affected by this rulemaking and previous
.' ~} LDR rulemakings, and that major treatment capacity shortfalls currently exist for
^•^ previously regulated mixed RCRA/radioactK-c wastes generated at both DOE and non-
DOE facilities. As a result, EPA has determined that there is currently no BOAT or
equivalent available treatment capacity for any newly listed mixed RCRA/radioactive
wastes at DOE or non-DOE facilities. Because a treatment capacity shortfall was
identified for every mixed RCRA/radioactive waste treatability group, EPA is today
granting a two-year national capacity variance for all mixed RCRA/radioactive wastes
contaminated with newly listed and identified wastes for which treatment standards are
included in this rulemaking.
f!
O
CO
to
O
O
CD
i
-------
CHAPTER 6
HAZARDOUS SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH
NEWLY LISTED AND IDENTIFIED WASTES
This capacity analysis focuses on hazardous soil contaminated with wastes whose ••
treatment standards are promulgated by the Phase I! LDRs. The hazardous soil covered
by this rule includes soi! contaminated with D018-D043 organic TC wastes, and soils
contaminated with coke-by product wastes and chlorinated toluene wastes. This chapter
first discusses the estimated quantity of TC soils that would require off-site treatment,
approximately 70,000 to 120,000 tons. The next three sections describe the methodology
and information used to determine the quantity of soil requiring alternative commercial
treatment from surface impoundment closures, routine and sporadic activities, and CBI
facilities, respectively. The final section summarizes the results of the capacity analysis
for Phase II hazardous soils.
To estimate the total quantity of land-disposed TC soil, EPA used several data
sources:
• Responses to the Advance Notice to the Proposed Rule'making (ANPRM)
for the newly identified wastes (56 FR 55160, October 24, 1991);
• The newly developed TC data set discussed earlier in Chapter 3;
• Information provided during a series of roundtable meetings held by
the Agency in May and June of 1991 with representatives of
companies involved in the management and disposal of hazardous
soil; and
* Telephone contacts with individual generators.
S.I TC SOILS REQUIRING OFF-SITE TREATMENT
When the Phase II LDRs were proposed, the Agency estimated that
approximately 233,000 tons per year of TC soils would require off-site commercial
i reatment and the majority of these TC soils would be generated from surface
impoundment closures. Based on new data received from owners/operators concerning
: urface impoundment closure practices, the Agency misestimates that the annual
quantities of TC soil that is land disposed and subject to the LDRs ranges from 70,000 to
:20,000 tons. Because TC soil generation from surface impoundment closures is
somewhat discretionary, decisions by owners/operators of facilities concerning closure
methods resulted in significant changes in the generation rates previously estimated in the
TC Survey.
The Agency confirmed generation and land disposal rates with those facilities that
the Agency expected to generate TC soils from surface impoundment closures in 1993,
1994, and 1995. Nearly all of the owners/operators revised their estimates for TC soil
s
**!>
o
GO
O
o
-JC
-------
•6-2
generation downward. Most owners/operators revised their closure practices to minimize
or eliminate TC soil generation. Some facilities closed impoundments prior to today's
rulemaking and other facilities are closing their impoundments as landfills. In closing as
a landfill, a facility closes the impoundment with the waste in place. The facility
owners/operators remove all free liquid, stabilize the sludges, cap the impoundment, and
establish a ground water monitoring system. Therefore, for these facilities, no alternative
commercial treatment capacity would be necessary for TC soils. The Agency also
reviewed the TC Survey and public information on specific facilities to assess the TC soil
generation rate from routine and sporadic activities th.it might require off-site disposal.
6.2 METHODOLOGY USED TO ESTIMATE TC SOILS GENERATED BY
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT CLOSURES REQUIRING OFF-SITE
TREATMENT
Promulgation of the TC rule created a series of deadlines for owners and
operators of surface impoundments managing waste that is newly identified as hazardous.
Surface impoundment closures create the greatest concern because of the large quantities
of TC soils that may need off-site treatment. On Ihe other hand, retrofitting surface
impoundments to meet the MTRs should not affect the capacity analysis because any off-
site disposal of soils occurred by the end of March 1994. Alternatively, owners can close
their surface impoundments as landfills. In closing as a landfill, (he facility closes the
impoundment with the waste in place. The facility owners or operators will remove all
free liquid, stabilize the sludges, cap the impoundment, and establish a ground water
monitoring system. Similarly, the conversion of surface impoundments to Subtitle D units
should not present capacity difficulties because little TC soils will be generated during
conversion activities.
' Because of the possibility of extensions to the MTR requirement deadlines,
uncertainty existed regarding the following issues:.
• The number of owners or operators who will seek extensions;
• Whether EPA or authorized states will grant extensions;
» Definition of criteria for obtaining an extension;
* Time allowed for on-site TC soil management (i.e., when must the material
be shipped off-site); and
• The number of surface impoundments that will close as landfills.
6.2.1 Resolving Capacity Issues
In order to resolve the issues of capacity and the potential impacts of deadline
extensions, EPA reviewed the TC Survey results :md contacted generators of TC soils
requiring off-site treatment in 1993 and 1994. In 1993, about 28 facilities without LDR
treatment units were projected to transfer TC soils off-site because of surface
impoundment closures. However, EPA's review of the quantity of TC soils actually
= »> S
-
filiS
.
sr
0 a
O
71
o
O
-JC
-------
6-3
generated in 1993 by some of ihese facilities appears to he over 115,000 tons lower than
expected (see Exhibit 6-1). EPA confirmed wfth the generators whether closures took
place, the reasons for discrepancies in projected and actual generation rates, and the
expected timing of future TC soil removal (e.g., prior to mid-August 1994).
Based on EPA's discussions with facilities, a number of delays occurred that
prevented the closure of many surface impoundments scheduled lo close in 1993.
Consequently, the actual generation rates for 1993 were much lower than originally
estimated. The actual closure of these remaining impoundments could impact the
demand for alternative treatment due to the LDRs. If the TC soils expected to have
been generated by surface impoundment closure in 1993 is deferred until after the
promulgation of the Phase II LDRs, these additional quantities may affect the national
capacity for LDR treatment.
For some of the facilities originally scheduled to generate TC soils in 1993, the
delay should not affect LDR treatment capacity. Two of the facilities, BASF Corp. and
BP Oil - Alliance, do not expect to generate TC soils because they plan to close their
surface impoundments as landfills in 1994. In addition, while Phillips - Sweeney expects
to generate almost 32,000 tons of TC soils, it plans in complete closure prior to the
expected LDR promulgation date of mid-August. No LDR treatment capacity will be
necessary for these TC soils.
However, for the other two facilities, Fina Oil and Total Petroleum, some
uncertainty exists concerning the ability of these facilities to ship al! of their TC soils off-
site prior to the effective date of the LDRs; their combined estimates for TC soils are
approximately 5,400 tons. These facilities would not confirm whether they might seek
deadline extensions. Even if these facilities generate all their TC soils after mid-August,
the impact on LDR treatment capacity will be minimal. In addition, the 5,400 ton TC
soil estimate may be loo high because most of the wastes disposed in the surface
impoundment were F037-F038. These surface impoundment may never have managed
wastes identified as TC by the TCLP, but soils under the liners may fail TC because of
the accumulation of benzene over the years. On the other hand, the possibility exists
that little or no TC soil will be found during closure. Total Petroleum is currently
conducting tests on its surface impoundment soils to determine if the soils are considered
TC wastes.
The TC Survey also predicted generation of TC soils in 1994 and 1995 and follow-
up telephone conversations with facilities updated expected generation rates (see Exhibit
6-2). Based on these estimates, approximately 25,000 tons of TC soils from surface
impoundments will be land-disposed off-site in IV94. However, according to the facilities,
all of this TC soil should have undergone final disposal prior to the mid-August deadline
and will not require LDR treatment capacity. Of the other facilities contacted, one
facility plans to close as landfills and bioremediate its surface impoundments without
generating TC soils. The last facility, Lyondell Petroleum - Houston, does not expect to
o
o
oo
b>>
71
o
o
•••*
-c
LU
-------
O
g
]
U
If
If
IP.
11
|f
ll
In
""* u
2>
3
*
I
~
2
ndmenu as landfil
i
E
o
B
e
§
*
£•
5
»
i
c
~i
ndmcnu as Uindfi
1
E
i
•5
S
I
o
•
§
a
a
a
J!
?
O
B.
a
i"--
5
u c —
scheduled to clus
in impoundmcnl i
impoundment wil
c 3 3£
1 sil
Two impound
Plan to close i
Final closure <
delayed uniil 1
§
§
o
K"
O
£
!*
i.1?
a 3
f cU»urc ptiD tmi
lore t&e effectnv i
- Z
£ g
A»-lilirtj! ippr
(vunplcte ctoi
LDRi.
I
e
«
f
v;
.£.
2
f
I
§
: same amount as
17-FIU*;
soils.
-S,^
S a*
Currently apt
Musi wastes a
Testing 10 see
*
o
1
e
a
-------
I
2
5
b.
O
HI 6
H
15
« e
su
1W
be
Due lo misidentiflcalio
need to be closed.
While a wail ing plan approval,
the facility is working to remo
before promulgation uf LDR
Conducting a risk assessme
Expect lo complete clusurc
e disagreement about
idered adequate.
a
e impoundment by dc
ed lo be primary wast
stes.
Expect to
F037 anti
some D01
as.
I
s--
Expect lo close impoundments by d
F037 anticipated to be primary wast
some DO 18 wastes.
= 1
d£
expect to ge
calmcni.
O
CO
to
T1
o
o
-------
6-6
generate any TC soils thai wit] require off-site treatment. No facility contacted
anticipated seeking an extension to the MTR requirement deadlines.
AM the owners or operators of surface impoundments that originally predicted TC
soil generation in 1995 changed their estimate to indicate (hat no TC soil would be
generated after 1994 (see Exhibit 6-2). Of those facilities thai originally predicted TC
soil generation in 1993, only Fina Oil mentioned that a surface impoundment would be
closed in 199S. Fina Oil stated that an aeration impoundment would be closed but could
not estimate TC soil generation rates.
63 TC SOIL GENERATION FROM ROUTINE AND SPORADIC ACTIVITIES
The Agency also assessed the TC soil generation rate from routine and sporadic
activities that might require off-site disposal. For this analysis, the Agency assumed that
routine activities, and the quantity of soil generated, should be considered constant over
time when analyzing the generator population as a whole. However, for sporadic
activities (e.g., surface impoundment closures), which by their nature occur infrequently,
the year in which they occur is critically important in determining the required capacity
for soil following the effective date of the Phase II rule.
To perform the analysis, EPA used information from the TC Surveys, phone logs,
and summaries (since the surveys provided data only through 1992, EPA derived 1993
TC data using the phone logs). EPA reviewed the surveys first, and then used the
phone logs and summaries to verify the results derived from the surveys. EPA used the
following methodology to complete the analysis:
• EPA reviewed each survey to determine if soil was a waste
component and, if so, whether soil was the physical form of waste in
the waste stream, the quantity of TC soil in the waste stream, and
the disposal method of the TC soil.
• Once EPA determined that TC soil existed at a particular facility,
EPA entered the following information into a database: EPA
identification number, facility name, type of waste generation
(routine, sporadic, remedial), origin of waste (on or off site),
quantity of TC soil, quantity of mixtures contaminated with TC soil,
and comments.
* EPA resolved conflicting responses as best as possible, given
information available, and explained how it did so (if applicable) in
the comment section of the data bnse.
• When the TC soil was reported to be combined with debris, and no
percentage of soil was provided. EPA assumed a 50/50 percentage
O
O
O
-------
6-7
•-•1
'A*
/. i
'*:*
of soil and debris. When a survey report provided a range of soil
for a particular waste stream. EPA used ihe mid-point of the range
to calculate the amount of soil in the waste Mrcam. Once it selected
a mid-point, EPA created a second d:\tn base to indicate the new
TC soil quantities.
• When survey forms were incomplete but some form of hazardous
waste generation reports44 were provided, EPA converted monthly
volumes to annual volumes. EPA also used these reports to
determine the type of waste generated and the origin of the waste.
• Where surveys reported soil quantity as pounds or cubic yards, EPA
used conversion factors of 2,000 pounds/ton, or 1.2 tons/cubic yard.
• In the final phase of the analysis, on a ffidlity-by-facility basis, EPA
compared the new TC soil and soil/debris mixture quantities with the
phone logs and summaries in order to identify any errors. EPA also
compared the quantities to quantities extracted from the TC Survey
data base described in Chapter 3. EPA corrected inconsistencies or
explained them by reviewing the data sources and by using
professional judgment.
For the lower bound estimate (70,000 tons), as mentioned above, the Agency used
the 50-50 ratio of soil and debris in mixtures characterized as soil and debris. Using this
assumption, EPA estimates that approximately 70,000 tons cf TC soils generated by
routine and sporadic activities will require additional treatment annually. In addition, for
this lower bound estimate, the Agency assumed that all facilities were able to manage the
TCsoils generated from surface impoundment closures prior to the effective date of
today's rule. Therefore, for the lower bound estimate, no TC soils from surface
impoundment closures are expected to require additional treatment capacity. Based on
these assumptions, the Agency calculates that the lower bound estimate is 70,000 tons of
TC soils per year.
For the upper bound estimate, the Agency assigned the entire quantity of mixtures
of soil and debris reported in the TC Survey as TC soils. As a result, the TC soil
generation rate for routine and sporadic activities increased by about 20,000 tons to
approximately 90,000 tons of TC soils per year.
To verify the accuracy of the upper bound estimate, the Agency contacted
individual facilities to determine actual TC soil generation rates. Based on these
o
71
o
o
" To reduce the burden on chc facilities required to compteie ihc 1C Survey. liPA allowed respondents 10 submit
hazardous waste generation rcpora prepared for other purpwci anJ rnnuinmg the same information as required by the
survey.
-JC
—J
-------
6-8
contacts, the TC data base overestimated TC soil generation from routine and sporadic
activities by approximately 8,000 tons. Many facilities Mined thai actual generation rates
were lower or thai the estimate included one-time wastes from surface impoundment
closures that already occurred. Therefore, the Agency revised the upper bound estimates
for TC soil generation rates for routine and sporadic activities at ihese facilities to
approximately 82,000 tons per year.
After adding the 5,300 tons of TC soils generated by surface impoundment
closures, the estimated upper bound quantity of TC soil requiring additional treatment is
approximately 90,000 tons per year.
6A TC SOIL GENERATION AND LAND DISPOSAL FROM FACILITIES
SUBMITTING CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION
The Agency conducted a similar review of facilities that submitted confidential
business information (CBI) concerning TC soil generation rales. In developing the lower
bound estimate for TC soil generation, EPA assumed no generation from the CBI
facilities. In establishing the upper bound, EPA assumed that 100 percent of the
mixtures were TC soils. These facilities were estimated to generate an additional 53,000
tons of TC soils.
EPA contacted some of the CBI facilities to determine actual soil generation
rates. Based on these contacts, the TC data base overestimated TC soil generation from
routine and sporadic activities by approximately 23,000 tons. As with the non-CBI
facilities, many CBI facilities stated that actual generation rates were lower or that the
estimate included one-time wastes from surface impoundment closures that already
occurred. Therefore, the revised estimate for TC soil generation for routine and sporadic
activities from CBI facilities is approximately 30,000 tons per year.
63 CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR HAZARDOUS SOIL
Due to reduced generation of TC soils from surface impoundment closures in
1994 and 1995, and overestimates of TC soil generation rates from routine and sporadic
activities, the Agency estimates that between 70,000 and 120,000 tons per year of TC
soils will require off-site commercial treatment. EPA considers the lower bound estimate
to be more probable than the upper bound estimate of 120,000 tons. Nevertheless, for
decision-making purposes, the Agency used the more conservative, upper bound estimate
of 120,000 tons of TC soils that will require off-site commercial treatment. EPA does not
believe that there are significant quantities of soil contaminated with the other newly
listed wastes covered in this rule that will require off-site commercial treatment capacity.
EPA believes the TC soils can be treated to meet LDR standards by using
combustion technologies. EPA has determined that there is adequate sludge/solid
combustion capacity to accommodate these wastes. Therefore, the Agency is not
ftS-o
s
o
o
o
-c
CD
-------
•
6-9
granting a capacity variance for soil contaminated with newly listed and identified wastes'
covered under this ruling.
O
' -«s
Ifji
3 og
g *
a a
o
o
o
Oj
-c
UQ
-------
CHAPTER 7
HAZARDOUS DEBRIS CONTAMINATED
WITH NEWLY LISTED AND IDENTIFIED WASTES
This chapter presents the data and methodology used to support the capacity
analysis for hazardous debris contaminated with newly listed and identified wastes.
Specifically, this chapter presents the estimates of the quantities of hazardous debris that
will require alternative treatment prior to land disposal as a result of this rule. This
analysis uses data from several sources: the Questionnaire for Facilities that Land
Dispose Newly Identified Organic Wastes Exhibiting the Toxicity Characteristic (TC
Survey); comments and data received in response to the recently promulgated rule on the
Land Disposal Restrictions of Newly Listed Wastes and Hazardous Debris (57 FR
37193), also known as the Phase I rule; industry roundiable meetings; and several other
data sources.
This chapter is organized into three sections. Section 7.1 summarizes the available
information sources on hazardous debris, Section 7.2 presents the methodology and
results of the analysis of required capacity, and Section 7.3 presents the results of the
capacity analysis. .
7.1 DATA SOURCES
7.1.1 Questionnaire for Facilities that Land Dispose Newly Identified Organic Wastes
Exhibiting the Toxicity Characteristic
In April and May 1992, EPA conducted the TC Survey by sending a questionnaire
to land disposal facilities that manage newly identified TC organic wastes in land-based
, units or depose of these wastes using underground injection wells. The effort covered
139 facilities that had submitted permit modifications or received interim status for
managing the newly identified TC organic waste codes (D01.8-D043). EPA did not
specifically target RCRA corrective action sites and Superfund cleanup sites as sources of
newly identified TC organic wastes.4*
For each facility targeted by the survey, EPA requested waste stream-specific data
on newly identified TC organic wastes, including the waste code of the waste stream, the
physical form of the waste stream (including hazardous debris), and the type of
generation (including routine generation, remediation-derived waste, and waste derived
from closure of surface impoundments). EPA also requested information on cm-site land
disposal units and treatment systems.
> !»
Q.D. j
** Some of the debrii from remedial actions managed in o-mrarra.il landfills are captured by (he TC Survey.
However, there are likely to be additional quantities of remedu:>c
-------
;:•<
•M
j»
;>-.*
.0.
7-2
EPA has prepared a data set from the results of the data collection. This data set
contains information on the quantities of newly identified organic TC wastes that will
require commercial treatment capacity as a result of the LDRs. Based on the data
collected, EPA projected waste quantities for 1992 through 1995 by adjusting 1991
routinely generated quantities for future waste minimization and regulatory actions
expected by the respondents.
7.1.2 Comments to the Phase I Proposed Rule
The January 9, 1992 Proposed Phase I Rule (57 FR 958) presented the
methodology for and the results of EPA's preliminary capacity analysis for hazardous
debris. In the proposed rule, the Agency solicited comments on its approach as well as
estimates of available treatment capacity.
EPA received over 100 debris-related comments in response to the proposed rule.
Of these, 45 comments discussed issues relating to capacity available for contaminated
debris. Many of the comments dealt with issues concerning hazardous debris in general,
while other comments focused on debris contaminated with specific types of waste. In
addition to commenting on debris contaminated with previously listed and identified
waste and the newly listed and identified wastes covered in the Phase I rule, several
commenters also-discussed debris contaminated with newly listed and identified Phase II
wastes, such as the newly identified TC organic wastes. The commenters raised the
following major issues:
• Underestimation of the quantity of contaminated debris generated;
* Total volume of debris generated;
• Capacity variances for hazardous debris contaminated with
newly listed and identified wastes;
• Materials handling problems with hazardous debris;
• Concerns about treatment capacity for hazardous debris; and
• Concerns about storage capacity for contaminated debris.
7.1 J Roundtable Meetings
As part of the Agency's efforts to gain a more complete understanding of capacity
issues associated with the LDRs for hazardous debris. EPA held three roundtable
meetings, in May and June of 1991, with representatives of companies that generate or
manage these wastes. The roundtable meetings covered a broad range of topics.
--
•
o
71
o
o
un
j
-------
7-3
including generation and management of hazardous debris, composition of hazardous
debris, and capacity issues. The following summarizes the three meetings:
• The first roundtable meeting included representatives from seven waste
management companies who operate commercial landfills, and a
representative from the National Solid Waste Management Association;
• The second roundtable meeting was attended by representatives from 13
companies that generate and primarily miinage hazardous debris in on-site
landfills; and
• The third roundtable meeting included waste treaters and brokers from
sevc.t firms.
7. U.I Quantities and Composition of Hazardous Debris
In these roundtable discussions, industry participants provided information on the
quantity and composition of hazardous debris generated ;md/or managed by their
companies. Most participants provided quantity estimates of the proportion of the total
waste volumes they manage that could be classified as debris. Of the 1 1 generators that
estimated the volume of debris waste managed on-site, four estimated that debris
comprised 10 percent or less of the total waste volume they manage; three estimated that
debris accounted for between 10 and 25 percent of the loial, three reported that debris
contributed to about SO percent of the waste managed on-site, and one generator
estimated that debris comprised almost 80 percent of the loial waste landfilled.
One representative of a commercial landfill estimated that 75 to 80 percent of all
deliveries to landfills contain some type of debris. Pr.ictically all deliveries of wastes from
remedial actions are believed to contain at least some debris. A second landfill operator
estimated that approximately 30 percent of the waste stream volume received could be
classified as debris.
Waste generators noted that debris comprises a lurge diversity of materials, often
generated on an irregular basis. Some of the most common types of debris include
construction debris, wood, rocks, bottles, and miscellaneous equipment ranging from
laboratory gloves to empty containers, filters, and pipes. Participants also noted that
filters come in all sizes and shapes and that, although they are typically made of some
type of metal, they also can be made of such materials as polypropylene, dacron, and
nylon. In addition, there are also activated carbon filters, caustic filters, and clay filters.
Representatives from commercial landfill companies noted that some types of
debris such as personal protective equipment, spill cleanup materials, and contaminated
scrap metal and equipment are universally generated, whereas the generation of some
other types of debris may vary among the different region of the United States.
O
00
N>
71
o
O
un
-------
i
7-4
Participants also remarked that some debris waste streams are recurrent, including
asphalt from oil change businesses, oil wax and wicks from train maintenance, and filters
from all types of industrial processes.
Overall, the roundtable participants agreed th;it quantifying debris volumes is
difficult because debris is often generated with soil or mixed with other contaminants and
separation is not usually possible. Furthermore, TSD facilities have historically classified
wastes according to waste code rather than by waste type (i.e., debris). Accordingly, the
quantity data on debris wastes are less precise than Jala for must other hazardous waste
streams.
7.1J.2 Sources of Hazardous Debris
The universe of hazardous debris can be divided into three primary sources: (1)
routinely generated debris, (2) demolition/construction debris, and (3) remediation debris.
Each of these sources has characteristics that affect the type, quantity, variety, and timing
of debris generation. Exhibits 7-1 through 7-3 depict the various sources of hazardous
debris and subsequent management options.
Routinely generated debris includes waste items that are generated regularly or
continuously from a given "source" or industrial activity. -Examples of routinely generated
debris include:
Filters;
• Off-spec manufactured items;
• Spent batteries;
• Lamps and electronic components; and
• Personal protective equipment (PPE).
Debris from demolition and construction activities are generated sporadically
because construction and demolition tend to be seasonal and non-continuous.
Furthermore, the quantities of debris generated vary from site to site. Debris resulting
from private party remedial actions that are relatively small in scale are included in the
demolition/construction category. The types of materials^ generated in this category
include:
• Concrete and metal construction materials;
• Geologic materials; and
• Durable manufacturing and process equipment.
Remediation debris are primarily generated through Superfund, State CERCLA,
;md RCRA corrective action activities. This source category is characterized by large
quantities of hazardous debris being generated from single locations over a potentially
long period of time.
o
CO
Is)
71
o
o
tn
tu
-------
. i
O
> 25if
c "B
?|l|
<» o
S-tn
P-8-ff
O
o
o
f H
1 I
S .3
2 .8
•s a
3 «
>
i 3 -S
S 1 1
I 3 §
-------
»^ j
5
.3
Q
Z
O
6
SS
oo
O
cu
w
S
H
5
3
i
O
P s
I?
•1
S^d
2fi L— «
a n a
sis
8-
ii
i
§1
?Ei
Wl
I
3 o
i i
" S S
a S 1
3 3 I
f I 5
i S s
I
*
O
CO
K)
71
o
o
un
in
-------
> .» »
•§SE
t— 4
CO
o
CU
00
V— 4
Q
2
§ fc
i O ^
' W [ij
^^"^ ^_^ ^^C
^
2
O
H
W
«
O
.
z
^1
1
SUBTITLE D
LANDFILL
1 M
•
axis-No
i
-~*
—
TREATMENT
a
^ * 3
gif
UJ
5
,
1
—
j
»
^ 5
r C
It
:
;
DISPOSAL*
4
i
L_
-
j
u
t
5
|
COMMERCIAL
SUBTITLE C i
u
i j
i
j i
•
TREATMENT
LANDFILL i
'
3
L .1
{ *
1 s
1
§
e
7 8
5 as
I I
3 E.
1 !
M i It
2 U >!
•ft- a
1 1 2
_ «i 5 . S J
- U is 5
J H ^ 5
2 ^ (J
I 1 - - i
£. S 5 5 v-s
1 1 1 a sS
g -2 c 1 ||
J3 ^ s ^ r.iS
§ 2 2 I ^J
C 1- H Z Sf
' H
1 ^2 T*
t *
O
3
K)
•n
i
o
o
-------
7-8
The quantity of debris generated through demolition/construction and remediation
related activities is estimated to exceed the amount (if routinely generated debris by up
to a factor of ten. Debris from large remedial actions tend 10 be managed on-site and
therefore do no: require off-site commercial treatment capacity. However, debris from
• demolition or construction and from routine operations ;irc usually sent off-site for
management and constitute the most important sources nf debris requiring commercial
off-site treatment. Exhibit 7-4 presents the relative volumes of hazardous debris
currently going to commercial landfills.
The volumes of debris that are generated also vary depending on (he region, the
time of year, and economic conditions. For example, more debris is generated in the
summer than in the winter due to increased construction activities. In aging industrial
areas, a greater quantity of debris is generated from the demolition of older plants,
whereas in other areas, a greater proportion of the generated debris may originate from
road construction or the cleanup of federal facilities. In many southern sites,
approximately 25 percent of the tonnage generated at remediation sites is reported to be
wood. Finally, in a depressed economy, industrial waste streams are reduced and plant
retrofitting is delayed or cancelled, resulting in smaller quantities of debris generated.
7.1 JJ Current Management of Hazardous Dchris
The management of hazardous debris is often made 'difficult because of material
size and because debris waste streams are often mixed with other contaminated wastes.
Management options currently employed include landfilling debris without treatment,
incineration, stabilization, and decontamination through washing and steaming. (Exhibits
7-1 through 7-3 show the variety of management options for each major debris source.)
Approximately 80 percent of the hazardous debris land disposed off-site is landfilled
without treatment. Data received by EPA indicate that, t>f the land-disposed hazardous
debris, approximately 90 percent is contaminated with metals, while the remaining 10
percent contain organics, and are often also contaminated with metals. "**
Participants in the roundtable meetings estimated that incineration is the
predominant treatment method employed far the hazardous debris that is now treated.
While stabilization of hazardous debris is also practiced, one constraint to stabilization is
the availability of sizing equipment required for pre- treatment. Also, debris
contaminated with asbestos is not usually stabilized because of the potential health risks
to workers.
A large proportion of hazardous debris could be managed using decontamination
processes. Many facilities and treaters are currently performing what they consider to be
* This estimate is skewed to»aidj debns eontanu3a:cd »".1 in^uma because ihe national capacity variance
graned in ihe Third Third rule 10 inorganic solids debris »» --. c!!c« .u the lime these data wtre collected.
Fimhermore, the impact of the relatively new TC rule a juw ^f.vunj: H> he reflected in the data available to EPA.
o SS-o
O
71
o
o
-------
EXHIBIT 7-4
Sources of Hazardous Debris
Received By Commercial Landfills
Construction/
Demolition Debris
Q
50%
Routinely
Generated
Debris
Remedial
Debris
20%
30%
Commercial Landfill
• §*8
i e 8
o
Ol
to
71
o
o
Oi
QQ
-------
7-10
/,
decontamination of materials cm-site, a process whereby the hazardous waste is separated
from the debris material, thereby decontaminating the debris material. Roundtable
participants argued that EPA needs to recognize these procedures. Commenters also
argued that if treatment permits were required for practices currently considered to be
decontamination, this would cause severe disruptions in treatment. EPA has taken these
comments into consideration in updating its treatment standards. Nevertheless, EPA
recognizes that the currently available RCRA permitted capacity (off-site) for many
extraction technologies is very limited.
7.1.4 Other Data Sources
In addition to the information sources described above, the Agency also used
other data sources in its analysis of required capacity. These data sources are described
below.
-*
n
«i
7.1.4.1 Envirosafe Data
The Envirosafe landfill facility in Ohio voluntarily submitted information on all the
waste streams it received in 1990. The data contain a description of each waste stream
including waste form and waste codes, as well as the volume received. According to this
data, the Envirosafe landfill received 47,000 torn of hazardous debris during 1990.47
Of this volume, 470 tons (approximately 1%) was contaminated with the newly identified
TC organic wastes (D018-D043). The remaining volume of debris was contaminated with
wastes that have been previously regulated under earlier LDR rules.
7.1.4.2 LaidlawData
o
oo
to
o
o
The Laidlaw landfill facility in South Carolina voluntarily submitted information on
all the soil and debris waste streams it received in 1991. The data contain a description
of each waste stream including waste form and waste codes, as well as the volume
received. According to this data, the Laidlaw landfill received 7,100 tons of hazardous
debris during 1991. Of this volume, 950 tons (13 percent) was contaminated with the
newly identified TC organic wastes (D018-D043). The remaining volume of debris was
contaminated with wastes that have been previously regulated under earlier LDR rules.
7.2 REQUIRED CAPACITY
EPA conducted the TC Survey specifically to address the effects of the LDRs on
waste streams containing newly identified TC organic wastes. The results of this survey
predict erratic generation of contaminated debris requiring off-site treatment between
" Some waste streams included IxnO soil and debra. Relief ifuri attempt 10 estimate the relative proportions of
soil and debris, the entire volume was assumed to be soil Therefore, f-a euimaie may unoenuic the tnie volume of
hazardous debris received at the facility.
un
uo
-------
7-11
1991 and 1995; this reflects ihe ways in which contaminated debris is generated. Some is
generated through spills and other routine causes, but some results from one-time events,
such as remediation efforts and surface impoundment closures. Exhibit 7-5 presents the
quantities of newly identified TC organic debris requiring off-site commercial treatment
capacity by waste code for 1993.
EPA is finalizing treatment standards for two other groups of newly-listed wastes
in this rule, coke by-product wastes (KI41-KU5 and K147-K148) and chlorinated
toluenes (K149-K151). Under the authority of section 3007 of RCRA, EPA collected
generation and management information concerning coke by-product wastes and
chlorinated toluenes. However, during these data collection efforts, EPA did not
investigate hazardous debris. Since EPA has not received information indicating that
there is hazardous debris contaminated with these wastes, the Agency assumes that there
will not be significant volumes of hazardous debris contaminated with coke by-products
and chlorinated toluenes.
73 CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR HAZARDOUS DEBRIS
EPA estimates that approximately 34,000 tons of debris contaminated with newly-
identified organic TC wastes are currently land disposed and require off-site commercial
treatment capacity. EPA believes this debris can be treated to meet LDR standards by
using combustion technologies. EPA has determined that there is adequate sludge/solid
combustion capacity to accommodate these wastes. Therefore, the Agency is not
granting a capacity variance for debris contaminated with newty listed and identified
wastes covered under this ruling.
EPA recognizes that generators of debris contaminated by wastes covered under
this rule may be faced with logistical issues in complying with the new regulations.
However, EPA has granted a three-month national capacity variance for all wastes
covered by this rule. The Agency believes that this is a reasonable time period for
addressing logistical issues related to compliance.
i,-
O
oo
to
71
o
o
-------
7-J2
EXHIBIT 7-S
QUANTmES OF NEWLY-IDENTIFIED TC ORGANIC DEBRIS BY SOURCE
O
Waste Code
DOIS
D019
D020
D021
D022
D023
D024
D025
D026
D027
D028
D029
D030
D031
D032
D033
D034
D035
D036
D037
D038
D039
D040
O041
D042
D043
Totals'
Tons of Surface Disposed Waste
26,400
220
20
210
80
60
60
60
700
290
280
330
90
10
70
110
40
300
70
130
570
970
890
20
20
1,700
34,000
* Toul may IMM SUB due to r
Source: TC Survey
»l
c &
n
71
o
o
Oi
en
-------
APPENDIX A
SAMPLE HWTC SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
o
C/3
K>
o
o
-------
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT COUNCIL J993 SURVEY
OF COMMERCIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATION CAPACITY
The Hazardous Waste Treatment Council (HWTC) is conducting a voluntary survey
of commercial incineration companies to determine their capacity to burn RCRA hazardous
wastes. The responses to this survey will be submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency's Office of Solid Waste. This information-will be lued in EPA's capacity analysis
for "newly identified* RCRA hazardous wastes. This capacity analysis is used to establish
the effective date of treatment standards under the Land Disposal Restrictions (LOR)
program. In the LDR process, standards are established for individual waste codes, based
on the performance of the Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BOAT) for the waste.
Once enacted by rule, these standards must be met before a waste may be disposed of on
the tsnd. EPA analyzes the availability of alternative treatment capacity when setting the
effective date at which BDAT standards must be met.
HWTC requested that EPA indicate what types of information EPA uses to
conduct the capacity analysis. This questionnaire incorporates the information provided by
EPA. It focuses on the types and quantities of hazardous wastes that are typically managed
in incinerator units. It requests information on current (as of March 1993) and planned
practices (anticipated before July 1994) liat affect hazardous waste capacity. EPA is
interested in future plans that affect capacity because the regulatory agenda for LDR rules
spans several years.
To arrive at accurate capacity estimates, EPA requires facility and unit-specific data.
Questions 7,8,9 acd 10 pertain to individual units. If a facility burns hazardous wastes in
more tbaa one unit, these questions should be completed for each thermal destruction unit.
A supplemental question set is included for additional units.
Submission of information requested in this questionnaire is voluntary. It is not an
EPA survey, nor is* it required under any EPA authority. Where possible, multiple choice
questions hive been provided to simplify responses. Separate pages may be used to provide
clarifying information or explain specific responses. Other materials, (e.g., company
brochures, permit applications, or trial burn report dm that provide the requested
information may be attached to your response. Any facility that wishes to have their
information submitted to EPA as Confidential Business Information (CBI) may do so by
marking specific information as CBI. Information that is available from publicly available
sources should not be marked as CBI.
We anticipate that completing this form may require information from marketing.
operations, and environmental personnel. Once source materials and inputs from various
individuals art-compiled, we expect completing the form to require two to three hours per
facility.
iff
O
(/>
to
o
O
an
UJ!
-------
«.•.!=-.]•
In. order to provide this information to EPA io time for the capacity analysis,
completed forms must be received by HWTC by MfL 14- 19?3- H you have general
questions regarding this data collection effort, please contact A.E. Lovett or Eli EiJbott at
the HWTC at 202-783-0870. If you have technical questions, please contact Gary Light of
ICF (SPA'S Capacity Analysis Contractor) at 703-934.3928. '
O
CO
to
71
O
O
-------
A. Facility Information
Iff
1. Respondent Name and Tide:
Company:
Phone number:
2. Name and address of company that owns the thermal destruction device at this
facility:
Facility name, location, and address:
o
a>
to
EPA ID of burner
o
o
EPA ID of on-iite proceisor (if different from above):
EPA ID of other on-sitc hazardous waste tramporten
martaeten
• storcn
Number of incinerator unia currently burning hazardous wastes at this facility:
Additional incinerator units opected to bum hazardous wastes by July 1994:
Incinerator unfa at this facility not expected to burn hazardous wastes by July 1994:
Total Number of incinerator units a: this facility (should be total of above):
•1-
en
LO
-------
4. Please indicate the fonn(s) in which you receive hazardous wastes by checking all
that apply:
Roll-Off Bin
End Dump Tracks
Hopper Trucks
Steel Drum, specify sizes: \
Poly Drum, Specify sizes: _
Fiber Drum, specify sizes:
Bag or other flexible container, specify sizes:
Rigid Tote
Tanker Trucks (transferred to tank)
Tanker Trucks (direct feed to incinerator)
Rai! car
C-.boy
Pallet
Gaylords
Hoppers
Compressed gases
Lab Packs
Other, specify: •
5a. Please indicate your current and planned qn-site and company owned off-site storage
capacity for hazardous wastes. Indicate any requested specifications below the table.
s!
o
i
O
O
Maximum RCRA Hazardous Waste Storage Capacity
Storage
Type
Containers
Liquid
Tanks
Contain-
ment Bldg
Bulk Solids
Waste Piles
Other
(specify)
Current Capacity
(gallons)
On-site
Off-site
Total
Planned Capacity
Additions
(gallons)
On-site
Off-site
Total
Expected Date for
Planned Additions
On-site
Off-site
Total
GHi
CD!
1
-------
5b. What processing operations do you perform oo-siie for liquid wastes?
F«
1
1
Process
Blending
Filtration
Decanting
Ceatrifugation
Other (spenfy)
Description
Incinerator Rate Limiting (Y or N)
Are any of these processes rate limiting to the totaJ iacineratioa process ? if so.
describe.
Sc. What processing operations do you perform on-site for solid wastes?
For each, please describe size and configuration limitations for waste feed materials. Also.
explain the throughput rate and any rate limiting steps. '
Process
Size Reduction
Grindjng
Shredding
Sorting
Repackaging
Other (specify)
Description
-
Size Limitations
..
Incinerator Rate Limiting
(YorN)
1 For purposes of tail form, 'processing" includes all blending, repackaging, or other physical
processing required to prepare the waste to be fed to the incinerator unit Attach Part B
application pages or other narrative description if it is helpful.
o
71
o
o
on
-------
6. Please complete the Mowing table indicating this facility's capacity to receive and process
wastes on-rite priorto buminf. Maximum practical processing capacity estimates should
be based on the most limiting technical or permitting constraint oa receiving, storage, and
processing operations that occur in sequence. Please estimate maximum practical
processing in terms of waste quantities as received. In the "Limiting Factor" column.
indicate whether the limit is a permit limit (P), another regulatory limit (R), or some other
technical limit (I). If regulatory limits contain overall facility capacity below the sum of
individual incinerator unit capacity limits, please distribute the facility capacity limit such
that individual incinerator unit limits do not exceed total facility limits.
\
T
;
f;
•I
3
On-site Hazardous Waste Receiving and Processing Capacity
Waste Type
Liquids
(aqueous)
Liquids
(non-aqueous)
Pumpible
Sludges
Nonpumpable
Sludges-
Containerized
Solids
Bulk Solids
Compressed -
Gases
Total
Tons Received
During 1992
.
.-
Tons Processed
During 1992
•
•
Current Maximum
Practical Processing
Capacity
(toat/yr u received)
Capacity
Limiting
Factor
•
II
o
o
o
-4-
-------
Unit Number
of
Questions 7,8,9 and 10 should be completed for each incinerator unit currentlyj»uming hazar^m
waste or that you Qg&£LtQJ2UIXI hazardous waste by July, 1994. A .-upplementaj question is
inducted for additional units.
7. Unit Number.
Tjpe of incineration unic
Thermal input (Bm/hour):
Total hours operating per year on average:
Type(s) of hazardous waste feed sywem(s) currently used with this kiln:
fumpablc liquict tnjeaed:
Bulk solids Injected;
Containerized solids charged
Sludge Pump:
Non-Pumpabtc Sludge feed:
Compressed gases: ; ._
Other (specify)
-
M!
*•! f* t--
o
oo
to
•n
i
o
o
U
on
uo
-------
Oi
g.
?|ease indicate the amount of hazardous wastes you actually buraed in this kiin during 1592
and the maximum practical amount you could burn in one year, taJaag into account
operational down time, residual management capacity limits, Interim Status, and permit
limit*. In the 'Capacity Limiting Factor" coluein. indicate whether it is a permit lirru IP}.
another type of regulatory limit (R), a beat release limit (H) or some other technical Icni
(T). If permits limit overall facility capacity and not icdividuaJ incinerator capacity, please
make sure that the sum of individual thermal destruction unit capacities does not exceed
overall facility limits. Explain any exceptions on a separate page as necessary. (Total
capacity may norrqual the sum of the waste specific capacities if there is a permit limit OB
total capacity, or if one form of waste capacity may be traded off for another.)
. Kiln Number
Liquids
(aqueous)
Liquids
(con-aqueous)
Pumpable
Sludges
Noopumpable
Sludges
Containerized
Solids
Bulk Solids
Compressed
gases
Total
Tons of Hfyrdouf
Waste Burned During
1992
•'
Total toos of
Waste Burned
during 1992
-
Maximum
Current Practical
Burning Capacity
(Tons/Year)
Capacity
Limiting
Factor
3 S01
.50
o
oo
i
O
O
8a. EPA is rwsfc that hazardous wastes thit are teperated »s solids are often blended is to
liquids for injection to the incinerator ucit. What is the average solid content in the liquids
fed to this unit (on a tonnage basis), and what fraction of the solids entrained in these
liquids were originally generated as solids.
Average total solid content in liquids (a burned):
Percent of above solids originally generated as lolids:
-6-
(%)
—V
CD:
-------
Unii Number of
9. Please indicate the values you assumed for each of the following factors in estimating th<
hazardous waste burning capacity of each incinerator unit Fill in those that do not appl
with N/A.
Waste Type
Liquids
(aqueous)
Liquids
(non-aqueous)
Pumpable
Sludges
Nonpumpable
Sludges
Containerized
Solids
Bulk Soli*
Compressed
gases
Average Haz.
Waste Feed
Rate (Ib/hr)
Average Ifliat
Waste Feed
Rate (Ibs/hr)
•
Days Feeding
Haz. Waste per
Year(davs/yr)
•
Average Heating
Value of Haz.*
Waste (Btu/lb)
•
(
» 5
O
C/3
to
71
o
O
Please list any other critical parameter! on which capacity estimates are based and include
additional operating assumptions that further clarify your capacity estimate for this incineratior
unit.
-7-
—I
-------
Unit Number
of
10. If thh unit is not currently burning hazardous wastes (as of March 1993), please indicate
when you expect it to begin burning hazardous waste, and any physical changes or regulatory
(eg, permit or Interim Suns) modification that must occur and or be authorized before
this bin will begin burning hazardous wastes.
lOa) When (year and month or quarter):
:» III
lOb) Physical changes (include planned schedule):
8 sr
iM
o
lOe) Regulatory modifications (include planned schedule):
71
o
o
-8-
-------
i
Please fill in the following table for aJl authorizations you are seeking in order to burn RCRA
hazardous wastes. Consider all permits that limit your ability to burn hazardous wastes. Also
indicate when you expect final authorizations. Please use the following permit status codes
in the current status column:
NR- Pennh Mot Required (explain in notej
FP - fully permitted to receive RCRA hazardous wastes
PM • Preparing Permit Modification for Additional Wastes
SA - Submitted Complete Application and Awaiting Response from Issuing Agency
MA - Modifying Permit Application for Additional RCRA Wastes
IS - Interim Status
ND - Currently Responding to fcjotkes of Deficiency in Application
PH- Awaiting £ubue Hearing on Permit
OT- Other (please specify):
I
Authorization Required
Federal
Blf
RCRA Storage
RCRA Treatment
dean Air Act
Other (specify)
State
Hazardous Waste
Air Emission
Land Use/Siting
Other (specify)
lineal
Hazardous Waste
Air Emission
Land Use/SUag
Other (specify) -
Authorizing Agency Name •
and Phone Number
„
*
Current
Status
Expected Date
of Authorization.
• •
o
O
O
-------
lla. Please indicate the acceptable ranges of all physical and chemical waste properties that you
consider before agreeing to receive a waste. Fill in only those that apply, and add properties
as necessary. In the "Limiting Factor* column, indicate whether the limit is a permit limit (P).
another regulatory limit (R). or some other technical limit (1). If you have a total specified
metals limit and not individual metal limits, indicate the total specified metals limit and check
off which metals are included in this limit. Explain any exceptions on a' separate-sheet as
necessary. _
"As Received" Liquid Aqueous Waste Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Particle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other (Specify)
Other (Specify)
Total Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Othen Specify
Othen Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
-
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
-
i * s" w
o
o
o
•10-
—I
-------
Property
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Concent
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Concent
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
:>clenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
7Jnc Content
Other Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
•"
•-
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
-
Limiting
Factor
??5
> ^§ *
S M
O
o
O
—i
un
-------
lib. Are your liquid waste limitations 'as burned* the same as waste limitations 'as received"?
(Y/N)
If yes, skip to 12a, If no, please indicate the limitations on ail physical and chemical waste
properties as burned. Fill in only those that apply, and add properties as necessary- In the
•Limiting Factor* column, indicate whether the limit is a permit limi: (P), another regulatory
limit (R), a heat release limit (H) or some other technical limit (T). If you have a total
• specified metals limit and not individual metal limits, indicate the total specified metals limit
and check off which metals are included in this limit. Explain any exceptions on a separate
sheet as necessary.
'As Burned* Liquid Aqueous Waste Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Particle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other Specify
Other: Specify
Total Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Other Specify "'
Other. Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
*
Maximum -
Allowable
(specify units)
.
*
Limiting
Factor ,
O
en
to
>n
o
o
•12-
cn
-------
Property
Totaj Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other: Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
.
Limiting
Factor
ft *
n
71
o
o
•13-
-------
I2a. Please indicate the acceptable ranges of all physical and chemical waste properties that you
consider before agreeing to receive a waste. Fill in only those that apply, and add properties
as necessary. In the 'Limiting Factor* column, indicate whether the limit is a permit limit (P).
another regulatory limit (R), or some other technical limit (T). If you have a total specified
i.-.etaJs limit and not individual meuJ limits, indicate the total specified metals limit and check
off which metals are included in this limit Explain any exceptions on a separate sheet as
off which
necessary.
*As Received" Liquid Non-Aqueous Waste Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
TotaJ Inorganics Content
Particle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other (Specify)
Other (Specify)
Tool Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Other: Specify
Other Specify- "
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
/
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
""
Limiting
Factor
«r ™
O
00
O
O
-14-
co
-------
•As Receiver Liquid Non*Aqueoui Waste Limitations
Property
Total Specified MetaJs Content
Antimony Content
Anenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Memuy Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium "Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
*
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
•"
H
O
71
o
o
-15-
-------
Liquid Non-Aqueous Waste Acceptance Limits As Burned
I2b. Are your liquid waste limitations "as burned* the same 3$ waste limitations 'as received"*
(Y/N)
If yes, skip to !3au If no, please indicate the limitations on all physical and chemical waste
properties as burned. Fill in only those (hat apply, and add properties as necessary. In (he
•Limiting Factor- column, indicate whether the limit is a permit limit (P), another regulatory
limit (R), a heat release limit (H) or some other technical limit (T). If you have a total
specified metals limit and not individual metal limits, indicate the total specified metals limit
and check off which metals are included in this limit. Explain any exceptions on a separate
sheet as necessary. ^^
*As BurnecT Liquid Non-Aqueous Waste Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Particle/Object She
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Othen Specify
Other: Specify
Total Halogen Content .
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content '
Bromine Content
Other Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
4
Maximum
AJIowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
•
o
O9
10
o
o
•16-
Oj
COS
J
-------
•As Bunted* Liquid Non-Aqueous Waste Limitations
Property
Total Specified Metats Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Othen Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
t
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
Limiting •
Factor
-
m
V _ a
Sg-S
O
o
o
-17-
Oi
CD
-------
Ua.
Pumpabte Sludges Waste Acceptance Limits As Received
An your pumpable sludge waste limitations 'as received" (he same as waste limitations
specified in questions 12a or b? If so, specify which table applies (e*. 12a or 12b) and skip
to 13b:
If no. please indicate the acceptable ranges of all physical and chemical waste properties that
you consider before agreeing to receive a waste. Fill in only those that apply, and add
properties as necessary. In the "Limiting Factor* column, indicate whether the limit is a
permit limit (P), another regulatory limit (R), or some other technical limit (T). If you have
a total specified meals limit and not individual metal limits, indicate the total specified
metals limit and check off which metals are included in this limit. Explain any exceptions on
a "FT*""* sheet as necessary.
SSS
s
Is"
"As Received* Puinpable Sludfes Waste Limitations
Propei ly
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solkh Content
Total Inorganics Content
Panicle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other Specify
Other. Specify
Total Halogen Content
Chlorine Content . .
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Other Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
Limiting
Factor
o
>
10
"rt
i
O
O
-18-
CQ
ru
i
-------
•As Received* Pumptble Sludfes Waste Limitations
Property
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Cooper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Ifickel Content
!>eteniuffl Content
Silver Content
'.rhallium Content .
Vanadium Content
21inc Content
Other Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify unto)
•
•
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
Limiting .
Factor
-19-
5S 0-Z
o 8 So
fili
?•§•*»
I
o
00
to
o
g
03
Uj
-------
Pumpable Sludges Waste Acceptance Umlts As Burned
13b. Are your pumpabfe sludge waste limitations "as burned* the same as waste limitations
specified in earlier questions? if so, specify which table applies (e£, 12b) and skip to Ua:
If no, please indicate the limitations on all physical and chemical waste properties as burned.
Fill in only those that apply, and add properties as necessary. In the 'Limiting Factor*
column, indicate whether the limit is a permit limit (P), another regulatory limit (R), a heat
release limit (H) or some other technical limit (T). If you have a total specified metals limit
and not individual metal limits, indicate the total specified meals limit and check off which
metals are included In this limit Explain any exceptions on a separate sheet as necessary.
> ?If
•As Burned* Pompabte Studces Waste Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Particle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other: Specify
Other Specify
Total Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content- ••
Bromine Content
Other Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify unto)
„•
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
-
Limiting
Factor
,
•
a » *
If!-
o
00
to
71
o
o
-20-
CO
.J
-------
"As Burned" Punpable Sludges Waste Limitations
Property
Total Specified Metals Qmtent
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Stiver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other Specify
Other. Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify unit)
4
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
o
C/3
K>
71
o
o
-21-
Oj
C30
!
un
-------
14a,
Nonpuznpable Sludges Waste Acceptance Limits As Received
Are jour nonpumpable sludge waste limitations 'as receiver the same as waste limitations
specified in earlier questions? If so. specify which table applies (eg, 12a) and skip to 14b:
If no, please indicate the acceptable ranges or attphysical and chemical waste properties that
you consider before agreeing to receive a waste. Fill in only those that apply, and add
properties as necessary. In the "Limiting Factor* column, indicate whether the limit is a
permit limit (P), another regulatory limit (R), or some other technical limit (T). If you have
a total specified metals limit and not individual metal limits, indicate the total specified
metals limit and check off which metals are included in this limit Explain any exceptions on
a separate sheet as necessary.
'As Received" Noapumpable Sludfes Waste Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
total Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Particle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other Specify
Other Specify
Total Halogen Content
Chlorine Content . .
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Other: Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
-
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
*
1
•a o Sg o
68*3
o
to
71
1 o
o
ru!
COi
on
-22-
t
-------
'As Received' Nonpunpable Sludges Waste Limitations
Property
Total Specified Meals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Contest
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
' Selenium Content
Sliver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
3then Specify
Othen Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
Manmura
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
•
? - •*
•§5g
;?" w
0.0.
ss
O
c/a
to
O
O
nj
CQ
—i
-23-
-------
Noopumpabie Sludges Waste Acceptance Limits As Burned
14b. Arc your nonpumpabte sludge waste limitations 'as burned" the same as waste [imitations
specified in earlier questions? If so. specify which table applies (e^, 125) and skip to 15a:
If no, please indicate the limitations on all physical and chemical waste properties as burned.
Fill in only those that apply, and add properties as necessary. In the 'Limiting Factor*
column, indicate whether the limit is a permit limit (P), another regulatory limit (R), a neat
release limit (H>t>rsome other technical limit (T). IF you have a tool specified metals limit
and not individual metal limits, indicate the total specified metals limit and check off which
metals are included in this limit. Explain any exceptions on a separate sheet as necessary.
*As Burned* Nonpumpable Sludges Waste Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Total inorganics Content
Panicle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other Specify
Other Specify
Total Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content ~
Bromine Content
Other Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
,
* P
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
o
TJ
O
O
-24-
CO
CQ
-------
"As Burned" Noopumpable Sludges Waste Limitations
Piupcrty
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other: Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
*
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
'
Limiting
Factor
*zs
\ ?§»
? n O
3 « —
*r u. M
e O-
o
71
o
o
-25-
CO
uo
-------
Containerized Solids Waste Acceptance Limits As Received
ISa. Are your containerized solids waste limitations *as received* the same as waste limitations
specified in earlier questions? If so, specify which table applies (tg, 12a) and skip to I5b:
If no. please indicate the acceptable ranges of all physical and chemical waste properties that
you consider before agreeing to receive a waste. Fill in only those that apply, and add
properties as necessary. In the 'Limiting Factor* column, indicate whether the limit is a
permit limit (P), another regulatory limit (R). or some other technical limit (T). If you have
a total specified metals limit and not individual metal limits, indicate die total specified
metals limit and check off which metals are included in this limit. Explain any exceptions on
a separate sheet as necessary.
iHl
37 A 1
A *** I
n " *» *. I
O.O.JT »
• O <" •-
•As Received* Containerized Solids Waste Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Panicle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other Specify
Other. Specify
Total Halogen Content*
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Other Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
{specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
*
Limiting
Factor
o
CO
to
^n-
o
o
-26-
UQ
-------
f
•As Received" Cantaiaeriztd Solids Waste Limitations
Property
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content "
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
1 Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Stiver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Othen Specify
Othen Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
/
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
*!?
»ig|
g-«< 55 &z
ji _ o ** >^
rt " '
a o..
°s
o
oo
to
o
o
•27-
LO
-------
Containerized Solids Waste Acceptance limits As Burned
ISb. Are your containerized solids waste limitations 'as burned" the same as waste limitations
specified in earlier questions? If so, specify which table applies (eg-, 13b) and skip to 16a:
If no, please indicate the limitations on all physical and chemical waste properties as burned.
Fill in only those that apply, and add properties as necessary. In the "Limiting Factor
column, indicate whether the limit ts a permit limit (P), another regulatory limit (R), a heat
release limit (H) or some other technical limit (T). If you have a total specified metals limit
and not individual metal limits, indicate the total specified metals limit and check off which
metals are included in this limit. Explain any exceptions on a separate sheet as necessary.
, .... tn
•
"As Burned* Containerized Solids Waste Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Particle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Othen Specify
Other: Specify
Total Halogen <"v*"»«t
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Conceit
Bromine Content
Other Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
i
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
•
O
co
K)
71
0
O
•23-
-------
*As Burned* Containerized Solids Waste Limitations
Property
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
1 Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other: Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
O
00
K)
71
O
O
-29-
u
uu
* : Eli
-------
Bulk Solids Waste Acceptance Units AJ Received
16a. Are your bulk solids waste limitations 'as received* the same as waste limitations specified
in earlier questions? If so, specify which table applies (e>g, 12a) and skip to 16b:
If no, please indicate the acceptable ranges of all physical and chemical waste properties that
you consider before agreeing to receive a waste, Fill -in only those that apply, and add
properties as necessary. In the "Limiting Factor* column, indicate whether the limit is a
permit limit (P), another regulatory limit (R), or some other technical limit (T). If you have
a total specified meals limit and not individual metal limits, indicate the total specified
metals limit and check off which metals are included in this limit. Explain any exceptions on
a separate sheet as necessary.
a ? "<»
«
•As Received* Bulk Solids Waste Limitations •
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Tool Inorganics Content
Particle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other Specify
Other Specify
Total Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content '"
Bromine Content
Other Specify
Othen Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
*
•
Maximum
Allowable
(specify unisj
Limiting
Factor
o
C/3
to
71
o
o
-pi.
-30-
-C!
-------
•41
•As Receiver Bulk Solids Waste Limitations
Property
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Sliver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other Specify
Other Spedfy
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
•.
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
Is
o
C/3
K)
71
o
o
-31-
uo
tn
-------
Bulk Solids Waste Acceptance Limits As Burned
16b. Are your bulk solids waste limitations 'as burned" the same as wane limitations specified in
earlier questions? If so, specify which table applies (tg* 13b) and skip to 17a:
If no, please indicate the limitations on all physical and chemicaJ waste properties as burned.
Fill in only those that apply, and add properties as necessary. In the "Limiting Factor
column, indicate whether the limit is a permit limit (P), another regulatory limit (R), a heat
release limit (H) or some other technical limit (T). If you have a total specified metals limit
and not individual metaJ limits, indicate the total specified metals limit and check off which
metals are included in this limit. • Explain any exceptions on a separate sheet as necessary.
.*
•As Burned* Bulk Solids Waste Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Particle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium'Content
Other: Specify
Other Specify
Total Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Other: Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
;
•
"
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
o
3
to
71
o
o
•32-
"U
cn
-------
"As Burned" Bulk Solids Waste Limitations
Piu|jcjiy
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Anenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
.,
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
,61
«5"g.
=•< ?aS!
Q.&
-."
o
oo
to
71
o
o
-33-
UQ
i
-------
Compressed Gas Waste Acceptance Ltmlti AJ Received
17a. Please indicate the acceptable ranges of all physical and chemical waste properties that you
consider before agreeing to receive compressed gas waste. Fill in only those that apply, and
add properties as necessary. In the "Limiting Factor* column, indicate whether the limit is
a permit limit (P). another regulatory limit (R^or some other technical limit (T). If you
have a total specified metals limit and not individual metal limits, indicate the total specified
metals limit and check off which metals are Included in this limit. Explain any exceptions on
a separate sheet as necessary.
•As Received* Compressed Gas Waste Limitations
Piopcfty
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Inorganics Content
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other Specify
Other Specify
Total Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Other Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
•
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
S"
O
a>
to
o
o
CQ
-------
•As Received" Compressed Cu Wane Limitations
Property
Tool Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Concent
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
• Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zone Content
Ottten Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
AJtowablc
(specify units)
..
.
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
-
Limiting
Factor
•
g«
a a i
. o " —
o
71
o
o
-35-
UD
-------
Compressed Gas Waste Acceptance Limits As Burned
ITb. Are jour compressed gas waste limitations 'as burned" the same as waste limitations specified
in earlier questions? If so, specify which table applies (eg, 17a) and skip to 18:
If no, please indicate the limitations on all physical and chemical waste properties as burned
Fill in only those that apply, and add properties as necessary. In the limiting Factor*
column, indicate whether the limit b a permit limit (P), another regulatory limit (R). a heat
release limit (H) or some other technical limit (T). If you have a total specified metals limit
and not individuaTmetal limits, indicate the total specified metals limit and check off which
metals are included in this limit. Explain any exceptions on a separate sheet as necessary.
"As Burned* Compressed Gu Waste Umiutions
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Inorganics Content
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other: Specify
Othen Specify
Total Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Other Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
•
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
O
(/)
Is)
71
o
O
-36-
CD
-------
'As Burned" Compressed Gas Waste Limitations
Property
Total Specified Metafs Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content -
Other Specify
Othen Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
,
.
-
Limiting
Factor
5
o
00
to
(-n
o
o
-37-
UJ
-------
CVDCS 01
contaminated debns at this facility, and any physical or chemicaj conditions t*
restrictions or limitations) in addition to ihnv tperified above which would be required for
you to do so. Note any important acceptance conditions io the table and explain them on the
page following the table. If one of the types of debris may be included in wastes you receive.
but you are uncertain, please check off the 'Don't Know* column:
Hnsrd0u Vittu OnwnUniUd DcMs Acecptiaec
TjpcofDdufe
Common Clotfi M*ieriil» (cj, rajs, mop
heads, blankets, or dodiinc)
Penocul Pnteedoo Exjuipmeni (&(. Tyvoc
AbS)
Paper or CarAxxril Materials
FdierCanridtes
WoodMaterUs
Rubber Objeeo (tf. (ires, hoses)
PVCP|K
Other Plasdc Debris
Class Debris
Ceramic Debrb (e«. semiooodueion)
Meal Objecis (e«, pipes, vtlves. pumm. oua
wdbolB)
Asbestos Materials (e*, ihiiujJes. tasulitioo)
Non-Soa Oeotojie Material (e*, rocks)
-oncncte Debris
Refnoory Brick
Other Brida
SU|
jmct BaRerics
Battery Cases
EJeoroofc Compooeia (64, printed drcuit
boards)
Electrical Wires. Swttdtes. etc.
Other
Accept
Now
OT/N)
;
Plan B> Accept
Dy June 94
fY/N)
,
_
.
Aecepance
Cofldidons
(to addition to abow)
Don't
Know
{/)
^ '
"
*
o
O
71
o
o
•38-
Ujj
CD!
ru
-------
19. Please explain uy debra aceqxancc oondidons noted on the previous page
: s-JS
1 s-l
S v E
*
"1.
4
19a. Do you accept soils? If jo, under what conditions or limitations?
O
o
O
-39-
.sa
CD
uu
-------
Permit Conditions
20. Please listall JOU waste codes you are oimmbf authorized to receive and burn
as of March 1993 fre, you have received full permit or interim sums approval
Attach a separate sheet as necessary. w
512
;*!
zo-z
*t*s
2£ w
;pVi
• ^;i
'•X
"J
I
8 "
21. Pte»e list all additional RCRA waste codes you are seeking permit or interim status
modifications to receive and bum. When do you expect authorization wburn thfe
waste?
O
oo
to
o
o
22.
Are you authorized to receive and burn 'newly identified" wastes F037, FQ38, F039,
FQ32, F034, F035, K1414CI45, K147-K151 or D018-D043? If not, what would you
have to do to be authorized for those codes?
-40-
UJ
-------
23.
Please fill in the following table for all authorizations you require in order to burn
RCRA hazardous wanes. Consider all permits trot limit your ability to burn
hazardous wastes. Please use the following permit status codes in the current status
column:
NR • Permit Hot Required (explain in note)
FP - E«Hy Eermined to receive RCRA hazardous -wastes
PM • Ereparing Permit Modification for Additional Wastes
SA - Submitted Complete Application and Awaiting Response from Issuing Agency
MA - Codifying Permit Application for Additional RCRA Wastes
IS - Interim Status
ND • Currently Responding to tJocices of Deficiency in Application
PH - Awaiting Eublic Hearing on Permit
OT- Other (please specify): _
£ "P
rM!
i^:.«
Authorization Required
Efi&caj
BIF
RCRA Storage
RCRA Treatment
Clean Air Act
Other (specify)
Sfatq
Hazardous Waste
Air Emission
Land Use/Siting
Other (specify)
L&ai
Hazardous Wtste
AirErawkxi
' Land Use/Siting
Other (speclry)
Authorizing Agency Name
and Phane Number
_.
•'
Current
Status
o
C/D
tx)
71
o
o
U1!
-------
r
""i
24.
ni
baarfow **« is a: proem or to begin burning hazardous wise in any ofiheunta
included in this form. Abo indteue *fco you «pea the du^« to be m«t ^^5
when UK) bow }ou would haw to change jour curant practices If these dutun are
not approved.
II!
O
C/3
to
71
O
O
-------
25.
"*
thi,
Yes
No
26.
[f you do plan to make changes to this facility, please describe the nature of cad]
modification (including incinerator unit number for specific changes), when you
expect it to be completed and fully operational, and the effect it will have on this
facility's hazardous waste capacity. Include modifications to waste receiving facilities,
fuel processing systems, waste feed systems, analytical equipment and facilities, and
air pollution control devices. You may attach appropriate sections of jour permit'
modification application that describe these changes if convenient
a) When (month or quarter, and year):
iQ-o s a °
**" n a •*
caSS "
a -* A **
I «» P" M
b) Effect on hazardous waste capacity:
o
c/)
to
71-
o
o
c) Modifications:
n
-43-
Q
J
-------
1
I Hi
II
SB °-x
a S-Q
s <*
Q.O.trS"
• 8 rr
2 0-8
9 C •
i »
O
O
APPENDIX B
SAMPLE CKRC SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
O
T1
o
g
-------
ns«s
a a. •- t»
1
4
CEMENT KILN RECYCLING COALITION 1993 SURVEY
OF CEMENT KILN HAZARDOUS WASTE CAPACITY
JVLY
O
O
O
Completed forms must be received by CKRC at the following address by July 23. 1993:
Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition
1212 New York Avenue, N.W.
Suite 500
Washington, D.C. :0005
Ann: Craig Campbell
ULJ
CD
UQ
-------
CEMENT KILN RECYCLING COALITION 1993 SURVEY
OF CEMENT KILN BAZARJDOL'S WASTE CAPACITY
The Cement Kiln Recycling Coaliucn (CKRO is conducting a voluntary survev i>t
cement companies to determine their capacity 10 burn RCRA hazardous wastes, the
responses to ihis survey will be submitted ic the L'.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
Office of Solid Waste. This information will be used in EPA's capaciry analysis tor" n«wl\
identified" RCRA hazardous wastes. This capacity analysis is used to establish the eirccme
date of treatment standards under the Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) program. In the
LDR process, standards are established for individual waste codes, based on the
performance of the Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BOAT) for the waste. Once
enacted by rule, these standards must be met before a waste may be disposed of on the
land. EPA analyzes the availability of alternative treatment capaciry when setting the
effective date at which BOAT standards must be met.
CKRC requested that EPA indicate what' types of information EPA uses to conduct
the capacity analysis. This questionnaire incorporates the information provided by EPA.
It focuses on the types and quantities of hazardous wastes that cement kilns are authorized
and technically able to bum. It requests information on current (as of July 23. 1993) and
planned practices (anticipated before July !994) that affect hazardous waste capaciry. EPA
is interested in future plans that affect capacity because the regulatory agenda for LOR rules
spans several yean. EPA is particularly interested in the effects of Clean Air Act (CAA)
. permits, and the Boiler and Industrial Furnace (BfF) Rule (Federal Register Volume 56
Number 35, February 21, 1991) on cement bin capaciry for hazardous wastes.
To arrive at accurate capacity estimates. EPA requires facility and unit-specific data.
Questions 8.9.10.11. and 12 pertain to individual kilns. If a facility bums hazardous wastes
in more than one kiln, these questions should be completed for each kiln. A supplemental
question set is included for additional kilns.
Submission of information requested in this questionnaire is voluntary. It is not an
EPA survey, nor is it required under any EPA authority. Where possible, multiple choice
questions have been provided to simplify responses. Separate pages may be used to provide
clarifying information or explain specific responses. Other materials (e.g., company
brochures, permit applications, or BIF precompliance certification forms) that provide the
requested information may be attached to your response. Any facility that wishes to have
their information submitted to EPA as Confidential Business Information (CBI) may do so
by marking specific information as CBI. Information that is available from publicly available
sources should not be_marked as CBI.
We anticipate that completing this form may require information from marketing.
operations, and environmental personnel. Once source materials and inputs from various
individuals are compiled, we expect completing ihe form to require two 10 ihree hours per
facility.
Hf
" 3 *
0.0..- w
.<><*«-
O
oo
to
>TJ
O
o
-------
In order to provide this information to EPA in ume for the capacity ar.aivsis
completed forms must be received by CKRC by Iulv^23. 1993. If you have eenerai questions
regarding this data collection effort, please contact Craig Campbell at the CKRC at :o:-'S
-------
•'«!
;!
A. Facility lofornutioa
I. Respondent Name and Title:
Company:
Phone number:
2. Name and address or company that owns (he cement kilns at this facility:
Facility name, location, and address:
EPA ID of burner:
Name of the company who manages the hazardous waste fuel program at this facility
(if not the cement company):
o
GO
to
1
EPA ID of on-site processor
EPA (D of other on-site hazardous waste transporter:
marketer:
storer:
Number of loins currently burning hazardous wastes at this facility:
Additional kilns"expected to bum hazardous wastes by July 1994:
Kilns at this facility not expected to burn hazardous wastes by Juty 1994:
Total Number.of kilns at this facility (should be total of above):
-I-
•"6
-------
4.
Please provide the name, location. ind phone number or the erf-sue interme_';j:
processor« (excluding onainal gene;a:orsi who provide ihe largest amount ot w
you receive, [n the 'Waste Type :oiurnn. pleaie use the following waste n
nr:
, . nr:
Liquids. Pumpable Sl-dges. Nonpumpatle Sludge*. Containcnred Solids. Bulk Shims
and Dry Soiids'.
Off-Site Processor*
Processor S'ame
Location
Phone Number
' 1 ' J
Waste Tvue Receiwu !
•
1 i
i
a o %• 3 o
c. a *7 w
. o *" •—
O
oo
to
o
o
lThroughout this survey, dry solids are soi.ds that, like coal dust, can be conveyed
pneumatically.
-------
B.
5.
Potential Capacity and Waste Acceptance Limitatio.ns
Please indicate the form(s) in which you receive hazardous wastes by checkine all that
apply:
Roll-Off Bin
Steel Drum, specify sacs:
Poly Drum, specify sizes:
Fiber Drum, specify sizes:_
Sun
Bag or other flexible container, specify sues:_
Rigid Tote
Tanker Trucks (transferred 10 tank)
Tanker Trucks (direct feed to kiln)
__t Rail car .
Carboy
Pallet
Other, specify:
3g
Please indicate your current and planned on-site storage capacity for hazardous
wastes. Indicate any requested specifications below the table.
n
71
o
o
Maximum RCRA Hazardous Waste Storage Capacity
Storage
Type
<•
Containers
Liquid
Tanks
Bulk Solids
Other
(specify)
Current Capacity
(Specify Units)
fc
Planned Capacity
Additions
(Specify Units)
•
Expected Date for
Planned Additions
ULJ
-------
?a. Please complete the fc '-wing table indicating the quantity ot waste recent :.
71
o
UJ
I
J
-------
7b. What processing operations do you perform on-site for wastes'- In the 'W3»ie
Type" column, please use the following wasie rypes: Liquids. Pumpable Slud«».
Nonpumpable Sludges. Containenzed Solids. Bulk Solids, and Dry Solids. In 'the
"Capacity" column. EPA is especially interested in knowing if the capacity tor the
processing system is less than the overall unit capacity for rypes of waste processed.
In (he "Limiting Factor" column, indicate whether the- limit is a permit limit |P).
another regulatory limit (R). or some technical limit (T). Use more than one copy
or this table for the different waste rypes processed.
On-site Hazardous Waste Processing Capacity
Process
Blending
Filtration
Decanting
Centrifugation
Size Reduction
Grinding
Shredding
Sorting
Repackaging
Other (Specify)
Waste Type(s)
Processed
.
Annual
Capacity
/
Size/Material
Limitations
.
.
Capacity
Limiting Factor
.
m
?•§•*"
g-3
o
O
O
Are any of these processes rate limiting to the total thermal destruction process
If so. describe.
2 For purposes of this form, "processing1 includes all blending, repackaging, or other
physical processing required to prepare the waste to be fed to the kiln.
on
-------
Kjln Number
Questions 8. 9. 10. 1 1 and 12 should be completed for each kiln currently burning
waste or that you expect to burn hazardous wane by July. 1994. A supplemental question
set is deluded for additional kilns. (Question 12 focuses on loins thai are not burmne a» >>t
Julv 23. 1993).
US
8.
Kiln Number:
Type of Kiln:
Ginker capacity (tons/lir):
Thermal input (Btu/ton clinker):
Type of cement product(s) produced in this kiln:
Total hours operating per year on average:
Type(s) of hazardous waste feed systems) currently used with this kiln:
Pumpable liquids injected at "hot" end:
Dry solids injected at "hot" end:
Containerized solids charged to calcining zone:
Sludge Pump:
Other, (specify)
o
00
o
o
Please describe the sludge and solid feed systems indicated above (e.g.. containers are
conveyed to a platform where they are manually placed into a gravity teed chute
connected to the kiln).
Uj
-------
Kilo Number:
9. Please indicate the amount of hazardous wastes you actually burned m ;hi$ kiln
during 1992. and the maximum practical amount you could burn in one vear ukinu
into account operational down time, residual management capacity limits interim
Status precompliance limits, and permit limits. In the "Capacity Limiting Facior
column, indicate whether it is a permit limit (P). another' type of regulatory limit f'Rl
a product quality limit (Q). or some other technical limit
-------
Kiln Number;
10. Please indicate (he values you assumed for each of ine following factors in estimating
the hazardous waste burning capacity of each kiln. Fill in those that do not jppiy
withX/A.
Wasie Type
LJ quids
Pumpable
Sludges
Nonpumpable
Sludges
Containerized
Solids
Bulk Solids
Dry Solids
Average
Haz. Waste
Feed Rate
(Ib/hr)
Daily Hours
of Operation
Feeding
Haz. Waste
(hr/day)
Days
Feeding Haz.
Wane per
Year
(days/yr)
•
Average
Heating
Value of
Haz. Waste
(Btalb)
Percent of
Fuel Value
provided by
Haz. Wastes
(Biu basis)
* **
O
GO
K>
71
O
O
Please list any other critical parameters on which capacity estimates are based and include
additional operating assumptions that further clarify your capacity estimate for this kiln:
-------
Kiln Number:
11.
When (e.g.. calendar month) and for how long is (his bin usually shut down
scheduled maintenance?
SSE
12.
When?
How lone.'
If (his kiln L. not currently burning hazardous wastes (as of July 23. 199 J). please
indicate when you expect it to begin burning hazardous waste, and any physicat
changes or regulatory (e.g.. permit or Interim Status) modification that must occur
and or be authorized before this kiln will begin burning hazardous wastes.
a) When (year and month or quarter):
b) Physical changes (include planned schedule):
o
GO
K)
71
o
o
c) Regulatory modifications (include planned schedule):
UJ
|
-------
Liquid Waste Acceptance Limits As Received
13a. Please indicate the acceptable ranges of all physical and chemical waste properties that >.»-
consider before agreeing to receive a waste. Fill in only those that apply, and jdd pro'per:ie»
as necessary. In the "Limiting Facto;' column, indicate whether the limii is a permit limit i p. -
another regulatory limit (R). a product quality limit (Q.). or some other technical limn iT>
If you have a total specified metals limit and not individual metal limits, indicate the
specified metals limit and check off which metals arc included in this limn. Explain
exceptions on a separate sheet as necessary.
'As Received" Liquid Waste Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Panicle/Object Size
Cvanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other (Specify)
Other (Specify)
Total Halogen Content
'Chlorine Content
irluorine Content
Bromine Content
Other: Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
1
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
1=5*
3 ? •-"
n a " K
o. a g- "
o
CVO
o
o
-10-
uu
-------
'As Received" Liquid Wane Limitaiions
Propeny
Pesticides
Fungicides
Herbicides
Insecticides
Rodeniicides
Other: Specify
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
Allowable
Cspeory units I
Maximum
AJIowable
f specify units)
.
•
•
Limiting
Factor
!*!
o
c/3
to
o
o
-ii-
uu
-------
Liquid Waste Acceptance Limits As Burned
13b. Are your liquid waste limitations 'as turned" the same as waste limitations js :t^ei\e^ '
(YN>
If yes. skip 10 Ma. If no. please indicate the limitations on all physical and chemical »J»TC
properties as burned. 'Fill in only these that apply, and add properties as necessary. In she
"Limning Factor' column, indicate whether ihe limit is a permit limit (P). another regulator)
limit (R). a product quality limit (Q). or some other technical limit (TV If you have a total
specified metals limit and not individual metal limits, indicate the total specified metals limit
and check off which metals are included in this limit. Explain any exceptions on a separate
sheet as necessary.
8 0-8
I £ "
"As Bumed" Liquid W»ite Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Panicle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Total Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
o
oo
to
71
o
o
-12-
Oj
UJ
-------
"As Burned" Liquid W»iie Limitationi •
Property
Pesticides
Fungicides
Herbicides
Insecticides
Rodenticides
Other: Specify
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nicker Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other: Specify " '
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
-
-
.
Limiting
Factor
o
(73
N)
o
o
-13-
Uj
-------
Pumpable Sludges Waste Acceptance Limits As Received
Are your pumpabie sludge waste limitations 'as received" the same as wasw !im:ut;or>
specified in questions 13a or b? If so. specify which table applies (e.t- >3a or L-hi jnd >k:r
to Ub: _
If no. please indicate the acceptable ranges of all physical and chemicai waste properties that
you consider before agreeing to receive a waste. Fill in .only those that apply, and acJ
properties as necessary, in the "Limiting Factor" column, indicate whether the limit is j
permit limit I Pi. another regulatory limn (R), a product quality limit (Q). or some mrter
technical limit (T). If you have a total specified metals limit and not individual metal limits.
indicate the total specified metals limit and check off which metals are included in (hi* limn.
Explain any exceptions on a separate sheet as necessary.
_CT
"As Received" Pumpable Sludces Waste Limitations
Property
H:at of Combustion
Water Content
Tc tal Solids Content
Tctal Inorganics Content
Particle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Su fur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Ot!ier: Specify
Other: Specify
To:al Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
Limiting
Factor
o
GO
to
71
o
o
-14-
Uj
ru
I
-------
'A> Received" Pumpable Sludfes Waste Limitations
Property
Pesticides
Funeicides
Herbicides
Insecticides
Rodeniicides
Other: Specify
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
fhallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other: Specify "'
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
O
GO
O
o
• 15-
LU
cn
-------
Putnpable Sludges Waste Acceptance Limits As Burned
Mb. Are your pumpable sludge waste limitations as hurncd" ihe same as waste
specified in earlier questions.' If so. specify which table applies (e.g.. Ua) anil skip to ::j
If no. please indicate the limitations on 2!! physical and chemical waste properties as t
Fill in only those that apply, and add properiiej as necessary. In the 'Limiting Factor
column, indicate whether the limit is a permit limn (P). another regulatory limit (R;. j
product quality limit (Q). or some other technical limn (T). If you have a total specified
metals limit and not individual metal limits, indicate ihe iota! specified metals limit and check
otf which metals are included in this limit. Explain any exceptions on a separate sheet j>
necessary.
"As Burned" Pumpable Sludjts Waste Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Particle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
• Potassium Content
Other: Specify
Other Specify
Total Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
Limiting
Factor
O
oo
to
HTJ
O
O
•16-
UJ
— i
-------
As Burned" Pumpable Sludftj Waste Limitations
Property
Pesticides
Fungicides
Herbicides
Insecticides
Rodenticides
Other: Specify
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
.Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
•
Limiting
Factor ]
t*
aa .- «
• o <* .-
o
a>
to
71
o
o
UJ
GO
-------
Vonpumpible Sludges Waste \ccepunce Limits As Received
I5a.
Are your nonpumpable sludge waste limitations 'as received" the same as waste
specified in earlier questions' If so. specify which table applies (e.g.. I3a) and jktp u> !:
If no. please indicate (he acceptable ranees of all physical and chemical waste properres that
you consider before agreeing to receive a wasie. Fill in only those that apply. jnJ jJJ
properties as necessary. In the "Limning Factor' column, indicate whether the limit is j
permit limit (P). another regulatory lirmt (R). a product quality ttmit (0). or some other
technical limit (T). If you have a total specified metals limn and not individual metal limns.
indicate the total specified metals limit and check off which metals are included in this limit.
Explain any exceptions on a separate sheet as necessary.
-ii!
"As Received" Nonpumpable Sludges Waste Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Panicle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Total Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fli orine Content— -
Bromine Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
o
oo
K>
71
o
o
-18-
uu
UQ
...J
-------
'As Received" Nonpump»ble Sludges Waste Limitations
Propeny
Pesticides
fungicides
Herbicides
Insecticides
Rodemicides
Other Specify
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other: Specify *"' "
Other Specify
Minimum
.Allowable
(specify unitsl
Maximum
.Allowable
( specify units)
•
- .
Limning
Factor
o-&£a
* •» S.
pill
*£?*
O
w
K)
o
o
•19-
-------
NoopumpabI* Sludges Waste Accepuoce Limiii \t Rumtd
I5b.
Are your nonpumpable sludge waste limitations ,u hurned' the i.ime .is *a\te
specified in earlier questions? If so. specify which t.iMc jpphes ic$ . l.'a i and skip M |n.i
ffs
^ *="•
If no. please indicate the limitations on all physical anJ chemical waste properties .is
Fill in only those that apply, and add properties as necessary In (he Limmniz F.Ki»>r
column, indicate whether the limit is a permit limn (Pi. .inoiher regulatory limit iRi. j
product quality limit (Q), or some other technical limit iT) II you hnve ,1 tdt.il spcrcineJ
metals limit and not individual metal limns, indicate the mial tpecitied metals limit jml check
off which metals are included in this limit. Explain any exceptions on 3 separate sheet j>
necessary.
"As Burned" Nonpumpabk Sludfes Waste Limn.itioni
Property
Heat of Com buition
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Panicle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Total Halogen Content
Cilorine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Oi hen Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify uniu)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
Limning
Factor
o
oo
O
o
LU
-------
".As Burned" Nonputnpablc Sludges Wane Limitations
Property
Pesticides
Fungicides
Herbicides
Insecticides
Rodenticides
Other: Specify
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Concent
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercuiy Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
rhalliutn Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
Allowable
upecily units)
Maximum
Allowable
1 specify units)
Limiting
Factor
»«
O
c/a
to
o
o
-21-
uu
-------
Containerized Solids Watte Acctpuoct Limui Xi Rrcnted
toa. Are your containerized solids waste limitations 'jj received" the same js « ute II.T.JJ:. r>
soecified in earlier questions? If so. specify which lablc applies (e.g.. IJa( id ixip t.' .*"
It no. please indicate the acceptable ranges ot all physical and chemical waste properties. :(ij:
you consider before agreeing to receive a waste. Fill m only those that apply, and jjj
properties as necessary. In the 'Limning Factor column, indicate whether the Itmn ,» j
permit limit (P). another regulatory limit (R). a product quality limit (0). or sorrw oiher
technical limit iT). If you have a total specified metals limit and not individual metal limns.
indicate the total specified metals limit and check off which metals are included in this limit..
Explain any exceptions on a separate sheet as necessary.
"As Received" Contaiaerlzed Solids Wasie Limitations
Properly
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Panicle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content •
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Total Halogen Ccntent
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
.
Limiting
Facior
•
o
C/3
to
O
O
ULJ
UU
UU
-------
Ai Received" Containerized Solids Waste Limitations
Property
Pesticides
Fungicides
Herbicides
Insecticides
Rodenricides
Other Specify
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
.Allowable
< specify units)
•
Limiting
Factor
5|s
• i'-S
jl?|.
s
li
O
CO
O
O
UJ
ULJ
-------
Containerized Solids Waste \ccepunce Limits \t Burned
16b.
Are your containerized solids waste limitations 'as turned" the same as »aiie !im:ij:i."-.>
specified in earlier questions,' If so. specify which table applies (e.g.. I3aj and skip to !"..•
It' no. please indicate the limitations on all physical and chemical waste properties as
Fill in only those that apply, and add properties as necessary. In (he 'Limiting Factor
column, indicate whether the limn is a permit limn tP). another regulatory limit ,Ri, j
product quality limit (Q}. or some oiher technical limit ("H. If you have a total specitied
metals limit and net individual metal limits, indicate the iota! specified metals limit and check
oft" which metals are included in this limit. Explain any exceptions on a separate sheet as
necessary.
•9 «•
- •< z
o. a ,- «
- o « —
2 ft 8
"As Burned" Containerized Solids Waste Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Waier Content
Total Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Particle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Otter: Specify
Otiier: Specify
To:al Halogen Content
Ch orine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
o
GO
Is)
O
O
uy!
uu
un
-------
AJ Burned" Containerized Solid! Waste Limitations
Property
Pesticides
Fungicides
Herbicides .
Insecticides
Rodenticides
Other: Specify
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
^
Limiting
Factor
C £
|-.|
o
oo
o
o
ULJ
uj
i
on
-------
Bulk Solids Waste Acceptance Limits As Received
i
I7a. Are your bulk solids waste limitations "as received" the same as waste limitations spec;t:eu .-
earlier questions? If so. specify which .table applies (e.g.. Ua) and skip to l~b:
If no. please indicate the acceptable ranges ot all physical and chemical waste prop~ertie» thj-
you consider before agreeing to receive a waste. Fill in only those that apply, and joJ'
properties as necessary. In the 'Limiting Factor' column, indicate whether the limit is j
permit limit {P}. another regulatory limit (R). a product quality limit (0). or some othc'
technical limit (T). If you have a total specified metals limit and not individual metal l.miii
indicate the total specified metals limit and check off which metals are included in this limit
Explain any exceptions on a separate sheet as necessary.
"As Received" Bulk Solids Waste Limitations
Property
H:at of Combustion
Water Content
Tc'tal Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Particle/Object Size
Cyjnide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Otter: Specify
Other: Specify
Tot il Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Othur: Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
•
Limiting
Factor
O
O
O
•26-
uu
—I
-------
'As Received" Bulk Solids Waste Limitations
Property
1 Pesticides
Fungicides
Herbicides
Insecticides
Rodemicides
Other: Specify
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
1 Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Stiver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Mininium
Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
9-S
n
c/a
to
71
o
o
CX3
J
-------
Bulk Solids Waste Acceptance Limits A* Bumed
/I
l?b. Are your bulk solids wasie limitations 'as burned" ihe same as waste limitations specie.! .*
earlier questions? If so. specify which table applies (e.g., I3a) and skip to ISa;
If no. please indicate (he limitations on all physical and chemical waste properties us nurnei.*
Fill in only those that apply, and add properties as necessary. In the 'Limiting Footer
column, indicate whether the limit is a permit limit (P). another regulatory limit iRi. j
product quality limit (0). or some other technical limit (T). If you have a total specaied
metals limit and not individual metal limits, indicate the total specified metals limit and check
ot'f which metals are included in this limit. Explain any exceptions on a separate sheet 3*
necessary.
"As Burned" Bulk Solids Waste Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Panicle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Comem
Potassium Content
O:her: Specify
Other: Specify
Total Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content- •
Oner: Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
3 "
.
O
oo
to
O
O
uu
UJ
UQ
.J
-------
{"As Burned" Bulk Solids Watte Limitations i|
Property
Pesticides
Fungicides
1 Herbicides
I insecticides
f Rodenticides
Other Specify
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
_ Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other: Specify
Other Specify
Minimum
Allowable
f specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
•
1
Limiting |
Factor J
I
O
71
o
o
•29-
Uj
j
-------
Dry Solids Waste Acceptance Limits As Received
IS:. .Are your dry solids waste limitations "as received" the same as waste limitations »pei:ir:eu' .n
earlier questions? If so. specify which lable applies (e.g.. 13a) and skip :o 135:
If no. please indicate the acceptable ranees of all physical and chemical waste property that.
you consider before agreeing 10 receive a waste. Fill in only those that apply. jnJ jdj
properties as necessary. In the "Limning Factor" column, indicate whether the limit is j
permit limit (P). another regulatory limn (R). a product quality limit (Q). or some other
technical limn (T). tf you have a total specified metalj limit and'not individual metal limits
indicate the total specified metals limit and check off which metals are included in this limn
Explain any exceptions on a separate sheet as necessary.
ff&Sf j
|S a!
*aai
BgSJ
*•»:
0.0. ;-
".As Received" Dry Solids Waste Limitations
Property
He at of Combustion
Water Content
To:al Solids Content
Total Inorganics Content
Particle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
SuHur Content
Sodium Content
Potiusiutn Content
Other Specify
Oth :r Specify
Totiit Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content.. . . -
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
o
c/a
o
o
uu
00-
-------
t".)
'As Received" Dry Solids Waste Limitations
Property
Pesticides
Funeicides
Herbicides
Insecticides
Rodenticides
Other: Specify
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
Allowable
fsoecifv units)
,
Maximum
Allowable
'specify units)
•
•
Limiting
Factor
-
5S;
.|||
•5a<
'I;'
.0."- I
O ** h^
2 tt M
c ^ 52
Is"
ss«
O
oo
to
71
-o
o
Uj
-------
Dry Solids Waste \ccepuoce Limits As Burned
iSb. Axe your dry solids waste limitations "as burned" the same as waste limitations jpecitiej ;n
earlier questions? If so. specify wrich table applies (e.g.. 1 ja) and skip to I* __ _
If no. please indicate the limitations en all physical and chemical waste properties J> hurneJ'
Fill in only those that a^ply. and add properties as necessary. In the "Limiting Faeirr
column, indicate whether the limit is a permit limit (P). another regulatory limit iRi. .1
product quality limit (Q), or some other technical Itmti (T). If you have a total specified
metals limit and not individual metal limns, indicate the total specified metals limn and check
off which metals are included in this limit. Explain any exceptions on 'a separate sheet j»
necessarv.
*
:~0 § 2
'As Burned" Dry Solidi Waste Limitations
Property
Heat of Combustion
Water Content
Total Solids Content
Total inorganics Content
Panicle/Object Size
Cyanide Content
Sulfur Content
Sodium Content
Potassium Content
Other: Specify
Other. Specify
Total Halogen Content
Chlorine Content
Fluorine Content
Bromine Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Minimum
Allowable
(specify units)
»
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
Limiting
Factor
O
oo
to
Tl
i
O
CD
-32-
uyi
uu
-------
'As Burned" Dty SoIWi Wasie Limitations
Property
Pesticides
Fungicides
Herbicides
Insecticides
Rodenitcidei
Other: Specify
Total Specified Metals Content
Antimony Content
Arsenic Content
Barium Content
Beryllium Content
Cadmium Content
Chromium Content
Copper Content
[Lead Content
Mercury Content
Nickel Content
Selenium Content
Silver Content
Thallium Content
Vanadium Content
Zinc Content
Other: Specify
Other: Specify
Nfimmum
.Allowable
(specify units)
Maximum
Allowable
(specify units)
.
Limiting i
Factor i
a a g-
•1
o
O
O
Uji
-3J-
-------
IV. EPA has identified several types of debns thai may be contaminated with hazardous »j>tc»
Please indicate whether you accept or plan to accept any of the tallowing types oi ruraf^u-.
waste contaminated debris at ihis facility, and any physical or chemical conditions ,?.»!..
restncnons or limitations J in addition to those specified above which would be required UT
you to do so. .Vote any important acceptance conditions in the table and explain them on the
page following the table. If one of the types of debris may be included in wastes you recent.
but you are uncertain, please check off the Don't Know' column.
(Uwdous Wuu Coausmtud Dtbrij Acetpunce '
T>peo(Oebns
Common Cloth Materials (e.g.. rigs, mop
heads, blankets, or cloihinj)
Personal PrOiectiOB Equipment (e.g.. Tyvec
suits)
Paper or Cardboard Material!
: Filter Cartridges
Wood Materials
Rubtxr Objects (e.g., tires, boses)
PVC Pipe
Oiber Plastic Debris
Class Debris
Ceramic Debris te.f.. semiconductors)
Metal Objects (e.g., pipes. vtNet. pumps. BUI*
and bolts)
Asbestos Maiertals {«.&.. sbifigles. iasulatios)
Non-Soil Oeolopc Material (e.g., rods)
Concrete Debris
Refractory Brick
Other Bricks
Slag
Intact Batteries
Batterv Cases
Electronic Components (e.g.. printed circuit
(wards)
1 Electrical Wires. Switches, etc.
Accept
Now
(YN)
Plan to Accept
Bv Julv 94
'(YN)
Acceptance
Conditions
(In addition to abovei
Done •
KJIO*
(/i i
-
I
I
I
j
i
|
1
1
o
71
o
o
-34-
-------
20. Please explain any debns acceptance conditions noied on the prexious
1
•z
'O
•4
P-S-sr
20a. Do you accepi hazardous waste soils? [f so. under what conditions or limitations?
How are (hey processed and burned?
o
C/3
10
o
o
-35-
cn
-------
C. Permit Conditions
21. Please lilt all RCRA waste codes you are currently auihorized and willing to
and bum as of 7/23/93 (i.e.. you have received full permit or interim status approval i
Attach a separate sheet as necessary.
.-?.'
:::'j»
3 S
l»
21 Please list all additional RCRA waste codes you are seeking permit or interim status
modifications to receive and burn by 7/23/93 (i.e.. Pan A will have been submitted
by 7/23/93).
o
C/2
to
71
o
o
23. If you are not authorized to receive and bum "newly identified" wastes F037, F038,
F039, F032, F034. F035. K088, K14MC145. K147-K131, or D018-D043, what would
you have to do to be authorized for those codes?
-35-
Uj
-c
—I
-------
24. Please till m the following table tor all auihonranons you require in order :o rum
RCRA hazardous wastes. Consider all permits that limit your ability to ?urn
hazardous wastes. Also indicate when you expect final authorizations. Please use :he
following permit status codes in the current status column:
NR - Permit ^ot Required (explain in note)
FP - £utly Eermitted to receive RCRA hazardous wanes
PM - £reparing Permit Modification for Additional Wastes
SA - Submitted Complete Applicaiion and Awaiting Response from Issuing Agency
.VIA - Modifying Permit Application for Additional RCRA Wastes
IS - Interim Status
ND - Currently Responding to Donees of Deficiency in Application
PH • Awaiting £ublic Hearing on Permit
OT • Qjher (please specify):
* S f
' irB
a o, •- »
• rt W ^
Authorization Required
Federal
BIF
RCRA Storage
RCRA Treatment
Clean Air Act
Other (specify)
$tttf
Hazardous Waste
Air Emission
Land Uw/Siring
Other (specify)
Local
Hazardous Waste
Air Emission
Land Use/Siting
Other (specify)
Authorizing Agency Name
and Phone Number
Current
Status
Expected Date
of Authorization
o
DO
o
o
-37-
Uj
GO
-------
••a
i
f
Please describe any permit changes other than R^rfTnrTmrnn tnal wl!, he ^
for you to continue to burn hazardous waste as at present or to begm burning
hazardous waste in any of the kilns mcluded in this form. Also indicate when v™
expea the changes to be made, and when and how you would have to charge vour
current practices if these changes are not approved. " '
O
GO
O
o
26. When do you plan to submit a Pan B Application {month and year)?
-38-
Uj
-------
Do you plan to make any changes 10 the hazardous waste burning practices
facility before July 1994?
Yes
No
•.•
:S. If you do plan 10 make changes to this facility, please describe the nature of each
modification (including lain number for specific changes), when you expect it to be
completed and fully operational, and the effect it wilt have on this facility's hazardous
waste capacity. Include modifications to waste receiving facilities, fuel processing
systems, waste feed systems, analytical equipment and facilities, and air pollution
control devices. You may attach appropriate sections of your precompliance
certification that describe these changes if convenient.
a) When (month or quarter, and year):
b) Effect on hazardous waste capacity:
o
00
to
71
o
o
c) Modifications:
-39-
LU
un
i
CD
I
-------
APPENDIX C
AVAILABLE CAPACITY ANALYSIS TELEPHONE LOGS
!*"
a B-tr- »
• 8 r
c a«
O
00
bO
71
o
o
UJ
un
-------
o
CO
N)
71
o
o
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
** COUNT **
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED : 2
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED : 2
**» SEND ***
No.
KE2MOTE STATION
ay i e ia+uas M uos ia* 13
START TIME l»K\lli>S>C.\CillS
+ -.20-94 1:34in| | i ...i-j L'/ 2
\K)DE
i:c
Kl-.Sl I.TS
covuum-u
UfiOO
No.: OfLKATION M MBi;R 48 : 4HUO8PS SEUECTI.O l.l I KKOK fl HUM-XT Ca : C2 OAtMl NlfATUlN
TO : COLt.tD BY KEMOTE SF = STORI: * FOR»AkU XI Kl l.\> IMTIATK KS : KI-ll-AV .STATION
Ml) : SEND TO MAILBOX I>C : Pt>U.I\G A REMOTE Ml- ill 1.1 I -llit.l.tNC KM : KI-XIUU- Id MI-AHiKY
-------
PBl cfR 20 '94 12:13
s*rt--.-l» 3««M|«. V» M(W
A>TUS
FAX TRANSMtTTAL SHEET
4
(Including Cover Sheet)
a^-x^r >^y
s**<»;£4'
/jt i
C0rvC**it t*~tvt
If there are any problems with this transralttaJ, please call
459-3475, extension: grj-/f . Thank You!
s
'M
o
C^5
to
71
o
o
UJ
LH
UJ
-------
4-20-94 :
u. ru_ it-K <)} *
JCF 1«c«rp«med-9l«a469514005I24l35;» 2/ 2
Aptes C«lfcy*ine, ICiuHUti
Apttu. a Wettbihouw eompuy, ha both TSCA «nd R.CRA P«n 0 penuib. The
Iniueator uoit ii • «l«atDj rouiy lula with * Ittennil mpui oC 61.9 MMBtmlxiur. TTw fadliiy
an «acpt ligutdi; purap*M« tfudja, ixmpvKpibie tludfa, ouauloeraod Mi)illd« into the tocuortlM unit.
capacity InfonaAtloo proyMed by Ui« (Kilily indudod qualities at wwie
*"*"''••••" pnctkcl buraiac
-------
K-tf.OO R.O
-»x>.
•• KOM:
If t- I.M-t
?» f IIJ iTCTi « lt« !-•.•.,• .-v»-- -
itwr«v
.*(.-.!. f: I'A. C'«...
n
CO
to
O
O
TRA\SMISSI<)\ KI-I^^
THIS DOCI MEM HAS CC)\I:lK\i!:D
{REDI'CHD SAMPLE- AliOVII - SI-:!-: UI{TAILS !iKLO\V
** C(;LAT **
T07AL PAGES SCAXXHl) . : 2 .
TOTAL PAGES CONt;IRMf{l) : 12
Mill
''I . k\. I' '. -.. "...I-.-,
i:il i I i ! I !) i-'l -• \ , i
-.a; • :.: '.» u v.\n i \
! <
Tl
-------
BPR-22-19S4 a-IK FROM
TO
91"e392497acitjfbiclf-i'ttadty uujpb fa»
U aewtj Iklcd ind ac«V ifc*UScd waca bdwftnj wtn Utai extfA ibe tnriciij
cfc.r««e*dE(53PR4W6a.T.K»teySqiUwl>er>*J
bctnuadvcoedUeetid. Onnfid«i«d daaew* •• 0>c proQe wOJ bo htakcd out In UK oou
-------
'I
'•A
This fwiitj tu« * RCRA hit-B ptmrlt-'Bd operate me tlaatag rctuy kiln inainentnr
he fiatta M»qio> Ikiiri, pumpsiJe sludges. cbottuKiixd sali^, bulk JOlid», sad jofc.
mil The fiatta M»qio>
' '
13CA
Hity^aPCtoivrti, iquJcfbc >atu> tf lidt noiAK-thc-4W>>3u »ey: The bdotntor ijstaa
M Cbfe faeilily a 4 sfog|faf rotty kin wilh en sHrfaunft. Thit ijKien ha a tbimntl Input of ytS' rfO
Tkis btaity ii equipped wilh icven! meekninnt frw footing v»lr nrtn tbc lUofog rutary
frfr* Uqotdf ire mjcded dircctiy lion • tUnge oak law ibo tOi ind.'ur afiabuimx dunibcr.
Fu«f>Ii«na|iw^tT to*w Ono 10,000 ocnlipohc, ire fed vu i cement pump.
Bulk .vXid» tat wovmuyttik tludga «re pUocd bto bohlhig tonia. Froai lb«w tmb, the »»te»
me wovol ty • dRtvbe> to M ap«oo tccda vbae :tc WOK b t&LQjgf-r °"" '^ Ula fc«J
thubs. Omtaineriiod «olid« tbti do not require tfuaWtet (c.^. SaiMJvv; fed djnxiljr into the kih
via 13 etevuor fe-1 tyttm. Cooutoentod KAb Md bulk toll* tbti require ihreckfinj tre
pwoesxrf t&rough * ifaceddn pnot to teiaf pi*c«d bto iionec tanta.
Q, Q. M.
• o
Q
I*
\\
O
C/3
to
71
o
o
•• DfLATT - tXI NOT CITE OR QCOTE -
uu
I
unj
• TOT*.
1
-------
FACSIMILE
ICJF INCORPORATED
P-**ll.t{*« 0whf**ltfcJna MWTTO Survey*
cm v*«h
n
Ei»A to «urr«»Uy wrfcja* tb* c«p*«l*y bM-hf OVMI* ill*vum*nl for it» E,DK «At»*ciey •a«Iy«f« for
fb*** Zt e*wly lUwtf »n4 nvwly lo»ntifl*d w**ta* rM-f |»«-»lfl*« *»* •**!• oamm*rvl*I oembtutlon r*otllcy
f***ll*jf pruHi** ooniAln lnrbnn*>lan oa
,xia<. «w«At** *va*pt*. AJLhnMAh ~ "
U C^^Ui* putvUc domain. «H« •ntlr* 1VO3 HVWTC •urv«r r«*|»Mi
O. CJVXpl
Jtt !«• c»p«et*y ^••inrnnnrt rfoeuBt^at.
lacludUAV iba uaft iy*M*. l^»*i»»
U CM in* '" - - -
M Cr»X.
Tfc* purpo«« «f «T*t» eorr**pottd«nc4
*l»m*nt« conta(o«d In ih» r*e(U^
oontlnH «b*c If Joaa oat coHc*(0 C _.
V» tcw««*«aa«t^«k or »l4*rn*i«iy. m«rk •pwetfla inftorBtmJoD th*t aHowt<5
._ _ k£ld*tkU*l «|M«v«nto in ift« |»»0l«i ^* bl«nk«E(round Do«^fn«n«. ^V* mu«« vmpbMl** tb»« (*»• A««ftcy I* rto*
prov<(ilo^ »n opportunity foi* f*eUitJ*« ia oihAnvt** *•>!» «*" r*«vrlt« lb»lr koetloa*. P|A*A* «•!! Pfttar
KJ*Uk «C C7O>> 21»-343« or fma* rojpofia** •<» b^cn •• C'OI) fr»«-l#T4O by rVlvvy. April 33ad.
O
(/I
to
71
O
O
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE)
WAS SENT
#* COUNT *#
# 4
«*« SENS *»»
KO| SEMOTE STATION I. 0.
1 Toa 572 teai
START T:ME i
*-1S-9* HIJPK i
3. OAT ION
2 »»'
•PAQES {
« i
CCWHENT !
i
TOTA;.
XEB3X Tii.iC
Uj
U1
00
-------
Chemical Waste Management, Saitget, Illinois
This RCRA Part B permit led facility operates three dry scrubber incineration units. Two
are fixed hearths and one is a rotary kiln. Each fixed hearth unit has a maximum permitted heat
release of 16 MMBtu/hour. The rotary kiln has a maximum permitted heat release of 50
MMBtu/hour.
This facility can accept most physical forms of wastes. Liquids are blended in tanks and
transferred to atomizers for direct injection inio the incinerator unit(s). Purnpable sludges arc
injected into the incinerator unit(s) via a sludge lance. Nonpumpable sludges and containerized
solids are repackaged into burnable containers and ram-fed into the incinerator units. Bulk solids
are unloaded into pits and transported via clamshell into (he roiary kiln unit.
This facility submitted its survey independent of the set provided by HWTC. For each
unit and physical form of waste, this facility reported waste quantities burned during 1942 and
maximum practical burning capacities. These estimates .ire included in the aggregated CBI
estimate in Exhibit X.
o
oo
o
o
*• DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OK QUOTE - ••
Uj
en
-------
CWM Chemical Services, Chicago, Illinois
This RCRA interim status facility is not currently operating and is awaiting EPA
authorization for TSCA and RCRA Part B permits. The incinerator unit at this facility is a rotary
kiln with a thermal input of 30 MMBiahour.
The feed mechanism for the single unit at CWM consists of a drum conveyor and ram-
feed for containerized solids, tn general, bulk solids and pumpable sludges are not accepted at
this facility. Nonpumpable sludges are generally accepted only when containerized.
This facility submitted its survey independent of the set provided by HWTC. The facility
reported confidential maximum current practical burning capacity for liquids and containerized
solids. Because this facility is not currently operating. EPA did not include it in the national
capacity estimates.
Chemical Waste Management reported that expansion plans will depend on the outcome
of Gnai permitting decisions. This facility indicated that it is seeking authorization to accept the
Phase II waste codes DO 18-043.
o
o>
to
71
o
*• DRAFT - «O >'OT CITE OK QUOTE - •*
UJ
on
CD
-------
CWM-Port Arthur, Port Arthur, Texas
' This RCRA Part B permitted facility operjlc* a rolary kiln system (hat has a thermal '
input of 175 MMBtu/hour. The facility has applied fur ;i TSCA permit to burn PCB-
contaminated wastes.
This facility accepts liquids, pumpablc slopes, containerized solids, nnd bulk solids.
Several feed mechanisms exist for feeding waste iaio the rotary kiln. Positive displacement pumps
are used to feed pumpable sludges. Containerized solids arc fed into the unit via a ram-i'ucd
system. Bulk solids arc shredded and charged to the kiln hy a chute.
The facility reported waste quantities burned in IW2 and maximum practical burning
capacities as CB1. These estimates arc included i.i the aggregated CBI estimate in Exhibit X.
This facility can accept the Phase 11 wastes DOIS-D043. KI41-145. and KU7-151. CWM
indicated this facility anticipated increasing operating hours hy 50 percent in 1993-1994. and
planned various process improvements for the third quarter of 1993 that will improve on-line lime
and allow the facility to accept CERCLA wastes.
i"!
O
71
o
O
*• DRAFT • DO NOT till: OK QUOTE - •*
uu
en
-------
VACTSSIIVIIL.E:
ANSMirr
RECORD
HWIX: Sfvr*«y*
Contractor for |h« Fhu.o U L4.1U /
fttvn^nf for l*m 1-
in «!»« ti«n CDt
.
l*y fffd*yk A.f»ril
!»
•Q „ ~.
tSg
!l;U
15113
iS*So
!~"5-M
p. a j n
'lag
3gS
• P
sst
o
en
o
o
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
** COUNT **
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED :
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED :
2
2
*** SEND ***
\u.
1
REMOTE STATION
BUI 8G* 232U
START TIMU
4--JU-'.M |:U
-------
ENSCO, El Dorado, Arkansas
ENSCO operates three rotary kiln incinerators at this RCRA Part B permitted facility.
Each kiln can burn liquids, pumpable sludges. nonpumpaMc sludges, containerized solids, bulk
solids, compressed gases, and soils. Thermal inputs of Iho three incinerators arc 70 MMBlu/hour,
140 MMBiu&our. and 64 MMBlu/hour.
ENSCO submitted confidential business information on quantities burned in 1992 and
maximum practical burning capacities. These estimates arc included in the aggregated CBI
estimate in Eihibit X ENSCO accepts the Phase II waste codes, D018-043rK}44-US_and K147-
.- "
o
o
w
to
o
o
•• DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE - »•
uu
en
ULJ
-------
FA.CSKIVtil.j-:
TK AN SMITTAI-
«J*Mt1.MV M.*f***>>
r*Ht>*i. vt*mi»* yioiu j WT
'IX><
KMO*ti
r*filMl«v Sulimlllln* IIWIX? Muivny.
>>»•» ronlrvM /'AJCl H0.1-9K7-7I3H
-K l..«-l-.i»l. J. l-KA « V>n«»««lor for >hn Phu.u II
•
(•I7HJ »*€••¥•• CMI I*«UM <*«k»H
P-.«c 1 , .( 7
UMVkoi •*«*•»* l^tuutiiv'.m). H.HA plan* m tiwiufla tm«i pn*lifi
In Um t<«ruM:Uy Ui«uk.H»t»«*i*rt Jii^umcrtt. 1ti*»« r«V*Jl*y />r*tfj|«*» M>
inel.»«f{r>C «lMi.unlc tyiM*. WM-M» ««u«Mn»u.*O. *na h^At r*l«n«» raffing*.
). In ih* r*k»Ulltt »l**»mMtn, thki •••tmtlru IWMCk MWJC* S«.rwy r»»f%*il«»»
•w C»I.
niMln
. AH.._
> hi«vx*
.
CTt*«ITJ*'.iiU*l
.
In *bv nv>D*COl
!»
ccB
?£ff|
S-^^s^z
3 " -0
•*
5&a
|?8
- » o
-•»e"
o-°- & *
• R t
i!»
1st
o
C/3
o
o
TRANSMISSI ON RRf'CRT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
** COUNT **
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED
2
2
*** 5U\D ***
\...
i
RIMOTK STATION
HWi 587 3 138
ST«RT THIK |w KM'KA
4-ia-lH lu::j()A\i | 1 i'I"
• I'AOl-S
'!/ 'J
\tOOK
ir
RKSI I.TS
COMI1.KTKO
72«0
TOTAL 0:nl BY RI-MOTE SF : STOKE « KOR*AKD Kl : KIJ.AY IMTIATK
MU : SEND TO MAILBOX 1
-------
SP .l^tf""!
Laidlaw Environmental Services, IDC, Roebuck, Siiulh Carolina
This facility is fully permitted but the permit is under appeal. Laidlaw operates one liquid
injection unit that injects and burns pumpablc liquids. The confidential business informalion
provided included quantities of waste burned in 1992 and maximum current praciical burning
capacity. These estimates are included in the aggregated CBI estimate in Exhibit X.
Of the Phase II wastes, this facility accepts DOlX-43 waste codes. Laidlaw is seeking—
receive and burn K141-U5 and KI47-I5I waxlcs.
} ^5
o
C/3
to
>TJ
O
O
/•—N
•• DRAFT - DO NOT CUE OR QUOTE • ••
Uj
on
tn
-------
f A.CSIIVCILK
TICAJMSIVHTT.A.1*
RECORD
• M** I »* ni**—r gWUfka. viriMnaiji aaucM i*M*r
«-M» I«*M
MWIf .*
C*omvel#««4 K**ri »ur«mtiiuU
nt 1*11* «3*»n«Pf»»i«»«J*»n«»* to •«»
€*» *!»• r*«jii*y fi**«nU;*. To (h
C.'UI t
»w.vfn«n». \Va mu»1 cn*|MiM»U« thm Ifrta Agency bi not
en Afl**rw4»* wJ« MT rewrite tlirlj n«-t:IKm«. I*|CM«C cntl Kcter
BM« «»» hln% »t
*T •*
i ^?5
> n 3 «
IsB
|!SU
iHI!
!£.*£"
?-&sr"
s°-s
g»^
TRANSMISSI ON! REPORT
o
CO
o
o
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
{REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
** COUNT *#
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED
2
o
*** SEM> ***
So.
1
REMOTE STATIOV
SO23U58aiU
START T MB: |w KM ION , »I'AGI-S
1 I
\K)Dli j KI3( l.TS
KC 'coMflJ-TKD
[acoo
:
TOTAI. <|.IMI r,7~ a
VJTK:
v». = OPERATION; \IMBER 4» = •taixiui-s si:i.r;fri;i) i.t ; i KKOK COKKI-CI ca : c
PD : i>OLLKD BY REMOTE SF : STORIi « I-'MK»AKU Kl • KH.AY IMTIATE KS : KI3.AY STATIiiS
MB •• SEVD TO MAILBOX I"C : POLLING A KICW)TI-: v»' : W I.TI-l*U)J.tSC KM : kl-XKI\K TO
uu
en
an
-------
L.W.D. Inc., Calvert City, Kentucky
nil"r>y ifte Male regulatory agency.
rale under interim status while the
appeal is under consideration. L.W.D. has three incinerators al this facility: one liquid injection-
unit and two rotary kilns. The liquid injection incinerator burns liquids. The ruiary kilns burn
liquids, bulk solids, containerized solids, and purr.pahle sludges. The liquid injection unit has a
thermal input of 40 MMBtu/hour. The rotary kilns have thermal inputs of 50 MMBtu/hour and
100 MMBtu/hour.
P-g-sr!
.
This facility submitted its survey independent of the set submitted by HWTC. The facility .l
provided information on quantities bumcd in 1992 and nuximum practical burning capacities.
These estimates arc included in the aggregated CBI estimate in L\lnbit X. LW.D. Inc. accepts
the Phase II wastes DO 18-043, K141-1-45. and K147-I5I.
n
C/5
O
o
Uj
j
en
I
-------
FACTS IMILE
TRA1M S iVI rXTTAL.
RKCO&D
a a — w
• O « .-
«.--*«-i t K*. i*.
. . ,
In «hv f-*-»'iiv (.tul^l*- Xo iH.« *:nU.
not v*»mnlr* < "HI ml>trmu*|h»»t. ' «• ««ti*^*n nl
i t.y KtMvtv. /\.pnl
o
V3
K)
o
o
TR AXSMISSI OX REl
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
** COUNT ##
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED : 2
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED : 2
**« yi-:\D ***
Vn. i KI-IMUII-: sr.vi'KA i
M;«)i/:
Kl SI I.IS
\OIK--
Nil : ".r-l> ki ML.\1 I'.III.MI-.
\ koriii- vi' Mi LI I i•
-------
FACSIMILE
TRANSMITTAL
RECORD
ICF INCORPORATED
9300 1« Hrtm* l*rf«, Vtjjnn 220J1-IW l:a Minuter. (703) i;ii.2«»
TOi
FROM:
sufuwrr-
Date:
FaciliUct SubmilUng HWTC .Surveys
EdBcrjicr FAX: 31»-Z35-rttM
ICF Incorporated. EPA Coaimctor for the Phase IT LDR
Cap/uaty ADft)y*u
CBI Iwue* Attnciatcd with Data Gmtainol in Ihe 1992
HWTC Survey
Pftjps I of 2
a c. tr
3 "
5 "a
^° 5
R
EPA it current)? writing the capacity backpuund document I'nr its LOR capacity analysis Air
Phase n acwly bled and newly identified »•*.<(«* including wuio ll>« uchihil the tnxicity
chiratdcriitic (5ft PR 4MI92, Tuesday September 14,1V93). As in Ihe past (e-g., the Phew I Capacity
Background DuvuuttHt), EPApUtu 10 include hrief profile* efcsch amc of (hi* informttlinn
n in (be public dumaio. the cotirc 1993 HWTC' Surey rcjpomci have nevertheless hcun tuhmillcd
at CBJ.
The purpose of thi> corrt»pondcnco is to conSna the non-confidentiality of ipecUJc diita
Clc-m^nU contdineJ in the f»cC!ity proillet. To this cod, please review the attached profile and
wnfirm that ic dooi nnt waiaia CBI iarorm*tit>o, nr alicroately. raark specific in fdrmatinn ihachould
be trcauxJ ».< ccinfidcniiiy. CoofuJcnlial dwncnu m the profile will he blflnlced out in Ihe non-CBS
vcrsfcm nf Use l>haic il Capacity Background Document We mutt emphwizc ihtl the Agency'» not
providing no opportunity ftir fecililtci to otherwise edit or rewrite ihctr sectkinx Please call Pclcr
Klein ai (7IQ) 218-26.^ or f« rvapooses in niro V. (70?) «4-97-in by FfitUy. April 22nd.
>*«r
o
o
o
uu
en
UQ
]
-------
516 235 O233 =.C2/B2
Nortlt» Gvporatlm, Coho**, .Vtw Vork^-
Tb» rcccaUy permiucd Incinwaiion laciljty operatci two toUry aggregate bins that burn
liquid* and pumpcMe dudgca. The fa'hw »« RCRA-permitted •» incinerator*. Uquidi are
mjec!«sd and tlodja arc pumped into Use kiln. Each kilo hoi 4 thermal loput of 62 MMStu/hour.
New York officUh arc considering a permit moJiCaUon to incrcaw Kortite'i tolkl Teed capacity.
Noriiu (ubmiilcd cnnfidentiil ta/orm*Jioo oa quantititt uf uujto burned Co 1992 aod
nndmum practical b'jrninj capacities. These «timaies are included la the aMrcttCed CBT
eiiiinjce in Exhibit X. Of tie Pbwc II w«te», ike facility currently acecpb DO 18-043 waste*.
Norlhe a (eckiaj a peraut midiCcalioo tu accept die remaining Phase II wanes.
lifl
o
o
o
•• DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTK - »•
uu
CD
-------
FACSIMILE
APtfSMITT
RECORD
ICF* INCORPORATED
•»OQ L~ Hl»»-»y
Y*»cllt«fM 9ubinJiri»c KWTC fti
t«»eorpcar« I «•*!. X3PA. Contractor for ib« f*h*«* n L_DJl.
D»ta: <4'15>94
aanflra tfe*« It do** ool ooalmin. Out tziform»il«, or *lt*rn>i«*ly. murk «p«cijr)c feA>rm*tJou lh*t *hould:
bn trwMftt*d] *» ooikCIdMuatt*!. CooAd«nxjl*4 n|«fncnu tn thA pronl* **ill IMW bl*o)r*d out iti Lh«» Don^CBl
v*r*Ioa ef tfe* Fb«*« U C«p»ett> llmckground Docuaiant. >V* rnu*t «mph*«1t* tb»t the /\g«;ncy !• not
Klcta mi (7O.*> 21H*2A3* or f*» r*«pozuo* to him •« (7OJ) ».i4-*7-*O by FrldMy, April X£n«l.
?SJJ
c ,- 2
o
o
o
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE)
WAS SENT
** COUNT **
n 2
**« SEND ***
NO REMOTE STATION I. 0. |
1 213 932
-------
«=R-ia-19S4 UJ29
Nwwra
TO
P.Ot
Xtei«-Poik» Bulc Ctadab Comffsj, Hmmn»< toilwu
Tkk bdlhy nfeeittcd coafldeetU iafotnitioa on qumlitioi boraei ID 1992. tod xMlmun
ertedet] bundsi ctfidqr. It b gpewtag »iih ta btttim tuttut EJT penniu Tbs bduttiW
fttfManttluifatfiiiytruraillquiJwBMtoaly. Rhae«-Poul«c, tknmond, Kcepu *U Phue 0
wv«u)da: D01WMJ, K14M45. ttd K147.JS1.
Port-tt" b.-uid lax Iran tmi-ita! me-no 76711
•• DRAFT- DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE. •«
s
o
w
to
o
o
uy
-------
KA.CSIMILK
1-RAisrsMrrrA.i.
FHTCORI3
IOK INCORPORATED,
K*t,:^«'»«»1",%K7TA^,r
""""• i^Jisj;!!1:::^- CI'A ••-"••«"" '••' to liltn *>t
I
o
c^>
to
71
o
o
TRANSMISSIOX' REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(SEDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
** COUNT **
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED : 2
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED : 2
*** SEND ***
•>.
1
REMOTE STATION
a«W7W
START TIME
•1 -ao-!H 1 1 : KiAM
{» K \TlDNUl
| , .,r|
\w--s MOW; j ki^i I.TS
j/ i!|ir (COMCI.UTKU
1 | !KX>U
S,Tl£= T°TAL '(1 :>" L>
No.: OPKRATION NIMBK8 -18 : KilJUliCS SKLKCTIJ) 1C : I KKuK COKRI-XT C^ : CL> OWH \ IC'ATH'N
I'D : rULLkD BY REMOTE SI' : STllkK « I-'ORHAKD Ki KII.\V INITIATI: KS : kM.O STATION
W : SEND TO MMI.BOX I-G : HH.I.ING A KHMUTh «•• Mil I I I'OU.I \G KM : RI-XT'UI: Id MliMilK^
UJ
—I
-------
(fP RHdNE-POULENC
RHONE-POULENC BASIC CHEMICALS COMPANY
Baton Rouge Plant
P.O. Box 628
Baton Rouca. LA 70821
(504)356-7111
Q.QDGEDI] £
*!*!
» S
P-^tr^
° g
M
TIME:
FAX NUMBER ................. (504) 359-3705
o
C/3
.to
o
o
IF TRANSMISSION PROBLEMS OCCUR, PLEASE CONTACT:
PHONE NUMBER (£04) 359-3772 Dochla Speor
J
&n-1»r?f ;/> Pttfowiet rr-tlt M /.'./i.i
uui
--J
-------
^ ifo ; Uf Uetrp.rr.td-
8S93?03:
FACSIMILE
TRANSMITTAL
RECORD
ICF INCORPORATED
MOO L.-C H!*mny FKiriM, Virginia 20,'l-ia;7 KM ^ui)1^.•r f?oj) VMV740
TO:
FROMi
SLRIEtTi
FKili:i«« Submitliuf HWTC Survey*
Ds»n SuKwlor FAX: J04-35«M705
ICF ln:orpin»U:d. EHA Qmlracipr f»r Ihc Phnse 11 LOR
C»pac;(y Anatoli*
CBI luue* Aiuxi.itcd >iih Dxl.1 Conixinc J In
HWTC! Survey
Dite: April 20, IV94
the 1UB2
Pfl£C I of 2
It!
n
C/3
EPA B turrcnllji writing the c»p*city'h»ckjroand iIcKumc:il tor it* LOR capHcily »nhl)i« for
II newly titled HIM! newly identified waitu including WMIM lh«l cxbfhil ihc ton'cily
ch«ricterh(ic (38 PR 48092, Tuctdty September 14, l'W3). Ai io the put (c.j., the Fhiuc! Opacity
B«ckjfojnJ Document), EPA plaai lo intrude brief profile, of cacli eommcrciAl comhwiiun laciiity
ia iu ttipucily bnvkyround documeol. Tbo«e fpcJIly pmfllta totildin infornatloo nn «xch Facility
tnclmJinft Ihc unit type*, waitex ncctpled, nnd hem nslcttc rytinp. Alihrnifih vimc ot thlt infnrritlion
i» in ihc public itouutin, ibr entire 1993 HWTC Survey reiponxc* h«ve nevenhdcx keen nuhmitir.il
uCBI.
The purpose oCthii coires{nmdcncc ii in Biafirm (he rton-confideiiiiiiUly of specific data
otcmcnlt contained ia the hdlity proGJti. Tn ittis end. pleuc icview tin: utuchcj pntfitc nnd
omfinn that it dtw* mil cum dill CSt inKirci»lidQ, nrultcinalely. murk kpccitie Iftfotminion that shuulJ
ho irculc'U w ennfidenitoL <^n(1dential ctanenti ji (he profile will he hlxnlced uul in Uie non-CBl
ventun of the Phaw n Opacity Hnck^rouod Dot-j.-ncr-L We mtut ctnphuize ihut Ihc Aj(tncy in not
pnnridiai ui nppiirli.nily Tor fatililia lo otberv^w edit or rewrllc Lheir ict-Uimt. Plcs.ic oil! Pclcr
Klein Hi. (705) 218-2636 or fm raprtntci to him ct (7p3) 934-7740 hy Friday, April 22ad.
o
s
UU
—J
un
-------
25 '3*
FCF JMJOWORATE)
R-Cr-C ». Thac
iacioenion h«w^benn«l input mttap of 170 MMBtu/ht.ur «nd 234 MMBtu.'hout. 'I hb (aciliiy
cm accept U({ut(I( nod pump«ble uludgti. The punpahlc dudge* m»K either be »luuiul IT hive a
*u/fideotly knv viiavity lo be injected liiui the furo*.v.
Rbuoc-Pcmtenc did not tufcaic quuelstiet binned nr miu;«um prucUcel capacity
Informttkn for 1V92. It did, hnwcver. report (he iinowot of wutc received, itored and prixxutd
at the futility in 1991 Therefore, EPA htl tttuntcd ihni IhcK fep.irttd amount! reflect :he
hcuniuui wttto burned in 1992 11 mil m (h* iif.icM huniiiU'iujntitf Of the Phwie H Mtt'.e
ihii facility can accept DCI8-DWJ
r
a a.
• 8
O
C/3
to
71
o
O
DO NOT CITE OR OUOTE - *•
Uj
on I
-------
i?V\c:*sirvTii.K
XRA.rwSMlT'IWL-
1C :
TO* i D. <
rMiiMi |( r-
HX.UJI:*
H\V 1 » "**»
ific J'li*fO 11 t.LJK
in* *l Ni iliv I'-^'-l
l^H^M.- U
ElH^ltj£fi^»>i3 I^Ov«a4«ril). iLl'.'X. |»l w
in ii« vi.Ht.'».^.«tv !"•*. W«iv«*fntl tjw.-iy>n
trwlt*
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED : li
!.;•; M.
••.on;:
\-. • Of'C-KAf l'>\ '.! v; ! ,; iii !",.•• >!•.'•; -,' I ! i I.
IT) : I'ui.i.Kl) iiv X!-:\i-'ii-: r :;ii-M; ••• t- -;«•!;
^!!i • r;t-:\u iu VMI.H.-.X i-w i'
-------
rP RH&NS'POULENC
. Sf • ~-S -.— •
"> lE-POULENC BASIC CHEMICALS CO.
f o'»« »'i
PACSIMTLg COVR B
rot
Coapanyi
PDona:
FOX:
rroai
coapany: RHdWt-POOLOfC, HOOSTOW
Fiion.:
- 5V J/
Data:
tnel cover:
fy
Coanwnta*
7y4£l
vs
.
i
I
n
00
o
O
UJ
—I
col
i
-------
FACSIMILE
TRANSMETTAL
RECORD
ICF INCORPORATED
9?0n 1 ce Hieft-^J FtMn. Vipai* ZZOJM3R fk* Humber (TO) m-W4fl
TO:
FROM!
SUBJECT:
Ftciljtit* Submitting HWTC Surveys
7;ooy Ibmillon FAX: 7I3-9W->*31
l^F Tneorporated, EPA Gnicrtetor for ibc Fhast H LOR
Ctpcciiy Anatysa
C3I [rfvxa Avocialcd with D*U> Cnnuimcd in the 1992 t
HWTC Survey
Due: 415/94.. _ Page 1 of 2
EPA is currently writing tbc cipaciljr beettittuod docupeni for id LDR cipscity anaJjio for
Phuc 0 newly listed and ncwfy ideatiGed;.wi«ui Including wttla that cahjtril (he ifixJcitf
chamuiriKfc (58 Eg 46092, Tu«diySef>lcml»« t«. 1993). AJ fn the paw (e-t, U>e Fbaws I Capacity
Backjniund Document), EPA pl todude^ricf pnjfilc* nf e«cb comtaercial ujmHtutinn ftcitfty
ir. iu cepicity baoicground document. Tknc-twility pniGlu contain iofctnnjtion no each facility
indudia| the unit $pcs. wanes acecpled, and boti relewm rxliegt. Allhougtf toox: of Ait ioformatind
is in the pahlic dottioto. ibc emit* 1993 HWTCJSurvcy rurpooici htv« aeviprrbelen bcco lubmitted
'
O
W
Is)
^Tj
O
O
Tbe purpoic of thti eotrcjpoodcncc is to uinErro ibe w'rv-eouOdeoti'aliiy uf ipedfic d«t«
conUtncd la die ftcOJty piofita. To (bis «iJ, please rcvi'cwjbe attached profile and
l it doc* not mnlaip CHTjnfrxTB.li^gf »ltcTnaUdy. tnark ip«iCcTnfprp«lioo that »hi)ii3
aUy. tn
t* cctitd ti QjnSdeaUtl. COnCdcodil efemchu inihe prolJc wift be blaQicd uul in (he Don-C81
venibo Of We PhMC U QlfUury Bsckpouod Document. We mat emphasiic Ibat the Agenq* is not
piwidraf tuj oppornioity for facilitia to DtherwiK edit or rewrite ibeir icctlom. PIc»se caU
Klein at (703) 21R-2656 or fsx iwpomej 10 him it (703) 9J4-97« by Friday, Appi 22nd.
if
S:
•*'•
Uj
—i
UQ
-------
t.,. .3 ;- .:-:ii.;.". .O.eJ/iNw. ;;;U;i.4; r 3
, H«uira, T«M»
V ' "• ':
Thk RCRA fan B permitted Mlity bntra b'i CBLfTbac cftimatet are includdl in ibc «(|r«(A(ed CB1 estimate in Edubit X. Of
(be Phnic O wuiui; diii facilitr mxepu DCIifejft VMM cudai. ' !^
t
o
«/)
to
Ijl
V
"t
o
o
f-
v
•• DR4FT - DO NOl Cl'« OR QUOTB - ••
Uj
-------
KACSHV1ILE
, RKCTOKI*
;
ICF
!55iH!KcK
KM«»*li 1OF tnvorita*
(.•»•»•** i«V A'*
HWI C * Surv
D»4«: */!*-•*
ItStXmi'ORAXED
swilMIng IIWTTX: .S«*iv.tyM
l«i O/i* P<»1 Pl"itt »--*X: M»a.'y7H- «>!«*
• M|«H!, 1- 1*^ C%nit**«t«'r fi»r »hf PhiH«c II L.OK
*I^M
wv
•""*« * «' a
\ . 3 •
es. *Hc unit typ*1** WMJI
unify
o
i
TRANSMISSI0\ REPORT
O
O
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
** COUNT **
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED : 2
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED : 2
*** SE\D ***
\...
1
RiiMOTE STAT 1 O\ ' ST ART T IVt- U K \ 1 1 < A ; * 1 ' 4GMS
»-I«-S>l 3:a«-M ; I U.-I-
a/ -2
\H)Di; { kcsi i.is
ir |coMri.i-:Ti;u
jOGOO
TOTAL o:i>ri':r :>
VJTE:
So.: OII-RATION \IWJU« 4U ! 48UOHI-S SKLKCTl-W If : CkKoH UHCKt-CT GU : ca OAWl MCATIO\
111 : I-OLIJ-D BY Rh-MOTE SF : STOKK S K»K»AKD Kl ttl.l..\\ IMTIATI: RS : RI-I.AV STATKA
MB : SK\D TO UMI.BOX PC : |1)|J.ING A Kli\XlTI- Ml' : Ml 1.1 I If H.I. I NO KM ; KliCEIM! TO MI.MdkV
-------
917335349748 P.01
•OLtXM KXVIKOXMIXT10.
l»tl *c»»U
»e»t Offie* »oz
VXXZt
»*
VftQKi
f*6*C » XKCVV92M6 «•!• OOTZ* MSCT
'fa/
IJt /MA-
-»#i fiJlrru If^ r£i/fy^«y -.
o
71
o
o
UU
QO
-------
ro
RolUw JtafaoBAmtal SMV{OW, Bttoa Rout*,
Thi« RCRA Pan B pcrmitlcd facility consists o(t-*iiOT»^A>U[y kiln, liquid burner, and
IP iftertunicr. The thermal input to tbc unit a rated at ».o MMBtu/hour..
Seven] ffiocbsutanu are used tc feed waste Into the incinerator sjxtem. Liquiib are
atomized under lir procure ud iqjected into the liquid burner «nd afierhurner dumber. A
positive displacement pump feeds puiapabte ttodce* Into the rotary b'ln. Containerized tolidk are
fed into tbe unit via a conveyor tyitem. This beiSty gew:r4ly doe* not auccpt hulk sclidi. but it
doc* Mcept «rHU.
GmCdeotiol copvcity Infongaiiou proved by the lacility included the waste quantities
bumcd during 1992 nod the mmiauin pnciiei] burolof capacity. Thise etUowtes are included in
the aj|rcj»tod CK cituoatc in Exhibit X Thj [tcllity iadicftted that it accepb the Phua fl y
waste* D018-043. K14M45, nod KI47-151.
c
c
*0
r+ i—
° 2
M
n
C/D
o
o
** DRAFT. DO NOT CJTE OR QUOTE - ••
ULJ
CQ
Uj
TCTflL P. 33
-------
TKAJSSMITTAX.
RECORD
P'*tiiitlc>4i Nult mil tins ifWTC atwrwy*
Mitt- fiitc** l-AXi .10? «
FRO Mi nrp tnuorp«.ir»u-tl
OK tnc*»rp*.ir«n«-it
^pcO^y A*»«lv»**
Utr A«r Iht Phu
Ml-'ft.tlB.-v
«*i *••*»« IKJ I heir
•
Is „
g era
ff 3 2
o
GO
O
o
TRAiNSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
{REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
** COUNT **
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED : 2
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED : 2
*** SI£\D ***
Vu.
1
NEMOTE STATION
47S»S!53
START TI«E IX RATIOS
4-18-94 1-OOPSl | t Oil~
»I^CI-.S
a/ a
MODE | WLStl.TS j
•Ccrtlt'LirrKD |
1 '.KiOO j
TOTAL 0:ni ()!)- a
NOTE:
\o. : OI'ERATION MWBKR 48 : 48(Mllit>S SKI.L'CTi:0 I-XT •• l-KKOK CORRIXT GS : O2 CiiMWAICATKiN
I'D : KJI-IAT) BV R»WTE Sl; : STORK « FORWARD Rl : kll.XI INITIATE R5 : KI-J.AY STATION
Mil : SK.NU TO M.\ILBOX fG : fOLI.ING A RUMnTI-. Ml' • Ml l.f I fol.l.INC KV| : RKCT-IM-: TO MIARlKV
uu
CO
-------
Rollins Environmental Sen-Ices, Bridgeport, No* Jrr>ey
This RCRA Part B pcrmilted Tacility operates one .sl;i|>i;ing rtitary kiln wilh an aftcrhurncr.
The thermal input to the system is rated artjS-MMBiu.liour.
i "i
Several mechanisms arc used to feed liquids, punipuhlu sludges, com.iincrizcd solids.
cotnprcsseiJ gases, and soils into the incinerator swtem. Liquids are atomized under air pressure
and injected into the Luddby liquid burner and aOeiburner ch.imbcr. A positive displacement
pump feeds pumpable sludges into the rotary kiln. This facility generally does not accept hulk
solids.
This facility reported quantities of waste burned in IW2 and maximum practical burning
capacities as CBI. These estimates are included in the aggregated CBI estimate in Exhibit X. Of
the Phase II wastes, this facility accepts D018-(H3 waste*.4ml dki-nor indicate whether it accepts
KI41-14Sor K147-I5I.
,v •:-•
a ET
1 » »
n
c/3
N>
71
o
O
** DRAFT - DO NOT Cl IK OK QUOTE -
Uj
CO
un
j
-------
FACSIMILE
T¥*AIMS1V«ITTAI .
KKOORIY
IC^F IrMc:oMi»OKA.Ti«;r»
»>MJ !i» v^4.***O
TO* r*wt ilftlw* Vt»t»MtlitU»ti IIWTC" 3urwy»
fttOfVff 1C ^* |t»i»t| IWlVMllHl, *--!•>% < tn»t«l«»I».^»U. Oom«l«~J in i»i* J-vj
nxv-rcr surwv
DW«M: 4/IM^^ »*M« J
Si!
KP-vVU
t"h«*«* IX t»v-wly
v*vrh»iiw |34
In (Ha nu««l*c
» cm.
mvInr t»«vltBr«»wi*(« «Ui».-*jirt*-f>i. In*** r*c-l»y prnfll** *-«»n«*lf
ih« unit >yyi«n. ««^>*t*:i> t-c~ ; I-RRI* C-OMKIXT ca : ca ownsiCATios
TO = 1-<»IJ.H> Bt REMOTE St: : STORE A I OR»ARO KI : RI.I.N IS1TIATK RS = RKI.AV STATION
MB : SUND TO MAILBOX I«G •• P(H.LING A RKMori; \U- i Ml I.I I • I'DI.I.I\CJ KM : RI-CIMXK TO Ml-MORV
UJ
ao
i
cn
-------
Kolilas Environmental Services, Deer Park, Texas
This RCRA Part B permitted facility has three incineration units-two rolary kilns with
afterburners, and one rotary reactor. Each rotary kiln system has a thermal input of 180
MMBtu/hour. The rotary reactor has a thermal input of XVS MMBtu.fiour. Each train has
several feed mechanisms that utilize concrete pumps to feed pumpable sludges and an vtuvaior
feed for containers. A clamshelL'crane feeds bulk solids into the rotary reactor.
Rollins, Deer Park burns liquids, pumpable sludge*, containerized solids, compressed
gases, and soils. For each incineration unit. I he facility provided confidential business information
on waste quantities burned during 1992 and maximum current practical burning capacity. These
estimates arc included in the aggregated CBI estimate in Exhibit X. This facility can accept all
Phase U wastes (DO18-043. KU1-145. and KN7-131).
.
n
GO
o
.o
•* DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OK QUOTE - *•
UJ
CO
—I
-------
TMA.NSIVI ITTAL,
KCGORD
IOF
VMM t«t »•••
•ItN l*tfMillltlw* SttfevuIllBB HW^fC:
CrV Polum TAX? Z1*-T*H- . .. T_ . ... .... ..
KKOMi Iff lr»«H»v|taiv«iod, KI*A C.'«*ntf«viitr for Ihu Pb**e U UOW/**
O*it-: Ai.rlJ ,
Pn»c. 1 of 3
MrvU l*v«i
TV»» 7*;*rpti*ai *»l" ttala fiairg»t»«jn*i «•>»»«» •• i
*|*n*fil» «i»n(*f*Mi«l !«• tbo fnvlliry pMtffth** fi*
confirm cn«i W UHMP «*«rt «r«tniHtnd9I ltilvn»i»*ik»«i. ••• •»•**
ii«« «M'int«ln'
•
ol thi* i«it< »rn*«ik»i
t**«tl««m IK* ni>n^.*t>nn«J«nt1u1iiy v«t* •pau-illu «lntf«
•- nOfMl. pl«««i* i«viww tttv »4i4i«;tai.xl prul'llw M<»«I
~ * ' itU>n i UMI ohou'Ul
»n •*
> Af»r
•IS
tr£ff|
|««&«
*a&|S
|58|H
l^^ff"
*f ff"
g 0.5
aS"
Io|
n
w
o
o
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
** COUNT **
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED : 2
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED : 2
*»* SEND ***
So.
1
REMOTE STATION
2.0748 i:«IU
START TIMI-:
4 -*>-!» I^KII-M
Ut RATION
., ro-
»{• \CiES
J/ -2
\K)l)K
L-C
KtCSU.TS
amit-iiTED
!K>UU
ToT.M. ii -mi !",:;- -j
NOTE:
So.: OPKRATIO\ MMBEK -«8 : 4HOOWS Sia>XTKD IX' : I'KKuK CHKRIXT Ca : 02 CtWIMl \l CATION
TO = rW-U-B BY RBKITI: S^ : STORE * KORHAKD Kl r Kl LAY IMTIATh RS : BI:l.AY STATION
MB : SHXD TO MAILBOX I*G : COLLING f. KCMO1K Ml* • Ml I. T 1 ItlLL 1 \C KM '• KtiCtiiM-: Id MI^KJk'H ^*
CO
-------
=-001.002 fK 25 '34 IS:27
*»
"
MESSAGE
O
O
O
?
R.O.S.S. Corporation
Ross Analytical Services, Inc.
Ross Consolidated Corp.
Ross Consulting Services. Inc.
Ross Environmental Services, Inc. - Giles Hd.
Ross Environmental Services, Inc. - Royalon Rd.
Ross Environmental Services, Inc.- Tech. Dopt.
Ross Foundation. Inc.
Ross Incineration Services, Inc.
Ross Service Corporations
Ross Transportation Services, Inc.
FasNq.
216-748-1399
216-572-7620
216-748-1399
216-748-1399
216-748-1267
216-748-1399
216-748-3956
216-748-1399
216-748-1267
216-748-1399
216-748-1135
Confirmation
No,
216-748-2282
216-572-3200
216-748-2200
216-748-2200
216-748-2171
216-748-2200
216-748-2200
216-743-2200
216-748-2171
216-748-2200
216-746-2171
UJ
A.-FAXOOQK3AUS
so-Kta
J
-------
2167-01399
ROSS CO*»fiNl£S
r-lSJB P-flB2--302 ff* 25
.. -.
15:38
,Crmfb>a>OU»
Thl» jaanenlfaa bcitily ha I RCRA Fyt 8 pemJL Rna'i routy kiln ladoetMar
UK! Kotunettcd WMta an fed to tto Ua vta ftntf feed mecbtalm that feed lotu a |tav(ty feed
'•if!
ConfidcnlW buriacai toJormitten pcnrided to the turvCy locludod watte quantities tetncd
during 1992 aod nanmi practical buraiof capadljca. Th««c cslhzuiUa ate induJed in tbo
tjCgr^Ued C8I eitiBuae to Ekbibil X. Of *e FbMe d WMtct, Chb fteillly accqiU D01M3w«tc
code* but did not Jmficalc its ahflsly to aeaapl K14M4S of JCK7-I51.
-fo <
ia
Kl!
Q W »_•
o
CO
to
DBAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE - •*
UJ
CD
-------
FWCSIMH-K
XRA1NSM1TTA.L
RECORD
1 Mrl*>». fulfil* nO*l.lv
*|-f N
I'MOJMU
r»«4HtJ«— ftiilvinirDnn IfWTC Surwy*
;..*)<>. «t«,^». I'/\K- HOI r\2J 4*37*4
IfH l«*w»l«mnwilor fcur iti* f'HuiH» 1C LOR
Cut l»«u«« A«iHHilMr^.tJ with [>*«• C*
r*k**l«B- April
A. In 4M*rrwaily vtrrlluic rhi* u*t|»*cily bAcKcnvuntI UIM UMTICH* '••• ''• C OH. cnpivvfty ^»*n1yiM U*»
»w^ly JUtuU *i»** «i*™rly MU^nLifMO MT,^«M ln«.lvklln|K **«*<*•*» thM« •KtilHit Ihtr tw«t«.-iiv
<-.H«r«ct*rt»ilc CSS n». 4HOTZ. T«*«-N4l»y »cptc«ntwr I*. IW3). A* 4n ilwi )•**• (•-)(.. <
UA^kvound TJ«KU|tnc;Di>, CPA |*l««fw tit tnctw4a f«ilW pruCilvN ^a'««*^1» b4*nuncrcml U4*mtfua
in it* c*p»cliy K»ek||n»\iaU O*>vw(i(rni. Th«*« r«.*«Hty ^*ulit«« t>*«i»i«lM Uit**rnioiion I.I.I\O A RI-WTK
>l If
• I'M,
•Ji
LV -J.
1!
!C 1 kkoK
Kl - Kl LAY
Ml> : VII !.| |
MODI:
1
RKSt I.TS
ICtJMI'LKTKU
OiKKtXT
i M TI AI r-:
COLLING
Ul'
K.S
KM
0^ OlMMIMCVriON
Kl-1.A> STAI10X
NI-L'I-IM: TO MI-MOk^
:^«
UJ
UQ
-------
TbcmilKEM, Rock HIIL South Cirollaa
This RCRA Part B permiiied facility uses a fixed hearth incinerator with » thermal input
of 42 MMBtuAour. This facility can accept liquids, pumpable sludges, nonpumpabie sludges.
containerized solids, bulk solids. compresse.d gases. »od.*oil». Metered pumps feed liquid and
sludge wastes and rams feed containerized solids. Separate machinery feeds aerosol cans directly
to the incinerator.
Confidential capacity data provided by the facility include waste quantities burned during
1992 and maximum practical burning capacities. These estimates are included in the aggregated
CBI estimate in Exhibit X. ThermalKEM indicated it can accept all Phase II wastes {D01R-O43.
KUt-I43.andKM7.151).
Ic 1992. the facility indicated that it planned to increase sludge/solid capacity by adding an
additional unit, a waste-fired boiler, and additional storage areas. No such change* in capacity
were reported in the 15*93 survey.
o
DO
O
o
•• DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE - ••
v.....
Uj
uo
-------
TbcruclKEM, Rock Hill. South Ciroliu
This RCRA Part B permilied facility uses J fixed hearth incinerator with a thcrtn.il input
of 42 MNfBlu/bour. This facility can accept liquid*, pumpable sludges, nonpumpablc sludges.
containerized solids, bulk solids, compressed gases, and soils. Meiered pumps feed liquid and
sludge wastes and rams feed containerized solids. Separate machinery feeds aerosol cans directly
w the incinerator.
Confidential capacity data provided by the facility include waste quantities burned during
1992 and maximum practical burning capacities. These estimates are included in the aggregated
CBI estimate in Exhibit X. ThermalKEM indicated it can accept all Phase II wastes (DfllR-iU.V
KI41-14J. and KI47-151).
In !992. the facility indicated that it planned in increase sludge/solid capacity by adding an'
additional unit, a waste-fired boiler, and additional storage areas. Nonsuch changes in capacity
were reported in tbe 1993 survey.
o
00
to
71
o
o
o
•• DRAFT - DO NOT 1'ITE OR QUOTE • ••
J
-------
KACSIMH.K
*rAJL,
ICF
RC>*4> li'f Incntpofowa. t*P<\ Com rut tin lor tho flln.n II I.IJK '
VTC' .HmvNiy
r-i>« t .*rigf prvftUM ol *iwh «.«*fn*i*ii«>inl «*H«HM»*|«U« *«»i-«l*tx
U,Thi uup-^ly b^-kvniina dr.Ai«ui«i. Tl~^u CxrU.tr r-n-niu <-»n.. bit.••.•».!.«.«, .>- tf«j,-l. l«M.l.ly
tocludhwOM! iinll «re~. <••.«!<>• AuucplcU. «o«l H««I f»l«.-«»» i-n-li.. Alihuu*h ~>.n« «.f ihto u.1... .r..i.»n
taintlw nubile (Jumlllii. Itw entire IVVA IIWIX.: itunnsy r~1«>iuu> h«vo a:»u I" 1!
NOTK:
Xo. : WEKATUK M.M8KR 4B : -taOUHCS Slil.lCCnOJ 1C : I KKOR CMKKI-ZT
ID = t-OUJai BY ROIOTIC ST : STOK<£ « I okHAKU Kl : kl-J.^V INITIATE
»IB : SEND TO MAILBOX K : 1HX.I.INC A KI-MOH:' *«• Ml l.TI-I"<)I.LI\G
: Ga CiiMW MCATION
: Rftl.AV STATION
-. Kt:ci:m: TO
-------
PPR 20
PROM USPCt CIC UBTS34
uspa
0:v« Inenettioa Rally
TO. Sex 2228)
Our
Mission:
quaOty waste and uy-
producl management
services that consis-
tently meet or exceed
customer needs and
regulatory require-
ments *t competitrVe>
eoet whila enhancing
shareholder v»1u«.
X C 0 V E'R :S;"H E ET
Executive
Cllve Incineration Facility, UT
Fix
To
Company:
Date:
From:
•/.'? «,-*y
Number of sheets (uKlu&ng this one).
Comments: _.. _
If Cue is incomplete or OSepble. please conuct.
NOTICE:
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FAX MESSAGE IS 1NTEMOEO ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND
CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENTS IIAMCO ABOVE.
This messaga may be an ailomcy-cfenl eofnmur.ictVxi. t--xl a> such is pfWegtd and confidential, if tha reader o(
this rrwtsagt » not lha intended recipiant or an aj*.-* r»ipc-^iWo {« dorivering it to the intended teeipienl. you sue
hereby notified that you have recevad iKs dococnerj in *rrr. aid lhal any ravitw, disssminatkxi. distribution, or
copying of this message is strictly prohbied.« you htv« r*c«ke(J tWs communietton in *m*. please not*/ the s«nd«r
immediately by lefephona and return the original men.*;* 13 ttw serx'tf by US Mat!at cur expense Thankyou.
fli
"
o
oo
to
o
2
Uj
U3
-------
«* 28 •« HISS
SBff BV'KF I.VCCKtfOMTO
Clr M
3-20-94 MP
ICF ImrojritH-
801 59J *46J:* I.' 2
<•
FACSIMILE
TRANSM1TTAL
RECORD
ICF INCORPORATED f
WBIteUeni PW«w.V' fix-
Pb»e II oewiy liuod tod oc«(f ideodAd *Ma ioduding WBI«I «hai ethibit rhe ttneity
-Sep£eohtf!«,!»?). At la tte pat (feg, tbe Muse I Cipadiy
BlctfroaDd tknuaeni), EPA pUo» Id ioctodo btiaf ptuffla of cich ocxnmcreuj ancbultion facility
(a it* e»p«city bickgnxmd ducvmcsL Tbew bcAqr profiles oooMin infonnatixi oo oKfa ftdfoy
iodudiof theunir lyptx, wuic* toocpied. «nd tieu idciMC ruiagL Altboofb wme ufthn inTortuuioa
is JA the public domain, ihcctuire 1W3 HVrTC Survey rccpooac* twve nevenheka been tubmittol
»CB1
llw porpotc of this ooneipondenee it to oMtGrm the noo-touCdcocULcy vt ipeafK dau
deoena cuouioul ia ibe bcdiiy profle*. To Ail cad. pteuc review the tuMfacd ptofde and
onafirm dial Jt °
-------
ffK 20 '94 14:56 F
SCSI B»;i€F INOOWOfcrtH)
USPCI Clc
: 4-Sfl-*
TO 9-9--TJ3934sT40
! wepc all fhu* H wvte coda DO 18-043, Xt 41-
1M Jn/( fT1J7-1
-------
i
I
O
APPENDIX D
SAMPLE TC SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
n " rr ,
p. Qf »». \
i»
O
00
N)
O
O
Uj
CO
-------
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FACILITIES THAT UNO DISPOSE NEWLY-IDENTIFIED
ORGANIC WASTES EXHIBITING THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC
INTRODUCTION
Purpose of Iht Survey
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
Ofliet of Solid Waste (OSW) is currently
developing regulations mat wfll restrict the land
disposal of certain wastes exhibiting the
Toxicfty Characteristic (TC) fie., newy.
identified organic TC wastes: RCRA codes
DOi 8 through 0043). In preparation fofthe
land disposal restrictions (LDRs) at these
wastes. OSW is conducting a capacity analysis
to Identify 1) tne volume of newiy-Wentfied
organic TC wastes that win require treatment
as a result of me LDRs, and 2) the availability
of treatment/recovery systems to manage
newly-identified organic TC wastes to meet
treatment standards. The results of this
analysis wil be useti to support EPA's
determination on whether to grant a national
capacty variance from the statutory date of the
LDRs for newly-identified organic TC wastes.1
To estimate the quantity of nawfy-tdenffied
organic TC wastes that are currently land
disposed and* tsiereforv. may requro treatment
upon promulgation of the LDRs, OSW is
conducting a focused data collection effort.
This effort consists of a quesfjonnaini for
facBfties with land disposal units that are
* permitted or have interim status to land
dispose the newly-identified organic TC
wastes. [NOTE: LUND DISPOSAL UNITS REFER
TO UMTS USED TO TREAT. STORE. OR DISPOSE
HAZARDOUS WASTES M OR ON THE LAND.
LAND DISPOSAL UMTS INCLUDE LANDFILLS.
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS. LAND TREATMENT
UNTO, WASTE PILES, AND UNDERGROUND
INJECTION WELLS.] Under Section 3007 of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA). 42 USC 6927, you are required to
provide EPA wkti the information requested in
this qitf itiofmaire..
The purpose of this data collection effort is
to determine 1) the volumes ol newly-identified
organic TC wastes that will require treatment
. as a result ol the LDRs. and 2) the availability
of on-stte treatment and recovery systems to
manage newly-identified organic TC wastes.
(EPA is undertaking a separate effort to
evaluate tne commercial availability of
treatment and recovery systems to manage
newty-idemtfied organic TC wastes.)
How We Pl*n to Collect thl* Information
We have prepared this questionnaire as a
guide for data collection. The questions in
each section of the questionnaire suggest a
format to present the answers. We expect
respondents to provide the data in the most
convenient means available. Examples of
alternative ways to answer the questionnaire
include sending computer printouts or copies
of Internal records and downloading electronic
data,
We are providing contractor support to
assist ladities in responding to me
questionnaire and we ptan to work closely with
you. Prakasn Ramaswamy of 1CF Incorporated
has already contacted your facility and wiB
serve as your primary contact. After you have
read through the questionnaire, but before you
begin to assemble the information, we
encourage you to contact Prakash
Ramaswamy at (703) 934-3426. Also, please
feel free to can Bengie Carrol or Pan Lee, U.S.
EPA. Capacity Programs Branch at (70?) 308-
w 5.
*"
-
«Q o
o " _
S&1
as;
i»
HI
n
n
oo
to
71
o
o
Who Should Respond
Only facilities that have managed the newly-
identrfied organic TC wastes in land disposal
'Th» LDRs ere MectM
t pmmutgalKJ meil in* Aamrt
r gnra a netionit capacity vwiance Bom
tnt omemtte (ppicabletiM and ttaaattn » oMnnt dan (not to noted two yHrs beyond ir» statutory
OMtttnt) btMO on...the earieit date on wNcn adtquci tummrtt trtcmtnt, lecovwy, or SapoMl c*p*c«y wtiicri
prewca hunan ntairt and the environment WB be eviiibii~(RCRA Section 3004{h)(2)). Cet»«/-c
-------
units in 1991. including TC-eomaminated soil
and debris, should complete this
questionnaire. Newty-identified organic TC
wastes are defined as those wastes thai have
an EPA hazardous waste code of 0018
through 00*3 in 40 CFR 261.24. Each waste
cod* corresponds to an organic constituent
determined by a* Toxfcity Characteristic
Leaching Procedure (TCLP) to exceed the
promulgated regulatory level The codes and
corresponding consttueras are listed in
Appendix A.
Facilities that flans land dispose newly-
identified organic TC wastes fie., do not
dispose, store, or treat newly-Identified organ*
TC wastes in landlSkt, surface impoundments,
land treatment units, waste pies, or
underground injection wetts) only need to
complete Section I of this questionnaire.
When to Return thi» Questionnaire
Please plan to complete the questionnaire
within three weeks of receipt and maS ft back
in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.
Where te Return this Questionnaire
In the event One the enclosed envelope is
misplaced, the address you should return the
questionnaire to ic
ICF Incorporated, Room 815
3300 Lee Highway
Fairfax. Wgtta 22031-1207
Fax: (703) 034-9740
Anre Prakash Ramaswamy
Organization et the Questionnaire
This questionnaire is organized into live '
sections and tour appendtees:
Section!
General information on yourfacSty;.
Section B Land Disposal Units: Information
on existing land (fit posa! units used
in 1991 to manage newly-identified
orgarttc TC wastes*
Section m NawMdentBed Oroante TC Waste
Uoitsi information on wastes
exhibiting a newly-identified organic
TC that are managed in ort-sne
. land disposal units;
Section IV Treatment or Recovery Systems For
Managing Newly-Identified Organic
TC Wastes: Information on
treatment or recovery systems that
are used or could be used to
manage newly-identified organic TC
wastes, including soil and debris;
Section V Additional Information: Information
on future changes in the generation
and management at newty-
identified organic TC wastes;
Appendix A NewMdentified Organic TC
Ha^ydnus Waste Codes and
Their Constituents:
Appendix B Potential Organic TC Treatment
or Recovery Systems:
Appendn C Debris Tvoes: and .
Appendix 0 Sample Block Diaaramj.
Confidentiany
The Information that you provide in this
questionnaire w* be harxfled In accordance
wkh RCftA Section 3007(b), 40 CFR Part 2.
and 40 CFR Part 260.2 which establish EPA's
general poBcy regarding public disclosure of
information. Information may be submitted as
Confidential Business Information (CBI) in
accordance with 40 CFR Pan Z203(b).
Information covered by * claim of CBI wffl be
treated in accordance with the procedures set
forth in 40 CFR Part 2, Subpan B. However.
information not covered by a CBI claim may be
made available to the pubBc without prior •
notice 10 the business.
If you wwh to submit information as CBI,
please send your response to at the following
address:
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street. S.W.. Man Code OS-312
Washington. D.C. 20460
Ann.: Margaret tee. Room SE-264
Thank you for your help.
o
oo
to
71
o
o
CD
CD
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Font) Approved
OMB No. 2050-0119
Expires 12/31/92
ID* 0121
OUCSHONKURE FOR FACILITIES THAT LAND DISPOSE NEWLY-IDENTIFIED ORGANIC TC WASTES
Section L GENERAL FACILITY INFORMATION
1. Facility Name
2. Facility EPA ID Number
3. Facffity MaiSng Address
City, town, etc.
Stale
Zip Code
: County
4. Facility Location (if
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB NO. 20504119
Expires 12/31/92
10* 0121
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FACILITIES THAT LAND DISPOSE NEWLY-IDENTIFIED ORGANIC TC WASTES
Section I. GENERAL FACILITY INFORMATION (continued)
7. Provide simple Mock diagrams fte.. schematics) ot relevant systems relating to the
generation anoVor management of wastes exhibiting an organic toxicfty characteristic (TC).
Indicate any operations or processes that invoke newly-Identified' organic TC wastes (e.g.,
generation, handling, treatment, and disposal)- The block diagrams are a tool to organize
data collection and allow us to understand,« a glance, your facility's operations. (Ptease
refer ID Appmtf* O lor sample Week diagrams.)
O
C/S
to
O
o
Page 2
i
-------
*.
VS. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB No. 2050-0119
Expires 12/31/92
10* 0121
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FACILITIES THAT LAND DISPOSE NEWUMDENTIFJED ORGANIC TC WASTES
Section)!. UNO DISPOSAL UNITS .
This section requests Information on the land disposal units at your facility. For the capacity
analysis, we compare the total volume ol wastes that are placed m or on the land prior to the effective
date of the standard with the total national capacity capable of meeting the LDft treatment standards.
The data you provide wO be used to determine the volumes of wastes that are placed in or on the
land. We will use your responses on specific unfts to determine whether the volumes managed in the
units vi* be included in the demand for needed treatment as a result of the LDRs. For example.
volumes of wastes disposed in units with approved no-migration petitions can continue to be
managed in the land disposal unit and will not require treatment as a result of the LDRs. Whereas,
the volumes of TC wastes disposed untreated in iandfffls will require treatment
Coat and complete the relevant pan of Section It tat fact) land disposal unit that was used in 1991 to
manage organic 1C wastes: A) Landfills; 8) Land Tremnertt Units; C) Surface Impoundments; D) Waste
Piles; and £) Underground Injection Wells. Assign « unique number to each unit and indicate the
number on each page. Plane note thtt ihrwotout thft tectlon. the tfim TC wattet refer* to the ,
newhr-idtnttfied organic TC wastet.
o
8. Type of land disposal units at your facfty used to manage wastes exhibiting the newly-
identified organic TC: (Check all mat apply and compfere the relevant sections}
Q Landfi (Complete Section A lor each tencrtJQ
O Land Treatment Unit (Complete Section B for each lend treatment unit)
Q Surface Impoundment (Complete Section C tar each surface impoundment)
LJ Waste Pile (Complete Section O (or each »*sre pile)
LJ Underground Injection WeH (Complete Section E lor each underground injection well)
o
o
Pages
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB No. 2050-0119
Expires 12/31/92
ID* 0121
. QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FACILITIES THAT LANS DISPOSE NEWLYJOENTIFIED ORGANIC TC WASTES
Section n. UNO DISPOSAL UNITS {continual)
A. Landfills
. . | Landfill Unit No.
Answer the following questions for etch jctVa fiewntous wasi» tonqtilt at to«si» that received
c TC waste* during
9. Commercial status" of tha landSt (Cftec* «0 rut «ppfy)
D The landfi is only avaflaM* lor tnaragemont ol hazardous waste generated an she.
D Tha larxjfffl is avaBabte only .to frms owned by trte tarns company.
D The landfiB is available to a Emfced group ol cstablishmeres (or commercial hazardous
waste management.
LJ llwlandflisavala&ietoanyGrmorestablishinortforcoi^^
managemenL
I0.a) Total quarttyofnazardous wastes disposed In 1091:
Quantity: _ torts gaJora (circle 'one)
b) Permined capacity remaining after Ooeembof 31. t09l :
Quantity: _ tons gaSons (c/rcfeone)
c-
H
O
{/3
to
•-EJ
O
o
Page 4
CD
-JC
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB No. 2050-0119
Expires 12/31/92
IDll* 0121
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FACILITIES THAT LAND DISPOSE NEWLY-IDENTIFIED ORGANIC TC WASTES
Section a. LAND DISPOSAL UNITS (continued)
B. Land Treatment Unit*
I Land Treatment Unit No._
Answer the following questions tor each tenrf vrtment unit at the site that received newrV-
identitled orcwifc TC wastes Outing 1991. '
11. Commercial status of the land treatment untt: (Crtcc* a//tfwr appjy)
O The land treatment unit is only available lor management of hazardous waste generated
on site.
D
The land treatment unit ts available on'/
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB NO. 2050-0119
Expires 12/31/92
ID* 0121
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FACBJT1ES THAT LAND DISPOSE NEWUMDENTIF1EO ORGANIC 1C WASTES
Section tl. LAND DISPOSAL UNITS (continued)
C. Surface Impoundment* '
| Surface Impoundment No.
Anaw tf» feHomaa questions tor each surface imooyndmcnt »f tt>o sin ttef received nevvV-
itlentmca oratn.'e TC waste? during 1991.
13. Type of surface Impoundment: (OMd[«ffiri«4ppjy)
Dstorage
LjTreatment (spec/iy tfw . .
14. Cocnmcrcjal status of the surface impoundment: (Owe* off tfw: apply)
LJThe surtacs impoundment is only available tor management o< hazardous waste
generated on sKe. •
Lithe surtace impoundment is available only to firms owned by the same company.
DTTW surface impoundment is available to a tatted group d estabfisnments lor
commercial hazardous waste managemenL
LjThe surface impoundment is available to any firm or establishment lor commercial
hazardous waste managemenL
o
71
o
O
Pagefi
C3
C]T»
J
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB NO. 20504119
Expires 12/31/92
ID* 0121
auEsnONNAflje FOB fActunes THAT UNO DISPOSE NEwuMDeNTmeo ORGANIC TC WASTES
Section II. LAND DISPOSAL UNITS (continued)
C. Surface Impoundment* (continued)
I Surface Impoundment No.
^m^^^mfm^f^^m^^^-^-^^m^^^^_^^^_l^^^
15. Status of st«face impoundment w«n respect to minimum technological requirements:
LJ Meets minimum technological requirements. (Proceed to next /and disposal i/n/i)
(provide date).
dRevorined to meet mnimum technological requirements on
(Proceed to next (and oVsposa/'un/l)
LjWil be ratrofiaed to meet minimum technological requirements. '
Date when retrofinlna wfll be compteted _ (Proceed to next land disposal
HasappSed for a waiver from retrofining. What is the status of the application?
_ Pending
_ Rejected
(Proceed to next bnd disposal unit)
LJKas received a waiver from retrofitting. Provide basis for waiver .
(Proceed to next tend disposal unit)
LjPta to dose prior to effective date of minimum technological requirements fue.. March
25,1994). (Proceed to nea land disposal unrf)
[Dwas closed by end of 1991.
What was the date of closure?
(Continue » question 16)
Ow> be closed by 1995.
What is the expected date of closure?
(Continue to question 76}
Owa be dosed after 1995.
What is the expected date of closure?
(Continue to question 76)
.
2 o Sf o
o
CO
N>
71
o
o
CD
—i
Page 7
-------
US. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB No. 2050-0119
Expires 12/31/92
ID* 0121
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FACILITIES THAT UUp DISPOSE MEWLV-IDCNtlFIBD ORGANIC TC 4STES
5 .tlon B, LAI. J DISPOSAL -NITS (continued)
C. Surface Impoundmente (continued)
16. Complete this question ortr/Sthi
wffl be closed by 1995. (Check t
test judgement or «*tt'ng p/ans
O Tanks wffl be hstaOed to
Estimaed annual volume
Units:
| Surface Impoundment No.
i surface impoundment was
as •basis.)
replace the u
ol waste to t
(Proceed
O Unt was or wai IN dosed with wastes
uwt)
O Waste was or win be r«moved from the
qusstronl?)
Q A partial removal of wastes was or w3
remairing in the imft. (Continue to qttt
17. Expected voturra of waste to oa removed boot
W*ttkw*ter«2
^
RCRA conUmlnated
*ofl
RCRAcontandiwtcd
.a— tijl—
vVOtlV
1992
1993
*
nit.
« removed di
to next option
in place. (Pra
iunHaspart(
a.
be conducted
tstion IT)
unit:1 (Ussy
1994
•.
Types of consaminated debris (use Appendix C codra):
t closed by end of 1991 or
fttes for ffw LT
-------
I J.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB No. 2050-0119
Expires 12/31/92
ID* 0121
3UESTONHAJRE FOR FACILITIES THAT UNO DISPOSE NEWLY.IDEKnflED ORGANIC TC WASTES
Section IL LAND DISPOSAL UNITS (continued)
0. Watte P«e*
j Waste Pile No.
Answer the totlaitmo Questions tor each waste pile unit g the site that received newty-identHied
organic TC wastes during 1991.
18. Type of waste pile:
O Storage
Lj Treatment (specify ty using Appendix B crtes or written description].
19. Commercial status ot the waste pile: (Check HI tttatappty)
O The waste p8e is only wabble (or management ol hazardous waste generated on site.
D The waste pOe k available only to firms owned by the same company.
D The waste pite is available to a limited group ol establishments for commercial
hazardous waste management.
O Trw waste pile is available to any firm or establishment lor commercial hazardous waste
management
20. No-migration petition status lor this unit (Specify one or trie following categories)
LJ A no-migration petition has not been submiied lor this un/t. and there are no plans to
do so. .
LJ Date no-migration petition was submits* .
a) Status or the petition: (Check one)
Approved.
Rejected or withdrawn.
Pending.
b) Does the approved or pending no-migration petition allow lor management of TC
wastes in this unit?
Yes.
Na
LJ Facility intends to submit a no-migration petition lor this unit, but has not done so at the
present time.
a) Expected submission date of the petition:
b) Does the approved or pending no-rrugra-Joo pcinkxi allow for management ol TC
wastes in this unit?
Yes.
Na i
O
c/>
to
71
O
O
J>
-JC
CD
Page 9
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB NO. 20500119
Expires 12/31/92
ID* 0121
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FACBJT1ES THAT LAND DISPOSE KEWLY-IDENTIFIED ORGANIC TO WASTES
Section IL LAND DISPOSAL UNITS (continue*!)
E. Underground Injection Welle
| Underground Injection W«n No.
fjtswcr the following Questions tor eeeft underground infection wefl ar ifta site that received
newto-Kieatitiet} organic TC wastes during 1991.
21. Commercial status of me weft (Cftee* «V Oar apply)
O The wcfl is only available tor management of hazardous waste generated on site.
LJ The wel is available only to firms owned by the same company.
O The wel is avaBabta to a Imfted group of establishments tor commercial hazardous
waste management. '
O The wal is available to any nm or estabGsnmant for commercial hazardous waste
22. No-migration petition status forihis unfc (Specify one of the following categories)
LJ A no-iTMgraiion petition has not been su&nvned for this unit, and there am no plans to
* dosa
O Date nc-fliigration petition was submitted: _
a) Status of the petition: (Check one)
_ Approved.
_^^ Rejected oc wKhdrawn.
_ Pending.
b) Doas the approved or pending rxxnigration petition allow for management of TC
wastes in this unk?
_ Yes.
_ No.
LJ FaciBty intends to submit a no-migration petition for this unit, but has not done so at the
present time.
a) Expected submission date of the pecSon: _
b) Does the approved or pending no-migration petition aDow tor management of TC
wastes in this unk?
_ Yes.
• _ No.
f»;!s
p. as-«
'It!
o
o
o
Page1O
-------
VS. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB No. 2050-0119
Expires 12/31/92
ID* 0121
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FACILITIES THAT LAND DISPOSE NEWLY-IDENTIFIEO ORGANIC TC WASTES
Section HI. NEWLY-IDENTIFIED ORGANIC TC WASTE STREAMS MANAGED IN LAND
DISPOSAL UNITS (LANDFILLS. LAND TREATMENT UNITS. SURFACE
IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES. AND UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS)
TIMS section requests Information on the waste sreams managed in your facility's land disposal
units. We win use this information and the proposed LDR treatment standards for TC wastes to assign
each waste stream to an appropriate treatment train such thai the waste will meet the proposed
treatment standards. Although wo us* facfflty spedfic Wbrmatfen to estimate the national demand for
treatment as a re&ufc of the LDRs, this assignment is lor analytical purposes only. We are not making
any a priori judgemeras on how your faciBty wOl actually respond to tno LDRs.
Copy and complete Section III lor each waste snam managed on site that exhibits a newly-
identified organic TC, including residuals gene/and as a result of on-site treatment and TC- -
contaminated soil and debris.T TVs section is to be completed for each waste stream managed at
your facility, including wastes received from off site and one-time wastes produced from on-she
closures of units. Do not report waste streams that are shipped oft site. All responses are to retted
management in the 1991 calendar year. Assign a mque number to eectt waste stream end indicate
tra number. H applicable, indicate the EPA ID Aurnder of the off-site generator from whom you
received the waste.
A. W«t«D*»otpttwt
Watt* Stream No.
EPA ID No. of Oft-»Ke Generator (H applicable) I
23. Indicate waste origin.
LJ Generated and managed on site. (Go to Question 25)
LjRecefved from off site. (Continue to question 24)
24. Indicate ttw forms in whicfi you receive waste stream. (Check all that apply)
D Ron-oil bin . D Rigid toto
Dart car Q Carboy
OTanker trucks D Pallet
Osteel drum, specify sizes
LJPoly drum, specify sizes
LJ Tiber drum, specify sizes
Q Bag c< otter flexible container, specify sizes
Odher. specify
sis
1 ill
ii:i;,
ial!S
t=«8S «
l»s*3
P-8-st
2 o-S
is:
ss» .
o
oo
to
71
o
o
*Awul»i»**incwibt>inMur«flliraitw;cant*qu*i4r. *M»ly4d«ntil<»4ocgwiicTC«nil«b«wmo<>DOt8 Owoueh
0041
)
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB NO. 20500119
Expires 12/31/92
ID* 0121
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FACILITIES THAT UNO DISPOSE NEWUMDENT1RED ORGANIC TC WASTES
Section tn. NEWLY-IDENTIFIED ORGANIC TC WASTE STREAMS MANAGED IN LAND
DISPOSAL UNITS (LANDFILLS, LAND TREATMENT UNITS, SURFACE
IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES, AND UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS)
(continued)
A. Waste Description (continued)
Waste SlTMm No. •
EPA ID No. of OfMte Generator (K eppOcaMe).
25. Waste descr^ptkxi Piwide a short lanson cUng lowce (e.g., type of production process.
dosurt of unit) and generic cherricat name or primary organic and hazardous constituents.
(For residuals, describe the management procedures resulting in generation of the
residual.)
26. List all EPA hazardous waste codes (including ncwty-identified organic TC wastes and other
wastes) contained hi the waste stream:
27. Which at the following categories best describes the physical form of the waste?
Ouqukt (Chuck one e/Ae following.)
_ Wastewater (Contains <1% total organic carbon and <1% total suspended soMs)
Non-wastowaer (AJ IqufcJs not meeting the wastewater definition) •
Qpumpabte Sludge
DNon-pumpaWe Sludge
DsoCd
Osoa
Doebris: Type (Us* Appendix C codefs; or tpeciry type) .
I}L
O
C/3
to
o
O
Page 12
-------
US. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB No. 20504119
Expires 12/31/92
10* 0121
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FACILITIES THAT UNO DISPOSE NEWLY-IDENTIFIED ORGANIC TC WASTES
Section lit. NEWLY-IDENTIFIED ORGANIC TC WASTE STREAMS MANAGED IN LAND
DISPOSAL UNITS (LANDFILLS. LAND TREATMENT UNITS, SURFACE
IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES. AND UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS)
(continued)
A. Wa«t« Description (continued)
l\
28.ll
/
a
ti
29. fc
n
in
P
Wwta Stream No.
EPA ID No. of Off-*lt* Generator (If applicable)
denary each newly-ideflaied organic TC eonstHuent contained In this wane stream{see
ippendbt A ter a listing of si wnsffluana). N more than ft/e constituents, provide
iddiUonal Mormatkxi on a separate page. EPA will use this information lor assessing
te potential treatabffiy ol the wastes.
NEWLY-iDENTIFlED
ORGANIC TC CONSTITUENT
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
CONCENTRATION (INCLUDE UNFTS)
AVERAGE
.
RANGE
SentSy constituents, other than those mentioned above, that affect the treatability or
KOvery of this waste stream. It more than foe constituents, provide additional
formation on a separate page. EPA wB use this information lor assessing the
Mental treatability of the wastes.
OTHER CONSTITUENT
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
CONCENTRATION (INCLUDE UNITS)
AVERAGE
RANGE
'
V
o
GO.
K)
71
o
o
uji
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB NO. 20504119
Expires 12/31/92
ID* 0121
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FACILITIES THAT LAND DISPOSE NEWUMDENTIFIEfl ORGANIC TC WASTES
Section BL NEWLY-IDENTIFIED ORGANIC TC WASTE STREAMS MANAGED IN LAND
DISPOSAL UNITS (LANDFILLS, LAND TREATMENT UNITS, SURFACE
IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES. AND UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS)
{continued)
A. Wute Description (continued)
Waste Stream No.
EPA ID No. of Off-alto Generator 01 applicable)
30. Provide -lati en the chemical composition of the waste that affects the treatabillty of
recovery ot the waste stream. Potential/ relevant chajactortstics an provided below.
.pH level
.Flashpoint
.SoiubKtyGn water)
.Total organic content
. Total suspended sotds
.CHorkSes (ppm)
.Cyanide (ppm)
^Sodhjm (pptn}
.BTU contort
. Oi and grease content
.Water content
. Total wWs content
. Sotubiity (In sotvonQ: Provkte sohrent name: .
.Oroenfc and inorganic content
.Sulfur
.Potassium (pom)
.Total organic halogen
Ottwr _
How wS the propenies that you have indicated abova afloct the treatabiltty ol Uus waste
stream?
31. Type ot waste generation tor wastewaers and nonwastowatera (excluding soil end debrisl:
ORoudne (e.g.. continuous industrial activity).
LJ Sporadic (e,g., periodic cleaning ol lank bottoms).
LjRemetfaL Provide the type 0! remedial action conducted:
cenciA
. RCHA
State program
Voluntary private party clean-up
o
.O
o
Page 14
-------
.
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB NO. 2050-0119
Expires 12/31/92
ID# 0121
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FACILITIES THAT UNO DISPOSE NEWLY-IDENTIFIED ORGANIC TO WASTES
Section «L NEWLY-IDENTIFIED ORGANIC TC WASTE STREAMS MANAGED IN LAND
DISPOSAL UNITS (LANDFILLS, LAND TREATMENT UNITS, SURFACE '
IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES. AND UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS)
(continued)
A, Waste Description (continued)
Wacte Stream No.
EPA ID No. of On-«lte Generator (K applic«ble)__ ~
32. Type ot waste generation lor soil and debris streamy.
ORoutine (e.g., spills, fitters, PPE).
Osporadfc (e.g.. periodic tank cteareng. StAbng docommfeskxvng, plant retrofming).
O Remedial. Provide tne type of remeda action conducted:
CERCLA Stase program
ftCRA Vok«*ry ptlvate party dearvup
33. Quantity managed in on-site land disposal \r*a In .1991:
Quantity ot TC wastes (excluding sol and debris):
Quantity of TC-comaminated soit
Quantity ot TC-contaminated debris:
tons gallons (circle one)
tons gallons (circle one)
tons gallons (circle one)
6. Wtcte Management
3-
I. For this waste stream, indicate in the table below 1) how the waste stream is being
managed in land disposal unit (e.g.. storage, disposal, treatment or recovery (see Appendix
B tor system codes]), 2) the type of land disposal unit the waste stream is being managed
in (j-e* landfill, land treatment unit, surface impoundment, waste pile, or underground
Injection wet) and 3) the quantity of the waste stream being managed within each land
disposal unit in either tons or galons. if the waste stream is managed in multiple types ot
land disposal units, indicate each type of unit and the volume ot the waste stream being
managed in each land disposal unit
Type of Management
Land Oltpowl Unit
-
Quantity
Unite
.
Page 15
SJJS
•Pf
o
oo
o
o
-------
1
\
'f\
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB NO. 20500119
Expires 12/31/92
ID* 0121
OUESnONHAIBE FOR PACIUT1ES THAT LAND DISPOSE NEWUY.IOEKT1FIEO ORGANIC TC WASTES
Section m. NEWLYJOENTIFIEO ORGANIC TC WASTE STREAMS MANAGED IN LAND
DISPOSAL UNITS (LANDFILLS. LAND TREATMENT UNITS, SURFACE
IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PIUS, AND UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS)
(continued)
C. Waste Minimization
Only complete this section tor waste streams generated m g«e.
Waate Stream No. \
35. Do you ntantc begin waste minimization acthttos or expand existing waste minimization
activities that may. In the future, result in a decrease in the waste stream? .
Answer questions 96-41. (Us* your oest judgement)
DNO: ProceedK> next waae stream.
36. imficate type o» acttoy.
__ Equipment of technology niodfficatiOfVtUbaitutioo
Process or procedure modification/substitution
Refotm^ation or redesign ol product
' MotfftcationfimbstKutiQn of raw material
Improved efficiency oC operations
Waste aream segregation
Reeycfing or reoowery for reuse
Closed loop recycSng
Othet:
37. Provide a brief description of the actrrty.
38. Provide date when ac&rity wffl begin..
39. Provide an estimate of the annual reduction in the generation of waste as a result of this
activity. Quantity; Unit of measure: tons gallons (c/rcte one).
40. Describe any changes in the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the newly-identified
organic TC waste stream as a result of thi activity:
41. Win these changes resuft in the waste s?eam no longer being:
LJ A newty4dentified organic TC hazarcous waste?
D A RCRA hazardous waste?
5»
*5i
El1!
§5***
^113
§j°«s
a * ^w
aa-»
: H.
1st
o
oo
Page 1C
en
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approvoo
OMB No. 20500119
Expires 12/31/92
ID* 0121
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FACILITIES THAT LAND DISPOSE NEWLY-IDENTIFIED ORGANIC TC WASTES
S«ctlon IV. TREATMENT OR RECOVERY SYSTEMS FOR MANAGING NEWLY-IDENTIFIED
ORGANIC TC WASTES
Did the lacffity treat or recover newty-idertified organic TC wastes, including TC-contaminated
soO and debris. *\ 1991 or does the facility have plant to treat or recover newty identified TC
wastes, including TC-contaminated sol and detxis. during 1992 to 1995?
L_l Yes: Copy and complete Section IV tor ej£ft treatment or recovery system used tor or
' planned to be used tor managing the newty-ldemlfiod organic tC wastes. For
planned uses of a particular sysem. on/y /ocficore loose treatment or recovery
systoms, tfnf /n your judgementare appropriate tor managing organic* ana are
capable of treaeng the wastes to ffw c/iaracterteb'c levete. As*/gn a unique number
ro each system and irrficam lAe nurnoer on eocft page.
n
No: ftoceetf lo Section V.
This section requests information on on-ste treatment or recovery systems that are being used or
could be used to manage organic TC wastes. Folowing promulgation of the LDRs for TC wastes,
some on-ske systems vritt be used to treat wastes that are currently being managed In land disposal
units. We wfflise the ktomakxi in tffc section to dwermto
systems 1or managing TC wastes requiring treattiient loB»«^ promulgation of the LDRs. Therefore,
based on this WormaSon, we wB adjust the total national volumes ol TC waste that win require off-site
commercial ueatment Although we use tactBcy-spectfc Information lor the capacity analysis, we are
not making an/ judgements on how your facfity wB actually manage wastes following promulgation of
the LDRs fie., our use of the information is tor analytical purposes only).
For each treatment or recovery system. Questions 42 through S3 request Irrtormawxi on the
operational status of the system, the types and Quantities of wastes being managed, and the
limitations and potential obstacles in the use of the system for TC wastes. Questions 54 through 56
address whether the system can treat newty-identified organic TC wastes to or below the
characteristic levels.
o
oo
N)
71
o
o
P*g*l7
-JC
—J
J
-------
O.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB NO, 20500119
Expires 12/31/92
ID* 0121
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FAOUTiS THAT UNO DISPOSE NCWLY-tDENTIFlEO ORGANIC TC WASTES
Section IV. TREATMENT OR RECOVERY SYSTEMS FOR MANAGING NEWLY-JDENTIFIED
ORGANIC TC WASTES
\ System No. j
42. General description at the system.* (tocfocto a description of tfm processes in tfws system)
43. System type: {Use AppvxS* B codes or speedy Svirwn).
44. Is IM$ system subject to RCRA pern* requirement?
O No: This system is exempt from RCRA pern* requirement.
LJ Yes: Ai or pan of this system is subject to RCRA permit lequirements.
Describe the pans requiring a RCRA permk:
45. Current operational tutus:
O Operational (includes routine downtime for standard operating procedures, stack
demand, and normal maintenance).
LJ Temccrariy idto (e.g.. non-routine downtime such as major repair).
LJ Under construction. Expected completion date: •
O Wanned, not yet under construcfioa Expected completion dale:
LJ Permanent dosed.
,-. n
™ sr
O
OO
N>
71
O
O
1A system is one or more processes linked together to treat or recover hazardous wastes (see
Appendix B for examples).
Page IS
j
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Form Approved
OMB No. 2050-0119
Expires 12/31/92
ID* 0121
OUESnONNMHE FOR FACOJTIES THAT UNO DISPOSE NEWLY-IDENTIFIED ORGANIC TC WASTES
Section IV. TREATMENT OR RECOVERY SYSTEMS FOR MANAGING NEWLY-IDENTIFIED
ORGANIC TC WASTES (continued)
I
srl5"
• I System No. |
46, Commercial status of system: (CAecfc «ff that «ppJy)
LJThe system is or wffl be available only lor management of hazardous waste generated
on site.
LjThe system is or win be available ony to firms owned by the same company.
rOThe system is or win be available to a broted group of estabfishments lor commercial
hazardous waste management Percent available commercially:
LJThe system is or wfll be available to any firm or establishment tor commercial hazardous
waste management
dottier. Please describe: ;
47. list afl RCRA waste codes entering the system In 1891: {Leave Wan* g system is in
planning stages or is not cwrenfy oeinj used tot newt/ identified organic TC wastes.)
48. Quantity or wastes entering system in 1991. Units: tons gallons (circle one;
(Leave Mw* V system is In pluming stages.)
Total1: RCRA Total:
Liquids: Liquids: ;
Sows/sludges2: Solid/sludges*:
Sea
Debris:
Soil:
Debris:
49. Maximum operational capacity (same unfis »* above):
Total1: • RCRA Total:
Liquids: Liquids:
SoW/shjdges2: Sotid/sludges*:.
Sot Soil:
Debris: Debris:
O
oo
to
o
o
1 Total includes both RCRA hazardous and non-hazardous wastes.
2 Quantity should Include both solids and sludges, but not include soil and debris.
UOl
J
-------
O.S.
Form Approved
OMB NO. 20504)119
Expires 12/31/92
10* 0121
Section IV. ORGAN|C TC WASTES (continued)
System No.
d
wastewaer
Q
soa
haw mwnwm operational capw*y.
ves: Please prw»e a M* ^scriptioo.
M: Please prwWe a brief desertion.
lHl
"
a si
O
00
to
71
O
O
-C
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Fern Approved
OMB No. 20S04119
Expires 12/31/92
tD# 0121
CUESnONNMRE FOR FACBJT1ES THAT UNO DISPOSE NEWLY4DENTIFIED ORGANIC TC WASTES
Section JV. TREATMENT OR RECOVERY SYSTEMS FOR MANAGING NEWLY-IDENTIFIED
ORGANIC TC WASTES (continued)
| System No.
EPA b examining two approaches for setting treatment standards tor newly-identified organic
TC wastes: 1} treatment standard levels would be at the characteristic level lor the TC
constituent; and 2) treatment standards may be below the characteristic level for the TC
constituent (e.g.. at the concentration levels for F039 wastes).
54. Car. the system, as currently operating or planned, treat newly-identified organic TC wastes
TO (he characteristic levels (CFR 261.24)?
DNO
ONotsunr
55. in o»neral. canthe syaem tre« rwwV-Wentified organic TC wastes BELOW the
characteristic levels? (Use your best judgement and, for the purpose rt this question,
consider the lower than characteristic levels' to be those lor F039 wastes.)
LJYes (Prcce«tfrotto next system)
(Contuiua to Question 56)
LJNot sure (Continue to question 56)
SS. Please 1st the specific waste codes whose treated tevete may be above those for F039
wastes. (Use your best judgement)
57. Please indicate the types of modifications, a any, that could be made to the system such
that the wastes could be treated to below trie characteristic leveS. Also include an estimate
ot the time required to complete the modifications and obtain necessary permits.
>!»
IsB
c ?•
§g
as
O
oo
to
71
o
o
Page 21
-------
Form Approved
OMB NO. 20500119
Expires 12/31/92
ID* 0121
uattfon FAOUTTES THAT LAND txspose NCWLY-I
V
Section V. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(SO Federal Register 55160) EPA has
58. In the Federal Register notice o( October 2*. 1991 (W Feoer* negww »,v~,.
indicated plans 10 develop land disposal restrictions (LORs) lor newly4denuned organic TC
! plans to develop wxj oispwaw •»«>.—___, , .
wastes. Please describe any unique factors at your laeiltty that could potential^ arfect the
generation or managementoT these wastes after the LDRs are etleetive. Msopleasa
provide any additional Information that you want to be considered h EPA'$ evaluation ot the
capacity impacts of the LDR rule.
* afta
o
H
fs
'I
Hi
O
o
o
O
I
Page 22
-------
- - . ' Form Approved
OMB No. 20SO-OU9
Expires 12/31/92
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ID* 0121
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FACILITIES THAT UNO DISPOSE NEWLY-IOEMTIFIEO ORGANIC TC WASTES
Section V. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (continued)
foresee in the future generation or
59. Please provide inlormatton on any changes you .
management of newly-identified organic TC wastes (e.g., wastes generated as a result of
future corrective actions). Please locus on any changes that will likely occur before the end
60. Wou« yo* fce to receive Wormation summarizing me resuhs ol EPA's data co,,ect,on
fgd«s
o
C/J
ts>
71
o
2
...J
Page 23
-------
APPENDIX A
KEWLWOENTIFIED ORGANIC TC HAZARDOUS WASTE COOES AND THEIR CONSTITUENTS
v Hi.
Sower 40 CFB 261.24
EPA Huartou* WMM Cod*
0018
0019
0020
0021
D022
0023
0024
0025
0026
0027
0028
0029
0030
0031
0032
0033
0034
0035
0036
D037
0038
0039
0040
0041
0042
0043
Constituent
Beewerw
Carbon letnehloride*
Chkxdarw
ChkxobvnterM
Chlofofonn
o-Cr*sol
m-Crwsol
p-Crtsol
Crcsot
1 ,4-Oichkxob«nzene
1.2-Dichloractharw
Li-Ofchtoroemylwie
2.4-OinArauiuMW
HtpOChkK "
Hexachtwobenzww
Hex*cMoro.l .3-txnadieoa
Kexaehioronluna
Methyl ettiyl ketoci*
Nitrobenzene
Pentachkxophenol
Pyndine
Tetraehioroetnytone
Trichloroetriytene
£3.S-Trichlo«>piienol
2.4.6-TrichtoiOprwrwi
Vinyl CWOfWt
O
w
NJ
71
o
o
i
-------
APPENDIX B
POTENTIAL ORGANIC TC TREATMENT OR RECOVERY SYSTEMS
•of
'i
Code
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Treatment or Recovery System
Sod Ti«mm«nl Sy«tem»
Cftemie*! Extraaion
So< Washing
DecNorinuion
Low-T*mporature Thermal Desorption
HigfvTempertthjf* Distillation
Thtmal Destruction
Stabibation
Vernation
o
GO
O
o
un
-------
APPENDIX C
DEBRIS TYPES
t.)
Cod*
01
02
03
04
OS
08
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
IS
18
17
18
19
29
21
22
Ocbrl* Typ«
Asbestos
Intact Sanenes
Battery CasM
Bncks, Refractory
Bricks. Other
Ceramics > '
Cloth
Concrete
Electrical w>-es. Switches. Eic.
Electronic Coroponeflts
Equipmert and Structures
pTH^- ^ —- *-j *M~.~ —
rnflf uannogev
Glass
Metallics
Paper or Cardboard
Personal Protection Equipment
Plastics. Not Otherwise Specified
PVCPipe
Rock or Other Non-Sot Geotogfc Material
Rubber OOfKii
Slag
Wood
o
oo
to
71
o
o
-------
APPENDIX 0
SAMPLE BLOCK DIAGRAMS
•. .-1
C «r
Si1
£•<*'
&
TC PROCESS WASTE
sr
0-8
c s
'•?•*
O
BKK.OGICXL
TC WASTE STREAM
SUBTITLE C
LANDFU.
EXEMFrMPDES
• DBCHARCE
TC WASTE STREAM.
SLUDGE DEWATOUNO
IN SURFACE
IMPOUNDMENT'
HNON-T
TC WASTE STREAM
UNDERGROUND
INJECTION
WELL
SUBTITLE D
LANDFILL
o
CO
N)
hd
o
o
T^
-------
APPENDIX 0
SAMPLE BLOCK DIAGRAMS
f C-CONTAMINATED SOIL AND DEBRIS MANAGMENT
ROUTINE GENERATION
>*«
SPILL
ICCOHT.
SOI*
DOJUS
TCCOOT.
SPILL
CLEANUP
DEMO
TREATMENT
NW-TC
>EMB
ICCOKT.
SPORADIC AND REMEDIAL GENERATION
REMEDIATION-
DERIVED
WASTES
1
IN SITU
TREATMENT
1
o
00
NJ
71
O
O
DECOMMBSONINO
MAINTENANCE
OTHER
ON-SFTE
TREATMENT
OFF-SITE
TREATMENT
SUBTITLED
LANDFILL
SUBTITLE C
LANDFILL
CO
-------
For summaries of the TC Survey Jain provided by non-CBI facilities, please refer
to the Capadty Analysis Background Document in the docket for the proposed rule.
•This appendix also provides summaries of the TC Survey data for five facilities that were
not included in the proposed rule.
•s-
R
o
71
o
o
r O
-JC
uo
-------
fl"
II ii
If
?* »
i
i SS
Jl
*stS
ll.
o
C/3
tO
71
o
o
* w a
ill
I
i i!*i!i
1
i
;li
-------
OffMle TC Sumy Stuuurj
EPA ID No:
Questionnaire NOJ
Facility Name
Facility Contact:
ICFCoaucc
Date Received:
MUXXXBZffiSi
0118
The Upjoha Company
Jama Turedc
Liserte Lambrefts
10 April. 1992
The Upjoha Company is • phirmaceaikal company. The «ajiewaier fenerated (ram routine
pharmaceutical production proceuc* curia three TC wasta coda. In addition to these, the waste
conitiei 24 other commoa sotwao. The Upjoha Coaptay reports thit this viste b not compatible with
coDveuiioul mstemter imtaem qtteat.
Patke Dei optntet two deepvcUs for maufcmcot of wasta feaenied on site. The taciltty
submitted a no-nifRtioa petition in September 198S. which has beat approved, bat does not spcriflrally
mention orpnic TC watiet.
The bdUqr ha* an ongoinx waue mmimiatton profitm, iadodlax equipment and process
modification, waste stream sepefatioo. (ecydla( tod rtcovery for reuse, and dated loop recydinf. In
December 1991 the ttdttrjr added a steam suippiai syitems coatlstiai of equallzatioa tanks, snipping
colmnn and iceovtty tanks. This treataeat synem b expected to reduce the concentration of some TC
opattHaeus fcy 90%^ tmt the faciBty w« mcenaig this woald be aeneivtble for D028 and DC3*.
WASTE STREAMS MANAGED
Waits
Stream
rfVmtMBT
i
Wm»U Codes
D02S/3S/M
DOOW
Methyjeae CUewtde
1.4-Dtaane,
' Mnhanol .'u.ttoiu.
Ethyl acetate.
TctrujrQfonuuu
HcptiBCk t'Botttol,
Totneat. Xyteac. .
B*PropoBol. HonCt
EtkaaoI,a-B^ji
Aoanedtrik. n^j*
akokol.Etkrlcne
isobayl fcetooe,
CydohenM.
Cjdohexuot
Type of
OtaerackM
Roatiae
Time of
Generation
1991-
Typ«
of
Watt*
WW
Qoadty
61500
toai per
year
MuafemeBt
Ualt
UI
O
c/>
to
O
O
.
uu
-------
~^i
'• t
»
SU"*
illbl
!2s£
*.*:*
E.
Is* s
f I !
|j
i
I-
li
O
00
N>
O
O
(JU
ru
-------
Organic TC Sumy Sumo«rj
EPA ID No:
QuestioinaiieNo:
Facility Name
Facility Contact:
ICF Cnraa:
Date Received:
HDDOS6766395
0114
Hawaiian ladcpendeat Refinery
Leonard K. Younj
James Hsu
5/22/92
This {aciliry hat two stirfaoe impoundments that manage TC wutes generated on-site. la October.
1994. the siniace impoundments will be closed wita the TC wastes ia puce. The suffice inpountfmeau wilt
be repliced by a new above {round wastevaur treatment sysiem.
Waste stream *1 Is wutewater jeoented routinely from petroleum refiainj prooessea.- The watte
strem i»nt»to benzene (D018). Wane minimiiaUon aorvities (process modification and rate tegreption)
are currently on-joinj. The modtficadon of tee te|reptioa process will allow tie discarded petroleum
product samples to be placed ia containers for recyde. This tiaafe will beip giinimiae the amogat of benzene
is ite ntsttwater itream. However, this tidtity did not taw to estiaate of the annual reduction ia the
jeaentioa of wane ts a result of the waste mintmi'Titioa activities.
Both surfice impoandtneatt are toed u rreaoaeat ttdlities; ooe for oil sldmmint and the other for
biolofiial treatmeat. In 1991, the treanneat system treated, 16&WO tons of liquid wzstewater and has a
mrnrntn operational capacity of 191,000 UBS of liqtttts. The treatment syttem treats the D018 »«te to
below in caaraaerisiic level •
Wiste
Stroun*
1
1
Waste
Cods
D01S •
D018
WASTE STREAMS MANAGED
Typeof
Genenttcm
Routine
Roctiae
Time of
Generation
1991-1993
1994
Type of
Wane
WW
WW
Quantity
168400
tOtt^T
140000 tons
KvUttfCfflCDt
Unit
SI
SI
o
w
to
o
o
uu
ULJ
-------
PHONE LOG
EPA ID: HEDOS6786395
EPA Region: 9
Facility Name and Address:
Questionnaire No.: 114
Hawaiian Independent Refinery, Inc.
91-325 Komohana Street
Em Beach, HI 96707
Contact; Mr. Qiris Jansen
Environmental Coordinator
Phone Number (808) 547-3242
FAX Number
CaJlen James Hsu
DATE DISCUSSION
5/1 Asked when the TC Questionnaire would be completed. Mr. Jansen
indicated that it would be completed within a week.
c 8 E
E-II§
!l|!s.
'llr-
o
C/3
UJ
-------
i
i
I
O
c/a
o
o
Uj
un
-------
PHONE LOG
EPA ID: PAD0716I2683
EPA Region: -3
Facility Name and Address:
Questionnaire No.: 36
BP Oil Company
Marcus Hook Refinery
P.O.Box 428
Marcus Hook, PA 19061
Contact: Mr. Colin Franks
Environmental Coordinator
Phone Number: (215) 499-7023
FAX Number:
CaDen lames Hsu
DATE
4/1
4/17
4/30
Sfl4
6/15
7/30
DISCUSSION
Inquire as to the status for completing TC Questionnaire for the refinery.
He indicated that he would complete them as soon as possible.
Inquire as to the status for completing TC Questionnaire for the refinery.
Left message
* •
Called to inquue about itttus of TC Questionnaire for the facility. Left >
message. .
CtSMtoinqfatbGMrtBMrtttQvcniamitofmrtefvafy. Left
menage.
Inquired as to the status of TC Questionnaire for the faafity. Left
Inquired is to the status of TC Questionnaire for the facility. In
Hantibutg. Talked to Demonic Murry, he wfll convey the message to Mr.
Franks
frs
> *5»
Qt Qt »•
• *
O
C/3
o
O
uu
-------
PHONE LOG
EPA IEh PAD07I6I2683
EPA Region: 3
Facility Name and Address:
Questionnaire No.: 36
BP Oil Company
Marcus Hook Refinery
P.OJJax 428
Marcus Hook, PA 19061
7/31
Contact: Mr. Colin Franks
Environmental Coordinator
Phone Number: (215) 499-7023
FAX Number
CaBec James Hsu
DISCUSSION
Mr. Franks responded to message left on 7/30 and provided information for
toe Organic Toticrty. Characteristic Watte (D01S-D043) Questionnaire over *
the phone.
• * .
Mr. Franks Indicated that the refinery has one land-based waste
manzgcBjent unit, a surface impoundment, that manages TC wastes
generated oa the. This impoundment is • storage impoundment and it
scheduled to dote prior to the effective date of mtnjmmn technological
requirements (March. 25, 1994). The •••iniiHfl quantity of contaminated
'sou1 and debris generated from closure of the surface impoundment it 450
tons and 50 toss, respectively. The refinery recently completed dredging
F038 wwte» from the surface impoundment (3,400 wet tons of F038 was
dredged oat), aad therefore, Mr. Franks expects that the quantity of F038
wastes accumulating in the impoundment from now until the tone of
: would be small
is
O
CO
O
O
Mr. Franks identified the following TC wastestreams generated at the
facility:
• WastettresuD 1 * refinery wastewaten (a combination of process
wastewaters and itormwaten) it characteristic for benzene (D018).
This wastestream is classified as a wastewater and it generated.
-. routinely at a rate of 2,100 gaOonsAmnute (4.6 million tons^rear).
—I
'
ill! :. 4
-------
This wastestream flows through the surface impoundment, which is a
pan of the wastewater treatment system. The treated wanewater is
discharged under a NPDES permit
• Wastestream 2 • sludge generated from cleanout of crude storage
tanks. This waste is characteristic for benzene (D018) and is
. generated sporadically at an estimated rate of 3.000 wet tonsfyear.
This wastestream is not managed in the surface impoundment. It is
recycled through a centrifuge where the organic constituents, such as
benzene, are separated from the sludge. The residual cake from the
centrifuge does not exhibit the D018 characteristic.
* Wastestream 3 - spent catalyst that is characteristic for benzene
(D018). This wastestream is generated sporadically at an estimated
rate of 200 tons per year. This wastestream is not managed in the
surface impoundment. It is seat off site for commercial disposal
(not land disposal).
The only on-site treatment of TC wastes is the removal of benzene from the
refinery wistewater (Wastestream 1) using the API separator and polishing filters in the
wastewater treatment train. '
n
O
o
CO
-------
,1
i!
II
i
II
II
o
O
o
U3
-------
OrtmoJc TC Sumy Suwnary
EPAlDNa
Questionnaire No.
Facility
Ftdlity «mi*a
ICF contact
Date received '
0023
E.L Du Pont de Nemours, Chamber* Works. Deepwater. NJ
Dt» Alfred Pagaiio
Franco Steinacker
413/92
This facility has • landfill available only for hazardous wasw fenented oo site. The ratal quantity
ofnaardDBS wastes eaterinf the landfill in 1991 was 11,106 was.
Waste IDCUB 1140-L-5 b mono nftreeUorobeueBe with wtt and debris from a ipltt cleanup.
rottinely toierated and disposed la the landfill. It fc (entnlly only about 10 percent soil and und. wiib
the naaiader alttodtotabettttae. The ititaa b TC doe to a (DQ21) eolorobeasene eonteat 0(02% and
a (D036) Blooberaese coaieu of 05%. lie entire qtuntity was assiped to NWW. Thus 80% or this
stK*n«is usCpol to 0021 and the remainder to D036V
Waste sutam 114ai-10, torn D030 sofl eBmtion. is routinely |enente4 and disposed in the -
landflO. Since no dfflere«iatk« was made betwcea toil tad wdt o««=iu75% p» torn) of the quantity
WM istlped to soO and 25* (110 tow) to 4ebtfc.
••mi
*
igs
§ ~ a
fto »
Waste sraa 1221-H. dfadtroboowie with sofl. b I
laad&n. It bjeneraDy only about 10 pereeat sofl and tand. the r
ed and disposed in tne
tatdtaitiobewene. 3tons'
Wane sown 7724*3, fiDC wot* onk sod tod asphalt, ta sporadJeaDy (enerated and dbposed ta
thctudffiL Ttetedtty pitas tobefbi «tm mMmia*« ixtivWei, bw 411 aw provide any detaBs as to
the settedBfe,Mta}C. or extern o( these actMtki. li is abou 74% dirt. <% mter. and 20% aspbalL Water
«rii>twts added to sofl wdjht tot i>»rtboninjp«pose«, 90 tow were ani|B«4 to sofl tad 23 tons woe
assipted to debrb, . '
o
o
o
U6^T4,toBbotta|s,iispomlfe>i^
soQ stteuB has • atooheneae coateat of4U ppm and a lead mien of 19 ppo.
Waste sttesm IC39-U3. enrated 4ln. wood, aad stof^b ipondiGa^r jene»«ed and dbpojed to
shelaadfflL ttbabo«90*s«o»eoddin,S%e»em^asphaB,o»hnnbet.»»d2%wai«r. 70%
Wa
disposed ia tfae
oom
15*
The tmaa b abota
was atrtpad to aoffl aad JS% 10 debrte. aad the m*m wit
Tae fadttry has 2 vettinett lysteof.
The wKiewater m*oncw plant b ased to treat a hamdov waste i
The total itnca quantity treated.ta 1991 «a» 40J84 osmioa tons; the RCRA ««»« sntaa total was
k that k 99J pi
-C
-------
21.416 million toes. Madman operational capadty it 73 million toot. War* coda curied fey ibc
wtstcwiten tednd* DOOI-D043 tad tone K, P. tad U coda. T&S system a or will be available 10 iny
flnn far ooanxnisl haxardovt wane Baaajeaeai of waucwaien. but tbc waste most be compatible *iib
the Onaben Worta atntt ud aay tinduiioas set by refutations. The lynem caanot treat f natty
Jlndie 10 below TC cbaimoerinic leveto. tad the ftoliiy b iajuUinj u indnenior 10 ni*B*|e these «ist«.
The wittemter treatment pint feaenta »pptnnm*t«ly 100 dry iomtt*y ofiiodfe. ni» iludj* may Deed
to be iacincnted if orpate tratment itudirds we set below Hie TC levcb. The wutewiier treatmeat
plut slud|e it pretitJled to pteapiute metib. The ili>d|e may require metib t ubiliatioa if inorpaie
tTetUBiat lUBdirdx ire set below die TC teveli.
The U^nid iBjeaten iadnentor. it miltble otJy to muige huuxtouj wastei leaeRted by fiimt owned by
the s««e eomptay. The tool lueut quamliy mated n 1991 WH 4416 toot: the RCRA wiste ttretm
wtal «tt 727 tons. Mtdantffl openUou! ctpvaty b 6^00 IOBL Wtste oxies curied by Ute vtstewuen
: D001, DOQ2. 0003. D008. D01HXM3, RW1-POQJ (only from on
-------
PHONE LOG
EPA ID No:
NJDOQ23SS730
2
Row 130
r>u pun i. NT nnfrn
none*:
Cdsc
ISao-as
PHI
» * »£"
P-jj-ffy
III
Ftuco Stdudxr
U23 Dr.FipaowffliBj|nae|<*. Kariy trnpooible u MKAd te 3 weeks
on th««. ud raodw 30.000 tnctlMdiMiy from of «Jte.
eoacenfeit Qaertonufre. Received ud •ottej oa fc
nun of fMrtonikc; «ffl 0M on aid let m bow.
bmtona
2A4 NA
2/19 t*ft
o
C/3
O
O
•V-
-------
I
1
Ip
e
Il
o
00
c
o
-------
OrpnfcTC Survey Sofflauiy
EPAIDNo.
Questionnaire Kb.
Faeflhy
Facility oosnct
1CF co&tact
Datei
TXDOOB123317
0019
Da Font, Victoria. TX
Steve Bir|cr
RUCH Sffjpafkgf
TM» facility ttaaafei TC wastes feoenied both oo-tite and off4ite ia landfills, tad tome
feaerated m-ctte in Baderpoaad tojeofea web. Some of the HC wmua tie (con ^flh, tnd «e nwied
to badflU vit tpfll deucpt TCmtc saami *1 thmfh f 4 MB nutf«d In nb« Un4a|roaad Injeaion
«dis (UIWi *1 threacb «9), «bew ao-mipWK» petfdon (rabniiutf 9/28A9) WH ipprowd (only
•nibble to mste fenemed n
The foOo«ia|Bewl]r lined orisaicTC Waste Stnua are ttutfed in tandfilk.-
I #8 -
Waste Sma #10-
Waste Sana #11-
Waste Stream #12-
^Ifff fffFBlHI #13 *•
Waste Stma #14 -
Waste Saecm #15-
Waste Streaaa #16-
Waste Stmai #17-
l#18-
soO
debtiiiype22.08.19
detail type 18.17,19
deb* Met, 19
deMiqrpel9
detail op* aa i
«ebrkiype6
debris me 19
o
71
o
o
WasteSot*m#5-
»ate cany the F039 code, o4 ttas are likely IP almdy be
onridfe (D018, PQ39 tcMi Qpe 12)
•anh Otter sM (DOU. R09)
ctotk (DOU. BD9 detaH type 7)
(DOU.DGaC.RD9}
My fcwe the
BIFttfafcukm to 1991. tt«M wdto
(DtKU, D002, DOUl DQ26, aad DUOS). Tha*j«l«BBHa
aoaaad
b 1991. b«M«ed tat
f.DOU.DaU,adD035). T
«(222J001ivridMl. Tk««*••««
222300-119.994- 102J06 Ifcprid t
-------
[deduced, not specifically provided by facility u sadt)
System 3 indode* a item stripper B> treat WHIM for benzene NESKAFS prior to deepweU
• Undoa (type 15). Tito system will tadnde treatment tad iiontfe oaks tobjeet to RCRA.
Medina capacity wffl be 200 afflloa |»Hon» (S33J33 uni). lie wane must be puipablc and
low to tottdf coBCCBintioa; IBM It cannot handle ooataolMwd wU and detail Tie qitem it
todereoanrMioaaadikonUbecottpktedinAB|istori9n. It will only be available for
mint ftaented on die. It wfll mat be able to treat TC waste* to or below the cbxnacrisiic
leveb without addlttou] itrippini colgmitvtinta. which would take a year, pliu
'Dhidt wooU take 6 months to a year.
wan; mtatatottofl actMty was adicued hi the queHkmnatre.
-------
EPA ID No:
t»A Region:
TXDOOB123317
6
El Da Pont
PO Box 2626
Vfc»rfi,TX 77902-2626
Sieve Bcrger, Eminnncatil Scrvioei
312-572-2213
DAIX DISCUSSION
UN 71
dooMhl ttei the dm to aaapnaind.
nodvadi 1C tea oftttt (eatnton - Da Pout tta> to the
hta
VU Hneone
1A7 WfflMBd
209
Mtup orpak TC nmtti fa Lud-Btted Unto
O
CO
cn
-------
i'i
II
!
MM'
•ri"!*!"!1
'•:S'*1BH!E!;
! j*
il
;!«;?'«:? s«:8s:s;9S«
!-. ,.,.,,, ,1~» ».,.», -.
S;S'S'SiS S;SiS'
r
M Ml MM j
s:«is!??ss's:2'S.s.
TillllTiTil
iTii
i^BSS
'LH!
•ittititi
si.i«'s:a s zis'sLl.
I I I N
.sisiti l
nna
s-.,..;:7;:,r^£.
5 ^
3 »
|?sl;
I » "":
0-O.fr "
• o"1 —
Sg-S
I * 2.
O
GO
to
o
o
—r
• .-JL
-------
*"**"**!
. €
O
APPENDIX E
DATA ON NEWLY IDENTIFIED TC ORGANIC MIXED RADIOACTIVE WASTES
O
•g
-------
ilGH LKV1L TC HUSO WASTESTREAKS
S ID
H~W113
N-W11JI
H-Wllll
N-W113
S-W113
II-W113
K-W113
N-M113
N-W13
S-W113
X-W114
S-VJ.14
' '14
14
.--'•;i4
5-W114
H-W114
S-WJ.14
S-W114
K4
3
0
V CODI
ooia
DO 19
0021
0022
D02fi
D928
DO 32
D034
D035
0940
ooia
D019
O021
D022
002$
D028
D032
B034
D035
D040
D01S
0018
If TYPE
KLW
HLW
KLW
KLH
KLH
KLW
HLW
HLW
KLW
KLW
KLW
KLW
HLW
KLW
KLW
KLH
HLW
HLW
KLW
KLW
HLW
HLW
FORM
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
3116
3116
3116
3116
3116
3116
3116
3116
3116
3116
1220
1290
INVENTORY
6723
6723
6723
6723
6723
6723
6723
6723
6723
6723
3729
3729
3729
3729
3729
3723
3729
3729
3729
3729
275
0.012
94 VOL
"700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
465
465
465
465
465
465
465
465
46S
465
117
0.1
3W LEWJL TC KX3XD HASTE STREAMS
3 19
~W002
-W004
-WO 04
-WO 04
-W004
-vail
-W012
-W016
-won
•won
•won
-won
-K01S
-K019
-W020
-W021
•W022
-W(,?S
-W02*
:-W027
-W027
:-W02?
•-W031
•WOJ1
-«031
-W032
•W032
-K026
-woes
-KOSO
-KOS3
-H090
W COOK
D040
0019
O023
D026
D040
0035
0040
O021
OOlt
D023
D024
D02S
D019
0040
0023
D01I
DC40
D019
D022
3023
0024
002S
S023
3024
D02S
OOlt
0023
0018
0019
3018
0019
D023
W TTPX
' KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW •
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
•MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
' KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
FORK
6110
4200
4200
4200
4200
3120
5490
6140
2900
2900
2900
2900
2210
2900
2900
2900
2900
3230
3230
2200
2200
2200
3229
3229
3229
3223
3223
• 6400
5120
2110
2110
2110
INVENTORY
0.002 MC
0 NC
0 NC
0 NC
0 NC
0.026
6.42
0.012
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.02
0.42
0.1S
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.21
0.21
1.98333 MC
3.40267
9.845
9.945
9. 645
94_VOL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
-------
D040
D01*
DOlt
0018
0018
D018
D018
D018
0018
DQ22
D035
O018
D018
D040
D018
D018
D018
D018
0018
D01B
D01B
D018
0022
D018
D040
D018
0035
D018
O018
ooia
D018
D019
D040
0018
D018
001*
D028
D018
D018
D019
D021
0029
0040
D03S.
D029
0040
D029
0040
D03S
D040
0018
D040
0019
DO 29 '
S040
0029
0018
0019
0019
D022
D028
O029
MLLW
HLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
HLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
2110
2210
2210
2J10
2290
2220
3290
8200
2210
2210
2210
3211
2900
3200
2000
2000
S3 00
2200
2000
220D
5300
5400
5400
2220
3220
5400
2220
3220
2220
2000
1000
1000
1000
5300
3120
1110
1110
2220
2200
2200
2200
2200
2200
3220
3220
3220
5400
5400
3220
3220
5300
2210
2210
2210
2210
3220
6110
6110
2210
2210
2210
2210
9.845
0
0
177.228
0
3. OS
0.98667
0.27
0
0
0
18.934*7
0.006
0.2
0.2
0.2
1.2 NC
6.4 NC
0.2 SC
0.2 NC
0.4 NC
0.2 NC
1.4 NC
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.2
1.6
0.2
0.2
6.
6.
6.
4.
40
1.
1.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
0.
105.
105.
5.
5.
1.
0.
0.
2.
1.
NC
NC
NC
.
!.«'
1.6
0.6
0.2
0.2
S6
56
56
56
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
o
'
-------
H-WlS-i
M-W1S4
H-W1S9
M-W1SH
M-V15H
H-W161
M-wic:>
K-wi6:t
M-WICI
M-vica
K-wi6i;
•4-H1S7
1C- VI 67
1-W16V
X-H16T
X-W167
3-V1CE
.1-*16E
M-W173
.•f-H172
K-W173
S-W17J
K-W173
4-V1S1
*-W181
•i-witi
«85
.7
92
4-W198
•J-WZOl
4-N201
1-W217
4-H22?
4-W227
1-V227
4-H247
4-W2S3
•I-W285
•f-M2*S
•C-W286
4-W28*
1-M309
1-W312
I-W313
{•W316
<-W323
i>K324
1-M324
1-M333
r-woo*
1-W004
I-W004
I-W004
.'-WOO4
'-H021
r-H037
•-W03»
-V03B
-H038
••V043
D03S
D040
D019
D029
D040
0040
D018
D028
O029
D040
D029
D018
DO 19
D028
D029
D040
D019
D023
D019
D023
D02«
D029
DOZ9
D019
D022
0019
O03S
0040
D04Q
DOlt
0019
D01I
D040
D019
0019
D03S
D040
D019
0018
D018
D035
0019
D019
D040
0018
D018
0018
003S
DO18
D02C
DO 18
002}
0018
D028
DQ40
D041
D022
0040
0027
0029
D040
0040
MU.W
MLLW
HLLM
MLLM
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KU.V
HLLN
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
'MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KEiW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KtLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
2210
2210
2210
2210
2210
2220
2210
2210
2210
2210
3100
2220
2220
2220
2220
2220
3220
3220
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2 COO
3220
3220
3220
3220
2000
3220
5400
S400
$400
2110
2110
2110
3140
2120
2120
2120
1120
1200
3200
2220
2220
2220
2220
2220
2220
2220
1190
<120
6120
6120
6120
2100
4000
1290
1290
1290
2210
5(5 0
S« 0
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.2 0
0.3 0
0.2 0
0.2 0
0.2 0
0.2 0
0.
0.
is.
IS.
15.
10.
1
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
4.
2.
2.
0.4
0.4
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DC
0.2
0.2
1.4
0.408 0
0.03 HA
0.03 HA
0.03 HA
0.03 HA
0.32 HA
3.75 ISA
S.9 KA
5.9 KA
5.9 KA
0.11 HA
O
o
o
li
-------
D0«0
oois
D019
D020
D021
D022
0023
DD24
002S
D02«
P027
0028
0029
D030
0031
D032
D033
D034
DOSS
D040
D041
D042
O043
D019
0022
C028
M29
0030
D032
D043
D01«
D019
D02Q
D021
D022
D023
0024
D025
D02C
DOJ7
"D028
D029
D030
D031
0032
0033
O034
0035
0040
D0«l
0042
0043
DO 18
0019
0020
DOJ1
O022
D023
D024
O02S
D02S
D027
KLLV
KLLW
HUM
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
.KLLH
HLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLH
KLLW
KLLN
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
HLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
XLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLH
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KbLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
5300
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3211
3229
3229
3229
3229
3229
3229
3229
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2110
2110
2110
2110
2110
2110
2110
2110
2110
2110
1.78 NA
0.21
0.31
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.11
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.04 NA
0.04 NA
0.04 KA
0.04 KA
0.04 KA
0.04 KA
0.04 NA
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.2S
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.2S
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.2S
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.08 NA
O.OB NA
0.08 NA
0.08 HA
0.08 KA
0.08 KA
O.OB NA
0.08 NA
0.08 NA
0.08 NA
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.-022
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.022
o
71
o
-------
XH-WOC2
XH-WOC2
IH-W062
I8-W062
IH-WOC2
XH--W062
IN V062
IH-WOC2
IN-UOS2
IK-VOC2
XK-W062
XH-WQ62
I8-W064
IN- WOTS
;H-H075
IB-WHS
XH-W07S
'IN-W075
IN-V075
IK-W075
IN-K07S
XH-W075
IN- If 075
JH-W075
•H-W07S
•H-K075
^IH-W07S
X8-W7S
XH-*07S
Uf-»075
IM-4075
1S-'«07S
IH-W75
XR-'H>75
XK-'«75
XK-ilOSO
XK-H089
ZM-U089
IH-W089
IN-U089
IH-U089
IH-H089
IH-U089
XH-H089
IH-V089
IN-V089
IN-VOBS
IN-»fO»9
IN-V089
IH-V089
IN- V 089
IH-V089
IW-V08S
1U-H049
ZS-M089
IH-W089
IN-K089
IN-W089
IH-S093
2K-W093
IS-M393
1H>W)»3
OC28
DC 29
DC 30
DC 31
DC 32
DC 33
DC 34
DO 35
DO 40
D041
D042
D043
D018
D018
D019
0020
D021
D022
DO 23
BO 24
DO 25
DO 26
DOZ7
DOU
D0.19
oo:)0
00:11
DO.I2
00:13
00:14
DO'IS
O04.0
D04il
D0<,2
D04.3
004,0
D03.8
D019
oo;o
DO:I
00:2
DO: 3
DO: 4
DOSS
D036
D037
D028
D029
D030
D031
D032
D033
D03I
D035
D049
D041
0041
D04i
DOU
D01>
DOZ!
D02!>
MUM
KLJ.M
MLL¥
KLLW
KUM
MLLH
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
'KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
•*LLW
-OiH
KLLW
KLLW
HU.W
MLLW
MLI.W
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
2110
2110
2110
2110
2110
2110
2110
2110
2110
2110
2110
2110
2220
8200
8200
8200
8200
8200
8200
8200
8200
8200
8200
8200
8200
8200
8200
820O
8200
8200
8200
8200
8200
8200
8200
1130
5430
5430
5430
5430
S430
5430
5430
S430
S430
5430
S430
5430
5430
5430
S430
5430
5430
5430
5430
5430
5430
5430
6100
£100
£100
£100
0.08 HA
0.08 HA
0.08 KA
0.08 KA
0.08 KA
0.08 KA
0.08 KA
0.08 HA
0.08 KA
0.08 KA
0.08 HA
0.03 KA
0.42 HA
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
3.2
3.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
1.7 KA
O.OS
0.05
O.OS
O.OS
O.OS
O.OS
O.OS
0.05
O.OS
0.05
0.05
0.05
O.OS
O.OS
0.05
0.05
O.OS
0.05
0.05
O.OS
0.05
0.05
.08 NA
.08 HA
-.08 NA
o.oa HA
1.23
1.29
1.29
1.29
1.29
1.29
1.29
1.29
1.29
1.29
.29
.29
.29
.29
.29
.29
.29
.29
.29
.29
.29
1.29
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
o
C/5
O
o
un
UJ
-------
^H-*093
,iH-W093
IH-W098
IH-W098
XM-H098
2N-H098
XN-H098
IH-W098
IM-H098
IH-B098
IH-W098
IN-W098
IH-WOJ8
IN-K098
IN-W098
IH-W098
-S-W098
XH-K098
XM--H098
XK-W098
XH-W098
IH-W098
XH-W098
IS-WOJ8
IH-W102
ZN-W102
XR-W103
XM-W102
18-W102
IB-W102
TJ-W103
•-wioa
•- -W102
IN-K104
IH-W116
IH-H11S
IR-Wllfi
IH-W1K
IH-W116
JS-W116
XN-W11C
IN-K116
XK-W1K
IW-M1K
IS- 1*1 19
XK-W115
XN-W119
XN-W119
XH-W119
IH-K119
IK-K119
IH-K119
IS-W.19
1M-W119
IH-W120
IH-W120
I.V-H120
IH-W120
XN-W120
IN-H120
IH-W120
T-W120
0040
D043
001S
D019
D020
O021
0022
0023
0034
D03S
002(
O037
0028
D029
0030
0031
0032
D033
0034
0035
0040
0041
0042
M43
D018
0019
O021
0022.
D027
0028
0029
0035
O043
D018
D018
0019
0021
D022
0026
0028
0032
O034
0035
0040
D018
D019
0021
O022
D02S
0028
0032
D034
003S
D040
O018
O019
D021
0022
D02(
002*
O032
D034
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
..MLLW
MLLW
.MLLW
'MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KUM
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
(100
(100
(100
C100
C100
C100
6100
6100
6100
6100
C100
6100
6100
(100
6100
6100
6100
(100
(100
(100
(100
(100
(100
(100
3130
3130
3130
3130
3130
3130
3130
3130
3130
2220
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
1110
1110
1110
1110
1110
1110
1110
1110
1110
1110
1110
1110
1110
1110
1110
1110
1110
1110
o.oa NA
0.08 KA
2.5
2.S
2.5
2,5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
5
5
5
5
S
5
5
5
5
12.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
.35
.35
.35
.35
.35
.35
.35
•» .35
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.'2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.49
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
o
o
o
-------
IN-WI120
lit -w:. 20
IB-w:.22
IN-K.22
IH-WI.22
IH-w:,22
XK-W1.22
IH-K122
IH-HJ22
XK-W122
IH-W122
XN-W222
XK-H123
IH-H123
XH-W123
IH-W123
Ih-W123
IN-W123
IK-H123
IM-W123
IN-H123
XH-W123
IK- KISS
IN-W12C
XR-W126
j*?mi
^•Wl.26
IVHl:26
Xlt-Wl:2C
ZK»wi;26
IN-wi:i6
XN-W12C
XK-W13S
Xlt-Wl!>*
XH-W1S8
XH-Wllig
IH-W1IIO
IN- vino
IK-Wl'iQ
XK-W1!>0
IN-W1M
IS-V1S 1
IK-W1S2
IM-KiJ 2
IW-W237
IN-W2I7
XK-W234
XS-W234
XK-W234
XH-W23S
XH-W23S
IH-W235
IH-W242
IH-W248
XK-W248
IH-W2SJ
XH-W2S3
XH-W253
XU-W274
IH-W274
TK-W29J
1H-W295
D03!
004C
OOlt
0019
D021
D023
O02C
0021
D032
0034
0035
D040
D013
0019
0021
0022
D026
D028
D032
0034
0035
0040
DO ISA
D018
D019
0021
O022
D026
D028
O032
0034
O035
O040
0022
D029
0022
0022
0028
0022
D028
D022
D028
D022
D028
D022
0029
0022
0028
O029
0022
0028
0029
0029
0028
0029
D022
D02B
D029
D022
0028
D022
0028
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
HLLW
KLLW
1110
1110
5400
5400
S400
5400
5400
5400
S400
5400
5400
5400
5410
S410
5410
5410
5410
5410
S410
5410
5410
5410
S400
5410
5410
S410
5410
5410
5410
5410
5410
5410
5410
5440
5440
3150
3150
3150
'3150
3150
3121
3121
3150
3150
5310
5310
5410
5410
5410
5410'
5410
S410
5220
8900
8900
5311
5311
5311
5000
SOOO
S100
5100
1.35
1.35
71.
71.
71.
71.
71.
71.
71.
71.
71.
71.
2.49
2.49
2.49
2.49
2.49
2.49
2.49
2.49
2.49
2.49
0.2
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
3150.63
3150.63
5.09
63.82
63.92
58.93
58.93
342.38
342.38
4C4.28
464.28
352.94
352.94
16.54
16.54
16.54
240.74
240.74
240.74
35. 4
138.44
138.44
4.88
4.88
4.88
18.44
18.44
164.33
6688.03
KA
KA
KA
KA
HA
HA
HA
HA
HA
HA
NA
HA
KA
NA-
KA
HA
NA
KA
KA
KA
NA
HA
NA
HA
NA
KA
KA
KA
KA
0.42
0.42
400
400
400
400
4DO
400
400
400
400
400
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
0.5
0.54
•>.S4
S4
0 .-"
O.i,
0-54
O.S4
0.54
O.S4
0.54
o
71
o
o
U1
un
-------
••V-W2SS
-M-W3T6
SB-V378
*•• 002
T.- -i02
I&-KOOS:
KA-W007
KA-K007
t> -W009
-'003
003
•014
K*--K014
>_*-WQ14
KA-W01S
X& KQ15
KA-W01S
KX-W003
KX-W003
KK-KQ03
. KK-WQOS
KK-W005
XX-KOOS
OC-W008
EK-NQOa
tx-wooa
KX-K009
KK-W003
2X-WQ09
•GC-WOll
• 3C-W011
B* won
•V' *5U
-013
..: -213
*i. - »aoi
icw-wooi.
KSf-WOOl
EW-W003
leir-KOOi
W-WOQ3
ICW-WOOS
rw-waoe
KW-WOOfi
K3I-W009
nr-woos
KK'WOOS
la-woos
LB-KOOS
LB-W305
U-WOOS
U-K012
U.-W002
Lt-WOOZ
U.-HQ02
U.-K003
LL-K303
LL-W004
U.-W004
LI,-wa04
U.-H004
«1M-HOC4
0029
D040
D03S
D018
O040
D040
0018
D040
D018
D035
D040
ooia
D03S
0040
0018
D03S
0040
D018
D03S
0040
0018
D03S
0040
0018
0035
D040
ooia
00135
D040
D018
0035
D040
D018
D035
O040
D018
D035
D040
0018
0035
0040
0018
0035
0040
0018
0035
0040
O018
0019
0022
0040
D022
D022
D028
0040
D018
0022
0018
0022
D027
D028
D329
HLLW
HLLV
KLLM
KLLW
KU.W
RLLM
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLH
MLS.W
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
HLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
HLLW
HLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
5100
£130
5330
2000
2000
3114
2000
2000
5330
5330
5330
3200
3200
3200
,4000
4000
4000
2000
2000
2000
5440
S440
5440
3200
3200
3200
5390
5390
5390
2000
2000
2000
4000
4000
4000
2000
2000
2000
5300
S300
5300
3200
3200
3200
4000
4000
4000
6110
£110
6110
C110
5440
3121
3121
3121
5310
5310
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
6688.03 N*
1.27 MA
0.02
0
0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.05
0.05
0.05
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.82
1.83
1.82
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
O.S
38
38
38
0.4
0.4
25
2S
25
25
25
0
O.C25
0.025
0.05
0.5
O.S
0.62S
0.£2S
0.625
0.1
0.1
0.1
4.2
4.2
4.2
0.25
0.25
0.25
o.a
o.a
0.8
1
1
1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
4.2
4.2
4.2
0.2
6.2
0.2
O.S
0.5
O.S
0.5
O.S
0.5
0
0
0
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
4
38
38
38
0.4
0.4
25
. 25
25
25
25
o
o
o
-------
1&. If 008
U.-H008
XA-tr.-?
tl-W
KL-W
U.-K
U.-NC1.
LL--W014
LL-W014
1L-W016
ii-WOlS
U.-W016
LL-WQ23
LL- W023
LL-W023
OR-V002
OX-W002
C«-W002
OR-W003
«»-V004
OR-W004
OR-W005
C«-K005
O8-WOOS
OR-H005
JWl-BOOS
HR-HOOS
•R- «oos
T»-l»011
OR- W011
OR-H01*
OR-W014
C3R-M14
OR-U01S
C3l-!«15
OR-M015
OR-'«15
OR-W01S
OR-K01S
4R-W034
m-ti034
OR-U034
OR-W034
CK-U034
OR-W03S
OR-W03S
CR-WOJS
CR-V035
OR-H035
Ot-tro3S
OR-V036
PA-V005
PA-V01T
PA-V017
PA-V037
PA-S037
PA-K037
PA-K038
PA-H038
PA-H038
PA-M039
PA- WO 40
DC<2»
D(<40
DC 18
DC 22
DC 29
DC 18
DC 22
DC 28
DC40
DC 22
•-:B
. 10
1:18
D022
D040
riJS
C.28
D030
D035
DO 18
DO 25
D018
D021
DO 17
D0.19
D0:ti
DO-IO
DO-13
D0:ia
DC'IO
DO:IS
00:10-31
00:15
oo:.a-22
D0:t4
oo:>8
DO:IO
DO-IS
004,2
D01B
D0::2
DO: 9
D035
D040
D01B
0019
D021
D02 2
D026
D039
D01B
D03S
D02B
D033
C026
D035
D040
D026
D035
D045
D043
D01!
MUM
HLLW
KLL*
HUH
MUAT
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLH
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
HLI.W
MLLW
MLLW
MLLH
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLN
KLLW
MLLW
MLLH
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
2000
2000
2100
2100
2100
2200
2200
2200
2200
2900
2900
2900
4X00
4100
4100
£100
6100
6100
6100
6100
6100
8000
8000
8000
8000
8000
8000
8000
2000
2OOO
£100
6100
6100
C100
£100
6100
6100
6100
6100
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000 .
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
6110
1200
1200
2100
2100
2100
S400
S400
5400
2100
2200
1(
1C
S(
S<
Si
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
31.
31.
31.
31.
£.
s.
51
51
SI
SI
51
51
SI
15.1
15.1
I.'
1."
!.•
3.5
3.S
3.S
3.S
3.S
3.S
11.:
11.;
11.:
11.:
11.:
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
is.:
o.oe
10.31
10.31
23.21
23.21
23.21
31.81
31.81
31.81
3.5
272.21
)
)
>
>
)
'
NC
NC
BC
NC
NC
NC
> NC
> NC
1 NC
1 NC
1 NC
> KC
> KC
L RC
NC
r NC
r KC
r NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
1 NC
[ NC
> NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
L
. UNO
. UNO
UNO
UNO
. TOD
. UNO
i IWD
L
10
10
so
so
50
1
1
1
o
o
0.2
o
00
to
71
o
s
LTi
—J
-------
*i»fA-W041 OOIS
*-W049 0018
PA-W049 DOSJ
PA-W049 0025
PA-H049 0026
PA-H049 0028
PA-W049 0032
PA-W049 0040
FO-W001 D018
KJ-W01 COW
PO-V001 D022
PO-H001 O028
PO-W001 0029
PO-WO01 D040
PO-W002 0018
PO-V002 0040
PO-TOOS 0018
PO-KJ07 0018
PC- WOO* O018
PO-W017 0035
PO-H019 0018
PO-WO1S O03S
PO-V322 D035
PC 22 O040
P> - 33 D035
PC- .035 0018
PO-W041 0018
PO-H044 D03S
PO-W04S 0011
PO "nSS O018
PO "57 0018
"C ~i 0022
'6 :-j 0018
PO-W06S 0028
PO-W066 0040
PO-H071 0018
PO-W072 D04O
PO-W078 0018
PX-W022 0018
PX-WOS3 003S
ar-wosi 0040
- '-W078 O018
•*-W07S 0019
V-K078 0028
'.F-N078 0029
'F-H078 C035
'J-W078 0040
•J--W078 0043
J-K079 0018
J-W079 0019
P-W079 0028
P-W079 0029
P-W079 0035
P-W079 0040
F-W079 0043
~-H042 D03S
1-W052 0035
>«05S 0035
^-W057 0035
--WOS8 0035
--VOS9 0018
.-WOS9 D035
1
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW -
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLH
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLH
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KU.W
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
•KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
2200
aooo
8000
8000
aooo'
8000
8000
8000
5440
5440
5440
5440
5440
5440
3222
3222
3100
2120
1220
3132
2900
2900
3229
3229
3132
3223
1130
1230
SJ9Q
8100
2000
2000
5440
5490
3120
5400
3210
2120
6190
5330
6190
1130
1130
1130
1130
1130
1130
1130
1290'
1290
1290
1290
1290
1290
1290
6190
3114
5420
5440 1
5490
5490
5490
0
19.75
19.75
19.75
19.75
19.75
19.75
19. 7S
S.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
O.S
O.S
•1
7.9
9.1
23.3
171
171
6,2
6^2
3
5.88
1.05
14.2
10.7
24.3
44
w
44
0.64
7.3
4.6
0.84
2.3
20.6
5.37
33.21
5.67
0
•0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5.24
1.63
11.67
32.87
8.88
6.27
6.27
0
UHD
UND
DND
UND
DND
UND
UND
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
0
0
0.21
2.8
1.6
6.3
21
21
S.
.4
2.4
0.36
2.6
0.7
5.
3.
3.
0.
2.4
0.34
1
6.2
1;9
19.63
O
V
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
4.32
1.34
4.01
143.33
3.05
2.16
2.16
O
CO
-------
RL-W060
RL-W060
RL-WOtS
RL-HOSO
Ri-WOSO
PX-V090
RL-H108
RL-W108
RL-W108
ftx.-wioa
RL-VL08
RL-WUO
«,-W116
KL*W!tl7
Ri-ir .ia
KL-IU23
RL-W'L27
RL*W!t2ft
Rt>-W:i29
M.-W:i29
M..w:t29
RL-W.29
RL-W:.29
RL-V-.30
^kW3,3Q
^MfUO
VFW130
8L-W131
RK-WC07
SR-WCOl
SR-VC02
SR-WC02
SR-WC03
SR-WC03
SH-WC03
SR-HC03
SR-WCOJ
SR-W003
SR-H003
SR-B003
SR-W003
SR-K003
SR-K003
SR-M003
SR-H003
SR-W003
SR-W003
SR-W003
SR-W003
SR-W003
SR-W003
SR-W003
SS-WQJ3
SR-W093
S3-W037
SR-W038
SB -WO 10
SR-WOU
SR-WO:JO
5R-HO:!2
3R-WO:!5
3P.-WO;i5
OOlil
D01!i
001:1
DOlll
D02I>
D04i)
D01!»
D02:!
D02II
0041)
004:1
O04II
OOlil
OQ3'i •
004(1
DDK.
001 i.
003!:
0011:
D02C'
0022
0029
003!
ooie
0019
0022
0035
O03S
0040
ooia
0019
D022
O018
0019
0020
0021
0022
D023
D024
O025
D026
D027
0028
0029
0030
D031
O033
0033
0034
0035
0040
0041
0042
D043
0018
0018
O018
O018
0018
0018
0018
0019
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MIXW
KLLW
MLLW
HLLW
KLLW
MLLW
HLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
HLLW
MLLW
HLLW
MLLW
HLLW
MLLW
HLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
HLLW
MLLW
HLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
HLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
HLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KtLW
MLLW
S440
S440
6190
3119
3119
3119
3119
3119
3119
3119
3119
S390
5440
5440
5440
4200
8900
5440
S490
5490
5490
5490
5490
6190
6190
6190
6190
5440
1230
2000
2210
2210
5330
5330
5330
$330
5330
5330
5330
5330
5330
5330
5330
5330
5330
5330
5330
5330
5330
5330
S330
5330
5330
5330
1000
1000
2100
5300
5420
2200
5400
5400
17.1
17.1
8.2
16.
16.
16.1
5.
5.
5.
S.
5.
3.«
0.7
0.
1.0
0.924
0.20
0.20
0.834
0.83
0.834
0.834
0.83
1.8
1.8.
1.8
1.8
0..
i.:
0.2.
i.o:
i.o:
5.
5.
S.
5.
5.
5.
S.
S.
5.
5.
5.
S.
5.
S.
5.
S.
5.
5.
5.
5.
S.
5.
71.
77.
3.
0.8
2791.
2791.
9 5.91
9 5.91
1 6.8
9 13.86
3 13.86
I 13.16
5 4.62
5 4.62
S 4.62
5 4.62
5 4.62
1 3.67
7 0.83
I 0.22
5 1.13
1 1.18
S 0.22
i 0.22
1 0.
I 0.
1 0.
1 0.
1 0.
L 1.49
I 1.49
L 1.49
L 1.49
I 0.22
1
1 0.4
> 0.
t 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
75
75
0
0.2
0
0
0
0
o
00
O
O
UD
-------
RBW-H02S 0022
•JPR-H025 0023
SR-H02S O024
SR-W02S 0025
SR-W02S D02C
S3-K033 0019
SR-W033 0022
SH-H033 0023
SR.V033 O024
SR-W033 D025
SR-V033 002C
SR-W03S D019
SR-W03S 0022
SR-H035 0040
SR-W042 O018
SR-W042 0035
SR H043 D018
SR-W04S DQ18
SR-H04S 0040
SR-K046 0018
SR-W04« 0019
SR-TO46 O020
SR-U046 0021
SR-W04S 0022
S*-H04« 0023
SR-H04S D024
SR-W046 0025
SS-W04S D02C
SR-TO46 0027
SR-H04C 0028*
«-W04S 0029
-W046 0030
•W046 0031
£ -V04S 0032
i- 404 C DOS 3
S -.-046 D034
Sk-W046 D035
S5-W046 0040
SB-W04S O041
St -H04C 0042
5&-H046 D043
SR-H047 D018
SR-K047 0019
SR-K047 O020
SR-W047 0021
SR-W047 D022
SR-W047 O023
SR-H047 D024
SR-W047 0025
SR-W047 D02C
SX-H04? 002?
SR-H047 0028
SR-W047 0029
SR-W047 0030
SR-W47 D031
SR-WO47 D032
SS-W047 0033
5R-W047 0034
S2-H047 0035
S7-V047 0040
5R-W047 D041
th~-W047 O042
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLW
KLLH
KLLH
MLLW
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLW
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLW
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLW
KLLH
KLLH
KLLW
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
MLLW
KLLH
KLLH
KLLW
KLLH
KLLH
KLLW
KLLW
KLLH
KLLH
KLLW
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
MLLW
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLH
KLLW
540t
5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
$400
5400
5400
2000
2000
2000
3131
3131
5440
2100
2100
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
3111
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1OOO
1000°
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
2791.1
2791.1
2791.1
2791.1
2791.1
8
8
a
8
a
a
1.9
1.9
1.9
S.3
5.3
0.21
105.8
105.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
41
41
41
41
41
41
0
0
0
1
1
o.s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
C/3
o
o
-------
SR-K047
SR-W04B
SH-W04B
SS-H048
SR-W048
SH-K048
SR-W048
SR-W048
SR-W048
SR-W04*
SR-W048
SR-W048
SR-W048
SR-W04B
SR-H048
SJ.-H048
SR W048
SR W048
SR-W04?
SR-W04.
SR-V04.
SR-W048
SR-W048
WS-W010
WS-W011
WS-W014
•S-W015
PS-W017
TIS-W017
WS-W017
us-won
KS-W017
KS-W018
WS-W018
WS-W026
WS-H028
WS-W029
WS-W030
WS-K032
WS-W032
VS-V032
WS-V032
WS-H038
WS-TO44
WS-TO50
WS--40S1
NS-W052
WS-V073
WV-W01S
WV-K01J
W-H019
WV-U01S
wv-nois
W-W01S
WV-W019
WV-W019
MV-W013
KV-»'019
KV-V019
WV-V019
WV-V019
KV-K019
DM3
Dill
D)15
D')20
D)J1
Di)22
DD23
DDJ4
DD25
OII26
DII37
DII38
DH2S
&030
D(>31
DC 32
0(33
5C34
:35
.40
:4i
C042
D04J
D040
D040
D018
9040
D018
0022
D028
SO 15
D010
ooia
0019
DO 18
DO 18
DO 15
DO 15
DO:LB
D0:»
DO:IS
OO'IO
D0:i8
Do:.e
001,0
oo:.a
00<.0
DO::O
D01.8
D019
DO; 2
DO: 3
DO; 4
DO;S
D02S
DO] 7
003 8
0029
B030
D032
0033
D034
MLLtf
KU.W
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
• KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
•MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLV.
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KL:>*
MLi
MLL
KLL»
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW'
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
1000
4900
4'Ofl
4. JO
4&00
4900
4900
4900
4900
1430
4900
4900
4900
4900
4900
4900
4900
4900
4900
4900
4»00
4900
4900
3230
5310
2120
1100
3230
3230
3230
3230
3230
2200
2200
3132
2200
2200
3132
2200
2200
2200
2200
2200
3132
1100
2220
3220
3120
2000
2000
2000
2003
203 i
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2C30
ICr.O
2000
0
18.1
18.1
18.1
18.1
18.1
18.1
18.1
18.1
18.1
18.1
18.1
18.1
18.1
18.1
1B.1
18.1
18.1
18.1
18. 1
18.1
18.1
0.2
0.2
8.7
2.1
0.2
0.2
0.
0.
0.
O.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
6.
.0739
.0739
.073»
.0739
.0739
.0739
.0739
.0739
.0739
.0739
.0739
.0739
.0739
.0739
O.CCC7
0.66S7
0.66S7
0.««7
0.66C7
0.66C7
0.6667
0.6CC7
0.6667
0.6667
0.6667
0.6667
0.666-
0.6667
O
O
O
en
-------
•P-wois
»»-W019
*»-W019
W-W019
W-W019
XP-W001
TO-W003
»rW003
*P-W003
•ST-W003
3P-S003
J»-T»03
3*-W003
3P-W003
TO-W003
YP-W003
YP-W003
YP-H003
W-TW03
YP-W003
W-W003
YP-W003
YP-H003
YP-K003
W-W003
— -W003
-W003
-W019
.'?-W019
YP-W023
JTP-W024
{•V-W027
Bfr-W027
YP-K041
YP
D018
D01»
D022
D03S
D040
D018
0035
ooia
D018
D03S
D043
ooia
D01B
D03S
0043
0018
D03S
ooia
O035
D035
DO 18
D027
HLLW
KIXH
KLtM
KLLW
MLLW
HLLH
KU.W
HLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLH
HLLW
HLLW
MLLW
HLLW
KLIN
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KU.W
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KUM
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KUM
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
HLLW
KUM
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
2000 4.0739
2000 4.0739
2000 4.0739
2000 4.0739
2COO 4.0739
S300 •
5300
5300
5300
£300
5300
5300
5300
$300
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
1.55667
.SS667
.55667
.55667
.55667
.SS667
.SS667
.55667
.55667
.55667
.55667
.55667
.55667
.55667
.SS667
.SS667
.55667
.55667
.55667
.55667
.55667
.55667
2000 2.0S007
2000 2.05007
3900 0.06047
3100 0.0997
5300 0.35039
5300 0.3S039
2000 0.2
2000 0.04S4S
5300 0.04S4S
8200 0.05303
8200 0.05303
8200 0.05303
8200 0.05303
8200 0.06061
2000 129.5541
2000 129.5541
2000 129.5541
2000 129. $541
2000 14 . 864
2000 14.864
2200 0.00045
3900 7.70911
3900 7.70911
3900 7.70911
3900 3.48305
5490 18.7612
5490 1S.7«12
5490 18.7612
S400 10.33267
5400 10.33267
2000 4.58848
3100 1.57289
3900 0.4
5400 2.60179
5400 2.60179
HC
HC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
DC
NC
NC
HC
NC
NC
NC
HC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
HC
0.6C67
0.6667
0.6667
0.6(67
0.6667
0
0
0
0
0
o
l/J
o
o
can
-------
YF-WJ83
YP-K183
YP-H18*
YP-WJ90
YP-W104
YP-WL22
YP*IT122
YP-W1123
YP-K123
YP-WU41
YP-W!i43
YP*W7.4€
»-1P»47
T9-W!.48
IP-It 49
YP-Wi.49
YP-K3 54
TP-W154
YP-WJ54
YP-W1S4
YF-WI63
VP-W64
YP-W169
YP-W171
YP-OT7I
«72
73
74
YP-«fl7«
YP-W176
W-W177
W-WI77
YP-W179
YP-WI80
YP-W182
D03!i
D04il
DOKI
D03!>
0040
O01!>
004 2:
D01S
0043
DOlt
0011
0011
Doia
0011
DOlt
0043
DOU
D022
D028
0029
D018
0018
D019
0018
D03S
0018
MIS
0035
D018
O035
0018
0035
aoia
0018
0018
TRWstnuwic TC
MS ID
xiMni2
is -in 12
n-tnu
nr-Wll2
IN-W1L2
IK- VI 12
XB-W1U
IM-W112
IK-WllJ
UI-W1.I2
llt-Wl$4
XH-W157
IN-Wll>9
IK-WlliS
IH»WX1I8
IS- Will •
:H-W1!I7
rs^wijts
:a-wi«i§
;K-W20B
:H-W2(H
:H-W2(I8
:X-K2{>9
HUH
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
•KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
MLLW
KLLW
HLLW
KLLW
KLLW
KLLW
5400
5400
2000
5300
5400
3900
3900
3100
3100
2030
3900
4100
2000
2000
5400
5400
5400
5400
5*00
5400
2000
3900
5300
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
8200
8200
2000
2000
3000
8200
8200
2.60179
2.60179
0.02727
0.03697
0.00909
0.69697
0.69697
0.06091
0.06091
0.57455
1.77273
0.85757
0.22728
0.04091
0.42423
0.42423
0.06061
0.06061
0.06061
0.06061
0.35773
0.1303
0.00061
0.1759
0.17S9
0
0.0909
O.OOOS
0.13633
0.13633
0.1137
0.1137
0.10607
0.0718
0.0682
NC
NC
NC
HC
HC
HC
HC
HC
NC
HC
HC
NC
NC
RC
NC
HC
NC
HC
NC
NC
NC
KC
HC
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MXED HASTESTREWSS
W CDI>B W TYPE
0018
D019
0021
D022
D026
0028
D032
0034
D03S
D040
0022
DO22
D022
0029
0022
0028
0022
0022
0029
0022
D028
0029
0022
tfTRB
KTR7
Mnta
KTRO
Mnto
KTRO
wraa
KTRD
KTRO
unto
KTRU
unco
KTIOT
KTRO
tana
KTRU
KTRD
KTRO
WTRO
MTRO
WTRO
KTRU
KTRQ
FORK
5410
5410
5410
5410
: 5410
5410
5410
5410
5410
5410
3150
3150
5440
5440
3150
3150
5440
5310
5310
• S410
5410
5410
5410
INVENTORY
20.4
20.4
20.
20.
20.
20.
20.
20.
20.
20.4
1.91
164.09
5774.64
5774.64
1.06
1.06
778.34
170.38
170.38
26.24
26.24
26.24
60.16
NA
HA
NA
NA
NA
HA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
94 VOL
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
o
C/3
K>
71
o
o
Uj
-------
feH-V209
PH-W209
1H-W216
XN-W216
IK-W218
IN-W218
XK-H22*
IN-W228
XK-V243
IN-W247
XH-W247
XH-M252
IK-H252
IH-W2S3
•IH-«76
IK-V376
IH-W294
IH-H29C
XN-M296
IH-H311
KA-W16
KA-H01S
XA>mi6
Ui-W019
R1-W134
SR-W026
SR-W026
1SR-W026
SR-W026
SR-V026
SR-W26
Kt-H02£
Bnt-H027
5R-H027
SR-W027
SR-W027
SR-W027
SR-W027
SR-W027
SR-W044
SR-V044
0021
0029
0022
D02»
0022
002t
9022
D028
0029
003«
0029
0022
D028
0029
0022
0021
O022
D028
O029
0021
ooia
D03S
0040
0040
0019
001 •
0019
0022
0023
0024
0025
0026
0018
0019
0022
D023
0024
D025
0026
001S
9040
HTRO
KTRO
MTRO
KTRO
KTRO
MTRO
MTRO
MTRO
KTRO
KTRO
WTRO
MTRO
MIRO
MTiUI
KTRO
KTRtJ
tsaea
MTRD
KTRO
WTRO
KTRO
MTRO
. MTRO
KTRO
MTRO
HTRO
KTRO
MTRO
KTRD
Kl'KU
KIWI
HTTO
KTRO
MTRO
KTRJJ
mm
M'KU
MTRO
MTRU
KTRO
KTRO
5410
541.0
3150
3150
3150
3150
3121
3121
5220
•900
8900
5311
5311
5311
5000
5000
5100
5100
5100
3140
5000
SOOO
SOOO
2110
$190
5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
2100
2100
CO.IE
CO.16
2531.01
2S31.01
459.19
459.19
1236.8
1Z9C.B
247.7
199.45
199.46
ICO.23
160.23
1G0.23
391.78
391.78
443.21
5243.44
5243.44
6.57
0
0
0
0.3
0.21
66.9
66.9
66.9
66.9
66.9
66.9
66.9
495S.5
4955.5
4SSS.S
4955.5
4955.5
4955.5
4955.5
1.3
1.3
KA
HA
HA
KA
HA
HA
KA
HA
KA
HA
KA
KA
KA
KA
HA
HA
HA
HA
HA.
KA
0.036
0.036
0.036
0.3
0.61
371
371
371
371
371
371
371
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
C/l
J
-------
"1
•Iff'
ll
o
APPENDIX F
DATA ON DEEP WELL INJECTED WASTES
I
4^
un
-------
APPENDIX C
DATA ON DEEP WELL INJECTEDED WASTES
O
C/3
to
cn
on
-------
a**^f!*Nf
EPA has vary limited information which differentiates high
TOC D001 ignitable wastes from low TOC D001 ignitable wastes,
particularly with reference to the type of Class I injection well
(i.a. nonhazardous versus hazardous) the wastes are disposed
into. However, the information the Agency does have indica~.es
that both D001 ignitable wastes and 0012 - D017 TC pesticide
wastes are deep well injected into class X hazardous wells with
no-nigration petitions. EPA estimates that, based on management
practices, little if any diluted high TOC ignitable waste is
injected into Class I nonhazardous wells, and no more than 419
tons of 0012 - D017 pesticide wastes are deep well injected into
Clasn I wells without no-migration petitions.
iff!'
o
C/3
to
71
o
o
<
•
-------
41-1207
934-3000
ZFINCORPORATED
MEMORANDUM
July 9. 1993
H
Bengie Carroll
Sarah Stafford and Mario Kerby
JBJECT: Deepwefl Injected 0001 Wastestreams
o
In the Phase 1! proposed rule. deeharacterized high TOG Ignttabto (0001)
twastewaters may no longer b* injected into Class I nonhazardoua weds. Th* atlachtd
0001 wastaslraams raporttd In th« i989Bitnnial
to
71
o
o
»
sportng Syttam (BBS) database Thto Momwdon was attracted from the GM form which
-ovide* Information on wiste generatkm and management For each wistasiream, me table
:!Kfie*tM the name and EPA ID of the facility generating each waste stream, codes for al the
wastes in each stream, whether the waste was deepwel injected on- or off-tit*, the volume of
each wactattream, and the statue of any no migration petttton at the fadnty. (Under thfc
oropota). tf a wed has a tufty approved no migration petition, the faculty may continue to
-oepweB Inject treated Ngh TOC OOOt wastes.)
Them are two major ImltatJona In using this data to determine the volume of wastes
,-tfected by tWs provision. First, facBttes an not required to dWngutoh between high TOC
\A low TOC 0001 wastes. Thus in the BBS database. H cannot be determined whether a
•»1 wastestream could be affected by this rule. Second, the BBS does not distinguish
ween nonhazsntous and hazardous deep wells. Therefore, in estimating the volume of
:tee aflected by this proposal, we can only use the BBS to provide an upperbound
-imate.
CO
-------
MM M* EXTRACT Of OCCPWEU. INJCCTa 0001 WAfTCSTNEAMS
V».G fACUTYNAME
COOl
STREAM WASTE
cope
ftEDlMNBCAMUeM
ALPOOOOMM CiAIJ&UCASINC
AlDtMOMOTO MAtUCK HOWLS TEPMINAL.
AU0007000M MOBIL! TANK WASHING
CEDJ A CHBI1CAL CORPORATION
CAOOOOO»4»t MATUCKINC
4U1
IIHOI wwroQMRcncum
iati
OHM i we
UOMOTTIM* omn,
4M1
NALCO
IftW
I UMO»MOO
OUAKTITY
IN TON*
PETITION
STATUS"
DOOI
ooot
Mil
MIT
OFF
4i.it INOTKNOWN
• DOBI
fOtt
Off
9 DM1
CM*
OFT
a oooi
Off
t 00*1
aai .n
* oooi
off
111.M
a ooot
DOM
or*
tTt.0*
It OOOI
Off
7.\\
oST
• 0001
0.00
4 DOOI
riioooi
DOW
0011
Off
10 oooi
Off
IJt
T OOOI
0.10
1 0001
2 DOOI
SMO
o 0001^
« OOOI
• OOOI
Of ERATINa A8 NONBAI.
NOTKNOWN
NOT KNOWN
NOT KNOWN
WT KNOWN
NOT KNOWN
NOT KNOWN
NOT KNOWN
•ttinuWn tan CMA Untftynun* MjMtai Cawot Pragram •*•*>«. fMnury 1001.
JULY0.10O9
IS!
O
(75
O
O
en
uo
-------
lOOttM fXTBACTOF OEEPWEI.L WJBCTS) 0001 WASTMTR6AU*
0«i; MOUTVIMMl *C STREAM WASTE OWOfF OUA/mTf FetmOK
oooe OOOE srre MTOM STATU«-
VSDOM7M4M
30MMM3M
3KD041I91M7
3KDOTMMIO*
H
AUERECO ENVIRONMENTAL SEF.V 47H
MM INC Ittl
OOWELLKHUIUaneEHTECKN IMO
ueooNNELOoueiACTiiUA mi
CHEMUNK MM
EHVinONMENTALUAMMEUENTI Nil
US KAW LTV AEJO«>ACe 171 1
UtNAVYCOtWUSCHWCn
0007
t 0001 Off **» INOT KNOWN
* 0001 .OFF tit
a 0001 OFF i at
»01
FOOS
FOOt
S 0001 OFF 10M
» O001 OFF l«i»e»
oooo
0007
ooot
7 D001 ' OFF 1.00
ooot
U1M
Ut» ' .
1 0001 OFF '.1-00
Met
OOM
0004
POM
OOM
OOOT
OOOO
DOM
MM
0011
F001 - .
IMS
• OM1 OFF 1.00
OOM
OOM
OOOT <
OOM
OOM
Ml*
aoii
It OOOt OFF MO
OOM
MOT
MM •
M10
M11
FOOt
FOM
FOM
30.55
9 g "
I.
inMn fHtban «ttii ttkn *wn CUA unMrgrauM ki|M«in Condrt Fray** Ktatne. F*bn«nr 100)1.
o
00
to
71
o
o
—ii
JVH.Y0.1
-------
___
QUANTITY
IN TONS
PETITION
STATUr
» ocoi
OON
OOOT
0«M
0010
FOOt
ceei
0002
OOM
0007
MM
root
DMT
MOTKNOWN
lip,
fill
5 « «_ w
o
o
o
jin.Tt.im
—J
-------
MM Wl BCTIWCT Of DCEPWEU. INJKTHJ DMt WA«TUTKE«M*
ft,
56 CIBEMi WACTC OWOfF OUANTITY
BTB INTOK*
> ooat
Does
0007
ooie
Mil
Ml*
not
not
FOOl
MBit
UIM
1.U7.00
MOT
MM
M11
MM
UtM
4 OOfll
not
_ UOT4
I 0001
a
o
w
to
o
o
nCWAt
—I
-------
1«M IAS CXTMCT Of DEEPWEU.1HJKTH5 COO 1 *UTt*r*tMtt
5»*r
MaUTYHMMJ
55
COM
STREAM
CH13UUNKINC
MOWUCHftHCAtCO
MUHHOMETM1UMICM.
COM
1 0001
0001
DOM
000*
000?
DOM
DOM
0010
Mil
D01J
OOAWTTTY permoN
IH TOHS STATU»'
I.MO.M ]FULLY*»"OVBI
DM1
OOOT
~SfT
HIM
• OMI
0001
1 OMI
DM0
i oob'i
OFF
f OMI
OFF
"OFT
»00
MOTKNOWN
NOT KNOWN
NOTKMOWN
NOTKNOWM
NOTIMOWM"
o
C/3
to
*rl
O
O
JULY i. ton
uy
-------
iitt »M eenwcT OF oiowtu. nuecTto oooi WMTESTWUU*
P"0"
* OOOI
DOM
DOM
O004
MM
DM*
MM
DOM
0010
Mil
MIS
MM
MIT
UOil
U1X*
U1M
U1M
«nc
Htrottf «T*TW
1.U100 ! UUYAPPflOVCD
000*
MM
MM
MM
DM7
MM
MM
Ml*
Mil
MIS
Ml*
M14
Ml*
MM
M17
MM
nti
UMI
a oooi
. U1M
t.«*«Ma.M
oooa
MM
WT KNOWN"
NOT KNOWN
o
O
o
JULV0.10W
-------
1MOIF XTMCTOFOeEPWEU.IIMECTB>OOOtWACTElTMMir
NALCOCHBICO
cooe
PUNT I1C CO
HOEGNCT CIUWE4C CHBt OHOU
._.
SO»Htttt« AM? TTJKHCOFt INC WC
rtitnitini OM.-AHI root come
OUMDIV
0001
000*
IN TOM*
CTATUt*
4 P001
I 0001
1 D001
1 0001
Off
»00
t 0001
woo
0 0001
a 0001
M01
OFF
2.00
• DM1
FOOt
FOOX
1» 0001
» 0001
• 0001
NOT KNOWN
NOT KNOWN
NOT KNOWN
HOT KNOWN
WT KNOWN
NOTKNOWN
NOTKNOWN
OMkwi komCIMUMMpauMI^MMBOanMI Prognm KMhis. Mm** 1M1.
'KS
o
00
to
71
o
o
un
-------
UMMf EXtMCTOFOCEPwaxttUECtWDtOI WMTf STREAM*
_ eooe coot wt INTOW . STATU»«
e
^A
Pf
•umw Awx>nn«rni.ooc»uMNtLWf
S DOOI OH 2l$.t*«M
D002
OOOt , *
BOOT
DOO*
Don
Mot
NO*
F004
ooct
UOM
. U11I
UUI
U1M
U1H
. Oi«r
UtM
It OOQI ON I.OM.O*
OOOt
ooor
S OOOt Off W7.M
Doe*
OOOT
i 0001 off Mtjdo
a DOOI off - MOJO
M0>
11 DOOI Off 0040
DOM
uow
Uttt
Ultl
ut«o
U1M
U101
U*1«
mis
UMO
FULLY iftmvm
-
NOT KNOWN
WTXNOWN
RMJ.T«ffMWa
MOT KNOWN
MOT KNOWN
I twi GUAUndvgiauM ln^c«en ConM Pragraoi KMn*. FMnMy itn.
!t«
ill!
§5*8.*
->a||3
| • »£.£
O-O-IT*
* 8 s?
IM
Es|
o
71
o
o
juLrt.ua
-------
IM« IM EXTMCT OF OCETWEU iNjecTBJ 0001 WACTTCTMAMS
COM
wrr*HK(HOUSTO»0 INC
^•71714
at i
__.
OM1~
doe*
DOM
art
IN TOMS
ZQ.Ott.OO
DOOI
oou
DOM
ON
•4.IMOO
I OMI
uooe
uoas
UM
4 DOOI
U1«0
ooot
8TATUS'
FUUVAWAOVED
WT KNOWN
HOT KNOWN
• ton CM* liMMfMind kijMKaieoHlNl Progna liMnf. fttniwy WM.
; sfs
> -5?
c cB
*!!!.
o
oo
K)
71
o
o
—J
Jvn.YO.1Hl
-------
-------